Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-04-23 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT April 16, 2003 chan (714)962_24111' NOTICE OF MEETING er p14,962d3513 www.ecad.sem BOARD OF DIRECTORS ,main,address: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PC Eo+E127 Fountain 92728 B127 WEDNESDAY, April 23, 2003 - 7:00 P.M. scrs.c.ddri 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 8270E-701E DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Matter i Fountain Valley, California 92708 • cities The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Ant im District will be held at the above location, time and date. Brea Buena Park Cypress Feunfein Valley A ' Fullerton Barden Grave --- Hundngtan Beach and Sec' ry Irvine / La Habra Le Palma Las Alamitos Newport Beach orange Tentatively- Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Placentia series Ana Seal Beech PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, May 1, 2003 at 5:00 p.m. Stamm rusao OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 7, 2003 at 5:00 m. Villa Perk y, Y P Y,bn Linda Count, or orange FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 14,2003 at 5:00 p.m. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT 9anlearg Districts SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE Monday, May 12,2003 at 5:30 p.m.QOCWD Costa Mae. Midway City STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 28,2003 at 5.00 p.m. Water Districts Irdne Ranch ra maintain woHdclass leadership in waetean ter and water resource management. D a BOARD MEETING DATES Board Meeting May 28, 2003 June 25, 2003 July 23, 2003 August 27, 2003 September 24, 2003 October 22, 2003 *November 19, 2003 *December 17, 2003 January 28, 2004 February 25, 2004 March 24, 2004 April 28, 2004 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month G9wp.OWa dmin\BSWgenda\2003 Meeting NoUwMMN3.2.tloc NO. 2OF3 CHAIR'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF APRIL 23, 2003 1 . THE MEETING SCHEDULE FOR THE NEXT MONTH SHOWS: A. THURSDAY, MAY 1 ST, PDC COMMITTEE MEETING STARTING AT 5 B. WEDNESDAY, MAY 7T", URBAN RUNOFF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING STARTING AT 3 P.M. C. THE WEDNESDAY, MAY 7T" OMTS COMMITTEE MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELLED. D. WEDNESDAY, MAY 14TH, FAHR COMMITTEE STARTING AT 5. E. AND THE STEERING AND BOARD MEETINGS ARE ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 28T", at 5 AND 7 RESPECTIVELY. 2. TONIGHT'S AGENDA IS REMARKABLE. IT INCLUDES: A. A REPORT BY VISITING SCIENTISTS ON THE RESULTS OF OUR HUNTINGTON BEACH STUDIES, B. A VIDEO AND REPORT OF THE CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AROUND OUR OUTFALL, C. CONSIDERATION OF A SCHEDULE TO ACHIEVE SECONDARY TREATMENT BY DECEMBER 2012, D. CONSIDERATION OF A MULTIPLE-YEAR EFFORTTO BRING ASSET MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO THE DISTRICT, E. CONSIDERATION OF ISSUING $280 MILLION IN NEW FIXED-RATE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION FOR OUR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM, F. AWARD THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR THE FIRST SEGMENT OF THE GWRS TREATMENT SYSTEM AND G. CONSIDERATION OF A USER RATE INCREASE OF 15% TO PAY FOR IT ALL. H. WE WILL ALSO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION TONIGHT ABOUT A MATTER THAT CAN IMPACTTHE ENTIRE SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED. Y I MUST SAY, THAT WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF OUR JULY 2002 MEETING WHEN WE VOTED TO MOVE TO FULL SECONDARY TREATMENT, THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT BOARD MEETING WE MAY EVER ATTEND. TONIGHT, WE WILL SET SOME EXTRAORDINARY PROGRAMS IN MOTION. Remarks to Steering and Board By Blake Anderson General Manager April 23, 2003 Report of General Manager • Letter received from Santa Ana. I received yesterday afternoon a letter from mayor Pulido asking that the Board not adopt a 15% user fee increase for this coming fiscal. The letter is in tonight's agenda package. I have informed the board by an e-mail I sent out around 1 PM today about the letter and included a listing of the staff analysis of the impacts of annual user fee increases of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 40 oin future borrowings and where the user rates will ultimately top out. • We are working on a concept that may turn into an MOU for your consideration—it involves the agencies that have considerable responsibility and authority over water quality in the Orange County Coastal Plain—the Sanitation District, the County of Orange, the Irvine Ranch Water District, the South Orange County Wastewater Authority and others. For an early heads-up on this idea, Bob G will outline the concept for you now. • We are suggesting tonight that you cancel the May OMTS meeting. There simply isn't enough substantive matters to warrant the meeting. NO. 3OF3 REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, MARCH 26, 2003, AT 5 P.M. THE MINUTES WERE REVIEWED AND APPROVED. 1 . I REPORTED ON THE PROGRESS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY AD HOC COMMITTEE. WE CONTINUE TO MEET WEEKLY TO ADVISE STAFF AND OUR CONSULTANTS ON THE SACRAMENTO AND WASHINGTON DC INITIATIVES WE ARE PURSUING. 2. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER a. THE GENERAL MANAGER REPORTED THAT WE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM SANTA ANA OPPOSING THE PROPOSED 15% USER FEE RATE HIKE. b. THE GENERAL MANAGER AND THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES DISCUSSED AN EMERGING CONCEPT FOR 4 IMPROVING COOPERATION IN THE ORANGE COUNTY COASTAL PLAN FOR IMPROVING WATER QUALITY. IT COULD RESULT IN AN M-O-U OR OTHER INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY, THE SANITATION DISTRICT AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES. c. STAFF REPORTED THAT THE ITEMS SCHEDULED TO BE PRESENTED AT THE NEXT OMTS COMMITTEE MEETING OF MAY 7T" ARE VERY LIMITED AND BECAUSE OF A LACK OF SUBSTANTIVE BUSINESS, RECOMMENDED THAT THE MEETING BE CANCELLED. THE STEERING COMMITTEE CONCURRED, AND THEREFORE, ALL MEMBERS OF THE OMTS COMMITTEE SHOULD TAKE NOTE THAT THE MAY MEETING IS CANCELLED. 3. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL 4. UNDER DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. THE STEERING COMMITTEE HEARD A STAFF REPORT ON THE COUNTY-WIDE DEVELOPMENT OF A DATABASE FOR REPORTING AND CATALOGING SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS AND THE WORK THAT THE DISTRICT AND OTHERS ARE DOING TO COMPLY WITH THE WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS THAT THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTOL BOARD ISSUED TO THE COUNTY LAST YEAR. THE COMMITTEE ALSO REVIEWED A REQUEST FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY CITY MANAGER'S ASSOCIATION THAT THE DISTRICT ACT AS COUNTY-WIDE COORDINATOR OF THESE COMPLIANCE EFFORTS. THE STEERING COMMITTEE DIRECTED STAFF TO ? t' B. THE AGENDA ITEMS SCHEDULED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE WORKING COMMITTEES IN APRIL WERE REVIEWED. C. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS WERE MADE ON ITEMS ON TONIGHT'S BOARD MEETING AGENDA. 5. THE COMMITTEE MET IN CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS A REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION, TWO CASES OF POTENTIAL LITIGATION AND TFC�� GENERAL MANAGER'S PERFORMANCE}. NO ACTIONS WERE TAKEN. i✓ Comments to OCSD Board of Diredors Meding,April 23, 2003 HELLO,MY NAME IS MONICA RUZICH. MY ADDRESS IS 5401 KENILWORTH DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649. [I REOUEST THAT ITEM#9A BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 1 I AM HERE TO PROTEST PROPOSED ANNEXATION #OCSD-29,THE SHEA HOMES ANNEXATION. THE OCSD AGENDA REPORT BEFORE YOU WITH THE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION STATES AS FACT THAT THIS PROJECT WILL BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THAT EIGHT(8) HOMES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON THIS SITE. THESE SO-CALLED FACTS HAVE NOT YET BEEN DETERMINED. THIS IS NOT A MATTER OF SIMPLE CONSENT. 83% OF THE BOUNDARY OF THIS PARCEL IS UNINCORPORATED COUNTY LANDS. BUT THIS MAP, ON EXHIBIT B, DOESN'T IDENTIFY WHAT THOSE SURROUNDING LANDS ARE. THESE LANDS ARE THE BOLSA CHICA. THAT INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY]IMPORTANT, WAY TOO IMPORTANT TO BE LEFT OFF A MAP, AND MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS. THIS DECISION CANNOT BE MADE IN A VACUUM—YOU MUST CONSIDER IT IN FULL CONTEXT. ALSO,THE DEVELOPERS OWN CONSULTANTS DESIGNATED THIS PARCEL AS WETLANDS IN THEIR FINAL EIR. • AND ONLY BY SIGNIFICANT ENGINEERING AND EARTHWORK AND THE ADDITION OF AN ILLEGAL SEAWALL CAN THIS EVEN BE PROPOSED AS A BUILDING SITE. THIS ANNEXATION DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR THE LAFCO UNINCORPORATED ISLAND PROGRAM BECAUSE 83% OF THE PARCEL IS BOUNDED BY UNINCORPORATED COUNTY LANDS, WHICH,BY THE WAY, ARE MADE UP OF THE BOLSA CHICA MESA AND LOWLANDS. THAT 83%,TOGETHER WITH THE PARCEL ITSELF BEING A WETLAND, AND THE REMAINING 17% BEING BOUNDED BY WETLANDS WITHIN THE CITY PORTION, COMBINES TO PREVENT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FROM MEETING THE REQUIRED LAFCO GOALS OF PREVENTING URBAN SPRAWL AND PRESERVING OPEN SPACES. IN SUMMARY,THIS DECISION MUST BE CONSIDERED IN FULL CONTEXT, IT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED IN A VACUUM. GIVEN THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AND THE STRONG OPPOSITION TO THE DEVELOPMENT, APPROVALS FOR ANY PORTION OF THE PROJECT ARE NOT ASSURED. ADD THE RELATIVE MISSTATEMENTS AND OMISSIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT, AND THIS ANNEXATION PROCESS SHOULD NOT PROCEED IN PARALLEL WITH OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY APPROVALS. UNTIL SUCH APPROVALS ARE FINALIZED,THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR CONSENT. PLEASE DEFER YOUR CONSENT. THANK YOU. MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE WITH PRIDE DATE: April 23, 2003 TO: Patsy Marshall, City Councilwoman Shalice Reynoso, City Clerk FROM: Jim Biery, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: OCSD—Asset Management, Item No. 12(d) I have reviewed the OCSD, Item No. 12(d) scheduled for your review on April 23, 2003. As we discussed, I have the following concerns: • The driving force for asset management in the public sector has been GASB 34. This is a requirement unique to the United States, but is not mentioned in the proposed work. • The Study, if implemented, should be fully compliant with all aspects of GASB 34 which is not something a firm from Australia would likely have experience implementing. • The staff report implies that the proposed team has not implemented advanced asset management in this country. This is not something we should want to pursue. • Question: "Why would we want to pay them to learn about US technologies and implementation of GASB 34?" • The report states that currently no US based consultant has fully implemented a whole agency advanced asset management program. This would lead the reader to believe that none exists in this country, which is not accurate. For instance, the Army Corps. of Engineers has an advanced asset management program. There are US and Canada vendors that offer advanced asset management systems. • It also appears that Parsons and GHD are teaming up for this project with minimal prior team experience. Let someone else be their guinea pig and benefit from their costly learning curves. You don't have to go to Australia to find these answers. • The report indicates that there are real concrete examples of cost savings, but they are all based in Australia. Why do we assume our systems and technologies are on a par with Australia? In general, US technologies and systems are world leaders. • Conclusion: Deny staff recommendation. JB:pk 1 Page 1 of 1 Kyle, Penny From: Monica Ruzich Hamilton [mdruzich@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday,April 23, 2003 8:18 PM To: Kyle, Penny Subject: Copy of Comments to OCSD BOD Meeting 4/23/2003 Ms. Kyle, For your records,attached is the text of the comments I made during the Public Comments portion of the Apol 23,2003 Board of Directors Regular meeting. I only had one copy with me, then had to leave early so was unable to leave it with you as Board Secretary. Thank you. Monica Ruzich Hamilton voice 714.840.8901 4/25/2003 -� Comments to OCSD Board of Directors Meeting,April 23, 2003 HELLO,MY NAME IS MONICA RUZICH. MY ADDRESS IS 5401 KENILWORTH DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649. U REQUEST THAT ITEM#9A BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR. I I AM HERE TO PROTEST PROPOSED ANNEXATION #OCSD-29,THE SHEA HOMES ANNEXATION. THE OCSD AGENDA REPORT BEFORE YOU WITH THE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION STATES AS FACT THAT THIS PROJECT WILL BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THAT EIGHT(8) HOMES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON THIS SITE. THESE SO-CALLED FACTS HAVE NOT YET BEEN DETERMINED. THIS IS NOT A MATTER OF SIMPLE CONSENT. 83% OF THE BOUNDARY OF THIS PARCEL IS UNINCORPORATED COUNTY LANDS. BUT THIS MAP,ON EXHIBIT B, DOESN'T IDENTIFY WHAT THOSE SURROUNDING LANDS ARE. THESE LANDS ARE THE BOLSA CHICA. THAT INFORMATION IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT, WAY TOO IMPORTANT TO BE LEFT OFF A MAP, AND MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS. THIS DECISION CANNOT BE MADE IN A VACUUM—YOU MUST CONSIDER IT IN FULL CONTEXT. ALSO,THE DEVELOPERS OWN CONSULTANTS DESIGNATED THIS PARCEL AS WETLANDS IN THEIR FINAL Elk AND ONLY BY SIGNIFICANT ENGINEERING AND EARTHWORK AND THE ADDITION OF AN ILLEGAL SEAWALL CAN THIS EVEN BE PROPOSED AS A BUILDING SITE. THIS ANNEXATION DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR THE LAFCO UNINCORPORATED ISLAND PROGRAM BECAUSE 83% OF THE PARCEL IS BOUNDED BY UNINCORPORATED COUNTY LANDS, WHICH,BY THE WAY, ARE MADE UP OF THE BOLSA CHICA MESA AND LOWLANDS. THAT 83%,TOGETHER WITH THE PARCEL ITSELF BEING A WETLAND, AND THE REMAINING 17% BEING BOUNDED BY WETLANDS WITHIN THE CITY PORTION, COMBINES TO PREVENT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FROM MEETING THE REQUIRED LAFCO GOALS OF PREVENTING URBAN SPRAWL AND PRESERVING OPEN SPACES. IN SUMMARY,THIS DECISION MUST BE CONSIDERED IN FULL CONTEXT, IT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED IN A VACUUM. GIVEN THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AND THE STRONG OPPOSITION TO THE DEVELOPMENT, APPROVALS FOR ANY PORTION OF THE PROJECT ARE NOT ASSURED. ADD THE RELATIVE MISSTATEMENTS AND OMISSIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT, AND THIS ANNEXATION PROCESS SHOULD NOT PROCEED IN PARALLEL WITH OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY APPROVALS. UNTIL SUCH APPROVALS ARE FINALIZED,THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR CONSENT. PLEASE DEFER YOUR CONSENT. THANK YOU. Y- �3 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE WITH PRIDE DATE: April 23, 2003 TO: Patsy Marshall, City Councilwoman Shalice Reynoso, City Clerk FROM: Jim Biery, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: OCSD—Asset Management, Item No. 12(d) I have reviewed the OCSD, Item No. 12(d) scheduled for your review on April 23, 2003. As we discussed, I have the following concerns: • The driving force for asset management in the public sector has been GASB 34. This is a requirement unique to the United States, but is not mentioned in the proposed work. • The Study, if implemented, should be fully compliant with all aspects of GASB 34 which is not something a firth from Australia would likely have experience implementing. • The staff report implies that the proposed team has not implemented advanced asset management in this country. This is not something we should want to pursue. • Question: "Why would we want to pay them to learn about US technologies and implementation of GASB 34?" • The report states that currently no US based consultant has fully implemented a whole agency advanced asset management program. This would lead the reader to believe that none exists in this country, which is not accurate. For instance, the Army Corps. of Engineers has an advanced asset management program. There are US and Canada vendors that offer advanced asset management systems. • It also appears that Parsons and GHD are teaming up for this project with minimal prior team experience. Let someone else be their guinea pig and benefit from their costly learning curves. You don't have to go to Australia to find these answers. • The report indicates that there are real concrete examples of cost savings, but they are all based in Australia. Why do we assume our systems and technologies are on a par with Australia? In general, US technologies and systems are world leaders. • Conclusion: Deny staff recommendation. JB:pk 1 17 "Let's Talk Water" Otte°CivticiCenterPlaza P.O.Box 19575 Meet the experts in the field of water quality and urban Irvine,CA 92623 runoff as they participate in a lively panel discussion about one of our most valuable natural resources! Wednesday,April 30,7 p.m. Irvine Civic Center• Council Chambers 1 Civic Center Plaza,Irvine Discussion topics: • Our collective and individual roles in keeping our water,streams and beaches dean and safe • New Federal,State and County rules and regulations and how they impact Irvine • Howyou can get involved in this important communityissue For more information,call(949)724-6380,or visit the City of Irvine Website at w %xi.irvineca.us k You are invited to OF -- mA f- aspecialINA�TER 7,y gathering to talk and more about... ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ° ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: ADHI 23, 200 TIME: 7:00 p.m. �a s�- (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... Al — (WILSON) ........................ BANKHEAD...................—G �� Al — (MILLER).......................... BRADY ........................�G A/ — (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ................... ✓ ✓ (AMBRIZ).......................... CAVECCHE................... Y — (GARCIA) ......................... CHRISTY..................... ✓ AJ — (CRANDALL).................... COLLINS ...................... / �L Al — (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE.............. ✓ (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE..................... 029 (WILSON)........................ DUVALL...................... — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. � — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... �L — (POE)................................ JEMPSA...................... �z ✓ — (DAVERT)......................... IASIFHMA............... (SHEA) ............................. KROM........................ i — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES..........................�L �L / — (DOW) .............................. MARSHALL.................. ✓ _/— ✓ — (HERNANDEZ)................. MC CRACKEN............... — (FRESCHI) ....................... MC GOWAN ................. _ + — (BEAUMAN) ..................... MOORE........................ (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............._� �_ t (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ �L (WEBB) ............................ RIDGEWAY................... �L �L — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... (HERMAN)........................ WALKER....................... STAFF: ,ccucKa .e�` Anderson ✓ ��� � Beekman Ghirelli Kyle / �ftwl d+.�ti Ludwin Mathews ril'-IT Miles Ooten Tomko ✓ Streed ✓ OTHERS: Woody Woodruff �f r Nixon 02/26/03 G:\wp.Ela\admin\B$\DIRECTOR\DlrecWm Roll Call.clN REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest 'should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair,speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. "7 DATE: — Z 3-6.3 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) \ HOME ADDRESS: `—J LL5 Ln (number/street VV^A Ugh , C►4 w6y9- Y70? (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: f„71� �n2S -O $ 7CO REPRESENTING: Ch)ca, La'\% 7aj:J— (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair,speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ` 1 O AGENDA ITEM NO. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + NAME: (please print) I HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( 7f� JT 3 6,,/� L4 n �`7 I REPRESENTING: 13� � tci-c- 1-AA"-k :r (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �J ZCX�3 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) MONICA'1 RU:FjC,H HOME ADDRESS: 640 ) KEt`) Il_UXI1 ;nA D-tZ_ (number/street) RC Mr�16T r1 6r-✓ CR , CA 9z(A9 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: y 2?'fl3 AGENDAITEMNO. 6Wc CbW1,411A i g NAME: (please print) J i4Al V�� G 80 HOME ADDRESS: 22 Z r (number/street) (city/zip code) ' TELEPHONE: (*i REPRESENTING: C.il� 6 ' �Rs� Cklcof w5c'p Y"� (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: — 2� U AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/sir et@ ) v (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: al , REPRESENTING: cF (self/name of organization) SIGN-IN SHEET ((�� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT kot l n BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) 1 ES e do AeeXet,c 4-ardvtkA 0o6 Monica Puzlch oFa,- s H'kWP.DrANDMIN1es\FaRMS\SIGN-IN PORM.DDC --� 7r_ J ems+MAYOR L� l` �a /� MAYOR PRO TEM .—E.Fmkim C"CIL MEMBERS 'i ' � CITY MANAGER Claudia C.Alvaler Oa-id N.Ream Liu Big CITY ATTORNEY AIhNu O.Ch,igy — Iaeph W.Flexhe, Mike Qm1a CLERK OF THE COUNCIL 1.SRb,b Fig W E.Healy April 22,2003 W.Blake Anderson,General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 109"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Dear Blake: We understand the Orange County Sanitation District Board is scheduled to vote on a recommended increase in the sewer rate of 15%for Fiscal Year 2003104, Last night,the Santa Are City Council voted to oppose such an increase until they could have time to better understand its justification. Local government and then residents we struggling with the impacts of a sluggish economy and a dire State budget crisis that could have profound impacts in terms of local service reductions and increased taxes. This would seem to be a bad time for a dramatic new sewer rate increase if there are reasonable alternatives to avoid it. We understand the Board's Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee looked at five separate alternatives and that after extensive discussions a 15%increase for this year is being recommended. Additionally,the 15%alternative in the staff reportprojected 1511/year increasrs being needed for the next nine years. These various alternatives assume accelerating construction on important District projects,protecting reserve levels and trying to minimize long-tens financing costs. All of these arc fiscally sd=d assumptions in a strong economy,but may not be the best public policy in a weak economy. We would simply request this item bedelayed until we could better understand other options that don't front load - the Capital Improvement gram or perhaps use some reserves to lessen the increases in the early years. Thank you for considerate of our request. We would welcome a meeting at your earliest convenience to discuss this further and ach a better understanding of alternatives to this size of a rate increase. V urs, gueI A. I eyor cc: Orange County erect n Board of Directors City Council i City Manager 20 CWIC CENTER PIAZ . ,.0 Box 19 SANTA MA,CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE VIal 60-6900 FAX(714)"7.6994 10'd LT:9i ZL idu OCSD Construction of New Trickling Filters t0 b h .Wi lj1'a.o.i6 What Are Trickling Filters? , 50 Trickling filters are a secondary treatment process that use organisms - grown on rocks or plastic media to eat dissolved biodegradable organics (fats, sugars and proteins), converting them into settleable sludge. This process of decomposing waste is the same as what occurs naturally in a stream. We just optimize the process so that what takes days _ in nature only takes minutes in our treatment system. existing trickling fillers The two new modem filters will be 3-story cylindrical structures.The new filters will replace the four old Ilbrer is pumped up to lap andaprW.led smaller filters optimizing the land use to also include dpealre mg deem d.o�8n memzeaa two new clarifier settling basins; adding capacity and I e uarerpm,,to,.a darner to seine new trlekli ng t the heavy mfidporlldes fsludv). improving treatment efficiency The new filters will use fllter rile oeateduxele aus mdl be medfor a plastic media instead of rock, providing more surface oe crotusi Repknishmernsy,lenl P P g d,,mhcnd.ud,vleu,ed through die area for the beneficial organisms to grow. A4„�,ux 3 stones high o<'ea^aice/iM •.1.,u.a.'ouxxt, 166-rootdiameter filled with 20 reef of plastic media 175-foot diameter mostly underground structure WumM Why Will It Take 1,000 Days to Build �.m �-- ___-- awa:„o.M New Filters and Clarifiers? new clarifier wa 30 days -mobilize the contractor on site basin Nueva m 180 days -demolish old trickling filters (including 2,000 truck loads mmae:ma of rocks from existing filters-20 trucks a day) Concrete piles 40-60f•ei in lenggrh mil(be driven drum 180 days-build structure foundations (including 1,096 concrete piles, ones xgmu ulundilhey piles and excavating enough dirt to fill a football field 11 feet high) reach bedmetwetabilise andholdthe veightef 400 days-build structures: pump station, 2 trickling filters, 2 clarifiers the suoe' m, (including laying 3,500 feet of 3.5-to 6-foot diameter pipes) 210 days-startup, testing, commissioning and programming processes Construction scheduled to start June 2003, end in March 2006 ndeoek u,'anwr 1 I18sn1,110403 Id, April 22, 2003 '' nn Y' 4'' ,ems `7hu-�i y1 alc3 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress Data on the level of treatment progress and its impacts on the final effluent are attached. Historical trends for final effluent percent of secondary treatment for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids are shown. In addition, current data for the month's BOD, suspended solids and disinfection effectiveness is shown on a schematic of the treatment system. The Operations division has all of the operationally available secondary treatment facilities online. The Operations divisions continue to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. The final effluent is a blend of 68% secondary treatment and 32% primary treatment, which surpasses our target of 64% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During April 2003, we have averaged 35 ppm TSS and 59 ppm BOD. The secondary treatment goal is 30/30 ppm BOD and TSS. The final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility's disinfection system, which has been in operation for seven months. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. April 2003 results for total coliform averaged about 2,110 MPN/100 ml down from an average bacteria level in the final effluent of 25,000,000 MPN/100 ml prior to disinfection. The final effluent had a maximum 0.17 ppm chlorine residual averaged over six hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm compliance limit. Up to date daily and 30-day average bacteria data is reported on the Web GQ www.ocsd.com. The Board approved the permanent bleach/dechlorination (dechlor)facilities in January 2003 and construction will be completed in the fall of 2003. The permanent bleach and dechlorination facilities will be used until Engineering determines the future technology that will be used for disinfection and designs and constructs the new facilities. RJO:pjm GAwPd1a1u,rn1810tFINALXFU0lBDARD Handoutat042303W-042303 Board Packet Cover Ledecdoc Attachments (2) OCSC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels eon Revision 4122103 Final Effluent lob Percent Secondary Treatment 67% 68% Water 2002 Goal=94% ya so°a Mon ly Averageet 58% cw » 7% Sax s]% J% 50% as% 12-Month Running Average_ age Jan FO Nw /p May ,Fm M Mq aq Otl New doe Jan FW Mar 2002 2003 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) aF+ in Final Effluent Man in Final Effluent 100 tp 1991,Permit Imi = ppm Is ._.. W ._ ._.._.... . p ............. .. ._ ._.. . _ _....... __.. __ _ . t0 ...... .....ry. .. ».. 73 7e le p TO Te . ...._........ .. ......__. .__. .. ...___.. .. .._. p ..... .._ _.p.... . 1998 Pa7mil Limit=BO PPm ae p p eg W a) a5 _ ae_17__.._ W a a0 30 Sewntlary ehntlartl Goal=30 ppm 20 Secondary Standard Goal=30 ppm 10 o g Jan Feb Mar 7W May Lm LJ Aug Sep Oct Now Dec Jan Feb Mm Apr Jan Feb Mn AN .1 Jnn A,I 1.1 Sep Oct Noe Dec 1s1 Fee Mar AN 2002 2oaa 2. tom � a Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Last Fiscal Year 2001 -02 Progress to Secondary Standards Ending June 2002 Month: April 2003 47% 1 32% Advanced Advanced Primary Ocean Pipeline Primary Ocean Pipeline water - water DIalMaeeon a Mixed Maad Dachlorinadon 53% 68% amine nw''z,zooz Secondary Final Effluent: Secondary Bacteria Reduction: 99.99% BOD = 72 ppm TSS = 51 ppm Goal: 99.7% Reduction Chlorine Level Ocean Discharge Daily Maximum: 0.17 mg/L Permit Limit: Permit Limit—Daily Maximum 1.45 mg/L BOD = 100 ppm (Average of Eight Samples) TSS = 60 ppm Final Effluent: Final Effluent Go BOD = 59 ppm BOD = 30 ppm TSS = 35 ppm TSS = 30 ppm STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on 2003, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on , 2003. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /�'lay of , 2003. AY14 Penny M. Kyl , Secretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District GAWRI)TAXADMIMO MFORMAGENDA CERTIFICATION,DOC ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT April 16, 2003 plane: 0141962-2911 fan: To the Chair and Members (7141962-0356 of the Board of Directors emea.ocea.com mailing address: Subject: Board Letter 60. 17-9127 Fnpnt2m Vain,,CA 92729 912J The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional .wags.Avenue information on an of the items, lease call me. 10944 Ellis Avenue Y P Faum9208-7Valle,OA 92]OB-J019 National Recognition for OCSD Mamtar Agencies G. Tracy Mehan III, EPA's Assistant Administrator for Water, is the top • water/wastewater specialist at the U.S. EPA in Washington, D.C. In his April 15 citi.n speech "Investing in America's Water Infrastructure,"to an investment group at the nnahein Global Water Conference he talked about OCSD's asset management program Brea (starting at the bottom of page 5 of the attached transcript). He was offering four eaena Park directions that water utilities could pursue to deal with the challenges of increased cypress demand and future costs, including better management using asset management Pountem eaten techniques, efficiency, full cost pricing and watershed approach. He also mentioned Fullerton 4 Y, P 9 PP Garden Grove environmental management systems (EMS)as another tool that can help manage Huntington Baaah better and reduce costs. The District recently went through an extensive EMS audit lrome Le Habra leading to certification in the future. Mr. Mehan stated that"EMS and asset La Palma management can complement each other and give utilities a powerful way to Los Alamitos continually manage for better results and greater efficiency." Nawpart Beech Orange Pleaenua I recommend that you read Mr. Mehan's speech in its entirety. sates Ana Seel Beech Stenten Can Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III Vila Perk iiaMa Linda The US Geological Survey(USGS) recently issued a Fact Sheet(included as an County of orange attachment)summarizing the agency's findings related to the summer of 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III. USGS scientists saglury Districts led the investigation team that conducted the studies in conjunction with OCSD Coate Mean scientists. The fact sheet summarizes the information contained in the 30-page Midway City executive summary report presented to members of the OMTS committee on April 2, Witter Districts which will be received and filed by the Board at its April 23 meeting. Additional copies of the Fact Sheet are available from the Communications Department and an Irvin Hanah electronic version can be found and downloaded from the USGS website (htto://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/fact-sheetlfs024-03/). The study concluded: "Although the study identifies several possible coastal pathways by which diluted wastewater may be transported to the beach...there were no direct observations of either the high bacterial concentrations seen in the OCSD To maintom worldclass leadership in weseewats,and to,resource management Board of Directors Page 2 April 16, 2003 plume...reaching the shoreline in significant levels or of an association between the existence of a coastal ocean process and beach contamination at or above AB 411 levels...." Disinfection Update Our final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility's disinfection system, which has been in operation for seven months. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal cofiform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. The March 2003 final effluent results prior to dilution at the outfall diffuser for total coliform averaged about 1,800 MPN per 100 ml, down from an average bacteria level in the final effluent of 25,000,000 MPN per 100 ml prior to disinfection. After a 180:1 dilution across the outfall diffuser, the average total additional total coliform at the bottom of the ocean 4.2 miles away from shore is about 10 MPN per 100 ml. Our final effluent had a maximum 0.12 ppm chlorine residual averaged over six hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm compliance limit. Additional disinfection data is reported on the Web at www.ocsd.00m. The Board approved the upgraded bleach/dechlorination (dechlor)facilities in January 2003 and construction will be completed in the fall of 2003. These bleach and dechlorination facilities will be used until we determine the long-term technology that will be used for disinfection and then design and construct the new facilities. Secondary Treatment Standards Update We have all of the operationally available secondary treatment facilities online. We continue to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. The final effluent is a blend of 68% secondary treatment and 32%primary treatment, which surpasses our target of 64% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During March 2003, it averaged 37 ppm TSS and 60 ppm BOD. The secondary treatment goal is 30/30 ppm BOD and TSS. When it Rains We See More Flow The rainfall for the year will be near average with about 13 inches of rain falling in Santa Ana. The storms have been moderate and the rain has come over a longer period (October through April), which tends to decrease the rainfall impact on the wastewater flows. Board of Directors Page 3 April 16, 2003 The pattern of rain events and the amount of rainfall with each event affect the wastewater flow in different ways. Gentle rains tend to sink in the ground and come into the sewers and increase the average monthly wastewater flow for several months after the rainfalls. Heavy rains tend to get in the sewers through manholes and increase the wastewater flow on the day of the rainfall. In the month of March, about five inches of rain fell, which caused the highest single day rain-influenced wastewater flow. On Saturday, March 15, 2003, we experienced high wastewater flow caused by the rain. Our normal Saturday peak flow is about 300 mgd. On Saturday, the flow peaked at 430 mgd. The outtall design flow capacity is 480 mgd at high tide. The Saturday peak flow occurred at low tide which means the outtall has more capacity. The District's staff has emergency procedures to use for very high system flows and is trained annually in the use of the procedures. The flow experienced on Saturday was close to triggering our placing the Emergency Operation Center into operation to oversee the high flow situation; however, it wasn't necessary. Request from City Engineers Take a look at the attached letter from the Orange County Association of City Engineers. They are requesting that we take more of a leadership role in managing the recently adopted county-wide waste discharge requirements for operating sanitary sewers. Staff is evaluating the request and will develop recommendations for consideration by the OMTS Committee and the Board of Directors in the near future. California's Colorado River Water Use Plan (4.4 Plan) At the direction of the Secretary of the Interior(under both the Clinton and Bush administrations)and on behalf of the other states reliant on the Colorado River for water, the four big southern California water entities, Imperial Irrigation District (IID), Coachella Valley Water District (CVW D), Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MW D), and San Diego County Water Authority(SDCWA)were federally mandated to sign a Quantification Settlement Agreement (OSA) by December 31, 2002, which would commit California to certain water use reduction programs. The OSA was intended to wean California from its reliance on the surplus flows from the Colorado River and return to its annual 4.4 million acre-feet basis allotment of the river. On New Year's Day, as the OSA was not signed, Interior Secretary Gale Norton cut Colorado River water orders for Southern California—denying the state the surplus flow it had relied on for years. Board of Directors Page 4 April 16, 2003 Because the Department of the Interior denied IID its full requested water order for 2003, IID filed a suit in U.S. District Court alleging Interior violated IID's water rights to the Colorado River by not honoring existing contracts. On March 18, 2003, a preliminary injunction was granted preventing Interior from limiting Imperial Irrigation District's water order. Meanwhile, the Southern California water agencies and the state continue to work together to bring the OSA to completion. No one has yet proposed a plan that will effectively achieve California's 4.4 million acre-feet allocation. EPA Releases New Guidelines to Aid City and County Septic System Management EPA has released new guidelines that are designed to help local governments strengthen their management of septic systems and other small, privately-owned wastewater treatment systems. Failing and improperly managed septic systems are a significant source of water pollution, potentially causing contamination of drinking water wells or restricting shellfish harvest. There are approximately 2,500 septic systems in the District's service area. The Voluntary Guidelines for Management of Onsite and Clustered (Decentralized) Wastewater Treatment Systems complements EPA's efforts to help state and local governments strengthen their oversight of septic systems and other small, privately- owned wastewater treatment systems. The guidelines and an accompanying Management Handbook, which is now available for public comment, provide local governments with a risk-based model for evaluating local conditions and then a five- tier system developing an appropriate management program to address local conditions. The Voluntary Guidelines document(EPA 832-B-03-001) is available for download at www.epa.gov/owm/onsite. Copies are also available by calling 800-490-9198. The public is also invited to review and comment on the companion Handbook for Management of Onsite and Clustered (Decentralized)Wastewater Treatment Systems. The public comment period closes on May 27, 2003. For more information, please contact Joyce Hudson at 202-564-0657 or Steve Hogye 202-564.0631. Board of Directors Page 5 April 16, 2003 Community Outreach Warner Avenue Project Approximately 4,500 letters and fact sheets were distributed during the week of April 7 to impacted areas around the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer Project in Huntington Beach. An announcement of a neighborhood meeting was included which will be held on April 29 at Harbor View School from 7 to 8:00 p.m. At this neighborhood meeting staff along with the contractor will be presenting the project and available for questions. Bushard Trunkline Sewer Replacement Construction updates continue to go out to impacted areas, the most recent notification were door hangers that distributed on April 11 regarding the first full street closure of the project. The street closure is scheduled to begin on April 15 at the Atlanta and Bushard intersection. This closure is estimated to be completed by June 30. A map of the closure was included along with the notification to the residents. Articles of Interest I have also included several additional published articles that you might find interesting. If you additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt G\WPOTAWMI"M,LETTERS TO US WMMM1603 BOMD LETTEfl.IX%.' Attachments "Investing in America's Water Infrastructure" Keynote Address to the Schwab Capital Markets' Global Water Conference Washington, DC April 15, 2003 Delivered by G. Tracy Mehan, III Assistant Administrator for Water United States Environmental Protection Agency Introduction - Thank you for this opportunity to address the Schwab Capital Markets Global Water Conference for investors. It is indeed a pleasure to be here. Your focus on the water sector and the role of water in our economy makes this a unique symposium. Three years ago,Fortune magazine (May 15, 2000) published an article describing the$400 billion-a-year water industry and suggested that water companies were betting that"water will be to the 21"century what oil was to the 20th."t Last summer,an article on the water industry in Bloomberg Personal Finance declared: "Water is not only wet. It's hot."2 For those of us who can appreciate these statements, it's important that we step back and look at the big picture as well as emerging issues. The Big Picture I/Tully,Shawn."Water,Water Everywhere."Fonwe.May 15,2000. Z/Picemo,James. "Economics:For Better or Worse,Water is the Wellspring of a New Growth Industry." BLOOMBERG Persowl Finance,June 2002. 2 For the big picture,I go back a couple of centuries to Adam Smith,the 181h c.philosopher - generally credited with laying the foundation of modem economics. Smith described the paradox of diamonds and water and asked: how could it be that water, so essential to life,is so cheap, while diamonds, used only for adornment,are very costly? While Smith used the paradox to explain the basic concepts of supply and demand and to show that prices reflect relative scarcity, today the paradox provides a troubling description of the role of water in our economy. With our enormous population and economic growth,our fresh water supplies are stretched more than ever. Meanwhile,Americans spend more than ever on discretionary items. Instead of diamonds, I'll compare our water and wastewater bills to what we're paying for soft drinks. American households spend an average of$707 per year on soft drinks (carbonated)and other(non- carbonated)refreshment beverages compared to an average of$474 per year per household on water and wastewater charges." Clearly, our prices and expenditures hardly reflect the true value 3froml remil sales for bottled beverages in 2001 were obtained from the Beverage Digest Fact Book 2002, Beverage Digest Company,Bedford Hills,NY. Website: htm://www.beveraee-diaest.com Total retail sales for 2001 carbonated,noncarbonated and bottled water was$82 billion. Dividing$82 billion by 116 million households in U.S.(obtained from U.S.Census information at http://quickfacts.census.gov/hunits/states/06000.hud)yields spending of $707 per household per year. These calculations were made by Holly Stallworth,Ph.D.,EPA Office of Water economist. a/Raftelis Financial Consulting 2002 Water and Wastewater Rate Survey reports an average of$474 per household per year for combined water and sewer bills.httpJ/www.raftelis.com/survey.htm 3 of water. As we spend more on non-essentials (like soft drinks) and less on essentials (like - water), the paradox of diamonds and water weighs heavily on us all. Properly valuing our water resources strikes me as a threshold issue, one that defines how we deal with water issues. Let's look at the issues in the water sector and some ways in which we can bring our prices and expenditures a little closer to the true value of water. Rising Costs for Water Infrastructure Our pipes and plants are aging; maintenance is too often deferred; and, as a result, we can expect sharply rising future costs for repair and replacement of water infrastructure. In most cities and towns, the pipes used to distribute clean water and collect wastewater have passed their life expectancy. In fact, based on the dates when most of our water pipes were laid, we can expect a large wave of financial obligation to replace these pipes in the coming decades. Dubbed the "Nessie Curve" by the Australians, it is named after the Loch Ness Monster because so much of this financial obligation (like our pipes) lies beneath the surface. Last September, EPA issued a report that talked about "a gap between projected clean water and drinking water investment needs over the twenty-year period from 2000- 2019 and current levels of spending."5 We pointed out if investment in water and wastewater systems remains flat and does not increase, we expect a "gap" to occur. Under the flat investment or"no revenue growth" scenario, we estimated a clean water capital payment gap of$122 billion (the mid-range estimate) over the 20 year time period. Our midrange estimate for the drinking water capital payment gap is $102 billion for the"no revenue growth"scenario. We acknowledge tremendous uncertainly associated with the analysis. In fact, we put out the report more to encourage a policy discussion of the challenges confronting the nation's clean water and drinking water systems. Our"revenue growth scenario" is dramatically different. If, instead of flat investment, revenue and spending grow at 3%a/year over and above inflation, our mid-range estimate for the clean water capital shortfall drops to $21 billion and to $45 billion for drinking water capital. 5/EPA-816-R-02-020, The Clean Water and Drinking Water Infrastructure Gap Analysis,Office of Water.September 2002. Website: http://www.epa.gov/ownVgaprepon.pdf 4 • Obviously assumptions are very important—but so are choices. Where we fall between these two scenarios depends on us. Addressing Future Challenges: Four Ways Today's challenges demand a multi-faceted approach to managing and sustaining our infrastructure assets. Not only are we going to have to manage better in both the public and private spheres, we're going to have to use less water,or at least use it more efficiently, and pay more of the full costs of infrastructure. I'd like to offer four directions water utilities may wish to pursue in order to deal with the challenges of increased demands and future costs: 1. Better Management 2. Efficiency 3. Full Cost Pricing 4. Watershed Approach. Better Management In the Office of Water, we've been looking at the potential for asset management techniques to reduce a utility's long-term costs and improve performance. This is a structured management approach that is based on information about the condition of a system's assets. Knowing the condition of your assets and linking that information to inventory, service levels, useful life,and repair costs will provide the information needed to make optimal management decisions —including decisions about funding future renewal and replacement. Recently, the Orange County Sanitation District approved an investment of$22-38 million,over a six year period, to implement its Asset Management Plan, as part of a$2 billion investment strategy over the next twenty years. This front-end investment in manpower,planning and assistance, information systems, software, training and other process changes will yield a 20 year return on investment in the range of 9:1 to 16:1. This translates into a reduction of$150 million in their capital improvements program and a total life cycle cost savings of at least$200 5 million. 6 This 10% savings from just one utility, admittedly a very large one, is equivalent to the current full amount of the federal contribution to California's Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF)over two years! Environmental management systems (EMS)are another important tool to help utilities manage better and reduce costs. The EMS approach involves a comprehensive assessment of an organization's impact on the environment followed by specific targets and objectives and continual checking to make sure the desired results are achieved. EMS and asset management can complement each other and give utilities a powerful way to continually manage for better results and greater efficiency. 6/The full text of this plan can be found on the Orange County Sanitation District website at http://www.msd.conL/aboutimportdspwial-studim."p- 6 Back in 1998,the National Association of Water Companies issued a report that compared the water industry to the electric and natural gas utilities. One overwhelming observation from that study still stands out. The water sector is far more fragmented than the electric and natural gas utilities. There are some 54,000 drinking water systems versus 3200 electric and 2700 gas utilities. EPA has found that, oftentimes, there are cost savings that can be achieved by small systems through consolidating ownership or management with other small systems. Although consolidation is not always a viable option,by combining resources,systems can achieve a more sustainable level of technical, financial and managerial capacity. For instance,the system serving the city of Panora,Iowa consistently violated the public health standards for nitrate in drinking water. Rather than incur the cost of installing treatment, the city decided to purchase raw water of a higher quality from a neighboring system. In addition, the city pursued a partnership agreement with another neighboring system to assist with operating and monitoring its water treatment plant. This agreement enabled the city to take advantage of the other system's technical expertise and reduced the need for on-site operators. I probably don't need to remind this audience of the importance of the private sector in the provision of clean and safe water. This is particularly true on the drinking water side where nearly 70%of systems are privately owned. In appreciation of this fact,Congress, in its 1996 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act, made investor-owned utilities eligible for loans under the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund(DWSRF). Approximately 10% of the 2400 loans provided since 1997 under DWSRF has gone to private systems and 4.5%of the$5 billion in assistance provided has gone to private systems. Public-private partnerships and private companies have helped a number of communities provide both water and wastewater treatment at reduced cost. Whether providing basic water or wastewater treatment supplies (e.g.,chemicals), maintaining a portion of the collection or treatment system under a contract,or providing contract operation and maintenance for all of a r/National Association of Water Companies and Beecher Policy Research,The Water Industry Compared. Structural,Regulatory, and Strategic Issues for Utilities in a Changing Context, September 1998. 7 municipality's facilities,the private sector can serve an important role in the effort to maintain - water quality across the country. Over the past decade,we've seen an increased interest in using the private sector to meet water and wastewater funding needs. A Presidential Executive Order (12803) was issued in 1992 directing federal agencies to remove obstacles to privatization. My staff works with the Office of Management and Budget to review and approve a number of these privatization agreements for wastewater systems every year. EPA recognizes the efficiency advantages that can accompany privatization or public- private partnerships. Nevertheless, our overriding interest is in fostering management excellence in water systems —whether government-owned or investor-owned. Efficiency In addition to managing better,we're going to have to learn to use water more efficiently. With 8% of the world's fresh water, the United States is relatively blessed; yet even our eastern states are beginning to suffer water quantity problems;and on both coasts, we're reaching the end of the era in which we could always expand water supply. At the very least,the marginal cost curve for expanding our water supply is very steep indeed. Demand side management is needed to complement our supply side approach. During the next 100 years, we're going to have to become experts on the demand side of the equation: conservation,recycling, reuse and improved water-use efficiency. If we can reuse our treated wastewater for beneficial purposes such as irrigation,manufacturing or groundwater recharge,the environmental and economic benefits are manifold. If we can bring metering to those communities that still lack the means to measure their consumption,then we've provided a basis for price incentives to begin to work.For example,Westfield,Massachusetts went from no meters to a fully metered system. The installation of meters enabled the city to set a metered water rate that allowed for complete cost recovery of its existing and projected expenses. Also the city found that it could abandon plans to develop a new surface water source, as its customers began to conserve water. Imagine the water savings if cities the size of Chicago and Sacramento fully metered their systems. I want to salute Mayor Daley for his recent announcement of Chicago's plan to meter 8 r 350,000 households presently charged a flat fee. This will result in conserving precious Lake - Michigan water while sustaining the City's infrastructure for a long time. Metering and reuse aren't the only ways to save water. Many of you probably know the other options available for enhancing water efficiency: plumbing retrofits, leak detection and repair, irrigation improvements, water-saving appliances, landscaping measures and public education. Using these measures, a number of American cities have reduced their water use by as much as 20%and still haven't exhausted all their conservation options. Many of these cities are featured in our publication, Cases in Water Conservation. 8 EPA has a number of resources available to assist water efficiency efforts. We published the Water Conservation Plan Guidelines in 1998 for public water systems and we sponsor a voluntary partnership program for businesses and institutions called WAVE(Water Alliances for Voluntary Efficiency). On our website9 you can also find a number of other publications and links to WaterWiser, the water conservation clearinghouse that we started in conjunction with the American Water Works Association.10 Full Cast Pricing The most obvious way to address the discrepancy between the value of water and its price is through the price mechanism. At a minimum, we're going to have to pay more of the actual costs of maintaining our water systems Over time. A cost-based rate structure that incorporates all of the costs of building, maintaining and operating a system into the price is called full cast pricing. We regard this as essential for sustainable infrastructure. When cost-based pricing is supplemented with incentives for consumers to conserve, we move into conservation pricing. You can read more about these different types of rate structures for water and wastewater pricing s/ EPA-832-H-02-003,Cases in Water Conservation, Office of Water,July 2002.Website: http://www.epa.gov/OW-O W M.htmllwawr-offi'ciency/utilityconservation.pdf 9/The Office of Water's wcbsite is http://www.epa.gov/ow/. to/WaterWiser is a water efficiency clearinghouse and website initiated with funding from EPA and maintained by the American Water Works Association. http://www.watemiser.org/ 9 in a paper written by one of our economists and posted on our websitet t. - t t/Holly Stallworth,Ph.D.,Office of Water,EPA,"Conservation Pricing of Water and Wastewater," http,Hwww.eyasov/owmtwater-efficiencv/"ter7.pdf. 10 r The Congressional Budget Office recently issued a report entitled Future Investment in Drinking Water and Wastewater Infrastructure(November 2002)which points out that increased future infrastructure costs will either have to be paid by taxpayers or ratepayers 12. To quote CBO: "Ultimately, society as a whole pays 100 percent of the costs of water services,whether through ratepayers'bills or through federal, state,or local taxes."CHO raises strong efficiency arguments for ratepayers picking up the increased costs rather than taxpayers. Certainly the most direct route for funds to flow is straight from the ratepayer to the utility. In addition, we know that when prices rise,quantity demanded falls. Moreover, in this same report, CBO estimates that combined water and sewer bills currently average 0.5% of income in this country(i.e. one half of one percent of average household income). There appears to be room for higher water bills among most households. In a recent draft report from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,13 the United States had the lowest percentage of income going to water charges among the 18 OECD countries for which data was available. CBO,in its report,calculated that even if future infrastructure needs fall into the very high range, average water bills Will still only account for 0.9% of income on average. In a recent article,Harvard economist Robert Stavins describes our water prices as "muffledi14. He suggests that ratepayers need to hear stronger price signals so that they see a connection between their consumption and their water bill. tz/Congressional Budget Office,Future Investment in Drinking Water and Wastewater Infrastructure, November 2002,ISBM 0-16-01243-3. t3/OECD, 11-20-02 Draft,"Social Issues in the Provision of Water Services"Table 2-2. ta/Sheila M.Cavanagh,W.Michael Hanemann,and Robert N.Stavin,"Muffled Price Signals:Household Water Demand Under Increasing-Block Prices,"December 31,2001 ASSA Paper. 11 This is not to overlook the affordability problems that low-income households may face.To alleviate these hardships, communities can offer rate structures that mitigate impacts on low- income customers. The most prominent example is `lifeline rates" where the charge for an amount of service considered non-discretionary (the minimum sanitary requirement)is kept low, but then higher unit charges are levied on water consumption beyond that amount. Affordability programs are offered by only 14% of water utilities.35 There is still much to learn from the gas and electric utilities in their many years' experience in offering low-income assistance. We want rates that are affordable for most households,but not so "muffled"that we can't hear a price signal,a signal which conveys important information on the condition of the infrastructure which it supports. Differential pricing would reconcile equity and efficiency. The Watershed Approach Finally,in addition to managing better, using less and adequately pricing services, we're going to have to use the watershed approach to target strategic,cost-effective actions to meet water quality standards. EPA views watersheds as the basic unit to define and gauge the nation's water quality. The watershed approach is a term generally invoked to mean broad stakeholder involvement, hydrologically defined boundaries, and coordinated management across all aspects of policy that affect water. Leading the way are over 4,000 local watershed organizations in the U.S. working to advocate watershed restoration, source water protection,improved site design,erosion control, land conservation, stormwater management and many other aspects of water resource management. I have asked EPA's senior managers to identify ways to advance the watershed approach, including how to increase our training and technical assistance for these local, state, and tribal watershed partnerships. Several facets of the watershed approach can be advanced by jurisdictions at all levels to reduce the cost of future infrastructure. I'll mention just two: "/Raftelis Financial Consulting,2002 Water and Wastewater Rate Survey. Ordering information for this publication is available from http://www.raftelis.com/. 12 I. Targeting. Under the 1987 Amendments to the Clean Water Act and the1996 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act, Congress created the State Revolving Fund programs to provide a water infrastructure funding resource in perpetuity. To the extent that flexibility is available under these Amendments, federal, state, local and tribal governments need to target those watersheds and projects that have the greatest impact on human health issues, sources of drinking water and ecosystem protection. Some 19 states use an integrated planning and priority setting approach so that highest priority water quality problems are addressed first with Clean Water SRF funds. This integrated approach helps direct SRF funds toward projects with the greatest water quality benefit- particularly those nonpoint source control and estuary protection projects that can,in many situations, reduce the need for more costly point source controls. The Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 encourage a watershed approach to drinking water protection. As directed by the Amendments,each of the states has developed a Source Water Assessment Program which analyzes existing and potential threats to the quality of drinking water. States may use funds from the Drinking Water SRF to conduct source water assessment and protection activities including land acquisition and wellhead protection. Protecting drinking water sources from contamination in the first place has been shown to reduce costs significantly. An EPA study has shown that prevention can be up to 40 times more cost effective than remediating or finding new drinking water sources.ts Cleariv, targeting our assistance to control nonpoint sources and protect source waters are promising ways of bringing down the costs of future infrastructure. 2. Watershed Trading. Watersheds are ideal for experimenting with market-based incentives; and our Water Quality Trading Policy 7 released on January 13a' of this year renews our efforts to pursue water-quality trading for nutrients,sediments and other 16/EPA-813-B-95-005,Office of Water,Benefits and Costs of Prevention: Case Studies of Community Wellhead Protection- Volume 1. 1996. t7/EPA,Office of Water,Final Water Quality Trading Policy, January 13,2003. Website: http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/trading/finalpolicy2003.htnd. 13 pollutants to reduce the cost of compliance with water-quality based requirements. With this policy, we're supporting states and tribes in developing trading programs that meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act. A water quality "credit" could be created by reducing pollution loads beyond required levels (e.g.,for an NPDES permittee, reductions below a water quality based effluent limitation). For example,a landowner or a farmer could create credits by changing cropping practices and planting shrubs and trees next to a stream.A municipal wastewater treatment plant then could purchase and use these credits to meet water quality limits in its permit, thereby taking advantage of differentials in pollution control costs. Our policy supports trading among and between regulated and unregulated sources. In its analysis of the Clinton Administration's Clean Water Initiative,EPA concluded that the total potential savings from all types of trading range from$658 million to $7.5 billion annually. A current example of a successful trading effort, between point sources only,can be found on Long Island Sound where nitrogen trading among publicly owned treatment works in Connecticut is expect to save over$200 million in control costs. A study of three watersheds in Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin by the World Resources Institute (2000)ts found that the cost of reducing phosphorous from point sources, traditional pipe-in-the-water dischargers, was considerably higher than those based on trading between point and non-point, or diffuse, sources of runoff which are not regulated by the Clean Water Act. The estimates for point source controls ranged from $10.38 per pound of phosphorus in the Wisconsin watershed to $23.89 in the Michigan watershed. Using trading between point and non-point sources,these costs could be lowered to$5.95 per pound in Wisconsin,a reduction of over 40%,and to$4.04 in Michigan,a reduction of over 80%. Clearly, if we use some of these watershed techniques, we can more efficiently address clean water and drinking water needs. ts/Paul Faeth,Fertile Ground:Nutrient Trading's Potential to Cost-effectively Improve Water Quality, Washington,D.C.:World Resources Institute,2000. 14 Conclusion - In conclusion, I've suggested 4 broad directions that both privately owned and publicly owned water utilities should pursue in order to better capture the true value of water: better management, efficiency,full cost pricing and the watershed approach. Those of you involved in the water industry probably have numerous other ideas for enhancing our stewardship of America's water resources,and I'd be interested in hearing from you. The provision of clean and safe water for the 21'century is sufficiently challenging as to demand the energy, talent and creativity of both the private and public sectors. I welcome your contribution to this important work. Thank you. 15 QEA0C 0 \l The City Engineers Assaiadon.. .,., . .. of Orange County _ .. FA 1966 April 7,2003 Bosid ofD6ecro+a 200 �K.nneth H. Rosenfield Pmddent Mr.Blake Anderson,General Manager Rslr of Lama Hills Orange County Sanitation District D.Id W&I, ` 10844 Ellis Avenue Vice Preswwt : Fountain Valley,CA 92728 City of Hoadagooa Bad SUBJECT: COORDINATION OF COMPLIANCE EFFORTS FOR SEWER WASTE Stephen Barium DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS(WDR)ORDER NO R8-2002-0014 3e.Temrr/1'reaearec Dear I&Anderson: Cityof Newpon Brach Part PRddmm. Thank you for meeting with several members of the City Engineers Association of Orange Ti.Seiler County on March 10n to address our mutual interests with the Sewer WDR issued to sewer City of Tue6a collection agencies in North Orange County on April 26, 2002. The Order requires the Phil Wy ty.QfBm development and implementation of multiple 'Plans;' which sure intended to control or tyofB eliminate sanitary sewer spills.As discussed,we should all work together on this issue. am*Hw. OCSD has accepted responsibility as the lead in the establishment and coordination of committees, a good formn for the discussion of issues and exchange of ideas. Although this Hud,La is beneficial, we would like open discussions with OCSD to explore the possibility that IImwb:i.. ro.o.dla OCSD assume a greater role in the compliance related efforts required by the Order. mup Pem Ada.C.Hwe. ars.bandm The role that is foreseen may be similar to that which the County of Orange has taken in the 0"Dje6i'"' administration of the Municipal NPDES Permit. Orange County,as Principal Permittee,has 8-ae„ hie. been very successful in its designated role in coordinating and guiding the efforts of the w^ne orbnm. cities, the Co-permittees. This structure has allowed those involved to realize efficiencies G.Bmm Mm Gmeer•M.a and economies of scale, and has provided opportunities to acquire the services of some of B°b'` ` . the foremost technical experts in the field of surface water qual G ity protection. ur e]oM+nn — Bnymb,B.Nd —� s jo"m"S On behalf of the City Engineer's Association, with representation of al] affected cities, we .mmis.lobmm� PwIC.k request a continued dialogue with you and your staff to discuss how a more efficient and, p"'`'°'`n effective moeam mi t be created to the benefit of all agencies involved We look forward I1oh.n P.Biadlq em P:AAa^ to working closely with you and your staff. Please let me know how we may proceed. D.l.m.n T.d Simon Dmwab Sincerely, Bale.memn Bob Hdwn OmBeMwe. 7 l/ bmae Noo,b.loh /tT' BM Pnueall Bw Kenneth H.Rosenfield,P.E. M"'wv„„ Director of Public Services,City of Laguna Hills . President,City Engineers Association of Orange County Pertieip,dng Cider A.du'a,Biro.&v.Pm{Cml..Cana M.m.C-p w,,Dino Para Fumbu,Va/dy Fd&ran,Gmdrn Gina Ffuwuarn Bmrb.Irvm.lagm.a BreA,Lsywv Hdd. �all vpmw.a.ln H.em,rAI Fa 1.P.a..�Abvfm,M:.oa.Vie,Npmr&md.pea..Pbenaa Bmrdesmu.Mm4m S.ebnma S.J. s.ao Am,smrBm.a.rf.l..r.ma vu6P.q�.+....,rmenlaa,e..daP.ea,a PoBlie Bgeeet®:remm_Dumnra.omwr nP.Eer Fodbder�aeaag TroupmWe.Arb.'ry,Tmnpl—Ce,R A#.drr DTI.pored Ce.d ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT >OF 2 Memo To: OCWD Board of Directors From: Ron Wildenmuth CC: Virginia Grebbien,John Kennedy,Craig Miller, Mike Markus Date: April 9,2003 Re: Possible Editorials Critical of Water Reuse As you may know, a State Recycled Water Task Force was established to develop strategies and policies for new water reuse projects that would produce 200,000 acre-feet of new water annually in Califomia. The Task Force is scheduled to release a report with its top 13 prioritles on April 29. In anticipation of the reports release, several long-time opponents of water reuse from the Los Angeles area have been engaging in media activity throughout the state to voice opposition to the Task Force and its recommendations. I wanted to make you aware of these activities, so you are not alarmed If you come across opinion editorials or letters-to-the editor that are critical of the Task Force and water reuse in general. An opinion editorial from two opponents ran in the Sacramento Bee this week. We have sent a letter and talking points to the state elected officials who support the Groundwater Replenishment System to reassure them that the System is a model water purification project utilizing state-ofthe-art technology that will produce safe, high-quality water. (Copies of the article, letter and talking points follow.) Were continuing to monitor the situation and our Communications staff members are prepared to address this issue if the opponents move into Orange County. We will keep you apprised of any new information. If you have any questions, please call me at(714)378-3351. Ir - � r . ` _ ._, Sa. J1/1 �I1r, fIJ�d 1J.P,'O r'11JJJ1JJJ>'JI1�j �J>'�d111JP1Jt > 9 N _ O 1 iL 7 c_ strategic Asset- IVlanagementPlanning How the Orange County Sanitation District adopted the TEAM approach Douglas Stewart, Bill Kennedy, Lynn Norton, Roger Byrne, and Duncan Rose In April 2002,the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)embarked on a multi-year journey to change itself into an "asset-centric" organization using advanced asset-management principles,processes,and methods pat- terned after organizations in Australia and New Zealand known to have the world's best practices in this field.As anyone familiar with asset management can attest, "journey"is an accurate description of what OCSD is undertaking. Our reason for making this Journey is quite simple with anunderstanding of risk,the consequences of fail- OCSD realizes that the services it provides Its cus- we,the levels of service we provide,and customer tomers depend on infrastructure assets and that the expectations,leads to acomprehensiveassetcentric Proper management of these assets is essential to managemertapproach.This,in tum,allows our entire attaininglowest total lifecycle costs,sustawbledeliv- organization tofocus on our most important mission ery of services,appropriate Infrastructure reinvest. —managing and sustaining our infrastructure for men and maintenance programs,and Intergenera. today and the future tional infrastructure equity(ensuring that the ability of public assets to service future generations istaken GeWngSfelhd into amount when today's decisions concerning the In March 1996, after OCSD had undergone an assets'creation,use,and upkeeparemade).In short, external competitive assessment,ourorganization's assets are our business—but what does becoming O&M Department formed the Dlstricl Assessment assetcentric entail? and Reinvention Team (DART)to close the com� The first step involves understanding our assets petitive gap suggested bythe assessment-The DART (collectlow systems,treatment plants,outfais,and Initiative,which will be completed by October 2003, other civic assets)from a lifecycle cost perspect[ve: resulted in anumbe of newwork practices,policies. in other words,knowing what asses we own,what and procedures,including reorganizing O&M to gain Condition theyre In,and how and when they are like- efficiencies,instituting a managed maintenance pro- ly to fail.This Intense focus on our assets.combined gram,establishing a planning and scheduling group MARCH 2003 in maintenance,tramingstan in pre- Figure 1. Components of a Total Asset Managemenf ventive and proactive maintenance Strategic flan techniques, and building a com- puterized maintenance manage, People Asset Processes Issues and Practices merit package. In the early stages of the DART initiative,however,it becameappar- Organizational Asset Information ent that the program—with its Issues yy systems focusondepamosenfafimpmvement 7rTotalAsset —could not by itself create organ- Management mtionwideeffectiveness gains.That k Plan kind of systemic change would require a concerted agency-wide eammanhl Data and program integrating all of the orga- Tactics KnoMedge nization's technical disciplines. Aner,much research,in 2000 the staff discovered the International Inpasfnrcture ManagementMonua(a Enables Optimum Stewardship of Assets compendium of assetmanagement _ - - practices being used in Australia and New Zealand.This manual provided OCSD with Clearly,a change in management style is needed the methodology and new management paradigm to to meet these challenges.At OCSD,our new focus is achieve its desired effectiveness gains.In June 2001. on integrated decisionanaking, i.e., capital asset- the Board authorized staff to proceed with the initial baud decisions that run up and down all levels of the implementation of an asset-management program.A organization and across all technical disciplines. Request for Proposals and a Scope of Work were More fundamentally,this new approach embraces issued in November 2001.In April 2002,the Board broad management paradigm that seeks to achieve approved a contract with Parsons/GHDfor the asset- a sustained level of service at the lowest life-cycle management strategic planning effort,which would cost.We call this agency-wide,integrated focus Total prove vital in providing a common vision for asset Enterprise Asset Management(TEAM). management and developing widespread "buyin" Wedefine TEAMas: throughout the organization. management paradigm and a body of integrated management practices... Asset Management and Approach that are applied to the entire portfolio of infra Asset management provides for the systematic structure assets at all lewisulBteOrganization— planning,acquisition,deployment,use,control,and that seek to minimize the total cost of acquiring, decommissioning of capital(infrastructure)assets. maintaining,operating,and renewing the assets... It integrates policy (strategic-level) management, while continuously delivering the service levels system/network(mid-level)management,and open- customers/stakeholders desire and regulators ations management into one focus,thereby achiev. require. _ ing maximum value hom asset perfomunce(as eval- Transitioning an organization into a TEAM-based uated on a performanceperdollar-invested basis).In culture is best accomplished through the use of a short.asset management focuses on the best possible "valuechain"analysis.The value chain(amanage- "stewardship"of substantial community assets by merit concept embraced by corporations around local government officials working in a political enw the world)is made up of key organizational process- ronment. es that must be successfully managed if an organi- Public sector managers have been managing zation is to survive,much less thrive.The chain for assets fordecades.However,it is dear that the prac- an asset-intensive organization is madeup of sizpri- lhcee of the past will not be sufficient to address the mary elements: major challenges that lie ahead.Across our country, 1. Asset processes and practices infrastructure managers are laced with a large stock 2. Asset information systems of rapidly aging infrastructure coupled with increased 3. Data and knowledge growth and regulatory pressures for increased sec- q. Commercial tactics vice from that infrastructure—while also lacing S. Organizational issues diminishing federal and state funds with which to 6. People issues replace or increase the infrastructure base. Figure 1 portrays the relationship of these com- WE&T ponents to the generation of a total assebmanage. • Develop strategies and recommendations for the ment strategic plan.The sin components of the effective deployment of the desired asset- value chain form the structure upon which the TEAM management improvements. program is built. Indeed, the valuecham concept • Identity the structure,accountability,and respor- serves as our benchmark for assessing OCSD's asset. sibikties for Implementation of the entire improve management practices and capabilities meat program. As Figure 2 shows,our strategic plan was deve4 The Shakpc Manning Approach oped using the following fundamental steps: OCSD chose to implement its asset-manage- 1. Measure our asset-management practices ment program In three phases.The first involved against the world's best practices. developing a comprehensive strategic plan that 2. Choose our future level of BAPS. Included a gap analysis between the world's best 3. Analyze the gap between our current prac- assel-management practices and OCSD's current ffces and our future BAPS. practices,setting 3.and 10.year targets based on 4. Identity specific components in our assetm OCSD's chosen best appropriate practices(BAPS). agement improvement program. In the second phase, a detailed implementation 5. Develop a framework for implementing set- plan was developed based on BAPS from the strafe- management improvements. gic plan.The third phase consists of a series of con, 6. Establish the benefits of improved asset-man- tinuousimprovemenl projects lo reach the 3-Rod aganent practices and the likely costs toimple- If}year targets. ment them. OCSD chose to develop a strategic plan,rather 7. Determine next steps. than simply implement a series of separate improve- 8. Develop a strategic plan and framework ment projects, for several reasons.We wanted to analysis. achieve a common vision and understanding of asset 9. Build a knowledge database and agency-wide management,which we felt was key to gaining orga- consensus for our asset-management nizational acceptance and buyin for a new way of program. making business decisions.We also wanted to ensure upfront education on the asset-rna nageme nt process es across the organization and to delemune BAPS for As noted earlier,Australia and New Zealand are OCSD. Finally, we believed that use of a strategic recognized world leaders in advanced asset man- plan was the best way to provide a coordinated, agement. We used a sophisticated and compre- agency-wide perspective on asset management as a man, Figure 2. Road Map of Strategic Planning Steps agement paradigm for all levels olthe organization,rather than 2- a a set of disjointed improvement efforts. OCSD established the fol- lowtg major goals for the �� IMMEN -- strategic planning pra:ass: t • Document."shared vision' -. G•..-9.• '� for desired asset-manage• mend improvements •Fa".,.R'e .. • Identify desired outcomes in qualitative and quanbla five terms. • Develop the business caseto gain support and approval for further development of the asset. management program. �^- • Develop a gap analysis and s .: r•+• needs assessment between OCSD's Crusting state of asset-management prac- j tices Rod our target goals. MARCH 2003 hensive assessment tool developed in Australia staled that OCSD leads the US.water/wastewau (which has been applied to more than 100 utilities industry in implementing advanced asset manag and is calibrated against recognized worldwide ment);however,there are several significant asse asset-management best practices) to objectively management best practices that have not bee measure and evaluate OCSD's current asset-man- deployed at the OCSD or any other major US.util agement practices. ty.The assessment also identified several existin The assessment tool scores organizations on the practices,processes,and tools that can and shoal basis of-confidence level,"a rating that reflects the be enhanced. confidence an organization and Its stakeholders can As Figure 3 shows,the overall confidence lea have in the data,information,and decision-making score for OCSD rose from 47% in 1996 to 68% 1 tools and processes used In relation to the orga- 2002,thanks to BAP changes in both operations an nization's infrastructure and the services those maintenance associated with the DART iniliativ assets provide. Confidence level scores relate and other Improvement programs. However, th directly to the application of best practices—the average large Australian water/wastewater busines use of best practices Improves the quality of all achieved a score of81%,and the top ID%of Australia these factors and so increases confidence levels. water/wastewater businesses surveyed averaged The scores are quantifiable and measurable,and confidence level of90%.Clearly,we had—and hav they provide an objective rating of asset-manage- —more work to do. ment practices.The assessment tool thus can also be used to audit the progress of an organization's Filling the Dap development of asset-management practices. The next step in our improvement process was I, Through a combination of information gather- identify the appropriate level of asset managemetm ing,structured interviews,and comprehensive work- for OCSD.A second round of workshops,nwnerou shops, an assessment of OCSD's current state of interviews, and a comprehensive gap analyst asset-management practices was performed (see process led to a consensus regarding the TEN Figure 3).The assessment showed that OCSD cur- improvement components needed to"fill the gap.' rendy perlomEs with excellence in many areas(in fact, OCSD's Asset Management Committee,Executiv the US.Environmental Protection Agency[EPA)has Management Team,and other staff members collat ®^, Figure 3.Gap matrix Showing 3-year and BAP Targets i r e i i E s E r 3 35a�8 .a R i S[ 5 E111g L S Ts e a ...r.XumN. M!EMM am u` r�Pa.n<e u. i 4T r�Ynass V: TJ M�gc�ne. 6'l i • W W NI CYm • N Y Y N q q q q M M N U fYmi 8w CNiY q ti N Y N N N Y N N N q -- q li N N � Yk Y Y q Y Y lr le- R N 1p q >t N q Tt in Y Y N O IM OCSG YM.M N q q Y y Y M Y N it Y 9 N 1] Y ,r Y Y N if — Pn-DarlL—i c�L JVeY TirpilLMl t� aesla�wnalePMw.eLMi WE6T oratively set confidence-level The Knowledge Staircase improvement targets for primary and secondary quality elements. Knowledge based on valid,reliable data and timely,accessible information ties at the Some 1500 specific BAPs were coo- heart of effective asset management.The key is putting that knowledge to good use sidered in the gap analysis Knowledge of: process.In addition,the district • Our level of service(target and actual) decided that deploying BAPS • Existing assets(location and attributes) should be accomplished within 6 • Physical condition of assets(remaining useful fife) into years,with a"progress tar- • Performance of assets get"set for the 3-year point.The • Current use overall confidence target levels • ultimate capacity are 81% for the 3-year improve- Gives us the ability to: ment target and 92% for the 10- • Prediet demand for service from customers year BAP improvement target. • Predict how and when assets will fan The targetsetting process was • Forecast the likelihood of failure actually applied to each quality • Assess the probable consequences of failure element category shown in Figure Which allows us to: 3. When this occurs, a gap is • Analyze alternative operations,maintenance,and treatment options established for each category, • Rank operations,maintenance,acquisition,and renewal on a benefit/cost basis thereby identifying the opportu- • Understand the Interplay between our capital and operations budgets nityfor a specific set ofssset-man- • Optimize operations and maintenance activities agemem improvements.These • Develop and revise strategic objectives for each asset improvements can take the form • Review,and revise plans at suitable intervals of policies,processes,practices, Which,In turn,enables us to: or tools. • Effectively manage the process of asset creation,renewaL handoer and commission- Specific improvement compo- ing,and disposal and/or rationalization nents for the TEAM program were • Confidently provide sustained performance at the lowest lffecycle cost selected and prioritized into two This sort of efficient knowledge management is integral to an asset-management major implementation phases:a3 improvement program and results in increasing levels of confidence in decision making year period and a BAP target set for 10 years.The targets set for each period and the opment through the planning and implementation improvement components used to"fill" each gap phases.it includes a section on TEAM commitments were predicated on the approval and deployment of to the overarching principles of asset management and the implementation strategies contained in the TEAM also contains the following statements,which spell Out Program Charter(discussed below). various facets of the program. Through collaborative workshops,274 individual "Our customers, our peers, regulatory agencies, BAPimprovementswereselect- and other stakeholders recognaeusasbeingirmma- ed for inclusion in the OCSD TFAMprogrun.Theseimprme Figure 4. Knowledge Staircase ments,which are the basis for _ the confidence level targets,are necessary to fill the gap between current practices and targeted BAPs and enable OCSD ATEAM Program to achieve the benefits that can Is ALL About be realized from improved asset Knowledge management. As part of our effort to meet Management Increasing these goals,a proposed TEAM AM I I I Confidence Program Charterwas drafted to Continuous `` rO establish the critical strategic Improve ' / IKNOWLEDGE r framework forthe program.Ther- s + charter,developed as partofthe — r It strategic planning process,pro- j vides the guidance necessary to advance the program's devel- MARCH 2003 i five, efficient, and egedive stewards of OCSD udio- will help the district continue to meet its envi- sbucturemsea and for beungleaden inrotdemerprise ronmental goals. asset management" At an EPAseminer In October 2002,Steve Allbee, This Ederml Stakeholder Perception Statement director of EPA's Project Gap Analysis,estimated reflects how OCSD wants the performance of its that application of the TEAM program approach at TEAM program to be perceived and valued by stake- typical US utilities could result in total Wecyclecost holders outside the organization. reductions of 20%to 30%.The project team found "Our7EMfmission a loplan,create,acquire,maim that a portion of this"typical"cost reduction potem min,operate,rehabilitate,replace,mid diso"Ofasreu flat already has been achieved at OCSD as a result in the mast costefleclive mannerat the required level of the DART program and other Initiatives. ofsewice harpresem and mhaegenerations." With the Implementation of theTFAM program, This Internal TEAM Mission Statement reflects OCSD also Is forecasting 2$year capital Improve- the mission of the TEAM program from an internal ment program reallocation/reduction benefits of OCSD perspective. about $75 million On addition to savings antici- '0CSD will use 7FAM as a primary means of pated from traditional value engineering and pro- reducing total life cycle mimishucMe cosh susmtm gram management efforts already underway);25- ingahighqualtyLevelolSewice.,applying risk mit- year total life-cycle benefits are expected to be ignition and management, meeting environmental $350 million. compliance requirements;and meeting other oiga- Putting aside the significant financial benefits the nizational goals." TEAM program is expected to provide,the impi mm This Key Business Strategy Statement presents ments in service and the environmental and public the strategic intent of the TEAM program;it has been health benefits that wig come from enhanced infra- . proposed that the statement be added to OCSD's key suncturesusGmaliity are themselves ample masons business strategies. to employasset-manmgement principles. A series of specific implementation strategies In addition, the strategic planning process were developed for OCSA which will be deployed already has provided substantial organizational through the planning and implementation phoses of benefits to OCSD.For instance,the objective BAP& theprogram. These strategies are considered to be based assessment allowed the organization tocom- essentialm the successful implementation offhepm- pare Its asset-management practices with recog- gmm,and were developed in a highly collaborative abed beat practices.It confirmed the benefits of the process. They are designed to maximize early ben- DART initiative and Identified additional opportu efifs and ensure that necessary foundational change nitres to enhance OCSD's effectiveness. elements of the program are developed and insfi- The organizational unity,momentum,and focus rationalized." that merged from the strategic planning process we This TEAM Ptogrem implememation Sbategles also profoundly Importantbeiefits to OCSD.TEAM has Statement explains the importance of the TEAM provided OCSD with a unifying purpose and sense of improvements being implemented and also stress- direction.For all these reasons,OCSD is firmly con- es the collaborative process used in developing the vinced that asset management through the TEAM strategies. program is a journey well worth taking. A Journey Worth Taking Douglas Steurart is the asset management pm- Implementing asset-management principles, gram manager at the Orange County Sanitation establishing BAPS, and creating the TEAM pro- District in Orange County,Calif BID Kennedy is a gram dearly constituted a major undertaking.Why director at the Parsons Asset Management Center did OCSD do It? (Pasadena,Calif)and sewed as project manager In short,we did It because the TEAM program for the OCSD AMSaalegic Plan. Lynn Norton a Is expected to reduce the district's total infra- a regional director with the Parsons Asset structure llfe-cycle costs by at least 15% over Management Center and served as deputy project and above the savings already achieved by the manager for the OCSD AM Strategic Plan.Roger DART program and other initiatives.This reduc- Byrne is the national manager(Australia)ofGRO tion In total Iifecycle costs could easily exceed Pry's Life Cycle Asset Management Group and $600 million in value over the life of the assets, served as technical advisor on the OCSD AM based on total replacement asset values that will Strategic Plan,Duncan Rose is a technical dimc- be approximately$4 billion or more.The TEAM for of the Parsons Asset Management Center and program also will help ensure the sustainability sewed as technical advisor for the OCSD AM of the district's Infrastructure and services and Strategic Plan. ® WE(T USGS science for 3 changing world SUPPORTING SOUND MANAGEMENT OF OIJR COASTS ANO SFAS Bacterial Contamination at Huntington Beach, California— Is It From a Local Offshore Wastewater Outfall? Iyuring the summers of 1999 and 2000,beaches at Huntington Beach. California, were repeatedly closed to swimming because of high bacte- ria levels in the surf zone. The city's beaches are a major recreational and commercial resource,normally attract- ing millions of visitors each summer. One possible source of the bacterial contamination was the Orange CountySan - whichtionOistrestreatedwactli;sewage wasttfieff,ewater I ,,1 - r � which discharges treated wastewater _ 4.5 miles offshore at a depth of200 feet.Scientists from the U.S.Geologi- cal Survey and cooperating organiza- tions havebeeninvestigatingwhether Aeach ocean currents and waves transport -- — thewastewatertothebeechos. these h,most years,more man S millmn people visit the wide sandybeaehBs at Hum studies indicate that bacteria from the ` hnglon Beach,California Unmrtunmen,,in recentsummers,stretches of these beaches had to be repeatedly posted with advisories against swimming or even ouHall are natasignificanf source al b'� closed(inset),because levels of we bacteria in the smrmne exceeded State the beach contamination. -=�' public-heahh standards, These closures resulted in serious economic losses to a/ local business communities. 