Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2003-03-26
6 March 19, 2003 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ^ains NOTICE OF MEETING 2411:014188 g fax: 1714)ammoo2U35B w BOARD OF DIRECTORS ww.awE.nm m.111na.am..°: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PG Bo.8127 rt ""I1valley.27 CA WEDNESDAY, March 26, 2003 — 7:00 P.M. 9272]2B-8 ,correct add.: 1 DB44 Ellis Avenue Pouncein valley,CA 9270E-7018 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue M,cmtar Fountain Valle California 92708 Aa...In Y' al Clues The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim Brae Buena Perk Cypress Fountain valley F.Ilwmn G.Men crave B rd SaCf� Huntington Reach ( ry Le Habram lrone L.Palm. Los Alamitos Newport Beech Orenga Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings P San n.a Ans An. Seel Beech STanwn T1.cn OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesda Aril 2,2003 at 5:00 p.m. villa Park y' P MorEe une. Caunev of orange PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday,April 3,2003 at 5:00 p.m. FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday,April 9,2003 at 5:00 p.m. Sanitary Districts Costs M.S. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Mousey city SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday,April 14,2003 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD Water Districts STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,April 23,2003 at 5:00 p.m. Irvine Ranch To maintain world,use leadership in wastewater and water resource management. no BOARD MEETING DATES Board Meetina April 23, 2003 May 28, 2003 June 25, 2003 July 23, 2003 August 27, 2003 September 24, 2003 October 22, 2003 'November 19, 2003 'December 17, 2003 January 28, 2004 February 25, 2004 March 24, 2004 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month G:wp.db%admnSSNpeMa12W3 Me ng NodoeMN32.dw ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: March 26. 2003 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... �_ — (WILSON) ........................ BANKHEAD................... (MILLER).......................... BRADY ........................�L (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ...................�L — (AMBRIZ).......................... CAVECCHE................... �� — (GARCIA)......................... CHRISTY..................... (CRANDALL).................... COLLINS ......................�G — (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE..............�L — (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE.....................�L (WILSON)........................ DUVALL...................... _ /�— (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. � — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN...................�L (POE)................................ JEMPSA...................... 1L — So& 3 (DAVERT).......................�.............. �L (SHEA) ............................. KROM........................ (BROADWATER)............. LEYES.......................... � a�esc •SdGP�609/�, 5�2v� (DOW).............................. MARSHALL.................. S/D 92 f/o36 (HERNANDEZ)................. MC CRACKEN...............i (FRESCHI) ....................... MC GOWAN ................._A" — (BEAUMAN) ..................... MOORE........................�L — (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER..............�L (KEENAN)........................ PIERCY........................i (WEBB) ............................ RIDGEWAY................... — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... �L — (HERMAN)........................ WALKER....................... — Anderson Beekman r ( , Ghirelli Ke ✓ Ludwin Mathews ✓ Miles Ooten Tomko Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Nixon ✓ A. `��" +u""Y."_ 02/26/03 G.IwpdhlMmin\BSXDIRECTORNDirectors Roll CaY.dx REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Z6 Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (' - M � 5 4 yz 6 2-. 7 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: dif)-5�ei REPRESENTING: .&I/WL"45 Ir-ay�l �� ` I rr-5�"c-�4s>L r-a�cc (self/name of or ani lion) SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ate aa�3 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM lease print lease tint n - CS Ili R(WPrQbj6Akbi0 boVLE H:1WP.DTAWDMINISS\FORMS\SIGN-IN FORM.DOC BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeedngDa� To ad.oror. 3/26/a AGENDA REPORT Item Numbp Item Numbe 8 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Govemment Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District. For the specks of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. SUMMARY See attached listing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 02/01/03—02/15/03 and 02/16/03—02/28/03 ��� � V� o � o Q G �1 � � • - � (J J N N � � p `� � � � �� b�� F W NO. 2OF3 CHAIR'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF MARCH 26, 2003 1 . THE MEETING SCHEDULE FOR THE NEXT MONTH SHOWS: A. WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2ND, OMTS COMMITTEE B. THURSDAY, APRIL 3RD, PDC COMMITTEE C. WEDNESDAY, APRIL 9T", FAHR COMMITTEE 0-4 D. WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16T", SPECIAL DIRECTORS 7 . WORKSHOP TO REVIEW THE RESULTS OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS CIP VALIDATION REPORT E. AND THE BOARD AND STEERING COMMITTEE MEETINGS ARE ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23Ro 2. THERE WILL BE A SPECIAL DISCUSSION ITEM ON ASSET MANAGEMENT AT THE APRIL 2ND OMTS COMMITTEE MEETING. I WOULD LIKE TO FORMALLY INVITE ALL DIRECTORS TO ATTEND. THIS IS A PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT ISSUE WORTHY OF YOUR ATTENTION. ASSET MANAGEMENT IS AN ORGANIZING PRINCIPLE FOR IMPROVING THE LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT OF THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF EXISTING AND NEW FACILITIES WE HAVE HERE AT THE DISTRICT. THE POTENTIAL SAVINGS ARE IMPRESSIVE-BUT THE INITIAL COSTS ARE, TOO. THAT'S WHY THE OMTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF ARE TAKING PARTICULAR CARE IN REVIEWING THIS PROGRAM PRIOR TO MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE FULL BOARD. 3. STAFF HAS PROPOSED A SPECIAL WORKSHOP FOR WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16 AT L< `J P.M. TO PRESENT THE REVISED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT FACILITIES. THIS WORKSHOP IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT WILL HELP THE BOARD TO DISCUSS THE ALL-IMPORTANT TIME SCHEDULE THAT WILL BE PROPOSED TO THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD AND EPA LATER THIS YEAR. v NO. 3OF3 REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, MARCH 26, 2003, AT 5 P.M. THE MINUTES WERE REVIEWED AND APPROVED. 1 . I REPORTED ON THE PROGRESS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY AD HOC COMMITTEE. WE CONTINUE TO MEET WEEKLY TO ADVISE STAFF AND OUR CONSULTANTS ON THE SACRAMENTO AND WASHINGTON DC INITIATIVES WE ARE PURSUING. 2. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. BLAKE REPORTED ON THE PROGRESS WE ARE MAKING TOWARDS ACHIEVING 30/30 SECONDARY TREATMENT STANDARDS. B. HE ALSO REPORTED ON OUR CONTINUING SUCCESS WITH DISINFECTING OUR EFFLUENT. OUR BACTERIAL NUMBERS AT THE OUTFALL CONTINUE TO ACHIEVE THE STATE'S AB411 STANDARDS. C. SO FAR, SPECIAL DISTRICTS ARE NOT BEING DISCUSSED AS PART OF THE SOLUTION TO THE STATE BUDGET CRISIS. WE WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THIS. D.- AS I HAVE ALREADY ANNOUNCED, STAFF HAS ASKED THAT WE HOLD A DIRECTORS' WORKSHOP ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16. THIS WILL BE DEDICATED TO A DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT THAT WILL BE USED AS THE BASIS FOR NEGOTIATING OUR OCEAN PERMIT TERMS AND CONDITIONS WITH EPA AND THE REGIONAL BOARD. E. THE ANNUAL ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS COUNCIL DINNER IS APRIL 17 AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DISTRICT WILL BE INVITED TO ATTEND. F. THERE WILL BE A SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON OCEAN ENVIROMENTAL AND MONITORING ISSUES AT APRIL 23 BOARD MEETING. BLAKE ANNOUNCED THAT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING WILL INCLUDE A LENGTHY PRESENTATION ON MATTERS RELATED TO THE OCEAN ENVIRONMENT, INCLUDING A REPORT ON THE 2001 HUNTINGTON BEACH STUDIES, OUR RECENT VIDEO TAPING OF THE ECOSYSTEM AT THE END OF THE OUTFALL; AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF LAST YEAR'S OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM. G. AND, AS YOU HAVE ALREADY SEEN TONIGHT, THE GENERAL MANAGER PLANS TO PRESENT SPECIAL REPORTS TO THE DIRECTORS FROM TIME TO TIME THAT WILL HIGHLIGHT MISCELLANEOUS SUBJECTS OF INTEREST. 3. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL 4. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A: STATUS OF NPDES PERMIT RENEWAL AND NEGOTIATION PROCESS BOB GHIRELLI UPDATED THE STEERING COMMITTEE ON STAFF ACTIVITIES NOW THAT THE CIP VALIDATION REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND WHAT WILL BE HAPPENING IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. B. GARY STREED REPORTED ON THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ON A POLICY FOR PROPERTIES THAT ABANDON SEPTIC TANKS AND CONNECT TO SANITARY SEWERS. THE STEERING COMMITTEE DIRECTED STAFF TO DEVELOP / NOT DEVELOP OFFSETS AND INCENTIVES TO REDUCE THE COSTS THAT PROPERTY OWNERS FACE IN ABANDONING THEIR SEPTIC TANKS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BENEFITS TO THE SERVICE AREA. THE COMMITTEE DIRECTED STAFF TO FORWARD THE RECOMMENDATION TO THE FAHR COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION. C. THE AGENDA ITEMS SCHEDULED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE WORKING COMMITTEES IN APRIL WERE REVIEWED. D. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS WERE MADE ON ITEMS ON TONIGHT'S BOARD MEETING AGENDA. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING March 26, 2003—7:00 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Aoencv Active Director Alternate Director Board of Supervisors Jim Silva Chuck Smith G9wpAtll genda\Board Agendas12003 Board AgendasN032603 supplemenW.do , 1 Q u yp ' E March 26, 2003 MEMORANDDM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress Data on the level of treatment progress and its impacts on the final effluent are attached. Historical trends for final effluent percent of secondary treatment for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids are shown. In addition, current data for the month's BOD, suspended solids and disinfection effectiveness is shown on a schematic of the treatment system. The Operations division has all of the operationally available secondary treatment facilities online. The Operations divisions continue to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. The final effluent is a blend of 68% secondary treatment and 32% primary treatment, which surpasses our target of 64% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During March 2003, R averaged 37 ppm TSS and 59 ppm BOD. The secondary treatment goal is 30/30 ppm BOD and TSS. The final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility's disinfection system, which has been in operation for seven months. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliforn, fecal coliform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. March 2003 results for total coliforn averaged about 2,100 MPN/100 ml down from an average bacteria level in the final effluent of 25,000,000 MPN/100 ml prior to disinfection. The final effluent had a maximum 0.12 ppm chlorine residual averaged over six hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm compliance limit. Up to date daily and 30-day average bacteria data is reported on the Web www.ocsd.00m. The Board approved the permanent bleach/dechlorination (dechlor) facilities in January 2003 and construction will be completed in the fall of 2003. The permanent bleach and dechlorination facilities will be used until Engineering determines the future technology that will be used for disinfection and designs and constructs the new facilities. RJO:pjm G:Nvp.dt81cm1810T1NAL%RJ01B0ARD LeftmW--121802 Board Packet Cover Letter.doc Attachments (2) Ccso • P.O.aus121 • Po .wnva6ry,CA 92r28.8127 • (714)9623411 Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Revision 3126/03 Final Effluent lox Percent Secondary Treatment 67% Winter 2002 Goat=64X 66% Monthly Average e 67%6698 ux w 66% s7 6e% sa 9x v; t pN �A� g .t�/� ISn k 4 Mat Ao11 1 f m Aar sro oe Naa oac Jm File Mr AM M4 Jun Jul Aug sap Od Now two Jan Fee met 2002 2003 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 1w in Final Effluent oPn in Final Effluent 1m 1m 1990 Permit Limit=IUU plan p ... .... ...... . .. . .......... ..._ __. _ W __.___._..... ..........._._ p ........ .... . . ......... m ..... .... ...... .........._._. .......... ._._. ---_.,, m . . .......f46............ ........... .7.0..._.7.2 To 71 as 7a Y ._... 70 196 PelmentUmit=60 ppm _... ._.....Go ro 6a .......... Wm m ...... M_r....10...�!.._u...49...N °° .,o....p...................._____.... m .__........................................................ .......... ..................... do .._................. a ............ ..........................._.............................................................. b m ee Secondary Standard anal=30 pion Secondary Standard anal=30 point 1e ... __.._ _. _.__ _._........I.... . . ... .. .. .... 19 .._ .. _ . . ._ Sry On Nov nec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sala Oy Ip pK JN /Y IW So an Now Ox Jan FeE Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aue Sep ON Now Oec Jan Fee Mile Mal M02 lase mm 2002 2003 Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Last Fiscal Year 2001-02 Progress to Secondary Standards Ending June 2002 Month: March 2003 47% ! 32% Advanced Ocean Pipeline Primary Ocean Pipeline M..Zwaie� Main a Mixed Mixetl Main OrI'on 't 53% 68% 2.' Seconds Final Effluent: Secondary Bacteria Reduction: 99.99 Goal: 99.7% Reduction TSS = St ppm Chlorine Level Ocean Discharge Daily Maximum: 0.24 mglL Permit Limit: Permit Limit—Daily Maximum 1.45 mglL BOD = 100 ppm (Average of Eight Samples) TSS = 60 ppm Final Effluent: Final Effluent Goal: BOD= 59 ppm BOD = 30 ppm TSS = 37 ppm TSS = 30 ppm BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 108" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING March 26, 2003—7:00 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/AGencv Active Director Alternate Director Board of Supervisors Jim Silva Chuck Smith G:\wp.dMagenda� rd Agenda V003 Board Agendas\032W3 supplemenWAm STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held onr a C4, , 2003, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 2003. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this -Wtl� day of /L,' 2003. Penny M. Kyle, Secretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District GAWR.DTMADMIMMFORMS AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT March 19, 2003 Phase: (714)962-2411 To the Chair and Members mellbq addreu: of the Board of Directors P.O.sox 8127 Fountain Valle,CA 92728-8127 Subject: Board Letter street address: 108"Elis Avenue Pountsn valley.CA The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 92708-7018 information on any of the items, please call me. OCSD Directors Hit the HIM W.1mor Directors Christy, McCracken and Silva visited the Orange County congressional A....its delegation during their recent trips to Washington, DC. With the help of our • legislative advocates, Eric Sapirstein and John Freshman, one or more of them cities visited the offices of Representatives Dana Rohrabacher, Gary Miller, Loretta An.h.im Sanchez, Ed Royce, Chris Cox and Senators Feinstein and Boxer. In each of the Bra. meetings she attended, Chair McCracken reviewed the status of the District's effort to Buena Park reach agreement with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency officials on a new Clean Cyproea Water Act permit. She expressed the District's gratitude for the help In securing Fountain Valley P P 9 P � 9 Fullerton legislative language supporting this effort without the interference of frivolous careen croaa Huntington Beach litigation or penalties. Irvine Le He&. One of the Sanitation District's key message points is the multiple benefits to the La Palma Las,Alamiroa region of the decision to move toward secondary treatment standards. These Newport Beach benefits are improving the quality of the coastal waters, increasing the availability of Drente Placenti reclaimable secondary effluent for use by the Ground Water Replenishment System, a Santa Ana and extending the life of the existing ouffall. Based on feedback received from Seal Baton congressional staff, these appeared to be convincing arguments for the decision to Brenton con 9 PP 9 Tbatin proceed to secondary treatment levels. Villa Park Yarba Linde As a result of these meetings, it appears the delegation staff supports the District's County of Orange request for federal funding assistance. These staff indicated that the approach appeared reasonable and the rationale for federal assistance sound. Congressional Sanitary Districts taff noted that they would review the information provided and work with the District in Coate Mo. the coming months as Congress considers EPA spending priorities for fiscal year Midway City 2004. water Districts Irene Panch Disinfection Update The final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility's disinfection system, which has been in operation for seven months. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. February 2003 results for total coliform averaged about 2,000 MPN/100 mI down from an average bacteria level in the final effluent of 'To Protect Me Public Health and the Environment through Excellence in Wastewater Slaloms' Board of Directors Page 2 March 19, 2003 25,000,000 MPN/100 ml prior to disinfection. The final effluent had a maximum 0.12 ppm chlorine residual averaged over six hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm compliance limit. Up-to-date daily and 30-day average bacteria data is reported on the Web at www.ocsd.com. The Board approved the upgraded bleach/dechlorination (dechlor) facilities in January 2003 and construction will be completed in the fall of 2003. These bleach and dechlorination facilities will be used until we determine the long-term technology that will be used for disinfection and then design and construct the new facilities. Secondary Treatment Standards Update We have all of the operationally available secondary treatment facilities online. We continue to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. The final effluent is a blend of 65% secondary treatment and 35%primary treatment, which surpasses our target of 64% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During February 2003, it averaged 36 ppm TSS and 55 ppm BOD. The secondary treatment goal is 30/30 ppm BOD and TSS. Rein Storm Peek Flow On Saturday, March 15, 2003, we experienced high wastewater flow caused by the rain. Our normal Saturday peak flow is about 300 mgd. On Saturday, the flow peaked at 430 mgd. The outfall design flow capacity is 480 mgd at high tide. The Saturday peak flow occurred at low tide which means the outfall has more capacity. The District's staff has emergency procedures to use for very high system flows and is trained annually in the use of the procedures. The flow experienced on Saturday was close to triggering our placing the Emergency Operation Center into operation to oversee the high flow situation; however, it wasn't necessary. Industrial Wastewater Operator Training In early March the Source Control division completed the fourth offering of our Industrial Wastewater Operator Training Course. We started this program because we saw the need to do so. There are very few programs like this in the nation. The seven-week course consisted of seven 3.5-hour classes, quizzes, and a final exam, and is taught by consultants hired by the District. Forty industrial wastewater operators from 30 Class I facilities throughout Orange County participated in the program. Based on attendance and testing scores, 32 operators passed the course and received certificates of completion. This hands-on training course is designed to help industries achieve consistent compliance with their sewer discharge permits by training their wastewater operators to properly operate and maintain their wastewater pretreatment systems and understand permit requirements. We first targeted those plating companies with the worst compliance records. Board of Directors Page 3 March 19, 2003 Our evaluation of the 77 companies that have previously participated in the training program indicates that their permit compliance rate increased from 25 percent before training to 74 percent after training. The Source Control division will continue to offer refresher courses focusing on hands-on demonstrations, testing procedures, flow meter operation, and record keeping. District staff will continue to provide technical assistance through follow-up audits to help industries with compliance problems to get back into compliance. California CEO Magazine Lists Best Cities for Business There are more than 400 cities in the Golden State, but only 25 made the list of the Best Cities for Business. Only one Orange County city, La Habra, made the cut. California is the most dynamic state in the nation, with nearly 35 million residents, and the state's economy is the fifth largest in the world. California CEO serves the state's business community. While evaluating hundreds of cities in all regions of the state, they took a look at many factors, including crime statistics, housing costs, labor availability,cost-of-living indexes, Chamber of Commerce reports, interviews with local folks and other community leaders, and economic development reports of new and expanding enterprises. They also personally surveyed literally dozens of cities, performing in-depth analysis of their business conditions. By weighing all the data, California CEO arrived at a ranking that reflects its judgment of which cities,from one through 25 are tops for business: 1. San Diego 14. Poway 2. Sacramento 15. San Jose 3. Riverside 16. .Carson 4. Los Angeles 17. Lancaster 5. Bakersfield 18. Concord 6. Fresno 19. Santa Maria 7. Stockton 20. Merced 8. San Francisco 21. Redding 9. Long Beach 22. San Marcos 10. Oxnard 23. Visalia 11. Temecula 24. Camarillo 12. Chula Vista 25. La Habra 13. Clovis 75�Annual California Water Environment Association (CWEA) Conference I would like to suggest that your city/agency collection system staff attend the 75'" Annual CW EA Conference in Ontario, CA from April 22 - 25 at the Ontario Convention Center. Board of Directors Page 4 March 19, 2003 The conference will feature sewer collection specialty workshops, over 150 technical presentations, 150 exhibits and many other activities. CW EA certificate holders can earn up to 24 training contact hours for attendance at the specialty/technical sessions. Training contact hours are now required for all CW EA technical certificate holders. Of particular interest is the Capacity, Management, Operations & Maintenance (cMOM) Collection Systems Workshop. One of the speakers is Nick Arhontes, OCSD's Collection Facilities 0&M and Facilities Services Divisions' manager. Although the Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) rule that incorporates the cMOM language has not yet been published by EPA headquarters, it is expected to be in the near future. Several EPA regions, state regulatory agencies and proactive utilities in the U.S. have, however, proceeded with various levels of implementation. The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board has done so here. The purpose of this workshop is to provide an update of the cMOM progress at the National, Region 9 and California levels. The workshop will also provide utility case histories of proactive cMOM implementation. Your staff can download the conference brochure and registration form at <http://www.cwea.ora/conferences/2003 AC Brochure.odf> or call the CW EA office at (510) 382-7800 for more information. Pre-registration forms must be postmarked no later that March 24 to get the pre-registration discount. Earth Day, Tuesday, April 22 Earth Day should be every day, but officially the 33rd Annual Earth Day is Tuesday, April 22. Does Earth Day make a difference? I think so. I decided to get into this business as a result of the first Earth Day in 1970. I'll leave it to you whether that's good news or bad news! To celebrate Earth Day, District staff will be providing educational booths at two community events on Saturday. April 26. Imagination Celebration—La Habra Children's Museum —The District will be featuring the "Save the Sea Life Game"—kids save plastic sea creatures from polluted water by scooping put trash. This will be an educational booth highlighting what people can do to help prevent the pollution problems associated with urban runoff. Earth Dav Expo—Huntington Beach Pier Plaza Area—Organized by Golden West College The District will be hosting a general information/education booth at this event. Highlighted issues will be urban runoff, Huntington Beach Summer studies, ocean monitoring and the move to full secondary treatment standards. Board of Directors Page 5 March 19, 2003 Construction Outreach OCSD sent 1,300 letters to residents who live along the Bushard Trunk Sewer Replacement route. The letter provided a description of the work that would take place, estimated the time frame for completion and what streets would be impacted. We continue to update residents as the work progresses. Updates are available on our website at www.ocsd.com under Information Center/Construction/Latest News. Articles of Interest I have also included several additional published articles that you might find interesting. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. AAR&4L�_ Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:lt 6\WRDTAW IMLM MERE TD THE BDMD'9 1903 MO DLETTER.DOL Attachments SCAPRegulatory Assistance for Collection Agencies 9()UTHMCALFMWA&UANM0F What is SCAP? SCAP is an alliance of cities, special districts and other wastewater collection agencies designed to assist its members in effecting and meeting federal, state and local regulations. In short, we're here to help you meet the challenges of the ever changing, ever increasing regulatory environment. How can SCAP help you? As an owner or operator of a sanitary collection system, you are aware of the ever-increasing demands that the regulatory environment plays on you and on your staff. Recently enacted requirements of the Sanitary Sewer Overflow Rules, Sewer System Management Practices, Fats- Oils-Grease Control Programs and the impending EPA cMOM rules are placing increasing demands on staff. SCAP is here to help you meet these and other regulatory challenges. Come and find out more... Workshops in conveniently located areas are currenfly being planned to discuss how SCAP can best assist you as a collection system owner or operator in meeting the current regulatory challenges. Look for more information in early 2003 about these upcoming workshops. Need more information? Contact the SCAP office at (949) 489-7676 or e-mail us at kris@scap.occoxmail.com. You can also find more about us on the web at www.scapl.org. d9200Rantlm VpdoR d,sups B,sm Jwn Cai, tl ,r M75 TO:(949) s 6 F.(WO) p IW WaEdib:wwx.�I-M e w .o m O nWi O m O i ORANGE COUNTY 2Park Plaza,Suite 100 Irvine,Califouia92614.5904 BUSUGM COUNCIL plwne:949.476.2242 • fax:949.476.9240 • urkuunw.oebc.org MEMORANDUM DATE: March 5, 2003 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Stan Oftelie, President & CEO Julie Puentes, Executive Vice President Public Affairs Wallace Walrod, Vice President Research & Communications SUBJECT:: 2003 Orange County Infrastructure Summit Recommendation: Receive and file. Discussion: The first Orange County Infrastructure Summit was held at the Hyatt Regency Huntington Beach on February 11, 2003 to an overflow crowd. Over 250 local leaders attended to engage in interactive dialogue addressing Orange County's future infrastructure challenges. Speakers included Ray Watson, Mark Baldassare, and OCBC Board Members Steve Bone, Bill Habermehl, and Blake Anderson. A summary of the event is attached, along with the extensive press coverage the event received. Additionally, Julie Puentes and Wallace Walrod appeared on KOCE's February 13 "Real Orange" program to discuss the event. Stan Oftelie and Wallace Walrod presented information from Orange County's event at a statewide California Policy Reform Network (CPRN) Roundtable on "Infrastructure Financing Options" in Sacramento on February 27, 2003. Over 80 infrastructure policy experts from around California attended. An electronic summary of the event was distributed to an additional 5,000 people on the CPRN distribution list. Attachments: 2003 Orange County Infrastructure Summit Agenda California Policy Reform Network "eSummary" of the Orange County event Orange County Register and LA Times coverage of the event CPRN Sacramento presentation SHAPING ORANGE COUNTY'S ECONOMIC SUTURE President's Message Continued from page 1 at the same time California suffers as a Democratic definite public perception that government is beep Ronson Barry r9�'1900%ifa slate in a Republican dominated nation. It seems wasteful.Al the same time, in a recent statewide Pre.eenl We 655.3995 FAX that anyway that OC turns it bits short of getting its poll,as much as 75%of the general public did not ro ny@harro a .rem fair sham of the money. We must begin planning feel confident to define or discuss in detail the term Seel.We.... 714.834.5679 now to ensure that Measure "M" is reauthorized "infrastructure".Schools and transportation were at vke Preemex 714.934.51M FAX before it "sunsets" in 2011. We also need to the top of OC's biggest infrastructure concerns. .1.n..,a@pkd ocyn.-.mm support future propositions that keep ourgas taxes Recent polls have attempted to feel out the public's or.9 Harem. 949.433.5560 earmarked exclusively for transportation tolerance towards changing the present 2/3's Treasurer 919453.0228FAX improvements majority required to pass new funding measures. he;eriz&; .CM1 Since more funding is needed to shore up our John Fresno 714.665.4500 Bill Habermehl-Sucerintendent of failing infrastructure, new alternatives, including a secretary 7146654501 FAX Schools and serves on OCBC Board 50%+1 and a 55% are beingconsidered pnnho9anr�nnnr_mm As many as 76%of Californians have placed their to facilitate the pa ge of new funding Don",He U9.833.5588x14l kids in schools outside of the public system. OC propositions.However,70%of OC thinks its good Past Proseenl 949.633.5511 FAX dcu..@;1x9mupmm has had to deal with an increase of over 10,000 to have these checks and balances in place and students injustthe last yearalone.Whetheror not even our educated ']3ro4nfrastructure Summit your Kitts attend them, the quality of our public attendees were leery of placing the approval Neil Morrrsen 949.608.5888 schools has a direct effect on the quality of OC's threshold too lay when they were polled at the AwadSa na. .m. 9a.not965 FA% lifestyle, R not for the measureless value of an meeting after all we're mostly Republicans). mdmommn 9,608,el lfe6tYle 9 ( Y P ) fiam All 714.751.73" educated society, then for the measurable Although as many as 62% of those polled in a Conunutna Edumuon 714.54s UM FAx increase in both the value ofour mal estate and the recent CC survey were in favor of extending sae©psomas.mm ability to attract good employees to the area. The Measure "M", that would still not be enough to Nell Morison 949.605.54ee good news on the horizon for OC's schools is that meet our present 213's majority requirement PFROMrof L won We 608.5965 FAX rod..rn.@oo.. et there have been 11 recent local school bonds Mark Oalmru. 71as6s.asoo approved to modernize our facilities.While bonds Blake Anderson-General Manager of High s ooi omreag 714.665.45m FAX are often perceived as just another tax, they are OCSO and serves on OCBC Board madwskoms�hfine rem Fred J.Meter 714.550.7551 actually superlorlo taxes in that more of the money ifwefail to act we will continue to suffer a decay in Hol.ry 8 HeMa9e 714 5M.7551 FAX collected slays in OC.It is estimated that because the quality of Iffe in OC and there will also be a net O.emalar$a9l.mm of OC's "donor' status, we are shorted loss of jabs and businesses in California A wen- nm Dzmvra 714s68.7300 approximately $25 million each year In sdlool planned approach of continuous investment, W�erchip Cher azmva®bF'mc mein sos FaX funding as compared to the state average of what especialy through these leaner times,will actually other counties receive. result in better construction bid values and stitd+in- Georg.J.do. 949.7m.8111 fine savings.We stand to save mom money in the h 50M Annrversa7ry N9.753.orfi FM 9mrpetigPengorii. Herb Nakasone—Manager of OC Flood long run through continuous investment rather Joeeoe Noncom. 94gAmse38 Control Division than waiting until things fail and then replacing P".. 919472.83>3 FAX Many of our present Best Management Practices them at as much as twice the cost. We need to recsquaaekbl r, are less effective than their price tag would lead find ways oprovide our leaders the-political rover" mehard Hart 949.855.7021 Prof.pnu*e staWT8007 FAx you tobelieve(i.e.some Dash booms have been requiredtoenable them to do the right thing for m.r1®rbl.mm found to be only 30% effective, thus 70% of the CC's infrastructure.In thisway OC's politicians can rraeihereen shmrmr 94s.M.9336 trash gets through). In the past we designed make better decisions with an eye for the bngderm StueentA ues 9a9.72773N FAX kshnkai�bocrueom.can concrete channels to rush the water (and noljust the next election. reed Abarn. 949.583.1010 pollutants)to the ocean. Now we are pushing for ywger F.N9M 51159 FAX more natural channels,which increase infiltration Congratulations Local Civil Engineers and reduce mnoff (thus reducing pollutants) but for Effectively Rallying the OC Mika HooWelosite 94,453 0223 F pre also result in higher maintenance costs. It is Community MikeASCE HooRh 949.453.5 53 Y g hmbhan@irwa rem hard to fathom that OC spent $62.3 million on We should be especially proud of all the had work Yaadan emrani 714.982.9140 urban runofr last year and still ended up with a"D" that so many of our ASCE OC Branch Civil OC.Report card n49emt FAx grade. It also concerning that as much as 67% Engineering leaders have donated to the cause. yeCerd i714982tel 9 9 n9 9 stir..Esmond 714.n6.9544 of our NPDES costs last year went toward Their efforts have signifxandy helped to spread the Publicly 714776.9541 FAX overhead & maintenance. To meet our future message to local politicians, media and the sesmond@lv" ,com urban run-off needs we will likely need to establish business community that there is a real need for Anne Awad 800.234.8644 a countywide funded dishic,similar to our present infrastructure planning and investment in OC.We klede sdud oweam F anon= eawad vestech.mm CCFCD system recognize that we can't do it on our own and reed some powerful allies in the fight to keep the cause Nell Jordan 949.341.6012 Mark Baldassare-Research Director moving forward. It will be an even a prouder day Hydroloc ya Hyaraulim for the Public Policy Institute of when our combined efforts finally turn the tide of N9.3416059 FAX Califomia public opinion and we begin to physically address nimaan@eapon7146 The current dlstmsl in government seems o be and improve, one-by-one, our rradeeP JOFda ebw 714d6a1667 9 P Y Pressing rransoonar.� 714460-1610 FAX paralleling the record low voter turnouts.There is a infrastructure needs. Munaratre®hntb.mm 2 ASCE-OC Newsletter • March 2003 C3 -60 , ORAMON000NTY 2Park plea,Suite lW . Irvine,Cailfurnia 92614-5904 BUSINESS COUNCIL phone:949.476.2242 fax:949.476.9240 • ud vGG..ocbc.org MEMORANDUM DATE: March 5, 2003 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Stan Oftelie, President & CEO Julie Fuentes, Executive Vice President Public Affairs Wallace Walrod, Vice President Research & Communications SUBJECT 2003 Orange County Infrastructure Summit Recommendation: Receive and file. Discussion: The first Orange County Infrastructure Summit was held at the Hyatt Regency Huntington Beach on February 11, 2003 to an overflow crowd. Over 250 local leaders attended to engage in interactive dialogue addressing Orange County's future infrastructure challenges. Speakers included Ray Watson, Mark Baldassare, and OCBC Board Members Steve Bone, Bill Habermehl, and Blake Anderson. A summary of the event is attached, along with the extensive press coverage the event received. Additionally, Julie Fuentes and Wallace Walrod appeared on KOCE's February 13 "Real Orange" program to discuss the event. Stan Oftelie and Wallace Walrod presented information from Orange County's event at a statewide California Policy Reform Network (CPRN) Roundtable on "Infrastructure Financing Options" in Sacramento on February 27, 2003. Over 80 infrastructure policy experts from around California attended. An electronic summary of the event was distributed to an additional 5,000 people on the CPRN distribution list. Attachments: 2003 Orange County Infrastructure Summit Agenda California Policy Reform Network "eSummary" of the Orange County event Orange County Register and LA Times coverage of the event CPRN Sacramento presentation SHAPING ORANGE COUNTY'S ECONOMIC FUTURE California Policy Forum eSummary Page I of 4 G -- - - eSummary Policy Reform Network Sponsored by Q(D e5ummary of forum held on February 11, 2003 -AIDLe"summery? ORANONCOUNTY RUSINECS COUNCIL 2003 Orange County Infrastructure Summit Improving grades will come at a hefty price One look at the brand-new Hyatt Regency in Huntington Beach—where the 2003 Orange CENTER County Infrastructure Summit was held on awn n r February 11 —and the casual observer ORANGE would think all was right with Orange COUNTY County. CalRomla RII&M Results from Orange County's 2002 - America CmIltion Infrastructure Report Card told a different and story, however, prompting the Orange 7California t.or Reform Networ County Business Council to sponsor this k event, where the rain pouring outside foreshadowed the gloomy outlook inside. Graded on its performance In eight categories (Aviation; Parks, Recreation, and eSummary Environmental; School Facilities; Solid Waste; Transportation; Urban Runoff and Forum Agenda Flood Control;Water; and Wastewater), the county earned itself a"C"overall. Forum Preseo= The score could have been worse, but it also most certainly could—and should — Forward to a Friend have been better. If Orange County hopes to improve, it must first remedy its lowest scores, assigned to transportation, school facilities, and urban Schad Ii of Forums runoff/flooding (a C. D+, and D, respectively). With that in mind, the summit focused its attention on these three areas. Past e5ummarles 511-12a;r-Ift 4 more http://www.calpolicyreform.net/esummaries/021103/index.htm 03/05/2003 California Policy Forum cSummary Page 2 of 4 Overheard "There is a huge gulf "Are our current leaders refusing to lead, or is the public now refusing to let them between the lead?"—Ray Watson, keynote speaker, lamenting the change in political climate concerns of over the past three decades. the state's "If this were a student,we'd consider him at-risk. He can do well if given more policy elite resources and support, but left alone, he's likely to backslide and fail."—Monte and the Ward, Director of Special Projects, Orange County Transit Authority strong "Ifs nice,as county superintendent, to start out my first term with that kind of opinions of grade, because ifs only going to get better."—Bill Habermehl,Superintendent of the Schools, Orange County Department of Education, putting a positive spin on the electorate" state of Orange County school facilities. 'The public starts with the perception that there's enough money[for public works -- Ray projects].Irs your job to convince them if you want to ask them for money.Good Watson, luckl"—Mark Baldassare of the Public Policy Institute of California. renowned planner & architect In the News... some stories may require registration 4 Congested Crowded and Dirty-OC Register 4 OC Leaders Meet to Assess Infrastructure-OC Register 4 Infrastructure Imploding-OC Register 4 $20 Billion Needed for Upgrades. Panel Says-LA Times Additional Resources i See the Event Flier codf Me WUiM free MOW Aembap http://vvww.calpolicyrefonn.neVcs=maries/021103/index.htm 03/05/2003 ' California Policy Foram CSummary Page 3'of 4 i See the Program(pdf file requires free Adobe Aaobaq About the CPR Network CPR Network is a new civic partnership advancing stale policy reform in the areas of Infrastructure and growth. CPR Network partners include civic organizations that operate at the regional level dealing with issues on the ground such as local tax policy, transportation and housing. Other partners include statewide membership organizations representing labor,cities, counties, schools, and the Infrastructure communities. While the regions represented in the group are from different parts of the state and the constituencies represented are diverse—labor, business, local government—these organizations agree that state-level infrastructure policy needs reform and input from regional voices can improve the solutions. Network Partners i Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Communities 4 California Center for Renional Leadership 4 California Rebuild Amli Coalition 4 California Works Foundation 4 Center for Governmental Studies d Cities Counties and Schools Partnership 4 The Local Government Commission + Orange County Business Council/Center for a New OragCoun-ty i San Diego Dialogue 4 Valley Vision Foundation Supporters The California Policy Reform Network(CPR Network)is made possible through the generosity of the James Irvine Foundation and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. To learn more about the CPR Network, please visit www.calpolicyreform.net. Because of yDvr expnsand infensf in Cefifom/apolicy slam issues,we are ddfghfed fo induee you in ourperiooYc newsletter which often you bnpodent Information an Calgomia Inhashudum arW polbes,as well ss whet regions are doing b a amss these issues. we ratio you wig find this Nrormeflon useful end infamabva.lfel anypoW you wish to bo moved flan mrimAng,you maysimpfymplyto the message w@h the wand Lnsubsaibe'M fhe sub/ed tine,a sender~b mm®ms av with fin word Lnsubscriba'/n fire subject fine.Unsubscvee MaMadions wis also appearin each easier,m you meytlWmM b unaubscribe at anytime. This email was sent to: ((emallAddress)j http://www.calpolicyreform.net/esummaries/021103/index.htm 03/05/2003 California Policy Forum eSummary Page I of 6 eSummary Policy Reform Network M - MMMMMM�� Sponsored by !! `■ eSummary of forum held on February li, 2003 (V( J ORANON COUNTY Improving grades will come at a hefty price, BUSINIMS C01 INCt6 continued 0 The crumbling infrastructure plaguing Orange County is not a new problem. It has, according to keynote speaker and renown planner and architect, Ray Watson, been building for a little over 30 years. Coming out of World War II, the nation aggressively attacked an infrastructure that had fallen into disrepair, CENTER beginning with the Great Depression and lasting well into the forties. oni r!w ORANGE From 1945-1965, citizens trusted their leaders to win the war at home as they COUNTY had overseas, and our elected officials rewarded that faith with results. Somewhere along the way, definitely by the early seventies, what Watson termed Callfornla a b and a"declining public leadership"led Orange County to the state it's currently in right America Coalition now. The subsequent disillusionment with government had another costly effect: and the public's unwillingness to pay for repairs, a major shift from years prior. California Policy Reform Network The result, said Watson, is an infrastructure in dire need of attention. Bringing the problem to the forefront of people's consciousness now rests with policy reformers like those in attendance. Unfortunately, the public either doesn't believe eSummary the problem is as bad as it Is, or simply doesn't care. E¢svmsanda Participating in an electronic poll during opening remarks, the audience seemed Forum Presenters convinced that life in Orange County would be worse in 20 years. Some, EarfflrJ_t9A FrAnd however,felt it would remain the same, something that would please Watson very much. Schedule of Forum• Past esummarles "I think it's a wonderful place to live now. If it's just as good 20 years from now, that's a real triumph, but I'm not sure it's going to be just as good, unless we Subscribe address the problems that you're all here to solve." http://www.calpolicyrefonn.net/esummuies/021103/page2.htm 03/05/2003 Califomia Policy Forum eSummary Page 2 of 6 Offering their thoughts on how to do just that were three guest panelists,one from each of the targeted areas of concern. Up first was Monte Ward, Director of Special Projects for the Orange County Transit Authority. Transportation Improving upon that C that requires recognizing why that score occurred in the first place. Orange County,Ward said, has been blessed with a beautiful climate and a vibrant and diverse economy.There is a price to pay for the high quality of life,however, and traffic is it. Quite simply, people want to live here, and there will be 730,000 more of them by the year 2030. Orange County is already the nation's fifth most populated county, and if it were a city, it would be fourth. Only 144,000 housing units will be added, however,and the search for affordable housing will increase commuting within its borders.There will also be 560,000 additional jobs, and with this economic growth comes increased freight rail and truck travel. A C is certainly better than what a 1990 report card would have yielded,thanks to physical improvements provided by Measure M and the addition of toll roads. Unfortunately, the growth that Orange County has already experienced is rapidly making those improvements obsolete. By 2025,Ward indicated, a person will make an average of 24 more trips on the highway system each year, and hours of delay will increase fivefold. Leave yourself plenty of time to get where you're going, because average freeway speed will drop from 43 mph to 22 mph. That, he says, is the nightmare drivers will have to look forward to if more funds are not made available. By 2030,Ward expects$24 billion in funding to maintain, expand, and rehabilitate highways, roads, and transit systems. It's a staggering number, but still not enough to earn a B. For that,an additional$9.5 billion must be invested. Only one question remains: Where will it all come from? Reauthorization of Measure M, for one: unfortunately, a two-thirds majority will be required to extend it past 2011. It's a number that seems unlikely to be achieved, even though Measure M has done its job. Without M in place, Orange County can expect to lose roughly$230 million in funding after it expires. Another obstacle is that Orange County is a donor county, meaning it sends more in taxes to Sacramento and Washington, D.C. than it gets back. Getting what http://w .calpolicyrefom.nettesu mies/021103/page2.htm 03/05/2003 California Policy Forum eSummary Page 3-'of 6 Ward said Is its"fair share"would be a big step on the way toward rebuilding the infrastructure Looking back, said Ward, we have made progress. For now,and in the near future,the county will maintain its C. Past 2011, however, the risk of"falling seriously behind"is a certainty if change does not occur. Schools Speaking next was Bill Habermehl, the new Superintendent of Schools for Orange County, having just begun a four-year term in January. He certainly has his work cut out for him, as there are many barriers that must be overcome before that D can be changed into something higher. Part of the problem is that voters-over 70 percent-do not have children in schools. Most people think the problem with schools is someone elm's responsibility; hence the reluctance to part with hard earned tax dollars. But you can't lay the problems with schools at someone else's doorstep, says Habemrehl, because businesses are drawn to areas with a top-notch public education system. Being surrounded by good schools means not having to look elsewhere for labor. If you don't care about schools, you're likely harming the local economy. Another drawback is that, as in the area of transportation, Orange County is a donor county when it comes to education,receiving far less than the state average,shortchanged$25 million last year alone. Also like transportation,the population influx-18,000 students over the past two years-has contributed to the infrastructure headaches. Construction, according to Habermehl, couldn't move fast enough, and overcrowding has robbed schools of auditoriums and lunchrooms. It's also difficult to rectify the situation when no one knows about it. Orange County has no major television news media of its own, Habermehl noted, and Los Angeles has shown little concern for what was going on there in regards to schools. Despite all these strikes against it, schools-unlike transportation-seem to be moving in the right direction,so much so that Habermehl will be shooting for an A the next time around. http://w .calpolicyreform.net/esummuies/021103/Page2.htm 03/05/2003 Califnmia Policy Forum eSummary Page 4 of 6 The statewide Prop 47 is pumping almost a half-billion dollars into schools, and voter apathy seems to be lessening throughout the county, as evidenced by 11 recently passed bond issues that will keep 100 percent of the money at home. Urban RunoHlFlooding The final panelist was Herb Nakasone, manager of the good control division,and his Job was the toughest, having to explain why the agency he represented had scored the lowest on the report card. "Urban runoff," Nakasone explained, ,.means a lot of things to a lot of different people." He himself defines it as the year-round runoff, both storm and non-storm water flowing untreated to beaches and streams. Nakasone isn'tsurprised by the grade;combating the problem of runoff is still in its infancy, and they're still unsure how to handle it. One way they know is effective is through education, getting the word out. Activities like the high school students he saw washing cars in a restaurant parking lot contribute to runoff. That water flows into sewers unequipped to handle what was then an unforeseen problem, ones which now also must be dealt with. Treatment facilities also collect only 30 percent of garbage—meaning 70 percent gets through to the streams or ocean. "Putting a Band-Aid on a broken arm"is how he summed up current efforts to control runoff. If there is a silver lining, it's that they have a much better handle on flood control, primarily because they've been in that business longer. The biggest problem is maintenance, as it's no longer acceptable to simply build a concrete channel. The demand now Is for something more natural looking, and that doesn't disturb the habitat. While they don't quite know how to prevent urban runoff,they realize that it will take money—lots of it.Anywhere from$63 million to$70 million a year is spent countywide. To move up to a 8, Nakasone said, those funds would have to quadruple. It also needs its own funding source, rather than coming out of the flood control budget. Can the three panelists reasonably expect to see their wish lists become reality? They've got a tough road ahead of them,especially when you consider the results from one poll conducted by Mark Baldassare, research director for the Public Policy Institute of California. Three out of four Orange County residents said they knew little or nothing about the subject of Infrastructure. http://www.calpolicyreform.net/esummaries/021103/page2.htm 03/05/2003 ' California Policy Forum eSurnmary Page 5"of 6 Fortunately,that's something that can be remedied. Like a child failing in school, it begins with making sure that Mom and Dad are actually aware of the report card. a Return to the eSummary About the CPR Network CPR Network is a new civic partnership advancing state policy reform in the areas of infrastructure and growth. CPR Network partners include civic organizations that operate at the regional level dealing with issues on the ground such as local tax policy, transportation and housing. Other partners include statewide membership organizations representing labor, cities, counties, schools, and the infrastructure communities. While the regions represented in the group are from different parts of the state and the constituencies represented are diverse—labor, business, local government—these organizations agree that state level infrastructure policy needs reform and input from regional voices can improve the solutions. Network Partners • Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Communities • California Center for Regional Leadership • California Rebuild America Coalition • California Works Foundation • Center for Governmental Studies • Cities Counties and Schools Partnership • The Local Government Commission • Orance County Business Council/Center for a New Orange County • San Diego Dialogue a Valley Vision Foundation Supporters The California Policy Reform Network(CPR Network) is made possible through the generosity of the James Irvine Foundation and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. To learn more about the CPR Network, please visit www caloolicvreform.neL Because d ywaespressadmbmst in CalibreMpolrymform Iswes.we are oedghtedb indude you In ourpedodie newsletter which offers you bnpodentinbnnadon on Celdomie Mheshudumandpolities.as well ea whet regions era tldng batlEress theseissues.WehWe you witlfindthis mbrmafbn usalul endb/ormatim.Iret anypo'nt you wash to be removed rmrn ourmaift,,you maysimplyraply to Iha message with Me word Lnsubsenbe'w the subject One,msend an ematl b gpmlillcas om MM Me ward Lnsubsaibe'm the subject line.UnsubsuMa msfmdions MI dw,,wrin each addbn,w ywr may choose fo unwwwme at anyfeae. http://www.calpolicyreform.net/esummaries/021103/page2.htm 03/05/2003 Califomia Policy Forum eSummary Page 6 of 6 This email was sent to: {{emailAEdress)) http://www.calpolicyreform.neVesummaries/021103/page2.htm 03/05/2003 THE ORANGE COUNTY RWISMR • a-ta-o3 O.C. leaders cest a,�!�I� meet to assess Ilo.r,wam me. infrastructure YYd Y d p u pr led a u+roamYals tpp YYRm Most agree sweeping improvements are m'",n`"" '�,�`w needed, but money is the big question.,,, rfra ieren 4� AboveeP50 Orards, D,mrnty busirYs and gorenm,ent lead- �tr�0't�p1YO tr rs ptherl in a Hentbrgwn .sae GaWa'®smppwwa? esurin hi baRreom Tuesdayw figure out bow to raise the coup. lyw abpar of rfornrerce ware- aae'w own, eraluaUan of na clogged wyy �Y4 —da,chr ea echoots and aim' beaches Reanwae •�s . Conedncea dim lack(ands w .moan highwazs, build clal sw.earn macanno end clean nmopat a time phlw of revs a stew buapet a., as partitipenra at the fare avrual sa Yrltemarrnwmwvearaieh • rwhver O Cann hanrcorre Summers via Net" efrom raitirg mnyb Ylrhbzluet amesusesmWearrtrvlongeare tax revenue for wfi—v4utNae. Though leaders share res rre�va den.'priorities-most vid drey ' pass schools and reeds m.r—a;. mrbuidmg airpoM1s - their 1pYywgkleeaMgroe YeaseY payment plan Wem mnkMly YeaMrWeWwtrawettlNnpgeds fmm their n aMEerNRnt R told Resider. revel tr old poll- ma their' 'wearral few' Ru.h arM rcjmyctl ncry wo-c n wiwe iYn war omttrw.`aY M .wwdwNwwNswwd ruayre 1. W M finefr XalvwnaaweZm�an •rail�\Ye6 wenMnnNt FJi o wrarrr, mars.Y.'w�wY,Rvryn/M fraaOrb4aarwM1g4p rM heN RplSter What's pert Some steps county leaders wal take to na annq mNlstru[lure. TIN,Center for a New mange County.a :r.dfion of paptment Denials and ma ,a,.,,at,.like wan Disney Co.and the Inure Ca..will meet reaularty to er glare antic private partnerships and am- pnann to satin.....that sound mtra- strudew attracts and tritium mpa vls Ennui will follow up with another u Ira9rudure report raid In happens Government leaders will Csanee their hratearts if the evaluation finds them sidmad • -Since laziness leaders will capai mfn Ior a 1001 Wllot measure that would ear- nark a sure"of slate this or it -astrumure. Infrastructure imploding O.C.'s leaders have a -IW���papal that fo an o,,, multibillion-dollar mM heMly.nmthut Mmwa. challenge: persuading w+.d N new raAeed,mNum the tax-wary public to pJ,nHO elementary .ma..M roam pay for public works. :.atr�eerfo m ire did IWN of'shade of pollmea ahem r.npmw\ rope wore, ovedwdup wows. ma a ..ran plane or relyin,wlely on method, like tmmaLwow.rid, oNY.el>nre are,Nutniek ha wMt Naeo�ld- 3owor Iofthe iiw. ma perfmtly reweowhle appre,eM1 'We're n the Abnt or and he.INg teams In Mr smell lows, ton'I have.Hurt lase rat.Na W whkA bmm . lay eery, worth ai °olve the prebara'or dirty canoe, re.she domdt ddee. tale kanm Herb N, a ,who omal fe0,rather,Me drive.only-rain the county.Iloodemhol proeeard. at .k.ovag,as all ewe Juan C. '^The Ida w do bane, we're not patrew re idenu know that Nth ere how, the ae they are_' real,Comtabuy flooded by mmmu- ° Uoeplu mwh peyii ierr, Iwdora temp day-tHpwm and Imata lust emerged upbeat, espeeiauy ,Mr rigbtut,W at M the g,mery wore. Blake kedermn,general mwger of -them ere e ,tadd plaraw in towel you Ne cramp,COWry$arnanon Dle abaoluMly have M amid.' trim,eloped with .wed-1 tale-. Irutnlek also low-as all Said Juan pW anpetmn tmavoll apandleg —A..hove-an explanation for ninfrutrvmure and an admonition why i1 ern Mks nearly en boom to to mwry rM'Wburam W .ace art x hen M.Z°wusrn4e city: no wAat hewllad lAN Cregorien shade acsl Mph arke d. rorc{ng students of'No New,Tun." and pa ten.i.M lane.. . Howere,,if San Joan'.eeperimee why do we keep briagity teas M a.fly guide.I,'.pair,to rake more other mwru to go M aebml when Nan ame,l pamwwwo w rye what they or o d hold chaoN bare for Us N.taunt". their own thildfenn•.he ukea. About ffio orangew Cory beat TLaugh mwav;dt,raided.spee r eand povermnenr leader. wilt that(dreld,Ititlr ilia m crandad re! i. . HuodOidan &.th hotel high cehoaa a th'M Warrant dtiur Totaaay Wawwer l(uttih'.cans. to.lnm said iddem aoiaH-tows feel. clan-and Nnug,, rNon arh— i-etwe, Br . city hlkh 'hinge teeny vide cope ware xbml a bowed sewn an growh when ina hatka.m of aging medal debate, and fear. that xMel., jammed made and dirty wleir,on.odrmtmerure problem flows col tM.new a Weedy NII ell earb.M another.Melee. brealtir,� Though the Cary Wt year aaopmd W,yeas,.lmal anproom working ownprehanainn, tramporution with the Unboamny of CaU mle,11 plan w edwe gnN¢k,no one kmw vane,wehml dengin«ring turned. boor to pay the pdendagy banor„d robedng report card an the manly. tell...It would him-am how an per pubnt,warka resume. Trwpar su.do relphho,ag ddm to.eemd. ution, ached build o,sod urban berate the ram San Juan want.W amne par n npttitl dmbbfr,,owed. ,hunt or h,wotla ing a C Ad tea D's.,mpea,Ively ,end prowlsled wfbr w.Tbu,a The tY higlrva� d�y deadline b nk a waMr9wld, imn ded, be ,hook vra,m- i pmvemero plan.whar it I.simply p.and noon<ontml mamrel.read. Isunrhing . cityw .a ide lead.wr 6rly mad poguW runoff anb p p• education plan and hoping for the oar kewAre,IM repo torclubd n TmWeY.Madewe hwe"Id u et 'We haw Chas hug°.hose Mare pettier by the orange County Head- a. xutdtp taid.'Ne dlbd w Council and a toWtion or pow u'rear,it.ban we have to deal Nth �. ents and moor mmamhaw ,�a.md mmlmw. operate, e _ wMa ofreX air coals,and tampwmd anur de,nnm their Ica Nth a rated[ pan f me,4wY.wa Iaonly omidenta. ar lauowxrghrxwm. TM re.ule .—col wa,,,ert, prior uga,mom confwptu of help Ica and nwberow murmur°or t whom at emerged ft, reidents, thwart they Yore lead n'pnorltik,for W-weet dame pro joew,.h.m none of Nei,a—ter R. cal dmm or appetite for new tom. -The puhla aarM Nth the per. eepdm that there i enouph money' for 4uWt works pmjte.,waid dLrk Halbwre, a fellow at the Public Paul Irutltuo of California. who lea leaden through,mmp,ison of their view.wdN cwudtuma'."IV. ymrr job W evroviate them it you .at m sal Ihem for anon,...r:ootl lurk" The cram an"t.The money ..nWrinfenaent of rhea and om- elaa rmm tr.wparMaon we,rental .omrd,gamem mtunwled h would rap,billiow or N problem.. Some ptlo iiday Congested, crowded and dirty A team of engineers awarded Orange County's transportation system, school buildings and flood-control channels barely passing grades in a recent assessment. Here's what officials say they need to improve. TRANSPORTATION Grade: C Mhlests: Clogged freeways,not enough buses.County growth- 500.000 new residents in the next 20 years- will cause longer com- mutes.Senior population will grow fastest increasing need for public transit. Needed to h*wa:$5.3 billion for highways.$3.6 billion for buses and light rail,$500 million for local streets. PHOTOS:MICHAEL KITAGA,THE REGISTER EXPLOSIVE GROWTH:Traffic stacks up Tuesday on the corner of Del Obispo Street and Ortega(74) Highway In San Juan Capistrano. SCHOOL BINDINGS rr.de:o. Prideh atc County's 51L535 Stu- dents are severely crowded.lack playground space and sometimes at- tend schools withIdlice as many stu- dents as they can banEle. Nee. to imilr:-$500 million from recent state voter initiative and $1.5 billion in recent local bond mea- sures are enablingllfstrlcts to build more Classrooms. - SCHOOLWORK: Workers ride a tractor Tuesday atthe site of the pro- posed San Juan Hills High near Ortega Highway and La Pat&Avenue. URBAN RUNOFF Greek:D PraMeWe:Flood-control channels speed runoff from lawns,driveways, gutters and construction sites into ocean,forcing polluted beaches to close and harming Orange County s tourism economy. Needefto hold , Leaders still _ searching for answers. Sewage plants call's�ddtense all runoff.Trash divefsiop'.fi1'ilooY•"Lbntrol channels stops anly 30 percent of debris. Residents like washing cars in drive- ways.About$960 million needed to upgrade channels and stop some POLLUTION: Water from Tuesday's rain flows through the San Juan River debris. system In south Orange County. Polluted runoff often forces beach closures. pacific clippings p all It 1 1 7 a 9 Santa ana, ea1B. 92711 IUNgeksToes �OREB 1 2 2003 rillioned forades,l Saysgthefundsrmds,ewagepiMhill battle.VIr.aoay. torshee want'vim.W ceb w hIWUVUuh. Ne dirt Me aewaea on eehhei pUes.hoed,.- el wa weter plpel wtl ocher IMaet.%W .t eortane to DweY6b -en olwse cowry RhAheee cowcu mnfete ee Thet- OgvNHunWglonBueh almmnna the geeeN mouth, of the Onnd wwtY SeNGlbn M et, ew a mules toeta miler ehuce$1 btatntelwooeW eh,I ether t hhe NpTmq leer hhe ttanNortell e wpM2mevu,it Huuon m 0.f.arhoah, uon r%r tnoa e o sa ho von for waxeaetx w vm emmu. '1nveWnB N IMwtNb tore WeuwtW u melnlaln otwse wunty 1 vurocy of uR wa em hele D1oa ell Iq.• dam huste.ines murcU Pmleent eh.d.ue. Maetaon hehwe eRY' IutWI Ilb However.WW .eh wweeppmvY for sucH he he aa[pew4W S woWa loin. modally t e, Ht a vm )omyofnlemhtyxeMfe r hmttM rc Ray Watson,Paat phhh eed deer wake I teoc ..eot amr oft IMne w.,thee cau d luSe t leered r wa aeabper,ul6 There 6 a huge auR between Wm .lama of Wm .e two mu,ell.wa the etrwa ap The otterWup me" Lem' 'lte p he" feraelY P.. more taxes ro m Drovothte. ruaWR. t, he deed orehowt cpaerY n vat vmw. Wort vatmawu v atewee-tan In •aeeune m pvuuml Iwan- wphwreieh,te pwma- rmt Wee he of paV- choe' shoots.aemvma wmer auDDue.1. t att cmwaea moos etw. tvnn.ele to.se hle koua^ Maeron em rpet eer fl they ve,eetki rywr N themwry would D4Y br theimpmvetnenta. 0� Ili ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS COUNCIL Stan Oftelie, President & CEO February 27, 2003 Do you consider yourself primarily a: Infrastructure Professional ' . ' 58% M. Business Leader 13% Community Leader ge/a Elected Official 7% Government Official 12% 1 Thinking about the quality of life in Orange County, how do you think things are going. tirve rTM 1. very well 2. somewhat well mo 3. somewhat badly zec 4. very badly z Rdians 4 68% 20% AW L 1% 7 - 1 2 3 4 In the future, do you think Orange County will be a... 1. better place to live in than it is now 3'.. — , 2.worse place to live than it is now 77 3.there will be no change -. 4. don't know ' w 3 Revlon 9nrt 45% 33% 150/0 1�= 2 3 4 2 Which infrastructure project do you think should have top priority for public funds in Orange County? 0590 1.school facilities 2.surface transportation 3.water systems 59b 3* 4. sewer systems 1 2 3 4 s 6 S. airports 6. other 46% 33% 70/6 9W6 a� rlar�.ae�s� 1 2 3 4 5 6 How would you prefer state government pay for roads and other infrastructure? 1.Increase user fees 2.Set aside%of state budget IBVb 3.Issue state bonds 1 �y' IWb 4. Increase taxes S.Surplus budget funds 1 2 3 4 s 6 6.Other 45% 29% 618% .4% 3% 2oh 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 Would you vote to require part ofthe state'sgeneral fund to be transferred annually to an infrastructure fund? son 1.Yes m 2. No 3. Don't Know 1 2 3 L�lYlgb 9nn 84% 0 9% 7% 1 2 3 How satisfied are you with the way Measure M funds are being used for transportation projects in Orange County? 1.very satisfied 2.somewhat satisfied 3. not satisfied ,we Iwu 4. don't know 1 3 3 4 RevlcusYrtcy 39% 38% 9% 14% 1 2 3 4 4 Would you vote yes or noon an Orange County ballot measure to extend Measure M for another 20 years to fund transportation projects in Orange County? 1.yes 2. no 3.don't know 90% 8% 3% 1 2 3 What if this Measure M extension included funding for both transportation projects and other infrastructure projects? urm 1. yes 2. no 3. don't know � e aai� w 69% 27% 4% r= l 1 2 3 5 Do you think that requiring a two-thirds majority vote- instead of a 50 percent- plus one vote-for passing a local sales tax for local transportation projects is a good thing or a bad thing? 11% 1.good thing z 2, bad thing sae 3.don't know z 3 areno�a.Vzv 68% 30% 2% 1 2 3 Would you vote yes or no for a state ballot measure that would change the two-thirds majority to a 55 percent vote for passing a local sales tax for transportation projects? an 1.yes <sas 2.no 3.don't know sae �.... wevla srvp. 73% 26% 1^/0 1 2 3 6 Does local government have adequate funding for roads and other infrastructure needed to prepare Orange County for future growth? 1.does 2.does not -;;;,'•j u,w, 3.don't know ( qMIA 83% 10% 80/ 1 — 2 3 p�JIM 1q,E5,., 'fA1t5„ YOUR TAX s , DOLLARS AT WORK '� m �b _ J J SN Mee HMon r W Tu p wn erc n rcn m. n IM ce0,l murM�braq/mmiutivr 7 i can�r c>>uR! Ali - a 0CT A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP Orange County Transportation Authority County of Orange Orange County Sanitation District The Irvine Company The Walt Disney Corporation Fluor Corporation Orange County Business Council /1 CENTER ORANGE COUNTY 8 LGVe Otrn Comrnmrrr Ass>L rs Local. DeOicel<tl to Wh edin nfial L g A(Sire.Fire,HeeM entl weal Essential LOCAL Services w 'CalocaLorg SAVE THE DATE ! ! L.O.C.A. L. Legislative Action Days May 141h and 15th Sacramento, CA Join hundreds of local elected officials, public safety, health, labor and business groups from around the state and urge Legislators to protect our local services. ✓ Learn more about the LOCAL Coalition and what we are doing to protect local services; ✓ Meet with Legislators in their Capitol Offices and tell them how the budget affects Your community; ✓ Attend a news conference to show our unity and advocate for key LOCAL budget priorities; ✓ AND MORE. . . More information and instructions on how to RSVP for Legislative Action Days will be forthcoming. In the meantime, please contact Meghan Meisel at (916) 443-0872 or mmeisel(tbickerassmiates.mm for more information. LEAVE OUR CO Funds Funding AEEETe LOCAL Dedicatedan otherProne nss ntialLO for Pence. Fire,Health and other Essential LOCAL Semces www.calocal.org 2003 STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES Leave our Community Assets Local(LOCAL) is united on the growing imperative to protect our local services. The LOCAL Coalition will again be actively involved in the state budget process to ensure that funding for essential local services is not compromised. Following are some key principles that will guide the coalition: 1. Essential Local Services Should Not Be Sacrificed to Solve State Budget Problems. Police and fire protection. Emergency medical services. Hospital trauma care. Public health services. Road repair and maintenance. Clean drinking water. Parks. Libraries. Senior Services. These are just a few of the important local services that are provided by local governments in California. Sacrifices will be necessary to help close the State Budget gap, but essential local services should be protected from further cuts or reductions.The coalition believes the State should balance Its budget... ✓ Without taking or cutting sources of revenue that fund essential local services. ✓ Without imposing more of the financial responsibility on cities, counties or special districts for the cost of programs jointly funded by the state and local governments. Cuts in certain joint programs may be necessary, but the State should avoid shifting revenues or the responsibility for providing services from one local government to another. ✓ Without mandating additional programs or services on local governments without reimbursing them for the costs. 2. Local Governments and Local Revenues Are Already Part of the State Budget Solution. Already, large portions of taxes paid by local residents are used to fund state-controlled programs. Only a small portion of these revenues is left under local control to fund essential services such as fire, police and health services. And since 1992, the last time the State incurred a major budget deficit, billions of these local tax dollars have been diverted from local governments to the State—now totaling approx. $5 Billion annually. As a result, local services are stretched thin at a time when population and demands for services are soaring and local revenues are also down from a slowing economy. Our local services cannot and should not withstand further cuts. The LOCAL coalition will continue to be an active partner with the State to seek budget solutions that do not further erode funding from local services. 3. Revenue Enhancements @ dSpending Cuts Will Be Required — Both Should Place Emphasis on the Protection of Local Services. Given the magnitude of the State Budget deficit, a combination of spending cuts and revenue enhancements will likely be required to balance the budget. LOCAL and its 300+ members stand ready to work with the State to ensure that cuts to high priority programs are avoided and to support the revenue enhancements needed to protect high-priority programs. ✓ LOCAL will support reasonable revenue enhancements as an alternative to cutting funding for essential local services. In particular, LOCAL supports returning the Vehicle License Fee (VLF)to previous levels, as was guaranteed in low when the VLF was originally reduced. ✓ When forced to make difficult and unavoidable spending cuts, LOCAL encourages State Lawmakers to spare high-priority programs. LOCAL encourages the state to work with those that provide and those that depend on local services before making any cuts or reductions that could jeopardize the local services that all California residents rely on. Leave Our Community Assets Local • 1121 L. Street. Ste 803 . Sacramento. CA 95814 ASCE Orange County Branch Newsletter ASCE Mffiy;.IwaW.N wmxier.rseNrv.r e/w,[na�,rwn Published Monthly By the ASCE, Orange County Branch March 2003 3PRESIDENrs MESSAGE o OC'S INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGE— DEVELOPING "PUBLIC TRUST"AT THE "PUBLIC TROUGH" t'.'`•<i' f O n February 11, 2003 the quest to improve Orange Countys Infrastncture Report Card Is your E-mail Address Correct??? grades took its biggest step toward since ASCE Orange County is advancing into the the grades were unveiled last October.The Orange 21st Century with more communication and County Business Counal hosted an "Infrastructure announcements delivered by e-mail. Summit" at the brand new Hyatt Regency Hotel in Therefore we are trying to update the e-mail Huntington Beach. The event was very high tech, address it has for our members. by complete with instantaneous feedback from the On the mailing label located on the back of this Randall Berry audience by means of individual polling transmiltels newsletter is the e-mail address ASCE has for at each seat. you. If it is not coned or you wish to direct it to another e-mail address, please contact Tim The ability to vote on the issues was especially D'Zmura at d2mum@bhunc.com or giveASCE PMSiflenrk Musso9e ....:.. r-� effective In driving the presenters message home Membership a call at 1$00.548.2723. regarding the disparities betvveen the public's Thanks for your help. eoaro aolrepors, of our infrastructure Crisis Corn perceptionPared to that of the audience. Overwhelming 83% of Nose boiled down their presentation bmy perception of the s°'maas cdumn "'3 attending the Summit felt that California was not most stimulating and important issues they ms Ycur Cereer ....... ....w setting aside enough money for infrastructure,versus addressed. isananmv spaiso;s: .s only 530%of the general public in a recent statewide survey by the Public Policy Institute of California. Ray Watson-Renowned OC Planner and CabnEerol Events .. ..5 Architect erndi tiews ;r.- -sa The Summit addressed a fairly even ma of 'big Stop the Crisis Talk! It is a turnoff.A large portion of Picture"perspectives combined with a delatl3d focus the public thinks that the government already los teaaershro.....:1::...........:o on sane of gte underlying deficiencies at specific enough of their money and they're not interested to -semnar rid hand. Understandably,due to the shodnesc of tinic, healing ilwl die shy is falling.II's well beyond apathy the specific Infrastructure focus was upon the poorest at this point: its good old-fashioned cynicism. We scoring areas, namely Transportation (C), have to start from square one to regain public trust. iottenio Nis Eeaor 1a School Facilities (D+) and Urban Runoff/ The publics hesitation at this point is move of a ErmbHtt CPPWimdos ..:ISr) Flood Control (D). Little time was available to question of principal and politics, than a lark of devote to OC's relatively better rated infrasWcWre resources. Proving to the public that OC has a true rWWva.......:.......:17-19 systems,which induded Water(B),Solid Waste infrastructure netts will be critical to our future (B), Wastewater (C+), Parks/ Recreation/ success. Afemn oiJAmfo-.. ... ..20 Environmental(C)and Aviation(C+), Monty Ward—OCTA Transportation ASCE Central Guest Speaker Highlights Leader 1$06548-ASCE Often the most important messages delivered at Our transportation system is analogous 10 an"at rw these types of events are the speakers insights that student that's likely to slip from a passing"C"grade ASCE WEBSITE are presented between the facts and figures. To be to a'O"ff adequate attention is not provided in a bony. www.asce.org sure, the estimated $20 billion total infrastructure In order to improve our grades we must reduce the BranchlSection shortfall in OC resulted in a multitude of mind imbalance of our present'Donor County'and"Donor numbing breakdowns of various pementages and Stale" status. Unfortunately for Republican OC, Website projections from the various speakers. With that in California is a Denrooaticaly dominated state,while www.aseelasection.org mind, I tape the speakers do not mind that I have Continued an page 2 March Meeting Notion Thuadry.Mardi 20,20M TOPIC:SAN DIEGO DOWNTOWN BALLPARK INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT SPeARER:KEITH GRLFILIAN.SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT.BERRYMAN 8 HENIGAR MEETING PLACE DAVE AND BUSTERS at the Irvine spa rr TIME:11:30 AM:SOCIAL 11:45 AM:LUNCH 12:1Is1:00 PM:PROGRAM See enclosed flyer for etails President's Message Continued from page 1 atthe same lime California suffers as a Democratic definite public perception that govemment is being eernall arr7 rye=,oya state in a Republican dominated nation. It seems wasteful.At the some lime, in a recent statewide President 909655.3995 FAX that anyway that OC turns itfalls short of getting its poll,as much as 75%of the general public did not r1H,@hams ass«.wn, fair share of the money. We must begin planning feel confident to define ord'scuss in detail the tern seem Neater 714.934.5679 now to ensure that Measure "M` is reauthorized infrastructure".Schools and transportation were at M.PhommN 714.9345105 FAX before it "sunsets" in 2011. We also need to the top of CC's biggest infrastructure concems. solia.nasseni$Prm iio,m rem support future propositions that keep our as taxes Recent Is have g pot .tempted to feel out the publics Greg xeisrK 969A53.556o earmarked exclusively for transportation tolerance towards changing the present 23s Tiaawrer N9.4530736FAX improvements. majority required to pass new funding measures. neieroDima.we� Since mare funding is needed to shore up our J."No9en 714.665.4500 Bill Habermehl-Sumrintendent of failing infrastntclum, new atematives, including a Seoehary n4065 Schatils and serves on OCBC Board 50%+1 and a 55%ma' phnho9an@714665 4501 FAX a Arty,are being considered As many as 76%of Californians have placed their to facilitate the passage of new funding Don crone 9a9Jn3353ea141 kids in schools outside of the public system. OC propositions.However,70%of OC thinks as good Pan President 9C9.933 6511 FAX d ..@Qs9auP.oan has had to deal with an increase of over 10.000 to have these checks and balances in place and students in just the last year alone.Whether or not even our educated "prooinfiastructure Summit your kids attend them, the quality of our public atendees were leery of placing the approval Neil Marriaan 948.608.5698 schools has a awed effect an the quality of OC's threshold too low when they were poked at the Avs6sd Namboc 9a9 W9.5965 FAX h monuoe@mr.net lifestyle, t not for de meawreess value of an meeting (after all we're mostly Republicans). sem al 714.751.7373 educated society, then for the measurable Although as many as 62% of those polled in a Contrxi,Etl San 71a.5a5ss!13 FAX increasein both the value clout real estateand the recent OC survey were in favor of extending SaGQpsomaa o:m ability M attract good employees to the area.The Measure 'M", that would still not be enough to Nell Morrison 949.606.566E good news on the horizon for Oas schods's Mat meet our present 23's majorty requirement. PFRD.Pronei moms' o9@9.net965 FAX dram have been 11 re i local sclicol bonds Mare Oskar.. 716.66SAS00 approved to modem¢e our facilities.While bonds Blake Anderson-General Manager of High sUttml�W earAnfif whi FAX are often perceived as just another tax, they am OCSD and serves an OCBC Board oM� Fred J.Meter 714.650.75$1 actually superbrto taxes in that more of are money If wefail to actwe will continue b suffer adecay in History 8 Hedage 714 5`A.7551 FM collected stays in OC.It is estimated that,because the quality of life in OC and there will also be a net aedmear@aah.w.:. of OC's donor- status, we are shorted loss of jobs and businesses in California.A welF In.Dzm.n 714-56&730131 approximately $25 million each year in school planned approach of continuous investment, MmeersniP chen ma@dvin�m ssos FAx fundingto the state average as compared pa rage of what espedaYy through these leaner tinmes,will actually other countes receive. result in better construction bid values and stdtlh-in- Geerge Jurica 949.753.E111 1sOhh Mnivmsary Sig 7530n5 FAX time savings.We Stand t0 save mom money inthe 9ew9e@pengeng.wa Herb Nakasone-Manager of OC Flood long run thmugh continuous investment rather Jeakm Me.6rra 9e9w72-3 citinitrial Division Man wailing until linings fat and then replacing Fho9am iN9.4rt6173 FAX Many of our present Best Management practices them at as much as twice the cost We need to invs9ne�ae�trn.ure less effective Man their a4nerd xert 949A5 a s.7oz1 Pride tag would lead foci wars oprovide ourleaders the'politicel rover' Pat.Preciie 9a9.E3rr W7 FAX you to believe(i.e.some trash boons have been required to enable them to do the right thing for rh"uistdo'n found to be only 30% effective, thus 70% of to OC's Infrastructure.In thisway OC's politicians can Nmlr®..r shiner 949.727.9236 trash gels through). In de past we designed make beterdecisions with an eye forthe long-temp student Actvilite, 949 n7,73W FAX x,h„nxehDhrrsoiwons.wre concrete channels to rush the water (and not just the next election. Pearl Ae.rc i 969.5e3.1010 pollutants)to the ocean. Nov we are pushing for ywi Member saMe8351159 FAX more natural channels, which increase infiltrati ti on Congratulaons Local Civil Engineers @hu and reduce runoff (thus reducing pollutants) but for Effectively Rallyirm the OC Mike xoonhen 9,19AM 220 F they also�t in higher maintenance costs, It s Community Mike wehete 9,19AM 0220 FAX g homd,m@avd rum hard to fathom that OC spent $62.3 million on We should be especially proud of all the hard work yams.srerant 714.962.SO40 urban runoff last year and still ended up with a"D" that so many of our ASCE OC Branch Civil OC.Rapon cam 714h18zat FAX rate It is also concemin that as much as 67% Engineering leaders have donated to the cause. yt Caei@aim-wrP.ret 9 9 9 9 Steve Esmond 714.77S.9544 of our NPDES costs last year went toward Theireffats have significantly helped to spread the PUMM 714.n�5a1 FAX overhead & maintenance. To meet our future message to local politicians, media and the se:mone@ urban runoff needs we will likely need to establish business community that Mere is a heal reed for Anne Awaa E00.234.E640 a countywide funded district,similar to our present infrastructure planning and irwestrnent in OC.We .m.smod oweam fJdention]02 a,aaa avem.cgn OCFCD system. recognize that we cant do it on our om and deed some powerful allies in the fight to keep the cause Neil Jordan 949.341.6012 Mark Baldassare-Research Director moving forward. It will be an even a prouder day Hyaroio9ya Hydauhm for the Public Policy Institute OF when our combined efforts finally Wm the WE of 9i9 3416059 FAX California public opinion and we begin M physically address ,.dihi@s.eonemwa The wrent distrust in ovemment seems to be and improve, one-by-one, our g Prade,a Gammene 714Jt60-1667 g P Y pressing Tanapanahion 7144W 1610 FAX paralleling the record law voter xim uts.There is a infrastructure needs. pgunaratnc@hnhRwm 2 ASCE-OC Newsletter • March 2003 o I �Vlyhvl IN I 10 • ► 11► M LIVI ■ The year of public infrastructure: �a �Z transportation, aviation and water infrastructure issues make 2003 a busy year Am Fahey Director of Government Relations APWA Washington Office Nof In some dine have we seen a year quite like the kind 2003 is Other issues of the reauthorization debate will Include streamlining expected to be for policy-setting in Washington.These will of the environmental review process for transportation projects,midgat- course be significant budget and tax Issues,homeland security, ing congestion; preserving TEA-21's guaranteed funding provisions difficult foreign policy decisions and other emal matters of public In. and funding"firewalls"(the budgetary mechanism ensuring highway terest to be decided.But unlike recent years,2003 also will be a time trust fund revenues are Invested each year in hanspurtatlon);Improv- when Congress and the Administration will have perhaps its busiest Ing safety;promoting technology;and enhancing flexibility to address year In recent memory addressing an unprecedented public Inhastruc- state and local funding needs. rare agenda. Am-21 Two laws authorizing nearly S260 billion In federal funding expire this The Aviation Investment and Reform Ad for the 21st Century Is a year, one funding roads, bridges and public transportation, known three-year, S40 billion law that,like TEA-21,expires September 30 of ar TEA-21, the other funding airport Infrastructure and aviation pro- this year.Enacted In 2000,AIR-21 transformed aviation lnfrastmcmre grams,known as AIR-21.Reauthorizing just one of these in the course Investment policy In the same way TEA-21 did for surface transporta- of a year Is certainly a major undertaking;addressing both will ba an ban.It,too,provided guaranteed funding levels for aviation and tied enormous job. expenditures directly to aviation trust fund revenues. In addition to these two transportation Issues,Congress and the Ad- AIR-21 also provided significant funding Increasing for state and local ministration will ba considering ways to Increase investment in waste- airport intrartmdure. It reauthorized the Airport Improvement Pro- water and drinking water Inhutmcrure,an issue that was debated last gram(AIP),which provides more than$3 billion annually for capital year.The funding required to address the documented needs of aging Improvements for airport Intrashucture,and It allowed state and local and deteriorating systems Is estimated to be $23 billion annually. governments to Increase the cap on passenger facilities charges from These programs currently are funded without aumorl atiom. S3 to$4.50,to provide airports with funds to pay for arport constmc- don without using AIP funds. Other tsmes a well are expected to be on the 2003 Infrastructure poli- cy agenda.The list comprises future Investment In Intercity passenger Issues central to the AIR-21 reauthorization debate will be AIP fund. full,authorization of the Corps of Engineers water resources projects, Ing and eligibility, the financial dlf lcuines of the airline Industry, deployment of broadband, protecting vulnerable infrastructure, and aviation security,Issues associated with Federal Aviation Adminlstra. providing resources and suppers to state and local govemmmts for ban organization,preservation of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund emergency response and preparedness needs. ^firewalls"(which like TEA-21's firewalls tie revenues to funding),and the Essential Air Service Program.House Aviation Subcommittee Chair Nevertheless,the two hamportation and the water infrastructure Is- John Mma(R-FL)plans several hearings In the early pan of the year on sues together represent a sizable share of the nation's public Inhastruc. AIR41 reauthorization. Wit Investment and will occupy the attention of a numb"of Congres. sional committees and several federal agencies throughout the year as Wastewater and Drinking Water Infrasbudure part of a long public works todo list.Following Is a quick overview of Bills were Introduced last year In both the House and Senate to autho- these three Issues as they are being shaped at the start of 2003. rize tens of billions of dollars In multi-year funding through state re- volving loan fund(SRF)programs,to address the needs of aging drink- TEA-21 Ing were and wastewater Infrastructure.Currently,funding for these The Transportation Equity Ad for the 21st Century,TEA-21,the six- programs through SRFs touts approximately$2.2 billion annually. year, $218 billion highway, bridge and public tmmportation law, expires on September 30 of this year. When passed in 1998, it was Legislation to boost this Investment is expected to be debated again the largest transportation funding package ever signed Into law, and this year. Already In the House of Representatives, Reps. Sue Kelly It changed federal transportation policy by establishing guaranteed (8-NY) and Ellen Tauwher (D.CA) have Introduced a bill providing funding for transportation and linking transportation expenditures $23 billion over five years to capitalize the Clean Water SRF.Senator directly to revenues collected into the Federal Highway Trust Fund. George Volnohch(R-OH)has introduced a bill in the Senate to autho- rise S15 billion over five years for the Clean Water SRF. TEA-21 made tremendous strides In closing the gap In unfunded needs, but It did not eliminate It.In a recent report,the U.S.Department of Sustained banding levels in meet the needs will be a key part of this Transportation cited highway needs totaling$61.2 billion annually by year's debate over water Infrastructure legislation.In addition,sources 2009,and public transportation needs of$12.4 billion annually,nearly of funding Including establishment of dedicated sources,plus grants, twice current funding levels.With there Investment requirements,the loans, the condilorm for funding, asset management, management does,of this year's reauthorization debate will be over the amount of practices,eligibility and Davls-Baron provisions—requirements to pay funding authorized In the next bill and revenue sourm to rapport It. prevailing wages for any project funded with federal dollars—all will factor Into the water infrzatrucrure investment debate this year. Representative Don Young(R-AK),who chairs the House hansporta- ban and Infrastructure Committee,(even Increasing Investment by a Tb much It. Fahey, all (202) 408.9541 or send nmatl fo combination of means, Including a motor Mel tax Increase.The Ad- J(aheymnpwa.reet. ministration, however,don not favor a motor Mel tax Increase, and Q prospects for such In the Senate appear uncertain at this time. a.�,� J 4 APWA Reporter Marsh 2003 L1� g�N ��Le� WOefL! As&mfil t. AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING March 26, 2003— 7:00 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, K necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 03/26/03 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for Information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager 1. 30/30 Monthly Update C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on February 26, 2003 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 02/15/03 02/28/03 Totals $10.205,613.94 $5,326,021.63 DIRECTORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving OCSD. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with OCSD. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an Item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 03/26/03 Page 3 - t NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re March 26, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 26, 2003 to be filed. C. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the March 26, 2003 meeting. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re March 5, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 5, 2003 to be filed. C. Receive and file Phase II Biotrickling Filler for Odor Control Demonstration Project Final Report, prepared by University of California, Riverside dated February 2003. d. Receive and file In-plant Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) Impact Study, prepared by Brown and Caldwell, dated November 2002. e. Authorize the General Manager to finalize negotiations and subsequently award a consultant services agreement with Partners Consulting Services, Inc.for Financial Information System Technical Support, Specification No. 5-2002-1101313, in an amount not to exceed $180,000, for the period April 1, 2003 through March 31, 2004 with the option of four additional one year renewals. f. (1) Establish a budget of$230,000 for Treatment Plant No. 2 North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank Replacement providing for the purchase of tanks, associated materials and necessary equipment for the emergency installation of chemical storage tanks; and, (2) Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for Purchase Order No. 37161 issued to Xerxes Corporation for Fiberglass Reinforced Caustic Storage Tanks, Specification No. E-2003-130, for an amount not to exceed $67,000; and, (3) Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23,for Purchase Order No. 37246 issued to Jamison Engineering for North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank and Piping Replacement, Specfiication No. S-2003-131, for an amount not to exceed $89,689. 03/26/03 Page 4 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re March 6, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 6, 2003 to be filed. C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, with Manuel Brothers, Inc., authorizing an addition of$57,085, increasing the total contract amount to$300,585; and (2)Accept Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers, and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13,for additional design engineering services, for an additional amount of $10,890, increasing the total amount not to exceed $142,677. e. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pimie for Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79, providing for additional engineering services for an amount of$192,829, increasing the total amount not to exceed $446,064. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re March 12, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 12, 2003 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2003. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-06, Adopting Policies and Procedures for District's Records Management Program, Records Retention, and Destruction of Obsolete Records, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 02-02. e. (1)Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract for an additional $500,000, increasing the total authorized amount from $1,000,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for the remainder of FY 02/03; and, (2)Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract from $1,000,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,750,000 for FY 03/04. 03/26/03 Page 5 1 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re March 10, 2003 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 10, 2003 to be filed. 16. (1)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the plans and specifications for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers,Job No. P1-76; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a contract to J. R. Filanc Construction Company, Inc.,for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Cladfiers, Job No. P1-76,for an amount not to exceed $33,037,000. 17. (1)Approve plans and specifications for Drain System for North Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-56, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to Ken Thompson, Inc., for Drain System for.North Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-56,for an amount not to exceed $133,050. 18. Approve a license agreement with SWEPI LP to authorize entrance on SWEPI LP's property for design and environmental study purposes related to Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer& Pump Station Abandonment, Contract No. 2-24-1, at no cost to the District, in a form approved by General Counsel. 19. Actions re approval of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Rehabilitation of Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49: 1) Verbal report by Staff; 2) Receive and file Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, prepared by Environmental Science Associates, dated January 23, 2003; and, 03/26/03 Page 6 3)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-07, Making Certain Findings Relating to Less Than Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station; Contract No. 5-49;Approving Mitigation Measures and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; Adopting the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. 20. Verbal report re the Joint Management Committee activities for the SARI Relocation Project, Contract No. 2-41: a. Report of General Manager b. Report of Director of Engineering C. Report of General Counsel d. Receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated March 19, 2003; correspondence from SAWPA dated January 23, 2003 and March 18, 2003; and correspondence from Orange County Sanitation District dated December 3, 2002 and March 6, 2003. 21. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re anticipated litigation, one (1) potential case. (Government Code Section 54956.9(c)) b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, If any, on matters considered in closed session 22. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 03/26/03 -. Page 7 1 23. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 24. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for April 23, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. 25. Adjournments ........................................................................................................................................_-_..........---.........................-.....-..........-... ......_.-......... � :NOTICE TO DIRECTORS:To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of :Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. General Manager Blake Anderson (714)593-7110 banderson(cDocsd.com ;Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714)593-7130 okvle(alocsd.com Director/Engineering David Ludwin (714)593-7300 dludwin0ocsd.com I Director/Financerrreasurer Gary Streed (714)593-7550 gstreedla)ocsd.com I Director/Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714)593-7145 ItomkoAocsd.cam Director/Information Technology Petrick Miles (714)593-7280 omllesnocsd.com ,Director/Operations 8 i Maintenance Bob Dolan (714)593-7020 roolenCalocsd.com iDirectorrrechnical Services Bob Ghirelli (714)593-7400 rahirelliAocsd.00m lAdministrative Services Mgr. Greg Mathews (714)593-7104 amathewsCE ocsd.com ;Communications Services Mgr. Carol Beekman (714)593-7120 cbeekman(d)ocsd.wm !General Counsel Thomas L.Woodruff 714 564-2605 tlw wss-law.co .................................................