Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-12-18 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT December 11, 2002 Phone: n14)962-2411 fes: (7141962U366 NOTICE OF MEETING www.oud.mm .111"0 adder' BOARD OF DIRECTORS PO Bon 8127 Pocmain Valle,C4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92728-8127 et addram 1.8444 EisA,. WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2002 - 7:00 P.M. Runcain Valley.0 92708-7018 Member DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES A0'n`" 10844 Ellis Avenue • Cities Fountain Valley, California 92708 A"a Bra The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Buena Park District will be held at the above location, time and date. cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Gordon Grove Huntington Beech u ne La Habra L.Palms B rd Secrete me IVLos Alamitos Newport Beech Orenge Placentae Bed Ana Seel Beech T"t°"T,a dn p Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings 411e Perk r.roa ones County of Orange FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday,January 8, 2003 at 5:00 p.m. Benlury Districts JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT costa Me.. SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE -Monday,January 13,2003 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD Midway Gry Wooer District. STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday,January 22,2003 at 5:00 p.m. /rain.Rencn SPECIAL BOARD WORKSHOP -Wednesday, February 19, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. To maintam warlbclass leadership in wastewater and water resource management. BOARD MEETING DATES January 22, 2003 February 26, 2003 March 26, 2003 April 23, 2003 May 28, 2003 June 25, 2003 *July 16, 2003 August 27, 2003 September24, 2003 October 22, 2003 *November 19, 2003 *December 17, 2003 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month GAwp.db\admin\BVAgenda\2002 Meeting NoUws\MN12.2.dm ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 12/18/02 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (MURPHY)........................ ALVAREZ...................... ✓ ✓ — (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................�G (vacant) ............................ BANKHEAD.................... � — (MILLER).......................... BRADY .......................... — (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ...................�G ✓ — (CRANDALL).................... COLLINS ......................_G i — (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE.............. — t6(CHRISTY) ....................... vacant........................... �/ ✓ — — (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE.......................G �G — —(DOW).............................. vacant......................... — (WILSON)......................... DUVALL...................... �G ✓ — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. _� ✓ — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN.................. (vacant)............................ JEMPSA...................... (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... �G — (vacant)............................. KROM........................ �/ ✓ — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... � � — (HERNANDEZ)................. MC CRACKEN............... — (FRESCHI) ....................... MC GOWAN ................._,G _A±ff— — (SIMONOFF)................... MOORE........................ �G ✓ — (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............. _,G _L — (KEENAN) ....................... PIERCY........................ — (ADAMS) ......................... RIDGEWAY................... — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... . — (BLAKE)............................ WALKER.......................�L — STAF Anders on AndersonGhirelli F^ Kyle LudwMathews M Mathews I/ Miles Ooten Tomko ✓ Streed OTHERS: Woodruff 1 Nixon � A 12/18/02 G9wp.dtatetlminOS\DIRECTORIDlrectoro Roll Cell.Ooc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: —( �O Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) Y/II IV(J P�(/ 1 r l%— ✓//y y/J HOME ADDRESS: (number street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( ) -7 REPRESENTING: SE1, (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Z ( S{ ' L- AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: Oa 'wCe'V-i L-'-'C7 c w c (number/street) F� V 11 -L (city/zip code) ✓ cG TELEPHONE: 0/ 77} ! l5 REPRESENTING: , '(self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: �J (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( ) REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) lease print :Mby N a7 dtercxs�� Aecmr AIM, YES or&goopi!w iri idvn Ea,�, V' ' H.WP.DTANDMINIBSRMMSISIGN-IN FORM.DOC CHAIR'S REPORT (Report 2 of 3) BOARD MEETING OF DECEMBER 18, 2002 INCLUDED IN YOUR FOLDERS IS AN INVITATION ANNOUNCEMENT FOR THE SECOND ORANGE COUNTY LEADERSHIP SYMPOSIUM TO BE HELD THURSDAY, JANUARY 23 THROUGH SUNDAY, JANUARY 26 AT THE UCLA CONFERENCE CENTER IN LAKE ARROWHEAD. THE FEEDBACK FROM LAST YEAR'S CONFERENCE WAS VERY POSITIVE AND I RECOMMEND THAT YOU ATTEND THIS YEAR IF YOU CAN. I KNOW SOME OF YOU HAVE ALREADY NOTIFIED BLAKE'S SECRETARY, JEAN TAPPAN, OF YOUR INTENTION TO ATTEND. IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY DONE SO AND PLAN TO ATTEND, PLEASE LET HER KNOW, OR FILL OUT THE FORM AND GIVE IT TO BLAKE OR PENNY AND THEY WILL TAKE CARE OF REGISTERING AND MAKING PAYMENT FOR YOU. i U THE ONLY WORKING COMMITTEE THAT WILL BE MEETING IN JANUARY IS THE FAHR COMMITTEE ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 8T". THE STEERING COMMITTEE WILL MEET AS USUAL BEFORE THE JANUARY 22ND BOARD MEETING. BOTH MEETINGS BEGIN AT 5 P.M. I WANT TO NOTIFY THE NEW DIRECTORS AND THE RETURNING DIRECTORS THAT WE HAVE SCHEDULED A SPECIAL INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR DIRECTORS ON THE THIRD WEDNESDAY NIGHT IN FEBRUARY, THE 19T", BEGINNING AT 7 P.M. AND IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE FAHR COMMITTEE MEETING WHICH WILL BEGIN AT 5 P.M. STAFF WILL PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE OPERATION OF OUR FACILITIES, OUR OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM AND OUR CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM. z REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE TO THE BOARD (Report 3 of 3) WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2002 AT 5 P.M. 1 . THE STEERING COMMITTEE APPROVED THE MINUTES OF ITS NOVEMBER 20TH MEETING AND I ASK THE BOARD SECRETARY TO RECEIVE AND FILE THEM. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER AND STAFF PROVIDED I UPDATES ON ACHIEVING 30/30 SECONDARY TREATMENT STANDARDS; BIOSOLIDS AND DISINFECTION. 3. GENERAL COUNSEL PROVIDED AN UPDATE ON SAWPA AND THE SARI LINE RELOCATION PROJECT. A MORE COMPREHENSIVE DISCUSSION WAS HELD IN CLOSED SESSION. GARY STREED REPORTED ON A PROPOSED POLICY TO PROVIDE LOW INTEREST LOANS FOR CONVERTING RESIDENCES FROM SEPTIC TANKS TO SEWERS IN AREAS OTHER THAN UNINCORPORATED ORANGE COUNTY. 3 GREG MATHEWS PRESENTED THE DRAFT OF THE DIRECTORS HANDBOOK AND ASKED FOR INPUT ON THE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS SECTION. THESE WILL BE HANDED OUT TO DIRECTORS IN JANUARY. BOB GHIRELLI REPORTED ON ANTICIPATED OUTREACH EFFORTS IN SACRAMENTO IN 2003, INCLUDING THE USE OF SCOTT BAUGH. THE COMMITTEE DIRECTED STAFF TO N L-- - A"'jg bw 70 ITEMS GOING TO THE FAHR COMMITTEE IN JANUARY WERE REVIEWED. rg� QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ON ITEMS ON TONIGHT'S BOARD MEETING AGENDA WERE ADDRESSED AS NECESSARY. 9• THE COMMITTEE MET IN CLOSED SESSION TO �/ DISCUSS ONE POTENTIAL LITIGATION ITEM INVOLVING OCSD AND SAWPA; AND THE OCSD VERSUS KERN COUNTY LAWSUIT; AND FUTURE COMPENSATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM; AND THE 4 GENERAL MANAGER'S EVALUATION AND COMPENSATION RECOMMENDATION DURING 2002. s H V 51NIrN 4 -� V December 18, 2002 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress Staff developed a plan to have all operational secondary facilities online by January of 2003. Attached you will find data on the progress staff has made and the impact on the final effluent by tuming up the level of treatment. Historical trends for final effluent percent of secondary treatment for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) are shown. In addition, current data for the month's BOD, TSS and disinfection effectiveness is shown on a schematic of the treatment system. The data shows that the increased level of treatment is reducing the final effluent BOD and TSS and that the disinfection system is providing significant and consistent bacterial reduction. On November 22, there was a submarine inspection of the outfall for the just-completed Ocean Outfall Reballast project. As part of the inspection, the submarine reviewed the outfall diffuser for any impact from the addition of disinfection chemicals. The submarine operator, who is very familiar with the ouffall system, reported no changes in biota and sea life have occurred at the ouffall diffuser. Additional information has been provided in the General Manager's Board letter and staff will be posting this and other data on the effectiveness of the level of treatment increases and disinfection on the Web in the month of December. If you have any comments, questions or would like additional data, please call me at 714-593-7020. RJO:pjm G1wpAtabm1810AFINALHL101B0ARD LetleMW-121802 Board Packet Cover LeBerdoc Attachments (2) =0 0 P.0.9oNa127 0 Fw"nvara,,l aZI28412I 0 (714)e62-2411 1l Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels e>m Revision 1214102 Final Effluent Percent Secondary Treatment ]0% Winter 2003 Goal a 64% 65% ............_.....__...... ....._.........._.._............_._.................................ddyi. eu% . ...._ _. Monthly Averapa.............. 56% 5] 6]% 50% e5% 12-Month Running Average Jul Aug Sep Od Nov Dec Jon Feb Mar Apr Mry Jun Jul Aug Sep Ou Nov 2.r 2002 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 'er in Final Effluent plea in Final Effluent 00 00 VemIltLlMlt=We Spill 00 .................... .. .. .................................................. N ................ _......_...................... ............. BO _........................ ....................................................................,.....,. SO . .. . _........ . pp ]1 i0 ToA N ]0 1998 Permit Lima a 60 ppm 6DN ........................................................................................ N..A 50 �......... R....A.....p&.....4.... !.......a.... .. N.....,y.....'i .... N .........................._................. . ............_...__.......... ............__......... ................................... ......... .. .......Oa...N a .......__._. __._... ..._. . .. 00 x .......................Secondary Standard Goal a 30 plan 30 Secondary Standard Goal 30 ppm 10. ............................................................................................................ 1g .........._....__........................................_..... 0 0 Otl Nag Ore Jan Fall Ma AP Mar M All he by na her No W Nov, pee JMI Far My Apr Me] Jun Jul Aug Sep ocl Nov Dec 2006 21102 2001 apt Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Last Fiscal Year 2001-02 Progress to Secondary Standards Ending June 2002 Month: December 2002 1 47% 35% Advanced 'AdvanP ed I Ocean Pipeline Pri Ocean Pipeline 53% Final Effluent: Bacteria Reduction: 99.99% BOD = 72 mg/L Goal: 99.7% Reduction TSS = 51 mg/L Chlorine Level Ocean Discharge to OC D Daily Maximum: 0.35 mg/L Permit Limit: Permit Limit— Daily Maximum 1.45 mg/L BOD = 100 mg/L (Average of Eight Samples) TSS = 60 mg/L Final Effluent Final Effluent Goal: BOD = 58 mg/L BOD = 30 mg/L TSS = 35 mg/L TSS = 30 mg/L Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority COMMISSION FOR THE PROJECT AUTHORITY EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY SAW PA ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT December 12, 2002 GENERAL MANAGER P.JOSEPH GRINDSTAFF Ms. Shirley McCracken Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Re: Approval of Three November 26, 2002 Joint Management Committee Motions including Advance Payment of$210,000 for the CEQA/NEPA Services for SARI Protection/Relocation Dear Ms. McCracken: I am pleased to report the SAWPA Commission at its December 101' meeting ratified and approved the three Joint Management Committee (JMC) motions adopted at its November 26, 2002 meeting. These motions consisted of the following: 1. "MOVED,request that the JMC endorse the least cost responsible Alternative,and request PFRD to prepare to implement the project and send the letter to the Corps of Engineers requesting them to prepare to construct the project with the Corps and PFRD acting as lead agencies for CEQA/NEPA compliance." 2. "MOVED,authorization to immediately initiate the CEQA/NEPA process." 3. "MOVED,request the SAWPA Commission place$210,000 in escrow Gran account agreeable to OCSD to initiate the environmental work." Now that SAWPA has ratified the November 26, 2002 JMC action, we urge your Board to ratify and approve these JMC actions as well. Please advise SAWPA when OCSD has agendized this action for the Steering Committee and Board, so we may present SAWPA's check for$210,000 for the CEQA/NEPA services. These funds are being advanced to OCSD for the CEQA/NEPA consultant's fees in accordance with SAWPA's prior authorization, as SAWPA's good faith commitment to implement the JMC's decisions and adhere to the process and the MOU between our two agencies. We look forward to OCSD's commitment to the process as well. K1projec6LSAR1 p.1.1. elaca below Mdo\OCSD McCracken loner 121202.do 11615 Sterling Avenue,Riverside,CA 925034979 • (909)35"220 Administration FAX(909)785-7076 • Planning FAX(909)352-3422 N Ms.Shirley McCracken, OCSD December 12, 2002 Page 2 We suggest that the CEQA/NEPA services contract be closely coordinated with, or preferably managed directly by PFRD,consistent with the November 26,2002 JMC action. We are pleased that the CEQA/NEPA services are moving forward as they are on the SARI Protection/Relocation project schedule "critical path". Please contact Joe Grindstaff or me if there are any questions. Sincerely, � • U \t S. R. Al Lopez Vice Chairman SAWPA Commission C: OCSD Board SAWPA Commission Blake Anderson Joe Grindstaff K:IV•oleca`SARI FoWe relan below Rado\MD McCmdm Idler 12121r2Aoc C1ltgeNT Business Bank Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Tot N.Haven Avenue 11615 Sterling Avenue,Riverside,CA 92503 Onteno,CA 817U (sog)g861080 31255 (909) 354-4235 90-WN1222 $AWISi DATE AMOUNT December 13, 2002 $210.000.00 Pay the Order DE ®® w// orange ge County Sanitation District PO BOX 8127 Au noel Signalture Fountain Valley, CA 92728-812 Y/ ; 2nd Signature Required tar cl ecke s10,o00 and Aboca` as31255110 1: 16222341491: 243L37L28it* SAWPA Ch.k Numba[ 31255 To: Orange County sama11on Diatdtl 1048 Dale 1W32002 Invoice Number Date GL A unt Numbers Diseibullcn Reference vouUm Anwunl Paid Amount 1212020CSD 1V1V2002 32o-0a208DD-00 Suspense $210,000.00 $210,00000 320-00.1800140 NAP-Construdlon $210,000.00 320-00-20800-00 Suegenea ($210,000.00) 0 TOTAL: M01000.00 ORANGE COUNTY Thursday, Janua 23, 2003 ' Sunday, January 26, 2003 r r UCLA Conference Center in fake Arrowhead r, P MPOSIUM !+n enia in tea�er5kip iYnYnersion experience k ijne,� to �itrti�i� t cAr c't�for Gount�-wire, tea�er5k*T. "fimiape('n the iniadars arraskerl agendas pndh /-( �'Q is tra Lion Jirnrurrl hr the midst aJ'cnnhpeting agendas and f_ `,`,,CS J` rrhntless charge. Naeigatng this rvrrain rrquincc as neute level n(hnneste and thoughtfulness. OCLS pnreides a.cgie f n-tan to cuhieute Information rx amm�ver with peens udtn share rnnunnn caaE•erns.el is o ran oes as eat a think..¢met nnAAerelnp nuccelres as leodrrm." _Chris Lose.('hair. 0(T4 A The invitation to attend this symposium has been ex- tended to the 125 members that make up the follow- �� ^ ing boards and commissions: the Orange County Transportation Authority,the Orange County Fire Au- (111/ I7N�, ✓[/J�` thority,the Orange County Sanitation District,the Or- ange County Transportation Corridor Agencies, the County of Orange,the Orange County Water District. the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commis- sion,and the Orange County Division of the League of a c i 1 i ty California Cities. The deadline torregistration is January 6th.Detailed Nestled among the trees up 5,000 feet in the San Ber- registration information is outlined on the enclosed nardino Forest,the UCLA Conference Center is located registration form,including the answers to frequently on the north shore of Lake Arrowhead.The conference asked questions.Please complete the form and mail it facility is made available to government and non-profit per the instructions provided.The registration fee is organizations at a substantially reduced rate. All $525 per participant,which is fully inclusive of all sym- amenities are included in the registration fee,includ- posium materials,lodging,and meals. ing participation in the symposium,meals,and lodg- ing. Symposium participants will be housed in two bed- "OC'LS renewed nie. room,two bathroom condolets.You'll be given an op- /,onneoted with ntv twines and u sense of purpose. portunity to select your own housemate when complet- I saw haw oil ow,marrlee habits tree ing the registration form.We will do our best to ac- contributing to the pmblenh. I think OCLSgers commodate your requests. it the heart gfwirai keeps us iron crating what wv nGdi desire in Orange Couprn" You can get more information about the UCLA Con- —Susan Ritshchel,President, ference Center,including detailed driving directions, League oiCA Cites--OC Division by visiting the conference center's website at www.uclaconferencecenler.corn. ORANGE Cowan LEANERERIe 3re1PGENM r"I a/o Orange County WFCO 11 12 Civic Center Plua,aoom 235 ( Sent.Ane.CA 92701 I LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART t A PPOFEBEIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: December 17, 2002 RE: SAWPA—SARI Relocation Project Status Report On November 27, 2000, the Joint Management Committee ("JMC")that oversees the SARI Relocation Project (the"Project") met to review the current status of various related Issues. OCSD Is represented on the Committee by Directors McCracken, Anderson and Eckenrode, all of whom were in attendance. The OCSD Directors were prepared to request approval of an agreement, whereby SAWPA would pay, on an interim basis, 500/ of the miscellaneous costs, including OCSD staff time and 50%of the cost for the necessary CEQA/NEPA studies. Additionally, the Directors were prepared to submit motions to obtain approval of payment by SAWPA of consulting engineering costs, OCSD staff time costs, and miscellaneous other charges related to the original studies and design evaluations. As further described below, none of the objectives were obtained other than to have SAWPA share, on an Interim basis of 50/50,for the CEQA/NEPA studies. Prior to researching the agenda item for consideration of OCSD's motions, the SAWPA General Manager made a 25-minute Power Point presentation, combined with prepared remarks. Advance copies of the Power Point slides were definitely provided to the 3 SAWPA Members of the JMC, but not to the OCSD representatives. We believe the prepared remarks were also provided to the SAWPA Directors (neither I nor Blake actually saw them reading along with Joe Grindstaff, but we did observe 2 senior SAWPA staff members doing so). Halfway through the presentation, on demand of our Directors, the Power Point slides were provided, but the remarks were not. Joe Grindstaff denied that anything existed other than his notes. The next day we received the 8 pages of the printed remarks, which included specific language for 3 motions to be made by the SAWPA Directors (e.g. "I move the Joint Management Committee..."),thus impliedly establishing that the SAWPA Directors had them. The presentation Itself was full of erroneous facts and misrepresentations, proof of which is being provided to you today under separate cover by OCSD's Engineering and Finance Departments. At the end of the presentation, the JMC approved of the creation of an Ad Hoc Subcommittee of 2 Directors and the Chief Financial Officers of both agencies to meet for purposes of reviewing and approving the expenses incurred by OCSD over the past 2-1/2 years. That meeting is to be held on December 17, 2002, and will be attended by Directors Ferryman and McCracken. ]BUSOOSOlLOOSI t December 17, 2002 Page 2 I am forwarding some materials from the November 27, 2002 JMC Meeting for your review. Your staff and this office have prepared the following summary of alternative courses of action by OCSD in the immediate future. Alternative No. 1 • OCSD turns over responsibility for the ReplacemenVProtection Project to County of Orange PFRD; • PFRD will pay, or cause to be paid (in conjunction with U.S. Corps of Engineers), 100% of the cost; • PFRD Project will protect the Line—not relocate it; • OCSD will not be required to construct new sewers to serve Yorba Linda; • OCSD will maintain ownership of the entire existing SARI; • SAW PA will maintain its ownership of capacity In the SARI; • SAW PA will pay all of the $3.0 million outstanding past due amounts within 30 days of PFRD accepting responsibility for the Project. Pros • Safety of the Line assured; • OCSD gets full reimbursement for past-due amounts; • Virtually no cost to OCSD. Cons • It will take longer to complete the Project; • PFRD may not have the necessary funds. Alternative No. 2 Same as Alternative No. 1 except: • PFRD will pay less than the 100%of the total cost; • Shortfall in project costs to be shared between SAW PA and OCSD on a 76/24% ratio per 1972 Agreement. Pros • Same as Alternative No. 1, except cost. osvaooan\L c l P December 17, 2002 Page 3 Cons • OCSD will bear some cost of the Grade Stabilization — Protection Project. Alternative No. 3 • OCSD turns over responsibility for the Replacement/Protection Project to PFRD; • OCSD conveys ownership of a portion of the SARI (from Prado Dam to the vicinity of SAVI Ranch) to SAW PA; • PFRD and SAW PA negotiate payment for the costs of the Protection Project; • SAW PA pays OCSD the full cost of building trunk sewers to serve Yorba Linda and connection to the SARI at a point in the OCSD-owned line; • OCSD builds the Yorba Linda trunk lines; • SAW PA pays OCSD the full$3.0 million past-due amounts. Pros • Virtually no cost to OCSD; • OCSD gets reimbursement payment for the$3.0 million; • OCSD relieved of responsibility/liability for the Upper Reaches of SARI. Cons • Project will take longer to complete. Alternative No.4 • Relocation/Protection Project is NOT turned over to PFRD; • OCSD selects the lowest cost reasonable Alternative Project; • OCSD and SAW PA agree to cost-sharing allocation for the Project; • OCSD retains full ownership of SARI; • SAW PA pays the full $3.0 million past-due amount. Pros • Project moves ahead faster; • Project will cost less than previously selected Alternative D; • SAW PA pays the$3.0 million past-due amount. �QaDoan\Lmal December 17, 2002 Page 4 Cons • Higher cost to OCSD than other Alternatives (except Alternative D); • Requires successful negotiation of new cost allocation formula with SAWPA; or failing that, a likely fight with SAWPA over OCSD enforcing the 1972 Agreement formula of 76/24%. Alternative No. 5 • OCSD conveys ownership of the SARI from Prado Dam to SAVI Ranch to SAWPA; • SAWPA assumes full responsibility for Relocation/Protection of the conveyed Line; • SAWPA pays OCSD for the cost of constructing Yorba Linda trunk sewers; • SAWPA pays OCSD the$3.0 million past-due amount. Pros • OCSD is relieved of responsibility/liability for the Upper Reaches of the SARI; • OCSD avoids all costs of Protection/Relocation of the Line. Cons • None. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Sireed Mr. D.A. Ludwin ]s\taown\Lmal December 18, 2002 MEMORANDUM TO: Steering Committee Members FROM: David Ludwin Director of Engineering SUBJECT: SARI Line Relocation Aker the meeting Monday with SAW PA and PFRD, I believe SAW PA, OCSD and PFRD have a common understanding and agreement that the project will move forward with the Corps of Engineers and PFRD taking the lead on funding, design and construction, after the alternatives analysis is completed in February. The issue of how the CEQA work will be accomplished has yet to be determined. The Corps may take the lead on the CEQA/NEPA work. They will be reviewing the scope of work that is currently in our consultant's PSA to see if it needs modification. Through January we will be having discussions with PFRD and Corps regarding the results of the alternatives analysis and to decide on how the environmental work will be carried out. We collectively agreed to not start the CEQA/NEPA work until we get a read from the Corps on the scope. We hope to have a consensus point of view on both the project and environmental documentation when we bring the results of the alternatives analysis to the JMC In February. We also agreed to continue the public outreach efforts that are underway until a resolution on the direction of the project is decided in February. At that time we will decide what efforts need to continue and by whom they would be carried out. Tuesdays meeting with SAWPA staff and Commission members was somewhat productive, in that we decided on how to deal with the unpaid portions of the Invoices, including staff time, that were prepared for work done under the current MOU and the work done on the emergency repairs last fall. We will bring a budget and a more detailed explanation for the expenditures for JMC consideration in February. We are hopeful that the unpaid balances will then be approved by JMC and subsequently paid by SAW PA. However, we were not able to make any progress on the outstanding invoices associated with the previous engineering and environmental work associated with Alternative D. I believe we still have a fundamentally different perspective on the responsibility of SAW PA for payment of the work associated with the development of Alternative D. This will take much more effort and expenditure on OCSD's part in order to resolve this issue to our satisfaction,and I am not at all optimistic that we will ultimately be paid. OCSD Summary of SARI Realignment Invoices to SAWPA Status as of 12/16/02 Original Adjusted Amount Invoice Invoice Invoice Paid Unpaid Number Data Amount by SAWPA Amount Invoice Description 22404125039 1OP2312000 $ 121,687.11 $ - $ 121.687.11 2-41: 111/00.6/30100 23272/698 7/2/2001 98,368.79 98,368.79 2-41: 7/1/00-9/30/00 23273/699 7Y2/P001 721,967.99 - 721,967.99 2-41: 10/1/00. 12/31400 23274/700 7=001 91,183.86 - 91,183.88 2-41: 1/1/01 -3131/01 23529/701 10/1/2001 1,304,409.75 - 1,304,409.75 241: W1/01 -6I30F01 23982/702 11/14/2001 133,725.65 - 133,725.65 241: 7/1/01 -9/30/01 24442/694 2/5/2002 259,197.73 239,058.59 20,141.14 2-41-2: 10/1/01 -12/31/01 24443/695 2/5/2002 155.971.68 10.038.31 145.933.37 241: 10/1/01 - 12/31/01 24784/693 4/24/2002 5.937.02 2,894.06 3,042.96 241.2: 1/1/02-3/31/02 24785/24944 4/24/2002 144,808.39 75.703.51 69,104.88 2-41: 1/1/02-3/31/02 24945 6/14/2002 42,673.96 35,450.80 7,223.16 241.2: 7/1/01 -9/30/01 24946 W14/2002 30,736.98 30,736.98 - 2-41-2: Jamison Retention 25041 W9/2002 177,712.72 95,261.73 82,450.99 2.41: 4/1/02-6/ OW 25760(NOTE 1) 11/20/2002 36,985.02 9.985.63 26,999.39 241: 7/1/02.9/30/02 $3,325,366.65 $499,127.61 $2,826,239.04 NOTE 1: Per letter dated 12/12/02 from SAWPA, they will wire $9,985.63 on 12116/02; payment is still pending as of 12/16/02 at 11:30 am. OCSD Invoice No.22404 To SAW PA cw.n P.4otl 1n/WmW3Gro9 Date of TWllnmlw SAWPA'eIS514M Wlletl2�unl Ampw1 alares O sm Was P.brmmtl br OubmM AmountOC30Sb83el6tlea 1W23R000 E 34887.3E 48% 9.W $ 16,]0].W R9New6 wmm6Mon EIR,pmparatl 8y'.tlwweepontlewa moN,worOiwtlwB nmMsidSl1g232W0 $ 49160.2E 46% D.8] S 23SW.8] DWrlbeC br 84111wIWllq pang119aM BCCOWItlryOCSOCOMreol9m8la$or 10232W0 S 1214M 46% 0.80 S 1,3W.W cIalhatEIRawmellMaoamtl ISHOO S 2142E 46% .63 S 102.83 P dwoPWICmr NOwwoMewpmeelbmmlW 411820W S 18.W 4M1.W E 121.44 lido nlan l lManygN.EIR In n Lw wager oce me 2/ITnWO S .115 40% 9.W E 9.W Coplas lanwplea araltlalIplass bn LUYw Aeaw,ElRCawulfaMOCa Re Wig= S 223.w 48% .46 S 1WA6 Coplea q ORmwSNarvmplawOCe Ra M1UM $ 3 S.w 46% 9.w E 1,619.w C.leaq ElR reOOO OCe Ra 6nG000 a 2].61 4654192] s 13.W Me e w SmmWO $ 6w.w 46% M26 S 266.26 M rw I. Me Re Nw 83GOW E M." 46% 2.SB $ 142.w EIR wples OCS M W Nw 6/t30000 E 1 OnA4 46% 14.8E SOMI S 614.8E ElRwpl. OCS A.IsaIiWides 11WOO)l S 34736 46% S 10.73 sO.W q.IN." Caq$Nmp llml OCS Re w4 film 6n0W $ 6nmI $ 32213 $0.0 S 322.73 EIRampl. Me RegspivIphim 9I21l20W $ 2w.69 1 48% $ 103.30 $0.1:0 $ 1W.W EIR wplas Nw fi Me Re ,m $ 131.0E 1 46% $ W.W £O.W S 62.w EIR wplas Gb.LMba6Mwp. II W1988 $ e]w.W 46% $ 326i.B0 SOW S 320i.W Fbl6 wo44 mbwktlll Nob9lwl m P.HepM,arN 9MPNw rawtl Waotlmn,9 melln E Sm's W62Wo $ lM.w 46% $ 4M.82 $u.W $ 451.8E Rwiew tlael9nbulll pm�ega,wMmme,artl memo. Alwrwlewetl SAWPA nmM mpamlMoR WootlMl,fi mgln B Sme6 IVWVi $ 4s64.70 40% 21B1.W O.W S 3191.W R6wamb law m41 1W2 IwmeM*M SAWPq Cmlatl mamw mpaml SAW PAY.sly,reNewtlmflflMlryeq ElR@IB.mlawmwlulbnga6optla0Mblwllw D.aW r.lewq mgeM MMlrgs Holm.S Nalwr I.. 1n- $ Is,&e.w 48% $ BA63.n sO.W S 9 3.T] Damn.CmmuBama-lab l.Il ,subautlape tlllllln9,MSNSF RNIw,Co.Ila8ma0 m ism ,pr msmis MaWMWangda6.goN repml Holm.S Nn.r M. 2 000 $ 1 M43 46% $ 1w.26 SO.W S 1w.26 H lirsda amrO W12090 $ 11463.84 0% S 8 W.64 0.W 8 W.84 Holnms E Namr lnp. 4 OW $ ]680.13 48% $ 3,690.]S SO.W S 3,BW.'/8 Ngmw 6 Namr 0m 8220W $ 7613.81 46% $ 3864.W O.W $ 9864.53 K.S.DUMar 6Aww. 1W1/1998 $ 13,760.00 46% S 6 .W SO.W S 80W.W EIWEI K.S.DU SMaw 1ninW3 E 6]W.W M% S 42W.W SO.W S 42W.W EIRIEIS K.S.DuM rBMew 2/ m- S 28 b.W 48% S 126W.W $5W $ 126WW ENWIS K.S.Dulmar S Mew mam S 28.WO.W 40% S 13 .W EO.W S 13920.W ENWIS K.S.Dunbar S Maw 61w4000 $ BOOO.W 48% S 4 .W SO.W $ 4,3W.W ENWIS K.S.DmOer S Mew I'm S ] .W 40% S 340.W ON 3,4W.W 81I 1S C.R.N P.E. 3n1/20OO $ BNI.W 48% S 451.20 $0.00 $ 46120 Aealemnw.m EIR ant GeofwOln.atl0a0ow G.A.N P.E. Sn1n000 S 2000.W 48% S t ..W $0.W $ 1 46.W Melelenca mm ElR elN Conalmclbn SabMullry C.R.N P.E. BnD2OW $ 2XO.W 4" $ 1,128.W $D.W S 1,128.W A.ieWm mm EIR,Pamtitlllp.entl Combuglw3Gmtllnle qal $ 263614.81 S 121,687.11 O.W $121.07.11 OCSD Invoice No. 23272 To SAWPA Covering Period 7/1100 to 9130/00 Date of Total Invoice SAWPA's Amount Billed Amount Paid Amount Consultant/Vendor Invoices Invoice Amount Cost Share To SAWPA by SAWPA Outstandina Work Performed for Outstandi AmoUnf====j OCSD Staff Salaries 7/212MI $ 29024.71 76% $ 22058.78 $ $ 22068.78 OCSD Staff Overhead 7/2/2001 $ 40 690.86 76% $ 30,925.06 $ $ 30 926.06 OCSD Contract Staff Labor 7/2/2001 $ 27330.83 76% $ 20771.43 $ $ 20771.43 Jays Catering 7/18/2000 $ 140.31 76% $ 106.64 $ $ 108.84 Lunch for 10 people Orange Courier 7115✓2000 $ 75.00 76% $ 57.00 $ $ 57.00 Important package delivery to Eldon Horst MotoPhoto 9/6=0 $ 10.72 76% $ 8.15 $ $ 8.16 Map Copies 9/8/2000 $ 22.69 76% $ 17.24 $ $ 17.24 Copies of maps of SARI area for sewer purposes County of Orange 9/5/2000 $ 850.00 76% $ 646.00 $ $ 646.00 Fees paid to PFRD for EIR/EIS Notice of Determination. FedEx 9/8/2000 $ 19.66 76% $ 14.94 $ $ 14.94 Package to Boyle Engineering for FedEx 9/11/2000 $ 16.96 76% $ 12.89 $ $ 12.89 Package to US Corps of Engineers for K.S.Dunbar B Assoc. 9/112000 $ 4500.00 76% $ 3420.00 S S 3420.00 EIR/EIS K.S.Dunbar B Assoc. 7/1/2000 $ 11525.00 76% $ 8759.00 $ $ 8769.00 EtR/EIS C.R.Nelson P.E. 7/28=00 $ 3,800.00 76% $ 2,888.00 $ S 2 88&00 Assistance with EIR process and Construction Schedule C.R.Nelson P.E. 8/31/2000 $ 4,100.00 76% $ 3116.00 $ $ 3,116.00 Assistance with SARI Line Design Team with Permitting ProceEPSAEE Woodruff, redlin&Smart 7131/2000 $ 2,676.25 78% $ 203395 $ $ 2 033.95 Research and gave guidance on EIR,Fish and Game,into CE Woodruff, radiin&Smart 8/31/2000 43.60 76% $ 33.06 $ $ 33.06 Answer legal Issue with direct costs/subcontrectors regarding the APWA 7/17/2000 $ 55.00 76% $ 41.80 $ $ 41.80 Fee for presentation for USACE Wetlands Permits The Register 7/31/2000 $ 1 656.98 76% $ 1.259.30 S $ 1259.30 OCB Reprographics 7/28/2000 $ 281.39 76% $ 213.86 $ $ 213.86 OCB Reprographics 7/211=1 $ 87.91 76A $ 66.81 $ $ 66.81 OCB Reprographics 7/17)20001 $ 16.36 76% $ 12.43 $ $ 12.43 OCB Reprographics 7/WGOOI $ 161.63 76% $ 122.84 $ $ 122.84 OCB Reprographics 7/26/2000 $ 314.06 76% $ 238.69 $ $ 238.69 OCB Reprographics 8/30120001 $ 117.51 76% $ 89.31 $ $ 89.31 OCB Reprographics 8/29/2000 $ 713.45 76% $ 542.22 $ $ 642.22 OCB Reprographics 8/14/2000 $ 68.17 76% $ 51.81 $ $ 61.81 OCB Reprographics 9/5/2000 $ 434.91 76% $ 330.53 $ $ 330.53 OCB Reprographics 8/31/2000 $ 27.69 76% $ 21.04 $ $ 21.04 CCB Reprographics 8/31/2000 $ 616.66 78% $ 392.58 $ $ 392.58 OCB Reprographics e/e/2000 $ 27.08 76% $ 20.58 1 $ $ 20.58 OCB Reprographics 877/2000 $ 111.79 1 76%1 S 84.98 1 $ $ 84.96 Materials from inventory: Film $ 15.65 76% S 11.89 is $ 11.89 oral $129.432.62 $ 98 368.79 $ $ 98 368.79 OCSD Invoice No.23273 To SAW PA Cb ftc POW lwm W12fl.1Np IKS hanVVendorlmmkes DSNd TO Wl ln% $ mount Bead AmountPaM Amount Imoke Amount To SAWPA b SAWPA Ou MnEln WO PeMrmadwrOubbndkpAmount $UdSala s 722w1 S W.571.85S 25414.61 $ S 25,514.61 Sb6Oveftad 722w1 S 49WIU $ 30 88.52 $ $ 37286.62 CwbadSWLabor 7AYM(n 47,1T26S 35R54.M $ $ 35.854.n O ' a SN329W S 9.wS S." $ S Food 12I1820W $ W.12S eeA9 S $ WAS LuwhlmwNbehww 1211SW0walWamroue 112a2000 $ 10w.W $ 780.W S S 7W.W Fen Gam"Onal Wamr Ouaely Conlyd BOW. nbm BAswo. 1M2om $ SSW.wS 4,1WA0 S $ 4180ADmbmeAswo. 11112w0 $ S.w9.W $ 3AOOA0 S 5 38m.w Pw.e WEUVEIS. nbar 6 Mow, IM20W E 2 W.W $ 19w.w E $ twom Prepay MEI16EIS. K.S.Du rEA 122wl $ 12W.WS 9W.W $ $ 9W.w Prapera dEIMB. C.R.NoWn P.E. 91802000E 2 W $ 19W.80 $ S 1,9W.W 401 ant 494 POW C.R.NoWn,P.E. 109120W $ 1A90.W 1 6 M.W S S 7w.w RavbPlaOaMedmee paMapd W. A.NBMn,P.E. 12R02w0 $ 9140.W 76% $ 2 AO S $ 2,386.40 COMbweOaeabbnwwMPSn 9D 8 G.R.Nabtln P.E. I1(.N1090 E 20O.W M% $ 1558.w S S 1 .W COM6WB0a9618Mme OermNVPMwea Srown$Catlwe9 tORW2000 5156.9W.73 76% SII924455 $ $119244.0 PDA-mobs Wa ,ueby reward,hyd..A .eApmnent beuae,sm.,wrm$AM.and debMp. erormacakwaA 122MOW $164149.81 M% $124.M3.M $ S134.763.7D PDR-ulEyl96aarth,M1ydreuAw,aBpnm.M bwaa..rvW,Dubuc.bead,wnabudbn eetlmeb,I.M19.and mdaM9. Bmw98C918vreu 11MOW S 123.181.64 76% $ 93618.05 $ $ SS618.WHM-pwbd.Mvestlpe6m,DiPeune aupn.,wndr.ed UM-Pmum.MWoM,maps. Boyb-P0m5Wg.CEDA,EIR,bal B,.6CaM 12AWOW $140533.19 MIS $1WAM22 SlW,9W.22 POR-uNByrexe¢R hydreulke a[9nmant bawd.sul ..DWkmvse .wnmW n aeBmab,peml9Mp,ar mwM9. 0.&cab n 12/152W0 $WG .W 76% $1w2 u $ S1w389.M HSA-peebd.hlvesfpatlen,DPe0ne a0pn.,mndr.ed 18M-Pmum.dlbrewM,mew. eoyb-PemMnB.CEQ&OR.b .. Obnn Lukoe$Assm. wimmS Sw.83 M% E 39735S $ 397.W Rwba bk hnW mpon. e Pmbukwb 132 $ 7W.W M% S 570W S $ 5M.w CCTV1126'd42'seaer. e Pmbssknab 11wom S SWIM M% S 6 w $ $ 684.W CCTVWlOd42'eewm. P�w.Pmbsskwb 1111302000E V&W M% $ Sim $ $ 513.W CCTV97ed42'ea L Pm1pspmbeskwb Ilmom $ 975.W 76% S 741.w $ $ 741A0 CCN 1M6'd51'eewer. Pr Pmbssknab Im Som.$ 676.W M%V$ 2W.W .W $ $ 513.W CCTV2591'd61'se n Pro Pmbwknab "Alma 9 $ wl.84 78% W $ $ 7MM CM IMS'damwr. Pm R W.Wab 12 mma $ 841.11 M% $ $ SM25 CCTV 1219'd W'xwm. P Pm1908bwk 1'L132pJ9 E 6WA0 M% .9e $ E 450M CCTV8Wd44'aeu!!. P ePmbwknab IIAM 0 S BW.W 76% W S $ 4WA0 CCTV716'd.l Tomau$Cdbn 11=2000 E 4 .w M% .w S S 3W.w Ellwunrepoftg MB Wns WWdmff,Sp. An$Sn 10912W0 S 101.10 M% .84 S $ 76.94 Q.w w preyuaBlw6on baue we wm,NM.bd vl o mX,Spma &Smarr JWM $ 26.10 M% .84 S S 19A4 Revbmemau RE mdknta wrvWWDLN Wn. Woodruff.SDmdunB Sn 11202W0 $ 474.W 75% .24 $ $ M024 Hevbxed PSA Nnn Hohma 6 Na rend SAWPA wreemenb vAN desyn en9hweM9. The Re Mar 9I302W0 $ 1 6.W 78% .M $ S W8.76 Ad for POW IpNIIDBCa Than Mer 112020W E .W 76% .W S S 152. CrMa-9wde'D OCe ka mmom $ W7.W 78X .W S S 299,55 Me w 9272W0 S 126.12 M% .W $ s IM69 Me ka 9282000 E 94.65 M% $ 71.W S S 71.85 Me Ra ke 91E2000 $ 352.67 76% S 268.W $ S bAW MR w 11I1200 S 27.31 76% $ 20.M E $ M76 Me ka 112120W $ 163.23 78% $ IW25 S S 139.25 Me hW 112W20w S 6.07 M% S 4.61 $ 8 461 OCBRe hka 11M&OW S 60.63 76N. $ 46.w S E 46.W IC[Owl $949.957SS $721,967.99 $ $Ml W7.99 OCSD Invoice No. 23274 To SAWPA Coverino Period 1/1M1 to=1101 Date of Total Invoice SAW PXs Amount Billed Amount Paid Amount Consultant/Vendor Invokes Invoice Amount Cost Share To SAWPA by,SAWPA Outstanding Work Performed fa Outstanding Amount OCSD Staff Salaries 7/2/2001 It 32208.83 76% $ 24478.71 $ $ 24.478.71 OCSD Staff Overhead 7/2/2001 $ 45288.89 76% $ 34419.56 $ $ 34.419.56 OCSD Contract Staff Labor 7/2/2001 $ 25 956.84 76% $ 19 727.20 $ $ 19 727.20 FedEx W3012001 $ 22.46 76% $ 17.07 It $ 17.07 Ovemighteof package to Eldon Horst and City of Yorba Unda Videotapes 1/10/2001 $ 17.25 76% $ 13.11 $ $ 13.11 Purchased blank VHS tapes to copy video Labels 2/21/2001 $ 21.49 76% $ 16.33 $ $ 16.33 MeetingFood ar5/2001 $ 100.00 76% $ 76.00 $ $ 76.00 Lunch for Value Englneering Study meeting on SI M1 MeetingFood ar'7/2001 $ 115.00 MIS 87.40 $ $ 87.40 Lunch for Value Engineering Study meeting on 3/7/01 Meetin Food 3/6/2001 S 64.50 76% $ 49.02 It $ 49.02 Lunch for Value Engineering Study meeting on 3/6/01 C.R.Nelson,P.E. 1/31/2001 $ 2400.00 76% $ 1,824.00 $ $ 1,824.00 Assistance With Permitting process C.R.Nelson P.E. PJ2812001 $ 2,330.131) 76% $ 1,770.80 $ $ 1 770.80 Worked With OC/PFRD and USACE in search of funding C.R.Nelson P.E. 028/2001 1 $ 950.00 76% It 722.00 $ $ 722.00 Assistance With Permitting process Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart ######## $ 285.60 76% $ 217.06 $ $ 217.06 Review AR,englneedng proposal,and agreements with SAWPA Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 1/31/2001 $ 3425,40 76% $ 2603.30 $ - $ 2 603.30 SARI Une issues,prepared opinion letter,went overeminent domaln proceedings,and CEOA compliance Issues Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 2/28/2001 S 2172.30 76% $ 1.650.95 $ $ 1,650.95 Eminent domain proceedings,and NEPA requirements OCB Reprographics 2/14/2001 $ 55.69 76% $ 42.32 $ $ 42.32 008 Reprographics 2/20Y2001 $ 61.87 76% $ 47.02 $ $ 47.02 OCB Reprographics 3/6I2001 29.06 76% 5 22.09 $ $ 22.09 OCB Reprographics 2/23/2001 $ 583.OB 78% $ 443.14 $ $ 443.14 CA Dept.of Fish&Game 2/28/2001 $ 1,390.50 76% $ 1 056.78 $ $ 1,056.78 Fee for 1601 streambed alteration agreement Southern Cal. Edison 1/31/2001 $ 2,500.001 76% $ 1,900.00 $ $ 1,900.00 Plan check fee deposit Total $119,978.76 $ 91,183.86 $ $ 91183.86 OOSD Invoice No.23529 To SAWPA C.I.ftp��mi worm Dale of Tolal Imole SAWPA. Amount oiled Amount Paid A Urvt ConwlWnVvendorlmoM.es Imake Amount Cost Shero TO SAWPA ovSAWPA Caddwanci Want Pedammd for oastendin Amount OCSD Staff Salaries lw/wOt S 32f49.92 ]e% E 24535.94 $ E N.M." OCSD Staff(Nmheed 1d1/20U1 S 47071.16 JCA 1 96,M.W S S 95n4.07 OCSC CanIreG Stall Labor tdtnwl f $9,014.91 78% i 44860.08 S S NBw.BB Padtlw Fee AGE m-USeetl 52 001 f 11" 76% S 10.03 S S 10.09 Parldn twoW animating in LA Materiels-Saf vests E 99.w T516 $ ]6.]0 E S ]5.]0 N Brown E Caw4all 2001 S 163962.24 ]8% S 138611.30 E E 1W 11.30 PM raaeUngs.WIIy rasaamh,hydra nt ulim,alignan let ailaaWn survey,iatfdr aG.,andgmdllln9 Brown&Celdwall W31m01 $ 19163.57 78% S 10W4.91 $ f 10W4.31 Aerial mapping ant pMbOammetry.UPS wugmem. Brown&Caldwell 223/2001 $ la .BB 76% if 1257W.47 E 125]2].47 PDR meet6gs,Wl%ymwamh,rwbring prelim,owGr.esL,errd pmrimw Brown E Caldwell 21W120p1 E 102]89.]I ]e% S 701MI.20 E E M120.20 H&A-Gedech Invpfigation,wnstr.Dam&wGeSARI abantlanmant. NCG-corsair.Dakbase,planning pfdS,outraati Brown&Caldwell 3WW01 9 W6196.]a 78%V29W.51 09.55 9 E 156909.55 PDR rwetirgs,utility resaaron,pmlk ou.,ralomllan and wnalr.Dote,r anna0 ,ROW,ws1 eel. Brown&Caldwell 3/Jdw01 60.399.30 78% M.4] E S 45 9W.4] AM:Aeral Mapan,and PYgto9remrtGby,NCO:getup wmmaniy mwtlnp at Bryant Rentl KOA Traffic Oealgn&Study Brown S Cantwell 6r11/d1U1 $ 2]1104.20 ]6% $ 19.19 E $ 2W.319.19 PFR rnaetlnp,Witty rasaaNl,pemtlNrp,rslorau.maetlnfjs.ROW sonn.,ali9nmpt E,wet eGLnate,Mk analysis,ant Qw dMM Brown 8 Caldwell 6/3QR001 $ 4W,1]2.94 ]fi% $ E 354,281.43 HSA Gwtwh and pemnHing:.:Aadal mapping.ph a,aintanta,,&,A.: PDR,HECOHEC6 mvlewq ant ewNmdiw dwa;NCO:Parka d.PR and dran latter 91.43 easement owners;Overland:BNBF RR;Kok TnfIIG Units:Bike lane lentlspw;REC:Boulder,sunnayng Brown&Celdxall StmC ()l E 20]64S] ]6% 3.4T E $ 15M.47 Admin,wat estimation,risk awlyels SOW &own&Caldwell a29/20D1 $ ]]94.16 76% ne E E 5 8]].98 UTA:Aerial Mapping and Pholdgra ,NCO:Cmnmumy relations,stmlegy/plan,and a faff msnagammd OveMnd:ROW plmWndwmd;REC:BotmOary wrvey ParaomE load N18/2w1 S 36924.35 IDS02.51 i E 29582.51 Value Engineemq Study PagawE Intl fiWm01 5.174.0 ]6% 32211 S S 9932.95 Value Engineering Study KP.Urdstrom W2W1 S 2536.6] ]6% 92].8] E S 192].B] Fleld/Site vNlt KS.Wntas,&Asses. VIMfl S 4440.50 T6% 74.70 E S 3,314.]8 EIR/ElS proess O.T.Boulele 4/W2001 S 2ifaw M ].W S S 1.537.513 Reviewed dada slablll...and aedirwnt nuatif od eludbs C.T.Bathels 3292001 E 1950.W ]6Y. 9 1482.00 S S 1,4 gff Reseemhed and prowred scour anelyals presentation C.T.Belhala 32BMWI S 9]5.01, 76% 5 741.00 S S 741.w Revised amour awlysls prewnlallw and praardad to Gakanol0ere C.R.Nelson,P.E. 3/31Fw0l S 11820.00 76% E 13B9.0 E S loan ASalslanp wah pmWtin,process C.R.Nelson.RE 4/9 l S 3800.W 78% S 273B.W E S 2736.0) Asslstenu wan prmMing prowm C.R.Nelaw P.E. 5/312001 $ 45W.W 79% $ 9<20.W E $ 3,420.W AsslGenre with prmiltiM p ss C.R.Nelson,P.E. 6MW01 f 3AW.W )B)'s $ 2,6B4.W i E 2504.W Nelelsnw Win wnniNng pmwm WoodMl.swadun&Satan 3131=01 S 2,393,40 76% S 1818.90 E S 1818.99 Reviewed memo regarding Yorba Undo lsafas.annals,from Yoft LIMa,aM lraWa of awnmaNp WoodmH,Spraden S Small 4/w2001 E saw 18% E BW.29 E S 6w.29 RWiawedaltemaMasin EIR WoodMf,Spradlln&Sand 54120o1 E 34.80 ]8% E 2345 E S M45 Jobe)-2&1 CA Dept.oI Ran&Game 4/26/2001 E Ty275 76% E 6W.29 E $ Won lWl applkstian Iws "OCB 4/2Y2001 E t 00Gw ]a9f. E 781 $ $ ]W.W Section 404 pemtlt appllcation lees Paufic Bell 7/I6/20011 E 251.80 76% E 191.37 E Is 191.W Cordererxa ull on w&]346]01 OCB ReprnWhim 9/1SIPU01 S 2,1W.97 1 i 1 .26 E S 1,Sam SARI EIR OCB R Hp dtvmol E ]6.62 M% E 6y.46 E S 5].40 OCB Re t m hip 9/2'y/2001 E S308 M% E 40.33 E S 40.39 GCB Re r m him W/2001 E 51A6 ]6% I ".11 E f 39.11 OCB Re ro re him IN17=01 1 S 47.30 1 78% E ma E S 36.95 OCB re him V2d20011 E 38.22 otal $1,716,328.62 f1.W4.409J5 $ E1,304,409.]5 OCSD Invoice No. 23982 To SAWPA Co%,ednq Period 7/1/01 to 9/30/01 Date of Total Invoke SAWPA's Amount Billed Amount Paid Amount Consultant/Vendor Invoices Invoice Amount Cost Share To SAWPA by SAWPA Outstanding Work Perfomned for Outstanding Amount OCSD Staff Salaries 11/14/2001 $ 23 586.07 76% $ 17,925.41 $ $ 17,925.41 OCSD Staff Overhead 6/2&2002 $ 30 314.39 76% 23,038.95 $ $ 23,038.95 OCSD Contract Staff Labor 11/14/2001 $ 17 859.12 76% $ 13,672.93 $ $ 13 67193 Pettycash 7/19/2001 $ 10.00 76% $ 7.60 $ $ 7.60 Parking fee Refund on permit fees 7/3/2001 $ (1,236.50) 76% $ 939.74 $ $ 939.74 Refund from the State of California Brown&Caldwell 8/28/2001 $ 19 994.27 76% $ 15195.65 $ $ 15195.65 Public Outreach and administration Brown&Caldwell 8/28/2001 $ 12 337.13 76%. $ 9,376.22 $ $ 9,376.22 L&M:Aerial Mapping and Photogrammetry;NCG: Public Outreach;REC: Boundary Survey Jamison En ineerin 7/20/2001 11 DS2.66 76% $ 8,407.62 $ $ 8.407.62 Biologist report and staking for proposed roads Jamison Engineering 8/15/2001 $ 16 778.48 76% 12 751.64 $ $ 12 751.64 Surveying and research on Santa Ana Suckers RBF Consultant 7/27/2001 $ 23 333.00 76% $ 17 733.08 $ 17 733.08 Field surveys at critical locations along SARI line such as pipe depth and changes from N&H's report RBF Consultant 8/24/2001 15 936.00 76% $ 12111.36 $ 12111.36 Field surveys at critical locations along SARI line such as pipe depth and changes from N&H's report C.R. Nelson, P.E. 7/27/2D01 $ 2 6DD.00 76% $ 1,976.00 $ $ 1,976.00 Assistance with Permitting process C.R. Nelson, P.E. 8/31/2001 $ 6D0.00 76% $ 456.00 $ 456.00 Assistance with Permitting process C.T, Bathala 8/23/2001 $ 375.00 76% $ 285.00 $ 285.00 Attended presentation to the Board of Directors of SAWPA and responded to questions N M&Smart 8/31/2001 $ 2199.90 76% $ 1671.92 $ 1 671.92 Review and reversed the Memorandum of Understanding multiple times $ 17.53 76% $ 13.32 $ $ 13.32 18.80 76% $ 14.29 $ $ 14.29$ 139.32 76% $ 105.88 $ $ 105.SS $ 12.67 76% $ 9.63 $ $ 9.63 1 $ 16.96 76% $ 12.88 $ $ 12.89 Package sent to Boyle Engineering for PDR reference oral $175,954.80 $133 725.65 $ $133,725.65 OCSD Invoice No. 24442 To SAWPA Coverino Period 10/1/01 to 12/31/01 Date of Total Invoice SAWPA's Amount Billed Amount Paid by Amount Consultant/Vendor Invoices Invoice Amount Cost Share To SAWPA SAWPA Outstandln Work Performed for OutstandingAmount OCSD Staff Salaries 2/5/2002 $ 11 864.49 76% $ 9.017.02 $ $ 9 017.02 Construction Administration,studies,permitting,and inspection OCSD Staff Overhead 2/5/2002 $ 14,637.00 76% $ 11,124.12 $ $ 11,124.12 Overhead to cover benefits and finance depvs time Unocal 76 gas 1121/2001 $ 184.44 76% $ 140.17 $ 140.17 $ PAID Jamison Engineering 10252001 $ 71,643.61 76% $ 54449.14 $ 54449.14 $ PAID Jamison Engineering 11/2/2001 $ 75,423.60 76% $ 57321.94 $ 57321.94 $ PAID Jamison En Ineedn 11/13/2001 $ 49002.30 76% It 37241.75 $ 37241.75 $ PAID Jamison En Ineedn 12/122001 $ 99,954.00 76% $ 76.965.04 $ 7596604 $ PAID Jamison En Ineedn 1/3/2002 $ 18340.20 76% $ 13,938.55 $ 13,938.55 $ PAID Total $341,049.64 $ 259.197.73 $ 239,056.59 $ 20,141.14 OCSD Invoice No. 24443 To SAWPA Coverina Period 10/1/01 to 12/31/01 Date of Total Invoice SAW PA's Amount Billed Amount Paid Amount Consultant(Vendor Invoices Invoice Amount Cost Share To SAWPA by SAWPA Outstandin Work Performed for Outstanding Amount OCSD Staff Salaries 2/5/2002 $ 24 946.51 76% $ 18,959.35 18.959.35 Emergency work,Inspection,design,studies,and permitting OCSD Staff Overhead 2/52002 $ 34 659.00 76% 26 340.85 28 340.85 Benefits and accounting costs OCSD Contract Staff Labor 2/52002 $ 44 294.07 76% $ 33 663.49 $ $ 33 663.49 Emergency work and design FedEx 9/282001 $ 14.71 76% $ 11.18 $ $ 11.18 Package to Brown&Caldwell USPS 921/2001 1,080.00 76% $ 820.80 $ $ s20.80 Postage costs for public outreach newsletter C.R.Nelson P.E. 9282001 2800.00 76% $ 2,128.00 $ $ 2128.00 Assistance with permitting process Jamison Engineering 1122001 $ 18105.33 76% $ 13,760.05 $ $ 13,760,05 Maintenance of roads Brown&Caldwell 12(7/20011 $ 12165.43 76% $ 9.245.73 $ $ 9,245.73 Boyle:permitting; NCG: Public Outreach;Overland:BNSF RR; REC: Boundary Survey Brown&Caldwell 12/42001 $ 42 748.83 76% $ 32,489.11 $ $ 32,489.11 Public outreach,administration,cost estimate H&N,and emergency maintenance Brown&Caldwell 12!/2001 $ 14.309.04 76% $ 10,874.87 $ 7,154.52 $ 3,720.35 Expanded alternatives and emergency maintenance Brown&Caldwell 1272001 $ 5,557.57 76% $ 4,223.75 $ 2,778.79 $ 1,444.96 Emergency maitenance/repair update letter to CAC Woodruff,S radlin&Smart 9/302001 $ 374.60 76% $ 284.70 $ $ 284.70 CEOA,Fish&Game,MOU,and repair and maintenance of SARI line Woodruff, S radlin&Smart 10/312001 $ 63.00 76% .$ 47.88 $ $ 47,88 Researched claim of Gary Yuung.. Woodruff S radlin&Smart 10/312001 $ 1,737.20 76% $ 1,320.27 $ $ 1,320.27 MOU reviews/drafts/development Woodruff,S radlin&Smart 11/302001 $ 2,160.60 76% $ 1,642.05 $ $ 1.642.05 MOU revisions Conference Room Rental 11202001 180.00 76% $ 136.80 90.00 $ 46.80 Rental for meeting with legal counsel and SAWPA Conference Room Rental 11282001 $ 30.00 78% $ 22.80 $ 15.00 $ 7.80 Additional fee for SAW PA/OCSD meeting on SARI MOU oral $205,225.89 $155,971.68 $ 10,038.31 $146.933.37 OCSD Invoice No. 24784 To SAWPA Covedna Period 1/1/02 to 3131/02 Date of Total Invoice SAW PNs Amount Billed Amount Paid Amount Consultant/Vendor Invoices Invoice Amount Cost Share To SAWPA bv SAWPA Ourstandino Work Performed for Outstanding Amount OCSD Staff Salaries 4/24/2002 $ 1,748.16 76% $ 1,327.08 $ $ 1 327.08 Construction Administration OCSD Staff Overhead 4/24/2002 $ 2155.00 76% $ 1,637.81 $ $ 1,637.81 Benefits and accounting costa Unocal 76 nas 12/21/2001 $ 57.32 76% $ 43.56 $ 43.56 $ PAID Uncoal 78 gas 1/22/2002 $ 10.66 76% $ 8.10 $ 8.10 $ PAID Unxal 76 gas 2/212002 $ 22.49 76% $ 17.09 $ 0.38 $ 16.71 Gas for construction Inspection phase Jamison En ineerin 1223/2001 $ 3.844.00 76% $ 2921.44 $ 2629.30 $ PAID Jamison Engineering Retention 12232001 $ 384.40 76% $ 292.14 $ $ PAID OCB Reprographics 12/5/2001 $ 43.30 76% $ 32.91 $ 32.91 PAID OCB Reprographics 12/52001 $ 153.99 7s% $ 117,03 $ 117.03 S PAID OCB Reprographics 12/18/2001 $ 82.61 76% $ 62.78 62.78 $ PAID Verizon Conference Call 1 1/10/20021 $ 80.74 76% $ 61.38 $ $ 61.36 Teleconference between 4 agencies with US Fish and Wildlife,OCSD,and SAWPA as 3 oral $ 7,811.87 $ 5,937.02 $ 2,894.06 $ 3.042.96 OCSD Invoice No. 24785 To SAWPA covering Period 1/1/02 to 3131/02 Dale of Total Invoice SAWPA's Amount Billed Amount Paid Amount Consultant/Vendor Invoices Invoice Amount Cost Share To SAWPA by SAWPA Outstanding Work Performed for Outstanding Amount OCSD Slab Salaries 4t24/2D02 $ 24,049.02 50% $ 12 024.51 $ $ 12,024.51 Design,emergency wark,studies and permitting OCSD Stag Overhead 7/14/2D02 $ 31 387.00 50% $ 15 693.60 $ $ 15 693.50 Benefits and accounting services OCSD Contract Staff Labor 4/24/2002 $ 40.416.74 50% $ 20 208.37 $ It 20.208.37 FedEx 2/28/2002 $ 14.48 60% $ 7.24 $ 7.24 $ PAID OCS Reprographics 11/29/2001 $ 398.72 50% 199.36 $ 199.36 It PAID C.R.Nelson P.E. 12/17/2001 $ 1,200.00 50% $ 600.00 $ $ 600,00 Assisted with permitting process Jamison Engineering 2/24/2002 $ 1,651.42 50% $ 825.71 $ $ 625.71 Removed and reinstall bulkhead Brown&Caldwell 2/24/2002 $ 78 920.92 50%. $ 38 460.46 $ 38 460.48 $ PAID Brown&Caldwell 2(7)2D02 $ 453.83 50% $ 226.92 $ 226.92 $ PAID Brown&Caldwell 1/10/2002 $ 67891.72 5D% $ 33945.86 $ 33945.86 $ PAID Brown&Caldwell 1/15/2002 $ 14 894.39 50% $ 7,447.19 $ 2,863.67 It 4,583.52 NCG: prepared and attended JMC meeting Woodruff S radlin&Smart 1/31/2002 $ 1,528.00 60% $ 764.00 $ $ 764.00 Continued reviewing and revising MOU Woodruff S radlin&Smart 2/28/2002 $ 2,013.00 60% $ 11006.50 $ $ 1,006.50 Continued reviewing and revising MOU Woodruff,S radlin&Smart 12/31/2001 8 987.00 60% $ 493.60 $ $ 493.50 Continued reviewing and revising MOU MOD Technolooles,Inc. 11/24/2001 $ 7100.00 5D% $ 3,550.00 $ $ 3,550.00 Temporary flow monitoring in the SARI line National Plant Services Inc. 11/26/2001 $ 12 898.74 50% $ 6 448.37 $ $ 8 445.37 CCN at Gypsum Canyon and 91 Freeway porlofI Patriot Video Productions 1/15=02 $ 1,098.89 500% 549.45 $ $ 549.45 Conversion of VHS tape Into MPEG Parsons Engineedng 12/30/2001 I $ 4714.90 1 500% $ 2367.45 $ $ 2357.45 jVaIUe Engineering Study oral It 289,616.77 $144,808.39 $ 75,703.51 $ 69,104.88 OCSD Invoice No. 24945To SAWPA Coverina Period 7/1101 to 9/30101 Date of Total Invoke SAWPA% Amount Billed Amount Paid Amount Consultant/Vendor Invokes Itrvoica Amount Cost Share To SAWPA by SAWPA Outstanding Work Performed for Outstanding Amount OCSD Staff Salaries 6/14/2002 $ 4,262.15 76% $ .3 231.64 $ $ 3,231.64 Design and construction inspection OCSD Staff Overhead 6/14/2002 $ 5,262.00 76% $ 3,991.52 $ $ 3,991.52 Benefits and accounting services FedEx 9/7/2001 $ 11.23 76% $ 8.54 $ 8.54 $ PAID FedEx 9/14/P001 $ 11.23 76% $ 8.53 $ 8.53 $ PAID Jamison Engineering 10/3/2001 $46167.29 76% $ 35087.14 $ 35087.14 $ PAID OCB R ro m hits 8/29/2001 $ 69.66 76% $ 52.94 $ 52.94 $ PAID Cal. De t.Fish and Game 5/2/2001 $ 386.38 76%. $ 293.65 $ 293.65 $ PAID Total $56,149.94 $ 42,673.96 $ 35,450.80 $ 7.223.16 OCSD Invoice No. 24946 To SAWPA Covering Period 3/1/01 to 6/30/02 Date of I Total Invoice SAWPA's I Amount Billed I Amount Paid I Amount Work Performed for Consultant/Vendor Invoices Invoical Amount lCostSharel To SAWPA I b SAWPA lOutstandino Outstandirm Amount PAID IN FULL oral $ $ $ $ OCSD Invoice No. 25041 To SAW PA Coverto Penoo3/trol to Sr3WO2 Dale of Total lorroim SAWPXs Amount Billed Amwnt Paid Amount ComullanU Vendor lmrolees Invoice Amount Cost Sherd To SAWPA bySAWPA Work Pedonned for Oulslanding Amount OCSD Staff Salaries 6/29/2002 $ W,075.73 50% S 15037,86 $ $ 15.037.86 OCSD Staff Ov Mwd 6/29/2002 $ XseliW 50% $ 16R62.W $ $ 16 W OCSD Contact Staff tabor 6011t W2 $ 23047.01 50% $ 11 .W S $ 11.5 w Pe cash-oreelin lunch S 80.00 SO% S 40.00 S $ fom Patty cash-naegn lwwh Y W.w 50% 45,00 $ $ 4 w FedFx 4/3MM $ 14.58 50% $ 7.29 $ $ 7.29 Package to Eldon Horst Fella 5/i/20D2 $ 31.W SD% $ Ism $ $ 15.0 Package to Brown&Caldwell OCS Rommolos 4124/2002 $ 3.91 50% $ 1.96 $ S 1.96 MD Teolnolo les lx 329/2002 $ 1 1W.W 50% $ 9.M.W $ S 9.OW.W Temporary Flow Mwltodrg HP wirer, 31U 2 $ 145.W am $ 72W S $ 72.W Spent t hour Will SARI CEOA wmpllanoe WootlMl S adlin&Smart 3t31/2002 $ 84.W 50% S 4240 E S 42.40 COngwed WN MOU Wocdrufl S mdlin&Soren 4IJ0/1W2 S 3Sw SO% S 19.W $ $ 19.W Revlemd SAWPNs draft deal points Woodmll,S retllin&Sorvt 531/2002 $ 14&40 50% $ 74.W $ $ ]4.Wl.eoketl al SAWPNs purchase of SAfll line WooimBSadlin B Sloan w1/2002 $ 63W 60% S 31.W $ S 31.0 Congnuetl Wm MOU Court ofO a 7/1/2002 $ 4MW 50% $ 238.W $ S 238.W Ranew/update permit for mwitonng wells Court ofO 7/1/2W2 $ 752W Si $ 376.W $ $ Vefso RanawNpdate permit for mwiloing wells B.&Caldwell 328w2002 $ 59.979.03 50% S 29.989.52 $29 989.52 $ AlMmelives aralyels,disk analysis,antl eorergerwy maimwence Brown&Caldwell 4/flt2W2 S S65251 50% $ 3MM $ 1539.52 Y 1766,74 NCG Porter Novelli Brown&Caldwell 5/2/W02 $ 47518.15 50% $ 23759.06 $23.7W.08 $ ExpandW Allemallves,Risk Analysis,and Emergency Melnlenewe Brown 8 Celtlwag 5/8/2W2 $ 28,841.46 50% $ 13,3W.73 E 74W.01 $ 5.9W.]2 HBA:CpnslmCllon Estimate;Boyle:pamtlltlng;H.Charp:paniapaew w Expert Panel;p EDAMM-C�ubad: rt Panel Broom&Caldwell 5w26/2002 $ 21096.45 50% $ 10.548.23 $ 10549.23 $ Expanded Altemalives,Risk Analysis,Atltlirbnal Pudic Oulmaoh,soul Emergency Mainlenen Brawn&Caldwell 5/20/2002 5 54729.31 50% $ 27.381.66 $ 10,1W.51 $ 17,254.15 H&A Cwsl uclien Eslimate,NCG:P.R.eflans;J.Massorann:paNcipatlon an Expert Panel; gan Panel;M-Cubad:Panfoialion on Expert PanelBrovm&Celdwell 8r11/2002 E 22,167.62 50% S 11083W f 953446 S 1549.34 ExpantleO Agemetiveq Rlsk Anelyele,PlMmagve n, Atlditlonel Publle Oukeaoh,antl Em Brown&Caldwell 6/11/2002 $ 6,9W.82 50% $ 3,485.W f 238340 $ 1.OB1.W B&C:Expert panel workshop reports;NCG:JMC antl CAC c,krd. oral $355425.44 $M.71212 $ 95,261.73 $ S245099 OCSD Invoice No. 25760 To SAWPA Covering Period 7/1102 to 9/30/02 Date of Total Invoice SAW PA's Amount Billed Amount Paid Amount Consultant/Vendor Invoices Invoice Amount Cost Share To SAWPA SAWPA Outstanding Work Performed for Outstanding Amount OCSD Staff Salaries 11/20/2002 $ 15199.39 50% 7,599.69 $ 7599.69 OCSD Staff Overhead 11/20/2002 $ 13477.00 50% $ 6.738.50 6738.50 OCSD Contract Staff Labor 11/20/2002 $ 25 005.11 50% $ 12,502.55 12 502.55 OCB Reprographics 5/7/2002 $ 21.27 50% $ 10.64 $ 10.64 $ OCB Reprographics 5/15/2002 $ 25.70 50% $ 12.85 $ 12.85 $ OCB Repmraphics 7/25/2002 $ 13.99 50% $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ OCS Reproaraphim 7/29/2002 120.41 50% $ 60.21 $ 60.21 $ Woodruff,S radlin&Smart W30/2002 $ 257.70 50% $ 128.85 $ 128.85 Revlaw Brown&Caldwell's addenda numbers 1,2,and draft 3 Woodruff,S radlin&Smart 7/31/2002 $ 41.00 50% $ 20.50 $ 20.50 Review letter to SAWPA re:sale of SARI Woodruff, S radlin&Smart 7/31/2002 $ 18.60 50% $ 9.30 $ $ 9.30 Conference re:exhibit to MOU Brown&Caldwell 7/24/2002 $ 13650.50 50% $ 6925.25 $ 6,825.25 $ Risk analysis and alternative report Brown&Caldwell 7/22QO02 $ 8139.38 50% $ 3,069.68 $ 3,069.68 $ NCG:CAC and open house meetings otal $ 73,970.05 $ 36,985.02 $ 9,985.63 $ 26,999.39 Vi.Ai,L Wdaoaa,Dircttoi J?�{ a OpZ 300 N.Fkwxr su=r Y COUNTY OF ORANGE Sann Ana,CA o P.U. BOX 4048 U n Sanra.\na, PUBLIC FitCILITIES&RESOURCES DEP.iRTLlE.VT CA 92702-IWS c�<<e04�,! Tdcphene: (714)834-2300 Fss: (714)834.3188 December 12.2002 Mr.Brian Moore, Deputy District Engineer Programs& Project Management Division USACE, Los Angeles District P.O.Box 532711 Los Angeles,CA 90053.2325 Subject: Santa Ana River Interceptor Line Protection Dear Mr. Moore: We were informed in your letter dated June 12.2002 that the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI)line needed to be protected prior to the completion of the new Prado Dam Outlet Works,which is scheduled for completion in September 2005. We were also informed that the Corps of Engineers (Corps) needed to be informed no later than August 2003 of our interest to include the work in the Corps' Reach 9-Second Phase contract. In accordance with Article II, C. of the LCA,we recognize our responsibility as the Local Sponsor to provide for the protection and relocation of utilities such as the SARI line. This is to inform the Corps that the Orange County Flood Control District(OCFCD) intends to request the Corps assume the lead role for designing the SARI Line Protection Project within the fioodway and for administering its construction contract. The OCFCD is curentiy having discussions with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)and Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD), to determine the preferred alternative for protecting or relocating the SARI line. Presently, Mere are eight alternatives undergoing additional engineering analysis by OCSD's consultant. In addition, a consultant has been commissioned by OCSD to complete an EIRIEIS for certification by the Corps for the project. We are hopeful that an alternative can be selected by February 2003. We will keep your staff informed of the project's status and would welcome the Corps'participation in the alternative selection and EIRIEIS preparation process. Should you have any questions regarding the SARI line project,please have your staff contact Lance Natsuhara at(714)834-5398 or Ahmed Olomi at (714) 834-2968. Sincerely, Kenneth R. Smith Director Public Works/Chief Engineer S'.LARP LUnce NatsuhmiSARI U.Corps Co illft n.doo cc: Herb Nakasone, Manager, Flood Control Division Joe Grindstaff, General Manager, SAWPA Blake Anderson, General Manager, OCSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING December 18, 2002-7:00 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Aoencv Active Director Alternate Director Anaheim Shirley McCracken Bob Hernandez Fountain Valley John Collins Larry R. Crandall Stanton Brian Donahue David Shawver Villa Park Robert McGowan Richard Freschi Yorba Linda Michael Duvall Ken Lynn Wilson GAwp.dUUgenda\Bmrd AgendasV002 Board AgendaM121802 supplemenUlAw f MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, December 11,2002, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 11, 2002, at 5:00 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Brian Brady, Chair Mike White, Controller Roy Moore, Vice Chair Greg Mathews, Administrative Services Manager Mark Leyes Doug Stewart,Asset Management Program Joy Neugebauer Manager James W. Silva Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Steve Anderson,Vice Board Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Absent: Don Hughes Toby Weissert Bill Kennedy (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair had no report. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 December 11, 2002 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported on a meeting held earlier that day for special districts in Orange County to discuss state budget issues and potential vulnerability to the District's portion of the property tax revenue,which is approximately$35 million,and designated "reserve"funds. Chair Brady requested an agenda item be prepared for the February 2003 meeting to direct staff to optimize the district's management of reserves to maintain maximum protection from confiscation by the state. Mr. Anderson also reported on several other items: The possible development of a legislative proposal to modify Proposition 218 to provide an exemption for fees associated with urban runoff treatment programs; a public infrastructure funding ballot measure that is scheduled to appear on the March 2004 ballot state-wide,which earmarks a part of the general fund towards public Infrastructure improvements; and,the possible expansion of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's oversight authority as it relates to biosolids management programs. He also discussed his participation as a member of the board of directors of the Orange County Business Council and as a member of the Orange County Coastkeepers, and the reasons for his participation in the groups. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance was not present. Mike White, Controller, referred to the Treasurer's Report that was distributed to the Directors that evening, and reported that one of the two securities that had previously fallen below the District's investment policy rating requirements has been sold at 100.82% of par. The other security is an asset-backed security issued by United Airlines, who has now filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. Pacific Investment Management Company(PIMCO), the District's external money manager, has advised District staff not to sell the security at this time as they believe the underlying value of the airplanes securing the asset is greater than the current market value of the security. PIMCO will continue to monitor this security very closely. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources was not present. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present (9) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The Chair ordered that the November 13, 2002 minutes for the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved, as mailed. b. FAHR02-107: Receive and file Treasurels Report for the month of November 2002. C. FAHR02-108: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. d. FAHR02-109: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of November 27, 2002. _ Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting i Page 3 December 11, 2002 e. FAHR02-110: Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. f. FAHR02-111: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing policies. g. FAHR02-112: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD- , Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33,Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for adoption of Policy No. E90.00, Internet and Electronic Mail Usage. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly canted to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 9(a)through (g) under Consent Calendar. Directors Brian Brady and Jim Silva abstained on Item 9(a). END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR02-113: Approve the 2003/04 Budget Assumptions, Fiscal Policy Statements, and Budget Calendar. Mike White, Controller, gave a brief verbal report reviewing the budget assumptions and the process of developing the 2003/2004 budget. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended action. b. FAHR02-114: R ecommend to the Board of Directors to approve a change order to the purchase order contract to appoint Moreland &Associates as the District's Independent auditors for fiscal year 2002-03 in an annual amount not to exceed $47,800,and not to exceed $49,700 for fiscal year 2003-04. Mike White, Controller, gave a brief report for the need to renewal the existing contract with Moreland &Associates, indicating the District has been pleased with their past service. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. f Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting 1 Page 4 December 11, 2002 (11) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR02-116 Asset Management Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis Doug Stewart,Asset Management Program Manager, reported on the findings of Phase 1, and described the steps to be taken for development and implementation of Phase 2. (12) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT Then:were none. (14) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2003 at 5 p.m. (15) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:49 p.m. Submitted by: �/ O'',j )A ):�w Penny M < le FAHR Co ittee Secre Giwp.dtaWgendaXFAHRWAHR20D212002 Mlnutesk111302 FAHR Mfnutea.doc 1 117 Date To BE.of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 12/11/02 12/la oz AGENDA REPORT 11ernNumbef RmNuiber FAHR02-107 14(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator. Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2002 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of November 2002. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Liquid Operating Monies and on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for of the Long-Term Operating Monies, there is an investment policy compliance issue pertaining to the holding of two securities that had an acceptable rating at the time of purchase but have since fallen below the minimum rating allowed by the investment policy. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P. with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The first security is the holding of$1 million par of the Public Service Co. of Colorado corporate bond with an April 2003 maturity, whose rating with S&P has remained at BBB+ by S&P, but has fallen with Moody's from A3 to BAA1. This security was sold in November at 100.82 percent and is no longer contained within the District's investment portfolio. The second compliance issue pertains to the holding of a United Airlines (UAL)Asset Backed Security whose rating from Moody's has fallen several times, from A3 to BA1, then to BA3, and finally to B3. Likewise, the rating from Standard & Poor's has also fallen several times, first from A-to BBB, then to BB, then to B+, and finally to B-. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District again would suffer an unwarranted loss if this security was G�Aq N Appal P %IMSppn 14(CI 11EASRK. Page 1 sold. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of"credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The following table details the book balances of the District's investment accounts at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown on the attached bar chart. G:Mp 4taW6andaTARRWARRzoo2UW2 AWnda ft�SW AOTTAeAse Ar Page 2 i♦ Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts October 31,2002 Yield(%) State of Card. LAIF $ 20,554,840 2.30 Union Bank Checking Account (315.482) N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 0.68 PIMCO—Short-tens Portfolio 43,927,085 3.10 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 313,388,265 5.10 Debt Service Reserves w7Twstees 35,431,120 4,50 Petty Cash 5,000 N/A TOTAL 5412 agn N98 ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:IC G:%deu OP NTAHWAHPUDO=WZ Ape Re�WI o7.TRElSXPr M[ Page 3 \ O\O\ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �imm����iii� uummuuuiiii� immag am ON/Ell 11 111 111 �itt'p't."';�ii�ip;Yi...{�ti :'.r,. Cq<.'�^+y •; 7 ...•,.,.::.�>:T:>:>:::� }. v.• l� '•mil.•:.+, ��Y•!•A1• A 1 M1111{ lh�•lf1�J. i411•,�1 `•ffflfjO, Nhyj N>! fib.• /.•:;:#::5� � %•}rr}.. �:x.x.. P Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund November 30, 2002 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance November 1, 2002 $18,054,840 $18,064,840 $18,064,840 2.30 2.30 Deposits. 11/27/2002 14,100,D00 14,100,000 14,100,000 2.30 2.30 Withdrawals: 11/7/2002 (2,300,000) (2,300,000) (2,300,000) 2.30 2.30 11/13/2002 (800,000) (800,000) (800,000) 2.30 2.30 11/20/2002 (8,500,000) (8,500,000) (8,500,000) 2.30 2.30 Total Wthdrawls (11,600,000) (11,600,000) (11,600,000) 2.30 2.30 Balance November 30,2002 $20,554,840 $20,654,840 820,684,840 2.30 2.30 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 71WESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 2002) Page 1 of 2 Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $44,267,834 • Mellon $44,270,457 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $44,513,533 • Mellon $44,519,184 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.19 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact int[oss oft%Change: $84109 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0ah 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturiniz within 90 days: 79% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality AAA^ 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%a)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.26 0.13 3 Months: 0.56 0.41 12 Months: 2.29 1.75 Year-to-Date: 2.08 1.58 Commentary Int,restrmes W the dronendoftheyleW curse deaeasedduringthe mash(3m uhT-lies k1123 basis pointsW 121%),while toga mamdties increased(30iear Treasuries rose 5 baits point,to 5.04%). TM liquid portfolio aaperfamed the bcmhnwk by 13 bests points duringthe math,and by47 bails poims yevdadnc. P11ACV,emphasis on higheryieldingsecuririessuch a canmemial papa end shmt4em r cnhaoedmtums,but same shantemr carpaak issues expcdencudprkedeclims m crtdltwncerns mounted. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 2002) Page 2 of 2 *Compliance Issues: $1 million par of Public Service Co. of Colorado (744448BJ9),6.0%coupon,4/15/2003 maturity,representing 2.3%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis,was purchased on 6/28/2002 with ratings of BBB+by S&P and A3 by Moody's. It was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAAI on 9/6/2002 while the S&P rating has remained unchanged. The District's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating,at the time of purchase. This security was sold in November 2002 at a price of 100.82 percent. C:M'P4uNe V]ONhIMTrtunry M�mILLIQOBOP0Y11.RIT.Je 1, • A' MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (far the month ended 30 November 2002) Page I of Long-Term Operating Monles(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $316,327,482 • Mellon $316,228,959 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $306,090,195 • Mellon $306,604,714 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.36 Of Index: 2.36 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact a Wloss of 1%Change: $7 465 329 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 11% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No- r RTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%a)by Portfolio Index Period: l Month: -0.46 -0.16 3 Months: 0.83 1.10 12 Months: 6.08 6.07 Year-ta-Date: 6.43 6.30 • Threemonth yields declined duringthe month(90day T-Bias fell 23 basis points to 1.21%)while longer matudtiesincremed(5-yesrTremuryNotesroa 54 basis points to 3.27%). • The lung-Tenn ponfolio smiled the benchmark by 30 bmis point dudngthe month,but outperformed the benchmark by 13 basis points yurlo�dme. • Porafclio dumtim won neumalm the benchmark. • A bmader-Nanindex yield curve pmitimingwm negative for performance as longerdatedsecurities suffered price declines as intermediate and long mans rose. • Mortgage-backed wesuisiesmo,neubal for perfarmmce,as the corporate sects rebounded sumgly duringthe month. • An underswight allocation to corporates detrectedfmm performance as the corporate sector reboundedurongly during the month. • Holdings ofTreasurymd Agencysecurifiesvemnegatixc fmperfmmmn.wthe"Bightloquagty'mvemedin November. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BWESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING ((or the month ended 30 November 2002) Page 2 of 3 'Compliance Issues; $1,600,000 par of United Airlines Pass-Through 2001-1-C(909317BC2),6.831%coupon,9/l2008 maturity,representing 0.5%of the portfolio holdings-was purchased on 81102001;and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAl (on 9/182001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 9202001). The security was funkier downgraded by Moodys from BAI to BA3(on I2t212001)and by S&P from BBB to BB(on 628102). Following news of the possible bankruptcy filing,the security was further downgraded in August(B3 Moody's,B+by S&P). On November 29,2002,S&P guidelines downgraded this issue to B,and shortly thereafter on December 9, 2002,downgraded the issue one notch further to B-. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split On December 5,2002,the Air Transportation Stabilization Board(ATSB)rejected United's request for a$1.5 billion Into guarantee.Although the company had made progress in gaining wage concessions from its various employee unions,the ATSB doubted the reasonableness of United's business plan,especially given the current economic environment. In response,the airline submitted its much-anticipated filing for Chapter I I bankruptcy protection on Monday,December 9th.United's filing is the largest bankruptcy ever in the global airline industry,resulting from high costs and low airfares that have plagued the industry since"9/11". United simultaneously renewed its campaign to cut its costs,by announcing it will reduce pay for all officers by about I I%a starting next week and trim wages for salaried and management employees by 2.8 to 10.7%. United will also begin fresh talks with unions about how they will contribute to the cost cutting. United said it now has approximately $800 million in unrestricted cash on hand and$600 million in restricted cash. To help the airline meet its bills,the banlauptcyjudge approved an initial$800 million in interim financing,part of the$1.5 billion in debtor-in-possession financing the carrier arranged with lenders to see it through the bankruptcy. With respect to the UAL holding,PIMCO's recommendation for the issue has not changed,even in light of recent events. They are of the opinion that the spread, collateral,and issuer liquidity all point to continuing to hold the security. The following points provide basis for their recommendation: • The collateral underlying the bonds is good(very young planes,medium to high aircraft diversification,loan-to-value ratio is 60-750/6,etc.). • PIMCO believes liquidation values continue to be much higher than reflected in current market prices. Current pricing levels overstate the risks. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. If anything changes that would prompt them to revise their recommendation on the inclusion of the security within the portfolio,they will let us know to take appropriate action. Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: •$4,500,000 par of Daimler Chrysler securities(cusip 233835AM9),maturing on December 16,2002,representing 1.4%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 1 0/3 12 0 0 1 by S&P fi om A-to BBB+;and now carry a Moody's rating of A3. The District investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$9,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities(345397GV9,345397RV7,345397SJ3,345397SR5),maturing at various dates in 2003,2004,and 2005,represents 2.8% of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;and now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade from A2 on 1/162002 and an S&P rating of BBB after a further downgrade from BBB+on 10252002. