The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003-12-17phone: [7141 962-2411 fax: (714) 962-0356 www.oc s d .com ma lling address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 street add ress: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Member Agenc ies Cities Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Garden Grove Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Pslms Los Alamitos Newport Besch Orange Placentia Ssnts Ans Seal Besch Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linde County of Ora nge Sanitary Districts Costs M ess Midway City Water Di s tricts Irvine Rench OR ANG E CO UNTY SANITATION DISTR ICT December 11 , 2003 NOTICE OF MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2003-7 :00 P.M. DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Valley , California 92708 The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange Co unty Sanitation D istrict will be held at th e above location , time and date . JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITIEE -Monday, January 12, 2004 at 5:30 p .m . @OCWD STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5 :00 p.m. To maintain world-class leadership m wastewater and water resource management. BOARD MEETING DATES Board Meeting January 28, 2004 February 25, 2004 March 24, 2004 April 28, 2004 May 26, 2004 June 23, 2004 *July 21, 2004 August25,2004 September 22, 2004 October 27. 2004 *November 17, 2004 *December 15, 2004 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\Agenda\2003 Meeting Notices\MN12.2.doc RE : AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DIS T RIC T'S AD MINISTRATIVE OF FI CES 1084 4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 9270 8 REGULAR MEETING Dec e mbe r 17, 2003 -7 :00 P.M . Mi nute excerpts have been received as set forth below . Pu rsuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and fi le said excerpts : 3. Consideration of motion to recei ve and file minute excerpts fro m the foll owing re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency La Hab ra Stanton Villa Pa rk Yo rba Lin da Acti ve Director Steve Anderson Brian Donahue Patricia Bortle Michael Duva ll G :\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agendas\2003 Board Ag endas\12 17 03 supplemental.doc A lternate Director Steve Simonian David Shawver Robert McGowan Ke r i Lynn Wilson STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2, I hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on @ ~; 7 , 2003, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ~~rfuv 11 , 2003. . 2#. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this // day of !Jui~ , 2003. ---#',--~--- Penny M. Kyle, Se Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District G:\WP.DTA\ADM IN\BS\FORM S\AGE NDA CE RTIFICATIO N .DOC ' . ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE : 12/17/03 TIME : 7:00 p.m. 11.fali. v ?- ~ (lf" ¥>5 (S IMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON ................... i/ _f _ _L_ (WILSON ) ........................ BANKHEAD ................... _L_ _Y_ v (MC GOWAN) ................... --09RTt E ...................... _L _'/_ ~ (SWAN) ............................ BRADY ......................... ___£ _:L_ _L_ (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . c~ 0 C0 __ (AM BRIZ) .......................... CAVECCHE ................... ---;r-_j__ ~?f.rf)-flt.r (GARCIA) ......................... CHRISTY..................... ~ _j_ / (CRANDALL) .................... COLLINS ...................... ~ _.:[_ ..L_ (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK .......................... _L --i;L._ ~ (BROADWATER) ............. DAL TON ....................... _L_ _j__ _L_ (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE ..................... ~ CL.-a- (WILSON) ......................... DUVALL...................... c/ _:!__ v (UNDERHILL) ................... ECKENRODE ................. _L _L_ a. i.4 /:#1,,;-- (SCHAFER) ...................... FERRYMAN ................... __L_ '/ _.!L._ (POE) ................................ JEMPSA. ..................... _L_ I _x:__ (DAVERT) ......................... KAWASHIMA ............... __i.L_ _j__ -1L__ (SHEA) ............................. KROM ........................ _.lL_ _Y _ _L_ (DOW) .............................. MARSHALL. ................. _L _i_ -±::::_ (HERNANDEZ) ................. --Me C~AC~EN-:-:-:-............ ~ cJdv. ...J.L_ (BEAUMAN) ..................... MOORE ........................ ____L_ _i_ v (EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER.............. c/ _1'..__ ...-- (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY ........................ _L _:!_ ~ (WEBB) ............................ RIDGEWAY ................... CL _fL_ ~ (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA ........................... ~ cA.-" ~ ,-- (HERMAN) ........................ WALKER ....................... ____ Y _ aJ.O 'tiu,c __ STAFF: Anderson Beek man Ghirelli Kyle ~ dti.,f t.&,_ Miles v O o t en Tomko Stre e d OTHERS: W ood ruff Ni xon 1 2/17 /03 v v v / / ........ v- ./ i/ L/ '-j1i<--t( )Jl{t--r (_ !Ar vl /~ll.<: A,t,v {/ 'fl l ~. --I "/ . tl; IL ltV..J;t,( {U(Jl-1_ jJ cu, ... lLL ~L {-&t- G :\wp .dta\admin\B S\DIRECTOR\Directo rs Ro ll Call.doc -. ' SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ ___,_/_~~· !_.:,_/_'(-+-j -=--{L3 ______ BOARD MEETING , I NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM (~lease ~rint) (please print) ~) J /JnA< EN' h1/rJ-L --R,1 ri--W' j) ~~flt~J 60lf<.h- H:\W P.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\SIGN-IN FORM.DOC MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 10, 2003, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Brian Brady, Chair Roy Moore, Vice Chair Bill Dalton Joy Neugebauer James W. Silva Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Steve Anderson, Vice Board Chair Directors Absent: Alberta Christy Mike Duvall (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Gary Streed, Director of Financefrreasurer Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager Bob Ooten, Director of O&M Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Mike White, Controller Simon Watson, Maintenance Manager Dionne Kardos, Public Information Specialist Jim Burrer, Senior Engineer Mike Moore, ECM Manager Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager Layne Baroldi, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs Liaison Ana Burkhart, Principal Communications Specialist Jean Tappan, Acting Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Toby Weissert Bob Geggie Mark Esquer Charles Egiggian Nichols Chair Brian Brady announced that he would have to leave early and that Vice Chair Roy Moore would chair the remainder of the meeting. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page2 December 10, 2003 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Brian Brady announced that the next meeting of the FAHR Committee will be February 11. The Committee will not meet in January. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson announced that the third Orange County Leadership Symposium would be held January 9-11, 2004, in Lake Arrowhead. A copy of the registration form was provided and he encouraged all Directors to attend. Mr. Anderson also announced that the District has received the AMSA award for Excellence in Management. There will be a presentation ceremony at the AMSA Winter Conference in Los Angeles in February. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER Finance Director Gary Streed reported that the SWAP report includes the SW AP policy. This is required to be provided for the initial report or for the first report after any changes to the policy. Mr. Streed also reported that budget assumptions will be presented at the February FAHR Committee meeting. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES Director of Human Resources Lisa Tomko did not make a report. (8) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES MANAGER Communications Services Manager Carol Beekman did not make a report. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas Woodruff announced that the Court of Appeals has affirmed the trial court's decision regarding Crow Winthrop. The Appellate Court issued a ruling that the District's Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Ordinance is not subject to Proposition 218 and therefore the fees imposed on Crow Winthrop were not invalidly charged. Appellate costs are to be paid by Crow Winthrop. (1 O) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The Chair ordered that the November 12, 2003 minutes for the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved, as mailed. b. FAHR03-101 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2003. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page3 December 10, 2003 c. FAHR03-102 Receive and file Certificate of Participation {COP) Monthly Report. d. FAHR03-103 Receive and file Employment Status Report as of November 25, 2003. e. FAHR03-104 Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. f. FAHR03-105 Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing policies. g. FAHR03-106 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file the SWAP Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. h. FAHR03-107 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. MOTION: OCSD 03-_, Approving Amendments to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 1 O{a) through {h) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR03-108 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager MOTION: to solicit Requests for Proposal and subsequently award a Consultant Services Agreement for Corporate Identify and Public Awareness Project, Specification No. CS-2003-16280, in an amount not to exceed $325,000. Communications Services Manager Carol Beekman described the need for the project and the scope of the project. This project was identified in the Communications Plan that was presented to the FAHR Committee in October 2003. The five project components were discussed. The Directors expressed concern about the estimated cost for the total project. There is $125,000 allocated for this work in the fiscal year 2003-04 budget and if all five components are completed, an additional $200,000 would have to be included in the fiscal year 2004-05 budget. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval of Phase 1 {identified as the Initial Baseline Research component) in an amount not to exceed $50,000. Director Joy Neugebauer opposed. The Committee unanimously approved forwarding to a future Board meeting the reports and the subject of the entire staff-proposed budget of $325,000 to the Board without any recommendation. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page4 December 10, 2003 b. FAHR03-109 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-21, MOTION: Adopting Fees, Procedures and Policies Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-03. Mr. Streed stated that included in the ordinance is Section 6 which declares this an urgency ordinance. This declaration could be removed. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval without the urgency provision to the Board of Directors. c. FAHR03-110 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-22, MOTION: Reaffirming Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Providing for Increased Capital Facilities Capacity Charges and Certain New Self-Monitoring and Non Compliance Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-20. Mr. Streed explained that the changes being requested are minor except for the amounts of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges. Because user fees will be considered in April this item could be delayed until then if the Directors desired. After full discussion, It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. d. FAHR03-111 1) Consider proposal submitted by Revenue Enhancement Group (REG), MOTION: dated November 2003, Identifying Undercharged Commercial Parcels; and, 2) Direct staff to return to the FAHR Committee for approval of a Request for Proposal for some or all of the services proposed by REG; -OR- 3) Direct staff to return to the FAHR Committee with alternatives to administrating the current sewer user fee program. Adam Probolsky spoke in support of the proposal. Mr. Streed briefed the directors on the District's process for collecting the annual sewer service user fees and the recent changes to the rate structure. He confirmed that there are about 28,000 parcels that haven't been looked at. The California Government Code and the existing ordinance allow for seeking any under-billed user fees for the prior four years. Mr. Woodruff discussed some of the potential legal concerns in the event of challenges, as well as the possibility of requiring a public hearing. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to forward the item to the full Board without a FAHR recommendation. This item will be considered by the Board in January when additional information is available. At 6:50 p.m. Chair Brian Brady left the meeting. ) '· Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page5 December 10, 2003 (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR03-112 Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7 Jim Burrer made a presentation on the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, outlining the process staff and the consultant have taken to develop the plan and describing the findings and recommendations. The plan will be received and filed at the December 17, 2003 Board meeting. Requests for proposal will be issued to fill the interim gap before the long-term options can be implemented. At 7:15 p.m. Director Neugebauer left the meeting. b. FAHR03-113 Status of O&M Reinvention and the District Assessment and Reinvention Team Program Bob Ooten and Simon Watson reported on the status of the reinvention program and outlined the next steps. Staff will continue to work on improving maintenance, replace the Computerized Maintenance Management System that can no longer handle all of the information that is available and spend the right dollars in the right places using asset management principles. (13) CLOSED SESSION General Counsel Woodruff announced the need to discuss an additional item not previously noticed as required by Government Code Section 54954.2(1 ). A motion was duly adopted by unanimous vote to add the following item to the agenda pursuant to the authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b}(2): one matter of possible litigation. The Committee convened in Closed Session at 7:38 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider added item and Agenda Item No. 13(a) (1 ). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:08 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page6 December 10, 2003 (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for February 11, 2004 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Submitted by: J n Tappan ing FAHR Committee Secretary G:\wp.dta\agenda\FAHA\FAHR2003\1203\121003 FAHR Minutes.doc phone: (714) 962-2411 fax: (714) 962-0356 www.ocsd.com malling address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 street address: 1 0844 Blis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Member Agencies • Cities Anaheim Brae Buena Park Cypress Fountain Va/lay Fullerton Garden Grove Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda County of Orange Sanitary Districts Costa Mesa Midway City Water Di s tricts Irvine Ranch ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTR ICT December 10, 2003 To th e Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Subject: Board Letter The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional information on any of the items, please call me. OCSD Administrative Offices Holiday Closures The OCSD Administrative offices will be closed Wednesday, December 24, Thursday, Decembe r 25, 2003, and January 1, 2004. The control center wi ll be manned 24/7 in case of e mergencies . EPA's Support for the Land Application of Biosolids In a recent letter to state officials, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reiterated its position that the land application of biosolids is considered a sound management option for the nation's wastewater treatment plants. The director of the EPA Office of Wastewater Management issued this letter in response to recent concerns raised by state officials about comments that the EPA's director of research made on an October 29 CBS News story indicating uncertainty about the safety of using biosolids as fertilizer. In the CBS News story , Paul Gilman, EPA assistant administrator for research and development, commented on community concerns regarding the land application of biosolids for fertilizer stating that he cou ld not say the practice was "perfectly safe." H e cited un certainty surrounding the practice and said more research was needed. State officials were concerned that Mr. Gilman's remarks would be misconstru ed by the public to mean that EPA could not assure that land application of biosolids was safe. In the letter, EPA said that whi le the agency continues to support the land application of biosolids, EPA "re-evaluates its technical regulations on a regular basis to ensure they are still appropriate, technically sound and adequate ly protective." Environmental advocates and some commun ity groups have been critical of the agency's position on b iosolids saying EPA needs to set more stringent regulations for toxics. The National Research Council (NRC) studied the curren t federal regulatory program for biosolids and reported in July 2002 that EPA needed to do more research on the environme ntal and health effects of applying biosolids to land. The report said that there was no evidence to s u ggest that EPA's biosolids regulations did not provide adequate protections. To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. Board of Directors Page 2 December 10, 2003 EPA will publish a final plan responding to the NRC report in January 2004 laying out its agenda for biosol ids management including research goals. State Report on Water Recycling 2030 The Califo rnia D epartment of Water Resources has just re leased a re port entitled Water Recycling 2030. The transmittal letters , executive summary and table of contents are included for your information . The tas k force that wrote th e report reco mmends state-wide spending of $400 million per year to produce 1 .2 mill ion acre-feet (1,0 00 MGD) of new water by 2030 at an average cost of $600/A.F. The task force also recommends ongoing review of indirect potab le reuse to ens u re adequate long-term health protection. Finally, the tas k force concludes that "it is possible to substantially advance the safe use of recycled wate r." Secondary Treatment Standards Update All op e rationall y available secondary treatment facilities are onl ine. Staff continues to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance towa rd secondary treatment standards. The final effluent is a blend of 64% secondary treatment and 36% primary treatment , which is at our target of 64% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board 's decision of Ju ly 17 , 2002 , the District's final effluent quality ave raged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During November 2003 , the final effluent averaged 33 ppm TSS and 63 p pm BOD versus the secondary treatment goal is 30/30 ppm TSS and BOD . Disinfection Update Our final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using th e tempo rary facility disinfection system, which has no w been in operation sinc e August 2002. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform , fecal col iform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. November 2003 resu lts for total coliform averaged about 2,780 MPN/100 ml, w hich is substantially below the final effluent goal of 180,000 MPN/1 OOmL. The 180 ,000 MPN/1 OOmL goal was developed by using the 180:1 dilutio n the outfall provided. This is multiplied by the bacteria num be rs specified in the regulations , such as the total coliform regulation which is 1 ,00 0 MPN/1 OOmL at the 3-mile line offshore in the ocean. The final effluent had a ma x imum 0 .20 ppm chlorine residual averaged over eight hours on one day, which is well below th e 1.45 ppm daily maximum compliance lim it. Additional disinfection data is reported on the Web @ www.ocsd.com . The upgraded bleach/dechlorination (dechlor) facilities were approved by the Board of Directors in January 2003 and construction is nearly complete. Final commissioning tests of the new chlorination and dechlorination facilities are in progress at this time. These upgraded bleach and dechlorination facilities will be used until the District has determined th e long-term technol ogy that will be used fo r disinfection. Board of Directors Page 3 December 10, 2003 Articles of Interest I have also included several additional published articles that you might find interesting. If you would like additional information on any of the above items , please call me . I would like to take th is opportunity to thank all of you for your support during this past year and to wish you a wonderful holiday season . Blake P. Anderson Ge neral Manager BPA:jt G:IWP.DTAIAOMIN\GMILETIERS TD T HE BDARD\031121003 BOARD LETTER.DOC Attachments ~ t I t. " ' ~ .. t t • L ,. I "' ... I r I ~ .. ' ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA --THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 1416 NINTH STREET, P.O. BOX 942836 SACRAMENTO, CA 94236-0001 (916) 653-5791 Mr. E. Dotson Wilson Chief Clerk of the Assembly State Capitol, Room 3196 Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Mr. Wilson: GRAY DAVIS. Gove JUL 0 3 2003 On behalf of the Recycled Water Task Force, we are pleased to present to you the report entitled, Water Recycling 2030: Recommendations of California's Recycled Water Task Force. This report addresses the mission established in Assembly Bill 331, Chapter 590, Statues of 2001, to evaluate the current framework of State and local rules, regulations, ordinances, and permits to identify the opportunities for and obstacles or disincentives to increasing the safe use of recycled water. This report's recommendations represent the members' commitment to public safety and the need for efficient use of the State's water resources. The task force estimated that by year 2030, California has the potential to recycle up to 1.5 million acre-feet per year of, yielding about 1.2 million af of new water. This could free up fresh water supplies to meet approximately 30 percent of the household water needs associated with projected population growth. However, to achieve that potential, Californians will have to invest nearly $11 billion (approximately $400 million annually) for additional infrastructure to produce and deliver the recycled water. It should be noted that average unit costs have been estimated to be about $600 per af. These costs are generally comparable to other water supply options, for example, new dams and reservoirs or desalination . The task force's membership of 40 people represented federal, State, local government, public health professionals, private sector entities, environmental organizations, University of California, internationally recognized researchers, public interest groups, and is a cooperative effort of the Department of Water Resources, State Water Resources Control Board, and Department of Health Services. This report is the culmination of over 12 months of intensive study and consultation by task force members, other interested participants and staff. The recommendations are not restricted to legislative actions or statutory changes. Many can be implemented by State or local agencies without further legislative · authorization or mandate. Some recommendations draw upon the experience of many agencies and provide advice that can be used as a toolbox for communities to improve their planning for recy9led water projects. The task force membership included a diversity of viewpoints. One issue where this diversity was most evident was the topic of indirect potable reuse; therefore, the report includes a specific recommendation for an independent review panel on indirect potable reuse to ensure adequate health and safety assurance for California residents. Mr. E. Dotson Wilson JUL 0 3 2003 Page2 The recommendations addressing the priority issues emphasized by the task force are included in Chapter 4, Issue Areas and Key Recommendations, of the enclosed report. In addition to the key recommendations, the task force has adopted additional recommendations that will also enhance our ability to implement water recycling projects. These additional important recommendations are included in Chapter 5 of the enclosed report. This report includes specific actions for implementation of the recommendations. Where legislative action is needed, the task force will request the Legislature to consider its recommendations. In addition to input from industry and government, these recommendations benefited tremendously from the input of the general public. This input helped inform the task force's thinking and the report as a whole. We thank all who so generously contributed their time and expertise to this report. The task force believes that the recommendations in this report will improve the status of recycled water in the State. The task force is convinced that it is possible to substantially advance the safe use of recycled water, and it looks forward to helping implement the recommendations. On behalf of the Recycled Water Task Force and the Department of Water Resources, we appreciate the opportunity to transmit this reportto you. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Fawzi Karajeh of DWR's Office of Water Use Efficiency at (916) 651-9669, or by e-mail at: fkarajeh@water.ca.gov. Sincerely, Michael SP. Interim Di tor Department of Water Resources '~ . RlCfui~sk Force Chair Board Member State Water Resources Control Board .. Date_'l.._:,~'-l--?1-=r;3 ____ _ 11~c~ Date. ____ -_? ________ _ Enclosure ; California Department of Water Resources Rec_yded Water Task Force Water Rec_yding20JO: Recommendations of California's Rec_yded Water Task Force June2003 Letter of Transmittal b_y Task Force to Department Thomas Hannigan, Director California Department of Water Resources 1416 9th Street, 11th Floor Sacramento, Caiifomia 95814 Dear Director Hannigan: We, the Recycled Water Task Force (Task Force), are pleased to present to you our report entitled "Water Recycling 2030: Recommendations of California s Recycled Water Task Force." This report addresses the mission established in Assembly Bill 331 (Goldberg 2001 ): to evaluate the current framework of State and local rules, regulations, ordinances, and permits to identify the opportunities for and obstacles or disincentives to increasing the safe use of recycled water. The reports recommendations were arrived at through consensus and represent the members' commitment to public safety and the need for effi- cient use of the States water resources. As the Director of the California Department of Water Resources, you understand the need to consider all viable options for augmenting the States water supplies. Although we acknowledge that there are additional approaches to meet California s water require- ments, the Task Force was formed to specifically address recycled water issues. We con- sider recycled water as one important facer of the total solution. The Task Force, pursuant to your appointments, included 40 members representing fed- eral, State, and local governmental and private sector entities, environmental organiza- tions, and public interest groups, and is a cooperative effort of the California Department of Water Resources, the State Water Resources Control Board, and the Department of Health Services. This report is the culmination of over twelve months of intensive study and consultation by Task Force members, other interested participants, and staff. The Task Force met eight times in four cities in Northern and Southern California. In addi- tion, it sponsored three public discussion sessions and 22 workgroup meetings for farther deliberation and public input. SIGNATORIES Board Member California State Water Resources Control Board onas Minton, a k orce Co-Vice Chair Deputy Director California Department of Water Resources Takashi Asano l'M6t Carlson Capital Projects Manager Utilities Department, City of Santa Rosa ~/~ Herman C. Collins re ·dent Col Strategic G up, In Gary Erbe Director Department of · nmental Health County of San Diego === I Chief Executive Officer Inland Empire Utilities Agency .lValllllllg Contra Costa Water District ~if, Bob Castle Water Quality Manager Marin Municipal Water District Ane D. Deister General Manager El Dorado Irrigation District kf ~ Associate General Manager Orange County Water District teve Director ~7i;:;:a~ Agencies Rex Hime President and Chief Executive Officer California Business Properties Association ~ c-4~ Luana Kiger Special Assistant to State Conservationist Natmal Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture ~-· KeitilLeWing~ ~ Manager Fallbrook Public Utility District Manager, Title XVI Water Recycling Program Office of Program & Policy Services U.S. Bureau of Reclamation =nu z;;ua < Deputy Executive Director California Building Standards Commission Chair, Board of Directors Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Dr. Karen Furst I Health Officer San Jo ~uin County Earle Hartling Water Recycling Coordinator Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Kefthlsreal Manager Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency Denise L. Kruger Vice President, Customer Service Region II Southern California Water Co any GaryR.Lync Vice Preside W ter Quali Park Water Co y LO~ ansour M. Nasser Water Utility Manager San Jose Municipal Water System City of San Jose --CL, Tim Ramirez \ Assistant Secretary, Water Policy and Science The Resomces Agency Director, Public Policy and Forecasting California Department of Food and Agriculture Frances Spivy-We Executive Director Mono Lake Committee William T. Vanwagoner Water Recycling Liaison Department of Water and Power City of Los Angeles ~?<U/6 2002-2003 President W ateReuse Association, California Section Government Affairs Manager· Chevron Products Company Williamsteele Area Manager U.S. Bureau of Reclamation \ ... ~;Zil;v Mun Watson Revolting Grandmas 4:7~~.uJ~ David R. WIDiams Director, Wastewater Deparbnent East Bay Municipal Utility District ~Llk:J-----~Wright Director California Bay-Delta Authority Table Ot Contents Recycled Water Task Force Membership List ................................................................................................... v Recycled Water Task Force Workgroup Membership List ............................................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Recycled Water Task Force ........................................................................................................... 2 Focus of Task Force ....................................................................................................................... 3 Workgroups .................................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 Role and Potential of Water Recycling .......................................................................................... 5 Recycled Water Use in California .................................................................................................. 5 Water Recycling Fundamentals ..................................................................................................... 7 Water Recycling Potential ... ................................................................. ...................... .. .. ........... .. . 12 Chapter 3 Legal and Regulatory Framework for Water Recycling ............................................................... 17 Chapter 4 Issue Areas and Key Recommendations . ... ...... ....... ...... ..... .. ..................... ............... .............. .. ... 19 1. Funding for Water Recycling ................................................................................................... 20 2. Public Dialogue/Public Outreach ............................................................................................. 21 3. Plumbing Code/Cross-Connection Control ............................................................................. 38 4. Regulations and Permitting ...................................................................................................... 41 5. Economics of Water Recycling ................................................................................................ 47 6. Science and Health/Indirect Potable Reuse ............................................................................ 50 Chapter 5 Additional Important Recommendations ...................................................................................... 53 1. Funding for Water Recycling ................................................................................................... 53 2. Public Dialogue! Public Outreach ............................................................................................. 56 3. Plumbing Code/Cross-Connection Control ............................................................................. 56 4. Regulations and Permitting ...................................................................................................... 58 5. Economics of Water Recycling ................................................................................................ 60 6. Science and Health/Indirect Potable Reuse ............................................................................ 61 Chapter 6 Summary and Implementation ..................................................................................................... 63 APPENDICES Appendix A. Assembly Bill No. 331 .............................................................................................................. A1 Appendix B. Memorandum of Agreement Between OHS and SWRCB on Use of Reclaimed Water ......... 81 Appendix C. Compendium of State Laws Regarding Water Recycling ....................................................... C1 Appendix D. Proposed California Version of Appendix J of the Uniform Plumbing Code ........................... 01 Appendix E. Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................... E1 Appendix F. Glossary ........ : .......................................................................................................................... F1 Appendix G. Public Comments ..................................................................................................................... G1 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Examples of Minimum Treatment Levels to Protect Public Health ............................................... 9 Table 2. Estimated Existing and Projected Potential Use of Recycled Water in California ...................... 14 Table 3. Total Capital Cost Estimates to Augment Recycled Water Supplies ........................................... 15 Table 4. Task Force Summary Recommendations .................................................................................... 65 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Recycled Water Use in California for 1970 to 2002 ...................................................................... 6 Figure 2. Types of Recycled Water Use in California (SWRCB, 2000) ........................................................ 7 Figure 3. Direct and Indirect Recycled Water Use ....................................................................................... 11 Figure 4. Projection of Recycled Water Deliveries in California through 2030 ........................................... 14 Figure 5. Cumulative Capital Investment in Water Recycling through 2030 in California .......................... 16 iv Rec~ded Water Task force Membership List TASK FORCE CHAIR TASK FORCE CO-VICE CHAIR TASK FORCE CO-VICE CHAIR Takashi Asano Rich Atwater Kirk Bone Jerry D. Brown Dan Carlson Bob S. Castle Herman C. Collins Ane D. Deister Gary Erbeck ~William R. Everest Kathy Fletcher Karen Furst Steve Hall Earle Hartling RexS. Hime Keith Israel Luana Kiger Denise L. Kruger Keith Lewinger Gary R. Lynch Rick Martin Darryl G. Miller Tom Morrison Mansour M. Nasser Phillip J. Pace Tim Ramirez Steve Shaffer R.K. Spackman Frances Spivy-Weber William Steele William T. Vanwagoner Muriel Watson Bob Whitley David Williams' -P.. John Withers Patrick Wright Marguerite Young • Facilitator Richard Katz, State Water Resources Control Board Jonas Minton, California Department of Water Resources David P. Spath, California Department of Health Services University of California at Davis Inland Empire Utilities Agency Parker Development Company Contra Costa Water District City of Santa Rosa Utilities Department Marin Municipal Water District Collins Strategic Group El Dorado Irrigation District County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Orange County Water District California Environmental Protection Agency San Joaquin County Association of California Water Agencies Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County California Business Properties Association Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service Southern California Water Company San Diego County Water Authority Park Water Company U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Central Basin and Wes! Basin Municipal Water Districts California Building Standards Commission City of San Jose Metropolitan Water District of Southern California The Resources Agency California Department of Food and Agriculture Chevron Products Company Mono Lake Committee U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Southern California Area Office City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Revolting Grandmas WateReuse Association, California Section East Bay Municipal Utility District Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board California Bay-Delta Authority Clean Water Action and Clean Water Fund Eric Schockman, University of Southern California ' Replaced Lau1a Johnson of East Bay Municipal Utility District slatting July 2002. v Rec~cled Water Task Force Stafi= Fawzi Karajeh, Ph.D. Executive Officer, Recycled Water Task Force and Chief of Water Recycling and Desalination Branch Office of Water Use Efficiency California Department of Water Resources Richard A. Mills, P .E. California State Water Resources Control Board Fethi BenJemaa, Ph.D. Water Recycling and Desalination Branch Office of Water Use Efficiency California Department of Water Resources Nancy King, P.E. Water Recycling and Desalination Branch Office of Water Use Efficiency California Department of Water Resources In collaboration with Diana Robles, P .E. Chief, Office of Water Recycling California State Water Resources Control Board Bob Hultquist, P .E. Chief, Drinking Water Technical Operations Section Drinking Water Technical Program Branch California Department of Health Services Acknowledgments: Thanks are due to all members of the Task Force and its workgroups for their hard work to fulfill the Task Force objectives. The efforts of DWR, SWRCB, and OHS support staff and their organizational and administrative assistance to the Task Force are greatly appreciated. Special thanks are extended to Dr. Eric Schockman for facilitating the Task Force meetings and to Ms. Luana Kiger, former Chief of DWR Office of Water Use Efficiency, for her input and effort in forming and launching this Task Force. vi 1 .i --- Rec~cled Water Task Force Workgroup Membership List Science and Health /Indirect Potable Reuse Workgroup CHAIR CO-CHAIR Dick Carlson Gary Erbeck _..., Bill Everest Peter Fox Karen Furst Steve Goodbred Earle Hartling Bob Hultquist F awzi Karajeh Denise Kruger Keith Lewinger Gary Lynch Rich Nagel Mansour Nasser Hoover Ng Tom Richardson Diana Robles Jim Setmire Walter Swain Bill Vanwagoner Muriel Watson _. Mike Wehner Ron Young Takashi Asano, University of California at Davis Dave Spath, California Department of Health Services San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Department of Environmental Health Orange County Water District Arizona State University San Joaquin County Public Health Services U.S. Geological Survey Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County California Department of Health Services California Department of Water Resources Southern California Water Company San Diego County Water Authority Park Water Company West and Central Basin Municipal Water District San Jose Municipal Water System Water Replenishment District of Southern California RMC -Raines, Melton and Carella, Inc. California State Water Resources Control Board U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Geological Survey City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Revolting Grandmas Orange County Water District Elsinor Valley Municipal Water District vii Plumbing Code/Cross-Connection Control Workgroup CHAIR Bob Hultquist, California Department of Health Services CO-CHAIR Bob Castle, Marin M.unicipal Water District Dick Carlson San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Rex Hime Fawzi Karajeh Keith Lewinger Cheryl Munoz Stuart Posselt Bahrnan Sheikh Jose Vergara California Business Properties Association California Department of Water Resources San Diego County Water Authority San Francisco Public Utilities Commission California Building Standards Commission Water Reuse Consultant Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Public Information, Education and Outreach Workgroup viii CHAIR Jonas Minton, California Department of Water Resources CO-CHAIR Herman Collins, Collins Strategic Group Suzanne Arena Kirk Bone Dan Carlson Ane Deister -+ Bill Everest Earle Hartling Lois Humphreys Keith Israel Michael Stanley-Jones Fawzi Karajeh Nancy King Maria G. Mariscal John T. Morris John Plummer Robert M. Reed Katie Shulte Joung _... Marilyn Smith Frances Spivy-Weber Lori Steere Bill Vanwagoner Al Vargas Muriel Watson Marguerite Young San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Parker Development Company City of Santa Rosa Utilities Department El Dorado Irrigation District Orange County Water District Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Leucadia County Water District Monterey Region Water Pollution Control Agency Clean Water Fund and Environmental Justice Coalition for Water California Department of Water Resources California Department of Water Resources San Diego County Water Authority Morris Water Resources Consultants Friends of Lake Merced Boyle Engineering Corporation Governor's Office of Planning & Research Irvine Ranch Water District Mono Lake Committee East Bay Municipal Utilities District City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power California Department of Food and Agriculture Revolting Grandmas Clean Water Action and Clean Water Fund ---------- Regulations and PermittingWorkgroup CHAIR CO-CHAIR Rich Atwater Kirk Bone Bob Castle Gary Erbeck -+ Virginia Grebbien Rex Hime Fawzi Karajeh Cindy Megerdigian ~ Darryl Miller Richard A. Mills John Morris Art O'Brien Rod Spackman Jeff Stone ~ John Withers Kathy Fletcher, California Environmental Protection Agency Jerry Brown, Contra Costa Water District Inland Empire Utilities Agency Parker Development Company Marin Municipal Water District Department of Environmental Health Orange County Water District California Business Properties Association California Department of Water Resources El Dorado Irrigation District Central and West Basin Municipal Water Districts California State Water Resources Control Board Morris Water Resources Consultants City of Roseville Chevron Products Company California Department of Health Services Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Funding/CALFED Coordination Workgroup CHAIR CO-CHAIR Fethi BenJemaa Martha Davis Tom Gohring Steve Hall Rex Hime Bill Jacoby Fawzi Karajeh Luana Kiger Laurie Luke John Morris Cheryl Munoz Melanie Richardson Rod Spackman Frances Spivy-Weber William Steele Bob Whitley Marguerite Young Patrick Wright, California Bay-Delta Authority Diana Robles, California State Water Resources Control Board California Department of Water Resources Inland Empire Utilities Agency California Bay-Delta Authority Association of California Water Agencies California Business Properties Association San Diego County Water Authority California Department of Water Resources USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service California Bay-Delta Authority Morris Water Resources Consultants San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Santa Clara Valley Water District Chevron Products Company Mono Lake Committee The Bureau of Reclamation WateReuse Association Clean Water Action and Clean Water Fund ix Economics Workgroup x CHAIR John Morris, Morris Water Resources Consultants co-CHAIR Nancy Lee, California State Water Resources Control Board Rich Atwater Inland Empire Utilities Agency Fethi BenJemaa Jerry Brown Martha Davis Ray Hoagland Bill Jacoby Fawzi Karajeh Ronald B. Linsky Richard A. Mills Mark Tettemer David R. Williams California Department of Water Resources Contra Costa Water District Inland Empire Utilities Agency California Department of Water Resources San Diego County Water Authority California Department of Water Resources National Water Research Institute California State Water Resources Control Board Central and West Basin Municipal Water Districts East Bay Municipal Utility District Executive Summ ar~ To meet the 11eeds of Ca/(fornin 's projected pop11/mio11of52 111i//io11 i11 the year 2030. the Swte's water s11pply 11111sr be a11g111e11ted {//Id made 111ore effic ient. \\!m er conservation. recycling. desalinarion . trading al/{/ storage of s111face and groundwarer are the c01npo- 11e111s that will s11ccessf11//y 111wwge rhe Srare 's m·era// 11·mer supply. Since th e 1890s. Californians ha\'e been reusing 1111111icipa/ wasre11'(1ter for agric11/r11re and.farm i rriga tio11. By rhe early 1900s. co111m1111iries began usi11 g re cvc/ed war er ( rreared wasrewarer) for landscape irrigation. C11rrenrly. California is recycling appmxi111arely 500.000 acre }eer of 1rnrer per year for \'(lrio11s uses. Cn/(f'omia has the por e111ia/ ro re cycle up to /.5 111illio11 acre-Jeer per yea r ofwarer by rhe yea r 2030. This could.fi·ee 11pfres lmar er supplies ro meer approxi111arely 30 perc e111of1he household wwer needs associmed 11 •irh projec1ed puµ11/arion groll'th. Holl'eve1: 10 achieve 1h(lf po1e11 tial. Cal(fornians 11·i// ha1 ·e 10 in vest nearly$// billion (approxi11w1ely $./00 111illion 011111wlly)for wldi1io11a/ i11fras1mc11tre 10 pmr/111·c and de/i1·er 1he recycled 1rn1ei: Tht• 11111.\'t co1111111111recyclctl11 ·t1tl'r 11\'C'\' i11c/11tlc: I I I land\l·ape irrig01io11 l!f hil!h11 ·t l\" 1nedi - w1s. golf c1111r.1es. par/...1. 111ul .1choolnml.1: (:!I i11t/11s1rial 11ses s uch as p1111 ·er su11w11 cuol- i11.~ /I'll ,·1:·., ui/ 1t./i11u :1 /,"jft 1 /~ ,·,/ 11 <1/<1, •di /1d ,/_1 l i11.~. 1«_1 l /u/ //UU/J<l/JLI I""' t.1;,i11 i.;. 11nd /111111< lri<•.\: 111 ul ( 3 I 11g rw 11Ir11 r11 / 11 "'' '11 t'li "·' 11'1'1 i:11 f/1111 o/"111·od11l'e. /'II s fl 1 r1'.1 / u r 1111i11111 / feed, and 1111rsery p/a11r 11rod11 c rs. Rece11r ly. recycled 1rnter use has expa11ded IO ujjic e /111i /d i11 gsjiH 111ile1 .f711shi11g. In coastal areas. excessii·<' gro11n d11 ·r11 er p1111111i11g re.rn/1s in semrmer illlms io11. 11 ·/tich c:o 111<11ni11(//e.1 1h e uq11ijers 1rirlt so/1 11 ·are1: R ecycll'cl 11 •111er is used 10 recharge 1he a11u1fen <don g the coast. This c reates a hnlra11/i c barrier write in/loll' ofsemrnte1: r/111s prorccring 1h e quo/i1y a11d replenis hing th e Sllflply (~j'1h e in/a11d gro undware 1: Gm111uhrmer <u111(fers hm·e heen recharged 11·ith recycled 11·a1er in Califnmia sin ce rh e 1960s. Because gro1111d1rmer m111(fers se1Te as parable 11·mer supply basins. grou11d 11'(1ter recharg e. i11c/udi11g sea11 ·a1er illlrusion barriers. is considered an indirect powhle reuse. Th e Deparr- 111e111 of Health Sen•ices (D HS ! requires adl'(111ced trear111e111 of recycled 11 ·mcr befnre iris u ied ro rechc11g e gro111u/1r(lf er aquifers. These rrem111e111 require111ems are more re srricrii ·e r/Ja11the1ypicol req11ire111emsfor di.1·c/u11:~e.1 10 i11/n11d s 111face o r coaswl 1rar e rs. xi Serrano Counuy C lub. irrigated with rec ycled waler 1n El Dorado Hills, CA . Over 125 golf courses use recycled water 1n Ca li fornia Rec ycled water 1s used for toi let and urinal flush ing on the recently constructed Smo th Barney building on Irvine. CA ·-_...... . .. !!.;.....:.:.,. ~· .. ~~ . rtrm¥it EttV...m ..... rtotv:_> ,w.;~~~-1 Al the fi nal meetin g of the Recycled Water Task Force, Thomas H annigan (I.), D irector of DWR, listens 10 Assemblymember Jackie Goldberg , author o f AB 331, which mandated creahon of the Task Force. lisplaying interagency cooperation, the Ta sk 'orce was led by (from left) David Spath OHS), Eric Schockman (facilitator), Richard :atz (SWRCB), Jonas Mini on (DWR). nd Fawzi Karajeh (DWR). Assembly Bill No. 331 was passed by the Califomia Legislature, and s igned into Law by Gover- nor Gra y Da vis on October 7, 200 1. Th e bill req 11ired th e crea tion of th e 2002 R ecycled Wat er Task Force (Ta sk Force) to identify constraints, i1npedimencs, and opportunities for th e in- creased use of re cycled water and report to the Legislature by July J, 2003. Although water recycling includes treatm ent of a broad ran ge of waste water sources, th e Ta sk Force decided to focus 011 th e plann ed reus e of treated municipal wastewater; specifically, the financial/eco- nomic, re g ulatory, and social iss ues chat rypica lly arise in water recycling projects. Representatives of federal, State, and local a gen c ies, private entities, environmental orga- nizations, univers ities, con cerned individ11als and public-inte rest g ro ups were appointed to th e 40-member Task Force in April 2002. Th e Ta sk Force in cludes experts in the field of water re cycling, including th ose involved in the production and use of recycled water; public h ealth officials, world-renowned researchers, environmental o rgan i zations, and th e public. The Ta sk Force es tablished committ ees (w o rkgroup s) co focus on specific topics of concern and produce reports that se111ed as a basis of Task F orce decision-makin g. Th e Departm ent of Wat e r R esou rces (DWR), the State Wat e r Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and th e DHS provided technica l assistance co th e Ta sk Fo rce and its workgroups. DHS' regulations prescribe th e level of treatment necessary for th e va rious uses of recycled water. In general, the public has accepted these regulation s as being adequate for protection of public health. There are s uccessfu l indirect potable reus e projects in volving g roundwater recharg e in California and new projects cominue to be proposed. Howeve1; in some in- stances, the public has not been receptive to the co ncept of u s in g recycled water to recharg e groundwater basin s that serve as d rinkin g water s upply sources. Some indirect potable reuse proposals have hPen misr hnmrrf'rized by images of recycled warer being f ed direcrly inro drinking water pipeline syst ems. Th e Task Force fo und the n eed to in volve the public much earlier in the decision-making pro cess for projects, to make th e process much more transparent and to provide facts ea rly 011 in project planning . Th e refore, the Ta sk Force devoted considerable attention co issues surrounding public health and th e need for in c reased education and outreach re lated co th e facts and scientific research about re cycled water. Other critical issues include th e lack of lo cal funding for ( 1) water recycling infrast ruc ture, (2) research on emerg ing co ntaminants, and ( 3) public health concerns. Th ese have also been identified as impediment s to in crea sed wate r re cycling s tatewide. A financial in centive for tlze local development of water re cycling projects is an effective cool f or the co n struction of wa ter re cycling facilities and infras tructure, as evidenced by th e SWRCB s Propositions 13 and 50 lo an and gran t prog rams. Th e refore, the need for additional State fundin g to provide lo ca l water recyclin g fundin g a ss istan ce is also reflected in th e recommendations. Th e Task Fo rce identified and adopted 26 issues with re spective recommendations to ad- dress obstacles, impedim ents. a nd opportunities for Califo rnia to increase its recycled xii --- water usage. Recommendations associated with thirteen of these issues were adopted as key recommendations deserving of more immediate attention. The 26 issues and a sum- mary of the recommendations follow. The issues have been numbered as shown in paren- theses to correspond to their numbers assigned in Chapters 4, 5, and 6 of the report. Key Issues and Recommendations Summary: Funding/or Water Recycling Projects (1.1) -State funding for water reuse/recycling facili- ties and infrastructure should be increased beyond Proposition 50 and other current sources. Community value-based Decision-making Model/or Project Planning (2.1) -Local agen- cies should engage the public in an active dialogue and participation using a community value-based decision-making model in planning water recycling projects. Public partici- pation activities should go beyond the minimum requirements of State and federal envi- ronmental laws, perhaps being reinforced by State funding agencies requiring a compre- hensive public participation process as a condition for receiving State funds. Leadership support for water recycling (2.2) -State government should take a leader- ship role in encouraging recycled water use and improve consistency of policy within branches of State government. Local agencies should create well-defined recycled water ordinances. Local regulatory agencies should effectively enforce these ordinances. The State should convene an independent statewide review panel on indirect potable reuse to ensure adequate health and safety assurance for California residents. Educational Curriculum (2.3) -The State should develop comprehensive education cur- ricula for public schools; and institutions of higher education should incorporate re- Lyded Willer ~ducution imu tlteir currit•ulu. Guvemmentul wtd ncmgoventmental organi- zations should enhance their existing public education programs. State-sponsored media campaign (2.4) -The State should develop a water issues infor- mation program, including water recycling, for radio, television, print, and other media. Uniform Plumbing Code Appendix J (3.1) -The State should revise Appendix J of the Uniform Plumbing Code, which addresses plumbing within buildings with both potable and recycled water systems, and adopt a California version that will be enforceable in this State. DHS Guidance on Cross-connection Control (3.2) -The Department of Health Services should prepare guidance that would clarify the intent and applicability of Title 22, Article 5 of the California Code of Regulations pertaining to dual plumbed systems and amend this article to be consisient with requirements included in a California version of Appen- dix J that the Task Force is recommending to be adopted. xiii Health and Safety Regulation (4.1) -The Department of Health Services should involve stakeholders in a review of various factors to identify any needs. for enhancing existing local and State health regulation associated with the use of recycled water. Incidental Runoff (4.2) -The State should investigate, within the current legal frame- work, alternative approaches to achieve more consistent and less burdensome regulatory mechanisms affecting incidental runoff of recycled water from use sites. Uniform Interpretation of State Standards ( 4.3) -The State should create uniform inter- pretation of State standards in State and local regulatory programs by taking specific steps recommended by the Task Force, for example, appointing an ombudsman in the State Water Resources Control Board to oversee uniformity within the SWRCB and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards. Water Softeners (4.4) -The Legislature should amend the Health and Safety Code Sec- tions 116775 through 116795 to reduce the restrictions on local ability to impose bans on, or more stringent standards for, residential water softeners. Within the current legal pro- visions on water softeners, local agencies should consider publicity campaigns to educate consumers regarding the impact of self-regenerative water softeners. Uniform Analytical Method/or Economic Analyses (5.1)-A uniform and economically valid procedural framework should be developed to determine the economic benefits and costs of water recycling projects for use by local, State, and federal agencies. Guida.nee should be developed to conduct economic feasibility analyses. incorporating nonmarket values to the extent possible. Appropriate benchmarks for comparing incremental costs of developing re- cycled water with the cost of developing an equivalent amount through alternative measures. An advisory team should be created by the Department of Water Resources, the State Water Resources Control Board. and the Department of Health Services to assist these tasks. Research Funding (6.1) -The State should expand funding sources to include sustainable State funding for research on recycled water issues. University Academic Program for Water Recycling (6.2) -The State should encourage an integrated academic program on one or more campuses for water recycling research and education, such as through State research funding. Additional Important Issues and Recommendations Summary: Funding Coordination (1.2) -A revised funding procedure should be developed to pro- vide local agencies with assistance in potential State andfederalfunding opportunities. A Water Recycling Coordination Committee should be established to work with funding agen- cies, streamlining project selection within individual agencies while ensuring an open process, peer review, and public review. xiv Regional Planning Criterion (1.3) -State funding agencies should make better use of existing regional planning studies to determine the funding priority of projects. This pro- cess would not exclude projects from funding where regional plans do not exist. Funding Information Outreach (1.4)-Funding agencies shouldpublicizefunding avail- ability through workshops, conferences, and the Internet. Department of Water Resources Technical Assistance (1.5) -Funding sources should be expanded to include sustainable State funding for DWR 's technical assistance and research, including flexibility to work on local and regional planning, emerging issues, and new technology. Project Performance Analysis ( 1.6) -Resources should be provided to funding agencies to perform comprehensive analysis of the performance of existing recycled water projects in terms of costs and benefits and recycled water deliveries. An estimate should be per- formed of future benefits potentially resulting from future investments. Recycled Water Symbol Code Change (3.3)-The Department of Housing and Community Development should submit a code change to remove the requirement for the skull and crossbones symbol in Sections 601.2.2 and 601.2.3 of the California Plumbing Code. Stakeholder Review of Proposed Cross-connection Control Regulations (3.4) -Stake- holders are encouraged to review Department of Health Services draft changes to Title 17 of the Code of Regulations pertaining to cross-connections between potable and nonpotable water systems. Cross-connection Risk Assessment (3.5) -The Department of Health Services should sup- port a thorough assessment of the risk associated with cross-connections between disin- f ecled tet1ia1y >'et.'Y(.:leJ watu and potable waret: Permitting Procedures (4.5) -Various measures should be conducted to improve the ad- ministration and compliance with local and State permits, including providing Depart- ment of Health Services guidance, dissemination of information by the Association of Cali- fornia Water Agencies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, and State and local tax incentives to offset costs of compliance with regulations. Source Control (4.6) -Local agencies should maintain strong source control programs and increase public awareness of their importance in reducing pollution and ensuring a safe recycled water supply. Economic Analyses (5.2) -Local agencies are encouraged to perform economic analyses in addition to financial analyses for water recycling projects to provide transparency re- garding the true costs and benefits of projects. State and federal agencies should require economic and financial feasibility as two funding criteria in their funding programs. xv <irk Bone signs the Ta sk Force report, vi tnessed by Fawzi Kar ajeh (1.) and II Va rgas (r.). Stat ewide Sc ience-based Pa11 e/ on Indirect Potable R e u se (6.3) -As required by AB 33 1. th e Task Force reviewed rh e 1996 report of rh e Ca lifom ia l ndirecJ Potable Re use Commir- tee and o r her relar ed adviso1y pane l reporr s and concluded char reconven ing this commit- tee would nor b e worthwhile at this time. D e tail s concernin g th e recommendari ons are contained in th e report. Th e Task Force intends for 1his reporl 10 be used as a working 1001 to guide the Legisla- ture, State governmenr , public agencies, th e public and all water recycling s takeho lders towa rds rhe safe an d s uccessful expan s ion of recycled war er u se lO he lp meer the Stare 's future warer supply needs. xv i I I 1 While the Task Force findings are to be presented in a report to the Legislature, the recom- mendations are not restricted to legislative actions or statutory changes. Many can be implemented by State or local agencies without further legislative authorization or man- date. Some recommendations draw upon the experience of many agencies and provide advice that can be used as a toolbox for communities to improve their planning for re- cycled water projects. We give our sincerest thanks for the assistance of the Department of Water Resources, the State Water Resources Control Board, and the Department of Health Services. In addition to input from industry and government, these recommendations benefited tre- mendously from the input of the public. Their input helped inform the Task Forces think· ing and the report as a whole. We thank all those who so generously contributed their time and expertise to our repon. We, the Recycled Water Task Force, appreciate the opportunity to transmit this report to you. SOUTHER N CALIFORNlA ALLIANCC Cf PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WOO KS In this issue ... Monthly Update DECEMBER 2003 • • A Message from the Executive Director ... • Upcoming Meetings • Water Issues • Air Quality • Biosolids • Collection Systems • Non Sequitur ~·A ·.Messa"'.e /froni~fhe'f Executive . Director... . · . . ·· When we last talked with Ken Nelsen of Lake Arrowhead Community Services District on Fr iday , October 24 , he had been notified by the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) that they were shutting off power to the mountain resort areas. The step was prudent: going into that weekend , humidity was low and high winds were forecast. An arson fire (Grand Prix) was already burning down the mountain in Fontana; tires were also raging in San Diego, Los Angeles and Ventura counties . Unfortunate ly , SCE's action wouldn't stop the real tire danger -the arsonist who would drive up Old Waterman Road -sometime around 10:00 a.m. the next morning. Before it was over, the Old Fire would claim the lives of eight people , as well as 90,000 acres and $42 million in property. But on that Friday, Ken just knew that the Emergency Plan -that he had providentially just finished a few months earlier -was going to get its , well , baptism by fire. Between its water and wastewater functions, the District has 4 treatment plants and 38 pump stations . All of the wastewater stations have standby power -diesel engine generators . Most of the water stations also had backup , but Ken i!].f§.], ,J l,f .i: t::r4; I ,f .~ SCAP Holiday Luncheon: Wayne Nastri wil l attend the luncheon to help us ce lebrate th e Biosolids EMS Certifications for OCSD and the City of Los Angeles . The luncheon will be held Tuesday, December 16 at El N igue l Country Club. The San C lemente High School Madriga l S i ngers wi ll again perform . Be sure to send your RSVPs this week! Board of Directors: Tuesday, December 16, 9:30-11 :30 a .m., El Niguel Country Club, Laguna Niguel. Air Quality Committee: Tuesday, January 13, 10:00 a .m. -Noon , Los Angeles County j Sanitation Districts , Whittier. needed 12 more to completely power his treatment plants and main pumping facil ities . He would end up looking as far afield as Long Beach to find them . When the fire started , Highway 18, the main artery into Lake Arrowhead , was closed and the process of evacuating the mountain began . For Ken, this would be the point where he would say good-bye to his personnel and his facilities. Ken , you see , is also a volunteer firefighter tor the Crest Forest Fire District, and he was called to duty. .-------------------1 For the next 13 days, seven District employees would stay and man 42 different locations -keeping generators topped off with diesel , operating facilities and generally keeping everything operating. They fell back once -when the fire jumped a ridgeline and neared a wate r treatment facility, they moved to the wastewater plant. But in that capricious way that fires sometime move, most of ~ Lake Arrowhead was spared , and the District ended up losing one pump station The Old and the Grand Pr ix fires approach in Rim Forest. Lake Arrowhead While Ken says that the Emergency Plan operated as well as he had hoped , it was still only a plan -without those seven employees, several areas would have been without water for firefighting and prevention efforts . Some important things also went their way: both cell phones and radios worked well , even though a couple of cell towers were destroyed. They were also able to tap into diesel supplies at a county storage yard and through the supply chain that came up for the firefighters . Something to think about: some kind of system has got to be worked out with police/CHP units so that water/wastewater personnel can get to agency facilities in an emergency. More employees would have been able to work (especially after the fires were out) had they been allowed back into the area ; however, the CHP wouldn't accept District ID cards . Ideally , twelve employees were needed to do the work that the seven accomplished . As I noted previously, this is just one of the storie s that played out during the fires in October, and we know that many of them didn't end so well. This spring , after everyone has had a chance to address their immediate concerns , SCAP will host a workshop/debriefing on the lessons that have been learned from this disaster. On a different subject, I would like to pass on some observations from the "Regulatory Roundtable" meetings that were held with Nancy Sutley, Board Member for the State Water Resources Control Board , and Jane Carney, Board Member from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. These two women spent several hours listening to our issues , asking questions and offering their viewpoints on a wide range of issues . They spoke candidly and had done the i r homework: they knew and understood many of the finer technical details of the issues. In a few areas , they felt we had a valid point and agreed to look into those further, or asked us to get them more information . For those areas where they had an opposing viewpoint, they made their point with facts , not rhetoric . They learned about us, and we about them. Because of the effort that several of our SCAP members went to (thank you Las Virgenes, Burbank, Los Angeles , LACSD, Eastern , Encina), Nancy Sutley was given a pictorial tour of the vastly different surface waters of SoCal -from rural Malibu Creek to the concrete channels of the LA River and down to the lagoons of north San Diego County . Similarly, Jane Carney is now intimately acquainted with our concerns about keeping diesel engines and what they mean to every facet of wastewater operations -many of which she didn't realize affect us . We are no longer strangers. These meetings will continue and we hope that your agency can send a representative to one . Your personal stories of grappling with these regu lations -and the often unintended consequences of them -are important for these Board members to hear. After meeting with Nancy and Jane, we are confident that they will consider t his information as they go forward with policy decisions. I'd also like to thank Chuck Rogers and Carolyn Green of the City of Thousand Oaks and John Mundy and Jeff Reinhardt of the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District for writing support letters and for Carolyn and John trekking to Sacramento to speak before the GARB on the Stationary Engine ATCM Regulations. Thanks also to Ken Nelson of Lake Arrowhead (he almost made it up there!) and Dan Gallagher of the Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority for submitting comments. Each of these agencies worked with the Air Quality Committee and SCAP staff for many hours pulling this together. I am also grateful to Air Quality Committee Chair Dan McGivney for his leadership on this issue , and Carol Kaufman of Metropolitan Water District, whose tremendous logic and focus kept us on target. And I can never say enough about the way Mary Jane Foley can navigate the halls of Sacramento and open doors that we didn 't even know were there . This issue is not over. On December 11, the GARB will address this issue again, and we expect the opposition to have used the last month to lobby against interruptible contracts. This is one more assault against diesel engines , and until they make reliable and powerful fuel cell engines , we will be reminding every elected official we can of how important they are to our operations . Finally, I hope that I will be able to see all of you at our Holiday Luncheon on the 16th. If you can't make it , know that my staff and I send our warmest regards and appreciation for your efforts. We do consider it an honor to work with the men and women of our industry , and we never forget who provides us with a level of clean water that is the envy of the world. Thankfully yours, Ray Miller SCAP .Board Meets on ,Deeember 16 .' . , , · .. , ... ·~, _, We would like to thank the City of Thousand Oaks and Las Virgenes Municipal Water District for sending Carolyn Green and John Mundy up to Sacramento to provide their testimony to the Board . Ken Nelson of Lake Arrowhead spent considerable time getting ready to attend also ; however, the last minute uncertainty about the hearing precluded his ability to attend . Thanks to Ken and Dan Gallagher of Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation District for submitting written comments . Reg u latory Roundtable : Air Comm ittee Meets w ith J ane C arne y On November 24 , members of the Air Quality Committee met with South Coast Air Quality Committee Chair Contact Info · A ir Chai r: Dan McG ivney- dmcgivney@emwd .org Biosolids Chai r -Diane Gilbert - d x g@san.lacity.org Wate r Chair -Roger Turner - turner@emwd.org Collecti ons Committee Chair - Nick Arhontes - na r hontes@ocsd.com Management Governing Board member Jane W . Carney. Ms. Carney was appointed in March 2000 by the Senate's Rules Committee and has over 24 years of e x perience in corporate and business law. She is a partner of the Riverside law firm of Carney & Delany , LLP and is a graduate of the School of Law at Univers ity of California , Davis , where she was elected to Order of the Coif. Carney has lived in Riverside since 1977, where she has been active in a wide variety of community activities. The Committee and Ms. Carney discussed the diesel equipment regulations (how they play a major role in the operation of essential public services), biosolids disposal (narrowing d i sposal alternatives , how AQMD staff worked well with us on this regulation ), c ross media impacts (how regulating the poll utants in the a i r is i ncreasing pollu tants to the sewer}, environmental justice/cumulative impacts/precautionary principle (how this is making it more d ifficult than ever to site essential public s ervices li ke wastewater plants), and re gulations on emissions from gas and liquid fueled engines (because of the nature of digester gas , they are unable to meet concentration-based limits and need mass-based limits). The meeti ng was informative and wide-ranging , and Ms . Carney has a ready understanding of the issues. She suggested that the "Essential Public Services" nature of what we do be emphasized more often in our commentary to the Board . She also noted that certain public services , like pollution control, are societal burdens the costs for which should be distributed equally among societal members. CAR S Works hop on Prop osed Po rtabl e Eng i ne ATCM Yie l ds Mixed Bag of Re su lt s CARS held a public workshop on the proposed ATCM to control parti culate matter from portable engines and revisions to the PERP regulation. An important change to the latest A TCM is a relaxation of the compliance dates for meeting fleet PM standards. Essentially now, the fleet requirements do not kick in until 2013, but need to be When we last talked with Ken Nelsen of Lake Arrowhead Community Services District on Friday, Octobe r 24 , he had been notified by the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) that they were shutting off power to the mountain resort areas . The step was prudent: going into that weekend, humidity was low and high winds were forecast. An arson fire (Grand Prix) was already burning down the mountain in Fontana; fires were also raging in San Diego , Los Angeles and Ventura counties. Unfortunately , SCE's action wouldn't stop the real fire danger -the arsonist who would drive up Old Waterman Road -sometime around 10:00 a.m . the next morning . Before it was over, the Old Fire would claim the lives of eight people, as well as 90,000 acres and $42 million in property . But on that Friday, Ken just knew that the Emergency Plan -that he had providentially just finished a few months earlier -was going to get its , well , baptism by fire . Between its water and wastewater functions , the District has 4 treatment plants and 38 pump stations . All of the wastewater stations have standby power -diesel eng ine generators. Most of the water stations also had backup , but Ken l!J.1q.1 .. u.r.1:t:t:n1.r.~ SCAP Holiday Luncheon: Way ne Nast ri will attend the luncheon to help us celebrate the B iosol ids EMS Certificati ons for OCSD and the City of Los Angeles . The luncheon wi ll be held Tuesday, December 16 at El Niguel Country Club. The San Clemente High School Madrigal S ingers will again perform . Be sure to send your RSVPs th is wee k! Board of Directors: Tuesday, December 16, 9:30-11 :30 a .m., El Niguel Country Club , Laguna Niguel. Air Quality Committee: Tuesday, January 13, 10:00 a .m. -Noon , Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts , Wh itt i er. needed 12 more to completely power h is treatment plants and mai n pumping fa cilities. He would end up looking as far afield as Long Beach to find them . When the fire started , Highway 18, the main artery into Lake Arrowhead , was closed and the process of evacuating the mountain began . For Ken , this would be the point where he would say good-bye to his personnel and his facilities . Ken , you see , is also a volunteer firefighter for the Crest Forest Fire District, and he was called to duty. The Old and the Grand Pr ix fires approach Lake Arrowhead For the next 13 days, seven District employees would stay and man 42 different locations -keeping generators topped off with diesel, operating facilities and generally keeping everything operating. They fell back once -when the fire jumped a ridgeline and neared a water treatment facility , they moved to the wastewater plant. But in that capricious way that fires sometime move, most of Lake Arrowhead was spared, and the District ended up losing one pump station in Rim Forest. While Ken says that the Emergency Plan operated as well as he had hoped, it was still only a plan -without those seven employees , several areas would have been w ithout water for firefighting and prevention efforts . Some important things also went their way: both cell phones and radios worked well, even though a couple of cell towers were destroyed. They were also able to tap into diesel supplies at a county storage yard and through the supply chain that came up for the firefighters . Something to think about: some kind of system has got to be worked out with police/CHP units so that water/wastewater personnel can get to agency facilities in an emergency. More employees would have been able to work (especially after the fires were out) had they been allowed back into the area ; however, the CHP wouldn't accept District ID cards . Ideally , twelve employees were needed to do the work that the seven accomplished . As I noted previously, this is just one of the stories that played out during the fires in October, and we know that many of them didn't end so well. This spring, after everyone has had a chance to address their immediate concerns , SCAP will host a workshop/debriefing on the lessons that have been learned from this disaster. On a different subject, I would like to pass on some observations from the "Regulatory Roundtable" meetings that were held with Nancy Sutley, Board Member for the State Water Resources Control Board , and Jane Carney, Board Member from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. These two women spent several hours listening to our issues, asking questions and offering their viewpoints on a wide range of issues. They spoke candidly and had done their homework: they knew and understood many of the finer technical details of the issues. In a few areas, they felt we had a valid point and agreed to look into those further, or asked us to get them more information . For those areas where they had an opposing viewpoint, they made their point with facts , not rhetoric. They learned about us, and we about them. Because of the effort that several of our SCAP members went to (thank you Las Virgenes , Burbank , Los Angeles , LACSD , Eastern, Encina), Nancy Sutley was given a pictorial tour of the vastly different surface waters of SoCal -from rural Malibu Creek to the concrete channels of the LA River and down to the lagoons of north San Diego County . Similarly , Jane Carney is now intimately acquainted with our concerns about keeping diesel engines and what t hey mean to every facet of wastewater operations -man y of which she didn't realize affect us. We are no longer strangers . These meetings will continue and we hope that your agency can send a representative to one. Your personal stories of grappling with these regulations -and the often unintended consequences of them -are important for these Board members to hear. After meeting with Nancy and Jane, we are confident that they will consider this information as they go forward with policy decisions. I'd also like to thank Chuck Rogers and Carolyn Green of the City of Thousand Oaks and John Mundy and Jeff Reinhardt of the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District for writing support letters and for Carolyn and John trekking to Sacramento to speak befo re the CARS on the Stationary Engine ATCM Regulations. Thanks also to Ken Nelson of Lake Arrowhead (he almost made it up there!) and Dan Gallagher of the Victor Va lley Wastewater Reclamation Authority for submitting comments . Each of these agencies worked with the Air Quality Committee and SCAP staff for many hours pulling this together. I am also grateful to Air Quality Committee Chair Dan McGivney for his leadership on this issue , and Carol Kaufman of Metropolitan Water District, whose tremendous logic and focus kept us on target. And I can never say enough about the way Mary Jane Foley can navigate the halls of Sacramento and open doors that we didn 't even know were there. This issue is not over. On December 11 , the CARS will address this issue agai n, and we expec t the opposition to have used th e last month to lobby a gainst inte rru ptible contracts. This is one mor e assault against dies el engines , and until th ey make reliable and powerful fuel cell engines , we will be reminding every elected official we can of how important they are to our operations . Finally, I hope that I will be able to see all of you at our Holiday Luncheon on the 16th. If y ou can't make it , know that my staff and I send our warmest regards and appreciation for your efforts. We do consider it an honor to work with the men and women of our industry, and we never forget who provides us with a leve l of clean water that is the envy of the world . Thankfully yours , Ray Miller SCAP .Boara ·Meets on .oeeember 16 .· · . · .... · ,'. The SCAP Board will meet to review the progress that has been made towards achieving the action items that were laid out at the Strategic Planning Meeting in June , and to make appointments to the Board due to retirements that have occurred. -A. ' .. <l•t· .. . , .. ,-:..:;.,-· -. . 1r -; ua 1 -. · .... ···<¥,"... -.. . . .' Air Board Hears Co mments on St ationary Engines Regulations, Delays Action The California Air Resources Board held a public hearing on the proposed state-wide regulation of stationary engines; however, they did not take action in view of Governor Schwarzenegger's Executive Order S-2-03 . The Order, which asks every state agency to " ... cease processing, pursuant to the California Administrative Procedure Act, any proposed regulatory action , including emergency regulations , for further review for a period not to exceed 180 days," was issued two days before the hearing and it was unclear up to noon on the day before whether or not the hearing would be held . Although the hearing was held , they did continue it to a yet-to-be-determined date. The environmental community and the CAPCOA (organization of regional air district administrators) requested that the operation of engines near schools be made more stringent. They were requesting no operation during school hours and activities within 1000 feet. Also, the environmental community wanted more "teeth " in the enforcement of the regulation . They believed that the regulation , as written, lacked sufficient punitive measures ; at least one board member agreed with them. The Air Quality Committee is concerned that if they are successful in limiting the operation of stationary engines , then there is an increased chance that they will be successful at similar limitations on portable engines. They also are against any fle xi bility for allowing diesel eng ines to be used for interruptible service contracts. Besides arguing the health issues surrounding that use , they stated that they believe that it sets a precedent that will be followed in other states. CAPCOA and the SCAQMD both stated that they had not had time to review the ISC language and reserved their comments for later. We would like to thank the City of Thousand Oaks and Las Virgenes Municipal Water District for sending Carolyn Green and John Mundy up to Sacramento to provide their testimony to the Board. Ken Nelson of Lake Arrowhead spent considerable time getting ready to attend also; however, the last minute uncertainty about the hearing precluded his ability to attend . Thanks to Ken and Dan Gallagher of Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation District for submitting written comments. Regu latory Roundtab le: Air Committee Meets w ith Jane Carney Committee Chair Contact Info · A ir Chair: Dan McGivney- dmcgivney@emwd.org Biosolids Chair -Diane Gilbert - dxg@san.lacity.org Water Chair -Roger Turner - turner@emwd .org Collections Committee Chair - Nick Arhontes - On November 24 , members of the Air Quality narhontes@ocsd.com Committee met with South Coast Air Quality Management Governi ng Boa rd member Jane W . Carney. Ms. Carney was appointed in March 2000 by the Senate's Rules Committee and has over 24 years of experience in corporate and business law . She is a partner of the Riverside law firm of Carney & Delany , LLP and is a graduate of the School of Law at University of California , Davis , where she was elected to Order of the Coif. Carney has lived in Riverside since 1977, where she has been active in a wide variety of community activities . The Comm ittee and Ms. Carney discussed the diesel equipment regulations (how they play a major role in the operation of essential public services), biosolids disposal (narrowing disposal alternatives , how AQMD staff worked well with us on this regulation), cross media impacts (how regulating the pollutants in the air is increasing pollutants to the sewer), environmental justice/cumulative impacts /precautionary principle (how this is making it more difficult than ever to site essential public services like wastewater plants), and regulations on emissions from gas and liquid fueled engines (because of the nature of digester gas , they are unable to meet concentration-based limits and need mass-based limits). The meeting was informative and wide-ranging, and Ms. Carney has a ready understanding of the issues. She suggested that the "Essential Public Services" nature of what we do be emphasized more often in our commentary to the Board . She also noted that certain public services , like pollution control , are societal burdens the costs for which should be distributed equal ly among societal members. CARS Wo rkshop on Pro posed Portable Eng in e ATCM Yields Mi xed Bag of Re sult s CARB held a public workshop on the proposed ATCM to control particulate matter from portable engines and revisions to the PERP regulation. An important change to the latest ATCM is a relaxation of the compliance dates for meeting fleet PM standards . Essentially now , the fleet requirements do not kick in until 2013, but need to be coordinated with the fleet turnover requirements (engines that must meet the most stringent standards) that must occur by 2010. The requirement for operation of portable engines near a school had also been relaxed from 1 ,000 feet to 300 feet, and only for engines ope rating more than 5 consecut ive days; eme rgency use appears to be unlimited . What is problematic though , are the new requirements that are phased in beginning in 2006 that require that only certain types of engines be allowed to operate within the specified distance of a school. This would require essential public services to allocate the newer parts of their fleets to these circumstances . Finally , the treatment of eng ines under emergency use is very limited. The newest version of the ATCM provides liberal use of "emergency only" engines . These engines are those that are designated only to emergency use and would lose this designation if used for any other purpose . Re g u la tory Ro u n dtable : Water Issu es C o mm ittee Me ets with N a n cy Sutle y State Water Resou rces Control Board Member Nancy Sutley met with the SCAP Water Issues Committee on Novembe r 18; approx imately 15 SCAP members attended . Ms . Sutley of El Cerrito served as the Deputy Secretary fo r Policy and Intergovernmental Relations at the California Environmental Protection Agency , having been appointed by Governor Davis in October 1999. From 1993 to 1999, Ms. Sutley worked at the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a Special Assistant to the U .S. EPA Administrator and Senior Policy Advisor to the Region 9 Administrator. She also served as the Policy Director for the National Independent Energy Producers and as an Industry Economist for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Ms. Sutley earned a BA degree from Cornell University , and a Master of Public Policy degree from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Issues that were addressed included the 303(d) List (need a transparent process so we can understand the bas is for the listing ; listings are be i ng used to ci rcumvent the Basin Planning process and increase permitting requirements without going through the water quality review process), Effluent Dependent Waters (EDWs encompass most of SoCal 's surface waters -how can this move forward), Biosolids (what is the future for Biosolids), and the Budget Crisis (can w e work on getting more effective monitoring requirements and new fund ing source for ambient monitoring). Ms. Sutley is well-info rmed and pragmatic. In those areas -such as the 303(d) listings - she was concerned that the State addresses the most important priorities first and to not chase things that don't provide much benefit. On the EDW issue, she suggested casting a wide net and inviting environmental groups to participate in a Public Advisory Group (PAG) format ; however, she noted that they are constrained by budget and a multitude of issues and may not have the resources to devote to the issue until right before it comes to the Board for a vote -and then most likely they are going to be opposed . With regards to budget issues, they are working closely with EPA to ensure that funding is being used appropriately; they are also anticipating that further budget cuts will be made next year and are looking for input from stakeholders on other sources of revenue, particularly for ambient monitoring revenues. Scoping Meeting for Ocean Plan Amendments Scheduled A meeting will be held on December 15 to seek input on the scope and content of the environmental document for the proposed Ocean Plan (Functional Equivalent Document) amendments. The four amendments are : • Choice of Indicator Organism for Water-Contact Bacterial Standards • Establishing a Fecal Coliform Standard for Recreational Shellfish Harvesting Areas • Reclassifying "Areas of Special Biological Significance (ASBS)" to "State Water Quality Protection Areas (SWQPAs)" and establishing implementation provisions for discharges to SWQPAs • "Reasonable Potential :" Determining the likelihood that the concentration of a pollutant would cause or contribute to an exceedance of water quality standards EP A Releases Draft Blending Poli cy (from EPA News Release} EPA has issued a draft policy to establish national guidelines on the practice of blending that is used by sewage treatment facilities to manage high flows associated with storm events . Widely used , blending is a technique to manage high flows that could damage sensitive parts of the sewage treatment system or could lead to overflows of raw sewage into local waterways . The draft policy outlines safeguards and requirements to be followed during blending and restates the requirement that all discharges must continue to meet Clean Water Act permit limits. The draft policy and additional information may be found at www.epa.gov/npdes/blending. The public comment period ends on January 9 , 2004. ·· s· -· ..... ,.d .~ ·. · '· -~··' · · . 