--..........---...--...--.---.....--.--...-.......--._.-.._-...--_5........)......................---. .... .................-.......... ... In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Board Secretary's office at (714) 593-7130 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to allow the District to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. G:1wp.dtalagenda,Eoard Agendas12003 Board Agendast032603 agenda.doc i � N Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 2003 oJN�y SANITgT�oy 9 � n O y V� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 ° 02/26/03 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on February 26, 2003, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken, Chair Bob Hernandez X Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Leland Wilson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz X Alberta Christy Mike Garda X John Collins Larry Crandall X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Brian Donahue David Shawver X Michael Duvall Karl Lynn Wilson X Norman Z. Eckenmde Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X Alice B. Jempsa Marilynn M. Poe X Tony Kawashima Doug Davert X Beth Krom Christina Shea X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Patsy Marshall Jim Dow X Robert McGowan Richard A. Freschi X Roy Moore John Beauman A Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Don Webb A Jim SiHa Chuck Smfth X Paul Walker Larry Herman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Carol Beekman; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Bob Oaten; Lisa Tomko; OTHERS PRESENT:Thomas L Woodruff, General Counsel; Mike Moore; Layne Barokli; Doug Cook; John Finias; Chuck Hodge; Crain Dunn; Paula Zeller; Bill Knopf; Randy Fuhrman; Don Hughes; Brent Hayes; Dale Harris; Greg Woodside; Ken Ovrey Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 s 02/26/03 3. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Fullerton Don Bankhead Leland Wilson Orange Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz Placentia Norm Eckenrode Constance Underhill PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman commended employees Mike Moore and Layne Baroldi for seeking additional options to manage biosolids. With regard to Agenda Item 13(i), Mr. Fuhrman requested Directors on the PDC Committee to request staff to provide Interim objectives for pathogen reduction. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair McCracken recognized new Director Carolyn Cavecche from the City of Orange. She noted Director Cavecche was assigned to the OMTS Committee. The Chair announced the Finance Department has received two awards during the past month. The California Society of Municipal Finance Officers granted the District its award for Outstanding Financial Reporting for 2001/02 Comprehensive Financial Report to the District. The Governmental Finance Officers Association granted the District Its Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for 2002/03 Budget. Employees Julie Matsumoto and Brad Cagle were commended for their efforts in securing these awards for the District.. It was announced that at the OMTS Committee a special presentation will be given relating to the District's asset management program on Wednesday, March 19, beginning at 5:00 p.m. All Directors are invited to attend. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, announced the District received an award from the Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California, Orange County chapter,for the Groundwater Replenishment System Project. Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, reported the District received an award from the American Society of Civil Engineers for outstanding project achievement for the ocean outfall reballast project. He also recognized Chuck Hodge, Engineer, who led the project team. Bob Cotten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, recognized employees Craig Dunn and Doug Cook for 20 and 25 years of service, respectively. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 ' 02/26/03 Blake Anderson reported that progress continues on 30/30 treatment levels. The District is achieving an average of 36 ppm of suspended solids. Approval of the construction schedule for additional secondary treatment facilities will be considered at the April or May Board meeting. The schedule will also be approved by the EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. In addition, disinfection of the effluent has continued for more than 200 days, and the standards set under AB411 have been consistently met at the ocean outfall's zone of initial dilution. Some improvements are underway to increase reliability to the chlorination system. It was rated that the District has found no adverse impacts to the sea fife in the area around the outfall since the disinfection process began. Furthermore, toxicity testing has been consistently achieved and revealed no problematic areas. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported an invitation was placed in the Directors' meeting folders that evening from the Executive Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCW RP)to attend a meeting on Friday, March 7, at the Sanitation District. The presentation will cover the results of a regional water quality monitoring study over the last five years, from Ventura down to the Mexico border. At the April Board meeting, Mr. Ghirelli stated the final results of the Huntington Beach Bacteria Study will be presented by the leaders of the study team, and a report from the scientific peer review panel that critiqued the work. Following the presentation, a video of the outfall will be shown on both pre and post-disinfection. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel, reported the District has secured the assistance of Assemblyman Ken Maddox to author and introduce AB1427, which will address the issue of state- wide resolution of the biosolids issues and problems. Much work will be required to obtain understanding and support of the members of the State Legislature. Mr.Woodruff referred to the annual litigation status report that was included in the Directors' packages that month. It was also mentioned that a detailed outline was included in the Directors' Board agenda package, as well as in their meeting folders, on changes to the Conflict of Interest provisions of state law. The Steering Committee determined that the existing lists of warrants would be sufficient for checking for individual conflicts. A reminder would also be included on the cover page of the agenda report for the approval of warrants to check for possible conflicts of interest. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held January 22, 2003 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 Y 02/26/03 ALL DISTRICTS 01/15/03 01/31/03 Totals $11,731,699.01 $7,563,337.72 Director John Collins abstained on Warrant No. 50349. Director Mark Leyes abstained on Warrant Nos.49860,50126, 50002, 5068 and 50409. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petitions from property owners requesting annexation of 9.19 acres to Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Orange Park Acres Boulevard in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-04, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-27- Dangler Annexation). NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the February 26, 2003 meeting. Chair McCracken reported that she directed staff to prepare a monthly listing of compensation payments made to Directors for meetings that they have attended on behalf of the District. The governing resolution requires prior approval by the Chair for meeting attendance before compensation can be made. Corrections will be made after-the-fact in the following month's payment cycle. Ms. McCracken also reported that the Ad Hoc Legislative Affairs Committee has been meeting weekly for the past month. This includes a weekly conference call with Eric Saperstein and John Freshman in Washington, DC, and Scott Baugh in Sacramento. Efforts on the federal side have been directed at: (1) getting language from Congress directing EPA to work cooperatively with the District on the permit renewal included within the draft 2003 budget bill to avoid any unreasonable risk of regulatory fines as the District moves towards secondary treatment; and (2) soliciting support within the Orange County's congressional delegation and elsewhere for a$3 million appropriation in fiscal year 2004 to help offset some of the costs for secondary treatment. Chair McCracken stated she would be in Washington, DC in a few weeks and would be meeting with the delegation. She requested other Directors to advise Blake Anderson 0 they were planning trips to Washington, DC so that arrangements through the District's lobbyists could be made for the Directors to meet with their Congress Member about the District's needs. Efforts on the state level include: (1) a biosolids bill, which Assemblyman Ken Maddox has agreed to author to stem the tide of local opposition to land application; and (2) a second bill, ACA 10,that would amend Proposition 218 to extend the exception for Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 ° 02/26/03 Board-adopted fees to include urban run-off(in addition to the existing exception for water, wastewater, and refuse collection fees). Chair McCracken also noted that staff is in the process of hiring someone to seek grants from the state bond propositions. Chair McCracken reported that the General Manager and staff provided updates on the EMT retreat held January 30-31 and February 10; 30/30 secondary treatment levels; disinfection program; discussions with local and county representatives regarding the state budget crises; NPDES permit renewal and negotiation process; and the special presentation at the OMTS meeting to be held on March 19 to discuss the asset management program in more detail. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 18, 2002 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jim Ferryman, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the February 5, 2003 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 5, 2003 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with California Sol] Products to manage a minimum of 100 wet tons per day of the District's biosolids through the production of a Class A biosolids product, increasing the fee from$32.70 per wet ton to$38.62 per wet ton, and providing for land application of Class B biosolids in Arizona for$37,75 per wet ton,for a total annual amount not to exceed $2,550,000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Award a sole source agreement to M.J. Schiff&Associates for Digester Gas Pipeline Corrosion Protection System Inspection and Repair, Specification No. S-2003-1258D,for an amount not to exceed $385,000. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Award a services agreement to J.R. Filanc Construction Company, Inc. for Pump Station Valve Replacement (Rocky Point, Westside and Yorba Linda), Specification No. E-2002-105, for an amount not to exceed $108,351. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Donahue, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the February 6, 2003 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 6,2003 to be filed, as corrected. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 02/26/03 C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$33,527, increasing the total contract amount to$70,879,536. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46, with Ken Thompson, Inc., authorizing an addition of$46,693, increasing the total contract amount to $6,253,819; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 6 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities, authorizing a deduction of$543,817, decreasing the total contract amount to the final contract amount of$5,710,002; and (3) Accept Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 for Natural Gas Line Replacement at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2000.22(REBID), with Atlas-Allied, Inc., authorizing an addition of$20,359 and a time extension of 78 calendar days, Increasing the total contract amount to$205,246; and (2)Accept Natural Gas Line Replacement at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2000-22 (REBID), as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$157,942.17 for Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No.J-40.7, for a total project budget of$750,855.17; and (2) Approve Addendum No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc., for additional engineering services for Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, for an additional amount of$157,942.17, increasing the total amount not to exceed$648,855.17. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services for Phase III of the Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84, providing for additional services and preparation of plans and specifications,for an additional amount of$985,850, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,448,850. Directors Steve Anderson and Mark Leyes opposed. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting for Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer and Pump Station Abandonment, Contract No. 2.24.1,for additional design engineering services,for an additional amount of$75,656, increasing the total amount not to exceed$285,656. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 02/26/03 i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study,Job No. J-40-6, dated November 2002, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve an increase in funding for an additional amount of$87,840, for a total amount of$337,840 for Cooperative Projects Program with the City of Santa Ana, CP-0016, in order to conduct additional flow monitoring and an update to their Master Plan and Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Plan; (2) Approve an increase in District funding to the Cooperative Projects Program for FY2002-03 for an additional amount of$4,604,385, increasing the total program since inception to an amount not to exceed$17,394,388; and (3) Approve time extensions to Cooperative Projects Program contracts with the following cities: La Habra (CP-0108 and CP-0125), Orange (CP-0009, CP-0010, CP-0011 and CP-0012), Santa Ana(CP-0019), and Seal Beach (CP-0110, CP-0111, CP-0112, and CP-0117). 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Brian Brady, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the February 19, 2003 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 19, 2003 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 2003. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Mid-Year Financial Report for the period ending December 31, 2002. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Ouartedy Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No.OCSD 03-05, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve SAFETY-POL-205— Electrical Safety Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. Questions were raised regarding the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report and the report prepared by PIMCO, and the lack of detail regarding the placement of funds. Because the Director of Finance/Treasurer was not in attendance, the General Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 02/26/03 Manager advised staff would agendize the report at the March 12, 2003 meeting for - discussion. 15. DRAFT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair of the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on February 10, 2003. The Chair ordered the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 13, 2003 to be filed. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Effluent Pathogen Reduction Pilot Testing Study,Job No. J-40-6; (2) Approve Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid protest letter from Lanak& Hanna, P.C., on behalf of Sal Power Development, dated February 5, 2003; (4) Receive and file General Counsel's memo dated February 20, 2003: (5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (6)Award a contract to S.S. Mechanical Corporation for Effluent Pathogen Reduction Pilot Testing Study, Job No. J-40-6, for an amount not to exceed $324,387. 17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Defer consideration of adoption of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Rehabilitation of Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49 until March 26, 2003. 18. There was no closed session. Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel, gave a brief update on a pending matter of litigation, Sargent v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 02CC11206. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:27 p.m. 01 Secretary q the Boar :rectors of Orange County Sanit t' n District G1wp.dta\agenda\Board Minutest2003 Board Minutes\022603 minutes.doc Claims Paid From 01/01/03 to 01115/03 r Warrant No. Vender Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 49769 Black 8 Veatch Corporation E 71,761.63 Engineering Services J-77 49770 Brown and Caldwes 75,122.D4 Engineering Services 2-41 &1-98 49771 Carollo Engineers 208,772.82 Professional Services-Mlcrofiltration Demonstration Project 49772 Lee 8 Ro,Inc. 81,631.05 Professional Services 5.49,5.50.5.51 &5-52 49773 Persons Engineering Science,Inc. 81,219.95 Engineering Services J-35-2 49774 Silence Applications Ind.,Corp. 50.440.89 Ocean Monitoring,Meter Mooring,Meter Dale Analysis&Water Quality Survey 49775 Syrlagro Technologies,Inc. 184.380.47 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 49776 SPEC Services,Inc. 30.913.00 Engineering Services P1-89 49777 Tule RanchMagan Farms 144.435.97 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 49778 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 36.433.26 Engineering Service J-67 49779 Ark Construction Company 49,509.00 Construction P7-62 49780 Mike Prlich&Sons 106,283.99 Construction 6.13.2 49761 Urbanlec Engineering,Inc. 43,302.00 Construction J-66 49782 A-Plus Systems 2.440.00 Notices 8 Ada 49783 Able Scale Repair 550.00 Loading Scales Quarterly Inspection 49784 Great American Printing Co. 135.34 Printing 49785 Airgas Safely 923.02 Safety Supplies 49786 Alta-Laval,Inc. 239.54 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49787 American Airlines 1.292.50 Travel Services 49788 American Red Cross 60.00 CPR Training&Misc.Supplies 49789 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 626.00 Lab Paris&Supplies 49790 Aquarium Doctor 1D1.94 Human Resources Aquarium Service 49791 Arch Wireless 1,918.93 Pagers,Service&Ainlme 49792 Awards 8 Trophies Company 305.74 Plaques 49793 AGM Electronics,Inc. 140.77 Electronic Supplies 49794 American Type Culture Collection-ATCC 76.50 Lab Supplies 49795 Baker Tanks 3,918.69 Tank Rentals 49796 Basic Chemical Solutions 285.D5 Bleach 49797 Battery Specialties 218.78 Batteries 49798 BioSpherical Instruments,Inc. 443.16 Instrument Maint. 49799 Sondlogistix,L.L.C. 2.000.00 Prof.Sam.-Preparation of Interim Arbitrage Rebate Repot Series 1993 COPs 49800 Business Week 34.97 Subscription 49801 BC Wire Rape&Rigging 181.12 Mechanical Paris.Supplies&Service 49802 California Barricade Rentals 425.00 Barricade Rentals 49803 Southern California Marine Institute 11.479.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 49804 Calsol,Inc. 557.70 Electrical Parts&Supplies 49805 Carl Warren&Co. 619.77 Insurance Claims Administrator 49W6 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 19,103.60 Professional Services-Anaerobic Selector Study 49807 Charles P,Crowley Co. 149.41 Instrument Parts 49808 Communications Supply Corp. 1.621.54 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 49809 Condition Monitoring Solutions 2,900.00 (2)Colima Laser Alignment Tools 49810 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 306.78 Electrical Supplies 49811 Consolidated Plastics Company 398.91 Lab Parts&Supplies 49812 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,897.04 Plumbing Supplies 49813 Cooper Energy Services 336.66 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49814 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 285.50 Mainl.Agreement-Repair/Installation of Base Handheld&Vehicle Radios 49815 County Wholesale Electric Co. 437.39 Electrical Parts& Supplies Page 1 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01101103 to 01/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 49816 CGvL Engineers 1.236.26 Professional Services PI.94 49817 California Special Districts Association 145.86 Membership 49818 CWEA 92.00 Membership 49819 Dapper Tire Co. 1,526.72 Truck Tires 49820 David's Tree Service 3,300.00 Tree Maint.Service 49821 Del Mar Analytical 540.00 Blosollds Analysis 49622 Diamond H Recognition 27.36 Employee Service Awards 49823 DigiPhoto 11.60 Photographic Services 49824 E.Sam Junes Distributors,Inc. 711.26 Electrical Supplies 49825 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 7.819.00 Medical Screening 49826 Environmental Express 188.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 49827 Environmental Resource Association 391.25 Lab Parts&Supplies 49828 Environmental Sampling Supply,Inc. 242.87 Lab Paris&Supplies 49829 Environmental Science Associates 22,854.58 Professional Services J40-5 49830 Eurotherm Controls 4,460.75 Inst.Pens&Supplies 49831 EPA Tech Transfer Cont.at B of A 100.00 Compliance Training Regisualion 49832 ESRI,Inc. 5,170.37 Software Upgrade&Maintenance 49833 Filter Supply Company 289.93 Fillers 49834 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,075.26 Lab Parts&Supplies 49835 Foodcrafi Coffee&Refreshment Services 404.41 Meeting Supplies 49836 Franklin Covey 78.48 Office Supplies 49837 Gamall-Callahan Company 36.21 Lab Parts&Supplies 49838 George T.Hall 213.76 Electrical Supplies 49839 Goldenwest Window Service 4,103.00 Window Cleaning Service•Spec.N990015 49840 Governing Magazine 16.00 Subscription 49841 W W Grainger,Inc. 6.02 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 49842 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 50.64 Janitorial Supplies 49843 Haaker Equipment Company 118.10 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49844 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 49845 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 301.50 Mechanical Perk&Supplies 49846 Harvard Business Review 118.00 Subscription 49847 Hello Direct,Inc. 283.35 Telephone Headsets 49848 Home Depot 39.33 Small Hardware 49849 Hopkins Technical Products 1.979.73 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49850 Hub Auto Supply 196.77 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 49851 Imaging Express 296.29 Printer Maintenance 49852 Industrial Distribution Group 657.07 Mechanial Parts&Supplies 49853 Information Resources 1,615.00 Human Resources Service-Background Checks 49854 Interstate Battery Systems 544.55 Batteries 49855 Invensys Systems,Inc. 4,473.62 Instrument Supplies 49856 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 425A2 OBsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 49867 Voided Check - 49858 IONIA,Inc. 258.95 Subscription 49859 J.L.Wingert Company 1,250.49 Electrical Supplies 49860 Jays Catering 456.59 Meeting Expenses 49861 John's Philly Grille 157.92 Engineering Meeting Expense 49862 Johnstone Supply 127.84 Electrical Supplies 49863 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 19,206.81 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 Page 2 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01/01103 to 01115/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 49864 Kings County Farm Bureau 276.00 Membership 49865 League Of CA Cities 11,160.00 Administration Meeting Registration&Publications 49866 Lexis-Nerds 23.42 Books&Publications 49867 Lucci's 222.35 Meeting Expense 49868 McMaster-Cam Supply Co. 295.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49869 Mission Uniform Service 2.456.67 Uniform Rentals 49870 NetVersant of Southern California 2,233.09 Human Resources Security System Improvements 49871 The Norco Companies 156.00 Mail Delivery Service 49872 Orange County Treasurers Conference 89.00 Finance Meeting Registration 49873 Parker Supply Company 21.209.31 Mechanical Seal Repair Kits for Headvrorks'C" 49874 Parts Unlimited 316.40 Truck Supplies 49875 Paktol Video Productions 2.192.22 Video 49876 PenValve 57.04 Plumbing Supplies 49877 Pricewalerhouse Coopers,L.L.P. 5.000.00 Forensic Hard Drive Imaging Services 49878 Primary Source 4,665.45 Once Furniture 49879 Primavera Systems,Inc. 3,840.00 Software Maint. 49880 Pump Engineering and/or 0 Air 1,356.68 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 49881 R.W.Beds 17,750.08 Professional Services 5-53.5-54&DAF Area Power Distributor Upgrade 49882 REIF Engineers 4.455.93 Engineering Services 2-24-1 49883 Safety-Kleen 497.20 Parts Washer Lease 8 Service 49884 Seaviswl Consulting,Inc. 9,540.00 Professional Services-Ocean Outfall Instrumentation 49885 Shweluck Sales&Engineering 293.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49886 Supelco,Inc 3.628.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 49887 Smardan Supply Comparry/Orange Coast 55.83 Plumbing Supplies 49888 Southern Mgr Grp,Inc.o/o O'Conrcr Sale 5,351.32 Valves 49889 Spex Certiprep.Inc. 300.45 Lab Parts&Supplies 49890 BARBS 1,295.00 O&M&Compliance Training Registration 49891 SAWPA 3,000.00 Santa Ana River Watershed Group Other Agency Contributions 49892 SKC-West,Inc. 1,085.52 Safety Supplies 49893 Telelrac,Inc. 566.82 Air Time,SoNvare/Hardwara Miami.Contract for Vehicle Tracking System Pitol 49894 Tetra Tech,Inc 15,042.49 Professional Services 11-22 49895 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 115.29 Mechanical Supplies 49896 Tifco Industries 138.30 Electrical Paris&Supplies 49897 Tran Committing Engineers 16,384.44 Engineering Services 5-46&Pt-88 49898 The Trans Company 271.54 Electrical Parts&Supplies 49899 The Unisource Corporation 640.84 Office Supplies 49900 Defense Finance and Accounting 15,765.69 Professional Services J-85-Naval Post-Graduate School 49901 Urban Water Institute,Inc. 400.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 49902 US Equipment Co..Inc. 1,592A8 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49903 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2.369.41 Lab Parts&Supplies 49904 Walden&Associates 5,017.15 Professional Services-Big Canyon Trunk Sewer 49905 Water Policy Report 1,300.00 Subscription 49906 Weather Services International 339.00 Bo/kwere Maintenance 49907 W eMpoa Aparalus DBA Breaker Supply 3,771.25 Electrical Parts&Supplies 49MB WEF-Registration Dept. 1,120.00 Compliance Meeling&Training Registration 499M Xerox Corporation 1,306.02 Fax&Copier Leases 49910 The Yakima Company 863.28 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 49911 Jean L.Betienhausen 1,029.69 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement Page 3 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01/01/03 to 01/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 49912 Corma M.Chaudhry 1,037.20 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 49913 Jeffrey T.Reed 1,678.68 Meelirg/freining Expense Reimbursement 49914 Julian F.Setif 1,209.70 Meeling/fraining Expense Reimbursement 49915 Robert J.Taylor 191.18 MeetirgrTmining Expense Reimbursement 49916 Tadao G.Vitko 179.93 Meeling/fraining Expense Reimbursement 49917 Orange County Sanitation District 1,137.73 Petty Cash Reimb. 49918 PRSA-Orange County Chapter 235.00 Membership 49919 Blue Cross of California 272,287.43 Medical Insurance Premium 49920 Coral Energy Resources,L.P. 87,976.17 Natural Gas 49921 Orange County Sanitation District 657,120.00 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 49922 Southern California Edison 76,717.06 Power 49923 Retarder Bankers Security Life Ins, 28,478.23 Employee Life Ins.Premium,Short-Tenn Disability 8 Cancer Ins.Payroll Deductions 49924 Airgas Safety 68.65 Safety Supplies&Tads 49925 AT&T Universal Biller 3,345.24 Telephone Service 49926 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 84.70 Telephone Service 49927 Bavco 77.66 Mechanical Supplies 49928 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 49929 California Industrial Supplies 1,054.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49930 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 49931 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 502.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49932 CALPELRA 460.00 Membership-Calif.Public Employers Labor Relations Association 49933 Electra-Bond 107.21 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 49934 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc 7.490.37 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 49935 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 49936 FBeNET Corporation 24.032.00 Software Maintenance Contract-EOMS 49937 First American Real Estate Solutions 3,013.10 Orange County Properly Information 49938 Franchise Tax Board 337.21 Wage Garnishment 49939 City of Huntington Beach 15.538.73 Water Use 49940 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 49941 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 3,246.21 Dues Deduction 49942 Irvine Ranch Water District 271.09 Water Use 49943 League Of CA Cities 97.74 Administration Meeting Registration 49944 MarVac Electronics 16A7 Electrical Paris&Supplies 49945 Morgan Company 226.20 Auto Parts&Supplies 49946 National Bond&Trust 1,462.57 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 49947 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 3.500.00 Custom Centrifugal Pump Training 49948 City of Newport Beach 146.42 Water Use 49949 OCEA 515.36 Dues Deduction 49950 Pacific Bell 1,286.09 Telephone Services 49951 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1.693.83 Plumbing Supplies 49952 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 49953 Court Omer 296A0 Wage Garnishment 49954 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,251.00 Dues Deduction 49955 PenValve 25.33 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 49956 RMS Systems,Inc. 824.00 Software Maintenance 49957 Signature Awards 1,413.67 Bronze Flagpole Plagues 49958 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 49959 Southern California Water 66.38 Wale,Use Page 4 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01/01103 to 01/15103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 49960 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 49961 Vallen Safety Supply Company 2.481.90 Safety Supplies 49962 Vedzon Calaorno 1,432.29 Telephone Services 49963 Conn Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment 49964 Williams.Daniel R. 327.75 Reconciliation User Fee Program 49965 W EF-Registration Dept. 475.00 O&M Meeting Registration 49966 Shabbir S.Dermal 246.50 Meeting/frsining Expense Reimbursement 49967 Marc A.Brov n 232.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 49968 James E.Colston 239.35 Meeling/frainkng Expense Reimbursement 49969 Deborah L.Lindel 1.394.62 Meelirg/Trammi;Expense Reimbursement 49970 Peter M.Morrison 667.01 MeetiugRrainug Expense Reimbursement 49971 Canh O.Nguyen 1,180.67 Meeting/Treining Expense Reimbursement 49972 ADS Environmental Services,Ine 134.639.87 Professional Services J-73-2 49973 ASAP Software Express 165.077.27 Solhvare Maintenance Agreement 49974 Basic Chemical Solutions 31.889.48 Sodium Sisulfite 49975 Black&Veatch Corporation 373,958.53 Engineering Services P2-85&J-87 49976 Boyle Engineering Corporation 73,595.08 Engineering Services 1.24 49977 Brown and Cakiwell 136,901.67 Engineering Services 241 If CMOMANDR Program 49978 Cardiac Science,Inc. 34,729.61 Software 49979 Carollo Engineers 746,916.91 Professional Services Pl-6D,P2-60,P2-66,&J-87 4998D Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 28,539.11 Cationic Polymer 49981 IPMC do Parsons 426,739.58 Professional Services-Project Management Program 49982 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 45.367.26 Construction-STOOSR Pumps,Asphalt&SSO Training Facility 49983 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 42,256.76 Medical Insurance Premium 49984 Kemkon Pacific,Inc 282,355.18 Ferric Chloride MO 9-77-95 49985 Ken Thompson,Inc. 25,191.80 Cons wdion-Manhole&Pipe Fittings at Newport Bay 49986 Kforce Professional Staging 36.545.55 Temporary Employment Services 49967 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 48,388.50 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99 49988 Oracle Corp 43,692.23 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 49989 Pacific Ford 30,643.02 (1)2003 Ford E-350 Commuter Vans 49990 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 136,910.92 Engineering Services J42 49991 Parsons Infrastructure&Tech.Group 58,166.27 Professional Services-Asset Management Program 49992 Partners Consulting Services 41,400.00 On-See FIS Support-One-World Migration Project 49993 Paulus Engineering,Inc 25.930.00 ConsWction-Street Repairs 49994 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 289,378.31 Sodium Hylwchlorite 49995 So.Cal.Gas Company 27,020.57 Natural Gas 49996 SPEC Services,Inc 25,826.32 Engineering Services J-33.1 &P2-66 49997 The Lewis Group 37,425.00 Consulting Service-Capital Project Management Process 49998 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 111,937.79 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 49999 U.S.Peroxide 402.490.78 Hydrogen Peroxide 50000 Webster Environmental Associates,Inc. 46,607.50 Professional Services-Oxygen Ionization Study 50001 Green Giant Landscape,Inc. 71,681.00 Construction P2-84 60002 J.F.Shea Construction,Inc. 108,671.45 Construction J-35-1 5DO03 Manuel Bras.,Inc. 33.525.00 Construction-Fiber Optics Extension at Pit.2 500D4 Margate Construction,Inc. 2,365,721.00 Construction PlS7 MODS Steve P Rados,Inc. 532,648.57 Construction 1.24 50006 Union Bank of California 59.183.17 Construction 1-24,Retention MOD7 Orange County Sanitation District 28,957.74 Workers Comp.Reimb. Page 5 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01101/03 to 01115103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50008 Acroprinl Time Recorder Company 26.00 Stationery&Off"Supplies 60009 Advanced Cooling Technologies 585.00 Repairs&Maintenance Service 50010 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 229.32 Lab Paris&Supplies 50011 Air Liquids America Corp. 434.85 Specialty Gasses 50012 Airborne Express 16.82 Air Freight 5D013 Airgas-West 163.25 Lab Paris&Supplies 50014 Airgas Safety 1,138.01 Safety Supplies&Equipment 60015 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 19.80 Mechanical Supplies SM16 Alta-Robbins,Inc. 354.92 Instrument Supplies 50017 American Chemical Society 123.00 Membership 50018 American Safety Products Co. 163.44 Lab Parts&Supplies 50019 American Society For Microbiology 119.00 Membership 60020 Appleone Employment Service 742AO Temporary Employment Services 50021 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc 2,595.0D Toxicity Testing 50022 Associated Vacuum Tech.,Inc. 148.59 Filters 50D23 AssurX,Inc. 11.500.00 CATSWEB Software 50024 Atlantis Pod Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 50025 Axeda Systems.Inc 6,364.58 @aGLANCE Professional Edition Software.Maintenance&Support 50026 ARBIPERP-Air Resources Board 270.00 Portable Equipment Permit Fee 50027 ASI Robison do Penton Industries 2,182.44 Equipment Maintenance 50D28 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 46.28 Telephone Service SM29 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3.535.66 Cellular Telephone Service 50030 AT&T Wireless Services 2.952.42 Wireless Phone Services 50031 AWSI 216.00 Department of Transporlalion Training Program 50032 Baker Tanks 5.762.89 Tank Rentals 50033 Battery Specialties 669.78 Batteries 50034 Bauer Compressors 1,934.11 Mechanical Parts,Tools&Supplies 50035 BearCom 566.77 Communication Supplies 50036 Bell Land Surveying 4,917-73 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 50037 Bentley Systems,Inc. 14.69 Subscription 50038 BioMerieux V6ek,Inc. 1.028.37 Lab Supplies 50039 Brenntag West,Inc. 1,705.66 Janitorial Supplies 50D40 Brinkman Instruments.Inc. 2,226.55 Lab Parts&Supplies 50041 C.S.M.F.O 100.00 Membership 50042 Cal-Glass,Inc. 35.02 Lab Parts&Supplies 50043 Calif Centrifugal Pump 15.319.64 Turbine Pump Rebuild 50044 California Industrial Supplies 537.40 Tools 50D45 California Relocation Services,Inc 455.63 Office Moving Services 50046 Martin Boyer Co.,Inc.Go Cambridge Int. 4,166.66 Prof.Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 50047 Cardlock Fuels 1.354.48 Gasoline 50048 Center for Creative Growth 6,000.00 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 50049 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1.650.73 Valve 50050 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 216.05 Stationery&Office Supplies 50051 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 4,900.00 Safety Training-High Flow Exercise 50052 Compressor Components of California 1.248.00 Clean,Test&Rebuild 32 Coils 50053 Conex International,Inc. 2.200.00 Professional Services P2.60 50054 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 9.084.11 Electrical Supplies 50055 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 4,788.51 Plumbing Supplies Page 6 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01101103 to 01/15/03 e Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50066 Continental Graphics 31.69 Printing 50057 Corporate Express 2,561.76 Office Supplies 50058 Conech Engineering 17,574.03 (1)Chopper Pump SM69 Cost Containment Solutions 1.238.36 Worker's Comp.Services 50060 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 2,276.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50061 County Wholesale Electric Go. 705.04 Electrical Parts&Supplies 50062 Cover-All 1,000.00 Engineering Structure Calculations 50063 Culligan of Orange County 369.76 Maim.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener System 50064 CASA 1,625.00 Administration Meeting Registration 50065 CGvL Engineers 6.065.98 Professional Services P1-94 50D66 CISCO Systems 852.00 Software Maint.Agreement 50067 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 781.87 Lab Parts&Supplies 50068 CR&R,Inc. 1,062.93 Container Rentals 50069 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 750.00 Lab Analysis 50070 David's Tree Service 6,225.00 Tree Maint.Service 50071 Del Mar Analytical 1,298.00 Blosolids Analysis 50072 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 2,927.57 Server Maintenance Contract 50073 Department Of General Services 667.99 Cooperative Purchasing Program-Calif.Multiple Award Services Discount Fee 50074 Diamond H Recognition 746.13 Employee Service Awards 50075 DigiPhoto 25.69 Photographic Services 50076 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 703.67 Paint Supplies 50077 E.Sam Jones Dishibutare,Inc. 1,894.07 Electrical Supplies 50078 Ecology Control Industries 9,410.28 Hazardous Waste Disposal 50079 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 136.00 Medical Screening 50080 Emergency Management NeNmrk,Inc. 6,600.00 Fire Extinguisher Safety&Use Training 5OD81 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 593.80 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care SOD82 Employers Group 4,400.00 On-She Training-Change.Con0ict,&Communications Management Classes 50083 Enchanter,Inc 2,700.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 50D94 Environmental&Occupational Risk Mgmt 2,436.41 Prof.Svrs.-Comprehensive Noise Survey at Pits. 1 &2 50D85 Environmental Resource Association 75.00 DMROA Toxicity Study Reporting Fee 50086 Pacific States Chemical,Inc. 1,757.00 Hydrarhlodc Acid 50087 ENS Resources.Inc. 17,163.87 Professional Services- Legislative Advocate 50088 FedEx Corporation 431.65 Air Freight 50089 Fllarsky&We%L.L.P. 3,182.50 Professional Services,Labor Negoliatlon Services with Bargaining Groups 5009D First American Real Estate Solutions 348.80 Orange County Property Information 50091 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 11,949.55 Lab Parts&Supplies 50092 Flat and Vedlcal.Inc. 405.00 Concrete Cutting 50093 Flo-Systems,Inc. 542.58 Pump Supplies 60094 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 409.84 Meeting Supplies 50095 Foss Environmental 3,881.62 Tank Cleaning Services 50096 Fountain Valley Camera 53.23 Photo Supplies 50097 Franklin Covey 986.82 Office Supplies 50098 Frost Engineering Service Go. 1,045.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50099 G.E.Supply 77.45 Electric Paris 50100 Garb Illustration 845.00 Professional Services-OCSD Websits Design 50101 Garrall-Callahan Company 5.593.19 Chemicals 50102 Gastech 292.46 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 50103 George Yardley Co. 465.48 Valve Page 7 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claim Paid From 01101103 to 01/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50104 WW.Grainger.Inc. 574.15 Padlocks 50105 Graybar 21.588.74 Computer SoftwarelHardware Upgrade 50106 Gyms Systems 4.999.00 Software Maintenance 50107 Harald Primrose Ice 55.50 Ice For Samples 60108 Health Science Associales 1,935.50 Effluent Pump Station Annex Lead Sampling(J-77) 60109 Hello Direct,Inc. 285.35 Telephone Headsets 50110 Hill Brothers 22.759.65 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 50111 Hoeibiger Service.Inc. 1,168A3 Valves 50112 Home Depot 121.01 Small Hardware 50113 Hub Aida Supply 299.23 Automotive Parts&Supplies 50114 HST Software 357.00 Software Upgrade 50115 Idexx 2.678.67 Lab Paris&Supplies 50116 Imaging Express 111.06 Printer Maintenance 50117 Industrial Distribution Group 1,836.76 Master locks 50118 Industrial Metal Supply 93.94 Metal 50119 Industrial Threaded Products.Inc. 2,322.38 Fasteners 50120 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 60.83 Lab Parts&Supplies 60121 Interstate Battery Systems 399.81 Batteries 50122 forestek Computer,Inc. 5,5D0.00 Network&Server Maintenance 50123 Irvine Technology Corporation 12,000.00 Temporary Employment Services 50124 IEEE-Institute for Economic&Environ. 25.00 Publication 50125 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 2,148.99 Specially Gases 50126 Jay's Catering 1,390.70 Meeting Expenses 50127 Joe Rhodes Maintenance Services,Inc. 150.00 Mainl.Agreement-OCSD Fuel Management System 50128 Johnstone Supply 331.95 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 50129 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 16.095.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 50130 Kelly Paper 107.51 Paper 50131 KW Communications Consulting 662.50 Community Outreach Re Sushard Trunkline Replacement Project 50132 Lab Support 1,657.75 Temporary Employment Services 50133 League Of CA Cities 1,050.00 Membership 50134 Linjer Company clo Gerald Jones 9,023.90 Professional Service-DART NO 9-22-99 60135 Luccl's 329.70 Meeting Expense 60136 Lustre-Cal 665.36 Waste Hauler Decels 50137 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 8,937.48 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 50138 Management Technologies 300.00 Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit 50139 Manalt Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 6.000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 50140 Matrix Industries,Inc. 1,750.00 Construction-Remove/Dispose of Drywall&Patch Fabric on Boilers at Pit.2 50141 Mcfunkin Corporation 75.99 Plumbing Supplies 50142 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 356.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50143 Mac Anslyfical System 8,725.00 Toxicity Analysis 50144 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 1,082.13 Mechanical Seal Repairs 50145 Medlin Controls Co. 1,157.18 Instrument Supplies 50146 Michael Turnipseed&Associates 4,498.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 50147 Micro Motion,Inc. 2,888,09 Instrument Repairs&Maintenance Service 50148 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 662.60 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance Service 50149 Mlnarik 1.219.36 Instrument Supplies 50150 Mission Uniform Service 6.521.44 Uniform Rentals 50151 Myers Power Products,Inc. 84.13 Electrical Supplies Page 8 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01/01103 to 01115103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50152 MD8 Consulting 6,676.80 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 50153 MSA do Mag Systems 772.23 Instrument Parts 8 Supplies 50154 N.Glantz 8 Son 333.25 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 50166 National Plant Services,Inc. 8,007.60 Vacuum Truck Services 50166 Neal Supply Co. 1,712.91 Plumbing Supplies 50157 NeNersant of Southern California 1.338.72 Maintenance Services-Human Resources Security System 50166 Nexlel Communications 3,661.26 Cellular Phones B Air Time 50159 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 179.17 Crosses 50160 Ninyo 6 Moore Corporate Accounting 3,109.47 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 50181 The Norco Companies 312.00 Mall Delivery Service 50182 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 54.95 Asset Tags 50183 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,189.84 OfSce Supplies 50164 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 636.26 Instrument Parts 8 Supplies 5D165 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment,Inc. 181.75 Fuel Pump Equipment 50166 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 276.07 Mechanical Paris 8 Supplies 50167 Ortiz Flee Protectlon 785.00 Construcion-Modifications to Fire Sprinkler System in Blegs.5 6 6 50168 Oved Degan Construction Co. 20,760.04 Consoudion J-90 50169 Oxygen Service Company 2,178.37 Specially Oases 50170 OCB Reprographics 1,413.46 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 60171 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 795.41 Electrical Supplies 50172 Pacific Bell 88.44 Telephone Services 50173 Pacific Bell Internet Services 329.01 Internet Service 50174 Parkhouse Tire Co. 2,300.14 Time 50175 Parts Unlimited 491.35 Automotive Parts B Supplies 50176 Patriot Video Productions 2D4.91 Video 50177 Program Planning Professionals 24,112.50 Installation 8 Configuration of Microsoft Project Server 50178 PenVelve 1,018.30 Plumbing Pans 8 Supplies 5017g The Perkin Elmer Corp. 2,533.16 Lab Parts,Supplies 8 Repairs 50180 Power Bros.Machine,Inc. 305.36 Mechanical Repairs 8 Maintenance Service 60181 Primary Source 1,398.06 Office Furniture 50182 Projects Partners 4,490.77 Temporary Employment Services 60163 Prolech Petroleum Services,Inc. 5,858.84 Replacement of Veeder Root Tank Monitor Panel 60184 PCS Express 220.00 Courier Service 50185 R.W.Beck 1,502.30 Professional Services P1-90 50188 Lawrence Ragan Communications.Inc 179.00 Communications Meeting Registration 50187 Rainin Instrument Co.,Inc. 532.38 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 50188 Reall Systems Corporation 6,531.25 Software Revision Services 50189 Red Wing Shoes 174.12 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 50190 Regents of Univ.of California 23.932.62 Professional Services J-85 50191 RemedyTemp,Inc. 796.02 Temporary Employment Services 50192 Rlmh Business System 2.594.62 Densllometer 50193 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems 676.77 SollwareMardware Maintenance 50194 Ryan Herce Products Corp. 482.49 Valve 50195 RM Controls 38.91 Instrument Supplies 50196 RPM Electric Motors 3.345.42 Electrical,Parts,Supplies 8 Repairs 50197 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 4,200.OD Construction-Manhole Repairs 50198 Schwing America.Inc. 150.46 Pump Supplies 50199 Science Applications Ing.Corp. 8.896.09 Professional Services PI-85 Page 9 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01101/03 to O1/15103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50200 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 1.917.91 Specialty Gases 60201 See-Bird Electronics,Inc. 766.00 Lab Maintenance&Service 50202 Shurelurk Sales&Engineering 1,793.67 Plastic Sheeting 50203 Smith-Emery Company 3.974.00 Soil Testing M07-13-94 50204 So6View Computer Products 464.77 OKcs Supplies 50205 SoaChoice 27.27 Software 50206 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 2,252.76 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 502D7 Southern California Edison 2.136.29 Power 50208 Sperling Inst.clo Patten Corporate 5,246.72 (2)Flow Meters 50209 Sunset Ford 24.46 Automotive Paris&Service 50210 Sunset Industrial Paris 193.47 Mechanical Supplies 50211 Super Power Products 1,293.00 Janitorial Supplies 50212 By Nielson Service,Inc 960.00 Lab Calibration Service 50213 Symms-TSG 1,384.18 SCADA System VAX Service Maintenance Agreement 50214 BARBS 926.00 Engineering Training Registration 50215 SAWPA 1,000.00 Santa Ana River Watershed Group Other Agency Contributions 50216 SPI Dynamics,Inc. 5,100.00 Software 50217 SPX Valves&Control 6,460.16 Valves&Mechanical Parts 60218 Taylor-Dunn 710.49 Electric Cart Parts 50219 Tetra Tech,Inc. 3.973.32 Professional Services 7.37 50220 The City of Greeley 15.00 Video 50221 Themes Finnigan,L.L.C. 226.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 50222 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 915.80 Mechanical Supplies 50223 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,736.00 Elevator Maintenance 50224 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 50225 Daily Pilot 56.26 Notices&Ads 50226 Ton,Donald 141.00 Meelingrtmining Expense Reimbursement 50227 Tonys Lock&Safe Service&Sales 154.75 Locks&Keys 50228 The Training Clinic 798.00 Human Resources Training Registration 50229 Transcat 4.504.35 Dry Block Calibrator 50230 Tree of Life Nursery 6,655.77 Construction P2-84 50231 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 10,949.13 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 50232 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 56.58 Automotive Supplies 50233 Truesdall Laboratories,Inc. 2,520.00 Lab Services 50234 Teksystems 7,374.00 Temporary Employment Services 50235 US Filter Corporation 1.099.00 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 50236 U.S.Metro Group.Inc. 24,785.0D Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 50237 Ultra Scientific 97.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 50238 The Unisource Corporation 212.43 Office Supplies 50239 United Parcel Service 937.76 Parcel Services 50240 Universal Specialties,Inc. 3,885.95 Plumbing Supplies 50241 UC Regents 1.120.00 Human Resources Training Registration 50242 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 1,782.21 Electrical Parts&Supplies 50243 US Filler Westates Carbon 4,530.04 Carbon Filters&Disposal Service 50244 Vallen Safety Supply Company 90.92 Prof.Sam.-Troubleshoot Hardware/Software Problems&Optimize 27 Scrubbers 50245 Vapex,Inc. 5,816.5D Hardware/Software Support&Maint. 50246 Varian Associates,Inc 76.85 Lab Paris&Supplies 50247 Verizon California 552.50 Telephone Services Page 10 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01/01103 to 01/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50248 Veme's Plumbing 50.00 Service Contract-Testing&Can,BackOow Devices at Plls. 1 &2&Pump Sta. 50249 Village Nurseries 75.38 Landscaping Supplies 60250 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 82828 Lab Paris If Supplies 50251 The Wackenhut Corporation 17,953.38 Security Guards 50252 Waste Markets Corp. 21,226.03 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Men.Removal 50253 Waters Corporation 899.72 Lab Pans&Supplies 50254 Waxie Sanitary Supply 686.85 Janitorial Supplies 50255 Weather&Wind Instrument Go. 1,026.78 Wino Socks 50256 Weber Scientific 1,485.02 Lab Pans&Supplies 60257 Westmark Paint Co. 299.50 Painting Supplies 50258 Arthur Wolfson Ph.D 4.933.40 Professional Services-NPDES Permit Renewal 50259 WoaoalWork 925.00 Human Resources Training Registration 50260 WEF 134.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 50261 Xerox Corporation 14.697.13 Copier Leases,Buyout,Equipment Mainlenance&Office Supplies 50262 XESyslems,Inc. 302.50 Soflware/Haroware Maintenance 50263 The Yakima Company 23.256.72 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 50264 Aas-Alied,lnc. 9.680.00 Construction-Natural Gas Line Replacement 50265 California Bank&Trust 2.620.00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention 50266 J W Contracting Corporation 18,809.00 Construction P2-60 50267 Southern Contracting Company 23,576.00 Construction J-33-1A 50268 Union Bank of California 5,201.DD Construction P2-60,Retention 50269 Kathleen T.Millea 703.55 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 50270 Employee Activity Committee 170.00 Service Award Expense SM71 Miller,Stephen 1,051.20 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks SM72 Orange County Sanilation District 282.37 Petty Cash Reimb. 50273 Smith,Mallhew 2,847.14 Employee Computer Loan Program 5D274 Vallone,Joseph&Dell Computer Corp. 2.635.30 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 10,520,165.53 Payroll Disbursements 28759.28904 Employee Paychecks S 170,341.05 Biweekly Payroll 01108103 28905-28928 Interim Paychecks 41,029.76 Annual Payouts BM96-81175 Direct Deposit Statements 837,387.62 Brvreekh Payroll01/08103 Total Payroll Disbursements S 1.048.758.44 yYre Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Tens.National Association 39,834.22 December Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas,National Association 122,940.82 Societe Generale November Swap Payment on 1993 Cenifiates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments S 162,775.04 Total Claims Paid 01/01103-01115/03 & 11,731,699.01 Page 11 of 11 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 01116/03 to 01131/03 Warrant No. Venda Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 50275 American Express $ 30.877.25 Purchasing Card Program.Misc.Supplies&Services 50276 Orange County Sanitation District 585.445.83 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 502T7 Southern California Edison 82.339.26 Power 50278 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 35,272.DD Temporary Employment Service 50279 Voided Check - - SD280 Mike Prlich&Sons 34.975.00 Construction 6.13-2 50281 Agilerd Technologies,Inc. 156.54 Lab Parts If Supplies 50282 Air Colo Supply,A Ferguson Enterprise 761.11 Air Conditioner Supplies 50283 Aigas Safety 1,1T7.79 Safety Supplies 50284 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 231.30 Telephone Service 50285 AT&T Wheless Services-Airtime 57.75 Cellular Telephone Service 50286 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 50287 Cad Warren If Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 50288 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 50289 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 161.67 Electrical Supplies 50290 CASA 11.850.00 Membership 50291 CWEA-TCP 41.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 50292 Electra-Bond.Inc 996.69 Fusion Bantling Service 50293 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 7,705.37 Re6nbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 50294 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 50295 Franchise Tax Board 333.48 Wage Garnishment 50296 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 2,743.71 Removal and Replacement&Testing of(5)Control Systems on Cooper Engines 60297 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 Wage Garnishment 50298 Ind.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,249.75 Duals Deduction 60299 from Mountain 300.00 Bid Documents Storage Fee-P1-37&J-39 50300 Irvine Ranch Water District 27.69 Water Use 50301 Knowledge Point 2,424.38 Software Maim. 60302 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 1.800.00 Human Resources Agreement for Special Training Services 50303 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1.633.02 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50304 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 2.850.00 Repairs&Maint.Services-High Rate Mixing Pump 50305 National Bond&Trust 1.462.57 U.S.Savings Bands Payroll Deductions 50306 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 278.68 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 50307 Oxygen Service Company 102.40 Specialty Gases 50308 OCFA 515.36 Dues Deduction 50309 Pacific Bell 19.93 Telephone Services 50310 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 60311 Court Order 295.00 Wage Garnishment 50312 Peace Officers Council of CA 1.305.00 Dues Deduction 50313 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 2,800.44 Lab Instrument Parts If Service 50314 Photometry International Corp. 5.000.00 Software Maintenance-Phctometrry 50315 Risk&Insurance 29.95 Subscription 50316 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 52.38 Paint Supplies 50317 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1,535.90 Safety Supplies 50318 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 206.03 Mechanical Pans&Supplies SD319 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 50320 SoftChoice 5.065.79 Sofhrare 50321 Slate Board of Equalization 330.92 Unleaded Diesel Fuel&Lube Oil Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 01116103 to 01131/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50370 Wyndham International 33,074.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 50371 Air Products&Chemicals 25.758.02 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO M-89 50372 A-Cal(Assoc.Calibration,Inc.) 105.00 Calibration of Concrete Test Hammer 50373 Advanced Cooling Technologies 850.00 Air Conditioning Service 60374 Agllent Technologies,Inc. 26.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 50375 Airgas Safely 3.630.41 Safety Supplies,Repairs&Certification 50376 Analysts,Inc. 513.30 Testing Kits 50377 Appleone Employment Service 15,351.24 Temporary Employment Services 50378 Arch Wireless 2,172.80 Pagers,Service B Airllme 50379 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 55.51 Telephone Service 50380 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,630.20 Cellular Telephone Service 60381 AT&T Wireless Services 2,939.76 Wireless Phone Services 60382 Battery Specialties 347.55 Batteries 5D383 Bush&Associates,Inc. 3.496.00 Surveying Services MO 645-97 50384 C.T.Bathala,PhD.,P.E. 1.387.60 Professional Services 2.41 50385 CBI-Glass,Inc. 103.98 Lab Parts&Supplies 50386 California Automatic Gate 1,008.81 Gate Repairs&Maintenance Services 50387 California Relocation Services,Inc. 67.50 Office Moving Services 50388 Callrol,Inc. 122.21 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50389 C8112CeII 1,87C31 Communication Equipment 50390 Charles P.CrovAsy Co. 140.28 Freight 60391 City of Fullerton 860.00 Manhole Raising 50392 Olyof Tustin 2.100.00 Manhole Raising 50393 Coast Rubber Stomp,Mfg. 892.06 Stationery&Office Supplies 50394 Conex lntemelional 990.00 Professional Services P2-60 50395 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 5.926.25 Electrical Supplies 60396 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 2.858.43 Plumbing Supplies 50397 Corporate Express 1.600.04 Office Supplies 50398 Corlech Engineering 3.979.00 Pump&Pump Supplies 50399 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 1,992.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50400 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 571.50 Main.Agreement-RepabAnstallalion of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios 50401 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 183.06 Mainl.Agreement-Repair/Installation of Base.Handheld&Vehicle Radios 50402 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 285.00 Sever Service Fee Administration 50403 County Wholesale Electric Co. 101.21 Electrical Parts&Supplies 50404 Crane America Services,Inc. 3,039.41 Crane Services W405 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 MamL Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener System 60406 CGVL Engineers 661.50 Professional Services PI-94 50407 CH2M Hill 20.087.94 Professional Services J•10-6 50408 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 10.930.15 Cationic Polymer 50409 CR&R,Ina 945.00 Container Rentals 50410 CWEA 340.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 50411 CWEA Membership 423.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 60412 Dapper Tire Co. 1,349.08 Truck Tires 50413 David's Tree Service 7,485.00 Tree Maint.Service 50414 Del Mar Analytical 1,250.00 Biosolids Analysis 50415 Diamond H Recognition 26.84 Employee Service Awards 50416 Dickscn's,Inc. 1,778.66 Electrical Supplies 513417 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 16.16 Electrical Supplies Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 01116103 to 01131/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50418 Norman Eckenrode 447.36 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 5D419 Edinger Medical Group.Inc. 250.00 Medical Screening 50420 Electro-Test,Inc. 375.00 Electrical Acceptance Testing-P2-60 50421 Employers Group Service Corp. 5,000.00 Or Site Training Services SN22 Enchanter,Inc. 6,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.24-95 50423 Environmental Science Associates 1,695.81 Professional Services J40-6 50424 Pacific Slates Chemical,Inc 1,212.51 Hydrochloric Acid 50425 Excel Door&Gate Company,Inc. 751.95 Maintenance&Repair Services 50426 FedEx Corporation 316.92 Air Freight SD427 First American Real Estate Solutions 304.35 Orange County Property Information 50428 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 2.903.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 50429 Flow Science,Inc. 6.000.00 Professional Services-Hydraulic Testing 50430 Foodcra8 Coffee&Refreshment Services 194.72 Meeting Supplies 50431 Foss Environmental 4.999.80 Caustc Tank Cleaning 50432 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 340.80 Truck Wash Tickets 5D433 Franklin Covey 65.46 Office Supplies 50434 FTI,Inc. 347.99 Stationary It Office Supplies 50435 Garb Illustration 1,625.00 Professional Illustrator Services-Ocean Durall Diagram 50436 Garland Manufacturing Co. 1.380.88 Mechanical Part It Supplies 50437 Garrau-Callahan Company 1.621.42 Chemicals SM38 General Petroleum 11.820.98 Unleaded Gasoline 50439 George T.Hall 296.48 Electrical Supplies 50440 George Yardley Co. 240.28 Valve 50441 Getinge Castle 516.00 Lab Instrument Maintenance&Repairs Service 50442 Golden Bell Products 1,080.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coaling of Manholes 50443 W W Grahger,Inc. 1,097.38 Electrical Parts&Supplies 50444 Haakm Equipment Company 5,624.17 Automotive Pans&Repair Service 50445 American Sigma,Inc. 366.19 Lab Paris&Supplies 50446 Harbor Truck Bodies 699.21 Auto Body Repairs-V454 50447 Harbour Engineering Group 15.760.73 (4)Gould Pump Impellers SO448 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 50449 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 395.01 Valves 50450 Hill Brothers 22.747.03 Chemicals-Dow&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 5D451 The Holman Group 848.88 Employee Assistance Program Premium 50452 Home Depot 608.81 Repair It Maintenance Materials 50453 Hopkins Technical Products 635.46 Pump Supplies 504M Hub Auto Supply 400.41 Automotive Pans&Supplies 50455 City of Huntington Beach 15,509.88 Water Use 5D456 Idexx 1.336.10 Lab Pans&Supplies 50457 Industrial Distribution Group 4,151.34 Electrical Parts&Supplies 50458 Interstate Battery Systems 600.59 Batteries 50459 Intratek Computer,Inc. 1,860.00 NeWrk&Server Maintenance 50460 Iran Mountain Off-Site Dale Protection 212.71 Offsile Back-Up Tape Storage for NIT Server 50461 Irvine Ranch Water District 19.90 Water Use 50462 IBM Corp. 2,672.32 Hardware Maintenance-IBM Magstar Magnetic Tape System 50463 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 507.91 Inspection&Recertification Services-Winch Tripod 50464 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Company 500.00 Accounting Training Registration 50465 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 2.300.52 Construction-Remove&Replace Concrete Sidewalk on s/s of Admin.Bldg. Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT B - 1 Claims Paid From 01116103 to 01131103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50466 Johnstone Supply 791.03 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 50467 Kaman Industrial Technologies 6.15 Mechanical Supplies 50468 Kforce Professional Staffing 10.572.50 Temporary Employment Services 50469 KNF Neuberger,Inc. 1.040.65 Lab Parts&Supplies 50470 KW Communications Consulting 1.697.57 Community Outreach Re Bushard Tmnklee Replacement Project 50471 Lob Support 4.949.00 Temporary Employment Services 50472 Lifecom-Safety,Inc. 49.50 Calibration&Repair of Odor Control Equipment 50473 Linjer Company clo Gerald Jones 4.414.90 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 50474 Lucd's 301.90 Meeting Expense 50475 MacAulay,Nicholas 327.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 50476 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 2,523.16 Executive Disability Plan Premium 60477 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,073.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 5D478 Mec Analytical System 2,100.00 Toxicity&Grain Size Analyses 50479 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 1,006.67 Mechanical Seal Repair SD480 Media Clips,Inc. 35.00 Notices&Ads 50481 Met-Pro CorplSearce Div. 1,429.75 Pump&Pump Supplies 50482 Minitab,Ix. 750.00 Compliance Training Registration 50483 Mission Uniform Service 4.499.71 Uniform Rentals 50484 Morton Sall 595.73 Sall 50485 Motion Industries 76.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50486 Motorola Communications&Electronics 880.86 Communiation Equipment 50487 MCR Technologies,Inc. 1,643.11 Linear Charts 60488 MGD Technologies,Inc. 9.800.00 Temporary Flow Momtaring 50489 National Plant Services,Inc. 440.00 Vacuum Truck Services 50490 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 8,000.00 High-Voltage Electrical Safety Training 50491 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 16,417.01) Source Control Training Registration and Softvrare License 50492 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc 1,496.01 Hydraulic Oil 50493 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1,263.78 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 50494 Nobellec 1250.00 Software Maintenance 50495 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,619.92 Office Supplies 5D496 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 81.44 Electrical Parts&Supplies 5D497 Orange County Business Council 45.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 50498 Oxygen Service Company 1.044.03 Specialty Gases 50499 OCB Reprographics 10.826.46 Printing Service-MO 1126100 50500 Pace Analytic Services 1,550.00 Lab Analyses of Wastewater&Biosolids 5D501 Pacific Bell 1,148.81 Telephone Services 50502 Paris Unlimited 66.11 Automotive Repair Parts 5D503 PenValve 162.94 Plumbing Paris&Supplies 5D504 Ponlon Industries,Inc. 15,286.59 Motor&Instrument Parts 50505 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 508.30 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 50506 Primary Source 4,794.23 Office Furniture 50607 Progressive Business Publications 299.00 Subscription 50508 Public Risk Management Assoc. 310.00 Membership 50509 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2.300.12 Trash Removal 50510 Red Wing Shoes 86.20 Reimbursable Safety Shces 50511 Alabaster 9.230.25 Employee Medical Health Premium 50512 Remedyremp,Inc. 3.853.70 Temporary Employment Services 50513 RBF Engineers 5.725.31 Engineering Services 2-24-1 Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 01116103 to 01131103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50514 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 3.404.00 Engineering Services P2.85-1 50515 RPM Electric Motors 333.87 Electrical Parts&Supplies 50516 Saddleback Materials Co.,Inc. 255.00 Sand Bags 50517 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 2,250.00 Construction-Manhole Rehabilitation&Concrete Repairs 50518 Schwing America,Inc. 1,306.87 Motor 50519 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 4,058.00 Inst.Parts&Supplies 50520 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 286.97 Water Use 50521 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 880.96 Repair&Mains.Materials&Mechanical Parts 50522 Supelco,Inc. 167.07 Lab Parts&Supplies 50523 Smith-Emery Company 1,803.50 Soil Testing MO 7.13.94 50524 Soufltem California Edison 31.26 Power 50525 Sparkletls 1,580.88 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 50526 Steekase 3,659.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 50527 Strata International,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 50528 Sol Industrial Pans 906.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50529 SCTNA 125.00 Membership-Southern California Telecommunication Networking Association 50530 Solar Turbines, no. 728.04 Repair Services-Solar Turbine Controls 50531 SPX Valves&Control 6,207.80 Valves 50532 Thermo Spectronic 869.15 Lab Instruments Calibration&Repair Services 50533 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 335.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50534 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 50535 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services W06 Daily Pilot 162.50 Notices&Ads 50537 Tanya Lock&Safe Service&Sales 224.96 Locks&Keys 50538 The Trans Company 3.187.00 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 50539 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 8.449.09 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 50540 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 10D.00 Lab Analyses 50541 Teksyslems 23,248.84 Temporary Employment Services 50542 US Filter Corporation 1.099.00 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 50543 The Unisource Corporation 142.82 Office Supplies 50544 United Parcel Service 658.66 Parcel Services 50545 Defense Finance and Accounting 2,743.31 Professional Services J-85.Naval Post Graduate School 50546 Universal Specialties,Inc. 1.529.40 Plumbing Supplies 50547 UCI Regents 4,868.84 Professional Services J-85 50548 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 223.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 50549 Verizon California 589.57 Telephone Services 50550 Veme's Plumbing 75.00 Service Contract-Testing&Carl.Backflow Devices at PIN.1 &2&Pump Ste. 50551 Village Nurseries 69.09 Landscaping Supplies 50552 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 519.88 Lab Paris&Supplies 50553 The Wackenhut Corporation 14,696.34 Security Guards 50554 Walden&Associates 7,324.54 Professional Services-Big Canyon Trunk Sewer 50555 Wastewater Technology Trainers 3.975.00 O&M Training Registration W556 Water Environment Federation 2.010.00 Membership 50557 Wards Sanitary Supply 77.04 Janitorial Supplies 50558 Weber Scientific 169.50 Lab Supplies 50559 Xerox Corporation 503.58 Copler Lease 50560 XESystems,Inc. 605.00 Maintenance Contract-Xerox Synegix 50561 The Yakima Company 24,051.47 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT B , r Claims Paid From 01/16/03 to 01131103 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50562 Blake Anderson 156.60 Meelingri'mining Expense Reimbursement 50563 Carol T.Beekman 297.84 Meeling/Treining Expense Reimbursement 50564 Kelly J.Christensen 1,281.00 Meeling/Treining Expense Reimbursement 50565 CSI Computational Systems 3,885.30 Mechanical Maintenance Training Registration 50566 Dean M.Fisher 771.12 Meeting/fmining Expense Reimbursement 50567 Robert P.Ghirelli 632.74 Meeling7rmining Expense Reimbursement 50568 Parker,Joan E. 552.81 Meetirg/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 50569 County,of Orange-Auditor Controller 255.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 50570 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 600.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 50571 Orroole,Dennis 87.50 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 50572 Orange County Business Council 20.00 O &M Meeting Registration 50573 Orange County Sanitation District 1.036.99 Patty Cash Reimb. 50574 Public Storage.Inc. 708.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 50575 SWRCS Accounting Office 750.00 Building Permit Fee 60576 Varco Systems 4.806.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,606,858.49 Payroll Disbursements 28929-29D40 Employee Paychecks $ 166.241.08 Bkaeekly Payron 01/22/03 81176-81655 Direct Deposit Statements 864,831.70 Biweekly Payroll 01/22/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,031,072.78 Wire Transfer Payments Stale Street Bank&Trust 1,142,018.98 January P&I Payment on Bad"1990-92 Advance Refund Certificates of Participation Stare Street Bank&Trust 183.387.47 January Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 1,925A06.45 Total Claims Paid 01/16/03-01131103 $ 7,563,337.72 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT B BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To ad.or on. 3/26/03 AGENDA REPORT em Number Item Number 8 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District. For the specks of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. SUMMARY See attached listing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 02/01/03— 02/15/03 and 02/16/03—02/28/03 Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02128/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51078 The Holman Group 1,704.24 Employee Assistance Program Premium 51079 Home Depot 210.91 Misc. Papelr& Maintenance Material 51080 Hopkins Technical Products 3.221.29 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51081 Horizon Technology 836.OD Lab Parts& Supplies 51082 Hub Auto Supply 300.14 Vehicle Pans & Supplies 51083 City of Huntington Beach 15.530.18 Water Use 51084 HC8 Cutler 1,532.77 Mechanical Supplies,Tools& Ladders 61085 Imaging Express 228.04 Toner Cartridges 51080 Industrial Distribution Group 2,102.12 Mechanical Pans, Supplies & Tools $1087 Industrial Filter Manufacturers,Inc. 2.470.04 Fillers 51088 IBM 408.00 Software Support IBM AS400 51089 Interstate Battery Systems 778.18 Batteries 51090 Invonsys Systems, Inc. 1,030.85 Electrical Pans& Supplies 51091 Irvine Technology Corporation 13,360.00 Temporary Employment Services 51092 Jay's Catering 1,030.45 Meeting Expenses 51093 Johnstone Supply 381.74 Electrical Pans& Supplies 51094 JPR Systems, Inc. 2,091.38 Mechanical Pans & Supplies 51095 J2 Printing Services 156.24 Printing 31098 Kaman Industrial Technologies 2,652.44 Electrical Pans & Supplies 51097 Kelth Boger 1.335.00 O & M Training Registration 51098 Kett US 6,465.00 Equipment Rental 51099 Lab Safely Supply, Inc. 067.07 Instrument Pane& Supplies 51100 Laxle-Nexle 40.86 Books & Publications 51101 Lord&Sons. Inc. 517.20 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51102 Luccl's 494.04 Meeting Expense 51103 Lytle Screen Printing 511.81 Printing -OCSD Now Board Orientation Tote Bags 51104 Manley's Boller, Inc. 930.00 Boller Emissions Testing $1105 MarVao Electronics 26.83 Electrical Parts& Supplies 51106 Matt Chlor,Inc. 5.058.98 Valves 51107 MoSain Instruments 570.00 Lab Maintenance -(12)Microscopes 51108 McKenna Engineering & Equipment Co., Inc. 188.25 Filters 61109 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2.613.12 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 81110 Mac Analytical System 1,465.00 Toxicity Analysis $1111 Media Resurfacing Systems, Inc. 2.000.00 Belt Press Maintenance $1112 Mori Controls Co. 91.09 Instrument Supplies 51113 Michael Turnlpased &Associates 1.562.50 Professional Service-Tula Ranch & Yakima Sites Study 51114 Mission Uniform Service 5.183.92 Uniform Rentals 51115 Mykrolls Corporation 1,196.00 Calibration Service- (2) Mass Flow Controllers 61116 Nahabit& Associates. Inc. 886.00 Purchasing Training Registration 51117 National Technology Transfer,Inc. 11,125.34 Human Resources Safety Training -Electrical Code 51110 NoWereanl Of Southern California 595.DO Human Resources Security System Improvements 51119 City of Newport Beach 11.87 Water Use 51120 Nlcksy Petroleum Co., Inc. 1.596.31 Turbine& Machine OM 51121 The Norco Companies 165.00 Mall Delivery Service 51122 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 46.00 Steel Tags 51123 NAB Associates, Inc. 1,673.00 Toxicity Analysis 51124 NCO Porter Novelll, Inc. 9,844.64 Professional Services- Public Relations 51125 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,229.03 Office Supplies Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT B ti BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlng Date To ad,of Dir. 3/26/03 AGENDA REPORT I[em Number Item Number s Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. SUMMARY See attached listing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 02/01/03—02/15/03 and 02/16/03—02/28/03 Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02M 5103 4 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 50677 Blue Cross of California $ 273,608.50 Medical Insurance Premium 50578 Orange County Sanitation District 537.430.08 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 50579 Southern California Edison 68.677.59 Power $0580 Air& Waste Management Assoc. 1.290.00 Air Duality Meeting Registration $0681 Alrgas Safety 225.65 Safety Supplies & Equipment 50682 American Airlines 4.803.00 Travel Services 50583 AT&T Universal Biller 2.483.12 Telephone Sarvics 50584 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 85.41 Telephone Service 50585 Court Order 628.20 Wage Garnishment 50586 Capital Appraisal Service 90.00 Vehicle Accident Claim Appraisal Service 50587 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 50588 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 513.15 Plumbing Supplies 50589 Court Trustee a9.12 W age Garnishment 50590 CW EA 2002 Annual Conference 1,220.00 O & M Training Registration -California Water Environment Association 50591 CW EA Specially Conference 926.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 60592 Diamond H Recognition 136.02 Employee Service Awards 50593 Document Control Solutions, Inc. 3,044.03 Software 50694 DIRECTV 075.00 Subscription 50595 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 6.30a.01 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical& Dependent Care 50696 Eric Klein 10,000.00 EMT Retreal-Strategic Planning.Communications& Negotiations Training 50597 Court Order 526.00 Wage Garnishment 50598 FIIoNET Corporation 1.862.49 Software Maintenance Contract Tax 50599 Five Star Metals, Inc. 667.76 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 50000 Franchise Tax Board 337.20 Wage Garnishment 50801 City of Fullerton 91.71 Water Use 50602 BE Supply 14,744.54 (1) Relay Output Board & (1) Interface Board 50603 Government Finance Officers Association 420.00 Membership 50604 Ascom Hasler Melling Systems 2,551.50 Software Maintenance-Mall Manager Intellhouch System 50605 City of Huntington Beach 30.84 taster Use 50606 Internal Revenue Service 150.00 W age Garnishment 90607 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3.249.75 Dues Deduction 60608 J & B Auto Pans 688.86 Auto Pans& Supplies 50609 J.D. Edwards So.Calif. Users Group 300.00 Membership 50610 Lucal's 14.85 Meeting Expense 60611 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 00.47 Mechanical Pans & Supplies 50612 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 1,676.00 Pump Repairs 50613 Motion Industries 641.84 Pump Supplies 50614 National Bond& Trust 1,700.02 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 50015 Nextel Communications 3,492.05 Cellu lar P hones & Air Tima 50610 OCBC: Orange County Business Council 360.00 Engineering Training Registration 60017 OCEA 524.61 Due, Deduction 50018 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 50619 Partners Consulting Services 13,080.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 50620 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 50621 Pro-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 493.30 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 50022 Projects Partners 3,275.22 Temporary Employment Services 50a23 Rellestar Bankers Security Llfe Ins. 9.507.48 Employee Life Ins. Premium,Short-Term Disability& Cancer Ins. Payroll Deductions Page 1 of 0 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50624 RPM Electric Motors 333.87 Electrical Pans & Supplies 50625 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,425.30 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 50626 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 368.14 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 50627 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 291.80 Plumbing Supplies 50628 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 50629 Thompson Industrial Supply Inc. 2,473.06 Mechanical Supplies 50630 V.S.Army Corps of Engineers 1,700.00 Temporary Access Survey License -2.24.1 50631 Union Bank of California 4,586.13 Banking Services 50632 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 50633 Verizon California 815.83 Telephone Services 50634 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 8.740.32 Vision Service Premium 50635 Wastewater Technology Trainers 715.00 O & M Training Registration 50636 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment 50637 WEF 134.00 Membership -Water Environment Federation 50638 W QI(Water Quality, Inc.) 350.00 O & M Training Registration 50639 Xerox Corporation 4,174.70 Copier Lease & Office Supplies 50640 Gary P.Conklin 1,299.95 M satin g/T raining Expense Reimbursement 50641 Marcus D.Dubois 814.94 M satin g/T raining Expense Reimbursement 50642 Vladim it A. Kogan 270.23 M satin g/T raining Expense Reimbursement 50643 John D. Linder 180.00 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 50644 Chris Maher 182.92 M eating/T raining Expense Reimbursement 50645 Patrick W. McNally 298.15 Mestingaraining Expense Reimbursement 50640 Mark Mutz 250.00 MeefingRralning Expense Reimbursement 50647 Julian F.Sabrt 197.34 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 50648 Mark S.Wilson 250.00 M esting/Training Expanse Reimbursement 50649 Ferguson,Victor 1.703.86 Employee Computer Loan Program 50650 Harris, Randy 605.55 Employee Computer Loan Program 50851 Sabri,Julian& Fry's Electronics 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 50652 SARBS-CW EA 20.00 O & M Training Registration 50653 Susan Zamudio 82.04 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 50664 American Express 25.406.07 Purchasing Card Program, Misc. Supplies& Services 50665 American Machinery& Blade. Inc. 69,574.18 (1)Hydraulic Four-Roll,Double Initial, Pinch Plate Gentling Machine 50656 Brown and Caldwell 112,233.67 Prof.Sews. 1-98,& Needs Assessment Study,O & M Manuals& SOP Development 50657 Carrillo Engineers 321,947.09 Professional Services P7-60, P2-60 & Mlerofiltration Demo. Project 5D658 Carollo Engineers 318,724.13 Engineering Services P2-66 50659 Cooper Energy Services 53.378.76 Engine Supplies 50660 CH2M Hill 157,535.35 Professional Services J40-6&J-40-7 50661 Graybar 26.406.59 Software Upgrade & (10) Enclosures& Panels 50662 Hill Brothers 26.739.82 Chemicals-Odor& Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 50663 IPMC c/o Parsons 354,531.00 Professional Services -Project Management Program 50664 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 42,422.69 Medical Insurance Premium 50665 Kemiron Pacific. Inc. 129.072.33 Ferric Chlorite NO 9.27-95 50666 Kforce Professional Slaffing 39,771.18 Temporary Employment Services 50667 Lee& Ro, Inc. 34,259.23 Professional Services P247-3 50668 Malcolm Pirnle, Inc. 160.453.25 Professional Services 1-10 50669 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 32.947.31 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 50670 Voided Check - - 50671 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 32.136.01 Engineering Services J-35-1 Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT A e Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant NO. Vendor Amount Description 60672 Pioneer Am ericas, Inc. 113.19171 Sodium Hypochlorke 50673 Projects Partners 62.742.51 Temporary Employment Services 50674 So.Cal.Gas Company 30,871.42 Natural Gas 50675 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 38,170.12 Annual Emission, Operation & Misc. Fees 50676 SPEC Services. Inc. 46,369.22 Engineering Services J-33.1 & P1-89 50677 Tule Ranch 173,026.23 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 50678 U.S. Metro Group, Inc. 36.064.00 Janitorial& Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 50679 U.S. Peroxide 136,494.18 Hydrogen Peroxide 50680 Waters Engineering, Inc. 31.037.51 Engineering Service J-67 50681 Green Giant Landscape, Inc. 70,668.00 Construction P2-84 50682 J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. 145,718.53 Construction J-35-1 50683 Margate Construction, Inc. 2,720,990.00 Construction P1.37 50684 Oved Cagan Construction Co. 95,358.72 Construction J-90 50685 Steve P. Rados, Inc. 827,714.70 Construction 1-2-4 50686 Union Bank of California 91,968.30 Construction 1-2.4, Retention 50687 Orange County Sanitation District 25,356.49 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 50688 Air Products & Chemicals 25,758.02 O & M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8.8.89 50689 AccuStandard, Inc. 176.85 Lab Supplies 50690 Adamson Industries 1,289.77 Lab Parts& Supplies 50691 Great American Printing Co. 172.40 Printing 50692 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 920.00 Professional Services -Engine Support 50693 Airborne Express 20.17 Air Freight 50694 Airgas -West 790.90 Lab Pans& Supplies 50695 Airgas Safety 3.726.96 Safety Supplies 50696 Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. 4,460.86 Manhole Frames & Covers 50697 All American Asphalt 17,550.00 Manhole Grade Adjustments -City of Cypress 50698 Applied Industrial Technology 628.38 Mechanical Supplies 50699 Aspen Publishers, Inc. 157.28 Publication 50700 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg, Atrium 50701 ACS Hydraulics, Inc. 715.64 Hydraulic Motor 50702 AKM Consulting Engineers 23,681.60 Professional Services 7.36,7.39,7.41 -Trunk Sewer Improvements 50703 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 107.21 Telephone Service 50704 AVO International 3,790.00 O & M Meeting Registration 50705 AWSI 196.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 50706 Baker Tanks 8,898.89 Rental Equipment-Tanks & Fence Berms 50707 Ballantyne, Inc. 3.480.00 Temporary Employment Services 50708 Beef. Chemical Solutions 4,274.13 Sodium Blsulflte 50709 Battery Specialties 2,439.74 Batteries 60710 Blo-Rad Lab 158.14 Lab Parts & Supplies 50711 Black& Veatch Corporation 16,647.85 Engineering Services P2.85 50712 Boyle Engineering Corporation 13,841.28 Engineering Services 6.13 50713 Brenntag West, Inc. 313.48 Janitorial Supplies 50714 Bush & Associates, Inc. 6.550.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 50715 Business Objects AmerlCas 13,563.99 Software Maintenance -Business Objects 50716 BC Wire Rope & Rigging 306.22 Mechanical Parts,Supplies & Service 50717 C.S.U.F. Foundation 10.031.25 Membership -Centerior Demographic Research 50718 C-Temp, Inc. 1.246.44 Engine Parts & Supplies 50719 Cal Protection 56.03 Service Agreement- Halon Fire System at Pit.2 Control Canter Page 3018 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrem No. Vendor Amount Description 50720 California Barricade Rentals 575.00 Barricade Rentals 50721 Caltrol, Inc. 149.31 Electrical Pans& Supplies 60722 Cambridge Isotope Labs 1.400.66 Lab Pane & Supplies 50723 Cayman Chemical Company 742.00 Lab Pans & Supplies 80724 C9112C@ll 235.62 Communication Equipment 50725 Codified Truck Bodies 7,773.04 (10) Powder-Coated,2-Drawer, Flip-Lid Truck Tool Boxes 50726 Charles P.Crowley Co. 3,063.51 Electrical Pans& Supplies 50727 Charts. Inc. 276.87 Charts $0728 Con-Way Western Express 940.51 Freight Charges 50729 Consolidated Elect. Distributors. Inc. 4,049.10 Electrical Supplies 50730 Consumers Pipe& Supply Co. 3.531.29 Plumbing Supplies 50731 Corporate Express 4.320.89 Office Supplies 50732 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 1,229.32 Mechanical Paris & Supplies 50733 County of Orange -Auditor Controller 10,125.00 Underground Storage Tank, Hazardous Malarial,& State Fees 50734 County Wholesale Electric Co. 467.46 Electrical Pads& Supplies 50735 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Melnt.Agreement-Con Gen Water Softener System 30736 CAPIO 175.00 Membership -California Association of Public Info.Officials 50737 CGVL Engineers 3,905.26 Professional Services P1-94 50738 Cite Specialty Chemicals Corporation 14,885.87 Cationic Polymer 50730 CPI International 1.089.73 Lab Parts& Supplies 50740 County Sanitation District No.70 4.760.00 Olfactometry Lab Expense 50741 CWEA 285.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 50742 CWEA Membership 276.00 Membership-Calif. Water Environment Assoc. 50743 Dapper Tire Co. 353.69 Truck Tires 50744 David's Tree Service 400.00 Tree Melnt.Service 50745 Dal Mar Analytical 4,538.00 Blosollds Analysis 50740 Delafleld Corp. 1,397.96 Hose Assembly 50747 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 1.832.83 (5) Dell AXIMs and (2) DVD Rom Drives 50748 Dick Munns Co. 1 f0.00 Calibrate Meter 50749 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 200.87 Paint Supplies 50750 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. aeg.93 Electrical Supplies 50751 Ecology Control Industries 1.088.00 Hazardous Waste Disposal 50752 Element K Journals 87.00 Publication 50753 Elliott Bay Design Group 364.28 Naval Architecture Marine Engineering Services 50764 Environmental& Occupational Risk Mgmt. 2,250.00 Professional Services -Inspection of Operations Center Basement Wall Cavities 50755 Environmental Science Associates 11.690.43 Professional Services J-87 50756 Pacific States Chemical, Inc. 1,676.31 Chemicals 50757 Excel Door& Gate Company, Inc. 1,659.00 Door Repair-Bldg.C Roll-Up Doom 50758 ENS Resources, Inc. 15,102.16 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 50769 FodEx Corporation 364.80 Air Freight 50760 First American Real Estate Solutions 174.50 Orange County Property Information 50781 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 15.008.81 Lab Parts & Supplies 50762 Flo. Systems, Inc. 36.33 Pump Supplies 50763 Flub Dynamics 12.971.80 Polymer Dilution It Feed System & Meters 50764 Foodcraft Coffee & Refreshment Services 326.08 Meeting Supplies 50765 Fountain Valley Camera 14.17 Photo Supplies 50766 Fry's Electronics 833.66 Computer Supplies 50707 Full Spectrum Anslyllcs 1.121.74 Instrument Repairs Page 4of8 EXHIBIT , Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vandor Amount Description 50768 GE Supply 106.79 Electric Pans 50769 Garland Manufacturing Co. 1,787.66 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 50770 Garratt-Callahan Company 1.101.75 Chemicals 50771 Getinge Castle 70.89 Lab Supplies 50772 Glass Tech Supplies, Inc. 693.91 Lab Paris& Supplies $0773 W W Grainger, Inc. 1.200.40 Electrical Pans& Supplies 50774 Great W astern Sanitary Supplies 480.36 Janitorial Supplies 50775 Hooker Equipment Company 1,832.69 Truck Pans& Service 30776 Hach c/o Portion Industries 1,670.47 Lab Pans & Supplies 50777 American Sigma.Inc. 128.00 Instrument Repairs & Calibration 50778 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 1,487.27 Plumbing Supplies 60779 Aseom Heeler Meiling Systems 575.00 Software Maintenance - Mail Manager Intell8ouch System 60780 Hatch & Kirk. Inc. 4,385.35 Engine Generator Control Supplies 50781 Henry Company-Sealants Division 159.03 Sealant 50782 HIM, Inc. 5.727.65 Mechanical Pans & Supplies 50783 Home Depot 364.54 Misc. Repair& Maintenance Material 50784 Hopkins Technical Products 7,812.42 Pump 5, Pump Supplies 50785 Horizon Technology 617.95 Lab Parts & Supplies 50786 HI Standard Automotive 472.46 Automotive Parts& Supplies 50787 Imaging Express 199.93 Printer Maintenance 50788 Imperial Flange & Fitting Co., Inc. 767.18 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 50789 Industrial Distribution Group 505.86 Mechanical Pans & Supplies 50790 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 211.93 Lab Supplies 50791 Interstate Battery Systems 497.30 Batteries 50792 Intratek Computer, Inc. 4,487.73 Software -Cisco Secure 50793 Invensys Systems, Inc. 3,241.11 Instrument Supplies 50794 Iron Mountain 150.00 Old Document Storage Fees -J-39 & PI.37 50795 IBM Corp. 15.750.00 Prof. Services -Network Upgrade & Design Consulting 50796 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 3,827.47 Instrument Pans, Supplies& Yearly Inspection 8 Certification of Trl-Pod Winch 50797 Jay's Catering 002.42 Meeting Expenses 50798 Johnson Bearing 4,800.00 Cleaning Solvent 50799 Johnstone Supply 1.040.43 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 50a00 Kam Advance Materials, Inc. 7.682.50 Eng. Services -Con Gen Engine No.3 50801 KL&P Marketing 749.15 Safely Incentive Items 50802 L& N Uniform Supply Co. 1.833.89 Logo Printing/Embroidery Services 50803 Lab Support 601.75 Temporary Employment Services 50804 Lebware, Inc. 1.500.00 Lab Training Registration 50805 Lexis Nexis Matthew Bandar 311.37 Publication 50806 Luccl's 201.12 Meeting Expense 50807 LINJER 4,565.18 Professional Service -DART NO 9.22.99 50808 M.J. Schiff& 7.esociates, Inc. 12.332.60 Professional Services -Corrosion Study 50809 Management Technologies 659.59 Prolecl Management Office Training Registration 50810 Manatt. Phelps& Phillips,L.L.P. 5.000.00 Strategic Planning & Advocacy 50811 MarVao Electronics 19.24 Electrical Parts& Supplies 50af2 Malt Chlor, Inc. 961.00 Valves 50813 Mc Junkln Corp--Ontario Branch 2.819.47 Valves 50814 MCMasler-Carr Supply Co. 2,503.41 Mechanical Paris & Supplies 50815 Mee Analytical System 6.559.00 Lab Analysis-Core Ocean Monitoring Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50816 Medlin Controls Co. 1.415.63 Instrument Supplies 50817 MIIltronks c/o RMS Engineering 192.01 Electrical Supplies 50818 Mission Uniform Service 3,129.23 Uniform Rentals 50819 MSA c/o Mall Systems 411.49 Instrument Supplies 50820 N. Glantz& Son 455.00 Reflective Sheeting 50821 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 12,323.34 Safety Training Registration -National Electric Code Training 50822 Nenfersent of Southern California 7,918.31 Access Control System Maintenance 50823 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 179.17 Grease 50824 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 103.55 Steel Tags 50825 NRG Energy, Inc. 1.508.04 Explosion Relief Valves $0826 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.472.25 Office Supplies 50827 Olympus America, Inc. 8.000.76 Mechanical Repairs 50828 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 370.40 Janhorsl Supplies 50829 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 69.94 Electrical Pans& Supplies 50830 Orange County Hose Company 183.61 Hose Supplies 50831 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 738.91 Valves 50832 ONIs Fire Protection 2,055.00 Maintenance,Testing& Certification of Fire Sprinkler Systems at she. 1 & 2 50833 Oxygen Service Company 3.252.22 Specialty Oases 50834 OCS Reprographics 1,901.98 Printing Service- MO 1126100 50835 OI Analytical 520.89 Lab Pane& Supplies 50838 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 932.74 Electrical Supplies 50837 Pace Analytic Services 1,550.00 High Resolution Analysis of Effluent& Blosollds 50838 Pacific Bell 34.81 Telephone Services 50839 Pacific Bell/W orldCom 119.98 Telephone Services 50840 Pacific Mechanical Supply 701.62 Plumbing Supplies 50841 Pacific Parts& Controls 720.80 Electrical Pans& Repairs 50842 Pacific West Printing & Promotions 405.64 Rldeshare Program Promotional Coffee Mugs w/Logo 50843 Panemetrles 641.00 Calibrate Portable Flow Molar 50844 Parker Motion & Controls Sales 61.11 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 50845 Parker Supply Company 1.799.82 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 50846 Partners Consulting Services 8,460.