Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2004-01-28
4�JN`v SRNI/S ffQ�i ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ° January 22, 2004 phone: (714)962-2411 fax'(714)962-0356 NOTICE OF MEETING www.acsd.com mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Fountain Valley,,C CA A 92728-8127 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 WEDNESDAY, January 28, 2004 — 7:00 P.M. Member Agencies 0 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Cities 10844 Ellis Avenue Anaheim Fountain Valley, California 92708 Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Garden Grove The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange Count Sanitation Huntington Beach 9 9 9 y Irvine District will be held at the above location, time and date. La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Santa Ana a Seal Beach nd Secret Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda County of Orange OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 4, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. Sanitary Districts PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, February 5, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. Costa Mesa Midway City JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Water Districts SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, February 9, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD Irvine Ranch FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 11, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. NEW DIRECTORS' WORKSHOP - Wednesday, February 18, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 25, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. ', iu maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. BOARD MEETING DATES Board Meeting February 25, 2004 March 24, 2004 April 28, 2004 May 26, 2004 June 23, 2004 *July 21, 2004 August 25, 2004 September 22, 2004 October 27, 2004 *November 17, 2004 *December 15, 2004 January 26, 2005 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month HAdephadminlBSlAgenda12004 Meeting NoGces\MN1.2.doc I BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING January 28, 2004—7:00 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Fountain Valley John Collins Larry Crandall Huntington Beach Cathy Green Gil Coerper La Palma Paul Walker Larry Herman Newport Beach Tod Ridgeway Don Webb Stanton Brian Donahue David Shawver G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agendas\2003 Board Agendas\121703 supplemental.doc `OIS Y SAN,,,l ON N o ti + m e 9 January 28, 2003 TO: All OCSD Directors FROM: Blake Anderson, General Manager SUBJECT: Fats, Oils and Grease Program (FOG) update Following up on the discussion at the December board meeting, here is the latest on city participation in the communications element of the FOG Program. To date, only five cities have said "no." They are: • Irvine • Villa Park • La Palma • Garden Grove • Costa Mesa Sanitary District The City of Irvine is not participating because Irvine Ranch Water District will partake instead. Costa Mesa Sanitary District already has a FOG program underway, and was kind enough to send us a thank you letter for our leadership and cooperation. Three cities are now in the process of evaluating whether or not they will participate. They are: • Brea • Fountain Valley • Tustin They will be asked to tell us by February 27th whether they plan to participate. A letter will be sent by the end of January to non-responsive cities announcing this deadline. I have attached a listing of participating staff for your information. If the Orange County Sanitation District can provide you with any additional information or assistance, please give me a call at 714.593.71 10. Thank you. cc:City Manager H:ldept/admin/130/FOG BA:AB City and Agency Staff Contacted Re: FOG Participation Program Last I First/MI I Mr-. 1 Title j Org1 Org2 StaffNarne Street City State Zip I 200 S.Anaheim i Morgan David Mr. lCityManager City of Anaheim j Keith Linker Boulevard Anaheim CA 92805 O'Donnell Tim Mr. City Manager City of Brea jJerry Mesa 1 Civic Center Circle Brea I CA 92821 i I 6650 Beach City of Buena I Boulevard, P.O.Box Beaubien Greg I Mr. City Manager I Park I Ron M. Nerio 5009 1 Buena Park CA 90622-5009 City of Costa Roeder 1AIIan L. Mr. ICity Manager Mesa 1P. 0. Box 1200 Costa Mesa CA 92628-1200 Importuna Patrick Mr. City Manager City of Cypress Kamran Dadbeh I P. 0. Box 609 Cypress CA 90630 Raymond City of Fountain I Fountain Kromer H. Mr. City Manager (Valley 'Steve Hauerwaas 10200 Slater Avenue Valley CA 92708 I I 303 W. lCommonwealth I II Meyer Chris Mr. ICity Manager I City of Fullerton Robert Savage jAvenue Fullerton ! CA 92832 j !City of Garden j Garden Grove 1 I Garden j Tindall George Mr. City Manager Grove Sanitary District Konya Vivanti P. 0. Box 3070 lGrove CA 92842 City of Huntington I ! Huntington Silver Ray Mr. City Administrator Beach Todd Broussard 12000 Main Street Beach CA 92648 Hart Allison Ms. City Manager lCity of Irvine I Mike Loving P. 0. Box 19575 Ilryine CA 92623-9575 Bridenbecker Brad Mr. City Manager !City of La Habra Martin Pastucha P. 0. Box 337 La Habra CA 1 90633-0337 Standiford Catherine Ms. City Manager (City of La Palma I Ismile Noorbaksh 7822 Walker Street La Palma CA 90623 City of Los Los j Dominguez Robert C. Mr. City Manager Alamitos ITim D'Zmura 3191 Katella Avenue Alamitos CA 90720 City of Newport 3300 Newport Newport Bludau I Homer Mr. !City Manager I Beach ; Terresa Moritz Boulevard Beach CA 92663 � o von Rudat David Mr. City Manager I City of Orange Schimmelmann P. 0. Box 449 Orange CA I 92866 Christopher 401 E. Chapman D'Amato I Robert Mr. City Administrator jCity of Placentia i jBecker Avenue Placentia CA j 92870 Ream David I Mr. City Manager ICity of Santa Ana j Ray Burk P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana I CA 92702 j !City of Seal I , Bahorski jJohn Mr. City Manager 113each George Bernard 211 8th Street Seal Beach CA 190740-6305 I I Wager (Jake IMr. City Manager City of Stanton Mike Kim 17800 Katella Avenue Stanton CA 90680-3162 jr City and Agency Staff Contacted Re: FOG Participation Program Last First/Ml Mr. '! Title OrgIl Org2 staffName Street city State Zip j Huston William A. Mr. (City Manager City of Tustin Michael Gomez 300 Centennial Way Tustin CA 92780 17855 Santiago Rodericks George Mr. City Manager City of Villa Park lWarren Repke Boulevard Villa Park CA 92861 City of 8200 Westminster Vestal IDon Mr. City Manager Westminster I j Boulevard Westminster CA 92683 !Terrence I City of Yorba Belanger L. I Mr. I City Manager Linda Ijack Baecker P. O. Box 87014 I Yorba Linda CA 92886 Manager/District Costa Mesa Hamers Rob j Mr. Engineer Sanitary District j Tom Fauth P. O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa ( CA 92628-1200 Mahoney Bill I Mr. Assistant CEO County of Orange{ 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana CA 92701 Planning and Manager,Water i IDevelopment j Resource Services Wellborn I Michael Mr. Programs County of Orange Department 1300 N. Flower Street Santa Ana I CA 92703-5000 El Toro Water 124251 Los Alisos Hill Robert R. Mr. General Manager District ! Renzo Marin j Boulevard Lake Forest CA 92630 { Irvine Ranch 15600 Sand Canyon Jones 'Paul Mr. �General Manager Water District ; Avenue Irvine j CA 92618 Midway City 14451 Cedarwood Briles Ron M. Mr. General Manager Sanitary District IAvenue iWestminsterl CA I 92683 Rossmoor/Los j Alamitos Area I i Los Crafton jAnn Ms. GGeneral Manager Sewer District P. O. Box 542 Alamitos CA I 90720 Sunset Beach 1 I Sunset Burns j Edward H. Mr. Superintendent Sanitary District P. O. Box 1185 I Beach CA 90742 i IYorba Linda Robertson lWilliam J. Mr. General Manager lWater District ! ! 4622 Plumosa Drive Yorba Linda CA 92886 :l R 4OJNt� SAWTATTOy 1 � 9 n 90 � b ate? lFCryG...�E ENV\�p� January 14, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress Data on the level of treatment progress and its impacts on the final effluent are attached: Historical trends for final effluent percent of secondary treatment for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) are shown. In addition, current monthly data for BOD, TSS and disinfection effectiveness are shown on a schematic of the treatment system. All operationally available secondary treatment facilities are online. Staff continues to make in- plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards, which are 30/30 ppm TSS and BOD. The final effluent is a blend of 68% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, 2002, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During December 2003, the final effluent averaged 34 ppm TSS and 61 ppm BOD. Our final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility disinfection system, which has now been in operation since August 2002. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, entercocci bacteria and viruses. The permit criteria is 1000 MPN/100 mL for a total coliform at the 3 mile offshore line. December 2003 results for total coliform averaged about 1,080 MPN/100 mL, which is substantially below the final effluent of 180,000 MPN/100 mL. The 180,000 MPN/100 mL goal was developed by using the 180:1 dilution the outfall provided. The final effluent had a maximum 0.65 ppm chlorine residual averaged over eight hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm daily maximum compliance limit. Additional disinfection data is reported to the Web @ www.odsd.com. RJO:jmf h:\dept\om\810\fina1\rjo\board of directors\board handouts\1-14-04\board packet cover letter(1-14-04)jf.doc Attachments (2) OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley.CA 9272"127 0 (714)962.2411 i Orange Cowity Sanitatiou District f' Operational Treatment Levels Revision 1/14/04 Final Effluent Monthly Data Percent Secondary Treatment 75% 720/ Monthly Average 70% -68%--69% ...68%... ....... 68%-------------- ..............................................68%- 66% 65% ................................ . ................... 63%...-63ya------...------- % ...630/ .......... Winter 2002 Goal=64% 6 0 60% - -------------------------- --------------- 55% ---------------------------------•--------------- —--------------.....-......---......------------------------------- 50% -------------------------- -----—------.........................------------------------....._- ----------------.---- 45% ---------------------------------------- .......................................----............................... 40% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2003 2003 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) ppm in Final Effluent ppm in Final Effluent 100 100 90 ................................................. . .. ....... . ... . -- 90 -. ......1 998 Permit Limit=100 ppm..................... . ----------- --------------------------------------- 80 .... ----...--------................---......------ -- ...................----......-- --•- ----------- 70 ................... .................•---.......................................................... . ---------- 70 .................................. 62 . ----.- ..........60 .6 61........ 83---- ---- .................... ..... 60 1998 Permit Limit=60 ppm 60 5 60 56 59 57 ......... 50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----.-------------.----.--- 40 26-------37•..................36-•-•------------ 40 ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- 33 34 ------32....... ..........32....--••33----- 34 30 40 30 30 Secondary Standard Goal=30 ppm Secondary Standard Goal-30 ppm 20 - ------------------------------------------------- 10 ---------------------------------•----------------- -•---------- ................. 10 ..............:............................---.......................................................... 0 1 1 0. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2003 2003 2003 2003 M 7 Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Fiscal Year 2001 -02 Ending June 2002 Progress to Secondary Standards (Prior to July 17, 2002 Board decision) Month: December 2003 47% 1 32% Advanced Advanced Primary Ocean Pipeline Primary Ocean Pipeline Wato Wate Dlsln'cctlon& Mimed Mimed Dechlorination Online.Aug 12,2002 53% Secondary Final Effluent: Secondary BOD = 72 ppm TSS = 51 ppm Bacteria Reduction: 99.999+% Goal: 99.3% Reduction Ocean Discharge Chlorine Limit Chlorine Level Permit Limit: Daily Maximum: 1.45 ppm Daily Maximum: ppm BOD = 100 ppm (Average of 8 Samples) TSS = 60 ppm Final Effluent: Final Effluent Goal: BOD = ppm BOD = 30 ppm TSS = ppm TSS = 30 ppm Orange County .Sanitation District .Board Chairs (1948 to Present) Willard Smith Clifton Miller Don E. Smith Orange County Board of Tustin :Orange Supervisors '05/14/69-05/13/70 ' 07/08/87-07/12/89 06/24/48 06/22/49 Norman E. Culver' Ronald B. HoestereY Virgil Reed Garden Grove San.Dist. Tustin Santa Ana .05/13/70—07/14/71 07/12/89- 12/13/89 06/22/49—04/26/51 - Edward Just . A.$. "Buck"Catlin *Braden Finch Fountain Valley Fullerton Newport Beach 07/14/7,I 07/12n2 12/13/89—07/17/91 04/26/51 -05/13/53 Robert Finnell William D. Mahoney *Robert H: Boney: . Placentia La Habra Anaheim. 07/12/72 07/10/74 07/17/91 07/13/94 05/13/5.3—05/12/54 *Don Wind *John C. Cox,Jr. -Courtney R.Chandler Villa Park Newport Beach Santa-Ana 07/10/74—07/13/77 07/13/94—07/24-96: 05/12/54—05/08/57 Donald J. Saltarelli John Collins Dale H: Heinly. Tustin Fountain Valley Santa Ana 07/13/77-07/11/79t 07/24/9.6 07/01/98 05/08/57 05/13/59 ... Donald L. Fox Burnie Dunlap , Frank L Schweitzer, Jr. Brea Brea Brea 07/11/.79' 07/09/80 .07/01/98 - 1 I/18/98: 05/13159 -05A U60 Bill.Vardoulis-- Jan Debay Howard M. Cornwell. , Irvine Newport Beach Fullerton .07/09/80—07/08/81 1-1/18/98 -06/30/00 05/11/60-09.11/66 Donald A: Holt,'Jr. Norman Z. Eckenrode Harry Harvey :Placentia Placentia Santa Ana - 07/08/81 -04/11/84 07/01/QO—06/30/02 .05/11/66=03/08/67 . Richard B.'Edgar ' Shirley McCracken *Lindsley Parsons Tustin Anaheim Newport:Beach 05/09/84.' 07/10/85 07/01/02'-=Current 03/08/67 05/08/6.8 . .Dori R. Griffin Thomas O. Speer'. Buena Park *No.photo currently Brea .07/10/85—07/08/87 available. (Bev. 1127104) 05/08/68-05/14/69 Proudly Protecting the Environment for 50.Years' '1954-2004 ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 1/28/04 TIME: 7:00 a.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... (WILSON) ........................ BANKHEAD................... (MC GOWAN)................... BORTLE ................. ..... (SWAN) ............................ BRADY ......................... (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ................... (AMBRIZ).......................... CAVECCHE................... (GARCIA) ......................... CHRISTY..................... (CRANDALL).................... COLLINS ...................... (COERPER) .................... GREEN....................... (BROADWATER) ............. DALTON....................... (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE..................... (WILSON)......................... DUVALL...................... (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... (POE)................................ JEMPSA...................... (DAVERT)......................... KAVVA9141 ............... (SHEA) ............................. KROM........................ (DOW) .............................. MARSHALL.................. (HERNANDEZ)................. MC CRACKEN............... (BEAUMAN) ..................... MOORE........................ (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............. (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ (WEBB) ............................ RIDGEWAY................... (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... (HERMAN)........................ WALKER....................... STAFF: Anderson Beekman Ghirelli Kyle Ludwin Miles Ooten Tomko Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Nixon 1/28/04 G:1wp.dtaladmin\BS\DIRECTOR1Directors Roll Call.doc ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 1/28/04 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... ✓ (WILSON) ........................ BANKHEAD................... (MC GOWAN)................... BORTLE ................. ..... / (SWAN) ............................ BRADY .........................�� (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ...................� (AMBRIZ).......................... CAVECCHE................... ✓ ✓._sue (GARCIA) ......................... CHRISTY..................... / ✓ (CRANDALL).................... COLLINS ...................... / ✓ (COERPER) .................... GREEN....................... i/ ✓ (BROADWATER) ............. DALTON....................... �� r/ (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE..................... (WILSON)......................... DUVALL...................... (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. / ad (SCHAFER) ...................... FERRYMAN................... ✓ ✓ (POE)................................ JEMPSA...................... % ✓ d' (DAVERT)......................... ............... ✓ .57/ TTF9I Sf (SHEA) ............................. KROM........................ ✓ (DOW) .............................. MARSHALL.................. �i ✓ (HERNANDEZ)................. MC CRACKEN............... G', (BEAUMAN) ..................... MOORE........................ ✓ �� (EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER.............. (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ �� ✓ (WEBB) ............................ RIDGEWAY................... (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... ,✓ �� (HERMAN)........................ WALKER....................... ix STAFF: /04 ��J Anderson Beekman Ghirelli Kyle Ludwin ✓ Miles Ooten Tomko ✓ Streed OTHERS: ���' Woodruff Nixon 1/28/04 G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\DIRECTOR\Directors Roll Call.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ( , �' I �I AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 9' V� I C- HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) WA (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: �t'j (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS k All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 0 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: 1 �130 (number/street) Wes-��►� � .�� C� ga �� � (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( ) REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) L SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM (please print) (pleaseprint) �00 cos ti H:\WP.DTAWDMIN\BS\FORMS\SIGN-IN FORM.DOC STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on 2004was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ---2 —6 y , 2003. �� '� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 200i3�/ Penny M. Kyle,Secretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District G:\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING January 28, 2004— 7:00 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Fountain Valley John Collins Larry Crandall Huntington Beach Cathy Green Gil Coerper La Palma Paul Walker Larry Herman Newport Beach Tod Ridgeway Don Webb Stanton Brian Donahue David Shawver G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agendas\2003 Board Agendas\121703 supplemental.doc -4�JNS+ SAN,, 7, O ti i C 9 T January 28, 2003 TO: All OCSD Directors FROM: Blake Anderson, General Manager SUBJECT: Fats, Oils and Grease Program (FOG) update Following up on the discussion at the December board meeting, here is the latest on city participation in the communications element of the FOG Program. To date, only five cities have said "no." They are: • Irvine • Villa Park • La Palma • Garden Grove • Costa Mesa Sanitary District The City of Irvine is not participating because Irvine Ranch Water District will partake instead. Costa Mesa Sanitary District already has a FOG program underway, and was kind enough to send us a thank you letter for our leadership and cooperation. Three cities are now in the process of evaluating whether or not they will participate. They are: • Brea • Fountain Valley • Tustin They will be asked to tell us by February 27th whether they plan to participate. A letter will be sent by the end of January to non-responsive cities announcing this deadline. I have attached a listing of participating staff for your information. If the Orange County Sanitation District can provide you with any additional information or assistance, please give me a call at 714.593.7110. Thank you. cc:City Manager H:ldept/admin/130/F0G BA:AB City and Agency Staff Contacted Re: FOG Participation Program Last First/Ml Mr. Title Org1 Org2 Sta Name Street City State Zip I 200 S.Anaheim i Morgan David Mr. City Manager (City of Anaheim I jKeith Linker Boulevard Anaheim CA 92805 O'Donnell Tim Mr. City Manager City of Brea 1 !Jerry Mesa 1 Civic Center Circle Brea CA 92821 6650 Beach I j !City of Buena I Boulevard, P.O.Box Beaubien IGreg IMr. I City Manager Park I Ron M. Nerio 5009 Buena Park CA 90622-5009 City of Costa ! ! Roeder Allan L. Mr. City Manager Mesa P. 0. Box 1200 Costa Mesa CA 92628-1200 Importuna Patrick Mr. City Manager j City of Cypress ; Kamran Dadbeh P. 0. Box 609 Cypress CA 90630 Raymond City of Fountain i Fountain i Kromer ,H. Mr. City Manager Valley Steve Hauerwaas 10200 Slater Avenue Valley CA i 92708 303 W. Commonwealth j Meyer Chris Mr. City Manager City of Fullerton i Robert Savage jAvenue Fullerton I CA 92832 j I ICity of Garden Garden Grove Garden I { Tindall George jMr. ICity Manager !Grove Sanitary District Konya Vivanti P. 0. Box 3070 Grove CA 92842 City of Huntington I Huntington Silver lRay Mr. City Administrator Beach Todd Broussard 2000 Main Street Beach CA 92648 Hart Allison I Ms. City Manager City of Irvine I Mike Loving P. 0. Box 19575 Irvine CA 92623-9575 Bridenbecker Brad Mr. City Manager City of La Habra Martin Pastucha P. 0. Box 337 La Habra CA 1 90633-0337 Standiford Catherine I Ms. City Manager jCity of La Palma Ismile Noorbaksh 7822 Walker Street La Palma CA 90623 City of Los Los Dominguez Robert C. IMr. City Manager Alamitos Tim D'Zmura 3191 Katella Avenue Alamitos ! CA 90720 City of Newport 3300 Newport Newport Bludau I Homer Mr. City Manager Beach Terresa Moritz Boulevard Beach CA 92663 Bobvon Rudat David Mr. City Manager City of Orange i Schimmelmann P. 0. Box 449 Orange CA ! 92866 Christopher 401 E. Chapman D'Amato IRobert IMr. City Administrator City ofPlacentia !Becker Avenue Placentia CAI 92870 Ream David IMr. ICity Manager ICity of Santa Ana j !Ray Burk P.O. Box 1988 ISanta Ana j CA 92702 City of Seal Bahorski jJohn �Mr. City Manager Beach George Bernard 1211 8th Street Seal Beach CA 90740-6305 i Wager Jake Mr. jCityManager ICity of Stanton ; Mike Kim 17800 Katella Avenue Stanton CA 1_90680-31621 ;c City and Agency Staff Contacted Re: FOG Participation Program Last i First/ Mr. Title ! Orgll Org2 StaffName Street City I State Zip Huston William A. Mr. !City Manager City of Tustin i Michael Gomez 300 Centennial Way Tustin CA 92780 17855 Santiago Rodericks George IMr. City Manager !City of Villa Park ' (Warren Repke Boulevard Villa Park CA ( 92861 City of i 8200 Westminster Vestal Don Mr. City Manager Westminster I Boulevard lWestminsterl CA ! 92683 Terrence I City of Yorba ; Belanger L. Mr. !City Manager (Linda ! !Jack Baecker P. O. Box 87014 !Yorba Linda I CA 92886 Manager/District Costa Mesa I ; Harriers Rob j Mr. Engineer Sanitary District Tom Fauth i P. O. Box 1200 1 Costa Mesa j CA 1 92628-1200 I I I Mahoney Bill Mr. Assistant CEO ,County of Orange; ! 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana f CA 92701 j Planning and I i Manager,Water I Development Resource Services Wellborn j Michael j Mr. Programs County of Orange Department j 1300 N. Flower Street j Santa Ana I CA 92703-5000 El Toro Water ! 24251 Los Alisos Hill Robert R. Mr. General Manager District ! Renzo Marin i g Boulevard Lake Forest , CA ; 92630 Irvine Ranch 15600 Sand Canyon Jones Paul Mr. !General Manager Water District Avenue Irvine CA I 92618 I MidwayCity 14451 Cedarwood j I Briles Ron M. Mr. General Manager Sanitary District I Avenue lWestminster! CA I 92683 iI Rossmoor/Los I iAlamitos Area ! I lLos i Crafton (Ann Ms. General Manager (Sewer District ! ' P. O. Box 542 ;Alamitos : CA 90720 Sunset Beach Sunset Burns Edward H. Mr. Superintendent Sanitary District i I P. O. Box 1185 Beach j CA 90742 i Yorba Linda Robertson (William J. Mr. General Manager I Water District I 4622 Plumosa Drive (Yorba Linda 7CA 92886 -r ' } 4oUNZY SANE r � 9 ¢ ci O wvv "'o FCr/N�E fNVQ�d January 14, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress Data on the level of treatment progress and its impacts on the final effluent are attached. Historical trends for final effluent percent of secondary treatment for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) are shown. In addition, current monthly data for BOD, TSS and disinfection effectiveness are shown on a schematic of the treatment system. All operationally available secondary treatment facilities are online. Staff continues to make in- plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards, which are 30/30 ppm TSS and BOD. The final effluent is a blend of 68% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, 2002, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During December 2003, the final effluent averaged 34 ppm TSS and 61 ppm BOD. Our final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility disinfection system, which has now been in operation since August 2002. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, entercocci bacteria and viruses. The permit criteria is 1000 MPN/100 mL for a total coliform at the 3 mile offshore line. December 2003 results for total coliform averaged about 1,080 MPN/100 mL, which is substantially below the final effluent of 180,000 MPN/100 mL. The 180,000 MPN1100 mL goal was developed by using the 180:1 dilution the outfall provided. The final effluent had a maximum 0.65 ppm chlorine residual averaged over eight hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm daily maximum compliance limit. Additional disinfection data is reported to the Web @ www.odsd.com. RJO:jmf hAdeptlom\8101finaMolboard of directors%oard handouts\1-14-041board packet cover letter(1-14-04)jf.doc Attachments (2) OCSD 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 O�M,I%Also Orange Comity Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels b �,+ Revision 1/14/04 Final Effluent Monthly Data Percent Secondary Treatment 75% 72°/ Monthly Average 0 70% '68% .°...-68%... ........ 68%................. ............ ................................ 68%.. 66% 65% ...... -- .. . ....... ............................ 63%.... ° ....... -- . %.... Winter 2002 Goal=64% 61 ° mqw 60% ------------------------ ............................. ................... ........... .. 55% ---...-—----- ----- ----- ----- ------- - ------------- . ---- ........ .... . ........................... 50% ................................................ .... ...... ................. .............. ........... ....... ... 46% .................................................................................. . ................................. 40% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2003 2003 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) ppm in Final Effluent ppm in Final Effluent 100 100 90 -- 90 1998 Permit Limit=100 ppm . .................................... .. ..... 1998 Permit Limit=60 ppm 60 58 S9 6. 62 61 60 60 56..... .57........ 50. ..---••................................................................._............... ....................... 50 .• . ..... --..... ............ .....-................ ............................................... 40 36 .....37....................38.......--..... ...... -- 40 .---..... ............ ....... .....- ..... -- .....----- ...... ................................--- U.--------- 32' 33 30 30 30 Secondary Standard Goal=30 ppm Secondary Standard Goal=30 ppm 20 ........... ................ . - ...- ------ --- ---•------- ---- ------ ------ ----- ------- ------------- 20 10 ------------------------------------------------------ -- --------•--- 10 .... ......---...----........................................... 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2003 2003 2003 2003 r Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Fiscal Year 2001 -02 Ending June 2002 Progress to Secondary Standards (Prior to July 17, 2002 Board decision) Month: December 2003 1 47% 32 /o Advanced Advanced Primary Ocean Pipeline Primary Ocean Pipeline Wme T—j7DOCI nfoctlon&C Mixed hlorination J3% 68% e.Aug.12,2002 Secondary Final Effluent: Secondary BOD = 72 ppm TSS = 51 ppm Bacteria Reduction: 99.999+% Goal: 99.3% Reduction Ocean Discharge Chlorine Limit Chlorine Level Permit Limit: Daily Maximum: 1.45 ppm Daily Maximum: ppm BOD = 100 ppm (Average of 8 Samples) TSS = 60 ppm Final Effluent: Final Effluent Goal: BOD = ppm BOD = 30 ppm TSS = ppm TSS = 30 ppm BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 01/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Adam Nazaroff, Associate Engineer III SUBJECT: LONG TERM FLOW MONITORING PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with ADS Environmental Services for Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, regarding the acceptance of a new insurance carrier for Errors and Omissions coverage, with no change to the total contract amount not to exceed $6,337,400. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) initiated a comprehensive program to reduce wet weather flows caused by rain dependent infiltration and inflow (I&I) as part of the implementation of 1999 Strategic Plan. One of the key elements of this program was the Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2. • The Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, consists of locating flow meters throughout OCSD's service area to continuously monitor flows for five years to identify and prioritize locations in the District's service area for projects to reduce I&I. • The current Professional Services Agreement (PSA) requires that ADS Environmental Services carry Errors and Omissions insurance from a California admitted insurer. Errors and Omissions insurance generally protects OCSD from design errors that may occur for capital projects. The types of services that ADS is performing under the current contract are not related to design and construction that is typically covered under Errors and Omissions insurance. • ADS's insurance carrier, Lloyd's of London, is not a California admitted insurer. Staff recommends waiving the requirement that the carrier for Errors and Omissions insurance coverage be licensed to do business in California, and accept a non- admitted carrier. With a company of the strength of Lloyd's of London, risk of failure of the insurance company is slight. This has been reviewed, approved and recommended by the District's insurance broker/advisor and District's general counsel. Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1 r PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Amendment No 1 on November 6, 2001, for additional data collection and conversion of the mapping database to Geographic Information System format at a cost of S25,000. Amendment No. 2 on November 19, 2003, for additional flow meter relocations and data analysis at a cost of S125.000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This amendment will not change the contract amount. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) This Amendment does not change the contract total dollar amount. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the amendment. Not approving the amendment will require ADS to obtain Errors and Omission insurance or they will be in default of the current contract. ADS has indicated that Errors and Omissions coverage from a different carrier other than the one it presently has in effect would pose an unreasonable financial burden on its overhead costs. CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt. ATTACHMENTS PSA Status Report AN:sa H:\wp.dta\dept\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Reports\0104\Item 9(d).ads Env Services-REVISED Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Long Term Flow Monitoring Program Job No. J-73-2 Total Project Budget: $7,074,400 Consultant: ADS Environmental, Inc. Start Date of Project: October 26, 2000 Date Amendment Description Cost Accumulated Costs Long Term Flow Monitoring Program including identification of monitoring sites; installation of 10/25/00 Original PSA flow monitors; and flow data collection and $6,187,400 $ 6,187,400 maintenance of flow meters for a period of 5 years *Amendment Additional data collection and conversion of 11/06/01 No 1 mapping database (GIS format). $25,000 $6,212,400 11/17/03 Amendment No. Additional flow meter relocations and data $125,000 $6,337,400 2 analysis Proposed Amendment No. Waive Requirement for E&O insurance. N/A $6,337,400 *General Manager Approval AN:sa EDMS 003761669 Revised 091703 r `OJN` SNIr/Oa II =` ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 90 F, h January 21, 2004 phone: (714)962-2411 fax: To the Chair and Members (714)962-0356 of the Board of Directors www.ocsd.com mailing address: Subject: Board Letter P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley.CA 92728-8127 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional Street address:10844 Ellis Avenue information on any of the items, please call me. Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) Award Given to OCSD Member Agencies I am pleased to announce that the District has received the AMSA Excellence in • Management Award. The award is for the following six areas where the District has Cities achieved excellent management practices: Strategic Plan, Biosolids EMS. Right- Anaheim sizing. Financial and budgetary practices, Win-Win Partnerships, and Watershed- Brea based Initiatives. The award will be presented at the upcoming AMSA conference Buena Park Cypress From Crisis to Opportunity...Strengthening Your Utility's Assets on February 4 Fountain Valley in Santa Monica. Fullerton Garden Grove Huntington Beach The award is non-monetary and valid for three years. Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Governmental Finance Officers Association Award Newport Beach Orange Placentia In December 2003, the District was notified that it has received the Government Santa Ana Finance Officers Association (FOA) Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the Seal Beach Stanton FY 2003-04 Budget. This is the eight consecutive year the District has earned this Tustin award. Villa Park Yorba Linda In order to receive this award, the budget document must be rated "proficient" in all County of Orange four of the following categories: Sanitary Districts . A policy document Costa Mesa • A financial plan Midway City . An operations guide Water Districts • A communications device Irvine Ranch The GFOA states that this award represents a significant achievement by the entity. Since the inception of GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program in 1984, approximately 900 entities have received the Award. GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving 14,000 government financial professionals throughout North America. To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. W e r Board of Directors 9Q Page 2 )N M January 21, 2004 Crow-Winthrop Development Status As was reported to you in December, the Court of Appeal-Fourth Appellate District ruled fully in favor of the District in CWDLP's challenge to our Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Ordinance. The Court rejected all the arguments propounded by the developer and held that the Ordinance was valid in all respects and particularly was not in violation of Prop 218. On Jan.16, 2004, the office of General Counsel received notice of a Petition to the Supreme Court, filed by CWDLP, asking the Court to hear its plea and decide the case. General Counsel advises that, in his opinion, the likelihood of the Court granting a hearing is slight. CSDA's Governance Series I have attached an announcement for two governance series workshops sponsored by the California Special Districts Association. The first is New Board Member and Trustee Training and the second is How to be an Effective Leader. There are two sessions scheduled for each workshop; February 10 at Ontario, CA and February 19 at Rancho Cordova, CA. Registration information is included in the announcement. GWRS Community Outreach Activities With construction under way on various components of the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System, OCSD and Orange County Water District (OCWD) staff members have implemented an extensive community outreach program to keep neighbors informed of construction activities. We recognize that construction can be disruptive to our neighbors and we are committed to ensuring that we're doing everything possible to minimize any impacts. As part of the construction for the Groundwater Replenishment System a new Southern California Edison substation was built to provide power to the future plant. The substation is located on OCWD property along Ward Street. Two new power poles were also installed on Ward Street. Recently, several neighbors have expressed disappointment and outrage that the substation and power poles are visible from their neighborhood. Staff is coordinating a meeting between the neighbors and Southern California Edison on Saturday, January 24 to hear their concerns and work toward solutions to camouflage the substation. OCSD and OCWD are working hard to be a good neighbor while we build water and wastewater facilities to serve the needs of the community. If your constituents have questions about the GWR System, they can call the information line at 714-378-3351 or visit the Web site at www.gwrsystem.com. • `OJN`.� SANII,,l ON W O p 1 Board of Directors = Page 3 January 21, 2004 CrN 7N Seventh Annual City and Aclency Collection Facilities O&M Survey and Outreach Program The Operations and Maintenance department is kicking off our seventh annual City and Agency Collection Facilities O&M Survey and Outreach Program. The purposes of this program are: • To gather and publish an annual report and executive summary based on a comprehensive O&M issues survey of our member cities and agencies for fiscal year 2002-2003, • To formally meet with each of our member cities and agencies Public Works managers and staff to further increase our mutual knowledge and understanding of local and regional collection system issues, and • To discuss regional issues and regulations affecting the owners and operators of the public wastewater collection system infrastructure. Because of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's implementation of the new Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) on April 26, 2002, we are including several WDR-related questions in this year's survey. The major elements of the WDR require all sewage dischargers in the OCSD service area to: • Develop a Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) emergency response, reporting, notification and management plan; • Develop and implement a fats, oil and grease (FOG) control and public education plan; • Develop the legal authority and ordinances necessary to implement the FOG control program, to ensure proper design, construction and installation of new or rehabilitated collector sewers and laterals, to control inflow and infiltration; • Develop and implement a written Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) that includes a sewer rehabilitation plan which identifies and prioritizes structural deficiencies, capacity issues, and funding mechanisms, and specifies short- and long-term rehabilitation actions to address each deficiency. This year will be capturing all the survey data in a relational database so we will be able to do more detailed analyses of the survey information. The Sanitation District isn't required to do this project, but since we began this program in 1997, it has been welcomed as a valuable resource both internally and externally. This is a unique report, in that most regional wastewater agencies don't gather or publish this kind of material. In the past few years, we've received positive feedback from many organizations, including USEPA, who said that this is a one-of- a-kind effort nationwide and provides some of the most comprehensive data they have seen. If you have any questions about the report, would like a copy of last year's report, or have suggestions on how we can improve this program next year, please contact the 4�J�`r S�NI/�r'oy t � o = 9 Board of Directors .A Page 4 olf�tiq a�, January 21, 2004 Regional Assets and Services Division Manager Nick Arhontes at 714-593-7210, by FAX at 714-962-3071, or by e-mail at narhontes@ocsd.com; or Principal Staff Analyst, Patrick McNelly, at 714-593-7163, or by e-mail at pmcnelly@ocsd.com. EPA Issues Final Action Plan Responding to the NRC Biosolids Report Recommendations The Clean Water directs EPA to periodically review its biosolids regulations. Consistent with this requirement, EPA commissioned the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences (NRC) to independently review the technical basis of the chemical and microbial standards for biosolids applied to land. The NRC report, Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices, concludes there is no scientific evidence that the federal biosolids regulations have failed to protect human health, and recommends additional scientific work be conducted to better understand the potential for adverse human health impacts. On December 31, 2003, EPA released its final response to the NRC 2002 report on the federal biosolids regulations. EPA's response identifies 15 pollutants that will undergo a more refined risk assessment and risk characterization to determine whether regulatory controls are necessary. The identification of the 15 pollutants does not mean that EPA has concluded that these pollutants in biosolids will adversely affect human health or the environment. Some, or perhaps even all, of these pollutants may not be present in concentrations that warrant regulation. EPA's response also identified 14 projects to enhance its ongoing research and outreach activities. EPA stated that these 14 projects and associated activities will strengthen the biosolids program by improving EPA's ability to address the public's concern related to agricultural use of biosolids. OCSD staff is reviewing EPA's response and will provide comments on the various proposals. Implementation of the Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan The Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan (Plan) was received and filed at the December Board meeting. Staff is now moving forward to implement the various elements of the plan consistent with the Board's commitment to the biosolids environmental management system (EMS). Staff will be asking for the help of a public Biosolids Advisory Committee (BAC) to review and make recommendations on the selection of future biosolids management options. Specifically, the BAC members will be asked to provide their perspective on proposals that will be solicited from biosolids vendors over the next several months. OCSD staff will consult with the BAC in preparing its recommendations regarding biosolids management contracts for approval by the Board of Directors in April 2004. The BAC will also be asked to make recommendations regarding the role the public should play in advising OCSD as the Plan is implemented overtime. The process for creating the BAC will start with sending an announcement to a large number of interested stakeholders on OCSD's mailing lists directing them to a BAC application on the OCSD website. Staff will review the submitted applications and 4�JN`r SAMII�T/°b � � O 9 Board of Directors Page 5 9Oi .4 January 21, 2004 select up to eight members of the public representing a variety of backgrounds and experience (e.g. environmental, economic, industry, regulatory, service area representation, etc.) to serve on the BAC. BAC meetings will be held over the next three months to educate the group on biosolids issues. The group will then be asked to assist staff in reviewing proposals submitted by biosolids technology vendors and preparing a recommendation for OCSD's future biosolids management options for consideration by the Board of Directors at its April meeting. Secondary Treatment Status Report All operationally available secondary treatment facilities are online. Staff continues to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards, which are 30/30 ppm TSS and BOD. The final effluent is a blend of 68% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, 2002, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During December 2003, the final effluent averaged 34 ppm TSS and 61 ppm BOD. Disinfection Update Our final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility disinfection system, which has now been in operation since August 2002. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, entercocci bacteria and viruses. The permit criteria is 1000 MPN/100 mL for a total coliform at the 3 mile offshore line. December 2003 results for total coliform averaged about 1,080 MPN/100 mL, which is substantially below the final effluent of 180,000 MPN/100 mL. The 180,000 MPN/100 mL goal was developed by using the 180:1 dilution the outfall provided. The final effluent had a maximum 0.65 ppm chlorine residual averaged over eight hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm daily maximum compliance limit. Additional disinfection data is reported to the Web @ www.odsd.com. Articles of Interest I have also included several additional published articles that you might find interesting. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. az ��, �� Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt H:\DEPT\ADMIMGM\LETTERS TO THE BOARD\04\012804 BOARD LTR.DOC Attachments CSDA's Governance Series �©OD b New Board Member and Trustee Training - - A workshop for newly elected or appointed special district officials How to be an Effective Leader - Y` I1 A workshop for special district board chairs and presidents New board members can mingle with their veteran peers, and board leaders can impart their wisdom to the next generation. Attend a breakout specific to your training t • level, then come together for issues of common concern. Don't miss this opportunity to network and learn! t �� A Personal Commitment to YOUR special district! Leading a special district as a newly seated or veteran-governing official is both exciting and challenging. By working as a catalyst and mapmaker for your agency,you have accepted the responsibility of representing your constituents and customers in the most effective and professional manner possible,this will demand that you acquire or maintain ' p the necessary skills to govern a special district. aim This day of trainings has been designed specifically for special district board members and board chairs/presidents in order to provide the cools, background and overall knowledge necessary to help navigate this tough terrain and be an effective leader. Unique to this series of trainings is that the programs have been developed by special districts for special districts. Both veteran governing officials and newly seated directors should take advantage of this opportunity to come together at this all-new educational experience. Breakouts will accommodate both groups—with a combined luncheon for networking opportunities. Structure of the Day General -- ^. _. Special DISCI JLE ' Administrator _ . : Certification • . . Program to _ 0 These courses ane approved(or SDA�credrt The " Special District Administrator Certificate is a r,3 voluntary designation sought by individuals who y stave to be the"best in the business" Certifica- tionhelps document and recognize your knowledge,skills and capabilities. ' CSDA Special District Governance Academy ir.• GOVERNANCE ACADEMY c sn n ---_ --- CSDA's Special District Governance Academy is the advanced training that follows this-beginning' program.The academy,which was created to provide governance training to special district officials,consists of 4 curriculum-based courses including[ho following; Governance Foundation-, Setting Direction/Community Leadership Board's Role in Finance&Fiscal Accountability Board's Role in Human Resources -, The New Board MemberTnining and How to be an Effective Leader programs are meant to give artendees an introduction and overview of these topics.The academy will take the major _ components one step further to deliver a more m-depth understanding. t - Istntion 8:00 am 8:30 am eminar 8:30 am—4:00 prn " ' unch Included 12:00 pm 1:00 pm New Board Member and Trustee Training 1 A workshop for newly elected or appointed special district officials A newly elected or appointed official should begin their position on a special district board with a solid understanding of what the role entails as well asa b complete understanding of the laws that must be followed.CSDA's New Board Member Training provides attendees with this valuable information and the tools they need to effectively govern and advocate on their district's behalf. Attendees will leave this workshop understanding: • The major legislative issues that affect • special districts(Prop.13,ERAF,LAFCO, state fiscal relationships,etc.) The basics of special districts including their history,structure,organizational differences, funding mechanisms and the role they play in communities • A board member's roles and responsibilities • Making and approving appropriate district. pajicy • Community leadership • Strategic thinking Developing and participating in the board's vision and purpose • How to be an advocate for special districts • The intergovernmental issues and - relationships between cities,counties,special districts, schools,LAFCO and stare government ! Trends in special districts ,j The laws that govern special districts and their board members • Ralph M.Brown Act • Conflict of interest ethics laws ;1 Being a board member is a big job. Our cost-effective training for newly elected or appointed special district board members can help make it a lot easier. Get the information and training that ALL board members should have...REGISTER TODAY! 0 "A community is like a ship,everyone ought to be prepared to take the helm." Henrik Ibsen, playwright Registration please make copies of form for additional attendees 0 MEMBER - $170 NON-MEMBER - $210 0 Ontario,CA- February 10 RANCHO CORDOVA - February 19 Name/Title: District: Address: City: State: Zip: Tel: Email: Payment: 0 Check 0 Visa 0 Mastercard Acct Name: Acct #: Expiration Date: Authorized Signature: Other Needs: 0 Vegetarian Option Breakout ��� Confirmed Panel of Locations Speakers The speakers consist of veteran board member. _ general managers of special districts,and an experienced attorney on the panel. 1 . • :11 •1• 111 11 David Aranda is the General.Manager for Stallion . 11 Springs Community Services District,president of the Special District,Risk Management Authority (SDRMA)and sits as a director for a Joint Powers Authority and an associate director for name of the district here Conservation District. Jerry Gladbach is the immediate past-president 11, of the Association of California Water Agencies ; (ACWA). He has also been on the board of ;� "; y y directors of the Castaic LakeWater A enc since p " s tt{t rc Yj+*f �t4 Ywr� `R.v3f g 1985 and the President of that board since 1987. k� r � �}aAlty ri a et Catherine Smith is the Executive Director of 3 California Special Districts Association and has over 13 years of experience with special districts and local govcrnmcnt Smith is also a current residing board member of the Arden Park Recreation and Park District_- k Dr.Charles(Chuck)Beesley was the General Manager of the Contra Costa Mosquito & Vector Control District, retiring in March 2001 after twenty-seven years in public service Upon retirement, he began a new career as a - consultant to special districts, utilizing his Y-� management skills and experience to facilitate planning and team building worksho rr s, r s Ruthann Ziegler with Meyers Nave joined the firm ?.; in 2003 from Kronick,Moskovitz Tiedemann t &Girard,bringing over 20 years of experience • in public law with municipalities and special. districts. Ms.Ziegler represents clients in matters a affecting local governance and decision-making, ranging from day-to-day operations to long-term policy dsiri�s. s�, How to Be An Effective Leader ' A tvorkshop for special distnct board chairs and presidents Attendees will leave the workshop knowing how to: y Create an environment that promotes ,y-S, working as a team y Properly conduct the district's business in public y Effectively prepare for the meeting ➢ Respond to community input and feedback Facilitate effective deliberation Best manage time during meetings 3 • Follow parliamentary procedures i Establish protocol Ensure compliance with bylaws,policies and legal requirements include the Brown Act updates and recent changes,conflict of s interest/ethics laws) Additionally,this workshop will detail the chair/ president's role in community relations and overall advocacy on behalf of the district they represent. Included will be information ori. Building& maintaining community aijpport • Establishing effective communications � systems Establishing sound media relations practices t Engaging in necessary governmental j relations&advocacy efforts • Ensuring accountability for community leadership efforts A leader's job is to look into the future,and see the organization not as it is,but as it con become. Registration please make copies of form for additional attendees 0 MEMBER - $170 O NON-MEMBER - $210 0 Ontario,CA- February 10 0 RANCHO CORDOVA-February 19 Name/Title: District: Address: City: State: zip: Tel: Email: Payment: 0 Check 0 Visa 0 Mastercard Acct Name: Acct #: Expiration Date: Authorized Signature: Other Needs: 0 Vegetarian Option Breakout =s 2 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART 130 �j L•Fr- �Z A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: January 8, 2004 RE: Proposed "OCSD/OCWD Open Campus" This opinion is submitted in response to your recent request concerning legal issues of concern that could arise by removing the existing physical barriers between the two adjacent properties of the Districts. In particular, it is my understanding that one member of our Board of Directors has made inquiry concerning the liability issues, if any, that could be presented anew if mutual access to the respective parcels was granted. In furtherance of this, I have reviewed the legal opinion, dated December 11, 2003, issued by Joel Kuperberg, General Counsel to OCWD. I concur with Mr. Kuperberg's opinion in all respects, particularly in the first instance, that there is no legal restriction or prohibition about removing fences, walls or other physical barriers from our property. While OCWD is governed by the specific provisions contained in the Orange County Water District Act, that does not apply to OCSD. However, the County Sanitation District Act, Health and Safety Code Section 4740 is virtually identical in that it provides that the District may own, control and manage any interest in real or personal property necessary or convenient for the construction, maintenance and operation of sewerage, system and sewage disposal, or treatment plant. This provision clearly provides the legal authority for the District to determine, in its own judgment, the manner by which its property is utilized. This would include erecting or removing access barriers, and granting access to the property to other users. While I do not believe a resolution containing findings is necessary, I see no impediment in doing so. If OCWD chooses to do so, it would provide a better record if the District, in fact, had such a resolution on file specifically authorizing water district personnel and their agents to enter the District. As for liability, it is our opinion that there is nothing out of the ordinary that changes the liability exposure to the District. As the owner of real property that is used by employees, vendors, contractors, and guests, the District has certain threshold areas of responsibility, namely to keep the premises free from known dangerous conditions. The District would not be expanding bases or causes for liability, but would only January 8, 2004 Page 2 perhaps see an increase in the usage, and thus perhaps a slight increase in the potential for an injury claim. That would simply have to be categorized as one of the costs of doing business. I do believe that the respective staffs should develop a definitive program outlining the parameters of points of access, limitation on hours, personnel authorized to use it, mutual identification and other security issues. Lastly, because OCWD is acting as the contracting agency between the two, for purposes of construction of the GWRS facilities, they have the immediate contact and control over the onsite vendors and contractors. As such, it is probably appropriate that in the course of adopting the resolution, we expressly grant to OCWD and its officers, agents, employees and business invitees a license to enter onto OCSD property for purposes of implementing the objectives of the GWRS. Otherwise, this would not be necessary for any occasional visitor, including vendors or contractors who have come onto our site. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:ilo January 2004 Orange County Clean Water n the Cutting g Edge . . Congressman Dana Rohrabacher The bad news is that Southern feet of clean water for Orange California could face water short- County. Experts say the end-prod- aves in the future.The good news is uct of the GWRS is a supply drink- th:it there is no county in California ing water that is eminently cleaner Dana Rohrabacher more prepared to keep a stable and and more saline free than the wa- adequate water supply than Orange ter Orange County currently re- County. ceives from the Colorado River. Orange County's not-so-secret The local commitment to The GWRS is not yet com- weapon against drought, water GWRS is overwhelming, and the plete, but will be online soon. shortages,and dwindling allocations majority of the funding for this vi- Needless to say, I will continue to of Colorado River water is the tal project comes directly from Or- do what it takes to ensure that Or- Groundwater Replenishment Sys- ange County. There is also federal ange County gets its fair share back tem (GWRS) in Fountain Valley. funding. However, the federal con- from the federal government. Al- Fur the last decade,GWRS has been tribution comes grudgingly. Each most since the inception of the developing break-through, cutting year, the Orange County congres- GWRS, I have gone before Con- edee water-tiltration technologies. sional delegation has to fight to gress and requested that Congress This technology involves a three- ensure that GWRS is funded. Or- give Orange County the support it stave purification process in which ange County is what is known as a needs to complete GWRS and pro- undrinkable water is made drinkable "donor county," meaning it pays tect Orange County's water supply. through micro-filtration,double os- out more in tax dollars than it re- In the coming year, my colleagues niosis. and ultra-violet light screen- ceives back from the federal gov- from the Orange County congres- ing. So impressive is this system that ernment in services. if it weren't for sional delegation and I \ti ill work scientists from water-starved na- our intervention, Orange County to make sure that Orange County's tions around the world routinely would continue to be bilked of its drinking water supply is ample and visit our GWRS to study and ob- tax dollars. In this case, however, safe. serve the machinery and purification were able to wrest $4 million dol- processes that will eventually pro- lars from federal coffers for this ride hundreds of thousands of acre- vital water purification system. 5 O LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET.SUITE 8000 ■ ORANGE,CA 92868-4760 ■(714)558-7000 ■ FAX(714)835-7787 DIRECT DIAL: (714)564.2605 DIRECT FAX: (714)565-2505 E-MAIL: TLW@WSS-LAW.COM January 7, 2004 Bradley R. O'Brien, Esq. Assistant U.S. Attorney United States Department of Justice Environmental Enforcement Section 301 Howard Street, Suite 1050 San Francisco, Ca. 94105 Re: Orange County Sanitation District Dear Brad: On behalf of the Orange County Sanitation District, I want to thank you for forwarding the initial draft of the proposed Consent Decree that would be utilized by and among the Parties in conjunction with the issuance of a new NPDES Permit which does not provide for a waiver of secondary treatment requirements under Clean Water Act Section 301(h). The District's key Staff members and myself have now had an opportunity to do the preliminary review, and I submit this simply to give you a time schedule for the next several weeks relative to actions to be taken. Specifically, our next Board of Directors Meeting is January 28, 2004, and that will be the first opportunity that we will have to present this to the Board, together with the comments and recommendations of the Staff and this Office. In preparation for that, we have a series of three particular meetings to address component parts of the Decree, so that we will be able to give a full review and recommendation to the Board at the January 28th meeting. Based on that, we would like to schedule a meeting for either Tuesday, February 10th or Thursday, February 12th at either your Office or EPA's. We are planning to have fewer representatives, but the Directors of Engineering, Operations, and Technical Services will be in attendance, together with Jim Colston, who is managing the Permit renewal project, and myself. I would appreciate if you could coordinate with the people at your end who would or should be in attendance, to see if those dates work, and let me know. TERRY C.ANDRUS■STEPHEN J.BEATON■M.LOIS BOBAK■CAROLINE A.BYRNE■JOHN E CAVANAUGH■GARY W.CROCKETT TAM)S.CROSBY•KIM LT.DAWLEY■JAMES M.DONICH■CRAIG G.FARRINGTON■JOSEPH W.FORBATH■RICHARD W.HELMS BRADLEY R.HOGIN■DOUGLAS C.HOLLAND a DDIS E.JEFFREY■ROBERTA A.KRAUS■MAGDALENA LONA-WIANT■MARK M.MONACHINO LAURA A.MORGAN■THOMAS F.NIXON■SUSAN ARAIvIESH PRICE a BARBARA RAILEANU N JASON S.RETTERER■OMAR SANDOVAL JOHN R.SHA W 0 GREGORY E.SIMONIAN 0 KENNARD R.SMART,JR■DANIEL K.SPRADLIN■THOMAS L.WOODRUFF Bradley R. O'Brian, Esq. January 7, 2004 Page 2 As for the document itself, I would tell you that we have a few questions, but there is certainly nothing in the proposed Decree that we would describe as a "deal breaker" or that is causing a great deal of concern to the District's Technical and Management Staffs. We look forward to meeting with you, in order that this can continue to proceed on an orderly basis leading to completion at the earliest possible date. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A Professional Corporation THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL - OCSD TLW:pjy cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. R. Ghirelli Mr. D. Ludwin Mr. R. Ooten Mr. J. Colston Gary Hess, Esq. Mr. K. Lindstrom \179534\1 Message Page 1 of 2 Tappan, Jean From: Cabral, Jennifer Sent: Thursday,January 08, 2004 7:15 AM To: EMT; 130 -Communications Services Cc: 'Eric Sapirstein (esap@ensresources.com)' Subject: Article of interest 1.7.2004 1.7.2004 LOS ANGELES Hike in Sewer Fees Is Planned By Eric Malnic, Times Staff Writer Sewer fee increases of$24 over the next four years have been proposed to pay for systemwide improvements needed, in part, to comply with stricter environmental regulations, officials said Monday. "The standards that we met are becoming more stringent," said David Bruns, who heads the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts' department of financial planning. "As they become more stringent,we have to construct facilities, and once they are constructed, we have to operate them." The sanitation districts—comprising 25 agencies working under a joint agreement—channel, process and dispose of sewage and wastewater for most of the county's cities and unincorporated areas, serving about 5.4 million people. The notable exception is Los Angeles,which has its own system that serves the entire city, plus most or all of Santa Monica, Culver City, Beverly Hills, El Segundo and several other communities. The sanitation districts'typical, single-family home sewage and wastewater bill now is about$84 a year, plus local collection fees from individual communities that raise the total to about$130 a year. The fees are paid as a part of property taxes. Bruns said that under the proposal by the districts' board of directors, that total would climb to about$136 in the 2004-05 fiscal year, rising another$6 a year to an eventual total of about$154 in 2007-08. He said the city of Los Angeles currently charges about$256 a year. The sanitation districts'costs are lower, Bruns said, because the county was more aggressive in getting federal funding for projects that the city has had to finance through user fees. Public hearings on the proposed fee increases will be held Feb. 11 at 1:30 p.m. at the districts' headquarters in Whittier. Bruns said that among the districts'improvement projects is a major upgrade at the main treatment facility in Carson. The new air filtration system will reduce odors emanating from the solid waste treatment system.The upgrade cost$400 million, "and it costs us an extra $10 million a year to operate," Bruns said. One of the planned projects is the addition of a third, 10-foot-diameter tunnel to carry effluent from the Carson plant to ocean-floor outlets about two miles off White Point in San Pedro. Bruns said that the two existing tunnels seem to be working well, but that because they're operating near capacity, neither can be shut down for inspection. "A third tunnel would give us a backup, so we could rotate them for maintenance," he said. The third tunnel, which would take a decade to design and build, would cost about$750 million, officials said. Jennifer Cabral 1/8/2004 Stormwater I Developing Equitable Fees Page 1 of 10 Hump The Journal for Surface Water Quality Professionals Abuut Current lviu{ SUI]S:rib2 ter M evis C:oIiendar FEATURES Gtu•sary Talk Irn:lye% AdtaLT Uz De vetopinCon tact th Search ap,vi(e fquitiblespr-oices B�YERStGUIDE Sffirmwater Fees StorrnCan What do customers perceive as "fair"? Setting rates that reflect the cost of providing service. By Grant Hoag When a city turns to billed stormwater fees in support of a new stormwater program, the issue of fairness will quickly arise. In fact, for many states the law requires that fairness be quantified and documented before the fees can be implemented. Often your city's need for new funds is the result of an increased emphasis on stormwater pollutants, and this can be problematic because, while old stormwater fees traditionally were based on runoff volume, new fees should be linked to pollutants in the runoff. This article describes the evaluation process used to calculate pollutant-based fees for stormwater programs. The illustrated values are based on the methodology supporting new stormwater fees for several major metropolitan areas in California. With this methodology, stormwater fees can be equitably billed to the parcels, creating the hydraulic and pollutant remediation burdens on your stormwater program. Background By evaluating the sources of pollutants of concern and the costs of their remediation, it is possible to create a nexus between the program costs and the stormwater service charges to individual parcels. This nexus usually places higher rates on commercial http://www.forester.net/sw_0401_developing.html 1/7/2004 Stormwater Developing Equitable Fees Page 2 of 10 CE�>SAVE THIS and industrial sites and lower costs on residential areas and parklands. Article XIII of the California Constitution provides that a documented nexus between the level of a fee and the city's cost of providing the service is required. It prohibits subsidies between customer classes, thus requiring that fees be determined for parklands and schools, and mandates that the affected customers must vote on and approve the fee. While this level of rigorous analysis and approval might not be required for funding the stormwater program in your city, the methodology developed here should be both instructive and helpful. Rate-Setting Process Unlike public water, gas, or electricity utilities, stormwater service to runoff dischargers is not voluntary and cannot be metered. As such, few stormwater-discharge customers see the need for charges, and higher-than-usual community resistance occurs when a city tries to create new stormwater utility fees. In this potentially hostile environment, it is vital to clearly document the need and equity of the fees. The documentation should demonstrate due diligence in the fee-development process, including addressing stakeholder concerns, searching for alternatives to fees, and justifying the need for fee-based funding. Finally, an emphasis on the nexus between the cost of services provided and the program benefits received is required. The technical steps of this nexus process are illustrated in Figure 1, and the steps shown in the figure are explained below. Assess Revenue Requirements. This step quantities the annual need for fee- based funding. Revenue requirements equal operating and maintenance (O&M) expenses, project- (capital-) related expenditures, and net nonoperating expenses. Total revenue sources can include fees, city interfund transfers, tax proceeds, and drawdowns on fund balances. The portion of the total revenue http://www.forester.net/sw_0401_developing.html 1/7/2004 Stormwater Developing Equitable Fees Page 3 of 10 Figure 1. derived from new-user fees depends on your Rate-Setting Process community's goals. The right selection of Assess Revenue funding sources will help secure Requirements community backing, i while the wrong one will ensure community Conduct Cost-of- resistance and Service Anaysis underfunding of a program. Develop Fee Conduct Cost-of- Structure Service Analysis. This step validates the rate-calculation procedure by Recommend identifying the nexus Fees between the cost of services and the benefits received. This is based on an estimate of stormwater runoff and pollutant loads from each property and the costs for disposal of runoff and remediation of pollutants. The results are unit rates useful in determining the fees for individual parcels. Develop Fee Structure. Stormwater fees (both the structure and the amount) can vary significantly among cities and states. Nationwide, a survey of 200 utilities indicated that roughly half are based on impervious area, one-quarter are based on a combination of impervious and gross area, and the remainder are based on other factors. Under new stormwater-discharge permits, pollutant abatement and remediation activities are a growing part of the stormwater costs. As such, the resulting new fees should include a pollutant-load element in the same way that wastewater fees to a restaurant typically have a high- strength component. Recommend Fees. The recommended fee structure must be based not only on equity but also on acceptability. If the fees are too complex to be understood, they are more likely to be rejected. A comparison of the proposed stormwater bills with those of other cities can increase the comfort of the elected officials. Appropriate fee exemptions, credits, and dispute mechanisms can also provide a boost to acceptability. The methodology presented below is similar to that recommended by the Water Environment Federation for the development of wastewater rates. It is based on customer http://www.forester.net/sw_0401_developing.html 1/7/2004 Stormwater Developing Equitable Fees Page 4 of 10 discharge characteristics and the functional cost components of , runoff and pollutant remediation budgets. Runoff-Load and Program-Cost Factors To develop nexus-based fees, we use two load factors to cross- reference stormwater program costs with customer charges. The two load factors are stormwater volume and runoff pollutants, as identified in the stormwater-discharge permit. Each is explained below. Stormwater Volume. The historical stormwater service of channeling runoff and discharging the flows will always remain one of the key services of any stormwater utility. As such, the current funding mechanisms should remain in place, even as the new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permits add pollutant remediation tasks. It is easier to add incremental new fees to supplement existing funding than to replace the current revenue program with completely new—and higher—fees. Nonetheless, inclusion of runoff volume, described here as hydraulic loading, in funding calculations is essential to retaining a complete perspective of a stormwater utility's funding needs. Pollutants of Concern. Pollutants of concern listed in a city's stormwater-discharge permit can generally be classified into the following categories: . Trash . Hydrocarbons . Sediments . Nutrients Pathogens . Toxics Trash and other solids are predominately associated with residential and commercial detritus. Sediments from soil erosion are measured from suspended and settleable solids and are particularly common in agricultural areas. Pathogens, as measured by enterococcal, fecal, and total coliform, represent the potential for hazardous bacteria and viruses in the stormwater flows. These are especially common in first-flush rainfall events. Hydrocarbons represent the oil and grease loads in runoff, often from parking lots and roadways. Nutrients, as from fertilizers, are represented by phosphates, ammonia, and nitrates and come from landscaped and agricultural areas. Toxics are typically heavy metals, such as copper in brake dust, cadmium, mercury, and lead. It is important to identify the pollutants actually being remediated in your stormwater program. Although the six http://www.forester.net/sw_0401_developing.html 1/7/2004 Stormwater Developing Equitable Fees Page 5 of 10 stormwater-borne pollutants listed are undesirable, for equity's sake only the pollutants being prevented or remediated in your specific program should be included. The determination of the costs and loads associated with the runoff and pollutant factors is described in the following sections. Stormwater Utility Customers Identifying appropriate customer classifications for new stormwater service billing is problematic, as there is an incentive by billing staff to use existing water- or sewer-utility customer databases, which lack key stormwater dischargers, such as undeveloped lots, agricultural areas, and parks. Existing utility databases also lack parcel areas for each user. In contrast, typical tax-assessor databases contain most parcels in a service area and include data on parcel size and land use. As such, tax-assessor parcel data can be used effectively if consolidated into stormwater billing groups. The billing groups can be classified as follows: • Single-family parcels • Multifamily complexes • Commercial • Industrial • Landscaped • Undisturbed • Institutional (schools, parks, and local agencies) • Agricultural Figure 2 illustrates the .• proportion of land-use areas and billable ` parcel numbers for a tP typical city. i °^ i The biggest drawback , of tax-assessor data is �•» _ � - that it may not include tax-exempt institutional Click here for larger view land uses, such as schools, parks, and military bases. Data from those particular dischargers must be collected from other sources. In contrast, there are two land uses within the tax-assessor data that may best be excluded from billable customers; freeways and military bases will likely have their own stormwater permits and would therefore be excluded from funding responsibility for your city's permit. Finally, local streets should be considered as stormwater conveyance facilities and can be excluded from billing along with storm drains, canals, and street-meridian grassy swales. http://www.forester.neUsw_0401_developing.html 1/7/2004 Stormwater Developing Equitable Fees Page 6 of 10 Evaluation of `""'^ °"`,""'" "x` """•"""' Stormwater Program x•..�xccrc c.,s Costs Stormwater program budgets are typically developed by O&M and other activities, including capital improvements, Click here for larger view engineering, flood control, permitting/inspection; and program management. Figure 3 illustrates the proportional cost of each activity. Activities Versus Loadings. Unfortunately, the cross- referencing for fees is based on loading factors rather than activities, so it is necessary to identify the functionally based objective of each activity. For example, flood control activities can be allocated primarily to the hydraulic function, while permitting and inspection activities are allocated primarily to toxic and pathogen controls. Figure 4 illustrates the reallocation of activity costs to stormwater loading factors. It includes the hydraulic factor and the pollutants of concern. Certain activities benefit some but not all customer classifications. For example, street-sweeping activities serve residential and commercial customers but no others to any significant degree. As such, before allocating activity-based costs to loading factors, it first may be appropriate to segregate the cost of any activity that benefits solely one or two customer classifications. The Myth of Project Grants. In developing tunding for stormwater programs, a variety of revenue sources must be sought. These include developer impact fees, permit and inspection fees, and federal funding for planning programs and pilot studies. It is important, however, not to overestimate the benefits of project grants in the hope that these will significantly reduce or eliminate the need for new stormwater fees because most new stormwater program costs are for ongoing pollutant remediation activities that will be ineligible for grant program funds used for capital-project construction. Stormwater Loads From Parcel-Based Customers This section develops parcel-based stormwater loading factors. The evaluation of the stormwater loads should be limited to billable customers and should not attempt to estimate the total regional levels of hydraulic and pollutant loads. The main reason for limiting the evaluation is that total regional loads are both difficult to determine and irrelevant with respect to the data http://www.forester.net/sw_0401_developing.html 1/7/2004 Stormwater Developing Equitable Fees Page 7 of 10 needs for a stormwater rate structure for billing. The development of hydraulic and pollutant load factors is simplified by the creation of the equivalent residential parcel unit (ERPU). An ERPU value of 1.0 is defined as the runoff and pollutant load from a standard, residential, single-family dwelling parcel. The ERPUs for all other parcels are described in relationship to this standard residential parcel unit. For example, if the stormwater load from an industrial lot is 30 times that of a standard residential parcel, it would have a billing factor of 30. Runoff Loads Using Table 1. Runoff Coefficients Coefficients. by Land Use Stormwater runoff Parcel class Runoff Coefficient volume is estimated using land-use type Agricultural 0.10 and parcel size. Undisturbed 0.30 Billable stormwater Single Family 0.55 runoff volume is Multifamily 0.69 estimated using a Landscaped Q.80 basic water-resource Commercial 0.81 planning concept: Q = Industrial 0 87 cia. The equation says that the runoff volume Q from a parcel equals the runoff coefficient (cross-referenced to land use) multiplied by the rainfall intensity of a standard 0.75-in. storm multiplied by the drainage area. Table 1, based on values developed for the County of San Diego in California, lists the runoff coefficients for this standard storm. Not coincidentally, the land-use classification for each parcel iS generally available from the local tax assessor's office, while runoff coefficients are available from many city, county, or regional planners. These regional planners may also have parcel land-use information based on parcel layers of a geographic information system (GIS). Note that GIS data might lack the legal billing basis of a tax assessor's database. In addition, defensible parcel-level impermeable-area data can be difficult and expensive to collect and might best be limited to very large or unusual parcels. As shown, agricultural areas in southern California have the lowest runoff coefficients and industrial parcels have the highest. Landscaped areas with frequent irrigation are estimated to have high runoff levels. Pollutant Coefficients. There have been a variety of stormwater studies on many of the six pollutants of concern. For stormwater fee development in California, the most relevant information has been developed by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Specific toxic, nutrient, and http://www.forester.net/sw_0401_developing.html 1/7/2004 Stormwater Developing Equitable Fees Page 8 of 10 sediment discharges by land use were identified in "Modeling Stormwater Mass Emissions to the Southern California Bight" (Drew Ackerman and Kenneth Schiff. Journal of Environmental Engineering, April 2003). The pathogen load factors are from Modeling Arid, Urbanized Watersheds: Part ll, Bacterial Runoff(Ackerman, Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, December 2001). Trash and hydrocarbon values are based on the best professional judgment using empirical observations. Based on the previously described Table 2. Pollutant Coefficients stormwater-program by Land Use costs, the loading factors for each of the Parcel Class Pollutant Coefficient pollutants can be Undisturbed 0.10 averaged into a single Landscaped 0.90 pollutant coefficient for Single Family 1.00 each parcel land-use Multifamily 2.10 type. The unit pollutant Commercial 2.10 load for different land Industrial 2.50 uses, when cross- Agricultural 2.60 referenced to the pollutant loading level from a single-family residential parcel, resulted in the pollutant coefficients for the land uses listed in Table 2. As shown, undisturbed lands have the lowest pollutant coefficient (10% of the ERPU rate), while standard (row-crop) agriculture has the highest. Stormwater Loadings i for Parcel Classifications • r ;; To determine the proportion of program costs to be borne by a parcel class, the calculated hydraulic and pollutant loading Click here for larger view coefficients are multiplied by the areas of each parcel land use. The results are illustrated in Figure 5. Note that the hydraulic discharges from certain land uses are significantly different from the pollutant loads. It is also informative to contrast these allocations with the parcel areas illustrated in Figure 2. The results demonstrate that the allocation of costs for pollutant remediation is significantly different from the runoff-based http://www.forester.net/sw_0401_developing.html 1/7/2004 Stormwater Developing Equitable Fees Page 9 of 10 allocations. As such, the costs of complying with the new NPDES permits cannot, in the case of California areas, be equitably billed to stormwater program customers using the historically popular runoff coefficient-based fees. Stormwater Fees by Parcel Classifications The final step in developing stormwater fees is to divide the total cost by the total area of each parcel-based land use, thus calculating the unit fee based on area. These results are listed in the stormwater fee structure in Table 3. As shown, equitable area-based fees can vary from $0.12/1,000 ft.2 for undisturbed areas to $2.73/1,000 ft.2 for industrial parcels. Table 3 also lists flat Table 3. Stormwater Fees rather than variable by Land Use fees for single-family Flat Fees per Parcel Cast per Year residential parcels. Single Family(ERPU) $6.83 Fee structures may be Variable Area-Based Fees Fee per 1,DOD ft! simplified when Undisturbed $012 warranted by the cost- Landscaped $0 61 of-service findings or Agricultural $0.96 by community needs. Multifamily $1.54 Simplifying a rate structure can increase Commercial $2.38 its acceptability while Industrial $2.73 retaining its cost-of- service equity. The simplifications include replacing variable-parcel areas for residential customers with a class average and consolidating the land-use classifications into a handful of billing classes. These simplifications can be done equitably if supported by the cost-of-service findings. For example, a review of the single- family parcel sizes may indicate that a significant majority of these customers do not vary materially from an average size. If true, it may be possible to use flat-fee bills for all single-family parcels. As residential parcel types can represent up to 90% of a community, an enormous simplification of the billing process is possible when warranted by homogenous parcel sizes. In a similar fashion, if it is possible to consolidate a range of parcel-based land-use classifications into a handful of stormwater billing classes without a loss of billing equity, it should be done to promote ease of customer understanding, administrative convenience, and practicality. As a general rule of thumb qualified by the accuracy of the data, a stormwater bill may be equitable when it is ±10-20% of the cost-of-service findings. Guest author Grant Hoag, P.E. is a specialist in financial http://www.forester.net/sw_O4O1_developing.html 1/7/2004 Stormwater Developing Equitable Fees Page 10 of 10 consulting for stormwater and other municipal utilities and city governments. He is manager of financial services with Brown and Caldwell in Irvine, CA. SW January/February 2004 7. Home + About+ Subscribe + News + Calendar + Glossary Talk + Images + Advertise + Contact Us + Search + Register+ Services Distributed Energy I Erosion Control Magazine I MSW Management Magazine Grading&Excavation Contractor I StormCon I ForesterPress I Forester Communications 200_-_2003 Fgrester Communications,Inc. http://www.forester.net/sw_0401_developing.html 1/7/2004 New Board Member Orientation OCSD Plant No. 1, Boardroom February 18, 2004 5-7 P.M. Agenda • Welcome and Introductions • Vision for OCSD Blake Anderson, General Manager • Director's Handbook and Guide to Business Greg 44ath Penny Kyle, Board Secretary?? Tom Woodruff, General Counsel • Employee Relations, Training and Safety Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources • Information Technology Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology • Treatment Plant Operations and Maintenance Robert Ooten, Director of O&M • The Regulatory Environment Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services • Capital Improvement Construction Projects Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering • Media Relations and Website News Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager • Budget and Finance Overview Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer • General Discussion and Closing Blake Anderson, General Manager mAgraphicsldocs1021804 orientation aganda.doc Los Angeles Times: Hahn Bans Panelists From Contractor Talks Page 1 of 2 —JL M:or,An_gcics Cimc-6 .come LOS ANGELES Hahn Bans Panelists From Contractor a d v e r t i s e m e n t Talks Important Mayor takes action after audit criticizes Airport gains in the 6attle against Commission for poor business practices, saying heart disease citizen oversight must be protected. By Patrick McGreevy and Jessica Garrison Test yourself Times Staff Writers on cardiac latest in January 6, 2004options Three weeks after the city controller criticized the Airport Commission for allowing its members to sit in on initial interviews with potential contractors, Los Angeles Mayor James K. Hahn ordered a citywide ban on the practice. Hahn issued his directive on the eve of a City Council hearing to discuss the findings of City Controller Laura Chick's audit of the airport department and to consider reforms in the city's contracting system. f, Chick's audit, released Dec. 1S, criticized Los Angeles World Airports for poor business practices, including its habit of allowing commissioners to participate in the evaluation and recommendation of contracts before they go to the full commission for approval. She also asked local, state and federal authorities to investigate potential illegal acts Quick quiz she found while conducting the audit. Chick declined to elaborate on what the acts were or who was involved. The mayor said at the time of the audit's release that he did not think his airport commissioners had done anything wrong, saying that "proper procedures have been followed." On Monday, he said steps must be taken to protect the integrity of Los Angeles' system of citizen oversight of city departments. Hahn told the city's more than 300 commissioners that they will continue to play an important role in approving contracts, but they must wait for contract recommendations to reach the full commission. Chick praised Hahn's action Monday as "a first step in making real and significant change." A statement http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-hahn6jan06,1,4065693,print.story?coll=la-headli... 1/6/2004 Los Angeles Times: Hahn Bans Panelists From Contractor Talks Page 2 of 2 , by her office said the audit showed that when airport commissioners got involved in the early evaluation of bidders, "clear and transparent documentation was consistently absent." Council members Cindy Miscikowski and Wendy Greuel also praised the mayor for acting quickly,but emphasized that they would like the council to go further. "He has issued an executive directive, which is a policy order. We need to make it a law," Miscikowski said. Councilman Bernard C. Parks praised the mayor's order,but said it was "unfortunate that it had to come well after" several council members, including himself and Chick, had called for reforms. Chick said she investigated the contracting practices after hearing rumors of a "pay-to-play" environment in which contractors make contributions to political campaigns in exchange for favorable treatment. In response, Miscikowski and Greuel co-authored the motion, to be considered today, seeking to reform the contracting process. Their motion also proposes to ban city commissioners from engaging in political fundraising. The council has rejected previous efforts to ban fundraising by commissioners, which is a common practice at City Hall. Miscikowski acknowledged Monday that she and her husband, Community Redevelopment Agency Commissioner Doug Ring, hosted a fundraiser for Hahn in June. An executive with a firm that does business with the agency also helped organize the event. The councilwoman said Monday that her husband's fundraising activity was legal at the time and that she does not see anything contradictory about her move to ban the practice. "It's time for a change," she said. "There has been a practice and policy in the past, but it's time to review the whole issue to see if it makes sense." Ring said he supports his wife's proposal. "It is clear to me that [fundraising] creates at least the appearance of impropriety," he said. Ring said Monday that he probably should not have co-hosted an event with the head of Forest City Development. Although several Forest City officials made donations to Hahn, the commissioner said political contributions do not play a role in his decision-making. "Had I thought about it before, I would not have done it," Ring said. If ou want other stories on this topic,search the Archives at latimes.com/archIves. Click here for article licensing and reprint options Copyright 2004 Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.conVnews/local/la-me-hahn6jan06,1,4065693,print.story?coll=la-headli... 1/6/2004 D 6&b Ls'm Orange County PROF1 F-.,.. Se. NATIVES AND NEWCOMERS: I Figure , Population Composition of AN OVERVIEW OF ORANGE Orange County, California and the United States, 2000 COUNTY'S POPULATION Orange County INTRODUCTION 1 s.5% This edition of Profiles is the Laguna Woods in 1999. Rancho first in a series investigating Orange Santa Margarita became a city in County's population characteristics in 2000 and its incorporated-boundaries 11.3% 46.5% detail. This issue utilizes information include the 1990 Rancho Santa from the U.S. Census Summary File Margarita CDP and the 1990 Trabuco 0.9% 3. Summary File 3 is sample data Highlands CDP. Lake Forest also from the Census long form incorporated before the 2000 Census, 22.8°i° questionnaire, which samples about raising the total number of one in every six households. We will incorporated cities to 33. California focus on three populations: those Census 2000 identified nine 15.9% born in California and still residing in CDPs: Aliso Viejo, Coto de Caza, California (referred to as California Portola Hills, Rossmoor, and Tustin : i natives), those born in another state Foothills (all 1990 CDPs), with the 10.30/6 but now living in California (non- four new CDPs of Foothill Ranch, 50.2°0 California U.S. natives) and those Las Flores, Newport Coast, and Sati 1.1°i° that are foreign-born and now living Joaquin Hills. With the closing of , in California (immigrants). We will the Marine Corps Air Station at El 22.5 look at the migration patterns of the Toro, the U.S. Census Bureau did not residents of Orange County over identify El Toro or El Toro Station as United States time, and then hopefully in later CDPs in 2000, as they did in 1990. 