1050 I S · ; . : Bio~_91ids ·committee ~o Survey Interest in Regional Biosolids Facility and Marketin Strate Members of the Biosoli ds Comm ittee met on December 1st to review a questionnaire that will be sent to all SCAP member agencies to ascertain their interest in participating in a regional biosolids facility. The goal of the survey is to determine if there is enough interest in a joint project to approach the SCAP Board and request the ability to move forward with a plan. Member agencies will be asked about their current disposal options, long-range plans and if they have any quantity of biosolids that they would want to divert to this facility. Importantly, the regional plan will also address marketing of the product (or products if a diversified strategy is deemed appropriate), so that the products will be used in accordance with regulatory requirements, and to avoid disincentives or barriers to the efficient reuse of biosolids. This survey is an important first step in providing a measure of long-term reliability to an area that, over the past decade, has seen less and less. The survey will be sent out during the second week of December; responses will be due back by the end of the first week of January. A summary of the responses will be prepared and presented to the Board by the first week of February. San Luis Obispo to Consider Interim Biosolids Ordinance The SLO Board of Supervisors will consider adopting an ordinance that will cap the annual use of biosolids at 1,000 cubic yards, allow only EQ and require that the county be notified of the application of 5 yards or more. Adoption of a final ordinance is estimated to be more than a year away. Federal Court Rejects Appomattox County, VA Anti-Biosolids Ordinances (from NBP) Culminating a 16-month legal battle by eleven Appomattox farmers to protect their state- Jicensed farming rights, Federal Judge Norman K. Moon on November 24 decided in favor of the farmers, ruling that Appomattox County's anti-biosolids ordinances are 11 voi~ and unenforceable." This ruling caps a string of legal victories for the farmers seeking to end the County's illegal ban on biosolids. The decision strikes down two anti-biosolids ordinances enacted by the Appomattox County Board in February and March 2002. Judge Moon ruled that under Virginia law, the authority of localities is limited to the testing and monitoring of biosolids to ensure compliance with state and federal rules. New biosolids legislation enacted earlier this year by the VA General Assembly clarifies that local concerns are to be addressed by the VA Department of Health, and not by localities enacting their own biosolids ordinances. WERF/CASA Seek Help on Biosolids Study CASA Biosolids Program Manager Marlaigne Hudnall is asking agencies to help WERF gather data to develop a microbial risk assessment for biosolids. The data that is being requested is persistence, survival, and transport rates of microbial pathogens under various environmental conditions. A one-page summary sheet and questionnaire is ava ilable from Marlaigne at mhudnall@ocsd.com . If your agency has any data that you are able and will ing to provide , please respond directly to Jeff Soller of EOA, Inc. (jasoller@eoainc.com) with a copy to Marlaigne. :collections stems . The Collection Systems Stee ring Committee met on November 12 at OCSD . SCAP's Executive Director Ray Miller and Collecti on Systems Committee Chair Nick Arhontes will continue to meet with the Southern Californ ia Regional Water Quality Control Boards' staff to open dialogue on exploring the possibility of providing uniformity in WDRs and in compliance reporting for sanitary sewer overflows . Meetings have been conducted with staff members of Regions 4 ,7 , 8 and 9 and staff have been very responsive and supportive . Cities and agencies provid ing sewer collection services are being identified for an active outreach program for membership in SCAP and on the committee . The Steering Committee will be compiling specific information on each of the cities and agencies (miles of trunk or collection pipeline , whether they own or just operate the system , number of plants , lift stations and average daily flows) to build a data base for future use . Workshops will be scheduled in various geographic locations after the first of the year. 11 These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman." Thomas Paine If you wo uld prefer to rece ive te xtual notification of the Monthly Update Click here To unsubscribe: Click here AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING December 17, 2003 -7:00 P.M. Agenda Posting : In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Sectio n 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials re lating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. Items Not Posted : In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Sectio n 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or because there is a need to take immediate action , which need came to the attention of the Board subsequent to the posting of agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. Accommodations for the Disabled : The Board of Directors Meeting Room is wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations, please contact the Orange County Sanitation District Board Secretary's office at (7 14) 593-7130 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. Items Continued: Items may be continued from this meeting without further notice to a Committee or Board meeting held within five (5) days of this meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(3). Meeting Adjournment: This meeting may be adjourned to a later time and items of business from this agenda may be considered at th e later meeting by Order of Adjournment and Notice in accordance with Government Code Section 54955 (posted within 24 hours). 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance (Director Patsy Marshall) 2 . Roll Call 3 . Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors , if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4 . Appointment of Chair pro tern , if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time . As determined by the Chair , speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. 12/17/03 Page 2 Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 6 . The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors . a. Report of Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations , presentations and awards b . Report of General Manager c . Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or a mendments are made, the minutes for the regular meeting held on November 19, 2003 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows : ALL DISTRICTS 11 /15/03 11 /30/03 Totals $9,135,154.83 $10,099,919.92 DIRECTORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving OCSD . This requires that you identify the contributor by name. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference , you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with OCSD. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requ iring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the publ ic in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions , and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Ca lendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall , upon recognition by the Chair, state their name , address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. " ! 12/17/03 Page 3 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Ca len dar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. (1) Receive and file petitions from Eric Holtz requesting annexation of 1.00 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) on Randall Street, in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No . OCSD 03-29, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-36 -Holtz Annexation). b. (1) Receive and file petitions from Tim Worden requesting annexation of 0 .36 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Vista Del Lago and Lemon Heights Drive in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-30, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No . OCSD-37 -Worden Annexation). c. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a reimbursement agreement with Charles Rinehart, Jack Selman, Tim Metzger, and the Jensen Family Trust for construction of a new 8" VCP sewer in Foothill Boulevard near La Cuesta Drive in Lemon Heights, in a form approved by General Counsel. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 11. STEERING COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a . Order draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 19, 2003 to be filed. Non -Consent Calendar b. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the December 17, 2003 meeting . c. Consideration of items deleted from Steering Committee Consent Ca lend ar, if any. ., 12/17/03 Page 4 ! 12. OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (OMTS) OMTS Consent Calendar a. Order draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 3, 2003 to be filed . b. Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order 38169-0S issued to M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. for Digester Gas Pipeline Corrosion Protection System Inspection and Repair, Specification No. S-2003-125BD, authorizing an addition of $50, 726 .83, increasing the total contract amount to $435,036 .83. c. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 101470-08 issued to Polydyne Inc., for the Purchase of Cationic Polymer, Specification No. C-2003-143, for an additional amount of $229,000, increasing the estimated amount to $1 ,059,000, for the contract period ending April 30, 2004 . d. (1) Authorize development of a Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) public education and outreach program in accordance with the provisions of California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Order No. R8-2002-0014, General Discharge Requirements for Sewage Collection Agencies; (2) Establish a budget of $150,000 for FOG public education and outreach program which will be divided equally among participating cities/agencies and Orange County Sanitation District; (3) Authorize the General Manager to develop a funding program with the cities/agencies within the District's jurisdiction for development of the FOG public education and outreach program; and (4) Authorize the General Manager to award a Consultant Services Agreement for Comprehensive Public Education and Outreach Program for Sewage Collection Agencies, Specification No. CS-2003-172BD, for an amount not to exceed $150,000. e. Approve a change order to Purchase Order No. 22834-0S, issued to Michael Turnipseed & Associates, for a time extension through June 30, 2004, to provide biosolids Environmental Management System related services, including the performance of biosolids land application site inspections in Kings and Kern counties, for an additional amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $115,000. f. Authorize the General Manager to utilize Riverside County's competitively bid multi-agency contract and execute an agreement with Softchoice Corporation for licensing Microsoft Enterprise desktop computer software, for a three year period effective December 31, 2003 through December 31, 2006, for a total amount not to exceed $350,000.00. • • OMTS Non-Consent Calendar 12/17/03 Page 5 g. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Sun Engineering Services for Indoor/Outdoor Lighting Study, Specification No . CS-2003-145BD, providing for a plant lighting study for a total amount not to ex ceed $110,000. h. Consideration of items deleted from OMTS Committee Consent Calendar, if any. 13 . PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITIEE (PDC) PDC Consent Calendar a. Order draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 4, 2003 to be filed . b. Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities , Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction , authorizing an addition of $20,680, increasing the total contract amount to $71 ,218,81'4 . c . (1) Approve a budget amendment of $189,396 for Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction , Job No. J-87, for a total budget of $7 ,767,396; and, (2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, with J .F. Shea Construction , Inc., authorizing an addition of $31,556, increasing the total contract amount to $4 ,231 ,742. d. Receive and file Final Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, dated November 2003, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. e. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates providing for professional services for Supplemental Full Secondary Treatment CEQA Documentation, Job No . J-40-10 , for an amount not to exceed $154,992. f. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation for engineering services for design of Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains, Bitter Point Pump Station to Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5 -58, for an amount not to exceed $1 ,018,907 . g . Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement w ith Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos . 1 and 2, Job No . J-35-2, providing for construction support services for an additional amount of $539,610, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3 ,951,021. h. Approve Amendment No . 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No . 1-2-4, providing for additional engineering construction support services for an additional amount of $264,900 , increasing the total amount not to exceed $2 ,019,411. 12/17/03 Page 6 i. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source purchase order agreement wi th NRG, Inc. for Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79, providing for the upgrade and reinstallation of nine existing and upgraded turbochargers , for an amount not to exceed $1,570 , 191 including sales tax and delivery. PDC Non-Consent Calendar j . Approve Professional Services Agreement with HOR Engineering for the design of Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation, Job No. P1-82 , for a total amount not to exceed $3, 125,026. k . Consideration of items deleted from PDC Committee Consent Calendar, if any 14. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITIEE (FAHR) FAHR Consent Calendar a . Order draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 10, 2003 to be fi led . (Minutes to be distributed at 12117103 Board Meeting.) b . Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2003. c. Receive and file the SWAP Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. d. /i) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-31, Approving Second Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pens ion Plan and Trust; 2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-32, Approving Third Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust; 3) Adopt Resolution No . OCSD No. 03-33, Approving Fourth Amendment to the District's Ex ecutive Money Purchase Pension Plan; and, 4) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-34, Terminating the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust. FAHR Non-Consent Calendar e . Consideration of items deleted from FAHR Consent Calendar, if any. • NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12/17/03 Page 7 15. Ordinance No. OCSD-21, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Fees, Procedures and Policies Concerning Anne xations of Territory to the District; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-03 : a. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-21 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance . (The waiver of the read ing of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) b. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-21 , and pass to second reading and public hearing on January 28 , 2004. 16. Ordinance No . OCSD-22, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Reaffirming Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Revised Capital Facilities Capacity Charges; Adopt ing Revised Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers ; and repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-2 0: a. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-22 by ti tle only and waive reading of said entire ordinance . (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) b . Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-22 , and pass to second reading and public hearing on January 28, 2004. 17. Closed Session CLOSED SESSION : During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation , or personnel matters , pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8 , 54956.9 , 54957 or 54957 .6 , as noted. Reports relat ing to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives ; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a perm itted closed session and are not ava ilable for public inspection . At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects , the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information . a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel and General Manager pursuant to Government Code Sec. 54956.9(c) re: one matter of possible li tigation. b. Reconvene in regular session c. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 12/17/03 Page 8 20. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for January 28, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. 21. Adjournments f N.oTi'cE.TO··r;i·RECTO.RS·;··:r~"~j~~~·;·t~·~·~-·~·~··th ·~-~-~~-~-d~··f~~··th~··R~~-~-i~~··M·~~-ti'~'~··~f.~h~···9~·~~d ··~f····· .. ············· .. ·1 1Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days 1 i preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by i j Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. j I General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 banderson@ocsd.com I !Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 pkyle@ocsd .com i iDirector/Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 dludwin@ocsd.com i 1Director/FinancefTreasurer Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 1 gstreed@ocsd.com i lDirector/Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 ltomko@ocsd .com i jrnrector/lnformation Technology Patrick Miles (714) 593-7280 pmiles@ocsd.com i 1 Director/Operations & j 1 Maintenance Bob Ooten (714) 593-7020 rooten@ocsd .com i 1rnrectorfTechnical Services Bob Ghirelli (714) 593-7400 rqhirell i@o csd .com 1 j Communications Services Mgr. Carol Beekman (714) 593-7120 cbeekman@ocsd.com i L~.~D.~.r.?..l..~9.!!.f.l.~.~.l... ........................................... T..~.~.'!'.~~ .. h: .. W.9.9.9.r.!!.ff. ................ (?..1.~L?..?..1.:?.~9.?. ....... ~!:«.@::':l.:?.:?.:!.~.~.£9..m .......................................... .l C :\Documents and Settings\Uw\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK44\121703 draft agenda-1 j ldoc .. Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 2003 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 \ Minutes for Board Meeting Page2 11/19/03 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on November 19, 2003, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS x Shirley McCracken, Chair Bob Hernandez x Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Steve Simonian x Don Bankhead Leland Wilson x Brian Brady Peer A. Swan A Patricia Campbell Paul Yost x Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz x Alberta Christy Mike Garcia x John Collins Larry Crandall x Debbie Cook Connie Boardman x Bill Dalton Bruce Broadwater x Brian Donahue David Shawver x Michael Duvall Keri Lynn Wilson x Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill x James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer x Alice B. Jempsa Marilynn M. Poe x Tony Kawashima Doug Davert A Beth Krom Christina Shea A Patsy Marshall Jim Dow x Robert McGowan Richard A. Freschi x Roy Moore John Beauman x Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson x Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan x Tod Ridgeway Don Webb x Jim Silva Chuck Smith Paul Walker x Larry Herman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Carol Beekman; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Jeff Reed; Lisa Arosteguy; Mike Moore; Ingrid Hellebrand; Pat Carrillo; Jim Davidson OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel; Don Hughes; Gerhardt van Orie Minutes for Board Meeting Page3 11/19/03 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair McCracken announced the appointment of Directors Brian Brady, Brian Donahue and Jim Silva to the Cooperative Projects Committee, which also includes Directors Steve Anderson and Jim Ferryman. The meeting schedule for December was reviewed, and it was reported that the Board Meeting in December would be held on the third Wednesday of the month due to the holidays. It was also noted that the working committees would be dark in January. REPORTOFTHEGENERALMANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, referred the Directors to the monthly memo included in the Directors' meeting folders regarding the level of secondary treatment, as well as a brochure they would be receiving monthly on the progress of the Groundwater Replenishment System. He also directed their attention to a pamphlet outlining the Third Orange County Leadership Symposium, and encouraged all Directors to attend this event which is co-sponsored by the Orange County Sanitation District. It was announced that the District received three awards from the Santa Ana River Basin Section of the California Water Environment Association. Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, then recognized Jim Davidson for presentation of the Pretreatment Pollution Prevention and Stormwater Person of the Year award; Pat Carrillo for the Operator of the Year award; and Treatment Plant No. 2 received the Plant of the Year award. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held October 22, 2003, be deemed approved, as written. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/03 10/31/03 Totals $11, 112,700.19 $11,370,272.71 Director Alice Jempsa abstained from discussion and voting on Warrant Nos. 56847, 56848, and 56871, pursuant to California Government Code Section 84308. Minutes for Board Meeting Page4 11/19/03 9. a. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Bill Tovatt requesting to annex 1.02 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the ·vicinity of Randall Street and Clark Street in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-25, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-33-Tovatt Annexation). b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Ken Kirkland requesting to annex 0.31 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Randall Street and Clark Street in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-26, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-35 -Kirkland Annexation). COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the November 19, 2003 meeting. Consent Calendar Chair McCracken announced that the CASA Conference will be held January 21-24 in Palm Springs. It was also reported the Steering Committee received a progress report from the Directors Compensation Task Committee. Chair McCracken reported on items presented by staff and discussed by the committee: • Evaluation of an unsolicited proposal regarding alternative treatment was provided by staff. •An update on the negotiations with SAWPA was given, and an agreement is expected to be finalized for approval at the December Board meeting. • The Federal Fish and Wildlife Service is moving slowly on its environmental studies related to the Santa Ana River and the SARI line. These studies are being monitored closely by staff as the studies are required as part of the environmental impact statement on the SARI line improvements. • A proposed joint campus that would include a single common road connecting the Sanitation District, Orange County Water District and Municipal Water District offices together was discussed. The Committee directed staff to continue discussions on this issue. Minutes for Board Meeting ., Page 5 11/19/03 • Directors were provided an update on the renewal of the NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit. •Legislative consultant contracts were considered and the Committee recommended that purchase orders be issued for these services. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order the Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 22, 2003 to be filed. Non-Consent Calendar b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Establish a budget of $320,000 for state and federal legislative advocacy; (2) Authorize the General Manager to enter into Consultant Services Agreements with ENS Resources, Inc. for a contract amount not to exceed $180,000, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, LLP for a contract amount not to exceed $60,000, and Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. for a contract amount not to exceed $60,000 for a one-year period, effective January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, which will provide for professional advocacy services, in a form approved by General Counsel; and, (3) Each contract is renewable for up to three (3) one-year periods at the discretion of the General Manager. 12. OPERATIONS. MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITIEE (OMTS) Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 5, 2003 to be filed. Non-Consent Calendar b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Final Report for Corrosion Management Assessment Study, Specification No. CS-2002-80-BD, dated September 2003, prepared by M.J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. Minutes for Board Meeting Page6 11/19/03 13. PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITIEE Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the regular meeting held on November 6, 2003, to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation of 36-inch Forcemain (B) Between Bitter Point Pump Station and Junction Box, Contract No. 5-29-R1, with lnsituform Technologies, Inc., authorizing a deduction of $15,529, decreasing the total contract amount to $1,536,941; and, (2) Accept Contract No. 5-29-R1 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 10 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of $56,041, increasing the total contract amount to $71, 198, 134. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $197,094, increasing the total contract amount to $14, 731,356. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve a budget Amendment of $4,222,000 for Long Term Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, for a project budget of $7,074,000; and, (2) Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with ADS Environmental Services for additional flow monitoring and analysis for an additional amount of $125,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $6,337 ,400. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 1, to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., for Ellis Avenue Pump Station Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-10, providing for additional design engineering services for an additional amount of $400,055, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,586,082. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, providing for additional engineering services during construction, for an additional amount of $78,500, increasing the total amount not to exceed $440,979. ; .. ... . Minutes for Board Meeting Page7 11/19/03 h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation for additional construction support services for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, for an additional amount of $1,776,417, increasing the total amount not to exceed to $6, 164,240. Non-Consent Calendar No items considered. 14. FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 12, 2003 to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 2003. c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2003 through September 30, 2003. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the 2003-04 First Quarter Financial Report for the period ending September 30, 2003. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve SAFETY-POL 113 - Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens Program, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03- 27, Authorizing the Director of Human Resources to Appoint or Employ Agents or Advisors to Implement and Administer District's Deferred Compensation Plan Loan Program. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03- 28, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for: 1. Create the Automotive/Heavy Equipment Assistant classification at pay range 53 ($16. 772 -$20.965); and, 2. Delete the Lead Collection Facilities Worker classification at pay grade 66 ($23.123 -$28.904). Minutes for Board Meeting Page a 11/19/03 h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve the reclassifications of eight District employees, the upgrading of one vacant position and an equity adjustment for one employee. i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2003, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to invest the Debt Service Reserve Fund for the 2003 Certificates of Participation through a competitive selection process to be conducted by the District's Financial Advisor, Public Resources Advisory Group, in accordance with the District's Investment Policy. k. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve two additional vanpool routes for the Rideshare Program utilizing existing vans; and, (2) Approve implementation of rideshare incentives in an effort to comply with SCAQMD Rule 2202 and meet established Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) targeted goal, at the Board's discretion and subject to change by the Board at any time. Non-Consent Calendar No items considered. 15. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE (JCC) Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 13, 2003, to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to Colich Construction LP, for construction of Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) Unit II Pipeline Project, Contract No. GWRS-2003-4, for an amount not to exceed $16,084,005, with OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District paying equal shares of $8,042,003. Non-Consent Calendar No items were considered. -• Minutes for Board Meeting Page9 11/19/03 16. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6: The Board convened in closed session at 7:25 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss Agenda Item Nos. 16(a) (1) and (2). Director John Collins removed himself from the room during the consideration of Agenda Item Nos. 16(a)(1) and (2). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 7:30 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. a. 1. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding with the Orange County Employees Association re salaries, benefits and terms and conditions of employment for the period November 29, 2002 through June 30, 2007. Directors Don Bankhead and Debbie Cook opposed. 2. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding with the Supervisory and Professional Management Team Group re salaries, benefits and terms and conditions of employment for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2007. Directors Don Bankhead and Debbie Cook opposed. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:31 p.m. G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\Minutes\ 111903 draft minutes.doc Warrant No. Vendor Accounts Payable -Warrants 56276 Carollo Engineers finJ21onc 56277 Orange County Sanitation District 56278 Paulus Engineering, Inc. 56279 Perona, Langer, Beck, Lallande & Serbin 56280 Southern California Edison 56281 Southern California Edison 56282 UBS Financial Services, Inc. 56283 UC Regents 56284 Airgas Safety, Inc. 56285 Allied Packing & Rubber, Inc. 56286 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 56287 AT & T Wreless Services -Airtime 56288 Carollo Engineers 56289 Court Order 56290 County Wlolesale Electric Co. 56291 Court Trustee 56292 Dulgarian, Dick 56293 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 56294 Environmental Management Consulting 56295 Court Order 56296 Franchise Tax Board 56297 FLW, Inc. 56298 Government Finance Officers Association 56299 City of Huntington Beach 56300 Industrial Metal Supply 56301 Internal Revenue Service 56302 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng. AFL-CIO Local 501 56303 Irvine Ranch water District 56304 Living Leadership 56305 Maintenance Technology Corp. 56306 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 56307 National Bond & Trust 56308 Nextel Communications 56309 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 56310 OCEA 56311 Pacific Industrial Supply 56312 Court Order 56313 Court Order 56314 Peace Officers Council of CA 56315 PenValve 56316 Posner, Allen 56317 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 56318 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 56319 James W. Silva 56320 Court Order 56321 Southern California Edison Co. 56322 Summit Steel 56323 SBC 56324 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 56325 Lisa L. Tomko Claims Paid From 10/01/03to10/15/03 $ Amount 41,029.46 800,510.69 68,249.00 65,000.00 115,378.33 85,870.37 39,172.19 30,000.00 4,572.74 121.04 166.72 4,122.58 1,753.50 150.00 163.50 69.12 2, 107.21 7,898.20 3,915.00 525.00 100.00 509.44 50.00 30.00 580.73 450.00 3,731.22 76.50 1,323.00 343.10 3,658.22 2,045.44 4,540.04 496.10 552.36 126.15 40.00 296.00 1,530.00 437.01 6,176.70 7,975.00 177.76 789.37 721.50 14,298.91 1,131.36 1,278.66 5,262.97 666.01 Description Professional Services -Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study Payroll EFT Reimbursement Engineering Service -Sewer Repair Claim Settlement -Personnel Issue Power Power Remarking Fees -Series 2000A Certificates of Participation Membership -Coastal water Research & Modeling Project Safety Supplies & Equipment Plumbing Parts & Supplies Telephone Service Cellular Phone Service Professional Services -Rate Fee Study Wage Garnishment Electrical Parts & Supplies Wage Garnishment Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care Prof. Serv. -Data Analysis & Reporting & Ventilation Measurement for Belt Press Bldg. Wage Garnishment Wage Garnishment Mechanical Parts & Supplies Publication Water Use Metal Wage Garnishment Dues Deduction water Use Mechanical Maintenance Training Registration Mechanical Supplies Mechanical Parts, Tools & Supplies U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions Cellular Phones & Air Time Lab Parts & Supplies Dues Deduction Instrument Parts & Supplies Wage Garnishment Wage Garnishment Dues Deduction Mechanical Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Construction -Emergency Lining of Failed 8" VCP Lining Water Use Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Wage Garnishment Construction -Relocation of Edison Line -Garden Grove Metal Telephone Services Mechanical Parts & Supplies Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-101503.xls Page 1of10 EXHIBIT A 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 56326 United Way 56327 Verizon California 56328 Voided Check 56329 Nicholas J. Arhontes 56330 Michael A. Berdis 56331 Thomas M. Blanda 56332 James A. Carter 56333 William D. Cassidy 56334 Ronald C. Cortez 56335 Allan P. Dumlao 56336 James M. Ela 56337 Tim H. Hopkins 56338 Chandra R. Johannesson 56339 Dean R. Karels 56340 Selwyn D. Mansell 56341 Michael N. Morey 56342 Peter M. Morrison 56343 Samuel L. Mowbray 56344 James C. Mullins 56345 Umesh N. Murthy 56346 Edmund L. Pendleton 56347 Rodney K. Petersen 56348 William F. Pierce 56349 Jeffrey T. Reed 56350 Henry R. Salgado 56351 Curt V. Shelp 56352 Jean E. Tappan 56353 Charles F. Winsor 56354 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 56355 Crane, Lenora 56356 Luna, Lourdes 56357 VVEFTEC 56358 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 56359 Black & Veatch Corporation 56360 Blue Cross of California 56361 California Soil Products 56362 Carollo Engineers 56363 Carollo Engineers 56364 Delta Dental 56365 Fluor Enterprises, Inc. 56366 Hill Brothers 56367 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 56368 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 56369 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 56370 Mooring Systems, Inc. 56371 Orange County Water District 56372 RBF Consulting 56373 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 56374 Southern California Material Handling 56375 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 56376 U.S. Metro Group, Inc. 56377 Waste Markets fin121onc Claims Paid From 10/01/03to10/15/03 Amount 305.00 635.55 417.31 313.83 863.76 147.84 100.00 523.36 629.81 320.25 34.00 275.00 31.00 378.66 280.80 541.61 809.37 150.00 150.00 82.00 304.91 393.16 943.28 616.11 281.60 118.62 170.00 720.00 1,671.80 2,091.79 100.00 64,243.47 326,504.46 650,452.92 48,325.29 47,321.39 523,873.90 55,474.96 56,125.29 49,579.68 54,799.21 50,801.76 55,824.38 41,678.00 60,783.42 30,028.10 54,032.92 32,960.60 155,498.53 26,235.00 99,943.22 Description Employee Contributions Telephone Services Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meeting(f raining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meeting(f raining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meeting(f raining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meeting(f raining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Meeting(f raining Expense Reimbursement Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement Maint. Agreement-Repair/Installation of Base, Handheld & Vehicle Radios Employee Computer Loan Program Employee Computer Loan Program Project Management Office Meeting Registration Professional Services J-73-2 Engineering Services P1-76, J-71-3 & P2-85 Medical Insurance Premium Biosolids Disposal Professional Services -Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study Professional Services -Microfiltration Demonstration Project & P2-66 Dental Insurance Plan Engineering Services J-84 Chemicals -Odor & Corrosion Control -Newport Trunkline Constr. -Gas FlapNari. Loe.; Install Concrete Box, Manhole Cover Repair; Junction Box Investigation Medical Insurance Premium Professional Services 1-1 O & J-79 (4) Trawl Resistant Bottom Mounts & Edge Tech Deck Unit GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 Engineering Services 2-24-1 Professional Services-Ocean Monitoring P-179 & P-185 (1) Pneumatic Tire Forklift Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 Janitorial & Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 & 2 Maint. Agreement -Grit & Screenings Removal & Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Clalms Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-101503.xls Page 2of10 c. 11/1012003 •1 Claims Paid From 10/01/03to10/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrll!tlon 56378 Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart 112,565.75 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 56379 ARB, Inc. 1,113,237.18 Construction 11-22 56380 Cora Constructors 456,120.00 Construction 7-7-2 56381 Steve P Rados, Inc. 741,690.90 Construction 1-2-4 56382 Union Bank of California 82,410.10 Construction 1-2-4, Retention 56383 Kienow Associates, Inc. 27,451.51 Litigation Services -Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 56384 A & G Industries 858.39 Stainless Steel wash Boxes 56385 A Tint of Glass 368.00 VVlndow Tinting 56386 Abatix Environmental Corp. 220.89 Hardware 56387 Adamson Industries 257.95 Lab Parts & Supplies 56388 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 3,774.67 Engine Parts & Supplies 56389 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1,347.76 Lab Parts & Supplies 56390 Airborne Express 75.64 Air Freight 56391 Airgas Safety, Inc. 959.86 Safety Supplies & Equipment 56392 Allied Packing & Rubber, Inc. 1,963.14 Mechanical Supplies 56393 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 53.50 Instrument Supplies 56394 Aluminum Precision 588.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56395 American Industrial Supply, Inc. 685.58 Insecticide 56396 American Machinery & Blade, Inc. 2,347.46 Professional Services -Asbestos Study 56397 Archie Ivy, Inc. 2,835.00 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56398 Atlantis Pool Care 750.00 Service Agreement -Admin. Bldg. Atrium 56399 Awards & Trophies Company 26.27 Plaques 56400 ABB Automation, Inc. 775.24 Flow Meter Repairs 56401 AMSA 695.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 56402 Robicon Corporation 519.83 Prof. Serv. -Programming & Complete Start-Up of Robicon Drives 56403 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 82.46 Telephone Service 56404 AT&T VVlreless-TITAN 676.76 Cellular Phone Equipment & Accessories 56405 AT&T VVlreless Services 3,066.75 VVlreless Phone Services 56406 Baker Tanks 3,136.00 Tank Rentals 56407 Battery Specialties 608.23 Batteries 56408 Ben Meadows Company, Inc. 19.84 Lab Supplies 56409 BioMerieux Vitek, Inc. 1,078.86 Lab Supplies 56410 BioSpherical Instruments, Inc. 172.69 Instrument Maint. 56411 Brown & Caldwell 200.00 Notices & Ads 56412 Bush & Associates, Inc. 1,260.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 56413 BC VVlre Rope & Rigging 597.32 Rigging Devices & Certification 56414 California Auto Collision 1,396.59 Vehicle Repairs -V-328 56415 California Relocation Services, Inc. 1,357.51 Moving/Relocation Services 56416 California State University Institute 11,404.50 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 56417 Caltrol, Inc. 4,123.32 Mechanical Repairs & Maintenance 56418 CalCOFI 300.00 Compliance Training Registration 56419 Cell2Cell 484.90 Cellular Phone Equipment & Accessories 56420 Center for Creative Growth 4,600.00 Professional Services -0 & M Executive & Management Coaching 56421 Certified Truck Bodies 10,193.37 Installation of Generator on Truck Bed & Misc. Parts -V-527 56422 Charles P. Crowley Co. 140.96 Instrument Parts 56423 Clickguard Corporation 222.75 Printer Service Agreement 56424 Coast Fire Equipment 1,363.56 Fire Extinguishers 56425 Coast Rubber Stamp, Mfg. 77.58 Stationery & Office Supplies 56426 Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 850.00 Analysis of Industrial Wastewater, Wastewater & Biosolids 56427 Communications Supply Corp. 243.95 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56428 Compressor Components of California 3,744.00 Coil Cleaning & Testing & Compressor Parts 56429 Computer Sciences Corp. 10,756.61 Consulting & Lab Services-Assay Pilot Project rin121onc G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Oaims Paid Report\02.03\Claims Paid Report -101503.xls Page 3of10 ~I EXHIBIT A 11/1012003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03to10/15/03 Warrant No. _V..;.e_n_d_or _____________ _ fin121onc 56430 Con-Way Western Express 56431 Consolidated Elect. Distributors 56432 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 56433 Cooper Camerion Corporation 56434 Corporate Express Imaging 56435 Corporate Express 56436 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 56437 County VVholesale Electric Co. 56438 CEM Corporation 56439 CEPA Company 56440 CGvL Engineers 56441 CR&R, Inc. 56442 County Sanitation District No. 70 56443 CSMFO 56444 CVVE.A 56445 C'WEA Membership 56446 David's Tree Service 56447 Del Mar Analytical 56448 Diamond H Recognition 56449 Document Control Solutions, Inc. 56450 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 56451 DGA Consultants, Inc. 56452 DMARK Corporation 56453 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 56454 Ecology Control Industries 56455 Ecology Tire, Inc. 56456 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 56457 Electro-Test, Inc. 56458 Employers Group 56459 Employers Group Service Corp. 56460 Employment Development Dept. 56461 Enchanter, Inc. 56462 Eriez Magnetics 56463 ENS Resources, Inc. 56464 FedEx Corporation 56465 Filarsky & Watt, L.L.P. 56466 First American Real Estate Solutions 56467 Fisher Scientific 56468 Flomax Products, Inc. 56469 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 56470 Franklin Covey 56471 Fry's Electronics 56472 G.F.O.A. 56473 Garratt-Callahan Company 56474 General Petroleum 56475 Gerhardt's, Inc. 56476 Getinge Castle 56477 Golden State Controls 56478 Grafix Training & Consulting 56479 Grainger, Inc. 56480 Haaker Equipment Company 56481 Hach clo Ponton Industries Amount 282.52 3,789.82 104.94 6,585.63 2,401.70 4,715.74 830.03 454.80 1,400.16 125.00 3,757.28 315.00 6,290.00 100.00 150.00 97.00 5,875.00 2,555.00 111.61 2,108.00 316.61 4,697.00 4,240.97 2,301.15 1,297.33 338.50 1,000.00 10,285.80 3,009.40 1,750.00 2,338.27 2,700.00 2,787.01 15,000.00 138.14 4,275.00 647.50 16,064.64 922.77 21,514.87 269.05 977.80 95.00 4,086.75 17,761.01 2,568.61 911.24 751.18 4,631.50 7,221.93 168.14 1,353.97 G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -101503.xls Description Freight Electrical Fixtures. Parts & Supplies Plumbing Supplies Cen Gen Engine Parts Computer Supplies Office Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Electrical Parts & Supplies Lab Supplies Lab Equipment Maint. Service Engineering Services P1-94 Container Rentals Olfactometry Lab Expense Membership Notices&Ads Membership -Calif. Water Environment Assoc. Tree Maint. Service Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater Employee Service Awards Software Support Paint Supplies Engineering Services -CCTV Data Evaluation Support Workbench & Accessories Electrical Supplies Hazardous Waste Services Waste Management -Tires Medical Screening Professional Services J-33-1 Membership Human Resources On-Site Training State Unemployment Tax Ocean Monitoring & Outfall Inspection & Maintenance Lifting Magnets Professional Services -Legislative Advocate Air Freight Prof. Services -OCSD Bargaining Group Labor Negotiation Meetings & Special Services Subscription to Orange County Property Information Lab Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Long-Term & Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium Office Supplies Computer Supplies Accounting Training Registration Chemicals Unleaded Gasoline Mechanical Parts & Supplies Lab Parts & Supplies Electrical Parts & Supplies On-Site Adobe Acrobat Training Electrical Parts & Supplies Misc. Vehicle Repairs, Parts & Service Lab Parts & Supplies Page 4of10 EXHIBIT .. A 11/1012003 Warrant No. Vendor fin/210Ac ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 56482 Hach Company 56483 Harbour Engineering Group 56484 Harold Primrose Ice 56485 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 56486 Heat Technology Products 56487 Herman Miller V\k>rkplace Resource 56488 Home Depot 56489 Hopkins Technical Products 56490 Hub Auto Supply 56491 HI Standard Automotive 56492 Industrial Distribution Group 56493 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 56494 Information Resources 56495 Insight Investments 56496 lntratek Computer, Inc. 56497 Invensys Systems, Inc. 56498 Ionics Instrument Business Group 56499 Iron Mountain 56500 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 56501 ISCO, Inc. 56502 IPI GrammTech, Inc. 56503 J E Phillips Company, Inc. 56504 J.G. Tucker and Son, Inc. 56505 J.L. 'Mngert Co. 56506 Jay's Catering 56507 Jensen Instrument Co. 56508 Johnson & Associates, L.L.C. 56509 Johnstone Supply 56510 JPMorgan Chase Bank 56511 Kforce, Inc. 56512 Kroy, L.L.C. 56513 KWCommunications 56514 Lee & Ro, Inc. 56515 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 56516 LINJER 56517 M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. 56518 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 56519 Mc Junkin Corp-Ontario Branch 56520 McBain Instruments 56521 McMahan Business Interiors 56522 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 56523 McRay Industries, Inc. 56524 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 56525 Medlin Controls Co. 56526 Michael Asner Consulting 56527 Mid-West Associates 56528 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 56529 Mission Uniform Service 56530 Motor Cargo 56531 Myers Power Products, Inc. 56532 MARMAC Field Services, Inc. 56533 MGD Technologies, Inc. Claims Paid From 10/01/03to10/15/03 Amount 1,960.50 15,604.00 55.50 308.53 4,703.04 7.24 193.30 498.92 500.87 388.77 1,501.28 3,033.64 875.00 4,697.90 8,760.00 5,258.91 2,507.20 75.00 234.00 9,051.00 13,612.50 4,195.79 1,300.27 1,508.65 775.26 1,667.73 5,000.00 17.34 8,798.00 5,822.31 81.30 5,257.50 1,993.99 106.63 1,792.52 3,456.00 3,950.64 517.74 130.26 676.02 3,807.48 4,060.45 802.62 1,365.77 450.00 5,471.94 1,240.00 4,341.04 135.25 84.35 22,934.10 18,300.00 Description Lab Supplies (4) 14" Gould Pump Impellers Ice For Samples Plumbing Supplies Mechanical Parts, Supplies & Repairs Office Supplies Misc. Repair & Maintenance Material Pump Supplies Vehicle Parts & Supplies Automotive Parts, Supplies & Repairs Mechanical Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Human Resources Service -Background Checks Electrical Parts & Supplies IBM Network Support Electrical Parts & Supplies Lab Supplies Bid Document Storage Fees P1-37 & J-39 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server Instrument Parts & Supplies Software Maint. Agreement Electrical Parts & Supplies Cell Chlorine for Cal 2000 Generator Electrical Supplies Meeting Expenses Mechanical Parts & Supplies Professional Services -2003 Benchmark Survey Update Water Filters Annual Administration Fees for 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation Temporary Employment Services Stationery & Office Supplies Community Outreach Re Bushard Trunkline Replacement Project Professional Services P1-93 Meeting Expense Professional Service -DART MO 9-22-99 Professional Services -Corrosion Assessment Study Executive Disability Plan Premium Valves Microscope Service & Parts Computer Cabinet Mechanical Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Mechanical Seal Repair Instrument Supplies Purchasing Training Registration Mechanical Parts & Supplies Mechanical Repairs & Maintenance Uniform Rentals Freight Electrical Supplies Professional Services 5-56 Temporary Flow Monitoring G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -101503.xls Page 5of10 EXHIBIT A 11/1012003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56534 Mine Safety Appliances 1,167.46 Instrument Parts & Supplies 56535 National Institute of Standards & Technology 1,184.00 Lab Parts & Supplies 56536 National Plant Services, Inc. 440.00 Vacuum Truck Services 56537 Neal Supply Co. 7.65 Plumbing Supplies 56538 Network Associates, Inc. 3,556.77 Software Upgrade 56539 NetVersant of Southern California 5,559.86 Security System Maintenance 56540 New Hermes, Inc. 247.17 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56541 Newark Electronics 156.44 Instrument Supplies 56542 Nicholas Netty 605.00 l.N.S. Permit Fees 56543 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 741.45 Turbine Oil 56544 Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc. 109.34 Battery & Tray for Honda Generator 56545 Nu-way Laser Engraving 138.40 Steel Tags 56546 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,757.52 Office Supplies 56547 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,093.80 Janitorial Supplies 56548 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 1,073.69 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56549 Orange County Hose Company 293.45 Hose Supplies & Parts 56550 The Orange County Register 3,284.08 Subscription 56551 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 92.00 Plumbing Supplies 56552 Osterbauer Compressor 1,118.49 Mechanical Supplies 56553 Oxygen Service Company 2,772.20 Specialty Gases 56554 OCASSE 99.00 Safety & Health Meeting Registration 56555 OCDM Marketing 5,725.50 Processing Fees -Public Notice Mailing & Postage 56556 ORE Offshore 9,899.68 Coastal Acoustic Release Transponder 56557 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 185.67 Electrical Supplies 56558 Pacific Industrial Supply 606.47 Small Tools 56559 Pacific Parts & Controls, Inc. 236.62 Electrical Supplies 56560 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 123.35 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56561 Parker Hannifin Corporation 224.14 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56562 Parker Supply Company 20,045.71 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56563 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 3,607.98 Tires 56564 Paulus Engineering, Inc. 8,837.00 Construction -Sink Hole Repairs on Beach Blvd. 56565 Pen Valve 2,618.25 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 56566 Perma Pure, Inc. 72.37 Lab Parts & Supplies 56567 PinnacleOne Institute 675.00 Engineering & Construction Training Registration 56568 Power Design 8,490.70 Power Supply 56569 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 463.45 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 56570 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 4,505.52 Office Furniture 56571 Process Equipment Company 879.15 Pump Supplies 56572 Projects Partners 1,119.20 Temporary Employment Services 56573 PCS Express, Inc. 110.00 Courier Service 56574 PRSA -Orange County Chapter 75.00 Notices& Ads 56575 Quinn Shepard Machinery 32.81 Catapillar Oil Filters 56576 R & R Instrumentation, Inc. 1,040.40 Instrument Supplies 56577 R. W. Beck 3,233.80 Professional Services P1-90 56578 Rainin Instrument, L.L.C. 540.37 Lab Parts & Supplies 56579 Reliastar 9,403.70 Employee Medical Health Premium 56580 Relizon Company 387.90 Publication 56581 RemedyTemp, Inc. 2,397.44 Temporary Employment Services 56582 Retrofit Parts & Components, Inc. 3,805.59 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56583 RPM Electric Motors 967.46 Repairs & Maintenance Service 56584 S & J Supply Co., Inc. 1,034.40 Pump Supplies 56585 Safety-Kleen 500.20 Parts washer Lease & Service fin121onc G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-101503.xls Page 6of10 EXHIBIT,A 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 56586 Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. 56587 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 56588 Schwing America, Inc. 56589 Scottel Voice & Data, Inc. 56590 Sethco Division I Met-Pro Corp 56591 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 56592 Shasta Electric, L.P. 56593 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 56594 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 56595 Smith Pipe & Supply 56596 Smith-Emery Company 56597 Sparling Instruments, Inc. 56598 Spex Certiprep, Inc. 56599 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 56600 Strata International, Inc. 56601 Summit Steel 56602 Sunset Ford 56603 Sunset Industrial Parts 56604 Super Power Products 56605 Systime Computer Corp. 56606 SC Field Technical Services 56607 SETAC 56608 SPX Valves & Control 56609 T & C Industrial Controls, Inc. 56610 Tekdraulics, Inc. 56611 Teledyne Electronic Tech. 56612 Terminix International 56613 Terminix International Co. #2474 56614 Thomas V. Garlinger 56615 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 56616 Time Motion Tools 56617 Time Warner Communication 56618 Times Community News 56619 Todd Painting, Inc. 56620 Tony's Lock & Safe Service & Sales 56621 Toshiba International Corporation 56622 Townsend Public Affairs 56623 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 56624 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. 56625 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 56626 TEKsystems 56627 US Filter Corporation 56628 Ultra Scientific 56629 United Parcel Service 56630 United States Treasury 56631 UC Regents 56632 US Filter \/\/estates Carbon 56633 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 56634 Varian, Inc. 56635 Verne's Plumbing 56636 Village Nurseries 56637 Vision Service Plan-(CA) fin121onc Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03 Amount 2,771.24 2,030.00 29.12 2,284.80 1,156.93 528.08 23,180.49 136.79 213.13 587.92 82.00 2,362.29 308.74 581.35 505.46 863.36 12.61 4,679.38 775.80 17,975.00 2,675.95 500.00 4,929.78 929.24 2,076.08 175.81 3,045.00 910.00 1,385.00 1,741.61 236.67 40.47 350.00 2,908.80 71.85 106.54 5,000.00 11, 170.09 688.54 2,220.00 13,371.00 1,159.00 319.70 1,088.25 2,929.78 1,245.00 1,679.84 13,346.00 2,367.10 175.00 29.08 9,007.20 Description Lab Parts & Supplies Construction -Pump Out (3) Air Jumpers Pump Supplies Telephone System Maintenance Pump Supplies Painting Supplies Construction -Electrical Cable Removal Lab Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Plumbing Supplies Concrete & Other Materials Testing Mechanical Parts & Supplies Lab Parts & Supplies Carpet Cleaning Services Chemicals Metal Automotive Parts & Service Mechanical Supplies Janitorial Supplies Professional Services -J D Edwards One V\brld XE Implementation Flame Arrester Compliance Meeting Registration Valves Electrical Supplies Mechanical Supplies Instrument Parts Pest Control Pest Control Lab Analyses Mechanical Parts & Supplies Tools Cable Services Notices&Ads Painting Services -Electrical & Instrumentation Bldg. 6 Locks & Keys Electrical Repairs Legislative & Executive Advocate for Grant Funding Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 Automotive Supplies Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater Temporary Employment Services Service Agreement -Lab Purification System Lab Supplies Parcel Services Professional Services J-85 -Naval Post Graduate School Human Resources Training Registration 200 Series Carbon Absorber Temporary Employment Service Lab Parts & Supplies Service Contract-Testing & Cert. Backflow Devices at Pits. 1 & 2 & Pump Sta. Landscaping Supplies Vision Service Premium G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-101503.xls Page 7of10 EXHIBIT A 11/10/2003 Clalms Paid From 10/01/03to10/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56638 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,914.91 Lab Parts & Supplies 56639 The Wackenhut Corporation 17,204.85 Security Guards 56640 Waco Filters 2,018.04 Filters 56641 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 13,171.63 Engineering SeNice J-67 56642 Waxie Sanitary Supply 651.99 Janitorial Supplies 56643 Weber Scientific 369.35 Lab Supplies 56644 Western States Controls 1,895.66 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56645 WEF 1,608.00 Membership -Water Environment Federation 56646 Xerox Corp -OMNI 3,848.16 Fax Machine 56647 Xerox Corporation 11,677.10 Fax & Copier Leases 56648 XESystems, Inc. 825.00 Xerox Synergix Scan System Maintenance Agreement 56649 York International 361.53 Oil & Filters 56650 Zee Medical 90.51 Safety Supplies 56651 Unity Constructors 14,487.30 Construction 7-14-4 56652 Juan J. Ambriz 328.64 Meeting!Training Expense Reimbursement 56653 EmilioAriston 457.48 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56654 Layne T. Baroldi 149.75 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56655 James L. Burror 131.00 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56656 James A. carter 237.93 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56657 George A. Charette 488.12 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56658 Peter Chaffs 392.18 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56659 Donald R. Cleveland 194.07 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56660 Philip F. Cordova 302.30 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56661 Carla D. Dillon 304.88 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56662 John B. Falkenstein 312.87 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56663 David P. Francis 272.45 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56664 Roy A. Hendy 501.81 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56665 Tyler T. Hoang 504.55 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56666 Deirdre E. Hunter 610.21 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56667 Chandra R. Johannesson 169.00 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56668 Voided Check 56669 Michael J. Mccusker 391.56 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56670 John Mirkovich 488.33 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56671 Joseph W. Park, Jr. 479.12 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56672 Steven D. Pelletier 509.53 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56673 VVilliam F. Pierce 274.99 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56674 Michael Reideler 328.15 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56675 Roy J. Reynolds 306.48 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56676 Darren J. Schuler 280.18 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56677 Robert J. Taylor 507.10 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56678 Mary S. Thompson 346.00 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56679 Steven M. Thornburg 462.79 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56680 Joseph F. Vallone 215.87 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56681 Marco Polo S. Velasco 517.76 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56682 Michael Vuong 530.47 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 56683 Thomas Walker 276.63 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56684 Lawrence A. \Mgington 333.30 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56685 Robyn A. VVilcox 256.82 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56686 Morris C. Ying 253.69 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 56687 K & K, Inc. 2,164.36 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 56688 Maclay TR 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 56689 Orange County Sanitation District 957.02 Petty Cash Reimb. fin/21onc G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARBClalms Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -101503.xls Page 8of10 EXHIBIT.A 11/1012003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03to10115/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56690 Wild Rivers Waterpark 1,629.00 Employee Deposit Transfer 56691 Orange County Sanitation District 610,729.60 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 56692 Orange County Water District 801,877.05 Construction -Joint GV\rRS Project J-36 56693 Orange County Sanitation District 33,627.28 Workefs Comp. Reimb. 56694 Allied Packing & Rubber, Inc. 1,937.67 Plumbing Supplies 56695 American Airlines 1,761.00 Travel Services 56696 Association of Calif. Water Agencies 190.00 Communications Training Registration 56697 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 62.09 Telephone Service 56698 Boxwood Technology, Inc. 125.00 Notices&Ads 56699 BAF Industries 1,531.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56700 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 56701 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 27.07 Plumbing Supplies 56702 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 56703 Dawson Company 844.45 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56704 Dept. of Fish & Game 127.25 Permit -SARI Line Maint. 56705 Electra-Bond, Inc. 80.81 Valve Coating 56706 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,898.20 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care 56707 Employers Group 220.00 On-Site Performance Review Training 56708 Engineering Central 49.99 Notices&Ads 56709 Carla Louise Eroles 445.00 Wage Garnishment 56710 City of Fountain Valley 1,129.00 Building Permit -J-89 56711 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 56712 Franchise Tax Board 175.00 Wage Garnishment 56713 City of Fullerton 225.53 Water Use 56714 Graybar Electric Company 114.06 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56715 City of Huntington Beach 24,036.44 Water Use 56716 Industrial Metal Supply 139.30 Metal 56717 Internal Revenue Service 450.00 Wage Garnishment 56718 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng. AFL-CIO Local 501 3,691.78 Dues Deduction 56719 Ionics Instrument Business Group 421.39 Lab Parts & Supplies 56720 Jaco Electronics 5.08 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56721 John Mangiapane 300.00 Repair Service -Trawl Nets 56722 Maintenance Technology Corp 39.30 Hardware 56723 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 340.36 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56724 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 6,961.00 Repairs & Maintenance Service 56725 Milltronics c/o RMB Engineering 4,180.58 Electrical Supplies 56726 The Mission Viejo News, Inc. 1,014.00 Notices&Ads 56727 Moody's Investor's Service 5,500.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 56728 Moreland & Associates 3,501.00 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 56729 National Bond & Trust 2,045.44 U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 56730 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 982.60 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 56731 OCEA 561.61 Dues Deduction 56732 Pacific Bell/WorldCom 15.59 Telephone Service 56733 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 56734 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 56735 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,566.00 Dues Deduction 56736 PenValve 260.04 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 56737 Pleion Corp. #2 801.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56738 Primavera Systems, Inc. 3,840.00 Software Maint. 56739 PAPA 110.00 0 & M Training Registration 56740 RBC Transport Dynamics 808.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56741 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 156.60 Mechanical Parts & Supplies fin/21onc G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-101503.xls Page 9of10 EXHIBIT A 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 56742 Court Order 56743 So. Cal. Gas Company 56744 South Bay Chrome Sales 567 45 Southern California Edison 567 46 State Board of Equalization 56747 SBC 56748 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 567 49 The Unisource Corporation 56750 United Way 56751 Verizon California 56752 XZX Electronics, Inc. 56753 Marc A. Brown 56754 Keith W. Criscuolo 56755 Thomas D. DoDderer 56756 Mark A. Esquer 56757 Tim H. Hopkins 56758 John D. Linder 56759 Henry E. Lorimer 56760 Robert Michna 56761 Fred J. O'Brien 56762 Robert Ooten 56763 Rory Rea 56764 Brian K. Reed 56765 Douglas M. Stewart 56766 Michael D. Wlite 56767 Hughes Associates, Inc. Total Accounts Payable -Warrants Payroll Disbursements 31184 -31271 Employee Paychecks 31272-31382 Employee Paychecks 31383 -31392 Interim Paychecks 90006 -90504 Direct Deposit Statements 90505 -91014 Direct Deposit Statements Total Payroll Disbursements Wire Transfer Payments fin121onc JP Morgan Chase Bank JP Morgan Chase Bank Total Wire Transfer Payments Total Claims Paid 10/01/03-10/15/03 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03 Amount 721.50 24,269.17 23.55 1,390.21 208.91 20.54 1,558.44 555.19 305.00 6,267.51 59.06 404.30 46.00 461.73 144.39 116.00 230.00 251.74 102.33 320.75 298.02 112.50 366.68 130.24 250.00 12,478.80 $ 8,742,861.69 $ 135,318.44 156,703.39 103,262.35 874,737.10 938,456.31 $ 2,208,477.59 $ 30,076.66 131,284.25 $ 161,360.91 $ 11,112,700.19 Description Wage Garnishment Natural Gas Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Power Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee Telephone Services Mechanical Supplies Office Supplies Employee Contributions Telephone Services Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement Prof. Services J-33-1 A Biweekly Payroll 10/01 /03 Biweekly Payroll 10115103 Retroactive Salary Adjustments, IDEA Awards & Payroll Adjustment Biweekly Payroll 10101 /03 Biweekly Payroll 10/15/03 September Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation September Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation G:\excef.c:fta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-101503.xls Page 10of10 EXHIBIT,.A 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor Accounts Payable -Warrants 56768 Atkins Americas, Inc. 56769 Basic Chemical Solutions, L.L.C. 56770 Bell Land Surveying 56771 Black & Veatch Corporation 56772 Brown & Caldwell 56773 City of Huntington Beach 56774 City of Santa Ana 56775 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 56776 Environmental Science Associates 56777 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 56778 Hill Brothers 56779 Jazz Semiconductor 56780 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 56781 Kforce, Inc. 56782 Knott's Berry Farm Foods 56783 Lee & Ro, Inc. 56784 Municipal water Dist. of Orange County 56785 MDS Consulting 56786 Partners Consulting Services 56787 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 56788 Polydyne, Inc. 56789 Southern Contracting Company 56790 SPS Technologies 56791 The Trane Company 56792 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 56793 U.S. Peroxide 56794 J R Filanc Construction 56795 J F Shea Construction, Inc. 56796 Margate Construction, Inc. 56797 eSysTek 56798 Abrasive Engineering Tool & Equipment 56799 Accurate Circuit Engineering 56800 Accurate Metal Fabricators. Inc. 56801 Accutite Fasteners, Inc. 56802 Adamson Industries 56803 Advance Tech Plating #2 56804 Advanced Measurements & Controls, Inc. 56805 Air Industries Corporation 56806 Air Industries 56807 Air Liquide America Corp. 56808 Airco Filter Service 56809 Airgas -West 56810 Airgas Safety, Inc. 56811 All Metal Paint Stripping Inc. #2 56812 Allied Pacific Metal Stamping 56813 Alloy Die casting 56814 Almatron Electronics G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Clalms Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -103103.xls fin121onc $ Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03 Amount Description 32,900.00 Professional Services J-40-6 32,133.49 Sodium Bisulfite 47,575.07 Professional Surveying Services -Various Capital Projects 107,862.06 Engineering Services J-77, J-87, P1-46-2 & P1-76 86,483.64 Professional Services 1-98 767,556.75 Cooperative Projects Reimbursements 271,000.00 Cooperative Projects Reimbursements 67,118.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98 51,383.21 Professional Services J-40-5 40,758.77 Long-Term & Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium 28,522.19 Chemicals -Odor & Corrosion Control -Newport Trunkline 43,682.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 258,277.86 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 41,927.76 Temporary Employment Services 41,290.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 38,397.89 Professional Services 5-50, 5-51 & 5-52 341,337.44 water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 25,277.01 Prof. Services -Surveying Various Capital Projects 28,200.00 FIS On-Site Support -One World XE Migration Project 455,093.45 Sodium Hypochlorite 73,010.72 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 45,164.00 Construction J-33-1 31,588.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 37,066.00 Heating & Air Conditioning Installation 152,106.30 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 322,558.29 Hydrogen Peroxide 1,656,973.44 Construction P1-76 1, 17 4,230. 73 Construction P2-85, J-87 & J-35-2 1,858,289.00 Construction P1-37 480.00 Software 91.32 Hardware 666.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 324.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 114.21 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 1,805.68 Lab Parts & Supplies 44.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 3,868.00 Instrument Parts & Supplies 1,064.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 7,253.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 763.13 Specialty Gases 539.27 Fuel Filters 6.60 Oemurrage 9,031.07 Safety Supplies & Equipment 2,607.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 881.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 604.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 471.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 1of10 EXHIBITS 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 56815 Alum-A-Therm 56816 Aluminum Forge 56817 Amcor -Sunclipse, Inc. 56818 American Express 56819 American Fildelity Assurance Company 56820 American Public Works Association 56821 Amerimax Building Products, Inc. 56822 Ametek Aerospace 56823 Anaheim Extrusion Co., Inc. 56824 Anaheim General Hospital 56825 City of Anaheim -water Services 56826 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 56827 Appleone Employment Service 56828 Aqua-Con 56829 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs, Inc. 56830 Arnold Electronics #1 56831 Arrowhead Products 56832 Autodesk University/Enterprise Events 56833 API Basco 56834 APW Enclosure Systems 56835 APW Enclosure Systems, LLC (South St) 56836 ARO Services 56837 ASSE American Soc. of Safety Engineers 56838 AVVSI 56839 B. Braun Medical, Inc. 56840 Basic Chemical Solutions 56841 Battery Specialties 56842 Bauer Compressors 56843 Bazz Houston Co. 56844 Bearing Inspection, Inc. 56845 Beckman Coulter, Inc. 56846 BioMerieux Vitek, Inc. 56847 Boeing -Anaheim 56848 Boeing Company, The 56849 Bondlogistix, L.L.C. 56850 Brenntag West, Inc. 56851 Brenton Safety, Inc. 56852 Bristol Industries 56853 Bush & Associates, Inc. 56854 Cal-Aurum Industries 56855 Cal-Glass, Inc. 56856 Cal-Tronics Circuit Inc. -Santa Ana 56857 California Automatic Gate 56858 California Bank & Trust 56859 Caltrol, Inc. 56860 Cardlock Fuels 56861 Cargill, Inc. 56862 Carl Warren & Co. G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARBClalms Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -103103.xls fin121onc Claims Paid From 10/16/03to10/31/03 Amount 109.04 1,630.15 3,811.57 23,160.17 132.00 520.00 830.38 18.82 176.24 122.35 11,064.88 865.00 12,295.33 600.51 1,550.00 4,504.38 4,286.82 1,245.00 2,310.51 3,545.07 1,642.45 146.24 570.00 166.00 7,357.02 1,880.69 261.83 152.46 732.53 89.75 7,296.62 219.75 12,822.76 9,324.21 8,100.00 1,000.78 334.03 1,644.12 4,264.00 5.32 80.60 128.36 782.19 5,018.00 323.25 1,093.38 21.45 514.22 Description Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Purchasing Card Program, Misc. Supplies & Services Employee Voluntary Cancer Insurance Communication Meeting Registration/O&M Membership Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Lab Supplies Temporary Employment Services Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Toxicity Testing Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Planning Meeting Registration Electrical Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Safety & Health Meeting Registration Department of Transportation Training Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Sodium Bisulfrte Batteries Compressor Parts Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Lab Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Prof. Serv. -Preparation of Interim Arbitrage Rebate Report Series 2000B COPs Janitorial Supplies Safety Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Lab Equipment Maint. Service Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Automatic Gate Maintenance -Both Plants Construction J-33-1A, Retention Mechanical Parts, Supplies & Repairs Fueling District Vehicles at Local Gas Stations Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Insurance Claims Administrator Page 2of10 EXHIBITJ3 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 56863 Carleton Engineers & Consultants, Inc. 56864 Carollo Engineers 56865 Catalina Cylinders 56866 Cell2Cell 56867 Center for Creative Growth 56868 Chapman Hospital 56869 Cheek Engineering & Stamping 56870 City of La Habra 56871 City of Los Alamitos 56872 Cleugh's Rhubarb 56873 Clickguard Corporation 56874 Coast Fire Equipment 56875 Color Arts, Inc. 56876 Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 56877 Huntington Beach Medical Center 56878 Columbia West Anaheim Medical Center 56879 Commercial Roof Management, Inc. 56880 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 56881 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 56882 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 56883 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 56884 Control Factors-Seattle, Inc. 56885 Coordinated VVire Rope & Rigging 56886 Corporate Express Imaging 56887 Corporate Express 56888 Cortech Engineering 56889 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 56890 County 'M'lolesale Electric Co. 56891 Crescent Chemical Co., Inc. 56892 Criterion Machine Works 56893 Crockett Container Corp. 56894 Custom Control Sensors 56895 CEPA Company 56896 CR&R, Inc. 56897 CRC RIM, Inc. 56898 CWEA Membership 56899 Dapper Tire Co. 56900 Data Aire, Inc. 56901 Day Wireless Systems 56902 Del Mar Analytical 56903 Delphi Automotive Systems, L.L.C. 56904 Derm Cosmetic Labs, Inc. 56905 Diamond H Recognition 56906 DigiPhoto 56907 Dionex Corporation 56908 Ditty Drum Co., Inc. 56909 Ducommun Aerostructures 56910 Dunn-Edwards Corporation G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARBClalms Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -103103.xls fin/21onc Claims Paid From 10/16/03to10/31/03 Amount 175.01 14,419.53 2,635.81 52.09 2,300.00 348.19 826.16 4,500.00 4,649.06 18,357.62 158.25 226.09 1,210.40 1,100.00 197.09 951.93 2,000.00 9,200.00 2,984.90 3,205.52 314.06 994.80 295.02 345.83 925.55 3,934.22 130.57 9.09 260.72 897.94 1,885.46 121.02 223.28 2,205.00 6,988.46 231.00 587.95 1,212.87 1,050.00 2,136.00 17,310.13 1,878.66 72.44 10.95 1,895.21 93.13 3,813.53 37.93 Description Engineering Services -Air Quality Professional Services P1-60 & P2-60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Communication Equipment Professional Services -O & M Management Coaching Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Cooperative Projects Reimbursements Connection Fee Duplicate Payment Refund Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Printer Service Agreement Fire Extinguisher Maintenance & Service Vehicle Decals Analyses of Wastewater, Industrial Wastewater & Biosolids Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Skylight Replacement Prof. Serv. -Rev. to Elec. Emerg. Oper. Procedures at Pit. 1 & Load Shedding Proc. at Pit. 2 Computer Maintenance Electrical Supplies Plumbing Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Rigging Supplies Computer Supplies Office Supplies Pump Supplies Cen Gen Air Filters Electrical Parts & Supplies Lab Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Electrical Supplies Lab Equipment Maint. Service Container Rentals Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Membership -Calif. Water Environment Assoc. Truck Tires Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Professional Services -Microwave System Repairs Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Employee Service Awards Photographic Services Lab Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Paint Supplies Page 3of10 EXHIBITS 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 56911 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 56912 Eaton Corporation/MSC Products 56913 El Metate, Inc. 56914 Electro Numerics, Inc. 56915 Electro-Test, Inc. 56916 Embee, Inc. #1 56917 Embee, Inc. #2 56918 Embee, Inc. #3 56919 Empire Pipe Cleaning & Equipment, Inc. 56920 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 56921 Enchanter, Inc. 56922 Engravers Ink Company 56923 Environmental Express 56924 Environmental Microbiology Consulting 56925 Environmental Resource Association 56926 Fabrication Concepts Corporation 56927 FedEx Corporation 56928 Fineline Circuits & Tech. 56929 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 56930 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 56931 Foodcraft Coffee & Refreshment Services 56932 Fountain Valley Camera 56933 Franklin Covey 56934 Fry's Electronics 56935 Fullerton Plating 56936 FMH Investor Group 56937 Gardner Lithograph OOB'D 7/31/03 56938 Garratt-Callahan Company 56939 Getinge Castle 56940 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 56941 Golden State Controls 56942 Gomtech Electronics 56943 Gorilla's Polishing and Plating Corp. 56944 Grafix Training & Consulting 56945 Graybar Electric Company 56946 Guy L. Warden & Sons 56947 H Koch&Sons 56948 Hamilton Materials 56949 Harbor Truck Bodies, Inc. 56950 Harold Primrose Ice 56951 Harte-Hanks Shoppers 56952 The Hartwell Corporation 56953 Hasco Oil Co., Inc. 56954 Hawk Industrial Uniform 56955 Heat Technology Products 56956 Hilti, Inc. 56957 The Holman Group 56958 Home Depot G:\excel.dta\fln\220\APSHARBClalms Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -103103.xls fin/210Ac Claims Paid From 10/16/03to10/31/03 Amount Description 916.96 Electrical Supplies 2,009.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 5,827.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 1,417.03 Electrical Supplies 2,100.00 Professional Services-Electrical Acceptance Testing 1,480.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 206.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 1,179.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 15,240.38 Sewer Line Cleaning & Testing 607.60 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care 3,600.00 Ocean Monitoring & Outfall Inspection & Maintenance 32.90 Reimbursed User Fee Refund Program 99.88 Lab Supplies 7,310.00 Professional Services J-40-6 1,162.90 Lab Supplies 4,148.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 100.59 Air Freight 49.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 7,065.07 Lab Parts & Supplies 135.00 Concrete Cutting 732.25 Meeting Supplies 9.84 Photographic Services 94.55 Office Supplies 115.97 Computer Supplies 102.69 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 2,956.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 1,279.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 113.14 Chemicals 532.00 Lab Instrument Maintenance 6,605.08 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 358.14 Electrical Parts & Supplies 216.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 215.00 On-Site Acrobat Training 14,481.60 Computer Software/Hardware 302.09 Pump Supplies 2,569.83 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 972.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 106.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 74.00 Ice For Samples 4,724.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 507.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 193.73 Lube Oil 1,009.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 10,469.14 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 1,092.55 Tools 897.48 Employee Assistance Program Premium 1,271.64 Misc. Repair & Maintenance Material Page 4of10 EXHIBIT f3 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 56959 Hub Auto Supply 56960 Hyatt Die Casting & Engineering Corp. 56961 Industrial Distribution Group 56962 Industrial Metal Supply 56963 Intergraph Corporation 56964 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 56965 Invensys Systems, Inc. 56966 Irvine Pipe & Supply 56967 Irvine Ranch Water District 56968 Irvine Sensors Corp. 56969 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 56970 Jay's Catering 56971 Jefferson Smurfit Corp. (U.S.) 56972 Jellco Container, Inc. 56973 Johnson Controls Inc. 56974 Johnstone Supply 56975 Kelly Paper 56976 Kenlen Specialities, Inc. 56977 Kent Automotive 56978 Kirkhill Rubber 56979 Kirkhill Rubber Company (South) 56980 KCA Electronics, Inc. 56981 KW Communications 56982 Leach Corp. 56983 Los Angeles Times 56984 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 56985 M.S. Bellows 56986 Marden Susco, Inc. 56987 Margaretis Textile Service 56988 Mark Optics, Inc. 56989 Maruchan, Inc. 56990 Mask Technology, Inc. 56991 Material Control, Inc. 56992 Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, L.L.P. 56993 Mc Junkin Corp-Ontario Branch 56994 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 56995 Mead Westvaco Packaging 56996 Mee Analytical System 56997 Medeva Pharmaceuticals CA, Inc. 56998 Medlin Controls Co. 56999 Medtronic Heartvalve Division, Inc. 57000 Mesa Consolidated Water District 57001 Michael Asner Consulting 57002 Micrometals, Inc. #2 57003 MicroSemi 57004 Microsemi lntergrated Products 57005 Mid-West Associates 57006 Midway Mfg. & Machining Co. G:\excel.cfta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report-103103.xls fin121onc Claims Paid From 10/16/03to10/31/03 Amount 247.77 1,853.01 481.33 120.15 387.90 1,016.19 362.60 756.44 41.70 4,222.30 11,128.03 3,122.52 2,261.68 1,092.65 11,899.64 696.56 99.51 130.85 326.31 2,689.03 11,215.28 343.84 5,603.31 2,987.09 9,540.00 230.18 140.63 534.63 3,532.20 267.92 16,878.11 16.96 1,515.66 5,000.00 125.31 377.13 11,735.75 8,433.00 2,564.58 1,454.58 7,226.76 3,528.82 1,350.00 944.22 1,438.63 1,587.77 250.38 6,734.38 Description Vehicle Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Electrical & Painting Supplies Metal Software Maint. Agreement Batteries for Vehicles & Carts Instrument Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Water Use Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Prof. Services P2-74 & Various Repairs & Maintenance Services Meeting Expenses Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Electrical Supplies Paper Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Automotive Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Community Outreach Re Bushard Trunkline Replacement Project Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Meeting Expense Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Mechanical Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Mechanical Parts & Supplies Legislative Advocacy Services Plumbing Supplies Mechanical & Lab Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Toxicity Analysis Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Instrument Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Prof. Serv. -Develop RFP Handbook & Internal Policies & Procedures for Purchasing Div. Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Pump Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Page 5of10 EXHIBITB 11/1012003 Warrant No. Vendor 57007 Milbank \J\kst, Inc. 57008 Millett Industries 57009 Mission Uniform Service 57010 Monogram Systems 57011 Murrietta Circuits 57012 MAG-TROL, Inc. 57013 Nelco Products, Inc. 57014 NetVersant of Southern California 57015 Newark Electronics 57016 Newport Corporation 57017 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 57018 Ninyo & Moore Corporate Accounting 57019 The Norco Companies 57020 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 57021 Office Depot Business Services Div. 57022 OhmartNEGA Corp. 57023 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 57024 Ora Beth Scott 57025 Orange County Hose Company 57026 Orange Courier 57027 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 57028 Oxygen Service Company 57029 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 57030 Pacific Mechanical Supply 57031 Pacifica Aerospace Corp. 57032 Parker Hannifin Corporation 57033 Parker Supply Company 57034 Peak Technologies 57035 Pen Valve 57036 Pepsi-Cola Bottling 57037 Performance Powder, Inc. 57038 Perkin Elmer Corporation 57039 Perma Pure, Inc. 57040 Pico Farad, Inc. 57041 Pilkington Aerospace 57042 Pitney Bowes 57043 Powdercoat Services 57044 Powdercoat Services #2 57045 Powdercoat Services #4 57046 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 57047 Precision Painting 57048 California Fineblanking Corp. 57049 Precon, Inc. 57050 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 57051 Propipe 57052 Prudential Overall Supply 57053 Pure Chem Products Co. 57054 Putzmeister -America G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Clalms Paid Report-103103.xls fin/210/lc Claims Paid From 10116/03to10/31/03 Amount 385.03 146.51 2,973.08 2,813.77 463.98 2,998.68 2,522.89 3,675.43 331.38 11,007.63 1,069.17 10,081.16 170.78 269.10 1,012.42 2,133.18 353.78 76.51 33.60 189.00 1,646.64 2,469.99 1,027.94 560.90 1,867.43 126.01 1,268.92 2,485.90 426.75 9,139.89 93.85 474.67 217.22 838.96 10,564.63 538.35 88.73 287.64 25.62 232.12 731.86 204.76 104.31 15,435.19 815.30 135.22 111.76 328.79 Description Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Uniform Rentals Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Electrical Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Installation of Camera at GV\.RS Gate -J-36 Electrical Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Machine Oil Professional Services-Materials Testing, Inspection & Geotechnical Engineering Mail Delivery Service Steel Tags Office Supplies Freight -Hazardous Materials Electrical Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Hose Supplies & Parts Courier Services Plumbing Parts & Supplies Specialty Gases Electrical Supplies Plumbing Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Mechanical Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Lab Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Lab Parts & Supplies Filters Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Repairs & Maintenance Service -Pitney Bowes Letter Opener Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Electrical Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Office Furniture CCTV Sewerline Inspection Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Mechanical Parts & Supplies Page 6of10 EXHIBITS 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 57055 PC Magazine 57056 PCG Industries 57057 PSI 57058 Quality Aluminum Forge 57059 R. W. Beck 57060 R. L. Abbott & Associates 57061 Railmakers, Inc. 57062 Rainbow Disposal Co. 57063 Rainin Instrument, L.L.C. 57064 Reid Metal Finishing 57065 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 57066 RemedyTemp, Inc. 57067 Retrofit Parts & Components, Inc. 57068 Revere Transducers 57069 Ricoh Business System 57070 Ricoh Electronics #2 57071 Rigiflex Technology, Inc. 57072 RBF Consulting 57073 RM Automation c/o RM Controls 57074 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 57075 RTR Industries, L.LC. 57076 S & J Supply Co., Inc. 57077 Safety-Kleen 57078 Sancen Engineering, Inc. 57079 Santana Services 57080 Scientific Spray Finishes 57081 Scisorek & Sons Flavors, Inc. 57082 Sechrist Industries Inc. 57083 Semicoa 57084 Serrano Water District 57085 Shepard Brothers, Inc. 57086 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 57087 Siemens Building Technologies 57088 Sierra Spring Water 57089 Sioux Honey Assoc Co-op 57090 Snap-On Tools, Inc. 57091 So California Edison 57092 SoftChoice 57093 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 57094 South Coast Circuits, Inc. 57095 South Coast Oil Company 57096 Sparkletts 57097 St. John Knits, Inc. 57098 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 57099 Summit Steel 57100 Sunclipse, Inc. I Corru Kraft 57101 Sunset Ford 57102 Sunset Industrial Parts G:\excel.c!ta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Clalms Paid Report-103103.xls fin/21onc Clalms Paid From 10/16/03to10/31/03 Amount 69.97 1,675.00 325.54 426.53 976.80 3,000.00 40.79 5,826.40 119.53 391.33 9,925.22 3,219.66 652.19 512.60 16.18 6,044.56 144.72 24,459.69 97.39 50.88 590.10 137.52 485.66 3,450.00 19.96 80.25 1,565.68 983.92 281.14 660.61 9,272.07 987.84 145.00 933.51 11,818.77 148.85 1,656.63 2,715.04 3,349.44 654.02 193.14 1,522.17 10,991.48 510.00 101.25 21,441.08 81.39 158.41 Description Subscription Mechanical Repairs & Maintenance Service Plumbing Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Professional Services P1-90 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Trash Removal Lab Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Employee Life Ins. Premium, Short-Term Disability & Cancer Ins. Payroll Deductions Temporary Employment Services Mechanical Parts & Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Color Copier Lease & Maintenance Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Engineering Services 2-41 Instrument Supplies Paint Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Plumbing Parts & Supplies Parts Washer Lease & Service Construction -Manhole Raising on Ellis Ave. Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Mechanical Parts & Supplies Professional Services -Admin Bldg. Automation System Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Tools Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Software Annual Emission, Operation & Misc. Fees Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Carpet Cleaning Services Metal Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Auto Parts & Service Mechanical Supplies Page 7of10 ..... EXHIBITS 11/1012003 Warrant No. Vendor 57103 Symcas-TSG 57104 South Coast Environmental Co. 57105 SKC-West, Inc. 57106 SPX Valves & Control 57107 Tac West, Inc. 57108 Taormina Industries, Inc. 57109 Taormina Industries, Inc. #4 57110 Taylor-Dunn 57111 Teletrac, Inc. 57112 Terminix International Co. #2474 57113 Tetra Tech, Inc. 57114 Textron Aerospace 57115 The Walking Man, Inc. 57116 Thermal-Vac Technology 57117 Thermco Systems, Inc. 57118 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 57119 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 57120 Tierra Tractor 57121 Times Community News 57122 Tony's Lock & Safe Service & Sales 57123 Townsend Public Affairs 57124 Toytoa Racing Development #2 57125 Transline Technology, Inc. 57126 Trim-Lok 57127 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. 57128 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 57129 City of Tustin Water Service 57130 Teksystems 57131 TTM Technologies, Inc. 57132 US Filter Corporation 57133 U.W.M.C. Hospital Corp. -Anaheim 57134 Ultra Scientific 57135 Ultra Wheel Company 57136 United Circuit Technology 57137 United Parcel Service 57138 Universal Circuits, Inc. 57139 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 57140 Vapex, Inc. 57141 Velie Circuits, Inc. 57142 Vencor, Inc. 57143 Verne's Plumbing 57144 Villa Park Orchards Assoc. 