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 50847 Pans Unlimited 18.86 Truck Supplies 50848 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,332.00 Dues Deduction 50849 PenVelve 648.66 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 50850 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 16.514.07 Lab Instrument Software/Hardware 50851 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 175.49 Electrical Supplies 50852 Power Systems Testing 500.00 Electrical Equipment Testing Services 50853 Powerflo Products, Inc. $88.00 Pump & Pump Supplies 50854 Public Resources Advisory Group 2.187.50 Financial Advisory Services $0055 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 3.771.25 Pumps 50856 Pump Engineering &/or OAIr California 394.99 Mechanical Parts & Supplies $0857 Quality Building Supply 210.55 Hardscaps Supplies 50858 R. L. Abbott& Associates 3,000.00 Kern County Slosolide Consulting Services 50859 Randolph Austin Co. 681.11 Tubing 50800 Red Wing Shoes 307.74 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 50861 Regents of Unly. of California 12,066.29 Professional Services J-86 50882 Retrofit Pars & Components, Inc. 379.22 Valve 50863 Rockwall Engineering & Equipment Co. 7.477.85 Chopper Pump Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT A L1, Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02M 5/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50864 RPM Electric Molars 6,535.18 Motors 50865 AS Hughes Co,Inc. 295.00 Paint Supplies 50866 Schwing America, Inc. 840.02 Pump Supplies 50867 Scott Specialty Oases, Inc. 46.53 Freight 50868 Shureluck Sales It Engineering 590.99 Mechanical Pane 8 Supplies 50869 SkIIIPath On-Site 5,100.00 On-See Training 50870 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 117.53 Plum bing Supplies 50871 Smith-Emery Company 4.639.50 Professional Services Pl-378741 60872 Snap On Industrial 157.32 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 50873 Snap-On Tools 300.14 Tools 50874 SoftVlew Computer Products 1,128.08 Misc. Office Supplies 8 Fixtures 50875 Southern California Air Cord. Dist. 1,100.58 Electrical Supplies 50876 Southern California Edison 9.547.32 Power 50077 Sparkletta 1.462.28 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 50878 Specialized Powder Coating 352.00 Powder Coating of Tool Box Brackets 50879 Standard Industrial Corp. 104.09 Publication 50880 Sterling Fluid Systems(USA),Inc. 1.833.61 Pump 50881 Summit Steel 283.39 Metal 50882 Sunset Industrial Pans 597.18 Mechanical Supplies 50883 Systlme Computer Corp. 5,800.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One World XE Implementation 50884 South Coast Environmental Co. 1,328.39 Can Gan Emi.slons Testing Service 50885 SCP Science 314.00 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 60886 Solar Turbines, Inc. 701.00 Solar Turbine Controls Repair 50887 SPX Valves 6 Control 1,178.47 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 50888 Tamara Block 327.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 60889 Taylor-Dunn 290.65 Electric Cart Pans 50890 Thermo Electron Spectroscopy 310.07 Lab Pans 8 Supplies 50891 Osprey Marine Management 1,050.00 Lab Analyses 50892 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4,938.38 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 50893 Deily Pilot 50.00 Notices 8 Ads 50894 Tony's Lock S Safe Service 8 Sales 75.47 Locks 6 Keys 50895 The Trans Company 450.42 Electrical Parts a Supplies 50896 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 320.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11.94 30897 Truck 8 Auto Supply, Inc. 1.517.67 Automotive Supplies 50898 Teksystems 3,280.00 Temporary Employment Services 50899 US Filter Corporation 1,499.00 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 50900 Ultra SclenI61c 569.95 Lab Pan. a Supplies 50901 United Parcel Service 35.50 Parcel Services 50902 United Rentals. Inc. 120.12 Pellet Jack Rental 50003 Defense Finance and Accounting 8,253.47 Professional Services J-85 - Naval Post Graduate School 50904 Univar USA $27.08 Chlorine 50906 UC Regents 595.00 Human Resources Training Registration 50906 U-Llne 597.04 Office Supplies 50907 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 10,908.00 Temporary Employment Service 50908 Vapex,Inc. 9,509.46 Instrument Paris 8 Supplies 60909 Verizon California 6,388.47 Telephone Services 50910 Verney Plumbing 75.00 Service Contract-Testing 8 Can. Backflow Devices at Pits. 1 It 2 8 Pump Ste. 50911 VW R Scientific Products Corporation 4,419.07 Lab Pans a Supplies Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 02/01/03 to 02/15/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50912 The Wackenhut Corporation 15.275.95 Security Guards 50913 Waco Filter 1,007.61 Filtration System Supplies 50914 Wally Machinery and Tool Supply, Inc. 1,603.21 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 50915 Weber Scientific 1.358.70 Lab Supplies 50916 W EF 288.00 Membership -Water Environment Federation 50917 Xerox Corporation 14.207.33 Fax If Copier Leases 50918 YSI Massachusetts 1.670.58 Temperature Probe & Cable 50919 California Bank&Trust 1.713.00 Construction J-33.1A, Retention 50920 Southern Contracting Company 16.423.00 Construction J-33-1A 50921 Robert M. Bell 368.00 M e ating/T raining Expense Reimbursement 50922 Pongsakdi Cady 368.00 M eelingR raining Expanse Reimbursement 50923 Mike J. Herrera 125.00 M eelingR raining Expense Reimbursement 50924 Linda Losurdo 219.73 M eelingR raining Expense Reimbursement 50925 David A. Ludwin 406.00 M eelingR reining Expense Reimbursement 50926 Patrick B. Miles 368.00 Meetin9Rreining Expense Reimbursement 50927 Matthew P.Smith 164.00 M eelingR raining Expense Reimbursement 50928 John W.Swindler 368.00 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement 60929 Aquarium of the Pacific 72.75 Reimbursable Employee Activity Expense 50930 County of Orange 86.00 Annexation Fee 50931 Orange County Sanitation District 749.83 Petty Cash Reimb. 50932 Robertson, Dana R. 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 60933 Robert J.Thiede 368.00 M eelingR raining Expense Reimbursement 50934 Orange County Water District 571,902.89 GAP Water Use & Joint G W RS Protect J-36 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 8,867,444.71 Payroll Disbursements 29041 -29180 Employee Paychecks $ 152,766.05 Biweekly Payroll 02/0S/03 29161 -29162 Interim Paychecks 2,647.51 Adjustments 81656 -82141 Direct Deposit Statements 822.626.41 Biweekly Payroll 02/05103 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 978,039.97 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas. National Association 31.915.74 January Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas, National Assoelation 130,874.37 Societe Generale January Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Manhattan Bank, New York 75,575.23 Commitment Fee on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation 11/01/02 to O1/31103 Societe Generale.New York 55,055.52 Standby Letter of Credit on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Lloyds TSB Bank plc 76,708.40 Standby Letter of Credit 1990-1992 Refunded COPS Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 370,129.26 Total Claims Paid 02/01/03 -02/15/03 $ 10,205,613.94 Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT A 6 Claims Paid From 02116/03 to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descripdon Accounts Payable-Warrants 50935 Orange County Sanitation District 3 361,351.11 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 50936 Systime Computer Corp 66,500.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One World XE Implementation 50937 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 58.09 Cellular Telephone Service 50938 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 60939 Court Order 160.00 Wage Garnishment 50940 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 44.09 Plumbing Supplies 50941 Court Trustee 09.12 Wage Garnishment 50942 CWEA Specialty Conference 181.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 50943 Electra-Bond, Inc. 23,424.85 Recasting& Machine Work on Belt, Loading & Driver Rollers 50944 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,705.39 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical& Dependent Care 50945 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 5094e Franchise Tax Board 488.89 Wage Garnishment 50047 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 164.05 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 50948 Internal Revenue Service 160.00 Wage Garnishment 50949 Intl.Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,261.52 Dues Deduction 50950 Irvine Ranch Water District 68.87 Water Use 50951 Matthew Bender& Co., Inc. 51.84 Publication 50952 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 805.38 Meters $0953 National Bond&Trust 1,795.94 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 50954 OCEA 524.61 Dues Deduction 50955 Pacific Ball 27.15 Telephone Services 50956 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 50957 Court Order 206.00 Wage Garnishment 50958 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,404.00 Dues Deduction 50959 Smerdan Supply Company/Orange Coast 14.18 Plumbing Supplies 50960 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 50961 Southern California Edison 5,629.71 Power 50982 Summit Steel 376.62 Metal 50963 Thom peon Industrial Supply, Inc. 6.504.74 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 50984 U.S Postal Service(AMS-TMS) 51000.00 Postage 50965 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 50966 Vedzon California 465.18 Telephone Services 50967 Court Order 108.00 Wage Garnishment 50968 Evangelista,Jerry 1,890.99 Employee Computer Loan Program 50969 Deirdre E. Hunter 104.74 Mesting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 50970 Jeffrey T. Reed 1,214.42 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 50971 Lisa L.Tom ko 1,001.26 Meeting/T raining Expense Reimbursement 50972 Edward M.Torres 751.11 Meating/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 50973 Ernest N.Yeboah 183.90 M eeting/T raining Expense Reimbursement 50974 JPC Construction 9,804.70 Construction-Enclose Pit.2 Dewatering Facility with Screening 50975 Air Products& Chemicals 25,758.02 O& M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8.8-89 50976 Blue Cross of California 277,266.59 Medical Insurance Premium 50977 Coral Energy Resources,L.P. 79,164.63 Natural Gas 50978 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 43.627.55 Calorie Polymer 50979 Delta Dental 50,517.50 Dental Insurance Plan 50080 Dynamic Fabrication, Inc. 33,187.00 (1)Set of Augers 50981 Jamison Engineering Contractors. Inc. 72.752.20 Construction -High-Pressure Digester Gas Pipeline Repairs & 11-23-1 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descriptbn 50982 Kemlron Pacific, Inc. 133,049.09 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27.95 50983 Orange County W star Distdcl 493,963.90 OAP W star Use & GIN RS Joint Project J-36 50904 Pacific Investment Management Co. 138,506.00 Investment Management Service Rea.95-97 30985 Palnewebber Incorporated 31,409.06 COP Remarketing Agreement 50966 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 188.859.14 Sodium Hypochlorlte 50987 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 191.633.85 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-04 50988 Southern California Edison 60,615.22 Power 50989 The Lewis Group 25.650.00 Consulting Service -Capital Project Management Process 50990 Trusecure Corporation 33,995.00 Site Secure Service 50991 Tula Ranch/Mogan Farms 159,170.66 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 50992 Steve P Rados, Inc. 708,512.40 Construction 1.2.4 50993 Union Bank of California 78,723.60 Construction 1.2.4, Retention 50994 Precision Industrial Tooling Co., Inc. 93,656.30 Mechanical Equipment-Variable Speed Lanes,Table Saws,Drill Press 50905 Adamson Industries 773.80 Lab Supplies 50996 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 769.33 Lab Parts& Supplies 50997 Alrgaa-West 0.40 Demurrage 50998 Alrgac Safety 977.10 Safely Supplies 50999 Allied Electronics, Inc. 239.58 Electrical Supplies 51000 Alta-Robbine, Inc. 103.00 Instrument Supplies 61001 American Society of Safety Engineers 140.00 Membership 51002 Aquarium Doctor 239.45 Human Resources Aquarium Service 51003 Arch Wireless 1,125.50 Pagers.Service &Airtime 51004 Argos Technologies,Inc. 153.54 Lab Parts & Supplies 51005 Associated Readymix Concrete 262.91 Concrete $1006 Association of Energy Engineers 145.00 O & M Meeting Registration 51007 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin. Bldg. Atrium 51008 Awards& Trophies Company 44.07 Plaques 51009 ADS Hydraulics, Inc. 1,997.27 Pump 51010 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 288.26 Telephone Service 51011 AT&T W Iralasa Services 118.48 Wireless Phone Services 51012 Battery Specialties 145.85 Batteries 51013 BloMerieux V6ek, Inc. 1.027.76 Lab Supplies 51014 Bnnderson Corporation 7,192.00 Professional Services P1.95 51015 Burks Engineering Co. 423.00 Motor $1016 BC Wire Rope & Rigging 32.33 Mechanical Parts,Supplies& Service 51017 C-Temp, Inc. 309.79 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51018 California Automatic Gate 1.270.00 Automatic Gate Repairs at Pit.2 51019 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 120.00 Membership 51020 Catapult Systems Corp0hulon 1,316.92 Soltware/Hardware $1021 Certified Truck Bodies 484.88 Electrical Parts& Supplies 51022 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. 87.61 Office Supplies 51023 Cole-Parmor Instrument Co. 213.72 Lab Parts & Supplies 51024 Communications Supply Corp. 14,736.79 Electrical Pans& Supplies 51025 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 1.675.68 Electrical Supplies 51026 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 2,852.60 Plumbing Supplies 51027 Control Factors -Seattle, Inc. 994.80 Fiber Elements 51020 Control Technologies 9,492.78 Mechanical Parts,Supplies& Equipment $1029 Cooper Energy Services 3,637.87 Engine Supplies Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT 0 a ' Claims Paid From 02/16M to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51030 Cooper Energy Services 2.380.00 O & M Training Registration 51031 Corporate Express Imaging 5,301.33 Computer Supplies 51032 Corporate Express 8,267.21 Office Supplies 51033 Cost Containment Solutions 3,770.55 Worker's Comp. Services 51034 County Wholesale Electric Co. 905.41 Electrical Pans at Supplies 51035 CMAA 225.00 Engineering&Construction Management Training Registration 51036 CR&R, Inc. 3.207.89 Container Rentals 51037 CW EA 823.45 Source Control Meeting Registration& Publication 51038 CW EA 2002 Annual Conference 2,005.00 0 & M Meeting Registration -California Water Environment Association 51039 CWEA Mom bershlp 92.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 51040 Dal Mar Analytical 204.00 Blcsolids Analysis 51041 Detection Instruments Corporation 308.68 Ins. Pans& Supplies 51042 Clorox Corporation 2,810.60 Lab Pans & Supplies 51043 E.I.Du Pont Do Nemours and Company 2,950.00 Painting Melnt. Services MO 4.22-98 51044 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 136.77 Electrical Supplies 51045 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 265.00 Medical Screening 51046 Elaclro-Teal, Inc. 7.603.44 Electrical Supplies 51047 Elliott Bay Design Group 152.53 Professional Services - Evaluation of Responses to RFP 51048 Employee Benefits Specialists.Inc. 637.30 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical& Dependent Care 51049 Enchanter, Inc. 9,900.00 Ocean Monitoring NO 5-24.95 51050 Environmental& Occupational Risk Mgmt 900.00 Professional Services -Inspection of 0 & M Control Ch.Basement Wall Cavities 51051 Environmental Engineering & Contracting 20,000.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 51052 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 4,625.14 Lab Pane & Supplies 51053 Envirowln Software, Inc. 407.00 Software 51054 ESRI, Inc. 3.200.00 Engineering Training Registration 51055 FedEx Corporation 243.29 Air Freight 51056 Filarsky& Watt.L.L.P. 1.045.00 Prof.Services -Labor Negotiations Services with OCSD's Bargaining Groups 51057 Filler Supply Company 3,016.70 Fibers 51058 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 3,422.54 Lab Pans& Supplies 51059 Foodcraft Coffee & Refreshment Services 60.00 Meeting Supplies 51060 Franklin Covey 423.86 Office Supplies 51061 FST Sand and Gravel. Inc. 342.11 Road Base Materials 51062 Garland Manufacturing Co. 1,714.38 Mechanical Pane& Supplies 51063 Garraft-Callahan Company 7,076.69 Chemicals 51064 George Yardley Co. 646.34 Solenoid Valves 51065 Gerhardt's. Inc. 7.909.93 Copper Spark Plugs 51066 Glarlieh-Mitchell, Inc. 87.92 Mechanical Pane& Supplies 51067 Goldenwest Fence Company 465.00 Mein Street Pump Station -Fence Repairs 51068 W W Grainger,Inc. 3.526.69 Safety Signs& Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51089 Graybar 5,766./3 Hardwara/Software & Electrical Supplies 51070 Hooker Equipment Company 1.695.62 Automotive Parts& Repairs 51071 Hach c/o Penton Industries 2,130.3E Instrument Pans& Supplies 51072 American Sigma, Inc. 1,666.83 Lab Pans& Supplies 51073 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 51074 Harrington Industrial Plastics. Inc. 39.32 Plumbing Supplies 61075 Hascu Oil Co.,Inc. 218.24 Grease 51076 Hello Direct, Inc. 996.46 Telephone Headsets& Supplies 51077 HIIII, Inc. 5,939.08 Mechanical Parts & Supplies Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02128/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51078 The Holman Group 1,704.24 Employee Assistance Program Premium 51079 Home Depot 210.91 Misc. Repair& Maintenance Material 51080 Hopkins Technical Products 3.221.29 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51081 Horizon Technology 836.00 Lab Paris& Supplies 51082 Hub Auto Supply 309.14 Vehicle Pans& Supplies 51083 City of Huntington Beach 15.530.18 Water Use 51084 HCS Cutler 1.532.77 Mechanical Supplies,Tools& Ladders 51085 Imaging Express 228.04 Toner Cartridges 51086 Industrial Distributlon Group 2,102.12 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 51087 Industrial Filter Manufacturers.Inc. 2.479.04 Firers 51088 IBM 405.00 Software Support IBM AS400 51089 Interstate Battery Systems 778.18 Batteries 51090 Invensys Systems, Inc. 1,830.85 Electrical Pans& Supplies 51091 Irvine Technology Corporation 13,360.00 Temporary Employment Services 51092 Jay's Catering 1,030.45 Meeting Expenses 51093 Johnstone Supply 381.74 Electrical Pans& Supplies 51094 JPR Systems,Inc. 2.091.38 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51096 J2 Printing Services 156.24 Printing 51096 Kaman Industrial Technologies 2.652.44 Electrical Parts& Supplies 51097 KBBh Boger 1.335.00 O & M Training Registration 51098 Kett US 6.465.00 Equipment Rental 51099 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 867.07 Instrument Parts&Supplies 51100 Lexls-Nexis 48.66 Books& Publications 51101 Lord&Sons. Inc. 517.20 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51102 Luccrs 494.04 Meeting Expense 51103 Lyre Screen Printing 511.81 Printing -OCSD New Board Orientation Tote Bags 51104 Manley's Boller,Inc. 830.00 Boller Emissions Testing 51105 MarVac Electronics 26.83 Electrical Parts& Supplies 51108 Matt Chlor,Inc. 5,058.98 Valves 51107 MCSaIn Instruments 570.00 Lab Maintenance -(12)Microscopes 51108 McKenna Englneering& Equipment Co.,Inc. 160.26 Filters 61109 MCMasler-Carr Supply Co. 2,613.12 Mechanical Parts& Supplies 51110 Moo Analytical System 1,465.00 Toxicity Analysis 51111 Media Resurfacing Systems, Inc. 2,000.00 Belt Press Maintenance 61112 Medlin Controls Co. 91.99 Instrument Supplies 51113 Michael Turrlipseed &Associates 1.562.50 Professional Service-Tule Ranch & Yakima Sites Study 51114 Mission Uniform Service 5,183.92 Uniform Rentals 51115 Mykrolis Corporation 1.195.00 Calibration Service -(2) Mass Flow Controllers 51116 Nahabr& Associates, Inc. 885.00 Purchasing Training Registration 51117 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 11,125.34 Human Resources Safety Training-Electrical Code 51118 Nonfersant of Southern Cal6omia 595.00 Human Resources Security System Improvements 51119 City of Newport Beach 11.87 Water Use 51120 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 1,596.31 Turbine& Machine Oil 51121 The Norco Companies 165.00 Mall Delivery Service 51122 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 46.00 Steel Tags 51123 NAB Associates,Inc. 1.673.60 Toxicity Analysis 51124 NCG Porter Novell!, Inc. 9,844.64 Professional Services-Public Relations 51125 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.229.03 Office Supplies Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT B + Claims Paid From 02/11UN to 02/28/OS Warrant No. Vendor Allotted Description 51126 One Source Distributors, Inc. 902.77 Electrical Pans& Supplies 51127 Orange County Business Council 650.00 Communications Meeting Registration 51128 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 57.15 Plumbing Supplies 51129 Oxford University Press 74.79 Publication 51130 Oxygen Service Company 2.231.89 Specialty Gases 51131 OCB Reprographics 4.238.44 Printing Service -MO 1125/00 51132 P.L. Hewn Company, Inc. 114.34 Electrical Supplies 51133 Pace Analytic Services 075.00 High Resolution Analysis of Effluent& Blosollds 51134 Pacific Bell 1,181.50 Telephone Services 51135 Pacific Bell Internet Services 328.86 Internet Service 51136 Pacific Mechanical Supply 884.16 Plumbing Supplies 51137 Parsons Infrastructure &Tech. Group 19,900.29 Professional Services-Asset Management Program 51138 Partners Consulting Services 14,2a0.00 FIS On-Slte Support-One World XE Migration Project 51139 Pans Unlimited 49.23 Automotive Palo& Supplies 51140 Perms Pure, Inc. 219.10 Fiber 51141 Postmaster General 150.00 Postal Permit Renewal Fee 51142 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 80.93 Electrical Supplies 51143 Professional Publications, Inc. 248.97 Publication 51144 Progressive Business Publications 230.00 Publication 51145 Projects Partners 12,227.65 Temporary Employment Services 51146 PC Mall Gov. Inc. 323.2E Labeler 51147 PCs Express 110.00 Courier Service 51148 PDSA,Inc. 1,500.00 Software 51149 PR Week 128.00 Publication 51150 PSI 6,230.73 Hot& Cold Pressure Washer 51151 Pump Engineering&/or OAIr California 175.17 Pump Supplies 51152 R.W.Beck 4.099.28 Professional Services PI.90 61153 R.L.Abbott& Associates 3,000.00 Kem County Blosollds Consulting Services 51154 Raney Industries 825.00 Contract Service -Belt Press Equipment Modification 51155 Rayne Water Systems 000-D 12/31/02 1,395.04 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 51156 Rellastar 9.316.95 Employee Medical Health Premium 51157 Retmilt Parts& Components, Inc. 1,276.51 Mechanical Pads& Supplies 51158 plan &Tucker, L.L.P. 5.332.03 Legal Services-Crow-W Inthrop Development 51159 RPM Electric Motors 1,974.78 Motors, Parts& Repair Service 51160 Sanodus Corporation 131.17 Lab Paris& Supplies 51161 Schwing America, Inc. 1,595.59 Motor 61162 Seaventures 5,250.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 51163 Sent Computer Products,Inc. 6,058.34 Laser Printer/Copier 51164 Selon Name Plate Corp 112.23 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51165 Shepard Brothers, Inc. 927.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 61166 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 810.56 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 51167 Supelao,Inc. 793.76 Lab Pens& Supplies 51168 Skalar, Inc. 172.58 Lab Paris& Supplies 61169 Skylights Unlimited 1,825.00 Skylights Replacement& Removal 51170 Southern California Edison 26.81 Power 51171 Southern Counties Oil Co. 5,011.11 Diesel Fuel 51172 Spex Cenlprep• Inc. 383.61 Lab Pane & Supplies 51173 Sterling An 221.88 Stationery& Office Supplies Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02/28/03 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51174 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 276.76 Stationery&Office Supplies 51175 Strata International, Inc. 505.46 Chemicals $1176 Summit Steel 1.362.30 Metal 51177 Sunset Ford 1.548.38 Vehicle Repairs-V-478 51178 Sunset Industrial Pane 3.089.96 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51170 Super Chem Corporation 672.42 Cleaner/Degreaser 51180 Symcas-TSG 1,384.18 SCADA System,VAX Maintenance $1181 SPX Valves& Control 2,895.03 Valves 51182 The Orange County Register 4,580.36 Notices& Ads 61183 The Tin Bender 309.24 Fiberglass Duct Liner 51184 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 272.87 Mechanical Supplies 51185 Dally Pilot 250.00 Notices &Ads 51166 Tony'a Lock& Sale Service& Sales 27.21 Locke & Keys 51187 Total Safety, Inc. 313.40 Mechanical Parts,Supplies& Repair 51188 Transcat 790.51 Mechanical& Electrical Supplies 51189 Trench Shoring Company 737.01 Trench Jacks 51190 Tr"tate Pump 330.00 Pump Supplies 51101 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 0,219.09 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11.94 51102 Truck &Auto Supply,Ind. 009.05 Automotive Supplies 51193 TCH Associates, Inc. 1.919.22 Lab Supplies 51194 U.S. Metro Group,Inc. 24,785.00 Janitorial& Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 51195 Ultra Scientific $75.48 Lab Parts& Supplies 51190 United Parcel Service 1.377.26 Parcel Services 51197 US Equipment Co., Inc. 233.68 Hoses 51198 US Filter/Stranco 1.232.29 Mechanical Pans& Supplies 51199 Vellen Safety Supply Company 129.30 Safety Supplies 51200 Vapex,Inc. 836.00 Pumps 51201 Verizon California 590.74 Telephone Services 51202 Verne's Plumbing 460.00 Backllow Device Replacement 51203 Vertex,Inc. 1,845.76 Software 51204 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 8,807.04 Vision Service Premium 51205 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 2,676.89 Lab Parts & Supplies 51206 The Wackenhut Corporation 19,020.15 Security Guards 51207 Waters Corporation 1.930.95 Lab Parta&Supplies 51208 Waxle Sanitary Supply 195.55 Janitorial Supplies 51200 Westport Aparstus DBA Breaker Supply 492.42 Electrical Pans& Supplies 51210 W iteg Scientific 161.63 Lab Parts& Supplies 51211 W EF 134.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 51212 W S Atkins Water 0,000.00 Professional Services -Digester Evaluation Flow Studies 51213 Xerox Corporation 7.030.09 Fax/Copier Leases& Supplies 51214 XESystems, Inc. 302.50 Xerox Synergix Maintenance Service 51215 yokogawa Corp.of America 300.41 Instrument Supplies 51216 Richard A. Castilian 201.12 M esting/Training Expanse Reimbursement 51217 Robs"P. Ghirelli 358.34 Meeting/riaining Expense Reimbursement 51218 Victoria L. Henn 200.00 M seling/T raining Expense Reimbursement 51210 Vladlm It A. Kogan 443.06 M eeling/T raining Expanse Reimbursement 51220 Charles D. McGee 150.00 Membership 51221 Merrill F.Seller 133.00 Membership Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 02/16/03 to 02/28/03 Werrant No. Vendor Amount Description 51222 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 750.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 51923 Orange County Sanitation District 865.20 Petty Cash Re mb. 51224 Unocal Corporation•OOWD 1/2/03 5.797.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 51225 Willamette Industries, Inc. 8,225.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 51220 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 210.00 Sewer Service Fes Administration 51227 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 45.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration Total Accounts Payable•Warrants 5 4,161,591.88 Payroll Disbursements 29103 -29263 Employee Paychecks 8 166.684.67 Biweekly Payroll 02/19103 82142 -82624 Direct Deposit Statements 873,739.32 Biweekly Payroll 02/19/03 Total Payroll Disbursements 8 1,030,423.99 Wire Transfer Payments Slate Street Bank 3 Trust 134,005.76 February Interest Payment on Series 2000 A 6 B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments 3 134.005.76 Total Claims Paid 02/18/03•02/28/03 $ 5,326,021.63 Pao 7 of 7 EXHIBITS r >r DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 2003 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, February 26,2003 at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel Shirley McCracken, Chair Don Hughes Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Layne Baroldi Jim Ferryman, Chairman, OMTS Committee Mike Moore Brian Donahue, Chairman, PDC Committee Ryal Wheeler Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee Randy Fuhrman Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair Joan Irvine Smith Jan Vandersloot Directors Absent: Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman complimented the ECM staff on their work towards moving to Class A biosolids. He also complimented the work of the Engineering Department on the work it has done on the CIP reassessment. Joan Irvine Smith expressed her appreciation for supporting the blue ribbon panel concept with NWRI. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the January 22, 2003 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Director Jim Ferryman abstained. 1 1 (6) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Shirley McCracken reminded the members that the CASA Conference is going to be held at the Tenaya Lodge in Yosemite and reservations are due as soon as possible. Chair McCracken reported that she has asked staff to prepare a monthly listing of compensation payments made to directors for meetings that they have attended on behalf of the District. The governing resolution requires prior approval by the Chair for meeting attendance before compensation can be made. Corrections will be made after-the-fact in the following month's payment cycle. Chair McCracken, as chair of the Legislative Advocacy Ad Hoc Committee, reported that the committee has been meeting weekly for the past month to keep our legislative program on track. She outlined the discussion issues and indicated that proposals are due this week for services to seek grants from the state bond propositions. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Bob Ghirelli filled in for the General Manager until he returned from a meeting with the Orange County Taxpayers Association where support is being sought for exempting stonnwater and urban runoff from Proposition 218 requirements. A. Report on EMT Retreat Dr. Ghirelli reported on the EMT retreat that was held January 30-31 and February 10. The goal was to develop the major unifying strategies that will be proposed to the Board for adoption and for use by our employees. The strategies will help describe the overall strategic direction and intention of the agency and support major policy decisions that the board has made, including the move to secondary treatment standards, GW RS, water resources management and our overall wastewater treatment program, including our$2 billion (plus)capital Improvement program. B. Progress towards Achieving 3=0 Secondary Treatment Standards Dr. Ghirelli reported that work continues to move to secondary treatment standards. Secondary treatment level is now at 68 percent. Suspended solids averaged 33 ppm, close to the 30 ppm standard. BOD averaged 47 ppm. The expert panel that is reviewing our secondary treatment facilities construction schedule met for the second time today. The panel includes experts in wastewater treatment engineering, construction and operations plus a representative from OC Coastkeepers. It is chaired by Jerry Thibeault. It is taking an independent look at the scheduled developed by staff. C. Disinfection Update Dr. Ghirelli reported that staff has successfully disinfected our effluent since mid- August. There have been a number of days when the District's own operational targets (a much stricter standard)were not met, but that has been rare. The State's surfzone bathing water standards have been met without exception at 4.5 miles out in the ocean, around our outfall for 200 days. The bacterial counts in Huntington Beach appear to be unaffected by disinfecting our effluent. An evaluation will be done to see if the amount of bleach could be reduced. A presentation will be made at the April Board meeting. D. State Budget Crisis General Manager Blake Anderson reported that there was nothing new to report. Staff _ Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 February 26, 2003 will continue to monitor the situation and notify the Board 9 something occurs that impacts the District. E. Special OMITS Workshop on Asset Management Proposed Staff is recommending that a special OMITS workshop on Asset Management be conducted on March 19 beginning at 5 p.m.to give the directors a better understanding of asset management and the possibilities and costs. This program can substantially reduce our life cycle costs and make us more efficient. An invitation will be extended to all directors to attend this workshop. The Steering Committee agreed with staffs recommendation. F. Directors Compensation Mr. Anderson reported that present directors compensation is set at$170 per meeting as established by resolution adopted in January 2001. State law allows for a 5 percent increase every calendar year, provided the Board adopts an ordinance to do so. Staff was seeking direction on whether to proceed with a new ordinance. The Steering Committee decided that a compensation increase is not appropriate at this time but that it would be revisited annually at its January meeting. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that a detailed outline was included in the directors Board agenda package on changes to the Conflict of Interest provisions of state law. The members of the Steering Committee determined that the existing lists of warrants would be sufficient for checking for individual conflicts for the time being. It was suggested that a reminder to directors to check for possible conflicts of interest be added to agenda reports on new contracts. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. Status of NPDES Permit Renewal and Negotiation Process Bob Ghirelli reported that one of the conditions of the permit renewal for disinfection was that a report would be prepared on various options for disinfection other than bleach. The engineering department is working on the report and will be submitting it to the Regional Board this week. Additional testing will begin this summer. It appears that UV is the prevailing technology. The goal is to move away from bleach and dechlorination. Actual negotiations will get underway once the CIP has been validated and the Board approves the schedule. B. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in March were reviewed. C. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. Mr.Woodruff reported that a bid protest has been received on Item 16. He will be recommending against upholding the protest and explained his reasons. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 February 26, 2003 (9) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Bob Ghirelli said that the final report on the Huntington Beach studies has been moved to April. The presentation will include a video showing fife at the end of the outtall before and after disinfection. He also said that additional work has been planned. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT The General Manager's evaluation, usually scheduled for January, has been on hold awaiting completion of the MOUs with employee organizations. The Steering Committee asked that the evaluation be considered next month and compensation issues be discussed when the MOU process is complete. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 26, 2003 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 26, 2003 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:16 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 (b), 54956.9(a) and 54956.9(c),to discuss three litigation matters. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken on Agenda Items Nos. 13.A.(1), (2)and (3). At 6:45 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Submitted by: ,l��t� 'Acin Tappan r r Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 February 26, 2003 Steering Committee Secretary ' G:MmEIa�aYamieWeenNCanmfieoN4F�'N36]19eeNq CwrvnAea Mvuaezq,c ' Y a. MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, March 5, 2003-5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 5, 2003, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: James M. Ferryman, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Don Bankhead Bob Oolen, Director of Operations & Maintenance Debbie Cook Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Tony Kawashima Mark Esquer Anna Piercy Ed Torres Tod Ridgeway Mike Moore Larry Herman Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Others: Directors Absent: Randy Furhman Jan Vandersloot Carolyn Cavecche (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair had no report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, advised that in April the OMITS Committee would be presented the results of the District's ocean monitoring program. The Committee would also be provided the final results of the Huntington Beach Bacteria Study and the current impacts of the District's disinfection process. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee r Page 2 f March 5, 2003 (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the February 5, 2003 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. b. OMTS03-08 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report,which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. C. OMTS03-09 Receive and file Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance,financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 8(a) and (b) under Consent Calendar. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS03-10 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Phase II Biotdckling Filter for Odor Control Demonstration Project Final Report, prepared by University of California, Riverside dated February 2003. Ed Torres,Air Quality&Special Projects Manager, reported the study has been on-going for a few years. Mr. Torres briefly described the process of the project, the results, and the annual savings in chemical costs to convert chemical scrubbers to biotrickling filters. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. OMTS03-11 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file In-plant Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) Impact Study, prepared by Brown and Caldwell, dated November 2002. Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, described the FOG Study, and outlined various alternatives to treat or dispose of the fats, oils and greases. A cooperative study is underway between the County of Orange and OCSD, to look at FOG Impacts on homes and businesses. It was thought that the County's FOG program would be affected by recent budget cuts. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 March 5, 2003 C. OMTS03-12 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to finalize negotiations and subsequently award a consultant services agreement with Partners Consulting Services, Inc. for Financial Information System Technical Support, Specification No. S-2002-110BD, in an amount not to exceed $180,000, for the period April 1, 2003 through March 31, 2004 with the option of four additional one year renewals. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. d. OMTS03-13 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: 1) Ratify the General Manager's action to issue a purchase order for Fiberglass Reinforced Caustic Storage Tanks, Specification No. E-2003-130, to Xerxes Corporation for an amount not to exceed $67,000; 2) Establish a budget of$280,000 for Treatment Plant No. 2 North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank Replacement providing for the purchase of tanks, associated materials and necessary equipment for the emergency installation of chemical storage tanks; and, 3)Authorize the General Manager to award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder for North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank and Piping Replacement, Specification No. S-2003-131,for an amount not to exceed $140,000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS There were none. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology, provided a brief update on the sound system and ceiling-mounted projectors project in the conference rooms. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance, advised that a request for proposals was issued for an inspection of the District's concrete structures with regard to possible impacts to the structures because of high levels of sulfides. r Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance j and Technical Services Committee Page 4 March 5, 2003 (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services was not in attendance. (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Chair Ferryman requested a report from staff at a future meeting regarding the District's current and future role on the waste discharge regulations (WDR)for sanitary sewers. (14) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING A workshop on Asset Management for the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee is scheduled for March 19, 2003 at 5 p.m., and the next regularly-scheduled meeting will be held on April 2, 2003 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m. Submitted by: &,A" ,Pe Operations, Maintenanc d Technical Services Committee Secretary G:1wp.dwx2genda\OMTS\2003\0303W30503 daft OMTS minutnAw OMTS COMMITTEE Me7ng Uate To edior Dlr. 3/5/03 31 103 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number oMT503-10 12(t) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Air Quality & Special Projects Manager SUBJECT: BIOTRICKLING FILTER FOR ODOR CONTROL DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: PHASE II FINAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Final Report, Phase II Biotrickling Filter for Odor Control Demonstration Project, prepared by University of California, Riverside dated February 2003. SUMMARY • The District's odor control facilities were installed in the mid 1980's. The Odor Control Master Plan recently completed by CH2M Hill recommends replacement of our single stage chemical odor control scrubbers with 2-stage scrubbers which include biotrickling filters. The 2-stage scrubbers will enable the District to reliably prevent nuisance odors from leaving our treatment plant boundaries. Due to our successful biotrickling filter research, Staff is recommending that biotrickling filter technology play a prominent role in our future odor control strategies. • In June 2001, the Board authorized an agreement with University of California, Riverside to assist District's staff researching biotrickling filter odor scrubber technology. To evaluate the technology, staff proposed to retrofit an existing chemical odor scrubber at Plant No. 1 to a biotrickling filter, and evaluate the treatment performance, process reliability, and obtain capital and operating cost data associated with treatment of hydrogen sulfide, odors and volatile organic compounds. • Biotrickling filters remove odors using microorganisms that live on the packing media without the use of chemicals required by the Districts present scrubber technology. One part of the research was to develop faster treatment technology for biotrickling filters to make them competitive with traditional chemical scrubbers. Biological treatment systems typically require 20 to 60 seconds of treatment time versus 2 seconds for chemical scrubbers, thus requiring much larger land space for treatment. 1 'r • A key to the research was the use of an innovative foam packing material used in the scrubber conversion. This foam packing, along with optimum environmental conditions for the microorganisms have enabled the biotrickling filters to treat the odors at 2 seconds treatment time, which is the same as chemical scrubbers. The 2-second treatment time is the key to reducing this technologies capital cost. • The Phase II biotrickling filter for odor control research was completed in October 2002. The final report describes the scrubber conversion process; treatment performance and contain conclusions and recommendations. Key conclusions and recommendations from this research are listed below: Major Report Conclusions: 1) Biotrickling filters can reliably remove hydrogen sulfide at equal or better performance than traditional chemical scrubbers. 2) Biotrickling filters can also remove other pollutants of concern including odors, volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants. Further study of conditions that would improve odor removal is needed. 3) Conversion of a chemical scrubber to a biotrickling filter is cost effective. In- house conversion cost for scrubber 10 at Plant 1 was $21,000. Conversion costs using an outside contractor is estimated not to exceed $50,000. 4) Estimated annual savings cost in chemicals and O&M labor and material ranges from $40,000 to $70,000 for each conversion, which would equate to a payback period of approximately 1 year. WHAT'S NEXT • At their October 2002 Meeting, the Board approved an agreement with University of California, Riverside to conduct a Phase III Biotrickling Filter Demonstration Study to address the recommendations contained in the Phase II Report. The maior features of the Phase III Biotrickling Filter Research are: 1) Further study environmental conditions that would improve removal of odors, and the effect of these conditions on hydrogen sulfide removal. 2) Evaluate the performance and pressure loss using a structured foam packing to reduce energy requirements due to higher than expected pressure losses through the biotrickling filter. Three (3) additional chemical scrubbers will be retrofitted to biotrickling filters using the structured foam packing. • The results of this research are being used as a basis for odor control for the Plant No. 2 Headwork project (P2-66) and several scrubber complex rehabilitation projects that will begin over the next 2 years. 2 Biotricking filters will likely be applied to foul air streams with high HzS concentrations and/or with principally organic based odors coming from solids treatment processes. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No new authorization of expenditures is being requested at this time. A summary of the project budget is listed below: Project Description Budget Phase I: Pilot-Scale Stud $ 25,000 Phase Il: Demonstration-Scale Stud $450,000 Phase III: Demonstration-Scale Stud $285,000 Total Project Cost $735,000 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Board approved budget on 10/23102.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Due to the excellent treatment performance and chemical savings resulting from the conversion of Plant No. 1 scrubber 10 to a biotrickling filter, staff retrofitted four(4) additional Plant No. 2 scrubbers to biotrickling filters. UC Riverside assisted staff in evaluating the treatment performance and reliability of these four additional biotrickling filters. Costs for the conversions are included in the Phase II: Demonstration-Scale Study budget. The Biotridding Filter for Odor Control Demonstration Project: Phase II Final Report is on file with the Board Secretary. An Executive Summary of the Report is included as an attachment to this Agenda Report. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENT Final Report: Biotrickling Filter Demonstration Project— Phase II Executive Summary 3 Final Report Executive Summary Phase II Biotrickling Filter for Odor Control Demonstration Project February 2003 Prepared by Marc A.Deshusses and David Gabriel Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering University of California, Riverside for Orange County Sanitation District yJ P EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) previously funded a study at UC Riverside to evaluate the feasibility of converting selected chemical scrubbers at OCSD to biological trickling filters. The results were very promising, and suggested that a number of scrubbers at either Plant 1 or Plant 2 could possibly be converted with significant cost and health and safety savings. Thus the objectives of Phase II were: 1. To refine the scrubber conversion procedure and costs to convert a scrubber. 2. To develop a monitoring protocol and apply it towards the evaluation of the biotrickling filter. This includes extended monitoring over time, and under a wide range of operating conditions. 3. To perform a detailed cost-benefit analysis of the converted scrubbers and to the extent possible to other scrubbers at OCSD. 4. To write a report with the findings and recommendations. As the work progressed,4 more scrubber were converted by OCSD personnel and additional objectives were identified which included: 5. Perform selected analyses on scrubbers I, Q, G, and J that were converted at Plant 2. 6. Perform selected experiments to understand the limits and performance of the biotrickling fitters. Overall,the project was extremely successful. The focus of the monitoring efforts was on biotrickling filter 10 which successfully treated 10,000 ctm of foul air for over 18 months keeping the original gas contact time of the scrubber of 1.6.2.3 seconds.Typical results are shown in Figures 1 through 4. Reclaimed water was used as nutrient source for the process and for maintaining the pH in the biotrickling filter between 1.5 and 2.2. Under these conditions, the biotrickling filter was able to successfully treat H2S at rates comparable to those of chemical scrubbers. HZS removal in biotrickling filter 10 was in excess of 98%for inlet H2S concentrations as high as 30 to 50 ppmv. This corresponds to volumetric elimination rates of HZS of 95 to 105 g H2S m''h". The performance of biotrickling fitter I at Plant 2 was also very high. Simultaneously to HiS treatment, removal of 30-70%of odors, reduced sulfur compounds (RSCs), ammonia and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and air toxks present in traces in the foul air was also observed (see Table 1). H2S treatment performance in biotrickling filters 10 and I was exceptionally high compared with other biofilters or biotrickling fitters removing low concentration of HzS, even at higher gas contact times. We determined that a combination of high pollutant mass transfer rate due to the special packing support that was used and optimum operating conditions (nutrient, pH, COz) was responsible for the unprecedented performance. „ 100 100 o..y a s a5 10c1emm, ro aecvd.ql � 50 g0.1 Y .. fT�•M.y* a y"s,y �t t:�"+ye•:i ?. �",. 0.01 0 1 2 Time(d) Figure 1. Typical H2S removal in biotrickling filter 10. Time zero corresponds to 12:00 AM on September 5. 2001.Note the log scale for H2S concentration.Also,non-detect(ND)by V APEX is shown as 0.01 ppm,.. 100 Init .` i•i• 'K �... � '•• Remova ' 6 10 7 i e ' eta ..t 6 o 1 4 a _ Outlet - 3 '• 0.1 — — 2 0.01 0 07/19/01 09/07/01 10/27/01 12/16/01 Time (date) Figure 2. Long-tern performance of biotrickling filter 10. H:S removal efficiency, pH, inlet and outlet concentrations are shown. High pH events are either experiments or control system upsets. /r 1 220 100 200 00 180 60 6 60 40 20 N 14 - 0 _ 3 0 20 Q 60 20 100 120 IQ160 1W 12 H,Sload(g H1Sm4W) 100 so 60 m 40 20 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 180 180 HrS load(g HIS m4 h"1) Figure 3. 4rination capacity of H_S (_ (concentration in-out)xair flow/bed volume) and removal efficiency versus inlet bead (inset) in the biotrickflng filter. Data include more than 8 months of continuous operation. Loadings above 110 g H:S m-'h'i were achieved by spiking the inlet air with H:S from a compressed gas cylinder. Inlet —e—Outlet —Removal Efficiency 200 100 175 90 Removal 80 _ E 150 n 70 125 60 c ° .9 100 Inlet 50 2 m 75 40 � 0 N 50 30 E ¢ Outie 20 ¢ 25 10 0 0 6-6-02 6-7-02 6-8-02 6-9-02 6.10-02 6-11-02 6-12-02 Tim (date) Figure 4. 6 days of typical H,S removal in biotrickling filter L V Table 1 Inlet concentrations and removal efficiencies of odor,VOCs and RSCs from biouickling filter 10. Data are mean ±standard deviation, n=21 fm RSCs and n=9 for odor panels and are representative from about 8 months of operation at gas contact times between 1.6 and 3.4 seconds.Off a dilution-to-threshold as measured by standard odor panel. Inlet Removal Compound concentration,ppb,. efficiency,% Carbonyl sulfide 67.2±7.7 44± 11 Methyl mercaptan 192.5±34.1 67±11 Carbon disulfide 70.3±20.5 35±5 Methylene chloride 132 36 Chlomform 326 30 Benzene 147 32 TCE 16 46 PCE 224 28 Toluene 753 29 Ethyl benzene 148 41 p and m-xyiene 480 41 o-xylene 110 44 Odor 1980±480 Dfr 65±21 From the 18 month study,the following conclusions could be made. 1. The conversion of a chemical scrubber to a biotrickling filter is a relatively simple procedure. The costs associated with the conversion are mostly (-50%) associated with the purchase and shipping of the new packing that needs to be installed. For scrubber 10, the total estimated cost (i.e., pans and personnel) for the conversion by in-house personnel was about$21,000. The estimated cost of the conversion if performed by an outside contractor was about$50,000. 2. The scrubbers converted to biotrickling filters exhibited H,S removal performance largely exceeding the predictions of Phase I. Sustained removal of H,S with over 95% efficiency was achieved most of the time for biotrickling filter 10 at Plant 1, while biotrickling filter I at Plant 2, exposed to higher H,S concentrations, exhibited high rate of H,S degradation but partial removal. Biotrickling filter 10 had a maximum H,S elimination capacity of about 105 g m' h-', while biotrickfing filter I achieved elimination capacities over 250 g rnf h" without reaching its maximum limit.These are truly unprecedented performances. We determined that the very high air velocity in the biotrickling filter contributed to high external H,S mass transfer coefficients, thereby allowing such high H,S removal rates to be achieved. 3. Stable and sustained H2S removal was obtained at operating pHs of 1.8 to 2.2.Treatment at neutral pH was attempted but failed. However, the results were considered to be inconclusive, as the experiment was possibly affected by the excess free chlorine fed to the biotrickling filter during neutral pH operation. 4. Biotrickling filter 10 was subject to intense monitoring which revealed that it always met the AQMD discharge requirement(<1 ppm H,S averaged over 24 h). 5. Removal of VOCs. RSCs and odors other than HrS was not the primary objective of this phase of the study. Still, extended monitoring showed that these contaminants existed in traces (ppb levels) and that their removal ranged from about 30-70%, and was very variable. Removal of RSCs required about 2 months of acclimation. 6. The biotrickling filter exhibited a larger pressure drop (5-IO" water column) than the former scrubbers. This is clearly because the new packing has a larger surface area, but is possibly also increased by packing compaction at the bottom of the bed.Testing structured foam is recommended. I ; 1. The live biotrickling filters had less than 10 system upsets in 18 months of operation. In two or three instances, biotrickling filter 10 or I lost its H2S removal efficiency. The most likely explanation was that over chlorinated plant water was fed and deactivated the biotrickling filter process culture. Another instance could be traced to acidic foam carryover from another scrubber. Thus, upsets were always due to a reason exterior to the biotrickling filtration process itself, suggesting that the process is stable and very reliable. 2. The biotrickling filters required little maintenance (although maintenance efforts were not quantitatively monitored). Their control was simple, and the biotrickling filter did not need any nutrients or chemicals other than plant water. This all contributes to a very positive cost-benefit outcome. 3. The biotrickling filter responded rapidly to changing conditions. Also, no marked effect on the performance could be found after periods of up to 48 hours' starvation. 4. A detailed cost-benefit analysis of convening scrubber 10 to a biotrickling filter revealed that conversion resulted in substantial savings. When compared directly to the parallel scrubber (scrubber 9), the savings amounted to $14,000 per year, mostly from reduced chemicals use. Since the biotrickling filter outperformed the chemical scrubber, the cost-benefit analysis also considered the expense associated with the post-treatment of the untreated fraction of H2S from the chemical scrubber 9. Another scenario considered the benefit of having biotrickling filter 10 over having no roughing treatment. In all these cases, total savings ranged from $40,000 to $70,000 per year. The benefits of not having chemicals on-site were not included, but are significant from a health and safety perspective. Overall, the cost-benefit analysis indicates that converting scrubbers is a highly beneficial innovation. The study led to the following general recommendations. 1. Since biotrickling filtration proved very effective, reliable, and economically favorable, further conversions should be considered. In particular scrubbers 9 and H appear to be very good candidates.Also,biouickling filters should be included in future odor control plans. 2. Operation of the biotrickling filters at pH lower than 1.5-1.8 is not recommended,since low pH can possibly damage the packing over time. 3. Low trickling rates are recommended as excess watering increases pressure drop and may affect removal. 4. Future biotrickling filters should include some system to neutralize chlorine in plant water prior to feeding to the biotrickling filter or an alarm if excessive levels are seen in plant water. Further,for Phase HI,the recommendations are: 5. Future conversion(s)should focus on testing a structured foam(i.e.,cut-to-shape), as it may result in lower pressure drops and possibly even higher pollutant elimination capacities. 6. Another experiment at neutral pH should be conducted,with a chlorine neutralizer on the plant water feed. 7. The study of the effect of air residence time on RSCs,VOCs, and odor removal should be conducted over an extended period of time, so that multiple sampling over time under a wide range of conditions can be accomplished. 8. Phase III should focus on the many issues associated with residunl odor as these are key for the implementation of bionickling filters for second stage treatment. OMTS COMMITTEE Meetlngoate Toea 0FD 61031r 03/05/03 03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number item Number OMTS03-11 I iz a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Barbara Collins, Principal Analyst SUBJECT: IN-PLANT FATS, OILS, AND GREASE (FOG) IMPACT REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the In—Plant Fats, Oils and Grease Impact Study prepared by Brown and Caldwell dated November 2002. SUMMARY • In April 2002, the California Regional Water Control Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB) issued Order No. R8-2002.0014 General Waste Discharge Requirements, requiring Orange County cities and wastewater treatment agencies to monitor and control sanitary sewer overflows (SSO's) in response to a Grand Jury Report of April 2001 that stated that fats, oils, and grease were major contributors to SSO's. The Order named the District as a co-permittee with member cities and as the lead to "facilitate regional compliance" with the Order. • In response to this order, the District and cities in the service area initiated the FOG Control Program which can eventually reduce the amount of fats, oils, and grease discharged into the sewers that substantially increase the FOG's hauled as septage to the District's Reclamation Plant No. 1. • The FOG Program will develop options for removal of grease from the collection system which may include requiring restaurants to use grease interceptors that are drained by septage haulers and brought to the District as septage. • The purpose of this report is to study and estimate the impact on the impact on the District's treatment plant of a potential increase in septage haulers from the present 40 trucks per day up to to160 trucks per day at peak. The septage trucks discharge fats, oils and greases at a waste hauler station located at Reclamation Plant No. 1. • In June 2002, the District Board authorized OCSD to hire a consultant to determine the potential impacts on the treatment plant. The evaluation of alternatives included impacts to plant operations, maintenance, staffing, traffic, economics (capital costs) and the environment. C�u.f ,.enE MI..MWODU(BFEVIem 12(J).F00 Rp .A. ftN Wwo Page 1 - r • As part of the Order, cities and wastewater agencies will develop a FOG control plan by conducting a study to evaluate FOG control technologies, practices and programs. • The In-Plant FOG Impact Study identifies alternative disposal and recycling options for handling FOG in the future and assesses in-plant impacts of receiving greater quantities of FOG. • The seven alternatives developed by Brown and Caldwell for treating or disposing of FOG at the District are: - Alternative 1 - Continue the present practice of the onsite digestion of the fats, oils and greases with the sewer sludge. A. Continue the Current Operation — Process the increased fats, oils and grease received from septage (waste haulers) along with wastewater solids. B. Modified Liquid Receiving— Construct a new septage (Waste hauler) station with a solid/grit removal dewatering system to remove the expected increased gritty material with the increased fats, oils and grease material to be processed. C. Modified Liquid Receiving and Thickening—Construct a new receiving station (Alt. 1 B) with heated sludge blending tank to receive all the increased septage and all the process solids prior to digestion. D. Dedicated Digestion— Pump all fats, oils and greases directly into a digester dedicated to treat only the fats, oils and greases. (This has been successfully piloted at the District.) - Alternative 2 - Offsite treatment of the fats, oils and greases at a rendering facility) - Alternative 3-Offsite recycling of the fats, oils and greases to produce a clean burning biofuel. - Alternative 4 - Offsite disposal of the fats, oils and greases at a Landfill. • The alternatives were ranked based on various treatment plant impacts. The ranking results concluded that Alternative 3 is the best which is to recycle the fats, oils and greases and produce clean.buming fuel. (This alternative is the only alternative with zero costs to the District.) • The risk associated with Alternative 3 depends upon developmental technology. C.Mmuments and RWngdpope4ccel Senn,Temporary Immnet FllesbLKVF tem 12,)SO RWnAm Re„. d1p9a Page 2 I The Consultant recommends that a dedicated digester for fats, oils and greases be implemented until pilot testing and market analysis of Alternative 3 is completed. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY NA BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Une item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The report is on file and available through the Board Secretary's office. ALTERNATIVES NA CEOA FINDINGS NA ATTACHMENTS NA C:Tm� eM WTOLYVRtem IEQRW Repro AW RW.e : aimse Page 3 an og T r 1510 2OMTS COMMTEE " m3 3610 r,_rbvNumW 2W AGENDA REPORT OMT m1 S03-12 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Originator: Robert Thiede, Principal Analyst— Information Technology SUBJECT: Agreement Providing Financial Information System (FIS) Technical Support - Specification Number S-2002-110BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to finalize negotiations and subsequently award a consulting services contract with Partners Consulting Services, Inc. for Financial Information System Technical Support, Specification No. S-2002-110131), in an amount not to exceed$180,000, for the period April 1, 2003 through March 31, 2004 with the option of four additional one year renewals. SUMMARY • The District's FIS provides an integrated system for the input, processing and tracking of financial data. The system is used District-wide to provide processes such as; Financial Reporting, Employee Payroll, Requisitioning, Purchasing, Human Resources and Budgeting. • Following the initial implementation of our FIS system in 1999 a need for outside advanced technical and functional support was identified and budgeted. • The Board approved a one year sole source contract for these services in June 2000 and again in June 2001. • In June 2002 a decision was made to bid out these services. To meet existing support needs, an interim agreement was issued to Partners Consulting for these services. • A Request for Proposal to provide advanced technical help desk support was issued in October 2002. • The Request for Proposal adhered to established formal bidding requirements with five respondents submitting proposals for this service. f • In January 2003, a five-member panel representing the Information Technology and Finance departments reviewed all proposals submitted and conducted interviews with the two most responsive respondents (Partners Consulting Services, Inc. and Systime). Partners Consulting Services, Inc. was selected as the best overall respondent. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The service contract will not exceed $180,000 for the period April 1, 2003 through March 31, 2004. The total approved line item budget for this service for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 is $225,000 of which approximately $100,000 remains. A request for approval for$225,000 for these continued services will appear in the Fiscal Year 2003/20004 budget. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item Expense Section 5— Page 10 Professional Services— FIS Support) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As previously mentioned, the need for advanced support was recognized from the time of the initial implementation. Initially, functional support (applications, approvals, reporting and output support) services were required on a five days per week basis. The District also recognized the need to become more self reliant on supporting the FIS system. The trend toward self-supporting can be seen in the amount of outside services necessary. From the initial five days per week needed the agency was able to move to a four days per week schedule in calendar year 2000. In 2001 the number was reduced to three days per week. In 2002 while the number of days remained at three days per week, the scope of services provided grew to include on-site technical (hardware and configuration issues) support capabilities. The current level of support will remain necessary for the next year. This is primarily due to the number of District resources required to complete the current migration to the enhanced JD Edwards OneWorld Xe (OWXe) product. The migration began in July 2002 and has a scheduled completion date in February 2004. The amount requested for this agreement reflects meeting the estimated need of on-site support three days per week plus 2 additional days per month as needed. At the completion of the migration project, support levels will be re-evaluated and identified to meet the ongoing needs of the agency. i The Bidding Process The services specified on the RFP were to provide on site advanced JD Edwards World and OneWorid support as directed by the OCSD Project Manager. The services outlined included additional tasks and responsibilities related to the efforts to migrate the current FIS system to the OWXe version. The request for proposal resulted in five viable responses. • The respondents' proposals were then judged by a panel comprised of senior Information Technology and Finance staff and management. • The proposals were rated qualifications, staffing, project organization, completeness and feasibility of approach. Pricing was deliberately omitted during this process. • Once ranked, the panel met to discuss findings and reveal pricing. • Pricing was requested on a flat hourly rate. Responses ranged from $111.00 per hour to $168.00 per hour. The selected vendor's (Partners Consulting) rate is $120.00 per hour • The panel interviewed the two companies rated the highest based on ranking and price. • After completing the interviews, the panel concluded that the proposal from Partners Consulting best met the needs of the District. ALTERNATIVES • Contract on a per incident arrangement. • This would be more time consuming and costly. • Hire additional staff. • At our current status, definitive long tens needs cannot be assessed accurately. CEGA FINDINGS OMITS COMMITTEE weebig Date TOBtl.of'3r. 03/06/03 03/26/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OKTS03-13 12(fi Orange County Sanitation Distrid FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Michelle Hetherington, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 NORTH AND SOUTH SCRUBBER COMPLEX CAUSTIC TANK REPLACEMENT(S) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Establish a budget of$230,000 for Treatment Plant No. 2 North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank Replacement providing for the purchase of tanks, associated materials and necessary equipment for the emergency installation of chemical storage tanks; and, 2. Ratify use of General Managers emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for Purchase Order No. 37161 issued to Xerxes Corporation for Fiberglass Reinforced Caustic Storage Tanks, Specification No. E-2003-130, for an amount not to exceed $67,000; and, 3. Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for Purchase Order No. 37246 issued to Jamison Engineering for North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank and Piping Replacement, Specification No. S-2003-131, for an amount not to exceed $89,689. SUMMARY • At the beginning of February 2003, staff discovered a leak in a chemical caustic soda storage tank at an odor scrubber complex at Treatment Plant No. 2. Staff carefully inspected the other caustic soda chemical storage tanks and found another tank with a similar leak. Staff contacted a fiberglass repair company that determined the tanks were not repairable because of their age and special construction (double wall and heating coils). • Staff issued an emergency purchase order for the two chemical storage tanks due to the six to eight week lead time for tank delivery and urgent need to replace them to effectively add chemical to the system. • It is requested that the General Manager be granted the authority to award a contract to expedite the chemical tank construction to get the chemical system operable as soon as possible. • District staff has written a project scope, prepared sketches, and a specification to receive competitive quotes from three contractors for Spec. No. S-2003-131, the North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank and Piping Replacement. • To expedite the completion of the tank installation, District staff utilized the emergency bidding process and received competitive bids from three contractors: ➢ S. & S. Mechanical $136,883 ➢ Filanc $103.367 ➢ Jamison Engineering $ 89,689 • It is requested that the General Manager be granted the authority to award a contract to expedite the construction of the chemical tanks and the implementation of the system as soon as possible. District staff wrote a project scope, prepared sketches, and a specification to receive informal competitive quotes from three contractors for Spec. No. S-2003-131, the North and South Scrubber Complex Caustic Tank and Piping Replacement. • It is estimated that the facilities will be back online by end of May 2003. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The capital budget being requested is $230,000. This budget amount includes two tanks, installation, staff resources and a contingency for unknowns. The cost of the tanks is $67,000, installation of the tanks and piping is approximately $90,000, staffing is estimated at $33,000, and a contingency of$40,000 for an estimated total of $230,000. The cost of this replacement was not budgeted in the current fiscal year. However, the current outlay of funds will not exceed the capital budget. Therefore, there is adequate funding to cover this expenditure. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted ❑ Not applicable (information item) CMocumenls and Settingstpopelocal Settings\Temporary Internet HeMOLKYB[tem 12(q.Caustic Tanks 1.doc Revised: 8120101 Page 2 ,y. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES Rent Temporary Tanks Rental tanks are available but are not recommended because the cost is prohibitive and will exceed the cost of a new tank in 2 years, 4 months. In addition, caustic tanks require heat tracing to keep the chemical from crystallizing during the colder months. Heat tracing is unavailable with rental tanks and the rental tanks are not of equal quality to the new fiberglass tanks. Therefore, staff does not recommend this alternative. Purchase chemical in tote bins The cost of purchasing chemical in tote bins is 211 percent more than buying bulk chemical. In addition, tote bins are labor intensive to handle due to the need to change tanks throughout the day. This option also increases the risk of staff exposure to corrosive chemicals. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None MAE/MRH:ct/pjm CADowments and setfingslpopeLLoeal setdnoffemporery Internet FIIeMOMFE\Item 12(r.Caustic Tanks t.d= Revised: srzorol Page 3 1 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, March 6,2003, at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Brian Donahue, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Alice Jempsa, Vice Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Patty Campbell Maintenance John Collins John Linder, Construction Manager Patsy Marshall Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Robert McGowan Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Norm Eckenrode Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Ed Torres, Engineering Manager, O&M Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair William Cassidy, Project Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Beth Krom OTHERS PRESENT: Randy Fuhnnan (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman expressed concern that, according to staff, changes to pathogen reduction would be delayed until secondary is on line. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Donahue did not make a report. I PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 March 6, 2003 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that SCCRW P will be making a two-hour presentation on regional studies that they have made. It is scheduled for 12:30 p.m.on Friday, March 8, here at the District. Mr.Anderson reported that Rep. Maddox has agreed to sponsor ACA 11 that will amend Proposition 218 to allow the District to increase user fees for urban runoff treatment costs. Scott Baugh is working on getting additional support. Mr. Anderson also reported that there is no additional news on the state budget crisis at this time. Staff will continue to monitor actions in Sacramento. (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin reported that there will be an orientation for new directors on March 13 at 10 a.m. Other members of the committee are welcome to attend. He will be reviewing routine Engineering Department policies and procedures. Mr. Ludwin also provided an update on the SARI relocation and protection project. The design engineer has completed the analysis of the alternatives and is incorporating final comments into the Engineering Report. This information will be provided to the Joint Management Committee at its next meeting on March 18. He also reported that there have been conversations with the Corps of Engineers, OC PFRD, County of Riverside and SAW PA on the project. The Corps will be completing the environmental work on the project and OC PFRD will be paying for it. As a result, the District will be canceling its contract with ESA, our environmental consultant. Mr. Ludwin also stated that OC PFRD will be taking on the construction of and payment for the project. There are still many details to work out,and an agreement will be developed outlining the responsibilities of all the affected agencies. The project will remain budgeted such that it could be constructed by the District if necessary. We are still trying to get paid by SAW PA for the work already done. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (8) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-I) Brian Donahue asked that(8)b. be pulled from the consent calendar for additional discussion. It was moved, seconded and duly carried. a. RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the February 6, 2002 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. C. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Attached is the PSA and Addenda Report. This is an information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 March 6,2003 separately. There were no PSAs and one Addendum approved by the General Manager from November 22, 2002 through January 23, 2003. d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only hem. e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only Rem. I. PDC03-10 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61,with Manuel Brothers, Inc., authorizing an addition of$57,085, increasing the total contract amount to$300,585; and (2)Accept Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. g PDC03-11 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers, and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13,for additional design engineering services,for an additional amount of $10,890, Increasing the total amount not to exceed $142,677. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 8.(a) through (g), excepting 8.(b), under Consent Calendar. b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached is the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an information only Item. Action an change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There Is one change order this month for PDC Committee approval. Brian Donahue questioned that project that had a 47 percent change order. John Linder described the additional work on the purchasing building and said that the project was still on the list because of problems with the contractor. Director Anderson complimented staff on using pictures in the agenda report for work on a change order. It made the change easier to envision. Item (8)b.)was moved,seconded and approved. PDC Committee Minutes y Page 4 March 6, 2003 (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-b) a. PDC03-12 Blotrickling Filter for Odor Control Demonstration Project: Phase II Final Report Ed Torres described the use of biofiltration for odor control and reported on the results received to date. The report has been completed and the results are promising. He reported on the costs for retrofitting as well as potential savings. To date,four additional towers have been retrofitted. Staff is evaluating how to Improve the operating conditions. These improvements will be Incorporated in upcoming projects,as the retrofitted towers have been operating for over two years and results have been consistently good. There are plans to retrofit all 35 odor control towers. AQMD Is looking at this technology as BACT for volatile organic compounds. b. P0003-13 Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of the A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49 Jim Herberg reported that the Negative Declaration on this project will be considered bythe Directors at the March Board Meeting. He reviewed the comments received on the document and gave an overview of the project. The members of the Committee agreed that a Negative Declaration was appropriate. (10) ACTION ITEM (Item a) a. PDC03-14 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Plrnie for Central Generation Automation,Job No. J-79, providing for additional engineering services for an amount of$192,829, increasing the total amount not to exceed$446,064. David Ludwin described the project and the need for additional services. He also stated that the construction budget will need to be revised when the results of the testing are known. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Plmie for Central Generation Automation, Job No.J-79, providing for additional engineering services for an amount of$192,829, Increasing the total amount not to exceed $446,064. (11) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. ' PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 March 6, 2003 (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 3, 2003 at 5 p.m. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Submitted by: llt� lvy`� Je n tappan P ommittee Secretary G4A�W„M19�DP2W]N4ninm'YAfiOJ PCL I.im,l®.0.s PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.or Dlr. 3/6/03 3/26/03 AGENDA REPORT IIem NUmber Rem Number PDC03-10 13(0 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: FIBER OPTICS EXTENSION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. SP2000-61 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, with Manuel Brothers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $57,085, increasing the total contract amount to $300,585; and (2) Accept Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY • This project is an extension of the backbone fiber optic network cabling at Plant No. 2 • Tran Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Manuel Brothers, Inc. on May 22, 2002. • Item 1 of this Change Order includes costs to modify the duct bank depth to bypass undisclosed utilities and changed conditions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date August 19, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date November 26, 2002 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date November 26, 2002 Actual Completion Date November 26, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Change Order No. 1 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Modify Duct Bank Cross Section $43,985 0 Changed Condition and Alignment 2 Provide Power to Remote 1/0 $13,100 0 Design Change Panels, Add Concrete Pedestals, and Upgrade Fittings Total Change Order No. 1 $67 085 0 R.I.:VIM Page 1 Job Completion The project is now complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $243,500.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Pedusf) $ 57,085.00 Change Orders to Date $ 57,085.00 Percentage Increase to Date 23.44% Amended Contract Price $300,585.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8 - Page 139) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Funds in the amount of $5,000 are reallocated from Design Staff to Construction Inspection for staff labor to complete the project. There is no change in the total project budget. Please refer to the Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS This project was not included in a previously approved Master Plan/EIR. This project is exempt per CECIA Guideline Section 15302 for Facilities Engineering Projects at Plant No. 2. A Notice of Exemption was filed on November 22, 2000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Photo Description of Change Order No. 1, Item No. 1 UM:dm GAn1g1obaMgenda Draft Reports\PDC\SP20D061 AR COM and COA 032603.dm Re—d enasa Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE FIBER OPTICS EXTENSION AT PLANT NO.2 JOB NO.SP200D41 d4 =om� IBfj •WH60.6f•VM0.1mf POaoer 'B'�urtlron® WhimRzaTbl) WmT4L.0 e L rises. ,% €,,P. f 26m S ACM 20 f "m 3 II ISW 5 f �� W= s <S.WJs Y745 B'e CBMIRFWr�LOWRN IW WJ S24IM f RS.WJ .% 'HB.Yq S].089 SN5B5 f 2C3 BI•n Cwalry MminOo.n s 5= S e.ro] 3 om ±e S 3 &N5 Y T BB•: rotry Wn i cron 5 $ E Wo 4000 80+: Cobi a 0': vROJmi10TaL Y I... $ aW.CM Y 3 aN.M E Wl.Y E SIM $ New E 310.5W W4 RNnWb C -- E -Is I I H 1 Y Y ON vR ECTNET E 125Am S G M E 3 <WFM ': S 421,5 E W.0f5 S 3]BSW S 510.5W B2': CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT FIBER OPTICS EXTENSION AT PLANT NO.2 JOB NO.SP2000-61 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME REM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 5@2/2002 $ 263,500 $ 203.500 0.00% 100 100 CONO.f'_ Pe�ln " e'5 '. 'e57085 30U` 23u14°6 ;`0 .: '♦1>Zf... Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Manuel Brothers Inc. C.O. No.: One 0 Date: March 26, 2003 Job: Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Se&r4 $57.065.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract andlor contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to ordeductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —MODIFY DUCT BANK CROSS SECTION AND ALIGNMENT This item is for labor, material, and equipment to modify the duct bank cross section and associated work to bypass undisclosed utilities between the Secondary Clarifiers and Surge Towers 1 and 2. Work included the following: A. The depth of the dud bank from station 00+00 to 02+30 vas reduced from 21 inches (2)2 conduit layout)to 12 inches (4x1 conduit layout)to bypass existing piping. The dud bank . reinforcement was modified to suit the new cross section. Additional potholing vas required to locate utilities that were not shown on the contract drawings. Sprinkler piping along the modified duct bank alignment was also relocated. Cost of this Change is $28,185.00. B. Additional asphalt paving and base (approx. 700 sq. feet) was removed and replaced due to the increase in trench width. Cost of this change is $9,400.00. C. A pull box was added to accommodate for proper installation of fiber optics. Cost of this change is $6,400.00. This work was not included the contract documents and vas accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Division 1, Section 48.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 1 and Manuel Brothers Inc.'s Letter Dated January6, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $43.985.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 !f ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Manuel Brothers Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: March 26, 2003 Job: Fiber Optics E)dension at Plant No. 2. Job No. SP2000-61 Consultant: Tran Consulting Enaineers ITEM 2—PROVIDE POWER TO REMOTE 1/0 PANELS, ADD CONCRETE PEDESTALS, AND UPGRADE FITTINGS This item is for labor, material, and equipment for the following work: A. Provide power to remote 1/0 panels- Pover was provided to the remote 1/0 panels at Surge Towers 1 and 2 from the Sampler Building. Work included adding a 2-inch conduit and required wiring to the 1/0 panels from the breaker inside the Sampler Building. Cost ofthis Change is $5,200.00. B. Add concrete pedestals to remote 1/0 panels-Two concrete pedestals were added to the TDU units and remote VO panels at Surge Towers 1 and 2. The pedestals were added to provide access to the units during inclement weather. Cost of this change is $4,500.00. C. PVC coated fittings—The fittings to conduit runs were upgraded from rigid galvanized to PVC coated rigid galvanized to meet District standards. Cost ofthis Change is$3,400.00. This work was not included the contract documents and was accomplished by the Contractors force account pursuant to Division 1, Section 48.B.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 1 and Manuel Brothers Inc.'s Letter Dated January6, 2003. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,100.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $57,085.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days y Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Manuel Brothers Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: March 26, 2003 Job: Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2. Job No SP2000-61 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perbrmed incidental to the prime vmrk and within the time allotted for the original Contract and anyextensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therebre mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 19, 2002 Original Contract Time: 100 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 26, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: N/A Revised Final Completion Due Date: N/A Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: November 26, 2002 Original Contract Price $243,500.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Sedust) $ 57,085.00 Amended Contract Price $ 300,585.00 i Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Manuel Brothers Inc. C.O. No.: One 0 Date: March 26, 2003 Job: Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2. Job No. SP2000-61 Consultant Tran Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: March 26, 2003 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, P.E. Engineering and Construction Manager Date Approved by: David Ludwin P.E. Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Manuel Brothers, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS 00374 17 PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng Date TOBE.Of Dlr. 03/06/03 03/26/03 AGENDA REPORT Iem Number Iem Number PO Numb 13fO) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Larry Rein, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWERS, AND CONSTRUCTION OF WATSON AVENUE SEWER AND CALIFORNIA STREET SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-13 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers, and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, for additional design engineering services, for an additional amount of $10,890, increasing the total amount not to exceed $142,677. SUMMARY • This project will abandon two of the oldest Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) sewers in Costa Mesa. The sewers were constructed in the 1940s and are deteriorated to a condition where they can not be maintained. • The Airbase Trunk Sewers are no longer needed as trunk sewers since the construction of the Fairview Trunk Sewer and the Gisler-Baker Trunk Sewer. • For purposes of coordinating this project with City of Costa Mesa Capital Improvements, the construction phase has been split into three sub-projects. One of these sub-projects is completed, 6-13-2, one will be completed this fall, 6-13-1, and the last one will be completed next spring, 6-13-3. • Separate CIP budgets were established for each sub-project to fund construction costs. The CIP Budget for this project was retained to fund engineering design and professional construction support costs only. • The sub-projects are within the City of Costa Mesa and the City requirements have changed. The City of Costa Mesa has requested modification be made to the contract document requirements for pavement replacement. • Additional engineering services are necessary to modify the contract documents to meet City of Costa Mesa requirements and to incorporate new OCSD requirements for storm water runoff control. • Additional engineering services are also necessary for construction support for the remaining two sub-projects. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of $10,890 is being requested to fund Addendum No. 3. No increase in total project funds is required. See attached Budget Information Table. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT This agreement has no impact on the Budget. ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item FY 2002-03, Section 8, Page 32: Capital Improvement Program, Collections Facilities, Abandonment of AB Trunk, Watson and Cal. Sewers, Contract No. 06-13) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor and the Fairview Trunk Sewer, in the 1990s, made it feasible to abandon the Airbase Trunk Sewers. The Airbase Trunk Sewers constructed circa 1940s, can no longer be maintained due to structural deterioration. Lack of maintenance is causing odor problems. The design work began in 1994, but the work has been delayed due to various problems including the inability to coordinate the project with local street work. These problems have been resolved by time and by subdividing the work. There are three separate segments of the Airbase Trunk Sewers that are being abandoned along with three separate means of constructing replacement sewers to provide local service once the sewers are abandoned. Since each of these segments has separate timing considerations, the project was divided into three capital budgets (Contract Nos. 6-13-1, 6-13-2, & 6-13-3) for construction purposes only. The design work and engineering support is under Contract No. 6-13. One segment of the abandonment work has been completed, another segment will be completed this fall, and the final segment will be completed next spring. This addendum will enable us to provide the engineering support needed to stay on schedule. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives were considered. If the Airbase Trunk Sewers are not abandoned, they will require major rehabilitation work and will continue to require period maintenance. The sewers are not needed for Orange County Sanitation District purposes. CEQA FINDINGS The project is covered in the previously approved 1989 Master Plan/EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989 and the Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Page 2 \ 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Proposal Letter and Fee DAL:LR:jo G:\ntglobaMganda Dreg Reports\PD06-13 AR 030603.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Anandonmenl of Alrba.Trunk,WnlPnn end California Sowar6 COWRACT NO,613 OIfldN4. rna'. a a feNM 1N9. N ve eaRNal19 ape!@NgBN aunilo� -..rcr o.or. EDo Aro e� PCOJLIrT� .NORVW[ R4�aN ''OnamT -euoaar mrnr uoen ..a.. TovarsP Tram GwWnMa ma b £ r wu .oVrT. aa f . f % o f RNmrurwCW an i O tl f Professional Services Agreement Status Report Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer Watson and California Sewers Contract No 6-13 Total Project Budget: $384,000 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Start Date of Project: May 1, 1994 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Original Design of new collector sewers in Watson Ave. & $57,585 3/9/1994 PSA California St. so sections of the Airbase Trunk Sewer can be abandoned. $57,585 Revising and updating previously prepared $112,237 2/28/2001 1 contract documents to meet local agency standards and adding work on Arlington Drive $54 652 12/04/2001 2 Modify and updating of specifications to current $131,787 standards $19,550 Pending 3 Additional engineering services for contract $142,677 document modifications and construction support. $10,890 EDMS ID No 003745261 03/13/03 RBWwd MUM i PDC COMMITTEE roa(e roee.orar. 3IW03 X6103 AGENDA REPORT Vern Number Rem Number PD02-14 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Julian F. Sabri, Project Management Office SUBJECT: Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement for Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pimie for Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79, providing for additional engineering services for an amount of$192,829, increasing the total amount not to exceed $446,064. SUMMARY • Emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPS) from District's Central Generation System (CGS) engines do not meet future South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) standards. • Malcolm Pimie's current scope of work includes performing all investigations, evaluations, and analyses required to make a recommendation for emission control on the Central Generation System engines. This work excludes any field testing. A report will be prepared documenting all the work performed and the basis for recommendations. For each facility option identified, the Consultant will evaluate the following: 1. Regulatory Requirements and Compliance 2. SCAQMD permit requirements and costs 3. Operations and maintenance impacts 4. Economic Evaluation 5. Location of new emission control 6. Tie-ins to electric, gas, water, and other utilities 7. Staffing levels 8. Automation levels and requirements 9. Continuous Emissions Monitoring • The Consultant will recommend the two most promising alternatives, and based on that recommendation will create a master plan for the implementation of the emission control system. C DCCum0m5 yp 5eq,pTpppeLLMy$BM, MTer as I Memel FIe$'OMFEV,em I NO W mRme.E R_. Vaw Page 1 • The SCAOMD compliance date to meet reduced NOx emissions is December 2004. e The compliance date for reduced HAPS emissions has not been set, but will likely be sometime in 2006. • The original intent of the current PSA with Malcolm Pirnie was to complete the aforementioned master plan by June 2003, with any additional tasks to follow under a separate PSA. However, due to the SCAQMD compliance deadline of December 2004, Staff recommends proceeding immediately with NOx pilot testing as part of this PSA with the following justifications: o This pilot testing will be needed in order to provide the acceptable solution for the Central Generation System, and to comply with SCAQMD requirements. o The NOx testing will determine the cost, scope, and timing of implementing the proper solution. o This NOx pilot testing is a natural progression of the work that Malcolm Pirnie is performing as part of their original study tasks. The cost of the pilot testing could not have been determined until the subject matter experts began their investigation. • The requested increase reflects costs for NOx pilot testing only, as described under "Additional Information". Pilot testing of one or more technologies to control HAPS will also be required in order to confine their effectiveness in reducing emissions in this application. Staff will return to the Board for approval once these candidate HAPS technologies and costs have been defined. • Present construction cost is $1,500,000. This cost may have to be revised depending on this project's findings. It is too early to determine the likelihood of a cost increase/decrease or the potential magnitude. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The authorization is within the project's budget for 2002/03. The total budget of $2,964,000 will not change. The requested action will increase the Consultant PSA authorization from $253,235 to $446,064 as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. The $192,829 increase to the Consultant PSA will come from project Contingency funds. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 97) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No change to the project budget is requested. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. C:1 umema and Sen1n9aV-P-%—Sadng Temporary Imemel Fles\OL6F.I.nn 131e1.Malcdm Pimatloc R--d &1.g Page 2 Y ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The proposed Addendum No. 1 includes the following tasks for a pilot test of NOx reduction technologies: 1. The Consultant will develop a test protocol and then design and provide test hardware for confirming the performance of the proposed emission reduction technology on a Plant No. 1 or Plant No. 2 engine. 2. The Consultant will oversee installation of the candidate technology on an engine at each facility. Installation of the technology will be completed by a separate contractor or District forces. The Consultant will then manage testing of the engine over the range of operation to confirm the effectiveness of the technology. The Consultant will modify the technology as required to meet the test objectives. A source testing firm will be retained to conduct emissions testing to verify that the new NOx emission standards can be met under the full range of engine operating conditions, and is included in Addendum No. 1. 3. The Consultant will reduce and evaluate the data. If the results are positive, the Consultant will refine the technology and recommend a final design approach for production hardware to be permanently installed on all engines. ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with the field test. Without pilot testing it is not possible to verity effectiveness and cost of the candidate emissions reduction technology. If final hardware is installed and it does not result in the expected reductions, modification of the hardware will incur substantial costs, potentially delaying compliance with SCAQMD requirements by up to a year. CEQA FINDINGS The project prepares paper and electronic data and is categorically exempt from CEQA. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Malcolm Pirnie Letter Dated February 19, 2003 JB:jo GAMglobafWgenda Draft Reports%P=J-79 Add-1 AR 020603,doc CMom Mara lm mFlenWLM "Wm 13(0.We Pim Oe. a.,;w: a'M Page 3 N BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE CBn lGm Nw*n Al om llon JOB NO.J-79 [NWXK tl1ggFM NIR 4gOPoSm FextlllF➢ Rrt <V:ryOA® 8YM[( GYMOq¢RtlX ®vxxxgNl¢ 6Tp[n'p!u BVLDET M Mq[0.9[ V]GET TOOL® 1¢glC9x 1VfNpgtlAlwX OO�M1y � uen GSX MOIICTTmN x i s { f x :m8xx i Yv > MMbw { 3 f Snii W9i tlf IxOTFB: ('IBeof0o0o0>+:XW soxCnw cere:a0m 6yw1omWwewanBaeperel0wnnwl Professional Services Agreement Status Report Central Generation Automation Job No. J-79 Total Project Budget: $2,964,000 Consultant: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Start Date of Project: 1/7/2003 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 11/7/2002 OPSnnal Emission Reduction Study $ 253,235 $ 253,235 Pending Addendum Provide NOx Pilot Testing $ 192,829 $446,064 No. 1 C.Tmuments and SettlngstpopeUcal SetlingsVempotary Internet Files\OLKVatem 13(e).21.doc 03/18/03 Revised M14/98 Y MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 12,2003, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Brian Brady, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer Roy Moore, Vice Chair Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Alberta Christy Greg Mathews,Administrative Services Manager Mike Duvall Carol Beekman, Communications Services Mark Leyes Manager Joy Neugebauer Mike While, Controller Juanita Skillman Directors Absent: John Swindler Sam Mowbray James W. Silva Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Steve Anderson, Vice Board Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Nixon, General Counsel Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel Don Hughes Toby Weissert Randy Fuhrman Ryal Wheeler (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman requested he be allowed to speak prior to the consideration of Item 11(a). (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair had no report. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 March 12, 2003 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported the special meeting on asset management for the OMTS Committee to be held on March 19 had been postponed. Directors would be advised when it was rescheduled. Mr. Anderson updated the Directors on legislative issues at the federal and state levels. Special districts have not been impacted to date on the state budget cuts, but staff is closely monitoring the situation. Two bills are being sponsored at the state level regarding an amendment to Proposition 218 and urban runoff fees, as well as management of biosolids. Several directors have also recently met with legislators in Washington, DC: Shirley McCracken,Alberta Christy, and Jim Silva. It is important that the District obtain an EPA grant of$3 millionlyear for the next ten years to help defray costs of additional secondary treatment facilities. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCEITREASURER Gary Streed, Director of Financelrreasurer, referred the Directors to the Treasurer's Report distributed to the Directors, and noted that the report included additional information. Additional handouts were provided relating to the user fee schedule and the reserves policy, which would be covered in more detail when those items were considered that evening. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. (8) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES MANAGER Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager, reported that the first three weeks of the advertising program for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) project were being evaluated. The first segment included television ads and over 700,000 mailers to service area residents. There were only 18 inquiries,of which only three were negative. All of the phone calls were returned by staff at OCWD. The primary objective of the first phase was to inform, not to elicit a response,so the results are right on track. The GWRS website showed a significant increase in visitors,from approximately 300 prior to the ad campaign launch to nearly 1,200 visitors in two weeks. The feedback from community outreach ads in Viet News and Excelsior indicates that minority communities were not aware of the water shortage in Orange County. Some Directors were concerned that the television commercial left the wrong impression on water conservation by showing a man carelessly using water to squirt several children. The message was tested by focus groups prior to showing it on TV. Blake Anderson reaffirmed that intended messages often vary with messages received. Interviews are underway for the Communications Ascertainment RFP. The Ascertainment will evaluate public perceptions about OCSD and then use those findings to help prepare a strategic communications plan. -Y Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 March 12, 2003 (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The Chair ordered that the February 19, 2003 minutes for the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved, as mailed. b. FAHR03-11 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of February 2003. C. FAHR03-12 Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP)Monthly Report. d. FAHR03-13 Receive and file Employment Status Report as of February 27, 2003. e. FAHR03-14 Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. f. FAHR03-15 Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing policies- 9. FAHR03-16 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03- ,Adopting Policies and Procedures for District's Records Management Program, Records Retention, and Destruction of Obsolete Records, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 02-02. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (g) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR03-17 Direct staff to revise the 1996 Reserves Policy and to provide the Board with cash flows and sewer user fee projections that incorporate those revisions and the Committee's preference for a sewer user fee increase program. Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer, reviewed in depth the District's current Reserves Policy and various changes that are needed, as well as impacts if the current user rate schedule is raised at a more rapid rate. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting (� Page 4 March 12, 2003 Randy Fuhrman encouraged Directors to carefully consider escalating the rates more rapidly so that less money would need to be borrowed,and the long-tens overall rate would be much less. Directors entered into lengthy discussions of basic philosophies regarding borrowing and reducing the District's present reserves. Directors requested additional comparisons at various rates be presented the following month. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly canted to refer the item back to staff for additional comparisons at various rates. b. FAHR03-18 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1)Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract for an additional $500,000, increasing the total authorized amount from $1,000.000 to an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for the remainder of FY 02/03; and, (2)Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract from$1,000,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,750,000 for FY 03/04. Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, briefly reviewed the District's need for temporary services vs. limited term contract employees. When the program was initially approved, the disinfection of District's effluent was not known, and regulation changes to industrial waste permits were unknown. Directors requested a comparison of the cost for hiring limited- term employees vs. temporary agencies be included in the future. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly canted to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR03-19 Review Director Christy's questions regarding Quarterly Financial Report process from the February Board meeting. Gary Streed, Director of Financefrreasurer, reviewed the financial reports produced on a quarterly basis by PIMCO and Callan &Associates. The detail not covered in PIMCO's quarterly report is included in the monthly Treasurer's Report that the FAHR Committee and the Board of Directors receive monthly. Both Gary Streed and Mike White, Controller, read and closely monitor the monthly reports. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting B Page 5 March 12, 2003 (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 7:23 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item No. 13(a)(1). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There was no reportable action taken by the Committee re Agenda Item No. 13(a)(1). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 7:50 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for April 9, 2003 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Submitted by: &�4KZ- r Penny M.Ryie FAHR Committee zwcretary G:\wy.dta\aganda\FAHR\FAHR20030203\021903 FAHR Mlnutea.doc • . � � . � � � � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ����������������u�� ppoimiouiuu ® niiiiiiuuuuui — ■ > > »' Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund February 28, 2003 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance February 1,2003 $21,084,844 $21,084,944 $21,084,844 1.945 1.945 Withdrawals: 2/5/2003 (2,100,000) (2,100,000) (2,100,000) 1.945 1.945 2/13/2003 (7,700.000) (7,700,000) (7,700,000) 1.945 1.945 2/1912003 (1,400,000) (1,400,000) (1,400,000) 1.945 1.945 2128/2003 (900,000) (900,000) (900,000) 1.945 1.945 Total Withdrawls (12,100,000) (12,100,000) (12,100,000) 1.945 1.945 Balance February 28,2003 $8,984,844 $8,984,844 $8,984,844 1.946 1.946 P I M C O 840 Newport Center Drive Suite 300 Newport Beech,CA 92660 Tel: 949.720.6000 March 10,2003 FM:949.720.1376 Mr. Mike White,CPA Controller Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Dear Mike: The following is a description of events in the bond markets during the month of February in addition to an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term and Liquid portfolios over the period. Also included is a section on our outlook and preferred strategies to be pursued in your portfolios during the coming months. Bond Marker Recap: The pending U.S. war with Iraq dominated financial market behavior in February, as investors sought the safety of U.S. Treasuries and other high-quality assets. As a result, the S&P 500 index declined 1.50%, while the Lehman Treasury index returned 1.72%. U.S. Treasury yields declined across the curve with 2-year yields falling 0.18%, 10-year yields dropping 0.27%, and 30-year yields declining 0.17%. Mortgages outperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis, with Ginnie Mites lagging both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issues. Corporate bonds also outperformed Treasuries, with the Lehman Credit index beating Treasuries by 0.23% on a curve- adjusted basis, posting an absolute return of 2.00%. Lower quality investment grade corporates outperformed as BBB-rated bonds posted an absolute monthly return of 2.28% compared to 1.51% for AAA-rated issues. The Lehman High Yield index trailed Treasuries, yet still returned 1.23%, marking a decoupling of performance between the high yield and equity markets. Although still trailing U.S. Treasuries, Europe performed very well as yields fell across the maturity spectrum. Emerging market bonds continued to post strong performance, lead by Brazil, which had a 7.5%monthly return. The J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global gained 3.20% for the month. Geopolitical uncertainty is having a real impact on the U.S. economy in the fort of a 19% surge in oil prices since the start of the year, which appears to have undermined consumer confidence and dampened the manufacturing recovery. The University of Michigan Consumer Confidence survey fell to 79.9 from 82.4 because of pessimism about the economy's current and future prospects. This represented the lowest level since September 1993. In concert with the fall in confidence, personal spending declined slightly in January, the first decrease in four months. Incomes rose modestly for a sixth straight month, indicating that consumers are saving more of their earnings. Manufacturing was also constrained as the Institute for Supply Management's factory index fell to 50.5 from 53.9 in January, while durable goods spending dropped 5.7%, the biggest decline since the 1990-91 recession. Mr. Mike White, CPA March 10, 2003 Orange County Sanitation District Page 2 The domestic bond market returned 1.38% in February, as measured by the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Index (LBAG). In absolute terms, the credit sector was the best performing sector, posting a positive return of 2.00%. The Treasury and mortgage sectors lagged, posting returns of 1.72% and 0.67%, respectively. On a duration-adjusted basis, mortgages performed best, followed by corporates and then by Treasuries. Treasury yield changes during the month of February are summarized as follows: • 3-month bills: +2 basis points to 1.19% • 6-month bills: unchanged at 1.18% • 2-year notes: -18 basis point to 1.51% • 5-year notes: -27 basis points to 2.66% • 10-year notes: -27 basis points to 3.69% • 30-year notes: -17 basis points to 4.67% Performance Attribution: Long-Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 1.04 percent for the month of February, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 16 basis points. The following points summarize returns for the period ended February 28: • The Long-Tern portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 16 basis points for the month and by 19 basis points for the year-to-date period. • Portfolio duration and yield curve positioning were largely neutral for performance. • Mortgage-backed securities performed strongly on a duration-adjusted basis,generating higher returns than similar-duration Treasuries. • An underweight exposure to corporates detracted from performance, as the corporate sector continued to rally during the month. Liquid Portfoli0 The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.09 percent during the month of February, performing in line with the 3-month Treasury Bill Index. The following points summarize returns for the period ending February 28: • The Liquid portfolio generated performance equal to that of the benchmark for the month and the year-to-date period. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. Mr Mike White, CPA March 10, 2003 v Orange County Sanitation District Page 3 Outlook and Strateev: We currently believe the global economy, and hence the bond market, are in a transition phase. Aggressive stimulus policies, mainly by U.S. monetary and fiscal authorities, will reduce the risk of deflation in the near term and sustain moderate growth of about 3% in the U.S. over the next year, with mild inflation and U.S. interest rates near current levels. Bonds should offer relatively attractive yields with less volatility than most asset classes. Key elements of our cyclical forecast include the following: • The explicit commitment to fight deflation with a variety of tools issued by senior Federal Reserve officials in the fourth quarter is a critical new development that will bolster confidence and boost risk appetites in financial markets and corporate boardrooms. • U.S. fiscal policy is poised to become more reflationary. Defense spending is on the rise and the White House is expected to roll out another stimulus package in 2003. Fiscal stimulus could boost the federal deficit to 4"/u of GDP from the current 2% over the next year. • The U.S. corporate sector will be less of a drag on growth. Reductions in capital spending, inventories and employees over the past two years will slow because companies have made considerable progress toward balance sheet repair. • Policymakers in Europe and Japan have less reflationary, enthusiasm than their American counterparts. Global growth will be limited as much by this policy imbalance as by the level and distribution of aggregate demand. With the global economy in transition, we plan to add value while protecting portfolios against both deflation and reflation risks. Portfolio duration will be kept relatively close to the benchmark. Yield curve exposure will focus on both short and long maturities since the middle of the curve would bear the brunt of rate increases. At the same time, longer maturities would outperform and help returns in a deflationary environment. Sector strategies are expected to combine yield enhancement with strong credit quality. Mortgages remain an attractive investment as they offer a substantial yield cushion against price erosion with minimal credit exposure. We plan to continue to underweight corporates overall because the risk/reward tradeoff is unappealing for many issues. However, we plan to add value via selection of corporates with attractive yield premiums and solid fundamentals. We look forward to discussing these and other topics with you in the near future. Best regards, Christine Telish,CFA John M. Miller, CFA Vice President Senior Vice President Orange County Sanitation District ' for the month ending February 28, 2003 Total Return Account- 203 With Accrued Interest Without Accrued Interest Market Value 324,830,585 321,855,261 Book Value 311.871,551 308,896,227 Yield to Maturity 2.43 2.45 Short Term Account-603 With Accrued Interest Without Accrued Interest Market Value 64,469,174 64,018,807 Book Value 64,626,098 64,175,732 Yield to Maturity 1.61 1.62 e. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2003) Page I of I Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $64,469,174 • Mellon $64,449,169 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $64,626,098 • Mellon $64,600,177 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.31 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)oft%Change: $199854 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 50% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Remm(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.09 0.09 3 Months: 0.34 0.32 12 Months: 2.01 1.61 Year-to-Date: 0.20 0.20 Commentary InMnttntes at the shostend ofthe yield curve Increased slightly dudngthe month(3monlh T-Bills ton 2 basis pointy to 1.190A),while longer maturities decreased(30q uTreasurics fell It basis poinB to 4.67%). The Uquidponfollo gcrotatedperfmmance equal to thatofthe benchmark duringthe month and ycari -date. PB4CO's emphasis on higher yleldingsecuritiessuch as commercial paper and thort4erm notes contributed to performance. G:\wp4,MVV..1uYs—,M,.&[Qmea s1rT.dx MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2003) Page I of 3 Long-Term Operating Monles(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $324,830,585 • Mellon $324,752,851 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $311,871,551 • Mellon $312,123,926 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.25 Of Index: 2.33 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact ainAoss of 1°%Change: $7 308.688 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 15% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality; AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No* 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE N Retum(%)by Portfolio Index 104 0.88 2692.47 8007.94 ate: 1.12 0.93 Threemonlh yields increased slightly during the month(90day T-Bills me 2 basis points to 1.19%)white longer maturities decreased(5-year Treasury Notes fell 27 hour points to 2.66%). • The Long-Term portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 16 basis points for the month and by 19 basis points for the year-to-date period. • Portfolio duration end yield curve positioning were largely mutrd for performance. • Motgagc-0acked securities pMomed strongly on a duroionedjusted tots,generating higher W.Nos similar-diamo t Treasures. M underweight allocation to corporates detracted from performance as the corporate sector continuedto rally duringthe month. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DVVFSTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2003) Page 2 of 3 -Compliance Issues: $1,600,000 par of United Airlines(UAL)Pass-Through 2001-1-C(909317BC2),6.83M coupon,9/12008 maturity,representing 0.5%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis-was purchased an 81102001;and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAI (on 9/18)2001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 9202001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BA I to BA3(on 12212001)and by S&P from BBB to BB(on 628102). Following news of the possible bankruptcy filing,the security was further downgraded in August(B3 Moody's,B+by S&P). On November 29,2002,S&P further downgraded this issue to B,and shortly thereafter on December 9,2002,downgraded the issue one notch further to&. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A.by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. On December 4,2002,the Federal Air Transportation Stabilization Board(ATSB)rejected UAL$1.5 billion loan guarantee application,citing fundamental flaws with its proposed business plan. In response to the ATSB rejection,the airline submitted its much-anticipated filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on December 0. UAL's filing is the largest bankruptcy ever in the global airline industry,resulting from high costs and low airfares that have plagued the industry since"9/I1". The ATSB stated that UAL could submit a revised loan guarantee application in the fume or seek a loan guarantee as part of a Chapter I 1 reorganization. UAL simultaneously renewed its campaign to cut its costs,by announcing it will reduce pay for all officers by about I I%and trim wages for salaried and management employees by 2.8%to 10.7%. UAL will also begin fresh talks with unions about how they will contribute to the cost cutting. UAL said it now has approximately$800 million in unrestricted cash on hand and$600 million in restricted cash. To help the airline meet its bills,the bankmptcyjudge approved an initial$800 million in interim financing,part of the$1.5 billion in debtor-in-possession(DIP)financing the carrier arranged with lenders to see it througb the bankruptcy. An additional$700 million of the DIP financing will be available to UAL in the event that it satisfies certain conditions,which include that UAL obtain positive cumulative earnings before interest,taxes,depreciation,amortization,and rents(EBITDAR))from December 1,2002. Given UAL's cash bum rate and modest cash on hand,the company must take decisive actions to quickly limit its cash bum before the DIP Ponds have been dissipated. Compared to its competitors,UAL's labor force is extremely unproductive and the bulk of the airline's restructuring efforts should be focused on improving the productivity of its labor force. As part of its capacity reduction plans,UAL will reject,or abandon,aircraft that it does not intend to use in the future. These reductions will be focused on certain older aircraft models,potentially including B727-200a,8767-200s,B747-400s,and B737-300s. In addition to rejecting aircraft that it does not intend to utilize in the future,UAL may also reject aircraft that it would like to utilize. UAL would be incentivimd to reject such aircraft if it believes that it will be able to successfully renegotiate the terns of loans and leases on these aircraft. On March 4,UAL announced that it lost$382 million for the month of January following the$1.5 billion fourth quarter loss. The company had$1.17 billion in operating revenues and$1.51 billion in operating expenses before additional expenses were included. The airline recorded$276 million in labor costs and paid S222 million for fuel. UAL is trying to cement long-term contract changes before a March 17 deadline when it may formally ask that all labor agreements be scrapped. PIMCO continues to recommend holding the UAL securities,as they expect that negotiations with the company will yield better values than what can currently be achieved in the secondary market. Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB in the event of a split Ming. •$7,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities(cusip 345397GV 9,345397S13,and 345397SR5),maturing at various dates in 2003,2004,and 2005,represents 2.2%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;and now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a father downgrade from A2 on 1/162002 and an S&P rating of BBB after a further downgrade from BBB+on 10252002. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2003) Page 3 of 3 •$7,950,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(cusip 370425QV5 and 37042WE80),maturing various dates in 2003,represents 2.5%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+,and a further downgrade to BBB occurring on 10/16/2002;but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A2. •$3,500,000 par of Virginia Electric Power NT securities(cusip 927804EN0),maturing in 2006,represents 1.1%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The security was downgraded on 102 M002 by S&P from A-to BBB+,but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A3. G,WAdmlfla12201whIre%TMemry Ngmnl-71080IM342.RPT.doc Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.' / BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 28-FEB-2003 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 7,646,167.83 7,646,167.83 11.86% 0.00 U.S.GOVERNMENTS-LESS THN IYR 99,921.88 99,921.88 0.16% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 13,276,215.73 13,276,215.73 20.60% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 9,019,790.88 9,019,780.88 14.00% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN I YR 7,920,447.72 7,820,447.72 12.13% 0.00 OTHER U.S.GOVT OBLIGATIONS 945,519.61 845,518.61 1.31% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,207,869.85 1,207,969.85 1.87% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 39,915,922.50 39,915,922.50 61.93% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 39,915,922.50 39,915,922.50 61.93% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 6,251,984.38 6,231,375.00 9.67% -20,609.38 U.S.AGENCIES 9,005,989.45 8,967,055.22 13.91% -38,934.23 BANKING&FINANCE 6,050,460.61 5,974,337.01 9.27% -76,123.60 INDUSTRIAL 2,274,268.81 2,261,904.72 3.51% -12,364.09 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 677,046.50 674,069.50 1.05% .2,977.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 24,259,749.75 24,108,741.45 37.41% -151,008.30 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 24,259,749.75 24,108,741.45 37.41% -151,00830 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 424,504.84 424,504.84 0.669/6 0.00 TOTAL 424,504.84 424,504.84 0.6694. 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 424,504.84 424,504.84 0.66% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 64,600,177.09 64,449,169.79 100.00% -151,00830 10-Mar-2003 16..09.44 Erecuaw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. I BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSFV7522202 28-FEB-2003 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 47,433.89 47,433.89 0.01% 0.00 PAYABLES -39,610,000.00 -39,610,000.00 -12.20% 0.00 TOTAL -39,564566.11 -39,562,566.11 -12.18% 0.00 UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 3,187,904.00 3,187,904.00 0.98% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 12,944,923.33 12,957,113.00 3.99% 12,189.67 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 11,940,202.75 11,940,202.75 3.68% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 17,844,576.25 17,845,%2.88 5.50% 1,386.63 MUTUAL FUNDS 315,584.75 315,584.75 0.10% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 46,233,191.08 46,246,767.38 14.24% 13,576.30 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 6,670,624.97 6,684,201.27 2.06% 13,5M530 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 122,227,770.90 123,441,834.76 38.01% 1,214,063.86 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,379,452.81 36,325,48017 11.19% 6,946,029.06 U.S.AGENCIES 43,236,026.16 46,374,691.01 14.28% 3,138,664.85 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 17,674,317.88 18,251,957.06 5.62% 577,639.18 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 6,029,920.43 6,210,876.99 1.91% 180,956.56 FHLMC POOLS 322,968.23 332,689.06 0,10% 9,720.83 FHLMC MULTICLASS 3,009,504.53 3,079,577.92 0.95% 70,073.39 FNMA POOLS 29,110,000.00 29,269,062.60 9.01% 159,062.60 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 2,891,490.45 3,174,690.43 0.98% 283,199.98 ADS:CAR LOAN 170,518.72 167,356.17 0.05% -3,162.55 ABS:AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.00 368,000.00 0.11% .1,232,000.00 BANKING&FINANCE 27,924,086.50 29,492,583.00 3.77% 558,496.50 INDUSTRIAL 7,255,28000 7,393,560.00 2.28% 138,280.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 8,589,460.00 9,113,655.00 2,81% 524,195.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 3,063,750.00 3,113,880.00 0.96% 50,130.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 302,484,546.61 315,099,894.37 97.03% 12,615,348.26 J&Mo 2003 16.10.33 Execulm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 28-FEB-2003 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3M,406S46.61 315,099,894.87 97.03% 12,615,348.26 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 2,968,754.72 2,968,754.72 0.91% 0.00 TOTAL 2,968,754.72 2,968,754.72 0.91% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 2,968,754.72 2,968,754.72 0.91% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 312,123,926.30 324,752,850.86 100.00% 12,628,924.56 10-Mm 2003 16:10:33 Esaaunw ipbrkk xh YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 1 OCSF07511102 2003/02/28 RUN DATE i 03/07/03 DISTRICTi LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME i 11.35.41 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY TO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 1,500,000.OD SECTOR DICKINSON DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.675 1,495,131.67 3.34 0l5BESRGO 04/16/2003 1,495,131.67 2.34 1,564,000.00 DO PONT OR NOMURA DISC .DOD .000 P-1 99.056 1,561,755.66 3.91 26354BR97 04/09/2003 1,561,755.66 2.44 381,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CA BR CONS SYSTEM .000 .000 P-1 99.674 319,I56.99 .95 313312DRO NAT 03/21/2003 A-1♦ 379,759.99 .59 500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CA BK CONS SYSTEM .000 .000 P-/ 90.509 497,544.44 1.24 313312MS MAY 05/05/2003 A-1. 497,544.44 .78 750,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CA BK CONS SYSTEM .000 .000 P-1 99.404 745,531.25 1.96 313312GKO MAT 06/03/2003 A-1+ 745,531.25 1.16 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL MORE LH UK CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.303 997,073.61 2.49 313384FN4 MAT 05/21/2003 A-1. 997,073.61 1.56 500,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BR CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.450 497,249.33 1.24 313384MO MAT 06/10/2003 A-la 497,249.33 .90 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN UK CONS DISC N .000 ,ODO P-1 99.399 1,987,986.11 4.98 313384HV4 MAT 07/O7/2003 A-la 1,987,986.11 3.11 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL ROVE LN BR CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.364 2,484,099.65 6.22 313304EX0 MAT 07/09/2003 A-I+ 2,494,099.65 3.80 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN NTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.906 4,491,295.00 11.25 313396CQ4 MAY 03/04/2003 A-I+ 4,491,285.00 1.01 500,000.0 FEDERAL E010S LN NTG CORD DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.682 499,411.25 1.24 313396FQa HAT 05/15/2003 A-I♦ 498,411.25 .98 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MTG CORD DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.612 1,195,345.00 2.99 313396GF4 NAT 05/30/2003 A-1a 1,195,345.00 1.87 500,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MIG CORE DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.446 497,230.69 1.24 313396BB2 MAT 06/19/2003 A-l+ 497,230.69 .70 500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.898 499,487.50 1.25 313588CR4 RAT 03/05/2003 A-1+ 499,487.50 .78 MDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2 OCSF03511102 2003/02/20 RUN DAM 03/07/03 DISTRICT. LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 11.35.41 aeveveveenveweevevuvevuvvevvuvsvveevu.uuuveuucunununce=av=ccxccccvnncunccnzuneeceucvcnnuaucccccnnc.......................... PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MAMET TOTAL COST/ 4 Type SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL --------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 505,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.360 503,787.50 1.26 313588CTO NAT 03/07/2002 A-14 503,307.50 .39 400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTH ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.913 399,652.38 1.00 313SBBCXI MT 03/11/2003 A-I+ 399,652.70 .62 YOD,ODO.DO FEDERAL NAIL RID ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.388 690,517.36 1.04 313588EE3 HAT 04/16/2003 A-I+ 690,517.36 1.09 2,700,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HTG ASSN DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.718 1,695,200.33 4.24 31350SES0 0.0001 04/23/2003 DD 04/28/02 A-I+ 1,695,200.33 2.65 500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTO ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.434 497,371.81 1.24 313588GT6 MAT 06/11/2003 A-l+ 491,371.91 .70 800,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.395 395,I56.00 1.99 313588HOl MT 07/02/2003 A-I+ 795,156.00 1.24 100,OOD.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.625 99,625.50 .24 36959JT89 06/11/2003 99,625.50 .16 1,500,000.00 GOLDWAN SACHS LP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.489 1,492,335.00 3.73 38142UU35 07/07/2003 1,492,335.00 2.33 1,500,000.00 PITNEY SORES INC DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.904 1,490,257.50 3.35 72447TQ33 03/03/2003 1,490,257.50 2.34 100,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN SW .000 1.229 P-1 99.922 99,921.99 .25 06307TRUS VM RT 03/20/2003 DD 09/19/02 A-la 99,921.88 .16 850,000.00 STUDENT IN MARRYING ASSN DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.433 145,510.61 2.11 863872FOS MAT 05/15/2003 A-I+ 845,518.61 1.32 1,500,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC .000 .000 M 99.938 1,499,062.50 3.95 9766SSQAI 03/10/2003 1,499,062.50 2.34 1,207,869.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH RGMT .000 2.107 AAA 100.000 1,207,069.05 3.02 996005247 AAA 1,207,969.85 1.89 1,865,000.00 FEDERAL SORE LN BE DISCOUNT NT 1.296 .000 P-1 99.412 1,054,040.02 4.64 313384GFO MAT 05/30/2003 A-I+ 1,054,040.02 2.90 550,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RED ASSN DISCOUNT I.306 .000 P-1 99.534 547,656.39 1.37 313599DF9 MAT 03/19/2003 A-14 547,656.39 .96 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 MSF07511102 2003/02/28 RUN DAYS 03/07/03 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME , 11.35.41 ennvevvvwvaevvv=======v==n==e=====unncuvcuccun====v=u==c=====u=====________=...............____=====n====e====w==.......- PAN VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 8-P PRICE MARRY VALUE 1 TOTAL _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LN MTH CORE DISC 1.30E .000 P-1 99.422 4,971,111.11 12.45 313396FE6 MAT 05/22/2003 A-1F 41971,111.11 7.76 3,402,000.00 FEDERAL NATL NTH ASSN DISC 1.438 .000 P-1 99.440 3,302,951.13 8.47 313588F05 05/07/2003 A-1+ 3,362,951.13 5.28 ________ _______ ----------------- _______-- TOTAL CASE 6 CABS EQUIVALENTS .052 .013 39,915,922.50 100.00 39,915,922.50 62.37 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH SR NY .000 1.599 RA1 200.046 1,502.520.00 6.22 046003KRI FLTG RT D5/08/2003 DO 05/08/00 AA- 1,500,690.00 2.34 650,000.00 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC .000 5.665 AA3 103.703 677,046.50 2.79 077859AA6 5.9751 02/01/2004 DD 02/01/94 A3 674,059.50 1.05 200,000.00 COLLATE PALMOLIVE NTH TR 00058 .000 5.124 AA3 102.843 206,476.00 .85 19416OCR4 5.2701 12/01/2003 DO 11/24/98 AA- 205,686.00 .32 100,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BR8 CORE BUS .000 3.005 AAA 101.312 102,479.60 .75 3133M MS 3.1251 11/14/2003 DO 12/03/01 ARA 182,361.15 .20 1,35D,000.00 FEDERAL PARS CR BR8 CORE SYSTE .000 5.208 AAA 103.689 1,399,963.50 5.00 3133IS607 6.4D1 01/23/2004 DD 01/01/1999 AAA 1,399,807.3E 2.19 550,000.00 FEDERAL FANS CR BR8 CURB HIS .000 4.091 AAA 102.223 565,229.50 2.33 3133IRC78 5.000E 10/02/2003 DD 10/02/98 AAA S12,225.40 .00 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL HAIL SIG ASSN DESK .000 4.945 AAA 103.631 3,321,006.00 13.75 31359MEMI 5.125E 02/13/2004 OD 02/00/99 ARA 3,316,193.28 5.10 533,000.OD GENERAL ELEC NTH 4TR 00454 .000 7.387 AAA 101.531 544,976.51 2.24 36962GUXD 7.500% 06/05/2003 DD 06/05/00 A-2 541,160.23 .05 250,000.00 GILLETTE CO NY .000 6.116 AA3 102.107 256,012.50 1.05 375766ACG 6.2501 00/15/2003 DD 09/16/93 AA- 255,467.50 .40 300,000.00 GOLDHAN SACHS GRP NTH 4TRDDI00 .000 1.589 AS 100.093 300,227.10 1.24 301410ED7 VAR RT 08/18/2003 DD 00/16/00 A. 300,279.00 .47 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE , 4 OCSF07511302 2003/02/28 RUN DATE , 03/01/03 DISTRICT3 LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME , 11.35.41 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MERIT VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 700,000.00 LILLY ELI 6 CO NT .000 6.241 M3 100.140 706,771.00 2.90 532457AJ1 6.25UB 03/15/2003 DO 03/15/93 AA 100,980.00 1.09 500,000.00 PAINE WEEDER MOW INC RED .000 6.212 AA 103.82B 519,405.00 2.15 69S629CE3 6.4501 12/01/20D3 DD 12/01/98 M4 519,140.00 .91 656,000.00 PROCTER 6 BREDLE CO HIS .000 5.144 M3 102.062 672,279.56 2.71 742318BK4 5.2501 09/15/2003 DD 09/20/90 M- 669,526.72 1.05 5,800,000.00 U B TREASURY BONDS .000 11.053 AAA 207.430 6,251,984.30 25.B4 912810DGG 11.875% 11/15/2003 DD 1D/05/83 AAA 6,231,31S.00 9.73 425,000.00 WAL MART STORES INC .000 6.421 M2 101.234 432,730.75 1.78 931142AQ6 6.500% 06/01/2003 M 430,244.50 .67 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN RTG CORP DESS 1.454 4.456 AAA 100.982 1,019,200.00 4.18 3134A4FF6 4.500E 06/15/2003 DO 06/15/01 AM 1,009,020.40 1.58 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LN ER CONS BUB 1.S11 4.440 AAA 101.190 2,039,990.00 8.39 3133MGSJI 4.5001 07/07/2003 DD 07/06/01 AAA 2,023,605.60 3.16 100,000.00 FED ROWS LN KID COAT DEB 1.535 6.195 AAA 200.409 101,807.00 .41 313400THS 6.220E 03/24/2003 DD 03/24/93 MA 100,408.72 .16 450,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO SURGE 1.615 5.940 AA 103.109 467,496.00 1.92 949140BY9 6.125% 11/01/2003 DD 11/01/93 A 463,990.50 .72 150,000.DO FEDERAL TARN CR DES CONS MIN 1.664 6.385 AAA 102.592 155,796.00 .63 31331NN59 6.S508 00/19/2003 DD 06/19/96 AAA IS3,887.52 .24 200,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN BE CONS BOB 1.664 5.799 AM 102.175 103,311.00 .42 3133M55B2 5.925% 08/14/2003 DO 08/14/90 AM 102,175.09 .16 1,000,000.00 RORGAN STANLEY BE NEW 0=00349 1.357 6.949 AA 102.531 1,045,350.00 4.2S 617452094 7.1254 09/15/2003 OD OB/10/00 M- 1,025,310.00 1.60 100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTO ASSN NTN 1.917 6.624 AAA 101.290 102,765.00 •42 31364CDD7 6.310E 05/21/2003 DO OS/21/96 AM 101,297.87 .16 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO NEW NT 1.949 7.135 MI 100.906 560,601.00 2.26 949740CHS 7.2001 05/01/2003 DO 04/26/00 A4 S44,692.40 .85 400,000.00 DORMER ER BA1108BARE8 INC SUB 2.260 6.339 M3 100.I56 411,460.00 1.66 096650MG 6.250E 03/15/2003 DD 03/15/93 A 400,624.00 .63 YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 5 OCSF07511102 2003/02/28 ROE DATE 03/07/03 DISTRICT. LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 11.35.41 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT ROOOY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD B-P PRICE RAREST VALUE \ TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 324,000.00 BANKAMRICA CORP SIIB NT 2.372 6.706 US 101.312 336,317.00 1.36 066050897 6.875% 06/01/2003 DO 06/01/93 A 329,250.00 .51 15,000.00 PBDBRAL ROBE LN SEE CONS BD 1.751 5.893 AA\ 101.810 15,470.85 .06 3133MVC4 6.OD0\ 07/14/2003 DO 07/14/98 AAA 15,272.89 .02 150,000.00 RBRRILL LYME 3.207 4.975 US 100.000 155.247.00 .62 S9019BEP9 6.0751 03/01/2003 A4 1S0.000.00 .23 200,000.00 DEAN BITTER DISCOVER 6 CO 3.144 6.875 ME 100.000 204,846.00 .02 24240VMS 6.875E D3/01/2003 AI 200,000.00 .31 TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES .249 6.247 14.259.749.75 300.00 24.1OB.741.45 37.64 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL .136 2.675 64,175,672.25 100.00 64,024,663.95 100.00 YLDAHA, YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 6 OCBFO7522202 2003/02/28 RON DATE t 03/07/03 DISTRICT, TANG-TERN OPERATING RON TIME , 11.35.41 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE HARKST VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EOUIVALENTS 15,200,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LN BE CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.690 15,152,890.00 32.36 313384EXI NAT 04/16/2003 A-1. 15,152,080.00 4.19 1,500,000.00 3TDERAL HONE LN BR CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.694 1,495,412.00 3.23 313384ES4 HAT 04/23/2003 A-1. 1,495,412.00 .41 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL ROSE LN BE CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.806 1,196,284.17 2.58 313384FG9 HAT 05/07/2003 A-I+ 1,197,670.80 .33 _13,000,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LH RIG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.600 12,944,923.33 29.01 3133960GI NAT 06/24/2003 A-14 12,957,113.00 3.59 3,300,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL STU ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .ODO P-1 99.577 3,296,030.00 7.10 313508DN2 HAT 03/26/2003 A-1♦ 3,286,030.00 .91 6,700,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.403 8,654,172.75 18.31 313580FF5 RAT 05/14/2003 A-I+ 8,654,172.75 2.39 3,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.622 3,187,904.00 6.89 36959JTC0 06/12/2003 3,187,904.00 .80 315,504.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HGHT .000 1.107 AAA 100.000 315,504.75 .60 996085247 AAA 315,584A5 .09-------- _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 .001 46,233,191.00 100.D0 46,246,760.38 12.09 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF HIS .000 5.238 AAA 104.203 3,104,062.50 .99 O1F0S2433 5.500E 03/01/2018 DO 03/01/03 AAA 3,126,093.60 .87 5,000,000.00 COHNIT TO PUR MKS. SF HTG .000 5.294 AAA 103.891 5,156,250.00 1.64 O1FOS2441 5.500% 04/01/2010 DO 04/01/03 AAA 5,194,531.00 1.44 15,000,000.00 COMMIT TO POR PNNA BY HID .000 5.315 AAA 104.904 15,683,180.50 4.99 CIP060436 6.000% 03/01/2018 DO 03/01/03 AAA 15,740,657.00 4.36 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR PENN SF HTO .ODO 5.368 ARA 104.016 5,162,500.00 1.65 01F060634 6.0001 03/01/2033 DO 03/01/03 AAA 5,200,081.00 1.44 YLDAUAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE Y MBF07522202 2003/02/28 RON DAM t 03/07/03 DISTRICT. LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIM t 11.35.41 PAN VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE HAMET VALUE B TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 10,UDO,000.00 CGMNIT TO PUR GNNA SP MTO .DOD 6.131 AAA 105.320 10,500,000.00 3.34 DIND62631 6.500% 03/15/2033 DD 03/01/03 AAA 10,532,812.00 2.91 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MEN 1 TR 00459 .000 2.620 A2 100.140 099,406.00 .28 033928VC4 VAR RT 12/01/2003 DO 08/17/01 A 901,260.00 .25 248,627.40 DISTRIBUTION PINY, 99-1 CL A4 .000 5.336 101.205 253,033.05 .07 2547SM 06 5.840% 10/17/2011 DO 03/10/99 251,374.73 .03 216,900.70 PBLNC GROUP IG4-0353 .000 3.151 AAA 104.806 222,399.20 .03 3129DBNA2 3.500% 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 AAA 227,505.97 .06 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL SURE LN BE CONS DUE .000 6.436 AAA 110.698 7,997,625.00 2.63 3133MAUN1 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 0,302,379.25 2.30 103,001.55 FRLNC GROUP I70-6064 .000 3.366 AAA 202.039 100,568.95 .03 31340SME3 6.384% D1/O1/2028 DO 12/01/97 AAA IOS,183.09 .03 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL SIG RUSS DEUS .000 4.002 AAR 109.327 11,521,271.50 3.93 31359MGR2 5.250% 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AAA 12,408,66S.SB 3.43 2,747,940.90 GNMN POOL I0569358 .000 6.171 AAA 105.328 2,812,345.77 .91 362000QR3 6.500% 04/15/2032 DO 04/01/02 AAA 2,894,364.71 .00 128,132.58 GHMN II POOL 00003109 .000 3.050 AAA 106.266 135,019.31 .04 36202DR23 3.500% 07/20/2031 DO 00/01/01 ARA 136,161.67 .04 632,512.61 GNMA 11 POOL #0003152 .000 3.058 AAA 106.266 666,510.17 .21 36202DQD6 3.500% 10/20/2031 DO 10/01/01 AAA 672,147.35 .19 431,072.81 DUNA II POOL JOOS0395 .000 4.339 AAA 102.730 427,166.22 .14 36225CNN4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 AAA 443,013.31 .12 3,916,406.11 OEM II POOL 000040OX .000 4.381 AAA 102.722 3,876,709.30 1.23 36225CN28 6.5008 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 AAA 4,023,090.90 1.11 3,000,000.00 GTE NORTH INC DEB SUR A .000 5.781 Al 103.796 3,063,750.00 .98 362333AD9 6.000% 01/15/2004 DO 01/15/94 A. 3,213,000.00 .05 4,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP SEE 100615 .000 1.683 A2 99.812 3,998,440.00 1.26 33042WEBO VAR RT 06/04/2003 DO 08/03/01 BED 3,992,400.00 1.10 3,000,000.00 COLUMN SACHS GROUP INC SR HT .000 4.014 RAI 102.765 3,030,030.00 .93 30141WSI 4.125% 01/15/2009 DD 01/13/03 A4 3,002,950.00 .85 YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 MSF07522202 2003/02/20 RUN DATE 03/07/03 DISTRICTS LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 11.35.41 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NODDY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 5,000,000.00 PHILIP NORRIS COS INC EYE .000 7.116 A2 105.390 5,263,000.00 1.67 718154CHB 7.500% 04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 A- 5,269,500.00 1.46 165,904.51 PERRIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.374 AAA 100.675 170,518.72 .05 74046RFN6 6.430% 03/02/2004 DO 06/21/99 167,356.17 .05 3,838,794.33 SEA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 .ODD 5.720 AAA 110.830 3,B38,794.33 1.35 83162CWO 6.340% 03/01/2021 AAA 4,254,535.76 1.10 2,637,657.40 SEA DID PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .000 5.991 AAA 110.830 2,637,657.40 .92 831641DD4 6.640% 02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 HE 2,923,315.70 .81 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1 C .000 29.7DO B3 23.000 1,600,000.00 .11 9093179C2 6.831% 09/01/2000 DO OB/22/01 A- 368,000.00 .10 20,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.442 AAA 114.644 22,620,312.50 7.28 9128272JO 06.2501 02/15/2007 DO 02/15/97 AM 22,960,800.00 6.36 6,287,890.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT .000 3.346 AAA 115.125 6,301,057.68 2.29 9128274YS 3.875% 01/15/2009 DO 01/15/99 AM 7,230,942.57 2.00 87,100,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES .000 5.205 AAA 110.469 95,769,664.07 30.53 9120276N7 05.7506 11/15/2005 DD 11/15/00 AAA 96,218,499.00 26.63 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PER OS HER A .000 5.306 A3 108.359 3,407,680.00 1.20 927804ENO 5.750% 03/31/2006 DO 03/27/01 BB84 3,792,565.00 1.05 26,263,240.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.817 3.047 AAA 110.750 23,070,395.13 9.23 9128272N3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 AAA 29,096,538.30 8.05 3,95D,000.00 GNAC HIS 5.752 1.445 A2 99.640 3,918,768.50 1.24 370425OV5 VAR RT 00/12/2003 DO 09/17/98 BOB 3,935,700.00 1.09 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NO CUNT GLOBAL NY 5.801 1.449 Al 100.046 1,992,000.00 .63 066365DN4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A 2,000,920.00 .55 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTH ANNE DEBS 5.967 6.449 AAA 110.495 16,154,410.00 5.43 31359NFH1 7.1251 02/15/2005 OD 02/14/00 ARE, 17,136,771.50 4.74 1,459,669.44 FRLNC HULTICLAS9 NTG SEE E3 A 6.316 4.364 AAA 102.380 1,461,224.60 .47 3133WE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/97 AAA 1,994,409.57 .41 1,101,154.90 GNNA DID URIC TR 2000-9 PH 6.320 1.832 AAA 30D.439 1,101,154.90 .35 383704NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,105,988.97 .31 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 9 OCSF00522202 2003/02/28 RUN DATE 03/07/03 DISTRICT, LOUG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 11.35.41 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY NAREET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 0-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 1 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,D00,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.310 A2 IDO.593 11031,960.00 .63 073902AB1 6.050% 04/15/2003 A 2,011,860.00 .56 3,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDNARR 6.350 1.600 A3 1DO.000 3,000,ODO.00 .95 3453938R5 VAR RT 03/17/2003 DD 03/16/00 BBB 3,000,000.00 .83 15,921.35 GNNA POOL 40500917 6.389 5.316 AAA 104.973 15,112.85 .00 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 16,713.06 .00 53,175.36 HIM POOL #0506636 6.309 5.716 AAA 104.973 50,475.05 .01 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2025 DO 04/01/99 AAA 55,819.59 .02 569,385.21 GNNA POOL #0503380 6.399 5.316 AAA 104.973 540,471.12 .18 36210VF55 6.0001 03/15/2029 DO 03/01/99 AAA 597,690.80 .17 22,521.27 GEM POOL 10499153 6.389 5.016 AAA 104.973 21,333.60 .00 3621000ES 6.000% 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 23,641.18 .01 2,339.88 OHM POOL 00496204 6.390 5.016 AAA 104.973 2,221.06 .00 36210W51 6.0001 01/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 2,456.23 .00 700,358.90 GEM POOL 60496461 6.390 5.016 AAA 104.973 664,793.70 .23 36210NON4 6.0001 01/15/2029 DO O1101199 AAA 735,105.37 .20 182,990.61 GEM POOL 10491103 6.390 5.716 AAA 104.973 273,690.13 .06 36210MY4 6.0001 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 192,090.11 .05 17,167.07 GUNK POOL #0406720 6.390 5.316 AAA 104.973 16,295.97 .00 36210AVH6 6.0001 12/15/2020 DO 12/01/90 AAA 10,021.46 .00 32,409.78 OHM POOL J0497343 6.390 5.316 AAA 104.973 30,763.92 .01 3621DNP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/98 AAA 34,021.41 .01 28,121.01 OHM POOL /0469600 6.391 5.716 AM 104.973 26,693.76 .00 362092=8 6.000% 11/15/2028 DO 11/01/99 AAA 29,520.21 .Ol 33,374.34 OHM POOL 10463219 6.391 5.316 AAA 104.973 31,679.56 .01 36209CC07 6.000E 10/15/2020 DO 10/01/98 AM 35,033.93 .01 64,147.73 OHM POOL 10453814 6.391 5.316 AM 104.973 60,890.22 .02 3620808B3 6.0001 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/98 MA 67,337.58 .02 623,257.40 GMA POOL #0461206 6.391 5.316 AAA 104.973 591,607.69 .20 36209CCA2 6.000E 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/98 MA 654,249.96 .10 YLDAMI, YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 30 OCBF07522202 2D03/02/29 RUN DATE t 03/07/03 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 11.35.41 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MMKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL 743,468.28 GEM POOL 00465555 6.392 5.316 AAA 104.973 IOS,314.04 .24 36209AE48 6.0001 09/15/2020 DO 09/01/98 AM 790,430.43 .22 25,B5B.12 OHM POOL 00483452 4.392 5.712 AM 105.035 24,545.01 .00 36209MBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 09/01/98 AAA 27,160.12 .01 039,360.71 GNNA POOL #0465546 6.392 5.312 AM 105.035 701,815.05 .24 36209AET3 6.000% 00/15/2020 DO O8/01/98 AM 376,588.70 .21 672,756.73 OHM POOL 00469339 6.392 5.712 AAA 105.035 638,593.32 .22 36209DH00 6.0001 08/15/2028 DO O8/01198 AAA 706,631.11 .20 36,446.63 GNMA POOL 10438053 6.393 5.712 AM 105.035 34,595.83 .01 36207PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 AAA 38,281.38 .01 32,266.64 GNMA POOL f0468330 6.393 5.712 AM 105.035 30,629.09 .01 36309DHF4 6.000% 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 AAA 33,091.32 .01 2,547,592.90 FHLHC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.346 AM 102.42E 1,548,279.93 .50 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AM 1,585,169.35 .44 2,070,230.62 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SEW 1620E 6.499 5.643 AAA 106.324 2,714,090.68 .96 3133TVA4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AM 3,051,744.00 .84 1,000,000.00 SALOME SB SLUGS MTH 6.625 1.599 AA 100.015 1,000,000.00 .31 7954BEEES VAR RT 04/20/2003 DO 04/20/00 M- 1,000,150.00 .29 539,894.65 OHM 11 POOL IOBOOBBM 6.305 5.216 AAA 103.056 551,704.84 .13 3622SCC20 3.3359 06/20/2027 DO 09/01/97 AM 556,394.48 .15 2,000,000.00 MINE 6 MCLENNAN COS INC SR HT 6.717 6.238 A2 106.2U3 1,992,260.00 .63 531348A08 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 M- 2,124,060.00 .59 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.500 A3 103.078 2,995,080.00 .90 345397SJ3 6.700% O7/1612004 DO 07/16/99 HER 3,092,340.00 .09 2,500,D00.00 COUNTRYWIDE NONE LEE INC NT 6.066 6.441 A3 106.343 2,498,400.00 .94 22237UMB 6.850% 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2,658,575.00 .34 366,736.11 GNHA II POOL 10080023 6.992 5.428 AAA 103.636 372,810.19 .12 36225CM9 VAR. RT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AM 300,069.28 .11 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HM ASSN DENS 3.113 5.599 AAA 118.335 2,030,133.00 .38 31359HBY5 6.625% 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 AM 2,495,039.62 .69 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE f 11 OCSF07522202 2003/02/29 RUM DATE f 03/07/03 DISTRICTf LUNG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE f 11.35.41 vvvvvv=.vvvv.==vn..............envvvvnnn......=v.........v...nn.v.....................nnn..................nv..vv....v...venn PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TCTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOS YIELD S-P PRICE MUST VALUE 9 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ________-_ 2,000,000.00 SANG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 0.512 7.065 BAA3 104.266 2,151,250.00 .66 542611CT7 8.2009 03/15/2023 DO 03/26/93 A- 2,085,32O.DD .58 796,301.46 OUTSIDER SVCG COMP FM 495-0 7.564 6.689 AAA 207.050 184,667.99 .27 398301A84 3.430% 06/01/2023 DO 02/29/00 AAA 858,011.12 .24 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CA CO MT 3.582 6.613 A3 IO2.038 965,170.00 .32 345391GV9 6.350% OS/IS/2005 DO 05/24/93 BOB 1,020,780.00 .20 953,379.29 NMP/NUNTOON PAIGE 0000-11150 0.6B4 6.907 AAA 109.592 932,673.09 .32 302998GE3 3.500% 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 1,035,290.97 .29 3,OOO,OOO.0O PACIFICORP OECD EYE 9TR 00115 3.309 6.768 A3 107.859 2,950,530.00 1.02 69512EEUS 7.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,235,770.00 .90 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP OR NT 3.963 7.053 Al 111.593 1,594,032.00 .56 020002AI.5 0.975% 05/01/2005 GO DS/01/00 A4 1,785,488.00 .49 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES .985 5.114 302,484,546.61 1DO.00 315,099,894.87 B7.23 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL .960 5.026 340,710,737.69 100.00 361,346,662.25 100.00 ................. ......... Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,122,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2003 -4,122,500.00 996085247 03-Feb-2003 4,122,500.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,122,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2003 -4,122,500.00 996085247 03-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 757.21 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Feb-2003 -757.21 996087094 03-Feb-2003 757.21 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 72,145.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2003 -72,145.72 996085247 03-Feb-2003 72,145.72 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 72,145.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2003 -72.145.72 996085247 03-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,479.15 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Feb-2003 -1,479.15 996087094 03-Feb-2003 1,479.15 B 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16.15:25 Executive Workbench Q p Mellon Trust - Sample Report PAGr: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsGM10000 01-FEB-2003 - 28-FEB-2003 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTLDATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/I.OSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2003 -499,487.50 313588CR4 MAT 03/05/2003 03-Feb-2003 499.497.50 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2003 499,487.50 31358SCR4 MAT 03/052003 03-Feb.2W3 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS MC,NY 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMOO 3,200,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 03-Feb-2003 -3,200,000.00 99401K482 01.270%020/42003 DD OVID/ 03-Feb-2003 3,200,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 03-Feb-2003 -3,200,000.00 99401K482 01.270%02/04/2003 DD 021031 03-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS O4C,NY 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 230,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 03-Feb-2003 -229,772.11 313312CQI MAT 03/042003 03-Feb-2003 229,772.11 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 230,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 03-Fab-2003 -229,772,11 313312CQI MAT 03/04/2003 03-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,592.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2003 -1,592.04 996085247 04-Feb-2003 1.592.04 B 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 Eemaw WwkbfwAi, Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE) AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTLDATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,592.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2003 -1,592.04 996095247 04-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 04-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,365.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2003 -21,365.21 996085247 04.Fcb-2003 21,365.21 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,365.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Feb-2003 -21,365.21 996085247 04-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 04-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Feb-2003 -3,200,000.00 99401LO43 01.220%02/052003 DO 02/04/ 04-Feb-2003 3,200,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Feb-2003 -3,200,000.00 99401LO43 01.220%02/052003 DO 02/04/ 04-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 04-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,763.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2003 -4,763.44 9%085247 05-Feb-2003 4,763.44 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,763.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2003 4,763.44 996085247 05-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 05-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Marv2003 16:15:25 Exeeuliw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP CIS 05-Feb-2003 -1,195,345.00 313396GF4 MAT05/30/2003 05-Feb-2003 1,195,345.00 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 05-Feb-2003 -1,195,345.00 313396GF4 MAT 05/30/2003 05-Feb-2003 0.00 FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 05-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 05-Feb-2003 -2,000.000.00 9940IN452 01,180%021OW003 DD 02/051 05-Feb-2003 2,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 05-Feb-2003 -2,000,000.00 9940IN452 01.180%02/062003 DO 02/051 05-1`eb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 05-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 05-Feb-2003 -1,196,284.17 313384FG9 MAT 05/07/2003 05-Feb-2003 1,196,284.17 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 05-Feb-2003 -1,196,284.17 313384FG9 MAT 05/07/2003 05-Feb-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 05-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 65.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Feb-2003 -65.56 996085247 06-Feb-2003 65.56 B 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 Ecemaw Workbench' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGR 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE! COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 65.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASHMGMT 06-Feb-2003 -65.56 996085247 06-F6-2003 0.00 FC 06-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 06-Feb-2003 -2,000,000.00 9940IP846 01.250%02/07/2003 DD 021061 06-F6-2003 2,000,000.00 B LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 06-Feb-2003 -2,000,000.00 9940IP846 01.250%02/072003 DO 02/06/ 06-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 06-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 69.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Feb-2003 .69.44 996085247 07-Feb-2003 69.44 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 69.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Feb-2003 -69.44 996095247 07-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 07-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Feb-2003 -2,000,000.00 9940IQ711 01.1900A 02/10/2003 DO 02/07/ 07-Feb-2003 2,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Feb-2003 -2,000,000.00 9940IQ711 01.190%021102003 DO 02/07/ 07-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 07-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-1003 /6:15r25 Eeewiw Workbench Q Me110D Trust-Sam le Report PAGE. 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 22,078.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Feb-2003 -22,078.33 996085247 10-Feb-2003 22,078.33 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 22,078.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Feb-2003 -22,078.33 996085247 10-1`6-2003 0.00 FC 10-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 280,012.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Feb-2003 -280,012.66 996085247 10-Feb-2003 290,012.66 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 280,012.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Feb-2003 -280,012.66 996085247 10-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 10-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 10-Feb-2003 -2,400,000.00 9940IS535 01.250-/.02/11/2003 DD 021101 10-Feb-2003 2,400,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 10-Feb-2003 -2,400,000.00 9940IS535 01.250%02/112003 DO 021101 10-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS[NC,NY ID-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 10-Feb-2003 -498,411.25 313396FQI MAT 05/152003 II-Feb-2003 498,411.25 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 10-Ma 2003 16.15:25 6eeeullve Wwkbenbh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: -7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 10-Feb-2003 498,411.25 313396FQI MAT 05/152003 II-Feb-2003 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY I I-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,558.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT II-Feb-2003 -7.558.05 996085247 1I-Feb-2003 7,558.05 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,558.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Feb-2003 -7,558.05 996085247 11-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 11-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC I I-Feb-2003 -1,492,335.00 38142UU75 07/07/2003 11-Feb-2003 1,492,335.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC II-Feb-2003 -1,492,335.00 38142UU75 07/072003 1I-Feb-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY I I-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO I I-Feb-2003 -600,000.00 9940IT624 01.240°/h02/122003 DD 02/11/ 11-Feb-2003 600,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 11-Feb-2003 -600,000.00 9940IT624 01.2401/602/122003 DO 02111/ 11-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY I I-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-1003 /6:15:15 &ecutire Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOBS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,020.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Feb-2003 -15,020.67 996085247 12-Feb-2003 15,020.67 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,020.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Feb-2003 -15,020.67 996085247 12-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 12-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 12-Feb-2003 -500,000.00 9940IU951 01.210%02/132003 DO 02/12/ 12-Feb-2003 500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 12-Feb-2003 -500,000.00 99401 U951 01.210%02/13/2003 DO 0211 V 12-Feb-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 12-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 12-Feb-2003 400,000.00 99401VO09 01.220%02/132003 DO OV121 12-Feb-2003 600,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 12-Feb-2003 -600,000.00 99401VO09 01.220%02/13tM3 DD 02/121 12-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 12-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 12-Feb-2003 -1,099,812.08 90328BP14 02/18/2003 13-Febd003 1,099,912.09 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 10-Ma 2003 16:15:25 Exemom Wakbexh- Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO I,100,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 12-Feb-2003 -1,099,812.08 90328BP14 02/18/2003 13-Feb-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 13-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 225.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2003 -225.06 996085247 13-Feb-2003 225.06 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 225.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-F6-2003 -22.5.06 996085247 13-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 13-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,052,117.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2003 -2,052,117.61 996085247 13-Feb-2003 2,052,117.61 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,052,117.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2003 -2,052,117.61 996085247 13-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 13-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 13-Feb-2003 -399,652.78 313588CXI MAT 03/11/2003 14-Feb-2003 399,652.78 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 13-Feb-2003 -399,652.78 313588CXI MAT 03/112003 14-Feb-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 14-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16..15:25 Esew,t Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 13-Feb-2003 -698,517.36 313588EK7 MAT 04/162003 14-Feb-2003 698,517.36 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 13-Feb-2003 -698,517.36 313588EK7 MAT 04/16/2003 14-Feb-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 13-Feb-2003 -1,799,132.00 90328BPU9 02292003 14-Feb-2003 1,799,132.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 13-Feb-2003 -1,799,132.00 90328BPU9 02/28/2003 14-Feb-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,915,137.68 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2003 -3,815,137.68 996085247 14-Feb-2003 3,815,137b8 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO 3,815,137.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2003 -3,815,137.68 996085247 14-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 191,556.02 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCF 14-Feb-2003 -191,556.02 996087094 14-Feb-2003 191,556,02 B 0.00 10-M.,2003 16.15:25 Executive Wo kbe.X Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 30,219.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Feb-2003 -30,219.72 996085247 18-Feb-2003 30,219.72 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 30,219.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Feb-2003 -30,219.72 996085247 18-Fcb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,999,583.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I8-Feb-2003 -1,999,583.04 996085247 18-Feb-2003 1,999,583.04 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,999,583.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I9-Feb-2003 -1,999,583.04 996085247 18-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 7,912.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Feb-2003 -7,912.50 996085247 19-Feb-2003 7,912.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 7,912.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Feb-2003 -7,912.50 996085247 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 80,390.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Feb-2003 -80,390.63 996085247 19-Feb-2003 80,390.63 B 0.00 10-Marv2003 16:15:25 Executive B'wkbench Q Mellon Troat-Sample Report PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 80,390.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Feb2003 -80,390.63 996085247 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 19-Feb-2003 -1,499,062.50 97665SQAI 03/102003 20-Feb-2003 1,499,062.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 19-Feb-2003 -1,499,062.50 97665SQAI 03/102003 20-Feb-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-Feb-2003 -3,187,904.00 369591TC7 06/122003 24-Feb-2003 3,187,904.00 B CITIBANK CP IPA,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-Feb-2003 -3,197,904.00 36959JTC7 06/122003 24-Feb-2003 0.00 FC CITIBANK CP IPA,NEW YORK 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-Feb2003 -99,625.50 369591TB9 06/1lnW3 24-Feb-2003 99,625.50 B CITIBANK CP IPA,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMOO 100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-Feb2003 -99,625.50 36959JTB9 06/112003 24-Feb2003 0.00 FC CITIBANK CP IPA,NEW YORK 24-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Ma 2003 16:15:25 Executive Ww*bewcl' Q Mellon Trust-Sample ReIoort PAGE: -13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 937.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Feb-2003 -937.50 996085247 20-Feb-2003 937.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 937.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Feb-2003 -937.50 996095247 20-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 20-Feb-2003 -12,944,923.33 313396HGI MAT 06/24/2003 20-Feb-2003 12,944,923.33 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 20-Feb-2003 -12,944,923.33 313396HOI MAT 06/24/2003 20-F0-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,466.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2003 -15,466.49 996085247 21-Feb-2003 15,466.49 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,466.49 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2003 -15,466.49 996085247 21-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 21-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 750,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 21-Feb-2003 -750,000.00 99402C216 01.200%02242003 DO 02/2l/ 21-Feb-2003 750,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16.15:25 Erecufiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 750,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 21-Feb-2003 -750,000.00 99402C216 01.200%02/24/2003 DO 0221/ 21-Feb-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 21-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 24-Feb-2003 -997,073.61 313384FW4 MAT 05/21/2003 24-Feb-2003 997,073.61 B SMITH BARNEY INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 24-Feb-2003 -997,073.61 313384FW4 MAT 05/212003 24-Feb-2003 0.00 FC SMITH BARNEY INC,NEWYORK 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 24-Feb-2003 -1,500,000.00 99402E840 01.220%02252003 DO 0224/ 24-Feb-2003 1,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 24-Feb-2003 -1,500,000.00 99402E840 01.220%02/252003 DO 0224/ 24-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 166,301.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2003 -166,301.78 996085247 25-Feb-2003 166,301.78 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 166,301.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2003 -166,301.78 996085247 25-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 25-Feb•2003 0.00 /0-Marv2003 16.15:25 Executive Wo,kberm)r Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,564,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 25-Feb-2003 -1,561,755.66 26354BR87 04/082003 25-Feb-2003 1,561,755.66 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,564,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 25-Feb-2003 -1,561.755.66 26354BR87 04/082003 25-Feb-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 25-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 96,159.65 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Feb-2003 -96,159.65 996085247 26-Feb-2003 96,159.65 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 96,159.65 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Feb-2003 -96,159.65 996085247 26-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 26-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,025,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASHMGMT 28-Feb-2003 -1,025,000.00 996085247 28-Feb-2003 1,025,000.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,025,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2003 -1,025,000.00 996085247 28-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 28-Feb-2003 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA SF MTG 06-Jen-2003 -5,137,500.00 0IF060626 6.000%02/OU2033 DD 021011 13-Feb-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 13-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-1003 16::15:23 Erecudw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-3en-2003 -3,128,437.50 01F06D426 6.00D°A 0210112018 DO 021011 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Jm-2003 -6,236,875.00 DIF060428 6.000%02/012019 DD 021011 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 15-Jon-2003 -3,095,625.00 0IF052425 5.50D°A 02/012018 DO 02101/ 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 15-Ien-2003 -6,256,875.OD 0IF060428 6.000°A0 2/0 120 18 DO 02/01/ 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-Jen-2003 -2,096,875.00 OIN062623 6.500°%02/152033 DID 021011 20-Feb-2003 0.D0 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 20-Fcb-20D3 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 17-Jm-2003 -8,397,500.00 OIN062623 6.500%0211 520 3 3 DO 02/01/ 20-Feb-2003 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 07-Feb-2003 -5,162.500.00 0IF060634 6.000%03/012033 DO 03/01/ 13-Mer2003 5,162,500.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 10-Marv1003 16:15:15 Ereculim JVwkbemN Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST) TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 -5,156,250.00 01F052441 5.500%04/012019 DO 041011 21-Apr-2003 5,156,250.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 650,000.00 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC 12-Feb-2003 -677,046.50 077858AA6 5.875%02101/2004 DD 02/0119 18-Feb-2003 677,046.50 B SPEAR LEEDS&KELLOGG,NEW Y 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 650,000.00 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC 12-F6-2003 -1,903.30 077858AA6 5.875%02/012004 DO 02/01/9 18-Feb-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 650,000.00 BELL ATLANTIC-NEW JERSEY INC 12-Feb-2003 -678,849.80 077858AA6 5.875%02/012004 DO 02/01/9 18-Feb-2003 0.00 PC SPEAR LEEDS&KELLOGG,NEW Y 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 GILLETTE CO NT 12-F6-2003 -256,012.50 375766AC6 6.2501%09/152003 DO 0811& 18-Feb-2003 256,012.50 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 GILLETTE CO NT 12-F6-2003 -130.21 375766AC6 6.230%09/IM003 DO 08/16/ 18-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 GILLETTE CO NT 12-Feb-2003 -256,142.71 375766AC6 6.250%09/152003 DO 08116/ 18-Feb-2003 0.00 FC ADVERT CO,HARTFORD 18-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-1003 16:15:25 Executive Workbexh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFJ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN#TR001 12-Feb-2003 -300,227.10 38141EED7 VAR RT 08/18,7003 DO 0811610 18-Feb-2003 300,227.10 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN#7R001 12-F6-2003 -300,227.10 38141EED7 VAR RT08/182003 DO 0811610 18-Feb-2003 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 18-Feb.2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTO 12-F6-2003 -3,104,062.50 0IF052433 5.500%03/012018 DO 031011 18-Mar-2003 3,104,062.50 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-1`eb-2003 -6,273,750.00 0IF060436 6.000%03/012018 DO 03/011 18-Mar-2003 6,273,750.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-F6-2003 -3,137,812.50 0IF060436 6.0009%03/012018 DO 03/011 18-Mar-2003 3,137,912.50 B LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 -6,275,625.00 0IF060436 6.000°A 03/012018 DO 031011 18-Mar-2003 6,275,625.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEES 13-Feb-2003 -3,321,088.00 31359MEMI 5.125%021132004 DD 02/OB/9 14-Feb-2003 3,321,088.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 IO-Mm 2003 16.d5:15 Executive Workbench' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DEBS 13-Feb-2003 -81,544.45 31359MEM1 5.125%021132004 DO 02108/9 14-Feb-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 13-Feb-2003 -3,402,632.45 31359MEMI 5.125%02/13/2004 DD 0208/9 14-Feb-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 14-Feb-2003 -5,929,828.13 912810DOO 11.875%11/152003 DO 101051 18-Feb-2003 5,928,928.13 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 14-Feb-2003 -171,400.21 91281ODGO 11.875%II/152003 DD 101051 18-Feb-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS I4-Feb-2003 -6,100,228.34 91281ODGO 11.875%11/152003 DO 101051 18-Feb-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Feb-2003 -2,100,000.00 OIN062631 6.500%0311512033 DO 031011 20-Mu-2003 2,100,000.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Feb-2003 -8,400,000.00 OIND62631 6.500%03/152033 DO 03/01/ 20-Mar-2003 9,400,000.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 10-Mar-1003 16:15:25 Erecufiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINRASS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 18-Fcb-2003 -323,156.25 91281ODGO 11.875%II/15/2003 DO 101051 18-Feb-2003 323,156.25 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 18-Feb-2003 -9,349.10 912810DG0 11.875%11/15/2003 DO 10/051 18-Feb-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 18-Feb-2003 -332,505.35 912810DOO 11.875%11/15/2003 DO 101051 18-Feb-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,350,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS SYS 25-Feb-2003 -1,399,963.50 3133IH607 6.40%01/23/2004 DO 01/01/19 26-Feb-2003 1,399,963.50 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,350,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS SYS 25-Feb-2003 -6,682.50 3133IH6G7 6.40%01/23/2004 DO 01/01/19 26-Feb-2003 0.00 U3 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,350,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS SYS 25-Feb-2003 -1,406,646.00 31331H6G7 6.40%01/23/2004 DO 01/01/19 26-Fcb-2003 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 26-1`6-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC NTS 25-Feb-2003 -519,405.00 695629CE3 6.450%12/01/2003 DD 12101/9 26-Feb-2003 519,405.00 B SPEAR LEEDS&KELLOGG,NEW Y 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 Ececutiv[Workbeaeh Q Mellon Tmst-Sample Report PAGE- 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC NTS 25-Feb-2003 -7,614.59 695629CE3 6.450%12101/2003 DO 12,'01/9 26-Feb-2003 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 PAINE WEBBER GROUP INC NIS 25-Feb-2003 -527,019.58 695629CE3 6.450%12/01/2003 DO 12'01N 26-Feb-2003 0.00 FC SPEAR LEEDS&KELLOGG,NEW 26-Feb-2003 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,279.76 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Feb2003 -14,279.76 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11101/9 01-Feb-2003 14.279.76 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,279.76 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 01-Feb-2003 .14,279.76 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/01/9 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 19-Feb-2003 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,800,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 03-Feb-2003 3,800,000.00 9940IJ329 01.280%02/032003 DO 01/31/ 03-Feb-2003 3,800,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,800,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 03-Feb-2003 405.33 9940IJ329 01.280%02/032003 DO 01/31/ 03-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 10-Ua 2003 16.15:25 Euc.l a Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,800,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 03-Feb-2003 3,800,405.33 9940IJ329 01.280%02/03/2003 DO 011311 03-Feb-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -757.21 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 04-Feb-2003 757.21 996087094 04-Feb-2003 -757.21 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,479.15 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 04-Feb-2003 1,479.15 996087094 04-Feb-2003 -1,479.15 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200.000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 04-1`eb-2003 3,200,000.00 994OIK482 01.270%02/04/2003 DO 02/03/ 04-1`6-2003 -3,200,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC-NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 04-Feb-2003 112.89 994OIK482 01.270%02/04/2003 DID 02/03/ 04-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200.000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 04-Feb-2003 3,200,112.89 99401 K482 01170%02/042003 DO 021031 04-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 04-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,196,284.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2003 1,196,284.17 996085247 05-Feb-2003 -1,196,284.17 S 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16.15:25 Executive WorkbeneR' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE OAINADSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,196,294.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 05-Feb-2003 1,196,284.17 996085247 05-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 05-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Feb-2003 3,200,000.00 99401LO43 01.220%02M52003 DD 02/041 05-Feb-2003 -3,200,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Feb-2003 108.44 99401LO43 01.220%02/052003 DO 021041 05-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3200.000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Feb-2003 3.200.109.44 99401LO43 01.220%02/052003 DO 02/04/ 05-Feb-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 05-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 06-Feb-2003 2,000,000.00 9940IN452 01.180%02/06/2003 DD 02/05/ 06-Feb-2003 -2,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .2,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 06-1`0-2003 65.56 9940IN452 01.180%D210612003 DO 02/05/ 06-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 06-Feb-2003 2,000,065.56 9940IN452 01.190%02/06/2003 DD 02/05/ 06-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 06-Feb-2003 0.00 20-Mao2003 16.15:25 EFecutive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 07-Feb-2003 2,000,000.00 99401PS46 01.250%02/07/2003 DO 02/06/ 07-Feb-2003 -2,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,00D.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 07-Fe1-2003 69.44 9940IP846 01.250%02/072003 DO 02/06/ 07-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 07-Feb-2003 2,000,069.44 99401PS46 01.250%02/07/2003 DO 02/W 07-Feb-2003 0.0D PC LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 07-Feb-20D3 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 10-Feb-2003 2,000,000.00 9940IQ711 01.1905/.02/102003 DO 02/071 10-Feb-2003 -2,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 10-Feb-2003 198.33 99401Q711 01.190%02/102003 DO 021071 10-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO I0-Feb-2003 2,000,198.33 99401Q711 01.190%02/102003 DO 02/07/ 10-Feb-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS MG NY 10-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -68,507.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-Feb-2003 68,507.92 996085247 11-Feb-2D03 -68,507.92 S 0.00 10-Mar-1003 16.15:25 Executive Wwkbewff Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -68,507.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT II-Feb-2003 68,507.92 996095247 II-Feb-2003 0.00 PC II-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 1 I-Feb-2003 2,400,000.00 9940IS535 01.250%02/11/2003 DO 02/101 11-Feb-2003 -2,400,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO •2,400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO I I-Feb-2003 83.33 9940IS535 01,250%02/112003 DD 02/101 11-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 11-Feb-2003 2,400,083.33 9940IS535 01.250%02/112003 DO 02/10/ 11-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY II-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 12-Feb-2003 600,000.00 9940IT624 01.240%02/12/2003 DO 02/11/ 12-Feb-2003 -600,000.00 S LEI[MAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 12-Feb-2003 20.67 9940IT624 01.2409/o 02/122003 DO 02/11/ 12-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 12-Feb-2003 600,020.67 9940IT624 01.2400/002/12/2003 DD 02/11/ 12-Feb-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 12-Feb-2003 0.00 10-M.,2003 16.15:25 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 13-Feb-2003 500,000.00 9940IU951 01.210%02/132003 DO 021121 13-Feb-2003 -500,000.00 S LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO ,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 13-Feb-2003 16.81 99401 U951 01.2101/.02/132003 DO 02/12/ 13-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 13-Feb-2003 500,016.81 9940IU951 01.210%02/132003 DD 02/121 13-Feb-2003 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 13-Feb-2003 600,000.00 99401VO09 01.220%OV132003 DO 021121 13-Feb-2003 600,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 13-Feb-2003 20.33 99401V009 01.220%02J132003 DO 021121 13-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 13-Feb.2003 600,020.33 994DIV009 01.220%02/132003 DO 02112/ 13-F6.2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -30,999.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 14-Feb-2003 30,999.98 996085247 14-Feb.2003 -30,999.98 S 0.00 10-Mar.2003 16:15:25 Eaxcushit Workbe kh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE- 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 GCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -30,999.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2003 30,999.98 996085247 14-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 14-Feb-2003 199,972.11 90328BP14 02/182003 14-F6-2003 -199,965.83 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 6.28 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 14-Feb-2003 199,972.12 90328BP14 02/18/2003 14-Feb-2003 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -180,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 14-Feb-2003 179,615.25 313384CB3 MAT 02/192003 14-Feb-2003 -179,615.15 S SMITH BARNEY INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -180,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 14-Feb-2003 355.50 313384CB3 MAT 02/19/2003 14-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -180,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 14-Feb-2003 179,970.75 313384CB3 MAT 02/192003 14-Feb-2003 0.00 PC SMITH BARNEY INC,NEW YORK 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -191,556.02 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 18-Feb-2003 191,556.02 996087094 18-Feb-2003 -191,556.02 S 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE- 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,179,645.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Feb-2003 11,179,645.62 996085247 20-Feb-2003 -11,179,645.62 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,179,645.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Feb-2003 11,179,645.62 996085247 20-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -66.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2003 66.17 996085247 21-Fcb-2003 -66.17 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -66.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2003 66.17 996085247 21-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 21-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -190,809.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Feb-2003 190,809.93 996085247 24-Feb-2003 -190,809.83 S 0,00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -190,809.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Feb-2003 190,809.83 996085247 24-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -39,624.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Feb-2003 38,624.11 996085247 24-Feb-2003 -38,624.11 S 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16.15:25 Exxutim Wo kbeneh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -38,624.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Feb-2003 38,624.11 996085247 24-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -750,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Feb-2003 750,000.00 99402C216 01.200%02242003 DO 02121/ 24-Feb-2003 -750,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -750,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Feb-2003 75.00 99402C216 01.200%02/242003 DO 02211 24-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -750,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 24-Feb-2003 750,075.00 99402C216 01.200%02242003 DO 0221/ 24-Feb-2003 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 24-Feb-2003 2,987,300.00 313588DN2 MAT 03262003 24-Feb-2003 -2,987,300.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 21-Feb-2003 9,725.00 313588DN2 MAT 03262003 24-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 24-Feb-2003 2,997,025.00 313588DN2 MAT 03262003 24-Feb-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 25-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mo,-2003 16:15:25 E..f, a Wmkhmh Q Mellon Trust- Sam le Report PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -61,704.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2003 61,704.93 996085247 25-Feb-2003 -61,704.93 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -61,704.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2003 61,704.83 996095247 25-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 25-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 25-Feb-2003 1,500,000.00 99402ES40 01.220%0225/2003 DD 02241 25-Feb-2003 -1,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 25-Feb-2003 50.83 994026840 01.220%02/252003 DO 0224/ 25-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 25-Feb-2003 1,500,050.83 99402E840 01.220%0212512003 DO 0224/ 25-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 25-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -11800,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 26-Feb-2003 1,799,872.00 90328BPU9 02282003 26-Feb-2003 -1,799,132.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 740.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,800,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 26-Feb-2003 1,799,872.00 90328BPU9 02282003 26-Feb-2003 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 26-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -230,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 26-Feb-2003 229,772.11 313312CQI MAT 03/04/2003 26-Feb-2003 -229,772.11 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -230,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 26-Feb-2003 181.12 313312CQI MAT 03/042003 26-Feb-2003 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -230,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 26-Feb-2003 229,953.23 313312CQI MAT 03/04/2003 26-Feb-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 26-Feb-2003 0.00 FIRED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Feb-2003 5,181,835.94 0IF060626 6.000%02/012033 DO 02/01/ 13-Feb-2003 5,137,500.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 44,335.94 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA SF MTG 07-Feb-2003 5,181,835.94 0IF060626 6.000%02/012033 DO 02/011 13-Feb-2003 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 13-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 12-Feb-2003 3,112,265.63 0IF052425 5.500°h 0 2/0120 1 8 DO 02/01/ 19-Fe6-2003 -3,095,625.00 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 16,640.63 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 12-Feb-2003 3,112,265.63 0IF052425 5.500%02/01/2018 DO 021011 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:13:25 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 6,283,125.00 0IF060428 6.0001/.02/01/2018 DO 02/01/ 19-Feb-2003 -6,256,875.00 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 26,250.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 6,283,125.00 0IF060428 6.000%02/01/2019 DD 02/01/ 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 3,141,562.50 0IF060428 6.000%02/01/2018 DO 02/01/ 19-Feb-2003 -3,128.437.50 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13,125.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Feb-2003 3,141,562.50 0IF060428 6.000%02/01/2018 DO 02/01/ 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF NITG 12-Feb-2003 6,281,2%00 0IF060428 6.0005/.02/012018 DD 02/01/ 19-Feb-2003 -6,256,875.00 S BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 24,375.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTO 12-Feb-2003 6,281,250.00 0IF060428 6.000%02/012018 DD 02/01/ 19-Feb-2003 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Feb-2003 8,412,197.50 OIN062623 6.500%02/152033 DO 02/01/ 20-Feb-2003 -8,395,500.00 S WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 16,687.50 /0-Mar2003 16.15.25 Executive Wo kbeueB Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Feb-2003 8,412,187.50 OIN062623 6.500%02/15/2033 DD 02/01/ 20-Feb-2003 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF 65TG 18-Feb-2003 2,103,046.97 DIN062623 6.500%02/1 512 0 3 3 DO 02/011 20-Feb-2003 -2,098,875.00 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 4,171.87 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 1 B-Feb-2003 2,103,046.87 OIN062623 6.500%02/15/2033 DO 02/01/ 20-Feb-2003 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 20-Feb-2003 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,681,65 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 01-Jan-2003 4,681.65 31348SWZ3 6.394%01/01/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-3m-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,000.