'the wide sandy beaches at Huntington determine the cause of the beach con- To evaluate whether the OCSD out- Beach,Califomia.just south of Los An- lamination at Huntington Beach.They fall could be the source for the bacterial geles,attract residents and visitors alike. invcstigated known sources of bacteria. contamination at Huntington Beach,sci- Typically.more than 5 million people visit such as broken sewer pipes,outflow from entists from the U.S.Geological Survey these beaches each summer,helping to the Santa Ana River-feces of bird popula- (USGS)and cooperating org nivalions support a regional tourism industry of$80 lions in coastal marshes,and the plume million annually. of treated wastewater from the Orange During the summers of 1999 and County Sanitation District's(OCSD) 2000. stretches of these beaches had to ocean omfall,4.5 miles(7 km)offshore be repeatedly closed to swimming or at a depth of 200 feet(60 an).The beach posted with advisories against swim- closures were caused by elevated levels I ) f t— ming, because levels of live bacteria in of three categories of bacteria—total co- I the surf zone exceeded beach sanitation liform,fecal coliform,and entemcocci. t standards in the California Health and These bacteria.which live in the digestive Safety Code(Assembly Bill 411.or tracts of warm-blooded animals including h AB41 I). Because people stayed away humans,are also found in the treated ef- "' s from the beaches, local recreational and fluent discharged from the OCSD oulfall. IDrspholo shows menyenterecoccl factors hi ag. nihaddeme than 5400 times),one type of bacteria beaehflOOl bati1ne55 communities got- Because of(his.It was suspected that indicative of contamination from feces olhemans fered serious economic losses. Coastal mean processes might be bring- or other wean-blooded animals.High tents ofan- Local agencies conducted a variety ing bacteria-rich effluent from the ocean lemcocci have been responsible formanyofthe beach closures at Huntington Beach.(Photo courtesy of studies In 1999 and 2000 to try to oulfall to shore. Centers far oisease Contreland Plannntion.) U S.Dope mum at oat lmmor U.S.Geological Sunny USGS Fan Sheet eN�W lOal BACTERIA CONCENTRATIONS REVEAL GAP BETWEEN NEARSHORE though additional work needs to be done AND OFFSHORE CONTAMINATION it,identify the source of the nearshore body of fresher water, it may be coming 3.9 AM from the San Gabriel and Los Angeles f [igh(hu la Rivers,to the north, which carry urban F .r runoff into the ocean. n]OaM Linn f a4M1mlmm.M1rre Beach closures from bacterial contanti- 0 5 nation continued at Huntington Beach tb Linn 1 in the summer of 2002. Even though the � 0 aaM1mTrem.n.re data show That the OCSD oulPoll plume 5 is almost certainly not the source of that a to contamination,OCSD began chlorinat- Is Linn a ing its wastewater discharge in the fall a — Ministrations of 2002.Samples taken from the OCSD f = to offshore outfall plume since then show to low levels of bacteria,often below detec- lion limits. However, periods of Ware- s rial beach contamination at levels above 0 Linn 4 aaunNnm.nore ARM I standards have occurred at Hun- tington Beach after OCSD implemented to chlorination,supporting the conclusion of the USGS-led study that the OCSD z0 outfall plume is not the culprit in the beach contamination. USGS and its cooperators are continu- 40 ing to investigate how bacteria,other con- taminants,and sediments are transported 0 5 lO b coastal ocean processes not only off DISTANCE aARAUELTOBHO62 MILE) y P y It KILDMETEfl•0.81 MILEI Huntington Beach but also in the larger region off southern California. Such re- In fhesummerolllpi,concennenons ofEscherichia tali(E.toll)bacteria,signal- $ scorch is only part ol'the USGS efforts to cstteraflecelcograminelivn,were meaauredon the beach andthrough the water A0411 column along llnesshallelto the shoreline at Hunbngmn Beach(see map).This A standard protect people's lives and property from diagram is Typical of the bacterial distribution pattern found.4Yhan the beeches have o.� geologic and environmental hazards in high bacteria levels,verynearighme samerarline 1,aboutgA kilometer(O..25mlle) the coastal zones of the United Slates. co- fr..the beach, Is.heseressurable bacteria levels,although much below California health standardsfAB4lq.However,Mere was a spetlelgap bemoan this nearshore 1� contamination and the high levels oftsecteria loundar Line 4,33khrometms(leves) Jnrenrra xu.M.dmr N,rnor,trm1hur.1-re,Jr✓m/.,earn l4urllnmllnur.nnJUnrr Jrxrnr The loeinhavois the ngacar weecnsitan eeeytT(OCSO) orstewoeroabout 0.8 _ Sol by The InwefaSmisg Inan dda were cvnsiN rmgykg,s offshggests a tine?about D.B J.mr,Iv Hi B unit Is IH.Sunday, theroba GCter(g.5fag 9 boar the beech.actsspena/gapsuggests that the bacteria from the BCSB ouHall ere not the some beerene tharcontaminere the beeches. ampnia deeian .1'uxan MrpfrrlJnml Srrna lMnur Observations from the USGS-led offshore about 0.5 mile(0.8 km) from COOPERATING ORGANIZATIONS study provide no evidence that the the beach.This spatial gap suggests that MECAwgHkal Syoame.Im. bacteria found in the OCSD treated-ef- the bacteria from the OCSD outfall are Naval lrelaaane School fluent plume reached any purl of the not the same bacteria that contaminate orange county Saniulron District shoreline at Huntington Beach in signifi- the beaches.The bacteria causing the Styl ifm Aee@a0m .Ines Corrosion. +[r eps laslilme of Travel cant enough quantities to cause beach beach postings and closures at Hunting- Unirerrinol Southern,Cl closures or postings.The data show that ton Beach are most likely coming from when the beaches have high bacteria other sources,such as water from local levels, very nearshore water about 0.25 storm drains,marshes,or some other as larmrremrrsourtrecmre'l mile (0.4 km) from the beach also has yet unidentified source. Us.cmmod,Mail Sam 999 measurable bacteria levels,although Salinity data from the summer of 345 Us Efiverner Parka CA 94029 much below AB41 I standards. However, 2001 clearly show two distinct bodies Ifi501329%42 there was a spatial gap between this of relatively fresher(less saline)wa- help//webewruegs oars nearshore contamination and the high ter—one offshore below the thermocline levels of bacteria measured 2 miles(3.3 associated with the OCSD plume and Sae also USGS Mai Report o3621mrp l/ Ion)offshore below the thermocline in one in shallower nearshore waters.This good be.ws ask The perrrme/d09 s2n. This Fall Sheet and any trades Io rr are avaiia es colors at the OCSD outfall plume.The lowest lev. observation corresponds well to the Too l/000pubs.vorcuts oellxl somrn02403/ els of bacteria were consistently found spatial gap seen in the bacterial data.A]- 8 running hant 4area, AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING April 23, 2003 — 7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 04/23t03 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager 1. 30/30 Monthly Update C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on March 26, 2003 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/03 03/31/03 Totals $9,257,938.01 $6,249,729.11 DIRECTORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than$250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving OCSD. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with OCSD. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. 04/23/03 r Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular Item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an Item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. (1) Receive and file a petition requesting annexation of 4.80 Acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Boise Chica Avenue and Los Patos Avenue, bordering the East Garden Grove Wintersburg channel in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-08, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29- Shea Homes Annexation). b. Approve Agreement with the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans), dated March 11, 2003, providing for Caltrans to pothole District's sewer facilities for positive location at no cost to the District, in a form approved by General Counsel. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, If any. 04/23/03 Page 4 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re April 23, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 26, 2003 to be filed. C. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the April 23, 2003 meeting. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re April 2, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 2, 2003 to be filed. C. Receive and file the following reports in connection with the Summer 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III study: (1) Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III: Coastal Circulation and Transport Patterns: The Likelihood of OCSD's Plume Impacting the Huntington Beach Shoreline Executive Summary, prepared by US Geological Survey, dated March 2003; (2) Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III—Peer Review Panel Summary Report prepared by University of Southern California Sea Grant Program and University of California, Santa Barbara Marine Institute, dated March 2003; and, (3) Receive and file Marine Monitoring Annual Report for 2002 prepared by Orange County Sanitation District. d. (1) Authorize a budget amendment in the amount of$16,555,000 for Advanced Asset Management Improvement Program, Job No. SP-68-2,for development and implementation over a four year period; and (2) Award a sole source consulting services agreement to Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc.for professional consulting and implementation services for Phase 2, Asset Management Improvement Program, Job No. SP-68,for a two-year period,for an amount not to exceed $7,279,124, with option to renew for an additional two-year period for an amount not to exceed $5,683,479 upon Board approval. 04/23/03 r Page 5 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re April 3, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 3, 2003 to be filed. C. Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33.1A, with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of $126,720, increasing the total contract amount to$6,688,181. d. Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Primary Clarifiers 16.31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$54,992 and a time extension of 21 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $70,934,528. e. Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62, with Ark Construction Co., authorizing an addition of$60,399 and a time extension of 396 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $430,399. f. (1) Approve plans and specifications for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Q, Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation - Units D through Q, Job No. SP-73, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4) Award a construction contract to J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Q, Job No. P2.85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation - Units D through Q,Job No. SP-73,for an amount not to exceed$1,485,239. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re April 9, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 9, 2003 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2003. d. Approve SAFETY-POL-102—Personal Protective Equipment Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. e. Approve a 15% increase to the Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee Schedule for FY 03/04, based upon a total Single Family Residence rate of$100.50, and review the user fee structure in one year. 04/23/03 Page 6 f. (1) Direct staff to issue up to$280 million in new fixed-rate Certificates of Participation (COP)debt; (2) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Public Resources Advisory Group, for a two-year period for FY03/04, providing for financial advisory services,for an amount not to exceed $75,000; and, (3)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Orrick, Herrington &Sutcliffe to provide bond counsel services in an amount not to exceed$125,000. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re April 14, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 10, 2003 to be filed. C. Approve Resolution No. OCSD 03-09, a Joint Resolution of the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District, declaring the Groundwater Replenishment System will comply with all conditions recommended by the Hearing Officer of the State of California Department of Health Services. d. Approve and authorize execution of Real Property Lease Agreement with the Orange County Water District,for a 6.69 acre parcel at the intersection of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the City of Fountain Valley, for the construction and operation of advanced water treatment facilities, commencing March 1, 2003 and expiring 30 years after the Groundwater Replenishment System becomes operational, in connection with Article 25 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project, at a cost of$1.00 per year, in a form approved by General Counsel. e. Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD)to Kiewit Pacific Company for construction of Initial Microfittration/Site Power Distribution Elements I & II Project, Contract No. GWRS-2003-1,for an mount not to exceed$17,139,646, with OCWD and OCSD paying equal shares of$8,569,823. 16. Approve Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Huntington Beach, providing for a temporary fire station facility and related staffing costs in connection with Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, in an amount not to exceed$264,500. in a form approved by General Counsel. 17. Authorize the General Manager to submit the Full Secondary Treatment Schedule for the Ocean Discharge Permit Application to the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, consistent with Resolution No. OCSD 02-14, Establishing the Policy for Level of Treatment of Wastewater Discharged into the Ocean. ' 04/23/03 Page 7 18. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel - Potential Litigation. Initiation of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c): One (1) potential case. 2. Conference with Real Property Negotiator(Government Code Section 54956.8): Property: 1221 West Coast Highway, Newport Beach, California, 92663 District Negotiator: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel Negotiating Parties: International Bay Clubs, Incorporated Under Negotiation: Instruct for price, terms and conditions for the purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of subject property. 3. Confer with General Counsel - Potential Litigation. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b): One (1) potential case." b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, it any, on matters considered in closed session 19. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, If any 21. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for May 28, 2003,at 7:00 p.m. 04/23/03 r Page 8 22. Adjournments -',NOTICE TO DIRECTORS:To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days ;preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by 'Directors,the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. ;General Manager Blake Anderson (714)593-7110 bandemon®ocsd.com :Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714)593-7130 Pkvle®ocsd.com :Director/Engineering David Ludwin (714)593-7300 dludwin®ocsd.com :Director/Finance/Treasurer Gary Streed (714)593-7550 gstmed®ocsd.com ;Director/Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714)593-7145 Itomko®ocsd.com ;Director/Information Technology Patrick Miles (714)593-7280 omiles®ocsd.com j Director/Operations 8 Maintenance Bob Ooten (714)583-7020 roolen®ocstl.com Director/Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714)593-7400 mhirelli®ocsd.com 'Administrative Services Mgr. Greg Mathews (714)593-7104 gmathews@ocsd.com 'Communications Services Mgr. Carol Beekman (714)593-7120 cbeekman®ocsd.com ;General Counsel ... _. _ .........___.__.._...___ _Q..Z._______ .....___............................. .....: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Board Secretary's office at (714) 593-7130 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to allow the District to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. 31wp.d1a\agenda\9uard Agendas\2003 Beare!Agendas\032603 agenda.doc i Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING MARCH 26, 2003 OJN� S ANI TgT�oy a ? Cm ea O N HE EN��Q� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 r 03/26/03 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 26, 2003, at 7:00 p.m., In the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken, Chair Bob Hernandez X Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Leland Wilson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz X Alberta Christy Mike Garda X John Collins Larry Crandall X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Brian Donahue David Shawver X Michael Duvall Karl Lynn Wilson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X Alice B. Jempsa Marilynn M. Poe Tony Kawashima X Doug Davert X Beth Krom Christina Shea X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater A Patsy Marshall Jim Dow X Robert McGowan Richard A. Freschi X Roy Moore John Beauman X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Don Webb X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Paul Walker Larry Herman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Carol Beekman; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Jim Herberg; Juanita Skillman OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas Nixon, General Counsel; Don Hughes; Bill Knopf; Randy Fuhrman; Pat McGuigan; Terry Welsh; Jennifer Cabral; Ed Torres; Brent Hayes; Paula Zeller; Robert Craig; Ken Ovrey; Richard Bardin I Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 03/26/03 3. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Acencv Active Director Alternate Director Board of Supervisors Jim Silva Chuck Smith PUBLIC COMMENTS Terry Welsh spoke as Chair of the Banning Ranch Park and Preserve Task Force regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49, and stated that following consultation with staff, he supported the project REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair McCracken reviewed the calendar for the working committees for the month of April. She stated all Directors were invited to attend the April 2ntl OMITS Committee meeting to hear the presentation on Asset Management. It was announced a special workshop will be held on April W at 6:00 p.m.to review the revised capital improvement program and proposed construction schedule for secondary treatment facilities. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported on the progress of achieving 30/30 secondary treatment standards. The effluent quality continues to be in the mid-30s parts per million for suspended solids and the mid-50s parts per million for biochemical oxygen demand. Disinfection is continuing and state AB411 standards are being achieved at the end of the outfall. While the numbers are low, there are still elevated readings at the beach, particularly during high tide events when the storm channels are flushed out. Mr. Anderson announced that there will be a lengthy presentation at the April 23rd Board meeting on three issues related to the ocean environment, including a report on the 2001 Huntington Beach Studies, the District's recent video taping of the ecosystem at the end of the outfall and an overview of the results of last year's ocean monitoring program. In an effort to help the Board become more familiar with some of the things that staff is involved with, a series of presentations at the beginning of the Board meetings will be held. Ed Torres was then recognized who gave an overview of converting chemical odor scrubbers to biotridding filters. Greg Mathews, Administrative Services Manager, recognized Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, for 20 years of service. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 03/26/03 REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held February 26, 2003 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 02/15t03 0 0 Totals $10,205,613.94 $5,326,021.63 Director Brian Donahue abstained on Warrant No. 51036; Director Alice Jempsa abstained on Warrant No. 50863;and Director Mark Leyes abstained on Warrant Nos. 50682, 50712, 50797, 51092, and 51036. The abstentions were due to financial Interests giving rise to potential conflicts of interest. CONSENT CALENDAR NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the February 26, 2003 meeting. Chair McCracken reported on the progress of the Legislative Advocacy Ad Hoc Committee that is meeting weekly. The committee is working with staff and consultants on the Initiatives the District is pursuing. Chair McCracken reported on Items presented by staff and discussed by the committee: a) An update of the NPDES Permit Renewal and Negotiation Process was given by Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services. Once the CIP validation report is approved by the Board of Directors in April, negotiations will begin with the regulators on the compliance agreement. The public will be given multiple opportunities to provide input during the review process. b) Proposed policy that would establish the environmental and social benefits to the community from an abandoned septic tank as being equal to the connection fees (Capital Facilities Capacity Charges)that would otherwise be due to the District, applicable only in cases where properties were developed, occupied and served by septic tank prior to March 31, 2003, was discussed by Gary Streed, Director of Finance. 1 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 03/26/03 The Committee decided to table the issue because of the many impacts that need to be more thoroughly evaluated. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 26,2003 to be filed. 12, DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jim Ferryman, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the March 5, 2003 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 5, 2003 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Phase II Biobickling Filter for Odor Control Demonstration Project Final Report, prepared by University of California, Riverside dated February 2003. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file In-plant Fats,Oils and Grease (FOG) Impact Study, prepared by Brown and Caldwell, dated November 2002. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to finalize negotiations and subsequently award a consultant services agreement with Partners Consulting Services, Inc.for JD Edwards Help Desk Support, Specification No. S-2002-110BD, in an amount not to exceed $180,000,for the period April 1, 2003 through March 31, 20D4 with the option of four additional one year renewals. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Establish a budget of $230,000 for Treatment Plant No. 2 North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank Replacement providing for the purchase of tanks, associated materials and necessary equipment for the emergency installation of chemical storage tanks; and, (2) Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23,for Purchase Order No. 37161 issued to Xerxes Corporation for Fiberglass Reinforced Caustic Storage Tanks, Specification No. E-2003-130, for an amount not to exceed $67,000; and, (3) Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23,for Purchase Order No. 37246 issued to Jamison Engineering for North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank and Piping Replacement, Specification No. S-2003-131,for an amount not to exceed $89,689. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Donahue, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the March 6, 2003 meeting. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 v 03/26/03 The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 6, 2003 to be filed, as corrected. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2,Job No. SP2000-61,with Manuel Brothers, Inc., authorizing an addition of$57,085, increasing the total contract amount to $300,585; and (2)Accept Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61,as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers, and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13,for additional design engineering services,for an additional amount of$10,890, increasing the total amount not to exceed $142,677. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pimie for Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79, providing for additional engineering services for an amount of$192,829, increasing the total amount not to exceed $446,064. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Brian Brady, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the March 12, 2003 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 12, 2003 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2003. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-06, Adopting Policies and Procedures for District's Records Management Program, Records Retention, and Destruction of Obsolete Records, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 02-02. e. It was moved and seconded to approve (1) Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract for an additional $500,000, increasing the total authorized amount from $1,000,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for the remainder of FY 02t03; and, (2)Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract from $1,000,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,750,000 for FY 03/04. Directors entered into a brief discussion regarding temporary and contract employees v. full time employees. Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, advised a written report would be provided to the FAHR Committee in May. In Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 03/26/03 W response to Directors'questions, Ms. Tomko confirmed that delaying a decision to increase the amount for temporary services for FY 03104 until after the report was reviewed would have no adverse impact on District's operations. A substitute motion was then submitted: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract for an additional $500,000, increasing the total authorized amount from $1,000,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for the remainder of FY 02103; and, (2) Delay approval for an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract from $1,000,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,750,000 for FY 03/04. 15. DRAFT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair of the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on March 10, 2003. The Chair ordered the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 10, 2003 to be filed. 16. Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, gave a brief report on the need for the project. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the plans and specifications for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to J. R. Filanc Construction Company, Inc.,for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76,for an amount not to exceed $33,037,000, in a form approved by General Counsel. 17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Drain System for North Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 556, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to Ken Thompson, Inc.,for Drain System for North Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-56,for an amount not to exceed $133,050, in a form approved by General Counsel. 18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a license agreement with SW EPI LP to authorize entrance on SWEPI LP's property for design and environmental study purposes related to Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer& Pump Station Abandonment, Contract No. 2-24-1, at no cost to the District, in a form approved by General Counsel. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 v 03/26/03 19. Actions re approval of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Rehabilitation of Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49: 1) Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager, provided a brief overview of this project. Since the report was distributed, one additional letter had been received regarding the project. He also requested an additional item to receive and file letters and staff responses to the letters needed to be added to the agenda. 2) Receive and file Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, prepared by Environmental Science Associates, dated January 23, 2003; 3) Receive and file written comment letters and District responses to comments on the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Rehabilitation of Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49; and, 4)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-07, Making Certain Findings Relating to Less Than Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station; Contract No. 5.49; Approving Mitigation Measures and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program;Adopting the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration approving projects for Rehabilitation of Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 549; and Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Determination re said projects. 20. Action/discussion re Joint Management Committee activities for the SARI Relocation Project, Contract No. 2-41: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, referred the Directors to an additional memo that was placed in their meeting folders that evening. There hasn't been much progress made to resolve the issues between the District and SAWPA. Thomas F. Nixon, General Counsel, noted a minor correction on the March le memo. The amount due to the District is approaching $3 million. An interim solution to resolve the problem is being suggested. Enforcement action by the Regional Water Quality Control Board will be considered at their May meeting. Authorization to request SAWPA provide the District with a cost-sharing proposal and other matters related to resolving the continuing dispute with SAWPA by April 8 was being requested. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated March 19, 2003; correspondence from SAWPA dated January 23, 2003 and March 18, 2003; and correspondence from Orange County Sanitation District dated December 3, 2002 and March 6, 2003; and authorize General Counsel to submit a demand to SAWPA to provide a proposal of solution by April 8, 2003. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 03/26/03 V 21. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9:The Board convened in closed session at 8:20 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss Agenda Item No. 21(a) (1). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2,and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item No. 21(a) (1). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:40 p.m.,the Board reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Secretary of the Board irectors of Orange County Sanitat District Giwp.dtMagendaSw d Minute Q003 Boa MinuteM022603 minutes dm Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02M5/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 50577 Blue Cross of California & 273,608.50 Medial Insurance Premium 50578 Orange County Sanitation District 537,430.05 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 50579 Southern California Edison 68,677.59 Pow 50580 Air&Waste Management Assoc. 1,290.00 Air Duality Meeting Registration 50581 Airgas Safety 225.65 Safety Supplies&Equipment 50582 American Airlines 4,803.00 Travel Services 50583 AT&T Universal Biller 2,483.12 Telephone Service 50584 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 85.41 Telephone Service 50585 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 50586 Capital Appraisal Service 90.00 Vehicle Accident Claim Appraisal Service 60587 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 50588 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 513.15 Plumbing Supplies 50589 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 50590 GWEA 2002 Annual Conference 1,220.00 O&M Training Registration-California Water Environment Association 50591 CWEA Specially Conference 926.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 60692 Diamond H Recognition 136.02 Employee Service Awards 50593 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 3.044.93 Software 50594 DIRECTV 675.00 Subscription 50695 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 8,305.01 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 50596 Eric Klein 10.900.00 EMT Retreal-Strategic Planning,Communications&Negotiations Training 50687 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 50598 FIMNET Corporation 1,862A9 Software Maintenance Contract Tax 50599 Five Star Metals,Inc. 657.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50800 Franchise Tax Board 337.20 Wage Garnishment 50601 City of Fullerton 91.71 Water Use 50602 GE Supply 14,744.54 (1)Relay Output Board&(1)Interface Board 50603 Government Finance Officers Association 420.00 Membership 50604 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems 2,551.50 Software Maintenance-Mall Manager Inlellitouch System W605 City of Huntington Beach 30.84 Water Use 60608 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 50607 Inti.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,249.75 Dues Deduction 50608 J&B Auto Paris 666.86 Auto Parts&Supplies 50609 J.D.Edwards So.Calif.Users Group 300.0D Membership 50610 Lucci's 14.85 Meeting Expense 50611 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 99.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50612 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 1,676.00 Pump Repairs 60613 Motion Industries 641.84 Pump Supplies 60614 National Bond&Trust 1,769.02 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 50618 NexW Communications 3,492.96 Cellular Phones&Air Time 50616 OCBC: Orange County Business Council 360.00 Engineering Training Registration 50617 OCEA 624.61 Dues Deduction 50618 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 50619 Partners Consulting Services 13,080.00 FIS On-SIM Support-One World XE Migration Project 50620 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 50621 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 493.56 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 50622 Projects Partners 3,275.22 Temporary Employment Services 50623 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,507.48 Employee Life Ins.Premium,Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ina.Payroll Deductions Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50624 RPM Electric Motors 333.87 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 50025 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1,425.30 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 50626 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 368.14 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 50627 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 291.80 Plumbing Supplies 50628 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 50M Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,473.D6 Mechanical Supplies 60630 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers 1,700.00 Temporary Access Survey License-2.24.1 50831 Union Bank of California 4,566.13 Banking Services 50632 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 5DS33 Ver¢on California 815.83 Telephone Services 50634 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 8,740.32 Vision Servlcs Premium 50635 Wastewater Technology Trainers 715.00 O B M Training Registration 50636 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment 50637 WEF 134.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 50638 WOI(Water Quality,Inc.) 350.00 08 M Training Registration 50639 Xerox Corporation 4,174.70 Copier Lease 8 Office Supplies 60640 Gary P.Conklin 1,299.96 Mee0ng/Training Expense Reimbursement 50641 Marcus D.Dubois 814.94 Meetingri-raining Expense Reimbursement 50642 Vladimir A.Kogan 270.23 MeetinglTrainin9 Expanse Reimbursement 50643 John D.Linder 180.00 Meeling/TMning Expense Reimbursement 50644 Chris Maher 182.92 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 50645 Patrick W.McNally 298.15 Meeting/freining Expense Relmbursement 50646 Mark Mutz 250.00 Meeting/fralning Expense Reimbursement 50647 Julian F.Saint 197.34 Mee6ngrrralnirlg Expense Reimbursement 50B48 Mark S.Wilson 250.00 Meelingrriaining Expense Reimbursement 50649 Ferguson,Victor 1.703.86 Employee Computer Loan Program 50650 Hants,Randy 605.55 Employee Computer Loan Program 50651 Satm,Julian 8 Fry's Electronics 3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 50652 SARBS-CWEA 20.00 O B M Training Registration 50653 Susan Zamudio 82.04 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 50654 American Express 25.406.07 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies 8 Services 50655 American Machinery 8 Blade.Inc. 69.574.18 (1)Hydraulic Four-Roll,Double Initial,Pinch Plate Bending Machine 50656 Brown and Caldwell 112,233.67 Prof.Servs.1-98.8 Needs Assessment Study,O 8 M Manuals 8 SOP Development 50657 Carollo Engineers 321,947.09 Professional Services P1-60,P2-60 8 Microfiltralion Demo.Project 50B58 Camilo Engineers 318,724.13 Engineering Services P2-66 60659 Cooper Energy Services 53,378.76 Engine Supplies 50660 CH2M Hill 157,535.35 Professional Services J-40.6 8 J-40-7 50661 Graybar 26.408.59 Software Upgrade 8(10)Enclosures 8 Panels 50662 Hill Brothers 26,739.82 Chemicals-Odor 8 Corrosion Control-Newport TrunNine 50663 IPMC Go Parsons 354.531.00 Professional Services-Project Management Program 506M Kaiser Foundation Health Pion 42,422.69 Medical Insurance Premium 50665 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. 129,072.33 Ferric Chloride NO 9-27-95 50666 Kforce Professional Stiffing 39.771.18 Temporary Employment Services 50667 Lee 8 Ro,Inc. 34.25923 Professional Services P2-47-3 50666 Malcolm Plmle.Inc 160.463.25 Professional Services 1-10 50669 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 32,947.31 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 50670 Voided Check - 50671 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 32.136.01 Engineering Services J-361 Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIA < , Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50672 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 113.191.71 Sodium Hypochlorile 50673 Projects Partners 62.742.51 Temporary Employment Services 50674 So.Cal.Gas Company 30,871.42 Natural Gas 50675 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 38.170.12 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 50676 SPEC Services,Inc. 46,369.22 Engineering Services J-33-1 &P7-89 50677 Tule Ranch 173.026.23 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 60678 U.S.Metro Group,Inc. 36,064.OD Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 50679 U.S.Peroxide 136.494.18 Hydrogen Peroxide 50680 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 31.037.51 Engineering Service J-67 506111 Green Giant Landscape,Inc. 70,665.00 Construction P2-84 SD682 J.F.Shea Construction,Inc. 146.718.53 Construction J-35-1 50583 Margate Construction,Inc. 2.720.990.00 Construction P1-37 50684 Oved Dagan Construction Co. 95,358.72 Construction J-90 50685 Steve P Rados,Inc 827.714.70 Construction 1.24 60686 Union Bank of Cai6pmia 91,968.30 Construction 1-2-4,Retention 50687 Orange County Sanitation District 25,356.49 Workers Comp.Rome. 5(1688 Air Products&Chemicals 26.760.02 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 SOBS) AccuStandard,Inc. 176.85 Lab Supplies 50690 Adamson Industries 1,289.77 Lab Pans&Supplies 50691 Great American Printing Co. 172.40 Printing 50692 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 920.00 Professional Services-Engine Support 50693 Airborne Express 20.17 Ai Freight 50694 Airgas-West 790.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 50595 Airgas Safety 3.726.96 Safety Supplies 50696 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 4.460.86 Manhole Frames&Covers 50697 All American Asphalt 17,550.00 Manhole Grade AdjmI nenls-City of Cypress 50698 Applied Industrial Technology 625.38 Mechanical Supplies 50699 Aspen Publishers,Inc. 157.28 Publication 50700 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 50701 ACS Hydraulics,Inc. 715.64 Hydraulic Motor 50702 AKM Consulting Engineers 23,681.60 Professional Services 7-36,7.39,741-Trunk Sewer Improvements 50703 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 107.21 Telephone Service 50704 AVO International 3,790.00 O&M Meeting Registration 50705 AWSI 196.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 50706 Baker Tanks 8,898.89 Rental Equipment-Tanks&Fence Berms 50707 Retentive.Inc 3,480.00 Temporary Employment Services 50708 Basic Chemical Solutions 4.274.13 Sodium Bi ul6le 50709 Battery Specialties 2,439.74 Batteries 50710 Bio-Rad Lab 158.14 Lab Parts&Supplies 50711 Black&Veatch Corporation 16,647.85 Engineering Services P2-85 50712 Boyle Engineering Corporation 13,841.28 Engineering Services 6-13 50713 Brenntag West,Inc. 313.48 Janitorial Supplies 5U714 Bush&Associates,Inc 6,550.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25.97 50715 Business Objects Americas 13,563.99 Software Maintenance-Business Objects 50716 SC Wire Rope&Rigging 306.22 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Service 50717 C.S.U.F.Foundalion 10,031.25 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 50718 GTemp,Inc. 1.246.44 Engine Parts&Supplies 50719 Cal Protection 56.03 Service Agreement-Halon Fire System at OIL 2 Control Center Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50720 California Barricade Rentals 575.00 Barricade Rentals 50721 Callrol,Inc. 149.31 Electrical Pans&Supplies 50722 Cambridge Isotope Labs 1.400.86 Lab Parts&Supplies 50723 Cayman Chemical Company 742.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 60724 Ce112Ce11 235.62 Communication Equipment 50725 Certified Truck Bodies 7,773.04 (10)Powder-Coated,2-Drawer,Flip-Lid Truck Tool Bons 507213 Charles P.Crowley Co. 3,063.51 Electrical Parts&Supplies 50727 Charts,Inc. 276.87 Charts 50728 Con-Way Western Express 940.51 Freight Charges 50729 Consolidated Elect.Distrbutors,Inc. 4,049.16 Electrical Supplies 50730 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 3,531.29 Plumbing Supplies 50731 Corporate Express 4,326.89 Of ica Supplies 50732 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 1.229.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50733 County of Orange-Auction Controller 10,125.00 Underground Storage Tank,Hazardous Material,&State Fees 60734 County Wholesale Electric Co. 467.46 Electrical Paris&Supplies 50735 Culligan of Orange County 36.00 Maint.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener System 50735 CAPIO 175.00 Membership-California Association of Public Into.Officials 50737 CGvL Engineers 3,905.26 Professional Services Pl-94 50738 Cabo Specially Chemicals Corporation 14,885.87 Cellonic Polymer 50739 CPI Interna0onal 1.089.73 Lab Parts&Supplies 50740 County Sanitation District No.70 4.760.00 Olfaclomeby Lab Expense 50741 CWEA 286.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 50742 CWEA Membership 276.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 50743 Dapper Tire Co. 353.69 Truck Time 607" Devids Tree Service 400.00 Tree Maint.Service 50745 Del Mar Analytical 4,538.00 Btosolids Analysis 60746 Dela6eld Corp. 1.397.96 Hose Assembly 60747 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 1.832.63 (5)Dell AXIMs and(2)DVD Rom Drives 5D748 Dick Munns Co. 110.00 Calibrate Meter 50749 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 200.87 Paint Supplies 50750 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 869.93 Electrical Supplies 50751 Ecology Control Industries 1,088.00 Hazardous Waste Disposal 50752 Element K Journals 67.00 Publication 50753 Elliott Bay Design Group 364.28 Naval Architecture Marine Engineering Services 60754 Environmental&Occupational Risk Mgmt. 2.250.00 Professional Services-Inspection of Operations Center Basement Wall Cavities 50765 Environmental Science Associates 11.690.43 Professional Services J-87 50756 Pacific Stales Chemical,Inc. 1,676.31 Chemicals 50757 Excel Door&Gate Company,Inc. 1.659.00 Door Repair-Bldg.C Roll-Up Doors 50758 ENS Resources.Inc. 15,102.16 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 50759 FedEx Corporation 364.88 Air Freight 50760 First American Real Estate Solutions 174.60 Orange County Property Information 50761 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 15.908.81 Lab Parts It Supplies 50762 Flo-Systems,Inc. 36.33 Pump Supplies 50763 Fluid Dynamics 12,971.80 Polymer Dilution&Feed System&Meters 50764 Fwdcratt Coffee&Refreshment Services 326.06 Meeting Supplies 50765 Fountain Valley Camera 14.17 Photo Supplies 50766 Frys Electronics 833.65 Computer Supplies 50767 Full Spectrum Analylics 1,121.74 instrument Repairs Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT A G Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50768 GE Supply 106.79 Elecldc Parts 50769 Garland Manufacturing Co. 1,787.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50770 Garrall-Callahan Company 1,101.78 Chemicals 50771 Getinge Castle 70.80 Lab Supplies 50772 Glass Tech Supplies,Inc. 693.91 Lab Parts&Supplies 50773 WIN Grainger,Inc. 1,200.40 Electrical Parts&Supplies 50774 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 480.36 Janitorial Supplies 50775 Heaver Equipment Company 1,832.69 Truck Parts&Service 60776 Hach do Ponlon Industries 1,670.47 Lab Parts&Supplies 50777 American Sigma,Inc. 128.00 Instrument Repairs&Calibration 50778 Herrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 1,48727 Plumbing Supplies 60779 Asmm Hasler Mailing Systems 575.00 Software Maintenance-Mail Manager Intellitouch System 60750 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 4,366.35 Engine Generator Control Supplies 50781 Henry Company-Sealants Division 169.03 Sealant 50782 Hill,Inc. 5,727.65 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 50783 Home Depot 364.54 Misc.Repair 8 Maintenance Material 50784 Hopkins Technical Products 7,812.42 Pump&Pump Supplies 50785 Horizon Technology 617.95 Lab Parts&Supplies 50786 HI Standard Automotive 472.46 Automotive Parts&Supplies 50787 Imaging Express 109.93 Printer Maintenance 50788 Imperial Flange&Filling Co.,Inc. 787.18 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50789 Industrial Distribution Group 595.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50790 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 211.93 Lab Supplies 50791 Interstate Battery Systems 497.30 Batteries 50792 Intratek Computer,Inc. 4.487.73 Software-Chaco Secure 50793 Invensys Systems,Inc. 3,241.11 Instrument Supplies 5D794 Iron Mountain 150.00 Bid Document Storage Fees-J-39&P1-37 50795 IBM Corp. 15,750.00 Prof.Services-Network Upgrade&Design Consulting 50796 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 3,827.47 Instrument Parts.Supplies&Yearly Inspection&Cemficaeon of Tr4Pod Winch 50797 Jays Catering 602.42 Meeting Expenses 50798 Johnson Bearing 4,800.00 Cleaning Solvent 60799 Johnstone Supply 1,040.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60800 Kars Advance Materials,Inc. 7,682.50 Eng.Services-Can Gen Engine No.3 50801 KLBP Marketing 749.15 Safety Incenlive Items 508D2 L&N Uniform Supply Co. 1,833.89 Logo Printing/Embroidery Services 60803 Lab Support 001.75 Temporary Employment Services 50804 Labware,Inc, 1,50D.00 Lab Training Registration 50805 Lexis Nexiv Matthew Bender 311.37 Publication 50806 Luccl's 201.12 Meeting Expense 50807 LINJER 4,565.18 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 50808 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 12.332.60 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 60809 Management Technologies $69.69 Project Management Office Training Registration 60810 Manall,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 5,000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 60811 MarVac Electronics 19.24 Electrical Parts&Supplies 50812 Malt Chi",Inc. 951.00 Valves 50813 Mc Junkin Corp--Ontario Branch 2.819.47 Valves 60814 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,5D3.41 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 50815 Mee Analytical System 0.559.00 Lab Analysis-Core Ocean Monitoring Page 5 of 6 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50816 Medlin Controls Co. 1.415.63 Instrument Supplies 50817 Millbonics do RIMS Engineering 192.01 Electrical Supplies 50818 Mission Uniform Service 3,12923 Uniform Rentals 50819 MSA do Mag Systems 411.49 Instrument Supplies 50820 N.Glantz&Son 455.00 Reflective Sheeting 50821 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 12.323.34 Safety Training Registration-National Electric Code Training 50822 NetVersanl of Southern California 7,918.31 Access Control System Maintenance 50823 Hickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 179.17 Grease 60824 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 103.55 Steel Tags 50825 NRG Energy.Inc. 1.500.04 Eylosion Relief Valves 50826 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.472.25 Office,Supplies 50827 Olympus America,Inc. 8,000.76 Mechanical Repairs 50828 Omega Industrial Supply,Inc. 570.40 Janitorial Supplies 60829 OnaSource Distributors,Inc. 69.94 Electrical Parts It Supplies 50830 Orange County Hose Company 183.61 Hose Supplies 50831 Orange Fluid System Technologles,Inc. 738.91 Valves 50832 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.00 Maintenance,Testing&Certification of Fire Sprinkler Systems at Pits.1 &2 50833 Oxygen Service Company 3.252.22 Specialty Gases 60834 OCB Reprographics 1,9D1.98 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 50835 OI Analytical 520.89 Lab Parts&Supplies W836 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 932.74 Electrical Supplies 50837 Pace Analytic Services 1.550.00 High Resolution Analysis of Effluent&Biosolids 50838 Pacific Bell 34.81 Telephone Services 50839 Pacific BeIVWOMCOm 119.98 Telephone Services 5D840 Pacific Mechanical Supply 701.62 Plumbing Supplies 50841 Pacific Pans&Controls 726.80 Electrical Parts&Repairs 5DB42 Pacific West Printing&Premature 405.64 Rideshare Program Promotional Coffee Mugs w/Logo 50843 Panametrice 641.00 Calibrate Portable Flow Meter 608" Parker Motion&Controls Sales 61.11 Mechanical Parts&Supplies - 50845 Parker Supply Company 1.799.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60846 Partners Consulting Services 0.460.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 50847 Paris Unlimited 18.86 Truk Supplies 50848 Peace Officers Council Of CA 1,332.00 Dues Deduction 50849 PenValve 648.68 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 508W The Perkin Elmer Corp. 15,514.07 Lab Instrument SufiaereMamwere 5OB51 Power Electra Supply Co.,Ina 175.49 Electrical Supplies 50852 Power Systems Testing 500.00 Electrical Equipment Testing Services 50853 Powerflo Products,Inc. 588.00 Pump&Pump Supplies 508M Public Resources Advisory Group 2,187.50 Financial Advisory Services 50855 Pumping Solutions,Inc 3,77125 Pumps 50856 Pump Engineering&/or QAtr California 394.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50857 Oualily Building Supply 210.55 Hardscape Supplies 50858 R.L.Abbott&Associates 3.000.00 Kenn County Biosolids Cors ing Services 5DB59 Randolph Austin Co. 661.11 Tubing 50850 Red Wing Shoes 307.74 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 50861 Regents of Univ.of Calfomia 12.066.29 Professional Services J-85 50862 Retrofit Parts&Components,Ina 378.22 Valve 50863 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 7,477.85 Chopper Pump aL Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50864 RPM Electric Motors 6,535.18 Motors 50865 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 295.00 Paint Supplies 50866 Sthwing America,Inc 846.02 Pump Supplies 50867 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 46.53 Freight 50668 Shurelurk Sales&Engineering 590.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50869 SktilPath OnSile 5.10D.00 On-Site Training 50870 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 117.63 Plumbing Supplies 50871 Smith-Emery Company 4,639.50 Professional Services Pl-37&7-41 50872 Snap On Industrial 157.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50873 Snap-On Tools 300.14 Tools 50874 SWIM Computer Products 1.126.08 Mac.Office Supplies&Fixtures 50875 Southern California Air Cord.Dist 1.106.58 Electrical Supplies 50876 Southern California Edison 9,547.32 Power 50877 Sparkleta 1.462.28 Drinking Water/Gaoler Rentals 50878 Specialized Powder Coating 352.00 Powder Coating of Tool Bon Brackets 50879 Standard Industrial Corp. 104.09 Publication 508110 Sterling Fluid Systems(USA),Inc. 1,833.61 Pump 50881 Summit Steel 283.39 Metal W882 Sunset Industrial Para 597.18 Mechanical Supplies 50883 Systime Computer Corp. 5.800.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One World XE Implementation 50884 South Coast Environmental Co. 1,528.39 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 50M SOP Science 314.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 50886 Solar Turbines,Inc. 761.00 Sdar Turbine Controls Repair SM87 SPX Valves&Control 1,178.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50M Tamara Block 327.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 50889 Taylor-Dunn 290.65 Electric Cad Para 50890 Themes Electron Specuoso py 310.07 Lab Parts&Supplies 50B91 Osprey Marine Management 1,050.00 Lab Analyses 50892 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 4,938.38 Mechanical Para&Supplies 50893 DaM Pilot 60.00 Notices&Ads 50894 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 76.47 Locks&Keys 50895 The Trans Company 450.42 Electrical Paris&Supplies W896 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 320.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 50897 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,517.67 Automotive Supplies 50898 Teksystems 3,280.00 Temporary Employment Services 50899 US Filter Corporation 1,499.00 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 50900 Ultra Scientific 558.96 Lab Parts&Supplies 50901 United Parcel Service 3550 Parcel Services 50902 United Rentals,Inc. 120.12 Pallet Jack Rental 511903 Defense Finance and Accounting 8.253.47 Professional Services J-85-Naval Post Graduate School SD904 Univar USA 527.98 Chlorine 5D905 UC Regents 595.00 Human Resources Training Registration 50906 U-Line 597.94 Office Supplies 50907 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 10.908.00 Temporary Employment Service W908 Vapez,Inc. 9,589.48 Instrument Paris&Supplies 50909 Verizon California 6,368.47 Telephone Services 50910 Verde's Plumbing 75.00 Service Contract-Testing&Cad.Backflaw Devices at Pits.1&2&Pump Ste. 50911 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 4.419.07 Lab Parts&Supplies Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50912 The Wackenhut Corporation 15,275.95 Security Guards 50913 Waco Filler 1.007.61 Filtration System Supplies 50914 Wally Machinery and Tool Supply,Inc. 1,60321 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50915 Weber Scientific 1,358.79 Lab Supplies 50910 WEF 288.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 50917 Xerox Corporation 14,207.33 Fax&Copier Leases 50918 YSI Massachusetts 1,870.58 Temperature Probe&Cable 50919 California Bank&Trust 1,713.00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention 50920 Southern Contracting Company 15,423.00 Construction J-33-1A 50921 Robert M.Bell 358.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 50922 Pongsakdi Cady 388.00 MeethipTraining Expense Reimbursement 60923 Mike J.Hemera 125.00 MeetingRnlning Expense Reimbursement 60924 Linde Losurdo 219.73 MeelingRreining Expense Reimbursement 50925 David A Ludwin 405.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 50926 Patrick B.Miles 368.00 Meetingrtralning Expense Reimbursement 50927 Matthew P.Smith 164.00 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement 50928 John W.Swindler 368.D0 Meeling/Trelning;Expense Reimbursement 5D929 Aquarium of the Pacific 72.75 Reimbursable Employee Activity Expense 50930 County of Orange 86.00 Annexation Fee 50931 Orange County Sanitation District 749.83 Petty Cash Reimb. 50932 Robertson,Dana R. 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 50933 Robert J.Thiede 368.00 Meetirq/Training Expense Reimbursement 50934 Orange County Water District 571,902.69 GAP Water Use&Joint GWRS Project J-36 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants E 8,657,444.71 Payroll Disbursements 29041 -29160 Employee Paychecks E 152,766.05 Biweekly Payroll 02/05/03 29161-29162 Interim Paychecks 2,647.51 Adjustments 81656-82141 Direct Deposit Statements 822,626.41 Biweekly Payroll 02/05/03 Total Payroll Disbursements E 978,039.97 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas,National Association 31,915.74 January Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Tens.National Association 130.874.37 Societe Generale January Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Manhattan Bank,New York 75,575.23 Commitment Fee on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation 11/01/02 to 01/31/03 Societe Generale,New York 55,055.52 Standby Letter of Credit on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Lloyds TSB Bank Pic 76,708.40 Standby Letter of Credit 1990.1992 Refunded COPs Total Wire Transfer Payments E 370.129.26 Total Claims Paid 02101103.02/15/03 E 10,205,613.94 c Pepe 8 018 EXHIBIT A C 1 P Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 50935 Orange County Sanitation District 6 551,351.11 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 50936 Systlme Computer Corp 66,500.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One Word XE Implementation 50937 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 58.06 Cellular Telephone Service 50938 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 50939 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 50940 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 44.09 Plumbing Supplies 50941 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 50942 CWEA Specialty Conference 181.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 5D943 Electra-Bond,Inc. 23.424.85 Recealing&Machine Work on Belt,Loading&Driver Rollers 50944 Employee Senerds Specialists,Inc. 7,705.39 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical It Dependent Care 5DD45 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 50946 Franchise Tax Board 488.89 Wage Garnishment 50947 Indu rol2l Threaded Products,Inc. 164.05 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 50M Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 50949 Intl.Union of Oper.End.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,251.52 Dues Deduction 50950 Irvine Ranch Water District 58.87 Water Use 50951 Maldtev,Bender&Co.,Inc. 51.84 Publication 50952 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 805.38 Meters 50953 National Bond&Trust 1.795.94 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 50954 OCEA 524.61 Dues Deduction 50955 Pacific Bell 27.15 Telephone Services 50956 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 50957 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 50958 Peace Offosrs Council of CA 1.404.00 Dues Deduction 50959 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 14.18 Plumbing Supplies 50960 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 50961 Southern California Edison 5,629.71 Power 50962 Summit Steel 376.62 Metal 50963 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 6,504.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50M U.S Postal Servke(AMS.TMS) 5,000.00 Postage 50965 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 50966 Verizon California 465.16 Telephone Services 50967 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment 50968 Evangelista,Jerry 1,890.99 Employee Computer Loan Program 50969 Deirdre E.Hunter 104.74 Meeling7Traming Expense Reimbursement 50970 Jeffrey T.Reed 1,214.42 Meelingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 60971 Lisa L.Tomko 1,001.26 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 50972 Edward M.Torres 751.11 MeeOng/rialning Expense Reimbursement 50973 Ernest N.Veboah 183.90 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 50974 JPC Construction 9,804.70 Construction-Enclose Pit.2 D nvalermg Facility valh Screening 50975 Air Products&Chemicals 25,758.02 O It M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 W976 Blue Crass of California 277,266.59 Medical Insurance Premium 50977 Coral Energy Resources,L.P. 79,164.63 Natural Gas 50978 Clbs Specialty Chemicals Corporation 43.627.55 Cationic Polymer 50979 Delta Dental 50517.56 Dental Insurance Plan 50980 Dynamic Fabrication,Inc. 33,187.00 (1)Set of Augers 50981. Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc 72.752.20 Construction-High-Pressure Digester Gas Pipeline Repairs&11-23-1 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 02/16103 to 02128/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description - 50982 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 133.049.09 Femtc Chloride MO 9.27-95 50983 Orange County Water District 493.963.90 GAP Water Use&GWRS Joint Project J-36 50984 Pacific Investment Management Co. 138.506.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 60985 Painevrebber Incorporated 31.409.06 COP Remarketing Agreement SM86 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 188,859-14 Sodium Hypochlonte 50987 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 191.633.85 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 50988 Southern California Edison 60.61522 Power 50989 The Lewis Group 26.650.00 Consulting Service-Capital Project Management Process 50990 Trusecere Corporation 33.90.00 Site Secure Service 50991 Tule RanchfMagan Farms 159,170.66 Residuals Removal MO3-29.95 50992 Steve P Rados,Inc. 708.612.40 Construction 1.2-4 50993 Union Bank of California 78,723.60 Construction 1.2-4,Retention 50994 Precision Industrial Tooling Co.,Inc. 93,656.30 Mechanical Equipment-Variable Speed Lathes,Table Saws,Drill Press 50995 Adamson Industries 773.86 Lab Supplies 50996 Agllent Technologies,Inc. 769.33 Lab Parts If Supplies 5D997 Atgas-West 9.40 Demurrage 5D998 Airgas Safety 977.10 Safety Supplies 60999 Allied Electronics,Inc. 239.58 Electrical Supplies 51000 Asa-Robbins,Inc. 103.00 Instrument Supplies 51001 American Society of Safety Engineers 140.00 Membership 51002 Aquarium Doctor 239A5 Human Resources Aquarium Service 51003 Arch Wireless 1,125.50 Pagers.Service&Airtime 51004 Argos Technologies,Inc, 153.54 tab Pants&Supplies 51005 Associated Readymix Concrete 262.91 Concrete 51006 Association of Energy Engineers 146.00 O&M Meeting Registration 51007 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Amum 51008 Awards&Trophies Company 44.07 Plaques 51009 ACS Hydraulics.Inc 1.99727 Pump 51010 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 268.28 Telephone Service 51011 AT&T Wireless Services 118.48 Wireless Phone Services 51012 Battery Specialties WAS Batteries 51013 BioMeneuz Vitek, Inc. 1.027.75 Lab Supplies 51014 Brinderson Corporation 7.192.00 Professional Services Pi-95 51015 Burke Engineering Co. 423.90 Motor 51016 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 32.33 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Service 51017 C-Temp.Inc. 399.79 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 51018 California Automatic Gate 1,270.00 Automatic Gate Repairs at Pit.2 51019 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 120.00 Membership 51020 Catapult Systems Couporalbn 1,316.92 Software/Hardware 51021 Certified Truck Bodies 484.88 Electrical Parts&Supplies 51022 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. - 87.61 Office Supplies 51023 Cole-Parmer instrument Co. 213.72 Lab Parts&Supplies 51024 Communications Supply Corp. 14,736.79 Electrical Pans&Supplies 51025 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 1,675.68 Electrical Supplies 51026 Consumers Pipe If Supply Co. 2.862.60 Plumbing Supplies 51027 Control Factors-Seattle,Inc 994.80 Filter Elements 61020 Control Technologies 9.492.78 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Equipment 51029 Cooper Energy Services 3.637.87 Engine Supplies Page 2 of EXHIBIT e C 1 P Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51030 Cooper Energy Services 2,380.00 O&M Training Registration 51031 Corporate Express Imaging 5.301.33 Computer Supplies 51032 Corporate Express 8,267.21 Office Supplies 51033 Cost Containment Solutions 3,770.56 Workers Comp.Services 51034 County Wholesale Electric Co. 905.41 Electrical Parts&Supplies 51035 CMAA 225.00 Engineering&Construction Management Training Registration 51036 CR&R,Inc. 3,207.89 Container Rentals 51037 CWEA 823.45 Source Coned Meeting Registration&Publication 51038 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 2,005.00 O&M Meeting Registration-California Water Environment Association 51039 CWEA Membership 92.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 61040 Del Mar Analytical 204.00 Siosolids Analysis 51041 Detection Instruments Corporation 308.88 Ins.Parts&Supplies 51D42 Dionex Corporation 2,810.60 Lab Parts&Supplies 51043 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 2,950.00 Painting Maint Services MO 4.22-98 51D44 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 135.77 Electrical Supplies 51045 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 265.00 Medical Screening 51046 Electro-Test,Inc. 7,603.44 Electrical Supplies 51047 Elliott Bay Design Group 152.53 Professional Services-Evaluation of Responses to RFP 51D48 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 637.30 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 51D49 Enchanter,Inc. 9,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 51050 Environmental&Occupational Risk Mgml 900.00 Professional Services-Inspection of O&M Control Ch.Basement Wall Cavities 51051 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 20,000.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 51062 Environmental Resource Assoclation/ERA 4,625.14 Lab Parts&Supplies 51053 EnviroWn Software,Inc. 407.00 Software 51054 ESRI,Inc. 3.200.00 Engineering Training Registration 51055 FedEs Corporation 243.29 Air Freight 51056 Fllarsky&Waft,L.L.P. 1,045.00 Prof.Services-Labor Negotiations Services with OCSD's Bargaining Groups 51057 Filter Supply Company 3,016.70 Fitters 51058 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,422.54 Lab Parts&Supplies 51059 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 60.00 Meeting Supplies 51060 Franklin Covey 423.86 Office Supplies 51061 FST Sand and Gravel,Inc. 342.11 Road Base Materials 51062 Garland Manufacturing Go. 1.714.38 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51063 Garratt-Callahan Company 7,078.69 Chemicals 51064 George Yardley Co. 646.34 Solenoid Valves 51065 Gerhardfs,Inc. 7,909.93 Copper Spark Plugs 51066 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 87.92 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 51067 Golderimst Fence Company 465.00 Main Street Pump Station-Fence Repairs 51068 W W Grainger,Inc 3,526.69 Safely Signs&Mechanical Pans&Supplies 51069 Graybar 5,766.13 Hardware/Software&Electrical Supplies 51070 Haaker Equipment Company' 1,695.62 Automotive Parts&Repairs 51071 Hach do Ponton Industries 2,130.32 Instrument Parts&Supplies 51072 American Sigma,Inc. 1,666.83 Lab Parts&Supplies 51073 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 51074 Harrington IndusMal Plastics,Inc. 39.32 Plumbing Supplies 51075 Hasco Oil Co.,Inc. 218.24 Grease 51076 Hello Direct,Inc. 995.46 Telephone Headsets&Supplies 51077. Hillf,Inc 6.939.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51076 The Holman Group 1,704.24 Employee Assistance Program Premium 61079 Home Depot 210.91 Mist Repair&Maintenance Material 51080 Hopkins Technical Products 3,221.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51081 Horizon Technology 836.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 51082 Hub Auto Supply 309.14 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 51083 City of Huntington Beach 15,530.18 Water Use 51084 HCS Cutler 1,5W.77 Mechanical Supplies,Tools&Ladders 51085 Imaging Express 228.04 Toner Cartridges 51086 Industrial Distribution Group 2.102.12 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 51087 Industrial Filler Manufacturers.Inc. 2.479.04 Filters 51088 IBM 405.00 Software Support IBM AS400 51D89 Interstate Battery Systems 778.18 Batteries 51090 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1,830.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies 61091 Irvine Technology Corporation 13,360.00 Temporary Employment Services 51092 Jays Catering 1,D30.45 Meeting Expenses 51093 Johnstone Supply 381.74 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 61094 JPR Systems,Inc. 2,091.38 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51095 J2 Printing Services 156.24 Printing 51096 Kaman Industrial Technologies 2,652.44 Electrical Parts&Supplies 51097 Keith Boger 1,335.00 O&M Training Registration 51098 Kett US 6,465.00 Equipment Rental 51099 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 867.07 Instrument Parts&Supplies 51100 Lexis-Nexls 48.66 Books&Publications 51101 Lord&Sons.Inc. 517.20 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 51102 Lucct's 494.04 Meeting Expense 51103 Lytle Screen Printing 511.81 Printing-OCSD New Board Orientation Tote Bags 51104 Manleys Boller,Inc. 830.00 Boiler Emissions Testing 51105 MarVac Electronics 26.83 Electrical Parts&Supplies 51105 Mail Chlor,Inc. 5,058.98 Valves 51107 MCBam Instruments 570.00 Lab Maintenance-(12)Microscopes 511DB McKenna Engineering&Equipment Co.,Inc. 168.25 Fillers 51109 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 2.613.12 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 51110 Mec Analytical System 1,465.00 Toxicity Analysis 51111 Media Resurfacing Systems,Inc. 2,000.00 Bell Press Maintenance 51112 Medlin Controls Co. 91.99 Instrument Supplies 51113 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 1,562.50 Professional Service-Tule Ranch It Yakima Siles Study 61114 Mission Uniform Service 5,183.92 Uniform Rentals 51115 Mykrolis Corporation 1,195.00 Calibration Service-(2)Mass Flow Controllers 51116 Nahabit It Associates,Inc. 885.00 Purchasing Training Registration 51117 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 11,125.34 Human Resources Safety Training-Electrical Code 51118 NetVersant of Southern California 595.00 Human Resources Security System Improvements 51119 City of Newport Beach 11.87 Water Use 51120 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,596.31 Turbine It Machine Oil 51121 The Norco Companies 165.00 Mai Delivery Service 51122 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 46.00 Steel Tags 61123 NAB Associates,Inc. 1,673.60 Toxicity Analysis 51124 NCG Porter Novelli,Inc. 9,844.64 Professional Services-Public Relations 51125. Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,229.03 Office Supplies .r Page 4 of 7 EXHIBITS C. P Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51126 OneSource DisWbutors,Inc. 902.77 Electrical Parts&Supplies 61127 Orange County Business Council 650.00 Communications Meeting Registration 51128 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 57.15 Plumbing Supplies 51129 Oxford University Press 74.79 Publication 51130 Oxygen Service Company 2.231.89 Specialty Gases 51131 OCB Reprographiu 4,238.44 Pdnlin9 Service-MO 112MO 61132 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc 114.34 Electrical Supplies 61133 Pace Analytic Services 975.00 High Resolution Analysis of Effluent&Biosolids 51134 Pacific Bell 1,181.59 Telephone Services 51136 Pacific Bell Internet Services 328.86 Internet Service 51136 Pacific Mechanical Supply 664.15 Plumbing Supplies 51137 Parsons Infrastructure&Tech.Group 19.900.29 Professional Services-Asset Management Program 51138 Partners Consulting Services 14,280.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 51139 Parts Unlimited 49.23 Automotive Parts&Supplies 51140 Perms Pure,Inc. 219.10 Filler 61141 Postmaster General 150.00 Postal Permit Renewal Fee 51142 Power Eleclro Supply Co.,Inc. 80.93 Electrical Supplies 51143 Professional Publications,Inc. 246.97 Publication 51144 Progressive Business Publications 230.00 Publication 57145 Projects Partners 12,227.65 Temporary Employment Services 51146 PC Mall Gov.Inc. 323.25 Labeler 51147 PC$Express 110.00 Courier Service 51148 PDSA,Inc. 1,500.00 Software 51149 PR Week 126.00 Publication 61160 PSI 6,238.73 Hot It Colo Pressure Washer 51151 Pump Engineering Wor OAir California 175.17 Pump Supplies 51152 R.W.Beck 4,09928 Professional Services Pi-90 51163 R.L.Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kam County Biosolids Consulting Services 51154 Raney Industries 825.00 Conked Service-Belt Press Equipment Modification 51155 Rayne Water Systems O08-D 12/31/02 1,395.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 51166 Reliastsr 9,316.95 Employee Medical Health Premium 51167 Retrofit Paris&Components,Inc. 1,278.51 Mechanics]Parts It Supplies 51158 Rutan&Tucker,L.L.P. 5,332.03 Legal Services-Crow-W Inlhrop Development 51159 RPM Electric Motors 1,974.78 Motors,Parts&Repair Service 51160 Sartorius Corporation 131.17 Lab Parts It Supplies 61161 Schwin9 America,Inc. 1,595.69 Motor 51162 Seavenlures 5,250.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 51163 Sehl Computer Products,Inc. 6,058.34 Laser Printer/Copier 51164 Salon Name Plate Corp 112.23 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51165 Shepard Brothers,Inc. 927.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 51166 Shu cluck Sales&Engineering 810.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51167 Supeloo,Inc. 793.76 Lab Paris&Supplies 51168 Skater,Inc. 172.58 Lab Parts&Supplies 51169 Skylights Unlimited 1,025.00 Skylights Replacement&Removal 51170 Southern California Edison 28,81 Power 51171 Southern Counties ON Go. 6.611.11 Diesel Fuel 51172 Spex Cemprep,Inc. 383.61 Lab Para&Supplies 51173 Sterling Art 221.88 Stationery&Office Supplies Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51174 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 276.76 Stationery&Oflice Supplies 51175 Strata International,Inc, 505.46 Chemicals 51176 Summit Steel 1.362.30 Metal 61177 Sunset Ford 1,548.38 Vehicle Repairs-V-478 51178 Sunset Industrial Parts 3.989.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51179 Super Chem Corporation 672.42 Cleaner/Degreaser 51180 Symcas-TSG 1,384.18 SCADA System,VAX Maintenance 61181 SPX Valves&Control 2.895.03 Valves 51182 The Orange County Register 4.580.36 Notices&Ads 61183 The Tin Bander 309.24 Fiberglass Dud Liner 51184 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc 272.67 Mechanical Supplies 51185 Daily Pilot 250.00 Notices&Ads 51186 Tonys Lock&Safe Service&Sales 27.21 Locks&Keys 51187 Total Safety,Inc. 313.40 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repair 51188 Transcal 790.51 Mechanical&Electrical Supplies 51189 Trench Shoring Company 737.01 Trench Jacks 51190 Tri-State Pump 330.00 Pump Supplies 51191 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 9.219.09 Contact Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 51192 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 659.05 Automotive Supplies 51193 TCH Associates,Inc. 1.919.22 Lab Supplies 51194 U.S.Metro Group,Inc. 24,786.00 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 51195 Ultra Scientific 075.48 Lab Parts&Supplies 51196 United Parcel Service 1,37726 Parcel Services 51197 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 233.68 Hoses 51198 US Filter/Stranm 1,232.29 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 51199 Vallen Safety Supply Company 129.30 Safely Supplies 51200 Vapex,Inc 636.00 Pumps 51201 Verizon California 590.74 Telephone Services 51202 Verve's Plumbing 460.00 Backflow Device Replacement 51203 Vertex.Inc. 1.845.76 Software 61204 Vision Service Plan-(GA) 8.807.04 Vision Service Premium 51205 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 2.676.89 Lab Parts&Supplies 612DO The Wackenhut Corporation 19.820.16 Seedy Guards 51207 Waters Corporation 1.930.95 Lab Parts&Supplies 51208 Waxie Sanitary Supply 195.55 Janitorial Supplies 51209 Westport Aparelus DBA Breaker Supply 402.42 Electrical Paris&Supplies 51210 Witeg Scientific 161.63 Lab Parts&Supplies 51211 WEF 134.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 51212 WS Atkins Water 6.000.00 Professional Services-Digester Evaluation Flow Studies $1213 Xerox Corporation 7,038.09 Fax/Copier Leases&Supplies 51214 XESystsme.Inc. 302.50 Xerox Synergix Maintenance Service 51215 Yokogawa Corp.of America 386.41 Instrument Supplies 51216 Richard A.Caslillon 201.12 Meelingfl-mining Expense Reimbursement 51217 Robert P.Ghlrelt 358.34 Meelingirrmining Expense Reimbursement 51218 Victoria L.Henn 200.00 MeetingrTraming Expense Reimbursement 51219 Vladimir A.Kogan 443.06 Meetinglfraining Expense Reimbursement 51220 Charles D.McGee 150.OD Membership 51221. Merrill F.Seller 133.00 Membership m e, Page 6 of EXHIBIT B m P Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51222 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 750.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 51223 Orange County Sanitation District 865.20 Petty Cash Reknb. 51224 Unocal Corporation-OOB'D 1003 5,797.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 51225 Willamette Industries,Inc. 6.225.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 51226 County of Orange-Auditor Conlrcller 210.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 51227 County of Orange-Auditor Conlroller tS.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,161,591.88 Panoll Disbursements 29163-29263 Employee Paychecks $ 156,684.67 Bkyeskly Payroll 02/19/03 82142-82624 Direct Deposit Statements 873,739.32 BMeekty,Payroll 02119103 Total Payroll Disbursements If 1,030,423.99 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank 8 Trust 134,005.76 February Interest Payment on Series 2000 A 8 B Certificates of PanMApatbn Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 134.005.76 Total Claims Paid 02116103-OV28103 $ 5.326.021.63 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT B a Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING WITH THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING APRIL 2, 2003 �oJ�t S NITgT�oy V N = 9 c Q n O --1 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Special Meeting with OMTS Committee Page 2 04/02/03 A special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, in conjunction with the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, was held on April 2, 2003, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. The following Directors were in attendance: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken,Chair Bob Hernandez X Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Leland Wilson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz X Alberta Christy Mike Garcia X John Collins Larry Crandall X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Brian Donahue David Shawver X Michael Duvall Ked Lynn Wilson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X Alice B. Jempsa Marilynn M. Poe X Tony Kawashima Doug Davert X Beth Krom Christina Shea X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Patsy Marshall Jim Dow X Robert McGowan Richard A. Freschi X Roy Moore John Beauman A Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Don Webb A Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Paul Walker Larry Herman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Carol Beekman; Bob Ghirelll; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Nick Amontes; Doug Stewart,Addana Renescu; Mike Moore; George Robertson; Mark Esquer; Bob Bell; Simon Watson OTHERS PRESENT: Bill Kennedy; Roger Bums; Lynn Norton; Gerhardt Van Drie; Randy Fuhrman; Jan Vandersloot Minutes for Special Meeting with OMTS Committee '! Page 3 04/02/03 tl REPORT OF OMTS COMMITTEE CHAIR Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Chair Jim Ferryman welcomed the Directors to attend the meeting to hear the discussion on the Asset Management Improvement Program. The Directors were reminded that only OMITS Directors would be voting on items that evening and those items would then be considered at the April 23,2003 meeting. OMTS03-18 Advanced Asset Management Program OCSD staff members Doug Stewart, Bob Ooten, and Dave Ludwin, along with Parsons/GHD consultants Lynn Norton and Roger Byrne, gave a presentation on the proposed advanced asset management program. Directors asked several questions regarding the presentation: why can't staff do this without a consultant; why do this now;why does it take ten years to educate staff; how was the consultant selected; has Parsons done this before;why not solicit competitive bids; what does the District get from this contract; and why so many hours? Directors were assured they would receive reports on a regular basis on the progress of the program. The OMTS Committee requested a presentation be provided at the April 23, 2003 meeting of the Board of Directors and to provide several real examples of cost savings from other agencies. ADJOURNMENT: The OMTS Committee Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. (A Secretary of Q Board of irectors of Orange County SanitatiW District GAwp.dta\agendaXBwrd Minu \2003 Bwd Mlnutes\040203 minutes.doc BOARD OF DIRECTORS �ng Date To D r. 4/23/03 AGENDA REPORT Imn Number Iem Numbe e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any camoaian contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Directors Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. SUMMARY See attached listing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 03/01/03—03/15/03 and 03/16/03—03/31/03 Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 51228 Orange County Sanitation District $ 547,762.92 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 51229 Southem California Edison 63,060.02 Power 51230 U.S. Peroxide 297,881.86 Hydrogen Peroxide 51231 Woodruff.Spradlin&Smart 132,864.76 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 512M American Industrial Hygiene Association 170.00 Membership 51233 Axeda Systems, Inc. 6,364.58 Software,Maintenance&Support- @&Glance Prof. Edition 51234 AT&T Universal Biller 2,855.00 Telephone Service 51235 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 68.02 Telephone Service 51236 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,563.19 Cellular Telephone Service 51237 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 51238 BNI Building News 640.45 Publication 51239 City of Costa Mesa 6,000.00 Construction-Sidewalk Repairs ® College Ave. Pump Station 51240 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 51241 Compressor Components Of California 1,260.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51242 Consolidated Elect. Distributors. Inc. 86.60 Electrical Supplies 51243 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 675.57 Plumbing Supplies 51244 Corporate Express 3,893.59 Office Supplies 51245 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 51246 CWEA Specialty Conference 181.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 51247 Document Control Solutions, Inc. 2,108.00 Software Support 51248 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 8.137.74 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 51249 Employers Group Service Corp. 4,320.00 Supervisor&Management On-Site Training 51250 Court Order 525.00 Wage Gamishment 51251 Franchise Tax Board 239.68 Wage Garnishment 51252 Health Science Associates 900.00 Professional Services-Asbestos Study 51253 Deirdre E. Hunter 107.74 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 51254 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 51255 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,271.29 Dues Deduction 51256 IPMP Institute for Participatory Mgmt. 525.00 Communications Training Registration 51257 John's Philly Grille 113.30 Meeting Expense-CIP Strategic Planning 51258 League Of California Cities 395.14 General Management Meeting Registration 51259 Luccrs 130.50 Meeting Expense 51260 Mallon Trust 19.935.06 Investment Custodian Bank 51261 Mealer-Toledo 445.00 Software Support 51262 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 690.00 Pump Repairs, Parts&Refurbishment 51263 Moody's Investors Service 5.000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 51264 Municipal Equipment Maintance Assn. 50.00 Membership 51265 National Bond&Trust 1,795.94 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 51266 City of Newport Beach 190.55 Water Use 51267 Nextel Communications 3,368.63 Cellular Phones&Air Time 51268 Nexaeq 825.00 Pumps 51269 Orange Fluid System Technologies. Inc. 300.56 Plumbing Supplies 51270 OCEA 524.61 Dues Deduction 51271 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 51272 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 51273 Pence Officers Council of CA 1,440.00 Dues Deduction 51274 Project Management Institute 154.00 Membership Page 1 of 8 EXHIBITA s � Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51275 Rellasrar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,484.60 Employee Life Ins. Premium,Short-Term Dlsabllky&Cancer Ins. Payroll Deductions 51276 James W. Silva 110.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51277 SkillPath On-Site 5.100.00 OnSke Training 51278 SkillPath Seminars 299.00 Information Technology Training Registration 51279 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 51280 Southern California Water 63.67 Water Use 51281 State Board of Equalization 322.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 51282 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 51991.03 COP Trustee Services 51283 Summit Steel 98.46 Metal 51284 The Training Clinic 3,825.55 On-Sae Training 51285 The Unlsource Corporation 7.785.88 Stationery&Office Supplies 51286 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 61287 Verizon California 818.75 Telephone Services 61288 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment 61289 Xerox Corporation 161.63 Fox Leases 51290 Co11nty,of Orange-Auditor Controller 76.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 51201 Philip F.Cordova 250.00 Meetingrrralning Expense Reimbursement $1292 Steven M.Thornburg 250.00 Meetingrtralning Expense Reimbursement 51293 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 705.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 51294 Medellin,Dave 1,449.76 Employee Computer Loan Program 51295 Ortega. Robert&Micro Center 871.81 Employee Computer Loan Program 51296 Santa Ana Plating 42.98 Reconciliation User Fee Program 51297 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 81.161.66 Professional Services J-73-2 51298 Brown and Caldwell 251,791.90 Engineering Services P1-37,2.41,O&M Manual and SOP Development 51299 Carollc Engineers 852.053.49 Professional Services J-25-4, P2-88&SP-90 51300 CH2M HIII 86.478.20 Professional Services J-40-7 61301 Godwin Pumps of America,Inc. 54,512.8E (2)4-Inch Portable SON-Priming Pumps 51302 Hill Brothers 48,420.41 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkllne 51303 IPMC c/o Parsons 488,002.00 Professional Services- Program/Project Management 51304 Kalser Foundation Health Plan 42,222.08 Medical Insurance Premium 51305 Kembon Pacific, Inc. 229,781.60 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 61306 Kloroe Professional Staffing 37,266.52 Temporary Employment Services 51307 Lee& Ro, Inc. 77.772.73 Professional Services P247-3,549. 5-50,5-51 &5-52 51308 Malcolm Finns, Inc. 119,229.59 Professional Services 1-10 51309 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 246.438.12 Engineering Services J-42 61310 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 81,095.07 Sodium Hypochlorite 51311 Plxelpushers, Inc. 135,985.50 Internet Site Redesign,On-Line Technical Spec.&Scope of Work Library 61312 Science Applications Intl.Corp. 32,397.99 Ocean Monitoring,Meter Mooring,Science Applications for Water Quality S1313 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 301,866.91 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 51314 Teksystems 27,639.00 Temporary Employment Services S1316 U.S.Peroxide 37,895.63 Hydrogen Peroxide 51316 Waste Markets Corp. 26,319.75 Malnt.Agreement-Orin&Screenings Removal& Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal 51317 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 42,225.50 Engineering Service J-67 51318 Green Giant Landscape, Inc. 51,873.00 Construction-Landscaping&Irrigation at Pa.2 51319 J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. 292,336.03 Conslmction J-35.1 51320 Ken Thompson, Inc. 34,600.00 Construction 6.46 51321 Margate Construction, Inc. 1,950,084.00 Construction P737 $1322 Oved Dagan Construction Co. 255,194.86 Construction J-90 Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51323 Southern Contracting Company 126,102.00 Construction J-33-1 61324 Orange County Sanitation District 34,051.10 Worker's Comp. Raimb. 51325 A-Plus Systems 1,570.00 Notices & Ads 61328 ABEL Pumps Corp. 878.22 Pump Supplies 61327 Acre Machinery, Inc. 477.00 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51328 Great American Printing Co. 212.72 Printing 51329 Air Liquids America Corp. 1,078.49 Specialty Oases 51330 Airborne Express 42.01 Air Freight 51331 Alrgae -W eat 306.29 Lab Supplies 51332 Alrgas Safety 0,554.01 Safety Supplies 51333 Allied Packing& Rubber, Inc. 769.86 Mechanical Supplies 51334 American Red Cross 648.00 CPR Classes& Misc. Supplies 61335 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 124.00 Lab Parts& Supplies 51336 Appleone Employment Service 8,654.05 Temporary Employment Services 51337 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labe, Inc. 1,070.00 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing 51338 Arch W Ireless 2,057.45 Pagers, Service & Airtime 51339 AeaurX, Inc. 4,445.00 CATW EB Server& Software and Technical Support $1340 Awards& Trophies Company 41.38 Plaques 51341 ASS Automation, Inc. 1.005.24 Instrument Repairs 51342 AKM Consulting Engineers 2,790.24 Professional 3ervlees 7-36 51343 ABBE American Soo.of Safety Engineers 2,139.00 Meeting Registration& Membership 51344 AT&T Wireless Services 2,935.12 W Ire lose Phone Services 51345 AWSI 206.00 D spa rim ant of Transportation Training P rog ram 61346 Baker Tanks 6.782.89 Tank Rentals 61347 Ballantyne. Inc. 20,368.00 Temporary Employment Services 51348 Basic Chemical Solutions 8,632.95 Sodium Moulins 51349 Battery Specialties 490.59 Batteries 51360 BloMerlaux Vitek, Inc. 1,093.20 Lab Parts & Supplies 51351 Borthwick,Guy, Bettenhausen 1,016.10 Professional Services P2-84 51352 Boyle Engineering Corporation 10,028.22 Engineering Services 1-2-4 51353 Bush & Associates, Inc. 1.380.00 Surveying Services MO 0.26-97 51354 C-Temp, Inc. 399.51 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51355 Southern California Marine Institute 3.050.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 61366 Callan Associates, Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 51357 Martin Boyer Co., Inc.c/o Cambridge Int. 2,083.33 Prof.Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 51358 Cardlock Fuels 749.51 Fuel Services 51369 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 2,084.42 Professional Services - SP-74 51360 Center for Creative Growth 2,000.00 Professional Services -O & M Management Coaching 51361 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 14,760.00 Professional Services -Safety& Emerg. Reap, Plan Revisions & Electrical Safety 51302 Communications Supply Corp. 2,229.10 Electrical Parts& Supplies 51303 Compressor Components Of California 6,301,30 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51304 Computational Systems, Inc. 3,726.70 Instrument Paris& Supplies 51305 Con-Way Western Express 338.80 Freight 51366 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 4,839.05 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51367 Consumers Pipe& Supply Co. 058.49 Plumbing Supplies 51308 Cooper Energy Services 154.68 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51369 Corporate Express 232.64 Office Supplies $1370 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 1,094.07 Maint.Agreement-Repair/Install Base, Handheld & Vehicle Radios Page 3 of EXHIBITA •. Claims Paid From 03101/03 to 03/15/03 , Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51371 County of Orange.Auditor Controller T 0.50 UST Surcharge, LIST PR, Haz. Mat-O.C. Fire Auth.&Stale Surcharge Base Chg. 51372 County Wholesale Electric Co. 21.97 Electrical Parts&Supplies 51373 CASA 325.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 51374 CH2MHill 8.710.54 Engineering Services J-87 51375 Clba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 18,153.72 Cationic Polymer 51376 CMAA 144.00 Publication(Oonst.Mgmt.Assoc. of America) 51377 CW EA 204.00 O&M Training Registration-California Water Environment Association 51378 CW EA 20M Annual Conference 4,335.00 O&M Training Registration-California Water Environment Association 51379 CWEA Membership 460.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 51380 Daniel Company, L.L.C. 2,503.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51381 Dapper Tire Co. 1,660.21 Truck Tires 51382 Dal Mar Analytical 2,064.00 Analysis of Wastewater&Biosolids 51383 Dell Direct Sales, LP. 1,817.74 (1)Dell Latitude Notebook 51384 Delta Packaging Products, Inc. 136.54 Lab Parts&Supplies 51385 DigiTerra 9,426.13 Client Access Software License-IBM A6400 51386 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 518.52 Paint Supplies 51387 DLT Solutions, Inc. 4,787.55 Software-Map Subscription&Series 51WS E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 15.84 Electrical Supplies 51389 Edwin M. Perkins 9,026.06 Professional Services-Water Quality Compliance 61390 Enchanter, Inc. 3'WO.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 51391 Environmental&Occupational Risk Mgmt 2,903.25 Professional Services-Comprehensive Noise Survey at Pits. 1 &2 51392 Environments]Resource Association 1,586.15 Lab Pans&Supplies 51393 Excel Door&Gate Company, Inc. 1,573.00 Maintenance&Repair Services 51394 Emedco 481.05 Identification Signs 51395 ENRG 5,492.30 Maintenance-Pit. 1 Compressed Natural Gas Station 51396 ENS Resources. Inc. 15,059.69 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 51397 FeclEx Corporation 97.23 Air Freight 51398 Fllterline Corporation 162.07 Filters 51399 First American Real Estate Solutions 221.00 Orange County Property Information 51400 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 7,593.31 Lab Parts&Supplies 51401 Flo-Systems, Inc. 707.23 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51402 Focdcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 529.11 Meeting Supplies 51403 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 21,123.94 Long-Term&Short-Term Disability Ins.Premium 51404 Foss Environmental 3.889.00 Professional Services-Sludge Transfer 51405 Fountain Valley Camera 29.41 Photo Supplies 51406 Franklin Covey 504.57 Office Supplies 51407 Frys Electronics 587.T Computer Supplies 51408 Gang Equipment&Maintenance 2,055.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51409 Garraft-Callahan Company 2,358.65 Chemicals 51410 Gates Fiberglass Installers 4,524.00 Fiberglass Repair to Scrubbers H&1 61411 Global Environmental Network, Inc. 2,612.60 Traffic Control Safety Training 51412 W W Grainger, Inc. 2,866.38 Electrical Parts,Supplies&Lacks 51413 Grating Pacific, Inc. 2.555.83 Fiberglass Grating 51414 Graybar 3,670.51 Enclosure&Panel 51416 Gaybor 5,0T .65 Light Crimp Plus Connector for Fiber Cable 51416 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 53.01 Janitorial Supplies 51417 Hach Company 1,621.73 Lab Parts&Supplies 51418 Harbour Engineering Group 19,269.89 Pump Supplies Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/16/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51419 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 2,465.93 Flow Meter, Parts&Supplies 51420 Herb's BlacMorest Bakery&Dell 47.25 Meeting Expenses 51421 HIM, Inc. 2,483.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51422 Home Depot 911.09 Misc. Repair&Maintenance Material 51423 Hopkins Technical Products 729.21 Pump Supplies 51424 Howard Ridley Company 5,043.60 Construction- Repair Water Leaks in Metering Vaults 51426 Hub Auto Supply 428.72 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 51426 Industrial Distribution Group 1,093.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51427 Industrial Networking Solutions 1,00024 Electrical Pads&Supplies 51428 Information Resources 255.00 Human Resources Service-Background Checks 51429 IBM 189.00 AS400 Maintenance 51430 Intratek Computer, Inc. 1,740.00 Network&Server Maintenance 51431 Ionics Instrument Business Group n5.73 Lab Parts&Supplies 51432 Iron Mountain 156.53 Bid Document Storage Fees J-39 51433 Irvine Pipe&Supply 431.74 Iron 51434 Irvine Technology Corporation 14,280.00 Temporary Employment Services 51435 ISA 87.00 Membership-Instrument Society of America 51436 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 2,989.95 Instrument Parts&Supplies 51437 J.L Wingert Company 2,758.40 Electrical Supplies 51438 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 13,751.02 Install Gas Flaps, Excavate&Expose Interplant Digester Gas 51439 Jay's Catering 1,336.62 Meeting Expenses 51440 Jim's Suspension Service 45.00 Automotive Parts&Supplies 51441 Johnson&Associates, L.LC. 1,045.00 Professional Services-Pay Range Analysis 51442 Johnstone Supply 3,264.79 Air Conditioner& Electrical Supplies 51443 JWC Environmental 9.897.92 Rebuild(1)Muffin Monster Assembly 51444 Keith Boger 910.00 O&M Training Registration 51445 Kelly Paper 101.48 Paper 51446 Knowledge Key Associates, Inc. 4.495.00 Information Technology Training Registration 51447 KL&P Marketing 1,433.31 Safety Incentive Items 51448 KW Communications Consulting Ill Community Outreach Re Bushard Trunkline Replacement Project 51449 Lab Support 3,96325 Temporary Employment Services 51450 Law/Crandall 4,531.61 Geotechnical Sane..3-25 51451 Luccrs 185.98 Meeting Expense 51452 Luedtke Crane Systems. L.L.C. 562.54 Crane Repairs-V-420 51453 LINJER 9,074.89 Professional Service-DART NO 9-22-99 51454 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 7,641.50 Professional Services-Corrosion Study&Interplant Gas Line Leak 51455 MaWac Electronics 22.05 Electrical Paris&Supplies 51466 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 1.261.58 Executive Disability Plan Premium 51457 Matrix Industries. Inc. 1,750.00 Professional Services-Remove&Dispose of Damaged Drywall in Operations Center 51458 Mc Junkin Corp—Ontario Branch 698.22 Plumbing Supplies 51459 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 4,960.73 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51460 Measurement Control Systems, Inc. 3,390.50 Mechanical Parts,Supplies& Repairs 51461 Mec Analytical System 9,370.00 Toxicity Analysis 51462 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 1,768.18 Mechanical Seal Repairs 51463 Media Clips, Inc. 84.19 Notices&Ads 51464 Medlin Controls Co. 118.57 Instrument Supplies 51465 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 23-404.17 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 51456 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 42.31 Janitorial Supplies Page 6of8 EXHIBITA t, Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51467 Mission Uniform Service 4.083.06 Uniform Rentals 51468 ModernAlr BB & M Air Conditioning, Inc. 7,088.00 Air Conditioner 51469 Motorola Communications& Electronics 12,684.59 Communication Equipment 61470 KIDS Consulting 22.183.20 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 61471 National Fire Protection Association 135.00 Membership 51472 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 3,600.00 High Voltage Electrical Safety Training 61473 Neal Supply Co. 124.55 Plumbing Supplies 51474 NeWersant of Southern California 17,658.77 Human Resources Security System Improvements 61475 Ninyo& Moore Corporate Accounting 394.23 Professional Services -Materiels Testing NO 6-24-98 51470 O.C. Business Journal 58.00 Subscription 51477 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,019.64 Office Supplies 51478 Olympic Creations 1,673.47 Printing Service -OCSD Logo Pin 51479 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 100.89 Janitorial Supplies 51480 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 5.41 Freight 51481 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 1,386.56 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51482 Oxygen Service Company 395.96 Specialty Oases 61483 OCB Reprographics $32.89 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 51484 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 513.97 Electrical Supplies 51485 Pace Analytic Services 250.00 High Resolution Analysis of Effluent& Blosollds 51480 Pacific Bell 34.77 Telephone Services 51487 Pacific Ball Internet Services 333.79 Internet Service 51488 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,428.78 Plumbing Supplies 51489 Pacific Pans& Controls 771.60 Instrument Repairs 51490 Palo Alto Design, Inc. 7,495.00 Publication - Executive Summary Report-Shoreline Investigation Phase III 51491 Parsons Infrastructure & Tech.Group 14.395.79 Professional Services -Asset Management Program 51492 Partners Consulting Services 01900.00 PIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 51403 Pans Unllm Nod 274.47 Automotive Supplies 51494 Pool Supply of Orange County 560.30 Pump 51495 Power Design 9,499.40 Computer- (1)Toshiba 1400 BE 51496 Power Bros.Machine, Inc. 868.26 Mechanical Pans,Supplies& Repairs 51497 Projects Partners 11,932.28 Temporary Employment Services 51498 Public Resources Advisory Group 9,598.76 Financial Advisory Services 61499 Pump Engineering 17,229.67 Pumps 51500 PCs Express 110.00 Courier Service 51501 Pump Engineering &/or CAN California 178.86 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 61502 Quality Tool& Equipment, Inc. 4,0a9.05 (1)The Changer 51503 R.F. MacDonald Co. 8.660.00 Repairs& Maintenance Service -Boller No. 1 51504 RemedyTemp, Inc. 5,363.15 Temporary Employment Services $1505 Richard Hawk& Company 4,000.00 Supervisor Safety Seminar 51500 Royce Multimedia, Inc. 83.51 Video Service 51507 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 389.47 Pump Supplies 61608 RSF Engineers 14,918.41 Engineering Services 2-24-1 51509 RPM Electric Motors 1.909.73 Electric Motor 61510 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 106.74 Paint Supplies 51511 Safety-Kleen 494.30 Pans Cleaning Service& Equipment Lease 61512 Sahl Computer Products,Inc. 1,736.00 Software/Hardware 51513 Shamrock Supply Co.. Inc. 187.45 Heavy Duty Hand Cleaner 51514 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 12.81 Mechanical Parts & Supplies Page 8 of a EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03M5103 Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description 51515 SkiNPath On-Site 5,100.00 On-Site Training 51516 Smith-Emery Company 822.00 Soil Testing NO 7-13-94 51517 So. Cal. Gas Company 13,220.76 Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel 51618 SoftChoice 9.696.43 Software 51619 Southern California Edison 8,187.97 Power 51520 Southwest Concrete 380.14 Concrete 51521 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 477.38 Stationery&Office Supplies 51522 Strategic Diagnostics, Inc. 994.11 Lab Parts& Supplies 51523 Summit Steel 492.99 Metal 51524 Sunset Industrial Parts 260.71 Mechanical Supplies 51525 Symcas-TSG 1,384.18 SCADA System VAX Maintenance Agreement 51526 SPX Valves& Control 4,960.69 Valves& Plumbing Supplies 51527 Taylor-Dunn 895.36 Electric Cart Paris 51528 Thermo Environmental Instruments 120.74 Mechanical Paris& Supplies 51529 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4,781.49 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51530 Thyssen Krupp Elevator 1.584.00 Elevator Maintenance 51531 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 51632 Tropical Plain Nursery, Inc. 180.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 51533 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. 249.08 Automotive Supplies 51534 US Filter Corporation 1.159.00 Service Agreement- Lab Purification System 51535 U.S.Composting Council 500.00 Membership 51536 Ultra Scientific 69.16 Lab Paris& Supplies 61637 Undersea Graphics, Inc. 4.500.00 Contract Service -Outfall Inspection 51538 The Unisource Corporation 800.63 Office Supplies 61639 United Parcel Service 51.50 Parcel Services 51540 Defense Finance and Accounting 4286.20 Professional Services J-86-Naval Post Graduate School 51541 Board of Regents 975.00 O & M Training Registration 51542 US Filter W estates Carbon 4.244.44 Carbon Filters 51543 Vallen Safety Supply Company 1235.25 Safety Supplies 51544 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 23,672.00 Temporary Employment Service 51545 Vapex. Inc. 2,631.56 Instrument Parts& Supplies 51546 Varian, Inc. 141.37 Lab Parts & Supplies 51547 Varian Associates,Inc. 4,798.92 Lab Instrument Maintenance 51548 Vedzon California 27.43 Telephone Services 51549 Village Nurseries 41.38 Landscaping Supplies 61550 VW R Scientific Products Corporation 3,082.16 Lab Parts& Supplies 51651 The Wackenhut Corporation 6.284.80 Security Guards 51652 Water Environment Federation 124.75 Publication 51553 Waxle Sanitary Supply 654.24 Janitorial Supplies 51554 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 2.798.78 Electrical Paris& Supplies 51555 Wilson Supply, Inc. 1,549.45 Instrument Parts & Supplies 51556 W EF Publications 49.98 Publication 51557 Xerox Corporation 11,700.57 Copier Leases 51558 Zee Medical 724.51 First Am Supplies 61559 3CMA 50.00 Notices & Ads 51560 Atias-Allied, Inc. 18.323.10 Construction -Natural Gas Line Replacement at Plant 1 51561 California Bank& Trust 14,012.00 Construction J-33-IA, Retention 51562 J W Contracting Corporation 21,659.00 Construction P2-60 Page 7018 E)HBITA 'r Claims Paid From 03/01/03 to 03/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Mariam Deacriptbn 51563 Union Bank of California 8.029.00 Construction P2-80, Retention 51584 Shabblr S. Secret 1.200.87 Meetingffmining Expense Reimbursement 51565 Bradley H.Cagle 410.68 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51566 Chandra R.Johannessan 317.07 Meeting Rralning Expanse Reimbursement 51S67 Julla A.Matsumoto 403.04 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51S66 David Rodriguez 135.45 Meeting Rralning Expense Reimbursement 51569 Douglas M. Stewart 478.09 M eelingtT raining Expense Reimbursement 51570 Daniel R.Tremblay 170.11 Meeting/T raining Expense Reimbursement 51571 Ken H.Wong 537.09 M eetingIT raining Expense Reimbursement S1572 Beach,James 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51573 Campos, Frank 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Sepik Tanks 51574 Edwards. Seen 003.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51575 Flippen, Barbara 166.69 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51576 Foe, Sea-Khoon 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51577 Hack,Join as 1.142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 61576 K & K, Inc. 3.402.49 User Fes Refund Re Septic Tanks 51679 Local Agency Formation Core in lesion 11160.00 Annexation Fees 51580 Mattoon, Shifty 100.33 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51581 Neill,W Illlam 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 61582 Oldfleld, David G or Roberts 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51683 Orange County Cemetery District 117.98 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51584 Orange County Sanitation District 932.09 Petty Cash Relmb. 51585 Seeley.Tony 185.69 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51586 Shultz,Douglas or L.Triner 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51587 Starks, Dorothy 803.53 Ul Fae Refund Re Septic Tanks 51588 W Illlam Bousem•n 82.04 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 51589 CMTA 2003 Conference 235.00 Moeling/Training Expense Reimbureem ant Total Account, Payable •Warrant, $ 8,085,413.05 Payroll Disbursements 29264 -29369 Employee Paychecks $ 153,827.07 Biweekly Payroll 03/05/03 29370 -29374 Interim Paychecks 16,079.62 Termination,Timesheat Correction, Reissue Returned Direct Deposit B Leave Payout 02626 .63106 Direct Deposit Statements 839,560.77 Biweekly Payroll 03/05/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,009,767.46 Wire Transfer Payment, Chase Bank of Texas,National Association 33.822.44 February Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Tax.a.National Assoc latlon 128.935.06 Societe Generale February Swap Payment on 1903 Certificates of Participation Total W Ire Transfer Payments $ 182.757.50 Total Claims Paid 03101/03 .03/15/03 If 9.257.038.01 Pegg 0 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 51590 Ark Construction Company S 25,000.00 General and Tunnel Cleaning Services at Pits. 1 a 2 51591 Orange County Sanitation District 565,141.80 Payroll EFT Reimbursement $1592 Orange County Water District 251,061.18 OW RS Protect J-36 51593 Palnewebber Incorporated 38,632AS COP Remarketing Agreement 51594 Southern California Edison 34,587.75 Power 51595 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 151.003.25 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 61596 Airgaa Safety 3.155.94 Safety Supplies & Equipment 51597 American Red Cross $79.50 CPR Training and Misc.Supplies 31598 Aquarian Coatings 670.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 51599 Arnold D. Purisch, Ph.D.,Inc. 2,000.00 Medical Screening 51600 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 51801 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 51602 Compressor Components of California 3,264.83 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51603 Consumers Pipe& Supply Co. 304.00 Plumbing Supplies 51604 Coun Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 51005 Electra-Bond,Inc. 7,370.10 Coating for New Auger 51600 Empire Pipe Cleaning & Equipment, Inc. 8,793.32 Sawerline Cleaning-City of Tustin, Unincorporated O.C. a Irvine 51007 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,945.43 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical& Dependent Care 51608 Employers Group 500.00 Supervisor& Management Training 51609 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 81010 Franchise Tax Board 229.01 Wage Garnishment 51011 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 51012 Intl.Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,253.29 Dues Deduction 51013 Invensys Systems,Inc. 22,845.90 Instrument Supplies 51014 JMH Consulting 3,000.00 On-Site Training- Hiring It Interviewing Workshop 51016 Shirley A. McCracken 577.77 MeetingRralning Expense Reimbursement 51010 McGarry Central 20.43 Office Equipment Maintenance Agreement 51617 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 673.23 Mechanical Parts,Supplies& Tools 51519 Narrow Guage Inn,L.L.C. 272.50 Administration Meeting Registration 61019 National Bond It Trust 2,198.80 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 51620 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 2,512.71 Plumbing Parts& Supplies 51021 OCEA 515.30 Dues Deduction 51622 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 51623 Court Order 290.00 Wage Garnishment 51824 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,467.00 Dun Deduction 51095 Shuraluck Sales & Engineering 618.30 Plumbing Pans & Supplies 51626 SkIIIleath Seminars 170.00 Communications Meeting Registration 51027 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 51828 Snap On Industrial 524.73 Tools 61629 So.Cal.Gas Company 16.143.07 Natural Gas 51830 Southern California Edison 1,900.48 Power $1631 SPX Valves& Control 35.56 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51632 Thompson Industrial Supply. Inc. 2.101.91 Mechanical Supplies 51633 United Stales Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 51834 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 31835 Volition California 1.855.90 Telephone Services 51030 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment Page 1 018 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51637 WEF 170.00 Membership -W star Environm ant Federation 51638 Xerox Corporation 2,401.43 Copier Leases 51639 Rebecca A.Brooks 150.00 MeetinglTralning Expense Reimbursement 51640 Robert P.Ghlrelll 896.78 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51041 Wanda R. Hagerty 103.44 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51642 Vladlm it A. Kogan 257.00 Maeting/T raining Expense Reimbursement 51643 Yu-Ll Tsai 131.00 Meedn9/Training Expense Reimbursement 51644 City of Seal Beach 240.00 Permit Fees 3-12-4 51645 United States Postal Service 750.00 Postage 51046 Air Products It Chemicals 25,756.02 O & M Agreement Day Gan Sys MO 5-6-69 51647 American Express 52,290.54 Purchasing Card Program.Misc.Supplies& Services 51648 Bell Land Surveying 46,431.25 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 51849 Black & Veatch Corporation 476,948.21 Engineering Services PI-46,J-77& P2.85 51650 Brown and Caldwell 67.963.04 Engineering Services 1-98 51651 City of Fountain Valley 26,632.00 Water Use 51052 Coral Energy Resources, L.P. 64,857.46 Natural Gas 51053 Cite Specialty Chemicals Corporation 27,003.85 Cationic Polymer 51654 Dell Direct Sales, L.P. 34.555.43 (20)Computers& (10) Switches 51656 Empire Pipe Cleaning & Equipment,Inc. 37.175.17 Sewarllne Cleaning -City of Tustin, Unincorporated O.C.It Irvin 51650 General Petroleum 37,544.91 Unleaded Gasoline 51657 Graybar 33,112.78 Computer Hardware/Software 51658 IPMC c/o Parsons 464,927.00 Professional Services- Program/Project Management 51669 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 56,229.60 Construction- Drain Pipe,Confined Space Entry Insp., Pedestal 51660 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. 202,733.00 Ferric Chloride NO 9.27-95 51661 Program Planning Professionals 94,910.97 Engineering Training-MS Project 2002 51662 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 156,147.1a Sodium Hypochlorlle 51663 R Company, Ltd. 48,300.00 Records Management Software 51664 Southern California Edison 58,281.56 Power 51665 Southern Counties Oil Co. 25,154.07 Diesel Fuel 61666 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 279,244.86 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 51667 Systime Cam puler Corp 09,800.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One World XE Implement[ 51668 SPEC Services, Inc. 25,377.30 Engineering Services J-33-1 51669 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 127,358.29 Residuals Removal NO 3.29-95 51670 U.S. Peroxide 92,402.04 Hydrogen Peroxide It Ferrous Chloride 51671 Woodruff.Spradlin It Smart 116,815.18 Legal Services MO 7.26-95 51672 Xerox Corporation 25,998.63 Copier Leases 51673 Ken Thompson, Inc. 285,500.00 Construction 5-46 61674 Steve P Rados, Inc. 166,226.90 Construction 1-2-4 51675 12 Technologies 2,068.15 Software 51578 A-Plus System 1.525.00 Notices&Ads 51677 Abatlx Environmental Corp. 220.89 Hardware 51678 Great American Printing Co. 1,610.25 Paper 61679 Agllent Technologies, Inc. 142.90 Lab Parts& Supplies 61680 Airborne Express 102,10 Air Freight 61681 Alrgas-W eat 12.80 Lab Supplies 51682 Alrgas Safety 2,520.67 Safety Supplies& Equipment 51683 Allied Electronics,Inc. 129.58 Electrical Supplies 51684 American Airlines 5,109.50 Travel Services Page 2 of EXHIBIT e Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51685 American Red Cross 24.00 CPR Classes & Misc.supplies 51686 Analytical Products G roup,Inc. 452.00 Lab Pam & Supplies 51687 Apploon9 Em ploym ant Service 11850.88 Tam porely Em ploym ant 8ervices 51688 Applied Industrial Technology 266.81 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51680 Aquarium Doctor 146.55 Human Resources Aquarium Service 51690 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin. Bldg.Atrium 51691 Awards &Trophies Company 23.17 Plaques 51692 AGM Electronics, Inc. 301.83 Electronic Supplies 51693 American Telephone& Telegraph Corp. $92.08 Telephone Service 51694 AT&T Wireless Services 3.023.17 Wireless Phone Services 61695 Battelle 200.00 Lab Training Registration 51696 Battery Specialties 328.64 Batteries 51697 Baudville 45.01 Stationery& Office Supplies 51698 Bentley Systems,Inc. 950.61 Software 51699 Bird-%,Inc. 759.00 Super Pro Electric System 51700 Brooks Instrument Division 288.58 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51701 Cardloek Fuels 926.75 Fueling Servlses 51702 Carollo Engineers 5.111.27 Professional Services Pt-00 & P2.60 51703 Cashco,Inc.,c/o Porten Ind.,Inc. 1.099.51 Valves 51704 Cel12Cell 235.24 Inst. Parts& Supplies 51705 City of Anaheim 204.96 Admin.Meeting Expenses 61706 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 19,876.24 Professional Services -Hazardous Energy Control Project 61707 Computer Protection Technology,Inc, 5.899.53 Batteries 51708 Conex International 275.00 Professional Services P2-60 51709 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 2.740.20 Electrical Supplies 51710 Corporate Express 10,727.54 Office Supplies 51711 Cost Containment Solutions 2.103.97 Worker's Comp.Services 51712 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 739.49 Malnt.Agreement-RepalrMstallatlon of Base,Handheld& V9h 51713 County Wholesale Electric Co. 69.82 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51714 Culligan of Orange County 371.46 Meint.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener System 51715 Cruse Industries 17.956.80 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 51716 CA Emissions Program 5.40 Vehicle Smog Testing 51717 CAPIO 064.00 Communications Meeting Registration (Ca18.Assoc.of Public In 51718 CEPA Company 1,395.00 Certification of Fume Hoods, Blo-Salety Cabinets,Total Exhaus 51719 CPI International 781.87 Lab Supplies 51720 CR&R, Inc. 1,298.00 Container Rentals 61721 CW EA 1.135.00 0 & M Training Registration 51722 C W EA 2002 Annual Conference 1,770.00 Compliance Meeting Registration and O & M Training Reglstratl 51723 David Kirby Company 1,170.00 Remove and Install Linoleum Tiles $1724 David's Tree Service 3.830.00 Tree Melnt.Service 51725 Dal Mar Analytical 6.859.00 Analysis of Blosolka and Wastewater 51726 Diamond H Recognition 576.20 Employee Service Awards 51727 DlgiPhoto 14.62 Photographic Services 51728 Dionex Corporation 2.201.00 Lab Instrument Repairs 51729 Duthie Power Services 1,060.00 Generator Supplies 51730 E. Sam Jonas Distributors,Inc. 245.98 Electrical Supplies 51731 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 1,843.00 Medical Screening 61732 Electro-Test, Inc. 2,309.27 Electrical Supplies Page 3 of 8 E%HIBIT B Claims Paid From 03MOM to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 61733 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 1.342.60 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical& Dependent Care $1734 Enchanter, Inc. 4,000.00 Ocean Monitoring NO S-24.95 51735 Environmental& Occupational Risk Mgmt. 1.749.00 Prof.Services- Inspect Wall Cavities at Operations Center Bast 51736 Environmental Engineering & Contracting 5,000.00 Prof.Services- Urban Runoff Triennial Review 51737 Environmental Science Associates 3,138.92 Professional Services J-40-5 51738 Eurotherm Controls 1.664.83 Electrical Parts& Supplies 51739 ENS Resources,Inc. 15,025.08 Professional Services- Legislative Advocate 51740 Fed Ex Corporation 359.15 Air Freight 51741 First American Real Estate Solutions 474.90 Orange County Property Information 51742 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 13,356.00 Lab Parts & Supplies 51743 Foodcran Correa S Refreshment Services 124.60 Meeting Supplies 51744 Forestry Suppliers 349.85 Lab Pads& Supplies 61745 Franklin Covey 274.60 Office Supplies $1746 Fry's Electronics 1,151.75 Computer Supplies 61747 Full Spectrum Analydcs 800.00 Lab Instrument Repairs 51748 G. E.Supply 1.391.69 Electrical Parts It Supplies $1749 Gary Goodman 240.50 Consultant Meeting Expense-Coordinated Commercial Enterpr 51750 Gates Fiberglass Installed, 723.56 Construction -Install(2) Fiberglass Man Ways at Pelt. 1,Bamcr 51751 George Yardley Co. 370.49 Automatic Switch Valves 51752 Gerhardt's, Inc. 3.526.34 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51753 Getings Castle 117.32 Lab Parts& Supplies 51754 Golden Bell Products 084.00 Contractual Services- Insecticide Coating of Manholes 51755 Golden State Controls 1,847.48 Instrument Parts& Supplies 51756 Goldenwest Window Service 2.462.00 Window Cleaning Service- Spec. #990015 51757 W W Grainger,Inc. 11,939.28 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51758 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 80.34 Janitorial Supplies 51759 Hach On Penton Industries 413.86 Chemicals 51760 Harold Primrose Ice 55.50 Ica For Samples 51761 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 1,509.21 Plumbing Supplies 51762 Herb's Slackforest Bakery & Deli 71.76 Meeting Expenses 51763 Harman Miller Workplace Resource 1.271.46 Office Chairs 51704 Hill Brothers 14.876.50 Chemicals-Odor& Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkllne 51765 Hillman Instrument Company 500.27 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51766 Home Depot 1,221.24 Misc. Repair& Maintenance Materiel 51767 Hopkins Technical Products 2,021.69 Pump Supplies 51788 Horizon Technology 16,899.22 Lab Instruments & Supplies 51769 House of Batteries 275.54 Batteries 51770 Hub Auto Supply 220.75 Truck Parts S1771 Hydrotex 4,435.15 Luba Oil 51772 HCS Cutler 863.38 Ladders 51773 Ideas 4,000.30 Lab Pads& Supplies 51774 Industrial Distribution Group 449.66 Paint Supplies 51776 Industrial Filter Manufacturers,Inc. 1,857.75 Filters $1776 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 775.21 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51777 Roto Rooter 6.088.06 CCTV Vldeoing of Trunkllne Sewers 51778 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 936.211 Lab Parts& Supplies 51779 IBM 1.537.04 Maintenance Agreement AS-400 51780 Inierocean Systems Inc. 2.261.56 S4 Extended Power Supply Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT IS Claims Paid From 03/1G=to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51781 Interstate Battery Systems 433.31 Batteries 51782 Intralek Computer, Inc. 2.197.80 Network& Sarver Maintenance 51783 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 310.00 ORshe Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 51704 Irvine Ranch Water District 60.01 Water Use 51705 loco, Inc. 575.21 Lab Parts& Supplies 51786 IECOC 50.00 Freight 51787 James F. McConnell 1,625.00 Administration Meeting Expense 51788 Jay's Catering 11083.51 Meeting Expenses 51789 Thermo Westronics 1.566.76 Instrument Supplies 51790 Johnstone Supply 11351.95 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51701 JPC Construction 2,400.30 Construction- Install Bird Screen at Pit.2 Dowatering Bay Area Project 51792 K.P.Lindstrom, Inc. 7,435.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12.9.90 $1793 Kaman Industrial Technologies 778.34 Inalrum ant Supplies 61794 Kelly Paper 730.40 Paper 51795 Kings County Tax Collector 11,171.76 Property Taxes 51796 KL&P Marketing 1,523.03 Safety Incentive Items 51707 L & N Uniform Supply Co. 980.92 OCSO Jackets for Source Control Personnel 51798 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 270.51 Safety Supplies 51799 Lab Support 1,348.75 Temporary Employment Services 61800 Lascomm 7,330.90 Computer Software/Hardware 51801 Los & Ro, Inc. 20.113.57 Professional Services J-71.7 51802 Lhecom-Safety,Inc. 200.00 Repair&Calibrate Odor Control Equipment 51803 Lucci's 93.75 Meeting Expense 51804 LINJER 4,507.97 Professional Service-DART NO 9.22.99 51805 Management Technologies 3.900.00 Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit 51808 Marton, Phelps& Phillips, L.L.P. 5,000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 51807 Denise M. Martinez 970.00 M oeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 61808 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 80.48 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51809 McRay Industries, Inc. 5.417.18 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51810 Measurement Control Systems, Inc. 3,284.22 Electrical Parts& Supplies 51811 Mac Analytical System 24.352.00 Toxicity Analysis 51812 Medlin Controls Co. 2,538.44 Instrument Supplies 51813 Mld-W set Associates 3,632.26 Pump Supplies 51814 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 9,233.87 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51815 Mission Uniform Service 4.082.69 Uniform Rentals 51818 Morton Sell 600.07 Sam 51817 Mountain Valley Express Co.,Inc. 422.07 Freight 61816 MSC Applied Environmental Soleness 1,420.00 Lab Analysis- Benthlc Infaunal Sample 51610 MDS Consulting 7,924.80 Prof.Services -Surveying Various Capital Projects 51020 National Safety Council 495.18 On-Sme Training •Defensive Driving $1821 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 4.294.95 0 & M and Human Resources Training Registration 51022 Neal Supply Co. 1,347.25 Plumbing Supplies 61823 Newark Electronics 1.080.04 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51824 Hickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 2,292.61 Oil $1025 Ninyo& Moore Corporate Accounting 84.66 Professional Services P1-37 61020 The Norco Companlee 170.78 Mall Delivery Service 51827 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 20.75 Steel Tags 51828 NPELRA Annual Training Conference 1,125.00 Human Resources Training Registration Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51733 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 1.342.60 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical& Dependent Care 51734 Enchanter,Inc. 4.000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.24-95 51736 Environmental&Occupational Risk Mgml. 1,749.00 Prof.Services-Inspect Wall Cavities at Operations Center Bast 51736 Environmental Engineering If Contracting 51000.00 Prof.Services-Urban Runoff Triennial Review 51737 Environmental Science Associates 3,138.92 Professional Service.J-40-5 51738 Eurotharm Controls 1,664.83 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51739 ENS Resources, Inc. 15,025.08 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 51740 Fsd Ex Corporation 369.15 Air Freight 51741 First American Real Estate Solutions 474.90 Orange County Property Information 61742 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 13,366.00 Lab Parts& Supplies 51743 Foodcraft Coffee It Refreshment Services 124.60 Meeting Supplies 51744 Forestry Suppliers 349.85 Lab Parts & Supplies 51745 Franklin Covey 274.06 Office Supplies 51746 Fry's Electronics 1,151.75 Computer Supplies 51747 Full Spectrum Analytics 000.00 Lab Instrument Repairs 51748 G. E. Supply 1.301.59 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51749 Gary Goodman 240.50 Consultant Meeting Expense- Coordinated Commercial Enterpr 51750 Gates Fiberglass Installers 723.50 Construction-Install(2) Fiberglass Man Ways at Pelt. 1,Barscr 51751 George Yardley Co. 570.49 Automatic Switch Valves 51752 Gerhardt's, Inc. 3,526.34 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51753 Gatinge Castle 117.32 Lab Parts It Supplies 51754 Golden Ball Products 684.00 Contractual Services- Insecticide Coaling of Manholes 51755 Golden Stale Controls 1,847.48 Instrument Parts It Supplies 31756 Goldenwest Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990015 51757 W W Grainger, Inc. 11,939.28 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51758 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 80.34 Janitorial Supplies 51759 Hach c/o Poston Industries 413.88 Chemicals 51760 Harold Primrose Ice 56.50 Ice For Sam pies 51761 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 1,509.21 Plumbing Supplies . 51762 Herb's Blackforest Bakery It Dell 71.75 Meeting Expenses 51763 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 1,271.46 Office Chair. 51764 Hill Brothers 14,876.50 Chemicals-Odor& Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 51706 Hillman Instrument Company 500.27 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 61706 Home Depot 1,221.24 Misc.Repair It Maintenance Material 51767 Hopkins Technical Products 2.021.69 Pump Supplies 51768 Horizon Technology 18,899.22 Lab Instruments It Supplies 51769 House of Batteries 278.54 Batteries 51770 Hub Auto Supply 220.75 Truck Parts 51771 Hydrotex 4.435.16 Lubs 011 51772 HCS Cutler 883.30 Ladders 61773 Idexx 4,008.30 Lab Parts & Supplies 51774 Industrial Distribution Group 449.00 Paint Supplies 51775 Industrial Filter Manufacturers, Inc. 1,857.75 Filters 51776 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 775.21 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51777 Roto Rooter 8,088.06 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 51778 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 936.21 Lab Parts It Supplies 51779 IBM 1.537.04 Maintenance Agreement AS-400 51780 Interocean Systems Inc. 2.281.58 84 Extended Power Supply Pape 4 of Emlarre ., Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51781 Interstate Battery Systems 433.31 Batteries 51782 Intratek Computer, Inc. 2,197.80 Network & Server Maintenance 51783 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 310.00 Offeile Back-Up Tape Storage for NIT Server 51704 Irvine Ranch Water District 66.01 Water Use 51785 loco,Inc. 575.21 Lab Parts & Supplies 51786 IECOC 50.00 Freight 51787 James F.McConnell 1.625.00 Administration Meeting Expanse 51788 Jay's Catering 1.003.51 Meeting Expenses 51789 Thermo Weelronles 1,505.76 Instrument Supplies 51790 Johnstone Supply 1,351.05 Mechanical Pans It Supplies 61791 JPC Construction 2.480.30 Construction - Install Bird Screen at Pit.2 Dowalering Bay Area Project 51792 K.P.Lindstrom, Inc. 7.435.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12.0.00 51793 Kaman Industrial Technologies 778.34 Instrument Supplies 51794 Kelly Paper 730.40 Paper 51795 Kings County Tax Collector 11.171.70 Property Taxes 51796 KL&P Marketing 1,523.63 Safety Incentive Items 61797 L & N Uniform Supply Co. 000.92 OCSD Jackets for Source Control Personnel 51798 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 270.51 Safely Supplies 51799 Lab Support 1,348.75 Temporary Employment Services 51600 Lascomm 7,330.99 Computer Software/Hardware 51801 Lae& Flo, Inc. 20,113.57 Professional Services J-71-7 51802 Llfecom-Safety,Inc. 200.00 Repair& Calibrate Odor Control Equipment 61803 Lucci's 93.75 Meeting Expense 51804 LINJER 4,507.07 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 51805 Management Technologies 3,900.00 Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Perm It 51806 Monett, Phelps& Phillips, L.L.P. 5.000.00 Strategic Planning & Advocacy $1007 Denise M. Martinez 970.00 Meating/rraining Expense Reimbursement 51808 MCMasler-Carr Supply Co. 80.48 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51609 MCRay Industries,Inc. 5,417.18 Mechanical Pans It Supplies 51810 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 3,284.22 Electrical Pans&Supplies 51811 Mac Analytical System 24,362.00 Toxicity Analysis 51812 Medlin Controls Co. 2,538.44 Instrument Supplies 51813 Mld-W set Associates 3.632.28 Pump Supplies 51814 Midway Mfg It Machining Co. 9,233.87 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51815 Mission Uniform Service 4,052.69 Uniform Rentals $1816 Morton Sall 600.07 Sall 51817 Mountain Valley Express Co., Inc. 422.07 Freight 51818 NBC Applied Environmental Sciences 1,420.00 Lab Analysis- Benthlc Infaunal Sample 61819 MDS Consulting 7,924.00 Prof,Services -Surveying Various Capital Projects 51820 National Safety Council 495.18 On-Silo Training -Defensive Driving 51821 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 4,294.95 O It M and Human Resources Training Registration 51822 Neal Supply Co. 1.347.25 Plumbing Supplies 51823 Newark Electronics 1,080.04 Electrical Pans & Supplies 61824 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 2.292.61 Oil 51825 Ninyo& Moore Corporate Accounting 84.66 Professional Services PI.37 51826 The Norco Companies 170.78 Mall Delivery Service $1027 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 20.75 Steel Tags 51828 NPELRA Annual Training Conference 1.125.00 Human Resources Training Registration Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03MGM to 03131/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 61829 NRD Energy, Inc. 2,170.30 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51830 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3.493.97 Office Supplies 51831 Omega Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,184.97 Janitorial Supplies S1832 Orange County Vector Control District 0.403.83 Peet Control 51833 Oxygen Service Company 2,914.U8 Specialty Oases 51834 OI Analytical 440.10 Lab Pans & Supplies 51835 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 1,28123 Electrical Parts & Supplies 51836 Pacific Bell 1,208.13 Telephone Services 51837 Pacific Bell/WOrtdCom 5.40 Telephone Service 51838 Pacific Mechanical Supply 840.17 Plumbing Pans & Supplies 51839 Parker Hannifin Corporation 404.16 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51840 Parker Supply Company 8,980.40 Mechanical Seals& Misc.Supplies 61841 Partners Consulting Services 11,580.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 61842 Pans Unlimited 53.69 Automotive Supplies 51843 Paulus Engineering, Inc. 12,456.00 Construction- Roadway Repairs at Arroyo& Skyline Drive 51844 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 2,454.80 Lab Pans& Supplies 51845 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 493.35 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 51646 Projects Partners 16,901.31 Temporary Employment Services 51847 Protean Petroleum Services, Inc. 20,380.00 Testing& Certification of Underground Storage Tanks 51948 Pump Engineering 2,328.70 Pump Supplies 51849 PAPA 110.00 O & M Training Registration 51850 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service 518S1 PSB Industries 1.553.40 Electrical Supplies 51862 R.L.Abbott&Associates 6.000.00 Kern County Blosolids Consulting Services 51853 Regents of Univ.of California 10,S03.85 Professional Services J-85 51054 Reliastar 9,334.30 Employee Medical Health Premium 51855 Robert J.Lung It Assoc. 9,590.58 Prof. Services-Aerial Photos of Plants 1 & 2 51856 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 196.42 Plumbing Parts& Supplies 61857 RBF Consulting 3,460.21 Professional Services- Roof for College Pump Sta. Pump Pedestal 51858 RIM Controls 152.73 Charts 51859 RPM Electric Motors 1.562.91 Motor Repairs 51860 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 58.89 Paint Supplies 51861 S & J Supply Co., Inc. 1.695.99 Pump Supplies 51862 Schwing America, Inc. 3,328.96 Pump Supplies 51863 Schwing America, Inc. 1,950.00 O & M Training Registration 51864 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 3,896.19 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 51866 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 138.97 W ater Use 51866 Sent Computer Products, Inc. 1,853.76 Computer Hardware/Software 51867 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 237.74 Building and Construction Materiel 51868 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 1,292.39 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51869 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 5,738.45 Lab Pane & Supplies 51870 Smith-Emery Company 753.50 Materials Testing, Inspection & Oeotachnical Engineering for Capital Projects 51871 Snap On Industrial 145.33 Tools 51872 SoftChoics 9.249.32 Software 51873 Southern California Edison 28.32 Power 51874 Sperkletts 1,358.78 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 51875 Strata International, Inc. 505.40 Bacterial Treatment& Aeration of Wet Wet]at Michelson 61876 Summit Steel 1,040.59 Metal Page 6 cf 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Dewriptlon 51877 Sunset Industrial Parts 2.712.27 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51878 SARBS-CW EA 40.00 O & M Training Registration 51879 SPX Valves& Controls 874.43 Valves 51880 Taylor-Dunn 2,323.38 Electric Carl Parts 51881 Term lnlx International Co. 4.140.00 Pest Control 51882 The Lewis Group 6,826.31 Consulting Service-Capital Project Management Process 51883 The Orange County Register 3,789.12 Notices It Ads 51884 Thermo Electron Spectroscopy 97.52 Lab Parts& Supplies 51885 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 11980.53 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51886 Thyssen Krupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 51887 Daly Pilot 100.00 Notices & Ads 51888 Tran Consulting Engineers 1,442.00 Professional Services- Fiber Optic Cabling Extension Pit.2 51889 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 14,708.18 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11.94 51890 Truck& Auto Supply, Inc. 19.80 Automotive Supplies 51601 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 2,002.00 Lab Services 51092 Two Wheels One Planet 1,909.84 (6)Bikes 51093 U.S. Matra Group, Inc. 24.785.00 Janitorial& Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 & 2 51 B94 Ultra Scientific 664.12 Lab Parts& Supplies $1095 The Unlsouree Corporation 180.07 Stationary& Office Supplies 5189a United Parcel Service 890.99 Parcel Services 51897 US Equipment Co., Inc. 2,644.40 Coolant 51098 US Filter W estates Carbon 2,398.54 Fillers 51899 Varian, Inc. 15.31 Lab Parts& Supplies 51900 Verizon California 960.35 Telephone Services $1901 Verne's Plumbing 175.00 Service Contract-Testing&Cart.Backflow Devices at Pits. t & 2 8 Pump Sta. 51902 Vision Service Plan 0,823.72 Vision Service Premium 51903 Vortex Industries,Inc. 1.979.90 Door Repair 51904 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 6,428.11 Lab Parts& Supplies 51905 The Wackenhut Corporation 18,835.36 Security Guards 51908 Waxla Sanitary Supply 71.70 Janitorial Supplies 51907 Western States Controls c/o GM Cooke 592.82 Instrument Supplies 51900 Western Wholesale 484.10 Leaf Blowers 31909 WEF 974.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 51910 Xerox Corp. 995.00 Administrative Services On-Site Xerox Training 51011 Yokogswa Corp.of America 388.98 Chart Paper 51912 Atlas-Allied,Inc. 20,524.80 Construction - Natural O86 Line Replacement at Pit. 1 61013 Union Bank of California 20,914.10 Construction 1-2-4. Retention 51914 Laurie S.Bluestein 1,275.46 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51915 Patrick B.Carnahan 042.70 Meating/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 51916 David M.Chafe 981.81 Meeting/rralning Expense Reimbursement 51917 Kimberly C.Christensen 1,625.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51910 James M. Elo 428.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51019 Daniel R. Miranda 713.35 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51020 Peter M. Morrison 752.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51921 Samuel L.Mowbray 168.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement $1922 Wendy T. Sevenandt 942.96 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51923 Robert J.Taylor 2,104.41 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 51924 Donald B.Van Voorst 720.55 MeetingRralning Expense Reimbursement Page 7 of 6 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/03 to 03/31/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51925 CVWMA 75.00 Compliance Meeting Registration(Central Valley Wastewater Mgrs.Assoc.) 51926 Orange County Sanitation District 1,093.48 Petty Cash Relmb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,190,520.72 Payroll Disbursements 29375-29508 Employee Paychecks $ 175,184,16 Biweekly Payroll 03/19/03 29613-29615 Interim Paycheck $ 10,817.31 Termination Paycheck 83107-83589 Direct Deposit Statements 854,183.83 Biweekly Payroll 03/19/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,040,185.30 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust 19,023.09 March Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 19,023.09 Total Claims Paid 03/16/03-03/31/03 $ 6,249,729.11 Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT B .-= BOARD OF DIRECTORS MmUng Date To Bd.of Dtr. 4/23/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-29—SHEAHOMES ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition requesting annexation of 4.80 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Bolas Chica Avenue and Los Patos Avenue, bordering the East Garden Grove Winterburg channel in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-08, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-29— Shea Homes Annexation). SUMMARY • OCSD received a request from Ron Metzler who represents Shea Homes L.P to annex 4.80 acres to OCSD. This annexation contains two (2) parcels, Assessor Parcel Nos. 110-016-23 and 110-016-19 annexing together with one landowner. • This project will be annexed to the City of Huntington Beach (City). The City will have the developer build a public sewer to serve the new housing tract development. Eight (8) homes will be constructed in the 4.80 acres being annexed to OCSD. • Shea Homes will pay the OCSD sanitary sewer service charges to the City when building permits are issued. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties. Board of Directors approved this action and it became effective March 14, 1989. Under this Tax Exchange, OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of$30,027.00 includes the following: LAFCO Processing Fee $ 1,150.00 OCSD Processing Fee 500.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee 300.00 CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee 43.00 OCSD Annexation Acreage Fee $q TOTAL ANNEXATION FEE $30,027.00 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption will be filed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map RLC:sa GMtg1obaMgenda Draft ReportsVolnl Boards\Shea Homes MnemUon.doc ne„x,, WWI Page 2 EXHIBIT"A" OCSD—29 SHEA HOMES REORGANIZATION(RO 03-01) TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT A parcel of land in the County of Orange,State of California,being all of Parcels B and C and a portion of Parcel A of the land described in the deed recorded September 19, 1996, as Instrument No. 19960479182 of Official Records of said -County, said parcel of land being described as follows: COMMENCING at Orange County Surveyor's Horizontal Control Station CPS No. "5096", having a coordinate value (U.S. Survey Feet) of North 2208592.387 and East 6016934.826 based upon the California Coordinate System (CCS83), Zone VI 1983 NAD (1991.35 epoch O.C.S. CPS adjustment) as shown on Record of Survey 92-1031, filed in Book 150, pages 1 through 9, inclusive, of Record of Surveys in the Office of the County Recorder of said Orange County; Thence South 10"45'25" East, 2494.02 feet to an angle point in the Westerly boundary of the Orange County Sanitation District per Annexation No. 15 to Orange County Sanitation District No. 11, said point being at the Northwesterly terminus of the course shown on said Annexation as"N45"35'1l"W, 4026.59"', and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along said Annexation boundary South 45"35'11" East 326.03 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of Orange County Flood Control District Parcel No. C5-101, 196.00 feet wide, per the deed recorded in Book 7181, Page 748 of said Official Records; Thence leaving said annexation boundary and along said Northerly right-of-way line South 63040'29"West 794.05 feet to the Southwest comer of said Parcel C; Thence along the Northwesterly boundary of said Parcel C the following courses: North 26019151" West 95.04 feet, North 18"07'10" East 231.15 feet, North 2V37'51" East 37.58 feet, North 57"36'54" East 150.89 feet, North 44"4913" East 172.30 feet and North 32"53'40" East 47.24 feet to the Northerly line of Parcel 7 of Corporation Quitclaim Deed recorded February 22, 1974 in Book 1180, page 287 of said Official Records; March 13,2003 WO No.0061-I5377X Page 1 of2 H&A Legal No 5654 By B. Hunsaker Checked By j.Stablein EXHIBIT"A" I. OCSD—29 SHEA HOMES REORGANIZATION (RO 03-01) TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Thence continuing along said Parcel C boundary and along the boundary of said Parcel B, and said Northerly line of Parcel 7, North 89"58'29" East 155.96 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. The hereinabove describe parcel of land containing 4.884 Acres, more or less. Unless otherwise noted, all bearings and distances in this description are ground baud on the California Coordinate System, (CCS83) Zone VI NAD 1983 (1991.35 epoch O.C.S. CPS Adjustment).To obtain grid distance,multiply ground distance by 0.99997623. As shown on Exhibit"B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. This proposal was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. 1p,ND S& Bruce F. Fo Hunsaker �o Exp.12n1104 Bruce . Hunsaker, L.S. 5921 ' • No.5921 My L(cense Expires: December 31:2004' dsT 3 Date: '� � ��OFCpC� This proposal does meet the approval of the Orange County Surveyor's Office. Dated this jj�y of_ , 2003. � O L By: Ll2y co< as, County Surveyor;L.S. 4408 O O Ccense Expires: 9/30/05 j ' IXP.` 05 m No.4408 `rT,q OF CAS March 13, 2003 WO No.0061-15377X Page 2 of 2 H&A Legal No 5654 By B. Hunsaker Checked By J.Stablein EXHIBIT "B" SHEET��Bmm VMAP OCSD - 29 SHEA HOMES REORGANIZATION(RO 03-01) TO THE ORANGE COUNTYmSANITATION DISTRICT �N^�+ rrn� WATGEmxrYNo.n W nE camw swlunoxPLEANEswum¢mW . asI.o[a,Rr,.a nu.r m[ oy W M WmW swung asmice nn. x °Rxxasauxn vassWn's amu � 7 qam �'+ Za�N \\9. BUS PROPOSAL WAS PREPARED BY ME R1 � CtA G9 OR UNDER NY DWCnw. � L+b y ZO �g2 pf\• k Y s \g96 `� BnmF /�F. Y ,�{H BR D AMER. 5921 Ilp/HI OI \� w'" NY LIOENSE NSE EXPWES 12/2/]I/04 '( �\5 \ GRAPHIC SCALE 'N ;_, ....�\ \C\SQGL6 \j� 3 113/03 w w m «. IrY'1 �w N .� DATE ( ER eerr 1 I I�h - zoo a xvoln�,,`O* QGV•p Y�q B ORANGEO TY SURVEYYOORRSTMOEFn¢mu OF THE ,;4, vla \N 9 f ,wit Pr a�, DATED WUS L7*DAY OF &62d mwD. t R \g96p4 iyA/roaae i AS Ntt SEMIf MY Umm MIMES 9/50/OS PF muoounS slaw u[BxsP Rx TRE Wnawx WGlmwe¢ Mlru �� saxs x,nv x.m.(IHI.m]5 p0.x as as mmslml "�. ® HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES. Bmel,ro o6rw ao gsrwffs vwraY Bf A GpIWlf9 rAVTm v as sma n+n+nv x»uuuu I R V I N E I N C z+anx.w PUNNING W ENGINEERING W SURVEYING DATE:01/2DN5 DWG By eM mwa marrnxKrws"wrn'm¢ Three H.8hes • lr v , CA 92618 • PH(919)W3.1010 • FX(949)583,0759 REV.:O2/06/00 CK'd By d6 I: MWD—SHEA\Id\565N\EAFCO—OCSO. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MmUng Date To ad.of ir. 4/73103 AGENDA REPORT 1temNumber Rem Number 9(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO PERFORM AND FUND POSITIVE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Agreement with the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans), dated March 11, 2003, providing for Caltrans to pothole District's sewer facilities for positive location at no cost to the District, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • In the past, the Orange County Sanitation District (District) has been responsible for the cost of potholing when requested by the State of California Department of Transportation (Ca(trans) to locate the District's sewer facilities for road construction projects. The District has paid this expense by a reimbursement agreement, since Caltrans has prior rights for all areas along and under their freeways and street right- of-ways. • Caltrans would like to enter into an agreement with the District whereby Caltrans would locate (pothole) existing District sewer facilities for future Caltrans projects. • Caltrans would like to assume responsibility for operation and cost of the positive location of underground utilities on a test basis to facilitate their needs. This agreement will be enforced every year on a test basis until Caltrans states otherwise, and at no cost to the District. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed Agreement is at no cost to the District. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) There is no District expenditure associated with this Agreement. CADocumems and Settings\yope\Local Smftngs\Temporary Internet Flies\OLx3FRItem 9(b).Ceftrans.doc Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES The District will assume the cost of potholing District sewer facilities. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None RLC:jo GintglobaMgenda Draft ReponWoint Boards\CaRransAgreement.doc naw�e: eao�, Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, March 26, 2003 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday. March 26, 2003 at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas Nixon, Counsel Shirley McCracken, Chair Don Hughes Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Ryal Wheeler Jim Ferryman, Chairman, OMTS Committee Jennifer Cabral Brian Donahue, Chairman, PDC Committee Randy Fuhrman Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee Jan Vandersloot Jim Silva, County Supervisor Gerhardt Van Ode Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair STAFF PRESENT: Directors Absent: Blake Anderson, General Manager None Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Gary Streed, Director of Finanoe/Treasurer Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman questioned some of the statements made in the report on the septic system abandonment policy. He mentioned that he accompanied the biosolids audit team during its audit this past week and said that the auditors were impressed with the Districts operations. He also asked about a public letter writing campaign in an effort to seek federal funds for the District's planned secondary treatment facilities. (4) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the February 26, 2003 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 March 26, 2003 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Shirley McCracken reported on the progress of the Legislative Advocacy Ad Hoc Committee that is meeting weekly. The committee is working with staff and consultants on the biosolids bill(AB 1427), ACA 10 (Harman),as well as trying to secure federal funding. Chair McCracken also reported that she extended her stay in Washington, DC to meet with our consultants and the members and staff of the Orange County delegation to seek support for our program. Chair McCracken reported that there the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff will meet on Wednesday, May 7 at 3 p.m. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported on the following issues: A. Progress towards Achievino 30/30 Secondary Treatment Standards Our ocean discharge effluent quality continues to be in the mid-30s ppm for suspended solids and the mid-50s ppm for biochemical oxygen demand. B. Disinfection Update Disinfection is continuing and we are achieving state AB411 standards at the end of the outall. While our numbers are low, there are still elevated readings at the beach, particularly during high tide events when the storm channels are flushed out. C. State Budget Crisis There is nothing new to report. Special Districts are not being discussed as part of the solution to the state budget crisis. Staff will continue to monitor this. D. Proposed Special Board Meeting on April 16, 2003 to discuss the Capital Improvement Program and the schedule for Achieving Secondary Treatment Standards David Ludwin reported that the CIP review has been completed. It is estimated that secondary treatment facilities will be completed by November 2012. The peer review panel will be preparing an independent report on our schedule, which will be given to the Board. A special focus meeting on the CIP schedule is scheduled for April 16 to give the Directors an understanding of how the schedule was developed and what it will mean to the District. The Committee determined that the April 16 meeting will begin at 6 p.m. Mr. Anderson stated that when the language of the bills has been finalized, public support will be sought. E. Orange County Business Council Dinner April 17 Mr. Anderson said that as members of the OCBC there is a table available for this event. The Steering Committee and key staff will be invited to get better acquainted with the business community and seek support for our legislative initiatives. F. Ocean Environment Issues at the April 23 Board Meeting Mr. Anderson announced that there will be a lengthy presentation at the April 23 Board meeting on three issues related to the ocean environment, including a report on the 2001 Huntington Beach Studies, our recent video taping of the ecosystem at the end of the outfall and an overview of the results of last year's ocean monitoring program. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 March 26,2003 G. New Feature at Board Meetings In an effort to help the Board become more familiar with some of the things that staff is involved with, there will be a series of presentations at the Board meetings on 'interesting things that are happening at the District.'These will be presented from time to time. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Counsel Tom Nixon did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS(Items A-D) A. Status of NPDES Permit Renewal and Negotiation Process Dr. Robert Ghirelli updated the Steering Committee on staff activities now that the CIP validation report has been completed and what can be expected in the next few months. When the schedule is approved by the Directors in April, staff will begin negotiations with the regulators on the compliance agreement along with General Counsel as lead. There will be multiple opportunities for public input during the review process. Dr. Ghirelli announced that on April 14 staff members from the Washington delegation will be at the District for a tour and a briefing on our program. Chair McCracken asked when Phase 2 of GWRS would begin and the potential for impacting our program to reach secondary treatment standards. Mr. Ludwin stated that the earliest we could provide water for Phase 2 would be in 2012. And it GW RS Phase 3 was constructed, it would require that water would have to be brought up from Plant 2. It was stated that there is no commitment to Phase 2 or 3 at this time. B. Consider recommending a Policy for properties that abandon septic tanks and connect to sanitary sewers within the District that offsets the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge against the environmental and social benefits to the service area Gary Streed reported on the proposed policy and sought direction from the Committee on whether to move forward with the program. The Committee decided to table the issue because of the many policy and financial issues that need to be more thoroughly evaluated. C. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in April were reviewed. D. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 March 26, 2003 ' (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 23, 2003 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday,April 23,2003 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:10 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c),to discuss one case of anticipated litigation and Section 54957.6 to discuss the General Manager's performance evaluation. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary In the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:55 p.m.,the Committee reconvened In regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. S mitted by: J n appan e ing Committee Secretary G I„R OYYpxpaLSlwNq CammfiwW N1MW9T&6 pN 5C MFwuUrc S 1 MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, April 2, 2003 — 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on April 2, 2003, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OMTS Directors Present: Staff Present: James M. Ferryman, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Don Bankhead Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Carolyn Cavecche Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Debbie Cook Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Tony Kawashima Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering Anna Piercy Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer Tod Ridgeway Carol Beekman, Communications Manager Paul Walker Greg Mathews, Administrative Services Manager Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Doug Stewart Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Nick Arhontes Adrian Renescu OMTS Directors Absent: Mark Esquer Ed Torres OCSD Directors Present: Mike Moore George Robertson Brian Brady Simon Watson Patricia Campbell Bob Bell Alberta Christy Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary John Collins Brian Donahue Others: Michael Duvall Norman Z. Eckenrode Randy Fuhnnan Alice B. Jempsa Jan Vandersloot Beth Krom Gerhard Van Drie Mark Leyes Lynn Norton Patsy Marshall Bill Kennedy Robert McGowan Roger Byrne Roy Moore Bill Tappan (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. I Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 r April 2, 2003 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman spoke regarding the audit recently performed on the District's biosolids management program of which he was a participant. He commended the staff that was involved in the audit. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair welcomed the Directors who were attending the meeting to hear the discussion on the Advanced Asset Management Program. The Directors were reminded that only OMTS Directors would be voting on Items that evening. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, advised staff continues to monitor the state budget crisis but at present, special districts have not yet been impacted. All Directors were invited to attend this Committee Meeting to hear the presentation on asset management. Asset Management is an important objective that will have a long-term impact on the agency. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the March 5, 2003 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. b. OMTS03-14 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. C. OMTS03-15 Receive and file Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance, financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. d. OMTS03-16 Receive and file Information Technology Quarterly Report,which focuses on current performance trends and key technology business applications. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 6(a), (b)and (c)under Consent Calendar. Chair Ferryman announced the following order of agenda items to be discussed and considered: Item 8(a), Item 7(a), and Item 7(b). Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee 1 Page 3 April 2, 2003 (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS03-19 Waste Discharge Requirements and OCSD's current collaborative efforts in Sewer System Management Issues Nick Arhontes and Adriana Renescu provided an overview on the status of the program, reviewing the District's role in the compliance effort and future possibilities where the District could provide leadership and collaboration with the program. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS03-17 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file the following reports in connection with the Summer 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III study: 1) Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III: Coastal Circulation and Transport Patterns: The Likelihood of OCSD's Plume Impacting the Huntington Beach Shoreline Executive Summary, prepared by US Geological Survey, dated March 2003; 2) Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III— Peer Review Panel Summary Report prepared by University of Southern California Sea Grant Program and University of California, Santa Barbara Marine Institute, dated March 2003; and, 3) Receive and file Marine Monitoring Annual Report for 2002 prepared by Orange County Sanitation District. George Robertson, Senior Scientist of the Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division, provided the Directors with an update on the Summer 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation. The principal investigators from the USGS, USC, Naval Post Graduate School, and Scripps Institution of Oceanography concluded that there was no direct observation or association with the District's oulfall and beach contamination at the AB411 levels. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. OMTS03-18 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: 1)Authorize a budget amendment in the amount of$16,555,000 for Advanced Asset Management Improvement Program, Job No. SP-68-2, for development and implementation over a four year period; and 2)Award a sole source consulting services agreement to Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc.for professional consulting and implementation services for Phase 2 and Phase 3, Asset Management Improvement Program, Job No. SP-68, for a two-year period,for an amount Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 f April 2, 2003 not to exceed $7,279,124, with option to renew for an additional two-year period for an amount not to exceed $5,683,479 upon board approval. OCSD staff members Doug Stewart, Bob Dolan, and Dave Ludwin, along with Parsons/GHD consultants Lynn Norton and Roger Byrne, gave a presentation on the proposed advanced asset management program. Directors asked several questions regarding the presentation: why can't staff do this without a consultant;why do this now,why does it take ten years to educate staff; how was the consultant selected; has Parsons done this before;why not solicit competitive bids; what does the District get from this contract; and why so many hours? Directors were assured they would receive reports on a regular basis on the progress of the program. The OMTS Committee requested a presentation be provided at the April 23, 2003 meeting of the Board of Directors and to provide several real examples of cost savings from other agencies. A motion was made and seconded to move staffs recommendation to the April 23, 2003 Board Meeting with no recommendation from the OMITS Committee. The motion failed by a vote of 3 ayes and 5 noes. A substitute motion was moved and seconded to proceed with the Asset Management Program intemally, utilizing existing staff. The motion failed by a vote of 2 ayes and 7 noes. It was then moved and seconded to recommend to the Board of Directors to: 1)Authorize a budget amendment in the amount of$16,555,000 for Advanced Asset Management Improvement Program,Job No. SP-68-2, for development and implementation over a four year period; and 2)Award a sole source consulting services agreement to Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc. for professional consulting and implementation services for Phase 2 and Phase 3, Asset Management Improvement Program, Job No. SP-68,for a two-year period, for an amount not to exceed $7,279,124,with option to renew for an additional two-year period for an amount not to exceed $5.683,479 upon board approval. Motion: Moved, seconded and duty carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. The motion was carried by six aye votes, and three no votes. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology had no report. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 April 2, 2003 (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Director of Operations and Maintenance had no report. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services had no report. (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (14) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for May 7, 2003 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Submi tted by: Penny M.6&1e Operations, Maintenanc and Technical Services Committee Secretary G:\wp.dta\a®enda\OMTS\2003\0403\040203 OMTS minute .dm �ti I OMTS COMMITTEE MeeN Date To etl.o Dir. ,02/03 04/23/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Nbe DMT503-17 1Wum Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: George Robertson, Environmental Compliance and Monitoring SUBJECT: Update of Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III and Environmental Impacts of Disinfection GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file reports in connection with the Summer 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III study: (1) Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III: Coastal Circulation and Transport Patterns: The Likelihood of OCSD's Plume Impacting the Huntington Beach Shoreline Executive Summary, prepared by US Geological Survey, dated March 2003; (2) Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III — Peer Review Panel Summary Report prepared by University of Southern California Sea Grant Program and University of California, Santa Barbara Marine Institute, dated March 2003; and, (3) Receive and file Marine Monitoring Annual Report for 2002 prepared by Orange County Sanitation District. SUMMARY (1) At the April 2, 2003 OMTS Committee meeting, District staff will provide copies of the above reports and an update on the data analysis and reporting for the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III Study and Peer Review; (2) At the April 23, 2003 Board meeting, Dr. Marlene Noble (US Geological Survey) and Dr. Burt Jones (University of Southern California) will present a summary of the findings from the Summer 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III; (3) At the April 23, 2003 Board meeting, District staff will present a summary of the findings from the Summer 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III Peer Review Panel's report; and GR:wh Q: u..end 9enln2Dyope\luel UWIMT.W.I yIn1~Rle.� FMM 121c1.H8aNEIe". wrwa:omm 1�11 (4) A short video will be viewed showing marine life on and near the ouffall. Recent findings on receiving water and beach bacteria before and after disinfection and on fish health will be presented by District staff at the Board meeting. Background • In November 2000, UCI researchers proposed a hypothesis that the District's treated wastewater discharge might be a cause of the summer bacteriological contamination seen along Huntington Beach's shoreline. The District put together a consortium of federal agencies (U.S. Geological Survey, Naval Postgraduate School), universities (University of Southern California, Scripps Institute of Oceanography) and private consulting firms (Science Applications International Corporation, MEC Analytical Systems, Inc.) to conduct a large multi-faceted study off Huntington Beach and Newport Beach during the summer of 2001. Known as the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III, the study was designed to evaluate several mechanisms that could transport the District's treated wastewater from the ouffall to the beach. • In addition, an independent peer review panel comprised of oceanographers and microbiologists was established by the University of Southern California Sea Grant Program and the University of California Marine Science Institute to critique the work of the study team. • This peer review panel met with the principal investigators in April 2002 to review the study results prior to presentations by both groups to the Board on May 15, 2002. The two groups met again in August 2002 and have been in contact since that time, as the principal investigators have further refined their analyses based upon input and comments from the peer review panel. • On April 23, 2003 representatives of the team of principal investigators who conducted the ocean studies will present a summary of their final findings to the Board. • Unfortunately, representatives of the peer review panel are not available on April 23, 2003. District staff will provide a summary of peer review panel conclusions and recommendations. • Since August 2002, the District has been treating its effluent with a strong bleach solution. Since disinfection by-products have the potential to harm marine life, it is important to monitor any changes to marine life that could be associated with this practice. District staff will show an excerpt from recent video surveys of the ouffall focusing on marine life that live on or in close proximity to the ouffall comparing pre- and post disinfection images. • District staff will present findings from recent bacterial monitoring of the ouffall and local beaches and from the 2002 Marine Monitoring Annual Report. L:IWc ""vA BeNyeyapsVMal9Ntl,gelTem%,ary InNmsl FlNeWII(]FEJIem 12(e1HB BNtllestlx AWW:=M(Ml) Page 2 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS (1) Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III: Coastal Circulation and Transport Patterns: The Likelihood of OCSD's Plume Impacting the Huntington Beach Shoreline (2) Peer Review Panel Summary Report (3) Marine Monitoring Annual Report 2002 CD (4) Budget Information Table C:Wcvmeme vN 6eNMcbep\Icrsi SeMrgf\Tomporerylmomq Flln`gLgFEVMm 1EIc�.XB SL]leedu R.Ox Page BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation JOB NO. J-85 - Through December 31, 2002 i ORIGINAL REVISED CURRENT ESTIMATED FUNDS PROPOSED ESTIMATED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED PROJECT THIS EXPENDITURE PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED TOTAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET TO DATE AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION /R TO TO DATE (April 2001) (May 2001) (March DATE 2002) DATE(%) Technical $1,000,000 $1,955,000 $2,770,644 $1,955,000 $2,770,644 $3,078,873 111% Contracts Laboratory $200,000 $200,000 $675,969 $200,000 $525,969 $471,282 90% Supplies& Equipment Labor Costs $210,000 $210,000 $625,000 $210,000 $625,000 $498,710 80% Labor Overhead $210,000 $210,000 $775,D00 $210.000 $775.000 $571,511 74% Source Control $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $549,574 110% Onshore Investigation (Includes all labor, overhead, material, and contract costs PROJECT $1,620,000 $2,575.000 $5.346,613 $2,575,000 $0.00 $5,196,613 $5,169,949 99% TOTAL PROJECT NET $1,620.000 $2,575,000 $5,346,613 $2,575,000 $5,196,613 $5,169.949 99% NOTES 1. Budgeted amounts include report-writing phase(staff and contract costs). 2.These values are not the final casts since not all the invoices have been received. However, these costs should be very close to the final numbers because they are based on the authorized purchase order amounts or the actual amount spent, whichever is greater. GR:wh LNmmnnle.nd In.1 FIl Z'K]M.121c).XB SWEIea. NO.& O3 3(-) 1 OMTS COMMITTEE MeeOng Dale To ad.or Dir. 04/02/03 09/23/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number DMTS03-07 12(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Douglas Stewart, Asset Management Program Manager SUBJECT: BUDGET AND CONTRACT APPROVAL FOR ASSET MANAGEMENT, JOB NO. SP-68-2. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Authorize a budget amendment in the amount of $16,555,000 for Advanced Asset Management Improvement Program, Job No. SP-68-2 , for development and implementation over a 4 year period; and, (2) Award a sole source consulting services agreement to Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc. for professional consulting and implementation services related to Phase 2, Asset Management Improvement Program, Job No. SP-68, for a 2-year period, for a total amount not to exceed $7,279,124, with an option to renew for an additional two-year period for an amount not to exceed$5,683,479 upon Board approval. SUMMARY • Please see attached Frequently Asked Questions for additional information. • On April 24, 2002 the Board of Directors approved a contract with Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc (Parsons) for the purpose of developing a Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis for Asset Management (Strategic Plan). The preparation of this Strategic Plan was intended to be the first phase of a multi-phase project to bring advanced asset management into the business practices of the District. Only Phase I of the work was budgeted and funded by the District and incorporated in the existing contract with Parsons. The Strategic Plan is now complete and was approved by the Board of Directors on December 18, 2002. • The next phase of the project is to develop implementation plans for a series of improvements to the organization's policies, work practices, IT infrastructure, and organization to implement recommendations developed in the Strategic Plan. On December 18, 2002 the Board of Directors also authorized the General Manager to negotiate a contract with Parsons for consulting services to perform this work. District staff is very pleased with the work product delivered by Parsons and their sub consultant, GHD, Ltd., from Melbourne, Australia. Inserting a new consultant in the process at this stage of the work is not considered desirable due to increased costs for bringing a new consultant into an established methodology and the learning curve for a new consultant. Page 1 • On April 2, 2003 the OMTS committee approved the staff recommendation to the r Board of Directors for a two—year contract with Parsons, with an option to renew for an additional two-year period. A presentation by staff will be given at this meeting to address the questions posed by the committee members at the OMTS meeting. • This agenda request is for approval of a consulting contract and the attendant budget since only funds for Phase t of the work have been budgeted to date. The consulting contract has been developed for a 48 month term with a 24 month authorization option. The four year term will take the District to the first major implementation milestone identified in the Strategic Plan. The two year option for the contract is offered to allow the agency to begin the tactical planning and implementation work, execute the early start items outlined in the attached memo, give the Board of Directors an interim check point to review progress on the program, review detailed implementation plans with refined business case justifications, without having to commit to a four year effort. • The Strategic Plan presented a business case for the District to proceed with implementation of advanced asset management practices. The business case showed that an expenditure of between $22,000,000 and $38,000,000 over a ten year period would conservatively save at least $350,000,000 in life cycle asset costs over a 25 year period, save an additional $50,000,000 in reduced capital expenditures, as well as put the District on track to developing a platform for sustainable infrastructure. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table and Contract Cost Summary Tabie. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to attached staff memorandum. ALTERNATIVES The Board could require staff to issue a Request for Proposals for the Phase 2 work on this project. Page 2 i CEQA FINDINGS This action is categorically exempt from CEQA. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Staff memorandum— Frequently Asked Questions Summary 3. Staff Memorandum— Frequently Asked Questions 4. Contract Cost Summary Table Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Strategic Plan for Asset Management SP- 68 I bRIO1NAL dURRENT hROf10SED REbt/PISQd ` FUl1ps �: THIS ' PROPOSED ESTI�ATEDH� P�iOEi:TLCASIF AUTHOpIZEfi PROJEC 'eUbO�,T„- aIIDOET" Y AUTIIORh2�b AUN7RHA11�Ni v 7rATALW, E)I �' 111R `,J� E DE .' a�1MiE'r �,'i BIID�iEi'� INDREASE - .wt. YODAjE .li OUESY�'i� AU7'HdIi1ZAT10N7b bAY �' E u' + t r. l^ '^.,. 9- a ae£td.no .� � �wy Project Development $ - if $ Studies/Permidin $ ''i $ - $ Consultant PSA $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 106,000 $ 456,000 `li $ - $ 466,000 $ 456.000 $ 0% Design Staff $ 341,800 $ 341,800 $ 58,200 $ 400,000 £ $ 341.800 $ 68,200 $ 400.000 $ 40,000 to (t Construction Contract $ $ Construction Administration $ Constnction Inspection $ $ - 31 Contin enc $ 171 000 $ 171.000 a; $ Reimbursable Costs $ - $ ' J TOTAL $ 691,800 $ 691,800 $ 335,200 $ 1,027,000 40 $ 341,800 $ 514,200 $ 856.000 $ 40,000 5% SP-68 Budget from FY 01/02 will be split in FY 02/03. Original FY 01/02 Budget$870,000. SP-68 reduced to 691,800. New SP-68.1 budget$178,200. Budget amendment shown here is included in FY 02/03 budget. nswn.dtetangvoaas%bmga iabie Farm Revlead IV17M ADVANCED ASSET MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RESPONSES TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS The following are responses by staff to questions from various Board Members on advanced asset management. The nature of the questions sometimes creates an overlap in the responses.To the extent possible,we have prepared the responses to be stand alone, and not necessarily dependent upon responses to other questions. 1.WHY CAN'T STAFF DO THE PROPOSED PROGRAM IN HOUSE ? There are three options available for proceeding with the development of the agency's Asset Management improvement program. What if We Do Nothing? ♦ There is certainly a strong economic business case for proceeding. ♦ The Asset Management Strategic Plan identified a minimum savings in 25-year life cycle costs of$350 million and an optimistic estimate of$495 million. ♦ If an advanced asset management program is not undertaken, the identified savings will be foregone. What if We Utilize OCSD Staff Only? ♦ Consultant assistance brings the outside necessary expertise,prior experience, educational assistance,momentum building capacity, and the change catalyst that many large organizations need to affect sweeping change programs. ♦ OCSD would have to find,recruit and then use people with a variety of highly specialized expertise, and would have to coordinate and manage these resources to accomplish a highly complex program without the benefit of previous experience. In the final analysis: The program would take longer, and cost more to do in-house, and would likely not achieve the magnitude of savings that an accelerated consultant-assisted program can achieve. 1 What if We Go Forward with the Proposed Course Using Parsons/GHD? ♦ The third option is the staff recommendation. Staff has negotiated the scope of work with Parsons/GHD to include only the necessary tasks that will ensure the success of the planning and implementation of the effort. 2. WHY DO THIS NOW? There are several reasons for the advanced asset management program to move forward now. These include: ♦ There are significant financial benefits that can be achieved. OCSD's financial modeling for the Strategic Plan indicates 25-year total life cycle cost savings ranging from$350 to$495 million.Asset management practices will be put in place in the next two years to realize at least an estimated$50 million of the expected 25-year life cycle cost savings. ♦ The size, complexity and timing of the District's Capital Improvement Program make this an ideal time to apply advanced asset management practices and processes, and increase the entire CIP program's effectiveness ♦ Staff and management see this as a means of improving organization-wide analysis, evaluation decision-making, and information flow, which will help produce sustained services at the least life cycle cost. ♦ As assets age, the number and complexity of maintenance, renewal and replacement decisions increase. Putting advanced asset management applications,processes, and procedures in place at this time will enhance the quality and capacity of our decision-making. ♦ Advanced asset management software applications are needed for the District to fully apply and benefit from the use of advanced asset management practices. These software applications are needed now to augment and expand current asset management practices,as well as lay the foundation for most all program improvements slated for the first four years of the program. ♦ These software applications will be integrated into the existing information systems, along with replacement or upgrade requirements. 2 3. WHY DOES rf TAKE 10 YEARS TO EDUCATE STAFF? ♦ It will not take 10 years to educate staff regarding advanced asset management. The entire advanced asset management program may take up to 10 years to accomplish, because of the extent of the changes necessary to maximize the benefits of advanced asset management, and the capacity of the organization to accomplish the changes and absorb new management paradigms into the organization. 4. WHY PARSONS/GHD? HOW WAS THIS CONSULTANT SELECTED? ♦ In November 2001, the District issued an RFP for consultant services to a national audience of interested consulting firms. ♦ The scope of work specifically asked for proposals for preparation of a strategic plan based on the body of work in the International Infrastructure Management Manual. . District staff was convinced that this body of knowledge was a major step forward from our existing processes and practices regarding management of assets. ♦ Eight consulting teams from Connecticut to California proposed on the work. Three teams were short-listed for interviews. After careful consideration of the proposals,the interviews, and reference checks, District staff recommended a contract with the Parsons/GHD team to the Board of Directors. ♦ It is the combination of Parsons' world class Information Technology capabilities, Parsons utility management experience,and GHD's world class asset management experience that convinced District staff that this team is best suited to help us make the move to advanced asset management. 5. HAS PARSONS DONE THIS BEFORE? ♦ The Parsons and GHD have formed a formal strategic alliance that involves shared ownership and development of advanced asset management materials and processes, and exclusive teaming arrangements for asset management projects in the United States. 3 ♦ GHD has successfully implemented over 150 advanced asset management programs, including programs for 12 of the top 15 wastewater agencies in Australia and New Zealand. ♦ The Parsons team has several experts from around the country in executive utility management, change management in large organizations, program and project management, and decades of infrastructure management experience with the U.S. model. It is the combination of Parsons' world class IT capabilities, Parsons utility management experience, and GHD's world class asset management experience that convinced District staff that this team is best suited to help us make the move to advanced asset management 6.WHY NOT SOLICIT RFPs ON THE PROPOSED PROGRAM? WHO DETERMINED WHAT IS IN THE SCOPE OF WORK? HOW DO WE KNOW WE ARE GETTING A GOOD PRICE FROM PARSONS? ♦ Based on the results of the work in the Strategic Plan, staff and Parsons/GHD jointly developed the scope of work for the detailed planning and implementation work in Phase 2. Parsons/GHD then developed a detailed cost estimate for the effort, which was subsequently reviewed and negotiated with staff. The scope and cost estimate are now the basis for the contract for the Phase 2 effort. ♦ The hours estimated for the scope of work are based on the project team's experience on implementing similar programs, and are appropriate for the tasks included in the scope of services. ♦ Requesting further proposals for the work anticipated in Phase 2 will not likely result in a reduced cost and would only delay implementation of the work.Parsons/GHD costs are very competitive with other firms ♦ A significant amount of duplication of effort would be involved for a new consultant to get up to speed with the program,and resulting costs to accomplish the scope of services would likely increase due to this. No other fum would have the overall approach of Parsons/GHD,which is embodied in our strategic plan. 7. HOW DO WE CONTROL THE DECISIONS AND COSTS? ♦ It will be the responsibility of OCSD staff to determine the organization's ability and pace with which the program can be implemented.The pace of 4 implementation must match the capacity of the organization to absorb the improvement program. ♦ Specific Asset Management committees consisting of various levels of OCSD management staff will control all aspects of implementation. ♦ Because of this decision and responsibility structure, OCSD will have full control of decisions and costs for Phase 2. 