Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2003-05-28
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT May 21, 2003 phone: (714)962-2411 NOTICE OF MEETING fax: (714)962-0356 www.ocsd.com BOARD OF DIRECTORS mailingOBo 8127 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 street address: WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2003 — 7:00 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Member 10844 Ellis Avenue Agencies Fountain Valley, California 92708 Cities The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Ana Brea District will be held at the above location, time and date. Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton / Garden Grove ✓ Huntington Beach 1 Irvine bard Se ary La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 4, 2003 at 5:00 p.m. County of Orange PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, June 5, 2003 at 5:00 p.m. Sanitary Districts JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Costa Mesa SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, June 9, 2003 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD Midway City Water Districts FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 11, 2003 at 5:00 p.m. Irvine Ranch STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 25, 2003 at 5:00 p.m. To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. b b BOARD MEETING DATES Board Meeting June 25, 2003 July 23, 2003 August 27, 2003 September 24, 2003 October 22, 2003 *November 19, 2003 *December 17, 2003 January 28, 2004 February 25, 2004 March 24, 2004 April 28, 2004 May 26, 2004 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month GAwp.dta\admin\SS\Agenda\2003 Meeting NodceMN5.2.doc i NO. 2 OF 3 CHAIR'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF MAY 28, 2003 DURING TONIGHT'S MEETING, THE BOARD WILL BE ASKED TO MAKE VITAL DECISIONS ABOUT OCSD'S FUTURE. SINCE 1999, WHEN THE LAST STRATEGIC PLAN WAS ACCEPTED, WE'VE BEEN ON A JOURNEY TO COMPLETE PROJECTS TO INCREASE THE LEVEL OF TREATMENT TO FULL SECONDARY STANDARDS, CREATE A RELIABLE WATER SUPPLY THROUGH GWRS, AS WELL AS MAINTAINING, REPLACING AND CONSTRUCTING FACILITIES THAT ARE CRITICAL TO OUR OPERATION. NOW WE NEED TO DECIDE HOW TO PAY FOR THIS PLAN. WE NEED TO CONSIDER ALL OF THE ALTERNATIVES AS WE BEGIN TO DEBATE THE USER RATE THAT IS NEEDED TO PUT THIS PLAN INTO EFFECT. I HOPE YOU WILL CONSIDER FUTURE GENERATIONS THAT INCLUDE YOUR GRANDCHILDREN AND WHAT THEY WILL NEED TO MAINTAIN A CLEAN WATER ENVIRONMENT. WE ARE HERE BECAUSE OUR CITIES GAVE US THE OPPORTUNITY TO REPRESENT THEIR INTERESTS, AND WE MUST TAKE OUR JOBS VERY SERIOUSLY AS WE MAKE THESE DECISIONS. SHIRLEY Da YOU WANT TO ALSO ADD THE FOLLOWING INVITATION TO THE DIRECTORS?: SINCE THE ORANGE COUNTY REGIST PRINTED AN ARTICLE LAST WEEK ABOUT THE PROPOS D RATE INCREASE, I KNOW BOARD MEMBERS HAVE BEEN CEIVING CALLS FROM THEIR CONSTITUENTS. WOULD Y U LIKE TO SHARE WITH THE OTHER BOARD MEMBERS TH IND OF QUESTIONS YOU'VE BEEN RECEIVING? THE MEETING SCHEDULE FOR THE NEXT MONTH SHOWS: A. WbNESDAY, JUNE 4T", OMTS COMMITTEE MEETING STARTING AT 5 P.M. B. THURS, AY, JUNE 5T", PDC COMMITTEE MEETING STAR NG AT 5 P.M. C. WEDNESD �Y, JUNE 11T", FAHR COMMITTEE MEETING \STARTING AT 5 P.M. D. AND THE STEERING COMMITTEE AND BOARD MEETINGS AR ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25T", AT 5 AND 7 P.M., RE ' PECTIVELY. NO. 3OF3 REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2003, AT 5 P.M. 1 .vTHE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 23, 2003 MEETING WERE REVIEWED AND APPROVED. 2. XREPORTED ON THE PROGRESS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY AD HOC COMMITTEE. WE CONTINUE TO MEET BI-WEEKLY WITH STAFF TO ADVISE THEM AND OUR CONSULTANTS ON THE SACRAMENTO AND WASHINGTON, DC, INITIATIVES WE ARE PURSUING. 3. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. BLAKE PROVIDED AN OVERVIEW OF THE UNIFYING STRATEGIES THAT HE AND THE EMT HAVE CREATED OVER THE LAST FOUR MONTHS THAT SUPPORT THE ACTIONS THAT THE BOARD HAS TAKEN IN THE LAST YEAR. AFTER HEARING THEM, THE STEERING COMMITTEE F TO t� B. BLAKE ALSO REPORTED THAT DIRECTOR COOK HAS SUGGESTED THAT A ROUND OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS BE HELD AT THE CONFERENCE FACILITIES OF THE IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT IN THE SAN JOAQUIN MARSH-COMMONLY CALLED "THE DUCK CLUB". THE REASON IS SO THAT THE BOARD CAN VIEW IRWD'S TREATMENT WETLANDS UP CLOSE. THIS COULD BE ONE OF THE TECHNOLOGIES WE USE IN THE FUTURE TO MANAGE URBAN RUNOFF. THE STEERING COMMITTEE DECIDED THAT 4. OUR GENERAL COUNSEL REPORTED ON THE FOLLOWING: ,V- 5. UNDER DISCUSSION ITEMS, THE STEERING COMMITTEE REVIEWED THE PROPOSED DEAL POINTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF THE IRVINE BUSINESS COMPLEX AND THE TUSTIN MARINE CORPS AIR STATION SERVICE AREAS FROM REVENUE AREA 7 TO REVENUE AREA 14. THE STEERING COMMITTEE ASKED THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE PDC COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION BY THE BOARD 6. THE STEERING COMMITTEE REVIEWED THE AGENDA ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR PRESENTATION AT THE JUNE COMMITTEE MEETINGS 7. AND FINALLY, THE STEERING COMMITTEE MET IN CLOSED SESSION ON Li ITEMS, F WHICH WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF A CLOSED SESSION LATER TONIGHT BY THE FULL BOARD. � _ NO. 1 OF 3 REPORT TO THE STEERING COMMITTEE MAY 28, 2003 1. REPORT ON PROGRESS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY AD HOC COMMITTEE: 1 . FEDERAL FUNDING SUPPORT FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT. REPRESENTATIVES CHRIS COX AND LORETTA SANCHEZ ARE COMMITTED TO SUPPORTING OCSD'S EFFORT TO SECURE $3 MILLION IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS. DURING THE AMSA MEETING IN WASHINGTON, D.C., LAST WEEK, BLAKE ANDERSON MET WITH STAFF MEMBERS FROM CONG. COX AND SANCHEZ, SEN. FEINSTEIN, AND HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE AND WE HAVE THEIR SUPPORT FOR OUR $3 MILLION FUNDING REQUEST FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT. OUR STAFF CONTINUES TO SEEK LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM THE LOCAL COMMUNITY INCLUDING BUSINESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERESTS. A SPECIAL NOTE OF THANKS TO MRS. JOAN IRVINE SMITH WHO WROTE A LETTER LAST WEEK TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION URGING THEIR SUPPORT OF THE DISTRICT'S REQUEST. 2. ACA 10 - STORMWATER FEE EXEMPTION FROM PROPOSITION 218. THIS AMENDMENT PASSED OUT OF TWO POLICY COMMITTEES IN THE ASSEMBLY, AND IT NOW FACES APPROVAL BY THE ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE. BY THE TIME OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE, IT SHOULD BE KNOWN WHETHER THE AMENDMENT PASSED OUT OF SUSPENSE AND MOVED TO THE FULL ASSEMBLY FOR A VOTE. SUPPORTERS ARE STILL SEEKING THE NECESSARY VOTES TO MOVE IT TO THE SENATE. THERE IS CONCERN ABOUT HAVING ANOTHER "FEE" BILL IN THE STATE LEGISLATURE DURING THESE DIFFICULT BUDGET TIMES. 3. AB 1427 - BIOSOLIDS. THIS BILL, AS AMENDED, REQUIRES THE STATE TO CONDUCT A STUDY NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE BENEFICIAL REUSE OF CLASS A BIOSOLIDS BY LAND APPLICATION. THIS BILL WAS CAUGHT IN THE APPROPRIATIONS SUSPENSE FILE BECAUSE IT REQUIRES THE STATE TO SPEND ABOUT $200,000 TO PERFORM THE STUDY. LANGUAGE WAS ADDED TO THE BILL TO HAVE OCSD PAY FOR THE COST OF THE STUDY IN ORDER TO MOVE IT OUT OF SUSPENSE TO THE ASSEMBLY FLOOR. STAFF WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE AUTHOR, CASA AND OTHERS AS THE BILL MOVES THROUGH THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS TO PROVIDE A FAIR SHARE ALLOCATION OF THE COSTS AMONG BIOSOLIDS PRODUCERS IN THE STATE. 4. AB 496 - SANTA ANA RIVER CONSERVANCY. OCSD STAFF IS PLANNING TO MEET WITH ASSEMBLY MEMBER LOU CORREA TO DISCUSS HIS BILL. CONCERNS HAVE BEEN RAISED ABOUT THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE CONSERVANCY AND THE POTENTIAL TO SIPHON AWAY LIMITED STATE FUNDING FROM OTHER IMPORTANT SANTA ANA RIVER (SAR) PROJECTS. THE MEMBERSHIP IS HEAVILY WEIGHTED WITH BOTH STATE AGENCIES AND UPSTREAM INTERESTS. AND THERE ARE IMPORTANT ONGOING SAR PROJECTS WHICH ARE IN LINE FOR STATE FUNDING INCLUDING GWR SYSTEM, SARI LINE RELOCATION, AND THE RAISING OF PRADO DAM. rrSAiV/1/JPL-'2A, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority COMMISSION FOR THE PROJECT AUTHORITY EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT May 23, 2003 GENERAL MANAGER P.JOSEPH GRINDSTAFF Ms. Shirley McCraken Orange County Sanitation District PO Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Dear Ms. McCraken: I am very pleased to announce that the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA) has joined with the major water agencies and stakeholders of the region to jointly host the "State of the Watershed" Conference and Awards Banquet. This first annual event is being held at the historic Mission Inn in Riverside(an event program and registration form are enclosed). I am even more pleased to announce that Orange County Sanitation District will be receiving the Drought Proofing Award recognizing your collaborative work with the Orange County Water District on the significant efforts and innovation on the Groundwater Replenishment System. The Awards banquet is scheduled for Thursday evening, June 5. Public television personality Huell Howser will be the Banquet's Master of Ceremonies as we honor Orange County Sanitation District and other individuals and organizations who have demonstrated remarkable progress and a true commitment to advancing the maximum efficiency of our watershed. The conference will take place throughout the day on Friday,June 6 and will feature panel discussions from numerous leaders from throughout the watershed including Riverside County Supervisor Marion Ashley, Assemblyman Lou Correa, Western Growers Association President A.G. Kawamura and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board member John Withers, to name just a few. As the conference is jointly hosted by the leading water agencies in the region, we expect to have maximum attendance from a broad spectrum of stakeholders integral to a constructive discussion of water issues. Seating is limited so please utilize the enclosed registration form or for more information call (888) 857-7932 or online at www.sawpa.org. 11615 Sterling Avenue,Riverside,CA 92503-4979 • (909)354-4220 Administration FAX(909)785-7076 • Planning FAX(909)352-3422 r i Your attendance at the banquet to accept the award is very important and we would greatly appreciate you encouraging your colleagues and associates who are involved with the Orange County Sanitation District to attend as well. We will be happy to reserve a table of 10 on your behalf at the front of the room. Please contact us at (888)857-7932 to confirm your attendance and reservation. Thank you for your continued leadership and support in securing the water future for Southern California Sincerely, Jo n ff General Manager ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 05/28/03 TIME: 7:00 P.M. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................__'z_,,- (WILSON) ........................ BANKHEAD...................�L —� (MILLER) .......................... BRADY ........................�� (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ................... ✓ _,� (AMBRIZ).......................... CAVECCHE................... ✓ `l 5�3U3 yip (GARCIA) ......................... CHRISTY..................... ✓ —� (CRANDALL).................... COLLINS ...................... ✓ �� (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE.............. (BROADWATER) ............. DALTON....................... ,. 13`ll3 CCi (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE..................... f-5 (WILSON)........................ DUVALL...................... (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ _,� (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... (POE)................................ JEMPSA...................... ✓ �� (DAVERT)......................... KAWASHIMA............... (SHEA) ............................. KROM........................ (DOW) ............................. MARSHALL.................. (HERNANDEZ)................. MC CRACKEN............... (FRESCHI) ....................... MC GOWAN ................. (BEAUMAN) ..................... MOORE........................ (EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER.............. (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ ✓ �� (WEBB) ............................ RIDGEWAY................... (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... (HERMAN)....................... - STAFF: LI Anderson Beekman Ghirelli Kyle Ludwin Mathews Miles Ooten Tomko Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Nixon 05/20/03 G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\DIRECTOR\Directors Roll Call.doc �P ' ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 05/28/03 j '/TIME: 7:00 P.M. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON............1 ... 0 (WILSON) ........................ BANKHEAD................... (MILLER) .......................... BRADY ........................ (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ................... t/ (AMBRIZ).......................... CAVECCHE.................... (GARCIA) ......................... CHRISTY..................... _ /y (CRANDALL).................... COLLINS (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE.............. (BROADWATER) ............. DALTON....................... c� (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE.....................Y_ (W ILSON)........................ DUVALL...................... A) (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE.................. (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... (POE)................................ JEMPSA...................... t� (DAVERT)......................... KAWASHIMA............... �— (SHEA) ............................. KROM........................ (DOW) ............................. MARSHALL.................. N (HERNANDEZY-:' n............. MC CRACKEN............... _ (FRESCHI) ....................... MC GOWAN ................. Y (BEAUMAN) ..................... MOORE........................ (EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER.............. _) (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ \i (WEBB) ............................ RIDGEWAY................... -/ (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... 6L/ (HERMAN)........................ ....................... STAFF: J j Anderson l Beekman Ghirelli Kyle Ludwin Mathews Miles Ooten Tomko Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Nixon 05/20/03 G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\DIRECTOR\Directors Roll Call.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (3FORES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting ford ibu DATE: S- —G AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) �1/y?/A -i- (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 0'f) 1 24 — &t 7 REPRESENTING: I :: - / (self/name f-rganization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. c / 17DATE: J � � 3 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: K130 BEl u o/(4un-s't (number/street) , 11 / (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ) REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Lo � AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) l i TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 12— AGENDA ITEM NO. / i NAME: (please print) 'A'' HOME ADDRESS: V �- (n mber/street) • cel-I (city/zip code TELEPHONE: ou REPRESENTING: �,e�P (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 1"l -u j AGENDA ITEM NO. * * * * * * * * * (*)* * *+* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NAME: (please print) KU HOME ADDRESS: 102-6 HAG -LA (` O (number/street) J & L4, CA q'0-7 y b - 42--, (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 6vL) q 3U 'L 4 7� REPRESENTING: (selfffiam6 of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: L AGENDA ITEM NO. f NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: I 2-o (number/street) (city/zip code)TELEPHONE: ( ��') ^2 q REPRESENTING: S (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. I NAME: (please print) 14 ae L. HOME ADDRESS: 36 7 C - �T 5� . (number/street) : -/ A, (On (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( �'`� ) C ' 7 REPRESENTING: �'�Y �°uh l S`` n 4 4�1 (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. IN DATE: l NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: z- � — (number street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( ` � REPRESENTING: 0 6 (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) ! HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: �) REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: L v AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) AV 6/ C At HOME ADDRESS: l (number/ treet) (city/zi code) 7 TELEPHONE: ( l�) REPRESENTING: L (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: - � AGENDA ITEM NO. l'T NAME: (please print) 14W i�at�J V Fes` ,� 64E-: T— HOME ADDRESS: (nu bier/street) 4 (city/zip code) 99 TELEPHONE: � c. REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) b(1 KANPY Fart m Alike adc-y-e- .1 -5-41 A- C) 0 U;Ak6—JoZ7vc- eg FLU �)� � 4TI3 re Ll---,Z, ltli� iL-Ily� fez � L� va H:\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\SIGN-IN FORM.DOC SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM (please print) lease print) o crvs Gc�ju-f H:\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\SIGN-IN FORM.DOC Good evening Chairperson and Board of Directors. I am speaking tonight in hope of getting answers to these two questions, 1 . Why the notice the OCSD sent to the public says" During the past year the OCSD Board voted to provide disinfection and secondary treatment to all of the wastewater discharged into the ocean. This has increased annual operating costs nearly 7 million and has increased the 10 year capital improvement program to 2.1 billion. A sewer rate increase is required to pay for these changes." We all know that the District is not planning on implementing any full secondary work until the year 2007. This increase starts in 2004 Second question 2. In 2007 when you do implement the full secondary work the Pac 2 meetings proved that the cost to the taxpayers for going to full secondary will only cost the ratepayers $30 a year or 152 million increase in the whole Capital Improvement Program . I think the OCSD should do whatever can be done to correct this unjustified claim. You are making going to full secondary the scapegoat for this rate increase. The rate increase is caused by commitments you had made for the Groundwater Replenishment Program and other work to get the District's facilities up to standards. �/ .1' � ?1�i' ^642%5 /7 . Al�y� ;iA ". COMPARISuN AGENCIES - RETIREMENT BENEFIT CONFIOINTIAL -5 1""�eIL3Attachmentl RETIREMENT BENEFITS r---------------------------------------•-------------------------_r------------_-------------r---»----»---»-»»---_ Employer Paid ; Employer Paid ; Employee Paid COMPARISON AGENCY ;AGENCY ;Formula ; (Employer Contribution) ; (Employee Contribution) , Contribution City of Anaheim ,PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% ; 7% ; 0% ------------------------------- ---------------------------- --------------------------r-----------------------------»------»»»»»-----. City of Garden Grove ;PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% 0% 8°� -------------------------------------------t--------------------------t-------------------------------------------t--------------------------t-------------------------- r---»---------»-^------. City of Huntington Beach ;PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% ; 7% 0% -------------------------------------------t--------------------------r-------------------------------------------t--------------------------t-------------------------- t----»--«-_»»»_------. City of Irvine ,American Express ;City contributes 15%of base salary ; 15% 0% ; 0% I ;into a Defined Contribution Plan ;Will be switching to PERS 7/03 with 21.113% 2.552% ; 5.448% I I2.7%@ 55 ------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------------- --------- ------------- Central Contra Costa Sanitary District "CCCERA ;2%@ 57.5,eff 07/03 2% @ 55 ; 17_16%° ; 7.57% ; 0% -------------------------------------------t--------------------------t-------------------------_-----------------t--------- ---------t--------------------------r-------------------------. County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles ;PERS ;2%@55 0% 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------t-------------------------------------------t--------------------------t--------------------------t---------»--------------- East Bay Municipal Utility District ;EBMUDERS ; 16.78% 0% 4.22% -------------------------------------------t--------------------------r-------------------------------------------+--------------------------t--------------------------t----_-----------»-------. Eastern Municipal Water District ;PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% ; 7% ; 0% -------------t-------------------------- r-------------------------------------------♦ --------------------------►-------------------------- t---»--------_------------ Irvine Ranch Water District ;PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% ; 7% ; 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------♦--------------------------t--------------------------r----------»--- ----- City of San Diego ;CERS ,2.5%@ 55 ; 9.83% 5.4% 10.01% -------------------------------------------t--------------------------r-------------------------------------------t--------------------------t--------------------------t-----------�------_----_ Orange County Water District ;Private ;Defined Contribution Plan ; 7.65% ; 3% ; 4.65% -------------------------------------------t--------------------------t-------------------------------------------•--------------------------t--------------------------►-------------------------- City of Los Angeles ;LACERS ;2.16%@ 55 8.53% 0% 6.00% -------------------------------------------t--------------------------►-------------------------------------------t--------------------------r----------------------------------------------------- County of Los Angeles :LACERS I 7%to 8% I 0% varies based on entry age Information Collected 04.03 SERVICE Akr-A AGENCIES - RETIREMENT BENEFITS Attachment 2 RETIREMENT BENEFITS r-------------------------------------------*--------------------------T--------------------------r-------------------------- Employer Paid ', Employer Paid ', Employee Paid SERVICE AREA AGENCY ;AGENCY ;Formula ; (Employer Contribution) ; (Employee Contribution) ; Contribution City of Anaheim 1,PERS 12%@ 55 0% 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------*--------------------------r--------------------------r"'----'------------------ City of BreaPERS '2%@ 55 0% 7.49% 0% -------------------------------------------*--------------------------r-------------------------------------------*--------------------------r--------------------------r------"-'---'------------ City of Buena Park (PERS f2%@ 55 0% 7% 0% --_--____'----'---------------------------'r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------•--------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------- City of Cypress ;PERS 12%@ 55 0% ; 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------I--------------------------r-----------7-------------- City of Fountain Valley IPERS 112%@ 55 0% 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r----------------""""'-r"-""'-"-"-'---------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------------r-'--__-----_-------------- City of Fullerton PERS :2%@ 55 7% 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------•--------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------- City of Garden Grove ;PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% ; 1% 7% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------•--------------------------r--------------------------r---------;--0"---------- City of Huntington Beach ;PERS ;2%@ 55 0% 7% 0% ------_'-_--_'--'---'----------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------- City of Irvine ;American Express ;City contributes 15%of base salary 15% ; 0% 0% ;into a Defined Contribution Plan ;Will be switching to PERS 7/03 with 21.1 13% ; 2.552% ; 5.448% 12.7%@ 55 I -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------- City of La Habra ;PERS 12%@ 55 ; 0%,eff 07/03 2.63% ; 7% ; 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------*--------------------------r--------------------------r------------------------- City of La Palma ;PERS ;2%@ 55(2.7%@ 55 eff 01/04) ; 0% 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------------r-""-"------'---------- City of Los Alamitos ;PERS ;2.7%@ 55 ; 0% ; 8% 0% -------------------------------------------r-------------------------'r---___-------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------- ------------------------_ City of Newport Beach ;PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% i 7% 0% ------------'------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------•--------------------------r--------------------------r-'-""'----"----------' City of Orange ;PERS ;2%@ 55(2.7%@ 55 eff 06/03) 0%,eff 07/03 2.47% ; 7%,eff 07/03 8% ; 0% -------------------------------------------r-----------------__-------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------'r------'--'---'-__-'-_-'-_ City of Placentia ;PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% ; 7% ; 0.0049% ---------_'-"-----------------------------r--------------------------r'----'-'-'---------------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------------r------------------------- City of Santa Ana ;PERS ;2%@ 55 0% 7% 0% ---'---------------------------------------r--------------------------►-------------------------------------------r-------_"'---------------I--------------------------I------------------------' City of Seal Beach ;PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% ; 7% ; 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------•--------------------------r'_--_---------'---------- City of Stanton PERS 12%@ 55 0% 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------•-------------------------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------------r---""--'--'-"--------' City of Tustin ;PERS ;2%@ 55 -------------------------------------------*--------------------------r--"'-"---"'-----------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------------►------------------------' City of Villa Park ;PERS ,2%@ 55 7% 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------------r--------__-_------------' City of Yoiba Linda PERS :2%@ 55 0% 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------------r_____________________-_-_ Costa Mesa Sanitary District ;PERS 12%@ 55 0% ; 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------•--------------------------r----------------------------------------------------- Midway City Sanitary District ;PERS ;2%@ 55 0% ; 7% 0% -------------------------------------------r--------------------------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------r--------------------'1---'r-------------'----------- Irvine Ranch Water District ;PERS ;2%@ 55 ; 0% 7% 0% ----------'-__'-_---"---------------------I--------------------------r-------------------------------------------r--------------------------•--------------------------r--'-----"--"-'--------- County Board of Supervisors IOCERS ;Tier I-2%@ 57,Tier II-2%@ 61 I 5.66% Information Collected 04.03 hment RETIREMENT BENEFIT ANNUAL COSTS Salary of $40,833,000 AVERAGE REF ALTERNATIVE PLAN DESIGNS DISTRICT MEMBER TOTAL ;1 Current Formulas, ,Baselines' 566 °i{{{° ` K ,`T7°° �� Lr ">�� C r 2. "DISTRICT':doesriot;include 4:50 iece,onembercontnbtttion �x $ rcT3'11 OOQ �$ `3; ; 3;000 low 3 Tier 1,2.0% @ 57, FAE 1, Past& Future Service, District Pays Shortfall 14.70% 5.60% 20.30% 4 Increase in rate over current rate 9.04% -2.17% 6.87% 5 Cost of change $ 3,691,000 $ (886,000) $ 2.805,000 ®�55ffAE+3;Past&�F t re a ce D st a S o a I �' 8 07%- E$ ;Z , 7 Increase in rate:over curr 41 °.nge $ 84 0 . 81 •� �U j 9 2% @ 55, FAE 1, Past& Future Service, District Pays Shortfall' 8.70% 9.40% 18.10% 10 Increase in rate over current rate 3.04% 1.63% 4.67% 11 ICost of change $ 1.241,000 $ 666,000 $ 1,907.000 '2% Q 55 is not available through OCERS, but is PIERS benchmark 1AConl FAFiR\Relirement Bonelil Costs FAHR Attach 05-03.xts 5!7/2003 i � 1y SANlT,�T�oN W � O 2 � � c 9 4 90 !�i 42 THE May 28, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress Data on the level of treatment progress and its impacts on the final effluent are attached. Historical trends for final effluent percent of secondary treatment for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids are shown. In addition, current data for the month's BOD, suspended solids and disinfection effectiveness is shown on a schematic of the treatment system. The Operations division has all of the operationally available secondary treatment facilities online. The Operations divisions continue to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. The final effluent is a blend of 64% secondary treatment and 36% primary treatment, which equals our target of 64% secondary treatment. The decrease is due to taking the trickling filter secondary facilities offline, which is explained below. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During May 2003, we have averaged 36 ppm TSS and 63 ppm BOD. The secondary treatment goal is 30130 ppm BOD and TSS. The final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility's disinfection system, which has been in operation for seven months. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. May 2003 results to date for total coliform averaged about 10,300 MPN/100 ml down from an average bacteria level in the final effluent of 25,000,000 MPN/100 ml prior to disinfection. The final effluent had a maximum 0.29 ppm chlorine residual averaged over six hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm compliance limit. Up to date daily and 30-day average bacteria data is reported on the Web @ www.ocsd.com. A future feature of the data presented on the Web will be an explanation of spikes in data. A spike of 160,000 MPN/100 ml total coliform occurred on Saturday, May 17, 2003. The bacteria spike did not exceed the operating goal, but was higher than we normally experience. Staff analysis determined that chlorine residual numbers on all streams were being met, but that high total suspended solids from Reclamation Plant No. 1 reduced the effectiveness of disinfection on one of the three plant areas being disinfected, which resulted in the higher than normal number. The Board approved the permanent bleach/dechlorination (dechlor)facilities in January 2003 and construction will be completed in the fall of 2003. The permanent bleach and dechlorination facilities will be used until Engineering determines the future technology to be used for disinfection and then designs and constructs the new facilities. i OCSD 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 0 (714)962-2411 ti On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, the over 30 year-old trickling filter secondary treatment process at Plant No. 1 was removed from service. A contractor will remove the existing filters and rebuild new trickling filters over the next 2 and one-half years. Duringthis time period, the amount of secondary treatment will be reduced. The percent secondary treatment versus primary effluent that makes up the final effluent will be 63 to 64%. The removal of secondary treatment will cause the reported TSS and BOD to rise slightly also. A consequence of taking the trickling filters out of service has been a proliferation of filter flies (moths). The Operations division normally controls the fly population using Vector Control. We were using Vector Control up until the Memorial Day weekend. Over the weekend, the flies hatched in high numbers. In hind site, our error in the shutdown plan was not to hire a private company to continue the spraying at the trickling filter site. Spraying has been resumed by Vector Control, which will reduce the fly population to normal where they can be contained in the middle of Plant No. 1. At present, they are in high enough numbers to be a nuisance in and around the Administration area. They can be a nuisance by flying into your eyes, ears or nose. Be aware and try not to inhale them. RJO:pjm G:1wp.dta\om18101FINALIRJOIBOARD Handouts10423031M-042303 Board Packet Cover Letter.doc Attachments (2) I S11°Ir�rr Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels b Cq Revision 5/28/03 THE M� Final Effluent 75% Percent Secondary Treatment 72% 70% Winter 2002 Goal.=64% - 68% 69% 68% 67% 66° 65% 64% �Mont�hlyAve�ragee 63% 60% 58% 1% 56% 57% 55% 54% 6% 54% 52% �% 50% 45% 12-Month Running Average 40% Liar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr rday 2002 2003 Total Suspended SolidsjTSS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) PPIn in Final Effluent PPO1 in Final Effluent too too 1998 Permit imi =11JU ppm 90 -- 90 80 _ 80 73 73 73 70 69 70 70 _ _ 70 65 .-....... 63 1998 Permit Limit=60 ppm 60 58 60 sa 60 60 .. 56 56 6 50 50 47 48 46 - AB 45 43 50 40 _ _ 37 36 .35............36. 37 34....... 36 40 33 30 30 Secondary Standard Goal=30 ppm 0 Secondary Standard Goal=30 ppm zo ._ 2 10 - _ _ 10 0 0 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 2002 2003 2002 2003 MjV A r Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Last Fiscal Year 2001 -02 Progress to Secondary Standards Ending June 2002 Month: May 2003 47% 36% Advanced Advanced Primary Ocean Pipeline Primary Ocean Pipeline Water Water Disinfection& Mixed Mixed Dechlorination 53% 64% °rYI1M Aug 12,2002 Secondary Final Effluent: Secondary BOD = 72 ppm Bacteria Reduction: 99.999/o Goal: 99.7% Reduction TSS = 51 ppm Chlorine Level Ocean Discharge Daily Maximum: 0.29 mg/L Permit Limit: Daily Maximum 1.45 mg/L BOD = 100 ppm (Average of Eight Samples) TSS = 60 ppm Final Effluent: Final Effluent Go BOD = 63 ppm BOD = 30 ppm TSS = 36 ppm TSS = 30 ppm 0 4�JNR SANII,r'O�O e3 :_ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT i y 1 9 ff May 27, 2003 phone: (714)962-2411 MEMORANDUM fax: (714)962-0356 www.ccsd.com mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 TO: Board of Directors Fountain Valley..0 CA A 92728-8127 QLb street address: FROM: Carol Beekman 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA Communications Services Manager 92708-7018 SUBJECT: Documents to Clarify Proposed Rate Increase Member Agencies ffn Cities For your information, we prepared several documents and visuals that might be helpful as you explain the proposed rate increase to your constituents. Anaheim Brea Buena Park 1. AMSA 2002 rate survey and how OCSD rates compare with the average. Cypress 2. Pie chart of proposed expenses for CIP projects. Fountain Valley P P P P J Fullerton 3. Comparison of monthly utility rates, based on sampling from OCSD rate Garden Grove Huntington Beach area. Irvine 4. 1996 comparison to other agencies. La Habra Le Palma 5. Black and Veatch 2002 survey—California Wastewater Charges. Los Alamitos 6. Q & A (also located on our website at www.ocsd.com on the first page). Newport Beach Orange Placentia Santa Ana If you need additional information, please call me at 714/593-7120. Seal Beach C B:I j Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda County of Orange Sanitary Districts Costa Mesa Midway City Water Districts Irvine Ranch To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. SOURCE: The AMSA 2002 Financial Survey, dated February 27, 2003 (Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies) OVERLAY: Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Proposed Single-Family Residential (SFR) User Rates for the Next Five Years AMSA 2002 Survey of 216 Wastewater Treatment Agencies Distribution of Annual Residential Service Charge $600 $500 - $217 at year 2008 $400 — - after projected Annual AMSA 2002 Survey: 5% yearly inflation Residential Average Annual for everybody else ..2 Service Charge of $300 Service Charge 216 Agencies = $244 ���••" N $200 0 - 17 - - N•��' $181 FY 2007-08 151 FY 2006-07 $1 0 0 �`�1 5- 6- FY 2005-06 FY zoo os • OCSD Proposed SFR User Rate $87.50 FY 2003.04 by Fiscal Year FY 002-03 $0 - 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of Service Charges Less Than Value Proposed CIP Budget Breakdown Total = $2 , 373 , 264 , 000 to 2020 Collections Systems Treatment Plants $584,724,000 Rehab / Upgrade$131071595,00025% r GWR System 8 $17912981000 1 I/ -�`�- o Coop. Projects / 3 /o Conservation $79,496,000 18% I .. Expanding Secondary ww Treatment Systems $42211523000 Example Utility Costs Monthly Range (APrilzooa) ♦ Electricity $ 26 to $ 97 ♦ Telephone $ 35 to $ 52 ♦ Natural Gas $ 28 to $ 49 ♦ Water & Trash $ 36 to $ 85 ♦ Wastewater Treatment $ 8 . 75 Comparison to Other Agencies KM GOJ%,� SANI rqT/oy -o h THE Et \C� From- Strategic Plan, RAC Workshop# 3, 12/12/96 Comparison of Residential Sewer Service Rates . . , Sewer Service Rate ($/yr.) Agency 50 100 150 200 250 300 Los Angeles(County) (475 MGD) Oakland(80 MGD) --- �� San Francisco(80 MGD) San Jose(120 MGD) Sacramento(143 MGD) Concord(35 MGD) Los Angeles(City) 0 User Rate (350 MGD) Property Tax OCSD(240 MGD) 1 of 3 Explorer -.;_ p X Ede Edit jam Favorites Iools LI* J 4-Bade -+ Q M 0 1 CASearch MFavorites v Wory C3, r- ® L7 Address http://www.ocsd.com "Go (1 l hks To maintain warld-class leadership in SEARCH ' wastewater and water resource management." �y t2 Homepage Email PO iWeekly Web Pick lNews Proposed Increase to Sewer Service I Charges es The Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors - - will hold a public hearing on Wednesday,June 25,2003 to "Irmation Center consider your input on the proposed rate change. The hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m.in the OCSD Board Room, 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley. I Board of Directors Arch e .. el - ry Latest NewsWed.,May 1 ,2003 5:00 PM-7:00 PM USGS Report Released Finance,Administration and During the summers of 1999 and 2000,beaches at Human Resources Committee. Huntington Beach,California,were repeatedly closed to (FAHR) \ r, swimming because of high bacteria levels in the surf zone. Mon.,May 26,2003 "_+ s Scientists from the U.S.Geological Survey and cooperating i RI Day Event organizations have been investigating whether ocean currents and waves transport the wastewater from the Memorial Day tt..A Orange County Sanitation District outfal to the beaches, 4, 1 These studies Indicate that bacteria from the outfal are not a significant source of the beach contamination. 1 I - alb ,: 'n�• -To maintain world-clus;leudcrshrp in • wastewater and water resource management" Simi _ !A '_1j Homepage >News Articles>Display Article Email page!::J Print friendy format ., . 1 Proposed Increase to Ser:rer Service Charges The Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors will hold a pubic a�t 1 I%l• ervices hearing on Wednesday,June 25,2003 to consider your input on the ,- proposed rate change. The hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m.in the OCq Board POOrn,10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley. iNBC IV- ��• n� " — OCSD is art of a large regional sewerage system serving23 cities and T ea YGgr I unincorporated areas within Orange County. Your wastewater is collected clrcc►f wrYt<:; P g y. _ fist by your local sewering agency,such as your city,and then transported by OCSD's large trunk sewers to one of two regional 1-4ontcct Ustreatment plants. Our facilities treat and dispose of nearly 234 million gallons of wastewater each day. Due to substantial economies of scale and efficient operation of the sewerage system,the sewer service charges of OCSD continue to be among the lowest of all California and U.S.sewerage agencies. During the past year the OCSD Board of Directors voted to provide disinfection and secondary treatment to all of the wastewater discharged to the ocean. This has increased annual operating expenses nearly$7 million and has increased the 10 year capital y improvement program to$2.1 billion. A sewer service rate increase is required to pay for these changes. The sewer service charges of OCSD continue to be among the lowest of all California and U.S.sewerage agencies. (Sewer Service Fee Questions and An,r,- ) Contact Address: !QPQ 10044 E&Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Privacy Statement i Disclaimer (714)%2-2411 Contact webmaster Copyright©2001-2002 Orange County Sanitation District 2of3 1 - / `. r / ' / r r / / "To maintain world class leadership in YSEAIbCH wastewater and water resource management" Homepage >Frequently Asked Queshom>Artiwers Email page-. Prrt frtendy lormet v •• Sewer Service Fees News Services Information Center What Is the sewer service fee? How is the sewer service fee calculated? Who amoroved the sewer service fee? How lonq will the sewer service fee acicear on the tax bill? Directors'Board of is the sewer service fee coin to increase? was the sewer service fee voter aooroved? How do you satisfy the recnvrements of PrgMitions 13 and 218? Am 1 aavrfg for the same thing on my utility bill? Can I aet the sewer service fees lowered? What if I am not connected to the sewer? Vdhv are we or000sno a 5-year increase schedule? what if 1 have further ouesWns or comments about the sewer service fee? What is the sewer service fee? y; The sewer service flee is for the collection,treatment,and disposal of wastewater(sewage). It Is a fee,not a tax because it Is not based on the value of the property. How Is the sewer service fee calculated? It is based upon the type of property. Residential properties, including condominiums and town homes,are charged a flat rate. Multi-family(apartment buildings including duplexes and triplexes) and mobile home parks are charged on a per unit basis. Non- residential properties are charged a rate per thousand square feet of Improvements. The rate varies based upon the use of the property. Who approved the sewer service fee? The fee was passed by ordinance by the OCSD Board of Directors. The Board consists of elected officials-either mayors or council members from each city,or representatives from the local sanitary or water district and a member from the Orange County Board of Supervisors. How long will the sewer service fee appear on the tax bill? At this point it appears m be hdefnite. Using the property tax bill Is the most cost effective method of collection. Is the sewer service fee going to Increase? The uniform single-family,residential(SFR)user rate will increase over the next fire year period from the 2002-2003 rate of$87.50 to; 2003-2004 rate$105 20D4-20(Y5 rate$126 2005-2006 rate$151 2006-2007 rate$181 2007-2008 rate$217 The multi-family residential"R)use per apartment unit has been established by flow monitoring and census data to be 70%of the SFR use. Thus,the NFR rate will Increase proportionally per unit per year. Non-residential users pay a rate per 1,000 square feet of building area,based upon the average quantity and strength of wastewater discharged as determined by studies of actual tows discharged into the system by each particular category of users. The fee is reviewed each year to make sure it meets maintenance and operations costs of OCSD. It can be expected to increase as costs Increase and new programs are adopted by OCSD. Although this may seem like a lot,the sewer service charges of OCSD continue to be among the lowest of all California and U.S. sewerage agencies. 3 of 3 Was the sewer service fee voter approved? No public vote Is required. When a fee is Imposed or Increased,a Public Notice is published in 8he local newspaper and notifications are mailed to property owners. The fees are enacted after a public hearing by a vote of the Board of Directors. How do you satisfy the requirements of Propositions 13 and 2187 Proposition 13 deals with taxes. The user fee is based upon the average use of the sewer system,not property values. Therefore the user fee Is not a tax and Is not governed by Proposition 13. Proposition 218 has a specific exemption for sewer user fees. OCSD mails a notice to each property owner and conducts a public hearing. An election Is not required. Am I paying for the same thing on my utility bill? Some of the cities charge a maintenance fee for their local sewer Ines. Often tunes,this fee is on the water bill. The sewage from those local Ines flows into OCSD's large regional truck sewers and comes to one of our two plants for treatment. Can I get the sewer service fees lowered? Non-residential users with a low water use may be eligible for a reduction based on actual water use.They must send OCSD a written request(from the property owner)a"with a copy of their water bills for the prior fiscal year(12 complete months)and a copy of the current tax bill. What if I am not connected to the sewer? Parcels not corrected to the sewer are exempt from sewer service fees. There are no other exemptions. The owner may write to OCSD indicating they use a septic tank or that the property is not developed along with thelr parcel number and the owner's signature. Why are we proposing a 5-year Increase schedule? Tl+o.m�WIN ryf 14V rnefG kr IF+o ronlf�l Imnrnvemanh iron irerl M The majority of the costs for the capital improvements required to Implement full secondary treatment are expected to be incurred over the next 5 yeas although completion will take approximately 10 yeas. Adopting a multiyear schedule will allow us to borrow funds at lower rates because it shows a viable cash flow. This reduces costs over the long run. A multi-year program also saves administrative costs for publishing and mailing notices and holding meetings. What if I have further questions or comments about the sewer service feel The Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors will hold a public hearing on Wednesday,June 25,20M to consider your input on the proposed rate change. The hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the OCSD Board Room.10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley, California. Written comments may also be submitted trough the mail to the Sanitation District at P.O.Box 8127,Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127. We have also established an email account should you prefer to leave an electronic message. Our address is ratas(0ocsd.com If you have additional questions or want more information,please call(714)593-7281. Our office hours are 8:00 a.m.to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If these times are not convenient,you may leave a recorded message after hours or on weekends or email. A member of the Sanitation District's staff will return your call. St KAY ALL CAI CGOR0.5 BACK Contact Address: 191LQ 10844 ERis Averwe,Fount:an Valley,CA 92708 privacy Statement I Disclaimer (714)962-2411 Contact webmaster Copyright 0 M-2002 Orange County Santation District Orange County Sanitation District 4�vNtV S A JJ J T,,I��y 2 — . y9 May 28,2003 fit r- 7 Q.M" poeni"' -...— ..._ V. If It Were Just a Matter of Price, We Look Very Good AMSA 2002 Nationwide Survey of 216 Wastewater Treatment Agencies Annual Residential Service Charge $600 s5o0 �$217 at year 2008 with projected OCSD Proposed 1 $400 5%yearlylnflatloUserRateIncrease for everybody els to$217 OCSD Currant User Rate$87.50 8% 4% 20117 st00 0 00 2 s0 0% 10% 20% 00% 40% 50% 60% 70% e0% 90% 100% Percent of Service Charges I.—Than Value 1 How We Keep Costs Down ♦ Good planning ♦ Delivering projects on-time/under budget ♦ Being financially strong ♦ Consistent compliance ♦ Managing assets ♦ Ocean waiver through June 2003 On-Going Planning 1977 Master Plan 1989 "2020 Vision"Action Plan 1999 Strategic Plan 2002 Strategic Plan Update A Healthy Ocean 2 Clean Beaches LL� a. t Environmental Stewardship Beneficial Reuse Groundwater Replenishment System. F �t Biosolids grovm cnttnn hem 3 Sustainable Infrastructure Innovative Technology I Intergenerational Equity The principle that this generation will convey to the next generation adequate public infrastructure and that the cost will be fairly shared between the generations 4 Intergenerational Equity � t T Orange County Sanitation District Fees & Charges o � May 28,2003 5 Types of Charges • Sanitary Sewer Service $77.8 M • Capital Facilities Capacity $ 8.0 M • Supplemental Capital Facilities $ 0.6 M • Source Control Permit Users $ 6.0 M • Special Purpose Discharge Permit $ 0.3 M • Miscellaneous Charges 8,Fees $ 0.5 M OCSD Funding Requirements Debtservice •CIP Outlay •OW Expense S 600 M Pr*cl.d $500 m ........................... ......................................... .. $400 M ................ -0"- .......... S 300 M ..................... .. .. .. ... .. ............ A�.-I—j Proposed ESVd $200 M .......I.... f== loom .. .. .. $ 2001 IM IM .14 1111 1111 1011 111* 1000 MG I'll I'll N" Fiscat Year Sources of Revenues User Fees •Interest •Taxes $600 m $500 m . ....................................... .......... ...................... $400 M ...........................7 Projected $300 M . . .... .................. ............. ...... Proposed S 200 M . Actual..EsVd s 100 m . ... .. $m long NNIMMMM Win—W 2001 2002 2003 20N 2005 2005 2007 20*a 2009 2010 201 2012 2013 Fiscal Year Average Annual Sewer Service Charge Rate $750 ProJacLd $250 .............................P .roposed :.. ..\..�.\.. . RX $200 ............................................ ¢yy ... .. $100 Act ..... $50 -ISPU Projections @ SO:50 S 2001 '002 20M 2004 2005 2006 2007 2006 2009 7010 2011 2012 2010 Fiscal Year Proposed Annual Rates ♦ Single Family Residence $ 105.00 ♦ Multi Family Residence $ 73.50 Non Residential (7%to 7969,o) ♦ Warehouse $ 425 ♦ Office Complex $6,200 ♦ Car Wash $2,300 Example Utility Costs Monthly Range ♦ Electricity $26 to $97 ♦ Telephone $35 to $52 ♦ Natural Gas $28 to $49 ♦ Water&Trash $36 to $85 ♦ Wastewater Treatment $8.75 Permit User Rates ♦ Flow— $316.38 per mg ♦ BOD— $233.00 per t000lbs ♦ SS— $230.14 per 1,000 ibs Large Permit User Examples 2002-03 2003-04 High Flow $372,000 $448,000 High BOD $392,000 $481,000 High SS $ 68,000 $ 84,000 Planning Parameters lsas tsss 2003 Master Plan strat Plan Val CIP Planning Horizon 30 yrs 20 yrs 19 yrs CIP Budget $1.4B Billion $1.51 Billion $2.38 Billion Projected Flow 399 mgd 352 mgd 321 mgd Flow per Household(EDU) 399 gpd 260 gpd 260 gpd Number of EDUs 1,0D0,000 1,354,OD0 1.235.000 i Flow per 1,000 sq ft for 80 gpd 150 gpd 150 gpd Commercial User Commercial:SFR Ratio 20% 5B% 58% 9 Capital Investment Equalization Method (s Millions) 1999 2007 2007 N. Strat Plan J VaICIPI Alternate 1 Uaen Existing Net Assets $ 763 $ 1,074 $ 1,074 Additional Capacity 805 622 622 $ 622 Improved Treatment 48 642 642 Replace,Rehab,Refurb 665 1,011 Support 14 96 96 $ 2,295 Is 3,4451 $ 2,434 $ 622 EDUs in 2020 1.354,000 11.235,000 1.235,000 , 311.00 � $ $00lnvest.nt per EDU 1695 l Capital Facilities Capacity Charge ♦ Single Family Residence $ 1,740 to $3,890 ♦ Multi Family Residence $ 890 to $3,020 Non Residential ($per 1,000 sq ft) ♦ Low Demand $ 170 ♦ Average Demand $1,040 ♦ High Demand $2,470 Supplemental CFCC ♦ Baseline ♦ Significant industrial/commercial user ♦ Flow, BOD, SS ♦ Cost of funds ♦ 20-year life 10 Miscellaneous Fees & Charges ♦ Administrative fees ♦ Wastehauler fees ♦ Sampling fees Action Recommend approval of Ordinance OCSD-_adopting various service fees and charges 11 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority" J ty EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT SAWrA INLAND EMPIRE UTIIMES ApENcY QRANG9 COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAN DERNARDINO VAU.EY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN MUNICIPAL.WATER DISTRICT May 20, 2003 GENERAL MANAGER P.40SI_PN GRINDSTAFF Shirley McCracken, Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-2018 Subject: ,]MC Medigtipn Recommendation Dear Ms.McCracken: This is iti response to your .April 25, 2003 letter, On behalf of the Commission of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority("SAWPA"), we are pleased to adviRe you that at its regular meeting of May 20, 2003, the Commission approved the recommendation of the Joint Management Committee ("MC") to enlist the assistance of a neutral, independent mediator (i.e„ settlement facilitator) to help negotiate and settle the outstanding issues between SAWPA and OCSD regarding the subject SARI Line protection/relocation project. The SAWPA Commission agrees with the OCSD Board of Directors that it is imperative to end this dispute quickly. The SAWPA Commission has given the resolution of those issues the highest priority, and is committed to resolving the issues between our two agencies as soon as possible. In that connection, we are sorry that the Joint Management Committee is unable to meet today, but we certainly understand the circumstances that have led to its cancellation. We Iook forward to the June 17, 2003, Joint Management Corninittee rneeting, Sincerely, S.It. Al Chairman Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority C: Board of Directors—OCSD Board of Directors—EMWD Board Qf Directors—WMWI) Board of Directors—OCWD Board of Directors--IBUA 11015 Sterling Avenµe,Rivepide,CA 92503•4979•(9p9)55g-QZo Administration FAX(909)785.7076 0 Planning SAX(909)352-8422 Pr r m .-U.tuna c ion i anwrr-i Shirley McCracken, Chair and OCSD Board of Direcors AAA 20,2003 i Page 2 of 2 I Beard of Diromors—S13 VNIWD U.S,EPA—CWA Compliance Office(W'I' 'R-&),Tom Huetteman SWRCI3--Office of the Chief Counsel,J.Leon RWQCB—Gerard J.Thibeault RWQCB —Gary Stewart RWQCB—X.Bechtel SWRCB—Division of'Water Quality,Jim Maughan Orange County Coastkeeper City of Vorb4 Linda,rim Winder .California Aep4=ent of Fish and Game U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Rene Vermeeren Orange County Health Care Agency Orange County Public Facilities Resources Department,herb Nakasone Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority i COMMISSION FOR THE PROJECT AUTHORITY EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 7SAWPA ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT May 13, 2003 GENERAL MANAGER Ms. Shirley McCracken, Chair P.JOSEPH GRINDSTAFF and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-2018 Subject: Joint Management Committee Mediation Recommendation Dear Ms. McCracken: In response to OCSD's April 25, 2003 letter, the SAWPA Commission met and conferred today on the Joint Management Committee's (JMC) recommendation to enlist the assistance of a neutral, independent mediator (i.e. settlement facilitator) to help settle the outstanding issues between SAWPA and OCSD regarding the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor Protection/Relocation project. The SAWPA Commission is inclined to support the JMC's recommendation and has directed staff to prepare a written response. This response will be reviewed and approved by the Commission at its next meeting on May 20, 2003. SAWPA's written response will include provisions for mediation to be discussed at the May 20, 2003 Commission meeting. Sincerely, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority S. Chairman SRL:PJG:pb C: Board of Directors—OCSD Board of Directors—EMWD Board of Directors—VVMWD Board of Directors—OCWD Board of Directors—IEUA Board of Directors—SB VMWD 11615 Sterling Avenue,Riverside,CA 92503-4979 • (909)354-4220 Administration FAX(909)755-7076 9 Planning FAX(909)352-3422 e t 6�J�ty SAHITTTo� c 9 a 0 �cTN�HE Orange County • Permit Renewal Status of OCSD Ocean Discharge Permit: • Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is required to maintain a valid ocean discharge permit from the EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in order to discharge treated wastewater into the Pacific Ocean. • Current five-year permit expires June 8, 2003. • OCSD submitted application to EPA and RWQCB for renewal in December 2002. • The current permit remains valid and enforceable until EPA/Regional Water Quality Control Board issues a new permit. Next Steps: • Regulators will develop a new permit and an interim compliance agreement for operation of the treatment plants until the Orange County Sanitation District completes construction of full secondary treatment facilities. • EPA/Regional Water Quality Control Board will hold public workshops and hearings when a draft permit is developed. • OCSD does not have an estimated time frame for permit renewal. The EPA/Regional Water Quality Control Board controls the time schedule. OCSD Commitment: • The construction process of new secondary treatment facilities has begun. Planning and design is already under way. • OCSD staff will provide regular updates to the OCSD Board of Directors and members of the public about project milestones reached, the schedule, and the renewal process. Contact Information: For more information or questions, please contact: Jim Colston, Regulatory Specialist, 714-593-7458 or icolston(CD-ocsd.com or Sonja Wassgren, Principal Public Information Specialist, 714-593-7122 or swassg renCaD-ocsd.com SAMPLE L TTER OF SUPPORT FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS IN O.C. CITIES FOR FEDERAL FUNDS Dear Representative On behalf of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), (the City of ) writes to request your continued active support and leadership to improve the quality of our County's coastal waters. Specifically, the Orange County Sanitation District is requesting $3 million in federal assistance in Fiscal Year 2004 to construct mandated treatment facilities to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act. This request is being sought as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's State and Tribal Assistance Grants Account. It is also my understanding that your staff has been fully briefed and that you support OCSD in its effort to receive similar assistance as other wastewater treatment systems have in the past. We urge you to communicate the importance of this priority to your colleagues on the spending committee. In July 2002, OCSD's Board of Directors, after reviewing extensive data related to the health of our water environment and the desires of our customers, voted to voluntarily move to full secondary treatment. We join OCSD in its belief that it must employ the most environmentally protective treatment possible to assure the protection of our local ocean waters and address the increasing growth in our service area. The decision to meet this increased level of treatment requires the commitment of OCSD, our state and federal legislators and the ratepayers. OCSD will need to commit over $400 million over the next ten years to increase treatment levels. This will result in substantial rate increases for Orange County ratepayers. It is imperative that federal assistance is granted to OCSD as it was to other large urban coastal communities including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Boston. These communities, like OCSD, were faced with identical infrastructure improvement needs and received substantial federal support to meet their federal environmental mandates. Furthermore, OCSD is working jointly with the Orange County Water District to design and construct a state-of-the art ground water replenishment system to help meet the water supply needs of the region. It is the largest project of its kind in the United States. GWR will provide a solution for Orange County's future water needs and decrease our reliance on imported water. In order to support future phases of GWR, OCSD must produce larger quantities of secondarily treated wastewater to provide water for the growing community and augment the dwindling supply of excess water from the Colorado River. OCSD's decision to upgrade its level of treatment is necessary to allow for future phases of this project. (City of greatly appreciates your support of OCSD and its mission. We look forward to working with you and or staff in the years ahead to protect the coastal waters of our beautiful coastline and to provide a pure solution to Orange County's water needs. Sincerely, . ^ Penny Kyle U nonm»nmouiate Action Board Secretary O High Priority Action Phone: 714'583'7130 O Routine Priority Action Fax: 714'962'0350 U Information Only Emoi|: pky|o@ooad.00m O To O Other - / ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. Box O127-1O844 Ellis Avenue A no-win proposition for Orange County Page 1 of 4 Sunday,May 18,2003 A no-win proposition for Orange County Decades after Prop. 13, politicians are seeking parity for their local governments with little success. By MARTIN WISCKOL The Orange County Register The words spill out like honey as Joel Fox explains the grand success of Proposition 13, the landmark 1978 initiative that dramatically reduced and capped then-spiraling property taxes. But the enthusiasm drains from his voice as the conversation turns to how those cuts are distributed. Under the system, Orange County's local governments and special districts share 37 percent of property taxes collected within its borders, while San Francisco's get 67 percent and Los Angeles' get 60 percent. "The distribution system needs some work," said Fox, an aide to Prop. 13 author Howard Jarvis and later president of the Jarvis Taxpayers Association. "It was just the quickest, smoothest way to get something in place at the time." June 6 marks the 25th anniversary of voters' overwhelming approval of Prop. 13. For the past 10 years, there has been a growing clamor to change how the property taxes are divvied up, with proposals for reform being presented —and rejected —at an ever-faster clip. "Everybody knows (the distribution system) is obsolete," said Chris McKenzie, executive director of the California League of Cities. "The devil is in the details." Not surprisingly, a good share of proposed reforms carry the fingerprints of Orange County officials. The inequity means less money for services here—services like recreation, child care and health care. Orange County spends $57 per capita annually on health care, compared with the average of$192 per capita for the state's 26 counties —generally the largest ones — that run their own programs for the medically indigent. "In other counties, you don't have to be sick to get help," said Nancy Rimsha, a legal-aid attorney who represents the county's medically indigent. "If we had more money in the system, we could provide preventative and diagnostic health care, rather than being an emergency-room reimbursement program." If you can't afford health care, the county will pull your decayed tooth — but not fill it. In many cases, it will fix one eye with cataracts, but not both. It can take two months to apply and be approved for treatment. Take the case of Joe Tessitore, a Fullerton window installer with no health insurance. Constant headaches and shooting pains from his neck into his skull — possibly the delayed effect of a car accident— became so bad that by the beginning http:Hwww2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=39720§ion=NEWS&year=... 5/23/2003 A no-win proposition for Orange County Page 2 of 4 of this month he could no longer work. An emergency-room visit to St. Jude Medical Center on May 3 got him some painkillers — and a May 19 appointment to apply for county-funded medical care. A definitive diagnosis and treatment still could be a month away while the county processes the application. "There's not much I can do but lay on the couch, waiting," said Tessitore, 38. "I've called everywhere I can think of(for help). It's frustrating." 'The long knives' While Howard Jarvis knew how he wanted property taxes cut—slashed to 1 percent of assessed value— Prop. 13 did not address distribution of the smaller pool of revenue to the governments that use it. So legislative consultants drew up a number of plans, including one in which each city and county government would get an equal percentage. But because some cities and counties had much higher property-tax rates than others before Prop. 13, the plan would hit some hard while leaving low-taxing governments relatively unscathed. It was a tense time. "We referred to it as the night of the long knives," said Fred Silva, then a Senate consultant working on the plan, Assembly Bill 8. "Cities were coming up and saying this plan or that plan would destroy them." The Legislature agreed on a formula in which the percentage of property taxes was tied to the level of property taxes levied before Prop. 13. San Francisco had high taxes, so it got a bigger percentage. Dana Point and Irvine had low taxes, so they got smaller percentages. Percentages varied, but the degree of pain was, at least in theory, equal. The property-tax revenue that remained —after shelling out shares to local government and special districts—was given to schools. Because the state guarantees a minimum funding to schools on a per-student basis, the state made up the difference — and ended up channeling a lot more education money to cities like San Francisco than it did to those in Orange County. "Has it turned out to be unfair to Orange County? Absolutely," said David Doerr, another AB8 consultant. "But it was the only practical way to do it." By the 1990s, proposals for reform were popping up more frequently. In 1996, both the Constitutional Revision Commission and the Legislative Analyst's Office came to the same conclusion for reform: Let local governments decide how split up the money raised in their jurisdiction once the state has extracted a share for schools. The problem was not only opposition from high-percentage cities like San Francisco http://www2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/ocr/printA.rticle.do?id=39720§ion=NEWS&year-... 5/23/2003 ;A no-win proposition for Orange County Page 3 of 4 but also the likelihood of local governments fighting among themselves as they tried to figure out how to share the taxes. Anaheim Mayor Curt Pringle, an assemblyman in the 1990s, said these conflicts have prevented the sweeping reform that's needed. "It's a dysfunctional taxing system, but very few people are looking at a global reform," he said. "They're looking at parochial protection." Housing crisis Orange County Supervisor Chris Norby is one of those looking at large-scale reform —a redistribution of property taxes that would give all cities 60 percent of what they generate and that would encourage building homes instead of stores. But even Norby still is tinkering to find a formula that would win enough support for approval. More common are piecemeal proposals like Assembly Bill 1568 by Assemblyman Lou Correa, D-Anaheim, which would increase the property-tax percentage for counties receiving the least. But this is a tough sell in deficit-ridden Sacramento, which would have to make up the difference. Slightly better odds for passage are given to Assembly Bill 1221 by Assemblymen Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, and John Campbell, R-Newport Beach. Like Norby, the assemblymen are concerned with the existing incentives to build stores rather than homes. Because of the low amount of property taxes generated by homes — particularly condominiums and apartments—cities rarely receive enough to cover the cost of services. But retail uses — particularly the big-box stores and auto malls —generate sales taxes that go directly to the cities, paying several times over for local government costs associated with the businesses. "Young families just starting out can't find apartments to live in," Campbell said. "But cities go backward economically to provide them." AB1221 would redirect half of the cities' sales taxes to the state then give the cities an equal amount back by increasing their share of property taxes. This diminishes the incentives to build stores and provides a less-volatile revenue source. But AB1221 does not deal with the fundamental distribution inequity—and still is running into opposition, including that from cities committed to attracting as much retail as possible. It has yet to go before the full Assembly. When it comes to achieving a fully equitable solution, Sacramento veterans say somebody would have to lose money, making that prospect unlikely to ever win approval. "Aside from little incremental steps, it's going to take some kind of guided missile to blow up (if there is to be substantial change)," said Silva, who now works for the Public Policy Institute. "Something like a Supreme Court ruling deciding what the http://www2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=39720§ion=NEWS&year--... 5/23/2003 A no-win proposition for Orange County Page 4 of_4 system should be, although previous lawsuits have failed. "With the current system, we're like a dysfunctional family, and we just can't get it together." CONTACT US: (714) 285-2867 or mwisckol@ocregister.com Change County: A property-tax loser This tlidil.,for (lie 12 must San Francisco&i__ 671% populous countles,shows Los Angeles j� 59.7% the percentage of the property tax collected Alameda i�m_ 553% within its borders that ,San Bernardino _'..,-_,_ _ 53.9% each county receives for its combined county and i Riverside r city governments and its contra costa i_ �5os�ti special districts.Orange Sacramento: :350.3% County ranks 40th among all 58 counties.These Ventura��___ _ _ "18.0% calculations do not include Ore 40.3% school districts which receive an equal amount Fresno ._ 39.S0w per student from a San Woo 1111L� 38.1% combination of property taxes and state funds. Santa Clara 37J% Sourip:C3litomia Board 01 Note:Does not include property-tax increment revenue Equ3liaation.fiscal yUar20M.1 from redevelopment districts. The Register http://www2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=39720§ion=NEWS&year=... 5/23/2003 \ li MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, May 14, 2003, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on May 14, 2003, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Brian Brady, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer Roy Moore, Vice Chair Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Alberta Christy Carol Beekman, Communications Services Mike Duvall Manager Mark Leyes David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Joy Neugebauer Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Maintenance Steve Anderson, Vice Board Chair Mike White, Controller Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager Directors Absent: Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst James W. Silva James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Sonya Wassgren 7-iomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Jennifer Cabral Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel Don Hughes Randy Fuhrman Ryal Wheeler Garry Brown (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman requested he be allowed to speak prior to the consideration of Item 11(b). (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Brady stated that Closed Session, Item 13(a)(1), would be considered immediately following the consent calendar. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 May 14, 2003 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported the District hosted the Orange County Business Council's Board meeting the prior week. The Business Council had voted unanimously to endorse ACA 10, a bill that would give the District the discretion to raise fees related to urban runoff management. Favorable discussion has been held throughout the state on this issue. The following week Mr. Anderson would be attending the AMSA Conference, which will be held in Washington, DC. He is scheduled to meet with Senator Cox and Senator Sanchez, who have both been very helpful on the EPA grant the District is seeking to help fund secondary treatment facilities. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCEITREASURER Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer, referred the Directors to the Treasurer's Report distributed to the Directors that evening and provided an explanation for a couple of minor exceptions to the policy. He also referred the Directors to a revised exhibit distributed that evening to Agenda Item 11(b) - FAHR03-38 regarding fees paid by permit users which sorted the users by order of highest paid to lowest paid users. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, reported that Item 12(a)— FAHR03-39 was not included in the committee package. She requested the information be moved for consideration at the June 11, 2003 FAHR Committee meeting. (8) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES MANAGER Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager, distributed to the Directors information contained on the District's website regarding the sewer rate increase the Directors might find helpful to share with their constituents. She also distributed a chart from an AMSA national survey conducted in 2002 that rated 216 agencies across the country. The chart reflects where OCSD's proposed rates compare with other agencies. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, reported an e-mail had been received from SAWPA regarding the Board's action in April concerning utilization of a mediator over the dispute of monies owed to the District. SAWPA indicated that a special meeting had been held and they directed staff to prepare the response to review and approve at their next commission meeting, which would be held on May 21s". SAWPA would provide the District a letter immediately following this meeting informing the District of their action. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 May 14, 2003 (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The Chair ordered that the April 9, 2003 minutes for the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved, as mailed. b. FAHR03-28 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2003. C. FAHR03-29 Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. d. FAHR03-30 Receive and file Employment Status Report as of April 30, 2003. e. FAHR03-31 Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. f. FAHR03-32 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file the 2002-03 Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ending March 31, 2003. g. FAHR03-33 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2003 through March 31, 2003. h. FAHR03-34 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03- _, approving Orange County Sanitation District Amended Deferred Compensation Plan (2003)for Officers and Employees of the District. i. FAHR03-35 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve an increase of$1.00 per hour to the Intern pay range grade 0 ($10.00 -$17.00), in support of the new Student Intern Program, to be effective May 28, 2003. j. FAHR03-36 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No.29546 issued to Health Science and Associates for completion of a Comprehensive Asbestos Survey, providing for additional sampling to comply with Environmental Protection Agency and Cal-OSHA regulations for an additional amount of$51,993.65, for a total amount not to exceed$113,163.00. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a) through 0) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 5:20 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item No. 13(a)(1). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 May 14, 2003 by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There were no reportable actions taken by the Committee re Agenda Item No. 13(a)(1). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 5:45 p.m.,the Committee reconvened in regular session. (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR03-37 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03- _, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for classification structure adjustments as follows: a) Create the CIP Project Manager classification at pay range 88 ($6,578 -$8,222) and a Senior CIP Project Manager at pay grade 92 ($7,260 - $9,075) b) Create the Accounting Supervisor classification at pay grade 86 ($6,260 - $7,825) c) Move the Materials Control Supervisor classification from pay grade 81 ($5,534-$6,917) to pay grade 83 ($5,814 -$7,267). Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst, gave a brief report outlining the need for adjustments to the classification structure, which creates two new classifications and the adjustment of a pay grade for the Materials Control Supervisor classification. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. FAHR03-38 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-20, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-18 and Ordinance No. OCSD-19. Blake Anderson provided a brief overview of fee and budget issues for FY 2003-04, which impact the user rates. Major changes influencing the proposed budget are: decision to upgrade treatment to full secondary standards; disinfection of the effluent; approval of the amended Capital Improvement Program; approval of GWR System agreement; and Kern County ban on Class B biosolids. Also of significant note is an increase of $6.38 million for employees' salaries and benefits, the addition of 32 full-time employees, and costs of contracts currently being negotiated with employee bargaining units. Mr. Anderson noted that the District's rates, '• Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 May 14, 2003 when compared to the costs of 216 agencies surveyed across the nation, are well below the 10t' percentile. Facing a 20% increase per year for the next five years,from$87.50 to$217, the District is still in a very low percentile for sewer user rates when compared nationwide. Randy Fuhrman was then recognized and requested the Directors to borrow less which saves ratepayers in the long term. He stated that it was his hope that each Director had a goal of maintaining reserves at the same level when they began their representation on the District's board. Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reviewed the ordinance process. The first reading will be held at the May 28t' Board meeting, and the public hearing, second reading and adoption will take place at the June 25th Board meeting. Rates must be supplied to the County in July in order to include them on the property tax bills for the following year. Notices were mailed to property owners providing the required 45-day advance notice prior to the hearing. Approximately 284 telephone calls, 88 voice mail messages, and 163 e-mail messages have been received to date from the public regarding the rate increase. Mr. Streed then reviewed the types of charges contained in the ordinance,funding requirements, sources of revenues and cash flow summary. Directors entered into discussion and expressed concern over the rate of increase for the capital facilities capacity charges. Discussion took place to consider phasing in these increases, removing these charges from the ordinance and re-examining establishing incentives to move those property owners on septic tanks to sewers. General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff responded to Directors questions concerning rate increases and compliance with Proposition 218, explaining the different criteria used to establish user fees and connection fees. A substitute motion was made and seconded to reduce the increase in sewer service user fees from 20%to 15% per year for five years, and to defer the consideration of capital connection fees until further information is provided by staff. The motion failed by a vote of three ayes and five nays. A motion was made and seconded to recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-20, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-18 and Ordinance No. OCSD-19; and direct staff and General Counsel to provide additional information regarding capital connection fees. The motion failed by a vote of three ayes and five nays. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 6 May 14, 2003 oops Directors continued discussion regarding connection charges, the basis from which the charges are established, and the equitableness of fair share for all who connect to the sewer system. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried that the FAHR Committee move proposed Ordinance No. 20 forward to the Board of Directors as presently written, with no recommendation of approval by the FAHR Committee, and request that the legal and technical items of information that have been requested by various Directors be provided prior to the first reading of said proposed ordinance at the May 28, 2003 Board meeting. (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR03-39 Temporary Services Cost Comparison Report Due to a photocopying error, it was requested this item be placed on the agenda for consideration at the June 11, 2003 FAHR meeting. b. FAHR03-40 2003/04 Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget Updates Mike White, Controller, reviewed the budget proposal for fiscal year 2003/04. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for June 11, 2003 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m. Submitted by: 1.,a2 Penny M.We FAHR Committee S ietary GAwp.dta\admin\BS\FAHR\051403 draft FAHR Minutes.doc i e 1 ®_ 4�JNty SNf TTOM Q 9 Q n 0 vwv CrJ 9o�`CTHC'J E E V,PDi� Orange County • Renewal Status of OCSD Ocean Discharge Permit: • Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is required to maintain a valid ocean discharge permit from the EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in order to discharge treated wastewater into the Pacific Ocean. • Current five-year permit expires June 8, 2003. • OCSD submitted application to EPA and RWQCB for renewal in December 2002. • The current permit remains valid and enforceable until EPA/Regional Water Quality Control Board issues a new permit. Next Steps: • Regulators will develop a new permit and an interim compliance agreement for operation of the treatment plants until the Orange County Sanitation District completes construction of full secondary treatment facilities. • EPA/Regional Water Quality Control Board will hold public workshops and hearings when a draft permit is developed. • OCSD does not have an estimated time frame for permit renewal. The EPA/Regional Water Quality Control Board controls the time schedule. OCSD Commitment: • The construction process of new secondary treatment facilities has begun. Planning and design is already under way. • OCSD staff will provide regular updates to the OCSD Board of Directors and members of the public about project milestones reached, the schedule, and the renewal process. Contact Information: For more information or questions, please contact: Jim Colston, Regulatory Specialist, 714-593-7458 or icolston(a)-ocsd.com or Sonja Wassgren, Principal Public Information Specialist, 714-593-7122 or swassg ren(aD-ocsd.com n SAMPLE LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS IN O.C. CITIES FOR FEDERAL FUNDS Dear Representative On behalf of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), (the City of ) writes to request your continued active support and leadership to improve the quality of our County's coastal waters. Specifically, the Orange County Sanitation District is requesting $3 million in federal assistance in Fiscal Year 2004 to construct mandated treatment facilities to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act. This request is being sought as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's State and Tribal Assistance Grants Account. It is also my understanding that your staff has been fully briefed and that you support OCSD in its effort to receive similar assistance as other wastewater treatment systems have in the past. We urge you to communicate the importance of this priority to your colleagues on the spending committee. In July 2002, OCSD's Board of Directors, after reviewing extensive data related to the health of our water environment and the desires of our customers, voted to voluntarily move to full secondary treatment. We join OCSD in its belief that it must employ the most environmentally protective treatment possible to assure the protection of our local ocean waters and address the increasing growth in our service area. The decision to meet this increased level of treatment requires the commitment of OCSD, our state and federal legislators and the ratepayers. OCSD will need to commit over $400 million over the next ten years to increase treatment levels. This will result in substantial rate increases for Orange County ratepayers. It is imperative that federal assistance is granted to OCSD as it was to other large urban coastal communities including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Boston. These communities, like OCSD, were faced with identical infrastructure improvement needs and received substantial federal support to meet their federal environmental mandates. Furthermore, OCSD is working jointly with the Orange County Water District to design and construct a state-of-the art ground water replenishment system to help meet the water supply needs of the region. It is the largest project of its kind in the United States. GWR will provide a solution for Orange County's future water needs and decrease our reliance on imported water. In order to support future phases of GWR, OCSD must produce larger quantities of secondarily treated wastewater to provide water for the growing community and augment the dwindling supply of excess water from the Colorado River. OCSD's decision to upgrade its level of treatment is necessary to allow for future phases of this project. (City of greatly appreciates your support of OCSD and its mission. We look forward to working with you and or staff in the years ahead to protect the coastal waters of our beautiful coastline and to provide a pure solution to Orange County's water needs. Sincerely, A no-win proposition for Orange County Page 2 of 4 of this month he could no longer work. An emergency-room visit to St. Jude Medical Center on May 3 got him some painkillers — and a May 19 appointment to apply for county-funded medical care. A definitive diagnosis and treatment still could be a month away while the county processes the application. "There's not much I can do but lay on the couch, waiting," said Tessitore, 38. "I've called everywhere I can think of(for help). It's frustrating." 'The long knives' While Howard Jarvis knew how he wanted property taxes cut—slashed to 1 percent of assessed value — Prop. 13 did not address distribution of the smaller pool of revenue to the governments that use it. So legislative consultants drew up a number of plans, including one in which each city and county government would get an equal percentage. But because some cities and counties had much higher property-tax rates than others before Prop. 13, the plan would hit some hard while leaving low-taxing governments relatively unscathed. It was a tense time. "We referred to it as the night of the long knives," said Fred Silva, then a Senate consultant working on the plan, Assembly Bill 8. "Cities were coming up and saying this plan or that plan would destroy them." The Legislature agreed on a formula in which the percentage of property taxes was tied to the level of property taxes levied before Prop. 13. San Francisco had high taxes, so it got a bigger percentage. Dana Point and Irvine had low taxes, so they got smaller percentages. Percentages varied, but the degree of pain was, at least in theory, equal. The property-tax revenue that remained —after shelling out shares to local government and special districts —was given to schools. Because the state guarantees a minimum funding to schools on a per-student basis, the state made up the difference—and ended up channeling a lot more education money to cities like San Francisco than it did to those in Orange County. "Has it turned out to be unfair to Orange County? Absolutely," said David Doerr, another A138 consultant. "But it was the only practical way to do it." By the 1990s, proposals for reform were popping up more frequently. In 1996, both the Constitutional Revision Commission and the Legislative Analyst's Office came to the same conclusion for reform: Let local governments decide how split up the money raised in their jurisdiction once the state has extracted a share for schools. The problem was not only opposition from high-percentage cities like San Francisco http://www2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=39720§ion=NEWS&year=... 5/23/2003 Date ^. Penny Kyle 0 Regrs Immediate Action Board Secretary 0 High Priority Action Phone: 714-593-7130 0 Routine Priority Action Fax: 714-962-0356 0 Information Only Email: pkyle@ocsd.com 0 To 0 Other ` / L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. Box 8127—10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 ,A no-win proposition for Orange County Page 1 of 4 Sunday,May 18,2003 A no-win proposition for Orange County Decades after Prop. 13, politicians are seeking parity for their local governments with little success. By MARTIN WISCKOL The Orange County Register The words spill out like honey as Joel Fox explains the grand success of Proposition 13, the landmark 1978 initiative that dramatically reduced and capped then-spiraling property taxes. But the enthusiasm drains from his voice as the conversation turns to how those cuts are distributed. Under the system, Orange County's local governments and special districts share 37 percent of property taxes collected within its borders, while San Francisco's get 67 percent and Los Angeles' get 60 percent. "The distribution system needs some work," said Fox, an aide to Prop. 13 author Howard Jarvis and later president of the Jarvis Taxpayers Association. "It was just the quickest, smoothest way to get something in place at the time." June 6 marks the 25th anniversary of voters' overwhelming approval of Prop. 13. For the past 10 years, there has been a growing clamor to change how the property taxes are divvied up, with proposals for reform being presented —and rejected —at an ever-faster clip. "Everybody knows (the distribution system) is obsolete," said Chris McKenzie, executive director of the California League of Cities. "The devil is in the details." Not surprisingly, a good share of proposed reforms carry the fingerprints of Orange County officials. The inequity means less money for services here—services like recreation, child care and health care. Orange County spends $57 per capita annually on health care, compared with the average of$192 per capita for the state's 26 counties—generally the largest ones — that run their own programs for the medically indigent. "In other counties, you don't have to be sick to get help," said Nancy Rimsha, a legal-aid attorney who represents the county's medically indigent. "If we had more money in the system, we could provide preventative and diagnostic health care, rather than being an emergency-room reimbursement program." If you can't afford health care, the county will pull your decayed tooth —but not fill it. In many cases, it will fix one eye with cataracts, but not both. It can take two months to apply and be approved for treatment. Take the case of Joe Tessitore, a Fullerton window installer with no health insurance. Constant headaches and shooting pains from his neck into his skull — possibly the delayed effect of a car accident— became so bad that by the beginning http://www2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=39720§ion=NEWS&year=... 5/23/2003 A no-win proposition for Orange County Page 2 of 4 of this month he could no longer work. An emergency-room visit to St. Jude Medical Center on May 3 got him some painkillers — and a May 19 appointment to apply for county-funded medical care. A definitive diagnosis and treatment still could be a month away while the county processes the application. "There's not much I can do but lay on the couch, waiting," said Tessitore, 38. "I've called everywhere I can think of(for help). It's frustrating." 'The long knives' While Howard Jarvis knew how he wanted property taxes cut—slashed to 1 percent of assessed value— Prop. 13 did not address distribution of the smaller pool of revenue to the governments that use it. So legislative consultants drew up a number of plans, including one in which each city and county government would get an equal percentage. But because some cities and counties had much higher property-tax rates than others before Prop. 13, the plan would hit some hard while leaving low-taxing governments relatively unscathed. It was a tense time. "We referred to it as the night of the long knives," said Fred Silva, then a Senate consultant working on the plan, Assembly Bill 8. "Cities were coming up and saying this plan or that plan would destroy them." The Legislature agreed on a formula in which the percentage of property taxes was tied to the level of property taxes levied before Prop. 13. San Francisco had high taxes, so it got a bigger percentage. Dana Point and Irvine had low taxes, so they got smaller percentages. Percentages varied, but the degree of pain was, at least in theory, equal. The property-tax revenue that remained — after shelling out shares to local government and special districts —was given to schools. Because the state guarantees a minimum funding to schools on a per-student basis, the state made up the difference— and ended up channeling a lot more education money to cities like San Francisco than it did to those in Orange County. "Has it turned out to be unfair to Orange County? Absolutely," said David Doerr, another AB8 consultant. "But it was the only practical way to do it." By the 1990s, proposals for reform were popping up more frequently. In 1996, both the Constitutional Revision Commission and the Legislative Analyst's Office came to the same conclusion for reform: Let local governments decide how split up the money raised in their jurisdiction once the state has extracted a share for schools. The problem was not only opposition from high-percentage cities like San Francisco http://www2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=39720§ion=NEWS&yeas—... 5/23/2003 .A no-win proposition for Orange County Page 3 of 4 but also the likelihood of local governments fighting among themselves as they tried to figure out how to share the taxes. Anaheim Mayor Curt Pringle, an assemblyman in the 1990s, said these conflicts have prevented the sweeping reform that's needed. "It's a dysfunctional taxing system, but very few people are looking at a global reform," he said. "They're looking at parochial protection." Housing crisis Orange County Supervisor Chris Norby is one of those looking at large-scale reform —a redistribution of property taxes that would give all cities 60 percent of what they generate and that would encourage building homes instead of stores. But even Norby still is tinkering to find a formula that would win enough support for approval. More common are piecemeal proposals like Assembly Bill 1568 by Assemblyman Lou Correa, D-Anaheim, which would increase the property-tax percentage for counties receiving the least. But this is a tough sell in deficit-ridden Sacramento, which would have to make up the difference. Slightly better odds for passage are given to Assembly Bill 1221 by Assemblymen Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, and John Campbell, R-Newport Beach. Like Norby, the assemblymen are concerned with the existing incentives to build stores rather than homes. Because of the low amount of property taxes generated by homes — particularly condominiums and apartments— cities rarely receive enough to cover the cost of services. But retail uses — particularly the big-box stores and auto malls —generate sales taxes that go directly to the cities, paying several times over for local government costs associated with the businesses. "Young families just starting out can't find apartments to live in," Campbell said. "But cities go backward economically to provide them." AB1221 would redirect half of the cities' sales taxes to the state then give the cities an equal amount back by increasing their share of property taxes. This diminishes the incentives to build stores and provides a less-volatile revenue source. But AB1221 does not deal with the fundamental distribution inequity—and still is running into opposition, including that from cities committed to attracting as much retail as possible. It has yet to go before the full Assembly. When it comes to achieving a fully equitable solution, Sacramento veterans say somebody would have to lose money, making that prospect unlikely to ever win approval. "Aside from little incremental steps, it's going to take some kind of guided missile to blow up (if there is to be substantial change)," said Silva, who now works for the Public Policy Institute. "Something like a Supreme Court ruling deciding what the http://www2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=39720§ion=NEWS&year=... 5/23/2003 A no-win proposition for Orange County Page 4 of-4 system should be, although previous lawsuits have failed. "With the current system, we're like a dysfunctional family, and we just can't get it together." CONTACT US: (714) 285-2867 or mwisckol@ocregister.com Orange County: A property-tax loser This clydi t,for [lie 12 must San Francisco pOpUlUUS counties,shows 1Los Angeles . - �99r7lfi: the percentage of the proper bi tax collected Alameda - :.,,. --_55,7S within its borders that San Bernardino 53."` each county receives for its combined county and Riverside 52.0% cigr governments and i is Contra Costa 50.9% special district,Orange County ranks 40th among Sacramento all 58 counties.These Ventura ;,. .-;48.0% calculations do not include Dane 403% school districts,which receive an equal amount Fresno � *�*,?39-50% per student from a San Woo 38.1% combination of property taxes and state funds. sanfa Clara �37196 5ourrp:Calitomla Boar)or Note:Does not include property-tax increment revenue EgLolizalion,final yUar 2001-0002 from redevelopment districts. The Register http://www2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=39720§ion=NEWS&year=... 5/23/2003 -----Original Message----- From: Anderson, Blake b, Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:37 PM To: Beekman, Carol Subject: Another thing for the board package Los Angeles Daily News State needs to spend the money to rebuild itself By Sarah Layton Wallace Tuesday,May 20, 2003 - The emphasis on rebuilding infrastructure in the reconstruction of Iraq is a somber reminder that a working infrastructure is essential to the economy and livability of a country -- or a state. Yet California's infrastructure -- which is vital to the daily lives of 35 million Californians --has been allowed to steadily decline, despite the state's enormous population growth. While infrastructure needed to rebuild Iraq will no doubt be portrayed as a long-term investment, multibillion- dollar infrastructure projects in California have in large part been seen as budget-busting,one-time expenditures. This view has led to a haphazard approach to funding needed to build sewer systems, roads, transit,water delivery systems,parks and other vital projects. Avoiding maintenance to save money ultimately costs taxpayers more and reduces the value of public assets. The need is pressing on all fronts. Californians face longer, slower commutes because vehicle-lane miles have increased just 7 percent over the past three decades and commuters often do not have viable options other than their cars. California could be short up to 6 million acre-feet of water annually(depending on rainfall) by 2020 because 5/27/2003 Message Page 2 of 3 r e-- storage capacity for the state's most valuable resource has increased only minimally since 1970, despite a 75 y percent increase in population -- much of it in the state's driest areas. Libraries, parks,public buildings and other infrastructure systems that quietly form the fabric of our communities have suffered similar neglect. It is more than just a matter of enjoying amenities; quality infrastructure systems are also essential to keeping and attracting businesses that fuel local economies and the state's job growth. State and local governments can seize the opportunity to benefit from interest rates at historic lows to fund infrastructure projects that will improve economic opportunities and enhance the quality of life in our communities. But several political obstacles must be overcome. Infrastructure planning at the state level has, in recent times, largely been an ad hoc approach that focuses on individual projects rather than long-term needs. Projects with the highest priority are often those that have been neglected over the years and are now reaching the crisis stage. In some cases, initiatives and special-project bonds divert much-needed funds away from long- term needs. The smarter approach is to plan ahead and build projects early -- when the price tag is lower--rather than waiting until the last possible moment. One vehicle to help this happen is a ballot measure approved by the Legislature and scheduled for next year that will dedicate a small percentage of the general fund to maintaining and building state and local infrastructure systems. The requirement that two-thirds of voters approve funding measures is greatly hampering local governments' ability to meet infrastructure needs. Every year, many local tax and bond measures receive 60 percent or more of the vote but still fail, creating a cycle of greater need and even less politically palatable proposals. Although it is unlikely politically that the threshold will be lowered to a simple majority, a 55-percent requirement similar to what school bonds must meet would give communities a greater opportunity to fund vital projects. Infrastructure is an overwhelming topic for elected officials, which is why regional input and citizen engagement must be a routine element of policy decisions. Many decisions made at the state level do not adequately consider local needs or their effects on neighboring regions. Local citizens representing diverse interests and neighborhoods can help legislators understand how infrastructure problems and opportunities affect the local economy. Long-term infrastructure planning is essential to a sound and thriving economy. Until elected officials realize that infrastructure is an investment not an expense, Californians will face increasing economic and social challenges. In the end, infrastructure isn't about pipe or concrete; it's about preserving and enhancing the quality of life in 5/27/2003 Message Page 3 of 3 t 6 California communities. Sarah Layton Wallace is the executive vice president of the California Rebuild America Coalition. 5/27/2003 ! BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING May 28, 2003 — 7:00 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Garden Grove Bill Dalton Bruce Broadwater G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agendas\2003 Board Agendas\032603 supplemental.doc SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING May 28, 2003 — 7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplernental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 18. a. 4. Confer with General Counsel re Chris Garland v. Orange County Sanitation District, Worker's Compensation Appeals Board Case No. RIV 0049190 (Government Code Section 54956.9). G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agendas\2003 Board Agendas\052803 supplemental agenda.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on a� , 2003, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on , 2003. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this � day of 2003. �r Penny M. K e, Secretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District G:1WP.DTAIADMINIBSIFORMSIAGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC � =�`oJN�SANI/fit/off` ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Penn " y Kyle (2 copies no label) Board Secretary May 22, 2003 phone: (714)962-2411 fax: To the Chair and Members (7141962-0356 of the Board of Directors www.ocsd.com mailing address: Subject: Board Letter PO. Box 8127 Fountain Valley.CA 92728-8127 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional Street address: information on any of the items, please call me. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Biosolids Environmental Management System Audit Member For a week in March, the District's Environmental Management System (EMS) for Agencies Biosolids was audited by the National Biosolids Partnership, an alliance of the Environmental Protection Agency, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Cities and Water Environment Federation. Anaheim Brea During the exit interview, the auditors complimented the District on our biosolids Buena Park management program, knowledgeable staff, excellent Source Control and Cypress Fountain Valley preventative maintenance programs, Integrated Emergency Response Plan, and Fullerton philosophy of continual improvement. The auditors found several areas where they Garden Grove want us to improve, such as linking policy with practice, and documenting how Board Huntington Beach P 9 P Y P g Irvine policy is translated through the chain of command to the workers in the plant and the La Habra contractors out in the field who apply our product to the land. Our staff is working to La Palma Los Alamitos close the identified gaps and within 60 days we will be ready for a return visit by the Newport Beach auditors and a recommendation to certify our Biosolids EMS. The District is the first in Orange Placentia the nation to be audited and we hope we will be the first in the nation to be certified. Santa Ana Seal Beach GWRS Public Information & Outreach Program Stanton Tustin Villa Park A summary of recent communication with elected officials, opinion leaders, Yorba Linda supporters and other interested parties follows: County of Orange February Sanitary Districts ■ Mailed letter to nearly 500 elected officials, opinion leaders and supporters Costa Mesa informing them of the ad program Midway City March Water Districts ■ Distributed Southeast Barrier Pipeline construction media release to nearly 1,000 elected officials, opinion leaders, supporters and other interested parties Irvine Ranch ■ Mailed news clip package to nearly 500 elected officials, opinion leaders and supporters. April • Distributed Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors, Orange County award media release to nearly 1,000 elected officials, opinion leaders supporters and other interested parties via fast fax and email blast. To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resou,ce management 4O JN51 5 A 11I 1 lipH � � O O N = 9 O Board of Directors Page 2 May 22, 2003 ■ Distributed Los Angeles Times, Orange County editorial, which stated support for the Groundwater Replenishment System (April 21) to nearly 500 elected officials, opinion leaders and supporters via fast fax. OCSD Wins CWEA Awards The California Water Environmental Association (CWEA) recently honored OCSD with two awards. The Communications Department was awarded the Public Education of the Year Award while Source Control Supervisor Kelly Christensen was named the Industrial and Hazardous Waste Person of the Year. The Public Education Award of the Year recognizes small projects (under$20,000) which increase awareness and understanding of water quality and environmental issues among the public. The Wastewater Survivor Relay Course was recognized as an excellent tool for educating young children about the wastewater treatment process. The Industrial and Hazardous Waste Control Person of the Year is awarded to the professional from an industry, consulting firm, academia, regulatory, or public agency with more than three years experience, who has made a significant personal contribution to the field of industrial and hazardous waste control. Kelly Christensen has worked for OCSD for 22 years. He supervises a staff of 14 and is a founding member of the Orange County Hazardous Materials Strike Force, which coordinates environmental crime investigations with the district attorney's office. Jeff Brown, a member of the operations research group, won a second place Engineering Research Achievement award for a project on high-powered ultrasonic sludge treatment. The awards were presented at the 75th annual California Water Environment Association conference in Ontario California. Disinfection Update OCSD's final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility disinfection system, which has now been in operation for nine months. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. April 2003 results for total coliform averaged 2,800 MPN/100 ml (with a maximum daily value of 30,000 MPN/100 ml) down from an average bacteria level in the final effluent of 25,000,000 MPN/100 ml prior to disinfection. After a 180:1 dilution across the outfall diffuser, the average total coliform at the bottom of the ocean 4.2 miles away from shore is approximatley 16 MPN/100 mi. The final effluent had a maximum 0.19 ppm chlorine residual averaged over six hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm compliance limit. The maximum hourly value on any day was 0.57 ppm chlorine residual. Additional disinfection data is reported on the Web @ www.ocsd.com. 4�JN`+ SANIIAI,OY � � O � = i 6 Board of Directors Page 2 May 22, 2003 ■ Distributed Los Angeles Times, Orange County editorial, which stated support for the Groundwater Replenishment System (April 21) to nearly 500 elected officials, opinion leaders and supporters via fast fax. OCSD Wins CWEA Awards The California Water Environmental Association (CWEA) recently honored OCSD with two awards. The Communications Department was awarded the Public Education of the Year Award while Source Control Supervisor Kelly Christensen was named the Industrial and Hazardous Waste Person of the Year. The Public Education Award of the Year recognizes small projects (under$20,000) which increase awareness and understanding of water quality and environmental issues among the public. The Wastewater Survivor Relay Course was recognized as an excellent tool for educating young children about the wastewater treatment process. The Industrial and Hazardous Waste Control Person of the Year is awarded to the professional from an industry, consulting firm, academia, regulatory, or public agency with more than three years experience, who has made a significant personal contribution to the field of industrial and hazardous waste control. Kelly Christensen has worked for OCSD for 22 years. He supervises a staff of 14 and is a founding member of the Orange County Hazardous Materials Strike Force, which coordinates environmental crime investigations with the district attorney's office. Jeff Brown, a member of the operations research group, won a second place Engineering Research Achievement award for a project on high-powered ultrasonic sludge treatment. The awards were presented at the 75th annual California Water Environment Association conference in Ontario California. Disinfection Update OCSD's final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility disinfection system, which has now been in operation for nine months. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. April 2003 results for total coliform averaged 2,800 MPN/100 ml (with a maximum daily value of 30,000 MPN/100 ml) down from an average bacteria level in the final effluent of 25,000,000 MPN/100 ml prior to disinfection. After a 180:1 dilution across the outfall diffuser, the average total coliform at the bottom of the ocean 4.2 miles away from shore is approximatley 16 MPN/100 mi. The final effluent had a maximum 0.19 ppm chlorine residual averaged over six hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm compliance limit. The maximum hourly value on any day was 0.57 ppm chlorine residual. Additional disinfection data is reported on the Web @ www.ocsd.com. `oJMj3 SIINII.1liHH � � o b � A !` Board of Directors Page 3 May 22, 2003 The Board approved the upgraded bleach/dechlorination (dechlor) facilities in January 2003 and construction will be completed in the fall of 2003. These upgraded bleach and dechlorination facilities will be used until we determine the long-term technology that will be used for disinfection and then design and construct the new facilities. Secondary Treatment Standards Update All operationally available secondary treatment facilities are online. We continue to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. The final effluent is a blend of 72% secondary treatment and 28% primary treatment, which surpasses our target of 64% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During April 2003, it averaged 34 ppm TSS and 59 ppm BOD. The secondary treatment goal is 30/30 ppm BOD and TSS. In June 2003, the trickling filter secondary treatment plant will be removed from service. The trickling filter will be replaced during the next 2.5 years. When removed, the secondary effluent percentage will decrease because the trickling filters provide about 15 mgd of secondary treatment. The secondary percentage will be reduced to about 65%. Watch for These Two Cable Programs "The Silva Update"— Blake Anderson was interviewed by Supervisor Jim Silva for his talk show "The Silva Update." This was an excellent forum to discuss critical issues facing OCSD and helps better inform the public. Look for this 30 minute program on local cable channels in the cities of Costa Mesa, Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Newport Beach, Seal Beach, Stanton, Rossmoor, Santa Ana Heights, Sunset Beach and Surfside during the months of May and June. "Your City Your Issues"— Council Member Debbie Cook interviewed Mike Bock, Resident Engineer and Carla Dillon, Senior Engineer in Air Quality and Special Projects on two topics that are concerns for the residents in Huntington Beach: the Bushard Trunk Sewer Replacement Project and Odor Control. HBTV-3 programming is broadcast via Time Warner Cable on Channel 3. The opportunity to provide outreach/education on a local television program provides an important communications vehicle for OCSD neighbors. It is our responsibility and goal - to inform the community we affect about the need for the project. By informing the neighbors, it will increase awareness and cooperation for the project. 4oJN`y SANIr,/0 � � O 6 t i 9 Board of Directors Page 4 May 22, 2003 Community Outreach OCSD hosted two information booths on April 26 for Earth Day. They were the La Habra Children's Museum — Imagination Celebration and the Huntington Beach Earth Day Expo at the pier. The "Save the Sea Life Game" featured at the La Habra event reinforced good habits of keeping pollution out of our streets and waterways and proved excellent opportunity to educate the residents of an inland community on the harmful effects of urban runoff. OCSD featured the award winning "Rapid Wastewater Relay" at this year's Children's Water Education Festival 2003 on May 6-7. Twenty-two classes of 3`d and 41h grade students learned what it takes to collect, treat and recycle wastewater in Orange County though this hands-on activity. Warner Avenue Protect A neighborhood meeting was held on April 29 at Harbor View School within the project area. Approximately ten people attended to hear a brief presentation and to ask questions regarding the project. Staff was available for questions and answers. A second meeting will be held with the neighborhood because there are members of the community upset about potential traffic impacts. City of Huntington Beach staff will be present. If you'd like further information regarding the meetings please contact Jennifer Cabral (714) 593-7581. Bushard Trunk Sewer Replacement Construction updates continue to go out to affected areas, the most recent notification went out this week informing residents of a project related street closure. The street closure was scheduled to begin on May 19 at Rambler Drive on the east side of Bushard. This closure is estimated to last approximately one month. Along with the notification to the residents a map of the detour was included, redirecting residents to alternate routes. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:Ij GAWP.DTAIADMINIGM\LETTERS TO THE BOARD1031052103 BOARD LETTER.DOC T t AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING May 28, 2003 — 7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 05/28/03 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager 1. 30/30 Monthly Update C. Report of General Counsel 7. Open nominations for Chair of the Board of Directors (Election to be held at the regular June Board Meeting). 8. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the informational workshop held on April 16, 2003 and the regular meeting held on April 23, 2003 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 04/15/03 04/30/03 Totals $10,126,201.94 $6,076,269.09 DIRECTORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving OCSD. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with OCSD. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. 05/28/03 Page 3 Y CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 10. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Approve reimbursement agreement with the County of Orange, Public Facilities and Resources Department (Agreement No. D03-41), providing for the District to reimburse to the County an estimated amount not to exceed $15,210 in conjunction with the County's 2003-2004 Overlay Maintenance Program to raise and adjust approximately 39 District manholes. b. Approve an agreement with Costa Mesa Sanitary District for Grant of Property Rights in Sewer Pipeline and Assignment of Accompanying Easement Rights in connection with Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer—Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, in a form approved by General Counsel, providing for payment of annual user fees of$5,252.57 for five years. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 05/28/03 Page 4 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re May 28, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES — NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 23, 2003 to be filed. C. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the May 28, 2003 meeting. d. Verbal report by Chair of Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee re May 7 and May 21, 2003 meetings. e. DRAFT URBAN RUNOFF AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES — NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 7, 2003, to be filed. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re May 1, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES — NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 1, 2003 to be filed. C. Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro, Inc. for Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of $63,449, increasing the total amount not to exceed $2,345,197 d. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, with Green Giant Landscape, Inc., authorizing an addition of$12,761, increasing the total contract amount to $413,187; and, (2) Accept Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ninyo & Moore, to provide for Materials Testing, Inspection, and Geotechnical Engineering Service, Specification No. PSA-2001-33BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $100,000. f. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush & Associates, to provide for Surveying Services, Specification No. PSA-2001-34BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $95,000 for each agreement ($285,000 total). 05/28/03 Page 5 g. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Electro Test Inc., to provide Electrical Acceptance Testing Services, Specification No. PSA-2001-3513D, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $175,000. h. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Smith Emery GeoServices, to provide for Materials Testing, Inspection, and Geotechnical Engineering Service, Specification No. PSA-2002-33BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $100,000. i. (1) Establish a budget in the amount of$262,800 for Underground Storage Tank Evaluation and Remediation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98; and, (2) Approve Professional Services Agreement for Underground Storage Tank Evaluation and Remediation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98, with KOMEX, to provide testing and evaluation services, for an amount not to exceed $96,231. j. Approve partial payment of funds to the City of Garden Grove for Contract No. CP-0003 that was originally budgeted in FY2000-01, in the amount of $84,852.98. k. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation, providing for construction support services for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, for an additional amount of $2,082,459, increasing the total amount not to exceed $6,196,938. I. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Program Management Consultants, a joint venture of Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. and CH2M Hill, Inc., authorizing: (1) An increase in the amount of $35,000,000 to the five-year agreement, for a total amount not to exceed $50,000,000; (2) An increase for the first year of the agreement for an additional amount of $449,934, increasing the total amount not to exceed $4,385,217 for FY2002/03; and, (3) Establish an amount not to exceed $12,484,750 for year two of the contract, FY2003/04. M. (1) Receive and file a petition requesting annexation of 4.80 Acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Bolsa Chica Avenue and Los Patos Avenue, bordering the East Garden Grove Wintersburg channel in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-08, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29 - Shea Homes Annexation). The following item was considered and recommended for approval by the PDC Committee meeting held on April 3, 2003: 05/28/03 Page 6 n. Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, with JW Contracting Corporation, authorizing an addition of $199,346, increasing the total contract amount to $10,692,025. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re May 14, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES — NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 14, 2003 to be filed. (Minutes to be distributed at 05128103 Board Meeting.) C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2003. d. Receive and file the 2002-03 Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ending March 31, 2003. e. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2003 through March 31, 2003. f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-10, approving Orange County Sanitation District Amended Deferred Compensation Plan (2003) for Officers and Employees of the District. g. Approve an increase of $1.00 per hour to the Intern pay range grade 0 ($10.00 - $17.00), in support of the new Student Intern Program, to be effective May 28, 2003. h. Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 29546 issued to Health Science and Associates for completion of a Comprehensive Asbestos Survey, providing for additional sampling to comply with Environmental Protection Agency and Cal-OSHA regulations for an additional amount of$51,993.65, for a total amount not to exceed $113,163.00. i. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-11, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for classification structure adjustments as follows: a) Create the CIP Project Manager classification at pay range 88 ($6,578 - $8,222) and a Senior CIP Project Manager at pay grade 92 ($7,260 - $9,075) b) Create the Accounting Supervisor classification at pay grade 86 ($6,260 - $7,825) c) Move the Materials Control Supervisor classification from pay grade 81 ($5,534 - S6,917) to pay grade 83 (55,814 - $7,267). 05/28/03 Page 7 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re May 12, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES — NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 14, 2003 to be filed. 16. (1) Approve plans and specifications for Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid protest letter dated May 1, 2003 from Colich Construction; (4) Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated May 8, 2003; (5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (6) Reject the bid protest of Colich Construction, and waive any irregularity associated with the Bidder's Bond, Power of Attorney, submitted by ARB, Inc.; and, (7) Award a contract to ARB, Inc., for Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, for an amount not to exceed $5,089,040. 17. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-20, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Revised Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Revised Capital Facilities Capacity Charges; Reaffirming Established Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-18 and Ordinance No. OCSD-19 a. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-20 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) b. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-20, and pass to second reading and public hearing on June 25, 2003. 05/28/03 Page 8 18. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel - Potential Litigation. Initiation of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c): One (1) potential matter. 2. Confer with General Counsel re pending matter of litigation, Sargent v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 02CC11206 (Government Code Section 54956.9). 3. Confer with Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Director and Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel, re Meet and Confer Update (Government Code Section 54957.6). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 19, Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 21. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for June 25, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. 22. Adjournments i • 05/28/03 Page 9 r ; .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... !NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by :Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. :General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 banderson(a-)ocsd.com :Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 pkyle@ocsd.com :Director/Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 dIudwinCcDocsd.corn 'Director/Finance/Treasurer Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 gstreedC@ocsd.com Director/Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 Itomko .ocsd.corn :Director/Information Technology Patrick Miles (714) 593-7280 pmiles@ocsd.com :Director/Operations & Maintenance Bob Ooten (714) 593-7020 rooten(@ocsd.com Director/Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714) 593-7400 rghirelli(@ocsd.com ":Administrative Services Mgr. Greg Mathews (714)593-7104 g math ewsQocsd.com 'Communications Services Mgr. Carol Beekman (714) 593-7120 cbeekman(@ocsd.com :General Counsel Thomas L.Woodruff 714 564-2605 tlw wss-law.com ........................................m,,, ,.....,..,.,.,.,,............,............................................ In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Board Secretary's office at (714) 593-7130 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to allow the District to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\Agenda\052803 draft agenda.doc ' Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Open nominations for Chair of Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June Board Meeting) SUMMARY As provided in the Board's Rules of Procedures, nominations for the Chair are made at the regular May meeting and remain open until election, which takes place at the June meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Chair will be conducted at the June regular meeting. For new Directors' information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. "G. CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD. A Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board shall be elected by a majority vote of Directors at the regular meeting in June of each year, and will assume office July 1 st. The nominations for Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in May of each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement setting forth their qualifications for the office of Chairperson. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Board of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the June regular meeting. The nominations and election for Vice Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Chairperson. The elected Vice Chairperson will assume office July 1 st. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Chairperson becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairperson shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairperson and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Vice Chairperson becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\050311em 7.Election.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 1 meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Directors. Subject to the provisions about serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors, the Chairperson shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms for which he/she has been elected to the office of Chairperson." PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\ltem 7.Election.doc Revised: 8/20.198 Page 2 1 Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD WORKSHOP APRIL 16, 2003 saNlr,�r�o p � N 4 � O --1 HE E� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �f Minutes for Board Workshop Page 2 Q 04/16/03 A Workshop of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on April 16, 2003, at 6:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. The following Directors were in attendance: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken, Chair Bob Hernandez X Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Leland Wilson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz X Alberta Christy Mike Garcia X John Collins Larry Crandall X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Brian Donahue David Shawver X Michael Duvall Ked Lynn Wilson A Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X Alice B. Jempsa Marilynn M. Poe X Tony Kawashima Doug Davert A Beth Krom Christina Shea X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Patsy Marshall Jim Dow X Robert McGowan Richard A. Freschi X Roy Moore John Beauman X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan A Tod Ridgeway Don Webb A Jim Silva Chuck Smith Paul Walker X Larry Herman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Carol Beekman; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Doug Stewart; Matt Smith; Jim Burror OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Thomas Nixon; Jerry Thibeault; Garry Brown; Debbie Burris; Eileen Murphy; Graham Juby; Duane Jensen; G. Van Drie; James Clark; Brian Jordan; Geoff Costhew; Harmik Aghanian; Shivaji Deshmukm; Bill Everest; Steve Esmond; Kris Hardeman; Jeff Mohr; Richard Bardin; Irwin Haydock; Jan Vandersloot; Judith M. Gielow; Paul Mosley; Bill Hunter A R Minutes for Board Workshop Page 3 04/16/03 INTRODUCTION Chair Shirley McCracken noted that on July 17, 2002, the decision to go to full secondary treatment standards requires a substantial investment in new infrastructure. New priorities for the Capital Improvement program (CIP) must be established in order to achieve full secondary treatment standards. She noted that public comments would be received following the presentation. OVERVIEW General Manager Blake Anderson stated that the workshop would (1) provide a summary in context of the governing requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act and the District's principles of stewardship; (2) provide an overview of the CIP; (3) review and discuss the secondary treatment schedule; and (4) present the Peer Review Panel findings. PRESENTATIONS Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, provided an overview of the CIP (rehabilitation and new facilities); the validation process to provide for enhanced planning and improved business efficiencies; and the implementation plan for to reach full secondary treatment by December 31, 2012. Jerry Thibeault, Executive Officer of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and a member of the Peer Review Panel, reported that the Panel has reviewed and endorsed the District's plan for implementation of full secondary treatment by December 31, 2012. Garry Brown of Orange County Coastkeepers and a public member appointed to the Peer Review Panel, spoke of his support of the findings made by the panel. He also referred to his letter distributed to the Directors that evening that contained additional recommendations. Following the presentations, Directors entered into discussion and staff responded to their questions. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jan Vandersloot requested the Board of Directors to continue being receptive to public input on matters of water treatment. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the Workshop adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Secretary c f he Boar Directors of Orange County Sanitbbbn District G:1wp.dtaladmin\BS\Minutes1041603 draft workshop.doc Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING APRIL 23, 2003 ��.�•� sAnrjraro NG THE ENy� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 04/23/03 ' ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on April 23, 2003, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken, Chair Bob Hernandez X Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Leland Wilson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz X Alberta Christy Mike Garcia X John Collins Larry Crandall X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Brian Donahue David Shawver X Michael Duvall Keri Lynn Wilson A Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X Alice B. Jempsa Marilynn M. Poe Tony Kawashima X Doug Davert X Beth Krom Christina Shea X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Patsy Marshall Jim Dow X Robert McGowan Richard A. Freschi X Roy Moore John Beauman X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Don Webb X Jim Silva Chuck Smith A Paul Walker Larry Herman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Carol Beekman; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Jim Herberg; George Robertson; Doug Stewart; Mike Moore; Wendy Sevenandt; Ingrid Hellebrand; Jim Burror OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Randy Fuhrman; Brent Hayes; Eileen Murphy; Jack Skinner; Robert Craig; Larry Porter; Joan Irvine Smith; Laura Davick; Julie Y Minutes for Board Meeting ® Page 3 04/23/03 Bixby; Arlene Schafer; Phyllis Grifman; Marlene Noble; Burt Jones; Kris Hardeman; Monica Ruzich; Jan Vandersloot; Judith M. Gielow; Richard Bardin; Irwin Haydock PUBLIC COMMENTS The following spoke in opposition to the proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29— Shea Homes Annexation: Julie Bixby; Eileen Murphy; Monica Ruzich; Jan Vandersloot. Mr. Vandersloot also spoke in support of the Full Secondary Treatment Schedule for the Ocean Discharge Permit Application. Randy Fuhrman requested the sewer service user rates be increased at a more rapid rate for a reduced, overall long-term rate. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair McCracken reported the Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee would be meeting on Wednesday, May 71" at 3:00 p.m. The OMTS Committee Meeting, however, had been cancelled for the month of May. Director McCracken also noted there were several critical and very important items to be considered on the agenda that evening. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported on the progress of achieving 30/30 secondary treatment standards. The effluent quality continues to be in the mid-30s parts per million for suspended solids and the mid-50s parts per million for biochemical oxygen demand. Disinfection is continuing and state AB411 standards are being achieved at the end of the outfall. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held March 26, 2003, and the April 2, 2003, Special Meeting held in conjunction with the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting, be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/03 03/31/03 Totals $9,257,938.01 $6,249,729.11 Director Brian Donahue abstained from discussion and voting on Warrant No. 51720 pursuant to California Government Code Section 84308. L Minutes for Board Meeting SF Page 4 04/23/03 ° MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Remove Item 9(a) from the Consent Calendar. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Agreement with the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans), dated March 11, 2003, providing for Caltrans to pothole District's sewer facilities for positive location at no cost to the District, in a form approved by General Counsel. 10. Consideration of item deleted from Consent Calendar: 9.a. (1) Receive and file a petition requesting annexation of 4.80 Acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Bolsa Chica Avenue and Los Patos Avenue, bordering the East Garden Grove Wintersburg channel in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-08, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29 - Shea Homes Annexation). MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Following a brief discussion, Directors requested the consideration of Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29— Shea Homes Annexation, be sent to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee meeting on May 1, 2003 to discuss concerns that were expressed under public comments that evening. Director Mark Leyes requested the minutes reflect his arrival after consideration of Item 10. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the April 23, 2003 meeting. Chair McCracken reported on the progress of the Legislative Advocacy Ad Hoc Committee that is meeting weekly. The committee is working with staff and consultants on the initiatives the District is pursuing. Chair McCracken reported on items presented by staff and discussed by the committee: a) A letter was received from the City of Santa Ana opposing the proposed 15% user fee rate hike. b) The General Manager and Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, discussed an emerging concept for improving cooperation in the Orange County Coastal Plan for improving water quality. It could result in an MOU or other institutional arrangement between the County of Orange, Sanitation District and other public agencies. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 04/23/03 c) Due to a lack of substantive business for consideration by the OMTS Committee in May, it was determined the May 7� meeting be cancelled. d) A proposed county-wide development of a database for reporting and cataloguing sanitary sewer overflows and the work the District and others are doing to comply with the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board last year was discussed. The Steering Committee directed staff to evaluate the costs if the District were to act as the county-wide coordinator for these compliance efforts and report to the OMTS Committee with recommendations on how much of a role the District should play and the associated costs. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 26, 2003 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jim Ferryman, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the March 5, 2003 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 5, 2003 to be filed. C. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, briefly reviewed the reasons for conducting the Summer 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, and introduced Marlene Noble of USGS and Burt Noble of USC representing the team of principal investigators, and Phyllis Grifman of USC Sea Grant representing the scientific peer review panel. They reviewed the findings from their extensive investigation of the coastal ocean circulation and transport pathways off Huntington Beach, with the goal of identifying any causal links that may exist between the effluent discharged through the outfall and bacterial contamination along the Huntington Beach shoreline. It was concluded that the District's plume is not a major cause of beach contamination and no causal links could be demonstrated at AB 411 levels. The peer review panel concurred with this finding and directed that further analysis of the data be performed to determine whether the outfall is a contributor of bacteria at levels below the AB 411 threshold. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the following reports in connection with the Summer 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III study: (1) Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III: Coastal Circulation and Transport Patterns: The Likelihood of OCSD's Plume Impacting the Huntington Beach Shoreline Executive Summary, prepared by US Geological Survey, dated March 2003; (2) Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III — Peer Review Panel Summary Report prepared by University of Southern California Minutes for Board Meeting v Page 6 04/23/03 ' Sea Grant Program and University of California, Santa Barbara Marine Institute, dated March 2003; and, (3) Receive and file Marine Monitoring Annual Report for 2002 prepared by Orange County Sanitation District. d. (1) Authorize a budget amendment in the amount of $16,555,000 for Advanced Asset Management Improvement Program, Job No. SP-68-2, for development and implementation over a four year period; and (2) Award a sole source consulting services agreement to Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc. for professional consulting and implementation services for Phase 2, Asset Management Improvement Program, Job No. SP-68, for a two-year period, for an amount not to exceed $7,279,124, with option to renew for an additional two-year period for an amount not to exceed $5,683,479 upon Board approval. Doug Stewart, Project Manager, reviewed the proposed Advanced Asset Management Improvement Program listing some examples of how the program could assist staff in better managing existing assets, as well as those additional assets from the facilities to be built to meet full secondary treatment requirements. Directors entered into lengthy discussion asking several questions about the program, and expressed concern over the sole source to Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, as well as the cost of the overall program. It was suggested that an independent peer review panel review the program and proposal for validation. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Direct staff to investigate and research with the University of California, Irvine and other alternatives to establish a qualified peer review panel, and report to the Board of Directors of their findings. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Donahue, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the April 3, 2003 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 3, 2003 to be filed, as corrected. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1 A, with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of$126,720, increasing the total contract amount to $6,688,181. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate a Minutes for Board Meeting ' Page 7 04/23/03 Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$54,992 and a time extension of 21 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $70,934,528. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62, with Ark Construction Co., authorizing an addition of$60,399 and a time extension of 396 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $430,399. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve plans and specifications for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Q, Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation - Units D through Q, Job No. SP-73, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4) Award a construction contract to J. F. Shea Construction, Inc.,for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Q, Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation - Units D through Q, Job No. SP-73,for an amount not to exceed $1,485,239. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Brian Brady, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the April 9, 2003 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 9, 2003 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2003. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve SAFETY-POL-102— Personal Protective Equipment Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. e. Approve a 15% increase to the Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee Schedule for FY 03/04, based upon a total Single Family Residence rate of$100.50, and review the user fee structure in one year. A motion was made and seconded to approve a 20% increase to the Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee Schedule for FY 03/04, and review the user fee structure in one year. Directors entered into discussion regarding the user fee schedule structure, and the impact to businesses as well as homeowners. A substitute motion was made and seconded to raise the rates 20% per year for a five-year period. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 ' 04/23/03 A substitute to the substitute motion was made to delay the vote on the level of increase to allow the City of Santa Ana to study the impact on businesses. The maker of the motion withdrew his motion. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a 20% increase to the Sanitary Sewer Service User Charge each year for a period of five years, based upon a Single Family Residence rate of$105.00 for FY03/04. The motion carried by a vote of 13 ayes and 9 nays. Directors Steve Anderson; Don Bankhead; Brian Brady; Alberta Christy; John Collins; Alice Jempsa; Mark Leyes; Patsy Marshall; and Joy Neugebauer opposed. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Direct staff and General Counsel to take all necessary steps to have the District issue up to $280 million in new fixed-rate Certificates of Participation (COP) debt; (2) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Public Resources Advisory Group, providing for financial advisory services relating to the issuance of new certificates of participation, for an amount not to exceed $75,000; and, (3) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to provide bond counsel services relating to the issuance of new Certificates of Participation in an amount not to exceed $125,000. 15. DRAFT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Steve Anderson, member of the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on April 14, 2003. The Chair ordered the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 10, 2003 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Resolution No. OCSD 03-09, a Joint Resolution of the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District, declaring the Groundwater Replenishment System will comply with all conditions recommended by the Hearing Officer of the State of California Department of Health Services. Directors Brian Brady and Mark Leyes opposed. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve and authorize execution of Real Property Lease Agreement with the Orange County Water District, for a 6.69 acre parcel at the intersection of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the City of Fountain Valley,for the construction and operation of advanced water treatment facilities, commencing March 1, 2003 and expiring 30 years after the Groundwater Replenishment System becomes operational, in connection with Article 25 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 04/23/03 Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project, at a cost of$1.00 per year, in a form approved by General Counsel. Director Mark Leyes opposed. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD)to Kiewit Pacific Company for construction of Initial Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution Elements I & II Project, Contract No. GWRS-2003-1,for an amount not to exceed $17,139,646, with OCWD and OCSD paying equal shares of$8,569,823. Director Mark Leyes opposed. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Huntington Beach, providing for a temporary fire station facility and related staffing costs in connection with Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, in an amount not to exceed $264,500, in a form approved by General Counsel. 17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to submit the Full Secondary Treatment Schedule for the Ocean Discharge Permit Application to the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, consistent with Resolution No. OCSD 02-14, Establishing the Policy for Level of Treatment of Wastewater Discharged into the Ocean. 18. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.8 AND 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 10:12 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8 and 54956.9 to discuss Agenda Item Nos. 18(a) (1), (2), and (3). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of action taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item Nos. 18(a)(1) and (2). The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 18(a)(3), and no report was given. Directors Brian Brady and Mike Duvall removed themselves from the room during the consideration of Agenda Item No. 18(a)(2). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 10:40 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Secretary o he Board qqWpctors of Orange Cou ty Sanita ' District Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 51228 Orange County Sanitation District $ 547,762.92 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 51229 Southern California Edison 63,060.02 Power 51230 U.S. Peroxide 297,881.86 Hydrogen Peroxide 51231 Woodruff, Spradlin& Smart 132,864.76 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 51232 American Industrial Hygiene Association 170.00 Membership 51233 Axeda Systems, Inc. 6,364.58 Software, Maintenance&Support- CaGlance Prof. Edition 51234 AT&T Universal Biller 2,855.00 Telephone Service 51235 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 68.02 Telephone Service 51236 AT&T Wireless Services- Airtime 3,563.19 Cellular Telephone Service 51237 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 51238 BNI Building News 640.45 Publication 51239 City of Costa Mesa 6,000.00 Construction-Sidewalk Repairs 0 College Ave. Pump Station 51240 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 51241 Compressor Components Of California 1,260.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51242 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 86.50 Electrical Supplies 51243 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 675.57 Plumbing Supplies 51244 Corporate Express 3,893.59 Office Supplies 51245 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 51246 CW EA Specialty Conference 181.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 51247 Document Control Solutions, Inc. 2,108.00 Software Support 51248 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 8,137.74 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical& Dependent Care 51249 Employers Group Service Corp. 4,320.00 Supervisor&Management On-Site Training 51250 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 51251 Franchise Tax Board 239.68 Wage Garnishment 51252 Health Science Associates 900.00 Professional Services-Asbestos Study 51253 Deirdre E. Hunter 107.74 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51254 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 51255 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng. AFL-CIO Local 501 3,271.29 Dues Deduction 51256 IPMP Institute for Participatory Mgmt. 525.00 Communications Training Registration 51257 John's Philly Grille 113.30 Meeting Expense-CIP Strategic Planning 51258 League Of California Cities 395.14 General Management Meeting Registration 51259 Lucci's 130.50 Meeting Expense 51260 Mellon Trust 19,935.06 Investment Custodian Bank 51261 Mettler-Toledo 445.00 Software Support 51262 Midway Mfg. &Machining Co. 690.00 Pump Repairs, Parts & Refurbishment 51263 Moody's Investor's Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 51264 Municipal Equipment Maintance Assn. 50.00 Membership 51265 National Bond&Trust 1,795.94 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 51266 City of Newport Beach 190.55 Water Use 51267 Nextel Communications 3,368.53 Cellular Phones&Air Time 51268 Nextteq 825.00 Pumps 51269 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 300.56 Plumbing Supplies 51270 OCEA 524.61 Dues Deduction 51271 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 51272 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 51273 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,440.00 Dues Deduction 51274 Project Management Institute 154.00 Membership Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51275 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,484.60 Employee Life Ins. Premium, Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ins. Payroll Deductions 51276 James W. Silva 110.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51277 SkillPath On-Site 5,100.00 On-Site Training 51278 SkillPath Seminars 299.00 Information Technology Training Registration 51279 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 51280 Southern California Water 63.67 Water Use 51281 State Board of Equalization 322.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 51282 State Street Bank and Trust Co. of Ca. 5,991.03 COP Trustee Services 51283 Summit Steel 98.46 Metal 51284 The Training Clinic 3,825.55 On-Site Training 51285 The Unisource Corporation 7,785.88 Stationery&Office Supplies 51286 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 51287 Verizon California 818.75 Telephone Services 51288 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment 51289 Xerox Corporation 161.63 Fax Leases 51290 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 75.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 51291 Philip F. Cordova 250.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51292 Steven M.Thornburg 250.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51293 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 705.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 51294 Medellin, Dave 1,449.76 Employee Computer Loan Program 51295 Ortega, Robert& Micro Center 871.81 Employee Computer Loan Program 51296 Santa Ana Plating 42.98 Reconciliation User Fee Program 51297 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 81,161.66 Professional Services J-73-2 51298 Brown and Caldwell 251,791.90 Engineering Services P1-37, 2-41, O& M Manual and SOP Development 51299 Carollo Engineers 852,053.49 Professional Services J-25-4, P2-66&SP-90 51300 CH2M Hill 86,478.20 Professional Services J-40-7 51301 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. 54,512.88 (2)4-Inch Portable Self-Priming Pumps 51302 Hill Brothers 48,420.41 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control- Newport Trunkline 51303 IPMC c/o Parsons 488,002.00 Professional Services- Program/Project Management 51304 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 42,222.08 Medical Insurance Premium 51305 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 229,781.60 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 51306 Kforce Professional Staffing 37,256.52 Temporary Employment Services 51307 Lee & Ro, Inc. 77,772.73 Professional Services P2-47-3, 5-49, 5-50, 5-51 &5-52 51308 Malcolm Pimle, Inc. 119,229.59 Professional Services 1-10 51309 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 246,438.12 Engineering Services J-42 51310 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 81,095.07 Sodium Hypochlorite 51311 Pixelpushers, Inc. 135,985.50 Internet Site Redesign, On-Line Technical Spec. &Scope of Work Library 51312 Science Applications Intl. Corp. 32,397.99 Ocean Monitoring, Meter Mooring, Science Applications for Water Quality 51313 Synagro Technologies, Inc. 301,866.91 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 51314 Teksystems 27,639.00 Temporary Employment Services 51315 U.S. Peroxide 37,895.63 Hydrogen Peroxide 51316 Waste Markets Corp. 26,319.75 Maint. Agreement- Grit& Screenings Removal& Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal 51317 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 42,225.56 Engineering Service J-67 51318 Green Giant Landscape, Inc. 51,873.00 Construction- Landscaping& Irrigation at Pit.2 51319 J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. 292,336.63 Construction J-35-1 51320 Ken Thompson, Inc. 34,600.00 Construction 5-46 51321 Margate Construction, Inc. 1,956,084.00 Construction P1-37 51322 Oved Dagan Construction Co. 255,194.86 Construction J-90 Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT A �' Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51323 Southern Contracting Company 126,102.00 Construction J-33-1 51324 Orange County Sanitation District 34,051.10 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 51325 A-Plus Systems 1,570.00 Notices & Ads 51326 ABEL Pumps Corp. 876.22 Pump Supplies 51327 Acra Machinery, Inc. 477.00 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51328 Great American Printing Co. 212.72 Printing 51329 Air Liquide America Corp. 1,078.48 Specialty Gases 51330 Airborne Express 42.01 Air Freight 51331 Airgas -West 305.29 Lab Supplies 51332 Airgas Safety 9,554.01 Safety Supplies 51333 Allied Packing & Rubber, Inc. 769.85 Mechanical Supplies 51334 American Red Cross 648.00 CPR Classes& Misc. Supplies 51335 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 124.00 Lab Parts & Supplies 51336 Appleone Employment Service 8,654.05 Temporary Employment Services 51337 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs, Inc. 1,070.00 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing 51338 Arch Wireless 2,057.45 Pagers, Service & Airtime 51339 AssurX, Inc. 4,445.00 CATW EB Server& Software and Technical Support 51340 Awards & Trophies Company 41.38 Plaques 51341 ABB Automation, Inc. 1,005.24 Instrument Repairs 51342 AKM Consulting Engineers 2,790.24 Professional Services 7-36 51343 ASSE American Soc. of Safety Engineers 2,139.00 Meeting Registration & Membership 51344 AT&T Wireless Services 2,935.12 Wireless Phone Services 51345 AW SI 206.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 51346 Baker Tanks 5,762.89 Tank Rentals 51347 Ballantyne, Inc. 20,358.00 Temporary Employment Services 51348 Basic Chemical Solutions 8,632.95 Sodium Bisulfite 51349 Battery Specialties 490.59 Batteries 51350 BioMerieux Vitek, Inc. 1,693.20 Lab Parts & Supplies 51351 Borthwick, Guy, Bettenhausen 1,616.10 Professional Services P2-84 51352 Boyle Engineering Corporation 10,028.22 Engineering Services 1-2-4 51353 Bush & Associates, Inc. 1,360.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 51354 C-Temp, Inc. 399.51 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51355 Southern California Marine Institute 3,950.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 51356 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 51357 Martin Boyer Co., Inc. c/o Cambridge Int. 2,083.33 Prof. Services - Workers' Compensation Claims 51358 Cardlock Fuels 749.51 Fuel Services 51359 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 2,084.42 Professional Services -SP-74 51360 Center for Creative Growth 2,000.00 Professional Services -O & M Management Coaching 51361 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 14,750.00 Professional Services - Safety& Emerg. Resp. Plan Revisions & Electrical Safety 51362 Communications Supply Corp. 2,229.16 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51363 Compressor Components Of California 5,301.30 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51364 Computational Systems, Inc. 3,726.76 Instrument Parts & Supplies 51365 Con-Way Western Express 338.80 Freight 51366 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 4,839.05 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51367 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 958.49 Plumbing Supplies 51368 Cooper Energy Services 154.68 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51369 Corporate Express 232.64 Office Supplies 51370 County of Orange - Auditor Controller 1,094.07 Maint. Agreement- Repair/Install Base, Handheld & Vehicle Radios Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51371 County of Orange, Auditor Controller 770.50 UST Surcharge, UST PR, Haz. Mat-O.C. Fire Auth. &State Surcharge Base Chg. 51372 County Wholesale Electric Co. 21.97 Electrical Parts& Supplies 51373 CASA 325.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 51374 CH2MHill 8,710.54 Engineering Services J-87 51375 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 18,153.72 Cationic Polymer 51376 CMAA 144.00 Publication (Const. Mgmt. Assoc. of America) 51377 CW EA 204.00 O& M Training Registration-California Water Environment Association 51378 CW EA 2002 Annual Conference 4,335.00 O& M Training Registration -California Water Environment Association 51379 CWEA Membership 460.00 Membership-Calif. Water Environment Assoc. 51380 Daniel Company, L.L.C. 2,503.87 Mechanical Parts &Supplies 51381 Dapper Tire Co. 1,660.21 Truck Tires 51382 Del Mar Analytical 2,064.00 Analysis of Wastewater& Biosolids 51383 Dell Direct Sales, L.P. 1,817.74 (1) Dell Latitude Notebook 51384 Delta Packaging Products, Inc. 136.54 Lab Parts&Supplies 51385 DigiTerra 9,428.13 Client Access Software License- IBM AS400 51386 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 518.52 Paint Supplies 51387 DLT Solutions, Inc. 4,787.55 Software- Map Subscription&Series 51388 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 15.84 Electrical Supplies 51389 Edwin M. Perkins 9,026.06 Professional Services-Water Quality Compliance 51390 Enchanter, Inc. 3,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 51391 Environmental&Occupational Risk Mgmt 2,903.25 Professional Services- Comprehensive Noise Survey at Pits. 1 &2 51392 Environmental Resource Association 1,586.15 Lab Parts&Supplies 51393 Excel Door&Gate Company, Inc. 1,573.00 Maintenance& Repair Services 51394 Emedco 481.05 Identification Signs 51395 ENRG 5,492.30 Maintenance- Pit. 1 Compressed Natural Gas Station 51396 ENS Resources, Inc. 15,059.69 Professional Services- Legislative Advocate 51397 FedEx Corporation 97.23 Air Freight 51398 Filterline Corporation 152.07 Filters 51399 First American Real Estate Solutions 221.00 Orange County Property Information 51400 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 7,593.31 Lab Parts&Supplies 51401 Flo-Systems, Inc. 707.23 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51402 Foodcraft Coffee& Refreshment Services 529.11 Meeting Supplies 51403 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 21,123.94 Long-Term& Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium 51404 Foss Environmental 3,889.00 Professional Services- Sludge Transfer 51405 Fountain Valley Camera 29.41 Photo Supplies 51406 Franklin Covey 504.57 Office Supplies 51407 Fry's Electronics 587.77 Computer Supplies 51408 Garig Equipment&Maintenance 2,055.45 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51409 Garratt-Callahan Company 2,358.65 Chemicals 51410 Gates Fiberglass Installers 4,524.00 Fiberglass Repair to Scrubbers H & 1 51411 Global Environmental Network, Inc. 2,512.50 Traffic Control Safety Training 51412 WW Grainger, Inc. 2,866.38 Electrical Parts, Supplies& Locks 51413 Grating Pacific, Inc. 2,555.83 Fiberglass Grating 51414 Graybar 3,670.51 Enclosure& Panel 51415 Graybar 5,077.65 Light Crimp Plus Connector for Fiber Cable 51416 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 53.01 Janitorial Supplies 51417 Hach Company 1,621.73 Lab Parts&Supplies 51418 Harbour Engineering Group 19,269.89 Pump Supplies Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT A `' Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51419 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 2,455.93 Flow Meter, Parts&Supplies 51420 Herb's Blackforest Bakery& Deli 47.25 Meeting Expenses 51421 Hilti, Inc. 2,483.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51422 Home Depot 911.09 Misc. Repair& Maintenance Material 51423 Hopkins Technical Products 729.21 Pump Supplies 51424 Howard Ridley Company 5,043.60 Construction - Repair Water Leaks in Metering Vaults 51425 Hub Auto Supply 428.72 Vehicle Parts& Supplies 51426 Industrial Distribution Group 1,093.05 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51427 Industrial Networking Solutions 1,000.24 Electrical Parts& Supplies 51428 Information Resources 255.00 Human Resources Service- Background Checks 51429 IBM 189.00 AS400 Maintenance 51430 Intratek Computer, Inc. 1,740.00 Network& Server Maintenance 51431 Ionics Instrument Business Group 775.73 Lab Parts&Supplies 51432 Iron Mountain 156.53 Bid Document Storage Fees J-39 51433 Irvine Pipe&Supply 431.74 Iron 51434 Irvine Technology Corporation 14,280.00 Temporary Employment Services 51435 ISA 87.00 Membership-Instrument Society of America 51436 J.G. Tucker and Son, Inc. 2,989.95 Instrument Parts&Supplies 51437 J. L. Wingert Company 2,758.40 Electrical Supplies 51438 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 13,751.02 Install Gas Flaps, Excavate& Expose Interplant Digester Gas 51439 Jay's Catering 1,336.62 Meeting Expenses 51440 Jim's Suspension Service 45.00 Automotive Parts&Supplies 51441 Johnson&Associates, L.L.C. 1,045.00 Professional Services- Pay Range Analysis 51442 Johnstone Supply 3,264.79 Air Conditioner& Electrical Supplies 51443 JWC Environmental 9,897.92 Rebuild (1) Muffin Monster Assembly 51444 Keith Boger 910.00 O& M Training Registration 51445 Kelly Paper 101.48 Paper 51446 Knowledge Key Associates, Inc. 4,495.00 Information Technology Training Registration 51447 KL&P Marketing 1,433.31 Safety Incentive Items 51448 KW Communications Consulting 975.00 Community Outreach Re Bushard Trunkline Replacement Project 51449 Lab Support 3,963.25 Temporary Employment Services 51450 Law/Crandall 4,531.61 Geotechnical Services 3-25 51451 Lucci's 185.98 Meeting Expense 51452 Luedtke Crane Systems, L.L.C. 562.54 Crane Repairs-V-420 51453 LINJER 9,074.89 Professional Service- DART MO 9-2-2-99 51454 M. J. Schiff&Associates, Inc. 7,641.50 Professional Services- Corrosion Study&Interplant Gas Line Leak 51455 MarVac Electronics 22.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies 51456 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 1,261.58 Executive Disability Plan Premium 51457 Matrix Industries, Inc. 1,750.00 Professional Services- Remove & Dispose of Damaged Drywall in Operations Center 51458 Mc Junkin Corp--Ontario Branch 698.22 Plumbing Supplies 51459 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 4,960.73 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51460 Measurement Control Systems, Inc. 3,390.50 Mechanical Parts, Supplies& Repairs 51461 Mec Analytical System 9,370.00 Toxicity Analysis 51462 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 1,768.18 Mechanical Seal Repairs 51463 Media Clips, Inc. 84.19 Notices&Ads 51464 Medlin Controls Co. 118.57 Instrument Supplies 51465 Midway Mfg& Machining Co. 23,304.17 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51466 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 42.31 Janitorial Supplies Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51467 Mission Uniform Service 4,083.06 Uniform Rentals 51468 ModernAir BB & M Air Conditioning, Inc. 7,088.00 Air Conditioner 51469 Motorola Communications & Electronics 12,684.59 Communication Equipment 51470 MDS Consulting 22,183.20 Prof. Services - Surveying Various Capital Projects 51471 National Fire Protection Association 135.00 Membership 51472 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 3,500.00 High Voltage Electrical Safety Training 51473 Neal Supply Co. 124.55 Plumbing Supplies 51474 NetVersant of Southern California 17,658.77 Human Resources Security System Improvements 51475 Ninyo & Moore Corporate Accounting 394.23 Professional Services - Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 51476 O.C. Business Journal 58.00 Subscription 51477 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,019.64 Office Supplies 51478 Olympic Creations 1,573.47 Printing Service - OCSD Logo Pin 51479 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 100.89 Janitorial Supplies 51480 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 5.41 Freight 51481 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 1,586.56 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51482 Oxygen Service Company 395.96 Specialty Gases 51483 OCB Reprographics 832.89 Printing Service - MO 1/26/00 51484 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 513.97 Electrical Supplies 51485 Pace Analytic Services 250.00 High Resolution Analysis of Effluent& Biosolids 51486 Pacific Bell 34.77 Telephone Services 51487 Pacific Bell Internet Services 333.79 Internet Service 51488 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,428.78 Plumbing Supplies 51489 Pacific Parts & Controls 771.60 Instrument Repairs 51490 Palo Alto Design, Inc. 7,495.00 Publication - Executive Summary Report- Shoreline Investigation Phase III 51491 Parsons Infrastructure & Tech. Group 14,395.79 Professional Services - Asset Management Program 51492 Partners Consulting Services 6,900.00 FIS On-Site Support- One World XE Migration Project 51493 Parts Unlimited 274.47 Automotive Supplies 51494 Pool Supply of Orange County 560.30 Pump 51495 Power Design 9,499.40 Computer- (1) Toshiba 1400 SE 51496 Power Bros. Machine, Inc. 858.26 Mechanical Parts, Supplies & Repairs 51497 Projects Partners 11,932.28 Temporary Employment Services 51498 Public Resources Advisory Group 9,598.76 Financial Advisory Services 51499 Pump Engineering 17,229.67 Pumps 51500 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service 51501 Pump Engineering &/or QAir California 178.86 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51502 Quality Tool& Equipment, Inc. 4,089.05 (1) Tire Changer 51503 R.F. MacDonald Co. 6,550.00 Repairs & Maintenance Service - Boiler No. 1 51504 RemedyTemp, Inc. 5,363.15 Temporary Employment Services 51505 Richard Hawk & Company 4,000.00 Supervisor Safety Seminar 51506 Royce Multimedia, Inc. 83.51 Video Service 51507 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 389.47 Pump Supplies 51508 RBF Engineers 14,918.41 Engineering Services 2-24-1 51509 RPM Electric Motors 1,969.73 Electric Motor 51510 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 106.74 Paint Supplies 51511 Safety-Kleen 494.30 Parts Cleaning Service & Equipment Lease 51512 Sehi Computer Products, Inc. 1,736.66 Software/Hardware 51513 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 187.45 Heavy Duty Hand Cleaner 51514 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 12.81 Mechanical Parts & Supplies Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT A " Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51515 SkillPath On-Site 5,100.00 On-Site Training 51516 Smith-Emery Company 822.00 Soil Testing MO 7-13-94 51517 So. Cal. Gas Company 13,220.76 Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel 51518 SoftChoice 9,696.43 Software 51519 Southern California Edison 8,187.97 Power 51520 Southwest Concrete 380.14 Concrete 51521 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 477.38 Stationery& Office Supplies 51522 Strategic Diagnostics, Inc. 994.11 Lab Parts & Supplies 51523 Summit Steel 492.99 Metal 51524 Sunset Industrial Parts 260.71 Mechanical Supplies 51525 Symcas-TSG 1,384.18 SCADA System VAX Maintenance Agreement 51526 SPX Valves & Control 4,960.69 Valves & Plumbing Supplies 51527 Taylor-Dunn 895.36 Electric Cart Parts 51528 Thermo Environmental Instruments 120.74 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51529 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4,781.49 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51530 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,584.00 Elevator Maintenance 51531 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 51532 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 180.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 51533 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. 249.08 Automotive Supplies 51534 US Filter Corporation 1,159.00 Service Agreement- Lab Purification System 51535 U.S. Composting Council 500.00 Membership 51536 Ultra Scientific 69.16 Lab Parts & Supplies 51537 Undersea Graphics, Inc. 4,500.00 Contract Service -Outfall Inspection 51538 The Unisource Corporation 806.53 Office Supplies 51539 United Parcel Service 51.50 Parcel Services 51540 Defense Finance and Accounting 4,285.20 Professional Services J-85 - Naval Post Graduate School 51541 Board of Regents 975.00 O & M Training Registration 51542 US Filter Westates Carbon 4,244.44 Carbon Filters 51543 Vallen Safety Supply Company 1,236.25 Safety Supplies 51544 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 23,572.00 Temporary Employment Service 51545 Vapex, Inc. 2,631.56 Instrument Parts & Supplies 51546 Varian, Inc. 141.37 Lab Parts & Supplies 51547 Varian Associates, Inc. 4,798.92 Lab Instrument Maintenance 51548 Verizon California 27.43 Telephone Services 51549 Village Nurseries 41.38 Landscaping Supplies 51550 VW R Scientific Products Corporation 3,082.16 Lab Parts & Supplies 51551 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,284.80 Security Guards 51552 Water Environment Federation 124.75 Publication 51553 W axie Sanitary Supply 654.24 Janitorial Supplies 51554 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 2,798.78 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51555 Wilson Supply, Inc. 1,549.45 Instrument Parts & Supplies 51556 W EF Publications 49.98 Publication 51557 Xerox Corporation 11,700.57 Copier Leases 51558 Zee Medical 724.51 First Aid Supplies 51559 3CMA 50.00 Notices & Ads 51560 Atlas-Allied, Inc. 18,323.10 Construction - Natural Gas Line Replacement at Plant 1 51561 California Bank & Trust 14,012.00 Construction J-33-1A, Retention 51562 J W Contracting Corporation 21,659.00 Construction P2-60 Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51563 Union Bank of California 8,629.00 Construction P2.60, Retention 51564 Shabbir S. Basrai 1,200.87 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51565 Bradley H. Cagle 419.58 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51566 Chandra R. Johannesson 317.07 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51567 Julie A. Matsumoto 403.04 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51568 David Rodriguez 135.45 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51569 Douglas M. Stewart 478.09 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51570 Daniel R. Tremblay 176.11 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51571 Ken H. Wong 537.09 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51572 Beach, James 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51573 Campos, Frank 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51574 Edwards, Sean 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51575 Flippen, Barbara 165.69 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51576 Foo, See-Khoon 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51577 Hack, James 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51578 K & K, Inc. 3,402.49 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51579 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fees 51580 Mattoon, Shirley 160.33 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51581 Neill, W illiam 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51582 Oldfield, David G or Roberta 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51583 Orange County Cemetery District 117.98 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51584 Orange County Sanitation District 932.09 Petty Cash Reimb. 51585 Seeley, Tony 165.69 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51586 Shultz, Douglas or L. Triner 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51587 Starks, Dorothy 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51588 William Bouseman 82.04 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51589 CMTA 2003 Conference 235.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable - Warrants $ 8,085,413.05 Payroll Disbursements 29264 - 29369 Employee Paychecks $ 153,827.07 Biweekly Payroll 03/05/03 2 937 0 - 29374 Interim Paychecks 16,079.62 Termination, Timesheet Correction, Reissue Returned Direct Deposit & Leave Payout 8 262 5 - 83106 Direct Deposit Statements 839,860.77 Biweekly Payroll 03/05/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,009,767.46 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas, National Association 33,822.44 February Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas, National Association 128,935.06 Societe Generale February Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total W ire Transfer Payments $ 162,757,50 Total Claims Paid 03/01/03 - 03/15/03 $ 9,257,938.01 Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT A ' Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable -Warrants 51590 Ark Construction Company $ 25,000.00 General and Tunnel Cleaning Services at Plts. 1 & 2 51591 Orange County Sanitation District 565,141.80 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 51592 Orange County Water District 251,061.18 GW RS Project J-36 51593 Painewebber Incorporated 38,632.18 COP Remarketing Agreement 51594 Southern California Edison 34,587.75 Power 51595 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 151,063.25 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 51596 Airgas Safety 3,155.94 Safety Supplies & Equipment 51597 American Red Cross 879.50 CPR Training and Misc. Supplies 51598 Aquarian Coatings 670.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 51599 Arnold D. Purisch, Ph.D., Inc. 2,000.00 Medical Screening 51600 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 51601 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 51602 Compressor Components of California 3,264.83 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51603 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 304.00 Plumbing Supplies 51604 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 51605 Electra-Bond, Inc. 7,370.10 Coating for New Auger 51606 Empire Pipe Cleaning & Equipment, Inc. 8,793.32 Sewerline Cleaning - City of Tustin, Unincorporated O.C. & Irvine 51607 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,945.43 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical& Dependent Care 51608 Employers Group 500.00 Supervisor& Management Training 51609 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 51610 Franchise Tax Board 229.01 Wage Garnishment 51611 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 51612 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng. AFL-CIO Local 501 3,253.29 Dues Deduction 51613 Invensys Systems, Inc. 22,845.29 Instrument Supplies 51614 JMH Consulting 3,000.00 On-Site Training - Hiring & Interviewing Workshop 51615 Shirley A. McCracken 577.77 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51616 McGarry Central 90.43 Office Equipment Maintenance Agreement 51617 McMaster-Carr Supply Co, 673.23 Mechanical Parts, Supplies & Tools 51618 Narrow Guage Inn, L.L.C. 272.50 Administration Meeting Registration 51619 National Bond & Trust 2,196.89 U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 51620 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 2,512.71 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 51621 OCEA 515.36 Dues Deduction 51622 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 51623 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 51624 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,467.00 Dues Deduction 51625 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 618.30 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 51626 SkillPath Seminars 179.00 Communications Meeting Registration 51627 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 51628 Snap On Industrial 524.73 Tools 51629 So. Cal. Gas Company 16,143.97 Natural Gas 51630 Southern California Edison 1,900.48 Power 51631 SPX Valves & Control 35.56 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51632 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,181.91 Mechanical Supplies 51633 United States Postal Service 51000.00 Postage 51634 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 51635 Verizon California 1,855.90 Telephone Services 51636 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51637 W EF 170.00 Membership - Water Environment Federation 51638 Xerox Corporation 2,401.43 Copier Leases 51639 Rebecca A. Brooks 150.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51640 Robert P. Ghirelli 896.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51641 Wanda R. Hagerty 103.44 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51642 Vladimir A. Kogan 257.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51643 Yu-Li Tsai 131.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51644 City of Seal Beach 240.00 Permit Fees 3-12-4 51645 United States Postal Service 750.00 Postage 51646 Air Products & Chemicals 25,758.02 O & M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 51647 American Express 52,290.54 Purchasing Card Program, Misc. Supplies & Services 51648 Bell Land Surveying 46,431.25 Professional Surveying Services - Various Capital Projects 51649 Black & Veatch Corporation 475,948.21 Engineering Services P1-46, J-77 & P2-65 51650 Brown and Caldwell 67,963.04 Engineering Services 1-98 51651 City of Fountain Valley 26,632.08 Water Use 51652 Coral Energy Resources, L.P. 64,857.46 Natural Gas 51653 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 27,603.85 Cationic Polymer 51654 Dell Direct Sales, L.P. 34,555.43 (20) Computers & (10) Switches 51655 Empire Pipe Cleaning & Equipment, Inc. 37,175.17 Sewerline Cleaning - City of Tustin, Unincorporated O.C. & Irvin 51656 General Petroleum 37,544.91 Unleaded Gasoline 51657 Graybar 33,112.78 Computer Hardware/Software 51658 IPMC c/o Parsons 464,927.00 Professional Services - Program/Project Management 51659 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 56,229.50 Construction - Drain Pipe, Confined Space Entry Insp., Pedestal 51660 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 202,733.00 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 51661 Program Planning Professionals 94,910.97 Engineering Training - MS Project 2002 51662 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 156,147.18 Sodium Hypochlorite 51663 R Company, Ltd. 48,300.00 Records Management Software 51664 Southern California Edison 58,281.56 Power 51665 Southern Counties Oil Co. 25,154.07 Diesel Fuel 51666 Synagro Technologies, Inc. 279,244.86 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 51667 Systime Computer Corp 89,800.00 Professional Services -J D Edwards One World XE Implement� 51668 SPEC Services, Inc. 25,377.30 Engineering Services J-33-1 51669 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 127,368.29 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 51670 U.S. Peroxide 92,482.94 Hydrogen Peroxide & Ferrous Chloride 51671 Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart 116,815.18 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 51672 Xerox Corporation 25,998.63 Copier Leases 51673 Ken Thompson, Inc. 285,500.00 Construction 5-46 51674 Steve P Rados, Inc. 188,226.90 Construction 1-2-4 51675 i2 Technologies 2,068.15 Software 51676 A-Plus Systems 1,525.00 Notices & Ads 51677 Abatix Environmental Corp. 220.89 Hardware 51678 Great American Printing Co. 1,616.25 Paper 51679 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 142.90 Lab Parts & Supplies 51680 Airborne Express 102.10 Air Freight 51681 Airgas - West 12.80 Lab Supplies 51682 Airgas Safety 2,520.67 Safety Supplies & Equipment 51683 Allied Electronics, Inc. 129.58 Electrical Supplies 51684 American Airlines 5,109.50 Travel Services Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51685 American Red Cross 24.00 CPR Classes & Misc. Supplies 51686 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 452.00 Lab Parts & Supplies 51687 Appleone Employment Service 1,850.88 Temporary Employment Services 51688 Applied Industrial Technology 266.81 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51689 Aquarium Doctor 146.55 Human Resources Aquarium Service 51690 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement- Admin. Bldg. Atrium 51691 Awards & Trophies Company 23.17 Plaques 51692 AGM Electronics, Inc. 301.83 Electronic Supplies 51693 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 592.08 Telephone Service 51694 AT&T Wireless Services 3,023.17 Wireless Phone Services 51695 Battelle 200.00 Lab Training Registration 51696 Battery Specialties 328.64 Batteries 51697 Baudville 46.01 Stationery& Office Supplies 51698 Bentley Systems, Inc. 956.82 Software 51699 Bird-X, Inc. 759.00 Super Pro Electric System 51700 Brooks Instrument Division 288.58 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51701 Cardlock Fuels 926.75 Fueling Services 51702 Carollo Engineers 5,111.27 Professional Services P1-60 & P2-60 51703 Cashco, Inc., c/o Ponton Ind., Inc. 1,099.51 Valves 51704 Ce112CeII 235.24 Inst. Parts & Supplies 51705 City of Anaheim 204.96 Admin. Meeting Expenses 51706 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 19,876.24 Professional Services - Hazardous Energy Control Project 51707 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 5,699.53 Batteries 51708 Conex International 275.00 Professional Services 132-60 51709 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 2,740.20 Electrical Supplies 51710 Corporate Express 10,797.54 Office Supplies 51711 Cost Containment Solutions 2,103.97 Worker's Comp. Services 51712 County of Orange - Auditor Controller 739.49 Maint. Agreement- Repair/Installation of Base, Handheld & Veh 51713 County Wholesale Electric Co. 69.82 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51714 Culligan of Orange County 371.46 Maint.Agreement-Con Gen Water Softener System 51715 Cytec Industries 17,956.80 Anionic Polymer Spec. No. 9798-18 51716 CA Emissions Program 5.40 Vehicle Smog Testing 51717 CAPIO 664.00 Communications Meeting Registration (Calif. Assoc. of Public In 51718 CEPA Company 1,395.00 Certification of Fume Hoods, Bio-Safety Cabinets, Total Exhaus 51719 CPI International 781.87 Lab Supplies 51720 CR&R, Inc. 1,298.00 Container Rentals 51721 CWEA 1,135.00 O & M Training Registration 51722 CW EA 2002 Annual Conference 1,770.00 Compliance Meeting Registration and O & M Training Registrati 51723 David Kirby Company 1,170.00 Remove and Install Linoleum Tiles 51724 David's Tree Service 3,830.00 Tree Maint. Service 51725 Del Mar Analytical 6,859.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 51726 Diamond H Recognition 576.20 Employee Service Awards 51727 DigiPhoto 14.62 Photographic Services 51728 Dionex Corporation 2,291.00 Lab Instrument Repairs 51729 Duthie Power Services 1,060.00 Generator Supplies 51730 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 245.98 Electrical Supplies 51731 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 1,843.00 Medical Screening 51732 Electro-Test, Inc. 2,309.27 Electrical Supplies Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51733 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 1,342.60 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical& Dependent Care 51734 Enchanter, Inc. 4,000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 51735 Environmental & Occupational Risk Mgmt. 1,749.00 Prof. Services - Inspect Wall Cavities at Operations Center Basi 51736 Environmental Engineering & Contracting 5,000.00 Prof. Services - Urban Runoff Triennial Review 51737 Environmental Science Associates 3,138.92 Professional Services J-40-5 51738 Eurotherm Controls 1,664.83 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51739 ENS Resources, Inc. 15,025.08 Professional Services - Legislative Advocate 51740 FedEx Corporation 359.15 Air Freight 51741 First American Real Estate Solutions 474.90 Orange County Property Information 51742 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 13,356.00 Lab Parts & Supplies 51743 Foodcraft Coffee & Refreshment Services 124.60 Meeting Supplies 51744 Forestry Suppliers 349.85 Lab Parts & Supplies 51745 Franklin Covey 274.68 Office Supplies 51746 Fry's Electronics 1,151.75 Computer Supplies 51747 Full Spectrum Analytics 600.00 Lab Instrument Repairs 51748 G. E. Supply 1,391.59 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51749 Gary Goodman 240.50 Consultant Meeting Expense - Coordinated Commercial Enterpr 51750 Gates Fiberglass Installers 723.56 Construction - Install (2) Fiberglass Man Ways at Pelt. 1, Barscr 51751 George Yardley Co. 570.49 Automatic Switch Valves 51752 Gerhardt's, Inc. 3,528.34 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51753 Getinge Castle 117.32 Lab Parts & Supplies 51754 Golden Bell Products 684.00 Contractual Services - Insecticide Coating of Manholes 51755 Golden State Controls 1,847.48 Instrument Parts & Supplies 51756 Goldenwest Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service - Spec. #990015 51757 W W Grainger, Inc. 11,939.28 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51758 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 80.34 Janitorial Supplies 51759 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 413.86 Chemicals 51760 Harold Primrose Ice 55.50 Ice For Samples 51761 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 1,509.21 Plumbing Supplies 51762 Herb's Blackforest Bakery & Deli 71.75 Meeting Expenses 51763 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 1,271.46 Office Chairs 51764 Hill Brothers 14,876.50 Chemicals - Odor& Corrosion Control- Newport Trunkline 51765 Hillman Instrument Company 500.27 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51766 Home Depot 1,221.24 Misc. Repair & Maintenance Material 51767 Hopkins Technical Products 2,021.69 Pump Supplies 51768 Horizon Technology 16,899.22 Lab Instruments & Supplies 51769 House of Batteries 278.54 Batteries 51770 Hub Auto Supply 220.75 Truck Parts 51771 Hydrotex 4,435.15 Lube Oil 51772 HCS Cutler 863.38 Ladders 51773 Idexx 4,008.30 Lab Parts & Supplies 51774 Industrial Distribution Group 449.66 Paint Supplies 51775 Industrial Filter Manufacturers, Inc. 1,857.75 Filters 51776 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 775.21 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51777 Roto Rooter 8,088.06 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 51778 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 936.21 Lab Parts & Supplies 51779 IBM 1,537.04 Maintenance Agreement AS-400 517BU interocean Sysiums Inc. 2,261.58 $a Extended Power Supply Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT B ' Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51781 Interstate Battery Systems 433.31 Batteries 51782 Intratek Computer, Inc. 2,197.80 Network & Server Maintenance 51783 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 310.00 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 51784 Irvine Ranch Water District 66.01 Water Use 51785 Isco, Inc. 575.21 Lab Parts & Supplies 51786 IECOC 50.00 Freight 51787 James F. McConnell 1,625.00 Administration Meeting Expense 51788 Jay's Catering 1,083.51 Meeting Expenses 51789 Thermo Westronics 1,565.76 Instrument Supplies 51790 Johnstone Supply 1,351.95 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51791 JPC Construction 2,480.30 Construction - Install Bird Screen at Plt. 2 Dewatering Bay Area Project 51792 K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. 7,435.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 51793 Kaman Industrial Technologies 778.34 Instrument Supplies 51794 Kelly Paper 736.40 Paper 51795 Kings County Tax Collector 11,171.76 Property Taxes 51796 KL&P Marketing 1,523.63 Safety Incentive Items 51797 L & N Uniform Supply Co. 986.92 OCSD Jackets for Source Control Personnel 51798 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 270.51 Safety Supplies 51799 Lab Support 1,348.75 Temporary Employment Services 51800 Lascomm 7,330.99 Computer Software/Hardware 51801 Lee & Ro, Inc. 20,113.57 Professional Services J-71-7 51802 Lifecom-Safety, Inc. 200.00 Repair& Calibrate Odor Control Equipment 51803 Lucci's 93.75 Meeting Expense 51804 LINJER 4,507.97 Professional Service - DART MO 9-22-99 51805 Management Technologies 31900.00 Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit 51806 Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, L.L.P. 5,000.00 Strategic Planning & Advocacy 51807 Denise M. Martinez 970.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51808 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 80.48 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51809 McRay Industries, Inc. 5,417.18 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51810 Measurement Control Systems, Inc, 3,284.22 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51811 Mec Analytical System 24,362.00 Toxicity Analysis 51812 Medlin Controls Co. 2,538.44 Instrument Supplies 51813 Mid-West Associates 3,632.26 Pump Supplies 51814 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 9,233.87 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51815 Mission Uniform Service 4,082.69 Uniform Rentals 51816 Morton Salt 600.07 Salt 51817 Mountain Valley Express Co., Inc, 422.07 Freight 51818 MBC Applied Environmental Sciences 1,420.00 Lab Analysis - Benthic Infaunal Sample 51819 M DS Consulting 7,924.80 Prof.Services - Surveying Various Capital Projects 51820 National Safety Council 495.18 On-Site Training - Defensive Driving 51821 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 4,294.95 O & M and Human Resources Training Registration 51822 Neal Supply Co. 1,347.25 Plumbing Supplies 51823 Newark Electronics 1,086.04 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51824 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 2,292.61 Oil 51825 Ninyo & Moore Corporate Accounting 84.66 Professional Services P1-37 51826 The Norco Companies 170.78 Mail Delivery Service 51827 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 26.75 Steel Tags 51828 NPELRA Annual Training Conference 1,125.00 Human Resources Training Registration Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51829 NRG Energy, Inc. 2,170.30 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51830 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,493.97 Office Supplies 51831 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,184.97 Janitorial Supplies 51832 Orange County Vector Control District 6,403.83 Pest Control 51833 Oxygen Service Company 2,914.08 Specialty Gases 51834 OI Analytical 440.10 Lab Parts & Supplies 51835 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 1,281.23 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51836 Pacific Bell 1,268.13 Telephone Services 51837 Pacific Bell/W orldCom 5.40 Telephone Service 51838 Pacific Mechanical Supply 840.17 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 51839 Parker Hannifin Corporation 404.16 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51840 Parker Supply Company 8,980.40 Mechanical Seals & Misc. Supplies 51841 Partners Consulting Services 11,580.00 FIS On-Site Support - One World XE Migration Project 51842 Parts Unlimited 53.69 Automotive Supplies 51843 Paulus Engineering, Inc. 12,455.00 Construction - Roadway Repairs at Arroyo & Skyline Drive 51844 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 2,454.80 Lab Parts & Supplies 51845 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 493.35 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 51846 Projects Partners 16,901.31 Temporary Employment Services 51847 Protech Petroleum Services, Inc. 20,380.00 Testing & Certification of Underground Storage Tanks 51848 Pump Engineering 2,328.79 Pump Supplies 51849 PAPA 110.00 O & M Training Registration 51850 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service 51851 PSB Industries 1,553.40 Electrical Supplies 51852 R. L. Abbott & Associates 6,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 51853 Regents of Univ. of California 10,503.85 Professional Services J-85 51854 Reliastar 9,334.30 Employee Medical Health Premium 51855 Robert J. Lung & Assoc. 9,596.56 Prof. Services -Aerial Photos of Plants 1 & 2 51856 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 195.42 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 51857 RBF Consulting 3,450.21 Professional Services - Roof for College Pump Sta. Pump Pedestal 51858 RM Controls 152.73 Charts 51859 RPM Electric Motors 1,562.91 Motor Repairs 51860 RS Hughes Co., Inc. 58.89 Paint Supplies 51861 S & J Supply Co., Inc. 1,695.99 Pump Supplies 51862 Schwing America, Inc. 3,328.98 Pump Supplies 51863 Schwing America, Inc. 1,950.00 O & M Training Registration 51864 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 3,896.19 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 51865 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 138.97 Water Use 51866 Sehi Computer Products, Inc. 1,853.76 Computer Hardware/Software 51867 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 237.74 Building and Construction Material 51868 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 1,292.39 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51869 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 5,738.45 Lab Parts & Supplies 51870 Smith-Emery Company 753.50 Materials Testing, Inspection & Geotechnical Engineering for Capital Projects 51871 Snap On Industrial 145.33 Tools 51872 SoftChoice 9,249.32 Software 51873 Southern California Edison 28.32 Power 51874 Sparkletts 1,358.78 Drinking W ater/Cooler Rentals 51875 Strata International, Inc. 505.46 Bacterial Treatment& Aeration of Wet Well at Michelson 51876 Summit Steel 1,048.59 Metal Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51877 Sunset Industrial Parts 2,712.27 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51878 SARBS-CW EA 40.00 O & M Training Registration 51879 SPX Valves & Controls 874.43 Valves 51880 Taylor-Dunn 2,323.38 Electric Cart Parts 51881 Terminix International Co. 4,140.00 Pest Control 51882 The Lewis Group 6,825.31 Consulting Service- Capital Project Management Process 51883 The Orange County Register 3,789.12 Notices & Ads 51884 Thermo Electron Spectroscopy 97.52 Lab Parts & Supplies 51885 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,980.53 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51886 Thyssen Krupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 51887 Daily Pilot 100.00 Notices & Ads 51888 Tran Consulting Engineers 1,442.00 Professional Services - Fiber Optic Cabling Extension Pit. 2 51889 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 14,708.18 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 51890 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. 19.80 Automotive Supplies 51891 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 2,002.00 Lab Services 51892 Two Wheels One Planet 1,999.84 (6) Bikes 51893 U.S. Metro Group, Inc. 24,785.00 Janitorial & Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 & 2 51894 Ultra Scientific 564.12 Lab Parts & Supplies 51895 The Unisource Corporation 180.97 Stationery& Office Supplies 51896 United Parcel Service 890.99 Parcel Services 51897 US Equipment Co., Inc. 2,644.40 Coolant 51898 US Filter Westates Carbon 2,398.54 Filters 51899 Varian, Inc. 15.31 Lab Parts & Supplies 51900 Verizon California 960.35 Telephone Services 51901 Verne's Plumbing 175.00 Service Contract-Testing & Cert. Backflow Devices at Pits. 1 & 2 & Pump Sta. 51902 Vision Service Plan 8,823.72 Vision Service Premium 51903 Vortex Industries, Inc. 1,979.90 Door Repair 51904 VW R Scientific Products Corporation 6,428.11 Lab Parts & Supplies 51905 The Wackenhut Corporation 18,835.36 Security Guards 51 906 W axie Sanitary Supply 71.70 Janitorial Supplies 51 907 Western States Controls c/o GM Cooke 592.62 Instrument Supplies 51908 Western Wholesale 484.10 Leaf Blowers 51909 W EF 974.00 Membership - Water Environment Federation 51910 Xerox Corp. 995.00 Administrative Services On-Site Xerox Training 51911 Yokogawa Corp. of America 386.98 Chart Paper 51912 Atlas-Allied, Inc. 20,524.60 Construction - Natural Gas Line Replacement at Pit. 1 51913 Union Bank of California 20,914.10 Construction 1-2-4, Retention 51914 Laurie S. Bluestein 1,275.46 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51915 Patrick B. Carnahan 642.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51916 David M. Chafe 981.81 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51917 Kimberly C. Christensen 1,625.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51918 James M. Elo 428.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51919 Daniel R. Miranda 713.35 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51920 Peter M. Morrison 752.52 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 51921 Samuel L. Mowbray 168.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51922 Wendy T. Sevenandt 942.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51923 Robert J. Taylor 2,164.41 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51924 Donald B. Van Voorst 720.55 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51925 CVWMA 75.00 Compliance Meeting Registration (Central Valley Wastewater Mgrs.Assoc.) 51926 Orange County Sanitation District 1,093.48 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,190,520.72 Payroll Disbursements 29375 -29508 Employee Paychecks $ 175,184.16 Biweekly Payroll 03/19/03 29613 -29615 Interim Paycheck $ 10,817.31 Termination Paycheck 83107 - 83589 Direct Deposit Statements 854,183.83 Biweekly Payroll 03/19/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,040,185.30 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank &Trust 19,023.09 March Interest Payment on Series 2000 A& B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 19,023.09 Total Claims Paid 03/16/03-03/31/03 $ 6,249,729.11 Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT B `` BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. SUMMARY See attached listing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 04/01/03 — 04/15/03 and 04/16/03— 04/30/03 ! r fi Claims Paid From 04/01/03 to 04/15/03 Vendor# Vendor# Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 16168 16168 51927 Orange County Sanitation District $ 543,437.94 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 33283 33283 51928 Southern California Edison 70,152.24 Power 11711 121857 51929 Filter Supply Company 69.77 Panels for Cen Gen Engine Air Filters 40432 106745 51930 Airgas Safety 3,071.77 Safety Supplies&Equipment 11391 11391 51931 American Airlines 3,834.00 Travel Services 66747 66747 51932 American Training Resources,Inc. 1,070.67 Safety Video 78060 78060 51933 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 32.85 Telephone Service 77745 9849 51934 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,456.00 Cellular Telephone Service 34649 34649 51935 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 87185 87185 51936 City of Yorba Linda 125.00 Meeting Expenses-Contract 2-41 7173 7173 51937 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 30971 30971 51938 Compressor Components Of California 6,170.19 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 12095 12095 51939 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 593.00 Plumbing Supplies 121401 121401 51940 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 36847 36847 51941 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 630.00 O&M Training Registration-California Water Environment Association 115238 115238 51942 Driver Alliant Insurance Service, Inc. 3,618.00 Crime Insurance Renewal 11455 11455 51943 Electra-Bond, Inc. 1,959.98 Epoxy Coating of Mechanical Parts 106809 106809 51944 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,945.43 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 79214 79214 51945 Employers Group 20.00 On-Site Training-Performance Review 81904 81904 51946 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 12087 12087 51947 City of Fullerton 78.39 Water Use 112256 112256 51948 Hasler, Inc. 237.74 Meter Rental Charges&Misc.Supplies-Intellitouch System Complete Mail System 52329 52329 51949 City of Huntington Beach 15,526.52 Water Use 70877 70877 51950 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 7270 7270 51951 Intl.Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,253.29 Dues Deduction 109840 109840 51952 Kent Automotive 349.24 Automotive Parts&Supplies 35668 31077 51953 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,287.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 4058 4058 51954 Michael D.Moore 102.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 116599 116599 51955 National Bond&Trust 2,196.89 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 121312 121312 51956 National Instruments 488.38 Instrument Repairs 65891 65891 51957 NetManage,Inc. 1,880.49 Software Support&Service 69649 72451 51958 Nextel Communications 3,418.10 Cellular Phones&Air Time 33486 33486 51959 OCEA 524.61 Dues Deduction 10081 10081 51960 Pacific Bell 18.75 Telephone Services 64274 77083 51961 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 37241 37241 51962 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 33515 33515 51963 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 7229 7229 51964 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,476.00 Dues Deduction 80303 80303 51965 Projects Partners 4,058.35 Temporary Employment Services 122227 122227 51966 Richard Hawk&Company 4,000.00 Supervisor Safety Training 63706 63706 51967 Self-Insurance Plans 1,146.69 State Workers'Compensation User Funding&Assessment 42681 12407 51968 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 784.62 Name Plates&Mechanical Supplies 97738 97738 51969 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 12722 12722 51970 Summit Steel 347.85 Metal 12790 12790 51971 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,019.28 Mechanical Supplies 122585 122585 51972 TRC-Alton Geoscience 4,523.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 62826 62826 51973 U.S Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/03 to 04/15/03 Vendor# Vendor# Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 33460 33460 51974 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 10065 10065 51975 Verizon California 759.10 Telephone Services 120601 120601 51976 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment 13291 13291 51977 Xerox Corporation 2,699.78 Copier Leases 8002 8002 51978 Michael A. Berdis 462.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 116741 116741 51979 Michael J.Boess 520.47 Meeting/T rain Ing Expense Reimbursement 7894 7894 51980 Patrick B.Carnahan 650.05 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8184 8184 51981 Leandre P.Catacutan 143.84 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8651 8651 51982 Frank Chavez 538.17 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8109 8109 51983 Ronald C.Cortez 553.97 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 2014 2014 51984 Victor M. Ferguson 118.08 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 4058 4058 51985 Michael D.Moore 238.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 107545 107545 51986 Enrique Pantoja 453.90 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 3542 3542 51987 William F. Pierce 1,021.66 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 4076 4076 51988 George L. Robertson 610.79 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8230 8230 51989 Michael I.Zedek 452.23 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 122526 122526 51990 Brintle,Brian K.or Jeannie 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 122542 122542 51991 Cox,Barbara 926.16 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 122518 122518 51992 Fort,Dianne 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 122551 122551 51993 Heesch,James 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 122606 122606 51994 Key,Jeffrey L.&NexCom Computer 1,365.41 Employee Computer Loan Program 122500 122500 51995 Manning,William 6,121.89 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 122534 122534 51996 Sausser, Duane L. 160.33 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 122593 122593 51997 Stephens,John 1,793.51 Employee Computer Loan Program 38501 11261 51998 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 65,466.67 Professional Services J-73-2 97893 97893 51999 Basic Chemical Solutions 109,124.30 Sodium Bisulfite 11623 11623 52000 Black&Veatch Corporation 50,735.10 Engineering Services P1-76&P2-85 78537 78537 52001 Blue Cross of California 267,270.30 Medical Insurance Premium 63423 13362 52002 Brown&Caldwell 41,178.03 Engineering Services P1-37 82843 82843 52003 Carollo Engineers 225,818.51 Prof.Svrs.J-39,Microfiltration Demonstration Project&Disinfection Investigation 15296 15296 52004 Delta Dental 50,757.88 Dental Insurance Plan 87177 87177 52005 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 57,500.00 Prf.Svrs.-FOG Study&Ind.Wastewater Treatment Oper.Program Training 97375 97375 52006 J.F.Shea Construction, Inc. 1,624,588.17 Construction J-35-2 33013 33013 52007 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 42,059.80 Medical Insurance Premium 13645 13645 52008 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 187,420.44 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 63183 63183 52009 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 47,165.06 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 119984 119984 52010 Malcolm Pirnie,Inc. 75,954.44 Professional Services 1-10 115650 115650 52011 Manuel Bros.,Inc. 51,376.00 Construction-Fiber Optics Extension at Plant 2 15288 15288 52012 Margate Construction, Inc. 2,633,427.00 Construction Pi-37 69198 69198 52013 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 68,883.75 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 111683 111683 52014 Oved Dagan Construction Co. 161,137.62 Construction J-90 69534 69534 52015 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 106,926.73 Engineering Services J-42 112053 103392 52016 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 260,877.79 Sodium Hypochlorite 42631 14007 52017 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 30,110.22 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 99426 99426 52018 Spectrum Video,Inc. 28,572.92 Engineering Services-Audio Visual Equip.for Conference Rooms A&B 115748 115748 52019 Systime Computer Corp 61,920.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One World XE Implementation 80899 14031 52020 Tule Ranch 135,635.61 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 104475 104475 52021 U.S. Peroxide 27,899.43 Hydrogen Peroxide ti Page 2 of 9 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/03 to 04/15/03 Vendor# Vendor# Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 85008 85016 52022 UC Riverside 74,805.00 Professional Services-Biotrickling Filter Test 86140 86140 52023 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 46,991.87 Engineering Service J-67 12597 79871 52024 Great American Printing Co. 214.78 Stationery&Off Ice Supplies 45639 12360 52025 Air Liquide America Corp. 2,555.81 Specialty Gases 45701 45701 52026 Airborne Express 151.75 Air Freight 11711 121857 52027 Filter Supply Company 1,026.88 Filters 53911 53911 52028 American Red Cross 108.00 CPR Classes&Misc.Supplies 119423 119423 52029 American Seal&Packing 422.08 Injectable Packing Material 75192 75192 52030 Andy's Salvage Pick Up 1,000.00 Construction Services-Material Removal 11463 11463 52031 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 2,850.00 Lab Analyses 9814 9814 52032 Awards&Trophies Company 126.50 Plaques 122403 122403 52033 AACE International 1,590.00 Engineering Training Registration 41785 15923 52034 ABM Business Machines,Inc. 324.05 Paper Drill Repairs 31595 31595 52035 AMSA 695.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 115836 115844 52036 ASI Robicon Go Ponton Industries 9,640.00 3-Day On-Site Training 82860 82860 52037 ASSE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 160.00 Membership 78060 78060 52038 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 121.25 Telephone Service 88022 88022 52039 AT&T Wireless Services 193.88 Wireless Phone Services 68865 68865 52040 AWWA 131.00 Membership 115166 66392 52041 Baker Tanks 2.626.89 Tank Rentals 62455 30787 52042 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 11,001.86 Telephone Equipment Service 10807 10807 52043 Battery Specialties 910.01 Batteries 38560 31368 52044 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 1,140.78 Valves&Value Repair Kits 72725 72725 52045 Bentley Systems, Inc. 4,436.73 Software Maintenance Agreement 13240 13240 52046 BloMerieux Vitek,Inc. 1,029.99 Lab Supplies 12520 12520 52047 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 74.44 Post and Base 13389 13389 52048 BNI Building News 12.00 Publication 32731 32731 52049 California Auto Collision 3,582.08 Vehicle Repairs 11885 11885 52050 California Automatic Gate 290.80 Service Agreement 30648 30648 52051 California Relocation Services, Inc. 67.50 Office Moving Services 49525 49525 52052 Cappo,Inc. 360.00 Membership 69243 69243 52053 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 21,846.92 Engineering Services P2-82&SP-74 111296 111296 52054 Cel12CelI 170.61 Communication Equipment 108370 108370 52055 Center for Creative Growth 2,000.00 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 38050 17144 52056 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 34.30 Lab Supplies 30761 30761 52057 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 9,500.00 Prof.Services-O&M Manuals for Disinfection Facilities 30971 30971 52058 Compressor Components of California 2,496.00 Coil Cleaning&Testing 116556 116556 52059 Conex International 1,665.00 Professional Services P2-60 38359 12044 52060 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3,691.78 Electrical Supplies 97922 97922 52061 Contract Environmental Service 500.00 SCAQMD(Rule 61)Compliance Testing on Gasoline Storage Tanks 61840 12167 52062 Cooper Energy Services 1,052.90 Engine Supplies 39052 12221 52063 Corporate Express 9,132.37 Office Supplies 12255 12255 52064 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 650.04 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 103018 103018 52065 County of Orange(PFRD Geomatics) 244.20 Parcel Maps 39095 17216 52066 County Wholesale Electric Co. 464.39 Electrical Parts&Supplies 36097 32862 52067 CEM Corporation 246.39 Lab Supplies 30824 30824 52068 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. 750.00 Lab Analysis 119239 119239 52069 County Sanitation of LA County Dist.No.70 9,520.00 Olfactometry Lab Expense Page 3 of 9 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/03 to 04/15/03 Vendor# Vendor# Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 35220 35220 52070 CW EA 695.00 Source Control Meeting Registration&Electrical Training Registration 36847 36847 52071 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 385.00 Compliance Training Registration-California Water Environment Association 111835 111835 52072 CW EA Specialty Conference 678.00 Engineering Meeting Registration&Compliance Training Registration 15860 15860 52073 Del Mar Analytical 2,675.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 11720 11720 52074 Diamond H Recognition 606.53 Employee Service Awards 98221 98221 52075 Document Control Solutions, Inc. 764.34 Stationery&Office Supplies 120328 120328 52076 Dynamic Fabrication, Inc. 1,966.44 Auger Assembly Service 62025 11543 52077 Environmental Resource Association 283.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 107650 107650 52078 Environmental Science Associates 7,220.55 Professional Services J-40-5 68689 68689 52079 Equisery 4,360.00 Service Contract-Emission Tester 113873 113881 52080 Excel Door&Gate Company, Inc. 479.00 Maintenance&Repair Services 9970 11682 52081 FedEx Corporation 1,975.59 Air Freight 100933 100933 52082 Filarsky&Waft,L.L.P. 3,467.50 Prof.Services-SPMT Labor Negotiations Meetings&Special Services 66667 11800 52083 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 8,769.03 Lab Parts&Supplies 122850 122850 52084 Fleet Research, Inc. 335.00 Publication 106235 106235 52085 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 5.58 Meeting Supplies 30082 30082 52086 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 21,243.00 Long-Term&Short-Term Disability Ins.Premium 11981 11981 52087 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 1,067.65 Truck Wash Tickets 37655 37655 52088 Franklin Covey 97.56 Office Supplies 54076 71651 52089 Frost Engineering 2,835.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 12052 12052 52090 Fry's Electronics 754.24 Computer Supplies 12204 12204 52091 Ganahl Lumber Company 0.78 Lumber/Hardware 12263 12263 52092 Gates Fiberglass Installers 4,300.75 Fiberglass Repair 30605 30605 52093 George Yardley Co. 2,157.55 Plumbing Supplies 16951 16951 52094 Gerhardt's, Inc. 1,105.52 Engine Supplies 43967 12491 52095 WW Grainger, Inc. 1,201.41 Electrical Parts&Supplies 39950 12571 52096 Graybar Electric Company 149.78 Electrical Parts&Supplies 13451 13451 52097 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 37.63 Janitorial Supplies 120678 120678 52098 Gyrus Systems 4,995.00 On-Site Training Wizard 35730 35730 52099 GBC(General Binding Corp) 72.05 Stationery&Office Supplies 17136 17136 52100 Haaker Equipment Company 205.76 Automotive Parts, Supplies&Repairs 13928 13928 52101 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 64371 12685 52102 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 3,808.48 Valves 86676 86676 52103 Hill Brothers 4,876.59 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 40045 12802 52104 Hilti,Inc. 146.54 Tools 38869 38869 52105 The Holman Group 866.70 Employee Assistance Program Premium 12853 12853 52106 Home Depot 38.72 Misc. Repair&Maintenance Material 37647 37647 52107 Hub Auto Supply 182.05 Truck Parts 68566 68566 52108 Hummingbird Communications, Ltd. 2,625.09 Software Maint. 40660 13688 52109 Industrial Distribution Group 2,081.92 Mechanical&Paint Supplies 13101 13101 52110 Information Resources 1,040.00 Human Resources Service-Background Checks 103384 103384 52111 Roto Rooter 10,309.94 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 13223 13223 52112 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 237.58 Lab Supplies 66771 11164 52113 Invensys Systems, Inc. 1,819.15 Electrical Parts&Supplies 79249 79249 52114 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 381.25 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 122841 122841 52115 ICBO-International Council of Building 293.99 Publication 88225 88225 52116 J&L Industrial Supply 6,502.77 Tools 10954 10954 52117 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 3,531.72 Specialty Gases 4P Page 4 of 9 EXHIBIT A C Claims Paid From 04/01/03 to 04/15/03 Vendor# Vendor# Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 13426 13426 52118 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 4,795.00 Construction-Installation of Ozone Machine 13493 13493 52119 Jay's Catering 1,280.78 Meeting Expenses 13557 13557 52120 Johnstone Supply 777.75 Electrical Supplies 110921 110921 52121 Kindness General Contractors,Inc. 4,550.00 Construction-Install Concrete Island for Engine Lathe 116716 116716 52122 KW Communications Consulting 825.00 Prof.Serv.-Community Outreach Re Bushard Trunkline Replacement Project 17566 17566 52123 L&N Uniform Supply Co. 2,906.95 Printing OCSD Logo on Shirts,Jackets&Hats 115772 115772 52124 Lascomm 8,377.28 Computer Software/Hardware 122032 122032 52125 Leak Busters, Inc. 770.00 Professional Services-Electo-Scan Pilot Study 40774 13830 52126 Lee&Ro,Inc. 16,889.14 Professional Services P2-47-3 110138 110138 52127 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 281.02 Professional Services-Personnel Rules&Regulations Review 79775 79775 52128 Lorman Education Services 538.00 Project Management&Air Quality Training Registration 80469 80469 52129 Lucci's Gourmet Foods,Inc. 171.10 Meeting Expense 121443 121443 52130 M K Rittenhouse&Sons,Ltd. 484.40 Repair&Maintenance Material 32432 32432 52131 Mandic Motors 177.00 Towing Services 15309 15309 52132 MarVac Electronics 18.31 Electrical Parts&Supplies 112774 112774 52133 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 1,261.58 Executive Disability Plan Premium 32483 32483 52134 McGarry Central 90.43 Office Equipment Maintenance Agreement 35668 31077 52135 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,627.76 Mechanical&Electrical Parts&Supplies 15413 15413 52136 Medlin Controls Co. 2,629.85 Instrument Supplies 35182 35182 52137 Mid-West Associates 142.63 Pump Supplies 80653 80653 52138 Minarik 413.87 Instrument Supplies 15536 15536 52139 Mission Uniform Service 4,725.98 Uniform Rentals 64338 64338 52140 National Notary Association 70.00 Membership 15616 15616 52141 National Plant Services, Inc. 1,100.00 Vacuum Truck Services 41911 15704 52142 Neal Supply Co. 333.31 Plumbing Supplies 98511 98511 52143 NetVersant of Southern California 4,642.94 Security System Maintenance 69649 72451 52144 Nextel Communications 81.80 Cellular Phones&Air Time 61591 61591 52145 Norlab 1,800.00 Chemicals 61743 61743 52146 Olympic Creations 682.73 OCSD Lapel Pins 82835 82835 52147 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 163.44 Electrical Parts&Supplies 31190 97682 52148 Optic,Software,Inc. 4,590.00 Software Maintenance Agreement 90190 90190 52149 Orange County Hose Company 58.47 Hose Supplies 16002 116652 52150 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 892.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 16045 16045 52151 Ortiz Fire Protection 980.00 Sprinkler System Maintenance 16029 16029 52152 Oxygen Service Company 1,593.09 Specialty Gases 39571 39571 52153 OCB Reprographics 12,534.27 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 12757 64549 52154 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 43.75 Filters 115182 115182 52155 Pace Analytic Services 2,850.00 Lab Analyses of Wastewater&Biosolids 13469 13469 52156 Pacific Mechanical Supply 189.95 Plumbing Supplies 110681 110681 52157 Partners Consulting Services 6,780.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 11658 11658 52158 Parts Unlimited 31.19 Truck Supplies 13590 13590 52159 Patriot Video Productions 656.13 Video Taping Services 69657 69657 52160 Penn State 775.00 Registration 100087 100087 52161 PenValve 313.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 73621 73621 52162 Power Measurement Limited 200.00 Controller Repairs 88882 88882 52163 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 478.40 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 108741 108741 52164 Public Resources Advisory Group 3,465.56 Financial Advisory Services 122286 122286 52165 PCG Industries 1,800.00 Drive Shaft Repairs&Refurbishment Page 5 of 9 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/03 to 04/15/03 Vendor# Vendor# Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 67512 67512 52166 PCS Express 220.00 Courier Service 122577 122577 52167 PFE International, Inc. 3,126.50 Service-Intellitouch System-Complete Mail Center 121304 121304 52168 Quality Tool&Equipment,Inc. 3,210.95 Accutum Tire Changer 9777 9777 52169 Realtime Systems Corporation 6,937.50 Professional Services-Software Revisions 7317 7317 52170 Rellastar 9,351.65 Employee Medical Health Premium 32740 32740 52171 Rellastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,841.34 Employee Life Ins.Premium,Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ins.Payroll Deductions 70800 73461 52172 RBF Engineers 12,460.50 Engineering Services 2-24-1 11957 11957 52173 RPM Electric Motors 243.52 Motor 62391 62391 52174 S&J Chevrolet Allison Transmission 203.80 Truck Parts&Supplies 37129 37129 52175 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 6,900.00 Construction-Annual Infrastructure Repairs-Various Locations 42622 33777 52176 Schwing America, Inc. 93.89 Pump Supplies 10938 10938 52177 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 439.41 Tools/Hardware 34681 16459 52178 Supelco, Inc. 152.68 Lab Parts&Supplies 12474 12474 52179 SkillPath On-Site 5,100.00 On-Site Access&Excel Training 42690 12482 52180 Smith-Emery Company 1,338.50 Professional Services Pi-37 84144 84144 52181 Stewart's De-Rooting&Plumbing 4,364.00 Professional Services-Smoke Testing 16395 16395 52182 Sunset Ford 5.53 Automotive Parts&Service 42809 16424 52183 Sunset Industrial Parts 912.29 Mechanical Supplies 14197 14197 52184 Super Power Products 646.50 Janitorial Supplies 121030 121030 52185 Systems Source, Inc. 3,160.93 Office Furniture-(6)Chairs 77913 77913 52186 SCCW RP 75.00 Compliance Training Registration 36767 36767 52187 South Coast Environmental Co. 3,936.31 Cen Gen Emissions Testing Service 108257 111641 52188 SPX Valves&Control 8,597.16 Valves&Piping 120918 120918 52189 Team Scopellite Co. 7,610.00 Construction-OOBS Shower Rehabilitation 14912 14912 52190 Terminix International Co. 4,890.00 Pest Control 116783 116791 52191 Thermo Electron Spectroscopy 1,211.31 Lab Parts,Supplies&Repairs 38885 38885 52192 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 148.00 Blosolids Analysis 12790 12790 52193 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 414.58 Mechanical Supplies 40205 12845 52194 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 15211 82691 52195 Daily Pilot 193.75 Notices&Ads 10751 10751 52196 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 405.18 Locks&Keys 43001 17241 52197 Transcat 609.89 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 12941 12941 52198 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 1,270.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 10971 10971 52199 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 257.64 Automotive Supplies 10760 10760 52200 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 195.00 Lab Services 25030 11762 52201 US Filter Corporation 1,159.00 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 15579 15579 52202 Ultra Scientific 368.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 40256 13039 52203 United Parcel Service 158.23 Parcel Services 100159 104900 52204 Defense Finance and Accounting 6,952.45 Professional Services J-85-Naval Post Graduate School 120715 120715 52205 Univar USA 668.06 Chlorine 102859 102859 52206 Universal Specialties, Inc. 185.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 13143 13143 52207 Verne's Plumbing 1,715.00 Service Contract-Repair Backflow Devices&Retest 63546 70375 52208 Vortex Industries, Inc. 580.10 Door Repair 40387 13063 52209 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 5,733.64 Lab Parts&Supplies 42913 13186 52210 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,453.09 Security Guards 112301 112301 52211 Walden&Associates 1,035.18 Professional Services-Big Canyon Trunk Sewer 82552 104467 52212 Waste Markets Corp. 23,513.98 Malnt.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mat'I.Removal 43529 30621 52213 Waxie Sanitary Supply 269.98 Janitorial Supplies Page 6 of 9 EXHIBIT A e . Claims Paid From 04/01/03 to 04/15/03 Vendor# Vendor# Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 113929 113929 52214 Webster Environmental Associates,Inc. 23,303.75 Professional Services-Oxygen Ionization Study 61823 73146 52215 Wells Supply Company 60.47 Plumbing Supplies 66325 66325 52216 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 291.45 Safety Supplies 121726 121726 52217 Western Tech Service Company 710.00 Instrument Calibration 72952 72952 52218 WEF-Registration Dept. 600.00 O&M Meeting Registration 64573 64573 52219 WEF 694.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 82931 82931 52220 WS Atkins Water 11,000.00 Professional Services-UV Oxidation Demonstration Project 40491 13291 52221 Xerox Corporation 5,390.91 Fax&Copier Leases 8301 8301 52222 Sergio A.Araneta 524.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 79804 79804 52223 Lisa Arosteguy 725.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8117 8117 52224 Mark Castillo 119.82 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8045 8045 52225 Philip F.Cordova 274.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 4040 4040 52226 Patrick W.McNelly 390.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 4065 4065 52227 Mark Mutz 578.99 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 4072 4072 52228 Hal Nguyen 364.46 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 3540 3540 52229 Ddaze Phuong 539.32 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 3549 3549 52230 Alan D. Ralph 524.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 83387 83387 52231 Steven M.Thornburg 596.45 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 2511 2511 52232 Simon L.Watson 436.15 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 9312 9312 52233 Mark S.Wilson 381.26 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8467 8467 52234 Ernest N.Yeboah 683.57 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 82051 82051 52235 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 31691 31691 52236 Orange County Sanitation District 1,381.11 Petty Cash Reimb. 96081 96081 52237 Water Environment Federation 350.00 Source Control Training Registration 34905 34905 52238 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,200.00 Annexation Fee 90093 90093 52239 SAWPA 210,000.00 Refund for Advance CEOA/NEPA Consultant Fee-SARI 81269 81269 52240 American Express 27,185.18 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 62455 30787 52241 Bar Tech Telecom, Incorporated 48,640.00 Telephone Equipment Service Contract 16168 16168 52242 Orange County Sanitation District 568,800.86 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 16176 16176 52243 Orange County Sanitation District 40,347.75 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 111000 111000 52244 Postmaster General 162,992.25 Bulk Mailing-Rate Increase Notifications 103659 103659 52245 Able Scale Repair 4,760.97 Replacement of all Cables on Truck Loading Scales 40432 106745 52246 Airgas Safety 1,907.36 Safety Supplies 31595 31595 52247 AMSA 695.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 34649 34649 52248 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 121785 121785 52249 Cluff Industries 5,054.61 Lab Parts&Supplies 7173 7173 52250 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 38359 12044 52251 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 792.67 Electrical Supplies 12095 12095 52252 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 10,510.51 Valves&Plumbing Supplies 121401 121401 52253 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 32803 32803 52254 CASA 1,625.00 Admin.Meeting Registration 36847 36847 52255 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 460.00 O&M Training Registration-California Water Environment Association 11455 11455 52256 Electra-Bond,Inc. 2,128.06 Fusion Bond Spiral Heat Exchanger 39327 11009 52257 Electro-Test, Inc. 2,309.27 Professional Services-Cable Hipot Testing 106809 106809 52258 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 7,945.43 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 11041 11480 52259 Enchanter,Inc. 3,600.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 81904 81904 52260 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 123051 123051 52261 GITA-Geospatial Information&Tech. 95.00 Membership Page 7 of 9 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/03 to 04/15/03 Vendor# Vendor# Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70877 70877 52262 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 7270 7270 52263 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 3,237.06 Dues Deduction 105451 105451 52264 Intratek Computer,Inc. 2,760.00 Network&Server Maintenance 13346 13346 52265 Irvine Ranch Water District 6.00 Water Use 79775 79775 52266 Lorman Education Services 349.00 Human Resources Meeting Registration 35668 31077 52267 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,127.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 88831 88831 52268 The Mission Viejo News, Inc. 1,014.00 Notices&Ads 32521 32521 52269 National Academy Press 57.82 Publication 116599 116599 52270 National Bond&Trust 2,196.89 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 123078 123078 52271 National Environmental, Inc. 160.00 Human Resources Training Registration 123043 123043 52272 National Groundwater Association, Inc. 350.00 Lab Training Registration 16002 116652 52273 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 959.22 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 109145 109145 52274 OCDM Marketing 461.85 Processing Fees-Public Notice Mailing& Postage 33486 33486 52275 OCEA 524.61 Dues Deduction 10081 10081 52276 Pacific Bell 34.79 Telephone Services 120361 120361 52277 Pacific Bell/WorldCom 24.84 Telephone Services 37241 37241 52278 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 33515 33515 52279 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 7229 7229 52280 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,476.00 Dues Deduction 69657 69657 52281 Penn State 775.00 O&M Training Registration 42681 12407 52282 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 816.76 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 123060 123060 52283 SkillRamp 345.00 On-Site Word Training 97738 97738 52284 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 12589 12589 52285 So.Cal.Gas Company 22,052.83 Natural Gas 33283 33283 52286 Southern California Edison 9,502.64 Power 74835 74835 52287 State Board of Equalization 510.46 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 12790 12790 52288 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 550.11 Mechanical Supplies 33460 33460 52289 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 10065 10065 52290 Verizon California 2,438.83 Telephone Services 16635 16635 52291 Vision Service Plan 8,857.08 Vision Service Premium 13063 13063 52292 VWR Scientific Products 227.47 Lab Supplies 120601 120601 52293 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment 8002 8002 52294 Michael A.Berdis 197.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8651 8651 52295 Frank Chavez 409.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8109 8109 52296 Ronald C.Cortez 427.70 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 116759 116759 52297 Keith W.Criscuolo 347.62 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 9486 9486 52298 James M. Elo 330.13 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 3010 3010 52299 Norbert Gala 182.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 5003 5003 52300 Randy E.Harris 207.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 5021 5021 52301 Mike J.Herrera 380.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 33531 33531 52302 Deirdre E.Hunter 320.53 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 3524 3524 52303 John D.Linder 495.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 2022 2022 52304 David A. Ludwin 175.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 90309 90309 52305 Dong J.Min 1,275.28 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 107545 107545 52306 Enrique Pantoja 344.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 3540 3540 52307 Ddaze Phuong 299.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 3542 3542 52308 William F.Pierce 395.02 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 8862 8862 52309 Ken H.Wong 297.40 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Page 8 of 9 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/03 to 04/15/03 Vendor# Vendor# Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 8395 8395 52310 Morris C.Ying 1,137.55 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 97981 97981 52311 Edwards Lifescience,L.L.C. 15,466.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 8,968,906.73 Payroll Disbursements 29509-29612 Employee Paychecks $ 153,809.70 Biweekly Payroll 04/02/03 29616-29616 Interim Paycheck 859.21 Termination,Timesheet Correction,Reissue Returned Direct Deposit&Leave Payout 83590-84075 Direct Deposit Statements 839,872.58 Biweekly Payroll 04/02/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 994,541.49 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas, National Association 35,875.50 March Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas,National Association 126,878.22 Societe Generale February Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 162,753.72 Total Claims Paid 04/01/03-04/15/03 $ 10,126,201.94 Page 9 of 9 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/16/03 to 04/30/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 52312 Ballantyne,Inc. $ 40,725.00 Temporary Employment Services 52313 Basic Chemical Solutions 36,051.57 Sodium Bisuifite 52314 Black&Veatch Corporation 25,982.17 Engineering Services J-87 52315 Boyle Engineering Corporation 35,597.40 Engineering Services 1-2-4 52316 Carollo Engineers 497,850.27 Professional Services P1-60,P2-60&P2-66 52317 CH2MHill 40,276.75 Professional Services J-40-6&J-40-7 52318 Clba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 58,834.93 Cationic Polymer 52319 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 37,500.00 Professional Services-Fats,Oil&Grease(FOG)Study 52320 Hill Brothers 26,881.56 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 52321 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 165,409.86 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 52322 K-force Professional Staffing 53,314.75 Temporary Employment Services 52323 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 37,791.00 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 52324 Orange County Water District 56,808.68 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 52325 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 126,608.28 Sodium Hypochlorite 52326 Project Partners 46,577.54 Temporary Employment Services 52327 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 50,080.00 Construction-Annual Sewer Infrastructure Repairs at Various Locations 52328 Systime Computer Corp. 37,000.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One World XE Implementation 52329 South Coast Environmental Co. 42,046.78 Cen Gen Emissions Testing Service 52330 Teksystems 39,577.00 Temporary Employment Services 52331 Biosolids Holding Account 144,830.71 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 52332 U.S. Peroxide 138,920.59 Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 52333 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 33,268.00 Temporary Employment Service 52334 Steve P.Rados,Inc. 474,766.20 Construction 1-2-4 52335 Union Bank of Calif. 52,751.80 Construction 1-2-4, Retention 52336 A&G Industries 3,908.09 Strainer Probes 52337 A Biederman, Inc. 80.54 Instrument Supplies 52338 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 994.26 Lab Parts&Supplies 52339 Airgas-West 234.11 Lab Parts&Supplies 52340 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 2,478.25 Manhole Frames&Covers 52341 American Red Cross 175.00 CPR Classes&Supplies 52342 Appleone Employment Service 10,435.46 Temporary Employment Services 52343 Aquarium Doctor 185.02 Human Resources Aquarium Service 52344 Associated Readymix Concrete 396.65 Concrete 52345 ABM Business Machines,Inc. 255.00 Office Equipment Service 52346 AGM Electronics,Inc. 600.58 Electronic Supplies 52347 AKM Consulting Engineers 7,936.82 Professional Services 7-36&7-39 52348 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 183.08 Telephone Service 52349 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 57.41 Cellular Telephone Service 52350 AT&T Wireless Services 52.50 Wireless Phone Services 52351 Baker Tanks 3,136.00 Tank Rentals 52352 Basler Electric Company 1,981.63 Electrical Supplies 52353 Battery Specialties 323.25 Batteries 52354 Berendsen Fluid Power 269.39 Valves 52355 Blue Planet Foundation 2,500.00 Sponsorship-2003 Children's Water Festival 52356 Bush&Associates,Inc. 2,396.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 52357 California Automatic Gate 894.86 Gate Service 52358 California Industrial Supplies 630.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/03 to 04/30/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 52359 Southern California Marine Institute 11,528.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 52360 California Urban Water Conserv.Council 330.00 Membership 52361 Martin Boyer Co.,Inc.c/o Cambridge Int. 4,166.66 Prof.Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 52362 Cambridge Isotope Labs 490.07 Lab Parts&Supplies 52363 Cardlock Fuels 1,388.21 Fueling District Vehicles at Local Gas Stations 52364 CeI12Cell 205.04 Communication Equipment 52365 Imaging Express 1,792.31 Printer Service Agreement 52366 Coastal Conservancy 33.00 Subscription 52367 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 131.07 Lab Parts&Supplies 52368 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 12,250.00 Professional Services-Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures 52369 Communications Supply Corp. 259.73 Electrical Parts&Supplies 52370 Compressor Components of California 3,834.00 Coil Cleaning&Testing&Compressor Parts 52371 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 6,079.16 Electrical Parts&Supplies 52372 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 3,353.16 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 52373 Conveyor Components Co. 567.88 Electrical Parts&Supplies 52374 Cooper Energy Services 2,527.32 Engine Supplies 52375 Corporate Express Imaging 172.92 Computer Supplies 52376 Corporate Express 10,646.00 Office Supplies 52377 Cortech Engineering 3,979.00 Pump Supplies 52378 Cost Containment Solutions 1,245.50 Worker's Comp.Services 52379 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 314.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52380 County Wholesale Electric Co. 730.73 Electrical Parts&Supplies 52381 Culligan of Orange County 37.50 Maint.Agreement-Cen Gen Water Softener System 52382 CA Emissions Program 15.90 Vehicle Smog Testing Transmission 52383 CEM Corporation 751.88 Lab Parts&Supplies 52384 CGvL Engineers 1,878.64 Professional Services P1-94 52385 CR&R,Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals 52386 CROA 75.00 Membership-CA Revenue Officers Assn. 52387 CWEA Membership 368.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 52388 CWEA Specialty Conference 181.00 Engineering Meeting Registration 52389 Dapper Tire Co. 1,270.10 Truck Tires 52390 David's Tree Service 3,155.00 Tree Maint.Service 52391 Del Mar Analytical 2,272.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 52392 Delafield Corp. 395.26 Hose Assembly 52393 Detection Instruments Corporation 9,088.25 Ins. Parts&Supplies 52394 Detector Technology 554.23 Lab Parts&Supplies 52395 Document Control Solutions, Inc. 141.96 Stationery&Office Supplies 52396 Dyna-Med,Inc. 4,527.88 Safety Supplies 52397 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 1,693.18 Electrical Supplies 52398 Ecology Control Industries 9,896.51 Hazardous Waste Disposal 52399 Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. 5,019.60 Software/Hardware Maintenance 52400 Empire Scales, Inc. 265.00 Instrument Calibration 52401 Employers Group 1,540.00 On-Site Performance Review Training 52402 Enchanter, Inc. 7,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 52403 Environmental Resource Association 883.90 Lab Supplies 52404 ENS Resources,Inc. 15,202.52 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 52405 ESRI,Inc. 12,040.45 Meeting Registration 52406 FedEx Corporation 137.79 Air Freight 4 Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 04/16/03 to 04/30/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 52407 Filarsky&Watt, L.L.P. 2,470.00 Prof.Services-Labor Negotiations Services with OCSD's Bargaining Groups 52408 Fisher Controls International,L.L.C. 4,590.00 Information Technology Training Registration 52409 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 7,442.92 Lab Parts&Supplies 52410 Fluid Components Intl.c/o Ponton Ind. 803.13 Electrical Supplies 52411 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 461.90 Meeting Supplies 52412 Forestry Suppliers 1,084.23 Lab Parts&Supplies 52413 Fountain Valley Camera 14.87 Photo Supplies 52414 Franklin Covey 109.41 Office Supplies 52415 FormsTronicsRichards Capital Corporation 1,346.17 Accounts Payable Check Stock 52416 Ganahl Lumber Company 91.29 Lumber/Hardware 52417 Garland Manufacturing Co. 928.09 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52418 Gates Fiberglass Installers 2,944.75 Fiberglass Repair 52419 Getinge Castle 516.00 Lab Instrument Maintenance&Support 52420 Gilmour Group c/o Lippincott Co. 1,108.27 Garden Hoses 52421 Goldenwest Fence Company 1,524.73 Fence Repair&Maintenance Service 52422 WW Grainger,Inc. 1,305.84 Electrical Parts&Supplies 52423 Graybar Electric Company 1,037.64 Electrical Parts&Supplies 52424 Gyrus Systems 4,995.00 On-Site Training-Training Wizard,Crystal Reports 52425 Hach clo Ponton Industries 1,348.11 Lab Parts&Supplies 52426 American Sigma, Inc. 8,360.85 Pump Tubing 52427 Hilti, Inc. 879.23 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52428 Home Depot 455.91 Misc. Repair&Maintenance Material 52429 Idexx 12.93 Lab Parts&Supplies 52430 In Place Machining 1,972.00 Parts Machining Service 52431 Industrial Distribution Group 110.35 Tools 52432 Industrial Metal Supply 1,355.63 Metal 52433 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 192.