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A.by S&P,with at least a BBB in the event of a split rating. •$11,750,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(370425QV5,37042WE80,37042WZK0),maturing in 2003,represents 3.7%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+,with a further downgrade to BBB occurring on 10/162002;but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A2. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. l MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 November 1001) Page 3 of 3 •$3,000,000 par of Baltimore Gas&Electric securities(059165DN7),maturing in 2012,represents 0.9%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The security was downgraded on 7/18/2002 by S&P from A to BBB+,but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A2. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$3,500,000 par of Virginia Electric Power NT securities(cusip 927804EN0),maturing in 2006,represents 1.1%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The security was downgraded on 10/21/2002 by S&P from A-to BBB+,but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A3. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. G:IwP.dMi/!nl]]OIwMhl7Yrerury MgmaL-Ta8a0.01-t I.RPT.doc Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE.! 1 NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY BASE: USD OCSF07511102 30-NOV-2002 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 6,279,370.50 6,279,370.50 14.18% 0.00 U.S.GOVERNMENTS-LESS THIN IYR 99,921.98 99,921.88 0.23% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 7,452,905.44 7,452,905.44 16.83% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 7,899,142.38 7,899,142.39 17.94% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 4,290,231.81 4,290,231.81 9.69% 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 36.49 36.48 0.00% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 62,825.60 62,825.60 0,14% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 26,084,434.09 26,084,434.09 58.92% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 26,084,434.09 26,084,434.09 58.92% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 6,219,531.25 6,060,000.00 13.69% -159,531.25 U.S.AGENCIES 6,170,555.81 6,144,693.04 13.88% -25,862.77 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 99,921.88 100,001.00 0.23% 79.12 BANKING&FINANCE 5,601,369.49 5,537,957.19 12.31% -63,412.30 TOTAL UNITED STATES 18,094378.43 17,842,651.23 40.300/. -248.727.20 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 18,091,378.43 17,942,651.23 40.30% -248,727.20 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 343,371.91 343,371.91 0,78% 0.00 TOTAL 343,371.91 343,371.91 0.78% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 343,371.91 343,371.91 0.78% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS N,519,184.43 44,270,457.23 100.00% -248,727.20 10-Dec.2002 15:15:53 Exemttw Warkbe,xk Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 7 NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY BASE. USD OCSF075222002 30-NOV-2002 FINAL LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 47,583.17 47,583.17 0.02% 0.00 PAYA13LES -34,243,437.50 -34,243,437.50 -10.83% 0.00 TOTAL -34,195,854.33 .34,195,854.33 -10,81% 0.00 UNITED STATES FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 9,061,47&67 9,061,476.67 2.87% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 216,821.02 216,821.02 0.07% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 9,278,297.69 9,278,297.69 2.93% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS -24,917,556.64 -24,917556.64 -7.88% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 134,591,145.89 135,999,524.26 43.01% 1,408,378.37 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,386,365.27 34,712,756.88 10.98% 5,326,391.61 U.S.AGENCIES 46,392,262.76 48,921,742.47 15.47% 2,529,479.71 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 18,294,366.37 19,733,946.68 5.92% 439,580.31 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 6,955,964.49 7,141,019.57 2.26% 185,055.08 FHLMC POOLS 693,478.94 695,162.60 0.22% 1,683.66 FHLMC MULTICLASS 3,581,892.07 3,639,645.05 1.15% 57,752.98 FNMA POOLS 20,749,375.00 20,679,600.00 6.54% .69,775.00 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 3,242,952.57 3,476,815.36 1.10% 233,962.79 ABS:CAR LOAN 254,833.99 251,059.75 0.08% -3,774.24 A13S:AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.00 644,960.00 0.20% -955,040.00 BANKING&.FINANCE 30,680,594.50 31,017,837.00 9.91% 337,242.50 INDUSTRIAL 17,266,985.00 17,303,167.00 5.47% 36,192.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 11,627,710.00 11,986,105.00 3.79% 358,395.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 3,063,750.00 3,102,480.00 0.99% 38,730.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 328,381,576.85 339,305,821.62 106.98% 9,924,244.77 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 328,381,576.85 338,305,821.62 106.98% 9,924,244M OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 10-1)ec-2002 15:18.26 EeecuMve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 2 BASE: 1JSD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-NOV-2002 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 2,840,694.24 2,840,694.24 0.90% 0.00 TOTAL 2,840,694.24 2,840,694.24 0.90% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 2,940,694.24 2,940,694.24 0."% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 306,304,714.45 316,228,959.22 100.00% 9,924,244.77 I&Drc-2002 15:1&26 Faecutive Wdrkbench - YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07511102 2002/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/02 DISTRICT. LIQUID OPERATING ROM TIM 10.55.45 PAR VALUE YIN AT CONSENT MOODY SANEST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MAREET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASE 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 100,000.00 STUDENT IN MARKETING ASSN STN .000 1.262 P-1 99.922 99,921.88 .38 86387THU5 VAR AT 03/20/2003 DO 09/19/02 A-1+ 99,921.88 .23 62,825.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOST .000 1.157 AAA 100.000 62,825.60 .24 996085247 AAA 62,825.60 .14 36.48 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT .100 .100 100.000 36.48 .00 996087094 36.48 .00 1,916,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN HIS COMP DISC 1.252 .000 P-1 99.854 1,913,205.83 3.33 313396AB9 NAT 01/02/2003 A-1+ 1,913,205.83 4.36 500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 1.253 .000 P-1 99.785 490,923.61 1.91 313598AX3 HAT 01/22/2003 A-1+ 499,923.61 1.14 1,680,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 2.253 .000 P-1 99.I60 1,675,975.00 6.42 313588BE4 MAT O1/2912003 A-1+ 1,675,975.00 3.82 1,800,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 1.291 .000 WE 99.925 1,798,645.50 6.89 97665SMI 12/12/2002 1,798,645.50 4.09 1,500,000.O0 RRAFT FOODS INC DISC 1.293 .00D 99.735 1,496,022.50 5.73 5009M1MU3 01/28/2003 1,496,022.50 3.41 2,565,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BR MKS DISC 1.302 .000 P-1 99.827 2,560,555.67 9.81 313384AH2 MAT O1/08/2003 A-1+ 2,560,555.67 5.83 550,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MID ASSN DISCOUNT 1.306 .000 P-1 99.574 547,656.39 2.09 313588DP9 MAY 03/19/2003 A-1+ 547,656.39 1.25 1,902,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MID ASSN DISC 1.308 .ODD P-1 99.397 1,890,529.88 7.24 313588FG5 05/07/2003 A-3+ 1,090,529.88 4.30 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL MOM LN MTO CORP DISC 1.505 .ODD P-1 99.I00 997,000.00 3.82 313396AR4 WAY 01/16/2003 A-1+ 997,000.00 2.27 1,736,ODO.00 FEDERAL BOWS IN BR CONS DISC 1.666 .000 P-1 99.636 1,729,676.14 6.63 313384AQ2 MAT O1/15/2003 A-1+ 1,729,676.14 3.94 1,500,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 1.I0I .000 P-1 99.589 1,493,837.50 5.72 07588SH66 01/06/2003 1,493,837.50 3.40 YLDAKAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 MOP07511102 2002/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/02 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE t 10.55.45 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE HARKEY VALUE 4 TOTE. 1,500,000.00 ANKBICAN BE OR CP DISC 1.751 .000 99.391 1,490,865.00 5.71 025818HM7 O1/2212003 1,490,865.00 3.39 4,560,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MTG CORD DISC 2.109 .000 P-1 99.621 4,542,699.61 10.41 313397SOS MAT 12/12/2002 A-1+ 4,542,699.61 10.34 3,300,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTU ASSN DISCOUNT 4.629 .000 P-1 99.517 3,286,057.30 12.59 313589U43 NET 12/24/2002 A-I+ 3,206,057.50 3.48 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 1.424 .020 26,084,434.09 100.00 26,084,434.09 59.39 PIxED INCOME SECURITIES 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH SR HT .000 1.853 "1 100.146 1,502,520.00 8.41 046003KNI PLTG RT OS/08/2003 DD 05/08/00 AA- 1,502,190.00 3.42 125,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL STE ABBE EYE .000 1.511 AAA 100.031 124,960.94 .70 3136POYN6 VAR AT 02/21/2003 DO 08/21/01 AAA 125,030.75 .28 100,000.00 STUDENT LN RABBETING A88N HIS .000 1.261 AAA 100.001 99,921.8E .56 8638ITH80 VAR RT O1/16/2003 DO 07/19/02 AAA 100,001.00 .23 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN ME CORP DOES 1.454 4.420 AAA 101.656 1,018,200.00 5.69 3134A4FF6 4.500E 06/15/2003 DD 06/15/01 AAA 1,016,560.00 2.31 2,000,000.00 PIDERAL ROM6 LE BE CONS BOB 1.513 4.419 AAA 101.844 2,039,880.00 11.41 3133MG5.I1 4.500E 07/07/2003 DD 07/06/01 AAA 2,036,880.00 4.64 100,000.00 FED ROM LN MG CORD DEB 1.535 6.128 AAA 101.500 101,807.00 .56 313400=6 6.220E 03/24/2003 DD 03/24/93 AAA 101,500.00 .23 100,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BOB CONS BD 1.551 5.942 ARE 100.969 101,262.00 .56 3133M3ES4 6.000E 02/18/2003 DD 02/18/98 AAA 100,969.00 .23 150,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR HER CONS EYE 1.664 6.323 AAA 103.590 155,796.00 .8I 31331NE59 6.550E O8/19/2003 DO 08/19/96 AAA 155,385.00 .35 100,000.00 FEDERAL ROMB LN BE CONS BOB 1.664 5.747 ARE 103.094 103,311.00 .5I 3133M55B2 5.925% 08/14/2003 DD 08/14/98 AAA 103,094.00 .23 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 MBF07511102 2002/11/30 ROD DATE 12/06/02 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING ROD TIRE 1 10.55.45 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MEANT TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE RABBET VALUE E TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 1,000,D00.00 MORGAN STANLEY DW NEW 92200349 1.757 6.071 AA3 1D3.703 1,045,350.00 5.81 61745EOD4 7.125E 08/15/2003 DD 08/10/00 AA- 1,037,030.00 2.36 466,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HTG ASSN DEBS 1.810 4.964 AAA 100.719 471,764.42 2.63 31359MEA4 5.000E 02/14/2003 DO 02/23/01 AAA 469,350.54 1.07 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LN BE CONS BDS 1.851 4.957 AAA 1DO.B75 1,011,250.00 5.65 3133MDUE7 5.000E 02/29/2003 DO 02/20/01 AAA 2,000,750.00 2.30 100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL WTO ASSN MTN 1.917 6.546 AAA 102.507 102,765.00 .57 31364CDD7 6.710E 05/21/2DO3 DD 05/21/96 AAA 102,507.00 .23 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO NEW NY 1.949 7.039 AA2 102.292 560,601.00 3.09 94974DCH5 7.200E 05/01/2003 DD 04/26/00 A+ 552,376.80 1.26 400,000.00 BOATHBNS BANCSHARES INC SUB 2.260 6.659 AA3 101.367 411,460.00 2.27 096650AE6 6.750E 03/15/2003 DO 03/15/93 A 405,466.00 .92 610,000.OD FEDERAL BOMB IN BR CONS BDB 2.270 5.103 AAA 100.438 622,102.40 3.43 3133HCUE3 5.125E 01/13/2003 DD 01/12/01 AAA 612,671.80 1.39 195,000.00 FEDERAL DOWN LN BE CONS BUB 2.270 5.632 AAA 100.500 219,594.20 1.09 3133M2A56 5.660E 01/13/2003 DO 01/13/98 AAA 195,975.00 .45 100,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN HE CONS BOB 2.296 5.577 AAA 100.590 102,392.00 .56 3133M2307 5.610E 01/23/2003 DO 01/23/90 AAA 100,590.00 .23 500,000.0D NERRILL LYNCH 6 CO BONDS 2.351 5.952 AA3 100.909 508,160.00 2.82 590100834 6.000E 02/12/2003 DD 02/12/98 A+ 504,045.00 1.15 324,000.00 HAMANNRICA CORD SHE NT 2.372 6.701 AA3 102.596 336,312.00 1.86 066050BE7 6.875E 06/01/2DO3 DD 06/01/93 A 332,411.04 .76 61000.000.00 U B TREASURY NOTES 2.522 6.189 AAA 101.000 6,219,531.25 33.96 912827578 06.250E 02/15/2003 DD 02/15/93 AAA 6,060,000.00 13.80 250,ODO.00 DONALDSON LUPKIN 4TR 00039E 2.614 7.053 AA3 100.234 257,995.00 1.40 25766CBQ6 7.070E 12/29/2002 DO 12/13/99 A+ 250,585.00 .57 193,000.00 PITWEY BONES CR COST BY 2.723 8.679 AA3 101.395 203,794.49 1.09 724477MO 8.800E 02/15/2003 DD 02/12/91 AA 195,692.35 .45 15,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BKS CONS BD 2.751 5.836 AAA 102.813 15,470.85 .08 3133N4VC4 6.000E 07/14/2003 DD 07/14/98 AAA 15,421.95 .04 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 MSF07511102 2002/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/02 DISTRICT. LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 10.55.45 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARMMT VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ -------- ______-_-- 150,000.00 MEERILL LYSCE 3.107 6.791 AA3 101.238 135,247.00 .85 590188EP9 6.8754 03/01/2003 A+ 131,857.00 .35 200,000.00 DEAN HITTER DISCOVER 6 CO 3.144 6.788 AA3 101.285 206,866.00 1.13 24240VMS 6.8754 03/01/2003 A+ 202,570.00 .46 400,000.OD NATURAL RURAL UITLS COOP FIN 3.240 7.307 Al 100.933 413,064.00 2.26 637432CX9 7.375% 02/10/2003 DO 02/10/00 A+ 403,732.00 .92 ________ _______ _________ ------- TOTAL FIXED IMCONE SECURITIES 1.561 4.809 18,093,37B.43 100.00 17,842,651.23 40.63 ________ _______ ---------------- --------- TOTAL 1.505 2.870 44,175,812.52 100.00 43,927,085.32 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 5 O BF00522202 2002/11/30 RUN DATE x 12/06/02 DISTRICT. LONG-TERN OPERATING RON TIME . 10.55.45 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL C0ST/ A TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION DOOR YIELD S-P PRICE ERRANT VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASE 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 9,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.577 9,061,476.67 93.66 313588DN2 NAT 03/26/2003 A-1+ 9,061,476.67 2.61 216,821.D2 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE MET .000 1.153 AAA 100.000 216,821.02 2.33 996085247 AAA 216,821.02 .06 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASE 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS .000 .014 9,278,297.69 100.00 9,278,290.69 2.67 FIXED INCOM SECURITIES 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUN FNMA SP MG .000 5.371 AAA 102.406 3,079,687.50 .90 O1F0524C3 5.500% 12/01/2017 OD 12/01/02 AAA 3,072,180.00 .88 15.000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR PNNA SP MTG .000 5.380 AAA 103.612 15,605,625.00 4.60 OIP0604C6 6.000% 12/01/2017 DO 12/01/02 AAA 15,571,000.00 4.48 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FDA FNMA BP MTG .000 S.B73 AAA 102.151 5,143,750.00 1.50 01P0606C4 6.000% 12/01/2032 DO 12/01/02 AAA 5,107,000.00 1.40 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO POR OEM SP MG .000 6.254 AAA 103.939 10,414,375.00 3.07 OIN0626CI 6.500E 12/15/2032 DO 12/01/02 AAA 10,393,800.00 2.99 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN 4 TR 00459 .000 1.691 A2 100.210 899,406.00 .26 003928VC4 FLED RT 12/01/2003 DO O8/13/01 A 901,962.00 .26 4,500,000.00 DAISIES. CBRYSLER NA CORP UT .000 2.596 A3 100.015 4,491,345.00 1.33 233835AM9 FLYG AT 12/16/2002 DO 12/15/00 M. 4,500,675.00 1.29 393,381.11 DISTRIBUTION PINL 99-1 CL A4 .000 5.343 1D1.621 401,617.54 .11 2540SMAD6 5.840% 10/17/2011 DO 03/18/99 399,757.82 .12 259,040.11 FBLRC GROUP 9G4-0353 .000 7.325 AAA 102.395 266,417.31 .07 3128DBMA2 3.500% 10/01/2004 DO 03/01/99 AAA 266,063.28 .08 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LN BE CONS ADS .000 6.402 AAA 110.094 7,997,625.00 2.44 3133MAUN7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/00/00 AAA 8,253,050.D0 2.38 114,786.25 FELMC GROUP 638-6064 .000 6.150 AAA 102.380 111,988.35 .03 31348SN83 6.3041 01/01/2028 DO 12/01/97 AAA 117,518.16 .03 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PASS i 6 OCSP07522202 2002/11/30 RON DATE t 12/06/02 DISTRICT: LONG-TERN CPEHATING RON TINS t 10.55.45 PAR VALUE YTN AT CONSENT NODDY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 4 TOTAL 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RTO ASSN ONES .000 4.907 AAA 107.000 11,521,271.50 3.56 31359NJE2 5.2501 06/15/2006 DO 06/22/01 AAA 12,144,500.00 3.49 3,145,I82.80 GNNA POOL 00569358 .000 6.240 AAA 104.169 3,219,512.00 .96 3620000R3 6.500% 04/15/2032 DO 04/01/02 AAA 3,2I6,921.20 .94 169,907.37 GNNA II POOL #0003109 .ODD 7.107 AAA 105.531 179,039.89 .05 36202D123 7.500% 07/20/2031 DO 07/01/01 AAA 179,304.16 .05 854,388.85 OHM II POOL #00031S2 .000 7.107 AAA I05.531 900,312.26 .26 36202DDD6 7.500% 10/20/2031 DO 10/01/01 AAA 901,641.12 .26 483,620.06 GNRA II POOL 40080395 .000 4.384 AAA 102.637 479,237.26 .14 36225CNN4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 AAA 496,373.12 .14 4,333,729.53 GNRA II POOL 4080408E .000 4.306 ARE, 102.596 4,289,715.09 1.31 36225CN29 6.500% 05/20/2030 DO 05/02/00 AAA 4,446,233.15 1.26 3,000,000.00 GTS NORTH INC DEB HER A .000 5.902 AA3 103.416 3,063,750.00 .91 362331AD9 6.000% 01/15/2004 DD O1/15/94 A+ 3,102,480.00 .89 4,000,000.DO MEN RAL EYES ACCEP ME 400615 .ODD 2.037 A2 98.968 3,999,440.00 1.17 37042WOO VAR RT 08/04/2003 DD O8/03/01 HER 3,958,720.00 1.14 4,000,000.00 NABISCO INC WE .000 6.092 A2 100.549 4,081,440.00 1.18 629527MO VAR RT 02/01/2033 DO 01/22/96 A 4,021,960.00 1.16 5,000,000.00 PHILIP NORRIS COS INC HIS .000 3.150 A2 104.900 5,263,000.00 1.55 718154CHS 3.500% 04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 A- 5,245,000.00 1.51 247,930.21 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.350 AAA 101.259 254,033.99 .07 74046RFW6 6.4304 03/08/2004 DD 06/21/99 251,059.75 .03 3,838,794.33 SBA GTD DEV PARTS 2001-20C 1 .000 5.054 AAA 108.300 3,839,794.33 1.22 03162CWO 6.340% 03/01/2021 AAA 4,157,414.26 1.20 2,841,235.03 SBA GTD PERTH CITE SBIC-PS O1 .000 6.131 AAA 100.300 2,841,235.03 .90 83164IDD4 6.640% 02/10/2011 DD 02/21/01 NR 3,077,057.54 .69 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTBRU 01-1 C .000 16.946 B3 40.310 1,600,000.00 .19 90931IBC2 6.031% 09/01/2008 DD 08/22/01 A- 644,960.00 .19 20,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.551 AAA 112.594 22,620,312.50 6.65 9128272J0 06.250% 02/IS/2001 DO 02/15/97 AAA 22,519,000.00 6.40 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7 O SM7522202 2002/11/30 RUN DATE 12/06/02 DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 1 10.55.45 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE NARRET VALUE 9 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 6,290,520.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .000 3.569 AAA 108.563 6,303,707.71 2.01 9128274Y5 3.8751 01/15/2009 DO O1/15/99 AAA 6,829,177.23 1.96 74,500,000.00 U B TREASURY NOTES .000 6.105 AAA 110.563 80r879,D62.50 24.34 9128276D9 06.7509 05/15/2005 DO 05/15/00 AAA 82,369,435.00 23.70 24,700FOOO.DO U 8 TREASURY NOTES .000 5.269 AAA 109.125 27,252,976.56 7.96 9128276N7 05.750% 21/15/2005 DO 11/15/00 AAA 26,953,875.00 7.75 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELSC 6 PRE. O1 BER A .000 5.445 A3 105.607 3,487,690.00 1.09 927004EN0 5.7501 03/31/2006 DO D3/27/01 BBB+ 3,696,245.00 1.06 26,274,280.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX RT 3.817 3.100 AAA 106.125 23,002,657.56 8.24 9120272N3 3.375% 01/15/2D07 DO O1115/97 AAA 27,883,579.65 8.02 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCBP CORP KIN 5.261 6.526 BAA1 100.219 1,439,920.00 .41 81240QGN6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,403,052.00 .40 3,950,000.00 GNAC HIS 5.752 1.524 A2 98.748 3,910,768.50 1.15 370425QVS VAR RT 08/18/2003 DO O9/17/98 BBB 3,900,546.00 1.12 2,000,000.00 RANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 5.881 1.493 Al 100.150 1,992,800.00 .59 066365DW4 MIS RT 05/11/20D3 DO 05/11/90 A 2,003,000.00 .58 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ASBN DEEP 5.967 6.472 AAA 110.094 16,154,410.00 5.04 31359NFB1 7.125% 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 17,064,570.00 4.91 3,000,ODO.DO BALTINORE GAB 6 ELEC CO 6.011 6.742 A2 100.125 3,038,250.00 .80 059165DN7 6.750% 12/15/2012 DO 12/20/00 888+ 3,003,750.00 .86 3,800,000.00 GENERAL HERB ACCEP 4TR 00562 6.303 1.563 A2 99.796 3,793,958.00 1.12 37042N8R0 VAR RT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 BBB 3,792,248.00 1.09 1.579,321.44 FRLNC NULTICLA88 NTG BER E3 A 6.316 4.617 AAA 99.557 1,581,004.07 .46 3133MR95 VAR AT O9/15/2032 DO 12/01/97 AAA 1,572,325.05 .45 1,215,512.42 GNNA GTD RENIC TR 2000-9 FS 6.320 1.873 AAA 100.435 2,215,512.42 .36 3837E4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,220,799.90 .35 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COB INC 6.330 6.637 A2 101.709 2,031,960.00 .60 073902MI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 2,034,180.00 .59 3,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.350 2.023 A3 99.359 3,000,000.00 .89 345397SR5 VAR RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/00 RUN 2,980,770.00 .86 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 O SF07522202 2002/11/3D RON DATE 12/06/02 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUM TIES 10.55.45 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 8-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 2,000,ODO.00 PORD MR CR CO GLOBAL NT8 6.351 1.520 A3 99.656 1,992,580.00 .58 345397RV7 MIS RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 BBB 1,993,120.00 .57 17,340.90 ENNA POOL 10500917 6.399 5.821 AAA 103.067 16,460.31 .00 36210SPA0 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 17,872.75 .01 56,403.57 GNMA POOL #0506636 6.389 5.821 AAA 103.067 53,539.32 .01 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 58,133.47 .02 676,922.01 OEM POOL #0503388 6.385 5.821 AAA 103.067 642,547.06 .20 36210W55 6.000% 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/59 AAA 697,683.21 .20 22,621.01 GMMA POOL #0499153 6.389 5.821 AAA 103.067 21,473.04 .00 362100035 6.000% 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 RAN 23,315.62 .01 5,962.54 GNMA POOL 10496284 6.390 5.021 AAA 103.067 5,659.76 .00 36210M351 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 6,145.41 .00 744,978.60 GNER POOL #0496461 6.390 5.921 AAA 103.067 707,147.64 .22 36210EON4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 767,827.09 .22 198,569.28 GNEA POOL 00492103 6.390 5.821 AAA 103.067 188,405.69 .06 36210PRY4 6.0008 01/15/2029 DO O1/02/99 AAA 104,659.4D .06 19,040.76 SENA POOL #0486720 6.390 5.816 AAA 103.156 17,124.63 .00 36210AVM6 6.000% 12/15/2020 DD 12/01/98 AAA 18,610.13 .01 35,875.97 GERA POOL #0497343 6.390 5.816 AAA 103.156 34,054.15 .01 36210W45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/99 ARE 37,008.22 .01 32,566.56 GNMA POOL #0469689 6.391 5.816 AAA 103.156 30,912.90 .00 36209EMB 6.000% 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/96 AAA 33,594.36 .01 41,296.50 GNNA POOL 40467279 6.391 5.816 AAA 103.156 39,199.42 .01 36209CCQ7 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/98 AAA 42,599.52 .01 68,561.06 GRMA POOL #0457814 6.391 5.816 AAA 103.156 65,079.44 .02 36208QBB3 6.0001 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/90 AAA 70,724.85 .02 663,773.03 SENA POOL 00467286 6.391 5.816 AAA 103.155 630,065.02 .20 36209CCK2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/O1/98 RAN 684,721.71 .20 759,475.00 GURA POOL 00465SSS 6.392 5.816 AAA 103.156 720,507.92 .23 36209AE48 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 09/U1/96 AAA 703,444.03 .23 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 9 MSF07522202 2002/11/30 RON DATE S 12/O6/02 DISTRICTS LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE 10.55.45 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD B-P PRICE MONET VALUE 6 TDTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 32,039.42 GWMA POOL #0403452 6.392 5.816 AAA 103.156 30,412.42 .00 36209NBV3 6.000E 09/15/2D2B DO 09/01/99 AAA 33,050.58 .01 704,966.56 GNRA POOL 90465546 6.392 5.816 AAA 103.156 745,104.97 .23 36209AET3 6.0001 08/15/2028 DD 00/01/99 AAA 809,740.10 .23 675,677.04 GERA POOL #0468339 6.392 5.916 AAA 103.156 641,365.33 .20 36209DEQ0 6.000E 00/15/2028 OD 08/01/98 AAA 697,001.41 .20 40,762.89 OEM POOL #0439057 6.393 5.816 AAA 103.156 30,711.89 .01 36207PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2026 DO 05/01/90 AAA 42,070.00 .01 33,951.00 GNNA POOL #0460330 6.393 5.816 AM 103.156 32,227.68 .01 36209DEF4 6.000E 05/15/2026 DO 05/01/98 AAA 35,023.32 .01 2,000,000.00 FRLNC NULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.288 AAA 103.366 2,000,008.00 .61 3133TDPV2 6.5001 09/25/2018 AAA 2,067,320.00 .59 2,827,604.03 PBLMC HULTICLASS CTF SER 1620E 6.499 5.729 AAA 104.722 2,671,464.09 .87 3133TI7A4 6.0006 11/15/2023 DD 11/02/93 AAA 2,961,123.49 .85 1,000,000.00 SAIAMON NB NI.OGB NTH 6.625 2.078 ml 100.109 1,000,000.00 .29 79548888E VAR RT 04/28/2003 DD 04/20/00 AA- 1,001,090.00 .29 310,216.21 FELHC GROUP #G5-0476 6.628 6.969 AAA 100.440 315,073.20 .09 3129DWSS 7.0001 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 311,581.16 .09 648,139.98 GNMA II POOL 9000090N 6.705 5.227 AAA 102.929 662,316.91 .19 36225CC20 7.3751 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAR 666,474.73 .19 2,000,000.00 KAREN 6 NCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 6.717 6.213 A2 106.624 1,992,280.00 .63 571749MG 6.6251 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 2,132,480.00 .61 3,000,000.00 PORD NEE CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.612 A3 101.328 2,995,080.00 .89 3453978J3 6.700E 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 BOB 3,039,840.00 .87 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE NONE INS INC NT 6.866 6.464 A3 105.971 2,498,400.00 .78 22237UMS 6.850% 06/15/2DO4 DD 06/24/99 A 2,649,275.00 .76 43B4O87.24 OEM II POOL #0000023 6.992 6.435 AAA 102.946 445,343.0E .13 36225CAE9 VAR RT 12/2D/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 450,993.29 .13 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ARM DBBS 7.113 5.823 AAA 113.701 2,030,133.00 .70 31359MYS 6.625% 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,309,401.00 .69 YLDANAL YIBLD ANALYSIS PAGE: 10 OC8F03522202 2002/11/30 ROR DATR 12/06/02 DISTRICT[ LONG-TERM CPBMTING RON TINE 10.55.45 PAR VALOR YTN AT CURRENT NODDY NARRIT TOTAL C08T/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SICDRITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICI NARRBT VALOR B TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DM 7.512 7.930 EAA3 102.092 2,151,250.00 .60 542631CT0 8.200% 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 A- 2,OS1,840.00 .59 799,068.01 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORD FBA 495-3 7.564 7.296 AAA 101.835 787,394.12 .24 398106AR4 3.4301 06/01/2003 DD 02/29/00 AAA 813,733.39 .23 1,000,000.00 PORD M R CR CO NT 7.582 6.369 A3 99.315 965,170.00 .29 345391GV9 6.750% 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93 BBB 997,150.00 .29 955,517.27 NMP/BONTOON PAIO6 B000-11150 2.604 3.138 AAA 104.486 934,765.13 .29 302998=3 7.5001 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 990,384.69 .29 3,DOO.000.00 PACIPICORP SECD NTN #TR 00115 7.709 6.784 A3 107.609 2,950,530.00 .95 695122BUS 3.300E 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,228,270.00 .93 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORD NR NT 7.967 3.135 Al 110.371 2,594,032.00 .52 020002AL5 7.8751 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 Ai 1,765,936.00 .51 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TVTAL FIXED INCOME SECORITIRS 1.052 5.352 328,3B1,576.85 100.00 330,305,821.62 97.32 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TVTAI. 1.051 5.346 337,659,074.54 100.00 347,584,119.31 1DO.00 Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: I PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS PURCHASES CASH @ CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63,026.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2002 -63,026.10 996085247 01-Nov-2002 63,026.10 g 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63,026.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2002 -63,026.10 996095247 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 01-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 799,419.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2002 -789,419.60 996085247 01-Nov-2002 789,419.60 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 789,419.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Nov-2002 -789,419.60 996085247 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 01-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01-Nov-2002 -500,000.00 9939BG577 01.790%11/042002 DD 11/011 01-Nov-2002 500,000.00 g LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01-Nov-2002 -500,000.00 993980577 01.790%1 V042002 DO 11101/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 01-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15::11:36 Ececultve Wmkbeech Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 522,313.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-2002 -522,313.67 996085247 04-Nov-2002 522,313.67 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 522,313.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-2002 -522,313.67 9%085247 04-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 04-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Nov-2002 -997,000.00 313396AR4 MAT01/162003 05-Nov-2002 997,000.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 04-Nov-2002 -997,000.00 313396AR4 MAT01/162003 05-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 05-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,952.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Nov-2002 -2,952.53 996085247 05-Nov-2002 2,952.53 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,952.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Nov-2002 -2,952.53 996085247 05-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 05-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,678.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Nov-2002 -6,678.84 996085247 05-Nov-2002 6,678.84 B 0.00 10-Dec-1001 15:11:36 Esecutme wkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,678.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Nov-2002 -6,678.84 996085247 05-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 05-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 128,070.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Nov-2002 -128,070.77 9%085247 08-Nov-2002 128,070.77 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 129,070.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Nov-2002 -128,070.77 996085247 08-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 08-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,360.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Nov-2002 -33,360.96 996085247 08-Nov-2002 33,360.96 g 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,360.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Nov-2002 -33,360.96 996085247 08-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 08-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,694,816.92 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 08-Nov-2002 -3,694,816.92 9%087094 08-Nov-2002 3,694,916.92 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 7,695.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Nov-2002 -7,695.42 996085247 12-Nov-2002 7,695.42 g 0.00 10-Deo2002 15.11:36 Erecuaw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 7,695.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I2-Nov-2002 -7,695.42 996095247 12-Nov2002 0A0 FC 12-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,694,816.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I2-Nov-2002 -3,694,816.92 996095247 12-Nov-2002 3,694,816.92 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,694,816.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Nov-2002 -3,694,816.92 9196085247 12-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 12-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,417.22 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 12-Nov-2002 -9,417.22 996087094 12-Nov-2002 9,417.22 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 128,923.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Nov-2002 -128,923.11 996085247 13-Nov-2002 128,923.11 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 128,923.11 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Nov-2002 -128,923.11 996085247 13-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 13-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,673.14 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I4-Nov-2002 -55,673.14 996085247 14-Nov-2002 55,673.14 B 0.00 1044e 2002 15:11:36 ErecutNe Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,673.14 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Nov-2002 -55,673.14 996085247 14-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 14-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 14-Nov-2002 -1,4%,022.50 5007MINU3 01/29/2003 15-No,2002 1,496,022.50 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 14-Nov-2002 -1,496,022.50 5007MINU3 0128/2003 15-Nov-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 95,102.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2002 -95,102.50 996085247 1S-Nov-2002 95,102.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 95,102.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2002 -95,102.50 9%085247 15-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,009,657.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2002 4,009,657.40 996085247 15-Nov-2002 4,009,657.40 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,009,657.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Nov-2002 4,009,657.40 996085247 15-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trast-Sample Report PAGE.' 6 PORTFOLIO DETAD. 0CSG0001000o 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5.90 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Nov-2002 -5.80 996085247 18-Nov-2002 5.80 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5.80 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Nov-2002 -5.80 996085247 18-Nov-2002 0.00 FC I8-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,445.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT IS-Nov-2002 42,445.64 996085247 IS-Nov-2002 42,445.64 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,445.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I S-Nov-2002 4Z445.64 996085247 18-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 18-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,205.68 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 18-Nov-2002 -23,205.68 996087094 18-Nov-2002 23,205.68 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 131,135.37 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Nov-2002 -131,135.37 996085247 19-Nov-2002 131.135.37 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 131,135.37 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Nov-2002 -131,133.37 996085247 19-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 19-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Deo-2002 15:11:36 Ewmtive Wn kbeMh Q McOoR Trust- Sample Report PAGE, ,7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARFSMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,465,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 19-Nov-2002 -2,460,891.67 313384AH2 MAT01/082003 21-Nov-2002 2,460,891.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,465,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 19-Nov-2002 -2,460,891.67 313384AH2 MAT01/082003 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Nov-2002 498,923.61 313588AX3 MAT01222003 21-Nov-2002 498,923.61 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PRNCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU I9-Nov-2002 -498,923.61 313588AX3 MAT0I222003 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,680,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Nov-2002 -1,675,975.00 313588BE4 MAT01292003 21-Nov-2002 1,675,975.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,680,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 19-Nov-2002 -1,675,975.00 313588BE4 MAT01292003 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,916,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 19-Nov-2002 -1,913,205.83 313396AB9 MAT 01/0120D3 21-Nov-2002 1,913,205.93 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 10-D,o-2002 IS:11:36 Fs mtta Workbench Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCED-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,916,000,00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 19-Nov-2002 -1,913,205.83 313396AB9 MAT01/022003 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 401,262.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Nov-2002 A01,262.70 996085247 20-Nov-2002 401,262.70 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 401,262.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Nov-2002 401,262.70 996085247 20-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,902,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Nov-2002 -1,890,529.98 313588FG5 MAT 05/07/2003 21-Nov-2002 1,890,529.89 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,902,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Nav-2002 -1,890,529.89 313588FG5 MAT 05/072003 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO MC,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 550,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Nov-2002 -547,656.39 313588DF9 MAT 03/192003 21-Nov-2002 547,656.39 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 550,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Nov-2002 -547,656.39 313588DF9 MAT 03/192003 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 Ekemm Wnrkbemh " Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NO V-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLOATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 20-Nov-2002 -1,798,645.50 97665SMCI 12/122002 21-Nov-2002 1,798,645.50 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 20-Nov-2002 -1,798,645.50 97665SMCI 12/122002 21-Nov-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 455.277.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2002 455,277.04 9%085247 21-Nov-2002 455,277.04 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 455,277.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Nov-2002 -455,277.04 996085247 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,100,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 22-Nov-2002 -9,100,000.00 99398ZI38 01.220%1]252002 DD 11/22/ 22-Nov-2002 9,100,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,100,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 22-Nov-2002 -9,100,000.00 99398ZI38 01.220%11252002DD 11/22/ 22-Nov-2001 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PiMCO 9,118,116.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Nov-2002 -9,118,116.29 996085247 25-Nov-2002 9,118,116.29 B 0.00 10-Dec-1002 15:11:36 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 0CS000010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,118,116.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Nov-2002 -9,118,116.29 996085247 25-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 25-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 26-Nov-2002 -9,061,476.67 313588DN2 MAT 03262003 26-Nov-2002 9,061,476.67 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PiMCO 9,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 26-Nov-2002 -9,061,476.67 313588DN2 MAT 03262003 26-Nov-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 26-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 36.48 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 29-Nov-2002 -36.48 996087094 29-Nov-2002 36.48 B 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMFFTOPURFNMASFMTG 07-Oa-2002 -5,125,000.00 01F0606B6 6.000%1 110 1203 2 DO 11/011 14-Nov-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 08-Oct-2002 -3,097,187.50 01F0524B5 5.500%11/012017 DO I UOV 19-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Oct-2002 -2,076,875.00 OIN0626B3 &500%11/152032 DO I I/01/ 20-Nov-2002 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 Executive Wbrkbench " Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE, 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GABWLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-W-2002 -8,305,000.00 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/152032 DO 11/01/ 20-Nov-2002 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 16-0M-2002 6,210,000.00 0IF0604B8 6.000%I IMI2017 DO I I/01/ 19-Nov-2002 -6,210,000.00 BC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 16-Oct-2002 6,211,975.00 0IF0604B8 6.000%11/012017 DD 11/01/ 19-Nov-2002 -6,211,875.00 BC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 16.Oct-2002 3,104,062.50 0IF0604B8 6.000%1 V012017 DD I 1101/ 19-Nov-2002 -3,104,062.50 BC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 16.Oct-2002 -6,211,875.00 0IF0604B8 6.000%11/012017 DD I I/01/ 19-NOV-2002 6,211,975.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 16.0ct-2002 -6,211,975.00 0IF0604B8 6.000%11/012017 DD I I/0V 19-Nov-2002 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NAIL TR&SVGS CT 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTO 16-0c62002 -3,104,062.50 0IF0604B8 6.000%I IPo12017 DO 11/01/ 19-Nov-2002 3,104,062.50 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 EweutNe Wwkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 16-Oct-2002 -3,104,062.50 0IF0604BR 6.0001%11/01/2017 DD 11/01/ 19-Nov-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 16-OM-2002 -6,210,000.00 0IF0604B8 6.000%11/01/2017 DD 11/011 19-Nov-2002 6,210,000.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 16-Oct-2002 -6,210,000.00 01F0604B8 6.000%11/01/2017 DD II/01/ 19-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS MTN 31-Oct-2002 -157,761.00 31331NW59 6.550%08/192003 DO 08/19/9 01-Nav-2002 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 01-No,2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BUS 31-Oct-2002 -104,578.29 3133M55B2 5.925%08/142003 DD 08/14/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 01-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 01-Nov-2002 -1,019,910.00 3133MG511 4.500%07/0712003 DD 07/06/0 04-Nov-2002 1,019,910.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 01-Nov-2002 -14,625.00 3133MG511 4.500°/.07/072003 DD 07/06/0 04-Nov-2002 0.00 ID 0.00 /0-Dec-2002 15:11:36 Executive Workbench " Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCsc00010000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 01-Nov-2002 -1,034,535.00 3133MG5J1 4.500%07/072003 DD 0710610 D4-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 04-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 01-Nov-2002 -101,807.00 313400TH6 6.220%03242003 DO 0324/9 04-Nov-2002 101,807.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER O.OD LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 01-Nov-2002 -691.11 31340MM6 6.220Yo03242003 DO 0324/9 04-Nov-2002 0.00 TB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 01-Nov-2002 -102,498.11 313400TH6 6.220%03242003 DO 0324/9 04-Now2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 04-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 TOSCO CORP GTD IST MTG BD 01-Nov-2002 -154,944.00 991490AFI 8.250%05/152003 DD 051151 06-Nov-2002 154,944.00 B ASH AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 TOSCO CORP GTD 1ST MTG BD 01-Nov-2002 -5,878.13 891490AFI 8.250%05/152003 DO 051151 06-Nov-2002 0.00 16 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 TOSCO CORP GTD 1ST MTG BD 01-Nov-2002 -160,822.13 891490AFI 8.250%05/152003 DO 051151 06-Nov-2002 0.00 FC ABN AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA 06-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 Emcwlve Wmkbnwh Q Mellon Trast-Sample Report PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSCa00010000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 01-Nov-2002 -101,262.00 3133M3EZ4 6.000%02/182003 DO 02/10 04-Nov-2002 101,262.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 01-Nov-2002 -1.266.67 3133M3E24 6.000%02/18/2003 DD 02/10 04-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN INKS CONS BD 01-Now2002 -102,528.67 3133M3E24 6.000%02/182003 DO 02/19/9 04-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 04-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEB 07-Nov-2002 -1.018,200.00 3134A4FF6 4.500%06/152003 DO 0611510 08-Nov-2002 1,018,200.00 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTO CORP DEB 07-Nov-2002 -17,875.00 3134A4FF6 4.500%06/152003 DO 0611510 08-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEB 07-Nov-2002 -1,036,075.00 3134A4FF6 4.500%06/152003 DO 06/1510 08-Nov-2002 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 09-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 07-Nov-2002 -1,019,970.00 3133MG511 4.500%07/072003 DO 07/06/0 08.Nov-2002 1,019,970.00 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 0.00 10-Deo-2002 15:11:36 Enmebw Wb kbswh ^ Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 07-Nov-2002 -15,125.00 3133MG531 4.500%07/07/2003 DO 07/06/0 08-14ov-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO I,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 07-Nov-2002 -1,035,095.00 3133MG531 4,500%07/0712003 DO 07/06/0 08-Nov-2002 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 08-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 07-Nov-2002 -8,332,500.00 OIN0626CI 6,500%12/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 19-Dee-2002 9,332,500.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Nov-2002 -5,143,750.00 0IF0606C4 6.000%12/01/2032 DO 12/01/ 12-Dec-2002 5,143,750.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Nov-2002 -6,243,750.00 01F0604C6 6.000%12/01/2017 DD 12/01/ 17-Dec-2002 6,243,750.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Nov-2002 -3,121,875.00 0IF0604C6 6.000%12/01/2017 DO 12/01/ 17-De 2002 3,121,875.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 14-Nov-2002 -6,240,000.00 0IF0604C6 6.000%12/01/2017 DD 12/01/ 17-Dec-2002 6,240,000.00 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 Execulive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 18-Nov-2002 -2,081,875.00 OIN0626C1 6.500%12/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 19-Dec-2002 2,081,875.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,850.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2002 -44,850.00 9128272103 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 011151 15-Jul-2002 44,850.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,850.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-1ul-2002 -44,850.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DD 01/151 15-Jul-2002 0.00 PC 29-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,773.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2002 -10,773.00 9128274YS 3.875%01/15/2009 DO 011151 15-Jul-2002 10,773.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,773.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-1ul-2002 -10,773.00 9128274Y5 3.875%01/15/2009 DO 01/15/ 15-1ul-2002 0.00 FC 29-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,067.57 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Nov-2002 -14,067.57 3133T17A4 6.000^/e 11/152023 DD 1110119 01-Nov-2002 14,067.57 PU 0.00 10-15ea1002 15:11:36 ExeeulNe Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Re ort PACE. 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,067.57 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Nov-2002 .14,067.57 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DD 1110119 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 19-Nov-2002 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 31-Oc1-2002 999,818.89 313397N31 MAT 11/052002 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC SMITH BARNEY INC.NEW YORK 01-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01-Nov-2002 500,000.00 99398F256 01.870%/1/012002 DO 10/31/ 01-Nov-2002 -500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01-Nov-2002 25.97 9939SF256 01.870%11/012002 DD 101311 01-Nov-2002 0.00 15 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01-Nov-2002 500,025.97 99398F256 01.970%11/012002 DO 10/31/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 01-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 01-Nov-2002 996,930.55 313385Q41 MAT 11222002 04-Nov-2002 -996,930.55 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 10-Dec-1001 15:11:36 Evemllve Wwkbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCS000010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 01-Nov-2002 2,294.45 313385Q41 MAT 11/22/2002 04-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 01-Nov-2002 999,225.00 313385Q41 MAT 11222002 04-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 04-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -239,666.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-2002 239.666.57 996085247 04-Nov-2002 -239,666.57 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MC0 -239,666.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-2002 239,666.37 996095247 04-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 04-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 04-Nov-2002 500,000.00 993980577 01.790%11IM002 DD 1 I101/ 04-Nov-2002 -500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 04-Nov-2002 74.58 993990377 01.790%I I/04/2002 DD I MV 04-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 04-Nov-2002 500,074.58 993980577 01.790%11/042002 DD I1/01/ 04-Nov-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 04-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 &ecwlve Wbrkbencb " Qji Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE- 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRBTION/ SE77L DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -160,822.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Nov-2002 160,922.13 996085247 06-Nov-2002 -160,822.13 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P[MCO -160,822.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 06-Nov-2002 160,822.13 996085247 06-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 06-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC 07-Nov-2002 1,196,316.67 3133"1 MAT 1122/2002 08-Nov-2002 -1,196,316.67 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-Nov-2002 3,104.66 313385Q4] MAT I1222002 08-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC 07-Nov-2002 1,199,421.33 313385Q41 MAT 11222002 08-Nov-2002 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 08-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMOO -1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 07-Nov-2002 999,819.44 63743DLDI 11/132002 O&Nov-2002 -997,600.00 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 2,219.44 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 07-Nov-2002 999,819.44 63743DLDI 11/132002 08-Nov-2002 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 08-Nov-2002 0.00 10.De .2002 15:11::36 F"mttve Wmkbexh Q Mellou Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE- 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 08-Nov-2002 796,562.22 313384ASS MAT01/17/2003 08-Nov-2002 -796,562.22 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 08-Nov-2002 1,524.45 313384ASB MAT01/17/2003 08-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 08-Nov-2002 798,086.67 313384AS8 MAT 01/172003 09-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 08-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 08-Nov-2002 2,888,359.72 313589S79 MAT 12/112002 08-Nov-2002 -2,988,359.72 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2.900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 08-Nov-2002 8,370.33 313589S79 MAT 121112002 08-Nov-2002 0.00 1S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 08-Nov-2002 2,996,730.23 313589S79 MAT 12/112002 08-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 12-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,694,816.92 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 12-Nov-2002 3,694,816.92 996087094 12-Nov-2002 -3,694,816.92 S 0.00 10-Dvo-2002 15:11:36 F.,wi.Wwkbomh' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Rel2ort PAGE..- 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,417.22 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 13-Nov-2002 9,417.22 996087094 13-Nov-2002 -9,417.22 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,205.68 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 19-Nov-2002 23,205.68 996087094 19-Nov-2002 -23,205.68 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 20-Nov-2002 1,799,937.50 38142ULNO 1122/2002 21-Nov-2002 -1,793,214.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 6,723.50 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 20-Nov-2002 1,799,937.50 38142ULNO 11/222002 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Nov-2002 2,489,437.50 313589U43 MAT 1224/2002 21-Nov-2002 -2,489,437.50 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 2NNov-2002 7,743.75 3135891143 MAT 1224/2002 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2.500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 20-Nov-2002 2,497,181.25 313589U43 MAT 12/242002 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 21-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-1001 15:11:36 Eiecullve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,034,327.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Nov-2002 1,034,327.50 996095247 22-Nov-2002 -1,034,327.50 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,034,327.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Nov-2002 1,034,327.50 9%085247 22-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 22-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,100,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Nov-2002 9,100,000.00 996085247 22-Nov-2002 -9,100,000.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,100,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Nov-2002 9,100,000.00 996085247 22-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 22-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,100,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 25-Nov-2002 9,100,000.00 99398ZI38 01.220°h 1 12 5120 0 2 DO 11221 25-Nov-2002 -9,100,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,100,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 25-Nov-2002 925.17 99398ZI38 01.220%11252002 DO 11221 25-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,100,000.00 LEHMANCAT2REPO 25-Nov-2002 9,100,925.17 99398ZI38 01.220%11252002 DO 1122/ 25-Nov-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 25-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dea2001 15:11:36 Ece"flw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsGowl0000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,061,476.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 26-Nov-2002 9,061,476.67 996085217 26-Nov-2002 -9,061,476.67 S ODD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,061,476.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Nov-2002 9,061,476.67 996085247 26-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 26-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -72.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Nov-2002 72.96 996085247 29-Nov-2002 -72.96 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -72.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Nov-2002 72.96 996085247 29-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 29-Nov-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000,00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 29-Oc1-20D2 3,089,062.50 0IF0524B5 5.500%11/01/2017 DD 111011 19-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA SF MTG 07-Nov-2002 8,346,875.00 01N0626B3 6.500%1 1/1512 03 2 DD I I/01/ 20-Nov-2002 -8,305,277.78 S WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 41,597.22 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF WO 07-Nov-2002 8,346,875.00 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/15/2032 DD I I/01/ 20-Nov-2002 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 20-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dee-2002 15:11:36 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 12-Nov-2002 5,162,109.38 01F0606B6 6.000%11/012032 DO 11/01/ 14-Nov-2002 -5,125,000.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 37,109.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Nov-2002 5,162,109.38 0IF0606B6 6.000%11/01/2032 DD 11101/ 14-Nov-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 13-NovQ002 6,254,531.25 0IF0604B8 6.000%11/012017DD 11/011 19-Nov-2002 -6,210,375.00 S BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 44,156.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Nov-2002 6,254,531.25 01F0604B8 6.000%1 1/012 0 1 7 OD I 1/011 19-Nov-2002 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 13-Nov-2002 3,127,148.44 0IF0604BS 6.000%11/01/2017 DO 11/011 19-Nov-2002 3,105,187.50 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 21,960.94 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 13-N0v-2002 3,127,148.44 0IF0604BS 6.000%11/01/2017 DD 11101/ 19-Nov-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 14-Nav-2002 6,250,312.50 0IF0604B8 6.000%11/01/2017 DO 111011 19-Nov-2002 -6,210.375.00 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 39,937.50 10-Dco-2001 15:11:36 Execulm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTO 14-Nov-2002 6,250,312.50 0IF0604BS 6.000%1 MI2017 DO 111011 19-Nov-2002 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -505,OOD.OD BANC ONE MILW NA SUB HIS Ill-Nov-2002 515,145.45 064216AA2 6.625%04//52003 DO 04/1519 21-Nov-2002 -519,058.30 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK -3,912.85 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -505,000.00 BANC ONE MILW NA SUB NTS I8-Nov-2002 3,345.63 064216AA2 6.625%04/152003 DO 04/1519 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IS oho LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -505,000.00 BANC ONE MILW NA SUB NTS 18-Nov-2002 Slt,191.08 064216AA2 6.625%04/152003 DD 04/15/9 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 PHILADELPHIA ELEC CO IST MTG 18-Nov-2002 1,020,420.00 717537DC5 6.500%05/012OD3 DO 05/0119 21-Nov-2002 -1,027,680.00 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK -7,260.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO -I,OOQ000.00 PHILADELPHIA ELEC CO IST MTG 18-Nov-2002 3,611.11 717537DC5 6.500%05/012003 DD 05/0119 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -LOD0,000.00 PHILADELPHIA ELEC CO 1ST MTG I8-Nov-2002 1,024,031.11 717537DC5 6.500%05/012003 DD 0510119 21-Nov-2002 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 21-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-1002 15:11:36 Fx tiw Workbexb Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL oCSG000l0000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATF/ COSTI TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP SR NTS 18-Nov-2002 1,007,650.00 441812EU4 7.625%01/152003 DD 01/14/9 21-Nov-2002 -1,028,630.00 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY -20,980.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP SR NTS I8-Nov-2002 26,637.50 441812EU4 7.625%01/15/2003 DD 01/14/9 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP SR NTS 18-Nov-2002 1,034,337.50 441812EU4 7.625%01/15/2003 DO 01/14/9 21-Nov-2002 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 18-Nov-2002 609,750.00 073902B16 6.200%03/3 02 0 0 3 DO 0313ON 21-Nov-2002 -615,994.00 S WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW -6,234.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB IS-Nov-2002 5,270.00 073902B16 6.200%03/302003 DD 03130/9 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB I8-Nov-2002 615,020.00 073902BJ6 6.200%03/30/2003 DO 03/30/9 21-Nov-2002 0.00 PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 18-Nov-2002 611,886.00 073902AHI 6.750%04/15/2003 21-Nov-2002 -620.292.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -8,406.00 10-Dec-1002 15.11:36 Emcuftw W6,kbench ' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 18-Nav-2002 4,050.00 073902AIII 6.750%04/15/2003 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 18-Nov-2002 615,936.00 073902AHI 6.750%04/152003 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Nov-2002 0A0 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 PUBLIC SVC CO OF CO I8-Nov-2002 1,008,200.00 744448B79 6.0001%04/152003 DD 042019 21-Nov-2002 -1,022,640.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY -14,440.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 PUBLIC SVC CO OF CO IB-Nav-2002 6,000.00 744448B19 6.000%04/152003 DO 04/20/9 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 PUBLIC SVC CO OF CO 18-Nov-2002 1,014,200.00 744448BJ9 6.000%04/152003 DD 0420/9 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,050,000.00 TOSCO CORP GTD I ST MTG BD 18-Nov-2002 1,082,256.00 891490AFI 8.250%05/152003 DD 0511 S/ 21-Nov-2002 -1,087.137.00 S MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 4,881.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,050,000.00 TOSCO CORP GTD I ST MTG BD 18-Nov-2002 1,443.75 891490AF1 8.250%0 511 5 20 0 3 DD 05/15/ 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 10-Dec-1002 15::11:36 &ecufive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE' 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000I0000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,050,000.00 TOSCO CORP GTD 1ST MTG BD I8-Nov-2002 1,083,699.75 891490AFI 8.250%05/152003 DO 051151 21-Nov-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 18-Nov-2002 2,085,468.75 01140626B3 6.500%1 1/1 520 3 2 DD 11/011 20-Nov-2002 -2,076,597.22 S CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 8,871.53 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG I8-Nov-2002 2,085,468.75 OIN0626B3 6.500%11/152032 DO U/01/ 20-Nov-2002 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 20-Nov-2002 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32,638.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SEE E3 01-Oct-2002 -32,638.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DO 12/01/ 01.Od-2002 32.613.27 PDC 34.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,213.40 FHLMC GROUP 87&6064 01-Oct-2002 5,213.40 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 121011 01-Od-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -699.10 WMPMUNFOON PAGGE 8000-II150 01-Od-2002 698.10 302998GE3 7.500%12/0/2030 DO 1021/9 01-Oct-2002 0.00 FC 05-Nov-2002 0.00 15 11 36 &eemAe Wm4bewh' Q Mellon Tnmt-Sam le Re ort PAGE- 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 7CSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 3CSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GADS/IASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,644.56 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG,SER E3 01-Ott-2002 32,644.56 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DO 12/01/ 01-Oc62002 -32,679.34 PD -34.78 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,644.56 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Od-2002 32,644.56 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DD 12/01/ 01-W-2002 0.00 FC I5-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -134,385-% GNMA POOL#0569358 01-Nov-2002 134,395.96 362000QK3 6.500%04/152032 DD 041011 01-Nov-2002 -137,535.63 PD -3,149.67 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -134,395.96 GNMA POOL#0569358 01-Nov-2002 134,385.96 362000QK3 6.500%04/152032 DO 04101/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,546.44 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Nov-2002 1,546.44 36209EXRB 6.000%ll/l52028DD 11/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -1,467.91 PD 78.53 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,546.44 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Nov-2002 1,546.44 36209EXR8 6.000%llA52028DDll/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -60,647.31 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Nov-2002 60,647.31 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152029 DO 08/01/ 01-Nov-2002 .57,567.56 PD 3,079.75 Ex ufive Workbeech Q Mellon Troat-Sample Report PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -60,647.31 GNMA POOL80468339 01-Nov-2002 60,647.31 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC I3-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .57.92 GNMA POOLM0468330 01•Nov-2002 57.92 36209DHF4 6.000%0 511 52 02 8 DD 05/01t 01-Nov-2002 -54.98 PD 2.94 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57.92 GNMA POOLW0468330 01-Nov-2002 57.92 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028DD05/0I/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,073.83 GNMA POOL80467286 01-Nov-2002 15,073.93 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -14,308.36 PD 765.47 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,073.83 GNMA POOL#0467286 01-Nov-2002 15,073.83 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .63.51 GNMA POOL80467279 01-Nov-2002 63.51 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/011 01-Nov-2002 -60.28. PD 3.23 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .63.51 GNMA POOL80467279 01-Nov-2002 63.51 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/01/ 01-Nav-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 10-nec-2001 15:11:36 Ezeewive Wwkbekh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE. ' 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 1Csc000/omo 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 3CSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,169.68 GNMA POOLA0457814 01-Nov-2002 3,169.68 36208QSB3 6.000°/10/152028 DO 10101/ 01-Nov-2002 -3,009.72 PD 160.96 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,169.69 GNMA POOLN0457814 01-Nov-2002 3,169.69 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .31.26 GNMA POOLN0486720 01-Nov-2002 31.26 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -29.67 PD 1.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .31.26 GNMA POOLA0486720 01-Nov-2002 31.26 36210AVM6 6.0001A 12/152028 DO 121011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46.98 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Nov-2002 46.98 36209WBV3 6.000%09/192028 DO 09/01/ 01-Nov-2002 .44.59 PD 2.39 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 46.98 GNMA POOL 00483452 01-Nov-2002 46.98 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -881.11 GNMA POOLN0506636 01-Nov-2002 881.II 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -836,37 PD 44.74 ••• +��+ n.n.a Exmdw Wwkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SUARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -881.11 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Nov-2002 891.11 36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029 DO 04101/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7.39 GNMA POOL#0496284 01-Nov-2002 7.39 36210M151 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -7.01 PD 0.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7.39 GNMA POOL#0496284 01-Nov-2002 7.39 36210MI51 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,837.96 GNMA POOL#04%461 01-Nov-2002 12,937.86 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/0l/ 01-Nov-2002 42,185.94 PD 651.92 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,837.86 GNMA POOL#0496461 01-Nov-2002 12,837.86 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/0l/ 01-Nov-2002 0,00 PC 15-No,2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,515.31 GNMA POOL 90497343 01-Nov-2002 2,515.31 36210NP45 6.000%12/152029 DD 12/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -2,387.59 PD 127.73 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,515.31 GNMA POOLN0497343 01-Nov-2002 2,515.31 36210NP45 6.000%12/152028 DD 121011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 m-ne,-W2 15:11:36 E`eeulm WwAbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35.33 GNMA POOL 00499153 01-Nov-2002 35.33 3621000W 6.000%02/15/2029 DD 021011 01-Nov-2002 -33.54 PD 1.79 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35.33 GNMA POOL80499153 01-Nov-2002 35.33 3621000E5 6.000%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,274.59 ONMA POOL00500917 01-Nov-2002 1,274.59 36210SPA0 6.000%04/l52029DD04/0l/ 01-Nov-2002 -1.209.96 PD 64.73 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,274.59 GNMA POOL80500917 01-Nov-2002 1,274.59 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -253,650.71 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-Nov-2002 253,650.71 3128DDQ55 7.000%0210IWO DD 02/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -257,622.14 PD -3,971.43 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -253,650.71 FHLMC GROUP 805-0476 01-Nov-2002 253,650.71 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02101/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,531.32 FHLMC GROUP#04.0353 01-Nov-2002 37,531.32 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 03/011 01-Nov-2002 -38,481.33 PD -950.01 10-Dec-2002 I S:11:36 Executive Wo�kbecch Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,531.32 FHLMC GROUP AG4.0353 01-Nov-2002 37,531.32 3128DBMA2 7.50091.10/012004 DO 03/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53.00 GNMA POOL80438057 01-Nov-2002 53.00 36207PT 49 6.000%0 5/1 5 20 2 8 DO 05/011 01-Nov-2002 .30.31 PD 2.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53.00 GNMA POOL80438057 01-Nov-2002 53.00 36207PTN9 6.060%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -96.000.61 GNMA 11 POOL#0003152 01-Nov-2002 96,000.61 36202DQD6 7.500%10/202031 DO 10/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -9%623.14 PD 4,622.53 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -86,000.61 GNMA 11 POOL#0003152 01-Nov-2002 86,000.61 36202DQD6 7.500%10202031 DD 10101/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -15,188.21 GNMA II POOL#0003109 01-Nov-2002 15,189.21 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DO 07/011 01-Nov-2002 .16,004.58 PD -816.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,188.21 GNMA II POOL#0003109 01-Nov-2002 13.189.21 36202DN23 7.500%0720/2031 DD07/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2002 0.00 10.Dec-2002 15:11:36 Ereeolfve Wmkbowh - Qfl Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,601.82 GNMA II POOL#0090395 01-Nov-2002 23,601.82 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04202030DD041O1/ 01-Nov-2002 -23,387.93 PD 213.89 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,601.82 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Nov-2002 23,601.82 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 041011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,962.35 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 01-Nov-2002 34,962.35 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DD 061011 01-Nov-2002 -35,727.15 PD -764.80 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,962.35 GNMA II POOL A080088M 01-Nov-2002 34,962.35 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -61,331.16 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 01-Nov-2002 61,331.16 831641DD4 6.640%02/102011 DD02J2l/ 01-Nov-2002 -61,331.16 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -61,331.16 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 01-Nov-2002 61,331.16 831641DD4 6.640%02/102011 DO 02/21/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 13-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,082.09 GNMA POOL90491103 01-Nov-2002 7,092.09 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -6,722.45 PD 359.64 10-Ne -2002 15.11:36 Fwm,O ,Wo kbmcb Q Mellon Trust-Ssm le Re orl PAGE 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,082.09 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Nov-2002 7,082.09 36210FRY4 6.000%011152029DDDI/0l/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,261.00 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Nov-2002 5,261.00 36210VF55 6.0009/.03/152029DD03/01/ 01-Nov-2OD2 4,993.84 PD 267.16 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .5,261.00 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Nov-2002 5,261.00 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DO 03/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,683.45 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Nov-2002 18,683.45 36209AET3 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 08/0V 01-Nov-2002 -17,734.68 PD 948.77 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO .18,683.45 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Nov-2002 19,683.45 36209AET3 6.000%03/15/2028 DO 09/011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,267.94 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Nov-2002 1,267.94 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028 DD 09/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -1,203.35 PD 64.39 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,267.94 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Nov-2002 1,267.94 36209AF48 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-Nov-2002 0.00 10.Dec-1001 15:11:36 Ewmfive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,916.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Nov-2002 43,916.