6.6% editions we will investigate patterns Due to the unique nature of these two 4.5% of migration and homeownership CDPs, they will be left out of the 1.3% _ status by different racial and ethnic analysis in much of this report. Since groups. the 2000 Census, Aliso Viejo CDP has incorporated into a city and Lake GEOGRAPHIC CHANGES Forest has annexed the CDPs of 27.7% Orange County had 29 Foothill Ranch and Portola Hills and 60.0% incorporated cities and ten Census the City of Newport Beach annexed Designated Places (CDPs) during the Newport Coast CDP and San Joaquin _ 1990 Census. A portion of the 1990 Hills CDP. It is noted that the rl Born in state of residence Laguna Hills CDP became the City incorporated boundaries of the City ®Born in other U.S. state of Laguna Hills in 1991 and much of of Aliso Viejo vary from the a Citizen, Born outside U.S. a Foreign born: Naturalized citizen the former CDP's remaining area identified boundaries of the Aliso U Foreign born: Not a citizen became the incorporated City of Viejo CDP. Source:U.S.Census Summary File 3 2000. PAGE t Profiles 2003 Figure 2 POPULATION CHANGE Population Composition by Orange County Jurisdiction, The 1990 Census showed California and the United States, 2000 58.1% of Orange County residents were born outside the state they United states were currently living in California Orange County (California). This is higher than Aliso Viejo CDP �^ both the State of California and Anaheim the United States. In 1990, 53.6% Brea _ of California residents were born Buena Park in a state other than California; Costa Mesa -' 38.2% of the U.S. population were Coto de Caza CDP born in a state other than the state Cypress in which they were currently Dana Point living. In Orange County, 41.1% Foothill Ranch CDP of those born outside California Fountain valley were foreign-born (born outside Fullerton the U.S. to a non-U.S. citizen) and Garden Grove 57.0% were born in another U.S. Huntington Beach state. Only 1.9% of Orange Irvine County's population born outside La Habra La Palma 7 California were born abroad to Laguna Beach U.S. citizens. (A native U.S. Laguna Hills citizen is a person born on U.S. Laguna Niguel soil or born to a U.S. citizen Laguna Woods anywhere in the world.) By 2000, Lake Forest 53.5% of Orange County's Las Flores CDP population were born outside of Los Alamitos California, a decline of 4.6 Mission Viejo percentage points (Figure 1). Of Newport Beach these, 55.8% were foreign-born Newport Coast CDP and 42.6% were born in another Orange state. The percent of the county Placentia --- --- population born outside of Portola Hills CDP California who were born abroad Rancho Santa Margarita to U.S. citizens dropped to 1.6%. Rossmoor CDP San Clemente San Joaquin Hills CDP ❑Bornin State of Residence San Juan Capistrano Santa Ana ---- -- - - E Bom in U.S.State Other than Seal Beach _ �• State Currently Residing Stanton Tustin O Citizen,Born outside U.S. Tustin Foothills CDP Villa Park -" ❑Foreign Born:Naturalized Westminster '! Citizen Yorba Linda N Foreign Born: Not a Citizen Remainder Unincorporated — 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source and Note: For more detailed data on Figure 2, please see 2000 U.S.Census Percent of Total Population Summary File 3,Table P21. i PAGE 2 Profiles 2003 Between 1990 and 2000, the percent of population in the immigrant population. Orange County was home to 9.6% nation that was native born (born in the United States or of California's immigrant population and 2.7% of the born abroad to U.S. citizens) decreased from 92.1% to nation's immigrant population. 88.9%. In California, the native born population was 73.8% in 2000, down from 78.3% in 1990. In 2000, one SUNNY CALIFORNIA in four Californians and one out of every nine U.S. About one in two Orange County residents residents was foreign-born. Figure 2 shows the population (46.5%) was born in California. The 2000 Census reported composition for Orange County jurisdictions. about one in four (23.7%) was born in another state or Table 1 shows the five largest positive and abroad and three of every ten (29.9%) were foreign-born. negative percent changes in population by Orange County The draw of California: its diverse choices of geography, jurisdiction between 1990 and 2000 for the percent of weather, real estate,and the economy (in the past), to name population that is a U.S. native. The top four places were a few, have drawn new residents and retained old ones. relatively new communities and had rapid housing growth Aliso Viejo CDP again tops this list, having its native between 1990 and 2000. The standout is Laguna Hills, Californian population grow by over 500% between 1990 which was a CDP in 1990 and incorporated in 1991. The and 2000. Aside from the same top four places discussed incorporated boundaries of the city were different from the in Table 1, the next largest increases in native California CDP boundaries, resulting in a lower number of housing residents are shown in Laguna Niguel (66.7%), Tustin units, dropping from 24,000 to 11,300, and showing a (56.4%), Mission Viejo (53.1%), San Juan Capistrano similar loss of associated population. (44.2%), San Clemente (42.6%), and Rossmoor CDP The same top five places discussed in Table 1 also (34.7%) rounding out the top ten(Table 2). showed the largest increases in the percent foreign born, In 1990, the five places with the largest percent of except for Laguna Niguel. Instead, Tustin was the fifth U.S. native residents were: El Toro Station CDP (94.7% ranked place for growth in foreign-born population. most likely due to the then-active Marine Corps Air Rossmoor CDP had the largest decrease in the percent of Station, Coto de Caza CDP (93.2%), Newport Beach foreign-born population dropping 15.5% between 1990 (90.0%), Rossmoor CDP (90.7%), and Seal Beach and 2000. (90.2%). The lowest percent was 49.1% in Santa Ana;just The total number of immigrants in Orange County under half of the resident population was U.S. natives. was 849,899 in 2000. This was an increase of almost 48% Santa Ana is followed by Stanton (69.1%), Garden Grove from the 575,108 immigrants in Orange County in 1990. (69.5%), Westminster (70.9%), and Anaheim (71.6%), all The State also showed an increase, having 6,458,825 having the lowest proportion of U.S. natives. immigrants in 1990 and 8,864,255 in 2000, rising 37.2%. In 2000, Coto de Caza CDP (92.3%), Newport In 2000, California was home to 28.5% of the U.S.' total Beach (89.3%), and Rossmoor CDP (92.4%) were still Table 1 Five Largest Positive and Negative Changes in U.S. Native Population,Orange County, 1990-2000 Population Housina Units Percent Change 1990-2000 1990 2000 1990 1 2000 Native Bom Housing Units Aliso Viejo CDP 7,612 40,225 3,884 16,608 413.3% 327.6% Coto de Caza CDP 2,853 13,057 1,088 4,152 353.5% 281.6% Rancho Santa Margarita 11,390 47,718 4,951 16,515 324.5% 233.6% Portola Hills CDP 2,677 6,391 970 2,181 136.8% 124.8% Laguna Niguel 44,400 61,963 18,892 23,885 33.4% 26.4% Villa Park 6,299 6,090 1,966 2,008 -6.5% 2.1% Fountain Valley 53,691 54,995 18,019 18,473 -7.9% 2.5% Westminster 78,118 87,884 25,852 26,940 -9.0% 4.2% La Palma 15,392 15,131 4,935 5,066 -13.5% 2.7% Laguna Hills' 1 46,731 31,277 24,0571 11,303 -38.5% -53.0% 'Was a CDP in 1990;incorporated in 1991. Source:1990 Census Summary File 1;2000 Census Summary File 3. PAGE 3 Profiles 2003 Table 2 among the places with the highest percents of U.S. natives in Top Ten Largest Increases in the Native their populations. Laguna Beach and Seal Beach rounded out Californian Population by Jurisdiction the top five with 88.7% and 88.4%, respectively. Orange County, 1990-2000 DESTINATION: ORANGE COUNTY Percent Change 5 There are noticeable differences in migration F3ank,Cstxs"Paace 1990'2000 destinations over time. At the time of the 2000 Census, 1 Aliso Viejo CDP 511.9% Laguna Woods had the largest percent of its population arrive 2 Cpto dB Caza CDP 411:9% from a different state. Seventy percent of the residents in 3 Rancho Santa Margarita 360.9% Laguna Woods were born in another U.S. state. Seal Beach 4 Portola HII1s CDP` 136.1% and Laguna Beach followed with 45.5% and 40.3%. El Toro 5 Laguna Niguel 56.7% Station CDP (69.0%), Laguna Hills CDP (54.4%), and Seal 7 Mission Viejo 53 1% 53.1 Beach (52.1%) were the top three places a decade earlier. ' In 1990, Santa Ana had double the number of 8 ` Saw'. ..Capistrano 4-126/0 9 San Clemente 42.6% Anaheim's resident immigrants, which was next in line with 75,734 (Table 3). These were followed by Garden Grove, Huntington Beach and Fullerton. In 2000, the top three cities Source:U.S.Census Summary File 3,lsso and 2000. remained the same, but Irvine and Westminster replaced the fourth and fifth ranking Orange County Table 3 cities. Top Five Destination Cities in Orange County In 1990, the top five destination For Immigrants, 1990 and 2000 cities for new, or recently arrived, immigrants to Orange County were Santa .SeRillw`M h 4^""C:.r. i4.y +.' _ '..'vN. �1rt Iu Y .., "4�•M1'. 555444:::iii x Ana, Anaheim, Garden Grove, Fullerton and Orange (Table 4). These received the -NON. ° ..,. largest numbers of immigrants within the Santa Ana 149,445 Santa Ana 179,933 five years prior to the 1990 Census (1985 Aittani17i1�, 7 „'t73;4ItiteitlFZ , : : ,976 _ April 1990). One in every three n G 608 G Garden Grove 43, arderove 71,351 .. 1..., immigrants to arrive between 1985 and ri 1990 lived in Santa Ana. By 2000, this .10 Fullerton 26,981 Westminster 37,477 dropped to about one in every four new %- I,—' immigrants. In 2000, three of the top five 75,' Ma m ti1�S r G destination cities were the same, but Source:U.S.Census Summary File 3,1990 and 2000. Irvine and Costa Mesa replaced the final two. Table 4 Top Five Destination Cities in Orange County For New Immigrants VARIETY Entering the U.S. Within the Five Years Prior to the Census The immigrant population in 1990 and 2000 Orange County accounts for varying Enteiri• x ' 06tweirll 9W.1090 Enterin :Between 1995-2000 amounts of each jurisdiction's population, ranging from a low in 1990 in Coto de Number Number Caza CDP (6.8%) to a high of 50.9% in Santa Ana 58,540 Santa Ana 38,125 Santa Ana. In 2000, this changed to Anaheim' 27,806 Anaheim 25,422 Rossmoor CDP with 7.6% and Santa Ana Garden Grove 15,341 Garden Grove 12,340 rose slightly with 53.5% of its population Fullerton— 8,525 Irvine 11,013 being foreign-born. Garden Grove Orange 8,101 Costa Mesa 8,379 Total Orange, Total Orange (43.1%), Westminster (42.6%), Stanton county Immigrants 189,284 County Immigrants 165,334 (41.3%) and Anaheim (37.9%), rounded Source:U.S.Census Summary File 3,1990 and 2000. out the top five cities with the largest foreign-born populations in 2000. PAGE 4 Profiles 2003 There is a large variation throughout Orange County in the tenure of The map on page 6 shows the immigrants. One in five (19.5%) Orange County resident immigrants arrived largest entry group within each between 1995 and 2000. Three-quarters of County immigrants arrived in the jurisdiction's immigrant population. past two decades. Only one in ten of current resident immigrants arrived before For example, no jurisdiction has a 1970. One in ten of Santa Ana's total city population is an immigrant that large group of immigrants that arrived within the five years prior to the 2000 Census. entered the U.S. between 1970 and Some places are destinations for more recent immigrants, as discussed 1979. Ten places had a majority of previously, and others show larger percents of their immigrant population their immigrant population entering having been in the country for decades. Within the immigrant population of before 1970. The majority of the each jurisdiction, the places with the largest percents of their immigrant places (24) in the county, including population that arrived recently, between 1995 and 2000, were Los Alamitos, the unincorporated portion of the Costa Mesa, Stanton, Irvine, and Fullerton (Table 5). In 1990, the top five county, had the largest number of cities in Orange County were Dana Point, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Ana, immigrants entering in the past Tustin, and Anaheim. decade (1990-2000). In 1990,the places with the largest percent of immigrants who had been in the U.S.long-term(entered the U.S.prior to 1965)were, in order,Seal Beach, CONCLUSION Laguna Hills CDP, Rossmoor CDP, Laguna Beach, and Newport Beach (Table Several years ago there was a 6). Comparatively, in 2000, these were Laguna Woods, Seal Beach, Rossmoor piece of trivia that said 50% of CDP, Coto de Caza CDP and Laguna Beach. Laguna Woods is the noticeable Americans live within 50 miles of the standout with 71.7% of its total immigrants having entered the country before place they were born; this is known 1965. This is 1.5 times greater than the next city on the list, Seal Beach, with as propinquity. This factoid is still only 46.9%. circulated on the internet today, though there is no source identified. Table 5 With the growing numbers of Top Five Places with the Largest Percent of Total Immigrant Population immigrants and those that naturalize, Entering Within the Five Years Prior to the Census this, albeit questionable, "fact" may Orange County, 1990 and 2000 not hold true in the future, or this a :3s .� Kb"# � r statement may have to be qualified to Pec SA , native-born U.S. citizens. Nr We've seen that Orange B. < County has been a destination for Dana Point 42.8% Los Alamitos 26.7% people from all over the United States a11 �1piSttO 39,3°Ia Costa Mesa KSz4°k. and throughout the world. This issue Santa Ana 39.2% Stanton 24.9% has touched upon many of the spatial Tiustm38.6% 'Irvine patterns of domestic and international Anaheim 36.7% 1 Fullerton 21.2% migration over time throughout the Source:U.S.Census Summary File 3,1990 and 2000. county. With Orange County being home to about one in ten of Table 6 California's large immigrant Top Five: Percent of Immigrant Population in Jurisdiction Who population and 3 of every 100 Entered the U.S. Prior to 1965 immigrants in the nation, Orange 1990 2000 County is likely to continue being a Census Place `: Percent Census Place Percent destination for new immigrants. In ° addition, with almost 25% of its Seal Beach 58.2% Laguna Woods 71.7/° population from another U.S. state, Laguna Hills CDP 47.6% Seal Beach 46.9% Orange Count will also continue to Rossmoor CDP 39.4% Rossmoor CDP 42.4% b y Laguna Beach 38.5% Coto de Caza CDP 31.0% be a draw for natives as well. Newport Beach 35.9% Laguna Beach 28.8% Source:U.S.Census Summary File 3,1990 and 2000. PAGES Profiles 2003 Largest Entry Group of the Immigrant Population by 2000 Census Place La Habra , Brea N Fullerton Placenti La Palma Buena a Park 0 5 10 Villa Park n Miles wa Los Alamitos Anaheim '• Rossmoora t Orange � I Garden Grove Westminste Tu0n Seal Beach chills Santa Ana Unincorporated Tustin Huntington Foothill Ranch Beach Portola Hills Costa Mesa Irvine Lake Fore Rancho Santa San Joaquin Hills Margarita Newport Beach -W o Newport de Coast Caz Year of Entry Las qu 1990 to 2000 Bea Flores Laguna ® 1980 to 1989 Niguel San Juan 1970 to 1979 Capistrano O Prior to 1970 Dana Point San Clemente Source: U.S. Census Summary File 3, 2000. Note: No place shows the largest immigrant entry group as 1970-1979. PROFILES IS PRODUCED BY THE CENTER FOR DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH, CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON. PROFILES IS A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION THAT FOCUSES ON DEMOGRAPHIC ISSUES IN ORANGE COUNTY. THIS ISSUE WAS AUTHORED BY DEBORAH STICKLEY DIEP. WE WELCOME COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS AND CAN BE REACHED AT(714)278-3009. HTTP://WWW.FULLERTON.EDU/CDR Center for Demographic Research - PAGE G AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING January 28, 2004 — 7:00 P.M. Agenda Posting: In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. Items Not Posted: In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or because there is a need to take immediate action, which need came to the attention of the Board subsequent to the posting of agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. Accommodations for the Disabled: The Board of Directors Meeting Room is wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations, please contact the Orange County Sanitation District Board Secretary's office at (714) 593-7130 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. Items Continued: Items may be continued from this meeting without further notice to a Committee or Board meeting held within five (5) days of this meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(3). Meeting Adjournment: This meeting may be adjourned to a later time and items of business from this agenda may be considered at the later meeting by Order of Adjournment and Notice in accordance with Government Code Section 54955 (posted within 24 hours). 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance (Director Joy Neugebauer) 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem. if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 01/28/04 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the regular meeting held on December 17, 2003 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 12/15/03 12/31/03 Totals $7,785,279.15 $14,617,931.91 DIRECTORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving OCSD. This requires that you identify the contributor by name. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with OCSD. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308. please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance. there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: 01/28/04 Page 3 a. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-01, Appointing a Secretary Pro Tern to the Board of Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 03-01. b. (1) Receive and file petition from Richard Dittberner requesting annexation of 0.55 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), in the vicinity of Via Vista and Cooks Corner, in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-02, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-38 — Dittberner Annexation). C. Approve a reimbursement agreement with the Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department (PFRD) for the relocation of Orange County Sanitation District's sewer facilities in Skyline Drive for an estimated amount not to exceed $231,602, as required by PFRD's Master Plan Storm Drain Program, in a form approved by General Counsel. d. Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with ADS Environmental Services for Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, waiving the requirement for Errors and Omissions insurance with no change to the total contract amount not to exceed $6,337,400. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 11. STEERING COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a. Order draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 17, 2003 to be filed. Non-Consent Calendar b. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the January 28, 2004 meeting. C. Consideration of items deleted from Steering Committee Consent Calendar, if any. 12. URBAN RUNOFF AD HOC COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a. Order draft Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meetings held on May 21, 2003, and January 14, 2004, to be filed. 01/28/04 Page 4 Non-Consent Calendar b. Approve a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Program Management Consultants (IPMC), a joint venture of Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. and CH2M Hill, Inc., to conduct an urban runoff study in an amount not to exceed $223,123. C. Consideration of items deleted from Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee Consent Calendar, if any. 13. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE (JCC) JCC Consent Calendar a. Order Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on November 10, 2003, and December 1, 2003 to be filed. JCC Non-Consent Calendar b. Consideration of items deleted from JCC Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 14. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of December 2003. 15. Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for Purchase Order No. 41835-OS issued to Dynamic Fabrication Inc. for $121,568.94, including tax and freight, and a contingency of $3,341.06 for any unforeseen work that may be required to complete the repair, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000.00, for the Emergency Repair of the Plant 2 Truck Loading Station Auger System. 16. (a) Establish a budget for Realignment of Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-13-1, in the amount of $103,000 for the reimbursement of Orange County Sanitation District's share of construction and staff costs; (b) Approve a reimbursement agreement with the City of Newport Beach for Realignment of Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-13-1 near Jamboree Road and Backbay Drive, in a form approved by General Counsel, for an estimated amount not to exceed $80,000; and, (c) Authorize the General Manager to execute quitclaim deeds, in a form approved by General Counsel, to transfer the existing easement to the Irvine Company and the Orange County Public Facilities Resource Department, which upon project completion will no longer be required. 01/28/04 Page 5 17. (a) Approve plans and specification and Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 for Peak Flow Management, Job No. J-67, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (b) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and, (c) Award a construction contract to Margate Construction, Inc. for Peak Flow Management, Job No. J-67, for an amount not to exceed $1,250,900. 18. (a) Approve Plans and Specifications and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (b) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and, (c) Award a construction contract to Norman A. Olsson Construction, Inc. for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, for an amount not to exceed $2,778,985. 19. (a) Approve plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-54, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (b) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and, (c) Award a construction contract to L.H. Engineering Co. for Rehabilitation of Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-54, for an amount not to exceed $144,806.85. 20. (a) Approve plans and specifications and Addendum No. 1 for Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A", Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41; and City of Tustin Project Nos. 6106 and 6151, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (b) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and, (c) Award a construction contract to ARB, Inc., for Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A" Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; Gisler- Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41; and City of Tustin Project Nos. 6106 and 6151, for an amount not to exceed $18,375,999. 21. (a) Reject the unsolicited proposal submitted by Revenue Enhancement Group, dated November 2003, Identifying Undercharged Commercial Parcels; and, (b) Direct staff to evaluate non-residential parcels to determine if those parcels have been undercharged for annual sewer service user fees and, if so, to collect the proper charges on the property tax bill on a going forward basis. 01/28/04 Page 6 22. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-21, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Fees, Procedures and Policies Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-03: a. Open meeting 1. Receive and file written comments, if any 2. Verbal reports of staff 3. Directors' questions 4. Public comments b. Close meeting C. Discussion by Board of Directors d. Recommended actions: 1. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-21 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance OCSD-21, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Fees, Procedures and Policies Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-03. 23. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-22, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Reaffirming Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Revised Capital Facilities Capacity Charges; Adopting Revised Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-20: a. Open meeting 1. Receive and file written comments, if any 2. Verbal reports of staff 3. Directors' questions 4. Public comments b. Close meeting C. Discussion by Board of Directors d. Recommended actions: 01/28/04 Page 7 1. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-22 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance OCSD-22, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Reaffirming Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Revised Capital Facilities Capacity Charges; Adopting Revised Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-20. 24. Closed Session CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives: or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary b, Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 25. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 26. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 27. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for February 25, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. 28. Adjournments 01/28/04 Page 8 'NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of :Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days ;preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. :General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 banderson(a)ocsd.com :Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 pkyleCcDocsd.com Director/Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 dludwin(o)ocsd.com Director/Finance/Treasurer Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 gstreed(cDocsd.com `•.Director/Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 Itomko(a)ocsd.com Director/Information Technology Patrick Miles (714)593-7280 pmilesCcDocsd.com Director/Operations& Maintenance Bob Ooten (714) 593-7020 rooten(a)ocsd.com :Director/Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714)593-7400 rghirelli ocsd.com :Communications Services Mgr. Carol Beekman (714)593-7120 cbeekman(cDocsd.com :General Counsel Thomas L.Woodruff (714)564-2605 tlw wss law.com H:\dept\agenda\Board Agendas\2004 Board Agendas\012804 draft agenda.doc t Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 17, 2003 ��.�•� s a a►t'�r�o 4 r O --1 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 12/17/03 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 17, 2003, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS Shirley McCracken, Chair X Bob Hernandez X Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Leland Wilson Patricia Bortle X Robert McGowan X Brian Brady Peer A. Swan A Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz X Alberta Christy Mike Garcia X John Collins Larry Crandall X j Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Bill Dalton Bruce Broadwater A Brian Donahue David Shawver X Michael Duvall Keri Lynn Wilson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X Alice B. Jempsa Marilynn M. Poe X Tony Kawashima Doug Davert X Beth Krom HChristina Shea X Patsy Marshall Jim Dow X Roy Moore John Beauman X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan A Tod Ridgeway Don Webb A Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Paul Walker Larry Herman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Carol Beekman; Bob Ghirelli; Jim Herberg; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Mike Moore; Ingrid Hellebrand; Judy Bucher; Rich Castillon; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Charles Nichols; Ken Ovrey; Richard Bardin Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 12/17/03 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. 3. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director La Habra Steve Anderson Steve Simonian Stanton Brian Donahue David Shawver Villa Park Patricia Bortle Robert McGowan Yorba Linda Michael Duvall Keri Lynn Wilson REPORT OF THE CHAIR Vice Chair Anderson reported that Chair McCracken was recovering from surgery earlier that week, and that all went well. It was noted that the Cooperative Projects Committee would meet on January 21 st, and the working committees would be dark in January. The deadline for registering for the third Orange County Leadership Symposium at Lake Arrowhead was Friday, December 191h, and the Directors were encouraged to register for this event. Director Anderson announced that the Finance Department had received an award from the Governmental Finance Officers Association for"Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for 2003/04 Budget. Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer, and Mike White, Controller, were commended for their efforts in securing these awards for the District. Director Brian Brady was congratulated for his appointment as General Manager to the Rancho California Water District, as well as receiving his doctorate degree. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported that$1 million has been earmarked in the House VA- HUD-Independent Agencies budget for the District's secondary treatment expansion. Mr. Anderson met with Senator Diane Feinstein to go over several issues and discussed the earmarked funds. He told her that we would be requesting $50 million over the next decade representing less than a 20% federal share. Senator Feinstein said that she would provide support in the future. Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, recognized Judy Bucher for 20 years of service. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 12/17/03 REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas Woodruff announced that the Court of Appeals has affirmed the trial court's decision regarding Crow Winthrop. The Appellate Court issued a ruling that the District's Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Ordinance is not subject to Proposition 218 and therefore the fees imposed on Crow Winthrop were not invalidly charged. Appellate costs are to be paid by Crow Winthrop. Mr. Woodruff announced that there was a need to add an additional closed session item to the agenda which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) to wit: The District was served with a Summons and Complaint in a Superior Court action and a response is required prior to the next Board meeting. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Find that the matter needs immediate action and that the need for action came to the District's attention following posting of the agenda pursuant to authority of California Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); and (2) add an item to the agenda as Item No. 17(a)(2) as follows: Woodside v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., OCSC Case No. 03-CC-17413. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held November 19, 2003, be deemed approved, as written. Director Bob Hernandez abstained. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 11/15f03 11/30/03 Totals $9,135,154.83 $10,099,919.92 Directors Eckenrode and Walker abstained. Director Cavecche abstained from discussion and voting on Warrant No. 57615. Abstentions were pursuant to California Government Code Section 84308. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Eric Holtz requesting annexation of 1.00 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) on Randall Street in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-29, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29— Holtz Annexation). Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 12/17/03 t b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Tim Worden requesting annexation of 0.36 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Vista Del Lago and Lemon Heights Drive in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-30, authorizing initiation of-proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-37—Worden Annexation). C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to enter into a reimbursement agreement with Charles Rinehart, Jack Selman, Tim Metzger, and the Jensen Family Trust for construction of a new 8" VCP sewer in Foothill Boulevard near La Cuesta Drive in Lemon Heights, in a form approved by General Counsel. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Anderson, Vice Chair of the Steering Committee, re the December 17, 2003 meeting. Vice Chair Anderson reported that the General Manager updated the Committee on legislative activities and the Orange County Leadership Symposium. General Counsel reported on the appellate court's favorable decision regarding the Crow Winthop lawsuit. Staff also provided an update on the renewal of the NPDES ocean discharge permit. Additionally, three items were discussed in closed session. Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order the Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 19, 2003 to be filed. Non-Consent Calendar No items considered. 12. OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (OMTS) Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 3, 2003 to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order 38169-OS issued to M. J. Schiff& Associates, Inc. for Digester Gas Pipeline Corrosion Protection System Inspection and Repair, Specification Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 i 12/17/03 No. S-2003-12513D, authorizing an addition of$50,726.83, increasing the total contract amount to $435,036.83. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 101470-OB issued to Polydyne Inc., for the Purchase of Cationic Polymer, Specification No. C-2003-143,for an additional amount of $229,000, increasing the estimated amount to$1,059,000, for the contract period ending April 30, 2004. d. Item pulled to Non-Consent Calendar. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a change order to Purchase Order No. 22834-OS, issued to Michael Turnipseed & Associates, for a time extension through June 30, 2004,to provide biosolids Environmental Management System related services, including the performance of biosolids land application site inspections in Kings and Kern counties, for an additional amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $115,000. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to utilize Riverside County's competitively bid multi-agency contract and execute an agreement with Softchoice Corporation for licensing Microsoft Enterprise desktop computer software, for a three year period effective December 31, 2003 through December 31, 2006,for a total amount not to exceed $350,000.00. Non-Consent Calendar d. Directors entered into discussion regarding some cities and agencies not participating or responding to staff's request for fair-share cost participation in the Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) program. Directors requested staff to copy them on correspondence to the cities' staff regarding this project and other projects in the future. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Authorize development of a Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) public education and outreach program in accordance with the provisions of California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Order No. R8-2002-0014, General Discharge Requirements for Sewage Collection Agencies; (2) Establish a budget of$150,000 for FOG public education and outreach program which will be divided equally among participating cities/agencies and Orange County Sanitation District; (3) Authorize the General Manager to develop a funding program with the cities/agencies within the District's jurisdiction for development of the FOG public education and outreach program; and (4) Authorize the General Manager to award a Consultant Services Agreement for Comprehensive Public Education and Outreach Program for Sewage f Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 4 12/17/03 Collection Agencies, Specification No. CS-2003-17213D, for an amount not to exceed $150,000. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Sun Engineering Services for Indoor/Outdoor Lighting Study, Specification No. CS-2003-1456D, providing for a plant lighting study for a total amount not to exceed $110,000. 13. PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the regular meeting held on December 4, 2003, to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$20,680, increasing the total contract amount to $71,218,814. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve a budget amendment of $189,396 for Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, for a total budget of$7,767,396; and, (2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $31,556, increasing the total contract amount to $4,231,742. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Final Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, dated November 2003, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates providing for professional services for Supplemental Full Secondary Treatment CEQA Documentation, Job No. J-40-10, for an amount not to exceed $154,992. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation for engineering services for design of Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains, Bitter Point Pump Station to Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-58, for an amount not to exceed $1,018,907. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, providing for construction support services for an additional amount of $539,610, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,951,021. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 i 12/17/03 h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, providing for additional engineering construction support services for an additional amount of$264,900, increasing the total amount not to exceed $2,019,411. i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source purchase order agreement with NRG, Inc. for Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79, providing for the upgrade and reinstallation of nine existing and upgraded turbochargers, for an amount not to exceed $1,570,191 including sales tax and delivery. Non-Consent Calendar PDC Committee Vice Chair Alice Jempsa noted that as part of the PDC Committee's recommendation to select HDR Engineering for design of Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation, Job No. P1-82, it also recommended authorizing the General Manager to approve task orders to HDR Engineering, if needed, up to a maximum of$100,000. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with HDR Engineering for the design of Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation, Job No. P1-82, for a total amount not to exceed $3,125,026. 14. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 10, 2003 to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2003. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the SWAP Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-31, Approving Second Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust; 2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-32, Approving Third Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust; 3) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD No. 03-33, Approving Fourth Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan; and, Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 12/17/03 4) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-34, Terminating the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust. Non-Consent Calendar No items considered. 15. Consideration of Ordinance No. OCSD-21, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Fees, Procedures and Policies Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-03: a. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD-21 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance; and, b. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: Introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-21, and pass to second reading and public hearing on January 28, 2004. 16. Consideration of Ordinance No. OCSD-22, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Reaffirming Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Revised Capital Facilities Capacity Charges; Adopting Revised Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-20: a. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD-22 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance; and, b. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: Introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-22, and pass to second reading and public hearing on January 28, 2004. 17. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.9(c) and 54956.9(a): The Board convened in closed session at 7:50 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(c) and 54956.9(a)to discuss Agenda Item Nos. 17(a) (1) and (2). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committees Closed Meetings. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:15 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. The General Counsel reported that the Board voted and approved providing the legal defense of Director Eckenrode and also approved Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart to defend the interests of the District in the matter of Woodside v. OCSD, et al., OCSC No. 03-CC-17413. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 10 12/17/03 ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Secretary of#16 Board oypirectors of Orange County Sanitati District H:\dept\agenda\Board Minutes\2003 Board Minutes\121703 minutes.doc Claims Paid From 11/01103 to 11/15103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 57222 Air Products&Chemicals $ 26,294.06 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 57223 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 68.895.33 Professional Services J-73-2 57224 AMSA 29,043.50 Source Control Meeting Registration&Membership 57225 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 36,603.38 Sodium Bisulfite 57226 Black&Veatch Corporation 59,143.90 Engineering Services 131-76,P2-85,J-71-3&Door/Bldg. Specifications 57227 Brown&Caldwell 84,523.58 Professional Services 131-37,2-41 &O&M Standard Operating Procedures Manual 57228 CH2M Hill 108,725.27 Professional Services J-40-7 57229 Dell Computer 25,150.00 (1)Mail Server 57230 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 54,000.00 On-Site Training-Advanced Wastewater Treatment Operator Course 1 57231 IPMC c/o Parsons 1,032,831.00 Professional Services-Program Project Management,Materials/Supplies&Temp. Staff 57232 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 40,551.29 Construction-Repair of Natural Gas Line at Plant 2 Maintenance Building 57233 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 133,000.80 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 57234 Lee&Ro,Inc. 31,156.52 Professional Services 5-50,5-51,5-52&P1-93 57235 Little Hoquiam Shipyard 260,000.00 Ocean Monitoring Research Vessel 57236 Malcolm Pirnie,Inc. 109,987.34 Professional Services J-79&1-10 57237 Orange County Water District 91,065.37 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 57238 Oved Dagan Construction Co. 61,497.90 Construction J-90 57239 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 26,506.58 Electrical Supplies 57240 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 222,681.71 Sodium Hypochlorite 57241 Southern California Edison 39,034.70 Power 57242 Trojan Technologies,Inc. 27,799.50 Professional Services J-40-6 57243 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 225,793.14 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 57244 U.S.Metro Group,Inc. 63,749.00 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 57245 U.S. Peroxide 39,092.90 Prof.Serv.-Coll. Sys.Odor&Corrosion Study and Hydro.Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 57246 Union Bank of California 44,568.40 Construction 1-2-4, Retention 57247 The Wackenhut Corporation 30,318.95 Security Guards 57248 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 103,591.59 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 57249 ARB,Inc. 607,370.71 Construction 11-22 57250 Cora Constructors 25,605.00 Construction 7-7-2 57251 Steve P Rados,Inc. 401,115.60 Construction 1-2-4 57252 AccuStandard,Inc. 390.65 Lab Supplies 57253 Advance Business Graphics 484.88 Stationery 57254 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 1,817.05 MSD Data Analysis Software&Lab Parts&Supplies 57255 Airborne Express 167.97 Air Freight 57256 Airgas Safety,Inc. 424.34 Safety Supplies 57257 American Fildelity Assurance Company 66.00 Employee Cancer Insurance Premiums 57258 American Society of Civil Engineers 640.00 Membership 57259 American Training Resources,Inc. 637.31 Safety Video 57260 Ametek Process&Analytical Instruments 1,705.49 Instrument Parts&Supplies 57261 Amot Control Corporation 849.72 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57262 Aquarium Doctor 97.90 Aquarium Maintenance at Human Resources Building 57263 Arch Wireless 1,596.65 Airtime,Service&Equipment 57264 Arizona Instrument 689.00 Instrument Repairs&Calibration Services 57265 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 95.44 Telephone Service 57266 AT&T Wireless Services 4,489.09 Cellular Air Time 57267 AT&T Wireless-TITAN 9.14 Cellular Phones&Accessories 57268 AT&T Wireless Services 3.014.80 Wireless Phone Services J-73-2 fin/210nc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dtaUin\2201APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-031Claims Paid Report-111503.x1s Page 1 of 8 1213/2003 Claims Paid From 11101103 to 11/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57269 Baker Tanks 7,129.69 Tank Rentals 57270 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 20,059.85 Telephone Equipment Service&Semi-Annual Contract 57271 Battery Specialties 743.90 Batteries 57272 Borthwick,Guy,Bettenhausen 2,401.81 Professional Services 132-84 57273 Brithinee Electric 650.34 Instrument Parts&Supplies 57274 Peter H.Brown 225.66 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57275 Bush&Associates,Inc. 17,196.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 57276 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 1,646.15 Lab Parts&Supplies 57277 C.S.U.F. Foundation 10,818.25 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 57278 Cal-Glass,Inc. 27.48 Glass Repair 57279 California Brea Partners 17,629.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57280 Cambridge Isotope Labs 658.12 Lab Parts&Supplies 57281 Cameron Environmental,Inc. 18,834.70 Professional Services-Odor Scrubbing System 57282 Cameron Welding Supply 364.48 Welding Supplies 57283 Carollo Engineers 727.50 Professional Services-Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study 57284 Center For Urban Infrasructure Comm Dsgn. 215.00 General Management Meeting Registration 57285 Champion America 552.09 Smokers Cease Fire Receptacles 57286 Charles P.Crowley Co. 591.28 Pump Parts&Supplies 57287 Charts,Inc. 550.15 Instrument Supplies 57288 Clickguard Corporation 531.68 Printer Service Agreement 57289 Coast Fire Equipment 701.78 Fire Extinguishers 57290 Columbia Analytical Services,Inc. 850.00 Analysis of Wastewater, Industrial Wastewater&Biosolids 57291 CompuMaster 2,800.00 On-Site Word Training 57292 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 6,289.93 Electrical Supplies 57293 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 864.90 Plumbing Supplies 57294 Corporate Express 6,631.10 Office Supplies 57295 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 155.00 Custodial Services 57296 Cortech Engineering 5,330.72 Pump Parts&Supplies 57297 Cost Containment Solutions 774.84 Worker's Comp.Services 57298 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 568.21 Maint.Agreement-Repair/installation of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios 57299 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,079.64 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57300 CASA 75.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 57301 CGvL Engineers 1,445.25 Engineering Services SP-74 57302 CWEA Membership 97.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 57303 CWEA-SARBS,Inc. 100.00 Operations Meeting Registration 57304 David's Tree Service 245.00 Tree Maint.Service 57305 Del Mar Analytical 1,928.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 57306 Denise De Benedetto 4,758.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57307 Developers Insurance Company 317.94 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57308 Diamond H Recognition 191.52 Employee Service Awards 57309 Diehl,Evans&Co., L.L.P. 700.00 Accounting Training Registration 57310 Dionex Corporation 496.51 Lab Parts&Supplies 57311 Direct Safety Co. 580.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57312 Doug Horwood Supply 313.19 Repair&Maintenance Service on Mailroom Stamping Equipment 57313 Douglass Truck Bodies,Inc. 21,872.88 Fabrication&Installation of(1)Custom Service Truck Body,Bedliner,Bumper&Lights 57314 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 189.76 Paint Supplies 57315 Dynalco Corp 375.25 Instrument Maint.Service 57316 E.Sam.!ones Distributors,Inc. 1,053.79 Electrical Supplies fin1210rtc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta1fn12201APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-031Claims Paid Report-111503As Page 2 of 8 12r=63 Claims Paid From 11/01/03 to 11/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57317 Eagle Picher Industries,L.L.C. 253.72 Lab Parts&Supplies 57318 Electra-Bond,Inc. 775.80 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Belt Press Rollers 57319 Emergency Management Network,Inc. 550.00 Safety Video 57320 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 153.75 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 57321 Enchanter,Inc. 2,700.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 57322 EDT Aktiengesellschaft 8,443.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57323 ENS Resources,Inc. 15,000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 57324 F H Pumps, Inc. 420.18 Pump&Motor 57325 FedEx Corporation 236.76 Air Freight 57326 First American Real Estate Solutions 647.50 Orange County Property Information 57327 Fisher Scientific 5,411.17 Lab Parts&Supplies 57328 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 670.00 Concrete Cutting 57329 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 257.95 Meeting Supplies 57330 Fountain Valley Camera 13.54 Photo Supplies 57331 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 376.80 Paint Supplies 57332 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 703.29 Truck Wash Tickets 57333 Franklin Covey 344.11 Office Supplies 57334 Fry's Electronics 80.80 Computer Supplies 57335 Infrared Training Center 3,090.00 Instrumentation&Electrical Maint.Training Registration 57336 Garratt-Callahan Company 7,198.73 Chemicals 57337 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. 11,071.83 Belt Press Filter Parts&Supplies 57338 Golden State Controls 1,053.30 Tank Rehabilitation-Bacteria Reduction Program 57339 Grainger,Inc. 3.607.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57340 Graphic Controls 111.10 Office Supplies 57341 Graybar Electric Company 42.62 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57342 Guarantee Records Management 723.49 Off-Site Storage Services 57343 Haaker Equipment Company 1,934.45 Misc.Vehicle Parts,Repairs&Service 57344 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 427.90 Chemical Kits 57345 Harold Primrose Ice 129.50 Ice For Samples 57346 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 54.11 Plumbing Supplies 57347 Hill Brothers 16,489.14 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 57348 Home Depot 285.60 Misc. Repair&Maintenance Material 57349 Hopkins Technical Products 192.61 Pump Supplies 57350 Hub Auto Supply 54.77 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 57351 Industrial Distribution Group 2,608.86 Mechanical&Painting Supplies 57352 Industrial Metal Supply 538.02 Metal 57353 IBM 6,202.56 Maintenance Agreement AS-400 57354 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 246.56 Batteries for Vehicles&Carts 57355 InterNational Electrical Testing Assoc. 79.00 Publication 57356 Iron Mountain 85.00 Bid Document Storage Fees P1-37&J-39 57357 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 272.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 57358 Irvine Pipe&Supply 339.31 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57359 Irvine Ranch Water District 8.05 Water Use 57360 Irvine Technology Corporation 3,360.00 Temporary Employment Services 57361 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 1.634.00 Specialty Gases 57362 Joe Rhodes Maintenance Services,Inc. 147.11 Maint.Agreement-OCSD Fuel Management System 57363 Johnstone Supply 2,103.48 Electrical Equipment&Supplies 57364 Kforce,Inc. 12,759.12 Temporary Employment Services fin/21OAc EXHIBIT A GAexcel.dtalfin12MAPSHAREVaims Paid Report102-01CIaims Paid Report-111503.)ds Page 3 of 8 12/312003 Claims Paid From 11/01/03 to 11/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57365 Local Agency Formation Commission 2,300.00 Annexation Fees 57366 Long Beach Line-X 646.50 Repair&Maintenance Services-Utility Trailer 903 57367 Lucci's Gourmet Foods,Inc. 79.37 Meeting Expense 57368 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 80.00 Professional Services-Pacific Coast Highway Force Mains 57369 David R.Mahuvakar 300.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57370 McCrometer, Inc. 715.30 Instrument Parts&Supplies 57371 McMahan Business Interiors 3,440.12 Office Furniture&Fixtures 57372 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 478.42 Mechanical,Electrical&Lab Parts,Supplies&Tools 57373 Mc Welco Products 1,657.19 (2)Tool Boxes 57374 Media Resurfacing Systems,Inc. 3,000.00 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance 57375 Medlin Controls Co. 1.226.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57376 Mid-West Associates 714.25 Pump Supplies 57377 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 5,687.50 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance 57378 Mission Uniform Service 4,807.61 Uniform Rentals 57379 Motion Industries, Inc. 206.86 Pump Supplies 57380 MotorTech USA, Inc. 1,350.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57381 MAG-TROL,Inc. 321.66 Electrical Supplies 57382 National Filter Media Corporation 3,208.93 Meters 57383 National Safety Council 1,175.93 On-Site Safety Training-Defensive Driving 57384 Neal Supply Co. 800.48 Plumbing Supplies 57385 Nextel Communications 4,273.32 Wireless Services 57386 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 3,093.38 Professional Services-Materials Testing, Inspection&Geotechnical Engrg. 67387 NACE International 390.00 Membership 57388 NAFA, Inc. 415.00 Membership 57389 NAS Associates,Inc. 1,680.00 Lab Services 57390 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,324.31 Office Supplies 57391 Ondeo Degremont, Inc. 5,224.34 Motor 57392 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 3,267.95 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57393 The Orange County Register 267.48 Notices&Ads 57394 Orange County Vector Control District 579.30 Pest Control 57395 Orange Courier 189.00 Courier Services 57396 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 235.00 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 57397 Osterbauer Compressor 7,300.26 Compressor Parts&Supplies 57398 Oxygen Service Company 2,551.29 Specialty Gases 57399 OCB Reprographics 15,683.97 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 57400 Pacific Bell Internet Services 328.86 Internet Service 57401 Pacific Mechanical Supply 382.25 Plumbing Supplies 57402 Pacific Process Equipment,Inc. 691.38 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57403 Parker Hannifin Corporation 404.94 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57404 Parker Supply Company 2.521.79 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57405 Parkhouse Tire Co.,Inc. 712.96 Tires 57406 Patriot Video Productions 51.72 Video 57407 Permaseal 362.04 Lube Oil 57408 Portion Industries,Inc. 1,298.49 Lab Parts&Supplies 57409 Power Design 4,896.86 Electrical Supplies 57410 Praxair Distribution, Inc. 14.65 Demurrage 57411 Primary Source Office Furnishings,Inc. 16,319.89 Office Furniture 57412 Process Equipment Company 2,901.66 Pump&Pump Supplies fin/21 OAc EXHIBIT,/ GAexcel.ft in12201APSHARE1Claims Paid Report102.031Clalms Paid Report-111503.rds Page 4 of 8 1213/2003 Claims Paid From 11/01/03 to 11/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57413 Profit Techniques,Inc. 1,000.00 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 57414 Pump Engineering 2,902.39 Pump&Mechanical Seal 57415 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 8,512.26 Hydraulic Pumps 57416 PCG Industries 500.00 Repair&Maintenance Service 57417 PCS Express,Inc. 114.62 Courier Service 57418 Ramco Specialty Products 146.58 Oil&Grease 57419 Ricoh Business System 831.07 Color Copier Lease 57420 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 179.00 Human Resources Training Registration 57421 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 14.38 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 57422 RPM Electric Motors 1,131.38 Sump Pump 57423 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 11,858.00 Construction-Installation of Cured-In-Place Pipe Liner for 8"Sewer in Tustin 57424 Scicon Technologies Corp. 439.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57425 Scottel Voice&Data, Inc. 2,284.80 Telephone System Maintenance 57426 Voided Check - - 57427 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 252.57 Hardware Supplies 57428 Smardan Supply Company 107.75 Instrument Supplies 57429 Smith Pipe&Supply 1,240.75 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 57430 Smith-Emery Company 3,356.50 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 57431 Snap-On Tools, Inc. 411.46 Tools 57432 Soft-train,Inc. 315.01 Human Resources Training Registration 57433 South Coast Systems,Inc. 1,858.00 Professional Services-Installation of 200 Watt Power Supply for AGF Pilot Test Facility 57434 Southern California Water 67.97 Water Use 57435 Southern Mgr Grp,Inc.c/o O'Connor Sale 3,750.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57436 Sparling Instruments, Inc. 1,896.40 Instrument Supplies 57437 Summit Steel 1,046.65 Metal 57438 Sunset Ford 26.94 Auto Parts&Service 57439 Sunset Industrial Parts 625.29 Mechanical Supplies 57440 Seegott,Inc. 25.00 Freight 57441 SBC 17.80 Telephone Services 57442 SCP Science 234.00 Lab Supplies 57443 SPEC Services,Inc. 16,650.00 Professional Services P1-89 57444 SPX Valves&Controls 5,830.01 Valves&Mechanical Supplies 57445 Tesco Controls,Inc. 1,508.50 Reactive Air System 57446 The Walking Man,Inc. 1,825.00 Public Outreach Program-Door Hangers for Warner Avenue Lane Closure 57447 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,646.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57448 Thompson Publishing Group 339.00 Publication 57449 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 429.25 Locks&Keys 57450 Trenchless Technology 250.00 Project Management Office Training Registration 57451 Trinity Consultants,Inc. 725.00 Software Maintenance 57452 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 9,771.91 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 57453 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 83.14 Truck&Auto Parts 57454 Truesdail Laboratories,Inc. 824.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 57455 Two Wheels One Planet 1,336.05 Bicycles&Bicycle Parts&Supplies 57456 TEKsystems 19,281.00 Temporary Employment Services 57457 U S Bank 3,960.50 Annual Administration Fee for Series 2000 Certificates of Participation 9/1/03-8/31/04 57458 U-Line 503.17 Miscellaneous Packing/Shipping Materials 57459 Ultra Scientific 815.15 Lab Parts&Supplies 57460 United Parcel Service 940.06 Parcel Services ftn1210nc EXHIBIT A G:%excel.dtalfin12201APSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-031CIaims Paid Report-111503.)ds Page 5 of 8 1202003 Claims Paid From 11/01/03 to 11/15103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57461 United Rentals,Inc. 366.33 Aerial Boom Lift Rental 57462 Univar USA 1,055.95 Chemicals 57463 Van Air Systems,Inc. 473.77 Instrument Parts&Supplies 57464 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 12,322.00 Temporary Employment Service 57465 Varian,Inc. 1,226.76 Lab Parts&Supplies 57466 Varian,Inc. 2,868.70 Lab Parts&Supplies 57467 Verizon California 828.48 Telephone Services 57468 Voided Check - - 57469 Vossier&Company 3,112.06 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57470 VWR Scientific Products 4,224.69 Lab Parts&Supplies 57471 Waste Markets 12,664.71 Maint.Agreement-Grit Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal 57472 Water Systems Cleaning Co. 4,195.00 Professional Services-Scrubber#10 Maintenance 57473 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 8,914.15 Engineering Service J-67 57474 Simon L.Watson 160.01 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57475 Waxie Sanitary Supply 573.58 Janitorial Supplies 57476 West Coast Rotor 3,011.61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57477 Western Wholesale 219.43 Tools&Mechanical Supplies 57478 Westmark Paint Co. 246.60 Painting Supplies 57479 Willamette Industries,Inc. 327.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57480 WEF 1.180.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 57481 WEF Publications 66.70 Publication 57482 Xerox Corporation 6,085.96 Fax&Copier Leases 57483 3E Company 10,591.44 Online 3E Website Service&Maintenance Agreement 57484 Blake Anderson 370.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57485 Jennifer M.Cabral 344.32 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57486 Leandre P.Catacutan 479.48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57487 James R. Hams 253.35 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 57488 Deirdre E. Hunter 150.83 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57489 Tony S. Lee 190.00 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 57490 Douglas M.Stewart 553.58 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57491 Karen A.Tumbaugh 119.55 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57492 Paula A.Zeller 227.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57493 Knott's Berry Farm 5,474.00 Employee Deposit Transfer 57494 Watson,Simon 1,750.44 Employee Computer Loan Program 57495 Orange County Sanitation District 52,114.27 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 57496 Orange County Sanitation District 596,551.09 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 57497 Orange County Water District 2,252,449.04 GWRS Joint Project J-36 57498 Pacific Investment Management Co. 148.977.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 57499 Airgas Safety,Inc. 12.29 Safety Supplies 57500 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 1,963.14 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 57501 Arnold D. Purisch,Ph.D.,Inc. 1,120.00 Professional Employee Counseling Services 57502 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 21.78 Telephone Service 57503 AT&T Wireless-TITAN 33.26 Cell Phones&Accessories 57504 Ce112CeII 170.61 Cell Phones&Accessories 57505 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 57506 Compressor Components Of California 3,354.00 Coil Cleaning&Testing&Compressor Parts 57507 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 229.81 Electrical Supplies 57508 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,797.31 Plumbing Supplies fin/21011c EXHIBIT,A G:lexcei.dtaTin12201APSHARE1Cleims Paid Report102-0310aims Paid Report-111503.x1s Page 6 of 8 12/3/2003 Claims Paid From 11101/03 to 11/15103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57509 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 57510 Dharma Consulting 8,000.00 Facilitator Services for EMT/Manager Workshop 57511 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 970.00 Medical Screening 57512 Electra-Bond, Inc. 7,881.91 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Belt Press Rollers 57513 Element K Journals 99.00 Subscription 57514 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 7,943.20 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 57515 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 57516 Five Star Metals,Inc. 652.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57517 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 57518 Industrial Metal Supply 261.91 Metal 57519 Internal Revenue Service 450.00 Wage Garnishment 57520 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 3,732.78 Dues Deduction 57521 IECOC 22.00 Safety&Health Meeting Registration 57522 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 512.00 Professional Services-Human Resources Policies&Procedures 57523 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 877.83 Lab Parts&Supplies, 57524 Moreland&Associates 4,799.38 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 57525 National Bond&Trust 2,072.37 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 57526 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 470.24 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57527 OCEA 580.11 Dues Deduction 57528 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 57529 Parker Hannifin Corporation 152.12 Instrument Parts&Supplies 57530 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 57531 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,593.00 Dues Deduction 57532 PenValve 117.07 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 57533 IRS Hughes Co,Inc. 136.69 Paint Supplies 57534 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 333.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57535 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 57536 So.Cal.Gas Company 1,127.80 Natural Gas 57537 Tule Ranch Farms 7,763.08 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 57538 The Unisource Corporation 276.38 Office Supplies 57539 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 57540 Verizon California 28.52 Telephone Services 57541 WEF 1,234.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 57542 WEFTEC 1,390.00 Engineering&Construction Meeting Registration 57543 Douglas I.Cook 351.95 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 57544 Robert P. Ghirelli 1,307.42 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57545 Victoria L. Henn 100.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57546 Mark H. Kawamoto 127.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57547 Jin H.Kim 103.94 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57548 Tracey L.Murphy 130.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57549 Robert Ooten 112.08 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57550 John W.Swindler 239.20 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57551 City of Fountain Valley 540.89 Plan Check Fee-J-89 57552 Eilenberger,Traci 750.00 Liability Claim Settlement 57553 Kienow Associates, Inc. 10,271.73 Litigation Services-1-2-4 57554 Orange County Sanitation District 2,877.05 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,841,360.63 finr210Ac EXHIBIT A G\excel.dia\fin\220\APSFIARBClaims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-111503.x1s Page 7 of 8 1202003 Claims Paid From 11101/03 to 11H 5103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 31483-31600 Employee Paychecks $ 169,082.25 Biweekly Payroll 11/12/03 31601 -31603 Employee Paychecks 988.77 Payroll Adjustment&Reissue Stale-Dated Checks 31604-31604 Employee Paycheck 4,237.21 Termination Paycheck 91517-92031 Direct Deposit Statements 884.353.45 Biweekly Payroll 11/12/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,058,661.68 Wire Transfer Payments JP Morgan Chase Bank $ 126,684.93 Societe Generale October Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation JP Morgan Chase Bank 34,681.25 October Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Manhattan Bank 73,766.34 Commitment Fee on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation(8/1-10/31/03) Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 235,132.52 Total Claims Paid 11/01/03-11/15/03 $ 9,135,154.83 fin/210nc EXHIBIT A G:lexcel.dtalfin\220WPSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-030aims Paid Report-111503.)ds Page 8 of 8 12/3/2003 ti Claims Paid From 11/16/03 to 11/30/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 57555 Air Products&Chemicals $ 26,294.06 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 57556 American Express 28,325.95 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 57557 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 50,603.20 Caustic Soda,Sodium Bilsutfite&Sodium Hydroxide 57558 Black&Veatch Corporation 40,422.19 Engineering Services J-77,132-85&SP-73 57559 Blue Cross of California 312,884.78 Medical Insurance Premium 57560 Brown&Caldwell 65,731.85 Professional Services 1-98,2-41 &CMOMNMR 57561 Bush&Associates,Inc. 28.258.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 57562 California Soil Products 104,745.68 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 57563 Carollo Engineers 664,985.20 Professional Services P2-66&SP-90 57564 City of Fountain Valley 25,970.14 Water Use 57565 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 114,437.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 57566 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 27,037.36 Long-Term&Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium 57567 Hill Brothers 41,474.49 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 57568 Industrial Fabrics Corp. 34,570.00 Durotex Belts-Various Sizes 57569 Voided Check - - 57570 IPMC c/o Parsons 820,788.00 Professional Services-Program Project Management,Materials/Supplies&Temp. Staff 57571 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 36,300.00 Construction-Santa Ana River Access Road&Manhole Rehabilitation Project 57572 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 51,920.14 Medical Insurance Premium 57573 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 100,290.59 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 57574 Kforce,Inc. 26,795.63 Temporary Employment Services 57575 MDS Consulting 35,936.16 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 57576 North American Digester Cleaning Svcs. 118,140.00 Maint.&Repair Services-Cleaning of(4)Digesters at Plts. 1 &2 57577 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 211,092.25 Sodium Hypochlorite 57578 Realtime Systems Corporation 49,976.00 Software Maint.Agreement 57579 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 38,034.90 Ocean Monitoring P-185&P-179 57580 Voided Check - - 57581 Systime Computer Corp 25,595.00 Professional Services-JD Edwards OWXe System Support 57582 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 171,490.83 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 57583 U.S.Peroxide 253.150.90 Prof.Serv.-Collection Sys.Odor&Corrosion Study&Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 57584 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 95,183.73 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 57585 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 953,095.43 Construction P2-85,J-35-2&J-87 57586 Margate Construction,Inc. 2,242,268.00 Construction P1-37 57587 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 57,313.69 Construction J-40-6 57588 Southern Contracting Company 28,260.00 Construction J-33-1A 57589 Abrasive Engineering Tool&Equipment 112.08 Hardware 57590 Absolute Standards,Inc. 685.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 57591 Advance Business Graphics 318.95 Printing 57592 Airco Filter Service 125.68 Filters 57593 Airgas-West 6.82 Demurrage 57594 Airgas Safety,Inc. 3,487.49 Safety Supplies 57595 Alfa-Laval, Inc. 2,583.55 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Plant 2 Centrifuge Controls 57596 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 191.97 Packing Materials 57597 American Airlines 6,072.50 Travel Services 57598 American Industrial Hygiene Association 160.00 Membership 57599 American Red Cross 8.00 CPR Training&Miscellaneous Supplies 57600 Amot Control Corporation 866.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57601 Appleone Employment Service 5,613.52 Temporary Employment Services G\wp.dtalfin12101CRAHEWAHRIFAHR20031DEC%Claims Paid Report-113003.)ds EXHIBIT B fin/21011c Page 1 of 8 12/812003 Claims Paid From 11/16/03 to 11/30103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57602 Aqua-Metric Sales 751.60 Fire Hydrant Meter 57603 Arizona Instrument 1,400.75 Instrument Repairs 57604 AT&T Universal Biller 3,375.90 Telephone Service 57605 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 119.79 Telephone Service 57606 AT&T Wireless-TITAN 26.40 Cellular Phones&Accessories 57607 AWSI 236.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 57608 Baker Tanks 1.118.81 Tank Rentals 57609 BioMerieux Vitek,Inc. 1,077.82 Lab Parts&Supplies 57610 Borthwick,Guy,Bettenhausen 467.33 Professional Services P2-84 57611 Brenton Safety,Inc. 277.97 Safety Supplies 57612 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 526.01 Certification of(7)Confined Space Emergency Retrieval Devices 57613 California Relocation Services, Inc. 1,571.25 Moving/Relocation Services 57614 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 6,250.00 Prof. Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 57615 Cardlock Fuels 922.82 Fueling District Vehicles at Local Gas Stations 57616 City of Fountain Valley 890.00 Fire Department Permit-Hazardous Materials 57617 Clemson University 7,990.00 Mechanical Maintenance&Power Production Training Registration 57618 Coastal Training Technologies 532.49 Training Video 57619 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 223.34 Lab Parts&Supplies 57620 Communications Supply Corp. 259.73 Computer Hardware 57621 Con-Way Western Express 1,265.04 Freight 57622 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 1,352.92 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57623 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 621.42 Plumbing Supplies 57624 Corporate Express 10,166.40 Office Supplies 57625 Cost Containment Solutions 3,276.10 Workers Comp.Services 57626 Council on Education in Management 1,196.00 Safety&Health Meeting Registration 57627 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 87.50 Encroachment Permit 57628 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 330.00 Encroachment Permit 57629 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 87.50 Encroachment Permit 57630 County Wholesale Electric Co. 98.55 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57631 Crane Veyor Corp. 14,598.00 Quarterly Crane Inspections,Annual Certifications&Quad Testing 57632 Culligan of Orange County 37.50 Maint.Agreement-Cen Gen Water Softener System 57633 CR&R,Inc. 2,520.00 Container Rentals 57634 CWEA Membership 194.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 57635 Dawson Company 1,090.40 Pump 57636 Del Mar Analytical 36.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 57637 Diamond H Recognition 280.59 Employee Service Awards 57638 Dickson's, Inc. 872.99 Electrical Supplies 57639 Dionex Corporation 278.96 Lab Parts&Supplies 57640 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 605.20 Office Supplies 57641 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 508.17 Paint Supplies 57642 DGA Consultants,Inc. 20,282.75 Professional Services-CCTV Data Evaluation Support 57643 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 5,729.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57644 Ecology Control Industries 3,492.34 Hazardous Waste Disposal 57645 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 2,855.00 Medical Screening 57646 Enchanter, Inc. 6,300.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 57647 Environmental Science Associates 16,574.28 Professional Services J-40-5 57648 Excel Door&Gate Company,Inc. 880.95 Door Maintenance&Repairs 57649 Fed Ex Corporation 131.40 Air Freight G:\wp.dta\fin1210lCRANE\FAHRTAHR20031DEC1Claims Paid Report-113003.)ds EXHIBIT B finv21011c Page 2 of 8 12v812003 Claims Paid From 11116103 to 11/30/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57650 Filarsky&Watt,L.L.P. 2,042.50 Prof.Serv.-SPMT&Other Bargaining Group Labor Negotiations&Other Services 57651 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 10,153.58 Lab Parts&Supplies 57652 Flomax Products,Inc. 640.04 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57653 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 628.07 Paint Supplies 57654 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 579.90 Truck Wash Tickets 57655 Franklin Covey 555.80 Office Supplies 57656 Fry's Electronics 552.05 Computer Supplies 57657 G.T.Hall Company 1,792.43 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57658 General Electric Supply Company 434.24 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57659 General Petroleum 12,949.19 Unleaded Gasoline 57660 Grainger,Inc. 1,213.61 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57661 Graybar Electric Company 3,187.29 Computer Hardware/Software 57662 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 3,292.44 Lab Parts&Supplies 57663 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 5,678.06 Office Furniture 57664 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 864.98 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57665 The Holman Group 903.96 Employee Assistance Program 57666 Home Depot 1,217.44 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Materials 57667 Hopkins Technical Products 4,415.64 Pump Parts&Supplies 57668 Horizon Technology 900.36 Lab Parts&Supplies 57669 Hub Auto Supply 393.60 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 57670 Hydrotex 4,745.31 Lube Oil 57671 Idexx 5,430.60 Lab Parts&Supplies 57672 Industrial Distribution Group 607.83 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57673 Industrial Metal Supply 565.60 Metal 57674 Information Resources 750.00 Human Resources Services-Background Checks 57675 Insight Investments 23,932.27 Software 57676 Intergraph Corporation 5,909.01 Software Maint.Agreement 57677 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 163.90 Batteries for Vehicles&Carts 57678 Invensys Systems,Inc. 677.69 Instrument Supplies 57679 Ionics Instrument Business Group 82.73 Lab Supplies 57680 Irvine Technology Corporation 7,618.00 Temporary Employment Service 57681 IDM Controls,Inc. 258.63 Instrument Supplies 57682 J&L Industrial Supply 582.84 Tools 57683 Johnstone Supply 905.09 Electrical Supplies 57684 Kelly Paper 615.38 Paper 57685 KW Communications 4,325.50 Prof. Serv.-Bushard Trunkline Repl.&Warner Relief Sewer Outreach Projects 57686 Lee&Ro,Inc. 2,602.70 Professional Services 5-22-R1 57687 Lucci's Gourmet Foods,Inc. 100.52 Meeting Expense 57688 Lytle Screen Printing 835.06 Printing Service 57689 LINJER 9,969.87 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 57690 Maverick Inspection,Ltd. 2,094.68 Fixed Viewing Crystals 57691 McMahan Business Interiors 12,594.27 Miscellaneous Office Supplies&Furniture 57692 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 470.18 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Maintenance Material 57693 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 10,674.29 Instrument Parts&Supplies 57694 Measurement Variables,Inc. 802.74 Electrical Supplies 57695 Mec Analytical System 8,725.00 Toxicity Analysis 57696 Medlin Controls Co. 1,366.28 Instrument Supplies 57697 Michael Asner Consulting 750.00 Prof. Serv.-RFP Handbook&Internal Policies&Procedures for Purchasing Div. G:1wp.dtaVin1210\CRANEIFAHR\FAHR20031DEC1Claims Paid Repot-113003.)ds EXHIBIT B fin1210Rc Page 3 of 8 121812003 Claims Paid From 11116/03 to 11130/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57698 Mile Square Golf Course 700.00 Meeting Expense-Community Outreach Workshop 57699 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 90.83 Janitorial Supplies 57700 Mission Uniform Service 5,111.60 Uniform Rentals 57701 MARMAC Field Services,Inc. 11,618.00 Professional Services P1-92 57702 MJK Construction 3,180.90 Professional Services-Fuel Tank 57703 National Plant Services,Inc. 6,390.00 Vacuum Truck Services 57704 Neal Supply Co. 241.95 Plumbing Supplies 57705 New Hermes,Inc. 103.13 Repairs&Maintenance Materials 57706 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,608.35 Industrial Turbine Oil&Gear Oil Compound 57707 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 6,943.52 Professional Services-Materials Testing,Inspection&Geotechnical Engrg. 57708 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,439.18 Office Supplies 57709 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 1,317.48 Electrical Parts,Supplies&Tools 57710 Orange Courier 171.45 Courier Services 57711 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 2,219.98 Lab&Plumbing Supplies 57712 Oxygen Service Company 838.06 Specialty Gases 57713 OCB Reprographics 8,940.69 Printing Service-MO 1126100 57714 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 998.59 Filters 57715 Pacific Be11M1orldCom 16.22 Telephone Service 57716 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 57717 Pacific Mechanical Supply 210.07 Plumbing Supplies 57718 Pacific Publishers 89.72 Publication 57719 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 164.03 Tires 57720 Parts Unlimited 815.78 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 57721 PenValve 112.59 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57722 Perkin Elmer Corporation 1,121.75 Lab Parts&Supplies 57723 Polydyne,Inc. 13,560.29 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 57724 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 463.45 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 57725 Primary Source Office Furnishings,Inc. 2,923.11 Office Furniture 57726 Project Management Institute 154.00 Membership 57727 Propulsion Controls Engineering 794.59 Repairs&Maintenance Services 57728 Protech Petroleum Services,Inc. 13,615.14 Annual Underground Storage Tank Maintenance Inspection 57729 PVF Sales,Inc. 248.51 Pipe 57730 Quinn Shepherd Machinery Co. 131.24 Oil Filters 57731 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,551.92 Trash Removal 57732 Raney Industries 870.00 Repairs&Maintenance Services 57733 Reliastar 9,559.85 Employee Basic Life Insurance Premium 57734 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 1,992.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57735 RBF Consulting 6,004.54 Engineering Services 2-24-1 57736 RPM Electric Motors 1,772.45 Pump,Motor and Misc. Supplies 57737 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 21,202.50 Construction-Manhole Rehabilitation Program 57738 Schwing America,Inc. 51.12 Mechanical Supplies 57739 Scicon Technologies Corp. 3,978.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57740 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 649.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance&Calibration Service 57741 Seaventures 5,550.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 57742 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 3,138.38 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 57743 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 124.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57744 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 355.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57745 Smardan Supply Company 52.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies G:1wp.dtalfin12101CRANEIFAHRIFAHR20031DEC1Clairns Paid Report-113003.)ds EXHIBIT�B (fn/21011c Page 4 of 8 12/ev2003 e Claims Paid From 11116103 to 11/30103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57746 So.Cal.Gas Company 23,719.32 Natural Gas 57747 Southern California Edison 2,153.51 Power 57748 Standard Supply&Equipment Co.,Inc. 1,607.72 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57749 Stanley Steamer International,Inc. 442.50 Carpet Cleaning Services 57750 Summit Steel 938.58 Metal 57751 Suncor Stainless,Inc. 61.54 Lab Supplies 57752 Sunset Ford 14.04 Automotive Parts&Supplies 57753 Sunset Industrial Parts 2,282.20 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57754 Super Power Products 646.50 Janitorial Supplies 57755 Symcas-TSG 1,381.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 57756 SBC 17.47 Telephone Service 57757 SPX Valves&Control 1,155.23 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57758 Taylor-Dunn 114.04 Electric Cart Parts 57759 Teletrac, Inc. 245.00 Monthly Air-Time Service Fee&Software/Hardware Maint.For Vehicle Tracking Sys. 57760 Terminix International 350.00 Pest Control 57761 Tetra Tech,Inc. 1,041.52 Professional Services 7-37 57762 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 20,196.91 Mechanical Parts&Supplies&Equipment 57763 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 186.62 Locks&Keys 57764 Southern California Trane Service 9,909.00 Elec. Equip.Service Contract&Install(2)Sets of Backdraft Dampers in A/C Units 57765 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 600.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 57766 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 170.30 Automotive Supplies 57767 TCH Associates,Inc. 595.07 Lab Supplies 57768 US Filter Corporation 1,159.00 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 57769 U-Line 94.93 Burlap Bags 57770 Ultra Scientific 49.60 Lab Supplies 57771 The Unisource Corporation 134.25 Office Supplies 57772 United Parcel Service 29.32 Parcel Services 57773 Defense Finance and Accounting 9,280.16 Professional Services J-85-Naval Post Graduate School 57774 Universal Flooring Systems,Inc. 3,107.00 Carpeting-Mechanical Maintenance Offices,Lunch Room&Locker Rooms 57775 Universal Specialties,Inc. 391.28 Mechanical&Plumbing Parts&Supplies 57776 Urban Alternatives 1,946.00 Professional Services-1-10 57777 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 256.28 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57778 US Filter Westates Carbon 2,446.91 Carbon Filters 57779 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 10,854.00 Temporary Employment Service 57780 Varian,Inc. 82.20 Lab Parts&Supplies 57781 Verizon California 5,764.59 Telephone Services 57782 Verne's Plumbing 1,435.00 Service Contract-Repair Backflow Devices 57783 Vision Service Plan 9,073.92 Vision Service Premium 57784 Vortex,Inc. 769.40 Door Repairs 57785 VWR Scientific Products 6,198.71 Lab Parts&Supplies 57786 The Wackenhut Corporation 11.602.02 Security Guards 57787 Waco Filter 298.65 Filters 57788 Waste Markets 15.696.83 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Marl.Removal 57789 Water Systems Cleaning Co. 12,985.00 Maint.Serv.-Remove&Replace Scrubber Media in Scrubber No.9 at Pit. 1 57790 Waxie Sanitary Supply 358.92 Janitorial Supplies 57791 WEF 170.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 57792 WEFTEC 695.00 Project Management Office Training Registration 57793 Xerox Corporation 5.808.83 Fax&Copier Leases G:\wp.dta\in\2101CRANEIFAHR\FAHR20031DEC\Cla ms Paid Report-113003.)ds EXHIBIT B fin/210nc Page 5 of 8 12/8/2003 Claims Paid From 11/16103 to 11/30103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57794 Yamato Scientific America,Inc. 60.95 Lab Parts&Supplies 57795 California Bank&Trust 3,140.00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention 57796 James E.Colston 846.87 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57797 Ricardo A.Gallegos 80.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57798 Randy E. Harris 184.39 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57799 Jesse J. Lechner 130.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57800 Selwyn D. Mansell 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57801 Theodore M.Mauter 190.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57802 Umesh N.Murthy 148.56 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57803 Ddaze Phuong 130.00 Meetinglfraining Expense Reimbursement 57804 Kenneth L. Ramey 206.94 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57805 SARBS-CWEA 70.00 Meetinglfraining Expense Reimbursement 57806 Paula A.Zeller 231.20 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57807 Employee Activity Committee 248.00 Employee Recognition&Activities 57808 Ernest Mast&Chris Daly 1,123.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57809 PRSA-Orange County Chapter 62.00 Communications Meeting Registration 57810 SARBS 375.00 Plant 2 Operations Meeting Registration 57811 Tomko,Mark 1,653.46 Employee Computer Loan Program 57812 Innerline Engineering 32,364.45 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 57813 Orange County Sanitation District 678,973.99 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 57814 Regents of Univ.of California 31,233.12 Professional Services J-85-Naval Post Graduate School 57815 Southern California Edison 106,540.36 Power 57816 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 241,900.78 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 57817 Airgas Safety, Inc. 1,563.46 Safety Supplies 57818 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 83.84 Telephone Service 57819 California Relocation Services,Inc. 236.25 Office Moving/Relocation Services 57820 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 57821 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 57822 County Sanitation District No.70 5,440.00 Olfactometry Lab Expense 57823 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 404.33 Medical Screening 57824 Electra-Bond, Inc. 23,424.85 Repairs&Maintenance Services 57825 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,868.20 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 57826 Employment Development Dept. 1,110.16 State Unemployment Tax 57827 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 57828 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 57829 Hewlett-Packard Express Services 419.00 Software Support 57830 City of Huntington Beach 24,197.68 Water Use 57831 Industrial Metal Supply 239.59 Metal 57832 Internal Revenue Service 450.00 Wage Garnishment 57833 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,691.78 Dues Deduction 57834 Irvine Ranch Water District 39.74 Water Use 57835 J&B Auto Parts 497.92 Auto Parts&Supplies 57836 Mayer, Brown,Rowe&Maw, L.L.P. 5,005.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocacy 57837 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 171.35 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57838 Mellon Trust 23,582.30 Investment Custodian Bank 57839 Mid-West Associates 795.27 Pump Supplies 57840 National Bond&Trust 2,072.37 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 57841 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 4,997.50 On-Site Training-Custom Hands-On Hydraulics G:Iwp.dtaUn12101CRANEIFAHRIFAHR20031DECIClalms Paid Report-113003.)ds EXHIBIT B W210nc Page 6 of 8 12/812003 ' . r Claims Paid From 11/16/03 to 11130/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57842 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 296.25 Steel Tags 57843 OCDM Marketing 2,818.19 Processing Fee-Warner Neighborhood Public Notice Mailing&Postage 57844 OCEA 561.61 Dues Deduction 57845 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 57846 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 57847 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,602.00 Dues Deduction 57848 Popular Paver Rental 14,562.20 Construction-Repair(3)Sink Holes in City of Tustin 57849 Richard Chang Associates,Inc. 4,798.40 On-Site Training-Building A Dynamic Team&Meetings That Work 57850 Safetycare,Inc. 237.05 Safety Video 57851 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 57852 Sparkletts 1,645.26 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 57853 SBC 1,072.50 Telephone Service 57854 Thompson Publishing Group 329.00 Publication 57855 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 230.00 Elevator Maintenance 57856 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 57857 Verizon California 562.36 Telephone Service 57858 Voided Check - - 57859 WEF 134.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 57860 James L.Burror 400.