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52434 Sewer Line Video Inspection 14,575.24 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 52435 IBM 2,120.53 Maintenance Agreement AS-400 52436 Interocean Systems, Inc. 2,730.89 Current Meter Service&Data Retrieval 52437 Intratek Computer,Inc. 1,722.60 Network&Server Maintenance 52438 Irvine Technology Corporation 12,400.00 Temporary Employment Services 52439 Isco, Inc. 104.48 Lab Parts&Supplies 52440 J&B Auto Parts 334.29 Auto Parts&Supplies 52441 J&L Industrial Supply 1,243.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52442 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,714.84 Ventilation Systems&Oxygen Sensors 52443 J.O'Brien Company,Inc. 421.24 Security Badge Supplies 52444 J.L.Wingert Company 536.38 Pump and Bypass Feeder 52445 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 3,535.00 Construction-Floor Drain Relocation at Main St. Pump Sta. 52446 Jay's Catering 1,399.12 Meeting Expenses 52447 Johnstone Supply 77.91 Filters 52448 J2 Printing Services 249.98 Printing 52449 Kalmar Promotions 247.06 Printing 52450 Kelly Paper 338.88 Paper 52451 Ken Thompson,Inc. 8,759.30 Construction-Pavement Repairs at Maint St. 52452 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 140.95 Lab Parts&Supplies 52453 Lab Support 5,498.76 Temporary Employment Services 52454 Lascomm 1,040.86 Computer Software/Hardware Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/03 to 04/30/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 52455 Lifecom-Safety, Inc. 3,970.59 Instrument Parts&Supplies 52456 Los Angeles Times 27.37 Publication 52457 Lucci's Gourmet Foods,Inc. 457.45 Meeting Expense 52458 LINJER 9,131.18 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 52459 Mamco International 1,422.30 Chemical Parts Cleaner 52460 Manatt, Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 5,000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 52461 Manley's Boller,Inc. 165.59 Boiler Parts 52462 Matthew Bender&Co.,Inc. 51.84 Publication 52463 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,176.15 Mechanical&Electrical Parts&Supplies 52464 Mec Analytical System 1,464.60 Toxicity&Grain Size Analyses 52465 Medlin Controls Co. 236.75 Instrument Supplies 52466 Meinhard Glass Products 804.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 52467 Michael Turnipseed&Associates 1,832.50 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 52468 Mid-West Associates 18,873.46 Pump Supplies 52469 Miller Equipment Co. 122.35 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52470 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 239.21 Janitorial Supplies 52471 Mine Safety Appliances 819.00 Instrument Supplies 52472 National Plant Services,Inc. 2,600.00 Vacuum Truck Services 52473 National Research Council Canada 321.77 Lab Parts&Supplies 52474 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 12,112.82 On-Site Training-Electrical Safety,High Voltage&Hands On Hydraulic 52475 NetVersant of Southern California 6,717.96 Preventative Maintenance Access Control System&CCTV 52476 New Pig 466.35 Spill Absorbent Materials 52477 Newark Electronics 690.99 Electrical Supplies 52478 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 80.65 Steel Tags 52479 NASSCO 250.00 Membership 52480 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,388.32 Office Supplies 52481 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 705.69 Electrical Parts&Supplies 52482 Oxygen Service Company 2,657.74 Specialty Gases 52483 OCB Reprographics 188.38 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 52484 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 303.38 A/C Filters 52485 Pacific Bell Internet Services 328.86 Internet Service 52486 Pacific Mechanical Supply 745.29 Plumbing Supplies 52487 Parker Supply Company 9,376.09 Mechanical Seals&O-Rings 52488 Parsons Infrastructure&Tech.Group 18,531.82 Professional Services-Asset Management 52489 Patriot Video Productions 478.79 Video Services 52490 PenVaive 2,698.22 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52491 Perma Pure,Inc. 72.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 52492 Pixelpushers,Inc. 23,540.00 Temporary Employment Services 52493 Port Supply 21.05 Rope 52494 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 272.19 Electrical Supplies 52495 Primary Source 644.65 Office Furniture 52496 Primavera Systems,Inc. 5,215.10 Software License-Expedition V8.5 52497 Profit Techniques,Inc. 2,500.00 O&M Team Building Training 52498 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 3,771.25 Pump 52499 Pump Engineering&/or QAir California 2,477.58 Pump Supplies 52500 Rainbow Disposal Co. 6,378.36 Trash Removal 52501 Rees Scientific 1,200.00 Lab Instrument Maintenance 52502 Remedy Temp,Inc. 8,383.83 Temporary Employment Services g .. Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT B d Claims Paid From 04/16/03 to 04/30/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 52503 Restek Corp. 342.03 Lab Parts&Supplies 52504 Retrofit Parts&Components, Inc. 410.99 Valves 52505 Ricoh Business System 3,247.80 Color Copier Lease 52506 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 2,428.05 Pumps 52507 RBF Engineers 4,528.84 Engineering Services 2-24-1 52508 RPM Electric Motors 448.24 Motor 52509 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 224.14 Paint Supplies 52510 Saybolt,L.P. 660.00 Air Analyses 52511 Schwing America,Inc. 367.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52512 Seton Name Plate Corp 176.79 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52513 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 380.31 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52514 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,332.96 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52515 Aldrich Chemical Co. 886.25 Lab Parts&Supplies 52516 Skalar, Inc. 975.70 Lab Instrument Repairs 52517 Skyline Publishing Company,Inc. 195.00 Subscription 52518 Smith-Emery Company 998.00 Prof.Services-Water Control&Soils Compaction Testing 52519 SoftChoice 27.25 Software 52520 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 14,960.45 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 52521 Southwest Scientific, Inc. 3,413.52 Instrument Supplies 52522 Sparkletts 1,736.34 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 52523 Spex Certiprep,Inc. 1,068.68 Lab Parts&Supplies 52524 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 375.00 Carpet Cleaning Services 52525 Strata International,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 52526 Summit Steel 1,614.12 Metal 52527 Sunset Industrial Parts 600.84 Mechanical Supplies 52528 Symcas-TSG 1,384.18 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 52529 SCCWRP 53.50 Publication 52530 SCP Science 471.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 52531 SPEC Services, Inc. 16,227.14 Engineering Services J-33-1 52532 SPX Valves&Control 2,143.92 Valves 52533 Taylor-Dunn 102.52 Electric Cart Parts 52534 Teletrac, Inc. 245.00 Monthly Air-Time Service Fee&Software/Hardware Maint.for Vehicle Tracking Sys. 52535 Terminix International Co. 1,395.00 Pest Control 52536 The Orange County Register 1,813.02 Notices&Ads 52537 Thermo Electron Scientific Instruments 697.64 Lab Parts&Supplies 52538 Thermo Finnigan,L.L.C. 72.45 Lab Parts&Supplies 52539 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 18,159.93 Mechanical Supplies 52540 Daily Pilot 50.00 Notices&Ads 52541 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 192.70 Locks&Keys 52542 The Training Clinic 7,651.10 On-Site Training-Managing Multiple Demands,Problem Solving,Stress Mgmt. 52543 Tran Consulting Engineers 1,000.00 Professional Services P1-88 52544 The Trane Company 3,187.00 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 52545 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 1,492.03 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 52546 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 50.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 52547 TCH Associates,Inc. 6,231.71 Lab Supplies 52548 Ultra Scientific 106.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 52549 United Parcel Service 24.10 Parcel Services 52550 University of Florida 525.00 Compliance Training Registration Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/03 to 04/30/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 52551 UC Regents 395.00 Human Resources Training Registration 52552 Vapex, Inc. 5,436.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 52553 Varian, Inc 1,170.94 Lab Parts&Supplies 52554 Varian Instrument Group 1,134.97 Lab Parts&Supplies 52555 Verizon California 29.69 Telephone Services 52556 Verne's Plumbing 690.00 Service Contract-Testing&Cert.Backflow Devices at Pits. 1 &2& Pump Sta. 52557 V L Systems, Inc. 1,063.75 Professional Services-SOL Server Tuning 52558 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,734.33 Lab Parts&Supplies 52559 The Wackenhut Corporation 15,379.36 Security Guards 52560 Waco Filter 768.66 Automotive Parts&Supplies 52561 Wally Machinery and Tool Supply, Inc. 2,372.44 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52562 Washington State Treasurer 116.00 Membership 52563 WateReuse Association 750.00 Lab Training Registration 52564 Waxie Sanitary Supply 105.59 Janitorial Supplies 52565 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 5,149.73 Gas-Powered Pipeline Cleaner&Cable Container 52566 WEF 170.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 52567 Xerox Corporation 8,444.62 Fax&Copier Leases 52568 David P.Halverson 535.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 52569 John H.Lin 1,064.82 Meeting(Training Expense Reimbursement 52570 Kenneth L.Ramey 137.01 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 52571 CWEA 180.00 Electrical/Inst.Malnt.Meeting Registration 52572 Orange County Sanitation District 1,376.89 Petty Cash Reimb. 52573 Schlegel, Rich 1,953.05 Employee Computer Loan Program 52574 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 52575 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 52576 Manuel Bros.,Inc. 30,059.00 Human Resources Training Registration 52577 Orange County Sanitation District 566,303.23 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 52578 Southern California Edison 77,193.75 Power 52579 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 125,715.64 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 52580 Airgas Safety 828.80 Safety Supplies 52581 AT&T Universal Biller 2,552.99 Telephone Service 52582 Coastal Conservancy 33.00 Compliance Training Registration 52583 Compressor Components of California 7,327.00 (2)Hydraulic Cylinders 52584 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,395.27 Plumbing Supplies 52585 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 280.00 Inspection Fees-Contract 7-41 52586 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 52587 CASA 20,000.00 Membership-Biosolids Program 52588 CWEA Membership 92.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 52589 Ecology Tire,Inc. 524.50 Waste Management-Tires 52590 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 7,945.43 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 52591 Employment Development Dept. 530.00 State Unemployment Tax 52592 WW Grainger, Inc. 94.70 Power 52593 Graybar Electric Company 263.44 Fiber Optic Cable 52594 City of Huntington Beach 16,624.47 Water Use 52595 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 11.21 Fasteners 52596 Internal Revenue Service 175.00 Wage Garnishment 52597 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 52598 Irvine Ranch Water District 50.35 Water Use Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT B � r Claims Paid From 04/16/03 to 04/30/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 52599 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1,714.40 Welding Equipment&Supplies 52600 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 83.50 Executive Disability Insurance 52601 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 819.67 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 52602 Multiforce Systems Corp. 3,750.00 Software Maintenance&Support 52603 National Bond&Trust 2,196.89 US Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 52604 City of Newport Beach 102.42 Water Use 52605 Oce-USA,Inc. 502.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 52606 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 2,082.03 Plumbing Supplies 52607 OCEA 524.61 Dues Deduction 52608 Pacific Bell 698.25 Telephone Services 52609 Primary Source 498.82 Office Furniture 52610 Project Management Institute 154.00 Membership 52611 Prudential Insurance Company of America 2,490.55 Employee Long-Term Care Insurance 52612 Rosemount/Uniloc 835,00 Instrument Supplies 52613 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 686.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 52614 Snap On Industrial 4,577.07 Tools 52615 So.Cal.Gas Company 10,595.95 Natural Gas 52616 Southern California Edison 26.57 Power 52617 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,639.43 Mechanical Supplies 52618 The Trane Company 954.12 Compressor 52619 The Unisource Corporation 413.75 Office Supplies 52620 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 52621 Verizon California 4,091.53 Telephone Services 52622 WEF-Registration Dept. 210.00 Compliance Training Registration 52623 Michael D.Moore 202.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 52624 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 705.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 52625 County of Orange-Health Care Agency 209.00 Underground Storage Tank,Hazardous Material&State Permit Fees Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,816,905.06 Payroll Disbursements 29617-29749 Employee Paychecks $ 178,254.86 Biweekly Payroll 04/16/03 29750-29751 Interim Paychecks 19,031.56 Termination Paychecks 29752-29859 Employee Paychecks 167,330.07 Biweekly Payroll 04/30/03 29860-29860 Interim Paycheck 2,731.68 Payroll Correction 84076-84563 Direct Deposit Statements 854,991.94 Biweekly Payroll 04/16/03 84564-85047 Direct Deposit Statements 872,701.93 Biweekly Payroll 04/30/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 2,095,042.04 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust $ 164,321.99 April Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 164,321.99 Total Claims Paid 04/16/03-04/30/03 $ 6,076,269.09 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT B BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 10a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR 2003-2004 OVERLAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve agreement for reimbursement with the County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department (Agreement No. D03-041) providing for the District to reimburse an estimated amount not to exceed $15,210 in conjunction with the County's 2003-2004 Overlay Maintenance Program to raise and adjust approximately 39 District manholes. SUMMARY • The Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department (PFRD) is constructing several street rehabilitation and improvement projects throughout the County of Orange, and has agreed to raise and adjust Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) sewer manholes within their construction contracts. • OCSD sewers have been constructed in County roadways under PFRD encroachment permits. The permit conditions require that OCSD adjust its manhole to match new paving. • PFRD has estimated the cost to adjust OCSD manholes to be a maximum cost of $325 per manhole plus 20% for administration costs. This work will be done as a separate bid item in PFRD's paving contract, and the final cost will be billed directly to OCSD after the contract is complete. OCSD will inspect the work to ensure the work is done correctly. • OCSD will approve any field change orders before the work is started. Any additional manhole work done by PFRD's Contractor will be added to the final invoice to OCSD per the Agreement. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This work will charged to the Revenue Area No. 15 and No. 7 operating budgets in an estimated amount of $ 15,210. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Revenue Area Budget) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This item will be paid from the District's Revenue Area No. 15 and No. 7 budgets. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) could hire a contractor to raise the manholes and coordinate the work with PFRD paving contractor. OCSD staff believes that it is more efficient and cost effective to include manhole adjustment in PFRD's paving contract. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None RLC:sa G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\Item 10(a).County of Orange.doc Revised: 8.20'01 Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 10(b Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Larry Rein, Project Manager SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWER — ARLINGTON, CONTRACT NO. 6-13-2; GRANT OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SEWER PIPELINE AND ASSIGNMENT OF ACCOMPANYING EASEMENT RIGHTS TO COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an agreement with Costa Mesa Sanitary District regarding Grant of Property Rights in Sewer Pipeline and Assignment of Accompanying Easement Rights Agreement, in a form approved by General Counsel, in connection with Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer— Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, providing for OCSD to pay annual user fees for five years in the amount of $5,252.57 annually. SUMMARY • The referenced project abandoned two of the oldest Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) sewers in Costa Mesa. The sewers were constructed in the 1940s and had deteriorated to a condition where they could not be maintained. Lack of maintenance was creating odor problems and concerns about pipe collapse. • The Airbase Trunk Sewers were no longer needed as trunk sewers because of the construction of the Fairview Trunk Sewer and the Gisler-Baker Trunk Sewers. • When the sewers were abandoned. a local sewer was constructed to replace the local service provided by the Airbase Trunk Sewers. The subject agreement transfers the local sewer to Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD) along with the accompanying easements. • The construction of the local sewers required an easement from Newport Mesa Unified School District (NMUSD). The easement acquisition agreement contemplated the transfer of the sewer to CMSD and stipulated. in exchange for the easement rights, OCSD would pay sewage fees owed by NMUSD to CMSD for a period of five years. The subject agreement also contains that provision. The fees are $5,252.57 per year for five years, for a total of $26,262.85. Incurring these costs was previously approved by the Board of Directors, April 24, 2002, as part of the approval of the easement acquisition. • Additional Construction Inspection costs were incurred for survey work needed to prepare easement descriptions. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of $26.262.85 is being requested to fund this agreement. Authorization of $7,000 is being requested to fund additional survey costs associated with preparing this agreement. A total of 533,263 will be transferred from Contingency Funds to Construction Administration and Construction Inspection. See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY02-03, Section 8, Page 35, Capital Improvement Budget) ❑ This item has been budgeted. but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer— Arlington ended OCSD's liability for a sewer system that no longer served OCSD's mission of regional service and could no longer be maintained. The subject transfer agreement completes this action by transferring responsibility for the local sewer to the local agency. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives were considered. CEQA FINDINGS This project is covered in the previously approved 1989 Master Plan/EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989 and the Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table LR:jo Wntglobal\Agenda Draft ReportsWoint Boards\AR 6-13-2.052803doc.doc 003747930 Revised: 8l20101 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK-ARLINGTON CONTRACT NO.6-13-2 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZA71ON TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(-.) Pr —t S S f StudrUP,nn s f Could PSA s S f Design SLAM s 21.000 $ 21.OD0 S 21.000 S 21,000 f 21 000 S 6 320 30•. Construction Cordmcl S 8500000 $ 850.000 S 850.000 $ 704346 S 704,346 S 704.346 100'. Construction AdminislrMion s 720001 S 72.OD0 $ 26.263 S 98.263 72,000 s 2%M s 98.263 S 47.435 48% Ca truaion Ins ion f 87,000 S 87.000 7000 S 94.000 1 87,000 % 7000 S 94.000 f 93,837 100•. Contin nc $ 100.000 S 100.000 s33.263 $ 66.737 1 s PROJECT TOTAL S 1.t30000 S 1,130.000 S - S 1.130.000 fi94.3.18 $26,263 $917AW f 851.939 9r. Reunlwr:aDb Cost: PROJECT NET I S 1,130000 S 1.130.000 1 s 884.346 f26263 I S 917.609 1 S 951.939 93% DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, April 24, 2003 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, April 24, 2003 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Shirley McCracken, Chair Ryal Wheeler Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Jan Vandersloot Jim Ferryman, Chairman, OMTS Committee Gerhardt Van Dreis Brian Donahue, Chairman, PDC Committee Julie Bixby Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Directors Absent: Blake Anderson, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the March 26, 2003 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (6) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Shirley McCracken reported on progress of the Legislative Advocacy Ad Hoc Committee. The committee continues to meet weekly on a number of issues and she discussed the most significant three; our biosolids bill AB 1427 (Maddox), ACA 10 which would amend Proposition 218, and support for federal grants. She also reported that staff members from Representatives Cox and Sanchez met with District staff and toured our facilities last week. Director Jim Silva volunteered to meet with Representative Rohrbacher. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 April 23, 2003 (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that a letter was received from the mayor of Santa Ana stating that their council had taken an action opposing the proposed one-year 15 percent user fee increase. A copy has been provided to all directors in their meeting folders. Director of Technical Services Bob Ghirelli discussed an emerging concept for improving cooperation in the Orange County Coastal Plain for improving water quality. It could result in an MOU or other institutional arrangement between the county, the Sanitation District and other public agencies. This would not be another layer of government but would focus on supporting and informing each other and eliminate duplicative efforts. The Steering Committee was reminded that there will be an Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee meeting on May 7 beginning at 3 p.m. Mr. Anderson suggested that the May OMTS Committee meeting be canceled. There aren't enough substantive matters to warrant a meeting. The Steering Committee agreed. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. Mr. Ghirelli updated the Committee members on the proposed county-wide development of a database for reporting and cataloging sanitary sewer overflows and the work the District and others are doing to comply with the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) that the Regional Water Quality Control Board issued last year. The Committee also reviewed a request from the Orange County City Manager's Association that the District act as county-wide coordinator of these compliance efforts. The Committee indicated support for cooperative approaches that provide effectiveness and lower costs in these kinds of regional efforts. Staff will be evaluating the costs implications and report to the OMTS Committee with recommendations on how much of a role the District should play and how much it will cost. B. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in May were reviewed. It was decided to cancel the May 7 OMTS Committee meeting because of a lack of required actions. C. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. There were no questions or clarifications requested. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 -April 23, 2003 (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT Because not all of the Steering Committee members were in attendance, Chair McCracken asked that the discussion on the general manager's performance be removed from Closed Session and continued to the May 28, 2003 meeting. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 28, 2003 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 28, 2003 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 5:45 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Sections 54956.8, 54956.9 and 54957.6, to discuss four items. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 7 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7 p.m. mitted by: a rf appan Ste ring Committee Secretary G:Wp.dtalagendU3teeiing CommitteelOMPRV42303 SC Minutes.dx �t t s MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE RE URBAN RUNOFF MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, May 7, 2003 A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, May 7, 2003 at 3 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don Bankhead, Ad Hoc Committee Chair Don Hughes, Supervisor Silva's office Patty Campbell, Director Larry McKenney, County of Orange Debbie Cook, Director Norris Brandt, IRWD Beth Krom, Director Richard Boone, OCPFRD Roy Moore, Director George Edwards, OCPFRD Don Webb, Alternate Director Chris Compton, OCPFRD Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Garry Brown Randy Fuhrman Directors Absent: Julie Bixby Norm Eckenrode, Director Dean Albright Jim Silva, Director/Supervisor Eileen Murphy Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Mary Sue Thompson Monica Hamilton STAFF PRESENT: Gerhardt Van Drie Blake Anderson, General Manager John Shafer Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services David Hamilton Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Jan Vandersloot Maintenance Carol Beekman, Communications Manager Tom Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Adriana Renescu, Engineering Supervisor Jean Tappan, Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM This was not required. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Julie Bixby and Dean Albright asked the Committee to consider the purchase and conversion of the Shea Property in Huntington Beach for a natural treatment system of wetlands. Randy Fuhrman spoke on the staff recommendations on the agenda and asked that the Committee continue to accept urban runoff and to consider other means for treating urban runoff. r Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Page 2 May 7, 2003 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The minutes of the September 26, 2002 meeting were ordered to be received and filed. (5) REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Don Bankhead did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Blake Anderson reported that ACA10 has passed out of committee and will go to the committee on elections later this month. The Legislative Advocacy Committee is working on strategy. Director Cook asked the public to support this amendment and suggested alternative ways to fund urban runoff through existing fees. Larry McKenny stated that cities have a legal responsibility and liability to handle urban runoff and the County is in the process of determining policy questions on partnering before the state requires this. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS — Item A A. Urban Runoff Program Evaluation and Program Development and Implementation 1. Seek approval of the Ad Hoc Committee to continue the Urban Runoff Program to accept additional urban runoff discharges above 4 MGD and up to 10 MGD for the next three years (2003-2006). 2. Seek direction of the Ad Hoc Committee to develop a policy regarding user charges when urban runoff flows accepted by the District exceed the 4 MGD fee threshold. 3. Contract for the services of a consultant to evaluate the technical, institutional and cost issues associated with continuing the District's Urban Runoff Program and expanding it beyond the 10 MGD cap to meet anticipated needs. Dr. Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, led a discussion with presentations by Adriana Renescu (OCSD) on the Urban Runoff Background and Status, and George Edwards (OCPFRD) on the County of Orange Dry Weather Urban Runoff Plan. Ms. Renescu provided the background and key facts of the District's program. There are now 16 diversion systems that discharge to the District's sewer system. Flows are about 2 MGD and 16 proposed diversion systems by the County will increase the flows to the District to close to the 4 MGD threshold. x Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Page 3 May 7, 2003 Mr. Edwards provided a briefing on the preliminary findings of their Stormwater Program Dry Weather Diversion Study. He indicated that they continue to validate the findings and explained the objectives. He located the existing and proposed diversions and described the various types of diversions and the estimated cost comparisons. He then described the County's decision making process for evaluating and constructing diversions, which include POTW considerations. The report should be complete by June 30, 2003 and collaborative discussions will begin thereafter on future direction. Ms. Renescu made a presentation on the findings of the OCSD program and expectations for the next three years. Phase II will provide for the development of the long-term urban runoff program. The actions before the Committee are to approve the continuation of the Urban Runoff Program; approval to accept flow above 4 MGD and up to 10 MGD; provide direction on developing urban runoff user charges; and fund Phase II development and implementation including the use of consultant services. A discussion on Prop 218 restrictions followed. If passed by the legislature and signed into law by the governor, ACA.10 will place before the voters a constitutional amendment to allow municipalities to raise fees for storm water and urban runoff management. The District would not be allowed to directly seek support of the proposal and will have to rely on others to promote the merits of exempting urban runoff fees from Prop 218 requirements. There is a need to educate the city council members and the public on the program and funding mechanisms. Norris Brandt described how the San Joaquin Marsh Wetlands natural treatment process worked and explained some of the costs. The Committee members discussed a wide range of issues including regulatory mandates, mission of the ad hoc committee, time frame, constraints, presentations to city councils, roles of impacted agencies, inland city participation, legal opinion on 218 restrictions, funding mechanisms, objectives, how to do the program most efficiently, impacts if we don't manage the resource, and a discussion on how we are going to implement the program and how to pay for it. Director Roy Moore left the meeting at 4:45 p.m. After discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to: 1. Continue the Urban Runoff Program to accept additional urban runoff discharges above 4 MGD and up to 10 MGD for the next three years (2003-2006) and move to Phase ll. 2. Seek direction of the Ad Hoc Committee to develop a policy regarding user charges when urban runoff flows accepted by the District exceed the 4 MGD fee threshold. 3. Contract for the services of a consultant to evaluate the technical, institutional and cost issues associated with continuing the District's Urban Runoff Program and expanding it beyond the 10 MGD cap to meet anticipated needs. x Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff t Page 4 May 7, 2003 (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 21, 2003 beginning at 3 p.m. Committee members directed staff to summarize the key issues for further discussion at the next meeting. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair pro tem declared the meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m. Submitted by: an Tappan, o mittee Secretary G:Iwp.dtalagendaWd Hoc ComtwlteeslUrban RunofR050703 AH Committee draft Minutes.doc DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING_, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION . COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Brian Donahue, Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Maintenance Alice Jempsa, Vice Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Patty Campbell Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager John Collins Larry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor Norm Eckenrode Matt Smith, Engineering Manager Beth Krom Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Patsy Marshall Brian Bingman, Project Engineer Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Adam Nazaroff, Project Engineer Bob McGowan Jeff Shubik, Project Engineer Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: None OTHERS PRESENT: Randy Fuhrman Jan Vandersloot Julie Bixby Bill Tappan Dean Albright Dick Harlow Ron Metzler Scott Hess (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman spoke on adding permanent positions instead of using consultants. J PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 May t, 2003 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Brian Donahue did not make a report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson was not present. (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin asked Jim Herberg, Engineering Planning Manager, to update the members on issues of easement access for a sewer line that parallels the San Diego Freeway between Fairview and the 55 Freeway. Pictures were shown of some of the problems that have surfaced in the last few years, in spite of letters sent to all easement holders advising them of the easement conditions and access that must be maintained. Staff will be contacting both the city of Costa Mesa and the land owners, and in some instances legal action may be required. Staff also noted that some of these homeowners may not have gone to the city for permits before constructing fences, etc. Legal Counsel will be making determinations on how to proceed. Staff will report back to the committee on its progress in implementing changes to allow our line cleaning vehicles to access the manholes. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (8) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-1) a. RECEIVE. FILE, AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the April 3, 2003 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached is the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an information only item. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There are two change orders this month for PDC Committee approval. C. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Attached is the PSA and Addenda Report. This is an information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 May 1, 2003 separately. There were no PSAs and one Addendum approved by the General Manager from March 21 through April 17, 2003. d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. g. PDC03-22 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro, Inc. for Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$63,449, increasing the total amount not to exceed$2,345,197 i. PDC03-24 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ninyo & Moore, to provide for Materials Testing, Inspection, and Geotechnical Engineering Service, Specification No. PSA-2001-33BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $100,000. j. PDC03-25 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush & Associates, to provide for Surveying Services, Specification No. PSA-2001-34BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $95,000 for each agreement ($285,000 total). k. PDC03-26 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Electro Test Inc., to provide Electrical Acceptance Testing Services, Specification No. PSA-2001- 35BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $175,000. I. PDC03-27 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Smith Emery GeoServices, to provide for Materials Testing, Inspection, and Geotechnical Engineering Service, Specification No. PSA-2002-33BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $100,000. Motion: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Remove Items e., f., and h. from the Consent Calendar. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 8(a-d, g, and i-I) under Consent Calendar. e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only item. l PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 May 1, 2003 Director McCracken reported that a response to the District's demand letter is reportedly forthcoming from SAWPA. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO ACCEPT THE STATUS REPORT. f. PDC03-21 Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Job No. J-35-2, with J. F.Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$115,280, increasing the total contract amount to$14,181,722. This Change Order is for PDC approval per delegated authority by Resolution No. OCSD 99-23. John Linder responded to Director Collins' concerns about omissions on the plans. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Job No.J-35-2, with J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$115,280, increasing the total contract amount to $14,181,722. This Change Order is for PDC approval per delegated authority by Resolution No. OCSD 99-23. h. PDC03-23 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, with Green Giant Landscape, Inc., authorizing an addition of$12,761, increasing the total contract amount to $413,187; and (2) Accept Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. John Linder responded to Director Collins' concerns about omissions on the plans. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, with Green Giant Landscape, Inc., authorizing an addition of$12,761, increasing the total contract amount to $413,187; and (2) Accept Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. (9) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-d) a. PDC03-28 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Establish a budget in the amount of$262,800 for Underground Storage Tank Evaluation and Remediation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98; and (2) Approve Professional Services Agreement for Underground Storage Tank Evaluation and Remediation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98, with KOMEX, to provide testing and evaluation services, for an amount not to exceed $96,231. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Establish a budget in the amount of$262,800 for PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 May 1, 2003 Underground Storage Tank Evaluation and Remediation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98; and (2) Approve Professional Services Agreement for Underground Storage Tank Evaluation and Remediation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98, with KOMEX, to provide testing and evaluation services, for an amount not to exceed$96,231. b. PDC03-29 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve partial payment of funds to the City of Garden Grove for Contract No. CP-0003 that was originally budgeted in FY2000-01, in the amount of$84,852.98. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve partial payment of funds to the City of Garden Grove for Contract No. CP-0003 that was originally budgeted in FY2000-01, in the amount of$84,852.98. Director Collins left the meeting at 6:24 p.m. C. PDC03-30 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black& Veatch Corporation providing construction support services for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, for an additional amount of $2,082,459, increasing the total amount not to exceed $6,196,938. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black& Veatch Corporation providing construction support services for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, for an additional amount of$2,082,459, increasing the total amount not to exceed $6,196,938. Director Patsy Marshall opposed the motion. d. PDC03-31 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Program Management Consultants, a joint venture of Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. and CH2M Hill, Inc., authorizing: (1) An increase to the five-year agreement in the amount of$35,000,000, for a total amount not to exceed $50,000,000; (2) An increase for the first year of the agreement for an additional amount of$449,934, increasing the total amount not to exceed $4,385,217 for FY2002/03; and (3) Establish an amount not to exceed $12,484,750 for year two of the contract, FY2003/04. David Ludwin presented information on the need for additional engineering and construction consultant services in order to complete the CIP program in the time frame approved by the Board. A PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 May 1, 2003 Staff will confer with General Counsel about a conflict of interest as a result of having the same firm performing the Asset Management project and this project and include a statement in the revised agenda report. Mr. Ludwin offered to hold a workshop for the directors or to meet with them individually to help them understand the complexities of the program and required staffing levels, as well as the advantages of using consultants versus full-time employees. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Program Management Consultants, a joint venture of Parsons Infrastructure &Technology Group, Inc. and CH2M Hill, Inc., authorizing: (1)An increase to the five-year agreement in the amount of$35,000,000,for a total amount not to exceed $50,000,000; (2) An increase for the first year of the agreement for an additional amount of$449,934, increasing the total amount not to exceed $4,385,217 for FY2002/03; and (3) Establish an amount not to exceed $12,484,750 for year two of the contract, FY2003/04. Directors Patty Campbell and Patsy Marshall opposed the motion. (10) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (11) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY a. PDC03-32 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1) Receive and file petition requesting annexation of 4.88 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Bolsa Chica Avenue and Los Patos Avenue, bordering the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-08, authorizing initiation or proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29—Shea Homes Annexation). A written comment was received from Eileen Murphy, Huntington Beach, opposing the Shea Annexation. Jan Vandersloot, Julie Bixby and Dean Albright spoke opposing the annexation as the land could better be served as natural wetlands. Ron Metzler and Dick Harlow, representatives of the land owners/developers explained the project. PDC Committee Minutes Page 7 May 1, 2003 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1) Receive and file petition requesting annexation of 4.88 acres to Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) in the vicinity of Bolsa Chica Avenue and Los Patos Avenue, bordering the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-08, authorizing initiation or proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29—Shea Homes Annexation). Director Patty Campbell opposed the motion. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (14) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 5, 2003 at 5 p.m. (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. Submitted by: Je Tappan P Committee Secretary G:\wp.dta\agenda\PDC\2003Wfinutes\050103 PDC Minutes.doc PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 05/01/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC03-22 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND OAT PLANT 2, JOB NO. P2-39 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro, Inc. for Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M. N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of S63,449, increasing the total amount not to exceed S2,345,197. SUMMARY • Job No. P2-39, Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, includes the cleaning of accumulated grit from the digesters, installing a flow mixing system to increase digester efficiency and reduce grit accumulation, insulating four of the digester domes to reduce heat loss, adding an interior plastic liner on the digester domes, and upgrading the digester control systems. Construction of this project was completed in December 2002. • Lee and Ro was the Design Consultant and prepared the plans and specifications for this project. Design of this project was completed before the District had developed Standards for Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) and Equipment and Instrument Database (EID). Addendum No. 8 includes additional work for Lee and Ro to complete as built P&IDs and EID for this project per the District standards and was not included in the original scope of work for Job No. P2-39. • Lee and Ro provided design engineering services and construction management services for the subject project and is familiar with the equipment installed and rehabilitation work completed on this project. Staff is satisfied with Lee and Ro's previous work and hence recommends them for completing the as built P&IDs and developing the EID. Revised: 8/10/98 Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Addendum No. 8 is for an amount not to exceed $63,449 and will amend the PSA to an amount not to exceed $2,345,197. Please refer to the attached PSA Status Report for a summary of costs associated with the PSA. The PSA includes costs for other projects including P1-40-1 , P2-47-1, P1-47, and P2-39. The attached Budget Information Table shows the proposed adjustments. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 80) ❑ This item has been budgeted. but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The additional scope of work for Addendum No. 8 consists of the following tasks for Job No. P2-39 to comply with the new District Standards: 1. Field-verify the P&IDs and identify equipment and devices installed under P2-39. 2. Collect and record equipment nameplate data for P2-39 equipment and devices. 3. Research shop drawings for missing information required to complete the EID. 4. Develop an EID database for all P2-39 equipment and devices. 5. Update the District's baseline P&ID files in PDS to reflect all physical improvements made under P2-39. Utility P&ID's are not required. 6. Update the P&ID's for equipment installed under Job No. P2-39 to reflect all software improvements using the SAT Tables and PLC Program Flow Chart. E:109F, Page 2 ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with Addendum No. 8 (No action). This alternative is not recommended because of the following impacts: • Baseline documents for P&IDs will become out of date, incorrect, and unreliable. • CMMS database will not be updated and may impact preventive and predictive maintenance work for equipment installed. CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA and District's guidelines, Section 15301 (B). The Notice of exemption was filed with the County Clerk on March 17, 1998. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Consultant's Proposal UM:dm Wntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\AR P2-39 Add#8 050103.doo Revised: 8/10198 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I,J,K,L,M,N,AND O AT PLANT NO,2 JOB NO.P2-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECLTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REOUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(-.I Protect Developmerd Studres/PemMtin Consultant PSA S 1.045.000 S 900.000 $ 43259 S 943259 879,010 _ 63.449 S 943.259 $ 679.710 93°. Design Staff S 130.000 S 844.000 $ $ 844.000 i 844.ODC S 844.000 $ 844.000 100-. Construction Contract $ 9.87500D $11023.000 $ - $ 11,023.000 5 10.907,147 1 - $ 10.907.147 $ 10.907147 100% Construction(other) I s 1007,000 $ 43,259 $ 963.741 5 481.90B $ 481,908 S 481 F908 100% Construction Staff $ 50,000 $ 1,380,000 $ - S 1,380.DDO I 5 1.380.000 1 S 1,380.000 1 S 1.349.000 1 98-. Conti S . $ - S $ PROJECTTOTAL S 11.100,000 15,154,000 S $15.15401- 865 $ 63.449 S 14.556.314 S 14.461766 --- Reimb—ble Costs PROJECT NET S 11,100.000 1 1>4,000 515,154.D00 S 14492,865 $ 63,449 $ 14.556,314 S 14461.765 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N,and O at Plant 2 Job No. P2-39 Total Project Budget: PSA dollars spread over P1-40-1, P2-47-1, P1-47, and P2-39 Consultant: Lee & Ro, Inc. Start Date of Project: June 1993 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 12/8/93 Original PSA Studies and design for tasks that will generate four construction projects,Job Nos.P11-40-1,P2-47-1, $1,160,000 $1,160,000 P1-47 and P2-39. P1-40-1 and P2-47-1 provides for the design of 23 tasks for miscellaneous projects at Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 including trickling filter rehab,filtrate routing,building structural and ventilation Improvements,drainage improvements and odor control,electrical equipment upgrades,gate replacements,site improvements and other safety and operational improvements. P1-47 provides a 12kV distribution system for support facilities at P1,and fire alarm system upgrades. P2-39 rehabilitates 7 digesters and provides PLC controls stem for all digesters at P2 1 Change type of switchgear for Job No.P1-47 rescinded $1,160,000 8/29/95 2 Conduct study for Job No.P1-47 $11,166 $1,171,166 9/25/96 3 Revise P1-47 design to install electrical equipment In a building. $76,801 $1,247,967 11/20/96 4 Provides for 12 items of changes to the scope for Pi-40-1,P2-47-1 and $244,277 $1,492,244 P2-39. See table titled"Summary of Scope of Work Changes for Addendum No.4"(attached). 12/15/98 5 Provides for design changes for Job No.P2-39 to modify digester electrical rooms to allow designation $280,234 $1,772,478 of"unclassified"per the requirements of the revised fire protection code for wastewater treatment facilities. Provides for additional construction support for Job Nos.P2-47-1 and P2-39. 5/18/99 6 Provides for design changes for Job No.P2-39 to delete full automation of all digesters,delete further $(65,000) $1,707,478 work for glare and heat reduction in the Administration Building Lobby,to delete further work for the Secondary Upgrades at Plant No.2,and delete design of the temporary filtrate clarifier at Plant No.2. The digester rehabilitation project,P2-39,shall be revised to accommodate automation changes into the current design which is at the 85%design level. 9/26/01 7 Provides for design changes for Job Nos.P1-40-1 and P2-47-1 to add hardware and software necessary $574,270 $2,281,748 to upgrade the existing oxygen activated sludge process instrumentation and control system,implement approved reinvention ideas,and bring the existing design up to the Districts most recent engineering design standards. EDMS 003747507 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending 8 Provides for development of as built Process and Instrumentation Diagrams(P and IDs)and Equipment $63,449 $2,345,197 and Instrument Database(EID)for Job No.P2-39 EDMS 003747507 ADDENDUM NO. 8 TO AGREEMENT THIS ADDENDUM NO. 8 TO AGREEMENT, is made and entered into to be effective the day of , 2003, by and between the ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and LEE & RO, INC., of City of Industry, for purposes of this agreement hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT". W ITNESSETH: WHEREAS, DISTRICT and CONSULTANT have previously executed an Agreement dated December 8, 1993, together with Addendum No. 1 rescinded, Addendum No. 2 dated August 29, 1995, Addendum No. 3 dated September 25, 1996, Addendum No. 4 dated November 20, 1996, Addendum No. 5 dated December 15, 1998, Addendum No. 6 dated May 18, 1999, and Addendum No. 7 dated October 15, 2001 for professional services for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and process Evaluation at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. P1-40-1, P2-47-1, P1-47, and P2-39; and, WHEREAS, DISTRICT has determined that additional services are required to provide engineering services necessary to provide as built Process and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) and develop Equipment and Instrument Database (EID) for Job Number P2-39; and, WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to provide the necessary services in connection with these additional requirements based on its demonstrated competence and has agreed to provide the necessary engineering services, and has been selected in Addendum No. 8 -1- Job Nos. P1-40-1,132-47-1, P1-47, and P2-39 accordance with the DISTRICT selection policy regarding professional services; and, WHEREAS, DISTRICT acting through its Planning, Design and Construction Committee, has negotiated with CONSULTANT, and has certified the final negotiated fee for said services as reasonable, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has accepted the recommendation of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee pursuant to Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, and has approved this Addendum No. 8 between DISTRICT and CONSULTANT. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual benefits, which will result to the parties in carrying out the terms of this Addendum No. 8, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. CONSULTANT agrees to provide services necessary to provide engineering services necessary to provide as built Process and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) and develop Equipment and Instrument Database (EID) for Job Number P2-39 as outlined in Consultant's Letter Dated February 6, 2003 and, designated as Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this Addendum No. 8 to Agreement and the Scope of Work dated January 14, 2003, designated at Exhibit "B". 2. Article 2 of that certain Agreement dated December 8, 1993, between DISTRICT and CONSULTANT is hereby amended to increase the total compensation by $63,449 from $2,281,748 to an amount not to exceed $2,345,197, all in accordance with the same terms and conditions as otherwise specified in Article 3 and the other provisions of said Agreement. Addendum No. 8 -2- Job Nos. P1-40-1,P2-47-1, P1-47, and P2-39 3. The additional compensation authorized hereby and sums paid by DISTRICT to CONSULTANT pursuant hereto shall be based upon and allocated as follows: Existing Agreement Change per Amended as Amended Addendum No. 8 Agreement Engineering Services, (direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 165%), Not to Exceed $2,069,562.60 $58,749.00 $2,128,311.60 Subconsultant Fees and Costs, Not to Exceed $41,000.00 $0.00 $41,000.00 Profit $171,185.40 $4,700.00 $175,885.40 Direct Costs, Not to Exceed $0 $0 $0 Total, Not to Exceed $2,281,748.00 $63,449.00 $2,345,197.00 Total compensation allowed under this Agreement shall not exceed $2,345,197.00. 4. DISTRICT agrees to pay CONSULTANT on a monthly basis pursuant to Invoices submitted to DISTRICT from CONSULTANT and as approved by the DISTRICT's Director of Engineering. 5. This modifying Addendum is supplemental to the Agreement dated December 8, 1993, and Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 and is by reference made a part of said Agreement. All of the terms, conditions and provisions thereof, unless specifically modified herein, shall continue in full force and effect. 6. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Addendum and any of the provisions of the original Agreement and Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, the provisions of this Addendum No. 8 shall in all respects govern and control. Addendum No. 8 -3- Job Nos. P1-40-1,P2-47-1, P1-47, and P2-39 j� �1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum No. 8 to Agreement has been executed in the name of the DISTRICT by its officers thereunto duly authorized and executed by CONSULTANT as of the day and year first above written. - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT By Chair, Board of Directors Date By Secretary, Board of Directors Date By Contracts/Purchasing Manager Date Approved as to Form: Marc Dubois Date Contracts/Purchasing Manager LEE & RO, INC. By By Um:dm EDMS 003747505 Addendum No. 8 -4- Job Nos. P1-40-1,P2-47-1, P1-47, and P2-39 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 5/1/03 5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC03-23 13(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-84 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, with Green Giant Landscape, Inc., authorizing an addition of $12,761, increasing the total contract amount to $413187: and (2) Accept Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY • This project is required to comply with the Plant No. 2 Coastal Development Permit and the Urban Design Element of the 1999 Strategic Plan. The purpose of the project is to shield views of Plant No. 2 from Pacific Coast Highway as effectively as possible given restrictions imposed by the California Department of Fish and Game. • Borthwick-Guy-Bettenhausen, Inc. prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Green Giant Landscape, Inc., on August 20, 2002. • Change Order No. 1 includes three items of added work and one item of deleted work. There are two omissions associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this project are S1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date August 20, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date February 15, 2003 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date February 15, 2003 Actual Completion Date February 15, 2003 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Revised. 8'10%98 Page 1 Change Order No. 1 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Additional Survey and Soil $9,248.00 0 Omission Placement 2 Protective Fence Addition $2,349.00 0 Omission 3 Import Additional Soil $40,410.00 0 Changed Condition 4 Fence Deletion ($39,246.00) 0 Design Change Total Change Order No. 1 $12,761.00 0 Item 3 includes costs to transport additional soil from the northern portion of Plant No. 2 to build the westerly verdure modular wall. The specified soil stock pile was not sufficient. Job Completion The project is now 1000/0 complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $400,426.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (DedUet) $ 12,761 .00 Change Orders to Date $ 12,761 .00 Percentage Increase to Date 3.19% Amended Contract Price $413,187.00 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8 — Page 139) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) There is no change in the project budget. Please refer to the Budget Information Table ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None Re:Ise 1 F 1� Page 2 ev ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order CH:dm Wntglobal\Agenda Draft ReportsTMAR P2-84 CO#1 050103.doc Revised: 8/10M Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Landscape and Irrigation at Plant#2 JOB NO.P2-84 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT 13UDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATIO14 TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Prowl Developmem S 9.000 S 8.000 S 8,070 3 8.152 S 8.152 S 8.000 98.. Studies/PemltbN 5 16.000 S 9.000 $ 9.000 $ 9.000 S 9,000 S 4.500 6W. Consultant PSA $ 85.000 $ 164.046 S 164.046 S 164.046 S 164.046 S 132,000 80°. Design Staft $ 20.000 $ 47905 S 47.905 $ 47.905 S 47.905 S 25.000 52°. Constntotion Contmd $ 420.000 S 460.000 S 460.000 S 400.426 S 12.7%.1 S 413.187 S 400.426 97°. Constriction Administration $ 50.000 S 50,0001 S 50.000 S 50.000 S 50.000 S 41.000 82% Constnxtion Inspecbon S 30.000 S 30,000 S 30.000 S 30.000 S 30A00 $ 29.000 97% Con $ 180.00O S 41.049 S 41.049 PROJECT TOTAL S 810.000 S 810.000 S 810.000 S 709.529 $ 12.7, S 722.290 $ 639.926 H8991'. Rm bumble Co:L• PROJECT NET I S 810A00 I S 810.000 I$ ala a:o I I S 709.529 S 12,,61 1 S 722.290 $ 639.926 89°. ' CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AT PLANT NO.2 JOB NO.P2-84 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 8/20/2002 $400,426 $400,426 0.00 0 180 lee " fool,ol, { °k& F kgg § bFii Iy�8f1CFg� :h+3 f. § 8,76 r''fir-.� 7i1 $7k s kskn0 �� Aw, . c 9 Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Green Giant Landscape, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: May 28, 2003 Job: Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84 Consultant: Borthwick Guy Bettenhausen Amount of this Change Order(Add) $12,761.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —ADDITIONAL SURVEY AND SOIL PLACEMENT This item is for labor, materials, and equipment necessary to provide additional survey and to add soil to the westerly wall. The contours shown on Drawing No. C1006 did not represent the existing vertical elevations at the West end of the project. Additional earthwork was required due to limited vertical survey performed prior to the project bid. The Contractor was directed to provide additional survey and add approximately 20 inches of fill material to the footing of the westerly wall at elevation 5.0. The affected area contained approximately 4,050 square feet. The needed soil was taken from the specified soil stockpile near the job site. This added work was necessary to properly build the Western Verdura Modular Concrete Retaining Wall and was not included in the contract documents. Work items listed above were negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Division 1, Section 43.13.1 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 1 and Green Giant Landscape's letter dated December 18, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $9,248.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2— PROTECTIVE FENCE ADDITION This item is for labor, materials, and equipment necessary to install 405 feet of 30 inch high averary fabric fence work with steel posts. The original design did not include provisions to place a barrier for protection of newly planted material from rabbits and squirrels. At Plant No. 2, when installing new young seedlings, the District has experienced extensive damage from native animals.The choices were to apply pesticides continually for a period of 6 months or provide a temporary barrier until the plant material was established. The District chose the barrier. Work items listed above were negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Division 1, Section 43.13.1 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 2 and Green Giant Landscape's letter dated January 21, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,349.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Y Page 2 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Green Giant Landscape, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: May 28, 2003 Job: Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84 Consultant: Borthwick Guy Bettenhausen ITEM 3— IMPORT ADDITIONAL SOIL This Item includes extra work necessary to transport soil from the Northerly part of Plant 2 to the job site to construct the 16 foot high Western Verdura Modular Concrete Retaining Wall.This extra work does not include soils for the wall footing which are included in Item No. 1 of this change order. This item includes costs to excavate, load, classify, and transport 3,157 cubic yards of soil approximately 1/2 mile. Soils verification was required to be performed to make sure that the new import soil was similar in characteristics to the specified on-site stock pile and also complied with the specified criteria for the block wall construction. The contract specified stockpile of soil designated to build the two Verdura Modular Concrete Retaining Walls did not contain sufficient quantities of soil needed to construct the walls. Work items listed above were negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Division 1, Section 43.13.1 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 3 and Green Giant Landscape's letter dated January 9, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $40,410.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4— FENCE DELETION This item is for a deletion of contract work which included the removal of an existing fence and addition of a new fence. Staff determined that the condition of the existing south perimeter fence did not warrant replacement. This item includes a credit for the removal and disposal of 250 feet of the existing fence, and the materials and installation costs associated with the contract specified replacement fencing. Work items listed above were negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Division 1, Section 43.13.1 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 4 and Green Giant Landscape's letter dated February 28, 2003. CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($39,246.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $12,761.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Green Giant Landscape, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: May 28, 2003 Job: Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84 Consultant: Borthwick Guy Bettenhausen The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a no time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 20, 2002 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: February 15, 2003 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 15, 2003 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: February 15, 2003 Original Contract Price $400,426.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0 .00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 12,761.00 Amended Contract Price $413,187.00 Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Green Giant Landscape, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: May 28, 2003 Job: Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-84 Consultant: Borthwick Guy Bettenhausen BOARD AUTHORIZATION DATE: May 28 ,2003 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager Approved by: David Ludwin P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: Green Giant Landscape, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS 003747190 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 05/01/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT itam NumhPr I Item Number 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwi , Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR MATERIALS TESTING AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-33BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ninyo & Moore, to provide for Materials Testing, Inspection, and Geotechnical Engineering Service, Specification No. PSA-2001-3313D, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $100,000. SUMMARY • In May 2001 , the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Ninyo & Moore for Fiscal Year (FY) 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for FY 2002/2003 and $100,000 for FY 2003/2004. In June 2002, their agreement was renewed for the first of the two one-year periods, for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for FY 2002/2003. • Staff has determined that a second one-year renewal is required to successfully complete materials testing, inspection, and geotechnical engineering services on capital projects during the next fiscal year. • The PSA amount for this consultant will be used on an as-needed basis. Testing services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All services will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The PSA renewal amount for this consultant for FY 2003/2004 is listed in the table below. This amount was Board approved in June 2002 and was derived by staff by considering average testing hours of past years, along with present testing and geotechnical fees and scheduled future capital projects. G:lnlglobaNAgenda Draft ReporlslPMAR Soils Addd2.NinyoWoore PSA-2001-33BD-050103.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 1 Consultant FY 2003/2004 Nin o & Moore $100,000 TOTAL $100,000 BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Materials testing and geotechnical services funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A ATTACHMENTS 1 . Scope of Work 2. Fee Schedule with Escalation Rates 2003/2004 3. PSA Status Report BP-.ba GAntg1obaAA9enda Draft Repons\PDCWR Soils Add#2.Ninyo&Moore PSA-2001-33BD-050103.doc Revised: 8/20198 Page 2 ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK For MATERIALS TESTING, INSPECTION, AND OTHER GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-33BD TYPICAL TASKS SOILS: Provide lab testing for maximum density, sieve analysis and soil identification. Field-test compacted soil using sandcone and nuclear density meter methods. Inspect compaction efforts by contractors to achieve specification-required densities. On a less frequent basis, be prepared to conduct soil sampling to depths as required by the District. CONCRETE/MASONRY: Provide concrete, mortar and grout cylinder compressive testing, masonry prism test, and shear test on brick cores. Pick up test specimen from construction sites. ASPHALT: Provide density field testing and core sample collection and lab testing. Inspect compaction efforts by contractors to achieve specification-required densities. METALS: Provide tensile strength lab testing. Provide field testing for welds and inspect welding operations. REQUIREMENTS 1. Field technician shall be available upon 24-hour notice. 2. Invoices shall be coded with District assigned project title and job or contract number along with an adequate work description of the services provided. 3. All test results shall be clearly summarized in a standard report format and submitted to the District. 1 4_ Field technicians shall provide a detailed daily report for each day of field testing and observation. 5. Field technicians shall be available for occasional night work upon 24-hour advance notice. 6. Equipment that requires calibration shall be calibrated prior to the work. Calibration costs shall be included in the total hourly rate for field service fees. G:\wp.dta\eng1JOBS&CONTRACTS\Soils,Survey,E-Testing Contracts FY 01-041Soils\Soils SOW 2001 to 2004.doc 2 ATTACHMENT B SOILS, MATERIALS TESTING: NINYO S MOORE FEES A. Lab Testing Fees All-Inclusive Unit Prices 7/1/01-6/30/02 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30/04 1 0' A.1.1 Maximum Density: $140.00 $142.80 $145.86 A.1.2 Sieve Analysis: $95.00 $96.90 $98.84 A.1.3 Soil Identification: $125.00 $127.50 $130.05 A.2 Masonry and Concrete A.2.1 Concrete Compressive Strength: $19.W $19.38 $19:77 A.2.2 Shear Test on Brick Cores: $125-00 $127.50 $130.05 A.2.3 Mortar/Grout Compression Test: $19.00 $19.38 $19 77 A.2.4 Mason Prism Test: $90.00 $91.80 $93.64 A.3 As halt A.3.1 Core Sample Testing: $75.00 $76.50 $78.03 A.4 Metals A.4.1 Tensile Strength: $42.00 $42.84 $43.70 (Escalation rate for Lab Testing Fees=2%per year) B. Field Service Fees All-inclusive Hourly Rates 7/1/01-6130/02 7/1/02-6/30/03 711103-6130104 B.1 soils B.1.1 Compaction Testing/inspection: $70.00 E71.40 $72.83 B so and Concrete B.2.1 Test Specimen Pick-U Unit Rate): $45.00 $45.90 $46.82 8.3 As halt B.3.1 Compaction Inspection/Density Test: $70.00 $71.40 $72.83 a B.4.1 Welding Inspection: $70.00 $71.40 $72.83 B.4.2 Dye Penetrant Testing: $75.00 $76.50 $78.03 B.4.3 Ultrasonic Testing: $75.00 $76.50 $78.03 (Escalation rate for Field Service Fees=2%per year) C. Other Fees 7/1/01-6/30/02 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30/04 CA Travel Time/Mileage Charge for Field $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Work and Test Specimen Pick-Up: C.2 Minimum Daily Call-Out Charge: 4 hours 4 hours 4 hours C.3 Soils Sampling with Truck- $225.001hour $229.50 $234.09 Mounted Auger: C.4 Licensed Senior Geotechnical En r. $123.00 $125.46 1 $127.97 (Escalation rates for items C.3 and CA=2%per year) Professional Services Agreement Status Report Materials Testing and Geological Engineering Services PSA-2001-33BD Total Project Budget: $80,000 FY 01/02, $130,000 FY-02/03, $100,000 FY-03/04 Consultant: Ninyo & Moore Start Date of Project: July 1, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 07/01/01 Original Materials testing, inspection and geotechnical PSA engineering for capital projects $80,000 N/A 07/01/02 1 Materials testing, inspection and geotechnical en ineering for capital projects $130,000 N/A Pending 2 Materials testing, inspection and geotechnical engine rin for capital projects $100,000 N/A CAFileNetWIP1PSA Status Report-Ninyo Moore-PSA2001-33BD.doc 02/24/03 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir.- 05/01/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item 13�f) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lud kctor of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR SURVEYING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-34BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush & Associates, to provide for Surveying Services, Specification No. PSA-2001-3413D, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $95,000 for each agreement ($285,000 total). SUMMARY • In May 2001 , the Board of Directors approved Professional Services Agreements (PSA) with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush & Associates for Fiscal Year (FY) 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $170,000 for each agreement ($510,000 total) for FY 2002/2003, and $95,000 for each agreement ($285,000 total) for FY 2003/2004. • Staff has determined that a second one-year renewal is required to successfully complete surveying services on capital projects during the next fiscal year (FY2003/2004). • The PSA amounts for each consultant will be used on an as-needed basis. Surveying services are budgeted on each capital project as required.- All services will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The PSA renewal amounts with each consultant for Fiscal Year 2003/2004 are listed in the table below. The amounts were Board-approved last year and derived by staff by considering average survey hours of past years, along with present survey fees and scheduled future capital projects. GAnlgloballAgenda Draft ReportsTDMR Survey Add#2.PSA-2001-34BD-050103.doc Revised: MOM Page 1 r r Consultant FY 03/04 Bell Land Surveying $95,000 MDS Consulting $95,000 Bush & Assoc. $95,000 TOTAL $285,000 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Surveying funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1 . Scope of Work 2. Fee Schedule for 2003/2004 3. PSA Status Report BP:ba G,lntglobaMgenda Draft Reports%PDC1AR Survey Add#2.P5A-2001-34BD-050103 doc Revised: 820/98 Page 2 ' ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK SURVEYING SERVICES FOR COLLECTIONS SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS TYPICAL TASKS PRELIMINARY ALIGNMENT: Provide preliminary stationing at intervals as required by District Engineer. CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT: Provide horizontal and vertical controls. Paint centerline of sewer for collections projects when requested by District Engineer. CONTRACTOR'S STAKING: Provide one set of offset line-and-grade stakes for pipeline, manholes, structures, etc. at 25 to 50-foot intervals, or as required by District Engineer along with cut sheets for contractor's use. PIPE CASINGS/TUNNELS: Provide one set of offset stakes for each pit location and one set for horizontal and vertical control in pits, with cut sheets. Provide line-and-grade checks inside casings. PIPELINE HEADING CHECK: Provide line-and-grade checks daily or as required by the District Engineer. STREET CENTERLINE TIES: Prior to construction, tie-out street centerline monumentation, and after construction, replace disturbed or destroyed street centerline ties. PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT: At the locations requested by the District, street cross sections will be surveyed prior to construction. For pavement replacement after construction, one set of paving and curb stakes will be provided at locations designated by the District. 1 r MISCELLANEOUS SURVEY: As requested by the District, provide boundary and topographic surveys, monument replacement, aerial control, settlement monitoring, and other miscellaneous items. Prepare base maps and exhibits using AutoCAD, latest version. REQUIREMENTS 1. Survey crew should be available within a 24 hour notice. 2. Survey crew should be experienced with tunnel and casing surveys. 3. Three copies of all survey notes shall be furnished to the District within 24 hours of survey or stakeout. 4. Surveyor's field personnel should be able to recognize survey errors or omissions on the contract drawings, survey or stakeout. 5. Survey party should consist of two or three persons per crew with a certified party chief. 6. Party chief or company representative should be available for the pre-construction meeting and other key meetings as the project progresses. 7. All supplies, such as, but not limited to, stakes, flagging, nails, spikes, ties, paint, etc. shall be included in the hourly rate for the survey party. 8. All surveyors must be adequately insured for liability and property damage, and a copy of the policy must be forwarded to OCSD. 9. Survey crew shall be able to provide proper traffic control in accordance with the W.A.T.C.H. Manual or as required by the governing agency when carrying out their functions and duties. 10.At least one member of the party should have a cell phone/pager or other form of communication so as to be in contact with the home office in the event the District requires immediate communication with the party during normal working hours. 11.Survey crew should be available for occasional night work (4:30 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) upon 24-hour advance notice. 12.Survey work shall be documented in English Standard Units and/or Metric Units, as required by the District. 2 a ti 4 13.Invoice shall be coded with District assigned project name and number for each work item. G:1wp.dtalengUOBS&CONTRACTS1Soils,Survey,E-Testing Contracts FY 01-041Survey\SURVEY SOW 2001 to 2004.doc 3 0 ATTACHMENT B SURVEY SERVICES: BELL LAND SURVEYING FEES 7/1/01 -6130/02 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1103-6/30/04 Uc. Surve or $100.00 '$102.00 $104.04 2-Party Crew $165.00 ;16&30 $171.67 3-Party Crew $225.00 $=.So $234.09 Office Calm $90.00 Sa1.80 $93.64 CAD Draftsperson $90.00 j8't $93.64 Min. hrs per Caliout 0 0 O Std. Rates SW.Rat1n Travel Charge Max.Esc. Rate 02/03 ' Max.Esc. Rate 03/04 2% PLS with robotic $150.00 i�5$:00 , $156.06 station Other Other Note:Escalation rates of 2%were used to calculate rates for FY 02(03,03104,as specified by Bell Professional Services Agreement Status Report Surveying Services PSA-2001-34BD Total Project Budget: $120,000 FY 01/02, $170,000 FY-02/03, $95,000 FY-03/04 Consultant: Bell Land Surveying Start Date of Project: July 1, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 07/01/01 Original Surveying Services for capital projects PSA $120,000 N/A 07/01/02 1 Surveying Services for capital projects $170,000 N/A Pending 2 Surveying Services for capital projects $95,000 N/A CAFHeNetWIPTSA Status Report-Bell-PSA2001-34BD.doc 02/24/03 a v ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK SURVEYING SERVICES FOR COLLECTIONS SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS TYPICAL TASKS PRELIMINARY ALIGNMENT: Provide preliminary stationing at intervals as required by District Engineer. CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT: Provide horizontal and vertical controls. Paint centerline of sewer for collections projects when requested by District Engineer. CONTRACTOR'S STAKING: Provide one set of offset line-and-grade stakes for pipeline, manholes, structures, etc. at 25 to 50-foot intervals, or as required by District Engineer along with cut sheets for contractor's use. PIPE CASINGS/TUNNELS: Provide one set of offset stakes for each pit location and one set for horizontal and vertical control in pits, with cut sheets. Provide line-and-grade checks inside casings. PIPELINE HEADING CHECK: Provide line-and-grade checks daily or as required by the District Engineer. STREET CENTERLINE TIES: Prior to construction, tie-out street centerline monumentation, and after construction, replace disturbed or destroyed street centerline ties. PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT: At the locations requested by the District, street cross sections will be surveyed prior to construction. For pavement replacement after construction, one set of paving and curb stakes will be provided at locations designated by the District. 1 0 4 MISCELLANEOUS SURVEY: As requested by the District, provide boundary and topographic surveys, monument replacement, aerial control, settlement monitoring, and other miscellaneous items. Prepare base maps and exhibits using AutoCAD, latest version. REQUIREMENTS 1. Survey crew should be available within a 24 hour notice. 2. Survey crew should be experienced with tunnel and casing surveys. 3. Three copies of all survey notes shall be furnished to the District within 24 hours of survey or stakeout. 4. Surveyor's field personnel should be able to recognize survey errors or omissions on the contract drawings, survey or stakeout. 5. Survey party should consist of two or three persons per crew with a certified party chief. 6. Party chief or company representative should be available for the pre-construction meeting and other key meetings as the project progresses. 7. All supplies, such as, but not limited to, stakes, flagging, nails, spikes, ties, paint, etc. shall be included in the hourly rate for the survey party. B. All surveyors must be adequately insured for liability and property damage, and a copy of the policy must be forwarded to OCSD. 9. Survey crew shall be able to provide proper traffic control in accordance with the W.A.T.C.H. Manual or as required by the governing agency when carrying out their functions and duties. 10.At least one member of the party should have a cell phone/pager or other form of communication so as to be in contact with the home office in the event the District requires immediate communication with the party during normal working hours. 11.Survey crew should be available for occasional night work (4:30 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) upon 24-hour advance notice. 12.Survey work shall be documented in English Standard Units and/or Metric Units, as required by the District. 2 a 13.Invoice shall be coded with District assigned project name and number for each work item. G:1wp.dtaleng\JOBS&CONTRACTS1Soils,Survey,E-Testing Contracts FY 01-041Survey\SURVEY SOW 2001 to 2004.doc 3 0 ATTACHMENT B SURVEY SERVICES: MDS CONSULTING FEES 7/1/01 -6/30/02 711/02-6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30104 Uc. Surveyor $90.00 $93.60 $97.34 2-Party Crew $150.00 $156.00 $162.24 3-Party Crew $180'00 $187.20 $194.69 Office Calcs $75.00 $78.00 $81.'12 CAD Draftsperson $60.00 62.40 $64.90 Min. hrs per Callout 2 2 2 Travel Charge $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Max.Esc. Rate 02103 40A Max.Esc.Rate 03/04 4% Other Other Other Note:Escalation rates of 4%were used to calculate rates for FY 02103,03/04,as specified by MDS O t' 4 Professional Services Agreement Status Report 'Surveying Services PSA-2001-34BD Total Project Budget: $120,000 FY 01/02, $170,000 FY-02/03, $95,000 FY-03/04 Consultant: MDS Consulting Start Date of Project: July 1, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 07/01/01 Original Surveying Services for capital projects PSA $120,000 N/A 07/01/02 1 Surveying Services for capital projects $170,000 N/A Pending 2 Surveying Services for capital projects $95,000 N/A C:\FileNetWIP\PSA Status Report-MDS-PSA2001-34M.doc 02/24/03 a ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK SURVEYING SERVICES FOR COLLECTIONS SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS TYPICAL TASKS PRELIMINARY ALIGNMENT: Provide preliminary stationing at intervals as required by District Engineer. CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT: Provide horizontal and vertical controls. Paint centerline of sewer for collections projects when requested by District Engineer. CONTRACTOR'S STAKING: Provide one set of offset line-and-grade stakes for pipeline, manholes, structures, etc. at 25 to 50-foot intervals, or as required by District Engineer along with cut sheets for contractor's use. PIPE CASINGS/TUNNELS: Provide one set of offset stakes for each pit location and one set for horizontal and vertical control in pits, with cut sheets. Provide line-and-grade checks inside casings. PIPELINE HEADING CHECK: Provide line-and-grade checks daily or as required by the District Engineer. STREET CENTERLINE TIES: Prior to construction, tie-out street centerline monumentation, and after construction, replace disturbed or destroyed street centerline ties. PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT: At the locations requested by the District, street cross sections will be surveyed prior to construction. For pavement replacement after construction, one set of paving and curb stakes will be provided at locations designated by the District. 1 P Q MISCELLANEOUS SURVEY: As requested by the District, provide boundary and topographic surveys, monument replacement, aerial control, settlement monitoring, and other miscellaneous items. Prepare base maps and exhibits using AutoCAD, latest version. REQUIREMENTS 1. Survey crew should be available within a 24 hour notice. 2. Survey crew should be experienced with tunnel and casing surveys. 3. Three copies of all survey notes shall be furnished to the District within 24 hours of survey or stakeout. 4. Surveyor's field personnel should be able to recognize survey errors or omissions on the contract drawings, survey or stakeout. 5. Survey party should consist of two or three persons per crew with a certified party chief. 6. Party chief or company representative should be available for the pre-construction meeting and other key meetings as the project progresses. 7. All supplies, such as, but not limited to, stakes, flagging, nails, spikes, ties, paint, etc. shall be included in the hourly rate for the survey party. 8. All surveyors must be adequately insured for liability and property damage, and a copy of the policy must be forwarded to OCSD. 9. Survey crew shall be able to provide proper traffic control in accordance with the W.A.T.C.H. Manual or as required by the governing agency when carrying out their functions and duties. 10.At least one member of the party should have a cell phone/pager or other form of communication so as to be in contact with the home office in the event the District requires immediate communication with the party during normal working hours. 11.Survey crew should be available for occasional night work (4:30 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) upon 24-hour advance notice. 12.Survey work shall be documented in English Standard Units and/or Metric Units, as required by the District. 2 4 d 13.Invoice shall be coded with District assigned project name and number for each work item. G:1wp.dtaleng\JOBS&CONTRACTS1Soils,Survey,E-Testing Contracts FY 01-041Survey\SURVEY SOW 2001 to 2004.doc 3 ATTACHMENT B SURVEY SERVICES: BUSH 8r ASSOCIATES FEES 7/l/01 -6/30/02 7/1/02-6130103 7/1103-6130/04 Uc. Sume or $74.00 $75.11 $76.24 2-Pa Crew $1 36'00 $138.04 $140.11 3-Party Crew $176.00 $178.64 $181.32 Office Calm $58.00 $5827 $58.75 CAD Drafts rson $52.00 $53.57 352.7$ 0.5 O.S, 0.5 Min. hrs per Callout Travel Charge $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Max.Esc. Rate 02t03 1. ' Max.Esc. Rate 03/04 1 Other Other Other Note:Escalation rates of 1.5°,6 were used to calculate rates for FY 02103,03/04,as specified by Bush Professional Services Agreement Status Report Surveying Services PSA-2001-34BD Total Project Budget: $120,000 FY 01/02, $170,000 FY-02/03, $95,000 FY-03/04 Consultant: Bush & Associates Start Date of Project: July 1, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 07/01/01 Original Surveying Services for capital projects PSA $120,000 N/A 07/01/02 1 Surveying Services for capital projects $170,000 N/A Pending 2 Surveying Services for capital projects $95,000 N/A CAFHeNetW MPSA Status Report-Bush-PSA2001-34BD doc 02/24/03 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 8d.of Dir. 05/01/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 13(9) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwi irector of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL ACCEPTANCE TESTING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-35BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Electro Test Inc., to provide Electrical Acceptance Testing Services, Specification No. PSA-2001-35BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $175,000. SUMMARY • In May 2001 , the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Electro Test Inc. for Fiscal Year (FY) 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $150,000 for FY 2002/2003, and $175,000 for FY 2003/2004. In June 2002, this agreement was renewed for the first of the two one-year periods, for an amount not to exceed $150,000 for FY2002/2003 • Staff has determined that a one-year renewal is required to successfully complete electrical acceptance testing on capital projects during the next fiscal year. • The PSA amount of $175,000 will be used on an as-needed basis. Electrical acceptance testing services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All testing will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The PSA renewal amount with Electro Test Inc. for Fiscal Year 2003/2004 is shown in the table below. The amount was Board-approved in June 2002 and derived by staff by considering average testing hours of past years, along with present electrical testing fees and scheduled future capital projects. Glntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\AR Electrical Add#2.PSA-2001-35BD-040303.doc Revised: 8/20198 Page 1 r % Consultant FY 20032/2004 Electro Test $175,000 TOTAL $175,000 BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. 0 Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Electrical testing funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Scope of Work 2. Fee Schedule for 2003/2004 3. PSA Status Report BP:ba GAntglobaRAgenda Draft Reports\PDCWR Electrical Add72.PSA-2001-35BD-040303.doc Revised: MOM Page 2 ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK For ELECTRICAL ACCEPTANCE TESTING SERVICES FOR COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS SPECIFICATION NO. PSA 2001-35BD REQUIREMENTS 1. Normal working hours will be anytime between Monday and Friday, 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Some testing situations might require longer hours and occasional night and weekend work. Field technicians shall be available upon 24-hour notice for all situations. 2. Invoices shall be coded with District assigned project title and job/contract number along with NETA test identification and a work description of the services provided. 3. All test results shall be clearly summarized in a standard report format and submitted to the District. 4. Equipment shall be calibrated prior to the work and not at District testing site. Calibration costs shall be included in total hourly rate as noted in the "GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, TASKS and PROPOSED FEES SCHEDULE". G:1wp.dtalengUOBS&CONTRACTS%Soils,Survey,E-Testing Contracts FY 01-041Electrical Testing0ectrica Testi-ng SOW 2001 to 2004.doc ATTACHMENT B l i ELECTRICAL TESTING: ELECTRO TEST,INC.FEES Tasks and Fee Schedule - All Inclusive Hourliv Rates - 7/1J01-SIMIX 71111 2-IN30103 7/1/03-6130104 7.1 Swltchgear and Switchboard Mspec6m and Assemblies slam $10925 $115.00 Test Proeedum 7.2.1.1 Dry Type Transformers $103.50 $10925 $115.00 7.2.1.2 Air-Coded Transformers $10&W $109.25 $116.00 7.2.2 Liquid-RIled Transformers $103 50 $109.26 $115.00 7.5.1.1 Low Voltage Air Switches $10S.50 - 009.26 $116.00 7.5.1.2 Medium VoMW Air slam $10925 $116.00 Switches 7.5.1.3 High Voltage Air Switches :lam $10925 $11&00 7.5.2 Medium Voltage Oil Switches $103.W $109.25 $116.00 7.6.1.1 Insulated Case/Molded Case ,:, $10925 $115.00 Circuit Breakers 7.6.1.2 Power Circuit Breakers 510350 °; ' $10925' $115.00 7.6.2.1 Medium Voltage Air ;103.5?:•.:.: $10925 $115,00 7.6.2.2 Medium Voltage Oil $11=30 $10925 $115.00 7.6.2.3 Medium Voltage Vacuum 5103.W: $10925 $115.00 7.6.2.4 Medium Voltage SF, $1014.50 $10925 $116.00 7.9 Protective Relays 411", $109.26 $116.00 7.10 Instrument Transformers s108.6D $109.26 $115.00 7.11 Metering $10925 $116.00 7.13 Grounding Systems 5403.50 $10925 $115.00 7.14 Ground-Fault Protection Wg.60 $10925 $715.00 Systems 7.15.1.1 AC Motors $10I 25 $116.00 7.15.1.2 DC Motors *103.50 $10925 $116.00 7.16.1.1 Low Voltage Motor Starters i103.50 $10926 $115.00 7.16.1.2 Medium Voltage Motor >i101W $10925 $116.00 Starters 7.18.1.1 Batteries i103.60 $10925 $115.00 7.19.1 Low voltage Surge $"3,50 $10926 $115.00 Protection Devices 7.19.2 Medium and High Voltage $103.60 $10926 $116,00 Surge Protection Devices raapectlon and 7.20.1 Capacitors $403.50 $10926 $115.00 Teat Piocadurr:s 7.22.1 Engine Generators $108.50 $10925 $116.00 7.22.2 Uninterruptible Power $10&60 $10025 $115.00 Systems 7.22.3 Automatic Transfer Switches $10&W $10925 $116.00 9.1 Thermographic Survey :103.50 $1 9925 $115.00 7/1/01-613Q10t2 7/1102-&30/03 7/1103-6f30/04 OLNmrFees Minimum Daily Call-Out Charge $414.00 $W.00 $460.00 Travel Time $103.60 $10925 $115.00 Mileage Charge $15.00 $1&00 $16.00 Oil Processing Lab Fees $100.00 $100.00 1 $100.00 Other Direct Cost --NWdaf ad- ORW Other Professional Services Agreement Status Report Electrical Acceptance Testing Services PSA-2001-35BD Total Project Budget: $70,000 FY 01/02, $150,000 FY-02/03, $175,000 FY-004 Consultant: Electro-Test, Inc. Start Date of Project: July 1, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 07/01/01 Original Electrical acceptance testing services for capital PSA projects $70,000 N/A 6/26/02 1 Electrical acceptance testing services for capital rojects. $150,000 N/A Pending 2 Electrical acceptance testing services for capital ro'ects. $175,000 N/A C:1FiWWWIPOSA Status Report-Electrotests-PSA2001-35BD.doc 02/24/03 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Rd.of Dir. 05101/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR MATERIALS TESTING AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2002-33BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Smith Emery GeoServices, to provide for Materials Testing, Inspection, and Geotechnical Engineering Service, Specification No. PSA-2002-33BD, for a one- year period for an amount not to exceed $100,000. SUMMARY • In June 2002, the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Smith Emery GeoServices for Fiscal Year (FY) 2002/2003, with the option to renew for one additional one-year period for an amount not to exceed $100,000 for FY 2003/2004. • Staff has determined that a one-year renewal is required to successfully complete materials testing, inspection, and geotechnical engineering services on capital projects during the next fiscal year. • The PSA amount for this consultant will be used on an as-needed basis. Testing services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All services will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The PSA renewal amount for this consultant for FY 2003/2004 is listed in the table below. This amount was Board approved in June 2002 and was derived by staff by considering average testing hours of past years, along with present testing and geotechnical fees and scheduled future capital projects. Consultant FY 2003/2004 Smith Emery GeoServices $100,000 TOTAL $100,000 G:\ntglobakAgenda Draft Reports\PDC\AR Soils Add#1.Smith-EmeryPSA-2002-33BD-050103.doc Revised: 8120/98 Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Materials testing and geotechnical services funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Scope of Work 2. Fee Schedule with Escalation Rates 2003/2004 3. PSA Status Report BP-ba GAntglobal'Agenda Draft Reports\PMAR Soils AddOI.Smith-EmeryPSA-2002.33BD-050103 doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 2 ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK For MATERIALS TESTING, INSPECTION, AND OTHER GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2002-33BD TYPICAL TASKS SOILS: Provide lab testing for maximum density, sieve analysis and soil identification. Field-test compacted soil using sandcone and nuclear density meter methods. Inspect compaction efforts by contractors to achieve specification-required densities. On a less frequent basis, be prepared to conduct soil sampling to depths as required by the District. CONCRETE/MASONRY: Provide concrete, mortar and grout cylinder compressive testing, masonry prism test, and shear test on brick cores. Pick up test specimen from construction sites. ASPHALT: Provide density field testing and core sample collection and lab testing. Inspect compaction efforts by contractors to achieve specification-required densities. METALS: Provide tensile strength lab testing. Provide field testing for welds and inspect welding operations. REQUIREMENTS 1. Field technician shall be available upon 24-hour notice. 2. Invoices shall be coded with District assigned project title and job or contract number along with an adequate work description of the services provided. 3. All test results shall be clearly summarized in a standard report format and submitted to the District. 1 4. Field technicians shall provide a detailed daily report for each day of field testing and observation. 5. Field technicians shall be available for occasional night work upon 24-hour advance notice. 6. Equipment that requires calibration shall be calibrated prior to the work. Calibration costs shall be included in the total hourly rate for field service fees. G:1wp.dtalengUOBS&CONTRACTS1Soils,Survey,E-Testing Contracts FY 01-041Soils\Soils SOW 2001 to 2004.doc 2 ATTACHMENT B SOILS, MATERIALS TESTING: SMITH-EMERY FEE SCHEDULE A. Lab Testing Fees All-inclusive Unit Prices Pick-Up,each 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30/04 A.I Soils A.1.1 Maximum Density: N/C $100.00 $100.00 A.1.2 Sieve Analysis: N/C $50.00 $50.00 A.1.3 Soil Identification: N/C $100.00 $100.00 A.2 Mason and Concrete A.2.1 Concrete Compressive Strength: $10.00 $14.00 $14A0 A.22 Shear Test on Brick Cores: $9.00 $50.00 S60A0 A.2.3 Mortar/Grout Compression Test: $10.00 $19.001$25.00 $19:00l"00 A.2.4 Masonry Prism Test: $39.00 $1".00 $1".00 A.3 Asphalt A.3.1 Core Sample Testing: $40.00 $35.00 05.00" A.4 Metals A.4.1 Tensile Strength: $19.00 $28.00 $28.00 (Escalation rate for Lab Testing Fees=0%) B. Field Service Fees Ali-Inclusive Hourly Rates 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1103 6130104 B.1 Soils B.1.1 Compaction Testing/inspection: Esc.Rate: 2% $55.50 $56.61 B.2 MasonjX and Concrete B.2.1 Test Specimen Pick-Up Unit Rate): see above see above B.3 .As halt B.3.1 Compaction Inspection/Density Test: Esc.Rate: Y% $65.50 $66.61 8.4 Metals B.4.1 Welding Inspection: Esc.Rate: 3% $65.00 $66.95 B.4.2 Dye Penetrant Testing: Esc.Rate: 3% $69.00 1 $71.07 B.4.3 Ultrasonic Testing: Esc.Rate: 3% $69.00 $71.07 C. Other Fees 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1103-6/30/04 CA Travel Time/Mileage Charge for Field included in fees included in Bees Work and Test Specimen Pick-Up: above above C.2 Minimum Daily Call-Out Charge: 2 hrs 2 hrs C.3 Soils Sampling with Truck- Esc. Rate: 0% $14.00/foot+ $114.00flbot+ Mounted Auger: $70.001hour $70.00/hour CA Licensed Senior Geotechnical En r. Esc. Rate: 2% $80.00/hour $81.60 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Materials Testing and Geological Engineering Services PSA-2002-33BD Total Project Budget: $130,000 FY-02/03, $100,000 FY-03/04 Consultant: Smith-Emery GeoServices Start Date of Project: July 1, 2002 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 07/01/02 Original Materials testing, inspection and geotechnical PSA engineering for capital projects $130,000 N/A Pending 1 Materials testing, inspection and geotechnical en ineering for capital projects $100,000 N/A CAFileNetW IPIPSA Status ReportSMith Emery-PSA2002-33BD.doc 02/24/03 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 5/01/03 5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC03-28 13 i Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Robyn Wilcox, Associate Engineer III SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK EVALUATION AND REMEDIATION AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-98 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Establish a budget in the amount of $262,800 for Underground Storage Tank Evaluation and Remediation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98; and (2) Approve Professional Services Agreement for Underground Storage Tank Evaluation and Remediation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98, with KOMEX, to provide testing and evaluation services, for an amount not to exceed $96,231. SUMMARY Background • The District is required to perform periodic tank integrity tests for any Underground Fuel Storage Tank (UST). The UST next to the Auto Shop at Plant No. 1 passed the test for the tank itself but failed the test for the appurtenant piping for the 2002 testing. • The Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) notified the Orange County Sanitation District (District) on June 28, 2002 that corrective action must be initiated at "the site of an unauthorized underground storage tank release." Preliminary testing indicates that the soil under the tank contains an excessive amount of a gasoline additive, MTBE, which will require the District to take remediative action after a thorough investigation. After preliminary testing, it is believed that the tank itself is intact, but that the appurtenant piping surrounding the tank is leaking. However, the extent of the contamination is not known at this point. The UST has been taken out of service pending its repair. • The District had an outside firm, Harding ESE, do a preliminary investigation and prepare a Scope of Work (SOW) through which an outside firm could more thoroughly analyze the extent of the contamination plume. Further environmental testing and evaluation is required to recommend a plan for remediation of the facilities and overall site. Giwp.dtalagenda\Board Agenda Repons0003 Board Agenda Reportsl0503\Item 13(1).Komex.do-- Revised: 8120198 Page 1 • r • On March 4, 2003, Staff received proposals from five firms as follows: KOMEX; Geomatrix; Miller Brooks Environmental, Inc.; Haley & Aldrich; and MACTEC (formerly Harding ESE). • Staff recommends the approval of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to KOMEX for a total amount not to exceed $96,231. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This project was originally proposed for inclusion under the small projects program in Engineering. However, after receipt of the proposals, it was learned that this project has exceeded the design cost limit for classification as a small project. Therefore, Staff requests that we budget this project as a Capital Improvement Project. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. F)� This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff is requesting that this project be budgeted as a Capital Improvement Project as it exceeds the definition of a small project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In March 2003, the District solicited proposals from the following consulting firms: ■ KOMEX ■ Geomatrix ■ Miller Brooks Environmental, Inc. ■ Haley & Aldrich ■ MACTEC (formerly Harding ESE) A Review Panel of five Staff independently reviewed the five proposals based on the following evaluation factors: ■ Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work ■ Plan for Managing and Performing the Work ■ Applicable Related Project Experience ■ Applicable Related Project Experience • Applicable Staff Qualifications ■ Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants ■ Proposed Schedule G:1wp.dta%agenda\Board Agenda Reports12003 Board Agenda Reports10503111em 13(i)Komex doc Revised. 8120I98 Page 2 a On March 26, 2003, the panel met to discuss their evaluations collectively. Based on the individual evaluations and.collective discussion, the panel agreed that KOMEX was the most qualified to perform the work for this study. The panel of five then opened the sealed dollar amounts for the proposals. All five proposing firms were fairly well grouped with respect to cost. The dollar amounts varied from a low of$73,499 to $122, 896. The proposed cost that KOMEX had submitted as part of their proposal was $96,231. After further review of KOMEX's estimate, Staff determined that KOMEX had a thorough understanding of the project and the costs that would be required to perform the work. Staff agreed that KOMEX's approach and qualifications were superior to that of all the others. Staff is recommending KOMEX to provide the UST Testing and Evaluation at Plant No. 1. See attachment"UST Testing and Evaluation at Plant No. 1 Ranking Summary" for additional information. The estimated construction cost is based on replacement of the appurtenant piping and limited remediation measures for this facility and its surrounding area. The full extent of the required remediation will not be known until the testing and evaluation has been completed. If the remediation is more extensive than originally thought, Staff may need to request additional monies at a later date. ALTERNATIVES None recognized. CEQA FINDINGS The requirements of CEQA have been reviewed for this project and the project has been found to be exempt under Section 15301. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. UST Testing and Evaluation at Plant No. 1 Ranking Summary Wwp.dtalagendalBoard Agenda Reports12003 Board Agenda ReporlsM0311tem 13(i).Komex.doc Revised: Bn0W Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK TESTING&EVALUATION AT PLANT NO.1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE Project Develo mem S S 9800 S 9.800S 9,800 S 9.800 Studies/PermittinQ S S 7.500 7.500 7.500 1 S 7,500 S 2,667 Consultant PSA S $ 100000 $ 100.000 $ S 96231 1$ 96.231 $ 2,279 Desion Staff S S 10000 10.000 S S 10,000 $ 10.000 Construction Contract S S 75,000 S 75.000 S Construction Administration $ S 5.0D0 S 5.000 S Construction Ins ection $ 10000 10.000 Contingency S $ 45,500 $ 45.500 PROJECT TOTAL S S 262,800 $ 262.800 123531 $ 123.531 $ 4,946 Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET S -IS S 262.800 1 1 S 1 $ 123.531 1 $ 123.531 1 S 4.946 RW:sa Eare.1711- ti UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INVESTIGATION AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-98 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: ■ KOMEX ■ Geomatrix ■ Miller Brooks Environmental, Inc ■ Haley & Aldrich ■ MACTEC The above five firms submitted responsive proposals on March 4, 2003. Proposals were reviewed in-house by a selected panel. The review panel consisted of five members from the Engineering and Environmental Compliance and Management Groups. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work -- Rates the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience— Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications —A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants— Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule -- Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. After reviewing and grading the proposals and conducting the interviews, the five consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results for the three firms: ■ KOMEX 2526 ■ Geomatrix 2420 ■ Miller Brooks Environmental, Inc. 2304 ■ Haley & Aldrich 2230 ■ MACTEC 2094 The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: KOMEX Collective scores placed KOMEX as the first choice in the overall rankings. Four of the five District panel members ranked KOMEX first in their rankings. One placed them third in their rankings. District Staff were impressed with KOMEX's proposal due to their estimated reduction of project duration, pretesting of VOC to maximize the eventual drill sites, thorough but concise explanation of project approach, and excellently written and presented proposal. Minor concerns included KOMEX's limited experience with the District staff and policies and their limited explanation of their use of subconsultants. However, with the strengths listed above, the panel felt that their overall approach would facilitate the design and subsequent construction of the Effluent Pump Station Annex. Geomatrix This Consultant did not provide an overly innovative approach to the scope of work. Though the panel was impressed with their detail on their project schedule and their explanation on their methodology to perform the pipe inspection, the panel thought it was somewhat wordy overall when compared to their level of proposed innovation. Overall panel ranking of Geomatrix placed them second out of the five proposals received. One of the panel ranked this firm first, two ranked it second, and two ranked it fourth overall. Miller Brooks Environmental, Inc. Miller Brooks Environmental, Inc. placed third collectively overall rankings. They did not rank any first place ranking by any of our district panel with two second place rankings, two third place rankings and a fifth place ranking. The project panel was impressed with the fact that they are a local firm (in Huntington Beach), presented a great deal of"tailored" experience for this scope 4 • of work, provided a well-detailed schedule, and provided a clear approach of how they proposed to perform the work for this project. The panel was mildly concerned with their lack of diversity within their project team and their limited creativity in writing the proposal. With no first place individual rankings, it was obvious that Miller Brooks Environmental, Inc. was not considered to be a frontrunner for this job. Haley & Aldrich The panel was impressed with Haley & Aldrich's global approach to the project scope, but was concerned that not enough detail was provided to convince the panel that they had a definite work plan in mind for this project. (i.e. they indicate that they could shorten the project schedule, but did not efficiently explain where they proposed to decrease the time from our proposed 24 week schedule.) The panel was concerned also with the fact that they did not cite much experience with the public sector and may not have had enough diversity in their listed experience. Haley & Aldrich did not have a first place individual panel ranking. One panel member ranked them at second, one at third, two at fourth, and one at fifth. Therefore, with the overall and individual rankings for this firm, they were not considered to be in the top three firms that proposed. MACTEC The reviewing panel for this project proposal believed that this firm was familiar with the project as they had prepared the original scope of work for which all firms proposed. In keeping, however, the panel was unsure that they had provided any additional thought to the scope and was somewhat limited in their approach to performance of this work. Their approach for investigation of the in- ground piping was limited and not nearly as detailed as most on the panel would have liked to see, though it did seem overly wordy in places. With no one on the panel placing them higher than a third place individual rating, they were not considered seriously for this job. Summary The District Staff who participated on this review panel was well impressed with the overall response that we received from all five candidates. The panel thought that overall, any one of these firms could have performed this scope adequately. However, the panel had chosen KOMEX as the frontrunner for this work. After ranking the proposals and interviews, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals as submitted by the five candidates. e Cost for this project proposal ranged from $73,499 (Miller Brooks Environmental, Inc.—the third place ranking) to $122,896 (Geomatrix—the second place ranking) a difference of$49,397. The fee proposed by the apparent favorite, KOMEX, was not extreme, but lay in the median of the proposed range. With four of the five panel members ranking KOMEX as the best qualified firm to perform the work, and KOMEX providing a reasonable fee proposal, the panel was further convinced that KOMEX had adequately estimated the amount of effort that was required to perform this scope of work . In keeping, this panel recommends that KOMEX be awarded this proposal. RW � _ A TABLE 1.0 Underground Storage Tank Evaluation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm KOMEX Geomatrix Miller Brooks Haley & MACTEC Environmental Aldrich Inc. Reviewer A 473 428 440 436 379 Reviewer B 524 498 468 389 447 Reviewer C 515 488 472 469 352 Reviewer D 495 541 525 423 412 Reviewer E 519 495 399 513 504 Total Score 2526 2420 2304 2230 2094 2900 Points Maximum Average Score 505 490 461 446 419 580 Points Maximum 100% Design 24 weeks 24 weeks <15 weeks <24 weeks 13 weeks Completion Proposed Weeks Proposed Not to $ 96,231 $ 122,896 $73,499 $ 88,749 $ 73,882 Exceed Fee PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 5/1/03 5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC03-29 13 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Planning Manager SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve partial payment of funds to the City of Garden Grove for Contract No. CP-0003 that was originally budgeted in FY2000-01 , in the amount of $84,852.98. SUMMARY • The Cooperative Projects Program (Program) provides funds to local agencies for projects that reduce or eliminate inflow and infiltration (1/1) in the sewer collection system. • The Program contracts are structured to reimburse agencies only after the completion of an entire project. • In the case of Garden Grove, there were three separate projects included under CP-0003 in FY2000-01 ; a Geographical Information System (GIS), Financial Plan, and Master Plan. Due to a lack of rainfall for determining 1/1 in the Garden Grove system, the preparation of the Master Plan portion has been delayed. • The Guidance Review Committee (GRC) recommends that the City of Garden Grove be reimbursed for the GIS and Financial Plan work that was completed in the amount of $84,852.98. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The requested reimbursement to the City of Garden Grove has already been approved by the Board in the FY2000-01 Program budget. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 159) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The total budget for the Program, Job No. J-73, is S142,675,600, and will be spent over the next 16 years on projects that reduce 1/1 throughout the Orange County Sanitation District. The attached Budget Information Table shows that the overall budget total remains unchanged. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Cooperative Projects Program (Program) was established in 1998 to realize the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Strategic Plan goal for inflow and infiltration (1/1) Reduction Plan. The Program is generally focused on reducing wet weather peak flows at the District's two wastewater treatment plants by 20 over a 20-year period. The District is about to embark on the fourth year of the Program. Contract No. CP-0003 was issued to the City of Garden Grove in FY2000-01 and included three separate projects: a Geographical Information System (GIS), Financial Plan, and Master Plan. The GIS and Financial Plan were completed in early 2002. The Master Plan was not done because the flow monitoring element could not be completed last winter due to lack of rain. The Board approved a time extension and additional funds to complete the Master Plan component of the project in September of 2002. The Program requires agencies to complete projects and submit invoices before being reimbursed by the District. Since CP-0003 consists of three independent projects, the Guidance Review Committee (GRC) believes that recommending partial payment of the two completed project components meets the intent of the Program funding requirements. ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the partial payment. Not approving the partial payment would mean the City of Garden Grove would not receive reimbursement for at least one year after completion of the GIS and Financial Plan. CEQA FINDINGS Local agencies are responsible for CEQA compliance. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table PKJo WntglobafWgenda Draft Repons\PDCU•73 AR 050103.doc Revised 8/20/01 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE COLLEGE AVENUE REPLACEMENT FORCE MAINS JOB NO.7-23-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK .AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(-.) Pr,IW Dove rllenl S 2000, $ 1.000 - 1.000 S 1.000 S 1.000 S t 0DO 100". StudieslParmitt' S $000 $ 5.000 5,000 $ 5.000 $ 5.000 $ 238 50. Consultant PSA I S 157,000 $ 1610001 S 161.000 $ 48.815 S 16.830 $ 65.645 $ 48800 74•. D..-Stall S 61,000 S 63000 63.000 S 63.000 S 63.000 $ 19200 3r ConstrucLon Contract S 1030,000 S 1003160DO S 1,031,000 $ Cons mstlon Adminlslmtlon $ 171000 $ 169.000 S 1694000 $ Constmction Ins on $ 141,000 S 1460000 S 146.000 S G... S 310.000 I S 310.000 I S 10.000 PROJECT TOTAL t 87Z000 S I886.000 E S 1.886,00011 16.830 $ ^1`" Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET - 1 877.000 S 1.886.000 $ 1 S 1.886.000 1'.7.815 $ 16.830 1$ 134.645 $ 69.238 51' L F:retie1W l0'Ip�apel Tn�k.:bOJ.wIDnRKL- EDl.�.00T)1;oM PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 05/01/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC03-30 13 k Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Brian Bingman, Project Manager SUBJECT: TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS JOB NO. P1-76 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation providing construction support services for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, for an additional amount of $2,082,459, increasing the total amount not to exceed $6,196.938. SUMMARY • A Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for engineering services with Black & Veatch Corporation (B&V) for the Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76 was approved by the Board of Directors in December 2000. • Addendum No. 1 to the PSA with B&V was approved by the Board of Directors in December 2001 when it was determined, after a detailed study. a new trickling filter facility would be a much more beneficial and cost effective option for the Orange County Sanitation District (District). • Addendum No. 1 did not include any construction support services. It was agreed by staff and consultant to address these services after design was complete to allow for a more accurate prediction of construction support services. • The key support items B&V will provide during the construction and commissioning phases will include the following: 1. Attend construction progress meetings 2. Review shop drawings and submittals 3. Assist in answering requests for information 4. Prepare "as-built" or record drawings once construction is complete 5. Review vendor testing to make sure it conforms to specifications 6. Conduct operations and maintenance training on new equipment 7. Prepare operations and maintenance manuals • The design was completed in January 2003 and a construction contract was awarded to J.R. Filanc Construction Company, Inc. at the March 2003 Board Meeting for an amount not to exceed $33,037,000. The construction contract has a duration of 1,000 calendar days. Gawp.dta\agendaSoard Agenda Repons\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503Utem 13(k).Black&Veatch.doc Revised: 8/10/98 Page 1 • This addendum also includes extra design work District directed consultant to complete at the end of the design phase. This extra work was required to maintain consistency with other projects currently in design and to reflect the latest changes in electrical and instrumentation requirements. The extra items include: 1. Prepare detailed design drawings of remote input/output panels 2. Prepare bid documents for "new' type of trickling filter distributor 3. Replace single pole relays with multiple pole relays 4. Rework grounding requirements to conform with new District standard S. Prepare bid documents for security. telephone, and public address system PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of $2.082,459 for design consultant construction support services is being requested. BUDGETIMPACT © This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 70) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The total budget estimate for the Rehabilitation of Trickling Filters and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, is $50,000,000. An amount of $2,082,459 will be moved from contingency. There is no change in the total project budget. See attached Budget Information Table for more information. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Black & Veatch Corporation (B&V) evaluated whether a complete rehabilitation of the existing facility or a new facility was more beneficial to the Orange County Sanitation District (District). A new facility was recommended at the conclusion of the evaluation and agreed upon by the Board of Directors on December 19. 