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/152032 DD 12/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -43,963.29 PD 46.79 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,963.70 FHLMC GROUP%78-6064 01-Nov-2002 2,963.70 31348SWZ3 6.384%0 1/0 1202 8 DO 12/01/ 01-Nov-2002 -2,891.46 PD 72.24 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,751.93 GNMA II POOL 0080023 01-Nov2002 15.751.93 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 12101/9 01-Nov-2002 -16,012.82 PD -260.99 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,751.93 GNMA 11 POOL 40080023 01-Nov-2002 15,751.93 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 12101/9 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -143,995.91 GNMA II POOL#080408X 01-Nov-2002 143,995.91 36225CN29 6.500%0520/2030 DD 05/011 01-Nov-2002 -142,533,45 PD 1,462.46 LONG TERM OPFR-PIMCO -143,995.91 GNMA II POOL s080408X 01-Nov-2002 143,995.91 36225CN29 6.500%05202030 DD 051011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 PC 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,401.55 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Nov2002 1,401.55 398100AE4 7.430%06/012003 DD 022910 01-Nov-2002 -1,381.07 PD 20.48 10-Dec-2002 15::11:36 Eeemlive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,401.55 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01-Nov-2002 1,401.55 39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 0229/0 01-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 25-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -702.97 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000.11150 01-Nov-2002 702.97 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DO 1021/9 01-14ov-2002 -687.70 PD 15.27 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31,861.70 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 09-Nov-2002 31,861.70 74046RFW6 6.4309A03/092004 DD 062119 08-Nov-2002 -32,747.85 PD -896.15 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31,861.70 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-Nov-2002 31,861.70 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082D04 DO 0621/9 08-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 08-Nov-2002 0-00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -54,347 68 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Nov-2002 54,342.68 25475MAD6 5.840v/e 10/172011 DD 03/181 15-Nov-2002 -55,480.48 PD .1,137.80 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,342.68 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Nov-2002 54,342.68 25475MAD6 5.840%10/172011 DO 031181 15-Nov-2002 0.00 FC 15-14ov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,033.95 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Nov-2002 40,033.95 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Now2002 40,033.95 PD 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 Executive Workbench` Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40,033.95 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Nov-2002 40,033.95 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Nov-2002 0.00 FC I8-Nov-2002 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 06-Nov-2002 996,655.56 313589N41 MAT 11/062002 06-Nov-2002 -996,655.56 MT 06-Nov-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 15-N0v-2002 1,500,000.00 3133MCHF5 6.375%11/152002 DO 11/0810 15-N"-2002 -1,519,035.00 MT 15-Nov-2002 -19,035.00 INTEREST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1.0mo00.00 PHILADELPHIA ELEC CO IST MTO 01-Nov-2002 32,500.00 717537DCS 6.500%05/012003 DD 05/0119 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO&CO NT 01.Nov-2002 19,440.00 949740CH5 7200%05/01/2003 DO 0426/0 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2002 0.00 10-1)eo-2002 15:11:36 Ereeufhs Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. e0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOWDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATFJ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIOW SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Nov-2002 0.13 996087094 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 01-Nov-2002 63,000.00 0200D2AL5 7.875%05/01/2005 DO 0510110 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 01-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-2002 670.21 996085247 01-Now2002 0.00 IT 04-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Nov-2002 581.09 996085247 01-Nw-2002 0.00 IT 04-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 698.10 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 05-Nov-2002 5,980.74 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DD 10/2119 01-Oa-2002 0.00 IT 05-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN 00061 05-Nov-2002 21,658.00 37042WESO VAR RT 0SMn003 DO 08/03/ 05-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 05-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 06-Nov-2002 3,302.77 313589N41 MAT 11/062002 06-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 06-Nov-2002 0.00 10-De 2002 15:11:36 Executive Wm*bnmh' Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE. 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINIIDSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31,861.70 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-Nov-2002 1,499.26 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DD 0621/9 08-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 08-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH SR NT 08-Nov-2002 7,695.42 046003KHI FLTG RT 05/08/2003 DD 05/08/ 08-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 08-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 12-Nov-2002 9,417.22 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/112003 DD 05/11/ I1-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 12-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CRCO GLOBAL NTS 13-Nov-2002 9,596.11 345397RV7 FLTG RT 02M32003 DD 021131 13-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 13-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 61,331.16 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 13-Nov-2002 48,578.62 931641DD4 6.640%02J102011 DO 0221/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 13-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 15-Nov-2002 47,912.50 3133MCHF5 6.375%11/152002 DO 11/0810 15-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,050,000.00 TOSCO CORP GTD 1ST MTO BD 15-Nov-2002 43,312.50 991490AFI 8.250%05/152003 DO 051151 15-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 10-1)ea2002 15:11:36 Evaudw Work84rck Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 42 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 15-Nov-2002 33,750.00 345397OV9 6.750%0511512005 DO 05/2419 15-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-Nov-2002 720,125.00 9128276N7 05.750%11/152005 DO 111151 15-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 040 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 74,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-Nov-2002 2,514,375.00 9128276D9 06.750%05/152005 DO 05/15/ 15-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 15-Nov-2002 45,780.00 81240QGW6 6.54094 02/202003 DO 02201 15-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,213.40 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 15-Nov-2002 649.35 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12101/ 01-Oct-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31.26 GNMA POOL#0486720 15-Nov-2002 90.36 36210AVM6 6.000°h 12/152028 DO 12/0V 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,082.09 GNMA POOL#0491103 15-Nov-2002 1,028.26 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029 DO 0 110 1/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 Eveovtlw Workbeuh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE.' 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGaoaaoon 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFJ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7.39 GNMA POOL#0496294 15-Nov-2002 29.85 36210MJ51 6.000%0 111 5/2 02 9 DD 02/011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,837.86 GNMA POOL#0496461 15-Nov-2002 3.789.08 36210MQN4 6.000°/a01/15R029 DD 011011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,515.31 GNMA POOL 80497343 15-Nov-2002 191.96 362IONP45 6.000%12JI52028 DD 12/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37.531.32 FHLMC GROUP 8G4.0353 15-Nov-2002 1,859.57 3128DBMA2 7.50D%10/012004 DD 03/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 253.650.71 FHLMC GROUP BG5-0476 15-Nov-2002 3,289.22 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35.33 GNMA POOL OO499153 15-Nov-2002 113.29 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029DD02/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,274.59 GNMA POOL 80500917 15-Nov-2002 93.08 36210SPAO 6.000%0 411 52 029 DD 04101/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-1001 15:11:36 aeculive Wohbumh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 44 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,261.00 GNMA POOL 40503389 15-Nov-2002 3,410.92 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 881.11 GNMA POOLs0506636 15-Nov-2002 286.42 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,342.68 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Nov-2002 2,178.92 25475MAD6 5.840%10/172011 DO 031181 15-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 134,385.96 GNMA POOL80569358 15-Nov-2002 17,767.58 362000QK3 6.5000/604/152032DD04/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53.00 GNMA POOL80438057 15-Nov-2002 204.18 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152029 DD 05/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32,644.56 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 15-No,2002 6,377.42 3133TCE95 VAR RT 081152032DD 12/01/ 01-Oct-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,169.68 GNMA POOLN0457814 15-Nov-2002 358.65 36208QSS3 6.0 0 00/0 1 0/1 5 2 02 8 DO 10/011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dee-2002 15:11:36 Ere tine Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 45 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,683.45 GNMA POOL#0465546 15-Nov-2002 4,018.25 36209AET3 6.000%081152028DD08/Ol/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,267.94 GNMA POOL#0465555 15-Nov-2002 3,803.71 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028 DD 09/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63.51 GNMA POOL90467279 15-Nov-2002 206.80 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,073.83 GNMA POOL#0467286 15-Nov-2002 3,394.23 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57.92 GNMA POOL#0468330 15-Nov-2002 170.05 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DD 05/011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 60,647.31 GNMA POOL#0468339 15-Nov-2002 3,681.62 36209DHQO 6.0001/08/152028 DD OSIOU 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,546.44 GNMA POOL#0469688 15-Nov-2002 170.57 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028DD11/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-2002 13:11:36 E:ecurlve Workberxh Q Mellon Truq-Sam le Report PAGE- 46 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00600010600 03-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46.98 GNMA P001,0483452 15-Nov-2002 160.43 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP 4TR 00562 15-Nov-2002 19,563.76 37042WZKO VAR RT 02/14/2003 DD 02/14/ 15-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 15-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40.033.95 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH I8-Nov-2002 2,411.69 3837H INX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 18-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,067.57 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 19-Nov-2002 14,067.57 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO I M119 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN W TR 00459 19-Nov-2002 4,638.06 073928VC4 FLTG RT 12/012003 DD 08/171 19-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 GMAC NTS 19-Nov-2002 18,547.62 370425QV5 VAR RT 08/182003DD08/17/ 19-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 19-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,188.21 GNMA 11 POOL 00003109 20-Nov-2002 1,156.85 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DD07/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2002 0.00 lo-Dvo2002 13:11:36 Executive Wa kbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 47 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002-30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 86,000.61 GNMA II POOL 00003152 20-Nov-2002 5,877.43 36202DQD6 7.500%10/202031 DD 10/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,751.93 GNMA II POOL#0080023 20-Nov-2002 2,505.57 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 12/0119 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,962.35 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 20-Nov-2002 3,059.72 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0,00 IT 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,601.82 GNMA II POOL#0080395 20-Nov-2002 1,90208 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04202030 DD 04/01/ 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 143,995.91 ONMA II POOL 8080408X 20-Nov-2002 16,791A7 36225CN28 6.500%0520/2030 DO 051011 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 20-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 21-Nov-2002 3,355.00 31364CDD7 6.7100A 05212003 DO 05/21/9 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 21-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MTN 21-Nov-2002 588.23 3136FOYW6 VAR RT 02/212003 DO 0821/ 21-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 21-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-1002 15:11:36 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report P.4GE: 48 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-NOV-2002 -30-NOV-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Nov-2002 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.5001/o 09/252018 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 25-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,401.55 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 25-Nov-2002 4,956.24 398108AE4 7.4301/o 06/01/2003 DD 0229/0 01-Nov-2002 0.00 IT 25-Nov-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 29-Nov-2002 -36.48 990000P14 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 29-Nov-2002 0.00 CW 29-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Nov-2002 44,850.00 9128272M3 3.375%01115/2007 DD 011151 0.00 CD 29-Nov-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 29-Nov-2002 10,773.00 9128274Y5 3,875%01/152009 DO 01/151 0,00 CD 29-Nov-2002 0.00 10-Dec-2002 15:11:36 Eseculive Workbench STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on;(LCLPit v�yu/>% , 200 was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on /_.. , 200.),. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /ai -*day of 200 Penny M. KyK Secre Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District WWRDTMADMIMBS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC LAW OFFICES OF _ WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PAOFESSIONAL CORPORATION Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) Board Secretary MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: December 12, 2002 RE: Request for Waiver of Potential Conflict of Interest As you may be aware, the Orange County Water District has recently announced the retirement of its General Counsel, Mr. Clark Ide, and is in the process of recruiting for a replacement for that position. While Mr. Ida served as a full-time, in-house Staff Counsel, the OCWD has determined that it prefers to have services provided by outside Counsel under contract. Our Firm has been requested to submit a proposal for consideration, and we have elected to do so. We propose that Mr. Brad Hogin serve in the capacity as General Counsel, and to be principally assisted by Mr. Doug Holland. It Is not anticipated that I would personally have any efforts expended on an on-going basis for OCWD. A question has arisen as to whether any conflict of interest arises between OCWD and OCSD, and while there appears to be unanimous agreement at this time that there certainly is none, the fact remains that there Is the existing Groundwater Recovery System Program. I have reviewed this with Blake Anderson, and he has indicated that he could foresee no conflict, In that the objectives and desires of the Districts are synonymous. Nonetheless, the OCWD Is requesting that it be advised that OCSD is willing to waive any conflict of interest that may arise due to the fad that this Firm would be in a position of representing both agencies. As indicated, the only on-going matter that would possibly present this situation, would be the GWRS Program, and for that, our Firm already represents both agencies on a limited basis—namely, the defense of the sole item of litigation (Pall Corporation v. Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District). In the event true conflict ever did arise, this F Inn would recommend that both a gencies seek i ndependent counsel. This would n of result In any additional expense to either District, because our Firm would not be engaged in any work, nor Incur any costs payable by the agencies. I would respectfully request that the Board approve this waiver. I will be most happy to respond to any questions or inquiries by any of the Directors. '44IL-0-A.A&A, THOMAS L. WOODRUFF TLw:pl GENERAL COUNSEL Mends ti 1_ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT December 11, 2002 phone: 0141962 2411 fat: (7141962a356 To the Chair and Members www.Pm.so,a of the Board of Directors mailing Oede1f PO em6121P J Subject: Board Letter Nuntmn Valle,G 927288127 .crave.W . : The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 16e44 Ellis Avenue information on any of the items, please call me. Fauntain valley.M 92708 7018 Secondary Treatment Permit Application Submitted Aso c°h On December 2, 2002. our Board Chair, Shirley McCracken and I signed the • Secondary Treatment Ocean Discharge Permit Application. Prepared by the staff Cities and unanimously approved for submittal by the Board of Directors, the application formalizes the July 2002 decision of the Board to upgrade the wastewater treatment anaee,a facilities to meet the secondary treatment standards. Basile Park press The application was shipped to the EPA and the RWQCB for their review and Fountain Vallay Funenon determination. The next step will be the negotiation process, which could take Gerdan Grove anywhere from about six months to a year or longer. The current permit will remain in Hanung[sn 1a ne full force and affect until the new permit is adopted. La Habra La Palms Las Alamitos The final document is three large double-sided volumes (one main volume with ivewPwrt Beath appendices A-S), and the entire document is available on CD-ROM for easy access o''en9a to the regulators, Board and members of the public. The electronic version is also Plateaus San.Ana available on the District's website. The application could not have been completed Seat Beach without the help of staff from each and every single division here at OCSD as well as �P�n a number of expert consultants. This event is a major milestone in our wastewater Vila Park treatment history and truly is a legacy decision. Ysrbe Linea coa"ty of arante Disinfection Update sanitary Districts The disinfection system has been operating for over four months. We continue to �a.te mesa successfully disinfect the final effluent. The disinfection system is significantly ""away city reducing total coliform, fecal coliform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. November 2002 results for total coliform averaged about 8,700 MPN1100 ml, down from an Water Districts average bacteria level in the final effluent of 25,000,000 MPW100 ml prior to '„na Ranch disinfection. Our operational target is 180.000 MPN/100ml for total coliform. Staff continues to upgrade the temporary disinfection system by adding redundant piping, spare bleach pumps and by removing some bleach piping bottlenecks. Subject to Board approval in January 2003, construction on the permanent (3 to 5 years) disinfection system will begin. Construction be will complete in the fall of 2003. To maintain waH6class Ieaderai in wastewater,and water resource manaAemen[. Members of the Board Page 2 December 11, 2002 The disinfection program is in the optimization phase with all operating systems functional. Optimization will lead to fine tuning the chemical addition systems to achieve the desired disinfection results. Engineering will study the various long-term alternatives. I have asked Engineering to include a suitable consultation process with an informed community of interest—that is, third parties with sufficient background to provide us with informed opinions about the alternatives we consider and select. Secondary Treatment Standards Update The federal Clean Water Act defines secondary treatment as 30 parts per million (ppm) biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and 30 parts per million total suspended solids (TSS). We have assembled a team of operators, scientists, engineers, technicians and regulatory specialists we call 'Team 30-30'to achieve these standards in as timely a manner as we practically can. The Operations staff intends to have all the operationally available secondary facilities online by January 2003. The Operations divisions continue to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. Secondary treatment has reached 65% of primary treatment. Staff's goal was to reach 64%. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During November 2002, the final effluent quality averaged 36 ppm TSS and 58 ppm BOD. Keep in mind that because we intend to operate reserve capacity to achieve a high percentage of secondary treatment, whatever percentage we achieve is not sustainable in the next five years. Systems will and must be periodically taken out of service for maintenance and to construct new facilities. I assure you we will optimize operation to the extent possible, in the context of the best management practices and in the judgment of our professional staff. In short, while 65 percent secondary is our short-term target, there will be times that we won't have the capability to consistently achieve it. Biosolids Update On November 26, the Kern County Board of Supervisors adopted a new Class A biosolids ordinance. Kern County staff determined that the existing ordinance banning Class B biosolids would have been an inadequate regulation in that it would not have provided appropriate disclosure of information nor all necessary regulations regarding land application of Class A Biosolids. The new ordinance will continue the previously approved policy of banning the land application of Class B Biosolids beginning December 31, 2002. The Introduction of the new ordinance by Kern County included dismissing almost everything that the wastewater industry entered into the administrative record as irrelevant. Kern County Counsel informed the Board that, as expected, the Tulare County Superior Court ruled in favor of Kern County on the lawsuit filed by the wastewater industry that challenged Kern County's ban on the land application of Class B biosolids. An appeal is being prepared. Members of the Board Page 3 December 11, 2002 In anticipation of the ban on the land application of Class B biosolids, biosolids management companies and municipalities are developing Class A biosolids processes. Tule Ranch,the District's biosolids management contractor operating in Kern County, is constructing an on-farm biosolids chemical stabilization facility to produce Class A biosolids. Class A biosolids produced at this facility will be used on both the Kern and Kings County portions of Tule Ranch. I want to assure all members of the Board of Directors that we continue to believe that the use of Class B Biosolids on non-food crops in Kern and Kings Counties is a benefit to the farmers that use it and has no impact on the resources and people in these agricultural counties. It is extremely frustrating that unsubstantiated and exaggerated claims have turned so many people against a practice that is otherwise a sound, sustainable and environmentally sensitive practice. An article from the December 1, 2002 Bakersfield Californian on these developments is attached for your review. Fats. Oil and Grease (FOG) Program Earlier this year, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RW QCB) adopted General Waste Discharge Requirements to control sewer overflows in the region. The requirements name 31 co-permittees, including the District and its member agencies. A major requirement is the development and implementation of a grease control plan by each co-permittee, which must be submitted to the RW QCB by December 30, 2004. The District is taking the lead in conducting a comprehensive evaluation of grease control technologies and programs. The goal of the study is to create program and ordinance"building blocks"from which the co-permittees can select to create an effective FOG Control Program. The cost is funded jointly by the cities and local sewer agencies, County of Orange, and the District. To date, 19 co-permittees have contributed funding. Staff continues to work with our member agencies to collect the remaining local share of project funding. An interim report was just released that identified three high priority actions: characterization of sewer systems and FOG sources, resolving regional issues with appropriate regulatory agencies, and field testing of promising technologies. The District appreciates the cooperation received to date, especially the exceptional efforts by the FOG Control Steering Committee, whose members have contributed significant time and resources in support of the study and the efforts required to meet the regulatory deadlines. However, the District strongly encourages all member agencies to make resources available, including adequate funding and staffing to support the study. The District will keep member agencies apprised of developments as they arise. Members of the Board Page 4 December 11, 2002 AMSA Tracks SSO Rule Progress as EPA Debates Regulatory Alternatives AMSA has learned that internal EPA negotiations are continuing on the extent and description of various regulatory alternatives in the agencys proposed sanitary sewer overflow(SSO) preamble. As a result of current differences of opinion among the various EPA offices and Regions, the agency has held up the initiation of Final Agency Review (FAR)on the proposal, despite earlier predictions that this process would already be completed. The FAR process requires all relevant EPA offices to comment on the proposal and reach consensus on the draft rule's provisions and preamble discussion before releasing it to OMB. The FAR process usually takes about two weeks. OMB will then have 90 days to review the proposal. AMSA understands that EPA is hoping to begin the FAR process as soon as possible, but that the process will be delayed until the agency can arrive at a greater level of consensus internally on the preamble's discussion of alternatives. Among the alternatives that are being considered for inclusion in the preamble is AMSA's concept of using implementation of the capacity, management, operation and maintenance (CMOM) plans as the standard for SSO control, instead of the current zero overflow standard in the proposed rule. AMSA will keep its members informed of developments in the SSO arena as they occur. For further information, contact Greg Schaner, AMSA, at 202/296-9836, or aschaner@amsa-cleanwateroro Thirty Years of the Clean Water Act Attached is an excellent article from the November/December issue of Western Water on the Clean Water Act and the changes and influences on it over the last 30 years. It also poses some interesting questions on the future of the CWA, including whether to permit farm runoff and water transfers. I hope that you will take a few minutes to read it. OCBC Infrastructure Summit Attached is a flyer on the OCBC and Center for a New Orange County's Infrastructure Summit,which is scheduled for Tuesday, February 11, 8— 11:30 a.m. at the Hyatt Regency Huntington Beach. This is a follow-on to the OC Infrastructure Report Card. If you have questions regarding this program, contact OCBC Public Affairs—949 794-7217. Santa Ana River Interceptor Citizen Advisory Committee The Santa Ana River Interceptor Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) met on Thursday, December 5 for a project update. Project participants were re-introduced including the role of Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) presented by Rich Haller, Senior Project Manager at SAWPA. The possible participation and role of Public Facilities Resources Department was introduced. Concerns were expressed regarding a new agency taking over the project and public outreach. In Members of the Board Page 5 December 11, 2002 addition, a review and discussion of the preliminary findings of the eight alternative alignments took place. The next JMC meeting was announced to the CAC members for February 18. The results of a final draft report being prepared by Brown& Caldwell that examines the eight alternatives will be presented. A CAC meeting is being coordinated to take place following the February JMC meeting to present the final draft report to the CAC. Awards Communications has been recognized by two organizations: International Association of Business Communicators-- Helios Award -- Honorable Mention for Best Overall Video -- "Wastewater Treatment Options" -- Michelle Tuchman, Sonja Wassgren (Writing/production), Lisa Murphy (Editorial Assistance) SARBS-- Public Education Small Budget—"Wastewater Survivor'-- Ingrid Hellebrand, Oshyen Brevig, Sonja Wassgren (original idea and design), Allan Dumlao and Bernie DeAnda (design and construction) and a lot of hard work from many, many volunteers to set up and run the game at various sites such as the Children's Water Festival and Open House. Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like ei'onal information on any of the above items, please call me. Be e . derson General Manager SPA:jt G%WP.GTAU MIMAM, HERS TO THE WARM 12180 WMD LETTER. O Attachments Monthly Log of Odor Cominplaints-2002 mm _®_ ®{ice wi "S w IN m"a { '®0 l 'W's0 ! 2 '®' 0 m iml ---------------------------------------------------------- mo �� ��11 Fal, If Mal If ©o If Mr., o _XL If Jan If Jul If ma o mr �� �� ®o �c mry �� =I w ors mra m - mo 7ag ES o maw iWiso mo mo ors `V17 r! m-.n oo ®vim o mo �w ®M ©vim ®ram �� 1 PS m� ®MI o� mr� �a mo ors M5 M ern 3 M oo 7aRo mo ®o mm oo MIL va m"a mo mm mL.. my yea m E14� bakersfield.corn - Local News Page I of 3 Cbakemfield com a C&tCI610 ITZIUMAXI Horne News MarketPlace Entertainment Corntamity, Help News Home I Local I Business I Sports I Entertainment I Features I Opinion I Columnists I Religion Local news December 3, 2002 .................. ........_............._.._............... Homepage > News He > Local News IS Print this Article 0 Email this Article Discuss this Search BRYMI page ra , nRatloaa rCunam Industry wastes no time on search plans Editor Bob Christie Email By DAVIN McHENI Californian staff writer ®1661) 395-7413 e-mail:davinmchenry@bakemfield.com Recent Corrections... Sunday December 01,2002, 10'38:38 PM Columnists Robert Prim email With less than a month to go before a county ban on Recent column:: sludge takes effect, most spreaders and producers appear to be complying with the rules—even as they prepare for more court battles. SoaPBox In 1999,county supervisors voted to ban all but the cleanest sludge,called exceptional quality,from being spread on local farmlands.The ban takes effect Jan. 1 and Is aimed at the tons of Southern California sludge that have been pouring over the Grapevine and onto Kem County farmland for years. The byproduct of sewage treatment,sludge is a pastelike fertilizer used on feed crops.Also called biosolids, sludge is often used to reclaim marginal lands that couldn't support crops. piscuaaion tei Path other In online discussions Some of the most vocal opponents u sludge-spreading with other bakersneld.com users. have come from the agricultural industry itself.Several large fanning firms have argued for the ban—or even a Chat complete sludge ban—saying the federal guidelines just Participate in online chats with aren't Conservative enough. other bakersfield.com users. Sludge can contain disease-musing pathogens,heavy Newsletters metals and chemicals,they say. Stay up-to-date on local news and entertainment by getting "To put that on the ground,to put our water quality at risk newsletters sent to your email. purely for the advantage of providing a cheap disposal site for our neighbors to the south doesn't make sense."said sound off Paul Giboney,an agronomist for local grower M.Caratan Snare your criticisms, Inc. compliments or questions about news coverage.Questions are answered by Executive Editor Spreaders and producers of sludge argue there is no Mike Jenner. http://www.bakersfield.com/local/story/2251832p-231665Ic.html 12/3/2002 bakersfield.com - Local News Page 2 of 3 scientific evidence that their product harms people or foul Poll-prre_vlgLrs pollutes groundwater. Instead,they argue they are being agil run out of the county by agriculture giants who fear the The supreme Court said reputation of local crops could be tainted. Monday It will hear cases challenging affirmative action -them is no rational basis for the countys biosolids as It relates to univershy ordinance,"said Daniel Hyde,an attorney for the Los admission. Do you think Angeles County Sanitation District. minorities should oe given help to get Into universities? A coalition of spreaders and producers filed a lawsuit r' yes.Race remains an challenging the county's ban,but was rebuffed Nov.25 by issue In our country, and we a Tulare County judge who ruled the ordinance was must take extra steps to sound. ensure equality. f Maybe. I'm for the An appeal is expected. lower-court ruling that calls for schools to seek'a Even so,almost all local sludge spreaders am preparing meaningful number'ofminority students while for the ban-in various ways. avoiding fixed quotas. "Washington-based Yakima Co.,which had spread f No. Race-conscious sludge on local lands for more than a decade,packed up po ioe nts hurt some giving legots to and left Kern County in November.The company has appikless-qualified minority relocated to La Paz County in Arizona,where officials say prospects they will dry out the sludge at a landfill and continue IiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiJ spreading some on farmlands. The company takes with it sludge from Los Angeles County and the cities of Thousand Oaks, Fllmore,Ventura, Camarillo,Simi Valley and Santa Paula.Yakima president Jim Willett said his firth has actually added customers,despite the greaterdistance,some sludge has to be trucked. "It probably adds maybe$2 to the cost of the biowlids,'he mid.'Ifs a better situation for everyone." Yakima's departure will divert thousands of tons of sludge away from local lands.Since 1999, the company had spread more than 460,000 wet tons of sludge to land west of Shatter. What will become of those farmlands is uncertain.At the Buttonwillow Land and Cattle Co., partner Bill Tracy refused to say what his firm's plans am now that they no longer have access to sludge. "A businessman never divulges that kind of information,"he said. Spreader USA Transport has also remained tight-lipped about its plans post-Jan. 1.But county officials have been more talkative. According to the wunty's sludge inspector, USA Transport began beating its sludge more than a year ago.The company mixes the sludge with gypsum,a chalky substance that helps kill pathogens. The gypsum and sludge am currently being mixed with tractors on a concrete slab,according to the county. Eventually, USA Transport has plans to bring in a special mixer to do the work,said Guy Shaw,the county environmental specialist who monitors sludge spreaders. `they recognize that(mixing with tractors)isn't the best way to do R;Shaw said. Even without the mixer,the company has been able to produce exceptional quality sludge for the entire year, roughly 33.117 wet tons so far,Shaw added. Responsible Siosolids Management has also been able to reach the exceptional quality levels, http://www.bakersfeld.corn/local/story/2251832p-231665Ie.html 12/3/2002 bakersfield.com- Local News Page 3 of 3 thanks to the efforts of the city of Los Angeles.The city Is the sole source of sludge for RBM. So far the city says it has spent$20 million to produce only exceptional quality sludge by heating it to 127 degrees to kill off more pathogens. The additional treatment isn't believed to affect the level of heavy metals or chemicals,but it does cut down on the weight. We were producing 800 tons per day,now,we're down to abort 650 tons;said Judy Wilson, director of the cites waste-water department. The only wrinkle?The new, cleaner sludge apparently smells worse,county officials say. We're working witli them on that;Shaw said."That's an issue.It's not something we are going to ignore.' Farmer Sheen Magan is the only sludge spreader who has not said how—or even t—he plans to meet the county's exceptional quality requirements. In recent years Magan has accepted sludge from Los Angeles and Orange counties as well as the city of Santa Barbara. But this year he hasn'tspread any sludge in Kern County, instead pasting it on to his Kings County farmlands. Magan asked county supervisors Tuesday for permission to keep spreading the lower quality sluff for another four years,but was turned down.He has hinted that legal action may follow, even having an attorney speak for him at Tuesdays hearing. Even if all three remaining spreaders upgrade,the ban will not completely purge Kem County of the lower quality sludge. The county ordinance only affects unincorporated areas,meaning Kem's cities are free to produce and spread lower quality sludge freely. The cries of Bakersfield and Wasco both plan to continue to spread the lower quality stuff on farmlands.The city of Delarm has been stockpiling its sludge—which does not meet the exceptional quality requirements—and hopes to get a permit to spread from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. v Print its Article 0 Email this Arbde W Discuss this page GWink;ht 02002.LhB�ft—krafieM C4litomun l EmN lhg N'ogseir PdVOW P ksf sm_te_ment I Twins of use 06080 http://w .bakersfield.com/locaVstory/2251832p-231665Ic.html 12/3/2002 © his year marks the 30" under algae blooms and in perhaps the after Congress overrode a presidential anniversary of one of the most vivid display of all,Cleveland's veto that the CWA became law. most significant environ. oil-soaked Cuyahoga River caught fire "Overall,we're in much better mental laws in American in 1969. In other rivers throughout the shape than we were in the 1970s,and history, the Clean Water nation,the problems were as visible as the Clean Water Act is the primary Act(CWA).The law that emerged the open sewage that often washed reason that's the case,"said Tom from the consensus and compromise ashore. Howard,deputy director of the that characterizes the legislative Although the federal government California State Water Resources process has had remarkable success, had putative authority over the Control Board (State Board)."That reversing years of neglect and outright nation's waterways prior to the CWA, doesn't mean we've realized the goals abuse of the nation's waters. it was clear by 1972 that stricter we hoped to achieve." In 1972,only 30 to 40 percent of measures were necessary to reverse The CWA set two goals that the nation's rivers, lakes and coastal the onslaught of pollution discharges. underlie the mission of federal and waters were estimated to be safe for The Federal Water Pollution Control state regulatory officials:the elimina- swimming and fishing.Decades of Act,otherwise known as the CWA, tion of pollutant discharges into pollution dumping had rendered declared the intent to"restore and navigable waters by 1985 and fishable several high-profile waterways unin- maintain the chemical,physical and and swimmable waters by 1983. habitable for aquatic life.Lake Erie biological integrity of the nation's Environmentalists say public interest was literally dying, the Potomac River waters."The details of that process compels everyone in society,not in Washineum, D.C.• was choking were controversial,and it was only um teeulators and the regulated,to (i� 1 1. 4 A � iT RSA 1 1. strive for the attainment of the twin goals. "We need to keep the end of �"` 'fishable,swimmable'in mind,"said r„�-+'c:N _ Marguerite Young,California direcror of Clean Water Action."Implements _,.4" - tion of the law has become more accepting of some level of pollution It ,aa makes more sense to talk about waysk"; d.+ to prevent pollution in the first place." � `{^' But the effort to attain cleaner water is fraught with complexity. Trying to balance pollution prevention against the backdrop of daily human activity in 21"century America =' - inevitably forces the resolution of thorny and controversial issues that have the potential to cause significant - "- - ` L� impacts on people in urban and rural - settings. Meanwhile,the pressure to ensure consistent application of the Excess organic ollutants in water lead develop new water supplies throughout CWA nationwide.Concerns have to masi algae bloom. the West is predicated on the quality been raised that the Bush administra- of new water sources."Water quality tion is inclined to frame the law and rights are beginning to merge," around less federal responsibility and said Roger Pearson,editor in chief of more flexibility for states and point to keep California Environmental Insider,at an source dischargers. August legal conference on the CWA Those in the regulated community in Los Angeles."It's increasingly say it is not their aim to roll back the the end f 'fishable, impossible to deal with rights without CWA,but rather to strain a clearer r water quality." notion of its mechanisms so that Despite these issues,the CWA's resources can be put to use in the most achievements have been noteworthy. efficient manner.Scientists agree that swimmable' in To stem the flow of unregulated the process of determining ambient pollutants,cities have spent tens of water quality and the manner in which billions of dollars on wastewater pollutants cause detriment is comphi treatment plants that are required to sated and constantly evolving as;new meet effluent standards spelled out in research unfolds. discharge permits.The reduction of "While actual water quality toxic flows has dramatically improved conditions may remain static in a talk the health of rivers and lakes,as has water body,its assessed condition may s re sense s the regulation of pollution from change due to new standards,"states a nonpoint sources such as city streets 2002 report produced jointly by the and farmland. California Environmental Protection about ways to But segments of the nation's Agency and the Resources Agency. waters do not meet water quality "Advances in the understanding of the standards.A 2002 House resolution impacts of pollutants on human health commemorating the CWA notes that and the environment,as well as prevent pollution in "serious water pollution problems improvements in assessment technol- persist throughout the Nation and ogy and monitoring, may result in significant challenges lie ahead"in changes in the standards of assessment" protecting waters from pollution. Assigning reductions to nonpoint the first place." Activists strive for more vigorous sources of pollutants such as sediment, enforcement of the law, and stress that bacteria and nutrients are controver — Marguerite Young - a strong federal role is required to sial and,according to some, inor& NOVEMBERIDECEMBER 2002 nately expensive.However, it is a That expansion of control has Background natural course of progression because caused controversy in California, The heart of the CWAs authority lies of the improvements in water quality where local officials in Los Angeles, in the U.S.Constitution,which gives that have been achieved through end. Santa Ana,San Diego and San Congress the power to regulate of-pipe treatment."The low-hanging Francisco have appealed municipal commerce via navigable waters.At the fruit of low-cost, high-volume point stormwater permits that are viewed as dawn of the 20' century,lawmakers source reductions has largely been infringing on local land use.The case went a step further by requiring harvested,"states a 2001 report by highlights the argument over the costs permits for dredged refuse disposal to Resources for the Future,a Washing. of environmental compliance,and the keep interstate waters free from hazard. ton, D.C.,think tank."Today,signifi- extent to which rules that are designed The CWA,which built on previous cant water quality improvement to provide for the greater public federal water quality law,is centered implies the expansion of controls to benefit(i.e.clean water)collide with on a permitting system that defines nonpoint sources of pollution." practical,scientifically proven regula- pollutants,discharges and the waters mry policy. of the United States.That definition Meanwhile,other aspects of the has prompted recent controversy based clean water universe such as toxic on an U.S.Supreme Court decision pollutants,contaminated sediment, (see page 12).The CWA was amended thermal pollution and vessel sewage in 1987 to expand its authority to linger on the periphery,keeping the reduce nonpoint source pollution, n+E v� c�irz attention of potentially liable parties. particularly stormwater. 'a'� pt, nts More and more,the linkage between The CWA uses the mechanism of the CWA and safe drinking water has total maximum daily loads(TMDLs) become evident. to put waterways on the course toward c This issue of Western Wow attainment of water quality standards. examines the Clean Water Act upon TMDLs,which gained prominence in its 30's anniversary,and the debate the mid-1990s,are no less controver- that continues to swirl around its Sial today as regulators draw the nexus implementation.Included is a discus- between industrial and municipal sion of the challenge of cleaning up discharges,nonpoint source runoff and nonpoint pollutant sources,how ambient water quality conditions as regulators in California are attempting they piece together pollutant loads to mitigate the effects of agricultural designed to preserve water quality. runoff,the growing nexus between The TMDL process has been water quality and water supply and the marked by questions over the U.S. current efforts to more clearly define Environmental Protection Agency's 4' the law's linchpin of navigable waters. (EPA) authority to regulate nonpoint bG sources(federal judges say yes), the speed by which regulators are to U complete TMDL implementation plans(often spelled out by court order) and the debate over the listing and de-listing of waters as"impaired"by pollution.About 21,000 waters \.: nationwide have been listed as impaired.Officials base their decisions S" on the CWA and state equivalents, such as California's Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. (See the May/une 2001 Western Warn for more information on TMDLs-) Devising and implementing TMDLs has been a contentious rocess,often involving disputes - -s ong water quality officials,the lated community and clean water WESTERN WATER advocates.The pendulum of federal Research Council (NRC) report, s ij: r '► oversight swings between the delega• Assessing the TMDL Approach to tion of authority to states for impaired Quality Management. In it,a panel of waters lists to EPA's desire to approve/ experts determined that a more amend the list of impaired waters. science based approach is needed to Earlier this year, the Bush administra• improve the effectiveness of the - tion unveiled a proposal to revamp the TMDL program. Only six states have 'fix^ a YL i TMDL process by upping the ante on enough data to fully assess the condi. the amount of information needed to tion of their waters,according to the classify a waterway as"impaired"by General Accounting Office. �%: _ .•:.,'t.,;,a�,.," pollutants.From that,states could "State agencies need to use better determine whether enough data exist data and tools to establish appropriate to classify,a waterway as impaired,as water quality standards,determine ? m well as reclassifying the designated use, whether standards have been violated, S EPA's new proposal reverses a and develop restoration plans,"said @@ ^ >• i � l 2000 TMDL rule that was assailed by Duke University Professor Kenneth 6 tt •`�' y'++ dischargers as overly intrusive and Reckhow,committee chair."The stare ' ,✓r inordinately expensive.The Associa• of the science is sufficient to overhaul iJ g'+y_.. tion of State and Interstate Water the current lists of impaired waters and Pollution Control Administrators this aid states in determining more work- _ year urged EPA to adopt the new rule able solutions for cleaning them up." Z., :- "as soon as possible,"with the proviso — that stales be given the necessary =4"Lal flexibility to adjust to changing water Considerable controversy has sur. ">y quality scenarios. rounded the interpretation of the "The status quo is not a viable CWA as it applies to nonpoint option given the complexity imposed sources.The issue pits farmers and on the program by the plethora of timber interests against EPA on the 'E'x' litigation and because of the inherent matter of whether the latter has the uncertainty generated by a further authority to force actions to be taken delay,"wrote Thomas Morrissey, to protect a watershed against the lo��"The state of the association president. damage caused by excess runoff of Fnvirnnmrnrnlisrs believe the sodimonr. ,4grindniml interests chafe I,— c' ience is sufficient plan would relieve EPA of the respon- at the idea of the CWA being applied +il.ility of approving statc tramp to their di.charge., gives[tha laws plans,while providing states a loop. language about state management of .,to. ° hole to avoid TMDLs.Trusting the nonpoint pollution sources. states of completing the task is suspect The conflict found its way to current lists of because of the many years TMDLs federal court in a case called Pronsolino were ignored, they say."In the general v. EPA.The plaintiffs sued EPA after sense, this is an issue of extreme their attempt to harvest timber was interest and high importance for the hampered by the agency's TMDL environmental community,"said Joan restrictions for the Garcia River, Mulhern, legislative counsel for which curtailed the scope of logging ,ts, r-�"•• Farthjustice."Our overarching and the construction, use and mainte• concern is that EPA shouldn't be nature of roads and skid trails.The resetting the clock and rewriting the Garcia River sediment TMDL is 552 .' .1 rules at this juncture." tons per square mile,which is allo EPA officials say the agency would cated annually among different still oversee state pollution control categories of nonpoint source runoff..{ efforts but that the idea is to give To comply with the TMDL,state q states a more cost,effective way of officials required the plaintiffs to managing the program. mitigate 90 percent of controllable Underlying the EPA proposal are road-related sediment runoff and to ;«� the findings of a 2001 National restrict logging from mi&October NovEstuu/DECEMBER 2002 "Nonpoint source until May 1.The restrictions cost an The California Farm Bureau estimated$750,000 to comply with, Federation(Farm Bureau) has ped- according to a court document. boned for a rehearing of the case, pollution is the The crux of the case centered on based on the assertion that nonpoint the ability of EPA to impose TMDLs sources should be regulated differently on wamn impacted only by nonpoinr than point sources."The reason fm sources.Farm groups argued that this distinction is simple,"the petition dominant water Congress did not intend to apply states."Unlike [point source]pollu- TMDIs to waters affected solely by tion,neither rainfall nor runoff occurs nonpoint source pollution,but the with the predictability and precision U.S.Ninth Circuit Coun of Appeals, contemplated by strict quantitative quality problem in in a May 31, 2002,decision,found effluent limitations and TMDL that TMDLs apply"whether a water controls." body receives pollution from point sources only,nonpoint sources only, Stormwater Permits the United States or a combination of the two." "Seems it never rains in southern "This decision affirms our efforts California,"goes the old 1970s tune, to continue using a strong tool to help but such is definitely not the case,and restore America's riven and clean up therein lies the blessing and the curse. pollution, regardless of in source,"said Rainfall is most welcome in the Wayne Nastri,EPA regional adminis- perpetually dry Southland,but the mix valor,in a press release."Nonpoint of pollutants washed from city and source pollution is the dominant water residential streets into stormdrains is quality problem in the United States not. Indeed, the"first Bush"associated today." with the first rain of the season in Los The Ninth Circuit panel agreed Angeles has a noticeable effect at that point sources are treated differ- drainage outfalls where the runoff endy from nonpoint sources for many filled with trash,suspended solids, purposes under the CWA,but that pathogens, motor oil,benzene,copper "there is no distinction with regard to and lead dumps into the sea. the basic purpose for which the The problems presented by the The*fi.t flush'wercuited with the firat [impaired waters]list and TMDLs are regulation of stormwater runoff are min of the season hes a noticeable impact compiled,the eventual attainment of formidable in their complexity,much state-defined water quality standards." more so in areas the size of Los Ange- gutw�filled with h. _ les.The CWA's provision for munici- =� pal separate stormwater permin recognizes the need to control the amount of pollution generated by urban,impervious surfaces.The _. ._. _ __ •�� approach was handled rather routinely _ in years past as regulators and city officials relied on a system of best c.,. _. management practices(BMPS) to minimize the Bow of untreated contaminants to drainage ourfalls. ' ,t r But the advent of TMDLs along > lie 4 with an increasing population has put pressure on the state to clamp down on polluted stormwater runoff."The ultimate responsibility for the pollut- ant discharges, increased runoff and inevitable long-term water quality _ degradation that results from urbaniza- tion lies with local governments," states a fact sheet issued by the San WESTERN WATER Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board.'"Mis responsibility is based on104 _� the fact that it is the local govern- '� � - 'BEACH CLOSED menu that have authorized the +..1�=.v?.+�-' urbanization. . . and the land uses that _ generate the pollutants and runoff." With that in mind,critics contend the state has proceeded with permit provisions"that are seen as vague, j ambiguous and beyond the authority of the regional boards,"according to _. .r- San Diego attorney Rufus Young, in a paper prepared for the Los Angeles "` CWA legal conference. In December 2001,a revised problem is they didn't conduct a cost- the Southern California Coastal Water discharge permit was issued for the city benefit analysis first."The coalition is Research Project (SCCWRP),a joint and county of Los Angeles.The plan concerned that the permit could cost powers agency that has devoted aims to minimize the effect of new as much as$54 billion if stormwater significant amounts of time and mnoff from sites such as new homes, is collected and treated. resources to evaluate the impact of industrial developments,gasoline Dennis Dickerson,executive pollutants on the near shore environ- stations and parking lots.This is officer of the Los Angeles Regional ment. accomplished through permit condi- Water Quality Control Board,said at The agency notes that while tions that specify building and grading the conference that the cost estimates "dramatic improvements"have been permits as well as development and for permit compliance"vary widely," made in sewage discharges the past 20 redevelopment requirements that but that"we believe that an awful lot years,the same cannot be said for the emphasize clustered housing so as to of improvement can be made through water quality of storm runoff.Several allow the remaining property to cost-effective BMPs lthatl are very areas have begun treating dry weather remain pervious to rainfall. reasonable." flows,a trend that is likely to increase. Rufus Young said the provisions of "Without controls,stormwater Stormwater treatment"is a much more the stormwater permit amount to the pollution will get worse,"he said. difficult task"because"routing stare taking private property without "Upstream communities have to stormwater to existing sewage treat- compensation.That, in mro,deprives recognize their responsibility." ment plants would easily exceed their local authorities over land use deci- Howard said there are water treatment capacity,resulting in spills sums;in their jurisdiction."Unless the quality consequences due to past of raw sewage in the ocean and on city Water Resources Control Board is development and efforts must be made screen,"according to SCCWRP.It is willing to help pay cities for general to limit the source of pollutants and also unlikely that stormwater could be plan updates, that's a big'F on the their flow to the ocean."Nobody's treated the same way as municipal scoreboard,"he said.In a written suggesting they can't develop or sewage because"such an approach presentation for the conference,he redevelop land,"he said."But there is would be extremely expensive,require noted"there are no findings that an environmental cost to development huge areas of land,and may be infea- imposing. . .controls on new and and they need to absorb that cost sible from an engineering perspective." redevelopment projects will improve locally." New research into the nature of water quality." beach water quality may require a Leading the charge to revise the Beach Water Data complete revision of the monitoring, Los Angeles permit is the Coalition for Underpinning the regulatory efforts according to some researchers.At Practical Regulation,which includes in southern California is the effort to Huntington Beach,which has repeat- dozens of cities,businesses,and labor keep area beaches clean and acces- edly been closed during peak summer and taxpayer groups.Coalition sible.In recent years,beaches from periods due to spikes in bacteria levels, spokesman Jeff Hobbs said everyone Los Angeles to San Diego have tests have shown that contaminated agrees about the need to reduce periodically been shut down due to portions of water typically disappear polluted runoff,but that it is incum- high bacterial counts,a situation that within hours. However,under current bent upon the state to offer require- translates into lost business and a reporting protocol,high contaminant ments that are proven and cost- tarnished public image for several readings automatically shut down effective."It's a matter of the regional coastal communities.Tasked to study beaches for at least 48 hours in most board with good intentions. . .but the the matter of beach water quality is occurrences.The practical effect, NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2002 9 500 miles of rivers and creeks in the Central Valley have been classified as impaired by agricultural pesticides. The Central Valley Regional Board's denial of the petition led to a lawsuit to overturn the waiver.Mean. while,a state law that revokes waste discharge waivers as of Jan. 1, 2003, increased pressure on the State Board to regulate irrigation flows. In March _ 2002,the State Board announced plans to study the issue for the purpose of devising a new pollution control strategy. Board Chair An Baggett said the state's nine regional water boards would likely devise various means to regulate discharges-"Some waivers will be re-adopted,others will be replaced by specific or general orders and some scientists say, is that many beaches may be regulated in other ways,"he end up being closed when there is said. no threat to public health. Marguerite Young said the State "The bacteria issue is a tough Board is facing a"major policy deci- one,"Howard said."Repeated sam- sion that clearly could have a far- pling shows wide variability in bacte- reaching impact]and]will set a rial concentrations and the length of precedent for tackling agriculture and time of contamination." other nonpoint source contributions." In the wake of the lawsuit,the Permits for Farm Runoff? Farm Bureau announced plans to The authors of the CWA,seeking to intervene on behalf of the state, gain control over point source dis- arguing that nonpoint runoff from charges,exempted the flow of irriga- farms is difficult to quantify and would tion water from the law's purview. be extremely expensive to regulate. Fames were seen as the least of the The case is in abeyance until after s nation's water quality problems in the the first part of 2003. 1970s,given the more pressing task of To guide the stare's decision on cleaning up rivers and lakes.The the matter,a coalition of agricultural regional water boards conditionally interests advised that an interim waived the responsibility of farmers waiver be issued while further moni- to obtain waste discharge permits. toting and environmental review r Instead,polluted farm runoff was to proceeds.Ultimately, it is in the state's be curtailed through BMPs and best interest to adopt a permanent incentive programs. waiver,agricultural interests say.A That waiver remained the status paper presented to the State Board by ' quo for 20 years,until activists decided the Farm Bureau and other groups it was time to take action against the notes chat"due to the sheer number pesticides,fertilizers and other con- of individual dischargers,a program r taminants flowing from fields to that incorporates individual waste surface waters.In late 2001, discharge reports fro agriculture will WaterKeepers and the California not be administratively feasible." Public Interest Research Croup(Cal Those behind the petition say an PIRG) petitioned the Central Valley interim waiver is acceptable,but that Regional Water Quality Control Board the state's long-term solution requires to abandon the waiver in favor of an environmental impact review that more stringent controls.More than could take as long as three years to WESTERN WATER L complete."The question is,what is in 2002 Western Water."Our reliance on adopted through formal mlemaking. place until then,"said Teri 011e,Cal Colorado River water is much higher Environmentalists have challenged PIRG toxic program director."Our today than we thought it was going to transfers on the basis of such pollua position is we would like to see fanners be 15 years ago.That also means we ants as total dissolved solids, turbidity submit reports of waste discharge." are relying on a much saltier base and temperature. supply.So you do have to worry more The possibility of discharge The Need for Clean Water about quality today than in the put." permits for transfers would have For years, the aim of maintaining an The growing demand for water tremendous mmifications in Califor- adequate water supply and cleaning means a greater reliance on recycled nia,with is SWP and Colorado River surface waters progressed along water as well as sources heretofore Aqueduct. "The scarier part is the bifurcated pathways,sometimes untouched because of relatively low State Water Project has all these intersecting,but generally falling water quality."If we treat this water, tumouts along the line,"said Steve along the sepamte realms of water who owns itV'Baggett said."It's a Anderson,an attorney with Best,But resources and environmental protec- complex water rights issue:' and Krieger,at the CWA legal confer- tion.That regulatory framework has ence."Will there have to be individual become more intermingled in recent Permits for Water Transfers? permits for each commit?" years as a growing demand emphasizes Lingering in the regulatory universc is Permitting transfers was discussed the need for a dean,plentiful supply. the possibility that water transfers in the midA990s by the Lahontan "The question is how to reconcile could be required to include a pollut- Regional Water Quality Control the obvious gap that exists,"said ant discharge permit if receiving Board,which raised the issue regarding Marguerite Young."The Stare Board waters are less polluted than the water SWP water used for groundwater doesn't necessarily think of protecting that is to be transferred.Not surpris- recharge in the Mojave Basin.The every stream for drinking water, ingly,those with a keen interest in the Lahontan Regional Board's staff has though most streams are designated matter are more than a little anxious provided"verbal assurances"that for municipal use." about the prospect of clearing another pertain will not be pursued,according Although the Safe Drinking regulatory hurdle. to the Mojave Water Agency.How- Water Act regulates drinking water "From my perspective,water ever,concern remains about the long. quality.TMDLs have been drawn up transfers already are difficult to term implications of imported water for constituents such as salt and total implement because the storage, u a source of salts that would not dissolved solids(TDS).Meanwhile, conveyance,pumping,distribution, otherwise be introduced into the greater knowledge continues to emerge contractual,and endangered fish basin. about the threats posed by existing species issues must all be satisfied Environmentalists say that in contaminants and the potential harm within a very small window of oppor- issuing approvals to transfer water,the to the environment from substances tunity,"said Phil Dunn,director of State Board must protect downstream like prescription dmgs that pass water resources and aquatic sciences at beneficial uses,including fish and through the treatment process un- EDAW."Getting a transfer approved wildlife,from adverse impacts caused touched.Scientists are probing the can be like throwing a ball through by the transfer of water.That includes issue as technology provides for 10 or so windows of varying sizes as the loss of the capacity to dilute detection at even smaller quantities. they open and shut.If one window pollutants."Insofar as it eliminates "We've always deemed water shuts at the wrong time,the entire instream flow,removal of water quality an important issue,"said Larry transfer can be jeopardized."Applying essentially increases the concentration Joyce,supervising water quality the CWA to water transfers would of all pollutants downstream,"said scientist for the State Water Project "add one more window that the ball Bill Jennings,director of DeltaKeeper. (SWP)."The emphasis has changed... would need to travel through." Imposition of permits would from period to period,based on the The issue has gained momentum obviously slow down the transfer constituent of concern." through court decisions in New York approval process,Dunn said,noting Municipal water suppliers,faced and Florida,which have required that regional water board staff cut. with stricter drinking water quality discharge permits for transfets,based rently provide consultation on trans. standards,see firsthand the impact of on the polluted status of the trans- fen.Typical transfers from northern to constituents besides those that are fened water.Although several EPA southern California don't have water treated to make water safe for human policy statements opined that releases quality impacts because of the excep- consumption."Drinking water quality from dams should not be considered tional quality of the transferred water, standards are changing,"said the discharges under the CWA,the he said. Metropolitan Water District's Tim guidance is of little value in legal For the time being,the idea of Quinn,in the September/October proceedings because it was never requiring discharge permits for tram- NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2002 11 The past 30 years firs remains decidedly low profile experts.A case called Solid Wtme among stare and federal regulators, Agency of Norrhem Cook County,v. who have their hands full managing U.S.Army Corps of Engineers involved of the CWA have pollutant discharges from regulated a proposed landfill for Chicago suburbs sources. "We have not seen any located in a former quarry where ponds substantial water quality problems and puddles form.The Corps inter- been marked by caused by transfers so we have not vened in the approval process,claim- focused attention on the issue," ing that the seasonal pools fall under Howard said. the CWNs protection. significant progress Anderson said that while"we In a 5-4 decision,the Supreme can't wholly predict"how the matter Court found that the law's protections cleanupin the might be resolved in federal court,the do not extend to the waters discussed Ninth Circuit Court has already in the Illinois case.Writing for the hinted that, if faced with the issue, it majority,Chief Justice William waters.the nation's may hold that discharge permits are Rehnquist noted that"no persuasive required for the addition of pollutants evidence"had been presented to show by Inge water conveyance facilities. that Congress intended navigable As regulators, waters to mean isolated,non-navi- What are Navigable Waters? gable waters. But Justice John Paul An emerging battleground in the Stevens, in a dissenting opinion,found debate over CWA implementation is that by its nature,the CWA serves to the possible reworking of the basis of protect wildlife and habitat,and for federal authority over the nation's wetlands and isolated inland lakes, waters.The issue culminated in a "that interest is equally powerful, noteworthy 2001 U.S.Supreme Court regardless of the proximity of the decision that ruled the law does not swamp or the water to a navigable scientists and extend to isolated wetlands that stream." provide habitat for migratory birds or The ramifications of the court s others endangered species.On one hand,the decision are"enigmatic at best,"wrote look toward case has sparked fears that develop- Jennifer Buffalo in a February 2002 men could run roughshod over California Research Bureau report. the next 30 years sensitive areas. Proponents say the "It might be the beginning of a series court restored some sensibility to the of decisions that limit federal wetland law's interpretation. protection to traditional navigable and beyond, many "In a mandate for honesty in waterways,their tributaries,and some bureaucracy, the court called a halt nearby wetlands. .. Or,the ruling to some of the federal government's could end with a practical effect rather issues, some slippery misinterpretations of the less than that."Environmentalists, Clean Water Act,"wrore Harold while disagreeing with the court,note Johnson with the Pacific Legal that the decision did not overturn extremely Foundation. "In the process,the court earlier cases regarding the CWNs reaffirmed that land use oversight rests authority over wetlands primarily with local and state officials, "The Corps can still find an problematic, must not Uncle Sam." isolated wetland to be jurisdictional Section 404 of the Clean Water if its use or degradation would affect Act requires permits for the dredging interstate commerce through some- be resolved while and filling of all navigable waters of thing other than use by migratory the nation. Federal law defines birds,"noted Caml Witham at her oversight proceeds. navigable waters as"all waters of the website,www.vemalpools.org. United States."The U.S.Army Corps Federal lawmakers unhappy with of Engineers (Corps),responsible for the court ruling have introduced issuing the permits,has interpreted legislation that would delete the term the law to include wetland areas far "navigable"from the CWA and clarify removed from navigable waters,a that Congress'primary concern was to stance that has been supported by legal protect the nation's waters from Ll 2 WESTERN WATER pollution,and not the navigability of permits are going to be different from waterways. now on,and there may be a need to go to tertiary treatment." Summary The tightening squeeze on Enforcement of the CWA is a complex municipal wastewater treatment plants process that more often than not leaves has translated into millions of dollars one or more sides dissatisfied with the in costs to upgrade the facilities. outcome.Point sources complain Agencies are able to finance some of about the difficulty in meeting ever- the costs,but in some instances, the tightening discharge limits,especially price of cleaner water gets passed on given the unknown pollutant contri- as higher rates to property owners. butions by nonpoint sources.Mean- The issue stretches to the cost of while,groups that have traditionally buying a house as well,as new regula- been categorized as nonpoint sources, tions require developers to include such as farmers and loggers,argue they smrmwater retention and treatment were exempted from the CWA for a facilities on commercial and private . practical reason and that they can development of more than one acre. protect water quality through volun- Marguerite Young said the focus ,Ir tary BMPs and other incentives. should be changed to pollutant Environmental groups,which reduction,given that for many dis- , 7, periodically release"report cards"on chargers,fines assessed for violations the number of discharge violations are viewed as little more than the and subsequent enforcement actions, price of doing business.Some environ- '€ say state and federal agencies need to mentalists suggest a revised fee ' d be more aggressive in their pursuit of structure that rewards for reduced r . illegal dumping.An August 2002 toxicity discharges.On a larger scale, report by the U.S.Public Interest others fear that the entire balance of r Research Group found that nearly water quality and supply is threatened 30 percent of the nation's largest by the growing demand for water. a discha sera were in"serious violation" The past 30 years of the CWA of their permits at least once between have been marked by significant January 2000 and March 2001.The progress in the cleanup of the nations grtwp mrommends rmigher penalrin. narers. As regnlarors,dischargers, increased access for citizens'lawsuits environmentalism,scientists and and expanded public information others Wk toward Elie next 30 years about the types of discharges made to and beyond,many issues,some waterways. extremely problematic,must be Heightened enforcement has been resolved while oversight proceeds. realized in California under a new law Point source dischargers,the object of that makes fines mandatory for many the CWA,have managed to dramati- water quality violations.At the same tally reduce the amount of pollutants time,the State Board has revamped discharged to surface waters. With that its enforcement policy in an effort to accomplished,attention has turned to bring greater consistency throughout tightening controls even further to the nine regions.Meanwhile,the mke on contaminants such as dioxin, California Toxic,Rule has created a which pose a threat at minute levels. "logjam"of permit challenges and Howard said the state's increased enforcement actions.The result is a attention to smaller amounts of steady drumbeat of scientific study, pollutants is partly recognition of the technological upgrades and intensified overburdened state of the state's efforts to halt pollutants at the source. waters."The whole system is going to "We am,trying to make the rules be different,"he said."The rules are as workable as possible,but we are different now and the permits are facing gridlock on our permits," going to be different.People have to Howard said."The reality is these get used to it. 4 NOVEMBERfDECEMBER 2002 13 a _ SCAan cz"L&— VNS( KINGAAN: 11ssnn ig CAPITOL ORRCE SANNINOAND FINANCE CC��"�� 5 STATE CAPITOL COMMn1EE9: P.O.SOX WM9 EU8Crl)NSFF�AND Iifnrnin �P$islafnIP SACRAMENIO.CA 992496971 CONSTfIU110NAL AMENDMENTS (916)319-M71 FAX(916)319 2171 ENERGYCOSTSANOAVAILASILITY DISTRICT OFFICE UnUTIES AND COMMERCE 1W N.TUSTIN AVENUE./1W MEMBER: ORANGE.CA MINIS LITTLE HOOVER COMMISSION (716)999AHB0 BILL CAMPBELL FAX(714)999-71W 1-0Wff0509$ ASSEMBLYMAN.SEVENTY-FIRST DISTRICT E-Mail: AnomdynunapempTte.9w November 21,2002 Ms. Shirley McCracken Board President OC Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley CA 92708-7018 rAIr1J Dear Ms. Mc ken: Please accept my sincere appreciation for the beautiful recognition given to me last night at the Board of Directors meeting. It was truly a pleasure. As I said to you last night, I rarely am on the receiving end of resolutions. It was very kind and very much appreciated gesture. Thank you again. Sincerely, All BILL CAMPBELL Assemblyman 71"District BC/dml OFFIC.