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Jan-2003 -34,000.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 01-Jen-2003 34,036.72 PDC 36.22 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,000.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-ten-2003 34,000.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 01-lea-2003 -34,036.72 PD -36.22 10-Mar-1003 16.15:25 &emlve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re rt PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,000.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Jen-2003 34,000.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 014en-2003 0.00 FC 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,395.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2003 13,395.00 9128274Y5 3,875%01/152009 DO 01/15/ 15-Ln4003 -13,423.03 PD .28.03 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,395.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2003 13,395.00 9128274Y5 3.875%0 111 5/2 0 09 DO 01/151 15-Jan-2003 0.00 FC 28-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,890.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-lea-2003 55,890.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 15-Jee-2003 49,112.43 PD 6,777.57 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,890.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 154an-2003 55.890.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 01/15/ 15-Jen-2003 0.00 FC 28-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -203,577.63 SBA GTD PARK CTFS SBIC-PS 0 01-Feb-2003 203,577.63 831641DD4 6.640%02/102011 DO 02211 01-Feb-2003 -203,577.63 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -203,577.63 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 01-Fe62003 203,577.63 831641DD4 6.640%02/102011 DO 02211 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 10-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Marv2003 16:15:23 Eeeculive Wo k6nx8 Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000/0000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OM-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMM DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,020.89 FHLMC GROUP 8G4.0353 01-Feb-2003 1,020.89 3128DBMA2 7,500%10/012004 DD 03/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -1,046.73 PD -25.84 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,020.89 FHLMC GROUP WG4-0353 01-Feb-2003 1,020.89 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DO 03/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC IB-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,053.74 GNMA POOLs0506636 01-Feb-2003 1,053.74 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -1,000,23 PD 53.51 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,053.74 GNMA POOL60506636 01-Feb-2003 1,053.74 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.694.95 GNMA POOL40469688 01-Feb-2003 1,694.95 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028 DD I 1/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -1,59939 PD 85.56 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,694.95 GNMA POOLOD469689 01-Feb-2003 1,684.95 36209EXRB 6.000%11/152028DD11/01/ 01•Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -56.88 GNMA POOL 00468330 01-Feb-2003 56.88 36209DHF4 6.0009%05/15/2029 DD 051011 01-Feb-2003 -53.99 PD 2.89 10-Mar2003 16.,15:25 EeeeutNe Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -56.88 GNMA POOLT0468330 01-Feb-2003 56.88 36209DHF4 6.000°.605/152028DD05/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34.86 GNMA POOLN0483452 01-Feb-2003 3C86 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/011 01-Feb-2003 .33.09 PD 1.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .34.96 GNMA POOL40483452 01-Feb-2003 34.86 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -335.33 GNMA POOLN0486720 01-Feb-2003 335.33 36210AVM6 6.000%1 2/1 5 2 02 8 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -318.30 PD 17.03 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -335.33 GNMA POOL80486720 01-Feb-2003 335.33 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,134.45 GNMA POOL80496461 01-Feb-2003 12,134.45 36210MQN4 6.0001/.01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -11,518.25 PD 616.20 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,134.45 GNMA POOL80496461 01-Feb-2003 12,134.45 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 Eeemtive Wmkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2.89 GNMA POOL#0496284 01-Feb-2003 2.89 36210M151 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -2.74 PD 0.15 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2.89 GNMA POOLM0496284 01-Feb-2003 2.89 36210MJ51 6.000%01/152029 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,715.40 GNMA POOL 80503388 01-Feb-2003 11,715.40 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029 DO 031011 01-Feb-2003 -11,120.48 PD 594.92 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,715A0 GNMA POOLN0503388 01-Feb-2003 11,715.40 36210VF55 6.000%0311 5/2 02 9 DD 03/01/ 01-F6-2003 0.00 FC I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -376.28 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Feb-2003 376.28 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029 DO 04101/ 01-Feb-2003 -357.17 PD 19.11 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 376.28 GNMA POOL 90500917 01-Feb-2003 376.28 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029 DD 04/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32.94 GNMA POOL80499153 01-Feb-2003 32.94 3621000E5 6.000'/002/152029DD02/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -31.27 PD 1.67 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 &emim Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re or1 PAGE 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -32.94 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Feb-2003 32.94 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029DD02/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,125.41 GNMA POOL 00497343 01-Feb-2003 2,125.41 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -2,017.49 PD 107.93 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,125.41 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Feb-2003 2,125.41 36210NP45 6,000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.27 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Feb-2003 55.27 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -52.46 PD 2.81 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.27 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Feb-2003 55.27 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,427.09 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Feb-2003 13,427.09 36209AE48 6.000%0 911 52 02 8 DO 09/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -12,745.25 PD 691.84 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,427.09 GNMA POOLN0465555 01-Feb-2003 13,427.09 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 /0.Ua -2003 16.15:25 a,.Yive Wo kte.fi Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE CAIN/IASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,10902 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Feb-2003 24,109.02 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028 DD 0S/0l/ 01-Feb-2003 -22,984.73 PD 1,224.29 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,109.02 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Feb-2003 24,109.02 36209AET3 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 08/011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -48.44 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Feb-2003 48.44 36207PTN9 6.000°A05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -45.99 PD 2.46 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .49.44 GNMA POOL#0439057 01-Feb-2003 48.44 36207PTN9 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 05/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,063.77 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 01-Feb-2003 16,063.77 36225CNM4 VAR RT 0420/2030 DO 04/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -15,918.19 PD 145.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,063.77 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 01-Feb-2003 16,063.77 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/202030 DID 04/011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,889.40 GNMA 11 POOL#0090023 01-Feb-2003 37,889.40 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 12/01/9 01-Feb-2003 -38,516.94 PD -627.54 10-Mar-1003 16.15:25 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCS&CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFI COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,889.40 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Feb-2003 37,889.40 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 1210119 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,477.62 GNMA II POOL#0003109 01-Feb-2003 13,477.62 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DO 07/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -14,202.04 PD -724.42 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,477.62 GNMA U POOL#0003109 01-Feb-20D3 13,477.62 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DD07/011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -135,942.68 GNMA POOL#0569339 01-Feb-2003 135,842.68 362000QK3 6.500%04/152032 DD 04/01/ 01-Feb-2D03 -139,026.49 PD -3,183.81 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -135,842.68 GNMA POOL#0569358 01-Feb-2003 135,842.68 362000QK3 6.500%D4/152032DD04/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,409.73 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Feb-2003 4,409.73 36210FRY4 6.00004 0111 52 0 2 9 DO 01/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -4,185.80 PD 223.93 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,409.73 GNMA POOL 00491103 01-Feb-2003 4,409.73 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029 DD 01/011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC I8-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 Erecwm Workbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE. 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -1,453.14 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-Feb-2003 1,453.14 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -1,379.35 PD 73.79 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -1,453.14 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-Feb-2003 1,453.14 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 101011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 184eb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -38,626.54 GNMA POOL#0467286 01-Feb-2003 38,626.54 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -36,665.04 PD 1,%1.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -38,626.54 GNMA POOL#0467286 01-F6-2003 38,626.54 36209CCX2 6.0001.1 0/1 512 02 8 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -953.64 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Feb-2003 953.64 36209DHQD 6.000%08/15/2028 DD OS/0l/ 01-Feb-2003 -905.21 PD 48.43 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -953.64 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-F6-2003 953.64 36209DHQO 6.0008/608/152028DD0S/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .62,403.37 GNMA II POOL#0003152 01-Feb-2003 62,403.37 36202DQD6 7.500%10/202031 DD 10/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -65,757.55 PD -3,354.18 10-Mar-2003 16.'15:25 Exeeul1w Warkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 42 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000/0000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFJ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMM DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .62,403.37 GNMA II POOL#0003152 01-Feb-2003 62,403.37 36202DQD6 7.500%10202031 DO 10/011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,747.80 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 01-Feb-2003 44,747.80 36225CC20 7.375%ON202027 DO 061011 01-F6.2003 -45,726.66 PD -979.96 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,747.80 GNMA II POOL N080088M 01-Feb-2003 44,747.80 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06101/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -119,120.75 GNMA II POOL 8080408X 01-Feb-2003 119,120.75 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DD 05/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -117,910.93 PD 1,209.82 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -119,120.75 GNMA 11 POOL 0090409X 01-Feb-2003 119,120.75 36225CN28 6.500Yo05202030 DO 05/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,359.10 FHLMC GROUP#786064 01-Feb-2003 3,359.10 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12101/ 01-Feb-2003 -3,277.22 PD 81.88 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -153,978.54 FIILMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 01-Feb-2003 153,978.54 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 01-Feb-2003 ,154,046.91 PD -68.37 10-Mar-2003 16.-15:25 Executive Workbenth Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -153,978.54 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI 1 A6 01-Feb-2003 153,978.54 3133TDPV2 6.500%09/25/2018 01-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 25-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,357.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Feb-2003 43,357.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DO 12/011 01-Feb-2003 -43,403.19 PD -46.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -680.69 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01-Feb-2003 680.69 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 0229/0 01-Feb-2003 -670.75 PD 9.94 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -690.69 GREYSTONE SVCNO CORP FHA#95 OI-Feb•2003 680.69 39810MAE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 0229/0 01-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 25-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -717.79 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE M000-11150 01-Feb-2003 717.79 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 102119 01-Fcb-2003 -702.20 PD 15.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,844.71 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 09-Feb-2003 27,844.71 74046RFW6 6,430%03/082004 DO 0621/9 08-Feb-2003 -28,619.14 PD -774.43 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .27,844.71 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-Feb-2003 27,844.71 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DO 0621N 08-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 10-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16.15:25 Executive Wwkbench Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 44 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50,363.33 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Feb-2003 50,363.33 25475MAD6 5.840%10/17/2011 DO 03/1 B/ 15-Feb-2003 -51,417.81 PD -1,054.48 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50,363.33 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Feb-2003 50,363.33 25475MAD6 5.840%10/17/2011 DD03/18/ 15-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,114.% GNMA GTD REMIC TR 20OD-9 FH 16-Feb-2003 33,114.96 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Feb-2003 -33,114.96 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,114.96 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Feb-2003 33,114.96 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Feb-2003 0.00 PC 18-FeW003 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -201,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2003 200,690.96 313588BKO MAT 02/03/2003 03-Feb-2003 -200,690.96 MT 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -122,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 11-F6-2003 121,775.92 313396BT9 MAT 02/11/2003 11-Feb-2003 -121,775.92 MT II-Feb-2003 0.00 /0-Marv2003 16:15:25 Esec.ti4 Workbench Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE. 45 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 14-Feb-2003 3,791,766.67 313588BW4 MAT 02/142003 14-Feb-2003 -3,791,766.67 MT 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,800,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 14-Feb-2003 1,799,070.00 90328BPE5 02/142003 14-Feb-2003 -1,799,070.00 MT 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC I8-Feb-2003 899,846.25 90328BP14 02/18/2003 18-Feb-2003 -899,846.25 MT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 20-Feb-2003 1,497,506,25 63743DPL9 02202003 20-Feb-2003 -1,497,506.25 MT 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -640,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS SYST 21-Feb-2003 638,584.00 313384CD9 MAT 02212003 21-Feb-2003 -638,584.00 MT 21-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,808,000.00 MERCK&CO INC DISC 24-Feb-2003 1,905,948.49 58933SPQS 02/24/2003 24-Feb-2003 -1,805,848.48 MT 24-Feb-2003 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -113,821.02 FHLMC GROUP#G5-0476 01-Feb-2003 113,921.02 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DD 02/01/ 01-Feb-2003 -115,603.12 MT 01-Feb-2003 -1,782.10 10-Mar-2003 16.15:23 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 46 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000100W 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMOO 400,000.00 NATURAL RURAL UITLS COOP FM 10-Feb-2003 400,000.00 637432CK9 7.375%02/102003 DO 0211010 ID-Feb-2003 -413,064.00 MT 10-Feb-2003 -13,064.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH&CO BONDS 12.Feb-2003 500,000.00 590188HZ4 6.000%02/122003 DO 02/121 12-Feb-2003 -508,160.00 MI 12-Feb-2003 .8,160.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 13.Feb-2003 2,000,000.00 345397RV7 FLTO RT 02/132003 DO 021131 13-Feb-2003 -1,992,580.00 MT 13-Feb-2003 7,420.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP 8TR 00562 14-Feb-2003 3,900,000.00 37042WZKO VAR RT 02J142003DD02/14/ 14-Feb-2003 -3,793,958.00 MT 14-Feb-2003 6,042.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 466,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS I4-Feb-2003 466,000.00 31359MHA4 5.000%02/142003 DO 022310 14-Feb-2003 471,764.42 MT I4-Feb-2003 .5,764.42 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -193,000.00 PIT74EY BOWES CR CORP NT 15-Feb-2003 193,000.00 724477AKO 9.900%02/152003 DO 0211V 15-Feb-2003 -203,794.49 MT 15.Feb-2003 -10,794.49 LIQUID OPER-PIMOO -6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-Feb-2003 6,000,000.00 912827J78 06.250%02/152003 DO 02/151 15-Feb-2003 -4219,531.25 MT 15-Feb-2003 -219,531.25 /0-Mar-2003 16.15:23 Ettav/hr Wokbemb Qit Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 18-Feb-2003 100,000.00 3133M3EZ4 6.0009%02/18/2003 DO OV1819 18-Feb-2003 -101,262.00 MT 18-Feb-2003 -1,262.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MN 20-Feb-2003 1,400,000.00 81240QGW6 6.540%02/20/2003 DO 0220/ 20-Feb-2003 -1,438,920.00 MT 20-Feb-2003 -38,920.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -125,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MN 21-Feb-2003 125,000.00 3136FOYW6 VAR RT 0221/2003 DO 08/21/ 21-Feb-2003 -124,960.94 MT 21-Feb-2003 39.06 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 28-Feb-2003 1,000,000.00 3133MDGE7 5.000%02/282003 DO 0228/0 28-Feb-2003 -1,011,250.00 MT 28-Fe6-2003 -11,250.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 NABISCO INC NTS 03-Feb-2003 4,000,000.00 629527CA8 VAR RT 0 2/012 03 3 DO 01/22/9 03-Feb-2003 4,081,440.00 CAL -81,440.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 NABISCO INC FITS 03-Feb-2003 4,000,000.00 629527CA8 VAR RT 02/012033 DD 0122/9 03-Feb-2003 0.00 FC 03-Feb-2003 0.00 INTEREST 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 &eculiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 48 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 NABISCO INC NTS 03-Feb-2003 122,500.00 629527CAS VAR RT 02/012033 DO 01/22/9 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2003 757.21 996085247 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Feb-2003 1,479.15 996085247 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 201,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 03-Feb-2003 309.04 313588BKO MAT 02/032003 03-F6-2003 0.00 IT 03-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GENERAL WES ACCEP MTN 40061 04-Feb-2003 20,609.00 37042WE90 VAR RT 08/042003 DD 08/03/ 04-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 04-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 NATURAL RURAL UITLS COOP FM 10-Feb-2003 14,750.00 637432CK9 7.375%02/102003 DD 02/10/0 10-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 10-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 203,577.63 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 10-Feb-2003 47,552.15 831641DD4 6.640%02/102011 DD 02/211 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 10-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Marv2003 16.15:25 EeecuHve WoAbenclf Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: -49 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,844.71 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 10-Feb-2003 1,039.17 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DO 06/21/9 08-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 10-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH SR NT 10-Feb-2003 7,285.00 046003KH1 FLTG RT 05/082003 DO 051081 08-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 10-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT I I-Feb-2003 7,558.05 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/112003 DO 05/1U II-Feb-2003 0.00 IT II-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 122,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 11-F6-2003 224.18 313396BT9 MAT 02/112003 11-Feb-2003 0.00 IT II-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH&CO BONDS 12-Feb-2003 15,000.00 590188HZ4 6.0001%02/122003 DD 02/12/ 12-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 12-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 13-Feb-2003 7,781.67 345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 07113! 13-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 13-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 14-Feb-2003 2,962.50 3133M55B2 5.925%08/14/2003 DO 08/14/ 14-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 14-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 Eeecutm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 50 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATFJ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 14-Feb-2003 8,233.33 313588BW4 MAT 02/14/2003 14-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I4-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 14-Feb-2003 930.00 90328BPE5 02/142003 14-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 14-1`e6-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP BTR 00562 14-Feb-2003 15,137.68 37042WZKO VAR RT 02/14/2003 DO 021141 14-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 466,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 14-Feb-2003 I Lm.27 31359MHA4 5.000%02/142003 DD 02/23/0 14-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 14-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 18-Feb-2003 3,000.00 3133M3EZ4 6,000%02/18/2003 DD 0211819 18-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS I8-Feb-2003 267,187.50 3133MAUN7 7,125%02/I52005 DO 02/0810 15-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 18-Feb-2003 552,187.50 31359MFHI 7.125%07J152005 DO 02114/0 15-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Ma,2003 16:15:25 Execuliw Wmkbenea Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: ^51 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARFSIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS I8-Feb-2003 82,000.00 31359MEMI 5.125%02/13/2004 DO 02/00 15-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DW MTN 8TRO03 18-Feb-2003 35,625.00 61745EQN4 7.125%08/152003 DD 0811010 15-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 193,D00.00 PITNEY BOWES CR CORP NT IB-Feb-2003 8,492.00 724477AKO 8.8001%02/15/2003 DO 02/12/ 15-Feb-2003 0.00 IT IB-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-Feb-2003 187,500.00 912827/78 06.250%02/152D03 DO 021151 15-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Fcb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,00D.00 U S TREASURY NOTES I&Fcb-2003 625,000.00 9128272/0 06.250%02/152007 DO 02/151 15-Feb-2003 0,00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,681.65 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 I9-Feb-2003 441.53 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-1en-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34.86 GNMA POOL80483452 18-Feb-2003 129.46 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mw-2003 16:15.25 Emcul(ve Wo kkmh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 52 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 18-Feb-2003 153.75 90328BPJ4 02/18/2003 18-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 335.33 GNMA POOLND486720 I8-Feb-2003 87.52 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2029 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 135,842.69 GNMA POOL 00569359 18-Feb-2003 15,620.49 362000QK3 6.500%04/15/2032 DO 04/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,020.89 FHLMC GROUP#04-0353 18-Feb-2003 1,362.06 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DO 03/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,409.73 GNMA POOLs0491103 I8-Feb-2003 937.00 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029 DO 01/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2.99 GNMA POOL#0496284 18-Feb-2003 11.71 36210M151 6,000%01/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,134.45 GNMA POOLs0496461 18-Feb-2003 3,562.47 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 /0-Marv2003 16:15:25 Executive orkbem)f' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,125.41 GNMA POOL80497343 19-Feb-2003 172.68 36210NP45 6.D00%17JIS12028 DD 121011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32.94 ONMA POOL804991$3 IS-Feb-2003 112.77 3621000E5 6.000%0 211 5 2 029 DO 02/011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT IS-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 376.29 ONMA POOL8050D917 I8-Feb-2D03 91.49 36210SPAO 6.00D%04/152029DD04,0l/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 O.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,715.40 GNMA POOL40503388 18-Feb-2003 2,905.50 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029 DO 03/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,363.33 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-I CL A4 I9-Feb-2003 1,455.09 25475MAD6 5.840%10/172011 DD 031191 15-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,053.74 ONMA POOLs0506636 18-Feb-2003 271.15 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb.2D03 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48.44 GNMA POOL 80438057 18-Feb-2003 192.48 36207PTN9 6,000%05/1 52 028 DO 051011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.0D 10-Marv2003 16:15:25 EnCWIW Wwkkwh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 54 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,453.14 GNMA POOL#0457814 18-Feb-2003 328.00 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,109.02 GNMA POOL#0465546 18-Feb-2003 3,817.35 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028 DO 08/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,427.09 GNMA POOL#0465555 18-Feb-2003 3,784.48 36209AE49 6.000%09/1 512 0 2 8 DO 09/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55.27 GNMA POOL#0467279 18-1`eb-2003 167.15 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2029 DO 10/011 01-F6-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39,626.54 GNMA POOL#0467286 18-Feb-2003 3,309.42 36209CCX2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 101011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56.98 GNMA POOL#0468330 18-Feb-2003 161.62 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 953.64 GNMA POOL#0468339 18-Feb-2003 3,368.55 36209DHQO 6.000%0 811 5/2 0 2 8 DO 08/011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-2003 16:15:25 &ecat/VP Wo kboxh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAC£: ^55 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003 -28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,694.95 GNMA POOLM0469688 18-Feb-2003 149.03 36209EXRB 6.0001A 11/15/2029 DO 11/011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 113,821.02 FHLMC GROUP BG5-0476 18-Feb-2003 663.96 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/0V2003 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 18-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,114.96 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH I8-Feb-2003 1,766.39 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-Feb-2003 0.00 IT I8-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS MTN 19-Feb-2003 4,912.50 31331NW59 6.550%08/19/2003 DO 08/19/9 19-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,279.76 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 19-Feb-2001 14,279.76 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO II/DI/9 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 GMACNTS 19-Feb-2003 15,190,12 370425QV5 VAR RT 08/182003 DO 09/17, 19-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 19-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN 0 3R 00459 19-Feb-2003 3,898.50 073928VC4 FLTG RT 12/012003 DO 08/17/ 19-Feb 2003 0.00 IT 19-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-1003 16.13:25 &eeudw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: 56 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODR BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 20-Feb-2003 2,493.75 63743DPL9 0220/2003 20-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,477.62 GNMA 11 POOL 00003109 20-Feb-2003 885.06 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DD 07/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 62,403.37 GNMA 11 POOL 00003152 20-Feb-2003 4,343.23 36202DQD6 7.500%1020/2031 DO 10/011 01-Fcb-2003 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,889.40 GNMA II POOL#0080023 20-Feb-2003 1,896.68 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 12101/9 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,747.80 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 20-Feb-2003 2,618.71 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,063.77 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 20-Feb-2003 1,676.76 36225CNM4 VAR FIT 04202030 DO 04/01/ 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 119,120.75 GNMA II POOL M080408X 20-Feb-2003 15,133.53 36225CN28 6.500%0520/2030 DD 051011 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2003 0.00 10-Mar-1003 16:15:15 &e liw Hbrkbewlf Q M at-Sam leellon Tru Re ort PAGE. •57 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 20-Feb-2003 24.161.66 8124000W6 6.5409/602/20IM3 DD 0220/ 20-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 21-Feb-2003 466.49 3136FOYW6 VAR RT 02/2l/2003DD0821/ 21-Feb-2003 0.00 1T 21-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 640,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS SYST 21-Feb-2003 1,416.00 313384CD9 MAT02212003 21-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 21-Feb-2003 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,808,000.00 MERCK R CO INC DISC 24-Feb-2003 2,151.52 58933SPQ5 0224/2003 24-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,000.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 24-Feb-2003 5,792.04 3133TCE95 VAR RT W152032 DO 12/01/ 01-Jan-2003 0.00 IT 24-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 153,978.54 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Feb-2003 9,216.85 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 25-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 680.69 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 095 25-Feb-2003 2,425.70 39810AAE4 7.430%061012003 DD 022910 01-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 25-Feb-2003 0.00 /0-Mm 2003 16:15:25 Fie iw Wwkbem6 QMellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 58 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2003-28-FEB-2003 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DOS 28-Feb-2003 25,000.00 3133MDGE7 5.000%02282003 DO 02/28/0 28-Feb-2003 0.00 IT 28-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION MDEX 28-Feb-2003 -13,395.00 9128274YS 3.875%01/15/2009 DO 011151 0.00 CW 28-Feb-2003 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Feb-2003 -55,890.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 01/151 0.00 CW 28-Peb-2003 0.00 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Dare TOBd.o(Du. 03/"103 03/26/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR03-16 14(m Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Juanita Skillman, CRM Records Manager SUBJECT: UPDATE OF THE DISTRICT RECORDS MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution 03-06, Adopting Policies and Procedures for the District's Records Management Program, Records Retention, and Destruction of Obsolete Records, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 02-02. SUMMARY The District's Records Management Program, has been updated to better serve the operational needs of the District. This update will incorporate the Policy on Release and Reproduction of District Records into the Records Management Procedure Manual. It also adds two record series to the retention schedule: Series 245 — Public Comment Files, and Series 246 — IT Backup Tapes. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District's Records Management Program is a dynamic document and the attachment reflects proposed additions and/or changes in BOLD/ITALICS. These changes have been worked out and reviewed with and approved by General Counsel's office. C:Docwiwbud SMMgF`paMLLad SRMSTFrryorvy Imemel FbsWLKlFEVbm t<�CI PerpJCMvbgenen h,c w.lra: v,ose Page 1 r ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Proposed Resolution c:mr. u.ms.mow'ow.uoa s.m�ynr.,+w�ry I.ra..wuc>F 110)r+ewas ua,vo.m+i ooc Page 2 ` RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 03-06 y ADOPTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR DISTRICTS RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, RECORDS RETENTION AND DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE RECORDS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR DISTRICT'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, RECORDS RETENTION, AND DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE RECORDS, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-02 WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to maintain a Records Management Program ("Program") that provides for the identification, access, and protection of all records generated or received by the District; and WHEREAS, said Program ensures that all District records are created, received, maintained, and destroyed in a cost-effective manner, in accordance with operating requirements for District business and applicable statutes and regulations; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District is authorized, by the provisions of California Government Code Sections 60200 through 60204, inclusive to destroy records under certain conditions; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and appropriate to authorize the destruction of records on a routine basis that have been retained for a certain period of time, that are copies of originals on file with the District, or that have been preserved in conformance with all applicable statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: Adoption of Policy and Establishment of Program. The Board of Directors of District hereby adopts an addition to Section 300 of the Records Management Procedure Manual, set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: Adoption of Records Retention Schedule. The Board of Directors of District hereby adopts changes to the Records Retention Schedule, set forth on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: Authorization for Destruction of Records. The destruction of certain records, papers, and documents is hereby authorized, pursuant to California Government Code Sections 60200 at seq., after such records have been retained for the minimum time set forth on the Records Retention Schedule. c�" " 9en,pcV"V"uucm Sertrq¢�iam�,arv,memm mnwupF[vrem,ael.Aao,asmavyemax.eoc ate: &fro Page 3 Section 4: Destruction of Records After Preservation. Any record not expressly required by law to be filed and preserved, may be destroyed at any time after it is preserved in conformance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 60203. Section 5: Destruction of Duplicates. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 60200, any duplicate record, paper, or document, the original or a permanent photographic copy of which is in the files of any office or Department of the District, may be destroyed after confirmation with the Records Manager that such original or permanent photographic copy remains on file in the District. Section 6: Retention of Records Not Mentioned. All records, papers, and documents not mentioned in this Resolution shall be retained indefinitely. Section 7: Resolution No. OCSD 02-02 is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 26, 2003 Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary Ghq NaVpmmlfNPY1F/J1F]WTQ'WT11D116%mUe Wryg®7yLx "PReOi °"pB' Page 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Precedure 3.0 ---- Page 1 of 2 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Gsued:1117712000 ;PROCEDURE MANUAL Rwislon:I-3/2003 --- - --- Subject Staffing and Responslbilf les 3.1 INTRODUCTION The Records Management Program is a decentralized administrative position. As such, Program activities are carded out by the Records Manager and by District staff in each Division. The Records Manager is responsible for coordinating and managing the Program and Program procedures,and Division staff is responsible for complying with the Program requirements for records in their respective Divisions. In the procedures below,the individual responsible for running the daily operations of the Program is identified as the Records Manager. 3.2 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to describe the roles and responsibilities of the Board Secretary, Records Manager and Division staff. Back to Too 3.3 STAFFING AND RESPONSIBILITIES Responsibility Action Secretary to the Oversee the Program and act as a liaison between Board the Records Manager,the District's Board of Directors, and Legal Counsel. Records Manager Oversee public requests for information.(See Attachment A) caAct as an advisor on all records and information management issues and related projects. Maintain the Records Retention Schedule. Eg Develop and conduct training sessions on appropriate Records Management Program activities. Maintain the Program procedures manual. Coordinate record destruction suspension ("holds") and destruction resumption ("releases")with Legal Counsel,auditors and the Office of Record to ensure that records are available as required. Ca Manage the records retention,transfer and destruction activities of the Program. Conduct a periodic audit of the Program to ensure compliance. Exhibit A Coordinate vital records protection and ensure that V the Vital Records Program supports the Integrated Emergency Response Plan. Manage the Program database and content for the Intranet site. Records Coordinstor ca Review the Division records and the Records Retention Schedule periodically to ensure that the Division is in compliance with the Program. Forward any required changes to the Records Retention Schedule to the Records Manager. �Ensure that records are maintained and protected in compliance with the Program. Coordinate preparation of records for transfer to offsite storage. Coordinate managing pertinent records after receipt of a Records Hold or Records Release. Coordinate records disposition activities, including preparing records destruction authorization notices and obtaining approvals. District Staff caMaintain records in compliance with the Program requirements. Back to Too Exhibit A v POLICY ON RELEASE AND REPRODUCTION OF DISTRICT RECORDS I. STATEMENT OF POLICY AND LAW The California Public Records Act (Government Code §6250 at seq.) (the "CPRA" or "Act') declares that access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person. In furtherance of that policy, the Act mandates, with specified exceptions, that public records are open to inspection at all times during the office hours of state and local agencies. The Act, however, recognizes a number of specific statutory exemptions to the general rule of public disclosure. The Act also authorizes local agencies to adopt procedures for making records available and for recovering the direct costs of duplicating those records. The spirit of the Act, and the policy of the Orange County Sanitation District, is to permit access to disclosable public records in the possession of the District, unless doing so would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or the request calls for the production of records that are exempt from disclosure under the Act. Other records may be kept confidential on a case-by-case basis only after a District determination that the public interest served by non-disclosure clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure. An example of that type of record would be preliminary drafts of agreements prepared to facilitate discussion and/or negotiations, if disclosure prior to final agreement would have an adverse effect on the negotiation process. However, such analysis will usually involve the assistance of General Counsel. In addition, California courts have also recognized that certain records need not be disclosed if disclosure would reveal the public agency's decision-making process in such a way as to discourage candid discussion within the agency, which would thereby undermine the agency's ability to perform its functions. 1 Exhibit A RM Procedure 3.3 II. PROCEDURE A. Release of Requested Documents. Except for routine requests made to the Board Secretary (e.g., agendas and agenda-related materials), all requests for inspection or copies of District records shall be submitted by the employee receiving the request to the Records Manager, who shall then review the request and refer it to the appropriate Department Head for action. The "Public Records Act Request Form" (Attachment 61) is to be completed and returned by the end of the next business day, if possible, otherwise no later than the third business day, unless a longer time is approved by the Records Manager. See, Section II.C.) B. Review by General Counsel. If the Records Manager and Department Head believe that employee rights or significant interests of the District could be compromised by the requested disclosure, the Records Manager and Department Head shall discuss the request with General Counsel prior to making such disclosure. C. Timeliness. Although District policy encourages a quicker response, the CPRA requires that the person requesting copies of District records be notified within ten (10) calendar days of the District's determination as to whether the request, in whole or in part, calls for the production of disclosable, non-privileged records that are in the possession of the District. Occasionally, where assistance of General Counsel is appropriate, for example, the full ten (10) calendar days may be required in order to make the requisite determination. Under the Act, the District may also be entitled to an additional fourteen (14) calendar d ays i n which to m ake its i nitial determination under the following three (3) circumstances: 1. There is a need to search for and collect the requested documents from other offices, separate from the office processing the request; 2. There is a need to search for, collect, and examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records which are demanded in a single request; or 2 Exhibit A RM Procedure 3.3 4 3. There is a need to consult with another Agency or Department having a substantial interest in the determination of the request. If the additional fourteen (14) calendar days are needed, either the General Counsel or Records Manager must notify the Requestor, in writing, of the reason or reasons for the fourteen (14) day extension and the date on which the determination is expected. A copy of the District's initial notice of determination and/or extension notification shall be provided to the Requestor and to the Board Secretary. If the final determination is to deny a request to inspect or copy District records, the General Counsel and the Records Manager shall notify the Requestor, in writing, of the reasons for the denial. A copy of said letter shall be provided to the Board Secretary. In every i nstance w here the Records M anager d etermines: (1)to not comply with the request; or (2) to take the additional fourteen (14) calendar days to make the initial determination, prior written approval of the District's General Counsel must be obtained at least two (2) working days prior to the date of providing the required notice to the Requestor. D. Partial Disclosure. If portions of the requested record(s) are determined to be exempt from disclosure and those portions are reasonably segregable from the rest of the record(s) by deletion or other means, the non- exempt portion shall be provided to the Requestor. E. Cost of Copies. Under the Act, the District is entitled to be reimbursed by the Requestor for the direct costs of duplication. The District has, however, made a policy determination to not charge the Requestor for the first ten (10) pages. If a Public Records Act request calls for the production of records in excess of ten (10) pages, then the Requestor shall be required to pay ten cents per page for each additional page, which shall be reimbursement of the District's direct costs for duplication. The reimbursement rate shall not include recovery of costs for staff time spent searching for, retrieving, reviewing, evaluating and/or handling of responsive records. 3 Exhibit A RM Procedure 3.3 D At the sole discretion of the District, the District may require the Requestor to submit, in advance, a deposit check based on the estimated direct duplication costs. In the event the District determines that a deposit is required, the Requestor shall be required to submit the deposit prior to District staff commencing any work to locate, identify, and/or obtain responsive records. At the sole discretion of the District, and depending on the estimated number of responsive records, the District may retain the professional reprographic services of a bonded copy service. The Requestor shall be required to reimburse the District for the direct costs of duplication associated with the use of a bonded copying service. In the event the District approves of the use of a bonded copying service, the Requestor may select and retain a bonded copying service; however, such selection shall be subject to the District's approval. The Requestor shall not be permitted direct access, nor be allowed to take possession or custody of District records. The Requestor shall not be allowed to copy District records by any method. F. Cost of Videotapes, Audiotapes, or Compact Discs. The charge to the Requestor for copies of videotapes, audiotapes, or compact disc recordings shall be the District's actual cost of reproduction. G. Media Contacts. Employees are encouraged to refer all media contacts and media inquiries to the Communications Manager. All information requests requiring production of records shall be processed in accordance with the terms of this Policy, and upon completion of the preparation of the copies, shall be delivered to the requesting media representative by the Communications Manager. Department Heads shall report, within one hour, any and all media contacts to the Communications Manager. The Communications Manager shall coordinate any action required by such contact and keep the appropriate Department Head, General Manager, and Board Secretary informed. H. Forms. The "Public Records Act Request Form" shall be used by District staff for purposes of complying with this administrative policy. 4 Exhibit A RM Procedure 3.3 I. Access to Files. No member of the public and no District employee. other than an emplovee of the Department processing records, shall enter any file cabinets or record storage areas or container. except when authorized and accompanied by an authorized Department employee. J. Removal of Records. The unauthorized removal of any record of the District is a violation of California Government Code Section 6201, and is punishable by imprisonment, or fine, or both. K. Litigation Documents. The charge for all copies of any District document or record produced pursuant to a subpoena or request for production of documents issued by a Court or an authorized administrative or regulatory agency or tribunal, shall be twenty-five ($.25) cents per page to reimburse the District for its costs of research, retrieval, examination, handling, copying, and certification of the documents. In the event, due to size or volume of the responsive records, special reproduction services are required, the person making the request shall pay the actual charges incurred for either the District's in-house copy service, or an outside copy service. For large records request, the District shall require an advance deposit based on the estimated direct copying costs. Said deposit shall be paid by the Requestor prior to the District commencing any work to obtain and copy the requested records. Litigation document requests shall be handled by the General Counsel and Board Secretary. 5 Exhibit A RM Procedure 3.3 PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST FORM y (The following Section to be completed by the District's Representative receiving a request to Inspect andtor copy District records) Request Made By: Date Request Was Made: Contact Information: Address: Telephone Number: E-Mail Address: Documents Requested: (If request is in writing, attach a copy.) Request Made To: (Give forth to Records Manager Immediately. Records Manager will work with appropriate Department Head or Designated Staff Member.) (This portion of Form to be completed by Department Head within 10 calendar days of date of request) 1. Request Approved? _Yes —No a. If"No", list the name(s) and position(s)of the person(s) responsible for the denial and reasons. Name(s)and Position(s): Reasons(s): 2. Extension of Time Required? _Yes _No a. If"Yes", indicate reason: The request requires searching and collecting records from locations separate from the office processing the request. _ The request requires searching, collecting, and examining of a voluminous amount of separate records. _ The request requires consultation with another Agency or Department having a substantial interest in the matter. b. Expected date of response: (may not exceed 10 calendar days, plus 14 calendar days from original request date). 3. A completed WDV of this Forth given to requesting party on Department Head TLW:pj:O4:152622:e611 3= Orange County Sanitation District October 25,2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 1 of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Indude:Paper,Videotape,Microfilm, Code I Magnetic,D acal etc. Office of Record IDUOUCate Official Citation V H C 100 ABANDONMENTS SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2 D CA GC 60203 0110 101 ACCIDENT RECORDS SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE CL 6 11013 102 ACCOUNTING REPORTS ACCOUNTING 1 2 ❑1111 103 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FILES ACCOUNTING 1 4 01111 104 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FILES ACCOUNTING 1 6 000 105 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 3 000 106 AGENDA REPORTS SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 U 0011 107 AIR QUALITY FILES AIR QUALITY AND SPECIAL PROJECTS 1 5 000 Er 108 ANNEXATION FILES SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 U 000 109 ANNUAL REPORTS, FINANCIAL FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 U 000 110 ANNUAL REPORTS,OPERATIONAL ORIGINATING DIVISION AR 20 CA GC 60203 000 Ill ASSOCIATION FILES ORIGINATING DIVISION SU SU 000 112 AUDIT RECORDS,ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND 5 U 0011 MONITORING 113 AUDIT RECORDS, FINANCIAL FINANCE ADMINISTRATION CL CL+6 000 114 AUDIT RECORDS, INTERNAL ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 3 00❑ RETENTION PERIOD EVENTCode All retention perlads are listed In years(unless othenulse spedfled)and are In addition to the current year. Characteristics AR-Annual Review EX-Expired RE-Revised SU-Superseded V-Vital AU-After Audit U-Life(of Organization,Rant, SA-Sale,Disposition TE-Termination H-Hlsborml CL-Closed,Completed Equipment,etc.) ST-Settlement C-Confidential Imaesfnn)1 evision Date 0303 Orange County Sanitation District October 25, 2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 2 of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Include:Paper,Videotape,Microfilm, Code I Ma neat opycai,etc. Office of Record IDUPlicate Official Citation V H C 115 BANIONGRECORDS ACCOUNTING 1 6 000 116 BIDS,AWARDED PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSE 1 CL+6 1100 117 BIDS,BOARD REVIEW REQUIRED, SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS I CL+6 1100 AWARDED 118 BIDS, BOARD REVIEW REQUIRED, SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS I CL+6 CA GC 60202 000 UNAWARDED 119 BIDS, UNAWARDED PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSE I CL+6 CA GC 60202 000 120 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT RECORDS ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND 1 5 40 CFR 503.17 000 MONITORING x 121 BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE FILES SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 2 0 0❑ s IT 122 BONDS, REVENUE FINANCE ADMINISTRATION EX IX+2 000 123 BUDGET FILES,APPROVED FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 6 111111 124 BUDGET FILES, PRELIMINARY FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 1 000 125 CASH RECEIPTS ACCOUNTING 1 4 000 126 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSE I IX+2 0011 127 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE,BOARD SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 IX+2 21111 APPROVED CONTRACTS RETENTION PERIOD EVENT Code All retention periods are listed In years(unless otherwim specified)and are In addition to the current year. Characteristics AR-Annual Review EX-Expired RE-Revised SU-Superseded V-Vital AU-After Audit U-Ufe(of Organitadon,Plant, SA-Sale,Disposition TE-Termination H-Historical CL-Closed,Completed EAulpment,etc) ST-Settlement C-Confidential Irpaagaal Revision Date 0303 r Orange County Sanitation District October 25,2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 3 or 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Include:Pacer,Videotape,Mloofllm, Code magnetic,Optical,etc. Office of Record Du lirate Official Citation V H C 128 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDS, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES LAB 1 10 0 0 0 LABORATORY 129 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDS,SOURCE SOURCE CONTROL CL CL+3 111311 CONTROL 130 CHECK REGISTERS ACCOUNTING 1 3 000 131 CHECK REQUESTS ACCOUNTING 1 4 000 132 CHECKS, CANCELLED ACCOUNTING 1 3 000 133 CHECKS,COPIES ACCOUNTING 1 3 000 x 134 CHEMICAL INVENTORY RECORDS ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 2 000 x c rp 135 CLAIM FILES RISK MANAGEMENT 1 CL+6 000 136 COMPLAINT FILES AIR QUALITY AND SPECIAL PROJECTS 1 2 DOO 137 COMPLIANCE RECORDS ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND 1 5 000 MONITORING 138 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE FILES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1 2 000 ADMINISTRATION 139 COMPUTER SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1 2 000 RECORDS ADMINISTRATION 140 CONFINED SPACE RECORDS SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 1 3 8 OCR 5156-5159 0 00 RETENTION PERIOD EVENTGode All retention periods arc listed In Years(unless otherwise specified)and are in addition m the current Veer. Characteristics AR-Annual ReMew Dt-bored RE-Revised SU-Superseded V-Vial AU-After Audit U-Life(of OrgaNxafion,Nano SA-Sale,DispoSIEon TE-Termination H-HnOMiol CL-Oosed,Completed Equipment etc.) ST-Settlement imuaslasll C-Confidential RevisionData 030 Orange County Sanitation District October 25, 2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 4 of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Include:Paper,Videotape,Microfilm, Code Magnetic,Optical,etc. I Office of Record IDUP11cate Official Citation V HI 141 CONFLICT OF INTEREST FILINGS SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 4 4 CA EC 17000,CA GC 1111 0 81009(e) 142 CONTRACTS AGREEMENTS PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSE E% EX+6 000 143 CONTRACTS/AGREEMENTS,BOARD SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 EX+6 ®013 APPROVAL REQUIRED 144 CRANE INSPECTION RECORDS ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 SU 8 OCR 5022(d),8 CCR 5031 000 145 DEFERRED COMPENSATION RECORDS ACCOUNTING 1 5 000 146 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY RECORDS ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 10 0011 147 DELIVERY RECEIPTS PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSE 1 4 13130 m c 148 DRAWINGS,AS BUILT ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION SU SU ®❑❑ a' pp 149 DRAWINGS,BASELINE ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION SU SU 000 150 DRAWINGS, RECORD ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION RE U 000 151 DRAWINGS,SHOP ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION CL U 000 152 EASEMENTS SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 LI 000 153 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS AND HUMAN RESOURCES®EMPLOYEE 1 6 1100 PROGRAMS FILES DEVELOPMENT 154 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION 1 10 000 RETENTION PERIOD EVENT Code All retention periods are listed in years(unless otherwise specified)and are In addition to the current year. Characteristics AR-Annual Review IX-Expired RE-Revised SU-Superseded V-Vital AU-After Audit U-Life(of Organization,Rant, SA-Sale,Dlspondon TE-Termination H-HIS[Odoal CL-Closed,Completed Equipment,etc.) ST-Settlement C-Confidential IMttsfaal Revision Date 0303 d s Orange County Sanitation District Ocwber 25, 2000 Records Retention Schedule Page s of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Include:Paper,Vldealape,Microfilm, Code magnetic,Opticid,etc. Office of Record IDuplicate Official I Citation V HI 155 EOC ACTIVATION RECORDS SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE CL CL+2 200 156 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RECORDS ORIGINATING DIVISION I LI 0 1111 157 EQUIPMENT OWNERSHIP MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 1 LI 0011 158 EXPENSE REPORTS ACCOUNTING 1 6 ❑0❑ 159 FINANCIAL PLANNING RECORDS FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 2 1100 I60 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 10 000 161 FIXED ASSET RECORDS FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 10 1200 m i 162 FLOW RECORDS ORIGINATING DIVISION 2 LI OO❑ 163 FORMATION FILES SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 LI CA GC 4700 ET SEQ 020 164 GENERALLEDGER ACCOUNTING 1 LI 200 165 GRANT RECORDS, UNSUCCESSFUL FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 2 111111 166 GRIEVANCES/COMPLAINTS RECORDS HUMAN RESOURCES&EMPLOYEE CL CL+2 002 DEVELOPMENT 167 HAZARDOUS WASTE RECORDS SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 1 10 40 CFR 122.21 0130 168 HISTORICAL SUB)ECr FILES COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION 1 11 020 169 I-9 FORMS HUMAN RESOURCES&EMPLOYEE TE TE+3 8 USC 1234A 000 DEVELOPMENT RETENTION PERIOD EVENT Code All retention periods are listed in years(unless othenalse sped0ed)and are In addition to the anent year. ChanUerlstia AR-Annual Review EX-Expired RE-Revised SU-Supemede0 V-Vital AU-After Audit U-Life(of Organization,Plant, SA-Sale,Dis"tlon TE-Termination H-Historical 0.-Owed,Completed EQulpment,etc) ST-SettlemeM Imraa(M)1 C-ConfiderMal Revision 3 Orange County Sanitation District October 2S, 2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 6 of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Include;Papa,Videotape,Microfilm, Code Magnetic,Optical,etc. Office of Record IDUplicate Official Citation V H C 170 INCIDENT RECORDS ORIGINATING DIVISION CL 0.+7 29 CFR 1904.2, 29 CFR 000 1904.6 171 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FILES SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 3 TE+30 000 172 INSPECTION RECORDS,CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1 CL+6 000 DAILY PROGRESS 173 INSPECTION RECORDS,CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1 LI 000 SPECIALTY 174 INSPECTION REPORTS, MANHOLE COLLECTION FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1 10 000 175 INSURANCE POLICIES RISK MANAGEMENT EX LI 000 n 176 INVESTMENT RECORDS FINANCE ADMINISTRATION SA SA+6 000 246 ITBACKUP TAPES IN£ORMA TION TECHNOLOGY SS J qo 177 JOB DESCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES a EMPLOYEE CL CL+10 000 DEVELOPMENT 178 JOURNAL ENTRIES ACCOUNTING 1 6 000 179 LABORATORY RECORDS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES LAB 2 10 22 CCR 64815(d) 000 180 LEGISLATION FILES ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND 1 3 000 243 LINE MAINTENANCE FILES COLLECTION FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AR U 181 LITIGATION FILES RISK MANAGEMENT CL CL+6 002 182 LOGS ORIGINATING DIVISION CL+2 CL+2 000 RETENTION PERIOD EVENT Code All retention periods are listed In years(unless otherwise specified)and are In addition to the current year. Characteristics AR-Annual Review EX-EMlintl RE-Revised SI-Superseded v-vital AU-After Audit U-We(of Organization,Plank SA-Sale,Disposition TE-Termination H-Historical CL-Closed,Completed Equipment,etc.) ST-Settlement 1MR0.5 C-Confidential (NpJ Revision Date 0303 Orange County Sanitation District October 25, 2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 7 of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Include:Paper,Vldeolape,Microfilm, Code Magnetic,Optical,etc. I Office of Record IDuplicate Official I Citation V N C 183 LOGS,CONTROL CENTER OPERATIONS- PLANT 1/PLANT 2 CL CL+30 21111 184 MASTER PLANS/STRATEGIC PLANS SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 SU+10 OCSD RES 98-16 000 185 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 1 TE+30 000 186 MEDICAL FILES SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE I TE+30 29 CFR 1910.1001,8 CCR 00 3204 187 MEETING MINUTES,ADMINISTRATIVE ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 2 000 188 MEETING MINUTES, BOARD SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 LI 000 189 MEETING MINUTES, BOARD SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 U 000 x COMMITTEES s m 190 MONTHLY REPORTS ORIGINATING DIVISION AR 2 000 191 OPERATING JOURNALS ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 2 000 192 OPERATING RECORDS ORIGINATING DIVISION AR 5 000 193 OPINIONS SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 U 000 194 ORDINANCES SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS SU U CA H&S 6491.3 000 195 OSHA COMPLIANCE RECORDS SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE SU SU ®00 196 PAYROLL RECORDS ACCOUNTING 1 4 29 CFR 516.5 000 197 PERMITS ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 EX+1 000 RETENTION PERIOD EVENT Code All retention periods are listed In years(unless otherwise specified)and are In addition to the current year. Characteristics AR-Annual Review EX-Expired RE-Revised SU-Superseded V-Vital AU-After Audit U-Ufe(of Organization,Plant, SA-Sale,Disposition TE-Termination H-Historical CL-Owed,Completed Equipment,etc.) ST-Settlement C-Confidentel lRevision IMraRxnll Date3 Orange County Sanitation District October 25, 2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 8 of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Include:Paper,Videotape,Microfilm, Code I Ma neti Optical,etc. Office of Record IDuplicate Official I Citation V H C 198 PERMITS,AQMD AIR QUALITY AND SPECIAL PROJECTS 1 EX ®O 199 PERMITS,BUILDING AND SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS CL LI CA H&S 19850, H&S 4003, 1100 CONSTRUCTION H&S 4004 200 PERMITS, NPDES SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS SU 10 40 CFR 125.301(h) 211 I] 201 PERMITTEES FILES SOURCE CONTROL 1 CL+3 0111:1 202 PERSONNEL FILES HUMAN RESOURCES&EMPLOYEE TE TE+30 29 CFR 1627.3 000 DEVELOPMENT 203 PETTY CASH RECORDS ACCOUNTING 1 4 0011 x 204 POLICIES/PROCEDURES, SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS SU SU+10 020 ADMINISTRATIVE _Q m 205 POLICIES/ PROCEDURES, OPERATIONS MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE SU SU+10 000 AND MAINTENANCE 206 PROJECT FILES ORIGINATING DIVISION CL CL+6 020 207 PROOF OF PUBLICATION,ORDINANCES SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 LI DOO 245 PUBLIC COMMENTFILES COMMUNICA TIONSADMINISTBA TION CL 2 208 PUBLIC RELATIONS RECORDS COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION 1 SU 013 209 PUBLICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION 1 SU El00 210 PURCHASE ORDER FILES PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSE CL CL+6 0011 211 PURCHASE REQUISITION FILES PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSE CL CL+6 1100 RETENTION PERIOD EVENT Code All retention periods are listed in years(unless otherwise speclNed)and are in addition to the current year. Characteristics AR-Annual Review EX-Expired RE-Revisetl SU-Superseded V-Yftl AU-After Audit U-life(of Organization,Plant, SA-Sale,Disposition TE-Termination H-Historical CL-Closed,Completed Equipment,etc) ST-Settlement Dnangnim C-Confidential Revision Date 0303 s Orange County Sanitation District October 25,2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 9 of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Include:Paper,Videotape,Microfilm, Code Magnetic,D awl etc. Office of Record IDuplicate Official Citation V H C 212 RATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECORDS FINANCE ADMINISTRATION I 3 17oo 213 REAL ESTATE RECORDS FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 SU 020 214 RECORDED DOCUMENTS SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 U ®®❑ 215 RECORDS DESTRUCTION CERTIFICATES SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 U 1100 216 RECORDS MANAGEMENT FILES SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 3 000 217 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULES SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 SU+10 1100 218 RECRUITMENT RECORDS HUMAN RESOURCES&EMPLOYEE CL CL+3 29 CFR 1627.3 0011 DEVELOPMENT m 219 REFERENCE FILES ORIGINATING DIVISION SU SU 13110 x 220 REPORTS, FINANCIAL FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 4 000 m 221 REPORTS,GENERAL ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 3 [300 222 REPORTS,TECHNICAL ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 SU 11i711 244 RESEARCH/REFERENCE MATERIALS ORIGINATING DIVISION AR AR 223 RESOLUTIONS, BOARD SECRETARY TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS SU LT go[] 224 RISK MANAGEMENT REPORTS FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1 CL+5 0110 225 SALARY RECORDS HUMAN RESOURCES&EMPLOYEE 1 TE+3 11110 DEVELOPMENT RETENTION PERIOD EVENT Cade All retention periods are listed in years(unless otherwlse sio"Med)and are In addition to the current year. Characteristics AR-Annual Review IX-Expired RE-Revised SU-Superseded V-Vital AU-After Audit U-Life(of Organization,Plant, SA-Sale,Disposition TE-Termination H-Hlstonwl CL-Closed,Completed Equipment.etc) ST-Settlement WARM)] C-Confidentlal e Date 0 Orange County Sanitation District October 25, 2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 10 of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media Induce:Paper,Videotape,Microfilm, Code I Magnetic,D Uol etc. Office of Record IDuplicate Official Citation V H C 226 SECURITY CLEARANCE RECORDS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1 TE+3 000 COMPUTER SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION 227 SEWER LINE RECORDS ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION SU SU 000 228 SOFTWARE APPLICATION FILES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1 LI 000 ADMINISTRATION 229 SPECIFICATIONS ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION 1 LI 000 230 SPEECHES/PRESENTATIONS ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 3 000 231 SUBJECT FILES ORIGINATING DIVISION AR All 000 232 SUBMITTALS, DESIGN ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION SU SU 000 c m 233 TAX RECORDS, EMPLOYEE ACCOUNTING 1 CL+4 29 CFR 516.5 000 234 TAX RECORDS,VENDOR ACCOUNTING 1 CL+6 26 CFR1.6041.1 000 235 TRAINING RECORDS HUMAN RESOURCES&EMPLOYEE CL 3 000 DEVELOPMENT 236 TRAINING RECORDS,SAFETY SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE SU SU 8 CCR 3203 ❑0❑ 237 TRAVEL RECORDS ORIGINATING DIVISION 1 CL+2 000 238 TRIAL BALANCE RECORDS ACCOUNTING 1 3 ❑0❑ RETENTION PERIOD EVENT Code All retention periods are listed In Team(unless otherwise specified)and are In addition to the current year. Chamcteristics AR-Annual Review IX-EXPIred RE-Revised SU-Superseded V-Vlml AU-Amer Audit U-Life(of Organization,Plant SA-Sale,Disposition TE-Tennirmdon H-Hlstudol CL-Closed,Completed Equipment etc.) ST-Settlement C-Confidential IMrAs(ugl Revision Date t703 Orange County Sanitation District October 25, 2000 Records Retention Schedule Page 11 of 11 RECORD SERIES RETENTION Media include:Pacer,Videotape,Microfilm, Code Magnetic,Optical,etc. Office of Record IDupficate Official Citation V H 1C 239 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FILES ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND 1 D 23 CCR 2772 01111 MONITORING 240 WAREHOUSE RECORDS PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSE 1 CL+2 ❑i1❑ 241 WASTEHAULER FILES SOURCE CONTROL 1 3 ❑110 242 WORK ORDERS ORIGINATING DIVISION CL CL+1 01111 rn x s v m RETENTION PERIOD EVENTCode All retention periods are listed in years(unless otherwise spetlRed)and are In addition W the current year. Characterlstics AR-Annual Review EX-EYpired RE-Revised SU-Superseded V-Vial AU-After Audit LI-Ule(of Organization,Plant, SA-Sale,Osimlion TE-Tezminatlan H-Hismdgl CL-Closed,Completed Equipment,etc) ST-Settlement C-Confidential lRevIMsauMl isio Date 03 3 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date TUBO.Gf DIr. 03/12/03 03/2W03 1 AGENDA REPORT Run Number Item Number FAHR03-IB 14(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract for an additional $500,000, increasing the total authorized amount from $1,000,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for the remainder of FY02/03; and, 2. Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services contract from $1,000,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,750,000 for FY 03/04. SUMMARY The District contracts for temporary services to support both capital and non-capital projects. Temporary staffing has been utilized beyond projected levels for FY 02-03 as a result of an increase in capital improvement projects within the Information Technology (IT) Department. Temporary services charges associated with IT contract Programmers currently working on capital projects for the Technical Services and Engineering Departments through December 31, 2002 were $297,507. This amount equals 30% of FY 02-03 total temporary services charges of $978,415. This charge will create a budget shortfall to the authorized $1,000,000 Temporary Services purchase order (PO). Additionally, temporary staffing funds were reduced during the first half of FY 02/03 by $225,000 due to the District's commitment to the Disinfection Project. As of December 31, 2002, the temporary services allocated to the Disinfection Project reduced the total temporary services budget by 25%. District staff has determined the temporary services support for the Disinfection Project will be ongoing for approximately the next six (6) to nine (9) months. It is anticipated that the total cost to support the Disinfection Project with temporary services for this year will be approximately $450,000, or 50% of the total temporary services blanket PO. The unforeseen expense associated with the Disinfection Project impacted the amount originally budgeted for administrative temporary staffing and will contribute to the premature depletion of the original $1,000,000 authorized by the blanket PO. Based on the IT Department's temporary services contract worker usage in FY 01-02 and the reduction in the Engineering Department's contract labor paid through the Temporary Services PO in FY 02-03, the $1,000,000 blanket PO was anticipated to be adequate to cover the non-capital temporary labor costs, which would remain relatively constant. However, as the IT department increased the number of projects and the Technical Services Department implemented the chlorine residual testing and Page 1 monitoring for the Disinfection Project, it became apparent that the temporary services costs would exceed the forecasted and approved blanket PO amount. As of f December 31, 2002, $732,000 had been spent for temporary labor. IT related capital projects and the Disinfection Project accounted for 52% of this expenditure. Therefore, a deficiency of $500,000 is anticipated based on the additional temporary services costs absorbed by the existing temporary services blanket PO. Aside from the capital projects and Disinfection Project, temporary resources will continue to be required to support Customer and Network Support, Process Control Integration, and administrative services. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Board approved Temporary Employment Services Agenda Report (AR) dated June 26, 1999 estimated a maximum of $1,000,000 per year of expenditures for total temporary employment services for the District, which included capital as well as non- capital related temporary services. Projected costs for FY 02-03, which were provided as information only in the Board approved Temporary Employment Services AR dated May 24, 2002 were $3,870,000. Based on current projections, the District will need an additional $500,000 in temporary employment services for FY 02.03. This projection assumes the continued use of temporary staffing for the IT capital projects. The total amount for FY 02-03 of $1,500,000, or 39% of the projected $3,870,000, will provide for non-capital as well as IT capital related temporary services workers to be utilized during the remainder of FY 02-03. On June 26, 1999, the Board approved a request for$1,000,000 in funding for temporary employment services, which included the IT capital improvement contract staff. Due to the fact that the staff recommendation did not forecast the use of the temporary services blanket PO for capital-related programs, the $1,000,000 did not accurately reflect the needs of the District. Therefore, a request for additional funding was presented to the Board on May 24, 2000 to cover the FY 00-01 deficiency for temporary services supporting the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). It was also intended to provide a forecast for additional funds for the following three years; however, the forecasted funds are subject to approval by the board when the budget for each of those three years is adopted each June. The $297,507 cost of the IT supported capital-related temporary services is paid by the capital project budget. These costs do not impact the cost per million gallons of wastewater treated; however, these costs are booked against the $1,000,000 temporary services budget as a method of ensuring the appropriate use of temporary staffing. Page 2 ALTERNATIVES 1) Do not authorize the increase and suspend the use of temporary services. 2) Hire full time regular employees on Limited Tenn Contracts to support a Division through a peak period. Limited term employees are regular full time employees placed on contracts with a specific end date. These employees, during the duration of their contracts, would be entitled to all benefits and provisions of regular full time employees. CEGA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS Temporary Service Totals FY02/03 (Total temporary services expenditures by agency against the PO through February 2003) Page 3 Summary of Temporary Costs February Totals by Department(Budget) Div. FY0142'•' Jul-02F$23.594,$D 8ep,02 Oct-02 Nov-02 Dec02 Jan43 Feb43 Mar43 Apr43 May-03 Thm 6130 YTD 120 $339.19 $3.078.000 $2,400.13 $810.00 $653.07 $1,053.00 $567.00 $916.00 $10.606.39 230 $0.00 $0.000 $0.00 $396.00 $0.00 $D.00 $85.02 $0.00 $481.02 510 $0.00 $0.000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $315.00 $2,249.44 $1.380.47 $3,944.91 630 $1.586.88 $0.0000 $0.00 E0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.586.88 620 $2.030.00 $2,401.2000 $5,2a9.60 $2,784.m $3.712.00 $4,260.80 $4.116.64 $1.385.28 $27.543.52 630 $5,306.46 $4,079.5075 $4,982.75 $3,358.25 $3,562.50 $5,756.00 $1.452.50 $3,963.25 $35.733.96 030D $0.00 $0.00 $D $23,980.41 $35.915.13 $68.662.61 $47.118.05 $41.256.64 $35.598.92 $276,124.46Go Y4,831.74 $3,300.5663 Y4,214.09 $1,853.11 $3,796.11 $5,786.59 $1.774.80 $2,760.60 $30,090A3 T40 $1,763.18 $899.7100 $0,00 wool 30.00 $0.00 $D.00 $0.00 $2,862.87 700 $13,148.54 $5,792.96 $0.00 $9.0 $4,587.82 $4,490.77 $19,890.84 $0.00 $65007...4417 so $0.00 $000 $0.40 $ 30.00 $0.00 $1.508.00 $1,4 8E211 . 2,98.88E4925 519 69 20 $1,0D88 0201 E593 031.8300 $160 $4. 42.00 $13,718.00 $ .6 $10,289.0 57 $5,871.00 $27,639a0 $12D,684.89 940 1 $0.Wl $31,IM.01 $43,600.001 $63.60.001 $17,940.001 $68.544.001 $72.589,001 $27,748.001 $58,210.00 $383.165.00 Totals $31,292.75 $57.499.13 $89,632.66 $135,121.48 $83,866.11 $166,775.99 $174,40490 $106.519.78 $133,303.17 Total: $978,415.37 630D=Disinfection story Only -FY 2001-02 services not Omely Invoiced and thus applled W the 200243 divisional budgets and CIP's.but not applied against 2002.03 Temporary services P.O. Totals by Agency(P.O.) Agency Jul-02 Aug-02 Sap-02 Oct-02 Nov-02 Dec-02 Jan-03 Feb-03 Mar-03 Apr-03 May-03 Thru 6130 YrD AppleOne $11790.67 $5,947.11 $14.875.00 $7.369,81 $11,130.08 $16,103.64 $3,840.80 $5,128.25 $75,694.34 Sellanlyne $13,746.00 $13,920.00 $17,748.00 $10,788.00 $11.130.00 $25,317.00 $3.480.00 $20.358.00 $116,493.00 Irvine Technology $0.00 $0.00 $25,040A0 $2,800.00 $16.000.00 $12,000.00 $13,360.00 $14.280.00 $83,480.00 Worm $0.00 $23,594.80 $23,980A1 $35,915.13 $68,662.61 $47,118.05 541,256.54 $35.596.92 $276,124.46 Lab Support $4,079.50 $3,272.75 $4,982.75 $3,358.25 $3.562.50 $5,756.00 $1,452.50 $3.963.25 $30,427.50 Protect Partners $5,792.96 $0.00 $9,043.32 $8,5D5.92 $4,587.82 $4,490.77 $19,890.80 $0.00 $52,311.63 Remedy $D.00 $0.00 $0.00 $396.00 $0.00 $315.00 $6.451.10 $2.765.75 $9.927.85 TekSystems $4.642.00 $13.718.00 518,600.00 $10,381.00 $10,289.00 $28,031.84 $5.871.00 $27.639.00 $119,171.84 Vantage Group $17,448.00 $29,680.00 $2D,852.00 $4,352.00 $41,408.00 $35,272.00 $10.908.00 $23.572.00 $183,492.00 Totals $57.499.13 $89.632.66 $136.121.48 $83,866.11 $166,775.99 $174,40,130 $106,519.78 $133,303.11 "FY 02-03 P.O.Total: $947,122.62 FY 01-02 Carry Over: $31,292.75 Total Temp Expenses: $978.415.37 "`Tills amount applied m the FY 02-03$1,000,000 Temporary Services PO. 3/18/2003 DRAFT Y MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT February 10, 2003, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on February 10, 2003. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Phil Anthony, Chairman Brian Donahue Paul Cook Shirley McCracken Larry Kraemer Jr. Brian Brady, Alternate No. 1 Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 3 Paul Walker, Alternate No. 2 Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors: Directors: Paul Brown, Dick Corneille, John Collins Dennis Bilodeau Bruce Chalmers — Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. David Mosher, Abdul Rashidi — Staff: Staff: Montgomery Watson Harza Wendy Sevenandt Joanne Daugherty Annette McCluskey— NCG Porter Novelli Shivaji Deshmukh Dennis MacLain — City of Huntington Beach Counsel: Bill Everest Jeannie Heimberger— City of Fountain Valley Brad Hogin Jill Everhart Peter Wolfson — KDC Systems Jenny Glasser George Martin — City of Anaheim Virginia Grebbien Debra Burris — DDB Engineering, Inc. John Kennedy Iry Pickler - IPA Larry Labrado Bob Finn — Brown & Caldwell Mike Markus Joel Kuperberg — Rutan & Tucker Mehul Patel Lily Pham Laura Thomas Mike Wehner Ron Wildermuth PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Committee Chair Anthony introduced OCWD Director Paul Cook who will fill the vacancy on the Committee as a regular member and announced that OCWD Director Richard Chavez would serve as Alternate No. 3 on the Committee. He also introduced Mr. Joel Kuperberg, Rutan & Tucker, who will serve as OCWD District Counsel, after OCWD Board approval at their next meeting. - 1 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes t February 10,2003 1 ITEMS TOO LATE TO BE AGENDIZED None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Meeting Director Eckenrode stated that last month's minutes should reflect that he could not second his own motion. After discussion it was agreed that the January 13 minutes would be reviewed and corrected. (After staff review it has been determined that Director Kraemer seconded the motion). Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried with Directors Cook and Anderson abstaining, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held January 13, 2003 were approved as corrected. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Bids for the Temporary Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution, Elements I and II Proiect Program Manager Mike Markus reported that the plans and specifications for the Temporary Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution, Elements I and II Project have been finalized and recommended authorization to solicit bids. He noted that upon authorization by this Committee the bid opening would be March 25; contract awarded in April; and this portion of the project online by April 2004. Director Cook expressed his concern about a standby power source for this project. Mr. Markus clarified that the new 66 kV substation will have a dual power supply from two SCE sources. Director Cook also inquired if any equipment would be salvaged, and Mr. Markus responded that the majority of the demolition work will be done later as part of the Advanced Water Treatment Facility contract and that the demolition contractor would be responsible for any salvage. Director Collins requested that staff contact the City of Fountain Valley regarding salvaging equipment during demolition instead of diverting it to landfills so that the City can receive a state recycling credit. (AB 939). After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Donahue, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Committee approved the plans and specifications for the Temporary MicrofiltrationlSite Power Distribution, Elements I and II Project and authorized the OCWD General Manager to solicit bids. - 2 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes j February 10, 2003 3. Authorize Issuance of Request for Proposals (RFP's) for Design Services and Engineering Services During Construction for the GWR System Warehouse Expansion and Workshops Design Manager Bill Everest reported on warehouse and workshop issues and alternatives that have been defined by staff. He recommended that authorization for a request of proposals be given to solicit design and engineering services. Directors Anthony and McCracken questioned the need to evaluate alternatives, and Mr. Everest clarified that alternative concepts have already been evaluated, with the RFP requiring review and confirmation of the proposed site plan footprints. Director Cook requested that alternative warehousefworkshops footprints be presented at the next Committee meeting when the proposals and consultant selection recommendation is made and that this be written into the motion. After discussion, the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Cook, seconded by Director Anthony and carried, authorization was given to issue a Request for Proposals, including alternative footprints, for design and engineering services during construction for the GWR System warehouse expansion and workshops. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 4. Analysis for Liquidated Damages Mr. Markus gave a short presentation and reported that a liquidated damages clause is included in contracts for contractor delays past the completion date just prior to advertisement. 5. Project Schedule and Budget Update Mr. Markus gave a presentation and reported on the summary schedule and budget breakdown for the project. Director Anthony requested that at the following months' meetings two bars showing current actual and projected costs and scheduling be included in the presentation. 6. Status Report Mr. Everest reported on the following: A. Public Hearing for State Department of Health Services (DHS) and Department of Water Resources (DWR) - held on February 4 at OCWD was received favorably. He noted that many of the public concerns focused on the permitting process and the desire to have DHS' recommendations to the Regional Water - 3 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes February 10, 2003 Quality Control Board (RWQCB) incorporated into the final permit, which will be issued by the RWQCB. After discussion the following action was taken, Upon motion made by Director Anthony, seconded Director Eckenrode and carried, recommendation to both Boards that a policy be adopted to support the Regional Water Quality Control Board including Department of Health Services recommendations into the RWQCB final permit. Agendize for March 12 OCWD Board and March 29 OCSD Board. Mr. Everest also reported on the following: B. Grants and Loans Update—the $5 million SWRCB grant should be received in March and the DWR's $30 million grant has passed the technical review and we are awaiting receipt of the Prop 13 master contract. He also reported that SWRCB has instituted higher administration fees from 3% to 10% for their grant. (Including the SAWPA grant). Ms. Grebbien noted that a public hearing would be held, but that the project will still be hit with a 4% increase regardless of the public hearing outcome. C. Public Information and Education Update— Mr. Wildermuth reported that the project has received a letter of support from the Association of Orange County Pharmacists and that perhaps one of their board members should be asked to sit on the project's Technical Review Committee. REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGERS No comments REPORT OF COUNSEL - No comments. DIRECTORS COMMENTS — No comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS — No comments. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, March 10, 2003 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. - 4 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meedng Date To ad.or Dtr. 03/26/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Brian Bingman, Project Manager SUBJECT: TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS, JOB NO. P1-76 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the plans and specifications for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a construction contract to J. R. Filanc Construction Company, Inc. for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, for an amount not to exceed $33,037,000. SUMMARY • Eight bids were received and ranged from $33,037,000 to $42,775,000. • The Engineer's Estimate is $39,145,000. • Staff recommends the Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, be awarded to the lowest responsive bidder, J.R. Filanc Construction Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $33,037,000. • In November 2002, the PDC reviewed the project and the Board of Directors approved the Plans and Specifications and an increase to the construction contract budget to match the Engineer's Estimate of$39,145,00. • The construction contract will begin with the Notice to Proceed sometime in late May or early June 2002, and last for 1000 calendar days. • The project is required to supply secondary effluent to GW R System, therefore it will need to be completed prior to the start up of GWR System in 2007. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the Rehabilitation of Trickling Filters and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, is $50,000,000. Authorization of$33,037,000 for the construction contract, $1,753,000 for construction administration, and $1,764,521 for construction inspection is being requested. An amount of$6,108,000 will be moved from the construction contract budget and into contingency to reflect the difference between the apparent low bid and the previously budgeted amount for construction contract. See attached Budget Information Table for more information. An Addendum to the PSA with Black&Veatch (the designer)to provide construction support services will be brought to the PDC and Board of Directors for approval in May, 2003. wN.. d,o.,e Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 70) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The existing trickling filters and clarifiers at Plant No. 1 have reached the end of their useful lives. Three of the trickling filters and the remaining clarifier were constructed in 1964. The fourth trickling filter was constructed in 1974. Black & Veatch Corporation (B&V) evaluated whether a complete rehabilitation of the existing facility or a new facility was more beneficial to the Orange County Sanitation District. A new facility was recommended at the conclusion of the evaluation and agreed upon by the Board of Directors on December 19, 2001. An addendum was added to B&V's Professional Services Agreement for the design of a new trickling filter facility. The new facility includes the following items: • Two new trickling filters which are 166 feet in diameter and will hold twenty feet of plastic filter media • Two new 175 foot diameter clarifiers • A new Power Building 8 • Two effluent lines, one to the Groundwater Replenishment System and one to the interplant line • Primary effluent design capacity of 30 million gallons per day • Design effluent quality of at least 20 mg/I for both Biochemical Oxygen Demand and Total Suspended Solids ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CECA FINDINGS This project is included in the previously approved 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The 1999 Strategic Plan EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and the Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Bid Summary BEB:sa Gnnt&WAgerMa Draft Repor!Wolnt BoaNs1P7-76 TriMing Filter Rehab 032603.eoc UvIw:VIM Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS JOB NO. P7-76 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED` PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED . ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE_` :EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO bATE(':) Project Development $ 13,000 $ 45.000 S - $ 45,000 $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 53535 127% StudiestPemitfina 1 $ 58000 $ 45,000 1 $ - $ 45.000 $ 41.000 $ 41,0001 $ 50.000 122% r SA $ 1,200,000 $ 4.114,479 $ - $ 4.114.479 $ 4.114.479 $ 4,114,479 $ 3450,000 84% $ 280.000 $ 308,000 $ - $ 308,000 $ 280,000 $ 280.000 $ 230,000 82% n Contract $ 13,100,000 $ 39,145000 $ 6,108,W0 $ 33.037000 $ 33037000 $ 33.037,000 on $ 969.000 $ 1.753000 $ - $ 1.753.000 $ 1.753,000 $ 1,753000 n Inspection $ 528000 15 1,764,521 $ - $ 1,764.521 $ 1.764.521 $ 1.764,521 lContingency 4.852.000 $ 2,825000 $ 6,108,000 $ 8,933,000 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 21,000,000 $ 50.000.000 $ - $ 50.000.000 $ 4,477,479 $ 36,554.521 $ 41,032,000 $ 3.783,535 9% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 21,000,0D0 1 $ 50,000,000 1 $ - $ 50,000,000 1 $ 4.477,479 1 $ 36,554,521 $ 41,032,000 1 $ 3,783,535 9% EDMe:00745449 EDMSIPI-mlAgmda Report PrepaMionlAWMa RepoNA4ende RB rv`Bud9et Talk for M4endum No 1 January 25, 2003 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NO.A BID TA BU LAT 10N TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-76 Engineer's Estimate: $39,145,000 Construction Contract Budget: $39,145,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. J.R. FILANC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. $ 33,037,000 2. KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. $ 34,627,132 3. J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 35,561,675 4. WESTERN SUMMIT CONSTRUCTORS, INC. $ 37,369,000 5. ARB, INC. $ 37,422.410 6. ROBISON CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 37,485,914 7. HENSEL PHELPHS CONSTRUCTION CO. $ 41.087.000 8. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 42.775,000 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to J.R. FILANC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. in the bid amount of$33,037,000 as the lowest and best bid. (OX - David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering C:\FIIeNeMIPXP 1-76 Bid Tab.doe Revised 05119198 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962 2411 o � BID SUMMARY TRICKLING FILTER REHABILITATION AND NEW CLARIFIERS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO.Pt-76 J.R.FIIANC CONSTRUCTION CO.JNC. NIEWIT PACIFIC CO. J.F.SHFA CONSTRUCTION,INC. Item Approx.City Unit TOIL Unit Total Unit Total No. Riga Prim Prim Prim Ride Price 1 1 LUMP Sum E 250,000.00 E - 250,OOD.00 S 275,000.00 E 275,0DO.00 $ 800.001 S 60D.000.00 2 1 jLumpSum S 32.167.000.00 E 32,167,000.00 S 33,736,132.00 E 33,736,1M.00 E 34.111.875.00 S 34,111,675.110 3 1 WMp Sum S 500,000.00 S 500.t100.OD E SCO,011 $ 50D,000.00 It500.000.00 $ 500.00.00 0 4 1 Lum Sum $ 120,00D.00 S 120.000.00 $ 116.000.00 S 116.000.00 S 150,000.00 S 1600DO.00 'Add B)or Delete(-) $ } l J.R FlWIC CONSTRUCTON CO.:NC, NUNPT PACIFIC CO. J.F.SHEA CONSTRUCTION,INC. ESTERN SUMMIT CONSTRUCTORS,INCARB,INC. ROBISON CONSTRUCTION,INC. Item Appou.Oty Unit Total ULI Total Unit TPNI No. Pride Prim Price Price Price Prim 1 1 Lump Sum S 579.000.00 $ 579.000.00 S 100. 00.00 E 100,000AO S 3.050.001)0W $ 3,050.M.00 2 1 Lump SUM $ 36.180,00D.00 $ 36,180,OD0.00 $ 36.11".410.00 E 36.622.410.00 E 33.90Q414.00 E 33.906.414.00 3 1 Lump Sum S SWOOD.00 $ 500.".00 $ 500,000.00 E S00,000.00 E S00000.00 $ 5110.000.00 4 t Lum Sum E 110,000,00 $ 110.000.00 $ 200.000.00 S 20D,000.00 S 29,5DO.00 S 29,50C.00 'Add $ WESTERNW"ITWNSTRUCTORS,INC, MB,INC. ROBISON CONSTRUCTI N,INC. HENSEL PHEUM SCONSTRUCTION.W. MARGATE CONSTRUCRON.INC. loon Approx.Oly - Unit Total Unit TOIL No. Prim Prim Price Prim 1 1 Lump Sum E 3011.000.00 S 300,000.01) S 1.500.000.00 E 1,500,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum S 40.177.000.00 E 40,177,000.00 E 40,600,000.00 $ 40,600,000.00 3 1 Lump Sum $ 5000000.00 S 500,000.00 S 500,000.00 E 500,00il 4 1 Lump Sum $ 110.000.00 $ 110,000.00 S 175,000.00 S 175.000.00 'Add(+)or Delete(-) 5 HENSEL PHELPHS CONSTROCTiGH CO. MARGATE WIN imucor He C%F,rN,IW NJ49 SO S,—"R09]N-0 1 225/2003 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mwbn0 Dare ru Bd.or ob. 03/16/03 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: Drain System for North Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-56 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve plans and specifications for Drain System for North Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-56, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4) Award a construction contract to Ken Thompson, Inc., for Drain System for North Pacific Coast Highway Farce Main, Contract No. 5-56, for an amount not to exceed $133,050. SUMMARY • This project, located in the City of Newport Beach, will provide a drain to the North Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-56, replace two 36"valves in the force main, and replace an existing manual bleed valve with an automatic air release valve. • Sealed bids were received on February 25, 2003. Summary information on the 5-56 budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget: $159,091.00 Construction Budget: $ 140,000.00 Engineers Estimate: $155,000.00 Low Responsive Bid: $133,050.00 High Bid: $239,870.00 Number of Bids: 5 • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to Ken Thompson, Inc., for an amount not to exceed $133,050. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$133,050 for the construction contract is being requested. This authorization is within the Facilities Engineering Projects - Collections budget. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for more information. G I d'.1. .MB.,d AgeMa.,.M Q003 B...e Fgeme R.W...WM 17Canlncl s56.dx R—ld " d9a Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ( Fv 2002/03:section e, Page 55 ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This contract will enable the Orange County Sanitation Districts to isolate portions of the North Pacific Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-56, to allow access for corrosion inspections and future maintenance in those sections of the force main. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is not included in a previously approved Master Plan/EIR. The project is part of the Collections Facilities Engineering Projects and is categorically exempt per CEQA Guideline Sections 15301(b) Class 1 and 15302(c) Class 2. The Notice of Exemption was filed on March 10, 2003 with the County of Orange. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Bid Summary TH:lc:sa G:WglobaRAgentla Draft Rep tWolnl Boardsl5-55AR032603-1)irectly to BoaniAoc G:«cau+W�] ERpmN am�s30N emra AO �_�„� Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE FACILITY ENGINEERING - COLLECTIONS FE - COLLECT s � xy Pro'ect Develo ment $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30000 $ 30000 $ 30000 $ 4,000 13% Studies/Permittin $ 61000 $ 61000 It 61000 It 36000 $ 36,000 $ 7,000 19% Desi n $ 740,000 $ 740,000 It 740 000 -- $ 740 000 $ 740,000 $ 99,434 13% Desi n Contract $ 1.500.000 $ 1 500,000 It 1.500.000 $ 126.220 ` $ 126.220 $ 78.631 62% Construction Contract $ 2,489,000 $ 2,489 000 $ 2.489.000 $ 240,351 $ 133.060 S 373,401 $ 132.000 35% Construction Administration $ 210,000 $ 210.000 $ 210 000 $ 210,000 ` $ 210,000 $ 13,000 6% Construction Inspection $ 120,000 $ 120 000 : It 120 000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 10,000 8% Contingency $ 250000 $ 250000 $ 250000 ; � $ - PROJECTTOTAL $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 1 $ - $ 6,400,000 D $ 1,502,571 $ 133,050 S 1,635.621 $ 344,065 21% �t« Reimbursable Costsr ' f1., PROJECT NET $ 5,400.000 $ 5,400,000 $ -" $ 5,400,000 e $ 1,502,571 ,• F� 3,OOY:. $ 1,635,621 $ 344,065 21% EDW January 25, 2003 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NO.:1 BID TABULATION DRAIN SYSTEM FOR NORTH PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (PCH) FORCE MAIN CONTRACT NO. 5-56 Engineer's Estimate: $ 155.000 Construction Contract Budget $ 140,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. KEN THOMPSON, INC. $ 133,050 2. PAULUS ENGINEERING, INC. $ 185.000 3. VALVERDE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 191,000 4. GCI CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 220,500 5. ATLAS ALLIED, INC. $ 239,870 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to KEN THOMPSON, INC, in the bid amount of$133,050 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering c?Deeomenls and sertlngatmVeraa%mal SaNngsa mporary Imemel FIIes10LKDl l&S5 Bid Tab.eoe Revbecl M19M OCSD . P.O.So 8127 . Fmcdain Valley,CA 92rA.Bt27 . (714) 992-2411 810 SUMMARY DRAIN SYSTEM FOR NORTH PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (PCH) FORCE MAIN CONTRACT NO. 5-56 KEN THOMPSON.INC. PAULUS ENGINEERING,INC. VALVERDE CONSTRUCTION,INC. Item Approx.Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Pace Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 30.000.00 $ 30,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 113,050.00 $ 113,060.00 $ 131.000.00 $ 131.000.00 $ 181,000.00 $ 161,000.00 183,050A0. $ 175,000.00; It 191,ODO:OD Add(+�Gr Delete(-� $ $ 9,000.00 � :k;4a 3e 133,050.60 $ 106,000;00' $. 19i009 go KEN THOMPSON,INC. PAULUS ENGINEERING,INC. VALVERDE CONSTRUCTION,INC. Oct CONSTRUCTION,INC. ATLASALLIED,INC. JAMISON ENGINEERING CONTRCTORS,INC. Item Approx.Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Pace Price Pace Pace Price Pace 1 1 Lump Sum $ 66.000.00 $ 56,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 NOBID NO BID 2 1 Lump Sum $ 164,500.00 $ 164.500.00 $ 214.870.00 $ 214,870.00 $ $00p S 220,600.60 $ 23,9;876.06 $ •Add(+(or Delete(-) $ - 4 "flji 220,500.00 $. 239,870.00. $ GCICONSTRUCTION,INC. ATLASd UED,INC. JAMISON ENGINEERING CONTRCTORS,INC. EDMS 003745543 1 Of 1 315/2003 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NeebngDate I To3se.orar. 2;W AGENDA REPORT item Number item Number 18 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Larry Rein, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer& Pump Station Abandonment, Contract No. 2-24-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a license agreement with SWEPI LP to authorize entrance on SWEPI LP's property for design and environmental study purposes related to Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer& Pump Station Abandonment, Contract No. 2-24-1, at not cost to the District, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer& Pump Station Abandonment, Contract No. 2-24-1, will replace a wastewater pump station with a gravity sewer. The existing wastewater pump station needs rehabilitation and is inadequate to handle future flows due to pending land development. Replacing the pump station with a sewer rather than improving it, will save capital costs and operation and maintenance costs. • The gravity sewer is proposed to be constructed in property that SWEPI LP owns and operates through its operating agent, Aera Energy LLC. • The Orange County Sanitation District's (District) consultant, RBF Consulting, will need to enter SWEPI LP property for design purposes. Geotechnical boring will be done as well as environmental and land surveys. • SWEPI LP is willing to allow RBF Consulting to enter property provided District enters into an access agreement with SWEPI LP. The access agreement will require RBF Consulting to furnish proof of insurance to SWEPI LP, indemnify SWEPI LP for District and consultant actions, and allow SWEPI LP to participate in the preparation of and obtain copies of all reports generated by the surveys. • District staff and legal counsel are working with SWEPI LP to achieve an acceptable access license. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The agreement will not have any effect on the project cost. SWEPI LP is proposing a no cost license. See attached budget information table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 2002-03, Section 8, Page 13: Capital Improvement Program, Collections Facilities, Carbon Canyon Sewer and Pump Station Abandonment, Contract No. 2-24-1) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RBF Consulting is proposing focused biological surveys that include surveying the SWEPI LP property. These biological surveys are dependent upon bird nesting seasons. The surveys need to begin this spring and extend through this summer. If the access license agreement is delayed, the project could be delayed by one year due to the delay in the focused biological surveys. Therefore, this agreement is being presented directly to the Board of Directors now. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. The Design Consultant is providing additional CEQA analysis and a Supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration will be prepared as needed. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table LR:sa:jo:sa GMlglobalWgenoa Draft Repoft Joint BoarosWR 2-24-1Aem Access Agreemenl.00c Rix :anon, Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE CARBON CANYON DAM SEWER AND PUMP STATION ABANDONMENT CONTRACT NO. 2-24-1 , ORIGINAL CURRENT PRO,OOSED ��PROPOS6 a ' P.UNOS TNI$ PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROneVTA$k -AUTHORIZED PROJECT? ' 4ubbm REVISI:`b+ 1 AUTHORIZEDc 'AUTHORIZATION, TOTAL EXPENDITURE , 00ENDE& �SUDGET' . BUDGET . INC EASE BUDGET ' • " TO DATE; REOUE91`.1." AUTHOi1IZAT10N TO DATE tb'bATEj6Z)' Project Development $ 3400 $ 12,000 $ 12.000 $ 11.035 $ 11,035 $ 11,035 100% StudieslPemiftin $ 5.000 $ 5.000 $ 5,000 , $ 5.000 $ 2,615 52% r t PSA $ 50.000 $ 286.000 $ 286,000 $ 285,656 $ 285,656 $ 110,000 39% af $ 280300 $ 335,000 $ 335000 $ 335,000 $ 335000 $ 117,000 35% on Contract $ 1.505.100 $ 2.200,000 $ 2 200 000 onon $ 110000 $ 171000 $ 171,000 on $ 234.400 $ 211000 $ 211,000 Contingency $ 436,000 $ 364,000 $ 364,000 PROJECTTOTAL $ 2,619,800 $ 3.584,000 $ 3,584,000 $ 636,691 1 $ 636,691 1 $ 240,650 1 38% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 2,619,800 1 $ 3,584,000 1 $ 3,584.000 $ 636,691 1 $ 636.691 1 $ 240.650 1 381 EDMS ID 003746538 File Folder 2003-03 Fo.Ra wd Od.4,2000 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Tod.oroo-. 3 103 AGENDA REPORT tram Number Item Number 19 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Angie Anderson, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR CONTRACT NOS. 11-28, 5-52; AND 5-49 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Actions regarding approval of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for Rehabilitation of Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49: 1) Verbal report by Staff; 2) Receive and file Final IS/MND, prepared by Environmental Science Associates dated January 23, 2003; 3) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-07, Making Certain Findings Relating to Less Than Significant Environmental Effects Identified in the IS/MND for the Rehabilitation of Edinger Pump Station, Contract No. 11-28; Rehabilitation of A Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52; and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station; Contract No. 5- 49; Approving Mitigation Measures and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; Adopting the Final IS/MND; and Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. SUMMARY • The Edinger and Bitter Point Pump Stations were identified in the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR)for capacity improvements. However, subsequent engineering assessment found that Edinger and Bitter Point Pump stations would require more extensive rehabilitation and/or replacement than previously identified. Moreover, the rehabilitation/replacement of A Street Pump Station was not identified by the PEIR. • The Edinger Pump Station will require a below-grade structure to house new electrical and control equipment. The Bitter Point Pump Station will be replaced with a newly constructed above-grade pump station of increased capacity and installation of an onsite chemical dosing facility. The A Street Pump Station will require construction of a new station on an adjacent vacant lot, owned by the District. An IS/MND has been prepared to provide environmental review of the pump station ftx :d,ona Page 1 r s •r projects as currently proposed in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. • To address the environmental impacts and mitigation measures for the Rehabilitation of Edinger and A Street Pump Stations, and Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station, Environmental Science Associates (ESA), Orange County Sanitation District's (District) environmental consultant, has prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). • The IS/MND was mailed to public agencies and other entities or individuals known to have an interest in the project. The IS/MND was circulated for a 30-day public review period, January 24, 2003 through February 24, 2003; the comment period closed February 24, 2003. • An information item on the IS/MND for these projects (Figures 1-12)were presented at the March 6, 2003 Planning, Design and Construction Committee meeting. • As of this writing, District staff has received eleven comment letters on the IS/MND. Copies of the comment letters are included in the attachments to this Agenda Report. The Sierra Club and Newport Shores Home Association have expressed concern regarding the adequacy of the IS/MND in addressing the potential environmental impacts from the Bitter Point Pump Station. • The Sierra Club is requesting that a more detailed Environmental Impact Report be prepared to address: 1) potential impacts from an accidental spill of hydrogen peroxide and/or magnesium hydroxide on local wildlife and land adjacent to existing wetland; 2) potential impacts from property acquisition; small portion of site conflicts with ongoing efforts to establish an open space and wildlife preserve/park that encompass the entire Banning Ranch area; 3) need for 40 mgd pump station, if the residential and commercial component of the Banning Ranch development is not completed. The proposed chemical storage facility was covered by a Supplemental Environmental Report Impact Report, prepared for the Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program (OCP) and certified by the Board of Directors in December, 2002. The proposed chemical facility at the Bitter Point site provides for a double walled tank and a concrete walled containment area to prevent any chemicals from running off site. Moreover, the pump station capacity is not significantly impacted by the proposed Banning Ranch development. The pump station has been sized primarily to accommodate upstream flows from Rocky Point, Bay Bridge and Lido Pump Stations. The Bitter Point Pump Station would be constructed to the proposed size with or without the Banning Ranch development. • Everette Phillips of Newport Shores has expressed similar concerns regarding potential flooding and spills from chemicals associated with the ft. WW arose Page 2 0 v Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program (OCP) portion of this Project to nearby wetland and storm canal. Additionally, Everette Phillips has provided recommendations for a "good neighbor policy" of adopting the nearby wetland and enhancing the area between Bitter Point and Newport Shores; (i.e. adding tidal gates in the river to reduce the restriction of tidal flow potentially posed by a separate District pipeline project or planting additional trees and landscape along District's Plant No. 2, to improve the view from Newport Shores). Although, the wetland recommendations are noteworthy, they are outside the jurisdiction of the District and not directly related to this project. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Miscellaneous & Support Projects, Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR, Section 8 - Page 162) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The source of funding for preparation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is from Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J-40-5, for a total contract amount of$194,000 to Environmental Science Associates. Of the total contract amount, $80,000 is to be charged to various collections system projects, including Edinger, Bitter Point and A Street Pump Stations. A breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for the pump station projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Edinger Pump Station: The existing Edinger Pump Station is located beneath the westbound lanes of Edinger Avenue, east of the intersection of Edinger Avenue and Graham Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. The area to the south of the station is principally residential. The Westminster Flood Control Channel is located immediately north. Marina High School and Marina Park are opposite the channel. The area to the north and west of Graham consists of industrial properties. The proposed project will increase the station's current capacity of 2.75 million gallons per day (mgd), to its year 2020 master planned capacity of 5.0 mgd. The proposed project will rehabilitate the existing pump station and will construct a second below-grade structure adjacent to the existing pump station to house new electrical and control equipment. � .: VIM Page 3 P Work will be sequenced so service to the surrounding residences and businesses is not interrupted. A Street Pump Station: The existing A Street Pump Station is located beneath Balboa Boulevard at A Street, on the Balboa Peninsula in the City of Newport Beach. The area surrounding the station consists of residential properties and small retail establishments. The City's Peninsula Park and Balboa Pier are located one block away. The peninsula is surrounded by Newport Bay and the Pacific Ocean. The proposed station would be constructed on a 3700 square foot lot owned by the Orange County Sanitation District (District), located at 810 East Balboa Boulevard, on the northwest comer of Balboa Boulevard and A Street. The lot is currently occupied by a vacant restaurant that will be demolished to make room for the new station. The new station would replace the existing station and provide for: • Construction of a below-grade wet well/pump room to house pumps matching the existing station's pumping capacity. • Construction an above-grade electrical control building (approximately 15-feet by 33-feet and 20-feet tall), housing electrical and controls situated above the new pump room. • An architectural design of the electrical and control building with the surrounding setting, including an 8-foot tower atop the building similar to that of adjacent buildings. • Onsite District parking and service area; and electrical control building will encompass half the vacant lot area. • Public (City of Newport Beach) parking and landscaping on the remaining portion of the vacant lot; entrance to the new station and public parking would be from the alley along the north edge of the property, opposite and parallel to Balboa Boulevard. • Extension of upstream gravity sewers from the existing station to the new station and installation of new force mains to connect to the existing downstream force mains; the work will require trenching in Balboa Boulevard, the alley and within the boundaries of the lot. The existing A Street Pump Station would be abandoned upon startup of the new pump station. Bitter Point Pump Station: The existing Bitter Point Pump Station is located beneath the entrance from Pacific Coast Highway (PCH)to the Armstrong Petroleum oil field. The oil field and open space are located in an unincorporated portion of Orange County within the boundaries of the City of Newport Beach. The oil field is bounded by a storm drain and canal to the west, open space to the north and east, and PCH to the south. Small retail establishments and residential properties lay west of the storm drain. Residential properties lay south of PCH. w : •,ate Page 4 9 District staff proposes to purchase property from Armstrong Petroleum Corporation, at al, for a new 40-mgd pump station to replace the existing (5-mgd) Bitter Point Pump Station. The lot would be approximately 40 feet by 240 feet along PCH, immediately west of the existing station. The entrance to the new station would be off the entrance to the oil field. The exit would be located at the west end of the new station's site and traverse directly onto PCH. The existing pump station would be abandoned upon startup of the new pump station. The new proposed pump station would consist of: • A below-grade wet well/ pump room • An above-grade electrical control building (approximately 80-feet by 16-feet and 20-feet tall). • Replacement of an existing six-foot wall. The new wall will consist of several overlapping shorter walls varying in height (maximum height of 20-feet), length and depth to provide a three-dimension look for shielding the building. The new wall will occupy the same area as the existing wall situated within a Caltrans' 10-foot easement bordering PCH. • Native vegetation appropriate to the coastal area; taller trees will be placed behind the wall to further shield the pump station and oil field from sight. • A 4000-gallon, double-walled, enclosed chemical storage tank and dosing facility. The tank will store hydrogen peroxide or magnesium hydroxide to counter pipe corrosion and sewer odors. The tank (approximately 8-feet in diameter by 16-feet tall) and unloading station will be situated all within a secondary containment area of the pump station site. Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts of installing the chemical storage tank and facilities have been identified in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Effluent Pump Station Annex and Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program (SEIR EPSA-OCP), certified by the District in December 2002; mitigation measures contained in the SEIR EPSA-OCP that are applicable to this project will be implemented. • Extension of upstream sewers and downstream force mains to and from the existing station's current site; connections/extensions will be in the vicinity of the existing pump station and may extend into Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). Sanitary services to surrounding residences and businesses shall be maintained throughout construction of the new pump station. As part of this work existing utilities serving the area will be rerouted/upgraded to accommodate the new pump station. The oil field operations and property owners' development offices in the vicinity may experience brief electrical power interruptions during Southern California Edison's transfer of power from existing overhead lines and transformers to the newly installed underground power lines and at grade transformers (storage capacity of the upstream sewage collection system is capable of handling the brief power outages to the existing pump station). Brief interruptions to potable water supply and gas production will also occur. Brief utility interruptions are anticipated to be no more than one half to two hours long. Utility coordination with these entities will be made to arrange the brief interruptions. q W: wl� Page 5 0 ALTERNATIVES Provide short-term rehabilitation to Edinger, Bitter Point, and A Street Pump Stations. This alternative would be costly and will provide minimal benefit to Orange County Sanitation District facilities and would not address future flows or potential spills. CEQA FINDINGS An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration indicates that there are only a few potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Rehabilitation/Replacement of the Pump Station Projects. Mitigation measures have been proposed to minimize identified potential environmental impacts to a less than significant level. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was also prepared to implement the mitigation measures. ATTACHMENTS 1. Figures 1-12 2. Resolution No. OCSD 03-07 3. Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program - Attachment A 3. Comment Letters —Attachment B AA:sa G:NtglobaNAgenda Draft RepMSVoint BoardsV40--5 AR for Edinger A St and Bitter Point 032603.dw �i . a109e Page 6 _ PROJECT SITE LOCATION J r \1a h16n �_.:� area .•_'—_ ,-r,J .� -J Yellw Pullin en i,�� U." �� \ Pranfie __ hl Bwna y �L• LM1 � Alwhalm r i•V.•r s— S Vow - i _....Lamm. ♦N aW�- L. , ^may Z \-�i• CAY � J Z+� ,'\ e Nash� R PUMP STATION Nm. I"L(fDINDE P °"O ..� x � Yoaet L,r aaenr Recla�ati"fPlant N. E�f� I` -n V �,' Y' � '�%! t •Z �1 n/tlunmin Vage mm�nyrm A STREET PUMP STATION IIMna �/ Treatnent Plant No. _ ...•jam. HuMingfen Beach • J L�®_,.` Omvavavraulava �—\��' ,• N�aehn � :�,/ Fa4NM ITa.M�A wa.n 8R1ER POINT PUMP STATION � � o e Paaijie Ocean sauRCE Ea'ummmY Stivmpozivm OfSD Prony 5}anon h"es Ox/10//68 a Figure I OCSD Service Area }`l}(� � —I AY MpQyy W 3E87 � �° sPuu _ _. EI A _ 3 z 3 CDR_ rRR� Gfl ,qi} � 4 • c _ It-,- D1RSj z 3 I iASMANOR - OM@LE55➢�_ Mt _ Nf 11Y 0J� Nbtl Ol p1 zf 4uwgr�yTl 3 999J CI L vn ,wrw I Nr obis OR d E DpgpERQLL x Svc m _ SYpMY O Rye $ _._1 DR r d SEE d0 CHIC F fY ni s�55 f�G E N mumnRa CIIAHt 3 1 zwRrRml s ss04 � senn xw _ E55 --11ii j I sw s1 RFo[OAOI i 1 r�urtWauW I m � �� 3 3 1 mom � xJ AVpOXMI �� sPRY D'IrWqFUPtt g6 � 1 uwumm _DPh4VDOpR Pn i'¢w n i ou IIxID)W II M 3 _ PROJECT SITE 3 3LDPM b wulwm lid p�R(A. J RESEARCH ssu4 Mot a- -p - p RfB a o55 SEE C Bea-w,. S:uiT DIl R� �- g xopgR.-DR 3 pr+ais. W. l 1 SEE C Be NIO GI�IOkN Op MARMA m c MW m �y m S F RAiVp r SPAR94_W q1. S RM F HS i OYgLIST E W v SKYLARK OR a i m PnINAFA _— A NE .L' E' estD u j nw souu slw .xrrN awn loFl xp®fR wm 6 j gOpp�V QR _ _ CASTLE OR RE WFo LwGn Cx z HENaDCILREN MANGRIM j 0 _ -W°7jVEL°YF r^Iz3 R pR pIN1R j QS OR - nlrt 1IIm v'J'� A. AvfF_0°_'- pq pR QIERYL_ • 3 1 LRI{FA WSIIEAp_MI SOFT ND UII M5 *n1 MIXUFi q i Ml0 s '�j 1' Z I �_ 1 - jMu 3 pp _ _�_ rrr�YYA�i LARK R_RI g 3 ILrj:_ xrFCl[0 DR 8 x 1 EiLENNOX p RHAPSODY OR DRI _ _ _ _. 554Y r y P IRppE.�R yrypqu 'm DA OPFRFI rq MI so� Lj MU r � a DR 'i'�r- S! 71c7i AR 3 = 3�3 - SCENARIO OR _ cxmx- tltl j VENrIIRI_-. UR C a -- `� u G x S "z CI R - I FODFf10XY�I I_ , aL_ MIA FO%i _ D d 2JuElOR - w ee {I+ I ° qqd SSD0 m ES ` 6000 �rysm� _ �6MA111 m 1 wA $t ' ' `•moJj _ �YNW PMR 1 L clw cd+w T a - j YxiAR z z � M DIM V W m ERA w T Q p_Ra OID.MM�__ mew mlly y m � � m GM yt .11x4�_ _ s 8f00 3 la 4NNCIu lir,vnwnrtnbl4vna Aurc,vn _ Figure 2 Edinger Pump Station Location D6D P�anp S�mim Neg Dec;'01IR1• srnncEo �rs.mu�mam..WA Figure 3 View of existing Edinger Pump Station NI ND Bo MEWVORf V .9C Y<NIart Iplfl iP� �� tQ pEA li BALBBA UisiV-Iw Be MIIS N a o 5y V r VFRtl, _ yy Bar $ r + qa-.,« .L,ifm I . 1...NY 'n NEWPORT BEACH %% r}NB - Beta uRRsenrx caavtm OUR GUJU aE ' a 2 uInNLL WegO ! , flT BAY oT mien '- . smRB.x.B IN 14 G r B~ _ I I ��LB w I . Ia Qwwrpr: Oy � Oq W eR eA*a w�� -74 F • Nv \ GCFAN € EAGM �, c '+lta _ _ SANTA MAIN. 1, E PROJECT SITE R E _:. AV e 1 S RUBOAPER VIEW PACIFIC OCEAN rAR. 1 1 ocsn 1'emP.9mm,r rv<Anrc;aortas r BuuACF:cmtrm...r s<m�A.nai.r<. Figure 4 A Street Pump Station Location b� L� mYl: o■ all, u ■o.. PUMP STATION ACCESS ���Olen9.faenY sarvwwnD w OCSDPump5lalim N,Dx1201IME Figure 5 View of existing A Street Pump Station a r, i, 11 0 rn p s pill c Paz I��i � lla p f5+ Fa NEWPARK sPxxvanmx a b n g,3yT a nw.awn sx aJW Mtn a s U S dos i u.nxrw� a W I ~TM Q9 '. gAux� Ue ea e. � s munxwx \\ .onU �0 •':y 1` SU NSET ET Z SEE AP ..v*DDDox$ANIA LN ANA. wy 1 Ny a e..°Asiax � ry °SWIfA1IW 1 R a r`u`uw°wnm i \ W g _.!Le uun w N IEb1rNEM a..vnxw uw f viAxr i \ e� Fi _W 18TH S tip J�a\ ■ gi ry w yyy� w y� nLd yha " <ad, PROJECT SITE g frloos_ e SANIA pHAMERF'yt n �Y w�"'i1- o _ NEDII LtBHtNBMW � otl h N4lYiA° el PACIFIC OCEAN ".d SOURCE;E.W.n rld Sdaw.A.DU. a'•SD Ponyi Saalon Neg Figure gure7 F 7 Bitter Point Pump Station Location `_ t. SDVRC6 Qa{t CaMY SwmIm DlMn 0CSDPnPnPStmlm NM Dr ,2011W§ Figure 8 View of existing Bitter Point wall looking east i K •.weµ., ' • SDDRCE 0.np Caunysviiuiian u.mn - - — -DCSDPMWP im Ngneclmllms Figure 9 View of existing Bitter Point Pump Station looking west RELOCATED r PINE TREES WELL WELL 810 WELL p11 GATE /�'OALTRANS f EASEMENT .� H PROPOSED ILLSIDE PUMP STATION EXISTING PUMP STATION .L LINE OF EASEMEN11 PACIFIC COAST HIGHW AY OCSU Pump Station Nt,1m120110a Figure 10 Proposed Bitter Point Pump Station Site Plan OIL 1� xy SOIMCE:L«•an lm. - -- — OCSD Pump SYollmi Nea Orc/1SI16J • Figure 11 Proposed A Street Pump Station Electrical Control Building and Landscaping k I f ELEIn UN FAPN.Vp1i 1.A11 n14uV1AV -� ORAWE cvwnr$ANIIANCN rISiNlri BITTER POIN T PUMP S I A LION NEWPORT BEACH - ------------- -- — WSD Pomp Smuun Nq Drc!10116S $OURCL lu h Ro,Irc. Figure 12 Proposed Bitter Point Wall and Landscaping RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 03-07 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR REHABILITATION OF THE EDINGER PUMP STATION, REHABILITATION OF THE A STREET PUMP STATION,AND REPLACEMENT OF THE BITTER POINT PUMP STATION; APPROVING MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; ADOPTING THE FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR REHABILITATION OF THE EDINGER PUMP STATION, REHABILITATION OF THE A STREET PUMP STATION, AND REPLACEMENT OF THE BITTER POINT PUMP STATION; AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECTS; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD or District)is presently considering the adoption of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Rehabilitation of the A Street Pump Station, and Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, ("Projects"); and WHEREAS, the Edinger Pump Station is located in the City of Huntington Beach and will require rehabilitation and construction of a new below-grade structure. And, A Street and Bitter Point Pump Stations, located in the City of Newport Beach will require construction of two, above-grade pump stations at new locations to replace the existing structures; and WHEREAS, District is the Lead Agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Projects, which are consistent with the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report and the Supplemental Environment Impact Report for the Effluent Pump Station Annex and Collection System Odor Control Program, dated November 2002, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA Guidelines, and District's CEQA procedures; and, WHEREAS, to assess the Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Rehabilitation of the A Street Pump Station, and Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station environmental impacts objectively, District prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration to assess the potentially-significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures, if any, and alternatives associated with the Projects; and, 1 WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines 15070, District staff determined that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration resulted in a determination that there were only less than significant impacts associated with the proposed Projects if certain mitigation measures were implemented, therefore an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared; and, WHEREAS, District has consulted with other public agencies and the general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, as required by CEQA; and, WHEREAS, District has objectively evaluated, received, and filed comments from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, either in full or in summary, to significant environmental concerns raised in the review, have been included in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, District staff presented to the Board the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and commitment to, the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Rehabilitation of the A Street Pump Station, and Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station; and, WHEREAS, District has prepared a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, designed to ensure that the approved mitigation measures are implemented during the Projects' design, construction, and operation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: That changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed Projects, before the proposed Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review, which avoid or mitigate significant environmental effects or substantially lessen the significant effects of the pump station "Projects" identified in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 2: That there is no substantial evidence that the "Projects"will have a significant impact on the environment. 2 Section 3: That the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the District's independent judgment and analysis. Section 4: That the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the District's decision is based are located at the Orange County Sanitation District, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, 92708. The Custodian of these documents and other materials is the Board Secretary. Section 5: That the Board of Directors adopts the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 6: The District will implement the mitigation measures recommended in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration to reduce the significant impacts of the project to a less than significant level. Section 7: The Board of Directors approves the mitigation measures, and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as described in Attachment A to ensure that all mitigation measures are implemented, and; Section 8: The Board authorizes and directs the Board Secretary to file the Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the District's CEQA Procedures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 26, 2003. CHAIR ATTEST: BOARD SECRETARY G:kw .dlaladmin\BS\Resolutions\2003W3-07.Final Study-Ml0gated Negative Dec.doc 3 ATTACHMENTA- M/TIGATIONAND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHAB.OF EDINGER AND AST PUMP STATIONSAND REPLACEMENT OFB/TTER POINT PUMP STATION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE REHABILITATION OF THE EDINGER PUMP STATION The proposed project consists of rehabilitation of the existing pump station,which involves constmcton of a new electrical/controls vault and replacement/modification of the existing pumps,piping,and electrical panels,and installation of a new pump. The proposed project,without mitigation,could create a number of potentially significaut environmental effects that have been identified in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration,and have been taken into account in selecting the best methods for achieving the project's objectives with minimal environmental impacts. AIR OUALITYMITIGATIONMEASURES Air Quality-1:Construction equipment will be shut off to reduce idling when not in direct use. Diesel engines,motors,or equipment shall be located as far away as possible from existing residential areas. Air Quality-2:Stationary and mobile equipment shall be placed as far from residential areas as possible within the temporary construction easement and new station site. Air Quality-3:The contractor shall notify residences within 300 feet of each construction site by posting notices along those streets of planned construction activities at least one week before the start of construction. Marina High School shall also be notified by letter at least two weeks prior to the start of construction. The notifications shall include a planned schedule and contact information. A-1 aad.owsaa,rs AvxfYe. ATTACHMENTA-MITIGATIONAND MONITOMNG PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER ANDA ST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OFBnTER POINT PUMP STATION IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Maintain records of site inspection and OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications communications(i.e.public concerns,public notice nailing lists)for administrative record CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURES Cultural Resources-1: In the event historical or prehistorical cultural resources are discovered during excavation activities,all work in that area shall cease until a qualified archaeologist examines the resources and provides recommendations for further assessment of the site including collection and curation tasks. Cultural Resources-2:In the event paleontological resources are discovered during excavation activities,all work in that area shall cease until a qualified paleontologist examines the resources and provides recommendations for further assessment of the site including collection and curation tasks. Cultural Resources-3:In the event of accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains,the Orange County Coroner would be notified immediately and construction activities shall be halted. If the remains are found to be Native American,the Native American Heritage Commission would be notified within 24 hours. Guidelines of the Native American Heritage Commission shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications contract specifications A-2 a.;mm..l Mat.A..W. ATTACHMENTA-MITIGATIGNAND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITAT/ON OF EDINGER AND AST PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERMLSMITIGATIONMEASORES Hazards and Hazardous Materials-1:All asbestos-containing building materials and lead-based paint will be removed and disposed of by a licensed abatement contractor in the rnanner required by law prior to demolition of the building. A California Certified Asbestos Consultant(CAC)will perform abatement air monitoring during the removal process and certify that all materials have been removed. Hazards and Hazardous Materials-2:If contaminated soils are encountered during excavation,construction activities will stop. The Regional Water Quality Control Board will be immediately notified. Excavation,disposal of excavated soils,dewatering,and backfilling will occur in compliance with hazardous waste management regulations,under the supervision of the Regional Water Quality Control Board,Department of Toxic Substance Control,and County Health Care Agency as appropriate. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with the approved OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications construction contract specifications NOISE MITIGA TION MEASURES Noise-1:Construction activities shall be performed in accordance with District and applicable City of Huntington noise standards. Noise-2:All construction equipment,stationary and mobile,shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffling devices. Noise-3:Communication with to local residents shall be maintained during construction including keeping them informed of the schedule,duration,and progress of the construction to minimize public concerns regarding noise levels. A-3 �w�amn,ai sun,ttAso<�am ATTACHMENTA-MITIWIONAND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND A Sr.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINTPUMP STATION IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Maintain record of construction oversight for OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications administrative record Maintain record of communication with local residents TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURES Traf c-1:A traffic control plan will be prepared for the project. The plan will assign delivery truck routes,incorporate truck parking restrictions,and develop notification requirements to local businesses,emergency service providers,and public transportation(i.e.bus,bicycle,etc.)providers. Furthermore,dirt haul trucks and construction deliveries shall avoid peak miffic periods(7:00—9:00 am)and(4:00—6:00 pm)to the extent feasible. Traffic-2:After construction hours end each day,trenching,and excavation would be covered with steel plates and construction vehicles removed from the street to restore parking. Traffic-3:Short-term construction impacts and closures to locally designated trails and bikeways shall be mitigated with detours,signage,flagmen and reconstruction as appropriate. Regional riding and hiking hails and bikeways impacted by construction shall be restored to their original condition after project construction. A-4 �,.;A�mmtri xiaue n,wciva ATTACHMENTA-MTGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM MND FOR REHABILITATIONOF EDINGER ANDA ST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contact Monitor compliance with construction OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications contract specifications Maintain record of traffic control plan, pennits,and inspection ofpm and post- construction site Review and approve Caltrans pemut application A-5 Fn,,..,n....,,.. 4,M.....»...» ATTACHMENTA-M/T/GATIONAND MONITORING PROGRAM,MNO FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND AST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENTOF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE REHABILITATION OF THE A STREET PUMP STATION The proposed project consists of replacement of the existing pump station,which involves demolition on an existing restaurant located on-site,construction of a new wet well/pump room,electrical control building,new force main,and extension of the existing upstream gravity sewer. The existing station will be decommissioned upon startup. The proposed project,without mitigation,could create a number of potentially significant environmental effects that have been identified in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration,and have been taken into account in selecting the best methods for achieving the project's objectives with minimal env ounmental impacts. AESTHETICS MITIGATION MEASURES Aesthetics-1:The architectural design and landscaping of the new A Street above grade facilities(electrical control building,landscaping,etc.)shall integrate with the surrounding area and comply with the City of Newport Beach's redevelopment plans. Aesthetics-2:Exterior lights for A Street pump station will be directed downward and oriented to ensure that no light source will be directly visible from any neighboring residential areas. Motion sensors will control the lights when the station is unmanned. The new lights would not conflict with surrounding land uses, nor add substantial light or glare to the area. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in design/construction contract Monitor compliance with design/construction OCSD Prior to final design and during specifications connactspecifications. Maintxinrecurd of construction communiceton and pre and post-construction conditions for administrative record. A-6 e�w,o�nmui sdM�.nawci.m ATTACHMENT A-MITIGA710NAND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND AST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION AIR OUALITYMITIGATION MEASURES Air Quality-l:Construction equipment will be shut off to reduce idling when not in direct use. Diesel engines,motors,or equipment shall be located as far away as possible from existing residential areas. Air Quality-2:Stationary and mobile equipment shall be placed as far from residential areas as possible within the temporary construction easement and new station site. Air Quality-3:The contractor shall notify residences within 300 feet of each construction site by posting notices along those streets of planned construction activities at least one week before the start of construction. The notifications shall include a planned schedule and contact information. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Maintain record of site inspection and OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications communications(i.e.public concema,public notice mailing lists) for administrative record CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURES Cultural Resources-1:In the event historical or pre-historical cultural resources are discovered during excavation activities,all work in that area shall cease until a qualified archaeologist examines the resources and provides recommendations for further assessment of the site including collection and curation asks. Cultural Resources-2: In the event paleontological resources are discovered during excavation activities,all work in that am shall cease until a qualified paleontologist examines the resources and provides recommendations for further assessment of the site including collection and carnation tasks. Cultural Resources-3:In the event of accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains,the Orange County Coroner would be notified immediately and construction activities shall be halted. If the remains are found to be Native American,the Native American Heritage Commission would be notified within 24 hours. Guidelines of the Native American Heritage Commission shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. A-7 u.;��,,,mm sdmu Asmrmur ATTACHMENTA-M/T7GATIONAND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDMGER ANDAST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION Cultural Raources4:Prior to demolition,a Historic Building Survey will be conducted by a qualified architectural historian to determine whether the structure to be demolished on A Street possesses significant historic qualities. The District will implement recommendations of the survey report to ensure that impacts to significant historic resources are avoided. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Conduct Historic Building Survey prior to Monitor compliance with the approved OCSD Prim to and during construction demolition construction contract specifications 2. Include in construction contract specifications HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MITIGATION MEASURES Hazards and Hazardous Materials-I:All asbestos-containing building materials and lead-based paint will be removed and disposed of by a licensed abatement contractor in the manner required by law prior to demolition of the building. A California Certified Asbestos Consultant(CAC)will perform abatement air monitoring during the removal process and certify that all materials have been removed. The demolition of the existing structure at A Street would be done in accordance to Newport Beach's Waste Management Plan. Hazards and Hazardous Materials-2:If contaminated soils are encountered during excavation,construction activities will stop. The Regional Water Quality Control Board will be immediately notified. Excavation,disposal of excavated soils,dewatering,and backfilling will occur in compliance with hazardous waste management regulations,under the supervision of the Regional Water Quality Control Board,Department of Toxic Substance Control,and County Health Care Agency as appropriate. A-8 EaW...1 erlmue Awn . ATTACHMENT A-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM,MAID FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND AST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Conduct inspections for asbestos- Monitor compliance with the approved OCSD Prior to construction containing materials in the building to be construction contract specifications demolished at 810 East Balboa Blvd. Compliance with approved asbestos and lead 2. Prior to demolition, remove all asbestos- paint removal plans.Monitor removal process containing materials from building in and maintain record of inspection for accordance with applicable regulations, administrative record NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES Noise-I:Construction activities shall be performed in accordance with District and applicable City of Newport Beach noise standards. Noise-2:All construction equipment,stationary and mobile,shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffling devices. Noised:Communication with the local residents shall be maintained during construction including keeping them informed of the schedule,duration,and progress of the construction to minimize public concerns regarding noise levels. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 2. Include in construction contract Maintain record of construction oversight and OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications communications(i.e.public concerns,public notice trading lists)for administrative record A-9 En�mnm ui seiena n.meiem ATTACHMENTA-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND AST PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION TRAFFICMITIGATION MEASURES Traffic-1:A traffic control plan will be prepared for the project. The plan will assign delivery truck routes, incorporate truck parking restrictions,and develop notification requirements to local businesses,emergency service providers,and public transportation(i.e.bus,bicycle, etc.)providers. Furthermore,dirt haul trucks and construction deliveries shall avoid peak traffic periods(7:00—9:00 am)and(4:00—6:00 pm)to the extent feasible. Traffic-2:The District shall notify the City of Newport Beach, local residences,and businesses that parking my be impacted at least one week prior to trenching along East Balboa Boulevard. Traffic-3:After construction hours end each day,trenching,and excavation would be covered with steel plates and construction vehicles removed from the street to restore parking. Traffic4:Short-term construction impacts and closures to locally designated trails and bikeways shall be mitigated with detours,signage,flagmen and reconstruction as appropriate. Regional riding and hiking trails and bikeways impacted by construction shall be restored to thew original condition after project construction. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications contract specifications Maintain record of traffic control plan, permits,and inspection of pre and post- construction site Review and approve Caltrans permit application A-10 E.N..m nnl sdmcc A.W., ATTACHMENTA-MIT/GATIONAND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABIUTA770N OF EDINGER AND AST.PUMP STA77ONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BITTER POINT PUMP STATION The proposed project consists of replacement of the existing pump station,which involves construction of anew wet well/pump room,electrical control building, chemical dosing facility,new screening wall,new force main,and extension of the existing upstream gravity sewer. The existing station will be decommissioned upon startup. The proposed project.without mitigation,could create a number of potentially significant environmental effects that have been identified in the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration,and have been taken into account in selecting the best methods for achieving the project's objectives with minimal environmental impacts. AESTHETICS MITIGATION MEASURES Aesthetics-1:The design and landscape of the new Bitter Point above grade facilities(electrical control building,wall,landscaping,etc.)shall meet the City's goal of shielding the oilfield pumping units from sight while enhancing the visual character of the site. The landscaping shall incorporate low water-use plants. Aesthetics-2: Exterior lights for Bitter Point pump station will be directed downward and oriented to ensure that no light source will be directly visible from any neighboring residential areas. Motion sensors will control the lights when the station is unmanned. The new lights would not conflict with surrounding land uses, nor add substantial light or glare to the area. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in design/construction contract Monitor compliance with design/construction OCSD Prior to final design and during specifications contract specifications. Maintain record of construction communication and pre and post-construction conditions for administrative record A-11 EnvlmnmmYl S�immAaaci.lm ATTACHMENTA-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND AST PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION AIR OUALITYMITIGATION MEASURES Air Quality-1:Construction equipment will be shut off to reduce idling when not in direct use. Diesel engines,motors,or equipment shall be located as far away as possible from existing residential areas. Air Quality-2:Stationary and mobile equipment shall be placed as far from residential areas as possible within the temporary construction easement and new station site. Air Quality-3: The contractor shall notify residences within 300 feet of each constmcton site by posting notices along those streets of planned construction activities at least one week before the start of construction. West Newport Oil and Armstrong Petroleum Oilfield shall also be notified by letter at least two weeks prior to the start of construction. The notifications shall include a planned schedule and contact information. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Maintain record of site inspection and OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications maintain record of communications(i.e. public concerns,public notice mailing lists) for administrative record CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGA TION MEASURES Cultural Resources-1:In the event historical or pre-historical cultural resources are discovered during excavation activities,all work in that area shall cease until a qualified archaeologist examines the resources and provides recommendations for further assessment of the site including collection and curation tasks. Cultural Resources-2:In the event paleontological resources are discovered during excavation activities,all work in that area shall cease until a qualified paleontologist examines the resources and provides recommendations for further assessment of the site including collection and cumtion tasks. A-12 aa�mm��ai x�raun.�oi. ATTACHMENTA-MITTG4PONAND MONITORING PROGRAM.MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND AST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION Cultural Resources-3: In the event of accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains,the Orange County Coroner would be notified immediately and construction activities shall be halted. If the remains are found to be Native American,the Native American Heritage Commission would be notified within 24 hours. Guidelines of the Native American Heritage Commission shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD During construction specifications contract specifications GEOLOGY AND SOILS MITIGA TIONMEASURES Geology and Soils-1:Chemical storage tanks and appurtenant piping and connections will be designed to withstand ground shaking to avoid potential spills during a seismic event. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in design/construction contract Monitor compliance with design/construction OCSD Prior to approving final design and specifications contract specification construction Maintain record of construction specifications, geotechnical evaluation,soil surveys and construction oversight for administrative record A-13 rawoaarnm soma Asn;.ie ATTACHMENTA-MIT/GATIONAND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND AST PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MITIGATION MEASURES Hazards and Hazardous Materials-1: The District will follow procedures to ensure proper handling and storage of hazardous materials and reduce the potential for spills at the Bitter Point pump station Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program(OCP)chemical storage site. At a minimum,the procedures will include the following: - obtain a permit to store hazardous materials from the local fire department; - provide notification of the chemical storage site location to the Orange County Health Care Agency; - equip chemical delivery trucks with spill cleanup equipment adequate to contain and clean up any solid or liquid spill; - equip chemical storage tanks with adequate secondary containment; - chemical transport contractors will have adequate Spill Prevention Containment and Countermeasure(SPCC)plans in place covering the chemical storage site.The SPCC Plan will cover chemical transfer activities(including Department of Transportation(DOT)requirements),public notification and placarding requirements,secondary containment,emergency spill response actions,routine site access control,and site management and maintenance procedures. The contractor's SPCC Plan would require approval by the District's Safety Division. Hazards and Hazardous Materials-2:The District shall require that all personnel working with hazardous chemicals have health and safety training. This is a legal OSHA requirement under the Worker Right to Know regulations in the Federal Code of Regulations,Title 29. The training shall include,at minimum,the proper use of safety equipment,hazard identifications,and proper handling and disposal of spilled hazardous materials. Hazards and Hazardous Materials-3:Access to OCP chemical storage sites will be controlled to allow access only to authorized personnel. Hazards and Hazardous Materials4l:All asbestos-containing building materials and lead-based paint will be removed and disposed of by a licensed abatement contractor in the manner required by law prior to demolition of the building. A California Certified Asbestos Consultant(CAC)will perform abatement air monitoring during the removal process and certify that all materials have been removed. Hazards and Hazardous Materials-5: If contaminated soils are encountered during excavation,construction activities will stop. The Regional Water Quality Control Based will be immediately notified. Excavation, disposal of excavated soils,dewatering,and backfilling will occur in compliance with hazardous waste A-14 aaamm�sam S�Ieoa Au«i.as ATTACHMENTA-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITA770N OF EDINGER AND AST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION management regulations,under the supervision of the Regional Water Quality Control Board,Deparbnent of Toxic Substance Control,and County Health Caro Agency as appropriate. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in contraction contract Contractors SPCC Plan to be approved by the OCSD Prior to installation/construction specifications District's Safety Division 2. Modify OCSD Spill Prevention Monitor compliance with the approved Containment Countermeasure(SPCC)Plan construction contract specifications,OCSD's Prior to and during installation/ SPCC and approved contractor SPCC Plan. construction 3. Notify Orange County Health Can Agency,I.Obtain permit from fire departments Review final project design,monitor Prior to and during installation/ compliance with the approved construction construction :5.Retain a gcotcchnical consultant to conduct a contract specifications site assessment that will include soil borings to determine whether subsurface contamination exists. Geotechnical consultant shall prepare a Prior to approving final design and site assessment report summarizing findings construction and including recommended actions to be implemented during construction of the pump station to ensure worker safety and to protect the public and environment in compliance with hazardous waste management and hazardous waste site remediation regulations. A-IS anwmnmmui Snima nerovinu A TTACHMENTA-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND AST PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION MINERAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURES Mineral Resources-1:The District will coordinate electrical service interruptions with Amrstrong Petroleum Corporation and West Newport Oil Company to minimize oil and gas production impacts. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY Include in construction contract specifications Coordinate communications with Armstrong OCSD Prior to construction Petroleum Corporation and West Newport Oil Company. Maintain record of coordination efforts. Prior to and during construction NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES Noise-1:Construction activities shall be performed in accordance with District and applicable County of Orange noise standards. Noise-2:All construction equipment,stationary and mobile,shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffling devices. Noise-3: Communication with the local residents shall be maintained during construction including keeping them informed of the schedule,duration,and progress of the construction to minimize public concerns regarding noise levels. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 3. Include in construction contract Maintain records of construction oversight OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications and communications(i.e. public concerns, public notice mailing lists)for administrative record A-16 aaa,oa�.„ui um,«A.mcl.m. ATTACHMENTA-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM,MND FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND A AST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION TRAFFIC MITIGAT/ON MEASURES Traffic-1:A traffic control plan will be prepared for each project. The plan will assign delivery truck routes,incorporate truck parking restrictions,and develop notification requirements to local businesses,emergency service providers,and public transportation(i.e.bus,bicycle,etc.)providers. Furthermore,dirt haul trucks and construction deliveries shall avoid peak traffic periods(7:00—9:00 am)and(4:00—6:00 pm)to the extent feasible. Traffic-2:After construction hours end each day,trenching,and excavation would be covered with steel plates and construction vehicles removed from the street to restore parking. Traffic-3:Short-term construction impacts and closures to locally designated trails and bikeways shall be mitigated with detours,signage,flagmen and reconstruction as appropriate. Regional riding and hiking trails and bikeways impacted by construction shall be restored to their original condition after project construction. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications contract specifications Maintain record of traffic control plan, permits,and inspection of pre and post- construction site Review and approve Caltrans permit application A-17 EnWmnmmiei Rkmcr A.W. ATTACHMENTA-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM,MAD FOR REHABILITATION OF EDINGER AND AST.PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION UTILITIES MITIGATION MEASURES Utilities-1:Utility locations shall be verified through field surveys. Utilities-2:Utility excavation or encroachment permits shall be obtained from the appropriate agencies,which will include measures to minimize utility disruption. Utilities-3:Detailed specifications shall be prepared as part of the design plans to include procedures for the excavation,support,and fill or areas around utility cables and pipes. All affected utility services would be notified of the District's construction plans and schedule. Arrangements shall be made with these entities regarding protection,relocation,or temporary disconnection of services. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications contract specifications Review and approve SCE permit application A-18 Enw=n Aal&ienwA Gall Attachment B. RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Rehabilitation of the Edinger and A Street Pump Stations and Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SUMMARY This document contains responses to the comment letters received during circulation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the Rehabilitation of the Edinger and A Street Pump Stations and Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station. A total of 11 comment letters were received during the public review period, extending from January 24 to February 24, 2003. Copies of the comment letters received on the Draft IS/MND are attached to this document. Comments in each letter have been numbered and bracketed. Written responses to each comment are assigned the same number as the comment. The Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse confirmation letter is included following the roaster list of comments. The State Clearinghouse number for the project is SCH No. 2003011108. Comment Letters Received for the Orange County Sanitation District IS/MND Organization or Author Comments Date I Caltrans District 12 C-1 to C-7 2/25/03 2 City of Anaheim A-1 to A-2 1/30/03 3 County of Orange Harbors, Beaches and Parks COHBP-1 2/6/03 Division 4 County of Orange Planning&Development COPD-1 to COPD-9 2/24/03 Service Department 5 Department of Toxic Substances Control DTSC-1 to DTSC-18 2/6(03 6 Sierra Club SC-1 to SC-2 223/03 7 Southern California Association of Governments SCAG-1 to SCAG-2 215/03 8 Sempm Energy SE-1 to SE-2 213/03 9 Vic Leipzig VL-1 128/03 10 Everette Phillips EP-1 to EP-5 2/10/03,2/11/03 11 Alan Silcock AS-1 2/17/03 T 4/3�W STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor's Office of Planning and Research ` State Clearinghouse 0"Darin Tal Furn y cmv+ or Imcrim Dircclor ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT DATE: January 29,2003 TO: Angie Anderson Orange County Sanitation District - 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley,CA 92708i RE: Rehabilitation of Edinger and A Street Pump Stations and Replaainbo(of the! Bitter Point Pump Station SCH#: 2003011108 This is to acknowledge that the State Clearinghouse has received your environmental document for state review. The review period assigned by the State Clearinghouse is: Review Start Dale: January 2A,2003 Review End Dale: February 24,2003 We have distributed your document to the following agencies and departments: California Coastal Commission Caltrans,District 12 Department of Boating and Waterways Department of Conservation Department of Fish and Game,Region S Department of Parks and Recreation Department of Toxic Substances Control Integrated Waste Management Board Native American Heritage Commission Office of Historic Preservation Public Utilities Commission Regional Water Quality Control Board,Region 8 Resources Agency State Lands Commission The State Clearinghouse will provide a closing letter with any state agency comments to your attention on the date following the close of the review period. Thank you for your participation in the Stale Clearinghouse review process. I<fe'ma nSTREET P.O.00X3 SAIRAMENTO.CALIPORNIA 958:2-3W (916)445 6 FAX1916)123-391R www.Wrsa_Rm «,.wnwee-n a nnvNbementll oeobllebt rnattilal I eaNy peajlet TWe:RehmeOmrm al Ed,&w s""P,G•mM rota mM Reolamenldnre Bntzr Peint P vswY 2993 0111 0 8 leeG gee,¢y; Re-:PNemc591N Ql 5 SbeN AJMHa:1P9JJ E6f Armle %wne:11v _____ ___ _ __ __ __ _ Pmv LLacalb¢ Caney:plMp GlyNvenG Cwnminry:P^�[9 - -- Cmea Hbeela: �eWtl Fu LPCabe.^'49 aw_e1.6^2uJ TC®I AReS' BaR b0e3e Ce.wMm AlatlWiPY J $epian:�Tw � ane:_�Buv. MbJnl Vhi SNNxxyR PaJ&CoY1Hry WGMrge:Padlctlk� .0, ❑ a a BECEI w� deWa:m. ❑eM<m PTia,sLXth.l U ❑FbY4ewe mien ow ❑amm 842p8]O +ea ❑ow ❑w nEw ❑_. .----- ------ -- -- STATECLEV,,,.�E - - _----- LacYPNen TYPe' ❑awtt.l Pero lywe ❑a.,errt Pme Game dglmwPee aaa..Xwa.gmena®e ❑aa,w.P- OFaw dw ❑ww+e..q.. oGn.PoeF,nml ❑Ptli.rta WaUereGynem an.Y.tl oC.nGP.. pclmmwGv nee-- paew® ---_---dumo++.tres.'amGu ®aFeepae� aeWlePmanlrytN: --- ---------- - -- ❑Pa,YeloYc 14eb�ga�� OMM/faKty,: TM aoPYi 8ne�gpC�lydgeel� o*rw..aM' *N. a Gmeew[ aen_gGe—eepGm rl P, dmwG• xn_q®_Eseeea_ ew T cEewubnl Bwr.w.. n— T Fv HnO aro )u FWNtls etas rams `SJAHZgjeo Irgen ------ lee;evxmunNaowrnene mgmoemwua ❑F+ae Fle xwe ^•�.. .�.. � � f Nn LLmiamG UN ❑weG laeaP..wwm ❑smFaay.nw flm mealy mvaueHy m6eekgb/So'nc ®Seam Goutlry dVlXYM11'panan mgnOaaRaGalaAal ❑.. .. dselEm,bacweP.aeXrd.wle dWPtll- ❑Ga,mz.n mxXu ❑wevmn ❑mwao-nw.Y ❑aan.aamwtlbn paaeumr+GwweaNwa mTMbxawrour. ❑lamm�e O ememe/Mv ❑Puwc Yav¢u£WYer mineXGrtuafnn O<uwNu�^EPam ❑Fnea ❑Rmeal--- ❑--- mder ..^- -•- -- Lan-W¢2aNbnl--- Plan- -l- -an:---- - tans Ne'---- 6B----uryIGI'- Fnwe{aeseXYllan:RellaWiNale qe E-In9tt Rnp 5lAYnm W Cny Hunllrybl Hew-laMmniWel ba Mr Mlp WIFnb2tlece Ne C.NgA$Peel Punq AaeulinIM4ry al NenaoX fleaN Gtl Bluer PdrvP ..n..0 Wb wAeaWwm-oange Caunry,rilnin Ine MurMrba of M CYyal Nergon Bea-I.FvxbiWrW inrormalbn,4aa Ma Io anaXea Wtim al lMenl. Saw Clulingauu camxL P jeet Sent la the followtag State Agencim rolelensaHlJ ��P rzmaao sawcawum..s� sum Remw Wgan: H.1c W.wnre COI EPA mirs cmGacaeml CbI�A Cdwmb Rm H- _qRB-giman Pmjua SCH COW 2-.�1 4.2003 _CRbhbwPmmllamn nb Comm _q x-Tm lmwp Natlmw-beaa P mdInpOAWaaaMgmlB- ju b - Fb q _HWB:Cem ivim _HWCB: W w14 xLPvb&l _HWC WORIot —Rrm . am- x Reg.WQCB-_ Ple eBBte Slate clearinglea.Number _eay cwnAlxvcaaw XTmRs hcalcrc (SCHB)an all C-mmeuta _BwR vluAmleamawb: _OHH(Fmigcayern) _Gnsliw scHe: 2003011, 108 el-ra-am xab uawm-en�carom PbufrnNYaeaa®mG N,mITb Ne _Mawuua _Fogy Conwiuion t,eei may pP �1Z Mce �_cGwmn �Publi lllililiet Caron �/j _lYyu%anniq _L Manlo AQNdAPCDIJ' _ xaniaeACem Car �HIW I.in-a Carom— R _fla wttyuve _TeAbe Rgl Pbn ABercy _Qee, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Umbiat 12 333r mchelson Drive,sum 390 Irvure,CA 52s12-9s96 PHONE (o<4))7ea2010 FAX (049)724-2019 rry-(W)7:e-7913 FAX AND AW L February 25.2003 Ms'Ang1e A ld� File: IGR/CEQA Orange County Sanitation Dstrict SCH#:20030111U8 10844 Fibs Avenue Log 1t 119('i Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SR-1 (PCH) Subject: Rehabilitation of the Edinger and A Street Pump Stations, and Replacement of the Bitter poittt Pump Station Initial Study(tS) - Mitigxted Negative Declaration (MND) Dear Ms. Anderson; The,ik you for me opporturtty to review and commend on the project document cited above. The three pump stations described in this document were previously identified for capacity improvements in the Orange County Sanitation District(OOSD) 1999 Strategic Plan Program EiR However,subsequerd assessment found that the stations required raore eMersive rehabilitation than previously identified. This ISIMND proposes to mhablltatelreplace the three pump staoons currently located in the cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. One pump station,the Biter Root Pump Station In Huntington Beach,is located on SR-I, Pacific Coast Highway, and proposes constn=bwc dadvW and drainage work alongside the Cahmns'rigM4f-way boundary. Oaltrans District 12 status would be a responsible agency on this project We have the fdlowirg comments: 1. No drainage,seepage of runoff water or waste of any kind is allowed on State prppery unless written authorrmton has been obtained from'he State. Any water mn-oPF that does drain onto Catrans nghtoRway from construction operations or from the resulting Droject must fully conform to the current discharge requirements of the Regional Water Quality C-1 Control Board to avoid impacting water quality. Measures must be moorporated to contain all vehicle loads and avoid any tracking of materials that may fall or blow onto Calbans' roadways or facilities; 2 All work within the State right-of-way must conform to Caltrans'Standard Plans and Standard specifications for watcr pollution curnrul,induding prepareaon of a Water C-2 Pollution Control Program (WPCP)or Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)as required. See attachment Water Pollution Control Pr(Uyfsidn-[ 3. Please rote that all projects Irivolving soil disturbing activtes should pay extra attention to stnnn water pollution control during the"rainy season-(Octauer 1'—April 30l and follow I C"3 "rd".-'m mobi4rygvml;alr/wnla- • MS. Angie Anoerson February 25, 2003 Page 2 4. lore water pollution Control Best Managament Practices(BMPs) to minimize impact to the J C-3 receiving waters; 5. An Encroachment Permit from Caltrans may be required if any project activities or pined Improvements encroach upon Caltranis right-of-way or Pacific Coast Rghway. To acquire an enChosc mint penniL environmental concerns such as cultural resources, biological C 4 resources, and water quality eonoems must be addressed. Gee the srWt:imterd, Environmental Review Requirements for Encroachment Permfts. Our Traffic Operations Branch has the following sparafto comments regarding the document 6. A copy of the 6.5"xt n" plan sheet OCSD faxed to the Cakrans Troffia Operations Branch is very Preliminary Win 61ad true infortnatlon (some of which appears inaccurate). The Scare is too¢mail and some of the information is Itandwrtiden and not legible. Caltrans TratTic Operations needs a more complete set of plans wills detaiLS and larger scale. vye C16 akn would Ike fo see a FULL cross section at prefmaby more than one location 5lrvwtrg Cancans ri bi way antl easefnents inducting PatlfiC Godst Highway boundartes and all the hmplovements Proposed by OCSD vtdltding the block wall with all Me offsets and dimerelons. huAher,the exad last o of driveways with dimensiwls would need 0o be Identified; 7. Plans should also show the k)CatiOh ot,and any changes to,the`"dil kg underground and overhead utilities(high and low risk)within Calbans easement.any portion of the fight-of- Way mat IS impacted by the OCSD improvement and the driveway location. Plants and C-6 cross sections should also show any Changes to the existing drainage pattern due to(for example)the constroCtion of the block wan end the driveway; a. After receiving the complete set of plans and details as indicated above.we w1l review and Will make necessary cOmmems. Upon receiving those plans, it can be determined who C-7 else or which other CaUrerls branch,0 any,should review the package. Please continue to keep Us informed of this,project and arty future developments that Could ou have co�ntaanWly ct us, p�se do not hesitatec,the State ettooccall Becky 3hu n facilities. lmway at 949)440-4451 ueSdOnS or need to Sincerely. dent F JosPh,Chief Advanced PlaKarxJ tiran7 U � Attae'hments(2) m'. Mr.W attain Gassdy, OGSD RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CALTRANS DISTRICT 12 C-1 The comment states that construction activities would be required to comply with discharge requirements mandated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board to avoid impacts to water quality. Each of the projects would be subject to the District's water quality protection measures for construction activities as described in the District's Strategic Plan Program EIR certified in 1999. The District requires that construction activities encompassing more than one acre prepare Storrs Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) that identify best management practices to avoid discharging water from construction sites. As a standard procedure,the District Compliance Division must first approve each construction contractor's SWPPP prior to commencement of work. These procedures are outlined in the Program EIR and Supplemental EIR certified in 2002. The IS/MND concludes that implementation of the District's standard procedures would minimize impacts to water quality from construction activities. C-2 The comment states that SWPPPs must be prepared prior to construction. See response to comment C-1. C-3 The comment states that during the rainy season (October 1 - April 30), construction contractors should pay close attention to the storm water pollution control and follow the water pollution control best management practices to minimize water quality impacts. See response to comment C-l. C4 The comment notes that an encroachment permit would be required if construction activities affect Caltrans right-of-way including Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). To acquire an encroachment permit environmental concerns such as cultural resources,biological resources and water quality concerns must be addressed. The IS/MND acknowledges that construction of the Bitter Point Pump Station would likely require an encroachment permit from Caltrans. Prior to construction, the District would work with Caltrans in obtaining an encroachment permit that would minimize impacts to traffic along PCH and address any cultural,biological, and water quality concerns. C-5 The comment states that the drawings Caltrans has seen to date are not adequate to obtain an encroachment permit. The District did not send the draft design concept drawings to Caltrans as part of the encroachment permit application, but rather as a preliminary exchange of information. As final designs are prepared,the District will prepare the encroachment permit application in coordination with Caltrans staff. The application will include detailed drawings with the appropriate information needed for Caltrans to assess the project adequately. Construction within Caltrans right-of-way or easement will not occur without an approved encroachment permit from Caltrans. C-6 The comment requests information on the existing overhead and underground utilities. This information will be included in the application for an encroachment permit. See response to comment C-5. C-7 The comment states that they will decide which Caltrans branch will review the designs once the package has been received. See responses to comments C-5 and C-6. CITY OF ANAfiBIM,CALIFORNIA i ...l 1 Planning Department January 30, 2003 Mr. Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 RE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT AN INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE. DECLARATION—REHABILITATION OF THE EDINGER PUMP STATION, A STREET PUMP STATION AND REPLACEMENT OF THE BITTER POINT PUMP STATION Dear Mr. Herberg: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above-referenced document. City staff has reviewed A 1 the document and has no comments at this time. Please forward any subsequent public notices and/or environmental documents regarding this A 2 project to my attention at the address listed below. If you have any questions regarding this response, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 765-5139, Extension 5750. Sincerely, A.t� owseph z righ Associate Plalmer XVYIIOMVVK.WlMmNyngpW,eMyYain Yu V�n4 V N,WMXu emmwtan Ya 200 South Anaheim Boulevard P.O.Box 3222,Anaheim,California 92803 4 (714)766-5139 • %, w.anaheim.net CITY OF ANAHEIM A-1 The comment does not raise an environmental issue. Therefore,no response is necessary. A-2 The District will send the City any subsequent public notices and/or environmental documentation regarding this project. Anderson, Angie From: Cassidy, William Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2003 2:11 PM To: Anderson, Angie Subject: RE: Public Comment on MND Bitter Point PS Angie, I just got off the phone(Thursday February 6,2003, 1:45 PM)with Sherry. She questioned the reasoning behind placing the new wall adjacent to the sidewalk. I explained as follows: 1. The District would be replacing a 6'wall within Caltrans' 10-foot right way. Caltrans build the wall at the City of Newport Beach's request when they last widened PCH. 2. The purpose of the existing wall and trees(behind the wall,was to shield the oil pumps from the street. However, the slow growing trees have failed to reach the 18 to 20 feel require to hide the pumps. 3. The new wail's des'gn would consist of multiple walls of varying heights and offsets from the street,creating a 3-D effect. The various heights and offsets would create elevated landscaped areas. The maximum height would be 20-feet near the center of the wall. Trees that would grow taller than 20 feet would be planted behind the wall to further screen the pumps. 4. The new walls)would be offset from the sidewalk a minimum of 2 feet. The 2 plus feet to be landscaped. 5. The south wall of the pump station would be part of the screeningg wall, The highest point of the wall. 6. Any further offset of the wall from the sidewalk would push the District's new station in an area the oil company needs to keep clear to maintain the'r pump'ng units. The proposed layout allows the oil company to service their wells and the District to service the pump station without getting in each others way. 7. The District's goal is to maintain serviceability and Improve on what the City and Caltrans tried to achieve. William Cassidy ---Original Message---- From: Anderson,Angle Sent:Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:56 AM To: Cassidy,William Subject: Public Comment on MND Bitter Point PS Importance: High William, Today, I received a phone message from Sherry Miller of Harbors, Beaches and Parks(County of Orange)re: "Why do walls need to be so close to PCHT' Please call at(714)834-3137. Please documenf conversation and email me back on: Date and time you returned the call,agency's concern and the outcome of your conversation for the record. Thank you, Angle Anderson COHBP-0 1 COUNTY OF ORANGE HARBORS,BEACHES AND PARKS DMSION COHBP-1 The comment regards the proximity of the proposed Bitter Point Pump Station walls to Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). The District would be replacing the existing six foot wall within the Caltrans ten-foot right-of-way. Caltrans built the wall at the request of the City of Newport Beach at the time PCH was last widened. The purpose of the wall and trees planted behind the wall was to shield the oil pumps at the Armstrong Oilfield from view. However, the slow growing trees have failed to reach the 18 to 20 foot height required to hide the pumps. The design of the new wall consists of multiple walls of varying heights and offsets from PCH, creating a three dimensional effect. The various heights and offsets will create elevated landscaped areas. The south wall of the pump station will be the highest part of the screening wall. The maximum height will be 20 feet near the center of the wall. Trees that will grow taller than 20 feet will be planted behind the wall to further screen the pumps. The new wall will be setback from the sidewalk at a minimum of two feet. This setback area will be landscaped. Any further setback of the wall from the sidewalk would push the District's new pump station into an area that the oil company needs to keep clear for maintenance of their pumping units. The proposed setback and layout would allow both the oil company and the District to service their equipment without interference with the other's operations. The District's goal is to maintain serviceability and enhance previous plans prepared by the City and Caltrans to achieve visual screening of the existing oil field and the District's above-grade electrical panel. ¢ oQ LAARV ILL1 ,4MAli n County of Orange p Planning & Development Services Department s �" ""` ➢°""" °<now 4Mal�p AWACa9' WMn MLti C" tQ�V NCL 03-010 February 24,2003 Jim Huterg do Azipc Anderson Orange County Sanitation Distant 109"Ellis Avcneo Fountain Valley,CA 92709 SABIECr: Mitigated ND for the Rehabilitation of Edinger and A Street Pump Stations and R[plsconeot of the Bitter Penn Pump Stacon Dear Mr.Haberw The above referenced item is a Mitigated Negative Declaration QM )for the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD). The project proposes to rebabilitate both tat Edinger and A Street Pinup Stations and mplaoe the situ point Pump Statiaa The Edinger Pump Station m Hrmtin8lon Beach is located in the 5500 block of Edinger Avemaq and in Newport Beach the A Steel Pump Station is at 810 Bast Balboa Boulevard,and the Bitter Point Popp Station is in the 5000 block of Pacific Coast Highway. The County of Orange has reviewed the MND and offers the following comrnmts: FLOOD 1. The Edinger Pump Station is located uodeaneath the westbound Imes of Edinger Avenue, just east o'the intersection.of Avenue and Graham Avenue,in the City of Htuitingon Seaeb. The Westminster Flood Control Channel(FaeilityNo.C04)is located immediatelynorth of the proposedprgea. Our records show that the Orange County Flood Contol District(OCFCD)owas fee tale far the prop"imrnodiaeclycan CODPA of the intersection of Edinger Avenue and Graham Avenue. Any work within the OCFCD rightof--way will raquire enctoacbment permits Ecru the ODuritys Public, Property Pewits Sadon. For information regarding permit application please contact Doug Witherspoon at(714)834-2366. I CUI.7TJRAvt37STORICA1. 2. The initial study indicated that the project moat is sensitive for paleontological rzsoonss and that work will crave should any fossils be found during grading and wnabnmiou. CODP-2 Amr fossils that may be exposed and salvaged should be prepared "to the point of idortificapon.' 3. In the care of fossils recovered from the site during gtadmWor and roastructiaa.we encourage Orange County Unitatiem District to follow the Board of Supervisors mtsmple CODP-3 in requiring that these ealtwal resources be dotted to a suitable repository"within Orange County.' 4. The project proponent should be prepared to pay"potential cueatim fees'to the Comty m other suitable repository for the long-term curabon and maiateoaace of donated CODP4 collections. 5. The same mitigation language should be used for potential arebaeological resources that may be found during the project grading and consumption. Thus,address preparation b the point of identification,potential euration fees, and donation of artifacts to an COOP-5 institution within the County of Orange. 6. It is—clear in the checklist analysis section for Cultural Resources(V.A p.43)how it was deter ur ed that the A Street Pump Station"don pot retain any qualities that would qualify it as sat historic resource". A Historic Building Survey maybe necessary to both CODP-6 assess the historical significance and to retard arty original resourea prior to demolition. The fact that the 1934 pump station is not cmrrmdy listed does not determine whetbc or not it is eligible for listing. 7. Concerning the significance of impacts to archeological and bistorieal resources, mitigating for those impacts and protecting those resources,California Favireemeaal Quality Aux(CEQA)(§§15064.5/15126.4;15331)provides among other provisions. language that pus lead agencies on notice that,in many circumstances,the very popular method of mitigating impaat5 on historical resources by way of documentation(e.g. CODP-7 historic native,photographs or atchilaxaral drawings)will not mitigate the cffcrs ro a poim wh=clearly oo siga ficaut effect on the environment would oocm. Therefore,the Historic Building Survey may not be adequate mitigation for demolition of the Inatome A Street Pump Station. WASTE MANAGEhIENi.' S. waste Diversion Wben structures such as buildings,surface parking and sidewalks=demolished a,part of the initial site prepmalion phase fora project,dmrolition wastes are gemzted. The CODP-8 proposed project will result to the generation of demolition wastes. Dernolitioto- generated wastes consist of heavy.inert materials such as amctetc,asphalt,rock and 2 soils,wood,drywall,meWs and brick These materials create significant problems when disposed of m landfills;since demolition wastes do not decompose,they rake up vabuWe landfill capacity. Additionally,since demolition wastes are heavy whim compared with paper and plastic,it is more difficult for jurisdictions to reduce the tonnage of disposed waste. For this reason,demolition waste debris has been specifically targeted by the State of California for diversion from the waste stream. Pmjocte that will generate demolition waste should emphasize decom&uction and diversion planning,rather than demolition. Decoaumction is the platmed,organized dismantling of existing buikbngs and structures on a project site,which allows maximum:use of the deconstructed materials for recycling and limits disposal at solid waste landfills. During the construction ofnew projects,construction wastes are gmerated. The proposed lmject,will result in the generation of construction wastes. Construction- CODP-8 generated waste,conmst primarily of inert materials that would otherwise take up valuable landfill space. Reducing constriction wastes at construction sites coaserum landfill space,reduces thu.cavironmental impact of producing new materials,and aw reduce overall building project expenses through avoided purchaWdisposal costs. Wood, drywall,cardboard.metals,brink plastics and shingles can be reeved in other comtructioaprojectsorrecyeled. The project applicant should contact the recycling coordinators for the Citics of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach who can provide the names and locations of rocycling faeilitin in the project areas that will accept corrstruciio:wastes. We recommend that this project address a waste reduction phan for the demolition and constitution wastes generated from this proiect. 9. Asbestos and Soils Conninina Hazardous Mat"Ws Demolition-generated waste from the proposedpmjxt may contain asbestos or soils containing hazardous materials. Tbc project applicant should be aware that the County's solid waste landfills are not permitted to accept asbestos wastes or soils containing h ,a a ous materials. During the consnueduc phase of the proposed project,ifavbestos CODP-9 or soils containing hazardous materials are discovered,those materials must be transported to f=huos that are permitted to accept them. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the MND. If You have anY questions,Dle isc contact Charlotte Harrycran at(714)834-2521 Very truly yours, g Tieely, gcr Envitonmcvtal➢harming Scrvias Division eh t 3 COUNTY OF ORANGE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COPD-1 The comment concerns the need for an encroachment permit for the proposed Edinger pump station project. As indicated on page 19 of the IS/MND, the District will apply for an encroachment permit for all work within the Orange County Flood Control District right-of- way, which is located immediately east of the intersection of Edinger Avenue and Graham Avenue. Encroachment permits will be obtained from the County's Public Property Permits Section. COPD-2 The comment relates to potential paleontological resources that could be found during excavation. Any fossils that may be exposed and salvaged should be prepared "to the point of identification." The mitigation measure on page 43 of the IS/MND describes procedures to be followed if paleontological resources are found. In the event that paleontological resources are unearthed, a qualified paleontologist would survey the site and determine the course of action to ensure that significant impacts would be avoided. This includes identifying and recording the resource, notifying local historic resource centers, and evaluating collection and curation options. COPD-3 The comment encourages the District to donate any fossil resources that are recovered to a suitable repository within Orange County. The IS/MND includes a mitigation measure that requires the District to retain a qualified paleontologist to assess any paleontological discoveries made during excavation activities. The qualified paleontologist would advise the District on the necessary actions depending on the nature of the discovery. This could include curation at the Orange County museum. COPD-4 The comment pertains to the payment of"potential cure[ion fees" to the County or other suitable repository for the long-term curation and maintenance of donated collections. The IS/MND includes a mitigation measure that requires the District to retain a qualified paleontologist to assess any paleontological discoveries during excavation activities. The qualified paleontologist would advise the District on the necessary actions depending on the nature of the discovery. If the unearthed object warrants curation as recommended by the qualified paleontologist, the District would evaluate curation options, including related fees, that would ensure the protection of the resource. COPD-5 The comment raises the same concerns for potential archaeological resources that may be encountered. See response to comment COPD-4. COPD-6 The comment asks for clarification of the determination that the restaurant on the proposed A Street pump station site is not a historic resource and suggests conducting a Historic Building Survey. In response to the comment,a new mitigation measure will be added to the IS/MND: • Prior to demolition, a Historic Building Survey will be conducted by a qualified architectural historian to determine whether the structure to be demolished on A Street possesses significant historic qualities. The District will implement recommendations of the survey report to ensure that impacts to significant historic resources are avoided. The District will comply with recommendations of the Historic Building Survey to avoid impacts to significant historic resources. COPD-7 The comment states that the Historic Building Survey and documentation may not be adequate mitigation for demolition of the building. The District retained an architectural historian to survey the building to be demolished at 810 East Balboa Boulevard in Newport Beach on March 4,2003. The survey concluded the following: ...the building at 810 E. Balboa Boulevard lacks historic architectural integrity,and thus it does not meet criteria for designation as a local/county, state or national historic resource, nor could it be considered as a contributing building to any potential historic district. The Historic Building Survey does not recommend any further action to protect historic resources. Copies of the Historic Building Survey report are available at the District's administrative offices. COPD-8 The comment concerns recycling of demolition and construction wastes, the use of deconstruction and diversion planning, and development of a waste reduction plan. The IS/MND states on pages 66 and 67 that demolition of the restaurant on the proposed site for the A Street Pump Station will comply with the City of Newport Beach Waste Management Plan and equipment will be salvaged prior to demolition. It is the District's policy to encourage recycling where feasible. The construction contractor will be encouraged to salvage equipment from the existing pump stations in conformance with the District's waste minimization policies. COPD-9 The comment concerns proper disposal of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and contaminated soils. The Hazards and Hazardous Materials subsection of the IS/MND acknowledges that a survey of the restaurant on the proposed A Street Pump Station site found asbestos levels requiring abatement procedures to be followed. The IS/MND also acknowledges that contaminated soils could be encountered during excavation. Mitigation measures identified in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials subsection beginning on page 48 of IS/MND provide for proper disposal of hazardous materials in accordance with applicable regulations. ur , Department of Toxic Substances Control Edwin F. Lowry, Director 5796 Corporate Avenue ;. rrp j ne Cypress, California90630 "' S. •3 Agency Winston H.secretHickoary Gray Davis Agency Secretary (�I "�+f, rr Californiaovernoria Environmental I-, `�%fli ��i' .-'�r ;�;'..'-` Protection Agency ' February 6, 2003 Ms. Angie Anderson Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE REHABILITATION OF EDINGER& A PUMP STATIONS AND REPLACEMENT OF THE BITTER POINT PUMP STATION PROJECT (SCH #2003011108) Dear Ms. Thrasher: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has received your Negative Declaration (ND)for the above-mentioned Project. Based on the review of the document, DTSC's comments are as follows: 1) The ND needs to identify and determine whether current or historic uses at the Project site have resulted in any release of hazardous wastes/substances at the DTsc-t Project area. 2) The ND needs to identify any known or potentially contaminated site within the proposed Project area. For all identified sites, the ND needs to evaluate whether DTSC-2 conditions at the site pose a threat to human health or the environment. 3) The ND should identify the mechanism to Initiate any required investigation and/or remediation for any site that may require remediation, and the DTSC-3 government agency to provide appropriate regulatory oversight. 4) An environmental assessment should be conducted in the project areas to evaluate whether the project areas are contaminated with hazardous substances from the potential past and current uses including storage, transport, generation, DTsc-4 and disposal of toxic and hazardous waste/materials. The ND indicates each of the projects would require some excavation that could expose contaminated soils. The energy chellengo racing Caaromis is real. Every Celdnmian needs to lake immediate scum ac reduce energy ronsumptlon. For a list or simple ways you can reduce demand end cut your energy costs,see our We"ite at www.dtsc.ca.gov. 0 Printed on Recycled Paper Ms. Angie Anderson February 6, 2003 Page 2 of 4 5) Any hazardous wastes/materials encountered during construction should be remediated in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Prior to initiating any construction activities, an environmental assessment should be conducted to determine if a release of hazardous wastes/substances exists at the site. If so, further studies should be carried out to delineate the nature and extent of the contamination. Also, it is necessary to estimate the potential threat DTSC-5 to public health and/or the environment posed by the site. It maybe necessary to determine H an expedited response action is required to reduce existing or potential threats to public health or the environment. If no immediate threat exists, the final remedy should be implemented in compliance with state regulations and policies rather than excavation of soil prior to any assessments. 6) All environmental investigation and/or remediation should be conducted under a Workplan which is approved by a regulatory agency that has jurisdiction to DTSC S oversee hazardous waste cleanups. Complete characterization of the soil is needed prior to any excavation or removal action. 7) The ND states that the Marina High School is located approximately one-quarter mile east of the Edinger Pump Station site. Therefore, proper environmental DTSC-7 studies should be conducted to ensure that a threat to childcare children's health and the environment does not exist at the site. 8) If the subject property was previously used for vegetation or agriculture, onsite soils could contain pesticide residues. The site may have contributed to soil, DTSC-e and groundwater contamination. Proper investigation and remedial actions should be conducted at the site prior to its new development. 9) If any of the adjacent properties of the project site are contaminated with hazardous chemicals, and if the proposed project is within 2,000 feet from a contaminated site, then the proposed development may fall under the "Border DTSC-9 Zone of a Contaminated Property." Appropriate precautions should be taken prior to construction if the proposed project is on a "Border Zone Property." 