8. HOW WILL KNOWLEDGE BE TRANSFERRED TO THE ORGANIZATION AND BY WHEN? ♦ The three most critical tools to long term success are the Asset Management University, "Example-based mentoring" Skills Teams, and the Knowledge Management System: ♦ Asset Management University. The Asset Management University is intended to make this mastery as painless as possible. The Asset Management University is an organized and structured education center, to be developed within OCSD,whose purpose is to provide a learning center for asset management for the organization ♦ "Example-based Mentoring"Skills Teams.The most effective way to transfer these techniques is to form"skill teams"comprised of individuals in the organization who will be required to apply the techniques to resolve asset management challenges. The process is highly collaborative—Parsons/GHD teaches the techniques through case examples, while the OCSD skills team members adapt the technique to the complex challenges faced uniquely by OCSD. ♦ Knowledge Management System. This system will be browser- based,and must be designed around OCSD work processes. It compliments the agency's Management Information System,but does not replace it. In effect,the knowledge management system is a set of "user manuals"that is browser based(immediately accessible), captures what the agency has learned about its assets and supports core work processes that are developed by the organization. 9. WHY IS THE APPROACH RIGHT?WHAT DO WE GET IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS,BY THE 4 YEAR POINT,AND BY 10 YEARS ? ♦ This approach is right because it was developed collaboratively between the consultant and OCSD staff and management team members, and because it is designed to demonstrate and maximize the benefits to the District. It is also tailored to control the pace of change so the 5 organization's normal business is not disrupted by the implementation of advanced asset management activities. ♦ The First 2-Years o Completed map of asset management program implementation; tasks,budgets, schedules. o Asset Management University and Knowledge Management o The following five"Early Start" Projects are fully defined and underway: • Comprehensive review of the CIP using advanced asset management tools • Needs analysis for Asset Management Information System • Assistance in organizational change management to incorporate advanced asset management processes • Analysis of data needs for advanced Asset Management processes • Completion of OCSD's first ever Total Asset Management Plan o Resource management assistance o Identification and start of tactical plans for completion of the 10- year program o Completed Business Case for the 10-year program ♦ 4-Year Point o The five"Early Start"Projects are implemented,except for • The Asset Management Information System which is in the process of implementation,and • Continued assistance in organizational change management to incorporate advanced asset management processes o Continued Knowledge Management activities o Continued resource planning support o Implementation of tactical plans-generated projects o All improvements required to reach the organizationas 4-year performance target have been implemented as verified by audit ♦ 10-Year Program o Complete implementation of the advanced asset management program • All improvement tasks identified in the Strategic Plan • All Early Stan Projects • All elements of the Knowledge transfer program • All organizational improvements required 6 0 o The organization has successfully achieved its 10-year asset management performance target, and is fully utilizing advanced asset management techniques, practices and processes 10.WHAT ARE SOME REAL, CONCRETE EXAMPLES OF COST SAVING? ♦ Specific examples will be presented by staff at the Board Meeting. 11. WHY SO MANY HOURS? ♦ The Parsons/GHD team and OCSD staff collaboratively developed the scope of work for Phase 2. ♦ Parsons/GHD and OCSD staff collaboratively developed the resources and costs to perform the work. The level of effort, and thus the hours required, is only those necessary to deliver the work. 12. WHY IS THIS APPROACH IMPORTANT TO OCSD? ♦ Staff recognized that better and more effective business decisions will be achieved in the future through refocusing the organization's culture of decision making,from primarily within the individual functional area (departments and their work groups) to an expanded culture that values quality inputs from across the functional areas. ♦ Advanced asset management incorporates the areas of management process and practices,data and knowledge, information systems, decision making tools,people skills and abilities, organizational issues, and asset management reporting into a single focused approach for the organization. 7 v ADVANCED ASSET MANAGEMENT DETAILED RESPONSES TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS The following are responses by staff to questions from various Board Members on advanced asset management.The nature of the questions sometimes creates an overlap in the responses. To the extent possible, we have prepared the responses to be stand alone, and not necessarily dependent upon responses to other questions. 1. WHY CAN'T STAFF DO THE PROPOSED PROGRAM IN HOUSE? There are three options available for proceeding with the development of the agency's Asset Management improvement program. What if We Do Nothing? There is certainly a strong economic business case for proceeding.The first option is to leave the situation status quo and not improve the agency's management practices regarding asset management. The Asset Management Strategic Plan identified a minimum savings in 25-year life cycle costs of$350 million and an optimistic estimate of$495 million, in addition to an estimated$75 million in reduced CIP expenditures,from employing the identified best management practices. These savings are at a program cost(consultant, staff, and other allied costs)of between$29 million and$38 million. If an advanced asset management program is not undertaken, the identified savings will be foregone. What if We Utilize OCSD Staff Only? The second alternative is to have staff develop and deploy the best management practices without the aid of external consultants. While this may save the organization the initial up-front consultant costs for program development,it does place an enormous amount of the program effort on staff that is already tasked with day to day activities. Additional effort required by staff for program development would include implementation, staff augmentation,educational assistance, organizational development assistance, and change management assistance. Consultant assistance brings the outside necessary expertise, prior experience, educational assistance, momentum building capacity, and the change catalyst that many large organizations need to affect sweeping change programs. Important change efforts, like the DART program,have proven that outside consultant assistance is immeasurably invaluable in aiding the organization in reinventing work processes and practices, while maintaining the existing workload. In addition,without expeditious implementation of the identified best management 1 V practices, a major portion of the CEP and life cycle costs savings will be missed, as the District's Engineering Department is on track to committspend several hundred million dollars in the next few years. The level of effort and expertise required for this alternative would greatly exceed the level of effort included in the Parsons/GHD proposed contract because that contract provides access to over 15,000 employees(Parsons 12,500; GHD 3,500) with a variety of skills,qualifications and expertise that can effectively and efficiently accomplish the necessary work. OCSD would have to find,recruit and then use people with a variety of highly specialized expertise,and would have to coordinate and manage these resources to accomplish a highly complex program without the benefit of previous experience.Further,the District would not have access to the processes,procedures and manuals developed by the Parsons/GHD team that serve to shorten the implementation time requirements, and would also not have the benefit of the Parsons/GHD team's experience and lessons learned from others. In the final analysis: The program would take longer, and cost more to do in- house, and would likely not achieve the magnitude of savings that an accelerated consultant-assisted program can achieve. What if We Go Forward with the Proposed Course Using Parsons/GHD? The third option is the staff recommendation. Staff has negotiated the scope of work with Parsons/GHD to include only the necessary tasks that will ensure the success of the planning and implementation of the effort. 2. WHY DO THIS NOW? There are several reasons for the advanced asset management program to move forward now. These include: ♦ There are significant financial benefits that can be achieved. OCSD's Strategic Plan financial modeling indicates 25-year total life cycle cost savings ranging from$350- $495 million. Asset management practices will be put in place in the next two years to realize at least an estimated $50 million of the expected 25-year fife cycle cost savings. As the program becomes more fully developed in the out years, the remainder of the 25-year life cycle cost savings will be realized. Prior to the completion of the first 2-year contract,the fully developed business case for these 25- year life cycle cost savings will be presented to the Board. ♦ The size,complexity and timing of the District's Capital Improvement Program make this an ideal time to apply advanced asset management practices and processes. Application of advanced asset management processes contained within Parson/GHD's Capital Expenditure Evaluation 2 v program will help the District focus and maximize its capital investments, and increase the entire CIP program's effectiveness. This was recently verified through a 15-project pilot study that produced significant beneficial findings and recommendations, which are currently under review and consideration by staff.Early application of this advanced asset management program to the remaining CIP projects is a top priority and will produce significant savings. ♦ Significant interest and momentum currently exists within the organization about applying advanced asset management business practices. Staff and management see this as a means of improving organization-wide analysis, evaluation decision-making, and information flow,which will help produce sustained services at the least life cycle cost. Moving forward now sustains the current enthusiasm and momentum within the organization, and reinforces the staff s desire and commitment to engage best business practices within the organization. ♦ The age and complexity of the District's infrastructure assets suggest that it is time to move from basic to advanced asset management. The District currently owns over 100,000 infrastructure assets. The Capital Improvement Program will increase this number by an estimated 50% over the next 10 years. The collection system assets are mostly 40 to 50 years old, and the treatment plant assets generally fall into the 20-50 year old category.As assets age,the number and complexity of maintenance, renewal and replacement decisions increase. Putting advanced asset management applications,processes, and procedures in place at this time will enhance the quality and capacity of our decision-making. Enhanced decision-making enables the District to ensure that it continues to provide acceptable levels of service at the least overall cost while maintaining acceptable levels of risk. ♦ Advanced asset management software applications are needed for the District to fully apply and benefit from the use of advanced asset management practices. During Phase I realized these software applications are needed now to augment and expand current asset management practices, as well as lay the foundation for most all program improvements slated for the first four years of the program.These software applications will be integrated into the existing information systems, along with replacement or upgrade requirements. This need was identified as a high priority"early start"activity for the Parsons/GHD team,and will involve a comprehensive needs analysis and information systems plan that will guide the District in aligning its information systems with advanced asset management practices. The outcome of this work will assure that the right information is available to the right person at the right time to make the right decisions necessary to sustain its 3 infrastructure at the lowest total life cycle cost,and avoid predictable infrastructure failures. 3. WHY DOES IT TAKE 10 YEARS TO EDUCATE STAM. ♦ It will not take 10 years to educate staff regarding advanced asset management.The process of educating staff began as we developed our Strategic Plan.The entire advanced asset management program may take up to 10 years to accomplish,because of the extent of the changes necessary to maximize the benefits of advanced asset management, and the capacity of the organization to accomplish the changes. It is important to note that a progressive approach to implementing advanced asset management is necessary because it requires time to build the foundation within the organization for many of the advanced techniques.Compare this process to obtaining an advanced college degree,where freshman courses must come first The knowledge transfer aspects of the program will take place during the first four years of the project,and will involve a combination of formal class room training and extensive"side-by-side" menmring activities performing actual asset management work.The application of sophisticated asset management techniques depends upon this early knowledge transfer.Once this knowledge transfer program is in motion,the District will be able to progressively apply more and more advanced asset management techniques. ♦ As part of the project,the Parsons/GHD team will provide a full series of their advanced asset management training manuals to the District that will be tailored to meet the District's specific needs. The Parsons/GHD scope of services was designed to assure maximum knowledge transfer,so that the advanced asset management practices become the District's,thus consultant assistance with asset management progressively diminishes over time. 4. WHY PARSONS/GHD?HOW WAS THIS CONSULTANT SELECTED? In November 2001,the District issued an RFP for consultant services to a national audience of interested consulting firms. The scope of work specifically asked for proposals for preparation of a strategic plan based on the body of work in the International Infrastructure Management Manual (EMM).This manual was developed by the New Zealand National Asset Management Steering(HAMS) Group in association with the Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia (IPWEA). GHD were the principal consultants to the committees for all three manuals including this one through their joint venture Worley—GHD.This was an industry led initiative and received strong endorsement from both the New Zealand and Australian governments. District staff was convinced that this body of knowledge was a major step forward from our existing processes and practices regarding management of assets. 4 P Eight consulting teams from Connecticut to California proposed on the work. Three teams were short-listed for interviews. Two of the teams included partners from Australia or New Zealand which had direct relevant experience with the AUS/NZ approach.After careful consideration of the proposals,the interviews, and reference checks,District staff recommended a contract with the Parsons/GHD team to the Board of Directors. Parsons/GHD was selected in part because they were the only team that demonstrated the understanding of the long-range strategic planning effort that the District staff was looking for. Staff knew that only a whole-agency approach to asset management would in the long run be effective and that the strategic planning element of bringing asset management into the organization was vital to educating the organization and obtaining the buy off and commitment for the effort to proceed. The AUS/NZ approach to asset management is so different from existing U.S. practices,that staff was convinced that only a collaborative, educational approach to increasing asset management knowledge throughout the organization would be successful. Parsons/GHD was also selected based on the people,knowledge, skills, and abilities that the team was offering. Roger Byrne, and his team at GHD, have been one of the primary authors,contributors, and implementers of advanced asset management in Australia and New Zealand and internationally for decades. Roger is a principal author of the 1TMM. GHD's gap analysis tool,including the value chain model,is exclusively available to Parsons—GHD This approach was used to assess and develop the program necessary for the District to move to best appropriate advanced asset management practices is not available from anyone else in the world. GHD developed the tools over fifteen years of implementing advanced asset management practices in over 150 businesses, including twelve of the top IS Australian water/wastewater businesses. The Parsons team has several experts from around the country in executive utility management, change management in large organizations,program and project management, and decades of infrastructure management experience with the U.S. model. It is the combination of Parsons' world class IT capabilities, Parsons utility management experience, and GHD's world class asset management experience that convinced District staff that this team is best suited to help us make the move to advanced asset management. Information on the Parsons/GHDs' principal team members follow: ♦ Roger Byme was the leader of the 50-person asset management division of GHD in Australia, and has been actively engaged in developing advanced asset management in Australia and New Zealand for over 25 5 O years. He has led the implementation of advanced asset management for over 150 clients,including 12 of the top 15 water/wastewater agencies in Australia and New Zealand. He has been a principal author of all three asset Management manuals including the most recent International Infrastructure Management Manual for Australia and New Zealand, and is recognized as an expert and leader in advanced asset management world- wide. He is relocating to the United States to work exclusively with Parsons, and to function as technical director on Phase 2 of our asset management project. ♦ Duncan Rose has extensive government financial management,business practices and information systems expertise. He is a former City/County Manager with over 15 years of consulting experience, and serves as Technical Director for Parsons National Asset Management Center. Duncan has a Masters Degrees in business and governmental planning. ♦ Lynn Norton is a former wastewater utility director who personally developed and led numerous successful change initiatives as both a public sector director and as a consultant specializing in competitiveness,change management, strategic planning,capital program planning, and asset management and business practices optimization. He has over 28 years experience,including managing the wastewater program for the 8th largest city in the US,has a dual Masters Degree in Public Administration and Management,and also possesses the highest levels of certification in California for wastewater treatment operations and collection system maintenance. Lynn has extensive practical asset management experience, and has received national professional association awards in recognition of his accomplishments. ♦ Bill Kennedy has 30 years of extensive project and program management experience for major water and wastewater agencies. He served as a Deputy Program Manager with the City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department for nine years and helped manage their$2.4 billion dollar Clean Water program. Bill has a Masters in Civil Engineering,a Certificate of Financial Management and has extensive senior level consulting and project management experience for major wastewater utilities. S. HAS PARSONS DONE THIS BEFORE? There is currently no US-based consultant that has fully implemented a whole- agency advanced asset management program. The Parsons and GHD have formed a formal strategic alliance that involves shared ownership and development of advanced asset management materials and processes, and exclusive teaming arrangements for asset management projects in 6 P the United States. For all intent and purposes, Parsons/GHD functions as one entity for asset management projects. We understand that Parsons and GHD entered into this relationship because of the relative strengths of each company. Parsons wanted GHD's advanced asset management tools and experience, and GHD wanted Parsons as a partner in the US because of its strong technical expertise in planning, business practices,information systems,engineering, program management, construction management,change management,and public sector optimization and competitiveness experience. Parsons itself has over 12,500 employees world-wide,and GHD has over 3,500. Together they have extensive capabilities and considerable experience in all aspects of advanced asset management. Several of the key individuals assigned to our project have extensive asset management experience as well as extensive change management and public sector management and administration expertise.The combination of these skills proved effective during the strategic planning phase, and the same core team of individuals will be working on Phase 2 of the project. During Phase 2,these key individuals will be augmented by other technical resources needed to successfully complete the project. These resource people will come from both Parsons and GHD. GHD has successfully implemented over 150 advanced asset management programs,including programs for 12 of the top 15 wastewater agencies in Australia and New Zealand. The Parsons team also has extensive experience within the US implementing change initiatives,and in optimizing asset creation programs. 6. WHY NOT SOLICIT RFPs ON THE PROPOSED PROGRAM? WHO DETERMINED WHAT IS IN THE SCOPE OF WORK? HOW DO WE KNOW WE ARE GETTING A GOOD PRICE FROM PARSONS? The Strategic Plan was completed in November 2002 and adopted by the Board in December 2002. Based on the results of the work in the Strategic Plan, staff and Parsons/GHD jointly developed the scope of work for the detailed planning and implementation work in Phase 2. Parsons/GHD then developed a detailed cost estimate for the effort, which was subsequently reviewed and negotiated with staff.The scope and cost estimate are now the basis for the contract for the Phase 2 effort. The single advantage to developing and requesting further proposals would be to have a different consultant provide that scope of work for less money. The average labor rate used by Parsons/GHD in the cost estimate for Phase 2 is$165 per hour. These hourly rates are in line with industry standards for this same type work. Staff understands that Parsons regularly performs salary surveys to assure that the salary ranges of their various classifications of people are competitive, and are in alignment with the rest of the industry. 7 e The scope of work for Phase 2 describes the work that the District now wants to undertake to implement the asset management program.The consultant selection process for Phase 1 anticipated the need for Phase 2 work, although it did not contract for that work.It was anticipated that the District wanted a single consultant team that could assist the District in all phases of the work for the sake of continuity. The hours estimated for the scope of work are based on the project team's experience on implementing similar programs,and are appropriate for the tasks included in the scope of services. Some elements of the scope are not fully defined,and these elements of work will be authorized on a task order basis, which will include specific hour budgets and advanced approval by staff. Other elements are already fully understood, and have complete hour estimates that have been developed by the consultant and reviewed by staff. The work plans and progress of work will be carefully monitored throughout the project to assure that the work is accomplished in an efficient and high quality manner. The proposed contract will limit payment to the consultant to hours actually worked on the project. There are only a select few consultants in the U.S. today offering asset management services. All of them participated in the selection process for the Strategic Planning contract. Requesting further proposals for the work anticipated in Phase 2 will not likely result in a reduced cost and would only delay implementation of the work. In addition,a second consultant would likely not have the same commitment and knowledge base to the approach outlined in the Phase l Strategic Plan,resulting in lesser quality effort and marginalized results. Some duplication of effort would be involved for a new consultant to get up to speed with the program,and resulting costs to accomplish the scope of services would likely increase due to this. 7. HOW DO WE CONTROL THE DECISIONS AND COSTS? The focus of Phase 2 is to build the capacity of the organization to perform advanced asset management to the level established by staff during preparation of the Strategic Plan. That plan identified 274 Asset Management improvement tasks for implementation over a 10-year timeframe. Development of specific recommendations on the organization, scope and tinting of these tasks will be accomplished by Parsons/GHD in collaboration with staff in Phase 2. It will be the responsibility of OCSD staff to determine the organization's ability and pace with which the program can be implemented.The pace of implementation must match the capacity of the organization to absorb the improvement program. Specific Asset Management committees consisting of various levels of OCSD management staff will control all aspects of implementation. Because of this decision and responsibility structure, a considerable portion of the contract is task order driven where OCSD must authorize task order work before it proceeds 8 u through implementation. This structure assures that OCSD will have full control of decisions and costs for Phase 2. 8. HOW WELL KNOWLEDGE BE TRANSFERRED TO THE ORGANIZATION AND BY WHEN? Effectively transitioning OCSD's current management culture to a more asset- centric culture lies in changing: ♦ How the organization"thinks", and ♦ How the organization works (its work processes). Both are dependent upon the effective transfer of advanced asset management knowledge from the consultant team to the OCSD organization,the resident experts on the agency's assets.Effective transfer of advanced asset management (AAM)knowledge can be reduced to 6 core steps. These steps are summarized in the following table: Steps Core Concepts Core Tools 1. Frame the AAM The AAM Challenge AAM Charter Core Concepts Core Questions AAM Business Case (Paradigm) The AAM Paradigm he AAM Payoff . Collect"Best AAM `Best Practices" AAM Practice Manuals Practices" . Organize "Best The AAM Value Chain AAM Value Chain Practices" . Select"Best Gap Analysis Gap Analysis ppropriate actices" (BAP) . Transfer/Deploy Mentoring Teams AAM Manuals AP AAM University Example-based Mentoring/Skills Teams . Sustain BAP rnowledge Management Knowledge Management System While each tool identified in the table above is important in executing the defined steps, the three most critical tools to long term success are the Asset Management University, "Example-based mentoring"Skills Teams, and the Knowledge Management System. These tools are summarized as follows: 9 v Asset Management University Persons/GHD has identified nearly 180"world's best practices"in asset management. Mastering all aspects of these best practices requires an investment in time and energy on the part of OCSD's employees. The Asset Management University is intended to make this mastery as painless as possible. The Asset Management University is an organized and structured education center,to be developed within OCSD,whose purpose is to provide a learning center for asset management for the organization. It is expected to feature on-line course materials, a structured approach to mastery of those materials including class room training, a reference library and an electronic bulletin board to exchange and develop ideas or gain assistance. It is expected to sponsor periodic seminars and topic specific "brown bag"lunches. Key to the University is collaborative, example-based skills mentoring and the knowledge management system. "Example-based Mentoring"Skills Teams Advanced Asset Management is built around certain fundamental management concepts and techniques—level of service definition,integrated data structure, failure mode and criticality analysis,risk—consequence assessment, optimized renewal decision-making, to name but a few. These techniques have been highly refined as world's best practices and specifically fitted to the wastewater environment. The most effective way to transfer these techniques is to form"skill teams" comprised of individuals in the organization who will be required to apply the techniques to resolve asset management challenges.These skills teams are mentored by consultant experts in a "hands-on"process using real case studies from within the organization.The process is highly collaborative—Parsons/GHD teaches the techniques through case examples,while the OCSD skills team members adapt the technique to the complex challenges faced uniquely by OCSD. Together,revisions to current work processes that emerge are subsequently tested by the skills teams, and the requisite skills/roles/changed processes introduced throughout the organization. Knowledge Management System Knowledge management systems look beyond traditional data and information management. Knowledge management systems recognize that an effective management structure must build on the cumulative knowledge of its employees, not just bits of data.This knowledge includes the "how"and"why" as much as the"what".This knowledge must be so framed as to fit OCSD's unique work processes and must be readily retrievable to the field employee and senior manager alike in an intuitively usable manner. 10 I While skill building is driven by collaborative,example-based mentoring in skills teams,the learning achieved through such mentoring is sustained and reinforced through OCSD's knowledge management system. This system will be browser based, and must be designed around OCSD work processes. It compliments the agency's Management Information System, but does not replace it. In effect,the knowledge management system is a set of"user manuals"that is browser based (immediately accessible), captures what the agency has learned about its assets and supports core work processes that are developed by the organization. 9. WHY IS THE APPROACH RIGHT? WHAT DO WE GET IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS,BY THE 4 YEAR POINT,AND BY 10 YEARS? This approach is right because it was developed collaboratively between the consultant and OCSD staff and management team members, and because it is designed to demonstrate and maximize the benefits to the District. It is also tailored to control the pace of change so the organization's normal business is not disrupted by the implementation of advanced asset management activities. Relying on consultant support for the initial four years of the program provides the level of effort,experience,tools and expertise necessary to successfully apply and incorporate appropriate advanced asset management into the organization. This approach will achieve the projected savings, enhance our infrastructure serviceability,and improve our business practices. The First 2-Years ♦ Completed map of asset management program implementation;tasks, budgets, schedules. ♦ Asset Management University and Knowledge Management ♦ The following five"Early Start"Projects would be fully defined and underway: 1) Comprehensive review of the CIP using advanced asset management tools. 2) Needs analysis for Asset Management Information System 3) Assistance in organizational change management to incorporate advanced asset management processes 4) Analysis of data needs for advanced asset management practices 5) Completion of first ever Total Asset Management Plan ♦ Resource management assistance ♦ Identification and start of tactical plans for completion of the 10-year program ♦ Completed Business Case for the 10-years 4-Year Point ♦ The following five"Early Start"Projects would be fully defined and underway: 11 o Comprehensive review of the CIP is completed ' o Implementation assistance for Asset Management Information System o Continued assistance in organizational change management to incorporate advanced asset management processes ♦ Continued Knowledge Management activities ♦ Continued resource planning support ♦ Implementation of tactical plans-generated projects ♦ All improvements required to reach the organizationas 4-year performance target have been implemented as verified by audit 10-Year Program ♦ Complete implementation of the advanced asset management program o All improvement tasks identified in the Strategic Plan o All Early Start Projects o All elements of the Knowledge transfer program o All organizational improvements required ♦ The organization would have successfully achieved its 10-year asset management performance target,and would be fully utilizing advanced asset management techniques, practices and processes 10.WHAT ARE SOME REAL,CONCRETE EXAMPLES OF COST SAVING? The following chart shows asset management results reported by the top 15 water/wastewater agencies in Australia: 40 40%Maximum 35 a 30 22.6%Average w 25 c 20 m 15 15%Minimum V I 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1985 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Specific examples will be presented by staff at the Board Meeting. 12 11. WHY SO MANY HOURS? The Parsons/GHD team and OCSD staff collaboratively developed the scope of work for Phase 2 over a period of two months.In doing so the scope was presented to OCSD's Asset Management Committee and EMT for comment and input. Subsequently, Parsons/GHD and OCSD staff collaboratively developed the resources and costs to perform the work. The scope of work contains the work items necessary to implement the advanced asset management program.The level of effort,and thus the hours required is only those necessary to deliver the work. 12.WHY IS THIS APPROACH R14PORTANT TO OCSD? OCSD,like all major wastewater utilities in the U.S,is organized and operates around the functional area disciplines needed to perform the organization's work. Typical organizational structures revolve around departments consisting of engineering,financial management, operations,maintenance,information systems,administration, and other areas. The focus of a person's work life, and in fact how they come to view their contribution to the organization,becomes a reflection of their department's work environment and functional area objectives.The measurement of a person's contribution to the organization and subsequent career growth potential are gauged primarily against how well that person's work output aligns with these specific departmental objectives. It is unusual for a person to have his work objectives aligned with the organization's overall objectives for level of service to its customers and stakeholders. Management staff at OCSD has recognized for several years that this culture tends to breed a narrow focus on the particular technical aspects of a person's work unit.The organization has come to realize that several asset failures and near failures are in part a result of work objectives that focus on functional area objectives.It was recognized that better and more effective business decisions will be achieved in the future through refocusing the organization's culture of decision making, from primarily within the individual functional area(departments and their work groups)to an expanded culture that requires integration across the functional areas. How do all of the separate technical disciplines or"silos"within the organization combine their separate functions,knowledge, and expertise to jointly make the best decisions at the right time to ensure the least overall agency costs for the life of the asset?Additionally,how will the organization ensure the longest useful life of the assets while the assets continue to deliver acceptable customer service? A changed focus,use of more integrated processes,a different set of tools,and a more"life cycle-oriented"management paradigm (the way we think)is needed. We found this management paradigm expressed in the International Infrastructure Management Manual, and also found this paradigm being practiced as everyday practices in several water/wastewater businesses and as well as a community 13 practice,in Australia and New Zealand. This management paradigm is the process we are calling advanced asset management. Advanced asset management incorporates the areas of management process and practices,data and knowledge,information systems,decision making tools, people skills and abilities,organizational issues, and asset management reporting into a single focused approach for the organization. The focus is on how the organization will make the best set of decisions at the right time for the asset. The importance of this new management paradigm to the OCSD staff is found in the willingness of the staff to evaluate our current asset-related management processes and practices to examination against a compendium of world's best practices,document the resulting gap,and then propose an improvement program to our Board so that we could close that gap. OCSD is currently recognized by our peers in the industry as one of the best run organizations in the industry. Advanced asset management practices will move the organization to an even better position of managing our infrastructure responsibilities. Staff understands that we can further realize significant long-term benefits for our member agencies by incorporating advanced asset management. The expected results of these changed management practices have been outlined in the earlier questions. 14 4/1 512 0 0 3 Advanced Asset Management Consultant Cost Proposal Ref Com onent Description Yr 1-2 Cost Yr 3-4 Cost Total Cost Total Hours 1 WC1 Project Management $ 379,035 $ 429,050 $ 808,085 2 WC1 Administration 662,953 734,566 1,397,519 3 WC1 Subtotal $ 1,041,988 $ 1,163,616 $ 2,205,604 17,404 4 WC2 Program Mgt, Knowledge Transfer $ 532,617 $ 821,768 $ 1,354,385 7,108 5 WC3 Tactical Work Plan Development $ 365,207 $ 251,357 $ 616,564 6 WC3 Quality Element Framework Plans 7 WC3 OEF1- Practices& Procedures $ 53,555 $ - $ 53,555 8 WC3 QEF2- Information Systems 62,312 0 62,312 9 WC3 QEF3-Data&Knowledge 62,312 0 62.312 10 WC3 QEF4-Commercial Tactics 30,328 0 30.328 11 WC3 QEF5-Organizational Issues 58,360 0 58,360 12 WC3 QEF6- People Issues 108,818 0 108,818 13 WC3 QEF7-Total Asset Mgt Plan 69,573 0 69,573 14 WC3 Subtotal $ 445,258 $ - $ 445,258 15 WC3 Tactical Work Plan Group 1-Early Start Items 16 WC3 ES1-Capital Expenditure Evaluaf*n $ 318.759 $ 132,028 $ 450,787 17 WC3 ES2-Data Standards 134,239 0 134,239 18 W03 ES3- Information Systems Integration 1,224,527 1,651,367 2,875,894 19 WC3 ES4-Organization 193,514 237,154 430,668 20 WC3 ES5-Initial Total Asset Mgt Plan 160,036 0 160,036 21 WC3 Subtotal $ 2,031,075 $ 2,020,549 $ 4,051,624 22 WC3 Total for WC3 (Line 5+14+21 ) $ 2,841,540 $ 2,271,906 $ 5,113,446 28,712 23 WC4 Resource Management 24 WC4 Planning $ 338,772 $ 278,270 $ 617,042 25 WC4 Supplemental Staff Augmentation 1,361,688 0 1,361,688 26 WC4 Subtotal $ 1,700,460 $ 278,270 $ 1,978,730 15,116 27 WC5 Implementation $ 1,162,518 $ 1,147,917 $ 2,310,435 10,192 28 Total Proposal $ 7,279,123 $ 5,683,477 $ 12,962,600 78,532 CADocumems and eedingstpope\Local satlings\Temporary Imemet Fles\OLOMItem 12(d).4 P l DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Brian Donahue, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Alice Jempsa, Vice Chair Bob Oaten, Director of Operations & Patty Campbell Maintenance John Collins John Linder, Construction Manager Norm Eckenrode Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor Beth Krom Jim Herberg, Interim Engineering Manager Patsy Marshall Matt Smith, Acting Engineering Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Mark Esquer, O&M Engineering Manager Bob McGowan Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Randy Fuhrman (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman stated that for every$1 million in the budget it will cost the tax payer an additional $1 in fees. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Brian Donahue did not make a report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson did not make a report. v PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 April3, 2003 (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin did not make a report. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (8) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-m) a. RECEIVE, FILE, AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the March 6, 2003 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached is the Monthly and Quarterly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an Information only Item. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There are five change orders this month for PDC Committee approval. C. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Attached is the PSA and Addenda Report. This is an information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There were no PSAs and no Addenda approved by the General Manager from February 21 through March 20,2003. d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only item. f. CIP VALIDATION AND PRIORITIZATION STATUS REPORT Attached is the CIP Validation and Prioritization Status Report. This is an information only item. g. QUARTERLY CONTRACT STAFFING ASSIGNMENTS REPORT Attached is the Quarterly Contracts Staffing Assignments Report. This is an information only item. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 April 3, 2003 h. QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT Attached is the Quarterly Groundwater Replenishment System Status Report. This is an information only item. I. PDC03-15 Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, with Steve P. Rados, Inc., authorizing an addition of$150.000, increasing the total contract amount to$30,153,210. This Change Order is for PDC approval per delegated authority by Resolution No. OCSD 99-23. j PDC03-16 Ratify Change Order No.3 to Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-60, with JW Contracting Corporation, authorizing an addition of$199,346, increasing the total contract amount to $10,692.025. This Change Order is for PDC approval per delegated authority by Resolution No. OCSD 99-23. k. PDC03-17 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 3 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No.J-33-1 A, with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of$126,720, increasing the total contract amount to$6,688,181. I. PDC03-18 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 6 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$54,992 and a time extension of 21 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $70,934,528. M. PDC03-19 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 1 to Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62, with Ark Construction Co., authorizing an addition of$60,399 and a time extension of 396 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$430,399. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 8(a)through (m) under Consent Calendar. (9) ACTION ITEM (Item a) a. PDC03-20 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve plans and specifications for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Q, Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation- Units D through Q, Job No. SP-73, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4) Award a construction contract to PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 April 3,2003 J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Q, Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation- Units D through Q, Job No. SP-73,for an amount not to exceed $1,485,239. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve plans and specifications for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Q, Job No. P2-85,and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation- Units D through Q, Job No. SP-73, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a construction contract to J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Q, Job No. P2-85,and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation- Units D through Q, Job No. SP-73, for an amount not to exceed $1,485,239. (10) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (11) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEE71NG There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (14) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 1, 2003 at 5 p.m. (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m. 1 PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 April 3, 2003 Submitted by. J J Tappan D Committee Secretary c:�.m.MaugenMTDo 00xmnes OW3 PDC Dren MinA= NC r PDC COMMITTEE Mn,eetl Date ro ad.or Din 413103 4123103 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCA3-17 Item 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Ed Triggs, Engineer SUBJECT: STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-33-lA GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1A, with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of $126,720, increasing the total contract amount to$6,688,181. SUMMARY Background • Job No. J-33-1A, Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, includes work to reconfigure existing electrical systems for increased capacity and reliability, and to replace or modify selected electrical equipment due to advanced age or unsuitability to withstand the existing electrical system short circuit capability. • Spec Services prepared the plans and specifications and the Construction Contract was awarded to Southern Contracting Company on April 28, 2001. • Change Order No. 3 includes nineteen (19) items of added work to Job No. J-33-1 A. There are four omissions associated with this Change Order. There is no time extension associated with this Change Order. The Contract includes liquidated damages of $1,000 per day and no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date July 5, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date July 5, 2003 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 2 Current Contract Completion Date July 5, 2003 Revised Completion Date July 5, 2003 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 Change Order No. 1 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Changes to Electrical Schematics $ 17,750 0 Design Change 2 Addition of Motor Starters to Plant No. 16,470 0 Changed 2 MCC-RC Conditions 3 Power Building No. B Cable Bus 21,115 0 Design Change Changes 4 Grounding of Cable Tray 925 0 Design Change 5 1 Remote I /O at MCC-RSS 3,260 1 0 !Design si n Chan e 6 Conduit Routingin Power BuildingA 7,105 0 si n Chan e 7 Structural Modifications at Gas 1,395 0 ission Compressor MCC "CGA" Buildin 8 Demolition of SCADA Terminal 565 0 Change Cabinet at H & I Scrubber Block House 9 Demolition of Housekeeping Pad at H 1,095 0 Changed & I Scrubber Block House I Conditions 10 1 125VDC Power Supply for SWGR-RC 5,005 0 Omission 11 MCC-TWF Ground 2,140 0 Changed Conditions 12 Change the Communications Options 12,660 0 Design Change on Power Meters/ Monitors 13 Structural Modifications at Power 950 0 Design Change Building No. 1 14 Local Ready Pilot Light—At E-340 1,300 0 Omission 15 MCC-Q Miscellaneous Controls 855 0 1 Desi n Chan e 16 12kV Service Center ATS and Panel 2,950 0 1 Design Change 17 1 Blower Building Basement 4,460 0 1 Design Change 18 Plant No. 1 MCC-MC Feeder 5,170 0 Design Change /Omission 19 Lighting Panel "MD" 1,695 0 Changed Conditions 20 Storage of Electrical Equipment 19,855 0 Changed Conditions TOTAL—CHANGE ORDER NO.3 $126,720 0 Additional information can be found in the attached Change Order Job Completion • The project is 67.7% complete. R"W: I W4= Page 2 4r PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $6,329,000 Previously Authorized Changes $ 232,461 This Change (add) $ 126,720 Change Orders to Date $ 359,181 Percentage Increase to Date 5.68% Amended Contract Price $ 6,688,181 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, page 93, CIP,J-33-1A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS This project was included in the previously approved programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The Master Plan was prepared by Carollo Engineers-Boyle Engineering, Joint Venture. Jones & Stokes prepared the EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989. The Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order ET:dm GAep.dWagende\Boerd Agenda Repods\E003 Board Agenda Reporle\0403\03-17-J-33-IA-040303.doo Rain: raara Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO.J-33-SA OPIGINLL CURPENT FPOPOSEO PROPOBE9 FUNDS THIS PnOFOSEO ESINIATED ESTIMRTED PROJESTN0.K AURIONUNUO PROJECT RUDOET REVISED AUTNO.OTO AUTNORRATgN TOTP E.IPE .U. IXPENOEO .U.. DUOG. JNURSPSE RUGOET DRTE NEWEST RUTII..UNON TODATE TO DPTEIXI Oneb meM 5 W'J 5 <SSW] S l. S o55 W0 E <SS W] E <A.G'II 1W'„ SbEiavPomllN $ N7.W3 5 3)A,W3 5 Ta.OW 5 3>I WO 5 3)<W3 S JR)59 10]% WmuSenl P$A 5 27t .993 E 2.720993 5 2. $ 2)2J99] 5 2]NBi3 5 2.UBS13 WX Cef n$IW 5 .1101 .1 Ni a 5 .1W7 S tl1.W) 0.15 )B 91% Cars bn ConVetl 5 9223506 S 9.SSSd f I.120 S 9.892W) 9 9S58.%7 S I28 T20 9692.841 $ )DSS1S8 >M Core4vtian PpmN¢ J19 NJ a el][tll a bl].WJ S BC3 WJ N3.WJ 59t "NI: CarsNtlgn s So9 WD see WD a 959.WR 5 959 WD s sm.DDD s au an Conti f 5]1 J91 5 W9G9 5 IX)21 E )12313 5 PR0.IECTTOTY S 19856 W2 $162]]0.N b 516 YJ)W3 5 15,3W,%) 5 I28.T20 f 15520.84) f 119W$85 )P{ R.-... .. PRDJECTNET 5 1B,8%,CW 5182])OT g - 515231W3 $ 15,39],%/ f 128,. a 15.520.891 f 11&55W h9e Na.:IneWM1'an b I.1.1A.........tl,Ne ConSlructim CONretl ertquMeWw IMUWaf1 S81.9011w IMJ]Y1 wnaluYmwM9q eMf1.J32,8U5bqugww Nup�gnwnl lnyalkJaa paA ollMJJ]I roM. 0 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT - STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB/CONTRACT NO.J-33-IA APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME �M DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 425/1001 96,329,000 T6,329,00D 730 730 CO NO.1' 6R2002 1151,p81 $6,460,081 2.39% 0 730 CONO.2" 7/3/2003 66I Salt $6.561,401 3.67% 0 730 '09 ... 9i6 rT �3 8126;'0 L ,y 8988�781 - smw, 0 736^ Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 "Approved by General Manager per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 u Page 1 of 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contractino Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1 A Consultant: Spec Services Amount of this Change Order(Add) $ 126,720.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes In the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —CHANGES TO ELECTRICAL SCHEMATICS This item is for the changes required to be made to the Electrical Schematic Diagrams in accordance with new District Drawing Standards. Addendum No. 3 to the Project Bid Documents added schematic drawing standards not originally in the package. This addition of standard drawings changed the requirements of the control schemes in all cases. The changes Included addition of terminals, schematic drawing additions and switch changes. This Item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00017 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 001 dated July 24,2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 17,750.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—ADDITION OF MOTORS STARTERS TO PLANT NO. 2 MCC-RC This Item is for the addition of motor starters to new 480V Motor Control Center MCC-RC for new loads of two- 10 horsepower and one- 3/4 horsepower motors. These loads were added on project P2.60, after this project(J-33-1 A) design was complete. The additional work Includes all connections of these loads and "as-built"drawings for final documentation. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00009 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 011 dated April 4, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,470.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 12 u ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southem Contracting Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April23. 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1A Consultant: Spec Services ITEM 3—POWER BUILDING NO. 2 CABLE BUS CHANGES This item is for changes required to replace existing cable bus with conduit and wire at Plant No. 2 Power Building B. Original construction bid drawings for Project No. P2-47-1 indicated the bus dud feeder from transformer TFR-BB to Switchgear SWGR-SL was metal enclosed bus dud. This was changed to metal enclosed cable bus during this project's construction. As-Built drawings were not available showing this change during the J-33-IA project design. When this was identified by RFI No. 00015, the District Operation and Maintenance Department preference was to replace the cable bus feeder to cable and conduit instead of extending it. This choice was also the more cost effective solution to this problem. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00018 and Southern Contracting Companys Letter SCC COR No.005 dated May 28, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $21,115.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4— DUCTBANK GROUNDING AT PLANT NO. 2 KENNISON TUNNEL This item is for changes required to install ductbank grounding at Plant No. 2 Kennison Tunnel. Original construction bid drawings indicated a new ductbank was to be grounded at the existing cable tray at the ductbank entry into the tunnel. An altemate method of grounding,which included a new ground bus bar and bonding to the 12.47kV circuit ground conductors, was selected to improve the integrity of the ground system. During construction R was found that the cable tray(used for low voltage systems)would not provide a proper ground system for the 12.47 kV circuit feeders and should not be used as a main equipment ground for 12.47 kV circuits. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference Districts Field Change Order No. 00021 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No.006 dated July 29,2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $925.D0 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days o Page 3 of 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contractina Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 23. 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements-J-33-1A Consultant: Spec Services ITEM 5-REMOTE VO WIRING TO MCC-RSS This Rem is for changes required to install remote I/O wiring into conduit between MCC-RS and MCC-RSS at Plant No.2 Power Building C. Original construction bid drawings indicated conduit only from MCC-RSS to MCC-RS. The subject I/O wiring was shown to be installed in the future by others. The District Engineering Department requested the addition of this wiring,wire terminations,wire tagging and testing to the project due to the ease of installation at this time and future cost savings. This wiring is to accommodate approximately 25 PLC 110 points. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No.00020 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No.010 dated July 1,2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,260.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6- CONDUIT ROUTING IN POWER BUILDING A This Rem is for additions required for the re-routing of three-4 inch conduits and cable,the addition of a pull box, along with associated supports to allow future access to equipment in the room through an existing ceiling access panel. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00007 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 017 dated February 8, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,105.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1A Consultant: Spec Services ITEM 7—STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS AT GAS COMPRESSOR MCC"GCA" BUILDING This item is for modification of existing roof I-beam and roof ledger at the Plant 2 Gas Compressor MCC °GCA" Building. The modifications were needed to resolve interferences with the roll-up door dimensions which were identified when the door drawing submittal package was received. The changes included costs required for the removal and relocation of the existing roof beam and beam supports. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 64 of the General Provisions. Reference Districts Field Change Order No. 00010 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 022 dated April 12, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,395.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8—DEMOLITION OF SCADA TERMINAL CABINET AT H & I SCRUBBER BLOCK HOUSE. This item is for demolition of existing SCADA terminal cabinet at Plant No. 2, H & I Scrubber Block House which was not included in the Contract documents. The new Remote I 10 interface cabinet installed by this project contains all connections required by the new control system guidelines,thereby making the existing cabinet obsolete. This demolition freed up valuable space for future equipment installation. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00016 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 028 dated July 24,2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 565.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days v Page 5 of 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10944 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Southern Contracting Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 23,2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1A Consultant: Spec Services ITEM 9— DEMOLITION OF HOUSEKEEPING PAD AT H & I SCRUBBER BLOCK HOUSE. This item is for the demolition of the existing housekeeping pad for the 480V Motor Control Center at the Plant 2 H & I North Scrubber block house. The Contractor is also to install a new concrete housekeeping pad and felt between the block walls and the pad. The existing housekeeping pad broke apart while trying to saw cut and jack-hammer for the installation of steel channel in accordance with Project Documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00008 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No.024 dated April 26, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,095.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10-125 VOLT DC POWER TO 480 VOLT SW ITCHGEAR SWGR-RC This item is for additions required to provide 125 Volt DC power to 480 Volt switchgear SWGR-RC at Plant No. 2 Power Building C. The 125 VDC power is required for circuit breaker operation and indication. Original construction bid drawings do not show any 125 VDC power to SWGR-RC. The required work includes additional battery and battery rack capacity,two fused disconnect switches and associated conduit and wiring. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference Districts Field Change Order No.00024 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 023 dated July 23,2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,005.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 6 of 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Southern Contracting Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1A Consultant: Spec Services ITEM 11 —MCC-TWF GROUND CONDUCTOR This item is for changes required to install a ground conductor in the underground conduit ductbank between existing Manhole and MCC-TWF at Plant No. 2 Truck Wash Facilities. Original construction bid drawings indicated that a ground conductor was installed in the conduit system feeding MCC-TW F from Power Building D. Field investigation found that no ground conductor existed. As a grounding conductor is required by codes, standards and specifications, the Contractor was requested to install and connect a new ground conductor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00022 and Southern Contracting Companys Letter SCC COR No. 034 dated July 31,2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,140.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 12—ADDED COMMUNICATION OPTIONS ON POWER METERS/MONITORS This item is to change the Communication Options on the Power Measurement Ltd. Model No. 7500ION Power Meters/Monitors (12 Meters/Monitors)to be supplied with new low voltage swltchgear. Project Standard and Detailed Specifications; required the use of Power Measurement Ltd. Model No. 7500ION meter for the equipment power metering/monitoring systems. During the equipment review and approval process, the District requested communications capabilities that are in addition to those specified (addition of Ethernet Fiber Option 'PO') in order to work with the proposed Electrical Communications System. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No.00013 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 032R dated June 12,2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,660.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days a Page 7 of 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contractina Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33.1A Consultant: Spec Services ITEM 13—STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS AT POWER BUILDING NO. 1 This item Includes costs to add structural supports and modification of existing structural supports at Plant 1 Power Building No. 1. The addition of structural supports and modification of existing structural supports is required to allow installation of new 480V MCC-E. Upon field investigation, it was found that the existing floor plate aluminum supports required additional structural supports in lieu of details shown on project drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00014 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 039 dated July 15, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $950.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 14—LOCAL READY PILOT LIGHT—At E-340 This item is for changes required to install"Local Ready" indication lights, matching the factory wiring, In seven (7) motors starters installed in new MCC-RAS-E2, in addition to testing, Point-to-Point and 'As-built'drawings. Addendum No. 3 to the Project Bid Documents added schematic drawing standards not originally in the Project Bid Documents package. This addition changed the requirements of the control schemes in all cases. The costs associated with this Item Include the addition of terminals, schematic drawings additions and switch changes. The "Local Ready" indication lights were inadvertently left of off the schematics for these seven (7) motors starters to be installed in new MCC-RAS-E2. This Item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00025 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 043 dated November 11, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,300.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 8 of 12 0 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 23,2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1 A Consultant: Spec Services ITEM 15—MISCELLANEOUS MOTOR CIRCUITS IN MCC-0 This Item is for changes required to match the existing field wiring in four(4) motor circuits installed in new MCC-0 at Plant No. 1 Blower Building. The existing field wiring as-found was questioned on RFI No. 00113. The additional costs required were to revise wiring, wire routing,tagging and terminations, along with changes to Point-To-Point and Schematic diagrams. The District preference was to retain the existing connections. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6A of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00026 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 053 dated November 15, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $855.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 16— 12 KV SERVICE CENTER AUTO-TRANSFER SWITCH AND PANEL This item is for changes required to relocate the new 600 Amp Auto-Transfer Switch (ATS) and new 480 Volt Distribution Panel 'SC'at Plant No. 2, 12 KV Service Center. The dimensions for the new ATS, along with Distribution Panel 'SC', were larger than anticipated, requiring relocation to the North wall of the room which allows present and future unobstructed access to the equipment and the swltchgear. This change resulted in changes in cable and conduit lengths and routing,and in"as- built"drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00027 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No. 050 dated November 15, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,950.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days c Page 9 of 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 23. 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1A Consultant: Spec Services ITEM 17—PLANT NO. 1 BLOWER BUILDING BASEMENT SANDBAG BARRIER This Rem is for changes required to install a sandbag water barrier around temporary MCC-0 equipment located at Plant No. 1 Blower Building Basement. The sandbag barrier was an Operations and Maintenance requirement to protect the temporary MCC equipment needed for the shutdown and transfer of loads from existing MCC-Q to the temporary MCC in the basement. The barrier was required to prevent potential damage from an unanticipated process leak in the basement. The sandbag barrier is two feet high, is approximately 102 feet long and is lined with plastic sheeting to prevent seepage. This Item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No.00023 and Southern Contracting Company's Material Cost Statement. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,460.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 18—REPLACE CABLE FROM MCC-MA TO MCC-MC This Rem is for the addition of cable required to replace existing cable from MCC-MA to MCC-MC at Plant No. 2. Circuit MA-457 cable length to MCC-MC is indicated on contract drawings to be 280 feet of# 1/0, 3 conductor tray cable. The length has been determined to be approximately 600 feet. When the discrepancy was identified by RFI No. 00129,the District preference was to change this feeder entirely, rather than splice cables in cable tray. Costs involved in this Rem include the labor to remove existing cable and the purchase and installation of approximately 600 feet of new# 1/0, 3 conductor tray cable. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00028 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC COR No.057 dated December 5,2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,170.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 10 of 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1A Consultant: Spec Services ITEM 19—LIGHTING PANEL"MD"AT PLANT NO. 1 THICKENER BUILDING. This item is to change the new 30 circuit Lighting Panel 'MD'to a 42 circuit panel at Plant No. 1 Thickener Building. This change was required following field investigation of the lighting panel and circuits. The field investigation showed there were 38 circuits existing, and that 2 pole and GFIC breakers were required. These additional circuits were added after the project bid date and were not shown on the contract documents. Costs involved with this Rem are the difference between the 30 and 42 circuit panel interiors (the exterior enclosure remains the same). This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00029 and Southern Contracting Company's Letter SCC CDR No. 060 dated December 18,2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,695.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 20—STORAGE OF NEW ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AT PLANT NO. i This item is for changes required to provide for storage of new electrical equipment at Plant No. 1 due to the delays imposed by problems with installation of the equipment in Electrically Classified areas. The Contactor was requested to coordinate the relocation of existing stored equipment and the subsequent equipment arrivals into the new storage area. Some of the equipment that was temporarily stored outdoors at Plant No. 2 was relocated to an enclosed building at Plant No. 1. The temporary outdoor storage was determined to be undesirable due to the delay of this equipment installation caused by the Classified Areas issue. Added costs included in this item include labor and equipment to accomplish the relocation of electrical equipment. This work was accomplished by the Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 00030, Project Meeting Minutes No. 00066, dated 8/28/02, No. 00068, dated 9/11/02, No.00070, dated 9/25/02 and SCC CDR No. 019,"Proposal for Relocating Electrical Equipment to Plant No. 1" ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 19,855.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 126,720.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 11 of 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Co. C.O. No.: Three3 Date: April 23. 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1A Consultant: Spec Services The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. it is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order,and no direct or Indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: July 5,2001 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 5,2003 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 5,2003 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: July 5,2003 Original Contract Price $ 6,329,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 232,461.00 This Change (Add) $ 126,720.00 Amended Contract Price $ 6,688,181.00 i Page 12 of 12 i ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Southern Contracting Co. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: APH123. 2003 Job: Standby Power and Reliability Improvements—J-33-1A Consultant: Spec Services Board Authorization Date: April 23, 2003 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager Approved by: David Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: Southern Contracting Co. Contractor Date EDMS 003745707 PDC COMMITTEE 7eeInp Dak To so.m Dlr. 04/03/03 09/23/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Numb PD 03-18 I[em Numbe Ikm 13ftl) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dean Fisher, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. P1-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$54,992 and a time extension of 21 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $70,934,528. SUMMARY Background • Job Number P1-37, Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, includes the construction of 16 new primary clarifiers with all support equipment, improvements to existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15, and improvements to Primary Clarifiers 1-5. • Brown and Caldwell prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction on October 24, 2001. • Change Order No. 6 includes 12 items of additional work, and 4 items of deleted work. There are no errors and 6 omissions associated with this change order. There is a 21 day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this project are $3,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date January 7, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date November 7, 2005 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 5 Current Contract Completion Date March 18, 2006 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 .i J Change Order Content Item Description Amount Days TypMCondition No. 1 Effluent Distribution Struct. $28,136 0 Om Modifications 2 Trickling Filter Overflow 10 685 0 Chad3 Delete Trickling Filter Flowmeter 10,596 0 De4 Handrail Modifications 26,040 0 De5 Trickling Filter Feed Valve Subst. 32 678 0 De6 Ferric Chloride Flow Switch 0 0 Omsson 7 Top Deck Conduit Routing 17,331 0 Omission 8 Ductwork Modifications 10,942 0 Omission 9 PLC 1/0 Configuration 10,383 0 Design Change 10 Cable Tray Changes 46,000 0 Design Change 11 Ferric Chloride Float Switch mount 4,664 0 Omission 12 Tipping Skimmers V.E. 8,454 0 Design Change 13 Blower Ctrl Panel Pwr Supply 1,041 0 Design Change 14 Trolleys for blower and pumps 3,352 0 Des! n Chan e 15 600V Motor Control/Remote 1/0 42,228 01 Design Change 16 Contract Time Extension 01 21 1 Design Change Total Change Order No. 6 1 $54,9921 21 Items 3 and 5 involve coordination with the P1-76 Trickling Filter project. Item 16 provides a time extension associated with previous Change Order No. 5. Additional details are provided in the attached Change Order. Job Completion The project is 32% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 70,366,000 Previously Authorized Changes $ 513,536 This Change $ 54,992 Change Orders to Date $568,528 Percentage Increase to Date .81% Amended Contract Price $ 70,934,528 C:VkcunxnUdntl 6WlrpeywpeLLudl Bntlnpa\Temppery ImemN FlI..WLI(BFf11bm Ildl.P1J14x RWnd: WW1 Page 2 1 91 4 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section a, CIP, 131-37) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEOA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order GC:ms:lc L.Na Mc AM 6eMryCLepeYxel SM MMTe an InWMW RNMOMFUISM 1'. d)E P1J]O Imo,,,,,: �1 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Primary ClarlOars No.1641 and Relatad FaclRLee Job No.P141 +vReia6® nsm _�1m8 m"'. esnl m H11Mam aRaa?nrAx� n ammaaen Wino nox w onnox ro�@o rem ibH on�rN�w )e s mmo I Mo. vex s rn on.. f rei mo s r rnx au f vov f •- f fmw f moamr s m r m " f noo v om v rmv apnWWIM W/.M $ moaJoaf f N.TS]8 s uw s mx16ID s c�aiBwBn mimuwm f mo f a am - f mom f om t m n>a mw mm m :` t zm000 a zmm s ED.. mst co'o f a., f ftm f van , f aaaem roru s - f xW).am s t n.W).coo �+ v nmuo f umx > t x.max xtv aeAnbaM's LOGr BP4¢Si HFf f B,W).WJ s i BBW)W) s amma s ...I. amonl. 'd.ms.l4 N11 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 1f07 AND RELATED FACILITIES JOB NO.P7.37 AUTXORnc^ REM APPROVAL COMPACT CONTR D TCOST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED TIME TIME DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) TO DATE DAYS CONTRA $@Y1999 $ 70,36fi,000.00 $ 70,36 =.00 OAO 14 14 CO NO.1 1019I2001 $ $ 7t1,380,000A0 0.00 0 1000 CO NO.2 8I1I2002 $ 75,219A0 $ 70661,214.00 0.11 A9 1069 CO NO.3 1021I2002 $ 48,736A0 $ N,1891950A0 0.18 0 IM9 CO NO.G 12/1&2002 $ 356,059.W $ 70A06,009A0 0.60 82 1531 CO NO.5 2/2Til2003 $ 3$527.00 $ m,079,530.00 O.m 0 1531 Page 1 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"Il27 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six 6 Date: APH123. 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16.31 and Related Facilities,Job No. Pt-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Amount of this Change Order(Add)(BeAueli)$54,992.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes In the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —EFFLUENT DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE COVERS This change modifies covers and actuator supports for two specified effluent distribution structures, adding aluminum cover plates, manhole covers, PVC liner, concrete reinforcement, and actuator supports. Cover details were provided to correct omissions in the plans. Additional concrete reinforcement and structural supports for two 60-inch electro-hydraulic valve operators were added in order to correct omissions on the plans. Three additional access openings were added to the east structure and two to the west structure in order to provide maintenance access. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-22). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $28,136.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days ITEM 2—TRICKLING FILTER OVERFLOW This Item provides labor, materials,and equipment to resolve flooding problems caused by 9/16/02 accidental spill from Trickling Filter#4. Work includes removing and disposing of water and debris from the excavation area, and reconstruction of HDPE piping which floated during the incident. Flooding of the work area was due to plant operations, and was not the fault of the Contractor. The work was accomplished on contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B)2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-31). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,685.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days Page 2 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 3—DELETE TRICKLING FILTER FLOW METER This item deletes a flow meter and related electrical items, including 700 LF of 1-inch and 2-inch conduit, and 1,200 LF of cable. The flowmeter was originally specified in order to monitor flow to the trickling filters. During design,the pipeline was deleted. The flow meter and related electrical Items also should have dean deleted, but were not. This change corrects that omission. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48(B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-45). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(10,596.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days ITEM 4— HANDRAIL MODIFICATIONS This item provides 3-line aluminum handrail In lieu of the specified 2-line aluminum handrail, in order to match the standard handrail within the plant. This change Includes all of the handrail being provided on this project, roughly 4,500 feet. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-53). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $26,040.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days ITEM 5—TRICKLING FILTER FEED VALVE SUBSTITUTION This item provides a substitution for the Trickling Filter Feed Valve (11 DFV262) and operator. In lieu of the specified 60-Inch butterfly valve,the Contractor will retrofit and install an existing butterfly valve being salvaged from the PC 6-15 main gallery. In lieu of the specified electro-hydraulic modulating operator,the valve will be equipped with a simple motor operator. P7-37 was originally designed to control flow to the Trickling Filter Project (P1.76). The recently completed P1-76 design determined that the flow control should be a part of the P1-76 Improvements. As a result,the funtion of this valve will change from flow control to isolation. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-54). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(32,678.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days Page 3 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six 6 Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. P1.37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 6— FERRIC CHLORIDE FLOW SWITCH This item revises specification section 17216-3.03 FVCS in order to resolve an incompatibility between the specified material (316 stainless steel) and the process flow(ferric chloride). The new switch material will be Hasteloy C. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-55). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days ITEM 7—TOP DECK CONDUIT ROUTING This item provides additional conduit routing within the specified clarifier top deck in order to correct omissions in the plans. The concrete deck will be thickened in the transition from the existing scum gallery to the top deck of the new clarifiers in various locations. In three locations, concrete conduit bridges will be provided crossing the effluent channel. At four locations, concrete conduit routing will be added in the vicinity of the walkways near the existing scum gallery. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-56). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $17,331.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days ITEM 8—DUCTWORK MODIFICATIONS This hem modifies the specified ductwork on Sheet H103 in the intersection of the PC6-15 main gallery and scum gallery in order to avoid conflict with new and existing piping. Additional work includes approximately 80 LF of 26-inch x 24-inch duct with (8) bends, and 16 LF of 12-inch x 24-Inch duct with (2) bends. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-57). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,942.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days Page 4 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mamate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six(81 Data: Aori123. 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities.Job No. P1.37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 9—PLC 1/0 CONFIGURATION This Item provides engineering labor to re-allocate the PLC 1/0 to a location that is congruent to the related I/O for those pieces of equipment as described in RFIs 177,208, 209 and 210. The contractor shall review the new assignments with the District engineer and document the revised assignments in the submittal documents as well as the as-bultt contract documents. During the design several 1/0 points were missed or added after the initial PLC rack assignments were made. Late in the design and early In the construction of the project these were added to the PLC as they were discovered, and where added were spare PLC points were available. From a design standpoint this is acceptable, but the District staff had concerns that this would eventually lead to problems with equipment reliability and complicated maintenance troubleshooting. This leads to situations with too much equipment on one PLC card, or with one piece of equipment spread over several PLC cards, making troubleshooting difficult. Rather than build the panels in this manner, the District staff decided to have the contractor reassign the PLC points in a logical manner prior to fabrication. This resulted In some additional engineering and documentation work on the part of the contractor. Approximately 125 1/0 points will be reassigned by this change. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-67). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,383.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days ITEM 10—CABLE TRAY CHANGES This item provides a credit to provide substitute cable tray materials in lieu of stainless steel. In general, the cable tray system material is being changed to aluminum for power and control, and hot- dipped galvanized after fabrication (HDGAF)for signal cabling. The change affects approximately 3,200 LF of 24-inch tray, 1,800 LF of 12-inch tray, and 400 LF of 6-inch tray. Covers will be used for Power and control cable tray will be covered near personnel work spaces. Covers will be used on signal tray near personnel work spaces and where adjacent to power and control cables. The project specifications were taken from the OCSD Master Specifications which compared cable tray for severe exterior locations but did not Include Interior locations. District staff recently concluded that many applications would benefit from using less expensive materials Including aluminum for power and control, and galvanized steel for signal trays. Galvanized steel provides electromagnetic shielding for signal trays. Both materials provide good service life in many locations while being more cost-effective than stainless steel. The master specifications will be revised accordingly in order to reduce future costs. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48(B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-13137.61). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(46,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days Page 5 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six 6 Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Primate Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 11 —FERRIC CHLORIDE FLOAT SWITCH MOUNT This item adds a 4-inch flanged outlet, a mounting bracket, and a non-metalic NEMA 4x junction box to each of the three RTP Chemical Tanks in order to mount the tank high-high level float switches. The change was initiated by the design consultant in order to correct an omission in the plans. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-62). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,664.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days ITEM 12—TIPPING SKIMMERS VALUE ENGINEERING This Item modifies Sheet M162 of the contract documents. The 12"GLDI (Glass Lined Ductile Iron) Elbow and fitting shown on "Plan at Elev. 35.0"shall be changed to PVC. This provides a more corrosion resistant product and eliminates the need for an additive change order. Through Value Engineering,the Contractor will provide a credit for the reduction in construction effort. The costs associated with this Change Order Item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-63). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(8,454.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days ITEM 13—BLOWER PANEL POWER SUPPLY This Item modifies the power feed to each of the blower control panels from 11 DPNO01 to the corresponding blower motor MCC locations. The agitation air blower system consists of(3) blowers. Each blower has a motor and a control panel. As originally designed, each motor had a different power source than It's corresponding control panel. This results in a potential safety problem because a shutdown could Isolate either the motor OR the related control panel,while leaving the other piece of equipment energized. In addition,the control panels were all powered from the same source location which would lead to reduced flexibility for maintenance Isolation. This change resolves both problems by serving each blower control panel from the same power source as the corresponding motor. This change is necessary for worker and equipment safety. The costs associated with this Change Order Item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference 137-64). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(1,041.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days Page 6 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six 6 Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 14—TROLLEYS FOR BLOWERS AND DILUTE SLUDGE PUMPS This Item adds trolleys for the blower room and dilute sludge pumps. One 3-Ton trolley is provided for the blower room, and (6)2-Ton trolleys are provided for the dilute sludge pumps. The Contract Documents provide beams for trolleys, but do not provide trolleys. Maintenance has requested that the trolleys be provided as part of the contract. These trolleys are necessary to facilitate the removal of blowers, dilute sludge pumps and related equipment. The costs associated with this Change Order Rem were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-65). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,352.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days ITEM 15—600 VOLT MOTOR CONTROL REMOTE 1/0 This item modifies the specified 600V Motor Control Centers per submittal review comments and RFP- 022. Work includes modifying the wiring motor control schematics,adding lights, adding contact blocks to hand switches, adding PLC remote 1/0 hardware, and providing the engineering to update the documentation and the 1/0 PLC rack assignments. The design of P1-37 did not Incorporate many standards developed during the latter part of design.This change adds discrete 1/0 for the MCC-X that was found to be deficient during submittal review. This change incorporates changes necessary to update the motor control schematics to the OCSD design templates. In addition, this change resolves specification conflicts regarding PLC hardware and PLC rack assignments for spare PLC points. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-66, FCO-P137-68). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $42,228.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 days Page 7 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Maroate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six 6 Date: APH123, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities. Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 16—CONTRACT DELAY This Item extends the contract time due to added work associated with Item No. 2 of Change Order 5 —Gallery Floor Drains and Item 3 of Change Order 5—Additional Dewatering Pump. These changes presented additional work that delayed the critical path concrete installation, but were not included with the original change order items due to a schedule analysis that was performed at a later date. Portions of the time to perform these Items of work was concurrent with other delays resulting from the electrical duct banks (CO 4, Item 2) and the effluent structure redesign (CO 2, Item 10)and is not included as part of the requested change. This Item was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements(Reference FCO-P137-11, FCO-P137-16). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 21 days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $54,992.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 21 Calendar Days Page 8 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX $127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six 6 Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 21 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Item 16 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 7,2002 Original Contract Time: 1,400 Days Original Completion Date: November 7,2005 Time Extension this C.O.: 21 Days Total Contract Time Extension: 152 Days Revised Contract Time: 1552 Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 8, 2006 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $ 70,366,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 513,536.00 This Change (Add) (Deduet) $ 568,528.00 Amended Contract Price $ 70,934,528.00 '. Page 9 of 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mamate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six 6 Date: April 23. 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Board Authorization Date: April 23, 2003 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John D. Linder, P.E. Date Engineering & Construction Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION Contractor Date EDMS(003745514 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date T°M ofM. 4/3/03 4 223/03 AGENDA REPORT RanN°nYler Noiihef PDC03-19 Item 13fe1 Orange County Sanitation Dish iR FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator, John Falkenstein, Engineer SUBJECT: SUNFLOWER PUMP STATION DRIVE REPLACEMENT JOB NO. P1-62 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P1-62, with Ark Construction Co., authorizing an addition of$60,399 and a time extension of 396 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $430,399. SUMMARY Background • This project replaces the two Sunflower Pump Station motors, drive reduction gears, and related electrical and control systems located at Plant No. 1. The modifications to the pump drives are being made to improve efficiency and reduce maintenance costs. • The plans and specifications were prepared by RW Beck, and the contract was awarded to Ark Construction Co. on December 20, 2000. • Change Order No. 1 includes two items of added work and a time extension of 396 calendar days to Job No. P1-62. Liquidated damages on this contract are $500 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date March 19, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date September 14, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date September 14, 2001 Projected Completion Date June 15, 2003 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages NA Liquidated Damage Assessment NA Change Order No. 1 Content �v Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Rework Sunflower Pump Drive Bases $56,000 396 Design Change 2 Add Ground Conductor and Conduit 4,399 0 Omission Total —Change Order No. 1 $60,399 396 Item No. 1 includes a time extension of 396 days. This delay was caused by the following items: 152 calendar days for submittal review, investigation, redesign, and approval of the Contractor's cost proposal to modify the concrete pump bases. e 62 calendar days for the Contractor to modify one existing concrete base and install pump No. 1. • 182 calendar days as a result of the District Operations Department restricting the Contractor from working on the pump drives from October 15, 2001 to April 15, 2002 due to the potential of high storm flows within Treatment Plant No. 1, which would require both pumps to be operational. Job Completion This project is 90% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 370,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change $ 60,399.00 Change Orders to Date $ 0.00 Percentage Increase to Date 16.32% Final Contract Price $ 430,399.