- 0:THE MAYOR EEC 0 S 2002 ARC CITY C 1113L Page 1 of 2 Tappan, Jean From: Anderson, Blake Sent: Tuesday, December 03,2002 7:41 AM To: EMT; Colston,Jim; Moore, Michael; Herberg,Jim;Director Brian Brady; Director Jim Silva; Director Norm Eckenrode; Director Pat McGuigan; Director Shirley Mc Cracken; Director Steve Anderson Subject: Governor's Executive Order Regarding State Spending Our reading of this order is that it does not impact any pending state grants. Blake >1 M6/02 16:45:24 Executive Order D-64-02 >EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT >STATE OF CALIFORNIA >EXECUTIVE ORDER D-64-02 >by the >Governor of the State of California >WHEREAS,the economies of the nation and California have not recovered from the recession that began in 2001;and >WHEREAS,California continues to be severely affected by a sharply reduced demand for the goods and services of its high technology sector and overseas demand for California-made goods and services;and >WHEREAS,the continuing decline in the stock market will lead to reduced state income tax receipts from capital gains and stock options and in substantially lower personal income tax, sales tax, and corporation tax revenues; and >WHEREAS.as a result of the economic recession, demand for state services and financial assistance for education,health care,and other services is growing significantly,and >WHEREAS,absent immediate corrective action, the State will be unable to meet its obligations under the current budget as enacted by the Legislature in August 2002; >NOW,THEREFORE, I,GRAY DAVIS, Governor of the State of California, by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes of the State of California,do hereby issue this order to become effective immediately: >1. State agencies and departments shall identify all General Fund savings by reducing expenditures in the current fiscal year wherever possible. State agencies and departments shall take the following actions immediately, where permissible: >' Reduce, postpone,or cancel new contracts or amendments to existing non-essential contracts to lease or purchase equipment that increase State costs. >' Reduce, postpone,or cancel new contracts or amendments to existing contracts for non-essential consultant or personal services that increase State costs. >'Where permissible,cancel all other contracts for non-essential goods and services. >'Cancel out-of-state travel and in-state travel,except travel for essential functions such as coordinated federallstate/local public safety efforts and revenue-generating and other critical activities. 12/3/2002 Page 2 of 2 An taking the above actions, agencies shall give preference to retaining contracts with California companies and businesses where appropriate. >2.State agencies shall disencumber non-essential contracts or purchase agreements funded by appropriations from prior years,where goods and services have not been received, and to cancel the related contracts,where permissible. >3.Agency Secretaries and other Cabinet level officials are responsible for ensuring compliance with the provisions of this Executive Order. For those agencies that do not have Cabinet level representation, the Department of Finance will be responsible for ensuring compliance. - >4.The provisions of this Executive Order shall not apply to the Legislative and Judicial branches of government. However, I invite these branches to participate. >5. For the purposes of this order,the University of California and the California State University System are requested to consult with the Department of Finance for the purpose of implementing the provisions of this Executive Order. Participation, however,should be structured so as to minimize interference with their educational mission. >6.The Department of Finance is hereby directed to coordinate the implementation of this Executive Order and may issue specific instructions and grant exemptions with regard to its provisions,as appropriate. >7.This Executive Order will remain in effect until June 30,2004. >I FURTHER DIRECT that as soon as hereafter possible,this order be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State and that widespread publicity and notice be given to this order. AN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State of California to be affixed this the twenty-sixth day of November 2002. >/et Gray Davis >Governor of California 12/3/2002 Tappan, Jean From: Anderson, Blake Sant: Tuesday, December 03,2002 8:16 AM To: Tappan,Jean Subject: Board Letter Los Angeles Times December 1.2002 ENVIRONMENT Interagency Spats Muddy the Water By Mark Gold, Mark Gold is the executive director of Heal the Bay Californians want clean water. They want beaches and wetlands protected.They want quality water coming from their taps. And they are willing to pay for it. Voters have consistently demonstrated their commitment to clean water and coastal protection at the polls over the last few years, most recently in approving, last month,the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water,Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002, which allocates$3.4 billion for purchasing and restoring wetlands and watersheds and for funding water projects that will both protect the supply and improve quality. In the last two years, Californians have voted to spend more than $8 billion on clean water and coastal resource protection. So if voters are in agreement,even during tough economic times, why can't the agencies and regional governments responsible for solving our water quality problems get along? Instead of taking the voters' strong message to heart,those most closely involved with water issues are ever more bitterly divided. The EPA in Washington doesn't see eye to eye with its regional EPA office in San Francisco, which isn't getting along with the state Water Resources Control Board in Sacra-mento, which in turn disagrees on many issues with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board.The regional water board gets along with the environmental community on some issues but not all. Los Angeles County, numerous small cities,the Western States Petroleum Assn., the California Building Industry Assn., the L.A. County Sanitation Districts and the city of Los Angeles are sparring with the regional water board, state water board,EPA or the environmental community on most issues. Pick your water quality issue,and you'll find the regulatory community at odds with the regulated community that is in turn at odds with the public and community-based organizations.The level of distrust and animosity on water quality issues has reached a level not seen since the 1980s, when anti-environmentalist Interior Secretary James Watt actively sought to degrade the nation's precious natural resources, and California, led by Gov. George Deukmejian, found it more convenient to simply ignore water quality issues. Today,the easier-to-solve water quality problems, like upgrading coastal sewage treatment plants, have largely been addressed. Now we face the more complex remaining issues of polluted runoff. The state seems content to exert its leadership on water quality and coastal protection issues solely through spending voter-approved bond money on habitat preservation and structural measures to improve water quality. Meanwhile, many of the cities and counties charged with improving water quality are crippled by fears of 1 litigation, liability and increased costs as developers, sewage agencies, industry and even other cities have grown skilled in their use of the legal system to fend off unwanted change. Take the case of Malibu. The California Coastal Commission requires that every coastal city have a local coastal plan that lays out policies and requirements for managing fragile resources.In most of California,the plans have been expeditiously produced. But in the current environment,the Malibu plan has become a battleground. Residents insist the Coastal Commission is violating their property rights. Bitter fights have erupted over access to beaches and protection of sensitive habitats.Residents claim the proposed regulations are so tight that they would prohibit homeowners from planting rose bushes on their properties. And environmentalists accuse beachfront homeowners of trying to preserve the coast for the exclusive use of the rich. The fights grew so contentious that the city refused to implement the plan at all, and now five developers and the city of Malibu are suing the Coastal Commission over the matter.The backlash has some Malibu residents, developers and their supporters vowing to try to oust Coastal Commission Chairwoman San Wan,the most knowledgeable, pro-environment commissioner the agency has ever had. In Los Angeles and Ventura counties,the situation has gotten so bad that nearly every permit and regulation proposed by the Los Angeles regional water board is now appealed to the state water board in Sacramento or challenged in court.Discharge permits for numerous sewage-treatment plants,a municipal storm water permit for Los Angeles County and new trash limits for the Los Angeles River and Ballona Creek have all been held up by appeals. Meanwhile, the state seems to be working at cross-purposes with itself. Even as the state water board spends hundreds of millions of dollars in bond funds aimed at improving water quality,it is also implementing regulations that severely weaken the EPA's National Toxics Rule water quality standards for fresh water, bays and estuaries. The state has also proposed removing some of California's most polluted waters from the priority list for cleanup. In addition,the state water board has issued statewide draft regulations on septic systems and industrial sources of storm water that do little more than maintain the status quo, which means that far too many waters will remain polluted by fecal bacteria, nitrates and toxic heavy metals and hydrocarbons. In Los Angeles County, where two-thirds of the voters approved the most recent water quality bond measure, nearly 40 small cities have banded together with the Building Industry Assn. to form the Coalition for Practical Regulation. Using public funds, the group has developed a slick marketing campaign and retained high-priced attorneys to oppose all new storm water quality regulations. Tens of thousands of mailers have gone out to the public with Chicken Little-like threats of imminent financial harm and loss of libraries,police and firefighters if water quality regulations are promulgated. Ten years from now, long after the$8 billion in clean-water bonds passed in recent years has been spent,the public will judge the success of these bond measures in a simple way. Are our beaches safer for swimmers and surfers?Is our tap water safer?And are our precious coastal and watershed resources better protected? Capital projects to improve water quality, and spending bond funds to purchase some of the few remaining coastal watershed natural resources,will certainly lead to progress in these areas. But unless the state,the EPA, the business community, local governments and the environmental community can come together to develop and act on solutions to California's crises regarding clean water and coastal resource protection,then the state will have lost a tremendous opportunity to deliver on the promise of waters that are safe and healthy for people and aquatic life. 2 If you want other stories on this topic,search the Archives at latimes.com/archives <htti)://www.latimes.com/=hives>. Click here for article licensing and reprint options <http://www.icoovriaht.com/3.5555? icx url=htto://www.latimes.com/la-op-goldldecOl.httnlstorv> Jennifer Communications 3 cr t r Calif. farmers to take more from Colo. River Page I of I a1cc 111N1:rofNw ' Ga PRINTTHIS aztentral Sporsared by tt • Calif. farmers to take more from Colo. River By Shaun McKinnon The Arizona Republic Nov.27.2002 Southern California farmers have exhausted their 2002 water supplies and will tap deeper into drought-depleted Lake Mead,taking more water from the —Special report Colorado River as Arizona and other states take less. • A lontg_dry streak U.S. Interior Secretary Gale Norton authorized four agricultural districts to take an additional 260,000 acre-feet of water this year, about what Las Vegas uses annually. The water will come directly from Lake Mead, which sits at near-record lows. The California farm districts insist dry conditions left them no choice. Other Western leaders say the districts are trying to wring extra water from the river before California agrees to stricter limits in December. Arizona and the other five states that use the river told Norton they expect the farm districts to repay the water debt. In a letter to California Gov. Gray Davis,Norton imposed that condition and said if the farmers reneged, they would get no future help. California must prove by Dec. 31 that it has a plan to reduce its overuse of the Colorado River or face the loss of as much as 900,000 acre-feet of water next year, about what metropolitan Los Angeles uses annually. Find this article at: hftp://www.arizonarepublk.conVnews/anicieWl 127wate27.hMl r Check the box to include the list of links rehuenced in the ankle. 1 V COC1f NEIIE iO fNOV � http://arizonarepublic.printthis.clickability.conVpt/cpt?action=cpt&expire=&uriID=472161 t.. 12/3/2002 BOPRp Ldnkrr=l> � titC.CO�.nll'�t t J5[ "j5 covtA jL Policy Statement as of November 5, 2002 Public Policy Issues ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION POLICY OBJECTIVES: To keep Orange County business competitive on a state, national, and international basis while offering a healthful, safe environment to all segments of its population. POSITIONS: • Support regulations that are reliable, necessary to meet existing statutes and regulations, and sensitive to the parallel objectives of job creation and global competitiveness. • Support environmental regulations that are consistent and coordinated among governmental agencies and promote the elimination of those that are duplicative and conflicting (especially with respect to air pollution control measures and reporting, habitat conservation, water quality designations, and waste management). • Require environmental regulations to be based on sound scientific principles (including realistic risk assessments, accurate pollutant inventories, and acceptable environmental and economic models) and to produce measurable and achievable benefits to public health and the environment. • Promote development of improved methods and techniques for measuring, modeling, and assessing environmental impacts and the effectiveness of control measures including those related to air pollution control, Oer i usage, and urban runoff. • Encourage innovative, market-oriented regulations for meeting environmental standards such as emission reduction credit banking & trading, habitat conservation plans, and incentives for voluntary impact reductions. • Advocate cooperative efforts among the regulated community, the regulators, and other stakeholders toward consensus rulemaking and, if subsequent judicial or administrative review results in invalidation, provide for the original entities to participate in the process of correcting deficiencies. • Promote Air Quality Management Plan revisions with control measures that are cost-effective, feasible, and achievable within the specified timeframes. All identified mobile and stationary source strategies should be comparatively assessed including those limited by statue to state or federal regulation. Rev.d2-21-01 J:ILEGISLATUG 2003-2004ftllcy StetemenfslEnvironmental Reguletion.dac Policy Statement as of November 5, 2002 • Encourage efforts to evaluate and report the impacts of proposed and existing regulations upon housing, business, and the economy of Orange County. • Support California Environmental Quality Act reforms that curb abuses of the process. • Oppose local, state or federal actions (with specific regard to wetlands mitigation, urban runoff, endangered species critical habitat regulation, coastal land use) that would create unnecessary additional barriers to housing construction, infrastructure development, and other critical land uses. • Require environmental justice implementation processes to balance environmental effects with economic well-being so that the overall quality of life of the affected populations is not adversely impacted. • Require that efforts to address urban runoff and beach water closures include thorough assessments of all sources and of the cost-effectiveness of treatment options. Address funding of public infrastructure improvements, where public systems may be contributing to the problem. Include public education aimed toward preventing inappropriate disposal/discharge of pollutants. Evaluate water conservation/recycling programs for their potential to improve the situation. BACKGROUND: Reasonable protections for our environment are important for sustaining Orange County's high quality of life. However, burdensome and unfair regulations can jeopardize the very environment that promotes and finances essential services — the business climate. We need to strike a balance that ensures protection of our physical environment and our business climate. Excessive regulation, including an increasing number of local and regional government regulations, is detrimental to this goal. Furthermore, conflicting and overlapping requirements among local, state, and federal jurisdictions and across media (i.e., air, water, solid waste) can create inefficiencies that stifle job creation and divert business dollars away from developing products, investing for growth, and adding value to customers and shareholders. The high cost of environmental compliance could force some Orange County businesses to close or to relocate to an area with lower compliance costs. The Orange County Business Council believes environmental regulations should focus on areas posing the greatest demonstrated risk to human health and the environment, and that regulatory agencies and the business community should work as partners rather than as adversaries to develop solutions. The Council R,.,sed2-21-01 J:ILEGISLAnLAG 2007-20041P01icy StelemenlsLnvimnmental Regulafion.doc Policy Statement as of November 5, 2002 through its Regulatory, Infrastructure, and Legislative committees is committed to furthering this goal. Wherever possible, regulatory strategies should include market-oriented approaches and incentives to offer maximum compliance flexibility and cost- effectiveness. Identifying creative solutions that balance the goals of economic development with other worthwhile public policy objectives will protect our quality of life and ensure that Orange County's economy continues to thrive in this new millennium. Revised 2-21-01 J:UGISLATllAG 2003-2004Nolicy StatemenlslEnvimmantal Regulatlay.dw Policy Statement as of November 5,2002 OCEAN WATER QUALITY POLICY OBJECTIVES Improvements in ocean water quality as the result of a comprehensive, watershed-based, approach that will reduce contaminants from point and nonpoint sources in a cost effective manner. Legislative and regulatory policies must be based upon scientific evidence of effectiveness and should not disproportionately burden individual communities or businesses to economically reach water quality environmental standards. POSITIONS In addition to those Orange County Business Council positions as set forth regarding Environmental Issues, the Orange County Business Council supports the following reasonable and effective positions regarding Ocean Water Quality. • Ensure economic vitality and safety of our coastline cities by protecting against wastewater contamination,sewage leaks and other environmental impacts. • Encourage an informed,science-based dialogue about the potential impacts of when nmoff and storm water, so that solutions are based on objective assessment, not simply perceived problems. • Support improvement of water quality testing to more quickly and accurately determine levels of contamination, actual health risks and proper notification of the public. • Support funding to prioritize chronic storm drain systems so that dry weather nuisance flows are diverted into the sanitary sewer for treatment and disposal or reclamation. • Education of businesses, residents and visitors of the steps we can all take to reduce urban runoff and of the importance of improving water quality to the economy and overall quality of life in Orange County. • Improve the public's understanding of the relationship between designated"uses" and the cost to both the public and private sectors to make storm drains,creeks, flood control channels and other urban facilities"swimable"and"fishable." • Increase public awareness of the impacts of naturally occurring contaminants and pathogens that would be present even without any built environment or other human activities. • New high-tech, weather based, irrigation systems to only water when needed and to reduce excess urban runoff. • Advocate the integration of "natural treatment" systems that utilize constructed wetlands to help filter pesticides, urban runoff, and other potential contaminants where feasible and appropriate. Policy Statement as of November 5,2002 • Support the beneficial reuse of urban runoff through groundwater infiltration and water reclamation as well as promote regional,natural treatment solutions that can improve overall watershed health. • Implement and encourage structural 'Best Available Technologies" for existing residents and businesses, as well as new development,to treat urban runoff with dry weather urban runoff diversion systems, drought tolerant and native plants, water filters, screens,trash catchers,UV light devices,and more. • Revise basin plans developed over 20 years ago that inaccurately designate uses for inland and coastal water bodies in violation of the requirements of the Porter Cologne Act BACKGROUND As a nation, we have focused attention during the last three decades upon reduction of point sources of water pollution from industries and municipal sewage treatment plants. Today, public and media attention is directed at urban runoff as a major cause of ocean water contamination. Unfortunately, press reports have portrayed ocean water quality as declining when the reality may be that it is simply being measured regularly for the first time. The Orange County Business Council strongly supports improvement of ocean water quality through widespread public education and adoption of cost-effective public policies based upon sound research. We are deeply concerned, however, by a proliferation of litigation and regulation based upon outdated basin plans and the adoption of unattainable water quality"standards." Too often state and local government agencies attempt to address urban runoff issues by imposing very costly and inflexible requirements on new businesses and new development with very little attention paid to the very limited water quality benefits of such policies. We all have a role in improving ocean water quality, and it will take a watershed-wide effort by all of us to achieve meaningful improvements. The Orange County Business Council looks forward to playing an active role in improving ocean water quality and believes the proposed policies and positions listed above will move Orange County in that direction. L.6."Eex ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT November 20, 2002 phone: 0141 See-2411 Nancy Stoner telling address: NRDC Pour:vall,ix 1200 New York Avenue NW 92728-8127 Washington, DC 20005 LL"string MEtwn �10844 pile Avarua 4bun41nwlloy.CA SUBJECT: OCSD City and Agency Collection Facilities O&M Survey p ' 82708-7018 I'm pleased to furnish a copy of our latest report for your review and use. This edition is based on data from Fiscal Year 00/01. This report is a major ' Agencies component of our outreach efforts with our satellite cities and agencies. This • effort allows us to work closer with the satellites, especially on major issues ,:;;4..• cities such as implementing our new regional Waste Discharge Requirements r:ec r (WDR). The WDR is our local version of the EPA's proposed SSO Rule A eneim Prep cMOM". I'm also including a few recent news items on urban runoff and i a"°ciyreaa Perk beach postings as a result of our recent storms and some grease control Ly fit"ern valrey issues in nearby Laguna Beach. : .�Gartlen Grove p'Hunungmn Beath After you review the information, I'd be glad to discuss any issues of interest ene La P.Ore 414 W1thyOU. Le relme Las`c Beach NewpaK Beach .1.!:C.. /..hde Placanre ' Sere Are Baal Beach Nick Arhontes SYen[pn ann Manager of Collection Facilities O&M Ville Perk lerba Lind. and Facilities Services Divisions p...ty m or.... NJA:jmf SaG:\wp.dM\om\420%Montes\General\Transmittal to NRDC 11,02.doa enitery Districts Cct. Ms. c B. Anderson Midway ci R. Ooten Water Districts R. Ghirelli Irvine Ranch ~p " '~ 'To Protect the Public Heenh and[he Environment Mmugh Excellence in Was[swetsr Systems' National Qoe9 CST►, BIOSOUS Partnership rr. 21e a Z .1• v� p6tz.Te4 WMiap ro m,we eavbonmsele/exerlenn/a Drooalbt manapemem y management Commglee R0De1 W. dlKa ma eer.co T� Karen C.and.Pr.e.,P.F. WEE Aker VA Can elm ANSA.Wazmemn.N Were o.Ildmmmx,Pike.P.F. November 14, 2002 axsa CAN,am ,EPA,eenlea Blake Anderson US.EPA Adsxr ,ern n.walk.,.MD. General Manager U Scom Mmo, Orange County Sanitation District Stecasetearmig committee 10844 Ellis Avenue Ceg1Cha`��.Ii Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Hamel labor.M.D. Unbenly Park PA mill FEW, Dear Blake: wno Coomy.WA "°An `°o re' Re: National Biosolids Partnership Appeals Board Membership Th.Ends xummuru,ON At the September 30, 2002, meeting of the National Biosolids emUSd..EM Partnership's Management Committee, you were selected to serve as a Wa lflor,lVwr member of the NBP's Appeals Board. The purpose of this letter is to - Kobel 0'000 invite you to serve in this voluntary role. Hodson.0 A R.KRadio..NC The NBP Appeals Board was created to establish an independent Paul Error appeals process to provide EMS program participants the formal ability whishPnxx.FEW Po of to question an auditor's verification determination. The broad groups of Clxaoo.IL stakeholder participants developing the NBP core documents were Willi.. concerned about the possibility of inconsistent auditor performance and Gary G.use Ripar,Pr.O determinations. YaYovaood.CO ai6am."cc The size and composition of the Board (nine individuals-four from the pglmA giesolids wastewater/POTW category and one each from five of the several management Cammittme stakeholder groups—plus one alternate for each of the two categories) Robal P.oomineY represent a balance of biosolids community interests with sufficient to$ralc Cleveland.ON Na,mnd,.K-andy independence from the wastewater industry to maintain program Ca-Chair Los Adirs,CA credibility. WEF ResidWs g giasollds Committee A list of the invited Appeals Board members is attached. An Chair Rro'ocrecler�NY organizational meeting is planned during the first half of 2003. Other Flood!Crmry meetings would be scheduled on the basis of need. Travel support will Woe-Chay.Nor,istom.PA be made available as necessary. Terms of service, the appeals process and schedule, and likely meeting dates will be furnished. all Wyl Dear Kobe la VA W14-IM 703,684-241 e ban 7M84-2n92(lu) please visit our webase at:www.biosoll0s.orp blo.olid n(199%solid organic matter recovered from waste Water treatment process and used,esp.as fertilizer—Usually in pl. want to thank you in advance for your willingness to serve and to help further the Partnership's efforts to improve the effectiveness of biosolids management programs. By your acceptance, you will be part of the nationwide program to ensure protection of public health, improve communications between wastewater treatment agencies and the public, and increase confidence in biosolids management practices. Please respond to Gene DeMichele (edemichele(ebwef.org) at your earliest convenience. I hope you are in a position to accept this appointment. Sincerely, 6r� AVt- Robert W. Hite Chair, National Biosolids Partnership Attachments Audit Appeals Board Selected Candidate Board Members Wastewater/POTW category (4): Kumar Kishinchand, Philadelphia Water Department Blake Anderson, Orange County (CA) Sanitation District Gordon Garner, Louisville-Jefferson County (retired) Richard Lanyon, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Alternate; Gumie Gunter, Kansas City Water Service Department Other Stakeholder Groups (5): Ed Pinero, Private EMS Consultant Jason Morrison, Pacific Research Institute Paul Schur, University of Connecticut Nancy Girard, Conservation Law Foundation Greg Kester, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Alternate; Mark Lang, SearBrown Group W tiN n ii E 0 m a l W + CALIFORNIA WATER U � ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATION P O O Ik.. �51 9 � n 9 O p. G c m 9gryq RIVER BAS�Ns� 17• Professional Development Committee presents 5. I BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT _ \ n Wednesday, January 15 — Thursday, January 16, 2003 At the Sheraton Anaheim Hotel 900 South Disneyland Drive Anaheim, California 92802-1844 714-778-1700 www.sheratonanaheim.com — N1 Mark Your Calendar And Make Your Reservation—Now h AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING December 18, 2002—7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 12/18/02 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager 1. 30/30 Monthly Update G. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the regular meeting held on November 20, 2002 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 11/15/02 11/30/02 Totals $5,717,575.79 $11,653,873.10 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director or staff member, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-21,Adopting the DistricPs 2002 Conflict of Interest Code, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 00-21. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 12/18/02 Page 3 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re December 20, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 20, 2002, to be filed. C. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the December 18, 2002 meeting. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re the December 4, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 4, 2002 to be filed. C. Receive and file Microfiltration Demonstration Project Report, Phase I, prepared by Carollo Engineers, dated December 2002. d. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 101322 issued to U.S. Peroxide for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. C-2002-90, for an additional amount of$600,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,426,036 for the contract period ending June 30, 2003. e. Authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to PixelPushers, Inc. for Online Technical Specification Reference Library, Specification No. M-2002-100R, to provide for software and implementation services, in an amount not to exceed $186,470 plus tax. f. Receive and file External Inspection of 120" and 78"Ocean Outfalls Report, prepared by Undersea Graphics, Inc. dated January 2002. g. (1) Receive and file Asset Management Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis prepared by Parsons Infrastructure and Technology, Inc., dated November 2002; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate a contract amendment with Parson's Infrastructure and Technology, Inc. for the Asset Management Program, Phase 2, to be awarded by the Board of Directors at a future meeting. 12/18/02 Page 4 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re the December 5, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 5, 2002 to be filed. C. Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$356,059 and an extension of 82 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $70,846,009. d. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 12 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing a deduction of$5,182, decreasing the total contract amount to$10,911,147; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 13 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities, authorizing a decrease of$4,000, decreasing the total contract amount to $10,907,147; and, (3)Accept Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N. and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer- Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, with Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc., authorizing an addition of$24,730, increasing the total contract amount to $650,100; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities, authorizing an increase of$49,400, increasing the total contract amount to $699,500; and, (3)Accept Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. f. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project, Job No. J-39, with Connolly-Pacific Inc., authorizing a $10,000 credit, decreasing the total contract amount to $4,863,000; and, (2) Accept Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project, Job No. J-39, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. 12/18/02 Page 5 g. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$44,314 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, for a total budget of$2.055,387; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $48,114 and a time extension of 28 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,459,187; and, (3) Accept Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. h. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for the Trunk Sewer Mapping Project, Contract No. 1-98, providing for additional mapping services for an amount of$163,126, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,353,391. I. Approve Addendum No. 11 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of $186,977, increasing the total amount not to exceed $9,655,793. j. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for design of Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount not to exceed $2,600,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed$15,877,372. k. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$500,000 for Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, for a total budget of$7,930,000; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black S Veatch Corporation for Short-Tenn Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, providing for additional engineering services in an amount of$450,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $897,920; (3)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the plans and specifications; (4) Receive and file letter dated November 27, 2002 from SS Mechanical Corporation, apparent low bidder, requesting to be relieved from their bid due to a mathematical error, (5) Approve the request of SS Mechanical Corporation to be relieved from their bid; (6) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (7)Award a construction contract to J. F. SHEA Construction, Inc. for Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, for an amount not to exceed $4,298,247. 12/18/02 Page 6 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the December 11, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 11, 2002 to be filed. (Minutes to be distributed at 12/18/02 Board Meeting.) C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2002. d. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD-22,Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for adoption of Policy No. E90.00, Internet and Electronic Mail Usage. e. Approve a change order to the purchase order contract to appoint Moreland & Associates as the District's independent auditors for fiscal year 2002-03 in an annual amount not to exceed $47,800, and not to exceed $49,700 for fiscal year 2003-04. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee re December 9, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 12, 2002 to be filed. 16. Authorize the General Manager to execute a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company at no cost to build and maintain an electrical substation and transmission line near the intersection of Garfield Street(Ward Avenue, in the city of Fountain Valley, in connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, in a form approved by General Counsel. 17. Consideration of the following actions regarding environmental documentation required to modify the certified 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report: a. Receive and file Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, and the Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program, November 2000, prepared by Environmental Science Associates; and, _1 12/18/02 Page 7 b. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD02-23, Making Certain Findings Relating to Significant Environmental Effects identified in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for implementation of the Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, and Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program; Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Supplementing the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR; Certifying the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, and Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program; and authorizing the Filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. 18. a. Approve Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide reimbursement to the District of costs estimated at $969,000, and to provide for additional engineering services at no cost, for correction of a design error for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2; b. Approve plans and specifications for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; C. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; d. Receive and file Bid Tabulation and Recommendation; and, a. Award a construction contract to Cora Constructors for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, for an amount not to exceed $738,000. 19. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re pending matter of litigation, Orange County Sanitation District, at al. v. County of Kern, at al., Tulare County Superior Court Case No. 189564. (Government Code Section 54956.9) 12/18/02 i Page 8 b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 22. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for January 22, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. 23. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 Director of Finance Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 Director of Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 Director of Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 Director of Operations & Maintenance Bob Ooten (714) 593-7020 Director of Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714) 593-7400 Director of Information Technology Patrick Miles (714) 593-7280 Assistant to General Manager Greg Mathews (714) 593-7104 General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff (714) 564-2605 (-------------—---------------------------- ----------------------- G:\wp.dte\agenda\Board Agendas\2002 Board Agendas\121802 agenda.doc i Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 2002 �OJN� SANITgT�oy Q A ¢ ea HE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 i Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 ' 11/20/02 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on November 20, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken, Chair Tom Daly X Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Steve Simonian A Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy X Don Bankhead Jan Flory A Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Laurann Cook Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue David Shawver X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer John M. Gullixson X Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt A Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley X Beth Krom Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson vacant X Richard A. Frescht X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams Jerry Sigler X Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith Paul Walker X I Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Mike Moore; Jim Colston; Jeff Reed OTHERS PRESENT:Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Russ Patterson; Randy Fuhrman; Don Hughes; Irwin Haydoctc; Dennis Baker, Larry Porter; Jan Vandersloot; Joan Irvine Smith; Eileen Murphy; Don Slaven; Julie Bendzick-Sin; Greg Jewell; Robin Rustan; Paul Mosley; Garry Brown; Terry Leu; Judith M. Gielow Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 11/20/02 PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons expressed support for the District's submittal of an ocean discharge permit application for secondary treatment standards on all wastewater discharged into the ocean: Jan Vandersloot;Joan Irvine Smith; Randy Fuhrman; Greg Jewell; Robin Rustan; Eileen Murphy; Garry Brown; Larry Porter; Dennis Baker. Joan Irvine Smith expressed opposition to the District's disinfection program. In addition, Randy Fuhrman referred to his letter that was distributed to Directors that evening which listed his concerns on various items they would be considering for action. Director Norm Eckenrode stated he had collected pictures of the majority of former chairs of the Sanitation District and requested that the pictures be permanently displayed at the District. RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to Assemblyman Bill Maddox for his contribution, efforts and support of AB 1969 which allows the District to proceed towards secondary treatment standards without the possibility of mandatory penalties of over$1 million per year. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Russ Patterson for his contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Laurann Cook for her contribution and dedication to public service upon her retirement from the District. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Pat McGuigan for her contribution and dedication to public service upon her retirement from the District. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director John Gullixson for his contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Jerry Sigler for his contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair McCracken announced that Director Brian Donahue was appointed Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, and Director Jim Ferryman was appointed Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee. She also announced that the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff meeting scheduled for November 21' had been cancelled. The OMTS and PDC committees will be dark in January. The FAHR committee will meet on January Vh in closed session on meet and confer issues. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 ' 11/20/02 REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, gave an update on the progress of meeting the 30/30 treatment levels, and referred the Directors to the monthly report in their meeting folders. Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, gave a brief overview on the process of developing the District's Capital Improvement Program validation process with regard to meeting the construction needs to achieve 30/30 treatment levels. The program will include 150 projects with an estimated budget of approximately$1.8 billion. It is anticipated that the validated Capital Improvement Program will be presented to the Board of Directors in March 2003. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff reported on a recent meeting between EPA and the local environmental groups which District staff attended. The environmental group requested they be kept informed throughout the scheduled permit review process. It was also reported that EPA's policy requires negotiations to be kept confidential. After terms of the permit have been negotiated, there will be a public comment period prior to the issuance of the permit. Mr. Woodruff also reported the Steering Committee discussed Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority's (SAWPA) unpaid invoices from the District, and gave direction to the District's representatives on or to the SARI Protection/Relocation Joint Management Committee to hopefully resolve the issue. In response to Directors'questions, the General Manager stated that the possible purchase by SAWPA of the SARI line and the monies due to the District are two separate issues. It was also clarified that SAWPA has the funds to pay for the use of the SARI line and engineering services for the relocation of the line, but maintains that it does not have the funds for construction improvements. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held October 23, 2002 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/02 10/31/02 Totals $5,340,853.52 $11,897,884.25 Director Mark Leyes abstained. Director Alice Jempsa abstained on Warrant Nos. 47899 and 48023. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 11/20/02 CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Emilio Ariston v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 02CC16686, regarding Complaint for Damages Arising from National Origin and/or Race Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the November 7 and November 20, 2002 meetings. Chair McCracken stated the General Manager provided reports to the committee on the California legislative agenda for 2003; a new handbook for Directors on committee charters and the Directors' duties; 30/30 secondary treatment standards, biosolids management and disinfection; and the future of the Communications Division. Additional items were presented by the staff and discussed by the committee: • 2003 Committee meeting schedule was reviewed. It was determined that the OMTS and PDC Committees will be dark in January and August. Because of labor negotiations, the FAHR Committee will meet In January and be dark in August. • A workshop for new and returning Directors has been scheduled for February 19, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. The FAHR Committee meeting was also scheduled to meet on the same date at 5:00, due to the February 120 holiday. • Discussion of low Interest loans for residents to convert from septic tanks to sewer connections was moved to the December 18, 2002 meeting. • Unpaid invoices by SAWPA were discussed. Documentation has been compiled by staff and General Counsel, detailing the numerous meetings, letters, memos, faxes, e-mails and invoices relating to the Issue,which must be resolved with SAWPA before staff undertakes any additional work. The Issue will be the subject of the next meeting of the SARI Joint Management Committee with SAWPA. • The District's Washington, DC lobbyists, Eric Saperstein and John Freshman, attended a special meeting of the Steering Committee held on November 76, to review the legislative advocacy plan. The lobbyists advised the Committee they had been successful in placing language in EPA's appropriations bill that should assist the District in its permit negotiations with EPA. They outlined a strategy for pursuing federal grant funding to help pay the costs for attaining secondary treatment standards, and they believe the District has a good chance to obtain federal funds If the District is willing to pursue the funds. Staff was directed to prepare an agenda report for the following month establishing a budget for calendar year 2003, covering fiscal years 02103 and 03/04 recommending a contract for professional advocacy services that would result in the development of a short-tens strategy for securing grant funding and include an estimate of the amount of grant assistance available. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 11/20/02 The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meetings held on October 23, 2002 and November 7, 2002 to be filed. C. Federal Legislative Advocacy Efforts (1) Establish a budget of$200,000 for federal legislative advocacy; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a Consultant Services Agreement with ENS Resources, Inc. for a one year period, effective January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, providing for professional advocacy services for a total amount not to exceed $180,000, in a form approved by General Counsel. Directors requested the status of the report requested on legislative advocacy efforts. Chair McCracken noted a draft report had been distributed at the Steering Committee that evening. At the Chair's request, copies of the report were provided to the Directors. In response to Directors' concerns regarding contract costs,the General Manager reported that although the agreement is for a one-year period, it is a month-to-month retainer with the ability to discontinue at any time if the District chooses to do so. He also advised the Steering Committee would be provided With updates on a regular basis. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Establish a budget of$200,000 for federal legislative advocacy; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a Consultant Services Agreement with ENS Resources, Inc. for a one year period, effective January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, providing for professional advocacy services for a total amount not to exceed $180,000, in a form approved by General Counsel. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the November 6, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 6, 2002 to be fled. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Change Order No. 3 to the contract with Kemiron Pacific, Inc. for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-147, in the amount of$500,000, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $3,035,000,for the period ending November 30, 2002; and, (2) Renew the contract with Kemiron Pacific, Inc., for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-147,for a one-year period, December 1, 2002 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 11/20/02 through November 30, 2003, providing for an additional unit rate increase of$97 per dry ton, Increasing the total unit price to$426.69, including sales tax and delivery,for an estimated annual amount of$5,120,280. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Management of Biosolids with Tule Ranch/Magan Farms, extending the contract term for one year, January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, with four additional one-year options,for an annual amount not to exceed $3,804,000. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve use of Sancon 100 and Sancon 200 Series polyurethane coatings as the District's standard spray-on coating material for manhole and pump station wetwell repairs and rehabilitation; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source Services Agreement with Sancon Engineering II, Inc.,to provide coating and application services of Sancon 100 and Sancon 200 Series on an on-call basis for one year, with four one-year renewable options,for an annual amount not to exceed $300,000. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Donahue, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the November 7, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 7, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$98,576 for Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25, for a total budget of$1,682,667; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25,with Elser Constructors, Inc., authorizing an addition of $94,956 and a time extension of 17 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,279,146; (3) Ratify Change Order No. 3 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities, authorizing an increase of$2,346, increasing the total contract amount to $1,281,492; and, (4)Accept Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-25, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$587,216 for Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job No. J-71-7, for a total budget of$3,319,216; Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 11/20/02 (2) Ratify Change Order Nos. 2 and 3 to Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job No. J-71-7, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$651,210 and a time extension of 20 calendar days, Increasing the total contract amount to $1,905,779; and, (3) Accept Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job No. J-71-7, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pimie, Inc. for preparation of emission reduction study assessment in connection with Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79, for an amount not to exceed $253,235. Director Mark Leyes abstained. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve budget reallocation of $2,645,000 for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, with no change In total project budget; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. P1-76, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and, (3)Authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers, Job No. 131-76. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc., for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, providing for changes in the Scope of Work for an additional amount of$140,667, for a total amount not to exceed $3,411,411. Director Mark Leyes abstained. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Final Interim Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J-40-8, dated September 2002, prepared by Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black &Veatch Corporation for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, providing for additional design engineering services for an additional amount of$304,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $4,015,523. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to negotiate Addendum No. 3 with Fluor Signature Services for Phase III of the Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84, providing for a detailed engineering design and preparation of plans and specifications. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 11/20/02 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Moore, Vice Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the November 13, 2002 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 13, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 2002. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2002 through September 30, 2002. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve SAFETY-POL 304, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the 2002-03 First Quarter Financial Report for the period ending September 30, 2002. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and approve the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR)for the year ended June 30, 2002, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt a revised per diem policy for authorized training and travel providing for daily limits approved by the IRS for various locations in the United States. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amended and Restated Agreement re: Additional Retiree Benefit Account with the Orange County Employees Retirement System, providing for segregation of a portion of the ARBA funds to a trust fund for the benefit of current and future retirees, in a form approved by General Counsel. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the books and accounts of Revenue Area 7 be combined with those of the rest of the Orange County Sanitation District, except for Revenue Area 14, and that future revenues, expenses and capital outlays be considered those of the consolidated Orange County Sanitation District effective July 1, 2003. Director Mark Leyes opposed. k. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve the reclassification of eight District employees and nine positions. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 10 11/20/02 15. DRAFT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair of the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on November 12, 2002. Director Eckenrode reported a formal signing of the Joint Operating Agreement was held on November 12, 2002, and that construction is scheduled to begin on the GWRS system within 60 days. It is hoped that within four years the project will provide enough water for 800,000 residents. The Chair ordered the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 14, 2002 to be filed. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of 36" Force Main B, between Bitterpoint Pump Station and Junction Box, Contract No. 5-29-R1; (2)Approve Addendum No. i to the plans and specifications; (3) Declare the low bid submitted by Colich Construction, L.P., as non-responsive due to failure to provide complete submittals required; (4) Declare the second low bid submitted by Doty Brothers Equipment Co., as non-responsive due to failure to provide complete submittals required; (5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and, (6)Award a contract to Insituform Technologies, Inc., for Rehabilitation of 36" Force Main B, between Bitterpoint Pump Station and Junction Box, Contract No. 5-29-R1,for an amount not to exceed $1,552,470. 17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Authorize the General Manager to submit the Ocean Discharge Permit Application to the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, consistent with Resolution No. OCSD 02-14, Establishing the Policy for Level of Treatment of Wastewater Discharged into the Ocean. 18. There was no closed session. 19. Director Eckenrode requested the District's contract with Scott Baugh be placed on the agenda the following month for discussion. 20. Alternate Director Mike Duvall reported that Don Fox, a former Director and Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District had recently undergone a lung transplant and was recovering at his residence in Brea. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 11 11/20/02 ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:38 p.m. Secretary of te Board of D' ctors of Orange County Sanitation District G:\wp.dta\admin%BS\MInutes\092502 draft minutes.dou Claims Paid From 10/01102 to 10115/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 47607 Orange County Sanitation District $ 528.799.51 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 47608 Southern California Edison 08,416.91 Power 47609 Sunset Beach Sanitary District 61262.38 - Construction-J-73 Cooperative Projects Program 47610 Systima Computer Corp. 40200.00 Professional Services-JD Edwards One-World XE Implementation 47611 Airgas Safety 693.79 Safety Supplies&Equipment 47612 AT&T Universal Biller 2.795.65 Telephone Service 47613 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 265.49 Telephone Service 47614 AW WA 925.00 Lab Meeting Registration 47615 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 47616 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 47617 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 250.87 Electrical Supplies 47618 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 12.41 Plumbing Supplies 47619 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 37.23 Paint Supplies 47620 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 8.321.31 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 47621 Court Order 526.00 Wage Garnishment 47622 City of Fullerton 449.43 Water Use 47623 Gerard Daniel Worldwide 122.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47624 City of Huntington Beach 33.56 Water Use 47625 Ind. Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3260.67 Dues Deduction 47626 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1.426.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47627 National Bond&Trust 1.166.65 U.S.Savings Bonds 47628 Orange County CoastKeeper 1,000.00 Sponsorship-2002 Coastal Preservation Recognition Dinner 47629 Orange County Sheriff 45.00 Wage Garnishment 47630 OCEA 515.36 Dues Deduction 47631 Pacific Bell 1.194.26 Telephone Services 47632 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 47633 Court Order 296.00 Wage Gamishment 47634 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,080.00 Dues Deduction 47635 PDSA,Inc. 499.00 Information Technology Training Registration 47636 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 549A1 Instrument Supplies 47637 Radius Maps 275.00 Radius Map&Ownership Listings 47638 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 285.26 Paint Supplies 47639 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 114.41 Tools 47640 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 47641 Summit Steel 24425 Metal 47642 Sunset Industrial Parts 100.19 Hose Repair 47643 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,711.94 Mechanical Supplies 47644 The Unisoume Corporation 7026 Office Supplies 47645 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 47646 Verizon California 1,329.63 Telephone Services 47647 Frank Chavez 411.61 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47648 Jean E.Tappan 142.68 Meetingfrmining Expense Reimbursement 47649 Carolyn L.Thompson 126.07 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47650 Sonja A.Wassgren 867.72 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 10/01/02 to 10115102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47651 Boyd,Mark 1,955.94 Employee Computer Loan Program 47652 Colston,Jim 1,382.83 Employee Computer Loan Program 47663 Handy,Roy&Dell Computer Corporation 2.250.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 47654 Losurdo,Linda 2.327.40 Employee Computer Loan Program 47655 Stuht,Mike d CompUSA 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 47656 UC Regents 95.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 47657 Veboah,Purest 2,078.10 Employee Computer Loan Program 47658 A-Plus Systems 1.220.00 Notices&Ads 47659 Abatix Environmental Corp. 220.80 Hardware 47660 ABEL Pumps Corp. 601.43 Pump Supplies 47661 Air Liquids America Corp. 171.08 Specialty Gasses 47662 Airborne Express 7423 Air Freight 47663 Areas-West 10.23 Lab Parts&Supplies 47664 Airgas Safety 529.28 Safety Supplies 47665 American Airlines 4,656.00 Travel Services 47666 American Eagle System, Inc. 3,193.35 Computer Hardware/Software Supplies 47667 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 440.00 Lab Parts It Supplies 47668 Aquarium Doctor 146.94 Aquarium Services 47669 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,In. 1,870.00 Toxicity Testing 47670 Amcor Vac Sweeping Service 960.00 Vacuum Truck Services 47671 Ashtead Technology Rentals 23.25 Equipment Lease 47672 ABantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 47673 Autodesk Univers0y/Enterprise Events 1,245.00 Engineering Meeting Registration 47674 APWA 85.00 Information Technology Training Registration 47675 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 36.17 Telephone Service 47676 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,514A3 Cellular Telephone Service 47677 Baker Tanks 5,762.89 Tank Rentals 47678 Basic Chemical Solutions 17,275.77 Bleach 47679 Berendsen Fluid Power 92A7 Mechanical Supplies 47680 Biocycle 69.00 Subscription 47681 Boot Barn 129.29 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 47682 Brinderson Corporation 11,186.00 Professional Services P7-95 47683 Brown&Caldwell 18,814.29 Engineering Services J-25-6 47684 California Automatic Gate 1,059.45 Service Agreement 47685 Martin Boyer Co.,Inc.Go Cambridge int. 6,249.99 Workers Compensation Claims 47686 Carollo Engineers 23.290.49 Professional Services P2-60,J-87&SP-90 47687 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 9.418.78 Professional Services-Anaerobic Selector Study 47688 Ce112CB11 1.055.72 Communication Equipment 47689 Charles P.Crowley Co. 8.278.83 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47690 Communications Supply Corp. 182.32 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47691 The Complete Line,L.L.C. 383.90 Stationery&Office Supplies 47692 Comex International,Inc. 3.140.00 Professional Services P2-60 47693 Consent Decree Library 21.00 Publication 47694 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 12,276.97 Electrical Supplies 47695 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 5.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 2 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 10/01102 to 10115/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47696 Cooper Energy Services 027.44 Engine Supplies 47697 Coordinated Wire Rope&Rigging 538.33 Wire Rope 47698 Corporate Express Imaging 486.39 Computer Supplies 47699 Corporate Express 3,104.94 Office Supplies 47700 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 126.89 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47701 County Wholesale Electric Co. 892.12 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47702 Cytec Industries 16,373.40 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9796A8 47703 CEM Corporation 1,869.43 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 47704 CEPA Company 1,450.00 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 47705 CH2M Hill 16,580.30 Professional Service J-40-6 47706 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 5.175.00 Lab Analysis 47707 CWEA 120.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 47708 CWEA Membership 92.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 47709 Dapper-fire Co. 1,D49.77 Truck Tires 47710 David's Tree Service 6,275.00 Tree Maim.Service 47711 De Guelle Glass Co., Inc. 131.55 Safety Glass 47712 Del MarAnalygcal 13.026.00 Blosolids Analysis 47713 Diamond H Recognition 376.90 Employee Service Awards 47714 DigiPhoto 10.95 Photographic Services 47715 Malcom 3,555.75 Client Access Software License-IBM AS400 47716 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 672.20 Paint Supplies 47717 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 214.97 Electrical Supplies 47718 Ecology Control Industries 9.632.83 Hazardous Waste Disposal 47719 Employers Group Service Corp. 4.400.00 Human Resources Training Registration 47720 Enchanter,Inc. 3.600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 47721 Environmental Resource Association 3,495.13 Lab Parts&Supplies 47722 Environmental Systems Research Inst. 10,667.25 Software License-ESRI Arch-do 47723 ENRG 68.93 Operational&Maintenance Services-Compressed Natural Gas Stations 47724 ENS Resources,Inc. 4.000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 47725 FeclEx Corporation 118.09 Air Freight 47726 First American Real Estate Solutions 425.94 Orange County Property Information 47727 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 5,143.40 Lab Parts&Supplies 47728 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 270.00 Concrete Cutting 47729 Fountain Valley Camera 16.32 Photo Supplies 47730 Franklin Covey 288.12 Office Supplies 47731 Frys Electronics 1,53720 Computer Supplies 47732 Full Spectrum Analytics 70023 Instrument Repairs 47733 GE Supply 6,297.78 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47734 Ganahl Lumber Company 508.66 Lumber/Hardware 47735 George Yardley Co. 43.10 Electrical Supplies 47736 Government Finance Officers Association 105.00 Subscription 47737 WIN Grainger,Inc. 2,862.75 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47738 Graphic Distributors 461.17 Photographic Supplies 47739 Graybar 1.760.06 Computer Hardware/Software Supplies 47740 Hall&Associates 19,603.64 Legal Services-NPDES Permit Pace 3 of 10 FxHIRIT n Claims Paid From 10/01102 to 10115102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47741 Harald Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 47742 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 301.65 Engine Generator Control Supplies 47743 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 47.25 Meeting Expenses 47744 Hilt,Inc. 441.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47745 Home Depot 25.55 Small Hardware 47745 Hopkins Technical Products 13,085.70 Pump&Pump Supplies 47747 Hub Auto Supply 150.07 Automo0ve Supplies 47748 HI Standard Automotive 219.81 Automotive Supplies 47749 Idexx 6,012A6 Lab Parts&Supplies 47750 Imaging Express 1,662.74 Printer Maintenance 47751 Imaging Plus,Inc. 2,566.39 Printing Service 47752 Industrial Distribution Group 2,806.74 Mechanics]Parts&Supplies 47753 Industrial Metal Supply 670.05 Metal 47754 Information Resources 890.00 Human Resources Service 47755 Rota Rooter 4,805.00 -CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 47756 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 225.68 Lab Supplies 47757 Intretek Computer,Inc. 1,560.00 Network&Server Maintenance 47758 Invensys Systems,Inc. 3,342.4E Instrument Supplies 47769 J&B Auto Parts 76425 Auto Parts&Supplies 47760 Jays Catering 4,369.51 Meeting Expenses 47761 Johnstone Supply 620.55 Instrument Parts&Supplies 47762 J2 Printing Services 893.33 Printing 47763 Kensington Electronics 137.27 Electrical Supplies 47764 Lascomm 1,863.78 Computer Software/Hardware 47765 Linler Company c/o Gerald Jones 400.90 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 47766 Los Angeles County 1,038.50 Sewer Service Conn.Agreement MO 9/23198 47767 Lucci's 304.60 Meeting Expense 4776E M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 17,852.98 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 47769 Manleys Boiler,Inc. 10,680.00 Boiler Repair 47770 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 862.83 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47771 Mechanics[Seal Repair, Inc. 2,720.69 Mechanical Seal 47772 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 955.00 Mechanical Repairs 47773 Mission Unfform Service 4,357.86 Uniform Rentals 47774 Moreland&Associates 7,156.60 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 47775 Motion Industries 1,331.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47776 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyworks 920.51 Vehicle Painting 47777 MSC Applied Environmental Sciences 1,420.00 Lab Analyses 47778 National Plant Services, Inc. 13,355.00 Vacuum Truck Services 47779 Neal Supply Co. 76.75 Plumbing Supplies 47780 Network Catalyst,Inc. 7,067.24 Computer Software/Hardware 47781 Newark Electronics 3.491.00 Elechical Parts&Supplies 47762 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 439.11 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 47783 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 2.253.90 Steel Tags 47784 NCG Porter Novelli,Inc. 151.98 Professional Services-Public Relations 47785 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,041.58 Office Supplies Page 4 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 10101102 to 10/15102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47786 Omega Industrial Supply,Inc. 192.15 Janitorial Supplies 47787 OmSourca Distributors,Inc. 34.54 Eleotncel Pans&Supplies 47788 Optlo Software,Inc. 5,335.00 Software License-Opdo Fax Server 47789 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment,Inc. 1,361.75 Fuel Pump Equipment 47790 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 207.11 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47791 Oxygen Service Company 1,671.17 Specialty Gases 47792 OCE-USA,Inc. 602.00 Scanner/Ploder Maintenance 47793 Pace Analytic Services 250.00 Lab Analyses of Wastewater&Biosolids 47794 Pacific Bell 17.64 Telephone Services 47795 Pacific Health&Safety Consulting,Inc. 1.817.70 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene Survey for Lab Acid Gases 47796 RH Phillips Co. 695.00 Notices&Ads 47797 Pack Mechanical Supply 3,396.81 Plumbing Supplies 47798 Pacific Parts&Controls 3,901.00 Electrical Supplies&Parts 47799 Voided Check - 47800 Parkhouse Tire Co. 164.03 Time 47801 Parts Unlimited 643.90 Truck Supplies 47802 Perna Pure,Inc. 218.47 Filter 47803 Pon Supply 205.07 Foul Weather Gear 47804 Power Bros.Machine,Inc. 1,256.50 Mechanical Repairs 47805 Primary Source 8,237A2 Office Furniture 47806 Not Management Group,Inc. 65728 Printing Services 47807 Projects Partners 17,036.31 Temporary Employment Services 47808 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 733.30 Pumps 47809 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service 47810 R.W.Beck 8,676.54 Professional Services P7-90 47811 R.L.Abbott&Associates 3.000.00 Kam County eiosolids Consulting Services 47812 Red Wing Shoes 200.85 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 47813 Regents of Univ.of California 20.62 Professional Services J-35 47814 Refastar 8,953.00 Employee Basic Life Insurance Premium 47815 Rockhumt College Continuing Education 852.81 Accounting Training Registration 47816 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 451.87 Plumbing Supplies 47817 RJN Group,Inc. 9,697.50 Sofhvam Maintenance-CMMS 47818 Safety-Kleen 497.20 Service Agreement-Parts Cleaning,Fluids Removal&Installation 47819 San Diego Gas&Electric 390.00 O&M Training Registration 47820 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 4.860.00 Construction-Manhole Rehabilitation&Concrete Surfaces Repair 47821 Sawing Amenca,Inc. 2,845.96 Pump Supplies 47822 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 5,374.51 Specialty Gases 47823 Seen Name Plate Corp 82.26 Bamcade Tape 47824 Shepherd Machinery Co. 1,114.50 Truck Supplies 47825 ShImadzu Scientific Instruments,Inc. 491.29 Lab Parts&Supplies 47826 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 598.