57145 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 57146 West American Rubber Company 57147 Weyerhauser Company 57148 V\Anonics 57149 V\Anonics (Brea) 57150 'Mntec, L.L.C. G:\excel.dta\fln\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Clalms Paid Report-103103.xls ftn121onc Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03 Amount 1,381.60 7,193.02 832.72 2,265.33 2,988.01 169.26 379.31 3,995.61 245.00 385.00 2,260.93 3,847.24 1,050.00 9.75 996.00 4,914.12 2,321.00 2,700.00 106.25 76.70 5,000.00 1,560.45 27.66 234.41 103.26 50.00 4,268.41 20,915.00 279.80 280.00 244.19 122.50 538.82 1,173.54 27.19 860.64 12,440.00 11,296.00 1,003.77 8,797.52 7,498.25 777.88 2,899.95 7,666.50 20,661.45 1,760.14 54.63 39.18 Description SCADA System VAX Service Agreement Cen Gen Emissions Testing Service Safety Supplies Valves Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Electric Cart Parts Monthly Air-Time Service Fee & Software/Hardware Maint. For Vehicle Tracking Sys. Pest Control Professional Services 7-37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Public Outreach Program -Bushard Project Door Hangers Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Mechanical Supplies Elevator Maintenance Tree Planting Services Notices & Ads Locks & Keys Legislative & Executive Advocate for Grant Funding Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Truck & Auto Parts Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Temporary Employment Services Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Service Agreement -Lab Purification System Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Lab Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Parcel Services Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Temporary Employment Service Instrument Parts, Supplies & Maintenance Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Service Contract -Backflow Device Repairs & Lab Waterline Repairs Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Lab Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 8of10 EXHIBIT I' 11/10/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 57151 Xerox Corp -OMNI 57152 Xerox Corporation 57153 Zymark Corporation 57154 Deon M. Carrico 57155 Marilyn M. Farnsworth 57156 Victoria L. Henn 57157 Orange County Sanitation District 57158 Airgas Safety 57159 ASSE American Soc. of Safety Engineers 57160 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 57161 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 57162 AT & T \Mreless Services -Airtime 57163 BNB Engineering, Inc. 57164 Carl Warren & Co. 57165 Center For Urban lnfrasructure Comm. 57166 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 57167 Compressor Components of California 57168 Corporate Express 57169 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 57170 Court Trustee 57171 CPI International 57172 CWEA-SARBS, Inc. 57173 Department of Motor Vehicles 57174 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 57175 Five Star Metals, Inc. 57176 Franchise Tax Board 57177 Internal Revenue Service 57178 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 57179 League Of CA Cities 57180 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 57181 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 57182 Mobile Air Conditioning Society 57183 Michael D. Moore 57184 National Bond & Trust 57185 The Orange County Register 57186 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 57187 OCEA 57188 Parker Hannifin Corporation 57189 Pen Valve 57190 Platecorp #2 57191 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 57192 Ricoh Electronics 57193 Tod W. Ridgeway 57194 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 57195 Society for HR Management 57196 South Coast Circuits #4 57197 Southern California Edison 57198 Spinitar G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -103103.xls fin121onc Claims Paid From 10116/03 to 10/31/03 Amount Descrl(:!tlon 21.00 Fax Lease 11,620.94 Fax & Copier Leases 10,000.00 Service Agreement -Lab Zymate Robotic System 298.65 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 404.30 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 116.68 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 911.98 Petty Cash Reimb. 305.03 Safety Supplies & Equipment 1,120.00 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 1,252.58 Telephone Service 393.27 Telephone Service 301.92 Cellular Airtime 1,328.00 Construction 11-22 305.65 Insurance Claims Administrator 215.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 7,900.00 Prof. Serv. -Develop Chemical Emergency Operating Procedures 5,301.30 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 83.68 Office Supplies 33.00 Encroachment Permit 7-36 69.12 Wage Garnishment 748.87 Lab Supplies 65.00 Operations Meeting Registration 127.00 Vehicle Registration 7,898.20 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care 343.70 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 100.00 Wage Garnishment 450.00 Wage Garnishment 12,714.30 Professional Services -Removal of Caustic Tank at Scrubbers H & I 435.00 Membership 2,510.56 Plumbing Parts, Supplies & Tools 2,160.39 Professional Services -Install (3) Liners In Air Compressor Cylinders 200.00 Membership 224.98 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 2,045.44 U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 11,360.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 188.24 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 580.11 Dues Deduction 58.43 Regulator Filters 224.91 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 170.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 10,715.79 Office Furniture 270.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 383.75 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 80.91 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 160.00 Membership 1,845.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 34.60 Power 25.00 Freight Page 9of10 EXHIBITS 11/10/2003 .. Warrant No. Vendor 57199 Summit Steel 57200 SBC 57201 United way 57202 Valverde Construction, Inc. 57203 Verizon California 57204 Verteq Process Systems 57205 Michael J. Barrett 57206 Shabbir S. Basrai 57207 Michael J. Boess 57208 JamesM. Elo 57209 Darrell S. Ennis 57210 Mila S. Kleinbergs 57211 Matthew P. Smith 57212 Morris C. Ying 57213 Amezcua, Gerardo 57214 Castillo, Mark & Fry's Electronics 57215 McElroy, Tomm 57216 Ralph, Allen 57217 Grande Tortilla 57218 Orange County Business Council 57219 Orange County Sanitation District 57220 Southern California Edison 57221 Unity Constructors Total Accounts Payable -Warrants Payroll Disbursements 31393-31482 Employee Paychecks 91015 -91516 Direct Deposit Statements Total Payroll Disbursements Wire Transfer Payments U.S. Bank Total Wire Transfer Payments Total Claims Paid 10/16/03 -10/31/03 G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -103103.xls fin/21onc Clalms Paid From 10/16/03to10/31/03 Amount Description 461.16 Metal 1,092.63 305.00 5,319.14 1,185.81 870.06 144.26 137.93 297.60 167.52 202.65 267.80 1,502.93 1,893.41 2,095.13 1,520.00 1,214.85 2,064.68 30,414.84 50,000.00 680,065.30 139,346.46 6,572.30 Telephone Services Employee Contributions Construction -Sewerline Repairs at Newport Beach Telephone Services Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Meeting!Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting!Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting!Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Acoustic Enclosure for Ultrasonic Test Unit Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Employee Computer Loan Program Employee Computer Loan Program Employee Computer Loan Program Employee Computer Loan Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Membership Payroll EFT Reimbursement Power Construction 7-14-4, Retention $ 10,103,534.83 $ $ $ $ 143,151.92 944,946.00 1,088,097.92 178,639.96 178,639.96 $ 11,370,272. 71 Biweekly Payroll 10129/03 Biweekly Payroll 10129/03 October Interest Payment on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Page 10of10 EXHIBIT .a_ _ •. 11/10/2003 .... BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd . of Dir. 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 8 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed , Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane , Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party . For reference , you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the Dist rict. In general, you must disclose the basis of the conflict by identifying the name of the firm or individual who was the contributor. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308 , please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. SUMMARY See attached listing. PRIOR COMMITIEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A ATIACHMENTS 1 . Copies of Claims Paid reports from 11 /01 /03-11 /15/03 and 11/16/03-11 /30/03 C:\Documents and Settings\po pe\Local Settings\ Temporary Intern et Fil es\OLKBF\ltem 8.ClaimsPaid.doc Revised : 06/04/03 Warrant No. Vendor Accounts Payable -warrants 57222 Air Products & Chemicals 57223 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 57224 AMSA 57225 Basic Chemical Solutions, L.L.C. 57226 Black & Veatch Corporation 57227 Brown & Caldwell 57228 CH2M Hill 57229 Dell Computer 57230 Environmental Engineering & Contracting 57231 IPMC c/o Parsons 57232 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 57233 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 57234 Lee & Ro, Inc. 57235 Little Hoquiam Shipyard 57236 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 57237 Orange County Water District 57238 Oved Dagan Construction Co. 57239 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 57240 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 57241 Southern California Edison 57242 Trojan Technologies, Inc. 57243 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 57244 U.S. Metro Group, Inc. 57245 U.S. Peroxide 57246 Union Bank of California 57247 The Wackenhut Corporation 57248 Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart 57249 ARB, Inc. 57250 Cora Constructors 57251 Steve P Rados, Inc. 57252 AccuStandard, Inc. 57253 Advance Business Graphics 57254 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 57255 Airborne Express 57256 Airgas Safety, Inc. 57257 American Fildelity Assurance Company 57258 American Society of Civil Engineers 57259 American Training Resources, Inc. 57260 Ametek Process & Analytical Instruments 57261 Arnot Control Corporation 57262 Aquarium Doctor 57263 Arch Wireless 57264 Arizona Instrument 57265 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 57266 AT & T Wireless Services 57267 AT&T Wireless-TITAN 57268 AT&T Wireless Services fin121onc Claims Paid From 11/01/03 to 11/15/03 Amount $ 26,294.06 68,895.33 29,043.50 36,603.38 59,143.90 84,523.58 108,725.27 25,150.00 54,000.00 1,032,831.00 40,551.29 133,000.80 31,156.52 260,000.00 109,987.34 91,065.37 61,497.90 26,506.58 222,681.71 39,034.70 27,799.50 225,793.14 63,749.00 39,092.90 44,568.40 30,318.95 103,591.59 607,370.71 25,605.00 401, 115.60 390.65 484.88 1,817.05 167.97 424.34 66.00 640.00 537.31 1,705.49 849.72 97.90 1,596.65 689.00 95.44 4,489.09 9.14 3,014.80 Description 0 & M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 Professional Services J-73-2 Source Control Meeting Registration & Membership Sodium Bisulfite Engineering Services P1-76, P2-85, J-71-3 & Door/Bldg. Specifications Professional Services P1-37, 2-41 & 0 & M Standard Operating Procedures Manual Professional Services J-40-7 ( 1) Mail Server On-Site Training -Advanced wastewater Treatment Operator Course I Professional Services -Program Project Management, Materials/Supplies & Temp. Staff Construction -Repair of Natural Gas Line at Plant 2 Maintenance Building Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 Professional Services 5-50, 5-51, 5-52 & P1-93 Ocean Monitoring Research Vessel Professional Services J-79 & 1-10 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 Construction J-90 Electrical Supplies Sodium Hypochlorite Power Professional Services J-40-6 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 Janitorial & Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 & 2 Prof. Serv. -Coll. Sys. Odor & Corrosion Study and Hydro. Peroxide & Ferrous Chloride Construction 1-2-4, Retention Security Guards Legal Services MO 7-26-95 Construction 11-22 Construction 7-7-2 Construction 1-2-4 Lab Supplies Stationery MSD Data Analysis Software & Lab Parts & Supplies Air Freight Safety Supplies Employee Cancer Insurance Premiums Membership Safety Video Instrument Parts & Supplies Electrical Parts & Supplies Aquarium Maintenance at Human Resources Building Airtime, Service & Equipment Instrument Repairs & Calibration Services Telephone Service Cellular Air Time Cellular Phones & Accessories Wireless Phone Services J-73-2 G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -111503.xls Page 1of8 EXHIBIT A 121312003 Claims Paid From 11/01/03 to 11115/03 Warrant No. _v_e_n_do_r ___________ _ fin/210/lc 57269 BakerTanks 57270 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 57271 Battery Specialties 57272 Borthwick,Guy,Bettenhausen 57273 Brithinee Electric 5727 4 Peter H. Brown 57275 Bush & Associates, Inc. 57276 BC Wire Rope & Rigging 57277 C.S.U.F. Foundation 57278 Cal-Glass, Inc. 57279 California Brea Partners 57280 Cambridge Isotope Labs 57281 Cameron Environmental, Inc. 57282 Cameron Welding Supply 57283 Carollo Engineers 57284 Center For Urban lnfrasructure Comm Dsgn. 57285 Champion America 57286 Charles P. Crowley Co. 57287 Charts, Inc. 57288 Clickguard Corporation 57289 Coast Fire Equipment 57290 Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 57291 CompuMaster 57292 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 57293 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 57294 Corporate Express 57295 Corporate Image Maintenance, Inc. 57296 Cortech Engineering 57297 Cost Containment Solutions 57298 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 57299 County Wiolesale Electric Co. 57300 CASA 57301 CGvL Engineers 57302 CWEA Membership 57303 CWEA-SARBS, Inc. 57304 David's Tree Service 57305 Del Mar Analytical 57306 Denise De Benedetto 57307 Developers Insurance Company 57308 Diamond H Recognition 57309 Diehl, Evans & Co., L.L.P. 57310 Dionex Corporation 57311 Direct Safety Co. 57312 Doug Horwood Supply 57313 Douglass Truck Bodies, Inc. 57314 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 57315 Dynalco Corp 57316 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -111503.lds Amount 7,129.69 20,059.85 743.90 2,401.81 650.34 225.66 17,196.00 1,646.15 10,818.25 27.48 17,629.41 658.12 18,834.70 364.48 727.50 215.00 552.09 591.28 550.15 531.68 701.78 850.00 2,800.00 6,289.93 864.90 6,631.10 155.00 5,330.72 774.84 568.21 1,079.64 75.00 1,445.25 97.00 100.00 245.00 1,928.00 4,758.11 317.94 191.52 700.00 496.51 580.00 313.19 21,872.88 189.76 375.25 1,053.79 Description Tank Rentals Telephone Equipment Service & Semi-Annual Contract Batteries Professional Services P2-84 Instrument Parts & Supplies Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 Lab Parts & Supplies Membership -Center for Demographic Research Glass Repair Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Lab Parts & Supplies Professional Services -Odor Scrubbing System Welding Supplies Professional Services -Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study General Management Meeting Registration Smokers Cease Fire Receptacles Pump Parts & Supplies Instrument Supplies Printer Service Agreement Fire Extinguishers Analysis of Wastewater, Industrial Wastewater & Biosolids On-Site Word Training Electrical Supplies Plumbing Supplies Office Supplies Custodial Services Pump Parts & Supplies Worker's Comp. Services Maint. Agreement -Repair/Installation of Base, Handheld & Vehicle Radios Electrical Parts & Supplies Compliance Meeting Registration Engineering Services SP-74 Membership -Calif. Water Environment Assoc. Operations Meeting Registration Tree Maint. Service Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Employee Service Awards Accounting Training Registration Lab Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Repair & Maintenance Service on Mailroom Stamping Equipment Fabrication & Installation of (1) Custom Service Truck Body, Bedliner, Bumper & Lights Paint Supplies Instrument Maint. Service Electrical Supplies Page 2of8 EXHIBIT~ 121312003 ,.., Claims Paid From 11/01/03to11/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrl~tion 57317 Eagle Picher Industries, L.L.C. 253.72 Lab Parts & Supplies 57318 Electra-Bond, Inc. 775.80 Repairs & Maintenance Services -Belt Press Rollers 57319 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 550.00 Safety Video 57320 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 153.75 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care 57321 Enchanter, Inc. 2,700.00 Ocean Monitoring & Outfall Inspection & Maintenance 57322 EDT Aktiengesellschaft 8,443.25 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57323 ENS Resources, Inc. 15,000.00 Professional Services -Legislative Advocate 57324 F H Pumps, Inc. 420.18 Pump & Motor 57325 FedEx Corporation 236.76 Air Freight 57326 First American Real Estate Solutions 647.50 Orange County Property Information 57327 Fisher Scientific 5,411.17 Lab Parts & Supplies 57328 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 670.00 Concrete Cutting 57329 Foodcraft Coffee & Refreshment Services 257.95 Meeting Supplies 57330 Fountain Valley Camera 13.54 Photo Supplies 57331 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 376.80 Paint Supplies 57332 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 703.29 Truck Wash Tickets 57333 Franklin Covey 344.11 Office Supplies 57334 Fry's Electronics 80.80 Computer Supplies 57335 Infrared Training Center 3,090.00 Instrumentation & Electrical Maint. Training Registration 57336 Garratt-Callahan Company 7,198.73 Chemicals 57337 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 11,071.83 Belt Press Filter Parts & Supplies 57338 Golden State Controls 1,053.30 Tank Rehabilitation -Bacteria Reduction Program 57339 Grainger, Inc. 3,607.58 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57340 Graphic Controls 111.10 Office Supplies 57341 Graybar Electric Company 42.62 Electrical Parts & Supplies 57342 Guarantee Records Management 723.49 Off-Site Storage Services 57343 Haaker Equipment Company 1,934.45 Misc. Vehicle Parts, Repairs & Service 57344 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 427.90 Chemical Kits 57345 Harold Primrose Ice 129.50 Ice For Samples 57346 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 54.11 Plumbing Supplies 57347 Hill Brothers 16,489.14 Chemicals -Odor & Corrosion Control -Newport Trunkline 57348 Home Depot 285.60 Misc. Repair & Maintenance Material 57349 Hopkins Technical Products 192.61 Pump Supplies 57350 Hub Auto Supply 54.77 Vehicle Parts & Supplies 57351 Industrial Distribution Group 2,608.86 Mechanical & Painting Supplies 57352 Industrial Metal Supply 538.02 Metal 57353 IBM 6,202.56 Maintenance Agreement AS-400 57354 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 245.56 Batteries for Vehicles & Carts 57355 lnterNational Electrical Testing Assoc. 79.00 Publication 57356 Iron Mountain 85.00 Bid Document Storage Fees P1-37 & J-39 57357 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 272.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 57358 Irvine Pipe & Supply 339.31 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57359 Irvine Ranch Water District 8.05 Water Use 57360 Irvine Technology Corporation 3,360.00 Temporary Employment Services 57361 J.G. Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,634.00 Specialty Gases 57362 Joe Rhodes Maintenance Services, Inc. 147.11 Maint. Agreement -OCSD Fuel Management System 57363 Johnstone Supply 2,103.48 Electrical Equipment & Supplies 57364 Kforce, Inc. 12,759.12 Temporary Employment Services fin121onc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Clalms Paid Report -111503.xls Page3 of8 1213/2003 Claims Paid From 11/01/03 to 11/15/03 Warrant No. _V_e_n_do_r ___________ _ fint21onc 57365 Local Agency Formation Commission 57366 Long Beach Line-X 57367 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 57368 M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. 57369 David R. Mahuvakar 57370 McCrometer, Inc. 57371 McMahan Business Interiors 57372 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 57373 Mc Welco Products 57374 Media Resurfacing Systems, Inc. 57375 Medlin Controls Co. 57376 Mid-West Associates 57377 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 57378 Mission Uniform Service 57379 Motion Industries, Inc. 57380 MotorTech USA, Inc. 57381 MAG-TROL, Inc. 57382 National Filter Media Corporation 57383 National Safety Council 57384 Neal Supply Co. 57385 Nextel Communications 57386 Ninyo & Moore Corporate Accounting 57387 NACE International 57388 NAFA, Inc. 57389 NAS Associates, Inc. 57390 Office Depot Business Services Div. 57391 Ondeo Degremont, Inc. 57392 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 57393 The Orange County Register 57394 Orange County Vector Control District 57395 Orange Courier 57396 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 57397 Osterbauer Compressor 57398 Oxygen Service Company 57399 OCB Reprographics 57400 Pacific Bell Internet Services 57401 Pacific Mechanical Supply 57 402 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 57 403 Parker Hannifin Corporation 57 404 Parker Supply Company 57405 Parkhouse Tire Co., Inc. 57 406 Patriot Video Productions 57 407 Permaseal 57 408 Ponton Industries, Inc. 57 409 Power Design 57 410 Praxair Distribution, Inc. 57 411 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 57 412 Process Equipment Company G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Clalms Paid Report -111503.xls Amount 2,300.00 646.50 79.37 80.00 300.00 715.30 3,440.12 478.42 1,657.19 3,000.00 1,226.40 714.25 5,687.50 4,807.61 206.86 1,350.50 321.66 3,208.93 1,175.93 800.48 4,273.32 3,093.38 390.00 415.00 1,680.00 2,324.31 5,224.34 3,267.95 267.48 579.30 189.00 235.00 7,300.26 2,551.29 15,683.97 328.86 382.25 691.38 404.94 2,521.79 712.96 51.72 362.04 1,298.49 4,896.86 14.65 16,319.89 2,901.66 Description Annexation Fees Repair & Maintenance Services -Utility Trailer 903 Meeting Expense Professional Services -Pacific Coast Highway Force Mains Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Instrument Parts & Supplies Office Furniture & Fixtures Mechanical, Electrical & Lab Parts, Supplies & Tools (2) Tool Boxes Mechanical Repairs & Maintenance Mechanical Parts & Supplies Pump Supplies Mechanical Repairs & Maintenance Uniform Rentals Pump Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Electrical Supplies Meters On-Site Safety Training -Defensive Driving Plumbing Supplies Wireless Services Professional Services -Materials Testing, Inspection & Geotechnical Engrg. Membership Membership Lab Services Office Supplies Motor Electrical Parts & Supplies Notices & Ads Pest Control Courier Services Plumbing Parts & Supplies Compressor Parts & Supplies Specialty Gases Printing Service -MO 1 /26/00 Internet Service Plumbing Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Electrical Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies TI res Video Lube Oil Lab Parts & Supplies Electrical Supplies Demurrage Office Furniture Pump & Pump Supplies Page 4of8 EXHIBIT A 12/3/200J Claims Paid From 11/01/03to11/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor fin/210/lc ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 57413 Profit Techniques, Inc. 57 414 Pump Engineering 57415 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 57416 PCG Industries 57417 PCS Express, Inc. 57418 Ramco Specialty Products 57 419 Ricoh Business System 57 420 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 57421 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 57 422 RPM Electric Motors 57423 Sancen Engineering, Inc. 57424 Scicon Technologies Corp. 57425 Scottel Voice & Data, Inc. 57 426 Voided Check 57 427 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 57 428 Smardan Supply Company 57 429 Smith Pipe & Supply 57 430 Smith-Emery Company 57431 Snap-On Tools, Inc. 57 432 Soft-train, Inc. 57 433 South Coast Systems, Inc. 57 434 Southern California Water 57 435 Southern Mgr Grp, Inc. c/o O'Connor Sale 57436 Sparling Instruments, Inc. 57 437 Summit Steel 57 438 Sunset Ford 57 439 Sunset Industrial Parts 57 440 Seegott, Inc. 57441 SBC 57 442 SCP Science 57443 SPEC Services, Inc. 57 444 SPX Valves & Controls 57445 Tesco Controls, Inc. 57446 The Walking Man, Inc. 57447 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 57 448 Thompson Publishing Group 57449 Tony's Lock & Safe Service & Sales 57450 Trenchless Technology 57451 Trinity Consultants, Inc. 57452 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 57453 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. 57454 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 57 455 Two Wheels One Planet 57456 TEKsystems 57 457 U S Bank 57458 U-Line 57459 Ultra Scientific 57 460 United Parcel Service G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -111503.xls Amount 1,000.00 2,902.39 8,512.26 500.00 114.62 146.58 831.07 179.00 14.38 1,131.38 11,858.00 439.92 2,284.80 252.57 107.75 1,240.75 3,356.50 411.46 315.01 1,858.00 67.97 3,750.00 1,896.40 1,046.65 26.94 625.29 25.00 17.80 234.00 16,650.00 5,830.01 1,508.50 1,825.00 1,646.13 339.00 429.25 250.00 725.00 9,771.91 83.14 824.00 1,336.05 19,281.00 3,960.50 503.17 815.15 940.06 Description Professional Services -0 & M Management Coaching Pump & Mechanical Seal Hydraulic Pumps Repair & Maintenance Service Courier Service Oil & Grease Color Copier Lease Human Resources Training Registration Plumbing Parts & Supplies Sump Pump Construction -Installation of Cured-In-Place Pipe Liner for 8" Sewer in Tustin Mechanical Parts & Supplies Telephone System Maintenance Hardware Supplies Instrument Supplies Plumbing Parts & Supplies Soils, Concrete & Other Materials Testing Tools Human Resources Training Registration Professional Services -Installation of 200 Watt Power Supply for AGF Pilot Test Facility Water Use Mechanical Parts & Supplies Instrument Supplies Metal Auto Parts & Service Mechanical Supplies Freight Telephone Services Lab Supplies Professional Services P1-89 Valves & Mechanical Supplies Reactive Air System Public Outreach Program -Door Hangers for Warner Avenue Lane Closure Mechanical Parts & Supplies Publication Locks & Keys Project Management Office Training Registration Software Maintenance Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 Truck & Auto Parts Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater Bicycles & Bicycle Parts & Supplies Temporary Employment Services Annual Administration Fee for Series 2000 Certificates of Participation 9/1/03 -8/31/04 Miscellaneous Packing/Shipping Materials Lab Parts & Supplies Parcel Services Page 5of 8 EXHIBIT A 12/3/2003 Claims Paid From 11/01/03to11/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor 57461 United Rentals, Inc. 57462 Univar USA 57463 Van Air Systems, Inc. 57464 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 57465 Varian, Inc. 57466 Varian, Inc. 57467 Verizon California 57468 Voided Check 57469 Vossler & Company 57470 VWR Scientific Products 57471 Waste Markets 57472 Water Systems Cleaning Co. 57473 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 57474 Simon L. Watson 57475 Waxie Sanitary Supply 57476 West Coast Rotor 57477 Western \Mlolesale 57478 Westmark Paint Co. 57479 Willamette Industries, Inc. 57480 WEF 57481 WEF Publications 57482 Xerox Corporation 57483 3E Company 57484 Blake Anderson 57485 Jennifer M. Cabral 57486 Leandre P. Catacutan 57487 James R. Harris 57488 Deirdre E. Hunter 57489 Tony S. Lee 57490 Douglas M. Stewart 57491 Karen A. Turnbaugh 57492 Paula A. Zeller 57493 Knott's Berry Farm 57494 Watson, Simon 57495 Orange County Sanitation District 57496 Orange County Sanitation District 57497 Orange County Water District 57498 Pacific Investment Management Co. 57499 Airgas Safety, Inc. 57500 Allied Packing & Rubber, Inc. 57501 Arnold D. Purisch, Ph.D., Inc. 57502 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 57503 AT&T Wireless-TITAN 57504 Cell2Cell 57505 Court Order 57506 Compressor Components Of California 57507 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 57508 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. fin/21onc G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -111503.xls Amount 366.33 1,055.95 473.77 12,322.00 1,226.76 2,868.70 828.48 3,112.06 4,224.69 12,664.71 4,195.00 8,914.15 160.01 573.58 3,011.61 219.43 246.60 327.09 1,180.00 66.70 6,085.96 10,591.44 370.00 344.32 479.48 253.35 150.83 190.00 553.58 119.55 227.72 5,474.00 1,750.44 52,114.27 596,551.09 2,252,449.04 148,977.00 12.29 1,963.14 1, 120.00 21.78 33.26 170.61 150.00 3,354.00 229.81 1,797.31 Description Aerial Boom Lift Rental Chemicals Instrument Parts & Supplies Temporary Employment Service Lab Parts & Supplies Lab Parts & Supplies Telephone Services Mechanical Parts & Supplies Lab Parts & Supplies Maint. Agreement -Grit Screenings Removal & Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal Professional Services -Scrubber #10 Maintenance Engineering Service J-67 Meetinglf raining Expense Reimbursement Janitorial Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Tools & Mechanical Supplies Painting Supplies Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Membership -Water Environment Federation Publication Fax & Copier Leases Online 3E Website Service & Maintenance Agreement Meetinglfraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement Employee Deposit Transfer Employee Computer Loan Program Worker's Comp. Reimb. Payroll EFT Reimbursement GWRS Joint Project J-36 Investment Management Service Res. 95-97 Safety Supplies Plumbing Parts & Supplies Professional Employee Counseling Services Telephone Service Cell Phones & Accessories Cell Phones & Accessories Wage Garnishment Coil Cleaning & Testing & Compressor Parts Electrical Supplies Plumbing Supplies Pages of 8 EXHIBIT A 12/3120043 Warrant No. Vendor fin121onc ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 57509 Court Trustee 57510 Dharma Consulting 57511 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 57512 Electra-Bond, Inc. 57513 Element K Journals 57514 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 57515 Court Order 57516 Five Star Metals, Inc. 57517 Franchise Tax Board 57518 Industrial Metal Supply 57519 Internal Revenue Service 57520 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 57521 IECOC 57522 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 57523 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 57524 Moreland & Associates 57525 National Bond & Trust 57526 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 57527 OCEA 57528 Court Order 57529 Parker Hannifin Corporation 57530 Court Order 57531 Peace Officers Council of CA 57532 PenValve 57533 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 57534 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 57535 Court Order 57536 So. Cal. Gas Company 57537 Tule Ranch Farms 57538 The Unisource Corporation 57539 United Way 57540 Verizon California 57541 WEF 57542 WEFTEC 57543 Douglas I. Cook 57544 Robert P. Ghirelli 57545 Victoria L. Henn 57546 Mark H. Kawamoto 57547 Jin H. Kim 57548 Tracey L. Murphy 57549 Robert Ooten 57550 John W. Swindler 57551 City of Fountain Valley 57552 Eilenberger, Traci 57553 Kienow Associates, Inc. 57554 Orange County Sanitation District Total Accounts Payable -Warrants Claims Paid From 11/01/03 to 11/15/03 Amount 69.12 8,000.00 970.00 7,881.91 99.00 7,943.20 445.00 652.40 100.00 261.91 450.00 3,732.78 22.00 512.00 877.83 4,799.38 2,072.37 470.24 580.11 40.00 152.12 296.00 1,593.00 117.07 136.69 333.57 721.50 1,127.80 7,763.08 276.38 305.00 28.52 1,234.00 1,390.00 351.95 1,307.42 100.00 127.80 103.94 130.00 112.08 239.20 540.89 750.00 10,271.73 2,877.05 $ 7,841,360.63 Description Wage Garnishment Facilitator Services for EMT/Manager Workshop Medical Screening Repairs & Maintenance Services -Belt Press Rollers Subscription Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care Wage Garnishment Mechanical Parts & Supplies Wage Garnishment Metal Wage Garnishment Dues Deduction Safety & Health Meeting Registration Professional Services -Human Resources Policies & Procedures Lab Parts & Supplies, Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions Mechanical Parts & Supplies Dues Deduction Wage Garnishment Instrument Parts & Supplies Wage Garnishment Dues Deduction Plumbing Parts & Supplies Paint Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Wage Garnishment Natural Gas Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 Office Supplies Employee Contributions Telephone Services Membership -Water Environment Federation Engineering & Construction Meeting Registration Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement Plan Check Fee -J-89 Liability Claim Settlement Litigation Services -1-2-4 Petty Cash Reimb. G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -111503.xls Page 7of8 EXHIBIT A 12/312003 ~· Warrant No. _;;V..;;;e.;.;.nd.;;;;.o;;;..;r ___________ _ Payroll Disbursements 31483-31600 Employee Paychecks 31601 -31603 Employee Paychecks 31604 -31604 Employee Paycheck 91517 -92031 Direct Deposit Statements Total Payroll Disbursements Wire Transfer Payments fin/210/lc JP Morgan Chase Bank JP Morgan Chase Bank Chase Manhattan Bank Total Wire Transfer Payments Total Claims Paid 11/01103 -11115/03 Claims Paid From 11/01/03 to 11/15/03 Amount $ 169,082.25 988.77 4,237.21 884,353.45 $ 1,058,661.68 $ 126,684.93 34,681.25 73,766.34 $ 235,132.52 $ 9, 135, 154.83 Description Biweekly Payroll 11 /12/03 Payroll Adjustment & Reissue Stale-Dated Checks Termination Paycheck Biweekly Payroll 11/12/03 Societe Generale October Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation October Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Commitment Fee on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation (811-10/31/03) G:\excel.ctta\fln\220\APSHARE\Claims Pald Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report -111503.xls Page8 of8 EXHIBIT p. 12/312003 Warrant No. Vendor Accounts Payable -Warrants 57555 Air Products & Chemicals 57556 American Express 57557 Basic Chemical Solutions, L.L.C. 57558 Black & Veatch Corporation 57559 Blue Cross of California 57560 Brown & Caldwell 57561 Bush & Associates, Inc. 57562 California Soil Products 57563 Carollo Engineers 57564 City of Fountain Valley 57565 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 57566 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 57567 Hill Brothers 57568 Industrial Fabrics Corp. 57569 Voided Check 57570 IPMC c/o Parsons 57571 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 57572 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 57573 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 57574 Kforce, Inc. 57575 MOS Consulting 57576 North American Digester Cleaning Svcs. 57577 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 57578 Realtime Systems Corporation 57579 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 57580 Voided Check 57581 Systime Computer Corp 57582 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 57583 U.S. Peroxide 57584 Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart 57585 J F Shea Construction, Inc. 57586 Margate Construction, Inc. 57587 S. S. Mechanical Corp. 57588 Southern Contracting Company 57589 Abrasive Engineering Tool & Equipment 57590 Absolute Standards, Inc. 57591 Advance Business Graphics 57592 Airco Filter Service 57593 Airgas -West 57594 Airgas Safety, Inc. 57595 Alfa-Laval, Inc. 57596 Allied Packing & Rubber, Inc. 57597 American Airlines 57598 American Industrial Hygiene Association 57599 American Red Cross 57600 Arnot Control Corporation 57601 Appleone Employment Service G:\wp.dta\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Claims Paid Report -113003.xls fin1210nc Claims Paid From 11116103 to 11 /30103 Amount $ 26,294.06 28,325.95 50,603.20 40,422.19 312,884.78 65,731.85 28,258.00 104,745.68 664,985.20 25,970.14 114,437.00 27,037.36 41,474.49 34,570.00 820,788.00 36,300.00 51,920.14 100,290.59 26,795.63 35,936.16 118,140.00 211,092.25 49,976.00 38,034.90 25,595.00 171,490.83 253,150.90 95,183.73 953,095.43 2,242,268.00 57,313.69 28,260.00 112.08 685.00 318.95 125.68 6.82 3,487.49 2,583.55 191.97 6,072.50 160.00 8.00 866.08 5,613.52 Description O & M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 Purchasing Card Program, Misc. Supplies & Services Caustic Soda, Sodium Bilsulfite & Sodium Hydroxide Engineering Services J-77, P2-85 & SP-73 Medical Insurance Premium Professional Services 1-98, 2-41 & CMOMMIDR Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 Professional Services P2-66 & SP-90 Water Use Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98 Long-Term & Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium Chemicals -Odor & Corrosion Control -Newport Trunkline Durotex Belts -Various Sizes Professional Services -Program Project Management, Materials/Supplies & Temp. Staff Construction -Santa Ana River Access Road & Manhole Rehabilitation Project Medical Insurance Premium Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 Temporary Employment Services Prof. Services -Surveying Various Capital Projects Maint. & Repair Services -Cleaning of (4) Digesters at Pits. 1 & 2 Sodium Hypochlorite Software Maint. Agreement Ocean Monitoring P-185 & P-179 Professional Services -JD Edwards OWXe System Support Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 Prof. Serv. -Collection Sys. Odor & Corrosion Study & Hydrogen Peroxide & Ferrous Chloride Legal Services MO 7-26-95 Construction P2-85, J-35-2 & J-87 Construction P1-37 Construction J-40-6 Construction J-33-1 A Hardware Lab Parts & Supplies Printing Filters Demurrage Safety Supplies Repairs & Maintenance Services -Plant 2 Centrifuge Controls Packing Materials Travel Services Membership CPR Training & Miscellaneous Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Temporary Employment Services Page 1of8 EXHIBITS 121812003 Warrant No. ...;;V...;;e..;..;n..;.;.do..;.;.r ____________ _ 57602 Aqua-Metric Sales 57603 Arizona Instrument 57604 AT&T Universal Biller 57605 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 57606 AT&T Wireless -TITAN 57607 AVVSI 57608 BakerTanks 57609 BioMerieux Vitek, Inc. 57610 Borthwick, Guy, Bettenhausen 57611 Brenton Safety, Inc. 57612 BC Wire Rope & Rigging 57613 California Relocation Services, Inc. 57614 Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. 57615 Cardlock Fuels 57616 City of Fountain Valley 57617 Clemson University 57618 Coastal Training Technologies 57619 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 57620 Communications Supply Corp. 57621 Con-Way Western Express 57622 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 57623 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 57624 Corporate Express 57625 Cost Containment Solutions 57626 Council on Education in Management 57627 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 57628 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 57629 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 57630 County Wlolesale Electric Co. 57631 Crane Veyor Corp. 57632 Culligan of Orange County 57633 CR&R, Inc. 57634 CWEA Membership 57635 Dawson Company 57636 Del Mar Analytical 57637 Diamond H Recognition 57638 Dickson's, Inc. 57639 Dionex Corporation 57640 Document Control Solutions, Inc. 57641 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 57642 DGA Consultants, Inc. 57643 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 57644 Ecology Control Industries 57645 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 57646 Enchanter, Inc. 57647 Environmental Science Associates 57648 Excel Door & Gate Company, Inc. 57649 FedEx Corporation G:\wp.dta\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\0EC\Clalms Paid Report -113003.xls rrn121onc Claims Paid From 11116/03 to 11130103 Amount 751.60 1,400.75 3,375.90 119.79 26.40 236.00 1, 118.81 1,077.82 467.33 277.97 526.01 1,571.25 6,250.00 922.82 890.00 7,990.00 532.49 223.34 259.73 1,265.04 1,352.92 621.42 10,166.40 3,276.10 1,196.00 87.50 330.00 87.50 98.55 14,598.00 37.50 2,520.00 194.00 1,090.40 36.00 280.59 872.99 278.96 605.20 508.17 20,282.75 5,729.85 3,492.34 2,855.00 6,300.00 16,574.28 880.95 131.40 Description Fire Hydrant Meter Instrument Repairs Telephone Service Telephone Service Cellular Phones & Accessories Department of Transportation Training Program Tank Rentals Lab Parts & Supplies Professional Services P2-84 Safety Supplies Certification of (7) Confined Space Emergency Retrieval Devices Moving/Relocation Services Prof. Services -Workers' Compensation Claims Fueling District Vehicles at Local Gas Stations Fire Department Permit -Hazardous Materials Mechanical Maintenance & Power Production Training Registration Training Video Lab Parts & Supplies Computer Hardware Freight Electrical Parts & Supplies Plumbing Supplies Office Supplies Worker's Comp. Services Safety & Health Meeting Registration Encroachment Permit Encroachment Permit Encroachment Permit Electrical Parts & Supplies Quarterly Crane Inspections, Annual Certifications & Quad Testing Maint. Agreement -Cen Gen Water Softener System Container Rentals Membership -Calif. Water Environment Assoc. Pump Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater Employee Service Awards Electrical Supplies Lab Parts & Supplies Office Supplies Paint Supplies Professional Services -CCTV Data Evaluation Support Electrical Parts & Supplies Hazardous Waste Disposal Medical Screening Ocean Monitoring & Outfall Inspection & Maintenance Professional Services J-40-5 Door Maintenance & Repairs Air Freight Page2of8 EXHIBITS 12/8/2000 Warrant No. Vendor ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 57650 Filarsky & Watt, L.l.P. 57651 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 57652 Flomax Products, Inc. 57653 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 57654 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 57655 Franklin Covey 57656 Fry's Electronics 57657 G. T. Hall Company 57658 General Electric Supply Company 57659 General Petroleum 57660 Grainger, Inc. 57661 Graybar Electric Company 57662 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 57663 Herman Miller V\brkplace Resource 57664 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 57665 The Holman Group 57666 Home Depot 57667 Hopkins Technical Products 57668 Horizon Technology 57669 Hub Auto Supply 57670 Hydrotex 57671 ldexx 57672 Industrial Distribution Group 57673 Industrial Metal Supply 57674 Information Resources 57675 Insight Investments 57676 Intergraph Corporation 57677 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 57678 Invensys Systems, Inc. 57679 Ionics Instrument Business Group 57680 Irvine Technology Corporation 57681 IDM Controls, Inc. 57682 J & L Industrial Supply 57683 Johnstone Supply 57684 Kelly Paper 57685 KW Communications 57686 Lee & Ro, Inc. 57687 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 57688 Lytle Screen Printing 57689 LINJER 57690 Maverick Inspection, Ltd. 57691 McMahan Business Interiors 57692 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 57693 Measurement Control Systems, Inc. 57694 Measurement Variables, Inc. 57695 Mee Analytical System 57696 Medlin Controls Co. 57697 Michael Asner Consulting G:\wp.dta\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Claims Paid Report-113003.xls fin/21onc Claims Paid From 11/16/03to11/30/03 Amount 2,042.50 10,153.58 640.04 628.07 579.90 555.80 552.05 1,792.43 434.24 12,949.19 1,213.61 3,187.29 3,292.44 5,678.06 864.98 903.96 1,217.44 4,415.64 900.36 393.60 4,745.31 5,430.60 607.83 565.60 750.00 23,932.27 5,909.01 163.90 677.69 82.73 7,618.00 258.63 582.84 905.09 615.38 4,325.50 2,602.70 100.52 835.06 9,969.87 2,094.68 12,594.27 470.18 10,674.29 802.74 8,725.00 1,366.28 750.00 Description Prof. Serv. -SPMT & Other Bargaining Group Labor Negotiations & Other Services Lab Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Paint Supplies Truck Wash Tickets Office Supplies Computer Supplies Electrical Parts & Supplies Electrical Parts & Supplies Unleaded Gasoline Electrical Parts & Supplies Computer Hardware/Software Lab Parts & Supplies Office Furniture Mechanical Parts & Supplies Employee Assistance Program Misc. Repair & Maintenance Materials Pump Parts & Supplies Lab Parts & Supplies Vehicle Parts & Supplies Lube Oil Lab Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Metal Human Resources Services -Background Checks Software Software Maint. Agreement Batteries for Vehicles & Carts Instrument Supplies Lab Supplies Temporary Employment Service Instrument Supplies Tools Electrical Supplies Paper Prof. Serv. -Bushard Trunkline Repl. & Warner Relief Sewer Outreach Projects Professional Services 5-22-R1 Meeting Expense Printing Service Professional Service -DART MO 9-22-99 Fixed Viewing Crystals Miscellaneous Office Supplies & Furniture Mechanical Parts, Supplies & Maintenance Material Instrument Parts & Supplies Electrical Supplies Toxicity Analysis Instrument Supplies Prof. Serv. -RFP Handbook & Internal Policies & Procedures for Purchasing Div. Page 3of8 EXHIBITS 121812003 Warrant No. Vendor ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 57698 Mile Square Golf Course 57699 Mission Abrasive & Janitorial Supplies 57700 Mission Uniform Service 57701 MARMAC Field Services, Inc. 57702 MJK Construction 57703 National Plant Services, Inc. 57704 Neal Supply Co. 57705 New Hermes, Inc. 57706 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 57707 Ninyo & Moore Corporate Accounting 57708 Office Depot Business Services Div. 57709 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 57710 Orange Courier 57711 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 57712 Oxygen Service Company 57713 OCB Reprographics 57714 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 57715 Pacific Bell/WorldCom 57716 Pacific Bell Internet Services 57717 Pacific Mechanical Supply 57718 Pacific Publishers 57719 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 57720 Parts Unlimited 57721 PenValve 57722 Perkin Elmer Corporation 57723 Polydyne, Inc. 57724 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 57725 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 57726 Project Management Institute 57727 Propulsion Controls Engineering 57728 Protech Petroleum Services, Inc. 57729 PVF Sales, Inc. 57730 Quinn Shepherd Machinery Co. 57731 Rainbow Disposal Co. 57732 Raneylndustries 57733 Reliastar 57734 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 57735 RBF Consulting 57736 RPM Electric Motors 57737 Sancen Engineering, Inc. 57738 Schwing America, Inc. 57739 Scicon Technologies Corp. 57740 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 57741 Seaventures 57742 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 57743 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 57744 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 577 45 Smardan Supply Company G:\wp.dta\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Claims Paid Report -113003.xls fin121onc Claims Paid From 11/16/03to11/30/03 Amount 700.00 90.83 5,111.60 11,618.00 3,180.90 6,390.00 241.95 103.13 1,608.35 6,943.52 1,439.18 1,317.48 171.45 2,219.98 838.06 8,940.69 998.59 16.22 324.00 210.07 89.72 164.03 815.78 112.59 1,121.75 13,560.29 463.45 2,923.11 154.00 794.59 13,615.14 248.51 131.24 2,551.92 870.00 9,559.85 1,992.94 6,004.54 1,772.45 21,202.50 51.12 3,978.77 649.00 5,550.00 3,138.38 124.94 355.47 52.88 Description Meeting Expense -Community Outreach Workshop Janitorial Supplies Uniform Rentals Professional Services P1-92 Professional Services -Fuel Tank Vacuum Truck Services Plumbing Supplies Repairs & Maintenance Materials Industrial Turbine Oil & Gear Oil Compound Professional Services -Materials Testing, Inspection & Geotechnical Engrg. Office Supplies Electrical Parts, Supplies & Tools Courier Services Lab & Plumbing Supplies Specialty Gases Printing Service -MO 1 /26/00 Filters Telephone Service Internet Service Plumbing Supplies Publication Tires Vehicle Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Lab Parts & Supplies Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium Office Furniture Membership Repairs & Maintenance Services Annual Underground Storage Tank Maintenance Inspection Pipe Oil Filters Trash Removal Repairs & Maintenance Services Employee Basic Life Insurance Premium Mechanical Parts & Supplies Engineering Services 2-24-1 Pump, Motor and Misc. Supplies Construction -Manhole Rehabilitation Program Mechanical Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Lab Equipment Maintenance & Calibration Service Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support Professional Services -Ocean Outfall Instrumentation Mechanical Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Page4 of8 EXHIBITS 12/812003 Warrant No. Vendor ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 577 46 So. Cal. Gas Company 577 4 7 Southern California Edison 57748 Standard Supply & Equipment Co., Inc. 57749 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 57750 Summit Steel 57751 Suncor Stainless, Inc. 57752 Sunset Ford 57753 Sunset Industrial Parts 57754 Super Power Products 57755 Symcas-TSG 57756 SBC 57757 SPX Valves & Control 57758 Taylor-Dunn 57759 Teletrac, Inc. 57760 Terminix International 57761 Tetra Tech, Inc. 57762 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 57763 Tony's Lock & Safe Service & Sales 57764 Southern California Trane Service 57765 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 57766 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. 57767 TCH Associates, Inc. 57768 US Filter Corporation 57769 U-Line 57770 Ultra Scientific 57771 The Unisource Corporation 57772 United Parcel Service 57773 Defense Finance and Accounting 5777 4 Universal Flooring Systems, Inc. 57775 Universal Specialties, Inc. 57776 Urban Alternatives 57777 US Equipment Co., Inc. 57778 US Filter Westates Carbon 57779 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 57780 Varian, Inc. 57781 Verizon California 57782 Verne's Plumbing 57783 Vision Service Plan 57784 Vortex, Inc. 57785 VWR Scientific Products 57786 The Wackenhut Corporation 57787 Waco Filter 57788 Waste Markets 57789 Water Systems Cleaning Co. 57790 Waxie Sanitary Supply 57791 WEF 57792 WEFTEC 57793 Xerox Corporation G:\wp.dta\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Claims Paid Report· 113003.xls fin121onc Claims Paid From 11/16/03to11/30/03 Amount 23,719.32 2, 153.51 1,607.72 442.50 938.58 61.54 14.04 2,282.20 646.50 1,381.60 17.47 1, 155.23 114.04 245.00 350.00 1,041.52 20,196.91 186.62 9,909.00 600.00 170.30 595.07 1,159.00 94.93 49.60 134.25 29.32 9,280.16 3,107.00 391.28 1,946.00 256.28 2,446.91 10,854.00 82.20 5,764.59 1,435.00 9,073.92 769.40 6, 198.71 11,602.02 298.65 15,696.83 12,985.00 358.92 170.00 695.00 5,808.83 Description Natural Gas Power Mechanical Parts & Supplies Carpet Cleaning Services Metal Lab Supplies Automotive Parts & Supplies Mechanical Parts & Supplies Janitorial Supplies SCADA System VAX Service Agreement Telephone Service Mechanical Parts & Supplies Electric Cart Parts Monthly Air-Time Service Fee & Software/Hardware Maint. For Vehicle Tracking Sys. Pest Control Professional Services 7-37 Mechanical Parts & Supplies & Equipment Locks & Keys Elec. Equip. Service Contract & Install (2) Sets of Backdraft Dampers in AIC Units Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 Automotive Supplies Lab Supplies Service Agreement -Lab Purification System Burlap Bags Lab Supplies Office Supplies Parcel Services Professional Services J-85 -Naval Post Graduate School Carpeting -Mechanical Maintenance Offices, Lunch Room & Locker Rooms Mechanical & Plumbing Parts & Supplies Professional Services -1-10 Mechanical Parts & Supplies Carbon Filters Temporary Employment Service Lab Parts & Supplies Telephone Services Service Contract -Repair Backftow Devices Vision Service Premium Door Repairs Lab Parts & Supplies Security Guards Filters Maint. Agreement -Grit & Screenings Removal & Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal Maint. Serv. -Remove & Replace Scrubber Media in Scrubber No. 9 at Pit. 1 Janitorial Supplies Membership -Water Environment Federation Project Management Office Training Registration Fax & Copier Leases Page 5 of 8 , .\ EXHIBITS 1218/2003 Warrant No. Vendor ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 57794 Yamato Scientific America, Inc. 57795 California Bank & Trust 57796 James E. Colston 57797 Ricardo A Gallegos 57798 Randy E. Harris 57799 Jesse J. Lechner 57800 Selwyn D. Mansell 57801 Theodore M. Mauter 57802 Umesh N. Murthy 57803 Ddaze Phuong 57804 Kenneth L. Ramey 57805 SARBS-CWEA 57806 Paula A. Zeller 57807 Employee Activity Committee 57808 Ernest Anast & Chris Daly 57809 PRSA -Orange County Chapter 57810 SARBS 57811 Tomko, Mark 57812 lnnerline Engineering 57813 Orange County Sanitation District 57814 Regents of Univ. of California 57815 Southern California Edison 57816 Synagro Technologies, Inc. 57817 Airgas Safety, Inc. 57818 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 57819 California Relocation Services, Inc. 57820 Court Order 57821 Court Trustee 57822 County Sanitation District No. 70 57823 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 57824 Electra-Bond, Inc. 57825 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 57826 Employment Development Dept. 57827 Court Order 57828 Franchise Tax Board 57829 Hewlett-Packard Express Services 57830 City of Huntington Beach 57831 Industrial Metal Supply 57832 Internal Revenue Service 57833 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng. AFL-CIO Local 501 57834 Irvine Ranch Water District 57835 J & B Auto Parts 57836 Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, L.L.P. 57837 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 57838 Mellon Trust 57839 Mid-West Associates 57840 National Bond & Trust 57841 National Technology Transfer, Inc. G:\wp.dta\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Claims Paid Report-113003.xls fin1210nc Claims Paid From 11/16/03 to 11/30/03 Amount 60.95 3,140.00 846.87 80.00 184.39 130.00 170.00 190.00 148.56 130.00 206.94 70.00 231.20 248.00 1,123.19 62.00 375.00 1,653.46 32,364.45 678,973.99 31,233.12 106,540.36 241,900.78 1,563.46 83.84 236.25 150.00 69.12 5,440.00 404.33 23,424.85 7,868.20 1, 110.16 445.00 100.00 419.00 24,197.68 239.59 450.00 3,691.78 39.74 497.92 5,005.00 171.35 23,582.30 795.27 2,072.37 4,997.50 Description Lab Parts & Supplies Construction J-33-1A, Retention Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingff raining Expense Reimbursement Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement Employee Recognition & Activities Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Communications Meeting Registration Plant 2 Operations Meeting Registration Employee Computer Loan Program CClV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers Payroll EFT Reimbursement Professional Services J-85 -Naval Post Graduate School Power Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 Safety Supplies Telephone Service Office Moving/Relocation Services Wage Garnishment Wage Garnishment Olfactometry Lab Expense Medical Screening Repairs & Maintenance Services Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care State Unemployment Tax Wage Garnishment Wage Garnishment Software Support Water Use Metal Wage Garnishment Dues Deduction Water Use Auto Parts & Supplies Professional Services -Legislative Advocacy Mechanical Parts & Supplies Investment Custodian Bank Pump Supplies U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions On-Site Training -Custom Hands-On Hydraulics Page6 of8 EXHIBIT,~ 1218/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 57842 Nu-way Laser Engraving 57843 OCDM Marketing 57844 OCEA 57845 Court Order 57846 Court Order 57847 Peace Officers Council of CA 57848 Popular Paver Rental 57849 Richard Chang Associates, Inc. 57850 Safetycare, Inc. 57851 Court Order 57852 Sparkletts 57853 SBC 57854 Thompson Publishing Group 57855 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 57856 United way 57857 Verizon California 57858 Voided Check 57859 WEF 57860 James L. Burrer 57861 Aplon, Ken Jr. 57862 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 57863 Airgas Safety, Inc. 57864 AT&T 57865 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 57866 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 57867 CMAA 57868 Dobbertin & Associates 57869 G.F.O.A. 57870 Hirsch & Company 57871 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 57872 City of Newport Beach 57873 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 57874 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 57875 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 57876 Christina M. Thomas 57877 U.S Postal Service 57878 Chloe D. Dao 57879 Chuck M. Forman 57880 Michelle R. Hetherington 57881 Tyler T. Hoang 57882 Michael J. Mengel 57883 Michael D. Moore 57884 Matthew P. Smith 57885 Robert J. Taylor 57886 Lisa L. Tomko 57887 Daniel R. Tremblay 57888 Yu-Li Tsai 57889 Braze, Edward G:\wp.dta\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Claims Paid Report-113003.xls fin121onc Claims Paid From 11116/03 to 11 /30/03 Amount 296.25 2,818.19 561.61 40.00 296.00 1,602.00 14,562.20 4,798.40 237.05 721.50 1,645.26 1,072.50 329.00 230.00 305.00 562.36 134.00 400.00 1,150.62 1,065.00 653.07 51.22 415.89 47.71 140.00 2,300.00 630.00 9.00 1,055.14 56.31 517.68 168.32 6.41 471.45 5,000.00 175.00 529.01 226.71 170.00 518.70 263.00 230.00 741.45 1,603.62 1,819.05 1,911.35 1,088.19 Description Steel Tags Processing Fee -warner Neighborhood Public Notice Mailing & Postage Dues Deduction Wage Garnishment wage Garnishment Dues Deduction Construction -Repair (3) Sink Holes in City of Tustin On-Site Training -Building A Dynamic Team & Meetings That Work Safety Video Wage Garnishment Drinking water/Cooler Rentals Telephone Service Publication Elevator Maintenance Employee Contributions Telephone Service Membership -water Environment Federation Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Employee Computer Loan Program Administration Fee -Supplemental Sewer Service Fee Adjustments & Cancellations Safety Supplies Telephone Service Electrical Supplies Plumbing Supplies Engineering & Construction Meeting Registration (Const Mgmt. Assoc. of America) Professional Services -CAD Design for Simulator Accounting Training Registration FOG Report Price Adjustment Refund Mechanical Parts, Supplies & Tools Water Use Plumbing Supplies Water Use Mechanical Parts Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Postage Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 7of8 EXHIBITS 1218/2003 Warrant No. Vendor 57890 Burks, Don 57891 Hurst, Michael 57892 Johnson, George 57893 Kaczmarek, Richard 57894 Margaretis, Steve 57895 Michele Russo Trust 57896 Ramos, Fernando 57897 Rischard, Theodore 57898 Rose Dailies Trust 57899 Springstead, Kathleen 57900 Stuart, David 57901 Torres, Carlos 57902 Tye, Michael 57903 Wendy's Consolidated Trust 57904 VVilliams, Paul Total Accounts Payable-Warrants Payroll Disbursements 31605 -31697 Employee Paychecks 31698-31883 Employee Paychecks 92032 -92537 Direct Deposit Statements Total Payroll Disbursements Wire Transfer Payments U.S. Bank Total Wire Transfer Payments Total Claims Paid 11/16/03 -11/30/03 G:\wp.dta\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Claims Paid Report -113003.xls t1n121onc Claims Paid From 11 /16/03 to 11 /30/03 Amount 903.95 903.95 1,247.76 1,247.76 815.18 1,318.23 433.62 251.42 1,247.76 1,318.23 88.77 1,247.76 618.76 1,318.23 1,247.76 $ 8,773,903.52 $ 156,508.35 $ 85,159.06 951,432.39 $ 1, 193,099.80 $ 132,916.60 $ 132,916.60 $ 10,099,919.92 Description Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Biweekly Payroll 11 /26/03 Retroactive Salary Adjustments Biweekly Payroll 11/26/03 November Interest Payment on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Page8of8 EXHIBIT I?-:;.... 1218/2003 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeti ng Date To Bd . of Di r. 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Nu mber Item Nu mber 9(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-36 -HOLTZ ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition requesting annexation of 1.00 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) on Randall Street in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-29, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-36 -Holtz Annexation). SUMMARY • OCSD received a request from Eric Holtz to annex 1.00 acres to OCSD. This parcel will be connected to an existing City of Orange sewer on Randall Street. • This parcel will be annexed to the City of Orange. The property has an existing three bedroom house . The property has an existing septic system that will be removed after annexation to the District and connect to the City of Orange sewer. • The City of Orange will collect the sewer inspection and sewer capacity fees for this property. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties. The Board of Directors approved this action and it became effective March 14, 1989. Under this Tax Exchange , OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead , collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of $5,876 includes the following: LAFCO Processing Fee OCSD Processing Fee State Board of Equalization Processing Fee CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee OCSD Annexation Acreage Fee (1.00 acres) TOTAL ANNEXATION FEE $ 1, 150 500 300 43 $ 3.883 $ 5 ,876 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A BUDGET IMPACT D This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) D This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. [gl Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption will be filed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ex hibit A Legal Description 2 . Ex hibit B Map RLC:sa G:\nt g lobal\Agenda Draft Reports\.Joint B oards\Holtz A n nexation -121703.doc Revised: 8120/01 Page2 \ EXHIBIT "A" OCSD-36 Holtz Annexation No. DA 03-23 to the Orange County Sanitation District That portion of land situated in the Unincorporated Territory of the County of Orange, State of 2 California, being a portion of lots 29 and Lot A (Randall Street) of Tract No. 944, as shown on a map 3 thereof filed in Book 29, Page 41, of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said 4 County, more particularly described as follows: 5 Beginning at an angle point in the existing boundary of the Orange County Sanitation District 6 (OCSD), as established by "Annexation No. 81" to the County Sanitation District No. 7 said angle point 7 being the southwest corner of said annexation and the southwesterly terminus of that certain course 8 shown as ••N79°1T36''E 445.8311 ', said angle point being also a point on the centerline of Randall Street, 9 60.00 feet wide, as shown on said annexation, from which a tie to said point bears North 07°17'13" West 10 638.80 feet from Orange County Horizontal Control Station GPS No. 3222, having a coordinate value 11 (U.S. Survey foot) of North 2241289.822 and East 6098212.630, based upon the California Coordinate 12 System(CCS 83), Zone VI, 1983 NAD ( 1991.35 epoch OCS OPS Adjustment) as said OPS No. 3222 is 13 shown as shown on Record of Survey 92-1028, filed in Book 149, Pages 10 through 20, inclusive, of 14 Records of Survey, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; 15 Thence, along said existing OCSD boundary and said centerline of Randall Street North 79°31' 17" 16 East, 133.59 feet to a point of intersection with the northerly prolongation of the easterly boundary line of 11 the land described in a Deed to Eric D. Holtz and Connie S. Holtz recorded February 19, 1987 as 18 Instrument No. 87-089663 of Official Records of said County, 19 Thence, leaving said existing OCSD boundary and said centerline, continuing along said northerly 20 prolongation, the easterly, southerly and westerly boundary lines of said Deed through the following 21 courses: South 08°28'43" East, 319.02 feet; 22 Thence, South 81°31' 17" West, 137 .66 feet; 23 Thence, North 08°28'43" West, 284.44 feet to the northwest comer of said land; 24 Thence, leaving the boundary of said land, continuing along the northerly prolongation of the last 25 mentioned course and westerly boundary line North 08°28'43" West. 30.01 feet to a point of intersection 26 27 Page 1of3 EXHIBIT "A" OCSD-36 Holtz Annexation No. DA 03-23 to the Orange County Sanitation District with said Randall Street, said point being distant South 82°58' 42" West, 4.15 feet from said southwest 2 comer of said "Annexation No. 81 "; 3 Thence, along the centerline of Randall Street North 82°58' 42" East, 4.15 feet to the point of 4 Beginning. 5 6 Unless otherwise noted, all distances are ground and are based upon the California Coordinate System 7 (CCS 83), Zone VI, 1983 NAD (1991.35 EPOCH OCS GPS Adjustment). To obtain grid distances, 8 multiply the ground distances by 0.99997043. 9 10 The above-described parcel of land contains 1.00 acres, more or less. 11 12 All as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference, made a part thereof. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Page 2of3 , ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 EXHIBIT "A" OCSD-36 Holtz Annexation No. DA 03-23 to the Orange County Sanitation District This document was prepared by me or under my direction and supervision. :J~O "';"\ ---p Dated this _-J_day of v\::<i:::r>1f3t:'"', 2003 ~~JX.&/e-. Michael K. Sullivan L.S. 6254 My license expires 6-30-06 This document does meet the approval of the Orange County Surveyor's Office John Canas, County Surveyor ..,;<o -.... 3-p Dated this~ day of Dt=L 1= r-11 i=-~ 2003 ,. -M~~Jk&~,ef' ~ Per: Michael K. Sullivan, Deputy County Surveyor L.S. 6254, My license expires 6-30-06 Page 3of3 60' 0' 30' 60' ------ GRAPHIC SCALE 1"•60' e,,I o_ NW. COR. JNST. No. 87-089663 O.R. UNINCORPORATED GPS No. 3222 N 2241289.822 E 6098212.630 PER RS 92-1028 RSB 149110-20 EXHIBIT "B" OCSD-36 HOLTZ ANNEXATION No. DA 03-23 TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INST. No. .i'.d •. M •. '!l.P / ~u ~ 87-089663 O. R. TERRITORY ----------: I ----------' ' ' ' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL DISTANCES ON THIS MAP ARE GROUND AND ARE BASED UPON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM CCCSB31. ZONE VI. 1983 NAO 11991.35 EPOCH OCS GPS ADJUSTMENT!. TO OBTAIN GRID DISTANCE. MULTIPLY GROUND DISTANCE BY 0.999970~3. A.P.N. 379-121-02 THIS PARCEL OF LANO CONTAINS 1.00 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT TH IS PROPOSAL WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT I ON;, /J L .. --t~f'k ... ~· -- MICHAEL K. SULLIVAN, L.S. 6254 MY LICENSE EXPIRES 6/30/06 COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT SHEET l OF l THIS PROPOSAL DOES MEET THE APROVAL OF THE ORANGE COUNTJ' SURVEYORS OFFIC~. r.A. DATED THIS~ DAY OFPEC'PIM~~~oo3. JOHN CANAS. COUNTY SURVETOR ~/; • ~~k.A~- BY: MICHAEL K. SULLIVAN. DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR L.S. 5z54, MY LICENSE EXPIRES 6/JO/Z006 LEGEND ANNEXATION BOUNDARY ~ ~ ~ \.U EXISTING ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10.c.S.D. I BOUNDARY. I I RECORD DATA PER ADJOINING ANNEXATION & INDICATES OCS HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION .. AS FI LED THE OFF I CE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY 11 SURVEYOR. d ;, BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT I tem Number Item Number 9(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin , Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith , Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-37-WORDEN ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition request i ng annexation of 0.36 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) on Vista Del Lago and Lemon Heights Drive in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-30 , authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-37 -Worden Annexation). SUMMARY • OCSD received a request from Tim Worden to annex 0.36 acres to OCSD. This parcel will be connected to an existing OCSD sewer on Lemon Heights Drive. • The property has an existing three bedroom house . The home has an existing septic system that will be removed after annexation to the District. • O CSD has collected the sewer inspection and sewer capacity fees for this property. PROJECTICONTRACTCOSTSUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties. The Board of Directors approved this action and it became effective March 14, 1989. Under this Tax Exchange , OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead , collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of $8, 196 includes the following: LAFCO Processing Fee OCSD Processing Fee State Board of Equalization Processing Fee OCSD sewer capacity fee existing (3) bedroom home OCSD sewer inspection fee CA Environmenta l Quality Act Filing Fee OCSD Annexation Acreage Fee TOT AL ANNEXATION FEE $ 1,150 500 300 1,820 500 43 $ 3,883 $ 8,196 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS NI A BUDGET IMPACT D This item has been budgeted . (Line item : ) D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. C8J Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NIA ALTERNATIVES NIA CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption will be filed . ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map RLC:sa :gc G:\ntglobal\Ag e nd a Dra ft Reports\Joint Board s\ W o rd en An nexatio n -12 1703 .doc Revised: 8/20/01 •• Page 2 ' EXHIBIT "A" OCSD-37 Worden Annexation No. DA 03-24 to the Orange County Sanitation District That portion of land situated in the Unincorporated Territory of the Cotmty of Orange, State of California, 2 being all of Lot 8 and a portion of Lot Y (Vista del Lago) of Tract No. 694, as shown on a map thereof 3 filed in Book 31, Pages 30 through 32, inclusive, ofMiscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County 4 Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: s Beginning at an angle point in the existing boundary of the Orange County Sanitation District 6 (OCSD), as established by "Annexation No. 143" to the County Sanitation District No. 7 said angle point 7 being the northwest comer of said annexation and the southwesterly terminus of that certain course sho s as "N56°40' lO"E 207.50"', said angle point being also a point on the centerline of Vista del Lago, 40.00 9 feet wide; from which a tie to said point bears North 45°18' 11" East 1550.54 feet to Orange County 10 Horizontal Control Station GPS No. 6544, having a coordinate value (U.S. Survey foot) of North 11 2224064.292 and East 6098477.186, based upon the California Coordinate System (CCS 83), Zone VI, 12 1983 NAD ( 1991.35 epoch OCS GPS Adjustment) as said GPS No. 6544 is shown on Tract 15563 filed 13 in Book 772, pages 33 through 40, inclusive, ofMiscellaneous Maps of Records of said County; 14 THENCE, leaving the centerline of Vista del Lago and continuing along said district boWldary 15 (OCSD) per said "Annexation No. 143" and "Annexation No. 78", the following two courses; 16 South 32°31' 18" East 149.01 feet; 17 THENCE South 47°57'42" West 101.40 feet to the southwesterly comer of Lot 8, Tract 694, also I 8 being a point on the northwesterly right of way of Lemon Heights Drive; t 9 THENCE leaving said existing OCSD boundary, North 32°31'18''W est 165. 78 feet along the 20 southwesterly line of said Lot 8 and it's prolongation to a point of intersection with the centerline of Vista 21 del Lago; 22 Thence, North 57°28'42" East, along the centerline of Vista del Lago, 100.00 feet to the Point of 23 Beginning. 24 25 26 27 Page 1 of2 EXHIBIT "A" OCSD-37 Worden Annexation No. DA 03-24 to the Orange County Sanitation District Unless otherwise noted, all distances are ground and are based upon the California Coordinate System 2 (CCS 83), Zone VI, 1983 NAD (1991.35 EPOCH OCS GPS Adjustment). To obtain grid distances, 3 multiply the ground distances by 0.99996967. 4 5 The above--Oescribed parcel of land contains 0.36 acres, more or less. 6 7 All as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference, made a part thereof. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 This document was prepared by me or under my direction and supervision. 3 RO _ -i3-R. Dated this _day of 'D\-~ r-M i:: 2003 ::H~~J-K~L__:___ Michael K. Sullivan L.S. 6254 My license expires 6-30-06 This document does meet the approval of the Orange County Surveyor's Office John Canas, County Surveyor Dated this ..3 RD day of 1/EC.l=.>r1 13>= R 2003 Uk~.,,~~~ Per: Michael K. ~livan, Deputy County Surveyor L.S. 6254, My license expires 6-30-06 Page2 of2 COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS PROPOSAL DOES MEET THE APROVAL OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYORS OFF ICE. -n DATED TH l S 3.££...._oA Y OF i>S.C.~"" t"3 t: '' 2003. JOHN CANAS, COUNTY SURVEYOR BY: MICHAEL K. SULLIVAN. DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR L.S. 6254. MY LICENSE EXPIRES 6/30/2006. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT TH IS PROPOSAL WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER,... ~y DIRECTION. ,,,.;/ : //'1..u4ra-:&~.?.e~ MICHAEL K. SULLIVAN. L.S. 6254 MY LICENSE EXPIRES 6/30/2006 EXHIBIT "B" OCSD-37 WORDEN ANNEXATION No.DA 03-24 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT , ... ~ .. \ ... ··' ', ~ .. ~~\?"' \ .. \ ' ', '\ \ \ ' \ \ ' \ \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \ . .. ... l• ~ ro.' ... ...... \) .... • I a,f .. · .. · \ .. \ NOTES: \ \ ' \ A.P.N. 502-354-03 ' \ \ \ THIS PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 0.36 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE 1 # a 50' SO' O' 25' 50' ------- UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL DISTANCES ON THIS MAP ARE GROUND AND ARE BASED UPON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM <CCSB31o ZONE Vlo 1983 NAO 11991.35 EPOCH OCS GPS AOJUSTMENTI. TO OBTAIN GRID OJ STANCE. MULTIPLY GROUND DISTANCE BY 0.99996967. ® ® I l LEGEND "ANNEXATION NO. 78 CTENT ATIVE TRACT NO. 9688>" TD COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ND. 7. "ANNEXATION NO. 143" TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ND. 7 RECORD PER ADJOINING ANNEXATION ANNEXATION BOUNDARY \ \\ \ .fXISTING ORANGE COUNTY SANIT ATIDN blSTRlCT <D.C.S.D.> BOUNDARY. _A INDICATES OCS HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION AS FILED IN TH£ OFFICE OF TH£ ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR. i BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation D1stnct FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg , Engineering Manager Meeting Date To Bel . of Dir. 12/17/03 Item Number Item Number 9(c) SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CHARLES RINEHART , JACK SELMAN , TIM METZGER, AND THE JENSEN FAMILY TRUST GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to enter into a reimbursement agreement with Charles Rinehart, Jack Selman , Tim Metzger, and the Jensen Family Trust for construction of a new 8-inch diameter sewer in Foothill Blvd . near La Cuesta Drive in Lemon Heights, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • In former Revenue Area No. 7 where the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is the local sewer agency, it has been common practice for developers to construct new local sewers to provide sewer service to their properties. Once the sewer is constructed and inspected by OCSD, the sewer is then conveyed to OCSD and becomes part of OCSD's collection system. The District has also made it a common practice to enter into reimbursement agreements whereby a developer can recover some of the costs of the construction of new sewers from adjoining property owners when the property is developed and they need to connect to a public sewer. • Four property owners, Charles Rinehart; Jack Selman ; Tim Metzger; and the Jensen Family Estate , are proposing to construct an 8-inch sewer to connect their parcels to OCSD's collection system. The proposed sewer would connect to an existing OCSD manhole on Foothill Blvd. and then process up 1,470 feet up Foothill Blvd. to La Cuesta Drive . There are also si x neighboring parcels that could connect to this new sewer provided that they annex to the District. • The proposed reimbursement agreement would contain the following provisions: The sewer would be constructed to OCSD standards and would be inspected by OCSD staff. OCSD would collect usual plan check and inspection fees . OCSD would collect all sewer capacity fees before house connection permits are issued . Upon completion , the new sewer line within public street right-of-way would then become the property of OCSD . C:\Doc uments and Se ttin gs\p ope\Local Settings\Temporary Intern et Fll es\OLK BF\ltem 9(c).Re lmburse ment Agreem ent.doc Re vised : 06/04/03 Page 1 OCSD would collect funds from each subsequent property owner connecting to the new sewer and would then pass the funds on to the developers (four property owners) of the new sewer to reimburse them for a proportional share of their cost to construct the sewer. The agreement would allow re imbursements to occur for new connections occurring within 10 years after the completion of construction. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The cost of the new sewer will be paid by the four property owners. The sewer will then become the property of OCSD. BUDGET IMPACT D This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds . D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The si x neighboring parcels will also build an off-site private sewer out side of the public right-of-way which will require formation of a homeowner's association to maintain the private sewer, and must be approved by the County of Orange plumbing d ivision before OCSD would give them connection permits and allow them to connect to the public sewer. This private sewer will not be owned or maintained by OCSD. ALTERNATIVES Do not proceed with a reimbursement agreement. In this case, it would be likely that the property owners would not construct the new sewer, and instead, would remain on individual septic systems . CEQA FINDINGS Notice of exemption will be filed . ATTACHMENTS None JDH:RLC:gc:sa G:\ntgl obal\Ag enda Draft Report s\Joint Boards\Reimburse ment Agreement Lem on Heights AR -12 17 0 3.doc C:\Documents and Settingslpope\Local Setlings\Temporary Internet Flles\OLKBF\Jtem 9(c).Reimburseme nt Agreement.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING \Nednesday,November19,2003 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, November 19, 2003 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMllTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Shirley McCracken, Chair Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Jim Ferryman, Chairman, OMTS Committee Brian Donahue, Chairman, PDC Committee Jim Silva, County Supervisor Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair Directors Absent: Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don Hughes Ryal Wheeler Gerhardt Van Orie STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager Mike Moore, ECM Manager Jim Colston, Legal and Regulatory Affairs Liaison Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Mr. Gerhardt Van Orie asked for a copy of the correspondence pertaining to his proposal. (4) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the October 22, 2003 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 November 19, 2003 ask for a federal hearing on the problems. The County of Orange, Orange County Water District and SAWPA also are stakeholders in the process as they have projects that impact the river watershed. It was suggested that the lobb~sts for the impacted agencies YAJrk together on this issue in an effort to keep the project moving. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-E) A. Joint Water Campus and Related Signage Concepts The District has conceptually agreed to allowing the chemical trucks for GWRS to come through our Ellis Avenue gate to reduce traffic on Ellis and Ward, to reduce the noise impacts, improve safety, maintain good relations with our neighbors and the City of Fountain Valley, and to guarantee unrestrained night-time deliveries to GWRS. The District has always attempted to take extra measures to protect the interests of our neighbors around our treatment plants. The signage at the front gate is under study as well as the appropriate level of security and access to areas of the treatment plant. By providing an entrance road to access the Sanitation District, the Water District, NWRI and MWDOC, a water campus could be created that will address both traffic and security issues. A second entrance on Ward is also contemplated that \\Ould provide the same level of access from that direction as well. Once GWRS is online, an increase in visitors is expected and many of them will want to tour the Sanitation District as well. Easy access for visitors and delivery trucks through one entrance provides a better opportunity for security checks. Director John Collins has asked for the general counsels of all agencies to make certain there isn't a liability issue. General Counsel Woodruff reported that he doesn•t see any increased liability with the proposed change but an evaluation will be made. The Committee agreed to send the item through our working committees and report back to the JCC. B. Update on the Renewal of the NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit Jim Colston updated the Committee on ongoing negotiations br the NPDES permit. He described the contents of the operational plan and proposed changes to it and explained the proposed interim limits that \J\lill be in effect until secondary treatment is achieved. Bob Ooten said that Operations has been able to do betterthan the proposed limits through optimizing the system. Two-thirds of our ocean discharge now receives secondary treatment. Disinfection will be included for the duration of the 2004-09 Permit. Engineering is looking at final alternatives for permanent disinfection which will be included in the next permit. Mr. Colston explained that once the pennit is issued, the process requires that the District be sued and a consent decree will then be signed. This will allow the District '\ Minutes of the Steering Committee Page2 November 19, 2003 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMllTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Shirley McCracken announced that the CASA Conference will be held January 21- 24 in Palm Springs. Chair McCracken also announced that she is changing the governance system for the Cooperative Projects Guidance Committee. It will be chaired by the Board's Vice Chair, Steve Anderson, and include the chairs of the three standing committees and the Board of Supervisors representative. They will be the voting members of the committee. This is a significant change from the last five years when city managers and sanitary district managers were also voting members. However, the involvement and input from the cities and the districts we serve remains important and staff will invite all of them to future cooperative projects committee meetings. The Guidance Committee will continue to report to the Board through the PDC Committee, as it has been doing. Chair McCracken reported that the Directors Compensation Task Committee continues to work on refining the policies and procedures. A report will be forthcoming. The report of the Legislative Advocacy Ad Hoc Committee will be made under Agenda Item 8.8. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. Staff Response to Unsolicited Proposals General Manager Blake Anderson reported that staff evaluated the unsolicited proposal from Mr. Gerhardt Van Orie and has recommended that no action be taken at this time. He commented on staff's ongoing practice of providing information that members of the public request. Mr. Anderson also reported that staff has spent a considerable amount of time meeting with the proposer, conducting tours, reviewing data and answering questions but due to construction and operating constraints, as well as a lack of necessary data as out lined in Mr. Ooten's memo, no action is recommended. B. Update on SAWPA Agreement Negotiations Meetings continue between the Sanitation District and SAWPA. The amount of outstanding invoices and interest on overdue amounts has been established. The terms for SAWPA's option to purchase the SARI line have been established including the pricing structure for how SAWPA eventually sells back treatment capacity and sewer capacity to the District if their proposed brine line to the ocean is constructed. The problematic issue at this time is what happens in 2008 if SAWPA hasn't bought the 4-mile stretch of the SARI line or Orange County Flood Control and the Corps of Engineers haven't issued a notice to proceed with the line improvements. Both sides continue to try to reach an agreement. It is anticipated that the agreement will move through the FAHR Committee to the Board in December. Another concern that has surfaced is the progress on the CA Fish and Wildlife Services studies as a result of a federal court case brought by an environmental group to protect the critical habitat of the Santa Ana Sucker. The results must be addressed in the EIS/EIR. If the federal agency studies are not forthcoming, the District could Minutes of the Steering Committee Page4 November 19, 2003 the time it needs to convert to full secondary treatment. Staff will continue to update the Committee on future activities and progress. C. Legislative Consultant Contracts Bob Ghirelli updated the committee on the federal, state and local legislative advocacy activities in the past month. The EPA funding bill is one of four spending bills still pending before Congress and our lobbyists are continuing their work to secure funding for OCSD in that process. In February, Board members will be visiting key members of Congress to bolster support for our $3 million request and begin to lay the groundwork for an authorization in next year's session. State lobbyists are following the changes in Sacramento and looking for opportunities to gain support for the Districfs issues and funding requests. Staff is going to be working more closely with the Water District, the Orange County Business Council and the County of Orange on legislative initiatives of mutual interest. Bob Ghirelli reported that staff was directed to prepare contracts for the consultants at last month's Steering Committee. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board that it: 1) Establish a budget of $320,000 for state and federal legislative advocacy; 2) Authorize the General Manager to enter into Consultant Services Agreements with ENS Resources, Inc., for a contract amount not to exceed $180,000; Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, LLP, for a contract amount not to exceed $60,000; and Townsend Public Affairs, Inc., for a contract amount not to exceed $60,000, for a one-year period, effective January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, which will provide for professional advocacy services in a form approved by General Counsel; and 3) Each contract will be renewable for up to three (3) one-year periods at the discretion of the General Manager. D. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in December were reviewed. · E. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of the Steering Committee Pages November 19, 2003 (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 17, 2003 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 17, 2003 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:12 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Section 54957, to evaluate General Counsel Services. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:55 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. J a Tappan ring Committee Secretary G:lwp.dtalagenda\Steering Committeel03WOVI 111903 SC Minutes.doc ' ., MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, December 3, 2003-5:00 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 3, 2003, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OMTS Directors Present: James M. Ferryman, Chair Anna Piercy, Vice Chair Don Bankhead Carolyn Cavecche Debbie Cook Tod Ridgeway Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair OMTS Directors Absent: Tony Kawashima Paul Walker Staff Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Carol Beekman, Communications Manager Mark Esquer Mike Moore Jim Burrer Layne Baroldi Sonja Wassgren Ana Burkhart Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Others: Pat McGuigan Charles Egigian-Nichols (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMIITEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 December 3, 2003 (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the November 5, 2003 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. b. OMTS03-54 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance, measures for the Technical Services Department. c. OMTS03-55 Receive and file Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance, financial data and performance measures for the Operations and Maintenance Department. d. OMTS03-56 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order 38169-0S issued to M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. for Digester Gas Pipeline Corrosion Protection System Inspection and Repair, Specification No. S-2003-125BD, authorizing an addition of $50,726.83, increasing the total contract amount to $435,036.83. e. OMTS03-57 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Change Order No. 1 to Motion: Purchase Order No. 101470-0B issued to Polydyne Inc., for the Purchase of Cationic Polymer, Specification No. C-2003-143, for an additional amount of $229,000, increasing the estimated amount to $1,059,000, for the contract period ending April 30, 2004. Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 6(a) through (e) under Consent Calendar. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS03-58 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a Professional Services Motion: Agreement with Sun Engineering Services for Indoor/Outdoor Lighting Study, Specification No. CS-2003-145BD, providing a plant lighting study for a total amount not to exceed $110,000. Mark Esquer responded to Directors questions regarding the bids submitted for the project, and briefly described the work the project would entail. Concern was expressed over the price difference in the bids received, and it was suggested that staff request Southern California Edison to provide a list of qualified consultants that could submit proposals for the work. Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Director Debbie Cook opposed, and Director Ridgeway abstained. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page3 December 3, 2003 b. OMTS03-59 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: Motion: (1) Authorize development of a Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) public education and outreach program in accordance with the provisions of California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Order No. RB-2002-0014, General Discharge Requirements for Sewage Collection Agencies; (2) Establish a budget of $150,000 for FOG public education and outreach program which will be divided equally among participating cities/agencies and Orange County Sanitation District; (3) Authorize the General Manager to develop a funding program with the cities/agencies within the District's jurisdiction for development of the FOG public education and outreach program; and ( 4) Authorize the General Manager to award a Consultant Services Agreement for Comprehensive Public Education and Outreach Program for Sewage Collection Agencies, Specification No. CS-2003-172BD, for an amount not to exceed $150,000. Sonja Wassgren reviewed the approach and role the District has taken with regard to the Regional Water Quality Control Board's Sewer System General Waste Discharge Requirements. Directors discussed the allocation of costs among the participating cities/agencies. Also discussed was a reasonable deadline for cities/agencies to agree to participate in this program. Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. c. OMTS03-60 Recommend to the Board of the Directors to approve a change order to Motion: Purchase Order No. 22834-0S, issued to Michael Turnipseed & Associates, for a time extension through June 30, 2004, to provide biosolids Environmental Management System related services, including the performance of biosolids land application site inspections in Kings and Kern counties, for an additional amount of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $115,000. Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. A motion was then moved, seconded and duly carried that Item 12(a) be moved to be considered at this time. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page4 December 3, 2003 (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY a. OMTS03-62 Authorize the General Manager to utilize Riverside County's competitively Motion: bid multi-agency contract and execute an agreement with Softchoice Corporation for licensing Microsoft Enterprise desktop computer software, for a three year period effective December 31, 2003 through December 31, 2006, for a total amount not to exceed $350,000.00. Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology, briefly reviewed the licensing agreement and the costs involved in moving forward with the proposed new agreement. Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS03-61 Long Range Biosolids Management Plan Jim Burrer summarized the key points of the plan. He also briefly discussed the meeting held that day with Integrated Waste Management, and stated the District needs to look for methods of disposing biosolids within the county. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology had no report. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Director of Operations and Maintenance had no report. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services had no report. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance _, and Technical Services Committee Page 5 December 3, 2003 (14) FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for February 4, 2004 at 5 p.m. (15) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:50 p. m. Submitted by: G:\wp.dta\agenda\OMTS\2003\ 1203\ 120303 OMTS Minutes.doc ·~ ., ,; OMTS COMMITTEE Mee ting Date To Bd . of Dir. 12/03/03 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Num be r OMTS0 3-56 12(b ) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten , Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ernest Yeboah , Engineer SUBJECT: INTERPLANT DIGESTER GAS PIPELINE CORROSION PROTECT ION SYSTEM INSPECTION , REPA I R AND REPLACEMENTS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No . 1 to Purchase Order 38169-0S issued to M. J . Schiff & Associates , Inc. for Digester Gas Pipeline Corrosion Protection System Inspection and Repair , Specification No . S-2003-12580 , authorizing an addition of $50 , 726.83, increasing the total amount not to exceed $435 ,036 .83. SUMMARY • The District hired M .J Schiff and Associates to conduct repairs on the interplant Digester gas pipeline . • The repair work included a detailed inspection of the pipelin e . • During the inspection portion of the repair work , additiona l urgent-type repairs were identified . District staff directed the contractor to conduct the urgently needed work. Note : Non-urgent items have been deferred to another project and will be competitively bid. • The ratification of staff action is required and staff is asking the Board to conside r this action . • The e xtra work included: Item Tasks Cost 1. Add three new water blow-off lines to low points in the line. $17,580.90 2 . Replace four corroded fle x ible couplinq s $ 6,358 .30 3. Repair approximately five feet length of severely pitted piping that $14 ,959.10 was damaoed durinq prior construction work . 4 . Replace corroded bolts and nuts on three flanqes $ 5 , 142.48 5 . CCTV inspection and pipeline survey $ 5 ,178.99 6. Repair of additional corrosion protection test station $ 2,363.32 The total cost for all additional work $51 ,583 .09 G:\wp .dt a\agen da\Board Agen da Reports\2 003 Boa rd Agenda Reports\ 1203\lte m 12(b).MJ Schi ff.doc Revised :11124/03 Pag e 1 Item No. 1 . PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTION S A sole source agreement for repair of the lnterplant Digester Gas pipeline to M.J . Schiff & Assoc iates, Inc was approved at the February 26 , 2003 Board Meeting . PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The contracted amount with M . J . Schiff & Associates, Inc., for the or iginal scope of work to repair the line was $384,310 . The extra work requires an increase of $50,726.83 , for a new total contract amount to $435,036.83. See summary (below) and the table showing the detailed breakdown of the Change Order work . Original Contract: Actual charges for Work Difference Additional Work: Remaining in Authorized amount Change Order# 1 amount Original Contract: Change Order #1 New Contract Amount: $384,310.00 $383,453.74 $ 856 .26 $ 51 ,583 .09 $ 856 .09 $ 50 ,726 .83 $384,310 .00 $ 50 ,726.83 $435,036.83 The table below provides breakdown detail of the Change Order work: Summary Table of Additional/Out of Scope Work Provid ed at Request o f the District Description Co st Days Type Stn 145+ 15, pipeline: standing water observed from TV inspection , excavated and installed new blow off (note: much bigger excavation required with sh ie ld, casing Condition Identified needed to be cut to access gas line); it was found that as a result of TV th e HPDG line was electri cally shorted to the 36-in $13,411.60 10 inspections conduct casing. The casing needed to be electrically isolated from the HPDG line , as is the case for the IW line . by OCSD Instal led insulating flange kits at 144+35 and at th e 18x12-in reducer at 150+90 Stn 187 +55, pipeline : standing water observed from TV Condition Identified $1,590.15 2 as a result of OCSD inspection , excavated and installed new blow off TV inspections Stn 189+48, pipeline: stand i ng water observed from TV Condition Identified inspection , excavated and installed new blow off $2,579.15 1 as a result of OCSD TV inspections G:\wp.dta\age nd a \Boa rd Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\ 1203\ltem 12(b).MJ Sch iff .doc Revise<1.11124/03 Page 2 ' ,. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Stn 58+70, valve vault: corroded flexible coupling Unknown/Unforeseen $1,331.66 1 Condition; Not in changed original scope of work Stn 66+00, valve vault: corroded flexible coupling Unknown/Unforeseen $1,331.66 1 Condition; Not in changed original scope of work Stn 133+70, valve vault: corroded flexible coupling Unknown/Unforeseen $1,031.66 1 Condition; Not in changed original scope of work Stn 150+80, valve vault: corroded flexible coupling $1,331.66 1 Unknown/Unforeseen changed Condition Stn 150+90, flange connection: installed insulating $1,331.66 1 Unknown/Unforeseen flange kit Condition Stn 86+00, pipeline: pitting with 65-70% wall loss, repair Unknown/Unforeseen of 6 longitudinal feet of pipe using Clock Spring system $14,959.10 10 Condition; Not in and shrink sleeve coating oriainal scope of work Stn 144+33, flange fitting observed on construction Project Researched pictures, excavated and inspected, changed bolts and $2,563.32 2 Identified Condition; coated. During work, another flanged connection was Not in original scope found at 144+ 10, changed bolts and coat. of work Stn 144+ 1 O: During work at 144+33, another flanged Unknown/Unforeseen connection was found at 144+ 1 O; changed bolts and $1,031.66 1 Condition; Not in coated. original scope of work Stn 191 +20, flange fitting observed on construction $1,547.50 Researched pictures, excavated and found shorted insulating flange, 1 Identified Condition changed corroded bolts and insulated sleeve+ washers Mobilized Jamison crew and backhoe to assist TV Additional Work inspection work (removal of valve vault lids) $1,547.50 1 Requested by OCSD Staff in the field Develop new electronic mapping based on as-built Additional Work $3,631.49 4 Requested by OCSD drawings and GPS survey of existing and new facilities Staff in the field Stn 50+ 15, test station damaged by others, repaired by Unknown/Unforeseen $2,363.32 2 Condition; Not in excavation, splicing, new test station original scope of work Total $51,583.09 39 BUDGET IMPACT This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) D D This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds in the contract amount. ~ D This item has not been budgeted, however there are sufficient funds to cover this extra work. Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 12(b).MJ Schiff.doc Revised:11124103 Page 3 ALTERNATIVES NA CEQA FINDINGS NA ATTACHMENTS None G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 12(b).MJ Schiff.doc Rev1sec1:111241oa Page 4 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 12/3/03 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J . Ooten , Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator : Vicki Henn , Process Engineering OMTS03 -57 12(c) SUBJECT: CATIONIC POLYMER CONTRACT, SPECIFICATION NO. C-2003-143 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 101470-0B issued to Polydyne Inc., for the Purchase of Cationic Polymer, Specification No . C-2003-143 , for an additional amount of $229 ,000 , increasing the estimated amount to $1,059 ,000 , for the contract p eriod ending Apri l 30 , 2004. SUMMARY • The District requested the chemical vendor switch to a different polymer chemical formulation , used for removing water from biosolids . Th e type of polyme r selected by low bid on April 30 , 2004 , by the District was found to cause fo rmation of nitrosodim ethy lamin e (NOMA), a suspected carcinogen, in the seco ndary treated water provided to th e Orange County Wate r Di strict (OCWD). The new chemical is more expensive because more chemical mu st be used to re move the w ate r . • The purpo se of th e change order is for increasing the cationic polymer contract amount to cover the cost for the new polymer. • After beg inning to use the newly BID polym er chemical, OCWD has not been able to meet th e regulated Department of Health Services limits for NOMA, which was traced to th e impacts of the cationic polymer . • Staff is requesting approval of a change order to incre ase the present cationic polymer chemical contract e nding April, 2004, by $229 ,000 for an estimated amo un t of $1 ,059 ,000 . PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None G :\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Ag e nda Repo rts\1203\ltem 12(c).Cati onic Polymer.doc Revi sed : , 1/24/03111 Page 1 PROJECTICONTRACTCOSTSUMMARY • In fiscal year 2003 , Polydyne was awarded a one-year contract (2003-2004) for the amount of $830 ,000. BUDGET IMPACT D This item has been budgeted . (Line item: ) ~ This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • Staff is investigating methods to re-route the process water to Plant No . 2 that might provide for additional polymer selection . There is now a sma ll project in under design to reroute the flows to Plant No. 2 . ALTERNATIVES Reducing the polymer consumption to stay within the current contract amount would significantly increase the biosolids hauling costs because the biosolids would have to go to a landfill. This alternative is not recommended. Changing back to the original polymer would prohibit OCWD from using the water for irrigation and groundwater recharge , and is not recommended. Rerouting the process water to Plant 2 is a viable alternative and will be trialed in the near future. CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements ATTACHMENTS None. G:\w p.dta\agenda \Board Agenda Re p ort s\2003 Board Ag e nda Repo rts\1203\l tem 12(c).Cationic Polymer.doc Revised : 11124103111 Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd . of Dir. 12/03/03 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMTS03 -59 12(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ghirelli , Director of Technical Services Originator: Carol Beekman , Communications Services Manager SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PROGRAM FOR SEWAGE COLLECTION AGENCIES, SPECIFICATION NO. CS-2003-172BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Authorize development of a Fats , Oil and Grease (FOG ) public education and outreach program in accordance with the provis ions of California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Order No. RB-2002-0014, Genera l Discharge Requ irements for Sewage Collection Agencies ; (2) Establish a budget of $150 ,000 for FOG public education and outreach program wh ich will be div ided equally among participating cities/agencies and Orange County Sanitation District ; (3) Authorize the General Manager to develop a funding program with the cities/agencies within the Di strict's jurisdiction for development of the FOG public education and outreach program ; and , (4 ) Authorize the General Manager to award a Consultant Services Agreem ent for Comprehensive Public Education and Outreach Program for Sewage Collection Agencies, Specification No . CS-2003-172BD, for an amount not to exceed $150,000. SUMMARY • December 2004 is the deadline for the Orange County Sanitation District, its member agencies and cities , and other sewage collection agencies in the service area , to develop and implement a comprehensive education and public outreach program to comply w ith the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board 's (RWQCB) Sewer System General Waste Discharge Requ irements . • As part of this program , OCSD has invited each named city/agency to co ll aborate in developing educational tools for a uniform communications plan as required by the RWQCB . • After discussions with the California Regional Quality Contro l Board Santa Ana Region staff , it was determined that the cost of development for the educationa l tools required to meet the Order's intent would be approximately $150 ,000 . • Cities /agencies that choose to participate will split the cost equally. Page 1 • The cost allocation is not based on population since the mon ies collected would be specifically used for the development of a ''tool box" cont aining templates that cou ld be personalized to suit each city/agency. Each participating agency, regardless of size, will receive the same "tool bo x, • Each city/agency is responsible for printing , dubbing and implementation costs needed to accomplish a successful program for their jurisdiction. • Those who chose not to participate will be solely responsible for developing the i r own individual programs . PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total cost of the project is estimated at $150 ,000 . Based on 1 O part icipating agencies/cities , OCSD's share is $15 ,000 . $45,000 has been budgeted for community outreach and education for fiscal year 2003-2004. BUDGET IMPACT ~ This item has been budgeted. D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds . D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OCSD 's Regional Role in the WDR Compliance Effort The WDR states , "Since most of these dischargers are tributary to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), the OCSD may lead a steering committee for all other entities tributary to OCSD, to facilitate compliance by each discharger with the requirements of this Order." OCSD staff has taken a leadership role in establishing and coordinating a monthly Steering Committee meeting consisting of staff from several member agencies. OCSD also coordinates, sets agendas and keeps meeting summaries for monthly WDR general meetings with all member agencies and interested parties during the development of their WDR Sewer System Management Plans (SSMP). Final copies of OCSD's products are sent to the RWQCB and are also being placed on OCSD's web site as a public infor mation item . The development of the Fats , Oils and Grease (FOG) Control Public Education and Outreach Program is a major deliverable required by the WDR. Page 2 .. WDR Deliverables and Schedule OCSD has met all of our deliverable deadlines to date and will continue to do so throughout the development of the SSMP. We do not track the deliverables sent in by the other cities/agencies. The RWQCB staff is responsible for follow up directly on any non- compliance issues. Sewer System Management Plan CSSMPl Time Schedule Task Completion Date Monitoring and Reporting This became effective on April 26, Program No. RS-2002-0014 2002 in compliance with the new Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Monitoring and Reporting requirements Submit SSMP Development September 30, 2002 Plan and Schedule Submit SSO Emergency January 1 , 2003 Response Plan Submit Preventative June 15, 2003 Maintenance Program Leoal Authority July 30, 2004 Grease Disposal Alternatives December 30, 2004 *Grease Control Program December 30, 2004 Complete Sewer Capacity July 30, 2005 Evaluation Complete Sewer Rehabilitation September 30, 2005 Plan for Entire System Submit Final SSMP September 30, 2005 '*Includes public outreach and education component ALTERNATIVES • OCSD would pay the full $150,000 cost of development of all educational materials. Templates would be given to service area cities/agencies and others named in the general order. Each city/agency would then be responsible for implementation costs and publication of materials. Currently, the budget set aside for this program is $45,000. An amount of $105,000 would have to be allocated from contingency budgets to fund the full$150,000. • The cost to each agency/city to participate would be based on population size. CEQA FINDINGS N/A Page 3 ' • 1,• s100 .L a1qeJ01\!laa • sasuodsa~ Aoua6'8f Al!O • SJ.N3WHOV ll V ' '~ I Responses I Yes for $150,000 Yes, with Conditions No No Response 1 Anaheim 1 2 Brea 1 3 Buena Park 1 4 Costa Mesa Sanitary 1 5 County of Orange 1 6 Cypress 1 7 El Toro Water District 1 8 Fountain Valley 1 9 Fullerton 1 10 Garden Grove 1 11 Huntington Beach 1 12 Irvine 1 13 Irvine Ranch Water District 1 14 La Palma 1 15 LaHabra 1 16 Midway City Sanitary District 1 17 Newport Beach 1 18 OCSD 1 19 Orange 1 20 Placentia 1 21 Rossmoor/Los Alamitos 1 22 Santa Ana 1 23 Seal Beach 1 24 Stanton 1 25 Sunset Beach Sanitary District 1 26 Tustin 1 27 Villa Park 1 28 Westminster 1 29 Yorba Linda 1 30 Yorba Linda Water District 1 ITotal 14 4 4 al As of 12/0812003 G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 12(d).1 Admin/130/SW 1 of 1 ·~ Large Program Elements -Tools Development Restaurant Brochure Public Education and Outreach Brochure Training Video for Restaurant Poster(2)-Restaurant and General Public Press Release( s) Print Ad -Copy ready Public Service Announcement School Education Program Display Board/Booth Language translation of Brochures Poster, Print Ad, coloring book OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date T o Bel. of Dir. 12/03/03 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMTS0 3-60 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P . Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: Layne Baroldi , Legal and Regulatory Affairs Liaison SUBJECT: Biosolids Management Services GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 12(e) Approve a change order to Purchase Order No . 22834-0S , iss ued to Michael Turnipseed & Associates , for a time extension through June 30 , 2004, to provide biosolids Environmental Management System related services , including the performance of biosolids land application site inspections in Kings and Kern counties , for an additional amount of $15 ,000, for a total amount not to exceed $115 ,000. SUMMARY • Since 1998, Michael Turnipseed & Associates has been providing biosolids -re lated services to the District in both Kern and Kings Counties. • With the recent certification by the National Biosolids Partnership of the Di strict 's biosolids Environmental Management System (EMS), Michael Turnipseed & Associate s efforts are focused on the performance of biosolids land application site inspections in King s and Kern counties. • A contract extension through June 30 , 2004 is proposed to assist the District in conforming to the provision s of its biosolids Environmental Management System . • The amount expended on Michael Turnipseed & Associate s' services since 1998 recently exceeded $100 ,000 thus necessitating Board approval for this contract extension. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY $100 ,000 since 1998; with total contract amount not to exceed $115,000. Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT (gJ This item has been budgeted . D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted . D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES The District could attempt to secure another firm if the services of Michael Turnipseed & Associates are not retained through the end of the fiscal year. Staff intends to review the program need s in the coming months and go out to bid for these services ne xt fiscal year. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None LB:lb G :\wp.dta\agenda\OMTS\2003\ 1203\06. 03-60 .Turnipseed.doc Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Patrick Miles , Director of Information Technology Originator : Rich Castillon , Manager Meeting Date 12/05/03 Item Nu m be r OMTS03-62 SUBJECT: MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE LICENSING AGREEMENT WITH SOFTCHOICE CORP GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize t he General Manager to uti lize Riverside County's competitively bid mu lt i-agency contract and e xecute an agreement with Softcho ice Corporation for licensi ng Microsoft Enterprise desktop computer software , for a th ree year peri od effective December 31 , 2003 through December 31 , 2006 , fo r a total amount no t to e xce ed $350 ,000 .00. SUMMARY • In December of 2001 , OCSD entered into a three year agreement with ASAP Software for licensing Microsoft Enterprise desktop computer software . • On November 24, 2003 , th e California Counties Information Services Director's Association (CCISDA) negotiated a more favorable veh icl e under which Counties cou ld can opt out of year three of the current agreem e nt and beg i n a new three year agreement at a subst antial savings. • Based on the agreement w it h Microsoft, the CCISDA, us i ng Riverside County as the lead agency, released a RFP seeking the most competitive pricing. • SOFTCHOICE CORP provided a cost w ith a three year commitment of $146.50 (plus tax) per computer per year . Th is compares favorably to the current cost of $196 .20 (plus ta x) per computer per year . • OCSD curren t ly has 7 00 eligible desktop and notebook computers . • Based on projected personne l and consultant staffing , it is a ntic ipated that the District's total number of eligible computers wil l i ncrease to 750 by September 2006 . Page 1 To Bel . of Dir. 12/17/03 I tem Number 12(f) PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Best Case: ~ TOTAL PROJECTED THREE-YEAR COST= $331,630 Worst Case: > TOTAL PROJECTED THREE-YEAR COST= $350,000 BUDGET IMPACT fZI This item has been budgeted . (Line item: 930.54030) D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) ALTERNATIVES Continue with the current agreement with ASAP Software for one year at the cost of $196.20 (plus tax) per computer for a total of $147 , 983.00 for one year, which would result in an increase in cost of $43,441 .00. CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS None Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeti ng Date 12/03/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number OMTS03-58 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J . Ooten , Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: David Halverson , Senior Electrical Engineer SUBJECT: INDOOR/OUTDOOR LIGHTING STUDY, SPECIFICATION NO . CS -2003-145BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION T o Bd . of Dir. 12/17/03 Item Number 12(g) Approve a Professional Services Agreement, with Sun Engineering Services for Indoor/Outdoor Lighting Study, Specification No . CS -2003-145BD , providing a plant lighting study for a total amount not to exceed $110 ,000 . SUMMARY Please see ''Additional Information " section which was added as a result of questions at the 1213103 OMTS meeting. • A plant lighting study was budgeted to assess safe and proper plant lighting systems . The purpose of the study is to have a qualified lighting expert review the e xisting plant lighting and design standards and provide recommendations for revising the standards for future projects and to propose retrofit projects to improve energy efficiency , lighting quality, and reduce light pollution of surrounding areas. • The District issued an RFP for the plant lighting study in Ju ly 2003 to five lighting consulting firms and received two proposals . An evaluation team selected Sun Engineering as the more responsive of the two. Sun Engineering offered a bid of $110 ,000 while the other firm proposed $19 ,850. The second firm did not provide a proposal that was responsive to the scope of work. • Staff recommends an award to Sun Engineering. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS 1. A budget for the Plant Lighting Study was included in the FY 2003/04 budget as SP-93 , on page 87 for a total projected budget of $132 ,000. G :\wp .d ta\agenda\Board Ag e nda Report s\2003 Board Ag enda Reports\1203\ltem 12(g).S un E ngineering.doc Page 1 PROJECTICONTRACTCOSTSUMMARY No new authorization of e xpenditures is being requested at this time. BUDGET IMPACT ~ This item has been budgeted . (Line item : Section 8 , Page 87) D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds . D Th is item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) No new authorization of expenditures is being requested at this time . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Southern California Edison lighting expert walked the plant with staff one night and gave some recommendations for improvements . He also suggested four private consulting f irms that could provide the direction the District needed . A detailed scope was prepared that required a consultant to utilize a certified lighting ex pert to survey the e x isting plant lighting and review the Engineering design guidelines and standards to : 1. Evaluate : • Energy efficiency • Adequacy of light provided for tasks • Unnecessary light pollution 2 . Provide recommendations for revising the Engineering standards for future projects to provide consistency and optimal lighting designs 3 . Propose retrofit projects with positive paybacks to improve the e xisting lighting. The RFP was sent to four consultants ; Ene rTech System s, Amtech Lighting Service , Sylvania Lighting Service , Vista Universal Lighting . Proposals were received from Vista Universal Lighting and Sun Engineering . The Sun proposal included all the information required by the RFP . The Vista proposal was judged unacceptable by the evaluation team because it: • Had no profile of firm • Didn 't include the firm 's experience • Only prov ided sub consultant resume's none for prime • Didn 't have a project organization section • Had a poor work plan description and no schedule or QC approach • Was missing a cost or man-hour breakdown The Sun Engineering proposal meets all the requirements of the RFP and is capable of successfully completing the study. Because the Vista proposal was missing many of the required sections it was impossible to determine if they understood the scope or G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Ag enda Reports \2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 12(g).S un Engin ee ring .doc Page 2 could perform the work. It was also not possible to evaluate why their proposed price was so low because of the missing man-hour breakdown. ALTERNATIVES Not perform the study, which would continue present practices of determining lighting on a project-by-project basis. CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS None JB/DH :sa/pjj G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 12(g).Sun Engineering.doc Page 3 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING. DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: Alice Jempsa, Vice Chair Patty Campbell John Collins Norm Eckenrode Beth Krom Patsy Marshall Bob McGowan Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Directors Absent: Brian Donahue, Chair (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance John Linder, Construction Manager Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Matt Smith, Engineering Manager Julian Sabri, Engineer Jim Burror, Senior Engineer Simon Watson, Maintenance Supervisor Ed Torres, Engineering Manager Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager Jennifer Cabral, Public Information Specialist Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Charles Nichols-Egiggian Mike Moore Director Alice Jempsa, Chair pro tern, chaired the meeting in Director Donahue's absence. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. PDC Committee Minutes Page2 December 4, 2003 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair pro tern Alice Jempsa did not make a report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin reported on the public workshop that was held on the Ellis Avenue Pump Station. Jennifer Cabral stated that a feedback report will be created and it will be added to the EIR. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. 8) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-g) a. RECEIVE. FILE. AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the November 6, 2003 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached are the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%). This is an information only item. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There are two change orders this month for PDC Committee approval. c. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Attached is the PSA and Addenda Report. This is an information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There were no PSAs and one Addendum approved by the General Manager from October 24 through November 20, 2003. d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS ... ~ PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 December 4, 2003 REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only item. f. PDC03-90 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 11 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1 -37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of $20,680, increasing the total contract amount to $71,218,814. g. PDC03-91 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Approve a budget amendment of $189,396 for Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, for a total budget of $7,767,396; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $31,556, increasing the total contract amount to $4,231, 7 42. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 8(a) through (g) under Consent Calendar. (9) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-h) a. PDC03-92 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to solicit proposals and subsequently award a Consultant Services Agreement for Public Outreach Services for Construction Projects, Specification No. CS-003-166BD, in an amount not to exceed $400,000, for the period March 1, 2004 through February 29, 2005, with the option of four one-year renewals. Jennifer Cabral made a presentation on the scope of work for this project. With the increased number of construction projects scheduled to begin in the next couple of years, additional resources will be necessary to provide the support. Director Patsy Marshall asked to sit on the review team because of her background in communications and expressed concern about the estimated cost. It was suggested that an additional full-time employee be considered to assist in this effort. Procedures should be developed that staff can follow when complaints are received. Construction communication information should be solicited only when needed. Once the procedures are in place, it should become easier with each project. General Manager Blake Anderson responded that staff will provide further assessment of this program and will report back to the committee. The committee agreed to this action. PDC Committee Minutes -• Page4 December 4, 2003 b. PDC03-93 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Final Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, dated November 2003, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. Jim Burrer summarized the key points of the plan. There was a discussion of the safety of land applied Class A and Class B biosolids and Mike Moore mentioned that the current regulations are sufficient to protect public health. c. PDC03-94 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with HOR Engineering for the design of Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation, Job No. P1-82, for a total amount not to exceed $3,125,026. David Ludwin reported that this project is one of the major projects necessary to move to full secondary treatment. Staff was asked to talk with NWRI about a recent new process for secondary treatment and to bring back a report to the PDC Committee. The committee directed staff to make the general manager the authorizing agent for approving task orders totaling $100,000, rather than the director of engineering. d. PDC03-95 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates providing for professional services for Supplemental Full Secondary Treatment CEQA Documentation, Job No. J-40-10, for an amount not to exceed $154,992. e. PDC03-96 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation for engineering services for design of Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains, Bitter Point Pump Station to Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-58, for an amount not to exceed $1,018,907. f. PDC03-97 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, providing for construction support services for an additional amount of $539,610, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,951,021. g. PDC03-98 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard PDC Committee Minutes Pages December 4, 2003 Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, providing for additional engineering construction support services for an additional amount of $264,900, increasing the total amount not to exceed $2,019,411. h. PDC03-99 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source purchase order agreement with NRG, Inc. for Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79, providing for the upgrade and reinstallation of nine existing and upgraded turbochargers, for an amount not to exceed $1,570, 191 including sales tax and delivery. Matt Smith and Julian Sabri provided the directors with background information and described the warranties for the project. Staff will make minor wording changes to the agenda report to better clarify the description of the project. Staff time will be reported as an allocation. (10) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (11) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY David Ludwin introduced Olga Cervantes, the District's new contracts administrator. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (14) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 5, 2004 at 5 p.m. PDC Committee Minutes Page6 December 4, 2003 (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:53 p.m. Submitted by: n appan Committee Secretary G:\wp.dta\agenda\PDC\2003\Minutes\ 120403 draft PDC Minutes.doc I I f PDC COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitat ion Distr ict FROM: David Ludwin , Director of Engineering Originator: Dean Fisher, Senior Engineer Meeting Da te 12/04/03 Item Number PDC0 3·90 SUBJECT: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. P1-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION To Bd. of Dir. 12/17/03 Item Nu mber 1 3 (b) Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No . P1-37 , w ith Margate Construction , authorizing an addition of $20,680, increasing the total contract amount to $71 ,218,814 . SUMMARY Background • Job Number P1-37, Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, includes the construction of 16 new p rimary clarifiers w ith all support equi pment, improvements to ex isting Primary Clarifiers 6-15, and improvements to Primary Clarifie rs 1-5 . • Brown and Caldwell prepared the plans and specifications and the c ontract was award e d t o Margate Construction on Oct ober 24 , 2001. • This ch a nge order incl udes five items of additional work, and two items of deleted work. There are no errors and two omissions associated with this ch ange order. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Liquid ated da mages on this project are $3,000 per day and there are no bonus provis ions . Contract Schedule Contract Start Date Original Con t ract Com p letion Dat e Total Numbe r of Ch a nge Orders to Date Current Contract Completion Date Actual Completion Date Days Subject to Liquidated Damages January 7, 2002 November 7 , 2005 11 April 8 , 2006 N/A 0 Pag e 1 Change Order Content Item Description Amount Days Type 1 Clarifier Slab Connection $14 ,693 0 Changed Condition 2 Doorway Structural Reinforcement $1 ,533 0 Omission 3 Truck Pad Modifications $(2,314) 0 Desiqn Chanqe 4 Flight Detector Modifications $(2 1,478) 0 Design Change 5 Blower and Fan Motor Cables $3 , 142 0 Omission 6 P1-76 Piping Connection $5 ,341 0 Other Project 7 Fiber Optic Modifications $19,763 0 Changed Condition Total Chan~e Order $20,680 0 Job Completion The project is 63% complete. PRIOR COMMITIEE/BOARD ACTIONS The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on October 24 , 2001 . Please refer to the attached Change Orde r Status Report for more information on previous change orders . PROJECTICONTRACTCOSTSUMMARY Original Contract Price Previously Authorized Changes This Change Change Orders to Date Percentage Increase to Date Amended Contract Price BUDGET IMPACT $ 70,366,000 $ 832,134 $ 20,680 $ 852 ,814 1.21 % $ 71 ,218 ,814 ~ This item has been budgeted . (Line item : Section a, GIP , P1 -37) D This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. Page 2 I • • ..,, .• CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order GC:ms G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\P1 -37 AR 120403.doc Page 3 OAJGINAL PROJEc:Tll'HASE AUTHORIZED BUDG.ET Ph4u 1 ·Pr--n.-~ Ph.Qse 2 -Pralimlnarv O.tlon Pho\se 3 -Oul<1n ~ 4 -Con:.uucston ?Mw 5 -Conwnlss.onno Phos• 6 • Clo,~t l'hou1 ·r-~ PROJECT TOTAL s IA .. mburuatM C«u PROJECT NET PSA s s s B UD GET INFO RMATI ON T ABLE Pr imary Clarlllers No. 16-3 1 and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37 C:URREHT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTllORIZED AUTHORIZATION BUDGET WlCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REO\IEST 77.000 s nooo s nooo 315.000 s 315.000 s 31S 000 4 .542.000 s -'.542,000 s 4.S42 000 s n .543.976 s 20.680 s n.S&-:sse s n..5-l3v78 s 20.AO s 281 880 s 281 .880 s 50.000 s 50,000 s S.751.144 s 12l.680l s s 730 464 s 88.561.000 s s 88,561 .000 s 82 . .in976 s 20.680 I I $ 88.561.000 s s 88.561.000 82,477,976 20,680 s 5 .205.904 s 205 90J 5.20S.90ol 7 1.1 98.134 20.880 s 71.218.8 14 71.198,134 20.680 PROPOSED ESTIMATED TOTAL EXPEHIXTURE TO AUTHORIZATIOll DATE s n .ooo s 76974 s 315.000 s 315.552 s 4 .S.i2.000 $ 4 546.501 s n S64 656 s 46 200108 s $ s s 82.498,656 s 51.139.135 $ 82.498,656 $ St,139.135 S.205.904 $ 4.720.050 71.218,814 .W,585.000 • Note: Authonztd Funds and E.xpenchrures 10 Date 1n Ph3se .i include ConsttuctJon Adrrwms~bon and lnspKbon costs from piVIOUS ph.ls1ng pnor to 7/1/03 " ESTIMATED EXPENDED TO DATE(,_\ •00'· 100'. 100•. w . 62'. 02'· su·. 63 .. • CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT PRIMARY CLARIFIER$ 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES ITEM CONTRACT CON0.1 APPROVAL DATE 6/23/1999 12/19/2001 $ $ * CO NO. 2 811/2002 $ •• CO NO. 3 10/21/2002 $ CO NO. 4 12/1812002 $ CO NO. 5 2/26/2003 $ CO NO. 6 4/23/2003 $ CO NO. 7 6/2512003 $ JOB NO. P1·37 CONTRACT COST CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE TO DATE INCREASE 70,366,000.00 $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 75,214.00 $ 70,441,214.00 0.11 48,736.00 $ 70,489,950.00 0.18 356,059.00 $ 70,846,009.00 0.68 33,527.00 $ 70,879,536.00 0.73 54,992.00 $ 70,934,528.00 0.81 14,750.00 $ 70,949,278.00 0.83 CO NO. 8 8/27/2003 $ 5,363.00 $ 70,954,641.00 0.84 CO NO. 9 10/2212003 $ 187.452.00 $ 71,142,093.00 1.10 CO NO. 10 11/19/2003 $ 56,041.00 $ 71, 198, 134.00 1.18 i.CONQDt1J IF~0 P-e.P.din0:;Mf '$ 'u '''.20;GQQ~Q01 $~;;: '71.218;$:1~~oo:i ?:.< .··. ··.· • Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 •• Approved by General Manager per delagated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 AUTHORIZED TIME (DAYS) 1400 0 49 0 82 0 21 0 0 0 0 AUTHORIZED TIME TO DATE (DAYS) 1400 1400 1449 1449 1531 1531 1552 1552 1552 1552 1552 \WY .. )~.~ Y/ <· : ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 1of5 Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: December 17. 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities. Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Dedt:Ast) $20,680.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -CLARIFIER SLAB CONNECTION This item modifies the specified waterstop detail at the connection of the proposed Primary Clarifiers 16 and 17 (PC 16-17) floor slabs to the south wall of the existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15 (PC 6-15), provides for rehabilitation of four existing south wall vertical expansion joints, and removes interfering portions of concrete on the PC 6-15 Effluent Distribution Structure. Construction of the existing south wall provided waterstop for future construction. However, the P1 -37 design increased the slope of the proposed PC 16/17 slabs, changing the elevation at which the proposed slabs join the existing south wall. This required new waterstop along 437 feet of the existing south wall at the elevation of the proposed slabs. Also, it was discovered that the existing wall contained a different type of waterstop than anticipated, requiring a different connection detail to ensure a water tight structure. The work was accomplished on contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-012). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ITEM 2-DOORWAY STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT $14,693.00 O Calendar Days This item adds structural reinforcement above two openings to the Primary Clarifiers 16-31 East Scum Gallery stairway and storage room. Two reinforced concrete 24"x 12"x 6' beams were recommended by the design consultant in order to improve structural support. The work was accomplished on contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO- P137-126). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,533.00 O Calendar Days ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P .0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 of 5 Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: December 17. 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities. Job No. P1 -37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 3 -TRUCK PAD MODIFICATIONS This item provides a credit to reduce the width of the concrete pad in the chemical truck unloading area from 30 feet to 15 feet. This change moves the truck unloading area out of the path of vehicles traveling north on Fuentes Road. This improves traffic flow, and in the event of chemical spill, reduces vehicular interference with cleanup efforts. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-134). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ITEM 4 -FLIGHT DETECTORS MODIFICATIONS $(2,314.00) O Calendar Days This item deletes the flight detector systems specified for the dilute sludge basins and modifies the flight detector systems specified for the thickened sludge basins in Primary Clarifiers 6-31 due to concerns about future maintenance costs, and potential tripping hazards. Staff determined that the (72) flight detector systems for the dilute sludge basins could be deleted at a cost savings to the project. This eliminates 1,000 feet of %" PVC coated aluminum conduit and 5,000 feet of cable. The remaining (32) flight detector systems for the thickened sludge basins will be modified to address concerns about corrosion. Intrinsically safe relays will be added ·to allow the conduit within the tanks to be changed from PVC coated aluminum to PVC. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (8) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-136). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ITEM 5 -BLOWER AND FAN MOTOR CABLES $(21,478.00) O Calendar Days This item modifies the cable size for (3) agitation air blowers and (2) existing top deck fans. Per the National Electric Code (NEC), the specified cables were undersized. This change is necessary for code compliance, and for worker and equipment safety. This change was found prior to the purchase and installation of the specified 1,200 feet of cable. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-137). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,142.00 O Calendar Days ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P .0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 3 of 5 Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: December 17. 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities. Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 6 -P1-76 PIPING CONNECTION This item adds an 8" tee, plug valve, and blind flange for a future sludge pipeline connection from the P1 -76 Trickling Filter project. This change is required for a future connection to serve the P1 -76 Trickling Filter project. The decision to connect at this location was made after the P1-37 design was completed. Installation of the fittings concurrent with this project results in the least disruption and lowest construction cost. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-139). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,341.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7 -FIBER OPTIC SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS This item modifies the fiber optic system. In general, the changes consist of re-routing through spare tubes in the tube cables and changes to the number of fiber count to accommodate future fiber optic requirements. These modifications reflect changes to the plant fiber optic system which occurred after design of this project, and are necessary for compatibility with the new fiber optic system. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (8) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-140). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $19,763.00 0 Calendar Days $20,680.00 O Calendar Days The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. Page 4 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: December 17. 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities. Job No. P1 -37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: Original Contract Time: Original Completion Date: Time Extension this C.O.: Total Contract Time Extension: Revised Contract Time: Revised Final Completion Due Date: Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Actual Final Completion Date: January 7, 2002 1,400 Days November 7,2005 ODays 152 Days 1,552 Days April 8, 2006 N/A N/A Original Contract Price Prev. Authorized Changes This Change (Add) (Dedblct) Amended Contract Price $ 70.366,000.00 $ 832, 134.00 $ 20.680.00 $ 71,218,814.00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 5 of 5 Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: December 17. 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities. Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Board Authorization Date: December 17, 2003 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John D. Linder, P.E. Construction Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION Contractor EOMS/003757713 Date Date Date .. I I ! I .~_ ...... ., .......... _ ·-~JI -7:;.'", ,-; "'• 4 t11 ,.-.. ~ ..... •.ll J.J----- Item 1 -Clarifier Slab Connection Item 3 -Truck Pad Modifications ed m s\0037 57715 Cha nge Order No . 11 1 Ex is ting Waters top Infl ue nt C hann e l Del eted Portion . of Truck Pad November 2003 Waterstop Cross -Section Item 1 -Clarifier Slab Connection Flight Flight Item 4 -Flight Detectors PDC COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation Distr ict FROM: David Ludwin , Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer Meeting Date 12/04/03 Item Number PDC0 3-91 SUBJECT: SHORT TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION , JOB NO. J -87 GENERAL MANAGER 'S RECOMMENDATION To Bd . of Dir. 12/17/03 Item Number 13(c) (1) Approve a budget amendment of $189 ,396 for Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction , Job No. J-87 , for a total budget of $7,767 ,396; and (2) Ratify Change Order No . 2 to Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J -87, with J.F. Shea Construction , Inc., authorizing an addition of $31,556, increasing the total contract amount to $4 ,231 ,742 . SUMMARY Background • Job No. J-87 provides for new Chem ical Feed Facilities necessary to provide disinfection of the plant effluent at Plant Nos . 1 and 2 . This project is required to comply with the District's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Ocean Discharge Permit. • Black & Veatch prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to J.F. Shea Construction Inc ., on December 18 , 2002 . • Change Order No . 2 includes eight items of added work to Job No. J-87 . There are two om issions and no errors associated with this Change Order. The contract includes liquidated damages at $2 ,000 per day and no bonus provisions . Contract Schedule Contract Start Date Original Contract Completion Dat e Total Number of Change Orders to Date Current Contract Completion Date Actual Completion Date Days Subject to Liquidated Damages February 24, 2003 October 31 , 2003 2 November 20 , 2003 N/A 0 Page 1 Change Order No. 2 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Double Containment Pipeline $3 ,418 0 Design Change Additions 2 Electrical Repairs at the Final Effluent $4,243 0 Changed Condition Sampler BuildinQ 3 Undisclosed GroundinQ Rods $1 ,681 0 Changed Condition 4 Additional Concrete Pads and Pipe $2 ,992 0 Omission Racks 5 Neoprene Pad Additions for FRP $7,676 0 Design Change Tanks 6 Refurbish MCC Buckets $2,343 0 Changed Condition 7 Electrical and Civil Changes at Plant 2 $6 ,899 0 Changed Chemical Feed Facilities Condition/Omission 8 Mechanical Changes at Plant 2 $2,304 0 Design Change Chemical Feed Facilities Total Change Order No. 2 $31,556 0 Job Completion • The project is now 95 % complete. PRIOR COMMITIEE/BOARD ACTIONS The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on December 18 , 2002. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for information on all previous Change Orders. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price Previously Authorized Changes This Change (add) Change Orders to Date Percentage Increase to Date Amended Contract Price BUDGET IMPACT $ 4 ,298 ,247 $ (98 ,061) $ 31 ,556 $ ( 66 ,505) (1.55%) $ 4 ,231,742 D This item has been budgeted . (Line item : Section 8 -Page 74) ~ This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) Page 2 ' .. A budget increase of $189,396 is being requested. Funds in Phase 7 (Contingency) and the proposed budget increase are being moved to other phases to cover staff labor costs in phases 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Please see attached Budget Information Table. The proposed source of funding is from the Orange County Sanitation District Capital Improvement Reserves. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan El R that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order CH:dm G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\J-87 AR CO #2 120403.doc Page 3 ORIGINAL PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZ.ED BUDGET Phase 1 · Proiect Development Pho!Wt 2 · Prehmmarv Oes.iqn $ 116.000 s Phase 3 · Desion $ 1.630,000 s PhOse 4 · Con.strucilOn s 5.246.000 s Phase 5 -CommiSS1onino $ 141 .000 $ Phase 6 · Clos&-Out s 35.000 s Phase 7 · Contmaencv $ 410.000 s PROJECT TOTAL $ 7.578.000 $ PROJECT NET $ 7.578.000 s Desi n PSA 447.920 Con~rucuon Contract 4.298.247 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE S HORT TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION JOB NO. J -87 ,,s CURRENT P ROPOSED PROPOSED FUHDS THIS PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHOR.12.ED TO AUTHORIZATION BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DAT E REOUEST /DECREASE "' if' 116,000 s 10084 s 126.08-i $ 116.000 s 10,084 1,630.000 s 109,116 s 1 739.11 6 s 1,630.000 $ 109.116 5202.386 s 404,659 $ S.607.045 $ S.202.386 s 324.659 141,000 $ 39,895 s 18 0 .895 $ 141,000 $ 39,895 35.000 s 79.256 $ 114.256 s 35.000 s 79.256 JS3 .614 $ 14 53.614 s 7.578.000 $ 189,396 s 7.767.396 $ 7, 124,386 $ 563 ,010 1 1 PROPOSED ESTIMATED TO TAL EXPEJlDfTURE AUTHORIZATIO~ TO DATE s 126.084 $ 126 .084 $ 1.739.11 6 s 1.739,116 s 5 .527.045 $ 5.159.Sn $ 180,895 $ 180.895 s 114.256 s 74.568 $ 7 ,687.396 $ 7.280.240 7.578.000 $ 7.767,396 7, 124.386 $ 563,010 $ 7.687.396 s 7.280.240 909.128 909.128 s 909,128 909 ,128 788,000 J .200.186 31 .556 4 .231,742 $ 4 .200.186 $ 31.556 4.231,742 $ 4.041.020 ' ITEM APPROVAL DATE CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT SHORT TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION JOB NO. J-87 CONTRACT COST CONTRACT COST TO DATE PERCENTAGE INCREASE (Cumulative) AUTHORIZED TIME (DAYS) AUTHORIZED TIME TO DATE (DAYS) ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 1of7 Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Job: Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Job No. J-87 Consultant: Black & Veatch Date: December 17. 2003 Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Ded1:1ct) $31,556.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -DOUBLE CONTAINMENT PIPELINE ADDITIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to add two double containment pipelines at the new Bleach Station located at Plant No. 1. This item included 140 feet of Schedule 80 CPVC piping and 11 O feet of Schedule 80 PVC piping and termination fittings. Extra work included additional excavation activities needed to widen the trench at Tunnel #18 for the new double containment pipelines. The change was requested by staff to accommodate spare bleach lines that will be needed in the future upon completion of the Trickling Filter Rehabilition and New Clarifiers Project (Job No. P1-76). District staff decided that it would be more cost effective to add the additional spare pipelines now, rather than adding them later under a separate contract. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account in accordance with Division 1 , Section 43.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 2, and J.F. Shea's letter dated October 23, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ITEM 2-ELECTRICAL REPAIRS ATTHE FINAL EFFLUENT SAMPLER BUILDING $3,418.00 0 Calendar Days This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to repair the 1-inch and 3/4-inch signal, communication, and power conduits located in the sidewalk from the Electrical Building to the Final Effluent Sampler Building at Plant No. 2 that was damaged during saw-cutting activities. Underground electrical conduits were undisclosed on the contract drawings. This item included additional excavation activities, removal and replacement of approximately 5 cubic yards of concrete sidewalk, 40 feet of 3/4-inch Galvanized Rigid Conduit, 20 feet of 3/4-inch Aluminum OCAL Red Conduit, a 12" x 12" x 6" NEMA 4X Stainless Steel Junction Box, and miscellaneous straps, struts, anchors, and couplings necessary to complete the extra work. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account in accordance with Division 1, Section 43.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 5, and J.F. Shea's letter dated October 24, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,243.00 0 Calendar Days ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 of 7 Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Job: Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Job No. J-87 Consultant: Black & Veatch ITEM 3 -UNDISCLOSED GROUNDING RODS Date: December 17. 2003 This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to re-install two grounding rods and repair the grounding loop system at the existing Plant No. 1 Bleach Facility. Two existing grounding rods had to be removed because of their conflict with the excavation of the new Bleach Station and the duct bank between the southwest comer of the new Bleach Station and Tunnel #18. The grounding rods were not shown on the contract drawings. This item included 50 feet of bare copper wire, two cadweld shots, and two 12-inch round ground vaults with lids necessary to repair the grounding loop system. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account in accordance with Division 1 , Section 43.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 10, and J.F. Shea's letter dated October 23, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ITEM 4 -ADDITIONAL CONCRETE PADS AND PIPE RACKS $1,681.00 O Calendar Days This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to provide two concrete pads and four overhead pipe racks at Plant No. 2. The contract documents did not indicate placement of a concrete pad for the electrical equipment located on the west side of the Surge Tower or placement of a concrete pad for the Remote Input I Output Control Panel (27GFCP027) located at the Plant No. 2 Bleach Station. This design improvement was recommended by District staff in an effort to protect the equipment from standing water and to provide a safer working environment. In addition, it was determined that four additional overhead pipe racks were needed at the Ocean Outfall Booster Station Wet Well in order to eliminate a potential trip hazard at that location. This item included; saw cutting and removal of approximately 30 square feet of asphaltic concrete, forming and placing rebar for the two concrete pads, 1 cubic yard of concrete, 100 feet of Stainless Steel Strut, and miscellaneous nuts, bolts, and fittings required for the four pipe racks. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account in accordance with Division 1, Section 43.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 23, and J.F. Shea's letter dated October 23, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,992.00 O Calendar Days -' .. · 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P .0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 3 of 7 Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Job: Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Job No. J-87 Consultant: Black & Veatch ITEM 5-NEOPRENE PAD ADDITIONS FOR FRP TANKS Date: December 17. 2003 This item is for labor, material, and delivery charges required to provide five 1/4-inch thick Neoprene Pads between the five concrete tank foundations and the five new Chemical Storage Tanks provided for this project. Two of the Chemical Storage Tanks were installed at the new Bleach Facility located at Plant No. 1 and three of the Chemical Storage Tanks were installed at the new Sodium Bisulfite Facility located at Plant No. 2. The contract documents did not indicate placement of a protective pad between the tanks and their associated concrete tank pads. This design enhancement is necessary to extend the useful life of the Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic Chemical Storage Tanks. The neoprene pad will reduce the wear on the bottom of the tanks due to friction effects prevalent from movement between the tank and the pad. This item was accomplished by the Contractors force account in accordance with Division 1 , Section 43.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 24, and J.F. Shea's letter dated October 23, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ITEM 6 -REFURBISH MCC BUCKETS $7,676.00 o Calendar Days This item is for labor, material, and equipment to install mechanical parts and properly sized cables necessary to retrofit two Motor Control Center electrical buckets (MCC-BB Section #403 & MCC-CH Section #405) located at the Plant No. 2 Ocean Outfall Booster Station and the electrical building near the Plant No. 2 Bleach Station. These MCC buckets provide power to the new Sodium Bisulfite Station and the Bleach Station located at Plant 2. During the design phase of this project, the aforementioned MCC buckets were operational. During the construction phase it was discovered that several parts were missing from the referenced existing MCC buckets. The extra work to refurbish the non- operational electrical buckets was not included in the Contractor's original Scope of Work. The work scope additions in this item are, 2 -100 amp I 480 volt Breakers, 1 -Westinghouse operating mechanism for breaker installation, 3 -compression lugs, 1 -12" blank door, 1 -6-inch complete bucket, 1 -hardware kit. This item was accomplished by the Contractors force account in accordance with Division 1, Section 43.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 25, and J.F. Shea's letter dated October 23, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,343.00 O Calendar Days ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P .0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 4 of 7 Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Job: Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Job No. J-87 Consultant: Black & Veatch Date: December 17. 2003 ITEM 7 -ELECTRICAL AND CIVIL CHANGES AT PLANT 2 CHEMICAL FEED FACILITIES This item is for labor, material, and equipment to perform electrical and civil changes at Plant No. 2. The following summarizes the changes and justification for the changes. A. The Contractor was directed to purchase and install additional materials necessary to combine the 11 power11 and 11fail 11 conductors into one conduit before entering each transmitter. The transmitters provided by the District contained only three openings and the design drawings show 4 conduits entering the transmitter. Included in this sub item are the following additions; 2 -8" x 8" x 6" Stainless Steel NEMA 4X Junction Boxes, 20 1" Red OCAL Aluminum T's, 20 1" Red OCAL Aluminum LB's, 20 1" Red OCAL Aluminum Unions, 20 1" Red OCAL Aluminum Hubs and Miscellaneous Stainless Steel nuts, bolts, and washers B. The Contractor was directed to remove, transport, and properly dispose of undisclosed underground concrete near the truck aprons at the Plant No. 2 existing Bleach Station. Upon removal of the asphalt and excavation for installation of the truck aprons, abandoned concrete was found which needed to be demolished and removed. C. The Contractor was directed to install additional reinforcing steel for the canopy pedastals at the Plant No. 1 new Bleach Station and the Plant No. 2 new Sodium Bisulfite Station. The design consultant recommended 1,612 pounds of additional rebar under the column supports at selected column locations at the new Plant No. 1 Bleach Station and Plant No. 2 Bisulfite Station. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account in accordance with Division 1, Section 43.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 26, and J.F. Shea's letter dated October 23, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,899.00 O Calendar Days ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 5of7 Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Job: Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Job No. J-87 Consultant: Black & Veatch Date: December 17. 2003 ITEM 8 -MECHANICAL CHANGES AT PLANT NO. 2 CHEMICAL FEED FACILITIES This item is for labor, material, and equipment to perform mechanical changes at Plant No. 2. The following summarizes the minor changes and justifications. A. Housekeeping Pads for Sample Pumps Five new concrete sample pumps pads were built at the Effluent Junction Box, Ocean Outfall Booster Station (two locations), Plant Water Diversion Box, and Surge Tower #2. General housekeeping pads are required to protect the sampling pumps from damage due to rainwater, spills, hosedown and were not included in the contract plans and specifications. B. Plant No. 2 Sodium Bisulfite Station Suction Header Modifications The Contractor was directed to install 3 CPVC (3-inch) isolation valves on the Sodium Bisulfite Station suction header. Staff recommended the isolation valves for each of the three tanks to provide flexibility and facilitate future operations and maintenance activities. C. Plant No. 2 Sodium Bisulfite Station Air Pipe Material Substitution The Contractor was directed to install 80 feet of 1-inch Stainless Steel Pipe in the Containment Structure located at the Sodium Bisulfite Station, in lieu of the 1-inch Black Iron Pipe specified per the Contract Documents. Staff determined that this material substitution will provide a more corrosion resistant pipe thus prolonging the service life. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account in accordance with Division 1, Section 43.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 27, and J.F. Shea's letter dated October 23, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $2,304.00 O Calendar Days $31,556.00 0 Calendar Days ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Page6of 7 Date: December 17. 2003 Job: Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Job No. J-87 Consultant: Black & Veatch The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 0-day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses, or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: Original Contract Time: Original Completion Date: Time Extension this C.O.: Total Contract Time Extension: Revised Contract Time: Revised Final Completion Due Date: Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Actual Final Completion Date: February 24, 2003 250 Calendar Days October 31, 2003 o Calendar Days 20 Calendar Days 270 Calendar Days November 20, 2003 0 Calendar Days Not Applicable Original Contract Price Prev. Authorized Changes This Change (Add) (Dedl:JGt) Amended Contract Price $4.298,247 $ (98,061) $ 31,556 $4.231.742 d ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P .0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Page 7 of 7 Date: December 17. 2003 Job: Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Job No. J-87 Consultant: Black & Veatch Board Authorization Date: December 17, 2003 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Matt Smith, P.E. PMO Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering Accepted by: J.F. SHEA CORPORATION Contractor EDMS 003757488 Date Date Date ' -E DMS 003757631 J ob No. J-87 C h ange O rder N o. 2 Dece mbe r 2003 Items 4 , 6 , 7 & 8 located throughout Plant 2 .. , . '·' ' .. . ·· ...-:,.;\·~~ .. ~.' · .. EDMS 003757632 ·~ • ~j. +': -.. --;.1.-- ···-"'· -~ _·,,~I .. ; ... ' ? .... . , • .. :., _,,,, r ; .. Job No . J-87 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Dece mber, 2003 ~ ' ·~·-.-:?.>~~-~UI:.:-~---------~~----~---..__...-. Item -5 Addition of Neoprene Tank Pads ~DMS0~:?5763~ Item 4 -Overhead Pipe Racks Item 8 -Additional Changes at Pit 2 C hemical Fe ed Facilities I.. PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir . 12/04/03 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin , Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Senior Engineer PDC03-93 SUBJECT: LONG RANGE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN , JOB NO. J-40-7 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 13(d) Receive and file Final Long Range Biosolids Management Plan , Job No. J-40-7 , dated November 2003, prepared by CH2M Hill , Inc. SUMMARY • In September 2002, the Board of Directors authorized CH2MHill , Inc. to study the long range biosol ids management options for the Orange County Sanitation District (District). • Since 1999, land application options for biosolids in California and the surrounding states have become tenuous. Many of the District's present management options are anticipated to be no longer viable due to new local ordinances in two to five years; therefore , the scope of the study was to develop a plan for managing District's biosolids for the next 10 to 15 years. • The Long Range Biosolids Management Plan (Plan) includes an analysis of potent ial technologies and markets for biosolids de ri ved products , an analysis of treatment plant processes to reduce overall biosolids handling and treatment costs , and a long range implementation strategy. • Over the past five months, District staff presented each major piece of the plan to the Operations , Maintenance , and Technical Services (OMTS) and Planning , Design , and Construction (PDC) Committees. • The following will be implemented based on the Plan 's recommendations: 1 . Employ new in-plant technologies to reduce the volume of Biosolids handled by the District's two treatment plants, as follows: • Replace existing belt filter press dewatering equipment with centrifuges . • Replace existing secondary sludge dissolved air flotation thickening equipment with gravity belts . • Install primary sludge thickening equipment. G:lwp.dtalagenda\Board Agenda Aeports\2003 Board Agenda Aeports\1203\ltem 13(d).Blosollds.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1 2 . Move to the production of Class A biosolids products using established and reliable technologies. 3 . Establish and maintain failsafe backup options for 100% of the biosolids produced at OCSD . 4 . Work with member agencies and local stakeholders to develop in-county production facilities and markets. 5 . Moving into the following markets using vendor contracts for providing processing facilities, product distribution , and marketing : kets : • Energy and fuel production • Heat dried granular products • Heat drying with soil reclamation • Compost • Organo-mineral fertilizers • In order to quickly transition from Class B to Class A biosolids production before the Class B market collapses, requests for proposals (RFP ) are being released for biosolids management. These RFP 's are to provide services and facilities to participate in the markets recommended in the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan . • These proposals will be reviewed by District staff and its consultants . The recommended vendor contract(s) will be brought back to the Board of Directors for final approval in April 2004. • During on this transition , the costs to beneficially reuse biosolids are expected to increase by about $3 million per year starting in FY 06-07; the current FY03-04 budget for biosolids management was $9 million. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS 1. November 2003 OMTS/PDC: Information only item regarding existing policies and potential future reuse costs outlined in the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan. 2 . October 2003 OMTS/PDC : Information only item regarding the various in-plant treatment optimization options evaluated in the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan . 3 . September 2003 OMTS/PDC: Information only item regarding the biosolids product markets and product technologies . 4. August 2003 Board : Approve Addendum No .2 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill , Inc. for an additional amount of $785 ,079 .78 . G:\wp .dtalagenda\Bonrd Agenda Repons\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\llem 13(d).Biosolids.doc Revi sed: 06/0<l/03 Page 2 • 5. July 2003 Board: Receive and file Draft Long Range Biosolids Master Plan, Job No. J-40-7, dated June 2003, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. 6. September 2002 Board: (1) Approve a budget amendment of $100,913; and (2) Approve Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $490,913. 7. February 2002 Board: (1) Approve a budget amendment of $157,942.17; and (2) Approve Addendum No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement for an additional amount of $157,942.17. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No new authorization of expenditures is being requested at this time. BUDGET IMPACT ~ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section a, Page 124) D This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) No new authorization of expenditures is being requested at this time. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Executive Summary from the Long Term Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, dated November 2003, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. is attached for additional information. Also, a presentation will be given at the meeting. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None required at this time. CEQA documentation will be developed as part of the implementation of any selected biosolids management option, as necessary. ATTACHMENTS Executive Summary from the Long Range Biosolids Master Plan, Job No. J-40-7, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. JB:sa G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\OMTS\OMTS J-40-7 -120303.doc G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 13(d).Biosolids.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page3 ' Final Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan Executive Summary The Orange County Sanitation District (the District) currently produces approximately 650 wet tons of digested and dewatered Class B biosolids per day. By the year 2020, biosolids production is projected to increase by about 30 percent. The District relies on land application of its Class B biosolids in Kem and Kings Counties in California, and Class B biosolids land application at the Fort Mojave Indian Reservation in California, Nevada, and Arizona. Moreover, the District is committed to environmentally sound biosolids management practices that meet the stringent federal, state, and local regulatory requirements. Counties throughout California and Arizona have developed, or are in the process of developing, ordinances that severely restrict or ban the land application of Class B biosolids. Recently Kem and Kings Counties banned land application of Oass B biosolids. It has become clear that future requirements for managing biosolids will be more restrictive and costs will increase as current options are eliminated. The dynamic regulatory issues, land application ordinances and bans, and public perception challenges prompted the District to develop this Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. The goal was to develop a sustainable, reliable, and economical program for long-range biosolids management. This Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan includes four major elements: 1. Identify long-term potential Southern California Class A biosolids products and product markets. 2. Identify the onsite and offsite facility options for manufacturing marketable products while optimizing the use of the District's facilities necessary in treating wastewater. 3. Develop a flexible implementation plan for positioning the District to be able participate . in multiple markets. 4. Continue to beneficially reuse biosolids and maintain conformance with the National Biosolids Partnership (NBP) Code of Good Practice. Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan Development There is a wide range of products that can be developed from biosolids. The strategy for the District will be to focus its resources on developing an economical product for targeted sustainable markets. To develop and select the most sustainable biosolids management options, the consultant team utilized a business-model assessment. First, the long-term sustainable biosolids product markets were identified. Next, the steps necessary to manufacture suitable biosolids-based products for these markets were evaluated. The relationship between the top five long-term sustainable biosolids markets and products that can be generated for these markets is summarized as follows: • Horticulture -Blending and Bagging for Retail Outlets: Compost, dry pellets and granules, and organo-mineral fertilizer products. W052003003SCO/LW1232 ES1 .DOC/031500006 FINAL LONG-RANGE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PlAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Horticulture -Ornamental and Nurseries: Compost, dry pellets and granules, and organo-mineral fertilizer products. • Horticulture -District Member Cities and Agencies: Compost, dry pellets and granules, and organo-mineral fertilizer products on municipal lands. • Direct Energy Production: Class B biosolids cake and dry pellets. • Silviculture -Shade Tree Programs: Compost or dry pellets and granules, and organo- mineral fertilizer products. Each market consumes several biosolids-based products, and most products can have multiple markets. For example, all five markets accept the dry pellets and granules. Next, the consultant team developed an economic model and performed an assessment of the 22 most important critical implementation factors, including potential odors, traffic impacts, public perception, product sustainability, and ease of implementation/ siting. These two parallel activities allowed for the true cost of each option to be assessed and compared. Based on this evaluation, the most viable biosolids product manufacturing processes are: 1. Composting 2. Heat drying 3. Energy recovery 4. Organo-mineral fertilizer manufacturing 5. Heat drying with soil This evaluation also determined that diversification of products, product markets, and marketing contracts, as well as the availability of failsafe backup options, are critical elements to protect the District from the effects of weakening markets and failed contracts. These elements are critical because each product market has associated weaknesses, and it will likely take time to develop a product for a new market, contracts with a company within that market, or both. Finally, the District needs to maintain its current land application capacity and options, including the Class A biosolids alkaline stabilization process at its farm in Kings County and other land application sites, for as long as it is feasible and economically sound, while this long-range plan is implemented. Recommendations and Costs The biosolids management program is designed to provide flexibility and allow the District to diversify products and manufacturing through participation in both District-owned and merchant facilities. The consultant team recommends diversification using the following approach, primarily to reduce financial risk: 1. Maintain at least three different product manufacturing options at any given time. 2. Optimize capital and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs at the District treabnent plants as part of implementation of the long-range plan. 3. Limit maximum participation for any market to one-half of the total biosolids production. 4. Limit biosolids management contracts to a maximum of one-third of total biosolids production per merchant facility, and one-half per contractor (for contractors with multiple product manufacturing facilities). 5. Maximum capacity for each District-owned product manufacturing facility to be one-half of the total biosolids production. 6. Explore funding options for in-county facilities (private capital, District capital, or both). W052003003SCO/LW1232 ES1.DOC/031500006A 2 FINAL , ( LONG-RANGE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PlAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7. Allocate up to 10 percent of biosolids for participation in emerging markets. 8. Pursue Orange County based product manufacturing facilities and maximize the use of horticultural products within the District service area by member agencies and through developing public-private partnerships. 9. Maintain capacity and options at the District's Central Valley Ranch. 10. Pursue failsafe backup options (landfilling, alternative daily cover [ADC] for landfills, and dedicated landfilling) to acquire a 100 percent contingency capacity. Table ES-1 presents a summary of the Plant Nos. 1 and 2 onsite improvements, associated capital costs, and the year capacity is needed. With the current biosolids processes, Plant No. 1 dissolved air flotation thickener (DAFT) capacity will be reached in year 2013, digestion capacity will be reached in year 2013, and dewatering capacity will be reached in year 2007. With implementation of the proposed primary and WAS thickening improvements, the need for additional dewatering and digestion capacity will be postponed to year 2013 and beyond year 2020, respectively. For Plant No. 2, similarly, with the addition of new primary sludge and WAS thickening improvements, the existing digestion and dewatering capacity will be adequate through the year 2020 and beyond. TABLEES·1 Plants 1 and 2 -Onsite Process Improvements and Expansion Onslte Biosolids Processing Facilities Plant 1 Onsite Biosolids Processing Facilities Primary Sludge Thickening (Centrifuge) WAS Thickening (GBT or Centrifuge) Digester Pretreatment (Ultrasound) Dewatering (Centrifuge) Plant 2 Onslte Biosolids Processing Facilities Digester Pretreatment (Ultrasound) Dewatering (Centrifuge) Notes: Year Capacity Needed 2013 2007 Note2 2013 Note2 Note3 Capital Cost, Million $1 17.4 10.7 10.1 55.6 6.5 39.7 1The capital costs are for onsite process improvements only. The upgrade of existing digestion facilities will be as planned in the capital improvement program (CIP) and is not included here. 2The District is currently evaluating project delivery options for implementing ultrasound. 3Plant No. 2 has adequate dewatering capacity through the year 2020. However, centrifuge dewatering will result in reduction of biosolids cake volume and reuse costs and should be considered for implementation. GBT = gravity belt thickener To optimize facilities sizing, pilot testing of thickening (primary sludge, WAS, and combined sludge) and dewatering may be conducted. For digesters, the impact of an increase in digester feed solids (due to improved thickening) will be evaluated on the digester mixing systems, heat exchangers, and ammonia concentration in the digesters and dewatering recycles. Because additional dewatering is needed at Plant No. 1 and similar centrifuge equipment is used for the thickening and dewatering, full-scale centrifuges will be considered for testing. Upon completion of the thickening test, the centrifuges will be relocated to the Plant No. 1 dewatering building to provide the needed capacity and allow for evaluating the impact of the dryer biosolids cake on the cake pumping system and product manufacturing technologies. Testing for product manufacturing technologies will be conducted at the District's Central Valley Ranch and/ or existing merchant facilities that use the processes W052003003SCO/LW1232 ES1.DOC/031500006A 3 FINAL LONG-RANGE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY !· under consideration. Using full-size equipment for thickening and dewatering will also provide sufficient biosolids for testing prod net-manufacturing technologies. It is anticipated that land application markets will continue to become less reliable due to public perception and political issues and may not be available in 3 to 5 years. The Biosolids Management Program Implementation Plan, therefore, focuses on more reliable Orange County and Southern California reuse markets through developing high-value products. As implementation of District-owned in-county composting or heat-drying facilities could take 8 years or longer, the program includes activities to immediately begin obtaining new merchant facility contracts that would enable the District to participate in more stable biosolids reuse markets. The merchant facilities will bridge the gap between the phase-out of existing reuse contracts and the startup of future District-owned facilities. Core elements of the implementation program include: • Participate in sustainable reuse markets through manufacturing higher-value products such as compost, dry pellets and granules, organo-mineral fertilizers, and energy. • Develop in-county composting (i.e., Central-North County, Joint Composting with South Orange County Wastewater Authority [SOCW A], etc.). • Develop in-county thermal drying facilities (onsite or offsite). • Participate in merchant composting and organo-mineral product manufacturing facilities. • Pursue merchant energy production (co-combustion) to allow participation in non- cropping markets. • Explore benefits and use of emerging biosolids product manufacturing technologies such as drying with hot soil and energy fuels (i.e., char). • Maintain failsafe backup reuse capacity for land application of chemically stabilized biosolids (Tule Ranch) and through reuse ofbiosolids products as ADC at landfills. • Obtain failsafe backup landfill capacity for biosolids landfilling (Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department [OC IWMD], Holloway Mines, etc.) Although the program has identified the need to add new thickening facilities, the digestion facilities identified in the validated capital improvement program (CIP) were eliminated. The. capital cost of the program does not have a significant impact on the CIP resource allocation until Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 /2008. The major impacts occur when construction of District- owned heat-drying and/ or composting facilities is projected to be initiated, if these facilities are financed by the District. Merchant facilities are typically funded through management contract tipping fees. The District should also explore contract terms that provide funding for in-county facilities through private capital, District capital, or both. In the past 3 years, the tipping fees for biosolids land application have risen from $25 per wet ton (pwt) to $35 pwt, representing an increase of 40 percent. In the interim period, the tipping fee is expected to increase to $45 to $50 for Class A biosolids land application. The current biosolids cake solids concentration is in the range of 20 to 22 percent, resulting in a cost of $200 to $250 per dry ton (pdt) for Class A biosolids land application. The cost for manufacturing high-value products for sustainable markets is estimated at $50 to $70 pwt. With the implementation of the proposed onsite improvements, the cake solids concentration is expected to be in the range of 26 to 28 percent, resulting in a cost of $195 to $270 pdt for high-value products. This modest cost increase provides the District with diverse and reliable product markets and product manufacturing options, reduces financial risks, improves program reliability, and minimizes potential for future cost escalations. W052003003SCOILW1232 ES1.DOCI03150000SA 4 FINAL • I l, PDC COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange Coun ty Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin , Director of Engineering Originator: Ann Tobin , Project Manager Meeting Date 12/04/03 Item Number PDC03-95 SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTALFULLSECONDARYTREATMENTCEQA DOCUMENTATION , JOB NO . J-40-10 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION To Bel. of Dir. 12/17/03 Item Number 13(e) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates providing for professional s ervices for Supplemental Full Sec ondary Tre atment CEQA Documentation , Job No . J-40-10 , for an amount not to e xceed $154,992. SUMMARY • This project provides for supplemental California Environmenta l Quality Act (CEQA) documentation as an update to th e Orange County Sanitation Distri ct's (District) 1999 Strategic Plan Program En v ironmental Impact Report (PEIR ). Since the certification of the PEIR , new projects have been added to the District's Capital Improvement Program that require env ironmental revie w under the CEQA, most notably projects associated with the District's decision to implement full secondary treatment standards . • The proposed Professional Service s Agreement (PSA) includes prof essional services to provide environmental studies required by CEQA for wastewate r treatment plant projects currentl y planned for construction between 2005 and 2015 . • Staff evaluated proposal s received from two firms , and recommends the PSA be awarded to ESA in the a mount not to ex ceed $154,992 . PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The proposed PSA is a new co ntract. The only prior Board act ions we re the approval of the Capital Improvement Plan (GIP) Budget at the June 25 , 2003 Board meeting . PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The PSA amount and budget neces sa ry for the project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table . An authorization of $154 ,922 for professional service s is being requested . G:\wp.d1alagenda\Board Agenda Re porls\2003 Bo ard Agenda Reporls\1203\llem 13(e).Environmen1al Services Assoc ia1es.doc Revised: 06/04 /03 Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ~ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, page 122) D This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background Subsequent to the adoption of the 1999 PE IR , the District committed to upgrade the level of wastewater treatment to full secondary standards at both plants. New improvements and rehabilitation are planned to support this commitment. Revisions to the full secondary treatment projects since the 1999 PEIR require further public disclosure through the CEQA process. Staff recommends a thorough but expedited supplemental CEQA documentation to provide environmental clearance for projects associated with plant upgrades for full secondary treatment. Services to be provided under the proposed PSA include but are not limited to participation in the public involvement process, attendance and participation at meetings and public hearings, preparation of mailing lists , preparation of draft and final CEQA documents, preparation of a Mitigation Monitoring Program , and all necessary support services, exclusive of printing publicly distributed documents, necessary for comp letion, certification and filing of CEQA documents. Consultant Evaluation and Selection Process The District solicited proposals from five firms: Environmental Science Associates (ESA); Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH); HOR Engineering Inc.; Jones & Stokes and Michael Brandman Associates. Proposals were received from ESA and MWH in association with K.P Lindstrom, Inc . The submitted proposals were evaluated by five staff members. Based on the staff evaluation , ranking , and the proposed level of effort, Staff recommends the approval of a PSA with ESA, as summarized in the attached Staff Evaluation Summary. ALTERNATIVES Award the PSA to the other consu ltant team. Staff does not recommend this because of th e difference in proposed level of effort. G :\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Rep ons\2003 Board Agenda Repons\1203\ltem 13(e).Environmental Services Associates.d oc Revised: 06104/03 Pa g e 2 , CEQA FINDINGS The wastewater treatment plant projects to be addressed under J-40-1 O have not been fully addressed in the District's 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR and require additional CEQA review. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals AT:sa G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\J-40-10 PSA Award AR PDC 120403.doc G:\wp.d1a\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 13(e).Environmental Services Associates.doc Revised: 06104103 Page 3 PROJEcr/PHASE Ph..,so 1 · Proiecl Oevelooment P~se 2 • Pretimin:uv OesKJn Ph.1.se J • Oestan Phase 4 • CoruttructlOn Phose 5 • Commisslonino Phl\se 6. Clos&-Ou1 Phaoe 7 • ContlnQencv PROJECT TOTAL PROJECT 1i ET Desi n PSA ConsirucHon Contract AT:sa EOMS 0037!16140 BUDGET INFORMATIO N TABLE S UPPLEMENTAL FULL SECONDAR Y TREATMENT CEOA DOCUMENTATION J -40-10 ORIGHIAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THI S PROPOSED BUDGET AUTHORIZED PROJECT INCREASE REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL BUDGET BU DGET /DEC REASE B\JOGET DATE REOU EST AUTH ORIZATION $ 62.000 $ 62000 s 62000 $ 62.000 s 62.000 s 363000 s 363.000 s 363000 $ 154.992 s 154.992 s 42$ 000 s 425.000 $ 425.000 s 62000 $ 154.992 s 216.992 1 1 EST'lf.IATED , EXPENDITURE TO DATE $ 1.114 s 1.114 s 425000 s 425.000 62000 s 154.992 s 218.992 s l.11.J 301 ,000 s 301.000 154.992 $ 154,992 ' Professional Services Agreement Status Report SUPPLEMENTAL FULL SECONDARY TREATMENT CEQA DOCUMENTATION Job No. J-40-10 Total Project Budget: $425,000 Consultant: Environmental Science Associates (ESA) Start Date of Project: July 1, 2003 Date Amendment Description Pending Original PSA Professional Services for CEQA Documentation AT:sa EDMS 003758138 EDMS Cost $154,992 c::; Accumulated Costs $154,992 SUPPLEMENTAL FULL SECONDARY TREATMENT CEQA DOCUMENTATION J-40-10 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Professional Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Environmental Science Associates (ESA) • Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH) • HOR Engineering Inc. • Jones & Stokes • Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) HDR Engineering Inc., Jones & Stokes, and Michael Brandman Associates declined to submit a proposal. MWH partnered with K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. for this project. As a result, there were two responsive proposals received on October 27, 2003. Proposals were reviewed in-house by a review panel from October 27, 2003 to October 30, 2003. The review panel consisted of five members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in six weighted categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work (Weight 2) - Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work (Weight 2) -Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience (Weight 2) -Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it. relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications (Weight 3) -A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants (Weight 1) -Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule (Weight 2) -Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. The two proposals were evaluated on October 30, 2003. After reviewing and comparing the proposals, the two consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results for the two firms: 1 . ESA 504 Points 2. MWH I K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. 