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None ' CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt from CEQA requirements ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order JBF:lc BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SUNFLOWER PUMP STATION DRIVE REPLACEMENT JOB NO.1`182 noBep VgO . M:meD Npi[D PsiWPno wE<TmA Nwen euMeiN pV00eT INCflG9¢ WW[i iO pl. REOVIE pVEMOM20iWH G.. E TD GPRry:I ® 3 G euunw GnlrM EW UO 3 W] { 3 VIIWECi iOfN i N] i O]l i i 3 d5>Sfi 3 Hi { eN { NHmbml4Cm pMILCENR { . E . e 1 1 1{ .11 T)eA I i B%.Ml BK CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Sun lmoer Pump SeNon DNYe Replacement Job No.PI- 2 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHOR6 D AUTHORRED REM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIMETODATE (WMUTATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CO 3/182001 S 3ri1.000.00 E 3N,000.00 0.0M 1Ep 180 Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Am Construction Co. C.O. No.: one (1) Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement.Job No. P1.62 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(BeduGl) $60,399.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —REWORK SUNFLOWER PUMP DRIVE BASES The Contractor was directed to perform the following work on the existing Sunflower Pump Drive concrete bases to install the contract specified Nuttall reduction gear pump drive and motor combination skids: 1. Remove existing concrete and reinforcing steel to a depth of 17"from the top of each existing pump drive base. 2. Add new concrete and reinforcing steel to the sides of the existing concrete bases. 3. Relocate two existing screw shaft gravity oil lube systems. The new Nuttall pump drive skids were too deep and wide for the existing concrete base footprint. It was necessary to remove approximately 17 inches of concrete from the top of the bases and add concrete and reinforcing steel to accommodate the new drive skids and strengthen the pump bases. The Contractor was also directed to relocate the existing screw shaft gravity oil tube system on each pump as the existing installation interfered with the new pump drive skid location. The contract drawings did not show the above additional work nor make allowance for the increased depth of the new Nuttall pump drive skids. It was necessary to redesign the existing concrete bases to make allowance for the additional weight and size of the new pump drive skids. The District Operations Department restricted the Contractor from working on the drives from October 15, 2001 through April 15,2002. This was due to the anticipated seasonal rains,which would require the operation of both pump drives in case of Increased flows into Treatment Plant No. 1. The contract documents did not restrict the Contractor from working from October 15,2001 through April 15, 2001. A breakdown of the time extension days is as follows: Nuttall gear drive submittal review and approval 24 Calendar days Stop work by the District Operations Department 182 Calendar days Investigation and redesign of the concrete bases 93 Calendar days Review and approval of Contractor cost proposal to modify the bases 35 Calendar days Contractor modification work on Sunflower Pump Drive base No. 1 62 Calendar days This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01, (Reference PCH No. 1; FCO No. 1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $56,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 396 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Arc Construction Co. C.O. No.: one (1) Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement,Job No. Pt-62 ITEM 2— ELECTRICAL GROUND CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a ground conductor from Motor Control Centers "SFA"and"SFB"to each new pump drive. The work included furnishing and installing 300 lineal feet of#2 copper ground wire, 180 lineal feet of 1" PVC coated steel conduit, conduit fittings and wire connections. The ground wire and conduit were not shown on the contract drawings. District electrical standards require all system grounds to be connected to equipment grounds. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48(B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01. (Reference FCO No. 2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,399.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $60,399.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 396 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 396-day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: March 19, 2001 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: September 14,2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 396 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 396 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 576 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date: October 15, 2002 Projected Final Completion Date June 15, 2003 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 370,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 60,399.00 Amended Contract Price $ 430,399.00 M1 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Arc Construction Co. C.O. No.: one (1) Date: April 23, 2003 Job: Sunflower Pump Station Drive Replacement, Job No. P7-62 Board Authorization Date: April 23,2003 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: ARK CONSTRUCTION CO. Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Mee00103 ro /23/03 r. 4/3/03 4/23/03 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number PDC03-20 Item 13rn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Vicki Henn, Engineer SUBJECT: CIRCULAR CLARIFIER DRIVE REPLACEMENT- UNITS D THROUGH Q, JOB NO. P2.85, AND SLUDGE BLANKET INDICATOR INSTALLATION- UNITS D THROUGH Q, JOB NO. SP-73. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve plans and specifications for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Or Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation- Units D through Q, Job No. SP-73, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4) Award a construction contract to J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., for Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement- Units D through Q, Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation- Units D through Or Job No. SP-73, for an amount not to exceed $1,485,239. SUMMARY • The mechanical drive equipment that turns the primary clarifier mechanisms at Plant No. 2 have reached the end of their useful lives and must be replaced. • Sludge blanket level indicators will be installed to remotely read the sludge level, so operators can optimize sludge pumping. • In March 25, 2002, the District issued a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Black and Veatch, Inc. for preliminary design studies, design, and services during construction for replacing the primary clarifier drives at Plant No. 2. Design work was completed in January 2003, and the project was put out for bid on March 4, 2003. • Sealed bids were received on March 18, 2003. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows (budgets and bids for P2-85 and SP-73 combined): Project Budget: $ 3,467,000.00 Construction Budget: $ 2,242,000.00 Engineer's Estimate: $ 3,015,000.00 Low Responsive Bid: $ 1,485,239.00 High Bid: $ 1,846,900.00 Number of Bids: 4 CaOwumanni aM 5.•Rg,,eopeLLccY eelgngInTempotary Internal FIIOMOLK3FFWBm 13R).P2 65 doc RmI..E:flIMS Page 1 r s, • Staff recommends award of the construction contract to J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., for an amount not to exceed $1,485,239.00. • Project budgets will be combined to minimize administrative paperwork for construction administration and construction inspection, and the construction contract. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of $1,485,239 for the construction contract is being requested. This authorization is within the P2-85 and SP-73 budgets. The total project budget for both projects combined is $3,467,000. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for additional detail. Because jobs P2-85 and SP-73 were designed and bid together, and will be constructed at the same time, combining the job budgets for construction will minimize administrative paperwork for construction administration and construction inspection, and the construction contract. There is no overall change to the CIP Budget due to this action. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: 2001-02 Budget Section 8, page 7 Project Nos. P2-85 and SP-73) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • Plant No. 2 has 14 circular primary clarifiers, Basins D through Q. The mechanical drives operating the sludge and scum collectors in the circular clarifiers are beyond their useful lives and are showing signs of significant wear and several have experienced failure. • The two capital project budgets, P2-85 and SP-73, were approved in the FY 2001/02 Budget. • A PSA with Black and Veatch to provide engineering services for the design and installation support of the Primary Clarifier Drive Replacement, Job No. 132-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation, Job No. SP-73, was awarded in March 2002, and the Plans, Specifications, and Bid Documents are complete. C:�um.np..d B.XInpMpp.LLpctl swnp.w..m.,i ..el.•Cl1 psvt.m 13nn4cd Rwin.a: W1=8 Page 2 • The combined two projects consist of: - Replacement of 14 circular clarifier drive units, and associated electrical, structural and control requirements. - Installation of 14 sludge blanket level indicators and associated electrical and control requirements. - Black and Veatch will also further evaluate clarifier equipment during construction while each clarifier is empty and prepare a summary report for the condition of the other clarifier components. This report will be used as base information for scoping future primary treatment rehabilitation projects. This portion of the work is included under the existing PSA with Black and Veatch, and no additional funding is requested for this item. • Construction will take approximately 16 months and will begin with the Notice to Proceed anticipated in May 2003. The completion of construction is estimated to be September 20D4. ALTERNATIVES Do not replace the clarifier drive equipment. This alternative would leave an increasing number of secondary clarifiers at Plant No. 2 unavailable while being repaired by the maintenance staff. This alternative would also be more expensive due to unplanned basin shut downs and emergency work orders. CEQA FINDINGS This project is a maintenance type capital project for an existing facility and is exempt from CEQA per Section 15301 (b). ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Bid Summary C:O=m ma &OnpTyapeLLcce15 NiATe�nary Inert FllftALMFEV,em 13(0.n45. x xewaa:VIM Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PLANT NO.2 PRIMARY CLARIFIER DRIVE REPLACEMENT AND SLUDGE BLANKET INDICATOR INSTALLATION JOB NO. P2-85 AND JOB NO.SP-73 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS TM PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTBATED PROJECTNASK AUVORZED PROJECT BUDGET RENSED MITHORWED AUTHORUATON TOTAL E%PEND"RE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORMATON TO DATE TO DATE('%) Pro Dev. S 55C 5 61.M'U S 67C 5 6'.WO 5 67" S 23.2W 35°. Stu} ermT $ 2i" $ $ $ 24.000 $ 24,OA $ m7w %°.. C uM PSA 5 5 353.0. $ 3S3 M0 $ 35J.W0 S 3 m" $ 2Q," N% O SUK $ t50.000 5 . $ W.000 $ W.000 $ W.000 E W.000 $ 2.500 CUrsUlt mC 00 S 5.59]000 $ 2.242.DDD E M.161 E 1.485239 S 1. 9259 S t"5259 C mmrm AtrnMUfpn E It OpJ $ 31.W0 S 31.OW S 63 pT S 62.000 S 62.000 U. Caub nm I $ 65.CW 5 $t UJ3 $ Bt,gq- 5 1630W 5 162,000 S 162.000 V. C, $ 3W.OW $ 6910W S 59a.Tbt $ 1.46))61 S R.Wrs W COSis TOTK $ 6.204.W0 5 1J67." $ $ 3.467" $ <W.W0 5 1y0S259 S 2.203.259 $ 2W.5W 13'. March 18, 2003 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NO.:1 BID TABULATION CIRCULAR CLARIFIER DRIVE REPLACEMENT— UNITS D THROUGH Q, JOB NO. P2-85, CIRCULAR CLARIFIER SLUDGE BLANKET INDICATORS — UNITS D THROUGH Q, JOB NO. SP-73 Engineer's Estimate: $3,015,000 Construction Contract Budget: $2,242,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 1,485,239 2. PACIFIC MECHANICAL CORPORATION $ 1,599,708 3. S.S. MECHANICAL CORPORATION $ 1,723,246 4. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 1,846,900 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. in the bid amount of$1,485,239 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering C.TileNetW SP2.86 Bid Tab.dm Revised=19 8 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411 J.F.S COmtraaim,1. Paafie MacMmN CapOretbn SS Mearenb Cmp . apn Ap fly UM Tm m Td UM Taal Hu Pau Rke Ptu R1x PM1.c Phe (I 1 1 Svn E n.mm E i5.0 w E JSm0.00 S M.MW E ]Sm m E JSm0.00 2 t Sun E E50.138.00 E ESi0.' w E 1�mw E tm mw E 1265,,C w E 1,2EB2GE.00 S 1 Sun E 8 m E cmm E 100E E 10000m E t mw E 15W0.0a 6 t San E 0.A000.00 E 0.50mm E 120000.00 E 121000.00 E NSIMW E 055.00 M 77 pdaiaiiaaTF11A;;,.A'. Mion,llmc. 3-:^ 1,5S1,l�,Op`: se 'f:J242dem. J.F.Shea Coreuualan,Inc. Pacific MecM1aniral CorporaNan S.S Mcchmiml Corporation Margate COne lm,I.. Pppm QY lmtl Td M10 P�Im Pibo 1 1Svn 8 TS.000.W E FamOm 2 1 Sum E 1BPE .W E t =.00 3 1 San E 0.00 w E 50 w a t Sun E 10000000 E Ia0.00 w 'ua(.)or oabm li $ ap�Wiuivepf9W',.. "" S 1,8C&EBp.00 Margate CaWruaiOn,Iris. cwwavnryrzm m sumw xitl9� MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday,April 9, 2003, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on April 9, 2003,at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present,as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake P.Anderson, General Manager Brian Brady, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer Roy Moore, Vice Chair Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Alberta Christy Carol Beekman, Communications Services Mike Duvall Manager Mark Leyes David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Joy Neugebauer Bob Dolan, Director of Operations& Maintenance James W. Silva Mike White, Controller Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager Steve Anderson, Vice Board Chair Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Sonya Wassgren Directors Absent OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel Don Hughes Toby Weissert RandyFuhnnan Ryal Wheeler Mark Conway Mark Mutz Bob Gaggle (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Mark Mutz spoke to the Directors regarding the District's existing retirement program and its inferiority as compared to other agencies within Orange County. He encouraged the Directors to consider enhancing the retirement program. Randy Fuhrman requested he be allowed to speak prior to the consideration of Item I I(a). Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 r April 9, 2003 ' (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Brady reminded Directors that a Board Workshop was scheduled for Apdt 16 at 6:00 p.m. to discuss the CIP Validation and the Full Secondary Treatment Implementation Schedule. He stated Items would be taken out of order following the consent calendar as follows: Item 12(a), Items 13(a) (1)and (2), Item 11(a)and Item 11(b). (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report_ (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCEITREASURER Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer, referred the Directors to the Treasurer's Report distributed to the Directors that evening. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. (8) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES MANAGER Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager, reported that a letter would be sent out this month to those communities and businesses in Huntington Beach that would be impacted by the construction of the Warner Avenue Sewer Relief project. A neighborhood meeting is scheduled to be held on April 29 to address the concerns of the citizens in the area. In response to questions from the prior month's meeting by Director Neugebauer on the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)television ad, the committee viewed the commercial. Donna Carter of Johnson/Ukropina, the agency that created the television commercial, reviewed the history of how the ad was created and the screening process used by OCWD and OCSD before the ad was finalized and released. Directors requested the review and input process for additional ads include review by additional Sanitation District Directors to ensure the appropriate message is conveyed. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, provided the Directors with a brief update on the SAWPA issues. A Joint Management Committee meeting is scheduled for April 15. A letter was sent to SAWPA by Chair McCracken requesting SAWPA provide a proposal for resolution to the cost allocation issues by April 8. Chair McCracken received a response from SAWPA via a fax sent to Anaheim City Hall at 4:00 p.m.,on April 7. The proposal will be reviewed and a report will be provided to the Board of Directors at the April 23, 2003 meeting. He briefly discussed the attempts to get this issue placed on the JMC agenda for the April 15 meeting. SAWPA agreed to mail a supplemental agenda the following day. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 April 9, 2003 (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The Chair ordered that the March 12, 2003 minutes for the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved,as mailed. b. FAHR03-20 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2003. C. FAHR03-21 Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP)Monthly Report. d. FAHR03-22 Receive and file Employment Status Report as of March 27, 2003. e. FAHR03-23 Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. f. FAHR03-24 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve SAFETY-POL-102— Personal Protective Equipment Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (f) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR03-27 Forecast of Health Insurance Premiums for FY2003/2004 Lisa Tomko introduced Mark Conway, District's insurance broker,who reviewed projected cost increases of approximately 20%for medical benefits, and escalated prescription costs. District benefit plans have not changed in the past five years,and he suggested that alternatives to existing benefits could assist in reducing premium costs. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened In Closed Session at 5:32 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 and 54956.8 to discuss and consider Agenda Item Nos. 13(a)(1)and (2). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2,and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There were no reportable actions taken by the Committee re Agenda Item Nos. 13(a)(1)or(2). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION:At 6:30 p.m.,the Committee reconvened in regular session. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 April 9, 2003 (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR03-25 Consider Sewer Service User Fee altematives for FY 03/04, 04/05, 05/06, 06107, and 07/08 to recommend to the Board of Directors for approval. Randy Fuhrman encouraged the Directors to consider increasing existing sewer service user fees from$87.50 per year to$180 per year. The long- term savings in interest costs would be billions of dollars. Gary Streed, Director of Financelrreasurer, reviewed the various altematives of increasing user fees, and the impacts of those alternatives to the debt policy issues and reserves over a 20-year period. Directors entered into discussion regarding rate increases by all levels of government due to the state budget crisis,and the impact of these increases to residents and businesses. Also discussed was the decision to approve full secondary treatment in July 2002, and the costs that must be paid as a result of that decision. A motion was made and seconded to increase the rates by 20% and borrow$1.24 billion dudng the construction period. Following further discussion, a substitute motion was made to increase sewer service user fees by 10%, borrow$2.31 billion, and revisit user fees in one year. The motion failed by lack of a second. A substitute motion was made and seconded to increase sewer service user fees by 15%, and borrow$1.59 billion, and revisit user fees in one year. MOTION: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors to increase sewer service user fees by 15%,and borrow$1.59 billion,and revisit user fees in one year by a vote of 5 ayes and 4 nays. b. FAHR03-26 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1) Direct staff to issue up to$280 million in new fixed-rate Certificates of Participation (COP) debt; (2)Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Public Resources Advisory Group, for a two-year period for FY03/04, providing for financial advisory services,for an amount not to exceed $75,000;and, (3)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to provide bond counsel services in an amount as yet to be determined. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 Apol 9, 2003 Mike White, Controller, reviewed the COP program, and advised the agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe was being recommended in an amount not to exceed $125,000. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for May 14, 2003 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. le FAHR Committee Secr ry G:\wp.dUa agendaXFAHRXFAHR2003W403N40903 FAHR Minutwdoc FAHRCOMMITTEE MeetlngDae Taed.of0ir. 09/09/03 09/23/03 .( AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-20 14(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2O03 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2003. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Investment Policy. The portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for of the Long-Term Operating Monies, there is an investment policy compliance issue pertaining to the holding of a security that had an acceptable rating at the time of purchase but have since fallen below the minimum rating allowed by the investment policy. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The compliance issue pertains to the holding of a United Airlines (UAL) Asset Backed Security with a par value of$1.6 million, representing 0.5 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating from Moody's has fallen several times, from A3 to BA1, then to BA3, and finally to B3. Likewise, the rating from Standard & Poor's has also fallen several times, first from A- to BBB, then to BB, then to B+, and finally to B-. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if this security was sold. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of"credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. PIMCO continues to monitor the credit closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® Not applicable (information item) e\vy.",eLOen"6EwN Aw^y Pe"mt300]eoen Rauba 11aW�eNWNI"m tafq.T,Yfurer ReouLaoc Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term I' investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. On March 19, 2003, a transfer of$13 million from the PIMCO Short-term Portfolio to LAIF was made to fund current operating expenses. The following table details the book balances of the District's investment accounts at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown on the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts March 31,2003 Yield(%) State of Calif.LAIF $ 13,484,844 1.95(1) Union Bank Checking Account 4,793,778 1.16(1) PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 49,016,216 1.51 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 321,783,364 2.64 Petry Cash 5.000 WA TOTAL a3A9 OA= Debt Service Reserves w/Trusteas $34706389 4.36 (1) This is the annualized yield for the month of February. The March annualized rate was not available as of the date of this report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Graph of Monthly Investment Balances by Type—Last Six Months 2. Investment Transactions and Balances in the State Local Agency Investment Fund 3. PIMCO Monthly Investment Recap & Yield Analysis Report 4. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report—Liquid Operating Monies 5. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report— Long-Term Operating Monies 6. Mellon Trust Net Asset Sector Summary— Liquid Operating Monies 7. Mellon Trust Net Asset Sector Summary—Long-Term Operating Monies 8. Mellon Trust Yield Analysis Report 9. Mellon Trust Portfolio Detail - Consolidated MW:IC G,M.d,aUpaOda,6W,d Agenda Re.11V 0 o..,E Agenda Rep ft C0Tl,em 11([)T—Iurel RapO,,.dM Page 2 11 � 1 1 11 111 111 �. • 1 111 111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII u�u��������u�u�� ,,,,,,,,, 11 111111 iiiiiiii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ��N =z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �:•::•}:?•::•:•: vi� Y >I :;:•ii:•i:•::• 4 '.'•:{�titii ? 'r'� ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 v.•.•r:.•:::. ..r �V:•f�'ii'itt....• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •••4 t�';1;:;:;:;y;:; i.}�{'y} /�•Y!i Y �ir.F... 11 11 11 11 11 11 n s : • • 1 v Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund March 31, 2003 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield' Balance March 1, 2003 $8,984,844 $8,994,844 $8,984,844 1.946 1.945 Deposits: 3/19/2003 13,000,000 13,000,000 13,000,000 1.945 1.945 Withdrawals: 3/5/2003 (2,000,000) (2,ODD,000) (2,000,000) 1.945 1.945 3/12/2003 (6,500,000) (6,500,000) (6,500,000) 1.945 1.945 Total Withdrawls (8,500,000) (8,500,000) (8,500,000) 1.945 1.945 Balance March 31, 2003 $13,484,844 $13,484,944 $13,494,844 1.945 1.945 Yield for the month of February 2003. The Yield for the month of March 2003 was not available as of the date of this report. P I M C O: 7 840 Newport Center Drive state 300 Newport Beach CA 92660 Tel: 949.720.6000 April 7,2003 F.949.720.1376 Mr. Mike White,CPA Controller Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Dear Mike: The following is a description of events in the bond markets during the month of March in addition to an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term and Liquid portfolios over the period. Also included is a section on our outlook and preferred strategies to be pursued in your portfolios during the coming months. Bond Market Recap: General optimism about the outcome of the U.S. war with Iraq drove equities higher and most bonds lower in March, as the S&P 500 index climbed 0.97%, while the Lehman Aggregate Bond Index returned a -0.08%. U.S. Treasury yields generally rose, with the exception of very short maturities, and the yield curve steepened with the 30-year treasury yield rising 0.14%. In this rising rate environment, mortgages trailed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis, with Ginnie Maes and Fannie Maes outperforming the overall Lehman mortgage index while Freddie Mac issues trailed the index. Corporate bonds outperformed Treasuries,with the Lehman Credit index posting a duration-adjusted excess return of 0.37%. Within the corporate sector, telecommunications issues continued to outperform, eaming a duration-adjusted excess return of 2.17%. Similarly, the Lehman High Yield index generated a strong excess return of 3.05%, as high yield spreads tightened in concert with the stock market rally. Internationally, European government bonds suffered losses, and lagged behind U.S. Treasuries. Emerging market bonds continued to benefit from investor search for yield, as the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global gained 1.62% for the month. Increasing investor confidence in the current administration helped drive Brazilian debt to a 6.6%return in March. Economic data releases provided farther evidence that the recovery is running out of steam. Consumer confidence appears to be waning as the University of Michigan's index of confidence fell to 75, the lowest since October 1992, from 79.9 in February. U.S. retail sales fell by the most since November 2001 as Americans bought fewer cars, furniture and building materials. Manufacturing was also constrained as the Institute for Supply Management's factory index fell to 46.2 from 50.5 in February. The war's impact was reflected in consumer prices, which climbed 3% for the 12 months ended in February, compared with a 2.6% increase in the year through January. However, excluding food and energy, prices rose just 1.7% from February 2002, the smallest year-over-year gain since 1966. This string of negative economic releases probably contributed to the FOMC's March 18 decision to leave its target for the federal funds rate unchanged at 1.25%. Mr. Mike White, CPA April 7, 2003 Orange County Sanitation District Page 2 t The domestic bond market performed poorly in Match, posting a negative total return of-0.08% as measured by the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Index (LBAG). In absolute terns, the credit sector was the best performing sector, posting a positive return of 0.07%. The mortgage and Treasury sectors lagged, posting returns of 0.01% and —0.42%, respectively. On a duration- adjusted basis,the credit sector performed best,followed by Treasuries and then by mortgages. Treasury yield changes during the month of March are summarized as follows: • 3-month bills: -8 basis points to 1.11% • 6-month bills: -7 basis points to 1.11% • 2-year notes: -3 basis point to 1.48% • 5-year notes: +5 basis points to 2.71% • 10-year notes: +11 basis points to 3.80% • 30-year notes: +15 basis points to 4.82% Performance Attribution: Long-Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.05 percent for the month of March, underperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 15 basis points. The following points summarize returns for the period ended March 31: • The Long-Term portfolio underperformed the benchmark by 15 basis points for the month but outperformed by 4 basis points for the year-todate period. • Portfolio duration and yield curve positioning were largely neutral for performance. • Holdings of mortgage-backed securities detracted from performance, lagging Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • Corporate holdings were positive for performance,but maintaining an underweight exposure to the sector was negative. Liquid Portfolio The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.15 percent during the month of March, outperforming the 3-month Treasury Bill Index by 5 basis points. The following points summarize returns for the period ending March 31: • The Liquid portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 5 basis points for both the month and the year-todate period. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. Mr.Mike Witte, CPA April 7, 2003 - Orange County Sanitation District Page 3 Oudeek and Strateev: Geopolitical uncertainty could create considerable volatility in financial markets over the next year. Regardless of bow this uncertainty is ultimately resolved, a pre-existing condition of global excess supply is likely to persist and crimp growth. The U.S. economy is likely to expand by 2a/o- 2.5%, while Europe and Japan will be hard pressed to grow at all. Yields on 10-year Treasuries will range between 3.5% and 4.5%, with the potential to pierce the low end of the range if geopolitical circumstances deteriorate, and test the high end if the situation in Iraq is resolved quickly. Key elements of our cyclical forecast include the following: • Remand in the U.S.should hold up better than in other major economies. The weakest part of the U.S.economy - the corporate sector-has pared capital investment, inventories and employees after the excesses of the late 1990s to restore credibility with lenders. This corporate thrift has pressured employment and wages,but it has not dragged down consumption. • Adverse effects on U.S. household income and spending have been and should continue to be mitigated by consumers'ability to monetize housing wealth at mortgage rates near 40-year lows. • The outlook is bleaker in Europe and Japan. In these economies,painful consequences of corporate thrift will not be mitigated by effective reflationary policy such as that provided by the Federal Reserve. Europe is on the bride of recession, as disillusioned investors and skeptical credit rating agencies force balance sheet rehabilitation on compades that lag far behind their American counterparts in cost cutting. Japan will not recover so long as its companies and consumers curtail spending. Japanese companies continue to cut employees where they can and use cash flow to pay down debt. • Rising commodity prices and a weaker dollar will push inflation modestly higher. Higher prices will be good for commodity exporters in the emerging markets,but will impose a negative terms of trade shock on developed economies. PIMCO plans to reduce risk and take exposures where prospects for attractive returns significantly outweigh downside potential. We plan to limit interest rate risk in two ways: by targeting duration near the benchmark and by emphasizing short and long maturities to guard against rising interest rates in overvalued intermediate maturities. In sector strategies,we plan to trim exposures that have recently fared well. Relatively high yields and strong credit quality make mortgages an attractive long-term alternative. Nevertheless, strong recent gains make this sector vulnerable to a correction, so we may moderate mortgage exposure in the short run. We are likely to remain underweight to corporates overall, especially in higher rated bonds with slim credit premiums,and aim for near-to-above index weightings in more attractively priced issues. We look forward to discussing these and other topics with you in the near future. Best regards, Christine Telish, CFA John M. Miller, CFA Vice President Senior Vice President Orange County Sanitation District for the month ending March 31, 2003 Total Return Account-203 With Accrued Interest Wdhout Accrued Interest Market Value 324.983,923 321,935,832 Book Value 316,269,571 313,221.479 Yield to Maturity 2.64 2.66 Short Tenn Account-603 With A=ued Interest Without A=ued Interest Market Value 49,556,310 49,018,811 Book Value 49.768,171 49,230,672 Yield to Maturity 1.51 1.53 MONTHLY REPORT « ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (or the month ended 31 March 2003) Page 1 of I Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.3 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $49,556,310 • Mellon $49,552,057 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $49,768,171 • Mellon 549,766,889 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.32 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact aWlou of 1%Change: $156580 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 50% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No 1 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.15 0.10 3 Months: 0.35 0.30 12 Months: 2.01 1.56 Year-to-Date: 0.35 0.30 Commentary 1 . loaned vales at the shone d oftheykld curve decreasedstighdy duringthe month(3month T-nllls fell busk polmsto 1.11%).while longer annuities Incsemcd(36year Tremurles rose 15 burls polo sto 4.82%). The liquid portfolio wtWamed the benchnerk by 5 bade points fur both the month and the yaaraodae period. PIMCO'semphmtsmhigheryleldingwcudtimwchmcommemktpaperwAshaH noesmoaibutedwperfarmmm. (1)Due to the S15 million cash withdrawal to fund current operations,the account's holding of issuer Federal Home Loan Bank exceeded the 20 percent maximum at 20.10 percent. The position was compliant prior to the cash withdrawal and will be by the end of April 2003. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (or the month ended 31 March 1003) Page I of 3 Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $324,993,923 • Mellon $324,810,327 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $316,269,571 • Mellon $316,533,946 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.29 Of Index: 2.30 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact in/loss of 1%Change: $7 442 132 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repo: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 36% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality., AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 1 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Com lima" No• 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.05 0.20 3 Months: 1.17 1.13 12 Months: 8.88 9.25 Year-to-Date: 1.17 1.13 Threemonlh yields decreaeed duringthe month(90day r-BIW fell 8 basis poinato 1.11%)while ImWmawddalncmaed(5.yem TmmmyNora rose 5 bmb polow to2.71%). • The Iomg-Torn portfolio underperformed the benchmahby 15 basis points for the month but outperformed by4 bare points for the yeariodate period. • Pordblioduranm and yield tuns positioning were largely neutral for perfamrana. • Holdings of Mortgage-backed seouritleadetractodfi mperformance,lagging Tremurieson aduralkn4djunedbuls. • Corpwme holdings were pminw:for perf--oo,bulmelnuiningan undermigntexpou re mum seettrwas uplim MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT EVVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING (for the month ended 31 March 2003) Page 2 of 3 -compliance Issues: $1,600,000 par of United Airlines(UAL)Pass-Through 2001-1-C(909317BC2),6.831%coupon,9/12008 maturity,representing 0.5%of the portfolio holdings on a par Innis was purchased m 8/102001;and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAI (m 9/182001)and S&P from A-to BBB(m 9202001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BAI to BA3(on 12212001)and by S&P from BBB to BB(on 6128/02). Following news of the possible bankruptcy filing,the security was further downgraded in August(B3 Moody's,B+by S&P). On November 29,2002,S&P further downgraded this issue to B,and shortly thereafter on December 9,2002,downgraded the issue one notch Nrther to B-. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. On December 4,2002,the Federal AG Transportation Stabilization Baud(ATSB)rejected UAL$1.5 billion loan guarantee application,citing fundamental flaws with its proposed business plan. In response to the ATSB rejection,the airline submitted its much-anticipated filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on December 0. UAL's filing is the largest bankruptcy ever in the global airline industry,resulting from high costs and low airfares that have plagued the industry since"9/11". The ATSB stated that UAL could submit a revised loan guarantee application in the future or seek a loan guarantee as pan of a Chapter I 1 reorganization. UAL simultaneously renewed its campaign to cut its costs,by announcing it will reduce pay for all officers by about 11%and trim wages for salaried and management employees by 2.8%to 10.7%. UAL will also begin fresh talks with unions about how they will contribute to the cost cutting. UAL said it now has approximately$800 million in unrestricted cash on hand and S600 million in restricted cash. To help the airline meet its bills,the banlruptcyjudge approved an initial$900 million in interim financing,part of the$1.5 billion in debtor-in-possession(DIP)financing the carrier an inged with lenders to see it through the bankruptcy. An additional S700 million of the DIP financing will be available to UAL in the event that it satisfies certain conditions,which include that UAL obtain positive cumulative earnings before interest,taxes,depreciation,amortimtion,and rents(EBITDAR))frmn December 1,2002. Given UAL's cash bum rate and modest cash on hand,the company most take decisive actions to quickly limit its cash bum before the DIP funds have been dissipated. Compared to its competitors,UAL's labor force is extremely unproductive and the bulk of the airline's restructuring efforts should be focused on improving the productivity of its labor force. As part of its capacity reduction plans,UAL will reject,or abandon,aircraft that it does not intend to use in the future. These reductions will be focused on certain older aircraft models,potentially including B727-200a,B767-200s,B747400s,and B737.300s. In addition to rejecting aircraft that it does not intend to utiliu in the future,UAL may also reject aircraft that it would like to utilize. UAL would be incentivized to reject such aircraft if it believes that it will be able to successfully renegotiate the tends of loans and leases on these aircraft. UAL continues to work on cutting costs in order to avoid liquidation and recently reached tentative agreement with its pilots union on a new contract that would save$6.6 billion in labor expenses during the next six years. This savings translates into a$1.12 billion of the$2.56 billion in emus]labor concessions from all of its unions to return to profitability. PIMCO continues to recommend holding the UAL securities,as they expect that negotiations with the company will yield better values than what can currently be achieved in the secondary market Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB in the event of a split rating. •S4,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities($3 million represented by cusip 345397S33 maturing 7/16/04 and St million represented by cusip 345397GV9 manning 5115105),representing 1.2%of the portfolio holdings on a pm basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;and now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade from A2 on l/162002 and m S&P rating of BBB after a further downgrade from BBB+on 10252002. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MYESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ended 31 March 2003) Page 3 of 3 •$7,950,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(cusip 370425QV5 and 37042wEB0),maturing various dates in 2003,represents 2.5%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+,and a further downgrade to BBB occurring on 10/162002;but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A2. •$3,500,000 par of Virginia Electric Power NT securities(cusip 927804EN0),maturing in 2006,represents 1.1%of the portfolio holdings on a per basis. The security was downgraded on 10/212002 by S&P from A-to BBB+,but continues to cany a Moody's rating of A3. G.'1vp.dta[fln13301whee1Tr agMpn147Da0a-03-03.RPT.doc Q U Mellon Trust Report II PAGE: I EASE: usD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-MAR-2003 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINHASS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 3,154,638.66 3,154,638.66 6.37% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 7,708,718.98 7,708,718.88 15.56% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 6,370,679.27 6,370,679.27 12.86% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 7,820,44T72 7,820,447.72 15.78% 0.00 OTHER U.S.GOVT OBLIGATIONS 845,518.61 845,518.61 1.71% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 178,546.39 178,546.39 0.36% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 26,078,549.53 26,079,549.53 52.63% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 26,078,549.53 26,078,549.53 52.63% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 6,251,994.38 6,194,250.00 12.48% -67,734.38 U.S.AGENCIES 9,379,081.35 9,313,449.28 18.80% -65,632.07 BANKING&FINANCE 5,276,887.61 5,210,168.26 10.51% -66,719.35 INDUSTRIAL 1,567,497.81 1,556,541.93 3.14% -10,955.88 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 677,046.50 673,257.00 1.36% .3,789.50 TOTAL UNITED STATES 23,152,497.65 22,937,666.47 46.290/ -214,831.18 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 23,152,497.65 22,937,666.47 46.29% -214,831.18 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 535,941.40 535,941.40 1.08% 0.00 TOTAL 535,841.40 535,941.40 1.08% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 535,841.40 535,841.40 1.08% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO 49,766,808.58 49,552,057A0 100.00% -214,931.18 ASSETS pr- eau © Mellon Trust Report PAGE: 1 BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-MAR-2003 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 6.50 6.50 0.00% 0.00 RECEIVABLES 15,499,154.88 15,498,154.88 4.77°A 0.00 PAYABLES -79,920,519.03 -79,920,519.03 -24.61% 0.00 TOTAL -64,422.357.65 -64,422,357.65 -19.83% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 3,187,904.00 3,187,904.00 0.98% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 36,941,995.00 36,967,131.37 11,39% 25,136.37 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 32,834,616.69 32,934,616.69 10.11% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 17,844,576.25 17,947,027.16 5.49% 2,450.91 MUTUAL FUNDS 12,M,279.19 12,140,279.19 3.74% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 102,949,371.13 102,976,958AI 31.70% 27,587.29 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 38,527,013.48 38,5.54,600.76 1197% 27.587.28 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 89,092,570.88 99,794,11 L09 27.65% 711,540.21 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 14,119,622.69 17,663,88B.73 5.44°A 3,544,266.04 U.S.AGENCIES 43,214,290.34 46,213,756.96 14.23% 2,999,466.62 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 17,399,331.52 17,899,231.94 5.51% 508,900.32 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 5,023,129.66 5,162,809.53 1.59% 139,679.97 FHLMC POOLS 266,541.50 274.554.68 0.09% 8,013.18 FHLMC MULTICLASS 2,799,255.41 2,807,448.87 0.86% 19,193.46 FNMA POOLS 25,933,125.00 25,971,484.50 8,00% 38,359.50 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 2,938,118.80 3,117,976.70 0,96% 279,857.90 ABS:CAR LOAN 144,054.92 141,098.53 0.04% -2,956.39 ABS:AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.00 336,000.00 0.10% -1,264,000.00 BANKING&FINANCE 40,929,999.50 41,466,463.50 12.77% 536,564.00 INDUSTRIAL 17,79Z380.00 17,969,310.00 5.50% 76,930.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 6,438,210.00 7,026,855.00 2.16% 599,645.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 6,594,240.00 6,652,950.00 2.05% 58,710.00 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE BONDS 926,199.84 831,824.80 0.26% 5,624.96 rv¢ e rc Q Mellon Trust Report PAGE' 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-MAR-2003 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINfLOSS TOTAL UNITED STATES 274,979,970.06 293,228,763.73 87.20% 8,248,793.67 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 274M9970.06 293,228,763.73 87.20% 8,248,793.67 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/NECEIVABLES 3,026,962.92 3,026,962.92 0.93% 0.00 TOTAL 3,M962.92 3,026,962.92 0.93% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,026,962.92 3,026,962.92 0.93% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO 316,573,946A6 324.810,327,01 100.00% 8,276.80.9S ASSETS Y IVL 0 YLDIIMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCBF07511102 2003/03/31 RUN DAYS 04/O8/03 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 09.36.44 .....e....................=..........................e.e ....===..................... a PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MEANT TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MAEMST VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ___------- CARE 6 CARS EQUIVALNNTS 1,564,000.00 DO PONT OR NEMOUR DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.915 1,562,678.16 5.99 26354BR83 04/09/2003 1,562,639.16 3.19 500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CA RM CONE STATES! .000 .000 P-1 99.509 497,544.44 1.90 313312FE5 HAT 05/05/2003 A-1+ 497,544.44 1.02 750,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CA BE COMB SYSTEM .000 .COD P-1 99.404 745,531.25 2.05 3133120KO MAT 06/02/2003 A-1+ 345,531.25 1.52 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM6 LN RM CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.003 597,073.61 3.02 313384PN4 NAY 05/21/2003 A-1+ 997,073.61 2.03 1,865,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BR DISCOUNT NT .000 .000 P-1 99.412 1,054,040.02 3.I0 313384GFO MAT 05/30/2003 A-1+ 1,B54,040.02 3.38 500,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN BR CURB DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.450 497,248.33 1.90 313304MO NAT 06/IB/2003 A-1+ 497,248.33 1.01 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BM COMB DIM N .000 .000 P-1 99.399 2,987,986.11 7.62 313384W4 MAT 07/07/2003 A-1+ 1,907,906.11 4.06 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BM CONE DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.364 2,484,099.65 9.52 313304SM0 MAY 07/09/2003 A-1+ 2,404,099.65 5.09 - 500,00D.00 FEDERAL HOM LN HIS COMP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.682 490,411.25 1.91 3133961Q1 MAT 05/15/2003 A-1+ 49B,411.25 1.02 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MW CORD DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.422 4,971,211.11 19.06 313396FM6 MAT 05/22/2003 A-1+ 4,971,111.11 10.14 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN NTO CO" DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.612 996,120.03 3.91 3133960F4 NAY OS/30/2003 A-1+ 996,120.03 2.03 1,700,000.00 FIDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.710 1,695,200.33 6.50 313SOOES0 0.0001 04/23/2003 DO 04/28/02 A-I+ 1,695,200.33 3.46 500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTO ABSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.434 497,371.81 1.90 313508GTS NAY 06/11/2003 A-l+ 497,371.81 1.01 000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ABSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.395 795,156.00 3.04 313590801 RAT 07/02/2003 A-3+ 795,156.00 1.62 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2 OCBF07511102 2003/03/31 RUN DATE 1 D4/08/03 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 1 09.36.44 =v==.........v=vv===..........e==v=====__=====v==.=...====v.........................."=...v..===__.................. PM VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARABT VALUE 0 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.625 99,625.50 .38 36959JT89 06/11/2003 99,625.50 .20 1,500,000.00 GOLDRAN SACRR LP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.489 1,492,335.00 5.72 30142UUIS 07/07/2003 1,492,335.00 3.04 050,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN DISC .000 .000 F-I 99.473 045,518.61 3.24 863872POS MT 05/15/2003 A-14 045,518.61 1.72 170,546.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CARE HURT .000 1.086 AAA 100.000 276,546.39 .68 996095247 AM 178,546.39 .36 3,402,000.00 PEDERAL NAIL MTO ABBN DISC 1.438 .000 P-1 99.440 3,382,951.13 12.97 313598MS 05/07/2003 A-Sf 3,302,951.13 6.90 ________ _______ ----------------- _______-- 1O'TAL CABS 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS .019 .002 26,078,549.53 200.00 26,070,549.53 53.1B PIAED INCOME SECURITIES 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES COUP NOR" SR AT .000 1.600 MI 100.031 1,502,520.00 6.54 046003KNI FLED AT 05/00/2003 DD 05/O0/00 AA- 1,500,465.00 3.06 150,000.00 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC .000 5.672 M3 103.578 677,046.50 2.93 0770SOMI 5.875% 02/01/2004 DD 02/01/94 A. 673,257.00 1.37 200,000.00 COLLATE PALROLIVE RED TR 00058 .000 5.134 AA3 102.640 206,476.00 .89 19416QC94 5.270% 12/01/2003 DD 11/24/96 M- 205,200.00 .42 1,350,000.00 PEDERAL FRAN CA BNB CORE SYSIT .00D 5.224 AAA 103.360 1,399,963.50 6.00 31331B6G7 6.401 01/23/2004 DD 01/01/1999 MA 1,395,354.20 2.05 550,000.00 FEDERAL PARR CA BNB CONS MTN .000 4.907 MA 101.095 565,229.50 2.44 31332RC78 5.000% 10/02/2003 DD 10/02/90 MA 560,424.26 1.14 150,000.00 PRIEM ROSE LN RTG DB06 .000 7.310 AAA 100.764 657,377.50 2.05 3134A3406 7.3751 05/15/2003 DD 04/26/00 AAA 655,097.04 1.34 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTO ABBN DRAB .000 4.959 AAA 103.340 3,321,088.00 14.41 31359WHI 5.125% 02/23/2004 DD 02/08/99 AM 3,306,883.20 6.75 YLDMAL YIELD IALYeIB PAGE , 3 OCSF07511102 2003/03/31 RUN DATE , 04/O6/03 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME , 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TDTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 533,000.00 GENERAL ELEC MTM ITS 00454 .000 0.421 MA 101.062 544,976.51 2.34 36962GUXO 7.500% 06/05/2003 DD 06/0/00 A-2 538,660.46 1.10 250,000.00 GILLRTIE CO HT .000 6.135 RAI IOI.BYS 256,012.50 1.11 375166AC6 6.250% 08/15/2003 DD O9/16/93 AA- 254,602.50 .52 300,000.00 GOLWAN WKS GRP MN ITROOIDD .000 1.SB9 M3 100.00B 300,227.10 1.30 3B141EED7 VAR AT O0/10/2003 DD OB/16/00 A4 300,234.00 .61 500,000.00 PAINS MOSER OROUP INC MRS .000 6.231 RAI 103.515 519,405.00 2.25 695629CE3 6.450% 12/01/2003 DD 12/01/9B M4 517,575.00 1.06 656,000.00 PROCTER 6 OAMBLE CO N78 .000 5.156 M3 101.029 672,278.56 2.91 24231BBK4 5.250E 09/15/2003 DD 09/28/90 M- 667,991.60 1.36 5,800,000.00 U 8 TREASURY BONDS .000 11.133 MA 106.625 6,251,984.38 26.96 912010WO 21.8051 11/15/2003 DD IO/OS/83 MA 6,184,250.00 12.62 425,000.00 VAL MIT BTOREB 1Nc .000 6.446 MI 100.843 432,730.75 1.86 931142AQ6 6.SOOS 06/01/2003 M 429,502.75 .23 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL BOMB LN MN CORD DEW 1.454 4.469 MA 100.690 1,018,200.00 4.39 3134A4FF6 4.5009 06/15/2003 DD 06/15/01 AAA 1,006,B96.B0 2.05 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM M BR CONS BUB 1.513 4.460 AAA 100.896 2,039,880.00 B.39 3133M0SJI 4.5001 07/07/2003 DD O7/05/01 AAA 2,017,917.60 4.12 450,000.00 MILLS FAMO 6 CO SUBNT 1.615 5.957 M3 102.012 467,496.00 2.01 949740BY9 6.1254 11/01/2003 DD 11/02/93 A 462,654.00 .94 150,000.00 "RBML FARM CA =6 CONS MTN 1.664 6.418 AM 102.061 155,796.00 .66 31331NM59 6.550% OB/19/2003 DD 08/19/96 AAA 153,091.05 .31 100,000.00 F6DBRAL ROM LN BR CONS BDS 1.614 5.822 AAA 101.216 103,311.00 .44 3133MSSB2 5.9251 OB/14/2003 DD 08/14/98 AM 101,776.01 .21 1,000,000.00 MOROM STARLEY DM MTN 0=00349 ■.YSY 6.977 AA 102.125 1,045,350.00 4.45 6174SEQN4 0.125% 08/15/2003 DD 08/10/00 AA- 1,021,250.00 2.00 100,000.00 FEDERAL RAIL MN ASSN MTM 1.917 6.683 AAA 100.799 102,765.00 .43 31364CDD0 6.730% 05/21/2003 DD O5/21/96 AAA 100,799.30 .21 540,000.00 MILLS FARGO 6 CO HER, NT 1.949 3.168 M2 100.453 560,601.00 2.36 94974OC85 7.200% 05/01/2003 DD 04/26/00 Aa 542,446.20 1.11 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PASS , 4 OCBF07511102 2003/03/31 RUN DATE , 04/08/03 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIM 1 09.36.44 PM VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARJXT VALUE 8 TOTAL _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 324,000.00 BANRAKERICA COMP SUB NT 2.372 6.814 M3 100.890 336,312.00 1.42 066050BS7 6.875E 06101/2003 DD 06/01/93 A 326,983.60 .67 15,000.00 FEDERAL NONE IN SEE CONS ED 2.751 5.917 AM 101.399 15,470.85 .06 3133M4VC4 6.000E 07/14/2003 DD 07/14/98 AAA 15,209.62 .03 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL PIKED INCOME SECURITIES .203 6.272 23,152,497.65 100.00 22,937,666.47 46.80 ________ _______ ----------------- __-----_- TOTAL •122 3.495 49,231,047.1E IOD.OD 49,016,216.00 10D.00 YLDANM YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 5 MSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE t 04/08/03 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 09.36.44 PAN VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 0 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 15,200,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BR CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.690 15,152,880.00 14.71 313384EKI HAT 04/16/2003 A-1+ 15,152,800.00 3.92 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL ROVE IN BE CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.694 1,495,412.02 1.45 313384ES4 NAT 04/23/2003 A-1+ 1,455,412.00 .39 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL ROVE IN BR CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.095 1,196,284.17 1.16 313394M9 NAT 05/07/2003 A-1+ 1,198,735.08 .31 23,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOM LN NTH CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.996 22,999,169.45 22.33 313396DU4 HAT 04/01/2003 A-1+ 22,999,169.45 5.96 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN HTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.390 997,902.22 .96 313396PY4 MAT 05/23/2003 A-1+ 997.902.22 .26 13,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.110 12,944,923.33 12.59 313396HOI MAT 06/24/2003 A-1+ 12,970,059.70 3.36 17,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL ME ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.996 13,499.358.33 16.99 313508DU6 MAT 04/01/2003 A-la 17,491,350.33 4.53 0,700,DOG.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG A99H DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.473 8,654,172.75 8.40 31358SFP5 HAT 05/14/2003 A-1+ 8,654,172.75 2.24 2,200,000.00 FEDERALL, NAIL MG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.349 2,194,473.11 2.13 31358BORD MAT 06/09/2003 A-1+ 2,194,473.11 .57 4,SOG,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG MEN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.302 4,486,612.50 4.35 313500HRI NET 06/25/2003 A-1+ 4,486,612.50 1.16 3,200r000.00 GENERAL ELBC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.622 3,187,904.00 3.09 36959JTC7 06/12/2003 3,187,904.8D .83 12,140,279.19 DREYPUS TREASURY CASH RUNT .000 1.096 AAA 100.000 12,140,279.19 11.78 996OB5247 AAA 12,140,279.19 3.14 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASK EQUIVALENTS .000 .019 102,949,371.13 100.DO 102,976,950.41 26.60 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF00522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE f 04/08/03 DISTRICT, LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE f 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY BRAME TOTAL COST/ 4 TIM SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ FIX2D INCOME SECURITIES 752,000.00 BIG SUNAR RICA OLD BON USD .000 5.289 110.615 026,199.84 .29 NA2769454 5.850% 01-AUG-2008 831,024.80 .22 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF WIG .000 4.090 AAA 102.281 5,070,312.50 1.00 OIP0S0452 5.000% OS/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 BAR, 5,114,062.50 1.32 15,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF NTG .000 5.336 AAA 104.594 15,314,375.00 5.53 01F0G0444 6.000% 04/01/2019 DO 04/01/03 AAA 15,689,062.50 4.06 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA BY HIS .000 5.805 AAA 103.367 5,140,437.50 1.02 01P060659 6.0008 05/01/2033 DD 05/01/03 AAA 5,168,359.50 1.34 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA 6P MTG .000 6.192 AAA 104.992 10,496,875.00 3.00 OIN062649 6.500% 04/15/2033 DO 04/01/03 AAA 10,497,656.00 2.02 900,OOD.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN 1 TR 00459 .000 1.628 A2 100.240 899,406.00 .31 033928VC4 VAR RT 12/01/2003 DO 08/17/01 A 901,260.00 .23 1,500,000.00 CIE GROUP INC NEW SR HT .000 5.380 A2 102.234 1,527,135.00 .54 125501ADD 5.500% 11/30/2000 DO 12/02/02 A 1,533,510.00 .40 5,000,000.00 CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB NT .000 5.246 AA2 107.234 5,333,600.00 1.89 1]296)BP5 5.6258 08/27/2012 DD 08/26/02 A4 5,361,700.00 1.39 - 196,350.30 DISTRIBUTION PINL 99-1 CL A4 .000 5.089 100.986 200,461.40 .06 2S435MAD6 S.9409 10117/2011 DD 03/28/99 198,089.96 .05 163,140.25 FNLMC GROUP 4G4-0353 .000 7.201 AAA 104.154 167,232.94 .05 3128DBNA2 7.5000 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 AAA 169,925.17 .04 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL SOME LN BE CONS ADS .000 6.462 AAA 110.263 7,997,625.00 2.91 3133NAUN3 0.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 8,269,727.25 2.14 101,743.55 FSLMC GROUP 138-6064 .000 3.733 AAA 102.836 99,263.56 .03 31340SNE3 6.384% 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/90 AAA 104,629.51 .03 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ASSN ONES .000 4.015 BAR 109.035 11,521,271.50 4.36 31359MGX2 5.250E 06/1S/2006 DO 06/22/01 AAA 12,375,502.01 3.20 2,593,603.29 GNMA POOL #0569358 .000 6.198 BAR 105.049 2,654,390.87 .96 3620DOOK3 6.5001 04/15/2032 DO 04/01/02 AAA 2,724,565.21 .31 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t I MSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE f 04/08/03 DISMIM TANG-TERM OPERATING RON TIME 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 413,445.05 GNMA II POOL 40000395 .000 4.410 AAA 102.045 409,690.21 .14 36225CHM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 AAA 421,901.66 .11 3,767,207.21 GNMA II POOL 109040OX .000 4.410 AAA 102.045 3,728,946.51 1.35 36225CH28 6.5001 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 AAA 3,844,231.53 1.00 3,DDD,DDD.00 GTE NORTH INC DEB SER A .000 5.709 Al 103.640 3,063,750.00 1.09 362337AD9 6.000% 01/IS/2004 DD D1/15/94 A4 3,109,200.00 .81 5,000,000.00 GENERAL ELM CAP SIR 4TR 00575 .000 5.205 AAA 104.703 5,203,500.00 1.84 36962G8Y3 5.4501 01/15/2013 DO 12/06/02 A-2 5,235,150.00 1.36 4.000,ODO.DO GENERAL MYER ACCEP HIS 900615 .000 1.604 A2 99.765 3,999,440.00 1.40 31042MEBO VAR RT 08/04/2003 DO 08/03/01 BBB 3,990,600.00 1.03 3,OU0,000.00 GENERAL MMS ACCEP CORP SR HT .000 5.973 A2 102.546 3,064,350.00 1.06 370425SD3 6.125% 09/29/2007 DD O0/29/02 SUB 3,076,38O.OD .80 3,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 8R NT .000 4.018 AA 102.6I1 3,030,03D.00 1.08 38141MS1 4.125% 01/13/2008 DO O1/13/03 A4 3,020,130.00 .60 1,500,000.00 HOUSEHOLD PIN CORD NT .000 5.958 A2 108.828 1,625,940.00 .5I 4418123M5 6.3751 10/15/2011 DD 10/23/01 A 1,632,420.00 .42 3,000,000.00 .3P MORGAN CRASH 6 CO SUB HT .000 5.488 A2 104.I65 3,127,260.00 1.10 46625HAT7 5.2500 01/02/2013 DD 11/25/02 A 3,142,950.00 .81 3,200,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY NT .000 3.640 AAI 99.593 3,195,648.00 1.12 617446BM2 3.625% 04/01/2008 DD 03/06/03 Ai 3,106,976.00 .83 3,000,000.00 RATIONAL BOBBY UTILS COOP FIN .000 6.237 A2 116.234 3,465,480.00 1.23 637432CU7 7.250% 03/01/2012 DD 03/07/02 A 3,487,020.00 .90 5,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC HIS .000 7.27I BMI 103.062 5,263,DD0.00 1.81 718154CHS 7.500% 04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 A- 5,153,100.00 1.33 140,156.82 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.397 AAA 100.672 144,054.92 .04 24046RFM6 6.430% 03/00/2004 OD 06/21/99 141,098.53 .04 3,679,356.91 SBA GM DEV PARTS 2001-20C 1 .000 5.759 AAA 110.000 3,679,356.91 1.43 83162CWO 6.340% 03/01/2022 MA 4,050,236.09 1.05 2,637,657.40 SBA GTD DRAW CTFS SSIC-PS 01 .000 5.998 AM 110.700 2,637,657.40 1.03 63164IDM 6.640% 02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 NR 2,919,086.74 •76 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE B OCBF07522202 2003/03/31 ROM DATE 04/08/03 DISTRICT, LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 09.36.44 vvnvevcvv=vvavvuvumenevvve===vevaaavevmv......vv===v==nveecn=====_=====nvunvn=====___________=====c=========c=c=n=====®m== PAN VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE E TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1 C .000 32.529 B3 21.000 1,600,000.00 .11 909317BC2 6.831E 03/02/2010 DO 00/22/01 A- 336,000.00 .09 20,000,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTES .000 5.467 AAA 114.313 22,620,312.50 8.07 9128272JO 06.250E 02/15/2007 DO 02/15/97 AAA 22,862,500.00 5.92 .00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00 9128274YS 3.875E 01/15/2009 DO O1/15/99 AAA .00 .00 57,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.221 AAA 110.125 62,782,901.47 22.20 9128276N7 05.750E 11/15/2005 DO 11/15/00 AAA 62,881,375.00 16.20 3,000,000.00 VENISON GLOBAL FDG COST GLOBAL .000 6.243 A2 118.125 3,530,490.00 1.25 92344GAT3 7.375E 09/01/2012 DD 00/26/02 A+ 3,543,750.00 .92 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 INN 01 SER A .000 5.298 A3 108.531 3,487,600.00 1.34 927004EN0 5.750E 03/31/2006 DO 03/27/01 BBB+ 3,796,585.00 .98 16,053,520.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.917 3.067 AAA 110.031 14,119,622.69 6.23 9128272M3 3.375E D1/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 AAA 17,663,089.73 4.57 3,950,000.00 GRAC NTS 5.752 1.445 A2 99.671 3,918,768.50 1.39 370425OV5 VAR RT 08/16/2D03 DO 00/17/98 BBB 3,937,004.50 1.02 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 5.801 1.450 Al 100.031 1,992,B00.00 .70 066365DM4 PLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/90 A 2,000,620.00 .52 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DEBS 5.967 6.467 AAA 110.101 16,154,410.00 6.02 31359HFBI 7.125E 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 17,077,980.60 4.42 1,421,839.94 FHLMC MULTICIASS RED PER E3 A 6.316 4.302 ARE 99.319 1,423,354.78 .49 3133WE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/97 AAA 1,412,157.21 .37 1,067,181.72 GNMA DID ETHIC TR 2000-9 PO 6.320 1.770 AAA 100.583 1,067,191.72 .37 3937H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,073,403.39 .28 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.738 A2 100.171 2,031,960.00 .70 013902ANI 6.750E 04/15/2003 A 2,003,420.00 .52 14,511.60 GMA POOL 40500917 6.309 5.731 AAA 104.699 13,774.69 .00 36210SPA0 6.000E 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 15,193.53 .00 52,552.05 GERA POOL #0506636 6.309 5.731 AAA 104.699 49,803.39 .01 36210YYPO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/D1/99 AAA 55,021.59 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 9 OCSPO7522202 2003/03/32 RUN DATE 04/O0/03 DISTRICTS LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME S 09.36.44 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY M ONET TOTAL COST/ R TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE M ONET VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 546,725.30 GNM POOL 10503388 6.389 5.731 AAA 104.695 518,961.97 .20 36210VF55 6.00OS 03/1S/2029 DO 03/01/99 AAA 572,417.20 .15 22,4B1.19 GNM POOL 10499153 6.389 5.331 AAA 104.699 21,345.02 .00 36210QQES 6.000% 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AM 23,544.54 .01 666,417.96 GNM POOL 10496461 6.390 5.031 AM 104.699 632,576.40 .24 36210MQN4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 697,734.41 .10 179,611.98 GNM POOL 60491103 6.390 5.731 AM 104.699 10,541.95 .06 36210MY4 6.0001 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 181,005.35 .05 16,922.07 GNM POOL #0486720 6.390 5.031 MA 104.690 16,062.75 .00 36210AVM6 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AM 17,717.20 .00 32,262.96 GNM POOL #0497343 6.390 5.731 AAA 104.699 30,719.54 .01 362IONP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/99 MA 33,083.77 .01 27,704.88 GNM POOL 10469689 6.391 5.331 AAA 104.699 26,290.00 .01 36209MR8 6.000% 11/15/2020 DD 11/01/99 AM 29,OO6.79 .01 33,319.31 GMM POOL 10467279 6.391 5.731 MA 104.619 31,627.32 .01 36209CCQ3 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 MA 34,905.06 .01 60,958.95 GEM POOL #0457014 6.391 5.02I AAA 104.I62 57,863.37 .02 36208Q983 6.000% 10/15/2020 DD 10/01/99 AAA 63,861.64 .02 622,401.19 GNM POOL #0467286 6.301 5.331 AAA 104.691 590,794.88 .23 362D9CCK2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/99 AM 651,649.19 .17 742,239.17 OHM POOL #0465555 6.392 5.727 AM 104.162 704,547.35 .27 36209M40 6.000% 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/90 MA 777,502.52 .20 25,020.45 GNM POOL /0483452 6.392 S.327 MA 104.I62 24,509.25 .00 36209MBV3 6.000% 09/15/202B DD 09/01/98 AM 27,049.95 .01 723,417.09 GNM POOL #0465546 6.392 5.727 AM 104.I62 686,681.07 .26 36209AET3 6.000% 00/15/2020 DD O0/01/90 AAA 757,864.19 .20 629,734.39 OHM POOL 10468339 6.392 5.727 AAA 104.762 591,755.71 .23 36209DEQ0 6.0001 08/15/2028 DO O0/01/98 AAA 659,320.58 .17 36,396.45 GNM POOL 10438057 6.393 5.727 AM 104.762 34,548.20 .01 3620IPTN9 6.000% 05/15/2029 OD 05/01/9B AM 39,129.55 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 10 O SM7522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE t 04/08/03 DISTRICTt LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 09.36.66 PAR VALUE YTM AT CONSENT MDODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MAANST VALUE 9 TOTAL ----------------- _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ______-___ 32,209.75 DONA POOL 10469330 6.393 5.727 AAA 104.762 30,574.09 .01 36209DEP6 6.0001 O5/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 AAA 33,743.49 .01 1,364,294.80 PNLNC NULTICLASO CTP III A6 6.696 6.356 AAA 102.272 1,366,90D.63 .69 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2010 AAA 1,395,291.66 .36 2,BB1,58I.83 TELMC MULTICLASS CTP BEE 16201 6.499 5.632 AAA 106.526 2,729,661.69 1.00 3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DD 11/01/93 AAA 3,072,029.64 .80 1,000,000.00 SALOMON eB BLOW ME 6.625 1.599 AA 100.015 1,000,000.00 .35 79568EEE8 VAR AT 04/20/2003 DD 06/2B/00 AA- 11000,150.00 .26 516,528.07 ONMA II POOL 10BOOBBM 6.705 5.211 AAA 103.147 527,827.12 .18 3622WC20 7.375% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 532,7B1.16 .16 2,000,000.00 MAREN 6 MCLENNAN COB INC 8R MT 6.717 6.252 A2 105.968 1,992,280.00 .74 571710AB0 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 2,219,360.00 .55 3,000,000.00 FORD ME CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.573 A3 101.931 2,995,080.00 1.07 365397SJ3 6.7009 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 BBB 3,050,110.00 .79 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE BONE LN6 INC NT 6.866 6.666 A3 105.937 2,490,400.00 .93 22237UMB 6.0500 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,66B,625.00 .69 350,846.91 DORA II POOL /0000023 6.992 5.623 AAA 103.719 356,657.62 .12 36225CA39 VAR AT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 363,094.20 .09 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MIO ASSN DEW 7.113 5.660 AM 117.466 2,030,133.00 .07 31359MEYS 6.625% 09/15/2009 OD 09/01/99 AAA 2,666,708.31 .66 794,073.05 GEEYSTORE SVCG CORD FDA 095-7 7.566 6.931 AAA 107.194 783,261.24 .30 39810/AE6 7.630% 06/01/2023 DO 02/29/00 AAA B52,059.56 .22 2,000,000.00 POND MOTOR CR CO MT 7.592 6.750 A3 100.000 965,170.00 .35 3653970V9 6.750E 05/15/2005 DO 05/24/93 BEN 1,000,000.00 .26 952,656.49 VM/BUNTOON PAIRS 1000-111SO 7.686 6.967 AAA 107.643 931,965.99 .36 302998GE3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 1,025,466.22 .27 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP OECD MTN 1TO 00115 7.709 6.786 A3 107.609 2,950,530.00 1.13 69512ESU5 7.300% 10/22/2004 DO 30/22/92 A 3,220,270.00 .06 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 11 MSF07522202 2003/03/31 RUN DATE 04/08/03 DISTRICTi LONG-TRAM OPERATING RUN TI4@ U9.36.44 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NODDY NARNET TOTAL CCBT/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE NARAET VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 7.967 7.049 Al 111.71E 1,594,032.00 .63 020002AL5 7.875E 05/01/2005 DD OS/01/00 Al 1,787,480.00 .46 -------- _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES .001 5.207 274,979,970.06 100.00 283,228,763.73 73.39 TOTAL .760 5.017 377,929,341.19 100.00 386,205,722.14 100.00 Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 REPS DISTRIBUTION 19-Ma-2003 -15,000,000.00 NA9123459 TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 0.00 CW 19-Mer-2003 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-De 2002 4,971,111.11 313396FX6 MAT 05222003 13-Dec-2002 -4,971,111.11 BC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-1)eo-2002 4,971,111.11 313396FX6 MAT 05222003 13-Dec-2002 0.00 FCC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13-1)eo-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-De 2002 -4,971,111.11 313396FX6 MAT 05222003 13-Dec-2002 4,971,111.11 B LEHMAN GONT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 12-Dec-2002 -4,971,111.11 313396FX6 MAT 051222003 13-De 2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13-Dec-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,865,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK DISCOUNT 16-1)w2002 1,854,040.02 313394GFO MAT05/30/2003 17-D.2002 -1,854,040.02 BC CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC 0.00 08-Apr-1003 11:11:43 EsecuHve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARL91PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIrrION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,865,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK DISCOUNT 16-Dec-2002 1,854,040.02 313394GFO MAT 05/30/2003 17-Dec-2002 0.00 FCC CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC 17-De 2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,865,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK DISCOUNT 16-De 2002 -1,854,040.02 313384GFO MAT 05/302003 17-Dec-2002 1,854,040.02 B CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,865,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK DISCOUNT 16-Dec-2002 .1,854,040.02 313384GFO MAT05/302003 17-Dec-2002 0.00 FC CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC 17-Dec-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -750,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 20-Dec-2002 745,531.25 313312GKO MAT 06/032003 20-De 2002 -745,531.25 BC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -750,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 20.Dec-2002 745,531.25 313312GKO MAT 06/032003 20-Deo-2002 0.00 FCC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20-Dec-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 20-Dec-2002 497,544.44 313312FE5 MAT 05/052003 20-Deo2002 -497,544.44 BC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 20-Dco-2002 497,544.44 313312FE5 MAT 05/052003 20-Dec-2002 0.00 FCC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20-Dec-2002 0.00 08-Apr2003 11:11:43 Executive Wwkbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: -3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 20-Dco-2002 -497,544.44 313312FE5 MAT 05/052003 20-De 2002 497,544.44 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 20-Dec-2002 -497,344.44 313312FE5 MAT 05/052003 20-Dec-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20-Dec-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 750,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 20-Dec-2002 -745,531.25 3133120KO MAT 06/032003 20-1)Co2002 745,531.25 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 750,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 20-Dec-2002 -745,531.25 313312GKO MAT 06/032003 20-De 2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 20-De 2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 13-Jm-2003 497,249.33 313384HAO MAT 06/182003 13-Jm-2003 -497,248.33 BC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 13-Jm-2003 497,248.33 313384HAO MAT06/182003 13.1m-2003 0.00 FCC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 13-1M-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 13-Jm-2003 497,248.33 313384HAO MAT 06/182003 13-1M-2003 497,248.33 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Fwmtiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK.CONS DISC 13-Jw-2003 497,248.33 313394HAO MATOWIM003 13-Jan-2003 OAO FC MORGAN STANLEY&.CO INC,NY 13-Ian-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 15-Jam2003 1,987,986.11 313384HV4 MAT 07/072003 15-Jan-2003 -1,997,996.11 BC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 154an-2003 1,987,986.11 313384HV4 MAT 07/072003 15-Ian-2003 0.00 FCC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 15-Ian-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 15-Jan-2003 -1.987,986.11 313384HV4 MAT 07/072003 15-Jan-2003 1,987,986.11 B BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 15-Je0-2003 -1,987,986.11 313384HV4 MAT 07/072003 15-Jan-2003 0.00 PC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 15-Ian-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05-Feb-2003 1,195,345.00 3133%GF4 MAT 05/302003 05-Feb-2003 -1,195,345.00 BC DAIN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 05-Feb-2003 1,195,345.00 313396GF4 MAT 05/302003 05-Feb-2003 0.00 FCC DAIN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 05-Feb-2003 0.00 i 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Eeeeaflve{Pwkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITYm TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05-Feb-2003 -1,195,345.00 313396GF4 MAT 0513012D03 05-Feb-2003 1,195,345.00 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05-Feb-2003 -1,195,345.00 313396GF4 MAT 05/302003 05-Feb-2003 0.00 FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 05-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 394,395.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-My-2003 -394,395.45 996085247 03-My-2003 394,395.45 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 394.395.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-My-2003 -394,395.45 996085247 03-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 03-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 MMNSTA MNG&MFG DISC 03-My-2003 -1,499,923.75 60406BQQ5 0324/2003 03-My-2003 1,499,923.75 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 MMNSTA MNG&MFG DISC 03-My-2003 -1,498,923.75 60406BQQ5 03242003 03-My-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 03-My-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-My-2003 -1,400,000.00 99402M594 01.320%03/042003 DO 03/031 03-My-2003 1,400,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 &,mtm Workbench Q Mellon Truat-Sam Ie Report PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Mu-2003 -1,400,000.00 99402M594 01.320%03/04/2003 DO 03/03/ 03-Mu-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 03-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,045.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Mu-2003 -10,045.62 996085247 04-Mu-2003 10,045.62 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,045.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Mar-2003 -10,045.62 996085247 04-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 04-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 232.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Mu-2003 -232.77 996085247 04-Mu-2003 232.77 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 232.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Mu-2003 -232.77 996095247 04-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 04-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,648.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCf 04-Mu-2003 -54,648.00 996087094 04-Mu-2003 54,649.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,900,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 04-Mu-2003 -5,900,000.00 99402N766 01.250%03/05/2003 DD 03/04/ 04-Mu-2003 5,900,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 08-4pr 2003 11:11:43 Erecuriw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE, 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,900.000-00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 04-Mar-2003 -5,900,000.00 99402N766 01.250%03/052003 DD 03/04/ 04-Mar-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 04-M"-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,648.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Mu-2003 -54,648.00 996085247 05-Mar-2003 54,648.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,649.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Mar-2003 -54,648.00 996095247 05-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 05-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 25,529.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Mar-2003 -25,529.94 996095247 07-Mar-2003 25,529.94 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 25,529.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Mar-2003 -25,529.94 996085247 07-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 07-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,636.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Mar-2003 -26,636.66 996095247 10-Mar-2003 26,636.66 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,636.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Mar-2003 -26.636.66 996085247 106Ma 20M 0.00 FC 10-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 P-recufm Workbench Q MelloD Tmst-Sample Re ort PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000o10000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADEDATU AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 10-Mu-2003 -1,500,000.00 99402U034 01.210%03/112003 DD 03/101 10-Mm-2003 1,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 10-Mm-2003 -1,500,000.00 99402U034 01.210%03/112003 DD 03/10/ 10-Mm-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 10-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 738.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Mm-2003 -739.75 996085247 11-Mm-2003 738.75 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 738.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Mm-2003 -738.75 9%085247 11-Mm-2003 0.00 FC I I-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 PITNEY BOWES INC DISC 11-Mu-2003 -1,499,311.67 72447TQRO 03252003 11-Mm-2003 1,499,311.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 PITNEY BOWES INC DISC II-Mm-2003 -1,499,311.67 72447TQRO 03252003 ll-Me 2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 11-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Mu-2003 -37.500.00 996085247 13-Mm-2003 37,500.00 B 0.00 08-Apn2003 11:1L43 Exeeulim wAbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: •9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION) SETTL DATEJ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Mar-2003 -37,500.00 996085247 13-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 13-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,276,286.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Mar-2003 4,276,286.62 996085247 14-Mar-2003 4,276,286.62 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,276,286.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Mar-2003 -4,276,286.62 996085247 14-Mar-2003 0.00 PC 14-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,668,863.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Mar-2003 -3,669,863.04 996085247 17-Mar-2003 3,668,863.04 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,668,863.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Mar-2003 -3,669,963.04 996095247 17-Mar-2003 0.00 PC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Mar-2003 -5,400,000.00 99403AI93 01.320%03/18/2003 DO 03/17/ 17-Mar-2003 5,400,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-Mar-2003 -5,400,000.00 99403A193 01.320°A 03/18/2003 DD 031171 17-Mar-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC,NY 17-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 0I-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURFTY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 198.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Mar-2003 -198.00 996085247 18-Mar-2003 198.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 198.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT IS-Mar-2003 -198.00 996085247 IB-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 18-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO I8-Mar-2003 -5,400,000.00 99403C272 01.190%03/192003 DO 031181 18-Mar-2003 5,400,000.00 B LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO IS-Mar-2003 -5,400,000.00 99403C272 01.190%03/192003 DO 03/18/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 18-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP CIS 18-Mar-2003 3,898,820.25 313396DP5 MAT 03272003 18-Mu-2003 3,898,920.25 B LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS I8-Mar-2003 -3,899,820.25 313396DP5 MAT 03272003 18-Mar-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY I8-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 541,865.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Mar-2003 -541,865.09 996095247 19-Mar-2003 541,865.09 B 0.00 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 F. calive wkb,mh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 541,965.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Mu-2003 -541,865.09 996095247 19-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 19-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,671.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-14u-2003 -100,671.11 996095247 20-Mu-2003 100,671.11 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,671.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Mu-2003 -100,671.11 996095247 20-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 20-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 78,041.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-My-2003 -78,041.10 996095247 20-Mu-2003 78,041.10 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 78,041.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-My-2003 .78.041.10 996085247 20-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 20-Ma 2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 20-Mu-2003 -997,902.22 313396FY4 MAT 05/232003 20-My-2003 997,902.22 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 20-Mu-2003 -997,902.22 313396FY4 MAT 05232003 20-My-2003 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 20-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Ewmfive Wo kbneh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIrTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 281,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Mer-2003 -281,000.00 996085247 21-Mar-2003 281,000.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 281,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Mar-2003 -281,000.00 996085247 21-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 21-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,249.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Mar-2003 -3,249.73 996085247 21-Mer-2003 3,249.73 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,249.73 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Ma 2003 -3,249.73 996085247 21-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 21-Mar-2003 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 2,083,188.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Mar-2003 -2,083,188.89 996085247 24-Mar-2003 2,083,188.89 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,083,188.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Mar-2003 -2,093,188.89 996085247 24-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 24-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID 6PER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 24-Mar-2003 -999,487.50 26354BR87 04/08/2003 24-Mar-2003 999,487.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Fi m iw Wwkbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Re ort PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 24-Mar-2003 -999,487.50 26354BR87 04/09/2003 24-Mar-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 24-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 25-Mar-2003 -2,194,473.11 313588GRO MAT 06/09/2003 25-Mar-2003 2,194,473.11 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 25-Met-2003 -2,194,473.11 313588GRO MAT 061D92003 25-Met-2003 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 25-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Mar-2003 ,600,000.00 996085247 26-My-2003 600,000.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Mar-2003 -600,000.00 996085247 26-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 26-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 27-Mar.2003 4,496,612.50 313588HHI MAT 0625/2003 27-Mar-2003 4,486,612.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 27-Mar-2003 4,486,612.50 313588HH1 MAT 06252003 27-Mar-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 27-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 Executive Wwktemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE. /4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 175.868.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Mu-2003 -175,869.87 996085247 28-Mu-2003 175,868.87 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 175,868.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Mu-2003 -175,868.87 996085247 28-Me-2003 0.00 FC 28-Mm-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Mu-2003 -35,000,000.00 99403N294 01.2 70-4 0313 1/2003 DO 03/28/ 28-Mu-2003 35,000,000.00 B LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Mar-2003 -35,000,000.00 99403N294 01.270%03/31/2003 DD 0328/ 28-Mu-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 28-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Mar.2003 -16,998,229.17 313588DT9 MAT 03/312003 28-Mar-2003 16,998,229.17 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Mu-2003 -16,998,229.17 313588DT9 MAT 03/312003 28-Mu-2003 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 28-Mm-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,612,379.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Mar-2003 -11,612,379.97 996085247 31-Mu-2003 11,612,379.97 B 0.00 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 Eecullve Wo kbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocs0000lmm 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE1 AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,612,379.97 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-Mar-2003 -11,612,379.97 9%085247 31-Mm-2003 0.00 FC 31-Mar-2003 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 31-Mar-2003 -17.499,358.33 313588DU6 MAT 04/012003 31-Mar-2003 17,499,358.33 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 31-Mar-2003 -17.499,358.33 313588DU6 MAT 04/012003 31-MM-2003 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO MG NY 31-Mar-2003 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP CIS 31-Mar-2003 -19,999,277.78 313396DU4 MAT 04/012003 31-Mar-2003 19,999,277.78 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 31-Mar-2003 -19,999,277.79 313396DU4 MAT 04/012003 31-Mar-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN DOW SECS MC,NY 31-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP CIS 31-Mar-2003 -2,999,891.67 313396DU4 MAT 04/012003 31-Mar-2003 2,999,891.67 B LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP CIS 31-Mar-2003 -2,999,891.67 313396DU4 MAT 04/012003 31-Mar-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 31-Mm-2003 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 Emcuriw Workbench Q Me11oD Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCED-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAPULOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Feb-2003 -5,162,500.00 0IF060634 6.00016 0 3101/2 0 3 3 DO 03101/ 13-Mar-2003 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 13-MU-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 3,104,062.50 0IF052433 5.500%03/012018 DO 03/011 18-Mat-2003 -3,104,062.50 BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,0D0.