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47827 Supelce,Inc. 135.42 Lab Parts&Supplies 47828 Smflh-Emery Company 2.570.00 Professional Services Pi-37&7-41 47829 Sof flew Computer Products 1,277.66 Office Supplies 47830 SoftCholc9 13,977.42 Software Page 5 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 10/01/02 to 1011SM2 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47831 South Coast Air Ouality Management Dist. 270.89 Permit Fees-Annual Emission,Operation&Misc. Fees 47832 South Coast Environmental Co. 2,38059 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 47833 Southern California Edison 8,929.73 Power 47834 Spex Certiprep,Inc. 277.94 Lab Parts&Supplies 47835 State Board of Equalization 223.80 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 47836 Summit Steel 156.22 Metal 47837 Sunset Ford 139.00 Automotive Parts&Service 47838 Sunset Industrial Parts 235.64 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47839 Symcas-TSG 1,384.18 SCADA System Maintenance Agreement 47540 SAWPA 3,000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 47841 Terminix International Co. 1.680.00 Pest Control 47842 Tetra Tech,Inc. 10,478.00 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 47843 Thermo Elemental 11,791.00 Lab Equipment Software Agreement 47844 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 198.00 Biosolids Analysis 47845 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,88524 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47846 ThyssenKropp Elevator 1.280.00 Elevator Maintenance 47847 Time Warner Communication 40A7 Cable Services 47848 Todd Anderson 5,250.00 Professional Services J-85 47849 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 13,109.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 6-11-94 47850 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 26721 Automotive Supplies 47851 Tru"clail Laboratories,Inc. 2.010.00 Lab Services 47852 U.S.Metre Group,Inc. 24,786.00 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 47853 United Parcel Service 1,068.70 Parcel Services 47854 Defense Finance and Accounting 3,431.66 Professional Services J-85 47855 Venzon California 60.84 Telephone Services 47856 Veme's Plumbing 5.2,W.41 Service Contract-Rebcation of Back0ow Device 47857 Village Nurseries 264.49 Landscaping Supplies 47856 Vision Service Plan 7.557.12 Vision Service Premium 47859 Vortex Industries,Inc. 267.00 Door Repair 47860 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 4.289.94 Lab Parts&Supplies 47861 The Wackenhut Corporation 18,617.48 Security Guards 47862 Walden&Associates 4,010.05 Professional Services-Big Canyon Trunk Sewer 47863 Wally Machinery and Tool Supply,Inc. 542.35 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47864 Waste Markets Corp. 23,876.92 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Marl.Removal 47865 Water Systems Cleaning Co. 1,465.00 Cleaning Services-Pit.1 Fume Scrubber No.9 47866 WEF 896.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 47867 Xerox Corporation 15.611.99 Fax&Copier Leases 47868 Yellowstone Technologies, Inc. 5,500.00 Financial Information System Software Upgrade/Implementation 47869 Zee Medical 796.16 Safety Supplies 47870 Margate Construction,Inc. 8,D45.00 Construction P2-85-1 47871 Jennifer M.Cabral 566.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47872 John B.Falkenstein 409.96 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47873 David P.Halverson 613.50 MeeBng/Treining Expense Reimbursement 47874 Deirdre E.Hunter 195.77 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47875 Brian K Read 315.88 Mee9ng(rraining Expense Reimbursement Page 6 of10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid Fran 10101102 to 10115102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47876 Mary Polo S.Velasco 439.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47877 Monts C.Yng 411.02 MeatingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 47878 A&G Electropolish 165.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47879 Acrobun,Inc. 3.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47880 Air Industries Corporation 3.481.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47881 All Metal Paint Stripping,Inc. 2,913.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47882 Allied Pacific Metal Stamping 319.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47883 Alloy Die casting 845.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47884 Alloy Tech Electropolishing Intl. 30.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47885 Alhek Clrcuft,Inc. 634.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47886 Alpha Beta Markets 15.330.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program(Subsequently Voided) 47887 Aluminum Precision 1,515.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47888 Amcor-Sunclipse,Inc. 3,560.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47889 Amerimax Building Products,Inc. 485.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47890 Anaheim Extrusion Co., Inc. 1.106.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47891 Aqua-Con 606.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47892 Arrowhead Products 2.577.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47893 Auto-Chior System of Washington, Inc. 589.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47894 APW Enclosure Systems 3.642.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47895 APW Enclosure Systems,L.L.C. 3,895.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47896 Basic Electronics,Inc. 479.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47897 Boa Houston Co. 2.364.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47898 Beckman Coulter, Inc. 19,882A3 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47899 Boeing 11.099.58 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47900 Bridgemark Corporation 82.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47901 Bristol Industries 7,657.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47902 Burlington Engineering,Inc. 326.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47903 BI Technologies 360.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47904 BP West Coast Products,L.L.C. 950.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47905 Cambm Manufacturing 2,213.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47906 Cannon Equipment West 2.517.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47907 Caren Precision Engineering 880.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47908 Central Powder Coating 686.98 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47909 Ceradyne,Inc. 8.23329 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47910 Cheek Engineering&Stamping 562.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47911 Cherry Textron 16,553.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47912 Criterion Machine Works 730.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47913 Crockett Container Corp. 4,232.42 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47914 Custom Enamelers,Inc. 711.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47915 Dee Shin USA,Inc. 1,143.05 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47916 Data Aire,Inc. 652.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47917 Delphi Automotive Systems L.L.C. 14,70651 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47918 Derm Cosmetic Labs,Inc. 3,308.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47919 Details,Inc. 2,210.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47920 DRS Technologies 2.301.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 7 of 10 PYWIRIT e Claims Paid From 10/01102 to 10/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47921 Eaton CorporationIMSC Products 4,180.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47922 Engravers Ink Company 30.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47923 Enthone/Fry's Metals/Alpha Metal Div. 11.221.78 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47924 Essex Group,Inc. 11.937.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47925 Flexible Metal Hose Manufacturing 558.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47926 Fullerton Foods/Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. 2,955.80 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47927 Fullerton Plating 2,063.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47928 Gardner Lithograph 769.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47929 General Container Corp. 2,118.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47930 Georgia Pack 16,974AS Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47931 Gomtech Electronics 128.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47932 Goodwin Company 7,391.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47933 Gorilla's Polishing and Plating Corp, 272.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47934 Graphic Packaging Corp. 1,132A7 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47935 H Koch 8 Sons 2.347.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47936 Hamilton Materials 2,235.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47937 Harbor Truck Bodies 1,033.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47938 The Hartwell Corporation 4.301.91 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47939 High Tech Coatings SF 113.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47940 Hightower Plating 8 Manufacturing Co. 4,171.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47041 Hyatt Die Casting 6 Engineering Corp. 605.91 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47942 Irvine Sensors Corp. 3,844.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47943 ICN Pharmaceuticals 1,354.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47944 PC Cal Flex, Inc. 151.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47045 ITT Cannon Electric 13,099.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47946 ITT Jabsoo Products 2,069.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47847 J.R.8 D..Inc. 3,812.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47948 J-Tron,Inc. 13.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47949 Jefferson Smurfit Corp. 9,171.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47950 Johnson Controls, Inc. 9.666.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47961 KCA Electronics, Inc. 22.005.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47962 Lam Lighting,Inc. 1,802.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47953 Los Alamitos General Hospital 4.644.91 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47954 M.S.Bellows 152.01 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47965 Magnetic Metals Corporation 1,080.91 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47966 Voided Check 47957 Milbank West,Inc. 5,212.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47958 Monogram Systems 1,535.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47959 Newport Corporation 10.045.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47960 Olympic Coating 9.277.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47961 Orange Container 5.893.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47982 Orange County Sanitation District 228.68 Petry Cash Reimb. 47963 Pacifica Aerospace Corp. 1,754.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47964 Payton Technology Corp. 4.862.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47965 Pico Farad,Inc. 655.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 8 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 10101102 to 10115/02 - Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47966 Pilkington Aerospace 11.386.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47967 Pleon Corp. 932.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47988 Powdercoat Services 118AI Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47969 Powdercoat Services 309.83 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47970 Precious Metals Plating Co. 21.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47971 Precision Painting 1.526.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47972 Precon,Inc. 109.64 Reconcilletion User Fee Refund Program 47973 Revere Transducers 2.652.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47974 Ricoh Electronics 4.718.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47976 Sanmina Corporation 1,104.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47976 Sanmina Corporation 2.346.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47977 Santana Services 150.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47978 Semiooa 279.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47979 South Bay Chrome Sales 148.98 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47980 South Coast Water Company 55.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47981 St Jude Medical Center 3.804.15 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47982 Superior Processing 102.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47983 Taormina Industries.Inc. 142.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47984 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 3,364A6 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47985 Thermco Systems,Inc. 794.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47986 Toyota Racing Development 1,437AS Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47987 Troy Systems, Inc. 952.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Pmgmm 47986 United Circuit Technology 1.337.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47989 UC Regents 360.00 O&M.Admin and Communications Meeting Registration 47990 Vencor,Inc. 7,45329 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47991 West American Rubber Company 7,002.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47992 Weyerhauser Company 17,280.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47993 XZX Electronics,Inc. 76.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47994 V K K(USA),Inc. 3,859.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47995 Y2K Textile Co.,Inc. 1.374.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47996 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 62.050.00 Professional Services J-73-2 47997 Bell Land Surveying 31.421.74 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 47998 Black&Veatch Corporation 185,804.93 Engineering Services Pt-76&P2-85 47999 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 164,425.16 (100)Computers,(50)Monitors&(1)Notebook 48000 Delta Dental 49,138.24 Dental Insurance Plan 48001 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 72,639.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4,22-98 48002 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 29-500.00 Professional Services-Fat,Oil&Grease Control Study,Phase 1 48003 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 67,651.07 Construction-Basin M Sludge Line Repair 48004 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 41.492.50 Medical Insurance Premium 48005 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 139.476.61 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 48006 NRG Energy,Inc. 80.378.49 Chemicals 48007 Pacific Ford 60.855.04 (3)Ford 15-Passenger Commuter Vans 48008 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 182,243.60 Sodium Hypochlorile 48009 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 110,283.55 Prof.Serv.J-85,NPDES Permit Application&Ocean Monitoring 48010 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 157.524.03 Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95 Page 9 of 10 EXHIRIT A Claims Paid From 10101102 to 10/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48011 SPEC Services,Inc. 55,690.94 Engineering Services J-33-1 48012 Tran Consulting Engineers 96,199.00 Engineering Services 7-21 8 1-17 48013 Tule RanchlMagan Farms 106.024.96 Residuals Removal MO 3-2945 48014 U.S.Peroxide 269.307.88 Hydrogen Pemwde 48015 The Yakima Company 105,206.65 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 48016 Adams/MaDory Construction Co.,Inc. 69,608.40 Construction J-80 48017 MMC,Inc. 36,224.19 Cored.-Ventilation Sys.Upgrades-Main St.Pump Sta. 48018 Coral Energy Resources,L.P. 95,755.32 Natural Gas 48019 BPS Technologies 26,279.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48020 Dharma Consulting 16,025.00 Technical Services Off-Site Retreat-Training 48021 Air Products 8 Chemicals 26,758.02 O 8 M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,217,407.63 Payroll Disbursements 27792-27893 Employee Paychecks $ 156,011.92 Biweekly Payroll 10/02/02 27894-27894 Interim Paycheck 895.43 Adjustment 77374-77839 Direct Deposit Statements 803,842.27 Biweekly Payroll 10/02/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 960,749.62 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 44.339.28 September Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association 118,356.99 Societe Generale September Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 162.696.27 Total Claims Paid 10101102-10115102 $ 5,340,853.52 Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 10116102 to 10/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 48022 American Express 6 40,132.45 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 48023 Conemm Systems, Inc. 47,389.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40024 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 53.565.02 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 48025 Orange County Business Council 25.000.00 Membership 48026 Orange County Sanitation District 541.920.00 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 48027 Wald Citrus West 65,533.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48028 Airgas Safety 1.059.30 Safety Supplies&Equipment 48029 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 83.01 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48D30 Anaheim Hills Auto Body 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48031 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 60.73 Telephone Service 48032 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 48033 Circuit Center 136.99 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48034 City of Huntington Beach 1.200.00 Permit Fees-Coastal Development 48035 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 40036 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2,005.47 Electrical Supplies 48037 California Special Districts Association 160.00 Administrative Services Meeting Registration 48038 CSMFO 100.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 48039 Electra-Bond 996.69 Epoxy Coating 48040 Employment Development Dept. 4,219.00 State Unemployment Tax 48041 Court Order 525.OD Wage Garnishment 48042 Franchise Tax Board 545.44 Wage Garnishment 48M Gilmour Group do Lippincott Co. 1,200.62 Hoses 48W Industrial Metal Supply 254.50 Metal 48045 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 707.17 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48046 Ind. Union of Dow. Eng.AFL-CIO Loral 501 3,258.9D Dues Deduction 48047 JP Morgan Chase Bank 8,056.01) COP Trustee Services-1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation 48048 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 765.15 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 48049 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 11.610.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48050 Motion Industries 17.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48051 National Bond&Trust 1,056.55 U.S.Saving Bonds 480.52 Newport Lido Medical Center 22.640.27 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48053 Orange County Sheriff 45.00 Wage Garnishment 480M OCDM Marketing 3.732.93 Mass Mailing Postage-Bushard Project 48055 OCEA 524.61 Dues Deduction 48056 Pacific Bell 68.38 Telephone Services 48057 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 48058 Paragon Steel 2.113.12 Metal 48059 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 48060 Peace Officers Council of CA 11,098.00 Dues Deduction 48061 Penick Partners 926.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48062 PS Business Parks 2,963.78 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48053 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 210.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48064 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 395.00 Engineering Training Registration 48065 Sears,Roebuck and Company 474.94 Reconciliafion User Fee Refund Program 48066 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 5,773.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 1 of 12 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 10/16102 to 10131/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48067 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 48M So.Cal.Gas Company 23,554.35 Natural Gas 48M Southern California Edison 2.334.22 Power 48070 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 4.760.50 COP Trustee Services-Series 2000 Certificates of Participation 48071 Super Power Products 646.50 Janitorial Supplies 48072 SMT Dynamics Corporation 460.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48073 Daily Pilot 181.25 Notices 8 Ads 48074 The Unisource Corporation 25274 Once 8 Stationery Supplies 48075 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 48076 Varco Systems 21.581.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48077 Verizon California 2,340.09 Telephone Services 48078 Westamedca Graphics 2,890.38 Printing 48079 WEF 560.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 48080 Nicholas J.Aromas 122.00 Meeling/Trsinlnd Expense Reimbursement 4W81 Jeffrey Brown 1.372.83 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48082 Frank Chavez 1,189.60 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48083 Court Order 1,593.69 Meetirg/Trening Expense Reimbursement 48084 Jerry F.Evangelista 112.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48085 Dionne Kardos 480.57 MeelingfTrainirg Expense Reimbursement 48086 Vladimir A.Kogan 1.349.10 Meating/Treinhg Expense Reimbursement 48087 Unda Losurdo 17700 Meefing/Training Expense Reimbursement 48088 Simon L.Watson 612.83 Meefing/Trelning Expense Reimbursement 48089 Charles F.Wa sor 815.53 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48090 Ernest N.Veboah 586.15 Meeting/Trsining Expense Reimbursement 4B091 Almatron Electronics 79.98 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48092 Aluminum Forge 838.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48093 B.Braun Medical, Inc. 922.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48094 Bridgford Foods Corporation 81.90 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48095 BAF Industries 25205 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 4BD96 Chrome Technology,Inc. 78.95 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48097 ally of Tustin Water Service 2,223.01 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48098 Dan Siwulec Communications Marketing 954.87 Public Notice Services 8 Postage 48M Danco Metal Surfacing/Anomil Ent. 547.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48100 Disneyland Resort 20,360.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48101 El Toro Meat Shop 14.842.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48102 Electroservices 2000,Inc 80.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48103 Health Care Apparel Services 1.443.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48104 Ideal Anodizing 1,125.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48105 Integrated Aerospace,Inc. 111.71 Reconaliallon User Fee Refund Program 48106 L 8 N Uniform Supply Co. 85922 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48107 Leach Corp. 127.81 ReconciliaLon User Fee Refund Program 48108 Los Angeles Times 910.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48109 Margaretis Textile Service 10.154.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48110 Mask Technology, Inc. 810.94 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48111 Metal Powder Products 1,883.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48112 Newport Fab,L.L.C. 82724 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 2 of 12 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 10/16/02 to 10/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45113 Pacific Quartz,Inc. 661.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46114 Precision Circuits West 41.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48115 California Fineblanking Corp. 848.91 Recenclliatlon User Fee Refund Program 48110 Prime Technologies,Inc. 516.05 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48117 Pdntronu,Inc. 133.42 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48118 Santa Ana Reg.Water Quality Control 500.00 Permit Certification 1-2-4 48119 South Coast Circuits#2 552.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48120 South Coast Oil Corp 60.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48121 Statek Corporation 468.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48122 Steiner Corporation 515.58 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48123 Stepan Company 16,141.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48124 Toyota Racing Development 491.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48125 UWMC Hospital Corp. 1,040.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48126 Vehe Circuits,Inc. 1,848.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48127 Victory Circuits,Inc. 57.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48128 Weber Precision Graphics 485.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48129 West Newport Oil Company 8,115.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48130 Winonics 3.795.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48131 AKM Consulting Engineers 47,092.93 Professional Services 7-41 48132 Black&Veatch Corporation 75.639.15 Engineering Services J•77 48133 Brown&Caldwell 126.215.41 Engineering Services P1-37&1-98 48134 Carollo Engineers 33.319.71 Engineering Services P2-66&J-39 48135 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 25,056.08 Professional Services-Hazardous Energy Control Project 48136 Coral Energy Resources,L.P. 100,653.60 Natural Gas 48137 Clba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 62.084.69 Cationic Polymer 45138 DWG Associates 35.030.61 Professional Services-Oxygen Plant Replacement/Rehabililatlon Assessment 48139 Irvine Technology Corporation 25,040.00 Temporary Employment Services 48140 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 55.606.67 Femc Chloride MO 9-27-95 4814l Lee&Ro,Inc. 48,739.36 Engineering Services-5.49,5-50,5-51&5-52 48142 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 55,563.19 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 48143 NetVersant of Southern California 43,741.94 Human Resources Security System Improvements 48144 Northwest Industrial Scrub,Inc. 43,570.00 Professional Services-Cleaning Digesters @ Pit.2 48145 Orange County Water District 74.733.39 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 48146 Parsons Infrastructure&Tech.Group 29,180.46 Professional Services-Strategic Plan for Asset Management 48147 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 63,373.33 Sodium Hypochlorte 48148 Projects Partners 26,336.95 Temporary Employment Services 48149 Southern California Edison 76,016.47 Power 48150 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 245,07721 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 48151 Systime Computer Corp 40,200.00 Professional Services-JD Edwards One-World XE Implementation 48152 Tetra Tech,Inc. 27.049.20 Professional Services-7-37 48153 Tule Ranch/Magan Fama 108,689.40 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 48154 U.S.Peroxide 26,710.19 Hydrogen Peroxide 48155 US Filter/Envirex 74.991.81 Install(2)Chain&Flight Sludge Collectors 48156 Victor Buick-GMC Truck 37,39525 (1)2-Ton 2003 Chevrolet/GM Truck 48157 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 89,332.11 Legal Services MO7-26-95 48158 The Yakima Company 37,383.34 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 Page 3 of 12 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 10/16/02 to 10/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48159 California Banks Trust 52,376.00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention 48160 Connolly-Pacific Company 1,810,252.00 Construction J-39 48161 Manuel Bros.,Inc. 46,125.00 Construction-Fiber Optic Cabling Extension at Pit.2 48162 Margate Construction,Inc. 2,285,696.00 Construction P2-39,J-71-7&P7-37 48163 Southern Contracting Company 471,37&00 Construction J-33-1 48164 Favonte Foods,Inc. 30,532.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48165 Irvine Ranch Water District 67,684.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48166 Orange County Sanitation District 33,24SA7 Workers Comp. Reimb. 48167 A-Plus Systems 1,567.07 Notices&Ads 48168 AccuStandard, Inc. 1,035.15 Lab Parts&Supplies 48169 Air&Waste Management Assoc. 600.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 48170 Alrilome Express 101.30 Air Freight 48171 Alrgas-West 9.90 Lab Supplies 48172 Airgas Safety 3,284.34 Safety Supplies&Equipment 48173 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 5,419.83 Manhole Frames&Covers 48174 American Red Cross 52200 CPR Training&Mac.Supplies 48175 Amot Control Corporation 80.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48176 Appleone Employment Service 14,975.00 Temporary Employment Services 48177 AMSA 575.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 48178 API Basco,Inc. 1,255.50 Heat Exchanger 48179 API Fund For Payroll Education,Inc. 848.00 Accounting Training Registration 48180 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 212.73 Telephone Service 48181 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 164.00 Cellular Telephone Service 48182 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 48183 Baker Tanks 2.626.89 Tank Rentals 48184 Ballantyne,Inc. 17.748.00 Temporary Employment Services 48185 Basic Chemical Solutions 8,499.86 Sodium Bisulfde 48186 Battery Specialties 808.13 Batteries 48187 Beach Paving,Inc. 975.00 Asphalt Repair 48188 Camel Financial,Inc.do Bearing Metal 301.54 Metal 48189 Bell Land Surveying 2,603.55 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 48190 Berendsen Fluid Power 218.88 Mechanical Supplies 48191 BioNlerieux Vitek,Inc. 1,027.75 Lab Supplies 48192 Boyle Engineering Corporation 474.59 Engineering Services 2-31 48193 Cal State University - 50.00 Compliance Training Registration 48194 California Auto Collision 1.037.63 Vehicle Body Repairs&Painting 48195 California Coastal Coalition 1,000.00 Membership 48196 California Relocation Services,Inc. 303.75 Office Moving Services 48197 Southern California Marine Institute 1,160.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 46198 California Urban Water Conserv.Council 300.00 Annual Contribution-Education&Research 48199 California Wcodwortdng Machinery 3,207.44 Mechanical Equipment 48200 Charles P.CrovAey Co. 166.01 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 4a201 Clarke Sales 485.39 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48202 Communications Supply Corp. 268.20 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48203 Compressor Components of California 1,248.00 Compressor Cleaning&Testing 48204 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 6,334.07 Computer Maint.Agreement Page 4of 12 EXHIBIT " Claims Paid From 10116102 to 10131/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48205 Computer Sciences Corp. 6,860.32 Consult ng&tab Services-Assay Pilot Project 48206 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 5.729.97 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48207 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 2,691.20 Plumbing Supplies 48M Cooper Energy Services 15.466.22 Engine Supplies 48209 Corporate Express 3.196.37 Office Supplies 48210 Cost Containment Solutions 697.75 Workers Comp.Services 48211 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 1.061 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48212 County Sanitation Dists of Los Angeles 2,720.00 Olfactometry Lab Analyses 48213 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.036.44 Electrical Pads&Supplies 48214 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Maine.Agreement-Can Gen Water Sooner System 48215 Custom Control Sensors 426.19 Electrical Supplies 48216 CAPIO 175.00 Membership-California Association of Public Info.Officials 48217 CR&R,Inc. 1,89D.00 Container Rentals 48218 CWFA Membership 276.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 48219 CWFA Specialty Conference 120.D0 Air Quality Meeting Registration 48220 Del Mar Analytical 234.03 Biosolids Analysis 48221 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 4,929.25 Sofiaare Upgrade 48222 Driver Allianl Insurance Service,Inc. 807.00 2001-02 Excess Workers Compensation Ins.Additional Premium 48223 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 13D.39 Electrical Supplies 48224 Edison ESI 2.594.63 Sound Board Replacement-Steam Turbine Generator 48225 Electra-Bond 2.472.87 Epoxy Application 48226 Element K Journals 89.00 Subscription 48227 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 537.25 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 48228 Enchanter, Inc. 4,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 48229 Environmental&Occupational Risk Mgmt 1,200.00 Professional Services J-33-1 48230 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 2,124.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 48231 Environmental Science Associates 22,301.42 Professional Services J30-5 48232 Pacific Stales Chemical,Inc. 0,022.52 Chemicals 48233 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 629.96 Plumbing Supplies 48234 Emedco 227.80 Identification Signs 48235 FedEx Corporation 117.04 Air Freight 48236 Fllarsky&Watt,L.L.P. 4.750.00 Professional Services,SPMT Negotiations 48237 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 7.755.49 Lab Parts&Supplies 48238 Flomax Products 817.43 Plumbing Supplies 48239 Fluid Components Intl clo Ponton Ind, 7,698.63 Instrument Parts&Supplies 48240 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 715.26 Truck Wash Tickets 48241 Franklin Covey 524.64 Office Supplies 48242 FNs Electronics 215.49 Computer Supplies 48243 General Petroleum 12,157.32 Gasoline 48244 George T. Hall 1.059.43 Electrical Supplies 48245 Getinge Castle 516.00 Lab Supplies 48246 Goidemvest Fence Company 863.75 Construction P2-60 48247 WIN Grainger,Inc. 3,783.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48248 Gmybar 16,916.32 Instrument Enclosures,Parts&Supplies 48249 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 89.99 Janitorial Supplies 48250 Westmark Sales,Inc1GLl IntlJHach Co. 3,378.00 Instrument Supplies Page 5 of 12 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 10/16/02 to 10/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48251 Hach c/o Ponlon Industries 179.63 Lab Parts&Supplies 48252 American Sigma,Inc. 462.51 Lab Pans&Supplies 48253 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 48254 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 115.35 Plumbing Supplies 48255 Hasty Oil Co.,Inc. 186.95 Lube Oil 48255 Hatch&Kirk,Inc 2,699.84 Engine Generator Control Supplies 49257 HBti,Inc. 4,909.70 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 48258 Hone Depot 95.69 Small Hardware 48259 Hopkins Technical Products 42.72 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48260 Horizon Technology 1,478.27 Lab Parts&Supplies 48261 Hub Auto Supply 37.77 Truck Pads 48262 dexx 1,336.10 Lab Pads&Supplies 48263 Industrial Distribution Group 1,069.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48264 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 14.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48265 Information Handling Services 2,870.00 Software Maintenance Agreement 48266 Information Resources 250.00 Human Resources Service 48267 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 231.96 Lab Pads&Supplies 48268 Inside CAUEPA 635.00 Subscription 48269 Insight Direct USA,Inc. 11.150.70 (4)Primers 48270 Interstate Battery Systems 297.06 Batteries 48271 Invensys Systems,Inc. 3,19264 Instrument Supplies 48272 Iron Mountain 150.02 Bid Document Storage Fees-P"7&J-39 48273 Iron Mountain Off-She Data Protection 237.71 Offsile Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 48274 Irvine Ranch Water District 5BA2 Water Use 48275 Isco,Inc 651.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 48276 IBM Corp. 2.614.50 Maintenance Agreement-IBM 3570 Magstar Magnetic Tape System 48277 ISI,Ina 1.663.80 Service Agreement-Communication Equipment 48278 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 3,161.88 Instrument Supplies 48279 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 2,156.58 Construction-Repair 3-Waterline at Pit. 1 Admin.Parking Lot 48280 Jays Catering 655.72 Meeting Expenses 48281 Johnstone Supply 324.01 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48282 Kalmar Promotions 668.75 Printing 48283 Kelly Paper 112.04 Paper 48284 Kforce Professional Staling 23.980.41 Temporary Employment Services 48286 KL&P Marketing 304.29 Safety Incentive Items 48286 KW Communications Consulting 1.143.75 Professional Services-Community Outreach Program 48287 Lab Support 4MM75 Temporary Employment Services 48288 Lessons in Leadership 3,696.00 O&M Training Registration 48289 LifecomSafety,Inc. 385.61 Safety Supplies 48290 Maintenance Technology Corp. 510.86 Mechanical Supplies 48291 Mana0,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 15.000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 48292 Arthur Marco6e 1,267.15 Medical Insurance Overpayment 48293 MarVac Electronics 17.46 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48294 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 1.241.30 Executive Disability Plan Premium 48295 Matrix Service Corp. 8.503.00 Repairs&Maintenance-Low Pressure Gas Holder at Plant 2 48296 Mc Junkin Corp. 37.60 Plumbing Supplies Page 6 of 12 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 10116/02 to 10131/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48297 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 2,739.91 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48298 MCRay Industries,Inc. 4,495-40 Stainless Steel Tank 48M Mission Uniform Service 4=28 Uniform Rentals 48300 MOB Consulting 1.890.00 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 48301 National Plant Services, Inc. 440.00 Vacuum Truck Services 48302 City of Newport Beach 9.37 Water Use 48303 Nextel Communications 3,428.58 Cellular Phones&Air Time 48304 The Norm Companies 312.00 Mail Delivery Service 48WS Norms Refrigeration 158.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48306 Northern Tool&Equipment Company, Inc. WZ32 Generator 48307 Nu-Way laser Engraving 28.75 Steel Tags 48308 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.552.13 Once Supplies 48309 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 16423 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48310 Orange County Hose Company 26.93 Hose 48311 Orange County Vector Control District 2,666.62 Pest Control 48312 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 661.35 Plumbing Supplies 48313 Oxygen Service Company 2,013A3 Specialty Gases 48314 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 657.28 Electrical Supplies 48315 Pace Analytic Services 1,300.00 Lab Analyses of Wastewater&Biosolids 48316 Pacific Bell 1,224.42 Telephone Services 48317 Pacific Bell Internet Services 328.93 Internet Service 48318 Pacific High Reach, Inc. 3.456.46 Aerial Lift Rental 48319 Pacific Institute 100.00 Membership 48320 Pacific Mechanical Supply 458.90 Plumbing Supplies 48321 Pacific Pans&Controls 3,416.34 Electrical Supplies 48322 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 215.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48323 Parker Supply Company 9.557.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48324 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 1,807.08 Engineering Services J42 48M Partners Consulting Services 23.340.00 Help Desk Consulting Services 48326 Parts Unlimited 361.63 Truck Supplies 48327 Paul Pitt 4,575.00 Professional Services J-87 48328 Pearl Art&Craft Supplies of California 72.41 Graphic Supplies 48M Peedess Wiping Materials Go. 536.06 Janitorial Supplies 48330 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 496.45 lab Pads&Supplies 48331 P'uelpushers, Inc. 18,931.00 Professional Services-Design&Constmct Internet Site 48332 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 52325 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 48333 PIGS Express 220.00 Courier Service 48334 R.F.MacDonald Co. 2.676.83 Motor 48335 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,300.12 Trash Removal 40M Real6me Systems Corporation 10.999.97 Professional Services-Software Revision 48337 Regents of Urdv.of California 2,070.49 Professional Services J-85 4MW Ryan Herm Products Corp. 725.09 Pump Supplies 4OW RBF Engineers 5.379.09 Engineering Services 2-24-1 48340 RM Controls 63.19 Instrument Supplies 48341 RPM Electric Motors 268.30 Motor 48342 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 419.16 Paint Supplies Page 7 of 12 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 10/16/02 to 10/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48343 Safety Storage,Inc. 1.608.89 Doors 48344 Safetycare,Inc. 237.05 Safety Video 48345 Sancen Engineering,Inc. 3,045.00 Construction-Airvent Manhole Dewatedng&Mineral Deposit Cleaning 48346 Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency 1.400.00 Annual Dues 48347 Schreiber Corporation 7,500.00 3 MGD Fuzzy Filler Test Unit 48348 Schwing America,Inc. 100.07 Pump Supplies 48349 Science Applications Ing.,Corp. 4,567.51 Professional Services Pt-85 48350 Seal Beach Chamber of Commerce 220.00 Tent Rental 48351 Seavisual Consulting,Inc. 7.560.00 Professional Services-Ocean Oudall Instrumentation 48352 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1.849.06 Safety Supplies 48353 Shimadzu Scientific Instruments,Inc. 1.293.00 Hazardous Disposal Service 48354 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 366.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48356 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 668.75 Lab Parts&Supplies 48356 SoftChoice 4,226.28 Software 48357 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 5.160.00 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Permit Fees 48358 Southern California Edison 31.48 Paver 48359 Sparkletts 1,639.86 Drinking Water/Coder Rentals 48360 Spat Cerliprep, Inc. 1.170.05 Lab Parts&Supplies 48361 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 1,534.55 Carpet Cleaning Services 48362 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 506.77 Stationery&Office Supplies 48363 Strata International,Inc. 605.46 Chemicals 48364 Strategic Diagnostics, Inc. 915.94 Software 48365 Summit Steel 346.23 Metal 48366 Sunset Ford 362.16 Vehicle Supplies 48367 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,658.25 Mechanical Supplies 48368 Symcas-TSG 1,354.18 Maintenance Agreement-SCADA System 48369 SAWPA 3,000.00 Santa Ana River Watershed Group-Other Agencies Contribution 48370 SETAC 630.0D Compliance Meeting&Training Registration 48371 SPX Valves&Control 2.594.09 Valves 48372 Target Specialty Products 85.69 Insecticide 48373 The Orange County Register 144.96 Notices&Ads 48374 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 491.76 Mechanical Supplies 48375 Daily Pilot 50.00 Notices&Ads 48376 The Tmne Company 273.19 Elecuical Supplies 48377 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 923.07 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 48378 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 2427 Automotive Supplies 48379 True%fail Laboratories,Inc. 180.00 Lab Services 48M TCH Associates,Inc. 7.12528 Lab Supplies 48381 Teksystems 18,600.00 Temporary Employment Services 48382 US Filter Corporation 1262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 48383 Underground Service Alen of So.Calif. 325.00 Underground Mileage Charges 48384 United Parcel Service 782.36 Parcel Services 48385 Defense Finance and Accounting 6.193.15 Professional Services J-85 48M Universal Specialties,Inc. 1,065.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48387 University of Washington 640.00 O&M Training Registration 48388 USC-TRG Conference on Siofiltratlon 350.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration Page 8 of 12 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 10/16/02 to 10131102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48389 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 20,852.00 Temporary Employment Service 48390 Varian Associates,Inc 1,038.88 Lab Parts&Supplies 48391 Vedzon California 4,077.44 Telephone Services 48392 Vocam USA,L.L.C. 357.65 Safety Video 48393 Vortex Industries, Inc. 374.10 Door Repair 48394 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 9.598.73 Lab Parts&Supplies 48395 The Wackenhut Corporation 9,552.97 Security Guards 48396 Weber Scientific 169.50 Lab Supplies 48397 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 128.68 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48398 Xerox Corporation 1,021.D3 Copier Leases 48399 XESyslem, Inc. 550.50 Office Supplies 484D0 3T Equipment Company 211.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48401 ShabUr S.Bassi 10021 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 48402 Mark A.Esquer 164.00 Meegng/Tralydng Expense Reimbursement 48403 Ingrid G.Hellebrand 448.69 Meefing/Tmirilng Expense Reimbursement 48404 Mike J.Herten 186.12 Meefing?raining Expense Reimbursement 48405 John H.Lin 1.330.86 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 48406 David A.LudWn 1.162.64 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 48407 Michael D.Moore 309.00 Meelingrrralning Expense Reimbursement 48408 Fred J.OBden 710.65 Mealing/Traming Expense Reimbursement 48409 Simon L.Watson 175.00 Meatingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 48410 William F.Webster,Jr. 1,387.91 MeatingRraining Expense Reimbursement 48411 Advance Tech Plating 51.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48412 Air Industries 11.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48413 Ambriz,Jose 1.559.56 Employee Computer Loan Program 484% American Circuit Technology 529.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48415 Anaheim General Hospital 100.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48416 Black Oxide Industries 169.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 40417 Bright Armor Plating 499.78 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48418 Burrows Ind./Minuteman 3,013.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48419 California Consolidated Water 7,830.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48420 Calif.Consolidated Water Purification 1.693.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48421 California Custom Shapes,Inc. 453.27 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48422 Cargill, Inc. 3.442.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48423 Century Laminators 2.544.35 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48424 Copper Clad Multilayer Product 2,191.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48425 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,695.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 48426 Crest Coatings 578.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48427 CMAA 170.00 Engineering Meeting Registration 48428 Electronic Precision 1,521A7 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48429 Employee Activity Committee 180.00 Meeting Expenses 48430 Future Technology 1,749.36 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46431 Harys Dye&Wash,Inc. 15,282.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48432 Huntington Gardens Center 107.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48433 Imperial Plating 37,12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48434 Intec Products,Inc. 825.51 Reconcillatlon User Fee Refund Program Page 9 of 12 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 10116102 to 10131102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 49435 International Food Solutions,Inc. 2,323.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48436 Kodak Processing Labs 2.813.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48437 KCA Electronics,Inc. 10.059.35 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48438 La Palma Intercommunity,Hospital 168.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48439 Voided Check - - 48440 Micromelals, Inc. 11.980.27 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48441 Orange County Sanitation District 1,851.10 Petty Cash Relmb. 48442 Packard-Hughes Interconnect 2,146.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48443 Pepsi-Cola Bottling 4.405.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48444 Plegel Oil Company 224.01 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48445 Prima-Tex Industries 307.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48446 Procter&Gamble 19,99429 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48447 Quality Aluminum Forge,Inc. 77.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48448 RBC Transport Dynamics 2,074.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48449 Scientific Spray Finishes 52.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48450 Simpson,Albert 1,525.18 Employee Computer Loan Program 48451 Speedy Circuits,Facility 1,108.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48452 Sundipse,Inc. 23,589.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48453 SB Thomas 8.957.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48454 Tayco Engineering 7,928.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund!Program 48M Voided Check - - 48456 Villa Park Orchards Assoc. 5.596.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Pmgram 48457 Western Yam Dyeing,Inc. 311.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48458 Wild Rivers Walerpark 1,292.00 Reimbursable Employee Activity Expense 48459 Wirmnics 3.731.04 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48460 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 104,950.60 Construction J-80,Retention 48461 Margate Construction,Inc. 82,504.00 Construction P2-85-1,Retention 48462 Orange County Sanitation District 537,461.52 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 48463 Orange County Water District 275,063.71 GWRS Joint Proles J-36 48464 Southern California Edison 81.708.50 Power 48455 Airgas Safety 414.16 Safety Supplies 48466 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc 178.62 Mechanical Supplies 48467 AMSA 1,350.00 Source Control Training Registration 48468 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 42.33 Telephone Service 48469 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3.732-83 Cellular Telephone Service 48470 California Industrial Supplies 331.41 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48471 Condition Monitoring Solutions 20,458.47 Rotalign Pro Laser Shaft Alignment System 48472 Consolidated Elea.Distributors,Inc. 224.09 Electrical Supplies 48473 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 489.73 Plumbing Supplies 48474 Corporate Express 2,571.14 Office Supplies 48475 CWEA Membership 9200 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 48470 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 8,321.31 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 48477 Franchise Tax Board 464.07 Wage Garnishment 48478 City of Huntington Beach 15,SB8.21 Water the 48479 Imark Communications,Inc. 3,980.00 Information Technology Training Registration 48480 International Institute for Learning 90.17 Professional Services-RACI Diagram Wall Chart Page 10 of 12 EXHIBIT B , Claims Paid From 10116/02 to 10131102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48481 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 12,015.00 Construction-Fire Closet with Fire Rated Doors for Nitrogen Tanks 48482 Johnson 8 Associates,L.L.C. 1,238.78 Professional Services-Compensation 8 Classification Study 48483 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 4.048.22 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 48484 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 1,917.98 Mechanical Repairs 48485 MMC,Inc. 21,412.10 Conet.-Ventilation Sys.Upgrades-Main St.Pump Stn.,Retention 48486 National Bond 3 Trust 1,512.66 U.S.Saving Bonds Payroll Deduction 48487 City of Newport Beach 71.05 Water Use 48488 Orange County Sheriff 45.00 Wage Garnishment 48489 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 2,484.84 Plumbing Supplies 46490 OCEA 52A.61 Dues Deduction 48491 Pacific Bell 18.44 Telephone Services 48492 R B R Instrumentation, Inc. 1,607.57 Instrument Supplies 48493 Reliastar 17.967.50 Employee Basic Life Insurance Premium 48494 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 293.38 Plumbing Supplies 48495 Southern California Water 96.09 Water Use 48496 Summit Steel 574.86 Metal 48497 SAWPA 3,000.00 Santa Ana River Watershed Group-Other Agencies Contribution 48498 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 339.60 Mechanical Supplies 48499 Union Bank of California 3.682.13 Banking Services 48500 The Unisource Corporation 8,163.91 Office Supplies 48501 United Way 205.00 Employee Contribution 48502 Verizon 3,068.03 Software Maintenance Agreement 48503 Verizon Calffomla 805.24 Telephone Services 48504 Xerox Corporation 161.63 Fax Machine 48505 Jose C.Ambdz 277.95 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 48506 David Andrade 128.99 Meetingrrreining Expense Reimbursement 48507 Jeffrey L.Amrstrong 744.D4 Mestingrfraining Expense Reimbursement 48MB Brian Bingman 2,092.39 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 48W9 Thomas M.Blends 1,250.84 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 48510 Leandre P.Cateculan 972.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48511 David M.Chafe 355.91 Meetingri-raming Expense Reimbursement 48512 George R.Crawford 489.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48513 Timothy D.Foley 244.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48514 Victoria L.Henn 104.64 Meelingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 48515 Victor R.Hermelin 256.70 Meetingrriaming Expense Reimbursement 48516 Luis A. Marta 373.91 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 48517 Michael J.McCusker 356.89 Maetingrriaming Expense Reimbursement 48518 Daniel R.Miranda 346.67 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48519 Ray Pamino 363.58 Meelingrrraming Expense Reimbursement 48520 William F.Pierce 179.52 MestingrPraming Expense Reimbursement 48521 Alan D.Ralph 388.17 Meeting/Training Expense Relmhursemenl 485M Michael Reideler 159.57 Meeting/Training Expanse Reimbursement 48523 Adrian Renescu 998.68 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement 48524 Mahin Talebl 730.72 Meefing?ralning Expense Reimbursement 48525 Mary S.Thompson 206.78 Meetingrrralning Expense Reimbursement 48526 Walter W.Williams 256.29 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement Page 11 of 12 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 101161D2 to 10/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48527 Ken H.Wong 452.21 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48528 Reid Metal Finishing 426.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48529 Unocal Corporation Z434.03 Reconcillation User Fee Refund Program Total Payroll Disbursements 7 9,560,270.59 Payroll Disbursements 27895-28025 Employee Paychecks S 178,030.83 Biweekly Payroll 10/16/02 28026-28026 Interim Paycheck 7,693.64 Termination Paycheck 28027-28127 Employee Paychecks 160283.12 Biweekly Payroll 10/30/02 28128-28129 Interim Paychecks 567.64 Reissue Stale Dated Check 8 Adjustment 77840-78313 Direct Deposit Statements 824,641.46 Biweekly Payroll 10/16/02 78314-78786 Direct Deposit Statements 843,047.56 Biweekly Payroll 10/30/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 2,014,274.25 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of CA,N.A. $ 247,764.08 October Interest Payment on Sense 2000 Cedificates of Participation Chase Manhattan Bank 75,57523 Commitment Fee on Sense 200D Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 323.339.37 Total Claims Paid 10/16102-10131102 $11,897,884.25 Page 12 of 12 EXHIBIT B BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date TOBlf.Of[Nr. 12/19/02 AGENDA REPORT 1tQ1n NiinbW Rem Number _ e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 11/01/02— 11/15/02 and 11/16/02— 11/30/02 Claims Paid From 11/01/02 to 11/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 48530 Air Products&Chemicals S 25.758.02 O&M Agreement Ozy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 48531 AMSA 26,897.00 Membership 48532 Black&Veatch Corporation 142,228.65 Engineering Services Pi-76&P2415 48533 Blue Cross of California 268,809.55 Medical Insurance Premium 48534 Bdghlmail,Inc. 42,000.00 Anti-Spam Service Contract 48535 Brown&Caldwell 174.055.14 Professional Services 1-98,P7-37&W DR/CMOM 48536 Carollo Engineers 30,247.58 Professional Services J-87, P2-60&Mioofiltration Treatment Study 48537 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 117,047.OD Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 48538 Hill Brothers 41,010.04 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Tmnklinne 48539 Kemirol Pacific,Ina 178.959.60 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 48540 Kforce Professional Staffing 35.915.13 Temporary Employment Services 48541 Lea&Ro,Ina 27.142.67 Professional Services P2-47-3 48642 Orange County Water District 761,515.79 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-N&J-36 GW R System 48543 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 135.218.12 Engineering Services J-42 48544 Parsons Infrastructure&Tech.Group 217.902.46 Professional Services-Asset Management Program 48545 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 297,038.15 Sodium Hypochlodte 48546 Projects Partners 47,403.23 Temporary Employment Services 48547 Systime Computer Corp 40,200.00 Professional Services-JD Edwards One World XE Implementation 48548 SPEC Services,Inc. 68,253.54 Engineering Services P7-89&J-33-1 48549 Taylor-Dunn 40.114.20 (6)Electric Carts 48550 Tetra Tech,Inc. 51,383.57 Professional Services 7-37 48551 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 93,801.9E Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 48552 U.S.Geological Survey 92,445.78 Ocean Monitoring-J-85 48553 The Yakima Company 55,718.63 Residuals Removal MO3-22-00 48564 Agaa-Allied,Inc. 133.612.24 Construction-Natural Gas Lore Replacement at Mt. 1 48555 Mike Prich&Sons 40,985.11 Construction 613-2 48556 Great American Printing Co. 1,654.45 Paper 48557 Air Liquids America Corp. 837.11 Specialty Gasses 48556 Airgas Safety 663.01 Safety Supplies&Equipment 48559 All American Asphalt 1.896.00 Paving&Manhole Repairs at Euclid St.,Fountain Valley 48560 American Airlines 3,292.00 Travel Services 48561 Appleone Employment Service 10,257.82 Temporary Employment Services 48562 Arch Wireless 1,163.24 Pagers,Service&Airtime 48563 Ashlead Technology Rentals 388.05 Equipment Lease 48564 Atlantis Pool Care 877.50 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 48565 Awards&Trophies Company 90.14 Plaques&Awards 48566 AT&T Universal Biller 2,774.62 Telephone Service 48WT American Telephone&Telegraph Cop. 28.63 Telephone Service 48588 AT&T Wireless Services 3,214.32 Wireless Phone Services 48569 AWSI 163.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 48570 Baker Tanks 3.136.00 Tank Rentals 48571 Ballantyne,Inc. 10.788.00 Temporary Employment Services 48572 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 2,759.63 Telephone Equipment Service-Bi-Annual Contract 48573 Basic Chemical Solutions 23,251.03 Sodium Bisulfite 48574 Battery Specialties 595.39 Batteries 48575 Sauer Compressors 410.51 Safety Supplies&Equipment 48676 BioMerieuz VBek,Inc. 1,027.75 Lab Supplies Page i of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 11/01102 to 11/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48577 Breezer Construction 17.59 Mechanical Equipment 48578 Bush&Associates,Inc. 5,144.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25.97 48579 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 461.03 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Service 48580 C.S.U.F.Foundation 10.031.25 Development of Demographic Data&Support 48581 Calaol,Inc. B64.09 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48582 Martin Boyer Co.,Inc.do Cambridge Int. 2,083.33 Worker's Compensation Claims Management 48583 Cambridge Isotope Labs 2,391.74 Lab Paris&Supplies 48584 Cameron Welding Supply 47.17 Mechanical Supplies 48585 Center for Creative Growm 2,250.00 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 48586 Copeloo Capital,Inc. 1.570.25 Copier Lease 485117 Coast Fire Equipment 4,608.17 Mainl.Agreement-Fire Extinguisher Testing,Recharging&Certification at Plis.1 &2 48588 Cole-Pamner Instrument Co. 209.73 Lab Supplies 48589 Conex International,Inc. 1.112.50 Professional Services P2-60 48590 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 9,800.53 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48591 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 11421 Plumbing Supplies 48592 Cooper Energy Services 419.95 Engine Supplies 48593 Corporate Express Imaging 38271 Computer Supplies 48594 Corporate Express 10,134.40 Office Supplies 48595 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 920.01 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 48596 County Wholesale Electric Co. 355.79 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48697 CH2MHIil 14.348.15 Engineering Services J-714 48598 California Special Districts Association 195.00 Human Resources Training Registration 48599 CSDLA,District 70 2,890.00 Olfadometry Lab Expense 48600 CWEA Membership 108.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 48601 CWEA Specialty Conference 240.00 O&M Meeting Registration 48602 De Guess Glass Co.,Inc. 2,224.81 Window Glass Repairs 48603 Del Mar Analytical 518.00 Biosolids Analysis 48604 Diamond H Rewgnftlon 1.281.62 Employee Service Awards 48605 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 282.15 Paint Supplies 48608 DWG Associates 24,853.68 Professional Services-Pit.2 Oxygen Plant RehabJReplamment 48807 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc 918.97 Electrical Supplies 48608 Ecology Control Industries 1,856.87 Hazardous Waste Disposal 48M Employers Group 90.00 Human Resources Meeting Registration 46610 Employment Development Dept. 6,174.00 State Unemployment Tax 48611 Enchanter,Inc. 4,700.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 48612 Environmental Resource Association 743.75 Lab Parts&Supplies 48613 Eurolherm Controls 1,589.63 Inst.Parts&Supplies 48614 ENS Resources,Inc. 15,126.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 48615 FedEx Corporation 76.76 Arc Freight 48616 Filter Supply Company 496.33 Filters 48617 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 7,428.30 Lab Paris&Supplies 48618 Flo-Systems,Inc. 497.16 Pump Supplies 48619 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 737.04 Meeting Supplies 48620 Franklin Covey 201.62 Office Supplies 48621 Fryrs Electronics 229.16 Computer Supplies 48622 Ganahl Lumber Company 1,850.91 LumberMardware 48623 Gamae-Callahan Company 7,116.11 Chemicals 48624 General Petroleum 3,431.81 Oil Supplies Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Pald From 111O1102 to 11/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48625 George Yardley Co. 2,534.28 Lab Supplies 48626 Gerard Daniel Worldwide 132.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48627 Goldenwesl Window Service 821.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.0990015 48628 W W Grainger,Ina 1,593.71 Elecrical Parts&Supplies 48629 Graybar 7,019.40 Electrical Equipment Repair&Rebuild Services 48630 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 179.99 Janitorial Supplies 48631 Westmark Sales,IncJGLl lne./Hach Co. 1.459.47 Instrument Supplies 48632 Hach cJo Potion Industries 2.050.91 Lab Parts&Supplies 48633 American Sigma,Inc. 659.80 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48634 Harding ESE 2,692.46 Prof.Services-Vehicle Maintenance Area Study 48635 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 301.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48W6 Heal Technology Products 10,306.10 Mechanical Pats&Supplies 48637 Henry Pratt Go Southwest Valve It Equip. 3,267.62 Valves 48638 The Holman Group 728.48 Employee Assistance Program Premium 48639 Home Depot 282.22 Small Hardware 48640 Hopkins Technical Products 870.84 Pump Supplies 48641 Hub Auto Supply 104.22 Vehicle Pats&Supplies 48642 Huntington Beach,City of 191.00 Permit Fee 48M Imaging Plus,Inc. 1.332.92 Printing Service 48644 Industrial Distribution Group 3.821.79 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48645 Industrial Threaded Products.Inc. 5.559.15 Fasteners 48646 Inside CAL/EPA 035.00 Subscription 48647 Interstate Battery Systems 495.11 Batteries 48648 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1.234.76 Instrument Supplies 48649 Iron Mountain 75.94 Bid Document Storage Few-Pt-37 48650 Irvine Ranch Water District 7.38 Water Use 48651 Irvine Technology Corporation 2,800.00 Temporary Employment Services 48652 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 2,947.95 Instrument Supplies 48653 Jays Catering 2.114.04 Meeting Expenses 48654 Jerry Lee Thomas 1.180.00 Vehicle Damage Claim 48655 Lab Support 3.358.25 Temporary Employment Services 48656 Law Offices of Kinkle,Rodiger&Spriggs 100.90 Legal Services-Than vs.Kovacs; 48657 Lessons in Leadership 807.00 Plant Facilities Maintenance Training Registration 48658 LBecam-Safety,Ina 524.96 Repairs&Maintenance Services 48869 Lin/er Company clo Gerald Jones 9,078.48 Professional Service-DART NO 9-22-99 48660 Luccl's 303.14 Meeting Expense 48661 LIMS/Leller 139.00 Subscription 45662 LRP Publications 399.50 Subscription 48663 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 23,78BA5 Prof.Services-Corrosion Study,Permit Fee It Testing 48664 MassMulual Michel Financial Group 1,208A0 Executive Disability Plan Premium 48665 The Mathworks,Inc. 136.47 Software Maintenance-Mi 48666 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 342.66 Mechanical Pats&Supplies 48667 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 660.32 Electrical Repair&Rebuild Services 48668 Media Clips,Inc. 35.00 Notices&Ads 48669 Medlin Controls Co. 2,279A3 Instrument Supplies 48670 Mesa Laboratories,Inc. 9.458.00 Lab Instruments&Supplies 48671 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 3.777.50 Professional Service-Tula Ranch&Yakima Sit"Study 48672 Mid-West Associates 14.294.82 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 11/01/02 to 11/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amomt Description 48673 Mission Uniform Service 3,908.43 Uniform Rentals 48674 Mitchell Instrument Co. 55&W Instrument Parts&Supplies 48675 Moody's Investors Service 5,600.00 Series 200O Certificates of Participation Rating Maintenance Fees 48676 National Plant Services,Inc. 440.00 Vacuum Truck Services 48677 New Horimns CLC of Santa Ana 160.00 Training Registration 48678 Nexld Communications 2,991.83 Cellular Phones&Air Time 48679 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 8.247.62 Diesel Fuel 48680 Ninim If Moore Corporate Accounting 506.94 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 48681 NAS Associates,Inc. 1.548,80 Toxicity Testing 48602 NIOA 60.00 Membership-National Public Information Officers Assoc. 48683 Offm Depot Business Services Div. 06.38 Office Supplies 486M OneSource Distributors,Inc. 264,55 Electrical Para&Supplies 48MS Oracle Corporation 2,500.00 Information Technology Training Registration 48M Orange County Health Care Agency 287.00 Permit Fee 48687 Orange County Hose Company 37.98 Hose Repair&Supphes 48688 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 187.43 Lab Pans&Supplies 48689 Oxygen Service Company 385.46 Specialty Gases 48690 OCDM Marketing 1,117.16 Processing Fees-Public Notice Mailing&Postage 48691 OI Analytical 7,444.46 Lab Parts&Supplies 48692 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc 363.14 Electrical Supplies 4a693 Pace Analytic Services 1,550.00 Lab Analyses of Wastewater&Biosolds 48694 Pacific Mechanical Supply 850.46 Plumbing Supplies 48695 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 452.90 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48696 PenValve 1.211.28 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48697 Proton Industries,Inc. 5.670.97 Instrument Paris&Supplies 48698 Pnorair,Inc. 117.00 Lab Supplies 4869E Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 48700 Primary Source 814.23 Once Furniture 48701 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service 48702 R.L.Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kem County Siosolids Consulting Services 48703 Radius Maps 175-W Boundary Maps 48704 Reliasar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,388.52 Employee Life Ins.Premium,Shot-Term Disability&Cancer Ins.Payroll Deductions 48705 RosemounlNnioc 4,387.10 Instrument Supplies 48708 ITT Shared Services 2,556.81 instrument Parts&supplies 48707 Ryan How Products Corp. 492.64 Valves 48708 RPM Electric Motors 844.76 Motors 48709 Sanwn Engineering,Inc. 2.030.00 Construction-Airvenl Manhole Dewalaring 48710 Science ApplimWons Intl.,Corp. 14,353.88 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 48711 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 494.88 Lab Parts&Supplies 48712 Shepherd Machinery Co. 350.62 Automotive Supplies 49713 Shuretuck Sales&Engineering 3.802.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48714 SkillPam On-Site 5,100.00 On-Site Training 48715 Smith-Emery Company 4,982.50 Soil Testing M0 7-13-94 48716 Southern California Edison Co. 20,215.04 Construction (1)Power Pole Moved&(2) Replaced-J-77 48717 Southern California Edison 7,975.08 Power 48718 Spading Instruments.Inc. 220.98 Instrument Supplies 48719 Sulfa Treat 60.00 Freight 4872D Sunset Industrial Paris 1,916.76 Mechanical Para&Supplies Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 11/01/02 to 11/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48721 Super Chem Corporation 467.63 Chemicals 48722 Temtinix International Co. 885.00 Pest Control 48723 Textile Engineering Associates SWAT Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48724 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 59.34 Mechanical Supplies 48725 Thrifty Oil Co. 250.00 Reconclllation User Fee Refund Program 48726 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 48727 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 48728 Daily Pilot 137.50 Notices&Ads 48729 Todd Anderson 4,655.00 Professional Services J-85 48730 Toruy's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 143.15 Locks&Kays 48731 The Trans Company 3.414.27 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 48732 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 18,838.27 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11.94 48733 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 138.78 Automotive Supplies 48734 Truesciail Laboratories,Inc. 350.00 Lab Services 48735 Teksystems 10.101.00 Temporary Employment Services 48736 U.S.Metro Group.Inc. 24.785.00 Janllolel&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 48737 Ultra Scientific 1.042.45 Lab Parts&Supplies 48738 Undersea Graphic.Inc. 980.00 Contract Service-Curtail Inspection 48739 United Parcel Service 128.28 Parcel Services 48740 Urban Water Institute,Inc. 400.00 Administration Meeting Registration 48741 UCI Regents 5,219.28 Professional Services J-85 48742 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 4,352.00 Temporary Employment Service 48743 Vapax,Inc 1.532.05 Vapex Unit&Odor Neutraliong Chemicals 48744 Vertron California 30.79 Telephone Services 48745 Vortex Industries,Inc 791.84 Door Repair 48746 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 4.441.27 Lab Parts&Supplies 48747 The Wackenhut Corporation 8.532.97 Security Guards 48748 Wally Machinery and Tool Supply Inc. 1,860.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48749 Weber Scientific 1,138.76 Lab Supplies 48750 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 1,039.88 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48751 Witeg Scientific 2,214.27 Lab Parts&Supplies 48752 Xerox Corporation 7,45721 Fax&Copier Leases&Maintenance Agreements 48753 XESyswms,Inc. 213.00 Computer Supplies 48764 Urbanlec Engineering,Inc. 18,450.00 Construction J-66 48755 Blake Anderson 108.73 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48756 Patrick B.Carnahan 1,502.88 Meeling/Trairdrg Expense Reimbursement 48767 George A.Charette 290.23 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 48758 David P.Halverson 1,237.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48769 Deirdre E.Hunter 675.00 MeeOngrTralning Expense Reimbursement 48760 Chandra R.Johannesson 675.00 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 48761 Mile S.IOeinbergs 307.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48762 James W.Matte 595.00 MestingtTraining Expense Reimbursement 48763 Peter M.Morison 693.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48764 Michael R.Murray 257.20 Mesting/Traming Expense Reimbursement 48765 L.Ellen Ray 948.48 MeetingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 48766 Ernest R.Savedra 222.96 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48767 Maghew P.Smith 148.00 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 48768 Philip J.Sullivan 466.82 Meetingri-raining Expanse Reimbursement Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 11/O1102 to 11/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48769 Robert J.Taylor 454.91 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48770 Carolyn L Thompson 125.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48771 Robert C.Thompson 1,713.53 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48772 Dan Siwulec Communications Marketing 3.150.00 Postage-SARI Brochures&Notice Mailings 48773 Orange County Sanitation District 1.729.30 Petty Cash Reimb. 40774 Robyn A.Wilcox 448.19 Meegngffmining Expense Reimbursement 48775 Katser Foundation Health Plan 41.091.98 Medical Insurance Premium 48776 Orange County Sanitation District 523,099.72 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 48777 Voided Check - - 48778 Airgas Safety 1,258.78 Safety Supplies&Equipment 48779 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 43.98 Telephone Service 48780 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 48781 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 48782 Compressor Components of California 888.