2001. After demolition of the existing facilities, the new facility will include the following items: • Two new 166-foot diameter trickling filters, with 20 feet of plastic filter media • Two new 175-foot diameter clarifiers • A new Power Building No. 8 • Two effluent lines, one to the Groundwater Replenishment System and one to the interplant line that will convey the effluent to Plant No. 2 for disposal • Primary effluent design capacity of 30 million gallons per day • Design effluent quality of at least 20 mg/I for both Biochemical Oxygen Demand and Total Suspended Solids Near the conclusion of the design process, B&V was asked to complete a detailed review of the latest District design guidelines for all construction support items and prepare an addendum request for construction support services for the Construction. Commissioning, and Close Out phases. The attached Table 1, in the request from B&V, represents the diligence in their review G:\wp.dla\agenda\Board Agenda ReportsM03 Board Agenda Reports 0503\Item 13(k).BlackBVeatch.doc Revised: 8/10/98 Page 2 and includes hourly breakdowns for all required support items. Table 2 of their request is a summary table for the entire project Professional Services Agreement and includes all remaining costs including additional support services by subconsultants Spec Services and Water 3 Engineering. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the previously approved 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The 1999 Strategic Plan EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and the Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Request from Black & Veatch Corporation for Construction Support Services Addendum BEB:jo G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\Item 13(k).B1adc&Veatch.doc Revised: 8/10/98 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS JOB NO.P1-76 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(:) Plpect Development S 13.000 S 45.000 $ b 45.000 a2.000 S 42.000 $ 53.535 127'. StudievPemnng S 58.000 S 45.000 S S 45.000 a1.000 $ 41,000 S 50.000 122'. Consuttanl PSA b 1.200.000 $ 4,114.479 S 2082,459 $ 6.196.038 S 4.114.479 S 2.082.459 S 6,196.938 S 3,500.000 56-. D.s,gn Stan S 280.000 S 3069000 $ 308.0D0 s 280.000 $ 280,000 S 280.000 100'. Construction Contmct b 13.100.000 S 33.037.000 $ - $ 33.037.000 S 33,037.000 S 33,037.000 C—tnlct— Ad-nist.u- $ 969000 S 1753.000 $ - S 1,753.000 S 1.753000 S 1.753.000 Constnxt- In S 528.000 S 1.764.521 S S 1,764.521 1.764.521 S 1764.521 C-tmoe-y S 4.852000 S 8.933.000 S Q2 082459 $ 6.850.541 S PROJECT TOTAL S 21.000,000 S 50.000.000 b - $ 50,000.000 a1()32000 S 2.082.459 S 43,114,459 $ 3,883.535 Reimlwtsade C. PROJECT NET I S 21.000.000 S 50.0D0.000 S - S 50.000.000 S 41032,000 $ 2.082,459 $ 43.114459 1 S 3.883.535 1 9". FDI'S 004"14]45a Professional Services Agreement Status Report Rehabilitation of Trickling Filters and New Clarifiers Job No. P1-76 Total Project Budget: $50,000,000 Consultant: Black & Veatch Corporation Start Date of Project: January 3, 2001 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs 12/20/2000 Original PSA Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New $2,350,209 $2,350,209 Clarifiers Provide Additional Preliminary and Final 12/19/01 Addendum No. 1 Design Work for New Trickling Filter $1,764,270 $4,114,479 Facility Provide Construction Support Services for Pending Addendum No. 2 New Trickling Filter Facility $2,082,459 $6,196,938 EDMS: 003747469 BEB: BLACK& VEATCH CORPORATION MEMORANDUM Orange County Sanitation District B&V Project No. 99172 Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers B&V File A.2 OCSD Job No. P1-76 April 2, 2003 Addendum 2 To: Brian Bingman, OCSD Project Manager From: Ralph Eberts, Project Manager The purpose of this memorandum is to identify the additional cost associated with the remaining phases of the project (Bidding, Construction, and Startup, respectively). These additional costs include the increase in level of effort necessary to support the new facilities added to the project during the Design Phase. Our previous Request for Additional Funds, dated October 12, 2001, which identified these modifications, stated that cost adjustments subsequent to Design Phase would be identified at the conclusion of the Design Phase. This project is now at that milestone. In addition to new facilities, electrical and I&C design modifications were requested by the District during the Design Phase. This memorandum also identifies the costs associated with those modifications. 1.0 Impact of New Facilities and Electrical and I&C Modifications on Bid Phase, Construction Phase, and Startup Phase Costs The list below summarizes the new facilities added during of the Design Phase that have an impact on the level of effort required to meet the scope of Bid Phase, Construction Phase,and Startup Phase costs. o New trickling filters replaced what were formerly to be rehabilitated trickling filters. o A new trickling filter pump station was added. o A new Power Building 8 was added. o A primary effluent junction box was added. o A new primary effluent pipeline was added to bring effluent from Primary Clarifiers 1-5. o A new route to PEPS was added for trickling filter effluent. BLACK& VEATCH CORPORATION MEMORANDUM Page 2 Orange County Sanitation District B&V Project No. 99172 Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers B&V File A.2 Request for Additional Funds April 2, 2003 Adoption of Engineering Design Guidelines (EDG), Revision D during the Design Phase also has had an impact on our remaining services. o New requirements for Electronic Database Management (SAT, EID, CMMS) o New requirement for final coordination of the ETAP o New requirements for P&ID as-builts and update of existing P&IDs of processes adjoining our project The impact of these modifications is in three major areas. First,the addition of new facilities increased the level of effort for : • reviewing shop drawing submittals • responding to RFIs • providing structural observation • producing confirmed and as-built drawings • producing O&M manuals • conducting startup activities The second area of impact is the length of construction and startup which increased from two years to two years and nine months because of the new facilities. This results in a corresponding increase in the number of project meetings that must be attended. The third area of impact is the new level of effort necessary to fulfill the new requirements contained in the EDG,Revision D. Table 1 summarizes the total estimated level of effort for Bid Phase, Construction Phase, and Startup Phase,taking into account the modifications listed above. 2.0 Design Concept Modifications Resulting in Additional Design Costs A number of electrical and instrumentation design modifications were incorporated into the project as improvements after the respective portions of the drawings or specifications were completed. As much as they were improvements to the project,they represented additional efforts to make the modifications. 3.0 Resulting Costs The resulting additional costs requested are summarized in Table 3. They include additional Design Phase costs as well as additional costs for Bid Phase, Construction Phase,and Startup Phase. ♦ ,l TABLE 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS,PI.76 BID PHASE AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE LEVEL OF EFFORT Senior Total Classification Hourly Rates Project Project Senior Engineer Engineer IBC CADD CADD Labor Task Description Manager Engineer Engineer 10 U Engineer Engineer M r Op, Clerical Hours ProectM $262 Project Engineer $147 Senior Engineer $133 Engineer 111 $111 Task 5 OCSD BID PERIOD ASSISTANCE Engineer 11 S95 En'earl 587 5.1 Pre Bid Meeting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Senior 16C EngIneer 5160 CADD Mgr $106 5.2 Prepare Addenda 30 100 0 0 16 40 0 0 32 30 248 CADD OprS61 Clerical S82 5.3 Prepare Conformed Specs d Drawings 30 132 0 0 0 90 24 60 60 40 43f Nola:Hourly rates Include overhead but not profit. 5.4 Participate in Did Eva( 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Task 5 80 232 0 01 16 13(1 24 60 92 70 68 Task 7 Construction Phase Support 7.7 Attend Constr.Progress Migs 279 924 0 0 240 760 60 0 0 280 2.56 7.2 Review Shop Drawings and Submittals 16 697 1710 0 208 782 so 0 0 334 2.26 7.3 RFI Changeorders 40 $70 1SO 40 160 510 80 t0 140 s0 1,7 7 4 Prepare As-BuOts 46 281 0 0 112 866 0 436 52C 80 2.347 7.5 Review Vondar Tests 30 40 G 0 160 0 0 0 0 40 27 7,6 Programming and Databases 30 40 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 11 7.7 Structural Observation 30 40 300 0 0 C 0 0 0 80 45 Subtotal Task 7 471 2.592 62C 401 Sao 2,93 220 4461 Wol 944 9.8,11 Task 6 Startup Assistance and Training 8.1 Startup Assistance 6 204 0 0 260 0 40 0 0 10 58 8.2 Conduct Training 20 80 0• 1,0m 0 143 40 0 0 100 1.30 8.3 Prepare O&M Manuals and SOP 28 200 01 1.728 0 224 40 0 0 490 2.71 8.4 Maintain Equipment and Marts Database See Task 7.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Task 8 561 484 0 2.720 260 367 120 0 0 660 4,67 Total 587 3.308 620' 2,768 1.158 3,435 364 508 52 7 1.674 15,17 ote:Subconsultant hours are not included. Assum Ions I. Construction and startup combined has a duration of 1000 calendar days. 2. All surveying and all geotechnical work will be handled by the District. 3. The District will conduct all inspections. 4. District inspectors will be responsible for reviewing,correcting Contractor errors end omissions,and Initialling as-buills on weekly basis. 5. There are 325 design drawings and 100 Imp drawings at the ttme of bidding. it Is assumed that 100 ed rilional"diagrams and 100 additional PAID drawings will be generated during construction. 6. There are 600 submittals(300 InBal submittals and 300 fe-submnals)estimated a14 lours apiece. 7. Thera are 300 RFrs estimated at 4 tours apiece and 50 change orders W 8 hours aple". 8. For Training In Task 8.2.26 pieces of equipment are Included In the tralning;B6V w0 attend vendor ImIning for 10 pieces of equipment. 9. District w81 furnish copies of a0 inspector and other District staff field notes.Intent Is to use these for OC or Contractor's as-built documentation. -- -- -- --•---- -11—r.e,..,n,l- nnly al efn 25%.5O%-75%.and 100%construction milestones. t TABLE 2 REQUESTED ADDITIONAL FEES' eques e Existing Addendum Agreement 2 Total Engineering Services(direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 166%)Not to exceed $2,552,248 $1,344,180 $3,896,428 Subconsultant Fees and Costs, Not to Exceed $1,131,716 $671,070 $1,802,786 Profit(Addendum 2 at 5%) $194,992 $67,209 $262,201 Direct Costs, of to xcee $235,523 $0 $235,523 Total, Not to Exceed $4,114,479 $2,082,459 $6,196,938 ` Includes additional design fee of$300,647 for electrical/I&C subcontractor. PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 05/01/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC03-31 13 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Matthew P. Smith, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: INTEGRATED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Program Management Consultants, a joint venture of Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. and CH2M Hill, Inc., authorizing: (1) An increase to the five-year agreement in the amount of S35,000,000, for a total amount not to exceed $50,000,000; (2) An increase for the first year of the agreement for an additional amount of $449,934, increasing the total amount not to exceed $4,385,217 for FY2002/03; and (3) Establish an amount not to exceed $12,484,750 for year two of the contract, FY2003/04. SUMMARY • In August 2002, the Planning, Design and Construction Committee (PDC) and Board of Directors awarded a five-year, $15 Million Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Integrated Program Management Consultants (IPMC) to help Orange County Sanitation District (District) manage the increase in capital project work that is estimated to last up to ten years. • The District's Board of Directors had previously adopted a staffing plan which included the Engineering Department's plan to hire up to 44 Limited-Term Employees as the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) ramps up. Based on Staff's experience with Limited-Term Employees, as well as interviews with Engineering Consultants and other Public Agencies with similar size CIPs, Staff recommended using a Program Management Consultant to fulfill our highly specialized and temporary staffing needs. A "Program" approach, as proposed to hiring individuals, offers a single point of responsibility, vast and relatively immediate resources, consistency, standardization, flexibility, specialized talent, an integrated team approach, and skills transfer to Staff. • At that time, Staff informed the Board of Directors that in light of the recent decision to pursue higher treatment levels, there would be a large increase in capital project work and, consequently the $15 Million Integrated Program Management Consultant contract would increase significantly. Staff has spent the last nine months evaluating the District's CIP, including the higher level of treatment efforts. This includes preparation of a prioritized and validated CIP which includes 132 projects. Page 1 Eight of the 132 projects are required to bring the Orange County Sanitation District (District) to 100% secondary treatment levels. These eight projects total approximately $583 Million. The total cost for the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) approaches $2.4 Billion. The District's yearly CIP workload will more than double for the next several years. • Based on this detailed planning and resource forecasting effort, 46 Integrated Program Management Consultant (IPMC) staff will be required to complete next fiscal year's capital improvement work. The Staff will be phased in as required over the next fiscal year and include: 1) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT IPMC has provided four (4) management level staff to assist the District in developing the program management systems. This is ongoing and will require a continuing effort through the coming Fiscal Year. It is anticipated that one or more of these key staff will complete their contributions to the program within the upcoming year as systems and processes are developed and integrated into the Districts business model. Apart from the necessity to manage IPMC staff performance, these four key staff will be providing much of the task specific work that must be addressed and that is described in more detail below. In addition. one Administrative Assistant will be provided. (5 people) S 1,621,801 2) PROJECT MANAGERS There will be 54 projects underway in the next year. These range in size from less than S1 Million to S260 Million. Of these projects, eight are for the Full Secondary program adopted by the Board of Directors in 2002. The District has analyzed the manpower requirements on a project by project basis and determined that a workload of two to eight projects per Project Manager (PM) is an acceptable workload depending on the size and complexity of the project. Six PM's are needed to supplement the seven District PM's. In addition. approximately 35 small projects will be managed. This requires two PM's and a Computer Aided Design operator from the IPMC. Staff plans to hire some additions/permanent PM's when feasible. A base level of seven District PM's is insufficient. (9 people) S2,266,249 3) PROJECT ENGINEERS Project engineers support the PM's and play an important role throughout all phases of a project. They must provide technical coordination, manage design efforts and review design deliverables. The appropriate workload determined by the District is approximately that of the PM's. IPMC will provide seven PE's to supplement the five District staff. (7 people) $1,843,684 Page 2 c 4) RESIDENT ENGINEERS The District has eight Resident Engineers (RE) overseeing construction activities. There will be 21 projects under construction with a total constructed value of $75 Million to place in FY2003/04. Integrated Program Management Consultants (IPMC) will provide five RE's and a junior level engineer to supplement Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff. Each RE (including the District's) will be responsible for approximately$5.8 Million of the work. This gross ratio of projects to RE's is approximately 2.8% of construction cost. This is less than industry standards and is considered the minimum necessary to ensure management of the construction work. (6 people) $1,316,471 5) INSPECTORS Integrated Program Management Consultant (IPMC) will provide six inspectors and one submittal clerk to supplement the fifteen Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff. These inspectors will be brought in over the year as needed. This will provide a level of coverage of one project per FTE inspector. This gross ratio of projects to inspectors is approximately 3.7% of constructed value for FY2003-04 and is less than industry standards. (7 people) $856,461 6) PROGRAM CONTROLS The District is developing a sophisticated and comprehensive program controls system to track costs and schedules. In addition, the District adopted Microsoft Project Planner Enterprise for scheduling, and a detailed work breakdown structure for project management. IPMC will provide the control staff to develop, startup, maintain and train District staff on the use of this management tool. Providing status reports, quality assurance of data used in the system and support to the PM's will require three dedicated staff from IPMC to supplement the two the District will allocate to this part of the management process. Field schedulers are needed to ensure contractors provide accurate schedules and keep them current (a vital element in any claims avoidance program). Field schedulers review the contractor's initial schedule submittal and the schedule of values. This initial effort will take up to 30 days. Thereafter, monthly updates are required from the contractors, which must also be reviewed. Progress claimed by the contractor's must be reviewed against the schedule plan each month for payment and any request for additional time through change orders must be analyzed. On average, a scheduler can expect to handle five projects at one time. Three field schedulers will be provided by IPMC to handle the construction workload. This is less than may be required but is considered the minimal number to get started in FY2003/04. These three will be brought in over the year as needed. Page 3 A cost estimator will be provided by Integrated Program Management Consultants (IPMC) to prepare estimates for change orders and help negotiate changes during construction. The estimator has already been asked to provide pricing for several change orders to assist ongoing negotiations. (7 people) $1,601,681 7) TECHNICAL SUPPORT STAFF FOR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) AND ENGINEERING O & M must devote Staff to supporting the projects in all phases. O&M is adding Staff, but will need one O&M support person from IPMC. Similarly, the available electrical and Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) engineering Staff cannot adequately support the increased project workload. IPMC will provide two electrical engineers and two I&C engineers, as needed, to augment the engineering Staff during design and for construction support. (5 People) $770,085 8) PROGRAM CONTROLS SYSTEM (PCS) PROGRAMMING IPMC completed a master implementation plan to develop a controls system for the Capital Improvement Project (CIP). The Program Control System will be completed in the upcoming fiscal year. IPMC expertise is providing the programming to integrate the Orange County Sanitation Districts (District) FIS, Microsoft Project Planner and Expedition tools into a comprehensive system for managing costs and schedules of all the projects and of the program as a whole. This will be a legacy system for the District for many years into the future. This continues the work started in this past year to develop the requirements and the plan for this system. $571,175 9) MISCELLANEOUS TECHNICAL SUPPORWHOME OFFICE SUPPORT IPMC will provide technical support in a number of areas to support the program. These tasks will be as authorized by the Director of Engineering when required. Technical support may include: Value Engineering Studies Design review support Concept studies to define project needs and scope Validation of the CIP for FY2004/05 Design Standards Review Review Design Contract Format Review Construction Contract Format Asset Management related studies Miscellaneous Project studies, evaluations and analysis Training and Technology Transfer Communications Plans Project Controls Page 4 4- Risk Plans/Management Safety Claims Avoidance Inspection Home Office Support Accounting Contracts Miscellaneous Technical Support 1 337143 (46 people plus programming and miscellaneous technical support) Sub-Total $12,184,750 Other Direct Costs $ 300,000 Total $12,484,750 • Construction expenditures for the five year period FY2002-03 through FY2006-07 are expected to be about $650 million. Additionally, for the five year term of the IPMC contract, total Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff costs for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are approximately$125 million. Integrated Program Management Consultants (IPMC) five year$50 million Professional Services Agreement represents about 40% of this amount with District staff representing the remaining $75 million. • In future Fiscal Years the required IPMC staff is expected to remain approximately at the same level. This estimate brings the total five year estimated cost for IPMC to approximately $50 Million. This is an increase of $35 Million over the current$15 Million authorized in the District's contract with Integrated Program Management Consultants (IPMC). • The increase in Fiscal Year 2002/03's budget of $449,934 is due to increased IPMC provided staff levels earlier than anticipated. Specifically, five project engineers and three resident engineers were retained to support the full secondary efforts as well as on-going construction projects. • At the May Planning, Design and Construction Committee meeting, questions were posed concerning whether any conflict of interest existed for Parsons Engineering in view of its current Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with the District, relating to Asset Management. The office of the General Counsel has reviewed both agreements, including the Scope of Work, and has concluded that no conflict exists. There is an existing five year Agreement between IPMC (A joint venture of Parsons and CH2MHill) however the proposed Asset Management Agreement has yet to be approved by the Board of Directors. The question of a conflict of interest was raised to address a potential conflict should an asset management Agreement be entered into with Parsons. Part of the on-going validation of the District's CIP includes condition assessments, and prioritization of potential projects, which is a form of Asset Management. Staff points this out to make the Board of Directors aware that the current PSA with IPMC includes some work Page 5 that is considered Asset Management. This work is necessary to the validation process and amounts to approximately $200,000 for FY 03/04. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The costs for IPMC management, overall planning efforts, cost controls and reporting and skills transfer will be proportionately charged to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects. A budget breakdown is not included because the funding for this effort will come from individual project budgets. Each Fiscal Year, as projects are planned, scheduled, budgeted, and resource needs identified, a projected cost will be presented to the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee for approval. Quarterly updates on the entire program will also be provided. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In April 2002, a Request for Qualifications was sent to 37 consulting firms in an effort to find a qualified Program Management Consultant. Six Statement of Qualifications were received in May 2002, from the following firms: Fluor Corporation, Earthtech, Montgomery Watson Harza, Black & Veatch Corporation, Jacobs, Inc., and Integrated Program Management Consultants (IPMC). IMPC is a joint venture of CH2MHil, Inc. and Parsons. Staff determined that five of the six firms should continue in the selection process and receive a Request for Proposal. Subsequently, one firm requested they not be considered further in the selection process. In July 2002, all four of the remaining firms were interviewed by a five-member panel consisting of Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Management staff from Engineering and Operations and Maintenance. Based on this process as well as a consideration of fees, staff recommended selection of IPMC. ALTERNATIVES Increase District's permanent Staff - This option would require a lengthy process and extensive effort to recruit, hire, train and make productive a large number of new employees. It is also anticipated that staffing needs will vary in future years. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS PSA Status Report MS:jo:sa G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0501Item 13(1),IPMC.doc Page 6 Professional Services Agreement Status Report For INTEGRATED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Total Project Budget: $15,000,000 Consultant: Integrated Program Management Consultants Start Date of Project: August 28, 2002 Date Amendment Description Cost AccumulatedCosts 8/28/02 Original PSA Program Management Services $3,935,274 $3,935,274 An increase to the five-year agreement in the amount of $35Million Pending 1 An increase for the first year of the agreement for an $449,943 additional amount of $449,934 Establish an amount not to exceed $12,484,753 for year two of the contract, FY2003/2004. $12,484,750 $16,869,967 MS:sa G:\wp.dta\eng\IPMC\IPMC PSA Status Report 2003.doc G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\Item 13(I).i.doc 05/20/03 Revised 05/14/98 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 5/1/03 5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC03-32 13(m) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-29 — SHEA HOMES ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition requesting annexation of 4.88 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Bolsa Chica Avenue and Los Patos Avenue, bordering the East Garden Grove Winterburg channel in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-08, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29 — Shea Homes Annexation). SUMMARY • This item was pulled from the Consent Calendar at the April 23, 2003 regular Board Meeting and was deferred to the May 1 , 2003 PDC Committee for further consideration. • The Directors requested that the item be sent to the PDC Committee for further consideration following public comments from four individuals who opposed the annexation. The issues they raised are primarily related to land use decisions which are not within the District's authority. • OCSD received a request from Ron Metzler who represents Shea Homes L.P. (Shea) to annex 4.88 acres to OCSD. This annexation contains two (2) parcels, Assessor Parcel Nos. 110-016-23 and 110-016-19 annexing together with one landowner. • The 4.88 acres proposed for annexation to OCSD is part of a larger proposed residential development that also encompasses about 45 acres within the City of Huntington Beach, including 163 new homes. Shea proposes to construct Eight (8) single family homes in the 4.88 acres proposed for annexation to OCSD. • Shea has also petitioned the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for annexation to the City of Huntington Beach (City). LAFCO will process the landowner's requests to annex to the City and OCSD concurrently. • Following annexation to OCSD and the City, Shea will pay the OCSD sanitary sewer service charges to the City when building permits are issued. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties. The Board of Directors approved this action and it became effective March 14, 1989. Under this Tax Exchange, OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of $30,027.00 includes the following: LAFCO Processing Fee $ 1,150.00 OCSD Processing Fee 500.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee 300.00 CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee 43.00 OCSD Annexation Acreage Fee $27,984.00 TOTAL ANNEXATION FEE $30,027.00 BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This item is being forwarded to the PDC Committee after being pulled from the Consent Calendar at the April 23, 2003 Board Meeting. Four members of the public addressed the Board requesting that the Board deny the proposed annexation of 4.88 acres owned by Shea Homes. L.P. (Shea). Public comments included: • Delay initiation of the proposed annexation until the California Coastal Commission has acted to either approve or deny development on the area to be annexed to OCSD. • Portions of the proposed development could be designated as wetlands, and the area is adjacent to the Bolsa Chica wetland. • The proposed annexation area does not necessarily qualify as an unincorporated "island" because it is over 80% bounded by unincorporated County lands. • The April 23, 2003 Board Agenda Report did not discuss the complexities of the proposed development and the opposition to the development. • OCSD should consider purchasing the entire 50 acres proposed for development by Shea, and use the land for construction of a natural system to treat urban runoff from the Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel. Staff's recommended action for the Board of Directors is to authorize initiation of annexation of 4.88 acres of unincorporated territory to OCSD. The next step following Revised: 8/20/01 Page 2 " this authorization is for the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to consider approval of the OCSD annexation concurrent with approval of annexation into the City. The City of Huntington Beach (City) has approved annexation of the 4.88 acres into the City. The comments related to Coastal Commission approval and opposition to the development are land use planning issues that are not within the decision making authority of OCSD. Annexation of the subject territory into OCSD does not constitute approval of the development by OCSD. The territory could be annexed to OCSD regardless of whether it is developed. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption will be filed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map RLC:sa GAntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\Shea Homes Annexaiion.doc Revised: 8/20101 Page 3 a EXHIBIT"A" OCSD—29 SHEA HOMES REORGANIZATION(RO 03-01) TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT A parcel of land in the County of Orange, State of California, being all of Parcels B and C and a portion of Parcel A of the land described in the deed recorded September 19, 1996, as Instrument No. 19960479182 of Official Records of said County, said parcel of land being described as follows: COMMENCING at Orange County Surveyor's Horizontal Control Station GPS No. "5096", having a coordinate value (U.S. Survey Feet) of North 2208592.387 and East 6016934.826 based upon the California Coordinate System (CCS83), Zone VI 1983 NAD (1991.35 epoch O.C.S. GPS adjustment) as shown on Record of Survey 92-1031, filed in Book 150, pages 1 through 9, inclusive, of Record of Surveys in the Office of the County Recorder of said Orange County; Thence South 10°45'25" East, 2494.02 feet to an angle point in the Westerly boundary of the Orange County Sanitation District per Annexation No. 15 to Orange County Sanitation District No. 11, said point being at the Northwesterly terminus of the course shown on said Annexation as "N45°35'11"W, 4026.59'", and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along said Annexation boundary South 45*35'11" East 326.03 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of Orange County Flood Control District Parcel No. C5-101, 196.00 feet wide, per the deed recorded in Book 7181, Page 748 of said Official Records; Thence leaving said annexation boundary and along said Northerly right-of-way line South 63040'29"West 794.05 feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel C; Thence along the Northwesterly boundary of said Parcel C the following courses: North j 26019'31" West 95.04 feet, North 18007'10" East 231.15 feet, North 29037'51" East 37.58 feet, North 57036'54" East 150.89 feet, North 44°49'13" East 172.30 feet and North 32053'40" East 47.24 feet to the Northerly line of Parcel 7 of Corporation Quitclaim Deed recorded February 22, 1974 in Book 1180, page 287 of said Official Records; March 13, 2003 WO No.0061-15377X Page 1 of 2 H&A Legal No 5654 By B.Hunsaker Checked By J.Stablein r EXHIBIT"A" v OCSD—29 SHEA HOMES REORGANIZATION (RO 03-01) TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Thence continuing along said Parcel C boundary and along the boundary of said Parcel B, and said Northerly line of Parcel 7, North 89°58'29" East 155.96 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. The hereinabove describe parcel of land containing 4.884 Acres, more or less. Unless otherwise noted, all bearings and distances in this description are ground based on the California Coordinate System, (CCS83) Zone VI NAD 1983 (1991.35 epoch O.C.S. GPS Adjustment).To obtain grid distance,multiply ground distance by 0.99997623. As shown on Exhibit"B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. This proposal was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. \.AND Sv�GF Bruce F. o _► Hunsaker -56 Exp.•12131/04 Bruce Hunsaker, L.S. 5921 No.5921 My License Expires: December 3l;2004 �'�,9� Date: � 1�j 2:T1 OF This proposal does meet the approval of the Orange County Surveyor's Office. Dated this Llj7tay of tAA 2003. C o L By: Jo , County Surveyor,L.S. 4408 O M cense Expires: 9/30/05 j EXP.9130/05 M No.4408 �qr�OF CAS-1�� March 13, 2003 WO No. 0061-15377X Page 2 of 2 H&A Legal No 5654 By B.Hunsaker Checked By J.Stablein EXHIBIT °B° SHEET I OF I KEET EDRtGER AYE. SCAOCSD - 29 SHEA HOMES REORGANIZATION wARHER AVE. LEGEND (RO 03-01) TO THE ORANGE COUNTY ANNEXATION BOUNDARY—AREA o 4.884 ACRES WARNER AVE, !� 9� SANITATION DISTRICT DENTICAL P(NNTS \ �rEXISTING GRANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PER ANNEXATION NO 15 TO THE COUNTY SANITATION GPS 5096 aar DISTRICT NO. 11. 367 E 60116 342826 Cjt \ ( ) INDICATES RECORD DATA PER ANNEXATION NO,15 PER RECORDS ON FILE AT THE m ,.c• rjl, TO THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.It. 91E , ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFRCE VICINITY P A a \r NOT TO SCALE `,VS m g�•z w G n \' . THIS PROPOSAL WAS PREPARED BY ME r � `N _ l, N \��• OR UNDER MY DIRECTION. J 10 ,,,�'� Q \ r; ;%e- � Bnn F.Hunse 9A ' �Q QIP' EqL 12131Ax N lY LINE PCL 7 I ;:,J• �{$Epp BRU F..HUNSAKER, L.S. 5921 1180/257 0R. • \ MY LICENSE EXPIRES 12/31/04 ��No.592t \� ,-15596�-E, __--, :c= ; "r ��c;`� _ t•.... OF c GRAPHIC SCALD 2 p32g3Wi~ 0 mo 30D 400 sm 3Al AT' ,�• ?S' ,,�t ��l '� 11"3/03 Lam. "�ti� r, 4► 0`� g��clA DATE �.�;$y a , � �1' �q •.Gs��5� �.�o. \ ( IN FEET ) I inch 200 ft. N29'37558 1wQ� •�R+•J t�,1 nI,�1 \ THIS PROPOSAL DOES MEET THE APPROVAL OF THE \5 G V. \ ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE. �P � DATED THIS DAY OF }2003. 2 s sw CON. g t l C �Py �• U EXP.9rJ0A5 JOH AS, NTY4sagiV14-) * Na•4408 * e1 y L 08 MY LICENSE EXPIRES 9/30/05 �9 mm �ATuu STAIE?IENt: , OFCP COOtOWATES SHOW ARE BASE°ON THE CAUFORHIA COO MATE SYSTEM I (CCS83).ZONE N,1983 NAD.(1991.35 EPOCH OCS CPS ADJUSTMENT). H U N S A K E R & ASSOCIATES. S STANCES SHOYNOBTAIN HEREON ARE ES MUL DISTANCES,BY A UNLESS OTHERWISE FACTOR SHOWN,TO OBTAIN GRID DISTANCES MULTIPLY 8Y A COMBINED FACTOR OF CPS 5078 0.99997623 N 2204445.745 1 R V I N E , I N C E 6019156.193 PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING DATE:01/20/03 DWG By.BFH ORANGE��RECORDS ss�°NVEYaoWs FILEACMCE Three Hughes • Irvine, CA 92618 ■ PH:(949)583-1010 ■ FX:(949)583.0759 REV.:02/06/03 CK'd By.JKS I:\MWD—SHEA\Id\5654\LAFCO—OCSD.dwg r r� 9 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 4/3/03 5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC03-16 13(n) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Kathy Millea, Engineer SUBJECT: SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADING FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-60 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, with JW Contracting Corporation, authorizing an addition of S199,346, increasing the total contract amount to $10,692,025. SUMMARY Background • Job No. P2-60 provides for the construction of a new solids storage and truck loading facility at Plant No. 2. The new facility consists of two silos, each silo having a 600 cubic yard capacity. • Carollo Engineers prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to JW Contracting Corporation on May 10, 2000. • Change Order No. 3 includes six (6) items of added work to Job No. P2-60. There is one omission associated with this change order. The contract includes liquidated damages at $1000 per day and no bonus provisions. • Presently the project is 9 months behind schedule. Although contract time extensions have been requested, final negotiations have not been finalized. The District has withheld anticipated liquidated damages which will continue to accrue pending the submission of the required time extension justification. • This Change Order was previously approved at the April PDC Committee Meeting. Revised: 8/10/98 Page 1 Contract Schedule Contract Start Date May 10, 2000 Original Contract Completion Date July 8, 2002 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3 Current Contract Completion Date July 25, 2002 Projected Final Completion Date August 14, 2003 Anticipated Liquidated Damages to Date 221 Calendar Days Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 Change Order No. 2 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Electrical panel Upgrades for $14,208 0 Design Change CCP010 and FCP017 2 Additional Emergency Stop Buttons $ 4,156 0 Changed Condition 3 Electrical Connections for Pump $35,783 0 Omission/Changed E ui ment Condition 4 Revised Motor Control Standards $61 ,613 0 Design Change 5 UPS and Raceway Revisions $40,303 0 Omission 6 Exhaust Duct and Conduit $43,283 0 Design Change Modifications at Truck Loading Bays TOTAL $199,346 0 Items 3, 4 and 5 involve potential time extensions to the contract. The impact to the project could not be determined at this time. If necessary, justified contract time extensions for these items will be included in a future Change Order. Job Completion • The Contract is now 98 complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 10,428,440.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 64,239.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 199.346.00 Change Orders to Date $ 263,585.00 Percentage Increase to Date 2.53% Amended Contract Price $ 10,692,025.00 Revised: 8/10198 Page 2 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 81, Solids Handling & Digestion, FY 2002-03 Budget) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff requests a reallocation of funds in the amount of $199,346 from the contingency budget to the construction contract budget. There is no increase in the total project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS Additional solids storage facilities were addressed in the 1989 Master Plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order KM:dm Revised: 811OW Page 3 I P d f CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No.2 Job No.P2-60 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 5/10/2000 $10,428,440 $10,428,440 0.00 790 790 CO NO.1' 6/27/2002 $1,762 $10,430,202 0.02% 17 807 CO NO.2' 2/24/2003 $62,477 $10,490,917 0.06% 0 807 CiOs ��'3'' r"�`P8[HIrl �w � ..« �' ✓T n as�r ,CCFO lot s.Q et2LY iitf 4 a.,.xz?-.,ice 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 s Page 1 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: JW Contracting Corporation C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 3, 2003 Job: Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-60 Consultant: Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add) (D9dUGt) $199,346.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — ELECTRICAL PANEL UPGRADES FOR CCP010 AND FCP017 This item is for labor, material, and equipment to upgrade electrical panels CCP010 AND FCP017 to comply with the revised OCSD control panel standards. The majority of the added costs included in this item were due to upgrading from a Nema 12 to a Nema 4X stainless steel enclosure for FCP017. Other changes included upgrades from the specified outdated Modicon PLC input and output cards to the latest models, terminal blocks that have higher output ratings (2 amp instead of 0.5 amp), fused terminal blocks (for additional circuit and equipment protection) instead of unf used terminal blocks, and larger wireways and panel size to eliminate congestion and accommodate future additions. This work was not included in the Contract Documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 48 of the General Requirements. Reference Field Change Order No. 22 and JW Contracting's letter dated May 3, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $14,208.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—ADDITIONAL EMERGENCY STOP BUTTONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment to add one additional emergency stop button at each of the four sliding frame hydraulic cylinders, as well as two additional wires in conduits C117, C118, C119, and C120. This work was necessary as the contract documents only required one emergency stop button to be mounted for each sliding frame hydraulic cylinder. The selected sliding frame manufacturer, however, recommends two emergency stop buttons for each sliding frame hydraulic cylinder (one at each side of the cylinder.) OCSD has chosen to comply with the manufacturer's recommendation for improved safety precautions. This work was not included in the Contract Documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 48 of the General Requirements. Reference Field Change Order No. 44 and JW Contracting's letter dated January 27, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,156.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: JW Contracting Corporation C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 3, 2003 Job: Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-60 Consultant: Carollo Engineers ITEM 3 — ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS FOR PUMP EQUIPMENT This item is for labor, material, and equipment to add additional conduit and wire to connect Putzmeister pump equipment as described in Plan Change No. 34. Portions of the added work involved with this item are omissions from the contract documents. These omissions include the connection of four discharge pressure transmitters, four rupture disks and four hopper level transmitters. Other work included in this item involves electrical connections to the pump system. These connections are specific for each pump and are dependent on the pump supplier. As the pump supplier was not known at bid time, the Contract Documents only gave a generic connection plan, and could not be finalized until the Contractor selected a supplier. Presently, a time impact analysis justifying a contract time extension has not been submitted by the contractor for this item. After justification for a time extension is submitted and approved, agreed upon time extensions to the contract for this item will be issued in a future change order. This additional work was not included in the Contract Documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 48 of the General Requirements. Reference Field Change Order No. 46 and JW Contracting's letter dated January 27, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $35,783.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 4 Page 3of6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: JW Contractinq Corporation C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 3, 2003 Job: Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-60 Consultant: Carollo Engineers ITEM 4— REVISED MOTOR CONTROL STANDARDS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to construct all the necessary electrical and programming changes to comply with the revised OCSD motor control standard (Revision C). The District's motor control standards had to be revised to correct some operational deficiencies in Revision B, as well as to revise the OCSD software standards. This project was designed using Revision B motor control standards. The major changes between Revision B and Revision C include simplifying the Jog circuit by eliminating an interposing relay, adding a PLC input to monitor the shutdown permissive, adding a "Ready input" signal to the PLC, eliminating several electrical connections between the motor starter and the overload trip contact to avoid overload protection failure, revising terminal numbering to more closely match accepted industry standards, adding an overload input signal for the PLC to allow electronic signaling of an overload condition to the Control Center, and adding an emergency stop input to the PLC to allow monitoring of emergency shutdowns. The electrical changes associated with this item include the addition of 180 feet of 1 1/a" PVC coated galvanized rigid conduit and wiring, 140 feet of 3/4' PVC coated galvanized rigid conduit and wiring, the addition of zero speed indication for Conveyors D-1 and D-2 to existing PLC at CP-DW, the revision of solenoid actuators to dual solenoid actuators for four bin inlet valves, and the modifications to the digital inputs from the motor control center to CCP010. Presently, a time impact analysis justifying a contract time extension has not been submitted by the contractor for this item. After justification for a time extension is submitted and approved, agreed upon time extensions to the contract for this item will be issued in a future change order. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 48 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 54 and JW Contracting's letter regarding Plan Change No. 13C. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 61,613.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 0 Page 4 of 6 17 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: JW Contracting Corporation C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 3, 2003 Job: Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-60 Consultant: Carollo Engineers ITEM 5— RACEWAY AND UPS REVISIONS This item provided for the labor, material, and equipment required to install 1200 feet of conduit and wiring from FCP017 to UPS Panel "LPE" and to CCP010 to supply an electrical connection from the existing dewatering building to the new solids storage and truck loading facility. This 1" PVC coated galvanized rigid conduit and associated wiring was not included in the contract documents and was necessary for supplying power to and monitoring the dewatering operations. This item also provided for the installation of a maintenance bypass switch to meet the new OCSD standards, and a credit for the deletion of two redundant UPS systems as the specified larger UPS system was determined to be able to handle all of the critical loads. Presently, a time impact analysis justifying a contract time extension has not been submitted by the contractor for this item. After justification for a time extension is submitted and approved, agreed upon time extensions to the contract for this item will be issued in a future change order. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 48 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No 55 and JW Contracting's letter regarding Plan Change No. 16A. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $40,303.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6— CONDUIT AND EXHAUST DUCT MODIFICATIONS AT TRUCK LOADING BAYS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to modify the Fiberglass Reinforced Pipe (FRP) ducting and to reroute the conduit below the FRP ducting in the two truck loading bays. This work was necessary to allow sections of the ducting below the Solids Storage Bins to be easily removed to facilitate maintenance and replacement of the screw conveyors. The contractor was directed to reroute approximately 660 feet of 1" PVC coated galvanized rigid conduit that was originally located directly below the ducting. The Contractor was also directed to modify the 30"x30" and 30"x54" FRP ducting by adding removable bell and spigot links in lieu of the specified hand laminated hard fixed joints. In addition, this item also provided for two new10 foot long, 60" diameterFRP elbows to be added to each exhaust fans to provide rain protection and to direct fan noise away from nearby houses. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 48 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No 58 and JW Contracting's letter dated September 5, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $43,283.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $199,346.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days a 4 Page 5 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: JW Contracting Corporation C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 3, 2003 Job: Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-60 Consultant: Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders.lt is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: May 10, 2000 Original Contract Time: 790 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 8, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 17 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 807 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 25, 2002 Projected Final Completion Date: August 14, 2003 Anticipated Liquidated Damages to Date: 221 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable n Original Contract Price $10,428,440.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 64,239.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 199,346.00 Amended Contract Price $10,692,025.00 n 0 Page 6of6 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: JW Contracting Corporation C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 3, 2003 Job: Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-60 Consultant: Carollo Engineers PDC APPROVAL DATE: April 3, 2003 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: John Linder, P.E Date Construction Manager Approved by: David Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: JW Contracting Corporation Contractor Date EDMS:003745651 , '•y., ...'.t 1. .•f: .i'+ a.�..(1 IIrI t' ��R�"t' •I -.,t-- 14, Ss �� ,r l - ♦ VG�, r~ , fi� �� u III+ ��.,�.'•� O d�VY� , aA�Yt ` ' 'i a♦ S<' `4 ♦\_r- /'Ir. 1t �♦,•t• I, �••-t�/ � �' t• , Q ���', �;t�/, 4[, � ,C�� ,• .�f, `, y r•.,4 tt L .�t ` � '6. •+.c' � _2 S co PA. ',t+•' -:.: t ;'~. �::tiY[`...._cC� a`�'; L�4+ai- O/� � � -tt I '� �t' �I '� "t�i�y,�J �`�.•y11 .i'tl, y ,;�; �•/V «• �•�c< • N L r 1 f.'�'f'J` •l Y aO • ,i f CD N }� •b 1 ,'r Job No. P2-60 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 April 2003 Y 1 4 1, '•1. _ 64 y.{�vi �� d�•. li y_ t:•{ I 1 3 ' _. i 1. , -- pgraded Encl05�i�C U rr''9M'_ A Emergency Stop Button To *o ,, �f ITEM NO. 1 c 1 •r Lin- A ' Relocated Electrical Equipment Added Electrical Equipment ITEM NO. 5 �.. p. ITEM NO. 3 P2-60 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 April 2003 New FRP Elbow and Support ;� , �•. fir: f \ � v<,•_ '4 V Relocated conduits 1 � ITEM NO. 6 l ITEM NO. 6 The FAHR minutes of the meeting held May 14 , 2003 were not available for this mailing . These minutes will be distributed at the May 28, 2003 Board of Directors meeting . Once the minutes are finalized , they will also be available on the District's website (www.ocsd . com ). FAH R COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Sd.of Dir. 05/14/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-28 14 c Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2003 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2003. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Investment Policy. The portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Liquid Operating Monies and on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Long- Term Operating Monies, there are two investment policy compliance exceptions. The first exception pertains to Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) securities exceeding the 20 percent limitation of total portfolio holdings within the Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio at 20.06 percent. This overage is due to the $15 million withdrawal of funds in March of 2003 to fund current operations. The exposure will return to within the allowable level in May 2003 when two of the FHLB securities mature. The second investment policy compliance exception pertains to the holding of two securities within the PIMCO's Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio that had an acceptable rating at the time of purchase but has since fallen below the minimum rating allowed by the investment policy. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The first of these rating exceptions pertains to the holding of a United Airlines (UAL) Asset Backed Security with a par value of $1.6 million, representing 0.5 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating from Moody's has fallen several times, from A3 to BA1, then to BA3, and finally to B3. Likewise, the rating from Standard & Poor's has also fallen several times, first from A- to BBB, then to BB, then to B+, and finally to B-. Although these ratings are less than what is required G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\Item 14(c).TREASRPT.doc Page 1 at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if the security was sold at this time. The second ratings exception pertains to the holding of a $5 million par of the Philip Morris-Altria corporate bond with an April 2004 maturity, representing 1 .5 percent of of the portfolio holdings, whose rating with Moody's has fallen from A2 to Baal and then to Baa2, and with S&P from A- to BBB. PIMCO believes based on the underlying assets of the parent company, that the District would again suffer an unwarranted loss if the security was sold at this time. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of "credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. However, PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit for these two securities very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ,< Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The following table details the book balances of the District's investment accounts at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown on the attached bar chart. G.\wp.dta\agenda\Beard Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\11em 14(c).TREASRPT.doc Page 2 Book Balances Estimated v Investment Accounts April 30,2003 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 20,467,427 1.90(1) Union Bank Checking Account 2,011,357 1.15(1) PIMCO—Short-tern Portfolio 48,937,915 1.54 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 322,483,644 2.57 Petty Cash 5.000 N/A TOTAL $39$,905,343 Debt Service Reserves w/Trustees S34.587.488 2.40 (1) This is the annualized yield for the month of March. The April annualized rate was not available as of the date of this report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Graph of Monthly Investment Balances by Type— Last Six Months 2. Investment Transactions and Balances in the State Local Agency Investment Fund 3. PIMCO Monthly Investment Recap & Yield Analysis Report 4. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report— Liquid Operating Monies 5. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report— Long-Term Operating Monies 6. Mellon Trust Net Asset Sector Summary— Liquid Operating Monies 7. Mellon Trust Net Asset Sector Summary— Long-Term Operating Monies 8. Mellon Trust Yield Analysis Report 9. Mellon Trust Portfolio Detail - Consolidated MW:lc G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda ReporlskOS=tem 14(c).TREASRPT.doc Page 3 Prepared by Finance, 5/12/2003, 3:03 PM Monthly Investment Balances by Type- Last Six Months $500,000,000 $450,000,000 E $400,000,000 -- - $350,000,000 i $300,000,000 - $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 - $50,000,000 $0 November December January February March April 2003 2002 2002 2003 2003 2003 O PIMCO- Long-term ®PIMCO - Short-term ®COP Debt Reserves m LAIF 0 Bank Accts 0 Petty Cash G:\excel.dta\fin\220\white\Treasury Management\Monthly Investment Balances Graph.xls Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund April 30, 2003 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield* Balance April 1,2003 $13,484,844 $13,484,844 $13,484,844 1.904 1.904 Deposits: 4/18/2003 18,200,000 18,200,000 18,200,000 1.904 1.904 Quarterly Interest Distribution 82,583 82,583 82,583 1.904 1.904 Withdrawals: 4/10/2003 (5,700,000) (5,700,000) (5,700,000) 1.904 1.904 4/16/2003 (1,400,000) (1,400,000) (1,400,000) 1.904 1.904 4/23/2003 (2,200,000) (2,200,000) (2,200,000) 1.904 1.904 4/30/2003 (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) 1.904 1.904 Total Withdrawls (11,300,000) (11,300,000) (11,300,000) 1.904 1.904 Balance March 31,2003 $20,467,427 $20,467,427 $20,467,427 1.904 1.904 'Yield for the month of March 2003. The Yield for the month of April 2003 was not available as of the date of this report. P I M C O y 840 Newport Center Drive Suite 300 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Tel: 949.720.6000 Fax:949.720.1376 May 9, 2003 Mr. Mike White, CPA Controller Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Dear Mike: The following is a description of events in the bond markets during the month of April in addition to an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term and Liquid portfolios over the period. Also included is a section on our outlook and preferred strategies to be pursued in your portfolios during the coming months. Bond Market Recap: April was a very good month for riskier financial assets, as equities, high yield, and emerging market bonds provided handsome returns. The S&P 500 index climbed 8.24%, while the Merrill Lynch BBB and JP Morgan EMBI-Global Indexes returned 4.82% and 5.69%, respectively. U.S. Treasury yields generally rose, with the exception of very long maturities, as the 30-year treasury yield declined 0.05% to 4.77%. In this modestly rising rate environment, mortgages outperformed Treasuries by 0.31% on a duration-adjusted basis, with Ginnie Maes trailing both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issues. Investment grade corporate bonds also outperformed Treasuries, as the Lehman Credit index posted a sizable duration-adjusted excess return of 1.47%. Within the corporate sector, telecommunications and pipeline issues continued to outperform, earning duration-adjusted excess returns of 1.61% and 2.33%,respectively. The U.S. economy showed signs of benefiting from a post-war bounce; however longer-term trends still pointed toward slow growth. The removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq drove oil prices lower, and appeared to boost U.S. consumer confidence. The Conference Board's measure of consumer confidence jumped from 61 to 81, the largest monthly rise since the Gulf War. Corporate profits rose at a double digit pace during the first quarter; however, real GDP expanded at a slower-than-expected 1.6% annual rate, after growing at a similarly low 1.4% rate in the prior quarter. The nation's labor markets remained weak as the number of payroll jobs fell for the third month in a row while the unemployment rate rose to 6%, matching the post-recession high of last December. Manufacturing continued its downward trend as the Institute for Supply Management's factory index fell to 45.4 from 46.2 in March. The domestic bond market performed well in April, posting a total return of 0.83% as measured by the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Index (LBAG). In absolute terms, the credit sector was the best performing sector, posting a return of 1.85%. The mortgage and Treasury sectors lagged, posting returns of 0.42% and 0.47%, respectively. On a duration-adjusted basis, the credit sector performed best, followed by mortgages and then by Treasuries. Mr. Mike White, CPA May 9, 2003 Orange County Sanitation District Page 2 Treasury yield changes during the month of April are summarized as follows: ■ 3-month bills: unchanged at 1.11% ■ 6-month bills: +2 basis points to 1.13% ■ 2-year notes: unchanged at 1.48% ■ 5-year notes: +4 basis points to 2.75% ■ 10-year notes: +4 basis points to 3.84% ■ 30-year notes: -5 basis points to 4.77% Performance Attribution: Long-Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.36 percent for the month of April, underperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 9 basis points. The following points summarize returns for the period ended April 30: • The Long-Term portfolio underperformed the benchmark by 9 basis points for the month and by 6 basis points for the year-to-date period. • Portfolio duration and yield curve positioning were largely neutral for performance. • Holdings of mortgage-backed securities added to returns as the sector outperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • An underweight exposure to corporates was negative as the sector rallied strongly during the month. Liquid Portfolio The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.10 percent during the month of April, performing in line with the 3- month Treasury Bill Index. The following points summarize returns for the period ending April 30: • The Liquid portfolio performed in line with the benchmark for the month and outperformed the benchmark by 5 basis points for the year-to-date period. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. Outlook and Strategy: Geopolitical uncertainty could create considerable volatility in financial markets over the next year. Regardless of how this uncertainty is ultimately resolved, a pre-existing condition of global excess supply is likely to persist and crimp growth. The U.S. economy is likely to expand by 2%- 2.5%, while Europe and Japan will be hard pressed to grow at all. Yields on 10-year Treasuries Mr. Mike White, CPA May 9, 2003 Orange County Sanitation District Page 3 will range between 3.5% and 4.5%, with the potential to pierce the low end of the range if geopolitical circumstances deteriorate, and test the high end if the situation in Iraq is resolved quickly. Key elements of our cyclical forecast include the following: ■ Demand in the U.S.should hold up better than in other major economies. The weakest part of the U.S.economy - the corporate sector - has pared capital investment, inventories and employees after the excesses of the late 1990s to restore credibility with lenders. This corporate thrift has pressured employment and wages, but it has not dragged down consumption. • Adverse effects on U.S. household income and spending have been and should continue to be mitigated by consumers' ability to monetize housing wealth at mortgage rates near 40-year lows. ■ The outlook is bleaker in Europe and Japan. In these economies, painful consequences of corporate thrift will not be mitigated by effective reflationary policy such as that provided by the Federal Reserve. Europe is on the brink of recession, as disillusioned investors and skeptical credit rating agencies force balance sheet rehabilitation on companies that lag far behind their American counterparts in cost cutting. Japan will not recover so long as its companies and consumers curtail spending. Japanese companies continue to cut employees where they can and use cash flow to pay down debt. ■ Rising commodity prices and a weaker dollar will push inflation modestly higher. Higher prices will be good for commodity exporters in the emerging markets,but will impose a negative terms of trade shock on developed economies. PIMCO plans to reduce risk and take exposures where prospects for attractive returns significantly outweigh downside potential. We plan to limit interest rate risk in two ways: by targeting duration near the benchmark and by emphasizing short and long maturities to guard against rising interest rates in overvalued intermediate maturities. In sector strategies, we plan to trim exposures that have recently fared well. Relatively high yields and strong credit quality make mortgages an attractive long-term alternative. Nevertheless, strong recent gains make this sector vulnerable to a correction, so we may moderate mortgage exposure in the short run. We are likely to remain underweight to corporates overall, especially in higher rated bonds with slim credit premiums, and aim for near-to-above index weightings in more attractively priced issues. We look forward to discussing these and other topics with you in the near future. Best regards, Christine Telish, CFA John M. Miller, CFA Vice President Senior Vice President Orange County Sanitation District " for the month ending April 30, 2003 Total Return Account -203 With Accrued Interest Without Accrued Interest Market Value 326,166,755 322,435,836 Book Value 317,431,963 313,701,044 Yield to Maturity 2.57 2.60 Short Term Account - 603 With Accrued Interest Without Accrued Interest Market Value 49,605,122 48,937,501 Book Value 49,923,178 49,255,557 Yield to Maturity 1.54 1.56 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 April 2003) Page I of I Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $49,605,122 • Mellon $49,605,005 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $49,923,178 • Mellon $49,922,654 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.25 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $124,013 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 67% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No 1 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.10 0.10 3 Months: 0.34 0.29 12 Months: 1.85 1.51 Year-to-Date: 0.45 0.40 Commentary • Interest rates at the short-end of the yield curve remained the same during the month(3-month T-Bills unchanged at 1.11%),while longer maturities decreased slightly(30-year Treasuries fell 5 basis points to 4.77%). • The Liquid portfolio matched the benchmark for the month,and outperformed the benchmark by 5 basis points for the year-to-date period. • PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. (1)Due to the$15 million cash withdrawal to fund current operations on March 19,2003,the account's holding of issuer Federal Home Loan Bank exceeded the 20 percent maximum at 20.06 percent. The position was compliant prior to the cash withdrawal and will be again in May 2003 when two of the FHLB securities mature. Decreasing the exposure via maturities allows the portfolio to avoid transaction costs that would have been incurred through a sell transaction. G:%wp.dta1nn12201whitelTmnsury MgmAL1Q0800-03-04.RPT.doc MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 April 2003) Page I of 3 Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $326,166,755 • Mellon $326,167,524 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $317,431,963 • Mellon $317,748,480 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.27 Of Index: 2.30 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7 403 985 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 27% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 100% 15.1.8 1 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No* 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.36 0.45 3 Months: 1.45 1.53 12 Months: 7.70 8.24 Year-to-Date: 1.53 1.59 • Three-month yields remained the same during the month(90-day T-Bills unchanged at 1.11%)while longer maturities increased slightly(5-year Treasury Notes rose 4 basis points to 2.75%). • The Long-Term portfolio underperformed the benchmark by 9 basis points for the month,and by 6 basis points for the year-to-date period. • Portfolio duration and yield curve positioning were largely neutral for performance. • Holdings of Mortgage-backed securities added to returns as the sector outperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • An underweight exposure to corporate holdings was negative for performance as the sector rallied strongly during the month. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 April 2003) Page 2 of 3 *Compliance Issues: $1,600,000 par of United Airlines(UAL)Pass-Throueh 2001-1-C(909317BC2),6.831%coupon,9/l/2008 maturity,representing 0.5%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis was purchased on 8/10/2001;and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BA (on 9/18/2001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 9/20/2001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BA to BA3 (on 12/21/2001)and by S&P from BBB to BB(on 6/28/02). Following news of the possible bankruptcy filing,the security was further downgraded in August(B3 Moody's,B+by S&P). On November 29,2002,S&P further downgraded this issue to B,and shortly thereafter on December 9,2002,downgraded the issue one notch further to B-. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. On December 4,2002,the Federal Air Transportation Stabilization Board(ATSB)rejected UAL$1.5 billion loan guarantee application,citing fundamental flaws with its proposed business plan. In response to the ATSB rejection,the airline submitted its much-anticipated filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on December 9's. UAL's filing is the largest bankruptcy ever in the global airline industry,resulting from high costs and low airfares that have plagued the industry since"9/11". The ATSB stated that UAL could submit a revised loan guarantee application in the future or seek a loan guarantee as part of a Chapter 11 reorganization. UAL simultaneously renewed its campaign to cut its costs,by announcing it will reduce pay for all officers by about 11%and trim wages for salaried and management employees by 2.8%to 10.7%. UAL will also begin fresh talks with unions about how they will contribute to the cost cutting. UAL said it now has approximately$800 million in unrestricted cash on hand and$600 million in restricted cash. To help the airline meet its bills,the bankruptcy judge approved an initial$800 million in interim financing,part of the$1.5 billion in debtor-in-possession(DIP)financing the carrier arranged with lenders to see it through the bankruptcy. An additional$700 million of the DIP financing will be available to UAL in the event that it satisfies certain conditions,which include that UAL obtain positive cumulative earnings before interest,taxes,depreciation,amortization,and rents(EBITDAR))from December 1,2002. Given UAL's cash burn rate and modest cash on hand,the company must take decisive actions to quickly limit its cash bum before the DIP funds have been dissipated. Compared to its competitors,UAL's labor force is extremely unproductive and the bulk of the airline's restructuring efforts should be focused on improving the productivity of its labor force. As part of its capacity reduction plans,UAL will reject,or abandon,aircraft that it does not intend to use in the future. These reductions will be focused on certain older aircraft models,potentially including B727-200a,B767-200s,13747-400s,and B737-300s. In addition to rejecting aircraft that it does not intend to utilize in the future,UAL may also reject aircraft that it would like to utilize. UAL would be incentivized to reject such aircraft if it believes that it will be able to successfully renegotiate the terms of loans and leases on these aircraft. PIMCO continues participating on ad hoc committees of UAL debt security holders that are seeking collective negotiations with the airline in order to strengthen their bargaining position. The ad hoc committees,their lawyers,and their advisors are currently reviewing restructuring proposals submitted by UAL and formulating responses. PIMCO suspects that this process will take some time given the bankruptcy's complexity. Recent market value fluctuations of UAL bonds are a result of industry uncertainties. The industry has suffered financial damage from reduced revenues and deeper losses leading up to and during the Iraq war,and run the risk of further deterioration if significant terrorist attacks were to occur. PIMCO anticipates that the end of the war and the containment of SARS will prompt a modest pickup in business travel and an overall improvement in the outlook for the airlines,but they do not see a quick recovery. 5,000,000 par of Philip Morris-Altria NT(cusip 718154CH8).4/1/2004 maturity,representing 1.5%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis was purchased on 8/6/2001 at a price of 105.26. This security was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A2 to Baal (on 4/01/2003)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 4110/2003),and is currently priced near 102. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 April 2003) Page 3 of 3 The Philip Morris USA downgrade activity was a result of a negative court judgment and its associated bonding requirement. In the Miles case,named after the initial plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit,an Illinois court fined Philip Morris$10.3 billion for allegedly deceiving smokers into thinking that"light"cigarettes were safer than regular cigarettes. The company,now a subsidiary of Altria,has said that the lawsuit was flawed and that it planned to appeal the ruling and the class certification order that preceded it. Prior to the judgment,PIMCO's analysis of Altria(the holding company and issuer of the debt)shows investment grade credit metrics even excluding in its entirety Philip Morris USA(the domestic tobacco subsidiary and the entity subject to all of the legal suits). The analysis was based on the assumption that the horizon of any final verdict would be years in the future,while the company would generated significant cash flow in the interim. Philip Morris USA sought review of the$10.1 billion verdict in the class action lawsuit by Illinois appellate courts in light of Madison County Circuit Judge Nicholas Byron's decision to affirm his earlier verdict in the case. Philip Morris general counsel stated,"Philip Morris USA believes that when an appellate court reviews the record in this case and applies Illinois law, it will conclude this verdict must be overturned. The company will promptly appeal the$10.1 billion ruling,paving the way for the cigarette maker to appeal the"lights"class-action judgment. It is believed that the appeal will go directly to the Illinois Supreme Court. If the burden of the bonding falls entirely on Philip Morris USA, Altria's credit statistics would remain fairly good despite the bad headlines and the prospect of bankruptcy at the subsidiary. PIMCO believes management is unlikely to sacrifice good subsidiaries to fund the bad one,which would create a bad precedent for future court cases. PIMCO has continued to hold their positions at the holding company(Altria)level,but have suspended any additional purchases until greater clarity emerges on the likelihood of various outcomes. Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB in the event of a split rating. •$4,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities($3 million represented by cusip 345397SJ3 maturing 7/16/04 and$1 million represented by cusip 345397GV9 maturing 5115105),representing 1.2%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+;and now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade from A2 on 1/16/2002 and an S&P rating of BBB after a further downgrade from BBB+on 10/25/2002. •$7,950,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(cusip 370425QV5),maturing on August 4,2003,represents 2.3%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+,and a further downgrade to BBB occurring on 10/16/2002;but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A2. •$3,500,000 par of Virginia Electric Power NT securities(cusip 927804EN0),maturing in 2006,represents 1.0%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The security was downgraded on 10/21/2002 by S&P from A-to BBB+,but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A3. G.I wp.dtalJlnl2201 whitel Treasury MgrnAL-T0800-03-04.RPT.doc !1 Mellon Trust PAGE: I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 30-APR-2003 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS TOTAL SWITZERLAND 3,200,000.00 3,200,000.00 6.45% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 99,625.50 99,625.50 0.20% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 7,708,718.88 7,708,718.88 15.54% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN I YR 6,475,416.44 6,475,416.44 13.05% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN I YR 7,820,447.72 7,820,447.72 15.77% 0.00 OTHER U.S.GOVT OBLIGATIONS 945,518.61 845,518.61 1.70% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 151,234.69 151,234.69 0.30% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 23,100,961.84 23,100,961.84 46.57% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 26,300,961.84 26,300,961.84 53.02% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 6,251,984.38 6,133,500.00 12.36% -118,484.38 U.S.AGENCIES 9,379,081.35 9,287,081.85 18.72% -91,999.50 BANKING&FINANCE 4,976,660.51 4,892,557.05 9.86% -84,103.46 INDUSTRIAL 1,669,829.81 1,652,390.43 3.33% -17,439.38 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 677,046.50 671,424.00 1.35% -5,622.50 TOTAL UNITED STATES 22,954,602.55 22,636,953.33 45.63% -317,649.22 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 22,954,602.55 22,636,953.33 45.63% -317,649.22 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 667,090.06 667,090.06 1.34% 0.00 TOTAL 667,090.06 667,090.06 1.34% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 667,090.06 667,090.06 1.34% 0.00 Ul-MaY-2003Executive or enc Mellon Trust PAGE.- 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 30-APR-2003 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS NET PORTFOLIO 49,922,654.45 49,605,005.23 100.00% -317,649.22 ASSETS Qy_ ExecutiveWo-F-Oenctr IMellon Trust I PAGE: •I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-APR-2003 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 10,302,818.11 10,302,818.11 3.16% 0.00 PAYABLES -50,678,750.00 -50,678,750.00 -15.54% 0.00 TOTAL -40,375,931.89 -40,375,931.89 -12.38% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 3,187,904.00 3,187,904.00 0.98% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 41,946,467.42 41,983,250.49 12.87% 36,783.07 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 15,335,258.36 15,335,258.36 4.70% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN 1 YR 18,543,517.81 18,546,971.44 5.69% 3,453.63 MUTUAL FUNDS 136,735.74 136,735.74 0.04% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 79,149,883.33 79,190,120.03 24.28% 40,236.70 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 38,773,951.44 38,814,188.14 11.90% 40,236.70 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 89,082,570.88 89,662,058.40 27.49% 579,487.52 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 14,241,422.69 17,595,715.29 5.39% 3,354,292.60 U.S.AGENCIES 43,184,917.87 46,130,501.91 14.14% 2,945,584.04 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 17,044,323.11 17,570,063.42 5.39% 525,740.31 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 4,769,190.04 4,887,059.67 1.50% 117,869.63 FHLMC POOLS 262,037.85 268,839.76 0.08% 6,801.91 FHLMC MULTICLASS 2,524,993.70 2,514,575.64 0.77% -10,418.06 FNMA POOLS 29,979,062.50 30,134,141.40 9.24% 155,078.90 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 2,790,998.24 3,065,284.81 0.94% 274,286.57 ABS:CAR LOAN 115,283.31 112,216.36 0.03% -3,066.95 ABS:AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.00 392,000.00 0.12% -1,208,000.00 BANKING&FINANCE 38,044,819.50 38,932,218.85 11.94% 887,399.35 INDUSTRIAL 17,792,380.00 17,915,560.00 5.49% 123,180.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 6,438,210.00 7,003,155.00 2.15% 564,945.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 6,594,240.00 6,656,670.00 2.04% 62,430.00 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE BONDS 926,199.84 829,395.84 0.25% 3,196.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 275,290,649.53 283,669,456.35 86.97% 8,378,806.82 01-may-.2003Executive or enc Mellon Trust p PAGE: I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-APR-2003 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 10,302,818.11 10,302,818.11 3.16% 0.00 PAYABLES -50,678,750.00 -50,678,750.00 -15.54% 0.00 TOTAL -40,375,931.89 -40,375,931.89 -12.38% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 3,187,904.00 3,187,904.00 0.98% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 41,946,467.42 41,983,250.49 12.87% 36,783.07 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN 1 YR 15,335,258.36 15,335,258.36 4.70% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN 1 YR 18,543,517.81 18,546,971.44 5.69% 3,453.63 MUTUAL FUNDS 136,735.74 136,735.74 0.04% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 79,149,883.33 79,190,120.03 24.28% 40,236.70 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 38,773,951.44 38,814,188.14 11.90% 40,236.70 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 89,082,570.88 89,662,058.40 27.49% 579,487.52 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 14,241,422.69 17,595,715.29 5.39% 3,354,292.60 U.S.AGENCIES 43,184,917.87 46,130,501.91 14.14% 2,945,584.04 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 17,044,323.11 17,570,063.42 5.39% 525,740.31 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 4,769,190.04 4,887,059.67 1.50% 117,869.63 FHLMC POOLS 262,037.85 268,839.76 0.08% 6,801.91 FHLMC MULTICLASS 2,524,993.70 2,514,575.64 0.77% -10,418.06 FNMA POOLS 29,979,062.50 30,134,141.40 9.24% 155,078.90 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 2,790,998.24 3,065,284.81 0.94% 274,286.57 ABS:CAR LOAN 115,283.31 112,216.36 0.03% -3,066.95 ABS:AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.00 392,000.00 0.12% -1,208,000.00 BANKING&FINANCE 38,044,819.50 38,932,218.85 11.94% 887,399.35 INDUSTRIAL 17,792,380.00 17,915,560.00 5.49% 123,180.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 6,438,210.00 7,003,155.00 2.15% 564,945.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 6,594,240.00 6,656,670.00 2.04% 62,430.00 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE BONDS 826,199.84 829,395.84 0.25% 3,196.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 275,290,649.53 283,669,456.35 86.97% 8,378,806.82 07-mew-20mExecutive or enc Mellon Trust II PAGE: 2 BA SE.- USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-APR-2003 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 275,290,649.53 283,669,456.35 86.97% 8,378,806.82 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,683,879.12 3,683,879.12 1.13% 0.00 TOTAL 3,683,879.12 3,683,879.12 1.13% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,683,879.12 3,683,879.12 1.13% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO 317,748,480.09 326,167,523.61 100.00% 8,419,043.52 ASSETS UI-Alay-203ecu 1Ve WOMench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE z 1 OCSF07511102 2003/04/30 RUN DATE z 05/06/03 DISTRICTi LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME z 10.52.34 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYSTEM .000 .000 P-1 99.509 497,544.44 1.89 313312FE5 MAT 05/05/2003 A-1+ 497,544.44 1.02 750,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYSTEM .000 .000 P-1 99.404 745,531.25 2.83 313312GKO MAT 06/03/2003 A-l+ 745,531.25 1.52 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.707 997,073.61 3.79 313384FW4 MAT 05/21/2003 A-1+ 997,073.61 2.04 1,865,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.412 1,854,040.02 7.04 313384GFO MAT 05/30/2003 A-1+ 1,854,040.02 3.79 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.450 497,249.33 1.89 313384HAO MAT 06/18/2003 A-1+ 497,248.33 1.02 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.399 1,987,986.11 7.55 313384HV4 MAT 07/07/2003 A-1+ 1,987,986.11 4.06 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.364 2,484,099.65 9.44 313384BXO MAT 07/09/2003 A-1+ 2,484,099.65 5.08 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.682 498,411.25 1.89 313396FQ1 MAT 05/15/2003 A-1+ 498,411.25 1.02 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.422 4,971,111.11 18.90 313396FR6 MAT 05/22/2003 A-l+ 4,971,111.11 10.16 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.612 996,120.83 3.78 313396GF4 MAT 05/30/2003 A-1+ 996,120.83 2.04 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.997 1,799,937.50 6.84 313588FAS MAT 05/01/2003 A-1+ 1,799,937.50 3.68 500,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.474 497,371.81 1.89 313588GT6 MAT 06/11/2003 A-1+ 497,371.61 1.02 800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS .000 .000 P-1 99.395 795,156.00 3.02 313588HOI MAT 07/02/2003 A-1+ 795,156.00 1.62 100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.625 99,625.50 .37 36959JTB9 06/11/2003 99,625.50 .20 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 2 OCSF07511102 2003/04/30 RUN DATE s 05/06/03 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME s 10.52.34 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 850,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.473 845,518.61 3.21 863872FQS MAT 05/15/2003 A-1+ 845,516.61 1.73 3,200,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO .000 1.200 100.000 3,200,000.00 12.16 99404T910 01.200% 05/01/2003 DD 04/30/03 3,200,000.00 6.54 151,234.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 1.054 AAA 100.000 151,234.69 .57 996085247 AAA 151,234.69 .31 3,402,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS 1.438 .000 P-1 99.440 3,382,951.13 12.86 313588FG5 MAT 05/07/2003 A-1+ 3,382,951.13 6.91 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .021 .051 26,300,961.84 100.00 26,300,961.84 53.76 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH SR NT .000 1.600 AA1 100.000 1,502,520.00 6.62 046003KHI FLTG RT 05/08/2003 DD 05/08/00 AA- 1,500,000.00 3.07 650,000.00 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC .000 5.688 AA3 103.296 677,046.50 2.96 077858AA6 5.875% 02/01/2004 DD 02/01/94 A+ 671,424.00 1.37 300,000.00 COLGATE PALMOLIVE MTN TR 00058 .000 5.154 AA3 102.250 308,808.00 1.35 19416QCK4 5.270% 12/01/2003 DD 11/24/98 AA- 306,750.00 .63 1,350,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS SYSTE .000 5.240 AAA 103.057 1,399,963.50 6.14 31331H6G7 6.40% 01/23/2004 DD 01/01/1999 AAA 1,391,264.64 2.84 550,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS MTN .000 4.921 AAA 101.606 565,229.50 2.46 31331RC78 5.000% 10/02/2003 DD 10/02/98 AAA 558,834.10 1.14 650,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEBS .000 7.353 AAA 100.294 657,377.50 2.87 3134A34H6 7.375% 05/15/2003 DD 05/26/00 AAA 651,909.83 1.33 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS .000 4.972 AAA 103.076 3,321,088.00 14.57 31359HEMI 5.125% 02/13/2004 DD 02/08/99 AAA 3,298,423.36 6.74 533,000.00 GENERAL ELEC MTN #TR 00454 .000 7.462 AAA 100.515 544,976.51 2.36 36962GUXO 7.500% 06/05/2003 DD 06/05/00 A-2 535,744.95 1.09 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 3 OCSF07511102 2003/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/06/03 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.52.34 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 250,000.00 GILLETTE CO NT .000 6.163 AA3 101.406 256,012.50 1.11 375766AC6 6.250% 08/15/2003 DD 08/16/93 AA- 253,515.00 .52 500,000.00 PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC NTS .000 6.261 AA2 103.015 519,405.00 2.27 695629CE3 6.450% 12/01/2003 DD 12/01/98 AA+ 515,075.00 1.05 656,000.00 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE CO NTS .000 5.175 AA3 101.453 672,278.56 2.94 742718BK4 5.250% 09/15/2003 DD 09/28/98 AA- 665,531.68 1.36 5,800,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS .000 11.229 AAA 105.750 6,251,984.38 27.09 91281ODGO 11.875% 11/15/2003 DD 10/05/83 AAA 6,133,500.00 12.53 425,000.00 WAL MART STORES INC .000 6.476 AA2 100.375 432,730.75 1.88 931142AQ6 6.500% 06/01/2003 AA 426,593.75 .87 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS 1.454 4.481 AAA 100.435 1,018,200.00 4.43 3134A4FF6 4.500% 06/15/2003 DD 06/15/01 AAA 1,004,348.50 2.05 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 1.517 4.471 AAA 100.646 2,039,880.00 8.99 3133NG5J1 4.500% 07/07/2003 DD 07/06/01 AAA 2,012,921.60 4.11 450,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO SUBNT 1.615 5.985 AA3 102.343 467,496.00 2.03 949740BY9 6.125% 11/01/2003 DD 11/01/93 A 460,543.50 .94 150,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS MTN 1.664 6.444 AAA 101.645 155,796.00 .67 31331NW59 6.550% 08/19/2003 DD 08/19/96 AAA 152,467.23 .31 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 1.664 5.843 AAA 101.404 103,311.00 .44 3133MSSB2 5.925% 08/14/2003 DD 08/14/98 AAA 101,404.10 .21 1,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DW MTN 6TR00349 1.757 7.013 AA3 101.593 1,045,350.00 4.48 61745EQN4 7.125% 08/15/2003 DD 08/10/00 AA- 1,015,930.00 2.08 100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 1.917 6.686 AAA 100.355 102,765.00 .44 31364CDD7 6.710% 05/21/2003 DD 05/21/96 AAA 100,354.77 .21 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO i CO NEW NT 1.949 7.200 AA2 100.000 560,601.00 2.38 949740CH5 7.200% 05/01/2003 DD 04/26/00 A+ 540,000.00 1.10 324,000.00 BANKAMERICA CORP SUB NT 2.372 6.848 AA3 100.390 336,312.00 1.43 066050BZ7 6.875% 06/01/2003 DD 06/01/93 A 325,263.60 .66 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 4 OCSF07511102 2003/04/30 RUN DATE s 05/06/03 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE t 10.52.34 PAR VALUE YT14 AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S—P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 15,000.00 FEDERAL SOME LN BKS CONS BD 2.751 5.939 AAA 101.025 15,470.85 .06 3133M4VC4 6.000% 07/14/2003 DD 07/14/98 AAA 25,153.72 .03 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES .211 6.400 22,954,602.55 100.00 22,636,953.33 46.24 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL .129 3.602 49,255,564.39 100.00 48,937,915.17 100.00 ------------------ --------- YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 5 OCSF07522202 2003/04/30 RUN DATE 2 05/06/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.52.34 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.978 1,196,284.17 1.51 313384FG9 MAT 05/07/2003 A-1+ 1,199,737.80 .33 1,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.710 1,595,360.00 2.01 313384HZ5 MAT 07/11/2003 A-1+ 1,595,360.00 .44 15,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.695 15,751,873.64 19.89 313384JEO HAT 07/16/2003 A-1+ 15,751,873.64 4.34 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN HTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.790 997,902.22 1.26 313396FY4 HAT 05/23/2003 A-1+ 997,902.22 .28 13,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.859 12,944,923.33 16.39 313396HGI HAT 06/24/2003 A-1+ 12,981,706.40 3.58 24,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.668 24,518,273.34 30.96 313396JD6 MAT 07/15/2003 A-l+ 24,518,273.34 6.76 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.598 2,191,163.64 2.76 313396KT9 MAT 08/22/2003 A-1+ 2,191,163.64 .60 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.554 1,294,204.89 1.63 313396LQ4 HAT 09/12/2003 A-1+ 1,294,204.89 .36 8,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS .000 .000 P-1 99.473 8,654,172.75 10.92 313588FPS HAT 05/14/2003 A-1+ 8,654,172.75 2.38 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.749 2,194,473.11 2.77 313588GRO HAT 06/09/2003 A-1+ 2,194,473.11 .60 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS .000 .000 P-1 99.702 4,496,612.50 5.66 31358SHH1 HAT 06/25/2003 A-1+ 4,486,612.50 1.24 3,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.622 3,187,904.00 4.02 36959JTC7 06/12/2003 3,187,904.00 .88 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 6 OCSF07522202 2003/04/30 RUN DATE i 05/06/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 2 10.52.34 ------------ PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 136,735.74 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 1.054 AAA 100.000 136,735.74 .17 996085247 AAA 136,735.74 .04 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 .000 79,149,883.33 100.00 79,190,120.03 21.83 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 752,000.00 AIG SUNAMERICA GLO BDS USD .000 5.304 110.292 826,199.84 .29 NA2789454 5.850% 01-AUG-2008 829,395.84 .23 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF NTG .000 4.870 AAA 102.680 5,081,250.00 1.80 01FO50460 5.000% 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 AAA 5,133,984.50 1.41 4,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG .000 4.888 AAA 102.289 4,085,312.50 1.44 01F050478 5.000% 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 AAA 4,091,562.40 1.13 15,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG .000 5.725 AAA 104.797 15,660,937.50 5.54 0IF060451 6.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 15,719,532.00 4.33 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG .000 5.781 AAA 103.781 5,151,562.50 1.82 01F060667 6.000% 06/01/2033 DD 06/01/03 AAA 5,189,062.50 1.43 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG .000 6.186 AAA 105.078 10,480,937.50 3.70 O1N062656 6.500% 05/15/2033 DD 05/01/03 AAA 10,507,812.00 2.90 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN # TR 00459 .000 1.627 A2 100.171 899,406.00 .31 073928VC4 VAR RT 12/01/2003 DD 08/17/01 A 901,539.00 .25 1,500,000.00 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT .000 5.203 A2 105.703 1,527,135.00 .55 125581AD0 5.500% 11/30/2007 DD 12/02/02 A 1,585,545.00 .44 5,000,000.00 CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB HT .000 5.212 AA2 107.921 5,333,600.00 1.90 172967BP5 5.625% 08/27/2012 DD 08/26/02 A+ 5,396,050.00 1.49 150,196.10 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 .000 5.801 100.669 153,340.84 .05 25475MAD6 5.840% 10/17/2011 DD 03/18/99 151,200.91 .04 159,013.03 FHLMC GROUP #G4-0353 .000 7.262 AAA 103.278 163,038.05 .05 3128DBMA2 7.500% 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 AAA 164,226.27 .05 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 7 OCSF07522202 2003/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/06/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.52.34 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAR VALUE YT14 AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS .000 6.491 AAA 109.773 7,997,625.00 2.90 3133MAUN7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 8,232,945.00 2.27 101,473.20 FHLMC GROUP #78-6064 .000 3.728 AAA 103.095 98,999.80 .03 31348SWZ3 6.384% 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97 AAA 104,613.49 .03 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS .000 4.813 AAA 109.087 11,521,271.50 4.36 31359MJX2 5.250% 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AAA 12,381,401.74 3.41 2,402,535.21 GNMA POOL #0569358 .000 6.189 AAA 105.030 2,458,844.63 .88 36200QQK3 6.500% 04/15/2032 DD 04/01/02 AAA 2,523,383.43 .70 394,484.62 GNMA II POOL #0000395 .000 4.424 AAA 101.711 390,909.61 .14 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 401,234.84 .11 3,574,703.14 GNMA II POOL #080408X .000 4.424 AAA 101.711 3,538,397.56 1.28 36225CN28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 3,635,850.22 1.00 3,000,000.00 GTE NORTH INC DEB SER A .000 5.809 Al 103.296 3,063,750.00 1.09 362337AD9 6.000% 01/15/2004 DD 01/15/94 A+ 3,098,880.00 .85 5,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN #TR 00575 .000 5.132 AAA 106.203 5,203,500.00 1.87 36962GZY3 5.450% 01/15/2013 DD 12/06/02 A-2 5,310,150.00 1.46 4,000,000.00 GENERAL HTRS ACCEP HTN #00615 .000 1.681 A2 99.937 3,998,440.00 1.40 37042WE80 VAR RT 08/04/2003 DD 08/03/01 BBB 3,997,480.00 1.10 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR NT .000 5.898 A2 103.843 3,064,350.00 1.09 370425SD3 6.125% 08/28/2007 DD 08/29/02 BBB 3,115,290.00 .86 3,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC SR NT .000 3.997 AA3 103.203 3,030,030.00 1.09 38141GCS1 4.125% 01/15/2008 DD 01/13/03 A+ 3,096,090.00 .85 1,635,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT .000 5.820 A2 109.531 1,772,820.00 .63 441812JW5 6.375% 10/15/2011 DD 10/23/01 A 1,790,831.85 .49 3,000,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE 6 CO SUB NT .000 5.412 A2 106.250 3,127,260.00 1.12 46625HAT7 5.750% 01/02/2013 DD 11/25/02 A 3,187,500.00 .88 3,200,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY NT .000 3.596 AA3 100.812 3,195,648.00 1.13 617446HW2 3.625% 04/01/2008 DD 03/06/03 A+ 3,225,984.00 .89 3,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL UTILS COOP FIN .000 6.174 A2 117.421 3,465,480.00 1.24 637432CU7 7.250% 03/01/2012 DD 03/07/02 A 3,522,630.00 .97 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 8 OCSF07522202 2003/04/30 RUN DATE : 05/06/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.52.34 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 5,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS .000 7.353 BAA2 102.000 5,263,000.00 1.79 718154CH8 7.500% 04/01/2004 DD 04/01/97 BBB 5,100,000.00 1.41 112,163.76 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.427 AAA 100.047 115,283.31 .03 74046RFW6 6.430% 03/08/2004 DD 06/21/99 112,216.36 .03 3,679,356.91 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 .000 5.742 AAA 110.420 3,679,356.91 1.43 83162CLJO 6.340% 03/01/2021 AAA 4,062,745.90 1.12 2,637,657.40 SBA GTD PARTH CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .000 6.010 AAA 110.480 2,637,657.40 1.02 831641DD4 6.640% 02/10/2011 DD 02/21/01 NR 2,914,083.90 .80 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1 C .000 27.882 B3 24.500 1,600,000.00 .13 909317BC2 6.831% 03/01/2010 DD 08/22/01 A- 392,000.00 .11 20,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.476 AAA 114.125 22,620,312.50 8.04 9128272JO 06.250% 02/15/2007 DD 02/15/97 AAA 22,825,000.00 6.29 57,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.230 AAA 109.938 62,782,901.47 22.12 9128276N7 05.750% 11/15/2005 DD 11/15/00 AAA 62,774,312.50 17.30 3,000,000.00 VERIZON GLOBAL FDG CORP GLOBAL .000 6.219 A2 118.593 3,530,490.00 1.25 92344GAT3 7.375% 09/01/2012 DD 08/26/02 A+ 3,557,790.00 .98 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PWR 01 SER A .000 5.323 A3 108.015 3,487,680.00 1.33 927804ENO 5.750% 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01 BBB+ 3,700,525.00 1.04 16,175,320.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.817 3.103 AAA 108.781 14,241,422.69 6.20 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 AAA 17,595,715.29 4.85 3,950,000.00 GMAC NTS 5.752 1.442 A2 99.828 3,918,760.50 1.39 370425QV5 VAR RT 08/18/2003 DD 08/17/98 BBB 3,943,206.00 1.09 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 5.881 1.450 Al 100.000 1,992,800.00 .70 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05/11/98 A 2,000,000.00 .55 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 5.967 6.486 AAA 109.851 16,154,410.00 6.00 31359HFH1 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/14/00 AAA 17,026,849.20 4.69 1,387,260.94 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A 6.316 4.350 AAA 98.240 1,388,738.94 .48 3133TCE95 VAR RT 06/15/2032 DD 12/01/97 AAA 1,362,845.15 .38 1,026,255.86 GNHA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 6.320 1.800 AAA 100.633 1,026,255.86 .36 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,032,752.06 .28 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 9 OCSF07522202 2003/04/30 RUN DATE s 05/06/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME s 10.52.34 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 13,544.06 GNMA POOL #0500917 6.389 5.718 AAA 104.926 12,856.28 .00 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 14,211.21 .00 50,927.84 GNMA POOL #0506636 6.389 5.718 AAA 104.926 48,341.66 .01 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 53,436.43 .01 538,670.58 GNMA POOL 10503388 6.389 5.718 AAA 104.926 511,316.21 .19 36210VF55 6.000% 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99 AAA 565,204.31 .16 19,57B.74 GNMA POOL #0499153 6.389 5.718 AAA 104.926 18,584.50 .00 3621000ES 6.000% 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 20,543.15 .01 660,721.38 GNMA POOL #0496461 6.390 5.718 AAA 104.926 627,169.10 .24 36210MQN4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 693,267.06 .19 172,311.42 GNMA POOL #0491103 6.390 5.710 AAA 104.926 163,561.24 .06 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 180,799.10 .05 16,209.98 GNMA POOL #0486720 6.390 5.710 AAA 104.926 15,386.82 .00 36210AVM6 6.000% 12/15/2029 DD 12/01/98 AAA 17,008.45 .00 32,316.30 GNMA POOL #0497343 6.390 5.718 AAA 104.926 30,675.25 .01 36210NP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AAA 33,908.13 .01 26,817.59 GNMA POOL #0469688 6.391 5.718 AAA 104.926 25,455.77 .00 36209EXRB 6.000% 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/98 AAA 28,138.57 .01 30,493.62 GNMA POOL #0467279 6.391 5.715 AAA 104.988 28,945.12 .01 36209CCQ7 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 32,014.73 .01 58,571.85 GNMA POOL #0457814 6.391 5.715 AAA 104.988 55,597.49 .02 36208QSB3 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 61,493.58 .02 576,844.41 GNMA POOL #0467286 6.391 5.715 AAA 104.988 547,551.53 .21 36209CCX2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 605,619.02 .17 740,980.53 GNMA POOL #0465555 6.392 5.715 AAA 104.988 703,352.63 .27 36209AE48 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 777,942.71 .21 22,678.75 GNMA POOL #0483452 6.392 5.715 AAA 104.988 21,527.09 .00 36209WBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 23,810.03 .01 702,555.92 GNMA POOL 10465546 6.392 5.715 AAA 104.988 666,879.26 .26 36209AET3 6.000% 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98 AAA 737,601.38 .20 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 10 OCSF07522202 2003/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/06/03 DISTRICTi LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME s 10.52.34 PAR VALUE YT14 AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 592,399.99 GNMA POOL #0468339 6.392 5.715 AAA 104.988 562,317.20 .21 36209DHQO 6.000% 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98 AAA 621,950.56 .17 36,348.10 GNMA POOL #0438057 6.393 5.715 AAA 104.988 34,502.31 .01 36207PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 38,161.25 .01 32,154.37 GNMA POOL #0468330 6.393 5.715 AAA 104.988 30,521.52 .01 36209DHF4 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 33,758.32 .01 1,135,750.48 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.410 AAA 101.407 1,136,254.76 .40 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AAA 1,151,730.49 .32 2,899,004.64 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E 6.499 5.531 AAA 108.487 2,742,864.70 1.10 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 3,145,043.16 .87 490,327.81 GNMA II POOL #080088M 6.705 5.227 AAA 102.822 501,053.73 .17 36225CC20 7.375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 AAA 504,166.82 .14 2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.717 6.282 A2 105.468 1,992,200.00 .74 57174BABB 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 AA- 2,109,360.00 .58 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.457 A3 103.765 2,995,080.00 1.09 345397SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 BBB 3,112,950.00 .86 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME INS INC NT 6.866 6.482 A3 105.671 2,498,400.00 .93 22237UAB8 6.850% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2,641,775.00 .73 333,308.71 GNHA II POOL #0080023 6.992 5.422 AAA 103.750 338,829.14 .12 36225CAE9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 345,807.79 .10 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 7.113 5.632 AAA 117.623 2,030,133.00 .87 31359MEY5 6.625% 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 AAA 2,470,084.05 .68 792,684.47 GREYSTONE SVCG CORP FRA #95-7 7.564 7.187 AAA 103.379 781,103.85 .28 39810#AE4 7.430% 06/01/2023 DD 02/29/00 AAA 919,468.09 .23 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 7.582 6.552 A3 103.015 965,170.00 .36 345397GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93 BBB 1,030,150.00 .28 951,928.65 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE #000-11150 7.684 6.986 AAA 107.357 931,253.96 .36 302998GE3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 1,021,958.61 .28 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN #TR 00115 7.709 6.796 A3 107.421 2,950,530.00 1.13 69512EEU5 7.300% 10/22/2004 DD 20/22/92 A 3,222,630.00 .89 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11 OCSF07522202 2003/04/30 RUN DATE 3 05/06/03 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.52.34 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 7.967 7.074 Al 111.328 1,594,032.00 .62 020002AL5 7.875% 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 A+ 1,781,248.00 .49 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES .746 5.270 275,290,649.53 100.00 283,669,456.35 78.19 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL .710 5.021 354,440,532.86 100.00 362,959,576.30 100.00 Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: - 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 722.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2003 -722.02 996085247 01-Apr-2003 722.02 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 722.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2003 -722.02 996085247 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Apr-2003 -24,600,000.00 99403R535 01.250%04/02/2003 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 24,600,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Apr-2003 -24,600,000.00 99403R535 01.250%04/02/2003 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 13,750.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2003 -13,750.00 996085247 02-Apr-2003 13,750.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 13,750.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2003 -13,750.00 996085247 02-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 02-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh !� Mellon Trust- Sample Report ', PAGE: 2 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 82,580.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2003 -82,580.83 996085247 02-Apr-2003 82,580.83 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 82,580.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2003 -82,580.83 996085247 02-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 02-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Apr-2003 -24,518,273.34 313396JD6 MAT 07/15/2003 02-Apr-2003 24,518,273.34 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Apr-2003 -24,518,273.34 313396JD6 MAT 07/15/2003 02-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 02-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,796,024.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr-2003 -1,796,024.73 996085247 03-Apr-2003 1,796,024.73 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,796,024.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr-2003 -1,796,024.73 996085247 03-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 03-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,564,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Apr-2003 -1,564,000.00 996085247 08-Apr-2003 1,564,000.00 B 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive - Wnrklrvni-h Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,564,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Apr-2003 -1,564,000.00 996085247 08-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 08-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 10-Apr-2003 -3,400,000.00 99404A283 01.240%04/11/2003 DD 04/10/ 10-Apr-2003 3,400,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 10-Apr-2003 -3,400,000.00 99404A283 01.240%04/11/2003 DD 041101 10-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 10-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 117.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I I-Apr-2003 -117.11 996085247 11-Apr-2003 117.11 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 117.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I I-Apr-2003 -117.11 996085247 11-Apr-2003 0.00 FC I I-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO I I-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 9940413497 01.200%04/14/2003 DD 04/11/ 11-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 1 I-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404B497 01.200%04/14/2003 DD 04/1 1/ 11-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS MC,NY I I-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive WnrkhPnrh N Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 4 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO I I-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 9940413448 01.200%04/14/2003 DD 04/11/ 11-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 11-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 9940413448 0 1.200%04/14/2003 DD 04/11/ 11-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C I I-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 340.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Apr-2003 -340.00 996085247 14-Apr-2003 340.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 340.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Apr-2003 -340.00 996085247 14-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 14-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 14-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 9940411794 0 1.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ 14-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 14-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 9940413794 0 1.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ 14-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 14-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 14-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404C941 01.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ 14-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhvnrh �I Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: •5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 14-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404C941 01.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ 14-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 14-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 119.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Apr-2003 -119.00 996085247 15-Apr-2003 119.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 119.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Apr-2003 -119.00 996085247 15-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 989,437.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Apr-2003 -989,437.98 996085247 15-Apr-2003 989,437.98 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 989,437.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Apr-2003 -989,437.98 996085247 15-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 15-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404EO61 01.300%04/16/2003 DD 04/15/ 15-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 15-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404EO61 01.300%04/16/2003 DD 04/15/ 15-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 15-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhanrh �+ Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 6 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHiARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 15-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404EI37 01.300%04/16/2003 DD 04/15/ 15-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 15-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404EI37 01.300%04/16/2003 DD 041151 15-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 15-Apr-2003 -1,595,360.00 313384HZ5 MAT 07/11/2003 15-Apr-2003 1,595,360.00 B BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 15-Apr-2003 -1,595,360.00 313384HZ5 MAT 07/11/2003 15-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 122.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2003 -122.78 996085247 16-Apr-2003 122.78 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 122.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2003 -122.78 996085247 16-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 16-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 9940417456 01.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 16-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive " Wnrkhanrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 16-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 9940417456 0 1.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 16-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 16-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404F654 01.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 16-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 16-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404F654 01.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 16-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Apr-2003 -15,751,873.64 313384JEO MAT 07/16/2003 16-Apr-2003 15,751,873.64 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Apr-2003 -15,751,873.64 313384JEO MAT 07/16/2003 16-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 114.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH`vIGMT 17-Apr-2003 -114.28 996085247 17-Apr-2003 114.28 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 114.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2003 -114.28 996085247 17-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhvnr.h Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 8 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 17-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404G686 01.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 17-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 17-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404G686 01.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 17-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 17-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 17-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404G744 0 1.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 17-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 17-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404G744 0 1.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 17-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 17-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 204,408.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Apr-2003 -204,408.95 996085247 21-Apr-2003 204,408.95 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 204,408.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Apr-2003 -204,408.95 996085247 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,705.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Apr-2003 -28,705.87 996085247 22-Apr-2003 28,705.87 B 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhanrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report l PAGE: -9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,705.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Apr-2003 -28,705.87 996085247 22-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 22-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404K703 01.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 22-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 22-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 99404K703 01.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 22-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROS INC REPO 22-Apr-2003 -1,600,000.00 99404Q213 0 1.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 22-Apr-2003 1,600,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROS INC REPO 22-Apr-2003 -1,600,000.00 99404Q213 01.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 22-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 23-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404M154 0 1.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 23-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 23-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404MI54 0 1.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 23-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkha»rh Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 10 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OM-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 23-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404MI39 0 1.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 23-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 23-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404M 139 01.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Apr-2003 -2,191,163.64 313396KT9 MAT 08/22/2003 23-Apr-2003 2,191,163.64 B DAIN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 23-Apr-2003 -2,191,163.64 313396KT9 MAT 08/22/2003 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404M584 01.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 24-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404M584 01.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 24-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 24-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 24-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404N244 01.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 24-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive " Wnrkhnnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report f I PAGE. 11 J PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 24-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404N244 0 1.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 24-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 24-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 245,545.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2003 -245,545.02 996085247 25-Apr-2003 245,545.02 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 245,545.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2003 -245,545.02 996085247 25-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 25-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 25-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404P546 01.160%04/28/2003 DD 04/25/ 25-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 25-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404P546 01.160%04/28/2003 DD 04/25/ 25-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 25-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 25-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404N665 01.160%04/28/2003 DD 04/25/ 25-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 25-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404N665 01.160%04/28/2003 DD 04/251 25-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 25-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-1003 13:51:Sl Executive Wnrkhvnrh �I Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 12 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,680.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Apr-2003 -10,680.39 996085247 28-Apr-2003 10,680.39 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,680.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Apr-2003 -10,680.39 996085247 28-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,929.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Apr-2003 -150,929.70 996085247 28-Apr-2003 150,929.70 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,929.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Apr-2003 -150,929.70 996085247 28-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Apr-2003 -1,000,000.00 99404RI 12 0 1.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2003 1,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Apr-2003 -1,000,000.00 99404R 112 01.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404RI 12 01.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-McU-2003 13:52:51 Executive " Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report �� PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404RI 12 01.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 28-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404Q890 01.220%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 28-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404Q890 01.220%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,034.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Apr-2003 -1,000,034.17 996085247 29-Apr-2003 1,000,034.17 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,034.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Apr-2003 -1,000,034.17 996085247 29-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 29-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 170.14 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Apr-2003 -170.14 996085247 29-Apr-2003 170.14 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 170.14 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Apr-2003 -170.14 996085247 29-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 29-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:51:51 Execulive Wnrkhonrh !� Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 14 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Apr-2003 -1,294,204.89 313396LQ4 MAT 09/12/2003 29-Apr-2003 1,294,204.89 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 29-Apr-2003 -1,294,204.89 313396LQ4 MAT 09/12/2003 29-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 29-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 29-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404R393 01.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 29-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 29-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404R393 01.