10) The ND states that excavation could encounter soils requiring disposal at a hazardous waste facility. The project construction may require soil excavation and soil filling in certain areas. Appropriate sampling is required prior to disposal of the excavated soil. If the soil is contaminated, properly dispose of it rather DTSC-10 than placing it in another location. Land Disposal Restrictions(LDRs)may be applicable to these soils. Also, R the project is planning to import soil to backfill the areas excavated, proper sampling should be conducted to make sure that Ms. Angie Anderson February 6, 2003 Page 3 of 4 the imported soil is free of contamination. J DTSC-10 11) If the project requires demolition, renovation and addition of building structures, investigate the presence of lead-based paints and asbestos containing materials (AGMs) in the currently existing buildings at the site. If the presence of lead- DTSC-11 based paints or ACMs are suspected, proper precautions should be taken during demolition activities. Additionally,the contaminants should be remediated in compliance with the California environmental regulations. 12) If it is suspected that groundwater contamination currently exists at the site, a groundwater investigation may also be necessary based on the nature of on-site DTSC-12 contaminants and the depth to the groundwater. 13) If it is determined that hazardous wastes are, or will be, generated by the proposed project, the wastes must be managed in accordance with the California Hazardous Waste Control Law(California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, DTSC-13 chapter 6.5)and the Hazardous Waste Control Regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5). 14) If it is determined that hazardous wastes are or will be generated and the wastes are(a)stored in tanks or containers for more than ninety days, (b)treated onsite, or(c)disposed of onsite, then a permit from DTSC may be required. The facility DTSC-14 should contact DTSC at (818) 551-2171 to initiate pre application discussions and determine the permitting process applicable to the facility. 15) If It Is determined that hazardous wastes will be generated, the facility should obtain a United States Environmental Protection Agency Identification Number DTSC-15 by phoning (800)618-6942. 16) Certain hazardous waste treatment processes may require authorization from the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). Information about the requirement for authorization can be obtained by contacting Mr. Jack Miller, DTSC-16 Public Health Services, Environmental Health Services, County of Orange at (714)667-3771. 17) If the proposed project discharge treated waste water to the sewer, a discharge DTSC-17 permit should be obtained from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 18) If during construction the project, soil and/or groundwater contamination are suspected, construction in the area should cease and appropriate Health and DTSC-18 Ms. Angie Anderson February 6, 2003 Page 4 of 4 Safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated soil and/or groundwater exist, the ND should identify how any required investigation DTSC-18 and/or remediation will be conducted, and the government agency to provide appropriate regulatory oversight. DTSC provides guidance for the Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) preparation and cleanup oversight through the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). For additional information on the VCP, please visit DTSC's web site at www.dtsc.ca.gov. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Johnson P. Abraham, Project Manager at (714)484-5476. Sincerely, Haissam Y. Salloum, P.E. Unit Chief Southern California Cleanup Operations Branch Cypress Office cc: Governors Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 Mr. Guenther W. Moskat, Chief Planning and Environmental Analysis Section CEQA Tracking Center - Department of Toxic Substances Control P.O. Box 806 Sacramento, California 95812-0806 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DTSC-1 The comment concerns whether current or historic uses at the Project site have resulted in the release of hazardous wastes/substances. The proposed projects involve the replacement or rehabilitation of existing pump stations that are already in operation on the sites. The IS/MND acknowledges the potential for contamination to occur at the Bitter Point site due to its proximity to the Armstrong Petroleum Oilfield. Mitigation measures in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section beginning on page 48 of the IS/MND ensures that the District will comply with applicable regulations. Since previous uses on the Armstrong Petroleum Oilfield property could potentially have contaminated the site, implementation procedures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Bitter Point Pump Station project require that a site assessment be performed prior to construction activities as part of the final project design. The site assessment will include soil borings and sampling to detect contamination and will be performed by a qualified geotechnical consultant. The geotechnical consultant will prepare a report summarizing the results of soil analysis and providing recommended actions to be implemented during the construction of the pump station to avoid impacts to worker safety and to protect public safety and the environment in compliance with hazardous waste regulations. DTSC-2 The comment states that the IS/MND needs to identify and assess the threats to human health or the environment for known or potentially contaminated sites. Compliance with hazardous waste regulations as required in the mitigation measure included on page 48 of the IS/MND will ensure that public health and safety and the environment are protected. See response to DTSC-I above. DTSC-3 The comment addresses the mechanism to initiate any investigation and/or remediation that may be required for any of the proposed sites. See response to DTSC-I above. DTSC-4 The comment concerns the need for an environmental assessment to evaluate possible contamination from the potential past and current was, including storage, transport, generation and disposal of hazardous waste. See response to DTSC-I above. DTSC-5 The comment addresses the need for an environmental assessment prior to soil excavation and the possible need for expedited response action if the site poses a threat to public health and/or the environment. Mitigation measures in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the IS/MND ensures that the District will comply with applicable regulations. Implementation procedures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program requires a site assessment to be performed prior to construction activities as part of the final project design. The site assessment will involve soil sampling to assess potential subsurface contamination. If the site assessment identifies contaminated soils, than remediation actions could begin in compliance with applicable hazardous waste clean-up regulations and with approval from DTSC or the local Certified Unified Program Agency(CUPA). DTSC and the RWQCB would be notified of any contamination identified during the site assessment as indicated in the mitigation measure. DTSC-6 The comment addresses the possible need for soil characterization and a remedial workplan approved by the appropriate regulatory agency. See response to DTSC-1 and DTSC-5 above. DTSC-7 The comment states the need for proper environmental studies at the Edinger site due to its proximity to the Marina High School. The Edinger site is currently occupied by the existing Edinger pump station,which was constructed in 1965. Neither the site or adjacent properties are listed on the DTSC Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List or in the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. The IS/MND identifies the proximity of Marina High School to the construction site, and concludes that rehabilitation of the pump station would not pose a hazard to the school. Analysis of estimated air emissions indicate that none of the construction or operational activities would pose a health risk to neighboring land uses including the High School. Similarly,the IS/MND concluded that construction noise would not significantly impact local sensitive receptors, including residences within 100 feet. The High School is located over 1,000 feet from the construction site. Mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND include notification of sensitive receptors including the High School of construction periods. Given the temporary nature of the construction and the distance of the High School from the construction site,the IS/MND concluded that the Marina High School would not be adversely affected. DTSC-8 The comment expresses concern that possible past agricultural uses may have resulted in pesticide residues on the sites and proper investigation and remedial action should be conducted prior to new development. The proposed project sites are either occupied by existing pump stations (Edinger) or located in commercial/industrial areas adjacent to the existing pump stations (A Street and Bitter Point). The Edinger Pump Station was constructed in 1965;the A Street Pump Station was constructed in 1948;the restaurant on the A Street Pump Station site was constructed in 1934; and the Bitter Point Pump Station was constructed in the late 1930s. The oilfield on the Bitter Point Pump Station site was established in the late 1960s. It appears that no agricultural operations have occurred on any of the sites since at least the late 1960s. None of the sites are listed on the DTSC Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. The IS/MND provides a mitigation measure on page 48 requiring that any identified contaminated soils be disposed of in accordance with applicable hazardous waste regulations. The area to be excavated for the rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station is within the Edinger Avenue easement, an arterial road not likely to have significant past pesticide exposure. The Bitter Point Pump Station is located in an historical tidal wetland area that is not likely to have significant past agriculture. The A Street Pump Station is located on the Newport Beach peninsula which has not supported full-scale agriculture in the past. DTSC-9 The comment concerns `Border Zone Property." If the proposed project is within 2,000 feet from a contaminated site,then the proposed development may fall under the`Border Zone of a Contaminated Property." Appropriate precautions should be taken prior to construction if the proposed project is on a Border Zone Property. The wastewater pump stations are not considered sensitive land uses that would be impacted by being located within a Border Zone Property. The District will comply with all applicable regulations regarding hazardous waste sites. See response to DTSC-1 above. DISC-10 The comment concerns excavating and disposing of contaminated soil and importing fill soil. The ISMIND provides mitigation measures on pages 48-50 to ensure that the District will comply with applicable regulations. If contaminated soils are encountered during excavation, construction activities will stop. The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)will be notified immediately. Excavation,disposal of excavated soils,dewaterng,and backfilling will occur in compliance with hazardous waste management regulations, under the supervision of the RWQCB, the DTSC, the County Health Care Agency, or the Certified Unified Program Agency(if different)as appropriate. DTSC-11 The comment addresses the proper disposal and remediation of lead-based paint and asbestos in buildings to demolished. The ISMIND provides a mitigation measure on page 48 to ensure that the District will comply with applicable regulations for removal, monitoring, and disposal of asbestos or lead based paint-containing construction materials. DTSC-12 The comment addresses the possible need for a groundwater investigation if groundwater contamination exists at any of the sites. See response to DTSC-10 above. DTSC-13 The comment states that if hazardous wastes are generated by the proposed projects, they must be managed in accordance with applicable regulations. The proposed projects would not generate any hazardous wastes during routine operations. The ISMtND-identified mitigation measure ensures that contaminated soils would be disposed of at Class I or Class II landfills in accordance with applicable regulations. Asbestos-containing materials and lead- based paint removed prior to demolition of the structure for the A Street Pump Station will be disposed of appropriately in compliance with applicable regulations. DTSC-14 The comment concerns the need for a permit for hazardous waste storage, treatment, or disposal. See response to DTSC-13 above. DTSC-15 The comment states the need for a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Identification Number if hazardous waste is generated. See response to DTSC-10 and DTSC-13 above. DTSC-16 The comment states that certain hazardous waste treatment processes may require authorization from the local Certified Unified Program Agency. See response to DTSC-13 above. DTSC-17 The comment concerns discharging treated wastewater to the sewer, which would require a discharge permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The proposed pump station projects do not involve any operational processes that would generate wastewater. Dewatering may be required during excavation if groundwater is encountered. The water would be pumped and discharged to a nearby sanitary sewer to be treated at the District's Treatment Plant. No water would be discharged to the storm sewer, requiring a permit from the RWQCB. DTSC-18 The comment regards procedures to be undertaken if contamination is discovered during construction of any of the proposed projects. The IS/MND provides a mitigation measure on pages 48-50 to ensure that the District will comply with applicable regulations including notification requirements. FEB-24-03 12 : 10 FIR0111 Ci�^71� ID= PAGE 2/2 34351Pilstri.Boul,,,d SIERRA 213)36i6526 ph. Slim 3" CLUB (213)38/S3s3 fi. Las A-grlcs,CA 90010y904 �.E%.Ah,h,,ug tovvom usz Pebivary23,2003 Jim Herberg c%Mgie Anderson Orange Canty Sanitation District 10844 Ws Ave Fountain Valley, CA 9270E RE:Replacement of the Bider Point Pump Station Oear OCSD, The Sena Gub asks mat you reconsider your position regarding this piuied and submit more detailed Environmental Impact Report regerdirr9 the project Thank you for preparing the Initial Shay for the Bitter Point project but its conclusion that a Mitigated Negative Declaration providestha appiopriste level of analysis to comply with CEQA Is are wrong conclusion. This project 6 outside of the scope ofthe FOR mat OCSD submitted in IW9 and this Project requires a more detailed E wironmental Impact Study.The pv,'eCt also requires the purchase of prit2te land and development of that land. Because the issues, potential impacts and complexity of the proposed pmjact it requires a hill FIR. There is currently not enough study of the low wetland wildlife and the potential impact that accidents)spied will have on SC-1 that wildlife,as you plat]to store 4.000 gallons of hydrogen peraidde or magnesium peroxide on land adjacent to existing wetlands.The weekly deliveries will most likely result In spills that hill damage the wetlands. As you are avrare if even a 'fair argument`of a potential impact exdsts within the meaning of CEQA,a full FIR rather than a Negatve Declaration is required. The Sierra Clubs.also as"the Coastal Cohutksion W require an MR for the project We hope we ran work together to help OCSD provide`or me sanitation needs of fhe county,while at the same time protecting its rasbiems and senslme habitats. Finally,the Banning Ranch Pads and Preserve Task Farm(BRPP),a Sierra Club tasK force,is vroriong towards the creation of an open space and-Idfe preserveJpUbW%rildemess pads on the entire Banning P. Thai BRPP is working toward ,the everKua purchase of the entire Banning Ranch.The proposed park at Banning Ranch would not be SC-2 developed for residential or commgdal uses. Nmough Bide Point is being expended to service a large area.OCSD may be able to save some taxpayer money by reducing the pumping capacity at Bitter Point by my amount that was planned for at development of Banning Ranch. Kindest regards, Tetryv Welah Sierra Club Banning Ranch Park and PreseneTasK Force Chairman Costa Mesa,CA 949.540-6636 SIERRA CLUB SC-1 The comment states that the Bitter Point Pump Station Project warrants an EIR due to the complexity of the project. The comment also states that more information is needed regarding potential impacts to wetlands from the planned storage of odor-reducing chemicals. The project involves replacing an existing pump station and providing a storage facility for odor-reducing chemicals pursuant to the District's approved Odor and Corrosion Control Program (OCP). The IS/MND provides a description of the proposed pump station including operational requirements and constmction methods. The Initial Study also identifies potential impacts of the project and provides mitigation measures that would minimize those impacts. The proposed pump station at Bitter Point would be constructed on a 10,000 square foot parcel adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway. Construction would entail excavating to a depth of 32 feet. Once installed, the un-manned pump station would not significantly increase activities at the site. The replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station was identified in the District's Program EIR certified in 1999. The IS/MND acknowledges that small modifications to the pump station project were proposed subsequent to the certification of the PEIR, therefore, the project was included in this IS/MND to disclose the modifications pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. The District's OCP was assessed in a Supplemental EIR certified by the District in December 2002. Under the OCP, chemical facilities me to be installed at pump station sites to reduce foul odors and corrosion in the sewer system. The foul odors and corrosion are attributed to the formation of hydrogen sulfide (112S) gas (rotton egg odor) and oxidizing bacteria present in the sewer system. The H2S gas naturally converts to sulfuric acid; the acid attacks the concrete sewer and can eventually reduce it to a soft putty. The hydrogen peroxide and/or magnesium hydroxide will be used to neutralize the acid and inactivate the bacteria in the sewer system. Operation of the facility would require the transport, storage,and use of these chemicals. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide used at the pump station would be 50% by weight; a concentration greater then or equal to 20%is considered hazardous. Magnesium hydroxide is a non-volatile acid-neutralizer that is commonly used in antacids; similar to "Milk of Magnesia." The identified need for adequate worker protection, spill prevention, and clean up equipment is consistent with the recommendations for handling the substances as noted in the Material Safety Data Sheets in Appendix A of the IS/MND. The IS/MND acknowledges that the chemical storage facilities to be located at the Bitter Point Pump Station would comply with the spill prevention and counter-measures identified in the Supplemental EIR assessing the OCP. These measures would minimize potential impacts of accidental releases of hydrogen peroxide and/or magnesium hydroxide. The OCP storage tank would be double-walled and surrounded by a concrete wall to provide secondary containment that will accommodate the entire tank volume during a 25-year min event. The District's Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC Plan) provides for chemical transfer activities, including Department of Transportation requirements, public notification and placarding requirements, secondary containment, emergency spill response actions, rountine site access control, and site management and maintenance procedures. The contractor's SPCC Plan would require approval by the District's Safety Division. The District will obtain storage permits from the local Fire Department for tank location. The District will comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulation concerning chemical storage. In addition the Orange County Health Care Agency will be notified of the storage locations. The chemicals would not pose an air quality bazard to the public if an accidental spill occurs. The chemicals are used to manage the pH within the sewers. The chemicals become inert once the pH is normalized, and would not contaminate soil or water if released into the environment. The Initial Study concludes that no potentially significant impacts would result from the project. The issues brought up in the comment letters were already considered in the IS/MND, and do not raise new information that was not considered in the IS/MND. Therefore,preparation of an EIR is not considered necessary. Jim Herberg of the District discussed these issues with the commentor in March 2003. The District is willing to continue discussions to provide answers to any questions concerning the design,construction,and operations of the pump station and odor control facility. SC-2 The comment states that the proposed Banning Ranch Park and Preserve would encompass the entire Banning Ranch area. The comment further states that the Bitter Point Pump Station capacity could be reduced since the Banning Ranch development project is no longer planned. The Newport Truck Sewer conveys wastewater from Newport Beach to the District's treatment facility north of the Santa Ana River. The need for a new pump station will exist regardless of the proposed was of the Banning Ranch area. The capacity of the pump station has been designed to accommodate projected future upstream wastewater flows. Potential future flows from the Banning Ranch development would be minor (0.6 mgd) in comparison with the upstream flow from Bay Bridge, Rocky Point, and Lido Pump Stations (28.5 mgd). The existing Bitter Point Pump Station has the capacity to convey up to 5 million gallons per day(mgd). The 1999 Strategic Plan as evaluated in the Program EIR estimated that the Bitter Point Pump Station would be increased to 12.45 mgd to accommodate 2020 peak flows. Currently, the flows being convey to the pump station exceed its design capacity, the pump station has conveyed approximately 10.75 mgd during peak flow events by storing excess flow in the upstream sewers and using all available standby. Since the preparation of the 1999 Strategic Plan, the District has developed a plan to connect several pump stations in the Newport Beach area, creating a linked series of pump stations, with the Bitter Point Pump Station being the last in the series before reaching Treatment Plant No. 2. As a result, the Bitter Point Pump Station has been sized to accommodate 40.9 mgd. This capacity would accommodate the 12.45 mgd as previously planned, plus the combined flows of the Rocky Point Pump Station (5.8 mgd), Lido Pump Station (4.9 mgd), and Bay Bridge Pump Station (17.7 mgd). By connecting the pump stations in a series, the District increases operational flexibility by enabling all flows to be conveyed through one of the two force main lines, allowing the other line to be serviced or used as a standby line, in case of a failure of the primary line or in the event of an emergency. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA �4 February 5, 2003 "•� Mr.Jim Herberg C/o Angie Anderson ASSOCIATION of Orange County Sanitation District GOVERNMENTS 10844 Ellis Avenue Mein Office Fountain Valley,CA 92708 gxa West Seventh Stleel 121h Floor RE: SCAG Clearinghouse No. 1 20030036 Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Rehabilitation of the A Street Pump Station, and Replacement of Los Angeles,California the Bitter Point Pump Station 9ooxr-3455 Dear Mr. Herbelg: I lx13l'+36 IRaa Thank you for submitting the Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, I(mu x36 Has Rehabilitation of the A Street Pump Station, and Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station to SCAG for review and comment. As areawide clearinghouse for www..r.S.'egw regionally significant projects, SCAG reviews the consistency of local plans, projects and programs with regional plans. This activity is based on SCAG's responsibilities SCAG-1 "•^°•^ '•^"a°'^ ' "�^°^^ ......^ as a regional planning X•,n.N.,•.kmnJ Vrc XmN,u:, g P 9 organization pursuant to state and federal laws and .. ....YL,Pr m.Pl..rr.xlr,Mw,Y regulations. Guidance provided by these reviews is intended to assist local agencies I:,:.eN,l rwl.,n Nwl .Wit,, o:rl•=N' and project sponsors to take actions that contribute to the attainment of regional goals """"'•"°iM4J"'�" and policies. W"ylr•<aux,r,Yrwn!N„Lx w•XwM. H�" �..d:xJW svv,:"W".'M.. We have reviewed the Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station, Rehabilitation of the A Street Pump Station,and Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, `ari.;. x wa....l, tan:,. • we": P P er.�6.M::xx„J•.;N.ww.N.M1:n",.^" and have determined that the proposed Project is not regionally significant per SCAG ,tl::WM 1^J, UmLp, I. ;;I".°:I :.h 4Lu¢r.Iw"M.P,•nx Intergovernmental Review (IGR) Criteria and California Environmental Quality Act SCAG-2 (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15206). Therefore, the proposed Project does not warrant comments at this time. Should there be a change in the scope of the proposed Project, ,.Ix.x-.w.,l:x+...nw\nx:,..lr•r 9 Pe "„L"..N.::::.LwrNNI.WyP...•M:,I: we would appreciate the opportunity to review and comment at that time. K4rJry M1a:xY 'rLM, NlvYiwA\ Lry M;<Fr.M1ry O'Onnn.Lm N^Wu.Nxk A description of the proposed Project was published in SCAG's January 16-31, 2003 • ^^ ^=x '^• Intergovernmental Review Clearinghouse Report for public review and comment. xM1M1 tlnrnnm•4u!Fm!•ml�"rvu "'»`»n•I;';:"'""f;;,; "'"�N,Zi::�;':;.','( The project title and SCAG Clearinghouse number should be used in all correspondence '^^•''•^"^_•"^'"aY"""'°^'"^"""' with SCAG conceming this Project. Correspondence should be sent to the attention of the Clearinghouse Coordinator. If you have any questions, lease contact me at (213 asrom,:a••I,.Yw:n...,PX,rrvN, 9 Y P ) •^^'^^^••^^"•»^ ^°^•• 236-1887. Thank you. wnwP. Sincerely Ilrcn^Wrt''aunrryM Onm.e.PPvnN�y (:. � - /�� ��', 4 •PmpmnnlQ,,NirtnL4•"II MIIIx,('unn,p V////F ��� Tnv.'alvr,wle:"WAq Munmrvtlky J-' l,,, n.,:Nminn c Y r.W nNx„ I � �'M. ITH,AICP „„a,.. :��M,»xJ.:. Pa•Ln Senior Regi I Planner Intergovernmental Review cM,I�.,,..Nx^V,Pry•,.rl nW,a..,...,o. xmvnnw, w^ .N.Pa.H:vn"ne M mr1Je 1:o:aq bwlw W Lw[unna..im:: Xtln::Lax..Nnun u^ryRmPv x:n tan:nlxlnn. OiII Wn:,)Inn VAlor SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS SCAG-1 The comment does not raise an environmental issue. Therefore, no response is necessary. If there is a change in the scope of the project, the District will send SCAG a copy of the revised project to review and will reference it with the SCAG Clearinghouse No. 120030036. SCAG-2 The comment does not relate to an environmental issue. Therefore,no response is necessary. The �lias Company- A WSempra Energy`utlliry u February 3,2003 Orange County Sanitation District 10844 His Ave P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley.CA 9272&8127 Attention: James Herberg Subject: Pump Stations ;Edinger,A Srect,Bitter Point This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment, but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company] ompany SE-1 has facilities in the area where the above named protect is proposed. If a conflict with our facilities exists, work can be accomplished to clear the conflict without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance I SE-2 with the company's policies and rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. Sincerely, Robert S. lVarth Technical Supervisor West Region. Anaheim gr Eimosv SEMPRA ENERGY SE-I The comment states that Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) has facilities in the proposed project areas. Maps showing utility locations are included for Informational purposes. As stated on page 66 of the IS/MND,underground utility location surveys will be conducted as part of the projects. Further consultation and contractual arrangements will be made with SCGC, and any other utility service providers, as necessary, to avoid service interruptions or conflicts. SE-2 The comment states that if a conflict exists, work can be accomplished without a significant impact. No response is necessary. Anderson, Angie From: Herberg,Jim Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:02 PM To: Anderson, Angie Subject: FW: Electronic Version of me Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Importance: High Angie, Please respond to this ASAP. If it is posted on our website, please forward the link to Mr. Phillips. Thanks, -Jim --Or inal Message— From: Forinformation Sent Monday, February 10,2003 3:03 PM To:Cassidy,William Cc: Cabral,Jennifer, Beekman, Carol; Herberg, Jim Subject: FW. Electronic Version of the Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station Initial Study/MRigated Negative Declaration — Original Message— From: Everette Phillips[mailto:ephilhpsl@adelphia.net] Sent Monday, February 10, 2003 2:46 PM To: Fodnfonnation Subject Electronic Version of the Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Is it possible to get the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Replacement of Bitter Point Pump Station in PDF form via the web or can it be sent to me via email in any form? It is a great hardship to view and share information on this project in the short allotted time of Jan 23 thru Feb 24 when the El study is not distributed in electronic form. OCSD Board minutes are available in electronic form, so it is a technical capability of OCSD. Kindest regards, Everette Phillips 300 Canal St. Newport Beach, CA 92663 t 300 Canal St. _ Newport Beach, CA 92663 February 11, 2003 Jim Herberg Go Angie Anderson ` Ir.�I,. lrl;, :. Orange County Sanitation Di§ dul i VL-i 10844 Ellis Ave Fountain Valley, CA 92708 RE: Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station &Sewer Line Replacement Dear OCSD, I live in the area known as Newport Shores. There are 2 current projects adjacent to my community, the Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station & a Wastewater Pipeline Repair. Thank you for preparing the Initial Study for the Bitter Point project, but its conclusion that a Mitigated Negative Declaration provides the appropriate level of analysis to comply with CEQA is the wrong conclusion. I feel our community would benefit from a more complete EIR, especially regarding impacts to the wetlands and canals we share as neighbors. This project is outside of the scope of the PEIR that OCSD submitted in EP-2 1999 and this project requires a more detailed Environmental Impact Study. The 30 day review period is just too short for members of the community to give adequate review and feedback. For example, what will be the water table impact be of a 32 feet deep underground structure?How will you keep it from flooding without harming the adjacent wetlands?What will the impact be to the adjacent wetlands from a chemical spill? OCSD could adopt a'good neighbor policy' regarding the Bitter Point project. OCSD could be more proactive to "adopt'the adjacent wetlands and take active measures to EP-3 help clean up the area between Bitter Point and Newport Shores and improve the wetlands. OCSD could also use the wastewater pipeline repair project of the pipeline between Bitter Point and Plant#2 to add more tidal gates reducing the restriction to tidal flow that the pipeline creates. We know much more about the importance of tidal flow today for EP4 wetlands than when the pipeline was created in the 1954. A healthy wetland is important to our neighborhood. Plant#2 may be modem and a great place to work, but it is not the prettiest thing to look at—day or night. Have you considered adding trees along the Santa Ana River side of EP-5 the plant to improve the view from Newport Shores?There is a push to create more willow forest near the wetlands; maybe you could get help from environmental groups? The work of OCSD is very important, and 1 would like to support ft. Please take more steps to be a good neighbor and help us work together on the wetlands, waterways and views that we share. Kindest regards Everette Phillips EVERETTE PHILLIPS EP-1 The continent requests that the IS/MND be emailed or placed on the District's website for viewing. The document was posted on the District's website on February 11, 2003 (htto://w .msd.conVinfo/eirs/default.asy . EP-2 The comment questions the adequacy of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Bitter Point Pump Station project. The District's 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) identified the Bitter Point Pump Station as needing improvements. Therefore, the proposed project is subject to the mitigation measures identified in the PEIR. The IS/MND further examines site specific impacts for the project, which now includes replacement of the pump station, and identifies mitigation measures to reduce those impacts. With regard to the specific questions raised in the comment, pages 11 and 49 address the potential for groundwater dewatering during construction. When the facility is complete,no further dewatering would be necessary. Therefore,no significant impacts to the groundwater table are anticipated. Pages 52 to 54 of the IS/MND address potential flooding impacts. The facilities, including the chemical dosing tank,would be located at least one foot above the 100-year flood plain as required by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Therefore, they would not be subject to 100-year flood impacts. Pages 48 to 50 address potential hazards and mitigation measures associated with operation of the chemical dosing facility. The 4,000-gallon storage tank would be double-walled and surrounded by a concrete wall to provide secondary containment that will accommodate the entire tank volume during a 25-year min event. The IS/MND provides mitigation measures on pages 48 and 49 that would provide adequate protection from the potential hazards associated with the chemicals proposed for storage. The proposed mitigation measures include: • fire department permit approval • spill prevention and notification of the chemical storage site location to the Orange County Health Care Agency • chemical delivery trucks will be equipped with spill cleanup equipment adequate to contain and clean up any solid or liquid spill • chemical storage tanks with adequate secondary containment tanks will be double-walled and a concrete wall constructed around the storage tank • chemical transport contractors will have adequate Spill Prevention Containment and Countermeasure (SPCC) plans in place covering the chemical storage site. The SPCC Plan will cover chemical transfer activities, including Department of Transportation requirements, public notification, emergency spill response actions, routine site access control, and site management and maintenance procedures. The contractor SPCC Plan would require approval by the District's Safety Division.. The District will comply with all applicable local,state,and federal regulation pertaining to chemical storage. EP-3 The comment suggests that the District adopt a "good neighbor policy" regarding the Bitter Point project and take active measures to improve the adjacent wetlands. Although, the wetland comment is noteworthy, it is beyond the District's purview;the District does not own the property and the project does not impact the wetlands. EP-4 The comment suggests that the District add more tidal gates as part of the wastewater pipeline repair project between Bitter Point and Plant No. 2. The referenced force main project is separate from the proposed Bitter Point Pump Station replacement project and does not relate to this ISIMND. EP-5 The comment suggests landscaping be added to the District's Plant No.2 to improve the view from Newport Shores. The comment pertains to the aesthetics of the District's Treatment Plant,not to the proposed project pump station projects. Page 1 of 1 Anderson, Angie From: Herberg, Jim Sent: Tuesday, February 18,2003 8:13 To: Cassidy,William; Anderson,Angie Subject: FW: Questions Importance: High Angie, Please record this message as an official comment on the MND. The pump station capacity is mostly due to the operation of the pump station In series with the upstream stations. Banning Ranch and any other undeveloped parcels would be minor compared with the upstream flows from Bay Bridge and Rocky Point. Please get an exact answer from William. Thanks. --Jim --Original Message----- From:Alan Silcock[mailto:BalboaAl@adelphia.net) Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 3:53 PM To: Herberg, Jim Subject: questions Jim- I met with the committee working on the Orange Coast River Park(OCRP)and shared with them the material you provided to me regarding the Bitter Point Pump Station replacement. They asked a question that I did not have info on...hopefully you do: "How much of the increased capacity planned for the new pump station is due to the potential development o� AS-1 the Banning Ranch?" I told them I would check with you on this, but I felt pretty sure that Banning Ranch development, if any,would probably be a very, very small consideration to the new pumping station plans,since the current one was designed for a much smaller served population and since I presume that a development at Banning Ranch would represent only a fractional addition to the total volume handled by the station...e.g., pretty insignificant. I think those in the OCRP group are looking for anything they can find to support non-development of Banning Ranch (non-development might equal lass of a new pumping station requirement, etc.....). Anyway, please advise and I will pass along to that group. I am not a part of that group, but since they are in West Newport Beach they fall under our West Newport Beach Association(WNBA)"umbrella"and since I am Pres of WNBA I feel obligated to help them obtain info. Thanks, AI Silcock. 02/18/2003 1� ALAN SILCOCK AS-1 The comment asks how much of the increased capacity for Bitter Point pump station is due to the potential development of Banning Ranch. The pump station has been sized to accommodate the upstream flows. The Banning Ranch parcels would be minor(0.6 mgd) in comparison with the upstream flow (28.4 mgd) from Rocky Point, Bay Bridge, and Lido Pump Stations. The pump station would be a similar size with or without the Banning Ranch development. The proposed pump station would be constructed on a 10,000 square foot parcel adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway and within the southeastern comer of the planned Orange Coast River Park and nature preserve. The proposed pump station would occupy approximately a quarter acre of the 412 total acres originally proposed for the Banning Ranch development. See Response to comments SC-2 and VL-I. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Neetlng Date rG ae Gf Dir. 031 i6/03 AGENDA REPORT ThemNuinOer I ItemNume zo Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH SAWPA RE WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY AND SARI RELOCATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Verbal report re the Joint Management Committee activities for the SARI Relocation Project, Contract No. 2-41: a. Report of General Manager b. Report of Director of Engineering C. Report of General Counsel d. Receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated March 19, 2003; correspondence from SAWPA dated January 23, 2003 and March 18, 2003; and correspondence from Orange County Sanitation District dated December 3, 2002 and March 6, 2003. SUMMARY Please refer to the attached memoranda from Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, and Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, dated March 19, 2003. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY NA BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) G'MNbpnaeema Appgi�w,s,2 W 3 aoaN AR�Av W,+➢]OTlum 30.SAW PA.aac ae..ue:v,a9e Page 1 i ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES NA CEQA FINDINGS NA ATTACHMENTS 1. Memo from General Counsel dated March 19, 2003 2. Letter to SAWPA dated December 3, 2002 3. SAWPA dated January 23, 2003 4. Letter to SAWPA dated March 6, 2003 5. SAWPA dated March 18, 2003 6. Memo from Director of Engineering dated March 19, 2003 GA"El¢�dAgenN ft�VW3O WAp Rep =OMem]0.UWPAU ae ieee: WON Page 2 c LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION V MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: March 19, 2003 RE: 1972 Wastewater Interceptor Capacity Agreement As you are all well aware, an ongoing dispute has been in existence between Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD") and SAWPA for over two years, concerning the financial obligations to pay the costs of engineering and environmental studies, construction of a relocated line and administration. We believe the issues are rather straight forward in that the 1972 Agreement establishes the respective rights and obligations of both agencies relative to the SARI line. Nonetheless, SAWPA has consistently objected to OCSD's actions leading to a proposed protection of the presently endangered line. In furtherance of that, it has refused to pay the invoices submitted to it by OCSD, which now approach nearly $4 million. The basic argument we have heard from SAWPA, is that they no longer like the 1972 Agreement, and consider it unfair and inequitable. We have responded by specifically directing SAWPA to give OCSD a proposal that would substantively change the cost allocation formula. [See letters: B. Anderson to J. Grindstaff dated December 3, 2002; SAWPA response of January 23, 2003; Chair McCracken's answer dated March 6, 2003; and the latest SAWPA response of March 18, 2003.] While OCSD now feels assured that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("COE") and County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department ("PFRD") are assuming full responsibility for the costs of the project, it is still necessary to resolve the dispute regarding non-payment of the costs incurred by OCSD. Very little progress has been achieved to date, because of SAWPA's continued refusal to pay for District Staff time expended, which is the major portion of the outstanding amount. I recommend that action be taken as rapidly as possible on the question of whether the 1972 Agreement should be amended. As long as that question remains unanswered, we can expect that SAWPA will refuse to pay the outstanding invoices. IaVWIeucal Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District March 19, 2003 Page 2 We know of no reason why Blake Anderson's meeting with the SAWPA Members' Managers, in April, will have any impact on a SAWPA cost allocation proposed and thus, the request for another two month delay seems to be just that...another delay in payment. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:jlo cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. D.L. Ludwin Mr. G.G. Streed Thomas F. Nixon, Esq. usVwle\Lo=l " r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT V December 3,2002 Joseph Grindstaff Santa Ana Watershed Protection Authority 11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, CA 92503 phone: (714)ae2-2411 n the aftermath of the November 26 Joint Management Committee Meeting,there are several felt 1714)e62C0 6 issues related to the payment of costs associated with the Santa Ana River Interceptor that „„D„ .cmd. om remain unresolved. Most were touched upon during the meeting. mal0op zolif . a: As the JMC directed staff to do so, we must now address these issues. A subcommittee was P.O. Po. ett e127 suggested by Jerry Foan ropey.CA 99 King, which would address certain issues including the payment of 9272e-e127 invoices for work on the Santa Ana River Interceptor incurred since November 1, 2001. In across address: addition to that,there are several other issues that remain to be resolved. I believe and 10e44 Ellis Avenue recommend that they also be the subject of this subcommittee's consideration. Fountain Valley,CA 92708-701B Several suggestions were advanced regarding the make-up of the subcommittee. I am not certain whether an actual consensus was agreed to, but I believe that the discussion could be Member oiled down to the following: Agonme 1. One board member from OCSD, one not presently a member of the JMC. Cities 2. One board member from SAWPA,one not presently a member of the JMC. 3. The Director of Finance of OCSD Arehe'm 4. The Chief Financial Officer of SAWPA area Buena Perk Cypress I suggest that the first meeting occur during the first or second week of December and that the mntein vallev meeting be held at OCSD. December 17, 16, 19 and 20 are convenient for our board member FWlartoe carton ran.. and our director of finance Hvntngton Beach Irvine Le Habra AGENDA ITEMS FOR SUBCOMMITTEE Le Palma Los Ahent. Newport Beach 1. Payment of outstanding OCSD invoices for professional services of Brown & orange Caldwell for the Alternative Analysis Study. San.A. 2. Payment of outstanding OCSD invoices for OCSD staff salaries and overhead for Seoul Beach Alternative Analysis Study. Sla"Eon Pak services an ma 3. Payment of outstanding OCSD invoices for miscellaneous charges for suppliers, Tid materials for the Afterna Analysis tive Anal WIN Pak yStudy. yorbe Linda 4. Payment of outstanding OCSD invoices for staff salaries and overhead for cnaacv or Orange emergency repairs contract 2-41-2. 5. Payment of outstanding OCSD invoices for staff salaries and overhead for original design of project. sanitary Districts 6. Payment of outstanding OCSD invoices for professional services of Brown & Coste Mem Caldwell for original design of project. Midway city 7. Payment of outstanding OCSD invoices for miscellaneous charges for supplies, water Disegeb services and materials for the original design of the project. Irvine Ranch These seven items cover costs paid out by OCSD for the protection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, including the original study and design as well as the current alternatives study through the September 30,2002 billings. To maintain world lass leadership in wastewater and water resource management. 1 Joseph Grindstaff Page 2 T December 3,2002 1 would add that the issue of the final percentage cost-sharing formula for the new environmental work and the ongoing alternative analysis engineering work is a policy decision Ok that will require a considerable amount of discussion. It was discussed but unresolved at the JMC meeting. I believe and recommend that it not be part of the"charter"of this subcommittee. Nevertheless, it ought to be systematically addressed in the next few months. The 50:50 cost-sharing formula for the alternative analysis work envisioned in the MOU was agreed to by both parties as an interim solution so that the work could move forward in the absence of a resolution to this dispute between SAWPA and OCSD. It has now been 12 months without the issue being either systematically addressed or resolved. For this reason, I request that SAWPA provide OCSD with a proposed final percentage cost- sharing formula by January 15, 2003. 1 also request that the basis for the formula be provided at that time as well. As you know, the starting point of this ongoing discussion is whether a formula other than 76:24 ought to be applied to this work, (as originally provided in the 1972 agreement). Our position is that the 1972 agreement ought to hold,and we have consistently so stated. Since SAWPA disagrees, then logically it is incumbent upon SAWPA to offer an alternative. The final percentage cost-sharing formula would apply to past costs as well as future costs. i Please let me know if this approach is acceptable and let me know what dates would be convenient for the SAWPA representatives to meet for the first meeting of the subcommittee. Final details of the date, time and other logistics will be handled by David Ludwin, who can be reached at 714 593-7300. 44a� Blake P.Anderson General Manager BPA:jt C: Shirley McCracken, Chair, Board of Directors James Ferryman, JMC Member, Board of Directors David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Gary Slreed, Director of Finance _ Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority COMMISSION FOR THE PROJECT AUTHORITY EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT INLAND EMPIRE ENY ;- SFAWPA ORANGE COUNTYTES W TIER DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT January 23, 2003 GENERAL MANAGER P.JOSEPH GRINDSTAFF Joint Management Committee Members SARI Protection/Relocation Project Re: Cost Share Proposal Dear JMC Members: At the request of Joe Grindstaff, SAWPA General Manager, I'm forwarding the attached proposal for sharing of costs on the SARI Protection/Relocation Project. We suggest that the two agencies discuss the process outlined in the attached proposal at the next meeting of the Invoice Working Group to be held next Tuesday, January 28`'. The attached proposal was requested by Blake Anderson and it is appropriate to begin discussion of the process now that PFRD will be transitioning towards a lead project role. Please contact Joe Grindstaff or me if there are any questions regarding this proposal. Sinc R�hand . Haller Senior Project Manager Attachment: Cost Share Proposal, SARI Protection/Relocation Project C: Blake Anderson Joe Grindstaff KA,aojecn\SARI protean reloca below Pra40Molat Meoageraent CoaamttceUMC 1a'ller 012303.doc 11615 Sterling Avenue,Riverside,CA 92503-4979• (909)354-4220 Administration FAX(909)785-7076•Planning FAX(909)352-3422 SAWPA will pay its fair share of all work that provides value to the SARI enterprise consistent with the March 2002 Memorandum of Understanding between SAWPA and OCSD. Therefore, SAWPA proposes to: • Jointly evaluate with OCSD, through the Joint Management Committee,the preferred protection/relocation alternative. If different than the least cost responsible project determined by PFRD,the JMC should: o Define the project differences and costs. o Determine the desire and necessity for betterments to PFRD's least cost responsible project,by agency. o Establish funding sources for such betterments. o After external funding sources are deducted allocate remaining costs by the agency requesting such betterments. o Determine and select preferred implementation alternative. o Brief both boards and seek approval to implement the alternative and approve the funding. o Negotiate with PFRD for implementation. • Assist OCSD in working with PFRD to determine and implement the least cost responsible project. • Assist OCSD in negotiating with PFRD for payment of costs incurred to date that provide value to the evaluation,selection and implementation of a preferred protection/relocation alternative. • After completion of negotiations with PFRD,pay a fair share of remaining costs for work that has provided value to the protection/relocation of the SARI. Work that does not provide benefit and value to the SARI system would not be paid for by SAWPA.Further,fair share would be calculated based upon the value of work performed in each reach, capacity ownership,and the related benefits to each agency. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT rn O141982-2411 March 6, 2003 fv: 1714195MISS Chairman and Members of Commission waa...me.eam Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority m0cn°e.eB112i 11651 Sterling Avenue Fri.NiW.0 Riverside, Ca. 92603 92] 8127 ebaate°° ° 1 ells Avenue Subject: SARI Protection/Relocation Project Fountain valley.CA 92708.7018 w"'� The Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD") has received your letter dated January 23, 2003, forwarding a proposal for sharing of costs on the MI.. SARI Protection/Relocation Project. This letter was sent based upon Anaheim OCSD's demand for such, presented to the meeting of the Joint Sma Management Committee ("JMC") on November 27, 2002. Buena Perk F°unlany iey We have carefully reviewed the letter, and reject it as being non-responsive Ganda`,°I'o-prtpevnn to the request of OCSD in several respects. Runbngtan Beach ^"na The November 27, 2002 request demand was based on the fact that over a La Palma period of many months, SAW PA representatives have consistently stated that SAW PA would not pay the invoices submitted by OCSD for services o-ange on this Project for a variety of reasons, including your disagreement with Pa sanhsM An. the cost allocation formula. OCSD has consistently responded that the seal seam allocation formula is set by the specific provisions of Section 4 of the 1972 $ sd an Tu Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement ("1972 Agreement"). OCSD Ya pa e Ran,lbrpe Linda has indicated that it is the basis for a binding obligation on the part of SAW PA to pay the outstanding invoices, or to seek an outside adjudication pursuant to the arbitration provisions set forth in Section 15 of the 1972 Aaltery Bte.riacc Agreement. SAW PA has not done so and has waived its rights thereunder. coat,Mesa Mipavy r"ty At the same time, OCSD has indicated that if SAWPA is proposing a new Water B1str1..s or modified Agreement to replace the existing 1972 Agreement, it must do lrvine Ranch so by presenting a specific proposal in terms of allocation of costs. We remind you that even the March 12, 2002 Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") governs only the limited scope of conducting the Alternatives Analysis for final realignment or relocation. To m8mann warldalsss leedershiR in wastewater and water resource management. SAWPA Commission Members Page 2 March 6, 2003 The basic objections to the January 23, 2003 proposal are: 1. It is a far too lengthy delay in resolving the SAW PA claim that the 1972 Agreement provisions must be changed. 2. OCSD requires that, if any amendment to the allocation formula is agreed to, it must be established before any further expenditures are incurred. This would include Consultant fees, Staff time, legal costs, and out-of-pocket expenditures. 3. The proposal basically creates a formula of negotiating the cost allocation of each item on a case-by-case basis. This is absolutely unacceptable to OCSD. 4. The "fair share", as sought by SAW PA in its proposal, is acceptable to OCSD as a generic term, but the criteria set forth to include value of performance and related benefits is unacceptable, in that it too is the basis for a case-by-case determination. 5. OCSD will insist upon a fixed allocation formula, so that it can adequately plan and budget for work required to be undertaken on the SARI. We hereby give notice that we expect your response, and a specific allocation proposal, to be received by OCSD not later than March 21, 2003. This will allow your Board to meet to study and evaluate any proposal it wishes to submit. Keeping in mind that your Commission and Staff have been discussing and evaluating this for over two (2) years, we do not believe that this is an undue time limit, especially in view of the fact that it is a request of your Commission. This timeline will allow our Board to evaluate the proposal at its regularly-scheduled meeting of March 26, 2003. In the event no such specific proposal is received by the due date, OCSD will continue to consider the 1972 Agreement to be the applicable allocation governing document for all costs, and I anticipate would give notice of termination of the March 12, 2002 MOU and proceed to take all other actions to insure that it recovers all sums owing to OCSD. SAWPA Commission Members Page 3 March 6, 2003 We look forward to receiving your favorable response. Shirley McCracken Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District SM:jt / cc: Board of Directors General Manager Director of Finance Director of Engineering General Counsel Santa Ana Watershed Project Authofi COMMISSION FOR THE PROJECT AUTHORITY EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT INLAND EMPIRE UnUiIES AGENCY SAWPA ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT - SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT March 18,2003 GENERAL MANAGER P.JOSEPH GRINDSTAFF Ms. Shirley McCracken, Chairperson and Members of the Board Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Subject: SARI Protection/Relocation Project Dear Ms. McCracken and Members of the Board: We received your March 6, 2003, letter in which you request a revised proposal for sharing of costs on the SARI Protection/Relocation Project by March 21, 2003. At this time, we have four reactions to your letter. First,we are disappointed in your rejection of our proposal, in part for reasons stated herein. Second, we understand Mr. Blake Anderson has been contacted to make a presentation at a special meeting of the SAWPA's Technical Committee of General Managers in early April. We understand this presentation could result in new perspectives for SAWPA to consider in contemplating settlement of this emotionally charged issue. We need time to consider any new insight we may gain, and we will have our response to you no later than May 13, 2003,the daze of our May Commission meeting. We appreciate your consideration of our January 23, 2003, proposal and we hereby request you to reconsider its merits. We based our proposal on the March 12, 2002, Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and the JMC process because the JMC process is the one process that has been successful. Because of the JMC, we are jointly evaluating all reasonable alternatives and we are proceeding methodically through resolution of the invoice issues. We have jointly developed contractual requirements for the alternatives evaluation as well as for environmental documentation - we had formerly not been successful on these types of efforts. In short, we have clear direction guiding future decisions on this work. We recall the JMC process as resulting from a suggestion proposed by OCSD staff and we are grateful for the wisdom inherent in the concept. Third, your letter suggests that somehow SAWPA has waived its right to arbitration under Section 15 of the 1972 Agreement. Just so there is no misunderstanding, SAWPA has not waived its right to seek a resolution by arbitration under either Section 15 of the 1972 Agreement or Section 12 of the MOU, if such becomes necessary. Indeed, if the current dispute over the outstanding invoices cannot be resolved,SAWPA has every intention of utilizing arbitration to resolve that dispute. 11615 Sterling Avenue,Riverside,CA 925034979• (909)354-4220 Administration FAX(909)785-7076 •Planning FAX(909)352-3422 rr 4 Shirley McCracken and Members of the Board March 18, 2003 - Page 2 Fourth, your letter references a 'Notice of Termination" of the March 12, 2002, MOU. There is no such termination process provided in the MOU, which is consistent with the fact that the MOU is a permanent amendment to the 1972 agreement concerning the subject SARI Reach as referenced in the MOU itself. The only termination process that may occur must be consistent with the provisions of the 1972 Agreement as amended by the MOU. There are significant differences between the way both our agencies view issues that lie in front of us. We believe with the policy guidance of elected board members from both agencies has proven beneficial to the collaborative decision processes both our agencies are committed to. Sincerely, Santa Ana Watershed oject Authority S. R. Al Lopez Chairman of the Commission AL:DW:EH:pb Cb AIU[h 2 OCSD l 3-I8-03 rtv. � nm March 19, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: David A. Ludwin Director of Engineering SUBJECT: Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Status Report The following is a summary of recent work and planned activities for the project: Further Evaluation of Eioht Alternatives by Brown and Caldwell • Brown and Caldwell (B&C) is proceeding on schedule with the further evaluation of the eight alternatives for the protection and/or relocation of the SARI. • B&C submitted a draft report of the further development of the short listed alternatives study for review and comments from the Army Corps of Engineers (COE), Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), and Orange County Public Facilities Resources Department (PFRD). B&C received and addressed comments in the draft final report of the short listed alternatives. • B&C sent by overnight mail the draft final report to SAWPA, OCSD, PFRD, and COE on March 11, 2003. OCSD staff received the final report from B&C on March 12, 2003, and is currently reviewing. Comments are due to B&C by April 12, 2003, and the final report with all comments incorporated will be sent out by mid-May. Environmental CEOAINEPA Services • A teleconference was held on February 26, 2003 between OCSD, SAWPA, PFRD, Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD), and COE. All agencies agreed to produce a joint document for the Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS). ocso 0 P.O-e 5127 • rm, Vanr.G 921 127 0 (714)M.2411 Page 2 of 2 March 19, 2003 The COE will perform all the environmental work including all of the required biological spring surveys on behalf of PFRD. The financial responsibility for the EIR/EIS work would be the local agency, which is PFRD. SAWPA Payment of Outstanding Invoices • OCSD staff continues to work with SAWPA staff in an attempt to resolve the differences of opinions on payment of the outstanding invoice balances. Staffs met in December, January, and February to discuss outstanding invoices and to date, no resolution has been achieved. • SAWPA staff has not paid the full invoiced amounts, claiming that budget for staff time, miscellaneous consultant, and overhead costs were never approved by the JMC and SAWPA Commission. • OCSD staff is preparing a request for the JMC to establish a budget that would cover the outstanding unpaid Invoice amounts. If approved by the SAWPA Commission, the outstanding unpaid invoice balance could be paid by SAWPA. Design and Construction • OCSD staff received a copy of the letter from COE accepting the lead role in designing and constructing SARI as the response to PFRD's letter dated December 12, 2002. The COE does not want to participate in the selection of the alternative (see attached). • An agreement needs to be developed and agreed upon that will outline the participation and responsibilities of PFRD, COE, OCSD, and SAWPA as the project progresses through environmental documentation, design, and construction. DAL:dt:gc G:\wp.dta\eng1710Iudwinlmem.s SARI Memo 031903 Attachment i DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOSANGMUC Toer GONPS OF FNGMEEJ P.O.BOF.SVl11 LOSMW iM1Fb,rxvoaxL.Emssxvs urtr ra ♦n0lINlN OP February 27,2003 Office of the Chief Santa Ana Projects Branch W.Kenneth R.Smith Director Public Works/Chief Engineer County of Orange Public Facilities&Resource,Dept. P.O.Box'4048 Santa Ana,California 92702-4048 Dear I&Smith This letter is in response to your letter dated December 12,2002 regarding the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI)line protection prior to completion of the new Prado Dam Outlet Works. The U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Los Angeles District is able to assume the lead role in designing the SARI line relocation as well as include the work in our Reach 9,Phase 11 construction contract The timing of the relocation and protection of the SARI line downstream of Prado Dam must occur prior to completing the outlet works construction. In addition,all required real estate for the Reach 9,Phase lI construction must be acquired prior to the advertisement of the construction contract We appreciate being included in the discussions,and being informed of the project status. However,the Corps will be involved only in an advisory capacity and not as a participant in the alternative selection process. if requested,we will proceed with a design based on the alternative selected by the County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Depatvnent (OCPFRD),the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA) and the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD). A copy of our environmental response and our engineering response to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District are enclosed Orange County Sanitation District In - plant FOG Impact Study Ak��• �' .a dit. Vw H r N S 1 . 5 f � s i x . Prepared by: November 2002 E ROW N AND C A L D W E L L 16735 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92606.4953 IN-PLANT FOG IMPACT STUDY Prepamdfon ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT November 2002 Prepared 4: BROWN AND CALDWELL 16735 Von Kaman Avenue,Suite 200 Qsfg SSIONq Irvine,Califomia 92606-4953 hWQ4���F,'lH D. FO lF2c W CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................1 ProblemOverview...............................................................................................................................1 ProjectObjectives................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................................1 FOG Composition,Sources,and Chemical Characteristics..........................................................I Methodfor Conducting Study...........................................................................................................3 RelatedStudies......................................................................................................................................4 FOG Best Management Practices Study.............................................................................4 AdvancedDigestion Study....................................................................................................4 Project Limitations and Assumptions...............................................................................................4 FOG Quantities and Treatment...........................................................................................4 FOG REMOVAL PRACTICES.....................................................................................................................5 CurrentFOG Quantities.....................................................................................................................5 Current FOG Process Description....................................................................................................6 In-Plant FOG Impacts and Mitigation Measures............................................................................7 In-Plant FOG Impacts..........................................................................................................7 In-Plant FOG Impact Mitigation.........................................................................................8 Future FOG Collection Practices......................................................................................................8 DEVELOPMENT OF PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES...................................8 Alternative IA—Base Case (Status Quo).......................................................................................10 Altemative 1B-D—On-site Treatment Using Anaerobic Digestion..........................................10 Alternate IB—Modified FOG Receiving and Digestion...............................................11 Alternate 1C—Modified FOG Receiving,Thickening and Digestion.........................15 Alternate ID—Dedicated Digestion.................................................................................16 Alternative 2—Off-site Treatment at a Grease Rendering Facility............................................17 Alternative 3—Off-site Recycling as a Bio-fuel.............................................................................17 Alternative 4—Landfill Disposal.....................................................................................................18 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES.....................................................................................................19 Alternative lA—Base Case (Status Quo).......................................................................................19 Alternative 1B-D—On-site Treatment Using Anaerobic Digestion..........................................19 Alternative 2—Off-site Recycling at a Grease Rendering Facility..............................................20 Alternative 3—Off-site Recycling as a Bic-fuel.............................................................................20 Alternative 4—Off-site Disposal of FOG at a Landfill...............................................................20 Comparison of Alternatives..............................................................................................................20 Evaluation Criteria Weighting.............................................................................................20 Non-Monetary Comparison................................................................................................21 CapitalCost Comparison....................................................................................................22 RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................................25 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................25 BROWN AND CALDWELL 7\rid.\a fog\ond mTp ,fag .mdy (n).dw Nw.bu 2002 CONTENTS (continued) ii TABLES No. FM Table1 OCSD FOG Hauler Sample Summary...............................................................................3 Table 2. FOG Collection Companies.................................................................................................6 Table 3. Evaluation of Alternatives...................................................................................................22 Table 4. Comparison of Alternate Impacts......................................................................................23 Table5. Alternative Capital Costs.....................................................................................................24 FIGURES No. Eege There are three other figures in the report that need to be labeled and included in this table of figures: Figure1. Typical Grease Trap...............................................................................................................2 Figure 2. Alternative lA—Base Case (Status Quo)............................................................................9 Figure 3a. Packaged FOG Receiving System......................................................................................11 Figure 3. Alternative 1B—Combined Digestion with Primary Sludge or WAS..........................12 Figure 4. Alternative 1C—Combined Digestion FOG,Primary Sludge&WAS with Preheating..............................................................................................................................13 Figure 5. Alternative 1D—Dedicated Digestion..............................................................................14 Figure 6. Heated Sludge Blending Tank Schematic.........................................................................15 Figure7. Advanced Digestion Schematic..........................................................................................16 Figure8. Evaluation Criteria Matrix...................................................................................................21 BROWN AND C A L D W B L L p.vaDaa�o�aa far�«aa m-pL,fag impvn naap-f ai report(n)doc November 2002 INTRODUCTION Problem Overview The Orange County Sanitadon District (OCSD) serves the northwest and central regions of Orange County,treating wastewater from 21 different cities and 3 special districts that have a combined population of approximately 2.4 million. Flows treated by the two OCSD wastewater treatment plants,Plant 1 and Plant 2,come from sources including residential,commercial,recreational and industrial users. As the OCSD sewer collection system has grown,there has been an increasing awareness of the impact that fats,oils and grease (FOG) have on the proper operation of the collection system. FOG builds up in layers in the gravity sewers and collects in manholes. This has the effect of reducing available sewer capacity,and can ultimately result in blocked lines causing sewage system overflows (SSOs). For this reason,the OCSD is developing a plan to reduce the amount of FOG discharged into the sewage collection system Project Objectives This project addresses conditions for renewal of OCSD's Waste Discharge Permit order Number R8-2002-0014 issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board,(RWQCB). The objectives of this project are to evaluate disposal options for fats,oil and grease (FOG)generated in the sewer system service area and assess in-plant impacts of these disposal options. Disposal options considered include use of existing anaerobic digestion and other off-site recycling methods. Brown and Caldwell has been retained as a part of its WDR support contract,to (1) develop a plan to evaluate the feasibility of digesting FOG in existing anaerobic digesters and(2) assess alternate methods of recycling FOG,grease rendering and other disposal alternatives,including land filling, etc,within curtent codes and permit requirements.The purpose of this study is to identify alternative disposal and recycling options for handling FOG in the future and assess m-plant impacts of receiving greater quantities of FOG. BACKGROUND FOG Composition,Sources,and Chemical Characteristics FOG present in wastewater is composed of animal fats,vegetable fats,and food solids of varying densities,and water and petroleum based oils and grease. Food based fats and grease are commonly discharged from restaurants and other food preparation facilities. Two common discharges of this type of FOG are in the form of waste cooking oil and grease trap waste. Petroleum-based oils and grease are typically discharged by businesses such as automotive repair facilities,gas stations and car washes. Petroleum-based FOG is relatively simple to regulate and control through industrial discharge and pretreatment permits. Food-based FOG is more difficult to control because of the large number of restaurants and fast food establishments. The focus of this report evaluates the BROWN AND CALDWELL a\tone,\o tog\ocsd mn im,tog impart stWY-final«port(r0.doo November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Stud, 2 impact of the FOG that would be controlled under new BMPs from restaurants and other food establishments. Fats,whether food-based or petroleum-based,can be saturated or unsaturated and can be in either liquid or solid form. Because FOG is composed of materials of varying densities,generally less dense than water,it separates easilv into several lavers floating on the water when placed m a quiescent vessel like a grease trap Or a grease interceptor(See Figure 1). Because of this natural tendencc to float,when combined with other solids such as prirnart-solids or waste activated sludge, FOG can provide an adhering effect that will capture these solids and float them as well. Until the density of the combined grease and solids is equal to or greater than water,this combined mass will float. This effect is like a reverse shear floc process which is used in water treatment—in a DAF the floc matrix moves upward and collects (or shears) particles,incorporating air and solids in a matrix This adhering effect can be beneficial to the DAF thickening process. M 00M LOCKNNLIFT CLFANOUT PENT RMG RaEi n ' G®�t (OUTLET V FLM s4NVLE REGULATORY 08G PONT OEVICE ACCUMULATION AIR RELIEF REMOVABLE BAFFLES SOL. ACLVM WPiION Figure 1. Typical Grease Trap FOG from anirnal fats contains esters (compounds of alcohol)or glycerol (glycerin) and lipids (phospholipids). Phospholipids have long nonpolar"tails"and a small highly polar"head". Although FOG molecules contain both polar and nonpolar components they are generally considered to be polar. FOG that is petroleum-based is nonpolar in nature. Lipids,including phospholipids,are generally defined by biochemists as compounds that,upon hvdroksis (addition of water),will produce fatty adds. FOG faun adds are generally longer chain molecules. In an anaerobic environment, these longer chain faun acids are metabolized b,hydrogen-producing acetogenic bacteria. Add-loving(acetogenic,acetophilic)bacteria consume long chain fatty acids to produce Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA),commonly acetate. Methanogens,in turn consume VFAs to produce methane,etc.,resulting in the formation of hydrogen,acetate,formate and carbon dioxide. One of the important end products from metabolism of these products is methane To vetifi-chemical characteristics of FOG being hauled to the Plant 1 dumping station,samples were collected on three separate days from randomly selected FOG haulers. Results of this sampling are summarized in Table 1 B R 0 W N A N D C A L D WE LL p:\funda`,oasUfur\�:Jin-planl NOYemhcr 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 3 Table 1—OCSD FOG Hauler Sample Summary Sample Date Chmmimn /r TS % VS% PH tme 10,2002 0.49 Data? 6.2 6.85 une 12,2002 0.69 6.06 6.85 June 13,2002 0.37 6.77 5.48 Average 0.52 6.34 6.39 ' Chc iini was recomtrended by OCSD source iron"staff as an indicator for heavy metals. Chromium is teat an ekment that is found commode in wastewater,which make it a good indicator. Method for Conducting Study Brown and Caldwell collected and reviewed data in order to develop ahematives for handling FOG and assessing m-plant impacts of FOG treated on-site. Information sources include: • OCSD staff and plant data • Brows and Caldwell archives and other related literature (see references for other related literature used in preparation of this report) • Statement from commercial recyders,rendering and landfill disposal companies • FOG samples collected from random FOG haulers and analyzed for volatile solids,total suspended solids,pH and total chromium(as an indicator for heavy metals). Future samples may want to be analyzed for copper since copper sulfate,when found in septic tanks,is commonly seen as an indicator of a mixed load. A kickoff resetting was held in June 2002 to define some of the process issues related to on-site treatment of FOG and establish evaluation criteria. This meeting also served as a brain storming session to begin to develop alternatives. Dedicated anaerobic digestion was introduced as an alternative by OCSD staff as a result of beach scale testing that had been perforated many years before. Alternatives have been developed for both on-sire and off-site disposal options. These alternatives address the issues noted in the Waste Discharge Permit renewal requirements. Capital cost estimates have been prepared for each alternative for economic comparison. A noneconomic comparison of each alternative has been made based on criteria established at the kick off meeting held with OCSD staff. These criteria included: Operational/process impacts, maintenance task impacts,staffing impacts,traffic impacts,economic/lifecyde impacts and environmental impacts. A workshop was held on October 9,2002 with OCSD staff to determine which impacts hold greater weight,tiro rank each alternative by evaluating them and summing the weighted values for each evaluation criteria. When OCSD con"selection of a preferred alternative an implementation schedule will be developed. B R O W N A N D C A L D W B L L ,:Vada\orsd November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 4 Related Studies Orange County FOG Control Study. A parallel study is being conducted by another engineering fima under contract to the OCSD by Environmental Engineering and Contracting,Inc. to investigate ways FOG can be Controlled at the source and keep FOG from entering the collection system They will be developing Best Management Practices (BMPs)and evaluating chemicals or other materials that break down FOG,as well as other new technologies. Phase 1 of this investigation is scheduled for completion by February 2003 with a subsequent Phase 2 study dependant on the results of Phase 1. To mitigate SSO's and other operational challenges,it is important that a comprehensive pretreatment ordinance,enforcement and grease trap sizing be implemented Future FOG quantities collected and disposed of at the Plant No. 1 will likely increase as a result of implementing any new ordinances. Advanced Digestion Study. Brown and Caldwell recently prepared a report for OCSD that evaluated akemative advanced smaembic digestions methods. That report has been used for background data relative to digester performance,digester capacity and future digester expansion needs. To simplify digester feeding and provide homogeneous solids loading to the digesters, Brown and Caldwell proposed a heated solids blending tank that would blend primary solids and thickened waste activated sludge. One of the alternative advanced digestion processes recommended was a series themnophilic/mesophilic arrangement. This blending tank would also serve as a "wet well"to feed the digestets and provide a place for heat recovery from the thermophilic phase of digestion prior to the mesophilic phase. The theanophilic phase operates at approximately 135 v F and the mesophilic phase operates at approximately 95°F. To cool the sludge going from the thetmophilic digester to the mesophilic digester,sludge cooling heat exchangm would recapture heat energy. Since the recommendations of the Advanced Digestion Study have not been adopted yet by the OCSD,it is assumed that the current mesophilic mode of digestion will continue for several more years. Project limitations and Assumptions FOG Quantities and Treatment. The OCSD Strategic Plan written in 1999 only addressed FOG that enters the plant under normal flow via the collection system This present study supplements the 1999 plan to address process and other impacts on the umarient plants as a result of FOG quantities diverted from entering the collection system and discharged directly at the treatment facility. The future FOG load being diverted from the collection system could vary from 45,000 to 180,000 gallons a day or 30 to 120 trucks per day assuming an average truck size of 1,SW gallons. This estimate assumes FOG is collected from approximately 7500 restaurants with 750-gallon FOG interceptors pumped out from 2 to 12 times per year. Typically restaurants will have their interceptors pumped out when business is slow or when they are closed. This could result in peak FOG flows which are considetabh higher than average,and occurring on Mondays or Tuesdays when some restaurant are dosed The BMP study is intended to reduce FOG flow entering the sewer collection system through the use of FOG interceptors,use of chemicals or enzyrues to break down FOG or other FOG reduction methods. Recommendations from that study will be given to OCSD and contributing IIOWR AID C A L D W I L L P:V—&\« fog\—,a f"s-P.tt Novanber 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 5 agencies to pass ordinances to control the discharge of FOG to the collection system Installation of FOG interceptors and periodic inspection of these interceptors will ensure that they are being properly maintained and pumped out. This in-plant FOG impact study assumes that future FOG ordinances would be passed requiring FOG interceptors and FOG being hauled to the OCSD dumping station. This would result in the greatest impact to the plant site. Since the BMP study will not be completed until the beginning of 2003,no estimate is available currently for future FOG quantities in the collection system. A gross estimate of increased FOG quantities could be assumed to be parallel to the projected wastewater flow growth rate of 4%used in the OCSD Strategic Plan. Increase future FOG quantities being hauled is assumed to be a direct result of number of restaurants in business and improved compliance and enforcement of any FOG ordinance issued as a result of the BMP study. The on-going BMP study will include projections of FOG quantities diverted from the sewer system as a result of implementing various BMP plans When a more accurate estimate of FOG delivered to the treatment facility is available,the number used in this study will need to be revised. Future FOG quantities play a small part in development of treatment and disposal alternatives. Future FOG quantities only factor in to the assessment of in-plant impacts on various processes that may be called upon to treat the FOG.Alternatives utilizing existing anaerobic digestion capacity will not be impacted because there is substantial excess digester capacity and FOG quantities are small in relation to projected future sludge flows. As noted above, depending on how well the BMP plan is implemented and enforced, truck traffic both inside and outside the plant could be significantly impacted. Since Plant No. 1 has the facility to received trucked FOG,on-site treatment of FOG will be limited to Plant 1 where the FOG haulers currently discharge their loads with the exception of Alternative 1A that continues current disposal practices. FOG REMOVAL PRACTICES Current FOG Quantities Currently,several FOG haulers throughout the OCSD collect FOG from existing grease traps. OCSD Operations staff reported that most FOG collected is not mixed with other liquid waste such as septage,however,some mixed loads do come in from time to time. Companies that collect and me pertitted to discharge FOG are listed in Table 2. Some of these FOG haulers also handle septage. Typically,FOG hauler trucks have a capacity of approximately 1,500 gallons as regulated by CalTrans and local road weight limits. Plant 1 typically receives 27 trucks a day or approximately 40,000 gallons per day. As noted in this table,two of the permitted FOG haulers are also FOG processors (tendering companies). BROWN AND C A L D W B L L pAf w\« fvg\« m-u,L t rim, ,., Y-�A. trq.� November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 6 Table 2.FOG Collection Companies Permit Number Waste Hauler 2 Orange County Septic 5 Inland Pumping 29 Minuteman Pumping 34 The FOG Co anv/Baker Commodities Tendering corn 52 primer Processors 92 Rvker Commodities 117 Darling International (Rendering company) Current FOG Process Description Liquid waste (septage) and FOG are presently disposed of at a dumping station located at the north end of Plant 1 adjacent to the Ellis Avenue entrance. Haulers enter the plant at this location,drop off a copy of their manifest outside the plant gate,then proceed to the dumping station. The dumping station can accommodate two trucks at a time in two separate waste hookups. Each waste hookup has a solid metal covet over a 4-inch quick connect fitting. When a haulers arrive at the dump station,they connect one end of their discharge hose to their truck and the other end to the quick-connect fitting at the dump station and finally open their discharge valve allowing the load to flow by gravity. All trucks ate equipped with reversible pumps that can vacuum the waste from grease naps and pressurize the tank to discharge faster or discharge into a receiving tank. Operations staff reported that an occasional load of spoiled olive oil is received from a local olive processing facility. The haul truck's reversible pump can be used to discharge this spoiled olive oil directly into a digester through a pipe fitting on the cleaning hatch on the side of the digester. FOG-laden wastewater is typically discharged from the haul truck at the dumping station and flows to the influent diversion structure by gravity. City water is used to flush the solids along the line, similar to flushing a toilet. At the diversion structure,the FOG is diverted to Plant 2. Operations staff reported that there is sufficient flow in the trunk line to Plant 2 to prevent FOG from coating this line. Figure 2 shows a schematic of current base case FOG treatment practices. At the diversion structure the discharged FOG combines with other wastewater flow and proceeds through the normal treatment process at Plant 2. Some FOG has a tendency to form grease balls and chunks that are removed mechanically at the barscreens or manually removed at the aerated grit tanks. After screening and degritting at the headworks, floarable material is removed in the primary sedimentation tanks by+the scum collection system The collected scum consists of the FOG that was dumped by the FOG haulers as well as FOG transported to the plant from the wastewater collection system The scum is periodically pumped and combined with primary sludge. This mixture then flows to the anaerobic digesters. Grease present in the scum/primary sludge has a tendency to mat the primary sludge lines. Consequently constrictions in the pipe results in higher head loss,which reduces flow to the digesters. To alleviate this problem,parallel bypass piping has been provided to allow for periodic steam cleaning of the primary sludge line. BROWN AND CALDWELL P\fonds\acxl fag\aasJ November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 7 Operations staff indicated that gas production at the digesters increases somewhat when FOG, mixed in with the primary sludge,reaches the digesters,although no specific data was provided. The City of Oxnard which uses similar methods for receiving FOG has cited a figure of approximately an additional 50 cubic feet of methane gas per 1,400-gallon truckload of FOG. Unless a digester is well mixed and has a way of removing surface floating material,digesters have a tendency to form mats at the top from a combination of hair,rags and scum Operations staff reported that there is not a noticeable problem with matting in the anaerobic digesters. This would imply that the existing digesters have adequate mixing or good scum removal or both and are suitable for treating FOG discharged at the treatment plant. In-Plant FOG Impacts and Mitigation Measures In-Plant FOG Impacts. Depending on how and when FOG enters the treatment system,there can be greater or lesser degrees of impacts on the plant process operation and maintenance. FOG that enters the treatment system at the head of the plant would have the greatest impact effecting each process it goes through. Because of its natural tendency to float,FOG would separate easily in aerated grit tanks and primary sedimentation tanks. Grease balls that form in these locations may need to be manually removed when surface skimming equipment isn't provided such as aerated grit chambers. Primary scum troughs and scum pumping pits can also become clogged with grease as well. Just as FOG can plate gravity sewer lines in the collection system,FOG can also coat and dog conveyance pumping systems and the plant piping. This can result in more frequent maintenance of sludge pumps and piping to remove FOG plated on equipment. Typically,lines that convey FOG see small in size (4 to 6 inches) and are routed behind larger piping. This arrangement makes these lines less accessible for cleaning and could result in less frequent maintenance. The number of joints,bends and elevation changes of lines conveying FOG can also have a negative effect on FOG accumulation. Joints and fittings are generally grooved and gasketed which provide an ideal for grease to get"caught on". When the ultimate treatment process to handle FOG is anaerobic digestion,the distance between the point of application and the digesters is also a contributing factor to plating FOG on pipelines. Odors can also be a major consideration,especially in Southern California where warmer temperature prevails. The greatest odor problems will occur during cleaning operations because these lines and equipment are generally inside buildings or pipe tunnels that need to be properly ventilated. Implementation of a BMP program to reduce the amount of FOG entering the collection system may increase the quantity of FOG being collected and hauled to Plant No. 1. As mentioned earlier, this could result in over 100 trucks per day delivering FOG to the dumping station or other discharge point. Traffic both on and off site could be significantly impacted by the increased number of trucks. BROWN AND C A L D W R L L �.uJnuar.w roruorsa��-��<fog impx'.mdy-won mpon(aymr November 2002 i Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 8 In-Plant FOG Impact Mitigation. There are several ways to mitigate the impacts described above. Selection of the discharge point for FOG is an important factor to consider when developing alternatives for treating FOG on-site. As noted above,FOG that is discharged at the head of the plant would have the greatest impacts on the treatment system. To avoid clogging primary scum collection and pumping systems,changes to increase the capacity of tipping troughs and surface sprays may be needed. Hot water sprays may also be advisable. As with thickened sludge lines,glass-lined steel piping has proven to be the most resistant to accumulations. Making individual pieces of pipe as long as possible to reduce joints would lessen the sites that grease could be caught on. Providing dedicated steam Imes for cleaning is advisable as well as placing cleanouts in places that are easily accessible would facilitate more efficient maintenance. Reducing the distance between the application point and the digesters will reduce the possibility of FOG plating. To maintain the"food product"classification of FOG,it should be kept separate from other waste streams(septage,primary sedimentation and wcundary clarifier scum lines,grit and screening wash water lines). The sole purpose of doing this would be to allow the plant the option of contracting with a tendering contractor to remove it and allow them to recycle or treat it The cost of this "insurance"would be a"rock solid"way to ensure the plants ability to handle a wide arny of possibilities. The surest way to reduce the amount of odors is to keep the FOG contained,have direct wnnection to odor collection equipment where FOG is discharged and arrange for portable odor control facilities during maintenance activities. Traffic impacts could be mitigated by having a separate entrance dedicated for FOG deliveries only. The entrance could also be equipped with a card reader to control access and document loads as they enter the plant site. Careful consideration of other traffic patterns on the plant site as well as track staging will reduce the impact of increased truck traffic. Future FOG Collection Practices As noted earlier,the OCSD is in the process of developing a BMP program to reduce the amount of FOG being discharged into the sewer collection system in an effort to reduce sewer system overflows (SSO)s. This program may result in an increased amount of FOG diverted from the collection system and disposed of at the OCSD treatment facility. DEVELOPMENT OF PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES Processing and disposal alternatives for FOG received directly at the OCSD treatment plants are developed and discussed below.Impacts associated with their implementation are addressed in a subsequent section of this report Each alternative assumes compliance with new FOG ordinances passed as a result of the BMP study.OCSD source control staff indicated that any alternative that brings FOG on site must include a card access system for plant entry control and load documentation. A separate gate for FOG haulers nay also be considered. Alternatives that have been developed include: BROWN AND C A L D W B L L P.\room\a.,a fag\o m-fir tog Novembet 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CURRENT F.O.G. TREATMENT FOG DIVERSION STRUCTURE HAULER A PLANT I PLANT 2 SCREENING AERATED GRIT REMOVAL PRIMARY PRIMARY SLUDGE PRIMARY EFFLUENT SEDIMENTATION (TO SECONDARY TREATMENT) SCUM & FOG SCUM e PUMPS el8 DIGESTER GAS (TO COGENT DEWATERING THICKENED WAS ALTERNATIVE IA - BASE CASE (STATUS OUO) ffl�, . WE B R O W N AND SCALE a NONE 2216D C A L D W E L L ;t;„ O „M «,T, S T,T,p„ OSTMT FIGURE 2 T.ac.,nuT„a,T MEWAUVe SAN DMGO,CALIFORNIA 1 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 10 IA. Base case—status quo (continue current practices of receiving FOG and disposal) IB -D. On-site treatment using anaerobic digestion 2. Off-site recycling at a grease rendering facility 3. Off-site recycling as a bio-fuel 4. Off-site landfill disposal Alternative fA—Base Case(Status Quo) This alternative would continue receiving FOG at the existing dumping station,removing FOG and scum at the primary sedimentation tanks,pump it to the digesters with the primary sludge and anaembically digesting it. Divert other waste oils,such as waste olive oil or cooking oil,directly to a digester(partial implementation of Alternative 1D). New glass lined piping is recommended to replace existing primary sludge piping. As noted in the mitigation measures discussed earlier upgrades to the scum collection system may be required to reduce expected increased maintenance. The plant would also continue their maintenance procedure of switching to a parallel primary sludge line while the other line is steamed cleaned. Increased maintenance of these sludge pipes is expected with the increased FOG quantities delivered to the site. Some change to traffic control or receiving schedules may be needed to accommodate increased truck traffic on City streets. Alternative IB-D—On-site Treatment Using Anaerobic Digestion These alternatives would modify the current processing of FOG in the anaerobic digesters and assumes that the existing digesters are adequate to handle FOG without modifications. Possible variations of this alternative would include: 1B Modified FOG Receiving and Digestion(See Figure 3 for schematic) - Receive FOG at a new dumping station located closer to the digesters,pumping it to the digesters after the digester heat exchanger followed by anaerobic digestion. Injection at this point would liquefy the grease solids and reduce the possibility of fouling the heat exchangers. Locating a dedicated dumping station closer to the digesters would reduce the plating of FOG on the sludge feed lines. 