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57861 Aplon,Ken Jr. 1,150.62 Employee Computer Loan Program 57862 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,065.00 Administration Fee-Supplemental Sewer Service Fee Adjustments&Cancellations 57863 Airgas Safety, Inc. 653.07 Safety Supplies 57864 AT&T 51.22 Telephone Service 57865 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 415.89 Electrical Supplies 57866 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 47.71 Plumbing Supplies 57867 CMAA 140.00 Engineering&Construction Meeting Registration(Const.Mgmt.Assoc.of America) 57868 Dobbertin&Associates 2,300.00 Professional Services-CAD Design for Simulator 57869 G.F.O.A. 630.00 Accounting Training Registration 57870 Hirsch&Company 9.00 FOG Report Price Adjustment Refund 57871 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,055.14 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 57872 City of Newport Beach 56.31 Water Use 57873 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 517.68 Plumbing Supplies 57874 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 168.32 Water Use 57875 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 6.41 Mechanical Parts 57876 Christina M.Thomas 471.45 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57877 U.S Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 57878 Chloe D.Dao 175.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57879 Chuck M.Forman 529.01 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57880 Michelle R.Hetherington 226.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57881 Tyler T.Hoang 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57882 Michael J.Mengel 518.70 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57883 Michael D.Moore 263.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57884 Matthew P.Smith 230.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57885 Robert J.Taylor 741.45 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57886 Lisa L.Tomko 1,603.62 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57887 Daniel R.Tremblay 1,819.05 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57888 Yu-Li Tsai 1,911.35 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57889 Braze,Edward 1,088.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program G:1wp.diaTiin12101CRANEIFAHRIFAHR2M31DEC\Claims Paid Report-113003.x1s EXHIBIT B fin/210nc Page 7 of 8 12/e12003 Claims Paid From 11/16103 to 11/30103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57890 Burks,Don 903.95 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57891 Hurst,Michael 903.95 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57892 Johnson,George 1.247.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57893 Kaczmarek,Richard 1,247.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57894 Margaretis,Steve 815.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57895 Michele Russo Trust 1,318.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57896 Ramos,Fernando 433.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57897 Rischard,Theodore 251.42 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57898 Rose Dailies Trust 1,247.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57899 Springstead,Kathleen 1,318.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57900 Stuart,David 88.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57901 Torres,Carlos 1,247.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57902 Tye,Michael 618.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57903 Wendy's Consolidated Trust 1,318,23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57904 Williams,Paul 1,247.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 8,773,903.52 Payroll Disbursements 31605-31697 Employee Paychecks $ 156,508.35 Biweekly Payroll 11/26/03 31698-31883 Employee Paychecks $ 85,159.06 Retroactive Salary Adjustments 92032-92537 Direct Deposit Statements 951,432.39 Biweekly Payroll 11/26/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,193,099.80 Wire Transfer Payments U.S. Bank $ 132,916.60 November Interest Payment on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 132,916.60 Total Claims Paid 11116/03-11130103 $ 10,099,919.92 Glwp.dtalfinl210ICRANEIFAHRIFAHR2003IDECIClairns Paid Report-113003.xls EXHIBIT B� , fin121OAc Page 8 of 8 12181203 ti` BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 01/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 8 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than S250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District. In general, you must disclose the basis of the conflict by identifying the name of the firm or individual who was the contributor. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308. please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. SUMMARY See attached listing. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 12/01/03 — 12/15/03 and 12/16/03— 12/31/03 C:\Documents and Settings\pope\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKBF\Item 8.ClaimsPaid.doc Revised: 06/04/03 t A Claims Paid From 12/01103 to 12/16103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 57905 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. $ 66,261.10 Professional Services J-73-2 57905 Brown&Caldwell 153,936.05 Professional Services P1-37 and CMOMNVDR 57906 Carollo Engineers 74,863.51 Professional Services J-25-4 57907 City of Seal Beach 74,571.35 Cooperative Projects 57908 CH2M Hill 33,348.49 Professional Services J-40-6 57909 Dell Direct Sales 39,226.28 (2) 1750 Servers&(10)Printers 57910 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 126,758.09 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 57911 Parsons, Inc. 159,275.54 Engineering Services J-42 57912 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 88,643.17 Sodium Hypochlorite 57913 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 170,650.00 Construction-Manhole Rehabilitation Program 57914 SWRCB Accounting Office 41,420.00 NPDES Permit Fee 57915 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 212,059.91 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 57916 U.S. Metro Group,Inc. 26,235.00 Janitorial& Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 57917 U.S. Peroxide 48,149.27 Hydrogen Peroxide 57918 Union Bank of California 45,909.10 Construction 1-2-4,Retention 57919 UBS Financial Services,Inc. 30,149.69 Remarketing Fee-1992 Series Advanced Refunding COPS 57920 ARB, Inc. 284,796.42 Construction 11-22 57921 J F Shea Construction, Inc. 56,423.32 Construction J-71-3 57922 Ken Thompson, Inc. 111.870.00 Construction 5-56 57923 Steve P Rados, Inc. 413,181.90 Construction 1-2-4 57924 A Tint of Glass 150.00 Window Tinting 57925 Adult Day Care Services of O.C. 307.09 Banners-Community Outreach for Bushard Trunkline Project 57926 Airborne Express 88.49 Air Freight 57927 Airgas-West 45.26 Demurrage 57928 Airgas Safety,Inc. 1,003.91 Safety Supplies 57929 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 377.74 Instrument Supplies 57930 American Training Resources, Inc. 537.31 Safety Videos 57931 Arch Wreless 1,616.17 Airtime, Service&Equipment 57932 Archie Ivy, Inc. 3,800.00 Construction-Installation of(2)Speed Humps&Striping 57933 Atlantis Pool Care 500.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 57934 ASAP Software Express 842.84 Software Maintenance 57935 AT&T Wireless Services 4,027.90 Wireless Phone Services 57936 AT&T Wireless Services 3,094.27 Wireless Phone Services-Flow Meters J-73-2 57937 Baker Tanks 1,206.77 Tank Rentals 57938 Barrett Engineered Pumps 436.37 Pump 57939 Battery Specialties 444.62 Batteries 57940 Black&Veatch Corporation 13,271.47 Engineering Services J-87 57941 Brenton Safety, Inc. 6,727.82 Electrical Safety Equipment 57942 Bush&Associates, Inc. 1,964.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 57943 California Auto Collision 5,984.39 Vehicle Repairs-V-455 57944 Callan Associates,Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 57945 Ce112Cell 57.48 Phones&Accessories 57946 Clean Street, Inc. 350.00 Street Sweeping Services 57947 Clickguard Corporation 659.00 Printer Service Agreement firv21OAc EXHIBIT A H:WeptlfinlEXCEL.dta1220APSHARE1Claims Paid Report=-030aims Paid Report-121503.)ds Page 1 of 7 1/13/2004 Claims Paid From 12/01/03 to 12115/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57948 Coast Fire Equipment 1,089.46 Fire Extinguishers,Inspection&Servicing 57949 Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 850.00 Analysis of Wastewater,Industrial Wastewater&Biosolids 57950 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 12,500.00 Prof. Services-Additions& Revisions to IERP-Volume 2 57951 CompuMaster 2,725.00 On-Site Training-Outlook 57952 Consolidated Elect. Distributors 3,207.32 Electrical Supplies 57953 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 221.03 Plumbing Supplies 57954 Cooper Cameron Corporation 216.51 Engine Supplies 57955 Cooper Energy Services 4.13 Freight 57956 Corporate Express 1,849.53 Office Supplies 57957 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 155.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 57958 Cortech Engineering 13,961.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57959 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 367.32 Maint.Agreement-Repair/Installation of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios 57960 County Wholesale Electric Co. 148.24 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57961 Crane Veyor Corp. 1,686.28 Repairs&Maintenance-Power Cord Reel Assembly 57962 Cytec Industries, Inc. 18,376.37 Chemicals/Solutions 57963 CASA 375.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 57964 CGvL Engineers 911.00 Engineering Services P2-82 57965 CGvL Engineers 17,215.22 Engineering Services P1-94 57966 CMAA 360.00 Membership-Construction Management Association of America 57967 CPI International 1,221.25 Lab Supplies 57968 CSMFO 35.00 CAFR Award Application Fee for Year Ended 6/30/03 57969 CWEA Membership 291.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 57970 David's Tree Service 3,525.00 Tree Maint.Service 57971 Del Mar Analytical 3,776.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 57972 Diamond H Recognition 100.66 Employee Service Awards 57973 Douglass Truck Bodies,Inc. 323.25 Towing/Transporting Fees 57974 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 418.21 Paint Supplies 57975 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 605.16 Electrical Supplies 57976 Ecology Control Industries 17,027.32 Hazardous Waste Disposal 57977 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 653.10 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 57978 Enchanter, Inc. 3,600.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 57979 Environmental Resource Association 1,432.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 57980 Ferguson Enterprises,Inc.#677 3,144.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 57981 First American Real Estate Solutions 647.50 Orange County Property Information 57982 Fisher Scientific 5,411.41 Lab Supplies 57983 Flo-Systems, Inc. 33.20 Pump Supplies 57984 Fluor Enterprises, Inc. 6,825.67 Engineering Services J-84 57985 Foodcraft Coffee& Refreshment Services 563.10 Meeting Supplies 57986 Full Spectrum Analytics 4,239.80 Instrument Repairs&Service 57987 City of Fullerton 271.99 Water Use 57988 Garratt-Callahan Company 70.00 Chemicals 57989 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 3,575.88 Belt Filter Press Supplies 57990 Goldenwest Window Service 2,547.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990015 57991 Grainger, Inc. 680.14 Electrical Parts&Supplies 57992 Graphic Distributors 1,939.50 Photographic Supplies fin21011c EXHIBIT A H:\dept\fin\EXCEL.dta\2201APSHARE\Claims Paid Report102-031Claims Paid Report-121503.)ds Page 2 of 7 1/13244 Claims Paid From 12101/03 to 12/15/03 ` Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57993 Guarantee Records Management 285.95 Off-Site Records Storage 57994 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 1,430.80 Lab Parts,Supplies&Batteries 57995 Hagemeyer North America 5,820.29 Prescription Safety Glasses 57996 Harold Primrose Ice 55.50 Ice For Samples 57997 Hill Brothers 20,639.26 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 57998 Home Depot 901.91 Misc. Repair&Maintenance Material 57999 Industrial Distribution Group 1,917.13 Mechanical Parts,Supplies,Tools&Oil 58000 Industrial Metal Supply 70.01 Metal 58001 Innerline Engineering 740.00 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 58002 Innovative Net Systems 2,050.00 Trawl Nets 58003 Intratek Computer, Inc. 540.00 Network&Server Maintenance 58004 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 234.00 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 58005 J&B Auto Parts 35.49 Automotive Supplies 58006 J R Filanc Construction 11,655.47 Construction-Repair Sludge Line at Plant 2 58007 Kforce, Inc. 15,167.83 Temporary Employment Services 58008 Kings County Tax Collector 11.395.20 Property Taxes 58009 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 59.55 Publication 58010 Lee&Ro, Inc. 6,375.00 Professional Services P1-93 58011 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 411.43 Meeting Expense 58012 LINJER 4,730.00 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 58013 Malcolm Pimie, Inc. 12,818.08 Engineering Services J-79 58014 Marden Susco, Inc. 2,138.84 Plumbing Supplies 58015 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 2,530.06 Executive Disability Plan Premium 58016 McKenna Engineering&Equipment Co., Inc. 276.00 Filters 58017 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 83.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58018 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 681.46 Repairs&Maintenance Services 58019 Medlin Controls Co. 139.47 Instrument Parts&Supplies 58020 Megger 1,568.12 Software 58021 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 5,247.64 Repairs&Maintenance Services 58022 Mission Uniform Service 2,096.80 Uniform Rentals 58023 Moody's Investor's Service 5,000.00 1993 Certificates of Participation Maintenance Fees 58024 MARMAC Field Services, Inc. 5,070.00 Professional Services P1-92 58025 National Plant Services, Inc. 440.00 Vacuum Truck Services 58026 Neal Supply Co. 750.80 Plumbing Supplies 58027 City of Newport Beach 8.66 Water Use 58028 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 1,514.89 Industrial Turbine Oil 58029 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 5,755.32 Professional Services-Materials Testing, Inspection&Geotechnical Engrg. 58030 The Norco Companies 170.78 Mail Delivery Service 58031 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 919.95 Steel Tags 58032 Office Depot Business Services Div. 606.75 Office Supplies 58033 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 84.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58034 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 181.16 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 58035 Oxygen Service Company 1,186.08 Specialty Gases 58036 OCB Reprographics 3,573.07 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 58037 Pacific Mechanical Supply 170.68 Plumbing Supplies fin/2109c EXHIBIT A H:ldeptltin\EXCEL.dta12201APSHARE\Claims Paid Repart102-031Claims Paid Report-121503.)ds Page 3 of 7 1/13/2004 Claims Paid From 12/01/03 to 12/15103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58038 Parker Supply Company 987.37 Mechanical Seal 58039 PenValve 279.99 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 58040 Pixelpushers, Inc. 6,050.00 Prof.Serv.-Design,Implement,Construct&Install a Corporate Intranet Site 58041 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 30.78 Electrical Supplies 58042 Power Measurement USA, Inc. 1,051.64 Computer Hardware/Software 58043 PrinterGuy 583,57 Printer Maintenance 58044 Progressive Business Publications 299.00 Subscription 58045 Project Management Institute 50.90 Publication 58046 Protech Petroleum Services, Inc. 1,840.00 Professional Services-Testing of(2)Tank Systems at Blower Bldg. 58047 Pryco, Inc. 1,737.50 Computer Hardware/Software 58048 PCS Express, Inc. 553.63 Courier Service 58049 PRIMA: Public Risk Management Assoc- 310.00 Membership 58050 PVF Sales, Inc. 476.41 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 58051 R. L.Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 58052 Rainin Instrument,L.L.C. 190.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 58053 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,925.22 Employee Life Ins.Premium,Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ins.Payroll Deductions 58054 Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Area Sewer Dist. 17,558.33 Cooperative Projects 58055 RJN Group, Inc. 697.50 Tax on CMMS Consulting Services Contract for Period 7/1/03-7/l/04 58056 RPM Electric Motors 1,778.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58057 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 19,244.42 Professional Services Ocean Monitoring,P-179,P-185& Buoy Deployment 58058 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 259.69 Tools 58059 Shred-It, Los Angeles 840.00 Records Destruction Services 58060 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 378.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58061 Siemens Building Technologies 1,186.00 Professional Services-Admin. Bldg.Automation System Troubleshooting 58062 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 143.72 Lab Supplies 58063 Smith Pipe&Supply 98.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58064 Smith-Emery Company 4,870.00 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 58065 South Coast Systems, Inc. 260.00 Instrument Supplies 58066 Specialized Environmental, Inc. 7,588.00 Construction-Removal&Disposal of Flooring Materials 58067 Spex Certiprep, Inc. 784.58 Lab Parts&Supplies 58068 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 107.83 Stationery&Office Supplies 58069 Sunset Industrial Parts 38.33 Mechanical Supplies 58070 Super Chem Corporation 487.63 Chemicals 58071 Synegi, Inc. 14,023.19 Software 58072 SARBS-CWEA 45.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc. 58073 SETAC 110.00 O&M Training Registration 58074 SPEC Services, Inc. 16,846.20 Engineering Services J-33-1 58075 Tekdraulics, Inc. 1,451.61 Mechanical Supplies 58076 Teledyne Electronic Tech. 175.81 Instrument Parts&Supplies 58077 Terminix International 175.00 Pest Control 58078 The Walking Man, Inc. 350.00 Construction Notice Distribution-Bushard Trunk Sewer Replacement 58079 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 333.91 Biosolids Analysis 58080 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,604.02 Mechanical Supplies 58081 ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation 4,752.00 Elevator Maintenance 58082 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services ffnr210nc EXHIBIT A H:Wept\fin\EXCEL.dta\220\APSHARE\Claims Pafd Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-121503.)ds Page 4 of 7 1113/20 1 - Claims Paid From 12/01/03 to 12/15103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58083 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 151.53 Locks&Keys 58084 Townsend Public Affairs 5,000.00 Legislative&Executive Advocate for Grant Funding 58085 Southern California Trane Service 18,134.00 Replacement of(2)25-Ton Roof-Packaged A/Cs at Plt. 1 Power Bldg.3-A 58086 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 9,771.91 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 58087 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 39.02 Automotive Supplies 58088 TEKsystems 19,934.00 Temporary Employment Services 58089 Ultra Scientific 29.31 Lab Supplies 58090 The Unisource Corporation 168.74 Stationery&Office Supplies 58091 United Parcel Service 1,594.13 Parcel Services 58092 Update International, Inc. 6,966.66 On-Site Training-Machinery Improvement Skills 58093 US Filter Westates Carbon 5,015.05 Carbon Filters 58094 Vapex, Inc. 10,503.38 Instrument Parts&Supplies 58095 Varian,Inc. 3,935.10 Lab Parts&Supplies 58096 Verizon California 315.78 Telephone Services 58097 Vortex Corp. 421.30 Door Repairs at Human Resources Building 58098 VWR Scientific Products 3,500.11 Lab Supplies 58099 The Wackenhut Corporation 12,480.21 Security Guards 58100 The Wall Street Journal 343.72 Subscription 58101 Waste Markets 13,969.19 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed MaYI. Removal 58102 Western City 63.00 Subscription 58103 Wilson Supply, Inc. 1,401.59 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58104 Xerox Corporation 4,673.91 Fax&Copier Leases 58105 Ricardo A.Gallegos 95.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58106 W.Doug Hauser 190.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58107 Mike J.Herrera 130.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58108 John Mirkovich 46.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58109 Michael D.Moore 109.81 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58110 Kimberly J.Tolsma 100.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58111 Jane H.Tran 713.66 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58112 Tadeo G.Vitko 856.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58113 Ater, Marie 650.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58114 Cole,Lloyd 256.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58115 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 600.00 Administrative Processing Fee for Supplemental Sewer Fee Adjustments/Cancellations 58116 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 975.00 Administrative Processing Fee for Supplemental Sewer Fee Adjustments/Cancellations 58117 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 255.00 Administrative Processing Fee for Supplemental Sewer Fee Adjustments/Cancellations 58118 Deckard,Jill 1,247.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58119 Keife,Patrick 256.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58120 Kim Royster&Thomas Tucker 88.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58121 Law,James 66.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58122 McCarthy, Mary 492.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58123 Moreno, Roland 1,318.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58124 Nobles,Frank 2,220.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58125 Orange County Sanitation District 2,192.71 Petty Cash Reimb. 58126 Shigekawa,William 256.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 58127 Smith,Greg 256.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program fn/210nc EXHIBIT A H:ldeptlfin\EXCEL.dta12201APSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-031Claims Paid Report-121503.)ds Page 5 of 7 1/13/2004 Claims Paid From 12/01/03 to 12/16/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58128 Coral Energy Resources, L.P. 259,389.66 Natural Gas 58129 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 35,343.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 58130 Oracle Corp 34,788.74 Computer Maintenance&Software Updates 58131 Orange County Sanitation District 1,550,136.28 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 58132 Southern California Edison 72,486.42 Power 58133 Ken Thompson, Inc. 25,735.00 Construction 5-56 58134 Airborne Express 94.80 Air Freight 58135 Airgas Safety, Inc. 1,791.58 Safety Supplies&Equipment 58136 American Fildelity Assurance Company 132.00 Employee Cancer Insurance 58137 American Red Cross 1,257.00 CPR Training&Miscellaneous Supplies 58138 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 132.62 Telephone Service 58139 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 58140 Compressor Components Of California 1,248.00 Coil Cleaning&Testing&Compressor Parts 58141 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 1,424.05 Electrical Supplies 58142 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,408.18 Plumbing Supplies 58143 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 58144 CWEA Membership 97.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 58145 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,868.20 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 58146 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 58147 Franchise Tax Board 436.69 Wage Garnishment 58148 Government Finance Officers Association 480.00 CAFR Award Application Fee for Year Ended 6/30/03 58149 Graybar Electric Company 60.83 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58150 Industrial Metal Supply 2,851.06 Metal 58151 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 194.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58152 Internal Revenue Service 450.00 Wage Garnishment 58153 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,732.78 Dues Deduction 58154 Jobs Available, Inc. 99.00 Notices&Ads 58155 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,338.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58156 National Bond&Trust 2,072.37 U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 58157 NetIQ Corporation 359.82 Software Maintenance 58158 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 60.85 Lab Parts&Supplies 58159 OCEA 570.86 Dues Deduction 58160 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 58161 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 58162 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,602.00 Dues Deduction 58163 PenValve 198.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58164 PinnacleOne Institute 5,672.18 Professional Services J-33-1A 58165 Pyramid Screening Technology 4,499.00 Notices and Ads 58166 Safety Design, Inc. 4,982.50 LOTO Panel Devices-Safety 58167 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 115.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58168 Smith-Emery Company 4,234.00 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 58169 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 58170 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 1,116.48 Annual Waste Discharge Requirement Fee 58171 State Water Resources Control Board 5,668.00 Annual NPDES Permit Fee 58172 Summit Steel 1,367.60 Metal fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A _ H:ldeptlfin\EXCEL.dta12201APSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-031Claims Paid Report-121503.)ds Page 6 of 7 111=0a4 Claims Paid From 12/01/03 to 12115/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58173 SBC 20.95 Telephone Services 58174 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,260.49 Mechanical Supplies 58175 The Unisource Corporation 7,030.26 Stationer&Office Supplies 58176 United Parcel Service 46.53 Parcel Services 58177 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 58178 Verizon California 786.52 Telephone Services 58179 3CMA-City-County Communications 105.00 Communications Training Registration 58180 Nicholas J.Arhontes 3,434.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58181 David A. Bihl 130.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58182 Michael J.Boess 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58183 Deirdre E.Hunter 196.13 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 58184 Jeffrey T. Reed 1,437.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58185 CMTA 2003 Conference 46.00 Accounting Training Registration 58186 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fees 58187 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fees 58188 Oved Dagan Construction Co. 179,714.90 Construction J-90 58189 Nextel Communications 4,053.27 Cellular Phones&Air Time 58190 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 312.00 Underground Storage Tank, Hazardous Material,&State Fees Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,080,423.53 Payroll Disbursements 31884-32060 Employee Paychecks $ 371,616.04 Annual Payouts&Timesheet Correction 32061 -32157 Employee Paychecks 26,041.74 Adjustment to Annual Payouts&OCERS Reimbursements 32158-32266 Employee Paychecks 162,223.65 Biweekly Payroll 12/10/03 32267-32601 Employee Paychecks 947,948.25 Retroactive Salary Adjustments 32602-32603 Employee Paychecks 1,272.32 Annual Payout Adjustment&Retroactive Salary Adjustment 92538-93055 Direct Deposit Statements 961,897.31 Biweekly Payroll 12/10/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 2,470,999.31 Wire Transfer Payments JP Morgan Chase Bank $ 127,220.54 Societe Generale November Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation JP Morgan Chase Bank 34,150.35 November Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Lloyds TSB Bank plc 72,485,42 Letter of Credit Fee for 1992 Refunding COPs(08/01/03-11/01/03) Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 233,856.31 Total Claims Paid 12/01/03- 12/15/03 $ 7,785,279.15 fin/21011c EXHIBIT A H:\dept\fin\EXCEL.dta\220WPSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-121503.x1s Page 7 of 7 1/13/2004 Claims Paid From 12116103 to 12131/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 58191 Aanderaa Instruments $ 107,492.50 Coastal Physical Oceanographic Mooring 58192 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 34,470.00 Toxicity Testing 58193 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 37,525.27 Sodium Bisulfite 58194 Blue Cross of California 323,860.46 Medical Insurance Premium 58195 Carollo Engineers 793,558.50 Prof.Svrs.P2-66,Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Proj.&Microfiltration Demo.Proj. 58196 Delta Dental 56,122.77 Dental Insurance Plan 58197 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 104,342.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 58198 Entech Instruments,Inc. 73,370.87 Lab Parts&Supplies 58199 J F Shea Construction, Inc. 374,414.74 Construction P2-85 58200 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 73,831.20 Spill Clean-Up,SARI Access Road Maint.,Manhole Reh.&Foster Outfall Leak Repair 58201 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 51,727.96 Medical Insurance Premium 58202 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 161,973.97 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 58203 Kforce,Inc. 36,995.39 Temporary Employment Services 58204 Lee&Ro,Inc. 87,678.54 Professional Services 5-50,5-51&5-52 58205 Malcolm Pimie,Inc. 42,570.41 Professional Services 1-10 58206 Orange County Water District 1,227,649.87 Joint GWRS Project J-36 58207 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 362,774.90 Sodium Hypochlorite 58208 Polydyne,Inc. 97,517.73 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 58209 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 26,351.57 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 58210 So.Cal.Gas Company 25,570.99 Natural Gas 58211 State Water Resources Control Board 128,500.00 Annual NPDES Permit Fee 58212 Synagro Technologies, Inc. 377,694.50 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 58213 SPEC Services,Inc. 44,975.38 Engineering Services J-33-1 &P1-89 58214 Tranter PHE,Inc. 25,018.66 Repairs&Maintenance Services to Heat Exchanger 58215 U.S.Peroxide,L.L.C. 152,712.10 Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 58216 Valverde Construction,Inc. 32,005.00 Construction-Street Repairs at Various Locations 58217 Walden&Associates 27,019.37 Professional Services-Big Canyon Trunk Sewer 58218 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 728,738.77 Construction J-71-3,J-87&J-35-2 58219 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,332,699.00 Construction P1-37 58220 Southern Contracting Company 25.999.00 Construction J-33-IA 58221 Steve P Rados,Inc. 763,608.22 Construction 1-2-4 58222 Union Bank of California 85,473.40 Construction 1-2-4,Retention 58223 Orange County Sanitation District 40.999.40 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 58224 Aero Compressor,Inc. 884.33 Air Compressor Filter 58225 Air Duct Cleaning Company 985.00 Air Duct Cleaning Services 58226 Air Liquide America Corp. 419.74 Specialty Gases 58227 Airco Filter Service 730.17 Natural Gas Filters 58228 Airgas-West 6.60 Demurrage 58229 Airgas Safety,Inc. 2,130.99 Safety Supplies 58230 American Chemical Society 261.00 Membership 58231 American Industrial Hygiene Association 180.00 Membership 58232 American Society For Microbiology 258.00 Membership 58233 American Training Resources, Inc. 537.31 Safety Videos 58234 Gerardo Amezcua 190.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58235 Analysts,Inc. 1,961.21 Testing Kits 58236 Appleone Employment Service 4,126.86 Temporary Employment Services 58237 Aquarium Doctor 97.90 Human Resources Aquarium Service H:1dep11fin1EXCELdta1220kAPSHARBClaims Paid Report502-031Claims Paid Report-123103.)ds EXHIBIT B finr21011c Page 1 of 13 1/1912004 Claims Paid From 12116/03 to 12131/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58238 Arch Wireless 1,577.73 Airtime,Service&Equipment 58239 Arizona Instrument 641.00 Instrument Repairs&Calibration 58240 Ashbrook Corporation 520.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58241 Association of Energy Engineers 160.00 Membership 58242 AAAS 130.00 Membership-American Assoc.for the Advancement of Science 58243 ACS Hydraulics,Inc. 1,255.60 Mechanical Repair&Maintenance Services 58244 APCO 210.00 FCC License Fee-Operational Radio System 58245 AT&T Universal Biller 15,961.05 Telephone Service 58246 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 51.00 Telephone Service 58247 AT&T Wireless-TITAN 775.08 Cell Phones&Accessories 58248 AWSI 1,357.50 Department of Transportation Training Program 58249 Baker Tanks 3,689.70 Tank Rentals 58250 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 2,153.13 Telephone Equipment 58251 Barrett Engineered Pumps 437.54 Pump Supplies 58252 Basler Electric Company,Department 590 1,939.44 Electrical Supplies 58253 Beckman Instruments, Inc. 3,219.00 Instrument Repairs&Maintenance Services 58254 BioMerieux Vitek,Inc. 1.088.32 Lab Supplies 58255 Brown&Caldwell 9,171.54 Professional Services-Outfall Flow Meter Accuracy Test&Notices&Ads 58256 Bush&Associates,Inc. 7,588.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 58257 Business Objects Americas 13,535.00 Software Maintenance&Support 58258 BEC-Building Electronic Controls,Inc. 1,890.80 Fire Alarm System Maintenance,Repair&Quarterly Inspection 58259 California Industrial Supplies 401.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58260 Southern California Marine Institute 1,950.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 58261 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 18,233.02 Professional Services-Develop Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 58262 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 5,192.21 Computer Software/Hardware 58263 CompuMaster 5,675.00 On-Site Excel Training 58264 Consolidated Electrical Distributor 1,723.15 Electrical Supplies 58265 Consolidated Plastics Company 96.40 Lab Supplies 58266 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,648.80 Plumbing Supplies 58267 Cooper Cameron Corporation 847.64 Engine Supplies 58268 Cooper Energy Services 4.13 Freight 58269 Corporate Express 7,174.08 Office Supplies 58270 Cortech Engineering 4,232.12 Pump Supplies 58271 Cost Containment Solutions 484.49 Worker's Comp.Services 58272 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 280.00 Encroachment Permit Fees 58273 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 727.00 Inspection Fees-Underground Storage Tank Closures at Pit. 1 and Pit.2 58274 County Wholesale Electric Co. 673.69 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58275 Culligan of Orange County 75.00 Maint.Agreement-Cen Gen Water Softener System 58276 Cummins Allison Corp. 4,332.58 Office Equipment-Facsimile Signature Machine 58277 Cytec Industries 18,155.40 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 58278 CEM Corporation 82.61 Lab Parts&Supplies 58279 CWEA Membership 97.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 58280 David's Tree Service 2,975.00 Tree Maint.Service 58281 Del Mar Analytical 1,629.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 58282 Dell Computer 9,103.94 (1)Galaxy Server&Software/Hardware 58283 Diamond H Recognition 151.39 Employee Service Awards 58284 Digiterra,Inc. 8,723.64 Software/Hardware Upgrade-AS-400 Model 820 58285 Dodderer,Thomas 826.19 Employee Computer Loan Program H:tdepi in\EXCEL.(fta1220WPSHARBCIaims Paid Report102.031Claims Paid Report-123103.)ds EXHIBIT B W210/lc Page 2 of 13 1/19/20&- Claims Paid From 12116/03 to 12/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58286 Driver Alliant Insurance Service, Inc. 852.00 Excess Workers'Compensation 58287 DME,Inc. 541.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58288 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 16.16 Electrical Supplies 58289 Easy Frame Sign Company,Inc. 834.52 Printing-District Bumper Stickers&Window Decals 58290 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 648.55 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 58291 Employers Group 1,750.00 On-Site Training-Communicating With Tact&Diplomacy 58292 Enchanter,Inc. 2.700.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfa(l Inspection&Maintenance 58293 Engineering Central 49.99 Notices&Ads 58294 Equapac 2,043.18 Hydrochloric Acid 58295 ENS Resources,Inc. 15,000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 58296 Filarsky&Watt,L.L.P. 1,710.00 Prof. Services-SPMT Labor Negotiation Meetings&Special Services 58297 ReNET Corporation 24.961.18 Annual Maintenance-Electronic Document Management System 58298 Fisher Scientific 7,903.02 Lab Parts&Supplies 58299 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 334.46 Meeting Supplies 58300 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 24,174.93 Long-Term&Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium 58301 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 3,555.48 Gasoline 58302 Franklin Covey 560.24 Office Supplies 58303 G.E.Supply Company 170.48 Electric Parts 58304 Garratt-Callahan Company 853.38 Chemicals 58305 George T. Hall 109.33 Instrument Maintenance&Service 58306 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 18,148.18 Belt Filter Press Supplies 58307 Golden State Controls 379.80 Instrument Parts&Supplies 58308 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 185.16 Janitorial Supplies 58309 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 153.23 Lab Parts&Supplies 58310 Hach Company 1.960.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 58311 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 1.027.54 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58312 Hasco Oil Co.,Inc. 193.73 Grease 58313 Hill Brothers 16,315.16 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 58314 Home Depot 735.76 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 58315 Hopkins Technical Products 1,322.86 Instrument Repair Service 58316 Hub Auto Supply 1,103.35 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 58317 Impulse 62.03 Instrument Repair Service 58318 Industrial Distribution Group 2,527.20 Hardware 58319 Industrial Fabrics Corp. 14,800.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58320 Industrial Metal Supply 72.18 Metal 58321 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 477.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58322 Information Resources 625.00 Human Resources Service-Background Checks 58323 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 160.72 Lab Parts&Supplies 58324 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 694.49 Batteries for Vehicles&Carts 58325 Intratek Computer,Inc. 2,220.00 Network&Server Maintenance 58326 Iron Mountain 86.06 Bid Document Storage Fees P1-37&J-39 58327 Irvine Technology Corporation 21.472.00 Temporary Employment Services 58328 IDM Controls,Inc. 355.30 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58329 J&B Auto Parts 28.50 Auto Parts&Supplies 58330 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 186.16 Specialty Gases 58331 J.O'Brien Company, Inc. 421.24 Security Badge Supplies 58332 Jays Catering 2,362.94 Meeting Expenses 58333 Johnstone Supply 635.44 Electrical Supplies H:ldeptltin1EXCELdta1220%PSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-030aims Paid Report-123103.)ds EXHIBIT B tnn10nc Page 3 of 13 1/19/2004 Claims Paid From 12/16103 to 12131103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58334 J2 Printing Services 249.98 Printing-Forms 58335 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 39.35 Safety Supplies 58336 Lexis-Nexis 27.98 Books&Publications 58337 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 1,875.00 Human Resources Annual Training-Orange County Employment Relations Consortium 58338 Lifecom-Safety, Inc. 349.41 Instrument Repairs&Maintenance&Calibration Services 58339 Lucci's Gourmet Foods,Inc. 672.49 Meeting Expense 58340 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 520.00 Professional Services-Corrosion Engineering Survey 58341 Management Technologies 750.00 Professional Services-Project Management Consulting 58342 Mandic Motors 71.00 Towing Services 58343 Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. 923.50 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58344 Marden Susco, Inc. 2,138.84 Plumbing Supplies 58345 Matt Chlor,Inc. 3,594.10 Valves 58346 McMahan Business Interiors 5,562.06 Office Furniture-Ergonomic Chairs 58347 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,480.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58348 Mec Analytical System 8,433.00 Toxicity Analysis 58349 Medlin Controls Co. 191.04 Instrument Supplies 58350 Michael K.Strenstrum, PhD,P.E. 8,000.00 Professional Services-Oxygen Transfer Efficiency Test at Pit. 1 Aeration Basins 58351 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 18,559.63 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repair Services 58352 Mile Square Golf Course 25.00 Rental Equipment-Microphone for Ellis Avenue Community Workshop 58353 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 300.62 Janitorial Supplies 58354 Mission Uniform Service 1,941.42 Uniform Rentals 58355 Morgan Company 2,826.28 Crane Truck Repair&Maintenance Services-V397 58356 Myers Power Products,Inc. 1,342.73 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58357 Mine Safety Applicances Company 2,990.89 Instrument Supplies 58358 National Plant Services,Inc. 6,250.00 Vacuum Truck Services 58359 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 4,997.50 On-Site Training-Custom Hands-On Hydraulics 58360 Neal Supply Co. 191.80 Plumbing Supplies 58361 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 4,811.13 Gear&Hydraulic Oil 58362 Nodab 2,586.00 Chemicals 58363 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 123.20 Steel Tags 58364 Office Depot Business Services Div. 436.62 Office Supplies 58365 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 161.07 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58366 The Orange County Register 1,289.54 Subscription 58367 Orange Courier 133.00 Courier Services 58368 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 1,157.58 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 58369 Oxygen Service Company 1,518.97 Specialty Gases 58370 OCB Reprographics 1,536.30 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 58371 Pacific Bell/WorldCom 15.93 Telephone Service 58372 Pacific Mechanical Supply 190.01 Plumbing Supplies 58373 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 19,395.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58374 Parker Hannifin Corporation 478.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58375 Parker Supply Company 5,669.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58376 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 181.31 Tires 58377 Partners Consulting Services 18,240.00 Professional Services-FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 58378 Patriot Video Productions 418.29 Videos 58379 Power Electro Supply Co.,Inc. 14.48 Electrical Supplies 58380 Power Measurement USA,Inc. 3,600.00 Software 58381 Praxair Distribution,Inc. 160.01 Lab Parts&Supplies H:ldeptlfin\EXCELdtal2201APSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-0310aims Paid Report-123103.As EXHIBIT B fin/2101lc Page 4 of 13 1119/2004 Claims Paid From 12/16/03 to 12131/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58382 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 463.45 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 58383 Primary Source Office Furnishings,Inc. 5,703.37 Office Furniture 58384 Putzmeister-America 322.24 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58385 PAPA 55.00 O&M Training Registration 58386 Quinn Shepherd Machinery 766.21 Oil,Air&Fuel Filters 58387 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,730.33 Trash Removal 58388 Realtime Systems Corporation 6,810.80 Software Annual Maintenance&Support 58389 Red Wing Shoes 156.88 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 58390 Regents of Univ.of California 982.98 Professional Services J-85 58391 Reliastar 9,594.55 Employee Basic Life Insurance Premium 58392 Retrofit Parts&Components,Inc. 70.11 Air Filters 58393 Ricoh Business System 1,623.90 Color Copier Lease 58394 RPM Electric Motors 3,940.92 Pump Repairs 58395 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 347.22 Paint Supplies 58396 Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency 1,400.00 Membership 58397 Schwing America, Inc. 1,123.93 Pump Supplies 58398 Scottel Voice&Data.Inc. 2,284.80 Telephone System Maintenance 58399 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 82.40 Lab Supplies 58400 Smith-Emery Company 780.00 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 58401 Southern Counties Oil Co. 9,994.35 Diesel Fuel 58402 Southwest Air Balance Corp. 250.00 Professional Services P1-37 58403 Sparling Instruments,Inc. 350.00 Outfall Flow Meter Calibration&Maintenance Services 58404 Spectrum Video,Inc. 2,921.25 Professional Services-Board Room Audio-visual Design 58405 Spex Certiprep, Inc. 406.94 Lab Supplies 58406 Stanley Steamer International,Inc. 1,980.55 Carpet Cleaning Services 58407 Sunset Industrial Parts 717.85 Mechanical Supplies 58408 Super PC Memory 13.00 Freight 58409 Sy Nielson Service,Inc. 960.00 Instrument Supplies 58410 Symcas-TSG 1,381.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 58411 Systime Computer Corp. 600.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One World XE Support 58412 SARBS-CWEA 100.00 O&M Training Registration-California Water Environment Association 58413 SPX Valves&Control 1,151.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58414 Techno Coatings 13,110.00 Painting Services-Admin Bldg.,Source Control Interior Area 58415 Tetra Tech,Inc. 194.00 Professional Services 7-37 58416 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,727.36 Mechanical Supplies 58417 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 12.12 Locks&Keys 58418 Toshiba International Corporation 1,856.83 Electrical Supplies 58419 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 165.59 Automotive Supplies 58420 Ultra Scientific 257.00 Lab Supplies 58421 United States Treasury 16,992.75 Professional Services J-85-Naval Post Graduate School 58422 UC Regents 360.00 Mechanical Maintenance Training Registration 58423 US Filter Wiestates Carbon 3,905.94 Filter Carbon 58424 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 13,034.00 Temporary Employment Service 58425 Vapex, Inc. 342.65 Instrument Parts&Supplies 58426 Varian,Inc. 1,536.20 Lab Parts&Supplies 58427 Verizon California 526.60 Telephone Services 58428 Verne's Plumbing 225.00 Service Contract-Testing&Cert.Backttow Devices at Plts. 1 &2&Pump Sta. 58429 Vertex,Inc. 8,081.25 Software License-Vertex Payroll Tax Q Series H:ldeptVin%EXCELdtat2201APSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-031Gaims Peld Report.123103.)ds EXHIBIT B 1in/210ft Page 5 of 13 1/19/2004 Claims Paid From 12116/03 to 12131/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58430 Village Nurseries 228.69 Landscaping Supplies 58431 Villalobos&Associates 24,805.25 Professional Services-Collection System Siphon&Force Main Assessment 58432 Vision Service Plan-{CA} 9,140.64 Vision Service Premium 58433 Vocam USA, L.L.C. 403.19 Safety Video 58434 VWR Scientific Products 1,489.14 Lab Supplies 58435 The Wackenhut Corporation 11,844.67 Security Guards 58436 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 12,701.64 Engineering Service J-67 58437 Weber Scientific 281.29 Lab Supplies 58438 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 141.19 Safety Supplies 58439 WEF-Registration Dept. 530.00 Registration-Air Quality Meeting Registration 58440 WEF 544.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation&Compliance Meeting Registration 58441 Xerox Corporation 13,778.28 Fax/Copier Leases and Supplies 58442 York International 5,000.00 Start-Up&Programming York Microgateway at Chiller&Siemens Building 58443 California Bank&Trust 2,889.00 Construction J-33-1A, Retention 58444 Michael A.Berdis 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58445 James A.Carter 100.00 Meeting Training Expense Reimbursement 58446 Richard A.Castillon 999.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58447 Frank Chavez 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58448 Allan P.Dumlao 95.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58449 Martin G. England 1,329.63 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58450 Jerry F. Evangelista 698.66 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58451 Deirdre E. Hunter 393.33 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58452 Rachel J.Parker 1,010.15 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58453 Mahin Talebi 698.66 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58454 Edward M.Torres 121.99 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58455 Ernest N.Yeboah 239.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58456 Aquarium of the Pacific 123.45 Reimbursable Employee Activity Expense 58457 Cain,Gail 1,855.17 Employee Computer Loan Program 58458 Conex International 1,113.75 Professional Services 132-60 58459 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 58460 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 58461 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 58462 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 58463 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 58464 Kienow Associates,Inc. 15,195.88 Legal Services 1-2-4 58465 Orange County Sanitation District 862.17 Petty Cash Reimb. 58466 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 58467 Sudds,Charles 1,114.24 Employee Computer Loan Program 58468 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 192,032.99 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 58469 Orange County Sanitation District 659,213.36 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 58470 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 58471 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 58472 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 7,790.92 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 58473 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 58474 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 58475 Internal Revenue Service 450.00 Wage Garnishment 58476 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 3.568.78 Dues Deduction 58477 National Bond&Trust 1,813.73 U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions H:ldeptlfnlEXCELdta1220WPSHARE\Claims Paid Report102-031Ga1ms Paid Report-123103.)ds EXHIBIT B W21011c Page 6 of 13 1/19/20�h r - Claims Paid From 12/16103 to 12/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58478 OCEA 518.53 Dues Deduction 58479 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 58480 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 58481 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,062.00 Dues Deduction 58482 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 58483 United Way 280.00 Employee Contributions 58484 Voided Check - - 58485 American Express 25,858.95 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 58486 Atkins Americas,Inc. 34,607.12 Professional Services J-40-6 58487 Painewebber Incorporated 38,126.50 COP Remarketing Agreement 58488 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 81,878.09 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 58489 Airgas Safety,Inc. 35.06 Safety Supplies 58490 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 219.74 Mechanical Supplies 58491 American Airlines 3,630.50 Travel Services 58492 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 297.50 Telephone Service 58493 Environmental Management Consulting 3,915.00 Prof.Serv.-Data Analysis&Reporting&Ventilation Measurement for Belt Press Bldg. 58494 Environmental Microbiology Consulting 18,549.22 Professional Services J-40-6 58495 Franklin Covey 492.08 Office Supplies 58496 Fry's Electronics 1,568.46 Computer Supplies 58497 Hagemeyer North America 4,030.46 Prescription Safety Glasses 58498 Irvine Ranch Water District 44.83 Water Use 58499 League Of Ca Cities 5,000.00 Administration Meeting Expenses 58500 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 15,900.00 Software-Technical Seat 1-Yr. License 58501 Office Depot Business Services Div. 821.56 Office Supplies 58502 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 1,361.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58503 Terri L.Roberts 21.36 OCERS Withholding Refund on Dec.2000 Leave Payout 58504 Safetycare, Inc. 237.05 Safety Video 58505 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 880.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58506 SBC 969.54 Telephone Services 58507 Rule 222 Filings 184.56 Rule 222 Filings-Permit Fee 58508 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 6,104.59 Mechanical Supplies 58509 United Parcel Service 50.48 Parcel Services 58510 Verizon California 5.711.25 Telephone Services 58511 VI-Systems,Inc. 1,063.75 Professional Services-Microsoft Exchange Consulting for Disaster Recovery 58512 Waxie Sanitary Supply 78.58 Janitorial Supplies 58513 Juan J.Ambriz 148.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58514 Michael N.Morey 175.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58515 Robert J.Taylor 739.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58516 Kimberly J.Tolsma 100.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58517 Albonni,Bashar 903.95 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58518 County of Orange 5,107.20 Annexation Fee-J-77 58519 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 75.00 Administrative Processing Fee for Supplemental Sewer Fee Adjustments/Cancellations 58520 Deckard,Jill 903.95 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58521 Elliott,Lynn 1,110.75 Employee Computer Loan Program 58522 Gausewitz,Alfred 903.95 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58523 Guerrero,Francisca C.Leon 903.95 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58524 Hove,Bryce 903.95 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58525 Marchegiano, Debbie 2.018.45 Employee Computer Loan Program H:ldeptUinIEXCEL.dta12201NPSHARE1Claims Paid ReportX02-0310aims Paid Report-123103.)ds EXHIBIT B finl21011c Page 7 of 13 1/19/2004 Claims Paid From 12116103 to 12131103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58526 Ortiz, Ramon 903.95 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58527 Peek,David 903.95 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58528 Pooler,Dorothy 903.95 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58529 Reuss, Robert 903.95 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58530 Schneirson,Ron 1,247.76 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58531 Sexton,Gregory 1,247.76 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58532 T&J Performance,Inc. 2,688.36 Truck Parts&Repairs-Bumper-V389 58533 Wu,Janice 946.08 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 58534 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 58535 Air Products&Chemicals 26,294.06 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 58536 ARK Technologies 60,000.00 County of Orange Tax System Data Processing 58537 Basic Chemical Solutions, L.L.C. 42,813.63 Sodium Bisulfite&Caustic Soda 58538 Black&Veatch Corporation 97,290.43 Engineering Services 131-76,J-71-3,P2-85,J-87&Hydrogen Peroxide Project 58539 Boyle Engineering Corporation 47,803.03 Engineering Services I-2A 58540 Brown&Caldwell 29,281.98 Professional Services P1-37 58541 California Soil Products 81,765.76 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 58542 CASA 48,825.00 Membership&Contribution to Biosolids Program Fund 58543 CH2MH1ll 164,506.60 Professional Services J-40-6&J-40-7 58544 Dhamta Consulting 114,750.00 Prof.Serv.-EMT Coaching,Strategic Ping.Process Team Tmg.&EMT Leadership Survey 58545 Innerline Engineering 67,851.34 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 58546 IPMC c/o Parsons 1,107,696.00 Professional Services-Integrated Program Management 58547 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 172,419.33 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 58548 Mainline Information systems 35,746.06 Software/Hardware-DASD for AS/400 58549 Partners Consulting Services 45,840.00 Temporary Employment Services 58550 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 235,121.72 Sodium Hypochlorite 58551 Polydyne,Inc. 52,336.48 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 58552 Southern California Edison 83,438.65 Power 58553 Systime Computer Corp. 83,085.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One World XE Implementation 58554 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 173,208.23 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 58555 U.S. Metro Group, Inc. 26,235.00 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 58556 Waste Markets 59,414.94 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mafl. Removal 58557 Cora Constructors 124,605.00 Construction 7-7-2 58558 Insitufomt Technologies,Inc. 153,733.11 Construction 5-29-Rl 58559 Aanderaa Instruments 4,206.70 Coastal Physical Oceanographic Mooring 58560 Able Scale Repair 600.00 Loading Scales Quarterly Inspection 58561 Accurate Measurement Systems 512.72 Instrument Supplies 58562 Advance Business Graphics 3,413.42 Stationery&Office Supplies 58563 Air Duct Cleaning Company 3,927.00 Air Duct Cleaning Services 58564 Air Liquide America Corporation 2,561.66 Specialty Gases 58565 Airborne Express 26.06 Air Freight 58566 Airgas Safety, Inc. 3,217.92 Safety Supplies 58567 AliMed,Inc. 135.91 Computer Supplies 58568 Amot Control Corporation 219.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58569 Anixter,Inc. 880.10 Computer Software/Hardware 58570 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs, Inc. 750.00 Toxicity Testing 58571 Aspen Publishers,Inc. 209.70 Publication 58572 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin. Bldg.Atrium 58573 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,233.52 Telephone Conference Services H:ldeptlfMEXCEL.dta52201APSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-031Ctaims Paid Report•123103.)ds EXHIBIT B fn/21011c Page 8 of 13 1/19/20N Claims Paid From 12/16103 to 12/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58574 AT&T Universal Biller 2,976.98 Telephone Service 58575 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 71.16 Telephone Service 58576 AWWA 131.00 Membership-American Water Works Association 58577 Battery Specialties 1,026.91 Batteries 58578 Benz Compressed Air Systems,Inc. 801.32 Compressor Parts 58579 Bureau of Reclamation 22,308.00 Cost-Sharing Project J-36 58580 Caltrol,Inc. 1,492.61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58581 Cardlock Fuel Systems, Inc. 624.92 Fueling District Vehicles at Local Gas Stations 58582 Cashco,Inc. 670.54 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58583 Charles P.Crowley Co. 2,582.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58584 Compressor Components Of California 1,248.00 Coil Cleaning&Testing&Compressor Parts 58585 Consolidated Electrical Distributor 2,230.90 Electrical Supplies 58586 Cooper Cameron Corporation 174.30 Engine Supplies 58587 Corporate Express Imaging 1,256.46 Computer Supplies 58588 Corporate Express 8,909.57 Office Supplies 58589 Cortech Engineering 15,242.18 Pump Supplies 58590 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 35.00 Encroachment Permit Fees 58591 County Wholesale Electric Co. 581.42 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58592 Crane Veyor Corp. 2,771.13 Repair&Maintenance Services 58593 CALPELRA 480.00 Membership-Calif. Public Employers Labor Relations Assoc. 58594 CEM Corporation 752.81 Lab Supplies 58595 CR&R, Inc. 1,575.00 Container Rentals 58596 California Special Districts Association 357.00 Membership 58597 CSMFO 875.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 58598 Daniel Company,L.L.C. 10,499.25 Repairs&Maintenance Services to Primary Scrubber Complex 58599 Dapper Tire Co. 278.33 Truck Tires 58600 David's Tree Service 5,300.00 Tree Maint.Service 58601 Detection Instruments Corporation 8,586.85 Ins.Parts&Supplies 58602 Dickson's,Inc. 872.99 Air Conditioner Unit 58603 Dunkel Bros.Machinery Moving, Inc. 4,000.00 Equipment Moving Services 58604 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 93.14 Paint Supplies 58605 Dwyer Instruments,Inc. 266.17 Instrument Parts&Supplies 58605 DGA Consultants,Inc. 5,148.50 Professional Services-CCTV Data Evaluation 58607 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 163.73 Electrical Supplies 58608 Ecology Control Industries 15,009.84 Hazardous Waste Disposal 58609 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1,350.91 Medical Screening 58610 Enchanter,Inc. 3,600.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 58611 Environmental Resource Association 1,432.90 Lab Supplies 58612 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 129.28 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 58613 ENS Resources,Inc. 15,000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 58614 FedEx Corporation 72.92 Air Freight 58615 Fisher Scientific 4,744.39 Lab Supplies 58616 Five Star Metals,Inc. 343.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58617 Fluor Enterprises,Inc. 12,792.56 Engineering Services J-84 58618 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 298.20 Meeting Supplies 58619 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 251.06 Paint Supplies 58620 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 2,232.13 Truck Wash Tickets 58621 Franklin Covey 229.73 Office Supplies H:IdeptVinIEXCEL.dta1220WPSHARBClaims Paid Report102-030aims Paid Report-123103.)ds EXHIBIT B fin/21011c Page 9 of 13 1/19/2004 Claims Paid From 12/16/03 to 12131103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58622 Fry's Electronics 112.02 Computer Supplies 58623 Garland Manufacturing Co. 825.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58624 Garratt-Callahan Company 2,358.65 Chemicals 58625 Gastech 2,845.28 Instrument Parts&Supplies 58626 George T. Hall 562.99 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58627 George Yardley Co. 789.57 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58628 Grainger,Inc. 3,477.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58629 Graybar Electric Company 1,365.00 Software/Hardware 58630 Guarantee Records Management 233.16 Off-Site Records Storage 58631 GS Edwards Systems Technology 592.06 Maintenance&Repair Services-Fire Alarm System 58632 Haaker Equipment Company 402.06 Misc.Vehicle,Parts, Repairs&Service 58633 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 15,541.19 Lab Parts&Supplies 58634 Hagemeyer North America 1,070.54 Prescription Safety Glasses 58635 Harold Primrose Ice 138.75 Ice For Samples 58636 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 594.56 Instrument Parts&Supplies 58637 Hasco Oil Co., Inc. 193.73 Grease 58638 The Holman Group 907.20 Employee Assistance Program Premium 58639 Home Depot 193.94 Misc. Repair&Maintenance Material 58640 Horizon Technology 393.93 Lab Supplies 58641 Hydrotex 1,567.09 Lube Oil 58642 I. D.Industries, Inc. 19.42 Mechanical Supplies 58643 IDEXX Laboratories,Inc. 702.53 Lab Supplies 58644 Industrial Distribution Group 2,811.75 Mechanical Parts,Supplies, Paint&Hardware 58645 Industrial Metal Supply 1,264.55 Metal 58646 Inside EPA 635.00 ECM Publication 58647 Ionics Instrument Business Group 124.08 Lab Supplies 58648 Irvine Photo Graphics 249.98 Photographic Services 58649 J&L Industrial Supply 669.20 Tools 58650 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 4,500.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Digester#12 58651 Johnstone Supply 676.56 Electrical Supplies 58652 Kforce, Inc. 1,766.16 Temporary Employment Services 58653 Lewis&Lewis Enterprises 261.14 Office Supplies 58654 Long Beach Iron Works 1,885.63 Manhole Frames&Covers 58655 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 276.82 Meeting Expense 58656 Lustre-Cal 671.85 Printing-Wastehauler Decals 58657 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1,715.53 Welding Supplies 58658 Mandic Motors 99.00 Towing Services 58659 MarVac Electronics 87.31 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58660 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 1,328.95 Executive Disability Plan Premium 58661 McGarry Central 131.59 Office Equipment Repair&Maintenance Services 58662 McMahan Business Interiors 803.80 Minor Furniture&Fixtures 58663 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 198.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58664 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 3,043.94 Repair&Maintenance Services 58665 Medlin Controls Co. 190.40 Instrument Supplies 58666 Milltronics,Inc. 957.37 Electrical Supplies 58667 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 84.91 Janitorial Supplies 58668 Mission Uniform Service 1,531.33 Uniform Rentals 58669 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyworks 374.04 Auto Painting Services-Trailer 903 H:ldeptUnIEXCEL.dta12201APSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-031Claims Paid Report-123103.rds EXHIBIT B fin/210Ac Page 10 of 13 1r19120071 r. + Claims Paid From 12/16/03 to 12131/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58670 MARMAC Field Services,Inc. 6,184.00 Professional Services P1-92 58671 MDS Consulting 18,187.09 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 58672 National Fire Protection Association 135.00 Membership 58673 Neal Supply Co. 1,231.47 Plumbing Supplies 58674 NetVersant of Southern California 2,198.10 Security System Access Control Cards-Blank Stock 58675 City of Newport Beach 72.97 Water Use 58676 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,229.81 Machine Oil 58677 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 16,886.54 Professional Services-Materials Testing,Inspection&Geotechnical Engrg. 58678 The Norco Companies 170.78 Mail Delivery Service 58679 Norms Refrigeration 118.18 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58680 NASSCO/PACP 2,250.00 O&M Training Registration 58681 O'Connor Sales,Inc. 1773.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58682 Office Depot Business Services Div. 476.97 Office Supplies 58683 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,656.60 Janitorial Supplies 58684 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 156.84 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58685 Orange County Hose Company 30.70 Hydraulic Hose Supplies&Parts 58686 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.00 Quarterly Inspection,Maint.&Certification of Fire Sprinkler Systems at Plts. 1 &2 58687 Oxygen Service Company 2,725.29 Specialty Gases 58688 OCB Reprographics 242.61 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 58689 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 1,027.94 A/C Filters 58690 Pacific Parts&Controls,Inc. 1,142.14 Electrical Supplies 58691 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 164.03 Tires 58692 PenValve 1,407,50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58693 Port Supply 263.33 Safety Supplies 58694 Power Design 2,343.56 Electrical Supplies 58695 Power Electro Supply Co.,Inc. 59.77 Electrical Supplies 58696 PCG Industries 1,150.00 Repair&Maintenance Services 58697 PCS Express,Inc. 200.50 Courier Service 58698 PRSA-Orange County Chapter 155.00 Membership-Public Relations Society of America 58699 PVF Sales,Inc. 314.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58700 R W Beck 3,497.80 Professional Services P1-90 58701 Ramsay Corporation 698.00 Office Supplies 58702 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,929.56 Employee Life Ins.Premium,Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ins.Payroll Deductions 58703 Royale Cleaners 38.00 Uniform Cleaning Services 58704 RPM Electric Motors 279.48 Motor 58705 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 278.30 Paint Supplies 58706 S.P.Kinney Engineers,Inc. 217.19 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58707 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 3,045.00 Construction-Pump Out(3)Air Jumper Lines 58708 Schwing America,Inc. 153.78 Pump Supplies 58709 Scottel Voice&Data, Inc. 2,284.80 Telephone System Maintenance 58710 Seton Name Plate Corp 332.57 Safety Signs 58711 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 2,269.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58712 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 3,121.94 Name Plates&Holders 58713 Skalar,Inc. 801.98 Lab Parts&Supplies 58714 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc. 458.48 Plumbing Supplies 58715 Snap-On Tools,Inc. 625.93 Tools 58716 Southern California Edison 1,752.86 Power 58717 Sparkletts 1,493.19 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals H:\deptVin\EXCELdta\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report102-031CI8ims Paid Report-123103.)ds EXHIBIT B ttn/210nc Page 11 of 13 1/19/2004 Claims Paid From 12/16103 to 12/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58718 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 579.36 Printing-Forms 58719 Summit Steel 52.56 Metal 58720 Sunset Industrial Parts 226.71 Mechanical Supplies 58721 Synagro Technologies, Inc. 595.00 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 58722 SPEC Services, Inc. 18.847.66 Engineering Services J-33-1 58723 SPX Valves&Controls 1.151.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 58724 Terminix International 3,030.00 Pest Control 58725 Thermo Environmental Instruments 365.12 Rechargeable Battery 58726 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 451.66 Mechanical Supplies 58727 Times Community News 143.75 Notices&Ads 58728 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 127.42 Locks&Keys 58729 Townsend Public Affairs 5,000.00 Legislative&Executive Advocate for Grant Funding 58730 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 9,771.91 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 58731 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 102.08 Automotive Supplies 58732 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 100.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 58733 TCH Associates,Inc. 2,036.77 Lab Supplies 58734 Teksystems 21,862.00 Temporary Employment Services 58735 U.S.Composting Council 250.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 58736 U.S. Peroxide, L.L.C. 20,241.28 Hydrogen Peroxide 58737 Ultra Scientific 944.99 Lab Supplies 58738 United Parcel Service 1,150.12 Parcel Services 58739 UC Regents 360.00 Compliance Training Registration 58740 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 312.65 Filters 58741 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 9,268.00 Temporary Employment Service 58742 Varian,Inc. 2,500.00 Lab Training Registration 58743 Verizon California 177.29 Telephone Services 58744 Verne's Plumbing 105.00 Service Contract-Testing&Cert.Backflow Devices at Plts. 1 &2&Pump Sta. 58745 Vibratronics,Inc. 7,262.78 Multifunctional Ultrasonic Detector Kit 58746 Village Nurseries 59.25 Landscaping Supplies 58747 VWR Scientific Products 1,856.81 Lab Supplies 58748 The Wackenhut Corporation 12,869.64 Security Guards 58749 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 924.60 Safety Supplies&Tools 58750 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 499.28 Electrical Parts&Supplies 58751 WEF-Registration Dept. 475.00 Planning Meeting Registration 58752 WEF 177.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 58753 WS Atkins Water 5,500.00 Professional Services SP-90 58754 Xerox Corporation 12,137.00 Fax&Copier Leases 58755 Yokogawa Corporation of America 195.54 Instrument Supplies 58756 Jose C.Ambriz 51.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58757 Marc A.Brown 215.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58758 George A.Charette 107.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58759 Chloe D.Dao 150.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58760 Carla D. Dillon 150.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58761 Michele Farmer 435.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58762 Victor R. Hermelin 41.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58763 Thomas A Hunt 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58764 Karen L.Jackson 165.28 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58765 Antonino Pira 1,806.69 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement H:ldepflfin\EXCEL.dta1220XAPSHARE1Claims Paid Report102-031Claims Paid Report-123103.)ds EXHIBIT B Hnv210Pc Page 12 of 13 1/19120M Claims Paid From 12116/03 to 12131103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 58766 Patrick A.Sullivan 170.00 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 58767 James G.Tintle 51.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 58768 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 518.00 Underground Storage Tank,Hazardous Material,&State Fees 58769 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fee 58770 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fee 58771 Orange County Sanitation District 938.79 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 13,359,483.58 Payroll Disbursements 32604-32698 Employee Paychecks $ 164,735.27 Biweekly Payroll 12/23/03 32699-32702 Employee Paychecks $ 2,900.24 Payroll Correction&Adjustment, Reissue Stale Dated Check,&Termination 93056-93564 Direct Deposit Statements 1,005,346.80 Biweekly Payroll 12/23/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,172,982.31 Wire Transfer Payments U.S.Bank $ 85,466.02 December Interest Payment on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 85,466.02 Total Claims Paid 12/16103-12/31103 $ 14,617,931.91 H:ldeprifin%EXCELdta1220WPSHARE1CIaims Paid RepoAti02-031Gaims Paid Report-123103.)ds EXHIBIT B f[n1210Ac Page 13 of 13 1119/2004 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. I/28/04 ~ AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake Anderson, General Manager Originator: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: APPOINTING A SECRETARY PRO TEM TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN BOARD SECRETARY'S ABSENCE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-01, Appointing a Secretary Pro Tern to the Board of Directors; and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 03-01. SUMMARY In order to fulfill the complex administrative, technical and programmatic duties related to the Board Secretary's Office in her absence, it is necessary to appoint a Secretary Pro Tern to exercise such responsibilities during these periods of time. It is recommended that the Secretary to the General Manager be empowered with said Pro Tem duties and responsibilities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/a PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Resolution No. OCSD 03-01 , approved at the January 22, 2003 Board meeting. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. x Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See attached resolution. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives suggested. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. OCSD 04-01 H:\depttagenda\Board Agenda Repons12004 Board Agenda Reports10104Utem 9(a).Secretary pro tem.doc Revised: 8/10/98 Page 1 t� / RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 04-01 APPOINTING A SECRETARY PRO TEM TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT APPOINTING A SECRETARY PRO TEM TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 03-01 WHEREAS, the Office of the Secretary to the Board of Directors performs a wide variety of responsible, confidential, and complex administrative, technical, and programmatic duties for and on behalf of the District's Board of Directors and Management Staff, in accordance with established District policies and procedures, and applicable State laws; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary that in order to fulfill the duties of the Office in the absence of the Board Secretary, a Secretary Pro Tern be appointed to exercise the duties of the Board Secretary. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That individual holding the position of Secretary to the General Manager is hereby appointed as Secretary Pro Tern of the Board of Directors. Section 2: That in the absence of the Board Secretary, the Secretary Pro Tern to the Board of Directors shall have the powers and authority to exercise the duties of the Board Secretary. Section 3: That Resolution No. OCSD 03-01 is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held January 28, 2004. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary Kldept\agendalBoard Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Repons10104\11em 9(a).Secretary pro tem.doc Revised:8/10/98 Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To 13d.of Dir. 1/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9b Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-38 — DITTBERNER ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition from Richard Dittberner requesting annexation of 0.55 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Via Vista and Cooks Corner in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-02, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-38 — Dittberner Annexation). SUMMARY • OCSD received a request from Richard Dittberner to annex 0.55 acres to OCSD. This parcel will be connected to an existing City of Anaheim sewer on Mohler Drive. • This parcel is annexed to the City of Anaheim. The property has an existing three bedroom house with a existing septic system that will be removed after annexation to OCSD and connect to the City of Anaheim sewer. • The City of Anaheim will collect the sewer inspection and sewer capacity fees for this property. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties. The Board of Directors approved this action and it became effective March 14, 1989. Under this Tax Exchange, OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of $5,901 includes the following: LAFCO Processing Fee $ 1 ,150 OCSD Processing Fee 500 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee 350 CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee 43 OCSD Annexation Acreage Fee 3 858 TOTAL ANNEXATION FEE $ 5,901 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption will be filed. ATTACHMENTS 1 . Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map RLC:sa H:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\DittbernerAnnexation.doc Revised' BMW Page 2 A EXHIBIT"A" OCSD-38 Dittberner Annexation No.DA-03-26 to the Orange County Sanitation District 1 That portion of land situated in the City of Anaheim,County of Orange,State of California,being all 2 of Parcel 2,and a portion of Private Roadway (Via Vista),40.00 feet wide,as shown on a Map filed in 3 Book 84,page 41 of Records of Survey in the office of the County Recorder of said County,more 4 particularly described as follows: 5 Beginning at an angle point in the existing boundary of the Orange County Sanitation District 6 (OCSD),as established by"Annexation No. 11"to Orange County Sanitation District No.2,said angle 7 point being the most easterly corner of said annexation and the easterly terminus of that certain course 8 shown as"N86°20'35"E 502.41"'in said annexation,said angle point being also a point on the 9 southwesterly boundary line of said Parcel 2,from which a tie to said point bears South 68°29'24"East 10 1934.90 feet from Orange County Horizontal Control Station GPS No.3259,having a coordinate value 11 (U.S. Survey foot)of North 2257988.315 and East 6101910.211,based upon the California Coordinate 12 System(CCS 83),Zone VI, 1983 NAD( 1991.35 epoch OCS GPS Adjustment)as said GPS No.3259 is 13 shown on Tract 15927 filed in Book 812,pages 3 through 8,inclusive,of Miscellaneous Maps of said 14 County, said point being the Point of Beginning. 15 Thence,along the existing boundary line of OCSD per said annexation and the southwesterly 16 boundary line of said Parcel 2 the following two courses;North 36°34'54"West, 114.49 feet; 17 Thence,North 37'15'54"West,69.10 feet to the most westerly corner of said Parcel 2; 18 Thence,leaving said existing boundary line of OCSD and continuing along the northwesterly line of 19 Parcel 2,North 50024'06"East, 90.81 feet to the most northerly corner of said Parcel 2,said point also 20 being an angle point on the existing boundary of the OCSD,as established by "Annexation No. 61"to the 21 County Sanitation District No. 2; 22 Thence,along the existing boundary line of OCSD per said"Annexation No. 61",along the 23 northeasterly line of Parcel 2 and its southeasterly prolongation, South 39035'54"East,222.07 feet to the 24 most southerly corner of"Annexation No.61",said point also being a point on the centerline of Via 25 Vista,40.00 feet wide,as shown on said"Annexation No.61"; 26 27 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT"A" OCSD-38 Dittberner Annexation No.DA-03-26 to the Orange County Sanitation District 1 Thence,leaving said existing boundary line of OCSD and continuing along said centerline of Via 2 Vista South 42°12'56"West,93.33 feet to the intersection with a line parallel with the southwesterly 3 boundary line shown on a map filed in Book 67,Page 19 of Records of Survey in said office of the 4 County Recorder and distant 10.00 feet northeasterly therefrom,measured at right angle from said 5 southwesterly line; 6 Thence,along said parallel line the following courses; 7 South 36°34'54"East,2.28 feet; 8 Thence,South 33°17'24"East, 132.38 feet; 9 Thence South 43°30'54"East, 36.21 feet to a point on the existing boundary line of OCSD as to created by"Annexation No. 17"to County Sanitation District No. 2.,said point being distant North 11 50024'06"East, 10.02 feet from the most westerly corner of"Annexation No. 17"; 12 Thence,leaving said parallel line, along existing OCSD boundary line, South 50°24'06"West, 13 10.02' to the most westerly corner of"Annexation No. 17"; 14 Thence,leaving the existing OCSD boundary line,along said southwesterly line of said Record of 15 Survey the following courses; 16 North 43°30'54"West, 36.42 feet; 17 Thence,North 33°17'24"West, 133.00 feet; 18 Thence,North 36°34'54"West,53.51 feet to the Point of Beginning. 19 20 21 Unless otherwise noted, all distances are ground and are based upon the California Coordinate System 22 (CCS 83),Zone VI, 1983 NAD(1991.35 EPOCH OCS GPS Adjustment).To obtain grid distances, 23 multiply the ground distances by 0.99997881. 24 25 The above-described parcel of land contains 0.55 acres,more or less. 26 27 Page 2 of 3 r EXHIBIT"A" w OCSD-38 Dittberner Annexation No. DA-03-26 to the Orange County Sanitation District 1 2 All as shown on Exhibit"B"attached hereto and by this reference,made a part thereof. 3 4 This document was prepared by me or 5 6 under my direction and supervision. �c��tAN&9 PO 7 ��J 17(P.Og130/04 Dated this�Jr/ySay of , 2004 8 qp No.WW 9 .9�OF CAUFOQ, 10 Robert Jelin L.S.6803 My license expires 9-30-04 11 12 13 14 This document does meet the approval of 15 the Orange County Surveyor's Office p 16 John Canas,County Surveyor 17 e � Dated thi/,9day of -_3,2004 EXp.09/30/04 18 No.6803 19 Per: Robert iffinek,Deputy County Surveyor �TFOF CAS-CFO 20 L.S. 6803,My license expires 9-30-04 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT "B., SHEET I OF I OCSO-38 DITTBERNER ANNEXATION No. DA 03-26 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MOST N'LY CDR L 2, 4/41. `00, \ T 'fs SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT p'SV"' � ! 1 `� THIS PROPOSAL WAS PREPARED BY ME OR CITY �' � x ,L$� �.y�9, 2 ROBERT J IN£K. L.S. 6803 OO O 0, �S. ..ANNEXATION No.61 p. , MY LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2004 /% �y 9 S TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Na Z r F MOST W'LY COR l 2.RS8 4/4}. II N 2257988.315 Z 0 1"), Fpd'.1i>C. Ja d � / ' �EXP.09/30 o E 6101910.211 J 0 E ��O, /•, /04 9 "ANNEXATION No 11" 110, \• (TENTATIVE TRACT No 87131 �` �.�,f P'B 00 / :� % \ N�9 NO.6803 �\Q �r,l 11'.,e...r. 'O TO ORANGE COUNT Nos 2NITATIDN DISTRICT � 8 �^� /, y � OF CA 0) S6812 SW'LY LME PCL 2 /� S� �P7 ,e � r1NAliEIIVI 70 24,. J I ��934,9 ���. -,i COUNTY SURVEYORS STATEMENT ITn y / THIS PROPOSAL DOES MEET THE APROVAL OF THE l ORANGE CDUNTY�S,1¢VEYORS OFf�.CHI p T7f1'�� vF p, 20, \ DATED THIS �?H- OAY OF C/�f H 2004. ), jy �O• / MOST S'LY COR JOHN CANAS. COUNTY SURVEYQ ` �p> ,�P / 'ANN XA ION No. Y' (NB6"20'35"E 502.411 y�A3y BY: ROBERT JeLINEK. DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR POg AN L.S. 6803. MY LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/2004 ti MOST Ely COR 6b P.' ._I, "ANNEXATION No.11" 50' 0' 25, S0' 53.51, S362 285a E y`�p Doti Y,}0 GRAPHIC SCALE vr=peJ' 9 NOTES: 2`�, G `�v, t;o68o 2 A.P.N. 356-141-14 lc� \��!f *STA�•OfCAV�OQ THIS PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS r 9 S4336215a•'E � ti 0.55 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. L� GE END O0 ��� 1 RECORD PER ADJOINING ANNEXATION SW'LY LINES p,� ANNEXATION BOUNDARY R.S.B.67/19. �� //� "ANNEXATION No 17" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL DISTANCES ON THIS MAP ARE ^ TO COUNTY SANITATION EXISTING ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION GROUND AND ARE BASED UPON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE < OtSTRICTNo 2 `����� SYSTEM ICCS831, ZONE VI. 1983 NAO (1991.35 EPOCH CCS 3'30'S4^W DISTRICT (O.C.S.O.) BOUNDARY. N4 GPS ADJUSTMENT). 36.0'5 TO OBTAIN GRID DISTANCE. MULTIPLY GROUND DISTANCE S50124'06"W BY 0.99997881. N THE OFFICE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR. INDICATES OCS HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION AS FILED 10.02' - MOST W'LY COR •I I "ANNEXATION No.17" BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 1/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9c Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RESOURCES DEPARTMENT TO RELOCATE OCSD SEWER FACILITIES FOR THE SKYLINE DRIVE STORM DRAIN PHASE I PROJECT FROM REDHILL AVENUE TO SKYWAY DRIVE. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a reimbursement agreement with the Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department (PFRD) for the relocation of Orange County Sanitation District's sewer facilities in Skyline Drive for an estimated amount not to exceed $231,602, as required by PFRD's Master Plan Storm Drain Program, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • The Orange County PFRD is constructing several storm drain and road improvement projects throughout the County of Orange, and has agreed to relocate Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) sewer, manholes and house lateral in their construction contracts. • OCSD sewers have been constructed in County roadways under PFRD encroachment permits. The permit conditions require that OCSD must relocate our sewer facilities if there is a conflict with future storm drain projects. • PFRD has estimated the cost to relocate OCSD sewer facilities to be a maximum of $231,602, which includes 15% for PFRD administration costs. This work will be done as a separate bid item in PFRD's storm drain contract, and the final cost will be billed directly to OCSD after the contract is complete. OCSD will inspect the work to ensure the work is done correctly. • OCSD will approve any field change orders before any additional work is started. Any additional work done by PFRD's Contractor will be added to the final invoice to OCSD per the Agreement. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This work will be charged to the Revenue Area budget in an estimated amount of $231 ,602. BUDGET IMPACT NX This item has been budgeted. (Line item-Revenue Area Budget) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This item will be paid from the District's Revenue Area budgets. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES OCSD could put this job out to bid, but the work would have to be completed before PFRD bid the job. At this point, OCSD could not get the work completed in time, which would delay the PFRD storm drain project. OCSD staff believes that it is more efficient and cost-effective to include all of this work in the PFRD's storm drain contract. CEQA FINDINGS PFRD will be responsible for CEQA compliance. ATTACHMENTS None RLC:sa H:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\Reimbursement County of Orange.doc Rehsed: 8I20101 Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 01/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9d Orange County Sanitation District FROM;: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Adam Nazaroff, Associate Engineer III SUBJECT: LONG TERM FLOW MONITORING PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with ADS Environmental Services for Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, waiving the requirement for Errors and Omissions insurance with no change to the total contract amount not to exceed $6,337,400. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) initiated a comprehensive program to reduce wet weather flows caused by rain dependent infiltration and inflow (I&I) as part of the implementation of 1999 Strategic Plan. One of the key elements of this program was the Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2. • The Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, consists of locating flow meters throughout OCSD's service area to continuously monitor flows for five years to identify and prioritize locations in the District's service area for projects to reduce I&I. • The current Professional Services Agreement (PSA) requires that ADS Environmental Services carry Errors and Omissions insurance from a California admitted insurer. Errors and Omissions insurance generally protects OCSD from design errors that may occur for capital projects. The types of services that ADS is performing under the current contract are not related to design and construction that is typically covered under Errors and Omissions insurance. • ADS's insurance carrier, Lloyd's of London, is no longer a California admitted insurer. Since Errors and Omissions insurance is not necessary for this project, Staff recommends eliminating the District's requirement for Errors and Omissions insurance for this PSA PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Amendment No 1 on November 6, 2001, for additional data collection and conversion of the mapping database to Geographic Information System format at a cost of $25,000. Revised: 06104103 Page 1 Amendment No. 2 on November 19, 2003, for additional flow meter relocations and data analysis at a cost of S125,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This amendment will not change the contract amount. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable (information item) This Amendment does not change the contract total dollar amount. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the amendment. Not approving the amendment will require ADS to obtain Errors and Omission insurance or they will be in default of the current contract. ADS has indicated that Errors and Omissions insurance costs would pose an unreasonable financial burden on their overhead costs. CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt. ATTACHMENTS PSA Status Report AN:sa H:\ntglobaMgenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\J-73-2_PSA Ammendmant for E and O Omissions.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Long Term Flow Monitoring Program Job No. J-73-2 Total Project Budget: $7,074,400 Consultant: ADS Environmental, Inc. Start Date of Project: October 26, 2000 Date Amendment Description Cost AccumulatedCosts Long Term Flow Monitoring Program including identification of monitoring sites; installation of 10/25/00 Original PSA flow monitors; and flow data collection and $6,187,400 $ 6,187,400 maintenance of flow meters for a period of 5 years *Amendment Additional data collection and conversion of 11/06/01 No. 1 mapping database (GIS format). $25,000 $6,212,400 11/17/03 Amendment No. Additional flow meter relocations and data $125,000 $6,337,400 2 analysis Proposed Amendment No. Waive Requirement for E&O insurance. N/A $6,337,400 *General Manager Approval AN:sa EDMS 003761669 Revised 091703 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, December 17, 2003 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Steve Anderson, Chair pro tem, Vice Chair Mike Moore Jim Ferryman, Chairman, OMTS Committee Chris Townsend Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Directors Absent: Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Shirley McCracken, Chair Carol Beekman, Communications Services Brian Donahue, Chairman, PDC Committee Manager Jim Silva, County Supervisor Jim Colston, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs Liaison Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Vice Chair Steve Anderson was appointed Chair pro tem. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the November 19, 2003 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair announced that registrations for CASA and the Orange County Leadership Symposium are due to Jean Tappan this week. Director Brian Brady asked for staff assistance in reviewing the task force's draft and recommending options for changes to the Approval and Compensation for Directors' Meeting Attendance policy. , Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 Q� December 17, 2003 (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. Legislative Update General Manager Blake Anderson asked Chris Townsend to update the directors on the California Senate Committee on Local Government hearing he attended in November that concerned special districts. He stated that the Sanitation District is a good agency but he wanted to provide information on the goings-on in Sacramento. Among things that were discussed were 1) what is a meeting? 2) putting caps on the number of meetings and 3) limits on stipend amounts. Mr. Townsend stated that he will continue to monitor this issue and will keep the agency informed. He suggested that the District continue to use CASA as an avenue and provide proactive participation through them. A discussion followed on backfilling the monies lost as a result of the reduction in vehicle license fees. Mr. Anderson reported that$1 million has been earmarked in the House VA-HUD- Independent Agencies budget for our secondary treatment expansion. He thanked Congressman Cox and Directors Ridgeway and Silva for their efforts on our behalf. Last week, Mr. Anderson met with Senator Diane Feinstein to go over several issues and discussed the ear marked funds. He told her that we would be requesting $50 million over the next decade representing less than a 20%federal share. Senator Feinstein said that she would provide support in the future. Carol Beekman and Mr. Anderson attended the a CASA legislative committee meeting in Sacramento December 5 and they submitted three separate white papers on state-wide standards for water reclamation, state-wide biosolids and urban runoff funding. Meetings will be scheduled with the Jarvis group on including urban runoff in the Proposition 218 exemptions. B. Orange County Leadership Symposium, January 9-11, Lake Arrowhead Mr. Anderson urged the directors to attend this event, which is intended to provide the electeds tools to improve dialogue on city and county issues. C. Draft NWRI Report regarding Asset Management Mr. Anderson stated that the NW RI-sponsored asset management review panel has submitted its findings. Staff is suggesting that two members of the panel present the findings to the Board in February. A summary report will be presented to the Steering Committee in January. Staff also suggests that the report be presented to all of the working committees because of the wide financial, planning, engineering and operational implications that asset management implies. Mr. Anderson suggested that the OMTS Committee be designated as the committee of jurisdiction. He then summarized the findings for the directors. D. Universal Power Industries Corporation Proposal Mr. Anderson and General Counsel Woodruff discussed an unsolicited proposal on an energy alternative. While many of the terms sound very attractive, there are still questions that need to be answered before making any commitment. It was generally agreed that the legal, financial and technical issues were too difficult to overcome and that the proposal should not Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 December 17, 2003 be explored further. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas Woodruff announced that the Court of Appeals has affirmed the trial court's decision regarding Crow Winthrop. The Appellate Court issued a ruling that the District's Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Ordinance is not subject to Proposition 218 and therefore the fees imposed on Crow Winthrop were not invalidly charged. Appellate costs are to be paid by Crow Winthrop. Mr. Woodruff announced that there was a need to add an additional closed session item to the agenda which surfaced subsequent to the posting of the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED to add an item of existing litigation to the closed session agenda. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-B) A. Update on the Renewal of the NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit Jim Colston updated the committee on where we are with the permit renewal. The operational plan update has been presented to the Regional Board, as well as a description of the disinfection facilities and how that system will continue to operate. Meetings continue on other aspects of the permit. Mr. Colston then outlined the scheduled. It is expected that a draft permit will be received in January or early February. There will then be 45 days for public comments. A workshop is anticipated in April or May and it will be held locally. Adoption should take place in July and after the permit is adopted discussions on the consent decree process begins. No significant changes are anticipated in the ocean monitoring program. The Communications Services Division is assisting with the public education process. A discussion followed on the definition of `blending processes' and 30/30 secondary treatment standards. B. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. There were no questions or clarifications required. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of the Steering Committee f Page 4 (; December 17, 2003 (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:16 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Sections 54956.9(a) and(b), to discuss two items. Item 12 A.2. was deleted from the agenda. Item 13.A.3. was added per the motion adopted under Item 7 above. The matter is existing litigation, WOODSIDE V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, et al. There were no reportable actions taken by the Committee. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:57 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. ubmitted by: Tappan Bring Committee Secretary H.1gpp 1agenda1Steennp CommilteeWIDEC1121703 SC Minutes.doc l MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE RE URBAN RUNOFF MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, May 21, 2003 A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, May 21, 2003 at 3 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don Bankhead, Ad Hoc Committee Chair Don McIntyre, Consultant Patty Campbell, Director Chip Monaco, OCPFRD Debbie Cook, Director Richard Boone, OCPFRD Norm Eckenrode, Director George Edwards, OCPFRD Beth Krom, Director Randy Fuhrman Roy Moore, Director Gerhardt Van Drie Tod Ridgeway, Director Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Directors Absent: Jim Silva, Director/Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Carol Beekman, Communications Manager Tom Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Adriana Renescu, Source Control Supervisor Jim Colston, Senior Regulatory Specialist Penny Kyle, Board Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM This was not required. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the May 7, 2003 meeting were ordered to be received and filed. Directors Anderson, Eckenrode and Ridgeway abstained. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Page 2 May 21, 2003 ' (5) REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Don Bankhead did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not in attendance. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS A. The Orange County storm water management program is defined within a policy and regulatory framework established by the Orange County Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit and Drainage Area Management Plan currently managed by OCPFRD. The purpose of this meeting is to gain a better understanding of that policy framework as a foundation for considering the future direction of the District's Urban Runoff program. Dr. Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, led a discussion with presentations by Adriana Renescu (OCSD) on the source of urban runoff discharges, and Chip Monaco (OCPFRD) on overview of the regulatory context surrounding urban runoff issues. The Committee members discussed various items to include diversion methods, funding costs, partnering with other cities and agencies, and legal opinion on Propositions 218 issues. Staff was then directed to evaluate the cost and feasibility of diversions and OCSD treatment capability and other treatment options, such as natural treatment systems and filter devices that the District could implement, and report their findings at the meeting scheduled tentatively for July 2003. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 9, 2003 beginning at 3 p.m. Q Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Page 3 May 21, 2003 (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 4:54 p.m. Submitted by: A Penny M. yle, Board cretary RldeptWgendaM Hoe CommilfeeslUrban Runo=0031052103 AH Committee Minufes.doc �• MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE RE URBAN RUNOFF MEETING Orange County Sanitation District January 14, 2004 A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, January 14, 2004 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don Bankhead, Ad Hoc Committee Chair Don McIntyre, Consultant Patty Campbell, Director Bob Beardsley, City of Huntington Beach Norm Eckenrode, Director Dave Kiff, City of Newport Beach Cathy Green, Director Chris Crompton, County of Orange Beth Krom, Director Norris Brandt, IRWD Roy Moore, Director Larry McKenney, OCPFRD Tod Ridgeway, Director Scott Baugh, Legislative Consultant Jim Silva, Director/Supervisor Ken Theisen, RWQCB Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Sonja Wassgren Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair John Shaffer Don Schultz Directors Absent: None STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Tom Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM This was not required. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the May 21, 2003 meeting were ordered to be received and filed. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Page 2 January 14, 2004 (5) REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Don Bankhead did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported on the Third Annual Orange County Leadership Symposium that was held at Lake Arrowhead the weekend of January 9-11, 2004. Seven of our board members attended. One of the discussions dealt with determining which opportunities to pursue. The questions facing the district are similar to those facing all of the entities in Orange County. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS A. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Receive and file CA Regional Water Quality Control Board letter to County of Orange and Beach Cities dated December 23, 2003 re Notice of Violation of Order No. R8-2002-0010 (MS4 Permit)- Discharges of polluted Non-Stormwater to the Santa Ana River and the Pacific Ocean and Request for Technical and Monitoring Information Pursuant to Section 13267 of the California Water Code. Ken Theisen of the Regional Water Quality Control Board explained the reasons for issuing the Notice of Violation of Order No. R8-2002-0010 (MS4 Permit). It appears that the Santa Ana River is the main contributor to the high bacteria counts at the beach. Further investigations of the Santa Ana River will be done to try to identify the sources of pollution. Mr. Theisen also mentioned that the letter is to force the permittees to take all steps necessary to reduce urban runoff discharges into the Santa Ana River and have the permittees maintain all stormwater facilities. The County and the Corps of Engineers will be performing a study on the lower Santa Ana River. Larry McKenney stated that 90 percent of the allowable dry weather flows are proposed to be diverted to the sewers. He also said that bird and pet waste is a major problem and adds significant amounts of bacteria to the runoff. Bob Beardsley described the actions the City of Huntington Beach has taken to reduce urban runoff discharges onto Huntington Beach shorelines. It was mentioned that not all of the 30 —60 million gallons per day of urban runoff needs to be diverted. B. Discuss Urban Runoff Study—Triennial Report Findings and Recommendations. Tom Meregillano gave an information report to the committee members on the diversion program. He reported on the status of the program, the identified sources of urban runoff, quantity and quality of urban runoff and observable impacts, a preliminary financial analysis and future concerns about capacity to 1 Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Page 3 January 14, 2004 treat increased amounts of urban runoff. The report concluded that the current diverted flows have no significant impacts that would require revision to the policy. However, the 28 proposed diversions could exceed the maximum capacity of 10 mgd. There is a need to determine the ultimate capacity, long- term quality impacts to OCSD, limitations, and cost sharing. The study that staff is recommending under Agenda Item 7.C. will provide the additional information and cost estimates that the directors will consider to determine the direction of the urban runoff program. Once this information is in hand, the future of the program will have to be determined. Several funding options were identified, including a dedicated county-wide revenue source. At 5:50 Director Cathy Green!eft the meeting. The directors agreed that it is important to continue the program. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend approving a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Program Management Consultants (IPMC), a joint venture of Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. and CH2M Hill, Inc., to conduct an urban runoff study in an amount not to exceed$223,123. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The directors agreed that quarterly meetings would be appropriate. The next Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 21, 2004 beginning at 3 p.m. Future meetings are scheduled for Wednesday, July 21, 2004 at 5 p.m. and Wednesday, October 20, 2004 at 5 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Page 4 i January 14, 2004 " (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Submitted by: l J p Committ S cretary H:aTapan, endaild Hoc CommmeeslUrban RunofA2 00 410 1 14 0 4 Urban Runoff AH Committee Minutes.doc AD HOC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 1/14/04 1/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 7c 12b Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env. Director of Technical Services Originator: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager SUBJECT: Urban Runoff Sole Source Contract GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Program Management Consultants (IPMC), a joint venture of Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. and CH2M Hill, Inc., to conduct an urban runoff study in an amount not to exceed $223,123. SUMMARY The volumes of urban runoff discharge are anticipated to increase and it is imperative for the District to conduct further studies to determine its collection and treatment limitations. In order to undertake such a task, consulting services are required. Recommendation for sole sourcing is based on the following justification: • IPMC has conducted closely related studies with the Engineering Department in the P2-90 project for Secondary Treatment Alternatives and has accumulated a significant knowledge base and familiarity with the District's overall collections and treatment operations. As a result, significant time and project cost savings are anticipated. • In order to undertake and execute the urban runoff study effectively, potential vendors must have thorough knowledge of the District's collections and treatment processes that IPMC has already attained. In addition, this study requires the utilization of the findings obtained by IPMC from the P2-90 project. Awarding the contract to IPMC will avoid duplication of efforts in building the same foundation that IPMC has developed in the past. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS On May 7, 2003, the Ad Hoc Committee approved contract services for a consultant to evaluate the technical, institutional, and cost issues associated with continuing the District's Urban Runoff Program and expanding it beyond the 10 MGD cap to meet anticipated needs. $300,000 was budgeted to conduct the study. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Source Control budgeted $300,000 through the Joint Operating (JO) Budget to fund relevant studies to ensure that the practice of collecting and treating urban runoff does not compromise the District's treatment system and regulatory obligations. While $300,000 was authorized for the program, only $100,000 is appropriated this year for the work; the scope is $223,123. The remaining unencumbered JO engineering services funds will be transfer to cover the remaining cost of the study. BUDGET IMPACT This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 108) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District's Urban Runoff Policy allows the discharge of up to a maximum of 10 million gallons per day (MGD) of urban runoff into its sewer system primarily to address serious public health or water quality problems. The County of Orange expects an increase over the next several years in the number of urban runoff diversion facilities throughout Orange County. With this increase, it is anticipated that the volume may exceed the established 10 MGD flow limit. In order to gain a better understanding of the District's collections treatment capacity for urban runoff, as well as concerns in meeting its environmental compliance and water quality standards for future reclamation, it is important for the District to determine the extent to which it can accept future urban runoff diversions without impacting its ability to collect, treat, dispose, and reclaim wastewater. Staff is proposing the following scope of work to understand the District's ultimate capability to accept urban runoff: • Determination of existing and future residual capacities for both trunkline and treatment facilities. The quantity (or volume) of urban runoff that can be accepted by the District is dictated by the residual capacity, which is the capacity that is left available after meeting its basic sanitary wastewater collection and treatment requirements during dry weather. Although existing available capacities can be easily determined, the future projections of residual capacity will require more considerations. Such determination should take into account future facility expansions identified in the District's Strategic Plan among other factors. ■ Determination of the quality impact of urban runoff. The chemical quality or characteristics of urban runoff can potentially have a direct impact on the District's ability to meet compliance requirements for toxicity, effluent limits, biosolids, and most likely the reclamation and drinking water quality standards for the Ground Water Replenishment System (GWRS) project. It is necessary to identify all existing, as well as emerging pollutants of concern, to determine potential impact in meeting compliance and identify options to mitigate or resolve the problems. • Determination of future quantity of urban runoff diversions anticipated by the county and additional conveyance and treatment capacities requiring capital improvements. Page 2 This requires coordination with the County of Orange to determine the future quantity of urban runoff that need to be diverted to address the regional needs. Based on the past and current studies conducted by the County of Orange and the proposed diversion facilities in the future, any additional conveyance and treatment capacities beyond the residual capacities must be determined. The determination for additional capacities is necessary to identify the cost of capital improvements required. OCSD URBAN RUNOFF STUDY Proposed Project Milestones and Deliverables ITEM# Action Items Start Complete 1 Kick Off Meeting 02/05/04 Task 1: Residual Treatment Capacity 02/05/04 03/02/04 Briefing Meeting 02/19/04 Report 03/02/04 Review Meeting 03/09/04 2 Task 2: Residual Trunkline Capacity 03/19/04 04/22/04 Briefing Meeting 04/08/04 Report 04/22/04 Review Meeting 04/29/04 3 Task 3 Urban Runoff Characterization 04/08/04 05/05/04 Briefing Meeting 04/22/04 Report 05/05/04 Review Meeting 05/12/04 4 Task 4: List Emerging Pollutants 04/22/04 05/20/04 Briefing Meeting 05/06/04 Report 05/20/04 Review Meeting 05/27/04 5 Task 5: Future Urban Runoff Flows 05/06/04 06/30/04 Briefing Meeting 06/17/04 Report 06/30/04 Review Meeting 07/07/04 6 Task 6: Additional Needed Capacity 06/17/04 07/21/04 Briefing Meeting 07/07/04 Report 07/21/04 Review Meeting 07/28/04 7 Task 7: Final Study Report 07/28/04 09/28/04 Draft Report 08/27/04 Review Meeting 09/16/04 Final Report 09/28/04 Page 3 c Scope of Work Project costs Total Time Hour 2,042 Total Labor Cost $212,250.00 Total Expenses: $10,873.00 Copy and Report and Travel Grand Total $223,123.00 Justification of Sole Source On December 2003, the Engineering department, through the IPMC, contracted CH2MHill to conduct a study to evaluate Secondary Treatment Alternatives (P2-90). This study solely dealt with the evaluation of secondary treatment alternatives, focusing on toxicity sources and their removal efficiency in pre-selected secondary treatment units. During a period of 12 months, CH2MHill gathered an extensive data set of the District's wastewater flow and chemical constituent quality from different sources within the District, including the laboratory, operations, and source control to project and anticipate the changes in the District's future influent and effluent composition. This evaluation took into account the current and future projections of urban runoff flow volumes and relevant toxicity trends. With their extensive work on the P2-90 project, CH2MHill obtained comprehensive knowledge of the District's urban runoff flow volumes, chemical composition, toxicity trend as well as the knowledge of the relevant impacts associated with the District's collection and treatment processes, which are pertinent factors needed to undertake the urban runoff study. These circumstances place CH2MHill in a unique position to conduct the proposed scope of work. A substantial portion of the task elements in the P2-90 project build on the proposed task elements in the urban runoff study. With the County of Orange and several Coastal Cities aggressively seeking the District's services to treat urban runoff, the urgency to determine the District's ultimate capability to accept urban runoff is imperative. Findings from the study would provide the District's Board of Directors with engineering and scientifically based information that would allow them to make an informed decision whether to accept additional urban runoff flow volumes above existing 10 MGD limit. ALTERNATIVES ■ Solicit Proposals for Bid: This option requires that the District to send a request for proposals for the urban runoff study. This would add approximately six months to the project schedule due to the bidding process and establishing initial knowledge base, which needs to be gain by a non-IPMC. Page 4 i r ■ No Project: Determining the District's ultimate capacity and quality of urban runoff would not be addressed. CEQA FINDINGS NIA ATTACHMENTS ■ Scope of Work Page 5 r Scope of Work for Urban Runoff Study 1.0 SUMMARY Urban runoff quality and its direct impact to the coastline has become a major concern in Orange County. In response, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has taken a proactive role in providing its service as part of a regional solution to address urban runoff pollution. As a major watershed stakeholder, OCSD has partnered and coordinated with cities and agencies to move towards achieving long-term solutions without compromising its primary objective of safely and effectively treating sanitary wastewater. The scope of work embodied in the Urban Runoff Study will initially focus on the basic determination of OCSD's ultimate capability to receive, treat and dispose urban runoff diversions. The outcome of the study is a key factor in enabling OCSD to develop the best practical strategy in seeking a long-term solution, while using an approach that would be beneficial to the whole region. OCSD established the Urban Runoff Program in response to the resolution adopted by its Board of Directors to accept, treat, and dispose dry weather urban runoff diversions to OCSD's sewer system. The resolution allows urban runoff discharges up to a maximum of 10 million gallons per day (MGD) primarily for diversion of nuisance flows that address imminent public health or environmental problem. The County of Orange (Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department) has conducted a study that shows an expected increase in the number of proposed urban runoff diversion facilities throughout Orange County. With this increase, the volume of urban runoff discharge into the sewer system is anticipated to be magnified and may exceed the established flow limit. Because of OCSD's limited collection and treatment capacities, as well as concerns in meeting environmental compliance and water quality standards for future reclamation, it has become a priority for OCSD to determine the extent to which it can accept future urban runoff diversions without impacting its primary objectives. Professional services are required for establishing OCSD's ultimate capability to accept urban runoff which include, but not limited to, the following: 1.1 Determination of existing and future residual capacities for both trunkline and treatment facilities. The quantity (or volume) of urban runoff that can be accepted by OCSD is dictated by the residual capacity, which is the capacity that is left available after meeting its basic sanitary wastewater collection and treatment requirements during dry weather. Although existing available capacities can be easily determined, the future projections of residual capacity will require more considerations. Such determination should take into account, but not limited to, future facility expansions identified in OCSD's Strategic Plan among other factors. 1.2 Determination of the quality impact of urban runoff. The chemical quality or characteristics of urban runoff can potentially have a direct impact on OCSD's TMeregillano/SC/640 Page 1 of 11 1/7/2004 hAdept\agenda\ad hoc committees urban runoff\2004\01 1404 sole source scope of work.doc ability to meet compliance requirements for toxicity, effluent limits, biosolids, and most likely the reclamation and drinking water quality standards for the Ground Water Replenishment System (GWRS) project. It is necessary to identify all existing, as well as emerging pollutants of concern, to determine potential impact in meeting compliance and identify options to mitigate or resolve the problems. 1.3 Determination of future quantity of urban runoff diversion anticipated by the county and additional conveyance and treatment capacities requiring capital improvements. This requires coordination with the County of Orange to determine the future quantity of urban runoff that need to be diverted to address the regional needs. Based on the past and current studies conducted by the County of Orange and the proposed diversion facilities in the future, any additional conveyance and treatment capacities beyond the residual capacities must be determined. The determination for additional capacities is necessary to identify the cost of capital improvements required. 2.0 BACKGROUND AND INFORMATION To facilitate an immediate resolution to the problem of beach contamination, OCSD's Board of Directors adopted a resolution for accepting urban runoff discharges. The diversion of dry weather urban runoff to the sanitary sewer is allowed primarily to handle nuisance flows that cannot otherwise be addressed in an alternative practical or economical manner. Urban runoff diversion is to be considered the last option when selecting appropriate dry weather flow treatment. OCSD issues permits to allow discharge of urban runoff to OCSD's sewer system on a year round basis but only during dry weather periods, provided that urban runoff quality meets specific standards set by OCSD and there is adequate capacity to accommodate treatment. OCSD's primary mission is to provide efficient treatment of wastewater that complies with its National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for ocean discharge and meets quality standards that will allow future reclamation for the GWRS project and biosolids reuse. Although OCSD does not have the key responsibility for dealing with urban runoff management throughout Orange County, it has assumed a more responsive role in addressing immediate regional needs to protect public health and the environment. OCSD, however, cannot jeopardize its wastewater treatment and future reclamation operations in any way by accepting urban runoff diversions to the sewer system that will result in violation of its NPDES permit, potentially cause a sewer overflow, or negatively impact its future reclamation project. Because of this, it becomes necessary to establish OCSD's ultimate capability to accept urban runoff, in quantity and quality, to the extent that it will not compromise its primary objective, while considering alternative solutions to accommodate regional needs. The objective of this study is to determine the following: 2.1 Maximum Residual Hydraulic Capacity — Without capital improvements to increase existing capacities specifically to accommodate urban runoff, the maximum available hydraulic capacity for the collection and treatment of urban Weregillano/SC/640 Page 2 of 11 1/7/2004 hAdept\agenda\ad hoc committees\urban runoff\2004\011404 sole source scope of work.doc runoff need to be determined. This is to assess if OCSD has available capacity to accommodate the regional water quality improvement needs of the county, without taxing facility capacities primarily established for projected sanitary wastewater. In determining present and future residual hydraulic capacities, the following, at a minimum, shall be considered: • Ongoing capital improvement projects based on OCSD's Strategic Plans that would result in future capacity changes/expansion, such as upgrade to full secondary treatment. • Updated wastewater flow projections for: ■ Per capita water usage ■ Population-based flow projections ■ Water use by industrial and commercial sectors ■ Impacts of rainfall on the average daily flow rate ■ Future projections for urban development • Other components affecting future flows: ■ Addition of dairy washwater, SAWPA, and IRWD flows ■ Consideration for estimated flow reduction due to water conservation ■ Plans for diverting SARI Flow from Plant 1 to Plant 2 ■ Plans for diverting flow from the Knott and Magnolia trunks (tributary to Plant 2) to Plant 1 as a replacement to the SARI flow. This is needed to produce enough secondary effluent at Plant 1 during minimum diurnal flow conditions to meet GWRS requirements. ■ Completion of the Bushard Trunk Rehabilitation Project. When completed, it will relieve the capacity constraints experienced in the Knott/Interplant trunk system which is currently operating above its design capacity. ■ Dewatering and soil remediation projects within OCSD's jurisdiction in Orange County 2.2 Quality Impact of Urban Runoff — It is anticipated that the ocean toxicity criteria and the stringent water quality requirements of the GWRS project will dictate acceptable quality of incoming wastewater to OCSD's treatment plant, including urban runoff diversions. Establishing acceptable quality of urban runoff will ultimately require revision of OCSD's existing local limits to include numerical values for the new pollutants of concern. Since numerical limits will define acceptable water quality for all incoming flow including urban runoff, the parameters that directly impact the limits need to be considered. Because of difficulties in controlling the sources of pollutants in urban runoff, its chemical characteristics can potentially have a direct impact on OCSD's ability to meet compliance requirements for toxicity, ocean discharge standards, treatment processes, biosolids, toxicity, and most likely the water quality standards for the GWRS project. Therefore, all pollutants of concern, as well as the emerging TWeregillano/SC/640 Page 3 of 11 117/2004 hAdept\agenda\ad hoc committees\urban runoff\2004\011404 sole source scope of work.doc ones, must be identified. At a minimum, the quality impact of urban runoff must be determined by: • Characterizing the urban runoff to evaluate its chemical quality by: ■ Utilizing existing water quality data and, if needed, conducting additional sampling to identify and quantify the presence of current and emerging pollutants of concern. ■ Utilizing acceptable analytical methods in identifying and quantifying pollutants of concern using appropriate detection limits (relative to the desired levels) specific for each target constituent. • Determining the relative quality impact of each pollutant of concern on OCSD's capability to meet the following: ■ Water quality standards for recycled water (GWRS) ■ Ocean discharge toxicity ■ Biosolids quality for Class A application • Identifying solutions to mitigate or resolve problems posed by pollutant constituents with significant quality impact. This may include: ■ Alternative treatment ■ Opportunities for source control ■ Establishing action levels or numerical limits • Conducting surveys of other POTWs that operate combined sewer systems treating urban runoff and sanitary wastewater to reclamation standards for reuse will help discover all relevant experiences that can benefit OCSD. 2.3 Additional Hydraulic Capacity and Cost of Capital Improvements — Based on the regional needs of the county to divert more urban runoff to OCSD in the future, additional hydraulic capacity may be needed. This is after utilization of any residual capacity for both conveyance and treatment. Because additional capacity requires capital improvement, it is important to determine the cost required to assess if this is a viable option. 3.0 DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK 3.1 Determination of Maximum Residual Hydraulic Capacity Task 1: Establish Residual Treatment Plant Capacity Determine existing and future residual hydraulic capacity of the treatment plant that can be made available for urban runoff treatment based on the difference between treatment plant design capacity (Plants 1 and 2), designed influent Weregillano/SC/640 Page 4 of 11 1/7/2004 h:\dept\agenda\ad hoc committees\urban runoff\2004\011404 sole source scope of work.doc quality, OCSD plant operational practices, and historically observed influent quality, and plants' incoming current and future wastewater flow. Establish residual hydraulic capacity through year 2020 considering planned facility expansion/improvements and historical projection of incoming flows, among other factors deemed significant for the determination. The residual hydraulic treatment plant capacity shall be established by: ■ Drawing upon the relevant existing technical information and/ or most recent technical information being developed in OCSD's Engineering and Operations & Maintenance Departments regarding ongoing projects involving expansion of treatment capacity and modification of treatment processes to accommodate secondary treatment, GWRS, and other requirements. Target project completion dates will help determine when and how much capacity is added. ■ Evaluating the limiting flow in the treatment plant operations that dictates the maximum capacity. ■ Utilizing updated wastewater flow projections from all sources of incoming flows (excluding urban runoff) as defined in the most recent Strategic Planning Study Updates. Flow projections shall be examined to verify the validity of assumptions in comparison with anticipated changes in the future. ■ Determining and applying safety factors that reasonably take into consideration flow excursions brought about by daily fluctuations, seasonal variations or events that are expected/unexpected. Task 2: Establish Residual Trunkline Capacity Determine residual hydraulic capacity of OCSD's trunkline system that can be made available for urban runoff collection, based on the difference between trunkline design capacity, historically observed and projected future and wastewater flow. Establish individual trunkline capacity for the next fifteen years considering any planned trunkline expansion/improvements and historical projection of wastewater flows, among other factors considered significant for the determination. The residual hydraulic treatment plant capacity shall be established by: • Identifying all trunklines or those that are impacted by current and future urban runoff diversions. • Drawing upon the relevant existing technical information and/ or most recent technical information being developed in OCSD's Engineering TMeregillano/SC/640 Page 5 of 11 1/7/2004 h:\dept\agenda\ad hoc committees\urban runoff\2004\011404 sole source scope of work.doc Department regarding ongoing projects involving expansion/modification of trunklines design capacities. Target completion dates will provide information on when and how much trunkline capacity will be added. ■ Performing trunkline model simulations or other analytical methods to determine threshold limits and residual capacities. For each impacted trunkline, develop spreadsheet based hydraulic model. Compare the modeling results with results from the model used for the most recently completely Strategic Planning Study Update. It is assumed that twenty- five trunkline are impacted by current and future urban runoff diversions. ■ Utilizing updated wastewater flow projections from all sources of incoming flows (excluding urban runoff) since the residual capacity is dependent also on the incoming flow. Basic assumptions and projected data shall be examined to verify the validity of historical projections in comparison with anticipated changes in the future. ■ Determining and applying safety factors, which reasonably allows for flow excursions brought about by daily fluctuations, seasonal variations, and events that are expected/unexpected. ■ Considering other relevant factors such as impact of new stormwater regulations on sewer capacity. 3.2 Determination of Quality Impact of Urban Runoff Task 3: Conduct urban runoff characterization studies to determine urban runoff quality Urban runoff characterization consists of identifying and quantifying pollutant constituents present and their potential sources. Characterize urban runoff by: ■ Utilizing existing OCSD urban runoff water quality data to initially identify typical pollutant constituents and concentrations. ■ Identify and utilize other existing urban runoff data relevant to South Coast urban runoff pollutant concentrations. ■ Identify potential sources of pollutants constituents and establish spatial correlation between typical pollutant constituents and land use patterns including residential, commercial, industrial, roadways, and agricultural/green areas. Identify temporal factors that cause variations in urban runoff characteristics, including seasonal variations. ■ Based on the findings above, prepare a sample collection and analysis plan for urban runoff to complement existing data. The plan will include TMeregillano/SC/640 Page 6 of 11 10/2004 h:\dept\agenda\ad hoc committees\urban runoff\2004\011404 sole source scope of work.doc design of typical sampling stations, proposed location of sampling stations, protocols for sample collection, sample analysis, and detection limits for each constituent of interest. ■ Conduct a survey of at least three other agencies that are similar to OCSD in terms of location (semi-arid to and climate zone), land use pattern and degree of urbanization, combined treatment of wastewater and urban runoff that also have existing water reuse and reclamation activities. The purpose of the survey is to provide OCSD with a broad perspective and experiences gained from similar urban runoff management programs. ■ Identify factors that cause variations in urban runoff characterization and the extent of variation, including effects of seasonal changes. Task 4: Establish a list of existing and emerging pollutants of concern, an analysis of the potential quality impact for each, and possible options to mitigate or eliminate such impact Establish the pollutants of concern and analyze quality impact of each constituent on OCSD's ability to meet required standards for toxicity, recycled water, biosolids, and ocean discharge by: ■ Reviewing applicable regulations, environmental protection criteria, and pollutant effects data to determine stringent requirements regarding wastewater, reclaimed water and biosolids, which are difficult to meet. ■ Reviewing emerging pollutants of concerns with NDMA, 1,4 Dioxane, Perchlorate, Industrial Endocrine Disruptors, Hormonal Endocrine Disruptors, Pharmaceutical and Surrogates, TOC, Pesticides, etc. ■ Identifying limiting factors in OCSD's operation that are most likely to be impacted/inhibited by the presence of specific pollutants. ■ Identifying pollutants that will pass through OCSD's treatment facility because of its inability to treat due to inadequate treatment technology. ■ Evaluating characterization of urban runoff diversion and other pertinent discharges relative to OCSD's influent characteristics, to establish pollutant constituents which are likely to have direct or indirect impact on OCSD. Summarize and interpret the results to describe qualitatively how urban runoff is most likely to impact OCSD. For pollutants of concern that have significant quality impact, provide options to mitigate or eliminate impact such as: TMeregillano/SC/640 Page 7 of 11 1/7/2004 hAdept\agenda\ad hoc committees\urban runoff\2004\011404 sole source scope of work.doc ■ Determining applicable treatment technologies to bring pollutant levels down to acceptable standards. ■ Identifying source control strategies to reduce influent concentrations. ■ Developing technically based limits or action levels. ■ A combination of the above or any other effective method. 3.3 Determination of Additional Hydraulic Capacity and Cost of Capital Improvements Task 5: Determine the future volumetric flow of urban runoff diversion based on the regional needs of the county. Future volumetric flow of urban runoff diversions may be determined by: ■ Reviewing the results of the study on "Urban Runoff Dry Weather Diversion" conducted by the County of Orange to assess how OCSD can accommodate the regional needs for urban runoff diversion. ■ Consulting with the County of Orange regarding the latest information on projected urban runoff diversion flows. Identify proposed sites for future diversion facilities, start of operation, and anticipated volume of urban runoff diversion. Task 6: Determine additional hydraulic capacity to accommodate regional needs and the corresponding cost of capital improvements. The following shall be considered in determining additional hydraulic capacity and the cost of capital improvement: ■ Comparison of future volumetric flows of urban runoff diversion (based on information from the County of Orange) with the residual capacities to determine the additional capacities required. ■ In determining additional capacities, consider when proposed urban runoff diversion facilities will commence operation and the anticipated hydraulic loading and capacities of the conveyance and treatment facilities at that time. ■ Evaluate cost of capital improvement for both conveyance and treatment facilities to accommodate projected urban runoff flows. TMeregillano/SC/640 Page 8 of 11 1/7/2004 h:\dept\agenda\ad hoc committees\urban runoff\2004\011404 sole source scope of work.doc 3.4 Final Report Task 7: Submit final report for the study Summarize results of the findings and final recommendations. Provide details of the report to support findings and conclusions. Compile task reports and summary of findings and results into a final Draft Study Report and submit to OCSD for review. Incorporate mutually agreed on review comments and issue the final Study Report. 4.0 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION The project shall be implemented by dividing it into seven tasks as identified in 3.0. The following diagram shows the hierarchy of implementation and relative dependence of each task: TASK 1 TASK 2 TASK 5 TASK 3 Establish residual Establish Determine future volumetric Conduct urban treatment plant residual trunkline flow of urban runoff based runoff capacity capacity on regional needs characterization IF TASK 6 TASK 4 Determine additional Establish pollutants of hydraulic capacities concern, analysis of quality (conveyance and treatment) impact, and options to and cost of capital eliminate impact improvements 1 TASK 7 Submit Final Report TMeregillano/SC/640 Page 9 of 11 10/2004 h:\dept\agenda\ad hoc committees\urban runoff\2004\011404 We source scope of work.doc 5.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE Task Major Milestones Deadline 1 Submit report establishing residual treatment plant capacity 03/02/04 2 Submit report establishing residual trunkline capacity 04/22/04 3 Submit report for urban runoff characterization 05/05/04 4 Submit report for pollutants of concern,analysis of quality 05/20/04 impact, and options to eliminate impact 5 Submit report for future volumetric flow of urban runoff based 06/30/04 on regional needs 6 Submit report regarding additional hydraulic capacities 07/21/04 (conveyance and treatment) and cost of capital improvements 7 Submit final report summarizing results of the study and final 09/28/04 recommendation(s) *Weeks from the contract start 6.0 DELIVERABLES The consultant shall provide OCSD with the following: • Milestone reports as specified in 5.0 • Monthly Progress Reports 7.0 MONITORING OF WORK 7.1 Meetings Prior to work, meeting(s) with OCSD staff shall be held to establish appropriate contacts and review the Consultant's plan to implement this study. These meetings shall be held at OCSD's offices or as determined by OCSD. Status meetings shall be held to present the task reports to OCSD staff and to keep OCSD apprised of the work in progress. A minimum of one (1) meeting shall be held every two months at OCSD's offices (or as determined by OCSD) or may be held via conference call. The Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation of formal agendas for the meetings and for the preparation of meeting notes. The formal agenda shall be submitted with the previous meeting notes at least one week prior to each meeting. Task progress reporting meeting will be held for each of the six tasks and one for the final Study Draft Report. During the task progress reporting meetings, the TMeregillano/SC/640 Page 10 of 11 1/7/2004 h:\dept\agenda\ad hoc committeeAurban runoffl2004\011404 sole source scope of work.doc consultant will brief OCSD with task progress and will receive inputs from OCSD's stakeholders. The final Study Draft Report review meeting will be held to discuss OCSD's review comments that will be incorporated in the Final Study Report. 7.2 Progress Reports The Consultant shall submit monthly progress reports by the 10th of the month following the end of each month after award of contract. Report must include at a minimum: (1) current activities, (2) future activities, (3) potential out-of-scope items, (4) concerns, (5) solutions, and (6) strategies implemented and initiatives taken. 7.3 Right to Review Services, Facilities, and Records OCSD reserves the right to review any portion of the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement, and the Consultant agrees to cooperate to the fullest extent possible. The Consultant shall furnish to the OCSD such reports, statistical data, and other information pertaining to the Consultant's services as shall be reasonably required by OCSD. The right of OCSD to review or approve procedures, instructions, reports, test results, calculations, schedules, or other data that are developed by the Consultant shall not relieve the Consultant of any obligation set forth herein. 8.0 RESOURCES AVAILABLE OCSD will make the following resources and information available to the consultant: Access to OCSD's Engineering, Operations and Source Control staff. • Information pertinent to the study such as: operations data, engineering drawings and plans, technical reports, EPA Manuals on regulations. • Arrangement with Orange County Water District and/or Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department as an additional resource • OCSD's updated Strategic Plan 9.0 STAFF ASSISTANCE A designated OCSD staff member will be assigned to work with the Consultant on this project. All meetings with OCSD staff will be scheduled through the designated OCSD staff member. TMeregillano/SC/640 Page 11 of 11 1/7/2004 h:\dept\agenda\ad hoc committees\urban runoff\2004\011404 sole source scope of work.doc OCSD-URBAN RUNOFF STUDY Project Cost Estimates-Hours and Expenses,Only Task Labor Expenses,S Resources Time Cost Lodg Copy $hour Total Transp and and Total Total No. Task Title Name Role h (1) Labor,$ Ort Meals Repro Expenses $ �"n:}'s'7i ES�5p1`L��Le3�iii;ai>�e�tirie'.r��F!_ �•x..�:��?S,';'�Z�'��' •�'r��2in�' ,.�.N,��?:i.T. _cam C•�?.5�.:�fi3 �i,� ` :?7�?7t. .'�= •:, 1.1 Identify planned treatment plant improvements A.Wistrom IPE 16 0 25 25 25 and implementation schedules Z.Erdal JE 24 0 25 25 25 1.2 Estimate (by modeling OCSD operational A.Wistrom PE 8 0 0 0 criteria) maximum hydraulic treatment capacity Z.Erdal E 32 0 O 0 1.3 Estimate flow projections through 2020 A.Wistrom PE 4 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 16 0 O 0 1.4 Estimate safety and peaking factors S.Nedic PM 4 0 O 0 A.Wistrom PE 4 0 O 0 Z.Erdal E 1 16 0 1 O 0 1.5 TM 1 A.Wistrom PE 16 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 32 0 0 0 S.Nedic Phi 8 0 O 0 S.Hanson Edit 6 0 0 0 WP Format 8 0 0 0 Repro Prod 4 0 468 468 468 TOTAL-TASK 1 19�. 0 i=: >SR.,: 0 .::.r468.r ' -;518 z;. 518 cloazi «la 2.1 Identify impacted trunklines Z.Erdal E 16 0 50 50 50 A.Wistrom PE 2 0 50 50 50 2.2 Describe each site diversion(total of 23) Z.Erdal E 32 0 0 0 I.Feghaly E 32 0 0 0 A.Wistrom PE 1 16 0 0 0 2.3 Planned trunkline improvements and Z.Erdal E 16 0 0 0 implementation schedules(25 trunkline) I.Feghaly E 24 0 0 0 A.Wistrom PE 8 0 0 0 2.4 Trunkline modeling(25 trunkline spreadsheet moc Z.Erdal E 125 0 0 0 A.Wistrom PE 75 0 0 0 I.Feghaly E 100 0 0 0 2.5 Trunkline flow projections Z.Erdal E 8 0 0 0 A.Wistrom PE 4 0 0 0 I.Feghaly E 32 0 0 0 2.6 Estimate and apply safety and peaking factors Z.Erdal E 8 0 0 0 A.Wistrom PE 2 0 0 0 2.7 Estimate impacts of new stormwater regulation Z.Erdal E 8 0 0 0 A.Wistrom PE 2 0 0 0 2.8 TM 2 A.Wistrom PE 16 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 32 0 0 0 S.Nedic PM 8 0 0 0 S.Hanson F& 6 0 0 0 W P Format 8 0 0 0 Repro Prod. 4 0 668 668 668 TOTALTASK2 584 0 100 0 668 768 768 iI3' t FE—MOSEVOL5 I i 13_ .4 ),DW off Ma-2ift Wu =Y k se 3.1 Utilizing existing OCSD urban runoff data identify Z.Erdal E 6 0 25 25 25 typical pollutant constituents and concentrations A.Wistrom PE 2 0 25 25 25 32 Identify and utilize other existing data relevant to A.Wistrom PE 32 0 0 0 South Coast urban runoff pollutant concentrations Z.Erdal E 8 0 0 0 3.3 Establish spatial correlation between typical A.Wistrom E 24 0 0 0 pollutant constituents and land use Z.Erdal E 56 0 0 0 3.4 Develop a sample collection and analysis plan to A.Wistrom PE 4 0 0 0 "calibrate'the above data Z.Erdal E 16 0 0 0 3.5 Conduct survey of three agencies A.Wistrom PE 8 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 16 0 0 D I.FeghalyE 24 0 0 0 3.6 TM 3 A.Wistrom PE 40 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 16 0 0 0 S.Nedic Pfd 8 0 0 0 S.Hanson Edit 6 0 0 0 WP Format 8 0 0 0 Repro Prod. 4 0 1 8181 818 818 TOTAL TASK 3 278 01 50 0, 818 868 868 .�._..Existing•arid Efnefgi0 'P,Qlliitarits;. `"L':Etdal, ;'t;' .. ::; I,'> .'ti' r .. :,':-. ;,. '�.;I -.a: •::.fir ,c..rrw ...;,i 0 Z.Erdal E 0 .1 Review applicable regulation A.Wistrom PE o 0 0 1G 0 0 I.Feghaly E 16 0 0 0 4.2 Evaluate emerging contaminants Z.Erdal E 8 0 0 0 A.Wistrom PE 2 0 0 0 4.3 Identify treatment operations limiting factors that A.Wistrom PE 2 0 0 0 will be impacted S.Nedic PM 6 0 0 0 4.4 Identify pollutants that will not be removed by A.Wistrom PE 2 0 i 0 0 Treatment S.Nedic PM 6 0 0 0 4.5 Identify pollutants that will have impact on OCSD A.Wistrom PE 2 0 0 0 treatment processes S.Nedic PM 2 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 8 0 0 4.6 TM 4 A.Wistrom PE 4 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 24 0 0 0 S.Nedic PM 4 0 0 0 S.Hanson Edit 2 0 0 0 WP Format 4 0 0 0 Repro Prod 2 0 468 468 468 0 200 200 200 TOTAL'TA$K4 .. =0 0 0 668';.' ",';668 s, ',:4',';668 M5 REr"neladt► i1�Re`gs2_ "i _.sue Alt 't7o 1M ►�?' ;. 5.1 Assess options to accommodate regional urban A.Wistrom PE 8 0 01 0 runoff flows defined in OC's"Urban Runoff... Z.Erdal E 16 0 0 0 5.2 Identify and assess future diversion sites A.Wistrom PE 8 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 24 0 0 0 5.3 TM 5 A.Wistrom PE 8 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 32 0 0 0 S.Nedic PM 4 0 0 0 S.Hanson Edit 2 0 0 0 WP Format 4 0 0 0 Repro Prod. 2 0 468 468 468 TOTAL TASK 5; _ 116 . 0 468 468 468 f Sa Ao' L ¢Eogy3 a ions:. MEN 6-1 Compare residual capacity with future flows A.Wistrom PE 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 0 0 0 6.2 Compare dynamics of OC projected diversion A.Wistrom PE 0 0 0 flow with conveyance and treatment capacities Z.Erdal E 0 0 0 6.3 Estimate and evaluate capital and O&M costs of A.Wistrom PE 8 0 0 0 urban runoff conveyance and treatment S.Nedic PM 24 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 40 0 0 0 I.Feqhaly E 401 0 0 0 6.3 TM 6 A.Wistrom PE 4 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 40 0 0 0 S.Nedic PM 16 0 0 0 S.Hanson Edit 8 0 0 0 A.Vollmar Graph 16 0 0 0 WP Format 8 0 0 0 Repro Prod 3 0 468 468 468 TOTALTASK6 .207 0 ..: 0 468{ 468 468 1CT-. 7.1 Draft Report A.Wistrom PE 24 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 40 0 0 0 F.Soroushiz OC 8 0 0 0 S.Hanson Edit 6 0 0 0 A.Vollmar Graph 40 0 0 0 WP Format 8 0 0 0 Repro Prod, 4 0 2_,236 2,236 2,236 7.2 Final Report A.Wistrom PE 8 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 16 0 0 0 S.Hanson Edit 3 0 0 0 A.Vollmar Graph 32 0 0 0 WP Format 4 0 0 0 Repro Prod 4 0 2,236 2.236 2,236 TOTAL TASK 7 I 1971 1 0 0 0 4,472 4,472 4,472 ;J3 Meeifll sarid]Tlla`na ein_gnCk.,s�_ :r: �„, .:�.'rkrxs N s -rr.i.�;'-s.'��^_`'C::�r�:� liXt'.2,r`4'�n `� t• ^y o: a#.3 : 8.1 Monthly progress reports and meetings a. Progress Reports S.Nedic PM 24 0 20 20 20 b. Progress Meetings S.Nedic PM 24 0 100 20 120 120 8.2 Project startup and bi-monthly status meetings S.Nedic Ph4 12 0 100 150 250 250 A.Wistrom PE 24 0 0 0 Z.Erdal E 48 0 11 01 0 8.3 Task progress reporting meetings and Draft S.Nedic Pbl 14 0 100 300 400 400 Report review meeting A.Wistrom PE 28 0 1,385 1,385 Z.Erdal E 70 0 0 0 TOTAL TASK 8 1 244 0 300 0 490 2,175 2,175 GRAND:TOTAL. 2,042 :. ` 2.1.2250 ',-,-,500 ,0 :1:8y988 ; .�;10;873; 223,;123 MINUTES OF MEETING JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT November 10, 2003, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the Orange County Water District on November 10, 2003, at 5:30 p.m. The following persons were present: OCSD Committee Members & Alternates OCWD Committee Members & Alternates Norman Eckenrode, Vice Chair Philip Anthony, Chair Shirley McCracken Paul Cook Brian Donahue Lawrence Kraemer, Jr. Paul Walker, Alternate No. 2 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 2 OCSD Directors John Collins OCWD Directors Wes Bannister OCSD Staff Denis Bilodeau Blake Anderson, General Manager Jan Debay Others Present OCWD Staff Paul Brown, Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. Virginia Grebbien, General Manager Dick Corneille, Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. Michael Markus, Program Manager Debra Burris, DDB Engineering Bill Everest, Design Manager Abdul Rashidi, Montgomery Watson Harza Shivaji Deshmukh, Senior Engineer Mike Dumitrache, Northwest Pipe Co. Mehul Patel, Senior Engineer Steven Agor, Tetra Tech, Inc. Joanne Daugherty, Engineer Peter Kim, Tetra Tech, Inc. Ron Wildermuth, Director of Communications Brenda Deeley, Porter Novelli Marilyn Kuga, Recording Secretary PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, Chair Philip Anthony called the meeting to order. CONSENT CALENDAR Directors Cook and Kraemer requested removal of Item No. 2 from the Consent Calendar. Item No. 1 of the Consent Calendar was approved, and Item No. 2 was pulled for discussion as follows: 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Minutes of the October 13, 2003 Joint Cooperative Committee Meeting was approved as mailed. 2. Emerson Process Controls, Inc. Change Order No. 1 Directors Cook and Kraemer requested clarification . Mr. Markus explained that the $993,674 increase in the contract amount to Emerson Process Controls, Inc. was budgeted. He further explained that the original task order amount determined in October 2002 at the preliminary design stage (30% design)was established with the understanding that at final design, a cost increase would become necessary. Following discussion, the Committee moved for approval of this item and requested that staff prepare a supplemental report showing a more detailed breakdown of process control system (PCS) costs. Upon motion made by Director Cook, seconded by Director McCracken and carried, the Committee recommended that the OCWD Board, at its November 19 Board meeting: Authorize issuance of Change Order No. 1 to the Emerson Process Controls, Inc. in the amount of$993,674 for a total contract amount of$2,945,916. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 3. Award of Contract No. GWRS-2003-4, Groundwater Replenishment System Unit II Pipeline Project Senior Engineer Shivaji Deshmukh provided a brief presentation on bid results of the GWR System Unit II Pipeline Project and recommended award of the contract to Colich Construction, L.P., for the bid amount of$16,084,005. Director Norm Eckenrode suggested that staff prepare a table of projects that would track engineers' estimates against awarded bids for contracts of$1 million or more. Upon motion made by Director Cook, seconded by Director McCracken and carried, the Committee recommended that the OCWD and OCSD Boards, at their respective November 19 meetings: 1. Receive and file Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids; 2. Ratify issuance of Addenda Nos. 1-3; and 3. Accept bid and award Contract No. GWRS-2003-4, Groundwater Replenishment System Unit II Pipeline Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, Colich Construction, L.P., for$16,084,005. 4. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Bids for the Groundwater Replenishment System Unit I Pipeline Proiect Mr. Deshmukh briefly explained that plans and specifications have been finalized for the GWR System Unit I Pipeline Project and asked that the Committee approve the plans and specifications and authorize the OCWD General Manager to solicit bids for the project estimated at $29,400,000. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Committee approved the plans and specifications for the GWR System Unit I Pipeline Project and authorized the General Manager to solicit bids for the project. 2 5. Ward Street Entrance Location and Traffic Report Program Manager Mike Markus explained that the proposal to move OCWD's new main entrance from Ellis Street to Ward Street was followed by a proposal to move the Ward Street entrance approximately 300 feet north of its current location. Mr. Markus then introduced traffic engineer Peter Kim of Tetra Tech, Inc., whose traffic analysis evaluating these proposals also included calculations for an increase in employees and the redirecting of traffic from Ellis Street to the new entrance. Mr. Kim reported that during peak rush hours (7:30 a.m. — 8:30 a.m.) near the District's facilities, approximately 800 cars per hour travel on Ward Street and approximately 2,200 cars per hour travel on Ellis Street. He further reported that there would be no significant impact to traffic regarding the revised entrance on Ward Street. Mr. Markus informed the Committee that staff recently submitted the traffic study to the City of Fountain Valley and that City Engineer Mark Lewis was supportive of plans for the new entrance. However, as noted by Director Bilodeau, it does not appear that the City of Fountain Valley will authorize a traffic signal at the proposed entrance on Ward Street. Following discussion of the Committee's concerns regarding potential traffic problems at the proposed Ward Street entrance, staff was directed to conduct an internal traffic circulation study and to prepare an illustration of the revised entrance in the final plans. Upon motion duly made, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Committee recommended that the OCWD Board, at its November 19 meeting: Receive and file the proposed Ward Street Entrance and Traffic Access Study and direct staff to conduct an internal circulation study and prepare an illustration of the revised entrance in the final plans. 6. Design Update on the Advanced Water Treatment Facility Paul Brown of Camp Dresser & McKee explained that a meeting between top managers of major consultants involved with the design of the Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) met with General Managers of OCSD and OCWD on October 14, 2003 for final quality assurance review of the project. As a result of this meeting, it was determined that an additional two and one-half weeks (from November 4, 2003 to November 21, 2003) would be needed to recheck the plans and specifications for delivery on November 21, 2003. Mr. Brown confirmed that final design of the project had already been completed and that the purpose of this meeting would permit for last-minute design changes and assessment for a more perfect set of drawings. He added that cost would not be affected. In order to maintain the scheduled March 2004 date for award of the project, staff requested that the December JCC meeting be moved up a week to December 1, 2003. (Ms. Grebbien assured the Committee that the joint campus concept should not affect the infrastructure of the facility.) Upon motion made by Director Kraemer, seconded by Director Walker and carried, the Committee postponed approval of plans and specifications and authorization to solicit bids for the Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) project to a specially scheduled JCC meeting on December 1, 2003. 3 7. Joint Water Campus and Related SiQnage Concepts OCSD General Manager Blake Anderson explained that the concept of a common campus for OCSD, OCWD, Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and National Water Research Institute (NWRI) would not only provide improved security and better access and communication between agencies, but also make a dramatic statement to the public regarding the relationship established among the agencies. Directors Cook and Kraemer cautioned the Committee to consider the benefits of maintaining a separate campus for reasons of public perceptions, while Director Shirley McCracken stated that the Committee now needs to have the vision to move forward and work together. Director John Collins suggested that legal counsel review the legal issues of a joint campus. Following discussion, staff was requested to provide additional information for proceeding with the concept of a joint campus before signage can be developed. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Committee requested that staff provide additional information for proceeding with the concept of a joint campus. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 8. Noise Study for Groundwater Replenishment System AWTF Mr. Deshmukh presented a noise study generated by Weiland Associates, Inc., a sub- consultant of Camp Dresser & McKee, that identified and assessed potential noise impacts associated with the operation of Phase 1 of the GWR System. Results of the study concluded that, with construction mitigation measures and plant noise control programs, decibel levels emitted from the AWTF would be insignificant. Staff also reported that the City of Fountain Valley has been made aware of the project's noise abatement program. 9. Project Schedule and Budget Update Mr. Markus summarized that the project schedules for each of the seven major contracts for the GWR System are tracking well. He added that monthly expenditures are within budget and that approximately $39 million has been spent since April 2001. Staff was requested to provide a plus and minus recap of spending on the projects. 10. Construction Proiects Progress The three-page Monthly Progress Report— October 2003 and the comprehensive Monthly Progress Report— October 2003 were handed out. 11. Status Report • Grants and Loans Update — Mr. Deshmukh reported that the Miraloma Recharge Project, which includes an expansion of the GWR System and inclusion of a recharge basin, did not qualify for grant funds because this project appeared similar to the GWR System project which already received $30 million in grant funding from the State Department of Water Resources. 4 r Ms. Grebbien reported that the federal Conference Committee, under the FY04 appropriations process, appropriated $3.5 million for the GWR System for next year. She also reported that the bill to increase GWR System authorization from $20 million to $80 million has gone through House Subcommittee markup and is anticipated to go through full Committee approval by the end of the year, then to the Senate next year. • Public Information and Education Update — Communications Director Ron Wildermuth reminded the Committee that a Community Leadership Advisory Council Meeting has been scheduled for November 14, 2003 at 7:30 a.m. at OCSD. Mr. Wildermuth reported that the Public Information and Education meeting has been rescheduled to the third Thursday of each month at noon. DIRECTORS' ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS Director Cook announced that Paul Brown of Camp Dresser& McKee was recently promoted to National Manager of the Public Service Group. GENERAL MANAGER'S ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS Mr. Anderson responded to the Committee's earlier challenge for an accelerated completion of the project by acknowledging that it would be nearly impossible to complete this project before September 2007. Certain components of the OCSD capital improvements supporting the GWR System are unlikely to be sufficiently expedited. Ms. Grebbien requested staff poll the OCSD and OCWD Directors to see if the monthly JCC meeting can be held on another day. DETERMINATION OF ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON CONSENT CALENDAR FOR NOVEMBER 19, 2003 BOARD MEETING Item Nos. 2, 3 & 5 were approved for the Consent Calendar for the November 19, 2003 Board Meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:24 p.m. 5 '1 - REVISED - MINUTES OF MEETING JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT December 1, 2003, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the Orange County Water District on December 1, 2003, at 5:30 p.m. The following persons were present: OCSD Committee Members & Alternates OCWD Committee Members & Alternates Norman Eckenrode, Vice Chair Philip Anthony, Chair (absent) Shirley McCracken Paul Cook Brian Donahue (absent) Lawrence Kraemer, Jr. Brian Brady, Alternate No. 1 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Paul Walker, Alternate No. 2 (absent) Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 2 (absent) Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 3 (absent) Richard Chavez, Alternate No. 3 (absent) OCSD Directors OCWD Staff John Collins Virginia Grebbien, General Manager Michael Markus, Program Manager OCSD Staff Bill Everest, Design Manager Blake Anderson, General Manager Shivaji Deshmukh, Senior Engineer Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager Mehul Patel, Senior Engineer Carol Beekman, Communications Manager Joanne Daugherty, Engineer Anthony Manzano, Principal Engineer Others Present Mike Wehner, Director of Technical Services Paul Brown, Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. Roy Herndon, Chief of Hydrogeology Dick Corneille, Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. Ron Wildermuth, Director of Communications Debra Burris, DDB Engineering Larry Labrado, Legislative Affairs Specialist Abdul Rashidi, Montgomery Watson Harza Jenny Wedge, Public Affairs David Mosher, Montgomery Watson Harza Sharon Koike, Chief Financial Officer Mike Dumitrache, Northwest Pipe Co. Laura Li, Auditor Steven Agor, Tetra Tech, Inc. Joel Kuperberg, General Counsel Peter Kim, Tetra Tech, Inc. Marilyn Kuga, Recording Secretary Brenda Deeley, Porter Novelli Linda Martin, Porter Novelli Heather Wells, Emerson Clinton Roson (sp.), Neighbor Doug McLean, Neighbor PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, Vice Chair Norm Eckenrode called the meeting to order. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Previous Meetinq Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Minutes of the December 1, 2003 Joint Cooperative Committee Meeting were approved as mailed. 2. Issuance of Task Order to Geo-Environmental for Field and Laboratory Soils & Materials Testing Services for the Groundwater Replenishment Unit III Pipeline Proiect Following a brief discussion regarding the policy for evaluating the qualifications of bidders of professional services contracts, affirmation that the bidders discussed herein have been pre-qualified, and assurance by staff that future material with regard to the pre-qualification of bidders would be provided with clearer explanations, the following recommendation was made. Upon motion made by Director Cook, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the Committee recommended that the OCWD Board, at its December 17 Board meeting, authorize issuance of a Task Order to Geo-Environmental in an amount not to exceed $233,679 to provide field and laboratory soils & materials testing services for the Groundwater Replenishment Unit III Pipeline Project MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 3. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Bids for the Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Proiect Principal Engineer Anthony Manzano gave a brief presentation regarding the Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Project and explained that 16 wells at a cost estimate of $13,100,000 would be built at eight different locations in Huntington Beach. He added that all right-of-way permits have been secured. Following a brief discussion and additional input by Chief Hydrogeologist Roy Herndon regarding well sets, Mr. Manzano requested approval of plans and specifications and authorization for the OCWD General Manager to solicit bids for the project. Upon motion made by Director Brady, seconded by Director Cook and carried, the Committee approved the plans and specifications for the GWR System Barrier Project and authorized the General Manager to solicit bids for the project. 4. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Bids for the Groundwater Replenishment System Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) Proiect Mr. Markus began his presentation with a short announcement directing the Committee's attention to tables set up in the boardroom that displayed drawings and plans and specifications on the Barrier Project as well as on the AWTF Project. He pointed out that the design team, comprised of internal staff and Camp Dresser McKee (CDM) staff, put together a DVD containing plans and specifications and all reference materials on the 2 9 AWTF project, and that copies of this DVD were handed out to Committee members at this ' evening's meeting. He noted that contractors would be able to purchase these DVDs. Mr. Markus then began a brief presentation regarding the Groundwater Replenishment System Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) Project and explained that, following review of the final design, three minor changes to the GWR System Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would need to be addressed. He added that Addendum No. 3 would not affect the engineer's estimate for this project, estimated at$253.6 million, and which remains within the original budget of$453.9 million. Mr. Markus then deferred the matter to OCWD General Counsel Joel Kuperberg who stated that, under the law, when minor changes are reflected in a project, an addendum prepared in the form of a supplemental staff report would be sufficient to establish a finding that the project would not be affected by substantial changes. In that regard, Mr. Kuperberg added that the Committee's adoption of staff's recommendation would establish the finding that the Addendum is appropriate and that there would be no need to re-circulate the document. Following discussion regarding the Committee's concerns on related matters such as the water campus concept, visitors' center, and laboratory alternatives, and the assurance from staff that these matters continue to be evaluated, the Committee then made the following recommendation. Upon motion made by Director Kraemer, duly seconded and carried, the Committee: 1. Received and filed Addendum No. 3 to the Groundwater Replenishment System Environmental Impact Report (EIR) after establishing a finding that no subsequent EIR or supplement to the previously certified EIR is required: (a) No substantial changes are proposed in the project, which will require major revisions in the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (b) No substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (c) No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: (1) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; (ii) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; 3 (iii) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (iv) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; and 2. Approved the plans and specifications for the GWR System Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) Project and authorized the General Manager to solicit bids for the project. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 5. Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Permit Update Director of Technical Services Mike Wehner provided a slide presentation that explained the Department of Health Services (DHS) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) approval and permit process for the GWR System. He noted that the DHS Public Hearing was held on February 4, 2003, that their Findings of Fact was issued on July 28, 2003, and that OCWD submitted its application to the RWQCB on October 24, 2003. He went on to say that the RWQCB will issue one permit to cover both the initial 5 MGD plant and the full- scale 70 MGD GWR plant, that the Regional Board is expected to issue tentative requirements in February 2004, and that the Regional Board hearing and approval is expected in March 2004. Mr. Wehner explained that no fee would be required for reclamation permits because the State encourages reclamation. On the other hand, because the State encourages fees for discharges, an annual fee of$60,000 - $120,000 would be required for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) emergency discharges to the river whether they occur or not in a given year. As a result, Mr. Wehner suggested delaying application for the NPDES permit until 2007 and added that, although delaying application for the NPDES permit could involve a loss of certainty in the permit process, he felt comfortable after meeting with the RWQCB Executive Officer, with OCSD General Manager Blake Anderson concurring, that minimal risk would be incurred. Mr. Wehner then went on to summarize the status of an ongoing controversy surrounding the application of action levels and pointed out that the Los Angeles Regional Board has in the last several months been applying action levels to non-potable and groundwater recharge permits, and that it appears that the Santa Ana Regional Board, unfortunately, may follow its lead. Mr. Wehner emphasized that action levels are not intended for this type of application and should not be a part of waste discharge or reclamation requirements. 6. Cost Update (Capital and Operations & Maintenance) Mr. Markus, referring to handouts provided to the Committee, reported that the Capital Costs budget is on track. He noted that, per Director Eckenrode's request from a previous meeting, a table was prepared as a scorecard listing the difference between budgeted costs and actual costs for the nine major projects of the GWR System. 4 i Mr. Markus then reported on the Operations and Maintenance Costs and pointed out that a new category, referred to as Organizational Impacts, was created to support future operational impacts such as the need for hiring additional staff. Chief of Hydrogeology Roy Herndon then gave a brief presentation on GWR System recharge capacity and expressed confidence that Kraemer Basin's percolation capacity of 60 —65 mgd (million gallons per day) would be able to accept the remaining GWRS water after meeting the demands of the Talbert Barrier. Mr. Herndon further reported that 25 new injection wells and pipelines would be constructed by 2006 along the Talbert Barrier. 7. Proiect Schedule and Budget Update Mr. Markus briefly summarized the schedules for each of the seven major contracts for the GWR System and reported that project costs are all tracking very well. 8. Construction Projects Progress Mr. Markus mentioned that the three-page (color version) of the Monthly Progress Report - November 2003 had been handed out. He then reviewed with the Committee a slide presentation detailing the progress of construction on the Southeast Barrier Pipeline and Initial Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution Projects, and added that a Walking Tour of the construction sites at the District be scheduled for 4:30 p.m. on January 12, 2004, just prior to the regularly scheduled 5:30 p.m. Joint Cooperative Committee meeting. 9. Status Report • Grants and Loans Update — Ms. Grebbien reported that our Local Resources Program (LRP) application was successfully submitted to Metropolitan Water District (MWD) well within the expected timeframe and that the application was tailored to cover only the barrier portion and not the replenishment portion of the project at a base request of 18,000 acre-feet at $137 per acre-foot with two options as follows: Option 1: Base plus an additional 9,000 acre-feet at $111 per acre-foot; and Option 2: Base plus an additional 13,000 acre-feet at $100 per acre-foot which would allow MWD the opportunity to buy into the full 31,000 acre-feet. • Public Information and Education Update— OCSD Communications Manager Carol Beekman gave a brief Public Information and Education Update. 5 y DETERMINATION OF ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON CONSENT CALENDAR FOR THE C DECEMBER 17, 2003 BOARD MEETING Item No. 2 was approved for the Consent Calendar for the December 17, 2003 Board Meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:12 p.m. 6 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 01/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 14 � Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2003 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2003. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Investment Policy. The portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Long-Term Operating Monies, there is a investment policy compliance exception pertaining to the holding of two securities within PIMCO's Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio that had an acceptable rating at the time of purchase but has since fallen below the minimum rating allowed by the investment policy. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The first of these rating exceptions pertains to the holding of a United Airlines (UAL) Asset Backed Security with a par value of $1 .6 million, representing 0.41 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating from Moody's has fallen several times, from A3 to BA1, then to BA3, B3, B, and finally to CA. Likewise, the rating from Standard & Poor's has also fallen several times, first from A- to BBB, then to BB, then to B+, B-, and finally to CCC+. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if the security was sold at this time. The second ratings exception pertains to the holding of a $1 million par of the Philip Morris-Altria corporate bond with an April 2004 maturity, representing 0.26 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating with Moody's has fallen from A2 to Baal and then to H:\deplUin\220\white\FAHR\Monthly Treasurer Report\2003.04\TREASRPT012804.doc Page 1 Baa2, and with S&P from A- to BBB. During the month of November, PIMCO sold $4 million par of this original $5 million holding at a price of $101.9 for a realized loss of $134,400. PIMCO believes based on the underlying assets of the parent company, that the District would suffer a severe unwarranted loss if the remaining $1 million holdings were sold at this time. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of "credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. However, PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit for these two securities very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. BUDGET IMPACT This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) >; Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). The remaining $98.3 million proceeds from the 2003 COP debt issuance available for future capital improvements is being managed and invested by PIMCO with Union Bank of California serving as the Trustee. When combined with the reserves of the existing outstanding debt issues, total debt service reserves with trustees totals $160,213,000. In December, the District received $53.1 million from the fiscal year 2003-04 second and third property tax and user fee apportionments from the County of Orange. Of these amounts, $41.3 million was deposited within the District's Liquid Operating Portfolio with Mellon Bank with the remainder used to fund current obligations. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table on the following page details the book balances of the District's investment accounts at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown on the attached bar chart. Hideptkfrn1220\whde\FAHRNMonthly Treasurer Reporfl2003-041TREA$RPT012804.doc Page 2 0 c fl Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts December 31,2003 Yield (%) State of Calif. LAW $ 34,100,246 1.55 Union Bank Checking Account 815,107 0.89 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 91,100,342 1.37 PIMCO- Long-term Portfolio 383,028,089 2.55 Petty Cash 5,000 N/A TOTAL $509.048.784 2.27 Debt Service Reserves w/Trustees $160,213 442 2.03 ATTACHMENTS 1. Graph of Monthly Investment Balances by Type— Last Six Months 2. Investment Transactions and Balances in the State Local Agency Investment Fund 3. PIMCO Monthly Investment Recap & Yield Analysis Report 4. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report— Liquid Operating Monies 5. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report— Long-Term Operating Monies 6. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors — Liquid Operating Monies 7. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors — L-T Operating Monies 8. Mellon Trust Yield Analysis Report 9. Mellon Trust Asset Detail —Consolidated 10.Mellon Trust Transaction Detail - Consolidated MW:lc H:ldeptlftn\2201white\FAHRIMonthly Treasurer Report12003.041TREASRPT012804.doc Page 3 Prepared by Finance, 1/21/2004, 10:22 AM Monthly Investment Balances by Type- Last Six Months $700,000,000 ........................................................................................... _ . ............................... $600,000,000 - — — — - ---- - — - - - $500,000,000 - - - - -- -- — - — - $400,000,000 — - — — — - $300,000,000 - $200,000,000 $100,000,000 - $0 July August September October November December 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 O PIMCO- Long-tens ®PIMCO- Short-term ®COP Debt Reserves 13 LAIF 0 Bank Accts 0 Petty Cash H:\dept\fin\EXCEL.dta\220\white\Treasury Management\Monthly Investment Balances Graph.xls V Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund December 31, 2003 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance December 1,2003 $31,000,246 $31,000,246 $31,000,246 1.545 1.545 Deposits: 12/11/2003 9,700,000 9,700,000 9,700,000 1.545 1.545 12/18/2003 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 1.545 1.545 Total Deposits 13,700,000 13,700,000 13,700,000 1.545 1.545 Withdrawals: 12/3/2003 (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) 1.545 1.545 12/4/2003 (2,600,000) (2,600,000) (2,600,000) 1.545 1.545 12/10/2003 (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) 1.545 1.545 12/19/2003 (3,500,000) (3,500,000) (3,500,000) 1.545 1.545 12/23/2003 (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) 1.545 1.545 Total Withdrawls (10,600,000) (10,600,000) (10,600,000) 1.545 1.545 Balance December 31,2003 $34,100,246 $34,100,246 $34,100,246 1.545 1.545 9 P I M C O 840 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach,CA 92660 Tel: 949.720.6000 Fax: 949.720.1376 January 14, 2004 Mr. Mike White, CPA Controller Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Dear Mike: The following is a description of events in the bond markets during the month of December in addition to an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term, Liquid, and COP Proceeds portfolios over the period. Also included is a section on our outlook and preferred strategies to be pursued in your portfolios during the coming months. Bond Market Recap: Mixed economic releases, increased terrorist concerns and one repeated phrase from the Fed paved the way for bonds to gain in December. Although U.S. Treasuries returned 0.89% for the month, these gains were not without some volatility. Yields on the benchmark 10-year Treasury opened the month at 4.34%, rallied to a low of 4.10% on December 22 then retreated, finishing 2003 at 4.25%. Mortgage-backed securities returned 1.07%, outpacing Treasuries by 28 basis points after adjusting for duration. Corporate bonds also performed well as the Lehman Credit Index returned 1.11%, for a duration-adjusted excess return of 22 basis points. Lower quality investment grade corporates also outperformed, with Baa-rated bonds beating Treasuries by 50 basis points on a duration-adjusted basis, whereas Aaa excess returns were 1 basis point. High yield bonds posted strong performance,with the Lehman High Yield Index returning of 2.26%for December and 28.97% for 2003. The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee set the tone for bond markets in December. Despite reiterating that monetary policy would remain accommodative for a "considerable period," the Committee changed its bias with respect to future inflation risks. Policy makers had previously been more worried by a further unwanted deceleration in inflation. They now believe that inflation risks are balanced, equally likely to diminish or rise. Economic data for the month was consistent with the Fed's statement. On one hand, some data indicate that domestic output is expanding briskly. The ISM Manufacturing Index posted its strongest reading in 20 years, and the Federal Reserve Board's Industrial Production Index revealed that the economy experienced its largest monthly output gain in four years. On the retail front, the Census Bureau's Retail Sales Report (MARTS) showed a surprisingly strong 0.9% gain, creating optimism for a strong holiday 0 Mr. Mike White, CPA January 14, 2004 Orange County Sanitation District Page 2 season. On the other hand, the economy continues to struggle with excess capacity and wavering consumer confidence. Inflation, as measured by the CPI, surprised most analysts by falling 0.2%, and core consumer prices (excludes food and energy prices) dropped for the first time in 21 years. The University of Michigan's Index of Consumer Sentiment came in well below expectations, reflecting consumers' uncertainty about the current state of the economy. These conflicting economic reports, combined with the Homeland Security Threat Level being raised to "High Risk,"contributed to the volatility in the U.S. Treasury market throughout the month. Treasury yield changes during the month of December are summarized as follows: ■ 3-month bills: -1 basis point to 0.92% ■ 6-month bills: -2 basis points to 1.0 1% ■ 2-year notes: -22 basis points to 1.82% ■ 5-year notes: -11 basis points to 3.25% ■ 10-year notes: -9 basis points to 4.25% ■ 30-year notes: -6 basis points to 5.07% Per Attribution: Long-Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.62 percent for the month of December, underperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 14 basis points. The following points summarize returns for the period ended December 31: • The Long-Term portfolio underperformed the benchmark by 14 basis points for the month. • For the twelve-month period, the Long-Term portfolio returned 3 22%,underperforming the benchmark by 8 basis points. • Portfolio duration, below the index, was negative for monthly performance as rates fell across maturities. • Broader-than-index yield curve positioning was negative for performance as yields fell most in the 2-5 year sector. • An underweight exposure to Treasuries was positive, as the sector lagged higher yielding sectors during the month. • Exposure to mortgage-backed securities was positive for relative performance as the sector outperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • Corporate issues were positive for performance as the sector continued to perform strongly relative to other bond market sectors; however,an underweight exposure relative to the benchmark was negative. { II Mr. Mike White, CPA January 14, 2004 Orange County Sanitation District Page 3 Liquid Portfolio The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.09 percent during the month of December, performing in line with the 3-month Treasury Bill Index for the month. The following points summarize returns for the period ending December 31: • The Liquid portfolio performed in line with the benchmark for the month. • For the twelve-month period, the Liquid portfolio returned 1.22%,outperforming the benchmark by 15 basis points. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. 112003 COP Proceeds—Future Construction"Portfolio The COP Proceeds portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.09 percent during the month of December, performing in line with the 3-month Treasury Bill Index. The following points summarize returns for the period ending December 31: • The Liquid portfolio performed in line with the benchmark for the month. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. Outlook and Strategy: The recovery in the global economy will be sustained in 2004, with China joining the U.S. as an engine of growth. Further into the year, U.S. interest rates could rise up to 100 basis points for short maturities but less for longer maturities as markets anticipate tightening by the Federal Reserve. The timing of the Fed move, late in 2004 or early 2005, will depend on how quickly the economy narrows its output gap, measured by the slack in labor markets. This unused capacity, combined with enhanced labor productivity, will keep inflation tame. Key elements of PIMCO's forecast are: ■ In the U.S. economy, positive forces will outweigh negatives. The hoped for rebound in business investment is now a reality. Massive fiscal stimulus will also provide support,as will spending to rebuild lean inventories. ■ On the negative side, effects of large tax cuts will peak in 2004 and become a fiscal drag by 2005, while benefits of the boom in mortgage refinancing have already begun to dissipate. Employment growth will be muted because of productivity gains and outsourcing to low cost labor markets such as India and China. ■ China's contribution to growth is tied to its currency peg with the U.S.dollar. The peg forces China to follow the Fed's reflationary monetary policy, fueling a boom in investment for domestic infrastructure. This investment will promote growth in Asia and elsewhere as China imports commodities and components to build its infrastructure. While China will eventually succumb to pressure and revalue its currency, its currency peg will be sustained for the next year because the peg serves Chinese and U.S. interests. China will retain a Mr. Mike White, CPA January 14, 2004 Orange County Sanitation District Page 4 competitive pricing in dollar terms for its exports. It will use the dollars it earns to help finance the U.S. trade deficit,thereby stemming a freefall in the dollar and mitigating the rise in U.S. interest rates. ■ Japan is recovering without fiscal stimulus for the first time in a decade as healthier Japanese companies integrate with China. Japan's fiscal policy is now focused on reform of the banking sector. Euroland will be the laggard in 2004, but the recent collapse of the Growth and Stability Pact opens the door for needed fiscal stimulus that will offset a stronger euro. The bond market in 2004 will be challenging,with upward pressure on rates and full valuations in Treasuries, most corporates and mortgages. Active managers with the resources and skill to exploit a broad spectrum of strategies can add value,however, especially with a defensive posture focused on safe yield. We will continue to hold mortgages to benefit from their long-term structural advantages and will manage coupon selection to add value. We will limit exposure to corporate bonds given their rich valuations and will focus on more attractively priced issues. We plan to target duration near-to-below index to protect against the risk of upward pressure on rates. A broader-than-index yield curve maturity mix will be retained to enhance yield. The Fed will anchor the short end of the yield curve for most of 2004, keeping the curve steep and allowing investors focused on intermediate maturities to reap gains by "rolling down"the curve. We look forward to discussing these and other topics with you in the near future. Best regards, Christine Telish,CFA John M. Miller, CFA Vice President Senior Vice President ti Orange County Sanitation District for the month ending December 31,2003 Total Return Account-203 With Accrued Interest Without Accrued Interest Market Value 386,826,463 383,127.275 Book Value 381,559,990 377,860,802 Yield to Maturity 2.55 2.57 Short Term Account-603 With Accrued Interest Without Accrued Interest Market Value 91,383,024 91,124,651 Book Value 91,687.174 91,428,801 Yield to Maturity 1.37 1.37 2003 COP Proceeds-Future Construction-2203 With Accrued Interest Without Accrued Interest Market Value 98.474,403 98,241,800 Book Value 9B,587,111 98,354,508 Yield to Maturity 1.37 1.37 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 31 December 2003) Page 1 of I Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $91,383,024 • Mellon $91,363,311 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $91,687,174 • Mellon $91,691,878 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.17 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $155,351 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 78% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.09 0.08 3 Months: 0.26 0.24 12 Months: 1.22 1.07 Fiscal Year-to-Date: 0.54 0.48 Commentary • The Liquid portfolio outperformed the benchmark by I basis point for the month,and by 6 basis points fiscal year-to-date. • PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. 11Adep1\nn12201wh1te\Trcnsury Mi;.ALIQ0800-07-12.RPT.doc MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 31 December 2003) Page 1 of 3 Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $386,826,463 • Mellon $386,783,920 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $381,559,990 • Mellon $382,387,077 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.17 Of Index: 2.43 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATF CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $8 394,134 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 15% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No* 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.62 0.76 3 Months: 0.23 0.14 12 Months: 3.22 3.30 Fiscal Year-to-Date: 0.57 0.48 • The Long-Term portfolio underperformed the benchmark by 14 basis points for the month,and by 9 basis points fiscal year-to-date. • Portfolio duration,below the index,was negative for monthly performance as rates fell across maturities. • Broader-than-index yield curve positioning was negative for performance as relds fell most in the 2-5 year sector. • An underweight exposure to Treasuries was positive,as the sector lagged higher yielding sectors during the month. • Exposure to Mortgage-backed securities was positive for relative performance as the sector outperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • Corporate issues were positive for performance as the sector continued to perform strongly relative to other bond market sectors;however,an underweight exposure relative to the benchmark was negative. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 31 December 2003) Page 2 of 3 *Compliance Issues: $1,600,000 par of United Airlines(UAL)Pass-Through 2001-1-C(Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificate(EETC)-909317BC2),6.831%coupon,9/1/2008 maturity,representing 0.41%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis was purchased on 8/10/2001;and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BA (on 9/18/2001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 9/20/2001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BA to BA3 (on 12/21/2001)and by S&P from BBB to BB (on 6/28/02). Following news of the possible bankruptcy filing,the security was further downgraded in August(133 Moody's,B+by S&P). On November 29,2002,S&P further downgraded this issue to B,and shortly thereafter on December 9.2002,downgraded the issue one notch further to B-. On August 7,2003,S&P downgraded the issue to CCC+,while Moody's followed suit on August 28,2003 with a downgrade to CA. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. During the third quarter of 2003,UAL posted a$90 million profit before special charges and followed it up with a$60 million operating profit during the month of October,its fourth straight month of profits and cash flow. In addition,UAL met the requirements of its debtor-in-possession financing for the ninth straight month. System wide passenger revenue for October was up 9%year over year demonstrating that UAL continues the recovery that began in the early summer from the Iraqi war,SARS epidemic and the company's bankruptcy filing in December 2002. UAL ended October with an unrestricted cash balance of$1.9 billion,which is in line with other mainline carriers. UAL is proceeding with negotiations to arrange exit financing from bankruptcy. Key to this process is an improved business plan,including concessions from a number of the company's constituencies. This is essential before submitting a re-application to the Air Transportation Safety Board for government guaranteed loans. In the late 2000,UAL's pre-bankruptcy application was rejected as inadequate. In preparation for it reapplication,UAL has outlined four major issues that need to be resolved before it can complete an updated business plan. These issues include:pensions,a contractual agreement with Atlantic Coast Airlines,municipal bond litigation and rejection of aircraft leases under what is known as section 1110 b and c of the US bankruptcy code. The bankruptcy court granted UAL several extensions to present a plan of reorganization,the most recent of which expires in March 2004. UAL's approach to the bankruptcy process has been less efficient than US Airways and Air Canada. The company has yet to articulate a clear and coherent fleet plan,which makes the timing of its emergence from Chapter 1 I difficult to predict. Realistically,PIMCO expects not to see a completed reorganization until mid-2004 at the earliest. PIMCO continues to negotiate with UAL on the District's holdings and currently lead an ad hoc committee. This has been an extremely complicated effort due to the complex nature of UAL's bankruptcy. These negotiations have required PIMCO's analysts access to non-public information and they are now at a point in these workout negotiations where restructuring options are being discussed. Details on the options are non-public information and therefore sharing them results in parties becoming restricted. In light of this extremely complicated bankruptcy,PIMCO continues to strive to act in the most prudent manner to obtain maximum recovery. $1,000,000 par of Philip Morris-Altria NT(cusip 718154CH8),4/l/2004 maturity,representing 0.26%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis was purchased on 8/6/2001 at a price of 105.26. This security was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A2 to Baal on 4/01/2003,and then from Baal to Baa2 on 4/23/03. The security was downgraded by S&P from A-to BBB on 4/10/2003. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. In November,PIMCO sold$4,000,000 par(of the$5,000,000 original holding)at a price of 101.9 for a realized loss of$134,400. The Philip Morris USA downgrade activity was a result of a negative court judgment and its associated bonding requirement. In the Miles case,named after the initial plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit,an Illinois court fined Philip Morris$10.3 billion for allegedly deceiving smokers into thinking that"light"cigarettes were safer than regular cigarettes. The company,now a subsidiary of Altria,has said that the lawsuit was flawed and that it planned to appeal the ruling and the class certification order that preceded it. Prior to the judgment,PIMCO's analysis of Altria(the holding company and issuer of the debt)shows investment grade credit metrics even excluding in its entirety Philip Morris USA(the domestic tobacco subsidiary and the entity subject to all of the legal suits). The analysis was based on the assumption that the horizon of any final verdict would be years in the future,while the company would generated significant cash flow in the interim. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 31 December 2003) Page 3 of 3 On December 10,Philip Morris told the Illinois Supreme Court in its initial appellate brief that legal errors committed by the Madison County Circuit Court require reversal of the $10.1 billion Price class action judgment and decertification of the class of"lights"cigarette smokers. On March 21,Judge Nicholas Byron ruled that the company had violated Illinois consumer fraud statues and that purchaser of Marlboro and Cambridge Lights cigarettes were deceived into believing that the cigarettes delivered less tar and nicotine and therefore were less hazardous than their full-flavored counterparts. On September 16,the Illinois Supreme Court on its own action granted direct review of the verdict thereby shortcutting the normal appellate process. Philip Morris seeks reversal of the Price judgment primarily on four grounds: 1. The trial court's certification of the class violated Illinois's,class action statute and deprived the company of due process under state and federal law; 2. The plaintiff's claims were barred under Illinois law and the doctrine of federal preemption as a result of the federal government's comprehensive regulatory scheme governing cigarette advertising, labeling and tar and nicotine disclosures; 3. The plaintiffs' failed to establish any liability for the class representatives or the class as a whole;and 4. The$10.1 billion damage award lacked any legal or factual basis. According to a company spokesperson,the company"will ask the Illinois Supreme Court to find in favor of Philip Morris USA on all of the issues raised in its appeal,but a finding on any one of the four should be sufficient to justify reversal of the.judgrnent." PIMCO believes Altria is unlikely to sacrifice good subsidiaries to fund the bad one,which would create a bad precedent for future court cases. PIMCO continues to hold their positions at the holding company(Altria)level,but have suspended any additional purchases until greater clarity emerges on the likelihood of various outcomes. Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB in the event of a split rating. •$3,500,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities($2.5 million represented by cusip 345397SJ3 maturing 7/16/04 and$1 million represented by cusip 345397GV9 maturing 5/15/05),representing 0.91%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+,then to BBB on 10/25/02,and then to BBB-on 11/13/03. Moody's downgraded the securities on 1/16/02 from A2 to A3. •$3,000,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(cusip 370425SD3)maturing on August 28,2007,representing 0.78%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+,and a further downgrade to BBB occurring on 10/16/2002. The securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade from A2 on 6/14/03. •$1,750,000 par of Virginia Electric Power NT securities(cusip 927804EN0),maturing in 2006,represents 0.46%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The security was downgraded on 10/21/2002 by S&P from A-to BBB+,but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A3. H.ldepAfIM2201whitelTreasury MgmAL-T0800-03-12SPEdoc Report ID:GL8251 Asset Summary Base Currency:USD by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Ratc: LIQUID OPER PI117C0-OCSF07511102 12/31 1 2UU3_ - _ -_ Status:FINAL Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Shares Par Base Base Total Base CASH 86 CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR INTEREST 262,968.26 262,968.26 0.29% 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT-DOMESTIC 1,500,000.000 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1.64% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN 1YR 16,200,000,000 16,154,527.66 16,154,527.66 17.68% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS THAN 1 15,000,000.000 14,958,803.83 14,958,803.83 16,37% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN 1YR 13,200,000.000 13,168,747.50 13,168,747.50 14.41% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 159,080.160 159,080.16 159,080.16 0.17% 0.00 REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 8,400,000.000 8,400,000.00 8,400,000.00 9.19% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS- LESS THAN IYR 23,100,000.000 23,026,338.99 23,026,338.99 25.20% 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR 77,559,080.160 77,630,466.40 77,630,466.40 84.97% 0.00 CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 77,559,080.160 77,630,466.40 77,630,466.40 84.97% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR BANKING&FINANCE 6,302,000.000 6,508,328.58 6,399,421.95 7.00% -108,906.63 U.S. AGENCIES 6,650,000.000 6,876,036.50 6,681,290.31 7.31% -194,746,19 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 650,000.000 677,046.50 652,132.00 0.71% -24,914.50 U.S. DOLLAR 13,602,000.000 14,061,411.58 13,732,844.26 15.03% -328,567.32 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 13,602,000.000 14,061,411.58 13,732,844.26 15.03% -328,567.32 TOTAL ASSETS-BASE: 91,161,080.160 91,691,877.98 91,363,310.66 100.00% -328,567.32 1 Workbench — ---- —_ --- — -- _ — Report ID:GL8251 Asset Summary Base Currency:USD by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: LONG TERM OPER PIMCO-OCSF07522202 _ _ 12 _31 2()0$ Status:FINAL Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Shares Par Base Base Total Base CASH 86 CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR PENDING TRADES -2,531,623.30 -2,531,623.30 -0.65% 0.00 INTEREST 3,755,831.13 3,755,831.13 0.97% 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 2,700,000.000 2,690,984.00 2,690,984.00 0.70% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS THAN 1 3 1,300,000.000 31,209,102.61 31,209,102.61 8.07% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES- LESS THAN IYR 17,500,000.000 17,447,688.03 17,447,688.03 4.51% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 113,665.750 113,665.75 113,665.75 0.03% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS- LESS THAN IYR 37,900,000.000 37,706,336.65 37,706,336.65 9.75% 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR 89,513,665.750 90,391,984.87 90,391,984.87 23.37% 0.00 CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 89,513,665.750 90,391,984.87 90,391,984.87 23.37% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR ABS-AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 274,912.00 0.07% -1,325,088.00 ABS-HOME EQUITY 1,000,000.000 1,000,000.00 998,750.00 0.26% -1,250.00 BANKING&FINANCE 29,335,000.000 30,475,793.00 31,018,123.75 8.02% 542,330.75 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATION 2,425,788.580 2,425,788.58 2,577,279.08 0.67% 151,490.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS 1,088,725.740 1,089,885.64 1,107,419.16 0.29% 17,533.52 FHLMC POOLS 158,321.720 158,398.15 162,661.92 0.04% 4,263.77 FNMA POOLS 45,021,465.930 46,110,288.04 46,340,063.10 11.98% 229,775.06 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,313,859.060 3,297,217.83 3,356,281.61 0.87% 59,063.78 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 9,341,048.670 9,492,701.17 9,835,287.38 2.54% 342,586.21 INDUSTRIAL 8,000,000.000 8,248,380.00 8,257,780.00 2.13% 9,400.00 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 34,448,590.000 34,465,572.76 38,084,675.63 9.85% 3,619,102.87 INSURANCE 1,600,000.000 1,594,032.00 1,726,000.00 0.45% 131,968.00 PVT PLACEMENTS- MORE THN IYR 752,000.000 826,199.84 826,199.84 0.21% 0.00 U.S.AGENCIES 41,138,573.590 42,215,328.96 43,837,094.83 11.33% 1,621,765.87 U.S. GOVERNMENTS 92,597,276.280 100,770,646.50 99,508,801.63 25.73% -1,261,844.87 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 4,750,000.000 4,694,370.00 5,004,355.00 1.29% 309,985.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 3,000,000.000 3,530,490.00 3,476,250.00 0,90% -54,240.00 U.S. DOLLAR 279,570,649.570 291,995,092.47 296,391,934.93 76.63% 4,396,842.46 1 Workbench a --- ------- --- ------- --------- Report ID:GL8251 Asset Summary Base Currency:USD by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: [-LONG TERM OPER-PINCO-OCSF07522202 —_ _ 12/311 ZOW _ _ Status:FINAL Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Shares Par Base Base Total Base FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 279,570,649.570 291,995,092.47 296,391,934.93 76.63% 4,396,842.46 TOTAL ASSETS-BASE: 369,084,315.320 382,387,077.34 386,783,919.80 100.00% 4,396,842.46 2 Workbench K1 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07511102 2003/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 5,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.868 5,193,143.22 6.71 313384SR1 MAT 02/04/2004 A-1+ 5,193,143.22 5.70 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.688 996,879.16 1.28 313384SS9 A-l+ 996,879.16 1.09 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.614 597,681.67 .77 313384SWO MAT 02/09/2004 A-1+ 597,681.67 .66 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.732 1,994,641.11 2.57 313384TN9 MAT 02/25/2004 A-1+ 1,994,641.11 2.19 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.742 4,488,395.00 5.80 313384UE7 MAT 03/12/2004 A-1+ 4,488,395.00 4.93 900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CINS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.462 895,162.50 1.15 313384UK3 MAT 03/17/2004 A-1+ 895,162.50 .98 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.431 1,988,625.00 2.57 313384XA2 MAT 05/19/2004 A-1+ 1,988,625.00 2.18 5,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.906 5,195,138.00 6.71 313396SBO MAT 01/21/2004 A-1+ 5,195,138.00 5.70 6,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.760 5,985,610.83 7.73 313396TP8 MAT 02/26/2004 A-l+ 5,985,610.83 6.57 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.422 3,778,055.00 4.68 313396UZ4 MAT 03/31/2004 A-l+ 3,778,055.00 4.15 5,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT .000 .000 P-1 99.871 5,193,305.00 6.71 313588SPI MAT 02/02/2004 A-1+ 5,193,305.00 5.70 6,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT .000 .000 P-1 99.782 5,986,918.61 7.73 313588TF2 A-l+ 5,986,918.61 6.57 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.426 1,988,523.89 2.57 313588XA8 MAT 05/19/2004 A-1+ 1,988,523.89 2.18 1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.516 1,194,191.67 1.54 912795PK1 DUE 02/12/2004 DD 08/14/2003 A-1+ 1,194,191.67 1.31 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSF07511102 2003/12/31 RUN DATE 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 9 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOIOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 9,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.757 9,177,690.00 11.86 912795PPO 0.000% 03/11/2004 DD 09/11/03 A-1+ 9,177,690.00 10.07 6,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.785 6,486,041.25 8.30 912795PQB 0.000% 03/18/2004 DD 09/18/03 A-1+ 6,486,041.25 7.12 6,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.491 6,168,416.07 7.97 912795QA2 DUE 05/27/2004 DD 11/28/2003 A-1+ 6,168,416.07 6.77 1,500,000.00 WELLS FARGO BANK NA INSTL C/D .000 1.070 100.000 1,500,000.00 1.93 94975U2V8 1.070% 01/13/2004 DD 12/10/03 1,500,000.00 1.65 8,400,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO .000 .970 100.000 8,400,000.00 10.85 99414G593 00.970% 01/02/2004 DD 12/24/03 8,400,000.00 9.22 159,080.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 .807 AAA 100.000 159,080.16 .20 996085247 AAA 159,080.16 .17 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 .029 77,367,498.14 100.00 77,367,498.14 84.91 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 100,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NA MTN SR00043 .000 7.657 AA1 103.437 104,199.00 .75 045906BU7 7.920% 07/13/2004 DD 07/13/94 AA- 103,437.00 .11 1,000,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH A14ER .000 5.723 AA1 101.343 1,041,290.00 7.37 046003KA6 5.800% 04/20/2004 DD 04/20/99 AA- 1,013,430.00 1.11 500,000.00 BANK OF A14ERICA CORP SR GBL NT .000 6.470 AA2 102.390 518,385.00 3.72 06605OcW3 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/15/99 A+ 511,950.00 .56 650,000.00 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC .000 5.856 AA3 100.328 677,046.50 4.74 077858AA6 5.875% 02/01/2004 DD 02/01/94 A+ 652,132.00 .72 1,350,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS SYSTE .000 5.386 AAA 100.263 1,399,963.50 9.85 31331H6G7 6.40% 01/23/2004 DD 01/01/1999 AAA 1,353,555.90 1.49 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB .000 3.722 AAA 100.747 1,125,905.00 8.06 3134A4PH1 3.750% 04/15/2004 DD 04/15/02 AAA 1,108,219.53 1.22 a � YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 3 OCSF07511102 2003/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS .000 5.101 AAA 100.465 4,350,168.00 30.72 31359MEMI 5.125% 02/13/2004 DD 02/08/99 AAA 4,219,514.88 4.63 180,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN 1TR 00448 .000 7.111 AAA 101.953 183,801.60 1.33 36962GUR3 7.250% 05/03/2004 DD 05/01/00 AAA 183,515.40 .20 1,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN #TR 00545 .000 1.268 AAA 100.078 1,001,089.00 7.28 36962GYS7 VAR RT 05/20/2004 DD 05/20/02 AAA 1,000,780.00 1.10 1,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS INC .000 6.539 Al 101.312 1,045,590.00 7.37 524908B22 6.625% 04/01/2004 DD 03/26/99 A 1,013,120.00 1.11 250,000.00 NCNB TEX NATL BK DALLAS TEX NT .000 9.204 AA2 103.218 260,870.00 1.87 628857DJ0 9.500% 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/89 A+ 258,045.00 .28 627,000.00 NATIONSBANK CORP SR NTS .000 5.975 AA2 102.515 646,650.18 4.68 638585BJ7 6.125% 07/15/2004 DD 07/23/99 A+ 642,769.05 .71 520,000.00 NORWEST FINL INC NTS .000 7.101 AA1 101.390 531,538.80 3.83 669383DG3 7.200% 04/01/2004 DD 04/07/97 AA- 527,228.00 .58 1,000,000.00 US BANCORP MTN /TR 00119 .000 5.901 AA3 101.671 1,046,310.00 7.40 91159HEY2 6.000% 05/15/2004 DD 05/10/99 A+ 1,016,710.00 1.12 125,000.00 WELLS FARGO & CO NEW NT .000 6.448 AA1 102.750 128,605.00 .93 949746AA9 6.625% 07/15/2004 DD 07/28/99 AA- 128,437.50 .14 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES .000 5.222 14,061,411.58 100.00 13,732,044.26 15.08 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL .000 .747 91,428,909.72 100.00 91,100,342.40 100.00 ----------------- --------- YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE s 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 900,000.00 EUROPEAN INVEST DISC .000 .000 99.732 897,588.50 1.00 29878RCF3 03/15/2004 897,588.50 .23 20,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.731 20,744,004.66 23.26 313396RV7 MAT 01/15/2004 A-l+ 20,744,004.66 5.38 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.727 1,196,718.67 1.34 313396SKO MAT 01/29/2004 A-1+ 1,196,718.67 .31 4,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.661 4,684,085.28 5.25 313396SP9 MAT 02/02/2004 A-1+ 4,684,085.28 1.21 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.724 2,493,100.00 2.79 313396SZ7 MAT 02/12/2004 A-l+ 2,493,100.00 .65 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.581 2,091,194.00 2.34 313396UQ4 MAT 03/22/2004 A-1+ 2,091,194.00 .54 400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.900 399,600.00 .44 313588SR7 MAT 02/04/2004 A-1+ 399,600.00 .10 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT .000 .000 P-1 99.715 2,393,155.61 2.68 313588TF2 A-1+ 2,393,155.61 .62 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.553 3,783,014.00 4.24 313588TGO HAT 02/19/2004 A-1+ 3,783,014.00 .98 8,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.745 8,378,580.00 9.39 313588TN5 MAT 02/25/2004 A-1+ 8,378,580.00 2.17 400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.727 398,908.00 .44 313588TV7 MAT 03/03/2004 A-1+ 398,908.00 .10 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.735 997,350.00 1.11 313588UC7 MAT 03/10/2004 A-1+ 997,350.00 .26 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.735 1,097,080.42 1.23 313588UK9 A-1+ 1,097,080.42 .28 1,800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.633 1,793,395.50 2.01 36959HD79 04/07/2004 1,793,395.50 .47 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME i 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOCK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 4,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.516 4,478,218.75 5.02 912795PK1 DUE 02/12/2004 DD 08/14/2003 A-1+ 4,478,218.75 1.16 17,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.487 16,912,790.02 18.96 912795PV7 DUE 04/22/2004 DD 10/23/03 A-1+ 16,912,790.02 4.39 12,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.484 11,939,120.00 13.38 912795PW5 0.000% 04/29/2004 DD 10/30/03 A-1+ 11,938,120.00 3.10 4,400,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.482 4,377,207.88 4.90 912795PX3 0.000% 05/06/2004 DD 11/06/03 A-1+ 4,377,207.88 1.14 113,665.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 .807 AAA 100.000 113,665.75 .12 996085247 AAA 113,665.75 .03 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 .000 89,167,777.04 100.00 89,167,777.04 23.12 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 752,000.00 AIG SUNAMERICA GLOBAL REG S .000 5.325 109.867 826,199.84 .27 000907AAO 5.850% 08/01/2008 DD 08/08/01 826,199.84 .21 2,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG .000 5.806 AAA 103.343 2,568,906.25 .87 01F060618 6.000% 01/01/2034 DD 01/01/04 AAA 2,583,575.00 .67 1,500,000.00 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT .000 5.137 A2 107.062 1,527,135.00 .54 125581ADO 5.500% 11/30/2007 DD 12/02/02 A 1,605,930.00 .42 5,000,000.00 CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB NT .000 5.329 AA2 105.562 5,333,600.00 1.78 172967BP5 5.625% 08/27/2012 DD 08/26/02 A+ 5,278,100.00 1.37 79,205.45 FHLMC GROUP OG4-0353 .000 7.349 AAA 102.055 81,210.35 .02 3128DBMA2 7.500% 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 AAA 80,833.39 .02 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS .000 6.708 AAA 106.210 7,997,625.00 2.68 3133MAUN7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 7,965,729.75 2.07 79,116.27 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 .000 3.387 AAA 103.428 77,187.80 .02 31348SWZ3 6.384% 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97 AAA 81,828.53 .02 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS .000 4.909 AAA 106.938 11,521,271.50 4.09 31359MJX2 5.250% 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AAA 12,137,508.40 3.15 845,763.78 FNMA POOL #0254510 .000 4.887 AAA 102.305 871,13670 .29 31371KVB4 5.000% 11/01/2017 DD 10/01/02 AAA 865,256:01 .22 178,775.18 FNMA POOL #0254631 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 184,138.44 .06 31371KY47 5.000% 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03 AAA 182,671.92 .05 161,395.17 FNMA POOL #0254760 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 166,237.02 .05 31371K5V9 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 164,913.08 .04 70,264.77 FNMA POOL #0254866 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 72,372.72 .02 31371LCB3 5.000% 09/01/2018 DD 08/01/03 AAA 71,796.32 .02 372,934.60 FNMA POOL #0254953 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 377,712.83 .12 31371LE21 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 381,063.42 .10 994,777.04 FNMA POOL #0254987 .000 4.891 AAA 102.220 1,007,522.61 .34 31371LF46 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 1,016,861.01 .26 212,582.99 FNMA POOL #0323980 .000 5.694 AAA 105.371 221,949.93 .07 31374T2M0 6.0008 04/01/2014 DD 09/01/99 AAA 224,001.01 .06 32,605.47 FNMA POOL #0357328 .000 4.090 AAA 102.242 33,583.63 .01 31376J4MB 5.0008 01/01/2018 DD 01/01/03 AAA 33,336.40 .01 1,607,651.67 FNMA POOL 10357430 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 1,625,737.76 .55 31376KA71 5.000% 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 AAA 1,642,693.49 .43 65,850.21 FNMA POOL #0456482 .000 5.694 AAA 105.371 68,751.73 .02 31381CCT2 6.000% 02/01/2014 DD 02/01/99 AAA 69,397.08 .02 176,700.55 FNMA POOL #0509649 .000 5.694 AAA 105.371 184,486.42 .06 313830EWO 6.000% 09/01/2014 DD 09/01/99 AAA 186,191.30 .05 167,522.68 FNMA POOL #0535451 .000 5.694 AAA 105.371 174,904.15 .05 31384VZQB 6.000% 06/01/2015 DD 07/01/00 AAA 176,520.47 .05 3,639,256.33 FNMA POOL #0535672 .000 5.694 AAA 105.371 3,799,611.07 1.29 31384WCHI 6.000% 01/01/2016 DD 12/01/00 AAA 3,834,724.06 .99 1,204,979.34 FNMA POOL #0545296 .000 5.697 AAA 105.321 1,258,073.74 .42 31385HXZO 6.000% 11/01/2016 DD 10/01/01 AAA 1,269,097.38 .33 a + YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 101,480.30 FNMA POOL #0545580 .000 5.699 AAA 105.284 105,951.77 .03 31385JCR7 6.000% 03/01/2017 DD 03/01/02 AAA 106,042.10 .03 179,016.37 FNMA POOL #0555101 .000 5.691 AAA 105.421 186,904.26 .06 3138SWU23 6.000% 10/01/2017 DD 11/01/02 AAA 188,721.01 .05 804,067.43 FNMA POOL #0555285 .000 5.796 AAA 103.523 836,230.14 .28 31385W2S7 6.000% 03/01/2033 DD 02/01/03 AAA 832,398.26 .22 385,706.07 FNMA POOL #0555363 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 397,277.25 .13 31385W5Y1 5.000% 04/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 AAA 394,113.27 .10 39,571.60 FNMA POOL #0555453 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 40,080.64 .01 31385XBW6 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 AAA 40,436.18 .01 773,260.11 FNMA POOL #0555528 .000 5.796 AAA 103.523 804,190.52 .27 31305XD95 6.000% 04/01/2033 DD 05/01/03 AAA 800,505.47 .21 321,924.57 FNMA POOL #0555545 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 331,582.31 .11 31385XES2 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 328,941.53 .09 1,116,156.41 FNMA POOL #0555621 .000 4.091 AAA 102.220 1,120,713.17 .38 31385XG68 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 1,140,934.99 .30 65,121.39 FNMA POOL #0576386 .000 5.719 AAA 104.919 67,990.80 .02 31386XJ72 6.0008 05/01/2016 DD 05/01/01 AAA 69,324.61 .02 175,110.78 FNMA POOL #0576739 .000 5.699 AAA 105.284 182,826.60 .06 31386XV86 6.000% 04/01/2016 DD 04/01/01 AAA 184,362.92 .05 234,439.67 FNMA POOL #0580888 .000 5.698 AAA 105.309 244,769.66 .08 31387DJ91 6.000% 05/01/2016 DD 05/01/01 AAA 246,885.11 .06 185,028.00 FNMA POOL #0594002 .000 5.708 AAA 105.121 193,180.79 .06 31387T3K8 6.000% 01/01/2016 DD 07/01/01 AAA 194,503.45 .05 254,514.47 FNMA POOL #0597376 .000 5.699 AAA 105.284 265,729.01 .09 31387XT96 6.000% 09/01/2016 DD 08/01/01 AAA 267,961.97 .07 165,183.41 FNMA POOL #0605259 .000 5.699 AAA 105.2B4 172,461.00 .05 31388HMG1 6.000% 09/01/2016 DD 09/01/01 AAA 173,911.02 .05 103,238.98 FNMA POOL #060B366 .000 5.699 AAA 105.284 107,787.95 .03 313BOLZ78 6.000% 10/01/2016 DD 09/01/01 AAA 108,693.70 .03 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOK)K YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 170,576.06 FNMA POOL 10616734 .000 5.691 AAA 105.434 178,092.06 .06 31388WEF9 6.000% 12/01/2016 DD 12/01/01 AAA 179,844.46 .05 201,682.55 FNMA POOL #0630812 .000 5.717 AAA 104.946 210,569.19 .07 31389NYH2 6.000% 02/01/2017 DD 02/01/02 AAA 211,657.21 .05 849,074.67 FNMA POOL #0632376 .000 5.691 AAA 105.421 886,487.04 .30 31389QQ50 6.000% 07/01/2017 DD 07/01/02 AAA 895,103.77 .23 486,161.90 FNMA POOL #0653116 .000 5.691 AAA 105.421 507,583.41 .17 31390QSDB 6.000% 07/01/2017 DD 07/01/02 AAA 512,517.17 .13 195,671.54 FNMA POOL #0673280 .000 5.709 AAA 105.121 204,299.58 .06 31391P6R2 6.000% 08/01/2017 DD 11/01/02 AAA 205,698.36 .05 577,250.59 FNMA POOL #0681309 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 594,568.10 .19 31391Y3S4 5.000% 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03 AAA 589,832.86 .15 72,721.52 FNMA POOL #0681334 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 74,903.16 .02 31391Y4T1 5.000% 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03 AAA 74,306.62 .02 354,327.35 FNMA POOL #0684908 .000 4.989 AAA 102.280 358,867.17 .12 31400D3R1 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 362,404.92 .09 207,000.26 FNMA POOL #0685200 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 209,652.45 .07 31400EGH7 5.000% 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 AAA 211,512.22 .05 36,851.84 FNMA POOL #0685665 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 37,957.40 .01 31400EW22 5.000% 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03 AAA 37,655.10 .01 315,693.66 FNMA POOL #0686318 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 325,164.47 .10 31400FPB7 5.000% 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 AAA 322,574.80 .08 124,019.73 FNMA POOL #0688739 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 127,740.32 .04 31400JEL9 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 126,722.98 .03 127,379.92 FNMA POOL #0689859 .000 4.093 AAA 102.180 129,011.97 .04 31400KMG8 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 130,156.41 .03 751,602.57 FNMA POOL #0693834 .000 4.887 AAA 102.305 774,150.65 .25 3140OPY74 5.000% 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 AAA 760,924.68 .20 274,843.04 FNMA POOL #0695852 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 283,088.33 .09 31400SBVO 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 280,033.77 .07 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 040,680.93 FNMA POOL #0695809 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 865,901.35 .28 31400SC23 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 059,005.17 .22 27,089.43 FNMA POOL #0697026 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 27,902.13 .00 31400TLF2 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 AAA 27,679.90 .01 91,957.96 FNMA POOL #0698939 .000 5.691 AAA 105.434 96,009.86 .03 31400VPY2 6.000% 09/01/2017 DD 03/01/03 AAA 96,954.58 .03 277,879.67 FHHA POOL 10702210 .000 4.891 AAA 102.220 286,216.06 .09 31401ADP9 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 284,048.58 .07 149,630.61 FNMA POOL #0702328 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 151,547.76 .05 31401AHD2 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 AAA 152,892.09 .04 82,358.61 FNMA POOL #0703195 .000 5.684 AAA 105.559 85,987.54 .02 31401BGC3 6.000% 01/01/2017 DD 04/01/03 AAA 86,936.59 .02 302,649.05 FN14A POOL 10709148 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 311,728.52 .10 31401HZM7 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 309,245.86 .08 698,961.00 FNMA POOL #0709360 .000 4.093 AAA 102.180 707,916.44 .24 31401JB56 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 714,196.18 .19 145,426.99 FNMA POOL #0709826 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 147,290.27 .05 31401JSP4 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 148,596.85 .04 265,628.29 FNMA POOL #0709917 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 269,031.65 .09 31401JVJ4 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 271,418.16 .07 27,155.10 FNMA POOL #0709963 .000 4.891 AAA 102.220 27,503.03 .00 31401JWYO 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 27,757.94 .01 807,079.03 FNMA POOL #0710235 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 931,291.41 .27 31401KBCB 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 824,670.85 .21 25,800.14 FNMA POOL #0713344 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 26,574.14 .00 31401NP52 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 26,362.50 .01 336,717.67 FNMA POOL #0713365 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 341,031.86 .11 31401NQS1 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 AAA 344,057.07 .09 992,167.21 FNMA POOL #0720319 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 1,004,879.35 .34 31401WG45 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 AAA 1,013,793.38 .26 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 10 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,439,536.98 FNMA POOL #0720369 .000 4.891 AAA 102.220 2,512,723.09 .84 31401WJN0 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 2,493,694.51 .65 315,691.37 FNMA POOL #0721629 .000 4.887 AAA 102.305 325,162.12 .10 31401XVW4 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 322,967.08 .08 253,209.80 FNMA POOL #0723487 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 256,058.41 .08 31402AXQ4 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 258,728.99 .07 430,832.16 FNMA POOL #0729601 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 436,352.20 .14 31402HRW3 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 AAA 440,222.97 .11 36,580.96 FNMA POOL #0732873 .000 4.883 AAA 102.405 37,049.65 .01 31402MFN5 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 37,460.62 .01 751,447.78 FNMA POOL #0737130 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 761,075.70 .25 31402S4P9 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 767,827.01 .20 592,771.45 FNMA POOL 10738211 .000 4.891 AAA 102.220 600,366.34 .20 31402UDQ2 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 605,930.93 .16 225,351.96 FNMA POOL #0738487 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 228,239.28 .07 31402UNC2 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 230,263.93 .06 700,464.06 FNMA POOL #0740471 .000 4.891 AAA 102.220 709,438.75 .24 31402WT40 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 716,014.31 .19 830,872.68 FNMA POOL #0740748 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 841,518.23 .28 31402WSH7 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 848,983.13 .22 1,183,643.76 FNMA POOL #0744008 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 1,198,809.19 .40 31403BR54 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 AAA 1,209,443.52 .31 175,843.14 FNHA POOL #0744316 .000 4.891 AAA 102.220 178,096.13 .06 31403B3Z4 5.000% 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 AAA 179,746.84 .05 362,925.28 FNMA POOL #0747914 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 367,575.26 .12 31403F3X0 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 370,835.93 .10 244,330.37 FNMA POOL #0748400 .000 4.891 AAA 102.220 247,460.86 .08 31403GNR9 5.000% 08/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 AAA 249,754.48 .06 1,039,682.54 FNMA POOL #0748899 .000 4.896 AAA 102.121 1,053,003.47 .35 31403G7L0 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 1,061,739.36 .28 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE 01/07/O4 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.46.28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,550,466.67 FNMA POOL /0750377 .000 4.896 AAA 102.121 2,583,144.52 .87 31403JUA2 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 2,604,572.24 .68 2,138,225.97 FNMA POOL #0750380 .000 4.896 AAA 102.121 2,165,622.00 .73 31403JUD6 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 2,183,586.27 .57 194,148.32 FNMA POOL #0750445 .000 4.896 AAA 102.121 196,635.84 .06 314033WE2 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 198,266.90 .05 914,095.83 FNMA POOL #0751960 .000 4.891 AAA 102.220 925,807.69 .31 31403LMHI 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 934,388.68 .24 995,372.46 FNMA POOL #0753425 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 1,006,881.45 .34 31403NA23 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 1,017,068.49 .26 653,924.60 FNMA POOL #0755165 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 662,303.00 .22 3140306A3 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 668,178.13 .17 995,525.56 FNMA POOL #0756372 .000 4.893 AAA 102.180 1,007,036.32 .34 31403SJR8 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 1,017,224.93 .26 45,596.00 FNMA POOL #0765165 .000 4.937 AAA 101.281 46,180.20 .01 31404DCA4 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 46,190.20 .01 336,975.86 GNMA POOL #0596612 .000 6.152 AAA 105.660 353,666.69 .12 36200BYH4 6.500% 09/15/2032 DD 09/01/O2 AAA 356,049.23 .09 1,220,097.30 GNMA POOL #0569358 .000 6.161 AAA 105.507 1,240,693.33 .43 36200OQK3 6.500% 04/15/2032 DD O4/01/02 AAA 1,287,291.21 .33 53,160.94 GNMA POOL #0569685 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 55,794.06 .01 36200Q2S2 6.500% 02/15/2032 DD 02/01/02 AAA 56,186.55 .01 90,472.27 GNMA POOL #0570019 .000 6.152 AAA 105.660 94,953.48 .03 3620ORG48 6.500% 07/15/2032 DD 07/01/02 AAA 95,593.15 .02 558,690.44 GNMA POOL #0574323 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 506,363.08 .19 3620OWAY7 6.500% 12/15/2031 DD 12/01/01 AAA 590,487.80 .15 59,181.88 GNMA POOL #0575364 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 62,113.23 .02 36200XFD6 6.500% 11/15/2031 DD 11/01/01 AAA 62,550.16 .02 21,553.91 GNMA POOL 00587117 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 22,621.50 .00 36201MG22 6.500% 06/15/2032 DD 06/01/02 AAA 22,700.63 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 12 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE s 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 65,141.43 GN14A POOL #0587439 .000 6.152 AAA 105.660 68,367.96 .02 36201MS45 6.500% 11/15/2032 DD 12/01/02 AAA 68,828.54 .02 14,938.65 GNMA POOL #0421389 .000 6.130 AAA 106.035 15,678.59 .00 36206UC23 6.500% 04/15/2026 DD 04/01/96 AAA 15,840.22 .00 24,972.91 GN14A POOL 10449B51 .000 6.155 AAA 105.611 26,209.85 .00 36208FWLO 6.500% 01/15/2028 DD 01/01/98 AAA 26,374.06 .01 67,365.96 GNMA POOL 10466845 .000 6.137 AAA 105.910 70,702.68 .02 36209BTA6 6.500% 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98 AAA 71,347.40 .02 260,930.32 GNMA POOL 10468052 .000 6.137 AAA 105.910 273,854.52 .09 36209C5M4 6.500% 07/15/2028 DD 07/01/98 AAA 276,351.72 .07 212,869.16 GNMA POOL #0476041 .000 6.137 AAA 105.910 223,080.23 .07 36209MZE7 6.500% 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98 AAA 225,450.07 .06 164,280.07 GNMA POOL #0478626 .000 6.143 AAA 105.816 172,160.38 .05 36209QVT9 6.500% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 173,835.27 .05 169,313.94 GNMA POOL #0480598 .000 6.137 AAA 105.910 177,435.73 .06 36209S3F6 6.500% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/9B AAA 179,320.66 .05 460,065.96 GNMA POOL #04B5527 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 482,853.60 .16 36209YLGI 6.500% 06/15/2031 DD 06/01/01 AAA 486,250.20 .13 519,423.75 GNMA POOL #0485610 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 545,151.46 .19 36209YN38 6.500% 07/15/2031 DD 07/01/01 AAA 545,906.29 .14 105,649.63 GN14A POOL #0485682 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 110,882.59 .03 36209YRB6 6.500% 08/15/2031 DD 08/01/01 AAA 111,662.58 .03 100,873.49 GNMA POOL #0485703 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 105,869.89 .03 36209YRY6 6.500% 08/15/2031 DD 08/01/01 AAA 106,614.61 .03 10,933.58 GN14A POOL #0512235 .000 6.143 AAA 105.816 11,475.13 .00 36211GBC6 6.500% 11/15/2029 DD 11/01/99 AAA 11,569.52 .00 167,769.61 GN14A POOL #0514326 .000 6.143 AAA 105.816 175,817.30 .05 36211JLF2 6.500% 07/15/2029 DD 07/01/99 AAA 177,527.78 .05 51,641.65 GNMA POOL #0530053 .000 6.161 AAA 105.497 54,199.53 .01 36212CZS3 6.500% 04/15/2031 DD 04/01/01 AAA 54,480.31 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 13 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 105,041.92 GNMA POOL 10537885 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 110,244.77 .03 36212MREI 6.500% 02/15/2031 DD 02/01/01 AAA 111,020.29 .03 13,368.71 GNMA POOL #0547512 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 14,030.88 .00 36212YGV9 6.500% 04/15/2031 DD 04/01/01 AAA 14,129.58 .00 128,337.46 GNMA POOL 10547715 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 134,493.65 .04 36212YN82 6.500% 02/15/2031 DD 02/01/01 AAA 135,641.67 .04 77,723.07 GNMA POOL 00552322 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 81,572.79 .02 36213ESK3 6.500% 01/15/2032 DD 01/01/02 AAA 82,146.61 .02 595,133.47 GNMA POOL #0552466 .000 6.161 AAA 105.507 624,611.18 .21 36213EW36 6.500% 03/15/2032 DD 03/01/02 AAA 627,909.01 .16 457,133.87 GNMA POOL 10552659 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 479,776.27 .16 36213E5U6 6.500% 07/15/2032 DD 07/01/02 AAA 483,151.23 .13 457,964.66 GNMA POOL #0561017 .000 6.150 AAA 105.691 480,669.21 .16 36213QG29 6.500% 07/15/2031 DD 07/01/01 AAA 484,050.44 .13 276,925.69 GNMA II POOL #0080395 .000 3.461 AAA 101.141 274,416.05 .09 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 280,086.52 .07 2,477,095.70 GNMA II POOL f080408% .000 3.462 AAA 101.089 2,451,937.69 .84 36225CN28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 2,504,058.89 .65 5,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN #TR 00575 .000 5.239 AAA 104.031 5,203,500.00 1.75 36962GZY3 5.450% 01/15/2013 DD 12/06/02 AAA 5,201,550.00 1.35 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR NT .000 5.703 A3 107.406 3,064,350.00 1.00 370425SD3 6.125% 08/28/2007 DD 08/29/02 BBB 3,222,180.00 .84 3,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC SR NT .000 4.023 AA3 102.531 3,030,030.00 1.03 38141GCS1 4.125% 01/15/2008 DD O1/13/03 A+ 3,075,930.00 .80 1,635,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT .000 5.789 Al 110.125 1,772,820.00 .60 441812JW5 6.375% 10/15/2011 DD 10/23/01 A 1,800,543.75 .47 3,000,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO SUB NT .000 5.453 A2 105.453 3,127,260.00 1.06 46625HAT7 5.750% 01/02/2013 DD 11/25/02 A 3,163,590.00 .82 3,200,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY NT .000 3.620 AA3 100.140 3,195,648.00 1.08 617446HW2 3.625% 04/01/2008 DD 03/06/03 A+ 3,204,480.00 .83 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 14 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 3,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL UTILS COOP FIN .000 6.222 A2 116.515 3,465,480.00 1.17 637432CU7 7.250% 03/01/2012 DD 03/07/02 A 3,495,450.00 .91 1,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS .000 7.423 BAA2 101.031 1,052,600.00 .34 718154CHS 7.500% 04/01/2004 DD 04/01/97 BBB 1,010,310.00 .26 1,000,000.00 RESIDENTIAL ASSET 03-RS11 AIIB .000 1.472 AAA 99.875 1,000,000.00 .33 760985K83 VAR RT 12/25/2033 DD 12/30/03 AAA 998,750.00 .26 3,497,276.28 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 .000 5.834 AAA 108.670 3,497,276.28 1.28 83162CLJ0 6.340% 03/01/2021 AAA 3,800,490.13 .99 2,425,788.58 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS O1 .000 6.250 AAA 106.245 2,425,788.58 .86 831641DD4 6.640% 02/10/2011 DD 02/21/01 HR 2,577,279.08 .67 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1 C .000 39.757 CA 17.182 1,600,000.00 .09 909317BC2 6.831% 03/01/2010 DD 08/22/01 A- 274,912.00 .07 20,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.605 AAA 111.500 22,620,312.50 7.52 9128272J0 06.250% 02/15/2007 DD 02/15/97 AAA 22,300,000.00 5.78 3,435,480.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .000 3.277 AAA 110.625 3,746,156.05 1.28 9128273T7 3.625% 01/15/2008 DD O1/15/98 AAA 3,800,499.75 .99 14,665,170.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .000 3.430 AAA 112.969 16,296,705.73 5.58 9128274Y5 3.875% 01/15/2009 DD O1/15/99 AAA 16,567,095.90 4.30 57,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.353 AAA 107.406 62,782,901.47 20.69 9128276N7 05.750% 11/15/2005 DD 11/15/00 AAA 61,329,111.50 15.91 12,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NT .000 3.229 AAA 100.660 11,870,156.25 4.07 912828BG4 3.250% O8/15/2008 DD 08/15/03 AAA 12,079,200.00 3.13 3,000,000.00 VERIZON GLOBAL FDG CORP GLOBAL .000 6.365 A2 115.875 3,530,490.00 1.17 92344GAT3 7.375% 09/01/2012 DD 08/26/02 A+ 3,476,250.00 .90 1,750,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PWR O1 SER A .000 5.371 A3 107.062 1,743,840.00 .63 927804EN0 5.750% 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01 BBB+ 1,873,585.00 .49 16,347,940.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 1.817 3.114 AAA 108.375 14,422,710.98 5.97 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD O1/15/97 AAA 17,717,079.98 4.60 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 5 .967 6.705 AAA 106.261 16,154,410.00 5.55 31359MFHI 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/14/00 AAA 16,470,476.70 4.27 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 15 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIRE : 13.46.20 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAR VALUE YT'H AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION B04K YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,088,725.74 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A 6.316 3.774 AAA 101.717 1,089,895.64 .37 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97 AAA 1,107,419.16 .29 725,638.94 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 6.320 1.643 AAA 100.681 725,638.94 .24 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 730,580.54 .19 7,327.03 GNMA POOL #0500917 6.389 5.747 AAA 104.398 6,954.95 .00 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 7,649.31 .00 36,727.75 GNHA POOL #0506636 6.389 5.747 AAA 104.398 34,862.66 .01 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 38,343.20 .01 317,562.14 GNMA POOL #0503388 6.389 5.747 AAA 104.398 301,435.94 .11 36210VF55 6.000% 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99 AAA 331,529.92 .09 12,669.69 GNMA POOL #0499153 6.389 5.747 AAA 104.398 12,026.31 .00 36210QQE5 6.000% 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 13,226.96 .00 440,836.95 GN14A POOL #0496461 6.390 5.747 AAA 104.398 418,450.69 .15 36210MQN4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 460,226.90 .12 107,847.98 GNMA POOL #0491103 6.390 5.747 AAA 104.398 102,371.34 .03 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 112,591.61 .03 12,287.36 GNMA POOL #0486720 6.390 5.747 AAA 104.398 11,663.40 .00 36210AVM6 6.000% 12/15/2020 DD 12/01/98 AAA 12,827.81 .00 23,358.26 GNMA POOL #0497343 6.390 5.747 AAA 104.398 22,172.10 .00 3621ONP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AAA 24,385.66 .01 16,366.70 GNMA POOL #0469688 6.391 5.747 AAA 104.398 15,535.57 .00 36209EXR8 6.000% 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/98 AAA 17,086.58 .00 22,840.65 GNMA POOL #0467279 6.391 5.747 AAA 104.398 21,680.78 .00 36209CCQ7 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/90 AAA 23,845.28 .01 38,349.79 GNHA POOL #0457814 6.391 5.747 AAA 104.398 36,402.33 .01 36208QSB3 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 40,036.58 .01 398,071.70 GNMA POOL #0467286 6.391 5.747 AAA 104.398 377,857.12 .14 36209CCX2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 415,580.64 .11 494,398.16 GNMA POOL #0465555 6.392 5.747 AAA 104.398 469,292.01 .17 36209AE48 6.000% 09/15/2020 DD 09/01/98 AAA 516,143.97 .13 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 16 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.46.28 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BVOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 13,190.47 GNMA POOL #0483452 6.392 5.747 AAA 104.398 12,520.65 .00 36209WBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 13,770.64 .00 459,044.75 GNMA POOL 10465546 6.392 5.747 AAA 104.398 435,733.89 .16 36209AET3 6.000% OB/15/2028 DD 08/01/98 AAA 479,235.56 .12 320,888.06 GNMA POOL #0466339 6.392 5.747 AAA 104.398 304,592.98 .11 36209DHQO 6.000% 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98 AAA 335,002.13 .09 29,383.16 GNMA POOL #0438057 6.393 5.747 AAA 104.398 27,891.06 .01 36207PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 30,675.56 .01 18,872.20 GNMA POOL #0468330 6.393 5.747 AAA 104.398 17,913.83 .00 36209DHF4 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 19,702.28 .01 3,017,014.63 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 6.499 5.720 AAA 104.897 2,860,874.69 1.06 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 3,164,757.84 .82 330,186.28 GNMA II POOL i080088M 6.705 4.295 AAA 101.859 337,409.10 .11 36225CC20 7.375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 AAA 336,325.10 .09 2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.717 6.476 A2 102.296 1,992,280.00 .69 57174BAB8 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 AA- 2,045,920.00 .53 2,500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.533 A3 102.562 2,495,900.00 .86 345397SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 BBB- 2,564,050.00 .67 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LNS INC NT 6.866 6.690 A3 102.390 2,490,400.00 .86 22237UABB 6.850% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2,559,750.00 .66 229,651.39 GN14A II POOL #0080023 6.992 4.504 AAA 102.602 233,454.99 .07 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 235,811.10 .06 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 7.113 5.900 AAA 114.226 2,030,133.00 .80 3135914EY5 6.625% 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 AAA 2,398,750.83 .62 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 7.582 6.440 A3 104.812 965,170.00 .35 345397GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93 BBB- 1,048,120.00 .27 945,920.02 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE #000-11150 7.684 7.319 AAA 102.471 925,375.03 .32 302998GE3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 969,290.77 .25 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN #TR 00115 7.709 6.995 A3 104.359 2,950,530.00 1.05 69512EEU5 7.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,130,770.00 .81 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 17 OCSF07522202 2003/12/31 RUN DATE 01/07/04 DISTRICT: LONG—TERM OPERATING RUN TIME s 13.46.28 PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ $ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S—P PRICE MARKET VALUE $ TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 7 .967 7.300 Al 107.875 1,594,032.00 .58 020002AL5 7.875% 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 A+ 1,726,000.00 .45 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES .375 5.222 291,995,092.47 100.00 296,391,934.93 76.91 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL .358 4.986 381,162,869.51 100.00 385,559,711.97 100.00 — --- —^ - - --- --- —A - — ---- — Report m: GL8013 Asset Detail Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSGO0010000 12/31/2003 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL -----.__— .-- - -------- --- — Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base U.S. DOLLAR -� CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS INTEREST RECEIVABLE 4,018,799.39 4,018,799.39 0.84% 0.00 RECEIVABLE FOR INVESTMENTS 37,282.95 37,282.95 0.01% 0.00 SOLD PAYABLE FOR INVESTMENTS -2,568,906.25 -2,568,906.25 -0.54% 0.00 PURCHASED EUROPEAN INVEST 99.7321 900,0-00.000 897,588.50 897,588.50 0.190/0 0.00 DISC03/15/2004SECID: 29878RCF3 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 99.8681 5,200,0-00.000 5,193,143.22 5,193,143.22 1.09% 0.00 NMAT 02/04/2004SEC ID: 313384SRI FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS 99.6879 1,000,0.00.000 996,879.16 996,879.16 0.21% 0.00 DISCSEC ID: 313384SS9 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS 99.6136 600,0-00.000 597,681.67 597,681.67 0.12% 0.00 DISCMAT 02/09/2004SEC ID: 313384SWO FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS 99.7321 2,000,0-00.000 1,994,641.11 1,994,641.11 0.42% 0.00 DISCMAT 02/25/2004SEC ID: 313384TN9 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 99.7421 4,500,000.000 4,488,395.00 4,488,395.00 0.94% 0.00 NMAT 03/12/2004SEC ID: 313384UE7 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CINS 99.4625 900,000.000 895,162.50 895,162.50 0.190/0 0.00 DISCMAT 03/17/2004SEC ID: 313384UK3 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS 99.4313 2,000,0-00.000 1,988,625.00 1,988,625.00 0.42% 0.00 DISCMAT 05/19/2004SEC ID: 313384XA2 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.7308 20,800,0-00.000 20,744,004.66 20,744,004.66 4.34% 0.00 DISCMAT 01/15/2004SEC ID: 313396RV7 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.9065 5,200,G00.000 5,195,138.00 5,195,138.00 1.090/0 0.00 DISCMAT 01/21/2004SEC ID: 313396SBO FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.7266 1,200,0-00.000 1,196,718.67 1,196,718.67 0.25% 0.00 DISCMAT 01/29/2004SEC ID: 313396SKO 1 Workbench !Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.6614 4,700,0-00.000 4,684,085.28 4,684,085.28 0.98% 0.00 DISCMAT 02/02/2004SEC ID: 313396SP9 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.7240 2,500,0,00.000 2,493,100.00 2,493,100.00 0.52% 0.00 DISCMAT 02/12/2004SEC ID: 313396SZ7 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.7602 6,000,000.000 5,985,610.83 5,985,610.83 1.25% 0.00 DISCMAT 02/26/2004SEC ID: 313396TP8 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.5807 2,100,000.000 2,091,194.00 2,091,194.00 0.44% 0.00 DISCMAT 03/22/2004SEC ID: 313396UQ4 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORI' 99.4225 3,800,000.000 3,778,055.00 3,778,055.00 0.790/a 0.00 DISCMAT 03/31/2004SEC ID: 313396UZ4 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 99.8713 5,200,000.000 5,193,305.00 5,193,305.00 1.090/0 0.00 NTMAT 02/02/2004SEC 1D: 313588SPI FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.9000 400,000.000 399,600.00 399,600.00 0.08% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 02/04/2004SEC ID: 313588SR7 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 99.7820 8,400,0-00.000 8,380,074.22 8,380,074.22 1.75% 0-00 NTSEC ID: 313588TF2 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.5530 3,800,000.000 3,783,014.00 3,783,014.00 0.79% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 02/19/2004SEC ID: 313588TGO FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.7450 8,400,0-00.000 8,378,580.00 8,378,580.00 1.75% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 02/25/2004SEC ID:313588TN5 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.7270 400,000.000 398,908.00 398,908.00 0.08% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 03/03/2004SEC ID: 313588TV7 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.7350 1,000,000.000 997,350.00 997,350.00 0.21% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 03/10/2004SEC ID: 313588UC7 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCSEC 99.7346 1,100,000.000 1,097,080.42 1,097,080.42 0.23% 0.00 ID: 313588UK9 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.4262 2,000,000.000 1,988,523.89 1,988,523.89 0.42% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 05/19/2004SEC ID: 313588XA8 — - ---- ----- — --- --- 2 Workbench --�- ----- --' Asset Detail - - ---- Report ID: GL8013 '- Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSCT00010000 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base GENERAL ELEC CAP 99.6331 1,800,000.000 1,793,395.50 1,793,395.50 0.38% 0.00 DISC04/07/2004SECID: 36959HD79 U S TREASURY BILLDUE 99.5160 5,700,000.000 5,672,410.42 5,672,410.42 1.19% 0.00 02/12/2004 DD 08/14/2003SEC ID: 912795PK1 U S TREASURY BILL 0.000% 99.7575 9,200,000.000 9,177,690.00 9,177,690.00 1.92% 0.00 03/11/2004 DD 09/11/03SEC ID: 912795PPO U S TREASURY BILL 0.000% 99.7853 6,500,000.000 6,486,041.25 6,486,041.25 1.36% 0.00 03/18/2004 DD 09/18/03SEC ID: 912795PQ8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 99.4870 17,000,000.000 16,912,790.02 16,912,790.02 3.54% 0.00 BILLDUE 04/22/2004 DD 10/23/03SEC ID: 912795PV7 U S TREASURY BILL 0.000% 99.4843 12,000,000.000 11,938,120.00 11,938,120.00 2.50% 0.00 04/29/2004 DD 10/30/03SEC ID: 912795PW5 U S TREASURY BILL 0.000% 99.4820 4,400,000.000 4,377,207.88 4,377,207.88 0.92% 0.00 05/06/2004 DD 11/06/03SEC ID: 912795PX3 U S TREASURY BILLDUE 99.4906 6,200,0-00.000 6,168,416.07 6,168,416.07 1.29% 0.00 05/27/2004 DD 11/28/2003SEC ID: 912795QA2 WELLS FARGO BANK NA INSTL C/D 100.0000 1,500,0.00.000 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 0.31% 0.00 1.0709/601/13/2004 DD 12/10/03SEC ID: 94975U2V8 CREDIT SUISSE FB REP000.970% 100.0000 8,400,0,00.000 8,400,000.00 8,400,000.00 1.76% 0.00 01/02/2004 DD 12/24/03SEC ID: 99414G593 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH 100.0000 272,745.910 272,745.91 272,745.91 0.06% 0.00 MGMTSEC ID:996085247 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 167,072,745.910 168,022,451.27 168,022,451.27 35.14% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES AIG SUNAMERICA GLOBAL REG S 5. 109.8670 752,000.000 826,199.84 826,199.84 0.17% 0.00 8500/.08/01/2008 DD 08/08/01SEC ID: U00907AAO COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6. 103.3430 2,500,000.000 2,568,906.25 2,583,575.00 0.54% 14,668.75 000%01/01/2034 DD 01/01/04SEC ID: 0IF060618 3 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD-CON Exchange Rate:SOLIDATED-OCSG0O01O00O 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL ---- --- -- �_ Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base ALLSTATE CORP SR N77.875% 107.8750 1,600,0-00.000 1,594,032.00 1,726,000.00 0.36% 131,968.00 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/OOSEC ID: 020002AL5 ASSOCIATES CORP NA MTN 103.4370 100,000.000 104,199.00 103,437.00 0.02% -762.00 SR00043 7.920%07/13/2004 DD 07/13/94SEC ID:045906BU7 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH AMERS. 101.3430 1,000,0.00.000 1,041,290.00 1,013,430.00 0.21% -27,860.00 800%04/20/2004 DD 04/20/99SEC ID:046003KA6 BANK OF AMERICA CORP SR GBL 102.3900 500,0,00.000 518,385.00 511,950.00 0.11% -6,435.00 NT6.625%06/15/2004 DD 06/15/99SEC ID:066050CW3 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INCS. 100.3280 650,0-00.000 677,046.50 652,132.00 0.14% -24,914.50 875%02/01/2004 DD 02/01/94SEC ID: 077858AA6 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT 5.500% 107.0620 1,500,000.000 1,527,135.00 1,605,930.00 0.34% 78,795.00 11/30/2007 DD 12/02/02SEC ID: 125581AD0 CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB NTS. 105.5620 5,000,0'00.000 5,333,600.00 5,278,100.00 1.100/0 -55,500.00 625%O8/27/2012 DD 08/26/02SEC ID: 172967BP5 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LNS INC NT6. 102.3900 2,500,0-00.000 2,498,400.00 2,559,750.00 0.54% 61,350.00 850%06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99SEC ID: 22237UAB8 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE N000- 102.4707 945,920.020 925,375.83 969,290.77 0.20% 43,914.94 111507.5009/6 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99SEC ID: 302998GE3 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 7.500% 102.0553 79,205.450 81,210.35 80,833.39 0.02% -376.96 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99SEC ID: 3128DBMA2 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS7. 106.2097 7,500,0,00.000 7,997,625.00 7,965,729.75 1.67% -31,895.25 125%02/15/2005 DD 02/08/OOSEC ID:3133MAUN7 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 101.7170 1,088,725,740 1,089,885.64 1,107,419.16 0.23% 17,533.52 AVAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SEC ID:3133TCE95 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 104.8970 3,017,014.630 2,860,874.69 3,164,757.84 0.66% 303,883.15 1620Z6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93SEC ID: 3133T17A4 4 Workbench Asset Detail Y Report m: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCS000010000 12/31/2003 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS 100.2634 1,350,000.000 1,399,963.50 1,353,555.90 0.28% -46,407.60 SYSTE6.40%01/23/2004 DD 01/O1/1999SEC ID:31331H6G7 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 100.7472 1,100,0-00.000 1,125,905.00 1,108,219.53 0.23% -17,685.47 3.750%04/15/2004 DD 04/15/02SEC ID: 3134A4PH I FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 6.384% 103.4282 79,116.270 77,187.80 81,828.53 0.02% 4,640.73 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97SEC ID: 31348SWZ3 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSNDEBS5. 100.4646 4,200,000.000 4,350,168.00 4,219,514.88 0.88% -130,653.12 1251/1.02/13/2004 DD 02/08/99SEC ID: 31359MEM 1 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS6. 114.2262 2,100,000.000 2,030,133.00 2,398,750.83 0.50% 368,617.83 625%09/15/2009 DD 09/01199SEC ID:31359MEYS FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS7. 106.2611 15,500,000.000 16,154,410.00 16,470,476.70 3.44% 316,066.70 125%02/15/2005 DD 02/14/OOSEC ID:31359MFH 1 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS5. 106.9384 11,350,000.000 11,521,271.50 12,137,508.40 2.54% 616,236.90 250%06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01SEC ID:31359MJX2 FNMA POOL 40254510 5.000% 102.3047 845,763.780 871,136.70 865,256.01 0.18% -5,880.69 11/01/2017 DD 10/01/02SECID: 31371KVB4 FNMA POOL#02546315.000% 102.1797 178,775.180 184,138.44 182,671.92 0.04% -1,466.52 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03SEC ID: 31371KY47 FNMA POOL#0254760 5.000% 102.1797 161,395.170 166,237.02 164,913.08 0.03% -1,323.94 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31371K5V9 FNMA POOL#0254866 5.000% 102.1797 70,264.770 72,372.72 71,796.32 0.02% -576.40 09/01/2018 DD 08/01/03SEC ID: 31371LCB3 FNMA POOL#0254953 5.000% 102.1797 372,934.600 377,712.83 381,063.42 0.080/0 3,350.59 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SECID: 31371LE21 FNMA POOL#0254987 5.000% 102.2200 994,777.040 1,007,522.61 1,016,861.01 0.21% 9,338.40 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31371LF46 5 Workbench Asset Detail Report 1D: GL8O13 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD•CONSOUDATED-OCSG000 1O00O 12/31/2003 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0323980 6.000% 105.3711 212.582.990 221,949.93 224,001.01 0.05% 2,051.08 04/01/2014 DD 09/01/99SEC ID: 31374T2M0 FNMA POOL#0357328 5.000% 102.2417 32,605.470 33,583.63 33,336.40 0.01% -247.23 O1/01/2018 DD O1/01/03SEC ID: 31376J4M8 FNMA POOL#0357430 5.000% 102.1797 1,607,651.670 1,625,737.76 1,642,693.49 0.34% 16,955.73 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31376KA71 FNMA POOL 90456482 6.000% 105.3711 65,8.50.210 68,751.73 69,387.08 0.01% 635.35 02/01/2014 DD 02/01/99SEC ID: 31381CCT2 FNMA POOL#0509649 6.000% 105.3711 176,700.550 184,486.42 186,191.30 0.04% 1,704.88 09/01/2014 DD 09/01/99SEC ID: 31383QEW0 FNMA POOL#0535451 6.000% 105.3711 167,522.680 174,904.15 176,520.47 0.04% 1,616.32 06/01/2015 DD 07/01/OOSECID: 31384VZQ8 FNMA POOL#0535672 6.000% 105.3711 3,639,256.330 3,799,611.07 3,834,724.06 0.80% 35,112.99 O1/01/2016 DD 12/01/OOSECID: 31384WCH 1 FNMA POOL#0545296 6.000% 105.3211 1,204,979.340 1,258,073.74 1,269,097.38 0.27% 11,023.64 11/01/2016 DD 10/01/01SEC ID: 31385HXZ0 FNMA POOL#0545580 6.000% 105.2836 101,480.300 105,951.77 106,842.10 0.02% 890.33 03/01/2017 DD 03/01/02SEC ID: 31385JCR7 FNMA POOL#0555101 6.000% 105.4211 179,016.370 186,904.26 188,721.01 0.04% 1,816.75 10/01/2017 DD 11/01/02SECID: 31385WU23 FNMA POOL#0555285 6.000% 103.5234 804,067.430 836,230.14 832,398.26 0.17% -3,831.88 03/01/2033 DD 02/01/03SEC ID: 31385W2S7 FNMA POOL#0555363 5.000% 102.1797 385,706.070 397,277.25 394,113.27 0.08% -3,163.98 04/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31385W5Y1 FNMA POOL#0555453 5.000% 102.1797 39,573.600 40,080.64 40,436.18 0.01% 355.54 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03SEC ID: 31385XBW6 6 Workbench _ _-- -- -------------_-__ .- _---- -Asset Detail Report ID: (iL8013 . Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD.CONSOLIDATED-OCSGO0010000 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0555528 6.000% 103.5234 773,260.110 804,190.52 800,505.47 0.17% -3,685.05 04/01/2033 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31385XD95 FNMA POOL 40555545 5.000% 102.1797 321,924.570 331,582.31 328,941.53 0.07% -2,640.78 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31385XES2 FNMA POOL#0555621 5.000% 102.2200 1,116,156.410 1,128,713.17 1,140,934.99 0.24% 12,221.82 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SECID: 31385XG68 FNMA POOL#0576386 6.000% 104.9188 65,121.390 67,990.80 68,324.61 0.01% 333.81 05/01/2016 DD 05/0 1/0 1 SEC ID: 31386XJ72 FNMA POOL#0576739 6.0000/6 105.2836 175,110.780 182,826.60 184,362.92 0,04% 1,536.32 04/01/2016 DD 04/01/01SECID: 31386XV86 FNMA POOL#0580888 6.000% 105.3086 234,439.670 244,769.66 246,885.11 0.05% 2,115.45 05/01/2016 DD 05/0 1/0 1 SEC ID: 31387DJ91 FNMA POOL#0594002 6.000% 105.1211 185,028.000 193,180.79 194,503.45 0.04% 1,322.66 07/01/2016 DD 07/01/01SECID: 31387T3K8 FNMA POOL#0597376 6.000% 105.2836 254,514.470 265,729.01 267,961.97 0.06% 2,232.96 09/01/2016 DD 08/01/01SECID: 31387XT96 FNMA POOL#0605259 6.000% 105.2836 165,183.410 172,461.80 173,911.02 0.04% 1,449.22 09/01/2016 DD 09/01/01SEC ID: 31388HMG 1 FNMA POOL#0608366 6.000% 105.2836 103,238.980 107,787.95 108,693.70 0.02% 905.75 10/01/2016 DD 09/01/01SEC ID: 31388LZ78 FNMA POOL#0616734 6.000% 105.4336 170,576.060 178,092.06 179,844.46 0.04% 1,752.40 12/01/2016 DD 12/01/01SEC ID: 31388WEF9 FNMA POOL#0630812 6.000% 104.9457 201,682.550 210,569.19 211,657.21 0.04% 1,088.02 02/01/2017 DD 02/01/02SEC ID: 31389NYH2 FNMA POOL#0632376 6.000% 105.4211 849,074.670 886,487.04 895,103.77 0.19% 8,616.73 07/01/2017 DD 07/01/02SECID: 31389QQ50 7 Workbench - --------- - --_ Asset Detail -- --� Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLMATED-OCSG00010000 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL -- -------- — ---—--- --— ---- --- — Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0653116 6.000% 105.4211 486,161.900 507,583.41 512,517.17 0.11% 4,933.76 07/01/2017 DD 07/01/02SEC ID: 31390QSD8 FNMA POOL#0673280 6.000% 105.1211 195,677.540 204,299.58 205,698.36 0.04% 1,398.78 08/01/2017 DD 11/01/02SEC ID: 31391P6R2 FNMA POOL#0681309 5.000% 102.1797 577,250.590 594,568.10 589,832.86 0.12% -4,735.24 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03SEC ID: 31391Y3S4 FNMA POOL#0681334 5.000% 102.1797 72,721.520 74,903.16 74,306.62 0.02% -596.54 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03SEC ID: 31391Y4T1 FNMA POOL#0684908 5.000% 102.2797 354,327.350 358,867.17 362,404.92 0.080/0 3,537.75 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SECID: 31400D3R1 FNMA POOL#0685200 5.000% 102.1797 207,000.260 209,652.45 211,512.22 0.04% 1,859.77 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31400EGH7 FNMA POOL#0685665 5.000% 102.1797 36,851.840 37,957.40 37,655.10 0.01% -302.30 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03SEC ID: 31400EW22 FNMA POOL#0686318 5.000% 102.1797 315,693.660 325,164.47 322,574.80 0.07% -2,589.67 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31400FPB7 FNMA POOL#0688739 5.000% 102.1797 124,019.730 127,740.32 126,722.98 0.03% -1,017.34 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31400JEL9 FNMA POOL#0689859 5.000% 102.1797 127,379.920 129,011.97 130,156.41 0.03% 1,144.44 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SECID: 31400KMG8 FNMA POOL#0693834 5.000% 102.3047 751,602.570 774,150.65 768,924.68 0.16% -5,225.97 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SECID: 3140OPY74 FNMA POOL#0695852 5.000% 102.1797 274,843.040 283,088.33 280,833.77 0.06% -2,254.56 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31400SBVO FNMA POOL#0695889 5.000% 102.1797 840,680.930 865,901.35 859,005.17 0.180/0 -6,896.18 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31400SC23 8 Workbench - -------------- -- -- ---Asset Detail --- --- - Report ID: GLso><a ' Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD.CONSOLTDATED-OCSGO0010000 12/31/2003 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL __.._�_—.___ ------.__--- -----_..----------- Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0697026 5.000% 102.1797 27,089.430 27,902.13 27,679.90 0.01% -222.23 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03SECID: 31400TLF2 FNMA POOL#0698939 6.000% 105.4336 91,957.960 96,009.86 96,954.58 0.02% 944.72 09/01/2017 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31400VPY2 FNMA POOL#0702210 5.000% 102.2200 277,879.670 286,216.06 284,048.58 0.06% -2,167.48 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SECID: 31401ADP9 FNMA POOL#0702328 5.000% 102.1797 149,630.610 151,547.76 152,892.09 0.03% 1,344.33 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03SECID: 31401AHD2 FNMA POOL 00703195 6.00(r1c, 105.5596 82,358.610 85,987.54 86,936.59 0.02% 949.05 01/01/2017 DD 04/01/03SFC 11): 31401BGC3 FNMA POOL#0709148 5.0000/6 102.1797 302,649.050 31 1,728.52 309,245.86 0.06% -2,482.66 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SECID: 31401HZM7 FNMA POOL#0709360 5.000% 102.1797 698,961.000 707,916.44 714,196.18 0.150/0 6,279.74 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SECID: 31401JB56 FNMA POOL#0709826 5.000% 102.1797 145,426.990 147,290.27 148,596.85 0.03% 1,306.58 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401JSP4 FNMA POOL#0709917 5.000% 102.1797 265,628.290 269,031.65 271,418.16 0.06% 2,386.51 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SECID: 31401JVJ4 FNMA POOL#0709963 5.000% 102.2200 27,155.100 27,503.03 27,757.94 0.01% 254.91 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SECID: 31401JWYO FNMA POOL#0710235 5.000% 102.1797 807,079.030 831,291.41 824,670.85 0.17% -6,620.56 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SECID: 31401KBC8 FNMA POOL#0713344 5.000% 102.1797 25,900.140 26,574.14 26,362.50 0.01% -211.64 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401UP52 FNMA POOL#0713365 5.000% 102.1797 336,717.670 341,031.86 344,057.07 0.07% 3,025.21 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03SEC ID: 31401NQS1 9 Workbench Asset Detail A- _ Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/31/2003 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL ------------ --- --- -- ----i-- Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0720319 5.000% 102.1797 992,167.210 1,004,879.35 1,013,793.38 0.21% 8,914.03 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03SECID: 31401 WG45 FNMA POOL#0720369 5.000% 102.2200 2,439,536.980 2,512,723.09 2,493,694.51 0.52% -19,028.58 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401 WJNO FNMA POOL#0721629 5.0000/6 102.3047 315,691.370 325,162.12 322,967.08 0.07% -2,195.04 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401XVW4 FNMA POOL#0723487 5.000% 102.1797 253,209.800 256,058.41 258,728.99 0.05% 2,670.58 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SECID: 31402AXQ4 FNMA POOL#0729601 5.000% 102.1797 430,8.32.160 436,352.20 440,222.97 0.09% 3,870.77 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03SEC ID: 31402HRW3 FNMA POOL#0732873 5.0000/6 102.4047 36,5,80.960 37,049.65 37,460.62 0.01% 410.97 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402MFN5 FNMA POOL#0737130 5.0009/6 102.1797 751,447.780 761,075.70 767,827.01 0.16% 6,751.31 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402S4P9 FNMA POOL#0738211 5.000% 102.2200 592,771.450 600,366.34 605,930.93 0.13% 5,564.59 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402UDQ2 FNMA POOL#0738487 5.000% 102.1797 225,351.960 228,239.28 230,263.93 0.050/6 2,024.65 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402UNC2 FNMA POOL#0740471 5.000% 102.2200 700,464.060 709,438.75 716,014.31 0.150/0 6,575.56 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402WT40 FNMA POOL#0740748 5.000% 102.1797 830,872.680 841,518.23 848,983.13 0.180/0 7,464.90 10/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31402W5H7 FNMA POOL#0744008 5.000% 102.1797 1,183,643.760 1,198,809.19 1,209,443.52 0.25% 10,634.33 07/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31403BR54 FNMA POOL#0744316 5.000% 102.2200 175,&43.140 178,096.13 179,746.84 0.040/6 1,650.71 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31403B3Z4 10 Workbench. -— --- ---. _—— - —Asset Detail- -- ------- ----- Report ID: GL8013 ' Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency:. OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/31/2003 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL -- ---- --------------- --- -- -- --- --------- — — Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0747914 5.000% 102.1797 362,925.280 367,575.26 370,835.93 0.08% 3,260.67 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403F3X0 FNMA POOL 90748400 5.000% 102.2200 244,330.370 247,460.86 249,754.48 0.050/0 2,293.62 08/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31403GNR9 FNMA POOL#0748899 5.000% 102.1214 1,039,682.540 1,053,003.47 1,061,738.36 0.22% 8,734.89 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403G7L0 FNMA POOL#0750377 5.000% 102.1214 2,550,466.670 2,583,144.52 2,604,572.24 0.54% 21,427.72 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403JUA2 FNMA POOL#0750380 5.000% 102.1214 2,138,225.970 2,165,622.00 2,183,586.27 0.46% 17,964.27 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403JUD6 FNMA POOL#0750445 5.000% 102.1214 194,148.320 196,635.84 198,266.98 0.04% 1,631.14 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403JWE2 FNMA POOL#0751960 5.000% 102.2200 914,095.830 925,807.69 934,388.68 0.20% 8.580.99 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403LMHI FNMA POOL#0753425 5.000% 102.1797 995,372.460 1,006,881.45 1,017,068.49 0.21% 10,187.04 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403NA23 FNMA POOL 00755165 5.000% 102.1797 653,9-24.600 662,303.00 668,178.13 0.14% 5,875,13 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SECID: 31403Q6A3 FNMA POOL#0756372 5.0000/6 102.1797 995,525.560 1,007,036.32 1,017,224.93 0.21% 10,188.61 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403SJR8 FNMA POOL#0765165 5.000% 101.2813 45,596.000 46,180.20 46,180.20 0.01% 0.00 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31404DCA4 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT6.750% 104.8120 1,000,000.000 965,170.00 1,048,120.00 0.22% 82,950.00 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93SECID: 345397GV9 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL 102.5620 2-500,000.000 2,495,900.00 2,564,050.00 0.54% 68,150.00 LANDMARK6.7000/.07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99SEC ID:345397SJ3 11 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD•CONSOLIDATED-OCS000010000 _ 12/31/2003 _ Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base _ Base Total - Base GNMA POOL#i0596612 6.500% 105.6602 336,975,860 353,666.69 356,049.23 0.07% 2,382.54 09/15/2032 DD 09/01/02SECID: 36200BYH4 GNMA POOL#0569358 6.500% 105.5073 1,220,097.300 1,248,693.33 1,287,291.21 0.27% 38,597.88 04/15/2032 DD 04/01/02SEC ID: 36200QQK3 GNMA POOL#10569685 6.500% 105.6914 53,160.940 55,794.06 56,186.55 0.01% 392.49 02/15/2032 DD 02/01/02SECID: 3620002S2 GNMA POOL##0570019 6.500% 105.6602 90,472.270 94,953.48 95,593.15 0.02% 639.67 07/15/2032 DD 07/01/02SEC ID: 3620ORG48 GNMA POOL#0574323 6.500% 105.6914 558,690.440 586,363.08 590,487.80 0.12% 4,124.72 12/15/2031 DD 12/01/01SECID: 36200WAY7 GNMA POOL 40575364 6.500% 105.6914 59,181.880 62,113.23 62,550.16 0.01% 436.93 11/15/2031 DD 11/01/01SEC ID: 36200XFD6 GNMA POOL 40587117 6.500% 105.6914 21,553.910 22,621.50 22,780.63 0,000/0 159.13 06/15/2032 DD 06/01/02SEC ID: 36201MG22 GNMA POOL#i0587439 6.500% 105.6602 65,141.430 68,367.96 68,828.54 0.01% 460.58 11/15/2032 DD 12/01/02SEC ID: 36201 MS45 GNMA POOL#0421389 6.500% 106.0352 14,938.650 15,678.59 15,840.22 0.000/0 161.63 04/15/2026 DD 04/01/96SECID: 36206UC23 GNMA POOL##0438057 6.000% 104.3984 29,383.160 27,891.06 30,675.56 0.01% 2,784.50 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98SEC ID: 36207PTN9 GNMA POOL#0449851 6.500% 105.6107 24,972.910 26,209.85 26,374.06 0.01% 164.21 01/15/2028 DD 01/01/98SEC ID: 36208FWLO GNMA POOL##0457814 6.000% 104.3984 38,349.790 36,402.33 40,036.58 0.01% 3,634.25 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 36208QSB3 GNMA POOL#0465546 6.000% 104.3984 459,044.750 435,733.89 479,235,56 0.10% 43,501.67 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98SEC ID: 36209AET3 12 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 ' Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/31/2003 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL -- - --- ----- - -- ---- - - - Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base GNMA POOL#0465555 6.000% 104.3984 494,398.160 469,292.01 516,143.97 0.11% 46,851.96 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98SEC ID: 36209AE48 GNMA POOL#0466845 6.500% 105.9102 67,365.960 70,702.68 71,347.40 0.01% 644.72 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98SEC ID: 36209BTA6 GNMA POOL#0467279 6.000% 104.3984 22,840.650 21,680.78 23,845.28 0.00% 2,164.50 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 36209CCQ7 GNMA POOL#0467286 6.000% 104.3984 398,071.700 377,857.12 415,580.64 0.090/0 37,723.52 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 36209CCX2 GNMA POOL#0468052 6.50(r,6 105.9102 260,930.320 273,854.52 276,351.72 0.06% 2,497.20 07/15/2028 DD 07/01/98SEC IU: 36209C5M4 GNMA POOL#0468330 6.000"/a 104.3984 18,872.200 17,913.83 19,702.28 0.000/0 1,788.45 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98SEC ID: 36209DHF4 GNMA POOL#0468339 6.000% 104.3984 320,988.060 304,592.98 335,002.13 0.07% 30,409.15 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98SEC ID: 36209DHQ0 GNMA POOL#0469688 6.000% 104.3984 16,366.700 15,535.57 17,086.58 0.000/0 1,551.01 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/98SEC ID: 36209EXR8 GNMA POOL#0476041 6.500% 105.9102 212,869.160 223,080.23 225,450.07 0.050/0 2,369.84 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98SEC ID: 36209MZE7 GNMA POOL#0478626 6.500% 105.8164 164,280.070 172,160.38 173,835.27 0.04% 1,674.89 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99SEC ID: 36209QVT9 GNMA POOL#0480598 6.500% 105.9102 169,313,940 177,435.73 179,320.66 0.04% 1,884.93 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 36209S3F6 GNMA POOL#0483452 6.000% 104.3984 13,190.470 12,520.65 13,770.64 0.000/0 1,249.99 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98SEC ID: 36209WBV3 GNMA POOL#0485527 6.500% 105.6914 460,065.960 482,853.60 486,250.20 0.100/0 3,396.60 06/15/2031 DD 06/01/01SEC ID: 36209YLG1 13 Workbench Asset Detail Report m: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD•CONSOLIDATED-0CSCT00010000 12/31/2003 Fbcchange Rate: Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base GNMA POOL#0485610 6.500% 105.6914 519,423.750 545,151.46 548,986.29 0.11% 3,834.83 07/15/2031 DO 07/01/01 SEC ID: 36209YN38 GNMA POOL 40485682 6.500% 105.6914 105,649.630 110,882.59 111,662.58 0.020/6 779.99 08/15/2031 DD 08/01/01SECID: 36209YRB6 GNMA POOL#0485703 6.500% 105.6914 100,873.490 105,869.89 106,614.61 0.02% 744.72 08/15/2031 DD 08/01/01SEC ID: 36209YRY6 GNMA POOL#0486720 6.000% 104.3984 12,287.360 11,663.40 12,827.81 0.000/0 1,164.41 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98SEC ID: 36210AVM6 GNMA POOL#0491103 6.000% 104.3984 107,847.980 102,371.34 112,591.61 0.02% 10,220.27 01/15/2029 DD 0 1/0 1/99SEC ID: 36210FRY4 GNMA POOL#0496461 6.000% 104.3984 440,8.36.950 418,450.69 460,226.90 0.10% 41,776.21 01/15/2029 DD 01/0 1/99SEC ID: 36210MQN4 GNMA POOL 40497343 6.000% 104.3984 23,358.260 22,172.10 24,385.66 0.01% 2,213.56 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98SEC ID: 36210NP45 GNMA POOL#0499153 6.000% 104.3984 12,669.690 12,026.31 13,226.96 0.000/0 1,200.65 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/99SECID: 36210QQE5 GNMA POOL#0500917 6.000% 104.3984 7,327.030 6,954.95 7,649.31 0.000/0 694.36 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99SECID: 36210SPAO GNMA POOL#0503388 6.000% 104.3984 317,562.140 301,435.94 331,529.92 0.07% 30,093.98 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99SECID: 36210VF55 GNMA POOL#0506636 6.000% 104.3984 36,727.750 34,862.66 38,343.20 0.01% 3,480.54 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99SECID: 36210YY90 GNMA POOL#0512235 6.500% 105.8164 10,933.580 11,475.13 11,569.52 0.000/0 94.39 11/15/2029 DD 11/01/99SECID: 36211GBC6 GNMA POOL#0514326 6.500% 105.8164 167,769.610 175,817.30 177,527.78 0.04% 1,710.48 07/15/2029 DD 07/01/99SECID: 36211JLF2 14 Workbench Asset Detail Report m: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG0001O00O 12/31/2003 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shales Par Base Base Total Base GNMA POOL#0530053 6.500% 105.4968 51,641.650 54,199.53 54,480.31 0.01% 280.78 04/15/2031 DD 04/01/01SEC ID: 36212CZS3 GNMA POOL#0537885 6.500% 105.6914 105,041.920 110,244.77 111,020.29 0.02% 775.52 02/15/2031 DD 02/01/01SEC ID: 36212MREI GNMA POOL#0547512 6.500% 105.6914 13,368.710 14,030.88 14,129.58 0.000/0 98.70 04/15/2031 DD 04/01/O1SEC ID: 36212YGV9 GNMA POOL#0547715 6.500% 105.6914 128,337.460 134,493.65 135,641.67 0.03% 1,148.02 02/15/2031 DD 02/01/01SEC ID: 36212YN82 GNMA POOL#0552322 6.500% 105.6914 77,723.070 81,572.79 82,146.61 0.02% 573.82 O1/15/2032 DD O1/01/02SEC ID: 36213ESK3 GNMA POOL#0552466 6.500% 105.5073 595,133.470 624,611.18 627,909.01 0.13% 3,297.83 03/15/2032 DD 03/01/02SEC ID: 36213EW36 GNMA POOL#0552659 6.500% 105.6914 457,133.870 479,776.27 483,151.23 0.100/0 3,374.96 07/15/2032 DD 07/01/02SEC ID: 36213E5U6 GNMA POOL#0561017 6.500% 105.6914 457,984.660 480,669.21 484,050.44 0.100/0 3,381.23 07/15/2031 DD 07/01/01SEC ID: 36213QG29 GNMA II POOL#0080023VAR RT 102.6822 229,651.390 233,454.99 235,811.10 0.05% 2,356.11 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96SEC ID: 36225CAZ9 GNMA II POOL#080088M 7.375% 101.8592 330,186.280 337,409.10 336,325.10 0.07% -1,084.00 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97SEC ID: 36225CC20 GNMA II POOL#0080395VAR RT 101.1414 276,925.690 274,416.05 280,086.52 0.06% 5,670.47 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/OOSEC ID: 36225CNM4 GNMA II POOL#080408X 6.500% 101.0885 2.477,095.700 2,451,937.69 2,504,058.89 0.52% 52,121.20 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/OOSEC ID: 36225CN28 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN#TR 101.9530 180,000.000 183,801.60 183,515.40 0.04% -286.20 004487.250%05/03/2004 DD 05/01/OOSEC ID: 36962GUR3 15 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN#TR 100.0780 1,000,0-00.000 1,001,089.00 1,000,780.00 0.21% -309,00 00545VAR RT 05/20/2004 DD 05/20/02SEC ID: 36962GYS7 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN#TR 104.0310 5,000,000.000 5,203,500.00 5,201,550.00 1.090/0 -1,950.00 00575 5.450%01/15/2013 DD 12/06/02SEC ID: 36962GZY3 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR NT 107.4060 3,000,000.000 3,064,350.00 3,222,180.00 0.67% 157,830.00 6.125%08/28/2007 DD 08/29/02SEC ID: 370425SD3 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC SR NT 102.5310 3,000,000.000 3,030,030.00 3,075,930.00 0.64% 45,900.00 4.125%O1/15/2008 DD 01/13/03SEC ID: 38141GCSI GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 100.6810 725,638.940 725,638.94 730,580.54 0.15% 4,941.60 FHVAR RT 02/16/2030SEC ID: 3837H4NX9 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 6.375% 110.1250 1,635,000.000 1,772,820.00 1,800,543.75 0.38% 27,723.75 10/15/2011 DD 10/23/01SEC ID: 441812JW5 JP MORGAN CHASE&CO SUB NT5. 105.4530 3 000,000.000 3,127,260.00 3,163,590.00 0.66% 36,330.00 750%01/02/2013 DD 11/25/02SEC ID:46625HAT7 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS INC6.625% 101.3120 1,000,0-00.000 1,045,590.00 1,013,120.00 0.21% -32,470.00 04/01/2004 DD 03/26/99SEC ID: 524908BZ2 MARSH&MCLENNAN COS INC SR 102.2960 2,000,000.000 1,992,280.00 2,045,920.00 0.43% 53,640.00 NT6.625%06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99SEC ID: 571748AB8 MORGAN STANLEY NT 3.625% 100.1400 3,200,000.000 3,195,648.00 3,204,480.00 0.67% 8,832.00 04/01/2008 DD 03/06/03SEC ID: 617446HW2 NCNB TEX NAIL BK DALLAS TEX 103.2180 250,000.000 260,870.00 258,045.00 0.050/0 -2,825.00 NT 9.5000/.06/01/2004 DD 06/01/89SEC ID: 628857DJO NATIONAL RURAL UTILS COOP FIN 116.5150 3;000,000.000 3,465,480.00 3,495,450.00 0.73% 29,970.00 7.250%03/01/2012 DD 03/07/02SEC ID:637432CU7 NATIONSBANK CORP SR NTS6.125% 102.5150 627,000.000 646,650.18 642,769.05 0.13% -3,881.13 07/15/2004 DD 07/23/98SECID: 638585BJ7 16 Workbench _--Asset Detail � Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency- USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCS000010000 12/31/2003 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base NORWEST FINL INC NTS7.200% 101.3900 520,000.000 531,538.80 527,228.00 0.11% -4,310.80 04/01/2004 DD 04/07/97SEC ID: 669383DG3 PACIFICORP SECD MTN#TR 00115 104.3590 3,000,000.000 2,950,530.00 3,130,770.00 0.65% 180,240.00 7.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92SEC ID:69512EEU5 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS 7. 101.0310 1,000,000.000 1,052,600.00 1,010,310.00 0.21% -42,290.00 500%04/01/2004 DD 04/01/97SEC ID: 718154CH8 RESIDENTIAL ASSET 03-RS11 99.8750 1,000,000.000 1,000,000.00 998,750.00 0.21% -1,250.00 AIIBVAR RT 12/25/2033 DD 12/30/03SEC ID: 760985K83 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 16. 108.6700 3,497,276.280 3,497,276.28 3,800,490.13 0.79% 303,213.85 340%03/01/2021SECID: 83162CLJO SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 01 106.2450 2,425,788.580 2,425,788.58 2,577,279.08 0.54% 151,490.50 6.640%02/10/2011 DD 02/21/OISEC ID:831641DD4 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1 C 6. 17.1820 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 274,912.00 0.06% -1,325,088.00 831%03/01/2010 DD 08/22/01SEC ID:909317BC2 US BANCORP MTN#TR 001196. 101.6710 1,000,DOO.000 1,046,310.00 1,016,710.00 0.21% -29,600.00 000%05/15/2004 DD 05/10/99SEC ID:91 159HEY2 U S TREASURY NOTES06.250% 111.5000 20,000,P00.000 22,620,312.50 22,300,000.00 4.66% -320,312.50 02/15/2007 DD 02/15/97SECID: 9128272JO US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 108.3750 16,347,940.000 14,422,710.98 17,717,079.98 3.71% 3,294,369.00 NT 3.375%01/15/2007 DD 0 1/15/97SEC ID:9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 110.6250 3,435,480.000 3,746,156.05 3,800,499.75 0.79% 54,343.70 3.6250/.01/15/2008 DD 0 l/15/98SEC ID:9128273T7 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 112.9690 14,665,170.000 16,296,705.73 16,567,095.90 3.46% 270,390.17 3.875%0 1/15/2009 DD 0 l/15/99SEC ID:9128274Y5 U S TREASURY NOTES05.750% 107.4065 57,100,000.000 62,782,901.47 61,329,111.50 12.83% -1,453,789.97 11/15/2005 DD 11/15/OOSEC ID: 9128276N7 17 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL __._�—..___ --- ------ - --- — Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base U S TREASURY NT 3.250% 100.6600 12,000,000.000 11,870,156.25 12,079,200.00 2.53% 209,043.75 08/15/2008 DD 08/15/03SEC ID: 912828BG4 VERIZON GLOBAL FDG CORP 115.8750 3,000,000.000 3,530,490.00 3,476,250.00 0.73% -54,240.00 GLOBAL 7.375%09/01/2012 DD 08/26/02SEC ID: 92344GAT3 VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR 01 SER A5. 107.0620 1,750,000.000 1,743,840.00 1,873,585.00 0.39% 129,745.00 750%03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01SEC ID: 927804ENO WELLS FARGO&CO NEW NT6.625% 102.7500 125,000.000 128,605.00 128,437.50 0.03% -167.50 07/15/2004 DD 07/28/99SECID: 949746AA9 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 293,172,649.570 306,056,504.05 310,124,779.19 64.86% 4,068,275.14 TOTAL ASSETS U.S.DOLLAR 460,245,395.480 474,078,955.32 478,147,230.46 100.00% 4,068,275.14 TOTAL ASSETS-BASE: 460,245,395.480 474,078,955.32 478,147,230.46 100.00% 4,068,275.14 18 Workbench. Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency USD OCSD-CONSOI IDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR U.S.DOLLAR CD RECD FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATORSEC ID: 12/11/2003 0.