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 29-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 29-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404S433 01.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 29-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 29-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 99404S433 01.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 29-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 29-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 134.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2003 -134.85 996085247 30-Apr-2003 134.85 B 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive " Wnrkhvn.-h Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 134.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2003 -134.85 996085247 30-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 30-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 30-Apr-2003 -1,799,937.50 313588FA8 MAT 05/01/2003 30-Apr-2003 1,799,937.50 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 30-Apr-2003 -1,799,937.50 313588FA8 MAT 05/01/2003 30-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 30-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 30-Apr-2003 -3,200,000.00 99404T910 0 1.200%05/01/2003 DD 04/30/ 30-Apr-2003 3,200,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 30-Apr-2003 -3,200,000.00 99404T910 01.200%05/01/2003 DD 04/30/ 30-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 30-Apr-2003 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 5,156,250.00 0I F052441 5.500%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -5,156,250.00 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 154,451.63 FNMA POOL#0254402 12-Feb-2003 -159,278.24 31371KRX1 5.500%08/01/2017 DD 07/01/ 21-Apr-2003 159,278.24 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report + PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 154,451.63 FNMA POOL#0254402 12-Feb-2003 -471.94 31371KRXI 5.500%08/01/2017 DD 07,101/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 154,451.63 FNMA POOL#0254402 12-Feb-2003 -159,750.18 31371KRXI 5.500%08/01/2017 DD 07.101/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 87,841.37 FNMA POOL#0254511 12-Feb-2003 -90,586.41 31371KVC2 5.500%11/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 90,586.41 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 87,841.37 FNMA POOL#0254511 12-Feb-2003 -268.40 31371KVC2 5.500%11/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 1B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 87,841.37 FNMA POOL#0254511 12-Feb-2003 -90,854.81 31371KVC2 5.500%11/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 840,448.61 FNMA POOL#0511821 12-Feb-2003 -866,712.63 31383SSJO 5.500%06/01/2016 DD 06/01/ 21-Apr-2003 866,712.63 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 840,448.61 FNMA POOL#0511821 12-Feb-2003 -2,568.04 31383SSJO 5.500%06/01/2016 DD 06/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Workhvnrh } �+ Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINfLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 840,448.61 FNMA POOL#0511821 12-Feb-2003 -869,280.67 31383SSJO 5.500%06/01/2016 DD 06/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 159,451.85 FNMA POOL#0545300 12-Feb-2003 -164,434.72 31385HX56 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 164,434.72 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 159,451.85 FNMA POOL#0545300 12-Feb-2003 -487.21 31385HX56 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 159,451.85 FNMA POOL#0545300 12-Feb-2003 -164,921.93 31385HX56 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 109,729.50 FNMA POOL#0545894 12-Feb-2003 -113,158.55 31385JNKO 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 21-Apr-2003 113,158.55 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 109,729.50 FNMA POOL#0545894 12-Feb-2003 -335.28 31385JNKO 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 I 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 109,729.50 FNMA POOL#0545894 12-Feb-2003 -113,493.83 31385JNKO 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE.- 18 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG000I0000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 871,636.59 FNMA POOL#0545904 12-Feb-2003 -898,875.23 31385JNV6 5.500%09/01/2017 DD 08,/01/ 21-Apr-2003 898,875.23 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 871,636.59 FNMA POOL#0545904 12-Feb-2003 -2,663.33 31385JNV6 5.500%09/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 871,636.59 FNMA POOL#0545904 12-Feb-2003 -901,538.56 31385JNV6 5.500%09/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 845,448.51 FNMA POOL#0602248 12-Feb-2003 -871,868.78 31388EBR6 5.500%11/01/2016 DD I 1/01/ 21-Apr-2003 871,868.78 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 845,448.51 FNMA POOL#0602248 12-Feb-2003 -2,583.31 31388EBR6 5.500%11/01/2016 DD l 1/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 113 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 845,448.51 FNMA POOL#0602248 12-Feb-2003 -874,452.09 31388EBR6 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 11/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 128,264.12 FNMA POOL#0623107 12-Feb-2003 -132,272.37 31389EGQ2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 132,272.37 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive " Wnrkbenrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 128,264.12 FNMA POOL#0623107 12-Feb-2003 -391.92 31389EGQ2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 128,264.12 FNMA POOL#0623107 12-Feb-2003 -132,664.29 31389EGQ2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 890,170.75 FNMA POOL#0626711 12-Feb-2003 -917,988.59 31389JGU2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 917,988.59 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 890,170.75 FNMA POOL#0626711 12-Feb-2003 -2,719.97 31389JGU2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 890,170.75 FNMA POOL#0626711 12-Feb-2003 -920,708.56 31389JGU2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 912,058.77 FNMA POOL#0665290 12-Feb-2003 -940,560.61 31391FC30 5.500%10/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 940,560.61 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 912,058.77 FNMA POOL#0665290 12-Feb-2003 -2,786.85 31391FC30 5.500%10/01/2017 DD 10101/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh �+ Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 20 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 912,058.77 FNMA POOL#0665290 12-Feb-2003 -943,347.46 31391FC30 5.500%10/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-Mar-2003 -5,184,375.00 0IF060642 6.000%04/01/2033 DD 04/01/ 14-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Mar-2003 -2,055,937.50 01 F050445 5.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Mar-2003 -3,083,906.25 0IF050445 5.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 6,286,875.00 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -6,286,875.00 BC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 3,142,500.00 01F060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -3,142,500.00 BC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 6,285,000.00 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -6,285,000.00 BC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhvnrh I� Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 -3,142,500.00 O I F060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 3,142,500.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 -3,142,500.00 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 -6,285,000.00 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 6,285,000.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 -6,285,000.00 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 -6,286,875.00 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 6,286,875.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 -6,286,875.00 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Mar-2003 -2,099,375.00 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2033 DD 04/01/ 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 23-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 22 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Mar-2003 -8,397,500.00 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2033 DD 041011 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 25-Mar-2003 5,148,437.50 01 F060659 6.000%05/01/2033 DD 051011 14-May-2003 -5,148,437.50 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 25-Mar-2003 -5,148,437.50 0IF060659 6.000%05/01/2033 DD 051011 14-May-2003 5,148,437.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT 27-Mar-2003 -1,554,405.83 125581ADO 5.500%11/30/2007 DD 121021 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 27-Mar-2003 -1,670,033.75 441812JW5 6.375%10/15/2011 DD 10/23/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE&CO SUB NT 27-Mar-2003 -3,187,635.00 46625HAT7 5.750%01/02/2013 DD 11/25/0 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN#TR 005 27-Mar-2003 -5,290,548.61 36962GZY3 5.450%01/15/2013 DD 12106/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 01-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhenrh f[I Mellon Trust- Sample Report �I PAGE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL UTILS COOP FI 27-Mar-2003 -3,483,605.00 637432CU7 7.250%03/01/2012 DD 03/07/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB NT 27-Mar-2003 -5,360,162.50 172967BP5 5.625%08/27/2012 DD 08126/0 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CITIGROUP GBL MKTS/SALOMON, 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR N 27-Mar-2003 -3,081,193.75 370425SD3 6.125%08/28/2007 DD 08/29/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 VERIZON GLOBAL FDG CORP GLOB 27-Mar-2003 -3,548,927.50 92344GAT3 7.375%09/01/2012 DD 08/26/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 752,000.00 AIG SUNAMERICA GLO BDS USD 27-Mar-2003 -833,531.84 NA2789454 5.850%01-AUG-2008 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC ABN AMRO SECS LLC,NEW YORK 02-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 135,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 03-Apr-2003 -146,880.00 441812JW5 6.375%10/15/2011 DD 10/23/ 08-Apr-2003 146,880.00 B BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 135,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 03-Apr-2003 4,135.78 441812JW5 6.375%1 011 5/20 1 1 DD 10/23/ 08-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhvnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 24 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 135,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 03-Apr-2003 -151,015.78 441812JW5 6.375%10/15/2011 DD 10/23/ 08-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 08-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 03-Apr-2003 -3,048,750.00 0IF050460 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/ 17-Jun-2003 3,048,750.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 03-Apr-2003 -2,032,500.00 0IF050460 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/011 17-Jun-2003 2,032,500.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Apr-2003 -2,095,937.50 OIN062656 6.500%05/15/2033 DD 051011 21-May-2003 2,095,937.50 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 04-Apr-2003 -8,385,000.00 OIN062656 6.500%05/15/2033 DD 05/01/ 21-May-2003 8,385,000.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 09-Apr-2003 -5,151,562.50 0IF060667 6.000%06/01/2033 DD 06/01/ 12-Jun-2003 5,151,562.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2003 -3,132,187.50 0I F060451 6.000%05/01/2018 DD 051011 19-May-2003 3,132,187.50 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhimrh l� Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2003 -6,264,375.00 0IF060451 6.000%05/01/2018 DD 05/01/ 19-May-2003 6,264,375.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2003 -6,264,375.00 0IF060451 6.000%05/01/2018 DD 05/01/ 19-May-2003 6,264,375.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 COLGATE PALMOLIVE MTN TR 000 16-Apr-2003 -102,332.00 19416QCK4 5.270%12/01/2003 DD 11/24/9 22-Apr-2003 102,332.00 B SPEAR LEEDS&KELLOGG,NEW Y 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 COLGATE PALMOLIVE MTN TR 000 16-Apr-2003 -2,064.08 19416QCK4 5.270%12/01/2003 DD 11/24/9 22-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 COLGATE PALMOLIVE MTN TR 000 16-Apr-2003 -104,396.08 19416QCK4 5.270%12/01/2003 DD 11/24/9 22-Apr-2003 0.00 FC SPEAR LEEDS&KELLOGG,NEW Y 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 25-Apr-2003 -4,085,312.50 0IF050478 5.000%07/01/2018 DD 07/01/ 17-Jul-2003 4,085,312.50 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhanrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report II PAGE: 26 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Jan-2003 -3.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Jan-2003 0.00 FC 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 121,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2003 -121,800.00 9128272M3 3.3 75%01/15/2007 DD 01/151 15-Jan-2003 121,800.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 121,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2003 -121,800.00 9128272M3 3.3 75%01/15/2007 DD 01/151 15-Jan-2003 0.00 FC 30-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Feb-2003 -3.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Apr-2003 -5.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2003 5.50 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Apr-2003 -5.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,422.81 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2003 -14,422.81 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/01/9 01-Apr-2003 14,422.81 PU 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkbenrh f� Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,422.81 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2003 -14,422.81 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 11/0119 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2003 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,088,110.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2003 11,088,110.73 996085247 01-Apr-2003 -11,088,110.73 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,088,110.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2003 11,088,110.73 996085247 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Apr-2003 24,600,000.00 99403R535 01.250%04/02/2003 DD 041011 02-Apr-2003 -24,600,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Apr-2003 854.17 99403R535 01.250%04/02/2003 DD 04/01/ 02-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Apr-2003 24,600,854.17 99403R535 0 1.250%04/02/2003 DD 04/01/ 02-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 02-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhanch Mellon Trust-Sample Report f, PAGE: 28 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 02-Apr-2003 1,492,335.00 38142UU75 07/07/2003 03-Apr-2003 -1,492,335.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 02-Apr-2003 2,835.83 38142UU75 07/07/2003 03-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 02-Apr-2003 1,495,170.83 38142UU75 07/07/2003 03-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 03-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -833,531.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr-2003 833,531.84 996085247 03-Apr-2003 -833,531.84 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -833,531.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr-2003 833,531.84 996085247 03-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 03-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -122,271.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Apr-2003 122,271.71 996085247 08-Apr-2003 -122,271.71 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -122,271.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Apr-2003 122,271.71 996085247 08-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 08-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE. 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,400,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Apr-2003 3,400,000.00 996085247 10-Apr-2003 -3,400,000.00 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,400,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Apr-2003 3,400,000.00 996085247 10-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 10-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 11-Apr-2003 3,400,000.00 99404A283 01.240%04/11/2003 DD 04/10/ 11-Apr-2003 -3,400,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 11-Apr-2003 117.11 99404A283 0 1.240%04/11/2003 DD04110/ 11-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO I1-Apr-2003 3,400,117.11 99404A283 0 1.240%04/11/2003 DD 04/10/ 11-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 1 I-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,070.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Apr-2003 22,070.31 996085247 14-Apr-2003 -22,070.31 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,070.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Apr-2003 22,070.31 996085247 14-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 14-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report , PAGE: 30 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 14-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 9940413448 0 1.200%04/14/2003 DD 04111/ 14-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 14-Apr-2003 170.00 9940413448 0 1.200%04/14/2003 DD 04111/ 14-Apr-2003 0.00 Is 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 14-Apr-2003 1,700,170.00 9940413448 01.200%04/14/2003 DD 04/11/ 14-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 14-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 9940413497 0 1.200%04/14/2003 DD 04/11/ 14-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-Apr-2003 170.00 9940413497 01.200%04/14/2003 DD 04111/ 14-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-Apr-2003 1,700,170.00 9940413497 0 1.200%04/14/2003 DD 04111/ 14-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 14-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 15-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 9940413794 0 1.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ 15-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 15-Apr-2003 59.50 9940413794 01.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ 15-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 15-Apr-2003 1,700,059.50 9940413794 01.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ l 5-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 15-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 99404C941 01.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ 15-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 15-Apr-2003 59.50 99404C941 0 1.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ 15-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 15-Apr-2003 1,700,059.50 99404C941 0 1.260%04/15/2003 DD 04/14/ 15-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -509,364.79 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2003 509,364.79 996085247 16-Apr-2003 -509,364.79 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -509,364.79 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2003 509,364.79 996085247 16-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkbench Mellon Trust-Sample Report I PAGE: 32 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 16-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 99404EO61 0 1.300%04/16/2003 DD 041151 16-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 16-Apr-2003 61.39 99404EO61 0 1.300%04/16/2003 DD 04/15/ 16-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 16-Apr-2003 1,700,061.39 99404EO61 0 1.300%04/16/2003 DD 04/15/ 16-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 16-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 99404EI37 01.300%04/16/2003 DD 041151 16-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 16-Apr-2003 61.39 99404EI37 01.300%04/16/2003 DD 04/15/ 16-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 16-Apr-2003 1,700,061.39 99404EI37 01.300%04/16/2003 DD 04/15/ 16-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 17-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 99404F456 01.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 17-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive " Wnrkhvnrh f Mellon Trust- Sample Report f I PAGE.- -33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 0 -APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 17-Apr-2003 57.14 99404F456 0 1.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 17-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 17-Apr-2003 1,700,057.14 99404F456 0 1.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 17-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 17-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 17-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 9940417654 01.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 17-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 17-Apr-2003 57.14 99404F654 01.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 17-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 17-Apr-2003 1,700,057.14 99404F654 0 1.210%04/17/2003 DD 04/16/ 17-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 17-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,843.58 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Apr-2003 3,843.58 996085247 22-Apr-2003 -3,843.58 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,843.58 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Apr-2003 3,843.58 996085247 22-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 22-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:51:51 Executive Wnrkhvnrh fMellon Trust- Sample Report + PAGE: 34 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0csc00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 22-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 99404G686 01.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 22-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 22-Apr-2003 276.25 99404G686 01.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 22-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 22-Apr-2003 1,700,276.25 99404G686 0 1.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 22-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 22-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 99404G744 01.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 22-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 22-Apr-2003 276.25 99404G744 01.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 22-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 22-Apr-2003 1,700,276.25 99404G744 01.170%04/22/2003 DD 04/17/ 22-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -150,012.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Apr-2003 150,012.73 996085247 23-Apr-2003 -150,012.73 S 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhonrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report 'l PAGE: 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -150,012.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Apr-2003 150,012.73 996085247 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -695,382.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Apr-2003 695,382.39 996085247 23-Apr-2003 -695,382.39 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -695,382.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Apr-2003 695,382.39 996085247 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 23-Apr-2003 1,700,000.00 99404K703 01.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 23-Apr-2003 -1,700,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 23-Apr-2003 55.25 99404K703 01.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 23-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 23-Apr-2003 1,700,055.25 99404K703 01.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROS INC REPO 23-Apr-2003 1,600,000.00 99404Q213 01.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 23-Apr-2003 -1,600,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh f� Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROS INC REPO 23-Apr-2003 52.00 99404Q213 01.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 23-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO -1,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROS INC REPO 23-Apr-2003 1,600,052.00 99404Q213 01.170%04/23/2003 DD 04/22/ 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404MI54 0 1.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 24-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Apr-2003 81.25 99404M 154 01.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 24-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Apr-2003 2,500,081.25 99404M 154 01.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 24-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 24-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 24-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404MI39 01.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 24-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 24-Apr-2003 81.25 99404MI39 0 1.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 24-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhenrh f I Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 24-Apr-2003 2,500,081.25 99404M 139 01.170%04/24/2003 DD 04/23/ 24-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 24-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 25-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404M584 01.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 25-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 25-Apr-2003 81.94 99404M584 01.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 25-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 25-Apr-2003 2,500,081.94 99404M584 0 1.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 25-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 25-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 25-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404N244 01.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 25-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 25-Apr-2003 81.94 99404N244 01.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 25-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 25-Apr-2003 2,500,081.94 99404N244 01.180%04/25/2003 DD 04/24/ 25-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 25-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report _�� PAGE. 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404P546 01.160%04/28/2003 DD 04/25/ 28-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Apr-2003 241.67 99404P546 01.160%04/29/2003 DD 04/25/ 28-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Apr-2003 2,500,241.67 99404P546 01.160%04/28/2003 DD 04/25/ 28-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 28-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404N665 01.160%04/28/2003 DD 04/25/ 28-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 28-Apr-2003 241.67 99404N665 0 1.160%04/28/2003 DD 04/25/ 28-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 28-Apr-2003 2,500,241.67 99404N665 01.160%04/28/2003 DD 04/25/ 28-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 29-Apr-2003 1,000,000.00 99404RI12 01.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/281 29-Apr-2003 -1,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-May 2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhvnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 29-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404Q890 01.220%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 29-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 29-Apr-2003 84.72 99404Q890 01.220%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 29-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 29-Apr-2003 34.17 99404R 112 01.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 29-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 29-Apr-2003 1,000,034.17 99404RI 12 01.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 29-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 29-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 29-Apr-2003 2,500,084.72 99404Q890 01.220%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 29-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 29-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 29-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404RI 12 01.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 29-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 29-Apr-2003 85.42 99404RI 12 01.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/281 29-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhvnrh �+ Melton Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 40 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 29-Apr-2003 2,500,085.42 99404RI 12 0 1.230%04/29/2003 DD 04/28/ 29-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 29-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,294,204.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2003 1,294,204.89 996085247 30-Apr-2003 -1,294,204.89 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,294,204.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2003 1,294,204.89 996085247 30-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 30-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 30-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404S433 01.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 30-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 30-Apr-2003 86.11 99404S433 01.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 30-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 30-Apr-2003 2,500,086.11 99404S433 0 1.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 30-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 30-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 30-Apr-2003 2,500,000.00 99404R393 0 1.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 30-Apr-2003 -2,500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive' Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 30-Apr-2003 86.11 99404R393 0 1.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 30-Apr-2003 0.00 is 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 30-Apr-2003 2,500,086.11 99404R393 01.240%04/30/2003 DD 04/29/ 30-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 30-Apr-2003 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Mar-2003 -5,207,031.25 0IF052441 5.500%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 5,156,250.00 SC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -50,781.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -154,451.63 FNMA POOL#0254402 07-Mar-2003 160,846.89 31371KRXI 5.500%08/01/2017 DD 07/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -159,278.24 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 1,568.65 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -154,451.63 FNMA POOL#0254402 07-Mar-2003 471.94 31371KRXI 5.500%08/01/2017 DD 07/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -154,451.63 FNMA POOL#0254402 07-Mar-2003 161,318.83 31371KRXI 5.500%08/01/2017 DD 07/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -87,841.37 FNMA POOL#0254511 07-Mar-2003 91,478.55 31371KVC2 5.500%11/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -90,586.41 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 892.14 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhanch Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 42 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CS000010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -87,841.37 FNMA POOL#0254511 07-Mar-2003 268.40 31371KVC2 5.500%11/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -87,841.37 FNMA POOL#0254511 07-Mar-2003 91,746.95 31371KVC2 5.500%11/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -840,448.61 FNMA POOL#0511821 07-Mar-2003 875,248.44 31383SSJO 5.500%06/01/2016 DD 06/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -866,712.63 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 8,535.81 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -840,448.61 FNMA POOL#0511821 07-Mar-2003 2,568.04 31383SSJO 5.500%06/01/2016 DD 06/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -840,448.61 FNMA POOL#0511821 07-Mar-2003 877,816.48 31383SSJO 5.500%06/01/2016 DD 06/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -159,451.85 FNMA POOL#0545300 07-Mar-2003 166,054.15 31385HX56 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -164,434.72 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 1,619.43 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -159,451.85 FNMA POOL 40545300 07-Mar-2003 487.21 31385HX56 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhench Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: •43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OM-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -159,451.85 FNMA POOL#0545300 07-Mar-2003 166,541.36 31385HX56 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -109,729.50 FNMA POOL#0545894 07-Mar-2003 114,272.99 31385JNKO 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -113,158.55 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 1,114.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -109,729.50 FNMA POOL#0545894 07-Mar-2003 335.28 31385JNKO 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 Is 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -109,729.50 FNMA POOL#0545894 07-Mar-2003 114,608.27 31385JNKO 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -871,636.59 FNMA POOL#0545904 07-Mar-2003 907,727.79 31385JNV6 5.500%09/01/2017 DD 09/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -898,875.23 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 8,852.56 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -871,636.59 FNMA POOL#0545904 07-Mar-2003 2,663.33 31385JNV6 5.500%09/01/2017 DD 09/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -871,636.59 FNMA POOL#0545904 07-Mar-2003 910,391.12 31385JNV6 5.500%09/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report I PAGE: 44 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -845,448.51 FNMA POOL#0602248 07-Mar-2003 880,455.36 31388EBR6 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 11/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -871,868.78 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 8,586.58 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -845,448.51 FNMA POOL#0602248 07-Mar-2003 2,583.31 31388EBR6 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 11/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -845,448.51 FNMA POOL#0602248 07-Mar-2003 883,038.67 31388EBR6 5.500%11/01/2016 DD 11/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO rNC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -128,264.12 FNMA POOL#0623107 07-Mar-2003 133,575.06 31389EGQ2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 0 1/0 1/ 21-Apr-2003 -132,272.37 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 1,302.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -128,264.12 FNMA POOL#0623107 07-Mar-2003 391.92 31389EGQ2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -128,264.12 FNMA POOL#0623107 07-Mar-2003 133,966.98 31389EGQ2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -890,170.75 FNMA POOL#0626711 07-Mar-2003 927,029.38 31389JGU2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -917,988.59 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 9,040.79 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhvnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 45 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -890,170.75 FNMA POOL#062671 I 07-Mar-2003 2,719.97 31389JGU2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -890,170.75 FNMA POOL#062671 l 07-Mar-2003 929,749.35 31389JGU2 5.500%01/01/2017 DD 01/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -912,058.77 FNMA POOL#0665290 07-Mar-2003 949,823.70 31391FC30 5.500%10/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -940,560.61 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 9,263.09 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -912,058.77 FNMA POOL#0665290 07-Mar-2003 2,786.85 31391FC30 5.500%10/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -912,058.77 FNMA POOL#0665290 07-Mar-2003 952,610.55 31391FC30 5.500%10/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 22-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 20-Mar-2003 2,035,859.38 0IF050445 5.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 20-Mar-2003 3,053,789.06 01 F050445 5.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:SI Executive Wnrkhvnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 46 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 25-Mar-2003 5,162,304.69 01 F060642 6.000%04/01/2033 DD 04/01/ 14-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN#TROOI 02-Apr-2003 300,270.90 38141EED7 VAR RT 08/18/2003 DD 08/16/ 03-Apr-2003 -300,227.10 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 43.80 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN #TROOI 02-Apr-2003 583.00 38141EED7 VAR RT 08/18/2003 DD 08/16/ 03-Apr-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN 4TR001 02-Apr-2003 300,853.90 38141EED7 VAR RT 08/18/2003 DD 08/16/ 03-Apr-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 03-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 03-Apr-2003 2,040,468.75 0IF050452 5.000%05/01/2018 DD 05/01/ 19-May-2003 -2,028,125.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 12,343.75 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 03-Apr-2003 3,060,703.13 0IF050452 5.000%05/01/2018 DD 05/011 19-May-2003 -3,042,187.50 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 18,515.63 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF NITG 04-Apr-2003 8,394,375.00 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2033 DD 04/01/ 23-Apr-2003 -8,397,500.00 S WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW -3,125.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhenrh L� Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 47 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF NITG 04-Apr-2003 8,394,375.00 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2033 DD 04/01/ 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF NITG 04-Apr-2003 2,098,281.25 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2033 DD 04/01/ 23-Apr-2003 -2,099,375.00 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK -1,093.75 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF NITG 04-Apr-2003 2,098,281.25 OIN062649 6.500%04/15/2033 DD 04/01/ 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 09-Apr-2003 5,166,796.88 01 F060659 6.000%05/01/2033 DD 051011 14-May-2003 -5,148,437.50 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 18,359.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2003 6,268,828.13 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -6,285,750.00 S -16,921.87 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2003 6,268,828.13 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2003 3,134,414.06 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -3,142,875.00 S -8,460.94 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkbenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 48 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2003 3,134,414.06 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2003 6,268,828.13 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -6,285,750.00 S -16,921.87 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2003 6,268,828.13 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2018 DD 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 21-Apr-2003 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,338.00 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Mar-2003 1,338.00 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DD 121011 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,832.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Mar-2003 -37,832.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2003 37,872.81 PDC 40.31 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,838.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Mar-2003 37,838.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2003 -37,878.31 PD -40.31 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhanrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report A PAGE: 49 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CS000010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,838.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Mar-2003 37,838.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,135.22 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-Apr-2003 4,135.22 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 03/011 01-Apr-2003 4,239.89 PD -104.67 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,135.22 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-Apr-2003 4,135.22 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 03/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,909.05 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Apr-2003 2,909.05 36210QQE5 6.000%02/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -2,761.32 PD 147.73 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,909.05 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Apr-2003 2,909.05 36210QQE5 6.000%02/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46.66 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Apr-2003 46.66 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2003 44.29 PD 2.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46.66 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Apr-2003 46.66 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:SI Executive Wnrkhnnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report I PAGE: 50 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,696.58 GNMA POOL#0496461 01-Apr-2003 5,696.58 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/'01/ 01-Apr-2003 -5,407.30 PD 289.28 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,696.58 GNMA POOL#0496461 01-Apr-2003 5,696.58 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/'01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -712.09 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Apr-2003 712.09 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 121011 01-Apr-2003 -675.93 PD 36.16 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -712.09 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Apr-2003 712.09 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 12J01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,300.56 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Apr-2003 6,300.56 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -5,980.61 PD 319.95 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,300.56 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Apr-2003 6,300.56 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,624.21 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Apr-2003 1,624.21 36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -1,541.73 PD 82.48 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive' Warkhvnrh I� Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 51 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,624.21 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Apr-2003 1,624.21 3621 OYY90 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -967.54 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Apr-2003 967.54 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -918.41 PD 49.13 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -967.54 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Apr-2003 967.54 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,054.79 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Apr-2003 8,054.79 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DD 03/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -7,645.76 PD 409.03 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,054.79 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Apr-2003 8,054.79 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DD 03/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,141.70 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Apr-2003 3,141.70 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -2,982.16 PD 159.54 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,141.70 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Apr-2003 3,141.70 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhanrh LMellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 52 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,387.10 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-Apr-2003 2,387.10 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -2,265.88 PD 121.22 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,387.10 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-Apr-2003 2,387.10 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,825.69 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Apr-2003 2,825.69 36209CCQ7 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -2,682.20 PD 143.49 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,825.69 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Apr-2003 2,825.69 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,258.64 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Apr-2003 1,258.64 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -1,194.72 PD 63.92 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,258.64 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Apr-2003 1,258.64 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.38 GNMA POOL#0468330 01-Apr-2003 55.38 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -52.57 PD 2.81 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhvnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: -53 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.38 GNMA POOL#0468330 01-Apr-2003 55.38 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05/'01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC l 5-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -48.35 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Apr-2003 48.35 36207PTN9 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05,'01/ 01-Apr-2003 -45.89 PD 2.46 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -48.35 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Apr-2003 48.35 36207PTN9 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05 101/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,960.43 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Apr-2003 18,960.43 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -18,788.60 PD 171.83 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,960.43 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Apr-2003 18,960.43 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,200.26 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-Apr-2003 26,200.26 36225CC20 7.375%06/20/2027 DD 06/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -26,773.39 PD -573.13 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,200.26 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-Apr-2003 26,200.26 36225CC20 7.375%06/20/2027 DD 06/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 21-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report I PAGE: 54 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 1 OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,538.20 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Apr-2003 17,538.20 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/9 01-Apr-2003 -17,828.68 PD -290.48 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,538.20 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Apr-2003 17,538.20 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/9 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -191,068.08 GNMA POOL#0569358 01-Apr-2003 191,068.08 36200QQK3 6.500%04/15/2032 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -195,546.24 PD -4,478.16 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -191,068.08 GNMA POOL#0569358 01-Apr-2003 191,068.08 36200QQK3 6.500%04/15/2032 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,861.17 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Apr-2003 20,861.17 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -19,801.81 PD 1,059.36 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,861.17 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Apr-2003 20,861.17 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,556.78 GNMA POOL#0467286 01-Apr-2003 45,556.78 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2003 43,243.35 PD 2,313.43 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ` Wnrkhanr:h Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: SS PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45,556.78 GNMA POOL#0467286 01-Apr-2003 45,556.78 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,334.40 GNMA POOL 40468339 01-Apr-2003 37,334.40 36209DHQO 6.000%08/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -35,438.51 PD 1,895.89 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,334.40 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Apr-2003 37,334.40 36209DHQO 6.000%08/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -887.29 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Apr-2003 887.29 36209EXR8 6.000%11/15/2028 DD 11/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -842.23 PD 45.06 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -887.29 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Apr-2003 887.29 36209EXR8 6.000%11/15/2028 DD I1/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -270.35 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Apr-2003 270.35 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -263.76 PD 6.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,579.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Apr-2003 34,579.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2003 -34,615.84 PD -36.84 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhench Mellon Trust-Sample Report I PAGE: 56 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETT DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -192,504.07 GNMA II POOL#080408X 01-Apr-2003 192,504.07 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DD 051011 01-Apr-2003 -190,548.95 PD 1,955.12 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -192,504.07 GNMA 11 POOL#080408X 01-Apr-2003 192,504.07 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DD 05/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,189.38 GREYSTONE SVCG CORP FHA#95- 01-Apr-2003 2,189.38 39810#AE4 7.430%06/01/2023 DD 02129/ 01-Apr-2003 -2,157.39 PD 31.99 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,189.38 GREYSTONE SVCG CORD FHA#95- 01-Apr-2003 2,189.38 398104AE4 7.430%06/01/2023 DD 02,/29/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 25-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -228,544.40 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI 1 A6 01-Apr-2003 228,544.40 3133TDPV2 6.500%09/25/2018 01-Apr-2003 -228,645.87 PD -101.47 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -228,544.40 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF Tl l A6 01-Apr-2003 228,544.40 3133TDPV2 6.500%09/25/2018 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 25-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -727.84 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-Apr-2003 727.84 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DD 10121/9 01-Apr-2003 -712.03 PD 15.81 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhvnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report y PAGE: 57 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -727.84 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-Apr-2003 727.84 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DD 10,121/9 01-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,993.06 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-Apr-2003 27,993.06 74046RFW6 6.430%03/08/2004 DD 06,121/9 08-Apr-2003 -28,771.61 PD -778.55 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,993.06 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-Apr-2003 27,993.06 74046RFW6 6.430%03/08/2004 DD 06,121/9 08-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 08-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46,154.20 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Apr-2003 46,154.20 25475MAD6 5.840%10/17/2011 DD 03/18/ 15-Apr-2003 -47,120.56 PI) -966.36 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46,154.20 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Apr-2003 46,154.20 25475MAD6 5.840%10/17/2011 DD 03/18/ 15-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40,925.86 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Apr-2003 40,925.86 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Apr-2003 -40,925.86 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40,925.86 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Apr-2003 40,925.86 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Apr-2003 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2003 0.00 MATURITIES 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhvnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report I PAGE: 58 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 01-Apr-2003 22,999,169.45 313396DU4 MAT 04/01/2003 01-Apr-2003 -22,999,169.45 MT 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 01-Apr-2003 17,499,358.33 313588DU6 MAT 04/01/2003 01-Apr-2003 -17,499,358.33 MT 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,564,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 08-Apr-2003 1,562,678.16 26354BR87 04/08/2003 08-Apr-2003 -1,562,678.16 MT 08-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Apr-2003 15,152,880.00 313384EKI MAT 04/16/2003 16-Apr-2003 -15,152,880.00 MT 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 23-Apr-2003 1,495,412.08 313384ES4 MAT 04/23/2003 23-Apr-2003 -1,495,412.08 MT 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 23-Apr-2003 1,695,200.33 313588ESO 0.000%04/23/2003 DD 04/28/ 23-Apr-2003 -1,695,200.33 MT 23-Apr-2003 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhvnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report 'I PAGE: 59 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 15-Apr-2003 2,000,000.00 073902AH 1 6.750%04/15/2003 15-Apr-2003 -2,031,960.00 MT 15-Apr-2003 -31,960.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 28-Apr-2003 1,000,000.00 79548EEE8 VAR RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2003 -1,000,000.00 MT 28-Apr-2003 0.00 INTEREST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2003 722.02 996085247 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 0 I-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Apr-2003 0.15 996087094 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS 01-Apr-2003 187,500.00 718154CH8 7.500%04/01/2004 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2003 901.06 996085247 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhvnrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 60 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 01-Apr-2003 830.55 313396DU4 MAT 04/01/2003 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 01-Apr-2003 641.67 313588DU6 MAT 04/01/2003 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 550,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS MTN 02-Apr-2003 13,750.00 31331 RC78 5.000%10/02/2003 DD 10/02/ 02-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,564,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 08-Apr-2003 1,321.84 26354BR87 04/08/2003 08-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 08-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,993.06 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-Apr-2003 751.01 74046RFW6 6.430%03/08/2004 DD 06/21/9 08-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 08-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 15-Apr-2003 67,500.00 073902AH 1 6.750%04/15/2003 15-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,635,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 15-Apr-2003 52,115.63 441812JW5 6.375%10/15/2011 DD 10/23/ 15-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive ' Wnrkhanrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report J PAGE: 61 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,338.00 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 15-Apr-2003 330.12 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DD 12101/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,141.70 GNMA POOL#0483452 15-Apr-2003 129.10 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,135.22 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 15-Apr-2003 1,019.68 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 03/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 712.09 GNMA POOL#0486720 15-Apr-2003 84.61 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 12./01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 191,068.08 GNMA POOL 40569358 15-Apr-2003 14,048.68 36200QQK3 6.500%04/15/2032 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,300.56 GNMA POOL#0491103 15-Apr-2003 893.06 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,696.58 GNMA POOL#0496461 15-Apr-2003 3,332.09 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 0 1/0 1/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 62 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46.66 GNMA POOL#0497343 15-Apr-2003 16I.81 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,909.05 GNMA POOL#0499153 15-Apr-2003 112.44 36210QQE5 6.000%02/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 967.54 GNMA POOL#0500917 I5-Apr-2003 72.56 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/011 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,054.79 GNMA POOL#0503388 15-Apr-2003 2,733.63 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DD 031011 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,624.21 GNMA POOL#0506636 15-Apr-2003 262.76 36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,154.20 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Apr-2003 955.57 25475MAD6 5.840%10/17/201 I DD 03/18/ 15-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,838.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 15-Apr-2003 5,302.84 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhvn-h Mellon Trust-Sample Report 'I PAGE: 63 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 15-Apr-2003 5.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48.35 GNMA POOL#0438057 15-Apr-2003 181.98 36207PTN9 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05101/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,387.10 GNMA POOL#0457814 15-Apr-2003 304.79 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,861.17 GNMA POOL#0465546 15-Apr-2003 3,617.09 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,258.64 GNMA POOL#0465555 15-Apr-2003 3,711.20 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,825.69 GNMA POOL#0467279 15-Apr-2003 166.60 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,556.78 GNMA POOL#0467286 15-Apr-2003 3,112.01 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 64 0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55.38 GNMA POOL#0468330 15-Apr-2003 161.05 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,334.40 GNMA POOL#0468339 15-Apr-2003 3,148.67 36209DHQO 6.000%08/15/2028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 887.29 GNMA POOL#0469688 15-Apr-2003 138.53 36209EXR8 6.000%11/15/2028 DD 11/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-Apr-2003 47,120.00 313384EK1 MAT 04/16/2003 16-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,925.86 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Apr-2003 1,582.99 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,422.81 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 16-Apr-2003 14,422.81 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11101/9 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,538.20 GNMA II POOL#0080023 21-Apr-2003 1,644.60 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/9 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 21-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkbanrh Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 65 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2003-30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,200.26 GNMA II POOL#080088M 21-Apr-2003 2,313.62 36225CC20 7.375%06/20/2027 DD 06/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,960.43 GNMA II POOL#0080395 21-Apr-2003 1,550.42 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 192,504.07 GNMA[I POOL#080408X 21-Apr-2003 14,127.03 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DD 051011 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 21-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 23-Apr-2003 4,587.92 313384ES4 MAT 04/23/2003 23-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 23-Apr-2003 4,799.67 313588ESO MAT 04/23/2003 DD 04/28/02 23-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 23-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,189.38 GREYSTONE SVCG CORD FHA#95- 25-Apr-2003 7,421.31 39810#AE4 7.430%06/01/2023 DD 02/29/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 228,544.40 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF Tl 1 A6 25-Apr-2003 7,389.93 3133TDPV2 6.500%09/25/2018 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhonrh IMellon Trust-Sample Report I PAGE.- 66 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CSG00010000 01-APR-2003 -30-APR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 28-Apr-2003 3,998.45 79548EEE8 VAR RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/28/ 28-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 727.84 WMP/HUNTOON PAGGE #000-11150 28-Apr-2003 5,954.10 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DD 10/21/9 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IT 28-Apr-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 30-Apr-2003 -99.87 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 30-Apr-2003 0.00 CW 30-Apr-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Apr-2003 121,800.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DD 0I 1151 0.00 CD 30-Apr-2003 0.00 07-May-2003 13:52:51 Executive Wnrkhenrh FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 05/14/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-32 14 d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: THIRD QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file FY 2002-03 Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended March 31 , 2003. SUMMARY Attached in a separately bound document is the District's Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended March 31 , 2003. This report is a consolidation of the financial accomplishments of the District through the end of the third quarter of FY 2002-03. Contained within the Third Quarter Financial Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating Fund, the Capital Improvement Program, the Revenue Areas, and the Self-Insurance Funds. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 70.81 percent, or 546.33 million of the 2002-03 net joint operating budget of $65.42 million has been expended. Net expense has increased S9.38 million, or 25.37 percent in comparison with the same period last year primarily due to the increased level of wastewater treatment with full disinfection. The total cost per million gallons at March 31 , 2003 is $709.63 based on flows of 65.28 billion gallons, or 238.26 million gallons per day. This is $7.32, or 1 .02 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of $716.95. This shortfall is primarily due to expenditures being lower than budget by 5.58 percent, or S2.74 million. This expenditure shortfall is somewhat offset by the fact that flows are 4.70 percent lower than the budget estimate of 250 million gallons per day. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\Item 14)d).3rd Quarter Financial Report.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. FY 2002-03 Third Quarter Financial Report for the period Ended March 31, 2003. G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\Item 14(d).3rd Ouarter Financial Report.doc Revised: 8/20I98 Page 2 i FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 05/14/03 05/28/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-33 14(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1 , 2003 THROUGH MARCH 31 , 2003 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2003 through March 31 , 2003. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies" are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) G:\wp.dta\agenda\FAHR\FAHR2003\0503103-33.0.Investment Management Repon.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Service Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also attached are Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Summary of Performance Data and Portfolio Statistics charts that depict the performance results, estimated yield and duration, credit quality, and sector diversification of the District's portfolios, as of December 31 , 2002 and March 31 , 2003. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as compared to their benchmarks for the period January 1 through March 31 , 2003. Portfolio Performance Summary Quarter Ended March 31,2003 Liquid Operating Monies(°o) Long-Term Operating Monies(40) Total Rate Total Rate of of Return Benchmark"' Return Benchmark!" 3 Months 0.35 0.30 1.17 1.13 6 Months 0.87 0.69 2.25 2.50 9 Months 1.34 1.12 5.80 6.02 12 Months 2.01 1.56 8.88 9.25 Since inception 30 Sept.95 5.01 4.49 6.91 6.86 Market Value S49.6M $325.OM Average Quality "AAA" ;'AAA- Current Yield(°o) 3.9 4.1 Estimated Yield to Maturity(oo) 1.3 2.6 Quarterly Deposits(Withdrawals) $05.OM) $O.OM Estimated Annual Income $1.91`0 $12.7M (1) Benchmarks: • Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index ■ Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt. 1-5 Year Bond Index Portfolio Market Values Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the following table, and in the attached bar chart. Liquid Long-Term Quarter Operating Operating Ending Monies($M) Monies($M) 30 June 02 43.9 366.1 30 Sept.02 44.1 317.8 31 Dec.02 64.3 321.2 31 Mar.03 49.6 325.0 G:\wp.dta\agendaTAHR\FAHR2003\0503\03.33.0.Investment Management Report.doc Revised: a/20/98 Page 2 District's Investment Account Balances as of March 31, 2003 Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts March 31,2003 Yield (%) State of Calif. LAW $ 13,484,844 1.90 Union Bank Checking Account 4,793,778 1.16 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 49,016,216 1.51 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 321,783,364 2.64 Petty Cash 5,000 N/A TOTAL $3a9.083.202 Debt Service Reserves w/Trustees $34,706,388 4.36 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Historical Yield Curve Graph 2. PIMCO 1st Quarter 2003 Report 3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart 4. Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Characteristics Charts (2) 5. Net Asset Sector Summary as of March 31, 2003 — Liquid Operating Portfolio 6. Net Asset Sector Summary as of March 31, 2003— Long Term Portfolio 7. Investment Listing of Liquid Operating and Long Term Portfolios as of March 31, 2003 (Yield Analysis Report). 8. Investment Transactions and Balances in LAW as of March 31, 2003 9. Callan Report (separate bound document) 10. PIMCO Report (separate bound document) G:\wp.dta\agenda\FAHR\FAHR2003\0503\03.33.0.Investmenl Management Repon.dx Revised: 8/20198 Page 3 HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 5.25 .. ..........................................................______._._—_._--_.___._ 5.00 a.7s a.50 I 4.25 a.0o 3.75 3.50 �? 3.25 c 3.00 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 n eo --t 30-Sep-02 —r 31-Dec-02 i—31-Mar-03 0 P I M C 0 April28,2003 Mr.Mike White Controller Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Administration Building Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Re: I`Quarter 2003 Report Dear Mike: The following is a description of events in the bond markets during the I`quarter of 2003 and an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term and Liquid portfolios over the period. We have also included a section on strategies to be pursued in your portfolios during the coming months. Bond Market Recap: Market Recap:Investors Broaden Their Appetite For Bonds The flight to safe assets such as Treasuries that characterized financial markets for much of last year broadened into a move toward higher yielding fixed income securities in the first quarter. Investors were dissatisfied with money market and Treasury yields near 40-year lows but remained nervous about stocks amid weak economic growth and geopolitical uncertainty. As a result, capital flocked to U.S. corporate and emerging market bonds that offered substantial yield premiums relative to the safest assets and lower volatility than stocks. Strong funds flows helped these fixed income sectors outperform the broader bond and stock markets. The broad U.S. bond market, represented by the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index, gained 1.39 percent during the quarter,held back by weakness in Treasuries.Treasury yields were volatile as investor sentiment regarding safe assets shifted back and forth depending on news about the war with Iraq. For the full quarter, two-year yields fell 12 basis points but yields on other maturities wound up little changed. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield closed 2 basis points lower at 3.80 percent. A critical question as the quarter drew to a close was whether the sluggish U.S.economy,long the engine of growth worldwide,would revive once the situation in Iraq became clarified.Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan took the optimistic side of this debate. The Fed left the federal funds rate unchanged despite slumping employment,retail sales and consumer confidence.With short-term rates already so low, it was unclear how much additional Fed easing would help.After 525 basis points in cuts since 2001,the federal funds rate stood at 1.25 percent, which meant that the real, or inflation-adjusted rate was below zero. 0 Higher Yielding Bond Sectors Outperform In First Quarter The following is a summary of fixed income sector performance: • Mortgages held up well despite heightened volatility. While nominal mortgage returns modestly lagged Treasuries, mortgages outperformed on a like-duration basis. Strong demand from banks caused mortgage yield premiums to tighten modestly. Less prepayment sensitive lower coupons outperformed as refinancings reached record levels. Volatility surged late in the quarter. During one 15-day span in March,rates jumped 9 straight days for 51 basis points and then dropped the next six days for 36 basis points. • Corporate bonds, especially BBB-rated and high yield issues, outperformed. Credit premiums tightened as demand for corporates grew even as stock returns languished. Companies continued to pursue strategies favorable to bondholders, i.e., restraint in capital budgets and balance sheet repair. The supply/demand balance was favorable with new issuance relatively light and funds flows strong. • Emerging market bonds had a solid start to 2003, outperforming all other bond sectors except the lowest rated corporates. The main drivers included growing awareness of stronger economic fundamentals in countries such as Brazil,significant cash inflows and higher commodity prices. • Eurozone and Japanese government bond markets outperformed Treasuries as growth prospects for these economies remained bleaker than for the U.S. The European Central Bank cut its main interest rate by only 25 basis points to 2.5 percent, leaving the ECB well behind the Fed in its easing cycle. Although Japanese short-term rates are near zero,longer-term yields fell more than 40 basis points. Performance Attribution: Long Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District turned in a 1.17 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 4 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: • Near-index duration was neutral for returns • A broader-than-index yield curve structure was negative as the longest maturities underperformed during the quarter • Modest emphasis on lower duration mortgages was positive;yield premiums tightened despite a volatile market due to strong bank demand • A corporate allocation was positive as corporates outperformed;our focus on telecom bonds helped returns as these issues rallied amid rising confidence in their improved credit fundamentals • An allocation to real return bonds was positive as most real yields fell amid strong demand from retail investors • Asset-backed bonds modestly detracted from returns as the sector overall was weighed down by credit concerns in the manufactured housing and credit card segments • An allocation to real return bonds was slightly positive as less volatile real yields did not climb as much as Treasury yields 2 Liquid Portfolio The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District turned in a 0.35 percent return over the quarter,outperforming the 3 month Treasury Bill Index by 5 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: . • Duration longer than the benchmark had a minor impact on performance as short-term rates were little changed • Corporates enhanced returns;telecom and energy pipeline holdings gained amid rising demand for higher yielding bonds • Holdings of high quality commercial paper and agency discount notes contributed to returns Economic Outlook: Outlook Uncertain;Global Imbalances Constrain Growth Concern about war with Iraq and its aftermath makes the macroeconomic environment unusually difficult to forecast. Geopolitical uncertainty could create considerable volatility in financial markets over the next year, but no matter how this uncertainty is resolved, the pre-existing problem of excess capacity worldwide will persist and crimp growth. The U.S. economy will expand by only 2-2.5 percent, while Europe and Japan will be hard pressed to grow at all.Yields on l0-year Treasuries will range between 3.5 and 4.5 percent, with the potential to pierce the low end of the range if geopolitical circumstances deteriorate and test the high end if the situation in Iraq improves. Key elements of our cyclical forecast are the following: • Demand in the U.S. will hold up better than in other major economies.The weakest part of the U.S. economy - the corporate sector - has pared capital investment, inventories and employees after the excesses of the late 1990s to restore credibility with lenders. This corporate thrift has pressured employment and wages,but it has not dragged down consumption. • Adverse effects on U.S. household income and spending have been and will continue to be mitigated by consumers' ability to monetize housing wealth at mortgage rates near 40-year lows. This option, created by more than 500 basis points of Federal Reserve easing over the last two years,remains in- the-money for many homeowners.The Fed will not take such a valuable option away any time soon. • The outlook is bleaker in Europe and Japan. In these economies,painful consequences of corporate thrift will not be mitigated by effective reflationary policy such as that provided by the Fed. Europe is on the brink of recession,as disillusioned investors and skeptical credit rating agencies force balance sheet rehabilitation on companies that lag far behind their American counterparts in cost cutting. Japan's moribund economy will not recover so long as its companies continue to save and not spend, using cash flow to pay down debt and cutting employees where they can. • Rising commodity prices and a weaker dollar will push inflation modestly higher, creating a mildly stagflationary environment. Higher prices will be good for commodity exporters in the emerging markets,but will impose a negative terms of trade shock on developed economies. 3 Y Strategy:Minimize Risk To Macroeconomic Volatility PIMCO will minimize risk and take exposures where prospects for attractive returns significantly outweigh downside potential. We will limit interest rate risk in two ways: by targeting duration near the index and by emphasizing short and long maturities to guard against a sell-off in overvalued intermediate maturities. In sector strategies,we will trim exposures that have recently fared well.Relatively high yields and strong credit quality make mortgages an attractive long-term holding.Nevertheless,recent gains make this sector vulnerable to a correction,so we will target near-index mortgage exposure in the short run.We will remain underweight to corporates overall, especially higher rated bonds offering slim credit premiums,and aim for near to above-index weightings in more attractively priced issues. Where permitted,we will retain modest exposures to Eurozone bonds and emerging market securities that have significant upside despite strong performance over the past six months. Eurozone issues,especially short maturities, do not fully discount the weakness in these economies. Emerging market bonds offer attractive yields and improving credit fundamentals. The following list highlights the strategies that will be used in the Long Term portfolio in the coming months: • Minimize exposure to war-related volatility and pursue value where return prospects significantly outweigh downside risk • Target duration near the index to limit interest rate risk • Retain a broader-than-index maturity structure to enhance yield and exploit values all along the yield curve • Retain reduced emphasis on mortgages.Relatively high yields and strong credit quality make mortgages attractive for the long run,but given record low mortgage rates the sector is vulnerable to a correction if rates should rise • Add value by selecting corporate issues with attractive yield premiums and sold credit fundamentals • Retain holdings of real return bonds,whose high credit quality and inflation protection should allow them to perform well in both optimistic and pessimistic geopolitical scenarios • Hold high quality asset-backed securities to benefit from their strong collateral protection and attractive yields • Seek opportunities to selectively add high quality municipal bonds to exploit unusual values with yields near those of Treasuries The following list highlights the strategies that will be used in the Liquid portfolio in the coming months: • Minimize risk to economic volatility and pursue value where return prospects significantly outweigh downside risk • Maintain modestly extended duration to generate incremental yield • Emphasize corporates with a focus on issues with attractive yield premiums and solid credit fundamentals • Maintain holdings of high quality commercial paper and agency discount notes to add value and liquidity to the portfolio 4 'v We hope you find this information useful. Please feel free to call us with any questions. Sincerely, Christine Telish,CFA John M.Miller,CFA Vice President Senior Vice President 5 OCSU Invest—A Mmmgemmt Program Quarter End Portfolio Vd— (MxkWddMarket) srao.aoo.aa0 9350.000.000 s3oD.aoD.aaO 6250.000.000 $200.000.000 s150.000.0DD $100.000.000 S50.000.000 w 31 D-01 31M 02 30 Jw 02 30 Sap 02 310.02 31 Mar 03 OLgW40prt ng Mvrssr ULe T�Z-p "M— Summary of Performance Data and Portfolio Statistics Orange County Sanitation District 5-Year Return vs.Standard Deviation 11 10 X 9 Salomon Performance • •• 10-Yr.Strip .. .•• 11 1 • • • • 0 8 •. 7 E ML 1-3 Yr. Total Portfolio' d s • treasury Before Fees(%) 5.01 4.72 4.22 2.01 1.34 0.87 0.35 rr After Fees(%) 4.87 4.58 4.08 1.86 1.24 0.80 0.32 �N S •Portfolio c 4 ♦Index c 3 Salomon 3 Month T-Bill Index(%)2 4.49 4.09 3.54 1.56 1.12 0.69 0.30 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Standard Deviation of Return (%) %of Market Value %of Duration :Summary Information Sector Allocation11 11rim 11 11 Total Market Value($MM) 64.3 49.6 Government 20 31 28 59 Quarterly Contributions($MM) 20.0 -15.0 Mortgages 0 0 0 0 Estimated Annual Income($MM) 1.7 1.9 Corporates 10 15 17 16 Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 1.6 1.3 High Yield 0 0 0 0 Estimated Duration(yrs) 0.2 0.3 Non U.S.$Developed 0 0 0 0 Average Maturity(yrs) 0.2 0.3 Emerging Markets 0 0 0 0 Average Quality AAA AAA Other 0 0 0 0 Average Coupon(%) 2.6 3.9 Net Cash Money Markets 70 54 55 25 Tracking Error(3 yrs.,%)3 0.2 0.2 Total 100 100 100 100 Information Ratio(3 yrs.)° 3.6 3.3 See footnotes in Appendix. Summary of Performance Data and Portfolio Statistics Orange County Sanitation District Long Term Portfolio 5-Year Return vs.Standard Deviation 10 9 Performance 8 Salomon Peltiods Ended 3/31/2003 Index 10•Yrs Strip c 7 Total Portfolio' ; Portfolio Before Fees(%) 6.91 6.90 8.08 8.88 5.80 2.25 1.17 6 CU After Fees(%) 6.76 6.74 7.92 8.71 5.68 2.17 1.13 "- ro 5 c Merrill 1-5 Yr Gov't Corp. (%) c ° 2 6.86 7.00 8.54 9.25 6.02 2.50 1.13 4 A M1-3 3 2 --' -- , 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Standard Deviation of Return z('%) %of Market Value %of Duration • • 11 Irrom - . I • !111M. 111111 11 11 11 11 Total Market Value($MM) 321.2 325.0 Government 67 46 79 55 Quarterly Contributions($MM) 0.0 0.0 Mortgages 15 15 11 12 Estimated Annual Income($MM) 16.0 12.7 Corporates 8 16 7 30 Estimated Yield to Maturity(°a) 2.5 2.6 High Yield 0 0 0 0 Estimated Duration(yrs) 2.2 2.3 Non U.S.$Developed 0 0 0 0 Benchmark Duration(yrs) 2.3 2.3 Emerging Markets 0 0 0 0 Average Maturity(yrs) 2.6 2.7 Other 0 0 0 0 Average Quality AAA AAA Net Cash Equivalents 10 23 3 3 Average Coupon(%) 5.5 4.1 Total 100 100 100 100 Tracking Error(3 yrs., %)3 0.6 0.6 Information Ratio(3 yrs.)4 -0.5 -0.5 See footnotes in Appendix. Mellon Trust Report PAGE: 'I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-MAR-2003 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 3,154,638.66 3,154,638.66 6.37% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 7,708,718.88 7,708,718.88 15.56% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN 1 YR 6,370,679.27 6,370,679,27 12.86% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 7,820,447.72 7,820,447.72 15.78% 0.00 OTHER U.S.GOVT OBLIGATIONS 945,518.61 845,518.61 1.71% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 178,546.39 178,546.39 0.36% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 26,078,549.53 26,078,549.53 52.63% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 26,078,549.53 26,078,549.53 52.63% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 6,251,984.38 6,184,250.00 12.48% -67,734.38 U.S.AGENCIES 9,379,081.35 9,313,449.28 18.80% -65,632.07 BANKING&FINANCE 5,276,887.61 5,210,168.26 10.51% -66,719.35 INDUSTRIAL 1,567,497.81 1,556,541.93 3.14% -10,955.88 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 677,046.50 673,257.00 1.36% -3,789.50 TOTAL UNITED STATES 23,152,497.65 22,937,666.47 46.29% -214,831.18 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 23,152,497.65 22,937,666.47 46.29% -214,831.18 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 535,841.40 535,841.40 1.08% 0.00 TOTAL 535,841.40 535,841.40 1.08% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 535,841.40 535,841.40 1.08% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO 49,766,888.58 49,552,057.40 100.00% -214,831.18 ASSETS - pr- Executive workbench !L Mellon Trust Report fl PAGE. �1 0 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-MAR-2003 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 6.50 6.50 0.00% 0.00 RECEIVABLES 15,498,154.88 15,498,154.88 4.77% 0.00 PAYABLES -79,920,519.03 -79,920,519.03 -24.61% 0.00 TOTAL -64,422,35 7.65 -64,422,3 57.65 -19.83% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 3,187,904.00 3,187,904.00 0.98% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 36,941,995.00 36,967,131.37 11.38% 25,136.37 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 32,834,616.69 32,834,616.69 10.11% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 17,844,576.25 17,847,027.16 5.49% 2,450.91 MUTUAL FUNDS 12,140,279.19 12,140,279.19 3.74% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 102,949,371.13 102,976,958.41 31.70% 27,587.28 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 38,527,013.48 38,554,600.76 11.87% 27,587.28 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 89,082,570.88 89,794,111.09 27.65% 711,540.21 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 14,1 19,622.69 17,663,888.73 5.44% 3,544,266.04 U.S.AGENCIES 43,214,290.34 46,213,756.96 14.23% 2,999,466.62 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 17,389,331.52 17,898,231.84 5.51% 508,900.32 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 5,023,129.66 5,162,808.53 1.59% 139,678.87 FHLMC POOLS 266,541.50 274,554.68 0.08% 8,013.18 FHLMC MULTICLASS 2,788,255.41 2,807,448.87 0.86% 19,193.46 FNMA POOLS 25,933,125.00 25,971,484.50 8.00% 38,359.50 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 2,938,118.80 3,117,976.70 0.96% 279,857.90 ABS:CAR LOAN 144,054.92 141,098.53 0.04% -2,956.39 ABS:AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.00 336,000.00 0.10% -1,264,000.00 BANKING&FINANCE 40,929,899.50 41,466,463.50 12.77% 536,564.00 INDUSTRIAL 17,792,380.00 17,869,310.00 5.50% 76,930.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 6,438,210.00 7,026,855.00 2.16% 588,645.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 6,594,240.00 6,652,950.00 2.05% 58,710.00 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE BONDS 826,199.84 831,824.80 0.26% 5,624.96 pr_ Executive wor0ench IL- Mellon Trust Report PAGE: 2 (& BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-MAR-2003 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS TOTAL UNITED STATES 274,979,970.06 283,228,763.73 87.20% 8,248,793.67 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 274,979,970.06 283,228,763.73 87.20% 8,248,793.67 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,026,962.92 3,026,962.92 0.93% 0.00 TOTAL 3,026,962.92 3,026,962.92 0.93% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,026,962.92 3,026,962.92 0.93% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO 316,533,946.46 324,810,327.41 100.00% 8,276,380.95 ASSETS _ pr_ ecu cve r enc . YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 1 OCSF07511102 2003/03/31 RUN DATE s 04/08/03 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,564,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.915 1,562,678.16 5.99 26354BR87 04/08/2003 1,562,678.16 3.19 500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYSTEM .000 .000 P-1 99.509 497,544.44 1.90 313312FE5 MAT 05/05/2003 A-1+ 497,544.44 1.02 750,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYSTEM .000 .000 P-1 99.404 745,531.25 2.85 313312GKO MAT 06/03/2003 A-1+ 745,531.25 1.52 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.707 997,073.61 3.82 313384FW4 MAT 05/21/2003 A-1+ 997,073.61 2.03 1,865,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK DISCOUNT NT .000 .000 P-1 99.412 1,854,040.02 7.10 313384GFO MAT 05/30/2003 A-1+ 1,854,040.02 3.78 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.450 497,248.33 1.90 313384HAO MAT 06/18/2003 A-1+ 497,248.33 1.01 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.399 1,997,986.11 7.62 313384HV4 MAT 07/07/2003 A-1+ 1,987,986.11 4.06 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.364 2,484,099.65 9.52 313384BX0 MAT 07/09/2003 A-1+ 2,484,099.65 5.07 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.682 498,4ll.25 1.91 313396PQI MAT 05/15/2003 A-1+ 498,411.25 1.02 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.422 4,971,111.11 19.06 313396FX6 MAT 05/22/2003 A-1+ 4,971,111.11 10.14 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.612 996,120.83 3.81 313396GF4 MAT 05/30/2003 A-1+ 996,120.83 2.03 1,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.718 1,695,200.33 6.50 31358SESO 0.000% 04/23/2003 DD 04/28/02 A-1+ 1,695,200.33 3.46 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.474 497,371.81 1.90 313588GT6 MAT 06/11/2003 A-1+ 497,371.81 1.01 800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.395 795,156.00 3.04 313588HQI MAT 07/02/2003 A-1+ 795,156.00 1.62 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSF07511102 2003/03/31 RUN DATE t 04/08/03 DISTRICT= LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE t 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.625 99,625.50 .38 36959JTB9 06/11/2003 99,625.50 .20 1,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.489 1,492,335.00 5.72 38142UU75 07/07/2003 1,492,335.00 3.04 850,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.473 845,510.61 3.24 863672FQS MAT 05/15/2003 A-1+ 845,518.61 1.72 178,546.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 1.086 AAA 100.000 178,546.39 .68 996085247 AAA 178,546.39 .36 3,402,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 1.439 .000 P-1 99.440 3,382,951.13 12.97 313588FG5 05/07/2003 A-1+ 3,382,951.13 6.90 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .019 .002 26,078,549.53 100.00 26,078,549.53 53.18 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH SR NT .000 1.600 AA1 100.031 1,502,520.00 6.54 046003KHI FLTG RT 05/08/2003 DD 05/08/00 AA- 1,500,465.00 3.06 650,000.00 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC .000 5.672 AA3 103.578 677,046.50 2.93 077858AA6 5.875% 02/01/2004 DD 02/01/94 A+ 673,257.00 1.37 200,000.00 COLGATE PALMOLIVE MTN TR 00058 .000 5.134 AA3 102.640 206,476.00 .89 19416QCK4 5.270% 12/01/2003 DD 11/24/98 AA- 205,280.00 .42 1,350,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS SYSTE .000 5.224 AAA 103.360 1,399,963.50 6.08 31331H6G7 6.40% 01/23/2004 DD O1/01/1999 AAA 1,395,354.20 2.85 550,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS MTN .000 4.907 AAA 101.895 565,229.50 2.44 31331RC78 5.000% 10/02/2003 DD 10/02/98 AAA 560,424.26 1.14 650,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEBS .000 7.316 AAA 100.784 657,377.50 2.85 3134A34H6 7.375% 05/15/2003 DD 04/26/00 AAA 655,097.04 1.34 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS .000 4.959 AAA 103.340 3,321,088.00 14.41 31359MEMI 5.125% 02/13/2004 DD 02/08/99 AAA 3,306,883.20 6.75 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE S 3 OCSF07511102 2003/03/31 RUN DATE s 04/08/03 DISTRICTi LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 533,000.00 GENERAL ELEC MTN #TR 00454 .000 7.421 AAA 101.062 544,976.51 2.34 36962GUXO 7.500% 06/05/2003 DD 06/05/00 A-2 538,660.46 1.10 250,000.00 GILLETTE CO NT .000 6.135 AA3 101.875 256,012.50 1.11 375766AC6 6.250% 08/15/2003 DD 08/16/93 AA- 254,687.50 .52 300,000.00 GOLDMAN SACBS GRP MTN #TR00100 .000 1.589 AA3 100.078 300,227.10 1.30 38141EED7 VAR RT 08/18/2003 DD 08/16/00 A+ 300,234.00 .61 500,000.00 PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC NTS .000 6.231 AA2 103.515 519,405.00 2.25 695629CE3 6.450% 12/01/2003 DD 12/01/98 AA+ 517,575.00 1.06 656,000.00 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO NTS .000 5.156 AA3 101.828 672,278.56 2.91 742718BK4 5.250% 09/15/2003 DD 09/28/98 AA- 667,991.68 1.36 5,800,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 000 11.137 AAA 106.625 6,251,984.38 26.96 91281ODGO 11.875% 11/15/2003 DD 10/05/83 AAA 6,184,250.00 12.62 425,000.00 WAL MART STORES INC .000 6.446 AA2 100.043 432,730.75 1.86 931142AQ6 6.500% 06/01/2003 AA 428,582.75 .87 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROME LN MTG CORP DEBS 1.454 4.469 AAA 100.690 1,018,200.00 4.38 3134A4FF6 4.500% 06/15/2003 DD 06/15/01 AAA 1,006,896.80 2.05 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 1.517 4.460 AAA 100.896 2,039,880.00 8.79 3133MGSJI 4.500% 07/07/2003 DD 07/06/01 AAA 2,017,917.60 4.12 450,000.00 WELLS FARGO & CO SUBNT 1.615 5.957 AA3 102.812 467,496.00 2.01 949740BY9 6.125% 11/01/2003 DD 11/01/93 A 462,654.00 .94 150,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS MTN 1.664 6.418 AAA 102.061 155,796.00 .66 32331NW59 6.550% 08/19/2003 DD 08/19/96 AAA 153,091.05 .31 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 1.664 5.022 AAA 101.776 103,311.00 .44 3133H55B2 5.925% 08/14/2003 DD 08/14/98 AAA 101,776.01 .21 1,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DW MTN #TR00349 1.757 6.977 AA3 102.125 1,045,350.00 4.45 61745EQN4 7.125% 08/15/2003 DD Ott/10/00 AA- 1,021,250.00 2.08 100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 1.917 6.657 AAA 100.799 102,765.00 .43 31364CDD7 6.710% 05/21/2003 DD 05/21/96 AAA 100,799.30 .21 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO & CO NEW NT 1.949 7.160 AA2 100.453 560,601.00 2.36 949740CH5 7.200% 05/01/2003 DD 04/26/00 A+ 542,446.20 1.11 I YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 4 OCSF07511102 2003/03/31 RUN DATE s 04/08/03 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME s 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S—P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 324,000.00 BANKAMERICA CORP SUB HT 2.372 6.814 AA3 100.990 336,312.00 1.42 066050BZ7 6.875% 06/01/2003 DD 06/01/93 A 326,883.60 .67 15,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 2.751 5.917 AAA 101.399 15,470.85 .06 3133M4VC4 6.000% 07/14/2003 DD 07/14/98 AAA 15,209.82 .03 ---- ------ ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES .203 6.272 23,152,497.65 100.00 22,937,666.47 46.80 --- --- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL .122 3.495 49,231,047.18 100.00 49,016,216.00 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE t 04/08/03 DISTRICTt LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE $ TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 15,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.690 15,152,980.00 14.71 313384EK1 HAT 04/16/2003 A-1+ 15,152,880.00 3.92 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.694 1,495,412.08 1.45 313384ES4 MAT 04/23/2003 A-1+ 1,495,412.08 .39 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 000 .000 P-1 99.895 1,196,284.17 1.16 313384FG9 MAT 05/07/2003 A-l+ 1,198,735.08 .31 23,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.996 22,999,169.45 22.33 313396DU4 HAT 04/01/2003 A-1+ 22,999,169.45 5.96 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN NTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.790 997,902.22 .96 313396FY4 MAT 05/23/2003 A-1+ 997,902.22 .26 13,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.770 12,944,923.33 12.59 313396HG1 MAT 06/24/2003 A-1+ 12,970,059.70 3.36 17,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.996 17,499,358.33 16.99 313588DU6 HAT 04/01/2003 A-1+ 17,499,359.33 4.53 9,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.473 8,654,172.75 9.40 313588FP5 HAT 05/14/2003 A-1+ 8,654,172.75 2.24 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.749 2,194,473.11 2.13 31358SCRO MAT 06/09/2003 A-1+ 2,194,473.11 .57 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.702 4,486,612.50 4.35 313588HH1 MAT 06/25/2003 A-1+ 4,486,612.50 1.16 3,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.622 3,187,904.00 3.09 36959JTC7 06/22/2003 3,187,904.00 .83 12,140,279.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 1.086 AAA 100.000 12,140,279.19 11.78 996085247 AAA 12,140,279.19 3.14 ------ ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 .019 102,949,371.13 100.00 102,976,958.41 26.67 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE s 04/00/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME s 09.36.44 __-_--__�___"---------------------------------------------------------------�--____�___------oo=-v-a�ascaaoccaac�.-aoaaa=a=oao PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 752,000.00 AIG SUNAHERICA GLO BDS USD .000 5.289 110.615 826,199.84 .29 NA2789454 5.850% 01-AUG-2008 831,824.80 .22 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNHA SF MTG .000 4.888 AAA 102.281 5,070,312.50 1.80 0IF050452 5.000% 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 AAA 5,114,062.50 1.32 15,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG .000 5.736 AAA 104.594 15,714,375.00 5.53 0IF060444 6.000% 04/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 AAA 15,689,062.50 4.06 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG .000 5.805 AAA 103.367 5,140,437.50 1.82 0IF060659 6.000% 05/01/2033 DD 05/01/03 AAA 5,168,359.50 1.34 10,OD0,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG .000 6.192 AAA 104.977 10,496,875.00 3.70 01HO62649 6.500% 04/15/2033 DD 04/01/03 AAA 10,497,656.00 2.72 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN # TR 00459 .000 1.628 A2 100.140 899,406.00 .31 073928VC4 VAR RT 12/01/2003 DD 08/17/01 A 901,260.00 .23 1,500,000.00 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT .000 5.380 A2 102.234 1,527,135.00 .54 125581ADO 5.500% 11/30/2007 DD 12/02/02 A 1,533,510.00 .40 5,000,000.00 CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB NT .000 5.246 AA2 107.234 5,333,600.00 1.89 172967BPS 5.625% 08/27/2012 DD 08/26/02 A+ 5,361,700.00 1.39 196,350.30 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 .000 5.789 100.886 200,461.40 .06 25475MAD6 5.840% 10/17/2011 DD 03/19/99 198,089.96 .05 163,148.25 FHLMC GROUP #G4-0353 .000 7.201 AAA 104.154 167,277.94 .05 3128DBMA2 7.500% 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 AAA 169,925.17 .04 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL ROHE LN BK CONS BDS .000 6.462 AAA 110.263 7,997,625.00 2.91 3133MAUN7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 8,269,727.25 2.14 101,743.55 FHLMC GROUP #78-6064 .000 3.737 AAA 102.836 99,263.56 .03 31348SWZ3 6.384% 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97 AAA 104,629.51 .03 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS .000 4.815 AAA 109.035 11,521,271.50 4.36 31359HJX2 5.250% 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AAA 12,375,502.01 3.20 2,593,603.29 GNMA POOL #0569358 .000 6.188 AAA 105.049 2,654,390.87 .96 362000QK3 6.500% 04/15/2032 DD 04/01/02 AAA 2,724,565.21 .71 1 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 7 OCSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE t 04/08/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 09.36.44 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 413,445.05 GNMA II POOL 00080395 .000 4.410 AAA 102.045 409,690.21 .14 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 421,901.66 .11 3,767,207.21 GNHA II POOL 1080408X .000 4.410 AAA 102.045 3,728,946.51 1.35 36225CN28 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 3,844,231.53 1.00 3,000,000.00 GTE NORTH INC DEB SER A .000 5.789 Al 103.640 3,063,750.00 1.09 362337AD9 6.000% 01/15/2004 DD 01/15/94 A+ 3,109,200.00 .81 5,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN 1TR 00575 .000 5.205 AAA 104.703 5,203,500.00 1.84 36962GZY3 5.450% 01/15/2013 DD 12/06/02 A-2 5,235,150.00 1.36 4,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN /00615 .000 1.684 A2 99.765 3,998,440.00 1.40 37042WE80 VAR RT 08/04/2003 DD 08/03/01 BBB 3,990,600.00 1.03 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR NT .000 5.973 A2 102.546 3,064,350.00 1.08 370425SD3 6.125% 08/28/2007 DD 00/29/02 BBB 3,076,380.00 .80 3,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC SR NT .000 4.019 AA3 102.671 3,030,030.00 1.08 38141GCS1 4.125% 01/15/2008 DD 01/13/03 A+ 3,080,130.00 .80 1,500,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT .000 5.858 A2 100.828 1,625,940.00 .57 441812JW5 6.375% 10/15/2011 DD 10/23/01 A 1,632,420.00 .42 3,000,000.00 JP MORGAN CHASE 6 CO SUB NT .000 5.488 A2 104.765 3,127,260.00 1.10 4662511AT7 5.750% 01/02/2013 DD 11/25/02 A 3,142,950.00 .81 3,200,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY NT .000 3.640 AA3 99.593 3,195,648.00 1.12 617446HW2 3.625% 04/01/2008 DD 03/06/03 A+ 3,186,976.00 .83 3,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL UTILS COOP FIN .000 6.237 A2 116.234 3,465,480.00 1.23 637432CU7 7.250% 03/01/2012 DD 03/07/02 A 3,487,020.00 .90 5,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS .000 7.277 BAA1 103.062 5,263,000.00 1.81 718154CHO 7.500% 04/01/2004 DD 04/01/97 A- 5,153,100.00 1.33 140,156.92 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.387 AAA 100.672 144,054.92 .04 74046RFW6 6.430% 03/08/2004 DD 06/21/99 141,098.53 .04 3,679,356.91 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 .000 5.759 AAA 110.080 3,679,356.91 1.43 03162CLJO 6.340% 03/01/2021 AAA 4,050,236.09 1.05 2,637,657.40 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .000 5.998 AAA 110.700 2,637,657.40 1.03 831641DD4 6.640% 02/10/2011 DD 02/21/01 NR 2,919,886.74 .76 I YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 8 OCSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE : 04/08/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ---- ------ ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1 C .000 32.529 B3 21.000 1,600,000.00 .11 909317BC2 6.831% 03/01/2010 DD 08/22/01 A- 336,000.00 .09 20,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.467 AAA 114.313 22,620,312.50 8.07 9128272JO 06.250% 02/15/2007 DD 02/15/97 AAA 22,862,500.00 5.92 .00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00 9128274YS 3.875% 01/15/2009 DD 01/15/99 AAA .00 .00 57,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.221 AAA 110.125 62,782,901.47 22.20 9128276N7 05.750% 11/15/2005 DD 11/15/00 AAA 62,881,375.00 16.28 3,000,000.00 VERIZON GLOBAL FDG CORP GLOBAL .000 6.243 A2 118.125 3,530,490.00 1.25 92344GAT3 7.3758 09/01/2012 DD 08/26/02 A+ 3,543,750.00 .92 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PWR 01 SER A .000 5.290 A3 108.531 3,487,680.00 1.34 927804ENO 5.750% 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01 BBB+ 3,798,585.00 .98 16,053,520.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.817 3.067 AAA 110.031 14,119,622.69 6.23 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 AAA 17,663,888.73 4.57 3,950,000.00 GMAC NTS 5.752 1.445 A2 99.671 3,918,760.50 1.39 370425QVS VAR RT 08/18/2003 DD 08/17/98 BBB 3,937,004.50 1.02 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 5.081 1.450 Al 100.031 1,992,800.00 .70 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05/11/98 A 2,000,620.00 .52 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 5.967 6.467 AAA 110.181 16,154,410.00 6.02 31359HFB1 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/14/00 AAA 17,077,980.60 4.42 1,421,839.94 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A 6.316 4.302 AAA 99.319 1,423,354.78 .49 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97 AAA 1,412,157.21 .37 1,067,181.72 GNHA GTD REHIC TR 2000-9 FB 6.320 1.770 AAA 100.583 1,067,181.72 .37 3837B4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,073,403.39 .28 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.738 A2 100.171 2,031,960.00 .70 073902AHI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 2,003,420.00 .52 14,511.60 GHHA POOL #0500917 6.389 5.731 AAA 104.699 13,774.69 .00 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 15,193.53 .00 52,552.05 GNHA POOL #0506636 6.389 5.731 AAA 104.699 49,083.39 .01 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 55,021.59 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 OCSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE 04/08/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ------------------ ------ ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 546,725.37 GNMA POOL 10503388 6.389 5.731 AAA 104.699 518,961.97 .20 36210VFSS 6.000% 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99 AAA 572,417.20 .15 22,487.79 GNHA POOL #0499153 6.389 5.731 AAA 104.699 21,345.82 .00 3621000E5 6.000% 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 23,544.54 .01 666,417.96 GNMA POOL #0496461 6.390 5.731 AAA 104.699 632,576.40 .24 36210MQN4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 697,734.41 .18 178,611.98 GNMA POOL 10491103 6.390 5.731 AAA 104.699 169,541.85 .06 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 187,005.35 .05 16,922.07 GNMA POOL #0486720 6.390 5.731 AAA 104.699 16,062.75 .00 36210AVM6 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AAA 17,717.28 .00 32,362.96 GNMA POOL #0497343 6.390 5.731 AAA 104.699 30,719.54 .01 362IONP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AAA 33,883.77 .01 27,704.88 GNMA POOL 10469688 6.391 5.731 AAA 104.699 26,298.00 .01 36209EXRS 6.000% 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/98 AAA 29,006.79 .01 33,319.31 GNMA POOL #0467279 6.391 5.731 AAA 104.699 31,627.32 .01 36209CCQ7 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/99 AAA 34,885.06 .01 60,958.95 GNMA POOL #0457814 6.391 5.727 AAA 104.762 57,863.37 .02 36208QSB3 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 63,861.64 .02 622,401.19 GNMA POOL #0467286 6.391 5.731 AAA 104.699 590,794.88 .23 36209CCX2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 651,649.19 .17 742,239.17 GNMA POOL #0465555 6.392 5.727 AAA 104.762 704,547.35 .27 36209AE48 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 777,582.52 .20 25,820.45 GNMA POOL #0483452 6.392 5.727 AAA 104.762 24,509.25 .00 36209WBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 27,049.95 .01 723,417.09 GNMA POOL #0465546 6.392 5.727 AAA 104.762 686,681.07 .26 36209AET3 6.000% 08/15/2028 DD 08/01/98 AAA 757,864.19 .20 629,734.39 GNMA POOL #0468339 6.392 5.727 AAA 104.762 597,755.71 .23 36209DHQO 6.000% 08/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 AAA 659,720.58 .17 36,396.45 GNMA POOL #0438057 6.393 5.727 AAA 104.762 34,548.20 .01 36207PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 38,129.55 .01 7 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 10 OCSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE s 04/08/03 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME s 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- - -- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 32,209.75 GNMA POOL #0468330 6.393 5.727 AAA 104.762 30,574.09 .01 36209DHF4 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AAA 33,743.49 .01 1,364,294.89 FNLMC MULTICLASS CTF Tll A6 6.496 6.356 AAA 102.272 1,364,900.63 .49 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AAA 1,395,291.66 .36 2,884,581.83 FBLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 6.499 5.632 AAA 106.526 2,728,441.89 1.08 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 3,072,829.64 .80 1,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 6.625 1.599 AA1 100.015 10000,000.00 .35 79548EEES VAR RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/20/00 AA- 1,000,150.00 .26 516,528.07 GNMA II POOL #080088H 6.705 5.211 AAA 203.147 527,827.12 .18 36225CC20 7.375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 AAA 532,781.14 .14 2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.717 6.252 A2 105.968 1,992,280.00 .74 57174BABB 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/99 AA- 2,119,360.00 .55 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.573 A3 101.937 2,995,080.00 1.07 345397SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 BOB 3,058,110.00 .79 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LNS INC NT 6.866 6.466 A3 105.937 2,498,400.00 .93 22237UABS 6.850% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2,648,425.00 .69 350,846.91 GNMA II POOL #0080023 6.992 5.423 AAA 103.719 356,657.82 .12 36225CA29 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 363,894.20 .09 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 7.113 5.640 AAA 117.466 2,030,133.00 .87 31359HEYS 6.625% 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 AAA 2,466,788.31 .64 794,873.85 GREYSTONE SVCG CORP FHA #95-7 7.564 6.931 AAA 107.194 783,261.24 .30 39810#AE4 7.430% 06/01/2023 DD 02/29/00 AAA 852,059.54 .22 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 7.582 6.750 A3 100.000 965,170.00 .35 345397GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93 BBB 1,000,000.00 .26 952,656.49 WHP/HUNTOON PAIGE #000-11150 7.684 6.967 AAA 107.643 931,965.99 .36 302998GE3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 1,025,466.22 .27 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN #TR 00115 7.709 6.794 A3 107.609 2,950,530.00 1.13 69512BEUS 7.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,228,270.00 .04 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 11 OCSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE s 04/08/03 DISTRICTS LONG—TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S—P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- --------- --------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 7.967 7.049 Al 111.718 1,594,032.00 .63 020002AL5 7.975% 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 A+ 1,787,488.00 .46 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES .801 5.287 274,979,970.06 100.00 283,228,763.73 73.38 -- -- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL .760 5.017 377,929,341.19 100.00 386,205,722.14 100.00 5 Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund March 31, 2003 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance March 1,2003 $8,984,844 $8,984,844 $8,984,844 1.904 1.904 Deposits: 3/19/2003 13,000,000 13,000,000 13,000,000 1.904 1.904 Withdrawals: 3/5/2003 (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) 1.904 1.904 3/12/2003 (6,500,000) (6,500,000) (6,500,000) 1.904 1.904 Total Withdrawis (8,500,000) (8,500,000) (8,500,000) 1.904 1.904 Balance March 31,2003 $13,484,844 $13,484,844 $13,484,844 1.904 1.904 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 05/14/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-34 14(f) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: Amended Deferred Compensation Plan GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No, OCSD 03-10, approving Amended Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees of the District. SUMMARY The District's Deferred Compensation Plan was amended in 1998 to comply with the Small Business Job Protection Act. At that time, the District added two providers for employees to choose from, bringing the total to three. Those providers are Lincoln National. VALIC and International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Retirement Corporation. The 1998 Plan included a loan program although it has not yet been implemented. The Human Resources Department has been working with the three carriers and anticipates offering the loan provision in the near future. A loan program would be advantageous to employees who do not qualify for a hardship withdrawal but need to secure financial assistance. The First Amendment to the 1998 District Deferred Compensation Plan was adopted in 2002 in order to incorporate the changes from the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. The most notable changes involved the amounts employees were allowed to contribute to the Plan. The Internal Revenue Service has recently issued final regulations that will again require changes to the Districts' Plan, and the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002 included some technical corrections that must also be made. The District must now again amend the Deferred Compensation Plan in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457, due to substantial changes in the regulations. The significant changes include guidance concerning certain changes, clarification of issues arising from the old regulations and resolution of certain long-standing issues that have not been addressed. The major changes included in the Amended Plan can be summarized as: • Addressing the treatment of excess deferrals • Including Plan termination as a distributable event • Including examples that limit the "unforeseeable emergency" withdrawal • Providing non-taxable loans if IRS code requirements are satisfied • Clarifying that plan-to-plan transfers are allowed and their impacts • Permitting deferral of accumulated leave pay or back pay under some conditions • Defining includable compensation for determining annual contribution limits. The attached memo from General Counsel provides more information on each of these changes. G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\Item 14(f).Deferred Comp.doc PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Costs are limited to minor staff administrative costs such as providing documents and referring employees to the appropriate Third-Party Plan Administrator. There are no District contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted: will be included in budget for FY2003/2004. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 2. General Counsel memorandum 3. Exhibit A— Deferred Compensation Plan Amendment Page 2 a a RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 03-10 APPROVING AN AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT APPROVING THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (20031 FOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has, pursuant to Resolution No. OCSD 98-36, adopted July 1, 1998, adopted a Deferred Compensation Plan, known as the Orange County Sanitation District Deferred Compensation Plan [1998], for eligible Employee Participants (hereinafter referred to as the"Plan"); and WHEREAS, the United States Congress enacted the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 ("2001 Act"), in part amending Internal Revenue Code Section 457 relating to Deferred Compensation Plans; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature has enacted Senate Bill 657 (Chapter 34, 2002 STATS.), amending the California Revenue &Taxation Code to conform to the similar provisions in the Internal Revenue Code Section 457; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has, pursuant to Resolution No. OCSD 02-12, adopted July 17, 2002, adopted the First Amendment to the Orange County Sanitation District Deferred Compensation Plan; and WHEREAS, subsequent to adoption of the First Amendment to the Orange County Sanitation District Deferred Compensation Plan, the U.S. Secretary of Treasury, acting through the Internal Revenue Service adopted final regulations implementing amendments to the Internal Revenue Code Section 457; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan in order to comply with and provide the benefits of the "2001 Act', and to comply with the final regulations of the Internal Revenue Service. NOW,THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: That the Orange County Sanitation District Amended Deferred Compensation Plan (2003), as set forth in Exhibit"A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though set forth herein at length, is hereby adopted, as the restated and consolidated Deferred Compensation Plan of the District, superseding all previous plans and amendments of the District, and shall remain in effect until amended or terminated by Resolution of the Board of Directors. WS&S-#147203:05/29102 1 C R Section 2: Resolution No. OCSD 02-12 and the adopted First Amendment to the Orange County Sanitation District Deferred Compensation Plan are hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 28, 2003. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary WS&S-#147203:05/29/02 2 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: FAHR Committee Members Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: April 30, 2003 RE: District's Amended Deferred Compensation Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Plan: Changes Due to the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 ("2001 Act") was enacted by Congress and has had a substantial impact on the administration of Internal Revenue Code Section 457 ("Section 457") Deferred Compensation Plans. The State Legislature subsequently passed companion legislation (Chapter 34, 2002 STATS.), to provide that all the changes to Internal Revenue Code Section 457 are also allowed for State tax purposes. The most significant changes involve the amounts that may be contributed to a Section 457 Plan. Due to the 2001 Act, we reviewed and revised the Orange County Sanitation District's ("District") Section 457 Plan, and presented necessary changes that were approved by the Board of Directors Resolution No. OCSD 02-12 on July 12, 2002. However, at that time, the IRS had only issued proposed regulations. It has now issued final regulations and several changes to the District's Plan are now required. We have rewritten the entire Plan and will repeal all others to avoid confusion. The Board Resolution should be placed on the next possible Agenda for adoption. SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO THE PLAN As noted, the First Amendment to the 1998 Plan, which was adopted by the Board in July 2002, addressed most of the significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code and a few changes suggested by the proposed regulations of IRS. I provide the following summary of the additional changes required of our Plan, as a result of the final regulations promulgated by the IRS in late 2002. A. Section 4.7 This section now allows for an employee who could have participated in the Plan, but was called to active military service, for a period of a year or more, to defer the annual amount to which he/she would be otherwise eligible as an employee notwithstanding his absence for military duty. B. Section 4.8 This section is somewhat of a "senior citizen" provision and benefit, in that it allows participants who are eligible to make elective deferrals if they have attained age 50 before the close of the year, and to take advantage of additional contributions in an amount equal to and known as the "catch Orange County Sanitation District April 30, 2003 Page 2 up provision." This allows for deferring sums that could have been, but were not deferred in prior years. C. Section 6.1 This section now provides for a specific detailed description of the authority of the Plan Administrator, who is the Human Resources Director, or such other person as specifically designated by the Board of Directors. Under the prior plans there was a broader and more general delegation of authority, and certainly the nature of the duties would be legally implied. However, with the new regulations, we now have detailed itemization of all of the powers and duties. D. Section 6.4 This section is a grant of an authority to be exercised, at the discretion of the District, to deduct miscellaneous fees incurred for the administration of the Plan, from either the trust fund in its entirety or from individual accounts, if legal, audit, insurance or trustee fees are required for the individual participant. History has indicated that these have never been a significant expense to the District, and while such deductions impliedly could have been made, it is preferable to have a specific provision in the Plan authorizing the deductions if they are, in fact, deserved. E. Section 8.3 This section declares that participants are able to direct the selection of his or her investments, by making the request known to the Plan Administrator. This section also provides that in such an event, the liability relating to non- performance or depreciation of the investment rests solely with the individual employee participant and no liability is placed upon either the District or the District's Administrator. F. Section 8.4 This section authorizes the employee participants to invest in the purchase of life insurance, and as with other investments, any risk attendant to such investment is placed solely on the employee participant. This is not a change in the law or in the substantive provisions of prior plans, but again is designed to specify in detail who has the risk. G. Section 10.8 This section is a significant change, and is a reflection of the final regulation so as to allow participants, or a beneficiary who is entitled to receive an eligible rollover distribution, to direct that it be paid to an eligible retirement plan, for example OCERS, in lieu of paying the amount to the participant or the beneficiary. Any employee may determine in his or her own way that the money, on deposit with the Deferred Compensation Plan, would be better served by rolling it over as a voluntary contribution to OCERS. However, this is all contingent upon OCERS having approved such programs. Orange County Sanitation District April 30, 2003 Page 3 H. Section 12.5 This section is a significant change in that it sets forth that the District, as the employer, may authorize the Administrator to make loans from the trust fund to the participants. There are a number of specific required conditions to comply with, and the maximum amount of the loan shall not exceed $50,000 or the highest outstanding balance in the employee's account. The loans must have a specific maturity date, and bear a reasonable rate of interest, and shall not exceed five years except for loans to acquire a dwelling unit to be used as the principle residence of the participant. I. Section 15 This new section has been added to include within the Plan itself, a restatement of the applicable law on the subject, namely that the District, its Directors and its employees are immune from liability from any action taken, with respect to the Plan or trust, or the Administration thereof, except for gross negligence and willful misconduct. MISCELLANEOUS By separate memo, dated May 29, 2002, 1 provided, to the District, a summary of the major provisions relating to Deferred Compensation Plans, as set forth in the amendments to the Internal Revenue Code. Those included an outline of the change in the maximum amount of the contributions, the authorization for "catch up" relating to those employees who had failed to maximize the amount authorized for deferment in the given year, and the provision for qualified domestic relations order to clarify the respective rights of parties to a dissolution of marriage. That memo is readily available upon request by any member of the Board. Respectfully submitted, THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:jIo cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN [20031 ADOPTED MAY 28, 2003 SECTION 1: Background. The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, pursuant to Resolution No. OCSD 98-36, adopted July 1, 1998, has adopted a Deferred Compensation Plan, known as the Orange County Sanitation District Deferred Compensation Plan [1998], for eligible Employee Participants (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"). U.S. Congress enacted The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 ("2001 Act"), which provided numerous changes to the Internal Revenue Code relating to Deferred Compensation Plans for public agency employees. SECTION 2: Purpose. The primary purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain personnel by permitting them to enter into Plan Participation Agreements which will provide future payments in lieu of current income upon death, disability, retirement, or other termination of employment with the Employer. Neither the Plan, nor any provision of the Plan, shall be construed as either an employment agreement, or a right to be retained by the Employer. The Employer intends that the Plan satisfy the Internal Revenue Code Section 457 requirements for an "eligible deferred compensation plan." However, the Employer does not guarantee any tax benefits due to participation in the Plan, and each Participant should consult his or her own tax representative for information and advice on the tax ramifications of participation in the Plan. SECTION 3: Definitions. For the purposes of this Plan, certain words or phrases used herein will have the following meanings: 3.1 "Applicable Dollar Amount" shall mean the maximum amount of elective deferrals that a Participant in the Employer's Section 457 Plan may defer for the taxable year, as set forth in Section 4.2 (a) and (b). 