1C Modified FOG Receiving,WAS thickening and Digestion (See Figure 4 for schematic)-Receive FOG at a new dumping station closer to the digesters,pumping it to the DAF thickener afterthickening followed by anaerobic digestion. 1D Dedicated Digestion (see Figure 5 for schematic) -Pumping FOG directly into a dedicated digester followed by anaerobic digestion. A discussion of each variation is further described below. BROWN Asa C A L D W B L L p;\faya\.d fog\«rd implom fog im ,amdl,-Mal sport(d7.doc November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 11 Alternate IB—Modified FOG Receiving and Digestion.This alternative would involve the following new structures and equipment: 1. New receiving station with coarse solid/grit removal and FOG pumping located along the East Perimeter road north of Secondary Clarifier 2. Figure 3a shows a typical FOG pretreatment systcm i aIe it ... a..Y L� — - I Figure 3a. Packaged FOG Receiving System Note: The FOG receiving system shown above may be equipped with an automated logging system to keep track of loads and haulers for billing purposes. Grit,rocks and other material would be scrolled up an inclined screening channel and dewatered prior to dumping in a roll off container. The new receiving station could be covered with foul air withdrawal and treatment to reduce odor control needs. 2. Glass lined ductile iron FOG distribution piping to existing digesters in existing pipe trenches. BROWN AND C A L D W B L L �,,f,.d.\—d fo \a Wu.-C1.—,6g�-,i ,Wk-f Annm W).da November 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT F.O.G. TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES FOG HAULER 1 NEW FOG PRETREATMENT ROUGH SCREENING GRIT & ROCK REMOVAL OPTION I OPTION 2 PRIMARY DAF WAS SEDIMENTATION THICKENING PRIMARY A E4 THICKENED SLUDGE WAS DIGESTER GAS (TO COGEN) TO DEWATERING ALTERNATIVE IB - COMBINED DIGESTION WITH PRIMARY SLUDGE OR WAS SCALE 1 NONE BROWN AND 2216D C A L D W E L L �� OR C,TT a 700w WTACT FIGURE 3 r, 1 TY T LLXWAT BAN DIEOO.CALIFORNIA 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT F.O.G. TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES FOG HAULER 1 NEW FOG PRETREATMENT ROUGH SCREENING GRIT & ROCK REMOVAL PRIMARY THICKENED PRIMARY SLUDGE BLENDING WAS DAF 'WAS SEDIMENTATION TANK THICKENING HEX DIGESTER GAS (TO COGEN) BLENDED SLUDGE AND FOG TO DEWATERING ALTERNATIVE IC - COMBINED DIGESTION FOG, PRIMARY SLUDGE & WAS WITH PREHEATING BROWN AND SCALE T NONE i6D WE C A L D W E L L macr FIGURE 4 µ AI M ORD CMTT UNT,TIOM DSTWCT IA4.1f14TIpNi 41CIMGTYC BAN DUOO,CALIFORNIA 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT F.O.G. TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES DIGESTER GAS (TO COGEN) FOG HAULER DEDICATED DIGESTER GAS FOG (TO COGEN) DIGESTER PRIMARY SLUDGE TWAS COMIXED DEWATERING DIGESTER 7 ALTERNATIVE ID - DEDICATED DIGESTION BROWN AND SCALE a NONE 2216D C A L D W E L L °'mot, FIGURE 5 ,at„ft w Caen, c TeTWM WT=7 SAN DR:OO,CALIFORNIA raa raa,m,T u,eMwme 1 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 15 Alternate 1C—Modified FOG Receiving,Thickening and Digestion.This alternative would involve the following new structures and equipment: 1. New receiving station with coarse solid/gtit removal,odor control and FOG pumping located along the East Perimeter road south of Secondary Clarifier 2 adjacent to the DAFs. 2. Heated sludge blending tank(heat to approximately 85° F)to receive raw Primary sludge,thickened WAS and FOG. Figure 6 shows a heated sludge blending schematic. 3. Glass lined ductile iron FOG piping to new heated blending tank,blended sludge pumps and piping to digesters. Heated Blending tank Anaerobic Digester NNnsy sludge,Mlcaered WAS %FM and FOGgtutlgFBNdegF Heat Fillhanger Heat Exchanger Nore:'Cenmen�ures ahownrorepresen,the concep�of nw eludge pahr+dng. Acrvil ccmpensuea nn�van. Figure 6. Heated Sludge Blending Tank Schematic The heated sludge blending structure will contain one shell and tube heat exchanger,centrifugal sludge pumps and sludge grinders (if chopper pumps are not used for raw solids circulation). This heated sludge blending tank would add a small amount to the heat load for mesophilic digestion due to some heat losses at the blending tank The heat load at the digesters would be less because the incoming sludge would be preheated prior to digestion. If advanced digestion is implemented in the future,it could be used as a part of heat recovery,following themwphilic digestion. Figure 7 shows a possible advanced digestion schematic. BROWN AND C A L D W B L L pAfoeda\« fog\.d Implvu fog imprcremdc.fmol report(,I)A« November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 16 Heated Blending tank Thermophilic Mosophilic Anaerobic Digester Anaerobic Digester Pommy sludg,ftu im WAS caV-� .M 1.ee 1.1Ne 1.as degf sludge to swage Her VhWHeat sechanger Heat eaeha Nine Taryerwum shown to mprtscn,the concept of cna dadge preheating. Aceed rperntues nor%an. Fignte 7. Advanced Digestion Schematic Ahernate ID—Dedicated Digestion.This alternative would involve using Digester 7 for dedicated anaerobic digestion.Digesters 5 and 6 are currently used for sludge holding prior to dewatering and Digester 8 c mently doesn't have adequate automation to make it suitable for this alternative. Operations staff indicated that a bench scale pilot test of this alternative was performed about 20 years ago,but no data was kept from that test. This pilot test was fed exclusively from scum box material, They stated that it took about 2 weeks for the process to be established,but solids destruction and gas production continued thereafter. Once the culture was established digestion became rapid. About 65%of volatile solids in raw sludge digestion is converted to gas. Because of the high level of volatile solids destroyed,very little sludge production is expected However,there is no empirical data to support this assumption. Before this alternative would be impkarented,it would be wise to conduct this pilot test again using samples taken from FOG haulers to determine process perfommmce and other design considerations. FOG could be pumped directly into the existing digester via a nozzle connection located on the removable access hatch located near ground level or injected downstream of the existing heat exchanger. Operations staff stated that waste olive oil had been received in this manner in the past It would be preferable to inject the FOG downstream of the heat exchanger to ensure the FOG is in liquid form when it enters the digester. No modifications to the existing digester are anticipated, however some paving and drainage modifications may be necessary to facilitate increased traffic flow in the area and capture possible liquid spills. Injection downstream of the heat exchanger would inquire some piping modifications to the sludge recirculation piping. BROWN AND CALDWELL p:\tanm\mad fug\aid oryhntfigitnp:tsudc-finery eepm(:gaoc November 2002 Chnge county Switation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 17 Alternative 2—Off-site Treatment at a Grease Rendering Facility FOG rendering is a process that converts animal processing wastes,including bone and fat,into usable products such as soap,costretics and animal feed. FOG collected from grease traps may also be recycled in this manner as a raw feed material As noted earlier,Baker Commodities,one of the FOG haulers listed in Table 3,is one of the largest rendering facility operators in the Los Angeles area. Baker Commodities and Darling International indicated that there may not be sufficient capacity at their facility to handle all the FOG and that the tipping fee would be between 11 and 15 cents a gallon. An article published by the Farm Bureau Federation dated December 20,2000' described the crisis that faced the agriculture industry as a fallout of the national energy crisis. Rendering facilities use natural gas to beat slaughterhouse byproducts to separate the solids,liquids and fat Skyrocketing gas and electricity prices could[Hake the rendering business economically unfeasible or they will have to pass on these increased operating costs to their customers. One solution to this crisis could be using yellow grease,as a bio-fuel to ram the boilers at the plant If OCSD those this alternative,they may be forced to raise their dumping fee to offset the cost of disposal in this manner. Currently OCSD charges FOG haulers 3.5 cents a gallon to discharge at the treatment plant Adding the cost of the rendering plant tipping fee of up to 15 cents per gallon would increase the cost of dumping at the treatment facility to 5009/6 of the current cost These costs may vary significantly due to changes in the market,snaking cost control for this alternative difficult to predict This may have an adverse effect on the FOG haulers and may discourage collection of grease trap wastes. Implementation of this alternative would involve constructing a storage tank at the plant to allow rendering companies to withdraw FOG waste for subsequent hauling to the rendering facility. If the rendering facility will not provide FOG waste pickup,OCSD would either have to contract this hauling operation to another FOG hauler or enter the hauling business at additional expense. Because there would be no reduction in(quid volume the amount of truck traffic to and from the site would double. Alternative 3—Off-site Recycling as a Bio-f icl In response to the worldwide energy crisis, to reduce the United States'dependence on foreign fuels, and to promote a cleaner environment,tle US government has provided incentives for development of other clean renewable fuel sources. One product drat has emerged in die last decade is clean-burning bio-fiiel called bio-diesel,produced from recycled vegetable oils. Biodiesel has physical and chemical properties verb-similar to petroleum diesel.Howevet,because it is non-toxic,biodegradable and essentially free of sulfur and carcinogenic benzene,it produces a significantly improved emissions profile.In addition, the additional oxygen in biodiesel improves Souza,Christine,"High energy prices send dais-industn-into tailspin",California Famr Bumu Federation Ag Alert, 1av�v ctbfrnm/apalert/1996-00/200 11aa-1220..htm Licwmbec 20,2000 BIOWB era C A L D W B L L r\faada\om ag\omd w-plait fag inTn.NdY-ca>t itwn(.ry.ao< Nwembcr 2002 Orange County sanitattonDistna la In-Plant FOG Impact Study combustion and makes for a significantly cleaner bum. Bio-diesel is a very effective fuel additive mixing readily with petroleum diesel. In a 20a/o blend with diesel,emissions are significantly reduced. Pacific Biodiesel located in Hawaii has reported using 1000/6 biodiesel with no reduction in engine performance. No engine modifications are needed to bum bio-diesel. Bio-diesel also has improved lubricity reducing maintenance of injectors and injector pumps. When compared to diesel fuel,bio-diesel may produce the following results (results are based on side by side diesel locomotive engine test): • Reduce NOx by 5 to 14 percent, • Lower particulates up to 65 percent,virtually eliminating black smoke • Improve fuel efficiency by 5 to 13 percent. • The same additive in gasoline can improve fuel efficiency and reduce NOx by proportionate amounts while reducing CO&HC by 60 to 70 percent Two bio-diesel companies,American Bio-Fuels,LLC and Southern States Power Company,Inc., have expressed an initial interest in fomdng a partnership with OCSD to produce useful bio-diesel fuel that could be used in OCSD's and other nearby cities'fleet of diesel powered vehicles and stationary equipment OCSD could reap the benefits of improved engine performance,educed air emissions,reduced diesel consumption while doing its part in supporting this emerging technology. Bio-diesel is produced predominantly from waste cooking oil. Since FOG collected from grease traps typically has a lower concentration of oil,this alternative would be most feasible if waste cooking oil could be collected separately. Currently Darling International has placed containers at a number of restaurants to collect waste cooling oil for their rendering process. The Biodiesel refiner could offs the same service to these businesses or form a partnership with the rendering company to obtain this oil. Such an arrangement would be of no economic benefit to the District. It would be more economical for the refiner to pick up waste oil at a central location such as one of the treatment plants,however this would involve another handling step for a liquid waste hauler. American Biodiesel is currently exploring opportunities in Mexico to operate a pilot facility to handle grease trap waste and would like to open discussions with the District to place a pilot facility at the plant site. Pilot testing of this process should confirm feasibility of producing yellow grease from grease trap waste within the next six months. Other technologies are emerging to concentrate the yellow grease portion of FOG for use as a feed stuck for the biodusd refining process. A byproduct of this process is a dark glycerin that most still be landfilled. No commercial operations using this technology handling grease trap wastes are currently in business on the mainland. Alternative 4—Landfill Disposal Landfill disposal could be done by combining solidified grease with grit and rags removed at the headworks at the County landfill disposal site. This alternative is less desirable than others because DROWN AaD CALDWELL is\a„d,\androg\and n,ylva fag Novemlxr 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 19 it would be contrary to California's regulations requiring diversion of recyclable wastes from landfills. Disposing of FOG at a landfill would require other recyclable solids to be diverted. Implementation of this option would require the same structures and equipment as Alternative 2. This would require some form of FOG concentrator,such as a gravity settling tank or a DAR Increased odor emissions would be expected as weD as increased traffic. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES In this section each of the alternatives listed above are further evaluated based on the following criteria established at the June 2002 kickoff meeting. A workshop was held in October 2002 with OCSD staff to rate the relative impacts listed below: • Operational impacts—Impact on treatment process unit operation and changes to Standard Operating Procedures • Maintenance task impacts—Impact on type and number of maintenance tasks in the treatment facility • Staffing impacts—Impact on staffing • Traffic impacts—Impact on facility vehicular traffic • Economic Impacts (treatment costs)—Impact on cost for treating FOG including revenue gained or lost by beneficial byproducts of FOG treatment(such as methane gas generation) • Environmental Impacts—Permitting and other impacts on the environment at the plant site and point of discharge in the form of increased odors,increased oils to the ocean, exhaust emissions from trucks,etc. Alternative IA—Base Case (Status Quo) The impacts of continued operation of the facility as it currently exists is provided as a basis for comparison to the other alternatives. Impacts of maintaining the current mode of operation are well known.Weekly sludge line cleaning is done of the primary sludge lines and periodic manual removal of grease balls is done in the aerated grit chambers and bar screen influent channels. Increased FOG quantities will increase the frequency of maintenance already occurring and possibly require additional maintenance attention in the primate scum collection and pumping as well. Alternative 1B-D—On-site Treatment Using Anaerobic Digestion As described above,this alternative may be implemented in several different ways: each having its own impacts. Because the current practice of FOG treatment in the anaerobic digesters appears to BROWN Asa /q CALDWBLL pVo„&\«sd f�\« wmp trc,in=srLdvv-tuna repwtrn. November 20P Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 20 have no adverse process impact ies assumed that any variation of this alternative would have no adverse digestion process impact either. Alternative 2—Off-site Recycling at a Grease Rendering Facility This alternative would require additional equipment that would add complexity to the operation and maintenance of the plant. While removing FOG from the treatment system may have a beneficial impact on treatment process operation and maintenance,added tipping fees and costs due to loss of a valuable product,methane gas,may make this alternative less desirable. Traffic in the plant could be significantly increased. Because there would be no reduction in liquid volume,traffic to and from the site would double. Due to fluctuations in the market there could be significant economic risk associated with this alternative. Alternative 3—Off-site Recycling as a Bio-fuel This alternative could require a process to separate useable yellow grease from the grease trap waste. One of the bio-diesel companies has expressed an interest in siting a pilot facility for removing yellow grease at one of the treatment plants. If the BMPs currently being developed encourage separation of waste cooking oil from the rest of the FOG this alternative would be more desirable. Implementation of a pilot study for yellow grease separation and market analysis would require approximately six months to complete. Alternative 4—Off-site Disposal of FOG at a Landfill This alternative would requite some additional facilities that would increase the complexity of the operation and maintenance of the treatment facility. Combining solidified or concentrated FOG with grit and screenings would add another handling step that would complicate the disposal process and increase the amount of residuals hauled off site. Meeting the"paint filter" test for landfill disposal may also be difficult to accomplish. Table 4 provides a more detailed comparison of impacts of all four alternatives including the four variations of Alternative 1. Comparison of Alternatives Evaluation Criteria Weighting. To better define the relative importance of each criteria,a workshop was held on October 9,2002 with operations,compliance and source control staff(See figure 8 for evaluation matrix). In order of perceived importance by OCSD staff the impact criteria rated as follows from least important to most important: 1. Economic Impact 2. Environmental Impact 3. Staffing Impact BROWN AND CALDWELL p:\food.\oad fog\oc m-pl fog imps aport(A).d November 2002 4 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 21 4. Traffic Impact 5. Maintenance task Impact 6. Operations/process Impact Equw A B C D E F Doane % 2 3 3 3 2 A 1 1 1 1 1 5 13.0% 2 1 2 2 B i 1 1 1 6 16.0% 1 3 2 C 2 1 1 9 24.0% 2 2 D 1 1 7 18.0'A 2 E 1 11 29.0% XX F XX 10 26.0% In each hox.pno e a sure for the pertinent raderion when compared directly to the TOTAL 38 100.0% conesppWing cdlerian for Hut hax. 0=Insignificant 1 =Equal Significance;2=Slightly More Important:3=Slgnificently More Important Criteria Description A Operabana9Rocass Impacts B Malmenance Task Impacts C Sing Impacts D Traffic Impacts E Econo nir"e cycle Impacts F Fmiro enlal Imperils Figure 8. Evaluation Criteria Matrix Non-Monetary Comparison.The alternatives developed for treatment and disposal of FOG were compared based on the impacts to the treatment facility as noted above. The impact criteria factors were rated on a scale of 5 to 1 for each alternative with 5 being the most desirable and 1 being the least desirable. The basis of the rating was degree to which the OCSDneatment facility would be impacted. Table 3 shows a comparison of alternative factoring in the criteria weighting noted above. BROWN AND C A L D W E L L P:Vf \owl kq\ooa m-PWt fag unpxr snuck-foul r n(rq.dor November 2002 ofMgtC W.$T„ilnlinn nwm, IroPhm 1(](:Imnxl Smde P Te 4. CBmpm ofAllemamimp e.Mnxwu¢A. Nrt,n.Meu uttm.amu aummhe le AbmmkeW um,mxmf amm.a,<s avmvbea Smm Qm-'BmeCw` PMetlke POGkmiin6®1 Plotlifea POGBetY.inik Daha,ad Dlp®a GB¢IYTrt.mm,m RmN,lq pHlm P.els4ntn YbJbel IaN110ObtwY Dlpx.. aed Dlpxm P.tltl Ore.nwe rry.n, OEcvnn.lrcaobamrvi gvu•mormv'..m�e�y. Cprame(mvrtmsg Op,a.gdd<aNd�6m, flp,<nvnefrvw fCG vmg No,M1aq ie,mmn Q e.um. .v mon.4 a,0^,^Y..Jpxppe!(tl' a,Wau4+tl A^9"4n(IDf [mtivonp4.n<Y�m.v .udbr P'IW Lf^^4^,Y ORmm �,mae oP.,am,.rm.rm..mmY amswaE,,.,oE•unn mw. wmma,Nmtm,F,m oE..� rt.am.,m.a Clmq<iedR^4.dg NevFAWgrm<nm 14am'Ndp,m.p.¢gW CP„nm MmvNm.nad marnbv R.v w OYnm—f..A mm,wwwM1m, • kJm.0 l.J m.mmJ.Y Imm..el..aniJsum.Y mrt.w ml rm.,ml,.m kamNLM v.m.Y¢. . d<«o�w luNhgio4lmd • RnJ}impmea pAP Pb¢ap..mrninrvvm pMUYd Iad 4..vwLv pda,mxelunftY. Nc.tlamvA.LLLuenlo ,rta atlnmwmW.&N dE.rcr FmNermrvml • km.ml.e rm v.m.b,. }Immnme lrgxv . <ngwa.44V lmhasg ' kJm"tld$l.m,lnvg . R.deN,6tlElehamp • kL.N.WEMhnmB v k@aNaWErvehmy ' kJaW.W}eLrchvnp • Beemee}Jp4mh +^Y • Ne.h.4�n Pnm,mumn kdaeePmw,nm, . kdmea M^"^,mm . kd¢NPmumx,m kdvMP^nw uvn . RNm"tl Pnemvv, . PNwJP`^^lvva, . Ircrtatl,rcvla.ssAhaug p.rtsg pnpg p.,piry prgvg pmgny Mmxv¢<Mabm.,tl PrvkveJ,n,M1xA.leavg • kdina mvL.vvvJ.b.smP . Pyaa.dnrlu.,IMamq • kdrtM,rt.hmeJYeax�g kdeed,veh¢.eYekuma . kJ,ndm.M1xAv4vng Nem<,Pgnn.wmunAn K.e=mmw mwry b. Menmltlgun ln,mmr Neavw.g,aa mn ira,. aJimmm<ol�vvlexM A64imW x¢enryuYP� K.rtmiripmJ NVJmg ,Img m m,wlePdm, sm.Nlnl.n¢ sm,¢.,rr�re•e`g�nbm} IemJ}..rtn.a.m,m,].,m rom}......a,<Y.,..Ylr ro..a4 mrtnmm,mrt.,m sm¢nahN.k.E sYm.YB,Bm.m �m..wn,y=M1mE ,mrtmxohalaa.dumJ �n.r.,.a}dmBl,ax ,m.,lmyn x. m,mN¢nm,g;a¢ +mP+.a aeiw•+ Tn<a m,a¢nlara.¢ a:n.gaYM.w,J rr`. ear pw m<dk mm.m.rt,.mrtN I...anm...wmtm.ml ma Imrta.motBd.,Yb�Nw Im.n.aoxa.„rc„np,rt Imrta,aoe:u Yaln.r.rtrc E...mmnm,lm ere..ueatlmrawrtm aJnaaanm Pna,. atlnunm6Pvvrvu¢M agyin. eY�p,nn wef.eme Tr.Ba lrryn. lartveamniv udrr Ircaued Plar PTe,v,N& IrcrtW P�P^tn,Yafr[ Izrt.waPlmpatuvA( Fneaew Plu`Pmm.,^r!u rmnM.araumNva Immae to Wm P�^•mlf u mr fDG d.rprgha�m miwrCC emp,Nru�4f rcmFCC Lngny[N,fu • Js ie RY,p fimnrtMwg • proemmlh if,rohrm ,aEm rxy.. .mb�k.mmE km,.iY. • Pov6kfiaW[,an,.4Yg 4.a.N,Y4x kamml'tl..,. stl.,.ama nm„AR ktluva.YW pemdma kaaramaAwwmM1•• kd¢N�m,.a E,m•am. Im¢,,.e nnmARm,pam ImrtmN om,J&^m;d. m¢.<aa�w.ewmwam Pm<M1a.amro.mrcvea a.embno[deWs am msmaW mnnn¢ ntuum mku orm�M1OPmamm� ie Mef,rtilumryed,.w. mb.ynemaermirtvn a ..r�� la^emxm rmd.,m. vme.—� ABYmwiTPoYrn MWk vnu<dlmiwnm. .utl,w,eE.Bk Fa...<.ryn.m�rm M1e®.avp.x„a m.rm ImrtmN yn,.^s.m,w mrcm.artr,•n.Bm¢rm m�mm.rm,Bm s.wcbWn rtm,m,E w,l.ma aglm N,W,.mml CO.I..NYluP^A my,DG ,pg.vY emw4•x Cm��ennwedl,.nuM tadaM M<IemcM. ,mg • CgeYl mY fmne,r f<'I'da bkM.Ymaepgnmi . Aay,oml xmm Ggnle. . IrtrtmedertTrm,6rleaml • rtpinMbrtwdrva . Cy.I m,6ewfaililin e.wmnw a.�da..ma rm IngoM x¢I.rr.¢rt. Wo.aoniml,ndE,v, . kem,d wA,4nmmew.. B..a.m.alnv.• . 4.,...a.sPlnp ..¢,.J...p.B b.,.n.a,.,P1.N Irt.n<a o..b<.,.,.._.. .m. ro.m ka.xl.mkwm< .ud mhmnux Ircrt,vd,vlema.w In¢aad umlemnm Bnrc.N<Tvm aul}nmkB� wPaevl M,wlh R.da.tlluNB.yr�Y P.n.64•.'s.¢tlMromn Bmvn1.T^`• kmd.Tnm wb.el..k,gervq whhmti„el • Gmnnnp(mMnrn PM Babg a ) 5 a ] BROWN ats CALDYELL P ,...a Feb.•euMmi kvs�,ma.ga,mmlJN., w,wn M03 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 24 Actual project costs from similar wastewater projects,budget prices obtained from vendors,and cost curve data have been used to complete this analysis. A list of general economic and process assumptions for the treatment and disposal options is provided below. These assumptions,which are consistent with the recent advanced digestion study,include: • Electrical and control costs are equal to 12 percent and 20 percent of mechanical and structural modifications respectively. • Capital Cost mark ups: o Modification and coordination with existing facilities 10 percent o Contractor overhead and profit 15 percent O Permits,bonds, and insurance 2.5 percent o Estimator's contingency 40 percent o Saks tax 7.75 percent o Engineering and administrative Costs 30 percent o Markup for piping materials and installation in 15 percent the existing tunnel systems at Plants 1 due to congestion. Table 5.Alternative Capital Costs. (Millions) Alternative Capital Cost Alternative lA—Base Case (Status $ 5.7 Alternative IB—Modified FOG receiving Option 1 —tie in FOG line at digesters $ 1.1 Option 2—tie in FOG line at DAF feed $ 0.9 Alternative IC—Modified FOG receiving,thickened sludge blending $ 4.6 Alternative 1D—Dedicated digestion (Includes future digester cost) $ 4.8 (Without future digester cost $ .4 Alternative 2—Off-site treatment at se rendering facili $ 1.1 Alternative 3—Off-site recycling as bio-fuel Is 0 Alternative 4—Off-site disposal at landfill solid dis sal $ 3.1 Detailed capital cost estimates for each alternative are included in Appendix A. BROWN AND C A L D W B L L p;\y„d,\uod fug\ua Impl ,fq impurnudY 4.1 report(r).d. November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 25 RECOMMENDATIONS The seven alternatives developed for treating or disposing of FOG in the OCSD are: • Alternative 1—Onsite Digestion o Alternative lA—Base Case (Status Quo) o Alternative 1B—Modified Liquid Receiving o Alternative 1C—Modified Liquid Receiving and Thickening o AltemativelD—Dedicated Digestion • Alternative 2—Off-site treatment at a FOG rendering facilin- • Alternative 3—Off-site recycling as bio-fuel • Alternative 4—Off-site disposal at a landfill The alternatives were ranked based on various impacts to the OCSD treatment facility. The ranking results indicate that Alternative 3 ranked the best,followed by Alternatives 1D and B.Although Alternative 3 ranked the highest,the risk associated with Alternative 3 depends heavily on a third parts that curemtly is in the development stages. Brown and Caldwell recommends that Alternate D be implemented until pilot testing and market analysis of Alternative 3 is completed. To verify performance and process design requirements for dedicated digestion,a pilot test using grease trap waste should be performed. To inject FOG downstream of the digester heat exchanger some minor piping changes would be necessary. Until this work can be completed,the OCSD can continue its current practice of receiving FOG, Alternative IA. REFERENCES Ahdng,Birgittek,Environmental Biotechnology Lecture Notes,Lecture 10,University of California, Los Angeles,Spring 1998 Brown and Caldwell,FOG BMP Manual for Oregon 2000,Association of Clean Water Agencies, WNX¢V,omawa.org Brown and Caldwell,Grease Disposal Study for Wastewater Division,Department of Pubhc Works, County of Hawaii,October 1998 Bmwa and Caldwell,City of Kissimmee—Expansion of South Bermuda WRF 2000— Grease/Pumpout Receiving Station,May 2001 ■60WR AID C A L D W 9 L L y.\f a\a fag\�is-plot fi,,i xt stmY-caai. (r[) b November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 20 Chapelle,F,Groundwater Microbiology and Geochemistry, 1993 Joyce,Charles,P.E.,Brown and Caldwell,Grease Impact Assessment Rehabilitation Pilot Project County Sanitation District,Sacramento County,California,June 2000 Mehan,B,University Chemistry,Yd Ed,Chapter 18, 1975 Metcalf&Eddy,Wastewater Engineering Treatment/Disposal/Reuse,Y'Edition, 1991 OCSD,TPOD Annual report database,July 2000 to June 2001 Souza,Christine,"High energy prices send dairy industry into tailspin",Cahfonva Farm Bureau Federation Ag Alert,%�iw.clbfcom/agalen/1996-00/2000/aa-I220g.hnn,December 20, 2000 Streitwieset,Introduction to Organic Chemistry,Chapters 19,20,28,and 29,2s edition, 1981 Van Opstal,B.,M.E.,P.E.,Organic Resource Technologies Inc,et al,"Use of Fat,Oil and Grease Waste as an Agricultural Soil Conditioner",WEF 12'Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings,July 1998 BROWN Aso C A L D W B L L Wa' ^s�m=�,a.ar raw o ry.\(mda\orrd( \ard'v�-- ( �"(rpdor November?00_ APPENDIX A Alternative Capital Cost Estimates OCSO Grease impact study AllaflwtlyB CROII81 Coat 9atlmaW Wm uM0 r g.law l 1aW. ..••... Allemetleol-OMMu Ntlan e AlbmntlMDA-BNe CW EbXN -W 0 ]00M Glean ll"MnA me aWtl a -0' Inclutlln tlew t00W 200 S3.Ow.WO MOE ¢tlatln I xum collectlan nllawmw SSOp,Opp SYawtl EY 3350.00M.M0 MBtl nntl wwtllub vlN etlatln 0 CanbaM N mi. SO Mlx Cmtreclm MWkWa E175000 SUXbtel UM.7 0 C M;, .ald E$73,120 Ed Xbgffl blawame E10.n5 ENn tlu mM S1,170,00,Ws B pva rt .BnB.NB En mtl MmbllEaaWn EXT.E00 labl SS.711083 RountloE EatlmabOpft SS]W 000 AXmm�IA&BBRtlMNRecaIM r' • : alA ,seln Ilwrttll bn - um G.. ,,h -3W.. etl 2 E100.000 S2W.a00 Omm h000 E E15.OW 3MON Gruw lod ealna-O'Glan llneE 1000 E120 E1m.m Suablel E150.OW aUtl 91tl GpldLlabrAtll NO= Cm0olf 505000 FJm EO bll.ft CMIbcICr Mtllred V 9 S2a N $uMabl E18d.Bw000 GMXBCNwnama 3. Pennna.EOMa nntl Maloum $1 S1a 738]s0 EallmnlYamnu m�Ichin 513.$U2.M lEwm EnM nW MmMbWlkn MO 0naw low Etanase Round"Eatlmeb 31.1 W,000 nS-W IR �aaaflilb--BI OAFTutl GeaeewmFM ewlm- b am E E100.000 Sim MOO E wm ONeN OW 3 $1 MWO OreeN bBAFf GlaaelM1Mp BOO Y130 $T1.000 fiubblel E003,000 mtl ccBltlOwa vAbt egNn 30 2W Gonaeb Fl o,$ww80ectlitw EW Mlx CanEadv Intltrede $3110 6ubbtel E172.I40 ConVmbweTmtl $71121 $1I.W Edhal .wMAh bwlea2 E11.BSo EelesmswMln E1BB05$ Selea bK AV.ias En mwnn nntl nammlau9lm z Tow W SB25.735,]58 Rwnax Eaumfb seaB.BOB M10rmtl lG, WkV - Greewrecelvin 300g Rbm 3 SIOOAOO 00.000 HGm"MO m I -000 3 E15.000 EE0.000 OlehdW nlwW 1 E n.mW.M E850.000 BlhdW aee0 N ul ! 1 A020,000 5030.000 elmaetl4W ea Amm piong 1sW IEZOI)l S1OOA00 SUMaw s 00all, xib e wvtlMeb atlalb $IN,E150,000 C.W. $150.000 S mi. im Mlz GantraUor how. $ ,= 105000 buE1W01 W5 Gwtlectawemeetl 5050 3AN 50 PsmX9,bwtla and babes SSB.875 ales WxrN m m SBe2000 Sales elealn 5102515 En . mq MntlnlaXeXon E108,500 Baal SX.EBY,ISB Rounded Eellmeb EC.SOO.WO AXemetive 1O 0Miutitl ntlm WI bmmenttll uW AW Mow Ixsmonitl nM MOE' etlsW rNwletlon I n 1 lRil Y2,000 ell 5200 358 s110.000 e NM a2m S00 S50 $101000 el .lavela wN 140 $15 s2.100 ever-MElemelm' 1 $1.500.000 51,500000 suskeel stm.100 MM aN wNOlrelevAN slat to ConnA, $182210 Ebcmwl i8.B00 Mlx CmOecNr IMOe is S11f,94] BudNN s8241587 ConhaixdunlhddelS0BS,005 PNmNs,bond.andtle and kvu9nw Sf0,e07 Ealimvo'amml §U.972.4M W8 Salaam. I En MBgI and Mlltlnlvrvlon .Wk Mg IntlwoROentleo EcBNere 000Uxluded rM hom a¢011aletl al amn mr rw NendbeeA000M mq morhNlexlb BCNn 00DCanOMef0F M0tlo,000,0E0.]50 Pelrtva,kwgaentl Inwmnce 9 Sa000 Sal.W ids W En M AtlMnbb eflbn $i]sS00 TOW 511di 10 Rounded EaIInNN 51.100,000 Aftenddee3Msfte I w'MMuel wnle ell only), ":.4.. AllemetlVB9gFe0e pb Ie1teM811 a f00w emnk uamlq ,FOG mncmava 1 51000000 7.- f1,000.= Motl1F endwortlinve non etltlm m S100AW ConOMa f100A00 icn 5000,M. 000 C Mix mBeraN Intlhevf S]O.OoO tTtloNl SS]0000 CwNecla ouaawtl MAW 105flMaW tl Inwlwce 339 i50121.VS Sti1,$)5hOMnbOelbn Sd]1.Totel 390fi ai4 IS0,f00,000 Orange County Sanitation District 1 �\ FLED IN THE OFFICE&THE SECRETARY ORANGE 'nN DIBTRICT ~d MAR 2 6 2003 OY In - Plant FOG Impact Study w 7 c r Prepared by: November 2002 BROWN AND C A L D W E L L 16735 Von Kerman Avenue, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92606-4953 IN-PLANT FOG IMPACT STUDY Preparodjor. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT November 2002 Prepared by: BROWN AND CALDWELL 16735 Von Kansan Avenue,Suite 200 Q(10FESSIpN9 �� �H p �F Irvine, California 92606-4953 n� �F, D. (W 'Y 0.C '0 cniv �Tf.OF CAS\Fg- CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................._......_................................................................................I ProblemOverview.........._..................................................................................................._..............1 ProjectObjectives................................................................_.........................................._................_I BACKGROUND................................................................_.._............_..........................................................I FOG Composition,Sources,and Chemical Characteristics......................................._...._...........1 Methodfor Conducting Study...........................................................................................................3 RelatedStudies.............................................................................................................................._......4 FOGBest Management Practices Study..................._........................................................4 AdvancedDigestion Study....................................................................................................4 Project limitations and Assumptions................................_.............................................................4 FOGQuantities and Treatment........................................................................_.................4 FOGREMOVAL PRACTICES........_......................__....................._.............................__....._..................5 CurrentFOG Quantities.....................................................................................................................5 Current FOG Process Description....................................................................................................6 In-Plant FOG Impacts and Mitigation Measures............................................................................7 In-Plant FOG Impacts..............................................................................._......_.................7 In-Plant FOG Impact Mitigation..................................................._................._.................8 FutureFOG Collection Practices..................................................................................._.........._.....8 DEVELOPMENT OF PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES...................................8 Alternative lA—Base Case (Status Quo).......................................................................................10 Alternative 1B-D—On-site Treatment Using Anaerobic Digestion..........................................10 Alternate 1B—Modified FOG Receiving and Digestion...............................................I I Alternate 1C—Modified FOG Receiving,Thickening and Digestion........_...............15 Alternate 1D—Dedicated Digestion..........................................................._....................16 Alternative 2—Off-site Treatment at a Grease Rendering Facility............_..............................17 Alternative 3—Off-site Recycling as a ISio-fuel.............................................................................17 Alternative4—Landfill Disposal............................................................................................._......18 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES...................................................................................._...............19 Alternative IA—Base Case (Status Quo).................................................._...................................19 Alternative iB-D—On-site Treatment Using Anaerobic Digestion..........................................19 Alternative 2—Off-site Recycling at a Grease Rendering Facility..............................................20 Alternative 3—Off-site Recycling as a Bio-fuel.............................................................................20 Alternative 4—Off-site Disposal of FOG at a Landfill................_.............................................20 Comparisonof Alternatives..............................................................................................................20 EvaluationCriteria Weighting..........................._................................................................20 Non-Monetary Comparison...................._.........................................._..............................21 CapitalCost Comparison........................_....................................._........................_.........22 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................._..........................................................................2.5 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................25 DROWN AND CALDWELL p:\fwda\ood for\end m,b toe lmpx. N..b.2002 CONTENTS (continued) TABLES Ns: P3>se Table 1 OCSD FOG Hauler Sample Summary...............................................................................3 Table 2. FOG Collection Companies.................................................................................................6 Table 3. Evaluation of Alternatives...................................................................................................22 Table 4. Comparison of Alternate Impacts......................................................................................23 Table 5. Alternative Capital Costs.....................................................................................................24 FIGURES Its rut There are three other figures in the report that need to be labeled and included in this table of figures: Figure1. Typical Grease Trap...............................................................................................................2 Figure 2. Alternative IA—Base Case (Status Quo)............................................................................9 Figure 3a. Packaged FOG Receiving System......................................................................................I I Figure 3. Alternative 1B—Combined Digestion with Primary Sludge or WAS..........................12 Figure 4. Alternative 1C—Combined Digestion FOG,Pnmaq•Sludge&WAS with Preheating..............................................................................................................................13 Figure 5. Alternative ID—Dedicated Digestion..............................................................................14 Figure 6. Heated Sludge Blending Tank Schematic.........................................................................15 Figure 7. Advanced Digestion Schematic..........................................................................................16 Figure 8. Evaluation Criteria Matrix...................................................................................................21 BROWN A N D CALDWELL pgfwidn\msd \md in- lAAA fa pw ap p g impact amd���Imd rc t rl .do[ November 2002 INTRODUCTION Problem Overview The Orange County Sanitation Distort(OCSD) serves the northwest and central regions of Orange County,treating wastewater from 21 different cities and 3 special districts that have a combined population of approximately 2.4 million. Flows treated by the two OCSD wastewater treatment plants,Plant 1 and Plant 2,come from sources including residential,commercial,recreational and industrial users. As the OCSD sever collection system has grown,there has been an incensing awareness of the impact that fats,oils and grease (FOG)have on the proper operation of the collection system. FOG builds up in layers in the gravity sewers and collects m manholes. This has the effect of reducing available sewer capacity,and can ultimately result in blocked lines causing sewage system overflows(SSOs). For this reasoq the OCSD is developing a plan to reduce the amount of FOG discharged into the sewage collection system. Project Objectives This project addresses conditions for renewal of OCSD's Waste Discharge Permit order Number R8-2002-0014 issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board,(RWQCB). The objectives of this project are to evaluate disposal options for fats,oil and grease (FOG)generated in the sewer system service area and assess in-plant impacts of these disposal options. Disposal options considered include use of existing anaerobic digestion and other off-site recycling methods. Brown and Caldwell has been retained as a pan of its WDR support contract,to (1)develop a plan to evaluate the feasibility of digesting FOG in existing anaerobic digesters and(2)assess alternate methods of recycling FOG,grease rendering and other disposal alternatives,including land filling, etc,within current codes and permit requirements.The purpose of this study is to identify altemanve disposal and recycling options for handling FOG m the future and assess in-plant impacts of receiving greater quantities of FOG. BACKGROUND FOG Composition,Sources,and Chemical Characteristics FOG present in wstewater is composed of animal fats,vegetable fats,and food solids of varying densities,and water and petmi om based oils and grease. Food based fats and grease are commonly discharged from restaurants and other food preparation facilities. Two common discharges of this type of FOG are in the form of waste cooking oil and grease ttap waste. Petroleum-based oils and grease are tyo,*.discharged by businesses such as automotive repair facilities,gas stations and car washes. Petroleum-based FOG is relatively simple to regulate and control through industrial discharge and pretreatment permits. Food-based FOG is more difficult to control because of the large number of restaurants and fast food establishmenm The focus of this report evaluates the BROWN AND C A L D W B L L P:V-&\end fnNb m-Watt fas 6�R+"'d! Vl)d November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Smdv 2 impact of the FOG that would be controlled under new BMPs from restaurants and other food establishments. Fats,whether food-based or petroleum-based,can be saturated or unsaturated and can be in either liquid or solid form. Because FOG is composed of materials of varying densities,generally less dense than water,it separates easily into several lavers floating on the water when placed in a quiescent vessel like a grease trap or a grease interceptor(See Figure 1). Because of this natural tendency to float,when combined with other solids such as primary solids or waste activated sludge, FOG can provide an adhering effect that will capture these solids and float them as well. Until the densigv of the combined grease and solids is equal to or greater than water,this combined mass will float. This effect is like a reverse shear floc process which is used in water treatment—in a DAF the floc matrix moves upward and collects (or shears) particles,incorporating air and solids in a matrix This adhering effect can be beneficial to the DAF thickening process. uamTAKE LOCKANDLFT ttrANWT VENT RMC A INLET OUTLET Y y L W .0 sMNPLE REGULAATT ORY OBG POINT DEVICE ACCUMULATION j MR RELIEF REMOVABLE bATFLEb 1 SOLIDS ACCUMULATION Figure 1. Typical Grease Trap FOG from animal fats contains esters (compounds of alcohol) or glycerol (glycerin) and lipids (phospholipids). Phospholipids have long nonpolar"tails"and a small highly polar"head". Although FOG molecules contain both polar and nonpolar components they are generally considered to be polar. FOG that is petroleum-based is nonpolar in nature. Lipids,including phospholipids, are generally defined by biochemists as compounds that,upon hvdrolysis (addition of water),will produce fain-acids. FOG faro acids are generally longer chain molecules. In an anaerobic environment,these longer chain fatty acids are metabolized by hydrogen-producing acetogenic bacteria. Acid-loving (acetogenic,acetophilic) bacteria consume long chain farm acids to produce Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA),commonly acetate. Methanogens,in min consume VFAs to produce methane,etc.,resulting in the formation of hydrogen,acetate, formate and carbon dioxide. One of the important end products from metabolism of these products is methane To verify chemical characteristics of FOG being hauled to the Plant I dumping station,samples were collected on three separate days from randomk selected FOG hauler. Results of this sampling are summarized in Table 1 B R O W N A K r C A L D W R L L rv\tIM�E+ulK.at \IKNt b- Inlf "l; r Ra�^TxI.IuJY.rwl nron btl.ya. November?002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 3 Table 1—OCSD FOG Hauler Sample Summary Sample Date Chromium m /I' TS% VS% PH June 10,2002 0.49 Data? 6.2 6.85 June 12,2002 0.69 6.06 6.85 June 13,2002 0.37 6.77 5.48 Average 0.52 6.34 6.39 ' Chmmium was semmmetded by OCSD source control stiff as an indicator for beavy metals. Chromium is not an element that is found commordy in wastewater,which make it a good indicator. Method for Conducting Study Brown and Caldwell collected and reviewed data in order to develop alternatives for handling FOG and assessing in-plant impacts of FOG treated on-site. Infomution sources include: • OCSD staff and plant data • Brown and Caldwell archives and other related literature (see references for other related literature used in preparation of this report) • Statement from commercial reryclers,rendering and landfill disposal companies • FOG samples collected from random FOG haulers and analyzed for volatile solids,total suspended solids,pH and total chromium(as an indicator for heavy metals). Future samples may want to he analyzed for copper since copper sulfate,when found in septic tanks,is commonly seen as an indicator of a mixed load. A kickoff meeting was held in June 2002 to define some of the process issues related to on-site treatment of FOG and establish evaluation criteria. This meeting also served as a brain stomting session to begin to develop alternatives. Dedicated anaerobic digestion was introduced as an alternative by OCSD staff as a result of bench scale testing that had been performed many years before. Alternatives have been developed for both on-site and off-site disposal options. These alternatives address the issues noted in the Waste Discharge Pemvt renewal requirements. Capital cost estimates have been prepared for each alternative for economic comparison. A non-economic comparison of each alternative has been made based on criteria established at the kick off meeting held with OCSD staff. These criteria included: Operational/process impacts, maintenance task impacts,staffing impacts,traffic impacts,economic/liferycle impacts and environmental impacts. A workshop was held on October 9,2002 with OCSD staff to determine which impacts hold greater weight,then rank each alternative by evaluating them and summing the weighted values for each evaluation criteria. When OCSD confirms selection of a preferred alternative an implementation schedule will be developed. BROWN AND C A L D W B L L p:\f adn\mad fag\«din-prom fag impact November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 4 Related Studies Orange County FOG Control Study. A parallel study is being conducted by another engineering firm under contract to the OCSD by Environmental Engineering and Contracting,Inc. to investigate ways FOG can be controlled at the source and keep FOG from entering the collection system. They will be developing Best Management Practices (BMPs) and evaluating chemicals or other materials that break down FOG,as well as other new technologies. Phase I of this investigation is scheduled for completion by February 2003 with a subsequent Phase 2 study dependant on the results of Phase 1. To mitigate SSO's and other operational challenges,it is important that a comprehensive pretreatment ordinance,enforcement and grease trap sizing be implemented. Future FOG quantities collected and disposed of at the Plant No. 1 will likely increase as a result of implementing any new ordinances. Advanced Digestion Study. Brown and Caldwell recendy prepared a report for OCSD that evaluated alterative advanced anaerobic digestions methods. That report has been used for background data relative to digester performance,digester capacity and future digester expansion needs. To simplify digester feeding and provide homogeneous solids loading to the digesters, Brown and Caldwell proposed a heated solids blending tank that would blend primary solids and thickened waste activated sludge. One of the alternative advanced digestion processes recommended was a series thermophilic/tuesophilic arrangement. This blending tank would also serve as a "wet well" to feed the digesters and provide a place for heat recovery from the thermophilic phase of digestion prior to the mesophilic phase. The thermophilic phase operates at approximately 135 e F and the mesophilic phase operates at approximately 95 ° F. To cool the sludge going from the thermophilic digester to the mesophilic digester,sludge cooling heat exchangers would recapture heat energy. Since the recommendations of the Advanced Digestion Study have not been adopted vet by the OCSD,it is assumed that the current mesophilic mode of digestion will continue for several mom years. Project Limitations and Assumptions FOG Quantities and Treatment. The OCSD Strategic Plan written in 1999 only addressed FOG that enters the plant under normal flow via the collection system This present study supplements the 1999 plan to address process and other impacts on the treatment plants as a result of FOG quantities diverted from entering the collection system and discharged directly at the treatment facility. The future FOG load being diverted from the collection system could vary from 45,000 to 180,000 gallons a day or 30 to 120 trucks per day assuming an average truck size of 1,500 gallons. This estimate assumes FOG is collected from approximately 7500 restaurants with 750-gallon FOG interceptors pumped out from 2 to 12 times per year. Typically-restaurants will have their interceptors pumped out when business is slow or when they are closed. This could result in peak FOG flows which are considerably higher than average,and occurring on Mondays or Tuesdays when some restaurant are closed. The BMP study is intended to reduce FOG flow entering the sewer collection system through the use of FOG interceptors,me of chemicals or enzymes to break down FOG or other FOG reduction methods. Recommendations from that study will be given to OCSD and contributing BROWN AND C A L D W B L L f"s\«w b-vW,fa8 s,vdY-r.i�„(.m).d. November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 5 agencies to pass ordinances to control the discharge of FOG to the collection system. Installation of FOG interceptors and periodic inspection of these interceptors will ensure that they are being properly maintained and pumped out. This in-plant FOG impact study assumes that future FOG ordinances would be passed requiring FOG interceptors and FOG being hauled to the OCSD dumping station. This would result in the greatest impact to the plant site. Since the BMP study will not be completed until the beginning of 2003,no estimate is available currently for future FOG quantities in the collection system A gross estimate of increased FOG quantities could be assumed to be parallel to the projected wastewater flow growth rate of 40/6 used in the OCSD Strategic Plan. Increase future FOG quantities being hauled is assumed to be a direct result of number of restaurants in business and improved compliance and enforcement of any FOG ordinance issued as a result of the BMP study. The on-going BMP study will include projections of FOG quantities diverted from the sewer system as a result of implementing various BMP plans When a more accurate estimate of FOG delivered to the treatment facility is available,the number used in this study will need to be revised. Future FOG quantities play a small part in development of treatment and disposal alternatives. Future FOG quantities only factor in to the assessment of in-plant impacts on various processes that may be called upon to treat the FOG.Alternatives utilizing existing anaerobic digestion capacity will not be impacted because there is substantial excess digester capacity and FOG quantities are small in relation to projected future sludge flows. As noted above, depending on how well the BMP plan is implemented and enforced, truck traffic both inside and outside the plant could be significantly impacted. Since Plant No. 1 has the facility to received Ducked FOG,on-site treatment of FOG will be limited to Plant 1 where the FOG haulers currently discharge their loads with the exception of Alternative 1A that continues cument disposal practices. FOG REMOVAL PRACTICES Current FOG Quantities Currently,several FOG haulers throughout the OCSD collect FOG from existing grease traps. OCSD Operations staff reported that most FOG collected is not mixed with other liquid waste such as septage,however,some mixed loads do coax in from time to tithe. Companies that collect and are permitted to discharge FOG are listed in Table 2. Some of these FOG haulers also handle septage. Typically,FOG hauler trucks have a capacity of approximately 1,500 gallons as regulated by CalTrans and local road weight limits. Plant 1 typically receives 27 trucks a day or approximately 40,000 gallons per day. As noted in this table,two of the pennitted FOG haulers are also FOG processors (rendering companies). B BOWN AND CALDWELL p.\f da\w fi[g\«ad im to uk final porc(rq.m N..ber 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Platt FOG Impact Study 6 Table 2. FOG Collection Companies Permit Number Waste Hauler 2 Orange County Septic 5 Inland Pumping 29 Minuteman Pumpmg 34 The FOG Com /Baker Commodities (Rendering company) 52 Primer Processors 92 R ker Commodities 117 DarlingInternational (Ftendentisr com Ctrrrent FOG Process Description Liquid waste (septage) and FOG are presently disposed of at a dumping station located at the north end of Plant 1 adjacent to the Ellis Avenue entrance. Haulers enter the plant at this location,drop off a copy of their manifest outside the plant gate,then proceed to the drooping station. The dumping station can accommodate two trucks at a time in two separate waste hookups. Each waste hookup has a solid metal cover over a 4-inch quick connect fitting. When a haulers aiave at the dump station,they connect one end of their discharge hose to their truck and the other end to the quick-connect fitting at the dump station and finally open their discharge valve allowing the load to flow by gravity. All trucks are equipped with reversible pumps that can vacuum the waste from grease traps and pressurize the tank to discharge faster or discharge into a receiving tank Operations staff reported that an occasional load of spoiled olive oil is received from a local olive processing facility. The haul truck's reversible pump can be used to discharge this spoiled olive oil directly into a digester through a pipe fitting on the cleaning hatch on the side of the digester. FOG-laden wastewater is typically discharged fiom the haul truck at the dumping station and flows to the influent diversion structure by gravity.City water is used to flush the solids along the line, similar to flushing a toilet. At the diversion structure,the FOG is diverted to Plant 2. Operations staff reported that there is sufficient flow in the trunk line to Plant 2 to prevent FOG from coating this line. Figure 2 shows a schematic of current base case FOG treatment practices. At the diversion structure the discharged FOG combines with other wastewater flow and proceeds through the normal treatment process at Plant 2. Some FOG has a tendency to form grease balls and chunks that are removed mechanically at the barscreens or manually removed at the acrated grit tanks. After screening and degritting at the headworks,floatable material is removed in the primary sedimentation tanks by the scum collection system The collected scum consists of the FOG that was dumped by the FOG haulers as well as FOG transported to the plant from the wastewater collection system The scum is periodically pumped and combined with primary sludge. This mixture then flows to the anaerobic digester;. Grease present in the scum/primary sludge has a tendency to coat the primary sludge lines. Consequently constrictions in the pipe results in higher head loss,which reduces flow to the digesters. To alleviate this problem,parallel bypass piping has been provided to allow for periodic steam cleaning of the primary sludge line. DROWN AND C A L D W R L L vmmt,r�a t road N. i t Rro.�c,il.do< November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 7 Operations staff indicated that gas production at the digesters increases somewhat when FOG, mixed in with the primary sludge,reaches the digesters,although no specific data was provided. The City of Oxnard which uses similar methods for receiving FOG has cited a figure of approximately an additional 50 cubic feet of methane gas per 1,400-gallon truckload of FOG. Unless a digester is well mixed and has a way of removing surface floating material,digesters have a tendency to form mats at the top from a combination of hair,rags and scum. Operations staff reported that there is not a noticeable problem with matting in the anaerobic digesters. This would imply that the existing digesters have adequate mixing or good scorn removal or both and are suitable for treating FOG discharged at the treatment plant. In-Plant FOG Impacts and Mitigation Measures In-Plant FOG Impacts. Depending on how and where FOG enters the treatment system,there can be greater or lesser degrees of impacts on the plant process operation and maintenance. FOG that enters the treatment system at the head of the plant would have the greatest impact effecting each process it goes through. Because of its natural tendency to float,FOG would separate easily in aerated grit tanks and primary sedimentation tanks. Grease balls that form in these locations may need to be manually removed when surface skimming equipment isn't provided such as aerated grit chambers. Primary scum troughs and scorn pumping pits can also become clogged with grease as well. just as FOG can plate gravity sewer lines in the collection system, FOG can also coat and clog conveyance pumping systems and the plant piping. This can result in more frequent maintenance of sludge pumps and piping to remove FOG plated on equipment. Typically,lines that convey FOG are small in size (4 to 6 inches) and are routed behind larger piping. This arrangement makes these lines less accessible for cleaning and could result in less frequent maintenance. The number of joints,bends and elevation changes of lines conveying FOG can also have a negative effect on FOG accumulation. joints and fittings are generally grooved and gasketed which provide an ideal for grease to get"caught on". When the ultimate treatment process to handle FOG is anaerobic digestion,the distance between the point of application and the digesters is also a contributing factor to plating FOG on pipelines. Odors can also be a major consideration,especially in Southern California where warmer temperature prevails. The greatest odor problems will occur during cleaning operations because these lines and equipment are generally inside buildings or pipe tunnels that need to be properly ventilated. Implementation of a BMP program to reduce the amount of FOG entering the collection system may increase the quantity of FOG being collected and hauled to Plant No. 1. As mentioned earlier, this could result in over 100 trucks per day delivering FOG to the dumping station or other discharge point. Traffic both on and off site could be significantly impacted by tine increased number of trucks. BROWN AND C A L D W B L L p;U.&\sod tag\vnd to-pl.,fog i ......d�-awl rcNn(rq.dvc November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 8 In-Plant FOG Impact Mitigation. There are several ways to mitigate the impacts described above. Selection of the discharge point for FOG is an important factor to consider when developing alternatives for treating FOG on-site. As noted above,FOG that is discharged at the head of the plant would have the greatest impacts on the treatment system. To avoid clogging primary scum collection and pumping systems,changes to increase the capacity of tipping troughs and surface sprays may be needed. Hot water sprays may also be advisable. As with thickened sludge lines,glass-lined steel piping has proven to be the most resistant to accumulations. Making individual pieces of pipe as long as possible to reduce joints would lessen the sites that grease could be caught on. Providing dedicated steam lines for cleaning is advisable as well as placing cleanouts in places that are easily accessible would facilitate more efficient maintenance. Reducing the distance between the application point and the digesters will reduce the possibility of FOG plating. To maintain the "food produce'classification of FOG,it should be kept separate from other waste streams (septage,primary sedimentation and secondary clarifier scum lines,grit and screening wash water lines). The sole purpose of doing this would be to allow the plant the option of contracting with a rendering contractor to remove it and allow them to recycle or treat it. The cost of this `insurance"would be a"rock solid"way to ensure the plant's ability to handle a wide array of possibilities. The surest way to reduce the amount of odors is to keep the FOG contained,have direct connection to odor collection equipment where FOG is discharged and arrange for portable odor control facilities during maintenance activities. Traffic impacts could be mitigated by having a separate entrance dedicated for FOG deliveries only. The entrance could also be equipped with a card reader to control access and document loads as they enter the plant site. Careful consideration of other traffic patterns on the plant site as well as truck staging will reduce the impact of increased truck traffic. Future FOG Collection Practices As noted earlier,the OCSD is in the process of developing a BMP program to reduce the amount of FOG being discharged into the sewer collection system in an effort to reduce sewer system overflows (SSO)s. This program may result in an increased amount of FOG diverted from the collection system and disposed of at the OCSD treatment facility. DEVELOPMENT OF PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES Processing and disposal alternatives for FOG received directly at the OCSD treatment plants are developed and discussed below. Impacts associated with their implementation are addressed in a subsequent section of this report. Each alternative assumes compliance with new FOG ordinances passed as a result of the BMP study. OCSD source control staff indicated that any alternative that brings FOG on site must include a card access system for plant entry control and load documentation. A separate gate for FOG haulers may also be considered. Alternatives that have been developed include: BROWN AND CALDWELL pAfo�da\acd fog\oast implant 6g impact amd,-6d.gwn(d).dor November 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CURRENT F.O.G. TREATMENT FOG DIVERSION STRUCTURE HAULER PLANT I PLANT 2 SCREENING AERATED GRIT REMOVAL PRIMARY PRIMARY SLUDGE PRIMARY EFFLUENT SEDIMENTATION (TO SECONDARY TREATMENT) SCUM & FOG SCUM 4 PUMPS a DIGESTER GAS (TO COGENT �Rsronc DEWATERING THICKENED WAS Gas" ALTERNATIVE IA BASE CASE (STATUS DUO) BROWN AND SCALE s NONE 22160 C A L D W E L L GRexu CMTY SWRATpR Y6TRCT FIGURE 2 FAG.1RUTCNT ALIEMATW BAN DIBGO.CALIFORNIA 1 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 10 IA. Base use—status quo (continue current practices of receiving FOG and disposal) 1B -D. On-site treatment using anaerobic digestion 2. Off-site recycling at a grease rendering facility 3. Off-site recycling as a bio-fuel 4. Off-site landfill disposal Alternative 1A—Base Case (Status Quo) This alternative would continue receiving FOG at the existing dumping station,removing FOG and scum at the primary sedimentation tanks,pump it to the digesters with the primary sludge and anaerobically digesting it. Divert other waste oils,such as waste olive oil or cooking oil,directly to a digester (partial implementation of Alternative 1D). New glass lined piping is recommended to replace existing primary sludge piping. As noted in the mitigation measures discussed earlier upgrades to the scum collection system may be required to reduce expected increased maintenance. The plant would also continue their maintenance procedure of switching to a parallel primary sludge line while the other line is steamed cleaned. Increased maintenance of these sludge pipes is expected with the increased FOG quantities delivered to the site. Some change to traffic control or receiving schedules may be needed to accommodate increased truck traffic on City streets. Altemative 1B-D—On-site Treatment Using Anaerobic Digestion These alternatives would modify the current processing of FOG in the anaerobic digesters and assumes that the existing digesters are adequate to handle FOG without modifications. Possible variations of this alternative would include: 1B Modified FOG Receiving and Digestion(See Figure 3 for schematic) -Receive FOG at a new dumping station located closer to the digesters,pumping it to the digesters after the digester heat exchanger followed by anaerobic digestion. Injection at this point would liquefy the grease solids and reduce the possibility of fouling the heat exchangers. Locating a dedicated dumping station closer to the digesters would reduce the plating of FOG on the sludge feed lines. 1C Modified FOG Receiving,WAS thickening and Digestion (See Figure 4 for schematic) -Receive FOG at a new dumping station closer to the digesters,pumping it to the DAF thickener aftertldckening followed by anaerobic digestion. ID Dedicated Digestion (see Figure 5 for schematic) -Pumping FOG directly into a dedicated digester followed by anaerobic digestion. A discussion of each variation is further described below. BROWN AND CALDWELL p:V d.\«W f%\«,d m-pl t tog imp.„W,-r.1 rc ,t(,).mc November 2002 Orange Con ty Sanitation District 11 In-Plant FOG Impact Study Altemate 1B—Modified FOG Receiving and Digestion.This alternative would involve the following new structures and equipment: 1. New receiving station with coarse solid/grit removal and FOG pumping located along the East Perimeter road north of Secondary Clarifier 2. Figure 3a shows a typical FOG pretreatment system. 030 ' ammo iL aa.a Figure 3a. Packaged FOG Receiving System Note: The FOG receiving system shown above may be equipped with an automated logging system to keep track of loads and haulers for billing purposes. Grit,rocks and other material would be scrolled up an inclined screening channel and dewatered prior to dumping in a roll off container. The new receiving station could be covered with foul air withdrawal and treatment to reduce odor control needs. 2. Glass lined ductile iron FOG distribution piping to existing digesters in existing pipe trenches. B R 0 W N A x n CALDWELL p: „,�eo,«vl i^e�M:rim-pwv tn�impaa:�wi� fim�mp e.�1�0+�K Novemk,2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT U.G. TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES FOG HAULER 1 NEW FOG PRETREATMENT ROUGH SCREENING GRIT & ROCK REMOVAL OPTION I OPTION 2 PRIMARYJC10GENT) WAS SEDIMENTATION PRIMARY ANED SLUDGE IT ALTERNATIVE IB - COMBINED DIGESTION WITH PRIMARY SLUDGE OR WAS B R O W N AND SCALE i NONE 22160 C A L D W E L L ;r� ORMU CMTr UNTITMN MTMCT FIGURE 3 1A 1 T4 T &19i WE BAN DIEGO.CALIFORNIA 1 —RAiJ(:F COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT F ^ TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES FOG HAULER 1 NEW FOG PRETREATMENT ROUGH SCREENING GRIT & ROCK REMOVAL PRIMARY THICKENED PRIMARY SLUDGE BLENDING WAS DAF WAS SEDIMENTATION TANK THICKENING HEX DIGESTER GAS (TO COGEN) BLENDED SLUDGE AND FOG TO DEWATERING ALTERNATIVE IC - COMBINED DIGESTION FOG, PRIMARY SLUDGE & WAS WITH PREHEATING �C$H[ BROWN AND SCALE i NONE 2216D C A L D W E L L FIGURE 4 Wwc.l= MMM C00TT SAWTAIM U6TWCT SAN DMW CALIFORNIA TATw,R[AT11WT ALIEMAme 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT F.O.G. TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES DIGESTER GAS (TO COGEN) FOG HAULER DEDICATED DIGESTER GAS FOG (TO COGEN) DIGESTER PRIMARY SLUDGE TWAS COMIXED DEWATERING DIGESTER ALTERNATIVE ID - DEDICATED DIGESTION FlIW6, FUYtIt W,E B R O W N AND SCALE s NONE 22160 C A L D W E L L ^�� FIGURE 5 IEC,TtJw oxra[ COMTT S MUTON p6TKT rno I ATY T KIEMAU BAN OISOO.CALIFORNIA 1 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 15 Alternate IC—Modified FOG Receiving,Thickening and Digestion.This alternative would involve the following new structures and equipment 1. New receiving station with coarse solid/grit removal,odor control and FOG pumping located along the East Perimeter road south of Secondary Clarifier 2 adjacent to the DAFs. 2. Heated sludge blending tank(heat to approximately 85° F) to receive raw Primary sludge,thickened WAS and FOG. Figure 6 shows a heated sludge blending schematic. 3. Glass lined ductile icon FOG piping to new heated blending tank,blended sludge pumps and piping to digesters. Heated Blending tank Anaerobic Digester ftma sludW,Nick WAS Wen sdldsand and FOGW76tl F FOG@85ftF 88tlpF eBMDF Heat Exchanger Heat Exchanger N..TeMenaae,,hown m rtp,e,en,,he amcya of,aw,ludge prchenting. Acnul iempemmm,ma�.an. Figure 6. Heated Sludge Blending Tank Schematic The heated sludge blending structure will contain one shell and tube heat exchanger,centrifugal sludge pumps and sludge grinders (if chopper pumps ate not used for raw solids circulation). This heated sludge blending tank would add a small amount to the heat load for mesophilic digestion due to some heat losses at the blending tank.The heat load at the digesters would be less because the incoming sludge would be preheated prior to digestion. If advanced digestion is implemented in the future,it could be used As a part of heat recovery following thermophilic digestion. Figure 7 shows a possible advanced digestion schematic. BROWN AND C A L D W B L L PM.da\x tog -anm m)nn in).aar November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 16 Heated Blending tank Thermephilic Mesophllic Anaerobic Digester Anaerobic Digester eHm.ry eaae..mivanm W.A.s eN .e aale..ne .narocQMaMI 1.1@nd,F es gent wnpF Sludge b Sludge Hot Water Hog Exchanger Meet PJlD,.n,., Nm:Tcmparneaws shwas m mpmscot the concord of mw sludge p chating. Ace al rempemmm may vary. Figure 7. Advanced Digestion Schematic Alternate 1D—Dedicated Digestion.This alternative would involve using Digester 7 for dedicated anaerobic digestion. Digesters 5 and 6 are currendy used for sludge holding prior to dewatering and Digester 8 currently doesn't have adequate automation to make it suitable for this alternative. Operations staff indicated that a bench scale pilot test of this alternative was performed about 20 years ago,but no data was kept from that test. This pilot test was fed exclusively from scum box material. They stated that it took about 2 weeks for the process to be established,but solids destruction and gas production continued thereafter. Once the culture was established digestion became rapid. About 65%of volatile solids in raw sludge digestion is converted to gas. Because of the high level of volatile solids destroyed,very little sludge production is expected. However, there is no empirical data to support this assumption. Before this alternative would be implemented,it would be wise to conduct this pilot test again using samples taken from FOG haulers to determine process performance and other design considerations. FOG could be pumped directly into the existing digester via a nozzle connection located on the removable access hatch located near ground level or injected downstream of the existing heat exchanger. Operations staff stated that waste olive of had been received in this mamer in the past. It would be preferable to inject the FOG downstream of the heat exchanger to ensure the FOG is in liquid form when it enters the digester. No modifications to the existing digester are anticipated, however some paving and drainage modifications may be necessary to facilitate increased traffic flow in the area and capture possible liquid spills. Injection downstream of the heat exchanger would require some piping modifications to the sludge recirculation piping. BROWN AND CALDWELL p.\(wdda\.d fug\—c in-plain fog impact arudy.anal depun(A).doc Nodcmber 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 17 Alternative 2—Off-site Treatment at a Grease Rendering Facility FOG rendering is a process that converts animal processing wastes,including bone and fat,into usable products such as soap,cosmetics and animal feed. FOG collected from grease traps may also be recycled in this manner as a raw feed material. As noted earlier,Baker Commodities,one of the FOG haulers fisted in Table 3,is one of the largest rendering facility operators in the Los Angeles area. Baker Commodities and Darling International indicated that there may not be sufficient capacity at their facility to handle all the FOG and that the tipping fee would be between 11 and 15 cents a gallon. An article published by the Farm Bureau Federation dated December 20,2000' described the crisis that faced the agriculture industry as a fallout of the national energy crisis. Rendering facilities use natural gas to heat slaughterhouse byproducts to separate the solids,liquids and fat. Skyrocketing gas and electricity prices could make the rendering business economically unfeasible or they will have to pass on these increased operating costs to their customers. One solution to this crisis could be using yellow grease,as a bio-fuel to run the boilers at the plant. If OCSD chose this alternative,they may be forced to raise their dumping fee to offset the cost of disposal in this manner. Currently OCSD charges FOG haulers 3.5 cents a gallon to discharge at the treatment plant. Adding the war of the rendering plant tipping fee of up to 15 cents per gallon would increase the cost of dumping at the treatment facility to 500%of the current cost. These costs may vary significantly due to changes in the market,making cost control for this alternative difficult to predict. This may have an adverse effect on the FOG haulers and may discourage collection of grease trap wastes. Implementation of this alternative would involve constructing a storage tank at the plant to allow rendering companies to withdraw FOG waste for subsequent hauling to the rendering facility. If the rendering facility will not provide FOG waste pickup,OCSD would either have to contract this hauling operation to another FOG hauler or enter the hauling business at additional expense. Because there would be no reduction in liquid volume the amount of truck traffic to and from the site would double. Alternative 3—Off-site Recycling as a Bio-fuel In response to the worldwide energy crisis,to reduce the United States'dependence can foreign fuels, and to promote a cleaner environment,the US government has provided incentives for development of other clean renewable fuel sources. One product that has emerged in the last decade is dean-burning bio-fuel called bio-diesel,produced from recycled vegetable oils. Bio-diesel has physical and chemical properties very similar to petroleum diesel. However,because it is non-toxic,biodegradable and essentially free of sulfur and carcinogenic benzene,it produces a significantly improved emissions profile. In addition, the additional oxygen in bio-diesel improves 'Souza,Christine,"High enert,.y prices send dairy industry into tailspin",California Farm Bureau Federation Ag Alen, ,x Pofcom/y,nlm/1996- 012000/ +.1'10L htm,December 20,2000 BROWN AND C A L 13 W B L L Pareaaa�«.a r�� m-plant rea imgry nudefiiul spun trq.d« November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 18 combustion and makes for a significantly cleaner bum. Bio-diesel is a very effective fuel additive nixing readily with petroleum diesel. In a 20%blend with diesel,emissions are significantly reduced. Pacific Biodiesel located in Hawaii has reported using 100%biodiesel with no reduction in engine performance. No engine modifications are needed to bum bio-diesel. Bio-diesel also has improved lubricity reducing maintenance of injectors and injector pumps. When compared to diesel fuel,bio-diesel may produce the following results (results are based on side by side diesel locomotive engine test): • Reduce NOx by 5 to 14 percent, • Lower particulates up to 65 percent,virtually eliminating black smoke • Improve fuel efficiency by 5 to 13 percent. • The same additive in gasoline can improve fuel efficiency and reduce NOx by proportionate amounts while reducing CO&HC by 60 to 70 percent. Two bio-diesel companies,American Bio-Fuels,LLC and Southern States Power Company, Inc., have expressed an initial interest in forming a partnership with OCSD to produce useful bio-diesel fuel that could be used in OCSD's and other nearby cities' fleet of diesel powered vehicles and stationary equipment OCSD could reap the benefits of improved engine performance,reduced sit emissions,reduced diesel consumption while doing its part in supporting this emerging technology. Bio-diesel is produced predominantly from waste cooking oil. Since FOG collected from grease traps typically has a lower concentration of of,this alterative would be most feasible if waste cooking oil could be collected separately. Currently Darling International has placed containers at a number of restaurants to collect waste cooking oil for their rendering process. The Biodiesel refiner could offer the same service to these businesses or form a partnership with the rendering company to obtain this oil. Such an amingement would be of no economic benefit to the District. It would be more economical for the refiner to pick up waste oil at a central location such as one of the treatment plants,however this would involve another handling step for a liquid waste hauler. American Biodiesel is currently exploring opportunities in Mexico to operate a pilot facility to handle grease trap waste and would like to open discussions with the District to place a pilot facility at the plant site. Pilot testing of this process should confirm feasibility of producing yellow grease from grease trap waste within the next six months. Other technologies sire emerging to concentrate the yellow grease portion of FOG for use as a feed stock for the biodiesel refining process. A byproduct of this process is a dark glycerin that must still be landfilled. No commercial operations using this technology handling grease trap wastes are currently in business on the mainland. Alternative 4—Landfill Disposal Landfill disposal could be done by combining solidified grease with grit and rags removed at the headworks at the County landfill disposal site. This alternative is less desirable than others because BROWN AND C A L D W R L L p\foMa\orM fag\msd in-plant fog imps sradv final trport(rl)4m November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 19 it would be contrary m California's regulations requiring diversion of recyclable wastes from landfills. Disposing of FOG at a landfill would require other recyclable solids to be diverted. Implementation of this option would require the same structures and equipment as Alternative 2. This would require some form of FOG concentrator,such as a gravity settling tank or a DAF. Increased odor emissions would be expected as well as increased traffic. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES In this section each of the alternatives listed above are further evaluated based on the following criteria established at the June 2002 kickoff meeting. A workshop was held in October 2002 with OCSD staff to rate the relative impacts listed below: • Operational impacts—Impact on treatment process unit operation and changes to Standard Operating Procedures • Maintenance task impacts—Impact on type and number of maintenance tasks in the treatment facility • Staffing impacts—Impact on staffing • Traffic impacts—Impact on facility vehicular traffic • Economic Impacts (treatment costs)—Impact on cost for treating FOG including revenue gained or lost by beneficial byproducts of FOG treatment(such as methane gas generation) • Environmental Impacts—Permitting and other impacts on the environment at the plant site and point of discharge in the fort of increased odors,increased oils to the ocean, exhaust emissions from trucks,etc. Alternative IA—Base Case (Status Quo) The impacts of continued operation of the facility as it cumendy exists is provided as a basis for comparison to the other alteratives. Impacts of maintaining the current mode of operation are well known.Weekly sludge line cleaning is done of the primary sludge lines and periodic manual removal of grease balls is done in the aerated grit chambers and bar screen influent channels. Increased FOG quantities will increase the frequency of maintenance already occurring and possibly require additional maintenance attention in the primary scum collection and pumping as well. Alternative IB-D—On-site Treatment Using Anaerobic Digestion As described above,this alternative may be implemented in several different ways: each having its own impacts. Because the current practice of FOG treatment in the anaerobic digesters appears to BROWN AND C A L D W R L L p:V..&\oc fag\o W m-plan,fog fi p ,.w Y-final repon(H).do November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 20 have no adverse process impact it's assumed that any variation of this alternative would have no adverse digestion process impact either. Alternative 2—Oft site Recycling at a Grease Rendering Facility This alternative would require additional equipment that would add complexity to the operation and maintenance of the plant. While removing FOG from the treatment system may have a beneficial impact on treatment process operation and maintenance,added tipping fees and costs due to loss of a valuable product,methane gas,may make this alternative less desirable. Traffic in the plant could be significantly increased. Because there would be no reduction in liquid volume,traffic to and from the site would double. Due to fluctuations in the market there could be significant economic risk associated with this alternative. Alternative 3—Off-site Recycling as a Bio-f iel This alternative could require a process to separate useable yellow grease from the grease trap waste. One of the biodiesel companies has expressed an interest in siting a pilot facility for removing yellow grease at one of the treatment plants. If the BMPs currently being developed encourage separation of waste cooking oil from the rest of the FOG this alternative would be more desirable. Implementation of a pilot study for yellow grease separation and market analysis would require approximately six months to complete. Alternative 4—Off--site Disposal of FOG at a landfill This alternative would require some additional facilities that would increase the complexity of the operation and maintenance of the treatment facility. Combining solidified or concentrated FOG with grit and screenings would add another handling step that would complicate the disposal process and increase the amount of residuals hauled off site. Meeting the"paint filter"test for landfill disposal may also be difficult to accomplish. Table 4 provides a more detailed comparison of impacts of all four alternatives including the four variations of Alternative 1. Comparison of Alternatives Evaluation Criteria Weighting. To better define the relative importance of each criteria,a workshop was held on October 9,2002 with operations,compliance and source control staff(See figure 8 for evaluation matrix). In order of perceived importance by OCSD staff the impact criteria rated as follows from least important to most important: 1. Economic Impact 2. Environmental Impact 3. Staffing Impact BROWN AND CALDWELL p:\toiwa\«sd tog\ocd v.-ptva tog lingo,srvd�-tew apon htl.�r' November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Im act Stud 21 4. Traffic Impact 5. Maintenance task Impact G. Operations/process Impact Equiv A a C D E F Score % ID 3 3 3 2 5 13.0% 2 1 2 21 t6 16.0% 2 t 1 9 24.0% 2 ] 18.0% t 11 29.0% F 10 26.0% In each bon,provide a wore for the pe"Inent criterion when compared directly to the TOTAL 38 100.0% corresponding criterion for that box. 0-Insignificant;1 =Equal Significance;2=Slightly More Important;3-Significantly More Important Criteria Descri tion A Operallonaaprocess Impacts S Maintenance Task Impacts C Staging Impacts D Traffic Impacts E Economic/Life cycle Impacts F Emdronmental Impacts Figure 8. Evaluation Criteria Matrix Non-Monetary Comparison.The alternatives developed for treatment and disposal of FOG were compared based on the impacts to the treatment facility as noted above. The impact criteria factors were rated on a scale of 5 to 1 for each alternative with 5 being the most desirable and 1 being the least desirable. The basis of the rating was degree to which the OCSDtteatment facility would be impacted. Table 3 shows a comparison of alternative factoring in the criteria weighting noted above. BROWN Aaa CALDWELL p:\fandr\nerd fog\.d ie.plmr fog impxr e,W,.(al npon(11).Jac November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 22 Table 3. Evaluation of Alternatives opeuJonal Mainteuaoce sta16e8 Tm85C F.commic Imvtrwmm0l 1m M Ira a 10 am 10 • I Ira act TotalCriOnnwi 6 5 ct 3 act ra 1 1 AI00adac, Raw Mciahattl Raw \V ' hted Rac,lWeiehtcd Raw SVci " Raw we' tad Raw we hted IA B.Caae _ 12 - 10 3 9 3 12 4 4 3 6 53 5 ma IB On-sita ua 4 N 4 x ♦ 13 2 8 4 a 5 10 is 2 digcadnn_ 6fadiaed Laud Read IC O -6w 3 18 3 13 3 9 2 a 3 3 l 8 61 V dig0t o Madirw LpuW accaam, nacianina ID On-ai0 6 39 A 1) i t? 2 t44 5 10 98digeadoDt&.acd adan2 Oaaile J 2J 4 3t 4 13. 1 3 6 68 3 FOGra tct3 Offeite 5 30 a '_5 5 IS 5 10 93 1 t.atTerlt-Di.h.1ff 4 O .i. _ 12 _ 1n 6 1 _ d0 6 diap0d- Ianass Capital Cost Comparison. Estimated capital costs have been prepared for each alternative. Table 6 shows the estimated capital costs for implementing each alternative. Estimated construction cost are considered to be"Order of Magnitude'estimates. The American Association of Cost Engineers defines an Order of Magnitude cost estimate as having an accuracy of within+50%or—300/o: BROWN AND C A L D W B L L p:\fwda\ocad fug\omd in-plant fog impact nudy-final report(d).duc hlovem6er 2002 om.,C.ttq sa.b.ti.n Dubs, ImIN'm FOG Immm Smde M Table 4. CompmimE ofAlmmam Imp.cu Lvebnw Cants tt.11elA Nlerwtirc IN MenMe1C Numurbe0 0,ltt ea Nvmninl Nnwdef Brxu Qm=Mve Cwe^ lletlYlvJ POO nmImrW 11NYIrd POE4vMR. ONb[M Winrbn OOrlw Truenmru RrruNAR ONW L ftw LLflnrl Ias11N OYpY DiPrl^n lT W W PMtlry 4].ernmxlrq..nv tllnr.nunelwrNmmuM (llernmmMmwnnmy. Oprtt mMrewmm�p. (IleugaeC[aadayrne OprnmelmvF(1G rmq Novbap rovwngenlm Qa¢roeurtngrram n uernR rpmn • hgnnmg NP^^Fv{^(IVC • d8^nvBaW P+Pgal AJC • wtltl[nBl[ae Pmem ubinlnkyrin'rcNemg OprrnonelFrpednvg Ct,,ar d...fkn[nnM Oamp iedprrcrgnaar gnnlwv (ab? Abi mnR�a[m4m OPermarelrtw dr[muM I.hvgemagan had.q NewbLMmApwnrvm MrdvetlbPlneTniR lw Ul•ernmalrcwnbr[anrtl rrpmlxno(RL>•'RM OPernmel Rw ePne.m rTr.mr bm.nr br. rmmPae rrT...n e.i6.rilaep�wn • 14tivMIW WvnWse Pm.W tru dn�NmnnW InrtvnJ nY fmmmJveJ lud lmrreoY.n' r Aynimillrxtl6ugiebkN mamrry WAr 4N iod.pmn Mntlxr. ma wbpu Wnnengv • IruWrle nrgmMOAP . Abe gwau rvnwn ptluxtllntl lnvwvJm paamame Lem FpG New[lem[1 Wnxrl le rnr m.mnroral.A R.e e�p¢n b.wm[nrvw • WVNIml lmuemtlam Akaysnnw lnP.wv r fmanMJWgbe4awq • mdnNrANp 6rc hwni &dmea JWp 1n 1—,W 1mv[knmA A•areNrAdp Lm tL,—, • Leiwvd•kttp l^¢e4auq • PWurN JWpline4[rvq NetluMnPmw'~ N1.0 Pmu?'r RodnNpanwr[um pdv-W Pnmmxmr .—Ipmun— Lea¢rd p—?'w— gWuvdpnmrf r[w • In¢.wJ nedxa hams • P_`It. • W^VR • lP-R • pmPR • 1% r prlpN • .turvmnv nlo4ununrA r ..-I m[lavv[N t1t,' • hdmnlrteelravilekanR • WduvtlwlrnLahany • IlnluteJnnlwwaNnR • L.d muLvnraelerdR • Xrav[arw[bad[a[4ani Nrv<y[pmmrn manvin Nrvapvl^Rm lermimanW AibmWaiinermnwvm Ntwrmng rabwmtiuva AltivnxeolmeFvnN • AJJnrvra w.nrvig avlM • ICIO^wi^RaY IJeMq norg mnwJ mb ALurvenneMRae m larMW Rutt�BLrpwu a.aL�y[hvy roluvW MnOk�nrtaeJremnnwatt IdJie ivrtvnimw?vuR pntlb xrtaW wawnuntt Sine aalLRthrg SnenNYiRekrip Serrmafmgehnp neJ<M'Al lnr mtivvv[al unlit JrmvJr.e nm[ovrra((tdmrfr Je ruble rAmyA ile mnyrneJ asi0.ra PnN fer Q4Alelnw ekxn.vY..FttueN M�a pl.un Pl.mm• IMFLeenaW nwvorep y.NorearvM aY Iwwvw mOYAl na(frgiu Innuea QVdlnarmapenve Inn..raON.l nnawgwme Pnv�umimuvwt qnw a.lnw.mww .Y mvammwpmm. as mema?rm.t..rtnn, v M.em T:(fi[Inpnr Inn.wdenm nalfu InrtaJpinpurrrrtare Ircwr P^•• uffia InnI....lYnt Pm[rxrrv(h I—.wplmlRttnvlrvRe Rwbkme mPlnr Inrtr mplmpmvrml& n nw F001nPiA 4eM wwv FOGtX MPiRIidm ww FOG6.rpgbdrrm fuuv. yfm nNenB pm'muahilrwirla a dgene pbf. mAn4nerg amwe. Pavhk eenOnwhrhYp Y4 P[vaslnprn L¢In rtAaNnnnl in . pwknayllyOfapurtL.re Ilvawanuil NpmAu r L[avearuxra Lnpmlvee InnwlnweYpr uvpe dr r IrcrzaeJnmvilP ug Ju paue pmlawav muenxd Iwbl.n®alm Aue Ym�anW nnAae Aemxmanl mnhx rebrelmdx pWni ie WrolrinAve p�mlem mhai aWfrnihxpminrm nerlvefwAnm A.anaw pvAmm� Lr CTwI Mv I I'l pmrJ.4�rcrtae[eLwmrtnr Adarbna rtpMAr Mvkrwtgxiatrvlar IwvstlaPrtwlgmvl fer InrtW apeuvgtul in nnaNgrtrvegenr [mr b—nw 1yyev 1, an.wdenTlmleaW • ffinrn(Wn[ennf IIkw FOOdwkYq updpnmr ev'FCGaryxRaY • aNrmadgvhr r Cmrev.mptl M1fmWer 4uv dd hwlpveM1w reap • Cgitlmu Hrwx'fuli.e NrrvLwvabrpolwnv • .WLimiAnuedgwe r IngvyJtnT tnibtraed • nflwMbebwbvl Cpriltmr brm 4�ber <Tnatvr br rtv6-0un rnh! nargr. Oxi[minLN Ar maLn .ldlnmtl[Imn4 Sad fm r m .t,tk net nb[tmlMuePnr bd 4tlmtlnM4ma[enxe Wmm�enil brprr bere.waragYy In¢nM rmyAvq IvnrtlrmpkB IvrtnNrrrckemrm IvnaW rnukemrrmm from RWxdPM�fw.NOr.CO RtJnw ft.A IrtnrW mekemmum Inrtaedrx[ksmrrm IrcrtaW wkarmrem 4wrnl[.Rvurt 3vJiL ivEB r•nnd+wl hn nAtk ppwetllaYRLtTwi? M1 n44uwrtnrvlM mrw.n hirr W[T�.n bmrW tgmrt rmhnlwingnpv{ wlrlxetlmel Gmmwerp prMtte AnY Rm4R f l k 1 1 BROWN kRp C A L O N 8 LL y 1.�.^Ilyk'.a..pw�xk•^p•^^•F.m nwn elµ. N...rtbv AP3 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 24 Actual project costs from similar wastewater projects,budget prices obtained from vendors,and cost curve data have been used to complete this analysis. A list of general economic and process assumptions for the treatment and disposal options is provided below. These assumptions,which are consistent with the recent advanced digestion study,include: • Electrical and control costs are equal to 12 percent and 20 percent of mechanical and structural modifications respectively. • Capital Cost mark ups: o Modification and coordination with existing facilities 10 percent o Contractor overhead and profit 15 percent o Permits,bonds,and insurance 2.5 percent o Estimator's contingency 40 percent o Sales tax 7.75 percent o Engineering and administrative Costs 30 percent o Markup for piping materials and installation in 15 percent the existing tunnel systems at Plants 1 due to congestion. Table S.Alternative Capital Costs. (Millions) Alternative capital Cost Alternative lA—Base Case StatusQuo) $ 5.7 Alternative IB—Modified FOG receiving Option 1 —tie in FOG line at digesters $ 1.1 Option 2—tie in FOG line at DAF feed $ 0.9 Alternative IC—Modified FOG receiving,thickened sludge blending $ 4.6 Alternative ID—Dedicated digestion (Includes fume digester cost) $ 4.6 (Without future digester cost $ .4 Alternative 2—Off-site treatment at grease rendering facility $ 1.1 Altemadve 3—Off-site rec yclin as bio-fuel $ 0 Alternative 4—Off-site disposal at landfill solid fhb osa $ 3.1 Detailed capital cost estimates for each alternative are included in Appendix A. BROWN A N D C A L D W 0 L L ry\tandn\and fog\asdin-plant fog input nude-anal npm,(rl).doc November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 25 RECOMMENDATIONS The seven alternatives developed for treating or disposing of FOG in the OCSD are: • Alternative 1 —Onsite Digestion o Alternative 1A—Base Case (Status Quo) o Alternative IB—Modified Liquid Receiving o Alternative 1C—Modified Liquid Receiving and Thickening o Alternative 1D—Dedicated Digestion • Alternative 2—Off-site treatment at a FOG rendering facility • Alternative 3—Off-site recycling as bio-fuel • Alternative 4—Off-site disposal at a landfill The alternatives were ranked based on various impacts to the OCSD treatment facility. The ranking results indicate that Alternative 3 ranked the best,followed by Alternatives 1D and B.Although Alternative 3 ranked the highest,the risk associated with Alternative 3 depends heavily on a third party that currently is in the development stages. Brown and Caldwell recommends that Alternate D be implemented until pilot testing and market analysis of Alternative 3 is completed. To verify performance and process design requirements for dedicated digestion,a pilot test using grease trap waste should be petformed. To inject FOG downstream of the digester heat exchanger some minor piping changes would be necessary. Until this work can be completed,the OCSD can continue its current practice of receiving FOG, Alternative 1A. REFERENCES Ahring,Birgittek,Environmental Biotechnology Lecture Notes,Lecture 10,University of California, Los Angeles,Spring 19,98 Brown and Caldwell,FOG BMP Manual for Oregon 2000,Association of Clean Water Agencies, wlrw.orcawa.or+ Brown and Caldwell,Grease Disposal Study for Wastewater Division,Department of Public Works, County of Hawaii,October 1998 Brown and Caldwell,City of Kissimmee—Expansion of South Bermuda WRF 2000— Grease/Pumpout Receiving Station,May 2001 BROWN AND C A L D W B L L p;\fonds\mad fog\o implam fog impact rtudl-( l report(.I).doc November 2002 Orange County Sanitation District In-Plant FOG Impact Study 26 Chapelle,F,Groundwater Microbiology and Geochemistry, 1993 Joyce,Charles,P.E.,Brown and Caldwell,Grease Impact Assessment Rehabilitation Pilot Project County Sanitation District,Sacramento County,California,June 2000 Mehan,B,University Chemistry,3"Ed,Chapter 18, 1975 Metcalf&Eddy,Wastewater Engineering Treamunt/Disposal/Reuse,3' Edition, 1991 OCSD,TPOD Annual report database,July 2000 to June 2001 Souza,Christine,"High energy prices send dairy industry into tailspin",California Farm Bureau Federation Ag Alert,wavwxthf com/agalert/1996-OU/2000/an-1220g.linn,December 20, 2000 Streitwieser,Introduction to Organic Chemistry,Chapters 19,20,28,and 29,2'edition, 1981 Van Opstal,B,M.E.,P.E.,Organic Resource Technologies Inc.,et al,"Use of Fay Oil and Grease Waste as an Agricultural Soil Conditioner",WEF 12*Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings,July 1998 BROWN AND C A L D W B L L pAronda\xW fog\.W m-ph.,fogs putamd.,-final upon(,0.doc November 2002 APPENDIX A Alternative Capital Cost Estimates OCSD Grease imoact stuEv Alternative woiial cost estimates WOIXR u0etl teal -total Aldrrutlee l_Gne1Ne on Gm li elA-BYeC Duo e,,.. Gl%Sa lillaa DIP 5uduG p -6' I amm tBBpO ylp 32W0.000 NN. etl yWmGO!I¢GVM elbYelae f5pp,poa Su0blel f2500.000 MOC. aM natl'vak xim ensGn E25a.eW Ganods W ElaWu $p Mlac f.'mbxlrcMCncb E175.0.tl Sagom wanee M U .aea Pm . e f132. PnmU,mMa u3lruvmm f)3.1n123 Esnnnu'z f11M 000 Sabin 3213.9ee uB naRmienawn 1f11M WM.00Wa fwl ReunEeO tlmab f5.]W Aibmetlw lBalomRe6 _ MA,W- am -Orert. faa 100... Cvuse steam- 2 Ssis.m mom Greau n -300 2 Si5.00D E30= Guae ' too' va�e•GIas INM f f120 E120.000 335a.O00 Mblf aW mEuule xiN W5.000 m El 335.00D ElecNtal 5105A0D N.lac CmF Nh�etls f1N..WD Su0mm W24M CmeecW oMal®E $13.M PmNla,dalpz®IE N}osra 513.T39 Estim4ltYs U2=E $'ealaz S12.M En " mM AEmMdENpI $1&,SSO w $1,EI.D R W.= euMeE EatlmeR mk= a-trm tlmmWFAW. GweRCeFM aftllm- 2 55MM fW.. (Pew -3W z s16IM 53auDD Gm85a mDaFs-6•GmRbaa SaD slw sr2.00D summ SB0 s=200 wD mN�d lever Ccnbdz M Elxakm .5o0 N.lecf:meslu hpvetls U1.140 aem Sm,140 121 calo-aad oa®nre $11. z 14mX4.NMsaltl Nnvm2 $ 13a89.5m EaiMmlYa Seles a E38.M ]i8 mtl Amn'va4aadal 5.7 W z ram fszs.]ee Reuneae M. a3DD.DDD AIYmNrem MOaIfN3s - - _" Gea4e - SmIPI- 2 f3151M sz00 S3D,m. Greaae -300 2 31E.000 OW HeeRtld lank 1 E05p W0 f mn m B Ble M�L d e&g p4 f320.OW 332 m kMeE resa 1500 i2A] IJ Su0bm $1. WD s50.00Dlw= aWcmGvmevml (`g1ry19 E150.OW FJtttrkal Ef50.W0 Mlx Cmtracb mEVMa f105.D00 9MNal EB55.000 CplAadV Ovatl W f353250 Pdmilz.ImaS mb Narare SS2,m $182.W0 ESEnmarS 1Ez.513 aM NEmNIf046 l f] WN E1,5m9B.in139 Raullaetl E.amam E4,5W 000 Arovnetlw ro Datlirnea. oaD Stf .We eazN lemae.5m ' i zaoD szaao A.Ph.ft ae 2'u10 E60 $1101000 6bCi NO, $10,000 8Ntl1[aC .b 140 E16 SY 100 �1b XtlMmelx' 1 31 E00 OOD Si 600,OW MOdft SUMoW 31 . 0 na W VtllreIe MN of E1521B2.21210 UWAN MIBC CgIpBCln NatruN W4.N] EIOmIBI 3B 2.06 PO W, d.n 3382.0E PamtlN tlntlB3M Nvumw 393.867 EBIBnvIOM1 owNn $197.369 Stlev iBB 31B].8m entl MMnl0mllm .9n.006 mM Ev,e]2.126 MM EVEnub f1,B00.508 -M 'DI 91m IMIutlM fwcapft4 bHMmaMkalBa : eetlOnM fu u AXeme6m 3O0.e1DIl3 1. et lafWM :3fi.P .o BOOM MM clank w0niu1 1 u 3600,000 $500000 MM nacmtlhma xlN mtl 550.000 Cannily 30 EIaeMW 30 Mic CaMn3tla Ntlbemv E35.00 SN[YI 6.000 Ccn3ncb wa11e9! $B]. E1< 2E825 PmmBe,beMamM Nmirerte ENmNah $U5.330 e&NB E<5.33 En 8 E In0min mMAtlmmv0vlbn $1]5,500 Tom 1,1�2,2f3 RvuntlM FJBmvm Ef,100,000 AXenutive3O&MM MNu010mv1 vmemoll onl - ' - AMnutlw30RaXetlla lel laM011 $01M tlh 1 33 100 6o.a00 PIM a Wnk c,isti eMmlan ms.FOG tmtmRelor 1 S1AW.W0 s1.000000 cowtluulevAN Moa aM n 3100.000 canuav $lN= Fl Mi. Ea00.00 Cmhertlw Ntltraia 370,WO SubW 3570.00 Onmaa d.n sz35.5Bo EW.I.Boras aM In, s.= EWmelo.'e mrmn rM $B2B.000 SelaB u. $f 1 En ma]wmmlBBabnI U71,= Tom f,ae ROYnaM 6tlmab f3100 O0 T - _ = . '„���' __• _ L - ate- imiW � i- ;49 L- i