478 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: ESA: Strong proposal. The firm has relevant experience and an excellent understanding of CEQA work and the OCSD Strategic Plan Program EIR. The proposed level of effort and project approach are very good. MWH/K.P. Lindstrom: Strong proposal. MWH has relevant experience and excellent understanding of CEQA and wastewater treatment. K. P. Lindstrom has substantial experience with OCSD and a firm understanding of the OCSD Strategic Plan. The project approach is good but the proposed level of effort appears to have been over estimated. TABLE 1.0 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm ESA MWH/ K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. Reviewer A 98 96 Reviewer B 105 87 Reviewer C 97 99 Reviewer D 104 103 Reviewer E 100 93 Total Score 504 478 (600 Points Maximum) Average Score 101 96 (120 Points Maximum) Workforce Estimate 1401 2600 (Man-hours) 100% Project Completion 48 47 Proposed (Weeks) Proposed Not to Exceed Fee $151, 135 $304,654 Following grading of proposals and consideration of fees, staff contacted ESA to address some staffing and schedule concerns. ESA made minor revisions to the proposed labor effort to provide better continuity with the 1999 Strategic Plan Program El R. ESA also revised the schedule to include intermediate steps. The fee proposal associated with the revised labor effort is $154,992. The revised project completion is 54 weeks. Based on review of the submitted proposals and subsequent communication with ESA, staff recommends awarding a PSA to ESA for Supplemental Full Secondary Treatment CEQA Documentation, J-40-10 for a total fee not to exceed $154,992. AT:sa EDMS 003757722 PDC COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin , Director of Engineering Originator: Alberto Acevedo, Project Manager Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 12/04/03 12/17/03 Item Number Item Num ber PDC0 3-96 13 (f) SUBJECT: NEWPORT TRUNK SEWER AND FORCE MAINS , BIDER POINT PUMP STATION TO COAST TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO . 5-58 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation for engineering services for design of Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains, Bitter Point Pump Station to Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-58 , for an amount not to exceed $1 ,018 ,907. SUMMARY • This project is the result of the need to replace the existing lines, the District's plan to replace Plant No. 2 Headworks Facilities and the need to provide a new point of connection to discharge and treat the wastewater from the cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa at Plant No. 2. The existing system has failed in several occasions in the last three years and requires a lot of attention from the Operations and Maintenance Department. • The professional Services Agreement (PSA) includes the following : 1. Preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) to include the analysis of the alignment alternatives. 2 . Final design of the recommended alignment. 3 . California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Pe rmit Support Services . 4. Preparation of Construction Bid Documents. • Staff evaluated the proposals rece ived from four engineering firms and recommended the PSA be awarded to Black & Veatch Corporation in an amount no t to exceed $1 ,018 ,90 7. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The Budget for this project was approved by the Board of Directors as part of the Capital Improvement Program budget on June 25, 2003. G:l wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Repons\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\llem 13(1).Black&Veatch.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed PSA is a new contract. The PSA amount and budget necessary for the project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table . An authorization of $1,018 ,907 for Professional Engineering Services is being requested . BUDGET IMPACT [8] This item has been budgeted. (Line item : FY 2003 -04, Section 8 -Page 25 , Cap ital Improve m ent Program, Collecti on Facilities, PCH FM Bitter Pt PS to Coast Trunk at Brookhurst & PCH ) D This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background This project was conceived as an alternative to the rehabilitation of the existing force mains, siphons, and gravity pipeline identified as the Newport Beach Trunk Sewer System , to convey wastewater flows from the cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa into the new Headworks Facilities at Plant No. 2 . To minimize the number of sewer connections into the new Headworks Facilities , the proposed Trunk Sewer System will tie into the existing Coast Trunk Sewer, either inside the plant or outside at the intersection of Brookhurst and Pacific Coast Highway. This project was not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR ) and consequently the District's Environmental Consultant is preparing a Supplemental En v ironmental Impact Report (SEIR). Consultant Evaluation and Selection Process The District solicited proposals from six consulting firms: Black & Veatch Corporation ; Boyle Engineering Corporation ; Lee & Ro , Inc.; Malcolm Pirnie ; PBS&J; and RBF Consulting, In c. Requests for Proposals (RFPs) were sent to these firms based on their experience with the design of force mains and gravity sewers along coastal waters and crossing of rivers and channels . Proposals were received from four of the firms , PBS&J elected not to participate at this time and submitted a letter to decline, RBF Consulting , Inc. elected to join the Malcolm Pirnie team. All firms attended the mandatory pre- proposal meeting. The submitted proposals were distributed to the Staff Evaluation Team for ranking . Based on the Staff Evaluation Team 's ranking , Black & Veatch Corporation had the highest ranking as indicated on the attached Proposal Evaluation Report. G:lwp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Repons\2003 Board Agenda Reports\ 1203\ltem 13(1).Black& Veatc h.doc Revised : 06/04/03 Page 2 ... • > ALTERNATIVES Operate and continue to repair and rehabilitate existing facilities. Staff does not recommend this option because it will not meet the existing goal of reducing Operations and Maintenance requirements, elimination of potential nuisance odors, and minimizing the risk of potential spills. CEQA FINDINGS This project was not included in the District's 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report that was certified on October 27, 1999. A SEIR is being prepared for the implementation of the project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals AAC:jo:lc G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 13(f).Black&Veatch.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 3 PROJECT/PHASE PIT!IOar10.V~ Prf!tlmln.,rv Oesicn "'"'"' Con~rudion Ccmmlulonlno CIO<"A-Ou! Conll.......,.,.., PROJECT TOTAL PROJECT NET EOMS 003757618 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE NEWPORT TRUNK SEWER AND FORCE MAINS, BIITER POINT PUMP STATION TO COAST TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT NO. 5-58 OAIGIUAL CVRRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTIMATED AUTHORIZED PROJECT 8UOCET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORtzATIOrl PROPOSED TOTAL EXPENDITURE INCREASE AUTHORlZATIOU OUDQET 8UDQET IOECREASE 8UDGET DATif REOUEST TO DATE s 100000 s 100 000 s 100000 s 100 000 s 100000 s BA 498 $ :>00000 $ :>00000 s 260000 $ 174 500 s A5.500 $ 260.000 s . .... s I 580000 s 1.560.000 s 1 580000 s 814 800 $ "'3407 $ 1548 207 s 10053000 s 10053 000 s 10053000 s s s 174 000 s 174 000 $ 174 000 s s 48.665 s 46.665 $ 46,665 $ $ s 1 733,000 s 1 733,000 s I 733000 s s s 13926665 s 13.926 665 s s 13926 665 s 8811.300 s 1.019.907 $ 1,908,207 s 9 1,447 11 13.926 665 $ 13.926,665 $ -$ 13926665 889.300 $ 10115.907 s 1.908 207 s 91.44 7 1030700 , 030 700 1019907 $ 1.01UI07 . s . s • > ESTIMATED EXPENDED TO DA~) .... 3• • ... ... s .. •.. Professional Services Agreement Status Report NEWPORT TRUNK SEWER AND FORCE MAINS, BITTER POINT PUMP STATION TO COAST TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-58 Total Project Budget: $13,976,665 Consultant: Black & Veatch Corporation Start Date of Project: January 5, 2004 Date Pending EDMS:03758391 Revised 05/14/98 Amendment Original PSA Description Design engineering services for Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains, Bitter Point Pump Station to Coast Trunk Sewer. Cost Accumulated Costs $1,018,907 $1,018,907 11/10/03 ..-.'· NEWPORT TRUNK SEWER AND FORCE MAINS, BITTER POINT PUMP STATION TO COAST TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT NO. 5 -58 Proposal Evaluation Report Request for Proposals (RFP's) were sent on September 8, 2003 to the following consulting firms: • Black & Veatch Corporation • Boyle Engineering corporation • Lee & Ro, Inc. • Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. • PBS&J • RBF Consulting, Inc. The six firms attended the mandatory pre-proposal meeting scheduled on September 23, 2003. PBS&J elected not to participate and submitted a letter to decline submittal of a proposal. RBF Consulting, Inc. elected to join the Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Team. As a result, there were four responsive proposals received on October 13, 2003. Each member of an in-house review panel individually ranked the proposals. The review panel consisted of six members. Each proposal was graded from 1to10 (10 being best) in six weighted categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work (Weight 10) - Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work (Weight 8) -Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Staff Qualifications (Weight 8) -A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 4. Applicable Related Project Experience (Weight 6)-Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants (Weight 5) -Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule (Weight 3) -Rates the consultant's proposed schedule as to whether it meets the District's needs and whether the consultant can meet the schedule. This also rates whether the consultant provided an accelerated schedule and could the consultant meet it. EDMS:003757686 1of4 12/10/2003 i t The initial written proposal rankings were compiled on October 20, 2003. A meeting was then held the next day (October 21, 2003) to discuss the reasons and background for individual rankings. Based on these discussions, the Evaluation Team agreed to re- examine their rankings and submit updated evaluation forms. These were compiled and presented to the Evaluation Team on October 23, 2003; Table 1 presents the results of the Team evaluation of the proposals submitted. The top two ranked firms were ranked as follows: 1. Black & Veatch, Corporation 2. Boyle Engineering Corporation 2034 Points 1941 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the top ranked consultant: BLACK & VEATCH Black & Veatch Corporation (B&V), was ranked number 1 by four of the six review team members and had the highest-ranked technical proposal based on meeting the Orange County Sanitation District's requirements for understanding of the Scope of Work, project approach, management techniques, applicable project experience, team organization and use of sub-consultants. They also presented several issues in the project approach and proposed solutions to help in delivering a successful project. B& V's quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) as well as their project management procedures were excellent. The proposed Project Manger's qualifications are excellent. The staff has the best similar and most recent project experience. The proposed project team, including sub-consultants, is well organized based on specialties and division of work. In addition to these items, the following attributes formed the basis for B& V's high ranking: 1 . Good innovative ideas and construction sequencing 2. Significant acceleration of the design schedule 3. PM has significant experience with pipeline and force main projects 4. Performed well on Effluent Pump Station Annex project using District guidelines Fee Proposals After the final ranking of the technical proposals, the sealed fee proposals submitted by all the firms were opened. The total fee received from the consultants arranged in the order of the final technical ranking was: Black & Veatch Boyle Lee & Ro Malcolm Pirnie $ 1,386, 198.00 $ 838,415.00 $ 1,355,209.00 $ 1,232,650.00 After viewing the submitted fee proposals, it was clear to the Management team that further analysis was required to justify the selection of B & V since the design firm selected solely on technical merit submitted the highest cost, whereas, the second highest rated firm came in with a cost that was almost 40% lower or approximately EDMS:003757686 2 of4 12/10/2003 $548,000.00 less. In addition, the other two firms submitted costs in the same range as the highest technically ranked firm. In order to try to bring some rationale to the submitted costs, a detailed review and analysis of the level of effort and fee proposals was performed. Based on this evaluation, B&V was found to have the appropriate amount of man-hours for Phases 2 & 3 (Design Work) based on the "Rule of Thumb" of man-hours per drawing for production of pipeline projects, Boyle was close to 1,600 man-hours or 42% less thank B & V. The other two consulting firms had total man-hours in the same range as B&V. It was further determined that with the exception of Boyle, the three other consultants provided costs within the same range as B&V. If viewed on a purely technical level, this could lead to a conclusion that Boyle has underestimated or did not fully understood the scope of work as provided by the District and detailed in the Request for Proposal (RFP). From this evaluation, the Management team made two decisions: 1. To commence negotiations with B& V to explore the possibility to reduce the fee by 5-10%. 2. To only negotiate the Design work (Phases 2 and 3) since the support activities for construction, commissioning, and close-out were sufficiently far into future that these should be negotiated when those Phases were imminent. A negotiation meeting took place immediately and B& V reduced their fee by approximately 14.06% or slightly more than $194,000. This reduction in fee was accomplished without any reduction in the original scope of work. Table 2 summarizes the final level of effort and fee data from the consultants including the negotiated reduced fee from B&V. Based on the data provided above plus the highest technical ranking, Staff recommends that B& V be awarded the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains, Bitter Point Pump Station to Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-58, for a total design fee not to exceed $1,018,907. EDMS:003757686 3 of4 12110/2003 ' -. TABLE 1 NEWPORT TRUNK SEWER AND FORCEMAINS, BITTER POINT PUMP STATION TO COAST TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT 5 -58 FIRM B&V BOYLE LEE & RO MPI Reviewer A 273 262 260 244 Reviewer B 329 289 292 319 Reviewer C 316 297 321 304 Reviewer D 372 338 301 280 Reviewer E 384 368 340 346 Reviewer F 360 387 332 287 TOTAL SCORE 2034 1941 1846 1780 AVERAGE SCORE 339 323 308 297 TECHNICAL 1 2 3 4 RANKING TABLE 2 NEWPORT TRUNK SEWER AND FORCEMAINS, BITTER POINT PUMP STATION TO COAST TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT 5 -58 Black & Boyle Lee& Ro MPI Veatch Engineers Phase 2 + 3 Hours 5424 3679 6473 5840 Phase 2 + 3 Costs,$ 1,018,907 677,644 1,131,373 1,099,500 Cost per hr, for Ph 2 + 3, $/hr 187.85 184.19 174.78 188.27 Information Only -Not part of PSA Total Hours 6,472 4829 7891 6872 Total Cost, $ 1,191,338 838,415 1,355,209 1,232,650 Total Cost per hr, $/hr 184.08 173.62 171.74 179.37 Overhead Rate,% 115.3 105.0 99.0 93.0 EDMS:003757686 4 of4 12110/2003 PDC COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin , Director of Engineering Originator: Julian Sabri, Engineer Meeting Date 12/04/0 3 I tem Number PDC03-97 To Bd. of Dir. 12/17/03 I tem Number 13 (a ) SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PARSONS ENG INEER ING SCIENCE , INC. FOR AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN , PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 , JOB. NO. J-35-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan , Plant Nos. 1 and 2 , Job No. J-35-2 , providing for construction support services for an additional amount of $539,610, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3 ,951 ,021. SUMMARY Background • This project implements a study of Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to comply with the National Electrical Code (NEC) by utilizing National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 820 Standard. The work includes modification of ventilation systems to meet the code requirements , replacement or modification of electrical systems , installation of a fire alarm system in the tunnels, and replacement/relocation of digester and natural gas piping. • Four addenda to the Consultant's Professional Services Agreement have been issued over the design phase of this project. These addenda reflected an increased scope of design due to added process control and instrumentation upgrades. One addendum was for services during construction . • The plans and specifications were prepared by Parsons Engineering Science, Inc., and the contract was awarded to J.F. Shea Construction , Inc. on June 26 , 2002. • The fees proposed for construction support services are estimates prepared by Parsons Engineering Science , Inc. and District staff and are based on experience with other projects of this size. All work performed and billed will be on an as requested basis by District staff to support the project. Revised: 10/3 1/2003 Page 1 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS • In June 2002, the Board of Directo rs awarded the construction contra ct to J . F. Shea Construction , Inc. • Please refer to attached Professional Services Agreement Status Report for more details related to the engineering services provided by Parsons Engineering Science , Inc. • In addition , please refer to attached Change Order Status Report for more details related to the construction services provided by J. F. Shea Construction , Inc . PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total project budget for this project is $21 ,283,000 . Authorization of an additional $539 ,610 is being requested for the Consultant Professional Services Agreement, increasing the total authorization to $3 ,951 ,021 . An additional $86 ,340 is being requested to cover the cost of District Staff. The attached Budget Information Table reflects the total of $625 ,950 ($539 ,61 O Consultant cost plus $86 ,340 District Staff cost) transferred from Phase-7 (Contingency) to Phase-4 (Construction) to cover the additional funds required for this Addendum No. 5. BUDGET IMPACT 18] This item has been budgeted . (Line item: Section 8 -Page 140) D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted . D Not applicable (information item) The overall Budget is not being increased . Please see the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The Orange County Sanitation District's (District) action plan to comply with NFPA 820 , Standard for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities , resulted in the release of the initial Area Classification Study for both Plants . The preliminary engineering for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan , for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 , Job No. J-35 , was completed in August 1999 by Brown and Caldwell. The report provided the basis for an implementation plan to make modifications to ex isting facilities to meet NFPA 820 requirements . Revised: 10/31/2003 Page 2 Over the last 16 months, significant construction engineering efforts have been expended to coordinate with ongoing projects and to facilitate implementation of our future CIP program. This has resulted in the need for additional construction services budget. Specific additional activities include shop drawing review, Staff assistance in preparing change orders and proposals, response to contractor's requests for information, attend weekly construction review meetings, preparation of formal contract document changes and record & as-built drawings, as well as stat-up assistance. The total cost for the above items is$ 617,610 including expenses and is based on the District providing field offices for two staff. Staff negotiated a credit of $78,000 to the $617,610 cost reducing it to $539,610 Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 5, which provides for additional construction support services, increasing the contract amount by $539,610, for a total amount not to exceed $3,951,021. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives to the mandated Area Classification Studies and Implementation Plan are available. This project is necessary to ensure compliance with OSHA safety requirements as defined by the National Electrical Code. CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt from CEQA. ATTACHMENTS 1 . Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Change Order Status Report 4. Parsons Letter Dated October 29, 2003 JS:ba:lc G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\J-35-2_AR_Parsons_Addendum5_ 120403.doc Revised: 10/31/2003 Page3 PROJECT/PHASE Phase 1 · Proitc:t O.ve~en1 Phoae 2 . PtehmlMrv DHian ?hut 3 · Deskin Pholse 4 -Construc1ion Ph.:ln s -Commts::sotV\tlVI PMH 6 · Cbi ... Out Phaae 7 • Continoencv PROJECT TOTAL PROJECTIJET Dos nPSA BUDGET INFORMATION T ABLE AR EA C L ASS IF ICATION ST UDY IMPLE MENTATION PLAN PLA NT NOS. 1 & 2 JOB NO . J-35·2 ORIG~IAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FU HOS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AITTHORIZATIOll TOTAL EXPEJIOfTURE INCREASE BUDGET BUDGET /DECREASE BUDGET DATE REOUEST AUT!fORIZATIOH TO DATE $ 106,000 $ $ 106000 $ 106,000 $ 106,000 s 682,000 $ s 682,000 s s 682 .000 $ 682,000 s 3 745 000 $ 2305 000 $ $ 2305.000 s 2,305000 $ 2,305,000 s 2 286,508 $ 21.307,170 s 17221 000 $ 625,950 s 17 646 !ISO s 17 221.000 .$ 625.050 s 17,646.950 $ 8 826.714 $ 28\ 328 s 281 000 $ s 281 OCX> $ $ $ 70 33:! s 70000 $ $ 70000 s s $ 3 153170 s 1 406000 $ 1625 050 $ 780050 $ $ s 29 345,000 $ 21283,000 $ s 21283000 $ 20.314.000 $ 625.050 $ 20,939.050 s 11 .901.222 11 29 345.000 $ 21283 000 $ • $ 21283000 20.314 000 $ 625.950 $ 20,939.950 s 11 901 222 341 1411 34'1 411 539610 3951 021 3 4 11 4t1 s SJg,6 10 $ 3.951.021 3 019 281 14,066442 14 731 356 s 1'1731356 14.731.356 s 14,731.356 7.818 499 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Area Classification Study Implementation Plan Job No. J-35-2 Total Project Budget: $21,283,000 Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Start Date of Project: May 24, 2000 Date 5/24/00 12/20/00 1/21/02 6/26/02 11/20/2002 Pending EDMS 003757695 Revised 11 /2/03 Addendum Original PSA 1 2 3 4 5 Description Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Test Digester Value Engineering Addition one utility PLC and six remote I/O's for Plant No. 2 Construction Support Services Additional Design Effort Additional Construction Support Services Cost $2,255,680 $24,900 $24,900 $965,264 $140,667 $539,610 12/10/03 Accumulated Costs $2,255,680 $2,280,580 $2,305,480 $3,270,744 $3,411,411 $3,951,021 ITEM CONTRACT CO N0.1* CO NO. 2* CO NO. 3 CO NO. 4 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plants 1 and 2 Job No. J-35-2 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED DATE COST TO DATE· INCREASE TIME (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) 9/16/2002 $ 14,066,442. 00 $ 14,066,442.00 0.00% 1006 5/1/2003 $ 115,280.00 $ 14, 181, 722. 00 0.82% 0 9/4/2003 $ 83,195.00 $ 14,264,917.00 1.41% 0 10/22/2003 $ 269,345.00 $ 14,534,262.00 3.33% 0 11/19/2003 $ 197,094.00 $ 14,731,356.00 4.73% 0 * Approval by PDC Committee per Delegated Authority By Board Resolution 99-23 EDMS 003755559 AUTHORIZED TIME TO DATE (DAYS) 1006 1006 1006 1006 1006 PAR SD NS 100 West Walnut Street • Pasadena. California 91124 • (626) 440-2000 • Fax: (626) 440-2630 • www.parsons.com October 29, 2003 Mr. David A. Ludwin Director of Engineering Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Reference: Subject: Project J-35-2 -Purchase Order Number (PSA) 100720 Area Classification Code Compliance Request for Additional Construction Engineering Funds Dear Mr. Ludwin: Parsons is pleased to be providing the District with on-going Construction Engineering Services for the J-35-2 upgrade project. Since the beginning of construction, Parsons has provided services in excess of that originally anticipated and are now requesting additional funds. There are several factors that have caused this increase in efforts. The project is very complex given it is a retrofit project and that it extends throughout both treatment plants, affecting every process area. In addition, during construction multiple opportunities for adding value and ultimately saving the District future costs have been taken advantage of. The District's decision to implement full secondary treatment and the rescheduling of several projects has had direct impacts on the J-35-2 construction. It is cost effective to provide extra capacity~ and/or space for expansion now known to be required for future projects. These "value added" changes eliminate replacement of the new J-35-2 facilities to accommodate planned future projects. Often, a IO to 20% increase in cost of a unit at this time, eliminates a new additional unit or replacement with a larger unit having a cost of 100 to 120%. The activities that have caused the greater than originally estimated construction support effort include: • Design Modificatio11s To Reflect Field Conditions -During the design it was often impossible to field verify existing conditions without costly process shut down and interruption of operations. In these cases, the design was based on the best available information. During the construction when provisions are installed to enable shut down, actual conditions have been found to differ from the previously available information. This has resulted in the need to revise designs and to prepare field change orders for the contractor. For example7 in several instances when panels can now be opened, IO to 15 wires exist where 3 or 4 were shown on the documentation available during design. Mr. David Ludwin October 29, 2003 Page 2 • Desig11 Revisions to Accommodate On-Going Projects -There are instances where other projects were planned to provide necessary components for achieving overall NFP A code compliance in the most cost effective manner. Several of these comp1imentary projects have been delayed or re-scoped. -For example, J-35-2 is isolating a tunnel under the Gas Compressor Building at Plant 2 from the main access tunnel (barrier across opening) to prevent potential gas flow into the main tunnel system. The compressor building including access to its tunnel was to be modified under a separate project. However this other project is delayed and it is now necessary for J-35-2 to design and construct the required access in order to achieve the declassification of the main tunnel system. -Another instance is modification of digester utility panels which were to have . been modified by another project. By incorporating these changes into J-35-2 at this time, identical equipment can be incorporated which reduces main- tenance costs and facilitates operations. Alternatively, future sole source justifications with potentially greater costs would be needed to get identical equipment. These changes also result in Field Change Orders to the Construction Contractor. • Changes to Facilitate Full Secondary Treatment and other Future Projects - During the 30 months since design the District's plans for other projects have further developed. • Upgrades and/or interfaces with Pre J-35-2 Projects -There are several other projects that have been constructed and/or designed since the design of J-35-2. There are multiple instances of conflicting space requirements, changed field conditions and/or the need to modify recently installed facilities. • Standardization of Control Circuits -The District has standardized additional control circuits since the J-35-2 design which was based on Revision C of the District Design Standards. This standardization is being incorporated at this time to avoid their future replacement. The standardization reduces maintenance costs. With the improvement of the Design Standards there have also been improvements in Control Philosophies. These are being incorporated during construction inscead of having them renovated in the future at greater costs. • Addition of Space/Spares to Facilitate Future Automation -The ongoing construction offers opportunities to provide for the future automation (reduction of future labor) cost effectively. When some devices are modified for J-35-2, it is cost effective to make additions that facilitate future automation. • Standardization of Electrical Boxes, Provision Space for Future Additions - Since the J-35-2 design, additional standardization requirements have been developed by the District as they revise and improve their Design Standards. Modification of devices at this time eliminates their replacement in the future. ' Mr. David Ludwin October 29, 2003 Page 3 • Fiber Optics Addition to J-35-2 -The original approach was to have the District responsible for installation of the fiber optic system. During J-35-2 construction it was determined more cost effective to have the contractor install the fiber optics required for the project. The above activities have required modification of design drawings; preparation of contractor RFPs and FCOs; and response to numerous RFis in excess of that originally estimated. At his time our budget has been fully expended and we are requesting the additional funds to provide continued service. Parsons is proposing to locate two staff at the District through the middle of next year to optimize our services. This will allow immediate response to issues and maximize coordination with the District's Construction Management organization. This has worked well for the last 6 months and has demonstrated the effectiveness of working closely with District staff on this complex project. With this arrangement we will be able to maximize productivity especially for the incorporation of the Contractor's redlines into the final record drawings. The general categories of work that are required with a breakdown of the requested budget are as follows: 1. Shop Drawing Submittal Review: This item provides for the continued technical review of contractor submitted shop fabrication drawings for compliance with the project specifications and drawings. The cost of this item is $ 72,900. 2. Assist Staff in Responding to Requests for Information (RFI): This item prepares responses to contractor's questions regarding interpretation of specifications and drawings and resoJution of field interferences. The cost of this item is $86,000. 3. Prepare Backup Materials for Plans Changes/Field Change Orders: This item prepares the necessary drawings and specifications required to describe changes to the project designs so that contractor may propose a cost and schedule for the change. The cost of this item is $64,000. 4. Attend Weekly Progress Meetings: This item is to attend weekly progress meetings with the District staff and the contractor. The cost of this item is $28,000. 5. Attend Miscellaneous Meeting: This item is to attend meetings required to resolve difficulties encountered in the plant during the remaining construction of the project. The cost of this item is $60,200. 6. Prepare Formal Revision Contract Documents for Change Orders: This item is to support the District in the preparation of formal revision to contract (bid) documents. The cost of this item is $44,600. Mr. David Ludwin October 29, 2003 Page4 7. Review Contractor As-Built Data Sheet for All Equipment on P&IDs: This item is to review the contractor input to the equipment data sheets to insure completeness and accuracy. The cost of this item is $43,800. 8. Format Contractor's PI&D Redlines: This item is to prepare the contractors marked up as-built Process and Instrument Diagrams for incorporation into Baseline by the District. The cost of this item is $13,920. 9. Prepare Record Drawings: This item is to prepare the final record drawings for archiving based upon the contractor's marked up as-built drawings approved by the District. The cost of. this item is $117 ,600. 10. Assist in Start-up, Initial Operation and of Facilities: This item is to provide assistance in the initial commissioning and operation ofthe District facilities. The cost of this item is $45,700. 11. Project Management: This item provides additional management of the Parsons staff and subcontractors assigned to the project and single-point contact with the District. The cost of this item is $40,890. The total cost for the above items is $ 617 ,610 which is based on the District providing offices for two staff. The above total includes direct expenses of $18,000. A detailed breakdown of costs is presented in the attached table. During the last 15 months of construction, items have been identified which were not included in the original design. Parsons has worked with the District in resolving these omitted items and getting them constructed in the most cost effective manner. In view of the design difficulties, Parsons is proposing a credit of $78,000 to the $617 ,610 cost reducing it to $539,610. Parsons looks forward to working with the District for the completion of the J-35-2. Please contact me at (626) 440-6263 or Dennis Kasper at (714) 593-7832 if you have any questions or require any additional infonnation. Sincerely, ~~k.~ Surendra K. Thakral, P.E., DEE Vice President-Water & Infrastructure, Inc. Attachment Attachment A J35-2 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SUPPORT: Personnel Hours l Direct Labor I Fringe & : Total Cost · $/hr I Overhead i ! $/hr : i -.1 ---·-----····--·---·----·-·-----+-···"·--·-· ' .--·------·---·------·-·---· Electrical Engineer I 1950 ~ $51.03 I $81.66 I $258,745 ·A;;~-~iat~-E;91~~~·;;[)~~i9ne;-----r·-·-·-·2aoo ___ l $30.34-·-i--$46.ss-T---···--$157~7s3"·-·-· .. ·--.. -· ·---·-·------.. ·--....... _._,.__..,_,_ ____ i---·-----i·--..... ... ..... __ ....... ~·--···---------·-·-··---·-··""" Project Manager j 665 i $56.55 I $90.48 I $100,719 ·---·--··-·...--·~··-·-·-·--··-·-··-·--··-·····-·-·---···-·--··----------·· ....... ···---1··-·-··-· .. ·-·-------"' .. ----.!-----·~-·-------~-..... ,. --··---.. -···· ··---··· .. ---··-- Engineering Disciplines* 300 $48.64 $n.a2 . $37,938 Subtotal -Professional Fees - Direct Expenses Profit at 5% TOTAL DISCOUNT DISCOUNTED TOT AL • Mechanical, Piping, Structural, HVAC Engineers $555,194 $18,000 $44,416 $617,610 $76,000 $539,610 PDC COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin , Director of Engineering Originator: Larry Rein, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION JOB NO. 1-2-4 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Meeting Date 12/04/03 Item Number PDC03 -98 Approve Amendment No . 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation , Job No. 1-2-4 , providing for additional engineering construction support services for an additional amount of $264,900, increasing the total amount not to exceed to $2 ,019 ,411. SUMMARY • The project is located within the Cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. The trunk sewer is in Bushard Avenue between Ellis Avenue and Banning Road , Banning Road between Bushard Avenue and Brookhurst, and Brookhurst between Banning Road and Plant No . 2 . The project consists of four miles of 108-inch sewer pipe. • Construction began in November 2002 , and Boyle Engineering has been providing enginee ring support services , including geotechnical testing since then . • The fees proposed for additional construction support services are estimates prepared by Boyle Engineering and District staff and are based on the current project experience and project needs. All work performed and billed will be on an as requested basis by District staff to support the project. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS A Professional Services Agreement (PSA) was approved with Boyle Engineering Corporation on April 26 , 2000. Please see attached PSA Status Report for subsequent actions. A construction contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on June 26 , 2003. Page 1 To Bel . of Dir . 12/17/03 Item Nu mber 13(h) PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The authorization is within the project's budget for FY2003/04. Funds will need to be reallocated from the Contingency to Consultant Professional Services Agreement. See the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT [81 This item has been budgeted. (Line item : FY 2003-04, Section 8 , Page 43 : Capital Improvement Program , Collections Facilities, Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation , Job No. 1-2-4.) D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Due to construction problems that were previously reported and the complexity of installing a large pipeline in a major street, Staff has found it necessary to increase the design engineer's level of involvement during construction . The involvement has included support in resolving contractor pipe problems and detailed planning for traffic control , among other work. This work is projected to be needed for the continuation of the project and Amendment No. 6 will enable this level of involvement to be maintained. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed . CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27 , 1999 . A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29 , 1999. The project was included in Addendum No. 3 to the Program EIR approved on Dec ember19, 2001 . The addendum did not change the CEQA findings . ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Fee Summary Table. LR :ba:lc G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PD C\1-2-4 AR 120403.doc Page 2 ' • PROJECT/PHASE Phase 1 -Pri"MKt O.·..&l.owo.ment Phase 2 • P1ebm1narv Oes10n Phase 3 . Oesinn Phase 4 -Conshuct10n Phase 5 • Commi:monlna Ph..ue 6 · Close-Ou! Phase 7 • Contmaencv PROJECT TOTAL PROJECT NET Oas· n PSA Cons truction Contr3Ct ' ORIGINAL CURREHT AUTHORlZED PROJECT BUDGET BUDGET s 7 .800 s 74.000 s 15.002 $ 9.200 s 1.051 ,72J s 2.690400 $ 24, 180.051 s 33,84 1.4 17 $ 50.000 s 30.000 s 7,548.924 $ 2.697,983 $ 32,803,501 $ 39,393,000 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION JOB NO. 1·2·4 PROPOSED :<'.·:· FUNDS THIS BUDGET p:~i;~;1 INCREASE AIJTljORIZED1'D AUTHORIZATIOll /DECREASE BUDGET " DATE REQUEST s 74.000 s 74.000 s 9.200 s 9.200 $ s 2 .690,400 s 2.690,400 $ 264,900 s 34 ,106.3 17 $ 33.841.4 17 $ 264,900 $ 50.000 '>'. s 30.000 $ (264,9001 s 2.433.083 $ s 39,393,000 s 36,615,017 $ 264.900 11 PROPOSED ESTIMATED TOTAi. EXPENDITURE AUTHORIZATION TO DATE s 74.f:XYJ s 73.669 s 9.200 s 9 ,147 s 2,690,400 $ 2, 196,653 $ 34,106.317 s 7 .344.634 $ s $ s $ $ 36.879.917 s 9.624.103 32,803,501 $ 39,393,000 s . s 39.393,000 $ 36.61 5.0H 264.900 s 36,879.917 $ 9 .624, 103 269.900 1,754.511 264.900 2.019 ,4 11 $ 1.754.511 264.900 2.019.411 1.319.756 21 .011.000 30.305.227 $ 30.305.227 30.305.227 $ 30.305227 6 .600.000 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Bushard Trunk Sewer Contract No. 1-2-4 Total Project Budget: $39,393,000 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Start Date of Project: June 14, 2000 \ Date 4/26/00 1/11/01 3/21/01 6/27/01 2/28/02 10/23/02 Pending EDMS003757327 Revised 05/14/98 Addendum Original PSA Addendum No.1 Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 3 Addendum No. 4 Addendum 5 Amendment 6 Description Engineering design and construction support services for replacement and/or rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk Sewer. Increasing the utility search activities to include 37 additional potholes Provide for additional study of City of Huntington Beach sewer interfacing. Provide for groundwater hydraulic testing and include fiber optic cable conduit in the construction documents Additional engineering services including geotechnical boring work, City sewer relocation, study of flow handling for construction, Plant No. 2 entrance modifications, City storm drain relocation at Adams Blvd., pavement survey, and the connection to Plant No. 2. Additional engineering services for construction support including submittal review, consultation, meetings, pipe inspection, materials inspection, and geotechnical reviews. Additional engineering services related to pipe problems, traffic control plans, pipe lining study, large number of submittal reviews, and additional meetings. · Cost Accumulated Costs $845,300 $845,300 $24,800 $870,100 $12,808 $882,908 $85,000 $967,908 $231,200 $1, 199, 108 $555,403 $1,754,511 $264,900 $2,019,411 12/10/03 .. ATTACHMENT NO. 1 BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER PROJECT NEEDED FOR FUTURE WORK BY BOYLE TEAM Add.No.6 Addition. Boyle Request-Task Item S No. Comment Contract Amount -w/amend 5 1,754,511 Prebid Meetin2 0 10 Done Consultation during bidding 0 10 Done Award Recommendation 0 10 Done Subtotal bidding services 0 Preconstruction Meeting 0 11 Done Preparation of conformed docs 0 11 Done Submittals (Task 4.2) 5,000 11 23,540 +an additional 5,000 Consultation and meetings•(Task 4.3) 0 13 Done Mt2S. -2.S hrs for 1.5 psns 2 times/me 20,000 13 Remaining from orie.inal budget = $12, 770 Consultation -16 hrs/moxl6 mo. 25,000 13 Assume 12 hrs/mo x 14 mo. Site visits 12 hrs/mo x 16 mo. 0 13 Assume 12 hrs/mo x 14 mo. Ellis Ave. flow diversion studv 0 13 Done Record drawings (Task 4.4) not open Change orders and RFl's (Task4.5) Chane.e orders 30,000 11 Most of remaining portion of budget for this item RFI's 9,000 11 Remainin2 POrtion of buds.et for this partion of buds.et Additional traffic control (during deshm 0 12 I Quality Control and pipe observation 0 14 Subconsultant management 0 11 Pipe problem -past 46,900 11 & 13 As discussed in text Pipe Problem -future 20,000 An allowance .... no reasonable way to absoultely predict More Traffic-Past 27,000 II More Traffic -Future 8,000 Allowance for future Credit for under amt. Traffic -6,000 Bottom Lining 7,500 18 Past Bottom linin2 -credit -2,500 Subtotal of construction Services 189,900 Subtotal biddin2 and construction Svcs. Additional potholing 0 17 Pavement survey 0 9 Geotechnical Submittals (Task 4.2) 0 16 Consultation and Meetings 0 16 Change order review 0 16 RFl's 0 16 Geotech Baseline Report 0 16 Subtotal Geomatrix 0 Subtotal Subconsultants -Consultin2 Geomatrix -Const. Phase Review of plans and specs 0 15 Observations and testing 75,000 15 Geomatrix estimate based on the rate of pipe-layin2 Testing ofsublmldes and pavements 0 15 Laboratory testing •• 0 15 Concrete testing • • 0 15 Report Preparation 0 15 Subtotal Geomatrix /Const. 75,000 $10,000 of which is for the pipe problem TOTAL ADDENDUM NO. 6 264,900 Revised Contract Amount 2,019,411 • Prior to amendment, contract only allowed for 50 hours •• Costs presented are per each test and no estimate of total tests is factored into cost .. PDC COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Julian Sabri, Engineer Meeting Date 12/04/03 Item Number PDC03-99 SUBJECT: CENTRAL GENERATION AUTOMATION ; JOB NO . J-79 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source purchase order agreement with NRG , Inc . for Central Generation Automation , Job No . J-79, providing for the upgrade and reinstallation of nine existing and upgraded turbochargers, for an amount not to exceed $1,570, 191 including sales tax and delivery. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District (District) is planning to upgrade the existing Central Generation System (CGS) Engines at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to reduce the Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) emissions to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1110.2 requirements. This installation will be the first implementation phase of Job No . J-79 . • The original Scope of Work for Job No. J-79 included evaluations of NOx and Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPS) for CGS engines . • For the NOx evaluations at the CGS engines , the Board of Directors approved pilot tests to demonstrate the feasibility and cost of modifying the CGS eng ines with larger turbo-chargers to reduce NOx emissions . • The pilot test, conducted by the engineering consultant (Malcolm Pirnie , Inc.) in November 2003, was successful in the reduction of NOx at one of the CGS engines at Plant No. 2. The implementation cost and schedule information obtained through this pilot test became the basis for the NOx emission improvements for the remainder of the CGS engines at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 . • The District recommends that NRG , Inc. be awarded a sole source contract, as the original equipment manufacturer, to upgrade and reinstall nine rebuilt turbochargers for the CGS engines at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Please see attached Professional Services Agreement Status Report. G :lwp.dtalagenda\Board Agenda Repons\2003 Board Agenda Repons\1203\ltem 13(1).NRG.doc Revised: 8120/98 Page 1 To Bd. of Dir. 12/17/03 Item Number 13(i) PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Approval is being requested for a Purchase Order to NRG, Inc. in the amount of $1,570, 191. The requested Purchase Order amount has been budgeted under the J-79 Capital Improvement Project. An amount of $251,230 is also being requested for Staff time for this installation . Please see attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ~ This item has been budgeted (line Item : Section 8, Page 82) D This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds . D This item has not been budgeted. D Not app licable (information item) No change to the project budget is requested. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Malcolm Pirnie , Inc. the engineering design consultant for this project evaluated the NOx emissions from the District's CG$ engines , and developed specific control measures, schedules, and costs for achieving the SCAQMD standards. The comp li ance date for meeting NOx emissions from CGS engines is December 2004. Preliminary evaluation by Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. identified larger turbo- chargers as the method to achieve the new NOx standards. At the March 26 , 2003 meeting, the Board approved Addendum No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Malcolm Pirnie , Inc. to demonstrate the feasibility and cost of modifying the CGS engines with larger turbo-chargers to reduce NOx emissions. Malcolm Pirnie, lnc.'s Scope of Work included performing all investigations, evaluations, and analyses required to make a recommendation for emission controls , as well as testing of NOx controls on the Central Generation System engines. Cooper-Bessemer is the original manufacturer of the CGS Engines and will be a subcontractor to NRG, In c. for this in sta llation. As part of their contract with the District , NRG , Inc. will utilize the results of the pilot test to adhere to a performance specification provided by the District for the remaining nine turbochargers to ensure that the NOx emission reduction levels will be met as required by SCAQMD . The District recommends that NRG , Inc. be awarded a sole source contract to upgrade the nine existing turbochargers for the CGS Engines at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 . This recommendation is based on the following justifications: G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agen da Rep orts\1203\ltem 13(i).NRG .doc Revised: 8120/98 Page 2 •. ,. ' 1. The prime contractor, NRG Inc., has assembled a team consisting of Cooper/TS!, the original engine and turbocharger manufacturer, and AETC, the developer of the Parametric Emissions Monitoring System (PEMS) which is currently utilized by the District to comply with SCAQMD emissions monitoring requirements. This team is uniquely qualified to retrofit the existing turbochargers to meet a reduced NOx emission limit and modify the Parametric Emission Monitoring System (PEMS) to accurately determine the lower emission values over the engine operating range. The District has presently no specifications for turbochargers. Writing one without detailed knowledge of engine parameters will put the District at the risk of developing inaccurate turbocharger specifications. Cooper/TS! has detailed knowledge of all the necessary engine parameters needed to provide specifications for the turbocharger. 2. The goal of the NOx reduction plan for the Central Generation engines at both plants is to modify the existing turbocharger to produce more air for the engines, thereby reducing NOx emissions. To accomplish this successfully, the software programming for the current PEMS must be modified to allow for the correct prediction of NOx. 3. It must be noted that the software for the PEMS was developed by AETC, and therefore the source code for this software is considered propriety. As a result, PEMS software changes can only be done through AETC since they have both the source code as well the engine modeling tools needed for the accurate prediction of NOx. The District's Operations and Maintenance Department would like to avoid a scenario in which they are dealing with different vendors for the engines and the turbochargers. 4. There is a December 2004 deadline for the District to meet the SCAQMD NOx emission requirements for the CGS engines at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. 5. As part of their services, NRG, Inc. will provide warranties and guarantees to the District to ensure proper operation of the CGS engines to meet the required SCAQMD Rule 1110.2 NOx reduction levels. Based on the pilot testing, Staff is confident that the turbochargers upgraded by NRG, Inc. will reduce the NOx emissions to the level acceptable by SCAQMD. In the unlikely event that the desired level of NOx is not achieved, Staff believes that additional funds will be required to adjust the turbocharger upgrade parameters. 6. The proposal from NRG, Inc. to the District for the turbocharger upgrades included an 18% contingency ($239,521 ). District believes that this contingency amount is in line for tasks involved in this upgrade. To ensure better cost control, District provided for contract payments tied to milestones and deliverables by NRG, Inc. to the District. G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 13(i).NRG.doc Revised: 8120/98 Page3 7. The District met with NRG and negotiated the costs associated with the CGS engines turbochargers installation tasks. Staff, in conjunction with this project's consultant (Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.) concluded that the final cost proposed by NRG, Inc. is acceptable for the upgrades to the CGS engines NOx emissions. Considering the above justification, Staff recommends approval of this sole source contract award to NRG, Inc. for turbocharger modifications and changes to the PEMS algorithm at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to reduce the NOx emission and comply with SCAQMD requirements. ALTERNATIVES Not awarding the contract (no action). Without modifications to the CGS engine turbochargers and PEMS algorithms, the NOx emissions will not be reduced to meet SCAQMD Rule 1110.2 requirements and the District will be in violation. CEQA FINDINGS The project prepares paper and electronic data and is categorically exempt from CEQA. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table JS:jo G:\wp.dta\agenda\PDC\2003\Agenda Reports\03-99 -J-79 -120403 -Revised.doc G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 13(i).NRG.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page4 Oeci n Staff Construction& Installation Commission Closeout Conli PROJECT TOTAL IRe!mbursable Cos1S PROJECT NET NOTES: 100.000 $ 100.000 150000 $ 150.000 600000 $ 600000 $ $ 5800000 5 800.000 $ 150.000 $ 150.000 $ 38.000 $ 38.000 $ 1.000.000 s 1.000.000 $ 8.038.000 $ 8.038.000 $ $ 8,038,000 s 8,038,000 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE CENTRAL GENERATION AUTOMATION JOB NO.J-79 $ 100000 $ $ 150000 s 603407 1403407 s 874.343 $ 122.260 178 $ 8,038,000 $ 782,324 $ 874,343 m $ 8,038,000 782.324 $ 874,343 $ $ s $ (') Replaced govemors for Central Generation Engines (completed under a separate contract) 80.000 $ 17000 21% 51.000 $ 16.000 31% 1.403 407 122.260 $ 122.260 100o/o 1,656,667 $ 155,260 9% 1.656.667 $ 155,260 9% PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bet of Di r. 12/04/03 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin , Director of Engineering Originator: Dean Fisher, Senior Engineer PDC03-94 SUBJECT: ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT REHABILITATION, JOB NO. P1-82 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 13(i) Approve Professional Services Agreement with HOR Engineering for Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation, Job No. P1-82, providing for design services for an amount not to exceed $3 , 125,026. SUMMARY • The purpose of this project is to ensure that the Activated Sludge Plant at Plant No. 1 can operate at its designed capacity with a high degree of reliability. The original aeration basins and secondary clarifiers are over 25 years old and in need of equipment replacement. • Job No . P1 -82 is one of eight projects designated by the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as required in order to meet the District's goal of full secondary treatment by 2012 . This project is also required in order to meet the District goals of providing reliable secondary treated wastewater for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR), and must be completed by March 2007 to coincide with the GWR completion. The June 2007 completion requirement forces a schedule that leaves no room for error or unforeseen circumstances . • The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) includes the following: 1. Preparation of a Technical Memorandum evaluating the existing facility and confirming the process requirements. 2 . Final design of the aeration basin and secondary clarifier rehabilitation . 3 . Detailed constructability and construction sequencing analysis. 4. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Air Quality Management District (AQMD) permit support services. 5. Preparation of bid documents. • Once the construction contract cost is known, staff plans to request additional funding for Construction Management support. G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda ReportS\2003 Board Ag enda Reports\1203~tem 13(!).HDR Engineering.doc Re vi sed: 06/04/03 Page 1 • Submitted proposals from five engineering firms were evaluated in accordance with IP' defined procedures and staff recommends the approval of the PSA to HOR '1 Engineering for an amount not to exceed $3, 125,026. • In order to expedite the continuation of the work during the design phase, the PSA is proposed to include a provision for the General Manager to have authority to approve task orders totaling $100,000. This is approximately 3.5% of the design PSA amount and it allows the General Manager to expeditiously continue with the design process when small changes arise. Each task order will have to be approved by the General Manager and will include a Scope of Work and schedule. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The proposed PSA is a new contract. The only prior Board action was the Capital Improvement Program (GIP) Budget adopted at the June 25, 2003 Board meeting. The budget for this project was approved by the Board of Directors as part of the GIP budget on June 25, 2003. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed PSA is a new contract. The PSA amount and budget necessary for the project are presented in the attached Budget Information Table. A PSA authorization of $3 , 125,026 is being requested. Also requested is reallocation of $1 , 183,616 from contingency to Phase 3 Design, a reallocation of $148 ,000 from Phase 2 Preliminary Design to Phase 3 Design and an authorization of funds for Phase 1, 2 and 3 to cover anticipated staff and consultant costs. BUDGET IMPACT [8] This item has been budgeted . (Line item: 2003 -4 CIP Budget , Section 8, Page 56) D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The purpose of this project is to ensure that the activated sludge plant can operate at its designed capacity with a high degree of reliability. By replacing equipment that has reached the end of its useful life and by restoring the entire process facility, the Orange County Sanitation District (District) will be able to confidently treat the amount of wastewater required by its permittees and those relying on the supply of secondary treated water. G :\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 13(J).HDR Engineering.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page2 Consultant Evaluation and Selection Process A Request for Proposal was issued to seven firms. Five design consulting firms submitted proposals on October 28, 2003: Black and Veatch, Carollo Engineers, HOR, Lee and Ro, and PBS&J. Camp Dresser and McKee (COM) chose not to propose and Cathcart, Garcia and von Langen (CGvL) teamed with HOR. Submitted proposals were transmitted to the Staff Evaluation Team and evaluated in accordance with defined procedures. Based on the Staff Evaluation Team ranking, HOR Engineering had the highest ranking with the best overall proposal as indicated the attached Proposal Evaluation Report. Project Schedule and Consultant PSA The timeline of this project is critical in order to meet the District's full secondary commitments and to provide the amount to secondary wastewater to the Groundwater Replenishment Facility (GWR). This secondary rehabilitation project must be complete by the time the GWR facility has completed construction, which is currently scheduled for March 2007. The Scope of Work has been carefully defined, but this is a rehabilitation project and there may be situations where additional scope items are needed to make the project complete. In order to expedite the design and reduce schedule delays, the consultant's scope of work has been written to include a provision for the General Manager to authorize proceeding with task orders totaling $100,000. This allows the design process to continue with the General Manager's approval. All task orders will include a defined Scope of Work and schedule. This will allow the Consultant to keep working to complete the design without delay due to administrative procedures. The PSA amount is higher than the budgeted amount for this work, but this amount is consistent with the majority of the proposals and does not exceed the project budget contingency. During project scoping, process decisions involving the full secondary plan were still evolving. This project includes plans for nitrification to reduce ammonia. This is the preferred and most cost effective way to treat ammonia and was favored by staff over building a sidestream ammonia facility (J-95) due to less expensive capital costs and a reduced staffing requirement. Process nitrification involves plant modification beyond those originally planned for this project. Once this project completes the preliminary design phase, a more complete analysis of scope and costs will be performed and the budget may require adjustment using funds from the deleted J-95 project. The PSA does not include costs for construction or commissioning services; these amounts will be determined once the design is complete and the scope of services is better defined. ALTERNATIVES Operate and continue to repair and rehabilitate the existing facilities. Staff does not recommend this option because it will not meet the Districts goals of reducing Operations and Maintenance requirements, being able to treat full secondary to the maximum capacity, and providing the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) with the agreed amount of treated wastewater. G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 13m.HDR Engineering.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page3 CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt from CEQA under Section 15302. A Notice of Exemption was filed at the County Clerk's office on November 4, 2003. ATTACHMENT 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Summary of Staff Evaluation of Proposals & Staff Recommendation DF:ba G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203\ltem 130).HDR Engineering.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page4 PROJEC17PllASE Phase l • Prolect Otvell\nft'\en1 PhMG 2 • Prehmln•uv Oeskrl PhM4!3 ·0e~ Ph~• 4 . Con:trucbOn P ha !;.e 5 • Commls~onlnn Ph~ 6 • Oos..out PMs.a 7 ·Coor~ PROJECT TOTAL I Relm bu rs~ble Co'1$ PROJECT NET EOMS 003752-IQO O~GINAI. AUTHORIZED BUDGET s • CURRENT PROJECT BUDGET S0,000 448.000 2.688.000 17,323,000 299.000 75.000 2.987.000 23.870,000 BUDGET IN FOR MAT ION TABLE Activated Sludge Rehabilitation PROPOSED BUDGET INCREASE 1148 000 $ t~1.816 {1, t e.3.616 s Job No. P l -82 PROPOSED REVISED BllDGET S0.000 $ 300.000 4 ,0 19.6 16 $ 17.323.000 299.000 75.000 1.803.384 $ 23.870.000 I I FUNDS THIS AUTHORIZED TC AllTH ORIZATlOll DATE REQUEST $d 5o000 $ 300000 .$ 4,0 19.lU6 ·\::" $ 4.369,616 . s 23.870.000 $ • $ 23.870,000 . $ $ 3 ,024 135 $ 3.12S,026 3 .125.026 s 14.934.000 14.934.000 PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ~~~ AllTHORJZATION exi>al=ETO TO DA~) $ 50000 33.450 $ 300000 6.950 ... $ .:019616 $ 4 ,369.618 , .. 4 ,369.6 16 $ 40,400 , .. 3.125.026 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation Job No. P1-82 Total Project Budget: $ 23,870,000 Consultant: $ 3, 125,026 Start Date of Project: July 1, 2003 Date Pending EDMS 003757676 Revised 05/14/98 Addendum Description Original Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation, PSA Job. No. P1 -82 Cost Accumulated Costs $ 3,125,026 $ 3,125,026 12/10/03 ., 4 ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT REHABILITATION AT PLANT N0.1 JOB NO. P1-82 Proposal Evaluation Report Request for Proposals (RFP's) were sent on September 8, 2003 to the following consulting firms: • Black and Veatch • Carollo Engineers • Camp, Dressler & McKee (COM) • Cathcart, Garcia and Von Langen (CGvL) • HOR Engineering • Lee and Ro • PBS&J Camp, Dressler & McKee (CDM) declined to submit a proposal. Cathcart, Garcia and Von Langen (CGvL) partnered with HDR Engineering for this project. As a result, there were five responsive proposals received on October 28, 2003. Proposals were reviewed in-house by a review panel from October 28 to November 6, 2003. The review panel consisted of eight members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (1 O being best) in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work (Weight 10) - Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work (Weight 5) -Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience (Weight 6) -Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications (Weight 5) -A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants (Weight 3) -Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule (Weight 6) -Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. Do the scheduling techniques and tools proposed satisfy the project need. After reviewing and grading the proposals, the Evaluation Team met on November 6, 2003 and the five consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The attached Table No. 1 presents the results of the team evaluation and the proposals received. The two top ranked firms were ranked as follows: 1. HOR Engineering 2319 Points 2. Carollo Engineers 2170 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the top ranked consultant: HOR Engineering The HOR proposal was collectively ranked as the best overall proposal received. This proposal was ranked either first or second by seven of the eight reviewers. Overall this proposal was viewed as having been very detailed and responsive with a clear understanding of the project. The staff proposed for the project was viewed as excellent. The team proposed for this project has just completed a similar project for the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. There was some concern about some work being produced in their Sacramento office (not locally) and their lack of experience with OCSO, but this did not deter from the overall package as these were felt to be obstacles the proposed team could overcome. The following attributes formed the basis for HOR Engineering's high ranking: 1. Excellent project manager. 2. Solid understanding of the process and the plant operation. 3. Recent relevant experience. 4. Excellent subconsultants and team organization. Fee Proposals After the final ranking of the technical proposals, the sealed fee proposals submitted by all the firms were opened. The total fee received from the consultants arranged in the order of the final technical ranking was: HOR Engineering Carollo Engineers Black and Veatch Lee and Ro PBS&J $2,789,866 $3,793,656 $2,946,935 $1,949,405 $2,530,300 The HOR proposal was the third highest proposal at $2,789,866. This proposal seems to be comparatively in line with the other candidates, and the differences did not warrant a change in the panel's choice. The review panel recommended award of the PSA to HOR Engineering pending a meeting to verify the entire package with the consultant. Following the selection process, OCSD staff and the consultant met to review and verify the scope of work. The complete project scope and fees were discussed. During this meeting the Consultant requested the District consider three additional scope items that were not originally considered in the scope, but may be needed for the project as a result of the initial process modeling done by the consultant during the proposal period. Upon further review of these items, OCSD decided to include these three additional items into the project scope. These items include computer modeling of the clarifiers, an additional aeration blower, and an addition of smaller channel air blowers. The revised proposal was amended to $3, 127,891, including $100,000 added for miscellaneous task order authorizations by the District. Based on the data provided above plus the highest technical ranking, Staff recommends that HOR Engineering be awarded the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation, Job No. P1 -82 for a total design fee not to exceed $3, 125,026. DF:ba EDMS\00375767 4 HOR Engineering Reviewer A 311 Reviewer B 304 Reviewer C 291 Reviewer D 264 Reviewer E 340 Reviewer F 284 Reviewer G 230 Reviewer H 295 TOTAL 2,319 SCORE AVERAGE 290 SCORE TECHNICAL 1 RANKING HOR Engineering Phase 2 + 3 19,822* Hours Phase 2 + 3 $2, 789,866* Costs,$ Cost per hr, $140.75 for Ph 2 + 3, $/hr Overhead 94% Rate,% TABLE 1 Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation Job No. P1 -82 Carollo Black and Lee & Ro Veatch 262 347 260 308 267 227 294 282 212 212 184 149 290 250 188 199 174 128 303 308 235 292 297 124 2,160 2,109 1,523 270 264 190 2 3 4 TABLE2 Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation Job No. P1 -82 Carollo Black and Lee & Ro Veatch 26,921 21, 111 15,380 $3,793,656 2,946,935 1,949,405 $140.92 $139.59 $126.74 97% 115.3% 99% PBS&J 230 193 200 255 173 83 112 201 1,447 181 5 PBS&J 14,367 2,530,300 $176.12 85% * Note: Proposal changed to $3, 125,026 (22,311 hours) with inclusion of additional scope items and $100,000 task order authorization. I~ . The FAHR minutes of the meeting held December 10, 2003 were not available for this mailing. These minutes will be distributed at the December 17, 2003 Board of Directors meeting. Once the minutes are finalized, they will also be available on the District's website (www.ocsd.com). FAHR COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White , Controller Meetin g Da te To Bd . of Di r. 1 2/10/03 12/17/03 Item Num ber Item Number 14(b) SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2003 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2003 . SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Investment Policy. The portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements . As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO 's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Long-Term Operating Monies, there is a investment policy compliance exception pertaining to the holding of two securities within PIMC0 1s Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio that had an acceptable rating at the time of purchase but has since fallen below the minimum rating allowed by the investment policy. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The first of these rating exceptions pertains to the holding of a United Airlines (UAL) Asset Backed Security with a par value of $1 .6 million, representing 0.42 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating from Moody's has fallen several times, from A3 to BA 1, then to BA3, B3, B, and finally to CA. Likewise, the rating from Standard & Poor's has also fallen several times, first from A-to BBB , then to BB , then to B+, B-, and finally to CCC+. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the t ime of purchase , PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if the security was sold at this time. The second ratings exception pertains to the holding of a $1 million par of the Philip Morris-Altria corporate bond with an April 2004 maturity, representing 0 .3 percent of the portfolio holdings , whose rating with Moody's has fallen from A2 to Baa1 and then to G:\wp .dla\lin\220\whlte\FAHR\Monlhly Treasurer Report\200l-041TREASRPT121003.doc Page 1 Baa2, and with S&P from A-to BBB . During the month of November, PIMCO sold $4 million par of this original $5 million holding at a price of $101 .9 for a realized loss of $134,400. PIMCO believes based on the underlying assets of the parent company, that the District would suffer a severe unwarranted loss if the remaining $1 million holdings were sold at this time . The District's investment policy does not require any action because of "credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. However, PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit for these two securities very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. BUDGET IMPACT D This item has been budgeted . (Line item : k8J Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period . In addition , a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). The remaining $107.0 million proceeds from the 2003 COP debt issuance available for future capital improvements is be ing managed and invested by PIMCO with Union Bank of California serving as the Trustee . When combined with the reserves of the existing outstanding debt issues, total debt service reserves with trustees totals $168,911,200. The District received $14.7 million from the fiscal year 2003-04 first property tax and user fee apportionment from the County of Orange on November 26. Of this amount, $12 million was deposited within the Distri ct's Liquid Operating Portfolio with Mellon Bank with the remainder used to fund current obligations. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next si x months. The table on the following page details the book balances of the District's investment accounts at month -end . A graphical representation of month -end balances is shown on the attached bar chart . G:lwp.dta\fln\220\whlte'F AHR\Monthly Treasurer Rep0f112003-04\TREASRPT 121003 .doc Page 2 Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts November 30, 2003 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 31,000,246 1.57 Union Bank Checking Account 1,003,239 0.93 (1) PIMCO -Short-term Portfolio 49,784,182 1.40 PIMCO -Long-term Portfolio 381,297 ,099 2.70 Petty Cash s.ooo NIA TOTAL $463 089 Z66 2.48 Debt Service Reserves w/Trustees S168911 200 2.14 (1) This is the annualized yield for the month of October. The November annualized rate was not available as of the date of this report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Graph of Monthly Investment Balances by Type -Last Six Months 2. Investment Transactions and Balances in the State Local Agency Investment Fund 3. PIMCO Monthly Investment Recap & Yield Analysis Report 4. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report -Liquid Operating Monies 5. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report-Long-Term Operating Monies 6. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors -Liquid Operating Monies 7. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors -L-T Operating Monies 8. Mellon Trust Yield Analysis Report 9. Mellon Trust Asset Detail -Consolidated 10. Mellon Trust Transaction Detail -Consolidated MW:lc G:\wp.dla\fin\220\white\F AHR\Monlhly Treasurer Report\2003-04\TREASRPT121003.doc Page 3 Prepared by Finance, 12/10/2003, 11 :26 AM Monthly Investment Balances by Type- Last Six Months $700 ,000,000 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ $600,000,000 -!------------- $500,000,000 --<------------ $400,000,000 $300 ,000 ,000 $100 ,000,000 -t--1 $0 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 ~ PIMCO -Long-term ~ PIMCO -Short-term ~COP Debt Reserves mLAIF o Ban k Accts B Petty Cash G:\excel.dta\fin\220\white\Trea s ury Management\Monthly In vestment Balances Graph.xis October 2003 November 2003 ·= ~ ... ,. ' .. Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund November 30, 2003 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Balance October 1, 2003 $35,500,246 $35,500,246 $35,500,246 1.572 Deposits: 11/18/2003 11,600,000 11,600,000 11,600,000 1.572 Withdrawals: 11/6/2003 (4,600,000) (4,600,000) (4,600,000) 1.572 11/12/2003 (1 ,000,000) (1,000,000) (1 ,000,000) 1.572 11/13/2003 (500,000) (500,000) (500,000) 1.572 11/14/2003 (3,600,000) (3,600,000) (3,600,000) 1.572 11/20/2003 (3,000,000) (3,000,000) (3,000,000) 1.572 11/21/2003 ~3,400,000} (3,400,000} ~3,400,000} 1.572 Total Withdrawls (16, 100,000) (12,700,000) (12,700,000) 1.572 Balance October 31, 2003 $31,000,246 $34,400,246 $34,400,246 1.572 Yield 1.572 1.572 1.572 1.572 1.572 1.572 1.572 1.572 1.572 1.572 PIM C 0 December 8, 2003 Mr. Mike White, CPA Controller Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis A venue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Dear Mike: The following is a description of events in the bond markets during the month of November in addition to an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Tenn, Liquid, and COP Proceeds portfolios over the period. Also included is a section on our outlook and preferred strategies to be pursued in your portfolios during the coming months. Bond Market Recap: Despite a spate of strong economic releases, muted inflation expectations provided the backdrop for most fixed-income sectors to post modest gains in November. U.S. Treasuries returned 0.13%, while the S&P 500 was up 0.71% for the month. Yields rose across intermediate maturities, with bonds maturing between 2 and 10 years underperforming both shorter and longer maturities. Mortgage-backed securities returned 0.2 I%, outpacing Treasuries by I 5 basis points after adjusting for duration. Corporate bonds also performed well as the Lehman Credit Index returned 0.46%, for a duration-adjusted excess return of 35 basis points. Lower quality investment grade names outperformed as Baa-rated bonds led Treasuries by 59 basis points on a duration-adjusted basis. High yield bonds continued to provide excellent returns across the quality spectrum, with the overall Lehman High Yield Index posting an absolute return of 1.52% for the month (+148 basis points adjusted for duration). Revisions to third quarter GDP reflected an even more remarkable 8.2% annualized pace than the 7.2% originally reported. Growth was driven by personal consumption expenditures, equipment/software spending and residential fixed investment, with an increase in inventory stockpiling accounting for a large part of the revision. Manufacturing accelerated, with the ISM index surging past the 60-point mark, indicating that manufacturing job losses are ending and perhaps reversing. Indeed, the Bureau of Labor Statistics' employment report indicated net job increases of 126,000 in October, beating consensus estimates and pushing the unemployment rate down to 6.0% from 6.1 %. In addition, consumer confidence reached its highest level in over a year, 91. 7 as measured by the Conference Board index. Still, inflation remained benign; both the October CPI and PPI figures showed no significant price increases being borne by consumers or producers, respectively. Mr. Mike White, CPA Orange County Sanitation District December 8, 2003 Pagel Treasury yield changes during the month ofNovember are summarized as follows: • 3-month bills: -2 basis point to 0.93% • 6-month bills: unchanged at 1.03% • 2-year notes: + 22 basis points to 2.05% • 5-year notes: +11 basis points to 3.35% • I 0-year notes: +4 basis points to 4.33% • 30-year notes: unchanged at 5.13% Performance Attribution: Long-Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.10 percent for the month of November, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 11 basis points. The following points summarize returns for the period ended November 30: • The Long-Term portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 11 basis points for the month. • For the twelve-month period, the Long-Term portfolio returned 4.18%, outperforming the benchmark by 10 basis points. • Portfolio duration, near the index, was neutral for performance. • Broader-than-index yield curve positioning was positive for performance as yields rose most in the 1-5 year sector. • An underweight exposure to Treasuries was positive, as the sector lagged during the month. • Exposure to mortgage-backed securities was positive for relative performance as the sector outperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • Corporate issues were positive for performance as the sector continued to perform strongly relative to other bond market sectors; however, an underweight exposure relative to the benchmark was negative. Liquid Portfolio The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.09 percent during the month of November, performing in line with the 3-month Treasury Bill Index for the month. The following points summarize returns for the period ending November 30: • The Liquid portfolio performed in line with the benchmark for the month. • For the twelve-month period, the Liquid portfolio returned 1.26%, outperforming the benchmark by 15 basis points. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. ti Mr. Mike White, CPA Orange County Sanitation District "2003 COP Proceeds -Future Construction" Portfolio December 8, 2003 Page3 The COP Proceeds portfolio that PIM CO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.09 percent during the month of November, performing in line with the 3-month Treasury Bill Index. The following points summarize returns for the period ending November 30: • The Liquid portfolio performed in line with the benchmark for the month. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. Outlook and Strategy: PIMCO is optimistic about the cyclical outlook, forecasting an upturn in the U.S. economy over the next six to 12 months with a positive spillover effect into global demand. This revival will, however, either exacerbate or fail to redress secular imbalances such as the U.S. current account deficit, structural rigidities in Europe and huge public sector debt in Japan. Confronting these problems will constrain growth, making PIMCO pessimistic about the sustainability of the upturn beyond a cyclical time frame. Inflation will be contained by slack in labor markets and industrial capacity as well as productivity growth. Tame inflation will help keep interest rates range-bound over the next year, with I 0-year Treasury yields hovering around 4% to 5%. There will be volatility within this range, however, as markets reassess prospects for sustainable growth. Key elements of PIMCO's forecast are: • Disposable personal income will get a boost from federal tax cuts and the lagged impact of the mortgage refinancing boom. • The Federal Reserve will support recovery by keeping the federal funds rate at I percent for at least the next year. • It remains unclear whether corporate risk appetites will revive enough to fuel the rebound in capital spending and hiring that is critical for sustained growth. • Growth prospects are improved in Europe, helped by the U.S. recovery and tax cuts in Germany. Growth will remain below potential, however, held back by rigid product and labor markets. • External demand is sparking a recovery in Japan, especially among globally competitive Japanese corporations, which are paying higher real wages and investing surplus cash in China. A rally in Japanese stocks has bolstered the balance sheets of Japan's troubled banks. • China, struggling to employ workers shifting from agricultural labor and away from state-owned firms, will continue its export-driven economic policy for now. It will help fund the U.S. trade deficit on favorable terms and resist a currency revaluation. Caution is warranted given potential volatility around economic releases and full valuations in core bond sectors. Even so, we see ample opportunity to add value. With rates expected to be stable, we will target near-index duration but we will take modest exposure on the short end of the yield curve as markets are pricing in more restrictive central bank policies than we foresee. A Mr. Mike White, CPA Orange County Sanitation District December 8, 2003 Page4 short maturity focus will allow PIMCO to reap gains by "rolling down" the steep short/intermediate maturity yield curve. Another way to exploit the steep curve is to buy bonds with longer settlement periods and invest cash backing the unsettled issues in short term debt with relatively high yields. Mortgage-backed bonds are fairly priced now, so we will limit exposure to this sector. We will remain underweight in corporate bonds, which generally offer slim yield premiums for the credit risk we see. Outside these core strategies, however, real return bonds remain compelling as a long term holding given their historically attractive real yields and ability to hedge secular inflation risk. We look forward to discussing these and other topics with you in the near future. Best regards, Christine Telish, CF A Vice President John M. Miller, CF A Senior Vice President Orange County Sanitation District for the month ending November 30, 2003 Total Return Account -203 Market Value Book Value Yield to Maturity Short Term Account-603 Market Value Book Value Yield to Maturity With Accrued Interest 384,450,000 380,282,394 2.70 With Accrued Interest 50,017,237 50,335,025 1.40 2003 COP Proceeds -Future Construction -2203 Market Value Book Value Yield to Maturity Wrth Accrued Interest 107,293,213 107,431,794 1.41 Without Accrued Interest 381,324,661 377,157,055 2.72 Without Accrued Interest 49,787,577 50,105,364 1.41 Without Accrued Interest 106,927,129 107,065,709 1.41 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 2003) Liquid Operating Monies (603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIM CO • Mellon Historical Cost: • PIM CO • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: Of Index: 15.1.3 1%INTERESTRATECHANGE Dollar Imoact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) by Period: 1 Month: 3 Months: 12 Months: Fiscal Year-to-Date: Commentary • The Liquid portfolio outperformed the benchmark by I basis point for the molllth, and by 5 basis points fiscal year-to-date. • PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper an1d short-term notes contributed to performance. G:\wp.dta\fin\220\whlte\Treasury Mgmt\LIQOS00-03-11.RPT.doc Page 1of1 $50,017,23 7 $50,016,650 $50,335,025 $50,337,832 0.33 0.20 $165,057 0% 51% ''AAA'' 0% Yes Portfolio Index 0.09 0.08 0.29 0.24 1.26 1.11 0.45 0.40 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 2003) Long-Term Operating Monies (203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIM CO • Mellon Historical Cost: • PIM CO • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: Of Index: 15.1.3 1%INTERESTRATECHANGE Dollar Impact {gain/loss) of 1 % Change: 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: {see attached schedule) 15.1.S PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Oualitv: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RA TING % of Portfolio Below "A": 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) by Period: 1 Month: 3 Months: 12 Months: Fiscal Year-to-Date: • The Long-Tenn portfolio outperfonned the benchmark by 11 basis points for the month, and by 23 basis points fiscal year-to-date. • Portfolio duration, near the index, was neutral for perfonnance. • Broader-than-index yield curve positioning was positive for performance as yields rose most in the l-5 year sector. • An underweight exposure to Treasuries was positive, as the sector lagged during the month. • Exposure to Mortgage-backed securities was positive for relative perfonnance as the sector outperfonned Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. ~I Page 1of3 $384,450,000 $384,500,951 $380,282,394 $381,090,782 2.24 2.47 $8,611,680 0% 14% AAA 0% No* Portfolio Index 0.10 -0.01 1.23 0.96 4.18 4.08 -0.05 -0.28 • Corporate issues were positive for performance as the sector continued to perfc0rm strongly relative to other bond market sectors; however, an underweight exposure relative to the benchmark was negative. *Compliance Issues: MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 2003) Page2of3 $1,600,000 par of United Airlines <UAL> Pass-Through 2001-1-C (Enhanced Eguipment Trust Certificate CEETC)-909317BC2l, 6.831% coupon, 9/1/2008 maturity, representing 0.42% of the portfolio holdings on a par basis was purchased on 8/10/2001; and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAI (on 9/18/2001) and S&P from A-to BBB (on 9/20/2001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BAI to BA3 (on 12/21/2001) and by S&P from BBB to BB (on 6/28/02). Following news of the possible bankruptcy filing, the security was further downgraded in August (83 Moody's, B+ by S&P). On November 29, 2002, S&P further downgraded this issue to B, and shortly thereafter on December 9. 2002, downgraded the issue one notch further to B-. On August 7, 2003, S&P downgraded the issue to CCC+, while Moody's followed suit on August 28, 2003 with a downgrade to CA. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. On November 20, UAL reported income of$25 million in October, excluding reorganization expenses of$149 million, meeting requirements of its debtor-in-possession bankruptcy financing for the ninth straight month. UAL ended October with a c:ash balance of about $2.5 billion. UAL's organization and movement through bankruptcy process has been less efficient than US Airways and Air Canada. The company has yet to articulate a clear and coherent fleet plan, which makes the timing of emergence from Chapter 11 diifficult to predict. PIM CO does not expect to see a completed reorganization until mid-2004 at the earliest. PIMCO continues to negotiate with UAL on the District's holdings and currently lead an ad hoc committee. This has been an extremely complicated effort due to the complex nature ofUAL's bankruptcy. These negotiations have required PIMCO's analysts access to non-public information and they are now at a point in these workout negotiations where restructuring options are being discussed. Details on the options are non-public information and therefore sharing them results in parties becoming restricted. In light of this extremely complicated bankruptcy, PIMCO continues to strive to act in the most prudent manner to obtain maximum recovery. $1,000,000 par of Philip Morris-Altria NT (cusip 718154CH8l, 4/112004 maturity, representing 0.3% of the portfolio holdings on a par basis was purchased on 8/6/2001 at a price of 105.26. This security was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A2 to Baal on 4/01/2003, and then from Baal to Baa2 on 4/23/03. The security was downgraded by S&P from A-to BBB on 4/10/2003. The District's investment P'°licy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. In November, PIMCO sold $4,000,000 par (of the $5,000,000 original holding) at a price of 101.9 for a realized loss of$134,400. The Philip Morris USA downgrade activity was a result of a negative court judgment and its associated bonding requirement. In the Miles case, named after the initial plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit, an Illinois court fmed Philip Morris $10.3 billion for allegedly deceiving smokers into thinking that "light" cigarettes were safer than regular cigarettes. The company, now a subsidiary of Altria, has said that the lawsuit was flawed and that it planned to appeal the ruling and the class certification order that preceded it. Prior to the judgment, PIMCO's analysis of Altria (the holding company and issuer of the debt) shows investment grade credit metrics even excluding in its entirety Philip Morris USA (the domestic tobacco subsidiary and the entity subject to all of the legal suits). The analysis was based on the assumption that the horizon of any final verdict would be years in the future, while the company would generated significant cash fl<>w in the interim. On November 24, Philip Morris was found not liable in a case brought by the wife of a man who smoked Marlboro cigarettes and died after developing lung cancer. This case, as well as other recent court rulings have been Altria's favor and continue to dampen the legal risks faced by the company. PIMCO believes Altria is unlikely to sacrifice good subsidiaries to fund the bad one, which would create a bad precedent for future court cases. PIMCO continues to hold their positions at the holding company (Altria) level, but have suspended any additional purchases until greater clarity emerges on the likelihood of various outcomes. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 2003) Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P, with at least a BBB in the event of a split rating. Page3of3 • $3,500,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities ($2.5 million represented by cusip 345397813 maturing 7 /16/04 and $1 million represented by cusip 345397GV9 maturing 5/15/05), representing 0.91 % of the portfolio holdings on a par basi:s. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+, then to BBB on 10/25/02, and then to BBB-on 11/13/03. Moody's downgraded the securities on 1/16/{)2 from A2 to A3. • $3,000,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities (cusip 370425803) maturing on August 28, 2007, representing 0.78% of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+, and a further downgrade to BBB occurring on 10/16/2002. The securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade from A2 on 6/14/03. • $1, 750,000 par of Virginia Electric Power NT securities ( cusip 92 7804ENO), maturing in 2006, represents 0.46% of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The security was downgraded on 10/21/2002 by S&P from A-to BBB+, but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A3. G:lwp.dtaljinl2201whitel Treasury MgmdL-TOB00-03-11.RPT.doc ·-··-·------·---------------------· ------------------ -Report ID: GL8251 •• J" Base Currency: USD Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors ______ l_ll~O / 2003 ···--·---·---- Cost Description Shares Par Base Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: Status: FIN~ Market Value Base %of Total Net Unrealized Gain/Loss Base ·-·----·--·------·----------------------~--------------·-----------J CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR INTEREST COMMERCIAL PAPER -DISCOUNT FED HM LOAN BNK -LESS THAN 1 YR FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LESS THAN 1 FNMA ISSUES -LESS THAN 1 YR MUTUAL FUNDS REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS TREASURY BILLS -LESS THAN 1 YR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR BANKING & FINANCE INDUSTRIAL U.S. AGENCIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS UTILITY-TELEPHONE U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES TOTAL ASSETS -BASE: 1,000,000.000 6,900,000.000 6,800,000.000 5,000,000.000 207,675.010 5,000,000.000 5,500,000.000 30,407 ,675.010 30,407 ,675.010 6,497 ,000.000 300,000.000 6,650,000.000 5,000,000.000 650,000.000 19,097,000.000 19,097,000.000 49,504,675.010 ·-----·----------·--·------- 1 232,467.79 232,467.79 0.46% 0.00 999,008.33 999,008.33 2.00% 0.00 6,871,741.11 6,871,741.11 13.74% 0.00 6,769,992.50 6,769,992.50 13.54% 0.00 4,981,130.00 4,981,130.00 9.96% 0.00 207,675.01 207,675.01 0.42% 0.