3.2 "Category A Beneficiary" shall mean any individual designated as the beneficiary by the Participant, either pursuant to the Participation Agreement or pursuant to a later written election filed with the Employer before the death of the Participant. A trust may also be designated as a beneficiary under the Plan. The individual trust beneficiaries (as opposed to the trust itself), who may receive trust distributions on account of payments from the Plan shall be deemed to be the Category A Beneficiaries under the Plan, provided that as of the later of the date that the Participant submits to the Employer the election in which the Trust is named as a beneficiary or the Required Beginning Date, and as of all subsequent periods during which the trust is named as a beneficiary of the Plan, all of the following conditions are met: (1)the trust is a valid trust under State law; (2)the trust is irrevocable; (3)the beneficiaries of the trust can be identified from the trust instrument;and(4)a 1 t V copy of the trust instrument has been provided to the Employer. No other legal entity, such as a charitable foundation or the estate of the Participant, may be a Category A Beneficiary for the purposes of the Plan. As used herein, "Beneficiary' shall refer to either a Category A or Category B Beneficiary. [2003 Plan] 3.3 "Category B Beneficiary" shall mean a beneficiary who is designated by the Participant in either the Participation Agreement or a later written election filed with the Employer before the Participant's death, and who is not a "Category A Beneficiary" within the meaning of Section 3.2 above. (Examples: a trust not meeting the requirements of Section 3.2, a charitable foundation, or the estate of the Participant.) As used herein, `Beneficiary" shall refer to either a Category B or Category A Beneficiary. [2003 Plan] 3.4 "Deferred Compensation" shall mean the amount of compensation not yet earned, which the Participant and the Employer mutually agree shall be deferred in accordance with the provisions of this Plan. 3.5 "Deferred Compensation Investment Fund" shall mean the fund to which all Deferred Compensation is credited, as described in Section 6.2. 3.6 "Early Retirement" shall mean a termination of service with the Employer which becomes effective on the first day of the calendar month after the Participant, not yet having attained Normal Retirement Age, meets the minimum age and/or service requirements,for voluntary retirement, specified in the Retirement Plan. 3.7 "Employee" shall mean any employee who is a director or officer, a permanent, full-time or part-time employee, or an independent contractor acting in the capacity of a consultant to the District for a continuous and indefinite duration and was a Participant in the Plan on or before January 1, 2002. [2003 Plan] 3.8 "Employer" shall mean the Orange County Sanitation District, acting as Trustee for purposes of the Plan. (2003 Plan] 3.9 "Includible Compensation"(a term defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 457(e)(5) and Treasury Regulation Section 1.457-2(e)(2)) shall mean compensation for services performed for the Employer which is currently includible in gross income. Accordingly, a Participant's includible compensation for a taxable year does not include any amount payable by the Employer that is excludable from the Participant's gross income under Internal Revenue Code section 457(a) and Treasury Regulation Section 1.457-1 (including but not limited to this Plan), Internal Revenue Code 2 } Section 403(b), or other applicable federal income tax laws. The amount of Includible Compensation shall be determined without regard to any community property laws. 3.10 "Investment Account" shall mean a book account for the individual Participant, as more fully described in Section 6.3. 3.11 "Late Retirement" shall mean a termination of service with the Employer which becomes effective after the date on which the Participant has both exceeded the Normal Retirement Age and met the service requirements. 3.12 "Maximum Annual Deferral" shall mean the overall maximum annual dollar amount (except for roll-over amounts) that a Participant in the Employer's Section 457 Plan may defer pursuant to Sections 4.2 and 4.3 of the Plan. 3.13 "Normal Retirement" shall mean a termination of service with the Employer which becomes effective on the first day of the calendar month after the Participant attains Normal Retirement Age and meets any service requirements necessary for voluntary retirement, specified in the Retirement Plan. 3.14 "Normal Retirement Age" shall mean the age specified in the Retirement Plan contract between the Employer and the Board of Administration of the Orange County Employees' Retirement System; provided, however, that a Participant who continues to work for the Employer after attaining Normal Retirement Age may elect, for the purposes of Section 4.3 below, an alternate Normal Retirement Age, which may be an age greater than age 70'/2, but which shall be a date or age not later than either(a)any mandatory retirement age specified by the Employer, or(b)the date or age at which the Participant actually separates from service with the Employer. The Participant shall make any such election by delivering to the Employer, prior to separation from service with the Employer, written notice specifying the chosen alternate Normal Retirement Age. Nothing in this Section 3.14 shall be construed to mean that the Employer has imposed a mandatory retirement age or that the Participant has agreed to retire at a designated age. 3.15 "Participant" shall mean an Employee who has elected to participate in the Plan. 3.16 "Participation Agreement" shall mean the agreement which is executed by the Employee and filed with the Employer in accordance with Section 4,and pursuant to which the Employee elects to become a Participant in the Plan and defers a portion of his income. 3 V 3.17 "Plan" shall mean the Orange County Sanitation District Amended Deferred Compensation Plan, as established hereunder. 3.18 "Plan Administrator" or "Administrator" shall mean the District's Director of Human Resources, or such other person designated and appointed by adopted Resolution or Minute Order action of the Board of Directors, as defined in Section 6.1 of the Plan. [2003 Plan] 3.19 "Plan Year" shall mean the calendar year. 3.20 "Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO")" is a judgment, decree, or order (such as an order approving of a property settlement agreement) that (1) relates to the provision of child support, spousal support, or marital property rights to a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent of a Participant; and (2) creates or recognizes the existence of an alternate payee's right to receive all or a portion of the Participant's Investment Account. [2003 Plan] 3.21 "Required Beginning Date" shall mean the latest date that distributions are permitted to commence under Section 10.3. 3.22 "Retirement Plan" shall mean the retirement plan of the Orange County Employees' Retirement System,which is governed by the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (California Government Code Section 31450 et seg.) and is made available to the employees of the Employer pursuant to contract. 3.23 "Salary" shall mean the full, regular, basic salary which would be paid by the Employer to or for the benefit of the Employee (if he were not a Participant in the Plan) for actual services for the period that he is a Participant. 3.24 "Termination of Service" shall mean the severance, prior to retirement and other than by death, of the Participant's employment with the Employer. For an independent contractor, termination of service shall mean the expiration of the contract (or contracts) under which services are performed for the Employer, provided that the expiration constitutes a good-faith and complete termination of the contractual relationship as defined in Code Section 457 and the Regulations thereunder. [2003 Plan] 3.25 "Unforeseeable Emergency" shall mean a severe financial hardship to the Participant resulting from a sudden and unexpected illness or accident of the Participant or of a dependent (as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 152(a) of the Participant, loss of the Participant's property due to casualty, or 4 other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Participant. The circumstances that will constitute an Unforeseeable Emergency will depend upon the facts of each case. Examples of what are not considered to be Unforeseeable Emergencies include the need to send a Participant's child to college or the desire to purchase a home. SECTION 4: Participation in the Plan. 4.1 Any Employee designated by the Employer to be eligible may elect to become a Participant in the Plan by executing and filing a Participation Agreement with the Employer. An election to participate in the Plan and to defer compensation under the Plan shall become effective with respect to compensation earned by the Participant during the period commencing with the beginning date of the first pay period in the month following the month in which the Employer consents to and approves of the Participation Agreement. Such Participation Agreement and election to defer compensation shall continue thereafter in full force and effect unless and until terminated by the Participant as provided in Section 4.4,Section 10.4 or Section 11. 4.2 Each Participation Agreement shall specify the amount of compensation, either by dollar amount or by percentage of Salary, which is to be deferred pursuant to the Plan and to be withheld out of the Salary otherwise payable to the Participant for each pay period. The amount deferred each year may not exceed the lesser of: (a) The "applicable dollar amount' determined in accordance with the following table: Taxable Year Applicable Dollar Amount 2002 $11,000 2003 $12,000 2004 $13,000 2005 $14,000 2006 or thereafter $15,000 [2003 Plan] 1 1 Cost-of-Living adjustments:In the case of taxable years beginning after December 31,2006,the Secretary[of the Treasury]shall adjust the$15,000 amount(A)at the same time and in the same manner as under Internal Revenue Code Section 415(d),except that the base period shall be the calendar quarter beginning July 1,2005,and any increase under this section which is not a multiple of$500 shall be rounded to the next lowest multiple of$500. 12001 Amendment] 5 (b) One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Participant's Includible Compensation, or (c) Be less than Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) each year. This Three Hundred Dollar ($300.00) limitation shall not be applied to any Participant who is paid less than $1,200.00 per year for services rendered to the Employer. 4.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4.2 herein, during any or all of the last three (3) taxable years ending before a Participant attains Normal Retirement Age (or the alternate Normal Retirement Age chosen pursuant to Section 3.14 above, the maximum amount which may be deferred annually shall be the lesser of: (a) Twice the dollar amount in effect in Subsection 4.2(a) for the taxable year; [2003 Plan] or (b) The sum of: (i) The maximum deferral amount established for the purposes of Section 4.2 for the taxable year (determined without regard to this Section 4.3), plus (ii) The maximum deferral amount established in Section 4.2 for any prior taxable year or years, less the amount of compensation deferred under the Plan, for such prior taxable year or years, pursuant to either Section 4.2 or this Section 4.3. A prior taxable year shall be taken into account under subdivision (ii) only if: (a) it begins after December 31, 1978; (b) the Participant was eligible to participate in the Plan during all or any portion of the taxable year; and (c) compensation deferred (if any) under the Plan during the taxable year was subject to the maximum deferral amount under Section 4.2 herein. A Participant will be considered to have been eligible to participate in the Plan for a taxable year if the Participant was an Employee for any part of that taxable year. A prior taxable year includes a taxable year in which the Participant was eligible to participate in an Internal Revenue Code section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan sponsored by an entity other than the Employer, provided that such other entity is located in the State of California. 6 4.4 A Participant may terminate his election to defer compensation under the Plan by executing and filing with the Employer a written notice at least thirty (30)days prior to the effective date of termination. In the event a Participant ceases to qualify under Section 3 hereof as a Participant, his election to defer compensation shall automatically terminate on the same date as he becomes ineligible. A Participant(including a former Participant who is again eligible to participate) may not resume the deferral of compensation during the calendar month in which termination occurred; however, he may elect to resume the deferral of compensation in subsequent calendar months after a lapse of not less than three (3) months. No amounts shall be payable to an Employee upon the termination of deferral of compensation, unless otherwise provided for in either Section 10 or Section 11. 4.5 A Participant may change the amount of compensation to be deferred in a subsequent calendar month by executing and filing notice with the Employer at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of such month; provided, however, that such change may be made not more than four (4) times in a calendar year. 4.6 In applying the provisions of this Section 4, amounts deferred shall be taken into account at present value in the Plan Year in which deferred. 4.7 For any taxable year that a Participant has a period of qualified military service as described in Section 414(u)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Participant may, over the period described in Section 414(u)(2)(A)(i) of the Code defer the amount that he or she could have deferred during any such period of qualified military service, had the Participant performed services for the Employer and received includable compensation from the Employer during such period as described in Section 414(u)(7) of the Code based on the rate of compensation the Participant would have received from the Employer, but for the period of military service, to the extent required by and in accordance with the Uniformed Services Employment and Re- employment Rights Act of 1994. [2003 Plan] 4.8 Notwithstanding the provision of Section 4.2 herein, all Participants who are eligible to make elective deferrals under this Plan and who have attained age 50 before the close of the year shall be eligible to make catch-up contributions in accordance with, and subject to the limitations of, Section 414(v) of the Code. Such catch-up contributions shall not be taken into account for purposes of the provisions of the Plan implementing the required limitations of Sections 402(g) and 415 of the Code. These catch up contributions shall only be available in years in which the catch-up contribution, pursuant to this Section, exceeds the amount permitted to be contributed pursuant to Section 4.3. [2003 Plan] 7 4.9 To the extent required by Treasury Regulations, in the event that a Participant defers more than the maximum amount permitted under Sections 4.2, 4.3, and 4.8 of this Plan, such excess amounts ("Excess Deferrals") will be distributed to the Participant, with allocable net income, as soon as administratively practicable after the Plan determines that the amount is an Excess Deferral. [2003 Plan] SECTION 5: Deferral of Compensation. During the period of participation, the Employer shall not pay the Participant his full Salary, but shall defer payment of such part of his Salary as is specified by the Participant in the Participation Agreement, which has been executed and filed with the Employer. SECTION 6: Administration of the Plan. 6.1 The Employer shall, by Resolution of its Board of Directors, appoint a person or persons to act as the Administrator of the Plan (the "Administrator"). The Administrator shall have full authority and power to adopt the rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan, and to interpret, amend, alter, and revoke any rules and regulations so adopted. The actions of the Employer and of the Administrator, with respect to the Plan, and the administration of the Plan, shall be presumed to be fair, reasonable, and impartial, and the Employer and the Administrator shall be deemed to have exercised reasonable care, diligence, and prudence, unless the contrary is proven by affirmative evidence. The Administrator, pursuant to a delegation from the Employer, shall have authority to control and manage the operation and administration of the Plan. The Administrator shall have all powers necessary to exercise its authority and discharge its responsibilities, including, but not by way of limitation, the following: (a) To construe and interpret the Plan and determine all questions relating to the eligibility of employees to participate; (b) To maintain all necessary records for the administration of the Plan other than those maintained by third parties; (c) To compute and certify the amount and kind of benefits payable to Participants and Beneficiaries; (d) To authorize and direct all disbursements and distributions from the Trust; (e) To make and publish such rules for the regulation of the-Plan as not inconsistent with the terms hereof; 8 (f) To employ one or more persons to render advice with regard to any responsibility any fiduciary has under the Plan; (g) To prescribe administrative policies and procedures; (h) To receive from the Employer and the Employee such information and prescribe the use of such forms as shall be necessary for the proper administration of the Plan; (i) To prepare and distribute, in such manner as the Administrator determines to be appropriate, information explaining the Plan; (j) To furnish the Employer, upon request, such annual reports with respect to the administration of the Plan as are reasonable and appropriate; (k) To receive and review reports of the financial condition and of the receipts and disbursements of the Trust; (1) To delegate any duty or power; (m) To appoint or employ for the Plan any agents it deems advisable, including but not limited to, brokers, investment advisors, accountants,or legal and actuarial counsel,to assist the Administrator in discharging its duties hereunder; (n) To administer a Participant Loan Program as provided in Section 12.5 of the Plan; (o) To exercise any power delegated to it by the Trustee pursuant to Section 8.2 of the Plan; and (p) To appoint or employ an independent certified public accountant to prepare reports of the Plan, as required by law, and for general audit purposes. [2003 Plan] 6.2 The Employer shall establish a Deferred Compensation Investment Fund to which all Deferred Compensation shall be credited at such times as the amounts deferred would have been payable to the individual Employee if he were not a Participant in the Plan. 9 z 6.3 The Employer shall maintain a book account (the "Investment Account") for each Participant, to which shall be credited the Deferred Compensation of the individual Participant. The Participant's Investment Account shall be credited with the earnings thereof, if any, and shall be credited or debited, as the case may be, with the net amount of any gains or losses which may result from the investment of all or any portion of the amount in the Participant's Investment Account. The Employer, its directors, officers and employees, shall not be liable for any losses on any investment credited to any Investment Account. On a quarterly basis,the Employer shall credit the earnings and/or gains and debit the losses on each Investment Account. Such credits and debits shall be made, and the final quarterly balance of the Investment Account shall be posted, as of the last day of each quarter. 6.4 All administrative expenses with respect to the Plan, including but not limited to, legal and consulting fees, audit fees, insurance and trustees fees, if any, may, in the discretion of the Employer, be charged to and deducted from the Trust Fund. Notwithstanding the lack of a provision specifically providing for the charging of an expense incurred by the Plan or Trust with respect to a Participant, all expenses incurred by the Plan or Trust with respect to a Participant may be recovered from such Participant or such Participant's Account in accordance with the procedures established by the Administrator. [2003 Plan] SECTION 7: Return of Contributions. If an Employer contribution is made by virtue of a mistake of fact, Paragraph 9 shall not prohibit the return of such contribution to the Employer within one (1) year after the payment of the contribution. [2003 Plan] SECTION 8: Declaration of Trust. 8.1 Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6, all Deferred Compensation credited to the Deferred Compensation Investment Fund, all property and rights purchased with amounts credited to the Deferred Compensation Investment Fund, and all income attributable to such amounts, property, or rights (collectively, the "Trust Estate") shall be held, by the Employer as trustee, in trust for the exclusive benefit of the Participants and their beneficiaries, per the terms and conditions of Section 8.2 below. Except as provided in Section 7, no portion of the Trust Estate shall revert to the Employer or be used or diverted to purposes other than the exclusive benefit of the Participants and their beneficiaries. 8.2 The Employer shall be the Trustee. As Trustee, and in accordance with applicable law, the Employer, (or if the Employer delegates these functions to the Administrator, the Administrator) [2003 Plan]: 10 f (a) shall have the power to invest and reinvest the Trust Estate in all assets permitted under Government Code Section 53609; (b) shall have the power to retain in cash, without obligation for interest, such portion of the Trust Estate as it may deem (i) advisable to meet Plan obligations, or (ii) to be in the best interests of the Plan; (c) shall have the power to retain, manage, operate, administer and otherwise deal with the Trust Estate in such manner as it deems appropriate; (d) shall have the power to transfer, sell, exchange, redeem and dispose of the assets of the Trust Estate, in any manner and at any time, by private or public sale or otherwise; (e) shall have the power,with respect to the assets of the Trust Estate,to exercise all the rights of an individual owner, including, but not limited to, the power to give proxies, to participate in any voting trusts, mergers, consolidations or liquidations, and to exercise or sell stock subscriptions or conversion rights; (f) shall have the power to hold, authorize the holding of, and register any assets of the Trust Estate in any manner permitted by law; (g) shall have the power, in its discretion, to compromise, contest (whether through legal proceedings or otherwise), arbitrate, or abandon claims and demands on behalf of the Trust Estate and/or the Plan, and to commence, maintain or defend the Trust Estate and/or the Plan in suits or legal proceedings; (h) shall have the power to employ brokers, consultants, accountants, depositories, agents and legal counsel on behalf of the Trust Estate and/or the Plan; (i) shall have the power to open, maintain and close any bank account(s), in any federally insured financial institution permitted by law, in the name of the Plan,the Employer or, to the extent permitted by law, any nominee or agent of the Plan or the Employer; (j) shall have the power to charge to, and pay from, the Trust Estate: (i) any taxes levied or assessed upon or in respect to the assets of the Trust Estate, (ii) any commissions and similar expenses with respect 11 to the assets of the Trust Estate, (iii)the reasonable compensation of any third-party manager or administrator utilized by the Employer in the management or administration of the Trust Estate and/or the Plan, and (iv) the reasonable expenses of such third-party manager or administrator or the Employer incurred in connection with Trust Estate and/or Plan management or administration (including, but not limited to, legal, accounting, investment and custodial services); (k) shall pay benefits to Plan Participants and their beneficiaries, in cash or in kind or partly in each, in accordance with the terms hereof; (1) shall have the power: (i)to retain any funds or property subject to any dispute, without liability to pay interest, (ii)to decline to make payment or delivery of the funds or property until final adjudication of the dispute is made by a court of competent jurisdiction, and (iii)to charge an Investment Account with the Employee's legal expenses and costs incurred due to a dispute concerning that Investment Account; (m) shall have the power to make Participant loans, as described in Section 12.5; (n) shall administer the Plan and the Trust Estate as described in Section 6 and this Section 8; (o) shall have the discretion: (i) to make limited investment options available to the Participant and to change those investment options from time to time, (ii)to eliminate an investment option, even if all or a portion of a Participant's Investment Account is already invested therein, with the result that such amount must be reinvested in another, permitted, investment), and (iii) to invest the amounts in a Participant's Investment Account either as requested by the Participant, or as otherwise determined by the Employer; (p) shall not be required to invest the amounts in the Trust Estate; however, it is the Employer's intent to invest and reinvest such amounts in a manner intended to increase the same, and the net interest, accumulation and increments thereon shall be credited to, and held in, the Trust Estate for the exclusive benefit of the Participants and their beneficiaries; the Employer shall not be responsible for any loss due to the investment or failure of investment of such assets; nor shall the Employer be required to replace any loss whatsoever which may result from said investments; and 12 (q) shall have the power to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all instruments necessary or proper for the accomplishment of, and to do any and all other acts that it may deem necessary or appropriate to carry out, the foregoing powers. 8.3 If the Administrator permits Participants and Beneficiaries to direct the selection of investments with respect to his/her own accounts pursuant to Section 8.2(o),then the Participant or Beneficiary shall be solely responsible for the results of the investment of their account and the Administrator and the Trustee shall be relieved of liability for such investments. No action of the Employer or Administrator shall be considered an endorsement or guarantee of any investment or fund, and neither the Employer nor the Administrator shall be treated as having guaranteed the Participant's accounts or investments, or any part thereof,against loss or depreciation nor promise any results. Neither the Employer nor its Directors or agents or employees, shall be liable to any Participant or Beneficiary for any results or losses from any investments election directed by such Participant or Beneficiary, and all Participants and Beneficiaries shall hold the Employer, its Directors, agents, and employees harmless from any costs, liabilities, or losses arising from such investment choices. [2003 Plan] 8.4 The Employer may permit Participants and Beneficiaries to elect to invest all or a portion of their accounts in one or more life insurance contracts, provided that such Participant or Beneficiary shall be solely responsible for such decision. Further, as a condition to permitting such investment, the Administrator may require that any Participant or Beneficiary who chooses to invest in life insurance must separately agree in writing to hold the Employer, its Directors, agents, and employees, harmless from any costs, liabilities, or losses arising from investment in life insurance contracts. [2003 Plan] SECTION 9: Plan Benefits. Deferred Compensation benefits are payable on the happening of any of the following events: (a) Early Retirement of a Participant; (b) Normal Retirement of a Participant; (c) Late Retirement of a Participant; (d) Termination of Service of a Participant; or 13 (e) Death of a Participant who dies either before or after Deferred Compensation payments commence,and before the entire amount of his Investment Account is paid. SECTION 10: Distribution of Benefits. 10.1 Termination of Employment by Retirement. The Participant is eligible to receive distributions of benefits, with respect to retirement, after the Participant has met the requirements for Normal Retirement and has retired from service with the Employer. The Participant may submit to the Employer an application for distribution of benefits under the Plan as early as the date he notifies the Employer of his intended retirement and as late as thirty(30) days following the actual date of termination of employment due to retirement. Pursuant to such application, the Participant shall elect one of the benefits described below, expressed in terms of both payment option and commencement date option. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, effective as of January 1, 2002, Participants who have made payment elections, may revoke existing payment elections and make new elections or elect to defer all remaining benefits, provided that any such new election or deferral must meet the requirements of Section 10.7.4 and Section 401(a)(9) of the Code and the regulations thereunder. There shall be no limit on the number of times that a Participant may revoke or modify an existing election to receive installment payments. [2003 Plan] 10.1.1 Options. Following the Participant's termination of employment due to retirement and the receipt of such application,the Employer shall pay to the Participant one of the following benefits (expressed in terms of both payment option and commencement date option) as elected by the Participant: A. PAYMENT OPTION - (1) Options: (a) Consecutive regular payments paid no less frequently than annually(i.e., monthly, quarterly, or annually)_over a period certain, as determined by the Participant; provided, however, that any such period certain may not extend beyond the life expectancy of the Participant or the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and the Participant's Category A Beneficiary. 14 (b) Consecutive regular payments paid no less frequently than annually (i.e., monthly, quarterly, or annually) for the life of the Participant or for the lives of the Participant and his Category A Beneficiary. (c) Annuity payments pursuant to an annuity that is offered by a Plan provider providing services to the Employer and that is structured so as to comply with all applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the Treasury Regulations and all other applicable laws. (d) A single payment equal to the balance of the Participant's Investment Account. (e) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be determined by the Participant, with the remainder of the Participant's Investment Account to be paid under payment option (a), payment option (b), or payment option (c) above. (2) Modified or Delayed Election: In years prior to January 1, 2002, the Participant may modify his payment option election at any time until the date which is thirty (30) days before the commencement date as finally determined pursuant to Subsection 10.1.1, 10.1.2, or 10.1.3, as applicable (the "Final Commencement Date"). Or, the Participant may choose to defer making a payment option election altogether, until a date as late as thirty (30) days before the Final Commencement Date. In years prior to January 1, 2002, thirty (30) days before the Final Commencement Date, the most recent payment option election on file with the Employer shall become irrevocable. If there is no payment option election on file with the Employer at that time, the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account to the Participant in consecutive regular monthly payments beginning on the Final Commencement Date and continuing for the life of the Participant. [2003 Plan] B. COMMENCEMENT DATE OPTION - (a) The date which is thirty (30) days following termination of employment due to retirement, or 15 (b) A later date which is the first day of a calendar month. In the case of payment option (e) above, the lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first payment over time is paid. In the case of payment option (e) above, the lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first payment over time is paid. C. LIMITATIONS - The foregoing options are limited by, and these payments shall be made subject to, the provisions of Sections 10.3, 10.5, 10.6 and 10.7 hereof. The total amount of any benefits paid pursuant to payment options (a) through (e) above shall not exceed the sum of the amounts deferred by the Participant, as adjusted for any earnings or losses thereon. 10.1.2 Default Election. Should the Participant fail to elect one of the benefits hereunder by way of an application for retirement benefits filed with the Employer no later than fifteen (15) days after retirement, the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account according to the "Benefit A" election previously made pursuant to either the Participation Agreement or a modification thereof. However, if there is no such previous election,then the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account to the Participant in consecutive, regular monthly payments, beginning on the Required Beginning Date and continuing for the life of the Participant. 10.1.3 One-Time Change in Commencement Date Election. For distributions made on or after January 1, 1997, and prior to January 1, 2002, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 10.1, the Participant may, at any time more than thirty (30) days after termination of employment due to retirement, and at least thirty (30) days before the scheduled commencement date, pursuant to either Subsection 10.1.1 or the Benefit "A" election on file with the Employer as of the date of retirement, elect to further defer the commencement date, to a date later than that previously elected (but not later than the Required Beginning Date). The Participant may exercise his or her right, underthis Subsection 10.1.3, to file a changed commencement date election only once. 16 10.2 Termination of Employment Prior to Retirement. Following the Termination of Service of a Participant, the Employer shall pay to the Participant the benefit elected by the Participant pursuant to either (a) "Benefit B" of the Participation Agreement submitted by the Participant at the time of election to participate in the Plan or (b) a later written election delivered to the Employer no later than thirty (30) days following Termination of Service. Except as otherwise provided in Subsection 10.2.3 below, the commencement date portion of the latest such election filed with the Employer shall become irrevocable upon the lapse of the thirtieth (30th) day following Termination of Service. 10.2.1 Options. A. PAYMENT OPTION - (1) Options: (a) Consecutive regular payments paid no less frequently than annually(i.e., monthly, quarterly, or annually) over a period certain, as determined by the Participant; provided, however, that any such period may not extend beyond the life expectancy of the Participant or the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and the Participant's Category A Beneficiary. (b) Consecutive regular payments paid no less frequently than annually (i.e., monthly, quarterly, or annually)_for the life of the Participant or for the lives of the Participant and his Category A Beneficiary. (c) Annuity payments pursuant to an annuity that is offered by a Plan provider providing services to the Employer and that is structured so as to comply with all applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the Treasury Regulations and all other applicable laws. (d) A single payment equal to the balance of the Participant's Investment Account. (e) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be determined by the Participant, with the remainder of the Participant's Investment Account to be paid under payment option (a), payment option (b), or payment option (c) above. 17 (2) Modified or Delayed Election: The Participant may modify his payment option election at any time until the date which is thirty (30) days before the commencement date as finally determined pursuant to Subsection 10.2.1, 10.2.2, or 10.2.3, as applicable (the "Final Commencement Date"). Or, the Participant may choose to defer making a payment option election altogether, until a date as late as thirty (30) days before the Final Commencement Date. Thirty(30) days before the Final Commencement Date, the most recent payment option election on file with the Employer shall become irrevocable. If there is no payment option election on file with the Employer at that time, the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account to the Participant in consecutive, regular monthly payments, beginning on the Final Commencement Date and continuing for the life of the Participant. Effective for Terminations of Service occurring on or after January 1, 2003, should the Participant fail to make an election hereunder no later than thirty(30)days after Termination of Service,then the Participant shall be deemed to have elected to defer commencement of distributions until the earlier of (a) the date that the Participant elects to receive distributions; or (b) the date that distributions are otherwise required by the provisions of this Plan under Section 401(a)(9) of the Code and the regulations thereunder, in which case, payment shall be made as required in Section 10.7.4. [2003 Plan] B. COMMENCEMENT DATE OPTION - (a) The date which is forty-five (45) days following Termination of Service; or (b) A later date which is the first day of a calendar month. In the case of payment option (e) above, the lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first payment over time is paid. C. LIMITATIONS - The foregoing options are limited by, and these payments shall be made subject to, the provisions of Sections 10.3, 10.5, 10.6 and 10.7 hereof. 18 The total amount of any benefits paid pursuant to payment options (a) through (e) above shall not exceed the sum of the amounts deferred by the Participant, as adjusted for any earnings or losses thereon. 10.2.2 Default Election. Should the Participant fail to elect one of the benefits hereunder either pursuant to the "Benefit B" provisions of the Participation Agreement or pursuant to a subsequent written election delivered to the Employer no later than thirty (30) days after Termination of Service, then the Employer shall pay the total amount in the Participant's Investment Account to the Participant in consecutive, regular monthly payments, beginning on the date which is forty-five (45) days following Termination of Service and continuing over the life of the Participant. Effective for Terminations of Service occurring on or after January 1, 2003, should the Participant fail to elect one of the benefits hereunder either pursuant to the Benefit"B"provisions of the Participation Agreement or pursuant to a subsequent written election delivered to the Employer no later than thirty (30) days after Termination of Service, then the Participant shall be deemed to have elected to defer commencement of distributions until the earlier of (a) the date that the Participant elects to receive distributions; or(b)the date that distributions are otherwise required by the provisions of this Plan under Section 401(a)(9) of the Code and the regulations thereunder in which case payments shall be made as required in Section 10.7.4. [2003 Plan] 10.2.3 One-Time Change in Commencement Date Election. Effective for Termination of Service on or after January 1, 1997 and prior to January 1, 2002 [2003 Plan]and notwithstanding_anything to the contrary in this Section 10.2, the Participant may, at any time more than forty-five (45) days following Termination of Service occurs, and at least thirty (30) days before the scheduled commencement date, pursuant to either Subsection 10.2.1 or the Benefit "B" election on file with the Employer as of the date of Termination of Service, elect to further defer the commencement date, to a date later than that previously elected (but not later than the Required Beginning Date). The Participant may exercise his or her right, under this Subsection 10.2.3,to file a changed commencement date election only once. 10.3 Required Distributions. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan: (a) Payments under Sections 10.1 and 10.2 shall begin no later than the later of: (i) April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in 19 which the Employee attains age 70-1/2; or (ii) April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Employee retires; (b) With respect to distributions under the Plan made on or after January 1, 2001, the Plan will apply the requirements of Section 401(a)(9) of the Code in accordance with the proposed regulations under Section 401(a)(9) that were issued in 2002 and with respect to distributions under the Plan made on or after January 1, 2002, the Plan will apply the requirements of Section 401(a)(9) of the Code in accordance with the final regulations under Section 401(a)(9)that were issued in 2002, and as may be subsequently amended. [2003 Plan] 10.4 Acceleration of Payment of Small Investment Accounts. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 10.1 and 10.2 above, a Participant may elect to receive the full balance of his or her Investment Account at anytime, but only on the following conditions: (a) the balance of the Investment Account does not exceed the maximum amount permitted under Internal Revenue Code section 457(e)(9) (or a successor provision) at the time of the withdrawal; (b) no amount has been deferred under the Plan with respect to the Participant during the two-year period ending on the date of the distribution; and (c) there has been no prior distribution to the Participant under this Section 10.4 (i.e., the acceleration right can be exercised only once). Any distribution under this Section 10.4 shall be deemed a termination of participation in the Plan. The (former) Participant may re-elect to participate in the Plan, pursuant to Section 4.1, after a lapse of at least three (3) months after the date of distribution under this Section 10.4. 10.5 Lifetime Distribution Requirements. The distributions under this Plan must be made primarily for the benefit of the Participant and the schedule elected by the Participant for payment of benefits under Sections 10.1 and 10.2 of the Plan must be such that benefits payable to a beneficiary are not more than incidental, according to the applicable Treasury Regulations. Payments under those sections shall be distributed over the life of the Participant or over the lives of the Participant and a Category A Beneficiary (or over a period not extending beyond the life expectancy of the Participant or the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and a Category A Beneficiary), in accordance with the Treasury Regulations under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(9). 20 In addition, as required by Internal Revenue Code section 401(a)(9)(G), and except as otherwise provided in Section 10.7 below, all distributions shall be made in accordance with the incidental death benefit requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 401(a). As more fully described in the applicable Treasury Regulations, as promulgated pursuant to the authority of Internal Revenue Code section 401(a)(9), this means that distributions must be made in accordance with a certain formula designed to ensure that the entire Investment Account of the Participant is distributed over a period of time not to exceed the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and a Category A Beneficiary who is not more than ten years younger than the Participant. 10.6 Death of Participant. In the event of the death of the Participant, either before or after termination of employment (by retirement or otherwise), and before the entire amount of his Investment Account has been distributed,the Employer shall distribute the amount then remaining in the Participant's Investment Account pursuant to Subsections 10.6.1 through 10.6.3 below. 10.6.1 When Participant Dies on or after the Required Beginning Date and after Distributions Have Begun. If distributions have already begun during a Participant's lifetime, and the Participant dies on or after the Required Beginning Date and before the entire amount of his Investment Account has been distributed, then the remaining portion of the Participant's Investment Account shall be distributed,as elected by the Participant, pursuant to either the "Benefit C" provisions of the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the Employer before the death of the Participant, unless the Participant's election would permit distributions to be made less rapidly after death than under the method of distribution being used as of the date of death. In order to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(9), distributions (under this Subsection 10.6.1) after death must be made at least as rapidly as under the method of distribution being used as of the date of death. 10.6.2 When Participant Dies either before the Required Beginning Date or before Distributions Have Begun. If a Participant dies either before the Required Beginning Date or before distribution of his Investment Account has begun, and, if any portion of the Investment Account is payable to (or for the benefit of) a Category A or B Beneficiary, then the Employer shall pay such portion as follows: 21 A. CATEGORY A BENEFICIARIES - (1) Category A Beneficiary Other than Surviving Spouse: If the Category A Beneficiary is other than the surviving spouse, the portion of the Investment Account payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed according to one of the following options, expressed in terms of both payment option and commencement date option: PAYMENT OPTION: (a) consecutive regular payments paid no less frequently than annually(i.e., monthly, quarterly, or annually) over a period not to exceed the shorter of fifteen (15) years or the life expectancy of the Category A Beneficiary; (b) annuity payments pursuant to an annuity that is offered by a Plan provider providing services to the Employer and that is structured so as to comply with all applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the Treasury Regulations and all other applicable laws; (c) a single lump-sum payment; or (d) a single lump-sum payment, in an amount to be determined by the Participant, with the remainder of the Participant's Investment Account to be paid under either payment option (a) or payment option (b) above. COMMENCEMENT DATE OPTION: Such distributions shall begin on the date designated by either the Participant or, if permitted by the Participant, the Category A Beneficiary, but in no event later than December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant dies. If the Category A Beneficiary submits a permitted benefits election, the election must be filed with the Employer within forty-five (45) days after the 22 Participant's death, and the earliest commencement date shall be the date which is sixty (60) days following the date of death of the Participant. If payment is made under payment option (d) above, the lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first payment overtime is paid. (2) Surviving Spouse: If the Category A Beneficiary is the surviving spouse of the Participant, the portion of the Investment Account payable to the surviving spouse shall be distributed according to one of the following options, expressed in terms of both payment option and commencement date option: PAYMENT OPTION: (a) consecutive regular payments paid no less frequently than annually(i.e., monthly, quarterly, or annually)_over a period not to extend beyond the life expectancy of the surviving spouse; (b) annuity payments pursuant to an annuity that is offered by a Plan provider providing services to the Employer and that is structured so as to comply with all applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the Treasury Regulations and all other applicable laws; (c) a single lump-sum payment; or (d) a single lump-sum payment, in an amount to be determined by the Participant, with the remainder of the Participant's Investment Account to be paid under either payment option (a) or payment option (b) above. COMMENCEMENT DATE OPTION: Such distributions shall begin on the date designated by either the Participant or, if permitted by the Participant, the surviving spouse, but in no event later than the later of (i) December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant dies, 23 and (ii) December 31 of the calendar year in which the Participant would have attained age 701/2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if as of the date of the Participant's death, both the surviving spouse and another are Category A Beneficiaries, then distributions shall begin on or before December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant dies. If the surviving spouse submits a permitted benefits election, the election must be filed with the Employer within forty-five (45) days after the Participant's death, and the earliest commencement date shall be the date which is sixty (60)days following the date of death of the Participant. If payment is made under payment option (d) above, the lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first payment over time is paid. 3) Elections: PARTICIPANT'S ELECTION: All elections (as to both payment option and commencement date) to be made under this Subsection 10.6.2 shall be made by the Participant pursuant to either the "Benefit C" provisions of the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the Employer before the death of the Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Participant, in the Participation Agreement or such later written election, may specify that, following the death of the Participant, the Category A Beneficiary may elect, subject to the foregoing limitations, the form of payments and the commencement date of distributions. BENEFICIARY'S ELECTION: Any permitted beneficiary election must be in the form of a written election filed with the Employer no laterthan forty-five (45) days following the date of death of the Participant. In the absence of any such timely election, the portion of the Investment Account payable to such Category A Beneficiary shall be distributed to him or her 24 in consecutive, regular monthly payments beginning on the date which is sixty (60) days following the date of death of the Participant occurs and continuing (i) for fifteen (15) years, if the Category A Beneficiary is other than the surviving spouse; or (ii) for the life of the surviving spouse, if the Category A Beneficiary is the surviving spouse. The commencement date portion of the Beneficiary's election shall become irrevocable on the date forty-five (45) days after the Participant's death. However, the Beneficiary may modify his payment option election up to thirty(30)days before the previously elected commencement date. (4) Death of a Category A Beneficiary: If a Category A Beneficiary dies within six months of the date of the Participant's death and before the entire portion of the Investment Account allocated to him has been paid pursuant to this Subsection 10.6.2, then the remainder of such portion shall be paid to the contingent beneficiary, if any, designated by the Participant in either the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the Employer before the Participant's death. If there is no such contingent beneficiary, or if the Category A Beneficiary dies more than six months after the date of the Participant's death and before the entire portion of the Investment Account allocated to him has been paid pursuant to this Subsection 10.6.2, then the remainder of such portion shall be paid to the estate of the deceased Category A Beneficiary. Any payment under this paragraph shall be made in a lump sum on the earliest practicable date following the date of death of the Category A Beneficiary. (5) Trust Beneficiary as Category A Beneficiary: In the case of a trust meeting the requirements of Section 3.2, any individual beneficiary of the Trust who is eligible to receive Trust distributions on account of payments from the Plan,shall be deemed to be a Category A Beneficiary under the Plan. (For example, if the Participant designates as his Beneficiary a Trust which meets the requirements of Section 3.2, and of which his surviving spouse is the Life Beneficiary, and elects lifetime payments, then for the purpose of this Subsection 10.6.2, the surviving spouse shall be deemed to be the Category A Beneficiary, and the terms of this Subsection shall 25 be applied by basing distributions on the life expectancy of the surviving spouse.) B. CATEGORY B BENEFICIARIES - If the Beneficiary is a Category B Beneficiary, which is a validly existing legal entity (such as a Trust not meeting the requirements of Section 3.2, a_charitable foundation, or the estate of the Participant), the portion of the Investment Account payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed as a lump sum on the earliest practicable date following the death of the Participant. In no event, however, shall that payment date be more than five (5) years following the date of death of the Participant. 10.6.3 Default Provision. If, upon the death of the Participant, there exists neither a Category A Beneficiary nor a Category B Beneficiary to receive any portion of the Participant's Investment Account, then the Employer shall, on the earliest possible date following the death of the Participant, pay that portion in a lump sum to the estate of the Participant. 10.7 General Distribution Requirements and Provisions. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Plan to the contrary, all distributions under this Plan shall be made shall be made in accordance with the provisions of this Section 10.7 and, to the extent of any inconsistency, the provisions of this Section 10.7 shall control. 10.7.1 Calculation of Life Expectancy. For the purpose of ascertaining the relevant distribution periods and amounts hereunder, life expectancy, where applicable, shall n4at be recalculated annually. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, with respect to permitted annuity distributions, life expectancy may be calculated in any manner permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, the Treasury Regulations, and all other applicable tax laws. 10.7.2 Additional Distribution Requirements. For years prior to January 1, 2002 [2003 Plan] any payments payable over a period of more than one year shall only be made in substantially non-increasing amounts, paid not less frequently than annually. 10.7.3 Employer Payout of Small Accounts. The Employer, in its sole and absolute discretion, shall have the right, at any time when subparagraphs (a)-(c) of Section 10.4 are satisfied, to distribute 26 the entire balance of the Participant's Investment Account to the Participant. In addition, after distributions have begun under Sections 10.1, 10.2 or 10.6, if the balance of the Participant's Investment Account, or any portion thereof payable to a beneficiary, should be less than or equal to the amount provided in Internal Revenue Code Section 457(e)(9) (or a successor provision),the Employer, in its sole and absolute discretion and for administrative ease, may distribute such balance or such portion in a lump sum on the date of the first regularly scheduled payment of the next calendar year. 10.7.4 Statutory Compliance. All distributions under this Plan shall be made in accordance with the Treasury Regulations under Internal Revenue Code section 401(a)(9), including both the minimum distribution requirements of Treasury Regulation Section 1.401(a)(9)-1, and, (in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(9)(G)) the minimum distribution incidental benefit requirements of Treasury Regulation Section 1.401(a)(9)-2. To the extent that any distribution option hereunder is inconsistent with Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(9), the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(9) shall control and the Plan shall be administered so as to conform with Section 401(a)(9). Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 457(d)(2)(B)(i)(I), Treasury Regulations (the "Superseding Regulations") should be issued which require more rapid distributions than those required by Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(9)(G) and the Treasury Regulations under Section 401(a)(9)(G), then the distributions under this Plan shall be made pursuant to such Superseding Regulations,to the extent inconsistent with Section 401(a)(9) and the Treasury Regulations under that Section. 10.7.5 Cost-of-Living Adjustment of Periodic Payments. The Participant or a Category A Beneficiary,at the time of submitting a distribution option election permitted under Section 10.1, Section 10.2, or Section 10.6 of the Plan, may elect that any distributions made pursuant to a periodic payment option may be made not in fixed amounts, but rather in increasing amounts, based on increases in the cost-of-living. The formula for determining cost-of-living increases shall be established by the Employer from time to time. 10.8 Direct Rollovers. A Participant or Beneficiary who is entitled to receive an Eligible Rollover Distribution may direct the Employer to pay all or a portion of such distribution directly to an Eligible Retirement Plan, in lieu of paying 27 such amount to the Participant or Beneficiary. A. The Employer shall establish reasonable rules and procedures with respect to elections to make direct rollover distributions to an Eligible Retirement Plan. B. The Employer shall treat the election by a Participant or Beneficiary to make or not make a direct rollover with respect to one (1) payment in a series of periodic payments as applicable to all subsequent payments in the series unless the Participant or Beneficiary subsequently changes the election. C. For purposes of this Paragraph, the following definitions shall apply: (1) "Eligible Rollover Distribution" shall mean any distribution of all or any portion of the balance to the credit of the Participant or Beneficiary, except that an Eligible Rollover Distribution does not include: any distribution that is one of a series of substantially equal periodic payments (not less frequently than annually) made for the life (or life expectancy) of the Participant or Beneficiary, or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of the Participant or Beneficiary and such Participant's or Beneficiary's designated beneficiary, or for a specified period of ten (10) years or more; any distribution to the extent such distribution is required under Section 401(a)(9) of the Code; any distribution on account of an unforeseeable emergency; and the portion of any distribution that is not includable in gross income (determined without regard to the exclusion for net unrealized appreciation with respect to employer securities). (2) "Eligible Retirement Plan" shall mean an individual retirement account described in Section 408(a) of the Code, an individual retirement annuity described in Section 408(b)of the Code,an annuity plan described in Section 403(a) of the Code, or a qualified trust described in Section 401(a) of the Code, an annuity contract as described in Section 403(b)of the Code,or another eligible plan under Section 457(b)of the Code which is maintained by a state, political subdivision of a state, or any agency or instrumentality of a state or political subdivision of a state that accepts the Participant's or Beneficiary's Eligible Rollover Distribution and which agrees to separately account for amounts transferred into such plan from this Plan. However, in the case of an Eligible Rollover Distribution to the 28 surviving spouse, an Eligible Retirement Plan is an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity. (3) "Beneficiary"shall include a Participant's former spouse who is the alternate payee under a Qualified Domestic Relations Order, as defined in Section 414(p) of the Code, with respect to the interest of the former spouse. [2003 Plan] SECTION 11: Emergency Withdrawals. In the event of an Unforeseeable Emergency,to be determined by the Employer in its sole discretion,the Employer may pay to the Participant all or any portion of the amount in such Participant's Investment Account, as of the month end following the date when such determination is made. Payment may not be made to the extent that the hardship resulting from the Unforeseeable Emergency is or may be relieved (a)through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise, (b) by liquidation of the Participant's assets, to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not itself cause severe financial hardship, or(c) by cessation of deferrals under the Plan. The amount that may be paid out is limited to the amount reasonably necessary to alleviate the Unforeseeable Emergency need and, in most cases, will be paid only in a single lump sum. In the event of an Unforeseeable Emergency which causes the initial lump sum payment to be inadequate to meet the Unforeseeable Emergency need, the Participant (or former Participant) may apply for the payment of subsequent lump-sum amounts, up to the entire amount in the Participant's (or former Participant's) Investment Account. Any distribution under this section shall be deemed a termination of the election to defer compensation under Section 4.4 above, and no further deferral of compensation shall be made unless the Participant subsequently re-elects to defer compensation under the Plan, as provided in Section 4.4. Moreover, any distribution of 100% of the Participant's Investment Account under this section shall be deemed a revocation of the Participant's agreement to participate in the Plan. The (former) Participant may re-elect to participate in the Plan, pursuant to Section 4.1, after a lapse of not less than three (3) months. SECTION 12: Assignments and Transfers. 12.1. Consistent with Section 8 above, no one, including the Participant, his beneficiary or designee, or any other person, shall have any right to commute, sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise convey the right to receive any payments hereunder, which payments and right thereto are expressly declared to be non-assignable and non-transferable. The Employer shall have no liability to either the Participant or a purported assignee or transferee, on account of any attempted assignment or transfer. In addition, except to the extent otherwise provided by law, no interest of the Participant in the Plan shall be subject to attachment, garnishment or execution, or be 29 transferable by operation of law, whether due to bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation for the benefit of creditors, or any other cause. 12.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the amounts deferred by a former Participant may be transferred to another Internal Revenue Code section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan of which the former Participant has become a participant, if the following conditions are met: (1) the plan to which the former Participant wishes to transfer amounts deferred is located within the State of California; (2) the plan receiving such amounts provides for the acceptance of such amounts; (3) the employer accepting the transfer funds gives written notice of its agreement to accept such transfer and assumes liability therefor; and (4) the Participant provides a written release to the Employer releasing the Employer from any claim or liability under the Plan after the date such transfer of funds occurs. If a Participant separates from service in order to accept employment with another entity which permits the Participant to participate in a section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan, and if the four conditions enumerated above are met, payout of benefits will not commence upon separation from service, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, and amounts previously deferred will automatically be transferred to that other entity's section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan, to be credited to the Participant's account. 12.3 A Participant, who was formerly employed by another public agency located within the State of California, may transfer, to the Plan, funds from an Internal Revenue Code section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan maintained by that former employer, if that eligible deferred compensation plan permits transfers to other section 457 eligible deferred compensation plans and if the Participant complies with all applicable terms and conditions of both the transferring plan and this Plan in effectuating the transfer. As a condition to transfer to this Plan, the Employer may require that assets transferred from another plan be in the form of cash or cash equivalents. Effective for distributions made on or after January 1, 2002, a Participant who receives an "Eligible Rollover Distribution", as defined in Sections 401(a)(31), 408(d)(3),403(b)(8), and 457(e)(16)of the Code from an eligible plan as defined in Section 401(c)(8)(B of the Code may transfer or rollover 30 t such distribution to this Plan. All such rollover contributions shall be separately accounted for. [2003 Plan] 12.4 Notwithstanding any other provision of these Distribution rules to the contrary, if a Qualified Domestic Relations Order ("QDRO") provides that a Participant's benefit is to be divided and a portion allocated to an alternate payee under the terms of a QDRO (such as a spouse or former spouse), Such distribution shall not violate this Section. Where a spouse(or a former spouse) of a Participant in the Employer's Section 457 Plan receives a distribution under the terms of a QDRO, the spouse (or former spouse) will be treated as the distributee and taxed on the benefits received. Distributions under the Employer's Section 457 Plan made to an alternate payee other than a spouse (or former spouse) under a QDRO are taxable to the Participant." [2003 Plan] 12.5 Upon application duly made in form and content satisfactory to the Employer, the Employer authorizes the Plan Administrator to make loans on behalf of the Employer, as Trustee,from the Trust Fund to Participants on such terms and conditions as the Employer may prescribe from time to time, including but not limited to, the following: 12.5.1. Amount of Loan. The aggregate principal balance of all Participant loans of all qualified plans maintained by the Employer(including any affiliated employers)shall not exceed the lesser of (a) Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) reduced by the excess, if any, of (i) the highest outstanding loan balance from the Plan during the one (1)year period ending on the day before the date such loan is made, over (ii) the outstanding balance of loans from the Plan on the date such loan is made; or (b) one-half (1/2) of the sum of the Participant's Account balance. 12.5.2. Loan Provisions. All Participant loans shall have a specific maturity date and bear a reasonable rate of interest in an amount to be determined by the Employer comparable to the rate then being charged for similar loans, but in no event exceeding the maximum rate then permitted by law. All Participant loans shall be secured by the Participant's beneficial interest in the Plan and such other security as the Employer shall determine. All Participant loans shall require that substantially equal payments of principal and interest be made at least quarterly. 12.5.3. Loan Term. All loans shall be required to be repaid within five (5) years; except that any loan used to acquire any dwelling unit which within a reasonable time is to be used as the principal residence of 31 i 4 the Participant, may be made for a term of up to thirty (30) years. 12.5.4. Default. Should the Participant fail to repay the loan within the time prescribed by the note evidencing the loan, or default on any of the loan terms, the Employer may, at its option, (i) enforce the rights of the Plan against any or all real or personal property securing the loan; or (ii) take such other remedies as may be available under the law. 12.5.5. Employer Decisions. The Employer's determination as to whether or not any loan application shall be granted shall be final and conclusive on all parties, and there shall be no appeal or dispute. 12.5.6 Earmarked Investments. The Employer shall treat any loan made pursuant to the provisions of this Article as an earmarked investment and shall allocate all gains and losses to the account of the borrowing Participant. 12.5.7 Written Procedures. This loan program shall be administered in accordance with the rules set forth in this Section 12, and such other written procedures as may be established by the Employer and the Administrator. Such written procedures shall include, but need not be limited to the following: (a) The identity of the person or position authorized to administer the Participant loan program; (b) The procedures for applying for Plan loans; (c) The basis on which loans will be approved or denied; (d) The limitation, if any, on the types and amounts of loans offered; (e) The procedure for determining a reasonable rate of interest to be charged for Plan loans; (f) The types of collateral which may secure a Participant's loan; and (g) The events constituting default and the steps that will be taken to preserve Plan assets in the event of such default. [2003 Plan] 32 r 12.6 If a Participant so elects, the Plan may make a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer of all or a portion of the Participant's Account to a defined benefit governmental plan (as defined in Section 414(d) of the Code for the purchase of permissive service credit (as defined in Section 415(n)(3)(A) under such Plan, or a repayment to which Section 415 does not apply by reason of Subsection (k)(3) thereof. [2003 Plan] SECTION 13: Notice. Any notice or other communication required or permitted under the Plan shall be in writing, and, if directed to the Employer (ATTN: Director of Human Resources), shall be sent to the Employer at its principal office,and, if directed to a Participant or a beneficiary, shall be sent to such Participant or beneficiary at his last- known address as it appears on the Employer's records. Such notice shall be deemed given when mailed, unless notice is given in person, in which case such notice shall be deemed given upon receipt. SECTION 14: Amendment or Termination of Plan. The Employer may, at any time, terminate this Plan for all Participants. Upon such termination,the Participants in the Plan shall be deemed to have withdrawn from the Plan as of the date of such termination; each Participant's full Salary on a non-deferred basis will be thereupon restored; and the Employer agrees to pay each Participant the amount of money determined as if the Participant had terminated his employment, said payment to be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 10.2. The Employer may also amend the provisions of this Plan at any time; provided, however,that no amendment shall affect the rights of the Participants or their beneficiaries to the receipt of payment of benefits, to the extent of any compensation already deferred at the time of the amendment, as adjusted for investment experience prior to and subsequent to the amendment. SECTION 15: Liability of Employer. Neither the Employer, its Directors, nor its Employees, shall be liable for any action taken or not taken with respect to the Plan and Trust, except for its or their own gross negligence or willful misconduct. Neither the Employer, its Directors, nor its Employees, shall be liable upon any contract, agreement, or other instrument made or executed by it or them in its or their behalf in the administration of the Plan and Trust. Neither the Employer, its Directors, nor its Employees, shall be liable for the neglect, omission, or wrongdoing of any other person in connection with the administration of the Plan and Trust, nor shall any such person be required to make inquiry into the propriety of any other person in conjunction with the administration of the Plan and Trust. [2003 Plan] 33 Y 1 a The Employer hereby establishes, on the terms and conditions set forth above, the Orange County Sanitation District Amended Deferred Compensation Plan (2003). This Amended Plan shall constitute an amendment and restatement and consolidation of all Deferred Compensation Plans previously established, maintained, or acquired by the District, and shall supercede all such Deferred Compensation Plans which have been previously established, maintained, or acquired by the District. All such Plans shall be deemed to have been merged into this Plan, so that this Plan shall be the only Deferred Compensation Plan pursuant to Section 457 of the Code which is offered by the District, although the District, in its sole discretion, may continue with or enter into various contracts or agreements with various investment providers pursuant to this Plan. [2003 Plan] W S&S:05/20/03:167255 34 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 05/14/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-35 14(g) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: Intern Pay Structure GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase of $1.00 per hour to the Intern pay range grade 0 (S10.00 - $17.00), in support of the new Student Intern Program, to be effective May 28, 2003. SUMMARY In April 1990 the Board of Directors approved a request for an Engineering and Scientific Intern Program to be used in the Engineering, Technical Services and Operations and Maintenance Departments. Two goals of the program were to acquaint potentially employable interns with the District and also to provide the District with an opportunity to evaluate prospects for future full-time positions. The program has been successful over the past 13 years in providing hands-on work experience to college students and also by transitioning a number of these students into full-time District employees. Based on the needs of the District, the Human Resources Department has reviewed the current program and proposed expanding the program into the Student Intern Program. A summary report was presented to and approved by the Executive Management Team and is provided as Attachment 1 . In 1990 staff contacted other wastewater agencies and consulting firms to assess what level of pay would be compatible for Engineering Interns. Based on that survey a sliding scale was established based on years of schooling. The current pay scale has been in effect since 1990. Staff surveyed comparison agencies and local cities to determine if the current pay scale is competitive in the market. Based on the research it is recommended that all the current hourly rates for interns be increased by $1 .00 (Attachment 1 , page 4). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The annualized cost of increasing the hourly rate based on the eight currently employed interns would be $8.320 for FY02/03. The proposed 2003-04 budget will include authorization for a total of 18 Interns at 20 hours per week. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Wages and Salary) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ALTERNATIVES 1. Current hourly rates remain in effect. 2. Hourly rates are increased by S.50 per hour. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1 . OCSD Intern Program EMT Summary Report G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Repons\2003 Board Agenda Reporls\0503\Item 14(g),Intem Pay.doc Revised: 8/20101 Page 2 v Attachment 1 Oatr SAN1T� 40� W 0 A �ti 9o,FcrNp� pV OCSD Intern Program EMT Summary Report Overview Internship programs offer employers the opportunity not only to do something for their communities, but also to help develop the skilled workforce they will need in the future. In addition, it is an excellent environment for students to develop workplace readiness skills, gain work experience, and learn about career opportunities. The District is currently developing a Student Intern Program that will be separate from the current staffing plan. In addition, HR is proposing that Interns be removed from the staffing budget and they should not be considered as a .5 FI'E in the staffing plan;they should be budgeted to a separate line item for the Student Intern Program. The District has a successful program in place; however, it has been somewhat limited. A well-rounded Student Intern Program will benefit both the District as well as the community. Human Resources (HR) evaluated similar programs within other companies, and have referred to this information to create the framework for OCSD's new program. In developing this program HR recognizes the potential cost savings associated with actual "on the job" training an internship provides. Bringing in new talent allows the agency to train students and develop them into highly skilled workers and potentially future employees of the District. In addition to development, HR will administer and manage the newly expanded Student Intern Program. Internship Program Objectives OCSD's internship will be part of a student's educational plan to explore a given career path that integrates classroom study with planned, supervised work. It will allow students to explore opportunities at the District, establish professional relationships, receive mentoring, and provide the District with innovative ideas, and a motivated low cost workforce. Advantages for the District • Increases the pool of qualified applicants who can meet current and future workforce demands • Reduces the cost of employee recruitment, selection and training • Strengthens the link between work and learning, by giving students an opportunity to be involved in real life work experiences in the field of interest • Promotes collaboration between employers and educators to support workforce development • Helps maintain good community relations 3/5/03 l i Attachment 1 P Advantages for Students • Career-related knowledge and experience • Exposure to new trends and professions • Exposure to diverse work environment • Mentoring and professional training • Professional contacts and relationships Disadvantages of the Program • Supervisory time commitment • Learning curve/training time Students may initially require a greater amount of direction and supervision; however, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages. Although both the employer and the student benefit from the program, the student benefits the most from the commitment of dedicated professionals. Proposed changes to the existing program • Transition from the existing Intern Program to a Student Program The current program is referred to as an Intern Program. By recreating the program as a Student Program, the District may be able to explore other avenues for attracting highly competent, motivated, and diverse students. • Opportunities for a "Student Program" 1. Student Interns • Students at least at the college sophomore level • Employed as an Intern year round as long as enrolled as a full-time student in fall and spring semester, or during the four quarters of the year. • Minimum of twenty hours of work per week (part-time) during school sessions • Pay scale to be established 2. Summer Interns • Students at least at the college sophomore level • Employed as an Intern during the summer months provided the Intern is enrolled in a full- time status during the fall and spring semester, or during the four quarters of the year. • Forty hours per week(full-time) • Pay scale to be established 3. Cooperative Education (School to Work Partnerships) • Students at least at the college junior level • Alternating work/study program in which student works full-time for one semester, or quarter. • In conjunction with the Student program • Student earns credit for this program in addition to hourly wage, unless limited to only credit by the college of university. 3/5/03 2 1 Q Attachment 1 • Cooperation must be established in the form of a letter agreeing with OCSD's program,from the college or university before this can be implemented • Letter from the college or university approving the program Enhancements to HR's Recruiting Strategies 1. "Link"on OCSD website to a page dedicated to the OCSD Student Intern Program • Maintained by website administrator • Printable fact sheet regarding the program • Internship opportunity listings and descriptions • Printable application 2. HR's involvement with Colleges and Universities • Establish faculty contacts • Continue involvement with campus Science, IT, Engineering, Journalism, and Communications Departments • Involvement with campus career centers • Generic non job specific advertisement on campuses regarding student opportunities • Utilize OCSD staff for information on small private programs/schools 3. Research and utilize additional Intern Specific Websites • Monstertrak.com • Internjobs.com • Internsearch.com • Internshipprograms.com • Jobweb.com • Campuscareercenter.com • Internweb.com • Internships.com Student Staffing Numbers 1. Current Staffing (Budget under Division 510) ♦ FY 02-03 Budget allows for ten Interns • ECM—(4) • Lab—(1) • Safety—(1) • Engineering/720—(1) • Air Quality— (3) ♦ District currently staffs five Interns • ECM—(2) • Air Quality—(3) 3/5/03 3 Attachment 1 2. Future Staffing • Continue basing Intern staffing numbers on Divisional needs in the annual budget process. 3. Program Costs • Estimated program cost for 10 interns is$116,000 per Decision Package dated 02/20/02 • If the program is expanded in FY03/04 then additional costs related to salaries would be determined Student Compensation 1. Current Intern Pay Scale(Hourly) • Sophomore $ 9.00 • Junior $10.00 • Senior $11.00 • 1 s'Year Grad $12.00 • 2"d Year Grad $14.00 • Phd $16.00 • Interns will receive no employee benefits. 2. Proposed Intern pay scale • Sophomore $10.00 11% increase • Junior $11.00 10% increase • Senior $12.00 9% increase • 1 st Year Grad $13.00 8% increase • 2nd Year Grad $15.00 7% increase • Phd $17.00 6% increase • Interns will receive no employee benefits. The Human Resources Department asked Johnson &Associates (J&A) to review the District's pay scale for interns. Interns were not a benchmarked classification so J&A decided to slot the position. They set the maximum of the proposed Intern range 20% lower than the lowest grade position; Office Assistant. This range of$12.185 - $15.231 is an acceptable range; however, without a graduated scale with which to establish Intern salaries, the compensation / offer becomes too subjective. Unlike regular positions within the District, in which candidates bring experience and often times educational milestones with them, an Intern brings the desire to learn and potential to increase their marketability. Additionally, in conducting salary surveys of other agencies' intern program pay scales, HR has confirmed that the proposed Intern pay schedule is aligned with other similar programs; therefore, HR recommends that the Intern pay scale be increased. Program Administration The Human Resources department will administer and manage the Student Program. This includes assisting with personnel requisitions, postings, advertising, and applicant screening, as well as working with managers and supervisors on scheduling student interviews. HR will maintain contacts at local school career centers, manage accounts with new websites, and coordinate with Communications and IT for Website design. HR will work in conjunction with District professionals to establish unique contacts with Environmental,Engineering and IT departments at local schools. 3/5/03 4 Y Attachment 1 A specific performance management system will be developed by HR and implemented with the New Student Intern Program. The Intern performance management system will be administered by supervisors to ensure they are providing students the guidance, support and development they seek from a Student Program on a quarterly basis. Students will also participate in the New Employee Orientation program. Each Division will propose a staffing number for the Student Program, based on divisional needs. Proposed Intern staffing numbers will be subject to the same approval process as regular full time employees. 3/5/03 5 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Dir. 05/14/03 05/5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-36 14 h Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor SUBJECT: Ratification of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order 29546-000-OS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 29546 issued to Health Science and Associates for completion of a Comprehensive Asbestos Survey, providing for additional sampling to comply with Environmental Protection Agency and Cal-OSHA regulations for an additional amount of $51 ,993.65, for a total amount not to exceed S113,163.00. SUMMARY In February 2001 , the District requested proposals for a comprehensive survey of both District Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 facilities to determine the location of asbestos containing materials. The Environmental Protection Agency (40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 61) requires that prior to planned construction, renovation or demolition, the building owner conduct a survey to determine the presence of asbestos containing construction materials. This survey was performed to support future maintenance and construction projects. In addition, the California Health and Safety Code (Division 20, Section 25915 through 25924) require building owners to notify building occupants of the presence and condition of asbestos containing construction materials. In July 2001 , a contract (SP-2000/01-28, purchase order number 29546-000 OS) was awarded to Health Sciences and Associates (HSA). In March 2002, HSA notified the District that the District's Request for Proposal (RFP) had underestimated the number of samples that would be required to properly characterize its facilities for the presence of asbestos. The RFP estimated that 1800 samples should be collected, which underestimated the actual number of samples required by Environmental Protection Agency (40 CFR Part 763) and Cal-OSHA (8 CCR 1529 and 5208) by approximately one third, or 600 samples. The number of samples described in the District RFP was identified from an unsolicited proposal, prior to the RPF process, for the same work from another vendor, who is familiar with District facilities. A revised job plan was submitted to the Engineering Department in March 2002 to account for the increased cost to meet the project's original scope of work. (The scope of the project was not changed.) The Engineering Department notified the Safety and Health Division that all of the necessary amendments to the contract paperwork had been completed. The project manager notified Health Science and Associates to proceed with the work. Due to an oversight, the purchase order had not been amended to account for the additional costs and the work was completed in June 2002. This oversight was discovered when Health Science and Associates submitted a duplicate invoice in March 2003. The total cost for the work, as revised by staff, now exceeds the General Manager's purchase authority and Board approval is required. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The District's bid process was utilized and in July 2001, purchase order #29546-000-OS was issued for S61 ,169.00 to Health Science and Associates. In March 2002 a request for additional funding of $51,993.65 was identified in the revised job plan, which increased the total project cost S113,163.00. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A GAwp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0501Item 14(h).Asbestos Survey.doc Revised: 8/20:01 Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 05/14/03 05/5/28/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-37 14(i) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-11 , Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, to include the following: a) Create the CIP Project Manager classification at pay range 88 ($6,578 - $8,222) and a Senior CIP Project Manager at pay grade 92 ($7,260 - $9,075) b) Create the Accounting Supervisor classification at pay grade 86 ($6,260 - $7,825) c) Move the Materials Control Supervisor classification from pay grade 81 ($5,534 - $6,917) to pay grade 83 ($5,814 - $7,267). SUMMARY From time to time, adjustments need to be made to classification structures. As new duties and responsibilities are identified as critical to the mission of the organization, classifications must be modified or added. Staff is proposing three adjustments that need to be made to the classification and compensation structure. 1 . The Capital Project Management Process was authorized to begin on June 13, 2000. The Engineering Department worked with the consulting firm the Lewis Group to increase the overall effectiveness of the District's capital project management process within applicable laws, regulations and the practices of professional engineering. One of the recommendations of the Lewis Group was to restructure the Engineering Department to include a Project Management Office (PMO) structure which will facilitate all capital projects, support project teams and maintain functional expertise. The Engineering Department began the transition to this new structure with the creation of the PMO division in July 2002. As part of that restructuring, the Engineering Department is now ready to add two new classifications, the CIP Project Manager (Attachment 2) and the Senior CIP Project Manager (Attachment 3). As part of the district-wide Classification and Compensation study, Johnson & Associates has recommended that the CIP Project Manager be slotted to pay grade 88 and the Senior CIP Project Manager be slotted to pay grade 92. These pay grades align the PMO classifications with the Senior Engineer and Engineering Supervisor classifications based on similar levels of knowledge, skills and abilities. 2. Prior to the Classification & Compensation study implementation, both Accounting Manager and Accounting Supervisor classifications existed. During the Classification & Compensation study the Accounting Supervisor classification was deleted, as there were no incumbents. The Finance Department has reevaluated the need for a managerial level position due to an upcoming vacancy. Based on the revised needs of the division, it has been determined that the position can be filled at a lower supervisory level. The proposed new classification (Attachment 4) has been evaluated and slotted at pay grade 86, the same level as the Contracts & Purchasing Supervisor. 3. The Finance Department requested that the Human Resources Department review the compensation pay grade for the Materials Control Supervisor classification. During the Classification & Compensation study, this classification was slotted at pay grade 81 . Classifications within the supervisory unit range from pay grade 81 to pay grade 92. Staff surveyed the 13 comparison agencies for positions that are comparable to the District position. Market data for the matches validates the change in pay grade from 81 to 83 (based on the 75`h percentile). Human Resources Policy C10.10, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule, has been updated to reflect the proposed modifications and is attached for review and acceptance as Attachment 5. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY There will be no immediate cost increases based on these changes. Positions for the new CIP Program Manager have been included in the FY03/04 budget package as placeholders for open promotions and the costs will be included in the budget. The Accounting Supervisor classification will be used to recruit a replacement for a resigning Accounting Manager. The change in pay grade for the Materials Control Supervisor will not result in a change in pay for the incumbent as the employee is within the new range. BUDGET IMPACT Z This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY03/04 Wage & Salary) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports',2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\Item 14(i).Classification Structure Changes.doc Revised: 8/20/01 Page 2 ALTERNATIVES Classification and compensation structure remains unchanged. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. OCSD 03-11 2. Human Resources Policy and Procedure C10.10, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule. G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Report5\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\ltem 14(i).Classificabon Structure Changes.doc Revised: 8/20/01 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 03-11 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ********************* The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. C10.10, Classification and Compensation set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: That all other terms and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be made by Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 28, 2003. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0501Item 14(i).1.doc Exhibit A Attachment 5 Orange County Sanitation District Classification and Compensation Plan Sorted by Bargaining Group Engineering Supervisor 92 $41.885 $47.120 $52.356 Exempt Supervisory Environmental Supervisor 91 $40.865 $45.973 $51.081 Exempt Supervisory Laboratory Supervisor 90 $39.868 $44,851 $49.835 Exempt Supervisory Chief Plant Operator 88 $37.948 $42.691 $47.435 Exempt Supervisory Information Technology Supervisor 87 $37.020 $41.648 $46.275 Exempt Supervisory r r777 ourttfitg$upervfsor�F�:�h'^� i-..�< n....a,--��,x.,.�•� ,3<-��..'66 .. $36.i'l5: .f. $40�3Q 3A5: ,�� `` ���`� ��� �',,.s4t >��Y ��. Contracts&Purchasing Supervisor 86 $36.115 $40.630 $45.144 Exempt Supervisory Safety&Health Supervisor 86 $36.115 $40.630 $45.144 Exempt Supervisory Senior Maintenance Supervisor 86 $36.115 $40.630 $45.144 Exempt Supervisory Employee Development Supervisor 85 $35.238 $39.643 $44.048 Exempt Supervisory Construction Inspection Supervisor 84 $34.375 $38.672 $42.969 Exempt Supervisory Aerations Supervisor 84 $34.375 $38.672 $42.969 Exempt Supervisory .s`_'}-�� �--.�...'`"�x a - y� a;� �`'�, s ` �i ,�, �� sir&- j�r a' a.. -3�'- ^�4 ����•'. � �".`<�� �: s�4'� . 8te8l�iO�.. � .wAIRH a ntenance Supervisor 82 $32.718 $36.808 $40.898 Exempt Supervisory Source Control Supervisor 82 $32.718 $36.808 $40.898 Exempt Supervisory 8 $34 926 $31i 81b $3"N &,,w ptMW now Sapew'+se5r s y Chief Scientist 90 $39.868 $44.851 $49.835 Exempt Professional Legal&Regulatory Affairs Liaison 90 $39.868 $44.851 $49.835 Exempt Professional Principal Contracts Administrator 88 $37.948 $42.691 $47.435 Exempt Professional ..s. a A, as u'z say�� rr m a $} �s :., lu .', ';< xi= �T .35 vw�8 .-.tea't sus � :.: �.3. - 3µ, t7,, ,'�„'� .. �.r/:.� �.+�Fa WIN Senior Engineer 88 $37.948 $42.691 $47.435 Exempt Professional Principal Information Technology Analyst 87 $37.020 $41.648 $46.275 Exempt Professional LIMS Administrator 86 $36.115 $40.630 $45.144 Exempt Professional Senior Regulatory Specialist 86 $36.115 $40.630 $45.144 Exempt Professional a,. > vM F••?,gs �,_„<.. c.: �. .��- 116t � 2 ° a a H rIL4fffE,_ra�.^w 0. �. ;k:- �e es, .:,._ i, _.....,. is'�r.<"� .T,at. At,.. ,,. *''• x.,._... ... ah...-.,,, u .. MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT April 14, 2003, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the Orange County Water District. The following persons were present: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Shirley McCracken Philip Anthony, Chair Norman Eckenrode, Vice Chair Larry P. Kraemer, Jr. Brian Donahue Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Brian Brady, Alternate No. 1 Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 2 Paul Walker, Alternate No. 2 Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 3 Other OCWD Directors Wes Bannister OCSD Counsel Jan Debay Brad Hogin OCWD Staff Others Present Joanne Daugherty Debra L. Bums, DDB Engineering, Inc. Shivaji Deshmukh Paul Brown, Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. Bill Everest Dick Corneille, Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. Jill Everhart David Mosher, Montgomery Watson Harza Cindy Ferch Abdul Rashidi, Montgomery Watson Harza Jenny Glasser Paul Thometz, HOK Virginia Grebbien Mike Damitrache, Northwest Pipe Company Judy-Rae Karlsen Donna Carter, Johnson/Ukropina John Kennedy Dennis MacLain, City of Huntington Beach Marilyn Kuga Randy Fuhrman, citizen Larry Labrado Michael Markus Craig Miller Mehul Patel Ron Wildermuth OCWD Counsel Joel Kuperberg PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Steve Anderson of OCSD expressed personal reservations regarding continuing business with US Filter, which is owned by Vivendi, a French-owned company. CONSENT CALENDAR Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Consent Calendar was approved as follows, with Directors Anderson, McCracken and Barr abstaining on a portion of Item No. 1 regarding Minutes of the March 10, 2003 Joint Cooperative Committee Meeting. 1. Minutes of Previous Meetings The Minutes of the February 10 and March 10, 2003 Joint Cooperative Committee Meeting are approved as mailed. 2. Contract No. GWRS 2161, AWTF Membrane Pretreatment System Pre-Selection (US Filter/Memcor): Change Order No. 4 Recommended for OCWD approval at the April 23 Board meeting: Ratify issuance of Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. GWRS 2161,AWTF Membrane Pretreatment System Pre- Selection (US Filter/Memcor) for a contract price increase in the amount of$25,398, with no time extension. 3. Union Pacific Pipeline CrossingPermit ermit Recommended for OCWD approval at the April 23 Board meeting: Accept and authorize execution of Union Pacific Railroad Pipeline Crossing Agreement in the amount of$8,565 required for construction of the northern-most reach of the pipeline, Unit III. 4. Site Lease Between the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District for Treatment Plant Site Recommended for approval at the April 23 OCWD & OCSD Board meetings: Approve and authorize execution of lease between the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District in accordance with Article 25 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project, for$1 per year, commencing on March 1, 2003, and expiring 30 years after the Groundwater Replenishment System becomes operational. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 5. Award of Contract No. GWRS-2003-1, Initial Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution Elements I & II Project Mike Markus gave a brief presentation and recommended that the Committee approve the award of Contract No. GWRS-2003-1 to the low bidder, Kiewit Pacific, in the amount of$17,139,646. (Staff budgeted $17,100,000). Mr. Markus reminded the Committee that the contract was initially going to be two separate projects; however, because the schedules were identical, the decision was made to combine the two projects to make it easier to build and to assure that there would be better coordination between the two contracts. Mr. Markus noted that the project is expected to be online by May 2004. Upon motion by Director McCracken, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the Committee recommended that both Boards, at their April 23 meetings: 1) Receive and file Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids; 2) Ratify issuance of Addenda Nos. 1 & 2; and 3) Accept bid and award Contract No. GWRS-2003-1, Initial Microfiltration /Site Power Distribution Elements I & II Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, Kiewit Pacific Co., for $ 17,139,646. 2 } 6. Adopt Joint Resolution of the Boards of Directors of Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District on Department of Health Services (DHS) Compliance Director Anthony recommended that we pursue adoption of this Joint Resolution to assure concerned citizens of the safety of the water produced by the GWR System. Bill Everest brought to the Committee's attention that a revised Resolution that had been reviewed by General Counsel was distributed. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director McCracken and carried,the Committee recommended that both Boards, at their April 23 meetings, authorize adoption of a Resolution agreeing to comply with all conditions recommended by the Department of Health Services for the Groundwater Replenishment System. 7. Design Services and Engineering Services During Construction for the GWR System Warehouse Expansion and Workshops Bill Everest briefly discussed fee negotiations and the selection of Hellmuth, Obata &Kassabaum, Inc. (HOK) for design and engineering services during construction of the GWR System warehouse expansion and workshops. Upon motion by Director Anthony,seconded by Director McCracken and carried, the Committee recommended that the Board, at the April 23 Board meeting, authorize issuance of a task order to HOK to complete design services and engineering services during construction for the GWR System Warehouse Expansion and Workshops, for an amount not to exceed $414,150. INFORMATION 8. Project Schedule and Budget Update Mike Markus presented the monthly update on cost and schedule of the GWR System. He explained that the cumulative monthly expenditure curve illustrates the cost of the project from April 2001 through September 2007, and emphasized that the actual curve nearly identically matches the projected curve as of the end of February 2003. Mr. Markus pointed out that since April 2002 when both Boards decided to go forward with the GWR System, approximately$26 million has currently been spent on both design and construction, and that expenditures are where they should be on the project. He explained that variations in spikes on the month-by-month projection of expected expenditures on the project represent award of the advanced water treatment facility(AWTF), but that costs are where they should be with the total cost. He explained that the first spike in May 2003 occurs shortly after notice to proceed is issued on the AWTF contract and a notice to commence fabrication is given to US Filter and Trojan. The notice to commence fabrication triggers a contractual obligation to pay twenty-five percent (25%) of the contract amount. The second spike occurs in November 2003 when the equipment is delivered to the site. Mr. Markus summarized the schedules for each of the seven major contracts for the GWR System as follows: 3 Southeast Barrier Pipeline - Despite pipe delivery and weather problems, this project is scheduled for completion by mid or late September 2003. Initial Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution- This project is right on schedule and is anticipated to go before both Boards in April 2003. The notice to proceed is expected to be issued in May 2003, and completion is expected in May 2004. GWR Unit 3 Pipeline- This project was to be brought to Committee this evening; however,due to permit changes with the Orange County Flood Control District(OCFCD), this project will be brought to Committee next month. This delay is not critical to the overall operational date of April 2007. GWR Unit 2 Pipeline- A slight delay is being caused by having to resolve the bike trail detour. Staff is at 95% on the design drawings. Once the neighborhoods have accepted the proposed resolution to this problem,permits will be obtained and the project will be put out to bid. Barrier Wells and Facilities - A slight delay was due to determining the process control system on the barrier facility, which was originally thought to use radio. The decision was made to use fiber optics, and design is proceeding accordingly. Staff will return to this Committee on the barrier project in September of this year. GWR Unit 1 Pipeline- This project is scheduled to return to Committee in June 2003 to advertise plans and specifications. Staff will be meeting with the Corps of Engineers to discuss the alignment that staff has chosen along initial stages of the pipeline. Staff will provide an update at next month's meeting. AWTF Contract - This main contract is right on schedule. 9. Southeast Barrier Pipeline Progress Mike Markus updated the Committee on construction of the Southeast Barrier Pipeline. 10. Status Report Site Security - Mike Markus reported that OCSD has enacted a policy that OCWD has been following as far as access by vehicle to both sites. This program, instituted by OCSD, provides that certain actions be taken during high or severe risk levels. Virginia Grebbien stated that,because of the many common points of entry between our two sites and OCSD's intent to place concrete barricades to protect their sites, OCSD's efforts would be incomplete if OCWD does not participate in this joint security effort. 4 r Public Information and Education Update- Ron Wildermuth informed the Committee that an OCSD Board member suggested that two scenes from the current GWRS cable television ad be changed for urban runoff reasons. Following a brief discussion, the Committee recommended that a special meeting of the Public Information and Education Committee (PIE) be called to review this television ad as well as to address other public outreach programs. Director Anthony announced that all Board members will be notified to attend the Public Information and Education Meeting held on the fourth Tuesday of each month at 1:00 p.m. Grants and Loans Update- Bill Everest reported that approval to award the Initial Microfiltration project(IlVIF)has finally been received from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). He also reported that the draft contract from the Department of Water Resources (DWR) has also been received. DIRECTORS' ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS Ideas for a GWR System Visitors' Center will be discussed at a future date. ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION [Government Code Section 54956.9(a)] Pall Corporation v. OCWD—Superior Court Case No. 02CCO6622 The Closed Session was deferred to the next Committee meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Director Philip Anthony, Chairman 5 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 5/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Hardat Khublall, Project Manager SUBJECT: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve plans and specifications for Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, & 3 to the Plans and Specifications (3) Receive and file bid protest letter dated May 1, 2003 from Colich Construction; (4) Receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated May 19, 2003: (5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (6) Reject the Bid Protest of Colich Construction and waive any irregularity associated with the Bidders Bond, Power of Attorney, submitted by ARB. Inc.; and (7) Award a Construction Contract to ARB, Inc., for Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, for an amount not to exceed $5,089,040. SUMMARY • This project will correct the hydraulic deficiencies on the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, identified in the 1999 Strategic Plan, as well as provide replacement of sewer pipe in locations where offset joints and sags in the existing pipe have caused structural deficiencies identified through an inspection program. • The project is located within the City of Huntington Beach along Los Patos Avenue between Marina View Place and Bolsa Chica Street, along Bolsa Chica Street between Los Patos Avenue and Warner Avenue, and along Warner Avenue between Bolsa Chica Street and Springdale Street. The project consists of approximately one mile of 18, 21, 24, and 36 inch sewer pipe. • The plans and specifications were completed by Tetra Tech, Inc. in March 2003. Sealed bids were received on April 29, 2003. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget $7,026,000 Construction Budget $5,412,000 Engineer's Estimate $5,400,000 Low Bid $5.089,040 Low Responsive Bid $5,089,040 High Bid $8,299,000 Number of Bids 9 • General Counsel's office has analyzed the bid protest submitted by the second lowest bidder, Colich Construction and recommends that the bid protest be rejected. • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to the low bidder, ARB, Inc., for an amount not to exceed $5,089,040. Pagel PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of $5,089,040 for the construction contract, $217,000 for construction administration and $343,000 for construction is being requested to cover increased construction staff costs; $152,960 is being put into contingency. An additional $170,000 for design is being requested to cover increased design staff costs. These authorizations are within the project's budget for FY2002/03. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item FY2002/03, CIP Budget Section 8, Page 52) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A Bid Protest was filed by the second lowest bidder, Colich Construction, alleging ARB, Inc., the low bidder, failure to file with the County Clerk the required power of attorney relating to the Bidder's Bond. The District's General Counsel has reviewed the Bid Protest and requested that ARB, Inc. provide supporting documents to show compliance with the District's Bid Documents Section 15, Page 17 of 62. General Counsel has also requested that Colich Construction provide a certificate from the County Clerk's office stating that the insurer has not been certified by the Insurance Commissioner or an affidavit stating facts that establish the insufficiency of ARB, Inc. insurer. These documents submitted by ARB, Inc. and Colich Construction were reviewed by General Counsel and an analysis report has been prepared (See Attached) and will be presented to the Board of Directors as part of General Counsels Report. ALTERNATIVES The Board of Directors could reject all bids received and re-bid the project. Staff does not recommend this alternative based on legal counsels opinion. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Correspondence from Colich Construction dated May 1, 2003 2. General Counsel's Memorandum dated May 19, 2003 3. Bid Tabulation 4. Budget Information Table DAL:HK:jo:sa G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503\Item 16.11-22.doc Page 2 FAPCOLICH C O N S T R U C T 1 O N May 1, 2003 Ms. Penny Kyle Board Secretary via fax to (714) 962-0356 Orange County Sanitation District & First Class Mail (2 pages) 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA Re: Bid Protest: ARB, Inc. / Failure to Follow The District's Requirements Warner Avenue Relief Sewer/ Contract No.: 11-22 / Bid Date: April 29, 2003 Dear Ms. Kyle: This letter is written to the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). The purpose is to inform the Board, that based upon information and belief, the bid submitted by ARB, Inc. (ARB) is non-responsive and that the award of this OCSD contract to any bidder besides the apparent low-bidder, Colich Construction, LP (Colich), would violate the laws, standards and practices applicable to competitive bidding on public works projects in California. Upon review of the bid submitted by ARB and research with the County of Orange, we note the following failure to follow OCSD requirements. In the Notice Inviting Bids, on page 2 of 62, this requirement is given: "All bidders are hereby notified that it is required that the person executing the Bidder's bond must have on file with the County Clerk, County of Orange, a Power ofAttorney and authorization to execute said Bond for and on behalf of the corporate surety. " Also in the OCSD project documents on page 5 of 62, paragraph 9, and on page 17 of 62, Section 15 on Surety Bonds, the same surety requirement is stated. In Section 15, the legal source of this requirement is given: "All bonds required to be submitted relating to this contract must comply with California Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.630 and be executed by a person authorized by virtue of a valid power of attorney which is in effect and on file with the County Clerk of the County of Orange. " The Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. is the surety on the Bid Bond ARB submitted for this project. This Bid Bond was signed by Donna J. Frowd as the Attorney in Fact for Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. The authority given to Donna Frowd is shown on a Power of Colich Const1 L.'.' St.. Torr. 3� C` Attorney form. However, such a Power of Attomey for Donna Frowd is not on file with the County Clerk of the County of Orange as required in at least three places in the OCSD project documents as well as in the Califomia Code of Civil Procedure. Ms. Linda Wallace, the County employee who is in charge of these filings, informs me of the fact that such a Power of Attorney from Liberty Mutual is not on file with the County Clerk of Orange County. Ms. Wallace can be reached at (714) 935-6061. This failure of ARB to follow these stated OCSD instructions makes ARB's bid nonresponsive. Colich, and undoubtedly the other bidders, read these OCSD instructions and so informed their surety or surety brokers. After reading these requirements, Aon, Colich's broker, send the Bid Bond to the surety's office where it was signed by an Attorney in Fact whose Power of Attorney is on file with the County of Orange. Contractors bidding public works must not overlook a requirement that is stated in three places in the contract documents as well as in the California Codes. In addition to preventing possible fraud against OCSD, it would afford a competitive advantage to a bidder who does not follow stated requirements over the contractors who do study the specifications in order to follow exact instructions. Colich requests, under California Government Code section § 54954.1, mailed notice of all meetings of the awarding authority for this contract at which any issues pertaining to the award of this contract are on the meeting agenda. If there is any fee for this service, please telephone this information to us immediately, so we can promptly pay the fee. Colich also requests to address the awarding authority for this contract before or during its consideration of any issues pertaining to the award of the contract, which opportunity is guaranteed by California Government Code section § 54954.3(a). If this letter is not sufficient to accomplish any of these purposes, please let us know immediately what else is required, so we can comply. If we do not hear from you, we will proceed on the basis that this letter is sufficient. If additional information is needed, please contact the undersigned. Thank you for your attention to this matter and the anticipated award of this contract to Colich Construction. Respectfully Submitted, r,�w a&-v--� Theodore C. Anderson General Counsel C: Ms. Linda Wallace, County of Orange Mr. Blake Anderson, OCSD General Manager Mr. David Ludwin, OCSD Director of Engineering 2 LAW OFFICES OF ` WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: May 19, 2003 RE: Contract No. 11-22 Bid Protest The District recently opened bids for the above-referenced contract relating to the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer. Those bids were submitted pursuant to a Notice Inviting Bids as required under the State Public Contract Code. The bids were all submitted as sealed proposals, and were in furtherance of detailed Plans and Specifications, which had been previously approved by the District. The bid documents specified that the person executing the bidder's bond must have on file with the County Clerk of the County of Orange a power of attorney and authorization to execute the bond for and on behalf of the corporate surety. The State Legislature has modified the requirements for bonds to provide an alternative to having the power of attorney on file with the County Clerk . This alternative allows the bidder to submit a copy of the power of attorney attached to the bond when the bond is submitted. The bond is now required to be approved if either the power of attorney is on file with the County Clerk or a copy of the power of attorney was attached to the bond submitted as part of the bid proposal. Upon opening bids, the apparent low bidder was ARB, Inc. ("ARB"), which, although it does not have on file a power of attorney with the County Clerk, did submit a power of attorney attached to the bond. By doing so, ARB has complied with the bid bond requirements established by the State Legislature. By letters dated May 1, 2003 and May 9, 2003, the District received a protest from an unsuccessful bidder, Colich Construction, LP, which protested the bid of ARB based on failure to comply with the language in the bid documents requiring the person executing the bidder's bond to have on file with the County Clerk of the County of Orange a power of attorney and authorization to execute the bond for and on behalf of the corporate surety. Colich Construction urges that the bid is, therefore, invalid, and should be rejected. This office was presented with the protest and all of the relevant documents, and upon review, we have concluded that ARB received no financial or other bid advantage by having 1168802\1 May 19, 2003 Page 2 submitted a power of attorney with the bidder's bond instead of having the power of attorney on file with the County Clerk. We have further concluded that (1) ARB has complied with the current legal requirements established by the State Legislature for powers of attorney associated with bidder's bonds; and (2) Colich Construction, LP suffered no financial or bidding disadvantage as a result of this variance from the bid documents. Generally speaking, defects in the bidding process are of two distinct categories — namely, bidder responsibility and bid responsiveness. It is clear in the present case that the responsibility of the apparently successful low bidder, ARB, is not called into question, either by means of the protest itself or by virtue of the failure to have the power of attorney on file with the County Clerk. Rather it is a question of responsiveness to the bid, namely, compliance with the procedural requirements. There is a third concept of importance in bid processing— namely, the District's power to waive minor irregularities. This issue relates solely to responsiveness and not to bidder responsibility. The courts have made it clear that to be waivable, the irregularity or defect must not "make the bidding process unfair" or "give the bidder an unfair advantage by allowing him to withdraw his bid without forfeiting the bid bond." (Menefee v. County of Fresno (1985) 163 Cal. App. 3d 1165.) It is the opinion of the undersigned that the District is authorized to waive the irregularity, and in doing so, would not make the bidding process unfair or give ARB an unfair advantage. RECOMMENDATION Reject the protest, waive any irregularity associated with ARB's failure to have the power of attorney on file with the County Clerk, and award the bid to the apparent low bidder, ARB. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL By THOMAS F. NfXON cc: Mr.B.P.Anderson Mr. D.L.Ludwin Mr.J.Herberg Mr. H.Khublall Ms. P. Kyle Thomas L.Woodruff,Esq. \168802\1 April 29 1 r.00 2003 a ADDF -rnA Np3. r, 2& � ' k T ' Engineer° vAR/V l q g g U C A T 10 N kwtj s'Fstirnate: N Cp ACTS RELIEF $5,440 000 Np y/ 2P ll R �' l nc. CANT RACT p Co nstru ctio n COntr 2' Co/i R act Budget ch nstruction 3' Colich ° %Tq� 8/D& SOns 4 Steve Bubalo 089 5. W q Ra Construction CO $ 040.00 6. S sic COnstructio 5,Ogg 349 00 °uthern Cal/fornia n Co., /nc 5,25g�4S75/ � Utah � /'ac/f/c Co Under rOunc/Co 5,789,40 � 0. 8• M�aden Bu Cons Co. nstructOrs, lnc 5 00 9 den ntrch COnstru $ '84 ,Opp 00 /h T hOm son, loc. ctrOn Co. /nC• 6 043,540.00 is a esro leveed the $ 6,822,000 $5,489,40 able b* Pro he sa/s subnti 747 00 he lowest anc/b�, rem �eor the aboV $ 8 ,053 p0 st bid, nd award to ARB ct and find t ,2gg 400 00 Inc,, in the badta e love of mount of Dav/d Director of E win, p E 0os7 n9/neer/n Revised p 6 g 9/98 °Cgs . 8127 , Fountan va//eK CA 92�28 8 127 (714) 962 2411 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO.11-22 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHOWED PROJECT BUDGET AMSED AUTHORIZED AUT14ORIZATIM TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE AEOUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Prol,cl D—Iopmool S 10200 S 47,000 S 1.718 $ 48,718 S Iz000 S 6,718 S 48.718 S 48,718 100°.. St.d..P.