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48783 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 158.71 Electrical Supplies 48784 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 6.362.19 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48785 CAPIO:Calif.Assoc.of Public Into OffCs. 32.27 Publication 48786 CSMFO 50.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 48787 CWEA Membership 155.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 48788 Diehl,Evens It Co.,L.L.P. 700.00 Accounting Training Registration 48789 Element K Journals 67.00 Subscription 48790 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 8,321.31 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 48791 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 48792 City of Fountain Valley 890.00 Fire Department Permit 48793 Franchise Tax Board 336.78 Wage Garnishment 48794 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Deli 81.75 Meeting Expenses 48795 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 55.82 Office Furniture 48796 Ind.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,275.13 Dues Deduction _ 48797 Lexis-Nems, 339.02 Books&Publications 48798 McMaster-Cam Supply Co. 89.91 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 48799 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 5.645.44 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Impeller 48800 National Bond&Trust 1.512.66 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 48801 Orange County Sheriff 46.00 Wage Gamishment 48802 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 395.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48803 OCEA 524.61 Dues Deduction 40B04 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 48805 Court Omer 296.00 Wage Garnishment 48806 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,107.00 Dues Deduction 48807 Quest,J.D.Edwards Users Group 1,400.00 Membership 48808 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 119.28 Repairs&Maintenance Supplies 48809 Court Omer 721.50 Wage Garnishment 48810 So.Cal.Gas Company 755.62 Natural Gas 48811 Southern California Edison 25.08 Power 48812 SARBS-CWEA 110.00 O&M Meeting Registration 48813 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1.651.12 Motor&Hose Assembly Kit 48814 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 46815 Unocal Corporation 2,434.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 48816 Verizon California 581.32 Telephone Services �l Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT A c Claims Paid From 11/01/02 to 11115/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48817 Verne's Plumbing 337.83 Construction-Purchasing Building Conference Room 48818 Water Environment Federation 148.00 Membership 48819 Wumbus Corporation 1.078.03 Safety Video 48820 Marla Became 875.00 Meetingrfralning Expense Reimbursement 48821 James L.Burror 1.480.02 Meetingrfalning Expense Reimbursement 48822 Deon M.Cenico 301.72 Meetingrfrelning Expense Reimbursement 48823 Richard A.Castillon 403.54 MeelingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 48824 Jerry F.Evangelists 705.13 Meetingrfreining Expense Reimbursement 48825 Larry Gibson 1.265.48 Meelin9/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 48826 Chandra R.Johannesson 153.00 Meelingri mining Expense Reimbursement 48827 Efren G.Lucena 776.56 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 48828 Wendy T.Sevenandl 188.44 Meelingrfraining Expense Reimbursement 48829 Matthew P.Smith 2,383.39 Meeling/fraining Expense Reimbursement 48830 James G.Tintle 260.11 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 48831 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 720.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 48832 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 60.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 48833 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 285.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 48834 County of orange-Auditor Controller 485.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 48835 Chuck M.Forman 1,517.23 Meelirg/fraining Expense Reimbursement 48838 Knoa's Berry Farm 4,653.00 Employee Deposit Transfer 48837 Orange County Sanitation District 24,089.75 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 48838 Postmaster General 200.00 Postage 48839 Systime Computer Corp. 55,300.00 Professional Services-JD Edwards One World XE Implementation Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,510,151.29 Payroll Disbursements 28130-28254 Employee Paychecks $ 187,983.45 Slweakly Payroll 11/13/02 78787-79263 Direct Deposil Slalemenls 800.015.39 Biweekly Payrc0 1111 3/0 2 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 987,998.84 Wire Transfer Pavmenle Lloyds TSB Bank plc S 76.708.40 Letter of Credit Commission for 1992 Refunding COPif-08101102-11/01102 Chase Bank of Texas National Association S 58,464.38 October Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas National Association $ 104,252.88 Societe Generale September Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 239,425.06 Total Claims Paid 11101102-11115102 $ 5,717,575.79 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 11/16/02 to 11/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 48840 American Express S 39.917.71 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies 8 Services 48841 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 72,011.31 Professional Services J-73-2 48842 AKM Consulting Engineers 30,119.34 Professional Services 11-17.3&11-20 48843 Basic Chemical Solutions 25,337.21 Sodium Bisulfite 48844 Carollo Engineers 686.444.94 Professional Services P2-55 48845 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 44,415.40 Cationic Polymer 48846 General Petroleum 25,964.83 Unleaded Gasoline 8 Lubricants 48847 Kemimn Pacific,Inc. 117,672.26 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 48848 Lee 8 Ro, Inc. 54,333.47 Professional Services Pl-93 8 5.29-R7 48849 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 54.870.75 Water Use Efficiency Program MO9-22-99 48850 Pacific Investment Management Co. 150,130.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 48851 Painewebber Incorporated 31,409.06 COP Remarking Agreements 48852 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 163,536.22 Engineering Services J42 8 J-35-1 48853 Pioneer Amens,Inc. 184,627.77 Sodium Hypochlorile 8 Caustic Soda 48854 ScMxing America, Inc. 28,281.75 Pump Supplies 48855 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 166.818.44 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 8 Professional Services J-85 48856 Southern California Edison 86,893.23 Power 48857 Tule RanciuMagan Farms 84.488.96 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 48858 U.S.Peroxide 137,16C27 Hydrogen Peroxide 48859 The Yakima Company 53,992.49 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 48860 Connolly-Pacific Company 1,467,808.00 Construction J-39 4888/ Green Giant Landscape,Inc. 84,127.00 Construction P2-84 48862 J W Contracting Corporation 550,832.00 Construction P2-60 48863 J.F.Shea Construction,Inc. 501,086.04 Construction J-35.2 48864 Manuel Bros.,Inc. 63,000.00 Construction-Fiber Optic Extension at Pit.2 48865 Margate Construction,Inc. 2,074,472.00 Construction P7-37 _ 48866 Oved Dagan Construction Co. 27,886.00 Construction J-90 48867 Southern Contracting Company 221,559.00 Construction J-33-1A 48868 Steve P. Rados,Inc. 504.259.21 Construction 1-24 48869 Union Bank of California 67,537.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 48870 Urbantec Engineering, Inc. 67,711.00 Construction J-56 48871 Sanmina Corporation 26.476.54 Reconciffation User Fee Refund Program 48872 Great American Printing Co. 2.054.47 Paper 48873 Airborne Express 28.93 Air Freight 48874 Airgas-West 10.23 Lab Supplies 48875 Airgas Safely 1,639.12 Safety Supplies 8 Equipment 48876 AIlMed,Inc. 50.94 Computer Supplies 48877 Allied Packing 8 Rubber, Inc. 61.86 Mechanical Supplies 48878 American Red Cross 2.045.00 CPR Training 8 Misc.Supplies 48879 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 1,120.00 Toxicity Testing 48880 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 48881 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 178.08 Telephone Service 48882 ATCC 126.50 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 48883 Baker Tanks 2.626.89 Tank Rentals 8 Fence Berms 48M Bell Land Surveying 14,970.55 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 11/16/02 to 11/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48885 Sondlogistix,L.L.C. 4,800.00 Prof.Sm.-Preparation of Interim Arbitrage Rebate Report Series 2000 COP; 48886 Brinderson Corporation 16.779.00 Professional Services PI-95 48887 Bush&Associates, Inc. 5.860.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25.97 48888 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 10.17 Mechanical Pans,Supplies&Service 48889 California Auto ReBigeration Dist.,lnc. 967.60 Refrigerant 48890 Callrol,Inc. 604.05 Electrical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 48891 Cameron Welding Supply 48.13 Waking Gloves 48892 Cardlpck Fuels 196.19 Direct Vehicle Fueling Services 48893 Cad Warren&Co. 444.24 Insurance Claims Administrator 48894 Ca112Ce11 2,847.46 Communication Equipment 48895 Center for Creative Growth 3,587.00 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 48896 Charles P.Crowley Co. 822.97 Instrument Parts 48897 City of Fountain Valley 20,656.08 Water Use 48898 City of Yorba Linda 512.00 Meeting Room Rental-Joint Management Committee Meeting-SARI Project 48899 Coast Fire Equipment 7,888.12 Service Agreement-Fire Extinguisher Testing,Recharging&Certificatlon 48900 Coast Transmission 1.537.19 Van Pool Vehicle Repairs 48901 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 13,000.00 Professional Services-Safety&Emerg. Response Procedures 48902 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 1.917.83 Computer Maint.Agreemem 48903 Con-Way Western Express 413.31 Freight Charges 48904 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 4,923.79 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46905 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 759.43 Plumbing Supplies 48906 Cooper Energy Services 534.51 Engine Supplies 48907 Corporate Express Imaging 5.962.99 Computer Supplies 48908 Corporate Express 2.528.46 Office Supplies 48909 Cost Containment Solutions 3,692.19 Workers Comp.Services 48910 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 110.55 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 48911 County of Los Angeles 577.03 Refund-Check Issued to OCSD in Error 48912 County Wholesale Electric Co. $37.75 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48913 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Main.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener System 48914 Cylec Industries 319.50 Chemicals 48915 CCP Industries 2,144.85 Janitorial Supplies 48916 CEM Corporation 342.25 Lab Supplies 48917 CWEA Membership 92.00 Membership-Capt.Water Environment Assoc. 48918 Daniel Company,L.L.C. 5,382.11 Mechanical Repairs 48919 David's Tree Service 1.850.00 Tree Maint.Service 48920 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 19,231.22 (8)Latitude Notebooks 48921 Denies,Inc. 1,563.21 Safety Supplies 46922 DlgiPhoto 21.90 Photographic Services 48923 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 169.39 Paint Supplies 48924 DME,Inc. 579.65 Mechanical Supplies 48925 Ecology Cormol Industries 292.00 Hazardous Waste Disposal 48926 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 1,083.20 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 48927 Enchanter,Inc. 5.400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-e-94,Oulfall Inspections&Maintenance 48928 Environmental Resource Association 1.837.59 Lab Parts&Supplies 48929 Executive Software 12,978.49 Software Maint.Agreement 48930 Expertune 764.00 Software Upgrade Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 11/16/02 to 11/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48931 FedEx Corporation 227.97 Air Freight 48932 Fllarsky&Watt,L.L.P. 3,277.50 Professional Services,SPMT Negotiations&Other Misc.Services 48933 Filter Supply Company 2,855.25 Filters 48934 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 12,952.28 Lab Paris&Supplies 48936 Foodcreft Coffee&Refreshment Services 351.50 Meeting Supplies 48936 Foss Environmental 3,881.62 Ferric Chloride Storage Tank Cleaning Services 48937 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 25.43 Paint Supplies 48938 Frys Electronics 1,376.64 Computer Supplies 48939 FLW,Inc. 250.16 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48940 George T.Hall 97.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48941 Golden Bell Products 2,556.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coating of Manholes 48942 W W Grainger,Inc. 108.25 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48943 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 179.99 Janitorial Supplies 48944 Hach c/o Portion Industries 12.891.89 Lab Parts&Supplies 48945 American Sigma,Inc. 6,798.48 Pump Supplies 48946 Harold Primrose Ice 129.50 Ice For Samples 48947 Henry Company-Sealants Division 155.21 Sealant 48948 Hutt,Inc. 667.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48949 The Holman Group 728.46 Employee Assistance Program Premium 48950 Home Depot 250.63 Small Hardware 48951 Hopkins Technical Products 8,231.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48952 Hub Auto Supply 121.05 Truck Parts 48953 Idexa 2.004.15 Lab Parts&Supplies 48954 Imaging Express 398.71 Printer Maintenance 48955 Industrial Distribution Group 1,243.61 Took&Mechanical Supplies 48956 Industrial Fabrics Corp. 8,880.00 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 48957 Intergraph Corporation 12,154.20 Software Maint.Agreement 48958 Intratek Computer,Inc. 1,800.00 Network&Server Maintenance 48959 Irvine Pipe&Supply 138.81 Water Heater 48960 Irvine Ranch Water District 21.28 Water Use 48961 IPI-GrammTech,Inc. 13,612.50 Software Maint.Agreement 48962 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 2,685.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 489W Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 5.104.28 Construction-Repair Pipe Leak at Pit.2 Bleach Facilities 48964 Jay's Catering 103.75 Meeting Expenses 48965 Johnson&Associates.L.L.C. 5.105.11 Professional Services-Meet&Confer Process 48966 Johnstone Supply 963.98 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 48967 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 2,610.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12.9.90 48968 Kelly Paper 539.58 Paper 48969 Ken Thompson,Inc. 1.800.00 Construction-Potholing Existing Utilities at Bitter Point Pump Station 48970 KEC Engineering 9.701.42 Construction-Repair 12-Inch Sewedme at South Coast Drive&Susan St. 48971 KW Communications Consulting 787.50 Professional Services-Bushard Tmnkline Replacement 48972 L&N Uniform Supply Co. 200.42 Printing 48973 Lessons In Leadership 269.00 Compliance Training Registration 48974 Lucci's 344.48 Meeting Expense 48976 Maintenance Technology Corp. 85.34 Mechanical Supplies 48976 Management Technologies 262.00 Renewal of NPOES Ocean Discharge Permit Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 11/16/02 to 11/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 48977 Manaft,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 5,000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 48978 Mc Junkin Cory—Ontario Branch 646.50 Plumbing Supplies 48979 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 2.125.02 Mechanical&Electrical Pans&Supplies 48980 Mm Analytical System 14,055.00 Professional Services-Lab Analysis 48981 Medlin Controls Co. 178.42 Instrument Supplies 48982 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 1,742.50 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 48983 Mid Cities Honda 2,644.18 Portable Generator 48984 Mission Union Service 4,091.55 Uniform Rentals 48985 Mitchell Repair Information Co. 61.85 Publications-Shop Manuals 48986 Moreland&Associates 4,921.35 Auditing Services MO 3.8-95 48987 MDS Consulting 4,855.80 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 48988 Nasco 38.49 Lab Parts&Supplies 48989 Newark Eledronics 667.79 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48990 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,493.60 Hydraulic Oil 48991 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,086.17 Once Supplies 48992 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 569.34 Janitorial Supplies 48993 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 107.42 Electrical Pans&Supplies 48994 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 734.52 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 48995 Oxygen Service Company 639.92 Specialty Gases 48996 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 23.891.70 Filter Media&Related Services 48997 Pacific Bell 67.43 Telephone Services 48988 Pacific Bell Internet Services 329.00 Internet Service 48999 Pacific Mechanical Supply 220.93 Plumbing Supplies 490DO Pacific Parts&Controls 832.86 Electrical Supplies 49001 Parker Hannifin Corporation 279.30 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 49002 Parker Supply Company 6,862.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49003 Pans Unlimited 74.43 Automotive Paris&Supplies 49004 PenValve 550.83 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 49005 Hach Go Portion Industries 210.34 Lab Supplies 49D06 Primavera Systems, Inc. 2.402.93 Software MSinl. 49D07 Projects Partners 10,398.45 Temporary Employment Services 490M PC Mall Gov.,Inc. 1,790.79 Computer Software 49009 PCS Express 125.60 Courier Service 49010 Quest Software 517.20 Computer Maintenance Agreement-Server 49011 Radius Maps 1,500.00 Radius Map&Ownership Listings 49012 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2.300.12 Trash Removal 49013 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 481 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49014 RPM Electric Motors 1,193.73 Motor 49015 Saxon Engineering, Inc. 7,700.00 Construction-Replace Manhole Frames&Covers&Grade at Fairview&Bear 49016 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 2.380.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 49017 Sensomx 326.53 Instrument Supplies 49018 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 696.65 Tods 49019 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 173.16 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 49020 SARWG,co,Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 110.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 49021 Supeloo, Inc. 870.69 tab Parts&Supplies 49022 Skater,Inc. 424.27 Lab Parts&Supplies Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT B A Claims Paid From 11/16/02 to 11/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 49023 SkillPath On-Site 7,650.00 On-Site Training 49024 Smith Pipe&Supply 718.58 Landscape Irrigation Supplies 49025 Smith-Emery Company 222.00 Soil Testing MO 7-13-94 49026 So.Cal.Gas Company 23,541.79 Natural Gas 49027 South Central Coastal Information Center 180.D0 CalTrans Encroachment Permit 49028 Southern California Edison 2.255.24 Power 49029 Sparkletts 1,718.52 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 49030 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 1.465.20 Carpet Cleaning Services 40031 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 180.00 Copier Maintenance 49032 Strata International, Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 49033 Summit Steel 85&71 Metal 49034 Symcas-TSG 1,384.18 Computer Maintenance Agreement-VAX SCADA System 49035 SAWPA 2.000.00 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Task Force Contribution 49036 SPX Valves&Control 4,939.05 Valves 49037 Taylor-Dunn 718.30 Electric Can Pans 49038 Telog Instruments,Inc. 539.85 Analog Voltage Recorder 49039 Tenninix International Co. 325.00 Pest Control 49040 Ten Tech,Inc. 13.830.00 Professional Services-Ocean Monitoring Program&NPDES Permit Renewal 49041 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 456.58 Blosolids Analysis 49042 Osprey Marine Management 1,640.00 Lab Analyses 49043 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 3,713.47 Mechanical Supplies 49044 Thompson Publishing Group 298.00 Publication 49045 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1.280.00 Elevator Maintenance 49046 Daily Pilot 56.25 Notices&Ads 49047 Todd Anderson 3.780.00 Professional Services J-85 4904E Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 115.56 Irrigation Water Leak Repair 40N9 Truesdail Laboratories,Inc. 1,235.00 Lab Services 49050 Ultra Scientific 111.48 Lab Parts&Supplies 49051 United Parcel Service 1,207,45 Paroel Services 49052 UC Regents 2,380.00 Human Resources Training Registration 49053 Vallen Safety Supply Company 2,622.31 Safely Supplies 49054 Vapex,Inc. 3,833.90 Maintenance Services J-71-8 49055 Verimn California 3,859.34 Telephone Services 49056 Vision Service Plan 7,542.36 Vision Service Premium 49057 Vonex Industries,Inc. 473.50 Door Repair 49058 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 7.430.61 Lab Pans&Supplies 49059 The Wackenhut Corporation 4.117.97 Security Guards 49060 Walden&Associates 5,120.32 Professional Services-Big Canyon Trunk Sewer 49061 Waste Markets Corp. 22,318.19 Malnt.Agreement-Gr9&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mafl.Removal 49062 Waxie Sanitary Supply 106.73 Janitorial Supplies 49063 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 649.95 Safely Supplies 49064 WEF 260.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 49065 WEF Publications 49.98 Publication 49066 Xerox Corporation 6.050.43 Fax&Copier Leases 49067 Zymark Corporation 4,500.00 Lab Maintenance Service-Zymate Robotic System 49068 California Bank&Trust 24,617.00 Construction J-33.1,Retention Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 11/16/02 to 11/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 49M Mark A.Esquer 1,203.88 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 49070 David R.Heinz 113.15 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 49071 John Kavoklis 106.44 Meelingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 49072 Julie A.Matsumoto 1,325.00 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 49073 James W.Matte 913.22 Meeting/rrsining Expense Reimbursement 49074 Peter M.Morrison 602.07 Meetingri mining Expense Reimbursement 49075 George L.Robertson 101.01 Meeting/Rraining Expense Reimbursement 49076 Wendy T.Sevenandl 164.00 Meeting/Rrsining Expense Reimbursement 49077 Frank R.Steiger 1,809.79 MeelingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 49078 Anodyne, Inc. 1,426.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49079 Ashford,Welter H. 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49080 Bening,Mary Jo 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49081 Beam,Ila F. 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 4DD82 Blackley,Terry or Karen S. 1,142.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49083 The Boeing Company 7,138.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 490M Brewer,Gregory 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49D85 Cal-Aurum Industries 1,802.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49086 Chou,Chiu Shiang or Kang Hsi 2,050.15 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49087 Continuous Coating 2,751.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49088 Dept.of Fish 8 Game 154.00 Coastal Development Permit Fee 49089 DEssecker,Dal R. 890.47 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49090 German,Brenan C.or Lon 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49091 Gitlings,Darrell J. 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49092 Jensen,Regina 890.47 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49093 Johnson, Russell P. 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49094 Kamikubo,Shannon 253.42 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49095 Kawabe,Glen or Dianne M. 1.233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49096 Knight.Helen 82.04 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49097 Loya.Diane 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49098 Markey,Rodger or Janice 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49099 Marslers Laurentz R.or Marione B. 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49100 Mogan Kenneth and Robin 9,229.44 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49101 Multi-Fineline Eleclronix,Inc. 7,016.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49102 Orange County Sanitation District 996.66 Petty Cash Reimb. 49103 Peterson,Cade or Floyd 003.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49104 Powdercoat Services 78A5 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49105 PCE Industry,Inc. 105.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49106 Santa Ana Plating 226.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49107 Smith,Chad"or Julie L. 165.69 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49108 Solberg,Martin 003.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49109 Solder Station One,Inc. 1.079.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49110 SDC Circuits 25.99 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49111 Teesdale,Robert D. 165.69 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49112 TTM Technologies,Inc. 9,992.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49113 Universal Circuits,Inc. 6.780.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 49114 Wang,Shu 980.29 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 4F nr Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT B e Claims Paid From 11/16/02 to 11/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 49115 Werfieo,Jamb 1,233.71 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49116 Zokelbach,Max 168.51 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 49117 Ken Thompson,Inc. 234213.00 Constructim-Sewer fine Construction at Tustin 8 Prospect Ave. 49118 Orange County Sanitation District 608.980.26 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 49119 Southern California Edison 66.815.13 Power 49120 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 96,148.15 Legal Services MO 7-26.95 49121 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 6274.04 Software Upgrade 49122 Airline Safety 2.763.07 Safety Supplies&Equipment 49123 Association of Compost Producers 10,000.00 Membership 49124 ABB Automation, Inc. 359.65 Instrument Calibration&Certification 49125 AT&T Universal Biller 1,781.71 Telephone Service 49126 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 101.43 Telephone Service 49127 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,654.39 Cellular Telephone Service 49128 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 49129 California Comfort Vans 4,961.89 Interior Upgrade-Vehicle 465 49130 Career Track 99.00 Engineering Training Registration 49131 Copelm Capital, Inc. 58200 Copier Lease 49132 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 49133 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 396.06 Electrical Supplies 49134 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 3,750.05 Plumbing Supplies 49135 CALPERLA 1,000.00 Human Resources Meeting Registration 49136 CSMFO Annual Conference 675.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 49137 Elsevier Science 1.079.00 Publication 49138 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 8252.08 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 49139 Pacific States Chemical,Inc. 4,009.09 Hydrochloric Acid 49140 Court Order 525.00 Wage Gamishmenl 49141 Five Star Metals.Inc. 326.51 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49142 Franchise Tax Board 332.83 Wage Garnishment 49143 Hasler,Inc. 216.00 Equipment Rental-Mail Meter 49144 City of Huntington Beach 15,564.60 Water Use 49145 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 152.54 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49146 Intl.Union of Oper.Erg.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,262.44 Dues Deduction 49147 Irvine Ranch Water District 33.45 Water Use 49148 Kings County Tax Collector 11,171.76 Property Taxes 49149 Liebed Cassidy Whitmore 1.250.00 Professional Services-Personnel Rules&Regulations 49150 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 746.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49151 Moody's Investors Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 49152 National Bond&Trust 1.462.57 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 49153 Nall.Ind.of Governmental Purchasing 1,080.00 Human Resources Training Registration 49154 Orange County Sheriff 534.18 Wage Garnishment 49155 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 305.83 Lab Parts&Supplies 49156 OCEA 506.11 Dues Deduction 49157 Pacific Bell 1,322.28 Telephone Services 49158 Court Order 40.00 Wage Ganishment 49159 Panametrics 5,101.50 Instrument Pads&Supplies 49160 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 11/16/02 to 11/30102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 49161 Peace Officers Council of CA 1.143.00 Dues Deduction 40152 PenValve 3,018.04 Plumbing Supplies 49163 Quest,J.D.Edwards Users Group 1.400.00 Membership 49164 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 267.04 Water Use 49165 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 510.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49166 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 49167 SoOView Computer Products 421.11 Computer Supplies 49168 Summit Steel 506.00 Metal 49169 SWRCB Accounting Office 21,000.00 NPDES Annual Permit Fee 49170 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.777.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 49171 United Way 205.D0 Employee Contributions 49172 Verizon California 1.030.54 Telephone Services 49173 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 758.39 Meelingri mining Expense Reimbursement 49174 Ronald L.Dewitt,Jr. 143.26 MeelingfTmining Expense Reimbursement 49175 James R.Harris 225.54 Meelingri mining Expense Reimbursement 49176 Chuck Hodge 479.26 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 49177 Vladimir A.Kogan 786.56 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 49178 Michael D. Moore 152.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 49179 Fred J.O'Brien 910.24 Meetingrrminin9 Expense Reimbursement 49100 Gary A.Pons 253.77 MeetingR2ining Expense Reimbursement 49161 Krie,Terry 975.56 Employee Computer Loan Program 49182 Renescu,Adrian 2,507.43 Employee Computer Loan Program 49183 Orange County Water District 523,568.62 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96&J-36 Total Payroll Disbursements 10,237,718.58 Payroll Disbursements 28255.28358 Employee Paychecks $ 175,251.13 Biweekly Payroll 11/27/02 28359-28359 Interim Paycheck 284.43 OCEA Dues Refund 79264-79735 Direct Deposil Statements 924,482.25 Biweekly Payroll 11/27/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,100,017.81 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA.N.A. $ 316 138.71 November Interest Payment on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments 318,138.71 Total Claims Paid 11/16IO2.11130/02 $ 11,853,873.10 6 —r, Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT B BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mee[mg Date TGBd.a/ooGr .Dir. wt AGENDA REPORT Item Number item Number 9(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF DISTRICT'S 2002 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-21, Adoption of District's 2002 Conflict of Interest Code, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 00-21. SUMMARY Please see attached memorandum from General Counsel dated December 3, 2002. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. General Counsel Memo Gftoq,xlaUWda�dNg Rap 'QW2 Boars Aeon"Reedbllmmern No G fliw a In,e,eaLdm R... vmree Page 1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: December 3, 2002 RE: Resolution re Adoption of District's Revised Conflict of Interest Code The Resolution adopting a revised Conflict of Interest Code is presented to you as essentially a housekeeping measure, in keeping with implemented Regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission. The effect of the Resolution is simply to revise the District's list of Designated Employees for the filing of Statements of Economic Interests. The changes are primarily due to classification name changes and the addition and deletion of several positions to the organizational chart which have occurred as a result of the recent Classification and Compensation Study. It is recommended that this Resolution be adopted, bringing the District's local Code into conformance with these Regulations. Upon adoption, it will be submitted to the Orange County Board of Supervisors, as the Code-reviewing body, for its action to approve the Code. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:pj cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Ms. L. Tomko Ms. P. Kyle 4aenda DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, November20, 2002 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, November 20, 2002 at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Shirley McCracken, Chair Don Hughes Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Ryal Wheeler Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMITS Committee Jennifer Cabral Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair Mike Moore Brian Donahue, Incoming PDC Committee Chair Randy Fuhrman Director Jim Ferryman, Incoming OMTS Jan Vandersloot Committee Chair Joan Irvine Smith Paul Mosley Directors Absent: Larry Porter Brian Brady,Chairman, FAHR Committee Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Greg Mathews, Administrative Services Manager Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Gary Streed, Director of Finance Sonja Wassgren, Communications Principal Public Information Specialist Jim Colston, ECM Legal and Regulatory Affairs Specialist Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Jan Vandersloot asked that the most recent version of the permit application transmittal letter be provided to the Directors so that they are aware of the recent changes. Larry Porter addressed the need for early determination of selected process to reach 30130 standards. Randy Fuhrman Minutes of the Steering Committee , Page 2 November 20, 2002 submitted a copy of a letter he will be presenting to the Board on various items on the agenda, including Informed policy decisions, looking at the overall biosolids picture, Including a fitness center in the administration building expansion to improve and encourage employee health, and approving the Ocean Discharge Permit application. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS The minutes of the regular October 23, 2002 and the Special November 7, 2002 Steering Committee meetings were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Shirley McCracken thanked retiring Director Pat McGuigan for her support and leadership over the past eight years. She also announced that Jim Ferryman will be OMTS Committee Chair and Brian Donahue has agreed to be PDC Committee Chair. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson announced that he would like to combine two agenda items, 6.A and 8.E, together as they are closely related. A. California Leaislative Agenda for2003 (and Item B.E.. Washington, DC Funding Strateav) Mr.Anderson provided a history on what initiatives the agency has supported in the past and outlined those that could Impact the District in the coming year. Discussions are underway to amend Prop. 218 that would Include urban runoff fees in the exempt category. During the 2002 legislative session, an ACA was approved for the March 2004 ballot that could, beginning in 2006-07, transfer 1 percent of the General Fund to an Infrastructure Fund if the State General Funds increase by 4 percent after inflation. Staff anticipates working with CalRac to build support in Sacramento for this amendment. We Will also attempt to change state law so that the CA Regional Water Quality Control Board would be the state-wide regulator for biosolids in a systematic and scientifically-based manner. Taking away local control will be a challenge. Tom Woodruff mentioned that both the state and EPA are going ahead with biosolids studies and this may be the time to move ahead. A coordinated cooperative effort with other wastewater treatment agencies is required. Bob Ghirelli addressed the action Item to approve a budget of$200,000 for a federal advocacy program, of which$180,000 would go towards a consultant contract and the other$20,000 would cover staff costs, travel, etc. A list of organizations and firms that provide some type of legislative lobbying was reviewed. About$190,000 was spent on this year on these efforts, with another$92,000 on specific legislative bills. In the past we have not sought grant funding for our construction program, but the Directors have asked staff to consider this alternative. Part of the scope of the ENS Resources contract is to provide an estimate of funds that might be available to the District. Staff was directed to prepare a report for the Directors that would outline a Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 November 20, 2002 budget for 2003-04,define the short-term strategy and a goal for how much money we would like to obtain, and provide an estimate of grant assistance available. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: To recommend to the Board that the contract with ENS Resources be approved. Director Ferryman questioned whether Scott Baugh was the most effective representative given the current political climate. B. Committee Charters and Related Handbook for Directors Greg Mathews, Administrative Services Manager, described the handbook that is under development for Directors. It would provide information on what it means to be a director of the Sanitation District and provide reference material and instructions. A draft manual will be presented to the Directors at the December meeting and the final will be available for the new directors as they join the Board. The Steering Committee members did not make any changes to the items outlined. C. Updates were provided on: 1. Achievina 30130 Secondary Treatment Standards Staff continues to move forward with improvements to the secondary treatment process. Operations produced 62139 effluent quality, down from the 72151 produced prior to July 17, 2002. Engineering continues to work on the CIP verification. Staff continues to work with the Regional Board and others on the details of establishing an independent expert panel to review the secondary facilities schedule. The panel members must be registered professional civil and structural engineers and construction professionals who can review the schedule based on their experience in the industry. 2. Biosolids This issue was not discussed. 3. Disinfection Staff continues to get excellent results. 'Kills'are well within our operational objectives that result in concentrations at the edge of the zone of initial dilution that meet the California Ocean Plan limits. Temporary facilities are being converted to meet redundancy requirements that will be able to meet our needs for the next 3-5 years. Engineering is moving forward wfth design of a permanent disinfection system. D. Consider the future of the Communications Division Mr. Anderson reported that we are actively recruiting for a Communications Manager to replace Lisa Murphy. The position is a member of the Executive Management Team to ensure staff and the public understand what we are doing. He outlined some of the expectations and qualifications that are needed at this time. There has been considerable interest in the position. Sonja Wassgren made a presentation on the responsibilities of the division. One of the major tasks is to provide customer service to our construction management staff. She described the steps they have to take for larger construction projects to provide the necessary communications tools for the public. It is anticipated that there will be five large, six medium sized and eight smaller construction projects in the next year that they will be supporting. She also described some of the issues that have impacted the staff, including the problems with the SARI project Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 November 20, 2002 Ms. Wassgren announced that the District's website has been improved and gave a brief demonstration of some of the changes. This should be available the first part of December. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported on a meeting held yesterday between EPA and the local environmental groups. The District was invited to the meeting. The environmental group had requested that they be allowed to sit on the expert panel to make sure they were kept informed throughout the schedule review process. Mr. Woodruff reported that EPA has a national policy that negotiations have to be confidential. After terms of the permit have been negotiated, there are opportunities for public comment before the permit is issued. General Counsel Woodruff announced a need for a closed session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1), has arisen since the publishing of the Agenda. The item was agendized for open session. The closed session is necessary and will discuss possible litigation in view of the District being advised earlier this date on issues related to the SARI Relocation invoices to SAW PA. It was moved, seconded and approved to move Item 8.D. to closed session (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-G) A. A Look Ahead-2003 Committee Meeting Schedule In order to provide early notification to the directors and staff,a preliminary meeting schedule has been created. January and August will be dark for the OMTS and PDC Committees. Because of labor negotiations,the FAHR Committee will meet in January and be dark in August. Other meeting dates may need to change to accommodate holidays. The Committee agreed with staff recommended changes. B. Workshop for New Directors Wednesday, February 19, has been established as the date for a workshop for new and returning directors to discuss. It coincides with the FAHR Committee that was also moved to that night to avoid conflict with Lincoln's Birthday, which is a District holiday. It was decided that the FAHR Committee would begin at 5 p.m. and the workshop at 7 p.m. Three areas will be covered: operations of the District, basic ocean science and ocean monitoring and a review of the CIP. C. Low Interest Loans for Converting Residences from Septic Tanks to Sewer Connections It was agreed to move discussion of this Rem to the December 18,2002 meeting. D. Status of SAW PA invoicing Problems This item was moved to closed session/ E. Washington DC Funding Strateav This item was discussed under Report of General Manager. F. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in December were reviewed. G. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. e Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 November 20, 2002 (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Director Norm Eckenrode asked that the Scott Baugh contract be brought to the full Board for consideration. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 18, 2002 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 18, 2002 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:32 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Section 54956.9, to discuss possible litigation re SARI Relocation project. Consideration of the General Manager's Annual Performance Evaluation and Compensation and conference with District's Labor Negotiations (Human Resources Representative and General Manager) re salaries, benefits, terms and conditions of employment for At-will Contracts with Executive Management Team was moved to the December 18 Steering Committee meeting. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:55 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. S itted by: � Jepr6ftappan Steefing Committee Secretary Q'Ixp.tlleLpemleWeervq Cwnmittee102WaN112Vb3 P ftsc Mi,ubs.Ox D raft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, December 4, 2002 — 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 4, 2002, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Paul Walker, Chair pro tem Blake Anderson, General Manager Don Bankhead Bob Oaten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Debbie Cook Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Tony Kawashima Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Tod Ridgeway Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Ed Torres, Air Quality & Special Projects Manager Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Marc Dubois, Contracts/Purchasing Manager Greg Mathews, Administrative Services Manager Directors Absent: Doug Stewart, Asset Management Manager Mike Heinz, Senior Scientist James M. Ferryman, Chair Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Anna Piercy Others: Bill Kennedy Lynn Norton Jan Vandersloot (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Due to the absence of Chair Jim Ferryman, Director Paul Walker was appointed Chair pro tem for this meeting only. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair pro tern had no report. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee ` Page 2 December 4, 2002 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, briefly reviewed items that would need to be watched closely in 2003: (1)The possible state reduction of the District's ad valorem tax revenue, which is approximately$35 million, due to the state's budget shortfall; (2) Development of a legislative proposal to modify Proposition 218 to provide an exemption for fees associated with urban runoff treatment programs(3)A public infrastructure funding ballot measure that is scheduled to appear on the March 2004 ballot state-wide, which earmarks a part of the general fund towards public infrastructure improvements; and, (4)The possible expansion of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's oversight authority as it relates to biosolids management programs. A special board workshop will be held on February 19, 2003. at 7:00 p.m. for new and returning Directors to review basic operations, marine monitoring program, status of the capital improvement program and a review of the construction schedule to achieve"30/30 treatment" standards. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the November 6, 2002 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. b. OMTS02-70 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report,which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. C. OMTS02-71 Receive and file Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance,financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. d. OMTS02-72 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Microfrltration Demonstration Project Report, Phase I, prepared by Carollo Engineers, dated December 2002. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 6(a)through(d) under Consent Calendar. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS02-73 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 101322 issued to U.S. Peroxide for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. C-2002-90,for an additional amount of$600,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,426,036, for the contract period ending June 30, 2003. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. µ Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 December 4, 2002 b. OMTS02-74 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to PIxelPushers, Inc. for Online Technical Specification Reference Library, Specification No. M-2002-100R, to provide for software and implementation services, in an amount not to exceed $186,470 plus tax. Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology, reported that the project was a combined effort of the Purchasing &Warehousing Division and Information Technology Department. Marc Dubois gave a brief overview of how the implementation of the project would assist staff in development of specifications for future projects. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. OMTS02-75 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file External Inspection of 120" and 78"Ocean Outfalls Report, prepared by Undersea Graphics, Inc. dated January 2002. The Directors viewed a short video of the exterior condition and sea life around both outfalls. Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager, and Mike Heinz, Senior Scientist, responded to Directors'questions regarding the results of the inspection and how inspections were conducted. It was suggested by some of the Directors that the video be shown at a regular Board meeting. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly pitied to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. d. OMTS02-76 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1) Receive and file Asset Management Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis prepared by Parsons Infrastructure and Technology, Inc., dated November 2002; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate a contract amendment with Parson's Infrastructure and Technology, Inc.for the Asset Management Program, Phase 2, to be awarded by the Board of Directors at a future meeting. Doug Stewart,Asset Management Program Manager, reported on the findings of Phase 1, and described the steps to be taken for development and implementation of Phase 2. Motion: Moved, seconded and duty carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. u Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee ' Page 4 Deoember4, 2002 (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS There were none. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology, reported there has been a rise of cyber-terrorism concerns. A review was recently conducted on 24 governmental agencies,of which 70%failed. He stated that the levels of security in place for the District's system are well established. However, a complete security audit will be conducted in January 2003. The process will provide for an annual review and monthly checks. Updates will be provided throughout the year. The District's new website is scheduled to be unveiled in mid-December. The OMTS Committee will be given a demonstration of the new site at their next meeting in February. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, distributed an updated report to the Directors on meeting secondary treatment standards and gave a brief report on the results. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported that the ocean permit application was submitted that day. Copies would be provided at the December le Board meeting, as well as placed on the District's website for public review. A CD-Rom is also available for interested parties. (12) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 December 4, 2002 (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for February 5, 2003 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Submitted by: 4'a� � . Penny M. I le Operations, Maintenanc nd Technical Services Committee Secretary GAWp.dtMadmWBSX0MTM120402 draft minuW.dw OMTS COMMITTEE Meebag Date TOBd.or .Dir. 12/04/02 wte/oz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number orms02-72 I2ccI Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Air Quality& Special Projects Manager SUBJECT: MICROFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: PHASE 1 FINAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Final Report, Phase 1 Microfiltration Demonstration Project, prepared by Carollo Engineers, dated December 2002. SUMMARY • In June 2001, the Board authorized an agreement with Carollo Engineers to design, construct and operate a large microfiltration pilot facility at Plant No. 2 treating primary effluent for ocean discharge. The objective of the microfiltration research (Phase 1) effort was to demonstrate process performance, reliability, and obtain operating cost data for the updated Strategic Plan. • Microfiltration research is being performed because it is a promising technology that is being considered, along with traditional technologies, to achieve secondary treatment standards. • District staff is currently developing plans that will outline the schedule to achieve secondary treatment standards. District staff will use the completed Phase I work and the currently authorized Phase II work to develop secondary treatment alternatives. • The Phase I microfiltration research was completed in October 2002. Portions of the research were completed early for Engineering to use for the July 17, 2002 Board of Directors' secondary treatment decision. The final report describes the equipment being evaluated; the test methods used and contain conclusions and recommendations. Key conclusions and recommendations from this research are listed below: Major Report Conclusions: • Microfiltration can reliably produce an essentially solids- and bacteria-free effluent. 1 y J • Microfiltration cannot remove the biochemical oxygen demand to the 30/30- effluent standard adopted by the Board in July 2002. Soluble BOD remains at 50-60 mg/L. • Assuming that the solids backwash (recycle)from the microfiltration process can be treated with traditional technology, the operating and capital costs for microfiltration are comparable to activated sludge treatment. • Microfiltration offers several advantages compared to activated sludge treatment, including smaller footprint for the facilities, less energy use, less solids for disposal, and less odors and air emissions. • Microfiltration, in parallel combination with other secondary treatment technologies, remains a candidate technology for some portion of the secondary treatment train. The major features of the Phase II Microfiltration Research are: • Perform larger scale research on the microfiltration solids backwash treatment technology to develop accurate capital and O&M costs for the backwash treatment technology. • Expand the microfiltration research to trial pretreatment technologies that will reduce the solids loading on the microfilter for the purpose of reducing overall microfiltration capital and O&M cost. • Expand the microfiltration research to test technologies to improve biochemical oxygen demand (SOD) removal rates. • At their September 2002 Meeting, the Board approved an agreement with Carollo Engineers to conduct a Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Study to address the recommendations contained in the Phase I Report. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No new authorization of expenditures is being requested at this time. A summary of the project budget is listed below: Project Description Budget Pilot-Scale Stud $ 300,000 Phase I: Demonstration-Scale Study $1.575,000 Phase II: Demonstration-Scale Study $1,655,000 Total Project Cost $3,530,000 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Board approved budget on 9/25/02.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) 2 _yY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENT Final Report: Microfiltration Demonstration Project— Phase I Executive Summary EMT/RJO:pjm GA.p.dla%agendax0MrS0002t20g2 OMrS Agenda ReportsX02-72.Cardlo Engineers.doc 3 e ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MICROFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, PHASE I TESTING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared by Carollo Engineers November 18, 2002 PURPOSE In 1998, Carollo Engineers (Carollo) conceived a novel wastewater treatment concept that includes microfiltration (MF) of primary effluent in a non-aerobic biological treatment step, reverse osmosis (RO), and an anaerobic stabilization process to produce reuse quality water. Pilot testing of this process at the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) was successfully completed in December 2000. The pilot testing was undertaken at Treatment Plant No. 1. Because of the success of the pilot testing, OCSD hired Carollo to carry out a turn-key demonstration project involving the use of microfiltration (MF)to treat primary effluent, in a non-biological treatment step for ocean discharge. This approach would provide an alternative to the conventional approach for producing a high quality effluent suitable for discharge to the ocean. The purpose of the demonstration testing is: • to confirm the pilot plant performance, • to demonstrate the capability of MF treatment of primary effluent at a larger scale to produce a high quality effluent that could be discharged to the ocean without further treatment, and • To update the cost estimates for the treatment alternative compared with conventional secondary treatment activated sludge process followed by disinfection. The demonstration plant began operation in December 2001. Phase I of the testing was completed at the end of September 2002 and is summarized in this Report. Phase I focused on comparing the hydraulic and rejection performance of the MF plant with what was obtained during the pilot plant testing. Phase ll, which was recently approved by OCSD, will focus on further assessing methods for thickening the solids in MF backwash water, pretreatment methods for reduction of soluble BOD in the MF permeate stream and further approaches to optimize the MF process to make it even more cost effective. This work will form part of a future Report. c:a y.dteegendewnars Om 2 onars Agenda Re AS02-]2.1.dx 1 BACKGROUND OCSD presently has two ocean outfalls, a longer 120-inch diameter deepwater outfall and a shorter 78-inch diameter outfall, for disposal of treated wastewater. OCSD uses the longer 120-inch outfall for regular discharge of treated wastewater to the ocean.The 78-inch outfall is designated for emergency use only, since it discharges closer to the shore. OCSD is currently operating under a 301(h)waiver from the US EPA that allows it to discharge a blend of approximately fifty percent primary and fifty percent secondary treated wastewater through the 120-inch diameter ocean outfall. The existing ocean discharge permit expires in June 2003. OCSD must apply for a new discharge permit by December2002. There is currently significant pressure from various community groups for OCSD to discontinue its current practice of discharging less than full secondary treated effluent and move towards full secondary treatment for the entire flow. In July 2002, the OCSD Board agreed to move forward with implementation of treatment facilities to improve the quality of all effluent discharged from the OCSD plants to meet Secondary Treatment standards. In addition, OCSD also elected to embark on an effluent bacterial reduction program. This program will significantly reduce the number of bacteria discharged to the ocean, such that the objectives of the CalWomia Ocean Plan (Near Shore Zone) are met at the point of discharge after initial dilution with seawater. At average flowrate conditions the diffuser section of the 120-inch outfall will achieve about 100 times dilution with seawater. POTENTIAL APPLICATION AND BENEFITS OF NON-BIOLOGICAL MF AT OCSD The typical way in which Secondary Effluent standards are achieved is by using conventional secondary treatment approaches, such as activated sludge treatment This technology is about 80-years old and has a number of environmental impacts. These include a large footprint for aeration basins and clarifiers, significant energy requirements for aeration, production of a large amount of biomass (waste sludge)that requires treatment and then disposal, and downstream disinfection steps prior to ocean discharge. MF, on the other hand, is a modem technology growing in popularity in the USA. PAF allows physical removal of solids and bacteria without the need for an aerobic biological treatment step and chemical disinfection. In addition, MF has a smaller footprint, requires significantly less energy, and does not produce additional biological sludge. Thus, an alternative to conventional secondary treatment is to treat primary effluent with MF and discharge the treated water through the 120-inch outfall. Based on the very low levels of coliform bacteria observed in the MF product during the pilot study, it is conceivable that microfiltered water could potentially be discharged through the 78-inch outfall as well. If this could be achieved, it would delay the need for future new outfall capacity. Gb .ftl mnd.Ohns� 2onrts Ag m.aeon -72.1.m 2 Based on the performance evaluation during Phase I and preliminary cost estimates, the benefits of MF technology to OCSD are summarized below: Cost Savings Benefits • Lower estimated total cost compared to the secondary treatment activated sludge/disinfection alternative, with the potential for major cost reduction in the future as this application of MF technology matures. • Lower energy usage (60 percent less than activated sludge) • Potential to be self sufficient in terms of energy production from biogas, due to high biogas production and lower energy requirements, • Greater potential for automation due to absence of a biological process. • Significantly less biosolids production and therefore fewer trucks to transport sludge for disposal and less disposal land required. • The possibility of moving to large-scale water reclamation at lower cost. Having MF treatment in place producing a high quality product water allows the potential for moving directly to even higher quality reclaimed water for groundwater injection, by adding reverse osmosis (RO)downstream. This would eliminate construction of activated sludge facilities for future phases of the GWR project. Such an approach would require the current regulations to be modified to include use of a non-oxidized feed water. • Potential planned use of 78-inch outfall avoiding future construction of a third outfall as flows increase. Water Quality Benefits • Better reduction of bacteria and viruses than conventional secondary treatment, which would enable the California Ocean Plan discharge standards to be met at the outfall without chemical disinfection. • Product water quality that is largely independent of variations in feed water quality, leading to a consistent quality of product water for discharge. • A viable treatment alternative either with or without a 301(h)waiver. Clean Water Act discharge standards for BOD5(30 mg/L)can be met by blending with secondary effluent from existing facilities in the short term. Other BOD removal alternatives are currently being investigated as part of the Phase 11 investigations. Sustainability Benefits • Smaller footprint (30 percent the size of aeration basins), less land requirement and easier to implement within the District's existing facilities. • Lower odor potential. • Lower energy usage and potential to be self sufficient in terms of energy production from biogas. • Significantly less biosolids production and therefore fewer trucks to transport sludge for disposal and less disposal land required. G1w dtaUg Mn �OMIS402 02 OWS Agenda Repodeb2-72.1.dw 3 • Less worker risk associated with exposure to chemicals for disinfection, fewer chemical delivery trucks, less noise and air pollution. • Lower emissions of volatile organic compounds which impact air quality. • Possibility to move to large-scale water reclamation at lower cost. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION During Phase I, the demonstration project was operated in three separate periods. The first period (December 2001 to January 2002)was used to determine reasonable membrane flux and recovery conditions to be used during Period 2. Period 2 lasted from January 2002 through mid-May 2002. During this period the plant operating conditions remained unchanged, the objective being to obtain a consistent set of performance data for the permit application. During Period 3 (through the end of September 2002), some changes were made and testing of suitable backwash treatment technologies began. To provide credibility to the demonstration project, a Blue Ribbon Panel was formed (see Table ES.1). The members of this panel provided input to the Project Test Plan and reviewed and commented on the results that were obtained during Period 2. Two workshops were held with the Panel members and OCSD staff to obtain input to the project. Table ES.1 Blue Ribbon Panel Panel Member Area of Expertise Dr. Steve Dentel Solids Treatment Dr. Vic Leipzig Environmental Mr. Kris Lindstrom Environmental Dr. George Tchobano lous Process Technologies Dr. Mark Wiesner Membrane Technolo ies Summary of Performance Results from Period 2 The demonstration project confirmed the good performance results that were obtained by the MF membranes treating primary effluent at pilot scale. During Period 2, the plant was operated at a product water flowrate of 194 gpm (equivalent to a membrane flux of 13 gfd), and a backwash interval of 12 minutes. An intensive sampling and chemical analysis program was undertaken during this period; both grab and composite samples were collected. In addition to regular process related analyses, MF product water samples were analyzed for 159 different organic compounds, a number of which have maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)for drinking water. G.- .p, a pendaWMr�oz,2ao2 Dears AWnda Repro W2.n.t.d 4 ` The product water from the MF plant was of a very high quality. Excellent bacteriological removal was achieved. 4.3 log and 4.5 log removal for total and fecal coliform bacteria, respectively, as well as 2.1 log removal of coliphage (an indicator for virus removal). The bacterial removal confirms that no additional disinfection step would be required downstream of an MF plant in order to achieve OCSD's new bacterial reduction goals during discharge to the ocean. In fact, the MF product water only needs to be diluted about five times in order to meet the California Ocean Plan (Near Shore Zone) objectives, and could therefore meet such objectives after discharge through the shorter 78-inch outfall. As expected, excellent solids removal was achieved by the MF membranes. The average suspended solids (TSS) concentration was 2.5 mg/L. The soluble portion of the BOD present in the primary effluent passes through MF membranes. The average BOD (all soluble) in the MF product water was 59 mg/L, similar to the results obtained during the pilot test work. Such a BOD concentration would be too high to discharge directly to the ocean, following the Board's resolution in July 2002. However, the new treatment objective of 30 mg/L of BOD could be achieved by blending with secondary treated effluent from existing OCSD's plants. Assuming secondary effluent with a BOD of 20 mg/L, MF product water would need to be blended in a ratio of 1:3 to achieve a combined BOD of 30 mg/L. As a longer term solution to reducing the MF product water BOD, Phase II of the demonstration project will investigate an anaerobic pretreatment step upstream of the MF plant. Table ES.2 compares MF product quality with effluent quality obtained using other treatment processes. As observed from Table ES.2, MF provides better product water quality with respect to total suspended solids (TSS) and coliform reduction. Table ES.2 Comparison of Typical Product Quality from Various Treatment Alternatives Treatment Type TSS BOD Total Coliform m /L m /L MPN/100 ml- Advanced Primary Effluent 40-56 110-125 50,000,000 Activated Sludge Effluent 20 20 1.000,000 MF of Primary Effluent < 3 60 < 10,000 The extensive analysis of organic compounds in the MF product water indicated that all compounds were below the discharge permit requirements. In fact, only 22 of the 159 organic compounds analyzed were present above detection limits. The concentrations of some compounds were reduced by the MF process, but the major reason for the high water quality is due to the extensive source control program at OCSD. The toxicity of the MF product water was also analyzed and found to be within the limits for ocean discharge. G;%w AfAegendal WS1200�2 OWS Agenda Repo,lA02-72.1.Eoc 5 J Membrane Integrity A significant part of the operating and maintenance costs of an MF installation will be membrane replacement cost. In order to assist with determining the condition of the membranes (apart from observing product water quality)two membrane modules were removed from the plant and sent to the membrane manufacturer(US Filter)for 'membrane autopsy". A membrane autopsy involves cutting open the membrane fibers, analyzing deposits on the membrane surface and analyzing the mechanical properties of the membrane fibers. The first membrane module was removed from the plant on February 26, 2002 and the second on July 27, 2002. The autopsies revealed that the mechanical integrity of the membrane fibers were still within the factory quality control parameters. This is an encouraging sign. Also, there were no significant deposits on the membrane surface. Another encouraging sign. Selected membranes will continue to be removed from the plant periodically during Phase II for autopsy. At the end of Phase II the membranes will have been in operation for almost 2 years. At that time, US Filter is expected to be able to provide a definitive membrane guarantee for this application. Until then, a membrane life of five years has been assumed, based upon discussions with US Filter. Membrane Cleaning During the pilot plant test work, the membranes required chemical cleaning on average every 3 to 4 days. This frequency of cleaning was confirmed during the Period 2 operation, with an average of 3.6 days. At the end of May 2002, after 25 cleaning cycles, there was a step change drop of about one day in the cleaning frequency. Since that time, the cleaning frequency has fluctuated between about 2 days and 4 days. This has dropped the average cleaning cycle frequency for the entire Phase I project(a total of 62 cleaning cycles)to 3.1 days. There are two possible causes for the change in cleaning cycle frequency that has been observed. The first relates to a number of changes that have been made to the dosage of chemicals at Plant 2 and to chemical dosages in the truck sewers feeding Plant 2 since May 2002. The second relates to the large flow variation at Plant 2, and the impact that this may have on the feed water quality to the MF plant. Investigations are continuing to see If a link can be found between these variations and the observed change in cleaning frequency. For the latest cost estimates a chemical cleaning frequency of 3 days has been assumed. Thickening MF Backwash Solids The solids in the MF backwash water are the solids that did not settle in the primary clarifiers. The most cost effective way to treat these solids is in an anaerobic digester. During the Phase I test work, preliminary investigations were carried out to determine G'kw ftUp WMOMT51100MO2 OWS AWM.R.WftW2-72.1,E 6 an appropriate way in which the solids in the MF backwash can be thickened to a concentration that will enable them to be fed to the existing anaerobic digesters. Gravity thickening, DAF (dissolved air flotation), membrane thickening and centrifuges were investigated. All technologies were able to thicken the solids in the backwash water to some degree. Thickened solids values of 0.5 to 6.0 percent were reported. All four thickening technologies will be tested at pilot scale during the Phase II testing period. DAF thickening is the process that was used in the cost estimates. COST COMPARISONS: MICROFILTRATION VS. SECONDARY TREATMENT ACTIVATED SLUDGE Cost estimates for MF continue to be updated as more performance information becomes available. Table ES.3 summarizes updated preliminary cost estimates for three alternatives; each sized to treat 100 mgd of raw wastewater. Alternative 1 assumes conventional secondary activated sludge treatment followed by disinfection with sodium hypochlorite and then de-chlorination. Alternatives 2 and 3 assume MF treatment of primary effluent. Alternative 2 assumes that the backwash water from the MF plant is treated in an activated sludge treatment plant, while Alternative 3 assumes that the MF backwash water is thickened using DAF thickening followed by anaerobic digestion of the solids. Table ES.3 Total Cost Estimate for Three Treatment Alternatives for Ocean Discharge Microfiltration Demonstration Project Orange County Sanitation District Alternative Alternative 2«I Alternative 3 1(1) MF plus MF plus DAF Conventional Activated Sludge Thickening of Activated Treatment of Backwash Sludge Backwash Water Water Amortized Capital CostM $ 34.400,000 $ 38,400,000 $ 33,000,000 Annual Operating Cost $ 9,000,000 $ 10,500,000 $ 7,500,000 Total Estimated Annual Cost $43,400,000 $ 48,900,000 $ 40,500,000 Notes: Costs based on average plant flow rate of 100 mgd (October 2002). (1) Alternative 1 includes disinfection and de-chlorination (2) Alternative 2 includes disinfection of secondary treated effluent (3) Calculated over 20 years at 6 percent fixed interest rate GA ft�ge�S2002�2002 WTS Age PApo W2-I2,tA 7 The following can be concluded from the cost estimates: 1. Alternative 3 (MF treatment plus DAF treatment of backwash water) has the lowest capital and operating cost, resulting in the lowest total annual cost, about$3 million per annum less than Alternative 1 (activated sludge secondary treatment). This equates to an annual savings of about 8 percent. 2. The cost estimate presented above refines the costs from those presented in June 2001, and those presented in October 2002. These costs confine that the MF treatment approach is the lowest cost alternative when the MF backwash water is thickened using DAF or a similarly priced alternative. 