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 10.00% 0.00 5,472,232.35 5,472,232.35 10.94% 0.00 30,534,247.09 30,534,247.09 61.05% 0.00 30,534,247.09 30,534,247.09 61.05% 0.00 6,715,326.98 6,609,451.45 13.21% -105,875.53 308,808.00 300,000.00 0.60% -8,808.00 6,876,036.50 6,705,680.33 13.41% -170,356.17 5,226,367.19 5,212,500.00 10.42% -13,867.19 677,046.50 654,771.00 1.31% -22,275.50 19,803,585.17 19,482,402.78 38.95% -321,182.39 19,803,585.17 19,482,402.78 38.95% -321,182.39 50,337 ,832.26 50,016,649.87 100.00% -321,182.39 Workbench r--·· -·---·--····----------·---····-··-···-------------------·----~-------···-__ ----_J-L A t S Report ID: GL8251 sse ummary Base Currency: USD by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: LONG TERMOPER-PlMCO-OCSF0752220~----___ _ ________ l)._/3(>[~.Q_Q~-----·-·-Status: FINAL c:::~ion --:-~=~ ~~~~s __ P~ . ____ ~~-~t _ _B~se -~~;ket Va~:~e __ -~----_;_~_t:! CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR PENDING TRADES INTEREST COMMERCIAL PAPER -DISCOUNT FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LESS THAN 1 FNMA ISSUES -LESS THAN 1 YR MUTUAL FUNDS REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS TREASURY BILLS -LESS THAN 1 YR U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR ABS -AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES BANKING & FINANCE COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATION FHLMC MULTICLASS FHLMC POOLS FNMA POOLS GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS INDUSTRIAL INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES PVT PLACEMENTS -MORE THN 1 YR U.S. AGENCIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS UTILITY -ELECTRIC UTILITY -TELEPHONE U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,800,000.000 3 1,300,000.000 7,200,000.000 3,214,872.140 4,800,000.000 3 7 ,900,000.000 87,214,872.140 87,214,872.140 1,600,000.000 3 1 ,835,000.000 2,425,788.580 1,125,040.990 158,617.560 45,988,263.810 3,432,766.520 10,003,606.180 8,000,000.000 34,480,870.000 752,000.000 41,151,380.890 9 2,597 ,276.280 4,750,000.000 3,000,000.000 281,300,610.810 281,300,610.810 ----------------------··----------· ··---------------- -2,759,368.28 -2,759,368.28 -0.72% 3,203,851.80 3,203,851.80 0.83% 2,790,420.11 2,790,420.11 0.73% 31,209,102.61 31,209J102.61 8.12% 7,172,745.24 7,172,745.24 1.87% 3,214,872.14 3,214,872.14 0.84% 4,800,000.00 4 ,800,000.00 1.25% 37,706,336.65 37 ,706,336.65 9.81% 87 ,337,960.27 87 ,337,960.27 22.71% 87 ,337 ,960.27 87 ,337 ,960.27 22.71% 1,600,000.00 241,168.00 0.06% 32,969,231.00 33,470,841.10 8.71% 2,425,788.58 2,593,289.28 0.67% 1,126,239.59 1,116,929.44 0.29% 158,691.63 163,247.78 0.04% 47,092,727.11 47,014,098.40 12.23% 3,415,592.00 3,467 ,633.26 0.90% 10,168,463.72 10,489,526.48 2.73% 8,248,380.00 8,238,240.00 2.14% 34,497,881.71 38,051,306.05 9.90% 826,199.84 826,199.84 0.21% 42,228,119.55 43,842,615.67 11.40% 100,770,646.50 99,201,512.83 25.80% 4,694,370.00 5,009,042.50 1.30% 3,530,490.00 3,437,340.00 0.89% 293,752,821.23 297' 162,990.63 77.29% 293,752,821.23 297, 162,990.63 77.29% Net Unrealized Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,358,832.00 501,610.10 167,500.70 -9,310.15 4,556.15 -78,628.71 52,041.26 321,062.76 -10,140.00 3,553,424.34 0.00 1,614,496.12 -1,569,133.67 314,672.50 -93,150.00 3,410,169.40 3,410,169.40 1 Workbench • WI [ -----------------------. ·-------· --· ----by As~:·~:::::~c::rs -------Alternate e_!_:_:e_:_~_!r_:_:.;..;.~~~..;;...;.~_~.;__~_c..:~=2:::.....5_1 _-f] ____ . Exchange Rate: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -OCSF07522202 __ ·-·--· ______ _ _ _____ l_l [~0 [ 2003 -· --------·. ___ --·---Status: FINAL -------·-------. -·------··--· --· ---··--- Cost Description Shares Par Base Market Value Base %of Total Net Unrealized Gain/Loss Base ·--------------------------- TOTAL ASSETS -BASE: 368,s15,482.950 ___ 3_8_1 __ ,0_9_o_,_7_8_1._s_o ___ 3_8_4.;_,s_o_o.;_,9_s_o_.9_o 100.00% ___ 3....:;,_4_10....:;,_1_69_._4_0 ----------------·--------·--· --------·--· 2 Workbench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07Slll02 2003/11/30 RUN DATE : 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME I 10.38.34 ========================================================~==================================================================== PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARRET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOO!K YIELD S-P PRICE MARRET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS l,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC • 000 .ooo P-1 99.901 999,008.33 3.29 26354BZH8 12/17/2003 999,008.33 2.01 1,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC • 000 .ooo P-1 99.688 1,395,630.83 4.60 313384SS9 A-1+ 1,395,630.83 2.eo 600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC • 000 .ooo P-1 99.614 597 ,681.67 1.97 313384SWO HAT 02/09/2004 A-1+ 597,681.67 1.20 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC • 000 .ooo P-1 99.732 1,994,641.11 6.58 313384TN9 HAT 02/25/2004 A-1+ 1,994,641.11 4.01 900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CINS DISC • 000 .ooo P-1 99.462 895,162.50 2.95 313384UK3 HAT 03/17/2004 A-1+ 895,162.50 1.80 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC • 000 .ooo P-1 99.431 1,988,625.00 6.56 313384XA2 MAT 05/19/2004 A-1+ 1,988,625.00 3.99 3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC • 000 .ooo P-1 99. 731 2,991,937.50 9.87 313396TP8 HAT 02/26/2004 A-1+ 2,991,937.50 6.01 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC • 000 .ooo P-1 99.422 3,778,055.00 12.46 313396UZ4 HAT 03/31/2004 A-1+ 3,778,055.00 7.59 3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT .ooo .ooo P-1 99.754 2,992,606.11 9.87 313588TF2 A-1+ 2,992,606.11 6.01 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .ooo .ooo P-1 99.426 1,988,523.89 6.56 313588XA8 HAT 05/19/2004 A-1+ 1,988,523.89 3.99 1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .ooo .ooo P-1 99.516 1,194,191.67 3.94 912795PK1 DUE 02/12/2004 DD 08/14/2003 A-1+ 1,194,191.67 2.40 4,300,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .ooo .ooo P-1 99.489 4,278,040.68 14.11 912795QA2 DUE 05/27/2004 DD 11/28/2003 A-1+ 4,278,040.68 8.59 5,000,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO .ooo 1.020 100.000 s,000,000.00 16.50 99413F174 01.020% 12/01/2003 DD 11/28/03 s,000,000.00 10.04 .. , YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSF07Sl1102 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME I 10.38.34 ==============================================================================================================~============== PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 207,675.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .ooo .812 AAA 100.000 207,675.01 .68 996085247 AAA 207,675.01 .42 -----------------------------------------TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS .ooo .053 30,301,779.30 100.00 30,301,779.30 60.86 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 100,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NA MTN SR00043 .ooo 7.617 AAl 103.984 104,199.00 .53 045906BU7 7.920% 07/13/2004 DD 07/13/94 AA-103,984.00 .21 1,000,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH AMER .ooo 5.701 AAl 101. 734 1,041,290.00 5.22 046003KA6 5.800% 04/20/2004 DD 04/20/99 AA-1,017,340.00 2.04 soo,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA CORP SR GBL NT .ooo 6.442 AA2 102.843 518,385.00 2.63 0660SOCW3 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/15/99 A+ 514,215.00 1.03 650,000.00 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC .ooo S.832 AA3 100.734 677,046.50 3.36 077858AA6 5.875% 02/01/2004 DD 02/01/94 A+ 654, 771. 00 1. 32 300,000.00 COLGATE PALMOLIVE MTN TR 00058 .ooo 5.270 AA3 100.000 308,808.00 1.53 19416QCK4 5.270% 12/01/2003 DD 11/24/98 AA-300,000.00 .60 1,350,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS SYSTE .ooo 5.364 AAA 100.670 1,399,963.50 6.97 31331B6G7 6.40% 01/23/2004 DD 01/01/1999 AAA 1,359,040.01 2.73 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB .ooo 3.713 AAA 101.003 1,125,905.00 5.70 3134A4PB1 3.750% 04/15/2004 DD 04/15/02 AAA 1,111,031.46 2.23 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS .ooo 5.082 AAA 100.848 4,350,168.00 21. 74 31359MEM1 5.125% 02/13/2004 DD 02/08/99 AAA 4,235,608.86 8.51 1,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN ITR 00545 .ooo 1.239 AAA 100.078 1,001,oeg.oo 5.13 36962GYS7 VAR RT 05/20/2004 DD 05/20/02 AAA 1,000,780.00 2.01 1,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS INC .ooo 6.509 Al 101.781 1,045,590.00 5.22 524908BZ2 6.625% 04/01/2004 DD 03/26/99 A 1,011,810.00 2.04 250,000.00 NCNB TEX NATL BK DALLAS TEX NT .ooo 9.143 AA2 103.906 260,870.00 1.33 628857DJO 9.500% 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/89 A+ 259,765.00 .52 YLDANAL OCSF07511102 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING YIELD ANALYSIS 2003/11/30 PAGE RUN DATE RUN TIME 3 12/04/03 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE \ TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 627,000.00 NATIONSBANK CORP SR NTS .ooo 5.954 AA2 102.875 646,650.18 3.31 6385858.17 6.125\ 07/15/2004 DD 07/23/98 A+ 645,026.25 1.30 s20,ooo.oo NORWEST FINL INC HTS .ooo 7.065 AAl 101.906 531,538.80 2. 71 669383DG3 7.200\ 04/01/2004 DD 04/07/97 AA-529, 911. 20 1.06 500,000.00 PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC NTS .ooo 6.450 AA2 100.000 519,405.00 2.56 695629CE3 6.450\ 12/01/2003 DD 12/01/98 AA+ 500,000.00 1.00 1,000,000.00 US BANCORP MTN ITR 00119 .ooo 5.879 AAJ 102.062 1,046, 310. 00 5.23 91159HEY2 6.000\ 05/15/2004 DD 05/10/99 A+ 1,020,620.00 2.05 s,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .ooo 5.635 AAA 104.250 5,226,367.19 26.75 9128275S7 05.875\ 11/15/2004 DD 11/15/99 AAA 5,212,500.00 10.47 -----------------------------------------TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES .ooo 5.225 19,803,585.17 100.00 19,482,402.78 39.12 -----------------------------------------TOTAL .ooo 2.139 50,105,364.47 100.00 49,784,182.08 100.00 ================= ========= YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE I 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME I 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YTJI AT CURRENT MOODY MARXET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARXET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 20,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .ooo .ooo P-1 99.731 20,744,004.66 23.87 313396RV7 MAT 01/15/2004 A-1+ 20,744,004.66 5.40 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .ooo .ooo P-1 99.727 1,196,718.67 1.37 313396SKO MAT 01/29/2004 A-1+ 1,196,718.67 .31 4,700,000.00 FEDERAL BOMB LN MTG CORP DISC .ooo .ooo P-1 99.661 4,684,085.28 5.39 ll3396SP9 MAT 02/02/2004 A-1+ 4,684,085.28 1.22 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .ooo .ooo P-1 99.724 2,493,100.00 2.86 313396SZ7 MAT 02/12/2004 A-1+ 2I493,100 .00 .65 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .ooo .ooo P-1 99.581 2,091,194.00 2.40 313396UQ4 MAT 03/22/2004 A-1+ 2,091,194.00 .54 200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC .ooo .ooo P-1 99.637 199,274.00 .22 313588QA6 A-1+ 199,274.00 .OS eoo,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .ooo .ooo P-1 99.663 797,301.63 .91 313588QN8 HAT 12/15/2003 A-1+ 797,301.63 .21 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT .ooo .ooo P-1 99. 715 2,393,155.61 2.75 313588TF2 A-1+ 2,393,155.61 .62 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .ooo .ooo P-1 99.553 3,783,014.00 4.35 313588TGO MAT 02/19/2004 A-1+ 3, 783,014 .oo .99 2,eoo,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .ooo .ooo P-1 99.658 2,790,420.11 3.21 36959JZA4 12/10/2003 2,790,420.11 • 73 4,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .ooo .ooo P-1 99.516 4,478,218.75 5.15 912795PK1 DUE 02/12/2004 DD 08/14/2003 A-1+ 4,478,218.75 1.17 17,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY BILL .ooo .ooo P-1 99.487 16,912,790.02 19.46 912795PV7 DUE 04/22/2004 DD 10/23/03 A-1+ 16,912,790.02 4.40 12,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .ooo .ooo P-1 99.484 11,938,120.00 13.73 912795PW5 0.000% 04/29/2004 DD 10/30/03 A-1+ 11,938,120.00 3.11 4,400,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .ooo .ooo P-1 99.482 4,377,207.88 5.03 912795PX3 0.000% 05/06/2004 DD 11/06/03 A-1+ 4,377,207.88 1.14 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE : 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YTPI AT CURRENT MOODY MARRET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARRET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4,eoo,ooo.oo FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO .ooo 1.020 100.000 4,eoo,000.00 S.52 99413F174 01.020% 12/01/2003 DD 11/28/03 4,800,000.00 1.25 3,214,872.14 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .ooo .812 AAA 100.000 3,214,872.14 3.69 996085247 AAA 31214 I 812 .14 • 84 -----------------------------------------TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS .ooo .017 86,893,476.75 100.00 86,893,476.75 22.63 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 752,000.00 AIG SUNAMERICA GLOBAL REG S .ooo 5.325 109.867 826,199.84 .27 U00907AAO 5.850% 08/01/2008 DD 08/08/01 826,199.84 .22 2,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG .ooo 5.839 AAA 102.750 2,552,812.50 .86 01F0606C4 6.000% 12/01/2033 DO 12/01/03 AAA 2,568,750.00 .67 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN I TR 00459 .ooo 1.470 Al 100.000 899,406.00 .30 073928VC4 VAR RT 12/01/2003 DO 08/17/01 A 900,000.00 .23 1,soo,000.00 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT .ooo 5.161 A2 106.578 1,527,135.00 .53 125581ADO 5.500% 11/30/2007 DD 12/02/02 A 1,598,670.00 .42 s,000,000.00 CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB NT .ooo 5.356 AA2 105.015 5,333 1 600.00 1. 76 172967BP5 5.625% 08/27/2012 DD 08/26/02 A+ 5,250,750.00 1.37 79,303.08 FBLHC GROUP fG4-0353 .ooo 7.325 AAA 102.383 81,310.45 .02 3128DBMA2 7.500% 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 AAA 81,192.67 .02 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DDS .ooo 6.690 AAA 106.504 7,997,625.00 2.68 3133MAUN7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 7,987,800.00 2.08 79,314.48 FBLHC GROUP 178-6064 .ooo 3.708 AAA 103.455 77,381.18 .02 31348SWZ3 6.384% 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97 AAA 82,055.11 .02 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS .ooo 4.928 AAA 106.541 11, 521, 271. 50 4.06 31359MJX2 5.250% 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AAA 12,092,459.12 3.15 859,012.21 FNMA POOL 10254510 .ooo 4.923 AAA 101. 570 884,782.58 .29 31371KVB4 5.000% 11/01/2017 DD 10/01/02 AAA 872,501.36 .23 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.38.34 ~============================================~=============================================================================== PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE \ TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 181,143.73 FNMA POOL 10254631 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 186,578.05 .06 31371I<Y47 5.000% 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03 AAA 183, 761. 82 .05 163,047.62 FNMA POOL 10254760 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 167,939.04 .OS 31371K5V9 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 165,404.16 .04 70,799.10 FNMA POOL 10254866 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 72,923.08 .02 31371LCB3 S.000% 09/01/2018 DD 08/01/03 AAA 71,822.37 .02 376,577.44 FNMA POOL f 0254953 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 381,402.34 .12 31371LE21 S.000% 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 382,020.15 .10 999,900.00 FNMA POOL f 0254987 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 1,012,711.21 .34 31371LF46 S.000\ 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 1,013,599.70 .26 219,336.47 FNMA POOL 10323980 .ooo S.725 AAA 104.797 229,000.99 .01 31374T2MO 6.000% 04/01/2014 DD 09/01/99 AAA 229,857.78 .06 33,182.54 FNMA POOL 10357328 .ooo 4.931 AAA 101.392 34,178.01 .01 31376J4M8 5.000% 01/01/2018 DD 01/01/03 AAA 33,644.59 .01 1,617,925.65 FNMA POOL 10357430 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 1,636,127.32 .ss 31376KA71 S.000% 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 AAA 1, 641, 309. 69 .43 73,773.50 FNMA POOL 10456482 .ooo 5.725 AAA 104.797 77,024.14 .02 31381CCT2 6.000\ 02/01/2014 DD 02/01/99 AAA 77,312.33 .02 177,993.22 FNMA POOL 10509649 .ooo 5.725 AAA 104.797 185,836.05 .06 31383QEWO 6.000% 09/01/2014 DD 09/01/99 AAA 186,531.34 .05 174,177.12 FNMA POOL 10535451 .ooo 5.725 AAA 104.797 181,851.80 .06 31384VZQ8 6.000\ 06/01/2015 DD 07/01/00 AAA 182, 532 .19 .05 3,766,954.11 FNMA POOL 10535672 .ooo 5.725 AAA 104.797 3,932,935.53 1.32 31384WCB1 6.000% 01/01/2016 DD 12/01/00 AAA l,947,650.38 1.03 1,252,717.66 FNMA POOL f 0545296 .ooo s. 728 AAA 104.747 1,307,915.53 .44 31385BXZO 6.000% 11/01/2016 DD 10/01/01 AAA 1,312,182.66 .34 105,717.20 FNMA POOL 10545580 .ooo 5.730 AAA 104.709 110,375.36 .OJ 31385JCR7 6.000% 03/01/2017 DD 03/01/02 AAA 110,695.81 .OJ 205,631.11 FNMA POOL 10545998 .ooo 5.843 AAA 102.691 213,856.35 .01 31385JRT7 6.000\ 11/01/2032 DD 10/01/02 AAA 211,164.79 .05 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YT.Pf AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 185,719.05 FNMA POOL f0555101 .ooo 5.723 AAA 104.847 193,902.28 .06 31385WU23 6.000% 10/01/2017 DD 11/01/02 AAA 194,720.61 .OS 830,446.27 FNMA POOL f 0555285 .ooo 5.832 AAA 102.887 863,664.13 .28 31385W2S7 6.000% 03/01/2033 DD 02/01/03 AAA 854,418.93 .22 391,033.62 FNMA POOL 10555363 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 402,764.63 .13 31385W5Yl 5.000% 04/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 AAA 396,685.27 .10 40, 046. 53 FNMA POOL 10555453 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 40,559.63 .01 31385XBW6 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 AAA 40,625.33 .01 802,440.91 FNMA POOL 10555528 .ooo 5.832 AAA 102.887 834,538.55 .27 31385XD95 6.000% 04/01/2033 DD 05/01/03 AAA 825,605.13 .21 325,949.32 FNMA POOL f 0555545 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 335,727.80 .11 31385XES2 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 330,660.30 .09 1,127,611.96 FNMA POOL 10555621 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 1,140,297.59 .38 ll385XG68 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 1,143,061.45 .30 .01 FNMA POOL 10555640 .ooo 5.832 AAA 102.887 .01 .oo 31385XHR1 6.000% 07/01/2033 DD 06/01/03 AAA .01 .oo 65,488.23 FNMA POOL 10576386 .ooo 5.753 AAA 104.301 68,373.80 .02 31386XJ72 6.000% 05/01/2016 DD 05/01/01 AAA 68,304.66 .02 180,265.76 FNMA POOL 10576739 .ooo 5.730 AAA 104.709 188,208.72 .06 31386XV86 6.000% 04/01/2016 DD 04/01/01 AAA 188,755.14 .OS 237,644.00 FNMA POOL f 0580888 .ooo 5.729 AAA 104.734 248,115.18 .08 31387DJ91 6.000% 05/01/2016 DD 05/01/01 AAA 248,894.97 .06 192,904.93 FNMA POOL 10594002 .ooo 5.739 AAA 104.547 201,404.80 .06 31387T3R8 6.000% 07/01/2016 DD 07/01/01 AAA 201,676.09 .OS 256,057.20 FNMA POOL 10597376 .ooo s.no AAA 104.709 267,339.72 .09 31387XT96 6.000% 09/01/2016 DD 08/01/01 AAA 268, 115. 88 .07 182 I 011•85 FNMA POOL 10605259 .ooo 5.730 AAA 104.709 190,038.01 .06 31388BHG1 6.000% 09/01/2016 DD 09/01/01 AAA 190,589.74 .os 108,368.85 FNMA POOL 10608366 .ooo 5.730 AAA 104.709 113,143.85 .03 31388LZ78 6.000% 10/01/2016 DD 09/01/01 AAA 113,472.34 .03 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME I 10.38.34 =======================================================================================~===================================== PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 171,282.81 FNMA POOL f0616734 • 000 5. 722 AAA 104.859 178,829.95 .06 31388WEF9 6.000% 12/01/2016 DD 12/01/01 AAA 179,606.09 .05 209,265.23 FNMA POOL f 0630812 .ooo 5.750 AAA 104 .341 218,485.98 .07 31389NYH2 6.000% 02/01/2017 DD 02/01/02 AAA 218,349.70 .06 868,744.72 FNMA POOL 10632376 .. ooo 5. 723 AAA 104.847 907,023.80 .30 31389QQSO 6.000% 07/01/2017 DD 07/01/02 AAA 910,851.65 .24 509,731.17 FNMA POOL 10653116 .. ooo 5.723 AAA 104.847 532,191.20 .17 31390QSD8 6.000% 07/01/2017 DD 07/01/02 AAA 534,437.18 .14 208, 854 .17 FNMA POOL f 0673280 .ooo 5.739 AAA 104.547 218,056.80 .07 31391P6R2 6.000% 08/01/2017 DD 11/01/02 AAA 218,350.52 .06 584 ,844 .19 FNMA POOL f 0681309 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 602,389.51 .19 31391Y3S4 5.000% 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03 AAA 593,297.00 .15 73,753.38 FNMA POOL f0681334 .000 4.929 AAA 101. 445 75,965.98 .02 31391Y4Tl 5.000% 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03 AAA 74,819.34 .02 355,998.83 FNMA POOL f 0684908 .ooo 4.924 AAA 101.545 360,560.07 .12 31400D3Rl 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 361,500.12 .09 209,789.66 FNMA POOL 10685200 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 212,477.59 .07 31400EGB7 5.000% 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 AAA 212,821. 77 .06 37,366.96 FNMA POOL f 0685665 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 38,487.97 .01 31400EW22 5.000% 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03 AAA 37,907.03 .01 322,316.29 FNMA POOL 10686318 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 331,985.78 .11 31400FPB7 5.000% 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 AAA 326,974.76 .09 124,553.20 FNMA POOL f 0688739 .000 4.929 AAA 101. 445 128,289.79 .04 31400JEL9 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 126,353.38 .03 138,272.05 FNMA POOL f 0689859 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 140,043.66 .04 31400KMG8 S.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 140,270.51 .04 762,067.34 FNMA POOL 10693834 .ooo 4.923 AAA 101.570 784,929.36 .26 31400PY74 5.000% 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 AAA 774,034.16 .20 279,876.09 FNMA POOL f 0695852 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 288,272.37 .09 31400SBVO 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 283,921.17 .07 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUH TIME l 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YT'H AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 850,345.21 FNMA POOL 10695889 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 875,855.56 .29 31400SC23 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 862,635.33 .22 27 I 680.19 FNMA POOL f 0697026 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 28,510.61 .oo 31400TLF2 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 AAA 28,080.25 .01 92,437.07 FNMA POOL 10698939 .ooo 5.715 AAA 104.984 96,510.08 .03 31400VPY2 6.000% 09/01/2017 DD 03/01/03 AAA 97,044.48 .03 284,613.18 FNMA POOL 10702210 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 293,151.58 .09 31401ADP9 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 288,512.69 .08 151,690.63 FNMA POOL 10702328 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 153,634.17 .05 31401ABD2 5.000\ 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 AAA 153,883.03 .04 83,209.15 FNMA POOL 10703195 .ooo 5. 715 AAA 104.984 86,875.56 .02 31401BGC3 6.000% 01/01/2017 DD 04/01/03 AAA 87,356.61 .02 305, 196. 38 FNMA POOL 10709148 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 314,352.27 .10 31401BZM7 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 309,607.41 .08 701,877.24 FNMA POOL 10709360 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 710,870.04 .23 31401JB56 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 712,021.54 .19 146,432.69 FNMA POOL 10709826 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 148,308.86 .04 31401JSP4 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 148, 549 .10 .04 268,422.86 FNMA POOL 10709917 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 271,862.03 .09 31401JVJ4 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 272,302.40 .07 27,274.00 FNMA POOL 10709963 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 27,623.45 .oo 31401JWYO 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 27,647.68 .01 818,490.37 FNMA POOL 10710235 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 843,045.09 .27 31401KBCB 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 830,320.09 .22 26,493.87 FNMA POOL 10713344 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 27,288.68 .oo 31401NP52 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 26,876.79 .01 342,541.64 FNMA POOL 10713365 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 346,930.45 .11 31401NQS1 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 AAA 347,492.43 .09 999,999.37 FNMA POOL 10720319 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 1,012,811.86 .34 31401WG45 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 AAA 1,014,452.46 .26 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 10 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY MARlCET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARlCET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2,487,120.37 FNMA POOL f 0720369 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101. 370 2,561,733.98 .84 31401WJNO S.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 2,521,196.58 .66 319,195.88 FNMA POOL 10721629 .ooo 4.923 AAA 101. 570 328, 771. 77 .10 31401XVW4 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 324,208.24 .08 254, 163.98 FNMA POOL 10723487 .ooo 4 .929 AAA 101.445 257,023.32 .08 31402AXQ4 S.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 257,837.44 .07 439,182.56 FNMA POOL 10729601 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 444, 809. 59 .14 31402HRW3 S.000% 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 AAA 445,530.11 .12 36,719.15 FNMA POOL 10732873 .ooo 4.918 AAA 101.670 37,189.61 .01 31402MFNS S.000% 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 37,332.47 .01 754,718.01 FNMA POOL 10737130 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 764,387.83 .25 31402S4P9 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 765,626.02 .20 595,259.77 FNMA POOL 10738211 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 602,886.54 .20 31402UDQ2 S.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 603,415.47 .16 228, 081.28 FNMA POOL 10738487 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 231,003.57 .07 31402UNC2 s.ooot 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 231,377.76 .06 790,309.70 FNMA POOL 10740471 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 800,435.54 .26 31402WT40 5.ooot 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 AAA 801,137.79 .21 834,454.00 FNMA POOL 10740748 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 845,145.44 .28 31402WSH7 s.ooot 10/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 846,514.45 .22 1,189,028.27 FNMA POOL 10744008 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 1,204,262.69 .40 31403BR54 s.ooot 07/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 AAA 1,206,213.41 .31 176,746.71 FNMA POOL 10744316 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 179,011.28 .06 31403B3Z4 S.000% 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 AAA 179,168.33 .OS 364,580.00 FNMA POOL 10747914 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101.445 369,251.18 .12 31403F3XO 5.ooot 11/011201e DD 11/01/03 AAA 369,849.31 .10 245,282.02 FNMA POOL 10748400 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 248,424.70 .08 31403GNR9 5.000% 08/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 AAA 248,642.65 .06 1,042,469.00 FNMA POOL 10748899 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 1 1 055 1 825.63 .35 31403G7LO 5.ooot 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 1,056,756.03 .28 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERH OPERATING RUN TIME 10.38.34 ===;=============~=========================================================================================================== PAR VALUE YT'H AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE t TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2,575,784.00 FNMA POOL 10750377 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 2,608,786.23 .87 31403JUA2 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 2,611,085.09 .68 2,146,534.00 FNMA POOL 10750380 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101. 370 2,174,036.48 .73 ll403JUD6 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 2,175,952.23 .57 194,967.00 FNMA POOL 10750445 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101.370 197, 465. 01 .06 31403JWE2 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 197,639.02 .OS 917, 585.00 FNMA POOL 10751960 .ooo 4.932 AAA 101. 370 929,341.56 .31 31403LHH1 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 930,156.90 .24 999,900.00 FNMA POOL f 0753425 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 1,011,461.34 .34 31403NA23 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 1,014,351.65 .26 663,384.00 FNMA POOL 10755165 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 671,883.60 .22 31403Q6A3 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 672,971.96 .18 999,900.00 FNMA POOL 10756372 .ooo 4.929 AAA 101. 445 1,011,461.34 .34 31403SJR8 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 1,014,351.65 .26 45,596.00 FNMA POOL 10765165 .ooo 4.937 AAA 101. 281 46,180.20 .01 31404DCA4 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 AAA 46,180.20 .01 384,843.74 GNMA POOL 10596612 .ooo 6.172 AAA 105. 316 403,905.53 .13 36200BYH4 6.500% 09/15/2032 DD 09/01/02 AAA 405,303.61 .11 1,295,429.22 GNMA POOL f 0569358 .ooo 6.189 AAA 105.031 1,325,790.84 .45 36200QQK3 6.500% 04/15/2032 DD 04/01/02 AAA 1,360,603.64 .35 56,586.26 GNMA POOL 10569685 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 59,389.04 .02 36200Q2S2 6.500% 02/15/2032 DD 02/01/02 AAA 59,612.30 .02 94,336.15 GNMA POOL 10570019 .ooo 6.172 AAA 105.316 99,008.74 .03 36200RG48 6.500% 07/15/2032 DD 07/01/02 AAA 99,351.45 .03 601,564.03 GNMA POOL 10574323 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 631,360.25 .21 36200WAY7 6.500% 12/15/2031 DD 12/01/01 AAA 633,733.63 .17 60,775.18 GNMA POOL 10575364 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 63,785.45 .02 36200XFD6 6.500% 11/15/2031 DD 11/01/01 AAA 64,025.23 .02 23,172.59 GNMA POOL 10587117 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 24,320.36 .oo 36201MG22 6.500% 06/15/2032 DD 06/01/02 AAA 24,411.78 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 12 OCSF07S22202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY .MARI<ET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 68,561.41 GNMA POOL 10587439 .ooo 6.172 AAA 105.316 71,957.34 .02 36201HS45 6.500% 11/15/2032 DD 12/01/02 AAA 72,206.42 .02 15,463.38 GNMA POOL 10421389 .ooo 6.150 AAA 105.691 16,229.31 .oo 36206UC23 6.500% 04/15/2026 DD 04/01/96 AAA 16,343.46 .oo 25,013.02 GNMA POOL 10449851 .ooo 6.184 AAA 105.105 26, 251. 95 .oo 36208FWLO 6.500% 01/15/2028 DD 01/01/98 AAA 26,289.94 .01 74,805.81 GNMA POOL 10466845 .ooo 6.157 AAA 105.566 78,511.03 .02 36209BTA6 6.500% 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98 AAA 78,969.81 .02 261,418.89 GNMA POOL 10468052 .ooo 6.157 AAA 105.566 274,367.29 .09 36209C5M4 6.500% 07/15/2028 DD 07/01/98 AAA 275,970.54 .07 224,632.54 GNMA POOL 10476041 .ooo 6.157 AAA 105.566 235,407.88 .07 36209MZE7 6.500% 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98 AAA 237,136.51 .06 179,185.86 GNMA POOL 10478626 .ooo 6.163 AAA 105.473 187, 781.18 .06 36209QVT9 6.500% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 188,992.09 .05 214,424.53 GNMA POOL 10480598 .ooo 6.163 AAA 105.473 224,710.22 .07 36209S3F6 6.500% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 226,159.26 .06 488,829.75 GNMA POOL f 0485527 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 513,042.10 .17 36209YLG1 6.500% 06/15/2031 DD 06/01/01 AAA 514,970.70 .13 539,528.92 GNMA POOL 10485610 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 566,252.46 .u 36209YN38 6.500% 07/15/2031 DD 07/01/01 AAA 568,381.09 .15 111,928.03 GNMA POOL 10485682 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 117,471.97 .03 36209YRB6 6.500% 08/15/2031 DD 08/01/01 AAA 117,913.56 .03 113,450.46 GNMA POOL 10485703 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 119,069.81 .04 36209YRY6 6.500% 08/15/2031 DD 08/01/01 AAA 119,517.40 .03 10,948.76 GNMA POOL 10512235 .ooo 6.166 AAA 105 .410 11,491.06 .oo 36211GBC6 6.500% 11/15/2029 DD 11/01/99 AAA 11,541.11 .oo 178,962.07 GNMA POOL 10514326 .ooo 6.163 AAA 105.473 187,546.65 .06 J6211JLF2 6.500% 07/15/2029 DD 07/01/99 AAA 188,756.06 .OS 54,734.82 GNMA POOL 10530053 .ooo 6.190 AAA 105.004 57,445.91 .01 J6212CZS3 6.500% 04/15/2031 DD 04/01/01 AAA 57,473.94 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 13 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.38.34 ==========================================================================================~====~===========================~= PAR VALUE YT'M AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 69,041.37 GNMA POOL 10530290 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 72,353.20 .02 36212DC31 6.500% 03/15/2031 DD 04/01/01 AAA 72,733.47 .02 119, 191. 36 GNMA POOL 10537885 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 125,095.05 .04 36212MR.El 6.500% 02/15/2031 DD 02/01/01 AAA 125,565.31 .03 13,388.28 GNMA POOL f0547512 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 14,051.42 .oo 36212YGV9 6.500% 04/15/2031 DD 04/01/01 AAA 14,104.24 .oo 128,502.45 GNMA POOL 10547715 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 134,666.55 .04 36212YN82 6.500% 02/15/2031 DD 02/01/01 AAA 135,374.32 .04 82, 681.10 GNMA POOL 10552322 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 86,776.40 .02 36213ESK3 6.500% 01/15/2032 DD 01/01/02 AAA 87,102.60 .02 628,016.99 GNMA POOL 10552466 .ooo 6.189 AAA 105.031 659,123.46 .22 36213EW36 6.500% 03/15/2032 DD 03/01/02 AAA 659,613.19 .17 476,472.18 GNMA POOL 10552659 .ooo 6.172 AAA 105.316 500,072.43 .16 36213E5U6 6.500% 07/15/2032 DD 07/01/02 AAA 501,803.39 .13 464,148.58 GNMA POOL 10561017 .ooo 6.170 AAA 105.348 487,138.44 .16 36213QG29 6.500% 07/15/2031 DD 07/01/0l AAA 488,969.67 .13 284,976.24 GNMA II POOL 10080395 .ooo 3.470 AAA 100.871 282,393.64 .09 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 287,457.67 .07 2,565,793.89 GNMA II POOL f 080408X .ooo 3.472 AAA 100.818 2,539,735.04 .87 36225CN28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 2,586,785.93 .67 5,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN fTR 00575 .ooo 5.273 AAA 103.359 5 1 203,500.00 l. 73 36962GZY3 5.450\ 01/15/2013 DD 12/06/02 AAA 5,167,950.00 1.35 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR NT .ooo 5.792 Al 105.750 3,064,350.00 1.06 370425SD3 6.125% 08/28/2007 DD 08/29/02 BBB 3,172,500.00 .83 3,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC SR NT .ooo 4 .049 AA3 101.875 3,030,030.00 1.02 38141GCS1 4.125% 01/15/2008 DD 01/13/03 A+ 3,056,250.00 .80 1,635,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT .ooo 5.819 Al 109.546 i,112,920.00 .60 441812JWS 6.375% 10/15/2011 DD 10/23/0l A 1,791,077.10 .47 3,000,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO SUB NT .ooo 5.494 A2 104.656 3,127,260.00 1.05 46625HAT7 5.750% 01/02/2013 DD 11/25/02 A 3,139,680.00 .82 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 14 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3,200,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY NT .ooo 3.653 AA3 99.234 3,195,648.00 1.06 617446HW2 3.625% 04/01/2008 DD 03/06/03 A+ 3,175,488.00 .83 3,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL UTILS COOP FIN .ooo 6.263 A2 115. 765 3,465,480.00 1.16 637432CU7 7.250% 03/01/2012 DD 03/07/02 A 3,472,950.00 .90 1,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS .ooo 7.382 BAA2 101. 593 1,052,600.00 .34 718154CH8 7.500% 04/01/2004 DD 04/01/97 BBB 1,015,930.00 .26 3,497,276.28 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 .ooo 5.881 AAA 107.800 3,497,276.28 1.26 83162CL.JO 6.340% 03/01/2021 AAA 3,770,063.83 .98 2,425,788.58 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .ooo 6.211 AAA 106.905 2,425,788.58 .87 831641DD4 6.640% 02/10/2011 DD 02/21/01 NR 2,593,289.28 .68 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1 c .ooo 45.319 CA 15.073 1,600,000.00 .oe 909317BC2 6.831% 03/01/2010 DD 08/22/01 A-241,168.00 .06 20,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .ooo S.624 AAA 111.125 22,620,312.50 7.47 9128272JO 06.250% 02/15/2007 DD 02/15/97 AAA 22,225,000.00 5.79 3,438,720.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .ooo 3.273 AAA 110.750 J,749,689.0S 1.28 912827JT7 3.625% 01/15/2008 DD 01/15/98 AAA 3,808,382.40 .99 14,678,950.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .ooo 3.450 AAA 112.313 16,312,018.79 5.54 9128274Y5 3.875% 01/15/2009 DD 01/15/99 AAA 16,486,295.72 4.29 57,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .ooo 5.363 AAA 107.219 62, 782,901.47 20.60 9128276N7 05.750% 11/15/2005 DD 11/15/00 AAA 61,222,049.00 15.94 12,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NT .ooo 3.254 AAA 99.870 11,870,156.25 4.03 912828BG4 3.250% 08/15/2008 DD 08/15/03 AAA 11,984,400.00 3.12 3,000,000.00 VERIZON GLOBAL FOO CORP GLOBAL .ooo 6.437 A2 114. 578 3,530,490.00 1.15 92344GAT3 7.375% 09/01/2012 DD 08/26/02 A+ 3,437,340.00 .90 1,750,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC & PWR 01 SER A .ooo 5.390 A3 106.687 1,743,840.00 .62 927804ENO 5.750% 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01 BBB+ 1,867,022.50 .49 16,363,200.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3 .817 3.110 AAA 108. 516 14,436,173.87 5.97 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 AAA 17,756,627.93 4.62 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 5.967 6.688 AAA 106.537 16,154,410.00 5.55 31359MFH1 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/14/00 AAA 16,513,213.30 4.30 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 15 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YT'H AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1,125,040.99 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER El A 6 .316 3.895 AAA 99.279 1,126,239.59 .37 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97 AAA 1,116,929.44 .29 752,686.77 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 6 .320 1.610 AAA 100.591 752,686.77 .25 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 757,135.15 .20 8,794.89 GNMA POOL 10500917 6. 389 5. 778 AAA 103.840 8,348.27 .oo 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 9,132.60 .oo 37,519.85 GNMA POOL 10506636 6 .389 5.778 AAA 103.840 35,614.54 .01 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 38,960.55 .01 340,345.55 GNMA POOL f 0503388 6 .389 5.778 AAA 103.840 323,062.38 .11 36210VF55 6.000% 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99 AAA 353, 414. 27 .09 12,687.38 GNMA POOL 10499153 6 .389 5. 778 AAA 103.840 12,043.10 .oo 36210QQE5 6.000% 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 13, 174. 56 .oo 452,391.15 GNMA POOL 10496461 6 .390 5. 778 AAA 103.840 429,418.15 .15 36210MQN4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 469,762.25 .12 112,382.86 GNMA POOL 10491103 6 .390 5. 778 AAA 103.840 106,675.93 .03 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 116, 698 .18 .03 12,311.13 GNMA POOL 10486720 6 .390 5.778 AAA 103.840 11,685.96 .oo 36210AVM6 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AAA 12,783.86 .oo 25,430.32 GNMA POOL 10497343 6 .390 5.778 AAA 103.840 24,138.94 .oo 36210NP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AAA 26,406.80 .01 16,463.83 GNMA POOL 10469688 6. 391 5. 778 AAA 103.840 15,627.77 .oo 36209EXR8 6.000% 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/98 AAA 17,096.0l .oo 22,880.14 GNMA POOL 10467279 6 .391 5. 778 AAA 103.840 21,718.26 .oo 36209CCQ7 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 23,758.70 .01 39,609.54 GNMA POOL 10457814 6 .391 5.778 AAA 103.840 37,598.11 .01 36208QSB3 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 41,130.48 .01 398,623.07 GNMA POOL 10467286 6. 391 5. 778 AAA 103.840 378,380.49 .13 36209CCX2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 413, 929. 56 .11 518,609.33 GNMA POOL 10465555 6. 392 5. 778 AAA 103.840 492,273.71 .18 36209AE48 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 538,523.10 .14 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 16 OCSF07522202 2003/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME a 10.38.34 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YT'H AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13,209.99 GNMA POOL 10483452 6 .392 5. 778 AAA 103.840 12,539.18 .oo 36209WBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 13,717.23 .oo 480,176.9l GNMA POOL 10465546 6 .392 5.778 AAA 103.840 455,792.95 .16 l6209AETl 6.000% 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98 AAA 498,614.96 .13 40l,800.00 GNMA POOL I0468l39 6 .392 5.778 AAA 103.840 l83,294.55 .14 36209DBQO 6.000% 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98 AAA 419,305.27 .11 29,424.36 GNMA POOL f 0438057 6 .393 5. 778 AAA 103.840 27 ,930.17 .01 l6207PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 30,554.21 .01 18,908.13 GNHA POOL 10468330 6 .393 5. 778 AAA 103.840 17,947.94 .oo 36209DBF4 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 19,634.17 .01 3,002,004.61 FBLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 6 .499 5.736 AAA 104.599 2,845,864.67 1.05 3133T17A4 ·6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 3 I 140 I 066 • 80 .82 344,021.95 GNMA II POOL I080088M 6.705 4.309 AAA 101.525 351,547.43 .11 36225CC20 7.375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 AAA 349,268.63 .09 2,000,000.00 HARSH & MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6 .717 6.450 A2 102.718 1,992,280.00 .69 571748AB8 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 AA-2,054,360.00 .53 2,soo,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6. 7l9 6.522 Al 102.734 2,495,900.00 .86 345397SJl 6.700% 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 BBB-2,568,350.00 .67 2,soo,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LHS INC NT 6 .866 6.662 Al 102.828 2,498,400.00 .86 22237UAB8 6.850% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2,570,700.00 .67 237,974.44 GNMA II POOL 10080023 6 .992 5.483 AAA 102.583 241,915.89 .08 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 244,121.03 .06 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 7 .113 5.8l9 AAA 113.470 2,030,133.00 .80 31359MEY5 6.625\ 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 AAA 2,382,880.29 .62 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 7 .582 6.454 Al 104.593 965,170.00 .l5 l45l97GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93 BBB-1,045,930.00 .27 946,689.51 WMP/BUNTOON PAIGE 1000-11150 7 .684 7.327 AAA 102.363 .926,128.61 .32 l02998GEl 7.500\ 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 969,061.01 .25 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN fTR 00115 7. 709 6.970 Al 104.734 2,950,530.00 1.05 69512EEU5 7.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A l, 142,020.00 .82 YLDANAL OCSF07522202 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING YIELD ANALYSIS 2003/11/30 PAGE RUN DATE RUN TIME 17 12/04/03 I 10.38.34 ========================================================:==================================================================== PAR VALUE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION l,600 1 000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 020002ALS 7.875% 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES TOTAL YTH AT BOOK ---·---- 7 .967 ----·---- .372 -------- .358 CURRENT MOODY YIELD S-P -------------- 7.290 Al A+ ------- S.226 ------- 5.029 MARKET TOTAL COST/ ' TYPE PRICE MARKET VALUE ' TOTAL ------------------------------ 108.031 1,594,032.00 .58 1,728,496.00 .45 --------------------------293, 752,821.23 100.00 297,162,990.63 77.41 --------------------------380,646,297.98 100.00 384,056,467.38 100.00 ================= ========= c:OU™mD-OC~OOlOO:~--:~:::---:_:_:~ ____ £:~::~~~:- ---··-----· Cost Base Report ID: GL8013°'- Base Currency: USD Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL Market Value Base ----- % of Total Net Unrealized Gain/Loss Base I Descripti_o_n ________ Pri~~------B_a_s_e ____ ~_h_ar!~-~ar ___ _ --. -------------·---------------- U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS INTEREST RECEIVABLE RECEIVABLE FOR INVESTMENTS SOLD PAYABLE FOR INVESTMENTS PURCHASED DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC12/17 /2003SEC ID: 26354BZH8 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISCSEC ID: 313384SS9 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISCMAT 02/09/2004SEC ID: 313384SWO FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISCMAT 02/25/2004SEC ID: 313384TN9 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CINS DISCMAT 03/ 17 /2004SEC ID: 313384UK3 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISCMAT 05/19/2004SEC ID: 313384XA2 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISCMAT 01/15/2004SEC ID: 313396RV7 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISCMAT Ol/29/2004SEC ID: 313396SKO FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISCMAT 02/02/2004SEC ID: 313396SP9 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISCMAT 02/ 12/2004SEC ID: 313396SZ7 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISCMAT 02/26/2004SEC ID: 313396TP8 99.9008 99.6879 99.6136 99.7321 99.4625 99.4313 99.7308 99.7266 99.6614 99.7240 99.7313 3,436,319.59 42,448.06 -2,801,816.34 1,000,000.000 999,008.33 1,400,000.000 1,395,630.83 600,000.000 597,681.67 2,I000,000.000 1,994,641.11 900,000.000 895,162.50 2,000,000.000 1,988,625.00 20,800,000.000 20,744,004.66 l ,200,0•00.000 1,196,718.67 4,700,000.000 4,684,085.28 2,.500,000.000 2,493,100.00 3,r000,0·00.000 2,991,937.50 -------------·---------·-~----·--··-··--·-·-· ·------·--·-----·---·~- 1 3,436,319.59 0.79% 0.00 42,448.06 0.01% 0.00 -2,801,816.34 -0.64% 0.00 999,008.33 0.23% 0.00 1,395,630.83 0.32% 0.00 597,681.67 0.14% 0.00 1,994,641.11 0.46% 0.00 895,162.50 0.21% 0.00 1,988,625.00 0.46% 0.00 20,744,004.66 4.77% 0.00 1,196,718.67 0.28% 0.00 4 ,684 ,085.28 1.08% 0.00 2,493,100.00 0.57% 0.00 2,991,937.50 0.69% 0.00 Workbench ------------·------· -----·---·---------------~-----------------·- Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSJ).CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 Status: FINAL ----------·-· ---------··---------·-··· ------------ Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base ·-· ---· ----------·--·---- FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.5807 2, 100,0-00.000 2,091,194.00 2,091,194.00 0.48% o_oo DISCMAT 03/22/2004SEC ID: 313396UQ4 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.4225 3,800,0·00.000 3,778,055.00 3,778,055.00 0.87% 0.00 DISCMAT 03/31/2004SEC ID: 313396UZ4 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCSEC 99.6370 200,0·00.000 199,274.00 199,274.00 0.05% 0.00 ID: 313588QA6 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.6627 800,0·00.000 797,301.63 797,301.63 0.18% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 12/ 15/2003SEC ID: 313588QN8 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 99.7535 5, 400,0·00.000 5,385,761.72 5,385,761.72 1.24% 0.00 NTSECID:313588TF2 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.5530 3. 800 ,0·00. 000 3,783,014.00 3,783,014.00 0.87% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 02/19/2004SEC ID:313588TGO FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.4262 2, 000,000.000 1,988,523.89 1,988,523.89 0.46% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT OS/ l 9/2004SEC ID:313588XA8 GENERAL ELEC CAP 99.6579 2, 800,()00.000 2,790,420.11 2,790,420.11 0.64% 0.00 DISC12/ 10/2003SEC ID: 36959JZA4 U S TREASURY BILLDUE 99.5160 5, 700,0·00.000 5,672,410.42 5,672,410.42 1.31% 0.00 02/12/2004 DD 08/14/2003SEC ID:912795PK1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 99.4870 17 I 000,000.000 16,912,790.02 16,912,790.02 3.89% 0.00 BILLDUE 04 /22/2004 DD 10/23/03SECID:912795PV7 U S TREASURY BILL 0.000% 99.4843 12,000,C>OO.OOO 11,938,120.00 11,938,120.00 2.75% 0.00 04/29/2004 DD 10/30/03SEC ID: 912795PW5 U S TREASURY BILL 0.000% 99.4820 4, 400,C>00.000 4 ,377 ,207 .88 4,377,207.88 1.01% 0.00 05/06/2004DDl1/06/03SEC ID: 912795PX3 U S TREASURY BILLDUE 99.4893 4. 300,000.000 4,278,040.68 4,278,040.68 0.98% 0.00 05/27 /2004 DD 11/28/2003SEC ID: 912795QA2 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPOO 1.020% 100.0000 9. 800,000.000 9,800,000.00 9 ,800 ,000.00 2.26% 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 11/28/03SEC ID: 99413Fl74 -------··---- 2 Workbench . " ----------------------------------------. ·------------- Asset Detail by Currency Report ID: GL8013 • Base Currency: USD Alternate Base Currency: OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO ___ } _l_/3_0[~0_0_3 _____________ _ Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL ---- Net Unrealized Cost Market Value -------------- 1 Price !~_D_e_s_c_ri_p_t_i_o_n ________________ Bas_~------Shares Par Base Base --···-~----·--~~-·----------------- % of Gain/Loss Total Base DREYFUS TREASURY CASH 100.0000 3,422,547.150 3,422,547.15 3,422,547.15 0.79% 0.00 MGMTSEC ID: 99608524 7 TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 117 ,622,547 .150 117,872,207.36 117,872,207.36 27.13% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES AIG SUNAMERICA GLOBAL REG S 5. 109.8670 752,000.000 826,199.84 826,199.84 0.19% 0.00 850% 08/01/2008 DD 08/08/01SECID:U00907AAO COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6. 102.7500 2 ,.500,000.000 2,552,812.50 2,568,750.00 0.59% 15,937.50 000% 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SECID:OlF0606C4 ALLSTATE CORP SR N17.875% 108.0310 1,1600,0•00.000 1,594,032.00 1, 728,496.00 0.40% 134,464.00 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00SEC ID: 020002AL5 ASSOCIATES CORP NA MTN 103.9840 100,0-00.000 104,199.00 103,984.00 0.02% -215.00 SR00043 7. 920% 07/13 /2004 DD 07/13/94SECID:045906BU7 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH AMER5. 101.7340 l ,c000,0·00.000 1,041,290.00 1,017,340.00 0.23% -23,950.00 800% 04 /20 /2004 DD 04/20/99SECID:046003KA6 BANK OF AMERICA CORP SR GBL 102.8430 :500,0100.000 518,385.00 514,215.00 0.12% -4,170.00 NT6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/15/99SEC ID: 066050CW3 BEAR STEARNS MTN # TR 100.0000 900,000.000 899,406.00 900,000.00 0.21% 594.00 00459VAR RT 12/01/2003 DD 08/17/01SECID:073928VC4 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC5. 100.7340 650,000.000 677,046.50 654,771.00 0.15% -22,275.50 875% 02/01/2004 DD 02/0l/94SECID:077858AA6 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT 5.500% 106.5780 1,.500,0-00.000 1,527,135.00 1,598,670.00 0.37% 71,535.00 11/30/2007 DD 12/02/02SEC ID: 125581ADO CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB NT5. 105.0150 5 ,1000 ,o·oo .ooo 5,333,600.00 5,250,750.00 1.21% -82,850.00 625% 08/27 /2012 DD 08/26/02SECID: 172967BP5 COLGATE PALMOLIVE MTN TR 100.0000 .'300,0-00.000 308,808.00 300,000.00 0.07% -8,808.00 000585.270% 12/01/2003 DD ll/24/98SECID: 19416QCK4 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LNS INC NT6. 102.8280 2 ,.500,0·00. 000 2,498,400.00 2,570,700.00 0.59% 72,300.00 850% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99SECID:22237UAB8 --------------------- 3 Workbench ·----~----···-·---· -·--. ----··----·- Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLlDATED • OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 Status: FINAL --····-····· .. -----·---··--·-·-------·-------------··----··-· -·-·- Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base ----·--- WMP /HUNTOON PAIGE #000-102.3631 '946,6-89.510 926,128.61 969,061.01 0.22% 42,932.40 111507.500% 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99SECID:302998GE3 FHLMC GROUP #G4-0353 7.500% 102.3828 79,303.080 81,310.45 81,192.67 0.02% -117.78 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99SEC ID: 3128DBMA2 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS7. 106.5040 7' 500,0·00.000 7,997 ,625.00 7,987,800.00 1.84% -9,825.00 125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00SECID:3133MAUN7 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 99.2790 1, 125,0-40.990 1,126,239.59 1, 116 '929. 44 0.26% -9,310.15 AVAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/0l/97SECID:3133TCE95 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 104.5990 3,·002,0·04.610 2,845,864.67 3,140,066.80 0.72% 294,202.13 1620Z6.000% 11/15/2023 DD ll/Ol/93SECID:3133Tl7A4 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS 100.6696 1,.350,0·00.000 1,399,963.50 1,359,040.01 0.31% -40,923.49 SYSTE6.40% 01 /23 /2004 DD 01/01/1999SECID:31331H6G7 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 101.0029 1, 100,0·00.000 1, 125,905.00 1,111,031.46 0.26% -14,873.54 3.750% 04/15/2004 DD 04/15/02SECID:3134A4PH1 FHLMC GROUP #78-6064 6.384% 103.4554 79,314.480 77,381.18 82,055.11 0.02% 4,673.93 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97SEC ID: 31348SWZ3 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS5. 100.8478 4,200,0·00.000 4,350,168.00 4,235,608.86 0.97% -114,559.14 125% 02/13/2004 DD 02/08/99SEC ID: 31359MEM1 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS6. 113.4705 2, 100,0·00.000 2,030,133.00 2,382,880.29 0.55% 352,747.29 625% 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99SEC ID: 31359MEY5 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS7. 106.5369 15,.500,0•00.000 16,154,410.00 16,513,213.30 3.80% 358,803.30 125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/14/00SEC ID: 31359MFH1 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBSS. 106.5415 11,.350,0·00.000 11,521,271.50 12,092,459.12 2.78% 571,187.62 250% 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01SECID:31359MJX2 FNMA POOL #0254510 5.000% 101.5703 859,012.210 884,782.58 872,501.36 0.20% -12,281.22 11/01/2017 DD 10/01/02SEC ID: 31371KVB4 -------·-·-·-··· ···---··--·----· -·· --·· -·-'····---------------- 4 Workbench --------------------------·-. ··-·--·----··---------. -· ·-------·- Asset Detail Report ID: GU013] Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 Status: FINAL ----·--·-··-----------·. ----------·----· --·--------------·-------------------- Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base --------·---·-----·-----·- FNMA POOL #0254631 5.000% 101.4453 181,143.730 186,578.05 183,761.82 0.04% -2,816.23 02/01/2018 DD 01/0l/03SEC ID: 31371KY47 FNMA POOL #0254760 5.000% 101.4453 163,047.620 167,939.04 165,404.16 0.04% -2,534.88 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31371K5V9 FNMA POOL #0254866 5.000% 101.4453 70,799.100 72,923.08 71,822.37 0.02% -1,100.71 09/01/2018 DD 08/01/03SEC ID: 31371LCB3 FNMA POOL #0254953 5.000% 101.4453 376,577.440 381,402.34 382,020.15 0.09% 617.81 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31371LE21 FNMA POOL #0254987 5.000% 101.3701 ·999,9·00.000 1,012,711.21 1,013,599.70 0.23% 888.49 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31371LF46 FNMA POOL #0323980 6.000% 104.7969 219,336.470 229,000.99 229,857.78 0.05% 856.79 04/01/2014 DD 09/01/99SEC ID: 31374T2MO FNMA POOL #0357328 5.000% 101.3925 33,182.540 34,l 78.01 33,644.59 0.01% -533.42 01/01/2018 DD 01/01/03SEC ID: 31376J4M8 FNMA POOL #0357430 5.000% 101.4453 l,~17,925.650 1,636, 127 .32 1,641,309.69 0.38% 5,182.37 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31376KA71 FNMA POOL #0456482 6.000% 104.7969 73,773.500 77,024.14 77,312.33 0.02% 288.19 02/01/2014 DD 02/0l/99SEC ID: 31381CCT2 FNMA POOL #0509649 6.000% 104.7969 177,9•93.220 185,836.05 186,531.34 0.04% 695.29 09/01/2014 DD 09/01/99SEC ID: 31383QEWO FNMA POOL #0535451 6.000% 104.7969 174,177.120 181,851.80 182,532.19 0.04% 680.39 06/01/2015 DD 07 /01/00SEC ID: 31384VZQ8 FNMA POOL #0535672 6.000% 104.7969 3, 766,954.110 3,932,935.53 3,947,650.38 0.91% 14,714.85 01/01/2016 DD 12/01/00SEC ID: 31384WCH1 FNMA POOL #0545296 6.000% 104.7469 1,252,717.660 1,307,915.53 1,312,182.66 0.30% 4,267.13 11/01/2016 DD 10/01/0lSEC ID: 31385HXZO 5 Workbench -..... _____ -··· ---· ---·----·-------. ···--··-· ··---·-···-... ·----------·-----·-----·----l Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: I Exchange Rate: OCSJ).CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 Status: FINAL -------···-... -·-·-· I Description ---------------·----------------·-·~·--------· Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base --------· -··-· FNMA POOL #0545580 6.000% 104.7094 105,717.200 110,375.36 110,695.81 0.03% 320.45 03/01/2017 DD 03/0l/02SEC ID: 31385JCR7 FNMA POOL #0545998 6.000% 102.6911 205,6.31.110 213,856.35 211,164.79 0.05% -2,691.56 11/01 /2032 DD 10/01 /02SEC ID: 31385JRT7 FNMA POOL #0555101 6.000% 104.8469 185,719.050 193,902.28 194,720.61 0.04% 818.33 10/01/2017 DD 11/01/02SEC ID: 31385WU23 FNMA POOL #0555285 6.000% 102.8867 830,446.270 863,664.13 854,418.93 0.20% -9,245.20 03/01/2033 DD 02/01/03SEC ID: 31385W2S7 FNMA POOL #0555363 5.000% 101.4453 391,033.620 402,764.63 396,685.27 0.09% -6,079.36 04/01/2018 DD 03/0l/03SEC ID: 31385W5Yl FNMA POOL #0555453 5.000% 101.4453 40,046.530 40,559.63 40,625.33 0.01% 65.70 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03SEC ID: 31385XBW6 FNMA POOL #0555528 6.000% 102.8867 802,440.910 834,538.55 825,605.13 0.19% -8,933.42 04/01/2033 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31385XD95 FNMA POOL #0555545 5.000% 101.4453 325,9·49.320 335,727.80 330,660.30 0.08% -5,067.50 06/01/2018 DD 05/0l/03SEC ID: 31385XES2 FNMA POOL #0555621 5.000% 101.3701 l , 127 ,6 11. 960 1,140,297.59 1,143,061.45 0.26% 2,763.86 07 /01/2018 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 31385XG68 FNMA POOL #0555640 6.000% 102.8867 0.010 0.01 0.01 0.00% 0.00 07 /01/2033 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31385XHR1 FNMA POOL #0576386 6.000% 104.3007 65,488.230 68,373.80 68,304.66 0.02% -69.14 05/01/2016 DD 05/01/0lSEC ID: 31386XJ72 FNMA POOL #0576739 6.000% 104.7094 180,265.760 188,208.72 188,755.14 0.04% 546.42 04/01/2016 DD 04/01/0lSEC ID: 31386XV86 FNMA POOL #0580888 6.000% 104.7344 237,644.000 248,115.18 248,894.97 0.06% 779.79 05/01/2016 DD 05/01/0lSEC ID: 31387DJ91 6 Workbench " ------·-··---· ---···----------·---··---·---- Asset Detail by Currency OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30 / 2003 -------·· ---------·····---·----·· -----··-----·-··--·-· ------·------ Price Cost Description Base Shares Par ·-·--·---·---··----·--- FNMA POOL #0594002 6.000% 104.5469 192,904.930 07 /01/2016 DD 07 /01/0lSEC ID: 31387T3K8 FNMA POOL #0597376 6.000% 104.7094 256,057.200 09/01/2016 DD 08/01/0lSEC ID: 31387XT96 FNMA POOL #0605259 6.000% 104.7094 182,017.850 09/01/2016 DD 09/01/0lSEC ID: 31388HMG1 FNMA POOL #0608366 6.000% 104.7094 108,368.850 10/01/2016 DD 09/01/0lSEC ID: 31388LZ78 FNMA POOL #0616734 6.000% 104.8594 171,282.810 12/01/2016 DD 12/01/0lSEC ID: 31388WEF9 FNMA POOL #0630812 6.000% 104.3411 209,265.230 02/01/2017 DD 02/0l/02SEC ID: 31389NYH2 FNMA POOL #0632376 6.000% 104.8469 868,7 44. 720 07/01/2017 DD 07/01/02SEC ID: 31389QQSO FNMA POOL #0653116 6.000% 104.8469 509,731.170 07 /01/2017 DD 07 /01/02SEC ID: 31390QSD8 FNMA POOL #0673280 6.000% 104.5469 208,854.170 08/01/2017 DD ll/Ol/02SEC ID: 31391P6R2 FNMA POOL #0681309 5.000% 101.4453 584,844.190 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03SEC ID: 31391Y3S4 FNMA POOL #0681334 5.000% 101.4453 73,753.380 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03SEC ID: 31391Y4Tl FNMA POOL #0684908 5.000% 101.5453 355,998.830 06/01/2018 DD 05/0l/03SEC ID: 31400D3Rl FNMA POOL #0685200 5.000% 101.4453 209,789.660 03/01/2018 DD 03/0l/03SEC ID: 31400EGH7 Base 201,404.80 267,339.72 190,038.01 113,143.85 178,829.95 218,485.98 907,023.80 532,191.20 218,056.80 602,389.51 75,965.98 360,560.07 212,477.59 Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL ---- Net Unrealized Market Value % of Gain/Loss Base Total Base 201,676.09 0.05% 271.29 268,115.88 0.06% 776.16 190,589.74 0.04% 551.73 113,472.34 0.03% 328.49 179,606.09 0.04% 776.14 218,349.70 0.05% -136.28 910,851.65 0.21% 3,827.85 534,437.18 0.12% 2,245.98 218,350.52 0.05% 293.72 593,297.00 0.14% -9,092.51 74,819.34 0.02% -1,146.64 361,500.12 0.08% 940.05 212,821.77 0.05% 344.18 -------------------------·-·--------·-----··--·----------·-·-------- 7 Workbench ---------·---·. ------· ----·-.. ---· ----------·----···----------· -------------- I J OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO Description FNMA POOL #0685665 5.000% 02/01/2018 DD 02/0l/03SEC ID: 31400EW22 FNMA POOL #0686318 5.000% 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31400FP87 FNMA POOL #0688739 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 31400JEL9 FNMA POOL #0689859 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31400KMG8 FNMA POOL #0693834 5.000% 03/01/2018 DD 03/0l/03SEC ID: 31400PY74 FNMA POOL #0695852 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31400SBVO FNMA POOL #0695889 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/0l/03SEC ID: 31400SC23 FNMA POOL #0697026 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 04/0l/03SEC ID: 31400TLF2 FNMA POOL #0698939 6.000% 09/01/2017 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31400VPY2 FNMA POOL #0702210 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31401ADP9 FNMA POOL #0702328 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03SEC ID: 31401AHD2 FNMA POOL #0703195 6.000% 01/01/2017 DD 04/0l/03SEC ID: 31401BGC3 FNMA POOL #0709148 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 31401HZM7 Price Base Asset Detail by Currency ----· ____ !~/_~0/2003 Cost Shares Par ----~----___ ,. ·--·- 101.4453 37,366.960 101.4453 322,316.290 101.4453 124,553.200 101.4453 138,272.050 101.5703 762,067.340 101.4453 279,876.090 101.4453 850,345.210 101.4453 27,6.80.190 104.9844 92,437.070 101.3701 284,613.180 101.4453 151,690.630 104.9844 83,209.150 101.4453 305, 196.380 8 Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL ----------------···--·-· ···-······ -----------------------· Base 38,487.97 331,985.78 128,289.79 140,043.66 784,929.36 288,272.37 875,855.56 28,510.61 96,510.08 293,151.58 153,634.17 86,875.56 314,352.27 Market Value Base 37,907.03 326,974.76 126,353.38 140,270.51 774,034.16 283,921.17 862,635.33 28,080.25 97,044.48 288,512.69 153,883.03 87,356.61 309,607.41 % of Total 0.01% 0.08% 0.03% 0.03% 0.18% 0.07% 0.20% 0.01% 0.02% 0.07% 0.04% 0.02% 0.07% Net Unrealized Gain/Loss Base -580.94 -5,011.02 -1,936.41 226.85 -10,895.20 -4,351.20 -13,220.23 -430.36 534.40 -4,638.89 248.86 481.05 -4,744.86 Workbench • fJ ------·· ---~---------· ·---·------·· --·--------··--·., -. --------------., Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: I Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 Status: FINAL . ·-·~-----····--· . -------------· ----· Gescription ·------·--·-···-------~ ---.. ',. ______ ------· -------------·-- Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value %of Gain/Loss Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base ··-· --· ----·-------· -·--· FNMA POOL #0709360 5.000% 101.4453 701,877.240 710,870.04 712,021.54 0.16% 1,151.50 07 /01/2018 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 31401JB56 FNMA POOL #0709826 5.000% 101.4453 146,432.690 148,308.86 148,549.10 0.03% 240.24 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401JSP4 FNMA POOL #0709917 5.000% 101.4453 268,422.860 271,862.03 272,302.40 0.06% 440.37 06/01/2018 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 31401JVJ4 FNMA POOL #0709963 5.000% 101.3701 27,274.000 27,623.45 27,647.68 0.01% 24.23 06/01/2018 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 31401JWYO FNMA POOL #0710235 5.000% 101.4453 818,490.370 843,045.09 830,320.09 0.19% -12,725.00 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401KBC8 FNMA POOL #0713344 5.000% 101.4453 26,493.870 27,288.68 26,876.79 0.01% -411.89 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401NP52 FNMA POOL #0713365 5.000% 101.4453 342,541.640 346,930.45 347,492.43 0.08% 561.98 07 /01/2018 DD 07 /Ol/03SEC ID: 31401NQS1 FNMA POOL #0720319 5.000% 101.4453 '999,9'99.370 1,012,811.86 1,014,452.46 0.23% 1,640.60 07 /01/2018 DD 07 /0l/03SEC ID: 31401WG45 FNMA POOL #0720369 5.000% 101.3701 2,487,120.370 2,561,733.98 2,521,196.58 0.58% -40,537.40 06/01/2018 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 31401WJNO FNMA POOL #0721629 5.000% 101.5703 319,195.880 328,771.77 324,208.24 0.07% -4,563.53 07 /01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401XVW4 FNMA POOL #0723487 5.000% 101.4453 254,163.980 257,023.32 257,837.44 0.06% 814.12 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31402AXQ4 FNMA POOL #0729601 5.000% 101.4453 439,182.560 444,809.59 445,530.11 0.10% 720.52 07 /01/2018 DD 07 /Ol/03SEC ID: 31402HRW3 FNMA POOL #0732873 5.000% 101.6703 36,719.150 37,189.61 37,332.47 0.01% 142.86 11/01/2018 DD 10/0l/03SEC ID: 31402MFN5 -------------------------·-· 9 Workbench OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO ---------··---·-----------· Asset Detail by Currency 11/30/2_0_0_3 _________ _ Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL ~-----------------·-···----------------------- f ~ ~rice Description FNMA POOL #0737130 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402S4P9 FNMA POOL #0738211 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402UDQ2 FNMA POOL #0738487 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402UNC2 FNMA POOL #0740471 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402WT40 FNMA POOL #0740748 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31402W5H7 FNMA POOL #0744008 5.000% 07 /01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31403BR54 FNMA POOL #0744316 5.000% 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31403B3Z4 FNMA POOL #0747914 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403F3XO FNMA POOL #0748400 5.000% 08/01/2018 DD 09/0l/03SEC ID: 31403GNR9 FNMA POOL #0748899 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403G7LO FNMA POOL #0750377 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403JUA2 FNMA POOL #0750380 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403JUD6 FNMA POOL #0750445 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD l 1/01/03SEC ID: 31403JWE2 Base Shares Par ----·-·-----··--·----~- 101.4453 754,718.010 101.3701 :595,259.770 101.4453 228,0-81.280 101.3701 790,309.700 101.4453 .834,454.000 101.4453 1, 189,028.270 101.3701 176,746.710 101.4453 .364,5-80.000 101.3701 245,282.020 101.3705 l,•042,469.000 101.3705 2, 575,784.000 101.3705 2, 146,534.000 101.3705 194,967.000 Cost Market Value Base Base ------ 764,387.83 765,626.02 602,886.54 603,415.47 231,003.57 231,377.76 800,435.54 801,137.79 845,145.44 846,514.45 1,204,262.69 1,206,213.41 179,011.28 179,168.33 369,251.18 369,849.31 248,424.70 248,642.65 1,055,825.63 1,056,756.03 2,608,786.23 2,611,085.09 2, 174,036.48 2, 175,952.23 197,465.01 197,639.02 ·--------------------··-·-----·-·--· ·--· ~----·-·----·-------·---------------- Net Unrealized o/o of Gain/Loss Total Base 0.18% 1,238.19 0.14% 528.93 0.05% 374.19 0.18% 702.25 0.19% 1,369.01 0.28% 1,950.72 0.04% 157.05 0.09% 598.13 0.06% 217.95 0.24% 930.40 0.60% 2,298.86 0.50% 1,915.75 0.05% 174.01 10 Workbench .. ·-------------. ----------------· ---------·-~--. -----------GL8013-] Asset Detail Report ID: Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 Status: FINAL ----~-------------·------- I Description ----· -----------------------.. ··-· ------- Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base ----- FNMA POOL #0751960 5.000% 101.3701 917,S.85.000 929,341.56 930,156.90 0.21% 815.34 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403LMH1 FNMA POOL #0753425 5.0000/o 101.4453 999,9'00.000 1,011,461.34 1,014,351.65 0.23% 2,890.31 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403NA23 FNMA POOL #0755165 5.000% 101.4453 663,384.000 671,883.60 672,971.96 0.15% 1,088.36 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403Q6A3 FNMA POOL #0756372 5.000% 101.4453 999,9'00.000 1,011,461.34 1,014,351.65 0.23% 2,890.31 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403SJR8 FNMA POOL #0765165 5.000% 101.2813 45,596.000 46,180.20 46,180.20 0.01% 0.00 11/01/2018 DD ll/Ol/03SEC ID: 31404DCA4 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT6. 750% 104.5930 1, 000,0·00.000 965,170.00 1,045,930.00 0.24% 80,760.00 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93SEC ID: 345397GV9 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL 102.7340 2, 500,0·00.000 2,495,900.00 2,568,350.00 o.5go/o 72,450.00 LANDMARK6.700% 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99SECID:345397SJ3 GNMA POOL #0596612 6.500% 105.3164 384,843.740 403,905.53 405,303.61 0.09% 1,398.08 09/15/2032 DD 09/01/02SEC ID: 36200BYH4 GNMA POOL #0569358 6.500% 105.0311 1,295,429.220 1,325,790.84 1,360,603.64 0.31% 34,812.80 04/15/2032 DD 04/01/02SEC ID: 36200QQK3 GNMA POOL #0569685 6.500% 105.3477 56,586.260 59,389.04 59,612.30 0.01% 223.26 02/15/2032 DD 02/0l/02SEC ID: 36200Q2S2 GNMA POOL #0570019 6.500% 105.3164 94,336.150 99,008.74 99,351.45 0.02% 342.71 07 /15/2032 DD 07 /0l/02SEC ID: 36200RG48 GNMA POOL #0574323 6.500% 105.3477 601,564 .030 631,360.25 633,733.63 0.15% 2,373.38 12/15/2031DD12/01/0lSEC ID: 36200WAY7 GNMA POOL #0575364 6.500% 105.3477 60,775.180 63,785.45 64,025.23 0.01% 239.78 11/15/2031DD11/01/0lSEC ID: 36200XFD6 -----------·-·--------- 11 Workbench ----~----· ------------------···---------. ------·----------------] Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 Status: FINAL ----··--·------•· --------- I Description ·------... •H•••• -·----------·--------------·----------- Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value %of Gain/Loss Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base -----·· - GNMA POOL #0587117 6.500% 105.3477 23,172.590 24,320.36 24,411.78 0.01% 91.42 06/15/2032 DD 06/01/02SEC ID: 36201MG22 GNMA POOL #0587439 6.500% 105.3164 68,5·61. 410 71,957.34 72,206.42 0.02% 249.08 11/15/2032 DD 12/01/02SEC ID: 36201MS45 GNMA POOL #0421389 6.500% 105.6914 15,463.380 16,229.31 16,343.46 0.00% 114.15 04/ 15/2026 DD 04/0l/96SEC ID: 36206UC23 GNMA POOL #0438057 6.000% 103.8398 29,424.360 27,930.17 30,554.21 0.01% 2,624.04 05/15/2028 DD 05/0l/98SEC ID: 36207PTN9 GNMA POOL #0449851 6.500% 105.1050 25,013.020 26,251.95 26,289.94 0.01% 37.99 01/ 15/2028 DD 01/01/98SEC ID: 36208FWLO GNMA POOL #0457814 6.000% 103.8398 39,609.540 37,598.11 41,130.48 0.01% 3,532.37 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 36208QSB3 GNMA POOL #0465546 6.000% 103.8398 480,176.930 455,792.95 498,614.96 0.11% 42,822.01 08/15/2028 DD 08/0l/98SEC ID: 36209AET3 GNMA POOL #0465555 6.000% 103.8398 518,6·09.330 492,273.71 538,523.10 0.12% 46,249.39 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98SEC ID: 36209AE48 GNMA POOL #0466845 6.500% 105.5664 74,805.810 78,511.03 78,969.81 0.02% 458.78 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98SEC ID: 362098TA6 GNMA POOL #0467279 6.000% 103.8398 22,880.140 21,718.26 23,758.70 0.01% 2,040.44 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 36209CCQ7 GNMA POOL #0467286 6.000% 103.8398 398,623.070 378,380.49 413,929.56 0.10% 35,549.07 10/ 15/2028 DD 10/0l/98SEC ID: 36209CCX2 GNMA POOL #0468052 6.500% 105.5664 261,418.890 274,367.29 275,970.54 0.06% 1,603.25 07 /15/2028 DD 07 /01/98SEC ID: 36209CSM4 GNMA POOL #0468330 6.000% 103.8398 18,9·08.130 17,947.94 19,634.17 0.00% 1,686.23 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98SEC ID: 36209DHF4 -··-------·-----·-----·----------··---·--·----------- 12 Workbench ., ---------~· ---------·---··------·--· ---·····-----·- Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base --------·---··· GNMA POOL #0468339 6.000% 103.8398 403,800.000 383,294.55 419,305.27 0.10% 36,010.72 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98SEC ID: 36209DHQO GNMA POOL #0469688 6.000% 103.8398 16,463.830 15,627.77 17,096.01 0.00% 1,468.24 1l/15/2028 DD 11/0l/98SEC ID: 36209EXR8 GNMA POOL #0476041 6.500% 105.5664 224,632.540 235,407.88 237,136.51 0.05% 1,728.63 06/15/2028 DD 06/0l/98SEC ID: 36209MZE7 GNMA POOL #0478626 6.500% 105.4727 179,185.860 187,781.18 188,992.09 0.04% 1,210.91 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99SEC ID: 36209QVT9 GNMA POOL #0480598 6.500% 105.4727 214,424.530 224,710.22 226,159.26 0.05% 1,449.04 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 36209S3F6 GNMA POOL #0483452 6.000% 103.8398 13,209.990 12,539.18 13,717.23 0.000/o 1,178.05 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98SEC ID: 36209WBV3 GNMA POOL #0485527 6.500% 105.3477 488,829.750 513,042.10 514,970.70 0.12% 1,928.60 06/15/2031DD06/01/0lSEC ID: 36209YLG1 GNMA POOL #0485610 6.500% 105.3477 539,528.920 566,252.46 568,381.09 0.13% 2,128.63 07 /15/2031DD07 /01/0lSEC ID: 36209YN38 GNMA POOL #0485682 6.500% 105.3477 111,928.030 117,471.97 117,913.56 0.03% 441.59 08/15/2031DD08/01/0lSEC ID: 36209YRB6 GNMA POOL #0485703 6.500% 105.3477 113,450.460 119,069.81 119,517.40 0.03% 447.59 08/15/2031DD08/01/0lSEC ID: 36209YRY6 GNMA POOL #0486720 6.000% 103.8398 12,311.130 11,685.96 12,783.86 0.00% 1,097.90 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98SEC ID: 36210AVM6 GNMA POOL #0491103 6.000% 103.8398 112,382.860 106,675.93 116,698.18 0.03% 10,022.25 01/15/2029 DD Ol/Ol/99SEC ID: 36210FRY4 GNMA POOL #0496461 6.000% 103.8398 452,391.150 429,418.15 469,762.25 0.11% 40,344.10 01/15/2029 DD Ol/01/99SEC ID: 36210MQN4 ---------------· ------------.... --· -------------------------------- 13 Workbench -----------------------------------------··· ·-----------·· ···--·----·------· --···--------·-· Asset Detail by Currency OCSD-CONSOUDATED-OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 ---------------------·-.. ---·------- Price Cost Description Base Shares Par -----·-------------··---· --- GNMA POOL #0497343 6.000% 103.8398 25,430.320 12/15/2028 DD 12/0l/98SEC ID: 36210NP45 GNMA POOL #0499153 6.000% 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/99SEC ID: 36210QQE5 GNMA POOL #0500917 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/0l/99SEC ID: 36210SPAO GNMA POOL #0503388 6.000% 03/15/2029 DD 03/0l/99SEC ID: 36210VF55 GNMA POOL #0506636 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/0l/99SEC ID: 36210YY90 GNMA POOL #0512235 6.500% 11/15/2029 DD 11/01/99SEC ID: 36211GBC6 GNMA POOL #0514326 6.500% 07/15/2029 DD 07/01/99SEC ID: 36211JLF2 GNMA POOL #0530053 6.500% 04/15/2031DD04/01/0lSEC ID: 36212CZS3 GNMA POOL #0530290 6.500% 03/15/2031DD04/01/0lSEC ID: 36212DC31 GNMA POOL#0537885 6.500% 02/ 15/2031 DD 02/01/0lSEC ID: 36212MRE1 GNMA POOL #0547512 6.500% 04/15/2031DD04/01/0lSEC ID: 36212YGV9 GNMA POOL #0547715 6.500% 02/15/2031DD02/01/0lSEC ID: 36212YN82 GNMA POOL #0552322 6.500% 01/15/2032 DD 01/01/02SEC ID: 36213ESK3 103.8398 12,687.380 103.8398 8,794.890 103.8398 340,345.550 103.8398 37,519.850 105.4102 10,9·48.760 105.4727 178,9'62.070 105.0043 54,734.820 105.3477 69,041.370 105.3477 119,191.360 105.3477 13,388.280 105.3477 128,502.450 105.3477 82,681.100 14 Base 24,138.94 12,043.10 8,348.27 323,062.38 35,614.54 11,491.06 187,546.65 57,445.91 72,353.20 125,095.05 14,051.42 134,666.55 86,776.40 Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Market Value % of Gain/Loss Base Total Base 26,406.80 0.01% 2,267.86 13,174.56 0.00% 1,131.46 9,132.60 0.00% 784.33 353,414.27 0.08% 30,351.89 38,960.55 0.01% 3,346.01 11,541.11 0.00% 50.05 188,756.06 0.04% 1,209.41 57,473.94 0.01% 28.03 72,733.47 0.02% 380.27 125,565.31 0.03% 470.26 14,104.24 0.00% 52.82 135,374.32 0.03% 707.77 87,102.60 0.02% 326.20 Workbench • •l I OCSD-CONSOUD4TED -OCSGOOOlOOOO I Price IJ>ei~_D_e_s_c_ri_p_t_io_n ___ ~~~-~~~~~Base GNMA POOL #0552466 6.500% 105.0311 03/15/2032 DD 03/01/02SEC ID: 36213EW36 GNMA POOL #0552659 6.500% 07I15/2032 DD 07/01 /02SEC ID: 36213E5U6 GNMA POOL #0561017 6.500% 07 /15/2031DD07 /01/0lSEC ID: 36213QG29 GNMA II POOL #0080023VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96SEC ID: 36225CAZ9 GNMA II POOL #080088M 7 .375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/0l/97SEC ID: 36225CC20 GNMA II POOL #0080395VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00SEC ID: 36225CNM4 GNMA II POOL #080408X 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00SEC ID: 36225CN28 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN #TR 00545VAR RT 05/20/2004 DD 05/20/02SECID:36962GYS7 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN #TR 00575 5.450% 01/15/2013 DD 12/06/02SECID:36962GZY3 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR NT 6.125% 08/28/2007 DD 08/29/02SECID:370425SD3 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC SR NT 4.125% 01/15/2008 DD 01/13/03SECID:38141GCS1 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FHVAR RT 02/16/2030SEC ID: 3837H4NX9 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 6.375% 10/15/2011DD10/23/0lSEC ID: 441812JW5 105.3164 105.3477 102.5829 101.5251 100.8708 100.8182 100.0780 103.3590 105.7500 101.8750 100.5910 109.5460 Asset Detail by Currency 11/30/2003 ·-----· -------ReportID: GL80:J3 Base Currency: USD Alternate Base Currency: _ ---·-----··------··-----~chan~~ Rate: Status: FINAL -----·· -· ·---·-----··--,--. Shares Par 628,016.990 476,472.180 464, 148.580 237,974.440 344 ,0 21. 950 284,976.240 2, 565,793.890 1, 000,0·00.000 5, 000,000.000 3, 000,000.000 3, 000,000.000 752,686. 770 l, 635,000.000 --------·---·· -··----- 15 Cost Base 659,123.46 500,072.43 487,138.44 241,915.89 351,547.43 282,393.64 2 ,539. 735.04 1,001,089.00 5,203,500.00 3,064,350.00 3,030,030.00 752,686.77 1,772,820.00 Market Value Base 659,613.19 501,803.39 488,969.67 244,121.03 349,268.63 287,457.67 2,586,785.93 1,000,780.00 5,167,950.00 3,172,500.00 3,056,250.00 757,135.15 1,791,077.10 % of Total 0.15% 0.12% 0.11% 0.06% 0.08% 0.07% 0.60% 0.23% 1.1go1o 0.73% 0.70% 0.17% 0.41% Net Unrealized Gain/Loss Base 489.73 1,730.96 1,831.23 2,205.14 -2,278.80 5,064.03 47,050.89 -309.00 -35,550.00 108,150.00 26,220.00 4,448.38 18,257.10 Workbench . ··--· ------~--------· ---·--·-~--------- Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/30/2003 Status: FINAL ----------Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value %of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base ------ JP MORGAN CHASE & CO SUB NT5. 104.6560 3, 000,0·00.000 3,127,260.00 3, 139,680.00 0.72% 12,420.00 750% 01/02/2013 DD 11/25/02SECID:46625HAT7 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS INC6.625% 101.7810 1, 000,0·00.000 1,045,590.00 1,017,810.00 0.23% -27,780.00 04/01/2004 DD 03/26/99SEC ID: 524908BZ2 MARSH & MCLENNAN COS INC SR 102.7180 2, 000,C>OO.OOO 1,992,280.00 2,054,360.00 0.47% 62,080.00 NT6.625% 06/ 15/2004 DD 06/14/99SECID:571748AB8 MORGAN STANLEY NT 3.625% 99.2340 3, 200,000.000 3,195,648.00 3,175,488.00 0.73% -20,160.00 04/01/2008 DD 03/06/03SEC ID: 617446HW2 NCNB TEX NATL BK DALIAS TEX 103.9060 250,000.000 260,870.00 259,765.00 0.06% -1,105.00 NT 9.500% 06/01/2004 DD 06/0l/89SECID:628857DJO NATIONAL RURAL UTILS COOP FIN 115.7650 3, 000,000.000 3,465,480.00 3,472,950.00 0.80% 7,470.00 7.250% 03/01/2012 DD 03/07/02SECID:637432CU7 NATIONSBANK CORP SR NTS6.125% 102.8750 627 ,000.000 646,650.18 645,026.25 0.15% -1,623.93 07 /15/2004 DD 07 /23/98SEC ID: 638585BJ7 NORWEST FINL INC NTS7.200% 101.9060 520,000.000 531,538.80 529,911.20 0.12% -1,627.60 04/01/2004 DD 04/07 /97SEC ID: 669383DG3 PACIFICORP SECD MTN #TR 00115 104.7340 3,000,000.000 2,950,530.00 3,142,020.00 0.72% 191,490.00 7.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92SECID:69512EEU5 PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC NTS6. 100.0000 500,()00.000 519,405.00 500,000.00 0.12% -19,405.00 450% 12/01/2003 DD 12/01/98SECID:695629CE3 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS 7. 101.5930 1, 000,000.000 1,052,600.00 1,015,930.00 0.23% -36,670.00 500% 04/01/2004 DD 04/01/97SECID:718154CH8 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 16. 107.8000 3,497,276.280 3,497,276.28 3,770,063.83 0.87% 272,787.55 340% 03/0l/2021SEC ID: 83162CWO SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 01 106.9050 2,425,788.580 2,425,788.58 2,593,289.28 0.60% 167,500.70 6.640% 02/10/2011 DD 02/21/01SECID:831641DD4 16 Workbench . ., .---------·--------.. I I OCSD-CONSOLlDATBD. OCSGOOOlOOOO Asset Detail by Currency 11/30/2003 .-----------------------------·-·· ----------·--------- Price Cost Shares Par Base ·-~ -·---··---·--------------------Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL ---·----·-· -----· Net Unrealized Market Value % of Gain/Loss Base Total Base Description _ ------~_a_se __ _ --------------------~-------·-------··----- UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1C6. 15.0730 831% 03/01/2010 DD 08/22/01SECID:909317BC2 US BANCORP MTN #TR 001196. 000% 05/ 15/2004 DD 05/10/99SECID:91159HEY2 U S TREASURY NOTES06.250% 02/ 15/2007 DD 02/ 15/97SEC ID: 9128272JO US TREASURY INFlATION INDEX NT 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97SECID:9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.625% 01/15/2008 DD 01/15/98SECID:9128273T7 US TREASURY INFlATION INDEX NT 3.875% 01/15/2009 DD 01/15/99SECID:9128274Y5 U S TREASURY NOTES05.875% 11/15/2004 DD ll/15/99SEC ID: 9128275S7 U S TREASURY NOTESOS. 750% 11/15/2005 DD 11/15/00SEC ID: 9128276N7 U S TREASURY NT 3.250% 08/15/2008 DD 08/15/03SEC ID: 912828BG4 VERIZON GLOBAL FDG CORP GLOBAL 7.375% 09/01/2012 DD 08/26/02SECID:92344GAT3 VIRGINIA ELEC & PWR 01 SER AS. 750% 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01SECID:927804ENO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES TOTAL ASSETS U.S. DOLLAR 102.0620 111.1250 108.5156 110.7500 112.3125 104.2500 107.2190 99.8700 114.5780 106.6870 TOTAL ASSETS -BASE: l, 600,0-00.000 1, 000,0·00.000 20,000,0-00.000 16,363,200.000 3,438,720.000 14. 678, 9 50.000 5, 000,0·00.000 57, 100,0·00.000 12,000,000.000 3, 000,000.000 1, 750,0·00.000 300,397 ,610.810 418,020,157.960 418,020,157.960 17 1,600,000.00 241,168.00 0.06% -1,358,832.00 1,046,310.00 1,020,620.00 0.23% -25,690.00 22 ,620 ,312 .so 22 ,225 ,000 .00 5.11% -395,312.50 14,436,173.87 17,756,627.93 4.09% 3,320,454.06 3,749,689.05 3 ,808,382 .40 0.88% 58,693.35 16,312,018.79 16,486,295.72 3.79% 174,276.93 5,226,367.19 5,212,500.00 1.20% -13,867.19 62,782,901.47 61,222,049.00 14.09% -1,560,852.47 11,870, 156.25 11,984,400.00 2.76% 114,243.75 3,530,490.00 3,437,340.00 0.79% -93,150.00 1,743,840.00 1,867,022.50 0.43% 123,182.50 313,556,406.40 316,645,393.41 72.87% 3,088,987.01 431,428,613.76 434,517 ,600. 77 100.00% 3,088,987.01 431,428,613.76 434,517 ,600. 77 100.00% 3,088,987.01 Workbench --------------------· ·-·---·-·-----------·----·-------.... -----·---·--------------~---] Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base currency: usn OCSD-CONSOLlDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3 / 2003 -11/28 / 2003 Status: FINAL --------. --------. -·-·-·····-·------~---------------- Tran Type Description ------· --Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR U.S. DOLLAR CD RECD PLAN CONTRIBUTIONSEC ID: 11/26/2003 NA91234590CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO CD RECD PLAN CONTRIBUTIONSEC ID: 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 NA91234590CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO 11/26/2003 TOTAL CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR U.S. DOLLAR: TOTAL CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR BASE: TOTAL RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS BASE: PURCHASES 8 CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 12/ 17 /2003SEC 11/ 12/2003 ID: 26354BZH8BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE 11/ 12/2003 FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: ll/l2 /2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 8 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC MAT 11/26/2003 B B 02/25/2004SEC ID: 313384TN9BROKER: 11/26/2003 UBS SECURITIES LLC, NEW YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ll/26/2003 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC MAT 05I19 /2004SEC ID: 313384XA2BROKER: CITIGROUP GBL MKTS/SALOMON, NEW YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 02/ 12/2004SEC ID: 313396SZ7BROKER: UBS SECURITIES LLC, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 Price Base 99.9008 99.7321 99.4313 99.7240 1 Shares/Par Cost Base ------------------ 0.000 3,000,000.00 0.000 9,000,000.00 0.000 12,000,000.00 0.000 12,000,000.00 0.000 12,000,000.00 1,000,000.000 999,008.33 2,000,000.000 1,994,641.11 2 ,000 ,000. 000 1,988,625.00 2,500,000.000 2,493,100.00 Amount Base 3,000,000.00 9 ,000 ,000.00 12,000,000.00 12,000,000.00 12,000,000.00 -999,008.33 -1,994,641.11 -1, 988,625.00 -2,493, 100.00 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workbench .-------------· -----·------------ 1 ~~~~ TypTra~ Settle Date _ Description Reported Date 8 B B B 8 8 B 8 8 B FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 11/28/2003 02/26/2004SEC ID: 313396TP88ROKER: 11/28/2003 UBS SECURITIES LLC, NEW YORKOCSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO l 1/28/2003 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 11/7 /2003 03/22/2004SEC ID: 313396UQ4BROKER: 11/7 /2003 MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO l 1 /7 /2003 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTSEC ID: 11/19 /2003 313588TF2BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 11/19 /2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07522202: LONG l l / 1912003 TERM OPER-PIMCO FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTSEC ID: 11/26/2003 313588TF2BROKER: UBS SECURITIES LLC, 11/26/2003 NEW YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-l l 12612003 PIM CO FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTSEC ID: 11 /28/2003 313588TF2BROKER: UBS SECURITIES LLC, 11/28/2003 NEW YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-1l 12812003 PIM CO FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 11/19/2003 05/19/2004SECID:313588XA8BROKER: 11/19/2003 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC l l/l 9 /2003 NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11/19 /2003SEC ID: 36959JYK3BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 11/4/2003 11/4/2003 11/4/2003 US TREASURY BILL DUE 05/06/2004 DD 11/3/2003 11/06/2003SEC ID: 912795PX3BROKER: 11/6/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l /J/2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO US TREASURY BILL DUE 05/27 /2004 DD 11/26/2003 1 l/28/2003SEC ID: 912795QA2BROKER: 11/28/2003 MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO l l/2 6/2003 US TREASURY BILL DUE 05/27 /2004 DD 11/28/2003 11/28/2003SEC ID: 912795QA2BROKER: 11/28/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF0751l102: l l/2812003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Price Base Shares/Par -----·~-·-~·-------·---- 99.7313 3,000,000.000 99.5807 2, 100,000.000 99.7295 2,200,000.000 99.7503 1,000,000.000 99.7551 2,000,000.000 99.4262 2,000,000.000 99.9563 500,000.000 99.4820 4,400,000.000 99.4912 2,300,000.000 99.4872 2,000,000.000 Cost Base 2,991,937.50 2,091,194.00 2,194,049.61 997,503.33 1,995,102.78 1,988,523.89 499,781.25 4 ,377 ,207 .88 2,288,297.35 1,989,743.33 ---------·---- 2 Amount Base -2,991,937.50 -2,091,194.00 -2,194,049.61 -997 ,503.33 -1,995,102.78 -1, 988,523.89 -499,781.25 -4 ,377 ,207 .88 -2,288,297 .35 -1,989,743.33 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workbench, OCSD-CONSOLIDATED • OCSGOOOlOOOO Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 B B B 8 8 8 B B B B Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Type Description Reported Date Base -------------- CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.010% 11/3/2003 11/04/2003 DD l l/03/03SEC ID: 11/3/2003 99412E277BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID 11/3/2003 ~~§r"KIMS(T 2 REPO 01.000% 11/14/2003 11/13/2003 DD 11/13/03SEC ID: 99412Q890BROKER: 11/13/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l / 1312003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/17 /2003 11/14/2003 DD 11/14/03SEC ID: 99412S4588ROKER: 11/14/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l / 1412003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.050% 11/18/2003 11/17 /2003 DD ll/17/03SEC ID: 99412T720BROKER: 11/17/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF075 l l l 02: l l / 1712003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980% 11/18/2003 11/19/2003 DD 11/18/03SEC ID: 11/18/2003 99412Ul98BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID ll/18/2003 i?ilf§rKrMSrh REPo oo.980% 1111912003 1111812003 DD 11/18/03SEC ID: 99412V329BROKER: 11/18/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF075 l l l 02: l l / 1812003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00. 980% 11 /20 /2003 11/19 /2003 DD 11I19 /03SEC ID: 99412W7808ROKER: 11I19 /2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF0751l102: l l / 1912003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/21/2003 11/20/2003 DD l l/20/03SEC ID: 99412Y232BROKER: 11/20/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF0751l102: 1112012003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.970% 11/24/2003 11/21/2003 DD 11/21/03SEC ID: 99412Z486BROKER: 11/21/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: l l/2112003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/25/2003 11/24/2003 DD 11/24/03SEC ID: 99413B173BROKER: 11/24/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: 1112412003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 Shares/Par 500,000.000 8,700,000.000 8,700,000.000 5,300,000.000 2,900,000.000 2,900,000.000 1,500,000.000 1,400,000.000 1,300 ,000.000 1,300,000.000 ------·--·----------------··---- 3 Report ID: EWB009 ·1 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL -------·-----------J . Cost Base 500,000.00 8,700,000.00 8,700,000.00 5,300,000.00 2,900,000.00 2,900,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,400,000.00 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 Amount Base Base Net Gain/Loss / --------- -500,000.00 0.00 -8,700,000.00 0.00 -8,700,000.00 0.00 -5,300,000.00 0.00 -2,900,000.00 0.00 -2,900,000.00 0.00 -1,500,000.00 0.00 -1,400,000.00 0.00 -1,300,000.00 0.00 -1,300,000.00 0.00 Workbench -----------------------·----------] Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCS1J.CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL -------------·--··-----.. -·------Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base ----------· B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 11/26/2003 11/25/2003 100.0000 1,300,000.000 1,300,000.00 -1,300 ,000.00 0.00 DD 11/25/03SEC ID: 99413C627BROKER: 11/25/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF0751l102: 1112512003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.020% 11/28/2003 11/26/2003 100.0000 2,300,000.000 2,300,000.00 -2,300,000.00 0.00 DD 11/26/03SEC ID: 99413E052BROKER: 11/26/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: l l/2612003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 11/28/2003 11/26/2003 100.0000 6,700,000.000 6,700,000.00 -6,700,000.00 0.00 DD l l/26/03SEC ID: 99413El28BROKER: 11/26/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l 12612003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 01.020% 11/28/2003 100.0000 5,000,000.000 5,000,000.00 -5,000,000.00 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 11/28/03SEC ID: 11/28/2003 99413F174BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 11/28/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID B ~~N CORP REPO 01.020% 11/28/2003 100.0000 4,800,000.000 4,800,000.00 -4,800,000.00 0.00 12/01/2003 DD 11/28/03SEC ID: 11/28/2003 99413F174BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 11/28/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07522202: LONG B Bf&¥~~y CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/3/2003 1.0000 63,000.100 63,000.10 -63,000.10 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/3/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/3/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/4/2003 1.0000 260.850 260.85 -260.85 0.00 99608524 70CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/4/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/4/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/4/2003 1.0000 354.780 354.78 -354.78 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/4/2003 PIM CO 11/4/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/6/2003 1.0000 8,932.120 8,932.12 -8,932.12 0.00 99608524 70CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/6/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/6/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/10/2003 1.0000 2,006,378.630 2,006,378.63 -2,006,378.63 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/10/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/10/2003 ---------------------· ------------------------------------------- 4 Workbench. r----------------·--------·--· ~---------------···· --· -------------·------------·--·---... ·-· --··------------~-···---- Transaction Detail ReportID: E\VB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCS:O.CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL --·-·--·--------------· ---------·-· -·-------------Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base ---------- B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/12/2003 1.0000 991.670 991.67 -991.67 0.00 9960852470CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-11/12/2003 PIM CO 11/ 12/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/14/2003 1.0000 7.280 7.28 -7.28 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/14/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/14/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/17 /2003 1.0000 338,052.200 338,052.20 -338,052.20 0.00 9960852470CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-11/17 /2003 PIM CO 11/17 /2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/ 17 /2003 1.0000 11,149,413.990 11,149,413.99 -11,149,413.99 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/17 /2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/19/2003 1.0000 993,413.780 993,413.78 -993,413.78 0.00 9960852470CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-11/19/2003 PIM CO 11/19/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/20/2003 1.0000 128,551.260 128,551.26 -128,551.26 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/20/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/20/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/21/2003 1.0000 101,106.670 101,106.67 -10l,106.67 0.00 9960852470CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-11/21/2003 PIM CO 11/21/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/24/2003 1.0000 105.080 105.08 -105.08 0.00 9960852470CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-11/24/2003 PIM CO 11/24/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/25/2003 1.0000 36.110 36.11 -36.11 0.00 9960852470CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-11/25/2003 PIM CO 11/25/2003 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/25/2003 1.0000 2,915,874.030 2,915,874.03 -2,915,874.03 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/25/2003 -·-·--···-----·----------- 5 Workbench OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 ReportlD: E\VB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL '--------------------------·-··----·--------------------------------..