-Mim $ 10,000 S 10,000 $ 1.718 $ 8.2821 S IO.000 $ 6718 $ 3282 S 1,5661 48. Consultant PSA s 215 000 S 285,000 S 285.000 S 282.479 S 282.479 S 282.479 100-. D,,Ig,SIM1 S 115,000 S 115000 1 170.000 1 285.000 S 110.000 S 1701000 S 280,000 S 2700540 9T. CO-WCbon COMWt $ 2,160.500 S 50412.000 S (322qgWl S 5089,040 S 5.089040 S 5.0894040 0•. ConsWOOon A6ntNSUabon S 536,100 S 217.000 S 217.000 s 217000 1 S 217.000 0•. C9nstnxbon In S 208,000 S 343.000 S 343.000 3J3.000 $ 343.000 Con 1 929.500 S 5 77.000 S 152,960 $ 719.960 PROJECT TOTAL 1 4.184.300 S 7,026.000 $ 7.026.000 S 444 J79 S 5.819040 S 6263.519 S 603.303 10•. ROmbur•.ablO Cosh PROJECT NET I S 4,184,300 S 7.026.000 S 7.026.000 $ 444.479 S 5.819,040 1 S 6.263.519 1 S 603.303 3747401 FAH R COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 05/14/03 05/28/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-38 17 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES. CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES, PERMIT USER CHARGES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES FOR 2003-04 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION The FAHR Committee voted to move this item to the Board without a recommendation: Adopt proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-20, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Revised Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Revised Capital Facilities Capacity Charges; Reaffirming Established Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-18 and Ordinance No. OCSD-19. SUMMARY Last month the Committee considered this action in concept. Tonight's action is to actually recommend the fees to the Board for adoption. User fees for non-residential users and for permit users are included in the discussion, as are capital facilities capacity charges, or connection fees. The basic user fee rate for 2002-03 was $87.50 per year for a single-family residence, and other users are charged a percentage of that rate based upon quantity and strength of the average wastewater discharge. Non-residential user rates range from 70/o to 796% of the single-family residential rate per 1 ,000 square feet of building. No changes are proposed for these ratios. Preliminary budget analysis for 2003-04 indicates a single-family fee of $105.00 will be sufficient to meet our cash flow needs. This will be an increase in fees for most Revenue Areas and a recapture of a portion of previously implemented, but set aside fees in Revenue Areas 1 and 13. The rates for non-residential users will also be considered as a part of this action. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY General User Fee revenue for 2003-04 is expected to be approximately $94 million, a 220/o increase from the current year as a result of these proposed rates and service area growth. The County Tax Collector-Treasurer charges us for a copy of the database, updates, and for minor programming. The County Auditor charges us, via deduction G:tvp.dla\agenda\Board Agenda Reporls'2003 Board Agenda Reports�050111em 17.Ordinance 20.doc Revised: ar20101 Page 1 from fees collected, for the actual collection expenses. Annual collection costs are approximately $220,000 or .2% of the sewer service fees. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Non-Residential Users Flow, BOD and SS discharge data was collected from the field. other agencies and research papers for various types of non-residential users. These statistics were used to determine the average use per 1 ,000 square feet of building for nearly 100 types of non-residential users. This average use was then converted to a percentage of the single-family residential rate. These percentages range from 70/o to 796%. In 1998, after the Rate Advisory Committee process, the Board adopted a revised user fee rate structure. A focal point of this structure was that the non-residential rates become based upon wastewater flow and strength per 1 ,000 square feet of development, rather than the same flat rate for all non-residential users. Permit Users A subgroup of non-residential users is the permit users. Our Source Control Division issues annual permits to about 500 commercial and industrial users who have the potential to have a significant impact on the treatment process or the quality of our effluent. In 2000, the Directors adopted a rate calculation methodology that standardized the constituent rates (Flow, BOD, and SS) for these permit users so that they are consistent with the rates used for the general user. These rates are then applied to the actual flow, BOD and SS for each permit user. The proposed 2003-04 rates are based upon the single-family residential sewer service user fee and the actual costs to treat Flow, BOD and SS follow: Domestic __Permit User Flow Per MG BOD Per 1,000# SS per 1000# Equivalent Class I and II S316.38 $233.00 $230.14 $105.00 Special Purpose Discharge Permit $316.38 S233.00 S230.14 S105.00 Capital Facilities Capacity Charge The charge new development pays to connect to our sewerage system through a local sewer is called a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC). The existing rates were developed as a part of the Rate Advisory Committee process during the adoption of the 1999 Strategic Plan. The rates are based upon the capital improvement program, G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Repons2003 Board Agenda Reports',05034tem 17.0rdinance 20.doc Revised: 8/20/01 Page 2 . E allocation of the program to capacity, improved treatment and rehabilitation projects, as well as to flow, BOD and solids removal projects. 0 The rates for residential and non-residential development are based upon the average projected system demand for that type of user. The rates are designed to capture the costs of existing facilities and new capacity that should be allocated to new users. In 2000, the Committee recommended and the Board approved a policy that maintains constant CFCC rates for the years between Master Plan or Strategic Plan updates. The theory behind that action was that only at that time did we revise our total capital improvement program and the future total number of users. Last year the Board adopted the Interim Strategic Plan Update which revised the flow and population data used in the CFCC calculation. The final capital improvement program was deferred pending the validation effort recently completed by I PMC. Staff has used data from each of these planning efforts to develop the proposed Capital Facilities Capacity Charges for next year. No changes are proposed to the structure or format of these charges. CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Current Proposed Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Base Charge Commercial - Industrial Per 1,000 square feet Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 110.00 $ 170.00 Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 675.00 $1,040.00 High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,600.00 $2,470.00 Single-Family Residential Per Unit 5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530.00 $3,890.00 4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165.00 $3,330.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820.00 $2,800.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,475.00 $2,270.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130.00 $1,740.00 Multi-Family Residential Per Unit 4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965.00 $3,020.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,620.00 $2,490.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275.00 $1,960.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910.00 $1,400.00 Studio Per Unit $ 580.00 $ 890.00 G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\0503%em 17.Ordinance 20.doc Revised: 8/20101 Page 3 � r ALTERNATIVES :a None. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report 2. Draft Ordinance GGS:Ic G:\wp.dta\agendaXBoard Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\050311tem 17.Ordinance 20.doc Revised: 8/20/01 Page 4 M6 a � 6 C�b l+ May 5, 2003 STAFF REPORT Sewer User Fees BACKGROUND OCSD collects three types of sewer user fees using two methods of collection. Annual fees are collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill for two types: residential users and non-residential users. Quarterly invoices are mailed directly to approximately 500 Permit Users. These users have been ident'rfied by our Source Control Division as those with "priority pollutants," or with potential for a significant impact on the treatment process. Residential users are charged a flat rate for each house or unit. Although we typically refer to the residential rate as the rate for a single-family residence (SFR), there are actually three residential rates based upon average flow relationships. The SFR rate proposed for 2003-04 is $105.00. The rate for each unit in an apartment complex, the MFR or multi-family rate, is 70% of the SFR rate or$73.50. The final residential rate is for mobile homes that have been shown by census and flow data to discharge 50% of the SFR flow. Therefore, the proposed annual rate for mobile homes is$52.50. These fees for residential use are collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill and provide about two-thirds of our user fee income. The five-year schedule of proposed residential sewer user fees is shown in Attachment 1. The Directors will recall that the July 2002, decision to move to secondary treatment discharge standards as rapidly as possible included two directives. One was to maximize currently available secondary treatment facilities, which increases operations and maintenance expenses, and the second was to design and build additional facilities, which increases the capital outlay. Both of these initiatives will increase costs and fees for several years. Despite the proposed user fee increases, our ratepayers continue to get a lot for their money. In a recently released national survey, the Association of Municipal Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) reported that in 2002, the average rate component of those agencies that had rates and some property tax was $130 per year(the minimum was the OCSD rate of$78). The current five-year rate schedule will put OCSD users at $126 in 2004-05, a full three years after the national average was $130. We will not reach the$192 high rate of 2002 until 2005. The five-year rate proposed for all users is shown in Attachment 1, while the residential rates are summarized below. ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE USER FEES 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 SFR $105.00 $126.00 $151.00 $181.00 $217.00 MFR $73.50 $88.20 $105.70 $126.70 $151.90 OCSD P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Vallcy.CA 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Non-Residential Sewer User Fees Page 2 of 2 May 5, 2003 The non-residential user fees collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill account for about one-third of our total user fees. As a part of the Rate Advisory Committee process during the 1999 Strategic Plan, use ratios were developed for nearly 100 types of non- residential development. These ratios are the result of calculating average flow, BOD and SS discharges for the various user groups, allocating the total use to square feet of building and comparing that to a typical SFR. The result is a listing of 28 rates per 1,000 square feet of building expressed as a percentage of the annual SFR rate. As one might expect, these ratios range from a low of 7%for warehouses to a high of 796%for car washes. The annual rates for these non-industrial users are not adopted separately. The ratios are adopted and specified in the Ordinance. The user rates are a simple multiplication, then, of the proper ratio and the SFR rate that is adopted. The impact of rate changes on these non-residential users as groups can be shown in Attachment 2. This schedule lists the categories of use, the number of parcels and square feet, the SFR ratio, the current and proposed rates, the current and proposed total annual charges, the proposed total increase, and the average increase. The total annual non-residential impact is expected to be approximately$5 million, or$200 per parcel. The largest average impact is projected to be on hotels and lowest on used car lots. The average impact was calculated on a per parcel basis, which should approximate a per business basis. The total annual charges are calculated on the basis of square feet within the buildings. The Permit User is also a non-residential user. Any fees collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill are deducted for the actual Permit User fee. The nearly 500 Permit Users paid approximately$5 million this year after adjustments for property taxes and user fees collected on the tax bill. These users are billed directly based upon actual flow, BOD and SS discharged to the sewers. The gross impact on the rate proposal is shown on Attachments 3 and 4. This is the total cost of service and the impact of the proposed rates before adjustments for property taxes and user fees from the property tax bill. The quantities used for the analysis are from 2000-01 and will not be used for next year's invoices. The Permit Users are listed in the order of total charges for 2002-03 on Attachment 3, and alphabetically on Attachment 4. The proposed permit user rates for 2003-04 and a comparison to 2002-02 are shown below. 2003-04 2002-03 Alternative Actual Increase Flow, mg $316.38 $282.92 $33.46 BOD, 1,000# $233.00 $190.65 $42.35 SS, 1,000# $230.14 $184.55 $45.59 The component rates increase at different percentages based upon operations and maintenance costs per unit process and the CIP attributable to flow, BOD or SS. The most significant factor in the rate calculation this year is the change in the capital improvement program (CIP) for 2003-04. Because of the Board's direction to reach secondary treatment standards within the next ten years, the ten-year CIP and increased emphasis on BOD and SS have shifted the rates away from flow. GGS:lc G:\wp.dta\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2003\MAY\Non-Residential Sewer User Fees.doc OCSD Sewer User Fee Projections Fiscal Years 2003-04 through 2007-08 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Residential Users Single Family Residence $ 105.00 $ 126.00 $ 151.00 $ 181.00 $ 217.00 Multi-Family Residence (per unit) 73.50 88.20 105.70 126.70 151.90 Non Residential Users (per 1,000 sq ft) Group 1 7% $ 7.40 $ 8.80 $ 10.60 $ 12.70 $ 15.20 Group 2 10% 10.50 12.60 15.10 18.10 21.70 Group 3 17% 17.90 21.40 25.70 30.80 36.90 Group 4 20% 21.00 25.20 30.20 36.20 43.40 Group 5 23% 24.20 29.00 34.70 41.60 49.90 Group 6 27% 28.40 34.00 40.80 48.90 58.60 Group 7 29% 30.50 36.50 43.80 52.50 62.90 Group 8 30% 31.50 37.80 45.30 54.30 65.10 Group 9 41% 43.10 51.70 61.90 74.20 89.00 Group 10 50% 52.50 63.00 75.50 90.50 108.50 Group 11 51% 53.60 64.30 77.00 92.30 110.70 Group 12 53% 55.70 66.80 80.00 95.90 115.00 Group 13 70% 73.50 88.20 105.70 126.70 151.90 Group 14 82% 86.10 103.30 123.80 148.40 177.90 Group 15 85% 89.30 107.10 128.40 153.90 184.50 Group 16 97% 101.90 122.20 146.50 175.60 210.50 Group 17 100% 105.00 126.00 151.00 181.00 217.00 Group 18 101% 106.10 127.30 152.50 182.80 219.20 Group 19 102% 107.10 128.50 154.00 184.60 221.30 Group 20 112% 117.60 141.10 169.10 202.70 243.00 Group 21 124% 130.20 156.20 187.20 224.40 269.10 Group 22 139% 146.00 175.10 209.90 251.60 301.60 Group 23 144% 161.20 181.40 217.40 260.60 312.50 Group 24 151% 158.60 190.30 228.00 273.30 327.70 Group 25 226% 237.30 284.80 341.30 409.10 490.40 Group 26 300% 315.00 378.00 453.00 543.00 651.00 Group 27 600% 630.00 756.00 906.00 1,086.00 1,302.00 Group 28 796% 835.80 1,003.00 1,202.00 1,440.80 1,727.30 Permit Users Flow, per million gallons $ 316.38 $ 389.79 $ 485.10 $ 577.21 $ 686.40 BOD, per 1,000 pounds 233.00 278.06 330.43 396.81 476.59 SS, per 1,000 pounds 230.14 272.08 318.63 383.66 462.47 G:\excel.dta\fin\210\streed\old d copy\STRATPLN\2003-04 5 year rate sch.xls 5/3/2003 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 3 Rate Change Impact on Sewer Service User Fees Collected on Property Tax Bill 2002-03 to 2003-04 Rate 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Average Assessor Total Total Percent Rate Per Total Rate Per Total Total Increase Code Description Parcels Sq_Feet/Units of SFR 1000 sq ft Fees loco sq ft Fees Increase Per Parcel 2 ONE RESIDENCE 420,143 100% $ 87.50 $36,763,000 $ 105.00 $44,115,000 $7,352,000 $17 3 TWO OR MORE SFR 6,390 13,744 70% $ 61.25 $842,000 $ 73.50 $1,010,000 $168.000 $26 4 MISC IMPROVEMENT 143 1,073,616 100% $ 87.50 $13,000 $ 105.00 $15,000 $2,000 $14 5 COMMON AREA PARCEL - - 0% $ - $ - $0 6 "HOLD"PARCEL - - 0% $ - $ - $0 7 MOBILEHOME 12,349 14,835,649 50% $ 43.75 $540.000 $ 52.50 $648,000 $108,000 $9 8 EQUIV TO VACANT - - 0% $ - $ - $0 10 DUPLEX ONLY 5,352 10,716 70% $ 61.25 $656.000 $ 73.50 $788,000 $132,000 $25 11 TRIPLEX ONLY 1,956 5,875 70% $ 61.25 $360,000 $ 73.50 $432,000 $72,000 $37 12 04-UNITS ONLY 6,781 27,092 70% $ 61.25 $1,659,000 $ 73.50 $1,991,000 $332,000 $49 13 5 TO 16 UNITS 4,003 35,222 70% $ 61.25 $2,157,000 $ 73.50 $2,589,000 $432,000 $108 14 17 TO 25 UNITS 587 12.128 70% $ 61.25 $743,000 $ 73.50 $891,000 $148,000 $252 15 26-40 UNITS ONLY 336 11,904 70% $ 61.25 $729,000 $ 73.50 $875,000 $146,000 $435 16 41-99 UNITS ONLY 552 35,291 70% $ 61.25 $2,162,000 $ 73.50 $2,594,000 $432,000 $783 17 100 OR MORE UNITS 393 71,710 70% $ 61.25 $4,392,000 $ 73.50 $5,271,000 $879,000 $2,237 18 A MIX OF FORMS 3,367 19,535,824 70% $ 61.25 $206,000 $ 73.50 $247,000 $41,000 $12 19 SFR WITH 1 OR 2 RENTALS 52 116 85% $ 74.38 $9,000 $ 89.25 $10,000 $1,000 $19 Total Residential Fees 462,404 $51,231,000 $61,476,000 $10,245,000 $22 20 AMUSEMENT PARKS 11 856,904 144% $ 126.00 $108,000 $ 151.20 $130,000 $22,000 $2,000 21 AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP 182 3,552,311 41% $ 35.88 $127,000 $ 43.05 $153,000 $26,000 $143 22 AUTO REPAIR SHOP 580 2,675,867 41% $ 35.88 $96,000 $ 43.05 $115,000 $19,000 $33 23 AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 371 1,945,654 41% $ 35.88 $70,000 $ 43.05 $84,000 $14,000 $38 24 USED CAR LOT 88 167,830 41% $ 35.88 $6,000 $ 43.05 $7,000 $1,000 $11 26 AIRPORT AND RELATED 4 66,318 53% $ 46.38 $3,000 $ 55.65 $4,000 $1,000 $250 28 BOWLING ALLEYS 12 399,613 112% $ 98.00 $39,000 $ 117.60 $47,000 $8,000 $667 29 CONVENTIONAL CAR WASH 76 207,724 796% $ 696.50 $145,000 $ 835.80 $174,000 $29,000 $382 30 COIN OPERATED CAR WASH 45 112,872 151% $ 132.13 $15,000 $ 158.55 $18,000 $3,000 $67 32 CEMETERY&RELATED 24 353,642 101% $ 88.38 $31,000 $ 106.05 $38,000 $7,000 $292 33 CHURCH BUILDINGS 728 11,666,530 20% $ 17.50 $204,000 $ 21.00 $245,000 $41,000 $56 34 DORMITORY 11 396,026 97% $ 84.88 $34,000 $ 101.85 $40,000 $6,000 $545 35 ENTERTAINMENT CENTER 15 1,186,001 144% $ 126.00 $149,000 $ 151.20 $179,000 $30,000 $2,000 36 FINANCIAL BUILDINGS 264 2,747,278 27% $ 23.63 $65,000 $ 28.35 $78,000 $13,000 $49 37 FRATERNAL BUILDINGS 72 710,466 51% $ 44.63 $32,000 $ 53.55 $38,000 $6,000 $83 38 FUNERAL HOME 22 146,689 101% $ 88.38 $13,000 $ 106.05 $16,000 $3,000 $136 39 GOLF COURSE 40 566,762 41% $ 35.88 $20,000 $ 43.05 $24,000 $4,000 $100 40 HEALTH CLUB 23 1,044,985 29% $ 25.38 $27,000 $ 30.45 $32,000 $5,000 $217 42 HOSPITAL 39 3,529,411 97% $ 84.88 $300,000 $ 101.85 $359,000 $59,000 $1,513 43 HOTEL 76 11,141,452 97% $ 84.88 $946,000 $ 101.85 $1,135,000 $189,000 $2,487 44 LUMBER/CONSTR MATL YARD 8 90,433 17% $ 14.88 $1,000 $ 17.85 $2,000 $1,000 $125 45 MARINAS 22 83,328 53% $ 46.38 $4,000 $ 55.65 $5,000 $1,000 $45. 47 SUPERMARKET 98 3,223,508 151% $ 132.13 $426,000 $ 158.55 $511,000 $85,000 $867 F - G:lexcel.dtalfin12101streedluse codes 02-03 adjAs 5/3/2003 Page 2 of 3 Rate Change Impact on Sewer Service User Fees Collected on Property Tax Bill 2002-03 to 2003-04 Rate 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Average Assessor Total Total Percent Rate Per Total Rate Per Total Total Increase Code Description Parcels Sq.Feett Units of SFR 1000 sq It Fees 1000 sq It Fees Increase Per Parcel 48 CONVENIENCE MARKET 137 402,779 151% $ 132.13 $53,000 $ 158.55 $64,000 $11,000 $80 50 SINGLE MEDICAL BLDGS TO 3 STORIES 853 5,709,390 124% $ 108.50 $619,000 $ 130.20 $743,000 $124,000 $145 51 SMALL MEDICAL CENTER 35 1,098,332 124% $ 108.50 $119,000 $ 130.20 $143,000 $24,000 $686 52 MEDICAL CENTER COMPLEX 21 528,141 124% $ 108.50 $57,000 $ 130.20 $69,000 $12,000 $571 53 HIGH RISE MEDICAL 41 1,466,665 124% $ 108.50 $159,000 $ 130.20 $191,000 $32,000 $780 54 CONVERTED RESIDENCE TO MEDICAL 26 51,491 124% $ 108.50 $6,000 $ 130.20 $7,000 $1,000 $38 55 MOBILE HOME PARK 204 23,944 50% $ 43.75 $1,000 $ 52.50 $1,000 $0 $0 56 MOTELS AND MOTOR HOTELS 359 10,801,430 97% $ 84.88 $917,000 $ 101.85 $1,100,000 $183,000 $510 57 MOTORCYCLE/SMALL VEHICLE BLDG 11 23,716 41% $ 35.88 $1,000 $ 43.05 $1,000 $0 $0 58 NURSERIES(PLANTS) 34 257,661 10% $ 8.75 $2,000 $ 10.50 $3,000 $1,000 $29 60 NURSING HOME 44 945,725 102% $ 89.25 $84,000 $ 107A0 $101'000 $17,000 $386 61 CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS 67 2,548,592 102% $ 89.25 $227,000 $ 107.10 $273,000 $46,000 $687 62 CONVERTED RES USED AS NURSING 16 66,590 102% $ 89.25 $6,000 $ 107.10 $7,000 $1,000 $63 63 LOW RISE RETIREMENT BUILDING 29 1,374.640 70% $ 61.25 $84.000 $ 73.50 $101,000 $17,000 $586 64 HIGH RISE RETIREMENT BUILDING 16 1,175,620 70% $ 61.25 $72,000 $ 73.50 $86,000 $14,000 $875 65 SINGLE OFFICE BLDGS TO 3 STORIES 3,618 43,765,258 41% $ 35.88 $1,570,000 $ 43.05 $1,884,000 $314,000 $87 66 SMALL OFFICE CENTER 137 5,952,919 41% $ 35.88 $214,000 $ 43.05 $256,000 $42,000 $307 67 OFFICE COMPLEX 34 4,914,494 41% $ 35.88 $176,000 $ 43.05 $212,000 $36,000 $1,059 68 HIGH RISE OFFICE 176 27,555,342 30% $ 26.25 $723,000 $ 31.50 $868,000 $145,000 $824 69 CONVERTED RESIDENCE TO OFFICE 348 641,748 41% $ 35.88 $23,000 $ 43.05 $28,000 $5,000 $14 71 PARKING GARAGE 16 1,093,443 17% $ 14.88 $16,000 $ 17.85 $20,000 $4,000 $250 72 PAVED PARKING LOT 17 290,505 17% $ 14.88 $4.000 $ 17.85 $5,000 $1,000 $59 73 RECREATION 25 457,420 144% $ 126.00 $58,000 $ 151.20 $69,000 $11,000 $440 74 RECREATION VEHICLE PARK 7 43,990 27% $ 23.63 $1,000 $ 28.35 $1,000 $0 $0 76 RESTAURANT-TAKE OUT 340 855,072 300% $262.50 $224,000 $ 315.00 $269,000 $45,000 $132 77 RESTAURANT-COFFEE SHOP 525 1,725,398 600% $ 525.00 $906,000 $630.00 $1,087,000 $181,000 $345 78 RESTAURANT-DINNER HOUSE 417 2,718,822 600% $ 525.00 $1,427,000 $630.00 $1,713,000 $286,000 $686 79 RESTAURANT-CONVERSION FROM SFR 5 22,213 600% $ 525.00 $12,000 $ 630.00 $14,000 $2,000 $400 81 PRE-SCHOOLS,NURSERY OR CARE 141 737,537 82% $ 71.75 $53.000 $ 86.10 $64,000 $11,000 $78 82 PRIVATE SCHOOLS 91 2,322,549 82% $ 71.75 $167,000 $ 86.10 $200,000 $33,000 $363 83 AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE STATION 354 675,376 41% $ 35.88 $24,000 $ 43.05 $29,000 $5,000 $14 84 MARINE SERVICE STATION 1 934 41% $ 35.88 $0 $ 43.05 $0 $0 $0 85 COMBIN:SERV STN/RESTAURANT 2 6,033 100% $ 87.50 $1,000 $ 105.00 $1,000 $0 $0 86 COMBIN:SERVICE STN/CONVIENCE MKT 137 291,788 41% $ 35.88 $10,000 $ 43.05 $13,000 $3,000 $22 88 CONVENIENCE SHOPPING CENTER 340 11,470,787 53% $ 46.38 $532,000 $ 55.65 $638,000 $106,000 $312 89 NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER 403 16,695,917 139% $ 121.63 $2,031,000 $ 145.95 $2,437,000 $406,000 $1,007 90 COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER 450 12,892,278 226% $ 197.75 $2,549,000 $ 237.30 $3,059,000 $510,000 $1,133 91 REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER 3 864,832 126% $ 110.40 $95,000 $ 132.30 $114,000 $19,000 $6,333 92 SKATING RINKS 4 106,844 112% $ 98.00 $10,000 $ 117.60 $13,000 $3,000 $750 94 DEPARTMENT STORE 30 3,108,114 23% $ 20.13 $63,000 $ 24.15 $75,000 $12,000 $400 95 DISCOUNT STORE 56 3,908,095 23% $ 20.13 $79,000 $ 24.15 $94,000 $15,000 $268 96 UNATTACHED SINGLE STORE 1,465 9,355,193 23% $ 20.13 $188,000 $ 24.15 $226,000 $38,000 $26 97 STRIP STORE 1,153 9,587,263 23% $ 20.13 $193,000 $ 24.15 $232,000 $39,000 $34 G:lexce1.dta\fin\210\streed\use codes 02-03 adjAs 5/3/2003 Page 3 of 3 Rate Change Impact on Sewer Service User Fees Collected on Property Tax Bill 2002-03 to 2003-04 Rate 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 Average Assessor Total Total Percent Rate Per Total Rate Per Total Total Increase Code Description Parcels Sq.Feet/Units of SFR 1000 sq ft Fees 1000 sq it Fees Increase Per Parcel 98 STORE WITH OFFICES OR LIV QTR 407 3,158,725 82% $ 71.75 $227,000 $ 86.10 $272,000 $45,000 $111 99 STORE W/OFFICE UPSTAIRS 43 580,595 82% $ 71.75 $42,000 $ 86.10 $50,000 $8,000 $186 100 DRIVE-IN THEATER 0 0 10% $ 8.75 $0 $ 10.50 $0 $0 101 UNATTACHED THEATER 27 888,754 51% $ 44.63 $40,000 $ 53.55 $48,000 $8,000 $296 103 CHEMICAL TANK AND BULK STORAGE 4 64,337 100% $ 87.50 $6,000 $ 105.00 $7,000 $1,000 $250 104 FOOD PROCESSING PLANT 17 1,316,765 100% $ 87.50 $115,000 $ 105.00 $138,000 $23,000 $1,353 105 COLD STORAGE PLANT 16 869,917 100% $ 87.50 $76,000 $ 105.00 $91,000 $15,000 $938 106 FACTORY 149 11,212,652 100% $ 87.50 $981,000 $ 105.00 $1,177,000 $196,000 $1,315 107 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL-SINGLE TENANT 2,016 48,062,998 50% $ 43.75 $2,103,000 $ 52.50 $2,523,000 $420,000 $208 108 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL-MULTI TENANT 876 20,074,673 50% $ 43.75 $878,000 $ 52.50 $1,054,000 $176,000 $201 109 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 36 3,578,301 50% $ 43.75 $157,000 $ 52.50 $188,000 $31,000 $861 110 WAREHOUSE-SINGLE TENANT 3,553 85,646,565 17% $ 14.88 $1,274,000 $ 17.85 $1,529,000 $255,000 $72 111 WAREHOUSE-MULTI TENANT 1,817 28,383,536 17% $ 14.88 $422,000 $ 17.85 $507.000 $85,000 $47 112 STEEL BUILDING 142 1,987,394 7% $ 6.13 $12,000 $ 7.35 $15,000 $3,000 $21 113 MINI-WAREHOUSE 167 9,711,000 7% $ 6.13 $59,000 $ 7.35 $71,000 $12,000 $72 114 INDUSTRIAL PARK 439 22,468,270 50% $ 43.75 $983,000 $ 52.50 $1,180,000 $197,000 $449 115 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE 4 4,056 17% $ 14.88 $0 $ 17.85 $0 $0 $0 116 TRUCK TERMINAL 19 892,854 17% $ 14.88 $13,000 $ 17.85 $16,000 $3,000 $158 118 GOVERNMENTAL USE 530 12,171,466 82% $ 71.75 $873,000 $ 86.10 $1,048,000 $175.000 $330 119 PUBLIC UTILITY 1 7,979 100% $ 87.50 $1,000 $ 105.00 $1,000 $0 $0 120 WATER MUTUAL OR COMPANY 6 122,772 100% $ 87.50 $11.000 $ 105.00 $13,000 $2,000 $333 000 CONVERSION-C/I,RURAL 7 153,561 $0 $0 $0 $0 888 CONVERSION-COMPOSITE PROP 27 3,240,579 100% $ 87.50 $284,000 $ 105.00 $340,000 $56,000 $2,074 Non-Residential Total 25,302 490,004,233 $25,174,000 $30.213,000 $5.039,000 $199 w G:lexce1.dtaVin12101streedluse codes 02-03 adj.xls ATTACHMENT 3 5I6I2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 1 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H 1 l K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs tbs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase A&A DEBURRING&TUMBLING INC. 0.4257 1,444 1.182 $120 $275 $218 $614 $135 $336 $272 $743 $129 A&G ELECTROPOLISH 0.3143 234 174 $89 $45 $32 $166 $99 $55 $40 $194 $28 A&R POWDER COATING INC. 0.4238 127 184 $120 $24 $34 $178 $134 $30 $42 $206 $28 A M F ELECTRONICS INC. 3.6776 2,251 2.575 $1,040 $429 $475 $1,945 $1,164 $524 $593 $2,281 $336 A P W ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS LLC SOUTH 4.0854 3,237 7,828 $1.156 $617 $1,445 $3,218 $1,293 $754 $1,802 $3,848 $631 A P W ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS,LLC 2.8923 4.386 1,979 $818 $836 $365 $2,020 $915 $1,022 $455 $2,392 $373 A R 0 SERVICE 0.2275 474 474 $64 $90 $88 $242 $72 $111 $109 $292 $49 A S M COMPANY INC. 0.8253 1,721 1.721 $233 $328 $318 $879 $261 $401 $396 $1,058 $179 ACCURATE CIRCUIT ENGINEERING 1.8284 6,282 1,246 $517 $1,198 $230 $1,945 $578 $1,464 $287 $2,329 $384 ACCURATE METAL FABRICATORS INC. 3.5061 5,627 5,049 $992 $1.073 $932 $2,996 $1,109 $1,311 $1,162 $3.582 $586 ACROBURR INC.#2 0.0707 43 45 $20 $8 $8 $37 $22 $10 $10 $43 $6 ACTIVE PLATING INC. 5.5755 1,142 1,097 $1,577 $218 $202 $1,998 $1,764 $266 $252 $2,283 $285 ADVANCE TECH PLATING INC. 0.5553 285 134 $157 $54 $25 $236 $176 $67 $31 $273 $37 ADVANCE TECH PLATING INC.#2 0.0330 69 69 $9 $13 $13 $35 $10 $16 $16 $42 $7 AERA ENERGY LLC 494.1009 53,733 70,213 $139,791 $10.244 $12,958 $162,993 $156,324 $12,520 $16,159 $185,002 $22,009 AERA ENERGY LLC#2 0.0821 171 171 $23 $33 $32 $87 $26 $40 $39 $105 $18 AIR INDUSTRIES CORP.(CHAPMAN) 1.8805 13,669 8,259 $532 $2.606 $1,524 $4,662 $595 $3,185 $1.901 $5,681 $1,018 AIR INDUSTRIES CORP.-KNOTT 11.5559 15,386 37,058 $3.269 $2,933 $6,839 $13,042 $3,656 $3,585 $8.529 $15,770 $2,728 ALEXANDER OIL COMPANY 0.1760 0 0 $50 $0 $0 $50 $56 $0 $0 $56 $6 ALL METAL PAINT STRIPPING INC.#2 0.0465 146 244 $13 $28 $45 $86 $15 $34 $56 $105 $19 ALL METALS PROCESSING OF O.C.INC. 1.0400 2,168 2,168 $294 $413 $400 $1,108 $329 $505 $499 $1,333 $225 ALLIED PACIFIC METAL STAMPING 0.6675 5.079 2,166 $189 $968 $400 $1,557 $211 $1,183 $498 $1,893 $336' ALLOY DIE CASTING CO. 1.0518 1,907 1.894 $298 $364 $349 $1,011 $333 $444 $436 $1,213 $202 ALLOY TECH ELECTROPOLISHING INC. 0.6806 250 433 $193 $48 $80 $320 $215 $58 $100 $373 $53 ALLTEK CIRCUIT INC. 2.0473 967 447 $579 $184 $82 $846 $648 $225 $103 $976 $130 ALMATRON ELECTRONICS,INC. 2.6648 2,557 2,073 $754 $487 $383 $1,624 $843 $596 $477 $1,916 $292 ALPHANETICS INC. 12A232 8.052 2,342 $3,430 $1,535 $432 $5,397 $3,836 $1,876 $539 $6,251 $853 ALSTYLE APPAREL-ACTIVEWEAR MFG.CO.INC. 433.7566 951,033 387.633 $122,718 $181.315 $71,538 $375,571 $137,232 $221,591 $89.210 $448,033 $72,462 ALTA BELLWOOD HOSPITALS INC. 0.2738 571 571 $77 $109 $105 $292 $87 $133 $131 $351 $59 ALUMINUM FORGE-DIV.OF ALUM.PRECISION 3.4055 3.014 11,953 $963 $575 $2,206 $3,744 $1,077 $702 $2,751 $4,531 $787 ALUMINUM PRECISION PRODUCTS INC.CENTRAL 1.5704 5.338 1,103 $444 $1.018 $204 $1,666 $497 $1,244 $254 $1,994 $329 ALUMINUM PRECISION PRODUCTS INC.-SUSAN 6.0653 2,412 4,304 $1,716 $460 $794 $2,970 $1,919 $562 $991 $3,472 $501 AMERICAN CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY INC. 4.0483 1,352 2,788 $1,145 $258 $515 $1,918 $1,281 $315 $642 $2.237 $320 AMERIMAX BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. 2.5048 544 1,943 $709 $104 $359 $1,171 $792 $127 $447 $1,366 $195 AMERIPEC INC. 25.4239 304.552 10,648 $7,193 $58.063 $1.965 $67,221 $8,044 $70,961 $2,451 $81,455 $14,234 AMETEKAEROSPACE 1.5314 3.193 3,193 $433 $609 $589 $1,631 $485 $744 $735 $1,963 $332 ANAHEIM EXTRUSION CO.INC. 1.5997 1,105 1.319 $453 $211 $243 $907 $506 $257 $304 $1,067 $160 ANAHEIM GENERAL HOSPITAL 7.6776 16,008 16,008 $2,172 $3,052 $2,954 $8,178 $2,429 $3,730 $3,684 $9,843 $1,665 ANAHEIM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 24.3460 50,761 50,761 $6,888 $9,678 $9,368 $25,934 $7,703 $11,827 $11,682 $31,212 $5,279 ANAHEIM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER-WEST 4.9275 10,274 10,274 $1.394 $1,959 $1,896 $5.249 $1.559 $2.394 $2.364 $6,317 $1,068 ANAHEIM PLATING&POLISHING INC. 3.4187 1,403 749 $967 $268 $138 $1,373 $1,082 $327 $172 $1,581 $208 ANAHEIM TRUCK DEPOT#2 BIN WASH 0.6163 1,285 1,285 $174 $245 $237 $656 $195 $299 $296 $790 $134 G:\excel.dlaUEn\210\streed\old d copy\STRATPLN\2003-04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 2 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs lbs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase ANGELICA TEXTILE 97.7260 54,716 43,558 $27,649 $10,432 $8,039 $46,119 $30,919 $12.749 $10,024 $53,692 $7,573 ANO D'ART,INC. 4.9479 346 2,459 $1,400 $66 $454 $1,920 $1,565 $81 $566 $2,212 $292 ANODYNE INC. 10.9589 1,929 5,590 $3,100 $368 $1,032 $4,500 $3,467 $449 $1,286 $5,203 $703 ANOMIL ENT.DBA DANCO METAL SURFACING 5.8670 511 7.450 $1,660 $97 $1,375 $3,132 $1,856 $119 $1,715 $3,690 $558 AQUA-CON COMPANY 1.2147 52 429 $344 $10 $79 $433 $384 $12 $99 $495 $62 AQUARIAN COATINGS CORPORATION 0.7831 546 320 $222 $104 $59 $385 $248 $127 $74 $449 $64 ARCO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS COMPANY 0.0548 104 104 $16 $20 $19 $55 $17 $24 $24 $66 $11 ARNOLD ELECTRONICS,INC.#1 12.7707 3,120 5,512 $3,613 $595 $1,017 $5,225 $4,040 $727 $1,269 $6,036 $811 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS CORPORATION 13.4392 11,503 12,225 $3,802 $2,193 $2,256 $8,251 $4,252 $2,680 $2,813 $9,746 $1,494 ARROWHEAD PURITAS WATERS(R!0 REJECT) 5.5100 1,812 3,418 $1,559 $345 $631 $2,535 $1,743 $422 $787 $2,952 $417 ARTISTIC PLATING&METAL FINISHING INC. 11.4569 2,561 3.269 $3,241 $488 $603 $4,333 $3,625 $597 $752 $4,974 $641 ASTECH MANUFACTURING INC. 17.6119 1,955 1,955 $4,983 $373 $361 $5,716 $5,572 $455 $450 $6,477 $761 AUTO-CHLOR SYSTEM OF WASHINGTON,INC. 0.1336 4,080 87 $38 $778 $16 $832 $42 $951 $20 $1,013 $181 AVIATION EQUIPMENT STRUCTURES,INC. 0.5027 1,048 1,048 $142 $200 $193 $535 $159 $244 $241 $644 $109 B A F INDUSTRIES 2.2747 4,503 919 $644 $858 $170 $1,672 $720 $1.049 $212 $1,980 $309 B I TECHNOLOGIES,INC. 4.4032 3,566 3.258 $1,246 $680 $601 $2,527 $1,393 $831 $750 $2,974 $447 B.BRAUN MEDICAL INC. 260.0845 102,517 51,143 $73.583 $19,545 $9,438 $102,566 $82,286 $23,886 $11,770 $117,942 $15,376 BALI OIL COMPANY 2.8369 0 1,136 $803 $0 $210 $1,012 $898 $0 $261 $1,159 $147 BASIC ELECTRONICS,INC. 0.5150 1,455 364 $146 $277 $67 $490 $163 $339 $84 $586 $95 BASIN MARINE INC. 0.1188 248 248 $34 $47 $46 $127 $38 $58 $57 $162 $26 BAZZ HOUSTON CO. 3,3170 1,859 1,690 $938 $354 $312 $1,605 $1,049 $433 $389 $1,872 $267 BEARING INSPECTION INC. 1.6625 3,539 3,981 $470 $675 $735 $1,880 $526 $825 $916 $2,267 $387' BECKMAN COULTER,INC. 14.7494 15,963 19,927 $4,173 $3,043 $3,678 $10,894 $4,666 $3,719 $4.586 $12,972 $2,078 BLACK OXIDE INDUSTRIES INC. 5.8769 1,051 1,336 $1,663 $200 $246 $2,109 $1,859 $245 $307 $2,412 $302 BOEING CO.-SEMICONDUCTOR 21.8348 43,480 43.480 $6,178 $8,289 $8,024 $22,491 $6,908 $10,131 $10,007 $27,046 $4.554 BOEING COMPANY-BLDG.271 0.4440 35 100 $126 $7 $19 $151 $140 $8 $23 $172 $21 BOEING COMPANY(GENERAL FAC) 71.6813 150.641 143.667 $20,280 $28,720 $26,514 $75,514 $22,679 $35,099 $33,063 $90,841 $15,328 BOND TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1.8748 1,903 1.903 $530 $363 $351 $1,244 $593 $443 $438 $1,474 $230 BREA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2.7375 5,708 5.708 $774 $1,088 $1,053 $2,916 $866 $1.330 $1,314 $3,510 $594 BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION 10A391 2,033 2,033 $2,869 $388 $375 $3,631 $3,208 $474 $468 $4.149 $518 BRIGHT ARMOUR PLATING 3.6804 275 1,607 $1,041 $52 $297 $1,390 $1,164 $64 $370 $1,598 $208 BRINDLElTHOMAS 0.1460 0 0 $41 $0 $0 $41 $46 $0 $0 $46 $5 BRINDLEITHOMAS OIL COMPANY 2.1900 20,347 603 $620 $3,879 $111 $4,610 $693 $4,741 $139 $5,572 $962 BRISTOL INDUSTRIES 9,0225 3,780 5,043 $2,553 $721 $931 $4,204 $2,855 $881 $1,161 $4,896 $692 BURLINGTON ENGINEERING INC. 1.2675 5,905 850 $359 $1.126 $157 $1,641 $401 $1,376 $198 $1,972 $331 BURROWS IND.DBA MINUTEMAN PUMPING 5.8124 23,449 8,681 $1.644 $4,471 $1,602 $7,717 $1.839 $5.464 $1,998 $9,300 $1,583 CADILLAC PLATING 2.0139 817 592 $570 $156 $109 $835 $637 $190 $136 $964 $129 CAL-AURUM INDUSTRIES INC. 22.6959 1,160 3,560 $6,421 $221 $657 $7,299 $7,181 $270 $819 $8,270 $971 CALIF CONSOLIDATED WATER PURIFICATION 15.2512 809 80,498 $4,315 $154 $14,856 $19,325 $4,825 $188 $18,526 $23,539 $4,214 CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES,INC. 2.1650 780 2,340 $613 $149 $432 $1,193 $685 $182 $538 $1,405 $212 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT FULLERTON 85.3916 71,217 53,412 $24,159 $13,577 $9,857 $47,594 $27,016 $16,593 $12,292 $55,902 $8,308 CAL-TRONICS CIRCUIT INC.-SANTA ANA 2.0917 2,301 274 $592 $439 $51 $1,081 $662 $536 $63 $1,261 $180 GAexcel.dta%fin121Mstreedlold d copy\STRATPLNr2003-04 permit users forAR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 3 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase CAMBRO MANUFACTURING 3.9216 4,472 4.472 $1,109 $853 $825 $2,788 $1,241 $1.042 $1,029 $3,312 $525 CANNON EQUIPMENT WEST INC. 1.8547 1,863 1,986 $525 $355 $367 $1,247 $587 $434 $457 $1,478 $232 CAPRO OIL COMPANY 1.7514 0 0 $496 $0 $0 $496 $554 $0 $0 $554 $59 CARGILL INC. 4.4876 16.298 6.427 $1,270 $3.107 $1,186 $5,563 $1,420 $3,797 $1,479 $6.696 $1,133 CARTEL ELECTRONICS 2.4280 1.486 746 $687 $283 $138 $1,108 $768 $346 $172 $1.286 $178 CASE SWAYNE,INC. 9.1525 40.506 5,722 $2,589 $7,722 $1,056 $11,368 $2,896 $9,438 $1,317 $13,650 $2,283 CATALINA CYLINDERS A DIV.OF APP 7.1849 3.961 5.132 $2.033 $755 $947 $3,735 $2,273 $923 $1,181 $4.377 $642 CEMPI INDUSTRIES INC. 0.3092 560 560 $87 $107 $103 $298 $98 $131 $129 $357 $60 CENTRAL POWDER COATING 0.4486 295 232 $127 $56 $43 $226 $142 $69 $53 $264 $38 CENTURY CIRCUIT SERVICES 4.1890 679 1,608 $1.185 $129 $297 $1,611 $1,325 $158 $370 $1,854 $242 CENTURY LAMINATORS INC. 20.7897 4.924 4.432 $5,882 $939 $818 $7.639 $6,577 $1.147 $1,020 $8.745 $1,106 CERADYNE INC.(MACHINE SHOP) 1.3397 5,178 2.438 $379 $987 $450 $1,816 $424 $1,207 $561 $2.191 $375 CEROMET INC. 0.5332 1,112 1,112 $151 $212 $205 $568 $169 $259 $256 $684 $116 CHAPMAN MEDICAL CENTER 2.7375 5,708 5,708 $774 $1,088 $1.053 $2.916 $866 $1.330 $1,314 $3.510 $594 CHEEK ENGINEERING 8 STAMPING 0.7028 879 298 $199 $168 $55 $421 $222 $205 $69 $496 $74 CHROMA SYSTEMS PARTNERS 178.5378 172,246 55.207 $50,512 $32,839 $10.188 $93.539 $56,486 $40.133 $12,705 $109,324 $15.785 CHROME TECHNOLOGY,INC. 3.7358 915 2,125 $1,057 $174 $392 $1,623 $1,182 $213 $489 $1,884 $261 CIRCUIT ACCESS 0.0406 85 85 $11 $16 $16 $43 $13 $20 $19 $52 $9 CIRCUIT CENTER 0.1065 6 6 $30 $1 $1 $32 $34 $1 $1 $36 $4 CIRCUIT TECH INC. 0.7505 457 437 $212 $87 $81 $380 $237 $107 $100 $444 $64 CIRTECH INC. 6.6467 6,459 6,610 $1,880 $1,231 $1,220 $4,332 $2,103 $1,505 $1,521 $5,129 $797 CITY OF ANAHEIM-WATER SERVICES 7.6110 95 163,891 $2,153 $18 $30,246 $32,417 $2,408 $22 $37.718 $40,148 $7,730 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMEN 2.3159 1,217 946 $655 $232 $175 $1,062 $733 $284 $218 $1,234 $172 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 2.2632 14 14 $640 $3 $3 $645 $716 $3 $3 $722 $77 CITY OF TUSTIN-MAINTENANCE YARD 0.0211 44 44 $6 $8 $8 $22 $7 $10 $10 $27 $5 CITY OF TUSTIN WATER SERVICE(17TH ST.) 120.5313 4,077 27.192 $34,101 $777 $5,018 $39,896 $38.134 $950 $6,258 $45.342 $5,445 CITY OF TUSTIN,WATER SERVICE(MAIN ST.) 5.5262 19 433 $1,563 $4 $80 $1,647 $1,748 $4 $100 $1.852 $205 CLASSIC PLATING INC. 3.2568 777 649 $921 $148 $120 $1,189 $1.030 $181 $149 $1,361 $171 CLEUGH'S RHUBARB COMPANY 5.6441 90.268 6,329 $1.597 $17,210 $1,168 $19.974 $1,786 $21,032 $1,457 $24,275 $4.300 COASTLINE METAL FINISHING CORP. 6.6595 1,174 2.112 $1,884 $224 $390 $2,498 $2.107 $274 $486 $2,866 $369 COIN LAUNDRY C/O FRANZ LIEM 0.1505 0 0 $43 $0 $0 $43 $48 $0 $0 $48 $5 COLUMBIA HUNTINGTON BEACH HOSPITAL 4.3800 9,132 9.132 $1,239 $1.741 $1,685 $4,666 $1.386 $2.128 $2.102 $5,615 $950 COLUMBINE ASSOCIATES 0.2837 0 0 $80 $0 $0 $80 $90 $0 $0 $90 $9 CONEXANT SYSTEMS,INC. 610.1060 15,015 50,212 $172,611 $2,863 $9,267 $184,740 $193.025 $3,498 $11,556 $208.080 $23.339 CONTINUOUS COATING CORPORATION 15.0683 1,135 3,558 $4,263 $216 $657 $5,136 $4,767 $264 $819 $5.851 $714 COOPER AND BRAIN INC. 16.5687 1,658 4,560 $4.688 $316 $842 $5,845 $5,242 $386 $1.049 $6,678 $833 COPPER CLAD MULTILAYER PRODUCTS INC. 17.8300 8,522 2,268 $5.044 $1,625 $418 $7.088 $5,641 $1,986 $522 $8,149 $1,061 COSMOTRONIC CORPORATION 4.8467 11,512 2,791 $1.371 $2.195 $515 $4,081 $1.533 $2.682 $642 $4,858 $777 CRAZY SHIRTS INC. 0.8125 1,694 1,694 $230 $323 $313 $865 $257 $395 $390 $1,042 $176 CREST COATING INC. 3.0720 8,755 3,780 $869 $1,669 $698 $3,236 $972 $2,040 $870 $3,882 $646 CRITERION MACHINE WORKS 0.4363 573 573 $123 $109 $106 $339 $138 $134 $132 $404 $65 CROCKETT CONTAINER CORP. 0.6175 1.287 1,287 $175 $245 $238 $658 $195 $300 $296 $792 $134 G:\excel.dta\fin\210\streed\ald d copy\STRATPLN\2003-04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 4 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Properly Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs lbs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 21.3383 272 8,086 $6,037 $52 $1.492 $7,581 $6,751 $63 $1,861 $8,675 $1,094 CUSTOM ENAMELERS INC. 1.1852 790 1,037 $335 $151 $191 $677 $375 $184 $239 $798 $120 CYTEC FIBERITE INC.-MIX HOUSE 1.2172 2.372 2.380 $344 $452 $439 $1,236 $385 $553 $548 $1,486 $250 D S S CUSTOM PLATING INC. 0.3964 271 375 $112 $52 $69 $233 $125 $63 $86 $275 $42 DAE SHIN USA,INC. 0.4500 938 938 $127 $179 $173 $479 $142 $219 $216 $577 $98 DANONE WATERS OF N.A.-ANAHEIM 0.2656 554 554 $75 $106 $102 $283 $84 $129 $127 $341 $58 DANONE WATERS OF N.A.-SANTA ANA 0.6250 1,303 1,303 $177 $248 $240 $666 $198 $304 $300 $801 $136 DATA AIRE INC.#2 0.3250 678 678 $92 $129 $125 $346 $103 $158 $156 $417 $70 DATA ELECTRONIC SERVICES INC. 3.9182 6,992 622 $1,109 $1,333 $115 $2,556 $1,240 $1,629 $143 $3,012 $456 DATA SOLDER SERVICES 1,2748 1,377 136 $361 $263 $25 $648 $403 $321 $31 $755 $107 DEAN FOODS CO.OF CALIF.INC(MILK PLANT) 33.3400 454,086 160,163 $9,433 $86,572 $29,558 $125,562 $10.548 $105,802 $36,860 $153,210 $27,648 DEAN FOODS CO.OF CALIF.INC.(ICE CREAM) 12.3877 223,995 87,388 $3,505 $42,705 $16,127 $62,337 $3,919 $52.191 $20,111 $76,222 $13,885 DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS 12.4876 4,691 4,862 $3,533 $894 $897 $5,325 $3,951 $1.093 $1,119 $6,163 $838 DERM COSMETICS LAB'S INC. 0.3472 9,684 8,185 $98 $1,846 $1,510 $3,455 $110 $2,256 $1,884 $4,250 $795 DETAILS INC#3,DBA DYNAMIC DETAILS INC. 10.5543 465 465 $2,986 $89 $86 $3,160 $3,339 $108 $107 $3,554 $394 DISNEYLAND RESORT 450.4191 939,124 939,124 $127,433 $179,044 $173,315 $479,792 $142,504 $218,816 $216,130 $577,449 $97,658 DITTY DRUM COMPANY,INC. 1.5734 225 911 $445 $43 $168 $656 $498 $52 $210 $760 $104 DON MIGUEL MEXICAN FOODS INC. 9.7970 65.583 17,482 $2,772 $12.503 $3,226 $18,501 $3,100 $15,281 $4,023 $22.404 $3.902 DONG PHUONG TOFU 0.5346 9,865 937 $151 $1.881 $173 $2,205 $169 $2,299 $216 $2,683 $478 DUCOMMUNAEROSTRUCTURES 8.0778 7.665 4,626 $2,285 $1,461 $054 $4,601 $2.556 $1,786 $1,065 $5.406 $806 DUNHAM METAL PROCESSING 0.9162 762 1,983 $259 $145 $366 $770 $290 $177 $456 $924 $153 DYE TECHNIQUE INC. 10.4011 8,415 4,648 $2,943 $1,604 $858 $5,405 $3,291 $1,961 $1,070 $6,321 $916 DYNAMIC DETAILS INC. 16.3837 23,383 12,606 $4,635 $4.458 $2,326 $11,420 $5.183 $5,448 $2,901 $13,533 $2,113 E F T FAST QUALITY SERVICE,INC. 0.3956 257 65 $112 $49 $12 $173 $125 $60 $15 $200 $27 EATON CORPORATION 3.0841 2,775 6,901 $873 $529 $1,274 $2,675 $976 $647 $1,588 $3,211 $535 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC. 1.3798 2,820 2,228 $390 $538 $411 $1,339 $437 $657 $513 $1,606 $267 EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC 0.0212 39 39 $6 $7 $7 $21 $7 $9 $9 $25 $4 EL METATE FOODS,INC. 4.4657 145,216 211.933 $1,263 $27,685 $39.112 $68,061 $1,413 $33,835 $48,774 $84,022 $15,961 EL TORO MEAT SHOP 4.0017 73,560 33,662 $1,132 $14,024 $6,212 $21.369 $1.266 $17,139 $7,747 $26,152 $4.784 ELECTRO METAL FINISHING CORPORATION 0.1652 327 303 $47 $62 $56 $165 $52 $76 $70 $198 $33 ELECTROLURGY INC. 11.6743 1,152 7.923 $3,303 $220 $1,462 $4,985 $3,694 $268 $1,823 $5,785 $801 ELECTRON PLATING III INC. 0.9713 210 566 $275 $40 $104 $419 $307 $49 $130 $487 $67 ELECTRONIC PRECISION SPECIALTIES INC. 12.7574 1.003 4,177 $3,609 $191 $771 $4,571 $4,036 $234 $961 $5,231 $660 ELECTRORACK PRODUCTS CO.INC. 0.5685 1,288 1.161 $161 $245 $214 $621 $180 $300 $267 $747 $126 ELECTROSERVICES 2000INC. 2.9695 887 163 $840 $169 $30 $1,039 $939 $207 $38 $1.184 $144 EMBEE INC.#1 14.5871 835 835 $4,127 $159 $154 $4,440 $4,615 $195 $192 $5,002 $561 EMBEE INC.#2 23.0950 1,118 2,247 $6,534 $213 $415 $7,162 $7.307 $261 $517 $8,084 $923 EMBEE INC.93 10.0162 1,810 1,012 $2,834 $345 $187 $3,365 $3,169 $422 $233 $3,823 $458 ENGINEERING PLATING CORPORATION 0.3333 8 a $94 $1 $1 $97 $105 $2 $2 $109 $12 ENGRAVERS INK CO 0.0554 32 65 $16 $6 $12 $34 $18 $7 $15 $40 $6 ENTHONE INC. 3.7599 41,749 24,184 $1,064 $7,959 $4,463 $13,486 $1,190 $9,727 $5,566 $16,483 $2,996 ESSEX GROUP INC. 1,6026 1.888 1,957 $453 $360 $361 $1,175 $507 $440 $450 $1,397 $223 GAexcel.dtaV1n12101streed\old d copylSTRATPLW2003-04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 5 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Properly Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003.04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase EXCELLO CIRCUITS MANUFACTURING CORP. 3.9787 1,684 465 $1,126 $321 $86 $1,533 $1,259 $392 $107 $1,758 $226 EXPO DYEING AND FINISHING INC. 102.0456 203,487 41,549 $28,871 $38,795 $7.668 $75,333 $32,285 $47,413 $9,562 $89,260 $13,926 EXQUISITE DESIGNS INC. 0.3086 27 27 $87 $5 $5 $97 $98 $6 $6 $110 $13 F M H INVESTORS GROUP 1.2105 1,101 1,039 $342 $210 $192 $744 $383 $257 $239 $879 $135 FABRICATION CONCEPTS CORPORATION 6.2408 8,666 7,193 $1.766 $1,652 $1,328 $4,745 $1,974 $2,019 $1,655 $5,649 $904 FAIRCHILD FASTENERS 8.1900 17.076 17,076 $2,317 $3,256 $3,151 $8,724 $2.591 $3.979 $3,930 $10.500 $1,776 FAIRVIEW STATE HOSPITAL 44.5279 126,635 98,782 $12,598 $24,143 $18,230 $54,971 $14.088 $29,506 $22,734 $66,327 $11.356 FINELINE CIRCUITS&TECHNOLOGY INC. 0.8123 1,438 334 $230 $274 $62 $565 $257 $335 $77 $669 $103 FOAMEX L.P. 1.1950 2,384 2,394 $338 $455 $442 $1,234 $378 $555 $551 $1,484 $250 FROZSUN FOODS,INC. 2.5021 16,095 6,209 $708 $3,068 $1,146 $4,922 $792 $3,750 $1,429 $5,971 $1,048 FULLERTON CULTURED SPECIALTIES 26.8560 779,440 189.625 $7,598 $148,600 $34,995 $191,194 $8,497 $181,610 $43,640 $233,747 $42.553 FULLERTON FOODS-OSCAR MAYER FOODS COI 6.8181 9,160 9,160 $1,929 $1,746 $1,691 $5,366 $2.157 $2,134 $2,108 $6,400 $1,034 FULLERTON PLATING 8.5731 73 4.488 $2,426 $14 $828 $3,268 $2.712 $17 $1,033 $3,762 $495 FUTURE TECHNOLOGY 5.6915 2,420 4,677 $1,610 $461 $863 $2,935 $1,801 $564 $1,076 $3,441 $506 GALLADE CHEMICAL INC. 1.3717 299 1,013 $388 $57 $187 $632 $434 $70 $233 $737 $105 GARDNER LITHOGRAPH,INC. 1.3430 685 685 $380 $131 $126 $637 $425 $159 $158 $742 $105 GARG-OIL PRODUCTION LLC 3.5859 0 0 $1,015 $0 $0 $1.015 $1,135 $0 $0 $1,135 $120 GEMINI INDUSTRIES INC. 5.2064 3,294 97.527 $1,473 $628 $17,999 $20.100 $1,647 $768 $22,445 $24,860 $4,760 GENERAL CONTAINER CORPORATION 0.4397 829 739 $124 $158 $136 $419 $139 $193 $170 $502 $84 GENERAL ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL INC. 0.8276 628 628 $234 $120 $116 $470 $262 $146 $144 $553 $83 GEORGE A.JONES,IMPERIAL#2 WELL 1.5136 341 555 $428 $65 $103 $596 $479 $79 $128 $686 $90 GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION 7.0132 145,786 4,139 $1,984 $27,794 $764 $30,542 $2,219 $33.968 $952 $37,140 $6,597 GERARD TILE 3,3057 4,108 45,503 $935 $783 $8,398 $10,116 $1,046 $957 $10,472 $12,475 $2,359 GOGLANIAN BAKERIES 6.5012 42,955 33,546 $1,839 $8,189 $6,191 $16,220 $2,057 $10,008 $7,720 $19.786 $3.566 GOLDENWEST LAUNDRY&VALET SERVICES INC 4.7161 489 489 $1.334 $93 $90 $1,518 $1.492 $114 $112 $1,718 $201 GOMTECH ELECTRONICS 0,0163 34 34 $5 $6 $6 $17 $5 $8 $8 $21 $4 GOODWIN COMPANY 8.1710 90,626 13,532 $2.312 $17,278 $2.497 $22,087 $2,585 $21.116 $3,114 $26.315 $4,728 GRANDE TORTILLA INC. 2.1065 44,602 19,111 $596 $8,503 $3,527 $12,626 $666 $10.392 $4,398 $15,457 $2,831 GRANT PISTON RINGS DIV.OF FRON 0.6018 1,249 1,246 $170 $238 $230 $638 $190 $291 $287 $768 $130 GRAPHIC PACKAGING CORP. 0.9828 2,047 2,048 $278 $390 $378 $1,046 $311 $477 $471 $1,259 $213 GUNTHER ATHLETIC SERVICE 1.7949 1.317 1,329 $508 $251 $245 $1,004 $568 $307 $306 $1,181 $176 H.KOCH&SONS COMPANY 1.4306 587 587 $405 $112 $108 $625 $453 $137 $135 $724 $99 H.B.OIL OPERATIONS TRUST 0.8317 874 555 $235 $167 $102 $504 $263 $204 $128 $594 $90 HAMILTON MATERIALS 1.6075 2,923 5.535 $455 $557 $1,021 $2,034 $509 $681 $1,274 $2,464 $430 HANSON-LORAN CO.,INC. 0.0260 54 54 $7 $10 $10 $28 $8 $13 $12 $33 $6 HARBOR TRUCK BODIES INC. 0.7093 1,375 1,286 $201 $262 $237 $700 $224 $320 $296 $841 $141 HARTE-HANKS SHOPPERS 7.2631 29,797 9.312 $2,055 $5,681 $1,718 $9,454 $2.298 $6.943 $2,143 $11,383 $1,929 HARTWELL CORPORATION 2.3366 4,067 3.269 $661 $775 $603 $2,040 $739 $948 $752 $2,439 $399 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 3.4274 21,353 4,577 $970 $4,071 $845 $5,885 $1.084 $4,975 $1,053 $7,113 $1,228 HEALTH CARE APPAREL SERVICES 15.5639 33.355 21.860 $4,403 $6,359 $4,034 $14,797 $4,924 $7.772 $5,031 $17,727 $2,930 HIGH TECH COATINGS,INC.SF 0.3259 966 346 $92 $184 $64 $340 $103 $225 $80 $408 $68 HIGH-TECH COATINGS,INC. 0.2154 484 189 $61 $92 $35 $188 $68 $113 $44 $225 $36 GAoxcel.dIMfin12101streedlold d copyiSTRATPLN12003-04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 6 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003.04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase HIGHTOWER PLATING&MANUFACTURING CO. 2,6995 117 1,462 $764 $22 $270 $1,056 $854 $27 $336 $1,218 $162 HI-TECH STENCILS 0.0278 50 51 $8 $10 $9 $27 $9 $12 $12 $32 $5 HIXSON METAL FINISHING 16.4457 1.032 2.894 $4,653 $197 $534 $5,384 $5,203 $240 $666 $6,110 $726 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 18.2500 38,051 38,051 $5,163 $7,254 $7,022 $19,440 $5,774 $8,866 $8,757 $23,397 $3,957 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 0.1994 416 416 $56 $79 $77 $212 $63 $97 $96 $256 $43 HOANG CLEANERS 0.6147 0 0 $174 $0 $0 $174 $194 $0 $0 $194 $21 HOUSE FOODS AMERICA CORPORATION 64.3995 831,855 299,406 $18,220 $158,593 $55.255 $232,068 $20,375 $193,822 $68,905 $283,102 $51,034 HUNTINGTON GARDENS CENTER 0.1840 0 0 $52 $0 $0 $52 $58 $0 $0 $58 $6 HYATT DIE CASTING&ENGINEERING CORP. 2.3278 7,857 2,164 $659 $1,498 $399 $2,556 $736 $1,831 $498 $3,065 $509 1 C N BIOMEDICALS,INC. 2.3262 407 407 $658 $78 $75 $811 $736 $95 $94 $924 $114 1 C N PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 8.1930 5,082 5,082 $2,318 $969 $938 $4,225 $2,592 $1,184 $1,170 $4,946 $721 1 P C CAL FLEX INC. 0.2756 575 575 $78 $110 $106 $294 $87 $134 $132 $353 $60 1 T T JABSCO PRODUCTS 0.7813 1,629 1,629 $221 $311 $301 $832 $247 $380 $375 $1,002 $169 IDEAL ANODIZING INC. 6.7268 1,163 21,247 $1,903 $222 $3,921 $6,046 $2.128 $271 $4,890 $7.289 $1.243 IDEAL UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE 7.7102 17.632 12,092 $2,181 $3,361 $2,232 $7.775 $2.439 $4.108 $2,783 $9.331 $1,556 IMPERIAL CONTAINERS&DISPLAY INC. 0.3601 707 934 $102 $135 $172 $409 $114 $165 $215 $494 $85 IMPERIAL PLATING 0.6530 12 61 $185 $2 $11 $198 $207 $3 $14 $223 $25 INDEPENDENT FORGE 0.3000 626 626 $85 $119 $115 $320 $95 $146 $144 $385 $65 INTEC PRODUCTS INC. 5.6341 319 8,547 $1,594 $61 $1,577 $3,232 $1,783 $74 $1,967 $3.824 $592 INTEGRATED AEROSPACE,INC. 4.0871 3,401 3,401 $1.156 $648 $628 $2,432 $1,293 $792 $783 $2,868 $436 INTERCEM CORPORATION 1.0544 3,797 1,801 $298 $724 $332 $1,355 $334 $885 $414 $1.633 $278 IRVINE SENSORS CORP. 0.2822 263 263 $80 $50 $48 $178 $89 $61 $60 $211 $33 ITT CANNON,A DIVISION OF ITT INDUSTRIES 63.6795 17,771 14,417 $18.016 $3.388 $2.661 $24,065 $20,147 $4,141 $3,318 $27,605 $3.541 J&H DEBURRING INC.92 0.1690 352 352 $48 $67 $65 $180 $53 $82 $81 $217 $37 J K L MANUFACTURING INC.#2 0.1404 143 37 $40 $27 $7 $74 $44 $33 $8 $86 $12 J.R.&D INC. 2.3661 10,869 8,604 $669 $2,072 $1.588 $4.329 $749 $2,532 $1,980 $5.261 $932 JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION(U.S.) 8.3453 34,769 8,161 $2,361 $6,629 $1,506 $10,496 $2,640 $8.101 $1.878 $12,620 $2,124 JELLCO CONTAINER INC. 0.4160 867 867 $118 $165 $160 $443 $132 $202 $200 $533 $90 JOHN A.THOMAS 19,3814 155,499 11,477 $5,483 $29,646 $2,118 $37,247 $6,132 $36,231 $2.641 $45,004 $7,757 JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY INC. 12.0868 4,215 4,562 $3,420 $804 $842 $5,065 $3,824 $982 $1,050 $5,856 $791 JOINT FORCES TRAINING BASE,LOS ALAMITOS 37.5063 31,618 35,754 $10,611 $6,028 $6.598 $23,238 $11.866 $7,367 $8,228 $27,462 $4,224 JONATHAN MANUFACTURING CORP. 3.5390 10,291 5,000 $1,001 $1,962 $923 $3,886 $1,120 $2,398 $1,151 $4,668 $782 J-TRON INC. 0.2781 628 198 $79 $120 $37 $235 $88 $146 $46 $280 $45 K C A ELECTRONICS INC. 49.2322 15.815 13,489 $13.929 $3,015 $2,489 $19.433 $15.576 $3,685 $3,104 $22,366 $2,932 K C A ELECTRONICS,INC. 0.1560 325 325 $44 $62 $60 $166 $49 $76 $75 $200 $34 K J ENTERPRISES,LLC 0.0180 0 0 $5 $0 $0 $5 $6 $0 $0 $6 $1 K SOLDERING,INC.DBA QUALITY SOLDERING 0.4067 139 113 $115 $26 $21 $162 $129 $32 $26 $187 $25 K U A TEXTILES INC. 11.6955 40,602 66.074 $3,309 $7,741 $12,194 $23,244 $3,700 $9,460 $15,206 $28,367 $5,123 KENLEN SPECIALITIES INC. 0.5690 410 420 $161 $78 $77 $317 $180 $96 $97 $372 $56 KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE,INC. 414.1119 185,738 391,097 $117,161 $35.411 $72.177 $224,749 $131,017 $43,277 $90,007 $264,301 $39,552 KINSBURSKY BROTHERS SUPPLY INC. 0.9982 948 1,032 $282 $181 $191 $654 $316 $221 $238 $774 $121 KIRKHILL RUBBER CO(SOUTH) 4.7765 9.490 9,380 $1.351 $1,809 $1,731 $4.892 $1,511 $2,211 $2,159 $5,881 $989 G:lexcel.dta\f1n121Mstreedlotd d copy\STRATPLN12003.04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 7 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase KNOTT'S BERRY FARM FOODS 17.7805 968,676 52,128 $5,030 $184,678 $9,620 $199,329 $5,625 $225,701 $11,997 $243,324 $43.995 KODAK PROCESSING LABS 0.8625 1,798 1,798 $244 $343 $332 $919 $273 $419 $414 $1,106 $187 KRYLER CORPORATION 3.2167 338 338 $910 $64 $62 $1,037 $1,018 $79 $78 $1,174 $137 L&N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO.INC.(WAREHOUSE) 5.4639 5.539 3,693 $1.546 $1,056 $681 $3,283 $1,729 $1.291 $850 $3.869 $586 L&N UNIFORM SUPPLY COMPANY,INC.(CLEAN) 1.0595 3,053 3.736 $300 $582 $690 $1.571 $335 $711 $860 $1,906 $335 LA HABRA PLATING CO.INC. 1.8453 81 81 $522 $16 $15 $553 $584 $19 $19 $621 $69 LA PALMA INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL 14.8976 31,061 31,061 $4,215 $5,922 $5,732 $15.869 $4,713 $7,237 $7,148 $19,099 $3,230 LACEY CUSTOM LINENS 1.0565 952 426 $299 $181 $79 $559 $334 $222 $98 $654 $95 LAM LIGHTING INC. 0.6796 1,254 1.214 $192 $239 $224 $655 $215 $292 $279 $786 $131 LAM-PLATE TECH INC. 0.1378 53 53 $39 $10 $10 $59 $44 $12 $12 $68 $9 LEACH INTERNATIONAL 2.4050 707 1.860 $680 $135 $343 $1,158 $761 $165 $428 $1,354 $195 LINCO INDUSTRIES INC. 0.9672 93 2,803 $274 $18 $517 $809 $306 $22 $645 $973 $164 LINDBERG HEAT TREATING CO.-ALUMATHERM 0.7524 1,425 1,408 $213 $272 $260 $744 $238 $332 $324 $894 $150 LINFINITY MICROELECTRONICS INC. 19.5700 2,842 2,206 $5,537 $542 $407 $6,486 $6,192 $662 $508 $7,361 $876 LOGI GRAPHICS,INC. 0.6583 295 179 $186 $56 $33 $275 $208 $69 $41 $316 $43 LOS ALAMITOS ECONO-WASH 2.0842 0 0 $590 $0 $0 $590 $659 $0 $0 $659 $70 LOS ALAMITOS GENERAL HOSPITAL 6.8438 14,269 14.269 $1.936 $2,720 $2,633 $7,290 $2.165 $3,325 $3.284 $8.774 $1.484 LOS ANGELES TIMES COMMUNICATIONS LLC 10.4097 91,451 10.557 $2,945 $17,435 $1,948 $22,329 $3,293 $21,308 $2,430 $27.031 $4,703 M C P FOODS INC. 21.3997 1,369.649 25,316 $6.054 $261.124 $4.672 $271,850 $6,770 $319.128 $5,826 $331,725 $59.875 M T S MICROELECTRONICS INC. 0.0855 178 178 $24 $34 $33 $91 $27 $42 $41 $110 $19 M.S.BELLOWS 0.1895 531 265 $54 $101 $49 $204 $60 $124 $61 $245 $41 MAGNETIC METALS CORPORATION 1.5807 5,849 1,451 $447 $1,115 $268 $1.830 $500 $1,363 $334 $2,197 $367 MARCEL ELECTRONICS INT. 24.5656 5,942 3,427 $6,950 $1,133 $632 $8,715 $7,772 $1,384 $789 $9,945 $1,230 MARGARETIS TEXTILE SERVICE 22.3527 22,580 37.986 $6,324 $4.305 $7.010 $17,639 $7,072 $5,261 $6,742 $21,075 $3,436 MARK OPTICS INC. 0.3432 435 1.139 $97 $83 $210 $390 $109 $101 $262 $472 $62 MARKLAND MANUFACTURING,INC. 5.2878 2,520 2,520 $1,496 $480 $465 $2.442 $1,673 $587 $580 $2,840 $399 MARUCHAN,INC. 14.1720 155,496 27,279 $4.010 $29.645 $5,034 $38,689 $4.484 $36.231 $6,278 $46.992 $8,303 MASK TECHNOLOGY INC. 1.6123 3,287 2.296 $456 $627 $424 $1,507 $510 $766 $528 $1,804 $298 MCCURDY CIRCUITS,INC. 14.4135 12,858 16.519 $4,078 $2.451 $3,049 $9,578 $4,560 $2,996 $3,802 $11,358 $1,780 MEAD PACKAGING 2.1577 8.319 4,729 $610 $1,586 $873 $3.069 $683 $1,938 $1,088 $3,709 $640 MEDEVA PHARMACEUTICALS CA,INC. 1.0737 864 606 $304 $165 $112 $580 $340 $201 $140 $681 $100 MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES,INC. 3.7900 8.396 7.692 $1.072 $1,601 $1.420 $4,093 $1,199 $1.956 $1,770 $4,926 $833 MICRO SEMI CORP. 32.1131 17,195 14,538 $9,085 $3,278 $2,683 $15,047 $10,160 $4.006 $3,346 $17,512 $2,465 MICROMETALS INC.#2 7.6480 69,632 4,779 $2.164 $13.275 $882 $16,321 $2.420 $16.224 $1,100 $19,744 $3,423 MILBANK WEST INC. 1.8327 2,525 2,321 $519 $481 $428 $1,428 $580 $588 $534 $1,702 $274 MILLETT INDUSTRIES 0.9839 1,643 616 $278 $313 $114 $705 $311 $383 $142 $836 $131 MONARCH PRECISION DEBURRING COMPANY 1.4173 217 217 $401 $41 $40 $482 $448 $51 $50 $549 $66 MONOGRAM SYSTEMS 5.7550 5,841 6.407 $1,628 $1,114 $1,182 $3,924 $1,821 $1.361 $1,475 $4,656 $732 MORAVEK BIOCHEMICALS INC. 0.3247 196 196 $92 $37 $36 $165 $103 $46 $45 $193 $28 MORTON INTERNATIONAL 3.5609 1.965 2.118 $1,007 $375 $391 $1,773 $1,127 $458 $487 $2.072 $299 MULTI-FINELINE ELECTRONIX INC. 20.3149 24,556 21,665 $5,747 $4.682 $3,998 $14,427 $6,427 $5,722 $4,986 $17,135 $2.707 MUNOZ COIN LAUNDRY 0.1375 0 0 $39 $0 $0 $39 $44 $0 $0 $44 $5 G:\excel.dta\fin\2101streed\old d copy\STRATPLN\2003-04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 8 of 12 20OD-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I d K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase MURRIETTA CIRCUITS INC. 3.2471 1,701 3,156 $919 $324 $582 $1,825 $1,027 $396 $726 $2,150 $325 NELCO PRODUCTS,INC. 14.7821 5,459 5,459 $4,182 $1,041 $1,007 $6,230 $4,677 $1,272 $1,256 $7,205 $975 NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY 2.7022 2,002 818 $765 $382 $151 $1,297 $855 $466 $188 $1,510 $213 NEWPORT CORPORATION 5.5577 4,767 3.988 $1,572 $909 $736 $3,217 $1,758 $1,111 $918 $3,787 $570 NEWPORT METAL FINISHING INC. 1.2127 1,063 1,134 $343 $203 $209 $755 $384 $248 $261 $892 $137 NEWPORT PRECISION OPTICS CORP. 0.7966 996 1,054 $225 $190 $194 $610 $252 $232 $243 $727 $117 NOLLAC OIL COMPANY 1.7580 88 279 $497 $17 $51 $566 $556 $20 $64 $641 $76 NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO.INC.(MAIN) 29.4730 882,895 100,178 $8,339 $168,324 $18,488 $195,150 $9,325 $205,714 $23,055 $238,094 $42.944 NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO.INC.(TETRA) 76.2985 864,612 83,355 $21,586 $164,838 $15.383 $201,808 $24,139 $201,455 $19,183 $244,777 $42,969 NUEVO ENERGY COMPANY(BREA) 0.1027 214 214 $29 $41 $40 $109 $32 $50 $49 $132 $22 NUEVO ENERGY COMPANY(H.S.) 0.2864 284 302 $81 $54 $56 $191 $91 $66 $70 $226 $35 NU-TEC POWDER COATING 0.0780 163 163 $22 $31 $30 $83 $25 $38 $37 $100 $17 O C B REPROGRAPHICS 1.6250 3.388 3.388 $460 $646 $625 $1,731 $514 $789 $780 $2,083 $352 O'DONNELL OIL COMPANY 0.4631 0 0 $131 $0 $0 $131 $147 $0 $0 $147 $15 OLIVE OIL CO. 0.1207 76 76 $34 $15 $14 $63 $38 $18 $18 $73 $11 OLYMPIC POWDER COATINGS INC. 1.5126 945 915 $428 $180 $169 $777 $479 $220 $211 $909 $132 OMNI METAL FINISHING,INC. 6.6953 1.206 1,838 $1,894 $230 $339 $2,463 $2,118 $281 $423 $2,822 $359 ORANGE CONTAINER,INC. 0.7307 1,246 1,946 $207 $238 $359 $803 $231 $290 $448 $969 $166 ORANGE COUNTY METAL PROCESSING 20.5521 596 76.655 $5,815 $114 $14.147 $20,075 $6,502 $139 $17,641 $24,283 $4,208 ORANGE COUNTY PLATING CO.,INC. 4.2196 1,235 1,710 $1,194 $235 $316 $1,745 $1,335 $288 $393 $2,016 $271 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 14.9712 56,755 30,986 $4,236 $10,820 $5,718 $20,775 $4,737 $13,224 $7,131 $25,092 $4,317 ORANGE RESOURCE RECOVERY SYSTEMS 0.4718 6,060 2,487 $133 $1,155 $459 $1,748 $149 $1,412 $572 $2,133 $386 P C A METAL FINISHING,INC. 4.9676 2,166 2,304 $1,405 $413 $425 $2,244 $1,572 $505 $530 $2,607 $363 P C E INDUSTRY,INC. 1.0332 613 2,109 $292 $117 $389 $798 $327 $143 $485 $955 $157 P T C INDUSTRIES,INC. 0.4004 642 444 $113 $122 $82 $318 $127 $150 $102 $379 $61 PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY,INC. 0.0703 93 93 $20 $18 $17 $55 $22 $22 $21 $65 $11 PACIFIC QUARTZ,INC. 1.6697 2,225 5,662 $472 $424 $1,045 $1,941 $528 $518 $1.303 $2,350 $408 PACIFIC UTILITY PRODUCTS INC. 0.6225 358 354 $176 $68 $65 $310 $197 $83 $81 $362 $52 PACKARD-HUGHES INTERCONNECT SYSTEMS 31.6408 10,711 6,746 $8,952 $2,042 $1,245 $12,239 $10,011 $2,496 $1.553 $14,059 $1,820 PANEL CONCEPTS INC. 4.5220 2,607 3,586 $1,279 $497 $662 $2.438 $1,431 $607 $825 $2,863 $425 PAYTON TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.8051 1.564 1,568 $228 $298 $289 $815 $255 $364 $361 $980 $165 PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING GROUP 27.7684 313,390 52,055 $7.856 $59,748 $9,607 $77,211 $8,785 $73,020 $11,980 $93,785 $16,574 PERFORMANCE POWDER,INC. 0.8223 519 415 $233 $99 $77 $408 $260 $121 $96 $477 $68 PETROPRIZE 0.1966 0 0 $56 $0 $0 $56 $62 $0 $0 $62 $7 PICOFARAD INC. 0.9541 1,047 1.657 $270 $200 $306 $775 $302 $244 $381 $927 $152 PIER OIL COMPANY 0,6124 0 0 $173 $0 $0 $173 $194 $0 $0 $194 $20 PILKINGTON AEROSPACE 6.9638 6,035 76,149 $1.970 $1,151 $14,053 $17,174 $2,203 $1,406 $17,525 $21,134 $3.960 PIONEER CIRCUITS 9.5534 4,795 3,238 $2,703 $914 $598 $4,215 $3,023 $1,117 $745 $4,885 $670 PLACENTIA LINDA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 9.5650 19.943 19,943 $2,706 $3,802 $3,680 $10,189 $3,026 $4,647 $4,590 $12,263 $2,074 PLATECORP#2,INC. 7.6584 2,534 2,948 $2.167 $483 $544 $3,194 $2,423 $590 $679 $3,692 $498 PLEGEL OIL COMPANY(BLATTNER-A.H.A.) 2.4323 203 223 $688 $39 $41 $768 $770 $47 $51 $868 $100 PLEION CORPORATION#2 3.5065 2,373 2,973 $992 $452 $549 $1,993 $1,109 $553 $684 $2,347 $353 G:\excel.dta%n\210\streed\old d ropy\STRATPLN\2003-04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 9 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I 1 K L Total Vol Chg BOO Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOO Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase POWDERCOAT SERVICES INC.#1 0.1462 279 280 $41 $53 $52 $146 $46 $65 $64 $176 $29 POWDERCOAT SERVICES INC.#2 0.1316 274 274 $37 $52 $51 $140 $42 $64 $63 $169 $29 POWDERCOAT SERVICES INC.#3 0.6253 214 270 $177 $41 $50 $267 $198 $50 $62 $310 $42 POWDERCOAT SERVICES INC.94 0.5310 299 458 $150 $57 $85 $292 $168 $70 $105 $343 $51 POWER CIRCUITS,INC. 32.4458 53.598 11.921 $9,180 $10.219 $2.200 $21,598 $10.265 $12,488 $2,744 $25,497 $3,699 PRECIOUS METALS PLATING 0.5944 160 190 $168 $30 $35 $234 $188 $37 $44 $269 $35 PRECISION ANODIZING AND PLATING INC. 24.7056 1,689 122,259 $6,990 $322 $22.563 $29,875 $7,816 $394 $28,137 $36,347 $6,472 PRECISION CIRCUITS WEST INC. 1.0045 248 248 $284 $47 $46 $377 $318 $58 $57 $433 $55 PRECISION PAINTING 0.8738 830 1,002 $247 $158 $185 $590 $276 $193 $231 $700 $110 PRECISION POWDERCOATING INC. 0.2503 569 226 $71 $109 $42 $221 $79 $133 $52 $264 $43 PRECISION RESOURCE,CALIFORNIA DIVISION 4.3735 7,575 4,238 $1,237 $1.444 $782 $3,464 $1,384 $1,765 $975 $4,124 $660 PRECON,INC. 0.3773 1,016 421 $107 $194 $78 $378 $119 $237 $97 $453 $75 PRIMATEX INDUSTRIES OF CA INC 15.8706 6.800 15,302 $4,490 $1,296 $2.824 $8,610 $5.021 $1,584 $3,522 $10,127 $1,517 PRIME TECHNOLOGIES,INC. 3.7436 2,769 984 $1,059 $528 $182 $1.769 $1,184 $645 $226 $2.056 $287 PRINTRONIX,INC. 2.8432 3,865 3,375 $804 $737 $623 $2,164 $900 $901 $777 $2,577 $413 PRO-TECH 2.8454 4,413 3,471 $805 $841 $641 $2,287 $900 $1,028 $799 $2,727 $440 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 6.2688 21,555 10,820 $1,774 $4,109 $1.997 $7,880 $1,983 $5,022 $2,490 $9.496 $1,616 PURE-CHEM PRODUCTS COMPANY INC. 0.0355 73 73 $10 $14 $14 $38 $11 $17 $17 $45 $8 QUALITY ALUMINUM FORGE 0.7280 1,361 1,391 $206 $259 $257 $722 $230 $317 $320 $866 $145 R B C TRANSPORT DYNAMICS CORP. 2.1675 2.958 4,021 $613 $564 $742 $1,919 $686 $689 $925 $2.300 $381 R T I ELECTRONICS,INC. 0.6777 1,410 1,409 $192 $269 $260 $721 $214 $328 $324 $867 $147 RAILMAKERS,INC. 0.0975 203 203 $28 $39 $38 $104 $31 $47 $47 $125 $21 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO.,INC. 1.4976 3,122 3.122 $424 $595 $576 $1,595 $474 $728 $719 $1,920 $325 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY(BAKERY) 1.7875 3,727 3.727 $506 $711 $688 $1,904 $566 $868 $858 $2,292 $388 RAYNE WATER SYSTEMS 3.8155 230 1,219 $1,079 $44 $225 $1,348 $1,207 $54 $281 $1,541 $193 REID METAL FINISHING 1.4669 1,381 547 $415 $263 $101 $779 $464 $322 $126 $912 $132 RENAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE,LLC 0.1170 244 244 $33 $47 $45 $125 $37 $57 $56 $150 $25 REVERE TRANSDUCERS,INC. 2.4990 3.405 2,648 $707 $649 $489 $1,845 $791 $793 $609 $2,193 $349 RICOH ELECTRONICS#2 3.5439 10,807 5,910 $1,003 $2.060 $1.091 $4,154 $1,121 $2,518 $1,360 $4,999 $846 RICOH ELECTRONICS INC. 32640 3,111 2,384 $923 $593 $440 $1,956 $1,033 $725 $549 $2,306 $350 RIGIFLEX TECHNOLOGY INC. 0.8303 352 265 $235 $67 $49 $351 $263 $82 $61 $406 $55 ROCK INDUSTRIES,INC. 0.4399 1,094 320 $124 $209 $59 $392 $139 $255 $74 $468 $76 ROTO-DIE COMPANY INC. 0.1941 203 203 $55 $39 $38 $131 $61 $47 $47 $156 $24 ROYALTY CARPET MILLS INC. 147.4230 446,773 60.378 $41,709 $85.177 $11,143 $138,029 $46.642 $104,098 $13,895 $164,635 $26,606 S&C OIL CORPORATION 0.0255 0 O $7 $0 $0 $7 $8 $0 $0 $8 $1 S&S POLISHING/PLATING 17.6328 564 40,240 $4,989 $107 $7,426 $12,522 $5,579 $131 $9,261 $14,971 $2,448 S D C CIRCUITS 1.6588 1,141 364 $469 $218 $67 $754 $525 $266 $84 $875 $120 S F P P,L.P. 0.0548 114 114 $16 $22 $21 $58 $17 $27 $26 $70 $12 S M T DYNAMICS LLC 1.6886 3,413 3,402 $478 $651 $628 $1.756 $534 $795 $783 $2.112 $356 S P S TECHNOLOGIES 11.3623 8.736 6,845 $3.215 $1,665 $1.263 $6,143 $3,595 $2,035 $1,575 $7,206 $1,062 S.B.THOMAS INC. 2.1303 30,166 38,606 $603 $5,751 $7,125 $13,479 $674 $7,029 $8,885 $16,588 $3,109 SABA TEXTILES INC. 145.5385 185.038 203.162 $41,176 $35.278 $37,494 $113,947 $46,045 $43,114 $46,756 $135,915 $21,968 G:\excel.dta\fn\210\streed\old d copy\STRATPLN\2003-04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 10 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOO Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase SANMINA CORPORATION 60.5113 70,403 13,678 $17,120 $13,422 $2.524 $33,066 $19,145 $16,404 $3.148 $38,696 $5,630 SANMINA CORPORATION 2.0469 109 392 $579 $21 $72 $672 $648 $26 $90 $763 $91 SANMINA CORPORATION(AIRWAY) 0.5200 1,084 1,084 $147 $207 $200 $554 $165 $253 $250 $667 $113 SANMINACORPORATION(REDHILL) 0.5200 1.084 1,084 $147 $207 $200 $554 $165 $253 $250 $667 $113 SANTA ANA PLATING 6.4546 2,000 1,605 $1,826 $381 $296 $2,504 $2,042 $466 $369 $2,878 $374 SANTANA SERVICES 0.4684 34 275 $133 $7 $51 $190 $148 $8 $63 $220 $30 SCIENTIFIC SPRAY FINISHES,INC. 1.7541 2.396 1.162 $496 $457 $214 $1,168 $555 $558 $267 $1,381 $213 SCISOREK&SON FLAVORS,INC. 1.0082 332,976 28,463 $285 $63.482 $5,253 $69,020 $319 $77.583 $6,550 $84,453 $15.433 SECHRIST INDUSTRIES,INC. 0.6640 1.354 1,380 $188 $258 $255 $701 $210 $315 $318 $843 $142 SELECT CIRCUITS 1.2177 190 190 $345 $36 $35 $416 $385 $44 $44 $473 $57 SEMICOA SEMICONDUCTORS 1.3688 1,471 1,426 $387 $280 $263 $931 $433 $343 $328 $1,104 $173 SEVEN-UP BOTTLING COMPANY 17.5293 347.961 29.241 $4,959 $66,339 $5,396 $76,695 $5.546 $81.075 $6,730 $93,350 $16,656 SHEPARD BROTHERS INC. 1.2227 78.176 5,656 $346 $14,904 $1,044 $16,294 $387 $18,215 $1,302 $19,904 $3,610 SHERWIN D.YOELIN 0.2114 19 19 $60 $4 $4 $67 $67 $4 $4 $76 $9 SHIPLEY COMPANY LLC 0.2678 558 558 $76 $106 $103 $285 $85 $130 $129 $343 $58 SIERRA SPRING WATER COMPANY 0.1170 244 244 $33 $47 $45 $125 $37 $57 $56 $150 $25 SIGNAL ASSOCIATES 0.0615 0 0 $17 $0 $0 $17 $19 $0 $0 $19 $2 SIOUX HONEY ASSOCIATION CO-OP 2.3434 217.634 2.068 $663 $41.492 $382 $42.537 $741 $50,709 $476 $51,926 $9.390 SOLDER STATION ONE INC.-EAST 2.7311 898 143 $773 $171 $26 $970 $864 $209 $33 $1,106 $136 SOLDER STATION ONE INC.-WEST 9.1414 5.026 4.512 $2,586 $958 $833 $4.377 $2,892 $1,171 $1,038 $5,101 $724 SOLDERMASK,INC. 0.6405 509 429 $181 $97 $79 $357 $203 $119 $99 $420 $63 SOUTH BAY CHROME SALES/CHROME EFFECTS 2.1373 688 688 $605 $131 $127 $863 $676 $160 $158 $995 $132 SOUTH COAST CIRCUITS#2 2.1332 977 3.296 $604 $186 $608 $1.398 $675 $228 $758 $1,661 $263 SOUTH COAST CIRCUITS#3 0.3250 678 678 $92 $129 $125 $346 $103 $158 $156 $417 $70 SOUTH COAST CIRCUITS,INC. 2.4427 1,707 1.547 $691 $325 $285 $1,302 $773 $398 $356 $1,526 $225 SOUTH COAST OIL COMPANY 0.5116 98 277 $145 $19 $51 $215 $162 $23 $64 $249 $34 SOUTH COAST OIL CORPORATION 1.7892 0 0 $506 $0 $0 $506 $566 $0 $0 $566 $60 SOUTH COAST WATER 0.1014 211 211 $29 $40 $39 $108 $32 $49 $49 $130 $22 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4.6771 7,089 6,463 $1,323 $1,352 $1,193 $3,868 $1,480 $1,652 $1,487 $4,619 $751 SPEEDY CIRCUITS,FACILITY#2 4.7617 3,485 946 $1,347 $664 $175 $2,186 $1,507 $812 $218 $2,536 $350 SPIVECO,INC. 0.3017 868 299 $85 $165 $55 $306 $95 $202 $69 $366 $60 ST.JOSEPH HOSPITAL 60.0946 125,297 125,297 $17,002 $23,888 $23,124 $64,013 $19,013 $29,194 $28,836 $77,043 $13,029 ST.JUDE MEDICAL CENTER 12.7750 26,636 26,636 $3,614 $5,078 $4,916 $13,608 $4,042 $6,206 $6,130 $16,378 $2,770 STAINLESS MICRO-POLISH INC. 1.9255 551 508 $545 $105 $94 $743 $609 $128 $117 $854 $111 STAR POWDER COATING 0.0198 17 12 $6 $3 $2 $11 $6 $4 $3 $13 $2 STATEK CORPORATION 3.5812 15,812 5,051 $1,013 $3,015 $932 $4,960 $1,133 $3,684 $1,162 $5,980 $1,020 STEELCASE INC. 45.4082 13,934 21,483 $12,847 $2,656 $3,965 $19,468 $14,366 $3,247 $4,944 $22,557 $3,089 STEINER CORP.DBAAMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY 21.6210 104,004 20,470 $6,117 $19,828 $3,778 $29,723 $6,840 $24,233 $4,711 $35,784 $6,061 STEPAN COMPANY 5.1964 373,396 609 $1,470 $71.188 $112 $72.770 $1.644 $87,001 $140 $88,785 $16,015 STEVENS METAL FINISHING,INC. 4.8049 845 2,475 $1,359 $161 $457 $1,977 $1,520 $197 $570 $2,287 $309 STREMICKS HERITAGE FOODS LLC 80.2433 1,493.459 467,928 $22,702 $284,728 $86.356 $393,786 $25,387 $347,976 $107,689 $481,052 $87,266 STRIP CLEAN COMPANY 0.5621 59 12 $159 $11 $2 $172 $178 $14 $3 $194 $22 G:\exeel.dta\fin\210\streed\old d copy\STRATPLM2003-04 permit users for AR.As alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 11 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I .1 K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase SUNCLIPSE INC. 1.2486 3,335 2,031 $353 $636 $375 $1,364 $395 $777 $468 $1,640 $276 SUNCLIPSE,INC.(CORRUGATOR PLANT) 3.7424 41,208 91,722 $1,059 $7.856 $16,927 $25,842 $1,184 $9,601 $21.109 $31,894 $6,052 SUNCLIPSE,INC.DBA CORRU KRAFT it 5.1310 33,316 60,701 $1,452 $6,352 $11.202 $19,006 $1,623 $7,763 $13,970 $23,356 $4,350 SUNDOR BRANDS INC.A PROCTER&GAMBLE C 36.8025 1.642,462 55.737 $10.412 $313,135 $10,286 $333,834 $11,644 $382,694 $12,827 $407,165 $73,331 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.#1 0.5850 1.220 1,220 $166 $233 $225 $623 $185 $284 $281 $750 $127 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.#2 2.0580 1,220 1,22-0 $582 $233 $225 $1,040 $651 $284 $281 $1.216 $176 SUPERIOR FORGE INC. 1.0513 672 672 $297 $128 $124 $550 $333 $157 $155 $644 $94 SUPERIOR PLATING 1.3786 363 312 $390 $69 $58 $517 $436 $85 $72 $592 $76 SUPERIOR PROCESSING 0.3279 86 93 $93 $16 $17 $126 $104 $20 $21 $145 $19 SVG THERMCO SYSTEMS INC. 2.7000 5.630 5.630 $764 $1,073 $1,039 $2,876 $854 $1,312 $1,296 $3,461 $585 T R W-LUCAS AEROSPACE,BREA 1.6926 2,536 2.382 $479 $483 $440 $1,402 $536 $591 $548 $1,675 $273 TAC WEST,INC. 10.6171 107,218 14,944 $3,004 $20,441 $2,758 $26,203 $3,359 $24,982 $3,439 $31,780 $5,577 TAORMINA INDUSTRIES INC.#4 2.2374 2,277 3.079 $633 $434 $568 $1,635 $708 $530 $709 $1,947 $312 TAYCO ENGINEERING,INC. 2.0851 45,119 1,693 $590 $8,602 $312 $9.504 $660 $10,513 $390 $11,562 $2,058 TAYLOR-DUNN MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1.7050 3,585 3,551 $482 $683 $655 $1,821 $539 $835 $817 $2,192 $371 TECHPLATE ENGINEERING CO.INC. 0.0604 104 135 $17 $20 $25 $62 $19 $24 $31 $74 $13 TEXTRON AEROSPACE 12.8491 18,742 7,623 $3.635 $3,573 $1.407 $8,615 $4,065 $4,367 $1,754 $10,186 $1,571 THERMAL-VAC TECHNOLOGY 1.2684 119 675 $359 $23 $125 $506 $401 $28 $155 $584 $78 TIODIZE COMPANY,INC. 2.9349 488 488 $830 $93 $90 $1,013 $929 $114 $112 $1,155 $141 TODDS ENTERPRISES 2.7962 24,177 11.049 $791 $4.609 $2.039 $7,440 $885 $5,633 $2.543 $9,061 $1.621 TOWN&COUNTRY LAUNDRY 0.2237 0 0 $63 $0 $0 $63 $71 $0 $0 $71 $7 TOYOTA RACING DEVELOPMENT 1.9884 4.146 4,146 $563 $790 $765 $2.118 $629 $966 $954 $2,549 $431 TRANSLINE TECHNOLOGY INC. 0.4246 150 150 $120 $29 $28 $176 $134 $35 $35 $204 $27 TREND OFFSET PRINTING SERVICES INC. 7.5966 15,839 15,839 $2,149 $3,020 $2,923 $8,092 $2.403 $3.690 $3.645 $9,739 $1,647 TRIM-LOK/R.T.P. 3.4401 1,376 1.376 $973 $262 $254 $1,490 $1,088 $321 $317 $1,726 $236 TRIPLE A CONTAINERS INC. 0.5148 1,069 3,295 $146 $204 $608 $958 $163 $249 $758 $1,170 $213 TRI-STAR ENGINEERED PRODUCTS,INC. 1.7283 1,942 632 $489 $370 $117 $976 $547 $452 $146 $1,145 $169 TROY SYSTEMS INC. 0.4900 960 977 $139 $187 $180 $506 $155 $228 $225 $608 $102 TUSTIN HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER 2.7183 5,668 5,668 $769 $1,081 $1,046 $2,896 $860 $1,321 $1,304 $3,485 $589 U 0 P 2.4374 24,194 1,283 $690 $4,613 $237 $5,539 $771 $5,637 $295 $6.704 $1,165 U.S.DYEING&FINISHING INC. 266.5025 348,583 183,363 $75,399 $66,457 $33,840 $175,696 $84,316 $81.220 $42,199 $207,735 $32,039 U.W.M.C.HOSPITAL CORPORATION 9.0171 18.801 18,801 $2,551 $3,584 $3,470 $9,605 $2,853 $4,381 $4,327 $11,560 $1,955 UCI MEDICAL CENTER 24.6375 51,369 51.369 $6,970 $9,794 $9,480 $26,244 $7,795 $11,969 $11,822 $31,586 $5,342 ULTRA PURE METAL FINISHING,INC. 3.7257 471 1,376 $1,054 $90 $254 $1,398 $1,179 $110 $317 $1,605 $207 ULTRA WHEEL COMPANY 7.8670 7,642 26.610 $2,226 $1,457 $4,911 $8,594 $2,489 $1.781 $6,124 $10,394 $1,800 UNION INCORPORATED 12.1532 19,855 8.329 $3,438 $3,785 $1,537 $8,761 $3,845 $4,626 $1,917 $10,388 $1,627 UNITED CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY INC. 0,7023 929 521 $199 $177 $96 $472 $222 $216 $120 $559 $87 UNITED CUSTOM POLISHING&PLATING 0.1444 113 156 $41 $21 $29 $91 $46 $26 $36 $108 $17 UNITED YARNS COMPANY,INC. 13.2591 37.552 5,487 $3,751 $7,159 $1,013 $11,923 $4,195 $8,750 $1,263 $14,207 $2,284 UNIVERSAL ALLOY CORP. 6.3683 5,218 5,218 $1,802 $995 $963 $3.759 $2,015 $1,216 $1,201 $4.431 $672 UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS INCORPORATED 16.8751 31,025 7,412 $4,774 $5,915 $1,368 $12,057 $5,339 $7,229 $1,706 $14,274 $2,216 UNOCAL CORPORATION 54.1821 6.849 6,849 $15,329 $1,306 $1,264 $17,899 $17,142 $1,596 $1,576 $20,314 $2,415 G:lexcel.dtalfin12101streedlold d copylSTRATPLW2003-04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/6/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 12 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase UWMC HOSPITAL CORPORATION 34.0269 70,946 70,946 $9,627 $13,526 $13,093 $36,246 $10,765 $16,530 $16,328 $43,623 $7,378 VAN LAW FOOD PRODUCTS,INC. 11.0016 971,210 411,278 $3,113 $185,161 $75,901 $264.175 $3,481 $226,292 $94,652 $324,424 $60,249 VEECO ELECTRO FAB INC.#2 0.0169 30 27 $5 $6 $5 $16 $5 $7 $6 $19 $3 VELIE CIRCUITS INC. 21.7595 7,205 5.672 $6,156 $1,374 $1,047 $8,577 $6,884 $1,679 $1.305 $9,869 $1,292 VERTEQ PROCESS SYSTEMS INC. 2.0404 2,541 2,575 $577 $484 $475 $1,537 $646 $592 $593 $1,830 $293 VICTORY CIRCUITS INC. 0.3460 820 155 $98 $156 $29 $283 $109 $191 $36 $336 $53 VILLA PARK ORCHARDS ASSOCIATION 1.7451 3.280 45,442 $494 $625 $8,386 $9,505 $552 $764 $10,458 $11,774 $2,269 W.M.ELLIOTT 0.0174 0 0 $5 $0 $0 $5 $6 $0 $0 $6 $1 WALKER CUSTOM COATING 0.0252 53 53 $7 $10 $10 $27 $8 $12 $12 $32 $5 WATER MAN 5.0813 230 230 $1.438 $44 $43 $1.524 $1,608 $54 $53 $1,714 $190 WEBER PRECISION GRAPHICS 1.0879 4,368 971 $308 $833 $179 $1.320 $344 $1.018 $224 $1.585 $266 WEIDMANN WATER CONDITIONERS,INC. 5.4686 343 8,959 $1,547 $65 $1.653 $3,266 $1,730 $80 $2,062 $3.872 $606 WESCO SERVICES 0.0631 94 54 $18 $18 $10 $46 $20 $22 $12 $54 $9 WEST AMERICAN RUBBER COMPANY INC. 6.7943 6.685 6,685 $1,922 $1.274 $1,234 $4,430 $2,150 $1,557 $1,538 $5,245 $815 WEST ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 18.8219 39,244 39,244 $5.325 $7,482 $7,242 $20,049 $5.955 $9.144 $9,032 $24.130 $4.081 WEST NEWPORT OIL COMPANY 11.1885 38,586 2,984 $3,165 $7,356 $551 $11,073 $3,540 $8,991 $687 $13,217 $2,145 WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY 13.4847 80,964 65,403 $3,815 $15,436 $12.070 $31,321 $4.266 $18,865 $15,052 $38.163 $6,862 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC. 2.0080 16.706 56,415 $568 $3,185 $10,411 $14,165 $635 $3.893 $12.983 $17,511 $3,347 WILLIAM J.SCOTT 0.8319 0 0 $235 $0 $0 $235 $263 $0 $0 $263 $28 WILVIAN JEWELL RENNER 0.0032 0 0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 WINONICS(BREA) 38.8208 10,492 10,492 $10,983 $2,000 $1,936 $14,920 $12.282 $2.445 $2.415 $17,142 $2.222 WINONICS,INC. 33.9466 18,147 6,360 $9,604 $3.460 $1,174 $14,238 $10.740 $4,228 $1.464 $16.432 $2,194 WINTEC,LLC 0.0995 207 207 $28 $40 $38 $106 $31 $48 $48 $128 $22 WORLD CITRUS WEST 17.7704 336,406 79,141 $5,028 $64,136 $14,606 $83,769 $5,622 $78,383 $18,214 $102,218 $18,449 X Z X ELECTRONICS 0.0552 41 41 $16 $8 $8 $31 $17 $9 $9 $36 $5 Y K K(U.S.A)INC. 5.0427 1.633 1,633 $1.427 $311 $301 $2,039 $1,595 $381 $376 $2.352 $312 Y2K TEXTILE CO.,INC. 0.9818 2,047 2,047 $278 $390 $378 $1,046 $311 $477 $471 $1.259 $213 Total 6,821 20,775,456 8,332,938 $1,929,763 $3,960,841 $1,537.844 $7,428,448 $2,157.990 $4,840,681 $1,917.742 $8,916,4141 $1.487,966 Average per Permit User 14 42.486 17.041 $3.946 $8,100 $3.145 $15,191 $4.413 $9,899 $3,922 $18,234 $3,043 Average per day 19 56.919 22,830 $5.287 $10,852 $4,213 $20,352 $5,912 $13,262 $5.254 $24.429 $4,077 $0 G:\excel.dta\fin\210\streed\ald d copy\STRATPLN\2003-04 permit users for AR.xls alphabetical 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 1 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase DISNEYLAND RESORT 450.4191 939,124 939,124 $127,433 $179.044 $173.315 $479,792 $142,504 $218,816 $216,130 $577,449 $97.658 STREMICKS HERITAGE FOODS LLC 80.2433 1,493,459 467,928 $22,702 $284,728 $86,356 $393,786 $25,387 $347.976 $107.689 $481,052 $87,266 ALSTYLE APPAREL-ACTIVEWEAR MFG.CO.INC. 433.7566 951,033 387,633 $122,718 $181,315 $71,538 $375,571 $137,232 $221,591 $89,210 $448,033 $72,462 SUNDOR BRANDS INC.A PROCTER&GAMBLE C 36.8025 1,642,462 55.737 $10,412 $313,135 $10,286 $333,834 $11,644 $382,694 $12,827 $407,165 $73,331 M C P FOODS INC. 21.3997 1,369,649 25.316 $6,054 $261.124 $4,672 $271.850 $6,770 $319,128 $5.826 $331.725 $59,875 VAN LAW FOOD PRODUCTS,INC. 11.0016 971.210 411.278 $3,113 $185.161 $75.901 $264,175 $3.481 $226,292 $94,652 $324,424 $60,249 HOUSE FOODS AMERICA CORPORATION 64.3995 831,855 299.406 $18,220 $158,593 $55.255 $232,068 $20,375 $193,822 $68,905 $283,102 $51.034 KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE,INC. 414.1119 185,738 391.097 $117,161 $35,411 $72.177 $224,749 $131,017 $43,277 $90,007 $264,301 $39,552 NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO.INC.(TETRA) 76.2985 864,612 83.355 $21,586 $164,838 $15,383 $201,808 $24,139 $201,455 $19,183 $244,777 $42,969 KNOTT'S BERRY FARM FOODS 17.7805 968,676 52,128 $5,030 $184,678 $9,620 $199.329 $5.625 $225,701 $11,997 $243,324 $43,995 NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO.INC.(MAIN) 29.4730 882,895 100,178 $8.339 $168,324 $18,488 $195,150 $9.325 $205,714 $23,055 $238.094 $42,944 FULLERTON CULTURED SPECIALTIES 26.8560 779.440 189,625 $7,598 $148,600 $34,995 $191,194 $8.497 $181,610 $43.640 $233,747 $42,553 U.S.DYEING&FINISHING INC. 266.5025 348.583 183,363 $75,399 $66,457 $33,840 $175,696 $84,316 $81,220 $42,199 $207,735 $32,039 CONEXANT SYSTEMS,INC. 610.1060 15.015 50,212 $172,611 $2,863 $9,267 $184,740 $193,025 $3,498 $11,556 $208,080 $23,339 AERA ENERGY LLC 494.1009 53,733 70,213 $139,791 $10,244 $12,958 $162,993 $156,324 $12.520 $16.159 $185,002 $22.009 ROYALTY CARPET MILLS INC. 147,4230 446,773 60,378 $41,709 $85.177 $11.143 $138,029 $46.642 $104,098 $13.895 $164.635 $26,606 DEAN FOODS CO.OF CALIF.INC(MILK PLANT) 33.3400 454,086 160,163 $9,433 $86.572 $29.558 $125,562 $10,548 $105,802 $36,860 $153,210 $27.648 SABA TEXTILES INC. 145.5385 185,038 203,162 $41,176 $35,278 $37,494 $113.947 $46,045 $43,114 $46.756 $135.915 $21.968 B.BRAUN MEDICAL INC. 260.0845 102,517 51.143 $73,583 $19,545 $9,438 $102,566 $82,286 $23,886 $11,770 $117,942 $15.376 CHROMA SYSTEMS PARTNERS 178.5378 172,246 55.207 $50,512 $32,839 $10,188 $93,539 $56,486 $40,133 $12.705 $109.324 $15,785 WORLD CITRUS WEST 17.7704 336,406 79.141 $5.028 $64,136 $14,606 $83,769 $5,622 $78,383 $18,214 $102.218 $18.449 PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING GROUP 27.7684 313,390 52,055 $7,856 $59,748 $9,607 $77,211 $8,785 $73,020 $11,980 $93.785 $16.574 SEVEN-UP BOTTLING COMPANY 17.5293 347,961 29,241 $4,959 $66,339 $5,396 $76,695 $5.546 $81,075 $6.730 $93.350 $16.656 BOEING COMPANY(GENERAL FAC) 71.6813 150,641 143,667 $20,280 $28,720 $26,514 $75.514 $22,679 $35,099 $33,063 $90,841 $15,328 STEPAN COMPANY 5.1964 373,396 609 $1,470 $71,188 S112 $72.770 $1,644 $87,001 $140 $88.785 $16,015 EXPO DYEING AND FINISHING INC. 102.0456 203,487 41,549 $28,871 $38,795 $7,668 $75.333 $32,285 $47,413 $9,562 $89,260 $13,926 EL METATE FOODS,INC. 4.4657 145,216 211,933 $1.263 $27,685 $39,112 $68,061 $1,413 $33,835 $48,774 $84,022 $15,961 SCISOREK&SON FLAVORS,INC. 1.0082 332,976 28,463 $285 $63,482 $5,253 $69,020 $319 $77,583 $6,550 $84,453 $15,433 AMERIPEC INC. 25.4239 304,552 10,648 $7,193 $58,063 $1,965 $67.221 $8,044 $70,961 $2,451 $81,455 $14,234 ST.JOSEPH HOSPITAL 60.0946 125,297 125.297 $17,002 $23,888 $23,124 $64,013 $19,013 $29,194 $28,836 $77,043 $13,029 DEAN FOODS CO.OF CALIF.INC.(ICE CREAM) 12.3877 223,995 87.388 $3,505 $42,705 $16.127 $62.337 $3,919 $52,191 $20,111 $76,222 $13,885 FAIRVIEW STATE HOSPITAL 44.5279 126,635 98,782 $12,598 $24,143 $18.230 $54,971 $14.088 $29.506 $22,734 $66,327 $11,356 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT FULLERTON 85.3916 71,217 53,412 $24,159 $13,577 $9,857 $47,594 $27.016 $16,593 $12,292 $55,902 $8,308 ANGELICA TEXTILE 97.7260 54,716 43,558 $27,649 $10,432 $8,039 $46,119 $30.919 $12.749 $10,024 $53,692 $7,573 SIOUX HONEY ASSOCIATION CO-OP 2.3434 217,634 2,068 $663 $41,492 $382 $42,537 $741 $50,709 $476 $51,926 $9,390 MARUCHAN,INC. 14.1720 155,496 27,279 $4,010 $29.645 $5,034 $38,689 $4,484 $36,231 $6,278 $46,992 $8,303 JOHN A.THOMAS 19.3814 155,499 11,477 $5,483 $29,646 $2,118 $37,247 $6,132 $36,231 $2,641 $45,004 $7,757 UWMC HOSPITAL CORPORATION 34.0269 70,946 70.946 $9,627 $13,526 $13,093 $36.246 $10,765 $16,530 $16,328 $43,623 $7,378 CITY OF ANAHEIM-WATER SERVICES 7.6110 95 163,891 $2,153 $18 $30,246 $32,417 $2,408 $22 $37,718 $40,148 $7,730 CITY OF TUSTIN WATER SERVICE(17TH ST.) 120.5313 4,077 27,192 $34,101 $777 $5,018 $39,896 $38,134 $950 $6,258 $45,342 $5,445 WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY 13.4847 80,964 65,403 $3,815 $15,436 $12,070 $31,321 $4,266 $18,865 $15,052 $38.183 $6,862 PRECISION ANODIZING AND PLATING INC. 24.7056 1,689 122.259 $6.990 $322 $22,563 $29,875 $7,816 $394 $28,137 $36,347 $6,472 G:\excel.dta\fin\210Lstreed\old d copy\STRATPLN\2003-04 permit users for AR.xls high to low 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 2 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chi Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION 7.0132 145,786 4,139 $1,984 $27,794 $764 $30,542 $2,219 $33,968 $952 $37,140 $6,597 SANMINA CORPORATION 60.5113 70,403 13.678 $17,120 $13,422 $2.524 $33,066 $19.145 $16,404 $3.148 $38,696 $5,630 STEINER CORP.DBAAMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY 21.6210 104,004 20,470 $6,117 $19,828 $3.778 $29,723 $6.840 $24,233 $4.711 $35,784 $6.061 SUNCLIPSE,INC.(CORRUGATOR PLANT) 3.7424 41,208 91,722 $1,059 $7,856 $16 927 $25.842 $1.184 $9,601 $21,109 $31,894 $6,052 UCI MEDICAL CENTER 24.6375 51,369 51.369 $6,970 $9.794 $9,480 $26.244 $7.795 $11,969 $11.822 $31,586 $5.342 TAC WEST,INC. 10.6171 107,218 14,944 $3.004 $20,441 $2.758 $26,203 $3,359 $24,982 $3,439 $31,730 $5,577 ANAHEIM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 24.3460 50,761 50,761 $6.888 $9,678 $9,368 $25,934 $7,703 $11,827 $11,682 $31,212 $5,279 K U A TEXTILES INC. 11.6955 40,602 66,074 $3,309 $7,741 $12,194 $23,244 $3,700 $9.460 $15,206 $28,367 $5,123 BOEING CO.-SEMICONDUCTOR 21.8348 43,480 43,480 $6,178 $8,289 $8.024 $22,491 $6.908 $10,131 $10,007 $27,046 $4,554 JOINT FORCES TRAINING BASE,LOS ALAMITOS 37.5063 31,618 35,754 $10,611 $6,028 $6.598 $23,238 $11.866 $7,367 $8,228 $27,462 $4,224 GOODWIN COMPANY 8.1710 90,626 13,532 $2,312 $17,278 $2.497 $22,087 $2,585 $21,116 $3.114 $26,815 $4,728 EL TORO MEAT SHOP 4.0017 73,560 33,662 $1,132 $14.024 $6.212 $21,369 $1.266 $17,139 $7,747 $26,152 $4,784 ITT CANNON,A DIVISION OF ITT INDUSTRIES 63.6795 17,771 14.417 $18,016 $3,388 $2.661 $24,065 $20.147 $4,141 $3,318 $27,605 $3,541 LOS ANGELES TIMES COMMUNICATIONS LLC 10.4097 91,451 10,557 $2,945 $17,435 $1,948 $22,329 $3,293 $21,308 $2.430 $27,031 $4,703 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 14.9712 56,755 30,986 $4,236 $10,820 $5,718 $20,775 $4,737 $13,224 $7,131 $25,092 $4,317 POWER CIRCUITS,INC. 32.4458 53.598 11,921 $9,180 $10,219 $2.200 $21,598 $10,265 $12,488 $2,744 $25,497 $3,899 ORANGE COUNTY METAL PROCESSING 20.5521 596 76,655 $5,815 $114 $14 147 $20,075 $6,502 $139 $17,641 $24,283 $4,208 CALIF CONSOLIDATED WATER PURIFICATION 15.2512 809 80,498 $4,315 $154 $14,856 $19,325 $4,825 $188 $18.526 $23,539 $4,214 WEST ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 18.8219 39,244 39,244 $5.325 $7.482 $7.242 $20,049 $5,955 $9,144 $9,032 $24,130 $4,081 CLEUGH'S RHUBARB COMPANY 5.6441 90,268 6,329 $1,597 $17,210 $1.168 $19,974 $1,786 $21,032 $1,457 $24,275 $4.300 SUNCLIPSE,INC.DBA CORRU KRAFT II 5.1310 33,316 60,701 $1,452 $6,352 $11 202 $19,006 $1,623 $7,763 $13,970 $23,356 $4,350 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 18.2500 38,051 38,051 $5,163 $7,254 $7.022 $19,440 $5,774 $8,866 $8,757 $23,397 $3,957 GEMINI INDUSTRIES INC. 5.2064 3,294 97,527 $1,473 $628 $17.999 $20,100 $1,647 $768 $22,445 $24,860 $4,760 DON MIGUEL MEXICAN FOODS INC. 9.7970 65.583 17,482 $2,772 $12,503 $3.226 $18,501 $3,100 $15,281 $4,023 $22,404 $3,902 PILKINGTON AEROSPACE 6.9638 6.035 76,149 $1,970 $1,151 $14.053 $17,174 $2,203 $1,406 $17,525 $21,134 $3,960 K CA ELECTRONICS INC. 49.2322 15,815 13,489 $13,929 $3,015 $2.489 $19.433 $15.576 $3.685 $3,104 $22.366 $2,932 MARGARETIS TEXTILE SERVICE 22.3527 22,580 37,986 $6,324 $4,305 $7,010 $17,639 $7,072 $5,261 $8,742 $21,075 $3,436 STEELCASE INC. 45.4082 13,934 21,483 $12.847 $2,656 $3.965 $19,468 $14,366 $3,247 $4,944 $22,557 $3.089 GOGLANIAN BAKERIES 6.5012 42,955 33,546 $1,839 $8,189 $6.191 $16.220 $2,057 $10,008 $7,720 $19,786 $3,566 SHEPARD BROTHERS INC. 12227 78,176 5.656 $346 $14,904 $1.044 $16,294 $387 $18.215 $1,302 $19,904 $3,610 MICROMETALS INC.#2 7.6480 69,632 4,779 $2,164 $13,275 S882 $16,321 $2,420 $16.224 $1,100 $19,744 $3,423 UNOCAL CORPORATION 54.1821 6,849 6,849 $15,329 $1,306 $1.264 $17,899 $17,142 $1,596 $1,576 $20,314 $2,415 LA PALMA INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL 14.8976 31,061 31,061 $4,215 $5,922 $5,732 $15,869 $4,713 $7,237 $7,148 $19,099 $3,230 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC. 2.0080 16,706 56,415 $568 $3,185 $10,411 $14.165 $635 $3,893 $12,983 $17,511 $3,347 HEALTH CARE APPAREL SERVICES 15.5639 33,355 21,860 $4,403 $6,359 $4.034 $14.797 $4,924 $7.772 $5,031 $17,727 $2.930 S.B.THOMAS INC. 2.1303 30,166 38,606 $603 $5.751 $7.125 $13,479 $674 $7.029 $8,885 $16.588 $3,109 MICRO SEMI CORP. 32.1131 17,195 14,538 $9.085 $3.278 $2.683 $15,047 $10,160 $4.006 $3,346 $17,512 $2,465 MULTI-FINELINE ELECTRONIX INC. 20.3149 24,556 21.665 $5,747 $4,682 $3.998 $14,427 $6,427 $5.722 $4,986 $17,135 $2,707 WINONICS(BREA) 38.8208 10,492 10.492 $10,983 $2,000 $1.936 $14,920 $12,282 $2.445 $2,415 $17,142 $2,222 ST.JUDE MEDICAL CENTER 12.7750 26,636 26,636 $3,614 $5,078 $4.916 $13,608 $4,042 $6,206 $6,130 $16,378 $2.770 AIR INDUSTRIES CORP.-KNOTT 11.5559 15,386 37,058 $3,269 $2,933 $6,839 $13,042 $3,656 $3,585 $8,529 $15,770 $2,728 ENTHONE INC. 3.7599 41,749 24,184 $1.064 $7,959 $4,463 $13,486 $1,190 $9,727 $5,566 $16,483 $2.996 G:kexcel.dtaVinQ10\streedlold d copylSTRATPLN12003-04 permit users for AR.xls high to low 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 3 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase WINONICS,INC. 33.9466 18,147 6.360 $9,604 $3,460 $1,174 $14.238 $10,740 $4,228 $1.464 $16,432 $2,194 GRANDE TORTILLA INC. 2.1065 44,602 19,111 $596 $8,503 $3,527 $12.626 $666 $10,392 $4.398 $15.457 $2,831 S&S POLISHING/PLATING 17.6328 564 40,240 $4.989 $107 $7.426 $12,522 $5,579 $131 $9.261 $14,971 $2.448 UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS INCORPORATED 16.8751 31.025 7,412 $4,774 $5.915 $1,368 $12,057 $5,339 $7,229 $1.706 $14,274 $2.216 UNITED YARNS COMPANY,INC. 13.2591 37,552 5.487 $3,751 $7,159 $1.013 $11,923 $4,195 $8,750 $1,263 $14.207 $2,284 CASE SWAYNE,INC. 9.1525 40,506 5,722 $2,589 $7,722 $1,056 $11,368 $2,896 $9,438 $1.317 $13,650 $2,283 DYNAMIC DETAILS INC. 16.3837 23,383 12.606 $4,635 $4,458 $2,326 $11,420 $5,183 $5,448 $2,901 $13,533 $2,113 WEST NEWPORT OIL COMPANY 11.1885 38,586 2.984 $3,165 $7,356 $551 $11,073 $3,540 $8,991 $687 $13,217 $2,145 GERARD TILE 3.3057 4,108 45,503 $935 $783 $8,398 $10,116 $1,046 $957 $10,472 $12,475 $2,359 BECKMAN COULTER,INC. 14.7494 15,963 19,927 $4.173 $3,043 $3.678 $10,894 $4.666 $3,719 $4,586 $12,972 $2,078 PACKARD-HUGHES INTERCONNECT SYSTEMS 31.6408 10,711 6,746 $8,952 $2,042 $1,245 $12,239 $10,011 $2,496 $1,553 $14,059 $1,820 VILLA PARK ORCHARDS ASSOCIATION 1,7451 3,280 45,442 $494 $625 $8.386 $9,505 $552 $764 $10,458 $11,774 $2,269 PLACENTIA LINDA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 9.5650 19,943 19,943 $2,706 $3,802 $3,680 $10,189 $3,026 $4,647 $4,590 $12,263 $2.074 JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION(U.S.) 8.3453 34,769 8.161 $2,361 $6,629 $1,506 $10,496 $2,640 $8,101 $1,878 $12,620 $2,124 U.W.M.C.HOSPITAL CORPORATION 9.0171 18,801 18.801 $2,551 $3,584 $3.470 $9,605 $2,853 $4,381 $4,327 $11.560 $1,955 TAYCO ENGINEERING,INC. 2.0851 45,119 1.693 $590 $8,602 $312 $9,504 $660 $10,513 $390 $11,562 $2,058 HARTE-HANKS SHOPPERS 7.2631 29,797 9,312 $2,055 $5,681 $1,718 $9,454 $2,298 $6.943 $2,143 $11,383 $1,929 MCCURDY CIRCUITS,INC. 14.4135 12,858 16,519 $4,078 $2,451 $3.049 $9,578 $4,560 $2,996 $3,802 $11,358 $1,780 ULTRA WHEEL COMPANY 7.8670 7,642 26,610 $2,226 $1,457 $4,911 $8,594 $2,489 $1.781 $6,124 $10,394 $1,800 FAIRCHILD FASTENERS 8.1900 17,076 17,076 $2,317 $3,256 $3,151 $8,724 $2,591 $3,979 $3,930 $10,500 $1,776 TEXTRON AEROSPACE 12.8491 18,742 7.623 $3,635 $3,573 $1,407 $8,615 $4,065 $4,367 $1,754 $10,186 $1,571 PRIMATEX INDUSTRIES OF CA INC 15.8706 6,800 15.302 $4,490 $1,296 $2,824 $8,610 $5,021 $1.584 $3,522 $10,127 $1.517 ANAHEIM GENERAL HOSPITAL 7.6776 16,008 16.008 $2,172 $3,052 $2,954 $8,178 $2,429 $3,730 $3,684 $9,843 $1,665 TREND OFFSET PRINTING SERVICES INC. 7.5966 15,839 15.839 $2,149 $3,020 $2,923 $8.092 $2,403 $3.690 $3,645 $9,739 $1,647 UNION INCORPORATED 12.1532 19,855 8.329 $3,438 $3,785 $1.537 $8.761 $3,845 $4,626 $1,917 $10,388 $1,627 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS CORPORATION 13.4392 11,503 12.225 $3,802 $2,193 $2,256 $8,251 $4,252 $2,680 $2,813 $9,746 $1.494 VELIE CIRCUITS INC. 21.7595 7,205 5.672 $6,156 $1,374 $1,047 $8,577 $6,884 $1,679 $1,305 $9,869 $1,292 MARCEL ELECTRONICS INT. 24.5656 5,942 3,427 $6,950 $1,133 $632 $8,715 $7,772 $1,384 $789 $9,945 $1,230 IDEAL UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE 7.7102 17,632 12,092 $2,181 $3,361 $2,232 $7,775 $2,439 $4,108 $2,783 $9,331 $1,556 BURROWS IND.DBA MINUTEMAN PUMPING 5.8124 23,449 8,681 $1,644 $4,471 $1,602 $7,717 $1,839 $5,464 $1.998 $9.300 $1,583 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 6.2688 21,555 10.820 $1,774 $4,109 $1,997 $7,880 $1.983 $5,022 $2,490 $9,496 $1,616 LOS ALAMITOS GENERAL HOSPITAL 6.8438 14,269 14,269 $1,936 $2,720 $2.633 $7,290 $2,165 $3.325 $3,284 $8,774 $1,484 TODDS ENTERPRISES 2.7962 24,177 11,049 $791 $4,609 $2,039 $7,440 $885 $5,633 $2,543 $9,061 $1.621 CENTURY LAMINATORS INC. 20.7897 4,924 4,432 $5,882 $939 $818 $7,639 $6,577 $1.147 $1,020 $8,745 $1,106 CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 21.3383 272 8,086 $6,037 $52 $1,492 $7.581 $6,751 $63 $1,861 $8,675 $1,094 CAL-AURUM INDUSTRIES INC. 22.6959 1,160 3,560 $6,421 $221 $657 $7.299 $7,181 $270 $819 $8,270 $971 COPPER CLAD MULTILAYER PRODUCTS INC. 17.8300 8.522 2.268 $5,044 $1,625 $418 $7,088 $5,641 $1,986 $522 $8,149 $1,061 EMBEE INC.#2 23.0950 1.118 2.247 $6,534 $213 $415 $7,162 $7,307 $261 $517 $8,084 $923 IDEAL ANODIZING INC. 6.7268 1.163 21,247 $1,903 $222 $3,921 $6,046 $2.128 $271 $4,890 $7,289 $1.243 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 3.4274 21,353 4,577 $970 $4,071 $845 $5.885 $1.084 $4,975 $1,053 $7,113 $1,228 S P S TECHNOLOGIES 11.3623 8,736 6,845 $3,215 $1.665 $1,263 $6,143 $3.595 $2,035 $1,575 $7,206 $1,062 LINFINITY MICROELECTRONICS INC. 19.5700 2,842 2,208 $5,537 $542 $407 $6.486 $6,192 $662 $508 $7,361 $876 WexcelAtalfin\210LstreedWld d copytSTRATPLN%2003-04 permit users for AR.xls high to low 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 4 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg Boo Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG lbs lbs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase NELCO PRODUCTS,INC. 14.7821 5,459 5.459 $4,182 $1,041 $1.007 $6,230 $4,677 $1,272 $1,256 $7,205 $975 CARGILL INC. 4.4876 16,298 6,427 $1,270 $3,107 $1,186 $5,563 $1,420 $3,797 $1,479 $6.696 $1,133 U O P 2.4374 24,194 1,283 $690 $4,613 $237 $5,539 $771 $5,637 $295 $6,704 $1,165 COOPER AND BRAIN INC. 16.5687 1,658 4,560 $4,688 $316 $842 $5.845 $5,242 $386 $1,049 $6,678 $833 FULLERTON FOODS-OSCAR MAYER FOODS COI 6.8181 9,160 9,160 $1,929 $1,746 $1.691 $5.366 $2,157 $2,134 $2,108 $6,400 $1,034 ANAHEIM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER-WEST 4.9275 10,274 10,274 $1,394 $1,959 $1.896 $5,249 $1,559 $2,394 $2.364 $6,317 $1,068 ALPHANETICS INC. 12.1232 8,052 2,342 $3,430 $1.535 $432 $5,397 $3,836 $1,876 $539 $6,251 $853 FROZSUN FOODS,INC. 2.5021 16,095 6,209 $708 $3,068 $1,146 $4,922 $792 $3,750 $1,429 $5,971 $1,048 STATEK CORPORATION 3.5812 15,812 5,051 $1,013 $3,015 $932 $4,960 $1,133 $3,684 $1,162 $5.980 $1,020 DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS 12.4876 4.691 4.862 $3,533 $894 $897 $5,325 $3,951 $1,093 $1,119 $6,163 $838 KIRKHILL RUBBER CO(SOUTH) 4.7765 9,490 9,380 $1,351 $1,809 $1.731 $4,892 $1,511 $2,211 $2,159 $5,881 $989 ARNOLD ELECTRONICS,INC.#1 12.7707 3,120 5,512 $3,613 $595 $1.017 $5,225 $4,040 $727 $1,269 $6,036 $811 HIXSON METAL FINISHING 16A457 1,032 2,894 $4,653 $197 $534 $5,384 $5.203 $240 $666 $6,110 $726 DYE TECHNIQUE INC. 10.4011 8,415 4,648 $2,943 $1,604 $858 $5,405 $3,291 $1,961 $1,070 $6,321 $916 AIR INDUSTRIES CORP.(CHAPMAN) 1.8805 13,669 8.259 $532 $2,606 $1.524 $4,662 $595 $3.185 $1,901 $5,681 $1,018 ASTECH MANUFACTURING INC. 17.6119 1,955 1,955 $4,983 $373 $361 $5,716 $5,572 $455 $450 $6,477 $761 JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY INC. 12.0868 4,215 4,562 $3,420 $804 $842 $5,065 $3,824 $982 $1,050 $5,856 $791 COLUMBIA HUNTINGTON BEACH HOSPITAL 4.3800 9,132 9,132 $1,239 $1,741 $1.685 $4,666 $1,386 $2,128 $2,102 $5,615 $950 FABRICATION CONCEPTS CORPORATION 6.2408 8,666 7,193 $1,766 $1,652 $1.328 $4,745 $1,974 $2,019 $1,655 $5,649 $904 CONTINUOUS COATING CORPORATION 15.0683 1,135 3,558 $4,263 $216 S657 $5,136 $4,767 $264 $819 $5,851 $714 BRINDLE/THOMAS OIL COMPANY 2.1900 20,347 603 $620 $3,879 Sill $4,610 $693 $4,741 $139 $5,572 $962 J.R.&D INC. 2.3661 10,869 8.604 $669 $2,072 $1,588 $4,329 $749 $2,532 $1,980 $5,261 $932 DUCOMMUNAEROSTRUCTURES 8.0778 7,665 4.626 $2,285 $1,461 $854 $4,601 $2,556 $1,786 $1,065 $5,406 $806 ELECTROLURGY INC. 11.6743 1,152 7,923 $3,303 $220 $1,462 $4,985 $3.694 $268 $1,823 $5,785 $801 WEST AMERICAN RUBBER COMPANY INC. 6.7943 6,685 6,685 $1,922 $1,274 $1.234 $4.430 $2,150 $1,557 $1,538 $5,245 $815 CIRTECH INC. 6.6467 6,459 6,610 $1,880 $1,231 $1.220 $4,332 $2,103 $1,505 $1,521 $5,129 $797 ANODYNE INC. 10.9589 1,929 5,590 $3,100 $368 $1,032 $4,500 $3,467 $449 $1,286 $5,203 $703 ELECTRONIC PRECISION SPECIALTIES INC. 12.7574 1,003 4,177 $3,609 $191 $771 $4,571 $4,036 $234 $961 $5,231 $660 SOLDER STATION ONE INC.-WEST 9.1414 5,026 4,512 $2,586 $958 $833 $4,377 $2,892 $1,171 $1,038 $5,101 $724 1 C N PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 8.1930 5,082 5,082 $2,318 $969 $938 $4,225 $2,592 $1,184 $1,170 $4,946 $721 ARTISTIC PLATING&METAL FINISHING INC. 11.4569 2,561 3,269 $3,241 $488 $603 $4,333 $3,625 $597 $752 $4,974 $641 BRISTOL INDUSTRIES 9.0225 3,780 5,043 $2,553 $721 $931 $4,204 $2,855 $881 $1.161 $4,896 $692 RICOH ELECTRONICS#2 3.5439 10,807 5,910 $1,003 $2,060 $1.091 $4,154 $1,121 $2,518 $1,360 $4,999 $846 PIONEER CIRCUITS 9.5534 4,795 3,238 $2,703 $914 $598 $4,215 $3,023 $1,117 $745 $4,885 $670 EMBEE INC.#1 14,5871 835 835 $4,127 $159 $154 $4,440 $4,615 $195 $192 $5,002 $561 JONATHAN MANUFACTURING CORP. 3.5390 10,291 5,000 $1,001 $1,962 $923 $3,886 $1,120 $2,398 $1,151 $4,668 $782 MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES,INC. 3.7900 8,396 7,692 $1,072 $1,601 $1,420 $4,093 $1,199 $1,956 $1,770 $4,926 $833 MONOGRAM SYSTEMS 5.7550 5,841 6,407 $1,628 $1,114 $1,182 $3,924 $1.821 $1,361 $1,475 $4,656 $732 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4.6771 7,089 6,463 $1,323 $1.352 $1.193 $3,868 $1,480 $1,652 $1,487 $4,619 $751 COSMOTRONIC CORPORATION 4.8467 11.512 2,791 $1.371 $2,195 $515 $4,081 $1,533 $2,682 $642 $4,858 $777 UNIVERSAL ALLOY CORP. 6.3683 5,218 5,218 $1,802 $995 S963 $3,759 $2,015 $1,216 $1,201 $4,431 $672 DERM COSMETICS LAB'S INC. 0.3472 9,684 8,185 $98 $1,846 $1.510 $3,455 $110 $2,256 $1,884 $4,250 $795 G:lexcel.dtalf'in12lmstreedlold d copytSTRATPLN12003-04 permit users for AR.xls high to low 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 5 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase CATALINA CYLINDERS A DIV.OF APP 7.1849 3,961 5,132 $2,033 $755 S947 $3,735 $2,273 $923 $1,181 $4,377 $642 ALUMINUM FORGE-DIV.OF ALUM.PRECISION 3.4055 3,014 11,953 $963 $575 $2,206 $3,744 $1,077 $702 $2,751 $4,531 $787 PRECISION RESOURCE,CALIFORNIA DIVISION 4.3735 7,575 4,238 $1,237 $1,444 $782 $3,464 $1,384 $1,765 $975 $4,124 $660 BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION 10.1391 2,033 2,033 $2,869 $388 $375 $3,631 $3.208 $474 $468 $4,149 $518 WEIDMANN WATER CONDITIONERS,INC. 5.4686 343 8,959 $1,547 $65 $1,653 $3,266 $1,730 $80 $2,062 $3.872 $606 CREST COATING INC. 3.0720 8.755 3,780 $869 $1.669 $698 $3,236 $972 $2,040 $870 $3.882 $646 A P W ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS LLC SOUTH 4.0854 3,237 7,828 $1,156 $617 $1,445 $3,218 $1,293 $754 $1,802 $3.848 $631 INTEC PRODUCTS INC. 5.6341 319 8,547 $1,594 $61 $1,577 $3,232 $1,783 $74 $1,967 $3,824 $592 L&N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO.INC.(WAREHOUSE) 5.4639 5,539 3,693 $1,546 $1,056 $681 $3.283 $1.729 $1,291 $850 $3,869 $586 MEAD PACKAGING 2.1577 8,319 4,729 $610 $1,586 S873 $3,069 $683 $1,938 $1,088 $3,709 $640 ANOMIL ENT.DBA DANCO METAL SURFACING 5.8670 511 7,450 $1.660 $97 $1,375 $3,132 $1,856 $119 $1,715 $3,690 $558 FULLERTON PLATING 8.5731 73 4,488 $2,426 $14 $828 $3,268 $2,712 $17 $1,033 $3,762 $495 EMBEE INC.#3 10.0162 1,810 1,012 $2,834 $345 $187 $3.365 $3,169 $422 $233 $3.823 $458 ACCURATE METAL FABRICATORS INC. 3.5061 5,627 5,049 $992 $1,073 $932 $2.996 $1,109 $1,311 $1,162 $3,582 $586 PLATECORP#2,INC. 7.6584 2,534 2,948 $2,167 $483 $544 $3,194 $2,423 $590 $679 $3,692 $498 BREA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2.7375 5,708 5,708 $774 $1.088 $1,053 $2,916 $866 $1.330 $1.314 $3,510 $594 CHAPMAN MEDICAL CENTER 2.7375 5,708 5.708 $774 $1,088 $1,053 $2,916 $866 $1.330 $1,314 $3,510 $594 NEWPORT CORPORATION 5,5577 4,767 3,988 $1,572 $909 $736 $3,217 $1,758 $1,111 $918 $3,787 $570 SVG THERMCO SYSTEMS INC. 2.7000 5.630 5,630 $764 $1.073 $1,039 $2,876 $854 $1,312 $1,296 $3,461 $585 ALUMINUM PRECISION PRODUCTS INC.-SUSAN 6.0653 2,412 4,304 $1,716 $460 S794 $2,970 $1,919 $562 $991 $3,472 $501 FUTURE TECHNOLOGY 5.6915 2,420 4,677 $1,610 $461 S863 $2,935 $1,801 $564 $1,076 $3,441 $506 DETAILS INC#3,DBA DYNAMIC DETAILS INC. 10.5543 465 465 $2,986 $89 $86 $3,160 $3,339 $108 $107 $3,554 $394 CAMBRO MANUFACTURING 3.9216 4,472 4,472 $1,109 $853 S826 $2,788 $1,241 $1,042 $1,029 $3.312 $525 TUSTIN HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER 2.7183 5,668 5,668 $769 $1,081 $1,046 $2,896 $860 $1,321 $1.304 $3,485 $589 EATON CORPORATION 3.0841 2,775 6,901 $873 $529 $1,274 $2,675 $976 $647 $1.588 $3.211 $535 HYATT DIE CASTING&ENGINEERING CORP. 2.3278 7,857 2,164 $659 $1.498 $399 $2,556 $736 $1,831 $498 $3,065 $509 DATA ELECTRONIC SERVICES INC. 3.9182 6.992 622 $1.109 $1,333 S115 $2.556 $1,240 $1,629 $143 $3.012 $456 B I TECHNOLOGIES,INC. 4.4032 3,566 3.258 $1,246 $680 $601 $2,527 $1,393 $831 $750 $2,974 $447 ARROWHEAD PURITAS WATERS(R/0 REJECT) 5.5100 1,812 3,418 $1,559 $345 $631 $2,535 $1.743 $422 $787 $2,952 $417 PANEL CONCEPTS INC. 4.5220 2,607 3,586 $1,279 $497 $662 $2,438 $1,431 $607 $825 $2,863 $425 SANTA ANA PLATING 6.4546 2,000 1,605 $1,826 $381 S296 $2,504 $2,042 $466 $369 $2,878 $374 MARKLAND MANUFACTURING,INC. 5.2878 2,520 2.520 $1.496 $480 $465 $2,442 $1,673 $587 $580 $2,840 $399 COASTLINE METAL FINISHING CORP. 6.6595 1,174 2,112 $1,884 $224 S390 $2,498 $2,107 $274 $486 $2,866 $369 PRO-TECH 2.8454 4,413 3.471 $605 $841 S641 $2,287 $900 $1.028 $799 $2,727 $440 OMNI METAL FINISHING,INC. 6.6953 1,206 1,838 $1,894 $230 S339 $2,463 $2,118 $281 $423 $2,822 $359 DONG PHUONG TOFU 0,5346 9,865 937 $151 $1.881 $173 $2,205 $169 $2,299 $216 $2,683 $478 INTEGRATED AEROSPACE,INC. 4.0871 3,401 3,401 $1,156 $648 $628 $2,432 $1,293 $792 $783 $2,868 $436 P C A METAL FINISHING,INC. 4.9676 2,166 2,304 $1,405 $413 S425 $2,244 $1,572 $505 $530 $2,607 $363 HAMILTON MATERIALS 1.6075 2,923 5,535 $455 $557 $1.021 $2.034 $509 $681 $1,274 $2,464 $430 SPEEDY CIRCUITS,FACILITY#2 4.7617 3,485 946 $1.347 $664 S175 $2,186 $1.507 $812 $218 $2,536 $350 HARTWELL CORPORATION 2.3366 4,067 3,269 $661 $775 $603 $2,040 $739 $948 $752 $2,439 $399 PRINTRONIX,INC. 2.8432 3,865 3.375 $804 $737 S623 $2,164 $900 $901 $777 $2,577 $413 GAexce1.dtaVin\2101streed101d d copy\STRATPLN12003-04 permit users for AR.xls high to IOW 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 6 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase TOYOTA RACING DEVELOPMENT 1.9884 4,146 4,146 $563 $790 $765 $2.118 $629 $966 $954 $2,549 $431 PACIFIC QUARTZ,INC. 1.6697 2,225 5,662 $472 $424 $1.045 $1,941 $528 $518 $1,303 $2.350 $408 A P W ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS,LLC 2.8923 4,386 1,979 $818 $836 S365 $2,020 $915 $1,022 $455 $2,392 $373 PLEION CORPORATION#2 3.5065 2.373 2,973 $992 $452 S549 $1,993 $1,109 $553 $684 $2,347 $353 R B C TRANSPORT DYNAMICS CORP. 2.1675 2,958 4,021 $613 $564 $742 $1.919 $686 $689 $925 $2,300 $381 BLACK OXIDE INDUSTRIES INC. 5.8769 1,051 1,336 $1,663 $200 $246 $2,109 $1,859 $245 $307 $2,412 $302 ACCURATE CIRCUIT ENGINEERING 1.8284 6,282 1.246 $517 $1.198 S230 $1,945 $578 $1.464 $287 $2,329 $384 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY(BAKERY) 1.7875 3,727 3.727 $506 $711 S688 $1,904 $566 $868 $858 $2,292 $388 BEARING INSPECTION INC. 1.6625 3,539 3,981 $470 $675 S735 $1,880 $526 $825 $916 $2,267 $387 Y K K(U.S.A)INC. 5.0427 1.633 1.633 $1,427 $311 $301 $2.039 $1,595 $381 $376 $2,352 $312 A M F ELECTRONICS INC. 3.6776 2,251 2,575 $1,040 $429 $475 $1.945 $1,164 $524 $593 $2,281 $336 STEVENS METAL FINISHING,INC. 4.8049 845 2,475 $1,359 $161 S457 $1,977 $1,520 $197 $570 $2.287 $309 TAYLOR-DUNN MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1.7050 3,585 3,551 $482 $683 S655 $1,821 $539 $835 $817 $2,192 $371 AMERICAN CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY INC. 4.0483 1,352 2,788 $1,145 $258 S515 $1,918 $1,281 $315 $642 $2.237 $320 MAGNETIC METALS CORPORATION 1.5807 5,849 1,451 $447 $1,115 S268 $1,830 $500 $1,363 $334 $2,197 $367 ACTIVE PLATING INC. 5.5755 1,142 1,097 $1,577 $218 S202 $1,998 $1,764 $266 $252 $2,283 $285 ORANGE RESOURCE RECOVERY SYSTEMS 0.4718 6.060 2,487 $133 $1.155 $459 $1,748 $149 $1,412 $572 $2,133 $386 ANO D'ART,INC. 4.9479 346 2,459 $1,400 $66 S454 $1,920 $1,565 $81 $566 $2,212 $292 RICOH ELECTRONICS INC. 3.2640 3,111 2,384 $923 $593 S440 $1,956 $1,033 $725 $549 $2,306 $350 MURRIETTA CIRCUITS INC. 3.2471 1,701 3,156 $919 $324 S582 $1,825 $1,027 $396 $726 $2,150 $325 S M T DYNAMICS LLC 1.6886 3,413 3,402 $478 $651 $628 $1,756 $534 $795 $783 $2,112 $356 CERADYNE INC.(MACHINE SHOP) 1.3397 5.178 2,438 $379 $987 $450 $1.816 $424 $1,207 $561 $2,191 $375 REVERE TRANSDUCERS,INC. 2.4990 3.405 2,648 $707 $649 S489 $1,845 $791 $793 $609 $2,193 $349 ALUMINUM PRECISION PRODUCTS INC.CENTRAt 1.5704 5,338 1,103 $444 $1,018 S204 $1,666 $497 $1,244 $254 $1,994 $329 AMETEKAEROSPACE 1.5314 3.193 3.193 $433 $609 $589 $1,631 $485 $744 $735 $1,963 $332 O C B REPROGRAPHICS 1.6250 3,388 3,388 $460 $646 S625 $1,731 $514 $789 $780 $2,083 $352 BURLINGTON ENGINEERING INC. 1.2675 5,905 850 $359 $1.126 S157 $1,641 $401 $1,376 $196 $1,972 $331 ORANGE COUNTY PLATING CO.,INC. 4.2196 1,235 1,710 $1,194 $235 S316 $1,745 $1,335 $288 $393 $2,016 $271 B A F INDUSTRIES 2.2747 4,503 919 $644 $858 $170 $1,672 $720 $1,049 $212 $1.980 $309 TAORMINA INDUSTRIES INC.94 2.2374 2.277 3,079 $633 $434 S568 $1,635 $708 $530 $709 $1.947 $312 L&N UNIFORM SUPPLY COMPANY,I NC.(CLEAN) 1.0595 3,053 3,736 $300 $582 S690 $1,571 $335 $711 $860 $1,906 $335 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO.,INC. 1.4976 3,122 3.122 $424 $595 $576 $1,595 $474 $728 $719 $1,920 $325 ALLIED PACIFIC METAL STAMPING 0.6675 5,079 2,166 $189 $968 S400 $1,557 $211 $1,183 $498 $1,893 $336 MORTON INTERNATIONAL 3.5609 1,965 2,118 $1,007 $375 S391 $1,773 $1,127 $458 $487 $2,072 $299 ALMATRON ELECTRONICS,INC. 2.6648 2,557 2,073 $754 $487 $383 $1,624 $843 $596 $477 $1,916 $292 PRIME TECHNOLOGIES,INC. 3.7436 2,769 984 $1,059 $528 $182 $1,769 $1,184 $645 $226 $2,056 $287 CHROME TECHNOLOGY,INC. 3.7358 915 2.125 $1,057 $174 $392 $1,623 $1,182 $213 $489 $1.884 $261 BAZZ HOUSTON CO. 3,3170 1,859 1,690 $938 $354 $312 $1,605 $1,049 $433 $389 $1,872 $267 VERTEQ PROCESS SYSTEMS INC. 2.0404 2,541 2,575 $577 $484 $475 $1.537 $646 $592 $593 $1,830 $293 MASK TECHNOLOGY INC. 1.6123 3,287 2,296 $456 $627 S424 $1.507 $510 $766 $528 $1,804 $298 CENTURY CIRCUIT SERVICES 4.1890 679 1,608 $1,185 $129 $297 $1,611 $1,325 $158 $370 $1,854 $242 MILBANK WEST INC. 1.8327 2.525 2,321 $519 $481 S428 $1,428 $580 $588 $534 $1,702 $274 G:lexcel.dtatfint210lstreedlold d copy\STRATPLNt2003-04 permit users for AR.As high to 10W 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 7 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B c D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg SOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase EXCELLO CIRCUITS MANUFACTURING CORP. 3.9787 1,684 465 $1,126 $321 $86 $1,533 $1,259 $392 $107 $1,758 $226 TRIM-LOK/R.T.P. 3.4401 1,376 1,376 $973 $262 S254 $1,490 $1,088 $321 $317 $1,726 $236 T R W-LUCAS AEROSPACE,BREA 1.6926 2,536 2,382 $479 $483 $440 $1,402 $536 $591 $548 $1,675 $273 SOUTH COAST CIRCUITS#2 2.1332 977 3,296 $604 $186 5608 $1,398 $675 $228 $758 $1,661 $263 SUNCLIPSE INC. 1.2486 3,335 2,031 $353 $636 S375 $1,364 $395 $777 $468 $1,640 $276 INTERCEM CORPORATION 1.0544 3.797 1,801 $298 $724 S332 $1,355 $334 $885 $414 $1,633 $278 CITY OF TUSTIN,WATER SERVICE(MAIN ST.) 5.5262 19 433 $1.563 $4 $80 $1,647 $1.748 $4 $100 $1,852 $205 GOLDENWEST LAUNDRY&VALET SERVICES INC 4.7161 489 489 $1,334 $93 $90 $1,518 $1.492 $114 $112 $1,718 $201 WATER MAN 5.0813 230 230 $1,438 $44 $43 $1,524 $1,608 $54 $53 $1,714 $190 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC. 1.3798 2,820 2.228 $390 $538 S411 $1,339 $437 $657 $513 $1,606 $267 WEBER PRECISION GRAPHICS 1.0879 4,368 971 $308 $833 S179 $1,320 $344 $1,018 $224 $1.585 $266 ULTRA PURE METAL FINISHING,INC. 3.7257 471 1,376 $1.054 $90 S254 $1,398 $1.179 $110 $317 $1,605 $207 BRIGHT ARMOUR PLATING 3.6804 275 1,607 $1.041 $52 $297 $1,390 $1,164 $64 $370 $1,698 $208 ANAHEIM PLATING&POLISHING INC. 3.4187 1.403 749 $967 $268 $138 $1,373 $1,082 $327 $172 $1,581 $208 SOUTH COAST CIRCUITS,INC. 2.4427 1,707 1,547 $691 $325 S285 $1,302 $773 $398 $356 $1,526 $225 CYTEC FIBERITE INC.-MIX HOUSE 1,2172 2,372 2,380 $344 $452 S439 $1,236 $385 $553 $548 $1.486 $250 FOAMEX L.P. 1.1950 2,384 2.394 $338 $455 $442 $1,234 $378 $555 $551 $1,484 $250 CANNON EQUIPMENT WEST INC. 1.8547 1,863 1,986 $525 $355 S367 $1,247 $587 $434 $457 $1,478 $232 NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY 2.7022 2,002 818 $765 $382 S151 $1.297 $855 $466 $188 $1,510 $213 BOND TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1.8748 1.903 1,903 $530 $363 S351 $1,244 $593 $443 $438 $1,474 $230 CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES,INC. 2.1650 780 2,340 $613 $149 S432 $1,193 $685 $182 $538 $1,405 $212 ESSEX GROUP INC. 1.6026 1,888 1,957 $453 $360 S361 $1,175 $507 $440 $450 $1,397 $223 RAYNE WATER SYSTEMS 3.8155 230 1,219 $1,079 $44 $225 $1,348 $1,207 $54 $281 $1,541 $193 SCIENTIFIC SPRAY FINISHES,INC. 1.7541 2.396 1.162 $496 $457 $214 $1,168 $555 $558 $267 $1,381 $213 AMERIMAX BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. 2.5048 544 1.943 $709 $104 S359 $1,171 $792 $127 $447 $1,366 $195 ALL METALS PROCESSING OF O.C.INC. 1.0400 2,168 2,168 $294 $413 $400 $1,108 $329 $505 $499 $1,333 $225 LEACH INTERNATIONAL 2.4050 707 1.860 $680 $135 S343 $1,158 $761 $165 $428 $1,354 $195 CLASSIC PLATING INC. 3.2568 777 649 $921 $148 S120 $1.189 $1,030 $181 $149 $1,361 $171 GRAPHIC PACKAGING CORP. 0.9828 2,047 2,048 $278 $390 $378 $1,046 $311 $477 $471 $1,259 $213 Y2K TEXTILE CO.,INC. 0.9818 2,047 2,047 $278 $390 $378 $1,046 $311 $477 $471 $1,259 $213 CARTEL ELECTRONICS 2.4280 1.486 746 $687 $283 S138 $1,108 $768 $346 $172 $1,286 $178 CAL-TRONICS CIRCUIT INC.-SANTAANA 2.0917 2,301 274 $592 $439 $51 $1.081 $662 $536 $63 $1,261 $180 ALLOY DIE CASTING CO. 1.0518 1,907 1,894 $298 $364 $349 $1,011 $333 $444 $436 $1,213 $202 TRIPLE A CONTAINERS INC. 0.5148 1,069 3,295 $146 $204 $608 $958 $163 $249 $758 $1,170 $213 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMEN 2.3159 1,217 946 $655 $232 $175 $1,062 $733 $284 $218 $1,234 $172 HIGHTOWER PLATING&MANUFACTURING CO. 2.6995 117 1,462 $764 $22 $270 $1,056 $854 $27 $336 $1,218 $162 GUNTHER ATHLETIC SERVICE 1.7949 1,317 1,329 $508 $251 $245 $1,004 $568 $307 $306 $1,181 $176 ELECTROSERVICES 2000 INC. 2.9695 887 163 $840 $169 $30 $1,039 $939 $207 $38 $1,184 $144 TRI-STAR ENGINEERED PRODUCTS,INC. 1.7283 1,942 632 $489 $370 $117 $976 $547 $452 $146 $1,145 $169 BALI OIL COMPANY 2.8369 0 1,136 $803 $0 S210 $1,012 $898 $0 $261 $1.159 $147 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.#2 2.0580 1.220 1,220 $582 $233 $225 $1,040 $651 $284 $281 $1,216 $176 KRYLER CORPORATION 3.2167 338 338 $910 $64 $62 $1,037 $1,018 $79 $78 $1,174 $137 G:lexcel.dtaUin12101streeMold d copylSTRATPLN12003-04 permit users for AR.x1s high t0 IOW 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 8 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003.04 Increase KODAK PROCESSING LABS 0.8625 1,798 1,798 $244 $343 $332 $919 $273 $419 $414 $1,106 $187 TIODIZE COMPANY,INC. 2.9349 488 488 $830 $93 $90 $1,013 $929 $114 $112 $1,155 $141 A S M COMPANY INC. 0.8253 1,721 1.721 $233 $328 $318 $879 $261 $401 $396 $1,058 $179 GARG-OIL PRODUCTION LLC 3.5859 0 0 $1,015 $0 $0 $1,015 $1,135 $0 $0 $1,135 $120 SOLDER STATION ONE INC.-EAST 2.7311 898 143 $773 $171 $26 $970 $864 $209 $33 $1,106 $136 ANAHEIM EXTRUSION CO.INC. 1.5997 1.105 1,319 $453 $211 $243 $907 $506 $257 $304 $1,067 $160 SEMICOA SEMICONDUCTORS 1.3688 1.471 1,426 $387 $280 $263 $931 $433 $343 $328 $1,104 $173 AUTO-CHLOR SYSTEM OF WASHINGTON,INC. 0.1336 4,080 87 $38 $778 $16 $832 $42 $951 $20 $1,013 $181 1 T T JABSCO PRODUCTS 0.7813 1,629 1,629 $221 $311 $301 $832 $247 $380 $375 $1,002 $169 LINCO INDUSTRIES INC. 0.9672 93 2.803 $274 $18 $517 $809 $306 $22 $645 $973 $164 PAYTON TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.8051 1,564 1,568 $228 $298 $289 $815 $255 $364 $361 $980 $165 CRAZY SHIRTS INC. 0.8125 1,694 1,694 $230 $323 $313 $865 $257 $395 $390 $1,042 $176 ORANGE CONTAINER,INC. 0.7307 1,246 1,946 $207 $238 $359 $803 $231 $290 $448 $969 $166 P C E INDUSTRY,INC. 1.0332 613 2,109 $292 $117 $389 $798 $327 $143 $485 $955 $157 SOUTH BAY CHROME SALES/CHROME EFFECTS 2.1373 688 688 $605 $131 $127 $863 $676 $160 $158 $995 $132 DUNHAM METAL PROCESSING 0.9162 762 1,983 $259 $145 $366 $770 $290 $177 $456 $924 $153 CADILLAC PLATING 2.0139 817 592 $570 $156 $109 $835 $637 $190 $136 $964 $129 PICOFARAD INC. 0.9541 1,047 1,657 $270 $200 $306 $775 $302 $244 $381 $927 $152 LINDBERG HEAT TREATING CO.-ALUMATHERM 0.7524 1,425 1,408 $213 $272 $260 $744 $238 $332 $324 $894 $150 OLYMPIC POWDER COATINGS INC. 1.5126 945 915 $428 $180 $169 $777 $479 $220 $211 $909 $132 REID METAL FINISHING 1.4669 1,381 547 $415 $263 $101 $779 $464 $322 $126 $912 $132 ALLTEK CIRCUIT INC. 2.0473 967 447 $579 $184 $82 $846 $648 $225 $103 $976 $130 NEWPORT METAL FINISHING INC. 1.2127 1,063 1,134 $343 $203 $209 $755 $384 $248 $261 $892 $137 R T I ELECTRONICS,INC. 0.6777 1,410 1,409 $192 $269 $260 $721 $214 $328 $324 $867 $147 QUALITY ALUMINUM FORGE 0.7280 1,361 1,391 $206 $259 $257 $722 $230 $317 $320 $868 $145 SECHRIST INDUSTRIES,INC. 0.6640 1,354 1,380 $188 $258 $255 $701 $210 $315 $318 $843 $142 S D C CIRCUITS 1.6588 1,141 364 $469 $218 $67 $754 $525 $266 $84 $875 $120 HARBOR TRUCK BODIES INC. 0.7093 1,375 1,286 $201 $262 $237 $700 $224 $320 $296 $841 $141 1 C N BIOMEDICALS,INC. 2.3262 407 407 $658 $78 $75 $811 $736 $95 $94 $924 $114 MILLETT INDUSTRIES 0.9839 1,643 616 $278 $313 $114 $705 $311 $383 $142 $836 $131 STAINLESS MICRO-POLISH INC. 1.9255 551 508 $545 $105 $94 $743 $609 $128 $117 $854 $111 PLEGEL OIL COMPANY(BLATTNER-A.H.A.) 2.4323 203 223 $688 $39 $41 $768 $770 $47 $51 $868 $100 F M H INVESTORS GROUP 1.2105 1,101 1,039 $342 $210 $192 $744 $383 $257 $239 $879 $135 DANONE WATERS OF N.A.-SANTA ANA 0.6250 1,303 1,303 $177 $248 $240 $666 $198 $304 $300 $801 $136 CROCKETT CONTAINER CORP. 0.6175 1.287 1,287 $175 $245 $238 $658 $195 $300 $296 $792 $134 ANAHEIM TRUCK DEPOT#2 BIN WASH 0.6163 1,285 1,285 $174 $245 $237 $656 $195 $299 $296 $790 $134 LAM LIGHTING INC. 0.6796 1,254 1,214 $192 $239 $224 $655 $215 $292 $279 $786 $131 CUSTOM ENAMELERS INC. 1.1852 790 1,037 $335 $151 $191 $677 $375 $164 $239 $798 $120 GRANT PISTON RINGS DIV.OF FRON 0.6018 1,249 1,246 $170 $238 $230 $638 $190 $291 $287 $768 $130 KINSBURSKY BROTHERS SUPPLY INC. 0.9982 948 1,032 $282 $181 $191 $654 $316 $221 $238 $774 $121 ELECTRORACK PRODUCTS CO.INC. 0.5685 1,288 1,161 $161 $245 $214 $621 $180 $300 $267 $747 $126 A&A DEBURRING&TUMBLING INC. 0.4257 1,444 1,182 $120 $275 $218 $614 $135 $336 $272 $743 $129 G:lexcel.dtaViM\210\streedlold d nopylSTRATPLN12003-04 permit users for AR.xls high to Ibw 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 9 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Val Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase DITTY DRUM COMPANY,INC. 1.5734 225 911 $445 $43 $168 $656 $498 $52 $210 $760 $104 DATA SOLDER SERVICES 1.2748 1,377 136 $361 $263 $25 $648 $403 $321 $31 $755 $107 SANMINA CORPORATION 2.0469 109 392 $579 $21 $72 $672 $648 $26 $90 $763 $91 NEWPORT PRECISION OPTICS CORP. 0.7966 996 1,054 $225 $190 $194 $610 $252 $232 $243 $727 $117 GARDNER LITHOGRAPH,INC. 1.3430 685 685 $380 $131 $126 $637 $425 $159 $158 $742 $105 GALLADE CHEMICAL INC. 1.3717 299 1,013 $388 $57 $187 $632 $434 $70 $233 $737 $105 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.#1 0.5850 1.220 1,220 $166 $233 $225 $623 $185 $284 $281 $750 $127 H.KOCH&SONS COMPANY 1.4306 587 587 $405 $112 $108 $625 $453 $137 $135 $724 $99 PRECISION PAINTING 0.8738 830 1,002 $247 $158 $185 $590 $276 $193 $231 $700 $110 CEROMET INC. 0.5332 1,112 1.112 $151 $212 $205 $568 $169 $259 $256 $684 $116 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 2.2632 14 14 $640 $3 $3 $645 $716 $3 $3 $722 $77 SANMINA CORPORATION(AIRWAY) 0.5200 1.084 1,084 $147 $207 $200 $554 $165 $253 $250 $667 $113 SANMINA CORPORATION(REDHILL) 0.5200 1,084 1,084 $147 $207 $200 $554 $165 $253 $250 $667 $113 MEDEVA PHARMACEUTICALS CA,INC. 1.0737 864 606 $304 $165 $112 $580 $340 $201 $140 $681 $100 GEORGE A.JONES,IMPERIAL#2 WELL 1.5136 341 555 $428 $65 $103 $596 $479 $79 $128 $686 $90 FINELINE CIRCUITS&TECHNOLOGY INC. 0.8123 1.438 334 $230 $274 $62 $565 $257 $335 $77 $669 $103 LACEY CUSTOM LINENS 1.0565 952 426 $299 $181 $79 $559 $334 $222 $98 $654 $95 SUPERIOR FORGE INC. 1.0513 672 672 $297 $128 S124 $550 $333 $157 $155 $644 $94 LOS ALAMITOS ECONO-WASH 2.0842 0 0 $590 $0 $0 $590 $659 $0 $0 $659 $70 NOLLAC OIL COMPANY 1.7580 88 279 $497 $17 $51 $566 $556 $20 $64 $641 $75 AVIATION EQUIPMENT STRUCTURES,INC. 0.5027 1,048 1,048 $142 $200 S193 $535 $159 $244 $241 $644 $109 H.B.OIL OPERATIONS TRUST 0.8317 874 555 $235 $167 $102 $504 $263 $204 $128 $594 $90 LA HABRA PLATING CO.INC. 1.8453 81 81 $522 $16 $15 $553 $584 $19 $19 $621 $69 DAE SHIN USA,INC. 0.4500 938 938 $127 $179 $173 $479 $142 $219 $216 $577 $98 BASIC ELECTRONICS,INC. 0.5150 1,455 364 $146 $277 $67 $490 $163 $339 $84 $586 $95 TROY SYSTEMS INC. 0.4900 980 977 $139 $187 $180 $506 $155 $228 $225 $608 $102 SUPERIOR PLATING 1.3786 363 312 $390 $69 $58 $517 $436 $85 $72 $592 $76 THERMAL-VAC TECHNOLOGY 1.2684 119 675 $359 $23 $125 $506 $401 $28 $155 $584 $78 UNITED CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY INC. 0.7023 929 521 $199 $177 $96 $472 $222 $216 $120 $559 $87 GENERAL ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL INC. 0.8276 628 628 $234 $120 $116 $470 $262 $146 $144 $553 $83 JELLCO CONTAINER INC. 0.4160 867 867 $118 $165 $160 $443 $132 $202 $200 $533 $90 SOUTH COAST OIL CORPORATION 1.7892 0 0 $506 $0 $0 $506 $566 $0 $0 $566 $60 MONARCH PRECISION DEBURRING COMPANY 1.4173 217 217 $401 $41 $40 $482 $448 $51 $50 $549 $66 CAPRO OIL COMPANY 1.7514 0 0 $496 $0 $0 $496 $554 $0 $0 $554 $59 GENERAL CONTAINER CORPORATION 0.4397 829 739 $124 $158 S136 $419 $139 $193 $170 $502 $84 IMPERIAL CONTAINERS&DISPLAY INC. 0.3601 707 934 $102 $135 S172 $409 $114 $165 $215 $494 $85 MARK OPTICS INC. 0.3432 435 1,139 $97 $83 $210 $390 $109 $101 $262 $472 $82 AQUA-CON COMPANY 1.2147 52 429 $344 $10 $79 $433 $384 $12 $99 $495 $62 ELECTRON PLATING III INC. 0.9713 210 566 $275 $40 S104 $419 $307 $49 $130 $487 $67 PERFORMANCE POWDER,INC. 0.8223 519 415 $233 $99 $77 $408 $260 $121 $96 $477 $68 ROCK INDUSTRIES,INC. 0,4399 1.094 320 $124 $209 $59 $392 $139 $255 $74 $468 $76 CHEEK ENGINEERING&STAMPING 0.7028 879 298 $199 $168 $55 $421 $222 $205 $69 $496 $74 G:\exce1.dta\fin\210\s1reed\o1d d copy\STRATPLN\2003-04 permit users for AR.As high to IOW 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 10 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs lbs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase PRECON,INC. 0.3773 1,016 421 $107 $194 $78 $378 $119 $237 $97 $453 $75 SELECT CIRCUITS 1.2177 190 190 $345 $36 $35 $416 $385 $44 $44 $473 $57 AQUARIAN COATINGS CORPORATION 0.7831 546 320 $222 $104 $59 $385 $248 $127 $74 $449 $64 CIRCUIT TECH INC. 0.7505 457 437 $212 $87 $81 $380 $237 $107 $100 $444 $64 DATA AIRE INC.#2 0.3250 678 678 $92 $129 S125 $346 $103 $158 $156 $417 $70 SOUTH COAST CIRCUITS#3 0.3250 678 678 $92 $129 S125 $346 $103 $158 $156 $417 $70 PRECISION CIRCUITS WEST INC. 1.0045 248 248 $284 $47 $46 $377 $318 $58 $57 $433 $55 SOLDERMASK,INC. 0.6405 509 429 $181 $97 $79 $357 $203 $119 $99 $420 $63 HIGH TECH COATINGS,INC.SF 0.3259 966 346 $92 $184 $64 $340 $103 $225 $80 $408 $68 CRITERION MACHINE WORKS 0.4363 573 573 $123 $109 S106 $339 $138 $134 $132 $404 $65 RIGIFLEX TECHNOLOGY INC. 0.8303 352 265 $235 $67 $49 $351 $263 $82 $61 $406 $55 INDEPENDENT FORGE 0.3000 626 626 $85 $119 $115 $320 $95 $146 $144 $385 $65 P T C INDUSTRIES,INC. 0.4004 642 444 $113 $122 $82 $318 $127 $150 $102 $379 $61 KENLEN SPECIALITIES INC. 0.5690 410 420 $161 $78 $77 $317 $180 $96 $97 $372 $56 ALLOY TECH ELECTROPOLISHING INC. 0.6806 250 433 $193 $48 $80 $320 $215 $58 $100 $373 $53 SPIVECO,INC. 0.3017 868 299 $85 $165 $55 $306 $95 $202 $69 $366 $60 CEMPI INDUSTRIES INC. 0.3092 560 560 $87 $107 S103 $298 $98 $131 $129 $357 $60 1 P C CAL FLEX INC. 0.2756 575 575 $78 $110 S106 $294 $87 $134 $132 $353 $60 PACIFIC UTILITY PRODUCTS INC. 0.6225 358 354 $176 $68 $65 $310 $197 $83 $81 $362 $52 ALTA BELLWOOD HOSPITALS INC. 0.2738 571 571 $77 $109 S105 $292 $87 $133 $131 $351 $59 SHIPLEY COMPANY LLC 0.2678 558 558 $76 $106 S103 $285 $85 $130 $129 $343 $58 DANONE WATERS OF N.A.-ANAHEIM 0.2656 554 554 $75 $106 S102 $283 $84 $129 $127 $341 $58 POWDERCOAT SERVICES INC.#4 0.5310 299 458 $150 $57 $85 $292 $168 $70 $105 $343 $51 VICTORY CIRCUITS INC. 0.3460 820 155 $98 $156 $29 $283 $109 $191 $36 $336 $53 LOGI GRAPHICS,INC. 0.6583 295 179 $186 $56 $33 $275 $208 $69 $41 $318 $43 POWDERCOAT SERVICES INC.#3 0.6253 214 270 $177 $41 $50 $267 $198 $50 $62 $310 $42 A R O SERVICE 0.2275 474 474 $64 $90 $88 $242 $72 $111 $109 $292 $49 J-TRON INC. 0.2781 628 198 $79 $120 $37 $235 $88 $146 $46 $280 $45 D&S CUSTOM PLATING INC. 0.3964 271 375 $112 $52 $69 $233 $125 $63 $86 $275 $42 ADVANCE TECH PLATING INC. 0.5553 285 134 $157 $54 $25 $236 $176 $67 $31 $273 $37 PRECISION POWDERCOATING INC. 0.2503 569 226 $71 $109 $42 $221 $79 $133 $52 $264 $43 PRECIOUS METALS PLATING 0.5944 160 190 $168 $30 $35 $234 $188 $37 $44 $269 $35 CENTRAL POWDER COATING 0.4486 295 232 $127 $56 $43 $226 $142 $69 $53 $264 $38 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 0,1994 416 416 $56 $79 $77 $212 $63 $97 $96 $256 $43 WILLIAM J.SCOTT 0.8319 0 0 $235 $0 $0 $235 $263 $0 $0 $263 $28 M.S.BELLOWS 0.1895 531 265 $54 $101 $49 $204 $60 $124 $61 $245 $41 SOUTH COAST OIL COMPANY 0.5116 98 277 $145 $19 $51 $215 $162 $23 $64 $249 $34 NUEVO ENERGY COMPANY(H.B.) 0.2864 284 302 $81 $54 $56 $191 $91 $66 $70 $226 $35 HIGH-TECH COATINGS,INC. 0.2154 484 189 $61 $92 $35 $188 $68 $113 $44 $225 $36 J&H DEBURRING INC.#2 0.1690 352 352 $48 $87 $65 $180 $53 $82 $81 $217 $37 SANTANA SERVICES 0.4684 34 275 $133 $7 $51 $190 $148 $8 $63 $220 $30 IMPERIAL PLATING 0.6530 12 61 $185 $2 $11 $198 $207 $3 $14 $223 $25 G:lexcel.dtaVin12101streedtold d copy\STRATPLN12003-04 permit users for AR.xls high to low 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 11 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase K C A ELECTRONICS,INC. 0.1560 325 325 $44 $62 $60 $166 $49 $76 $75 $200 $34 A&R POWDER COATING INC. 0.4238 127 184 $120 $24 $34 $178 $134 $30 $42 $206 $28 ELECTRO METAL FINISHING CORPORATION 0.1652 327 303 $47 $62 $56 $165 $52 $76 $70 $198 $33 TRANSLINE TECHNOLOGY INC. 0.4246 150 150 $120 $29 $26 $176 $134 $35 $35 $204 $27 IRVINE SENSORS CORP. 0.2822 263 263 $80 $50 $48 $178 $89 $61 $60 $211 $33 E F T FAST QUALITY SERVICE,INC. 0.3956 257 65 $112 $49 $12 $173 $125 $60 $15 $200 $27 A&G ELECTROPOLISH 0.3143 234 174 $89 $45 $32 $166 $99 $55 $40 $194 $28 MORAVEK BIOCHEMICALS INC. 0.3247 196 196 $92 $37 $36 $165 $103 $46 $45 $193 $28 STRIP CLEAN COMPANY 0.5621 59 12 $159 $11 $2 $172 $178 $14 $3 $194 $22 HOANG CLEANERS 0.6147 0 0 $174 $0 $0 $174 $194 $0 $0 $194 $21 PIER OIL COMPANY 0.6124 0 0 $173 $0 $0 $173 $194 $0 $0 $194 $20 K SOLDERING,INC.DBA QUALITY SOLDERING 0.4067 139 113 $115 $26 $21 $162 $129 $32 $26 $187 $25 POWDERCOAT SERVICES INC.#1 0.1462 279 280 $41 $53 $52 $146 $46 $65 $64 $176 $29 POWDERCOAT SERVICES INC.