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 0.00 NA91234590CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO 12/11/2003 CD RECD FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATORSEC ID: 12/19/2003 0.000 26,300,000.00 26,300,000.00 0.00 NA91234590CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO 12/19/2003 TOTAL CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR U.S. DOLLAR 0.000 41,300,000.00 41,300,000.00 0.00 TOTAL CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 0.000 41,300,000.00 41,300,000.00 0.00 BASE: TOTAL RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS BASE: 0.000 41,300,000.00 41,300,000.00 0.00 PURCHASES CASH 86 CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR B EUROPEAN INVEST DISC 03/15/2004SEC ID:12/15/2003 99.7321 900,000.000 897,588.50 -897,588.50 0.00 29878RCF3BROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS 12/15/2003 INC, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- 12/15/2003 PIMCO B FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 12/19/2003 99.8681 5,200,000.000 5,193,143.22 -5,193,143.22 0.00 02/04/2004SEC ID: 313384SR 1 BROKER: 12/19/2003 GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NYOCSF07511102: 12/19/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 12/15/2003 99.7421 4,500,000.000 4,488,395.00 -4,488,395.00 0.00 03/12/2004SEC ID: 313384UE7BROKER: 12/15/2003 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 12/15/2003 NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 12/19/2003 99.9065 5,200,000.000 5,195,138.00 -5,195,138.00 0.00 01/21/2004SEC ID: 313396SBOBROKER: 12/19/2003 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/19/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: Ews009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSGO0010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base B FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 12/15/2003 99.7891 3,000,000.000 2,993,673.33 -2,993,673.33 0.00 02/26/2004SEC ID:313396TP8BROKER: 12/15/2003 UBS SECURITIES LLC,NEW 12/15/2003 YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT MAT 12/19/2003 99.8713 5,200,000.000 5,193,305.00 -5,193,305.00 0.00 02/02/2004SEC ID:313588SPIBROKER: 12/19/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/19/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 12/30/2003 99.9000 400,000.000 399,600.00 -399,600.00 0.00 02/04/2004SEC ID: 313588SR7BROKER: 12/30/2003 MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, 12/30/2003 NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTSEC 1D: 12/15/2003 99.8104 3,000,000.000 2,994,312.50 -2,994,312.50 0.00 313588TF2BROKER: CHASE SECURITIES, 12/15/2003 NEW YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/15/2003 PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 12/2/2003 99.7450 8,400,000.000 8,378,580.00 -8,378,580.00 0.00 02/25/2004SEC ID:313588TN5BROKER: 12/2/2003 BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC, SAN 12/2/2003 FRANCISCOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM B WM ALANTL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 12/3/2003 99.7270 400,000.000 398,908.00 -398,908.00 0.00 03/03/2004SEC ID: 313588TV7BROKER: 12/3/2003 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 12/3/2003 NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 12/11/2003 99.7350 1,000,000.000 997,350.00 -997,350.00 0.00 03/10/2004SEC ID: 313588UC7BROKER: 12/11/2003 BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 12 11/2003 FRANCISCOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM / B FMAtANTL MTG ASSN DISCSEC ID: 12/17/2003 99.7346 1,100,000.000 1,097,080.42 -1,097,080.42 0.00 313588UK9BROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS 12/17/2003 INC,NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- 12/17/2003 PIMCO B GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 04/07/2004SEC 12/10/2003 99.6331 1,800,000.000 1,793,395.50 -1,793,395.50 0.00 ID:36959HD79BROKER: CITIBANK CP IPA, 12/10/2003 NEW YORKOCSF07522202:LONG TERM 12/10/2003 OPER-PIMCO B U S TREASURY BILL DUE 03/11/2004 DTD 12/5/2003 99.7575 9,200,000.000 9,177,690.00 -9,177,690.00 0.00 09/11/2003SEC ID: 912795PPOBROKER: 12/5/2003 CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N 12/5/2003 YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL -- Trade Date ---_�--_--- - - Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base B U S TREASURY BILL 0.000%03/18/2004 DD 12/19/2003 99.7853 6,500,000.000 6,486,041.25 -6,486,041.25 0.00 09/18/03SEC ID: 912795PQ8BROKER: 12/19/2003 MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, 19/2003 NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12/19/2003 B U S TREASURY BILL DUE 05/27/2004 DD 12/1/2003 99.4934 1,900,000.000 1,890,375.39 -1,890,375.39 0.00 11/28/2003SEC ID:912795QA2BROKER: 12/1/2003 UBS SECURITIES LLC, NEW YORKOCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12/1/2003 B WELLS FARGO BANK NA INSTL C/D 1.070% 12/9/2003 100.0000 1,500,000,000 1,500,000.00 -1,500,000.00 0.00 01/13/2004 DD 12/10/03SECID: 12/10/2003 94975U2V8BROKER:WELLS FARGO 12/9/2003 BROKERAGE SVCS LLC, B `� 20 bI �fJPER- 12/1/2003 100.0000 3,000,000.000 3,000,000.00 -3,000,000.00 0.00 W/'2'003'DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 12/1/2003 99413G495BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/1/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID B RAHN9 '2 REPO 01.020%12/02/2003 12/1/2003 100.0000 8,600,000.000 8,600,000.00 -8,600,000.00 0.00 DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 99413G610BROKER: 12/1/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07522202: 12/1/2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.020% 12/02/2003 12/1/2003 100.0000 100,000,000 100,000.00 -100,000.00 0.00 DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 99413G610BROKER: 12/1/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102:12/1/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980% 12/2/2003 100.0000 4,000,000,000 4,000,000.00 -4,000,000.00 0.00 12/03/2003 DD 12/02/03SEC ID: 12/2/2003 99413H964BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12 2/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID / B eF&&F9ffiSE FB REPO 00.990% 12/3/2003 100.0000 4,000,000.000 4,000,000.00 -4,000,000.00 0.00 12/04/2003 DD 12/03/03SECID: 12/3/2003 99413J440BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/3/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID B E?RrX9v6R 2 REPO 00.980% 12/05/2003 12/4/2003 100.0000 4,000,000.000 4,000,000.00 -4,000,000.00 0.00 DD 12/04/03SEC ID: 99413L60 1 BROKER: 12/4/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/4/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.010% 12/11/2003 100.0000 7,500,000.000 7,500,000.00 -7,500,000.00 0.00 12/12/2003 DD 12/11/03SECID: 12/11/2003 99413T844BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/11/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3 Workbench Transaction Detail m Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 12/12/2003 12/11/2003 100.0000 7,500,000.000 7,500,000.00 -7,500,000.00 0.00 DD 12/11/03SEC ID:99413T919BROKER: 12/11/2003 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: 12/11/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.020% 12/15/2003 100.0000 4,500,000.000 4,500,000.00 -4,500,000.00 0.00 12/16/2003 DD 12/15/03SECID: 12/15/2003 99413W904BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/15/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID B LYAWXWCft 2 REPO 00.990% 12/17/2003 12/16/2003 100.0000 4,500,000,000 4,500,000.00 -4,500,000.00 0.00 DD 12/16/03SEC ID:99413Y355BROKER: 12/16/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/16/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 12/18/2003 12/17/2003 100.0000 4,500,000.000 4,500,000.00 -4,500,000.00 0.00 DD 12/17/03SEC ID:99413Z907BROKER: 12/17/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/17/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.010% 12/19/2003 12/18/2003 100.0000 4,400,000.000 4,400,000.00 -4,400,000.00 0.00 DD 12/18/03SEC ID:99414BI31BROKER: 12/18/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/18/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000% 12/19/2003 100.0000 4,500,000.000 4,500,000.00 -4,500,000.00 0.00 12/22/2003 DD 12/19/03SECID: 12/19/2003 9941413651BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/19/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID B WHrME '2 REPO 00.990% 12/22/2003 12/19/2003 100.0000 4,200,000.000 4,200,000.00 -4,200,000.00 0.00 DD 12/19/03SEC ID: 99414C675BROKER: 12/19/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/19/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000% 12/22/2003 100,0000 4,400,000.000 4,400,000.00 -4,400,000.00 0.00 12/23/2003 DD 12/22/03SECID: 12/22/2003 99414E 1 19BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/22/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID B P&RUW '2 REPO 01.000% 12/23/2003 12/22/2003 100.0000 4,400,000.000 4,400,000.00 -4,400,000.00 0.00 DD 12/22/03SEC ID: 99414EI43BROKER: 12/22/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102:12/22/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990% 12/23/2003 100.0000 4,300,000.000 4,300,000.00 -4,300,000.00 0.00 12/24/2003 DD 12/23/03SECID: 12/23/2003 99414E770BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/23/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWBO09 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date -- --- -- - Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 12/24/2003 12/23/2003 100.0000 4,400,000.000 4,400,000.00 -4,400,000.00 0.00 DD 12/23/03SEC ID:99414F470BROKER: 12/23/2003 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12/23/2003 B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.9700/6 12/24/2003 100.0000 8,400,000.000 8,400,000.00 -8,400,000.00 0.00 01/02/2004 DD 12/24/03SECID: 12/24/2003 99414G593BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/24/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID B BROARWEASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/1/2003 1.0000 845,954,610 845,954.61 -845,954.61 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/1/2003 PIMCO 12/1/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/3/2003 1.0000 977.540 977.54 -977.54 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/3/2003 PIMCO 12/3/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/4/2003 1.0000 110.000 110.00 -110.00 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/4/2003 PIMCO 12/4/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/5/2003 1.0000 47,543.380 47,543.38 -47,543.38 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/5/2003 PIMCO 12/5/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/10/2003 1.0000 1,006,604.500 1,006,604.50 -1,006,604.50 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/10/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/10/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/12/2003 1.0000 0.010 0.01 -0.01 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/12/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/12/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/12/2003 1.0000 15,000,418.750 15,000,418.75 -15,000,418.75 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/12/2003 PIMCO 12/12/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/15/2003 1.0000 1,044,666.200 1,044,666.20 -1,044,666.20 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/15/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/15/2003 5 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSDXONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/16/2003 1.0000 127.500 127.50 -127.50 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/16/2003 PIMCO 12/16/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/16/2003 1.0000 28,063.960 28,063.96 -28,063.96 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/16/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/16/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/17/2003 1.0000 123.750 123.75 -123.75 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/17/2003 PIMCO 12/17/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/18/2003 1.0000 100,125.000 100,125.00 -100,125.00 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/18/2003 PIMCO 12/18/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/22/2003 1.0000 335,233.250 335,233.25 -335,233.25 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/22/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/22/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/23/2003 1.0000 100,244.440 100,244.44 -100,244.44 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/23/2003 PIMCO 12/23/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/24/2003 1,0000 300,240.470 300,240.47 -300,240.47 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/24/2003 PIMCO 12/24/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/26/2003 1.0000 952,405.150 952,405.15 -952,405.15 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/26/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/26/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/29/2003 1.0000 6,806.330 6,806.33 -6,806.33 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/29/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/29/2003 B BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCTSEC ID: 12/16/2003 1.0000 69,415.340 69,415.34 -69,415.34 0.00 9960870940CSF07522202: LONGTERM 12/16/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/16/2003 6 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: ERB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base B BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCTSEC ID: 12/26/2003 1.0000 7,130.080 7,130.08 -7,130.08 0.00 9960870940CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/26/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/26/2003 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S.DOLLAR: 170,246,190.260 170,120,766.37 -170,120,766.37 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: 170,246,190.260 170,120,766.37 -170,120,766.37 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR BC COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 11/7/2003 102.0000 -500,000.000 -510,000.00 510,000.00 0.00 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/11/2003 0IF0606C4BROKER: CHASE/GREENWICH 12/1/2003 CAP,NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM BC e8M M46F�UR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 11/7/2003 102.0625 -1,000,000.000 -1,020,625.00 1,020,625.00 0.00 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/11/2003 0 1 F0606C4BROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS& 12/1/2003 CO,NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- B E1QITTO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.0009% 11/7/2003 102.0625 1,000,000.000 1,020,625.00 -1,020,625.00 0.00 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/11/2003 0IF0606C4BROKER:GOLDMAN SACHS& 12/1/2003 CO,NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- B 51QIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 11/7/2003 102.0000 500,000.000 509,999.99 -509,999.99 0.00 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/11/2003 01F0606C4BROKER: CHASE/GREENWICH 12/1/2003 CAP,NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM BC e8W?M: UR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 11/10/2003 102.2188 -1,000,000.000 -1,022,187.50 1,022,187.50 0.00 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/11/2003 0 1 F0606C4BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/1/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07522202: LONG B F~M-F%CIMASFMTG 6.000% 11/10/2003 102.2188 1,000,000.000 1,022,187.50 -1,022,187.50 0.00 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/11/2003 0 1 F0606C4BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/1/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07522202: LONG B FMAWW AMA SF MTG 6.000% 12/8/2003 102.7188 1,000,000.000 1,027,187.50 -1,027,187.50 0.00 01/01/2034 DD 01/01/04SECID: 1/14/2004 01F060618BROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS& 12/8/2003 CO,NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO 7 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base B COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 12/8/2003 102.7188 500,000.000 513,593.75 -513,593.75 0.00 01/01/2034 DD 01/01/04SECID: 1/14/2004 0IF060618BROKER: CHASE/GREENWICH 12/8/2003 CAP,NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM B e8%MODPUR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 12/9/2003 102.8125 1,000,000.000 1,028,125.00 -1,028,125.00 0.00 01/01/2034 DD 01/01/04SECID: 1/14/2004 0 1 F060618BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/9/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07522202: LONG B Y IRPLELWEQP MTN#TR 00448 7.250% 12/22/2003 102.1120 180,000.000 183,801.60 -183,801.60 0.00 05/03/2004 DD 05/01/00SECID: 12/26/2003 36962GUR3BROKER: SPEAR LEEDS& KELLOGG, NEW YORKOCSF07511102: 12/22/2003 IB UffiWARFEMkNPMTN#tTR 00448 7.250% 12/22/2003 102.1120 0.000 0.00 -1,921.25 0.00 05/03/2004 DD 05/01/OOSECID: 12/26/2003 36962GUR3BROKER: SPEAR LEEDS& KELLOGG,NEW YORKOCSF07511102: 12/22/2003 B kWffkR?FA-R 03-RS11 A1113 VAR RT 12/17/2003 100,0000 1,000,000.000 1,000,000.00 -1,000,000.00 0.00 12/25/2033 DD 12/30/03SECID: 12/30/2003 760985K83BROKER: CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/17/2003 B VA&PA58o 8&CO NEW NT 6.625% 12/22/2003 102.8840 125,000.000 128,605.00 -128,605.00 0.00 07/15/2004 DD 07/28/99SECID: 12/26/2003 949746AA9BROKER: SPEAR LEEDS& 12/22/2003 KELLOGG,NEW YORKOCSF07511102: IB WM RMUM NEW NT 6.625% 12/22/2003 102.8840 0.000 0.00 -3,703.56 0.00 07/15/2004 DD 07/28/99SECID: 12/26/2003 949746AA9BROKER: SPEAR LEEDS& 12/22/2003 KELLOGG, NEW YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPERVM6bFIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR: 3,805,000.000 3,881,312.84 -3,886,937.65 0.00 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: 3,805,000.000 3,881,312.84 -3,886,937.65 0.00 TOTAL PURCHASES BASE: 174,051,190.260 174,002,079.21 -174,007,704.02 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR 8 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCS000010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base PU FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 12/1/2003 100.0000 10.200 10.20 -10.20 0.00 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SECID: 12/1/2003 3133TCE950CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO PU FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 6.000% 12/1/2003 100.0000 15,010.020 15,010.02 -15,010.02 0.00 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93SEC ID: 12/1/2003 3133T17A40CSF07522202: LONGTERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR 15,020.220 15,020.22 -15,020.22 0.00 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: 15,020.220 15,020.22 -15,020.22 0.00 TOTAL PAY UPS BASE: 15,020.220 15,020.22 -15,020.22 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S.DOLLAR S DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 12/17/2003SEC 12/10/2003 99.9008 -1,000,000.000 -999,008.33 999,008.33 0.00 ID:26354BZH8BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE 12/10/2003 FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: 12/10/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 12/17/2003SEC 12/10/2003 99.9008 0.000 0.00 797.23 0.00 ID: 26354BZHBBROKER:CREDIT SUISSE 12/10/2003 FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: 12/10/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISCSEC ID: 12/10/2003 99.6879 -400,000.000 -398,751.67 398,751.67 0.00 313384SS9BROKER: CHASE SECURITIES, 12/10/2003 NEW YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/10/2003 PIMCO IS FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISCSEC ID: 12/10/2003 99.6879 0.000 0.00 665.67 0.00 313384SS9BROKER: CHASE SECURITIES, 12/10/2003 NEW YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/10/2003 PIMCO S FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 01.020% 12/1/2003 100.0000 -5,000,000.000 -5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 11/28/03SEC ID: 12/1/2003 9941317174BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/1/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 9 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOL[DATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base S FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 01.020% 12/1/2003 100.0000 -4,800,000.000 -4,800,000.00 4,800,000.00 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 11/28/03SECID: 12/1/2003 9941317174BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/1/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07522202: LONG IS TFM R8W?& P REPO 01.020% 12/1/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 408.00 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 11/28/03SECID: 12/1/2003 99413F174BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/1/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07522202: LONG IS TIM 98%TeI P REPO 01.020% 12/1/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 425.00 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 11/28/03SEC ID: 12/1/2003 9941317174BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/1/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID S @RBIRSE FB REPO 01.0200% 12/2/2003 100.0000 -3,000,000.000 -3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 12/02/2003 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/2/2003 99413G495BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID 12/2/2003 IS @REBIRSE FB REPO 01.020% 12/2/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 85.00 0.00 12/02/2003 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/2/2003 99413G495BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/2/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID / S 0999C1 %2 REPO 01.020% 12/02/2003 12/2/2003 100,0000 -8,600,000.000 -8,600,000.00 8,600,000.00 0.00 DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 99413G610BROKER: 12/2/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07522202:12/2/2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.020% 12/02/2003 12/2/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 243.67 0.00 DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 99413G610BROKER: 12/2/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07522202: 12/2/2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.020% 12/02/2003 12/2/2003 100.0000 -100,000.000 -100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 99413G610BROKER: 12/2/2003 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/2/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.020% 12/02/2003 12/2/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 2.83 0.00 DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 99413G610BROKER: 12/2/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/2/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980% 12/3/2003 100.0000 -4,000,000.000 -4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 12/03/2003 DD 12/02/03SECID: 12/3/2003 99413H964BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/3/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 status: FINAL, - -Trade Date -- -- --- ------ - ---- - Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980% 12/3/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 108.89 0.00 12/03/2003 DD 12/02/03SECID: 12/3/2003 99413H964BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/3/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID S eRE49ffiSE FB REPO 00.990% 12/4/2003 100.0000 -4,000,000.000 -4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 12/04/2003 DD 12/03/03SECID: 12/4/2003 99413J440BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/4/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID IS emmgffiSE FB REPO 00.990% 12/4/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 110.00 0.00 12/04/2003 DD 12/03/03SECID: 12/4/2003 99413J440BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/4/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID S �fhk&LSR 2 REPO 00.980% 12/05/2003 12/5/2003 100.0000 -4,000,000.000 -4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 DD 12/04/03SEC ID: 99413L601BROKER: 12/5/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: 12/5/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 12/05/2003 12/5/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 108.89 0.00 DD 12/04/03SEC ID: 99413 L60 1 BROKER: 12/5/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: 12/5/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.010% 12/12/2003 100.0000 -7,500,000.000 -7,500,000.00 7,500,000.00 0.00 12/12/2003 DD 12/11/03SECID; 12/12/2003 99413T844BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/12/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID / IS ei§BIF SE FB REPO 01.010% 12/12/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 210.42 0.00 12/12/2003 DD 12/11/03SECID: 12/12/2003 99413T844BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/12/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID S 994MRSAq 2 REPO 01.000% 12/12/2003 12/12/2003 100.0000 -7,500,000.000 -7,500,000.00 7,500,000.00 0.00 DD 12/11/03SEC ID: 99413T919BROKER: 12/12/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/12/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 12/12/2003 12/12/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 208.33 0.00 DD 12/11/03SEC ID: 99413T919BROKER: 12/12/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/12/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.020% 12/16/2003 100.0000 -4,500,000.000 -4,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 12/16/2003 DD 12/15/03SECID: 12/16/2003 99413W904BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/16/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 11 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USO OCSD-CONSOLTDATED-OCS000010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 status: FINAL Trade Date --- ---- Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.020% 12/16/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 127.50 0.00 12/16/2003 DD 12/15/03SECID: 12/16/2003 99413W904BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/16/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID S Mfkr Wl ff 2 REPO 00.990% 12/17/2003 12/17/2003 100.0000 -4,500,000.000 -4,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 DD 12/16/03SEC ID:99413Y355BROKER: 12/17/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/17/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.990%12/17/2003 12/17/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 123.75 0.00 DD 12/16/03SEC ID: 99413Y355BROKER: 12/17/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/17/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 100.0000 -4,500,000.000 -4,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 DD 12/17/03SEC ID:99413Z907BROKER: 12/18/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/18/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 125.00 0.00 DD 12/17/03SEC ID: 99413Z907BROKER: 12/18/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: 12/18/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.010% 12/19/2003 12/19/2003 100.0000 -4,400,000.000 -4,400,000.00 4,400,000.00 0.00 DD 12/18/03SEC ID: 99414BI31BROKER: 12/19/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/19/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.010% 12/19/2003 12/19/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 123.44 0.00 DD 12/18/03SEC ID:99414BI 3 1 BROKER: 12/19/2003 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/19/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000% 12/22/2003 100.0000 -4,500,000.000 -4,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 12/22/2003 DD 12/19/03SECID: 12/22/2003 99414B651BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/22/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID / IS emBiP99RSE FB REPO 01.0000% 12/22/2003 100,0000 0.000 0.00 375.00 0.00 12/22/2003 DD 12/19/03SECID: 12/22/2003 9941413651BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/22/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID S MR&M 2 REPO 00.990% 12/22/2003 12/22/2003 100.0000 -4,200,000.000 -4,200,000.00 4,200,000.00 0.00 DD 12/19/03SEC ID: 99414C675BROKER: 12/22/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/22/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12 Workbench Transaction Detail _ Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USE) OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.990% 12/22/2003 12/22/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 346.50 0.00 DD 12/19/03SEC ID: 99414C675BROKER: 12/22/2003 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/22/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000% 12/23/2003 100.0000 -4,400,000.000 -4,400,000.00 4,400,000.00 0.00 12/23/2003 DD 12/22/03SECID: 12/23/2003 99414E119BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/23/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID IS eKEB1P?IFffiSE FB REPO 01.000% 12/23/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 122.22 0.00 12/23/2003 DD 12/22/03SECID: 12/23/2003 99414E119BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/23/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID S Efflk ff. ff 2 REPO 01.000% 12/23/2003 12/23/2003 100.0000 -4,400,000.000 -4,400,000.00 4,400,000.00 0.00 DD 12/22/03SEC ID:99414E143BROKER: 12/23/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 12/23/2003 IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 12/23/2003 12/23/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 122.22 0.00 DD 12/22/03SEC ID:99414E143BROKER: 12/23/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/23/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990% 12/24/2003 100.0000 -4,300,000.000 -4,300,000.00 4,300,000.00 0.00 12/24/2003 DD 12/23/03SEC ID: 12/24/2003 99414E770BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/24/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID IS REBONffiSE FB REPO 00.990% 12/24/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 118.25 0.00 12/24/2003 DD 12/23/03SEC ID: 12/24/2003 99414E770BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/24/2003 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID S 9A§FX*L 2 REPO 01.000% 12/24/2003 12/24/2003 100.0000 -4,400,000.000 -4,400,000.00 4,400,000.00 0.00 DD 12/23/03SEC ID:99414F470BROKER: 12/24/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/24/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 12/24/2003 12/24/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 122.22 0.00 DD 12/23/03SEC ID: 99414F470BROKER: 12/24/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102:12/24/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/1/2003 1.0000 -2,857,827.500 -2,857,827.50 2,857,827.50 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/1/2003 13 Workbench Transaction Detail Report M: EWBoo9 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCW,CONSOLIDATED-OCS000010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 status:FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/2/2003 1.0000 -899,912.170 -899,912.17 899,912.17 0.00 996085247OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 12/2/2003 PIMCO 12/2/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/2/2003 1.0000 -20,654.420 -20,654.42 20,654.42 0.00 996085247OCSF07522202:LONG TERM 12/2/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/2/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/3/2003 1.0000 -197,666.560 -197,666.56 197,666.56 0.00 996085247OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/3/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/3/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/10/2003 1.0000 -100,777.100 -100,777.10 100,777.10 0.00 996085247OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 12/10/2003 PIMCO 12/10/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/11/2003 1.0000 -971,197.660 -971,197.66 971,197.66 0.00 996085247OCSF07522202:LONG TERM 12/11/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/11/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/15/2003 1.0000 -14,959,818.330 -14,959,818.33 14,959,818.33 0.00 996085247OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 12/15/2003 PIMCO 12/15/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/17/2003 1.0000 -1,027,665.080 -1,027,665.08 1,027,665.08 0.00 996085247OCSF07522202: LONGTERM 12/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/17/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/19/2003 1.0000 -67,504.030 -67,504.03 67,504.03 0.00 996085247OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 12/19/2003 PIMCO 12/19/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/22/2003 1.0000 -98,176.280 -98,176.28 98,176.28 0.00 996085247OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 12/22/2003 PIMCO 12/22/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/26/2003 1.0000 -318,031.410 -318,031.41 318,031.41 0.00 996085247OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 12/26/2003 PIMCO 12/26/2003 14 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date -- ---- ----- �� �—_ _- -- Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/30/2003 1.0000 -1,399,600.000 -1,399,600.00 1,399,600.00 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/30/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/30/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/31/2003 1.0000 -240.970 -240.97 240-97 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 12/31/2003 PIMCO 12/31/2003 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/31/2003 1.0000 -374.570 -374.57 374.57 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/31/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/31/2003 S BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCTSEC ID: 12/17/2003 1.0000 -69,415.340 -69,415.34 69,415.34 0.00 9960870940CSF07522202: LONGTERM 12/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/17/2003 S BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCTSEC ID: 12/29/2003 1.0000 -7,130.080 -7,130.08 7,130.08 0.00 9960870940CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/29/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/29/2003 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR: -116,995,991.500 -116,993,751.60 116,998,831.53 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: -116,995,991.500 -116,993,751.50 116,998,831.53 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR S COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 12/8/2003 103.1211 -500,000.000 -510,562.50 515,605.46 5,042.96 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/11/2003 0IF0606C4BROKER: CHASE/GREENWICH 12/8/2003 CAP,NEW YORKOCSF07522202:LONG TERM S eW?ib':�UR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 12/8/2003 103.1211 -1,000,000.000 -1,021,125.00 1,031,210.94 10,085.94 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 12/11/2003 0 1 F0606C4BROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS& 12/8/2003 CO,NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- S ENRIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 12/9/2003 103.2148 -1,000,000.000 -1,021,124.99 1,032,148.44 11,023.45 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SECID: 12/11/2003 01F0606C4BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 12/9/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency USD locsj�-CwSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base S FNMA POOL##0545998 6.000% 12/19/2003 103.5625 -197,898.510 -205,814.45 204,948.65 -865.80 11/01/2032 DD 10/01/02SECID: 12/22/2003 31385JR17BROKER: CITIGROUPGBL 12/19/2003 MKTS/SALOMON,NEW YORKOCSF07522202: is 12/19/2003 12/19/2003 103.5625 0.000 0.00 692.64 0.00 11/01/2032 DD 10/01/02SECID: 12/22/2003 31385JRT7BROKER: CITIGROUPGBL 12/19/2003 MKTS/SALOMON,NEW YORKOCSF07522202: S PINZEFAWISP98fM9.875% 11/15/2004 12/4/2003 104,1797 -5,000,000.000 -5,226,367.19 5,208,984.38 -17,382.81 DD 11/15/99SEC ID: 9128275S7BROKER: 12/5/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:12/4/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS U S TREASURY NOTES 05.875% 11/15/2004 12/4/2003 104.1797 0.000 0.00 16,140.11 0.00 DD 11/15/99SEC ID: 9128275S7BROKER: 12/5/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102: 12/4/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR: -7,697,898.510 -7,984,994.13 8,009,730.62 7,903.74 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: -7,697,898.510 -7,984,994.13 8,009,730.62 7,903.74 TOTAL SALES BASE: -124,693,890.010 -124,978,745.63 125,008,562.15 7,903.74 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR PD WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 4000-1 1 150 7.500% 12/1/2003 100.0000 -769.490 -752.78 769.49 16.71 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99SECID: 12/1/2003 302998GE30CSF07522202: LONGTERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO PD FHLMC GROUP##G4-0353 7.500% 12/1/2003 100.0000 -97.630 -100.10 97.63 -2.47 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99SECID: 12/1/2003 3128DBMA20CSF07522202: LONGTERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO PDC FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 11/1/2003 100.0000 37,783.050 37,823.30 -37,783.05 40.25 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SECID: 11/1/2003 3133TCE950CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO 16 Workbench ipuagxloM L T £OOZ/i/Zi 00WId-s3d0 EOOZ/I/ZT Mal ONO'I:ZOZZZSL03SOOOwUI?L£T£ 01 OSS66/10/60 QQ VIOZ/1040 8S'L6Z' 8t'£SG'9 90'ISO'L- 08t'£SL'9- 0000*001 £OOZ/I/ZT %000'9 086E6E0#100d VWMS 0d EOOZ/T/ZT OOWId-USdO EOOZ/I/ZT W"dSlON01 :ZOZZZSLOdSO09td1TLEIE OIOXSEO/10/11 au STOZ/10/Zi 179'99- 96'ZZI'S 09'881'S- 096'ZZT'S- 0000'OO1 £00Z/T/Zi %000'S L86t2ZO#100d VWMA 0d com/l/m O0WId-Had0 EOOZ/T/ZT MIX,L JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO0IZXII Lei E 01 OXSE0/I0/0I 00 STOZ/TO/I I L9'9t- t8'Zt9'£ I9'689'E- Ot8'Zt9'£- 0000'001 £OOZ/i/ZT %000'S E96tSZ0#100d VWMA 0d EOOZ/i/Z I OOWId-*HgdO £OOZ/T/ZT Mal ON01 •ZOZZZSLOAS00EH01TLET£ 0I OXS£0/I0/80 QQ 8TOZ/TO/60 £0'91- EE'tES 9E'OSS- OEE'bES- 0000'OOI E00Z/T/ZT %000'S 998tSZ0#100d VWNd 0d E00Z/T/Z I 00WId-S3dO EOOZ/i/ZI M31ON01:ZOZZZSL04SO06ASXILEIC :0I OXSEO/TO/SO QQ 8IOZ/10/90 LS'6t- St'ZS9'I ZO'ZOL'I- OSt'ZS9'T- 0000*001 E00Z/i/ZI 0/0000'9 09LbSZ0#100d VWN3 0d EOOZ/I/Z i 00 WId-USdO EOOZ/i/ZT M31ON01:ZOZZZSL0.3S00LtAXILEIE -0I OXSEO/TO/TO QQ 81OZ/10/ZO 90'TL- SS'89E'Z 19'6£t'Z- OSS'89£'Z- 0000'OO1 £00Z/T/Zi 0/6000'9 TE9tSZO#100d VWNA od EOOZ/i/Z I 00 W Id-S2ldO EOOZ/i/ZT WS21ON01:ZOZZZSLOdS00tEAXT LET 6 0I0XSZ0/10/OI ac LIOZ/TO/iT St'L6E- EVSK,ET 88'St9'ET- OEt'8tZ`£T- 0000*001 £OOZ/i/Zi 0/6000'S OTStSZO#100d VWMA 0d EOOZ/i/Z T OOWId-S2dO EOOZ/T/ZI WN211 ON01 •ZOZZZSLO.HS00£ZMS8tEIE 0I0XSL6/10/ZT 00 8ZOZ/I0/10 E817 IZ'861 8E'E61- OIZ'861- 0000'OOI EOOZ/T/Zi %t8E'9 t909-8L#dflOSO OW1H3 0d EOOZ/i/Z I OOWId-SgdO £OOZ/T/Zi W2IX'I'ONO'I •ZOZZZSLO.dS00S6XO,LEEIE 0I0XSL6/10/ZT 00 ZEOZ/9I/80 69'8£- 9Z'9IE'9E t6'ESE'9E- OSZ'STE'9E- 0000'001 EOOZ/I/ZT IH UVA V£X H3S DIW SSVIOLL1f1W 0W1Hd 0d EOOZ/i/ZT 00WId-HZdO £OOZ/T/I I WSM ON01:ZOZZZSL03SOOS6X0,LEET E OIOXSL6/TO/ZT 00 Z£OZ/9I/80 9Z'Ot- 9Z'E6L'LE IS'EE8'LE- OSZ'E6L'LE- 0000'OO1 £OOZ/T/I T UI HVA V 6S 2I2S OJW SSVI0I,L1f1W OW1Hd 0d asma asBg asBg jud/sasBgg asBg a;Ba papodag uoj;dF=asaa adAl ssoZ/ulmo ;aH :junoulv 4so3 a;sa ap;ag sissy a;BQ oplaiy 'IVKIJ EOOZ/TS/ZT - EOWT/ZT 0000i0000soo-afcdanosxoo-asoo asn :Aouaucep aseg 6joga;sC) uol;ousuiaay Aq papoda'a 60oaMa :ai:Podoa u as uonovsuvj L tpua"jom 8 T £OOZ/T/Zi 00WI&SgdO E00Z/T/ZI W'821ON01 :ZOZZZSL0dS00EZl1MS8£T£ QI03SZO/TO/IT QQ LIOZ/TO/OT t?C'96Z- 89'ZOL'9 ZO'866'9- 089'ZO4'9- 0000*001 EOOZ/T/ZT %000'9 TOTS99011100d VWN.3 CId £OOZ/T/Z 1 OOW Id-SSd0 EOOZ/T/ZT WHSI0N0'I :ZOZZZSL03S00LlsrS8ETE CII035Z0/TO/OT QQZEOZ/IO/TT OE'60£- 09'ZEL'L 06'Iti0'8- 009'ZEL'L- 0000*001 EOOZ/T/ZT %000'9 866SKOH 1OOd VWN,d Qd EOOZ/T/ZT 00WId-Zl3d0 EOOZ/T/ZT WHS'L0N0't :ZOZZZ2L0As3oLsoflssETE GI 03SZO/I0/EO QQ LTOZ/TO/EO 69*981- 06*9CZ't, 6S'EZb'b- 006'9EZ'b- OOOO'OOT EOOZ/T/ZT %000'9 08SSb90#100d VWN3 CId EOOZ/T/ZT 00WId-213d0 EOOZ/T/ZT WSSIL JNO'I :ZOZZ3SLOdS000ZXHS8ETE (II03STO/10/OT QQ 91OZ/10/TT Lb'EOT'Z- ZE'SEL'Lb 6L'Tt,8'61,- OZE'SEL'LI7- 0000*001 COW I/ZT %000'9 96ZSi7SO#100d VWNd CId EOOZ/T/Z T 00 W Id-ZI3dO EOOZ/T/ZT WSM ONO'T :ZOZZZSL03SOOTHOMb E BET :CII 03SOO/10/ZT QQ 9TOZ/TO/TO 89'9Z9'S- 8L'L69'LZT 9b'bZE'££T- OSL'L69'LZT- OOOO'OOI £OOZ/I/ZT %000'9 ZL996SO#'I00d VWNd CId EOOZ/T/ZT 00WId-SgdO EOOZ/I/ZI WHSI0N0'I :ZOZZZSL03S0080ZAb8EiE CII 03500/TO/LO QQ STOZ/TO/90 IZ'E6Z- bb'bS9'9 99'Lt,6'9- Obb'bS9'9- 0000'OO1 EOOZ/i/ZI %000'9 TSbSESO#'IOOd VWNd CId EOOZ/I/Z 1 00 W Id-NgdO EOOZ/l/ZI W83.L0NO'1 :ZOZZZSL03S00OM3aE8EiE 01 03S66/10/60 QQ t lOZ/TO/60 96'98- L9'Z6Z'T E9'6tC'T- OL9'Z6Z'T- 0000'001 VOW I/Z1 `6000'9 6b960S0#'100d VWNd (Id EOOZ/l/Z I 00Wld-SSd0 EOOZ/1/Z[ W831Dmo 1 :ZOZZZSLOgS00ZL00T8EIE Cll03566/10/ZO03 t7TOZ/TO/ZO ZT'6b£- 6Z'£Z6'L Tb'ZLZ'8- 06Z'EZ6'L- 0000'001 EOOZ/l/ZT "/oOOO'9 ZSb9Sb0#'I00d VWNd CId EOOZ/i/Z i 00 W Id-S3d0 EOOZ/T/ZT WN21ON0'1 :ZOZZZSLOdS00ILVX9LETE QI03S£0/TO/60 QQ STOZ/TO/60 89'9TT- 86'£LZ'O1 9S'68E'Oi- 086'ELZ'01- 0000'OO1 EOOZ/T/ZT 0/0000'S OEbLSEO#'IOOd VWNA CId EOOZ/T/ZT 00WId-S2d0 £OOZ/i/Zi WS310N0'I :ZOZZZSL03S008WtIr9LETE CII 03SE0/10/10 QQ 8TOZ/10/I0 TE'LT- LOLLS WKS- OLO'LLS- 0000'001 EOOZ/T/ZT 0/6000'9 8Z£LSEO#'IOOd VWN3 Qd asug asug aslag sud/sasugs asug -- - alva papodou -- uopdjjosaQ adAl ssoZ/uluo jam ;unotuv ;soo aoF�d 04u(l ai3;as uwj a;uQ apwl 'IE/1+u3 'sn;8;s cooWlE/ZT - coot ET 0000ioo0osoo-aasvQrrosntoa-asoo QSA :6auaun0 asug Ajo2a:juC) uoi:jovsuuj L dq pwpodaa 600EMS :QI:podag Its;aQ sot;ousulail K�uaQ�1�oM 61 £ooZ/T/Z I OOWId-2I2dO £00Z/I/ZI Mal ONO'I :Z0ZZZSL0.3SO09)iUL8£I£ QIOSSTO/TO/Lo QQ 910Z/TO/Lo 80'Lb£- E6-9L8'L IO'bZZ'8- o£6'9L8`L- 0000'00I EOOZ/I/ZT 0/6000'9 Z00b6S0#'I00d VWNd Qd EOOZ/T/ZI 0OWId-N2d0 EOOZ/i/ZT VMSJ,ON01 •ZOZZZSLOdSO0I6PQL8EIC QIOSSIO/IO/SO QQ 9TOZ/I0/SO 6i'Tbi- ££'bOZ'£ ZS'Sb£'E- o££'bOZ'E- 0000'00I £OOZ/i/ZI %000'9 88808SO#'I00d VWNd Qd EooZ/i/Z I OO W Id-21Sd0 £00Z/I/ZT WUSI0N0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO098AX98£IE (]IOSsTO/TO/b0 QQ 910Z/IO/b0 bT'LZZ- 86'bSI'S ZI'Z8E'S- 086'bST'S- 0000'00I £OoZ/T/ZT %000'9 6E49490#100d VWNd Qd EOOZ/I/Z T 0OWId-2I3d0 E00Z/T/ZI W2I210mO'I :ZOZZZSLoJs30ZLPX98ETE (]I OSsioho/SO QQ 9TOZ/10/SO 9I'9I- b8'99E 00'£SE- Ob8'99£- 0000'00I EOOZ/I/ZI %000'9 98E9490#'I00d VWNd Qd £OoZ/T/Z i 0OWId-ZI2d0 E00Z/T/Zi WN310N0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO0890XS8£I£ QI OSS£0/I0/90 QQ 8IOZ/I0/LO L8'BZI- SS'SSb'II Zb'b8S'II oSS'SSb'II- 0000'00I EOoZ/I/ZT %000'9 IZ99990#100d VWNd Qd £OoZ/I/Z I OO W Id-NSdO EOOZ/i/ZT M31ON0'I :ZOZZZSLOdsOOZsSXS8EIE QI Oss£0/IO/SO QQ 81OZ/I0/90 bL'oZT- SL'bZO'b 6b'9bi'b- OSL'bZ0'b- 0000'001 EOoZ/I/ZI 0/6000'S SbSSSSo#'IOOd VWNd Qd EOOZ/I/ZI 0OWId-NSd0 EOOZ/T/ZT WN:R,LONOI :ZOZZZSL09SOOS6QXS8ET£ (IIOss£o/To/so as E£oZ/To/bo £Z'L9i'T- 08'081'6Z £0'8b£'OE- 008'081'6Z- 0000'001 £OoZ/i/ZT 0/6000'9 8ZSSS90#'IOOd VWNd (Id £OoZ/T/ZI 0OWId-8Sd0 EOOZ/T/ZI WHS.LONO'I :ZZ OZZSLodsO09MSXS8EI£ 41OSSE0/TO/b0 QQ 8TOZ/10/90 90'9- E6'ZLb 66'8Lb- OC6'ZLb- 0000'001 EoOZ/T/ZT 0/6000'S £SbSSSO#'IOOd VWNd Qd £OOZ/I/ZI 0OWId-N3d0 EOOZ/i/Zi W2IN,L ON0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOIASMS8EI£ QI 02S£o/10/£0 QQ 8TOZ/IO/b0 E8'69I- SS'LZE'S 8E'48b'S- 0SS'LZE'S- 0000'00T EOoZ/T/ZT 0/6000'S E9ESSSOVI00d VWNd Qd £OoZ/T/Z T 0OWId-Ssd0 EOOZ/T/ZT W2IS,L 0m0II :ZOZZZ9LOdsO0LSZMS8EIE QI OSSEO/IO/ZO QQ EEOZ/IO/£O ST'SSO'T b8'8LE'9Z 66'E£b'LZ- ob8'8L£'9Z- 0000'00I £OOZ/I/ZI 0/6000'9 SBZSSSO#'IOOd VWNA Qd asgg assg osgg - — igd/saiBgg 08788 -- — alga papoda-a uoyidposaa adAj ssoZ/UTvq laid lunouiv 4903 a3lid alga 09l0S ug=y alga apgsy I°'KI3 CSUIVIS £OOZ/TE/ZT - EOOZ/T/ZT — ---- - - - 0000i0000soo-aszdQrrosnroo-asoo Qsn :Aouarsn3 aseg A-1020490 U0I1T0TSSUvJy Aq pajjoda21 600aM3 :cU 4jodag TIg�aQ uoi�aBsuBsy 1PUa"JOAI OZ £OOZ/i/ZT OOWId-HSdO EOOZ/i/ZI WH31 DNO'I:ZOZZZSLO.dSOOT.UAi6£i£ QI OSSEO/TO/TO Qa 8TOZ/10/7'O 96'0£- 98'T co,I Z8'Z90'I- 098,T co,i- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT %000'S bE£1890#100d VWXd ad EOOZ/I/Z I OOWId-SECIO £OOZ/T/ZT WHSIDMO'I•ZOZZZSL03SOObS£AI6£i£ QIOSSEO/TO/ZO QQ 8IOZ/IO/ZO i8'LZZ- 09'£6S'L Tb'TZS'L- 009'E6S'4- 0000'001 EOOZ/i/ZT %000'S 60ETS90#100d VWNd Qd £OOZ/T/ZI OOWid-HSdO £OOZ/T/Zi W2IS.I JNO'I:ZOZZZSLodS3OZH9dT6£TE QIOSSZO/TO/TT QQ LTOZ/TO/80 69'089- £9'9Li'£T ZZ'LSL'ET- 0£9'9LT'Ei- 0000'001 EOOZ/I/Zi %000'9 08ZEL90#'I00d VWN3 ad 800Z/i/Z i OO W Id-HZdO EOOZ/T/ZT WS91 ONO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSO08QSb06£i£ (IIOSSZO/TO/LO as LiOZ/i0/LO ZS'8£0'I- 4Z'695;'EZ 6L'409'bZ- OLZ'699'£Z- 0000'001 EOOZ/i/ZT 0/6000'9 911£S90#'I00d VWNd (Id COW I/ZT 00WId-HZdO £OOZ/I/Zi WHZI ON07:ZOZZZSLO.dS000Sa665EI E :QIOSSZO/TO/LO QQ LTOZ/TO/LO IL'998- 90'OL9'6T 9L'9ES'OZ' 090'OL9'61- 0000'00I £OOZ/T/ZI %000'9 9L£ZE90#100d VWN& Qd EOOZ/i/Z I OOWId-HgdO £OOZ/T/ZI WsailONO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSOOZHAN68£i£ -QI OSSZO/IO/ZO QQ LIOZ/IO/ZO TT'bE£- 89'Z8S'L 6L'9I6'L- 089'ZSS'L- 0000'001 £OOZ/i/Zi %000'9 Z19OE90#100d VWN3 Qd £OOZ/T/Z T 00W Id-SHdO E00Z/T/Zi WS31ONO'I:ZOZZZSLOdS006dSM88ETE QI0SSTO/TO/ZT au 9TOZ/10/Zi bi'T£- SL'90L 68'L£L- OSL'90L- 0000'001 £00Z/T/ZI %000'9 b£L9190#700d VWNd (Id £00Z/i/ZT OOWId-USdO £OOZ/T/Zi WHS.L JNO'I•ZOZZZSLOdSO08LZIS8ET£ QI OSSiO/I0/60 QQ 91OZ/TO/0I £0'9ZZ- L8'6ZT'S 06'SSE'S- OL8'6ZT'S- 0000'001 EOOZ/i/ZT %OOO'9 99£8090#100d VWNA Qd £OOZ/i/Z i 00WId-S3dO £OOZ/T/ZI M31 JNO'I :ZOZZZSLodSOOIJWH88£I8 QI OSSTO/10/60 QQ 9IOZ/10/60 LL'IbL- bb'b£8'9T iZ'9LS'Li- Obi,,'17£8'9T- 0000*001 EOOZ/T/ZT %000'9 69ZS090#'IOOd VWNd Qd EOOZ/T/ZT OOWId-SadO E00Z/i/ZT WS31DNO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSO096,LXL8£IE QI 03STO/10/80 QQ 91OZ/10/60 86'L9- £L'ZtiS'I TL'019'1- OEL'ZtS'I- 0000'00I £OOZ/I/Zi %OOO'9 9L£L690#'IOOd VWN3 Qd asag asBg asBg ilea/so"gs asBg -- o4vcl papodag uoj4djiasaQ adAl ssoZ/ulvo 40H ;unouid :1903 aoFid apa an-as uIUy a;sa opwiL 'IFTHId :Sni$IS £oOZ/T£/ZT - £OOZ/T/ZT OOOOT000asOO-a2tvarrosnroo-asno asn :6ouaunp aseg Ajo2a;3o uoT4ol3suwj, Aq popodoH e000m :ai uodau Pula Q i<ioT;assu�y ipuag3p01A T Z £OOZ/I/Z i OOW Id-NSdO £OOZ/T/Zi Mial JNO'I :ZOZZZSLodS00Z,dlloobT£ QI03S£0/i0/t0 QQ 8TOZ/TO/SO ZL'LT- 9L'069 8t'809- 09L'069- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT %000'S 9ZOL690#'IOOd VWN,d Qd £OOZ/T/ZT 00WId-S2dO £00Z/T/ZT WN31L JNOI:ZOZZZSL03S00£ZOSOObT£ QI 035£0/I0/SO QQ 8IOZ/Io/SO £6'68Z- 8Z't99'6 TZ't96'6- 087,'b99`6- 0000'OOT £OOZ/T/ZT 0/6000'9 6889690#'IOOd VWNA (Id £OOZ/I/ZT 00WId-2I3dO £OOZ/T/ZI WH31L JNO'I :ZOZZZSL03S000ASSOObT£ QI035£o/TO/SO QQ 8TOZ/10/90 66'OST- SO'££o'S t0't81'S- OSO'££0`s- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT 0/6000'S ZS89690#'IOOd VWNA Qd £o0Z/I/ZT O3WId-8SdO £OOZ/T/ZT Wd3'I OMO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOObLAd00bT£ QI 03S£0/i0/£0 QQ 8TOZ/TO/£0 b6'£T£- LL't9t'OT TL'8LL'OT- OLL't9t`OT- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT %000'9 b£8£690#'IOOd VWN3 Qd £OOZ/T/ZI OOWId-HZdO £OOZ/T/ZT Wx2 L ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03S008JW}IOObI£ :GI 33S£o/10/S0 as SIOZ/To/SO 9S'6£T- £I768'01 69'T£0'iI- 0£I'Z68`01- 0000'001 £OOZ/I/ZT %000'S 6986890#100d VWMA Qd £OoZ/i/Z T OO W Id-N3dO £OOZ/T/ZI Wd8'I'ONO'I :ZOZZZSL0dS006'I3f00bT£ QI 03S£O/TO/90 QQ 81OZ/10/90 00'91- Lt'££S Lb'6tS- oLt'££S- 0000'001 £OoZ/T/ZT 0/6000'S 6£L8890#'IOOd VWN3 Qd £OOZ/T/Z i OO W Id-N3dO £OOZ/T/ZI WS310NO'I:ZOZZZSL03S00L8d300tT£ QI 03S£0/TO/£0 QQ 8i0Z/10/£0 89'861- £9'ZZ9'9 T£'TZ8`9- 0£9'ZZ9`9- 0000'001 £OoZ/I/Zi 0/6000'9 8i£9890#100d VWN3 Qd £OoZ/T/ZI OOWId-d3dO £00Z/T/Zi WNSIL ONO'I :ZOZZZSLodS00ZZjA300ti£ QI 03S£0/TO/ZO QQ 8TOZ/10/Zo Sb'ST ZT'SIS 4S'0£S- oZT'STS- 0000'001 £00Z/T/Zi 0/6000'S 9999890#'I00d VWNA Qd £OoZ/T/ZT 00WId-S3d0 £OOZ/T/ZT Wd31LONO'I •ZOZZZSLOdS00LHJ300ti£ at 03S£0/10/£o as STOZ/To/£o K'S£- Ot'684'7, tT'SZ8`Z- 00t'68L'Z- 0000'001 £OoZ/I/ZT 0/6000'S 0OZ9890#'I00d VWN3 Qd £OOZ/T/ZI 00WId-H3d0 £OOZ/T/ZI WS31Omo'I :ZOZZZSLoAS00T2i£000tT£ QI 03s£o/To/so as SioZ/10/90 8t'I L9'I 06'Z69'T 08b'I L9`I- 0000*001 £OOZ/i/Zi 0/6000'S 806b890#'IOOd VWN3 dd --aqua aqua aqua Ivd/SDJBgg asua-- — a;uQ papodag uopdposaa adSl ssoZ/UTVD 40M ;unomV :Js03 aoFsd 0318Q alljos uuiy a;uQ apu:y 'IHISI3 :snleis £OOZ/T£/ZT - £OOZ/T/ZT OOOOIOOOflSOO-Q7,L6'QI?OSIITOO-QSOO asn :Sououn0 assa Aso2al7so uoi;oBsuBay Aq popodag 600aMS :aI:podag IT131aQ uoI o-esuluj, IPUO"JOM ZZ £OOZ/T/Zi O3WId-S2dO £OOZ/T/ZT W�T21Om07 :ZOZZZSLOdS0080I�IIOVI£ QIOSS£0/TO/90 as BTOZ/TO/90 b£'Zb£- bE'iib'TT 89'£SL'TI- Ob£'TTVII- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZI 0/0000'9 S£ZOT Lou'IOOd VWMA Qd £OOZ/T/Z I OOW Id-2ISd0 £OOZ/T/ZT WSSZ ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03S000A"lObT£ QI OSSEO/10/90 QQ 8i0Z/i0/90 ZS'I- 06'8I1 Zb'OZi- 006'811- 0000'001 £OOZ/I/Zi 0/6000'5; £966040#'I00d VWMA Qd EOOZ/I/Z I OOW Id-HgdO £OOZ/T/Zi WNSIONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SDOVf' !'TObTE 41OSSEO/TO/90 au 8TOZ/I0/90 18'9£- LS'176L'Z S£'OE8'Z- 04S'b6L'Z- 0000'001 £006/1/ZI %000'S LI660L0#'IOOd VWNA (Id EOOZ/i/Z I 00WId-H2d0 EOOZ/i/Z I WSSZ JNO'I 'ZOZZZSL0.3SOObdSf TObi£ QIOSS£0/TO/90 QQ 8TOZ/10/90 68'ZI- OL'S00'T 69'810'I- OOL'S00'T- 0000'001 EOOZ/T/ZI 0/6000'9 9Z860LO#'I00d VWN4 ad EOOZ/i/Z I 00WId-H2dO £OOZ/T/Zi M21ONO'I :ZOZZZSLodSD09SH1'i0bi£ :QI O3S£0/10/90 ac 8IOZ/10/LO 9£'LE- bZ'9T6'Z 09'ES6'Z- Otz,916'Z- 0000'00T £OOZ/T/Zi 0/6000'S 09£60LO#'IOOd VWNd Qd £OOZ/T/Z I 00W Id-NSdO £OOZ/I/ZI W831ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOLWZHIObTE di 0SSE0/10/90 au 8TOZ/10/90 Zb"9L- E£'LbS'Z SL'EZ9'Z- 0££'LbS'Z- 0000'001 £OOZ/I/LI %000'9 8b160LO#'IOOd VWNA Qd COW I/Z I 00WId-UZdO COW I/Z I W831 ONO'I :ZOZZZSLodSOO£OOSTObT£ Cll O3SE0/l0/b0 ca LIOZ1101I0 8b'L£- b9'098 MOSS- ObS'OS8- 0000'001 COW I/ZI °;A00'9 961£OLO#'I00d VWN.d Qd £OOZ/I/Z 1 00WId-SSdO £OOZ/I/Z l WS3'.JNO'l :ZOZZ7.SLOdS00ZQHVT0t I£ Q1O3SE0/I0/b0 QQ 8IOZ/10/SO 6£'9Z- ZO'090'Z Ib'980'Z- OZ0'090'Z- 0000'001 COW I/ZI 0/6000'9 SZ£ZOLO#'IOOd VWNA Qd £OOZ/i/Z I 00WId-SgdO £OOZ/T/ZI WS31ONO'I :ZOZZZSLO,dS006dQVI0tT£ QIOSS£0/TO/SO au 8TOZ/IO/SO TO'ZOZ- 19'EEL'9 ZS'S£6'9- 019'£EL'9- 0000'001 E00Z/I/ZT 0/6000'S OTZZOLO#'IOOd VWN3 Qd £OOZ/i/Z T OO W Id-USdO £OOZ/i/Zi WSS,LONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOZAdA00bI£ QI 02S£0/10/E0 QQ LTOZ/10/60 TT'IZ- TT'6Lb ZZ'OOS- 011'6Lb- 0000'00T £OOZ/I/ZT %000'9 6E68690#'I00d VWNA (Id ogles ogles asleg =gd/sasiags - eggs -- a;gQ papodag -— uoi;duosaQ adAl ssoZ/uFgq ;am ;unouiv :1903 ao�sd a4va awiss ugly a;gQ apgsy ,,,Kl3 :sn;83 s HOOZ/T£/ZT - EOOZ/T/ZT 000010000soo-affavarrosxoa-asoo asn :Aouauna aseg 6so2a;gC) uorlowsussy Aq papodag 600gma :ai:pcaau jFs;aa u0possusuy tpuag3ijoAl £Z £OOZ/T/Z i 00W Id-2ISd0 EOOZ/T/ZI WSM ONO'I :ZOZZZSL0.3S00ZaQfIZObi£ QI OSSEO/TO/OT QQ BTOZ/TO/OT Z£'88b'Z OZ'OZS'Z- OZ£'88b'Z- 0000'00I £00Z/T/ZT 0/0000'S TTZ8EL0#100d VWNd (id £OOZ/T/Z T OOW Id-szd0 £OOZ/I/Zi W23lONO'I:ZOZZZSLO,dSO06dbSZObTE QI 32SEO/I0/01 QQ 8TOZ/10/01 06'Tb- 6Z'OLZ'E ET'ZTE'£- OEZ'OLZ'E- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZI %000'9 0£TLELO#'100d VWNd Qd EOOZ/T/ZI 00WId-21Sd0 £OOZ/I/ZI WHS'lONO'I'ZOZZZSLods3oSN.3wzotlTE QI OSSEO/TO/OT (la BTOZ/TO/I I LL'I- 61'8EI 96'6£I- 06T'8EI- 0000*001 £OOZ/T/ZT %000'9 £L8Z£LO#'IOOd VWNS (Id EOOZ/I/ZI OOWId-SgdO £OOZ/T/Zi W'821 DNO'I :ZOZZZSL0.3SO0£M2IHZObT£ QT0SSE0/T0/LO QQ 8IOZ/10/LO 66'90I- Ob'OS£'8 6£'LSb'8- OOb'OS£'8- 0000'OOT £OOZ/T/ZT %000'S 1096ZLO#'I00d VWNd Qd £OOZ/T/ZT OOWId-NSdO £OOZ/I/ZT MIS,LONO'I:ZOZZZSLOdsooi7b VZOi7I£ QIOSS£0/TO/90 Qa 9IOZ/10/90 £L'0I- 91'1796 161,96- 08T'bS6- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT %OOO'S L8b£ZLO#'I00d VWNd Od £OOZ/T/ZI 00WId-SSdO £OOZ/I/ZT WZIS.LONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOObMAXTOKC QIO21SEO/10/90 QQ 81OZ/IO/LO bT'SOT- IS'tOS'E 99'609'E- OIS'bOS'E- 0000'00I £OOZ/I/ZT %000'S 6Z9IZLO#100d VWNd dd EOOZ/I/Z I OOW Id-SSdO EOOZ/T/Zi WH21ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS000NfMTObIE QI Osseo/T0/90 QQ 91OZ/10/90 OS'LZb'T- 6E'E8S'Lb 68'010'6b- 06E'£8S'Lb- 0000'001 £OOZ/I/ZT %000'S 69£OZLO#'IOOd VWN3 Qd £OOZ/i/Z T OOWId-USdO EOOZ/T/ZI WSS.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOSi�JMIOKc QI OSS£0/TO/LO QQ 8TOZ/10/LO S£'OOT- 9T'Z£8'L IS'Z£6'L- 09I'Z£8'L- 0000'00I EOOZ/I/ZT %OOO'S 6T£06LO#'I00d VWNd Od £OOZ/I/Z I OOWId-USdO EOOZ/i/ZI WSZJ,ONO'I •ZOZZZSLOgSOOTSONTObTE QI OSSEO/IO/LO QQ 8IOZ/I0/LO Z9'bL- L6'£Z8'S 69'868'9- 0L6'£Z8'9- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT 0/6000'S 99££ILO#'I00d VWNA dd EOOZ/I/ZT OOWId-SZcIO £OOZ/T/ZI MialONO'I 'ZOZZZSLOdS0OZSdNTObTE QT OSS£0/IO/90 QQ 8TOZ/10/90 I8'OZ- EL'£69 tiS'bTL- O£L'E69- 0000'001 EOOZ/I/ZT %OOO'S bb££TLO#'IOOd VWNd Qd asBg aqua aqua asd/sa:ggs asBg aiva papod*H uolidliasaa adAl ssol/uTUD ION ;unourd ;803 aaT2d *Iva 014308 UW L a;sa opsay IIVxI3 :snllns EOOZ/TE/ZT - EOOZ/T/ZT 0a00i000osao-aalvarzosmoa-asoo asn :Aouauno asBg "oBo400 uopoesusiy Aq papodag 6009ms :al uodag us;aa uoiiossusiy tPua"Jolm �Z £o0Z/T/Z T OOW Ici-HSdo £OOZ/i/ZT WNS'I'�JNOI :ZOZZZSL0dS009Qfit£ObT£ QI Osseo/To/TT aa8TOZ/TO/TT St"901- £0'SOE'8 8b'bib'8- 0£0'80£'8- 0000*001 £OOZ/T/ZT %OOO'S 08EOSL0#100d VWN3 ad EOOZ/T/Z T OOW Id-NSdO £OOZ/T/ZI WS21ON01 :ZOZZZSLOASO0zvnr£Ot7TE aI OSS£0/TO/T T as 8TOZ/TO/I I ££'LTE'SZ TL'Tb9'SZ- 0££'LT£'S7,- 0000'OO1 EOOZ/T/ZT %O00'S LL£OSLO#100d VWN3 ad £o0Z/T/ZT OOWId-NNdO £OOZ/T/ZT WNS,L ON01 �ZOZZZSL03SO001LOCOVIc (]IOSS£0/TO/TI aa8IOZ/Io/ZI OL'SE- 9b'98L'Z 9i'ZZ8'Z- 09b'98L'Z- OOOO'OOT £OOZ/T/ZT 0/G000'9 6688bLO#100d VWMd ad £OOZ/T/Z T OOWId-NSdO £OOZ/T/ZT WNS.L JNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSO06NNJ£ObT£ a1 OSSEO/10/60 as 81OZ/10/80 61'ZT- S9'196 b8'£96- 099'126- OOOO'OOT £OOZ/T/ZT %000'S OOb8i7LO#100d VWNd ad £OOZ/T/Z I 0OWId-H2d0 £OOZ/T/ZT WE511ON0I:ZOZZZS b LOdSOOOX£3£OI£ :a102S£0/10/TT as 91OZ/10/IT OZ'TZ- ZL'bS9'T Z6'SL9'1- OZL'bS9'1- 0000*001 £OOZ/T/ZT 0/6000'9 t,16LbLO#100d VWNd ad £OOZ/T/Z T 0OWId-HSd0 £OOZ/T/Zi WN21ON01 :ZOZZZSLOdSOObZ£8£obi£ (ITOSS£0/TO/60 as 8TOZ/10/60 89'11- L9'£06 91'216- OLS'E06- 0000'OOT EOOZ/I/ZT %OOO'S 9M7i7LO#100d VWNd ad £ooZ/T/Z T OOW Id-NSd0 £00Z/I/Z T WHS.L ON01 :ZOZZZSLOASOOVSHB£OVI E GIOSS£0/TO/60 as 81OZ/IO/LO 66'89- 19'b8£'S OS'£Sb'S- OTS'b8£'S- 0000'OO1 £OOZ/I/ZI %OOO'S 800bbL0#100d VWMA ad EOOZ/1/Z I OOW Id-HSd0 £OOZ/T/ZT WNS.L ON01 :ZOZZZSL03SOOLHSMZobT£ aI OSS£0/T O/11 as 81 OZ/T O/01 68'Sb- Z£'T8S`£ TZ'LZ9`£- OZ£'T8S'£- 0000'OO1 £OOZ/I/ZT %000'S 8bLObLO#100d VWN3 ad £OOZ/T/ZT 0OWId-H2d0 £oOZ/T/ZT WHSION01 :ZOZZZSLO.dSO00t11mzObT£ aIOSs£o/To/oT as BIOZ/TO/OT ST'IST`T- b9'968`68 6L'966'06- Ob9'Sb8'68- 0000*001 £00Z/T/ZT 0/6000'9 TLbObLO#100d VWNJ ad EOOZ/I/Z T 00WId-N3do £OOZ/T/ZT WN21 ONO'I •ZOZZZ9L035OOZOmnzobT£ QIOSS£0/TO/OT as 8TOZ/10/01 L6'bE- Z£'6ZL'Z 6Z't,9L'Z- OZ£'6ZL'Z- 0000'OO1 EOOZ/I/ZI %000'S L8b8£LO#100d VWNd ad asBg asBg assg - JBd/BOJBgg asBg -- -alga palxodag u0ild1jasaa adA , ssoZ/ui130 laH lunouiV lsoo aaF�d alga s plas UW L alga apses, ,IVKI3 `sn;vjs com/n/m ' EOOZA/ZT 000m000soo-a2umnosxoo-asoo asn :Souauno asag Ajo2a:tva uopossuusy Aq papodag 60ORM3 :ai:jjodwH 117840Q u014013sulaiy youagxloM SZ £006/i/ZT o0W1d-x2[dO EOOZ/i/Zi MalONO'I :ZOZZZSL03S00LAVMOoZ9£ :QI021SIO/TO/ZT QQ T£OZ/ST/ZT 8S'EZT'Z- 6S'£L8'Zb Li'L66'tbtb- 06S-£L8'Zb- 0000,001 £ooZ/T/ZI 0/6009'9 £ZEbLSO#'IOOd VWNJ Qd E00Z/i/Z T 00 W Id-N3d0 E00Z/T/ZT MIST JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS008t7Oaooz9E QIOSSZO/i0/LO QQ ZEOZ/Si/LO S£'I61- 88'E98'E 9Z'SSO'b- 088'E98'E- 0000'001 EOOZ/T/ZT 0/6009'9 610OLSO#'I00d VWN`J Qd E00Z/T/Z T OOW Id-2I2[dO EOOZ/i/ZT WEZI ONOI :ZOZZZSL03S00ZSZa0oZ9E :aI 33szo/To/Zo as Z£o6/sT/Zo 99'691- ZE'SZb'E 86'b6S'E- OZE'Szb'E- 0000'001 £00Z/T/ZT 0/6009'9 9896990#100d VWMO Qd £OOz/i/Z T OOWId-M3dO WN21ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOAS00Exbao0Z9E £OOZ/i/ZT QI O3SZO/TO/b0 QQ ZEOZ/Si/b0 69'S9L'I- Z6'TEE'SL TS'L60'LL- OZ6'TEE'SL- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT %009'9 99£6990#100d VWNJ Qd £OOZ/I/ZT OOWId-SEdO EOOZ/i/Zi WHRJ,ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SDOMAGOOM at OSSZO/10/60 as ZEOZ/91/60 96'OL£'Z- 8S'L98'Lb b8'8£Z'oS- 088'L98'Lb- 0000'001 EOOZ/T/ZT %009'9 Z199690#'I00d VWNJ dd EOOz/I/z I OOWId-XgdO EOOZ/T/Zi WHSJ. JNO'I :ZOZZZSL0ds3O82If'BEObT£ QI00SE0/10/11 QQ8TOz/10/11 8S'OS- bb'bL£'b ZO'SZb'b- Obtb'bL£'b- 0000'001 EOOZ/I/ZT 0/6000'S ZL£9SL0#'IOOd VWMA dd EOOz/I/Z T OOWId-83dO EOOZ/I/ZI WH31ONO'I :ZOZZZSLods00EV9Z�£Ob T£ QI02SE0/TO/II QQ 810Z/TO/zi OZ'TZT- Ob'69b'6 09'089'6- 00b'69b'6- 0000'001 EOOZ/i/zi %000'9 S9ISSLo#'I00d VWNd Qd £ooz/I/Z I O3WId-S3dO EOOZ/i/ZT M10.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSL0.3S00£ZVNEobTE QIOSSEO/TO/iT QQ8IOZ/10/iT SE'ZS bS'LZS'b 68'6LS'b- ObS'LZS'b- 0000'001 EOOZ/I/ZI %000'9 SZbESLO#'IOOd VWN3 Qd EOOZ/i/Z T 00 WId-H3d0 £OOZ/I/Zi M131ONO'I :Z0ZZZSL03S00THWIE0bIE QI02SE0/TO/ii QQ Sioz/TO/ZT OL'bb- LT'68b'E L8'EES'E- OLT'68b'E- 0000*001 £OOz/T/ZT 0/6000'S 0961SL0#'I00d VWN3 Qd EOOz/I/Z I 00 W Id-2I3dO £OOZ/i/Zi WH31L ONO'I :ZOZZZSL0.3soOz3 f'EObi£ QI00SE0/TO/TT au slot/10/ii 617'01- 89'818 Li'6Z8- 089'818- 0000'001 EOOZ/T/ZT 0/6000'S SttOSLO# TOOd VWNd (Id asull asBg assg s8d/sasBgg assg a;sQ papodag uoT;dFsosaQ adAl ssoZ/uFgJ :1aN ;unomv ;sod ao�id a;B(1 0114aS UW L a;BQ ap�,L ,IyHI3 :sn;s;S EOOZ/T E/Z T - EOOZ/T/Z T 000010000800-Q3.LTLQI70SNOO-aS3O asn :Aouauno assg Ajo2a:jEC) uoi4o8Suvi L Aq papoda21 60ORMS :QI31odoa 118:1aa u01;385Li8IZ tpva".IOM 97 COOZ/i/Zi 00WId-N3d0 £00Z/T/ZT W2I3.L ONO'I :ZoZZZSLotlS309V.LE160Z9C :QI03S86/10/90 QQ 8ZOZ/91/90 OS'89£- S8'6Eb'L S£'808'L- OS8'6Cb'L- 0000'001 £00Z/T/ZT 0/6009'9 Sb899tb0#100d VWN9 Qd £OOZ/T/Z 1 OOW Id-NOCIO £OOZ/T/ZI W213'I'`JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS008b3V6OZ9£ :CII03S86/10/60 QQ 8ZOZ/Si/60 Lb'6ZZ'T LlIIF,'bZ OL'i86'ZZ- OLI*IIZ'bZ- 0000'001 COOZ/T/ZT 0/6000'9 99999VOC100d VWNO Cld £OOZ/T/Z 1 00WId-N3dO £OOZ/I/ZI WZI31ONO'I :ZOZZZSLO�S00£.L3V60Z9£ :GI 03S86/10/80 QQ 8ZOZ/91/80 Zi'£LO'T 8i'Z£l'TZ 90'690'OZ- 08i'Z£i'iz- 0000'00I EOOZ/1/61 0/6000'9 9bSS9b0#'I00d VWN9 (id £00Z/1/Z T 00 W Id-2I3dO £OOZ/i/ZT WN211.9N0'I •ZOZZZSL03S00£SSa80Z9£ :CII 03S86/10/01 QQ 8ZOZ/ST/01 L6'£9 SL'69Z'T 8L'961'1- OSL'69Z'T- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT O/o000'9 b18LS170#'IOOd VWN9 ad £OOZ/T/Z I 00W Id-213dO £OOZ/T/Zi WNS I'`JNO I :ZOZZZSL03S000'IhNd8OZ9£ :QI OSS86/10/10 QQ 8ZOZ/Si/I0 66'T- IT'OV Oi'Zb- Oii'Ob- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZI %009'9 1986bb0#'IOOd VWN9 Od £OOZ/I/Zi 00WId-d2dO EOOZ/i/Zi W2[21ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOJSO06N.LdLOZ9£ :GI 03S86/IO/So as SZOZ/81/90 60'Z OZ.'Tb I1'6£- OOZ'lb- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT %000'9 LSOS£b0#'I00d VWN9 Qd £00Z/I/Z.I 00WId-HSCIO WM31 0N01 :ZOZZZSL03500£Z0fT90Z9£ EOOZ/I/ZI :d108S96/10/b0 QQ 9ZOZ/SI/b0 66'SZ- £L'bZS Z4'099- 0£L'bZS- 0000'001 £00Z/I/Z I 0/,AOOS'9 68C I Zb0#'IOOd VWN9 Cld COOT/I/Z I 00WId-N3dO £OOZ/1/Z[ WN3.L I)NO'l :ZOZZ.Z9LOAS00SbSWTOZ9£ U(03SZ0/IO/ZI QQ Z£OZ/Si/iI Ob'691- 86'6Ib'£ 8C'68S'£- 086'61VC- 0000'001 COOZ/l/Zl 0/60OS'9 6£bL8SO#'I00d VWN9 (id £OOZ/l/Z I 00WId-HOdO EOOZ/i/Zi WN310NO'I :ZOZZZSLOAS00ZZOWIOZ9£ :QI 03SZO/10/90 QQ ZCOZ/ST/90 81'08- 89'819'I 98'869'I- 089'819'1- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT 0/600S'9 LIIL8S0#'I00d VWN9 1Jd £OOZ/T/Z i 00 W Id-213dO £OOZ/T/Zi Mial9N0'1 :ZOZZZSL03SO09(idxooZ9£ :a103ST0/IO/I I QQ T£OZ/ST/II Z6'8L- 0£"£691 ZZ'ZL9'1- 00£'£6S'l- 0000'00I £OOZ/i/Zl 0/6009'9 b9£SLSO#'IOOd VWN9 (ld asBg - asgg asBg =$d/sasBgg assg -- a;BQ papodag -- uopdixasaa adel ssoj/upet) Said ;unouiV :1800 aoiid aVOQ 0144as usiy a;sU apvX L livrli3 ` MIns £OOZ/TE/ZT - £OOZ/I/ZT 0000100OJS00-Q7.LvQI70SX00-Q500 QSn :6ouazzn3 asas dio2a3lea uozjaysuszy ,&q papodag 600sms :ai podag ITB;aQ T:T0140usuri'L ipuagxloM L Z £OOZ/I/Z I OO W Id-HSd0 £OOZ/T/ZT WNS'L 0N0'I :ZOZZZSLOESOOEA9M6OZ9£ QI 02SS6/I0/60 QQ 8ZOZ/Si/60 66'0 ZS'6I £9'8I- OZ9'6I- 0000'001 EOOZ/T/ZT %000'9 ZSb£Sb09700d VWN`J dd EOOZ/T/ZT 00WId-2I9d0 £OOZ/T/Zi W2IS,L0N0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO09d£S6OZ9£ GIOSS86/i0/0T QQ 8ZOZ/S1/01 06'E9T'Z.- 6S'OII'Sb 6b'bLZ'Lb- 06S'OII'Sb- 0000'001 £OOZ/I/ZT %009'9 86SO8170#100d VWMO Qd £OOZ/T/Z I 00WId-ZISd0 £OOZ/T/ZT Wass,9NO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO06.LAa6OZ9E QI02IS66/10/10 QQ 6ZOZ/S1/10 TO'SIL- 6L'SO6't l 08'OZ9'SI- 06L'906'bT- 0000'00I £OOZ/I/ZI %OOS'9 9Z98Lb0#'IOOd VWNO Qd EOOZ/T/ZI 00WId-H3d0 EOOZ/T/ZI WS91ON01 :ZOZZZSLOdSOOLSZW6OZ9£ QI DSS86/10/90 QQ 8ZOZ/SI/90 LZ'b9S- 8£'£9L'II S9'LZ£'ZI- 08E'E9L'I1- 0000'001 EOOZ/T/Zi 0/6009'9 Ib09Lti0#'I00d VWN`J ad £OOZ/T/Z T 00 W Id-H3d0 £OOZ/i/ZT Wa3i.ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO08HXS6OZ9E QIOSS86/10/11 QQ8ZOZ/91/11 £6'ti £T'L6 OZ'Z6- 0£i'L6- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT %000'9 88969b0#'I00d VWM9 Qd £OOZ/I/Z T 00 W Id-d3d0 EOOZ/I/ZT WN310N0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO0O0HQ6OZ9E QI 0SS86/10/80 QQ 8ZOZ/ST/80 L£'OIZ'b b6'T16'Z8 LS'TOL'SL- Ob6'I16'Z8- 0000*001 £OOZ/I/ZT %OOO'9 6££S9b0#'I00d VWX0 dd £OOZ/I/Z T 00W Id-NSd0 £OOZ/T/ZT WM31ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOObdHQ60Z9E QI0SSS6/TO/SO QQ 8ZOZ/ST/SO Z8'I £6'SE TT'b£- OE6'SE- 0000'001 EOOZ/T/ZT %000'9 0££89b0#'IOOd VWNo Qd EOOZ/T/ZT OOWId-2I21d0 £OOZ/T/Zi WSSI0N0'I :ZOZZZSLOdS00bWS06OZ9E QI 02S86/10/40 QQ 8ZOZ/SI/LO OZ'bZ- GS'88b L4719- OLS"88b- 0000'00I EOOZ/I/ZT %OOS'9 Z9089b0#'I00d VWN`J (ld £OO Z/I/Z T OO W Id-2ISd0 £OOZ/T/Zi WZIS,L ONO-1 :ZOZZZSLOdSOOZX006OZ9E QI OSS86/10/01 QQ 8ZOZ/S1/01 00'8Z L£'ISS LE'£ZS- OLE'199- 0000'001 £OOZ/T/ZT 0/6000'9 98ZL9tb0#'IOOd VWNI) Qd EOOZ/I/Z T 00 W Id-S3d0 £OOZ/T/ZI WS3J,0N0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOLaOO6OZ9£ QI OSS86/10/01 QQ 8ZOZ/S1/01 IO'Z 6b'6E 8tb'LE- 0617'6£- 0000'001 EOOZ/T/ZT %000'9 6LZL9b0#'IOOd VWNO Qd assg asBg asug iad/saJsgg assg a;8a papodaa uoT;djxosaQ adl, ssoZ/uFv J ;aH .4unouty 4so3 aalid a;BQ 0T3;0g U VJ L awa opw,y [160001AS IdHId :sn3 inS £OOZ/T£/ZT - £OWT/ZT 0000i0000soo-aa.Lvariosnroo-asap asn :Aouauna aseg Ajo2o4v3 uoponsu7n L Aq papodag :aI podan jiB;aQ u01;313su73.I1 ipuagx-joM 8Z £OOZ/T/Zi OOWId-2T3dO EOOZ/i/Zi WHSJ.JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS000VdS0TZ9E QIOdS66/TO/tO QQ 6ZOZ/SI/t0 tS'tL 98'L9t'i ZE'E6E'T- 098'L9t'I- 0000'OOT £OOZ/T/ZI 0/o000'9 LT6005;0#100d VWN`J dd EOOZ/T/Z i 00 WId-mHdO £OOZ/I/ZT WH2J,`JNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOSSaa0TZ9£ QI03S66/TO/ZO QQ 6ZOZ/ST/ZO 06'0 69'LT 6L'9i- 069'LT- 0000'OO1 EOOZ/T/ZI %000'9 ESI66t0#'I00d VWNJ Qd EOOZ/T/Z I OOWId-NgdO £OOZ/I/ZT WH31L`JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOStdMOIZ9E QI OSS86/TO/ZT QQ 8ZOZ/ST/ZT ZZ'SOT 90'ZLO'Z 178'996'I- 090'ZLO'Z- 0000"001 EOOZ/I/ZI %000'9 Eb£L6t0#'IOOd VWN`J Qd EOOZ/T/Z I OOWId-S3dO EOOZ/I/ZT W2Id.L JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOAsoOtNaW0TZ9E QI 0ZS66/10/10 aQ 6ZOZ/ST/10 tL'989 OZ'tSS'II 9b'L96'OT- OOZ'tSS'TT- 0000'OOT £OOZ/T/ZT %000'9 T9t96t0#'IOOd VWND Qd EOOZ/T/Z T OOW Id-S3dO EOOZ/I/ZT W2SIONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOtA2Id0TZ9E QI 03566/TO/TO QQ 6ZOZ/SI/10 6Z'OEZ 88'tES't 69't0£`t- 088't£S't- 0000'OOI EOOZ/I/ZT %000'9 £OTT6t0#'100d VWNO Qd EOOZ/T/Z i OOWId-H2ldO £OOZ/T/ZI W2IdJ,`JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO9WAVOTZ9E GI OSS86/T O/Z T QQ 8ZOZ/9T/ZI lZ'i LL'EZ 99'7,Z- OLL'£Z- 0000'OO1 £OOZ/T/ZI 0/o000'9 OZL98t0#'I00d VWNO Qd EOOZ/T/Z I OOWId-2I2dO EOOZ/T/ZI WN21 JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO9ASA60Z9E QI02ST0/TO/80 QQ TEOZ/ST/80 96'ZZ9- L6'9LS'ZT Z6'661'ET- OL6'9LS'ZT- 0000'00T EOOZ/T/ZT %OOS'9 £OLS8t0#'I00d VWNJ Qd EOOZ/I/Z I 00 W Id-M'adO EOOZ/I/ZT WH21J.ONOI :ZOZZZSLOdS0O9�A60Z9£ QIOOsio/TO/80 QQ TEOZ/ST/80 860TE- Ot'8LZ'9 8£'689'9- OOt'8LZ'9- 0000'OO1 EOOZ/T/ZT 0/6OO9'9 Z89S8t0#'fOOd VWM0 Qd EOOZ/i/Z T OOWId-2I2ldO EOOZ/I/Zi WN3J.ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS0O8£NA60Z9E QI 0dSi0/T0/LO QQ I£OZ/SI/LO E8'S66- LI'SOT'OZ 00'10T'TZ- OLI'S0I'OZ- 0000'OOI EOOZ/I/ZI %OOS'9 OI9S8170#'IOOd VWN`J Qd EOOZ/T/ZT OOWId-H3dO £OOZ/T/Zi WU3J.ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOASOOT`J'IA60Z9E QI03STO/10/90 QQ ICOZ/S1/90 TL'tZt'T- 6L'E9L'SZ OS'88T'0£- 06L'E9L'8Z- 0000'OO1 EOOZ/I/ZT O/o00S'9 4ZSS8t0#'IOOd VWMD Qd asBg asBg assg isd/sassgs 09130 — a;BQ papodag — uopdposaa ads, ssol/uFBjJ dam ;unouid :Isoa aaFsd 0:110Q 9144as uBsy a;BQ apwj, 7VHI3 :rnlulS EooZ/T£/ZT - SooZ/T/ZT 000aioaoosao-aazvarrosxoa-as3o asn :6auaunO asBg dio2a4TQo uoi;assuBjZ Aq papodag eoosena :ul uoaax ps;aa uoi;ossul3jj, tpua43ll0m 69 £OOZ/i/Zi OOWId-2I3dO £OOZ/i/ZT WH3,L ONO'I :ZOZZZSL035O0£JTS3£iZ9£ QIO3SZ0/TO/i0 QQ Z£OZ/SI/IO 8S'SbZ- EO'996'b T9'£OZ'S- 0£0'S96'b- 0000'001 £007./T/Zi 0/oOOS'9 ZZ£ZSSO#'IOOd VWNJ Qd £OOZ/i/Z i OOWId-NzdO £00Z/T/Zi WNSIL ONO'I•ZOZZZSL03SOOZSNAZTZ9£ QI 03Si0/TO/ZO QQ i£OZ/SI/ZO I6'4- 661,9I 06'Z4T- 0661,91- 0000'OOI £OOZ/i/Zi 0/6OOS'9 SILLtS;O#'IOOd VWNO Qd £OOZ/i/Z T OOWId-sadO £OOZ/i/ZT WH31LONO'I �ZOZZZSL03SOOMOAZIZ9£ QIO3Si0/IO/b0 QQ i£OZ/ST/b0 46'0- LS'61 bS'OZ- OLS'61- 0000'OO1 EOOZ/i/Zi 0/6OOS'9 ZISLbSO#'IOOd VWNO Qd £OOZ/i/Zi OOWId-usdO £OOZ/i/Zi WHZI ONO'T :ZOZZZSL03SOOi321WZTZ9£ QI 03STO/TO/ZO QQ i£OZ/ST/ZO b8'OOL- bb'6bi'bT 8Z'OS8'bi- Of tb'6i7l'bi- 0000'001 £OOZ/I/Zi 0/a00S'9 SSSL£SO#lood VWNO Qd £OOZ/T/Zi O0WId-H3dO £OOZ/T/ZI m3lON0'I:ZOZZZSL03SOOT£3QZTZ9£ :QI O3S10/10/170 QQ T£0Z/9I/£0 £8'11£'£- LC*Ib0'69 OZ'£S£'ZL- OL£'T170'69- 0000'OO1 £OOZ/i/Zi 0/6OO9'9 06Z0£SO#100d VWNO Qd £OOZ/I/Z I O0WId-2I3dO £OOZ/T/Zi M21L ONO7 :ZOZZZSL03SO0£SZOZTZ9£ QIO3ST0/i0/b0 QQ T£OZ/ST/ti0 TZ'£SI- LT'£60'£ 8E'9bZ'£- OLI'£60'£- 0000'OOT £OOZ/i/ZI %OOS'9 £S00£90#100d VWNO Qd £00Z/I/Z l O3WId-2T3dO E00Z/[/Z I Waal ONO'I :ZOZZZSL Z3 OdSOO 'If i 1z9£ Q173S66/I0/LO QQ 6ZOZ/Si/LO 68'9£S- 9b'Z61'1I S£'6ZL'TT- 09676i'I1- 0000*001 COW I/Zi °iA0S'9 9ZE17190#100d VWNO (Id £OOZ/i/Z i OOWId-213dO COW 1/Z[ WSM ONOI :ZOZZZS40360O90901 T Z9£ 0I 33S66/10/1 1 QQ 6ZOZ/Si/I I SL'0- 8T'ST £6'ST- 081'91- 0000'001 COW I/Z1 0/0009*9 S£ZZiSO#"IOOd VWNJ Qd £OOZ/I/Z T O3WId-H3dO £OOZ/T/ZT WHSI`)NO'I:ZOZZZSL03S0006AA0TZ9E QI O3S66/1040 QQ 6ZOZ/5;1/tO ZZ'Ob O1'Z6L S8'TSL- OO1'Z6L- 0000'OOI £OOZ/T/Zi 0/0000'9 9£99090#'iOOd VWNO Qd COW T/61 O3WId-Zl3dO EOOZ/T/ZT WHSILONO1 :ZOZZZSL03SOOSS3AOTZ9£ QI 03S66/10/£0 QQ 6ZOZ/91/£0 L6'991'1 bb'9Z9'IZ- OTb'£SL'ZZ- 0000'OO1 EOOZ/i/ZT 0/6000'9 SS££OSO#'IOOd VWNO Qd assg asss assg rad/saiBgs assg - -- n7sa papodag uopduosaQ addy ssoZ/uFve 40K ;unowv 4803 aoud 04Ba al33as usxy a;sa apssy zvl�u3 : s £ow/T£/ZT - £ooZ/I/ZI 0000T000O830-affad(urosxoO-asoo asn :Sauauno assg AaoNalsC) uol;oesusiy Aq papodag 6009&9 :ai 3uoden ilmaa uosossusl<y ipuagXlo/A 0£ SIM3'IVAInb3 HSVO 59 HSVO s3I,LRInlvw 8E'OTs'9£- t6'ZOs'tT9'T ZE'£T£'TS9'T- Oti6'ZO8't,19'1- :3sVgsimap vd IddI3NIud'Iv,LO,L 8E'oTS'9£- t,6'Z08'b19'1 ZE'£T£'Ts9'T- Otb6'Z08'iT9'T- :3sdg S3L ranO'3s mmoo i aami Tv,Lo.L 8£'OTS'9£- 106'ZO8'tT9'T Z£'£T£'TS91- OV6'Z08't+T9'T- wiioa 's'n s iruams aino3 TI a3XIj iv.Loi £Ooz/9i/zT OOWId-SSdO £OOZ/9i/Zi M21'ONO'I •ZOZZZSL03S306XNtHL£8£ QI 03S0£OZ/9I/ZO 00'0 £8'Lt0'Lz £8'Lt0'Lz- 0£S'Lt0'Lz- 0000'00T £OOZ/9i/ZI I'd NVA Hri 6-000Z 2T1.OIWEN GIO VWNO (id £o0Z/i/Z I OOW Id-2I3dO £OOz/T/zT WH31LON0'I :ZOZZZSL03sooszNOSZZ9£ QI 03S00/IO/SO uo 0£Oz/OZ/SO t8'006 61'869'88 S£'L6L'L8- 061'869'88- 0000'00T £OoZ/i/ZI 0/0009'9 X80t080#'IOOd II VWNO Qd EOOz/I/Z T OOWId-NgdO EOOz/i/zT mail JI ol :ZOZZZSL035OOtWNOSZz9£ :alossoo/Io/to as o£oz/oz/to 96'ZL SS'OSO'8 69'LL6'L- OSS'OSO'8- 0000'001 £ooz/I/ZT IS ZIVA S6EO8OO#'I00d II VWNO Qd £OOZ/I/Zi OOWId-NgdO £OOz/i/ZI Mal ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03s3oozOOSZZ9£ GIO3SL6/TO/90 QQ LZOZ/OZ/9O 99'ZOE- L9'S£8'£T ££'8£T'tT- OL9'S£8'£T- 0000'00I £OOz/T/ZI %SL£'L W880080#100d II VWNO dd £OOz/T/Z i OOWId-2I3dO £OOz/i/zi W33.LONO'I :ZOZZZSLO.dSO06ZVOSZZ9£ QI 03S96/10/ZT QQ S8'LEI- So'£Z£'8 06'09t'8- OSO'£Z£'8- 0000'001 £OOZ/I/ZT 9ZOZ/OZ/ZT I'S ZIVA£Z008004'I00d II VWNO Qd £OOz/i/Z I OOW Id-2I3dO £OOz/i/Zi MalONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SO06ZOa£IZ9£ QIOSST0/I0/LO QQ T£OZ/Si/LO T£'SO£- Z6'£9T'9 6Z'69t'9- OZ6'£91'9- 0000'00I £OOZ/i/ZT %009'9 L101990#'I00d VWNO Qd £ooz/I/Z T OOW Id-SSdO £OOZ/I/ZT WH31ON0'I :ZOZZZSL03soo9fiS3£1Z9£ QI 03SZO/10/LO QQ Z£OZ/ST/LO S8'LS6- I£'8££'6T 91'96Z'OZ- OT£'S££'61- 0000'OOI £OOz/I/zi %OOS'9 699ZSSO#'IOOd VWNO Qd £ooz/I/Zi OOWId-NSdO EOOz/T/Zi Mal ONO'I •ZOZZZSL03SO09EM3£TZ9£ aI 03szo/Io/£o as z£oz/sI/Eo 9L'8Z9'1- zS'£88'zE 8z'ZIS't£- OZS'£88'Z£- 0000'001 £OOz/i/ZT %OOS'9 99tZSSO#'IOOd VWNO dd assg asBg assg sud/sassgg asBg a;sQ papodag uopdizosoa adAl ssoZ/uPID 4ON ;unouiV :Isoo aaF=d a;10Q 914408 us:y ova apssy ZVHI,3 'snla;s £OOZ/T£/ZI - £OOZ/l/ZT OOOOTOOOOSOo-as M70snioo-asao asn :AouamnO asBg Ajo2o;s3 uop*vsusjy Aq papodag 6009M3 :aT uodaM U134aa uonossusmy Transaction Detail Report M: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSGO0010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base U.S. DOLLAR MT FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC BOND 12/3/2003 100.0000 -200,000.000 -199,274.00 199,274.00 0.00 MATURITYSEC ID: 12/3/2003 313588QA6OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/3/2003 OPER-PIMCO MT FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 12/15/2003 100.0000 -800,000.000 -797,301.63 797,301.63 0.00 12/15/2003SECID: 12/15/2003 313588QN80CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/15/2003 OPER-PIMCO MT GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12/10/2003SEC 12/10/2003 100.0000 -2,800,000.000 -2,790,420.11 2,790,420.11 0.00 ID: 36959JZA4OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/10/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/10/2003 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR: -3,800,000.000 -3,786,995.74 3,786,995.74 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: -3,800,000.000 -3,786,995.74 3,786,995.74 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR MT BEAR STEARNS MTN#TR 00459 VAR RT 12/1/2003 100.0000 -900,000,000 -899,406.00 900,000.00 594.00 12/01/2003 DD 08/17/01SECID: 12/1/2003 073928VC40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO MT COLGATE PALMOLIVE MTN TR 00058 5.270%12/1/2003 100.0000 -300,000.000 -308,808.00 300,000.00 -8,808.00 12/01/2003 DD 11/24/98SECID: 12/1/2003 19416QCK40CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/1/2003 PIMCO MT PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC NTS 6.450% 12/1/2003 100.0000 -500,000.000 -519,405.00 500,000.00 -19,405.00 12/01/2003 DD 12/01/98SEC ID: 12/1/2003 695629CE30CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/1/2003 PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR -1,700,000.000 -1,727,619.00 1,700,000.00 -27,619.00 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: -1,700,000.000 -1,727,619.00 1,700,000.00 -27,619.00 TOTAL MATURITIES BASE: -5,500,000.000 -5,514,614.74 5,486,995.74 -27,619.00 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY 31 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL Trade Date �v Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR SW TO DELIVER OFF FRACTIONAL UNIT FNMA 12/1/2003 -0.010 -0.01 0.00 -0.01 POOL#0555640SEC ID: 12/1/2003 31385XHR10CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO SW TO BRING ACCOUNT INTO BALANCE WITH 12/30/2003 -15,260.000 -13,462.89 0.00 -13,462.89 12/31/03SEC ID: 9128272M30CSF07522202:12/31/2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12/30/2003 SW TO BRING ACCOUNT INTO BALANCE WITH 12/30/2003 -3,240.000 -3,533.00 0.00 -3,533.00 FACTOR 1.14516SEC ID: 12/31/2003 9128273T70CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12/30/2003 SW TO BRING ACCOUNT INTO BALANCE WITH 12/30/2003 -13,780.000 -15,313.06 0.00 -15,313.06 12/31/03SEC ID:9128274Y50CSF07522202: 12/31/2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12/30/2003 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR -32,280.010 -32,308.96 0.00 -32,308.96 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: -32,280.010 -32,308.96 0.00 -32,308.96 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY BASE: -32,280.010 -32,308.96 0.00 -32,308.96 INTEREST CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR IT FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCSEC ID: 12/3/2003 200,000.000 726.00 726.00 0.00 313588QA60CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/3/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/3/2003 IT FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 12/15/2003 800,000.000 2,698.37 2,698.37 0.00 12/15/2003SECID: 12/15/2003 313588QN80CSF07522202: LONGTERM 12/15/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 12/10/2003SEC 12/10/2003 2,800,000.000 9,579.89 9,579.89 0.00 ID: 36959JZA40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/10/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/10/2003 32 Workbench v Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 1 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 Status: FINAL, Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base CW SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ NET OF 12/31/2003 0.000 -240.97 -240.97 0.00 OVERNIGHT INTERESTSEC ID: 12/31/2003 990000PJ40CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/31/2003 PIMCO CW SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ NET OF 12/31/2003 0.000 -374.57 -374.57 0.00 OVERNIGHT INTERESTSEC ID: 12/31/2003 990000PJ40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/31/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/3/2003 0.000 1,241.44 1,241.44 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO 12/3/2003 IT DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 12/3/2003 0.000 868.65 868.65 0.00 9960852470CSF07511 102: LIQUID OPER- 12/1/2003 PIMCO 12/3/2003 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR: 3,800,000.000 14,498.81 14,498.81 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: 3,800,000.000 14,498.81 14,498.81 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR IT BANK OF AMERICA CORP SR GBL NT 6.6250% 12/15/2003 500,000.000 16,562.50 16,562.50 0.00 06/15/2004 DD 06/15/99SECID: 12/15/2003 066050CW30CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/15/2003 PIMCO IT BEAR STEARNS MTN#TR 00459 VAR RT 12/1/2003 900,000.000 514.50 514.50 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 08/17/01SECID: 12/1/2003 073928VC40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT 5.500% 12/1/2003 1,500,000.000 41,250.00 41,250.00 0.00 11/30/2007 DD 12/02/02SECID: 11/30/2003 125581ADOOCSF07522202: LONGTERM 12/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT COLGATE PALMOLIVE MTN TR 00058 5.270% 12/1/2003 300,000.000 7,905.00 7,905.00 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 11/24/98SECID: 12/1/2003 19416QCK40CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/1/2003 PIMCO 33 Workbench £Ooz/9Z/ZI 00WId-ZI2dO £00Z/T/ZI WH21ONO1 :ZOZZZSLOdSOOLbAXI LEI£ QIOSS£0/i0/i0 as 81OZ/10/ZO 00'0 LL'bSL LL'bSL OSS'89£'Z £00z/9z/zT %000'9 I£9179Zo#100d VWNd ILI £Ooz/9Z/zi 00WId-sacio £00Z/T/Zi WS21.LONO'I:ZOZZZSL0ASOO17EMTLET£ (IIOSSZO/T0/0T QQ LTOZ/TO/IT 00'0 Z7,'6LS`£ ZZ'6LS`£ 0£b'Sbz'£T £Ooz/9z/zT 0/6000'S OISbSZO#'IOOd VWNd .LI £Ooz/SI/zT 00WId-S3dO £OOZ/ST/ZT WN21J.ONO'I :ZOZZZSLodSOOZXPW6SET£ QI OSSTo/zZ/90 QQ 900Z/S1/90 00'0 0S'L£6'46Z 09'L£6'L6Z 000'000'09£'I I £Ooz/SI/zT %OSZ'S SEZU NSSV 0,LW'ILVN'IV'HZUZd if £ooz/9 T/z T O0 WId-S3dO £OOZ/T/TT W2ZIONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO£ZMS8b£T£ QI OSSL6/10/ZT QQ 8ZOZ/I0/TO 00'0 TS'99Z 19'99Z 098'006'£ £Ooz/SI/ZT 0/ot,8£'9 b909-8L#dfIOHO OW'IHd ,LI £Ooz/9I/z T O3WId-H3dO £OOZ/I/zT MIZI ONO,] :ZOZZZSLodSOObVLT.L££T£ :QIOSS£6/TO/Ti QQ£ZOZ/ST/TT 00'0 ZO'OTO'ST ZO'OTO'ST 0Z0'0T0'9T £OOZ/9I/ZT 0/6000'9 ZOZ9T USS d10 SSV'IOI.L'InW OW'IHd .LI £OOZ/S T/z I 00WId-S2dO £OOZ/T/T i WNS.L`JNO'I �ZOZZZSLOdS00S6S01E£iE :(II OSSL6/10/ZT QQ Z£OZ/SI/80 00'0 Oz'01 Oz'OT OOz'OT £OOZ/ST/ZI JA ZIVA V ES SES 01W SSV'IOI.L'IfIW OWIHd JA £OOZ/S I/ZI OOWId-2I2dO £OOZ/I/I I wasi,ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS00S6SO,L££T£ QI0SSL6/TO/ZT QQ ZEOZ/91/80 00'0 Tb'98L'£ Ib'98L'£ OSZ'£6L'L£ £OOZ/ST/ZI IS SVA V£S 2I3S O.LW SSV'IOLL'IfIW 0W'IHd ,LI EOoz/S T/Z I OOWId-S3dO EOOZ/I/ZI WS21L ONO'I =ZOZZZSL03500zVWgQ8zT£ QI0SS66/TO/£0 QQ tOOZ/10/01 00'0 b9'96b b9'S6b 0£9'L6 EOoz/SI/ZT 016009'L £S£0-VO#df102IJ OW'IHd if £o0Z/Z/Zi OOWId-S3dO £OOZ/I/TT MIS.LONO'I :ZOZZZSLodS00£SJ866Z0£ QI 32S66/TZ/01 QQ 0£OZ/10/ZI 00'0 69'TZ6'9 69'IZ6'S 091'b9L E00Z/Z/ZT 0/600S'L09I11-000#2JIVdNOO&NnH/dWM ,LI £Ooz/ST/zi OOWId-H2[dO E00Z/ST/ZT W2I31ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOSEWIL£ZZZ QI OSS6646/90 QQ bOOZ/91/90 00'0 0o'Sz9'S8 00'SZ9'98 000'000'OOS'z £OOZ/ST/ZI %098'9,LN ONI SN'l SWOH S(lIMAZILNnOO LI aqua eggs aqua Jua/sajBgg asBg aiuQ papodag uoiidiiasaQ ad9l sso'I/uiuJ dam ;unouir :1803 aaFid a3ua ai;;as sissy a;uQ apu�y 7VHI3 'sn3in8 EOOZ/T E/Z I - coo /T/Z T OOOOTOOODS30-affZV OSMOo-asoo aSA :6ououno asug Sjo2a4BZ) uopoesuvil AQ popoda21 60oaMS :ar asodag Zx1340Q uoTTausuBiy youag3polA S£ £ooz/9Z/Zi OOWId-NSdO EOOZ/I/Zi WZ131ONO1 :ZOZZZSLOJSOO80ZAt8£T£ QIO3S00/TO/LO QQ SI07,/10/90 00'0 68'OL8 68'OL8 Ott'tS9'9 £OOZ/9Z/Zl %000'9 TSbSESO#'IOOd VWNi JI £OOZ/9Z/Z l OOW Id-SgdO EOOZ/T/ZT Waal ONO'I :ZOZZZSLois000maa£BEIE QIOSS66/T0/60 QQ tTOZ/To/60 00'0 L6'688 L6'688 OL9'Z6Z'T EOOZ/9Z/ZI %000'9 6t96090#'IOOd VWN3 ILI EOOZ/9Z/Z T OOWId-NSdO EOOZ/T/ZT WN21LONO'I :ZOZZZSL0.3SOOZd.00l8£T£ :GI O2S66/10/Zo QQ tIOZ/TO/Zo 00'0 L8'89E L8'89E 06Z'EZ6'4 EOOZ/9Z/ZT %000'9 Z8t9St01t'fOOd VWN3 .LI £ooz/9Z/ZT OOWId-'dgdO EOOZ/T/ZT Mal 0N0'I :ZOZZZSLodSOOT Lvx9L£i E QI 33S£0/10/60 QQ 8107,/10/60 00'0 9E'ItL'9 9£'TbL'9 086'£LZ'01 £OOZ/9Z/ZT %000'S OCKS£0# IOOd VWNd .LI £OOZ/9Z/Zi OOWId-NgdO EOOZ/T/Zi Waal ONOI :ZOZZZSLOdSOOBWtI'9LEl£ :(II OSSEO/lo/TO as 8TOZ/10/10 00'0 9Z'8£T 9Z'SEi OLO'LLS Eooz/9Z/Zl %000'S 8ZELS£o#'I00d VWNJ LI EOOZ/9Z/Z I OOWId-MZdO EOOZ/T/Zi WSSIONO1 :ZOZZZSL09S0OOWZ.Li7LET£ QI OSS66/10/60 QQ tTOZ/1040 00'0 89'960'1 89'960'1 08t'£SL'9 £OOZ/9Z/ZT %000'9 086EZE0#100d VWNq LI Eooz/9Z/Z I OO W Id-HSdO EOOZ/T/ZT Wd2'I'ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03 t3'SOO9IIL£T£ QI021SEo/To/TI as gloz/To/ZT 00'0 SZ'99i't SZ'991'17 096'ZZT'S £ooz/97,/Zi %000'S L86tSZO#100d VWNJ LI EOOZ/9Z/Zl O3WId-M3dO EOOZ/T/Zi WSSILDNO'I :ZOZZZSLoeiSOOIZS'IILEIE QI OaS£o/io/OT co BTOZ/IO/I I 00'0 LO'69S'T LO'699'I Ot8'Zt9'£ £OOZ/9Z/ZT %000'S ES6tSZ0#`IOOd VWNd LI EOOZ/9Z/ZT OOWId-MZdO EOOZ/T/Zi WNS'L omoli �ZOZZZSLOASOOE$O'ITL£T£ :GI O3SEo/10/90 as 81OZ/10/60 00'0 00'S6Z 00'S6Z 0££'tES E006/9Z/Zi %000'S 998179Z0#'IOOd VWNd LI £OOZ/9Z/Z I OO W Id-XgdO £OOZ/i/ZT W2Ial0MOq :ZOZZZSL0,3 }I SOO6ASTL£I£ QIossco/TO/So QQ STOZ/To/90 00'0 LE'6L9 L£"6L9 OSt'ZS9'I £ooz/9Z/ZT 0/o000'S 09L17SZ0#'IOOd VWNA LI asgg asgg asBg ilea/sazsgg asBg a;ga papodag uoi;dF�osaa ad�y ssoZ/ujvo lam ;unotud 4803 ao�sd alga aillaS UW L a;lea ap�y --------------- � cow/u/n - £OOZ/T/ZT 000010000Sao-UffLVUrr0sxO3-aS30 asn :AouamnO asug AjoBajua uoigovsusiy Aq popodag 600aM3 :Ql;iodag jxB;aQ uoi;ossuvil ipuagxaoM 9E £OOZ/9Z/Zi OOWId-2ISdO £QOz/i/zi WH2[.L ONO'I :ZOzzzSLOdS00ZSSXS8£T£ QI 0SS£0/i0/SO QQ STOZ/TO/90 00'0 ZI'8S£`I Z1'8S£`T OSL'bZ0`b £OOZ/9Z/6T %000'S SbSSSSO#100d VWNd .LI £OOZ/9z/Z I OOW Id-21SdO £OOz/I/Zi WaM JN0'I :ZOZZZSLodS00S6CIXS8£T£ CIi 03S£O/TO/SO QQ ££oz/TO/tbo 00'0 oZ'zi0't, OZ'zT0`b 008'091`6Z £ooz/9Z/61 %oOO'9 8ZSSSSO#'IOOd VWNd .LI £OOZ/9Z/7,1 OOWId-a3dO £OOZ/I/ZT W 'I N511ONO :ZOZZZSLOdS009mexs8£I£ GI 03S£0/1040 QCI 8IOZ/10/90 00'0 98'991 98'99T o£6'zLb £OOZ/9Z/zl %000'9 MG990#100d VWNd .LI £ooz/9z/zl 00WId-2I21d0 £OOZ/i/Zi Wzi3,I JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS00IAstAs8£T£ (II 02S£0/To/£0(I(I 8TOz/To/b0 00'0 1£'6Z9'I I£'6Z9'T OSS'LZ£'S £ooz/9z/zl 0/0000'S £9£S9SO#100d VWNd Il £OOz/9z/ZI 00WId-dgdO £OOz/I/ZI WHM JNO'I 'ZOZZZSLOdS00LSZMS8£I£ :(II 021S£O/TO/z0(IQ££Oz/TO/£o 00'0 £Z'zST'b £z'zST'b Ob8'8L£,9Z £OOz/9Z/zl 0/0000'9 S8ZSSS0#'IOOd VWNd It £OOZ/9Z/Z I 00WId-2ISdO £OOZ/i/zi M13.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLo3S00£ZfiMS8£I£ (II OSSzo/IO/II CI(I LIOz/TO/OI 00'0 09'8Z6 09'8Z6 089'ZOL,9 £OOz/9z/zT %000'9 IOISSSO#'IOOd VWNd It £ooz/9z/z l OOWld-N'Rdo £ooz/l/zI Wa3.L ONO-i ZoZZZSLOdSOOLIWISS£T£ C1133lszo/10/01 act z£oz/IO/iT 00'0 9I'8z0`I 9I'8Z0'T 009'Z£L'L £007./9Z/zl 0(000'9 866SbSO#'I00d VWNd LI £OOz/9z/z l 00Wld-82ldO £OOz/1/Z[ W83.L:INOl =ZOZZZSLOdS00LSDf S8£l£ (II 03SZO/l0/£0 CI(I LIOZ/10/£0 00'0 69'8ZS 69'8ZS 006'9£Z`b £OOZ/9z/zl 0/6000'9 0899b900'I00d VWNd Ii £ooz/9z/zl 00Wld-SSdO £OOz/i/ZI WM91ONOI :ZOZZZSLOdS000ZXHS8£l£ CII021ST0/10/01 (I(19IOz/IO/TI 00'0 6S'£9Z`9 6S'£9Z'9 OZ£'S£L`Lb £OOZ/9z/ZI %OOO'9 96ZSbSo#'I00d VWNd Ii £OOz/9z/61 001AIId-ZiSdO £OOZ/T/zI WZIS.LDNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS00TH0Mb8£T£ (II OSSOo/lo/zl (I(19IOz/To/To 00'0 LL'b£8'ST LL'b£8,81 08L'L69'LZT £OOz/9Z/zl %000'9 ZL99£SO#'I00d VWNd It aqua aqua aqua sad/sasugs - - aqua- a;BQ papodag --- uolidposaQ add, sso'I/ulvo jam ;unouiV ;503 aaFsd a4BQ auras uus1, opla opBsJ, 'IVMla mn4vjS EOOZ/T£/Z T - £OOZ/1/n 000010000soo-affcrraz7osnio3-as3o asn :6ouassn0 asua dio2a;B3 uopossuim L Aq papodag 600RM2 :aI podag 1184aQ uOTIolesuElZ EOOZ/9z/z i OOW Id-2IsdO £OOZ/i/Zi WZ131L`JNO"I :ZOZzzSLO.dSOOZHAN68£i£ aI DgSZO/10/ZO as LIOZ/10/0 00'0 ££'9bo'i £E'9t0'i 089'zsS'L £OOZ/9Z/ZI %000'9 ZiSO£90#1OOd VWNd li £OOZ/9z/zi OOWId-ZISdO £OOz/i/zi WSS.L`JNO'I :ZOZZZSL0,3S0O6d3M88£i£ QIosslo/i0/zi QQ 9ioz/i0/zi 00'0 1b'9S8 ib'9S8 OSL'90L £o0z/9Z/Zi 0/6000'9 tCL9190#'IOOd VWNd 11 £ooz/9Z/Zi O0WId-MSdO £OOz/I/Zi WHS,L ONOI :ZOZZZSL09SO0SLZ'I88£i£ a102Sio/i0/60 QQ 910Z/10/01 00"0 b8'IbS b8"1bS OL8'6ZI'S EOOz/9Z/zi %000'9 99£s090#'I00d VWN3 LI £007,/9Z/ZI O0WId-S3dO £OOz/i/zi WNN.L ONO] :ZOZZZSL03SOOIOWH88£I£ QI OSSIO/10/60 QQ 910Z/10/60 00'0 60'O16 60'O16 obb'b£8'9i £ooz/9Z/ZI %000'9 69ZS090#'IOOd VWNd .LI £ooz/9z/Z i OO W Id-2IddO E00Z/i/zi WH31ONO'I :Z0ZUSL0dSO096.LXL8CIE :GI 321SIO/10/80 as 910Z/10/60 00'0 6Z'08Z'i 6Z'O8Z'i o£L'ZbS'i £ooz/9Z/zi %000'9 9LEL6S097OOd VWN3 ILI cooz/gr/zl 00 W Id-2IddO £OOz/I/zi WH3.L 0NO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO8xc.LLB£I£ aI 02SI0/10/L0 QQ 9IOZ/10/LO 00'0 £S'b96 £91796 o£6'9L8'L £ooz/9Z/ZI 0/6000'9 z00b65;0#'IO0d VWNd LI £o0Z/9z/z I OOWId-2I3dO £OOZ/t/ZI W21d.L ONO-[ :ZOZZZSLOdSOOI6f QL8£I£ (II O:3Slo/lo/So QQ 9IOz/i0/SO 00'0 ZZ'88i'i Zz's8i'i 0££"bOZ'£ £OOZ/9Z/Zl 'W009 8880890#'I00d VWN3 11 £ooz/9Z/z t OOWld-S3dO £OOZ/I/Z l W631 ONO I ZOZ.ZZSLodSOO98AX98£i£ al O3SIO/10/bo as 9IOZ/10/b0 00'0 ££'106 ££'i06 086'bSi'S £ooz/9z/zl 0/,000"9 6EL9LS0#'I0Od VWNd 'LI £o0Z/9z/z I OOWId-N3dO EOOZ/i/Zi WSM ONO-I :ZOZZZSL0dsz)OZLf'X98EI£ (]IOESIO/i0/SO as 9ioz/10/SO 00"0 bb'LZ£ bb'LZ£ ob8'99£ £ooz/9Z/zi %000'9 9SE9L904100d VWN.3 LI £OOZ/9z/z i OOW I&NMO £OOZ/i/Zi W'8211 JNO'I •ZOZZZSLo3SOO89JXS8£i£ (II Z)as£o/to/90 as sioz/to/Lo 00"0 8£'869'b 8£"86917 OSS'SSb'II £o0Z/9z/61 0/6000'S IZ9SSSO#'IOOd VWNd .LI OSBg as8g -- asug JBd/sasBgg asBg - --- a;BQ papodag iIoF;dFiasaQ adAl sso'I/uFB=J ;am ;unomV ;soo aoF><d a;BQ ap;as uBiy a;BQ opsiy -- ----- ---------- zVKja :sn;B;$ EOOZ/T E/Z T - £ooz/T/Z T 0000100ODS30-agivarros oa-asoo asn :SouaiinO asug Alo2a4vC) uopousuuil Aq papodag 600aM3 :aI:podag IiB�aQ uoT;�BsiIE.Ty - o youagxaOM 8E £OOZ/9Z/ZT OOWId-ZI3dO £OOZ/i/ZI WH3'1'omol :ZOZZZSLo3S306'13IOOtbi£ :aI33S£0/i0/90 Qa 81OZ/10/90 00'0 L6'8IS L6'819 OLVEES Eooz/9Z/ZT 0/6000'9 6EL8890#100d VWNq .LI £OoZ/9Z/ZT 03WId-H3dO £OOZ/I/Zi WH3 'I.I.ONO 'ZOZZZSLOdS30LHdgoobi£ aI 33S£0/Io/£o Qa 81oz/Io/£0 00"0 66'ZtC'T 66'Zb£'i o£9'ZZ9'9 £ooz/9Z/6I %oOO'S 8TE9890#'IOOd VWMq 11 £OOZ/9Z/Z T 03 W Id-H3dO WH3.L JNO'I :ZOZZZSLO1gS3OZZM300bT£ EOOZ/T/Zi aI33s£o/To/zo as sioz/To/zo 00'0 OL'SSI OL'SSI OZI'STS £ooz/97,/Zi %000'S 9999890#100d VWN3 11 EOoz/9Z/Zi 03WId-H3dO £OOZ/T/ZT WH3.L ONOI :ZOZZZSLOAS3OLHO300bTE :(II33SE0/TO/£0 as 8IOZ/IO/£0 00'0 ZI'bL8 Z11748 OOb'68L'Z £OoZ/9Z/ZT %000'9 OOZS8900'IOOd VWN3 11 £ooz/9Z/Z I 03W Id-H3dO E00Z/i/ZT WH31 ONO'I �ZOZZZSLOAS3OTHE000bi£ :aI 33s£o/To/so as sioz/10/90 00'0 £E'£8b'T ££'£8b'T o8b'IL9'I £Ooz/9Z/ZT %000'9 20617290#100cl VWN3 .LI £OOZ/9Z/Z I 03WId-H3d0 £OOZ/T/ZI WH3.,`JNO'I •ZOZZZSLodS3OI.L17Ai6ETE :(II33SE0/IO/TO Qa 8TOZ/10/ZO 00'0 TE'LOE IE'LO£ 098'IEo'I £006/9Z/61 %000'9 b££I890#100d VWMq LI £o0Z/9Z/Zi 03WId-H3dO EOOZ/i/ZI WH3,L JNO1I :zozzzSL03S3ObS£Ai6£i£ QI33SE0/IO/ZO(la 81OZ/IO/ZO 00'0 S8'9£b'Z S8'9£b'Z 009'£6S'L £o0Z/97,/Zi %00o'S 60EI890#'I00d VWMq .LI £ooz/9Z/ZT 03WId-H3dO EOOZ/I/Zi WH3.L0N0'I :ZOZZZSL03S3OZH9di6£I£ al 33SZ0/To/T T as LTOZ/i0/80 00'0 LZ'bbo'I LZ'bbo'T o£9'9LT'£T £Ooz/9Z/ZT %000'9 08ZEL90#'I00d VWN3 11 EooZ/9Z/Z I 03W Id-H3dO £OOZ/I/ZT WH3.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOAS308aSa06£I£ QI33SZO/TO/LO as LIOZ/To/LO 00'0 99'8bS'Z 99'8bS'Z 04Z'69S'EZ £Ooz/9Z/Zi %000'9 91 iES90#100d VWNJ 1I £Ooz/9Z/ZT 03WId-H3dO £OOZ/T/Zi WH3.LONO'I :ZOZZZSL09S300Sbb68£I£ al 33SZ0/TO/Lo as LIOZ/10/LO 00'0 ZL'Eb£'tb ZL'£b£'b 090'OL9'61 £OoZ/9Z/ZT %000'9 9LEZE90#'IOOd VWMA LI OSBg OS1311 asBg =gd/saiBi[g as8g a;BQ papodag uoildpo aQ addy ssoZ/uiimj 40M junouxV 4503 001-1d a3gQ al;;as sissy a;BQ ap8iy ,rVKI3 _snjgas SOOZ/T H/Z T - £OOZ/T/Z T 0000I00ODS30-a9LVaZ70SATo0-aS3O aSII :Sauaun0 asBg Ajo2a:p,3 II01;38sue f, Aq papoda-H 60O MS :QI:podag p8:13a IIoF;08su8-,y t{ouagyroM 6£ £OoZ/9Z/Z i OOW Id-H3d0 £OOZ/i/Zi W'831ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOLWZH1Obi£ QI Om£0/i0/90 QQ 8TOZ/TO/90 00'0 S9'ILZ'T 99'ILZ'T 0££'LbS'Z £OOZ/9Z/ZT %000'S 8b160LO#100d VWNd LI £OOZ/9Z/ZT 03WId-S3d0 £OOZ/T/Zi W2IM.ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO£OUSIObT£ aI 03S£0/10/b0 Qa LIOZ/10/10 00'0 90'91b SO'91b Ob9'098 EOOZ/9061 %Oo0'9 961£OLO#100d VWNd LI EooZ/9Z/Zi 03WId-S3d0 EOOZ/i/Zi WN21L JNO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSOOZQHViObT£ QI OSS£0/TO/bo QQ 8TOZ/10/20 00'0 b0'Z£9 b0'Z£9 OZO'09O'Z EooZ/9Z/Zi %OOO'S 8Z£ZOLO#'IOOd VWNd ILI £OOZ/9Z/Z i 03WId-S3d0 £OOZ/T/Zi W2i31DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO06daVi0bTE aI Oms£o/Io/so as SIOZ/TO/so 00'0 88'S81'I 88'S8T'I OTS'££L'9 £OOZ/9Z/ZI 0/6000'S OIZZOLO#'I00d VWNd Ll £OoZ/9Z/Z T OOW Id-2I2d0 £OOZ/i/Zi WSSL JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOZ.1dA00bI£ :GI 32S£0/10/£0 QQ LIOZ/10/60 00'0 6I'Z9b 6VZ917 0II'6Lb £OoZ/9Z/ZT %000'9 6£68690#'I00d VWNd II £OOZ/9Z/ZT 03WId-HSd0 £OOZ/T/ZI Mal JNO'I•ZOZZZSLOdSOOZdllLOObi£ :al O'ZS£O/to/b0 as SIOZ/TO/so 00'0 b£'Si i b£'SI i 09L'069 £OOZ/9Z/ZT %000'S 9ZOL690#100d VWNd LI £OoZ/9Z/ZT 00WId-SZd0 £OOZ/T/ZT WS3'L ONO'I •ZOZZZSLodSOO£ZOSOObi£ QI OgS£0/IO/SO as 8TOZ/TO/so 00'0 OT'£bS'£ OT'£bS'£ 08Z'b99'6 £OoZ/9Z/ZT %OOO'S 6889690#'I00d VWNd LI £OOZ/9Z/Zi 03WId-S3d0 £OOZ/i/Zi WS31.JNOI :ZOZZZSLOdSO0OAHS00bI£ aI 02S£o/To/so as STOZ/10/so 00'0 ST'99I'1 S1'991'I OSO'££0's £OOZ/9Z/ZT %000'S Z989690#'I00d VWNd LI EOoZ/9Z/Z T OO W Id-X2d0 £OOZ/T/ZT WX2'L 0N0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO0i7LAd00bT£ :GI Oss£o/To/£o as STOZ/To/Eo 00'0 SZ'SLI'E 8Z'SLi'£ OLL179b'OI EOOZ/9Z/ZT 0/o000'S b£8£6909100d VWNd ,LI £OoZ/9Z/Li 00WId-S2d0 £OOZ/T/ZT WE211 JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO080W)I00bi£ aI ogsso TO/SO as STOZ/TO/SO 00'0 £T'9LS £I'9LS 0£T'Z68'Oi £o0Z/9Z/ZT %000'9 6S86890#'I00d VWNd ILI aqua asBg aqua sud/sassgs aqua a4va papodag uoTldposa(l adAl ssol/ulvo 4ax ;unomv ;soc) aoTJd 03gQ OP409 uVI.L 94uQ apus,y £ooZ/T£/ZT - £ooZ/T/ZT ------ -- ------OOOOTOOODS30-afflvarrosmoa-asoo asn :SouaunO asug Aio2a:jie3 uopowswex L Aq papodag 6009Mg :aI asodag oB;aQ IIOi�ouSIIE.iy a Wuag3jjoAj Qt7 £OOZ/9Z/Z i OOWId-Usclo £OOZ/T/ZT W1131 ONO'I �ZOZZZSLOMOVAIAXIObT£ :(IIOSSEo/To/90 QQ 8TOZ/TO/LO 00'0 86'6ZE'T 86'6ZE'T OTS'tos;,c £006/9Z/ZI 0/6000'9 6Z91ZLO#100d VWNd 11 EoOZ/9Z/Z i 00WId-Had0 £OOZ/i/Zi WH31ONO1 :ZOZZZSL03S000NI'MTOblE aIOSSEO/TO/9O as 810Z/10/90 00'0 00'£9£'01 00'£9£'0T 06E'ESS'Lb £OOZ/9Z/Zl 0/6000'9 69£OZLO#100d VWNd ,LI £OOZ/9Z/Zl OOWId-HSdO EOOZ/T/ZT W 9'LONO'I •ZOZZZSLOASOOSbOMTObT£ (1[ms£o/lo/Lo as 81OZ/10/Lo 00'0 99'9911, 99'99l'b 091'ZE8'L £o0Z/9Z/ZT 0/6000'S 6l£0ZL0#'IOOd VWNd ,LI £ooZ/9Z/ZT OOWId-21gdO £00Z/I/ZT WXS1 ONO'I•ZOZZZSLO.dSOOTSONTOVI£ QIOSS£0/IO/LO au STOZ/TO/LO 00'0 9Z'LZb'T 9Z'LZb'T OL6'EZS'S £o0Z/9Z/6I 0/0000'5; 99££IL0#10Od VWNd .LI £ooZ/9Z/ZT O0WId-2I3d0 £OOZ/T/Zi WSS.LONO'I �ZOZZZSLOASOOMMIobT£ :QI OSS£0/10/90 QQ 8I06/10/90 00'0 6£'011 6E'011 0£L'E69 £OOZ/9Z/ZI 0/6000'9 tbt1££lL0#1OOd VWNA 1I £OOZ/9Z/Z T OOWId-NSdO £OOZ/i/Zi wasi3ONO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSO080H}ITObI£ QI OSS£0/10/90 QQ 810Z/10/90 00'0 8£'Olb'£ 8£'OTb'E Ob£'ITvll £OoZ/9Z/Zl %000'9 S£ZOILO#700d VWN3 ILI EOoZ/9Z/Z l OOWId-NgdO EUOZ/l/Zl MaiONO'I :ZOZZZSL0dS000Aw10t T£ (H 03S£0/10/90 QQ 8IOZ/10/90 00'0 179'£11 b9'ET1 006'8T1 EOOZ/9Z/ZI 0/6000'S £9660LO#'IOOd VWNd ,LI £OoZ/9Z/6 1 OOWId-ZISdO EOOZ/[/ZI W2J31ONO'I :ZOZZ.ZSL03SOOt ArlObi£ UI 03SEO/10/90 QQ STOZ/10/90 00'0 £b'8TI'I £b'81I'I OLS'b6L'Z £OoZ/9Z/Zl 0/6000'9 LI660Lo#'I00d VWNd 1I £OOZ/9Z/Z l O0WId-2I21dO £00Z/i/Zi WH3.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOd fSOObdS lOt l£ 41 OSSEO/10/90 QQ 810Z/10/90 00'0 bl'019 bI'0I9 OOL'SOo'T £o0Z/9Z/ZI %000'9 9Z860LO#'IOOd VWNA ILI £ooZ/9Z/Z T OOW Id-2IgdO £00Z/T/Zi WZiS'LONO'I:ZOZZZSLo3 T SO099E[ ObT£ -QI OSSEO/To/90 QQ 8TOZ/10/LO 00'0 6b'tZ6'Z 6b'tZ6'Z ObZ'916'Z £OOZ/9Z/ZT 0/6000'9 09E6OLO#'IOOd VWNA LI asus asua asBg sud/saiug8 aqua a;uQ papodag uoF;disosaQ adq ssorilula lam ;unomV ;803 solid 0:1uQ en:198 uu=y a;uQ apu�y zvx13 '�uels com/n/ell - EOoZ/T/ZT 00001000Os30-affsdartosnToa-asoo asn :Aauaisnp ages AjoNa;s3 uopossuvi L Aq papodag 6009ma :ai uodQH 111naa u0possuBiy youagXpoM I b £OOZ/9Z/Z i OO WId-H3dO £OOZ/i/ZT WS211,ONO'I 'ZOZZZSL03SOObZ£H£OVI£ QIO2SEO/TO/60 QQ 81OZ/10/60 00'0 bb'9£L bb'9£L OLST06 E00Z/9Z/ZI %000'9 91£I7bLO#100d VWNd ILI £OOZ/9Z/Z T OO W Id-2I2dO £OOZ/i/ZT wasi3ONO'I �ZOZZZSLOdSOOKNElcObT£ QI 03S£0/TO/60 QQ STOZ/TO/LO 00'0 SZ1,96'b 8Z'bS6'b OTS'b8£'S £OOZ/9Z/ZT %000'9 SOOVtLO#'IOOd VWNd 1I £006/9Z/L I OOWId-HSdO EOOZ/T/ZI W231ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOLHSMZObT£ QIOzS£0/TO/II QQ STOZ/TO/OT 00'0 68'9Lb'£ 68'9Lb'£ OZ£'T8S'£ £OOZ/9Z/ZT %000'9 SbLObLO#'IOOd VWNd ILI £OOZ/9Z/Z T 00WId-ZISdO £OOZ/i/ZT WZ1211ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOooi71mZObI£ (IIOSSEO/IO/0I Q4 SIOZ1i0/01 00'0 96'Z6Z'E 96'Z6Z'E Ob9'Sb8'68 £00Z/9Z/ZI %000'S iLtbObLO#'IOOd VWNd LI £OOZ/9Z/ZT 00WId-HZdO £OOZ/I/ZI W83.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOZONnzot?i£ QI OM£0/10/01 QQ 8TOZ/10/0I 00'0 b£'OS6 b£'096 OZ£'6ZL'Z £OOZ/9Z/ZI %OOO'S L8b8£LO1t100d VWNd LI £OOZ/9Z/Z T OOW Id-HgdO £OOZ/T/Zi WZIZ.L`JNOI :ZOZZZSLOdSOozb(InZObT£ GI 02S£O/10/01 QQ 81OZ/10/01 00'O SZ'08b'Z SZ'OSt'Z OZ£'88b'Z £OOZ/9Z/Zi 0/6000'S IIZ8£LO#100d VWNd ILI EOOZ/9Z/Z I OOWId-S'adO £OOZ/T/ZT WH2,L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO06dbSZObT£ QI 02S£0/TO/OT OQ SIOZ/TO/OT 00'0 99'bbT'E 99'ttI'£ OEZ'OLZ'E £OOZ/9Z/6I %OOO'S 0£TLELO#100d VWNd LI £OOZ/9Z/Z I OOWId-ZI3dO £00Z/I/ZI WH21LONO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSOOSNdWZObi£ QIO3S£0/TO/0T QQ STOZ/TO/TT 00'0 00'ESi 00'ESI 06T'8£T £OOZ/9Z/Zi %OOO'S EL8Z£LO#'IOOd VWNd ILI £OOZ/9Z/ZT OOWId-H3dO £OOZ/T/ZT WNSILONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO£MZIHZOtbT£ GI OSS£0/10/LO QQ 8TOZ/10/LO 00'0 £6'6ZS'T £6'6Z8'T OOtb'OS£'8 £OOZ/9Z/Zi 0/6000'9 1096ZL0#'I00d VWNd ILI EOOZ/9L/Z T OOWId-SSdO £OOZ/I/Zi MIS1ON01I :ZOZZZSLOdS00tbaXVZObI£ QIOaS£0/TO/90 QQ 8TOZ/10/90 00'0 Z0'690'1 ZO'690'1 0811,96 £OOZ/9Z/ZI %000'9 L8b£ZLO#100d VWNd ,LI asBg assg Sud/samn[S asBg ---- o4va papodag --- -- — uopd1josaa adAj sso'I/UTUf) lam ;unoiuV ;sod aaF=d a4va aid;as UW L a;Ba opuzi ,jVIu3 =41ei$ 0000100oos3o-uzxvarroSmoa-aS3o asn :Aouaunn assg 1zo2olu7 uopoTesuvil Aq papodag eoosm3 aioda2i Ii8;aa IIoi;oLsuBly e �uagx.�oM Zt £OOZ/9Z/ZT OOWId-H:Rd0 £OOZ/i/ZT WSSION01 :ZOZZZSL03S0082mot'T£ aI Osseo/INII as 8TOZ/To/II 00'0 bZ'99I'b 17Z'99I'b Obb'bL£'b EOOZ/9Z/ZT %000'9 ZL£99LO#100d VWNA ILI EOOZ/9Z/ZT 00WId-Had0 £OOZ/T/Zi W1131 ONOI�ZOZZZSLOSSOOEV9a£ObT£ aIOaS80/T0/TI as 8IOZ/TO/ZT 00'0 OT'b9L'Z Oi'b9L'Z 00tb'6Sb'6 EOOZ/9Z/ZT %000'9 99I99LO#100d VWNd 11 EOOZ/9Z/ZT 00WId-2Isd0 EOOZ/T/ZT WNS.LON01 �ZOZZZSLOdSOO£Zt/N£ObT£ aI03SE0/10/IT aaSTOZ/T0/TI 00'0 SZ'99i'b SZ'99T'b ObS'LZS'b £OOZ/9Z/ZI 0/6000'9 SZb£SLO#100d VWNd ,LI £OOZ/9Z/Z I 03WId-2Isd0 EOOZ/i/Zi WSSJ,JN01 :ZOZZZSLOdSOOTHWIEObi£ QIOSS£0/TO/TI as 810Z/TO/ZI 00'0 LZ'EZ8'E LZ'EZ8'E OLI'68VC E006/9Z/ZI 0/6000'S 09619LO#IOOd VWNd ILI EOOZ/9Z/Z i 00WId-SZd0 £OOZ/I/ZT WH2,L ONOl :ZOZZMOASOOZZMfEObTE :uI Osseo/IO/II auSTOZ/IO/TT 00'0 9S'ZT8 9E'ZI8 089'ST8 £OOZ/9Z/Li 0/0000'S SbbOSLO#IOOd VWNd 11 SOOZ/9Z/Z T 00WId-2isd0 £OOZ/T/ZT WSS.L DN01 :ZOZZZSLOdSO09aflf£ObT£ QI OSS£0/10/1 T as 8TOZ/10/1 i 00'0 68'Eb6'8 69T176'8 OEO'SOE'S EOOZ/9Z/ZT %000'5; 08£0S40#IOOd VWNd 1I £OOZ/9Z/L T 00WId-2ISd0 £OOZ/i/ZI WHS'LO I NO :ZOZZZSLOdSO0ZVnfE0i7TE aI OSSEO/TO/TI as BTOZ/TO/II 00'0 Eb'Z£L'OI Eb'ZEL'OT OEE'LIE'SZ £OOZ/9Z/Zi %000'9 LLEOSLO#IOOd VWNd 11 SOOZ/9Z/Z T OOW Id-sad0 £OOZ/T/ZI WNS.L 1 JN0 •ZOZZZSLo9s0001LJEObTE :GI OsS£0/10/I I as 8I0Z/IO/ZT 00'0 Z9'Etb£'b Z9'£b£'b 09b'98L'Z EOOZ/9Z/ZT 0/6000'9 6688bL0#IOOd VWNd .LI £OOZ/6Z/ZT 00WId-2Isd0 EOOZ/I/ZI WHSJ,JNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOMINJEOM£ aI OSSEO/10/60 as STOZ/10/80 00'0 IO'ZZO`I IO'ZZO'1 099'I96 £OOZ/66/ZT 0/0000'9 OOb8bL0#IOOd VWN3 1I £OOZ/9Z/ZI OOWId-s3d0 £OOZ/T/Zi WXMLON01•ZOZZZSLOdS000XEdE0bIE aIOaSEO/IO/TI as STOZ/IO/TI 00'0 80'615;'i 80'61S'i OZL'bS9'I £OOZ/9Z/ZI 0/6000'S b16LbLO#100d VWNd .LI assg asBg anus Iva/saisgg asBg a;8a pa:podag uoF;dTzosaa adAl ssoZ/uTBJ laid 3un0u1v 4803 aa�sd OWC1 014409 UW L a;ea apssy lrvxId :sn41349 EooZ/T£/m - £ooZ/i/m 000010000930-CIZZY OSM0o-asao asn :6auauno asBg Azoftpo uopossusx y Aq papodag 600am3 :al uodaX HUMI u01;013suvi L yma4xaon1 E b £OOZ/SI/ZT OOWId-HSdO £OOZ/i/ZT WHS.L ON01 :ZOZZZS403S006Mld4OZ9£ QI OSS86/10/90 QQ 8ZOZ/91/SO 00'0 ZT'Lbi ZI'LbT OOZ'Ib £OOZ/ST/ZT 0/6000'9 4908Eb0#100d VWNJ LI £OOZ/S I/Z T OO WId-HSdO £OOZ/T/Zi WHS1OMO1:ZOZZZSL0dSO0£ZOn90Z9£ QI OSS96/1040 QQ 9WOZ/9140 00'0 94'£8 94'£8 0£4'bZS £OOZ/ST/Z.T %009'9 68£IZbO#100d VWMO LI £00Z/91/Zi OOWId-HSdO £OOZ/i/Zi WHS,L JNO1 :ZOZZZSLOdSOOSbSWI0Z9£ QI OSSZO/I0/ZT QQ Z£OZ/SI/Ti 00'0 L£'IL£ L£'TLS 086'61b'£ £OOZ/ST/ZT 0/bOOS'9 6£-V4890#100d VWMD ,LI E00Z/S T/Z T OOWId-HSdO EOOZ/T/ZT Waal ONO1:ZOZZZSL0ds3OzzDwI0Z9£ QI OSSZO/10/90 QQ Z£OZ/S1/90 00'0 ZS'SZT ZS'SZT 089'819'1 £OOZ/Si/ZT %009'9 4TI4890#100d VWMO JI EOOZ/S I/Z I OOW Id-HSdO £OOZ/i/Z I Mal ONO1-ZOZZZSLOdS309GIMO 9£ :QIOSSTO/IO/II QQ I£OL/SI/IT 00'0 OZ'6Z£ OZ'6ZE OO£'E6S'T EOOL/SI/ZI %009'9 b9£S490#100d VWNO ,LI £OOZ/S I/Z T OOWId-HSdO £OOZ/i/ZT WHSI JNO1 :ZOZZZ9LOdS3OLxV1A00Z9£ QI OSSIO/IO/ZT QQ TEOZ/Si/ZT 00'0 Lb'8SZ'E Lb'8SZ'£ 069'£L8'Zb EOOZ/SI/ZT 0/0009'9 ME3,490#100d VWMIJ 11 £OOZ/S T/Z T OOWId-HSdO £OOZ/T/ZT W2IS.L JM01:ZOZZZSLOdSO08bJH00Z9£ QI OSSZO/TO/LO QQ Z£OZ/ST/LO 00'0 66'019 66'01S 088'£98'£ £OOZ/ST/ZT %009'9 610OLSON100d VWMO ILI EOOZ/S I/Z T OOWId-HSdO £OOZ/T/ZT WHS.L JN01:ZOZZZSL03SOOZSZUOOZ9E QIOSSZO/TO/ZO QQ Z£OZ/ST/ZO 00'0 19'90£ 19'90£ OZ£'SZb'£ £OOZ/ST/Zi %OOS'9 9896990#100d VWN'D 11 £OOZ/SI/ZT OOWId-ZISdO £OOZ/i/ZT Waal DN01 •ZOZZZSL0dSO0£3Iaa00Z9£ :(II DSSZO/I0/to as ZEOZ/ST/J70 00'0 16'910'4 I6'9I0'L OZ6'I££'SL £OOZ/ST/ZI %OOS'9 89£6990#100d VWMD 11 £OOZ/SI/LT OOWId-HSdO £OOZ/T/Zi WHSION01 :ZOZZZ9L03S3ObHAsooz9E QIOSSZO/TO/60(Ia ZEOZ/91/60 00'0 LS't,80'Z LS'b80'Z 088'L98'Lb £OOZ/ST/ZI 0/6009'9 ZI996SO#100d vwmo 11 asug aqua asug Tad/sQjmgs --- asug a4va papodag uoF;djzosaQ ad.1 ssoZ/UTvO ;ax ;unoTUv 4800 aa�Td a;BQ aj;;as UN.T L a;sQ apsTZ 1°'Ni3 'snaps £OOZ/T£/ZT - £OOZ/T/ZT 0000T0000soo-assMrosn[oo-asao asn :AanaunC)ases Ajo2a4sa uoT4oi3su8jy Aq papodag 600sm :cu podaa Pmea uononsuB-t,y tpuagxlo,H bf� OOTATId-Zl3dO £OOZ/i/Zi D�3SZ ONO'I •ZOZZZ9L08S000aHQ6OZ9£ QI0SS86/TO/80 QQ 8ZOZ/91/80 00'0 00'610`Z 00'610`Z Ot6'T16'Z8 EOOZ/ST/ZT %OOO'9 6E£89tO#100d VWNO LI EOOZ/S i/Z i OOWId-2I3dO E00Z/i/Zi MIS,L ONOq •ZOZZZSLO.dS00tAHQ6OZ9E QI03S86/IO/SO QQ 8ZOZ/SI/90 00'0 tS't6 tS't6 066'SE EOOZ/ST/Zi 0/6000'9 0£E89t0#100d VWNO 11 EOOZ/ST/ZT 00NIId-HSdO EOOZ/I/Zi WSS.L ONO I :ZOZZZ9L03SOOt7WS06OZ9£ QI0SSS6/TO/LO QQ 8ZOZ/ST/LO 00'0 ZO'9lt'1 ZO'9Tt'T OLS'887 EOOZ/ST/ZT %OOS'9 69089tO#'IOOd VWNO LI EOOZ/ST/Zl ODWId-ZISdO EOOZ/I/ZI WHS.