3. Use of the MF treatment approach with activated sludge treatment of the backwash water, i.e. Alternative 2, would be more costly; both in terms of capital cost and operating cost. This Alternative is presented here because it was included as an alternative in the 2002 Strategic Plan update, and is discussed in more detail below. The OCSD updated 2002 Strategic Plan includes cost estimates for incorporating MF treatment at Plants 1 and 2, and the costs suggest that activated sludge secondary treatment would be marginally cheaper than MF treatment approach. The latest cost estimates presented in this report suggest the opposite. The difference between the cost estimates presented above and the cost estimates presented in the Strategic Plan are: • The cost estimates presented here are based on stand-alone treatment plants with a single treatment approach on a green fields site, whereas the Strategic Plan costs deal with incorporating new technology into an existing secondary treatment train. Thus, the final configuration is a combination of two (or more)treatment approaches. • A slightly more conservative flux rate (11 gfd)was used to size the MF units for the Strategic Plan update, compared with average flux rates of 13 gfd that were used in this Report. The flux values of 13 gfd were based on current performance of the demonstration project. The higher flux saves about$10 million in overall project costs. • The most important point is that the Strategic Plan update assumes that activated sludge would be the process used to treat the MF backwash water. The costs presented in the Strategic Plan were based on the best understanding of implementing the technology at that time. Thus, the conservative approach of treating the MF backwash water with activated sludge was selected as a workable approach. It is clear from the cost analysis above that this approach is more expensive than using DAF for backwash treatment. Based on the analysis presented herein, it would appear that if the "MF backwash treatment with DAF" (Alternative 3) approach were incorporated into the Strategic Plan costs, the MF treatment alternative would become lower than that of activated sludge secondary treatment. c:w,,.dWWW •ia.+rWooa 2oe+rs Ap ftpo e2-72.1.a 8 IMPLEMENTATION OF MF TREATMENT AT OCSD OCSD has gained significant experience in the application of MF technology for physical treatment of primary effluent for ocean discharge. Experience has been gained during 18 months of pilot testing (1999- 2000), followed by 9-months of operation at a larger scale (2002). In addition, the recent discovery of a 1-mgd MF plant in Wales, in operation since 1997, treating wastewater for ocean discharge, provides additional confirmation of the efficacy of this technology. The Phase II test work that has just begun is expected to provide design criteria for a larger scale facility. SUMMARY Following excellent pilot plant performance of MF treatment of primary effluent in 1999 and 2000, a larger scale (200 gpm) installation has demonstrated similar performance. Nine months of continuous performance data has been obtained, including a six-month data set for inclusion in the permit application by OCSD. The work has demonstrated that high quality (low turbidity, low solids and low bacterial content)water can be consistently produced during non-biological MF treatment of primary treated effluent, despite variations in feed water quality. No further disinfection of the MF product water is required prior to ocean discharge. Cost estimates have shown that the capital cost for MF treatment of primary effluent would be lower than secondary activated sludge treatment followed by chemical disinfection to achieve a similar reduction in bacterial numbers. In addition, the operating cost of the MF treatment approach would also be significantly lower. The Phase II test work that is getting underway will identify the treatment process best suited to thicken the solids in the backwash water from the MF plant. The test work will also address ways to reduce the MF product water BOD level. Non-biological MF treatment of primary effluent for ocean discharge has many benefits that indicate it is a more sustainable treatment approach for long tens wastewater treatment compared with conventional secondary treatment. MF treatment should therefore form part of OCSD's approach to providing a higher level of wastewater treatment for discharge to the ocean. G1wp.eW nEawnarsUWo 02 OWS Ap ntl ftp ft02-72.1.0 9 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Gale To ad.of 1W. 12/4102 12/18/02 AGENDA REPORT awn Ni 1xr"Nan� orarso2-73 12(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Manager,Air Quality& Special Projects SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO EXISTING HYDROGEN PEROXIDE CONTRACT, SPECIFICATION NO. C-2002-90, FOR SUFIDE AND ODOR CONTROL IN THE TREATMENT PLANTS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 101322 issued to U.S. Peroxide (USP)for the Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. C-2002-90, for an additional amount of$600,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,426,036 for the contract period ending June 30, 2003. SUMMARY • Staff uses hydrogen peroxide chemical for odor control for the influent trunklines to remove rotten egg sulfide odor entering the treatment plants and to control odors in the chemical scrubbers used to treat odorous air from the treatment processes. In fiscal year 2002, U.S. Peroxide was awarded a one-year contract (2002-2003)for the amount of$826,036. • Staff is now requesting approval of a change order to increase the present hydrogen peroxide chemical contract ending June, 2003 by$600,000 from $826,036 to $1,426,036. • Staff has increased hydrogen peroxide chemical usage. This was done to control plant odors when staff reduced the usage of other chemicals in the collection system. The cost of the peroxide chemical increase being requested is $600,000. Staff estimates about a $565,000 chemical cost reduction in other chemicals because of the increased peroxide chemical usage. Increase in Current Contract e The chemical contract with US Peroxide will be exceeded due to the following reasons: 1. Increased usage in the odor scrubbers due to higher than expected hydrogen sulfide levels requiring treatment. G:wp.db\agenda\Boand Agenda Reporls\2002 Board Agenda Repons\120NW.12(d).US Peroxide.doc Page 1 2. Staff did not use the regional trunk system chemical treatment upstream of the plants for about seven weeks in July and August due to a delay in establishing a contract with a chemical supplier and a concern from Plant No. 2 operations that upstream treatment was negatively impacting plant disinfection efforts. During this time, increased hydrogen peroxide usage was required to improve plant odor control. The chemical cost savings in the collection system chemicals of $295,000 were approximately equal to the cost of the increased hydrogen peroxide chemical used at the treatment plant. 3. In addition, staff determined that disinfection chemical usage was higher due to the chemicals being added to the collection system for odor and corrosion control. Staff increased the peroxide chemical to reduce the disinfection chemical usage, saving $270,000 in disinfection chemicals. The implication of this change was a more reliable disinfection process. • This increased chemical usage was not budgeted in the contract with US Peroxide. Therefore, a budget increase is needed for the contract. • The existing peroxide chemical contract was awarded to US Peroxide, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $826,036 for the contract period of July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003. • Staff is requesting an increase in the contract of$600,000 for a contract amount not to exceed $1,426,036, using the unit price established in the May 2002 competitive bid. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Based on purchasing 580,000 gallons of hydrogen peroxide at a cost of$1.4242 per gallon including sales tax and delivery, the existing contract amount will not exceed $826,036. However, the current contract for 2002-2003 cannot support the actual usages required at the plants to control odors and reduce interferences with other plant chemical treatment processes. Staff requests approval of an additional 421,000 gallons for a total contract amount of$1,426,036. Additional funding is not required at this time. It is anticipated that a transfer of funds from other budget line items will cover the additional cost. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (Line item: 64) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) GAwpAla\agenda\OMTSX200=002 OUTS Agenda Repons\02.73.US Perorlde.dm Page 2 v ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES The District can elect not to increase the current hydrogen peroxide contract with US Peroxide and decrease the current chemical dosing rates. This would likely result in increased odor complaints and increased treatment plant chemical usage. CEQA FINDINGS: None ATTACHMENT None EMT/RJO:pjm Wwp.dtMagendal0MTS1200212002 OMTS Agenda Repons102-73.US Peroxide.dm Page 3 OMTS COMMITTEE Neetlng Date To ad.of Dir. 12/4/02 12/18/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Numoer Hem Number _ OMr502-74 12(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Marc Dubois, Contracts / Purchasing Manager Peter Hass, Information Technology Analyst III SUBJECT: On-line technical specification library system GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to issue a purchase order contract to PixelPushers, Inc., for Online Technical Specification Reference Library, Specification No. M-2002-100R, to provide for software and implementation services, in an amount not to exceed $186,470 plus tax. SUMMARY • Since fiscal 99 /00, the District has had approximately 335 addenda and 10 rebids caused by specification corrections or lack of required detail. The primary goal of this project is to create a Technical Specification and Scope of Work library for use by all District staff. The site will enable all department staff to have access to thousands of specifications specific to our agency's procurement requirements. • The Purchasing &Warehouse Division has continued to receive numerous requests for on-line access to a technical specification & scope of work library. Currently, a temporary paper-only library exists in hard copy format located in the Purchasing building. • This project will create an Intranet web site to host the on-line version of the Technical Specification and Scope of Work Library. It is anticipated that the use of this system will increase as the District continues its upward trend of outsourcing services, consultants, and procuring manufactured equipment. • Cost savings will be achieved in the form of minimizing rebids, addenda and legal consultation, including better value on our goods, services, and contracts. Accuracy and quality of our scopes and specifications will greatly improve, thus allowing the District to receive a more competitive procurement process. • With future plans to expand both plant operations, this District-wide resource will become more important to all staff, as our requirement for purchasing plant operating supplies and maintenance / consulting services increases to much higher levels. GAn dWbgenda� oard AgenN RePPWM2 Oaro ABenoc Reps Ml NIem 12(e)Pow PuMM 0x ee­ee. WWI Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The software package will not exceed $186,470, plus any applicable sales tax. The total project budget is $225,000. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section e, page 114&118, Project No.sP-O5-01) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Since the web application will be specifically developed for use by all District staff, the Purchasing Division has engaged representatives in each department to ensure all needs would be met once the system becomes active. The product developed by PixelPushers, Inc., does meet all requirements expressed by the Departments. ALTERNATIVES Do not move forward with the system development. CECA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS NIA G%n dtalgeoda%0MTWW92002 MIS A1.10 Fep s=74Pu IPmM1er5 da R—d WW1 Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Dare ToBdofOr. I2io4i02 wisio2 AGENDA REPORT Item Numtter Item Number oMTs02-75 Ian Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Mike Heinz, Senior Scientist SUBJECT: EXTERNAL INSPECTION OF THE 120-INCH AND 78-INCH OCEAN OUTFALLS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file External Inspection of 120" and 78" Ocean Ouffalls Report prepared by Undersea Graphics, Inc. dated January 2002. SUMMARY • The District is required by the water quality permit to property maintain the Ocean Outfall System that consists of the five mile long 120-inch main outfall and the 1.4 mile long emergency use outfall. An integral part of the preventive maintenance program is to regularly inspect and assess the condition of the Outfalls. • The goals of the inspection conducted in January 2002 were to assess the external condition of both ouffalls, identify potential problems and provide information for future planning efforts. • A manned submarine and SCUBA divers were used to complete the inspection that took eight diving days. • Don Siverts of Undersea Graphics performed an external inspection of the 120- inch (primary outfall) and 78-inch (emergency discharge) ocean ouffalls, during which he videotaped both ouffalls. • 120-Inch Outfall Inspection Results: o The 120-inch outfall has been in service for approximately 30 years. o The video showed the exterior of the 120-inch outfall to be in good condition. o The flap gate at the end of the ouffall and the scouring pad had been washed away. This was repaired in the fall of 2002. Page 1 o The contractor found that 3 of the 503 ports were partially plugged and 2 were completely plugged. The small number of plugged ports has no significant affect on outfall performance. o The ballast rock has settled for several pipe lengths. The ballast was replaced in the fall of 2002. o The contractor found continuing slight leakage under the maintenance end gate that is estimated to be equal to the leakage of one port. The leakage is inconsequential in terms of outfall performance and structural integrity. o All obstructed ports were in the last 850' of the 6000'foot diffuser. • 78-Inch Outfall Inspection Results: o Several small ports were buried. This has no implication for outfall capacity with the large ports open. o The contractor concluded that the 78-inch outfall appeared to be ready for emergency discharge. o The contractor noted concrete spalling and erosion of the diffuser Wye structure. If not corrected, this condition could worsen and result in outfall undercutting, eventually creating the potential for a break in the 78-inch Emergency Outfall. o The wye section erosion was repaired in October 2002 as part of the Orange County Reballast Project Job No. J-39. The District filled the scour void with Class C Concrete and constricted an embankment of cement sacks around the existing concrete encasement structure in order to protect the area and prevent further scouring. The concrete spalling condition is being evaluated by the Engineering department for appropriate repairs. o A total of 36 gap joints were noted during the inspection, which were determined not to compromise outfall capacity. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) Page 2 v ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The attached Staff Executive Summary lists the major findings for each outfall. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENT Staff Executive Summary MH/RJO:pjm G:\wp.dtal genda\0MTS\200212002 OMTS Agenda Reports=-75.UnderSea Graphics.doc Page 3 r STAFF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Inspection of the 120-inch and 78-inch Ocean Outfalls Final Report Prepared by Pat Magnante November 18, 2002 An inspection of the 120-inch and 78-inch ocean outfalls was completed by Undersea Graphics, Inc. in seven diving days on January 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26 and 27, 2002. The inspections covered all exposed portions of the outfalls and were documented by video taping. The major findings for each outfall inspection are listed below: Major Findings of the 2002 120-inch Ocean Outfall Inspection: 1. There are two plugged ports and 3 partially plugged ports on the diffuser section. An additional 2 effluent ports flowing at 95% plus have fluttering fibers, but are not considered obstructed in this report. All obstructed ports are in the last 35 pipe sections of the diffuser(850'). 2. The End Flap Gate structure has scour and undercutting along its offshore bottom edge where the scour tray/pad is located. The new cross bar and jacks are in place and door shows no signs of movement. There is some leakage from under the inshore side of the flap gate door. 3. The Scour Pad Ballast has a scoured depression and an adjacent mound of ballast directly out in front of the end structure. 4. A 250 foot band of grit-like material is still centered 375 feet back from the diffuser end. This inspection found the grit band subdued with sediments and fewer small snails feeding on expelled material. No white sea urchins or small brown starfish were seen. 5. No concrete spalling or deterioration was noted. One small chipped joint seen. 6. All manholes inspected were exposed and clear of the ballast rocks but have various amounts of marine growth surrounding them. Metal manhole covers show signs of rusting, but no heavy deterioration. Two manholes were not found on the inshore end of the main barrel. 7. Ballasting is very heavy over the entire ouffall. From 70 ft. inshore, the pipe is 7/8 to covered for the majority of the time. Lowest area of ballast is at the 1/3- level and extends for 1-3 pipe lengths before returning to 1/2 or higher. This area is just offshore manhole #19 and in 90 feet of water. This condition is confined to the east side of the outfall. t .I Major Findings of the 2002 78-inch Ocean Outfall Inspection: 1. One hundred and two of the 123 effluent ports on the new diffuser extension were located and documented. Remaining ports appear to be buried. 2. Majority of effluent ports documented were 95% to 98% open. Maximum obstructed ports are still 75% open. 3. Seven of 8 of the large ports of the old diffuser section are open and not obstructed. One still has a cover plate bolted over the opening which has high ballast. 4. The main barrel pipe sections showed no concrete spelling when exposed. A total of 36 joint gaps were documented on the main barrel. The Wye Structure's concrete is spelled, cracked and the structure is partially undercut. 5. Ballast stones at times cover diffuser section and main barrel pipe sections. A dense blanket of sea fans cover the upper outfall surfaces while tube worms cover the lower ballast surfaces. Manholes are exposed but have heavy growth. 6. Sediment deposits continue to increase with this inspection and give the marine layer a stringy or hairy appearance. This outfall is non-operational and, therefore, leaks would not be detectable. All items listed above are covered in more detail in the Final Report from Undersea Graphics, Inc. dated January 2002. Information obtained during this inspection has been categorized by subject matter and not in the order they were inspected. All original Digital and Hi-8 video tapes and video grabs will become part of this final report. An edited summary of the 25 hours of video has also been delivered to the District. This completes the 2002 Inspection of the 120-inch and 78-inch Ocean Outlets under Purchase Order No. 101115-001 OB. Further information or clarification of points in this report may be obtained by contacting Donald or Curt Siverts of Undersea Graphics, Inc. by phone at (310) 540-1041 or by fax at (310) 5404951. PJ M GAw .dtal nnk810\magnante\OMTS_COMM]TTEEICOORDINATIOMFY2002 03\120402\CWS02.XX-01 Attachment-78 and 120 Outtall Inspection Exew6ve Summary.doc T OMTS COMMITTEE M-ting11 Toll0/111. 12/09/02 2/18/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMTS02-76 12(g) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Douglas Stewart, Asset Management Program Manager SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN AND FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS REPORT, JOB NO. SP-68. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file Asset Management Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis Report prepared by Parsons Infrastructure and Technology, Inc., dated November 2002; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate Amendment No. 1 to the Consulting Services Agreement with Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc. for Asset Management Program, Phase 2, Job No. SP-68, providing for development of implementation plans, to be awarded by the Board of Directors at a future meeting. SUMMARY • On April 24, 2002 the Board of Directors approved a contract with Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc. (Parsons)for the purpose of developing a Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis for Asset Management (Strategic Plan). The preparation of this Strategic Plan was intended to be the first phase of a multi-phase project to bring asset management into the business practices of the District. Only Phase 1 of the work was included in the existing contract with Parsons. The Strategic Plan is now complete and the executive summary is attached to this agenda report for your review. • The next phase of the project is to develop implementation plans for a series of improvements to the organization's policies, work practices, IT infrastructure, and organization to implement recommendations developed in the Strategic Plan. District staff is very pleased with the work product delivered by Parsons and their subconsultant, GHD, Ltd., from Melbourne, Australia. Inserting a new consultant in the process at this stage of the work is not considered desirable due to increased costs for bringing a new consultant into an established methodology and the learning curve for a new consultant. District staff requests permission to negotiate a continuation of the existing contract with Parsons for the next phase of work. The costs for this effort and a proposed contract amendment will be brought to the Board for approval in February 2003. Page t PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. No expenditure authorization is being requested at this time. A budget will be developed for Phase 2 upon completion of negotiations. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This Item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2002-03 CIP Budget Sec.8, page 157) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. x Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION GENESIS OF ASSET MANAGEMENT AT OCSD In March 1996, the District underwent a competitiveness assessment of the Operations and Maintenance Department. The intent of this assessment was to document and display for the organization the gap between current O&M practices and those of private industry. The assessment was conducted by EMA, a private consulting firm. As result of this assessment, the O&M Department chose to form an in-house team to develop the solutions to closing the gap. This team was called DART, District Assessment and Reinvention Team. DART developed a plan between August 1996 and June 1998 to establish new policies, procedures, and revised work practices for the O&M Department intended to close the competitive gap. Implementation of the identified tasks has occurred from July 1998 to present, with an expected completion date of October 2003. The accomplishments of DART have been many fold, including reorganizing O&M to gain efficiencies, instituting a managed maintenance program, establishing a planning and scheduling group in maintenance, training staff in preventative and proactive maintenance techniques, building a computerized maintenance management package, among many others. Coincident with DART, the District also completed an automation reinvention project in the two treatment plants that physically tagged all of the major district assets, developed computerized records of the computer automation control system, built a computerized records maintenance system for the district's engineering drawings, documented the process and instrumentation of the treatment plants, among others. These previous efforts have become the foundation for the asset management initiatives that are currently underway. It was recognized early on in the DART process that to be truly effective in closing the gap for the entire organization that a single department could not by itself affect agency-wide effectiveness gains. It would take a concerted agency-wide program that could integrate all of the technical disciplines in the organization to realize effective change. In other words, any single technical discipline (department) could become very efficient at what they do, and in Page 2 fact all of them could. It is not until all of the technical disciplines are focused on common business goals, such as optimized stewardship of assets, that the organization becomes fully effective. After much research, in about 2000, the staff discovered the International Infrastructure Management Manual (IIMM). Australia and New Zealand published the IIMM, as a compendium of asset management practices being used in their countries. The methodology, and new management paradigm, had been located to achieve the effectiveness gains desired by the organization. Staff also realized that institutionalizing asset management agency-wide meant that the first step would be to establish a strategic-level plan. The strategic planning process was seen as key to developing a common vision for asset management and to develop widespread buy- in to further implementation. In June 2001, the Board authorized a budget for staff to proceed with the initial implementation of an asset management program. A Request for Proposals and a scope of work was issued in November 2001. Consultant proposals were received in January 2002 and the Board approved a contract for the asset management strategic planning effort in April 2002. WHAT IS ASSET MANAGEMENT? Asset Management is "Managing assets to minimize the cost of owning and operating them while continuously delivering the desired level of customer service." In other words, optimized infrastructure stewardship. THE STRATEGIC PLANNING APPROACH OCSD chose to approach implementing asset management in a three-phased approach. The first, developing a comprehensive strategic plan which include a gap analysis between world's best asset management practices and OCSD's current practices, setting three and ten year targets based on OCSD's chosen best appropriate practices. The second phase is to develop detailed implementation plan based on the best appropriate practices from the strategic plan. The third phase starts a series of continuous improvement projects to reach the three and ten year targets. The second and third phases of the effort will be implemented concurrently. OCSD established the following major goals for the strategic planning process: a. Document a "shared vision"for the desired asset management improvements. b. Identify desired outcomes in qualitative and quantitative terms. c. Provide the business case to gain support and approval for further development of the asset management program. d. Develop a gap analysis and needs assessment between the existing state of asset management practices and the desired improvement program. e. Develop strategies and recommendations for the effective deployment of the desired asset management program. Page 3 f f. Identify the structure, accountability, and responsibilities for implementation of the improvement program. The Strategic Plan was developed using the following eight fundamental steps: a. Measure our AM practices against world's best practice b. Choose our future level of best appropriate practice c. Analyze Gap in our current practices. d. Identify speck components in our AM Improvement program. e. Develop a framework for how to implement AM Improvements. f. Establish benefits of improved asset management practices and likely costs to implement. g. Determine next steps. h. Develop Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis. OCSD chose to develop a strategic plan, rather than simply implement a series of separate improvement projects, to obtain the following benefits: a. A common vision and understanding of Asset Management. b. Organizational acceptance and buy-in to an alternate way of making business decisions in the organization. c. Up-front education on the asset management processes across the organization. d. Determine the best appropriate practice "BAP"for OCSD. e. Provide a coordinated, whole-agency perspective on asset management as a management paradigm rather than a set of disjointed improvement efforts nor the tools used to do asset management. f. Bring agency focus on asset management as a management paradigm to all levels of the organization. The Strategic Plan The Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan is attached to this agenda report for your review. Staff recommends that the Board receive and file the report. A copy of the full Asset Management Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis Report is on file in the Board Secretary's office. ALTERNATIVES The Board could require staff to issue a Request for Proposals for the Phase 2 work on this project. CEQA FINDINGS This action is categorically exempt from CEQA. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis Report Page 4 7 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Str toglc ftn/or A wt Managemont sV-w - .awawu: wwam smroem fR°°°� Awe - rue vmvossn viuureo nrossxm wweerrtaeK umso� vvuzcr sunal:r "�i°E9 �urioimn aunsovaanou roru rowan waa¢i IaOGcr 11OtP�• �.^ monrz aeaear unlWmnnox ro wre rotwlmy a.. s may s s s vv, s swam s .se om s s s wms s sn en s vi ems wsoo s s wam s �wnn s s ca�em� s s s s m s m s nm�ms.w rm s mu s en.so s s.ozr.m s s t.mc® s sM.am s s sr>sso w� Page 5 4 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Brian Donahue, Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Mike Alvarez Maintenance Patty Campbell John Linder, Engineering&Construction Alice Jempsa Management Manager Beth Krom Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Matt Smith, Acting Chief Project Officer Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor Jim Dow tarry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor Doug Stewart, Utilities Management Specialist Directors Absent: Pam Koester, Project Manager Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair Jon Thomslc, Project Manager Larry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor OTHERS PRESENT: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Bill Kennedy Rich Ten Bosch Jim Clark Walid Karam (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. . t PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 December 5, 2002 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Brian Donahue did not make a report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager Blake Anderson was not present to make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin explained the CIP validation and prioritization status report. This will be presented to the PDC Committee monthly. The process is about 50 percent complete and the final report will be done in March. The draft plan will be reviewed by a peer review panel for validation. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (8) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-j) At Chair Donahue's request, Item f was pulled from the Consent Calendar and considered separately. a. RECEIVE. FILE, AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the November 7,2002 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached is the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an information only item. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There are seven change orders this month for PDC Committee approval. C. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Attached is the PSA and Addenda Report. This is an information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There were no PSAs and no Addenda approved by the General Manager from October 25 through November 21, 2002. � PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 December 5, 2002 d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only item. f. Pulled from Consent Calendar. g. PDCO2-86 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 12 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-39,with Margate Construction, authorizing a deduction of$5,182, decreasing the total contract amount to$10,911,147; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 13 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities, authorizing a decrease of$4,000, decreasing the total contract amount to$10,907,147; and (3) Accept Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, as complete,authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. h. PDCO2-87 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1) Ratify Change Order No.3 to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, with Mike Priich &Sons, Inc., authorizing an addition of$24,730, increasing the total contract amount to$650,100; (2) Ratify Change Order No.4 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities, authorizing an increase of$49,400, increasing the total contract amount to$699,500; and (3)Accept Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13.2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. i. PDCO2-88 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project, Job No.J39, with Connolly-Pacific Inc., authorizing a$10,000 credit, decreasing the total contract amount to $4,863,000; and (2)Accept Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project,Job No. J-39, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. j. PDCO2-89 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)Approve a budget amendment of$44,314 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No.2, Job No.J-66, for a total budget of$2,055,387; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66,with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of$48,114 and a time extension of 28 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,459,187; and (3)Accept Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 December 5, 2002 Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 8(a)through 8(j), except 8(f) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any, I. PDCO2-85 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No.4 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P7-37,with Margate Construction, authorWng an addition of$356,059 and an extension of 82 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $70,M,009. John Linder addressed Items 2 and 10 in the change order and described the work. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 4 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. P137, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$356,059 and an extension of 82 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$70,846,009. (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEM (Item a) a. PDC92-90 Receive and file Asset Management Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis Report,Job No.SP-68. Information only item. Doug Stewart made a presentation on asset management activities since last April, when the project was awarded. He described the asset management program and stated that a request will be made at the December Board that Phase 2 be authorized to develop tactical plans on how to achieve the goals. A state of the assets report should be complete within a year. Director Campbell requested a copy of the presentation. (10) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-c) a. PDCO2-91 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No.2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for the Trunk Sewer Mapping Project, Contract No. 1-98, providing for additional mapping services for an amount of$163,126, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,353,391. Jim Herberg explained that staff would like to add city connections to the trunk sewer maps under a future addendum to ensure that all of the critical collection system information is documented in a single location. The estimated cost for the future addendum is between $200,000 and $300,000. t PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 December 5, 2002 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for the Trunk Sewer Mapping Project, Contract No. 1-98, providing for additional mapping services for an amount of$163,126, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,353,391. b. PDCO2-92 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 11 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of$186,977, increasing the total amount not to exceed$9,655,793. Jon Thomsic reported on the need for the additional services. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 11 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job No.J-42, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of$186,977, increasing the total amount not to exceed $9,655,793. C. PDCO2-93 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for design of Headworks Improvements at Plant no. 2,Job No. P2-66, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount not to exceed $2,600,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed$15,877,372. Pam Koester described the changes that have impacted the design and the construction cost. She also outlined the extra work and the resulting increase in design fees, length of design and construction time and costs. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for design of Headworks Improvements at Plant no.2, Job No. P2-66, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount not to exceed$2,600,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $15,877,372. (11) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS,IF ANY PDCO2-94 (1) Approve a budget amendment of$500,000 for Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacterial Reduction, Job No. J-87, for a total budget of$7,930,000; (2) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black PDC Committee Minutes r r Page 6 December 5, 2002 & Veatch Corporation for Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacterial Reduction, Job No.J-87,providing additional engineering services in an amount of$$450,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed$897,920; (3)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications; (4) Receive and file letter dated November 27, 2002 from SS Mechanical Corporation, apparent low bidder, requesting to be relieved from their bid due to a mathematical error; (5) Approve the request for SS Mechanical Corporation to be relieved from their bid; (6) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (7)Award a construction contract to J. F. Shea Construction, Inc.for Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No.J-87, for an amount not to exceed $4,298,247. Jim Herberg described the reasons for the proposed changes. MOVED,SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: (1) Approve a budget amendment of$500,000 for Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacterial Reduction, Job No.J-87, for a total budget of$7,930,000; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch Corporation for Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacterial Reduction, Job No. J-87, providing additional engineering services in an amount of$$450,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed$897,920; (3)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications; (4) Receive and file letter dated November 27, 2002 from SS Mechanical Corporation, apparent low bidder, requesting to be relieved from their bid due to a mathematical error; (5)Approve the request for SS Mechanical Corporation to be relieved from their bid; (6) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (7)Award a construction contract to J. F. Shea Construction, Inc.for Short-Tenn Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No.J-87, for an amount not to exceed$4,298,247. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEOUENT MEETING There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 6, 2003 at 5 p.m. PDC Committee Minutes Page 7 December 5, 2002 (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Submitted by: J n appan P ommittee Secretary O:Mp.ElelapenMIPOL�'WZJ.MnWw\I10W3 deft Pw Mlnulw.b PDC COMMITTEE Meeing Dete Ta8d.or .Dir. 12/05/02 - 12/18/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number GDCO2-85 13(d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Dean Fisher, Project Manager SUBJECT: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. P1-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$356,059 and an extension of 82 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $70,846,009. SUMMARY Background • Job Number P1-37, Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, includes the construction of 16 new primary clarifiers with all support equipment, improvements to existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15, and improvements to Primary Clarifiers 1-5. • Brown and Caldwell prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction on October 24, 2001. • Change Order No. 4 includes seven items of additional work, and one item of deleted work. There are no errors and two omissions associated with this change order. There is an 82 day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this project are $3,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date January 7, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date November 7, 2005 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3 Current Contract Completion Date December 26, 2005 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Chanae Order No. 2 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Duct Bank"A" Modifications $64,258.00 0 Design Change 2 Duct Banks"B"and "C" $251 096.00 82 Changed Condition 3 Power Building#8 Conduits $1 164.00 0 Design Change 4 Transformer BIL Rating $5,677.00 0 Design Change 5 Reinforcing Steel Modifications $23 587.00 0 Omission 6 Trickling Filter Feed Pipe $16 943.00 0 Design Change 7 Power Bldg#7 End Wall $855.00 0 Omission 8 Power Bldg#7 Equipment Layout $26 365.00 0 Design Chan e Total Change Order No. 4 $356,059.00 82 Items 1 and 3 are related to the P1-76 Trickling Filter project currently in design. These changes accommodate recent P1-76 design updates, and avoid future conflicts. Item 2 will reroute Duct Banks "B" and "C" in order to avoid conflict with existing underground facilities and to consolidate the project electrical ductbank system. Both duct banks will be rerouted across Fuentes Road, enter the south wall of the existing PC 6-15 scum gallery, and connect to existing cable tray. Items 4 and 8 are requested by staff in order to improve electrical gear accessibility and comply with new District design standards. Job Completion The project is 20% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 70.366,000 Previously Authorized Changes $ 123,950 This Change $ 356,059 Change Orders to Date $ 480,009 Percentage Increase to Date 0.68% Amended Contract Price $ 70,846,009 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: Section 8, CIP, 131-37) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) OMISWbaN.peMaO ft R.��"7 AR CW 1 IA RoiwB. a 1 Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 4 G:Ntg bGaMgeMa G+fl flepoMW OPP13]M GG112S43.Ez Rm : a ' Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37 u �ys�T'n'� 66 ri Project Development $ 78,000 $ 78,000 -, $ 78,000 $ 78,000 $ 76,974 99% Studies/Permitting $ 191,000 . $ 191,000 '':.y';?''; $ 191.000 . $ 191,000 $ 191,781 100% Consultant PSA $ 5,205,904 $ 5 205 904 $ 5,205,904 $ 5,205,904 $ 4 010 626 770/a Design Staff $ 1,073,900 $ 1,073,000 $ 1,073,000 $ 1,073,000 $ 1,054,844 98% Construction Contract $ 70,489,950 $ 356,059 $ 70.846.009 '"''; $ 70,489,950 $.. .356 059 $ 70,846,009 $ 12,835,281 18% Construction Administration $ 2,785,000 $ 2,785,000 -i't'.':. $ 2,785,000 $ 2,785,000 $ 1,059,462 38% Construction Ins ecton $ 2763000 $ 2763000 „! $ 2763000 $ 2763000 $ 345424 13% Contingency $ 7 409 882 $ (356,059) $ 7,053,823 " $ PROJECTTOTAL $ - $ 09,947,000 $ - $ 89,947,000 JR $ 82,537,118 $ 356,059 $ 82,893,177 $ 19.574, 772 24% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ - 1 $ 89,947,000 $ - $ 89.947,000 ' $ 82,537,118 $ `.. 356,059. $ 82,893.177 $ 19,574,372 1 24% 6 EONS003737397 � CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES JOB NO. P1-37 AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACTCOST PERCENTAGE TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) TO DATE DAYS CONTRACT 6/23/1999 $ 70,366,000,00 $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 1400 1400 CO NO. 1 12/19/2001 $ - $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 0 1400 CO NO. 2 8/1/2002 $ 75,214.00 $ 70,441,214.00 0.11 49 1449 CO NO.3 10/21/2002 $ 48,736.00 $ 70,489,950.00 0.18 0 1449 EDMS\003734347 Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four 4 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities Job No P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Dedust) $356,059.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —DUCT BANK"A" MODIFICATIONS This item provides labor, materials, and equipment to: increase the depth of Duct Bank"A"from 30- inches to 8-feet in order to avoid conflict with a future electrical duct planned for the P1-76 project, add 90 feet of reinforced concrete duct bank due to differences between the distance shown on plans and actual distance between manholes, and remove portions of an abandoned duct bank in conflict with specified work. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-20, RFP-010). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $64,258.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2— DUCT BANKS"B"AND"C" MODIFICATIONS This item provides labor, materials, and equipment to reroute Duct Banks"B" and "C"from their specified location. There were no feasible locations for Duct Bank"B" near the Scrubber complex due to conflicts with existing underground facilities. The decision was made to relocate Duct Bank"B"to the existing clarifiers and tunnel system. Ductbank"C"was also moved to this location in order to avoid conflicts and to consolidate the project electrical ductbank system. Both duct banks will be rerouted across Fuentes Road, enter the south wall of the existing PC 6-15 scum gallery, and connect to the existing cable trey system. Some of the changes include: 32,000 LF of standard cable replaced with tray rated cable; 1,800 LF of additional conduit; 200 LF of additional cable tray with supports; 2,400 LF of large cable; 9,500 LF of small cable; and more difficult installation. The coordination efforts involved with the design and construction of the new duct bank alignment under the darifiers affected the critical path of the project, thus requiring a contract time extension. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-21, RFP-011.1). ADDED CAST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $251,096.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 82 Calendar Days � I Page 2 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mamate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four 4 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 3—POWER BUILDING#8 CONDUITS This item provides labor, materials, and equipment to install (3) PVC electrical conduits under the foundation of Power Building#7 to serve future Power Building#8 facilities planned for P11-76. Only those portions of conduits under Power Building#7 will be constructed in this project. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-12137-32). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,164.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4—TRANSFORMER BIL RATING This item provides labor, materials, and equipment to increase the winding Basic Impulse Level (BIL) rating from 95 KV to 110 KV on 12 KV winding and from 30 KV to 45 KV on the 480 V winding for two 2000 KVA transformers being provided for Power Building#T This change is requested by District staff in order to conform to OCSD Power Distribution Standards. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-34). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,677.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5—REINFORCING STEEL MODIFICATIONS This item provides labor, materials, and equipment for reinforcing steel modifications, which were requested by the design consultant, in order to correct various omissions in the plans. These include additional lengths of horizontal tails for wall dowels, increased lengths of vertical dowels at the Centerfeed Channel, additional reinforcement in the Scum Gallery Wall at Column Line 18, and additional reinforcement to the Main Gallery Channels shown in section 1/S120. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-37/RFP-016, FCO-P137-40, FCO-P137-41, FCO-P137- 42). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $23.587.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 0 Page 3 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Maroate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four 4 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 6-TRICKLING FILTER FEED PIPE This item deletes approx. 40 LF of 60 RCP pipeline shown on Sheets C3, C5, and M155 and provides a temporary plug for future connection. The purpose of this pipe was to feed the future P1-76 Trickling Filters from the P1-37 East Effluent Distribution Structure. During construction, it was determined that the configuration shown on the plans did not coordinate well with future P1-76 improvements. A decision was made to transfer this work to P11-76. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-38, RFP-014). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($16,943.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—POWER BUILDING#7 END WALL This item provides labor, materials, and equipment to add a metal stud/Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS) end wall to the fagade at Power Building No. 7. This change includes installation, material, and added detailing. This item was added by the design consultant in order to correct an omission in the plans. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48(B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-39, RFI 102.1). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $855.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8— POWER BUILDING#7 EQUIPMENT LAYOUT This item provides labor, materials, and equipment to modify the specified equipment layout for Power Building#7. This change modifies the location of electrical conduit and cable tray, panels, vaults, and grounding cable. Additional cost items include 25 feet of 6,000 amp cable bus, additional conduit and lighting fixtures. This change was requested by District staff, in order to provide adequate safe working access around electrical equipment. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-43, RFP-003). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $26,365.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $356,059.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 82 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 82 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Item 2 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 7, 2002 Original Contract Time: 1,400 Days Original Completion Date: November 7,2005 Time Extension this C.O.: 82 Days Total Contract Time Extension: 131 Days Revised Contract Time: 1,531 Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 6, 2006 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $ 70,366,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 123,950.00 This Change (Add)(9edusy $ 356,059.00 Amended Contract Price $ 70,846,009.00 i Page 5 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four 4 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities Job No Pt-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Board Authorization Date: December 18, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Dale Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION Contractor Dale EomSI PDC COMMITTEE WeeWg Date To Bd.of Mr. 12/05/02 12/18/02 AGENDA REPORT Rm N=W Nw be PDOD— 13(m Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND O AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-39 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 12 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing a deduction of$5,182, decreasing the total contract amount to $10,911,147; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 13 for an Adjustment of Engineers Quantities, authorizing a decrease of$4,000, decreasing the total contract amount to $10,907,147; and (3) Accept Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J. K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • Job No. P2-39, Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, includes the cleaning of accumulated grit from the digesters, installing a flow mixing system to increase digester efficiency and reduce grit accumulation, insulating four of the digester domes to reduce heat loss, adding an interior plastic liner on the digester domes, and upgrading the digester control systems. • Lee and Ro and Spec Services prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction on August 25, 1999. • Change Order No. 12 includes three items of added work and one item of deleted work to the contract. Change Order No. 13 is an Adjustment of Engineers Quantities. There are no errors or omissions associated with these change orders. Liquidated damages are $1,000 per day and there are no time extensions associated with these change orders. Page 1 Contract Schedule 10 Contract Start Date October 26, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date October 24, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 11 Current Contract Completion Date August 14, 2002 Actual Completion Date August 14, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Change Order No. 12 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Biosolids Mixing in Drying Beds $18,603 0 Design Change 2 Remove Exhaust Fans $1,697 0 Design Change 3 Remove Knife Gate Valves Inside $7,847 0 Design Change Di esters I and J Pump Rooms 4 Modify Graphics Screen Naming $3,877 0 Design Change Scheme Total Change Order No. 12 $5,182 0 Change Order No. 13 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 1 Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities $4,000 0 Other Total Change Order No. 13 $4,000 0 Job Completion This contract is now 100% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 1,268,729.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ ($9,182.00) Change Orders to Date $ 1,259,547.00 Percentage Increase to Date 13.06% Amended Contract Price $10,907,147.00 Note: Change Order No. 2 in the amount of$552,000 included hauling and land application of dried biosolids obtained during the digester cleaning process not Included in this contract. Change Order No. 2 resulted in cost savings of $111,180 to the District. The total change order percentage including Change Order No. 11 would be 7.33% without Change Order No. 2. Page 2 ' BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section a-Page 80) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA and District's guidelines, Section 15301 (B). The Notice of exemption was filed with the County Clerk on March 17, 1998. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 12 4. Change Order No. 13 UM:dm G:WgbbWMg.M Drefl Repp WDUP2-39 C012,13 and COAAR 120502.d. Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I,J,K,L,M,N, AND O AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PR9ED ESTIISATED E'STIAGCTED�. PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REV19Eb "AUTHOR52Eb AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE E((PENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TODATE REQUEST AUTHU12VATIOfl ToMTE TO MATE(%) Project Development StudieslPermitin Consultant PSA $ 1,D45,000 $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 $ 879.810 $ 879.810 $ 870,000 99% Design Staff $ 130,000 $ 844.000 $ - $ 844,000 $ 844.000 $ 844,000 $ 844.000 100% Construction Contract $ 9.875,000 $11,023.000 $ $ 11.023,000 $ 10.916.329 $ 9,182 $ 10,907,147 $ 10,916.329 100% Construction(other) $ 1,007,000 $ - $ 1,007.000 $ 481,908 $ 481,9D8 $ 481,9D8 100% Construction Staff $ 50,000 $ 1,380,000 $ - $ 1,380,000 $ 1.380.000 $ 1,380.000 $ 1,330.000 98% Contingency Is - is - is $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 11,100,000 $ 15,154,000 $ $15.154,000 -. $ 14,502.047 $ (9,182) $ 14,492,865 $ 14,442,737 100% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 11,100,000 1 $16,154,000 $15.154.000 1 $ 14,502.047 1 $ (9,182) $ 14,492,865 $ 14,442,237 100% EDMS 003742807 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND O AT PLANT 2 JOB NO. P2-39 ITEAPPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME M DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 812511999 $ 9,647,600 $ 9,647,600 730 730 CO NO. 1• 3/28/2000 $ (142,344) $ 9,505,256 -1.48% 72 802 CO NO. 2 4/26/2000 $ 562,000 $ 10,057,256 4.25% 0 802 CO NO. 3' 7/6/2000 $ 70,815 $ 9,986,441 3.51% 0 802 CO NO. 4 7/19/2000 $ 91.834 $ 10,078,275 4.46% 56 858 CO NO. 5 10125/2000 $ 196,994 $ 10,275,269 6.51% 28 886 CO NO. 6 12/20/2000 $ 52,782 $ 10,328,051 7.05% 0 886 CO NO. 7 2/28/2001 $ 221,581 $ 10,549,632 9.35% 30 916 CO NO. 8•• 5/1 712 0 01 $ 54,073 $ 10,603,705 9.91% 0 916 CO NO. 9'• 916/2001 $ 71,863 $ 10,675,568 10.66% 1 0 916 CO N 2 $ 027 $ 1712395 117 63 979 CONO / 602 $ 107,7. 251220 186,529 136% 104 6 CO NO. 121 Pending $. 5 182 $ 10 911. 147 1 13.10%. . 1 0 ' 1124 CO NO. 131 Pending $ 4 000 $ 10,907,1471 13.06% 0 - -1024 'Approval by GM per delegalied authority by Board Resolution 99-23 "PDC Approval EDMS 003742609 ti Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Twelve (12) Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I. J. K. L. M N. and O at Plant No. 2 Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro. Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduct) ($6.182.00) In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — BIOSOLIDS MIXING IN DRYING BEDS This item is for reimbursement from the contractor for District furnished labor and equipment to mix biosolids in the drying beds. The contract required the contractor to pump biosoilds (obtained during cleaning)from digesters to the drying beds and mix the material periodically to assist with the drying process. The District had the machinery to perform the specked mixing operation. The contractor requested District staffs assistance to mix biosolids in the drying beds to facilitate removal of water from the biosolids. The District periodically provided a loader and an operator during mixing operations for a total of 238 hours during this project. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 10. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($18,603.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2— REMOVE EXHAUST FANS This item is for labor, material, and equipment to remove two abandoned exhaust fans in the Digester T Electrical Room Roof and in the Digesters P and Q Electrical Room Roof. Work included removing the two exhaust fans, electrical wiring, conduits, and replacing the voids with fabricated roof covers. This work was required to close voids (caused due to the abandoned exhaust fans) and to allow for proper air balancing for the new HVAC system installed in Electrical Rooms for Digesters T and P and Q. This work was not included in the contract documents and was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No.47 and Margate's Letter Dated September 4, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,697.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Twelve (12) Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I. J. K. L. M. N. and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro. Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. ITEM 3— REMOVE AND REPLACE KNIFE GATE VALVES INSIDE DIGESTERS I AND J PUMP ROOMS This Rem is for labor, material, and equipment to remove three non-operating knife gate valves (two 8-inch and one 18-inch). The two 8-inch gate valves were replaced by the Contractor with District furnished plug valves and the one 18-inch gate valve was replaced with a spacer. New pressure taps and drains taps were also added. This extra work was not shown in the contract documents but was requested by O&M staff and was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 46 and Margate's Letter Dated September 30, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,847.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4— MODIFY GRAPHICS SCREEN NAMING SCHEME This Rem is for the following additional work: A. Rename all Crisp screens. B. Modify hot-key links for overview screen and process graphic screens. C. Modify hot-key links for autolmanual station screens. D. Modify hot-key links for configuration, tuning, and summary screens. E. Perform limited checks for screen navigation. During the implementation of automation software for this project the number of screens were increased from 50 to 89. This item includes work to link the additional screens created to the rest of the screens created on this project. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(8)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference Margate's Letter Dated October 24, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,877.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($5,182.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C.O. No.: Twelve 1112) Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters 1. J. K. L. M. N. and O at Plant No 2 Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro. Inc. and Spec. Services Inc. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 26, 1999 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 24, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 294 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 1024 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 14, 2002 Projected Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: August 14, 2002 n Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Prev .Authorized Changes $ 1,268,729.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (5,182.00) Amended Contract Price $10,911,147.00 n Paps 4 of 4 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Twelve (12) Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I. J. K. L. M. N. and O at Plant No. 2. Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro. Inc. and SDec. Services, Inc. Board Authorization Date: December 18, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: John Linder, Construction & Engineering Manager Date Approved by: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Margate Construction, Inc. Contractor Yale - EMS 003742603 l Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Thirteen (13) Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Dioesters I. J. K. L. M. N. and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro. Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduct) ($4.000.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES Deduct: Item Unit Description From To Difference U.P. Total 14.d Each Time Impact Analysis 8 0 (8) $500 ($4,000.00) Total ($4,000.00) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($4,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($4,000.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Thirteen (13) Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I. J. K. L. M. N. and O at Plant No. 2. Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro. Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 26, 1999 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 24, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 294 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 1024 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 14, 2002 Projected Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: August 14, 2002 n Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Prev . Authorized Changes $ 1,263,547.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (4,000.00) Amended Contract Price $10,907,147.00 n t Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Thirteen(13) Date: December 18. 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I J. K. L. M. N and O at Plant No. 2. Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro. Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. Board Authorization Date: December 18, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: John Linder, Construction & Engineering Manager Date Approved by: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Margate Construction, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS 003742604 PDC COMMITTEE Mrng Date ro Bd.of D". 7 17JOs/02 17/la/a2 AGENDA REPORT Item D 02-87 Item13(e) Pm Num Nu r Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer, SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWER-ARLINGTON CONTRACT NO. 6-13-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, with Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc., authorizing an addition of$24,730, increasing the total contract amount to $650,100; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities, authorizing an increase of$49,400, increasing the total contract amount to $699,500; and (3) Accept Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Adington, Contract No. 6-13-2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • Contract No. 6-13-2 includes the construction of 1,360 feet of 15-inch sewer pipe in Arlington Avenue, 480 feet of 18-inch sewer pipe through Costa Mesa High School property, abandonment of approximately 2,960 feet of 18-inch sewer pipe in Monterey Avenue /Arlington Avenue, and through a soccer complex, and the rehabilitation of approximately 2,165 feet of sewer pipe between Costa Mesa High School and Orange County Fairgrounds property. • The Plans and Specifications were completed by Boyle Engineering in May 2002, and the Contract was awarded to Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc. on June 26, 2002. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date August 1, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date November 28, 2002 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Date November 28, 2002 Actual Completion Date October 1, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A ,,, WIM Page 1 Change Order No. 3 Content r Item Description No. Amount Days Type 1 Extra work due to realigned sewer $4,416.00 0 Changed Condition 2 Water main delay 946.00 0 Changed Condition 3 Additional sewer laterals and 4,238.00 0 Changed connections Condition 4 Temporary ermit and delay 903.00 0 1 Other 5 Additional clean-outs 585.00 0 Changed Condition 6 Drive-way replacement 1,568.00 0 Changed Condition 7 Connection between two manholes 909.00 0 Omission 8 Extras for larger manhole 1,478.00 0 Design Change 9 Fill in of Manhole bottoms 5,187.00 0 Design Change 10 Extra abandonment costs 4,500.00 0 Changed Condition Total Change Order No. 3 $24,730. 0 Change Order No. 4 Item No. Description Amount I Days a T e 1 Adjustment of Engineers Quantities 1 $49,400. 10 11Other Total Change Order No. 4 $49 400. 0 Job Completion The contract is now 100% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 596,370.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 29,000.00 This Change (Add) (Dedw $ 74,130.00 Change Orders to Date $ 103,130.00 Percentage Increase to date 17.29% Amended Contract Price $ 699,500.00 Note: The total change order percentage would be 12.4% without the bonus payment of $29,000 for early completion in Change Order No. 2 R.MW..&Ib90 Page 2 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted.(Line item: CIP Budget Fv 2002-03, Section 8, pg.34) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Note: There is not budget increase requested. All of the contingency dollars were moved to cover increases to the construction contract for Change Order Nos. 3 and 4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is covered in the previously approved 1989 Master Plan / EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989 and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 3 4. Change Order No. 4 BP:ba:lc G:WglobalUgenda Draft Repoee\PDC16-13.2 A R C034COM2-05-02.doc a W:v,o9a Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWER ARLINGTON CONTRACT NO. 6-13-2 x, 2 a Pro'ect Develo ment $ ,Studies/Permitting $ 279 $ 279 $ 279'. $ 279 $ 279 100% Consultant PSA Design Staff $ 21.000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21.000 $ 21.000 $ 6,320 30% Construction Contract $ 596,370 $ 625,370 $ 74.130 $ 699,500 '` $ 625370 $ 74180:. $ 699560 $ 576526 82% Construction Administration $ 72,000 $ 72.000 $ 32000 $ 40,000 ^` $ 72000 1 $ 72,000 $ 21699 30% Construction Inspection $ 87,000 $ 87,000 $ :(7.000) $ 80,000 $ 87,000 $ 87.000 $ 66 300 76% Contingency $ 353,630 $ 324,630 $ 35,409 $ 289,221 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 1,130,000 $ 1,130,000 $ 1,130,000 - $ 806,370 $ 74,459 $ 879,829 $ 671,124 76% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1$ 1.130,000 $ 1,130,000 $ $ 1,130,000 N $ 805,370 74,459f $ 879,829 $ 671,124 1 76% owmaarnpwm9en.me&lszcoascoA CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWERS-ARLINGTON JOB NO. 63-13-2 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT Aug.1,2002 $596,370 120 120 CO NO. 1 10/21/02 $0 $596,370 0 120 CO NO. 2 1 Pending 1 $29,0001 $625.370 1 4.64% 0 120 CO NO. 3 Pending $24,730 $650,1001 9.01% 0 120 CO NO.4 Pending $49,400 $699,500 17.29% 0 120 EDMS: V Page 1 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Prlich & Sons. Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. Amount of this Change Order(Add) (9eduet) $ 24,730.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - EXTRA WORK DUE TO REALIGNED SEWER This item is for extra labor, equipment, and material costs that the Contractor incurred due to a change in alignment between Station Numbers 0+30 to 5+10. The Contractor started to saw cut and break the trench pavement based on the design plans, but it was determined by staff that there was a clearance problem with an adjacent parallel water main. The Public Health code requires a minimum of four feet clearance, which the Contractor could not maintain without revising the design alignment. A pavement scar identifying the trench for the water line was the only record of its location. The actual location of the water line pipe was found, not in the center of the scar, but to vary from one side of the scar to the other. The majority of the extra cost is for additional paving. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,416.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—WATER MAIN DELAY During construction of a manhole at Station No. 19+89,the Contractor damaged an unmarked and undisclosed six-inch water line. The Contractor incurred delays until the school district repaired the line. In addition, the Contractor had to pump the excavation out and remove mud. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 946,00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page of ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 109" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Prlich & Sons. Inc. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: December 18. 2002 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington Contract No.6-13-2 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. ITEM 3—ADDITIONAL SEWER LATERALS AND CONNECTIONS This item is for labor, equipment, and material to install three extra service laterals and two cleanouts and connections at a new manhole, located at Station No.19+89. All of the laterals came into the manhole at non-standard angles, and two of the laterals came in too high requiring the Contractor to build a drop manhole at this location. These laterals were not shown on the Contract Drawings. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,238.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4—TEMPORARY PERMIT AND DELAY The City of Costa Mesa required the Contractor to secure a temporary one day permit to join an existing 18-inch VCP pipe between Station Nos. 0+D0 to 0+24. As a result, the Contractor's operation was delayed for one hour. This was not part of the City Encroachment Permit requirements and not required in the contract (Contractor was installing pipe on Costa Mesa High school property). This work was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 903.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5—ADDITIONAL CLEANOUTS The Costa Mesa Sanitary District requested the installation of two cleanouts for a new manhole built at Station No. 26+52 due to an undisclosed lateral. There was one additional service lateral that connected into this manhole and its invert elevation was above the base, thus requiring a drop manhole. This additional lateral was not shown on the contract plans. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 585.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days J Page 3 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Pdich &Sons. Inc. C.O. No.: Three 3 Dale: December 18, 2002 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington Contract No. 6-13-2 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. ITEM 6—DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT This item is for labor, equipment, and material to replace a driveway located on Arlington (north side of the street, approach to school property) at approximate Station No. 1+50. During the final jobwalk with City Staff, the City claimed that the driveway was damaged sometime during the time construction occurred on Arlington. The Contractor claimed that the driveway was cracked prior to any work on Arlington. TO resolve this dispute, District Staff agreed to reimburse the Contractor for a portion of his total cost for the repair. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,568.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—CONNECTION BETWEEN TWO MANHOLES This item is for labor, equipment, and material to install nine feet of 12-inch VCP pipe including connections between manholes at Station No. 13+21 to 13+30. There was no basis of payment provided for in the contract. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(8) 2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 909.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8—EXTRAS FOR LARGER MANHOLE This item is for extra labor, equipment, and material costs to install a 60-inch diameter manhole at Station No. 32+26. The design plans showed a 48-inch manhole to be built at this location. There were two sewer pipes connecting into this manhole at skewed angels making it extremety difficult to fit up and form into a 48-inch base. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,478.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Pdich & Sons. Inc. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: December 18. 