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 -6,273,750.00 0IF060436 6.000%03/012018 DO 03/011 19-Ma-2003 0.00 PC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 18-Mm-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 -3,137,812.50 0IF060436 6.0001/603/012018 DO 03/01/ IS-Me-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS MG NY 18-Mm-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2D03 -6,275,625.00 0IF060436 6.00D%03/01/2018 DO 03/011 18-Mu-2003 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 18-Mar-2003 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 828,044.80 FNMA POOL 80555014 12-Feb-2003 -956,767.60 31385WSB6 5.500%IMI20I7DDI0/0I/ 18-Mat-2003 856,767.60 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 928,044.80 FNMA POOL80555014 12-Feb-2003 -2,150.62 31385WSB6 5.50D%11/012017 DO 10/011 18-Mar-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 E .tm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Re ort PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO $28,044.80 FNMA POOL#0555014 12-Feb-2003 -858,919.22 31385WSB6 5.500%11/01/2017 DO 10/01/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 354,257.59 FNMA POOL#0609665 12-Feb-2003 -366,545.90 31388NJJ6 5.500%11/01/2016DD I Il01/ IB-Mar-2003 366,545.90 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 354,257.59 FNMA POOL#0609665 12-Feb-2003 -920.09 31388N116 5.500Yv 11/012016 DD 11/011 1B-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 354,257.59 FNMA POOL#0609665 12-Feb-2003 -367,465.99 31388N116 5.500%11/012016 DO 11/01/ 18-Mu-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 356,135.02 FNMA POOL#0660867 12-Feb-2003 368,498.45 31391AFG9 5.500%01/012018D13011011 18-My-2003 368,498.45 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 356,135.02 FNMA POOL#0660867 12-Feb-2003 -924.96 31391AFG9 5.50091.01/012018DD01/01/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 356,135.02 FNMA POOL#0660867 12-Feb-2003 -369,413.41 31391AFG9 5.500%01/012018 DO 01/01/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Mu-2003 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 304,697.80 FNMA POOL#0660867 12-Feb-2003 -315,256.66 31391AFG9 5.500%01/01/2018DD01/01/ 18-Mar-2003 315,256.66 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 304,687.90 FNMA POOL#0660867 12-Feb-2003 -791.34 31391AFG9 5.500%01/01/2018 DD 01/011 18-Mar-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 304,687.80 FNMA POOL#0660867 12-Feb-2003 ,316,048.00 31391AFG9 5.500%01/012018DD01/01/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 171,855.94 FNMA POOL#0665915 12-Feb-2003 -177,817.19 31391FYL6 5.500%10/012017 DD 10/01/ 18-Mar-2003 177,817.19 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 171,855.94 FNMA POOL#0665915 12-Feb-2003 446.35 31391FYL6 5.500%10/0 12 01 7 DO 10/011 18-Mar-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 171,855.94 FNMA POOL#0665915 12-Feb-2003 -179,263.54 31391FYL6 5.500%10/012017 DO 101011 18-Mar-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 643,765.48 FNMA POOL#0669293 12-Feb-2003 -666,096.10 31391KRN9 5.500%11/012017 DD 10/011 18-Mu-2003 666,096.10 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 08-Apr-1003 11:11:43 Executive Wwkbewh� Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 643,765.48 FNMA POOL#0669293 12-Feb-2003 -1,672.00 31391KRN9 5.500%11/0112017DD 101011 18-Mm-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 643,765.48 FNMA POOL80669293 12-Feb-2003 -667,768.10 31391KRN9 5.500%11/01/2017 DO 10/01/ IS-Mar-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 20-MU-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 340,955.19 FNMA POOLN0622460 12-Feb-2003 -352,782.07 31389DQM2 5.500%12/01/2016 DO 12/01/ 18-MU-2003 352,792.07 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 340,955.19 FNMA POOL#0622460 12-Feb-2003 -885.54 31389DQM2 5.500%12/01/2016 DO 12/01/ IS-Mu-2003 0.00 IB 0,00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 340,955.19 FNMA POOLA0622460 12-Feb-2003 -353,667.61 31389DQM2 5.5001/.12/01/2016 DO 12/011 18-My-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 21-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF bITG I8-Feb-2003 -2,100,000.00 OIN062631 6.500%03/15/2033 DO 03/01/ 20-Mu-2003 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 20-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Feb-2003 -8,400,000.00 OIN062631 6.500^/e 03/15/2033 DO 03/01/ 20-Mar-2003 0.00 PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 20-Mu-2003 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 ae .tPo Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCED-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GABWLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY NT 03-Mar-2003 -3,195,648.00 617446HW2 3.625%04/01/2008 DD 031061 06-Mar-2003 3,195,648.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY NT 03-Mm-2003 -3,195,648.00 617446HW2 3.625%04/012008 DO 03/061 06-Mar2003 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 06-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PD4CO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BKS CONS BDS 04-Mar-2003 -2,025,400.00 3133MKFC6 3.125%11/14/2003 DO 12/03/ 05-Mar-2003 2,025,400.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BUS 04-Mar-2003 -19,097.22 3133MKFC6 3.125Ye 11/142003 DD 121031 05-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BUS 04-Mar-2003 -2,044,497.22 3133MKFC6 3.125%11/142003 DD 12/03/ 05-Mar-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 05-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEBS 04-Mar-2003 -4,554,308.00 3134A4CQ5 6.375%11/152003 DO 11/17M 05-Mm2003 4,554,308.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEBS 04-Mar-2003 -95,708.34 3134A4CQ5 6,373%11/152003 DO 11/1710 05-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Emmin Wo kkmh� Q Mellon Trust-Sam le R ort PAGE: 2/ PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PMICO 4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEBS 04-Mu-2003 -4,640,016.34 3134A4CQ5 6.375%11/152003 DO1 AVO 05-Mu-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 05-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04-Mu-2003 -2,025,360.00 31359MLR2 3.125%11/152003 DO 1123/0 05-Mu-2003 2,025,360.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04-Mu-2003 -19,097.22 31359MLR2 3.1259%11/152003 DO 112310 05-Mu-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATI,MTG ASSN 04-Mu-2003 -2,044,457.22 31359MLR2 3.125%1 I/IS/2003 DD 1123/0 05-Mu-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 05-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF WTG 04-14u-2003 5,194,375.00 0IF060642 COW%04/012033 DD 04/011 14-Apr2003 5,184,375.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 650,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEBS 06-Mu-2003 -657,377.50 3134A34H6 7.375%051152003 DD 052610 07-Mu-2003 657,377.50 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 650,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEBS 06-Mu-2003 -14,913.89 3134A34H6 7.375%05/152003 DO 05/26/0 07-Mu-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 Ecee Wwkburcb Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00G00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PBNCO 650,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG DEBS 06-Mar-2003 -672,291.39 3134A34H6 7.375%05/152003 DO 052610 07-Mar-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 07-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Mer-2003 -2,055,937.50 0IF050445 5.000%04/01/2018 DO 04/011 21-Apr-2003 2,055,937.50 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Mar-2003 -3,083,906.25 0IF050445 5.000%04/012018 DO 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 3,093,90625 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 6,286,875.00 0IF060444 6.000%0 4/012 0 18 DO 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 6,286,975.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 -3,142,500.00 0IF060444 6.000%04/012019 DO 041011 21-Apr-2003 3,142,500.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 6,285,000.00 0IF060444 6.00D%04/01/2018 DO 04A1/ 21-Apr-2003 6,285,000.00 B EK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PBACO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MM 14-Mar-2003 -2,099,375.00 OIN062649 6.500%0411512033 DO 041011 23-Apr-2003 2,099,375.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11::11:43 Executive Workbench^ Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COS I TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Mar-2003 -8,397,500.00 OING62649 6.500%04/15/2033 DO 04/01/ 23-Apr-2OD3 8,397,500.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 20-My-2003 -3,042,187.50 0IF050452 5.000%05/01/2018 DO 051011 19-May-2003 3,042,187.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTO 20-Mar-2003 -2,028,125.00 0IF050452 5.000°A 05/01/2018 DD 051011 19-May-2003 2,028,125.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 25-My-2003 -5,149,437.50 0IF060659 6.000%05/012033 DO 051011 14-May-2003 5,148,437.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT 27-Mar-2003 4,527,135.00 125581ADO 5.5001/6 11/302007 DD 12MY 01-Apr-2003 1,527,135.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT 27-Mar-20D3 -27,270.83 125581ADO 5.500%11/302007 DD 12/021 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 27-Mar-2003 -1,625,940.00 4418123W5 6.375%10/152011 DO 1023/ 01-Apr-2003 1,625,940.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 Executive Warkbeack Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDArED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FM CORP NT 27-Mu-2003 -44,093.75 4418123W5 6.375%10/15/2011 DO 10/231 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 1P MORGAN CHASE&CO SUB NT 27-Mar-2003 -3,127,260.00 46625HAT7 5.750%01/022013 DO 11.125/0 01-Apr-2003 3,127,260.00 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC.SAN 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 IF MORGAN CHASE&CO SUB NT 27-Mu-2003 -60,375.00 46625HAT7 5.750%01/022013 DO 11/25/0 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN BTR 005 27-Mu-2003 -5,203,500.00 36962GZY3 5.450%01/152013 DO 12W 01-Apr-2003 5,203,500.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN 4TR 005 27-Mu-2003 -97,049.61 36962GZY3 5.450%01/15/2013 DO 12/06/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,0X00 NATIONAL RURAL UTIL.S COOP FI 27-Ma 2003 -3,465,480.00 637432CU7 7.250%03/012012 DO 03/07/ 01-Apr-2003 3,465,480.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL UTILS COOP FI 27-Mu-2003 -I8,123.00 637432CU7 7,250°%03/012012 DO 03/07/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Executive Wwkberuh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,00g000.00 CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB NT 27-MU-2003 -5,333,600.00 1729678PS 5.625%08272012 DO 08/26/0 01-Apr-2003 5,333,600.00 B CITIGROUP GBL MKTS/SALOMON, 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 CITIGROUP INC GLOBAL SUB NT 27-Mu-2003 -26.562.50 172%7BP5 5.625%08272012 DO 0812610 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR N 27-Mu-2003 -3,064,350.00 370425SD3 6.125%08282007 DO OS29/ 01-Apr-2003 3,064,350.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR N 27-Mar-2003 -16,843.75 370425SD3 6.125%0828/2007 DO 0829/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 VERIZON GLOBAL FOG COPP GLOB 27-Mer-2003 -3,530,490.00 92344GAT3 7.375%09/012012 DO 0826/ 01-Apr-2003 3,530,490.00 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 VERIZON GLOBAL FOG CORP GLOB 27-Mu-2003 -18,437.50 92344GAT3 7,375%09/012012 DO 0826/ 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 752,000.00 AIG SUNAMERICA GLO BDS USD 27-Mu-2003 -826,199.84 NA2789454 5.850%01-AUG-2009 01-Apr-2003 826,199.84 B A13N AMRO SECS LLC,NEW YORK 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Ereculha Wa kbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 752,000.00 AIG SUNAMERICA GLO EDS USD 27-Mar-2003 -7,332.00 NA2789454 5.850%01-AUG-2008 01-Apr-2003 0.00 IS a.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Jun-2003 3.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 01-Jan-2003 -3.50 PUC 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Jan-2003 3.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/25/2032 DO 12/0U 01-Jan-2003 0.00 FCC 17-Jan-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Jan-2003 -3.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/152032 DO 12/01/ 01-Jan-2003 3.50 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 105,990.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-]an-2003 -105,990.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 154an-2003 105,990.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 105,990.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Im-2003 -105,990.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 01/15/ 1S-Jan-2003 0.00 FC 31-Mu-2003 0.00 08-Apr 2003 11:11:43 Eeecudw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOI/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SEE E3 01-F6.2003 3.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08IM032 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 3.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6.50 FHLMC MUL11CLASS MTG SER E3 01-Mar-2003 -6.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 0 811 5203 2DD 12/011 01-Mer-2003 6.50 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MIG SER E3 01-Mer.2003 .6.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DO 12/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 PC 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,351.21 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 01-Mu-2003 -14,351.2I 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 1110119 01-Mer-2003 14,351.21 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,351.21 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 01-Mu-2003 -14,35121 31331`17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11101/9 01-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 19-Mar-2003 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,036,890.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Mar-2003 1,036,890.40 996085247 03-Mer-2003 -1,036,990.40 S 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Ec the Workbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE- 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,036,890.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Mu-2003 1,036,890.40 996085247 03-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 03-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Mu-2003 1,400,000.00 99402M594 01.320%03/04/2003 DO 03/031 04-Mu-2003 -1,400,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Mu-2003 51.33 99402M594 01.320%03/04/2003 DO 03/03/ 04-Mu-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Mu-2003 1,400,051.33 99402M594 01.320%03/0412003 DO 03/031 04-Mu-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 04-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 04-Mu-2003 399,652.78 313588CXI MAT 03/11/2003 05-Mu-2003 -399,652.78 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Mu-2003 268.55 313588CXI MAT 03/11/2003 05-Mu-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Mu-2003 399,921.33 313588CXI MAT 03/11/2003 05-Mu-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 05-Mu-2003 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Erecud.Wwkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocs000010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Mar-2003 698,517.36 313588EK7 MAT 04/162003 05-Mar-2003 -698,517.36 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-My-2003 494.47 31358SEKI MAT 04/162003 05-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Mer-2003 699,011.83 313588EK7 MAT 04/162003 05-Mar-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 05-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -550,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Mar-2003 547,656.39 313588DF9 MAT 03/192003 05-Mar-2003 -547,656.39 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -550,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Mm-2003 2,089.09 313588DF9 MAT 03/192003 05-My-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -550,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-My-2003 549,745.47 313588DF9 MAT 03/192003 05-Mar-2003 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 05-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -505,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-My-2003 503,787.58 313588CTO MAT 03/072002 05-Mar-2003 -503,787.58 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 E..Iiw Wgkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -505,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Mar-2003 1,179.31 313598CTO MAT 03/07/2002 05-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -505,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 04-Mer-2003 504,966.89 313588CT0 MAT 03/07/2002 05-Met-2003 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 05-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,648.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 05-Mer-2003 54,648.00 996087094 05-Mar-2003 -54,648.00 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -75,172.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-My-2003 75,172.84 996095247 05-Mu-2003 -75,172.84 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -75,172.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Mar-2003 75,172.84 996085247 05-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 05-My-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,900,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 05-Mar-2003 5,900,000.00 99402N766 01.250%03/052003 DD 03/04/ 05-Mer-2003 -5,900,000.00 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,900,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 05-Mer-2003 204.86 99402N766 01.250%03/052003 DO 03/04/ 05-Ma-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 06-Ap,2003 11:11:43 Erecuum Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,900,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 05-Mar-2003 5,900,204.86 99402N766 01.250Yo 03/05/2003 DD 03/04/ 05-Ma 2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 05-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 05-Mar-2003 99,673.75 313312DT40 MAT 03/21/2003 05-Mar-2003 -99,673.75 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 05-Mm-2003 273.91 313312DHO MAT 03/21/2003 05-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 05-Mar-2003 99,947.56 313312DHO MAT 03/21/2003 05-Mar-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 05-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -497,373.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Mu-2003 497,373.00 996085247 06-Mar-2003 497,373.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 497,373.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Mar-2003 497,373.00 996085247 06-Mar-2003 0.00 PC 06-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 06-Mar-2003 2,688,570.00 313588DN2 MAT 03/26/2003 06-Ma 2003 -2,688,570.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Erecurlve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2.700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 06-Mar-2003 9,705.00 313588DN2 MAT 03/26/2003 06-Met-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 06-Mar-2003 2,699,275.00 313588DN2 MAT 03/26/2003 06-Mar-2003 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 06-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2003 497,230.69 313396HB2 MAT 06/19/2003 07-Mm-2003 -497,230.69 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2003 1,122.64 313396HB2 MAT 06/19/2003 07-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2003 498,353.33 313396HB2 MAT 06/19/2003 07-Mar-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 07-Mm 2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2003 199,224.17 313396GF4 MAT05/30/2003 07-Mar-2003 -199,224.17 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2003 243.83 3133%GF4 MAT0513012003 07-Mu-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 07-Mar-2003 199,468.00 313396GF4 MAT05/30/2003 07-Mar-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 07-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 11-Mar-2003 1,500,000.00 99402UO34 01.210%03/11/2003 DD 03/10/ 11-Mar-2003 -1,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO II-Mar-2003 50.42 99402UO34 01.210%03/112003 DD 03/101 11-My-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO -1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 11-Mar-2003 1,500,050.42 99402UO34 01.210%0311 M003 DD 03/10/ II-Mer-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY II-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4,247,405.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Mu-2003 4,247,405.00 996085247 17-Mar-2003 4,247,405.00 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,247,405.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Mar-2003 4,247,405.00 996085247 17-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,811,109.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Mar-2003 3,811,109.29 996085247 18-Mar-2003 -3,811,109.29 S 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Excc.nw Workbench Q Me11oR Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSOCONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PDACO -3,811,109.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Mer-2003 3,811,109.29 996085247 18-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 18-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-Mar-2003 5,400,000.00 99403AI93 01.320%03/182003 DO 03/17/ 18-Mar-2003 -5,400,000.00 S LEHMAN Goer SECS ING NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-Mer-2003 198.00 99403AI93 01.320%03/182003 DO 03/171 18-Mar.2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OVER-PIMCO -5,400,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-Mar.2003 5,400,198.00 99403AI93 01.320%03/182003 DD 031171 18-Mar.2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 18-Mer-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 MINNSTA MNG&MFG DISC I8-Mar-2003 1,498,923.75 60406BQQ5 0324/2003 19-Mar-2003 -1,498,923.75 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -11500,000.00 MD4NSTA MNG&MFG DISC I8-Mar-2003 820.00 60406BQQ5 032/2003 19-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 MINNSTAMNG&MFG DISC 18-Mar-2003 1,499,743.75 60406BQQ5 0324/2003 19-Mar-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 19-Mar-2003 0.00 "R 2003 11:11:43 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010060 01-M4,R-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIWLOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 PIiNEY BOWES INC DISC I8-Mar-2003 1,499,311.67 72441TQRO 03252003 19-Mar-2003 -1,499,311.67 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 PITNEY BOWES INC DISC I8-Mar-2003 38083 72447TQRO 03252003 19-Mar-2003 0.00 is 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 PITNEY BOWES INC DISC 18-Mar-2003 1,499,692.50 72447TQRO 0325rM3 19-Man2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 19-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,500,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 18-Mar-2003 1,495,131.67 07588SRG0 04/162003 19-Mar-2003 .1,495,131.67 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 18-Mar-2003 3,433.33 07588SRGO 04/162003 19-Mar-2003 0.00 Is 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,500,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC IS-Mar-2003 1,498,565.00 07588SRGO 04/162003 19-MU-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 19-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 DUPONT DE NEMOUR DISC 18-Mar-2003 998,565.00 26354BR87 04Po8I2003 19-Mar-2003 -998,565.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11::43 ErwuHve Wwkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATFJ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFI COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC IB-Mer-2003 751.67 26354DR97 04/09/2003 19-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC I8-Mar-2003 999,316.67 26354BR87 04/082003 19-Mer-2003 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 19-Mer-2003 &oo LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,593.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Mar-2003 29,593.75 996085247 19-Mar-2003 -28,593.73 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,593.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Mar-2003 28,593.75 996085247 19-Mer-2003 0.00 PC 19-Mer-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .5.400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 19-Mar-2003 5,400,000.00 99403C272 01.190%03/192003 DO 031181 19-Mer-2003 -5,400,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 19-Mar-2003 178.50 99403C272 01.190%03/192003 DO 0311S/ 19-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 19-Mar-2003 5,400,178.50 99403C272 01.190%03/192003 DO 03/181 19-Mar-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Mer-2003 0.00 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES?PAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE? COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -896,377.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Mar-2003 896,377.50 996085247 24-Mar-2003 -896,377.50 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -896,377.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Mar-2003 896.377.50 996085247 24-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 24-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,996,434.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Mar-2003 1,996,434.35 996085247 25-Ma 2003 -1,996,434.35 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,996,434.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Mer-2003 1,996,434.35 996085247 25-Mar-2003 0.00 PC 25-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -586,612.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 27-Ma -2003 596,612.50 996085247 27-Mar-2003 -586,612.50 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -586,612.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Mar-2003 586,612.50 996085247 27-Mar-2003 0.00 PC 27-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 31-Mar-2003 35,000,000.00 99403N294 01.270%0 313 12 0 03 DO 0328/ 31-Mar-2003 -35,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Erecu?im Wmkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 31-Mar-2003 3,704.17 99403N294 01.270%03/31/2003 DO 03/28/ 31-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 31-Mar-2003 35,003,704.17 99403N294 01.270oh03/31/2003 DD 03/281 31-Mar-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 31-Mar-2003 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-Mar-2003 5,200,000.00 0IF060634 6.0009/o 03/01/2033 DD 03/011 13-My-2003 -5,162,500.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 37,500.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-Mar-2003 5,200,000.00 0IF060634 6.000%0 3/0 112 03 3 DO 03/01/ 13-Mar-2003 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 13-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Mer-2003 5,207,031.25 0IF052441 5.500%04/01/2018 DD 04/Ol/ 21-Apr-2003 -5,156,250.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 50,781.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -828,044.80 FNMA POOL#0555014 07-Mar-2003 864,659.91 31385WSB6 5.500%11/01/2017 DD 10/01/ 18-Mar-2003 -856.767.60 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 7,892.31 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -828,044.80 FNMA POOLW0555014 07-Mar-2003 2,150.62 31385WSB6 5.500%II/01/2017DDIOPoI/ I9-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0A0 08-Apr-1003 11:11:43 Execuriw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOIJDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -828,044.80 FNMA POOLR0555014 07-M.-2003 966,810.53 31385WSB6 5.500%11/012017 DO IMI/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 20-MV-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -354,257.59 FNMA POOL80609665 07-Mer-2003 369,922.42 31388NJ16 5.500%11/012016 DO I UOU 18-Mar-2003 -366,545.90 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 3,376.52 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -354,257.59 FNMA POOL80609665 07-Mar-2003 920.09 31388NJ16 5.500%11/012016 DD 111011 18-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -354,257.59 FNMA POOLN0609665 07-M.-2003 370,842.51 31388N116 5.300%11/012016DD I I/01/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 20-M4r-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -304,687.80 FNMA POOL 00660867 07-Mer-2003 318,160.71 31391AFG9 5.500%01/012018 DO 01/01/ 18-Mar-2003 -315,256.66 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 2,904.05 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -304,687.80 FNMA POOLR0660867 07-Mer-2003 791.34 31391AFG9 5.500%01/012018 DID 01/Ol/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -304,687.90 FNMA POOL N0660967 07-Mer-2003 318,952.05 31391AF09 5.5001/601/012018 DO 0 110 1/ 18-Mu-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 20-My-2003 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Exemt1w Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSACONSOLIDATED ' SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -356,135.02 FNMA POOLOO660967 07-Mar-2003 371,882.87 31391AFO9 5.500%01/012018DD01/01/ I&Mar-2003 -368,488.45 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 3,394.42 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -356,135.02 FNMA POOL#0660867 07-Mar-2003 924.96 31391AF09 5.500%01/01/2018 DD 01101/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,356,135.02 FNMA POOL#0660867 07-Mar-2003 372,907.83 31391AF09 5.500%01/012018 DO 01101/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -171,855.94 FNMA POOL#0665915 07-Mar-2003 179,455.19 31391FYL6 5.500%10/01/2017 DO 1(NOl/ 18-Mar-2003 -177,317.19 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 1,638.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -171,855.94 FNMA POOL 80665915 07-Mar-2003 446.35 31391FYL6 5.500%10/012017 DO 10/01/ 18-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -171,855.94 FNMA POOL80665915 07-Mar-2003 179,901.54 31391FYL6 5.5000/610/01/20171)DI(All 18-Mar-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN OOVT SECS INC,NY 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -643,765.48 FNMA POOL40669293 07-Mar-2003 672,231.98 31391KRN9 5.500Ye11/012017DDIO/01/ 18-Mar-2003 -666,096.10 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 6,135.88 08-Apr2003 11:11:43 Em dw Wakb&Wh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -643,765.48 FNMA POOL 00669293 07-Mer2003 1,672.00 31391KRN9 5.500%11/012017 DO 10/01/ 19-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 643,765.48 FNMA POOL80669293 07-Mar-2003 673,903.98 31391KRN9 5.500Ye 11/012017 DO 10/01/ 18-Mu-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -340,955.19 FNMA POOL#0622460 07-Mar-2003 356,031.80 31389DQM2 5.500%12/012016 DD 121011 19-Mar-2003 352,782.07 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 3,249.73 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -340,955.19 FNMA POOL 10622460 07-Ma-2003 885.54 31389DQM2 5.500%12/012016 DO 12/01/ 19-Mm-2003 0.00 is 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -340,955.19 FNMA POOL 80622460 07-My-2003 356,917.34 31389DQM2 5.500°A 12/012016 DO 12/01/ 18-My-2003 0.00 FC LERMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 24-Ma 2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,180,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BUS 13-Mar-2003 2,207,707.80 3133MKFC6 3.125%11IM003 DO 12/03/ 14-Mv-2003 -2,207,878.60 S WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW -170.80 LIQUID i)PER-PIMCO -2,190,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BKS CONS BDS 13-Mw-2003 22,519.10 3133MKFC6 3.125%11/14/2003 DD 12/03/ ICMm-2003 0.00 i5 0.00 08-Ayr2003 11:11;43 Exemilm Wwkbenc6 Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Re rt PAGE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAR41LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,180,W0.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BDS 13-Mu-2003 2,230,226.90 3133MKFC6 3.125%11/14/2003 DO 121031 14-Mu-2003 0.00 PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 14-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 13-Mu-2003 3,146,015.63 0IF060436 6.000%03/012018 DD 031011 18-Mar-2003 -3,137,437.50 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 8,578.13 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 3,146,015.63 0IF060436 6.000%03/012018 DD 031011 18-Mar-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 18-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mu-2003 6,293,90625 0IF060436 6.000%03/012018 DO 03101/ 18-Mu-2003 -C274,875.00 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 19,031.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Me-2003 6,293,906.25 0IF060436 6.000%03/012019 DO 03/011 18-Mu-2003 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 18-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN 13-Mar.2003 2,025,400.00 31359MLR2 3.125%11/152003 DD I I23/0 14-Mar-2003 -2,025,360.00 S BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 40.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HAIL MTG ASSN 13-Mu-2003 20,659.72 31359MLR2 3.125%11/152003 DO 1123/0 14-Mu-2003 0.00 1S 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Ewcv1hv Warkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIMON/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 13-Mar-2003 2,046,059.72 31359NEM 3,125%11/15/2003 DO 11/23/0 14-Mar-2003 0.00 FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 14-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 6,292,031.25 0IF060436 6.0001%03/01/2018 DO 031011 18-Maz-2003 -6,274,875.00 S BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 17,156.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Mar-2003 6,292,031.25 0IF060436 6.000%03/01/2018 DD 031011 18-Mar-2003 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NAIL TR&SVGS CT 18-Mar-2003 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Maz-2003 2,102,197.50 OIN062631 6.500%03/1SY2033 DO 03/011 20-Mar-2003 -2,100,000.00 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 2,187.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Mar-2003 2,102,187.50 OIN062631 6.500%03/15/2033 DO 03/01/ 20-Mar-2003 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Mar-2003 9,408,750.00 OIN062631 6.500%03/15/2033 DO 031011 20-Mar-2003 -8,400,000.00 S WARBURG DILLON READ LLG,NEW 8,750.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO 4,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 14-Ma 2003 8,408,750.00 OING62631 6.5001/.03/15/2033 DO 031011 20-Mar-2003 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 20-Ma 2003 0.00 08Apr-2003 11:11:43 Fmcudw Workbe.h Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 44 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -596,153.09 GNMA 11 POOL#0003152 14-Mer2003 623,520.35 36202DQD6 7,500%1 012 02 0 3 1 DO 10/01/ 20-Mar-2003 -617,658.91 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 5,861.54 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -586,153.08 GNMA II POOL 00003152 14-Mu-2003 2,320.19 36202DQD6 7.5 0 00/0 1 02 02 03 1 DO 10/01/ 20-My-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -586,153.08 GNMA U POOL 00003152 14-Mar-2003 625,840.54 36202DQD6 7.300%10202031 DO 10/01/ 20-Mar-2003 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -117,791.90 GNMA 11 POOL#0003109 14-Me-2003 125,290.50 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DD07/01/ 20-Me-2003 -124,112.69 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 1,177.92 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -117,791.90 GNMA II POOL 00003109 14-Men2003 466.22 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DD 07/01/ 20-Mm-2003 0.00 Is 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -117,781.90 GNMA 11 POOL#0003109 14-Mw-2003 125,756.72 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DO 07/01/ 20-Me 2003 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 20-Me 2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEES IB-Me 2003 4,547,752.00 3134A4CQ5 6.375%11/152003 DO 11/17/0 19-Mar-2003 -4,554,308.00 S BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE -6,556.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Execullm Plwkbenc Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 45 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEBS 18-Mar-2003 %,616.67 3134A4CQ5 6.375%11/152003 DD 1111710 19-My-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEBS 18-Mar-2003 4,644,368.67 3134A4CQ5 6.375%11/152003 DD 11/17/0 19-Mar-2003 0.00 PC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE 7AETE 19-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 20-Mar-2003 2,035,859.39 OIF050445 5.000%04/012018 DD 041011 21-Apr-2003 -2,055,937.50 S LEHMAN GOYT SECS MG NY -20,078.12 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 20-Mar-2003 3,053,789.06 0IF050445 5.000%04/012018 DO 04/01/ 21-Apr-2003 -3,093,906.25 S BEAR STEARNS&.CO INC,NY -30,117.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 25-Ma 2003 5,162,304.69 0IF060642 6.00091.04/012033 DD 04/01/ 14-Apr-2003 -5,194,375.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY -22,070.31 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -30,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Mar-2003 32,960,156.25 9128276N7 05.750%11/152005 DO 11/15/ 28-Mar-2003 -32,985,762.60 S CITIGROUP GBL MKTS/SALOMON, -25,606.35 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -30,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Mar-2003 633,770.72 9128276N7 05.750Ye 11/152005 DO 11/151 28-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Fr fiw Wmkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 46 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00Go0010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -30,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-Mar-2003 33,593,926.97 9128276N7 05.750%11/152005 DO 111151 28-Mar-2003 0.00 FC CITIGROUP GBL MKTS/SALOMON, 28-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,315,710.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 27-Mm-2003 11,306,985.26 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 011151 28-Mar-2003 -9,064,762.44 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 2,242,222.92 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,315,710.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 27-Mar-2003 69,246.34 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 28-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,315,710.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 27-Mar-2003 11,376,231.60 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 28-Mu-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 28-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,287,898.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 27-Mar-2003 7,155,294.74 9128274Y5 3.975%011152009 DO 011151 28-Mu-2003 -6,301,057.68 S BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 854,237.06 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,287,898.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 27-Mar-2003 48,644.73 9128274Y5 3.875%01/152009 DD 01/15/ 28-Mar-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,287,898.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 27-Mar-2003 7,203,939.47 9128274Y5 3.975%01/152009 DO 01/151 28-Mar-2003 0.00 FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOEFE 2&Mar-2003 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 08-Apr2003 11:11:43 Erecurhe Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 47 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSo00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,359.10 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 01-Feb-2003 3,359.10 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2029 DD 12101/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,357.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Feb-2003 43,357.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 43,403.19 PDC 46.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -717.79 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 01-Feb-2003 717.79 302998GE3 7.500%12/OIR030 DD 10/20 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 04-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,363.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Feb-2003 43,363.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 43,409.70 PI) 46.20 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,363.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Feb-2003 43,363.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DD IVOV 01-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -159,437.42 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 01-Mar-2003 159,437.42 83162CUO 6.340%03/012021 01-Mu-2003 -159,437.42 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -159,437.42 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 01-Mar-2003 159,437.42 83162CUO 6.340%03/012021 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 03-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Apr2003 11:11:43 Eremtm Workbench Q Mellon Trost-Sample Report PAGE: 48 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,760.53 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-Mar-2003 53,760.53 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DO 03/01/ 01-Mar-2003 -55,121.34 PD -1,360.81 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,760.53 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-Mar-2003 53,760.53 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 03/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 PC 17-Ma-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -623.31 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Mar-2003 623.31 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DD 04/01/ 01-Mer-2003 -591.66 PD 31.65 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -623.31 GNMA PGOL#0506636 01-Mar-2003 623.31 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,409.75 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Mar-2003 1,409.75 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Mar-2003 -1,338.16 PD 71.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,409.75 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-MU-2003 1,409.75 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029 DD 041011 01-Mar-2003 0.00 PC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33.48 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Mar-2003 33.48 3621000E5 6.000%02/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Mar-2003 -31.78 PD 1.70 08-Apr-1003 11:11:43 - - _ EzecuUm Wakbewh Q MelloD Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 49 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000I0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPITON/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GARWIASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33.48 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Mm-2003 33,48 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029DD02/01/ 01-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46.82 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Mm-2003 46.82 36210NP45 6.000%I2/15/2028 DO 12/011 01-Mm-2003 44.44 PI) 2.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46.82 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Mm-2003 46.82 362IONP45 6.000%17JI52029 DO 12/01/ 01-Mm-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,940.94 GNMA POOL#0496461 01-Mm-2003 33,940.94 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029 DD 01/011 01-Mm-2003 -32,217.38 PD 1,723.56 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,940.94 GNMA POOL#0496461 01-Mm-2003 33,940.94 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 01-Mm-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mm-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -245.70 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Mm-2003 245.70 36210AVM6 6.000%1 2/1 52 0 2 8 DD 12/01/ 01-Mm-2003 -233.22 PD 12.48 LONG TF,RM OPER-PIMCO -245.70 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Mm-2003 245.70 36210AVM6 6.000°A 12/I5/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Mm-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mm-2003 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 EeemtNe WM*bewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 50 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocs0000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37.67 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-My-2003 37.67 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 09101/ 01-My-2003 -35.76 PD 1.91 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37.67 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Mar-2003 37.67 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 09/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 PC 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,943.62 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Mar-2003 15,943.62 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028DD08/01/ 01-Mar-2003 -15,133.98 PD 809.64 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,943.62 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-My-2003 15,943.62 36209AET3 6.000%091152028DDO&/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,229.11 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Mar-2003 1,229.11 36209AE49 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/01/ 01-Mar-2003 -1,166.69 PD 62.42 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,229.11 GNMA POOLOO465555 01-Mar-2003 1,229.11 36209AE49 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/011 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TtRM OPER-PIMCO -856.29 GNMA POOL#0467296 01-Mar-2003 856.29 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152023 DO 10/01/ 01-Mar-2003 -812.91 PD 43.49 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 F e.li a Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 51 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATEl AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -856.29 GNMA POOL40467286 01-My-2003 856.29 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 101011 01-My-2003 0.00 FC 17-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.03 GNMA POOLM0467279 01-My-2003 55.03 36209CCQ7 6.0001%10/152028 DD 101011 01-My-2003 -52.24 PD 2.79 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.03 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-My-2003 55.03 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/1028 DD 10/01/ 01-My-2003 0.00 FC 17-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -416.93 GNMA POOL#0469689 01-My-2003 416.93 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028 DD I U01/ 01-Mar-2003 -395.76 PD 21.17 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -416.93 GNMA POOL80469688 01-My-2003 416.93 36209EXRB 6.000%11/152028 DD I 1/01/ 01-My-2003 0.00 FC 17-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,022.34 GNMA POOL 80468339 01-My-2003 43,022.34 36209DHQO 6.000%09/15/1028 DD 08/011 01-My-2003 -40,837.61 PD 2,194.73 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,022.34 GNMA POOL80468339 01-Mar-2003 43,022.34 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 17-My-2003 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 EYemllw Wwkb.rch Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 52 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -56.89 GNMA POOL80468330 01-Mu-2003 56.99 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DO 05/01/ 01-Mu-2003 -54.00 PI) 2.89 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -56.89 GNMA POOL8046833D 01-Mu-2003 56.89 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DO 051011 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,188.78 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Mu-2003 3,188.78 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Mu-2003 3,026.95 PD 161.93 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,188.78 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Mu-2003 3,188.78 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50.18 GNMA POOL 80438057 01-Mu-2003 50.18 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Mu.2003 47.63 PD 2.55 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50.18 ONMA POOL80438057 01-Mu-2003 50.18 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028 DD 051011 01-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -23,366.58 GNMA H POOL 0090089M 01-Mar-2003 23,366.58 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Mar-2003 -23,877.72 PD -511.14 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Executive wkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 53 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCM-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,366.58 GNMA It POOL 0090088M 01-M# 2003 23,366.58 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DD 06/01/ 01-My-2003 0.00 FC 20-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15.889.20 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-My-2003 15,889.20 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 1=02026 DD 12/019 01-My-2003 -16,152.37 PI) -263.17 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,999.20 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-My-2003 15,889.20 36225CAZ9 VAR FIT 12/202026 DD 121019 01-My-2003 0.00 FC 20-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,350.68 GNMA II POOL 00003109 01-Mar-2003 10.350.68 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DO 07/011 01-My-2003 -10,907.03 PD -556.35 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,350.68 GNMA 11 POOL 00003109 01-My-2003 10.350.68 36202DN23 7.500%0720/2031 DD 07/01/ 01-My-2003 0.00 FC 20-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -154,337.61 GNMA POOL#0569358 01-MvQ003 154,337.61 362000QK3 6.500%04/15/2032 DD 041011 01-My-2003 -157,954.90 PD -3,617.29 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -154,337.61 GNMA POOL00569358 01-My-2003 154,337.61 362000QK3 6.500%0 411 51203 2 DO 041011 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mv-2003 0.00 08-Apr2003 11:11:43 &emt1w Wwkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 54 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,379.63 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Mar-2003 4,378.63 36210FRY4 6.0005601/152029DD01/01/ 01-My-2003 -4,156.29 PD 222.35 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,378.63 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Mar-2003 4,378.63 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD0l/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2Z659.84 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-My-2003 22,659.84 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029DD03/01/ 01-Mu-2003 -21,509.15 PD 1,150.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,659.84 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Mar-2003 22,659.94 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029DD03/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 17-Ma 2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,339.88 GNMA POOL#0496284 01-Mar-2003 2,339.88 36210M151 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Mar-2003 -2,221.06 PD 118.92 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,339.89 GNMA POOL#0496284 01-Mar-2003 2,339.88 36210MI51 6.0005/o01/152029 DD 02/0V 01-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 18-Ma-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,338.00 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 01-Mar2003 1,338.00 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12 II 01-MM-2003 -1,305.39 PD 32.61 08-Apr 2003 11:11:43 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 55 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,359.52 GNMA 11 POOL 00003152 01-Mar-2003 46,359.52 36202DQD6 7.500%10202031 DO 101011 01-My-2003 48,851.35 PD -2,491.83 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,359.52 GNMA II POOL#0003152 01-Mm-2003 46,359.52 36202DQD6 7.500%10202031 DO 10/01/ 01-Mm-2003 0.00 FC 20-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,627.76 GNMA II POOL 80080395 01-Mu-2003 17,627.76 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04202030 DO 04/01/ 01-Mu-2003 -17,468.01 PD 159.75 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,627.76 GNMA 11 POOL 40080395 01-Mu-2003 17,627.76 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04202030 DO 041011 01-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 20-Mm-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -149,27B.90 GNMA II POOL 4080408X 01-Mu-2003 149,278.90 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 05/01/ 01-Mu-2003 -147,762.79 PD 1,516.11 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -149,279.90 GNMA II POOL 0080408X 01-Mu-2003 149,278.90 36225CN29 6.5001/o 05202030 DD 05/011 01-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 20-Mu-2003 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -193,297.92 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF TI I A6 01-Mu-2003 183,297.92 3133TDPV2 6.500%0925/2018 01-Mu-2003 -183,379.30 PD -81.38 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Exeeuliw Wwkbexch Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 56 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocscomloom 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -193,297.92 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF TI I A6 01-Mu-2003 183,297.92 3133TDPV2 6.500%09/25/2018 01-Mv-2003 0.00 FC 25-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,427.61 GREYSTONE SVCG CORP FHA 495- 01-Mu-2003 1,427.61 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2023 DO 02/29/ 01-Mu-2003 -1,406.75 PD 20.86 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,427.61 GREYSTONE SVCG CORP FRA 895- 01-Mu-2003 1,427.61 39810NAE1 7A30°A 06/01/2023 DO 02/29/ 01-Mu-2003 0.00 PC 25-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,832.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Mu-2003 37,832.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/15/2032 DD 121011 01-Mu-2003 -37,872.81 PD -40.31 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -722.80 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 01-My-2003 722.80 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DO 10/21/9 01-Mu-2003 -707.10 PD 15.70 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -722.90 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 01-14u-2003 722.90 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DO 10/21/9 01-Mu-2003 0.00 PC 31-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,747.69 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A4 08-Mu-2003 25,747.69 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DD 06/21/9 08-Mu-2003 -26,463.80 PD -716.11 08-Apr-1003 11:11:43 &ecutire o kbuxh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 57 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,747.69 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-Mu-2003 25,747.69 74046RFW6 6.4309/.03/082004 DD 062119 09-Mu-2003 0.00 FC 10-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -52,277.10 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Mar-2003 52,277.10 25475MAD6 5.840%10/172011 DD 03118/ 15-M"-2003 -53,371.65 PD -1,094.55 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -52,277.10 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Mm-2003 52,277.10 25475MAD6 5.840%10/172011 DD03/18/ 15-MU-2003 0.00 PC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -33,973.18 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Ma 2003 33,973.19 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 I&Mv-2003 -33,973.18 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,973.18 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Mar-2003 33,973.18 3837H4NX9 VAR FIT 02/162030 16-My-2003 0.00 PC 17-Mar-2003 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 PITNEY BOWES INC DISC 03-Mu-2003 1,498,257.50 72447TQ33 03/032003 03-My-2003 -1,498,257.50 MT 03-My-2003 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Eucutiw Wwkbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: J8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Mar-2003 4,491,285.00 313396CQ4 MAT 03/04/2003 04-Mar-2003 -4,491,295.00 MT 04-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 05-Mar-2003 499,487.50 313588CR4 MAT 03/05/2003 05-Mar-2003 -499,487.50 MT 05-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 10-My-2003 1,499,062.50 97665SQAI 03/102003 10-Mar-2003 1,499,062.50 MT 10-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 STUDENT IN MARKETING ASSN ST 20-Ma 2003 100,000.00 86387THU5 VAR RT 03/202003 DD 09/19/ 20-Mu-2003 -99,921.88 MT 20-Mar-2003 78.12 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -291,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 21-Mar-2003 290,093.24 313312DHO MAT 03212003 21-Mar-2003 -280,093.24 MT 21-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 26-Me 2003 597,460.00 313588DN2 MAT 03262003 26-Mu-2003 -597,460.00 MT 26-Mar.2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 27-Mar-2003 3,899,920.25 313396DP5 MAT 03272003 27-Mar-2003 -3,898,820.25 MT 27-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Ew ttw Wo kbe.h Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 59 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY TO TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 31-Mu-2003 16,998,229.17 313588DT9 MAT 03/312003 31-Mu-2003 -16,998,229.17 MT 31-Mu-2003 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 DEAN WITTER DISCOVER&CO 01-Mar-2003 200,000.00 24240VAC5 6.875%03/012003 01-Mu-2003 -206,966.00 MT 01-Mar-2003 -6,866.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -150,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH 01-Mu-2003 150,000.00 59018SEP9 6.875%03/012003 01-Mu-2003 -155,247.00 MT 01-Mu-2003 -5,247.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 BOATMENS BANCSHARES INC SUB 15-Mu-2003 400,000.00 0%650AE6 6.750%03/152003 DO 03115/9 1S•Mu-2003 411,460.00 MT 15-Mu-2003 -11,460.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 LILLY ELI&CO NT I5-Mu-2003 700,000.00 532457A37 6.250%03/152003 DO 03/15/9 15-Mu-2003 -706,771.00 MT I5-Mu-2003 -6,771.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMA 17-Mu-2003 3,000,000.00 345397SR5 VAR RT 03/172003 DO 03/16t 17-Mu-2003 -3,000,000.00 MT 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 24-Mu-2003 100,000.00 313400TH6 6.220%03242003 DO 032419 24-Mu-2003 -101,807.00 MT 24-Mar-2003 -1,807.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Eremf Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 60 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS CORPORATE ACTIONS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 22-Mar-2003 2,080,000.00 542671C'7 8.200%03/15/2023 DO 032919 22-Mar-2003 -2,151,250.00 CAL •71,250.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 22-Mar-2003 2,080,000.00 542671CT7 8.200%03/15/2023 DO 03/28/9 22-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 24-Mar-2003 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -0.01 TO DELIVER OFF FRACTIONAL UN 24-Mar-20D3 0.00 36202DQD6 GNMA U POOL#0003152 24-Mar-2003 -0.01 SW -0.01 INTEREST LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN 8TR 0011 03-Mar-2003 109,500.00 69512EEU5 7.300%10222004 DO 10/22/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 03-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Mu-2003 2.10 996087094 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 03-My-2003 0.00 08-Ap-2003 11:11:43 Ereeariw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Rep2rt PAGE. 61 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGo0010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIMONI SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH 03-Mu-2003 5,156.25 590188EP9 6.875%03/012003 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 03-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 DEAN WITTER DISCOVER&CO 03-Ma 2003 6,875.00 24240VAC5 6.975%031012003 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 03-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 159,437.42 SBA GTD DEV PARK 2001-20C 1 03-Mu-2003 125,458.03 83162CLI0 6.340%03/012021 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 03-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 PIINEY BOWES INC DISC 03-Me 2003 1,742.50 72447IQ33 03/032003 03-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 03-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-IC 03-Mu-2003 54,649.00 909317BC2 6.831%09/012008 DO 0822/ 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 03-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Mu-2003 3,364.72 996085247 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 04-Mu-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Mu-2003 191.44 996085247 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 04-Mu-2003 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Ew h.Work6rxh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 62 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOWDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE! COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Mar-2003 8,715.00 313396CQ4 MAT 03/042003 04-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 04-Met-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 717.79 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE k000-11150 04-My-2003 5,963.11 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DO 1012119 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 04-Mer-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 05-Mar-2003 512.50 313588CR4 MAT 03/052003 05-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 05-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 10-Mar-2003 937.50 97665SQAI 03/102003 10-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 10-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,747.69 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 10-Mar-2003 888.97 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DO 0612 0S.Mar-2003 0.00 IT 10-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 LILLY ELI&CO NT 17-Maz-2003 21,875,00 532457AI7 6.250%03/15/2003 DO 0311519 15-Maz-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 656,000.00 PROCTER&GAMBLE CO MS 17-Mar-2003 17,220.00 742718RK4 5.250%09/152003 DD 0928/9 15-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Met-2003 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 63 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/I.OSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 BOATMENS BANCSHARES INC SUB 17-MV-2003 13,500.00 096650AE6 6.750%03/15/2003 DO 03/15/9 15-MU-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 17-Mar-2003 69,562.50 31359MEY5 6.625%09/152009 DD 09/01/9 15-My-2003 0.00 IT 17-Ma-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 17-Mar-2003 82,000.00 542671C17 8.200%03/152023 DD 03/20 15-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,359.10 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 17-My-2003 340.70 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37.67 GNMA POOL#0493452 17-Me-2003 129.29 36209WBV3 6.000%09/12028 DD 09/01/ 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 245,70 GNMA POOL#0486720 17-Mer-2003 85.84 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53,760.53 FHLMC GROUP#G4.0353 17-Mar-2003 1,355.68 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DO 03/0Y 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Aprv2003 11:11:43 Fu.dn Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 64 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,378.63 GNMA POOL#0491103 17-Mar-2003 914.96 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,940.94 GNMA POOL#04%461 17-Mar-2003 3,501.79 3621OMQN4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46.82 GNMA POOL#0497343 17-Mar-2003 162.05 36210NP45 6.000%12/152029 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33.48 GNMA POOL#0499153 17-Mar-2003 112.61 3621000E5 6,000%02/15/2029 DO 02/011 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,409.75 GNMA POOL#0500917 17-Mar-2003 79.61 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DO 04/011 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,659.84 GNMA POOL#0503388 17-Mar-2003 2,846.93 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029 DD 03/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 623.31 GNMA POOL#0506636 17-Mar-2003 265.88 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Ma-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Executive ork#ench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 65 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAR41LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 52,277.10 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 17-Mar-2003 1,209.99 25475MAD6 5.840%10/17/2011 DD 03/1S/ 15-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50.18 GNMA PGOL 80438057 17-Mer-2003 182.23 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DDO5/011 01-Mm-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 O.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,189.79 GNMA POOL#0457814 17-Mar-2OD3 320.74 36208QSB3 6.0DO'/.10/152028 DO ION I/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,943.62 GNMA POOL 40465546 17-Mar-2003 3.696.80 36209AET3 6.0001/.08/152028 DD 08101/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,229.11 GNMA P001,00465555 17-My-2003 3,717.34 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2029 DD 09/011 01-MU-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55.03 GNMA POOL 80467279 17-Mar-2003 166.87 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 856.29 GNMA POOLND467296 17-Mar-2003 3,116.29 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Mer-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 03-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Ettcul.Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 66 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DAT& AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56.89 GNMA POOL#0468330 17-Mar-2003 161.33 36209DHF4 6.000Ya 05/15/2029 DO 051011 01-Mar-2003 0.00 1T 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,022.34 GNMA PGOL#0468339 17-Mar-2003 3,363,78 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 416.93 GNMA POOL#046%88 17-Mu-2003 140.61 36209EXRR 6.000%11/152029 DO 11/01/ 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,363.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SEE E3 17-Mu-2003 5,599.79 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DO 17101/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 17-Mu-2003 6.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/1 512 0 3 2 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0,00 IT 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,973.18 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 17-Mu-2003 1,688.43 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mu-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 154,337.61 GNMA POOL#0569358 17-Mu-2003 14,884.68 362000QK3 6.500M 04/152032 DO 04/011 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mu-2003 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 &eeu&m Workbench- Q Mellon Trost-Sample Report PAGE: ,67 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCS000010000 01-MAR-2003 -31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMA 17-Mar-2003 12,000.00 345397SR5 VAR RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/ 17-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 17-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,339.88 GNMA POOL#0496284 18-Mar-2003 11.70 36210MI51 6.0005'001/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 18-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,351.21 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SEE 162 19-Mar-2003 14,351.21 3133TI7A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/01/9 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 19-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN ST 20-My-2003 671.11 86387THU5 VAR RT 03/20/2003 DD 09/19/ 20.Mar-2003 0.00 IT 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,350.69 GNMA 11 POOL#0003109 20-Mar-2003 800.83 36202DN23 7.500%07/20/2031 DO 07/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,359.52 GNMA II POOL#0003152 20-Mar-2003 3,953.20 36202DQD6 7.500%10/20/2031 DO 10/0V 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 23,366.58 GNMA II POOL#080088M 20-Ma 2003 2,418.28 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 20-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Ap,2003 11:11:43 Emcutive Wwk6e=h Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 68 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,627.76 GNMA II POOL#0080395 20-Mar-2003 1,616.52 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030DD04/01/ 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 149,278.90 GNMA II POOL 8080408X 20-Mar-2003 14,686.83 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DD 051011 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,899.20 GNMA II POOL 80080023 20-Mar-2003 1,719.08 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 121202026 DD 12/0119 01-My-2003 0.00 IT 20-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 281,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 21-Mar-2003 916.76 313312DHO MAT 03212003 21-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 21-Mar-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 24-Mar-2003 3,110.00 313400TH6 6.2209/.03/242003 DD 032419 24-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 24-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 24-Mar-2003 3,188.89 542671CT7 8.200%03/152023 DD 031M 0.00 CD 24-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 183,297.92 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 25-Mar-2003 8,382.79 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 25-Mm-2003 0.00 08-Apr 2003 11:11:43 Emcuaw B'ork&.,h Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE •69 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,427.61 GREYSTONE SVCG CORP FRA k95- 25-Mar-2003 4,930.44 398108AE4 7.430%06101/2023 DD 021291 01-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 25-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 26-Mar-2003 2,540.00 313588DN2 MAT 03/2&2003 26-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 26-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,90000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 27-Mar-2003 1,179.75 313396DP5 MAT03272003 27-Mar-2003 0.00 FC 27-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FOS MT AD] 31-My-2W3 -102.84 990000P14 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-Mar-2003 0.00 CW 31-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR 01 SERA 31-Mar-2003 100,625.00 927804ENO 5.750%0313 12 0 0 6 DO 0327/0 30-Mar-2003 0.00 1T 31-Mar-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 31-Mar-2003 1,770.83 313588DIV MAT 03/312003 31-Mar-2003 0.00 IT 31-My-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 722.90 WMPIHUNTOON PAIGE 8000.11150 31-Mar-2003 5,958.62 302998GE3 7.500%12/OI2030DD 1021/9 01-Mu-2003 0.00 IT 31-Mar-2003 0.00 08-Apr-2003 11:11:43 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 70 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAR-2003-31-MAR-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Ma-2003 105,990.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 0.00 CD 31-Ma-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FRLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 31-Ma-2003 3.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DD 121011 0.00 CD 31-Mu-2003 0.00 08-Ap-2003 11:11:43 Emculiw Workbench FAHR COMMITTEE meebng99/R3Date Ta04sd.orwr. M/ /i3/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-24 14(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources ORIGINATOR: James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor SUBJECT: Safety Policy, Personal Protective Equipment Policy GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve SAFETY-POL-102— Personal Protective Equipment, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. SUMMARY The District is implementing a written policy to adopt portions of the General Industry Safety Orders, found in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations that require specific personal protective equipment be wom when performing work in which hazards cannot be eliminated by the use of engineering controls. This new policy requires that personal protective equipment is wom in certain areas of the plant and where posted. The document presented for your review and adoption represents the districts written Personal Protective Equipment Policy that conforms to the elements defined in the General Industry Safety Orders, Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Policy required under the General Industry Safety Orders, found in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. f ALTERNATIVES Not Applicable CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1- Personal Protective Equipment Policy (SAFETY-POL-102) ao«.m.m:.m s.nmssmao.u«w s.roresT.mv.,.ry im..,.i rre.ororevrem+a�a�.sam rdky.a« a>.mm. szomi Page 2 8 . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Safety and Health Division SAFETY-POL-102 Personal Protective Equipment Program APPROVALS Approved by: Date: Director of Human Resources Approved by: Date: Manager,Human Resources Approved by: Date: Safety and Health Supervisor PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and Health public folder to ensure that they have the latest version. Personal Protective Equipment Program SAFETY-POL-102 , Contents 1. Purpose...............................................................................................3 2. Definitions...........................................................................................3 3. Requirements......................................................................................4 3.1 Minimum Requirements for Personal Protective Equipment....................4 4. Responsibilities..................................................................................4 4.1 Safety and Health Division.......................................................................4 4.2 Employee Development Division............................................................. 5 4.3 Purchasing............................................................................................... 5 4.4 Warehouse.............................................................................................. 5 4.5 District Management and Supervision.....................................................6 4.6 Employees, Contractors, Consultants, Visitors and Volunteers...............6 5. References ..........................................................................................6 6. Attachments........................................................................................6 2 of ' Number: SAFETY-POL-102 Orange County Sanitation District Revision Number: 0 Personal Protective Equipment Program Date: April 23, 2003 Approved by: Lisa Tomko 1 . Purpose The purpose of the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Policy is to establish the: • Requirements for the selection, use, storage, care and maintenance of personal protective equipment. • Training requirements for personnel using personal protective equipment. The District shall provide required personal protective equipment to all employees at no expense to the employee. Exceptions to this policy are for personal preferences for upgrades of equipment issued by the District's Warehouse or other personal protective equipment such as prescription safety glasses or protective footwear District provided personal protective equipment is to be used only on District business. This policy applies to all District employees, volunteers and visitors. Contractors, consultants, and service representatives must wear the appropriate personal protective equipment as specified in District related contracts and/or purchase orders. 2. Definitions Personal Equipment that is distributed to and worn by employees to Protective protect them from work place physical, chemical, and/or Equipment (PPE) environmental hazards. 3of6 Personal Protective Equipment Program SAFETY-POL-102 0 3. Requirements 3.1 Minimum Requirements for Personal Protective Equipment All personal protective equipment shall meet or exceed the requirements set forth in national consensus standards for personal protective equipment or applicable California Occupational Safety and Health Requirements. 4. Responsibilities 4.1 Safety and Health Division The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for the following: 1. Develop a written Personal Protective Equipment Program that includes the following elements: a. Hazard Assessments for personal protective equipment for use by for District employees. b. Personal Protective Equipment use areas. c. Signage and labeling. d. Care, maintenance and inspection of personal protective equipment. e. Provisions for discarding used, damaged or obsolete personal protective equipment. f. Medical surveillance requirements when applicable. g. Training and education. h. Program administration. 2. Maintain a list of District approved personal protective equipment. 3. Initiate annual program reviews in accordance with the requirements of SAFETY-SP-102.1 Personal Protective Equipment Program. 4 of Personal Protective Equipment Program SAFETY-13OL-102 e 4.2 Employee Development Division The Employee Development Division shall be responsible for the following: 1. Document employee training in the Training Records Management System database. 4.3 Purchasing The Purchasing Division shall be responsible for. 1. Select vendors and establish contracts or purchase orders to procure personal protective equipment. 2. Procure only personal protective equipment listed on the "Approved personal protective equipment" list maintained by the Safety and Health Division. a. Equivalent equipment substitutions shall not be allowed. 3. Notify the Warehouse and the Safety and Health Division when identical equipment is not available. 4.4 Warehouse The Warehouse shall be responsible to: 1. Ensure stocks of personal protective equipment meet anticipated needs to ensure that employees have the necessary tools and equipment to safely perform their jobs. 2. Track usage of personal protective equipment. a. Notify the Safety and Health Division regarding personal protective equipment that is not being used. 3. Issue personal protective equipment to employees as requested. a. Respiratory Protective equipment and fall protection equipment shall be issued only with the written approval of Safety and Health. 5 of 4 Personal Protective Equipment Program SAFETY-POL•102 1 4.5 District Management and Supervision 1. Procure and make available appropriate personal protective equipment for employees. 2. Enforce personal protective use requirements as outlined in SAFETY-SP-102.1 Personal Equipment Program. 4.6 Employees, Contractors, Consultants, Visitors and Volunteers 1. Employees, visitors and volunteers are responsible for wearing appropriate personal protective equipment while at district facilities. 2. It is the responsibility of the District representative to ensure that contractors, visitors, consultants and volunteers wear the appropriate personal protective equipment. a.The District representative may provide District issued personal protective equipment if applicable. 5. References SAFETY-POL-101 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-SP-102.1 Personal Protective Equipment Program 6. Attachments None 6 of FAHR COMMITTEE MeeOngDate Toetl.ofD1r 04-23-03 AGENDA REPORT Item Numb Ren Number I[em IMeI Orange County Sanitation District FROM: FAHR Committee Originator: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE USER FEE RECOMMENDATION FAHR COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a 15% increase to the Sewer Service User Fee, for a total Single Family Residence fee of $100.50 for FY 03/04, and to review user fee structure in one year. SUMMARY The FAHR Committee received the staff report attached to the accompanying Agenda Report and considered each of the altematives presented by staff. After considerable discussion about the need to increase fees in order to pay for the Board's decisions to discharge fully disinfected and secondary treated effluent as soon as possible and the financial impacts on residents and businesses, the Committee voted to recommend a rate increase. The Committee recommends a 15% increase in the basic and benchmark annual rate for a Single-Family Residence from $87.50 per year to $100.50 per year. Staff was also directed to return next year with another multi-year proposal when the economy has improved and the impacts of the current State financial crisis are better understood. Former Revenue Areas 1 and 13 had adopted rates of $100.00 per year or greater for fiscal year 1999-2000, but those rates were reduced in 2000-01, subsequent to the consolidation of the District and adoption of the regional "postage stamp" rate. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Costs associated with a rate increase include the preparation and mailing of a notice of public hearing to all property owners and the related staff costs to respond to telephone calls and e-mails. These costs are expected to be less than $250,000. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please see the original Agenda Report and Staff Report attached. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Original Agenda Report, Staff report and attachments GGS:lc C Wnmenb vq S ,ngs�ko Serv,gSTempa lme Fk LI FE tem 14(e)Rn+ Uw Fees ^ ^ Page 2 FAHRCOMMI TTEE Meeting Date To ad.ofDir. 04-09-03 04-23-03 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number MM Number FAHR03-25 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE USER FEE ALTERNATIVES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors a sanitary sewer service user fee schedule for fiscal years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. SUMMARY Historically the District has increased our overall sewer user fees in fairly small annual increments, using debt financing to smooth the impact of the capital improvement program. With the public interest in improved effluent quality and the Board's decision to meet secondary treatment discharge standards rapidly, now may be an appropriate time to increase the rates more on the front-end of the capital improvement program in order to match the program itself and to reduce the long-term impacts of debt financing. Increasing user fees more quickly and reducing borrowing can be shown to reduce the total fees paid by users over the long tens. The cost of this reduction is higher fees in the Immediate future. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The recently completed Engineering CIP Validation Study, FY 2003-04, and the Secondary Treatment Peer Review have developed a capital improvement program that meets the Board's direction to meet secondary treatment standards as quickly as possible while providing for increased flows and rehabilitation and refurbishment of existing facilities. Over the next seven years, the CIP cash flow needs will be $1.8 billion; an annual average of nearly $260 million. When the current user fee schedule was adopted, pending the Board's treatment level decision in July 2002, the anticipated CIP was $1.2 billion for the same period. How much of the CIP is funded by borrowing has a significant impact on the user fee rates. This report presents alternatives ranging from nearly 100% debt financing to 37%over the 2020 planning period. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The attached Staff Report and cash flow summaries explain the impacts of aftemative debt financing and rate increase philosophies. Staff has removed the consideration of aftemative reserve policies because the overall impact on rates and total reserves was Insignificant. Cash flow analyses have shown that the rate of sewer user fee increase has much more impact and that the discussion should be focused there. ALTERNATIVES 1. Alternatives considered in the staff report include: • Initial rate increases of 10%and borrowing of$2.31 billion • Initial rate increases of 15%and borrowing of$1.59 billion • Initial rate increases of 20%and borrowing of $1.24 billion • Initial rate increases of 25% and borrowing of$1.08 billion • Initial rate increases of 40% and borrowing of$0.94 billion. 2. Adopt rates for a shorter or longer period than the 5-years proposed. 3. Conduct an election to increase the property tax for facilities construction. 4. Reduce or reprioritize the annual capital improvement program. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report 2. Comparison of Various Rate and Reserve Policies 3. Summary Cash Flow Projects, Entire Collection System 4. Graph of Capital Improvement Programs GGS:Ic c DecumeiKK w SMtl^N`D.MLLxal SNO^WTemPomry memel FMbWfEY•m IMU1.arc n.ama. aaaro Page 2 nd April 3, 2003 STAFF REPORT Annual Sewer Service User Fee Alternatives BACKGROUND Portions of the District have been collecting an annual sewer service user fee as a separate line item on the property tax bill since 1982. The current fee was adopted for one year only, pending the Board's decision regarding the level of treatment in July 2002; well after the deadline to adopt a fee for the fiscal year. Because these fees are collected on the property tax bill, they are received primarily in November and April. For fiscal 2002-03, we expect to receive about$78 million of sewer service user fees. These fees are used for operational and maintenance needs in the collection system and in the treatment plants, as well as for a portion of the capital improvement program. They could also be used for principal and Interest payments on certificates of participation (COPs) in the event that our share of the property tax becomes Insufficient. The Directors have control over the user fee rates as well as the structure of the assessment program. The current structure was adopted subsequent to an extensive public outreach, participation and consultation program as a part of the 1999 Strategic Plan process. This structure charges every parcel In our service area based upon the size of the building and the use of building on that parcel. The County Assessor's database is the initial source of property data and we pay a fee for the use of that data. Sewer service user fees are specifically exempted from some of the requirements of Proposition 218. Most notably,they are exempt from the election requirements, but not the requirement that fees cannot exceed the reasonable cost of service. The Board has agreed with staff, however, that we will comply with all of the rest of the requirements, in a spirit of good governance. A notice of rate changes is mailed to every property owner whenever the rates are proposed to increase. The rates are adopted through the ordinance process, and that requires two Board meetings and a public hearing. Typically, we refer to the annual single-family residential (SFR) rate as the benchmark for the user fees. Separate rates are charged for multi-family residential (MFR) units and the rates for non-residential users are various percentages of the SFR rate depending upon the type of use of the property. The current SFR rate is $87.50 per year and it was adopted for 2002-03. OVERVIEW Historically,the District has increased the overall sewer user fees in fairly small increments using debt financing to smooth the impact of the capital Improvement program. Rates have been adopted for periods ranging from 1-year to as long as 10-years. With the public interest in improved effluent quality and the Board's decision to meet secondary treatment discharge standards rapidly, now may be an appropriate time to change from a constant rate of increase to a plan that increases the rates more on the front-end of the capital improvement program in order to match the program Itself and to reduce the long-term impacts of debt financing. OCSD P.O.e .8127 F -W.Wkyy.CA 92728d127 OIJI�'--'-JII Annual Sewer Service User Fee Alternative Page 2 of 3 April 3, 2003 ' Increasing user fees more quickly and reducing borrowing can be shown to reduce the total fees paid by users over the long term. The cost of this reduced borrowing is higher fees in the immediate future. The recently completed Engineering CIP Validation Study, FY 2003-04, and the Secondary Treatment Peer Review have developed a capital improvement program that meets the Board's direction to meet secondary treatment standards as quickly as possible while providing for increased flows and rehabilitation and refurbishment of existing facilities. Over the next seven years, the CIP cash flow needs will be$1.8 billion; an annual average of nearly$260 million. When the current user fee schedule was adopted pending the Board's treatment level decision in July 2002,the anticipated CIP was $1.2 billion for the same period. How much of the CIP is funded by borrowing has a significant impact on the user fee rates. A graphical representation of the various CIPs is attached. This report presents alternatives ranging from nearly 100% debt financing to 370/6 over the 2020 planning period. ALTERNATIVE DISCUSSION Cash flow projections were completed for 5 user fee increase scenarios. All of these projections used the same capital improvement program, the same property tax growth, the same operations and maintenance costs, etc. The only changes were the rate of the annual increase in sewer user fees and the amount of borrowing. Of course these variables cause the interest income and the annual debt service expense to vary by alternative. For purposes of the model, rates were never decreased. In some cases this restriction resulted in very large cash and investment balances at the end of the planning period. If this were to happen, staff would expect to either reduce the rates or to retire some of the outstanding debt. These decisions will need to be made when and lt those balances materialize, but are not reflected in the presentation in order to reduce the number of variables being compared. A one page summary of the impacts of the various scenarios is included as the first of several attachments. 10% Rate Increases Inmost recent years the annual sewer user fee has increased by 100% or less per year. This historical rate of increase is reflected in the first alternative. This is the lowest initial increase and results in the most new borrowing. In the first 10 years,the annual SFR rate increases from $87.50 to$205.00. Rates continue to increase through 2015-16 when they reach$297.00, where they remain through 2020. The total amount of fees paid by an SFR would be$3,616.00 and there would be$708 of reserves per equivalent dwelling unit at 2020. New certificates of participation amounting to$2.31 billion are issued to fund the$2.49 billion capital improvement program. The maximum amount of debt outstanding is$2.01 billion in 2008-09. 15% Rate Increases In order to issue less debt and to finance a smaller percentage of the capital improvement program, annual rate increases were evaluated in 5% increments. A 15% initial increase is the second cash flow presented. Annual 15% increases are required each of the next 9 years, through 2011-12. At that time the annual SFR rate would be$295 and no additional increases Annual Sewer Service User Fee Alternative Page 3 of 3 April 3, 2003 are projected through 2020. The total amount of fees paid by an SFR would be$4,124.00 and there would be$907 of reserves per equivalent dwelling unit at 2020. New certificates of participation amounting to$1.59 billion are issued to fund the$2.49 billion capital improvement program. The maximum amount of debt outstanding is$1.73 billion in 2008.09. 20% Rate Increases A 20% initial increase is the next cash flow presented. Annual 200% increases are required each of the next 6 years,through 2008-09. At that time the annual SFR rate would be$260. A 12% increase, to$290, is needed in 2009.10 and no additional increases are projected through 2020. The total amount of fees paid by an SFR would be$4,317.50 and there would be $1,088 of reserves per equivalent dwelling unit at 2020. New certificates of participation amounting to $1.24 billion are issued to fund the$2.49 billion capital Improvement program. The maximum amount of debt outstanding is$1.42 billion in 2008-09. 25% Rate Increases A 25% initial increase is the fourth cash flow presented. Annual 25% increases are required each of the next 3 years through 2005-06,followed by annual increases of 200%, 19% and 140% through 2008-09. At that time the annual SFR rate would be$280, and no additional Increases are projected through 2020. The total amount of fees paid by an SFR would be$4,317.00 and there would be$1,066 of reserves per equivalent dwelling unit at 2020. New certificates of participation amounting to$1.08 billion are issued to fund the$2.49 billion capital improvement program. The maximum amount of debt outstanding is$1.32 billion in 2008-09. Rapid Rate Increases Finally,the rapid rate of increase scenario that the Committee reviewed last month is presented. Annual 40% increases are proposed each of the next 2 years through 2004-05,followed by annual increases of 22%, 19% and 4%through 2007-08. At that time the annual SFR rate would be$260, and no additional increases are projected through 2020. The total amount of fees paid by an SFR would be$4,221.50 and there would be$953 of reserves per equivalent dwelling unit at 2020. New certificates of participation amounting to$.94 billion are issued to fund the$2.49 billion capital improvement program. The maximum amount of debt outstanding is$1.18 billion in 2008-09. GGS G:\wpAla\tin\210\CRANEFAHR\FAHR2003\APR\Staff mt user fees 4-03.