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOAS00ZX006OZ9£ QI OSS86/10/01 QQ 8ZOZ/ST/0I 00'0 ZT'E66'I ZI'E66'T OLE'TSS EOOZ/ST/Zl 0/6000'9 98ZL9tO#'I00d VWNO LI EOOZ/ST/Zl OD IId-d2dO EOOZ/i/ZI wSS'LONO'I :ZOZZZSL03S00LaO06OZ9£ :QI0SS86/10/OT QQ 8ZOZ/91/01 00'0 Ot'ti T Ot'tT T 06V6E EOOZ/Si/ZT %000'9 6LZL9t0#100d VWNO J,I £OOZ/S I/Z T 00NIId-d2dO EOOZ/i/ZI NS31ONO'I :ZOZZZSLO4S009V.LH6OZ9E QI 0SS86/10/90 QQ 8ZOZ/ST/90 00'0 OZ'SOt OZ'SOt OS8'6Et'L EOOZ/Sl/Zi 0/0009'9 St899tO#'IOOd VwNO if EOOZ/S I/Z l oDwlcl-s2d0 EOOZ/[/Z[ WN31 ONO l :ZOZZZSL03S008tSH6OZ9£ CII 03S86/10/60 QQ 8ZOZ/ST/60 00'0 SO'E6S'Z SO'£69'Z OLT'IIZ'tZ COWS I/ZI °,A00'9 SS999t0#'I00d VWNO ILI EOOZ/S l/Z I O3WId-N2IdO EOOZ/l/Z I wadi JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO£.L3V6OZ9E Cll 03SS6/l0/80 QQ 8ZOZ/91/80 00'0 68'00t'Z 68'OOt'Z 081'Z£T'TZ EOOZ/SI/Zl 0/6000'9 9bS99t0#'I00d VWNO .LI EOOZ/S I/Z I 00161ld-2I3d0 COW I/Zi V 821 ONO'I �ZOZZZSLOAS00EHSa80M QI0SS86/TO/OI QQ 8ZOZ/ST/01 00'0 S0'861 90'861 OSL'69Z'T £OOZ/Si/ZT 0/6000'9 tT8LStO#'IOOd VWNO 'LI £OOZ/ST/Zi ODWId-2I2dO £OOZ/i/ZI NRI3,L ON01 :ZOZZZSLOAS000'L4%d80Z9E QI 02SS6/10/10 QQ SZOZ/ST/TO 00'0 6t'S£T 6t'SEi OTI'Ot £OOZ/ST/ZT %OOS'9 I S86ttO#'IOOd VWNO if assg asBg asug jud/saisgg - asBg — -- apia papodag uopdpasaa adjL ssoZ/uTsa ;aK ;unoulr 4803 aaF=d a;BQ apiaS sissy 7vm3 'sn;lns EOOZ/I£/Z T - £OOZ/i/ZI OOOOTOOGOSOo-a9zvar7osNo3-asljo QSn :Aouaun0 assg Ajo2a4BO uopmesur it Aq papodag 600gma :QI3iodag pule a uoT;o8sunli ipua93j1OM S , £OOZ/Si/Zi 00wid-ZIsdO EOOZ/i/ZI ➢VZINZONO'I :ZOZZZSLodS009WAVOIZ9£ QI0QS86/IO/ZI QQ SZOZ/SI/ZI 00'0 99'19 99'I9 OLCEZ E00Z/SI/ZI 0/6000'9 OZL98b0#100d VWNO 11 com/sl/n OONIId-NSdO £00Z/i/Zi WZINZ`JNO'I :ZOZZZSL03S009ANA6OZ9E QI03S to/To/so QQ i£OZ/Si/SO 00'0 ZS'b19 ZS'b19 OL6'9LS'ZI £OOZ/SI/Zi %009'9 EOLS8t70#'I00d VWNO ,LI com/sl/n 03WId-ZINdO EOOZ/i/ZI Was.L`JNO'I :ZOZZZSL0.3SO099HA6OZ9£ QI 0SS To/10/80 QQ IEOZ/SI/80 00-0 LZ'909 LZ'909 00b'SLZ'9 £OOZ/Si/Zi %OOS'9 7,89S8b0#'I00d VWMO ,LI £OOZ/Si/Zi 00wid-ZINdo £OOZ/i/Zi YVZ21ONO'I :ZOZZZSLO,dS008£NA6OZ9E QI 02STO/10/LO QQ i£OZ/Si/LO 00'0 Stb'ZZ6'Z Sb'ZZ6'Z OLI'SOi'OZ £OOZ/Si/ZI 0/0009'9 01998VO#'I00d VNiNO J.I EOOZ/Si/m 00WId-H9do EOOZ/i/Zi WX9J,ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOAS00IMA60M :Qi DES I0/IO/90 QQ IEOZ/91/90 00'0 E8'Lfi9'Z £8'Lb9'Z 06L'E9L'8Z £OOZ/ST/ZT %009'9 LZSS8b0#'I00d VWNO Li £OOZ/SI/ZI 00WId-ZI3dO £OOZ/i/Zi Y�IZI9.L ON0'I :ZOZZZSLOdS00EAaM6OZ9E QI 03S86/10/60 QQ SZOZ/Si/60 00'0 SO'99 90'99 OZ9'61 EOOZ/Si/Zi %000'9 ZSbE8b0#'100d VWNO LI EOOZ/SI/Zi ODWId-NQdO £OOZ/I/ZI M31 ON01 -ZOZZZSL03SO093ES6OZ9£ 4I0QS86/10/01 QQ 8ZOZ/9I/01 00'0 Lb'i91'1 LV19i'i 06S'Oii'Sb EOOZ/Si/Zi %OOS'9 86908b0#100d VWNO LI EOOZ/S i/Z i 00WId-M:RdO £OOZ/I/Zi W11Qs ONO'I -ZOZZZSLOgSO06.LAa6OZ9E :GI 03S66/10/10 QQ 6ZOZ/SI/I0 00-0 6SOL6 69'OL6 06L'SO6'bi £OOZ/Si/Zi %OOS'9 9Z984t70#'IOOd VWNO LI £OOZ/Si/Zi ODWId-ZIQdO £OOZ/i/ZI WNS.L ONO I :ZOZZZSLO.�S00L2ZW6OZ9E QI 03S86/10/90 QQ SZOZ/91/90 00'0 9L'91 Z'I 9L'91 Z'I 08E-E9L'I I E00Z/Si/Z I 0/6009'9 I b09Lb0#'IOOd VWNO ILI EOOZ/Si/Zi ODWId-H2IdO EOOZ/i/Zi ➢ X3J.JNO'I :ZOZZZSL03S008NX2I6OZ9£ QI0QS86/10/ii QQSZOZ/SI/II 00'0 ZE78 Z£'Z8 OEI'L6 EOOZ/SI/Zi %000'9 88969b0#'IOOd VWMO LI assg awgj assg jiad/sam3gg asBg ap3a pa:podag uoF;djiosaa adds, ssoZ/uTuq ;aH ;unowV ;sod aaFsd 0418Q ai;;as UvJ L a4va opw L [ 1VIM :sn;gls £OOZ/T£/Z i - EOOZ/T/m 0000100ODS30-(MUM r0SH0a-Qs�o Qsn :AouassnO aseg dlo2a4E3 uopaiesulim L Aq papodag 600g/!s3 :QI;sodag Pie:10Q uoytassuviy 7Puagx-IoAI 9t, £OOZ/ST/ZT OOWId-SSdO £OOZ/T/Zi WSHIONO'I :ZOZZZSL0dSOO£SZ0ZTZ9£ QI0SSTO/i040 QQ T£OZ/Si/b0 00'0 SV96Z 8b'96Z OLT'£60'£ £QQZ/ST/ZT 0/6OO9'9 ESOOESO# IOOd dWN`J Jd £OOZ/ST/Zi O0Wid-2ISdO £OOZ/i/ZI WNSI JNO'I �ZOZZZSLO.dS0OZ3'II`TTZ98 QI 0SS66/TO/LO Qa 6Z0Z/ST/LO 00'0 8£'696 8£'696 09b'Z6i'TI £OOZ/ST/Zi %OOS'9 9Z£bTS0#'I00d HWNJ .LI £OOZ/ST/Zi OOWId-MadO EOOZ/T/Zi WN&LONO'I �ZOZZZSLOASOO9O8Ji1Z9£ GI0SS66/TO/TT QQ 6ZOZ/91/TT 00'0 1£'69 1£'6S 081'9I £QOZ/SI/ZT %OOS'9 S£ZZTSO#'IOOd dWND 11 EOOZ/SI/ZI OOWId-SSdO EOOZ/T/ZT WZISI ONOI ;ZOZZZSLO.dS0006AA0TZ9£ QI 02IS66/1O40 QQ 6ZOZ/9I/ib0 00'0 09'L8I 09'L81 OO1'Z6L £OOZ/ST/ZI %000'9 9£99090#1I00d HWX0 .LI £OOZ/S T/Z T OOWId-ZISdO £OOZ/T/ZT WSS,L JNO'I:ZOZZZSLOdS0OSSdA0TZ9£ :QI 02S66/TO/£0 QQ 6ZOZ/91/EO 00'0 £L'TOL'T £L'TOL'T Qib'£8L'ZZ £OOZ/SI/Zi 0/6000'9 88££090#100d HWN`J .LI £OOZ/S T/Z I OOWId-ZISdO EOOZ/T/ZT WS21 JNO'I:ZOZZZSLOeIS000ddSOTZ9£ QI 02S66/1040 Qa 6ZOZ/SI/tO 00'0 L6'£b L6'£V 098'L9b'I £OOZ/ST/Zi %000'9 L16005;0#'I00d VWNO ,LI £QOZ/ST/ZT OOWId-USdO £OOZ/T/Zi WH21 JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS3OS3aa0TZ9£ QI 0SS66/TO/ZO QQ 6Z0Z/ST/ZO 00'0 bb'£9 bt,'£9 069'Li £OOZ/ST/ZT %000'9 £ST66b09'I00d dWNO ,LI £OOZ/ST/ZT O0WId-2I2[dO £OOZ/T/ZT WS31 JNO'I :ZOZZZSL03SO0SbdN0TZ9£ QI0SS86/TO/ZT QQ 8ZOZ/ST/Zi 00'0 SUM SULZT 090'ZLO'Z £OOZ/ST/ZT %000'9 £b£L00#100d HWN`J ,LI £OOZ/ST/ZT OOWId-S2dO £OOZ/T/ZT WSSIONO'I:ZOZZZSL0,3SOOtm0wolZ9E QI OSS66/10/10 QQ 6ZOZ/91/10 00'0 96'19Z'Z 96'19Z'Z OOZ'bSS'II £OOZ/ST/ZT 0/6000'9 191796tO#'00d VWNJ ILI £OOZ/ST/ZT OOWId-HZdO £QOZ/T/ZI M21 JNO'I:ZOZZZSL09SooVAzldoTME QI0SS66/10/10 QQ 6ZOZ/91/10 00'0 16199 16'199 088'b£S'b £OOZ/ST/Zi 0/6000'9 £OTT6tO#'IOOd dWND ,LI eggs aqua aqua =gd/saaBgg as-as alga pa}Tod*U uopdposoa adAl sso'I/Upo lam lunoutV lsoo aa�sd alga oplas ugly alga opvj L ,°'HI3 7$°4g4s EOOZ/T E/Z T - EOOZ/T/ZT 000010000800-Q7zval7osxo"S:)o asn :Aouarmo asBg dao2wpo uotpousuuiy Aq popodoH 60ogAAR :ai:podou 111340a UOTIOUsu78iy Wua"-IOAI L� £ooz/zz/Z T 00W Id-MSdO EOOZ/I/Zi WMalomo'I :ZOZUSLOZIS000Z00SZz9E GI 03SL6/10/90 QQ LZOZ/OZ/90 00'0 Sn'sr"T SZ,tsz'T OL9'SE8'£i Eooz/ZZ/Zi %SL£'L W880080#'IOOd II VWNJ ILI Eooz/Zz/zl 00WId-M3d0 Eooz/T/ZI Mal JNO'1 :ZOZZZSL0.3S006ZV0SZZ9E QI03S96/TO/Zi 4Q 00'0 TS'SI I'T TS'SiT'T OSO'£z£`8 £OOZ/ZZ/ZT 9ZOZ/06/Z1 ,LM MVA EZOO8o0#'I00d II VWNO ,LI Eooz/Si/zi 00WId-M3d0 Eooz/i/Zi MalJNO'I:ZOZZZSL03SO06ZJa£IZ9£ QI03STO/TO/LO QQ 1£OZ/ST/LO 00'0 bT'blS'z tll'bTS'z OZ6'E9i'9 Eooz/Sl/ZT %OOS'9 LT01990#'I00d VWNO ILI £OOZ/Si/Zi 00WId-M3d0 EOOZ/1/Zi Mal ONO'I •ZOZZZSLOAS009f1S3EIME QI 03SZo/10/LO QQ ZEOZ/St/LO 00'0 68'O8S'Z 68'089'Z Oi£'8EE'61 Eooz/ST/ZT %OOS'9 699ZSS0#'I00d VWNO .LI £ooz/ST/z I 00WId-MSdO Eooz/i/ZT Mal JNO'I'ZOzzzSLo3S309EM3£Tz9£ :(IIoSSzo/To/cocczcoz/S;T/co 00'0 9L'TOb'£ 9L'IOb'E OZS'£88'z£ Eooz/ST/zl 0/0009'9 99bZSS0#'IOOd vwmD 11 £ooz/S I/Z 1 00WId-MSdO EOOZ/i/zt WMS'LOMO'I'ZOZZZSLo3S3ocxS3£Iz9E QI 03SZo/10/10 QQ zEOz/SI/To 00'0 98'Lbb 98'Lbb 0£o"896'tb £ooz/SI/Zi %OOS'9 ZZEZSSO#'IOOd VWN'J 11 £ooz/S 1/z I 00WId-M3d0 Eooz/1/zl WMalONO'l UZZZSLO.�S00Z8NAMM U103SIO/IO/zo QQ i£oz/Si/ZO 00'0 90'969 90'969 066'b9T Eooz./Sl/ZI 0,WOS'9 91LL1790#100d VWNO ILI Eooz/S 1/z l 00WId-M3dO E00Z/I/z[ WM3.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLO.�S006AJAZIZ9£ QI03SIO/10/to au I£oz/ST/b0 00'0 ZS'ZL ZS'ZL OLS'6T Eooz/SI/zi "/nOOS'9 Z1SLbS0#'IOOd VWMO ,LI Eooz/SI/zl 00WId-M3dO Eooz/I/Zi WM3.LON0'I :ZOZZZSLodsool3MWZME Q103STO/l0/ZO QQ T£Oz/ST/ZO 00'0 z9'Sb9 Z9'9b9 Obb'6bl'bi Eooz/ST/ZT %009'9 S88L£So#'I00d VWND ILI Eooz/9l/zi 00WId-M3dO EOOZ/i/zi WM31ONOl :ZOZZZSLOdsooIcouz1ME QI 03STO/To/to QQ iEOZ/91/£o 00'0 L6'ELE L6'£L£ OLE'Tb0'69 Eooz/9l/ZT 0/cOO9'9 06ZOE90#'100d VWNJ ILI asug asug aqua isd/saiugS aqua -- -— aima pwpodag uoytdposaQ adAl 8901/up o ;ag ;unou:V ;soo aal d a;u(l ap;aS uusy a;ua apusy ,IVHIj :snjvjS EOOZ/T E/Z T - EOOZ/T/Z T 0000T 0000soo-assvartosxoo-asoo asn :douauno asug Axo2o;sC) uopousuvj jL Aq pwpodag 60osMS :CU uadax n1u;aQ uopouswety Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 12/1/2003 - 12/31/2003 status: FINAL, Trade Date w Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT GNMA II POOL#0080395 VAR RT 12/22/2003 8,050.550 831.18 831.18 0.00 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/OOSECID: 12/1/2003 36225CNM40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/22/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA II POOL#080408X 6.500% 12/22/2003 88,698.190 7,483.56 7,483.56 0.00 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/OOSECID: 12/1/2003 36225CN280CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12/22/2003 IT GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN#TR 00545 VAR RT 12/22/2003 1,000,000.000 1,102.22 1,102.22 0.00 05/20/2004 DD 05/20/02SECID: 12/20/2003 36962GYS70CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/22/2003 PIMCO IT GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH VAR RT 12/16/2003 27,047.830 1,016.13 1,016.13 0.00 02/16/2030SECID: 12/16/2003 3837H4NX90CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12/16/2003 IT MARSH&MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 12/15/2003 2,000,000,000 66,250.00 66,250.00 0.00 6.625%06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99SEC ID: 12/15/2003 571748AB80CSF07522202: LONG TERM 12/15/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT NCNB TEX NATL BK DALLAS TEX NT 9.500% 12/1/2003 250,000.000 11,875.00 11,875.00 0.00 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/89SECID: 12/1/2003 628857DJOOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/1/2003 PIMCO IT PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC NTS 6.450% 12/1/2003 500,000,000 16,125.00 16,125.00 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 12/01/98SECID: 12/1/2003 695629CE30CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 12/1/2003 PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR 22,434,988.270 825,609.58 825,609.58 0.00 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: 22,434,988.270 825,609.58 825,609.58 0.00 TOTAL INTEREST BASE: 26,234,988.270 840,108.39 840,108.39 0.00 TOTAL TRANSACTIONS: 68,460,225.790 83,980,225.17 227,744.98 -88,534.60 48 Workbench BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Toad Ot/28/0428/04. AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 15 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Simon Watson, Maintenance Manager SUBJECT: Emergency Repair of the Plant 2 Truck Loading Station Auger System GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for Purchase Order No. 41835-OS issued to Dynamic Fabrication Inc. for $121 ,568.94, including tax and freight, and a contingency of $3,341.06 for any unforeseen work that may be required to complete the repair, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000.00, for the Emergency Repair of the Plant 2 Truck Loading Station Auger System. SUMMARY Background/Discussion • The existing biosolids truckloading station auger and auger troughs can no longer be maintained or repaired and must be replaced as soon as possible to maintain the system. The system is a critical component in loading 20 biosolids hauling trucks per day. • The existing truck loading facility was scheduled to be decommissioned July 2002 when the new facility (project P2-60) was scheduled for completion. The new facility, now 1 .5 years behind schedule, is in the hands of the bonding company and will not be put in service until July 2004. • Preventive and corrective maintenance is being performed on the existing system but the augers and auger troughs can no longer sufficiently be maintained to provide reliable operation until July 2004. Temporary repairs can no longer be made as the metal on the auger troughs is too thin to weld and repair. • The facility can only be shut down for 3 days (which will result in Plant 2 reaching maximum capacity of available solids storage). Therefore, it is necessary to have a complete new auger system manufactured as it would take longer than 3 days to remove and repair the existing system. • PO 41835-OS was issued on 1/7/04 to expedite the purchase of this system as there is an 8-10 week delivery time. 1 This action requires ratification of this emergency procurement by the Board of Directors, because the purchase of supplies services and materials exceed the General Manager's emergency authorization of $100,000. PRIOR COMMITTEEIBOARD ACTIONS N/A PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The emergency repair was not budgeted and is an unanticipated expense. However, the repair cost will be charged against the P2-60 construction project which is in the hands of the bonding company. Two quotes for fabricating the auger system were received; Motion Industries $145,000.00 plus tax and freight and Dynamic Fabrication Inc. $112,825.00 plus tax and freight. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. X This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The new Truck Loading Facility P2-60 was originally scheduled to be completed in July 2002. The contractor filed bankruptcy and the project has now been turned over to the bonding company with an estimated completion date of July 2004. The decision process for the appropriate amount of maintenance to be performed on the auger systems during the construction of the new facility was based on the original due date of July 2002. At the time the project started the auger units were in need of overhaul or replacement but it was determined that it would be more financially responsible to just perform scheduled maintenance and needed repairs when the unit failed. The material on the auger system is now un-repairable and in need of replacement. If the auger system goes out of service a backup loading system can be used. The backup system is unreliable due to the age of the equipment and it more than doubles the time required to load the trucks. If the emergency process failed while waiting for delivery of a replacement auger system the District would be unable to load trucks. H:1deptVagendatBoard Agenda Reports'Q041 Baard Agenda ReponsWWMItem 15,Emergency Repair TL Augers,doc Page 2 ALTERNATIVES Do nothing. This would increase the risk to the District of being unable to load biosolid trucks at Plant 2. CEQA FINDINGS Not Required ATTACHMENTS None MdepAagenda%oaal Agenda ReportM2004 Board Agenda Repert5k010wtern tS.Emergenw Repair TL"ers.Aoc Page 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 01/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: REALIGNMENT OF COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-13-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1 ) Establish a budget for Realignment of Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-13-1, in the amount of $103,000 for the reimbursement of Orange County Sanitation District's share of construction and staff costs; (2) Approve a reimbursement agreement with the City of Newport Beach for Realignment of Coast Highway Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-13-1 near Jamboree Road and Backbay Drive, in a form approved by General Counsel, for an estimated amount not to exceed $80,000-1 and (3) Authorize the General Manager to execute quitclaim deeds, in a form approved by General Counsel, to transfer the existing easement to the Irvine Company and the Orange County Public Facilities Resource Department, which upon project completion will no longer be required. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Coast Highway Trunk (CHT) currently connects into the OCSD Backbay Sewer at the entrance to the Newport Dunes, located near the intersection of Jamboree Road and Back Bay Drive in the City of Newport Beach (City). Just upstream of this connection, the CHT crosses into private property where OCSD owns an easement. This vacant property is being developed into a low income senior housing project. In order for the housing project to be built, a 300 foot segment of the CHT needs to be realigned around this area and re-connected. • The City has asked permission for the realignment to be performed as soon as possible since the Housing Project is scheduled to begin construction in March 2004. • The existing OCSD manholes in the segment to be realigned are in need of rehabilitation/replacement in the near future. If this pipe segment was not relocated, OCSD would be responsible for replacing these three manholes. • The proposed reimbursement agreement would contain the following provisions: The City will be responsible for the design and construction of the realignment and abandon in-place the existing unnecessary sewer. Page 1 OCSD will reimburse the City for half of the construction costs after the completion of the project. OCSD will have the authority to review all plans, inspect construction, and approve all change orders. The City will transfer ownership of the new sewer to OCSD after the project is complete. OCSD will obtain the new easement required in the Newport Dunes access road. The City has indicated that this easement will be granted at no cost by the Irvine Company. However, the City will pay for any easement costs should the Irvine Company decide to charge OCSD for the easement. OCSD will be responsible for any costs that will be required to obtain easements from the Orange County Public Facilities Resource Department. OCSD will quitclaim the easements no longer needed in the area of the re- alignment. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The estimated total construction cost for the realigned sewer is estimated not to exceed $83,000 for OCSD's share. This project is currently being designed by the City of Newport Beach and the actual construction costs will not be known until bids are received. Staff labor costs are estimated to be $20,000. Staff labor costs primarily consist of project management, administrative support and construction inspection. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A new budget totaling $103,000 is being requested as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None Page 2 c ALTERNATIVES Do not proceed with a reimbursement agreement. In this case, the City would bear the entire cost of construction. This will delay or seriously alter the plan for the City's Housing Project. CEQA FINDINGS The City of Newport Beach has certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. ATTACHMENTS Budget Table JDH:AN:gc:sa H:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\Agenda Report for Backbay Re-alignment Reimbursement Agreement.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REALIGNMENT OF COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT NO. 5.13-1 . ..... .... . ........... wis................ -W ...................... ........................ .......... ........ ...... ....... *.... ......................... ... ........... ................ .. .............. ..... .... ............... ................. .. ....... ................ . .. ....... ................... ................. ............. . . ..... .......... ... .................. ............... ...................... Phase I-Project Development ............... . ......................... .......... Phase 2-Pre5minary Design ...... ... --- .................. ................ .......... 7777777:7777 .............. Phase 3-Design ... ..... .... .. .................... ------ ........ .................—.... ......... ............ .............. .................. $ 103,000 Phase 4-Construction .. 0% ........... .. .. ........ ............. . ............ ............. Phase 5-Commissioning ..... ........ .. ...... ..................... . ......... ............ ......... ...........X.:....... ---------. ... ............ . .... ....... ................. Phase 6-Ctose-W .......... .......... ........... 1--l-1--......" :—, ...::... ....... 1............. .............. ..: .................... ................................... ................. ........ .................. ......................... ... . ........ ........... Phase 7-Contingency ........... ................ .................. ........... ............... ........---- --------- ................. ..... .... . ........ .................. ................I......... .................................... ......... ... ........... 103,000 PROJECT TOTAL ... 0% lReimbursable Costs . ........................ .................. PROJECT NET 1 $ 103,00 0% PSA/Contract ............. .......... .......... ::;: ..- ._............. ........................... .............. Design PSA ..... ........ ........... .......... ... ....... .............. ............. ............... Construction Contract ....... 83,000 0% C:%ffleNetWlPkjContract 6-13-1 Agenda Report Budget Table.xlslncg BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 01/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 17 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Project Manager SUBJECT: PEAK FLOW MANAGEMENT, JOB NO. J-67 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve plans and specification and Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 for Peak Flow Management, Job No. J-67, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a construction contract to Margate Construction, Inc. for Peak Flow Management, Job No. J-67, for an amount not to exceed $1,250,900. SUMMARY Background • The objective of Peak Flow Management, Job No. J-67, is primarily to assist the Orange County Sanitation District (District) in its commitment to successfully manage its peak flows; and thereby lessen or alleviate the potential emergency use of the 78-inch standby ocean outfall or discharges to the Santa Ana River. • The proposed construction contract will include improvements to existing facilities utilized during peak flow emergencies and will help the District effectively manage its current peak flows. A Peak Flow Management Master Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 is being developed at this time and is expected to be completed by July 2004. • The plans and specifications were completed by Water 3 Engineering in September 2003. Sealed bids were received on December 9, 2003. Summary information on the Job No. J-67 budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget: $11 ,257,000 Construction Budget: $ 7,001 ,000 Engineer's Estimate: $ 1 ,500,000 Low Responsive Bid: $ 1 ,250,900 High Bid: $ 1,547,413 Number of Bids: 4 • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to Margate Construction, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $1,250,900. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACITONS None Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of $1,250,900 for the construction contract is being requested. This authorization is within the project Construction Phase budget. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGET IMPACT 0 This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 03/04, Section 8, Page 72) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This construction contract includes improvements to existing facilities utilized during peak flow emergencies and will help the District effectively manage its current peak flows. A Peak Flow Management Master Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 is being developed at this time and is expected to be completed by July 2004. The master plan will include the following: • Further study of existing plant deficiencies. • Development of a drainage master plan for future projects to follow. • Recommendations for further Improvements to existing plant facilities. The existing budget anticipated building equalization ponds at Plant No. 2, however the decision to build secondary treatment facilities in the same area have stopped that effort. This project will be rebudgeted next fiscal year to support the reduced scope of the project. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA, Section 15301 (b) and 15302 (b), and District guidelines. The Notice of Exemption was filed with the County of Orange on November 4, 2003 ATTACHMENTS 1 . Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation RW:lc:jo H:\ntglobaNWgenda Draft Reports\Joint BoardsU-67-Peak Flow Management AR 012804.doc Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Peak Flow Management JOB NO. J-67 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED BUDGET PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTIPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO DECREASE BUDGET BUDGET CREASEI BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) DECREASE Project Development $ 12,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 19,643 98% Preliminary Design $ 52,000 $ 77,000 $ 77,000 $ 77,000 $ - $ 77,000 $ 30,096 39% Design $ 1,230,000 $ 1,230,000 $ 1,230,000 $ 1.230,000 $ 1,230,000 $ 1,121,669 91% Construction $ 8,543,000 $ 8,543,000 $ 8,543,000 $ 400,000 $ 1.250,900 $ 1,650,900 $ 13,615 1% Commissioning $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10.000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - 0% Close-Out $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - 0% Contingency $ 1,400,000 $ 1,367,000 $ 1,367,000 $ - PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 11,257,000 1 $ 11,257,000 1 $ - $ 11,257.000 $ 1,747,000 $ 1.250,9001 $ 2,997,900 $ 1,185,023 1 40% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 11,257,000 $ 11,257,000 $ - $ 11,257,000 ;,i: $ 1,747,000 1 $ 1,250,900 $ 2,997,900 1 $ 1,185,023 400/6 PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 1,103,789 $ - $ 1,103,789 .',v $ 1,103,789 $ 1,103,789 $ 960,536 87% Construction Contract $ 7,001,000 $ 5,750.100 $ 1,250,900 '' $ 1.250,900 ,$ 1,250,900 0% 003761742 December 9, 2003 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM 1\10.:3 BID TABULATION PEAK FLOW MANAGEMENT JOB NO.J-67 Engineer's Estimate: $1,500,000 Construction Contract Budget: $7,001,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1 . Margate Construction, Inc. S 1 ,250,900 2. J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. S 1,394,409 3. Norman A. Olsson Construction, Inc. $ 1,431 ,500 4. S.S. Mechanical Corp. S 1,547,413 5. S 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. in the bid amount of $1,250,900 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering DAL:UM:jo 003760308 C TileNetWIPU-67 Bid Tab.doc Revised 05/19/98 OCSD • P 0 Box 8127 . Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 01/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 18 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Milind Joshi, Project Manager SUBJECT: Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment Job No. P2-82 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1 ) Approve Plans and Specifications and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a construction contract to Norman A. Olsson Construction, Inc. for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, for an amount not to exceed $2,778,985 SUMMARY • This contract is for construction of miscellaneous improvements to utility and pumping systems at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The improvements consist of replacement of corroded portions of steam lines, modifications to the Plant Water and Reclaimed Water systems, rehabilitation and replacement of equipment and utilities in the Plant Water Pump Station, modifications to the Chlorine Pump Station, and miscellaneous activities supporting these major project elements. • The Plans and Specifications were completed by CGvL in October 2003. Sealed bids were received on December 2, 2003. Summary information on the Job No. P2-82 budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget: $4,928,937 Construction Budget: $3,178,448 Engineer's Estimate: S3,141 ,000 Low Responsive Bid: $2,778,985 High Bid: $3,483,891 Number of Bids: 5 • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to Norman A. Olsson Construction, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $2,778,985. H:\dephagenda\Board Agenda Reports`2004 Board Agenda Repons\0104\I1em 18.P2.82.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of $2,778,985 for the construction contract is being requested. This authorization is within the project construction phase budget. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2003-04 Budget Book, Page 8-83) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS A Notice of Exemption was filed with the Clerk-Recorder of the County of Orange on September 15, 2003 for the work taking place under this contract. ATTACHMENTS 1 . Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation MJ Jo H:tdepltagenda\Board Agenda Reports12004 Board Agenda Reports1010411tem 18.P2-82.doc Revised 06/04/03 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment JOB NO. P2-82 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT 6t7DGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) /DECREASE Phase 1 -Project Development $ 13,000 S 46,000 S 46,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 S 45,574 101% Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ 120,000 S 28,000 S 28,000 S 27,000 S S 27,000 S 27,295 101% Phase 3-Design $ 39,000 $ 700,000 $ $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ $ 700,000 $ 734,308 105% Phase 4-Construction $ 626,000 $ 3,687,000 $ $ 3,687,000 $ 508,552 S 2,778,985 $ 3,287,537 $ 10,899 0% Phase 5-Commissioning S 202,000 S 130,000 S $ 130,000 S 130,000 S 130.000 S 2,104 Phase 6-Close-Out S - S 33,000 S 33,000 S 33,000 $ 33,000 S 2,519 Phase 7-Contingency $ - S 305,000 $ 305,000 $ - S - S - PROJECT TOTAL $ 1,000.000 $ 4,929.000 $ $ 4,929,000 $ 1,443,552 $ 2,778,985 $ 4,222,537 $ 822,699 190,10 Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET S 1,000,000 S 4,929.000 5 S 4,929,000 S 1,443,552 $ 2.778,985 S 4,222,537 S 822, 999 19% PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 39,000 $ 630,000 $ $ 630.000 S 628,426 5 $ 628,426 $ - Construction Contract $ 626,000 $ 3,178,448 $ $ 3,178,448 $ - 5 2,778,985 $ 2,778.985 $ 003760648 EWAS 003760648 i December 2, 2003 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NOS. 1 & 2: BID TABULATION PLANT UTILITIES REHABILITATION & REFURBISHMENT Job No. P2-82 Engineer's Estimate: $3,141,000 Construction Contract Budget: $3,687,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Norman A. Olsson Construction, Inc. $ 2,778,985 2. Atlas-Allied, Inc $ 3,066,000 3. Drexal Power Inc $ 3,099,000 4. S.S. Mechanical Corp. $ 3,376,737 5. J.F. Shea Construction Inc. $ 3,483,891 6. $ 7 $ 8. $ I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Norman A. Olsson Construction Inc. in the bid amount of $2,778,985 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering C\FileNetWIP\P2-82 Bid Tab doc Revised 05/19/98 OCSD • P.O. Box 8127 . Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 01/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 19 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: David May, Project Manager SUBJECT: Rehabilitation of Crystal Cove Pump Station Contract No. 5-54 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-54, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a construction contract to L.H. Engineering Co. for Rehabilitation of Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-54, for an amount not to exceed $144,806.85 SUMMARY • This contract is for construction improvements to the facility, located in unincorporated Orange County at 7423 E. Pacific Coast Highway. The improvements consist of landscaping, paving, masonry wall demolition and construction, and miscellaneous activities supporting these major project elements. • The Plans and Specifications were completed by Lee & Ro, Inc. in October 2003. Sealed bids were received on November 25, 2003. Summary information on the Contract No. 5-54 budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget; $1,511 ,749,00 Construction Budget: $ 428,879.00 Engineer's Estimate: $ 148,623.00 Low Responsive Bid: $ 144,806.85 High Bid: S 189,597.00 Number of Bids- 8 • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to L.H. Engineering Co. for an amount not to exceed $144,806.85. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of $144,806.85 for the construction contract is being requested. This authorization is within the project Construction Phase budget. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for more information. Wdepnagenda\Board Agenda Reporis\2004 Board Agenda Reports\0104\Item 19.5.54.doc Revised: 06l04/03 Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2003-04 Budget Book, Page 8-24) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The project was originally conceived and budgeted to address exterior and interior rehabilitation and improvements at the Crystal Cove pump station facility. Exterior improvements require additional land acquisition. The adjacent property owner, the Crystal Cove Community Association (HOA), was planning landscaping improvements to their property at the time the District approached them about possible property acquisition. The additional land the District desired is located on the HOA property. The District verbally agreed to add the HOA planned improvements as part of the District Contract. The cost for this work would have been borne by the District with or without an agreement, as District construction damaging HOA improvements would have required an equal or better replacement of damaged area. Due to the cooperation of the District in this matter, the HOA offered the easement at no cost to the District. This construction contract covers a portion of the work currently budgeted. It is anticipated that Staff will create a new project to cover the remaining interior rehabilitation efforts needed at the facility. The new project will be funded by transferring the remaining budget left over after the exterior improvements have been completed. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS A Notice of Exemption was filed with the Clerk-Recorder of the County of Orange on June 25, 2003 for the work taking place under this contract. ATTACHMENTS 1 . Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation DM:lc:ba WdepMgend3\Board Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Reporlst010411tem 19.5.54.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 J BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Rehabilitation of Crystal Cove Pump Station Contract No. 5-54 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTIPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGETREVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE/DECREASE BUDGET DATE RE4UEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) Phase 1 -Project Development $ 3,806 $ 3,806 $ $ 3,806 $ 3,806 $ - $ 3,806 $ 3,806 100% Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ 23,078 $ 23,078 $ $ 23,078 $ 23,078 $ $ 23,078 $ 23,078 100% Phase 3-Design $ 231,639 $ 231,639 $ $ 231,639 $ 231,639 $ - $ 231.639 $ 171,774 74% Phase 4-Construction $ 554,971 $ 554,971 S $ 554,971 $ 126,092 $ 144,807 $ 270.899 $ 5,228 2% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 19,343 $ 19,343 $ - $ 19,343 $ 15,651 $ - $ 15,651 $ 4,940 32% Phase 6-Close-Out $ 13,042 $ 13,042 $ $ 13,042 $ 12,156 $ $ 12,156 $ - 0% Phase 7-Contingency $ 665,870 $ 665,870 $ $ 665,870 $ - $ $ - $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 1,511.749 $ 1.511,749 $ $ 1,511,749 1 1 $ 412,4221 $ 144,807 1 $ 557,229 $ 208,826 37% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 1,511.749 $ 1,511.749 $ $ 1,511,749 1] $ 412,422 1 $ 144,807 $ 557,229 $ 208,826 37% PSA/Contract Task Order 03-15 $ 34,800 $ 46,484 $ - $ 46,484 $ 46,484 $ - $ 46,484 $ 34,800 75% Construction Contract $ 428,879 $ 428,879 $ - $ 428,879 S 144,807 $ 144,807 0% EDMS:003757328 November 25, 2003 11:00 a.m. BID TABULATION Rehabilitation of Crystal Cove Pump Station Contract No. 5-54 Engineer's Estimate: $148,623 Construction Contract Budget: $428,879 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. L.H. Engineering Company $ 144,806.85* 2.Paulus Engineering, Inc. $ 149,249.00 3. Big Ben, Inc. $ 160,000.00 4. Atlas-Allied, Inc. $ 163,655.00 5. Castillo Western Industrial, Inc. $ 167,110.00 6. Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. $ 182,400.00 7. Norman A Olsson Construction, Inc. $ 183,000.00 8. Denboer Engineering & Construction, Inc. $ 189,597.00 9. Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. $ No Bid I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to LH ENGINEERING CO. in the bid amount of$144,806.85 as the lowest and best bid. *Corrected amount. LH Engineering Co.'s in rect total was $144,770.96. l David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering Revised 05/19/98 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd. Dir. 1/28/0/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number zo Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Hardat Khublall, Engineer SUBJECT: GISLER-REDHILL TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS, REACH "A", CONTRACT NO.7-36; ORANGE TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO.7-39; GISLER-REDHILL/NORTH TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO.7-41 ; AND CITY OF TUSTIN PROJECT NUMBERS 6106 AND 6151. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1 ) Approve plans and specifications and Addendum No. 1 for Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A", Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41 , on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a Construction Contract to ARB, Inc., for Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A" Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; G isle r-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41; and City of Tustin Project Nos. 6106 and 6151, for an amount not to exceed $18,375,999. SUMMARY • These three trunk sewer projects consist of improvements to relieve hydraulic deficiencies on three separate sewers as identified in the 1999 Strategic Plan. These separate sewer improvement projects are being managed as one construction contract for improved efficiency and coordination. • At the request of the City of Tustin, the District has bid and will also administer two City water line projects located in the same area as the District's sewer lines. The bid amount on these two projects are as follows: Project No. 6106 $ 154,097 Project No. 6151 $ 511 ,114 Total Bid Amount $ 665,211 District staff along with City staff and General Counsel are working on the preparation of a reimbursement agreement to have the bid amount plus a 5 percent administrative fee deposited by the City with the District for payment of their portion of the work. This agreement will be presented for approval at the February PDC/Board and will be executed prior to issuing a Notice to proceed on these projects. Page 1 Revised: 06104/03 • The plans and specifications were completed by AKM Consulting Engineers in October 2003. Sealed bids were received on December 16, 2003. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows: Contract 7-36 Contract 7-39 Contract 7-41 Total Project Budget $7,066,698 $5,297,929 $14,987,780 $27,352,407 Construction Budget $4,980,867 $4,120,000 $10,753,817 $19,848,417 Engineer's Estimate $5,053,837 $3,795,906 $10,970,885 $19,820,628 Low Responsive Bid $4,246,443 $4,113,733 $ 9,350,612 $17,710,788 High Bid $6,321,159 $6,193,303 $10,951,403 $23,465,865 Number of Bids 5 5 5 5 • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to the low bidder ARB, Inc., for an amount not to exceed S18,375,999 which is the sum of the District's work ($17,710,788) and the City of Tustin's work ($665,211). PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The Board of Directors authorized a construction budget increase at its October 22, 2003 meeting in the amount of $4,162,334, increasing the construction budget to $19,848,417. This request was made to match the latest engineer's estimate for construction. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of $18,375,999 is being requested for the Construction of Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A", Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41 ; and the City of Tustin Project No. 6106 and 6151. Refer to the attached Budget Information Table for details on the District's projects. The City of Tustin will deposit funds through a reimbursement agreement with the District to cover the cost for construction and administration of the City's water line projects. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 2003/04 CIP Budget Section 8, page 37) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Although the three projects will be constructed under one construction contract, each project has its own budget. Page 2 Revised 06/04103 The projects are located within the Cities of Tustin and Orange and unincorporated areas of the County of Orange and consist of approximately 40,000 feet of sewer ranging in size from 8-inch to 27-inch in diameter. The Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A", Contract No. 7-36, is located along Redhill Avenue between Mitchell Avenue and La Colina Drive. The Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39, is located along Holt Avenue between Newport Avenue and Warren Avenue; along Seventeenth Street between Esplanade Avenue and Hewes Avenue; and along Hewes Avenue between Seventeenth Street and Fairhaven Avenue. The Gisler- Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41, is located along Newport Avenue between Mitchell Avenue and El Camino Real; along El Camino Real between Newport Avenue and Main Street; along Main Street between El Camino Real and Prospect Avenue; and along Prospect Avenue between Third Street and Chapman Avenue. ALTERNATIVES No viable alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report that was certified on October 27, 1999. A notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Bid Summary HK:jo:lc H:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft ReportsWoint Boardsl7-36 7-39 7-41 Agenda Report 122203.doe Page 3 Revised: 06/04/03 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GISLER-REDHILL TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS, REACH "A" CONTRACT NO. 7-36. ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTIPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) /DECREASE Phase 1 -Project Development $ 45,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 29,810 99% Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ 67,000 $ 67,000 $ 67,000 $ 67,000 $ 6,787 10% Phase 3-Design $ 369,000 $ 417,000 $ 417,000 $ 417,000 $ 417,000 $ 370,062 89% Phase 4-Construction $ 6,386,000 $ 5,660,298 $ 5,660,298 $ 679,431 $ 4,246,443 $ 4,925,874 Phase 5-Commissioning $ 90,437 $ 90,437 $ 90,437 $ 90,437 Phase 6-Close-Out $ 22,608 $ 22,608 $ 22,608 $ 22,608 Phase 7-Contingency $ 1,032,000 $ 779,355 $ 779,355 PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 7,832,0001 $ 7,066,698 1 $ - $ 7,066,698 1 1 $ 1,306,476 1 $ 4,246.4431 $ 5.552,919 1 $ 406,659 7% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 7,832,000 1 $ 7,066,698 $ - $ 7,066,698 11 $ 1,306,476 S 4,246,443 $ 5,552,919 $ 406,659 7% PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 223,176 $ 255,461 1 1 $ 255.461 11 Construction Contract $ 6,386,000 $ 4,980,867 $ - 1 $ 4,980,867 $ 0 $ 4,246,443 $ 4,246,443 $ 0 0% EDMS ITEM ID:003761135 . 4L �' BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ORANGE TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. 7-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTIPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) iDECREASE Phase 1 -Project Development $ 37,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 31,773 99% Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 3,441 5% Phase 3-Design $ 326,000 $ 320,999 $ 320,999 $ 320,999 $ 320,999 $ 300,112 93% Phase 4-Construction $ 4,718,000 $ 4,251,415 $ 4,251,415 $ 137,682 $ 4,113,733 $ 4,251,415 Phase 5-Commissioning $ 61,735 $ 61,735 $ 61,735 $ 61,735 Phase 6-Close-Out $ 15,434 $ 15,434 $ 15,434 $ 15,434 Phase 7-Contingency $ 759,000 $ 546.346 $ 546,346 PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 5,840,000 1 $ 5,297,929 $ $ 5,297,929 $ 637,850 $ 4.113,733 $ 4,751,5831 $ 335,326 7% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 5,840,000 1 $ 5,297,929 1 $ 5,297,929 11 $ 637,850 1 $ 4,113,733 $ 4,751,583 $ 335.326 1 7% PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 224,098 $ 236,641 $ 236,641 1--1 Construction Contract $ 4,718,000 $4.120,000 $ $ 4,120,000 $ 0 $ 4,113,733 $ 4,113.733 $ 0 0% EDMS ITEM ID:003761140 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GISLER-REDHILUNORTH TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. 7-41 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTIPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE/DECREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) Phase 1 -Project Development $ 45,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 39,484 99% Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ 112,200 $ 112,200 $ 112,200 $ 112,200 $ 1,126 1% Phase 3-Desi n $ 465,000 $ 515,999 $ 515,999 $ 515,999 $ 515,999 $ 490,877 95% Phase 4-Construction $ 13,600,000 $ 12,521,621 $ 12,521,621 $ 1.767,804 $ 9,350,612 $ 11,118,416 $ 234,229 2% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 169.241 $ 169,241 $ 169,241 $ 169,241 $ 14,340 8% Phase 6-Close-Out $ 42,310 $ 42,310 $ 42,310 $ 42,310 $ 3,305 8% Phase 7-Contingency $ 2,206,000 $ 1,586.409 $ 1,586,409 PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 16.316.000 1 $ 14,987,780 1 $ 14,987,780 1 1 $ 2,647,5541 1 $ 11,998,166 1 $ 783,361 1 7% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 16,316,000 1 $ 14,987,780 1 $ 14,987,780 $ 2,647,554 1 1 $ 11,998,166 $ 783,361 1 7% PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 368,684 1 $ 382,176 1 $ 382,176 fl Construction Contract $ 13,600,000 1 $ 10,753,817 $ 10,753,817 $ 234,229 $ 9,350.612 $ 9,584,841 $ 234,229 2% EDMS ITEM ID:003761143 -1 December 16, 2003 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NO.1 BID TABULATION Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A" Contract No. 7-36, Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39, Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41, City of Tustin, Project Nos. 6151 & 6106 Engineer's Estimate: $20,444,748 Construction Contract Budget: $19,848,417 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. ARB, INC. $ 18,375,999.00 2. KEC ENGINEERING $ 18,735,758.00 3. KEN THOMPSON, INC. $ 18,998,910.00 4. STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION $ 19,321,000.00 5. MLADEN BUNTICH $ 23,963,000.00 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to ARB, INC. in the bid amount of $18,375,999 as the lowest and best bid. *Corrected amount. Ken Thompson, Inc.'s incorrect total was $18,999,000. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering C:1FileNETWIPI7-36 Bid Tab.doc Revised 05/19/98 OCSD P.O. Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 1/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 21 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TO REVIEW AND TO COLLECT SEWER SERVICE USER CHARGES ASSESSED NOW RESIDENTIAL PARCELS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (a) Reject the unsolicited proposal submitted by Revenue Enhancement Group, dated November 2003, Identifying Undercharged Commercial Parcels; and, (b) Direct staff to evaluate non-residential parcels to determine if those parcels have been undercharged for annual sewer service user fees and, if so, to collect the proper charges on the property tax bill on a going forward basis. SUMMARY The FAHR Committee reviewed the attached Agenda Report, Staff Report and consultant's proposal and a verbal presentation from the consultant's lobbyist at their December meeting. The Committee voted to move the proposal directly to the Board without a Committee recommendation. Staff and General Counsel have now resolved some issues that were uncertain at the time of the meeting. Discussion of these issues and of the proposal, itself is included in this Agenda Report. The original Agenda Report that was received by the FAHR Committee is attached for additional background information. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The Revenue Enhancement Group proposal for this work is $2.5 million plus 15% of any identified undercharges over $3.5 million. The proposal is for undercharges to be calculated for the current tax year and for the prior four tax years, for a total of five years. An additional amount of $90 per parcel would be charged if the number of parcels reviewed exceeds 28,608, in addition to the 15%. The first S1 million would be due when the contract is signed. The work is proposed to be completed by August 1 , 2004. No competitive proposals have been solicited from other potential consultants. However, staff has discussed a hypothetical project of this type with two other "direct assessment' firms. One firm said it would definitely submit a proposal if asked and the other said it would not, because of its work for property owners and the potential for a conflict of interest. Revenue Enhancement Group has told the Directors, and claims in their proposal that there are recoverable undercharges of at least $3.5 million. This would be the total of alleged undercharges for five years, not the annual undercharge or recovery. One of the other consultants that staff contacted estimated that statistically there could be as much as $1 million per year, but it had no real data. The other reported that it seldom came across undercharges while researching for refund clients. The cost for staff to complete the review of the non-residential parcels that have not already been reviewed, including site visits is estimated to be 1,440 person days, or about 6 person years. To complete the work in six months with staff and temporary employees would require an additional 12 employees for the six months. The staff proposal is to use existing staff and 6 temporary employees to complete the work in 12 months. Staff estimates the review could be completed in-house for under $250,000. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. X This item has not been budgeted. (See Additional Information below) ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following review of the Revenue Enhancement Group proposal will refer to the Action Plan sections in order, but will only summarize. The full proposal is attached to the FAHR Committee Agenda Report. 1 ) Review 28,608 commercial parcels to verify use code and square footage. The number of parcels proposed is the number of parcels that have not been previously reviewed by staff or other consultants. The non-residential parcels total nearly 55,000. Staff has access to many of the same tools that are proposed; we currently use the Win2Data system and the internet to review parcels and we conduct site visits when adjustments are requested. Staff has the knowledge and experience to research and to review the remaining parcels. 2) Create a database of parcel information. Over the past year, staff and the County of Orange have worked together to develop a special database for OCSD and to house this database in-house on our own computer network. This database includes all of the proposed information with the exception of the Wdepl\agendalBoard Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Reporls\0104\I1em 2I.Revenue Enhancement Group.do- Revised: 8120101 Page 2 editorial comments evaluating prior years' charges. Of course the existing data may need to be updated as a part of the review process, but the database will not need to be replaced. The database proposed by REG has no additional value to staff. 3) Deliver the database to OCSD. As noted above, the proposed database provides no additional value above that provided by staff. 4) REG will prepare invoices, cover letters, etc. Adjustments to building size or use for the upcoming fiscal year can be made to the database in time to put the proper fee for the year on the property tax bill. Invoices will not be necessary if the corrections are made on a going forward basis. Invoices will only be necessary if property owners are to be charged for prior year undercharges and if any are discovered. 5) REG will expand its call center to handle property owner inquiries. Answering the questions and concerns of ratepayers and voters is a responsibility of OCSD staff. This very important function and community relations opportunity must be supervised by OCSD employees. The number and tenor of ratepayer phone calls will be considerably lessened with the staff proposal that does not require special invoices to be mailed. 6) REG will submit a monthly progress briefing to the FAHR, the Board or staff. Regular reporting should be a part of any program and is included in the General Manager's recommendation. While there are other issues that must be addressed while considering the REG proposal, whether the Board desires to assess and to collect any fees that were undercharged for the prior four years is one of the more significant. The design of the review program and especially the design of the collections program will hinge upon this very important factor. General Counsel has advised staff that the Board has no specific time frame in which to decide whether to pursue collection for prior years. The Board's past actions of setting rates for each of the parcels for each year were discretionary acts based upon the best available information at the time, strictly following all of the procedural requirements of the State law and of the District's Ordinance. Staff recommends that we proceed by looking forward. (The fee and commission proposed by REG is based upon identified adjustments for the current year and the prior four years.) Only one official proposal has been received. There has been no competition for this work and the scope of work was developed by the vendor. If the Directors desire for the work to be performed by a consultant, then staff recommends and believes that a $2.5 million personal services contract should be competitively bid. It is possible that some parcels that may have been overcharged will also be discovered in the review process. Staff proposes that these adjustments should also be made when appropriate. There is no provision in the proposal for this; we do not know if REG H:\depl\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Reports10104Utem 21.Revenue Enhancement Group.doc Revised: M0/01 Page 3 expects to be compensated for this data. The proposal is for additional compensation if the identified undercharges exceed an accumulation of$3.5 million for the five-year period. Whether that amount is net of refunds, or in addition to any refunds, must be established, but almost certainly it is the gross amount identified and refunds are not considered. Further, the proposal does not require REG to notify OCSD of any overcharges. OCSD must be notified. REG cannot be allowed to mine the database for future refund clients at our expense. Over the many years that staff has been administering the property use and size-based user fee program we have revised the database for many parcels. Most often these adjustments have been the result of actual sewer system use, verified by water purchase data. This means that the Assessor's database and other commercially available databases will differ from the District's. REG does not have the District's database or all of our prior adjustments. REG will definitely identify some non- residential parcels that are charged less than the standard charge because of these adjustments; maybe some are already included in the estimated undercharges. The proposal would require the District to pay REG for the difference even though the District caused the difference and the user fee is correct. ALTERNATIVES 1. Direct staff to conduct a formal RFP process, compare the results to the costs to complete the process in house and return to FAHR with a recommendation. 2. Direct staff to improve the database in house over an extended time period using fewer temporary employees. 3. Direct staff to improve the database in house over an extended time period using a combination of additional FTEs and temporary employees. Two additional FTEs would ensure that the database was reviewed and updated annually. 4. Direct staff to determine the feasibility of agreements with all or several firms that process refund requests to also process undercharge adjustments on a contingency basis. 5. Authorize the consultant's work but do not go back four years to collect past undercharges. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Agenda Report and attachments from December 10, 2003 FAHR Committee meeting GGS H:ldeptlagendalBoard Agenda Reports%2004 Board Agenda Reports10104Utem 21.Revenue Enhancement Group.doc Revised: W0ro1 Page 4 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: January 19, 2004 RE: Collection of Underpaid Sewer Service Charges This Opinion is submitted in response to certain questions and concerns expressed by Directors at the FAHR Committee Meeting in December. ISSUES: 1. Does the District have the authority to collect underpayments by a property owner for more than the current year? 2. Can the amounts of the underpayments be collected on the tax roll in lieu of direct billing? 3. If underpayments are billed to the property owner, do they become a lien on the property? 4. If the District Board determines to not seek payment for prior years' underpayments, does it constitute an unlawful gift of public funds? ANSWERS: 1. Yes, the District is authorized to bill and collect from a customer for the amount of any underpayments for as many as four (4) years. 2. Yes, in limited cases. There is express legislative authority (California Health & Safety Code Sections 5473(a) et seq.)to collect delinquent amounts on the tax roll. 3. The underpayments can and may become a lien on the property if not timely paid. 4. No. If reasonable justification of cost of collection exceeds the amount collected, the discretionary act to not pursue collection does not constitute a gift of public funds. enda January 20, 2004 Page 2 1 DISCUSSION: 1. The governing law re ability of the District to collect charges for prior years, is found in the California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 343 and 345. Section 343 establishes a four-year statute of limitations for any action which does not have a different specific limit. There are no provisions specifically provided for collection of fees and charges. Section 345 provides, "The [statute of] limitations prescribed in this Chapter apply to actions brought in the name of the State [the District as a political subdivision of the State] for the benefit of the State . . . in the same manner as actions by private parties." 2. The District has historically collected its sewer service charges on the Orange County property tax roll, as authorized by Health and Safety Code Section 5473. In lieu of billing each of the approximately 475,000 customers directly, the District uses the services of the Orange County Assessor and Tax Collector. It is our opinion that charges unbilled by the District for past years are "delinquent", although certain enforcement methods such as imposing a lien upon the property, are not available to be used by the District until all procedures, such as notice, holding a protest hearing, and making a determination of majority protest or not, are completed. Once all the procedures have been completed and the information is provided to the County Assessor and Tax Collector, the charges will be included on the next tax roll and will be collected in the same manner as all other taxes, fees, and charges. It should be noted that the provisions of Health & Safety Code Section 5473.2 provide for a mandatory hearing to consider objections and protests. If there is a protest by a majority of the property owners, then the past charges can still be levied but cannot be collected on the tax roll. The District would be required to bill the owner by direct invoice. There is no prior authority to guide us as to whether the "majority protest" is based on 50.1% of all properties on the notice, or 50.1% of the owners of each parcel. Under both Section 5473 and California Constitution Article XIIIC and D, a majority is based on the total population given notice. However, because there will be differing amounts due from each of the parcels, an argument can be made that each parcel owner is receiving a different and separate notice, and thus, only a majority of the owners of that parcel could effectively bar the tax roll collection. Rather than invite legal challenges and expenditures to defend them, it is our recommendation that any parcel owners that submit a protest be billed directly, and all others be submitted to the County for collection. enda January 20, 2004 Page 4 ' Recognizing that the District will incur expense in collecting the amounts due, that it will incur considerable work force issues such as reassigning supervisory duties of Finance Department Staff to oversee a group of short-term employees, it may well conclude that the cost of collection could equal or exceed the amount collected, particularly as there is no guarantee of success in collecting all outstanding sums. For example, many properties will have changed owners during the past four (4) years, and collecting it all from the current owner poses significant legal obstacles. Thus, the District could effectively benefit by not having to incur the collection costs related to past underbilled charges, and therefore, such action is not deemed a gift even though private persons are also benefited. SUMMARY: The District is legally authorized to levy and collect charges for sewer service determined to be undercharged in prior levies for up to four (4) years past, and after notice and hearing, can have the charges placed on the County property tax rolls for collection, with enforcement as a lien on the property if not paid. The Board, after hearing Staff Reports, including the costs and related issues to back charge for 1-4 years, can determine that to do so is not warranted, and thus, would not constitute a gift of public funds. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:PJ cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed enda January 20, 2004 Page 3 3. Once the charges are approved by the Board, submitted to the County, and placed on the tax roll, they become a lien on the property until paid with all other taxes due or until foreclosed by the County Tax Collector. 4. A specific concern has been raised concerning whether a decision to forego the collection of charges due for past year services constitutes a violation of California Constitution Article XVI, Section 6, by making a gift of public funds. The Appellate Court, in the recently-published Opinion of Westly v. U.S. Bancorp, et al., 12/16/03 provides: "II Gift of Public Funds Article XVI, section 6 of the California Constitution provides in pertinent part: `The Legislature shall have no power . . . to make any gift or authorize the making of any gift, of any public money or thing of value to any individual, municipal or other corporation whatever. . . .' Civil Code Section 1146 defines a gift as 'a transfer of personal property, made voluntarily, and without consideration.' Notwithstanding, the gift the Constitution prohibits is not limited to personal property, `but includes all appropriations of public money for which there is no authority or enforceable claim, or which perchance may rest upon some moral or equitable obligation.' . . . The cancellation of a debt may constitute a gift even though nothing is transferred. . . . Thus, the cancellation of uncollected property taxes is a gift that is unconstitutional unless it is for a public purpose. . . ." . . For these reasons the forgiveness of interest charges constitutes a 'thing of value,' as provided in article XVI, section 6 of the California Constitution, and absent consideration for the forgiveness, constitutes a gift of public funds." . . . A reason that would remove a gift from the ambit of article XVI, section 6 is that it is to be used for a public rather than a private purpose. . . . That is because `[t]he benefit to the state from an expenditure for a public purpose is in the nature of consideration and the funds expended are therefore not a gift even though private persons are benefited there from."' enda FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 12/10/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-111 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: CONSIDER PROPOSAL FOR UNDERCHARGED COMMERCIAL PARCELS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Consider proposal submitted by Revenue Enhancement Group (REG), dated November 2003, Identifying Undercharged Commercial Parcels; and, 2) Direct staff to return to the FAHR Committee for approval of a Request for Proposal for some or all of the services proposed by REG; -OR- 3) Direct staff to return to the FAHR Committee with alternatives to administrating the current sewer user fee program. SUMMARY Since 1981, an increasingly larger portion of the District has collected annual sewer service user fees as a separate line item on the property tax bill. Our user fee is currently based upon the property use code and the building square feet in the County Assessor's database. We have purchased a copy of that database and each year we purchase the annual adjustments and changes for our use in developing and assessing annual fees. Currently, our copy of the 530,000 parcel database is maintained in-house on the District's computer network. One of our challenges is how to best administer the program to minimize over- and under-charges of the nearly 55,000 non-residential parcels that are charged each year. The total sewer user fees levied for 2003-04 was $88.4 million. Non-residential users make up approximately $28.9 million of that. In 1999, the FAHR Committee and the Board authorized staff to hire a consultant to review parcels that had not been charged user fees, including those parcels owned by governmental agencies. The cost of that contract was $1 million and the user fees that were generated have exceeded $4 million each year since that work. The scope of this contract was very limited however, and not all parcels were reviewed. In February 2003, the FAHR Committee reviewed a proposal from the Revenue Enhancement Group (REG) to provide "sole source" services to review every non- residential parcel in the database. REG proposed to evaluate the square feet and the property use code assigned to these parcels, to provide a listing of those parcels that were "incorrectly" coded, to act as District representatives to answer customer questions, and to create a database at the District. REG requested a flat fee and a percentage of any changes, essentially the same as their current proposal which is attached. After considerable discussion, the FAHR Committee directed staff to consider alternatives including a competitive selection process for outside services, to look at in- house alternatives and to determine what other agencies do and to return with additional information. Committee Chairman Brady has recently asked staff to put a discussion item on the agenda for this meeting to allow the Directors to discuss a November 2003 proposal from REG. This proposal was delivered to staff via email on November 30, 2003. The owner of REG, Bob Lockhart, and his lobbyist, Adam Probolsky have indicated they will attend the meeting to discuss the November 2003 proposal with the Directors. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The Revenue Enhancement Group proposal for this work is $2.5 million plus 15% of any identified undercharges over$3.5 million. Undercharges would be calculated for the current tax year and for the prior four tax years, for a total of five years. A flat amount of$90 per parcel would be assessed if the number of parcels reviewed exceeds 28,608. The first $1 million would be due when the contract is signed. The work is proposed to be completed by August 1, 2004, so those corrected sewer service fees could be placed on the 2004-05 property tax bills. There are no provisions in the proposal regarding future maintenance and or adjustment of the database. Alternative methods of reaching the goal of this project would result in costs that are different from those proposed. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. (See Additional Information below) ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Because we use a database that was originally created for a use other than ours, some of the data does not match our needs. Sometimes the use code is very broad and covers a wide range of business and of sewer use, such as code 114 for industrial parks. Sometimes the square footage of a building is missing or incorrect. These types H.Weptlagenda%Board Agenda ReportMON Board Agenda Reportet0104\Item 21.2.doc Revised: 8/20/01 Page 2 a of errors are not significant for the Assessor's intended use, but are significant for calculating our user fee. Over the past several years, some firms have challenged our property use and building size based fees. Our fee ordinance allows adjustments to the assumed user fee if a more accurate use can be demonstrated. Proof of water purchases and actual building size and use are generally required. Because our fees are collected on the general property tax bill, users are eligible for adjustments for the current tax year and the four preceding tax years. The firms that find these adjustments are generally paid a percentage of the refund or rebate that their client receives. Because our non-residential fees are based upon average flow, BOD and TSS discharges for user categories, there will also be a number of users who are currently undercharged. How many and how much are not known at this time. The Revenue Enhancement Group has suggested that they could find many non- residential properties that are currently undercharged. While they normally work on a contingency basis with their private clients, they would combine a fee and contingency arrangement for any work with us. The contingency portion could be an addition to their flat fee based upon the amount of unbilled sewer fees that they find. The District's database has been continually updated to reflect any errors or omissions that have been discovered by staff, these consultants or the users themselves. Several non-residential properties have had their square feet reduced in this database so that the annual fee calculation reflects historical water use and additional refunds are avoided. During their last discussion the Committee considered several related issues that could impact the proposal or an RFP process. These are summarized below. i. Will we assess undercharges for the prior four years,just as we allow refunds? Most public agencies do not do this, but it is legal. The argument for doing it is that it is fair and legal. If overcharges are refunded, then undercharges should be collected. The argument against doing it is that the user did nothing to cause the undercharge. They paid what we billed them; our process caused the error. We are allowed to collect unbilled fees for the prior years, but we are not required to collect them. The Committee was mixed on whether to collect prior year's fees and wanted to know the dollar amount involved before making a decision. When properties that had not been assessed at all were discovered in an earlier project, the prior years' fees were not billed. 2. How will we deal with delinquent payments or with property owners that have moved on? We will not be able to put these corrections on the property tax bill; we will have to generate invoices to the property owners. We can expect that some of the properties will have changed owners and some uses have changed. Since these properties are not connected to our sewers (they are connected to City sewers generally), and do not have discharge permits, we cannot shut them H:ldeptlagenda\Board Agenda Reports52004 Board Agenda Reports101045ttem 21.2.doc Revised: W0101 Page 3 off or discontinue service. We would need to use persuasion, collection agencies and small claims court to collect these fees. This could be a significant drain on staff time and would result in some businesses paying the fees while others did not. 3. Are there other methods of finding undercharged parcels? Are there other firms that challenge direct assessments that would be willing or able to work on the assessment side? How would we find them? What about contacting each of the firms that submit refund requests and offering them the same percentage to submit undercharges they discover? How about using existing or additional or limited-term staff to do the work? We know there is at least one such firm because we hired one in 1999 to do some special work for us. We have not discussed this work with that firm. We have the ability and the knowledge to do the work in house, but not the staff to do it quickly. The demands on staff would be lessened if the adjustments were made on a going-forward basis only. Staff estimates that it would take approximately 1,440 person days to review and visit the 28,800 non-residential parcels that have not been previously reviewed. There are approximately 240 person days in a year, so to complete the work in six months would require 12 limited-term employees. If each limited-term employee were paid $20 per hour, the additional staff costs would be approximately$230,000. 4. Is it worth the effort? This is the bottom-line question. We believe that there are businesses that are being undercharged. We believe this because we have found errors in the database and because there have been businesses that were over charged. Unfortunately, we cannot prepare and accurate estimate the value or magnitude of the undercharges. REG claims to have identified $3.5 million of undercharges. REG has not submitted the data necessary for staff to evaluate that claim, but we believe that amount includes charges for the four prior years. It may also include charges for adjustments previously made for fee reductions. Our goal is for every user to pay its fair share. Because our rates are determined by how much money we need to raise, if we are not collecting everything that is due us, we may be setting the rates too high in subsequent years. If the annual undercharges amount to $1 million, then the annual SFR user fee may be overstated by $1. There is also some intrinsic value to having a system that is as good as can be economically developed. The question is what is the proper cost? 5. What about changing the fee basis from use and building size to use and water use? A change like this is probably possible. We have the property use that is on the Assessor's database and we could even mail a survey to each non- residential user to determine the type of use on each developed parcel. Determining the water use is somewhat more difficult. First we would need to determine the total water purchased for each parcel. This would require some type of agreement with the water retailers. There would certainly be a cost for us to get the information from those agencies, but it could probably be worked out. In these days of computers, we should be able to get the data in a format H:ldeptlagenda\Board Agenda Reports12004 Board Agenda Repons1010411tem 21.2.doc Revised: MOM Page 4 that we could work with. The next step would be to determine how much of the purchased water gets discharged to the sewer. Some is generally used for landscape, some evaporates and some becomes product. The same survey that determined the property use could also ask for this information. A change like this would probably take some time to complete and would require the help of a consulting firm. The cost and the time required to develop such a program is not known. 6. What if we find any parcels that were overcharged? Options are to do nothing, to notify the property owner to verify the changes or to simply issue an unsolicited refund. The Committee agreed with staff that any overcharges that were discovered by staff or a consultant would be refunded. Use of a consultant would raise the issue of how that consultant would be compensated for refunds. 7. What do other agencies do? Staff contacted the City of Los Angeles, Sacramento and LA County Sanitation Districts (LACSD). Only LACSD has responded. They assess and collect their sewer user fee in a manner very similar to ours. They have approximately 1,000,000 parcels with 8-900,000 being residential, so they do not take any extra measures to find non-residential user undercharges. We have 530,000 total parcels with 475,500 residential parcels. Fees of the County Assessor, the County Auditor-Controller and the data processing service associated with the sewer service user fee program are budgeted within the collection system, or Revenue Area, operating budget. No budget appropriation was made for the proposed services. If the consultant's estimate of a minimum recovery of$3.5 million is correct, then that would be approximately $700,000 for each of the five eligible years. We know that rates have increased during this period and that the amounts for each year would not be equal, but would probably be back-weighted. Assume this for discussion purposes however. If we collect $3.5 million the first year and the cost is $2.5 million, we are $1 million to the good. Then in 2003-04 we will use the corrected database and collect another additional $700,000. Should the Directors decide to only go forward with the corrected database and not to collect the unbilled user fees for the previous 4 years, it will take longer to recover the consultant costs. In the base case example, the $2.5 million fee would be repaid in approximately four years. The immediate out-of-pocket costs can be paid from either budget savings, from current year revenues or from reserves. ALTERNATIVES 1. Authorize the consultant's work but do not bill for past undercharges. Wdept\agenda\Board Agenda ReporW2004 Board Agenda Reports10104Utem 21.2.doc Revised: 8120/01 Page 5 2. Authorize the consultant's work but wait until the amount or impact is known to decide about past undercharges. 3. Do not authorize the consultant's work and direct staff to improve the database in house over an extended time period. 4. Direct staff to conduct a formal RFP process, compare the results to the costs to complete the process in house and return to FAHR with a recommendation. 5. Direct staff to determine the feasibility of agreements with all or several firms that process refund requests to also process undercharge adjustments on a contingency basis. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposal received from Revenue Enhancement Group GGS H:1depAagenda\Board Agenda Repor1s12004 Board Agenda Repor1s10104t11em 21.2.doc Revised: 8120101 Page 6 4 REVENUE ENHANCEMENT GROUP PROPOSAL Identifying undercharged commercial parcels...making rates more fair. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)is presently undercharging hundreds of commercial parcels. Revenue Enhancement Group(REG),a successful Orange County based consulting firm,can identify these parcels and help to make OCSD assessment database more accurate and insure that all rate payers pay their fair share. Using paid databases,public information,Internet resources,site inspections and request letters,REG will create an assessment database to include accurate square footage and usage information. Conducting this intense six month research project will help the OCSD recover millions of dollars in back fees and increase firture revenues significantly. In addition to the research,REG will for no additional charge,and at the direction of the OCSD advance the process by notifying parcel owners,generating invoices and assisting in the collections process. The database will be prepared for ease of use within the OCSD. This will correct the problem of relying on the assessor's file which often times includes inaccurate parcel information and or missing information resulting in millions of dollars in lost revenue for OCSD. At the heart of this proposal is the issue of fairness. For too long residential rate payers have paid their fair share,while numerous business rate payers have underpaid. Likewise,commercial rate payer who are paying, often times thousands of dollars less than they are supposed to,have a significant unfair advantage over their competitors who pay the correct amount. EXAMPLE: REG has already identified approximately$3,600,000 of undercharges within the OCSD rate payers. This is based upon assessing parcel owner the current tax year and four years prior per OCSD and California statute. REG has reviewed only a very small portion of the larger square footage undercharged parcels. ACTION PLAN 1 Review all 29,608 commercial parcels to verify use code and square footage. Trained investigators will use a variety of research tools to update the assessment database. Some of these tools include: a. Property profile databases from Win2Data,Dataquick,and Costar Properties b. Internet(many commercial property owners have web sites featuring their properties with use and square footage information) REVENUE ENHANCEMENT GROUP PROPOSAL TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOVEMBER 2003 Page 1 of 3 a c. Site inspections d. Send letters to property owners to obtain the necessary parcel information r -REG will prepare these letters to property owners on OCSD letterhead (content approved by OCSD). Postage will be paid for by REG. 2. All information will be formatted in a database(created by REG)based on parcel number and will include the following information: Proper Profile a. Parcel number b. Use code currently charged c. Square footage currently charged d. District number e. Sanitation charges billed for current tax year and for each tax year for the past four years f Use code after investigation g. Square footage after investigation h. Corrected sanitation charges for current year and four years prior by year i. Source where the information was collected,such as assessor,parcel owner,property database or site inspection j. The database will show whether current year and each of the four years prior was correctly charged,overcharged or undercharged k. OCSD billed charges for the 2003-2004 tax year and four tax years prior If the parcel is undercharged the following will also be included: The property profile will also show the corrected use and square footage and the OCSD assessment that is correct for 2003-2004 tax year and the four prior tax years if applicable. The database will calculate the correct charges based on the new information and compare it to previous bills if any exist. The database will calculate the additional amount of OCSD charges to be billed to each parcel. And finally,the database will keep a running total of the dollar amount that OCSD has undercharged. If the parcel is over charged: The database will reflect if a parcel is being overcharged. 3. Once the database is complete,it will be delivered to OCSD in electronic format 4. REG will prepare invoices,letters and address envelopes to each parcel owner on behalf of OCSD at the time the undercharge is verified. All letters and invoices will be approved, signed and mailed by OCSD. 5 This proposal includes REG willingness to expand its call center operation to handle incoming calls from parcel owners with questions regarding their new REVENUE ENHANCEMENT GROUP PROPOSAL TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOVEMBER 2003 Page 2 of 3 invoices. While not a requirement of the agreement,REG offers this option at no v additional cost to OCSD. 6. REG would like to offer a monthly progress briefing to the appropriate committee or staff at the discretion of the OCSD. TIME LINE If beginning prior to January 30,2004,REG will have this project completed by August 1,2004. OCSD will receive a monthly report on the undercharged parcels so OCSD can make the change on the use or square footage and send the updated information to the assessor in order to have the 2004-2005 tax year billed sanitation charges be correct. Invoices and letters to parcel owners will be generated on a weekly basis as soon as the undercharge is verified by REG. Once a month a financial report will be generated and delivered to the OCSD. This monthly report will show the undercharged dollar amount invoiced for the past month and the running year to date total of all undercharges invoiced. CONTACT Robert Lockhart is president of REG and will be the contact person for the contract. REG is located at 600 S Main Street Suite 1100,Orange CA 92868. Telephone number 714-5434460,fax number 714-543-4604,email rlockharto evenh.com. BUDGET REG will be paid$2,500,000 plus 15%of additional undercharged billed assessments over$3,500,000. REG will receive payment of$1,000,000 when REG starts the project. Payment of$500,000 by April 15,2004. The balance of$1,000,000 will be paid when the database is completed and delivered to OCSD. The additional 15%will be paid by January 15,2005. For any additional commercial parcels above the current 28,608 currently being billed by OCSD,REG will charge a flat fee of$90 per parcel. The fee would be paid at the time REG delivers the completed database. Respectfully submitted by, Robert Lockhart President REVENUE ENHANCEMENT GROUP PROPOSAL TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOVEMBER 2003 Page 3 of 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 1/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number _ 22 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: FEES FOR PROPERTIES ANNEXING TO THE DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-21, adopting fees, procedures and policies concerning annexation of properties to the District and repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-03. SUMMARY The current Ordinance governing annexations was adopted in 1998 and needs to be updated. It contains different rates for each of the old Revenue Areas and it includes prior adjustments based upon cost of living changes. A new Ordinance has been prepared in accordance with the attached staff report. The proposed annexation fee includes two types of charges, based upon acreage. The first is a $1,235 charge for net current assets in order to place the annexing property on equal historical footing with existing properties. The second is a $3,000 charge that will generate interest income equivalent to the property tax allocation from existing properties. In addition to this total of $4,235 per acre, annexing properties will pay the appropriate capital facilities capacity charge (CFCC). PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The last Board action related to annexation fees was during the consolidation in July 1998. The current fees range from $3,908 to $5,830 per acre. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Staff estimates that there are approximately 8,250 acres within Orange County and adjacent to our service area boundaries. If all of these properties were to annex to the District, we would receive approximately $35 million. When the properties are developed they will also pay appropriate CFCCs, and when they are occupied and connected to the sewer they will pay annual user fees. The amount of CFCCs and user fees cannot be determined at this time as the ultimate use of the property is unknown. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) H:\depMgenda\Board Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Reports\0104\I1em 22.Ordinance 21.