------------------------------------··----- 8 8 Tran Type Description Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 99608524 70CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/26/2003 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/26/2003 PIM CO 11/26/2003 TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR: TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR 8 B B B 18 8 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.0000/o 11 /7 /2003 12/01/2033 DD 12/0l/03SEC ID: 12/11/2003 01F0606C48ROKER:CHASE/GREENWICH CAP, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM l l /7 /2 003 e8i&f¥i£A:>uR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 11 /7 /2003 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 12/11/2003 01F0606C48ROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS & l l /7 /2003 CO, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- ~IT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 11/10/2003 12/01/2033 DD 12/01/03SEC ID: 12/11/2003 01F0606C4BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07522202: LONG l l/l0/2003 X§~fisPeMR~NA MTN SR00043 11/17 /2003 7.920% 07 /13/2004 DD 07 /13/94SEC ID: 11/20/2003 045906BU78ROKER: ADVEST CO, HARTFORDOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-l l/ l 7 /2003 K~'O'CIATES CORP NA MTN SR00043 11/l7 /2003 7.920% 07 /13/2004 DD 07 /13/94SEC ID: 11/20/2003 045906BU78ROKER: ADVEST CO, HARTFORDOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-l l / 17 /2003 ~EX NATL BK DALI.AS TEX NT 9.5000/o 11/17 /2003 06/01/2004 DD 06/01/89SEC ID: 11/20/2003 628857DJOBROKER: ADVEST CO, HARTFORDOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-ll / 17 /2003 PIM CO Price Base 1.0000 Shares/Par 6,600,000.000 1.0000 16,302,532.060 124,209,010.610 124,209,010.610 102.0000 500,000.000 102.0625 1,000,000.000 102.2188 1,000,000.000 104.1990 100,000.000 104.1990 0.000 104.3480 250,000.000 6 Cost Base 6,600,000.00 16,302,532.06 124,097' 725.97 124,097, 725. 97 510,000.00 1,020,625.00 1,022,187.50 104,199.00 0.00 260,870.00 Amount Base -6,600,000.00 -16,302,532.06 -124,097,725.97 -124,097, 725. 97 -510,000.00 -1,020,625.00 -1,022,187.50 -104,199.00 -418.00 -260,870.00 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workbench. OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSG00010000 --------·------·-------·--·-----·----_ ..... ~·--·-··--- Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL '----------------------------------·-·- Report m: EWB009 • J --------------------·---------.. I Tran Type Description Trade Date Settle Date Price Reported Date Base 18 8 IB 8 I8 8 18 SALES NCNB TEX NATL BK DALI.AS TEX NT 9.500% 11/17 /2003 104.3480 06/01/2004 DD 06/0l/89SEC ID: 11/20/2003 628857DJOBROKER: ADVEST CO, HARTFORDOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11I17 /2003 N'kW&SBANK CORP SR NTS 6.125% 11/17 /2003 103.1340 07 /15/2004 DD 07 /23/98SEC ID: 11/20/2003 6385858J7BROKER: ADVEST CO, HARTFORDOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-l l I l 7 /2003 N'kW&SBANK CORP SR NTS 6.125% 11/17/2003 103.1340 07 /15/2004 DD 07 /23/98SEC ID: 11/20/2003 6385858J78ROKER: ADVEST CO, HARTFORDOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-l l/17 /2003 ~ST FINL INC NTS 7 .200% 04/01 /2004 11/17 /2003 102.2190 DD 04/07 /97SEC ID: 669383DG3BROKER: 11/17 /2003 ADVEST CO, HARTFORDOCSF07511102: l l/ 1712003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO NORWEST FINL INC NTS 7.200% 04/01/2004 11/17 /2003 102.2190 DD 04 /07 /97SEC ID: 669383DG38ROKER: 11/17 /2003 ADVEST CO, HARTFORDOCSF07511102: l l / 1712003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO US TREASURY NOTES 05.875% 11/15/2004 11/19/2003 104.5273 DD 11/15/99SEC ID: 9128275S78ROKER: 11/19/2003 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NYOCSF07511102: l l/lg/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO U STREASURY NOTES 05.875% 11/15/2004 11/19/2003 104.5273 DD 11/15/99SEC ID: 9128275S7BROKER: 11/19/2003 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NYOCSF075ll102: l l / 1912003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR: TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: TOTAL PURCHASES BASE: CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR Shares/Par 0.000 627 ,000.000 0.000 520,000.000 0.000 5,000,000.000 0.000 8,997 ,000.000 8,997 ,000.000 133,206,010.610 Cost Base 0.00 646,650.18 0.00 531,538.80 0.00 5,226,367.19 0.00 9,322,437.67 9,322,437.67 133,420, 163.64 Amount Base -11,149.31 -646,650.18 -13,334.64 -531,538.80 -4,784.00 -5,226,367.19 -3,228.02 -9,355,351.64 -9,355,351.64 -133,453,077.61 -------------------------------·------------·--------------------- 7 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workbench I OCSD-CONSOIJDATED-OCSGOOOlOOOO --·--· ---·---·--~ -----------·----------------·- J Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL -----··-----------------------------·-------·----- [;an Trade Date Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base Type -----------·-- s FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 11/18/2003 99.7214 -3, 100,000.000 -3,091,364.78 3,091,364. 78 0.00 11/26/2003SEC ID: 313396PT4BROKER: 11/18/2003 UBS SECURITIES LLC, NEW 11/18/2003 YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- IS ~L HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 11/18/2003 99.7214 0.000 0.00 7,960.11 0.00 l l/26/2003SEC ID: 313396PT4BROKER: 11/18/2003 UBS SECURITIES LLC, NEW 11/18/2003 YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- s ~L NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 11/18/2003 99.7334 -11,300,000.000 -11,269,873.65 11,269,873.65 0.00 11/19/2003SECID:313588PL3BROKER: 11/18/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l/!8 /2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 11/18/2003 99.7334 0.000 0.00 29,846.99 0.00 11/19/2003SEC ID: 313588PL3BROKER: 11/18/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l / 1812003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO s FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 11/3/2003 99.5530 -4,400,000.000 -4 ,380 ,332.00 4,380,332.00 0.00 02/19/2004SECID:313588TGOBROKER: 11/6/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l/3 /2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 11/3/2003 99.5530 0.000 0.00 5,808.00 0.00 02/19/2004SEC ID: 313588TGOBROKER: 11/6/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l/3 /2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO s CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.0100/o 11/4/2003 100.0000 -500,000.000 -500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 11/04/2003 DD 1 l/03/03SEC ID: 11/4/2003 99412E277BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 11/4/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF0751l102: LIQUID IS eiiB1¥1~sE FB REPO O 1.010% 11/4/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 14.03 0.00 11/04/2003 DD l l/03/03SEC ID: 11/4/2003 99412E277BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 11/4/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF0751l102: LIQUID s BF~ 2 REPO 01.000% 1l/14/2003 11/14/2003 100.0000 -8,700,000.000 -8,700,000.00 8,700,000.00 0.00 DD 11/ 13/03SEC ID: 99412Q890BROKER: 11/ 14/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l / l 412003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 241.67 0.00 DD ll/13/03SEC ID: 99412Q890BROKER: 11/14/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l/l4 /2003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ---------------·-·--------· --------·-·-···-. -·------------ 8 W..orkbench. C ---· -· --------. -------------------Rep~~~:~~Jl;::::.::::~a~e-g_o_ry_._ -------·----------:.e ~:.:::: ::o~---·1 OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3 / 2003 -l 1/28 / 2003 Status: FINAL ---------·-----. ------------------------·----- Tran Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date Type Description s IS s IS s IS s IS s IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 DD ll/14/03SEC ID: 99412S458BROKER: 11/17 /2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l / 1712003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 DD 11/14/03SEC ID: 99412S458BROKER: 11/17 /2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l / 1712003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.050% 11/18/2003 11/18/2003 DD ll/17/03SEC ID: 99412T720BROKER: 11/18/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: l l/lS/2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.050% 11/18/2003 11/18/2003 DD 11/17 /03SEC ID: 99412T720BROKER: 11/18/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: l l / 18 / 2003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980% 11/19 /2003 11/19/2003 DD ll/18/03SEC ID: 11/19/2003 99412U198BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID l l I 19 /2003 8.R~B11i'JM5fSsE FB REPO 00.980% 11/19 /2003 11/19/2003 DD 11/18/03SEC ID: 11/19/2003 99412U198BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID 11/19/2003 tw~~AM'1S(T 2 REPO 00. 980% 11I19 /2003 11I19 I 2003 DD ll/18/03SEC ID: 99412V329BROKER: 11/19/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF075 l l 102: l l / 1912003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 DD 11/18/03SEC ID: 99412V329BROKER: 11/19/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: l l I 1912003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 11/20/2003 11/20/2003 DD 11/19/03SEC ID: 99412W780BROKER: 11/20/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: l l 12012003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 11/20/2003 11/20/2003 DD 11/19/03SEC ID: 99412W780BROKER: 11/20/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: l l/2012003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Price Base 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 Shares/Par -8, 700,000.000 0.000 -5,300,000.000 0.000 -2,900,000.000 0.000 -2,900,000.000 0.000 -1,500,000.000 0.000 9 Cost Base -8, 700 ,000.00 0.00 -5,300,000.00 0.00 -2,900,000.00 0.00 -2,900,000.00 0.00 -1,500,000.00 0.00 Amount Base 8,700,000.00 725.00 5,300,000.00 154.58 2,900,000.00 78.94 2,900,000.00 78.94 1,500,000.00 40.83 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workbench .. _,. ________ --·-·-----~-· Transaction Detail Report m: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL -----~--------·---Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base -·-· -~~--·-·--··· s LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/21/2003 11/21/2003 100.0000 -1,400,000.000 -1,400,000.00 1,400,000.00 0.00 DD 11/20/03SEC ID: 99412Y232BROKER: 11/21/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF075 l l l 02: l l /2112003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/21/2003 11/21/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 38.89 0.00 DD l l/20/03SEC ID: 99412Y232BROKER: 11/21/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF0751 l 102: l l 12112003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO s LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.970% 11/24/2003 11/24/2003 100.0000 -1,300,000.000 -1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 0.00 DD ll/21/03SEC ID: 99412Z486BROKER: 11/24/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF0751l102: l l /2412003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.970% 11/24/2003 11/24/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 105.08 0.00 DD l l/21/03SEC ID: 99412Z486BROKER: 11/24/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: 1112412003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO s LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 100.0000 -1,300,000.000 -1,300 ,000.00 1,300,000.00 0.00 DD 11/24/03SEC ID: 99413B173BROKER: 11/25/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF0751l102: l l/2512003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000% 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 36.11 0.00 DD 11/24/03SEC ID: 994138173BROKER: 11/25/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF0751l102: l l/2512003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO s LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 100.0000 -1,300,000.000 -1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 0.00 DD 11/25/03SEC ID: 99413C627BROKER: 11/26/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF075 l 1102: l l 12612003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 35.39 0.00 DD l l/25/03SEC ID: 99413C627BROKER: 11/26/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF0751l102: l l/2612003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO s LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.020% 11/28/2003 11/28/2003 100.0000 -2,300,000.000 -2,300,000.00 2,300,000.00 0.00 DD 11/26/03SEC ID: 99413E052BROKER: 11/28/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF075 l 1102: l l 12812003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.020% 11/28/2003 11/28/2003 100.0000 0.000 0.00 130.33 0.00 DD ll/26/03SEC ID: 99413E052BROKER: 11/28/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102: l l/2812003 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ---.. ------- 10 W.orkbench. ---· ---------------------------------·---------· . ----------·-·-·--··. OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 L--------·-----·-------------- Tran Type Description Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date Price Base Shares/Par '---------------------------------------- s IS s s s s s s s s LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 11/28/2003 11/28/2003 DD l l/26/03SEC ID: 99413El28BROKER: l 1 /28/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l /2812003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980% 11/28/2003 11/28/2003 DD 11/26/03SEC ID: 99413E128BROKER: 11/28/2003 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: l l /2812003 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 9960852470CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 99608524 70CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 99608524 70CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO 11/3/2003 11/3/2003 11/3/2003 11/7/2003 11/7 /2003 ll/7 /2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 11/13/2003 11/13/2003 11/13/2003 11/18/2003 11/18/2003 11/18/2003 11/18/2003 11/18/2003 11/18/2003 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 11/20/2003 11/20/2003 11/20/2003 100.0000 -6,700,000.000 100.0000 0.000 1.0000 -36,218.750 1.0000 -91, 194.000 1.0000 -1,893,100.000 1.0000 -146,636.340 1.0000 -499,845.420 1.0000 -8,899,754.780 1.0000 -2,233,582.950 1.0000 -936,580.300 -------------------------------· ------------- 11 Cost Base -6,700,000.00 0.00 -36,218.75 -91,194.00 -1,893, 100.00 -146,636.34 -499,845.42 -8,899,754.78 -2,233,582.95 -936,580.30 ReportID: E\VB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL Amount Base 6,700,000.00 364.78 36,218.75 91,194.00 1,893,100.00 146,636.34 499,845.42 8,899,754.78 2,233,582.95 936,580.30 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workbench Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSG00010000 11/3 / 2003 -11/28 / 2003 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL ------------------------·--------- Report ID: EWB009 ~J - [~-p-~-D-e_s_c_r_i_p_ti_o_n _________ R-ep_o_~-~-t;~:~D~~~=~=e~e ~---~~Pr-~;:--~ha-r-es_/_P_a~r~-------·----------------~-a_05_5: ______ A_m_;_:_:_: ___ N_e_t_Ga_i_n_/B_L_:_:e_s__, s s DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO 11/28/2003 11/28/2003 11/28/2003 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/28/2003 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/28/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/28/2003 TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR: TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR s s IS s IS s COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 1 l /7 /2003 11/01/2033 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 11/13/2003 01F0606B6BROKER: CHASE/GREENWICH CAP, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM l l /7 /2003 ~~-PIM)6L#0555640 6.000% 11/10/2003 07 /01/2033 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 11/ 13/2003 31385XHR1BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST l l/l0/2003 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07522202: LONG f~§i}( OfJ8bflMJ5~5640 6.000% 11/10/2003 07 /01/2033 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 11/13/2003 31385XHR18ROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07522202: LONG l l/l0/2003 ~IM>( 0~£116924961 6.000% 11 /7 /2003 07 /01/2033 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 11/13/2003 31402CMJ8BROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-l l /7 /2 003 lmif1P POOL #0724961 6.000% l 1/7 /2003 07 /01/2033 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 11/13/2003 31402CMJ8BROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-l l /7 /2003 lmif1P POOL #0734231 6.000% l 1 /7 /2003 06/01/2033 DD 07/01/03SEC ID: 11/13/2003 31402NVY1BROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-l l/7 /2003 PIM CO 1.0000 -16,259,591.740 1.0000 -6,581,554.030 -101,178,058.310 -101,178,058.310 102.3516 -500,000.000 102.6016 -810,823.260 102.6016 0.000 102.4141 -47,028.730 102.4141 0.000 102.4141 -902,969.330 ------------·-------------------------------- 12 -16,259,591.74 16,259,591.74 0.00 -6,581,554.03 6,581,554.03 0.00 -101,119,628.74 101,165,288.41 0.00 -101,119,628.74 101,165,288.41 0.00 -511,640.63 511,757.81 117.18 -843,256.19 831,917.33 -11,338.86 0.00 1,621.65 0.00 -48,175.06 48,164.03 -11.03 0.00 94.06 0.00 -924,979.21 924,767.57 -211.64 WDrkbench. r--· -----------··-·····--·-······ ········--- I OCSD-CO.NSOLlDATI!:D -OCSGOOOlOOOO Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 ---------. -----·-· .. --------- ReportID: EWB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL -------·-·-·· ------------------------------------------. Tran Type Description Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date Price Base '-----------------------· --·---·· -- IS s IS s IS s IS s IS s FNMA POOL #0734231 6.0000/o 06/01/2033 DD 07 /Ol/03SEC ID: 31402NVY1BROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- ~ POOL #0749530 6.0000/o 06/01/2033 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31403HVX5BROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- 11/7 /2003 11/13/2003 11/7/2003 11/7/2003 11/13/2003 11/7/2003 ~ POOL #0749530 6.0000/o 11 /7 /2003 06/01/2033 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 11/13/2003 31403HVXSBROKER: GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-11 /7 /2003 ~TR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 11 /7 /2003 6.700% 07 /16/2004 DD 07 /16/99SEC ID: 11/13/2003 345397SJ3BROKER: BARCLAYS CAPITAL l l/7 /2003 INC, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM fi>8}IB-~~eR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 11 /7 /2003 6.700% 07 /16/2004 DD 07 /16/99SEC ID: 11/13/2003 345397SJ3BROKER: BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM l l /7 /2003 8¥~%8\M'if>INc DEB SER A 6.000% 11/7 /2003 01/15/2004 DD 01/15/94SEC ID: 11/13/2003 362337 AD9BROKER: CITIGROUP GBL MKTS/SALOMON, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: l l/7 /2003 l+n!~Oi1H4 ~if~ A 6.000% 11 /7 /2003 01/15/2004 DD 01/15/94SEC ID: 11/13/2003 362337 AD9BROKER: CITIGROUP GBL MKTS/SALOMON, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: l l/7 /2003 ~Qfi<ft>Tfi8~~sT/14E9lTs 7 .5000/o 11 /7 /2003 04/01/2004 DD 04/01/97SEC ID: 11/13/2003 718154CH8BROKER: BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM l l /7 /2003 ~Jt'?PP~s COS INC NTS 7 .500% 11 /7 /2003 04/01/2004 DD 04/01/97SEC ID: 11/13/2003 718154CH8BROKER: BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC, NEW YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM l l/7 /2003 9Hf&rfi~c & PWR 01SERA5.750% 11/5/2003 03/31/2006 DD 03/27 /OlSEC ID: 11/10/2003 927804ENOBROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-11/5/2003 PIM CO --------------------------··--- 102.4141 102.4141 102.4141 102.8320 102.8320 100.8220 100.8220 101.9000 101.9000 107.1340 Shares/Par 0.000 -50,001.690 0.000 -500,000.000 0.000 -3 ,000,000.000 0.000 -4,000,000.000 0.000 -1,750,000.000 13 Cost Base 0.00 -51,220.48 0.00 -499,180.00 0.00 -3,063,750.00 0.00 -4,210,400.00 0.00 -1,743,840.00 Amount Base 1,805.94 51,208.76 100.00 514,160.00 10,887.50 3,024,660.00 59,000.00 4,076,000.00 35,000.00 1,874,845.00 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 -11.72 0.00 14,980.00 0.00 -39,090.00 0.00 -134,400.00 0.00 131,005.00 Workbench ,----------------·-··----------------------· OCSD-CONSOLIDATBD -OCSGOOOlOOOO Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 ~--------------------------------------· Tran Type Description Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date ---------· ···-··-··-~---- Price Base Shares/Par ~---------------------------.. ·~-~--------- IS VIRGINIA ELEC & PWR 01SERA5.750% 11/5/2003 107.1340 0.000 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/0lSEC ID: 11/10/2003 927804ENOBROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-11/5/2003 PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR: -ll,S6o,823.0l0 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR PD GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH VAR RT 02/16/2030SEC ID: 3837H4NX90CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO MATURITIES CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR MT MT MT MT FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 11/07 /2003SEC ID: 313384NY10CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS DISC MAT 11/ 19/2003SEC ID: 313384PL70CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 1 l/26/2003SEC ID: 313384PTOOCSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 11/26/2003SEC ID: 313396PT40CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO TOTAL SALES BASE: 11/16/2003 11/16/2003 11/16/2003 11/7/2003 11/7 /2003 11/7/2003 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 -11,560,823.010 -112, 738,881.320 100.0000 -38,667.380 100.0000 -2,000,000.000 100.0000 -3, 100,000.000 100.0000 -1,600,000.000 100.0000 -6,600,000.000 Cost Base 0.00 -11,896,441.57 -11,896,441.57 -113,016,070.31 -38,667.38 -1,988,663.33 -3,093,442.53 -1,598,743.11 -6,581,615.33 Report ID: EWB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL Amount Base 11,180.56 11,977,170.21 11,977,170.21 113, 142,458.62 38,667.38 1,988,663.33 3,093,442.53 1,598,743.11 6,581,615.33 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 -38,961.07 -38,961.07 -38,961.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------·-·-----------·------------------------- 14 Wprkbench. OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Tran Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date Type Description MT MT MT FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 11/26/2003SEC ID: 313396PT40CSF075 l l 102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC MAT 11/12/2003SEC ID: 313588PD10CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 11/19/2003SEC ID: 313588PL30CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 11/26/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 Price Base 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 Shares/Par -2,400,000.000 -1,000,000.000 -2,300,000.000 MT GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11/ 12/2003SEC 11/12/2003 100.0000 -600,000.000 ID: 36959JYC10CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/12/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/12/2003 MT GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC ll/19/2003SEC 11/19/2003 100.0000 -500,000.000 ID: 36959JYK30CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/19/2003 PIM CO 11/19 /2003 TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR: -20,100,000.000 TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR MT US TREASURY BONDS 11.875% 11/ 15/2003 l l/ 15/2003 100.0000 DD 10/05/83SEC ID: 11/15/2003 912810DGOOCSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-l l/ l 5 /2003 PIM CO TOTAL MATURITIES BASE: INTEREST CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR IT FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT l 1 /07 /2003SEC ID: 313384NY10CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/7/2003 11/7/2003 11/7/2003 -20, 100,000.000 -5,800,000.000 -25,900,000.000 2,000,000.000 15 Cost Base -2,393,314.67 -994,677.08 -2,294,216.46 -597 ,974.33 -499,781.25 -20,042,428.09 -20,042,428.09 -6,251,984.38 -26,294,412.47 11,336.67 -·1 . . Report ID: EWB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL . Amount Base 2,393,314.67 994,677.08 2,294,216.46 597,974.33 499,781.25 20,042,428.09 20,042,428 .09 5,800,000.00 25,842,428.09 11,336.67 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -451,984.38 -451,984.38 0.00 Workbench ·-----· --·-·---- Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL --·-------------- ·-·--··--------------··---. Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS DISC MAT 11/19/2003 3,100,000.000 6,557.47 6,557.47 0.00 11/19/2003SEC ID: 11/19/2003 313384PL70CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/19/2003 PIM CO IT FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 11/26/2003 1,600,000.000 1,256.89 1,256.89 0.00 11 /26 /2003SEC ID: 11/26/2003 313384PTOOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/26/2003 PIM CO IT FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 11/26/2003 2,400,000.000 6,685.33 6,685.33 0.00 11 /26 /2003SEC ID: 11/26/2003 313396PT40CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-11/26/2003 PIM CO IT FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 11/26/2003 6,600,000.000 18,384.67 18,384.67 0.00 11/26/2003SEC ID: 11/26/2003 313396PT40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/26/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC MAT 11/12/2003 l ,000,000.000 5,322.92 5,322.92 0.00 11/12/2003SEC ID: 11/12/2003 313588PD10CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/12/2003 PIM CO IT FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 11/19/2003 2,300,000.000 5,783.54 5,783.54 0.00 11I19 /2003SEC ID: 11/19/2003 313588PL30CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/19/2003 PIMCO IT GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 1l/12/2003SEC 11/12/2003 600,000.000 2,025.67 2,025.67 0.00 ID: 36959JYC 1 OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/12/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/12/2003 IT GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11/19 /2003SEC 11/19/2003 500,000.000 218.75 218.75 0.00 ID: 36959JYK30CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/19/2003 PIMCO 11/19/2003 cw SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ NET OF 11/28/2003 0.000 -473.35 -473.35 0.00 OVERNIGHT INTERESTSEC ID: 11/28/2003 990000PJ40CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/28/2003 IT DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 11/4/2003 0.000 260.85 260.85 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/1/2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/4/2003 ----------- 16 Wprkbench. ---~~----------·----~--.... -·-·-···········-· ·---··------~·-·---·--·-··-··---·------·-~-------·--·----- OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO '----------------------------- Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 -·-------·-· -·-------·--- Trade Date Tran Settle Date Reported Date Type Description IT IT DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO 11/4/2003 11/1/2003 11/4/2003 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCTSEC ID: 11/3/2003 9960870940CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/1 /2003 OPER-PIMCO 11/3/2003 TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR: TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR IT IT IT IT IT IT ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 7.875% 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00SEC ID: 020002ALSOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO BEAR STEARNS MTN # TR 00459 VAR RT 12/01/2003 DD 08/17 /OlSEC ID: 073928VC40CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FHLMC GROUP ##G4-0353 7.500% 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99SEC ID: 3128DBMA20CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/3/2003 11/1/2003 11/3/2003 11/18/2003 11/18/2003 11/18/2003 11/17/2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 11/18/2003 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SEC ID: 10/1/2003 3133TCE950CSF07522202: LONG TERM l l/l8 /2003 OPER-PIMCO FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 11/18/2003 08/15/2032 DD 12/0l/97SEC ID: 10/1/2003 3133TCE950CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/18/2003 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 6.000% 11/18/2003 11/15/2023 DD 11/0l/93SEC ID: 11/1/2003 3133T17A40CSF07522202: LONG TERM ll/l8 /2003 OPER-PIMCO Price Base --------------------------·-·-- Shares/Par 0.000 0.000 20, 100,000.000 20, 100,000.000 1,600,000.000 0.000 16,710.360 35,504.400 0.750 14,935.350 17 Cost Base 122.00 0.10 57,481.51 57,481.51 63,000.00 3,230.50 600.08 3,981.69 0.75 14,935.35 Report ID: EWB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL Amount Base 122.00 0.10 57,481.51 57,481.51 63,000.00 3,230.50 600.08 3,981.69 0.75 14,935.35 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workbench ·------··---··--·--~··---·--~---------~-~-----·----·----------·------· --.J Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL .. -·------···------·--------. ------·-Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base -----·~---· IT FHLMC GROUP #78-6064 6.384% 11/17 /2003 3,388.490 277.57 277.57 0.00 01/01/2028 DD 12/0l/97SEC ID: 10/1/2003 31348SWZ30CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0254510 5.000% 11/25/2003 18,237.070 3,655.21 3,655.21 0.00 11/01/2017 DD 10/01/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31371KVB40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0254631 5.000% 11/25/2003 3,035.710 767.41 767.41 0.00 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31371KY470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0254760 5.000% 11/25/2003 2,336.860 689.10 689.10 0.00 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31371K5V90CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0254866 5.000% 11/25/2003 554.250 297.31 297.31 0.00 09/01/2018 DD 08/0l/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31371LCB30CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0323980 6.000% 11/25/2003 11,133.260 1,152.35 1,152.35 0.00 04/01/2014 DD 09/01/99SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31374T2MOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0357328 5.000% 11/25/2003 940.190 142.18 142.18 0.00 01/01/2018 DD 01/0l/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31376J4M80CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0456482 6.000% 11/25/2003 5,912.830 398.43 398.43 0.00 02/01/2014 DD 02/01/99SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31381CCT20CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0509649 6.000% 11/25/2003 62,203.280 1,200.98 1,200.98 0.00 09/01/2014 DD 09/01/99SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31383QEWOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0535451 6.000% 11/25/2003 8,553.420 913.65 913.65 0.00 06/01/2015 DD 07 /01/00SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31384VZQ80CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO 18 Workbench. ~------------ OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 ---------------- ReportID: E\VB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL -------·-... -----------------------' ..--------------------------·----· --·-·-Trade Date Tran Type Description Settle Date Reported Date IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT FNMA POOL #0535672 6.000% 01/01/2016 DD 12/01/00SEC ID: 31384WCH10CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0545296 6.0000/o 11/01/2016 DD 10/01/0lSEC ID: 31385HXZOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0545580 6.000% 03/01/2017 DD 03/01/02SEC ID: 31385JCR70CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0545998 6.000% 11/01/2032 DD 10/0l/02SEC ID: 31385JRT70CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0555101 6.000% 10/01/2017 DD ll/01/02SEC ID: 31385WU230CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0555285 6.000% 03/01/2033 DD 02/0l/03SEC ID: 31385W2S70CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0555363 5.000% 04/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31385W5YlOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0555528 6.000% 04/01/2033 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31385XD950CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0555545 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/0JSEC ID: 31385XES20CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0555640 6.000% 07 /01/2033 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 31385XHR1 OCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11I1 ;2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 Price Base ----------------------. ------·----· -·----·--·-- 19 Shares/Par 219,014.580 80,642.380 4,925.510 10,391.520 7,403.510 35,257.270 5,440.400 41,848.170 5,131.290 39,318.910 Cost Base 19,929.84 6,666.80 553.21 1,080.11 965.61 4,328.52 1,651.98 4,221.45 1,379.50 4,250.71 Amount Base 19,929.84 6,666.80 553.21 1,080.11 965.61 4,328.52 1,651.98 4,221.45 1,379.50 4,250.71 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workbench I --·· ---··-·--------------· -----------···-----·-------------·-- Transaction Detail Report m: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD I OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL ---·-------·--·--·-· . -·---. -· -·-----· ---------------· I Tnn Trade Date Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base _____ , ___ -·-·-··· ---··-- IT FNMA POOL #0576386 6.0000/o 11/25/2003 3,278.020 343.83 343.83 0.00 05/01/2016 DD 05/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 31386XJ720CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0576739 6.000% 11/25/2003 12,238.980 962.52 962.52 0.00 04/01/2016 DD 04/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 31386XV860CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0580888 6.000% 11/25/2003 13,979.730 1,258.12 1,258.12 0.00 05/01/2016 DD 05/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 31387DJ91 OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0594002 6.000% 11/25/2003 1,237.050 970.71 970.71 0.00 07 /01/2016 DD 07 /01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 31387T3K80CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0597376 6.000% 11/25/2003 10,830.270 1,334.44 1,334.44 0.00 09/01/2016 DD 08/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 31387XT960CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0605259 6.000% 11/25/2003 19,261.250 1,006.40 1,006.40 0.00 09/01/2016 DD 09/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 31388HMG10CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0608366 6.000% 11/25/2003 4,662.330 565.16 565.16 0.00 10/01/2016 DD 09/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 31388LZ780CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0616734 6.000% 11/25/2003 702.850 859.93 859.93 0.00 12/01/2016 DD 12/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 31388WEF90CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0630812 6.000% 11/25/2003 5,898.740 1,075.82 1,075.82 0.00 02/01/2017 DD 02/0l/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31389NYH20CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0632376 6.000% 11/25/2003 45,407.090 4,570.76 4,570.76 0.00 07 /01 /2017 DD 07 /Ol/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31389QQSOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO -.. --·-··------ 20 Workbench. ,--· ·-----··----------------·-------------------------------. -·----------------· Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 L ocsD-CONSOUDATED -ocsooo~~~oo Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL ·----·------· ---·-------· -·--·-----------·--- ·----------·----- Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT FNMA POOL #0653116 6.000% 11/25/2003 10,193.160 2,599.62 2,599.62 0.00 07 /01/2017 DD 07 /01/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31390QSD80CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0673280 6.000% 11/25/2003 7,306.950 1,080.81 1,080.81 0.00 08/01/2017 DD 11/0l/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31391P6R20CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0681309 5.000% 11/25/2003 10,382.180 2,480.11 2,480.11 0.00 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31391 Y3S40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0681334 5.000% 11/25/2003 1,345.080 312.91 312.91 0.00 02/01/2018 DD Ol/01/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31391Y4T10CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0685665 5.000% 11/25/2003 553.910 158.00 158.00 0.00 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31400EW220CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0686318 5.000% 11/25/2003 5,564.810 1,366.17 1,366.17 0.00 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/0JSEC ID: 11/ 1/2003 31400FPB70CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0688739 5.000% 11/25/2003 2,060.800 527.56 527.56 0.00 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31400JEL90CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0693834 5.000% 11/25/2003 7,079.160 3,204.78 3,204.78 0.00 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31400PY740CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0695852 5.000% 11/25/2003 5,992.480 1,191.12 1,191.12 0.00 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 11/1/2003 31400SBVOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL #0695889 5.000% 11/25/2003 13,559.980 3,599.60 3,599.60 0.00 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/0JSEC ID: 11/1/2003 31400SC230CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/25/2003 OPER-PIMCO -----------------------·----------------·-------------- 21 Workbench OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO ·----·---·----·--------- Transaction Detail Rep·orted by Transaction Category 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Report ID: EWB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL ------· -----------·-----~~---------------------------------~ Tran Type Description Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date Price Base ------------··- IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT FNMA POOL #0697026 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03SEC ID: 31400TLF20CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0698939 6.000% 09/01/2017 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31400VPY20CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0702210 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31401ADP90CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0703195 6.000% 01/01/2017 DD 04/01/03SEC ID: 31401BGC30CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0709148 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401HZM70CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0710235 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401KBC80CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0713344 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401NP520CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0720369 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401WJNOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0720369 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401WJNOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO FNMA POOL #0720369 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401WJNOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 11/3/2003 9/1/2003 11/3/2003 11/3/2003 10/1/2003 11/3/2003 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 Shares/Par Cost Base ----··---~---------- 584.490 117.77 9,992.840 512.15 3,529.330 1,200.59 841.960 420.26 2,407.680 1,281.68 7,786.010 3,442.82 124.580 110.91 24,563.280 2,863.74 23,645.090 2,761.39 11,684.120 10,411.69 22 Amount Base 117.77 512.15 1,200.59 420.26 1,281.68 3,442.82 110.91 2,863.74 2,761.39 10,411.69 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wprkben~ Tran Type Description Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date -·---·-------------· ·--·------- Price Base Shares/Par Cost Base '-------------------------------··-·-------- IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT FNMA POOL #0721629 5.000% 07 /01/2018 DD 06/0l/03SEC ID: 31401.XVW40CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/25/2003 11/1/2003 11/25/2003 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 6. 750% 05 / 15 /2005 11/17 / 2003 DD 05/24/93SEC ID: 11/15/2003 345397GV90CSF07522202: LONG TERM l l / 1712003 OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0596612 6.500% 11/17/2003 09/15/2032 DD 09/0l/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36200BYH40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0569358 6.500% 11/18/2003 04/15/2032 DD 04/0l/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36200QQK30CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/18/2003 OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0569685 6.500% 11/17 /2003 02/15/2032 DD 02/0l/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36200Q2S20CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0570019 6.500% 11/17 /2003 07 /15/2032 DD 07 /0l/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36200RG480CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0574323 6.500% 11/17 /2003 12/15/2031DD12/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 36200WAY70CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0575364 6.500% 11/17 /2003 11/15/2031DD11/01/0lSEC ID: 11/ 1/2003 36200XFD60CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/ 17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0587117 6.500% 11/17 /2003 06/15/2032 DD 06/0l/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36201MG220CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0587439 6.500% 11/17/2003 11/15/2032 DD 12/0l/02SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36201MS450CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO 2,210.780 1,339.19 1,000,000.000 33,750.00 402.930 2,086.75 76,320.960 7,430.31 3,456.760 325.23 4,987.470 538.00 34,972.160 3,447.90 4,063.360 351.21 1,266.760 132.38 6,963.060 409.09 23 Report ID: EWB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL Amount Base 1,339.19 33,750.00 2,086.75 7,430.31 325.23 538.00 3,447.90 351.21 132.38 409.09 Net Gain/Loss Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workbench ------·~·-----------+ ---'""" ••• ··------·-·-------·---------·· Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL ·--------··~-···----· -·-·-·-·--· --· -··---Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT GNMA POOL #0421389 6.500% 11/17 /2003 1,103.640 89.74 89.74 0.00 04/15/2026 DD 04/01/96SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36206UC230CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0438057 6.000% 11/17 /2003 40.980 147.33 147.33 0.00 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36207PTN90CSF07522202: LONG TERM ll/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0449851 6.500% 11/17 /2003 42.690 135.72 135.72 0.00 01/ 15/2028 DD 01/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36208FWLOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0457814 6.000% 11/17 /2003 1,418.230 205.14 205.14 0.00 10/15/2028 DD 10/0l/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36208QSB30CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0465546 6.0000/o 11/17 /2003 8,056.130 2,441.17 2,441.17 0.00 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209AET30CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0465555 6.000% 11/17 /2003 14,923.690 2,667.67 2,667.67 0.00 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209AE480CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0466845 6.500% 11/17 /2003 100.450 405.75 405.75 0.00 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209BTA60CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0467279 6.000% 11/17 /2003 40.480 114.60 114.60 0.00 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209CCQ70CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0467286 6.0000/o 11/17 /2003 546.640 1,995.85 1,995.85 0.00 10/ 15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209CCX20CSF07522202: LONG TERM ll/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0468052 6.500% 11/17/2003 1,114.220 1,422.05 1,422.05 0.00 07/15/2028 DD 07/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209C5M40CSF07522202: LONG TERM ll/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO ----------------------·---------------·-·--- 24 W.orkbench. ---------------·· -·--·------·-----·. --:J Transaction Detail ReportID: E'WB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL --------~--··-····-· -··--------------·· ·----.. -·-··---------------------·---------·-------.. -------·------------~-Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base --·------- IT GNMA POOL #0468330 6.000% 11/17 /2003 1,264.130 100.86 100.86 0.00 05/15/2028 DD 05/0l/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209DHF40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0468339 6.000% 11/17/2003 38,651.260 2,212.26 2,212.26 0.00 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209DHQOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0469688 6.000% 11/17 /2003 249.560 83.57 83.57 0.00 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209EXR80CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0476041 6.500% 11/17 /2003 26,421.780 1,359.88 1,359.88 0.00 06/15/2028 DD 06/0l/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209MZE70CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0478626 6.500% 11/17 /2003 13,053.880 1,041.30 1,041.30 0.00 01/15/2029 DD Ol/01/99SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209QVT90CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0480598 6.5000/o 11/17/2003 34,807.640 1,350.01 1,350.01 0.00 10/ 15/2028 DD 10/0l/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209S3F60CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0483452 6.0000/o 11/17 /2003 2,175.730 76.93 76.93 0.00 09/15/2028 DD 09/0l/98SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209WBV30CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0485527 6.500% 11/17 /2003 24,796.890 2,782.15 2,782.15 0.00 06/15/2031 DD 06/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209YLG 1 OCSF07522202: LONG TERM l l/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0485610 6.5000/o 11/17 /2003 55,613.380 3,223.69 3,223.69 0.00 07/15/2031 DD 07 /01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209YN380CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL #0485682 6.500% 11/17 /2003 7,374.760 646.22 646.22 0.00 08/15/2031 DD 08/01/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 36209YRB60CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO ----------------·-----------· --------- 25 Workbench ---------------. --------------·-·· --··------·-----·-··--··---~ Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 1 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSGOOOlOOOO Reported by Transaction Category Base currency: us;__j 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL -------------------------------------·-------------------------------- Tran Type Description Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date Price Base Shares/Par Cost Base Amount Base Net Gain/Loss Base IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT GNMA POOL #0485703 6.500% 08/15/2031DD08/01/0lSEC ID: 36209YRY60CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0486720 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/0l/98SEC ID: 36210AVM60CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0491103 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/0l/99SEC ID: 36210FRY40CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0496461 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/0l/99SEC ID: 36210MQN40CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0497343 6.000% 12/ 15/2028 DD 12/01/98SEC ID: 36210NP450CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0499153 6.000% 02/15/2029 DD 02/0l/99SEC ID: 3621 OQQESOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL#0500917 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99SEC ID: 3621 OSPAOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0503388 6.000% 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99SEC ID: 36210VF550CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0506636 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99SEC ID: 36210YY900CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0512235 6.500% 11/ 15/2029 DD ll/01/99SEC ID: 36211 GBC60CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ------------------··-----~--------·----------- 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 ll/17 /2003 ll/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17/2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 ll/17 /2003 11/17/2003 11/1/2003 11/17/2003 11/17/2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17/2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 122.040 548.530 7,457.720 10,819.920 736.530 21.610 465.410 35,690.830 1,172.620 2,181.280 ----__________ .. _________________ _ 26 615.18 615.18 64.30 64.30 599.20 599.20 2,316.06 2,316.06 130.83 130.83 63.54 63.54 46.30 46.30 1,880.18 1,880.18 193.46 193.46 71.12 71.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Workben'* l . ··---------------------------------. ----------------------... ------· -------. -----------------------------------,z::_ Transaction Detail Report m: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base currency: uso OCSD-CONSOUDATED-OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL -------------------------------. ----------·----·---------------------. ------_______ ___, .---------------------------------------- Tran Type Description Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date Price Base Shares/Par Cost Base Amount Base Net Gain/Loss Base '----------------------------------····· ------------------------------------' IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT GNMA POOL #0514326 6.500% 07 /15/2029 DD 07 /01/99SEC ID: 36211JLF20CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0530053 6.5000/o 04/15/2031DD04/01/0lSEC ID: 36212CZS30CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0530290 6.500% 03/ 15/2031 DD 04/01/0lSEC ID: 36212DC31 OCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0537885 6.500% 02/15/2031DD02/01/0lSEC ID: 36212MRE10CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0547512 6.500% 04/15/2031DD04/01/0lSEC ID: 36212YGV90CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL#0547715 6.500% 02/15/2031 DD 02/01/0lSEC ID: 36212YN820CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0552322 6.500% 01/15/2032 DD 01/01/02SEC ID: 36213ESK30CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0552466 6.5000/o 03/15/2032 DD 03/01/02SEC ID: 36213EW360CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0552659 6.500% 07/15/2032 DD 07/0l/02SEC ID: 36213ESU60CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO GNMA POOL #0561017 6.500% 07 /15/2031 DD 07 /01/0lSEC ID: 36213QG290CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 ll/17 /2003 ll/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/18/2003 11/1/2003 11/18/2003 ll/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 ll/17 /2003 11/17 /2003 11/1/2003 11/17 /2003 ---------------------------------------. -·· - 54,175.020 1,262.83 1,262.83 0.00 3,953.540 317.89 317.89 0.00 75.600 374.38 374.38 0.00 160.300 646.49 646.49 0.00 653.810 76.06 76.06 0.00 164.040 696.94 696.94 0.00 2,866.120 463.38 463.38 0.00 40,602.130 3,621.69 3,621.69 0.00 41,259.010 2,804.38 2,804.38 0.00 46,297.620 2,764.92 2,764.92 0.00 -----·--------------------------- 27 Workbench -------- Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSIJ.CONSOLIDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 11/3/2003 -11/28/2003 Status: FINAL I Tmn Trade Date Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base ------ IT GNMA II POOL #0080023 VAR RT 12/20/202611/20/2003 11,612.240 1,169.94 1,169.94 0.00 DD 12/01/96SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36225CAZ90CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/20/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA II POOL #080088M 7.375% 11/20/2003 4,753.180 1,271.58 1,271.58 0.00 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36225CC200CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/20/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA II POOL #0080395 VAR RT 11/20/2003 9,601.220 859.18 859.18 0.00 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36225CNM40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/20/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA II POOL #080408X 6.500% 11/20/2003 93,886.990 7,757.40 7,757.40 0.00 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00SEC ID: 11/1/2003 36225CN280CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/20/2003 IT GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN #TR 00545 VAR RT 11/20/2003 1,000,000.000 1,067.78 1,067.78 0.00 05/20/2004 DD 05/20/02SEC ID: 11/20/2003 36962GYS70CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-11/20/2003 PIM CO IT GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH VAR RT 11/17 /2003 38,667.380 1,068.33 1,068.33 0.00 02/16/2030SECID: 11/16/2003 3837H4NX90CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/17 /2003 OPER-PIMCO IT SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 01 6.640% 11/10/2003 78,441.180 41,911.89 41,911.89 0.00 02/10/2011DD02/21/0lSEC ID: 11/1/2003 831641DD40CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/10/2003 OPER-PIMCO IT US BANCORP MTN #TR 00119 6.000% 11/17 /2003 1,000,000.000 30,000.00 30,000.00 0.00 05/15/2004 DD 05/10/99SEC ID: 11/15/2003 91159HEY20CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/17 /2003 PIM CO IT US TREASURY BONDS 11.875% 11/15/2003 11/17 /2003 5,800,000.000 344,375.00 344,375.00 0.00 DD 10/05/83SEC ID: 11/15/2003 912810DGOOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-11/17 /2003 PIM CO CD US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.375% 11/28/2003 0.000 53,200.00 53,200.00 0.00 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97SEC ID: 9128272M30CSF07522202: LONG TERM 11/28/2003 OPER-PIMCO 28 Werkbenc~ Transaction Detail Reported by Transaction Category C ----~~----·------------ OCSD-CONSOUDATED -OCSGOOOlOOOO 1l/3 / 2003 • l l / 28 / 2003 ·-------------------------------- Tran Trade Date Settle Date Reported Date· Type Description CD CD IT IT US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.625% 11 /28/2003 01/15/2008 DD 01/15/98SEC ID: 9128273T70CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/28/2003 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.875% 11/28/2003 01/15/2009 DD 01/15/99SEC ID: 9128274YSOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11/28/2003 US TREASURY NOTES 05.750% 11/15/2005 l l/17 /2003 DD 11/ 15/00SEC ID: 11/ 15/2003 9128276N70CSF07522202: LONG TERM l l/l7 /200J OPER-PIMCO WELLS FARGO & CO SUBNT 6.125% 11 /3 /2003 11/01 /2003 DD 11/01 /93SEC ID: 11/1 /2003 949740BY90CSF0751l102: LIQUID OPER-l l/3 /2003 PIM CO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR: TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: TOTAL INTEREST BASE: Price Base Shares/Par 0.000 0.000 57,100,000.000 450,000.000 69, 702,340.230 69, 702,340.230 89,802,340.230 Cost Base 11,190.00 47,840.00 1,641,625.00 13,781.25 2,481,300.09 2,481,300.09 2,538,781.60 -------.. -- Report m: EWB009 Base Currency: USD Status: FINAL Amount Base Net Gain/Loss Base 11,190.00 0.00 47,840.00 0.00 1,641,625.00 0.00 13,781.25 0.00 2,481,300.09 0.00 2,481,300.09 0.00 2,538,781.60 0.00 TOTAL TRANSACTIONS: s4,aao,so2.140 ____ 8,_6_o_9_,7_9_s._o_8 ____ 2_0.;_,1_0_9.;_,2_s_s_.o_s ______ -_49_0......;.,_94_5_._45 ·----------------· ---- 29 Workbench FAHR COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation Drstnct FROM: Gary G . Streed , Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller Meeting Date 12/10/03 Item Number FAH R03-106 SUBJECT: SWAP REPORT FOR TH E QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 GENERAL MANAGER 'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and f ile Swap Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. SUMMARY To Bd. of Di r . 12/17/03 Item Number 14(c) In August 2003, the Committee approved an Interest Rate Exch ang e Ag ree ment Policy that provides guidelines for the use of hedging products including swaps , caps , floors, collars, options , and other similar financial instruments (collectively , "hedging products") in connection wi th the financial exposure of the District , including interest rate exposure. As re qui re d by this policy , following are the quarterly monitoring and reporting requirements and status at September 30 , 2003: Requirement Highlight all material changes to hedging product agreements including counterparty downgrades and/or terminations. Results: The District currently uti lizes two hedging product agreements , the AIG Swap agreement and the Soc Gen Swap Agreement. The AIG Swap agreement was originall y entered into in October 1, 1992 in order to convert the Refunding Certificates of Participation , 1992 Series (the "1992 Certificates") to a fixed rate oblig ation . There have been no material changes to the agreement. American International Group, lnc.'s curre nt ratings are AAA and Aaa from Standard and Poo r's and Moody's, respective ly. The Soc Gen Swap Agreement was originally entered into in September 1, 1993 in order to convert the Refunding Certificates of Participation , 1993 Series (the "1993 Certif icates) to a f ixed rate obligation. T here have been no materi a l changes to the agreement. Soc Gen's current ratings are AA-and Aa3 from Standard and Poor's and Moody's , respectively. Requirement Summarize any new hedging produ cts entered into by the District since the last report. Results : This is t he District's first Swap Report. As stated above, the District utilizes only tw o hedging product agreements, the AIG Swap agreement entered into in 1992 , and the Soc Gen Swap Agreement, entered into in 1993. Requirement Summarize any planned hedging product transactions and the impact of such transactions on the District ; a description of each outstanding Hedging Product agreement, including a summary of its terms and conditions , the notional amount, volume , rates , maturity, the estimated market value of each agreement, the method of procurement (competitive or negotiated), and the full name, description and credit ratings of the agreement's counterparty and if necessary, its applicable guarantor. Results : The District currently is not planning any additional hedging product transactions at this time. Requirement List any amounts which were required to be paid and received , and any amounts which actually were paid and received under each outstanding hedging product over the last quarter; Results : Following are the amounts that were actually paid and received under the District's two swap agreements. All amounts required to be paid and received were actually paid and received. July Paid by the District to the Swap Provider Paid by the Swap Provider on behalf of the District August Paid by the District to the Swap Provider Paid by the Swap Provider on behalf of the District September Paid by the District to the Swap Provider Paid by the Swap Provider on behalf of the District Requirement 1992 Certificates AIG Swap $ 3, 140,606.25 $(2 ,568 ,064.84) 1993 Certificates Soc Gen Swap $163,020.00 $ (33,556.05) $163,020.00 $ (24,505 .91) $161,500.00 .$ (28 ,702.05) List any credit enhancement, liquidity facility or reserves associated therewith including an accounting of all costs and expenses incurred , whether or not in conjunction with the procurement of credit enhancement or liquidity facilities under each outstanding Hedging Product. Results: Credit Enhancements, liquidity facility or reserves associated with the 1992 Certificates AIG Swap: C:\Oocuments and Settingslpope\LocaJ Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKBF\llem 14(c).SWAP Rptdoc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 Lloyds Bank Letter of Credit cost for the quarter ended September 30, 2003: $76,708.40 Credit Enhancements, liquidity facility or reserves associated with the 1993 Certificates Soc Gen Swap: Soc Gen Irrevocable Letter of Credit cost for the quarter ended September 30,2003: $54, 157.87 Requirement An assessment of the counterparty risk, termination risk, and other risks associated therewith, which shall include the value of the collateral posted by counterparties and the District, the aggregate marked-to-market value for each counterparty and relative exposure compared to other counterparties, and a calculation of the District's Value at Risk for each counterparty. Results: The counter party risk and termination risk has been calculated by Public Resources Advisory Group (PRAG). PRAG used the value at risk methodology in determining the county party risk at maximum exposure over the term of the Swap Agreements. Counterparty exposure limits are important because they create diversification, so if any one counterparty goes bankrupt, the District's total loss would be limited to only one counterparty. The termination risk is what the District would have to pay the counterparty upon a termination of the Swap Agreement. Counterparty Risk Termination Risk Requirement 1992 Certificates AIG Swap 1993 Certificates Soc Gen Swap $10,554, 116 $7' 771,664 $15,405,232 $3,498,368 The report shall also include a copy of this Policy in the quarter after it is adopted or subsequently modified. Results: The Interest Rate Exchange Agreement Policy is included as an attachment to this agenda report. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A C:\Documents and Settings\pope\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKBF\ltem 14(c).SWAP Apt.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page3 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT D This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) D This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted. ~ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ATTACHMENTS The District's Policy on Interest Rate Exchange Agreements. C:\Documents and Settlngs\pope\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKBF\ltem 14(c).SWAP Apt.doc Revised: 06104/03 J Page4 ~rr==================================================================================;i I I (@) FINANCE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE Subject: Interest Rate Exchange Index: Finance Administration Agreement Policy Number: 201-3-2 Effective Date: August 27, 2003 II Prepared by: Finance Administration Supersedes: N/A II Approved By: FAHR Committee 1.0 PURPOSE: The District's Interest Rate Exchange Agreement Policy provides guidelines for the use of hedging products including swaps, caps, floors, collars, options, and other similar financial instruments (collectively, "Hedging Products") in connection with the financial exposure of the District, including interest rate exposure. While the use of Hedging Products can reduce the District's exposure to certain risks, prudent monitoring of such instruments is necessary to preserve the District's credit standing and to allow for financial flexibility. As part of the ongoing responsibility of managing the District's finances, the Director of Finance will use these guidelines in determining the appropriate uses for financial Hedging Products and establishing goals for their use. In evaluating a particular transaction involving the use of financial Hedging Products, the Director of Finance shall review the short-term and long-term implications associated with entering into such agreements, including costs, risks, historical trends, capacity limitations, future flexibility, and other similar considerations. The purposes for which the District will consider the use of these products are: 1.1 To prudently reduce exposure to changes in financial valuations in the context of a particular financing, or the overall asset/liability management of the District; or 1 .2 To achieve lower net costs to the District. 1.3 Hedging Products shall not be used for speculative purposes. Page 1 of 10 I I 2.0 ORGANIZATIONS AFFECTED: General Manager's Office, Finance Department, General Counsel, bond rating agencies, financial advisors, bond underwriters, bond counsel, and external independent auditors. 3.0 REFERENCES: 3.1 Government Finance Officers Association publication "A Guide for Preparing a Debt Policy''. 3.2 "Moody's on Municipals-An Introduction to Issuing Debf' by Moody's Investor Services. 3.3 Handbook for Muni-Bond Issuers by Joe Mysak, published by Bloomberg Professional Library. 3.4 Finance Department Policy and Procedure #201-3-1 : Debt Policy. 4.0 POLICY: 4.1 Forms and Agreements- 4.1.1 To the extent possible, the Hedging Product agreements entered into by the District shall contain the terms and conditions set forth in the International Swap and Derivatives Association, Inc. ("ISDA") Master Agreement, including any schedules and confirmation. 4.1.1.1 The schedule should be modified to reflect specific legal· requirements and business terms desired by the District. 4.1.1.2 The Director of Finance shall consider whether to include provisions that permit the District or the counterparty to assign its rights and obligations under an agreement and to optionally terminate such agreement at its market value at any time. 4.1 .2 The District will present the form of agreements to the Board of Directors and request authorization to enter into such agreements subject to modifications determined by the Director of Finance to be in the best interests of the District. Page 2 of 10 ~rr=========================================================================~ 4.2 Procurement- 4.2.1 It shall be the policy of the District to solicit and procure Hedging Products by competitive bidding whenever feasible. 4.2.2 The Director of Finance shall determine which parties it will allow to participate in a competitive transaction but such parties must conform to the minimum credit standards outlined in this Policy. 4.2.3 Notwithstanding the above, the Director of Finance may procure Hedging Products by negotiated methods if it is determined that due to the size or complexity of a particular instrument competitive bidding is undesirable, impractical, or impossible and a negotiated transaction would provide the most value to the District. 4.2.3.1 In such a situation, the Director of Finance should attempt to price the hedge based upon an agreed-to methodology relying on available pricing information to obtain inputs to a mathematical model. 4.2.3.2 If appropriate, the Director of Finance should use an independent financial advisory firm to assist in the price negotiations. 4.2.4 Regardless of the method of procurement, the Director of Finance shall obtain an independent finding that the terms and conditions of any Hedging Product reflect a fair market value of such agreement as of the date of its execution. 4.3 Risk Exposure- 4.3.1 Before entering into a Hedging Product, the Director of Finance shall evaluate all the risks inherent in the transaction. 4.3.1.1 Counterparty Risk: The Director of Finance shall endeavor to minimize counterparty risk by establishing strong minimum counterparty credit standards and diversifying the District's exposure to counterparties. To that end, before entering into a transaction, the District should determine its existing exposure to the relevant counterparty or counterparties and determine how the proposed transaction would affect the exposure. The exposure should not be measured solely in terms of amount or duration of the Hedging Product, but rather how changes in market conditions would affect the District's exposure Page 3of10 ("Value at Risk"). The Value at Risk should be based on all outstanding Hedging Product agreements with each counterparty. 4.3.1.2 Termination risk: The District may be required to make a large payment to the counterparty if the Hedging Product is terminated prior to its scheduled maturity pursuant to its terms. The termination risk can be minimized through selection of counterparties with strong creditworthiness, requiring the counterparty to post collateral in excess of the market value of the agreement, limiting the circumstances where a payment may be required, and by permitting the assignment of the agreement to a creditworthy entity in lieu of termination. 4.3.1.3 Rollover risk: The potential need to find a replacement counterparty as part of the overall plan of finance if the duration of the Hedging Product does not match the expected duration of the underlying financing to be hedged. Rollover risk can be minimized during the initial execution of the plan of finance by matching the duration of any hedge to the financing. 4.3.1.4 Basis risk: The potential mis-match between the payments, typically based on an index, the District is receiving as part of a Hedging Product and the actual payments made by the District. The Director of Finance will evaluate different indices as part of its analysis of a Hedging Product and identify the amount of basis risk that may result from various indices. 4.3.1.5 Event risk: Results from the impact that an unexpected event (i.e. -counterparty actions as a result of certain events, changes in Federal and State income tax codes on interest rates, and other possible events that affect a Hedging Product) has on a hedge established by the District. The Director of Finance will evaluate the potential impact of changes in conditions that could affect the economics of a hedge; for example, how changes in marginal tax brackets affect the economics of using a taxable LIBOR-based interest rate to hedge tax-exempt variable rate exposure. 4.3.2 Identification of the risks and discussion of the means, if any, employed to mitigate the risks will be contained in the Director of Page 4 of 10 Finance's report addressed to the Board of Directors recommending approval of the Hedging Product agreements. 4.4 Counterparty Credit Standards- 4.4.1 Certain risk reduction products result in a continuing exposure to the creditworthiness of financial institutions that serve as the District's counterparties on such transactions. To protect the District's interests in the event of a counterparty credit problem, the Director of Finance will recommend entering into a Hedging Product with a counterparty having capitalization of at least $200 million and only if: 4.4.1 .1 At least two of the counterparty's credit ratings are at least "Aa3" or "AA-", or equivalent by any two of the nationally recognized rating agencies (i.e. Moody's, Standard and Poor's, or Fitch); or 4.4.1 .2 The payment obligations of the counterparty shall be unconditionally guaranteed by an entity with such minimum credit ratings. 4.5 Collateralization On Downgrade- 4.5.1 Should the rating (a) of the counterparty, if its payment obligations are not unconditionally guaranteed by another entity, or (b) of the entity unconditionally guaranteeing its payment obligations, if so secured, not satisfy the requirements set forth in "COUNTERPARTY CREDIT STANDARDS" above, then the obligations of such counterparty shall be collateralized with securities acceptable to the Director of Finance at thresholds with minimum transfer amounts as set forth in the Hedging Product agreement. 4.6 Termination- 4.6.1 A termination payment to or from the District may be required in the event of termination of a Hedging Product due to a default of either the District or the counterparty, certain additional termination events or optional termination by the District. 4.6.2 In the event of default by a counterparty whereby the District would be required to make a termination payment due to the current termination value of a Hedging Product, the Director of Finance will proceed as follows: Page 5of10 4.6.2.1 In order to mitigate the financial impact of making such payment at the time such payment is due, the Director of Finance will seek to replace the terms of the terminated transaction with another counterparty. The District will also have the option to have the defaulting counterparty seek to reassign the agreement to a new counterparty that meets all District criteria. As long as the terms of the replacement Hedging Product agreement are substantially the same as the original agreement (i.e., amount/volume, interest rate, maturity date), the Director of Finance is authorized to find a replacement counterparty without the approval of the Board of Di rectors. 4.6.2.2 If a satisfactory agreement with a new or replacement counterparty is reached, the new counterparty will make an upfront payment to the District in an amount that should nearly offset the payment obligation of the District to the original counterparty. 4.6.2.3 If a satisfactory agreement with a replacement counterparty is not reached, the District will be required to make a termination payment to the original defaulting counterparty. 4.6.3 The Director of Finance will promptly report to the Board of Directors upon the occurrence of a termination event and the actions taken in response. 4. 7 Legality- 4. 7 .1 In conjunction with any hedges, the District must obtain an opinion reasonably acceptable to the market from a regionally or nationally recognized law firm that such Hedging Product is a legal, valid, and binding obligation of the District. 4.8 Responsibilities- 4.8.1 The Director of Finance is responsible for determining the appropriate uses for risk reduction products in conjunction with the District's financings and programmatic needs and making recommendations to the Board of Directors. 4.8.2 The Controller is responsible for reflecting the use of Hedging Products and other derivative financing transactions on the District's financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Page 6of10 4.9 Monitoring and Reporting- 4.9.1 The Director of Finance shall issue a report to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee in each quarter which the District enters into or continues to be a party to a Hedging Product, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following information, to the extent applicable: 4.9.1.1 Highlights of all material changes to Hedging Product agreements including counterparty downgrades and/or terminations; 4.9.1.2 A summary of any new Hedging Products entered into by the District since the last report; 4.9.1.3 A summary of any planned Hedging Product transactions and the impact of such transactions on the District; a description of each outstanding Hedging Product agreement, including a summary of its terms and conditions, the notional amount, volume, rates, maturity, the estimated market value of each agreement, the method of procurement (competitive or negotiated), and the full name, description and credit ratings of the agreement's counterparty and if necessary, its applicable guarantor; 4.9.1.4 Any amounts which were required to be paid and received, and any amounts which actually were paid and received under each outstanding Hedging Product; 4.9.1.5 Any credit enhancement, liquidity facility or reserves associated therewith including an accounting of all costs and expenses incurred, whether or not in conjunction with the procurement of credit enhancement or liquidity facilities under each outstanding Hedging Product; and 4.9.1.6 An assessment of the counterparty risk, termination risk, and other risks associated therewith, which shall include the value of the collateral posted by counterparties and the District, the aggregate marked-to-market value for each counterparty and relative exposure compared to other counterparties, and a calculation of the District's Value at Risk for each counterparty. Page 7of10 4.9.2 Such report shall also include a copy of this Policy in the quarter after it is adopted or subsequently modified. 5.0 DEFINITIONS: 5.1 AMORTIZATION RISK -Represents the cost to the issuer of servicing debt or honoring swap payments due to a mismatch between bonds and the notional amount of swap outstanding. Amortization risk is characteristic of swaps used to hedge variable rate bonds issued to finance amortizing assets, such as mortgages. Amortization risk occurs to the extent bonds and swap notional amounts become mismatched over the life of a transaction. 5.2 BASIS RISK -Refers to a mismatch between the interest rate received from the swap contract and the interest actually owed on the issuer's bonds. 5.3 CALL OPTION -A contract through which the owner is given the right but is not obligated to purchase the underlying security or commodity at a fixed price within a limited time frame. 5.4 CAP -A ceiling, or maximum, for the interest rate which would be paid. 5.5 COLLAR -The combination of owning a Cap and selling a Floor. Generally, it is structured so that the net cost of the collar is zero or close to zero. This means that the expense for the long cap premium is offset by the credit received for the floor premium. 5.6 COUNTER PARTY RISK -The risk that the swap counterparty will not fulfill its obligation to honor its obligations as specified under the contract. 5. 7 DERIVATIVE -A financial product which is based upon another product. Generally, derivatives are risk management tools. 5.8 FLOOR -A lower limit on the interest rate which would be paid. 5.9 INTEREST RATE RISK -The risk associated with changes in general interest rate levels or Yield Curves (See Yield Curves). 5.10 INTEREST RATE SWAP -The contract whereby one party typically agrees to exchange a floating rate for a fixed coupon rate. An essential characteristic of swaps is the swapping of cashflows and not principal amounts. 5.11 ISDA-The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, a global trade association representing participants in the derivatives industry. See a blank Page 8of10 \rr===========================================================================i copy of the ISDA Master Agreement used in developing Hedging Product agreements within Appendix A. 5.12 LIBOR -London lnterBank Offered Rate is the average of rate quotes paid on deposits from five major banks; Bank of America, Barclays, Bank of Tokyo, Deutsche Bank, and Swiss Bank. LIBOR is quoted daily in the Wall Street Journal's Money Rates and compares closely to the 1-year Treasury Security index. LIBOR's cost of money is a widely monitored international interest rate indicator. LIBOR is currently being used by both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as an index on the loans they purchase. 5.13 NOTIONAL AMOUNT -The stipulated principal amount for a swap transaction. There is no transfer of ownership in the principal for a swap; but there is an exchange in the cash flows for the designated interest coupons. 5.14 OPTION -A derivative contract. There are two primary types of options. (See Put and Call). An option is considered a wasting asset because it has a stipulated life to expiration and may expire worthless. Hence, the premium could be wasted. 5.15 PUT OPTION -A contract which grants to the purchaser the right but not the obligation to offer or sell an underlying security. 5.16 ROLLOVER RISK -The risk that the swap contract is not coterminous with the related bonds and might be renewed in adverse conditions. 5.17 SWAP -A customized financial transaction between two or more counterparties who agree to make periodic payments to one another. Swaps cover interest rate, equity, commodity and currency products. They can be simple floating for fixed exchanges or complex hybrid products with multiple option features. 5.18 TAX EVENT RISK -Issuers which issue tax-exempt variable rate bonds inherently accept risk stemming from changes in marginal income tax rates. This is due to the tax code's impact on the trading value of tax-exempt bonds. This risk is also a form of basis risk under swap contracts. 5.19 TERMINATION RISK -The risk that the swap could be terminated by the counterparty due to any of several events, which may include issuer or counterparty ratings downgrade, covenant violation by either party, bankruptcy of either party, swap payment default by either party, and default events as defined in the issuer's bond indenture. The events of default and termination, which could lead to involuntary termination of the contract should include failure to pay, bankruptcy, merger without assumption of obligations anq Illegality. Page 9 of 10 5.20 YIELD CURVE -Refers to the graphical or tabular representation of interest rates across different maturities. The presentation often starts with the shortest term rates and extends towards longer maturities. It reflects the market's views about implied inflation/deflation, liquidity, economic and financial activity and other market forces. Page 10 of 10 FAHR COMMITTEE Mee ting Date To Bel. of Dir. 12/10/03 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Ite m Number Item Number FAHR03-107 14(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake Anderson , General Manager Originator: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: Executive Money Purchase Plan (401 (a) Plan) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-31, Approving Second Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust; 2) Adopt Resolution No . OCSD-32, Approving Third Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust; 3) Adopt Reso lution No . OCSD-33 , Approving Fourth Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust; and , · 4) Adopt Resolution No . OCSD-34 , Terminating the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust. SUMMARY Please refer to attached memoranda from General Counsel regarding the amendments and termination to the Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY NIA BUDGET IMPACT D This item has been budgeted . (Line item: Wages and Salary) D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NIA ALTERNATIVES 1. NI A CEQA FINDINGS NIA ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution Nos. OCSD 03-31 , -32 , -33 and -34 2. Memoranda from General Counsel dated 12101 /03 and 12111 /03 C:\Oocume nts and Sett ingslpope\Local Settlngs\Temporary Internet Flles\OLKBF\l tem 14(d).Penslon Plan3.doc Page2 -(/ RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 03-31 AMENDING DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST (SECOND AMENDMENT) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District, on October 28, 1998, approved an Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, as authorized by United States Internal Revenue Code Section 401 (a); and WHEREAS, the approved Plan made no provision for giving benefits and service credits for military service; and WHEREAS, District desires to amend its Plan to provide benefits and service credits for military service by eligible employee participants. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: Section 10.5 of Article 10 of the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust is hereby added to read: "Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, benefits and service credits with respect to qualified military service shall be provided in accordance with Code Section 414(u)." Section 2: Section 2.6 of Article 2 of the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan is hereby added to read: "Notwithstanding the foregoing, for Plan Years beginning after January 1, 2001, Compensation paid or made available during such Plan Years shall include elective amounts that are not includible in the gross income of the Employee by reason of Section 132(f)(4) of the Code." Section 3: Section 5.4 of Article 5 of the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan is hereby amended by deleting the second sentence thereof in its entirety. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held------ Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary WS&S -TLW:pj:12/11 /03:#178037 ' RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 03-32 AMENDING DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST (THIRD AMENDMENT) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District, on October 28, 1998, approved an Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, as authorized by United States Internal Revenue Code Section 401 (a); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.1, the Board of Directors of the Employer (the "Board") has the authority to amend the Plan document; and WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued regulations requiring the amendment of the Plan to reflect the requirements of Section 401 (a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "401 (a)(9) Requirements"). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 : That the Third Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A". PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held _____ _ Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary WS&S-TLW:pj:12111/03:#178548 . . RESOLUTION NO. OCSD-03-33 AMENDING DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST (FOURTH AMENDMENT> A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT APPROVING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST WHEREAS, the United States Congress enacted into law the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 ("EGTRRA"); and WHEREAS, under the provisions of EGTRRA, the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust require an amendment in order to conform to the newly-enacted legal requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: That the Fourth Amendment to the District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A". PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary WSS-TLW:pj:12/11/03:178553 .. RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 03-34 TERMINATING THE DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT TERMINATING THE DISTRICT'S EXECUTIVE MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND TRUST WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District (the "Employer") currently maintains the Orange County Sanitation District Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust (the "Plan"), which is intended to be qualified under Section 401 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the "Code") and a related trust which is tax exempt under Section 501 (a) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Employer has determined that it is in the best interest of the Employer to terminate the Plan and related Trust, and distribute all the assets in the Plan; and WHEREAS, under Section 9.2 of the Plan, the Employer has reserved the right to terminate the Plan at any time; and WHEREAS, prior to its termination, the Plan must be amended to bring its provisions into compliance with current law; and WHEREAS, under Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Employer has reserved the right to make amendments to the Plan at any time; and WHEREAS, there has been presented to the Board an amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Third Amendment"), designed to bring the Plan into compliance with current law. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 : That the Plan shall be terminated effective as of December 31, 2003 (the ''Termination Date"). Section 2: That the accounts of each participant in the Plan shall fully vest as of the Termination Date. WS&S-TLW:pj:12/11/03:178562 1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TO: Chair and MEMORANDUM Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: December 1, 2003 RE: Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan During the tenure of former General Manager, Don Mcintyre, the District adopted a Supplemental Money Purchase Pension Plan, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 401 (a), at Mr. Mcintyre's request. Other than the cost for tax counsel to prepare and provide the necessary documentation, the Plan was essentially at little or no cost to the District. Mr. Mcintyre had agreed that the District would reduce his approved salary by an amount equal to the contribution into the Plan. The Plan was designed solely for his use and benefit, principally due to the very unique circumstances of his employment, namely his age, his limited expected tenure with the District, and a certain degree of financial independence on his part. Counsel has now prepared a brief "housekeeping" amendment to the Plan, which is required by Internal Revenue Code Regulations. It will have no financial bearing or impact on the District, and is required simply to comply with the Federal Law that all plans contain certain specified provisions. It is a recommendation of special tax counsel, and myself, that this amendment be adopted. This office is inquiring with Mr. Mcintyre as to the desirability of continuing to maintain the Plan, and will advise the Board if there is any contemplated change. TLW:jlo \177892\1 HOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL " LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: December 11, 2003 RE: District's Executive Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust As a follow-up to my prior Memorandum of December 1 , 2003, we have now confirmed that Mr. Mcintyre has no interest in the District's Plan. As no other employees are eligible to participate, and because continuance of the Plan would cause unnecessary expense to the District, Tax Counsel has recommended that the Plan be terminated, effective December 31, 2003. My original Memorandum referenced only one (1) Resolution, approving the Second Amendment. In light of the desirability of immediately terminating the Plan, the Amendments have been divided into four ( 4) separate Resolutions, including Resolution No. 03-34 re termination. Certain of the Amendments are specifically required to be submitted to the Internal Revenue Service, and it becomes more efficient and less confusing to do separate Resolutions. TLW:pj Js\oooe\Local THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd . of Dir. 12/10/03 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR 03·109 Orange County Sanitation Dis trict FROM : Gary G . Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: FEES FOR PROPERTIES ANNEX ING TO THE DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-21 , adopting fees, procedures and policies concerning annexation of properties to the District and repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-03 . SUMMARY The current Ordinance governing annexations was adopted in 1998 and needs to be updated. It contains different rates for each of the old Revenue Areas and it includes prior adjustments based upon cost of living changes. 15 A new Ordinance has been prepared in accordance with the attached staff report. The proposed annexation fee includes two types of charges, based upon acreage . The first is a $1,235 charge for net current assets in order to place the anne xi ng property on equal h istorical footing with ex isting properties . The second is a $3,000 charge that will generate interest income equivalent to the property tax allocation from existing properties . In addition to this total of $4 ,235 per acre , annexing properties will pay the appropriate capital facilities capacity charge (CFCC). PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The last Board action re lated to annexation fees was during the consolidation in July 1998. The current fees range from $3,908 to $5,830 per acre. PROJECVCONTRACTCOSTSUMMARY Staff estimates that there are appro x imately 8 ,250 acres within Orange County and adjacent to our service area boundaries . If all of these properties were to annex to the District, we wou ld receive approximately $35 m ill ion. When the properties are developed they wil l al so pay appropriate C FCCs , and when they are occupied and connected to the sewer they will pay annual user fees. The amount of CFCCs and use r fees cannot be determined at this t ime as the ultimate use of the property is unknown . BUDGET IMPACT D This item has been budgeted . (Line item: ) D This item has been budgeted , but there are insufficient funds. D This item has not been budgeted . [8] Not applicable (information item) G:lwp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reponsl 1203\ltem 15.0rdlnance 21.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please see attached staff report and draft ordinance ALTERNATIVES Alternatives are discussed in the staff report CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1 . Staff Report 2 . Draft Ordinance G :\wp.dta\ogendn\Boord Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1203~tem 15.0rdlnance 2 1.doc Revlned : 06104103 _, Page2 December 10, 2003 STAFF REPORT Annexation Fees BACKGROUND Annexation fees are the fees paid by the owners of property outside of the District's service area that wish to now be inside the service area. Fees are required for two principal reasons. All properties that have been within the service area have contributed property taxes to the District. Prior to the passage of Proposition 13, the Districts levied separate property taxes for operations, capital improvements and debt service. Subsequently, a portion of the 1% basic levy has been allocated to the District. Properties that have been outside of the District have not paid, or had allocated, any of their property taxes to the District. Thus, these properties have not contributed to any of the facilities or other assets of the District. One of the objectives of an annexation fee is to place the annexing properties as closely as possible to the relative financial position they would have been in had the property always been within the District service area. This could be interpreted to mean that an annexing property should pay an amount equal the present value of the accumulated property taxes that would have been paid since 1954. Future property taxes are also an issue for annexing properties. Current law does not allow the agency that the properties are annexing into to automatically participate in the property tax allocation. A property tax exchange agreement must be negotiated with each of the agencies that had been receiving a share of the taxes. This means that each of them must agree to a lesser share of the taxes in order for the District to receive any. These agreements have proven to be difficult to impossible to negotiate. DISCUSSION There are three basic alternatives for calculating an annexation fee that put an annexing property in approximately the same financial position as other properties, depending on how that is defined. For the sake of simplicity, these alternatives can be called "net equity," "back taxes" and "net current assets." Each of these methods also requires payment of a connection fee or Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) before the property can use the District's sewerage system. The "net equity'' method and variations on it are based upon the theory that the annexation property should buy into the current fiscal position of the District. This buy-in is based upon the most recent financial statements and is easily verified. The financial position can include upon the cost of fixed assets or the cost can be reduced by accumulated depreciation to reflect use of those assets. Whichever valuation of net equity is used, that value is divided by the total OCSD -P.O. Box 8127 -Fountain Valley. CA 92728-8127 -(714) 962-2411 Annexation Fees Page 2 of 3 December 10, 2003 number of acres in the service area to determine an annexation fee per acre. This method could provide the appearance of a double charge since the CFCC paid at the time of connection also includes a component for the value of the sewerage system and equipment. Of course properties that have always been within the service area must also pay the CFCC and those properties have always contributed somewhat to net equity. The "back taxes" method seems on the surface to put properties that annex into the same fiscal position as properties that have always been in the service area, but that have not connected to the system. To use this method the assessed value of the property for each year since 1954, the average property tax rate for each year prior to 1978 and property tax allocation factor for year must be known for each annexation. This information is not available at the District and is not expected to be available from the County Assessor's Office. User fees would be excluded from this calculation as those are fees for service which the annexing properties did not receive and should not have paid. The "net current assets" method omits the value of fixed assets and long-term liabilities from the calculation. The theory behind omitting these costs is that the CFCC that will be paid when the property connects to the system will include the proper charge for fixed assets, or capacity in the system. The remaining "net current assets" would basically be cash and inventories that will reduce future user fees. So far the discussion of the three alternative methods has focused only on the value or worth of past property tax payments or allocations. Future property tax allocations are also an issue. Although property values may rise because sewer service is available and although the property owner will pay the same 1 % basic levy as other properties in the District, the District will not receive any property tax allocation. Property tax exchange agreement negotiations fail routinely because the District has the ability to levy a user fee while other ''tax-supported" agencies do not. In fact, this very issue is at the heart of the formation of District 13 in 1985; the County refused to share any of their historical property tax allocation. The County actually has a policy not to share historical property taxes with new enterprise districts. There are two ways to provide for the future property taxes that will not be shared. One way is to include them in the sewer user fees. Because the average property tax allocation to the District is about 2.8% of the 1 % basic levy, these foregone taxes are relatively minor and the impact on the average user fee may be considered to be relatively insignificant. For example, the District's 2003-04 property tax allocation will be approximately $150 per acre. The user fee impact of this method is quite small for an individual property annexation. There are approximately 8,250 acres within the County and adjacent to our service area that are not currently annexed. The largest of these are the Bolsa Chica, the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station and Orange Park Acres. If we assume the current average property tax of $156 per year per acre for each of these 8,250 acres, then the impact on the user fee would be about $1.40 for a single -family residence in order to generate the equivalent $1,287 ,000. Another solution is to collect from the owner of the annexing property an additional amount that would earn annual interest approximately equal to the property taxes that are lost. For example, the 2003-04 property tax allocation for the District is $44 million and the service area is approximately 282,000 acres. This means that the average property tax per acre is about $150 per year. Assuming an average annual interest rate of 5%, it would take a principal amount of $3,000 to generate $150 per year. This method would allow us to use our standard annexation J ' Annexation Fees Page 3 of 3 December 10, 2003 fee as a basis for determining the in-lieu charges for providing service to areas outside the County that are served by contract. RECOMMENDATION Staff has considered the discussion above, along with the discussion of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge alternatives and Sewer Service User Fees, and the histories of each of these charges. We believe that the calculation of Annexation Fees and CFCCs must be coordinated to ensure that no properties pay twice for the same facilities, that all new properties to the District pay their fair share for the assets provided by older properties, that each new user of the sewer system, no matter when they became members of the District, pays its fair share of the cost of the facilities that they will use, and that all users pay their fair share of ongoing operations and maintenance expenses. Staff recommends that the Annexation Fee be made up of two components; a fee for net current assets and a fee to provide equivalent property tax allocations. The property's share of fixed assets will be paid through the CFCC, which is based upon the type of development and the resultant demands upon the sewerage system. Based upon the financial report for June 30, 2003, and the 2003-04 budget, these two parts would be $1,235 and $3,000 for a total of $4,235 per acre. The fee could be revisited each year and a new Ordinance adopted by the Board, or it could be revisited whenever the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is reconsidered. The current annexation fees range from $3,908 to $5,830 per acre but they are not firmly anchored in the balance sheet, the income statement or the budget. GGS G:\wp.dta\fin\21 O\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Staff Report -annexation fees 121003.doc ' ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING FEES, PROCEDURES, AND POLICIES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-03 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ("District") has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-03, adopting fees, procedures, and policies concerning annexations of territory to the District, which Ordinance is presently in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, for purposes of continued efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations, preservation of the public health and safety, and in order to continue the provision of wastewater collection, treatment and disposal services, it is the intent, by adoption of this Ordinance, to continue said procedures and policies in effect, without interruption; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District has received a management report, including financial needs of the District, and wishes to reaffirm the policy of imposing annexation fees when new territory is annexed to the District, and to adopt findings supporting the amount of the fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby FIND: A. That a comprehensive Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled, "Interim Strategic Plan Update -1999", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, has been prepared, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the District identifying the required future development of District capital facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the District's service areas; and B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Interim Strategic Plan have been made available to the public and have been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of law; and C. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments, or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and D. That the properties upon which the fees established by this Ordinance are levied, will, subsequent to payment of an additional Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities; that the costs of operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and that WS&S -TLW:pj:12/11/03:178572 1 said costs will exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues derived from said property; and E. That the District will not receive any tax exchange from said annexed properties because of an agreement with the County of Orange under which there is no tax exchange for newly-annexed property; and F. That the annexation fees imposed by authority of this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide access to the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in California Constitution Article XlllD; and G. That the fees established by this Ordinance will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The collection of these annexation fees will not result in any specific project, and will not result in a direct physical change in the environment; and H. That the fees adopted by this Ordinance are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each property that is annexing, and the service and facilities provided to each annexed property by the District, a portion of which is necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes to the State General Fund as a result of State legislative action on September 2, 1992, and in subsequent years; and I. That the fees adopted by this Ordinance are not imposed as a condition of approval of a development project, as defined in California Government Code Section 66001, and do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016 and California Constitution Article XlllD; and J. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: That the purpose of this Ordinance is to establish fees required to be paid by property owners for the annexation of property to the District. Said fees are in lieu of property taxes not allocated to the District while the property was outside of the District, and in lieu of future property tax allocations through a Tax Exchange Agreement. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance may be used for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction for said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 2: That the proponents of any application for annexation of any territory to the District are requesting that the annexed property become a part of the District's jurisdiction, and that by doing so, they become entitled to receive the benefits of having access to the use of the extensive capital facilities system and to receive the WS&S-TLW:pj:12/11/03:178572 2 , District's service, and shall, as a condition to securing approval of the Board of Directors of the District to such annexation, agree to and comply with the following requirements: A. Payment of all administrative costs incurred by the District in processing the annexation. B. Payment of annexation acreage fees, as follows: Beginning January 1 , 2004, the sum to be paid for annexation of territory to the District for which no tax exchange is negotiated between all affected agencies is hereby fixed: Consolidated Revenue Area Nos. 1-13 Revenue Area No. 14 $4,235/acre NIA C. The annexed territory shall be subject to the terms and conditions of all Ordinances and Resolutions pertaining to fees for connection to the District's facilities and use of said facilities, including but not limited to, industrial discharge permit fees, capital facilities capacity charges, and sewer service user fees. D. The annexed territory shall be annexed into an appropriate local sewering agency, or obtain the written approval of the designated local sewering agency, such as a city, for the purpose of obtaining access to and use of the local sewer system, including pumping stations and force mains, which connects to the District's facilities and system. E. The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retirement of the existing and future bonds of the District, and all other applicable ad valorem taxes of the District. Section 3: The General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to establish procedures and fees for processing annexation of territory to the District. Said procedures may include provisions for collection by the District of fees charged by other local and state agencies involved in the annexation process for submittal to said agencies by the District on behalf of the annexation proponent. The District's Staff is hereby directed to provide the proponents of any proposed annexation a copy of procedures and fee schedules established pursuant to the authority of this Section. Section 4: That the Staff be directed to transmit to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission a certified copy of this Ordinance. Section 5: If any of the provisions of this Ordinance, or the application to any persons or circumstance are held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of this Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section 6: That the provisions of this Ordinance shall become effective _________ and shall apply to all annexations to the District on or after said date. Section 7: That Ordinance No. OCSD-03 is hereby repealed. WS&S -TLW:pj: 12111103:178572 3 Section 8: That the Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a regular meeting held ATIEST: Secretary, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL WS&S-TLW:pj:12/11/03:178572 Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 4 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bel. of Di r. 12/10/03 12/17/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03 -110 Orange County Sanitation D1stnct FROM: Gary Streed , Director of Finance SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES (CONNECTION FEES) MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES , SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AND PERMIT USER CHARGES FOR 2003-04 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 16 Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-22, reaffirming sanitary sewer service charges; adopting capital facil ities capacity charges ; adopting miscellaneous charges and fees relating to industrial discharger, source control permittees and wastehaulers; and repealing Ordinance No OCSD-20. (Must be approved by a 2/3 vote of the e nt ire Bo a rd of Dire cto rs .) SUMMARY The proposed Ordinance includes changes only to the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges (CFCC) and two additions to the schedule of non-compliance fees for permit users . CFCCs , or connection fees , are one-time fees collected in orde r to co v er th e costs of providing sewerage facilities to serve a property. Today, connection fee s are collected for the District by member cities and sanitary districts when building perm its are issued . As a part of the Sewer User Fee discussion in May, staff proposed increases in the CFCC for 2003-04 . The staff proposal was based upon the methodology adopted subsequent to the Rate Advisory Committee work and reflected the recently completed Validated Capital Improvement Program . The Directors deferred any action on increased rates as they wanted to concentrate their focus on the Sewer User Fees. This report is the final in a series that set the stage for a CFCC rate change . Previous reports provided the background that is required to understand the exi sting CFCC program , addressed the concerns that the Directors raised and discussed the theory of some of the methods for calculating a CFCC and their impacts. The proposed CFCC for th e benchmark 3-bedroom , single-family residence is proposed to increase from $1 ,820 to $2,890 to pay for capaci ty needed for future growth . Other CFCCs and the Supplemental CFCC charged some permit users will also increase . Additionally, the staff is recommending a small change to the fees for signifi cant users with permits from our Source Control Division . A new fee is recommended to be levied against a firm that is considered to be "significantly non-complianf' (SNC) in order to C:\Documents and Settlngs\pope\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKB F\l tem 16.0rdinance 22.doc Revised: 8120/9 8 Page 1 recover District's costs associated with obtaining data and publishing the required notice. These fees are proposed to be $165 and $260. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Capital Facilities Capacity Charges of $10.2 million were collected in 2002-03; approximately 6 % of the District's revenue. Future amounts depend on the rates and the rate of new development. Had the proposed rate schedule been in effect for 2002-03, the total CFCCs would have been approximately $16.2 million. BUDGET IMPACT r8] This item has been budgeted. D This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds . D This item has not been budgeted . D Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1 . Base CFCCs are determined by type of development and are calculated per 1 ,000 square feet of building for non-residential development and per unit for residential development. 2. Three categories of Commercial connection fees have been developed: low demand , average demand and high demand. 3. Significant Industrial Users (Class I Permit Users) are charged demand-based connection fees as a part of their ongoing annual use charges , in addition to the one-time, up-front charge . These fees will include an interest component. 4 . Residential fees are tiered based upon number of bedrooms for single-family residential (SFR) and multi-family residential (MFR) development, as number · of bedrooms is the best available indicator of number of residents. 5 . Connection fees are collected by local sewering agencies at the time the building permit is issued , and they retain 5% of the fee. 6 . Credit for demolished structures is granted as if fees for those structures had been paid under the current Ordinance. 7 . Connection fees are charged for local agency facilities such as schools, city halls and libraries, as well a s for state and federal facilities. ALTERNATIVES See enclosed Staff Report. C:\Oocuments and Se tting s~pe\locaJ Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKBF\Jtem 16.0rd lnance 22.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 2 ~ CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1 . CFCC Staff Report 2. Important Parameters Affecting CFCCs, Revised 3. Current Capital Facilities Capacity Charges 4. Significantly Non-Compliant User Staff report GGS C:\Documents and Settings\pope\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKBF\Jtem 16.0rdinance 22.doc Revised: 8/20198 Page3 December 10, 2003 STAFF REPORT Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) BACKGROUND Capital Facilities Capacity Charges are typically one-time fees paid by developers when building permits are issued. The fees are collected for the District by the member agency responsible for local sewers. For 2002-03, the total CFCC's collected amounted to just over $10 million; approximately 6% of the District's revenues. The current CFCC rates, structure and philosophy were adopted subsequent to the 1999 Strategic Plan and the Rate Advisory Committee process. When the rates were recalculated to incorporate the changes from the Interim Strategic Plan Update and the Validated Capital Improvement Program, the FAHR Committee asked that they be revisited. Among the Committee's concerns were whether new development would be expected to pay for additional capacity and whether the number of bedrooms was the appropriate basis for residential fees. Capital Investment Equalization Method Beginning with the "2020 Master Plan" which was adopted in 1989, the District's connection fee or CFCC has been computed using the Capital Investment Equalization Method. While the method and the theory have not changed, the costs that are included and the rates that result have changed. The basic theory is that all of the users in 2020 will have paid the same dollar amount for the facilities that exist in 2020. In 1999, this base fee was modified to reflect the differing demands from differing sizes of residential uses and differing types of non-residential users. The Capital Investment Equalization Method means that new users are required to pay for a share of existing facilities, existing current assets, future capacity, future improved treatment and future rehabilitation, refurbishment and replacement projects. Existing users will also pay a share though user fees, property taxes or previously paid connection fees. The simplified formula for computing the base rate can be shown as: (Existing Facilities -Depr + Future Facilities+ RRR Projects) CFCC rate= (Existing Users+ Future Users) OCSD -P.O. Box 8127 -Fountain Valley. CA 92728-8127 -(714> 962-241 l Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) Page 2 of 4 December 10, 2003 In order to use this formula, residential and non-residential users must first be converted to "equivalent dwelling units." The flow, BOD and SS discharges from a three-bedroom single family residence are used to establish the number of EDUs. This is the formula that was used to calculate the CFCCs that were presented to the FAHR in May of 2003. After reviewing every project in the Validated CIP for the proper allocation to flow, BOD and SS, to residential and non-residential users and the impacts of wet weather infiltration and inflow, the result of this calculation was an increase in the SFR rate from $1,820 to $3,063; an increase of 68%. If these rates were to be adopted, then the total fees collected from "new growth" would be sufficient to cover the anticipated additional capacity projects. Variations on the Capital Investment Equalization Method Theme There is some latitude within the broad theory of the capital investment equalization method. One variation is that only the existing facilities and future additions should be included. This variation would remove the projected cost of future rehabilitation, refurbishment and replacement facilities from the CFCC and would have the ARR projects paid from annual user fees. Since all users of the system pay user fees on the basis of flow, BOD and SS, all users (existing and future) would then pay their fair share of these projects. Since the CFCC is expected to be revised approximately every five years when the Strategic Plan is updated, any RRR projects during the five years would move into the existing facilities category; increasing future CFCC rates. If this methodology were implemented, then the total fees collected from "new growth" would be approximately 80% of the anticipated additional capacity projects. Another variation could be to exclude the net current assets from the calculation. This exclusion could be in addition to excluding the RRR projects above, or in place of that. The rationale for excluding these costs is that they are not capital facilities; they are cash, investments, inventory, etc. Many of these current assets will be expended on operations and maintenance for the benefit of existing users. Those that are used for capital improvements will be included in existing net capital assets when the CFCCs are reconsidered with the future Strategic Plans. If this methodology were implemented, then the total fees collected from "new growth" would be approximately 60% of the anticipated additional capacity projects. Growth Pays for Growth Growth pays for growth is the shorthand way to express the belief that in order for new users to pay their fair share of capital improvement costs, they should pay for all of the new capacity facilities. The thinking behind this is that we would incur almost all of the other capital improvement costs whether or not there are any new users. This could be called the incremental cost method. Existing current assets were obtained from current users and will be used for capital projects that benefit current users or for operations and maintenance expenses on current capital assets. Current capital assets were constructed with funds from current users and would be sufficient for current users' needs into the future. Future RRR projects will be funded by then current users through the user fee. The simplified formula for computing the growth pays for growth rate can be shown as: ., Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) Page 3 of 4 December 10, 2003 Future Facilities CFCC rate= Future Users In order to use this method, it is necessary to know the projected cost of future facilities to provide both capacity and secondary treatment to future users as well as the number of future users. If this methodology were implemented, then the total fees collected from "new growth" would be exactly equal to the cost of the anticipated additional capacity projects. Bedrooms as Basis for Residential CFCCs One of the recommendations of the Rate Advisory Committee (RAC) was that the residential connection fee should be tiered to reflect actual or potential impact on the District's facilities. Prior to the RAC's work, there was only one rate for all types of residential connections. Consultants and staff analyzed census data and County Assessor's Office data to establish a correlation between some data point and sewer system demand. The data set with the best correlation was the number of bedrooms although other parameters, including number of bathrooms were considered. Sewer system demand is a function of population; the more people there are in a home, the higher the sewer system demand. While there are certainly exceptions, some of them notable, the number of people in a dwelling unit is more closely aligned to the number of bedrooms than to the number of bathrooms. Of course, this is not a perfect match and the closeness to actual varies over time. It would not be uncommon for a family of two to purchase a four-bedroom home, for the family to grow to four or more for several years, and then to become a family of two again after some time. During this period, the household impact on sewer system demand could go from below average to above average and back to below average. The intent of the CFCC basis is to match the fee with the potential average demand. Residential dwelling modifications sometimes lead to issues with this method of determining fees. A CFCC is due only when a building permit is requested for an additional bedroom. An additional bathroom does not require a fee. An additional den or office does not require a fee. There have been instances of plans being resubmitted after the fees are quoted and the revised plans show offices replacing bedrooms in the original plans. One could speculate that the closet might be added later, without a building permit. Staff is recommending that we accept this potential dishonesty as a cost of doing business. Our CFCC structure is based upon the number of bedrooms reflecting the potential sewer use. Changing the basis to bathrooms for building modifications will negate our existing structure. Including dens, offices, family rooms and other additional spaces as a basis is also counter to our original theory. We simply don't have the nexus established to use other than bedrooms. Sources of Future Flows The Interim Strategic Plan Update projects average daily flows of 321 million gallons in 2020. This will be an increase of 80 million gallons per day over the 241 million gallons per day flow at the time the Interim Strategic Plan was completed. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) Page 4 of 4 December 10, 2003 Twenty-four mgd is projected to come from SAWPA. SAWPA pays for capacity when needed based upon the average strength of their discharge for the prior year and the treatment and disposal plant portion of the CFCC; they already own sufficient collection system capacity. (Although SAWPA currently owns 13 million gallons per day of treatment and disposal capacity, and has a right to purchase another 17 million gallons per day, they were only discharging at the rate of 6 million gallons per day when the Strategic Plan was completed.) Essentially SAWPA pays the CFCC like other users. Twenty-six mgd is projected to come from the area served by the IRWD. The IRWD users do not pay OCSD a CFCC directly. Instead, IRWD pays a share of the monthly outlay for capital improvement projects based upon the IRWD share of total flow. Each year the accumulated payments are adjusted to reflect the current shares. Currently, IRWD uses and has paid for about 3% of the total treatment facilities. By 2020, this percentage is expected to increase to about 10%. During this period, IRWD will routinely purchase additional capacity at the actual cost to provide that capacity up to 32 million gallons per day. The remaining 30 mgd will come from new and existing users in the District's service area. This growth has been allocated to match the population, housing and employment projections from the Center for Demographic Research at California State University at Fullerton. These growth projections indicate that only 37% of the funds for capital improvements will come from CFCCs and the majority of funds will come from SAWPA and from IRWD. GGS G:\wp.dta\fin\21 O\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\DEC\Staff Report Conn Fee 12-03.doc Page 1of3 Important Parameters Affecting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Revised November 26, 2003 A Planning Parameters 1989 1999 2003 Master Plan Strat Plan Validated CIP Planning horizon 30yrs 21 yrs 19 yrs 2 CIP budget $1.48 billion $1.51 billion $2.38 billion 3 Projected Flow 399 MGD 352 MGD 321 MGD 4 Flow per household (EDU) 399 gpd 260 gpd 260 gpd 5 Number of flow based EDUs 1,000,000 1,354,000 1,235,000 6 Flow per 1,000 sq ft for average commercial user 80 gpd 150 gpd 150gpd 7 Commercial 1,000 ft : SFR ratio 20% 58% 58% B Growth Projections 2020-2000 2000 2005 2020 % Change Source Population, w/o OCSD 14 2, 191,610 2,283,298 2,466,220 12.5% CDR 2 Housing, w/o OCSD 14 723,299 732,729 768,848 6.3% CDR 3 Employment, w/o OCSD 14 1, 112,369 1,221,786 1,426,757 28.3% CDR 4 Single Family Residences 427,007 454,000 6.3% 2020 quant OC Ass'r 5 Multi Family Residences 239.310 254,000 6.1% OC Ass'r adj to keep 6 Assessor Housing w/o 14 666,317 708,000 6.3% CDR ratio OC Ass'r 7 1,000 sq ft non-residential 446,108 572,000 28.2% constant OC Ass'r 8 Flow from OCSD 14 (IRWD) 6 12 32 433.3% CDMISPU 9 Flow from SAW PA 6 15 30 400.0% CDMISPU 10 Floww/o 14 & SAWPA 229 237 259 15.1% CDMISPU 11 Flow from all sources, MGD 241 264 321 34.9% CDMISPU c Daily Flow Contributions 2000 Actual 2020 Projections OC Assessor Average CDR Adj'd Percent Number of Daily Flow Number of Of Average Units or (Gallons) Average Units or Increased Property Use MGD 1,000 sq ft Per Unit MGD 1,000 sq ft Flow 1 Residential 111 427,000 260 118 454,000 8.8% 2 Multi-Family Residential 43 239,000 182 46 254,000 3.8% 3 Commercial 67 446,000 150 86 572,000 23.8% 4 IRWD (OCSD14) 6 32 32.5% 5 SAW PA 6 30 30.0% 6 Wet Weather, Infiltration, Inflow 8 9 1.3% 7 Average MGD total 241 321 100.0% 12/11/2003 C:\Documents and Settings\pope\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKBF\ltem 16.2 Page 2 of 3 Important Parameters Affecting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Revised November 26, 2003 D Preliminary Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Options J K h .M N Q 1999 2003 ARR Paid Fixed Assets Growth Pays Strat Plan ValCIP By User Fee Only For Growth Existing Net Non-Capital Assets $ 347,000,000 572,000,000 572,000,000 2 Existing Net Capital Assets 416,000,000 502,000,000 502,000,000 502,000,000 3 Additional Capacity 805,000,000 836,000,000 836,000,000 836,000,000 836,000,000 4 Improved Treatment 48,000,000 562,000,000 562,000,000 562,000,000 5 Replacement, Rehab, Refurb 665,000,000 1,053,000,000 6 Support 14,000,000 106,000,000 106,000,000 106,000,000 7 Total $ 2,295,000,000 3,631,000,000 2,578,000,000 2,006,000,000 $ 836,000,000 8 EDUs in 2020 @ 260 gpd 1,354,000 1,235,000 1,235,000 1,235,000 308,000 9 Investment per EDU* $ 1,695 $ 2,940 $ 2,087 $ 1,624 $ 2,714 10 Raised by new EDUs $ 723,630,000 $ 905,540,000 $ 642,930,000 $ 500,280,000 $ 836,000,000 * Differs from CFCC per base 3 bedroom SFR because Infiltration, Inflow and Runoff adjustments have not been included 12111/2003 C:\Documents and Settings\pope\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKBF\ltem 16.2 Page 3 of 3 Important Parameters Affecting Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Revised November 26, 2003 E Recommended "Growth Pays For Growth" Capital Facilities Capacity Charge Commercial I Residential Industrial Total 1 Additional Capacity Projects $ 548,416,000 $ 287 ,584,000 $ 836,000,000 2 Adjust Wet Weather Flow Facilities 3511841000 (351 184,000) 3 Additional Capacity Adjusted for WW $ 583,600,000 $ 252,400,000 $ 836,000,000 4 New EDUs in 2020 202,000 106,000 308,000 5 CFCC per EDU $ 2,890 $ 2,380 $ 2,714 6 New Non-Res 1000 sq ft in OCSD $ 126,000 7 New Non-Res 1000 sq ft o/s OCSD 115,000 8 Total New Non-Res 1000 sq ft $ 241,000 9 CFCC per 1000 sq ft $ 1,050 10 Use Catego~ SFR Factor Res Rates Non Res Rates 11 Commercial/ Industrial 12 Low Demand $ 170 13 Average Demand 1,050 14 High Demand 2,490 15 Single Family Residential 16 5+ Bedrooms 1.39 $ 4,020 17 4 Bedrooms 1.19 3,440 18 3 Bedrooms 1.00 2,890 19 2 Bedrooms 0.81 2,340 20 1 Bedrooms 0.62 1,790 21 Multi-Family Residential 22 4+ Bedrooms 1.08 3,120 23 3 Bedrooms 0.89 2,570 24 2 Bedrooms 0.70 2,020 25 1 Bedrooms 0.50 1,450 26 Studio 0.32 920 27 Supplemental CFCC for Permit Users, includes 5% cost of funds 28 Flow, per million gallons per day $ 0.001001 29 BOD, per 1000 pounds per day 0.289100 30 SS, per 1000 pounds per day 0.187150 12/11/2003 C:\Documents and Settings\pope\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKBF\ltem 16.2 Current Capital Facilities Capacity Charges The current CFCCs were adopted by Ordinance in June of 1999. Pursuant to Board policy, new rates were proposed to the FAHR Committee in May 2003, subsequent to the Interim Strategic Plan Update and the Validated Capital Improvement Program. The proposed CFCC rate changes were deferred by the Committee pending additional information, leaving the 1999 rates in effect as shown below. CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial -Industrial Per 1,000 square feet Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 110.00 Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 675.00 High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,600.00 Single Family Residential Per Unit 5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530.00 4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,475.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1, 130.00 Multi-Family Residential Per Unit 4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,620.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910.00 Studio Per Unit $ 580.00 The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (SCFCC) is applied to Significant Industrial Users on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the User's baseline. The SCFCC charge is based upon each discharge component and includes a nominal interest charge because the facilities must be paid for by the District in advance. Component Measurement Daily Charge Flow BOD SS Gallons Per Day Pounds Per Day Pounds Per Day $0.00057 $0.14461 $0.16025 Self Monitoring Performance, Self Monitoring Reporting and Reporting Non Compliance Fees Source Control September, 2003 The Federal Code of Regulations, 40CFR403 requires that the District implement a pretreatment program (Source Control Program) that includes the implementation of a monitoring program of industrial users. One element of this monitoring program is self monitoring, by which, industrial dischargers to the sewer conduct self monitoring of their discharges and submit the data to the District. The District's Ordinance No. OCSD-01 authorizes the District to obtain from dischargers data and reports for self monitoring of wastewater constituents and characteristics to monitor the discharger's compliance with permit conditions and determination of annual user charges. The requirement to self monitor and provide data that establishes the industrial discharger's compliance status is instituted either through Wastewater Discharge Permit (Permit) conditions or through enforcement instruments such as Probation Orders, Environmental Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) and other administrative actions. District's Source Control division has developed, implemented and is administering as part of its approved Source Control Program self monitoring and reporting program that requires dischargers holding a permit with the District to self sample for constituents prescribed in the discharge permit and at a frequency specified in the permit, and provide reports on the results of the sampling on a schedule also specified as a condition of the permit. In addition, various other reports are required from the discharger to assess user charges and determine compliance either as part of the permit or as a result of enforcement actions. The District incurs costs whenever these requirements are not met, either by failure to perform the self monitoring action or provide data, or by failure to submit report of the required data or information in accordance with schedule. For these cases, the District incurs administrative costs in tracking, evaluation of status and in administering various notifications to the non-compliant discharger in accordance with legal and the EPA approved Enforcement Management Program. In accordance with federal regulations, any discharger who fails to provide a report required by . the District within thirty (30) days from due date, is designated to be significantly non-compliant (SNC) and is subsequently, as a first enforcement step, published in a local newspaper followed by enforcement actions to attain compliance. Because of the administration and programmatic requirements, and because of due process in case of an SNC finding, the District incurs significant costs for each discharger who is delinquent in reporting. The District proposes two levels of cost assessments. 1. SNC Determination. This involves one or two late notifications (depending on the reporting program), delinquency evaluation to determine SNC status and notifications, follow up actions and determination of further enforcement. The cost to the District for each discharger who is designated and notified to be SNC is assessed at $165.00. 2. Annual SNC and Publication. Following a finding of SNC, the District evaluates and takes action to publish SNC permittees in the local paper, as required by federal regulations. This action includes several steps, including notification, meetings, notification of the paper, and final review of findings. The cost to the District for each discharger found annual SNC and considered for publication is assessed at $260.00. Because costs would have been incurred by the District whether the discharger is 1 published or not, this fee is not waived or returned if, based on subsequent findings, the discharger is not published, or other enforcement actions are suspended. This fee will be assessed at the time the District sends and the discharger receives the notification that it has been found SNC for the fiscal year and publication, or other enforcement action, is pending. The total fee assessed a discharger who has failed to submit data, or is late in submitting data and designated SNC, and is then found to be an annual SNC, with potential publication, is $425.00 Staff proposes the following wording and changes to Ordinance No. OCSD-20: 1. Section 4.03, pg. 23 Section 4.03 Source Control Non-Compliance Fees. Source control non-compliance fees are hereby established for dischargers' non-compliance sampling and for self monitoring and data reporting non-compliance, in the sum or sums as set forth in Table F, below. 2. Table F, pg. 25 2 TABLE F DISCHARGER SOURCE CONTROL NON-COMPLIANCE FEES Discharger Non-Compliance Sampling Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Minor Violation Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Major Violation Cost of Analysis Heavy Metals • Aluminum • Antimony • Arsenic • Cadmium • Copper • Gold • Lead • Molybdenum • Nickel • Palladium • Platinum • Selenium • Silver • Thallium • Zinc Mercury 601/602 604 606 608 610 612 624 625 3 Charge $225.00 per event $500.00 per event Charge $ 35.00 each $ 78.00 $152.00 $223.00 $254.00 $523.00 $ 73.00 $200.00 $355.00 $661.00 Discharger Non-Compliance Sampling Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) BOD and Suspended Solids (SS) Analysis Chemical Oxygen Demand Conductivity Cyanide (Amenable) Dissolved Mineral Solids Gamma Radiation Determination Gross Alpha and Beta Determination Tritium Determination Oil & Grease (Hexane Soluble Matter) Oil & Grease (Mineral Partition) Total Organic Nitrogen pH Fluoride Suspended Solids (Total) Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) Total Dissolved Solids Total Sulfides Self-Monitoring and Data Reporting Non-Compliance Cost of Processing and Issuing Significant Non-Compliance Notification Cost of Processing Annual SNC and Publication 4 Charge Charge $ 21.00 $ 44.00 $ 67.00 $ 44.00 $ 15.00 $ 70.00 $ 15.00 $115.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 74.00 $ 74.00 $ 48.00 $ 8.00 $ 51.00 $ 23.00 $ 44.00 $ 14.00 $ 29.00 $165.00 $260.00 ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR INCREASED CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES AND CERTAIN SELF-MONITORING AND NON-COMPLIANCE CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-20 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ("Districf') has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-18, establishing annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for all uses, establishing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges to be imposed when properties either newly-connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District; establishing miscellaneous industrial discharger fees, source control/non-compliance sampling fees, and wastehauler charges, which Ordinance is presently in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, for purposes of improved efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations, it is the intent, by the adoption of this Ordinance, to re-enact the existing Ordinances that establish capital facilities fees and miscellaneous charges, and to provide for certain increases in certain sewer service charges. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: Section I. Fees and Charges Ordinance -Adopted TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I: RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01, Findings-Declaration of Intent ARTICLE II: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01, Purpose and Scope Section 2.02, Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge #178580:12/11/03 1 ARTICLE Ill: #178580: 12111 /03 Section 2.03 A. Exemptions B. Application for Rebate C. Application for Refund D. Limitation Period E. Determination F. Administrative Fee Section 2.04, Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year Section 2.05, Method of Collection Section 2.06, Credit for Industrial Permittees Table A Annual Sewer Service Charges for Residential Users Table B Annual Sewer Service Charges Property Use Classifications for Commercial or Industrial Users CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Section 3.01, Purpose and Scope Section 3.02, Definitions Section 3.03, Connection Permits: Required Section 3.04, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Section 3.05, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment Section 3.06, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts Section 3.07, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial -Industrial Users -Special Purpose Dischargers - Definitions Section 3.08, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial - Industrial Users Section 3.09, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Purpose Dischargers Section 3.10, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial - Industrial Users -Special Purpose Dischargers Table C Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Section 3.11, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Section 3.12, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Section 3.13, Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements 2 ARTICLE IV: ARTICLE V: Section 3.14, No Refund or Transfer Section 3.15, Baseline Transferability Table D Capital Facilities Capacity Charges MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS. SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01, Purpose and Scope Section 4.02, Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees Section 4.03, Industrial Discharger, Source Control, and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Section 4.04, Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use Section 4.05, Class I and Class 11 Permittees -Charges for Use Section 4.06, Wastehauler Charges for Use Section 4.07, Administrative Appeals Table E Administrative Fees and Charges Relating To Permittees Table F Industrial Discharger, Source Control and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Table G Class I and Class II Permittees and Special Purpose Discharge Permittees Charges For Use Table H Wastehauler Charges for Use MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01, Application of Ordinance Section 5.02, Exceptions Section 5.03, Severability Section 5.04, Effective Date Section 5.05, Repeal Section 5.06, Certification and Publication ARTICLE I RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01. Findings -Declaration of Intent. The Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Master Plans, as more particularly described in Findings B, C, D, and E below, setting forth the financial and engineering needs of the District, and hereby adopts the following Findings supporting the amounts of charges and fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. #178580:12111/03 3 A. That the former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California (the "Predecessor Districts"), were nine individual County Sanitation Districts, organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). By action of the Board of Directors of the Predecessor Districts, pursuant to specific legislation enacted by the California State Legislature in 1996, an application was submitted to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission to legally consolidate the nine Predecessor Districts into one single Sanitation District for all purposes. The application was approved, with an effective date of July 1, 1998. As of July 1, 1998, the Predecessor Districts ceased to exist, and one single consolidated County Sanitation District, known as the Orange County Sanitation District, came into existence in place of the Predecessor Districts. The District was formed to carry on the functions of the Predecessor Districts. B. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities, entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989", hereinafter referred to as the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, was prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, setting forth and identifying the required future development of District Facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the individual service areas of each of the nine Predecessor Districts. C. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan were made available to the public, both prior to and subsequent to the adoption of the Master Plan, and were subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 66016, and other provisions of law. D. That the Predecessor Districts, during the years 1997 and 1998, commenced comprehensive planning, engineering, and financial studies to develop an updated Comprehensive Master Plan of Capital Facilities, which studies are referred to as the District's "Strategic Plan", which was approved and adopted by the Resolution No. 99-21 of Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. E. That the District, in 1997, as part of its Strategic Plan studies, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain access to the system. #178580: 12/11 /03 4 F. That in support of this Ordinance and the revised charges for sewer service and/or Capital Facilities Capacity Charges as provided for on Tables A, C, D and G herein, the Board of Directors finds that the Capital Improvement Program ("CIP") Validation Study for Fiscal year 2003-04 and the Secondary Treatment Peer Review, as approved by the Board of Directors, has resulted in the development of a Capital Improvement Program that provides for the implementation of secondary treatment standards, thereby improving effluent quality in a reasonably short period of time, consistent with the goals and policies of the Board of Directors, the member agencies, and the public, while also providing for the construction of necessary improvements to accommodate projected increased flows and the rehabilitation and refurbishment of existing facilities. The Board further finds that programming annual adjustments in sewer service charges over a period of years is appropriate and ensures adequate revenues to finance the improvements and programs necessary to implement secondary treatment standards, accommodate increased flows, rehabilitate and refurbish existing facilities, and retire any necessary or prudent debt incurred to finance such improvements in a reasonable manner and over a reasonable period of time. The Board of Directors also finds that such Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Capital Facilities Capacity Charges are reasonably related to, and do not exceed the cost of providing sewer services. G. That the financial requirements of the District, as shown in reports prepared by Staff and Consultants relating to the Strategic Plan and the CIP validation studies, are based on current, reliable information and data relating to population projections, wastewater flow, and capital facilities' needs, and are expected to be realized in each year as described in the reports. H. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the sewage collection, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and to assist in the payment of costs to the District to provide all regulatory administration and laboratory services related to the industrial dischargers, source control permittees, and wastehauler users of the District's systems. I. That the owners or occupants of properties upon which all fees and charges established by this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process. #178580:12/11/03 5 J. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public health and safety, and to preserve the environment without damage. K. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established and levied by this Ordinance are to allow the District to recover the reasonable costs to provide a service to individual properties which have been improved for any of numerous types of uses. The basis for the respective charge is the request of the owner of property or a structure thereon, for the benefit of him/her/itself, or the occupants of the property, to receive a service based upon actual use, consumption, and disposal of water to the District's system in lieu of disposal by other means. L. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance are not imposed as a condition of approval of a development project, as defined in California Government Code Section 66001 , and do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016 and California Constitution Article XlllD. M. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these Sanitary Sewer Service Charges will not result in any specific project, nor result in a direct physical change in the environment. N. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities provided to each customer of the District, a portion of which are necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes to the State General Fund as a result of state legislative action on September 2, 1992, and in subsequent years. 0. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinances, commencing in 1969, and most recently by Ordinance No. OCSD- 18, established Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges" or ''tees", to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system. Said Charges are required as a financial payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the system, and for future facilities to be constructed. P. That the District's previous and present Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Ordinances, include[ d] authority for the District to levy an excess or supplemental capacity charge upon commercial and industrial users #178580:12/11/03 6 who discharge quantities or high strength wastewater greater than the established base line of authorized discharge. Q. That the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges re-enacted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property or structure, by the District, within a given category. R. That the miscellaneous charges and fees re-enacted by this Ordinance without change are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged to each industrial discharger, source control permittee, or wastehauler and the service and facilities provided to each. S. That the District is required by federal and state law, including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq.), the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 C.F.R. 403), and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code Sections 13000 et seq.) to implement and enforce a program for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the District's sewers. T. That the District is required by federal, state and local law, to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality. U. That pursuant to these requirements, the Board of Directors has adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations. V. That the District incurs additional costs in conducting non- compliance sampling of those industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations and in administering the industrial, wastehauler, and special discharge permit programs. W. That Ordinance No OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, provides that the Board of Directors is to establish various fees and charges to recover those costs to the District which are made necessary by industrial dischargers and wastehaulers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. X. That the industrial discharger, source control, and wastehauler fees and charges hereby established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to the District of industrial discharger, source control, or wastehauler use of the District's facilities and for the administration and implementation of permit and fee processing, non-compliance sampling, and related services associated with the District's Source Control Program. #178580: 12/11 /03 7 Y. That all fees and charges established herein have been approved by the District's Board of Directors at a noticed public meeting, all in accordance with applicable provisions of law. Z. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b )(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). AA. That each of the Findings set forth in previous Ordinances Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSD-11, OCSD-13, OCSD-15, OCSD-18, and OCSD-19 are reaffirmed and readopted hereat, except to the extent that they have been specifically superseded or otherwise amended by specific Findings herein. ARTICLE II SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish Sanitary Sewer Service Charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 2.02. Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance, the owner of each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial, or industrial use and which, at the request of the owner or the owner's predecessor-in-interest, is connected to the District's system, shall pay an annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge based on the respective class of users, in the sum or sums, as set forth in Tables A and B of this Ordinance, below. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for residential users are set forth in Table A. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for commercial or industrial users are dependent upon the respective classifications of property use, determined by reference to Table B; the applicable percentage figure shown on Table B with respect to the particular use classification is multiplied by the applicable single family residential rate shown in Table A, to arrive at the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. #178580:12111 /03 8 Section 2.03. A. Exemptions. It is the intent of the District that the legal owner(s) of parcels of real property, otherwise subject to the levy and payment of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, as prescribed herein, be relieved, in whole or in part, from the payment of said charges, in certain circumstances and under conditions prescribed herein, and be entitled to either a rebate or a refund with respect to charges paid, as more specifically set forth in Subparagraphs 2.038 and 2.03C below, provided an inequity is established or a billing error is proven, as specified in Subparagraphs B or C. B. Application for Rebate. Any property owner may apply to the District for a rebate of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that an unfair valuation of the property has been made by the District. An applicant for a rebate must establish, by proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that an inequity exists between the amount of the charge paid and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system, resulting in an unfair valuation. Satisfactory proof shall establish that either: (1) The principal water use is agricultural or horticultural; or (2) The property is devoted to any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. Satisfactory proof shall include, but not be limited to, documentation showing actual water usage for each billing cycle during the entire period for which the rebate is sought. The amount of any rebate shall not reduce the charge payable by any property owner, whose property is connected to the District's system, to less than the single family residential charge shown on the applicable Table attached hereto. C. Application for Refund. Any property owner may apply to the District for a refund of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that the amount paid was pursuant to an error in the amount billed or the amount paid. The applicant for a refund must submit proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that a billing error has been made by the District, or the County Tax Collector. Such proof shall include, but not be limited to, proof that: (1) The owner's parcel of property is not connected to the District's system; or #178580:12111/03 9 (2) The property has not been classified in the proper land use category; or (3) A clerical error has been made. D. Limitations Period. Applications for rebates and refunds shall be deemed to be governed by the provisions of California Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 5096 and 5097, allowing for refunds for a period of four (4) years from the date of payment of the second installment of the bill claimed to be either inequitable or incorrect. E. Determination. All applications for rebates or refunds of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge will be determined by the General Manager of the District, or his designee, who, based on the submitted proof, may grant a full or partial rebate or refund. F. Administrative Fee. At the time of filing the application for rebate or refund, the property owner shall pay District an administrative fee for the processing of such application. The amount of the fee shall be equal to the total of all fees and charges imposed on the District by any other public entity, such as the Orange County Tax Collector, the Orange County Auditor, or the Orange County Recorder, in connection with the rebate or refund. Section 2.04. Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance shall be effective as of July 1 of each year, as set forth in Tables A and B, attached hereto, for the District's fiscal year, and shall remain in effect until such time as the rates adopted herein are changed by District Ordinance. There shall be no proration of such charges in any fiscal year. Section 2.05. Method of Collection. A. Pursuant to the authority granted by California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, and except as otherwise provided in Subparagraph 2.058 below, all sanitary sewer service charges established herein shall be collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with, and not separately from, its general taxes. The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to make said collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements between the County of Orange and the District. B. In the event District determines that, due to billing or payment error, or to inequity in the amount billed, a property owner has underpaid annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges payable to District, District, within four (4) years after the date of mailing of the tax bill, may: #178580: 12/11 /03 10 (1) collect the amount of any deficiency directly on the County Tax Roll; (2) off-set the amount of any deficiency against any amounts that District determines is owing, by District, to the property owner, as a rebate or refund under this Ordinance; or (3) submit, directly to the property owner, a bill for the amount of any deficiency, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the invoice date and which, if not paid, shall become a lien on said property. Section 2.06. Credit for Industrial Permittees. A credit shall be allowed to all dischargers permitted pursuant to Article 3 of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, in an amount equal to the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge established by Section 2.02 of this Ordinance, in the same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Sections 302.6(8), and 303.6(8) of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. TABLE A ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE USER FEES RESIDENTIAL USERS FISCAL YEAR 2003-04 2004-05 SFR MFR $100.00 $115.00 $ 70.00 $ 80.50 SFR =SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MFR= MUL Tl FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2005-06 $132.00 $ 92.40 2006-07 $153.00 $107.10 2007-08 $175.00 $122.50 All properties located within Revenue Area No. 14 pay no annual service fees. District costs relating to providing service to these properties are billed by OCSD directly to the Irvine Ranch Water District, the local agency providing the local sewer service. #178580:12111/03 11 Assessor Use Code 1 5 6 8 121 122 124 125 126 201 666 777 112 113 58 100 44 71 72 110 111 115 116 33 94 95 96 97 74 36 40 68 21 22 23 24 39 57 83 #178580: 12/11 /03 TABLE B ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Description Vacant Land Parcel Common Area Parcel "Hold" Parcel Equivalent to Vacant Parcel of Minimal or No Value Subsurface Parcels Oil/Mineral Rights Mineral Rights Equipment Vacant Comm. Area-IMP Alloc. Homeowners Exemption Add'I. Unassigned Vacant Septic Tank Property Steel Building Mini-Warehouse Nurseries (Plants) Drive-In Theater Lumber/Constr. Material Yard Parking Garage Paved Parking Lot Warehouse-Single Tenant Warehouse-Multi Tenant Recreational Vehicle Storage Truck Terminal Church Buildings Department Store Discount Store Unattached Single Store Strip Store Recreational Vehicle Park Financial Buildings Health Club High Rise Office Automobile Dealership Auto Repair Shop Automotive Service Used Car Lot Golf Course Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building Automotive Service Station 12 Percentage of SFR Per 1 .000 SF or Unit 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 7% 10% 10% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 20% 23% 23% 23% 23% 27% 27% 29% 30% 41% 41% 41% 41% 41% 41% 41% Assessor Use Code 84 86 65 66 67 69 7 55 107 108 109 114 37 101 26 45 88 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 63 64 81 82 98 99 118 19 34 42 43 56 #178580: 12111 /03 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Description Marine Service Station Percentage of SFR Per 1.000 SF or Unit 41% Combin. -Service Station/Convenience Single Office Bldgs. to 3 Stories Small Office Center Office Complex Converted Residence to Office Mobile Home Mobile Home Park Light Industrial -Single Tenant Light Industrial -Multi Tenant Research and Development Industrial Park Fraternal Buildings Unattached Theater Airport and Related Buildings Marinas Low Flow Shopping Center Two or More Residences Duplex Only Triplex Only 04-Units Only 5 to 16 Units 17 to 25 Units 26 to 40 Units Only 41-99 Units Only 100 or More Units Developed with a Mix of Forms Low Rise Retirement Building High Rise Retirement Building Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care Private Schools Store with Offices or Living Quarter Store with Office Upstairs Governmental Use Vacant/Develop. SFR with 1 or 2 rental units Dormitory Hospital Hotel Motels and Motor Hotels 13 41% 41% 41% 41% 41% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 51% 51% 53% 53% 53% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 82% 82% 82% 82% 82% 85% 97% 97% 97% 97% Assessor Use Code 0 2 4 85 103 104 105 106 119 120 888 32 38 60 61 62 28 92 50 51 52 53 54 89 20 35 73 30 47 48 90 76 77 78 79 29 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Description Conversion-C/1, Rural PC Percentage of SFR Per 1.000 SF or Unit 100% One Residence Miscellaneous Improvement Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage Food Processing Plant Cold Storage Plant Factory Public Utility Water Mutual or Company Conversion-Composite Prop. Cemetery & Related Buildings Funeral Home Nursing Home Convalescent Hospitals Converted Res. Used as Nursing Bowling Alleys Skating Rinks Single Medical Bldgs. to 3 Stories Small Medical Center Medical Center Complex High Rise Medical Converted Residence to Medical Average Flow Shopping Center Amusement Parks Entertainment Center Recreation Coin Operated Car Wash Supermarket Convenience Market High Flow Shopping Center Restaurant-Take Out Restaurant-Coffee Shop Restaurant -Dinner House Restaurant -Conversion from SF Conventional Car Wash 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 102% 102% 102% 112% 112% 124% 124% 124% 124% 124% 139% 144% 144% 144% 151% 151% 151% 226% 300% 600% 600% 600% 796% NOTE: Multiply the Table A Single Family Residential Rate by the percentage figure above in order to determine the rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. #178580: 12111 /03 14 ARTICLE Ill CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Section 3.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to impose Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly- connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 3.02. Definitions. A. "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing, planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair. B. "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non- discriminatory charge imposed at the time a building or structure is newly connected to the District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. This charge does not apply to temporary facilities or operations that are regulated under the provisions of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. C. "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to physically connect a property to the District's system, including but not limited to, installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines, and appurtenances to make the connection and which fee does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and overhead for the installation of those facilities. D. "Non-discriminatory'' means that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non- public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the proportionate share of use of those facilities. E. "Public agency'' means the United States or any of its agencies, the State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of #178580:12111/03 15 California, a county, city, district, school district, local or regional public authority, or any other political entity, subdivision or public corporation of the State. F. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as provided for in Sections 3.07, 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 of this Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly or annual basis, as determined by the District. Said charge is required to be paid by dischargers that exceed the maximum quantity of flow or constituents (BOD or SS) allowed as a base use for which the CFCC is paid. Section 3.03. Connection Permits: Required. A. Connection permits are required of each and every dwelling unit, and each commercial or industrial building, and structure connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to the District's facilities. Multiple detached structures on a single parcel of property shall each be required to obtain a connection permit. B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit under Sections 305 -305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01, or as amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit, as authorized above, may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. There will be a non-discriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained. Section 3.04. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No application for a permit for a connection of a structure to a District sewerage facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant, except as provided for discharges under a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said property. #178580: 12111 /03 16 Section 3.05. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment. A. Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District., or if none, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. B. Upon application of any property owner seeking to connect to the District's system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property. Section 3.06. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts. Every person or entity connecting any new or expanded building or structure to the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the applicable category of use set forth on Table C, below. #178580: 12/11 /03 17 TABLEC CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Use Category Commercial -Industrial Low Demand Average Demand High Demand Single Family Residential 5+ Bedrooms 4 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 2 Bedrooms 1 Bedroom Multi-Family Residential 4+ Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 2 Bedrooms 1 Bedroom Studio Rate Basis Per 1,000 square feet1 Per 1,000 square feet Per 1,000 square feet Per 1,000 square feet 1.39 1.19 1.00 0.81 0.62 1.08 0.89 0.70 0.50 0.32 Supplemental CFCC for Permit Users, includes 5% cost of funds. Flow, per million gallons per day BOD, per 1,000 pounds per day SS, per 1,000 pounds per day Base Charge $ 170.001 $ 1,05001 $2,490.001 $4,020.00 $3,440.00 $2,890.00 $2,340.00 $1,790.00 $3,120.00 $2,570.00 $2,020.00 $1,450.00 $ 920.00 $0.001001 $0.289100 $0.187150 1 Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be $2,890.00; and all calculations shall be on a 1,000 square foot, or portion thereof, basis. A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file in the Office of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building Department of each City within the District. *Low Demand connections are the following categories of Users: Nurseries; Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches; Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. **High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundries; Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants; Food Processing Facilities; Textile Manufacturers; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. ***All other connections are Average demand users. #178580: 12/11 /03 18 Section 3.07. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial-Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischargers- Definitions. A. A Significant Commercial -Industrial User ("SCIU") is any person or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but excluding domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") greater than 150 pounds per day, or Suspended Solids ("SS") greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Article 3, due to having federally or District regulated or significant discharges. B. A special purpose discharger (11 SPD 11 ) is any person or entity who discharges to the sewer system wastewater or process flow in an amount greater than 25,000 gpd (excluding domestic, industrial or commercial) and who is required to obtain a Special Purpose Discharge Permit as prescribed in Section 305 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01 or its successor. C. An Existing SCIU or SPD is any SCIU or SPD connected and discharging to the District's system prior to January 1, 2000. D. A New SCIU or SPD is any user who connects and discharges to the District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or after January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in Subparagraphs 3.07 A and B above, but, subsequent to January 1, 2000, increases flow, or BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU or SPD. E. The maximum discharge allowed to a user, for which a base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Table C, above, is 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base use"). Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this Subsection 3.07E shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 3.08 and 3.09 hereof. F. Each Existing SCI U shall have a baseline of allowed discharge of flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of January 1, 2000. The baseline shall be based upon the discharge for Fiscal Year 1998-99, or upon such other discharge data which the District determines is representative of the user's actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who are deemed to be SCIU's solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, pursuant to Section 3.07 A above, shall have a minimum baseline established as follows: Flow -25,000 gallons per day; BOD -150 pounds per day; and SS-150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to discharge flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. #178580:12/11/03 19 G. Each Existing SPD shall have a baseline of 25,000 gpd, 150 pounds per day of BOD and 150 pounds of SS. The Existing SPD shall be authorized to discharge flow up to 25,000 gpd without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. H. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed by Sections 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 below, shall be payable commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance. I. Within two (2) years from the date of the District's written notice to the existing SCIU of its baseline amounts, the existing SCIU, as described in Section 3.07C, shall have a right to appeal the District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the General Manager, or his designated representative, who shall have discretion, based upon extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager. The decision of the General Manager shall be final. Section 3.08. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial -Industrial Users. In addition to the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table C, for commercial-industrial use category properties, all New SCIU's shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound of BOD, or SS, exceeding the base use discharge maximums, in the amount shown in Table D. Section 3.09. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Purpose Dischargers. All New SPDs shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge of $0.001001 per gallon per day for each gallon of flow exceeding 25,000 gallons per day. Upon issue of permission to discharge, SPD with discharges above 25,000 gpd shall pay a nonrefundable Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, prior to discharge, for one million gallons above 25,000 gpd. The deposit will be credited by the District against future Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges. Section 3.10. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial-Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischargers. A. All Existing Significant Commercial -Industrial Users connected to and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either (i) an increase of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 25% per day over its established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or (ii) an increase #178580: 12/11 /03 20 of either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per day, whichever is lesser, over its established baseline authorization. B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in the following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in Section 3.1 OA above: TABLED SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Flow BOD SS Gallons Per Day Pounds Per Day Pounds Per Day Daily Charge $0.001001 $0.289100 $0.187150 C. All Existing SPDs connected and discharging to the sewer shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon occurrence of an increase of discharge flow over 25,000 gpd. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be $0.001001 per gallon per day of discharge for each gallon above 25,000 gpd. D. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the User's baseline or 25,000 gpd for SPDs. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for a year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District. Section 3.11. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C that would be for the prior category of use which was terminated and removed. Section 3.12. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the #178580:12111 /03 21 new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C for the prior category of use. Section 3.13. Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off- Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner, shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due, provided the original Agreement is still in force. The Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3.06 through 3.10 hereinabove, established for property connecting to said facilities. Section 3.14. No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid for the connection of a specific building or structure on a parcel of property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any other parcel of property. Section 3.15. Baseline Transferabilitv. The baseline of allowed discharge of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such previously existing baseline be provided to another SCIU concurrently or subsequently occupying the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in accordance with Section 3.08 above. ARTICLE IV MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS. SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to recover those costs incurred by the District (i) on account of industrial dischargers' and wastehaulers' use of the District's facilities; (ii) when administering the District's Source Control Program; and (iii) when performing non-compliance sampling of industrial wastewater dischargers who have violated the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations or the terms and conditions of the discharger's permit. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used to defray the costs incurred by the District (i) on account of such use of the District's facilities; and (ii) in performing these tasks. #178580:12111/03 22 Section 4.02. Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees. Administrative fees and charges relating to permittees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table E, below. Section 4.03. Source Control Non-Compliance Fees. Source control non-compliance fees are hereby established for dischargers' non- compliance sampling and for self-monitoring and data reporting non-compliance, in the sum or sums as set forth in Table F, below. Section 4.04. Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 305.5 and 305.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, charges for use are hereby established for Special Purpose Discharge Permittees, as set forth in Table G, below Section 4.05. Class I and Class II Permittees -Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 302.3, 302.6, 303.3 and 303.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for Class I and Class 11 Permittees as set forth in Table G, below. Section 4.06. Wastehauler Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 306.3 and 306.7 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for wastehaulers as set forth in Table H, below. Section 4.07. Administrative Appeals. A. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any decision, action, or determination by the District may, within forty-five (45) days of the date of mailing by the District of the initial invoice for fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance, request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees. Following review of such a request, the District shall notify the user, permit applicant, or perrnittee by certified mail of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. B. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by the District's decision on the reconsideration request, may file an appeal in accordance with Sections 617 and 619 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. #178580: 12111 /03 23 TABLE E ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITTEES Permit Fees A. B. C. D. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit Special Purpose Discharge Permit -One-Time Application -Nonrefundable Deposit for First One Million Gallons -New Permit Only Wastehauler Discharge Permit Wastehauler Fees F. G. H. I. J. K. Permit Decal Initial Issue Permit Decal Replacement Entry Card Initial Issue Entry Card Replacement After Hours Discharge -Prearranged After Hours Discharge -Emergency Administrative/Processing Fees L. M. N. District's Collection of Tax Data District's Collection of Water Consumption Data Appeal Hearing Filing Fee #178580:12/11/03 24 Charges $335.00/year $70.00/year $250.00/year $975.00/permit $316.38 $75.00/year Charges $25.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $85.00/event $100.00/event Charges $100.00/permit $100.00/permit $400/appeal TABLE F INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Minor Violation Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Major Violation Cost of Analysis Heavy Metals: -Aluminum -Antimony -Arsenic -Cadmium -Chromium -Copper -Gold -Lead -Molybdenum -Nickel -Palladrum -Platinum -Selenium -Silver -Thallium -Zinc Mercury 601/602 604 606 608 610 #178580: 12111 /03 25 Charge $225.00/event $500.00/event Charge $35.00/each $78.00 $152.00 $223.00 $254.00 $523.00 $73.00 TABLE F (CONTINUED) INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES 612 624 625 Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) BOD and Suspended Solids (SS) Analysis Chemical Oxygen Demand Conductivity Cyanide (Amenable) Dissolved Mineral Solids Gamma Radiation Determination Gross Alpha and Beta Determination Tritium Determination Oil & Grease (Hexane Soluble Matter) Oil & Grease (Mineral Partition) Total Organic Nitrogen pH Fluoride Suspended Solids (Total) Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) Total Dissolved Solids Total Sulfides Charge $200.00 $355.00 $661.00 $ 21.00 $ 44.00 $ 67.00 $ 44.00 $ 15.00 $ 70.00 $ 15.00 $115.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 74.00 $ 74.00 $ 48.00 $ 8.00 $ 51.00 $ 23.00 $ 44.00 $ 14.00 $ 29.00 SELF-MONITORING AND DATA REPORTING NON-COMPLIANCE Cost of Processing and Issuing Significant Non-Compliance Notification Cost of Processing Annual SNC and Publication #178580: 12/11 /03 26 $165.00 $260.00 TABLEG CLASS I AND CLASS II PERMITTEES AND SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITTEES CHARGES FOR USE Class I and II Permit User FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 Flow(*) $316.38 $368.58 $429.40 $500.25 B.O.D. (**) $216.13 $248.55 $285.83 $328.71 S.S. (***) $207.35 $238.45 $274.22 $315.35 Domestic Equivalent $100.00 $115.00 $132.00 $153.00 SQecial PurQose Discharge Permit Flow(*) B.O.D. (**) S.S. (***) Domestic Equivalent (*) Flow (**) 8.0.D. (***)S.S. FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 $316.38 $368.58 $429.40 $500.25 $216.13 $248.55 $285.83 $328.71 $207.35 $238.45 $274.22 $315.35 $100.00 $115.00 $132.00 $153.00 Per million gallons of Flow Per thousand pounds of Biochemical Oxygen Demand Per thousand pounds of Suspended Solids FY 2007-08 $582.79 $378.01 $362.66 $175.00 FY 2007-08 $582.79 $378.01 $362.66 $175.00 All properties located within Revenue Area No. 14 pay no annual service fees. District costs relating to providing service to these properties are billed by OCSD directly to the Irvine Ranch Water District, the local agency providing the local sewer service. #178580:12111 /03 27 TABLE H WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE Wastehauler Fees Charge for Use -Waste originating within Orange County Charge for Use-Waste originating outside Orange County #178580: 12111 /03 28 Charges $0.035/gallon of truck capacity $0.11/gallon of truck capacity ARTICLEV MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01. Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be in addition to the provisions of District Ordinance No. OCSD- 01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District's Sewage Facilities, including provisions for payment of charges or fees related thereto; District Ordinance No. OCSD-03, as amended, Establishing Fees Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and any other District Ordinances and Resolutions not in conflict herewith. Section 5.02. Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax-exempt organizations, except as expressly provided herein. The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does further hereby ORDAIN: Section II. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section Ill. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect -------- Section IV. Repeal. Ordinance No. OCSD-20 is hereby repealed. Section V. Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. #178580: 12111 /03 29 PASSED AND ADOPTED by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held _______ _ CHAIR, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ATTEST: SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT GENERAL COUNSEL #178580: 12/11 /03 30