&c Attachments Q162GD3 8:22 AM Orange County sanitation District Summary Cash Flow Projections,Entire Collection System Validated CIP&Ecistina Reserve Policy 15%Maximum Rate Increase PreOminary Preliminary Prelbnlraq Ralimin.ry Peliminery Preliminary PmllmMary Preliminary Prelimin0ry Pnllminery 10YBBr tuf Do,odu 90 4294 0`05 PM 91:92 B 9M 49-10 1111 L12 1410 Reeenux 1 Genmst U.Fee. 71,aa4,000 89,]]],w0 103,540,030 119,wo.w0 138,1M,000 159,474,000 1M,133,OW 212,813,000 245,408.000 271.076.000 1,801,715,000 2 Pamifted User Fun 6,329,000 6,329.000 6,329.000 0,329,000 6,329,000 6,329,W0 8,329,000 0.329.000 6.329.000 6.329.000 63,290,000 3 Property Tama 3g153,0w 38,916,000 39,694,000 40,489,000 41,206,000 42,1N,000 42,90U000 43.826,000 44,702,000 45.598,000 41],]82,030 4 New COPIwW. 280,000,000 - 400.000.00D - 430,w0,000 - 3w,000,0w - 95,000,000 - 1,595,W0,00 5 Interest Revenues 91,798,OW 30,199,000 35,919.000 34,128,000 92.665,WD 33.474,000 34,1651000 35,NB,000 30,812,000 30,480,000 332,888,000 B COnnedoi Fees 5,824,000 9,120,000 9,1N,000 9,120,000 9,120,MD 9,1W,000 9,1W,Ow 9,1W,000 9,120,000 9,120,000 B7,9N,DW 7 DM.,Revenue, 23528,OW 37,428,000 62,629,000 16,228,W0 21,526,000 14,028,000 14,528,000 11,BN,000 11,628,W0 11528,000 225,700,000 a Regain 463.516A1D 214,769,Ow 657,236,000 225,953,000 879,081,000 285,449.000 081,N1,Ow 319,00,000 442,999,000 374,12e,D00 4,324,438,000 Requbemenb: 9 Oper&M"Eta 84,080.000 86,5B4,000 89,1w,000 93.030,000 93,000,OeD M,3w,000 M,B60,Ow e5,55D,000 90,09D,000 a8,880,W0 824,300,000 10 Cep6M lmp.w Pmpmm 121,001,000 210.M01000 306,785.000 3021075,w0 279,00,000 228,280,000 251.479.000 232.408,000 101,852,w0 05,098,000 2,101,035,000 Reel,Raheb&Re1mb 27,000,W0 38,800,000 65,800,W0 11 COP SeMUs 6.0%.30 yo 33.995,000 50,250,000 66,090,Ow 82,265,0W 99,507,000 116,09.000 132,3M,Ow 148.214.00 152,087.000 155.409,000 1,042,O25,000 12 OMer Rmlulremenn 2.3330W 2,333.000 2,333,O0D 2,333,000 2.333,000 2.3331OW 2,333,000 2,333,W0 2.333,000 2333,000 23,330.000 13 Requlremanla 247,269,w0 N9.503.000 484,354.w0 480.333,000 474,933,000 441,81B,W0 401,156,000 478,513,000 439,312,000 3B9,200,00 4.246.491.000 14 RevenuesRequhamWb 218,22],WO (133.614.000) 102.882.000 (2Sg380,w0) N4.151,000 (1]g369,OW) 200,065,00 (159,450,000) 3,687,000 (15,071,00s) ]],948,001) Arsumuleled Funds: 15 B,h.1n9of Yea, 437,757,WO 653,984,OW 5N.170,000 713.052.00 458.8)2a00 6e2.23,OW 466,454,000 666,5390W 527,000.000 5W,luom 437,767,000 18 EMstYWr 653,984,Ow 530,1TO,9w flJ,052,Ow 058,8]2,OW 68303300 466,gM,Ow BBB, 38,OU. 52T,069,w0 WO ,w 1 ,]09,w0 fi19,]OS,OW 17 Reeane Polley 4W,450,O0D 38D,902,000 413,180,0W 423,178,000 475,238.000 461,084.000 SV,339,000 52039,1000 513,955,00D 513,985.WD 513935,w0 Seam iiq r Umr Feae: 18 A,SFR Annast Usm Fee 951.50 81043.50 $116.60 $133.00 $163.00 $176.00 8202.50 J233.00 3288.00 EN5.O0 19 pe""ta9e Ch0 O 9.3e% 14.80% 14.93% 15.15% 1&01% 15.03% 15.0% 15.0% 15,02% 10,07% 20 Equivalent Ow Hn9 Unee BBD,1w 883,300 890,500 899.700 902.9w 908,100 BW,WD 012,500 915,700 919,0w 21 BFR Conn nFee $1,820 J2,850 $2.850 $2,850 J2,850 92,850 $2,850 J2,950 "Aso $2,850 22 Ounbuffl,COP. 8839,975,000 J024,923,OW J1,013.M.000 $991435.000 81,398,389,000 81,358,929,O00 31,]28,03],O01) 81,668,272,OW $1,08,003,000 91,594,1r,000 COP$91. 23 Sr Llen Coaarpe,Mln 1.0 2.55 2.57 2.54 1.52 1.56 1.46 1.48 1.51 1.66 119 25 Adddanal Bonds,l25 2.55 2.57 2.54 1.62 1.58 Me 1.40 1.51 1.68 1.79 Nat R..eve mtlos 99,458,O00 129,20,000 168.078.00 132,893,W0 155,224,000 111,089,O00 195,281,000 223,503,0W 251,939,ow M.469,O0 Jr lbn®T.5% - - - - - BrIImmMW J8,MOCO 50,250,000 6a008,000 82,285,000 00,507,0,M0 118,839,000 132,384,000 148,214.000 152,067,000 155,409,000 G:1ame1.dWftM0Ub,udWRAG daled 2W294m 14(a).3 4/16/2003 8:22AM Orange County Sanitation District Summery Cash Flow Projections, Entire Collections System Preliminary PreOmbbry Preeminsry, Prelfat PrefeMmry, Preiminary Pmllminary Prellminary Grand R9t lxaon0uon 36_tl L419 14:m M11 10AZ Mitt 18.1E 1%10 1GW1 Revenue.: 1 Genarel User Fees 272,020,000 272,904,000 2]3,900,000 274,082,000 2]5,]99,000 276,740,000 2]],084,000 27e,e28,000 3,804,307,000 2 PermI6e0 User Feu 0,320,wo 0,028,000 8,329,000 0,329,000 8,329,000 0,329,000 6.329,000 8,M, 00 113,onwo 3 Proparly Taros 40,508,000 41,438,000 48,387,000 49,355.000 50,342,000 51,34,000 Sx378,000 53.424,000 810,B41,000 4 NO,COP Issues - - - - - - - - 1,595,00 ,WO 5 Interest Revenues, 30,127,000 30,SOg000 32,455,00D 35,809,000 37,307,000 38,149,000 41,285,000 0,07,000 025,413,001) 0 Connec9on Fees 8,120,000 9,120,000 9,1m,ow 9.120.000 9,120,000 9,120,00D 9,120,OUD 9,120,000 180,864.000 J Other Rovonuo. 11.428.000 11,42a,0g0 11,728,000 12.126,000 12,928,000 12,428,00D 11,828,00o 11,828,000 920,90,OD0 8 Ravenms 375,532,000 3]],784,000 381,928.00D 907,453,000 381,482,000 304,115,0013 39,63x000 405,800,000 7,437,351,000 Requirement: B Oper S Mize Esp 103,700,000 104,280,000 10,gagow 105,560.000 1013,380.000 10].380,000 106,260,ow 109,060,000 1,]]3,050,000 10 Capital lmpreremem Pregrem 77,207,000 46,608,000 40,000,000 36,738,000 28,419000 31,792,000 14,414.00D 21,666,000 2,495,189,000 Rapt,Rehab B Resorts 93,800,000 46.000.000 14,6D00D0 34,700,000 93,400,000 ]8,100,000 33,100.ow 13,600,000 411,400,000 11 COP SarvIm 6.0%,30 yre 155,407,000 18B,23B4O00 154,751,000 154.703,000 150,115,000 154,6141,Ow 154,482,000 154,41n,000 x295,818,000 12 Olhee Requtmmenb 2,333,000 2,333,000 2,333,000 2,333,000 2.333.000 2,333,000 x333.000 2,=,000 41,98/,000 13 Requlremenb 9]3,Se].000 98].J35,000 325,018,000 aN.032.000 306,82J,000 9]2,110,000 alx5ee,0DD a01,083.000 ].018,256.0DD 14 Revenu..Requlmmant 2,945.000 101049,000 6,912,000 53.421.000 4.855.000 21,999,000 8,033,000 101,B33,000 419,096,000 Accumutt0 Fund$: 15 aeginningol Year 515,705.000 518,80.0w 528.699.000 585,811p00 639,032,000 643,007,000 6a6,0e0,ow 76,919,m0 437,757,000 1a End of Year 516,650,000 528,699,000 585,611.000 639,032,000 643,887,000 a050e0,000 751.010,000 850,852,00D 06,052,000 17 Reserve Poioy 523,513.000 503.088,000 500,423,00D 497,024,000 408,714,000 462.734,000 470,575,000 475,246,000 Gnar servim User F.e. 19 Avg SFR Annual User Fee $295.00 $295,00 $285.00 $29600 $29500 $285.00 a28600 $295.00 34.124.00 19 Fem ales.Change 0.00% 0,00% 0.00% 0,00% 0,00% G.M 0.0019 0,00% 20 Equivalent Derailing UnBs 922.100 925,300 928,500 931,700 934,900 038.100 9I.= 944,500 21 SFR Correction Fee $2,850 $2.850 $2,850 $2,850 $2.850 $2.860 $x850 $2,850 22 Ovbtn4ing COPS 411.546.951,000 $1.486,271000 $1.435.520,000 $1,377,500,000 $1,311,801,OOD $1,251,609,000 $1,1B8,5J1,000 $1,122.636,DOD COP Roll 23 Sr Lt.Cos.M.,Mtn 1.25 175 1.62 1.79 182 183 1.80 1.80 1.92 25 Accidental Been,1.25 1.75 162 1 79 1.82 1.83 1.08 1.88 1.92 Net IuMhun for retlo. 271]72,000 273,524,000 176,988,000 281.893.000 285,122.000 288]55,000 290.372,000 296,926,000 Jr use®1.5% - - - - - - Srlienservlm 155,487,000 169,236.000 154.757,000 154.703,000 156,115.000 154.531,000 154,492,000 154,472,000 G:%xm1.4tNn1210baeea DRAG rotated 20039tm 14(e).3 s C 4/16/2003 6:22 ABA Orange County Sanitation District Summary Cash Flow Projections, Entire Collection System Validated CIP & Existing Reserve Policy 20% Maximum Rate Increase Preliminary Preanincry Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Preliminary Pre ninary P®If.i.q Preliminary toy.. EldheteOPe 3 032^ 0a05 05-06 Os� 02-0e OEM o91D 10,11 1112 law Revenue.: 1 General User Fee. T/,884,WO 93J97,000 112,959,0W 135,855,0)) 163,425,000 198,824,000 236.4111.000 284,825,000 285,55aoW 288,481,000 1ame21,OW 2 Pmmilled User F. 5,329,000 8,129,OW 8,3290W 6,329,0W 6,329,000 6,329,000 6,J290W B,J29,OW 6,32B4OW 6,3291000 0,2B0,000 3 PedleM T9ee. W.1W,W0 30,918,OW 39,694,OW 40,488,000 41,2B8,OW 42,124,000 42,N%OOD 43,825,000 414.7021000 46,06.0m 411,782,W0 4 New COP I.. - 2S%OW,WD - 320,OW,OW - 370,000,000 - 220,009,00D - W,OW,OW - 1A4%OW,0W 5 Inlere.l Revenue. 31,199,OW 34,319,000 34,146,000 30.905,000 29,146,000 30,420,90 29,388,000 29,588,11DO 21,011,001) 2D,261,000 304.000,WO 0 COnneo6W Fee. 5,824,WD 9,12g000 911201000 9.12D,000 91120,000 9.1W.ODO 9,120,W0 9,12gaeo 9,1m.em 9,1W,WO 87,904,OOD 1 Other Revenue. 23,528,WO 32,428,000 02,626,000 111=61000 21,529,OW 14,928,000 14,526,000 11,umoo 11,028,OW 11,528 W0 225,180,00 B Revenue. 463,516,000 219,909,000 S64,626,OW 238,925,000 BW,B48,OW 29B,545,000 558,]4],000 365,323,00D 414.4113,000 365,335,000 4,152,422,OW Reauln meeW 9 Opera Mlco Exp 81,080,000 W,SW.WO 89,160,DOD 93.050.000 113,11110.000 ".=,No 94,9601000 95,560,000 88,080,000 98,BW,OW 824,300,0DO 10 Oep6el lmpmvement Pmpmm 121.01.000 210,440,000 308,765,000 302,875,000 219,233,000 220,266.000 251,470,000 232,408,000 161,852,DDD 95,996,000 2,191,025,01ND Repl.Rehab 6 Ref11r8 27.001 38,800000 65.BW,OW 11 COP Serbs 610%.SO 36,985.000 50,250,000 62,898,000 75,885,000 90,701,000 1O5,W9,OW 114,384,000 123,414,OD0 125,467,000 121,OOeOOO 914,9W,WO 12 Other Reaulne ere 2,333.000 2,M3,W0 3,339,OW 2,339,OW 2933.DW 2,O39,W0 2,933,WD 2,339,W0 2,333,000 2,J3J,WO 29.330,OW 13 Reaulrememn 247.n9.000 a49,W9,W0 461,154,0D0 473,933,000 "O.I 8,W0 430,616,000 463,156,000 453,113,WD 412,212,ODO 360,800,000 4,119,091,000 14 Revenue.-Reaulmmeet, 210,222,W0 (129.624,000) IM.7n,OW (235,00 ,MO) 174,115,OW (13103,00 ) 95,591,000 (00,360,00D 1.691,0W 5.535,000 33,336.W0 Ammulehmi Funds: 15 Bwmriigol YeOr 437,757,OW 853,864.00D W4,31o.OW 618,032,000 413,024,90D 581,739,WD 458,888,000 55 .W.W0 463,867,OW 465,550,000 431,75rO00 18 End Of Year 653,884.000 524,310,0W 646,032,000 413,024,000 587,139,OW 459,600,000 552,257,00D Seaal2,OW 4W,BBB.WO 411,OB;OW 471,083,000 17 Rmerve Polley 438.459,000 35).)02,000 398,780,000 403,4n.00D 450,245,OW 450.362,000 472138,OW 483,821,000 A"AAA OW,59),WO 4W,S47,W0 Sewer Send,User Fees: 18 Avg SFRAnnuel User Fee SB1.50 $105.00 6128.00 $151.00 6181.00 6217.W $WD.OD 629O.DD 6290.00 62W.00 19 P..Ma9 cmw 9.38% 20.00% 20.OWS6 19.84% 19.82% 19.8914 19.82% 11.54% 0.00% O.W% 20 EWlveted Cvrel6ng Unit, BW.100 893,300 BW,WO 899,700 9W,9W Sol.= WB,WD 912,W0 915,10D g18,W0 21 SFR Connection Fee $1.820 62,550 $2.850 92.85D 82.851) $2.850 62,65D USED $2.00 $2,850 22 Oubtending COPS "39,975,000 6824,923.000 6933,226,000 6912,447,WD 61,2W,473,OW 61,232,509,000 B1A22,928,000 51,388,5420W $1,340,811,Wo 61,303,29scoo COP R.W. 23 Sr Uen Covelge,Min 115 2sS 2.65 2.79 1.92 1.95 1." 2.13 2.19 2.14 2.12 25 AddBfonal BOMB 125 2.55 2,65 2.79 1.92 1.95 1.94 2.13 2.19 2.14 2.12 Net Revenue.for reepe 89,450000 133.U9,000 175,116.00D 145,885.000 116,986,000 205,185,00D 243,787,00D 289,763,000 260,343,00D 269,875,DOD Jr lien a 7596 - - - Sr lien.mv9a 38,995,000 50,250,OW 62,096,000 75,WS,OW 90,707.000 105,839,00D 114,304.DW 123,414.00 125,462,OW 127,009 DOD G:Mrcel.oadn121 Pa8eed DRAG related 20021hem 14(e).3 4116=3 8:22 AM Orange County Sanitation District Summary Cash Flow Projections, Entire Collections System Pmlimin e, Preliminary PreOminary Presninery Prelindnery Prel0nlnery Preliminery Preliminary Grand Sid Oaers bw. 1" 1S14 1LU ti16 18-17 17_18 L&L 19-20 Told! Revenues: 1 Generel User Fees 257,409,000 288,337,000 269,285,000 2]0,193,0w 271.121.000 2]2,049,000 222,977,000 2T3,905,000 3,978,8TT,000 2 P9nnloed User Fees 9,329,000 8,329,000 6,328,DUU 6,329,00D 9,329,000 9,329,000 6,329,000 8,329,000 113,922,000 3 Properly Taxss 48,508,00D 47,430,000 48,387,000 49.355,000 50,342,000 51,MD'a 0 52,376,000 53.424.000 816,941,000 4 New COP Issues - - _ _ _ - 1.240,000,000 5 Interest R.nuw 28,104,000 29,851,000 M,188,000 37,871.000 41,124,000 43,555,000 48.00.000 55,880,000 62;131,000 6 ConnecSon Fees 9,120,000 9,120,000 9,120.000 9,1m,000 9.120,000 9,120,000 9,1w.wo 911M.000 180,a64,000 7 OBbr Revenue 11,421M)00 11,429,000 11,728,OOD 12,128.000 12,528.000 12.428,000 11,828.000 11,820,000 320.e .Ohd 8 Revenues 398,111HI.R 3]2503,000 3]8,01],000 M.M,000 390,584.000 394,830,000 401,070,000 410,268,000 7,253,639,000 Requirement: 9 Oper&Mesa Exp 103,760,000 los,no.w0 104,980.wo 105,560,000 108.36O000 10T,3 'wO 109.260,000 109,000,000 1.T3,080,000 10 Cep9ellmprwament Pn . ".sR000 45,908,400 48,000,000 30,]38,000 28,419,000 31,792,000 14,414,000 21,580.000 2,495,163,000 Rep1.Rehab&ReMIE 39,800,000 40,000,wo 14,800.000 34,700,000 93,400,000 16,100,000 33,100,000 13,800,000 411,400,000 11 COP Service 6.0%,30M 12],08],000 140,838,000 126,3V.000 120,303,000 12T.715,000 128,131,000 128,092,000 1M.072,000 1,941,219,000 12 Omer Requirement 2.3".00D 2,333.000 2,333,00D 2.333,000 2,333,000 2,333,000 2.333.000 2,333.000 41,994000 13 Requirement 344.187,000 M.335,000 208,616,000 305,832,000 350=.O00 .U9,719,000 M.199,0110 272,053,00D 6,663.656,000 14 Revenuesftequlrement 24,M1.000 33,166.000 $1,401,000 79,364,000 M.337,000 51,114,000 116.Bn,o00 13],613,00t) 589,983,000 A xnulaed Funds: 15 Beginntg WYear 471,00.000 495,884,000 629,032,000 010A33,000 689.]9],000 M2,134,000 Tn9,24O000 a90,122,000 437.757,000 18 Endgl Year 485,884,000 529,032,000 610,433,000 889,797.000 M2,134,000 ]]3,24a,000 aw,127,cw 1,02],]40,000 1,02),]40,000 17 Reserve Policy 48B,SBS,000 447,501,000 444,80o.ow 441,816,000 435,150,000 428,852,000 425,410,000 42$853,000 Saeot S0nks User Fees' 18 Avg SFR Mnuel User Fee $290,00 $maw %!90.00 $290.0n 1090.00 $now $290.OD $290.00 $4,312.50 19 Peoentge clen a 000% 0.00% 0.0096 0.00% 0.00% 000% 0.00% 0.00% 20 EquNetM Dwelling Unit 922,100 925,300 828.500 931,700 M.900 938,100 941,300 944.500 21 SFR Cgnnac80n Fee $2,850 $2.050 $2,850 $0,850 E2,850 $2.850 $2.850 $2,950 22 Outstanding COPS $1,261.637.000 $1,208.382,000 EL 181,3BB,000 $1,109,48],000 51,049,958,000 $998,988.000 $941.282,000 $882,733,000 COP Rollo 23 Sr Den Cowards,Min 1.25 2.69 190 216 2.21 2.23 2,28 2.32 2.39 25 AddiBOltl Bonds,1.25 2.09 1,90 2.16 2.21 223 2.28 2.32 Z39 Net Revenues for mow 265,198,O0 268,243,000 273,057,000 278,436.000 284,204,000 287,470,000 292,018,000 301.206.000 - Jr then®].5% - - - - - - - Sr Hun servlce 127.087,000 140.836.000 126,357,000 126,303,000 12],]15,000 126,131,NO 126,092.000 126,072,000 0 G:bxml.dt61m21DbuaedlPRAG rend 2002stem 14(e).3 4/16/2003 8:22XM Orange County Sanitation District Summary Cash Flow Projections, Entire Collection System Validated CIP & Existing Reserve Policy 25% Rate Increase Poellminery Praliminery Plsllmilnry ProllmiR., Preliminary IWIntlnery Pretsnlnay P.H.1tay Preliminary PreOMnery 10 Yser fat Dufrell9B 2ooz-93 9245 94:25 Q0 08-07 gzm 2EU Wit) 10-11 11-12 191e1 Revenue.: 1 Oenarel User Fees 7),BBe,000 $7.818,000 12],821,000 153,840.000 185.097,000 222,001,000 254,604,000 asla i.000 258.398.000 2W.202,000 1,685080.000 2 Perm0led User Fees 6,32g000 0,029,000 8,320,000 8,320,000 8.329.000 6,329,000 6,329,000 8.Mitti 0 8,328.000 6,329.000 63.290,000 3 Prepsdy Twos 35,153,000 39,616,000 3a8B4000 40,488,000 41,298,000 42,124,000 42,986,000 43,828,000 44.702,000 45,590,000 417,762.000 4 New COP Issue. 280,000,000 - 3001000.000 - 306.000,000 - W0,000,000 - - 1,0115.01 5 Interest Finnish... 91,798,000 34,440,000 $4,114,000 31,179,000 28,880,000 29,980,000 30,088,000 90,490,000 28.534,000 25,348,000 302,847,000 B Connection Fear 5,824,000 9.120,000 9,120.MO 9,120,000 9,1ID,000 9,120,000 9,120,000 9,120,000 9,120.000 0,120,000 87,904,000 7 Coal Revenue. 23,528,000 37,4Q8,000 82,8280W 18,326,0as 21,528,000 14.928,000 14,526,000 11,928,000 11,626.0st 11,528.000 225.78U,000 B Rerenu.. 083,516,000 32I,049,000 5)4,)08000 25],193,000 696,152,000 335,382,000 557,633,000 357.02.00 351,7W.00e 956,211,000 4,08),943,000 Roeulremenl.: 9 Open B Mt.Evp 84.000,000 85560.000 69,180.m 93,080,000 93,660,000 04,380,000 94,9N,000 95,5110,000 960Be,000 00,880eats 924.300,000 ID Capitol lmpm.em0M Prepnm 121.901.000 210440.000 308,785,000 302,676.000 279.233.000 228,268.000 251,479.000 232,408,000 161'sa2,000 95.008,000 2,191,035.000 Real.Rehab 8 Refuels 2)1000.000 38,800,000 fi5,s00,000 11 COP SeMra 6.0%,30M 38,995,000 50.250.000 62,0116.000 74,265.000 B% W,000 99.839.000 100.)84,000 115,014,000 llsW7,0W 114,609,000 682,426,000 12 Other Reaulremants 2,333000 2,333000 2,333,000 2.333,000 2333000 2,333000 2333.000 2.333,0a0 2333001) 2333,000 23.330.000 13 ReeulremerNS 247,280,000 Ussibi'm 459,351,000 472,333,O110 401 033,000 423.019,000 455,650,000 449,913,000 402,312,000 346,400,000 4,066,8101.000 14 Ream.. fh,nfireresnts 218,227,000 (129,514,000) 114,352,000 (219,140,000) 136,219,000 (98,438,000) 102,077,000 (B8,221,000) (47,803,000) 6.811.000 752,000 Acoumvletsd Fund.: 15 Beglnobodyen 437,757,000 653,984,000 528.450.000 642.60?000 427,582,000 563.001,000 465,445,000 567,522 NO 479,301,000 431,895,000 43]]57,000 16 End.fYwr 853,9MCW 525,450,000 642,502.000 427,502.000 583.881,000 405,445,000 567,522,090 479.301,000 431,898.000. 430,599,993 438.508.000 17 Resolve Pollry 438,459,000 356,802.000 395,180.000 400004,000 434,998,000 43g445,000 40,518,000 443,351,000 433,734,0c0 434,'01.001 434,403,000 So,same.User Faea 18 Avg SFR Annul User Fag $87.50 $10950 $137.00 $171.00 6206.00 6246.00 $280.00 6280.00 $260.00 628100 19 Parishes,Chuh, 938% 25.14% 25.11% 2482% 20A714 10.42% 13.82% 0.00% 0.00% 0a0% 20 ERulvel.nt Dwelling Units 690,100 893,300 696.500 899,700 002.900 908,1m 202.300 912.500 015,700 918.900 21 SFR Connncen.Fels $1,820 $2,850 $2.550 52.950 $2,850 $2.850 $2850 3?850 $2,050 $2659 22 OustaMing COP. W39.975000 $624,923.000 3813,229,000 S1192.700.000 $1.175.904,000 $1,140,138,000 $1.320,820.000 $1.287,839.000 $1,241,894,000 31,203,356000 COP Rellas 23 5,Llen Co.er98,Min 1.25 2,55 274 2.99 2.21 2.30 2.34 2.46 2¢1 225 2.26 25 Ad4Non it Bonds,1.26 2,55 2,74 2.99 221 2.30 2.34 2.46 227 225 2.28 Net Re..nue.tW We 99.458,000 137,489,000 185,546,000 164.133,000 190,282,000 231,022,000 252.673.000 281,532,000 258,649,000 250.551000 Jr lien®).5% - - - - - - - Sr Use entrance 38.995,000 W.250.000 62.096,000 74265.000 86.W7. 00 99,839,aM lm.7 g000 115,014,000 115,0117,000 114,808,000 G:\ezcel.dta\Bn\210lstreed\PRAG related 2002Utem 14(e).3 4/16/2003 6:22 AM Orange County Sanitation District Summary Cash Flow Projections, Entire Collections System Preliminary PreBminary Prelhninery Preliminary Preffinimry Preliminary PreBminary Prelhnlnary Bound Hot RSeotedon 1213 1114 14-15 1s-1e 16-17 1234 1%10 1e-2o Towl Revenues: 1 OBnerel User Fees 250,108,000 258,084,000 258,080,000 280,81e,000 281,n2,000 292,BBB,ow 263,564,000 204,460,000 3,975,052,W0 2 PelmMed Used Fees 6,320,000 e,329,000 0,3n,000 6,320000 8.329.000 6,329.000 6,320,000 5,320,ow 113.9n.000 3 Property Tessa dews'W0 41,438,000 40,387,000 48,355,000 50,342,000 51,340,UW 52,370,000 53,424,000 B1B4O41.ow 4 New COPlssues - - - - - - - 1,055,00,000 5 Interest Revenues 28,304,000 28,070,000 31.488,000 38,254.0DD 39,695,000 42,11e,000 0,102,OW 54,812,000 W8,308,W0 6 Connesdon F. B,1 W,OW 0,1m.mo 6,120,000 0,120,000 0,120,W0 0,130,W0 9.120.000 8,120,000 150,884,000 T Other Revenue. 11,428,000 11,428,000 11.728.000 12.128,000 12,528,W0 12,928,W0 11,820,OW 11.828,000 320s04,W0 8 Revenues W.8n,000 381,460,000 387,032,000 374,062,000 370,686,000 304,010,000 380,319,000 398,5y3,000 1,01,671,W0 Requlremenb: 9 Oper O Mies Ey 103,760,000 104,200,000 104.0801000 105'"o0W 108,380,000 10T,3W.W0 10B.M.000 100.OB01000 1.n300,000 10 C.Pibl Improvement Program n,20/.000 45,008,000 48,088,000 36,738.000 28,410.000 31.7Q.000 14,414,000 21,588,000 2,40.163,000 Repl,Rehe06 Refurh 33,800,000 40,0D0,000 14,800,000 34,700,000 93,400.000 76.100.000 33,100.000 13.6001000 411,400,000 11 COP Senrce S.M.30 na 114,687,000 126,438,000 113.957.000 113.003.000 115,315,OW 113,731,000 113,882,000 113,872,000 1.789.810,000 12 OIOer RequiremenLL 2,3JJ,000 2,J33,OW 3.J3J,000 2,333,000 2,333,000 2.333.000 2,333,000 2.333.000 41,004,000 13 Requlrenonte 331,787,000 326,035,000 284,218,000 003,232,000 345,827,000 331.310.000 211,108,000 250,253,000 6,512,256,000 14 RevenuosRequiremenU 25,W0,000 34,504ow 62,810.000 801830,000 33,858,000 52,604000 110.M.000 138,3"Aw 559,416,000 Accumulated Funds: 15 BeginnOgof Year 438.500.000 464,500.000 400,133,000 581,040,000 W2,n0,000 808,938,W0 749.332.000 087,852,000 437,757,000 16 End of Yee, 4B450Q000 499,133,000 581,349,000 602,778,000 080,030poo 148,332,000 667,851 1,00I,172,000 1,0 ,1T2,0o0 11 Reserve Posey 444.019.SN 425,725.000 423,032,W0 420.452.000 414,011.000 407.951,000 404,168,000 402,473,000 Busier Sonow User Fee.: 18 An SFR Annual Used Fee $280.00 W80.00 $280.00 $280.00 $260.00 $280.00 mow $280A0 34,31T00 10 Pemente80 Chong. 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20 Equlvalenl OwsllMg Unft on.100 925,3W 028,5W 031,100 934.800 338,100 941.300 W'500 21 SFR Conneedon Fee $2.850 $2.850 $2.850 $2.850 $2,850 $2,860 $2,050 $2.850 22 Ouldending COP. $1,165,023.000 $1.112,628,00 $1,088,805,000 111.010.846,000 $062,566,000 $911,902,000 $858,003,000 $802.993,000 COP Rados 23 St U.Co .,Min 1.25 2]2 2.00 2.30 IN 2,37 2.43 2.48 2.56 25 Additional Bonds,1.25 2,22 200 2.30 2.36 2.37 2.43 2.48 2.55 Net Revenueafarrat.. 254111.000 251,209,000 262,072,000 288,502,000 2]%M.000 218,850,000 282,056PW 200,513,000 Jr Iles®7.5% - Srlleneend. 114,687,000 128,438,000 113,051,WD 113,903,M 115,316.000 113,731,00D 113.622,000 113,972,000 GAexcel.dta\fin1210tstreedlPRAG related 20024tem 14(a).3 Annual Caah Flow Requirement N N w W o O J J� 4 I m y < v o I J� J� C ?Oj4, 1 Jp 1 ,4J; NI �T )T Jj I FAHIR COMMITTEE Mee0ng Date TOBd.or .Dir. 04,09,03 09/23/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-26 Item 14(n Orange County Sanitatlon District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR ISSUING UP TO $280 MILLION IN NEW CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Direct staff to issue up to $280 million in new fixed-rate Certificates of Participation (COP) debt; 2. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement with Public Resources Advisory Group, for a two-year period for FY03/04, providing for financial advisory services, for an amount not to exceed $75,000; and, 3. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to provide bond counsel services in an amount not to exceed $125,000. SUMMARY In support of the District's Strategic Plan capital improvement program, the Board-approved the issuance of$280 million of new Certificates of Participation (COP) debt within the 2002-03 Adopted Budget. Approval of the recommended actions above will direct staff to begin the $280 million fixed rate debt issuance process and will authorize staff to retain the financial advising firm of Public Resources Advisory Group, and the bond counsel firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to assist in the debt issuance. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY In accordance with the District's Board-adopted Debt Policy, the District will restrict long-term borrowing to capital improvements that cannot be financed from current revenue. In accordance with the 1989 Master Plan, one-half of all future long-term capital improvements will be funded from long-term debt with the remaining cost funded from capital improvement reserves and current revenues. This policy will assist in the leveling out of user fee rates over time and avoid any spiked increases in the short term. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. However, professional services fees would be reimbursed by cost savings. ❑ Not applicable (information item) C�Mm dSOWVppopY SNtlrgTTamgonrylmmvl FlM UQFEVum 14(9.Nv 1w COR = a M:�e Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION r The District currently has three series of COPS outstanding comprising a total par amount of$365.0 million. The following table describes each COP in detail. EXISTING COP FINANCING PROGRAM Outstanding Debt Interest Rate Par Amount` Structure Mode Series 2000 $208,900,000 Subordinate Daily Variable Rate Refunding(1) Series 1993 42.900,000 Open Senior Synthetic Fixed Rate(3) Refunding(2) Series 1992 113,175,000 Open Senior Synthetic Fixed Rate�sl Refunding(2) Total $364,975,0 'As of April 1,2003. (1)Series 2000 COPS refunded the Series A,B,and C issued between 1990 and 1992. (2)Series 1992 and 1993 COPs refunded the Sedes 1986 and a portion of the Series"B"COPs. (3)Variable rate debt swapped to a fixed rate through maturity. The Series 2000 refunded the $179.7 million outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series 'A" "B" and "C" COPs, and reimbursed the District for improvements made to the wastewater treatment system. The 1993 Refunding COPS was issued to refund $39.7 million of the Series "B" COPs. The Series 1992 Refunding COPS refunded the 1986 COPS ($107 million) issued on behalf of District Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The 1992 Refunding COPS also refunded approximately$38.4 million of the Series "B" COPS, issued in 1991. The District's three outstanding COPS are organized into a two-tier lien structure; meaning that there are two different claims on the revenues pledged to fund debt service payments on the COPS. The following table displays the combined gross debt service cash flows for the District's five COPS through final maturity in FY 2030-31. DEBT SERVICE STRUCTURE C Mmumems and Sedln0apape\Loch SeMrpo\Temporary Inlemet RISSZLOFEVIem 14(n.Naw leeue COPAm e>v.aad:anone Page 2 50 45 40 w 35 o29 13Open Sr.Lien(Series'92&'93) 20 IS ■Subordinate Lien 0 5 0 p� y 01'L" 'YC�S'I�o'L(�1 'LC�6 1CY) b�\0 'L�\\ 'L9\'L'0\' 'LP\b 'LD\S 'LD\b'0%1 'L�\4 1,\9 'L�,)0 N&\ 'L0•)'L'Ie Te To bo'1e '1.9ti4'1e 'L030 Fiscal Year End Strategy The newly revised Strategic Plan capital improvement program requiring approximately $2.2 billion over the next ten years, of which one-half the cost, or$1.1 billion, is to be financed through long-term borrowings in accordance with the District's long-term debt fiscal policy. The issuance of $280 million of COP debt this fiscal year has been slated for the reimbursement of capital improvements constructed over the past three years, and a share of those to be constructed over the next two years. A total of up to $1.1 billion in COP debt issuance is being proposed over the next ten years with a new issuance scheduled for every other year. These financings are needed early in the 20-year capital improvement program because the bulk of the construction is scheduled during the next ten years. Due to interest rates currently being at the lowest level than in any other point in time over the last thirty-years, staff is proposing that this new COP issue be a fixed rate debt issuance. In addition to the low rate environment, a fixed rate issuance will minimize the amount of reserves required to be on hand to support variable rate debt while maintaining the District's Aa credit ratings from the three credit rating agencies. Finance Team and Timeline It is proposed that financial advisory and bond counsel services be retained to more fully develop and implement the restructuring proposals discussed above. It is requested that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee authorize staff to engage Public Resources Advisory Group (PRAG) and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe for this project. Both fines have developed an extensive knowledge base about the financial and legal structures of the District's existing COP issues; together with a working knowledge of completing similar restructurings. In recent months, PRAG has demonstrated their expertise in developing and analyzing opportunities to modernize the District's existing reserve policy. They have been instrumental in developing the proposals discussed in this report. Compensation for C:Nxumenb sd 44%ngs�opaLLo Se Ns\Temporaryltle l FIe8\OLN3FEJlem 1411).Ne Wua COP.Euc R.A.: ersoee Page 3 PRAG has been negotiated through an RFP process conducted in December 2001 as a transaction based fee in the amount of $75,000 for the issuance of fixed rate debt. With the assistance of PRAG, staff is proposing to issue the new$280 million COP debt through a competitive sale as opposed to a negotiated sale. Due to the fact that this is a proposed fixed rate debt issuance, and not a large, irregular, and difficult-to-place issue, both staff and PRAG believe that the debt can be issued at a lower interest rate and at lower issuance costs than what could be obtained through a competitive sale. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has provided legal services on various matters related to the District's existing COP financing program, and is therefore, intimately familiar with the legal documents and structures of the District's COP issues. Most recently, they have assisted staff efforts related to the issuance of the Series 2000 COPS. Costs for legal services would be reimbursed through cost savings upon successful completion of the issuance. Given the knowledge and experience that both firms can contribute to the proposed issuance, it is estimated that it can be accomplished in approximately 120 days, as illustrated by the following timeline. Staff would implement the negotiated professional services agreement with PRAG and negotiate a professional services agreement Orrick, Herrington & Sulciffe, for execution by the General Manager. > Negotiate professional services agreement with bond counsel May D Finalize debt service and cash flow modeling > Develop legal documents June > Develop rating agency presentation Develop disclosure documents(Official Statement) > Marketing the Sale of the COPS July ➢ Conduct rating agency presentations > Conduct institutional investor presentations Finalize legal and disclosure documents > Sale of the COPs through an Open Bid Process August > Execute$280 million Fixed-Rate COP Issue 9 > Investment of Bond Proceeds > Debt Administration ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None C:LL .n.and UWIAIopaLLxY SW T.m .l I.—M FYee UFR.e 141SN.w I.,COP.. w ..d. ezeae Page 4 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT March 10, 2003, 4:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 4:30 p.m. on March 10, 2003. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Phil Anthony, Chairman Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 3 Paul Cook Larry Kraemer Jr. Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD Staff OCWD Directors: OCWD Staff Blake Anderson Denis Bilodeau Bill Everest Ellen Ray Wes Bannister Mike Markus OCWD General Counsel Joel Kuperberg ITEMS TOO LATE TO BE AGENDIZED None INFORMATIONAL ITEM 1. Tour if the AWTF Facilities Committee Chair Anthony reported that a tour would be given of the future Groundwater Replenishment System facility and the Southeast Barrier Pipeline. Mr. Mike Markus, Program Manager, led the group on a tour of the existing site pointing out the location of the Initial Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution Contract and the future location of the Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) on both the OCWD and OCSD sites. A bus tour was then given of the Southeast Barrier Pipeline Project, which just recently began construction. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 14, 2003 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. - 1 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS raeeing Dare To Bd.of Dir. 9/23/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number _ 15(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-09, a Joint Resolution of the Boards of Directors of Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District, declaring the Groundwater Replenishment System will comply with all conditions recommended by the Hearing Officer of the State of California Department of Health Services. SUMMARY • The California State Department of Health Services (DHS) held a Public Hearing for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) on February 4, 2003. • At that Hearing, several commenters raised the concern that DHS would not have continuing oversight over the GWRS • Those commenters were uncomfortable with relying solely on the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to adopt and enforce the conditions that DHS recommends to assure the safety of the GWRS. • This resolution is in response to these concerns raised at the public hearing. • The Joint Cooperative Committee requested that staff develop a resolution that would commit Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)to abide by the conditions recommended by DHS, regardless of whether they are adopted by the RWQCB as permit requirements for the GWRS. • At their April 14, 2003 meeting, the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) recommended approval of the resolution by the OCW D and OCSD Boards. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY There is no cost associated with this action. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2002-03 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 157) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) C: mumsnuend seningsVopeLLacmSmngs omporary Inlemel FIIesWL"FEWem ISIc)GWRS Jain)RecoluLon Ett RevW V a Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the attached April 14, 2003 JCC Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives to the request made by the Joint Cooperative Committee to develop this resolution. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the Groundwater Replenishment System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCW D on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS I. April 14, 2003 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Joint Resolution of the Boards of Directors of OCWD and OCSD 2. Joint Resolution of the Board of Directors of OCW D and OCSD WTS:sa G:\niglobaMgenda DmM ReponWoint BoardsW-36 dhs ms AR 04-23.doo FIDo.0 .nntl FIIOW'"Mt.m 161d.OWFe Jdnl R...,d. e.w d,Ma Page 2 Agenda Item # 6 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: April 14, 2003 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCW D/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501.5049-722.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: N/A From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Bill Everest Subject: ADOPT JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ON DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES (DHS) COMPLIANCE SUMMARY The Resolution is in response to concerns raised at the Department of Health Services (DHS) Public Hearing for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System on February 4, 2003. Al that Hearing, some commenters raised the concern that DHS may not have continuing oversight over the GWR System. Those commenters were uncomfortable with relying solely on the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to adopt and enforce the conditions that DHS recommends to assure the safety of the GWR System. To alleviate the concerns of these commenters, the Committee requested that staff develop a Resolution that would commit OCW D and OCSD to abide by the conditions recommended by DHS, regardless of whether they are fully adopted by the RWQCB as permit requirements for the GWR System. The attached Resolution is submitted for your review and consideration. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for the April 23 OCW D & OCSD Board meetings: Recommend both Boards adopt Resolution agreeing to comply with all conditions recommended by the Department of Health Services for the Groundwater Replenishment System. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS The DHS Public Hearing for the GWR System was held on February 4, 2003. While the majority of the commenters favor the project, some voiced concerns about coordination between DHS and the RWQCB. In the State's regulatory process, DHS - 1 . Agenda Item # 6 , sends recommendations and conditions for the permit in the form of a Findings of Fact to the RWQCB, which is the agency that actually issues and enforces the permit. The RWQCB, however, is not specifically obligated under State law to include all of the DHS recommendations in the permit. The commenters were uncomfortable with relying solely on the RWQCB to adopt and enforce the conditions that DHS recommends to assure the safety of the GW R System. To alleviate the concerns of these commenters, the Joint Cooperative Committee requested staff develop a Resolution that would commit OCW D and OCSD to abide by the conditions recommended by DHS, regardless of whether they are fully adopted by the RWQCB as permit requirements for the GW R System. Staff has prepared the attached Resolution for your review and consideration. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS None. - 2 - OCSD RESOLUTION NO. 03-09 OCWD RESOLUTION NO. JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WHEREAS,Orange County Water District(OCWD)and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)plan to jointly build and operate the Groundwater Replenishment System(GWR System) to provide a reliable high quality supply of water for groundwater recharge; and WHEREAS,the Department of Health Services held a public hearing on February 4, 2003 to consider the project and receive public comments; and WHEREAS,the Department of Health Services must make a finding that the GWR System will not degrade the quality of the water in the receiving aquifers for domestic use; and WHEREAS,the Department of Health Services will recommend to the Regional Water Quality Control Board conditions for approval of the project to assure that water quality and public health are protected;and WHEREAS,the Regional Water Quality Control Board is not specifically obligated under State statute to include all of the Department of Health Services recommended conditions in the permit issued for the project; and WHEREAS,comments made by concerned citizens at the public hearing emphasized the importance of having the GWR System comply with all Department of Health Services conditions to assure that it is safe. NOW,THEREFORE,OCWD and OCSD hereby jointly resolve to comply with all conditions recommended by the Hearing Officer of the State of California Department of Health Services for the GWR System, including source control,treatment and monitoring to assure that the water produced is at all times safe, wholesome and potable. ADOPTED THIS 23rd day of April, 2003 ADOPTED THIS 23rd day of April,2003 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT By: By: Denis Bilodeau, President Shirley McCracken, Chair ATTEST ATTEST By: By: Janice Durant, Board Secretary Penny Kyle, Board Secretary 1 j BOARD OF DIRECTORS meeang Date TGgad3Orr Dir. AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number Isfd) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, SITE LEASE BETWEEN THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve and authorize execution of Real Property Lease Agreement with the Orange County Water District, for a 6.69 acre parcel at the intersection of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the City of Fountain Valley, for the construction and operation of advanced water treatment facilities, commencing March 1, 2003 and expiring 30 years after the Groundwater Replenishment System becomes operational, in connection with Article 25 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project, at a cost of $1.00 per year, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GRS) and the Green Acres Project states that Orange County Water District (OCWD) and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will enter into a lease agreement for property owned by OCSD upon which advanced water treatment facilities will be built. • This action is to approve the lease. • The Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) recommended approval of the lease by the OCW D and OCSD Boards at their April 14, 2003 meeting. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY There is no capital cost associated with this action. OCWD is to pay $1.00 per year for thelease. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2002-03 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 157) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION C.Occieeii and S.Wr, apeLLncal Sesngs\Temporary Imeme,Fdee0LiQFEWem 15(d).GWfly Lease.Occ Revised: svlN Page 1 Please refer to the attached April 14, 2003 JCC Agenda Item Submittal. e ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives to the conditions of the joint agreement. Not approving the lease will hold up State grant and loan funds. CEGA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GW RS) was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Map Showing Leased Area 2. April 14, 2003 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Site Lease Between the OCWD and OCSD 3. Lease Agreement WTS:sa G:\WpAla\agmdMBG M Agentl Repods\E003 Boen1 Agentl Repoft\0403Jtem 15(d).GW RS Leae CN nb nM Settirgs`p.MeLLeeel SeNrye\Tenpoeery IMemel FlNsk`IKtFEVIam ISIUI.GWPS Iew.Ex ..„ .a, &I.. Page 2 A ++ •[ ..;. elf"-{ ?.'r '�,�rfr^. y _d Ti'� I ♦ . ! f y. 6.6i. Yi0 !IL7 tt- cr Iowl, r - lli. f JV tVol - �jr* a+t t ti -. a�..�a r7.r J. ..... 1:: .. - fo+ t:'3 1 'w :. -•.�7 1c r�t' � Y� e Agenda Item #4 % AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: April 14, 2003 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-5049-722-70.01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $1 per year From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: Required. Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: N/A CEQA Compliance: N/A Staff Contact: W. Sevenandt Subject: SITE LEASE BETWEEN THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FOR TREATMENT PLANT SITE SUMMARY The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project states that Orange County Water District (OCWD) and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will enter into a lease agreement for property owned by OCSD upon which advanced water treatment facilities will be built. This action is to approve the lease agreement. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for April 23 OCWD & OCSD Board meetings: Approve and authorize execution of lease between the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District in accordance with Article 25 of the Joint Exercise Of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project, for$1 per year, commencing on March 1, 2003, and expiring 30 years after the Groundwater Replenishment System becomes operational DISCUSSIOWANALYSIS Article 25 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project describes the lease of property and it is included below in its entirety. The referenced Exhibit E is repeated as an exhibit to the lease. A copy of the lease agreement is requested by the State to show OCWD has secured the property for the advance water treatment facilities. Without this approved lease, the State loans will be held up. - 1 - Agenda Item#4 25. Lease of Property On or before March 1, 2003, the Parties shall enter into a v lease ("Lease"), in a form that is mutually acceptable to the Parties, whereby the Sanitation District shall lease to the Water District the property described on Exhibit E attached hereto (the "Properly"). During the term of the Lease, the Water District shall use the Property for System-related purposes. The rent under the Lease shall be one dollar($1.00)per year. The rent is set at the nominal sum of one dollar($1.00)per year because the Sanitation District will otherwise receive adequate and substantial consideration from the Water District under this Agreement. As the landlord and property owner, the Sanitation District shall assist the Water District in obtaining any permits or approvals that the Water District may seek from governmental agencies in connection with the construction and operation of the AWT Facilities, the influent screening facilities, the landscaping and associated piping on the Property. Upon the Water District's request, the Sanitation District shall file or cause to be filed any application, documentation or information necessary to obtain such permits or govemmental approvals. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTION(S) October 2002 Approval of Joint Exercise Of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project by the Boards of Directors in October2002. - 2 - s V LEASE This Lease ("Lease") is entered into by and between the Orange County the Sanitation District (the "Sanitation District") and the Orange County the Water District (the "Water District"). The Sanitation District and the Water District are sometimes collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Parties,"and individually referred to as each "Party." The Lease shall be effective as of March 1, 2003. RECITALS A. The Sanitation District owns that certain real property situated in the City of Fountain Valley, County of Orange, State of California, as described on Exhibit"A"attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Property"). B. On November 12, 2002, the Parties entered into that certain Agreement entitled the "Joint Exercise Of Powers Agreement For The Development, Operation And Maintenance Of The Groundwater Replenishment System And The Green Acres Projecr ("GWRS Agreemenf'). Paragraph 25 of the GWRS Agreement requires the Parties to enter into a lease whereby the Sanitation District shall lease the Property to the Water District for purposes related to the Groundwater Replenishment System. This Lease is the lease referenced in Paragraph 25 of the GWRS Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing facts and of the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Lease and Use of the Prooertv. The Sanitation District does hereby lease to the Water District and the Water District does hereby hire and take the parcel or parcels of land described on Exhibit"A" hereto with the buildings and improvements now or hereafter erected thereon, with the specific agreement that this is a "net" Lease for the Sanitation District, and the Parties intend that all costs or expenses relating to the Property or arising out of this Lease are to be paid by the Water District. The Property is to be used exclusively for purposes related to the Groundwater Replenishment System, including but not limited to construction and operation of the AWT Facilities, the influent screening facilities, the landscaping and associated piping on the Property, as described in the GWRS Agreement. Any change in the use of the Property from that permitted in this paragraph without the prior written consent of the Sanitation District is absolutely prohibited. 2. Term. The term of this Lease shall commence on the effective date of this Agreement, and expire thirty (30) years after the "System" becomes "Operationar (as such terms are defined in the GWRS Agreement), subject to earlier expiration or termination pursuant to the GWRS Agreement. Y D 3. Rent. The Water District shall pay to the Sanitation District rent in the amount of one dollar ($1.00) per year. The rent is set at the nominal sum of one dollar ($1.00) per year because the Sanitation District will otherwise receive adequate and substantial consideration from the Water District under the GW RS Agreement. 4. Utilities. The Water District shall use the Property and each and every part thereof and the facilities, machinery and equipment therein at its own cost and expense, and shall pay or cause to be paid all charges for gas, electricity, light, heat, power, telephone, maintenance, landscaping services and other services used, rendered or supplied upon or in connection with the Property and each and every part thereof. 5. Repairs and Maintenance. The Water District shall, at its own expense, put, place and keep the Property in first class order and repair. The Water District shall promptly make any and all interior and exterior repairs and replacements necessary for that purpose, extraordinary as well as ordinary, whether or not such repairs or replacements shall be of structural nature, whether or not such repairs or replacements provide relatively greater benefit to the Sanitation District than to the Water District, whether or not such repairs or replacements can be said to be within the present contemplation of the Parties hereto and without regard to the length of the Lease tens, the cost of the repair or replacement or the degree of interference with the Water District's use while repairs or replacements are being made. 6. Hazardous Materials. The Water District shall not discharge or release, or permit the discharge or release, on or from the Property of any Hazardous Materials, as hereinafter defined. The Water District shall, at its own expense, clean up and remediate, to the satisfaction of the Sanitation District, any discharge or release by the Water District on or from the Property of any Hazardous Materials. For purposes of this Paragraph 6, any acts or omissions of the Water District, or by employees, agents, assignees, contractors or subcontractors of the Water District or by others acting for or on behalf of the Water District(whether or not they are negligent, intentional, willful or unlawful), other than the Sanitation District, its officers, employees, agents, assignees, contractors or subcontractors, shall be strictly attributable to the Water District. 7. Environmental Indemnity. Water District shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless the Sanitation District, and each of the Sanitation District's successors, from and against any and all claims, liabilities, penalties, fines, judgments, forfeitures, losses (including, without limitation, diminution in the value of the Property and damages for the loss of or restriction on the use of the Property), costs or expenses (including attomeys' fees, consultants' fees and experts' fees) arising out of or in connection with the Water District's use and occupancy of the Property, caused in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, by (a) the presence in, on, under or about the Property or any discharge or release by the Water District on or from the Property of any Hazardous Materials, (b) the use, analysis, storage, transportation, disposal, release, threatened release, discharge or generation by the Water District of Hazardous Materials in, on, under, about or from the Property, or (c) the Water District's failure to C:\Documents and sa"Ings\pope\LomI Settings\Tempmery Inteme FR9s\OLK3FBItem 15(d).2.Eoc Page 2 V comply with any Environmental Law. The Water District's obligations under this indemnification shall include, without limitation, whether foreseeable or unforeseeable, any and all costs incurred in connection with any investigation of any such conditions, and any and all costs of any repair, cleanup, detoxification or decontamination of the Property (including, without limitation, the soil and ground water on, under or about the Property), and the preparation and implementation of any closure, remedial action, or other plans in connection therewith. For the purposes of this Lease, each of the following terms shall have the meaning herein assigned to such tens which may, as the context requires, be expressed or applied in the singular or plural form thereof: (a) The term "Environmental Laws" means and includes, without limitation, any federal, state or local law, statute, regulation or ordinance pertaining to health, industrial hygiene or the environmental or ecological conditions, on, under or about the Property, including, without limitation, each of the following: the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. sec. 9601, at sec.; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended ("RCRA"), 42 U.S.C. sec. 6901, at seq.; the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. sec. 7401, at sec.; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. sec. 1251, at seq.; the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. sec. 2601, at sec.; the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to- Know Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. sec. 11001, at sec.; the National Environmental Policy Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C. sec. 4321, the Rivers and Harbours Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. sec. 401, at seg.; the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, 16 U.S.C. sec. 1531, et sue.; the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. sec. 703-12; the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, as amended, 29 U.S.C. sec. 651, at sec.; the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, 42 U.S.C. sec. 300(f), at sec.; the Federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. sec. 1801, at sec.; the rules, regulations and ordinances of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and all other agencies, boards, commissions and other governmental bodies and officers having jurisdiction over the Property or the use or operation thereof. (b) The term "Hazardous Materials" means: (1) petroleum, petroleum by-products, petroleum derivatives and any and all other hydrocarbons; (it) those substances which are or become Included within the definitions of"Hazardous Materials", "hazardous material", "toxic substances" or"solid waste" in any of CERCLA, RCRA, the Clean Air Act and the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (49 U.S.C.A. sec. 1801, at sec.) and in regulations promulgated pursuant thereto; (iii) those substances which are or become listed in the U.S. Department of Transportation Table or amendments thereto (49 CFR sec. 172.101 (1988) or by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (or any successor agency) as Hazardous Materials; (iv) those other substances, materials and wastes which are or become regulated under any applicable federal, state or local law, regulation or Q\Documem and Setgngs\pope\local Settlngs\Temp mry Intemet Fllea\OLK3FEVtem 15(d).2.doc Page 3 D ordinance, or by any federal, state or local governmental agency, board, commission or other governmental body, or which are or become classified as hazardous or toxic by any such law, regulation or ordinance; and (v) any material, waste or substance which is any of the following: asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, designated or listed as a"hazardous substance"pursuant to Sec. 1321(14) of the Clean Water Act, explosive or radioactive. 8. Access. The Sanitation District shall have access to the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the Property, including, but not limited to, taking measures reasonably necessary to evaluate the compliance of the Property with all applicable governmental statutes, regulations, ordinances, orders or guidelines relating, in any way, to the environment. Such measures may include taking samples of soil and groundwater and analyzing those samples. Such right of access, however, shall not be construed as obliging the Sanitation District to make any repairs to any part of the Property or as obliging the Sanitation District to make any such inspection. 9. Condition Of the Property. The Water District acknowledges that it has had, prior to entering into this Lease, the opportunity to inspect and investigate the Property to its complete satisfaction, including, but not limited to, the following: the physical condition of the Property, including the improvements thereon; the environmental condition of the Property, including any presence of Hazardous Materials; any covenants and restrictions, easements, zoning ordinances, building and use restrictions, and any other laws, ordinances, rulings or regulations applicable to the Property. The Water District hereby accepts the Property in its present condition, subject to all faults of every kind and nature whatsoever whether latent or patent and whether now or hereafter existing, including any presence of Hazardous Materials, and takes the Property subject to restrictions, easements, zoning ordinances, building and use restrictions and all other laws, ordinances, rulings or regulations applicable to the Property. The Water District acknowledges that it has not relied upon any representations or warranties whatsoever made by the Sanitation District or any of the Sanitation District's agents which are not expressly set forth in this Lease. The Water District agrees that the Sanitation District shall not be obligated to do any restoration, repairs or other work in connection with the Property and that the Sanitation District shall not be responsible for any work or improvements necessary to cause the Property to meet any applicable laws, ordinances, regulations or be suitable for any particular use. 10. Surrender. The Water District shall, on the last day of the tens of this Lease or any earlier termination of the tens of this Lease, surrender and deliver up the Property into the possession of the Sanitation District, its successors or assigns, in as good order, condition and repair as when delivered to the Water District. 11. Compliance with Laws. The Water District shall, at all times during the tens of this Lease and at its own cost and expense (subject to the this Section and Section 25 of the GW RS Agreement), perform and comply with all present or future laws, rules, orders, ordinances and regulations of the United States of America, of state, C:\Dec wm aM Sedingsyope\Lo I Settings\Temwmry MM1emel Fgea\OLK3FEMtem 15(d).2.dw Pegs 4 0 county or city governments, of any authority, department or bureau thereof and of any other municipal, governmental or lawful authority having jurisdiction over the Property whatsoever, relating to, or in any manner affecting the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties acknowledge that, under Section 25 of the GW RS Agreement: (a) the Sanitation District shall assist the Water District in obtaining any permits or approvals that the Water District may seek from governmental agencies in connection with the construction of the "AWT Facilities" (as such term is defined in the GWRS Agreement), the influent piping, the landscaping and the associated piping on the Property; and (b) upon the Water District's request, the Sanitation District shall file or cause to be filed any application, documentation, or information necessary to obtain such permits or governmental approvals. 12. Assignment and Subletting. Neither parry shall assign, transfer, hypothecate or mortgage this Lease or any interest herein nor sublet the Property or any part thereof without the prior written consent of the other Party; and any assignment (whether it is voluntary, involuntary or by operation of law), transfer, hypothecation, mortgaging or subletting without such prior written consent shall be void, shall entitle the non-consenting Party to terminate the term of this Lease and shall constitute a default hereunder. 13. Effect Of Waiver: Remedies Cumulative. The failure of either Party to insist, in any one or more instances, upon the strict performance of any of the terms, covenants, conditions and agreements of this Lease or to exercise any option herein conferred, shall not be considered as waiving or relinquishing for the future any such terms, covenants, conditions, agreements or options, and they shall continue and shall remain in full force and effect. 14. Holding Over. In the event that the Water District shall remain on the Property after the expiration or sooner termination of the term of this Lease without having executed a new written lease with the Sanitation District, such holding over shall not constitute a renewal or extension of this Lease. The Sanitation District may, at its option, elect to treat the Water District as one who has not removed at the end of his term and thereupon, be entitled to all the remedies against the Water District as provided by law in that situation. 15. Notices. All notices to the Sanitation District required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered (i) when delivered in person, (ii) on the third day after mailing, if mailed, postage prepaid, by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested); (ill) on the day after mailing if sent by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service which maintains records of the time, place, and recipient of delivery; (iv) upon receipt of a confirmed transmission, if sent by telex, telecopy or facsimile transmission; or(v) via electronic mail provided the sender's system is capable of creating a written record of such notice and its receipt in each case to the parties at the following addresses or to other such addresses as may be furnished in writing by one party to the other: C:\Documents and Settings\popeUcel Settlngs\Temporary Internet Files\OLK3FE\I1em 15(d).2.doc Page 5 0 Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Telecopier. 714-962-0356 E-Mail: banderson@ocsd.com Attention: General Manager With a copy to: District General Counsel, who is presently: Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq. Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart 701 South Parker Street, Suite 8000 Orange, CA 92868 Telecopier: 714-835-7787 E-Mail: tlw@wss-law.com All notices to the Water District required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered (i) when delivered in person, (it) on the third day after mailing, if mailed, postage prepaid, by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested); (iii) on the day after mailing 0 sent by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service which maintains records of the time, place, and recipient of delivery; (iv) upon receipt of a confirmed transmission, if sent by telex, telecopy or facsimile transmission; or (v) via electronic mail provided the sender's system is capable of creating a written record of such notice and its receipt in each case to the parties at the following addresses or to other such addresses as may be furnished in writing by one party to the other: Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Telecopier. 714-378-3371 E-Mail: vgrebbien@ocwd.com Attention: General Manager With a copy to: District General Counsel, who is presently: Kuperberg, Joel D. , Esq. Rutan & Tucker, LLP 611 Anton Boulevard Fourteenth Floor C1Documents and SeNngs\popeUDcal Settings\Temporary Imemet Res1OMFEVtem 15(d)2doe Page f 0 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1931 Telephone: (714) 641-5100 Telecopier: (714) 546-9035 E-Mail: jkuperberg @ rutan.00m 16. Successors And Assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, representatives, successors and permitted assigns. 17. Further Acts and Assurances. The Parties agree to execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all additional papers, documents and other assurances, and shall perform any and all acts and things reasonably necessary, in connection with the performance of the obligations hereunder and to carry out the intent of the Parties. 18. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are inserted only as a matter of convenience and reference and in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement nor in any way affects this Agreement. Words of any gender in this Agreement shall be held to include any other gender and words in the singular number shall be held to include the plural when the sense so requires. 19. Severability. Should it be found that any part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable, such part or parts of this Agreement shall be of no force nor effect and this Agreement shall be treated as if such part or parts had not been inserted. 20. Entire Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that they enter into this Lease for the purpose of implementing Section 25 of the GWRS Agreement. Subject to the GW RS Agreement, which remains in effect between the Parties, all previous negotiations had between the Parties hereto and/or their agents or representatives with respect to this Agreement are merged herein and this Agreement alone fully and completely expresses the Parties' rights and obligations. 21. Modifications In Writing. This Agreement shall not be modified in any manner except by an instrument in writing executed by the Parties or their respective successors in interest. 22. Interpretation. Each of the Parties hereby waives any provisions of law to the effect that an ambiguity in a contract or agreement should be interpreted against the Party that drafted the contract, agreement or instrument. 23. Governing Law. This Contract shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of California. 24. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create any third-party beneficiaries to the Agreement, and no person or entity other than the Parties, and the permitted successors and assigns of either of them, shall be authorized to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. CADocumentc and Seainge\pope\Lmal Mnge\Temporary Internet Fllea\OLK3Mhem 15(d).2.doc Page 7 p 25. Representation and Warranties. No representations or warranties are made or have been relied upon by either Party other than those expressly set forth herein, if any. CADocumenta and SMIngslpopetLocal Setfingffampmary Internet R eMOLOFEUtam 15(E).2.Aoc Page t 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT By: Chair, Board of Directors Date: By: Secretary, Board of Directors Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bradley R. Hogin, Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart Assistant General Counsel Orange County Sanitation District ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT By: President, Board of Directors Date: By: General Manager Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joel Kuperberg, Rutan & Tucker General Counsel Orange County Water District CADacuments and Seaings\pope\Local SeMngs\Temporary Internet Flles\OLK3FEgtem 15(d(.2.doc Page 9 0 F Exhibit "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT El ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT '!FIAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2 IN THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE. OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I RECORDED FEBRUARY 23, 1967 IN BOOK 8183,PAGE 28.OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,IN THE OFFICE OF TIM COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY AND THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL JUDGMENT IN CONDEMNATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I RECORDED FEBRUARY 7, 1961 IN BOOK 5622, PAGE 146, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COTINTY RECORDER, MORE PAR'I'ICLLARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS- SHGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE SOUTH Vr34'21" EAST 30.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4;THENCE SOUTH 0-06.14"WEST 432A4 FEET; THENCE WEST 670.51 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EABT LINE OF THE EASEMENT TO TIM CITY OE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, 15.00 FEET IN WIDTH.RECORDED IN JULY 30, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 11 .313034, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER SAID CAST LINE BEING PARALLEL WITH AND 40.00 FEET EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF WARD STREET; THENCE. NORTH 0-06.27" EAST 637.04 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAE) EASEMENT TO A POINT,SAM POINT BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE SOUTH 89°34.2I"EAST 620.49 FEET ALDNO THE NORTH LINE. OF SAID PARCEL 2 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TIIE AREA OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL IS 6.69 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT'B'ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. 1J.ND 6. L EfF.IL31tl y I ' Xc.Ta12 9-1t-o2 C\D000menta and Semngs\pope\Locel Set6ngs\Tempomry Internet HIesWLK3FE\ltem 151d1.2.doc Page 1 I I abed WP'Z'(P)s l we4\3ACAJO\eely Ia GWJ AmodE L\SOuWeS IeaoTedod\SBU.WS PUB quewrmM:O I M 113315 3M ,ALAWM W-94-6 m\•,I 3M1S <p 4 250[ aM ¢o m•ICYI ff3 � 7y�S ON`P OAS "Wit-" lf0 Nfd A7TNA I 1 NMw10f f0 OA 111 5t fo Anxm LSYJ I r r- kr SIC y: ram-• . \, .• , . �..nr'il:A ,' u � \ ' y � �\ •\ (y~ ,�` sue'` , a•'� � ••� I g 1 •�. - - \\•:.\•�. `-•`� ';\•..,ate\.`;.�ti.1\'�`t.\'' I{- aro6 Ave IlKKe6N IA,IZ,tCd6N S Ulm N3LYM A;NM 3GNYNG i6ii. 'N'G BZ/C6lB d lO 7 d 'tl3M1W 3N 3N i 3fdYc $6 9FNNPJJS 0 11ROd LQLM NWLVLdn 41mm now rmu�t 1fJJt uesoAr m bLD15 Z3 1181HX3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To ad.ai Dr. 4/23/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Numtler Item Numoer 15fe1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, INITIAL MICROFILTRATION/SITE POWER DISTRIBUTION ELEMENTS I & II PROJECT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to Kiewit Pacific Company, for construction of Initial Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution Elements I & 11 Project, Contract No. GW RS-2003-1, for an amount not to exceed $17,139,646, with OCWD and OCSD paying equal shares of $8,569,823. SUMMARY • In February, the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) approved the plans and specifications for the Initial Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution Elements I & II Project with an engineer's estimate of$17,100,000. • On March 25, 2003, five bids were received. • The lowest bid was in the amount of$17,139,646, • The low bid is $39,646 higher than the Engineer's Estimate of $17,100,000. • The GW RS budget does not need to be increased for this contract. • The JCC recommends awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Kiewit Pacific Company, for the bid amount of$17,139,646. • The recommended action was approved by the JCC on April 14, 2003. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The value of the contract awarded with this action is $17,139,646 to be equally shared with OCWD in the amount of$8,569,823. Sufficient funds are available in the current construction budget. The breakdown of total construction costs between the separate contracts is shown in the following table. The current total construction cost estimate is within the total estimate presented in October 2003 when the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the GWRS and the Green Acres Project and budget was approved. C\manners and SeleNcryopeLL«N SeMNo\Temporary Internet FII05QLK3FEV1nn 151e1.KleMt PadX.bx F.rit.a: &,Me Page 1 e Summary of Current Construction Budgetary Costs by Contract ID No. Contract Eng. Est Awarded Completed 1 Theo Lacy Pipeline Reach, GWR Portion $ 1,430, $ 1,430,000 2 GWR Pipeline-Reach 1 29,400,00( 3 GWR Pipeline-Reach 2 20,13M,001 4 GWR Pipeline- Reach 3 19,450,00( 5 Temp MF/Site work/Site Power 17,140, 17,139,646 6 ISoutheast Barrier Pipeline 3,381,00 3,381,0001 7 dvanced Water Treatment Facilities 256,000,00 8 G E Work for Permanent Substation 2,396, 2,396,00 rtier Well Drilling/Monitoting Wells/Wellhead 9 12,400,00(10 R Team Tem Offices/Trailers 807, 807, 11 orksho s 4,000,000 12uthem California Water Com an Well 1,635,0013 ndor design submittals for MF and UV 850, 850,000 14 Megrated Information system 3,100,00 15 er Controlled Insurance Program 6,000, 6,000,000 nstruction Total $378,789,00 $ 29,766,646 $ 2.237,00 Current Construction Cost to Complete Estimate $378,789,000 Current Construction Budget $ 380,446,000 Amount Estimate under Budget $ 1,657,000 The cost breakdown for the total Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) budget to be cost shared is: Construction: $380,446,000 Engineering, Legal, Administrative: $ 54,700,000 Construction Contingency: $ 18,854,000 $454,000,000 The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) Capital Budget is: GWRS Cost Shared Costs: $ 227,000,000 OCSD Non-cost Shared Costs: $ 9,400.000 Total Capital Costs to OCSD $ 236,400,000 Grants $ (45,000,000) Net Costs after Grants $ 191,400,000 C�0.u' rMn6 tip$eN��Temy,ary Imemel FIWS V FnW 150Wee PMifiC.N[ %� vlmse Page 2 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2002-03 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 157) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the attached April 14, 2003 Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES There no recommended alternatives to awarding to the lowest responsible bidder. CEGA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact ReporVEnvironmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the Groundwater Replenishment System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. April 14, 2003 JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Award of Contract No. GWRS-2003-1, Initial Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution Elements I & II Project WTS:sa MVitglobaPAgenda Draft RepodeVoint BoardW.36 IMF award 04-0340p CV ummnn W eeN,gJypeLL aeWr Nlempraq IMemN MW%0LK &Mm lae),Mn Pa c.tl aw ep:w,am Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36 j,,,, OMOINAL C=Um RM ..'ESTIMATED, ESTIMATED El ROPOSED 115 3 �0 MAT DATE Protect Development $ 700,000 $ 4,001) S 4,WO 41 4,001 1 4,000 $ 4,01 10011 Shalles/Pennifting' 3,313,00 It 3.313,000 $ 3,300.000 $ 3.3ffl.000 $ 3.313.000 100% Consultant PSA' $ 7,500,000 $ 18.631.849 $ 18.631,849 $ 16.830.784 $ 16830784 If 4.737.000 28% M7 Design Staff 2.349,000 $ 5.357.000 S 5.357,000 $ 5.357.000 $ 5.357.000 $ 1,122,000 21% Construction Contract'* It 86,4811.500 $ 190.223.000 $190.223.000 $ 21,965,5118 $ 3.381,00 $ 25.285i588 $ 2,600.000 10% Construction Avinunistril $ 2.653.900 $ 6,653.000 $ 6.663.000 If 5,496.519 1 5.496,619 S 209,000 4% Construction inspection $ 9.345.600 1I 326.000 $ 326.000 $ 82,000 0% Contingency $ 12,895.01)(1 a 1111,864,1151 $ 11.8".151 0% IPROJECTTOTAL 1 $ 121,926,001111$ 236,372,000 $236,372,000 $ 52,893,891 $ 3.381,000 $ 56.274.891 $ 12.067.000 21% Reimbursable Costs1$ 45.000.000 1 It 45.0=000 1,A I 1 1$ 1,653,0001 "Il 1PROJECT NET 1 It 121,925.000 1 It 191,372.000 1 $191,372,000 1 'l $ 52,893,891 1 S 3.381=11] $ 56.274,891 1$ 10.414.000 19% *Funds aullhofted to data Includes multiple contracts Issued under the towns of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District -Funds authorized to data Include Pipeline at Theo Lacy Jail.SCE substation construction,ternporrary,office facilities,production of MF/UV vendor design documents,and Omer Controlled Insurance Progran,and now adds the Southeast garrier Pipeline ...Funds authorized to date Include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27,2002 CADocuments and SelfintIMpopeLocal SeffingskTamporary,firdemet Fffzat0LK3FE1 Item 1 5(c),I.xlslo&m BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36Did CUS y, PROJ a RABK 2AUT{I$ a ,ys rap BUD¢ET PROF Q34 ,1 i "I FvT(j t•'^ FJIP�NOIN E EXP N zE1n�m 9 7 js ,g ' 1 � bRIZED qG H F L,' tr, "t+ � REV19 O 1 F d ., 1 de h E160t7ET +.�BUho h `$INCREASE :s A'IIEs ..Y?tN ii: �17H 1 ,`TtON TO fj7 YO OATE S:i Protect Y Development 700000 4000 $ 4000 $ 4000 H .r'F S 4000 8 4000 100% Fh 1h l'+- StudleslPermltlin ' 3313000 $ 3313000 S 3300000 9 '.: $ 3300000 $ 3313000 100% • ' qW.' Consultant PSA' 7500ADD If 18631849 It 18631849 18830784 $ 18830784 $ 4,737.000 28% Desl n Staff $ 2,349,00D E 5,357,000 $ 5 357 000 It6357 000 563576000 $ 1,122.00 21% Conabruction Contract is 88481600 190,223,000 $ 190223000. . 13336765 [.1!b-'ey,V A1g: . 21905588 S 2600000 12% Construction [Administration... $ 2853900 8653000 $ 8653000 6498619 $ 5496.519 $ 209,000 4% Construction In coon 5 9346600 8000 $ 326000 $ 62000 0% Contingency E 12,895,000 E 11,884,161 $ 11.884,161 0% PROJEOTTOTAL $ 121.925,000 $ 23 ,3] ,000 36372000 $ V-'<4 E 52.893,091 $ 12,067.000 23% Reimbursable Coals $ 45,000,000 E 43000,000 $ 1,653.0001 PROJECT NET $ 121,925,000 $ 191,372,000 $ 191,372,000 $ 44.324,066 E �I e, ! E 52,893,891 $ 10,414,000 20% NOTES: Funds authorized to date includes multiple contracts issued under Me terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District Funds authorized to date Include Pipeline at Theo Lary Jail,SCE substation construction,temporary office facilities,production of MF7UV vendor design documents. Owner Controlled Insurance Program,Southeast Barrier Pipeline,vendor documents for the process control system,and now adds construction of the Initial Microfiltretion and Ste Ufililies "'•Funds authorized to data include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27,2002. EMS 003747352. BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 . ,,( ORIOItUL C m t 1�0,08 O PRO 08ED ,• .' .O�NOa A ^]��t IS ..PK ixJ TRAS '6rli6" "" 1 P� Ec�,r uu... I o,$, u r`�Hx, ,iob3 o ,S.tiUo7�EF,w �;�a .'uoo '� ; rrt, ' r? ''"i1�8 -.. . 4��`�'I ;� o �T'iP:-`:: 'ttlar Development It 700,000 $ 4.000 $ 1000 '3' $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 100% SIWIas/Permmi 3,313,000 $ 3,313,000 !'i� $ 3,300,000 S 3.300.000 $ 3.313,000 100% Consultant PW $ 7.500.000 $ 1883L849 $ 18'63"849 �,'� $ 16.830,784 It 16.830.784 $ 4737.000 28% e: Design Staff $ 2,349.000 It 5357000 S 6.357,000 ,'3' $ 5,357000 $ 5357.000 It 1.122.000 21% Construction Contract' $ 86,481.600 It 190,223.000 5190.223.000 ;(�� S 21.906.588 It 3,381000 S 25.286588 $ 2600000 10% Construction Administration— It 2,653,900 $ 6.653000 $ 6,653,000 $ 5,496519 $ 5.496,519 $ 209.000 4% Construction Inspection $ 8,345600 $ 328000 $ 326.000 S 82.000 0% 1 Contingency $ 12.895.000 $ 11,884,151 S 11,11 0% /I PROJEC`fTOTAL $ 121,925.000 It 236,372.000 It236.372,000 S 52,893.891 $ 3.381.000 $ 50.274,891 $ 12,067p00 21% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ 46,000,000 1 1 $ 45.000,000 $ 1,653,000 PROJECT NET 1 $ 121,925.000 1$ 191.372.000 1 1 $191.372.000 It 62.893,891 1$ 3,381i000), S 56.274.891 $ 10.414,000 1 19% Funds aulhorlud to date Includes multiple contracts Issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District "Funds authorised to data include Pipeline at Theo Lary Jell,SCE substation construction•temporary office facilities,production of MFNV vendor design documents,and Owner Controlled Insurance Program and now adds the Southeast Banter Pipeline "'Funds authorved to date include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27,2002 CnDocumenls and SellingslpopelLocel Settings\Temporary Internet FlleslOLK3FSjItem I S(e).1.alslo8m BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT?ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Prated Development $ 700.000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 S 4,000 $ 4,000 S 4,000 100% ShilleslPermi6l ' 3.313.000 $ 3,313.000 $ 3.300,000 $ 33000D0 $ 3,313,000 100% Consu6ant PSA' $ 7,500,000 $ 18,631,849 $ 18,631.849 $ 16,830,784 $ 16830784 $ 4,737.000 28% Design Staff $ 2,349000 3 5.357.000 It 5.357.000 $ 5,357,000 $ 5,357.000 $ 1,122,000 21% Constructlan Contract" $ 86.481 600 $ 190,223.000 $190.223.000 $ 25,286,588 312110 $ 25,598.698 $ 2.600,000 10% Construction Administration... $ 2653.900 $ 6,653,000 $ 6,653.000 $ 5.496,519 $ 5.490,519 $ 2D9,D00 4% Construction Inspection $ 9,345.600 $ 328000 $ 326,000 $ 82,D00 0% Contingency $ 12,885,000 $ 11 B8/.151 $ 11.864.151 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 121,925,000 $ 238,372,000 $236,372,000 $ 56,274,891 IS 312,110 $ 56,587,001 $ 12.067,000 21% Reimbursable Costs $ 45,0D0.000 1 1 $ 45,000,000 1 1 $ 1,653,000 PROJECT NET I S 121,925,000 1$ 191,372,000 1 1 S191,372.000 $ 56.274,891 1$ 312.110 $ 56,587.001 $ 10.414.000 1 18% •Funds authored to dale Includes multiple contracts Issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District "Funds authorized to date Include Pipeline at Theo Lary Jail,SCE substation construction,temporary oMce facllilles,production of MFIUV vendor design documents,Owner Controlled Insurance Program,Southeast Barder Pipeline,and now adds vendor documents for the process contml system. "'Funds authorized to dale Include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27,2002 C1DOeument9 and Setlingslpope\Local SetlingslTemporary Internet Flles\OLK3FEgltem 15(e).1.xls)o&m BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlng Date Toaa.or .Dlr. 4/23/a3 AGENDA REPORT 1emMumber Item Number 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Larry Rein, Project Manager SUBJECT: BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, JOB NO. 1-2-4 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Huntington Beach providing for a temporary fire station facility and related staffing costs in connection with Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job Number 1-2-4, in an amount not to exceed $264,500, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • The Bushard Trunk Sewer project is located within the Cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. The trunk sewer is in Bushard Avenue between Ellis Avenue and Banning Road, Banning Road between Bushard Avenue and Brookhurst, and Brookhurst between Banning Road and Plant No. 2. The project consists of four miles of 108-inch sewer pipe. • The City of Huntington Beach (City) has determined that the construction of the Bushard Trunk Sewer will impact its Fire Department's emergency response ability, as defined by the City's General plan, while construction is on Bushard Street between Adams Avenue and Garfield Avenue. • The City has determined that a temporary fire station facility located on the east side of Bushard Street will eliminate any impact the construction of the Bushard Trunk Sewer may have on City Fire Department's emergency response ability. • By this agreement, Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) agrees to provide and directly pay for set and maintenance expenses for the temporary fire station in an amount not to exceed $26,000. OCSD also agrees to reimburse the City for staffing the station in an amount not exceed $238,000. • City has previously approved this agreement. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$264,500 is being requested to fund this agreement. Funds will need to be reallocated from Contingency Funds to Construction Administration. No increase in total project funds is required. See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY02-03, Section 8, Page 56, Capital Improvement Budget) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION City of Huntington Beach (City) is requiring that the temporary Fire Station be provided as a condition of obtaining the encroachment permit to construct the Bushard Trunk Sewer, between Adams Avenue and Garfield Avenue. City has agreed to limit the operation of the temporary fire station facilities to only the period required to eliminate the impact of the construction work on the Fire Department's response time. ALTERNATIVES Staff, the Design Consultant, and the City have considered the possibility of alternative construction sequencing and traffic control and have not found any reasonable alternative. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. The project was included in Addendum No. 3 to EIR approved on December 19, 2001. The addendum did not change CEQA findings. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table LR:sa G:MtglobaMgenda Dmfl RepmtsVolM BoaMSWR City of He Relmbur ment IQ4.dm Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION �y CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4 F �,}� u e � 1 1+'� {*7RU " r, "xr Pon e, O 5 Tr73,570 sIra4 ' .dt S , . h ^ , 2s,,.e "m.:vs".:2 .et.3iu, . .>r.�wf..z�fimv, ho-,6� 5• 4- � � @'z Project Develo ment $ 7,800 $ 74,000 $ - $ 74,000 ��^. $ 74,000 $ 74,000 $Studies/Permittin $ 15,002 $ 8,000 $. - $ 8,000 sti� $ 8,000 $. - $ 8,000 $ Consultant PSA $ 260,900 $ 2,108,352 $ - $ 2,108,352 s $ 2.108,352 $ - $ 2,108,352 $ 1,700,000 81% Design Staff $ 790,824 $ 582,000 $ 582,000 $ 582,000 $ 582,000 $ 412,000 71% Construction Contract $ 21,217,321 $ 30,153,210 $ - $ 30,153,210 $ 30,153,210 $ - $ 30,153,210 $ 3,650,000 12% Construction Administration $ 1,049,624 $ 1,270,000 $ 264500 $ 1,534,500 "'i $ 1,270,000 $ 264,500 $ 1,534,500 $ 179,000 12% Construction Inspection $ 1,913,106 $ 2,192,000 $ 2,192,000 $ 2,192,000 1 $ 2,192,000 $ 146,000 71/6 Contingency $ 7,548,924 $ 2,596,438 $ 264,500 $ 2,331,938 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 32,803,501 $ 36,984,000 $ - $ 36,984,000 $ 38,387,562 $ 264,500 $ 36,652,062 $ 6,167,662 117% �i Reimbursable Costs #„� PROJECT NET 1 $ 32,803,501 1 $ 38,984,000 1$ - $ 38,984,000 A $ 36.387,562 1 $ 264,500 $ 36,652,062 1$ 6,167,662 17% 3/5/2003 EDMS ID 003746274 File Folder 2003-03 '►1 -; BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meedng Date To s 03 oil. 'I AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Rem Number v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager SUBJECT: FULL SECONDARY TREATMENT SCHEDULE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to submit the Full Secondary Treatment Schedule for the Ocean Discharge Permit Application to the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, consistent with Resolution No. OCSD 02-14, Establishing the Policy for Level of Treatment of Wastewater Discharged into the Ocean. SUMMARY The full secondary treatment schedule was the subject of the April 16, 2003, Special Board Meeting. This schedule is based upon Resolution 02-04, from July 17, 2002, which established full secondary treatment as the District treatment standard. This schedule would complete the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) implementation of full secondary treatment in December 2012. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No authorization of expenditures is being requested at this time. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 93,,lob No. SP-es) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No new authorization of expenditures is being requested at this time. The FY2003-04 CIP Budget will be adopted in accordance with existing District policies and procedures, but will be based on the results of this effort. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The proposed schedule is attached to this Agenda Report. As shown, the District will achieve full secondary treatment in December 2012, when the Plant No.1 secondary expansion is completed. C:\Documents and Setlings\pope\Local SetUngs\Temporary Internet Files\OLOFE\Item 17.Full Secondary Treatment Schedule,docPage 1 r This planning full secondary treatment effort has taken approximately eight months and involved the following major efforts: 1.) The review and validation of the proposed full secondary treatment program's cost and schedule. 2.) The review, validation, and integration of the District's Capital Improvements Program (CIP) with the proposed secondary treatment program. 3.) The convening of an independent Peer Review Panel to review the proposed full secondary treatment program. The next step to full secondary treatment is the submitting of the schedule to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region IX, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region. After this full secondary treatment schedule is submitted, EPA and the RWQCB will complete the permit negotiation process and issue a new Ocean Discharge Permit. Currently, neither EPA nor the RWQCB have committed to a completion date of this permit process. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS A supplemental Environmental Impact Report will be prepared for the projects within the full secondary treatment program. ATTACHMENT Full Secondary Treatment Schedule BPA:JB;jo GA .MategendaMoaNAgenda Remns� MBoard Agenda Repods*403\ltem 17.Full Secondary Tma"ent Schedule.doc ...,..m aaom Page 2 v 6 FULL SECONDARY TREATMENT SCHEDULE ''Y"1W'iS�"M.:Y.wlrYtn'Yr.in miPaY:uTfYI."m Y.... . .......... tAft ....Owl, r ... .. ... ••Y YY�t.•rmwwsmaYYM ma vw mM xwmew `Y•. xmatrnp�u.r.•tNw IIW raM aw®.m - .1... 1•t.w.aYMMtM 1M1' raw mYw•' aW11M "w" tpmx.x...r.mwe.rrw. IMYI raa mf N uaun�m '"11" YY.rt.oeeax met mw m.m. mni+ttie 'Y rv�uw�...o•w� txam wrcNr.m — "r rrnwr t�wa mam Nm � .-Y"' YY.tWa~mxsmrrnexrwrtNumx mmN' ttmttimoe Yp" •mmu.�•n�.�i.•wum ammvrt mM NatRv.m — �IY 1Wrt.wYbYax Ipll. I,aNt tiNar•' N,NMNN 1Y M1vnuwmM.Y'orsabLo Ibbri'. r,aYlt hIN•': a.1biN0Y YY 4 IYwt.0.0tYtlrr INM: NM fIWt f vmnr IY PgvruwmxFft. 'YFhb%YbtvTMWry PYbn 1n101 H1Y1tQ12 ]HOYyt i1L,ttl}01.111 Y Nuv t.muneEwawun mem. trweoiw "Y" renters.. ,max' mw "Y' nN.an..n•-+.o..a.,nilrs..�..+eal m.x. nwam.m 1"' wwf.woaewromwl mar• NM nriwr wr taxat . wuwui•i4n rut nwwl' ad.,:' 'Y' rwn•r.,•w��.n+v.rw+m mam am+mrw 'Y' Nwf.wtmr •x N• xirgeNn tar vwr •,1.... gpwyvny,rn.Mp rIIM vrm atery• Nira,m.m "Y"" ..w.e arm luam tom 'm" r..ta.wxmuerxrwlaumx mam tNwlwm IY" rx•Y.waaemx ar wx. umnaat "rr' traa.ni..�r.rm.n... miu i aiam mxnam YrYln. a .x.. Want If nrw�.maaur maw• mrtxx 1 npuvwn�i.cr•ea wr mn a,r.xr.w _arvn amx Y...PYS.YYaetlrilM aluCp yYbmNM) Irtroi >nat] HY Cryt 10.00 "T"' wart mam xM�r-mennona wm nw Y.. Wm Ww. urM vlam rN4n wm .� 'l xy.�u.�xn.ni.rnr•..ruw.nen••wnw, mw mr mae,. ww ..1'.......Me•f.YP9YYx%AYwtM rryu. tNW' rnepr NM ..•{'• faiWnitiFn IRn Itl1601 Name mw ."Y'-. xY�xnw+ nnN+nrvrm� tmam bw f Ar•i.nYNM aaep• ."W r vwn�i.ert. Nram NN Z T' umx Nm Ytl' wawa NM If.. Nnynwi.�n rrax miar rnarr rimf avn' mm — 'YY" YYr4mmYmx tmb/tvma mutt tett .lT ..... xa+bnw...n r�v'Wwi m'pm' Ilmw irtid mY _ 11 wMY mM• ar 1 rIFUWwnn mmwt .......mvN ml wr• mw a.1.a..,n.Y.w..awr...mx.,. � aw.. ann.r %nWl•N or•m•t .d lY nnradw tM mnM 0 a4�nfumar ^ Y.nnW lrMn� M•1 FULL SECONDARY TREATMENT SCHEDULE +_ laewean�d"ane�—fi ew Wiiw..—Tn.m:.x ___�mmx _.Nwe " lew iugniae _ .-T.• M�l.nmcrmmamr -... - atb' mN mm,e k4Plr ' "t mean wY.nr rn.. .nmomvwrvm. mm ww T o.sraf.Ya� mm loom aan mm ','. � '. 'Y ma,. a.APYa awe.ril WMe NMe '-r' Mre:mwr.Yrn wYm amm m,an Pmnem 1 rNMN ama Yvm rew mm ."i' Y6.:�.wriemunkeiemkuiv iTew WNI wan PAme.OY — "u' wwe.m®er now xeneva Nen wNr q Yp,emrwu-�rYre Nem Ynm vM ummem '. � L. R.FYawenw.-aeue em.m.m — 'r ewnnawmawmwawrewPron mm wm Imxmxe m.eavrx.ae � w�.wYPmm.mmmr Yem Nme eRa.m _Yyrera.ri-ce+ie:.+ atae YaTm rcea.w waeea n 'r ee.ne.arlrm.mePx Pran aaean xm.e.Y....Y.nar..err maw ewmim "r" mw• ewama ~•MaY�w..YY �nM PY.lelm "e e.mrwln:aX�aPa1.wN .Ran '.ar Rnws NN, eniYma .YY -1MlWwri.wauan Iliam YIeN .R6n P)k).Al.m '.. .'IT NM uern kaew I. _rr n.rYn.,e..Ye.� Iman em,wm '. T na�semnrrxevmwwim.mn xraw mm Ixmane ue,uumso re..e.rnewvrsmomrr wow nmwm Y.m W.n 'x R.IWraerY c.+u+n - -.- mm 'Yaw raw. kabgk _..a-waakRexaeq. - mm maw maY. -.- moos '. T...w..... Nm mm a nY..mn,nwY.n.e.Y.eYW, IYmm Nnm mw. manor _ r' ii .e.vew - Iwv .nme eix� Pawxllm -aWla+rw.ww. _. . Rm-- Rnrm saw- ksalT.a 'Y" near am ' 'r er..mvmmenNememexYwY ema aeYw u.n,,,ma mwe i a n.r.mwe°e cmw�a. Nw Yoem elan uunwm � v' a..e.PmeYm meee. ew.se .......� -- ._.,.._-----— — --- °m�`aYem wr.xaa.wmwrpaw rr � r.Y.. Yw�.n em:.a,r ,... d. Y. ® .mWY,,..n �� r mra.♦ FULL SECONDARY TREATMENT SCHEDULE ..x..'YbiV.T11:':Y+•n•..Ie:�u N.•5.d.eYbnn<i N•unlw. ........... ldnf ..."'-iHrtm a. — QiN,Szla 1-1 .� wr-". eltw71,0a.f lnim la:lneJ..uf:. naJlfl:. 1.Ml:AziB[. �.}a .1.. wr.-mewaormAwwr I.b.:. vuwm r.Yl nwl -f" .fbaawY _ unwx Inw wb.. w.mYs . f... 's ..s..mwwcwx�wlYu wY Ywlx web. w�nm f ,Yr Yum r.b. wwm I tl ti weo.:. I .N. x,x.n. 1 n-n zwnmonixr wnwnx.m..ne eYnnw woo zram n.o en. fw,ew,felae � 1 M�-MORateeV6erYw1 ab. e •......ateR.,:.oa.wmw mm xY�m ssYY.. „x..rwo t wbl-.•YemM...rowY rw.. �wwr w....:: waam ..y.. w.A.:•.... .,. .w wr,.m,.. IY,wI Y,.m 'T w.eA.w ivmm vow :�•.n am '. -1- wb•. u.Axmlm - �Y T n.w Ya..x.a.ce.wete 1N eeb+:. fax•sti,w e-eox zw "ff ,w•.mtlnYw . . Yw eM. vremiro n.W 1m m awam Lvonm�A'. wM fOM fR.wm nr aYwm aa.r 'Yf M+W M.uyn�:.4w.n Tm rMr dd n IC.wW Y f...W]Az-01-0f .w 9uep GmXe1NY. wm HOw1 NMwe9'. W�lzl.m&00 -.. . . wr1. w W w.l .1. a....Y.w-�..owr:� YAm I w mLM.. f 1...a....nmmuv.u.wl � „saw. 1'an.we.•u+. w ml•m uM_ m hY.Y.wew.MWs..rlWn Yf Yp MMw 1 l-[YqY Iw1Y 1..i. m�Al.1 `Y.F.YteteY+.•dN: _. uhlq ManMi:..:' u.