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please see attached staff report and draft ordinance ALTERNATIVES Alternatives are discussed in the staff report CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1 . Staff Report 2. Draft Ordinance H1depl�agenda\Board Agenda ReportsQ004 Board Agenda ReporW0104111em 22.0rdinance 21.doc Revised: 06104/03 Page 2 4OJN1( SAMIMp W V = `� � 9 ¢ C+ 4 vYYV� Tile ENV`Q�d December 10, 2003 STAFF REPORT Annexation Fees BACKGROUND Annexation fees are the fees paid by the owners of property outside of the District's service area that wish to now be inside the service area. Fees are required for two principal reasons. All properties that have been within the service area have contributed property taxes to the District. Prior to the passage of Proposition 13, the Districts levied separate property taxes for operations, capital improvements and debt service. Subsequently, a portion of the 1% basic levy has been allocated to the District. Properties that have been outside of the District have not paid, or had allocated, any of their property taxes to the District. Thus, these properties have not contributed to any of the facilities or other assets of the District. One of the objectives of an annexation fee is to place the annexing properties as closely as possible to the relative financial position they would have been in had the property always been within the District service area. This could be interpreted to mean that an annexing property should pay an amount equal the present value of the accumulated property taxes that would have been paid since 1954. Future property taxes are also an issue for annexing properties. Current law does not allow the agency that the properties are annexing into to automatically participate in the property tax allocation. A property tax exchange agreement must be negotiated with each of the agencies that had been receiving a share of the taxes. This means that each of them must agree to a lesser share of the taxes in order for the District to receive any. These agreements have proven to be difficult to impossible to negotiate. DISCUSSION There are three basic alternatives for calculating an annexation fee that put an annexing property in approximately the same financial position as other properties, depending on how that is defined. For the sake of simplicity, these alternatives can be called "net equity,""back taxes" and "net current assets." Each of these methods also requires payment of a connection fee or Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) before the property can use the District's sewerage system. The"net equity" method and variations on it are based upon the theory that the annexation property should buy into the current fiscal position of the District. This buy-in is based upon the most recent financial statements and is easily verified. The financial position can include upon the cost of fixed assets or the cost can be reduced by accumulated depreciation to reflect use of those assets. Whichever valuation of net equity is used, that value is divided by the total OCSD - P.O.Box 8127 - Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 - (714)962-241 1 Annexation Fees Page 2of3 �! December 10, 2003 number of acres in the service area to determine an annexation fee per acre. This method could provide the appearance of a double charge since the CFCC paid at the time of connection also includes a component for the value of the sewerage system and equipment. Of course properties that have always been within the service area must also pay the CFCC and those properties have always contributed somewhat to net equity. The "back taxes" method seems on the surface to put properties that annex into the same fiscal position as properties that have always been in the service area, but that have not connected to the system. To use this method the assessed value of the property for each year since 1954, the average property tax rate for each year prior to 1978 and property tax allocation factor for year must be known for each annexation. This information is not available at the District and is not expected to be available from the County Assessor's Office. User fees would be excluded from this calculation as those are fees for service which the annexing properties did not receive and should not have paid. The "net current assets" method omits the value of fixed assets and long-term liabilities from the calculation. The theory behind omitting these costs is that the CFCC that will be paid when the property connects to the system will include the proper charge for fixed assets, or capacity in the system. The remaining "net current assets"would basically be cash and inventories that will reduce future user fees. So far the discussion of the three alternative methods has focused only on the value or worth of past property tax payments or allocations. Future property tax allocations are also an issue. Although property values may rise because sewer service is available and although the property owner will pay the same 1% basic levy as other properties in the District, the District will not receive any property tax allocation. Property tax exchange agreement negotiations fail routinely because the District has the ability to levy a user fee while other"tax-supported" agencies do not. In fact, this very issue is at the heart of the formation of District 13 in 1985; the County refused to share any of their historical property tax allocation. The County actually has a policy not to share historical property taxes with new enterprise districts. There are two ways to provide for the future property taxes that will not be shared. One way is to include them in the sewer user fees. Because the average property tax allocation to the District is about 2.8% of the 1% basic levy, these foregone taxes are relatively minor and the impact on the average user fee may be considered to be relatively insignificant. For example, the District's 2003-04 property tax allocation will be approximately $150 per acre. The user fee impact of this method is quite small for an individual property annexation. There are approximately 8,250 acres within the County and adjacent to our service area that are not currently annexed. The largest of these are the Bolsa Chica, the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station and Orange Park Acres. If we assume the current average property tax of$156 per year per acre for each of these 8,250 acres, then the impact on the user fee would be about $1.40 for a single -family residence in order to generate the equivalent $1,287,000. Another solution is to collect from the owner of the annexing property an additional amount that would earn annual interest approximately equal to the property taxes that are lost. For example, the 2003-04 property tax allocation for the District is $44 million and the service area is approximately 282,000 acres. This means that the average property tax per acre is about$150 per year. Assuming an average annual interest rate of 5%, it would take a principal amount of $3,000 to generate $150 per year. This method would allow us to use our standard annexation Annexation Fees Page 3 of 3 December 10, 2003 fee as a basis for determining the in-lieu charges for providing service to areas outside the County that are served by contract. RECOMMENDATION Staff has considered the discussion above, along with the discussion of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge alternatives and Sewer Service User Fees, and the histories of each of these charges. We believe that the calculation of Annexation Fees and CFCCs must be coordinated to ensure that no properties pay twice for the same facilities, that all new properties to the District pay their fair share for the assets provided by older properties, that each new user of the sewer system, no matter when they became members of the District, pays its fair share of the cost of the facilities that they will use, and that all users pay their fair share of ongoing operations and maintenance expenses. Staff recommends that the Annexation Fee be made up of two components; a fee for net current assets and a fee to provide equivalent property tax allocations. The property's share of fixed assets will be paid through the CFCC, which is based upon the type of development and the resultant demands upon the sewerage system. Based upon the financial report for June 30, 2003, and the 2003-04 budget, these two parts would be $1,235 and $3,000 for a total of$4,235 per acre. The fee could be revisited each year and a new Ordinance adopted by the Board, or it could be revisited whenever the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is reconsidered. The current annexation fees range from $3,908 to $5,830 per acre but they are not firmly anchored in the balance sheet, the income statement or the budget. GGS G:1wp.dtalfin\2101CRANEIFAHRIFAHR2003\DEC1Staff Report-annexation fees 121003.doc ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING FEES, PROCEDURES, AND POLICIES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-03 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ("District") has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-03, adopting fees, procedures, and policies concerning annexations of territory to the District, which Ordinance is presently in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, for purposes of continued efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations, preservation of the public health and safety, and in order to continue the provision of wastewater collection, treatment and disposal services, it is the intent, by adoption of this Ordinance, to continue said procedures and policies in effect, without interruption; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District has received a management report, including financial needs of the District, and wishes to reaffirm the policy of imposing annexation fees when new territory is annexed to the District, and to adopt findings supporting the amount of the fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby FIND: A. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities, entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan — 1989", hereinafter referred to as the"Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, was prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, setting forth and identifying the required future development of District facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the individual service areas of each of the nine Predecessor Districts; and B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan were made available to the public, both prior to and subsequent to the adoption of the Master Plan, and were subject to noticed pubic hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of the California Constitution and Government Code Section 66016, and other provisions of law; and C. That the District, in 1997, as part of its maintenance and updating of its Master Plan, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain access to the system. These comprehensive planning, engineering, and financial studies led to the development of an updated Comprehensive Master Plan of Capital Facilities, which was approved and WS&S—TLW:pj:01/20/04:179509-Redline 1 i adopted by OCSD Resolution No. 99-21 of the Board of Directors on October 27, 1999; and D. That the properties upon which the fees established by this Ordinance are levied, will, subsequent to payment of an additional Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, allow the owners to discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities; that the costs of operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and that said costs will exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues derived from said property; and E. That the District will not receive any tax exchange from said annexed properties because of an agreement with the County of Orange under which there is no tax exchange for newly-annexed property; and F. That the fees establoshed he but Ret a G9AditieR,-9f F. That the Annexation fees established here, are an incident but not a condition of development, payable only on request to receive service by the property owner for the benefit of those persons on the property that use the service. The fees are not an incident of property ownership, nor are they a property-related service having a direct relationship to property ownership. Accordingly, the provisions of California Constitution Article XRID are not applicable. G. That the annexation fees imposed by authority of this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide access to the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in California Government Code Section 66013; and H. That the fees established by this Ordinance will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The collection of these annexation fees will not result in any specific project, and will not result in a direct physical change in the environment; and I. That the fees adopted by this Ordinance are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each property that is annexing, and the service and facilities provided to each annexed property by the District, a portion of which is necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes to the State General Fund as a result of State legislative action on September 2, 1992, and in subsequent years; and J. That all fees and charges established herein have been approved by the District's Board of Directors at a noticed public meeting, all in accordance with applicable provisions of law; and K. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to WS&S—TLW:pj:01/20/04:179509-Redline 2 D the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: That the purpose of this Ordinance is to establish fees required to be paid by property owners for the annexation of property to the District. Said fees are in lieu of property taxes not allocated to the District while the property was outside of the District, and in lieu of future property tax allocations through a Tax Exchange Agreement. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance may be used for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction for said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 2: That the proponents of any application for annexation of any territory to the District are requesting that the annexed property become a part of the District's jurisdiction, and that by doing so, they become entitled to receive the benefits of having access to the use of the extensive capital facilities system and to receive the District's service, and shall, as a condition to securing approval of the Board of Directors of the District to such annexation, agree to and comply with the following requirements: A. Payment of all administrative costs incurred by the District in processing the annexation. B. Payment of annexation acreage fees, as follows: Beginning defy 1,1998 January 1. 2004, the sum to be paid for annexation of territory to the District for which no tax exchange is negotiated between all affected agencies is hereby fixed: Reremue.4rPA "nT N/A Re..eRwe Araa Ale '2 , peVeR a Area Ne 6 N/A oeyeru,e Area Ne 7- $3,893.00 peFaGFe $5,839-99-pef aGFe VA NA Consolidated Revenue Area Nos. 1-13 $4,235/acre Revenue Area No. 14 N/A C. The annexed territory shall be subject to the terms and conditions of all Ordinances and Resolutions pertaining to fees for connection to the District's facilities and use of said facilities, including but not limited to, industrial discharge permit fees, capital facilities capacity charges, and sewer service user fees. D. The annexed territory shall be annexed into an appropriate local sewering agency, or obtain the written approval of the designated local sewering WSBS—TLW:pj:01/20/04:179509-Redline 3 4 agency, such as a city, for the purpose of obtaining access to and use of the local sewer system, including pumping stations and force mains, which connects to the District's facilities and system. E. The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retirement of the existing and future bonds of the District, and all other applicable ad valorem taxes of the District. Section 3: The General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to establish procedures and fees for processing annexation of territory to the District. Said procedures may include provisions for collection by the District of fees charged by other local and state agencies involved in the annexation process for submittal to said agencies by the District on behalf of the annexation proponent. The District's Staff is hereby directed to provide the proponents of any proposed annexation a copy of procedures and fee schedules established pursuant to the authority of this Section. Section 4: That the Staff be directed to transmit to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission a certified copy of this Ordinance. Section 5: If any of the provisions of this Ordinance, or the application to any persons or circumstance are held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of this Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section 6: That the provisions of this Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption and shall apply to all annexations to the District on or after said date. Section 7: That Ordinance No. OCSD-03 is hereby repealed. Section 8: That the Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a regular meeting held Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Secretary, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL WSBS—TLW:pj:01120/04:179509-Redline 4 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: January 8, 2004 RE: Ordinance No. OCSD-21 re Annexation Fees Ordinance No. OCSD-22 re Capital Facilities Capacity Charges The above-referenced Ordinances each provide for certain increases in the existing fees of the District, imposed when: a) a property located outside of the District's boundaries requests to annex to the District and to receive service; or b) a building or structure requests connection to the District's system (or expands an existing structure). The Ordinances on the Agenda are set for their required second reading. They have been noticed for public meetings, as required by California Government Code Section 66016(a). The notices were given by posting on the District's Web site, in the Orange County Register, and in the main administrative office building lobby. No direct mailing to property owners is required. Each of the fees has been proposed at an amount that does not exceed the cost of providing the service. Said costs have been studied and calculated by the Engineering and Finance Departments of the District. The requirements of Proposition 218, including the procedural notices, are not applicable to any of the two proposed Ordinances. Each of the fees relates solely to development or to actual provision of a service commodity (treatment and disposal) at the request of the property owner and are not imposed as an incident of ownership of property. Authority: Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership v. Orange County Sanitation District, Court of Appeal Case N . G03024 (December 5, 2003). XFHOMAS L. WOODRUFF TLW:pj GENERAL COUNSEL cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed Ms. P. Kyle /179507/1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: January 8, 2004 RE: Ordinance No. OCSD-21 re Annexation Fees Ordinance No. OCSD-22 re Capital Facilities Capacity Charges At the Regular Board Meeting of December 17, 2003, the proposed Ordinances amending Annexation Fees and Capital Facilities Capacity Charges were presented in full to the Directors. The Board, by motion, approved the introduction and first reading (of two) of each Ordinance. Ordinance No. 22 on this Agenda is being submitted with only those pages containing amendments to the existing rates and charges. They are shown in "redline" form to note both the existing rates and the new rates. The full Ordinance will be available at the meeting and has been made available to the public. If a Director wishes to receive another full copy of the Ordinance, please call the Board Secretary, who will mail one to you before the meeting. L"X ja X':��oc��- - HOMAS L. WOODRUFF / GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:pj cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed Ms. P. Kyle LL BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date �28�04 f Dir. AGENDA REPORT item Number item Number 23 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES (CONNECTION FEES) MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES, SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AND PERMIT USER CHARGES FOR 2003-04 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-22, reaffirming sanitary sewer service charges; adopting capital facilities capacity charges; adopting miscellaneous charges and fees relating to industrial discharger, source control permittees and wastehaulers; and repealing Ordinance No OCSD-20. (Must be approved by a 2/3 vote of the entire Board of Directors.) SUMMARY The proposed Ordinance includes changes only to the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges (CFCC) and two additions to the schedule of non-compliance fees for permit users. CFCCs, or connection fees, are one-time fees collected in order to cover the costs of providing sewerage facilities to serve a property. Today, connection fees are collected for the District by member cities and sanitary districts when building permits are issued. As a part of the Sewer User Fee discussion in May, staff proposed increases in the CFCC for 2003-04. The staff proposal was based upon the methodology adopted subsequent to the Rate Advisory Committee work and reflected the recently completed Validated Capital Improvement Program. The Directors deferred any action on increased rates as they wanted to concentrate their focus on the Sewer User Fees. This report is the final in a series that set the stage for a CFCC rate change. Previous reports provided the background that is required to understand the existing CFCC program, addressed the concerns that the Directors raised and discussed the theory of some of the methods for calculating a CFCC and their impacts. The proposed CFCC for the benchmark 3-bedroom, single-family residence is proposed to increase from $1 ,820 to $2,890 to pay for capacity needed for future growth. Other CFCCs and the Supplemental CFCC charged some permit users will also increase. Additionally, the staff is recommending a small change to the fees for significant users with permits from our Source Control Division. A new fee is recommended to be levied against a firm that is considered to be "significantly non-compliant" (SNC) in order to H.\depAagenda\Board Agenda ReporW2004 Board Agenda Reports\0104\I1em 23.Ordinance 22.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 1 recover District's costs associated with obtaining data and publishing the required notice. These fees are proposed to be $165 and $260. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Capital Facilities Capacity Charges of $10.2 million were collected in 2002-03; approximately 6% of the District's revenue. Future amounts depend on the rates and the rate of new development. Had the proposed rate schedule been in effect for 2002-03, the total CFCCs would have been approximately $16.2 million. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1 . Base CFCCs are determined by type of development and are calculated per 1 ,000 square feet of building for non-residential development and per unit for residential development. 2. Three categories of Commercial connection fees have been developed: low demand, average demand and high demand. 3. Significant Industrial Users (Class I Permit Users) are charged demand-based connection fees as a part of their ongoing annual use charges, in addition to the one-time, up-front charge. These fees will include an interest component. 4. Residential fees are tiered based upon number of bedrooms for single-family residential (SFR) and multi-family residential (MFR) development, as number of bedrooms is the best available indicator of number of residents. 5. Connection fees are collected by local sewering agencies at the time the building permit is issued, and they retain 5% of the fee. 6. Credit for demolished structures is granted as if fees for those structures had been paid under the current Ordinance. 7. Connection fees are charged for local agency facilities such as schools, city halls and libraries, as well as for state and federal facilities. ALTERNATIVES See enclosed Staff Report. Wdept\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Reports\0104\I1em 2l0rdinance 22.doc Revised B20198 Pace 2 B CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. CFCC Staff Report 2. Important Parameters Affecting CFCCs, Revised 3. Current Capital Facilities Capacity Charges 4. Significantly Non-Compliant User Staff report GGS HAdepMgenda%Board Agenda ReportM2004 Board Agenda Reports10104%liem 23.Ordinance 22.doc Revised: 8/OM Page 3 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION J MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: January 8, 2004 RE: Ordinance No. OCSD-21 re Annexation Fees Ordinance No. OCSD-22 re Capital Facilities Capacity Charges At the Regular Board Meeting of December 17, 2003, the proposed Ordinances amending Annexation Fees and Capital Facilities Capacity Charges were presented in full to the Directors. The Board, by motion, approved the introduction and first reading (of two) of each Ordinance. Ordinance No. 22 on this Agenda is being submitted with only those pages containing amendments to the existing rates and charges. They are shown in "redline" form to note both the existing rates and the new rates. The full Ordinance will be available at the meeting and has been made available to the public. If a Director wishes to receive another full copy of the Ordinance, please call the Board Secretary, who will mail one to you before the meeting. )HiOLMASLL-. WCiODRUFF / GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:pj cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed Ms. P. Kyle LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: January 8, 2004 RE: Ordinance No. OCSD-21 re Annexation Fees Ordinance No. OCSD-22 re Capital Facilities Capacity Charges The above-referenced Ordinances each provide for certain increases in the existing fees of the District, imposed when: a) a property located outside of the District's boundaries requests to annex to the District and to receive service; or b) a building or structure requests connection to the District's system (or expands an existing structure). The Ordinances on the Agenda are set for their required second reading. They have been noticed for public meetings, as required by California Government Code Section 66016(a). The notices were given by posting on the District's Web site, in the Orange County Register, and in the main administrative office building lobby. No direct mailing to property owners is required. Each of the fees has been proposed at an amount that does not exceed the cost of providing the service. Said costs have been studied and calculated by the Engineering and Finance Departments of the District. The requirements of Proposition 218, including the procedural notices, are not applicable to any of the two proposed Ordinances. Each of the fees relates solely to development or to actual provision of a service commodity (treatment and disposal) at the request of the property owner and are not imposed as an incident of ownership of property. Authority: Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership v. Orange County Sanitation District, Court of Appeal Case N . G03024 (December 5, 2003). i HOMAS L. WOODRUFF TLW:pj GENERAL COUNSEL cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed Ms. P. Kyle \179507\1 PASSED AND ADOPTED by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held CHAIR, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ATTEST: SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT GENERAL COUNSEL #179525:01120/04-Redline 30 ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01. Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be in addition to the provisions of District Ordinance No. OCSD- 01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District's Sewage Facilities, including provisions for payment of charges or fees related thereto; District Ordinance No. OCSD-03, as amended, Establishing Fees Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and any other District Ordinances and Resolutions not in conflict herewith. Section 5.02. Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax-exempt organizations, except as expressly provided herein. The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does further hereby ORDAIN: Section II. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section III. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect Section IV. Repeal. Ordinance No. OCSD-20 is hereby repealed. Section V. Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. 11 11 11 #179525:01/20104-Redline 29 TABLE H WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE Wastehauler Fees Charges Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.035/gallon of within Orange County truck capacity Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.11/gallon of outside Orange County truck capacity #179525:01/20104-Redline 28 TABLE G CLASS I AND CLASS II PERMITTEES AND SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITTEES CHARGES FOR USE Class 1 and II Permit User FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Flow(") $316.38 $368.58 $429.40 $500.25 $582.79 B.O.D. (**) $216.13 $248.55 $285.83 $328.71 $378.01 S.S. (`..) $207.35 $238.45 $274.22 $315.35 $362.66 Domestic Equivalent $100.00 $115.00 $132.00 $153.00 $175.00 Special Purpose Discharge Permit FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Flow(') $316.38 $368.58 $429.40 $500.25 $582.79 B.O.D. ('*) $216.13 $248.55 $285.83 $328.71 $378.01 S.S. (***) $207.35 $238.45 $274.22 $315.35 $362.66 Domestic Equivalent $100.00 $115.00 $132.00 $153.00 $175.00 (') Flow Per million gallons of Flow (*`) B.O.D. Per thousand pounds of Biochemical Oxygen Demand ('*'") S.S. Per thousand pounds of Suspended Solids All properties located within Revenue Area No. 14 pay no annual service fees. District costs relating to providing service to these properties are billed by OCSD directly to the Irvine Ranch Water District, the local agency providing the local sewer service. #179525:01/20/04-Redline 27 New rates and charges are in bold] TABLE F (CONTINUED) INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge 612 $200.00 624 $355.00 625 $661.00 Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $ 21.00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) $ 44.00 BOD and Suspended Solids (SS) Analysis $ 67.00 Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 44.00 Conductivity $ 15.00 Cyanide (Amenable) $ 70.00 Dissolved Mineral Solids $ 15.00 Gamma Radiation Determination $115.00 Gross Alpha and Beta Determination $ 50.00 Tritium Determination $ 50.00 Oil & Grease (Hexane Soluble Matter) $ 74.00 Oil & Grease (Mineral Partition) $ 74.00 Total Organic Nitrogen $ 48.00 pH $ 8.00 Fluoride $ 51.00 Suspended Solids (Total) $ 23.00 Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) $ 44.00 Total Dissolved Solids $ 14.00 Total Sulfides $ 29.00 SELF-MONITORING AND DATA REPORTING NON-COMPLIANCE Cost of Processing and Issuing Significant Non-Compliance Notification $165.00 Cost of Processin_g Annual SNC and Publication $260.00 #179525:01/20/04-Redline 26 TABLE F INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Minor Violation $225.00/event Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Major Violation $500.00/event Cost of Analysis Charge Heavy Metals: $35.00/each - Aluminum - Antimony - Arsenic - Cadmium - Chromium - Copper - Gold - Lead - Molybdenum - Nickel - Palladrum - Platinum - Selenium - Silver - Thallium -Zinc Mercury $78.00 601/602 $152.00 604 $223.00 606 $254.00 608 $523.00 610 $73.00 #179525:01/20/04-Redline 25 TABLE E ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITTEES Permit Fees Charges A. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit $335.00/year B. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit $70.00/year C. Special Purpose Discharge Permit $250.00/year - One-Time Application $975.00/permit - Nonrefundable Deposit for First One Million Gallons — New Permit Only $316.38 D. Wastehauler Discharge Permit $75.00/year Wastehauler Fees Charges F. Permit Decal Initial Issue $25.00 G. Permit Decal Replacement $50.00 H. Entry Card Initial Issue $50.00 I. Entry Card Replacement $100.00 J. After Hours Discharge — Prearranged $85.00/event K. After Hours Discharge — Emergency $100.00/event Administrative/Processing Fees Charges L. District's Collection of Tax Data $100.00/permit M. District's Collection of Water Consumption Data $'100.00/permit N. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400/appeal #179525:01/20104-Redline 24 Section 4.02. Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees. Administrative fees and charges relating to permittees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table E, below. Section 4.03. Source Control Non-Compliance Fees. Source control non-compliance fees are hereby established for dischargers' non- compliance sampling and for self-monitoring and data reporting non-compliance, in the sum or sums as set forth in Table F, below. Section 4.04. Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 305.5 and 305.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, charges for use are hereby established for Special Purpose Discharge Permittees, as set forth in Table G, below Section 4.05. Class I and Class II Permittees — Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 302.3, 302.6, 303.3 and 303.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for Class I and Class II Permittees as set forth in Table G, below. Section 4.06. Wastehauler Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 306.3 and 306.7 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for wastehaulers as set forth in Table H, below. Section 4.07. Administrative Appeals. A. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any decision, action, or determination by the District may, within forty-five (45) days of the date of mailing by the District of the initial invoice for fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance, request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees. Following review of such a request, the District shall notify the user, permit applicant, or permittee by certified mail of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. B. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by the District's decision on the reconsideration request, may file an appeal in accordance with Sections 617 and 619 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. #179525:01/20/04-Redline 23 new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C for the prior category of use. Section 3.13. Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off- Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner, shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due, provided the original Agreement is still in force. The Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3.06 through 3.10 hereinabove, established for property connecting to said facilities. Section 3.14. No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid for the connection of a specific building or structure on a parcel of property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any other parcel of property. Section 3.15. Baseline Transferability. The baseline of allowed discharge of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such previously existing baseline be provided to another SCI U concurrently or subsequently occupying the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in accordance with Section 3.08 above. ARTICLE IV MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to recover those costs incurred by the District (i) on account of industrial dischargers' and wastehaulers' use of the District's facilities; (ii) when administering the District's Source Control Program; and (iii) when performing non-compliance sampling of industrial wastewater dischargers who have violated the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations or the terms and conditions of the discharger's permit. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used to defray the costs incurred by the District (i) on account of such use of the District's facilities; and (ii) in performing these tasks. #179525:01120/04-Redline 22 of either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per day, whichever is lesser, over its established baseline authorization. B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in the following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in Section 3.10A above: TABLE D SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Daily Charge Flow Gallons Per Day $9.90957 $0.001001 BOD Pounds Per Day $0.1446.1 0.289100 SS Pounds Per Day $9.16025 $0.187150 C. All Existing SPDs connected and discharging to the sewer shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon occurrence of an increase of discharge flow over 25,000 gpd. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be $8.09957 $0.001001 per gallon per day of discharge for each gallon above 25,000 gpd. D. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the User's baseline or 25,000 gpd for SPDs. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for a year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District. Section 3.11. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C that would be for the prior category of use which was terminated and removed. Section 3.12. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the #179525:01/20/04-Redline 21 G. Each Existing SPD shall have a baseline of 25,000 gpd, 150 pounds per day of BOD and 150 pounds of SS. The Existing SPD shall be authorized to discharge flow up to 25,000 gpd without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. H. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed by Sections 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 below, shall be payable commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance. I. Within two (2) years from the date of the District's written notice to the existing SCIU of its baseline amounts, the existing SCIU, as described in Section 3.07C, shall have a right to appeal the District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the General Manager, or his designated representative, who shall have discretion, based upon extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager. The decision of the General Manager shall be final. Section 3.08. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial — Industrial Users. In addition to the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table C, for commercial — industrial use category properties, all New SCIU's shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound of BOD, or SS, exceeding the base use discharge maximums, in the amount shown in Table D. Section 3.09. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Purpose Dischargers. All New SPDs shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge of$0.00957 $0.001001 per gallon per day for each gallon of flow exceeding 25,000 gallons per day. Upon issue of permission to discharge, SPD with discharges above 25,000 gpd shall pay a nonrefundable Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, prior to discharge, for one million gallons above 25,000 gpd. The deposit will be credited by the District against future Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges. Section 3.10. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischargers. A. All Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users connected to and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either(i) an increase of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 25% per day over its established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or (ii) an increase #179525:01/20/04-Redline 20 Section 3.07. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial — Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischargers — Definitions. A. A Significant Commercial — Industrial User ("SCIU") is any person or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but excluding domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") greater than 150 pounds per day, or Suspended Solids ("SS") greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Article 3, due to having federally or District regulated or significant discharges. B. A special purpose discharger ("SPD") is any person or entity who discharges to the sewer system wastewater or process flow in an amount greater than 25,000 gpd (excluding domestic, industrial or commercial) and who is required to obtain a Special Purpose Discharge Permit as prescribed in Section 305 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01 or its successor. C. An Existing SCIU or SPD is any SCIU or SPD connected and discharging to the District's system prior to January 1, 2000. D. A New SCIU or SPD is any user who connects and discharges to the District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or after January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in Subparagraphs 3.07A and B above, but, subsequent to January 1, 2000, increases flow, or BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU or SPD. E. The maximum discharge allowed to a user, for which a base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Table C, above, is 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base use"). Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this Subsection 3.07E shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 3.08 and 3.09 hereof. F. Each Existing SCIU shall have a baseline of allowed discharge of flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of January 1, 2000. The baseline shall be based upon the discharge for Fiscal Year 1998-99, or upon such other discharge data which the District determines is representative of the user's actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who are deemed to be SCIU's solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, pursuant to Section 3.07A above, shall have a minimum baseline established as follows: Flow— 25,000 gallons per day; BOD — 150 pounds per day; and SS — 150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to discharge flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. #179525:01/20/04-Redline 19 New rates and charges are in bold] TABLE C CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial — Industrial Per 1,000 square feet' Low Demand' Per 1,000 square feet $119.99 170.001 Average Demand' Per 1,000 square feet $676:9A 050.00' High Demand' Per 1,000 square feet $1,688.00 $2,490.00' Single Family Residential SFR * % of Base Base Charge 5+ Bedrooms (Per Unit) 1.39 $2 538 AA 4 020.00 4 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 1.19 $2,16 3 440.00 3 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 1.00(Base) $1,820:-00$2,890.00 2 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 0.81 $1,47 $2,340.00 1 Bedroom (Per Unit) 0.62 V,:13A 88 1 790.00 Multi-Family Residential (MFR) * % of Base Base Charge 4+ Bedrooms (Per Unit) 1.08 $4,965:99 $3.120.00 3 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 0.89 $4,62A A8 2 570.00 2 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 0.70 $4,27 S9 2 020.00 1 Bedroom (Per Unit) 0.50 $ Qi $1,450.00 Studio (Per Unit) 0.32 $--58 920.00 Supplemental CFCC for Permit Users, includes 5% cost of funds. Flow, per million gallons per $0.001001 BOD, per 1,000 pounds per da $0.289100 SS, per 1,000 pounds per day $0.187150 'Provided the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be $$1,928 99 2 890.00; and all calculations shall be on a 1,000 sq.ft.,or portion thereof,Oasis. A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file in the Office of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building Department of each City within the District. 2Low Demand connections are the following categories of Users: Nurseries;Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches;Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards;and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. 3High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundries; Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants; Food Processing Facilities; Textile Manufacturers;and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. 4All other connections are Average demand users. *SFR— The rates for each size of SFR and MFR are established with a 3-bedroom SFR havin_a a base of 1.0, and all others are a relative percentage higher or lower than 1 0 depending on size of unit,as noted. #179525:01120/04-Redline 18 Section 3.05. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment. A. Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District., or if none, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. B. Upon application of any property owner seeking to connect to the District's system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property. Section 3.06. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts. Every person or entity connecting any new or expanded building or structure to the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the applicable category of use set forth on Table C, below. #179525:01/20/04-Redline 17 California, a county, city, district, school district, local or regional public authority, or any other political entity, subdivision or public corporation of the State. F. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as provided for in Sections 3.07, 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 of this Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly or annual basis, as determined by the District. Said charge is required to be paid by dischargers that exceed the maximum quantity of flow or constituents (BOD or SS) allowed as a base use for which the CFCC is paid. Section 3.03. Connection Permits: Required. A. Connection permits are required of each and every dwelling unit, and each commercial or industrial building, and structure connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to the District's facilities. Multiple detached structures on a single parcel of property shall each be required to obtain a connection permit. B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit under Sections 305 —305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01, or as amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit, as authorized above, may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. There will be a non-discriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained. Section 3.04. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No application for a permit for a connection of a structure to a District sewerage facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant, except as provided for discharges under a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said property. #179525:01/20104-Redline 16 ARTICLE III CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Section 3.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to impose Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly- connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 3.02. Definitions. A. "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing, planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair. B. "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non- discriminatory charge imposed at the time a building or structure is newly connected to the District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. This charge does not apply to temporary facilities or operations that are regulated under the provisions of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. C. "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to physically connect a property to the District's system, including but not limited to, installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines, and appurtenances to make the connection and which fee does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and overhead for the installation of those facilities. D. "Non-discriminatory" means that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non- public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the proportionate share of use of those facilities. E. "Public agency" means the United States or any of its agencies, the State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of #179525:01/20/04-Redline 15 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 0 Conversion-C/1, Rural PC 100% 2 One Residence 100% 4 Miscellaneous Improvement 100% 85 Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant 100% 103 Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage 100% 104 Food Processing Plant 100% 105 Cold Storage Plant 100% 106 Factory 100% 119 Public Utility 100% 120 Water Mutual or Company 100% 888 Conversion-Composite Prop. 100% 32 Cemetery& Related Buildings 101% 38 Funeral Home 101% 60 Nursing Home 102% 61 Convalescent Hospitals 102% 62 Converted Res. Used as Nursing 102% 28 Bowling Alleys 112% 92 Skating Rinks 112% 50 Single Medical Bldgs. to 3 Stories 124% 51 Small Medical Center 124% 52 Medical Center Complex 124% 53 High Rise Medical 124% 54 Converted Residence to Medical 124% 89 Average Flow Shopping Center 139% 20 Amusement Parks 144% 35 Entertainment Center 144% 73 Recreation 144% 30 Coin Operated Car Wash 151% 47 Supermarket 151% 48 Convenience Market 151% 90 High Flow Shopping Center 226% 76 Restaurant—Take Out 300% 77 Restaurant— Coffee Shop 600% 78 Restaurant— Dinner House 600% 79 Restaurant—Conversion from SF 600% 29 Conventional Car Wash 796% NOTE: Multiply the Table A Single Family Residential Rate by the percentage figure above in order to determine the rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. #179525:01/20104-Redline 14 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 84 Marine Service Station 41% 86 Combin.-Service Station/Convenience 41% 65 Single Office Bldgs. to 3 Stories 41% 66 Small Office Center 41% 67 Office Complex 41% 69 Converted Residence to Office 41% 7 Mobile Home 50% 55 Mobile Home Park 50% 107 Light Industrial —Single Tenant 50% 108 Light Industrial —Multi Tenant 50% 109 Research and Development 50% 114 Industrial Park 50% 37 Fraternal Buildings 51% 101 Unattached Theater 51% 26 Airport and Related Buildings 53% 45 Marinas 53% 88 Low Flow Shopping Center 53% 3 Two or More Residences 70% 10 Duplex Only 70% 11 Triplex Only 70% 12 04-Units Only 70% 13 5 to 16 Units 70% 14 17 to 25 Units 70% 15 26 to 40 Units Only 70% 16 41-99 Units Only 70% 17 100 or More Units 70% 18 Developed with a Mix of Forms 70% 63 Low Rise Retirement Building 70% 64 High Rise Retirement Building 70% 81 Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care 82% 82 Private Schools 82% 98 Store with Offices or Living Quarter 82% 99 Store with Office Upstairs 82% 118 Governmental Use Vacant/Develop. 82% 19 SFR with 1or 2 rental units 85% 34 Dormitory 97% 42 Hospital 97% 43 Hotel 97% 56 Motels and Motor Hotels 97% #179525:01/20/04-Redline 13 TABLE B ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1.000 SF or Unit 1 Vacant Land Parcel 0% 5 Common Area Parcel 0% 6 "Hold" Parcel 0% 8 Equivalent to Vacant 0% 121 Parcel of Minimal or No Value 0% 122 Subsurface Parcels 0% 124 Oil/Mineral Rights 0% 125 Mineral Rights Equipment 0% 126 Vacant Comm. Area-IMP Alloc. 0% 201 Homeowners Exemption AddT 0% 666 Unassigned Vacant 0% 777 Septic Tank Property 0% 112 Steel Building 7% 113 Mini-Warehouse 7% 58 Nurseries (Plants) 10% 100 Drive-In Theater 10% 44 Lumber/Constr. Material Yard 17% 71 Parking Garage 17% 72 Paved Parking Lot 17% 110 Warehouse— Single Tenant 17% 111 Warehouse— Multi Tenant 17% 115 Recreational Vehicle Storage 17% 116 Truck Terminal 17% 33 Church Buildings 20% 94 Department Store 23% 95 Discount Store 23% 96 Unattached Single Store 23% 97 Strip Store 23% 74 Recreational Vehicle Park 27% 36 Financial Buildings 27% 40 Health Club 29% 68 High Rise Office 30% 21 Automobile Dealership 41% 22 Auto Repair Shop 41% 23 Automotive Service 41% 24 Used Car Lot 41% 39 Golf Course 41% 57 Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building 41% 83 Automotive Service Station 41% #179525:01120/04-Redline 12 B. In the event District determines that, due to billing or payment error, or to inequity in the amount billed, a property owner has underpaid annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges payable to District, District, within four (4) years after the date of mailing of the tax bill, may: (1) collect the amount of any deficiency directly on the County Tax Roll; (2) off-set the amount of any deficiency against any amounts that District determines is owing, by District, to the property owner, as a rebate or refund under this Ordinance; or (3) submit, directly to the property owner, a bill for the amount of any deficiency, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the invoice date and which, if not paid, shall become a lien on said property. Section 2.06. Credit for Industrial Permittees. A credit shall be allowed to all dischargers permitted pursuant to Article 3 of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, in an amount equal to the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge established by Section 2.02 of this Ordinance, in the same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Sections 302.6(B), and 303.6(B) of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. TABLE A ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE USER FEES RESIDENTIAL USERS FISCAL YEAR 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 SFR $100.00 $115.00 $132.00 $153.00 $175.00 MFR $ 70.00 $ 80.50 $ 92.40 $107.10 $122.50 SFR = SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MFR = MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL All properties located within Revenue Area No. 14 pay no annual service fees. District costs relating to providing service to these properties are billed by OCSD directly to the Irvine Ranch Water District, the local agency providing the local sewer service. #179525:01/20/04-Redline 11 (1) The owner's parcel of property is not connected to the District's system; or (2) The property has not been classified in the proper land use category; or (3) A clerical error has been made. D. Limitations Period. Applications for rebates and refunds shall be deemed to be governed by the provisions of California Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 5096 and 5097, allowing for refunds for a period of four (4) years from the date of payment of the second installment of the bill claimed to be either inequitable or incorrect. E. Determination. All applications for rebates or refunds of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge will be determined by the General Manager of the District, or his designee, who, based on the submitted proof, may grant a full or partial rebate or refund. F. Administrative Fee. At the time of filing the application for rebate or refund, the property owner shall pay District an administrative fee for the processing of such application. The amount of the fee shall be equal to the total of all fees and charges imposed on the District by any other public entity, such as the Orange County Tax Collector, the Orange County Auditor, or the Orange County Recorder, in connection with the rebate or refund. Section 2.04. Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance shall be effective as of July 1 of each year, as set forth in Tables A and B, attached hereto, for the District's fiscal year, and shall remain in effect until such time as the rates adopted herein are changed by District Ordinance. There shall be no proration of such charges in any fiscal year. Section 2.05. Method of Collection. A. Pursuant to the authority granted by California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, and except as otherwise provided in Subparagraph 2.0513 below, all sanitary sewer service charges established herein shall be collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with, and not separately from, its general taxes. The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to make said collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements between the County of Orange and the District. #179525:01/20/04-Redline 10 classification is multiplied by the applicable single family residential rate shown in Table A, to arrive at the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. Section 2.03. A. Exemptions. It is the intent of the District that the legal owner(s) of parcels of real property, otherwise subject to the levy and payment of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, as prescribed herein, be relieved, in whole or in part, from the payment of said charges, in certain circumstances and under conditions prescribed herein, and be entitled to either a rebate or a refund with respect to charges paid, as more specifically set forth in Subparagraphs 2.036 and 2.03C below, provided an inequity is established or a billing error is proven, as specified in Subparagraphs B or C. B. Application for Rebate. Any property owner may apply to the District for a rebate of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that an unfair valuation of the property has been made by the District. An applicant for a rebate must establish, by proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that an inequity exists between the amount of the charge paid and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system, resulting in an unfair valuation. Satisfactory proof shall establish that either: (1) The principal water use is agricultural or horticultural; or (2) The property is devoted to any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. Satisfactory proof shall include, but not be limited to, documentation showing actual water usage for each billing cycle during the entire period for which the rebate is sought. The amount of any rebate shall not reduce the charge payable by any property owner, whose property is connected to the District's system, to less than the single family residential charge shown on the applicable Table attached hereto. C. Application for Refund. Any property owner may apply to the District for a refund of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that the amount paid was pursuant to an error in the amount billed or the amount paid. The applicant for a refund must submit proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that a billing error has been made by the District, or the County Tax Collector. Such proof shall include, but not be limited to, proof that: #179525:01/20/04-Redline 9 administration and implementation of permit and fee processing, non-compliance sampling, and related services associated with the District's Source Control Program. Y. That all fees and charges established herein have been approved by the District's Board of Directors at a noticed public meeting, all in accordance with applicable provisions of law. Z. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). AA. That each of the Findings set forth in previous Ordinances Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSD-11, OCSD-13, OCSD-15, OCSD-18, and OCSD-19 are reaffirmed and readopted hereat, except to the extent that they have been specifically superseded or otherwise amended by specific Findings herein. ARTICLE II SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish Sanitary Sewer Service Charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 2.02. Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance, the owner of each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial, or industrial use and which, at the request of the owner or the owner's predecessor-in-interest, is connected to the District's system, shall pay an annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge based on the respective class of users, in the sum or sums, as set forth in Tables A and B of this Ordinance, below. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for residential users are set forth in Table A. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for commercial or industrial users are dependent upon the respective classifications of property use, determined by reference to Table B; the applicable percentage figure shown on Table B with respect to the particular use #179525:01/20/04-Redline 8 P. That the District's previous and present Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Ordinances, include[d] authority for the District to levy an excess or supplemental capacity charge upon commercial and industrial users who discharge quantities or high strength wastewater greater than the established base line of authorized discharge. Q. That the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges re-enacted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property or structure, by the District, within a given category. R. That the miscellaneous charges and fees re-enacted by this Ordinance without change are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged to each industrial discharger, source control permittee, or wastehauler and the service and facilities provided to each. S. That the District is required by federal and state law, including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq.), the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 C.F.R. 403), and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code Sections 13000 et seq.) to implement and enforce a program for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the District's sewers. T. That the District is required by federal, state and local law, to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality. U. That pursuant to these requirements, the Board of Directors has adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations. V. That the District incurs additional costs in conducting non- compliance sampling of those industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations and in administering the industrial, wastehauler, and special discharge permit programs. W. That Ordinance No OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, provides that the Board of Directors is to establish various fees and charges to recover those costs to the District which are made necessary by industrial dischargers and wastehaulers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. X. That the industrial discharger, source control, and wastehauler fees and charges hereby established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to the District of industrial discharger, source control, or wastehauler use of the District's facilities and for the #179525:01/20/04-Redline 7 J. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established and levied by this Ordinance are to allow the District to recover the reasonable costs to provide a service to individual properties which have been improved for any of numerous types of uses. The basis for the respective charge is the request of the owner of property or a structure thereon, for the benefit of him/her/itself, or the occupants of the property, to receive a service based upon actual use, consumption, and disposal of water to the District's system in lieu of disposal by other means. K. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance are not imposed as a condition of approval of a development project, as defined in California Government Code Section 66001, and do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016 and California Constitution Article XIIID. L. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these Sanitary Sewer Service Charges will not result in any specific project, nor result in a direct physical change in the environment. M. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities provided to each customer of the District, a portion of which are necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes to the State General Fund as a result of state legislative action on September 2, 1992, and in subsequent years. N. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinances, commencing in 1969, and most recently by Ordinance No. OCSD- 4-8 20, established Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges" or "fees", to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system. Said Charges are required as a financial payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the system, and for future facilities to be constructed. O. That the fees Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Capital Facilities Capacity Charges established here, are an incident but not a condition of development, payable only on request to receive service by the property owner ai4d for the benefit of those persons on the property that use the service. The charges are not an incident of property ownership, nor are they a property-related service having a direct relationship to property ownership, Accordingly, the provisions of California Constitution Article XIIID are not applicable. #179525:01/20104-Redline 6 Secondary Treatment Peer Review, as approved by the Board of Directors, has resulted in the development of a Capital Improvement Program that provides for the implementation of secondary treatment standards, thereby improving effluent quality in a reasonably short period of time, consistent with the goals and policies of the Board of Directors, the member agencies, and the public, while also providing for the construction of necessary improvements to accommodate projected increased flows and the rehabilitation and refurbishment of existing facilities. The Board further finds that programming annual adjustments in sewer service charges over a period of years is appropriate and ensures adequate revenues to finance the improvements and programs necessary to implement secondary treatment standards, accommodate increased flows, rehabilitate and refurbish existing facilities, and retire any necessary or prudent debt incurred to finance such improvements in a reasonable manner and over a reasonable period of time. The Board of Directors also finds that such Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Capital Facilities Capacity Charges are reasonably related to, and do not exceed the cost of providing sewer services. F. That the financial requirements of the District, as shown in reports prepared by Staff and Consultants relating to the Strategic Plan and the CIP validation studies, are based on current, reliable information and data relating to population projections, wastewater flow, and capital facilities' needs, and are expected to be realized in each year as described in the reports. G. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the sewage collection, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and to assist in the payment of costs to the.District to provide all regulatory administration and laboratory services related to the industrial dischargers, source control permittees, and wastehauler users of the District's systems. H. That the owners or occupants of properties upon which all fees and charges established by this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process. I. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public health and safety, and to preserve the environment without damage. #179525:01/20/04-Redline 5 A. That the former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California (the "Predecessor Districts"), were nine individual County Sanitation Districts, organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). By action of the Board of Directors of the Predecessor Districts, pursuant to specific legislation enacted by the California State Legislature in 1996, an application was submitted to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission to legally consolidate the nine Predecessor Districts into one single Sanitation District for all purposes. The application was approved, with an effective date of July 1, 1998. As of July 1, 1998, the Predecessor Districts ceased to exist, and one single consolidated County Sanitation District, known as the Orange County Sanitation District, came into existence in place of the Predecessor Districts. The District was formed to carry on the functions of the Predecessor Districts. B. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities, entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan — 1989", hereinafter referred to as the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, was prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, setting forth and identifying the required future development of District Facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the individual service areas of each of the nine Predecessor Districts. C. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan were made available to the public, both prior to and subsequent to the adoption of the Master Plan, and were subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of the California Constitution and Government Code Section 66016, and other provisions of law. D. That the District, in 1997, as part of its maintenance and updating of its Master Plan, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain access to the system. These comprehensive planning, engineering, and financial studies led to the development of an updated Comprehensive Master Plan of Capital Facilities, which was approved and adopted by OCSD Resolution No. 99-21 of the Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. E. That in support of this Ordinance and the revised charges for sewer service and/or Capital Facilities Capacity Charges as provided for on Tables A, C, D and G herein, the Board of Directors finds that the Capital Improvement Program ("CIP") Validation Study for Fiscal year 2003-04 and the #179525:01/20/04-Redline 4 Section 3.14, No Refund or Transfer Section 3.15, Baseline Transferability Table D Capital Facilities Capacity Charges ARTICLE IV: MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01, Purpose and Scope Section 4.02, Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees Section 4.03, Industrial Discharger, Source Control, and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Section 4.04, Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use Section 4.05, Class I and Class II Permittees— Charges for Use Section 4.06, Wastehauler Charges for Use Section 4.07, Administrative Appeals Table E Administrative Fees and Charges Relating To Permittees Table F Industrial Discharger, Source Control and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Table G Class I and Class II Permittees and Special Purpose Discharge Permittees Charges For Use Table H Wastehauler Charges for Use ARTICLE V: MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01, Application of Ordinance Section 5.02, Exceptions Section 5.03, Severability Section 5.04, Effective Date Section 5.05, Repeal Section 5.06, Certification and Publication ARTICLE I RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01 . Findings — Declaration of Intent. The Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Master Plans, as more particularly described in Findings B, C, D, and E below, setting forth the financial and engineering needs of the District, and hereby adopts the following Findings supporting the amounts of charges and fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. #179525:01120104-Redline 3 Section 2.03 A. Exemptions B. Application for Rebate C. Application for Refund D. Limitation Period E. Determination F. Administrative Fee Section 2.04, Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year Section 2.05, Method of Collection Section 2.06, Credit for Industrial Permittees Table A Annual Sewer Service Charges for Residential Users Table B Annual Sewer Service Charges Property Use Classifications for Commercial or Industrial Users ARTICLE III: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Section 3.01, Purpose and Scope Section 3.02, Definitions Section 3.03, Connection Permits: Required Section 3.04, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Section 3.05, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment Section 3.06, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts Section 3.07, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial — Industrial Users— Special Purpose Dischargers — Definitions Section 3.08, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial — Industrial Users Section 3.09, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Purpose Dischargers Section 3.10, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users— Special Purpose Dischargers Table C Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Section 3.11, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Section 3.12, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Section 3.13, Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements #179525:01/20/04-Redline 2 ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR INCREASED CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES AND CERTAIN SELF-MONITORING AND NON-COMPLIANCE CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-20 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ("District") has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-18, establishing annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for all uses, establishing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges to be imposed when properties either newly-connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District; establishing miscellaneous industrial discharger fees, source control/non-compliance sampling fees, and wastehauler charges, which Ordinance is presently in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, for purposes of improved efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations, it is the intent, by the adoption of this Ordinance, to re-enact the existing Ordinances that establish capital facilities fees and miscellaneous charges, and to provide for certain increases in certain sewer service charges. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: Section I. Fees and Charges Ordinance —Adopted TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I: RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01, Findings— Declaration of Intent ARTICLE II: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01, Purpose and Scope Section 2.02, Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge #179525:01/20/04-Rediine 1 Discharger Non-Compliance Sampling Charge Charge Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $ 21.00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) $ 44.00 BOD and Suspended Solids (SS) Analysis $ 67.00 Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 44.00 Conductivity $ 15.00 Cyanide (Amenable) $ 70.00 Dissolved Mineral Solids $ 15.00 Gamma Radiation Determination $115.00 Gross Alpha and Beta Determination $ 50.00 Tritium Determination $ 50.00 Oil & Grease (Hexane Soluble Matter) $ 74.00 Oil & Grease (Mineral Partition) $ 74.00 Total Organic Nitrogen $ 48.00 pH $ 8.00 Fluoride $ 51.00 Suspended Solids (Total) $ 23.00 Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) $ 44.00 Total Dissolved Solids $ 14.00 Total Sulfides $ 29.00 Self-Monitoring and Data Reporting Non-Compliance Cost of Processing and Issuing Significant Non-Compliance Notification $165.00 Cost of Processing Annual SNC and Publication $260.00 4 TABLE F DISCHARGER SOURCE CONTROL NON-COMPLIANCE FEES Discharger Non-Compliance Sampling Charge Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Minor Violation $225.00 per event Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Major Violation $500.00 per event Cost of Analysis Charge Heavy Metals $ 35.00 each • Aluminum • Antimony • Arsenic • Cadmium • Copper • Gold • Lead • Molybdenum • Nickel • Palladium • Platinum • Selenium • Silver • Thallium • Zinc Mercury $ 78.00 601/602 $152.00 604 $223.00 606 $254.00 608 $523.00 610 $ 73.00 612 $200.00 624 $355.00 625 $661.00 3 published or not, this fee is not waived or returned if, based on subsequent findings, the discharger is not published, or other enforcement actions are suspended. This fee will be assessed at the time the District sends and the discharger receives the notification that it has been found SNC for the fiscal year and publication, or other enforcement action, is pending. The total fee assessed a discharger who has failed to submit data, or is late in submitting data and designated SNC, and is then found to be an annual SNC, with potential publication, is $425.00 Staff proposes the following wording and changes to Ordinance No. OCSD-20: 1. Section 4.03, pg. 23 Section 4.03 Source Control Non-Compliance Fees. Source control non-compliance fees are hereby established for dischargers' non-compliance sampling and for self monitoring and data reporting non-compliance, in the sum or sums as set forth in Table F, below. 2. Table F, pg. 25 2 Self Monitoring Performance, Self Monitoring Reporting and Reporting Non Compliance Fees Source Control September, 2003 The Federal Code of Regulations, 40CFR403 requires that the District implement a pretreatment program (Source Control Program) that includes the implementation of a monitoring program of industrial users. One element of this monitoring program is self monitoring, by which, industrial dischargers to the sewer conduct self monitoring of their discharges and submit the data to the District. The District's Ordinance No. OCSD-01 authorizes the District to obtain from dischargers data and reports for self monitoring of wastewater constituents and characteristics to monitor the discharger's compliance with permit conditions and determination of annual user charges. The requirement to self monitor and provide data that establishes the industrial discharger's compliance status is instituted either through Wastewater Discharge Permit (Permit) conditions or through enforcement instruments such as Probation Orders, Environmental Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) and other administrative actions. District's Source Control division has developed, implemented and is administering as part of its approved Source Control Program self monitoring and reporting program that requires dischargers holding a permit with the District to self sample for constituents prescribed in the discharge permit and at a frequency specified in the permit, and provide reports on the results of the sampling on a schedule also specified as a condition of the permit. In addition, various other reports are required from the discharger to assess user charges and determine compliance either as part of the permit or as a result of enforcement actions. The District incurs costs whenever these requirements are not met, either by failure to perform the self monitoring action or provide data, or by failure to submit report of the required data or information in accordance with schedule. For these cases, the District incurs administrative costs in tracking, evaluation of status and in administering various notifications to the non-compliant discharger in accordance with legal and the EPA approved Enforcement Management Program. In accordance with federal regulations, any discharger who fails to provide a report required by the District within thirty (30) days from due date, is designated to be significantly non-compliant (SNC) and is subsequently, as a first enforcement step, published in a local newspaper followed by enforcement actions to attain compliance. Because of the administration and programmatic requirements, and because of due process in case of an SNC finding, the District incurs significant costs for each discharger who is delinquent in reporting. The District proposes two levels of cost assessments. 1. SNC Determination. This involves one or two late notifications (depending on the reporting program), delinquency evaluation to determine SNC status and notifications, follow up actions and determination of further enforcement. The cost to the District for each discharger who is designated and notified to be SNC is assessed at $165.00. 2. Annual SNC and Publication. Following a finding of SNC, the District evaluates and takes action to publish SNC permittees in the local paper, as required by federal regulations. This action includes several steps, including notification, meetings, notification of the paper, and final review of findings. The cost to the District for each discharger found annual SNC and considered for publication is assessed at$260.00. Because costs would have been incurred by the District whether the discharger is 1 Current Capital Facilities Capacity Charges The current CFCCs were adopted by Ordinance in June of 1999. Pursuant to Board policy, new rates were proposed to the FAHR Committee in May 2003, subsequent to the Interim Strategic Plan Update and the Validated Capital Improvement Program. The proposed CFCC rate changes were deferred by the Committee pending additional information, leaving the 1999 rates in effect as shown below. CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial — Industrial Per 1,000 square feet Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 110.00 Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 675.00 High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,600.00 Single Family Residential Per Unit 5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530.00 4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,475.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130.00 Multi-Family Residential Per Unit 4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,620.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910.00 Studio Per Unit $ 580.00 The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (SCFCC) is applied to Significant Industrial Users on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the User's baseline. The SCFCC charge is based upon each discharge component and includes a nominal interest charge because the facilities must be paid for by the District in advance . Component Measurement Daily Charge Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057 BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461 SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025 Page 3 of 3 Important Parameters Affecting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Revised November 26,2003 E Recommended"Growth Pays For Growth"Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Commercial Residential /Industrial Total 1 Additional Capacity Projects $ 548,416,000 $287,584,000 $836,000,000 2 Adjust Wet Weather Flow Facilities 35,184,000 (35,184,000) - 3 Additional Capacity Adjusted for WW $ 583,600,000 $252,400,000 $836,000,000 4 New EDUs in 2020 202,000 106,000 308,000 5 CFCC per EDU $ 2,890 $ 2,380 $ 2,714 6 New Non- Res 1000 sq ft in OCSD $ 126,000 7 New Non-Res 1000 sq ft o/s OCSD 115,000 8 Total New Non-Res 1000 sq ft $ 241,000 9 CFCC per 1000 sq ft $ 1,050 10 Use Category SFR Factor Res Rates Non Res Rates 11 Commercial/Industrial 12 Low Demand $ 170 13 Average Demand 1,050 14 High Demand 2,490 15 Single Family Residential 16 5+ Bedrooms 1.39 $ 4,020 17 4 Bedrooms 1.19 3,440 18 3 Bedrooms 1.00 2,890 19 2 Bedrooms 0.81 2,340 20 1 Bedrooms 0.62 1,790 21 Multi-Family Residential 22 4+Bedrooms 1.08 3,120 23 3 Bedrooms 0.89 2,570 24 2 Bedrooms 0.70 2,020 25 1 Bedrooms 0.50 1,450 26 Studio 0.32 920 27 Supplemental CFCC for Permit Users,includes 5%cost of funds 28 Flow, per million gallons per day $ 0.001001 29 BOD, per 1000 pounds per day 0.289100 30 SS, per 1000 pounds per day 0.187150 1/2112004 H:\dept\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Reports\0104\Item 23.2.xis Page 2 of 3 , Important Parameters Affecting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Revised November 26,2003 D Preliminary Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Options J K L M N O 1999 2003 RRR Paid Fixed Assets Growth Pays Strat Plan Val CIP By User Fee Only For Growth 1 Existing Net Non-Capital Assets $ 347,000,000 572,000,000 572,000,000 2 Existing Net Capital Assets 416,000,000 502,000,000 502,000,000 502,000,000 3 Additional Capacity 805.000,000 836,000,000 836,000,000 836,000,000 836,000,000 4 Improved Treatment 48,000,000 562,000,000 562,000,000 562,000,000 5 Replacement, Rehab, Refurb 665,000,000 1,053,000,000 6 Support 14.000,000 106,000,000 106,000,000 106,000,000 - 7 Total $ 2,295,000,000 3,631,000,000 2,578,000,000 2,006,000,000 $ 836,000,000 8 EDUs in 2020 @ 260 gpd 1,354,000 1,235,000 1,235,000 1,235,000 308,000 9 Investment per EDU" $ 1,695 $ 2,940 $ 2,087 $ 1,624 $ 2,714 10 Raised by new EDUs $ 723,630,000 $ 905,540,000 $ 642,930,000 $ 500,280,000 $ 836,000,000 Differs from CFCC per base 3 bedroom SFR because Infiltration,Inflow and Runoff adjustments have not been included 1/2112004 H:\dept\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Reports\0104\Item 23.2.xls Page 1 of 3 Important Parameters Affecting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Revised November 26,2003 A Planning Parameters 1989 1999 2003 Master Plan Strat Plan Validated CIP 1 Planning horizon 30 yrs 21 yrs 19 yrs 2 CIP budget $1.48 billion $1.51 billion $2.38 billion 3 Projected Flow 399 MGD 352 MGD 321 MGD 4 Flow per household(EDU) 399 gpd 260 gpd 260 gpd 5 Number of flow based EDUs 1,000,000 1,354,000 1,235,000 6 Flow per 1,000 sq ft for average commercial user 80 gpd 150 gpd 150gpd 7 Commercial 1,000 ft: SFR ratio 20% 58% 58% B Growth Projections 2020-2000 2000 2005 2020 %Change Source 1 Population,w/o OCSD 14 2,191,610 2,283,298 2,466,220 12.5% CDR 2 Housing,w/o OCSD 14 723,299 732,729 768,848 6.3% CDR 3 Employment,w/o OCSD 14 1,112,369 1,221,786 1,426,757 28.3% CDR 4 Single Family Residences 427,007 454,000 6.3% 2020 quant OC Ass'r 5 Multi Family Residences 239,310 254,000 6.1% adj to keep OC Ass'r 6 Assessor Housing w/o 14 666,317 708,000 6.3% CDR ratio OC Ass'r 7 1,000 sq ft non-residential 446,108 572,000 28.2% constant OC Ass'r 8 Flow from OCSD 14(IRWD) 6 12 32 433.3% CDM ISPU 9 Flow from SAWPA 6 15 30 400.0% CDM ISPU 10 Flow w/o 14&SAWPA 229 237 259 15.1% CDM ISPU 11 Flow from all sources, MGD 241 264 321 34.9% CDM ISPU C Daily Flow Contributions 2000 Actual 2020 Projections OC Assessor Average CDR Adj'd Percent Number of Daily Flow Number of Of Average Units or (Gallons) Average Units or Increased Property Use MGD 1,000 sq ft Per Unit MGD 1,000 sq ft Flow 1 Residential 111 427,000 260 118 454,000 8.8% 2 Multi-Family Residential 43 239,000 182 46 254,000 3.8% 3 Commercial 67 446,000 150 86 572,000 23.8% 4 IRWD(OCSD14) 6 32 32.5% 5 SAWPA 6 30 30.0% 6 Wet Weather, Infiltration, Inflow 8 9 1.3% 7 Average MGD total 241 321 100.0% 1/21/2004 Wdept\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2004 Board Agenda Reports\0104\Item 23.2.x1s Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) Page 4 of 4 December 10, 2003 Twenty-four mgd is projected to come from SAWPA. SAWPA pays for capacity when needed based upon the average strength of their discharge for the prior year and the treatment and disposal plant portion of the CFCC; they already own sufficient collection system capacity. (Although SAWPA currently owns 13 million gallons per day of treatment and disposal capacity, and has a right to purchase another 17 million gallons per day, they were only discharging at the rate of 6 million gallons per day when the Strategic Plan was completed.) Essentially SAWPA pays the CFCC like other users. Twenty-six mgd is projected to come from the area served by the IRWD. The IRWD users do not pay OCSD a CFCC directly. Instead, IRWD pays a share of the monthly outlay for capital improvement projects based upon the IRWD share of total flow. Each year the accumulated payments are adjusted to reflect the current shares. Currently, IRWD uses and has paid for about 3% of the total treatment facilities. By 2020, this percentage is expected to increase to about 10%. During this period, IRWD will routinely purchase additional capacity at the actual cost to provide that capacity up to 32 million gallons per day. The remaining 30 mgd will come from new and existing users in the District's service area. This growth has been allocated to match the population, housing and employment projections from the Center for Demographic Research at California State University at Fullerton. These growth projections indicate that only 37% of the funds for capital improvements will come from CFCCs and the majority of funds will come from SAWPA and from IRWD. GGS G:\wp.dta\fin1210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Staff Report ConnFee 12-03.doc `e Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) Page 3 of 4 December 10, 2003 Future Facilities CFCC rate = --------------------- Future Users In order to use this method, it is necessary to know the projected cost of future facilities to provide both capacity and secondary treatment to future users as well as the number of future users. If this methodology were implemented, then the total fees collected from "new growth" would be exactly equal to the cost of the anticipated additional capacity projects. Bedrooms as Basis for Residential CFCCs One of the recommendations of the Rate Advisory Committee (RAC)was that the residential connection fee should be tiered to reflect actual or potential impact on the District's facilities. Prior to the RAC's work, there was only one rate for all types of residential connections. Consultants and staff analyzed census data and County Assessor's Office data to establish a correlation between some data point and sewer system demand. The data set with the best correlation was the number of bedrooms although other parameters, including number of bathrooms were considered. Sewer system demand is a function of population; the more people there are in a home, the higher the sewer system demand. While there are certainly exceptions, some of them notable, the number of people in a dwelling unit is more closely aligned to the number of bedrooms than to the number of bathrooms. Of course, this is not a perfect match and the closeness to actual varies over time. It would not be uncommon for a family of two to purchase a four-bedroom home, for the family to grow to four or more for several years, and then to become a family of two again after some time. During this period, the household impact on sewer system demand could go from below average to above average and back to below average. The intent of the CFCC basis is to match the fee with the potential average demand. Residential dwelling modifications sometimes lead to issues with this method of determining fees. A CFCC is due only when a building permit is requested for an additional bedroom. An additional bathroom does not require a fee. An additional den or office does not require a fee. There have been instances of plans being resubmitted after the fees are quoted and the revised plans show offices replacing bedrooms in the original plans. One could speculate that the closet might be added later, without a building permit. Staff is recommending that we accept this potential dishonesty as a cost of doing business. Our CFCC structure is based upon the number of bedrooms reflecting the potential sewer use. Changing the basis to bathrooms for building modifications will negate our existing structure. Including dens, offices, family rooms and other additional spaces as a basis is also counter to our original theory. We simply don't have the nexus established to use other than bedrooms. Sources of Future Flows The Interim Strategic Plan Update projects average daily flows of 321 million gallons in 2020. This will be an increase of 80 million gallons per day over the 241 million gallons per day flow at the time the Interim Strategic Plan was completed. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) , Page 2 of 4 December 10, 2003 In order to use this formula, residential and non-residential users must first be converted to "equivalent dwelling units." The flow, BOD and SS discharges from a three-bedroom single family residence are used to establish the number of EDUs. This is the formula that was used to calculate the CFCCs that were presented to the FAHR in May of 2003. After reviewing every project in the Validated CIP for the proper allocation to flow, BOD and SS, to residential and non-residential users and the impacts of wet weather infiltration and inflow, the result of this calculation was an increase in the SFR rate from $1,820 to $3,063; an increase of 68%. If these rates were to be adopted, then the total fees collected from "new growth"would be sufficient to cover the anticipated additional capacity projects. Variations on the Capital Investment Equalization Method Theme There is some latitude within the broad theory of the capital investment equalization method. One variation is that only the existing facilities and future additions should be included. This variation would remove the projected cost of future rehabilitation, refurbishment and replacement facilities from the CFCC and would have the RRR projects paid from annual user fees. Since all users of the system pay user fees on the basis of flow, BOD and SS, all users (existing and future)would then pay their fair share of these projects. Since the CFCC is expected to be revised approximately every five years when the Strategic Plan is updated, any RRR projects during the five years would move into the existing facilities category; increasing future CFCC rates. If this methodology were implemented, then the total fees collected from "new growth"would be approximately 80% of the anticipated additional capacity projects. Another variation could be to exclude the net current assets from the calculation. This exclusion could be in addition to excluding the RRR projects above, or in place of that. The rationale for excluding these costs is that they are not capital facilities; they are cash, investments, inventory, etc. Many of these current assets will be expended on operations and maintenance for the benefit of existing users. Those that are used for capital improvements will be included in existing net capital assets when the CFCCs are reconsidered with the future Strategic Plans. If this methodology were implemented, then the total fees collected from "new growth" would be approximately 60% of the anticipated additional capacity projects. Growth Pays for Growth Growth pays for growth is the shorthand way to express the belief that in order for new users to pay their fair share of capital improvement costs, they should pay for all of the new capacity facilities. The thinking behind this is that we would incur almost all of the other capital improvement costs whether or not there are any new users. This could be called the incremental cost method. Existing current assets were obtained from current users and will be used for capital projects that benefit current users or for operations and maintenance expenses on current capital assets. Current capital assets were constructed with funds from current users and would be sufficient for current users' needs into the future. Future RRR projects will be funded by then current users through the user fee. The simplified formula for computing the growth pays for growth rate can be shown as: 4oJNty SANINTroy c+ 0 FG•rry HE fNV`Q0� December 10, 2003 STAFF REPORT Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) BACKGROUND Capital Facilities Capacity Charges are typically one-time fees paid by developers when building permits are issued. The fees are collected for the District by the member agency responsible for local sewers. For 2002-03, the total CFCC's collected amounted to just over$10 million; approximately 6% of the District's revenues. The current CFCC rates, structure and philosophy were adopted subsequent to the 1999 Strategic Plan and the Rate Advisory Committee process. When the rates were recalculated to incorporate the changes from the Interim Strategic Plan Update and the Validated Capital Improvement Program, the FAHR Committee asked that they be revisited. Among the Committee's concerns were whether new development would be expected to pay for additional capacity and whether the number of bedrooms was the appropriate basis for residential fees. Capital Investment Equalization Method Beginning with the "2020 Master Plan"which was adopted in 1989, the District's connection fee or CFCC has been computed using the Capital Investment Equalization Method. While the method and the theory have not changed, the costs that are included and the rates that result have changed. The basic theory is that all of the users in 2020 will have paid the same dollar amount for the facilities that exist in 2020. In 1999, this base fee was modified to reflect the differing demands from differing sizes of residential uses and differing types of non-residential users. The Capital Investment Equalization Method means that new users are required to pay for a share of existing facilities, existing current assets, future capacity, future improved treatment and future rehabilitation, refurbishment and replacement projects. Existing users will also pay a share though user fees, property taxes or previously paid connection fees. The simplified formula for computing the base rate can be shown as: (Existing Facilities —Depr+ Future Facilities + RRR Projects) CFCCrate = ------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Existing Users + Future Users) OCSD — P.O.Box 8127 — Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 — (714)962-2411