#2 0.1316 274 274 $37 $52 $51 $140 $42 $64 $63 $169 $29 BOEING COMPANY-BLDG.271 0.4440 35 100 $126 $7 $19 $151 $140 $8 $23 $172 $21 ROTO-DIE COMPANY INC. 0.1941 203 203 $55 $39 $38 $131 $61 $47 $47 $156 $24 BASIN MARINE INC. 0.1188 248 248 $34 $47 $46 $127 $38 $58 $57 $152 $26 RENAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE,LLC 0.1170 244 244 $33 $47 $45 $125 $37 $57 $56 $150 $25 SIERRA SPRING WATER COMPANY 0.1170 244 244 $33 $47 $45 $125 $37 $57 $56 $150 $25 O'DONNELL OIL COMPANY 0.4631 0 0 $131 $0 $0 $131 $147 $0 $0 $147 $15 NUEVO ENERGY COMPANY(BREA) 0.1027 214 214 $29 $41 $40 $109 $32 $50 $49 $132 $22 SUPERIOR PROCESSING 0.3279 86 93 $93 $16 $17 $126 $104 $20 $21 $145 $19 SOUTH COAST WATER 0.1014 211 211 $29 $40 $39 $108 $32 $49 $49 $130 $22 RAILMAKERS,INC. 0.0975 203 203 $28 $39 $38 $104 $31 $47 $47 $125 $21 WINTEC,LLC 0.0995 207 207 $28 $40 $38 $106 $31 $48 $48 $128 $22 M T S MICROELECTRONICS INC. 0.0855 178 178 $24 $34 $33 $91 $27 $42 $41 $110 $19 ALL METAL PAINT STRIPPING INC.#2 0.0465 146 244 $13 $28 $45 $86 $15 $34 $56 $105 $19 UNITED CUSTOM POLISHING&PLATING 0.1444 113 156 $41 $21 $29 $91 $46 $26 $36 $108 $17 AERA ENERGY LLC#2 0.0821 171 171 $23 $33 $32 $87 $26 $40 $39 $105 $18 EXQUISITE DESIGNS INC. 0.3086 27 27 $87 $5 $5 $97 $98 $6 $6 $110 $13 ENGINEERING PLATING CORPORATION 0.3333 8 8 $94 $1 $1 $97 $105 $2 $2 $109 $12 NU-TEC POWDER COATING 0.0780 163 163 $22 $31 $30 $83 $25 $38 $37 $100 $17 COLUMBINE ASSOCIATES 0.2837 0 0 $80 $0 $0 $80 $90 $0 $0 $90 $9 J K L MANUFACTURING INC.#2 0.1404 143 37 $40 $27 $7 $74 $44 $33 $8 $86 $12 TECHPLATE ENGINEERING CO.INC. 0.0604 104 135 $17 $20 $25 $62 $19 $24 $31 $74 $13 OLIVE OIL CO. 0.1207 76 76 $34 $15 $14 $63 $38 $18 $18 $73 $11 SHERWIN D.YOELIN 0.2114 19 19 $60 $4 $4 $67 $67 $4 $4 $76 $9 S F P P,L.P. 0.0548 114 114 $16 $22 $21 $58 $17 $27 $26 $70 $12 TOWN&COUNTRY LAUNDRY 0.2237 0 0 $63 $0 $0 $63 $71 $0 $0 $71 $7 LAM-PLATE TECH INC. 0.1378 53 53 $39 $10 $10 $59 $44 $12 $12 $68 $9 ARCO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS COMPANY 0.0548 104 104 $16 $20 $19 $55 $17 $24 $24 $66 $11 PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY,INC. 0.0703 93 93 $20 $18 $17 $55 $22 $22 $21 $65 $11 G:\exceI.dta\fln\21oXstreed\o1d d copy\STRATPLN\2003-04 permit users for AR.xls high to low 5/14/2003 Rate Change Impact on Permit Users Page 12 of 12 2000-01 Quantities,2002-03 Rates and 2003-04 Rates Before Credits for Property Taxes or Sewer Service Fees A B C D E F G H I J K L Total Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Vol Chg BOD Chg TSS Chg Volume Total BOD Total TSS 2002-3 2002-3 2002-3 Total Chg 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 Total Chg Total COMPANY NAME MG Ibs Ibs $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 2002-3 $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 2003-04 Increase PETROPRIZE 0.1966 0 0 $56 $0 $0 $56 $62 $0 $0 $62 $7 HUNTINGTON GARDENS CENTER 0.1840 0 0 $52 $0 $0 $52 $58 $0 $0 $58 $6 CIRCUITACCESS 0.0406 85 85 $11 $16 $16 $43 $13 $20 $19 $52 $9 ALEXANDER OIL COMPANY 0.1760 0 0 $50 $0 $0 $50 $56 $0 $0 $56 $6 WESCO SERVICES 0.0631 94 54 $18 $18 $10 $46 $20 $22 $12 $54 $9 PURE-CHEM PRODUCTS COMPANY INC. 0.0355 73 73 $10 $14 $14 $38 $11 $17 $17 $45 $8 COIN LAUNDRY C/O FRANZ LIEM 0.1505 0 0 $43 $0 $0 $43 $48 $0 $0 $48 $5 BRINDLE/THOMAS 0.1460 0 0 $41 $0 $0 $41 $46 $0 $0 $46 $5 ADVANCE TECH PLATING INC.#2 0.0330 69 69 $9 $13 $13 $35 $10 $16 $16 $42 $7 ACROBURR INC.#2 0.0707 43 45 $20 $8 $8 $37 $22 $10 $10 $43 $6 MUNOZ COIN LAUNDRY 0.1375 0 0 $39 $0 $0 $39 $44 $0 $0 $44 $5 ENGRAVERS INK CO 0.0554 32 65 $16 $6 $12 $34 $18 $7 $15 $40 $6 X Z X ELECTRONICS 0.0552 41 41 $16 $8 $8 $31 $17 $9 $9 $36 $5 CIRCUIT CENTER 0.1065 6 6 $30 $1 $1 $32 $34 $1 $1 $36 $4 HANSON-LORAN CO.,INC. 0.0260 54 54 $7 $10 $10 $28 $8 $13 $12 $33 $6 WALKER CUSTOM COATING 0.0252 53 53 $7 $10 $10 $27 $8 $12 $12 $32 $5 HI-TECH STENCILS 0.0278 50 51 $8 $10 $9 $27 $9 $12 $12 $32 $5 CITY OF TUSTIN-MAINTENANCE YARD 0.0211 44 44 $6 $8 $8 $22 $7 $10 $10 $27 $5 EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC 0.0212 39 39 $6 $7 $7 $21 $7 $9 $9 $25 $4 GOMTECH ELECTRONICS 0.0163 34 34 $5 $6 $6 $17 $5 $8 $8 $21 $4 VEECO ELECTRO FAB INC.#2 0.0169 30 27 $5 $6 $5 $16 $5 $7 $6 $19 $3 SIGNAL ASSOCIATES 0.0615 0 0 $17 $0 $0 $17 $19 $0 $0 $19 $2 STAR POWDER COATING 0.0198 17 12 $6 $3 $2 $11 $6 $4 $3 $13 $2 S&C OIL CORPORATION 0.0255 0 0 $7 $0 $0 $7 $8 $0 $0 $8 $1 K J ENTERPRISES,LLC 0.0180 0 0 $5 $0 $0 $5 $6 $0 $0 $0 $1 W.M.ELLIOTT 0.0174 0 0 $5 $0 $0 $5 $6 $0 $0 $6 $1 WILVIAN JEWELL RENNER 0.0032 0 0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 Total 6,821 20,775,456 8,332,938 $1.929,763 $3,960,841 $1.537,844 $7,428,448 $2.157.990 $4,840,681 $1,917,742 $8,916,414 $1,487,966 Average per Permit User 14 42,486 17,041 $3.946 $8,100 $3,145 $15.191 $4,413 $9,899 $3,922 $18,234 $3,043 Average per day 19 56,919 22.830 $5,287 $10,852 $4,213 $20,352 $5,912 $13,262 $5,254 $247429 $4,077 G:%excel.dta1fin12101streed1old d copylSTRATPLN12003-04 permit users for AR.xls high to IOW ORDINANCE NO. OCSD -20 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING REVISED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES; ADOPTING REVISED CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES; REAFFIRMING ESTABLISHED MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL CHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS; AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-18 and OCSD-19 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ("District') has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-18, establishing annual Sewer Service Charges for all uses, establishing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges to be imposed when properties either newly-connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District; establishing miscellaneous industrial discharger fees, source control/non-compliance sampling fees, and wastehauler charges, which Ordinance is presently in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, for purposes of improved efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations, it is the intent, by the adoption of this Ordinance, to re-enact the existing Ordinances that establish fees and charges, and to provide for certain increases in certain sewer service charges and capital facilities fees. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: Section I. Fees and Charges Ordinance—Adopted TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I: RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01, Findings— Declaration of Intent ARTICLE Il: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01, Purpose and Scope Section 2.02, Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge Section 2.03 A. Exemptions B. Application for Rebate C. Application for Refund D. Limitation Period E. Determination WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 1 - F. Administrative Fee Section 2.04, Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year Section 2.05, Method of Collection Section 2.06, Credit for Industrial Permittees Table A Annual Sewer Service Charges for Residential Users Table B Annual Sewer Service Charges Property Use Classifications for Commercial or Industrial Users ARTICLE III: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Section 3.01, Purpose and Scope Section 3.02, Definitions Section 3.03, Connection Permits: Required Section 3.04, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Section 3.05, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment Section 3.06, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts Section 3.07, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial — Industrial Users— Special Purpose Dischargers— Definitions Section 3.08, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial — Industrial Users Section 3.09, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Purpose Dischargers Section 3.10, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users— Special Purpose Dischargers Table C Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Section 3.11, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Section 3.12, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Section 3.13, Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements Section 3.14, No Refund or Transfer Section 3.15, Baseline Transferability Table D Capital Facilities Capacity Charges WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 2 - ARTICLE IV: MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01, Purpose and Scope Section 4.02, Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees Section 4.03, Industrial Discharger, Source Control, and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Section 4.04, Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use Section 4.05, Class I and Class II Permittees— Charges for Use Section 4.06, Wastehauler Charges for Use Section 4.07, Administrative Appeals Table E Administrative Fees and Charges Relating To Permittees Table F Industrial Discharger, Source Control and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Table G Class I and Class II Permittees and Special Purpose Discharge Permittees Charges For Use Table H Wastehauler Charges for Use ARTICLE V: MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01, Application of Ordinance Section 5.02, Exceptions Section 5.03, Severability Section 5.04, Effective Date Section 5.05, Repeal Section 5.06, Certification and Publication ARTICLE I RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01. Findings— Declaration of Intent. The Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Master Plans, as more particularly described in Findings B, C, D, and E below, setting forth the financial and engineering needs of the District, and hereby adopts the following Findings supporting the amounts of charges and fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. A. That the former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California (the "Predecessor Districts"), were nine individual County Sanitation Districts, organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). By WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 3 - action of the Board of Directors of the Predecessor Districts, pursuant to specific legislation enacted by the California State Legislature in 1996, an application was submitted to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission to legally consolidate the nine Predecessor Districts into one single Sanitation District for all purposes. The application was approved, with an effective date of July 1, 1998. As of July 1, 1998, the Predecessor Districts ceased to exist, and one single consolidated County Sanitation District, known as the Orange County Sanitation District, came into existence in place of the Predecessor Districts. The District was formed to carry on the functions of the Predecessor Districts. B. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities, entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan— 1989", hereinafter referred to as the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, was prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, setting forth and identifying the required future development of District Facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the individual service areas of each of the nine Predecessor Districts. C. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan were made available to the public, both prior to and subsequent to the adoption of the Master Plan, and were subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 66016, and other provisions of law. D. That the Predecessor Districts, during the years 1997 and 1998, commenced comprehensive planning, engineering, and financial studies to develop an updated Comprehensive Master Plan of Capital Facilities, which studies are referred to as the District's "Strategic Plan", which was approved and adopted by the Resolution No. 99-21 of Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. E. That the District, in 1997, as part of its Strategic Plan studies, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain access to the system. F. That in support of this Ordinance and the revised charges for sewer service and/or Capital Facilities Capacity Charges as provided for on Tables A, C, D and G herein, the Board of Directors finds that the Capital Improvement Program ("CIP") Validation Study for Fiscal year 2003-04 and the Secondary Treatment Peer Review, as approved by the Board of Directors, has resulted in the development of a capital improvement program that provides for WS&S-TLW:jIo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL -4- the implementation of secondary treatment standards, thereby improving effluent quality in a reasonably short period of time, consistent with the goals and policies of the board of Directors, the member agencies, and the public, while also providing for the construction of necessary improvements to accommodate projected increased flows and the rehabilitation and refurbishment of existing facilities. The Board further finds that programming annual adjustments in sewer service charges over a period of years is appropriate and ensures adequate revenues to finance the improvements and programs necessary to implement secondary treatment standards, accommodate increased flows, rehabilitate and refurbish existing facilities, and retire any necessary or prudent debt incurred to finance such improvements in a reasonable manner and over a reasonable period of time. The Board of Directors also finds that such Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Capital Facilities Capacity Charges are reasonably related to, and do not exceed the cost of providing sewer services. G. That the financial requirements of the District, as shown in reports prepared by Staff and Consultants relating to the Strategic Plan and the CIP validation studies, are based on current, reliable information and data relating to population projections, wastewater flow, and capital facilities' needs, and are expected to be realized in each year as described in the reports. H. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the sewage collection, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and to assist in the payment of costs to the District to provide all regulatory administration and laboratory services related to the industrial dischargers, source control permittees, and wastehauler users of the District's systems. I. That the owners or occupants of properties upon which all fees and charges established by this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process. J. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public health and safety, and to preserve the environment without damage. K. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established and levied by this Ordinance are to allow the District to recover the reasonable costs to provide a service to individual properties which have been improved for any of numerous types of uses. The basis for the respective charge is the request of WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 5 - the owner of property or a structure thereon, for the benefit of him/her/itself, or the occupants of the property, to receive a service based upon actual use, consumption, and disposal of water to the District's system in lieu of disposal by other means. L. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance are not imposed as a condition of approval of a development project, as defined in California Government Code Section 66001, and do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016 and California Constitution Article XIIID. M. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these Sanitary Sewer Service Charges will not result in any specific project, nor result in a direct physical change in the environment. N. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities provided to each new customer of the District, a portion of which are necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes to the State General Fund as a result of state legislative action on September 2, 1992, and in subsequent years. O. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinances, commencing in 1969, and most recently by Ordinance No. OCSD- 18, established Capital Facilities Connection Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges" or"fees", to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system. Said Charges are required as a financial payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the system, and for future facilities to be constructed. P. That the District's previous and present Capital Facilities Connection Charges Ordinances, include[d] authority for the District to levy an excess or supplemental capacity charge upon commercial and industrial users who discharge quantities or high strength wastewater greater than the established base line of authorized discharge. Q. That the Capital Facilities Connection Charges re-enacted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property or structure, by the District, within a given category. WS&S—TLWJIo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 6 - R. That the miscellaneous charges and fees re-enacted by this Ordinance without change are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged to each industrial discharger, source control permittee, or wastehauler and the service and facilities provided to each. S. That the District is required by federal and state law, including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq.), the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 C.F.R. 403), and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code Sections 13000 et seq.) to implement and enforce a program for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the District's sewers. T. That the District is required by federal, state and local law, to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality. U. That pursuant to these requirements, the Board of Directors has adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations. V. That the District incurs additional costs in conducting non- compliance sampling of those industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations and in administering the industrial, wastehauler, and special discharge permit programs. W. That Ordinance No OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, provides that the Board of Directors is to establish various fees and charges to recover those costs to the District which are made necessary by industrial dischargers and wastehaulers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. X. That the industrial discharger, source control, and wastehauler fees and charges hereby established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to the District of industrial discharger, source control, or wastehauler use of the District's facilities and for the administration and implementation of permit and fee processing, non-compliance sampling, and related services associated with the District's Source Control Program. Y. That all fees and charges established herein have been approved by the District's Board of Directors at a noticed public meeting, all in accordance with applicable provisions of law. Z. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). WS&S-TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 7- AA. That each of the Findings set forth in previous Ordinances Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSD-11, OCSD-13, OCSD-15, OCSD-18, and OCSD-19 are reaffirmed and readopted hereat, except to the extent that they have been specifically superseded or otherwise amended by specific Findings herein. ARTICLE II SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish Sanitary Sewer Service Charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 2.02. Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance, the owner of each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial, or industrial use and which, at the request of the owner or the owner's predecessor-in-interest, is connected to the District's system, shall pay an annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge based on the respective class of users, in the sum or sums, as set forth in Tables A and B of this Ordinance, below. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for residential users are set forth in Table A. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for commercial or industrial users are dependent upon the respective classifications of property use, determined by reference to Table B; the applicable percentage figure shown on Table B with respect to the particular use classification is multiplied by the applicable single family residential rate shown in Table A, to arrive at the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. Section 2.03. A. Exemptions. It is the intent of the District that the legal owner(s) of parcels of real property, otherwise subject to the levy and payment of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, as prescribed herein, be relieved, in whole or in part, from the payment of said charges, in certain circumstances and under conditions prescribed herein, and be entitled to either a rebate or a refund with respect to charges paid, as more specifically set forth in Subparagraphs 2.0313 and 2.03C below, provided an inequity is established or a billing error is proven, as specified in Subparagraphs B or C. WS&S-TLW:jIo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 8 - B. Application for Rebate. Any property owner may apply to the District for a rebate of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that an unfair valuation of the property has been made by the District. An applicant for a rebate must establish, by proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that an inequity exists between the amount of the charge paid and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system, resulting in an unfair valuation. Satisfactory proof shall establish that either: (1) The principal water use is agricultural or horticultural; or (2) The property is devoted to any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. Satisfactory proof shall include, but not be limited to, documentation showing actual water usage for each billing cycle during the entire period for which the rebate is sought. The amount of any rebate shall not reduce the charge payable by any property owner, whose property is connected to the District's system, to less than the single family residential charge shown on the applicable Table attached hereto. C. Application for Refund. Any property owner may apply to the District for a refund of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that the amount paid was pursuant to an error in the amount billed or the amount paid. The applicant for a refund must submit proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that a billing error has been made by the District, or the County Tax Collector. Such proof shall include, but not be limited to, proof that: (1) The owner's parcel of property is not connected to the District's system; or (2) The property has not been classified in the proper land use category; or (3) A clerical error has been made. D. Limitations Period. Applications for rebates and refunds shall be deemed to be governed by the provisions of California Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 5096 and 5097, allowing for refunds for a period of WS&S-TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 9 - four (4) years from the date of payment of the second installment of the bill claimed to be either inequitable or incorrect. E. Determination. All applications for rebates or refunds of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge will be determined by the General Manager of the District, or his designee, who, based on the submitted proof, may grant a full or partial rebate or refund. F. Administrative Fee. At the time of filing the application for rebate or refund, the property owner shall pay District an administrative fee for the processing of such application. The amount of the fee shall be equal to the total of all fees and charges imposed on the District by any other public entity, such as the Orange County Tax Collector, the Orange County Auditor, or the Orange County Recorder, in connection with the rebate or refund. Section 2.04. Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance shall be effective as of July 1 of each year, as set forth in Tables A and B, attached hereto, for the District's fiscal year, and shall remain in effect until such time as the rates adopted herein are changed by District Ordinance. There shall be no proration of such charges in any fiscal year. Section 2.05. Method of Collection. A. Pursuant to the authority granted by California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, and except as otherwise provided in Subparagraph 2.05B below, all sanitary sewer service charges established herein shall be collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with, and not separately from, its general taxes. The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to make said collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements between the County of Orange and the District. B. In the event District determines that, due to billing or payment error, or to inequity in the amount billed, a property owner has underpaid annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges payable to District, District, within four (4) years after the date of mailing of the tax bill, may: (1) collect the amount of any deficiency directly on the County Tax Roll; (2) off-set the amount of any deficiency against any amounts that District determines is owing, by District, to the property owner, as a rebate or refund under this Ordinance; or WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 10 - (3) submit, directly to the property owner, a bill for the amount of any deficiency, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the invoice date and which, if not paid, shall become a lien on said property. Section 2.06. Credit for Industrial Permittees. A credit shall be allowed to all dischargers permitted pursuant to Article 3 of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, in an amount equal to the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge established by Section 2.02 of this Ordinance, in the same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Sections 302.6(B), and 303.6(B) of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. TABLE A ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE USER FEES RESIDENTIAL USERS FISCAL YEAR 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 SFR $105.00 $126.00 $151.00 $181.00 $217.00 MFR $73.50 $88.20 $105.70 $126.70 $151.90 SFR = SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MFR = MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL All residential properties located within Revenue Area No. 14 pay no annual service fees. District costs relating to providing service to these properties are billed by OCSD directly to the Irvine Ranch Water District, the local agency providing the local sewer service. WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL TABLE B ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1.000 SF or Unit 1 Vacant Land Parcel 0% 5 Common Area Parcel 0% 6 "Hold" Parcel 0% 8 Equivalent to Vacant 0% 121 Parcel of Minimal or No Value 0% 122 Subsurface Parcels 0% 124 Oil/Mineral Rights 0% 125 Mineral Rights Equipment 0% 126 Vacant Comm. Area-IMP Alloc. 0% 201 Homeowners Exemption AddT 0% 666 Unassigned Vacant 0% 777 Septic Tank Property 0% 112 Steel Building 7% 113 Mini-Warehouse 7% 58 Nurseries (Plants) 10% 100 Drive-In Theater 10% 44 Lumber/Constr. Material Yard 17% 71 Parking Garage 17% 72 Paved Parking Lot 17% 110 Warehouse—Single Tenant 17% 111 Warehouse— Multi Tenant 17% 115 Recreational Vehicle Storage 17% 116 Truck Terminal 17% 33 Church Buildings 20% 94 Department Store 23% 95 Discount Store 23% 96 Unattached Single Store 23% 97 Strip Store 23% 74 Recreational Vehicle Park 27% 36 Financial Buildings 27% 40 Health Club 29% 68 High Rise Office 30% 21 Automobile Dealership 41% 22 Auto Repair Shop 41% 23 Automotive Service 41% 24 Used Car Lot 41% 39 Golf Course 41 57 Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building 41% 83 Automotive Service Station 41% WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 12 - TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 84 Marine Service Station 41% 86 Combin.-Service Station/Convenience 41% 65 Single Office Bldgs. to 3 Stories 41% 66 Small Office Center 41% 67 Office Complex 41% 69 Converted Residence to Office 41% 7 Mobile Home 50% 55 Mobile Home Park 50% 107 Light Industrial —Single Tenant 50% 108 Light Industrial—Multi Tenant 50% 109 Research and Development 50% 114 Industrial Park 50% 37 Fraternal Buildings 51% 101 Unattached Theater 51% 26 Airport and Related Buildings 53% 45 Marinas 53% 88 Low Flow Shopping Center 53% 3 Two or More Residences 70% 10 Duplex Only 70% 11 Triplex Only 70% 12 04-Units Only 70% 13 5 to 16 Units 70% 14 17 to 25 Units 70% 15 26 to 40 Units Only 70% 16 41-99 Units Only 70% 17 100 or More Units 70% 18 Developed with a Mix of Forms 70% 63 Low Rise Retirement Building 70% 64 High Rise Retirement Building 70% 81 Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care 82% 82 Private Schools 82% 98 Store with Offices or Living Quarter 82% 99 Store with Office Upstairs 82% 118 Governmental Use Vacant/Develop. 82% 19 SFR with 1 or 2 rental units 85% 34 Dormitory 97% 42 Hospital 97% 43 Hotel 97% 56 Motels and Motor Hotels 97% WS&S—TLW:jIo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 13 - TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 0 Conversion-C/1, Rural PC 100% 2 One Residence 100% 4 Miscellaneous Improvement 100% 85 Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant 100% 103 Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage 100% 104 Food Processing Plant 100% 105 Cold Storage Plant 100% 106 Factory 100% 119 Public Utility 100% 120 Water Mutual or Company 100% 888 Conversion-Composite Prop. 100% 32 Cemetery& Related Buildings 101% 38 Funeral Home 101% 60 Nursing Home 102% 61 Convalescent Hospitals 102% 62 Converted Res. Used as Nursing 102% 28 Bowling Alleys 112% 92 Skating Rinks 112% 50 Single Medical Bldgs. to 3 Stories 124% 51 Small Medical Center 124% 52 Medical Center Complex 124% 53 High Rise Medical 124% 54 Converted Residence to Medical 124% 89 Average Flow Shopping Center 139% 20 Amusement Parks 144% 35 Entertainment Center 144% 73 Recreation 144% 30 Coin Operated Car Wash 151% 47 Supermarket 151% 48 Convenience Market 151% 90 High Flow Shopping Center 226% 76 Restaurant—Take Out 300% 77 Restaurant—Coffee Shop 600% 78 Restaurant—Dinner House 600% 79 Restaurant—Conversion from SF 600% 29 Conventional Car Wash 796% NOTE: Multiply the Table A Single Family Residential Rate by the percentage figure above in order to determine the rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 14 - ARTICLE III CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Section 3.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to impose Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly- connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 3.02. Definitions. A. "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing, planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair. B. "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non- discriminatory charge imposed at the time a building or structure is newly connected to the District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. This charge does not apply to temporary facilities or operations that are regulated under the provisions of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. C. "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to physically connect a property to the District's system, including but not limited to, installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines, and appurtenances to make the connection and which fee does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and overhead for the installation of those facilities. D. "Non-discriminatory' means that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non- public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the proportionate share of use of those facilities. E. "Public agency" means the United States or any of its agencies, the State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of WS&S—TLWJ1o#168454:05/21/03:FIMAL - 15 - California, a county, city, district, school district, local or regional public authority, or any other political entity, subdivision or public corporation of the State. F. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Connection Charge, as provided for in Sections 3.07, 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 of this Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly or annual basis, as determined by the District. Said charge is required to be paid by dischargers that exceed the maximum quantity of flow or constituents (BOD or SS) allowed as a base use for which the CFCC is paid. Section 3.03. Connection Permits: Required. A. Connection permits are required of each and every dwelling unit, and each commercial or industrial building, and structure connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to the District's facilities. Multiple detached structures on a single parcel of property shall each be required to obtain a connection permit. B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit under Sections 305 — 305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01, or as amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit, as authorized above, may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. There will be a non-discriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained. Section 3.04. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No application for a permit for a connection of a structure to a District sewerage facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant, except as provided for discharges under a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said property. WS&S—TLW:jfo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 1 6 - Section 3.05. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment. A. Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District., or if none, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. B. Upon application of any property owner seeking to connect to the District's system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property. Section 3.06. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts. Every person or entity connecting any new or expanded building or structure to the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the applicable category of use set forth on Table C, below. WS&S-TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 17 - TABLE C CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial— Industrial Per 1,000 square feet' Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 170.00' Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,040.00' High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $2,470.00' Single Family Residential Per Unit 5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $3,890.00 4 Bedrooms Per Unit $3,330.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,800.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,270.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,740.00 Multi-Family Residential Per Unit 4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $3,020.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,490.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,960.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,400.00 Studio Per Unit $ 890.00 'Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be $2,800.00; and all calculations shall be on a 1,000 square foot, or portion thereof, basis. A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file in the Office of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building Department of each City within the District. *Low Demand connections are the following categories of Users: Nurseries; Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches; Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. **High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundries; Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants; Food Processing Facilities; Textile Manufacturers; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. ***All other connections are Average demand users. WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 18- Section 3.07. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial — Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischar ec� rs— Definitions. A. A Significant Commercial — Industrial User ("SCIU") is any person or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but excluding domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") greater than 150 pounds per day, or Suspended Solids ("SS") greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Article 3, due to having federally or District regulated or significant discharges. B. A special purpose discharger ("SPD") is any person or entity who discharges to the sewer system wastewater or process flow in an amount greater than 25,000 gpd (excluding domestic, industrial or commercial) and who is required to obtain a Special Purpose Discharge Permit as prescribed in Section 305 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01 or its successor. C. An Existing SCIU or SPD is any SCIU or SPD connected and discharging to the District's system prior to January 1, 2000. D. A New SCIU or SPD is any user who connects and discharges to the District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or after January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in Subparagraphs 3.07A and B above, but, subsequent to January 1, 2000, increases flow, or BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU or SPD. E. The maximum discharge allowed to a user, for which a base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Table C, above, is 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base use"). Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this Subsection 3.07E shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 3.08 and 3.09 hereof. F. Each Existing SCIU shall have a baseline of allowed discharge of flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of January 1, 2000. The baseline shall be based upon the discharge for Fiscal Year 1998-99, or upon such other discharge data which the District determines is representative of the user's actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who are deemed to be SCIU's solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, pursuant to Section 3.07A above, shall have a minimum baseline established as follows: Flow—25,000 gallons per day; BOD— 150 pounds per day; and SS — 150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to discharge flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 19 - G. Each Existing SPD shall have a baseline of 25,000 gpd, 150 pounds per day of BOD and 150 pounds of SS. The Existing SPD shall be authorized to discharge flow up to 25,000 gpd without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. H. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed by Sections 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 below, shall be payable commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance. I. Within two (2) years from the date of the District's written notice to the existing SCIU of its baseline amounts, the existing SCIU, as described in Section 3.07C, shall have a right to appeal the District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the General Manager, or his designated representative, who shall have discretion, based upon extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager. The decision of the General Manager shall be final. Section 3.08. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial — Industrial Users. In addition to the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table C, for commercial — industrial use category properties, all New SCIU's shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound of BOD, or SS, exceeding the base use discharge maximums, in the amount shown in Table D. Section 3.09. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Purpose Dischargers. All New SPDs shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge of $0.00102 per gallon per day for each gallon of flow exceeding 25,000 gallons per day. Upon issue of permission to discharge, SPD with discharges above 25,000 gpd shall pay a nonrefundable Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, prior to discharge, for one million gallons above 25,000 gpd. The deposit will be credited by the District against future Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges. Section 3.10. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischargers. A. All Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users connected to and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either (i) an increase of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 25% per day over its established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or (ii) an increase WS&S-TLW:jIo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 20 - of either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per day, whichever is lesser, over its established baseline authorization. B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in the following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in Section 3.10A above: TABLE D SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Daily Charge Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00102 BOD Pounds Per Day $0.29611 SS Pounds Per Day $0.21015 C. All Existing SPDs connected and discharging to the sewer shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon occurrence of an increase of discharge flow over 25,000 gpd. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be $0.00102 per gallon per day of discharge for each gallon above 25,000 gpd. D. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the User's baseline or 25,000 gpd for SPDs. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for a year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District. Section 3.11. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C that would be for the prior category of use which was terminated and removed. Section 3.12. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the WS&S-TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 21 - new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C for the prior category of use. Section 3.13. Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off- Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner, shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due, provided the original Agreement is still in force. The Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3.06 through 3.10 hereinabove, established for property connecting to said facilities. Section 3.14. No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid for the connection of a specific building or structure on a parcel of property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any other parcel of property. Section 3.15. Baseline Transferability. The baseline of allowed discharge of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such previously existing baseline be provided to another SCIU concurrently or subsequently occupying the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in accordance with Section 3.08 above. ARTICLE IV MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to recover those costs incurred by the District (i) on account of industrial dischargers' and wastehaulers' use of the District's facilities; (ii) when administering the District's Source Control Program; and (iii) when performing non-compliance sampling of industrial wastewater dischargers who have violated the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations or the terms and conditions of the discharger's permit. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used to defray the costs incurred by the District (i) on account of such use of the District's facilities; and (ii) in performing these tasks. WS&S-TLW:jIo#166454:05/21/03:FINAL - 22 - Section 4.02. Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees. Administrative fees and charges relating to permittees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table E, below. Section 4.03. Industrial Discharger, Source Control, and Non- Compliance Sampling Fees. Industrial discharger, source control, and non- compliance sampling fees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table F, below. Section 4.04. Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 305.5 and 305.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, charges for use are hereby established for Special Purpose Discharge Permittees, as set forth in Table G, below Section 4.05. Class I and Class II Permittees— Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 302.3, 302.6, 303.3 and 303.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for Class I and Class II Permittees as set forth in Table G, below. Section 4.06. Wastehauler Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 306.3 and 306.7 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for wastehaulers as set forth in Table H, below. Section 4.07. Administrative Appeals. A. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any decision, action, or determination by the District may, within forty-five (45) days of the date of mailing by the District of the initial invoice for fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance, request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees. Following review of such a request, the District shall notify the user, permit applicant, or permittee by certified mail of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. B. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by the District's decision on the reconsideration request, may file an appeal in accordance with Sections 617 and 619 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. WS&S—TLW:jIo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 23 - TABLE E ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITTEES Permit Fees Charges A. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit $335.00/year B. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit $70.00/year C. Special Purpose Discharge Permit $250.00/year - One-Time Application $975.00/permit - Nonrefundable Deposit for First One Million Gallons — New Permit Only $316.38 D. Wastehauler Discharge Permit $75.00/year Wastehauler Fees Charges F. Permit Decal Initial Issue $25.00 G. Permit Decal Replacement $50.00 H. Entry Card Initial Issue $50.00 I. Entry Card Replacement $100.00 J. After Hours Discharge — Prearranged $85.00/event K. After Hours Discharge — Emergency $100.00/event L. District's Collection of Tax Data $100.00/permit M. District's Collection of Water Consumption Data $100.00/permit N. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400/appeal WS&S-TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 24 - TABLE F INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Minor Violation $225.00/event Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Major Violation $500.00/event Cost of Analysis Charge Heavy Metals: $35.00/each - Aluminum - Antimony - Arsenic - Cadmium - Chromium - Copper - Gold - Lead - Molybdenum - Nickel - Palladrum - Platinum - Selenium - Silver - Thallium - Zinc Mercury $78.00 601/602 $152.00 604 $223.00 606 $254.00 608 $523.00 610 $73.00 612 $200.00 624 $355.00 625 $661.00 Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $21.00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") $44.00 BOD and Suspended Solids ("SS") Analysis $67.00 WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 25 - TABLE F (CONTINUED) INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge Chemical Oxygen Demand $44.00 Conductivity $15.00 Cyanide (Amenable) $70.00 Dissolved Mineral Solids $15.00 Gamma Radiation Determination $115.00 Gross Alpha and Beta Determination $50.00 Tritium Determination $50.00 Grease and Oil (Hexane Soluble Matter) $74.00 Grease and Oil (Mineral Partition) $74.00 Total Organic Nitrogen $48.00 pH $8.00 Fluoride $51.00 Suspended Solids (Total) $23.00 Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) $44.00 Total Dissolved Solids $14.00 Total Sulfides $29.00 WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 26 - Y TABLE G CLASS I AND CLASS II PERMITTEES AND SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITTEES CHARGES FOR USE Permit User Flow (*) B.O.D. (**) S.S.(***) Domestic Equivalent Class I and II $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 $105.00 Special Purpose $316.38 $233.00 $230.14 $105.00 Discharge Permit * Flow - Per million gallons of Flow ** S.S. - Per thousand pounds of Suspended Solids ***B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of Biochemical Oxygen Demand All properties located within Revenue Area No. 14 pay no annual service fees. District costs relating to providing service to these properties are billed by OCSD directly to the Irvine Ranch Water District, the local agency providing the local sewer service. WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 27- TABLE H WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE Wastehauler Fees Charges Charge for Use —Waste originating $0.035/gallon of within Orange County truck capacity Charge for Use —Waste originating $0.11/gallon of outside Orange County truck capacity WS&S-TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL - 28 - ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01. Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be in addition to the provisions of District Ordinance No. OCSD- 01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District's Sewage Facilities, including provisions for payment of charges or fees related thereto; District Ordinance No. OCSD-03, as amended, Establishing Fees Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and any other District Ordinances and Resolutions not in conflict herewith. Section 5.02. Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax-exempt organizations, except as expressly provided herein. The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does further hereby ORDAIN: Section H. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section Ill. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2003. Section IV. Repeal. Ordinance Nos. OCSD-18 and OCSD-19 are hereby repealed. Section V. Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. WS&S—TLW:jIo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL -29 - PASSED AND ADOPTED by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held CHAIR, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ATTEST: SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT GENERAL COUNSEL WS&S—TLW:jlo#168454:05/21/03:FINAL -30 - Third Quarter Ended March 31, 2003 IfE _ p , .40 . . . . . . rt:0 _ . . . . . . . . . . .�r e - _ . a1 I rm do ' �/�N'' .,t:-.•...� a .. _.v --�c-_�.. - I Orange County Sanitation District, California .� Table of Contents Section1 - Overview..............................................................•--..................................................1 Section 2 - Joint Operating Budget Review Chart of the Cost per Million Gallons by Department— Budget and Actual............................1 Chart of the Net Expenses by Major Category— Budget and Actual.....................................1 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge.......................................................................2 Comparison of Expenses by Department..............................................................................3 Summary of Expenses by Major Category........................•--.................................................4 Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item............................................................5 Summary of Expenses by Line Item.....................................................................••...............6 Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process......................................................................8 Chartof Staffing Trends........................................................................................................9 Section 3 - Capital Improvement Program Review Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source...................................1 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Current Year.....................2 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements - Project Life........................6 Section 4- Budget Review by Revenue Area Summary Budget Reviews- All Revenue Areas ...................................................................1 `a' Consolidated Revenue Area Budget Review.........................................................................2 RevenueArea No. 7 Budget Review ....................................................................................3 Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review............... .....4 Section 5— Self Insurance Budget Review General Liability Fund Budget Review ..................................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review......................................................................2 ,m, i l., 2002-03 Third Quarter Report This Page Intentionally Left Blank 6W boo 6w ww Third Quarter Financial Report Overview March 31, 2003 The Finance Department is pleased to present the 2002-03 third quarter comprehensive financial report. This report provides the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District and reports on the status of all capital projects in progress. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. Joint Operating Budget Review: At March 31, 2003, 70.81 percent, or$46.33 million of the 2002-03 net joint operating budget of $65.42 million has been expended. Net ,y operating expenses increased by $9.38 million from the same period last year, primarily due to 1) increased salaries, wages, and employee benefits as a result of twenty-four additional full-time equivalent employees, 2) increased costs of chemicals as a result of disinfecting the effluent, 3) increased costs for biosolids removal due to providing more secondary treatment, and 4) increased costs of temporary services as a result of doing more testing of the levels of bacteria from the outfall. The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2003 is $709.63 based on flows of 65.28 billion gallons, or 238.26 million gallons per day. This is $7.32, or 1.02 percent below CEO the budgeted cost per million gallons of $716.95. This lower cost per million gallons is due to net expenses being 5.58 percent, or$2.74 million lower than the proportionate budget through March 31, 2003. This is offset by flows being 4.70 percent lower than ow the budgeted amount of 250 million gallons per day. Some of the significant joint operating results as of March 31, 2003 include: k.m Salaries, Wages and Benefits —Joint operating personnel costs were at 72.00 percent of budget through March 31 while staffing was 27 full-time equivalents (FTE's), or 4.76 percent below the total 567 FTE's approved in the 2002-03 budget. "" Net joint operating personnel costs are expected to be at or below budget at year- end. There are currently 20 positions being recruited. OW Memberships— Membership expense totaled $322,500, or 161.82 percent of the $199,300 budget as of March 31. This expense is $150,000 higher than at the same time last year due to membership in three new agencies: Center for Urban 's' Infrastructure and Community Design, The Center for a New Orange County, and UCI Civil and Environmental Engineering. These new memberships were not anticipated at the time the budget was prepared. Additionally, the District's $75,000 'a' membership in the Water Environment Research Foundation was shown as a cost of research in the prior year and is now more properly classified as a membership in MW the current year. • Training—Training expense totaled $429,100, or 53.87 percent of the $796,500 budget as of March 31 because many of the District's training programs are anticipated to occur in the last quarter of the fiscal year. However, training costs are now projected to come in under budget at year-end. kCO Section 1 - Page 1 LW WW 2002-03 Third Quarter Report • Operating Expenses — Overall operating expenses totaled $8,580,000, or 63.59 percent of the composite $13,492,100 budget. These expenses are proportionately low through the third quarter mainly as a result of the disinfection of effluent (which comprises 52.86 percent of the composite operating expense budget) not starting L' until mid-August. Additionally, since this is the first year for performing disinfection of effluent, there was no trend data available for use in budgeting. • Temporary Services—Temporary services totaled $532,400, or 181.83 percent of the $292,800 budget. The cost of temporary services is higher than anticipated primarily due to additional help needed in testing bacteria levels from the outfall as a result of the new disinfection program. • Professional Services—Overall professional services totaled $1,345,100, or 57.84 W percent of the composite $2,325,500 budget. Advocacy efforts totaled $154,700, or 103.84 percent of the $149,000 budget. Conversely, other types of professional services, such as Environmental Scientific Consulting, Energy Consulting, and Labor Negotiation Services have processes that are in the planning or request for proposal stages or were started later in the fiscal year; consequently, they have costs that are proportionately low as of March 31. Professional services such as Engineering, FIS Support, Industrial Hygiene Services, and Other Professional Services are proportionately low due to the timing of when the services are provided versus when +� payment is made. It is anticipated that the costs for this category will increase in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year but will be below the total amount budgeted as of the fiscal year-end. • Research & Monitoring — Research & Monitoring costs totaled $1,268,400 or 86.47 percent of the composite $1,466,900 budget. These costs are traditionally high at the end of the third quarter due to the majority of the costs being incurred early in the fiscal year. These accounts are expected to approximate budget at fiscal year- end. • Insurance— Insurance expense totaled $692,000, or 26.36 percent of the $2,625,000 budget. This expense is lower than the proportionate budget through March 31 due to the budget being prepared prior to the actual premium costs being determined by the insurance broker. In addition, the budget was prepared assuming that earthquake coverage would be obtained. However, the District did not obtain " earthquake coverage due to a reduction in available coverage being offered in the marketplace, leaving the District entirely self-insured for earthquake coverage. Insurance expense is anticipated to total approximately$920,000 at year-end. • Net Cost Allocation — Cost allocation totaled $14.54 million, or 66.15 percent of the $21.97 million budget. The allocation of costs to capital projects is expected to increase throughout the rest of the year as the District focuses on the design of secondary treatment facilities. Section 1 - Page 2 Overview • Sludge Disposal Revenue — Sludge disposal revenue is $398,500, or 49.82 percent of the $800,000 budget through March 31. This revenue is proportionately low because the rate that is charged is lower than was anticipated when the budget was — prepared. • Power Sales Revenue — Power sales revenue is $86,000, or 14.34 percent of the $600,000 budget through March 31. This revenue is proportionately low due to mechanical problems which have resulted in a lower production of electricity than was anticipated when the budget was prepared. The summary of expenses by treatment process shows a 560.10 percent increase in the utilities process from the same time period last year. This increase is a result of the disinfection process as all the disinfection costs are included within the utilities process. Comparison of Third Quarter Cost per Million Gallon Results With Year-End Actuals (Budget) Last Five Years 718.95 709.63 725 650 575.59 563.09 575 518.25 512.78 495.41 500.75 r 476.56 48 1.9 6 — - 500 .r 425 98-99 99.00 00_01 01-02 02.03 3rd Year 3rd Year 3rd Year 3rd Year 3rd Annual Otr end Qlr end Qlr end Otr end Otr Budget As demonstrated in the preceding graph, the cost per million gallons at the end of the third quarter has been within 2.50 percent of year-end totals. The cost comparison for 2002-03 is consistent with this trend as the third quarter cost per million gallons is within 1.02 percent of the budget. Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's actual contribution towards the gallonage charge through the third quarter of 2002-03 and as budgeted for 2002-03. Page 1 also provides a budget to actual graphical comparison of revenues and expenses by major category. Section 1 - Page 3 2002-03 Third Quarter Report More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2 �. provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the third quarter for the current and two prior years; Section 2 — Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department through March 31 for the current and two prior years; two Section 2 — Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major category through March 31 , 2003 and 2002; Section 2 — Page 5 provides a summary of joint operating revenues by line item through March 31 , 2003 and 2002; Section 2 — pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line item through March 31, 2003 and 2002; Section 2 — Page 8 provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through March 31, 2003 and 2002; Section 2 — Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total positions authorized, actual positions filled, and vacant positions. Capital Outlay Review: $160,000,000 .. S140,000,000 S120,000,000 S100,000,000 - S80,000,000 — -- - - - S60,000,000 — $40,000,000 $20,000,000 so- 3/31/03 Actual Projected 2002-03 2002-03 Capital Outlay Capital Outlay Capital Outlay Cashflow Budget S74,159,700 S106,664,500 $154,420,300 r" As depicted by the preceding chart, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $74,159,700 or 48.02 percent of the capital outlay cashflow budget for 2002-03 as of March 31, 2003. Costs are proportionately low through the third quarter as many projects are still in the design phase or have experienced various delays. Capital outlay _ costs are expected to be $106,664,500, or 69.07 percent of budget at year-end. Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each process category and a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each major capital improvement funding source. For more detailed information, Section 3 — Pages 2 through 5 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3 — Pages 6 through 9 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over the project life. Section 1 - Page 4 r Overview Budget Review by Revenue Areas: At March 31, 2003, revenues from all Revenue Areas totaled $113.41 million, or 24.52 percent of budget. No debt has been issued as of March 31; consequently, no proceeds, budgeted at $280 million, have been received. Additionally, no sale of capacity rights, budgeted at $8.11 million, has been received. Capacity rights are sold when entities that discharge into the District's system exceed their previously purchased capacity. As of March 31, no entities have exceeded their purchased capacity in significant enough amounts to require them to purchase more capacity rights. Tax allocations and subvention revenue, budgeted at $39.48 million, is at 71.08 percent of budget, or$28.06 million, and Other User Fees, budgeted at $86.33 million, is at 64.17 percent of budget, or$55.39 million. These revenue sources are proportionately low through the third quarter because a significant portion of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are distributed to the District during the last quarter of the fiscal year. These revenues are anticipated to approximate budget at year-end. Interest revenue, budgeted at $39.10 million, is at $21.12 million, or 54.02 percent of budget. This is due to the lower than anticipated interest rate yields occurring in the current year. The capital assessment charge to IRWD is proportionately low at $2.19 million, or 58.34 percent of budget, as a result of the capital outlay costs being proportionately low as explained in the Capital Outlay Section. Conversely, connection fees, budgeted at $5.82 million, are at 113.93 percent of budget, or$6.64 million due to higher than expected building activity within the member cities. Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $148.50 million, or 54.20 percent of budget through the third quarter. The costs incurred related to capital improvement projects are proportionately low at $74.16 million or 48.02 percent of budget, as previously explained in the Capital Outlay Section. Additionally, COP retirement and interest expense, budgeted at $39.00 million, is low at 50.35 percent of budget, or $19.63 million, essentially due to lower than anticipated interest rates. Self-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for portions of workers' compensation, property damage, and general liability. Separate fund accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $1,877,700 or 62.70 percent of the $2,995,000 budget at December 31, while total expenses were $1,975,900 or 68.41 percent of the $2,888,500 budget. Section 1 - Page 5 2002-03 Third Quarter Report tau This Page Intentionally Left Blank , W Section 1 - Page 6 Joint Operating Budget Review r Cost per Million Gallons by Department Budget and Actual March 31, 2003 $600 $550 $500 WW $450 $400 Wo $350 $300 ¢� S250 P $200 9 S150 — ! - - i 1 $100 S50 SO Executive Finance Human Technical Engineering Operations& Information MW Management Resources Services Maintenance Technology ■Budget ■Actual r ... Net Expenses by Major Category Budget and Actual (in thousands) March 31, 2003 S50,000 S45,000 ..� S40,000 $35,000 S30,000 S25,000 j S20,000 $15,000 S 10,000 S5,000 $o N > N a5' Q CD CM N j N C N L U T H U O m CDo c c c c i� co 4 _ = m > - U) 0 C cc al N O C N N 0. n C N N Z N O G>ci a � a Ow otn ocf) a) ¢ yCr w m 2 w U EL Cr CD n o ay U rn O m ■Budget ■Actual Section 2 - Page 1 4 2002-03 Third Quarter Report Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge L For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002-03 3131101 3/31102 Annual 3131103 Actual Actual Budget Actual Flow In Million Gallons 67,556.00 64,197.00 91,250.00 65,282.97 Flow in Million Gallons per Day 246.55 234.30 250.00 238.26 General Manager's Department low General Management Administration $ 13.15 $ 14.46 $ 16.23 $ 17.29 Administrative Services 4.60 10.53 10.01 9.43 Communications 4.78 5.65 6.57 6.38 6„+ Subtotal 22.53 30.64 32.81 33.10 Finance Department Finance Administration 15.72 16.40 32.28 13.47 1 Accounting 13.94 16.85 16.94 17.55 Purchasing&Warehouse 11.43 13.59 14.57 15.08 Subtotal 41.09 46.84 63.79 46.10 Human Resources Department Human Resources Administration 13.74 13.59 6.82 6.02 Employee Development/Training - - 8.04 4.26 Safety and Health 10.06 6.90 11.49 9.80 Human Resources - - 7.41 5.80 V Subtotal 23.80 20.49 33.76 25.88 Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 6.74 6.80 8.61 8.99 Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 41.60 39.40 38.61 37.29 Environmental Sciences Laboratory 38.79 43.63 44.68 51.11 Source Control 30.83 35.47 35.93 37.52 Subtotal 117.96 125.30 127.83 134.91 V Engineering Department Engineering Administration 4.77 6.15 6.81 6.95 Planning 12.82 15.79 12.56 11.15 ` Project Management Office 17.71 21.81 17.77 13.03 �+ Engineering and Construction 34.18 38.02 49.74 52.63 Subtotal 69.48 81.77 86.88 83.76 Operations&Maintenance Department Operations&Maintenance Administration 6.46 3.35 6.00 6.15 ~ O&M Process Engineering 11.33 12.23 16.38 15.47 Plant No. 1 Operations 78.16 90.55 107.33 122.85 Plant No.2 Operations 114.88 125.18 190.22 172.15 Mechanical Maintenance&Power Production 95.90 99.31 106.07 102.72 Instrumentation&Electrical Maintenance 61.83 65.88 68.89 69.87 Air Quality&Special Projects 13.23 15.08 17.02 15.63 Collection Facilities Maintenance 15.96 17.67 21.62 19.79 Plant Facilities Maintenance 41.08 50.93 52.49 50.35 Subtotal 438.83 480.18 586.02 574.98 Information Technology Department Information Technology Administration 8.86 9.09 6.31 6.38 Customer&Network Support 17.36 18.92 29.69 28.77 Programing&Database 12.44 12.43 14.68 14.25 Process Ctrl Integration 10.31 12.12 14.35 14.26 WW Subtotal 48.97 52.56 65.03 63.66 Total Joint Operating Expenses 762.66 837.78 996.12 962.39 Less: Cost Allocation (215.69) (232.09) (240.81) (222.67) Net Joint Operating Requirements 546.97 605.69 755.31 739.72 f.r Less:Revenues (28.72) (30.10) (38.36) (30.09) Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 518.25 $ 575.59 $ 716.95 $ 709.63 V Section 2- Page 2 u Joint Operating Budget Review Comparison of Expenses by Department For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002-03 3/31/01 3131102 Year to Date Budget% Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 3/31103 Realized General Manager's Department LW General Management Administration $ 888,103 $ 928,135 $ 1,480,600 $ 1,128,932 76.25% Administrative Services 310,451 676,210 913,200 615,442 67.39% Communications 323,117 362,614 599,600 416,511 69.46% Subtotal 1,521,671 1,966,959 2,993.400 2,160,885 72.19% No Finance Department Finance Administration 1,061,832 1,053,069 2,945,800 879,227 29.85% Accounting 941,965 1,081,849 1,545,600 1,145,836 74.14% kmt, Purchasing&Warehouse 772,366 872,336 1,329,400 984,697 74.07% Subtotal 2,776,163 3,007,254 5,820,800 3,009,760 51.71% Human Resources Department Human Resources Administration 927,944 872,323 622,500 392,713 63.09% Employee Development/Training - - 733,400 278,287 37.94% Safety and Health 679,590 443,160 1,048,900 639,636 60.98% Human Resources - - 676,300 378,928 56.03% %aw Subtotal 1,607.534 1,315,483 3,081,100 1,689,564 54.84% Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 455,147 436,266 786,100 586,840 74.65% Environmental Compliance&Monitoring 2,810,537 2,529,172 3,523,400 2,434,093 69.08% Um Environmental Sciences Laboratory 2,620,437 2,800,782 4,077,200 3,336,375 81.83% Source Control 2,082,794 2,277,085 3,278,900 2,449,678 74.71% Subtotal 7,968,915 8,043,305 11,665,600 8,806,986 75.50% Engineering Department Engineering Administration 322,359 394,697 621,100 453,520 73.02% Planning 866,081 1,013,495 1.146.300 728,050 63.51% Project Management Office 1,196,017 1,399,588 1,621,700 850,750 52.46% Engineering and Construction 2,308,884 2,440,545 4,538,500 3,436,048 75.71% Subtotal 4,693,341 5,248,325 7,927,600 5,468,368 68.98% Operations&Maintenance Department Operations&Maintenance Administration 436,195 214,761 547,800 401,219 73.24% O&M Process Engineering 765,297 785,347 1,494,600 1,010,253 67.59% Plant No. 1 Operations 5,279,997 5,812,827 9,793,600 8,020,203 81.89% Plant No.2 Operations 7,761,439 8,036,823 17,357,100 11,238,150 64.75% too Mechanical Maintenance&Power Production 6,478,703 6,375,193 9,679,100 6,705,560 69.28% Instrumentation&Electrical Maintenance 4,176,969 . 4,229,495 6,286,000 4,561,009 72.56% Air Quality&Special Projects 893,468 968,089 1,553,200 1,020,061 65.67% ,a, Collection Facilities Maintenance 1,078,062 1,134,063 1,973,200 1,292,089 65.48% Plant Facilities Maintenance 2,775,171 3,269,698 4,789,700 3,286,924 68.62% Subtotal 29,645,301 30,826,296 53,474,300 37,535,468 70.19% Information Technology Department Information Technology Administration 598,427 583,558 575,600 416,795 72.41% Customer&Network Support 1,173,081 1,214,877 2,708,900 1,878,476 69.34% Programing&Database 840,303 797,985 1,339.800 930,226 69.43% L-ft Process Ctrl Integration 696,450 778,359 1,309,200 931,149 71.12% Subtotal 3,308,261 3,374,779 5,933,500 4,156,646 70.05% Total Joint Operating Expenses 51,521,186 53,782,401 90,896,300 62,827,677 69.12% Less: Cost Allocation (14,570,515) (14,898,872) (21,974,900) (14,536,642) 66.15% Net Joint Operating Requirements 36,950,671 38,883,529 68,921,400 48,291,035 70.07% Less: Revenues (1,939,513) (1,932,514) (3,500,000) (1,964,368) 56.12% Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 35,011,158 $ 36,951,015 $ 65,421,400 $ 46,326,667 70.81% Section 2-Page 3 2002-03 Third Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Major Category For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 Expense Expense Increase Increase Percent a.t Budget Through Through (Decrease) (Decrease) Budget Remaining Description 2002-03 3131103 3131102 $ % Realized Budget Salary,Wages&Benefits $48,737,300 $35,092,455 $32,235.635 $2,856,820 8.86% 72.00% $13,644,845 Administrative Expenses 854,800 688,623 508,444 180,179 35.44% 80.56% 166,177 Printing&Publication 440,800 276,487 304,431 (27,944) -9.18% 62.72% 164,313 Training&Meetings 1,072,100 620,354 452,706 167,648 37.03% 57.86% 451,746 6� Operating Expenses 13,492,100 8.579,852 4,461,389 4,118,463 92.31% 63.59% 4,912,248 Contractual Services 8,828,900 6,984,722 5,957,567 1,027.155 17.24% 79.11% 1,844,178 i.a Professional Services 2,325,500 1,345,065 1,174,490 170,575 14.52% 57.84% 980,435 Research&Monitoring 1.466,900 1,268,432 1,143,828 124,604 10.89% 86.47% 198,468 Repairs&Maintenance 5,927,700 3,988,520 3,222,025 766,495 23.79% 67.29% 1,939,180 Utilities 4.164,200 2,903,024 3,107,535 (204,511) -6.58% 69.71% 1,261,176 60 Other Materials,Supplies, and Services 3,586,000 1,080,143 1.214,351 (134,208) -11.05% 30.12% 2,505,857 Net Cost Allocation (21,974,900) (14,536,642) (14,898,872) 362,230 -2.43% 66.15% (7,438,258) Net J.O. Requirements 68,921,400 48,291,035 38,883,529 9,407,506 24.19% 70.07% 20,630,365 yr Revenues (3,500,000) (1,964,368) (1,932,514) (31,854) 1.65% 56.12% (1,535,632) Net J.O. Expenses $65,421,400 $46,326,667 $36,951,015 $9.375,652 25.37% 70.81% $19,094,733 d.r+ Gallonage Flow(MG) 91,250.00 65,282.97 64,197.00 1,085.97 1.69% Gallonage Flow(MGD) 250.00 238.26 234.30 3.96 1.69% Gallonage Flow($'s/MG) $716.95 $709.63 $575.59 $134.04 23.29% w.a Mw Section 2-Page 4 Joint Operating Budget Review Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 Revenue Revenue Revenue Increase Increase Budget Through Through Remaining Through (Decrease) (Decrease) Description 2002-03 3/31/03 3/31/03 Budget 3/31/02 $ % Inter District Sewer Use $ 1,300,000 $ 906,258 69.71% $ 393,742 $ 608,335 $297,923 48.97% Wastehauler 450,000 341,464 75.88% 108,536 322,553 18,911 5.86% Sludge Disposal 800,000 398,527 49.82% 401,473 600.298 (201.771) -33.61% CNG Sales 200,000 199,610 99.81% 390 132.054 67,556 51.16% m Other Sales - 8,891 N/A (8,891) 6,202 2,689 43.36% Rents&Leases 25,000 17,520 70.08% 7,480 20,857 (3,337) -16.00% General Non-Operating 125,000 6,079 4.86% 118,921 100,749 (94,670) -93.97% Q Power Sales 600,000 86,019 14.34% 513,981 141,466 (55,447) -39.19% Total $ 3,500,000 $ 1,964,368 56.12% $ 1,535,632 $ 1,932,514 $ 31,854 1.65% Section 2- Page 5 I 2002-03 Third Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Line Item tww For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 Expense %Expense Expense Increase Increase Budget Through Through Remaining Through (Decrease) (Decrease) Description 2002-03 3131103 3/31103 Budget 3131/02 $ % Salaries,Wages&Benefits Salaries&Wages $ 39,385,100 $ 28,663,090 72.78% $ 10,722.010 $ 27,588,066 $ 1,075,024 3.90% Employee Benefits: Retirement 3,930,200 2,596,888 66.08% 1,333,312 1,306,725 1,290,163 98,73% Group Insurances 4,815,100 3,316,747 68.88% 1,498,353 2,940,214 376.533 12.81% Tuition Reimbursement 152,300 69,715 45.77% 82,585 100,885 (31,170) -30.90% Uniform Rental 86,300 60,626 70.25% 25,674 60,387 239 0.40% Workers'Compensation 343,000 374,996 109.33% (31,996) 238,200 136,796 57.43% Unemployment Insurance 25,300 10,393 41.08% 14,907 1,158 9,235 797.50% Total Benefits 9,352,200 6,429,365 68.75% 2,922.835 4,647,569 1,781,796 38.34% Salaries,Wages&Benefits 48,737,300 35,092,455 72.00% 13,644,845 32,235,635 2,856,820 8.86% tw Matl.Supply,&Services Administrative Expenses Memberships 199,300 322,513 161.82% (123,213) 172,659 149,854 86.79% Office Exp-Supplies 140,100 91,419 65.25% 48,681 86,822 4,597 5.29% 6w Office Expense-Other 96,500 66,784 69.21% 29,716 57,573 9,211 16,00% Small Computer Items 252,700 175,614 69.50% 77,086 153,984 21,630 14.05% Minor Furniture&Fixtures 166,200 32,293 19.43% 133,907 37.406 (5,113) -13.67% hrt Printing&Publication Repro-In-House 315,61)0 226,927 71.90% 88,673 223,933 2,994 1.34% Printing-Outside 70,300 19,692 28.01% 50,608 33,372 (13,680) -40.99% Notices&Ads 42,900 18,909 44.08% 23,991 38,708 (19,799) -51.15% W Photo Processing 12,000 10,959 91.33% 1,041 8,418 2,541 30.19% Training&Meetings Meetings 275,600 191,271 69.40% 84,329 166,659 24,612 14.77% V Training 796,500 429,083 53.87% 367,417 286,047 143,036 50.00% Operating Expenses Chemical Coagulants 1,777,300 1,449,324 81.55% 327,976 1,072,223 377,101 35.17% Sulfide Control 1,890,000 2,045,976 108.25% (155,976) 1,233,616 812,360 65.85% Odor Control 1,529,500 1,032,329 67.49% 497,171 1,298,769 (266,440) -20.51% Disinfection 7,132,000 3,087,390 43.29% 4,044,610 53,444 3,033,946 5676.87% Chemicals-Cogen Oper. 15,000 11,330 75.53% 3,670 4,396 6,934 157.73% Miscellaneous Chemicals 12,600 11,630 92.30% 970 10,919 711 6.51% Gasoline,Diesel&Oil 311,200 244,036 78.42% 67,164 180,218 63,818 35.41% Tools 141,100 101,983 72.28% 39,117 84,685 17,398 20.57% Solv,Paints&Jan.Supplies 47,900 37,554 78.40% 10,346 33,516 4,038 12.05% Lab Chemicals&Supplies 345,500 329,735 95.44% 15,765 267,304 62,431 23.36% Other Operating Supplies 254,000 206,221 81.19% 47,779 192,140 14,081 7.33% Property Tax Fees 36,000 22,344 62.07% 13,656 30,259 (7,915) -26.16% Contractual Services Solids Removal 6,222,000 5,134,337 82.52% 1,087,663 4,554,293 580,044 12.74% Other Waste Disposal 641,000 307,098 47.91% 333,902 311,179 (4,081) -1.31% i Groundskeeping 223,800 141,120 63.06% 82,680 121,178 19,942 16.46% Janitorial 370,000 225,119 60.84% 144,881 149,564 75,555 50.52% Outside Lab Services 184,800 109,420 59.21% 75,380 151,333 (41,913) -27.70% Oxygen Plant Oper 325,000 231,822 71,33% 93,178 225,353 6,469 2.87% Temporary Services 292,800 532,384 .181.83% (239,584) 200,939 331,445 164.95% 1.d Security Services 245,000 171,391 69.96% 73.609 101,580 69,811 68.73% Other 324,500 132,031 40.69% 192,469 142,148 (10,117) -7.12% (Continued) Section 2- Page 6 Joint Operating Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 .� Expense %Expense Expense Increase Increase Budget Through Through Remaining Through (Decrease) (Decrease) Description 2002-03 3131103 3131103 Budget 3/31/02 $ % Continued: Professional Services Legal 490,000 351,472 71.73% 138,528 354,544 (3,072) -0.87% Audit&Accounting 75,000 49,000 65.33% 26,000 45,200 3,800 8.41% Engineering 195,600 80,811 41.31% 114.789 57,007 23,804 41.76% Enviro Scientific Consulting 366,000 138,972 37.97% 227.028 228,792 (89.820) -39.26% FIS Support 225,000 121,300 53.91% 103,700 105,769 15,531 14.68% Software Prgm Consulting 160,000 101,733 63.58% 58,267 72,829 28,904 39.69% Energy Consulting 50,000 450 0.90% 49,550 - 450 N/A Advocacy Efforts 149,000 154,718 103.84% (5,718) 30,000 124,718 415.73% Industrial Hygiene Services 15,000 8,968 59.79% 6,032 - 8,968 N/A Labor Negotiation Services 100,000 33,941 33.94% 66,059 7,695 26,246 341.08% Other 499,900 303,700 60.75% 196,200 272,654 31,046 11.39% Research&Monitoring Environmental Monitoring 880,400 795,291 90.33% 85,109 790,427 4,864 0.62% `wo Air Quality Monitoring 115,000 65,884 57.29% 49,116 87,113 (21,229) -24.37% Research 471,500 407,257 86.37% 64,243 266,288 140,959 52.94% Repairs&Maintenance M' Materials&Services 4,353,800 3,023,217 69.44% 1,330,583 2,545,080 478,137 18.79% Svc.Mtc.Agreements 1,573,900 965,303 61.33% 608,597 676,945 288,358 42.60% Utilities 'm' Telephone 182,100 129,352 71.03% 52,748 117,674 11,678 9.92% Diesel For Generators 10,000 11,287 112.87% (1,287) 5,307 5,980 112.68% Natural Gas 1,640,100 920,725 56.14% 719,375 1,379,373 (458,648) -33.25% Power 1,187,000 1,032,806 87.01% 154,194 804,975 227,831 28.30% Water 1,145,000 808.854 70.64% 336,146 800,206 8.648 1.08% Other Operating Supplies wo Outside Equip Rental 76,600 42,317 55.24% 34,283 69,239 (26,922) -38.88% Insurance 2,625,000 691.986 26.36% 1.933,014 845,041 (153,055) -18.11% Freight 66,700 53,894 80.80% 12,806 42,939 10,955 25.51% Misc.Operating Expense 246,800 144,998 58.75% 101,802 121,471 23.527 19.37% AQMD Operating Fees 168,500 126,828 75.27% 41.672 111,803 15,025 13.44% General Manager Contingency 308,900 - 0.00% 308,900 - - WA Prior year reappropriation 30,700 - 0.00% 30,700 - - N/A Other Non-Oper Expense 62,800 20,120 32.04% 42,680 23,858 (3,738) -15.67% e Matls,Supp,&Serv. 42,159,000 27,735,222 65.79% 14,423,778 21,546,766 6,188,456 28.72% Total Expenditures 90,896,300 62,827,677 69.12% 28,068,623 53,782,401 9,045,276 16.82% Less:Cost Allocation (21,974,900) (14,536,642) 66.15% (7,438,258) (14,898,872) 362,230 -2.43% Net J.0.Requirements 68,921,400 48,291,035 70.07% 20,630,365 38,883,529 9.407,506 24.19% Less: Revenues (3,500,000) (1,964,368) 56.12% (1,535,632) (1,932,514) (31,854) 1.65% Net J.0.Expenses $ 65,421,400 $ 46,326,667 70.81% $ 19,094,733 $ 36,951,015 $ 9,375,652 25.37% Section 2- Page 7 d 2002-03 Third Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 1.d Increase Increase Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) 3/31103 3131l02 $ Treatment Process: Preliminary Treatment $ 3,322,499 $ 3,759,229 $ (436.730) -11.62% Primary Treatment 3,869,502 2,776,380 1,093,122 39,37% Secondary Treatment 2,633,025 2,251,974 381.051 16.92% Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 415,382 413,032 2,350 0.57% Effluent Disposal 368,291 312,419 55,872 17.88% Solids Handling 17,443,962 14,791,613 2,652,349 17.93% Cogeneration 5,093,257 5.560,567 (467,310) -8.40% Utilities 6,356,481 962,964 5,393,517 560.10% Electrical Distribution 449,311 478,351 (29,040) -6.07% Miscellaneous Buildings 2.994,187 3,149,416 (155,229) -4.93% w Air Quality 1,099,362 1,027,953 71,409 6.95% Laboratory 4,245,776 3,399,631 846,145 24.89% Net Joint Operating Requirements 48,291,035 38,883,529 9,407,506 24.19% Less: Revenues (1,964,368) (1,932,514) (31,854) 1.65% Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 46,326,667 $ 36,951,015 $ 9,375,652 25.37% yw rr pw �r Section 2-Page 8 Joint Operating Budget Review .. Staffing Trends Full Time Equivalents March 31, 2003 600 .� 574 567 54D '27 63 �)19 sic �10 .0 1 450 --.Adds, 6/30/1999 6/30/2000 6/30/2001 6/30/2002 3/31/2003 ■Actual O Vacant r At March 31, 2003, the total head count was 549 employees, or a full time equivalency of 540. r. Section 2 - Page 9 I 2002-03 Third Quarter Report This Page Intentionally Left Blank Section 2- Page 10 CIP Review Capital Improvement Program By Type and Funding Source For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 52.892,092 53,914.974 Headworks Prior Year 4% Projects _ 520,901,687 59.079,786 5�' .i Primary Treatment Collections _ 289b Facilities 12°6 S 1,386,977 Equipment - 2% 51,750,826 Seconday 54,701,754 Treatment-2% Water Management 53.087.385 Solids Projectsr,andling 8 Digestion-49; 6°0 51.134,101 Odor Control Miscellaneous Related Projects- 2% 8 Support Projects 53,471,533 510.05t.609 Outfail 7'. utility 53.705,794 53.167.042 Ocean Systems Process Plant Systems +� 4'o Related Automation 149e Special 59; Projects 5% Total Capital Improvement Expenditure -$74,159,671 $29,276,062 Replacement/ Rehabilitation 40°L S 13.581.401 Improved Treatment 56,037,286 1896 Support 8% 4 525,264.922 Additional Capacity 34*a Total Capital Improvement Expenditure - S74,159,671 Section 3 - Page 1 2002-03 Third Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year 4 For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 2002-03 2002-03 2002-03 Cashflow Actual at Projected Budget 3131103 Outlay Collection System Improvement Projects Collections Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. $ - $ 10,106 $ 10,110 Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump Stn.Abandonment 343,000 86,154 122,160 Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Prot. 821,000 483,572 733,580 Abandonment of the Existing SARI in SA River - - - Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon 161,000 8,909 8,910 Orange-Westem Subtrunk Relief Sewer 119,000 423,050 423,050 Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer 1,180,000 - - Rehabilitation of the Seal Beach Pump Station 175,000 - - Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station 193,000 23,953 23,960 Lining of 36"NPTB FM(Junc Box to 2nd Angle Pt.) 1.959,000 164,445 1,442.250 Relocation of Lido Pump Station 139,000 4,180 4,180 j Big Canyon Offsite Sewer Rehabilitation 103,000 30,966 65,970 Jri► Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Replacement 96,000 37,873 55,880 Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer 464.000 89,894 89,900 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station 392,000 65,915 85,920 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 1,165,000 31,179 61,180 Rehabilitation of the 14th Street Pump Station 374,000 93,134 143,140 Rehabilitation of the"A"Street Pump Station 858,000 188,369 238,370 Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station 350,000 11,847 21,850 Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station 158.000 19,029 44,030 Abandonment of AB Trunk,Watson and Cal.Sewers 95,000 32,165 36,170 Abandonment of AB Trunk Sewers-Watson St 651.000 7,708 17,710 Abandonment of AB Trunk Sewers-Arlington Dr 546,000 844.701 848,710 Abandonment of AB Trunk Sewers-California St 3,000 3,512 5,520 Newland Street Intereptor Sewer Protection 144,000 5,904 5,910 Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 1,319,000 81.048 81.050 ` PCH Boat Yard and HB Sewer Abandonment 378,000 63,905 63,910 L+} Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station 252,000 29,556 31,560 Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 7,505,000 4,290,967 7,090,970 ; Facilities Engineering Projects-Collections 300,000 102,894 366,900 Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 6/30102 - 80,996 120,000 Subtotal-Collections 20,243,000 7,315,931 12,242,850 iI Revenue Area 7 L Covey Lane Pump Station Abandonment 91,000 39,562 67,570 Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 20,000 94,992 99,000 Lemon Heights Subtrunk Street Rehabilitation 270,000 - - College Ave Pump Station Parallel Force Main 349,000 15,281 25,290 Gisler-Redhill Trunk Sewer Relocation-Phase 1 662,000 - 5,000 Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach"A" 1,573,000 62,827 112,830 Gisler-Redhill System Improvements,Reach"B" 858,000 111,106 161,110 Tustin Trunk Improvements 53,000 3,343 8,350 Orange Trunk Improvements 1,214,000 40,411 80,420 West Trunk Improvements 13,000 4,708 4,710 Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements 3,067,000 388,238 388,240 Replacement of the College Ave Pump Station 176,000 - - Rehabilitation of the MacArthur Pump station 62,000 - - Rehabilitation of the Michelson Pump Station 30,000 9,631 9,640 Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station(28%) 124.880 7,083 34,690 Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 6/30/02 3,505 23,510 Subtotal-Revenue Area 7 8,562,880 780,687 1,020.360 Section 3-Page 2 V CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 2002-03 2002-03 2002-03 ,ago Cashflow Actual at Projected Budget 3/31103 Outlay Revenue Area 14 Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station(72%) 321,120 18,215 89,020 Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 6/30/02 - 3,558 10,000 Subtotal-Revenue Area 14 321.120 21,773 99,020 Total Collection System Improvement Projects 29,127,000 8,118,391 13.362,230 low Treatment&Disposal Projects Collections Facilities w Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 768,000 547,273 772,280 Replacement of the Ellis Ave Pump Station 1,400,000 414.122 764.130 Subtotal-Collections Facilities 2,168,000 961,395 1,536,410 Headworks Grit Auger Replacement 56,000 9,490 9,490 PLC Programming and Integration 496,000 32,190 117,190 Sunflower Drive Replacement 177,000 127,354 207,360 Headworks Rehabilitation/Refurbishment 75,000 5,925 5,930 Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2 4,980,000 2,717,133 4,017,140 Subtotal-Hoadworks 5.784,000 2,892,092 4,357,110 ice Primary Treatment Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 307,000 23,860 23,860 Pri.Clarifiers 16-31 &Related Facilities 30,549,000 20,658,509 27,078,510 d Primary Treatment Rehab/Refurb 20,000 2,213 92,220 Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement/Upgrade 271,000 199,870 260.000 Sludge Density Meter Upgrades 403,000 17,034 75,000 Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation 205,000 201 205,000 Subtotal-Primary Treatment 31,755,000 20,901,687 27,734,590 Secondary Treatment Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers 900,000 1,224,637 1,354,640 Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation - 1,153 26.160 Sec Treat Monitoring&Cntrt Sys Upgrad 369,000 284,263 567,900 Secondary Plant Rehabilitation 60,000 30,163 30.170 Oxygen Plant Replacement/Rehabilitation Assess 190,000 78,060 190,000 Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study 500,000 54,454 250,000 AS Clarifier Equipment Replacement 370,000 78,096 150,000 Computer Modeling of Activated Sludge System 85,000 Subtotal-Secondary Treatment 2,474,000 1,750,826 2,568,870 Solids Handling&Digestion Dewatering Belt Press Rebuild 103,000 55,909 56,000 New Belt Filtrate Clarifier 47,000 30,933 30,940 Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No.2 271,000 496,881 566,890 Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility 3,514,000 2,371,197 2,471,200 a Digestion&Dewatering Rehab./Refurbishment 56,000 3,352 3,360 High Rate Digester Mix Pumps Mach.Seals 72,000 37,882 40,000 Dewatering Belt Press Rebuild 126,000 91,231 126,000 Sludge Grinder Replacement 25,000 - - IMa Design/install Ultrasonic Sludge Treatment Process 732.000 Subtotal-Solids Handling&Digestion 4,946,000 3,087.385 3,294,390 Section 3 -Page 3 2002-03 Third Quarter Report arm Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 2002-03 2002-03 2002-03 Cashflow Actual at Projected Budget 3131/03 Outlay Ocean Outfall Systems Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall 5,746,000 5,182,584 5,182,590 Outfall Flow Meter Replacement 428,000 363,420 363.420 Peak Flow Management 808,000 434,711 624,720 Effluent Pumping Station Annex 2,506,000 1,333,783 1,633,790 Short Term Outfall Bacteria Reduction 4,800,000 1,755,296 3,255.300 IWO HB Shoreline Contamincation Investigation Phase III - 626.031 700,000 NPDES Permit Renewal 1,175,000 355,784 400,000 Subtotal-Ocean Outfall Systems 16,463,000 10,051,609 12,059,820 i Wd Utility Systems Electrical Power System Studies 922,000 222,377 382,380 Standby Power and Reliability Modifications 4,161,000 3.070,646 3,529,910 Cable Tray Improvements at Plants 1 &2 458,000 24,396 76,400 Central Generation Automation 2,638,000 75,522 546,770 Plant 1 66kV Substation 150.000 - - Gas Compressor Addition at Plant No.2 392.000 12,294 398,300 y�y Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment 868,000 66,298 96,300 Fuel Station Replacement at Plant No.2 324,000 - - Electrical Equipment Refurbishment and Protection 89,000 - Phone System Upgrade Plants 1 &2 199,000 - - b+ Rehabilitation of Low Pressure Gas Holder 422,000 - - Indoor/Outdoor Lighting Study 137,000 - 137,000 Plant 1 Plant Water VFD Replacement 730,000 50.000 Subtotal-Utility Systems 11,490,000 3,471,533 5,217,060 Odor Control Related Projects Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 63,000 25,209 25,210 Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 1,047,000 25,987 55,990 Scrubber Monitor and Control Project 224,000 932,189 932,190 Rehabilitation of Odor Control Facilities 200,000 111.064 129,270 Chemical Facility Mods.at Plant No.1 82,000 39,652 39,660 Subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 1,616,000 1,134,101 1,182,320 Plant Automation&Computerization Power Monitoring and Control Systems - - - Plant Reinvention/Automation Project 2,088,000 1,275,198 2,550,400 Document Management 10,000 13,322 23.330 Data Integration 346,000 326,536 400.000 Strategic Information Architecture(SIA) 70,000 1,083 70.000 CMMS Programming 62,000 9,432 60,000 Intranet Application Development 98,000 202,963 210,000 Voice-Data Building Rewiring 50,000 5,109 5,110 lad Internet E-mail Browsing(Website) 155,000 80,535 100,000 Source Control Programming 367,000 352,698 360,000 Geographic Information System 45,000 55,490 60,000 Field Fiber Optic Upgrades 50,000 45,497 60,000 low SCADA Communications-Ethernet Study 147.000 - - SCADA Graphics Tagging Update 185,000 5,736 16,740 Financial Information System Upgrade 1,408,000 638,390 888,390 �I Information Technology Disaster Recovery 302,000 1,163 51,170 Network Equipment Upgrade 1,159,000 153,890 278,890 Subtotal-Plant Automation&Computerization 6,502,000 3,167,042 5,123,030 Section 3-Page 4 CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 2002-03 2002-03 2002-03 .� Cashflow Actual at Projected Budget 3/31/03 Outlay Process Related Special Projects Effluent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives Plan 280,000 242,045 642,050 Standard Specifications Revisions and Updates 14,000 14,385 28,780 Plant O&M Manual and SOP Project-Phase 1 580.000 157,700 200,000 Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 380,000 224,758 300,000 Asset Management Program 967,000 507,408 900,000 Corrosion Management 287,000 105,179 170,000 Special Projects - 2.454,319 3,800,000 Subtotal-Process Related Special Projects 2,508,000 3.705,794 6,040,830 w Miscellaneous&Support Projects Continuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 451,000 - 50,000 Facilities Engineering Projects-Joint 900,000 195,305 300,000 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1 900,000 533,271 750,000 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 2 900,000 412,613 600,000 Interim Fac Record&Eng Data Syst Maint Services 210,000 35,16E 35,170 Area Classification Studies 6,623,000 2,114.758 5,114,760 Supplement No.1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR 308,000 90,537 100,540 Long Range Biosolids Management Plan 222,000 230,022 480.030 Strategic Plan Update 105,000 159,888 659,890 law Modifications to Existing Mech Systems 388,000 6,644 6,650 HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plants No.1 and 2 80,000 118,564 118,570 Space Allocation and Interior Renovation 336,000 83,795 283,800 Laboratory Rehabilitation 6,000 - 6,000 Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop 7,000 764 770 Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No.2 535,000 453,715 453,720 Security System Improvements 400,000 166,092 180,000 Small Cap.Equip.Replacement Project 500,000 302.003 450,000 Warehouse Reinvention Project 296,000 7,198 32,200 Process Safety Management Compliance Program 60,000 - 40,000 Plume Modeling 121,000 3,774 10,000 O&M Library Flooring&Shelving 64,000 - 64,000 Subtotal-Miscellaneous&Support Projects 13,413,000 4,914,111 9,736,100 Water Management Projects k=U Groundwater Replenishment System 15,540,000 3,702,341 5,202,350 Water Conservation 504,000 353,407 413,410 Co-op Projects,Inflowlinfilt.Reduction 6,181,000 - 300,000 Long Term Permanent Monitoring Program 839,000 646.006 871.010 Subtotal-Water Management Projects 23,064,000 4,701,754 6,786.770 Additional Charges to CIP Completed at 6/30102 - 3,914,974 4,414,980 Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 121,183,000 64,654,303 90,052,280 d Capital Equipment Purchases 4,110,300 1,386,977 3.250,000 Total Collections and Treatment&Disposal Projects and Capital Equipment Purchases $154,420,300 $74,159,671 $106.664,610 Section 3-Page 5 LW - r � 2002 03 Third Quarte Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Project Life For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 Current Total Approved ' June 30,2002 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cost June 30,2003 Budget Collection System Improvement Protects Collections Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. $ 7,494,000 $ 393,450 $ 10,110 $ 403,560 $ 7,090,440 Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump Stn.Abandonment 3,584,000 183.437 122,160 305,597 3,278.403 Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Prot. 86,747,000 1,726,656 733,580 2,460,236 84,286,764 Abandonment of the Existing SARI in SA River 8,456,000 151 - 151 8,455,849 Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon 1,619,000 1,211,651 8,910 1,220,561 398,439 Orange-Westem Subtrunk Relief Sewer 1,682,700 1,320,400 423.050 1,743,450 (60,750) Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer 26,667,000 - - - 26,667,000 Rehabilitation of the Seal Beach Pump Station 3,645,000 - - - 3,645,000 Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station 1,803,000 173,657 23,960 197,617 1,605.383 Lining of 36"NPTB FM(June Box to 2nd Angle Pt.) 1,959,000 - 1,442,250 1,442,250 516,750 Relocation of Lido Pump Station 3,686,000 147,040 4,180 151,220 3,534.780 Big Canyon OHsite Sewer Rehabilitation 3,435,000 24,635 65,970 90,605 3,344,395 Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Replacement 810,000 - 55.880 55,880 754,120 Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer 8,095,000 6,369,480 89,900 6,459,380 1,635,620 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station 4.882,000 261,464 85,920 347,384 4,534,616 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 5,775,000 134,013 61,180 195,193 5,579,807 Rehabilitation of the 14th Street Pump Station 4.493,000 675,103 143,140 818.243 3,674,757 Rehabilitation of the"A"Street Pump Station 4,596.000 1,005,549 238,370 1,243,919 3,352,081 frs+ Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station 1,816,000 127,126 21,850 148,976 1.667,024 Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station 933,000 113,122 44,030 157,152 775.848 Abandonment of AB Trunk,Watson and Cal.Sewers 384,000 268,543 36,170 304,713 79,287 Abandonment of AB Trunk Sewers-Watson St 1.200,000 47 17,710 17,757 1,182.243 Abandonment of AB Trunk Sewers-Arlington Dr 1.130,000 7,400 848,710 856,110 273,890 Abandonment of AB Trunk Sewers-Califomia St 1.068,000 826 5.520 6,346 1,061,654 Newland Street Intereptor Sewer Protection 144.000 7,016 5,910 12,926 131,074 Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 7,026,000 536,375 81.050 617,425 6,408,575 PCH Boat Yard and HB Sewer Abandonment 378.000 - 63,910 63,910 314,090 Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station 1,817,000 146,242 31,560 177,802 1,639,198 Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 38,984,000 1,861,862 7,090,970 8,952,832 30,031,168 Facilities Engineering Projects-Collections 5,400,000 - 366,900 366,900 5,033,100 Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 6/30/02 22,779,816 20,031,191 120,000 20,151,191 2,628,625 1 Subtotal-Collections 262,488,516 36,726,436 12.242,850 48,959,286 _ 213,519,230 Revenue Area 7 Covey Lane Pump Station Abandonment 100.000 31,135 67,570 98,705 1,295 Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 5,395,000 470,114 99,000 569,114 4,825,886 Lemon Heights Subtrunk Street Rehabilitation 503,000 - - - 503,000 bd College Ave Pump Station Parallel Force Main 1,890,000 99,653 25,290 124,943 1,765,057 Gisler-Redhill Trunk Sewer Relocation-Phase 1 800,000 - 5,000 5,000 795,000 Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach"A" 7,832,000 315,839 112,830 428,669 7,403,331 Gisler-Redhill System Improvements,Reach"B" 4,986,000 52,659 161,110 213,769 4,772,231 Tustin Trunk Improvements 3,662,000 8.630 8,350 16,980 3,645,020 Orange Trunk Improvements 5,840,000 272.370 80,420 352,790 5,487,210 West Trunk Improvements 497,000 2,049 4,710 6,759 490,241 �y Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements 16,316,000 376,539 388,240 764,779 15,551,221 Replacement of the College Ave Pump Station 4,512,000 - - - 4,512,000 Rehabilitation of the MacArthur Pump station 1,651.000 - - - 1,651,000 Rehabilitation of the Michelson Pump Station 918,000 379 9,640 10,019 907,981 60 Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station(28%) 272,000 440 34,690 35,130 236,870 Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 6/30/02 - 763,496 23,510 787,006 (787,006) Subtotal-Revenue Area 7 55,174,000 2,393,303 1,020,360 3,413,663 51,760,337 Section 3- Page 6 CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 Current Total c� Approved June 30,2002 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cost June 30,2003 Budget Revenue Area 14 Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station(72%) 697,000 1,131 89,020 90,151 606,849 Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 6/30/02 - 69,489 10,000 79,489 (79,489) Subtotal-Revenue Area 14 697,000 70,620 99,020 169,640 527,360 Total Collection System Improvement Projects 318,359,516 39,190.359 13,362,230 52,552,589 265,806,927 Treatment&Disposal Proiects Collections Facilities Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 1,709,000 811,985 772,280 1,584,265 124,735 Replacement of the Ellis Ave Pump Station 27,100,000 52,780 764,130 816.910 26.283,090 Subtotal-Collections Facilities 28.809,000 864,765 1,536,410 2,401,175 26,407.825 cep Headworks Grit Auger Replacement 1,131,000 1,065,349 9,490 1,074,839 56,161 PLC Programming and Integration 500,000 5,055 117,190 122,245 377,755 Sunflower Drive Replacement 758,000 520,393 207.360 727,753 30,247 Headworks Rehabilitation/Refurbishment 11,346,000 63,821 5,930 69,761 11,276,249 Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2 160,130,000 3,694,529 4,017,140 7,711,669 152,418,331 Subtotal-Headworks 173,865,000 5,349,147 4,357,110 9,706,257 164,158,743 Primary Treatment Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 1,311.000 907,910 23,860 931,770 379,230 Pri.Clarifiers 16-31 &Related Facilities 89,947,000 13,562,458 27,078,510 40,640,968 49,306,032 Primary Treatment RehablRefurb 11,904,000 454 92,220 92,674 11,811,326 Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement/Upgrade 3,103,000 78,334 260,000 338,334 2,764,666 Sludge Density Meter Upgrades 800.000 3,824 75,000 78.824 721,176 Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation 364,000 136 205.000 205,136 158,864 Subtotal-Primary Treatment 107,429,000 14,553,116 27,734,590 42,287,706 65,141,294 Secondary Treatment Trickling Filler Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers 50,000,000 2,905,581 1,354,640 4,260,221 45,739,779 Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation 12,850,000 12,366 26,160 38,526 12,811,474 Sec Treat Monitoring&Cntrl Sys Upgrad 6,917,000 220,384 567,900 788,284 6,128,716 b Secondary Plant Rehabilitation 7,443,000 5,120 30,170 35,290 7,407,710 Oxygen Plant Replacement/Rehabilitation Assess 262.000 2,461 190,000 192,461 69,539 Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study 950,000 38,580 250,000 288,580 661,420 d AS Clarifier Equipment Replacement 450,000 242,704 150,000 392,704 57,296 Computer Modeling of Activated Sludge System 120,000 - - 120,000 Subtotal-Secondary Treatment 78,992,000 3,427,196 2,568,870 5,996,066 72,995,934 Solids Handling&Digestion Dewatering Belt Press Rebuild 528,000 616,954 56,000 672,954 (144,954) New Belt Filtrate Clarifier 1,325,000 - 30,940 30,940 1,294,060 Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No.2 15,154,000 14,025,502 566,890 14,592,392 561,608 Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility 14,450,000 11,026,433 2,471,200 13,497,633 952,367 Digestion&Dewatering Rehab./Refurbishment 10,490,000 44 3,360 3,404 10,486,596 High Rate Digester Mix Pumps Mech.Seals 517,000 445,432 40,000 485,432 31,568 Dewatering Belt Press Rebuild 824,000 514,894 126,000 640,894 183,106 Sludge Grinder Replacement 224,000 198,997 - 198,997 25,003 Design/Install Ultrasonic Sludge Treatment Process 2,600,000 - 2,600,000 Subtotal-Solids Handling&Digestion 46,112,000 26,828,256 3,294,390 30,122,646 _ 15.989,354 Section 3-Page 7 2002-03 Third Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 Current Total Approved June 30,2002 Year Projected Remaining 4W Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cost June 30,2003 Budget Ocean Outfall Systems Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall 7,961,000 1,730,608 5,182,590 6,913,198 1,047,802 Outfall Flow Meter Replacement 2,055,387 1,739,060 363,420 2,102,480 (47,093) Peak Flow Management 10,815,000 539,390 524,720 1,064,110 9,750.890 Effluent Pumping Station Annex 50,827,000 2,560,092 1,633,790 4,193,882 46,633,118 Short Tenn Outfall Bacteria Reduction 7.930,000 723,976 3,255,300 3,979,275 3,950,725 HB Shoreline Contamincation Investigation Phase III 5,227,000 4,301,771 700,000 5,001,771 225,229 NPDES Permit Renewal 1,512,000 589.829 400,000 989,829 522,171 Subtotal-Ocean Outfall Systems 86,327,387 12,184,725 12,059,820 24,244,545 62,082,842 4d Utility Systems Electrical Power System Studies 3,216,000 2,538,878 382,380 2,921,258 294.742 Standby Power and Reliability Modifications 19,856,000 9,582,710 3,529,910 13,112,620 6,743.380 Y�f Cable Tray Improvements at Plants 1 &2 26,790,000 1,072,936 76,400 1,149,336 25,640,664 Central Generation Automation 2,964,000 234,571 546,770 781,341 2,182.659 Plant 1 66kV Substation 4,315,000 - - - 4,315,000 Gas Compressor Addition at Plant No.2 2,555,000 67,187 398,300 465,487 2,089,513 Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment 4.756,000 713,737 96,300 810,037 3,945,963 Fuel Station Replacement at Plant No.2 426,000 - - - 426,000 Electrical Equipment Refurbishment and Protection 1,567,000 - - - 1,567,000 �► Phone System Upgrade Plants 1 &2 199,000 - - - 199,000 Rehabilitation of Low Pressure Gas Holder 422,000 - - - 422,000 Indoor/Outdoor Lighting Study 137,000 - 137,000 137,000 - Plant 1 Plant Water VFD Replacement 730,000 - 50,000 50,000 680,000 Subtotal-Utility Systems 67.933,000 14,210,019 5,217,060 19,427,079 48,505,921 Odor Control Related Projects Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 301,000 375,313 25,210 400,523 (99,523) low Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 2,909,000 567,537 55,990 623,527 2,285,473 Scrubber Monitor and Control Project 3,319,300 2,610,242 932,190 3,542,432 (223,132) Rehabilitation of Odor Control Facilities 29,200.000 2,432 129,270 131,702 29,068,298 Chemical Facility Mods.at Plant No.1 4.536,000 4,505,440 39,660 4,545,100 (9,100) Subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 40,265,300 8,060,964 1,182,320 9,243,284 31,022,016 Plant Automation&Computerization J�1 Power Monitoring and Control Systems 3,728,000 24,177 - 24,177 3,703,823 Plant Reinvention/Automation Project 25,866,218 11,706,550 2,550,400 14,256,950 11.609,268 Document Management 864,000 606,914 23,330 630,244 233,756 Data Integration 4,334,000 2,723,408 400,000 3,123,408 1,210,592 Strategic Information Architecture(SIA) 724,000 439,205 70,000 509,205 214,795 CMMS Programming 490,000 345,162 60,000 405,162 84,838 Intranet Application Development 300,000 90,962 210,000 300,962 (962) Voice-Data Building Rewiring 109,000 730,276 5110 735,386 (626.386) Internet E-mail Browsing(Website) 370,000 197,037 100,000 297,037 72,963 Source Control Programming 1,104,000 701,664 360,000 1,061,664 42,336 Geographic Information System 4,157,000 330,292 60,000 390,292 3,766,708 1* Field Fiber Optic Upgrades 229,000 545,036 50,000 595,036 (366,036) SCADA Communications-Ethernet Study 158,000 310 - 310 157,690 SCADA Graphics Tagging Update 425,000 43,070 15,740 58,810 366,190 Financial Information System Upgrade 2,225,000 719,004 888,390 1,607,394 617,606 Information Technology Disaster Recovery 332,000 32,912 51,170 84,082 247,918 Network Equipment Upgrade 2.910,000 966,934 278,890 1,245,824 1,664,176 Subtotal-Plant Automation&Computerization 48,325,218 20,202,913 5,123,030 25,325,943 22,999,275 Section 3-Page 8 CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Project Life For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 Current Total Approved June 30,2002 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cost June 30,2003 Budget Process Related Special Projects Effluent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives Plan 650,000 19,272 642,050 661.322 (11,322) Standard Specifications Revisions and Updates 200,000 464,452 28,780 493.232 (293,232) Plant O&M Manual and SOP Project-Phase 1 4,000,000 16,153 200,000 216,153 3.783,847 Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 1.190.000 329,108 300,000 629,108 560,892 Asset Management Program 1.027,000 84,290 900,000 984,290 42,710 Corrosion Management 313,000 - 170,000 170,000 143,000 Special Projects 11,515.000 3,543.094 3,800,000 7,343,094 4,171,906 Subtotal-Process Related Special Projects 18,895,000 4,456,369 6,040,830 10,497,199 8,397,801 Miscellaneous&Support Projects Continuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 451,000 - 50,000 50,000 401,000 v� Facilities Engineering Projects-Joint 18,200,000 1,767,038 300,000 2,067,038 16,132,962 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1 18,200,000 468,146 750,000 1,218,146 16.981,854 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 2 18,200,000 1,475,522 600,000 2,075,522 16,124,478 Interim Fac Record&Eng Data Syst Maint Services 628,000 346,804 35,170 381,974 246,026 Area Classification Studies 29,345,000 3.502,218 5,114.760 8,616,978 20,728,022 Supplement No.1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR 432,000 167,884 100,540 268,424 163,576 Long Range Biosolids Management Plan 592,913 10,413 480,030 490,443 102,470 taw Strategic Plan Update 3,418,000 - 659,890 659,890 2,758,110 Modifications to Existing Mech Systems 2,694,000 265,571 6,650 272,221 2,421,779 HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plants No.1 and 2 1,316,000 1,232,570 118,570 1,351,140 (35,140) u Space Allocation and Interior Renovation 12,974,000 552,898 283,800 836,698 12,137,302 Laboratory Rehabilitation 1,033,000 - 6,000 6,000 1.027,000 Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop 321,000 - 770 770 320,230 Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No.2 810,000 174.868 453,720 628,588 181,412 or, Security System Improvements 1,100,000 860,658 180,000 1,040,658 59,342 Small Cap.Equip.Replacement Project 3.000,000 1,223,307 450,000 1,673,307 1,326,693 Warehouse Reinvention Project 600,000 71,313 32,200 103,513 496,487 Process Safety Management Compliance Program 60,000 - 40,000 40,000 20,000 Plume Modeling 242,000 120,990 10,000 130,990 111,010 O&M Library Flooring&Shelving 144,000 - 64,000 64,000 80,000 Subtotal-Miscellaneous&Support Projects 113,760,913 12,240,200 9.736,100 21,976,300 91,784.613 Water Management Projects Groundwater Replenishment System 229,906,000 10,316,369 5,202,350 15,518,719 214.387,281 Water Conservation 4,644,000 2,198,092 413,410 2,611,502 2.032,498 Web Co-op Projects,Inflow/lnfilt.Reduction 142,676,000 - 300,000 300,000 142,376,000 Long Tenn Permanent Monitoring Program 7.074,000 3,348,734 871,010 4,219,744 2,854.256 Subtotal-Water Management Projects 384,300,000 15,863,195 6,786,770 22,649,965 361,650,035 Additional Charges to CIP Completed at 6130101 53,212,000 18,316,405 4,414,980 22,731,385 30,480,615 Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 1,248,225,818 156,557,270 90,052,280 246,609,550 1,001,616,268 cd Capital Equipment Purchases 4,110,300 - 3,250,000 3,250,000 860.300 Total Collections and Treatment&Disposal Projects and Capital Equipment Purchases $1,570,695,634 $195,747,629 $106,664,510 $302,412,139 $1.268.283.495 a� Section 3-Page 9 I 2002-03 Third Quarter Report This Page Intentionally Left Blank w Section 3 - Page 10 Budget Review by Revenue Area d All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 Operating Budget Review 2002-03 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget - CASH RECEIPTS: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 39,481,000 $ 28,063,310 $ 11,417,690 71.08% Other User Fees 86,325,000 55,392,770 30,932,230 64.17% Connection Fees 5,824,000 6,635,314 (811,314) 113.93% Sale of Capacity Rights 8,105,000 - 8,105,000 0.00% Capital Assessment(IRWD) 3,759.000 2,193,188 1,565,812 58.34% Debt Proceeds 280,000,000 - 280,000,000 0.00% Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 39,101,000 21,121,462 17,979,538 54.02% Total Receipts $ 462,595,000 $113,406,044 $349,188,956 24.52% CASH DISBURSEMENTS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 125,293,000 $ 66,041,280 $ 59,251,720 52.71% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 29,127,000 8,118,391 21,008,609 27.87% a COP Retirement and Interest Expense 38,995,000 19,633.361 19,361,639 50.35% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 65,421,400 46,326,667 19,094,733 70.81% Revenue Area Operating &Other Expenses 15,135,000 8,375,658 6,759,342 55.34% Total Disbursements $ 273,971,400 $148,495,357 $125,476,043 54.20% Iwo Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance Q, 07/01/02 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131103 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 39,269,237 $ 8,118,391 $ - $ 47,387,628 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 138,443,705 66,041,280 - 204,484,985 Subtotal 177,712,942 74,159,671 - 251,872,613 140 PROPERTY, PLANT& EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 10,398,595 - - 10,398,595 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 386,202,814 - - 386,202,814 � Treatment Facilities 627,673,508 - - 627,673,508 Disposal Facilities 90,161,860 - - 90,161,860 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 122,415,790 - - 122,415,790 Subtotal 1,236,852,567 - - 1,236,852,567 Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP $1,414,565,509 $ 74,159,671 $ - $1,488,725,180 Section 4- Page 1 2002-03 Third Quarter Report ' Consolidated Revenue Area Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 4W Operating Budget Review 2002-03 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date ow Budget Date Budget %of Budget CASH RECEIPTS: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 35,700,000 $ 25,455,933 $ 10,244,067 71.31% Other User Fees 73,424,000 47,359,908 26,064,092 64.50% Connection Fees 5,096,000 5,309,131 (213,131) 104.18% Sale of Capacity Rights 7,067,000 - 7,067,000 - Capital Assessment(IRWD) - - - - � Debt Proceeds 220,000,000 - 220,000,000 0.00% Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 34,858,000 19,591,742 15,266,258 56.20% it Total Receipts $ 376,145,000 $ 97,716,714 $278,428,286 25.98% i CASH DISBURSEMENTS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 109,256,000 $ 57,086,082 $ 52,169,918 52.25% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 20,243,000 7,315,931 12,927,069 36.14% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 34,988,000 18,390,741 16.597,259 52.56% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 57,047,500 40,365,447 16,682,053 70.76% Revenue Area Operating &Other Expenses 11,655,000 7,054,523 4,600,477 60.53% Total Disbursements $ 233,189,500 $130,212,724 $102,976,776 55.84% l� Capital Facilities Budget Review 4i Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01/02 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131/03 ", CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 35,729,658 $ 7,315,931 $ - $ 43,045,589 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 119,670,737 57,086,082 - 176,756,819 Subtotal 155,400,395 64,402,013 - 219,802,408 PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 7,542,629 - - 7,542,629 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 310,019,037 - - 310,019,037 Treatment Facilities 542,563,682 - - 542,563,682 Upi Disposal Facilities 77,938,898 - - 77,938,898 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 105,831,371 - - 105,831,371 Subtotal 1,043,895,617 - - 1,043,895,617 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP $1,199,296,012 $ 64,402,013 $ - $1,263,698,025 Section 4- Page 2 Budget Review by Revenue Area _. Revenue Area No.7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 Operating Budget Review 2002-03 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget - CASH RECEIPTS: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 3,781,000 $ 2,607,377 $ 1,173,623 68.96% Other User Fees 9.460,000 5,843,208 3,616,792 61.77% Connection Fees 728,000 1,326,183 (598,183) 182.17% Sale of Capacity Rights 792,000 - 792,000 - ��, Capital Assessment(IRWD) - - - - Debt Proceeds 60,000,000 - 60,000,000 0.00% Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 3,715,000 1,276,214 2,438,786 34.35% Total Receipts $ 78,476,000 $11,052,982 $ 67,423,018 14.08% CASH DISBURSEMENTS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 12,241,000 $ 6,907,918 $ 5,333,082 56.43% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 8,884,000 780,687 8,103,313 8.79% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 4,007,000 1.242,620 2,764,380 31.01% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 6,411,300 4,682,561 1,728,739 73.04% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,994,000 1,134,001 1,859,999 37.88% .,o Total Disbursements $ 34,537,300 $14,747,787 $ 19,789,513 42.70% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01/02 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131103 @' CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 3,389,046 $ 780,687 $ - $ 4,169,733 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 14,481,213 6,907,918 - 21,389,131 Subtotal 17,870,259 7,688,605 - 25,558,864 PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 2,348,125 - - 2,348,125 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 46,786,035 - - 46,786,035 Treatment Facilities 65,652,565 - - 65,652,565 Disposal Facilities 9,431,092 - - 9,431,092 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 12,810,241 - 12,810,241 Subtotal 137,028,058 - - 137,028,058 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP $154,898,317 $ 7,688,605 $ - $162,586,922 Section 4- Page 3 d 2002-03 Third Quarter Report Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review , For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 Operatinq Budget Review 2002-03 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget low CASH RECEIPTS: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of I%) $ - $ - $ - N/A Other User Fees 3,441,000 2,189,654 1,251,346 63.63% Connection Fees - - - N/A Sale of Capacity Rights 246,000 - 246,000 0.00% Capital Assessment(IRWD) 3,759,000 2,193,188 1,565,812 58.34% Debt Proceeds - - - N/A Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 528,000 253,506 274,494 48.01% l.n Total Receipts $ 7,974,000 $ 4,636,348 $ 3,337,652 58.14% CASH DISBURSEMENTS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 3,796,000 $ 2,047,280 $ 1,748,720 53.93% Collection Activity Capital Improvements - 21,773 (21,773) N/A COP Retirement and Interest Expense - - - N/A Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,962,600 1,278,659 683,941 65.15% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 486,000 187,134 298,866 38.50% Total Disbursements $ 6,244,600 $ 3,534,846 $ 2,709,754 56.61% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07101102 &Additions Fixed Assets 3/31103 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 150,533 $ 21,773 $ - $ 172.306 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 4,291,755 2,047,280 - 6,339,035 Jow Subtotal 4,442,288 2,069,053 - 6,511,341 PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): 1a+ Land and Property Rights 507,841 - - 507,841 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 29,397,742 - - 29,397,742 Treatment Facilities 19,457,261 - - 19,457,261 Disposal Facilities 2,791,870 - - 2,791,870 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 3,774,178 - - 3,774,178 Subtotal 55,928,892 - - 55,928,892 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP $ 60,371,180 $ 2,059,053 $ - $ 62,440,233 Section 4-Page 4 Self Insurance Review General Liability Fund Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2003 •.: Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 2002-03 Through Through 2002-03 Through Increase Budget 3131/03 3/31103 Budget 3131102 (Decrease) Revenues: In-Lieu Premiums $ 1,900,000 $ 1,425,000 75.00% $475,000 $ 934,875 $ 490,125 Interest& Miscellaneous 80,000 24,351 30.44% 55,649 21,531 2,820 Allocation from Other Funds 500,000 48,735 9.75% 451.265 381,299 (332,564) Total Revenues 2,480,000 1,498,086 60.41% 981,914 1,337,705 160,381 m Expenses: Benefits/Claims 300,000 9,821 3.27% 290,179 140,035 (130,214) w Contractual Services 3,500 600 17.14% 2,900 900 (300) E , Legal Services 450,000 306,567 68.13% 143,433 335,453 (28,886) Professional Services 5,000 1,475 29.50% 3,525 1,094 381 Supplies&Other - - N/A - - - Service Department Allocation 1,559,000 1,167,642 74.90% 391,358 1,169,145 (1,503) Subtotal 2,317.500 1,486,105 64.13% 831,395 1,646,627 (160.522) Excess Loss Policy 112,000 142,392 127.14% (30,392) 83,937 58,455 Total Expenses 2,429,500 1,628,497 67.03% 801,003 1,730,564 (102,067) Excess Revenue(Expenses) 50,500 (130,411) -258.24% $ 180.911 (392,859) 262,448 Beginning Reserves 629,500 301,883 1,154,388 (852,505) Ending Reserves $ 680 000 $ 171,472 $ 761.529 $(590,057) m w Section 5- Page 1 Lr 2002-03 Third Quarter Report Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 2002-03 Through Through 2002-03 Through Increase Budget 3/31/03 3/31/03 Budget 3/31/02 (Decrease) Revenues: In-Lieu Premiums $500,000 $375,000 75.00% $125,000 $238,200 $136,800 60 Interest& Miscellaneous 15,000 4,638 30.92% 10,362 9,228 (4,590) Total Revenues 515,000 379,638 73.72% 135,362 247,428 132,210 �a Expenses: Benefits/Claims 250,000 232,147 92.86% 17,853 260,691 (28,544) Contractual Services 25,000 17,813 71.25% 7,187 20,704 (2,891) �, Legal Services 25,000 11,882 47.53% 13,118 18,280 (6,398) Professional Services 35,000 15,034 42.95% 19,966 28,400 (13,366) �_01 Supplies &Other - - N/A - - - Service Department Allocations 89,000 17,892 20.10% 71,108 20,232 (2,340) Subtotal 424,000 294,768 69.52% 129,232 348,307 (53,539) Excess Loss Policy 35,000 52,625 150.36% (17,625) 28,875 23,750 ~` Total Expenses 459,000 347,393 75.68% 111,607 377,182 (29,789) low Excess Revenue(Expenses) 56,000 32,245 57.58% $ 23,755 (129,754) 161,999 Beginning Reserves 157,500 (79,645) 109,742 (189,387) Ending Reserves $213,500 $ (47,400) $ (20,012) $ (27,388) I Orr Irl Section 5- Page 2 w Orange County Sanitation District, California (714) 962-2411 www.ocsd.com Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Street Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 OCSD 03/31/03