�taO r wwr.. •YY wYr In. w r wr..wnmawrw.ww+N '.:I�YVq wb� p wY.YWs.'fsww . — il I.w..mewl wb. fw.rw xmn •�, ...P�YY.Iter.r+ IazwY+. .d1'e 1AYWM a. rta t. If�.l tLYYM IMYI Iwadadda. .W IY .:wlYrlry w... ItlYll wM wIM .yrMwrVOYYnwMYNYrW..Ptw: MWw Y.rr Wieb Y.w. �'. Y MMY.aaa, WWwa M1..i a Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III Peer Review Panel Summary Report Prepared by University of Southern California Sea Grant Program and University of California, Santa Barbara Marine Science Institute March 21,2003 r Executive Summary of Review Panel Comments on the Huntington Beach Phase III Final Draft Report March 21, 2003 Background High bacteria counts at Huntington State Beach forced a two-month beach closure in the summer of 1999,at significant cost to the community. This occurred immediately upon implementation of the AB41 I beach closure standards.The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)conducted a series of studies to determine the source of the bacteria. Initial studies suggested that contamination from the sewage outfall 7 km off the east end of the beach was unlikely,but not impossible. Sewage leakage from beach restrooms,and animal waste from nearby Talbert Marsh have been implicated in tracer studies,but the source of the contamination had not been clearly identified as of spring,2001. Scientific Objectives Phase III of the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation re-focused attention on the sewage outfall,with specific hypotheses conceming onshore transport of the sewage plume.The study objectives,as originally stated in the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation,Phase III Workplan are: "1)characterize the physical oceanographic processes involved in possible cross-shelf transport of the wastewater plume in the vicinity of the AES thermal discharge outfall;2)determine if there is a causal link between offshore and surf zone bacteria and related plume constituents;and 3)determine if the conditions during the summer of 2001 are similar to those of 1999 and other years with unusual surf zone bacteria levels". The Principal Investigators(Pis)in the study,after careful consideration,refined the objectives in October,2002 thus: "The principal objective for this multifaceted measurement program was to determine if there is a causal link between offshore wastewater discharge and significant bacterial contamination at or above state beach sanitation standards(i.e.,AB411)along the Huntington Beach shoreline.This objective includes the aim of identifying coastal ocean processes that could explain any observed links.A secondary objective was to determine the principal coastal-ocean circulation patterns in this region,allowing the evaluation of any new ideas that may arise or gain recognition during or following this study.Thirdly,conditions during the summer of 2001 would be compared to those of 1999 and other years with a high incidence of surf zone bacteria contamination." By this statement,the Pis defined the important issue as bacterial contamination causing beach closures,not a more general question about bacterial transport. y Study Result As stated in the Phase III Draft Report: ... there were no direct observations of either the high bacteria concentrations seen in the OCSD plume at the shelf break reaching the shoreline in significant levels or of an association between the existence of a coastal ocean process and beach contamination at or above AB411 levels. It is concluded that the OCSD plume is not a major cause of beach contamination; no causal links could be demonstrated. This conclusion is based on the absence of direct observation of links between bacteria in the outfall plume and beach contamination,on analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of shoreline contamination and coastal processes, and on the observation of higher levels of contamination at the beach than in the plume." Review Process The University of Southern California Sea Grant Program convened an independent panel of experts to conduct a peer review of the Huntington Beach Phase III Study. The purpose of this review was to"evaluate the scientific process,data,and interpretation of scientific results,and provide ongoing feedback to help guide the investigators in their analysis of these studies." The Review Panel met with the Principal Investigators in person in April 2002 for preliminary presentations of the Phase III Study results and analyses. Subsequent to this first meeting,the Panel submitted a Preliminary Report to OCSD on their initial findings of the Phase III Study on May 15,2002. In August 2002, the Panel and PIs met again to further discuss the analyses of the Phase III data. Following the August meeting,the Panel submitted a second response to the PIs with recommendations for further improvement of the Phase III analyses. The Panel and PIs have also corresponded via phone and email throughout the review process. A written Final Draft report was made available by the PIs in January 2003 for review by the Panel. This Executive Summary is the result of a concerted peer review effort by the Review Panel over the last two months and represents a synopsis of their collective comments on the Phase III Final Draft Report. The Review Panel consisted of: John Allen,Ph.D. Oregon State University Theoretical geophysical fluid dynamics; Coastal ocean dynamics Jack Barth,Ph.D. Oregon State University Coasinl ocean d-nnmics: Flrnv-topn^rnnhp imrrnctions 2 r Walter B.Frick,Ph.D. USEPA Ecosystems Research Division. Plume models for outfall design and assessment;Low-velocity compressible flow theory Roger Fojioka,Ph.D. Water Resources Research Center.University of Hawaii Environmental water quality; Public health microbiology Trish Holden,Ph.D. University of California, Santa Barbara Microbiology;Bacterial community fingerprinting Jesus Pineda,Ph.D. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Cross-shore transport of planktonic larvae;Benthic population ecology Cynthia Cudaback,Ph.D. (Co-chair) University of California,Santa Barbara Inner shelf transport and effect on biological communities Jody Lemus,Ph.D.(Co-chair) Sea Grant Program, University of Southern California Marine Advisory Program Leader Review Panel Objectives OCSD initiated Phase III of the HB studies to determine whether sewage discharged offshore from Huntington Beach can be transported to the beach and under what conditions it may do so. Therefore,the Panel has focused on three main questions: 1. Do the studies adequately answer the specific investigatory objectives that were addressed? 2. Were the data properly interpreted and presented in the preliminary reports? 3. Are there other studies that could be conducted to determine the risk of plume insurgency onto the shoreline? General Comments The Panel acknowledges that the Phase III field studies conducted during the summer of 2001 were of high quality and represent a commendable undertaking. The size and completeness of the data that this study has generated set is also impressive. Given the amount of time available to the Principal lnvestioators.the analyses are progressing well. 3 S The Panel considers the Final Draft Report to be a good start at analyzing the full complement of data and expect that several new contributions to the field of ocean coastal circulation will be forthcoming from this work. The main conclusion of the Final Draft Report,"It is concluded that the OCSD plume is not a major cause of beach contamination;no causal links could be demonstrated,"is complex,with two separate statements. The second statement,"no causal links could be demonstrated,"is based on temporal and spatial disconnects between the outfall, transport processes,and beach contamination.Although events that might drive onshore transport of bacteria were observed(such as cold water entering the surf zone),these events did not coincide with or precede beach contamination events in exceedence of the AB411 standards. High bacterial concentrations were observed rear the outfall and at the beach,but measurements also indicated that there was a zone of lower concentration between the two regions.Given the current status of analyses on the Phase III studies and based on the available measurements,this conclusion seems to be reasonable and accurate. However,with respect to the first half of the conclusion,"the OCSD plume is not a major cause of beach contamination,"the Panel finds that this statement is not supportable because of the incomplete nature of the analyses and to limitations in the spatial and temporal resolution of the Phase III sampling. While a connection between the OCSD outfall and beach contamination has not been found,a lark of understanding of some key parameters warrants caution;categorical dismissal of the OCSD plume as a major cause of beach contamination is not scientifically justifiable at this point Several variables that remain in question are discussed below. 1)Bacterial semolina The Panel recognizes the difficulty of collecting and analyzing bacterial data,but notes that the spatial and temporal resolution of sampling in this study was heavily weighted towards hydrographic data. While these field experiments far exceeded previous studies in sampling intensity,and the number of bacterial samples processed by OCSD was extraordinary,the bacterial monitoring data remain a limitation. Accordingly,the transport and behavior of bacteria in the coastal ocean is not adequately understood. Another limitation of the surfzore bacterial analyses is that a Inge percentage of the data are not graphically represented because samples with less than 20 MPN total or fecal coliform or less that 10 MPN entemr:occi,are not included(HB-III Final Draft Report, Figs.2a,2b,2c). 2)Spatial disconnection The argument that the OCSD outfall plume is not a major source of beach contamination relies on the spatial gap between high bacterial concentrations in the core of the plume and the high bacterial concentrations Treasured at the beach. Given that the transport properties of bacteria in the coastal ocean are not well understood,it seems prudent to allow for the possibility of a range of plausible behaviors.A possible mechanism for bridging the observed spatial disconnect could be in the reconcenhation of bacteria either within the surfznne or di,inr tmm—rt. If the M^-'- i<rensidered In he the end of the transport pathway,and bacteria transported to snore remain on shore or trapped in the surfzone,possibly adsorbed to sediment particles,then low concentrations of bacteria just 4 offshore can be reconcentrated at the beach. The potential for resuspension of fecal indicator bacteria within the surfzoue was not addressed in the Phase III study and therefore cannot be ruled out as a possible source of beach contamination. Another explanation involves the gravitational collapse of the plume,which tends to limit its vertical extent As a vertically collapsed lens,the plume could penetrate coarse vertical sampling grids,and thereby lead to substantial bacteria maxima being missed. 3)Patchiness The spatial discontinuity between high concentrations of bacteria in the outfall plume and high concentrations of bacteria at the beach may be due to a patchy distribution of bacteria and other plume tracers.The Phase III data clearly demonstrate that the plume field can be patchy(Fig.5-12,Volume 11),and that patches of the plume can sometimes come close to shore (Figs.3-11 and 6-12,Volume 11). Although the region between the plume signature and the beach contains low bacterial concentrations,the distance between the two is sufficiently close to warrant careful consideration of sampling adequacy. Additionally,these high values at shallow depths are coincident in time with high bacterial concentrations near the beach. 4)Surface ti nsooR The wind-driven surface transport of buoyant particles should be examined as a possible pathway for the transport of plume bacteria ono shore. The possibility of this mechanism was acknowledged in the Final Draft Report,but not included in the design of the Phase III studies for several reasons involving the unlikely association of bacteria with grease and oil particles,both offshore and at the beach. Indeed,the Phase III data indicate that the plume is almost always submerged beneath the thermocline. Independent modeling by one member of the Panel (W. Frick)supports these results. However,low concentrations of bacteria have been measured at the surface by OCSD personnel,and features of the plume were occasionally observed at the surface during the Phase 11 investigations(Figs. 3-14 and 4-13 of HB-111 Final Draft Report). Finally,the accumulation of buoyant particles at onshore propagating fronts associated with an internal tide has been observed in Southern California(Pineda, 1999). 5)Cross-shelf transport mechanisms A thorough consideration of cross-shelf transport of physical water properties and plume material is not yet complete. For example,additional analyses should be directed at quantifying the nature of the across-shelf transport of the temperature field as a function of spatial location on the shelf and as a function of frequency. In addition,internal solitary waves,which are often associated with the internal tide and capable of transporting particles onshore,are Trot adequately addressed in the Final Draft Report. likewise,the association of at least one cold water intrusion into the nearshore indicates the plausibility, if not probability,of this mechanism and deserves further analysis. A third mechanism that could also be investigated is transport in the bonom boundary layer by breaking internal waves near a sloping boundary. 5 Future Studies There are two main areas of concem that could benefit from further research:cross-shelf transport and circulation mechanisms,and accurate tracking of plume bacteria. Cross-shelf transport and circulation mechanisms 1) The spatial and temporal variability of the internal tide must be investigated in order to better understand the role of internal tidal motions in across-shelf transport.Field observations are needed to conclusively discard internal solitary waves as a mechanism for onshore transport of plume effluent bacteria. 2) Further dye tracking experiments,with a release outside the surfzone, may be useful to determine whether water-bome particles can be transported from the 15m isobath to the surfzone. If possible,adding dye to the effluent after the 200:1 dilution near the outfall may also yield profitable results. This latter experiment would need to be timed with the occurrence of spring tides. 3) The nature of the across-shelf circulation could be further explored by examining in more detail the coupled behavior of the temperature and velocity field.This analysis should include calculations of the mean across-shelf and along-shelf_ fluxes of temperature (uT and vT)as a function of depth and spatial location on the shelf,including a breakdown into contributions from different frequency bands. 4) A comprehensive model of plume rise,ocean circulation,and very possibly bottom and sea-surface atmospheric interaction is necessary to help synthesize the complex processes and interactions involved in the transport and fate of the OCSD effluent. Such a model, including the AES Power Plant plume and other sources, will likely be the only way to reach definitive conclusions about what proportion of beach contamination is due to the OCSD effluent. Tracking of plume bacteria 1) One important issue that remains unanswered,and should be addressed in future studies, is the question of which chemical and physical oceanographic measurements are suitable tracers for fecal indicator bacteria and for pathogens directly. 2) Good high-resolution time series data of some plume indicator other than temperature and salinity would be beneficial. This will not be possible for bacteria, but could be done for tracers,such as nutrients,as one (J. Largier) has used in other areas. Commercially available moored nutrient sensors could be deployed along the potential pathway to provide high-temporal resolution nxaaw eiurr:_ , . •. r;�uidc�! si^raun'r •. ,.�. 6 r 3) Although the objective of the current study was to demonstrate whether the ocean outfall was responsible for high bacterial counts in the surfzone,the probability that measurable but low levels (1-50 MPN/100 ml)of fecal bacteria in ocean effluent do reach the surfzone remains an important question to answer for all ocean outfalls. 4) The possibility of beach contamination due to local sources on the beach should be further addressed. Land based sources of bacteria are not restricted to mstrooms, Talbert Marsh or the Santa Ana River. Bird feces,dog feces,seaweed,and soil on the beach,and marine mammals are other known sources of fecal indicator bacteria. While bird counts and marine mammal observations have been performed in previous Huntington Beach contamination studies,this contingency could be more thoroughly explored. 5) A good model of bacterial transport and die-off would be useful. However, bacterial die-off is a difficult issue and quantitative die-off models are rare.One such model is the Mancini model (1478)that expresses a decay coefficient as a function of light intensity,salinity,and temperature. A review of Mancini's data reveal considerable scatter,testifying to the uncertainty implicit in the decay rates derived from the model. However,the Mancini model does at least allow onto determine the sensitivity of coliform bacteria to sunlight intensity. A more complete model of bacterial die-off would necessarily be considerably more complex than the Mancini model. Editorial Comments The final report by the Pis should be written for an audience that is potentially unfamiliar with the issues at Huntington Beach.This requires greater clarity and more careful explanations. In many chapters,shorter pamgmphs would be helpful.The report requires a number of edits,the most general of which are discussed in this section. Detailed editorial comments are contained within the appendices. The rule to follow is that a short explanation should be stated for each statement or conclusion.The authors should pay close attention to grammar for all chapters.The executive summary,especially,should be carefully edited for clarity,since this is the only section that most people will read. Each chapter should be understandable and complete unto itself,or at least have clear references to chapters where certain issues are explained. Some chapters are long with many subheading and some are very short with few subheadings. Also,some important information is contained only in the figures and tables,making the reader's task more difficult. In general, readers should be informed of the experimental design of the study before the results are discussed.The document would be easier to read if each chapter had this structure: I.Intmdnrtion 2. Goals or Objectives 3. Experimental Design and Methods 7 4.Results 5.Conclusions In Chapter 1,the objectives of the study mrcat be clearly stated in a separate sub-section (objectives are not hypotheses),and those objectives must match the charter as understood by the s.The objectives listed here resemble those in the original work order, which caused so much confusion at the last meeting between the Panel and s. Is the objective of this study to determine where the plume goes,whether it affects the beach at all,or whether it causes AB411 beach closures? This chapter should more effectively introduce the complex nature of the study,particularly the bacterial sampling,to readers, explaining the rationale for creating the type 1,type 2 and type 3 violations and discuss how the authors would use these categories of violation to interpret results. Without an explanation,these chosen types appear to be arbitrary. Chapter 2 needs a better introduction to the bacterial sampling methods,and should be organized along the lines described above.The three bacterial violation categories are used in the discussion of this chapter,however,since the basis for these three types of violations were not clearly established,the reader cannot determine the significance of these violation events. In addition,Chapter 9,the methods section,could precede Chapter 2. Also in Chapter 2,combine the plots for total coliform on a single page,one above the other,to show the consistent M2 pattern and along-shore propagation. Do the same for each species.This will allow a clearer discussion of patterns and make life easier for the reader.Compare the timing of observed poleward motions of total coliform with timing of flood currents measured at the ADCP closest to the shore. The PIs should also plot the bacteria data from lines 1 and 2 in Figure 3-16 of Volume 2. This would allow them to examine the question of sampling aliasing.The analysis in Figure 3-16 should be repeated for all the intensive sampling periods. It is also important to plot vertical sections(not 3D renditions)of the ammonium data like was done for the bacteria data so that they can be examined for coherent cross-shelf structure. References Mancini,J.L. (1978). Numerical estimates of coliform mortality rates under various conditions.✓otanal oJthe Water Pollafoe Connol Federafon Nov:2477-2484. Pineda,J. (1999). Circulation and larval distribution in internal tidal bore warm fronts. G'nmology aedOceaeagtaphy 44.1400-1414 8 USGS science for a changing world Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination ., Investigation, Phase III .. Coastal Circulation and Transport Patterns: The Likelihood of OCSD's Plume Impacting the Huntington Beach Shoreline Executive Summary Open-File Report 03-62 v .r v v U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey v Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III Coastal Circulation and Transport Patterns: The Likelihood of OCSD's Plume Impacting the Huntington Beach, CA Shoreline EXECUTIVE SUMMARY W Open-File Report 03-62 2003 By Marlene Noble', Jingping Xu', Leslie Rosenfeld', John Largier', Peter Hamilton', Burt Jones', George Robertson' v V ' U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA ' Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA ' Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA v ' Scientific Application International Corporation, Raleigh, NC v ' University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Orange County Sanitation District, Fountain Valley, CA �r This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological D D ry y Survey editorial standard or with the North American Stratigraphic Code.Any use of trade, product,or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.Government. v v v TABLE OF CONTENTS .r `d 1. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 v 2. Hypotheses . . . . .. ........ .. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ....3 d 3. Objectives and Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .........5 4. Measurement Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... ... . ... . . . . . . . . .... .....6 5. Major Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . .... .....6 5.1. Surfzone Bacteria Contamination Patterns . . .... . .. . . . ..... . ..... . . .. . . . .........6 v 5.I.1. Multi-year Pattems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . ... . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . ..... . . . .6 5.1.2. Summer 2001 Patterns . ... . ........ . ........... . . . . .. . ..................7 52. Outfall Plume Tracking . . . . . . . ... ...... ............ . . ... . . ..... . . ... .. . . . . . .I I 5.2.1. Spatial Patterns of the Plume ..... . . . . .......... . . . . .. . . ..... ......... . . .I I 5.2.2. Bacteria Concentrations . . . . ...... . . . ........... . . . . . . . .... . ... . . . . . . . . .14 yr 5.3. Coastal Ocean Transport Processes ..... . . . . ........... . . . .. . . ........... . .. . . .15 5.3.1. Subtidal Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ...... . . . . . . . . . . .... ........ . . . . .15 5.32. Diumal and Semidiumal Transport . . . .... . . ....... . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . .17 5.32.1. Seabreeze and Diurnal Currents 17 . . ... .. ..... . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . 5.32.2. Semidiumal Currents 19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . v 5.32.3. Cross-Shelf Transport Events in the Coastal Ocean . . . . . . . ..... .. . ... . . . . . 20 v 5.3.3. Nearshore Cross-Shore Transport 21 5.3.4. Resuspended Sediment Transport . . . . . . .... . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .24 V 6. Coastal Transport Processes and Their Relationship to Significant Bacterial Patterns . . . . . . . . . .25 v v 6.1. Subtidal Cross-Shelf Transport Pathways: Newport Canyon . . . . . . ... . . . ........... . .25 6.2. Diumal and Semidiumal Transport Pathways . . . . . . . . . . .. . ...... .. . . ............ 27 6.3. Coastal Ocean Event Transport Pathways . . . . . . ......... . ..... . .. ......... . . . . . .27 6.4. Sediment Transport Pathways . . . . . . ... . . . . ........... . . .... . ........ . .. . . . . . .28 6.5. Nearshore Transport Pathways . . ... .................. . . . . . . ... . ... . . . .. . . . . . .28 v7. Conclusions ... ........... . . . . . .... . . . . . .... . . . . ... ........... . . . . . . . .. . . ....29 v8. References . . . . ... . . . ..... . . . . . .... . . . . ..... . . . ... . ........... . . . . . . . .. ......30 v `r ar d Draft Final Report on attached CD v Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III Coastal Circulation and Transport Patterns:The Likelihood of OCSD's Offshore V Wastewater Plume Impacting the Huntington Beach, CA Shoreline V TABLE OF CONTENTS v v VOLUME I: Surfzone Sampling and Moored Observations Chapter 1. Introduction and Background v Leslie Rosenfeld, Marlene Noble, Peter Hamilton, Burt Jones, John Largier, Jingping Xu V V Chapter 2. Surfzone Bacteria Patterns Leslie Rosenfeld v v Chapter 3. Subtidal Circulation Pathways Peter Hamilton Chapter 4. Newport Canyon Transport Pathway Kevin Orzech, Marlene Noble Chapter 5. Seabreeze V Peter Hamilton Chapter 6.Tidal Transport Pathways Marlene Noble, Peter Hamilton �qd Chapter 7. Sediment Resuspension and Transport Pathway Jingping Xu Chapter 8. Near-shore Circulation Pathways John Largier V Chapter 9. Methodology Peter Hamilton, Burt Jones, John Largier, v Marlene Noble, Leslie Rosenfeld, Jingping Xu VOLUME II: Hydrographic Surveys Burt Janes '.✓ v v iv v Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation, Phase III Coastal Circulation and Transport Patterns:The Likelihood of Orange County Sanitation District's Offshore Wastewater Plume Impacting the Huntington Beach, CA Shoreline ABSTRACT A consortium of investigators have conducted an extensive investigation of the coastal ocean circulation and transport pathways off Huntington Beach,California with the aim of identifying any causal links that may exist between the offshore discharge of wastewater by Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)and the significant bacterial contamination observed along the Huntington Beach shoreline. This is the third study supported by OCSD to determine possible land-based and coastal ocean sources for the significant bacterial contamination levels measured during several summer periods off Huntington Beach. d Although the study identifies several possible coastal ocean pathways by which diluted wastewater may �r be transported to the beach, including internal tide, sea-breeze and subtidal flow features, there were no direct observations of either the high bacteria concentrations seen in the OCSD plume at the shelf break reaching the shoreline in significant levels or of an association between the existence of a coastal ocean `d process and beach contamination at or above AB411 levels. It is concluded that the OCSD plume is not a major cause of beach contamination; no causal links could be demonstrated.This conclusion is based on y, the absence of direct observation of plume-beach links,on analysis of the spatial and temporal patterns of shoreline contamination and coastal ocean processes, and on the observation of higher levels of contamination at the beach than in the plume. d I. BACKGROUND The beaches off Huntington Beach, California(Figure 1) were closed or posted for several months in the summers of 1999 and 2000 because bacteria levels in the swash zone exceeded beach sanitation standards contained in California Health and Safety Code§115880(Assembly Bill 411, Statutes of 1997, Chapter 765;AB411)for extended periods. Because these closures and postings occurred during the peak of summer seasons, they had a major impact on the local, recreational and business communities. There were a wide variety of studies conducted during Phase I (OCSD, 1999) and Phase 11 (Grant at al., 2000) of the Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigations, but specific sources for many of the contamination events that caused beach closures and postings could not be determined. However,possible ..� contamination pathways from upland sources,adjacent estuaries and the coastal ocean were identified. In particular, it was suggested that bacteria-rich effluent from the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) outfall plume might be brought to shore through several coastal ocean pathways. Bacteria from this effluent plume might then account for the contamination events observed along the Huntington Beach .� shoreline.To identify and evaluate potential coastal-ocean pathways,OCSD formed a Technical Advisory Committee(TAC)to help design and oversee a Phase III study for the summer of 2001.The TAC formed a hypothesis ad-hoc committee consisting of regulators, research scientists, environmental groups and interested citizens that formulated a series of potential transport mechanisms after considering historical contamination patterns, evaluating known coastal ocean processes and obtaining public comments to determine processes that were most likely to contaminate the beach in summer. v V I W V 1r tiV 1 V am 21 N I> V Line 1 • Line 2 15N12N I� V 40 Llne3a ••�'.,• O��j ■nocr a,n:,,menir�iwm.ls.a�nvw V ,. Line4 `,•` H801• �'., , nwc.a wrwn• rrea,a •am.,. V •,•FIBO a i 5 V •.y HB03 .* • .� 65 wport Beach V HBO •. yy� �•;`, V' HB09` ••••�H613j•;.' O V HB • T• V HB10 v V H807 • V H8111* b HB12 V v Pl YC y Mooring 0 CTD station ITUV line 0 Surfzone sampling station V V Figure la. Map of the region,the mooring sites and surfzone sampling stations. Sediment transport instruments V are deployed at HOW, HBO5, HB07 and HB11.The meteorological buoy is at HB07. Inset shows instrumentations of y, a typical mooring. V V V V V 2 VAO v 2. HYPOTHESES v Field observations have shown, and plume models predict, that the OCSD effluent plume remains trapped below the thermocline in the summer season(MEC final report,2001)due to strong stratification. .r Hence, the primary hypothesis of this program was that coastal ocean processes that transport water and suspended material below the thermocline have the greatest potential to transport the OCSD plume into the nearshore region (water depths of 10-15 m (3349 f )) during the summer months. If the plume was carried into the nearshore region, it was possible that local beaches were at risk of significant bacterial contamination. Internal tides .r Internal tides are the most likely coastal-ocean process that could transport the submerged wastewater .r plume into the nearshore regions. Once nearshore,other possible pathways could bring the water from the nearshore region into the surfzone.These nearshore pathways include: .r N it W °° V� meters 1 bo e \ `y is ocs imz ro°°a�\ — [mo�nna �/ trt�`ntrca \ `.r Figure tb. Locations of instrument array deployed in shallower water during HB PIII. `.r v `r �r 3 v a. If the effluent plume is transported into the nearshore region, it could enter the proximity of the y AES Corporation power plant cooling water intake and discharge pipes and be entrained by the gar intake and/or discharge jet.Through either pathway, the effluent would then contaminate the New thermal plume, which could easily be moved onshore through buoyant spreading,wind forcing or other processes. b. Shoaling,or run-up,of the internal tides could transport sub-thermocline water potentially br contaminated with effluent into the surfzone and onto the beach (Figure 2). er %W Beach Ocean Thermocline Plume Without .. Beach Ocean TherfirldlZ Olin Plume With Internal or y d_ v Faure 2. Schematic of cross-shore transport of the plume from the outfall by internal tidal currents. rr Other subsurface transport mechanisms Subsurface cross-shelf transport by other coastal ocean processes could move the submerged plume to the nearshore region. Possible transport mechanisms include: �r a. Upwelling of sub-thermocline water driven by alongshore, low-frequency winds b. Forced swash of sub-thermocline waters driven by diurnal winds. v c.Transport via Newport Canyon. The effluent plume tray be transported into Newport Canyon by downcoast currents,then upwelled out .,,. of the canyon.Uponast Bow in the nearshore region may transport this water toward Huntington Beach. d.Vertical mixing. The subsurface effluent plume could be mixed into the near-surface layers of the coastal ocean by winds,breaking internal waves or other ocean-mixing processes.The contaminated water may then %W move more easily ashore as it is no longer trapped beneath the thermocline. rr 4 r br v v e.A combination of specific subtidal transport events. �.+ For example,if subtidal flows near the outfall are weak or stalled, the effluent would not be carried as quickly as it is normally carried from the region. Hence,a larger volume of effluent is potentially available to be transported toward the beach. Sediment mosport processes Particulate matter discharged by the OCSD outfall may settle out near the outfall and may contain high levels of bacteria. Surface or internal waves could resuspend this bottom sediment and the particle-bound bacteria. Cross-shelf transport processes may then bring this material toward the shore. The research .� program was designed to monitor this process,although the TAC ad-hoc committee thought that sediment- transport processes were not the most likely mechanism for transporting effluent bacteria to shore because fine material normally moves from shallow to deeper water. Buoyant particles r, It is possible that buoyant particles(e.g.,oil and grease)discharged at the outfall could reach the surface even when the water column is stratified; bacteria may adhere to these particles. The TAC ad-hoc v committee discussed transport processes in the sea-surface microlayer, but did not think these processes r W would amount for either the high values or the spatial and temporal patterns of bacterial contamination of the beach. Monitoring data from OCSD have shown poor association (e-0.08) between grease, oil and fecal coliform bacteria in the offshore region(SAIC and MEC, 1991). Shoreline microbiology sampling has shown that the presence of grease particles on the beach is rare. Therefore, this element was not included as design criteria for either the hydrographic or moored sampling programs. 3. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS v The principle objective for this multi-faceted measurement program was to determine if there is a causal v link between offshore wastewater discharge and significant bacterial contamination at or above state beach sanitation standards(i.e.,AB411)along the Huntington Beach shoreline.This objective included the aim v of identifying coastal ocean processes that could explain any observed links or that could provide insight r, to the possibility of shoreward transport of outfall plume waters.A secondary objective was to determine the principal coastal-ocean circulation patterns in this region,which will allow for the evaluation of other v potential contamination pathways suggested in the future. A final objective was to compare conditions v+ during the summer of 2001 with those in 1999 and other years that have a high incidence of surfzone bacteria contamination. v In order to meet these objectives, data from moored arrays and hydmgmphic and beach surveys were r, used to evaluate transport pathways or processes that could potentially bring the effluent plume from the outer shelf into the nearshore regions.The evaluation process consisted of three primary segments: v v • Do the pathways or processes exist in the coastal ocean? What are the dominant characteristics of those pathways or processes? • Can the pathways or processes transport material in the effluent plume to the neanshore region? v • Is there a causal association between identified coastal ocean processes or pathways and contamination events that exceed AB411 standards in the surfzone? —In the spatial surveys of effluent plume characteristics off Huntington Beach. 1.0 —In the spatial and temporal structure of coastal ocean circulation patterns determined from the 4.0 moored array data. v v v v V v 4. MEASUREMENT PROGRAM V V The measurement program consisted of., 1)a moored array that would collect data to provide a general V description and understanding of coastal circulation and mixing patterns, 2) a complementary hydrographic mapping program that would provide a more detailed description of the spatial distribution V of water column properties,and 3)a surfzone sampling program for bacteria. V Instrumented moorings at 12 locations monitored current velocity, temperature, and salinity at many V depths every few minutes for 4 months in the summer/fall of 2001 (Figure la). This deployment period `, spans the time period when shoreline bacterial contamination has historically been at its maximum.Near- bottom wave, water-clarity and suspended sediments were collected at 4 sites to monitor sediment transport processes. Real-time meteorological data were collected at the shelf break.This army monitored 4.J coastal ocean transport processes with temporal frequencies ranging from a few minutes (e. g. internal V waves) to hours and days (e. g. internal tides and wind-driven processes) along 2 cross-shelf transport pathways and over a nearshore region next to Newport canyon. Additional moorings were deployed in V water depths less than 10 m from July to October 2001 to address transport pathways between the V nearshore and the surfzone. V The principal moored array was designed by the US Geological Survey (USGS) and prepared and V deployed through a cooperative effort among the USGS,the Naval Postgraduate School(NPS)and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).The nearshore set of moorings was deployed by Scripps V Institution of Oceanography(SIO)under contract with OCSD and MBC Applied Environmental Services V (MBC)through a contract with the AES power plant. V A complementary hydrographic mapping program measured the spatial distribution of water column V properties including temperature, salinity, ammonia, bacteria, and other properties of the water column during six surveys centered around periods of maximum tidal range (spring tides) (Figure la). These periods were chosen because historical data indicated that most bacterial exceedances at the beach V occurred during spring tides (MEC, 2000). Five of the six surveys overlapped the moored army V deployment.A series of CTD casts monitored water properties along 4 nearshore lines that ran parallel to the beach.Simultaneously,a towed undulating vehicle(TUI)monitored water column properties along 10 V offshore lines oriented approximately perpendicular to the beach.The hydrographic surveys were designed V by OCSD, with advice from the University of Southern California (USC),and conducted by USC,MEC V Analytical Systems,and OCSD. V Three types of fecal indicator bacteria(total coliform, fecal coliform and Enterccocci)are collated in V ankle-depth water 5 days/week(including one weekend day)as part of OCSD's standard beach monitoring plan. Samples ate generally collected between 5 and 10 AM local time,with sampling proceeding from the VQd northernmost station to the southernmost. During the six hydrographic surveys, additional microbiology V samples were collected hourly along the beach for 48 hours at the standard OCSD sampling sites(with the exception of the first cruise in May when the hourly sampling was done for only 36 hours). V V `r 5. MAJOR FINDINGS ` 5.1. Surfzone Bacterial Contamination Patterns r 5.1.1. Multi-year Patterns V The total and fecal coliforrns and Enterococci concentrations measured in the surfzone between 1 July 1998 V and 31 December 2001 were analyzed with respect to their temporal and spatial variability.The majority of V samples have bacterial concentrations less than,or equal to,the minimum detection limit(58%of samples for V 6 %W1 `✓ V V V V V r total coliform, 72%for fecal coliform,and 65%for Enterococci).Single sample bacteria concentrations were •r compared to both the single sample(SS)and the geometric mean monthly(MM)AB411 standards: V Total coliform> 10,000 mpn 1100 ml(SS); 1,000 mpn/ 100 ml (MM) Total coliform> 1000 mpn 1100 ml and Total coliform/fecal coliform< 10(SS) V Fecal coliform>400 mpn/ 100 nil (SS);200 mpn/ 100 ml(MM) Enterococci > 104 mpn/ 100 ml(SS);35 mpn/ 100 ml(MM) There are numerous exceedances of the AB411 single sample standards (3% of the samples for total v✓ coliform, 2% for fecal coliform and 6% for Enerococci). Here, the total coliform exceedances are conservatively defined as having values greater than 1000 mpn/100ml.The majority of those exceedances are for Enterocoeci, as was found in previous studies (Grant et al. 2000). The percentage of samples v exceeding the AB411 standards is not significantly different for the HB Phase III period when compared to the 1998-2001 period. Because of nighttime sampling, there was a slightly higher percentage of the single sample Enterococci concentrations with values greater than the allowable geometric monthly mean level in the summer of 2001 (22%vs. 17%). The incidence of high concentrations of bacteria confirm a previously identified relationship with the lunar cycle(MEC, 2000; Grant et al.,2000), such that higher bacteria concentrations are associated with maximum tidal ranges (i.e. spring tides).The larger the tidal range (or equivalently, the lower the daily lower low water,or the higher the daily higher high water), the higher the probability of a contamination event. It is interesting to note that in southern California,the timing of the largest spring tides relative to V the annual cycle changes very little from year to year. The phases of the diurnal and semidiurnal tidal constituents are such that the largest spring tides fall in the summer(May-August)and winter(December- February).The larger of the two ebb tides(higher high water to lower low water)falls at night during the summer spring tides, with the higher high tide at 8.10 PM local time. v 5.1.2.Summer 2001 Patterns Surfzone bacteria samples were collected once per day, five days per week, during the HB Phase lit V study period Increased levels of all three fecal indicator bacteria are found more fiequently in the surfzone north of the Santa Ana River than south of it(Figure 3). Excessive levels of total and fecal coliform are generally confined to the 0-15N and 3N-9N regions,respectively.High concentrations of Enterococei were found throughout the range on a number of occasions. �.o These distinct spatial patterns for coliform and Enterococci bacteria could be classified into three types of events. In section six of this report, we will determine whether specific coastal-ocean processes are related to the presence or absence of these event categories. V Type 1:Total or fecal coliform exceeded AB411 single sample standards at one or more of the stations from 3N to 12N during a 24-h period starting at 0000 PST. IWO Type 2:Enterococci exceeded AB411 standards at three or rrore of the numbered surfone stations from 39S ,..o to 39N,including at least one station from 3N to 12N,during a 24-h period starting at 00:00 PST. Type 3: Enterococci exceeded AB411 at any station from 3N to 12N on any day on which there is not a type I or type 2 event.This type was added to ensure that all days on which any single sample standard was exceeded in the Huntington Beach area was counted as an event. V V v 7 V V V Total Coliform rso ABC77 3e slander 30 9,0 y 24 y 3.6 v 2 1 2 3.0 6 2.6 v O 2.0 1.5 2 1.0 v 6 -,6 0.0 8 -24 -30 -36 May Jun Jul Aup SeP Ocr v v ry Fecal Coliform 1100 z 3e 30 11110 24 •.O 13 5.6� ,2 3.p v g —— 2.5 0 -- 2.0 10/ 110 13 O.6 v -29 3 -30 y ON -3tl May Jun Jul AUB Sap Oct v v Enterococci v 2 36 a 30 24 3.2 16 2.6 ,2 2.4 6 2.6 0 .a e 1.2 v -12 0.0 -16 0.4 -29 6.6 v 30 O -36 Lag70(mpJ100 m) M®Y Jun Jul Aug EtaP Oct 2001 (POT) 'v Figure 3. Loglo of total coliform,fecal coliform,and Enterococci concentration (mpn/100 ml)are plotted versus 1e1 time and distance alongshore.The data set subsempled to no more then daily values,was used. Black We indicate the day and location of each sample.AB411 single sample standards are indicated on the colorbars. Note the scale VIVA differences on the colorbars.Data is contoured with PlotPlus on a 180 x 13 grid(time and distance, respectively) using cay-5 and nrng=2. The cay value determines the interpolation scheme.Cay=O means Laplacian interpolation day Is used. As cay is increased,spline interpolation predominates over Laplacian. For pure spline interpolation v cay=infinity. Grid points are set to"undefined",and not used,if farther than nrng away from the nearest data point. 1/ 8 V %0 `0 `r Almost every surfzone sample between 39S and 39N that exceeded an AB411 single sample standard �. during the HB Phase III study fell on a day characterized as a type 1,2,or 3 event(Figure 4).The sea level data confirm that contamination events tend to occur during spring tides. Surfzone Samples that Exceeded AB411 Single Sample Criteria and Events ..r 1 39 — - - - -•-•- 33 ._ _ _ _. _ _ ._,_ .. > 27 ... .. ._ .._ _..:...�. . ':.:... __. �... ._ ._ . _._. cc in 21 ... ._ ._ -._._. m15 ... .. ._ _.._...._...._. . ._ ... _._ . ......_._ _ ._._. ._._._. 5 12 _ 0 3 « - - •-• .. 0 - _._« -...... . ... .. ...... m3 _ ....._.. .._._. m -6 .. 0 _g ... .. ._ _.._ _. -.Ore...._. ......_._ _ .�. �._._. N -15 ... .. ._ _..- _. __... _ �.._.. _.._._. O '� II -21 ... .. ._ . .._ _. _._ _..._ -. ._ ._ ..._.._. ....._._. yr rA .r _39 . ... ... .. . .._._........ . .... ... ._.._. ......_........... ...._-_.._- ... ......_........__..::i ur 05/01/2001 06/01/2001 07/01/2001 08/01/2001 09/01/2001 10/01/2001 11/01/2001 .� PST .,. 0 total coliform. (•- 10.000) 0 fecal coliform, ( =400) r * total coliform (+=1000) ... (tot/fgcal<10), 4 Enterococci, (+= 104) Red symbol indicates ma:. detection limit .r .,r Figure 4. The vertical bars indicate days on which bacterial events occurred,blue=type 1,magenta=type 2, gray=types 1 and 2, gold=type 3.Sea level measured at Los Angeles is shown at the bottom of the figure.A black r dot is plotted at each time(GMT)and location a sample was taken. Colored symbols are plotted at the time(GMT) and location of samples exceeding A8411 single sample standards. The size of the symbol is proportional to the ratio of the measured bacterial concentration to the A8411 criteria. The symbol size for a sample equal to the .r AB411 criteria is shown to the right of the indicator species in the legend. 9 .r v r,r V In addition to the daily samples,additional bacteria samples were taken in the surfzone at stations I SS V to 21N every hour for 48 hours during spring tides while the six hydrographic cruises were being �rY conducted.The only exception is that during the first cruise in May,hourly sampling was done for only 36 V hours, with one several-hour break. All three fecal indicator bacteria show a day-night cycle, with the highest values occurring at night.This pattern is most pronounced for Enterococci,which rebounds to high nighttime values almost as soon as the sun goes down(Figure 5). Enterococci exceedances,wherever they r occur, do so overwhelmingly between sunset and sunrise. V 60 2.3 m y . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 21.5°C r✓ c 50 j Sea lev I y a V 40 v %/ ■ 21N 00 6N,S i LU 20- ■ HB01 T 0.5 ma : N,S 00 IN 10- ■ ■ , ■ O n 120C .,. 6 our a cu :_ o 'o ■ J -0.45 m Noon Noon Noon �r 6119 6120 6121 v rr Figure 5. The ratio of Enterococci concentrations to the A8411 single sample standard at stations 15S to 21N for the 2nd intensive sampling period are plotted together with sampling times at station 0(pink dots), Los Angeles %W sea level(red line),and temperature 0.5m above bottom at HB01 (blue line). Only samples exceeding 104 mpn/100mi are shown here. A local time reference is used. LI Even though total coliform has a day night cycle, it shows a stronger relationship to the semidiurnal tidal cycle.The highest values are found preferentially near low tide at station 0(next to the mouth of the Santa Ana River) and nearby stations to the north of it. Data also suggest that there is upcoast •r (northwestward propagation) from station 0,with a speed of about 30 cm/s (0.7 mph) (Figure 6). V These results suggest that total and fecal coliform levels are controlled principally by the phase of the tide. Enterococci seem to be controlled more by the day-night cycle. However, we can not definitively V separate the two effects because the hourly sampling programs were separated by about two weeks. Hence, night samples were always taken on the larger ebb tide.Also,without reliable information as to the die-off V rate of the different bacterial indicators under the prevailing light,temperature,and salinity conditions,we V cannot say how the temporal patterns are influenced by the bacterial life span. V 10 V V V V 21- Total,Coliform 18 30 cm/s `r `m 15 . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. 4.0 if c12 . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ..r < 3.5 m c � 3.0 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c . . . .. . . .. 2.5 3 . . . . . . .. s 2.0 0 0 0 1.5 $ -3 y 1.0 U C .r m -y 0.5 15 y/ -12 0.0 -15 6 12 16 20 0 4 6 12 16 20 0 4 6 12 16 Ju15 Julio Jul 7 .. Figure 6. The logtg of total coliform concentration(mpN100 ml)is plotted versus local time and distance alongshore. Black.'a indicate the time and location of each sample. .r These results suggest that tidal flow out of the Santa Ana River may be a source of high bacteria .. concentration, potentially impacting the beach to I5N - particularly for total coliform. There is some indication that there may also be a local source of bacterial contamination, particularly high in fecal coliform, near 6N. v Enterococci,which have caused many of the beach postings,appear to have multiple sources.Also, it is interesting to note that the concentrations of Enterococcus observed in the surfzone are often higher than the concentrations observed in the effluent plume.This enhanced concentration suggests that the source of .r the bacteria may not be the effluent plume.The bacterial ratios in the effluent plume suggest that if high v Enlemcoccus counts were due to the plume then they should be associated with high total and fecal coliform counts.This association is often missing in the surfzone(Figure 3). .r .r 5.2. Outfall Plume Tracking 5.2.1. Spatial Patterns of the Plume During the summer of 2001, the distributions of water properties that act as tracers of the plume were mapped during 6 spring tide events between May and September 2001 (Figure la). Periods of maximum ..r tidal range(spring tides) were selected as beach contamination is most common during spring tides.The plume tracers were mapped repeatedly for 48 hours during each period.The region between 400 in and 3.3 .i I I err km(0.25 to 2 miles)offshore of the beach was mapped at 4-hour intervals with CTD profiles,resulting in V 12 realizations during each period.The region between 3.3 km (2 miles) and beyond the shelf break was bra' mapped with a towed undulating vehicle every 8 hours, which produced up to 6 three-dimensional maps r o of the offshore region during each period. The OCSD outfall plume was defined by a combination of a low-salinity anomaly and elevated fecal r indicator bacteria. In waters less than 14`C,salinities more than 0.005 below what would be expected from temperature are taken as an indication of plume presence(Figure 7).Within this temperature region,bacteria V abundances greater than the detection limits were considered to be due to the outfall plume. r HB3 Cruise 05 August 19-21, 2001 �r 22 1 +, , v + + +++ + + cr.++ V 20 I �._. + v Upper Layer ' S=0 021948'T+ 33.161 +h+ ' + U + 1e _ a Intermediate Layer + S III:OD08322'T+ 33.3818- yt v f 14 _ ..'T+I 10 -4+ 12 Lower Layer v to 33.1 33.2 33.3 33A 33.5 me 33.7 338 y Salinity (psu) �r Figure 7.T-S plot for all of the TUV transacts for Cruise 5,August 19-21,2001.Each color indicates a different tow. V The black lines indicate the lower salinity boundary of the ambientT-S measured upcurrent from the OCSD outfall. In this case,upcurrent was upcoast from the outfall.The equations describe the lines in T--S space and are used to v calculate the salinity anomaly.Values to the left of the ambientT-S lines are assumed to result from freshwater inputs.In this example,anomalously low salinities below 14.5-C are due to the effluent plume and above 17-C fir/ result from the influence of surface runoff into the coastal ocean. V Both measurements and subsequent predictions from a model that used the continuously measured y density field from the mooring near the outfall site (HB07) during the summer of 2001 showed that the rtrr outfall plume remained submerged below the thermocline over the 4 months of the program.The average depth of the top of the plume was 31an (102 ft) beneath the surface. Even during an earlier measurement period when the stratification was weak, such as during late August and early September 1999,the plume y never rose to less than 14 in (46 ft). 12 V V In most cases the plume remained offshore and extended along the coast in the direction of the measured .n currents. For example,during the third cruise(July 5-7),the plume was submerged and remained below a v depth of 25 to (82 ft) in the offshore region. Because the Flow below 30 m(98 ft) was weak and variable, the plume was advected both up and downcoast from the outfall diffuser(Figure 8). It appeared that the plume extended shoreward into Newport Canyon and may have shoaled somewhat but still remained below .r 20 m(66 ft) water depth. An additional low salinity feature was often present at the sea surface in the nearshore region of our .,r study area(Figure 8).This feature was found in at least four of the six hydrographic surveys.When present, this low salinity layer could extend alongshore across the entire sampling region and extended offshore for a distance of 2-3 km(1.2-1.9 miles).This low salinity layer is much warmer than the plume and possibly represents runoff from the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers that has been transported downcoast by near-surface currents. .r `r .15 `� Tow 8 Tow 9 Tow 5 surfa ;0.00 .10 0- -10 -20 O 3-30 v/ 3-40 -117 .05 7.9] .50- -177.98 v .60 -117.99 18 r✓ 33,64 - -118.01 33.87 .118.02 33.62 81.67 118.03 Longitude Latitude 33.fi 73g -118.04 30.5 -118.05 33. -11806 37.56 Figure 8. Spatial distribution of the salinity anomaly showing the distribution of effluent plume during a period of weak alongshore flow during July 5-7.2001.The effluent plume is clearly seen offshore and beneath 30 meters depth,centered on the outran which is indicated by the green line extending from the beach to about 60 meters depth.The diffuser is the portion of the line underneath the offshore end of Tow 8.Another region of low salinity water is found at the surface nearshore.This water is runoff probably from Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers. 13 .r V V 5.2.2. Bacteria Concentrations V An important objective of this study was to determine whether cross-shelf currents transported the outfall plume to the beach. Cross-shelf currents can move the plume shoreward, especially during those V times when the alongshore currents below 30 m (98 R) depth are relatively weak, as was observed during V the third cruise(Figure 9). During this survey,the lowest concentrations of bacteria were found on Line 2, V, which is 0.8 km (0.5 miles) from the beach. Higher bacteria concentrations were observed inshore along Line 1 (0.4 km from shore (0.25 miles)) and in the surfzone. Higher concentrations were also observed V offshore,along Line 3 (2 km from shore(1.2 miles))and Line 4.This pattern was typical of the entire set yr of cruises.The lowest concentrations of bacteria were always found along Line 2, even though there may V have been exceedances of A13411 standards offshore and inshore of this line. The inference from this is that bacteria from the plume may extend shoreward as close as 2 km (1.2 miles) from the beach, but the V bacteria do not appear to cross into the region within 1 km (0.6 miles) of the beach. The higher bacteria V concentrations found 0.4 km (0.25 miles) from shore along Line I are likely associated with the high concentrations observed on the beach. V V 03:00 V o V m Shoreline V F 23:34 a0 15 10 5 - 0 -5 -10 E V 5 Line 1 6 V 1020 15 10 5 0 -5 10 (0.4 km w V .5 Line 2 rr 10 (0.8 kmJ� —° 15 w V a0 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 N8111 V standard E -10 v L Line 3 I N -2) (2 km) N o y -30 a0 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 V 0 V -10 V -2o Line 4 sees � (3.3km) y •30 V -40 V 20 15 10 5 0 .5 -10 yr V Figure 9.Concentration of E.Coli plotted as lines parallel with the shore.The top panel shows the distribution of VW on the beach during the four hours of this sampling cycle.The vertical axis in this panel is time and the horizontal axis is distance alongshore relative to the Santa Ana River.The remaining panels show the concentration V of E.Coll in the water column offshore from the beach. In these panels the vertical axis is depth and the horizontal axis is the same as in the top panel. V 14 V V V V v Fecal indicator bacteria in the submerged effluent plume were well correlated with each other.The ratio of total coliform: fecal coliform: Enterococcus is typically about 25:5:1 in the main body of the plume. This ratio is relatively constant with distance away from the outfall discharge. This suggests that die-off rates for the 3 bacterial species in the plume may be relatively uniform in this environment. In earlier plume tracking surveys (MEC, 2001), high bacteria concentrations were observed at least 12.5 km (7.8 v miles) downcoast from the outfall.Transit times from the outfall were estimated to be on the order of 2 days.Both these results suggest that the die-off rates of the bacteria may be low in the center of the plume, where the waters are dark and cold. The ratios among the 3 fecal indicator bacteria become more variable at lower bacterial concentrations. Enterococcus appears to decrease more rapidly compared to total coliform bacteria when the Enterococcus concentrations falls below 100 MPN/100 ml and total coliforn bacteria fall below 1000 MPN/100 mi. Whether this is real or an artifact of increased variability at lower concentrations is uncertain. 5.3. Coastal Transport Processes 53.1. Subtidal Transport When currents associated with the tides and sea breeze are removed from the records, the remaining flows are substantial and play the major role in the longer term dispersal of the outfall plume.These low frequency or subtidal flows have patterns that are caused by circulation processes over the larger scale coastal region of the Southern California Bight. In the summer,there is a substantial down-coast(towards San Diego)mean current over the San Pedro shelf that has a maximum near the surface on the outer shelf. This down-coast flow decreases in magnitude with depth and toward shore.It is generally unrelated to local winds over the shelf.However,there is some indication that these subtidal fluctuations in along-coast flow v are related to wind forcing off central Baja California(via coastal trapped wave propagation). Figure 10 shows the mean current vectors for the period of summer 2001. Surface mean currents of 10 to 12 em/s (0.2 mph)on the outer shelf can transport material down-coast a distance of 10 km(6 miles) in one day. v At depths below about 70 m (230 ft) over the San Pedro continental slope, seaward of the outfall, the flow is predominantly up-coast(towards Palos Verdes)and constitutes an undercurrent.This undercurrent occasionally rises to shallower depths for a few days and floods the outer shelf with up-coast currents. "d Figure 10 shows that at depths below about 30 m(98 ft)on the outer shelf, the mean flows are directed weakly up-coast. Imposed on this mean flow pattern are fluctuations with periods of 7 to 20 days that have a magnitude similar to the mean flow.They are largest at the surface and on the outer shelf and decrease with depth and towards shore.In the upper layers,the currents are parallel to the general trend of the coastline,but in the lower `.' layers the currents follow the trend of the depth contours (isobaths). Shorter period (7 day) fluctuations dominate in the near shore(depths< 15 m(49ft)). Maximum currents can exceed 60 and 30 cm/s(1.3-0.7 mph)on the outer and inner shelf, respectively. Given the long periods of the fluctuations,the low frequency surface currents can be set in the same along-coast direction for periods on the order of weeks. v The fluctuations across the shelf and with depth are generally all in the same direction at any given time. v However,in the near shore,alongshelf current fluctuations are found to be closely related to the alongshore winds and somewhat disconnected from currents on the middle and outer shelf.This means that flows in the near shore may be in the opposite direction to flows over the middle and outer shelf.This provides a current regime in which plume material could be transported down coast towards the Newport Canyon by flows over the outer shelf,and then be transported up coast by the reversed nearshom currents. 15 5 cm/s — a 5m —� 10 m %W 25 m „ o 45 m > 65 m 125 m iQ 170 m „ NO T I Figure 10. Mean subtidal velocity vectors at the indicated depths for July 23 to October 8,2001 At the depths of the outfall plume on the outer shelf(-30 to 55 on (98 tol80 ft)), the combination of weak mean currents and large along-shelf fluctuations leads to the plume being equally likely to be y transported up-or down-coast during this summer period.These subtidal currents are the most effective of all the transport mechanisms for dispersing the main body of the plume.This dispersal is primarily along the isobaths rather than across the shelf. The subtidal cross-shelf currents are small and apparently not a 'rr major factor in the movement of cold water towards shore. This is evident by the relative stability of the r, cross-shelf distribution of temperature at longer periods. However on occasion, usually when the flow regime changes from up-to down-coast or vice versa,the lower layer isotherms can make relatively abrupt movements to and from the near shore over periods of a few days. The maximum subtidal cross-shelf rer excursion was on the order 2 to 3 km(1.2 to 1.9 miles)over a period of 2 days.These longer term changes V in the temperature field influence the cross-shelf transport by internal tides and the sea breeze, because they are the background upon which the shorter period excursions operate. For example,when warm water extends to greater depth (August and September), the internal tide is less likely to lead to cold-water y intrusions into the nearshore. r 16 yr V New V .. 53.2. Diurnal and Semidiurnal Transport .. 5.3.2.1. Seabreeze and Diurnal Currents The moored observations of current and temperature exhibit strong diurnal (24 hour period) fluctuations, with a daily temperature minimum observed over the inner shelf in the early hours of the ..r morning.These fluctuations are forced by diurnal winds and influenced by tidal currents.Wind records at coastal airports (e.g., John Wayne Airport) describe a clear diurnal wind cycle, with maximum onshore winds("sea breeze") in the aftemoon(Figure 11).Away from the coast,at mooring HB07,winds over the outer shelf also exhibit a clear diurnal signal. However, alongshore diumal winds are stronger than crass- shore. This regular diurnal wind drives regular diurnal movements of water towards and away from the coast. `r The wind forces the surface water directly and the near-surface currents(uppermost 5 m(16 fl)) follow the wind at the offshore buoy.This causes an onshore movement of near-surface waters in the afternoon.At the same time, there is an associated offshore movement of water at depth,typically between 10 and 30m(33 .r HB07 VV John I V 11 1 Wayne 5 .r 0 Long E �VVBeach —5— .i —10 aI la 19 74 29 3 8 13 18 August ./ Wind Components .r Figure 11. Along-shore(blade line)and on-shore I red line with yellow shading]wind components at the indicated meteorological buoy and airports. Wind components use the oceanographic convention or direction towards. .r v and 98 fl)below the shallow summer thermocline.This pattern results in near shore maximum temperatures in the late afternoon or early evening.At nighttime this flow structure reverses and near-surface water moves offshore while deeper cold waters move onshore, resulting in the observed temperature minimum around dawn. This wind-driven diurnal oscillation thus moves cold sub-thermocline water across the shelf and provides a regular mechanism for transporting plume waters towards the shore.The vertical structure in the .r 17 Fin diumal cross-shore currents is summarized in Figure 12, which shows velocity maxima near-surface and at V depth with a sharp change in phase around 5-10 m(16-33 ft).Over the outer shelf,the wind-driven diurnal \e currents die off well above the seabed. However, in water depths less than about 30 in (98 ft), this wind- driven diurnal circulation interacts with the bottom. eI Transport in both near-surface and deeper layers must go to zero at the shoreline.Thus,over the inner shelf there is a vertical Flux associated with these cross-shore Flows,resulting in upward movement during the night and downward movement during the day. At times when the diurnal wind-forced Fluctuations are in please V with cross-shore internal tidal Fluctuations, the transport of material across the shelf is enhanced. V Diurnal period Current Profiles V Frequency Domain Analysis : 2001/ 7/20: 0 : 84 Days %r Amplitude Phase Differences y 0 2 4 6 8 —200 0 200 V 0 u u V V 5 y o V a 10 � V 3 V v 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 —200 0 200 V 0 I v c U V - V V 20 < m V z V 3 V 40 V V V 60 V C sneer frequency 0.9/04 Bandwidth 0.3195 cpd 54 DOF HB07 Mode No 1 Percentage of Total Variance 79.2 HB06 Mode No 1 Percentage of Total Variance 76.5 V HB03 Mode No 1 Percentage of Total Variance 76.2 HBN2 Mode No 1 Percentage of Total Variance 89.0 11110 Figure 12. Depth profiles of cross IUI and along IV1 shore velocities from a frequency domain EOF analysis of V diurnal period currents for the Indicated moorings. 18 V V v 5.3.2.2. Semidiurnal Currents .. The semidiurnal (12 hour period) tidal currents are composed of two distinct current fields. The individual barotropic tidal constituents have a constant amplitude with time and a uniform velocity with v depth.Within a tidal band such as the semidiumal band the separate semidiurnal tidal constituents M2 and S2 can reinforce or partially nullify each other. This causes the 14.8-day spring/neap cycle that is most clearly seen in sea level records. The individual constituents of the baroclinic, or internal, tidal currents v have amplitudes that vary over periods of days to a week or two. They also have a pronounced shear with depth. Usually, internal tidal currents near the surface and near the bed flow in opposite directions. r.i The tidal currents have strong oscillatory motions which result in little net movement over a tidal cycle. An ellipse(Figure 13)can describe the speed and direction of the tidal currents over a cycle.The strongest v ne IQ nr'ss'Sv .r .i S M2 Barotropic Tide 10 Mz Internal Tides (bottom) AES ¢c SIO m m \.. c � 20 h, HBO3\v .. 30 H6O5\ a�X �HB1O Newport' HBO6 o Canyon � Jm O 07 e is 'o'W 117'55'w a—�M .W. Current Sale WATER DEPTH o x . s e laamv NeNI[el Mlle. , -30om -100 Belhy..11.contour interval 2 m .tgp YI UTMZam It.NA0 B3 63 0 r Figure 13. M2 tidal current ellipses for barotropic and barocllnlc titles at the bed. The strongest tidal curretns flow parallel to the long axis of the ellipse. .r 19 .r v v V currents flow parallel to the long axis of the ellipse.The length of the major axis represents the strength of V the flow.For semidiurnal tides,the currents 3 hours later are weaker and flow parallel to the ellipse's minor V axis. Six hours later, the currents again flow parallel to the long axis of the ellipse, but in the opposite V direction of the previous Flow.Twelve hours later,the currents return to their original direction and speed. V On the outer shelf,barotropic tidal current ellipses are aligned halfway between the along and cross-shelf V directions (Figure 13). Internal tidal current ellipses are aligned approximately perpendicular to the coast. Clearly,each average cross shore tidal current constituent with speeds around 2-3 cm/s(0.74.ft/s),will not V move plume water or suspended effluent material from where it is discharged at the shelf break to the V nearshore.Water is transported onshore by an average flood tide a distance of about 0.4 km,an insignificant V portion of the distance from the outfall to the shore.If all tidal constituents reinforce each other,tidal currents can flow across the shelf with combined speeds of 5-10 cards.Thus water is transported onshore by an average V flood tide 0.9 to 1.5 km(0.6 to 0.9 mile),less than 115 of the distance from the outfall to the shore.When the V tidal currents ebb,the average tidal current will carry the water about the same distance offshore,causing kiwi net movement of suspended material. As one nears the coast, cross-shelf transport by tidal currents is even more limited because bam opic tidal currents flow parallel to shore (Figure 13); only internal tidal V currents can transport water and suspended material toward the coast. `, However, the semidiumal internal tidal currents do not have constant amplitude wet the summer V months. They can be larger or smaller than their average amplitude for periods of days to weeks. It is interesting to note that the times when internal tides are large are not tied to the spring/neap cycle.If daily V wind or other diurnal forcing reinforces one of the two semidiurnal current pulses, the internal tides may also have a pronounced mixed tidal signal.That is,every other tidal current pulse can be noticeably larger V than the preceding pulse. During the summer of 2001, large internal tidal currents appeared at the `, beginning and end of July and in late August. Cross-shore current speeds near the bed at the end of July were larger than 10 cm/s. V V 53.2.3.Cross-Shore Transport Events in Coastal Ocean Currents V Occasionally, diurnal or tidal processes cause large shoreward movements of cold water. The 140C V isotherm is usually found within 30 m(98 ft)of the sea surface. Because it is nearly the same temperature V as water at the top of the plume,one can use this isotherm to estimate cross-shore excursions of this portion V of plume water.The primary shoreward excursions are due to a combination of subtidal,diurnal scebreeze and tidal movements.The diurnal excursion of the 14°C isotherm is at most 3 km (1.6 miles) (Figure 14). V Although this onshore transport is rapid and a significant fraction of the distance from the outfall to the V beach (7 km (4.5 miles)), it is followed by an equally strong offshore transport. While a single diurnal oscillation can transport waters from the top of the plume to and from the mid-shelf regions,no piece of this r" plume water can move onshore in less than 2-3 diurnal cycles(i.e., 2-3 days). Further, any piece of water V from the top of the plume will mix with receiving waters nearshore, resulting in further dilution of any possible plume bacteria carried shoreward by these excursions. V At any one time, a large shoreward movement of cold water along the bed may occur because the seabreeze, diurnal and semidiurnal tidal forcing have the proper phasing to reinforce the cross-shore excursions due to the separate processes alone.The largest series of these events occurred near the end of July.A close examination of one of these strong cross-shore current pulses shows that they can move cool water along the seabed from the shelf break toward the coast(Figure 15).During a 7-hour period(slightly V more than half a semidiutnal tidal cycle) in the late night and early morning hours, 120C water (which represents the core of the effluent plume) migrated about 4 km across the shelf, from 40 no (131 ft) water V depths to about 15 m(49 ft).Simultaneously,warm surface waters were displaced offshore.About 6 hours V 20 V V V v Y V later,the cool water moved back offshore and the warm surface waters returned.This pattern repeated itself �. for several days. It should be noted that water and suspended materials near the shelf break were transported along, as .r well as across,the shelf.The alongshore currents in this pulse had speeds of 10-30 coots. Hence,water and suspended materials from the shelf break were displaced up or down coast as they moved toward or away from the beach. .r to-WM H807 ..r i 541MNN, .r � IPA I V� .. I • � . .n 1I II -10- �r 59.0; Sea level HB07 58.59 I Iil IIIII I � liliIIII 58 p 1 r l . I I I 57.5 57.0 1 III 56.5. III II i lit II 56.0 -1 j Distance Offshore that Iwthemis Intersect the Bad(relative to shoreline) .Ir 0 — W 1 n1np B°C E 3 I 'Y 16°C — )9y 14°C B I'1Y 7 �nr 29 4 9 I< 19 21 29 3 B 13 IB 23 28 ..r Figure 14. Depth profiles of cross IUI and along M shore velocities from a frequency domain EOF analysis of diurnal period currents for the indicated moorings. 5.33. Nearshore Cross-Shore Transport As one approaches the shoreline, the strength of cross-shore transport weakens,primarily because it is .r not possible to move water through this coastal boundary. Bammopic tides (e.g., Figure 13) and wind- driven currents are directed parallel to the shoreline and transport in the cross-shore direction is weak or absent. Off Huntington Beach, there are two primary routes that may allow the ready transport of cold plume waters through the nearshore into the surfzone: r • Stratified shoreward intrusion of cold water from the nearshore region; .. • Entrainment of plume water by the power plant,with discharge as a nearshore thermal plume. .r Cold water intrusions into the nearshore The constraint of the coastal boundary is mitigated where there is stratification. Cross-shore currents •r can persist closer to the shoreline, as it is possible for near-surface water to be flowing in one direction .I� while near-bottom water flows in the opposite direction (with no net transport into the coast).Thus, cold 21 V V V V Temperature contour('C) V 0 20 19 V 10 8 20 14 �- 7 _ 16 y. 15 0 hr 30 ,4 40 24-Jul-2001 , ... „ ,. ,. . . r-12 `- 12 •► 50 10 v HBOj, H 03 H6,05.-. HB06 07 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Distance from shoreline(km) 0 Temperature contour(C) 20 19 �. 10 8 20 6 Vr 15 7 hr 30 . 14 3 40 12 r 1 50 10 60 07 9 0 1 2 3 4 8 7 8( y Distance from shoreline(km) Temperature contour(°C) rn 0 20 19 .r 10 18 17 20 6 15 13 hr 30 14 �+ 3 40 12 11 V 50 10 07 g V 600 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 V Distance from shoreline(km) V V Figure 15.Temperature profiles for the rising, peak and falling portion of a cold pulse event on July 24. V 22 V ♦r V V v water present at 15 an (49 ft) water depth may surge into the shallow nearshore and surfzone, as observed .� in water depths of 2.5 m (8 ft)and less(Figure 16). Low temperatures persist for a few hours before these cool waters are replaced again by the warmer surface waters. While these cold-water intrusion events can be due to many processes, including internal tides, the 24-hr diurnal period dominates the nearshom record. The specific form and penetration of the cold-water intrusion into the nearshore depends on the .r nature of the forcing and on ambient stratification,but many events evolve into internal bores.These bores intrude into the nearshore as a marked thermal front and with a propagation speed of 5-10 cm/s(taking an hour or two to move from 5 an (16 ft) water depth into the surfzone). On occasion, these intrusions move right into the surfzone, resulting in surfzone temperature drops of up to 30C in an hour (Figure 16). However, the coldest water observed in the surfzone during August and September is 17.50C, well above v.i the 140C temperature taken as an indicator of the possible presence of plume waters. V 25 Near-surface .. 20 l 1 .. m 15 18 23 28 2 7 12 17 Aug Sep 2001 v/ 25 Near-bottom .r avV � ,�zo E E V I 1 d 5 18 23 28 2 7 12 17 Aug Sep 2001 .i Figure 16. Temporal variations in near-surface and near-bottom temperatures at mooring HB03(15m blue), HBN2 (10m,turquoise),T5(25m,yellow),ST2(2.5m, red),and ST6(0.5m,green). `r 23 `I �r V V V AES power plant V Lr Due to its location,the AES power plant has been suspected of directly contributing to the contamination V of the beach between 3N and 9N.The power plant pumps in cooling water at 8.4 m(27 ft)water depth and then discharges heated water at 6.5 m(21 ft)water depth.Three potential roles have been identified. V a.Thermal stratification could enhance cold-water intrusions into the nearshore: During the period of V plant operation in late summer (including both reduced cooling water flows in July-August and V stronger Flows in September-October), there is no evidence of a difference in the currents at 10 m b' offshore of the power plant and at a comparable 10 m location 2 km (1.2 miles) further upcoast. Further, the calculated heat load and observed thermal plume stratification are not sufficient to V significantly alter the stratification and cold-water intrusions dynamics. kwl b. Pumping of cooling water through the power plant enhances shoreward transport of bottom water from V 8.4 m(27 ft)water depth:As is evident in Figure 16,colder water reaches the depth of the power plant V intake and discharge(see thermistor at 7.5 m(25 ft) water depth) more often than it intrudes into the `, surfzone(see thermistors at 2.5 m(8 ft)and 0.5 m(1.6 ft)water depths).Once entrained by the intake or discharge jet,this potentially contaminated cold water forms part of the surface thermal plume that V is observed nearshore and can be expected to move into the surfzone through buoyant spreading or V under the action of afternoon winds and other ambient processes. Surfzone temperature observations V showed limited effects of the thermal plume, indicating that these waters had been well mixed before impacting the beach (dilutions of at least 10-fold). While the power plant was not operating in early V summer,the observation of beach contamination events during that time period indicates that the power V plant does not play an essential role in beach contamination. V c.The power plant may act as a source or conduit for bacteria moving from land to ocean.The role of V the power plant in beach contamination is presently the subject of a California Energy Commission study, aiming to assess this question through extensive sampling of bacteria concentrations in the I+' plant during 2002.The possible role of the plant in the transport of wastewater to the beach is being V assessed through concurrent sampling of intake water temperatures, salinity, ammonia and fecal V bacteria concentrations. V 53A. Sediment Resuspension �ftd Hourly data of wave heights,wave periods and near-bed current velocities measured at site HB07,about V I mile west of the outfall diffuser in 60 m of water, are used to calculate bed shear stress for the summer V of 2001 (Figure 17).The estimated bed shear stress intermittently surpassed the critical shear stress of 0.5 `, dynelem'(Gardner, 1989)and caused resuspension of the fine material(very fine sands and silts)from the V bed. Some estimated amplitudes were occasionally higher than a more conservative critical value of 1.0 dyne/cm', (Maa et al., 1993). Both water clarity data and video footage taken during two such events in V June and July confirmed the occurrences of resuspension and therefore the validity of the estimated values 4, of bed shear stress. law Whether the resuspended sediments can be brought to the nearshore and then to the surfzone depends �fto on the flows on the shelf. During the three events when beach contamination and bed resuspension coincide(Figure 17),the flows at all three stations across the shelf were generally along-shore.Therefore, most suspended material near the outfall would have been transported up- or down-coast along the shelf V break, not across the shelf to the beach or surfzone. V 'V V 24 V V V V v v L' 2 Transmissometer al HBO],4a cm above pad Video 1 Higher concentration of wspended panicles in water column,but most we, € features on the bosom ere not sanded! Video2 High concentration of suspended 'es, f•-V , .yq(p�fi t particles,some features on the bottom 0.5 have been changed oe - v y 2 ..y 2 r 1.5 N E c t. 0 •/ 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 ` 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 4 11 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 2001 rr Figure 17. Time-series of water clarity(top panel)and estimated bedshear stress(bottom panel).The transmissometer was fouled after early August.The vertical bands in the bottom panel designate the beach contamination events.Shear stress values within or above the horizontal band are able to resuspend vary fine sands and silts. ees, 6. COASTAL TRANSPORT PROCESSES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO .� SIGNIFICANT SURFZONE BACTERIAL PATTERNS ..� The temporal relationships between the three categories of surfzone bacterial exceedance events defined earlier (section 5.1.2) and the various coastal oceanographic processes were used to determine the probability that significant levels of bacteria from the outfall were transported to the beach. .r 6.1. Subtidal Cross-Shelf Transport, Newport Canyon e.y Occasionally,the along-isobath subtidal currents in the near shore region flow in the opposite direction to currents over the middle and outer shelf.This provides a current regime in which plume material could .� be transported downcoast towards the Newport Canyon and then transported up coast by the reversed v nearshore currents.Because this plume water is relatively close to shore,other coastal ocean processes may carry this water to local beaches. vI .i In order to address this possibility, a transport pathway through Newport Canyon was postulated. The pathway assumed downcoast currents always hug the shelf edge and transport water and suspended v v `e 25 .ra v �r materials toward the canyon (Figure 18), if the downcoast flow is persistent, water from near the outfall y can reach the canyon. We hypothesized that canyon upwelling will then transport this subsurface plume r' water onto the adjacent shelf. If upcoast flows exist at that time, this plume water will then be transported y to the nearshore water off Huntington Beach. The possibly contaminated water will continue to remain 1/ 1181OW 117"SSW y hypothetical V ? plume water z WATER DEPTH $ law m *direction of 300 in V current flow 200 y o >y , -100 C[ 62 m 0 AES Q 66 � m �► 0M tap HB03 to v %0 30 V 13 \Q • Ne vpo f' -- v anyon z 62 62 m - oo HB07 HB11 m %0 118 a Kilometers 117'S5'W i 0 1 2 3 1 0 Nautical Milels 2 rr Outfall to Newport Canyon to Shoreline Shoreline Newport.. you Santa Ana River Ezceedances Exceeddyces ,y (times 4tmes 1 3 Figure 18. Hypothetical transport of effluent plume through Newport Canyon and table of related events. `. 26 er �r v v offshore of Huntington Beach as long as the transport pathway remains intact. Various nearshore, cross- shore transport processes could bring the bacteria to the beach.This is a very idealized pathway that favors transport of plume material through Newport Canyon.It ignores the fact that the plume often exits the shelf in the downcoast direction and moves into much deeper water. It also ignores the possibility that canyon upwelling may not exist when the pathway is in existence. We assessed the currents along the pathway and found that water from near the outfall could have reached Newport Canyon 7 times during the summer of 2001 (Figure 18).The nearshore upcoast flow was persistent enough in 4 of these events that plume water could have been carried to Huntington Beach. During the postulated time windows when the plume water would have been offshore of Huntington Beach, only one surfzone measurement was above the AB411 standards. Broadening the window by one ,.r day on each side yielded two more possible contamination days. However,these events,which occurred on the first day of an expanded window,were at the end of an earlier 3 day beach contamination event. Hence it is unlikely they were associated with the Newport Canyon pathway. The potential for transport through Newport Canyon did not commonly occur in the summer of 2001. The pathway was only open for 7-13%of the days in the study period for the actual and expanded windows, respectively.The actual and expanded windows were associated with only 1 to 3 of the 42 days when either v a Type 1-3 contamination event occurred during the study period from June to October 2001. v 6.2.Diurnal and Semidiurnal Transport Pathways v As individual mechanisms,the diurnal wind-driven and barotropic tidal oscillations can move cold sub- ,� thermocline water toward the shore, although the distance of the excursions is relatively small. The excursion of these motions separately is insufficient to move plume water into the nearshore in less than two days, unless assisted by some other transport mechanism. Furthermore, the portion of plume water most likely to be transported by the diurnal seabreeze mechanisms is from the top of the plume,which has much smaller bacterial concentrations than the core of the plume. Any piece of plume water transported by these mechanisms will mix with the receiving water nearshore,resulting in further dilution of bacterial concentrations. Historically,the beaches are most likely to be contaminated by bacteria during spring tides. It is not likely that this contamination is predominately caused by cross-shelf transport of the outfall plume by large internal tides.The strongest internal tides did not tend to occur during spring tides over the 4-month study period. 6.3.Coastal Ocean Event Transport Pathways Even though average diurnal and semidiumal currents separately may not bring the plume to shore, these processes may reinforce each other and carry the outfall plume toward the beach.The largest cold- water pulses,forced by a combination of diurnal and semidiumal processes,occurred near the end of July v 2001;these excursions were still less than 4 km(half the distance from the outfall to shore). In an effort to relate the appearance of these cold events to the occurrence of bacterial concentrations exceeding AB411 standards at the beach,a time series of cool,near-shore events was constructed(Figure 19).A cool event was defined to be when the energetic cross-shore current pulses brought water colder than 120C into 30 to(98 ft)water depth or colder than 130C into 15 to(49 ft).A cool event was also defined as when the nearshore temperature was as cold as or colder than the temperature at the top of the offshore effluent plume, irrespective of a transport pathway. The July 23-26 cooling events, as judged by both of these criteria,were the largest cooling events in the summer of 2001. v v 27 v w .. 41 �I �I Temperature time series at HB01 y zz r— — I — 1m V 20 — 10.5m T-plume top Orr v16 v 5 �16 v d t 74 1 I err ~12 oG/I29 07/09, 07�2q7�9 08105 , 09/2610I/g3 I y R115 06/29 07113 07/27 08110 oei24 09/07 09121 1ao *4" hom y Temperature time series at HB03 \,r` zz *�_� Um V 20g6 tit.I V m16 v �16 V E14 v ~12 � I I 1oo O§i 07/09, 07/2297/29 08105 , 09f2610/g3 10/11 rs/ 06115 06129 07113 07/27 08110 08124 09107 090 10105 Date 2001 (UT) Figure 19. Nearshore surface and bottom temperatures and the 2-week average of temperature at the top of the offshore effluent plume computed from a plume model. Note that there are several instances when the bottom temperatures are similar to those at the top of the plume. The series of cool events was compared to the dates when Types I,2 and/or 3 contamination events were %/ found along the local beaches. Most of the nearshore cooling events did not coincide with contamination r, events (Figure 20). Only 2 of the 17 cooling events occurred on days when AB411 standards were exceeded in the surfzone in the 3N-12N region. Most of the large cooling events at the end of July 14/ happened after a nearly week-long period of beach contamination. V111 6.4. Sediment Transport Pathways r Sediment transport was one of the hypothesized mechanisms that could bring fine particles that may y have outfall bacteria sorbed onto them to the beach. However, there is no apparent correlation between y resuspension and beach contamination events(Figure 17).The current Flows during the few periods when beach contamination events did coincide with high estimated shear stress could not carry this material to 1000 shore. 6.5. Nearshore Transport Pathways %r Water temperature in the surfzone was used to diagnose transport pathways associated with high y bacteria events. If any routes for transporting sub-thermocline (and thus potentially wastewater plume) waters through the nearshore, either natural or associated with AES, were a primary cause of beach contamination events, then one would expect an association of contamination events with specific water !r 28 111100 .w temperatures. If cold-water intrusions mediated contamination events,then one would expect high bacteria ar counts to be associated with colder waters.Alternatively,if the power plant mediated contamination events, ..i then one would expect high bacteria counts to be associated with warmer waters. None of these associations is apparent in the data.The results of the 2002 study of bacteria in the AES plant intake and discharge are awaited to better resolve the viability of that transport pathway. .r W Cooling t s Bcuch contumivalion typcs b ypc . Typal e 12 dcg inrbor<of la to depth . Type 2 �/ ♦IIB01 romp.<max.plume rump. . Type I sntl Type 2 ..r •both above - 3ym a Cruises ..a Cooling uI Nearshore W Bacteria samples 2 vn s o r 2 E V 1.2 07101A1 08N1A1 09'01Af 10/131b1 a PST .� Figure 20. Days on which bacterial events occur(vertical bars: blue=type 1, magenta=type 2, red=types 1 and 2, gold=type 3)are shown together with cruise days(black bars);and occurrence of cold water nearshore(red= 12 deg C inshore of 30m, blue=11801 temperature<maximum plume temperature,green=both). Black dots in row 3 .r indicate whether bacterial samples were taken that day. The day's higher high water as measured at Los Angeles is shown at the bottom. v./ .r 7. CONCLUSIONS .n Although the study identifies several possible coastal ocean pathways by which diluted wastewater may be transported to the beach, including internal tide, sea breeze, subtidal flow features and anthropogenic ..i features such as the AES cooling system, there were no direct observations of either the high bacteria ,r concentrations seen in the OCSD plume at the shelf break reaching the shoreline in significant levels or of an association between the existence of a coastal ocean process and beach contamination at or above AB411 levels. The only physical variables clearly identified as being related to surfzone contamination W were phase of the lunar cycle, with high values of all three fecal indicator bacteria found preferentially at ..r spring tides; time of day, with high values found at night—particularly for Enters i; and phase of the tide, with high values found near low tide — particularly for total and fecal coliform bacteria. It is concluded that the OCSD plume is not a major cause of beach contamination; no causal links could be .i demonstrated.This conclusion is based on the absence of direct observation of links between bacteria in the outfall plume and beach contamination, on analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of shoreline contamination and coastal ocean processes,and on the observation of higher levels of contamination at the beach than in the plume. 29 .y V v 8. REFERENCES V V Gardner,W.D., 1989. Periodic resuspension in Baltimore Canyon by focusing of internal waves. IGR, V 94, 18185-18194 V Grant, S.,C.Webb,B. Sanders,A.Boehm,L Kim,J. Redman,A. Chu, R. Mrse,S.Jiang,N. Gardiner,and A. Brown,2000. Huntington Beach Water Quality Investigation Phase II:An tfto Analysis of Ocean,Surf Zone,Watershed,Sediment and Groundwater Data Collected from June V 1998 through September 2000.Final Report. 1100 Orange County Sanitation District, 1999.Huntington Beach Closure Report,Phase I final report. tad Maa,J.R-Y.,L.D.Wright,C.-H. Lee,and T.W.Shannon, 1993.VEMS sea carousel: a field instrument V for studying sediment transport. Marine Geologg 115,271-287. V MEC(MEC Analytical Systems,Inc),2000. Huntington Beach Closure: Relationships Between High V✓ Counts of Bacteria on Huntington Beaches and Potential Sources. Final Report to Orange V County Sanitation District.January 2000. 13 pages plus tables and figures. V NEC(MEC Analytical Systems, Inc),2001. Strategic Process Study,Plume Tracking. June 1999 to y September 2000. Final Report,Volume I—Executive Summary. V SAIC and MEC, 1991. Proposed Elimination of Selected Water Quality Parameters,Total Suspended %ad Solids and Oil and Grease,and Reduction in Sampling Effort for Other Parameters From the Orange County Offshore Water Quality Monitoring Program. Final Report to Orange County V Sanitation District. 12 pages plus appendices. Iwo V V Acknowledgement V The authors would like to thank Jon Warrick fm reviewing the report,and Lori Hibbeler for creating the HTML file. V The on-line version of this report is at: hap://gcopubs.w .mgs.gm/open-filetofD3-621 V ivo V V Y. V v v V V V V 30 V V V V