2002 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. ITEM 9—FILL IN OF MANHOLE BOTTOMS This item is for labor, equipment, and material to fill in the inverts of the channels across the manholes between the inlet and outlet host pipe (for seven manholes). The Contract Scope of Work required the Contractor to rehabilitate an existing 18-inch VCP sewer pipe with a machine spiral wound polyvinyl chloride pipe liner. Included within the rehabilitation zone, are seven manholes that were built per Costa Mesa Sanitation District (CMSD) standard drawings. These drawings did not show the lining material to be extended across the manhole; hence, leaving a 3/4-inch gap that had to be filled in. Due to the potential for debris buildup, CMSD staff requested that the manhole bottoms be raised or filled In to match the invert elevation of the newly lined pipe. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10.6(B) 2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,187.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10—EXTRA ABANDONMENT COSTS This item is for extra labor, equipment, and material costs to abandon in place an existing 18-inch VCP sewer between Station Nos. 10+11 to 17+35(across soccer field). The City permit denied the Contractor access to the soccer field, which prevented him from pumping from manhole to manhole. The Contractor was required to use a heavier sand cement type slurry mix (10 sack versus 3.2 sack) and a special type pump with a foam mixing machine. This hem was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 24,730.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days v Page 5 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Pdich & Sons. Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Adington Contract No 6-13-2 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed Incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 1,2002 Original Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 28, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 120 Calendar Dsys Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 28, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: NIA Actual Final Completion Date: October 1, 2002 Original Contract Price $ 596,370.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 29,000.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 24,730.00 Amended Contract Price $ 650,100.00 Page 6 of 8 y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor Mike Prlich & Sons. Inc. C.O. No.: Three 3 Dale: December 18, 2002 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. Board Authorization Date: December 18, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John D. Linder, P.E. Construction Manager Dale Approved by: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc. Contractor Date J Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Prlich & Sons. Inc. C.O. No.: Four 4 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Pedust) $49 400.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract andfor contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - EXTRA ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES Add: Item Unit Description From To Diff U.P. Total 7 VF 48-inch Manhole 95 98 3 $ 400 $ 1,200.00 10 EA Remove & Construct 3 6 3 $19.000 $57,000.00 48-inch Manhole Subtotal $58,200.00 Deductions: Item Unit Description From To Diff U.P. Total 3 CY Crushed Rock 0-12 in. 200 0 (200) $22 $ (4,400.00) 4 CY Crushed Rock 12-24 in. 200 0 (200) $22 $ (4,400.00) Subtotal $(8,800.00) TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $49,400.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 v ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 109" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Prlich &Sons. Inc. C.O. No.: Four 4 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington Contract No. 6-13-2 Consultant: Boyle Ennineerina. Inc. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 1, 2002 Original Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 28, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 120 Calendar Dsys Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 28, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: October 1, 2002 Original Contract Price $ 596,370.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 53,730.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 49,400.00 Amended Contract Price $ 699,500.00 d Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Prlich & Sons. Inc. C.O. No.: Four 4 Date: December 18 2002 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2 Consu0ant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. Board Authorization Date: December 18, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, Construction Manager Date Approved by: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Mike Priich &Sons, Inc. Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE r�n•y d� Tn9d19/02ar. 17/05/02 UJ AGENDA REPORT P002-88 1OeD02-88 1e iNia1be 13(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Duane Jensen, Engineer SUBJECT: OCEAN OUTFALL RE-BALLAST PROJECT JOB NO. J-39 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project, Job No. J-39, with Connolly-Pack Inc., authorizing a $10,000 credit, decreasing the total contract amount to $4,863,000; and (2)Accept Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project, Job No. J-39, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Backaround • Job No. J-39, Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project, includes placement of additional larger rock along approximately one mile of the 120-inch ocean outfall and miscellaneous repairs to the 120-inch outfall and the 78-inch ocean outfalls in order to bring the existing ocean outfall system up to current engineering standards. • In January 2001, Carollo Engineers was contracted by the District to provide engineering services to prepare plans and specifications necessary to re-rock approximately one mile of the 120-inch outfall, repair the 120-inch outfall scour pad, and repair some minor undercutting on the 78-inch outfall. • In February 2002, Connolly Pack Inc. was contracted by the District to provide marine construction services to place approximately 60,000 tons of additional ballast rock and perform additional marine services to complete the miscellaneous repairs to the 78-inch and 120-inch ocean outfalls in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. • Item 1 of this Change Order includes a $10,000 credit for costs associated with regulatory permits needed to perform the marine construction. District staff acquired all regulatory permits necessary to perform the work prior to commencement of construction. The District is therefore due a credit for the w..ra: d,aee 1 $10,000 amount stipulated under Allowance for Permits in the Schedule of Prices in accordance with Section 11, of the General Requirements, of the specifications. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date May 1, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date December 27, 2002 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 0 Current Contract Completion Date October 24, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Chance Order No. 1 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Contractor to obtain and pay ($10,000) 0 Changed for all additional permits Condition necessary for performance of the work. Total Change Order No. 1 $10,000 0 Job Comoleted The Contract is now 100% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 4,873,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0 This Change (Deduct) $ (10,000.00) Change Orders to Date $ 0 Percentage Increase to Date (.002%) Amended Contract Price $ 4,863,000.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 87) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No additional funds are required. Please refer to the Budget Information Table. nem :Wla 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS In accordance with Section 15302 of Article 19, of the California Environmental Quality Act, this project is categorically exempt from the preparation of environmental documentation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order DJ:CH:dm G:NtgbbaMgeMa DrzR Report XPDCU39 AR CO 1 and COA 120502.E ae.+..a:Ulm 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Ocean Outfall Reballast Project JOB NO. J-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTfTASH AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 109,000 $ 109,000 $ 109,000 $ 109,000 $ 109.000 100% Studies/Permitting $ 662,000 $ 662,000 $ 667,000 $ 667,000 $ 667,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 162,000 $ 162.000 $ 300,000 $ 300.000 $ 260,000 87% Design Staff $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 716,000 $ 716,000 $ 716,000 100% Construction Contract $ 5.277,000 ($10.000) $ 5,277.000 $ 4.873,000 ($10,000) $ 4.863,000 $ 3,516,000 72% Construction Administration $ 138,000 $ 138.000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 100% Construction Inspection $ 913,000 $ 913,000 $913.000 $ 913.000 Contingency $ 500,000 $10.000 $ 500.000 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 7,961,000 $ - $ - $ 7,961,000 $ 7,628,000 ($10,000) $ 7,618,000 $ 5,318,000 70% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 7,961,000 $ - $ - $ 7.961,000 $ 7,628.000 $ (10,000) $ 7,618,000 $ 5.318.000 1 70% EDMa:003742731 1 , f � CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT OCEAN OUTFALL REBALLAST PROJECT JOB NO. J-39 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (TIME TIME TO DATE CONTRACT 5/l/2002 $4,873,000 $4,873,000 240 240 Qp CO,Nb 1 PettBing $10 OQA) $4 3iS r F', 240 ; �N EDMS:M3742732 V Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 109" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Connolly-Pacific Co. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project Consultant: Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order(Deduct) $(10.000.00) In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract andfor contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES Deduct: Item Unit Description From To Total 6 L.S. Additional Regulatory $10,000 $0 (10,000.00) Permit Fees Total (10,000.00) CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($10,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($10,000.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Connolly-Pack Co. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project Consultant: Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: May 1, 2002 Original Contract Time: 240 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: December 27, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 240 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: December 27, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: October 24, 2002 Original Contract Price $4,873.000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ .00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (10,000.00) Amended Contract Price $4,863,000.00 y Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Connolly-Pacific Co. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Re-Ballast Project Consultant: Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: December 18, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, Engineering and Construction Manager Date Approved by: David Ludwin P.E., Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: CONNOLLY-PACIFIC CO. Contractor Date EDM5003742730 r PDC COMMITTEE Meedng Date To ad.ofDir. 1210502 12HaH2 AGENDA REPORT tern Number 1311 Item Number - Orange County Sanitation District PDCwAn FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$44,314 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, for a total budget of$2,055,387; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $48,114 and a time extension of 28 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,459,187; and (3)Accept Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • Job No. J-66, Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, includes construction of a new meter vault and installation of a new Fowmeter on the existing 120-inch outfall. • Train Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Urbantec Engineers, Inc. on June 28, 2000. Specialized services during construction for soils testing, excavation, dewatering, and grouting design was provided by Ninyo and Moore. • Item 2 of this Change Order includes costs to increase the depth of the electrical duct bank. The location of the specified electrical duct-bank conflicted with the future location of a fiber optics line that will be installed under the SP2000-61 project. By increasing the depth of the duct bank under this project, gextensive excavation and shoring will be avoided on the future SP2000-61 project. This change was on the critical path of the project schedule and delayed project completion by 28 days. • Change Order No. 5 includes four items of added work to the contract. There are no errors or omissions associated with this change order. Liquidated damages are $500 per day and there is a 28-day time extension with this change order. There are no time extensions that are subjected to liquidated damages. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date September 18, 2000 Original Contract Completion Date March 16, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Date August 10, 2002 Actual Completion Date September 7, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Change Order No. 5 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Flowmeter Control Panel, Sump Pump $10,014 0 Design Change Panel, and Mini Power Center Installation Modifications 2 Electrical Duct Bank Modifications $6,579 28 Other 3 Modify Flowmeter Control Panel and $21,488 0 Design Change Remote 1/0 Panel 4 Concrete Walkway and Reinforcement $10,033 0 Design Change Additions Total Change Order No. 5 $48,114 28 Job Completion The contract is now 100% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 465,073.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 48,114.00 Change Orders to Date $ 513.187.00 Percentage Increase to Date 54.25%' Amended Contract Price $1,459,187.00 `Change Order Nos. 2 and 3 included costs in the amount of$401,588 to perform grouting below the 120-inch outfall pipe due to unforeseen soil conditions. The total change order percentage including Change Order No. 5, would be 11.80%without Change Order Nos. 2 and 3 grouting costs. R.... b 1 2 P BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 88) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff requests a budget amendment of$44,314. The additional funds requested for this project provide for Change Order No. 5 and for staff labor to complete the project. Some of the funds are reallocated from Consultant PSA to Construction Staff and Construction Contract. Please refer to the Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan. The final EIR was approved on October 27, 1999 and the Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order UM:dm G:WgIo N4, do DnN ReporteVWU-66 M CO 5110702A= 3 e.wert armg, BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE OUTFALL FLOW METER REPLACEMENT JOB NO. J-66 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED EUy, PRDVOSED ESIMATED :E871MATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTAO IYED AUTHORIZ 'JtON. TOTAL, - EAPE7bEb BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE RF,oUEST AUTHOIfIZAT10N ;,T07SATE ,.­O;DATEI%I ,t Pro act Development $ $ Desi n Staff $ 45.000 $ 45,000 $ 45.000 $ 45.000 $ 45,000 $ 45.000 100% Consultant PSA $ 57.200 $ 106.000 $ 23.800 $ 82.200 $ 82,200 $ $2.200 $ 80,000 97% Construction Contract $ 514.000 $ 1.411,073 $ 48,114 $ 1.459,187 $ 1.411,073 $ 48114 $ 1.459187 $ 1.411 073 97% Construction(Other) $ 27.000 $ 135.000 $ - $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ - $ 135.000 $ 123804 92% Constmction Staff $ 135,700 $ 314,000 $ 20,000 $ 334,000 $ 314,000 $ 20,000 $ 334,000 $ 321,527 96% Cmfingency $ 145,100 $ - $ - $ $ TOTAL $ 924.000 $ 2,011.073 $ 44,314 $ 2.055.387 $ 1,987.273 1 $ 68.114 $ 2,055,387 $ 1,981,404 96% .f EOMa 003731918 P1/ CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT JOB NO. J-66 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/28/2000 $ 946,000 $ 946,000 180 180 CO NO. 1 5/23/2001 $ (2,692) $ 943,308 -0.28% 290 470 CO NO. 2 3/27/2002 $ 175,769 $ 1,119,077 18.3% 75 545 CO NO, 3 1 6/26/2002 $ CO NO. 4 925/2002 243204 13 40 % 126 671 1,28 73 49. $ 48,792 0 16/ 21 692 CO NO. 5 Pending S 48.114 $ 1,459,187 54.25% 1 28 720 EDMS 003741338 a Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Five 5 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tren Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Berle, ) $48,114.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - FLOWMETER CONTROL PANEL, SUMP PUMP PANEL, AND MINI POWER CENTER INSTALLATION MODIFICATIONS This item includes costs for labor, material, and equipment to perform the following modifications: A. Modify supports and conduits to 0owmeter and sump pump panels: Work included modifications to four stainless steel supports and conduits to the panels. The length of the designed supports was inadequate and new supports of sufficient length were fabricated and installed to provide proper support for the panels. The cost for this change includes credit for the designed stainless steel supports. Cost of this change is $3,410.00. B. Increase size of canopy and concrete slab: The size of the canopy and concrete slab was increased (from 5'x8' to 6'x10') to provide necessary spacing between the panels and transformer to meet code requirements. Cost of this change is$6,604.00. The above mentioned changes were necessary because the exact size of the panels were not known during the design phase. The new panels were bigger and heavier than estimated by the design engineer during the design phase. This work was not included in the contract documents and negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2) a of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No.6 and Urbantec's Letter Dated August 19, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,014.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 0 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Urbantec Engineers Inc. C.O. No.:Five 5 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfell Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers ITEM 2—ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK MODIFICATIONS This item includes costs to increase the depth of the electrical duct bank from the Flowmeter Structure to the Sampler Building. The depth of the electrical duct bank was increased to accommodate the new fiber optic line that will be installed on the SP2000-61 project. Increasing the depth of the specified electrical duct bank will avoid extensive excavation and supporting work on the future SP2000-61 project. Work included increasing the depth of the duct bank by 2 feet for a length of 60 feet and providing necessary shoring and supports. A 28<lay time extension was necessary to design the new alignment, procure conduit fittings, and complete work on this change. This item was on the critical path of the construction schedule and delayed completion of the project. Cost for this change was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)a of the General Provisions. Time delays were negotiated pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No.4 and Urbantec's Letter Dated June 12, 2002, ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,579.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 28 Calendar Days ITEM 3: MODIFY FLOWMETER CONTROL PANEL AND REMOTE I/O PANEL This item includes costs for labor, material, and equipment to modify the flowmeter control panel and remote 1/0 panel. Modifications include: A. Provide glass windows to the flowmeter panel for viewing flowmeter readings. Windows were added for Operations staff to view the flowmeter readings without opening the panel. Opening the flowmeter panel repeatedly could compromise the NEMA 4X rating of the flowmeter panel. Cost of this change is $6,965.00. B. The design drawings showed the RIO panel to be installed inside the sampler building. During the submittal review process District staff determined that installing the RIO panel outside the sampler building would provide for better access for Operations and Maintenance staff inside the sampler building. The RIO panel rating was upgraded from NEMA 4 to NEMA 4X and sunshields were added to the doors of the RIO panel to make them suitable for outside use. Cost of this change is $12,023.00. C. Indicating lights, push buttons,and a fluorescent light were added to the RIO panel to meet the District's standards. Cost of this change is$2,500.00. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a)of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 7 and Urbantec's Letter Dated August 12, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $21,488.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days J 4 Page 3 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Five 5 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No.2. Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers ITEM 4: CONCRETE WALKWAY AND REINFORCEMENT ADDITIONS This Rem includes costs for labor, material, and equipment to construct a new walkway and add reinforcement to the light pole foundation. Work included the following: A. Construct a new walkway from curb to the flowmeter stairwells: This concrete walkway will provide a stable path and enable access to the flowmeter stairwells for O and M staff during rainy season and inclement weather. Cost of this change is $7,884.00. B. Add rebar to light pole foundation: Additional rebar was added because the size of the light pole footing was increased from the design dimensions of WNW'to 36'x36'. The footing dimensions were revised because the exact size and weight of the light pole was not known during the design phase. Cost of this change is$2,149.00. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a)of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 8 and Urbantec's Letter Dated August 16, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,033.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $48,114,00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 28 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 > ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272M127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Five 5 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 28-day extension of time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 18, 2000 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 16, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 28 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 540 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 720 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: September 7, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: September 7, 2002 Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 465,073.00 This Change (Add) (De9ust) $ 48,114.00 Amended Contract Price $1,459,187.00 4 Page 5 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Five 5 Date: December 18, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2. Job No.J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: December 18, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, Engineering and Construction Manager Date Approved by. David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by Urbantec Engineers, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS:003731337 PDC COMMITTEE Mee12/OS/02Ong Date TG Bd.or qr. 12/18/02 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number item NumbP PDCO2-91 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Marc Brown, Engineering Data Management Specialist SUBJECT: TRUNK SEWER MAPPING PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 1-98 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for the Trunk Sewer Mapping Project, Contract No. 1-98, providing for additional mapping services for an additional amount of$163,126, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,353,391. SUMMARY • The objective of this project is to create accurate maps of all of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)trunk sewer lines, and to collect information about these sewers. The graphic information will be used to produce map books to assist District staff in locating assets in the field. The tabular information will be used to update the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) to assist District staff when conducting maintenance on these assets. • Due to the size and complexity of the project, additional support by the consultant is required. These services include: 1. Identifying, copying and resolving issues related to record drawings. 2. Capturing additional attributes associated with record drawings 3. Attending additional technical and follow up meetings. 4. Drafting diversion structures and adding to the map books. 5. Adding additional land features. • The electronic maps created under, Trunk Sewer Mapping Project, Contract No. 1-98 can be used as the basis for the District's Geographic Information System. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$163,126 for Consultant, Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is requested. Funds will need to be reallocated from the Contingency to Consultant PSA budget. See attached Budget Information Table. Gwgedup•keBwa qyp y flgvlsSN2 BwN Pge Y fleartf\I]OSYem iHnl lae.ax fly: •\� Page 1 1 Brown and Caldwell has been requested to provide a quotation for additional work to document the location of local sewer connections to Orange County Sanitation District's trunk sewers. This work effort (Proposed Addendum No. 4) is estimated between $200,000 and $300,000, and would be brought to the PDC Committee for approval in February 2003. Addendum No. 4 is expected to be the final Addendum to complete the Trunk Sewer Mapping Project. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 2002/03, Section 8, Page 57: Capital Improvement Program, Collections Facilities, Trunk Sewer Mapping Project, Contract No. 1-98) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No increase in the Project Budget is recommended. A transfer of$163,126 from the Contingency Budget is shown in the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following is a breakdown of the Proposed Addendum No. 2: 1. Obtain record drawings. Effort required identifying and copying the Tiff drawings from EDMS to be used for this project. ($2,550) 2. Resolve EDMS Indexing/Incomplete Projects. Effort required resolving missing and incomplete projects. ($11,475) 3. Collect Title Block (Design) Date and Record Drawing Date. Effort required to capture additional attributes associated with record drawings. ($5,100) 4. Modify Field Name. Effort required change existing installation date labels. ($2,400) 5. Technical Meeting. Effort, both actual and estimated to attend additional technical and follow up meetings. ($52,500) 6. Link Diversion Structures to Manhole Data. Effort required to link diversion structures to the Manhole ID utilizing a blank field. ($1,536) 7. Modify Base Map Features. Effort required adding additional land features to the TSMP base map. ($25,000) 8. Add Diversion Structures. Effort required drafting diversion structures and adding to the map books. ($46,048) 9. Develop Hyperlink Functionality. Effort required hyper linking adjacent map book pages within the Electronic Map Book. ($4,772) 10. Add City Boundaries. Effort required adding city boundaries to the map book pages. ($1,584) G NI/OWINpeMa Mall RppapVCC119B M iX150$Gtt Page 2 11. Add Service Area Boundaries Labels. Effort required adding service area boundary labels to the map book pages. ($1,584) 12. Modify Index Sheet to Show Pump Stations. Effort required adding pump stations to the map book index sheet. ($2,640) 13. Modify Map Book Presentation. Effort required modifying the map book presentation format after the map book templates were completed. ($4,152) 14. Convert Force Main Schematic. Effort required adding service area 5 force main schematic to the map books. ($425) 15. Edit Base Map. Effort required editing the Orange County Public Facilities and Resource Department parcel data. ($1,360) ALTERNATIVES Not collecting correct information on the sewers. This option could lead to mistakes and inefficient operations of the sewer system due to inaccurate information. CEQA FINDINGS The project prepares paper and electronic data and is categorically exempt from CEQA. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report MAB:sa G:Wg1obe1Wgend8 Deft Repat51PDQ01-9B AR 120402AM G:vAyeE/NY+Ma paX fle.OebNOL,1-98M t1055].0oc �: �� Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Trunk Sewer Mapping Project Contract No. 1-98 ORIGINAL.: CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUMbs" THIS '.� - PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJEOTITASK' " AUTHORIZED` PROJEOTS SUPbkT." REvI$Eb i 1 AUTH6KI29b .AUTHOlt&Tiow' TOTAL EXRERDITWE EXPENDEb BUDGET BUDGET: INDREASE BUDGET; TO DATE' .REQUEST AUTHORIZATION, TODATE TO DATE(%) Project Development Studles/Pennittin Consultant PSA $ 1,190,265 $ 163,126 $ 1,353.391 $ 1.190265 $ 163.126 $ 1,353,391 $ 770274 57% Design Staff $ 310.000 $ 310.000 $ 310,000 $ 310,000 $ 176.000 57% Construction Contract $ 288,000 Construction Administration $ 67,000 Construction Inspection Contingency $ 7,000 $ 208.735 $ 163,128 $ 45.609 PROJECTTOTAL $ 362,000 $ 1,709,000 $ 1,709,000 $ 1,500,265 $ 163,126 $ 1,663,391 $ 946,274 57% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 362,000 1 $ 1.709,000 1 $ 1.709,000 11 $ 1,500,265 1 $ 163.128 $ 1,663,391 $ 946,274 57% C:T1l0NetWlPg1-e9 Budget Tebte.110502A81Dlslricic EMS:W37426M a Professional Services Agreement Status Report Trunk Sewer Mapping Project Contract No. 1-98 Total Project Budget: $1,709,000 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Start Date of Project: May 21, 2001 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs 4/25/01 Original PSA Development of paper and electronic $1,166,000 $1,166,000 trunk sewer maps of the District Service Area. 5124/02 Addendum 1 Additional enhancements that were not $24,265 $1,190,265 included in the Scope of Work. Pending Addendum 2 Additional effort required to meet project $163.126 $1,353,391 objective and not identified in Scope of Work. EDMS 003742672 PDC COMMITTEE Meetlng Daee rn aE.or Dr. 12/05/02 12/la/02 AGENDA REPORT IternNUMW Item Number PDCO2-92 13(D Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PLANT REINVENTION/AUTOMATION PROJECT, JOB NO. J-42 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 11 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc., for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Job No. J-42, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of$186,977, increasing the total amount not to exceed $9,655,793. SUMMARY Background: • Job No. J-42, the Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, was created to capture and implement good ideas for reinventing and automating our treatment plants. Reinvention is expected to solve several operations, maintenance, and regulatory compliance problems, as well as reduce costs and increase reliability. • The Plant Automation/Reinvention Project is divided into four phases: Phase 1 collected the reinvention ideas. Phase 2 evaluated the reinvention ideas and selected the ideas with an acceptable payback for implementation. The final report for Phase 2 will be delivered December 16, 2002. Over 2,100 reinvention ideas were generated in Phase 1 workshops. Approximately half of the ideas were rejected for various reasons. Most of the remaining valid reinvention ideas were merged into existing projects for evaluation. • Thirty reinvention ideas with a construction cost of$3,001,339 and an aggregate payback period just over five years will be constructed using J-42 budget. The Orange County Sanitation District will reap a present worth benefit or$15,697,904 from this effort. Phase 3 Design will begin in April, 2003 and Phase 4 construction will begin in May, 2004. • The project was planned and budgeted with several addenda because of the uncertainty of the quantity and nature of reinvention ideas that would come forth from the reinvention workshops; and to allow the Board of Directors close and periodic oversight of progress over the long term of the project. -1- Proposed Addendum No. 11 This proposed Addendum No. 11 to Job No. J-42 addresses five issues that must be resolved to properly close out Phase 2 of the project: 1. Develop 178 additional Instrumentation Loop Diagrams to complete the Instrumentation documentation set. 2. Provide Computer Aided Design training for the Orange County Sanitation District Plant Design System (PDS) administrator. 3. Develop the methods and procedures for updating plant information from construction record drawings and documents. 4. Develop a tool for reviewing Capital Improvement Project design submittals to determine their completeness. This tool will be a database that scans each design document, brings the equipment and instrument identification tags into a single table, then generates reports that the engineer uses to spot missing or inconsistent information in the contract documents. 5. Provide an additional 500 permanent equipment tags to complete the physical tagging of all plant assets. The budget for Addendum No. 11 is $186,977. The sum of$108,983 will be used to resolve known problems, Item No. 1 and a portion of Item No. 4. The balance of $77,994 will be used to complete Item No. 2, 3, 5, and part of Item No. 4 as needed. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of an additional $186,977 for the Consultant Professional Services Agreement budget is requested, increasing the total authorization to $9,655,793. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CAA) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) An increase in the Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA) budget from $9,468,816 to $9,655,793 is being requested by transferring $186,977 from the Contingency budget to the Consultant PSA budget. No increase in the overall project budget is necessary. See the attached Budget Information Table for further information. -2- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Overview The Plant Automation and Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42, was created to: (1) Develop documentation for the existing automation and controls systems; (2) Provide a workshop format for the reinvention of plant operation and automation; and (3) Develop and implement plant automation to an optimum level. Through this project, the operation and maintenance of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)two treatment plants will be reinvented to: • Provide Operations with data that is currently not available, which will allow optimal process control and operation. • Provide Maintenance with information to better manage and maintain plant equipment and controls. • Reduce operating costs through more efficient chemical usage and reduced staffing levels by application of automation and centralized monitoring and control. • Provide for a more efficient and cost-effective design process due to the development of accurate and up-to-date information about existing plant conditions. • Bring the District in compliance with OSHA regulatory requirements for lockout, tag- out documentation requirements. The Plant Automation/Reinvention Project is divided into four phases: • Phase 1 gathers reinvention/automation ideas. The plant control system is documented and reinvention ideas are compiled in this phase. Phase 1 is complete; over 2,000 ideas for improvements have been generated and categorized in Phase 1. • Phase 2 evaluates the ideas and selects the ideas that provide an acceptable benefit for the cost. This addendum provides funds to close out and complete Phase 2. • Phases 3 and 4 include the detailed design and construction of ideas that yield a payback of 5 to 7 years. Phase 1 Documentation and Reinvention Workshops: The control systems are field-checked and documented in drawings called Process & Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs), Instrumentation Loop Diagrams (ILDs), Control Logic Diagrams (CLDs), and Instrumentation and Equipment Data Sheets. Next, the District teams responsible for an area are brought together with outside experts in a series of workshops to generate as many improvement ideas for the area as possible. The workshop approach has been far more successful in creating ideas than was anticipated —over 2,100 reinvention ideas came out of Phase 1. Phase 1 is complete. Idea Categorization Process: All workshop ideas are then submitted to the District Categorization Committee for categorization. The Categorization Committee groups ideas in one of ten categories: General ideas affecting a department policy or procedure are sent to the appropriate department for action; Ideas involving health or safety -3- matters are sent to the Safety Department; Some ideas are not practical to implement r on existing facilities but are valid for future projects; these are embedded in the Orange County Sanitation District (District) Design Guidelines or the District Master Specifications; Ideas that are unclear, unlikely to have a 7-year payback, or are comments are categorized "NO - GO" and are retumed to the originating group; Ideas that affect an area with a planned project or; Ideas that affect an area with an existing construction project are dropped into those projects to be evaluated as part of the project design process; Low-cost ideas that clearly meet the 7-year payback criteria are sent to the District Small Projects group for immediate implementation or through the work order system for implementation by the District maintenance crews; and Ideas where the payback is uncertain or Ideas that need further study to clarify them are processed by the J42 Benefit/Cost Process. Idea categorization is complete. Phase 2 Benefit/Cost Process: The benefit/cost process enables the District to define and select the most cost-effective ideas that have a payback of 5 to 7 years or less. Ideas with an acceptable payback are developed by this process into Preliminary Engineering Assessment Reports (PEARs). The PEARs are roughly equivalent to the Preliminary Design Reports (PDR) required of all design projects and support the Phase 3 Design and Phase 4 Construction of the J-42 project. Approximately 2,100 reinvention ideas were produced in the Phase 1 workshops. Of the 2,100 ideas, about half the ideas were not implemented for various reasons. Most of the remaining 1,000 ideas were delegated to existing projects for evaluation and incorporation into the project design. Thirty reinvention ideas have acceptable benefit/cost ratios but are for plant areas that will not be rehabilitated during the next five years. These ideas will be designed and constructed using J-42 funds and are shown below; idea details are available in the J42 Reinvention Idea database: WS No.or Design/ Present Payback Period Process Area Subtotal Construction ($$) worth (Years) Liquid Stream Ideas 11-258 3405 41,921 1.3 11-050 17.89e 145,973 2.0 " 11-053 79067 196,738 6.3 " 11-233 22672 137,543 2.e " 11-299 4692 41,876 1.8 12-047 152.339 399.685 6.0 12-116 46,800 234,085 3.1 " 12-163 24 752 89,651 4.3 " 12-180 8 320 15.620 8.3 12-335 43 680 286,951 2.4 " 21.063 1 038 6,623 2.4 " 11-311 29 952 45.066 10A Liquid Stream Ideas 12 $420,758 $1,641,731 3.9 Total DI eater Ideas 15-031 611.520 1,105,985 8.6 " 15-037 82,400 305,888 3.2 " 15-034 765.440 7,823.779 1.5 " 15-035 457,6001 782,698 9.1 -4- , WS No.or Design/ Payback Period Process Area We Subtotal Construction(S$) Worth (Years) " 154M 5.200 15,620 5.2 25-015 51,168 115,725 6.9 25-079 14,560 96,574 2.4 25-080 310,960 1.755,386 2.8 Digester Ideas 8 $2,278,848 $12,001,413 5.27 Total DewateringlCenGen Ideas DewatednglCenGen 16-121 5,616 116,263 0.8 Ideas 26-117 7,280 15,720 7.2 " 28-065 6,240 54,795 1.8 18-052 95,680 439,998 3.4 18-021 15,600 139,409 1.7 16-021 86,560 1 150,952 6.9 " 26-135 3.245 38,575 1.3 18-037 88,192 302,303 4.6 18-023 51000 15,745 5.0 18-040 8,320 781,000 0.2 DewateringlCenGen 10 301,733 $2,054,760 6.81 Ideas Total Grand Total: 30 Ideas $3.001,339 $15,697,904 5.23 The total construction cost to implement the thirty reinvention ideas is $3,001,339. The present worth of the benefits derived from these ideas is $15,697,904; this represents a payback of just over 5 years. Design and Construction: The Preliminary Engineering Assessment Reports (PEAR) provide enough detail for the Orange County Sanitation District (District) consultants to proceed with detailed design, and then construction, via the normal District design and construction mechanisms. The PEAR replaces the engineering design effort that normally culminates in the Preliminary Design Reports (PDR). This reduces the overall design cost by approximately 10% by eliminating the preliminary engineering effort required to generate the PDR. This Addendum No. 11: Five issues will be resolved by this addendum: 1. Over 5,000 Instrumentation Loop Diagrams (ILD)were generated by this project as part of the documentation effort. These ILDs are used by District technical staff to troubleshoot the instruments and the field wiring. This addendum will add 178 ILDs required to complete plant documentation. 2. The District is in the process of hiring a Plant Design System administrator to manage the Instrumentation & Control drawings and documents, and maintain the specialized software used to create the intelligent drawings. The new employee must be trained in the configuration of the District system. The allocated hours for -5- this effort will vary depending on the background and skills of the employee so the funds will be released as needed. 3. The District now maintains historical information on the process control system through the documentation efforts of project J-42. The method and procedures for keeping this information current have not been established. This project element will establish the methods and procedures to be followed to keep the historical documents current. 4. It is difficult to review construction documents for consistency. Over 20 different types of drawings and documents make up a construction document set. Some instruments and equipment must appear on multiple documents. For example, a solenoid valve must, at a minimum, appear and be correctly identified in nine different documents. This project element will create a quality control database to track the instruments and equipment and verify the devices appear in the appropriate documents. This will increase the quality of our construction documents and reduce construction change order costs by eliminating drawing discrepancies. It will also reduce the amount of time the engineer spends in reviewing the drawings, allowing a better review in other, more important areas. 5. A major portion of the Plant Reinvention effort has been synchronizing the Process Control System, Computer Maintenance Management System, Financial System, Lock out—Tag out Procedures, field tags, and Engineering documentation. Part of this effort is to physically tag Orange County Sanitation District (District) assets with the common tag identification. Over 70,000 physical tags have been installed. This project element will fund 500 additional tags for equipment identification and will complete the tagging effort. ALTERNATIVES No other alternatives have been identified as this project represents the recommendations of the DART process. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the Strategic Plan EIR, certified by the District's Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29. 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report JKT:jo:sa G:XW91obaK44end8 Draft Repo6v DCU42 AR Addendum No. 11.doc -6- BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Plant Reinvention/Automation Project, Addendum No. 11 Job No. J-42 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED :FUNDS THIS PROPOSED -ESTIMATED ESTIMATED' PROJECTMASK : IAUTHORIZED. - PROJECT.,. BUDGET' REWBED w . AUTHORREO AUTHORIYATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE. FXOEN096: BUDGET- BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REOUEBT AUTHOPJZA71ON TO'DATE TO DATE(%)" Project Develo ent $ 185,180 $ 258,000 $ 258,000 $ 258,000 $ 258,000 $ 229,831 89% Studies/Permittng $ 2.000.000 $ 2.219,278 $ 2.219,276 $ 2,219,278 $ 2.219,276 $ 1,959,887 88% Consultant PSA $ 4,383,400 $ 9,468,816 $186.077 $ 9,655793 $ 9,468.816 $188977 $ 9.655.793 $ 8.054822 83% Des' n Staff $ 2,961.531 $ 1145,000 $ 1.145.000 $ 0% Construction Contract $ 8,696,472 $ 9.844.000 $ 9.844.000 $ 0% Construction Administration $ 600,000 $ 785,000 $ 785,000 $ 0% Constructon Inspection $ 2.030.000 $ 597,000 $ 597.000 $ 0% Contingent $ 4,903,417 $ 1.549.126 $ 186,977 $ 1,362,149 $ - 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 25,760,000 $ 25,866,218 $ - $ 25,888,218 $ 11,946,092 $ 186.977 $ 12,133,069 $ 10,244,540 84% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 25,760,000 1 $ 25,866,218 1 $ - $ 25.866.218 1 1 $ 11,946,092 $ 186,977 $ 12.133,069 1 $ 10,244,540 1 647 1,:1 I.d woft.n %udOd rode Fann RM.W Od.4,2000 Professional Services Agreement Status Report PLANT REINVENTION/AUTOMATION PROJECT JOB NO. J-42 Total Project Budget: $25,760,000 Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Start Date of Project: May 27, 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 5/27/98 Original J-42 is the Plant Reinvention and Automation $q 383,400 $4,383,400 PSA Project that will Increase plant automation to an optimum level. It is a capital project that will implement physical changes to the plant process control systems and equipment to support both O erations and Maintenance 4/1/99 1` Provide facilitator for Area 10/20 Workshop 1 $16,500 $4,399,900 7/21/99 2 Additional Miscellaneous Services $80,537 $4,480,437 7/21/99 3 Plant Tagging Services $616,393 $5,096,830 10/26/99 4' Correction to Agreement Language $0 $5,096,830 4/26/00 5 Virtual Tags $420,000 $5,516,830 7/19/00 6 Phase 2 Vision and Goals $82,763 $5,599,593 8/23100 7 Drawing Count Adjustment $1.896.186 $7,495,779 4/25/01 8 Liquid Stream Benefit/Cost Analysis $240,945 $7,736,724 9/26/01 9 Digester Benefit/Cost Analysis and Miscellaneous $1,625,874 $9,362,598 2/28l02 10 CenGen/Utilities Benefit/Cost Analysis $106,218 $9,468,816 Pending 11 Five J-42 close-out activities $186,977 $9,655,793 " GM Approval G:NIpIopaM ,o@all Re s%PMUA2 M Addendum No.1 lom Rowsad:U10W Page 7 PDC COMMITTEE MmUng Date I To So.of Dr. 12/5/02 12/18/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCO2A3 13(D Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Pam Koester, Project Manager SUBJECT: HEADWORKS IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for design of Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount not to exceed $2,600,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $15,877,372. SUMMARY • The Headworks at Plant No. 2 has been expanded and modified by more than 40 different projects over the past 30 years. There are a number of Headworks components requiring major rehabilitation, replacement, automation and safety/seismic upgrades. • The Orange County Sanitation District (District) awarded a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)to Carollo Engineers for the design of Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66 in August 2001. Additional design elements have been identified for the new Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2 through a Value Engineering Evaluation of the Preliminary Design, results of the Odor Control Master Plan, and more detailed analysis of current design elements during final design. • District staff recommends that Addendum No. 5 be issued to Carollo Engineers for the addition of these design elements to the Final Design in an amount not to exceed $2,600,000. This is being requested now in order to avoid a two month delay in design and construction of the additional design elements. Delays could translate into additional project costs especially during construction. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Approval of Addendum No. 5 is being requested in an upper limit amount not to exceed $2,600,000. It is requested that the consultant fees for Addendum No. 5 be moved from Contingency to the Consultant PSA budget as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. The Table reflects an increase of$2,600,000 in the Consultant PSA budget. The actual amount to be moved will be negotiated by the General Manager with Carollo Engineers. G\w ,db'egmda�dAgen=ReytM02E rd Are ReWSMONem 1301 P2£e dm Reed, W10W Page 1 It is also requested that$179,000 be authorized for Orange County Sanitation District (District)staff involvement in Studies. J BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CIP Budget Section 8, Page 57) ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This Rem has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The attached Budget Information Table indicates a transfer of$2,600,000 from Contingency to Consultant PSA and $179,000 from Contingency to Studies. The proposed budget request does not impact the project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background On August 22, 2001, the Board of Directors approved Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with Carollo Engineers in the amount of $12,628,299 for the design of a new 340 mgd headworks at Plant No. 2, increasing the total PSA fee to $13, 277,372. The negotiated budget was based on a detailed scope of work and delineation of project elements described in the Preliminary Engineering Report dated October, 2000. At that time, the estimated construction cost was $108 million. Value Engineering Workshop The Preliminary Design Report (PDR)for the new headworks project, Job No. P2-66, was completed in June, 2002. A Value Engineering Workshop was conducted in May of 2002 to validate the proposed project elements and determine if there is any potential cost saving measures that could be incorporated into the design. The recommended design modifications resulting from this Workshop are estimated to save approximately $4-5 million in construction cost. District staff recommends that Carollo Engineers be compensated for making the following recommended modifications to the design as a result of the Value Engineering Workshop: • Revise influent diversion and metering structure layout to eliminate Newport trunk meter and raise meters to reduce depth of structure. This modification assumes that the Board of Directors will approve the relocation of the Newport Trunk sewer into Pacific Coast Highway at a future date. Space will be set aside to redesign the structure if the sewer relocation is not approved. • Relocate the bar screen isolation gates outside of the building and shorten the channels. • Use a water sluiceway in lieu of shaftless screw conveyors for conveyance of screenings. This will necessitate the design of two separate buildings instead of one. c:niywuwpem.ova M, • lns xa..+m: wl . Page 2 • Revise the design of the influent pump station to reduce the length of the influent pump suction piping. • Include the pump station discharge side in the physical modeling. • Eliminate installed standby grit pumps and reduce the size of the pump room. • Revise the site layout to switch locations of the Electrical Building and ferric chloride facility and relocate the odor control facilities. This will necessitate additional geotechnical investigations (i.e., borings)to support the structural design of the new headworks. • Revise electrical design to feed 12 KV power directly to the variable frequency drives. Odor Control Facilities to Suuoort Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-66 A series of meetings were held between June and August of 2002 with Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff to determine what recommendations from the Odor Control Master Plan, dated July 31, 2002, would be incorporated into P2-66. The final recommendations require significantly more stringent environmental controls on the air emissions from the new headworks than is currently being done (i.e.,two stage chemical scrubbers instead of one stage). This will increase the original design effort for these facilities. In order to facilitate construction of the new odor control facilities for the new headworks, District staff recommends that the required new trunk line scrubbers be added to P2-66. These recommendations are estimated to increase the odor control facility costs from $13.2 million to $36.9 million based on the current estimated midpoint of construction. Additional Desian Elements In order to more effectively coordinate the construction of the new headworks with other District projects, District staff recommends that the following additional design elements be added to Job No. P2-66: • Provide a bleach feed point at the primary influent splitter box. • Provide a sophisticated sampling facility at the new grit chambers. • Modify the existing recycle return system from the existing headworks to the new headworks. Modify the Inlet of Distribution Structure A. G:NIpIOE•NpOMi VIA�wOL AqE t050]Ae[ : VIM Page 3 Design Cost Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff is currently working with Carollo Engineers to finalize the scope of work and budget for the additional tasks described in this Agenda Report. District staff has come to an agreement with Carollo Engineers on the scope of work and fee for the following additional project elements: • GeotechnicalInvestigations- $12,500 • Odor Control Life Cycle Cost Analysis - $36,655 • Value Engineering Redesign - $214,500 An estimated upper limit for the other project elements described in this Agenda Report that are still being discussed with Carollo Engineers is $2,340,000. The District has also identified a number of tasks that will not be completed as part of the scope of work. These costs will be subtracted from the additional design costs to determine the net increase in design costs for Carollo Engineers. Construction Schedule Construction sequencing for the new headworks will be quite complex because of the need for close coordination with other construction projects at both Plant Nos. 1 and 2. In addition, construction must be done in such a way as to not affect the District's ability to operate the treatment plant and to meet its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. The estimated construction schedule has been modified several times since project inception in both length and starting point for the following reasons: • The final design phase began 4 months later than expected due to lengthy design contract negotiations with Carollo Engineers. • Based on the scope of work approved after the completion of the Conceptual Design, the design effort is estimated to take 9 months longer than originally anticipated. • At least 2 additional months may be needed to incorporate Value Engineering comments into the Final Design. More time may also be needed to complete the design of additional project elements described in this Agenda Report. • Based on more detailed design information and an analysis of construction sequencing issues, the construction period may be lengthened by as much as 6 months plus an additional 14 months to complete a complex startup procedure. The midpoint of construction, upon which the construction cost is based, has increased from June of 2005 to April of 2007 based on available information. It is expected that project completion may be further delayed depending on the project elements added to the project and a resolution of the following major issues: Implementation of the ammonia toxicity short term solution. C+'MyWtlW 0. RgcmTpP MA¢ R¢ 1� R`"•`" wi" Page 4 • Need to transport and return soil to the site because of space limitations. • Feasibility of adding infrastructure facilities to support the secondary treatment expansion. • Method to upgrade the existing storm drain system. District ability to implement proposed construction sequencing plan. Construction Cost The revised construction schedule as well as additional project elements will increase the construction cost. The construction cost is expected to increase over the Conceptual Design estimate of$108 estimate (with no contingency) for the following reasons: • A longer construction schedule and expected project delays described above under Construction Schedule. • More complex odor control facilities than originally anticipated and addition of trunk line scrubbers to the project. • Structural design modifications based on the recommendations of the geotechnical report (i.e., use of mat foundations instead of piles). • More extensive yard piping and bypass pumping as a result of a detailed construction sequencing analysis. Based on these factors, the current estimated construction cost (Preliminary Design Report) is $145.3 million or a $37.3 million increase over the previous estimate. The addition of more complex headworks odor control facilities due to stringent environmental requirements and trunk line odor control facilities represent approximately$24 million of this increase. The remaining $13.3 million is due to other reasons listed above and more detailed design information. The construction cost will be increased further with the addition of the design elements (other than odor control facilities) described in this Agenda Report. Summary At this time, Orange County Sanitation District(District) staff recommends that Addendum No. 5 be issued to Carollo Engineers for the additional project elements described in this Agenda Report. In order to minimize any further project delays, District staff recommends that the General Manager be authorized to negotiate with Carollo Engineers for all project elements described in this Agenda Report and to award Addendum No. 5. The analysis of the construction schedule and budget are provided to the Board of Directors as Information Items only. There are several major decisions that need to be emimoemw sore'ud-+- "2w Mend-w INW d� Ae Iw:VIM Page 5 made over the Final Design period that could have a major impact on the project schedule and, hence, the construction cost. As these decisions are made, Orange ; County Sanitation District (District) staff will recommend project budget adjustment to reflect the changes. Additional UP funds may be needed to cover the expected increase in construction costs. ALTERNATIVES The District could consider not approving the additional funds for the project, in which case, some of the facilities may not be designed within the existing budget. CEQA FINDINGS Replacement of the Plant No. 2 Headworks was not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR. A Supplement to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR is being prepared. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report MS:PK:sa G:utglobaaAgenda DnaR RepoftTDMP2-85 Agenda Repots 120502.doe a:N,e0NM9Wda Dnn RupmaWDW246 naenaa AaW 12M2.d. ftmw:a.,Drea Page 6 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2 JOB NO. P2-66 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 57.999 $ 72,000 $ 72,000 $ 73,000 $ 73,000 $ 62,072 85% StudieslPermitting $ 92,400 $ 196.000 1 $ 179,000 $ 375,0001 $ 196000 $ 179,000 $ 375,0001$ 339,425 91% Consultant PSA $ 360,301 $ 13,277,372 $ 2,600,000 $ 15,877,372 $ 13,277372 $ 2,600,000 $ 15.877,372 $ 4,187,006 26% Design Staff $ 90,100 $ 1.070,000 $ 1.070.000 $ 1,070,000 $ 1,070,000 $ 156,113 15% Construction Contract $ 1,799,600 $ 110.002,000 $ 110,002,000 Construction Administration $ 7,165,000 $ 7,165,000 Construction Inspection It 7.163,000 $ 7,163,000 Contingency $ 21,184,628 $ 2,779,000) $ 18,405,628 Reimbursable Costs TOTAL $ 2,400,400 1 $ 160.130.000 $ - $ 160,130,000 $ 14,616,372 $ 2,779,OOD $ 17.395,372 $ 4,744,616 27% EMS:0e3743e74 Note: Final Budget increase for consultant PSA may be less than that shown in this table. Professional Services Agreement Status Report Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2 Job No. 122-66 Total Project Budget: $160,130,000 Consultant: Carollo Engineers Start Date of Project: 8/1/99 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs [3/1/00 Original PSA Preliminary Engineering Report for the design of a new $375,000 $375,000 headworks at Plant No. 2 9/26/00 1 Additional engineering tasks-sewer hydraulic analyses $24.940" $399,940 and phone survey of vortex grit basin installations 9/26100 2 Additional engineering tasks—assistance in $24,980' $424,920 negotiations with equipment vendors and preparation of plans and specifications for pilot test equipment 11/15/00 3 Additional engineering tasks- evaluation of headworks $224,153 $649,073 alternatives and assistance during pilot plant studies 8/22101 4 Predesign, Design and Bidding Services for a new $12,628,299 $13,277,372 headworks at Plant No. 2 Pending 5 Additional Design Engineering Tasks $2,600,000' 15,877,372"' Approved by General Manager Final Cost may be reduced after Addendum is negotiated with Carollo Engineers EDMS 003743073 11/26/02 ReAwd 0&14198 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dale Ta Bd.0 N. 12/05/02 121 8102 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number PDO02-94 13(k) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Mike Larkin, Senior Process Engineer SUBJECT: SHORT-TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION PROJECT, JOB NO. J-87 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$500,000 for Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, for a total budget of$7,930,000; (2) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch Corporation for Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, providing additional engineering services in an amount of$450,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $897,920: (3)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the plans and specifications; (4) Receive and file letter dated November 27, 2002 from SS Mechanical Corporation, apparent low bidder, requesting to be relieved from their bid due to a mathematical error; (5)Approve the request of SS Mechanical Corporation to be relieved from their bid; (6) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; (7)Award a construction contract to J. F. SHEA Construction, Inc. for Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, for an amount not to exceed $4,298,247. SUMMARY • At the time of bid, SS Mechanical Corporation submitted a bid in the amount of $3,620,000. The other bids came in at $4,298,247, $4,516,000, $4,522,900, and $5 038,000. This bid is 19 percent below the average of the next three bidders. The 2nd low bidder is only 3 percent below this average. • Within three hours of the bid, SS Mechanical notified District staff that there was a significant mathematical error in the preparation of their bid. • Supporting documents provided to the District validate this mathematical error. A copy of this documentation was provided to General Counsel for review. General Counsel agreed with the consensus of District staff. • Staff recommends that the Short-Term Ocean Outall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. 87, be awarded to the second low bidder, J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., who has been identified as being the lowest responsive bidder, in an amount of $4,298,247. • In October 2002, the Consultant PSA budget was increased by$200,000 in anticipation of the expected level of effort due to expansion of the original scope of services. Subsequent to this action, it was determined that the actual level of effort to complete the final design is $307,609 (an increase over the anticipated budget of $107,609). The expanded budget includes increased project complexity, enhanced reliability, and expanded automation to reduce labor and chemical costs. The construction period was also increased to accommodate a traditional construction process. The construction period was extended by 175 days. This extension of time has increased the services during construction that are needed. This has increased the SDC budget by $142,391. The proposed Addendum Number 1 would increase the PSA amount by$450,000, for a total not to exceed $897,920. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$ 4,298,247 for the construction contract is being requested and authorization to approve Addendum No. 1 to the Design PSA with Black & Veatch in the amount of$450.000. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds ❑ This item has not been budgeted ❑ Not applicable (information item) A budget amendment of$500,000 is also requested to cover the increased costs associated with the design, construction contract, and construction inspection for the Project. Please refer to the budget information Table for more information. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • During the February Meeting, the Board of Directors (Board) authorized the General Manager to proceed with designing and implementing the Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87. The General Manager provided a presentation on and explained the need for the disinfection facilities. The Board authorized expenditures up to $200,000, so the project momentum would be maintained. • A detailed report on Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 was presented during the March Board of Director's meeting, as requested. In addition, the Board awarded a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $447, 920 to Black and Veatch Corporation for the design of the Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87. • On July 19, 2002, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) issued Order No. R8-2002-055, requiring the District to meet recreational water contact standards Page 2 in the ocean. The RWQCB required the District to implement a process of disinfection using bleach for reducing bacteria,followed by dechlorination using sodium bisulfite for achieving the new ocean discharge requirements. • In order to comply with the RWQCB Order and Orange County Sanitation District Board (District) direction, the Temporary Disinfection Facilities were designed and constructed on an expedited basis, and to only meet the typical building, electrical, and safety codes. Additionally, the temporary facilities do not meet the District's regular, high standards and requirements for reliability (quality) and redundancy (number of units). Therefore, the Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 must be constructed as soon as possible. • The District installed Temporary Disinfection Facilities and started up these facilities by the required August 12, 2002 date. Now the District has prepared complete plans and specifications for the installation of Permanent Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Facilities. This construction of the Permanent facilities are scheduled for completion in September 2003. • During the course of the bid period, three (3)addenda were prepared to clarify specific requirements associated with the Plans and Specifications. The addenda items were identified during reviews by the Consultant, the District staff, and questions raised by contractors during the Prebid Meeting that was held on November 19, 2002. By preparation of these addenda, the number and dollar value of construction change orders will be reduced. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives considered. CEQA FINDINGS Addendum No. 7 to the Strategic Plan Program Environmental Report (Certified October 27, 1999 and Notice of Determination Filed on October 29, 1999) was submitted to the Board of Directors on September 25, 2002 and at that meeting, the findings of Addendum No. 7 were moved, seconded and duly carried. ATTACHMENTS SS Mechanical Corp. Letter Budget Information Table Bid Tabulation MDL:sa:jo G,dj4d ed,a UIX Fep•t•P -87 M$had TtlT ON 11AW Page 3 v c c MECHANICAL CORP. V v SPECIALTY PIPING SYSTEMS GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR November 27, 2002 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: Michael D. Larkin, P.E. Reference: Job No. J-87, Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Short Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Subject: . Withdrawal of Bid Due to Math Error and Request for Return of Bid Bond Gentlemen: This letter confirms our telephone conversation with Michael Larkin on November 26, 2002 after the bid for the above referenced project. During that conversation, we indicated that a significant math error had been discovered. In our meeting with District staff at 2:00 p.m. on November 27, 2002, S.S. Mechanical provided documentation supporting the math error. As a result of the above, we request our bid be withdrawn and our bid bond be returned. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 714/847-1317. Sincerely, S Steven �p SS:mp 17631 Metzler Lane,Huntington Beach,California 92647-6244 • Bus.(714)647-1317 • Fax(714)847-6907 • Lic.686371 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction JOB NO. J-67 ORIGINAL CURRENT. PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS' THIS. PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT" 'BUDGET . REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZJMON' TOTAL . EXPENDITURE 'EXPECTED BUDGET BUDGET ' CREASEI DECREASE BUDGET TO DATE(-) -REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) D Project Devel era $ 320000 $ 150000 $ S 15D000 $ 150,000 S $ 150000 $ 125.000 $ 83.3% Studies/Permitfing S 500000 1 $ 600000 3 S 600000 S 600000 S $ 600000 1 $ 100000 6 16.7% Consultant PEA S BD0000 I S 900000 $ 250 $ 1150,000 S 900000 S 250.000. $ 1,150000 $ 725000 E 65.9% Design Staff 3Do000 $ 2D0000 s $ 200DOo ' s 200000 It $ 200000 S 200000 S 100.0% Isn IaNI) Construction Contras S 2 000 4760000 $ 2K00D $ 4950.000 4750.0D0 S 20000W S 4950000 S 600,000 $ 12.1% Construction Administration $ 0 S 20000D S $ 200000 It 200000 $ - S 200000 S 0 0 CpuWctlm Inspection 0 S 100000 S 150000 1 S 250000 I I S 1D0000 1 E 160000 1 S 250000 1 $ 0 1 S0 contingency S 580000 S 5100D0 S <100000> S 430000 S 0 It 0 0 0 S 0 PROJECT TOTAL S 5 000 $ 7430 ODD $: 500.000 $ 7930,000 $ 8900000 ,606000'', $ 7,500,00 E 1750000 $ 23.3% Reimbursable Costs $ $ $ $ $ S 1 E $ PROJECT NET $ 5.250,000 $ 7,430.000 1 $ 500.000 $ 7.930.000 $ 6.900,000 1 S 500;000_ $ 71500,000 1 $ 1.750,000 S 23.3% Note 1 The$4,950,000 includes$650,000 for Temporary Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Facilities constructed during Summer 2002 and$4,300,000 for the Permanent Short-Tem1 Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Facilities that were Bid on November 26,2002. 6 November 26, 2002 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA NOS. 1, 2, & 3: BID TABULATION SHORT TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION JOB NO. J-87 Engineer's Estimate: $3,800,000 Construction Contract Budget: $3,800,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. S.S. MECHANICAL (WITHDRAWN)' $ 3,620,000 2. J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 4,298,247 3. PACIFIC MECHANICAL CORPORATION $ 4.516,000 4. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 4,522.900 5. PRO CONTRACTING CORPORATION $ 5,038,000 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. in the bid amount of$4,298,247 as the lowest and best bid. 'Withdrawn due to significant mathemati e �4 David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering CAFileNetWIPVA7 Bid Tab.doc Revised 05119198 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain valley,CA 92728.8127 . (714) 962-2411 i The FAHR minutes of the meeting held December 11 , 2002 were not available for this mailing . These minutes will be distributed at the December 18, 2002 Board of Directors meeting. Once the minutes are finalized, they will also be available on the District's website (www.ocsd .com). Due to photocopying issues, the Treasurer's Report, Agenda Item No. 14(c), will be distributed at the December 18, 2002 Board of Directors meeting . Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience this may cause. If there are any questions, please contact Penny Kyle at (714) 593-7130. 1 M7"ng Date To ad of Dlr. �T FAHR COMMITTEE 12/ll/02 12/ia/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR02-112 14fdi Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources and Employee Development Originator: Denise Martinez, Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION 98-33. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-22, amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual, providing for adoption of Policy No. E90.00, Internet and Electronic Mail Usage. SUMMARY The attached policy is a routine update or addition to maintain consistent language with the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and/or new legislation or to explain procedures more clearly. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Polley Number and Subject From To Reason for Change Policy language incorporated E60.00/ntemet Usage Current Language. Delete Policy E60.00. into new lntemetIE-mall policy E90.00. Policy language incorporated E70.00 E-mail Usage Current Language. Delete Policy E70.00. into new InlemetIE-mail policy E90.00. E90.00 Internet and Electronic N/A New Policy. Clarification of procedures and Mall Usage �' policy. cAwo daagendatRadnd Agenda Repots@002 amrd Agenda ReOMMOZNenn wId)HR PaP dad Ra,aed. VMS Page 1 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Policy E90.00, Internet and Electronic Mail Usage Gftp.dwWWndaTAHMFAHR300D 2 AWndm WWn02.14.HR PAP do R"W WI MB Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-XX AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING THE HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That Exhibit"A"of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by deleting Policy No. E60.00, Internet Usage, set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: That Exhibit"A"of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by deleting Policy No. E70.00, E-mail Usage, set forth in Attachment No. 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: That Exhibit"A"of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by adding Policy No. E90.00, Internet and Electronic Mail Usage, set forth in Attachment No. 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 6: That all other terms and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be made by Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 18, 2002. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary C:0D m ras and Seldngs\kylell.ocel Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK48RDEC 02 BOARD-RESOLUTION-PP Update 12-02. 02.doe Orange County Policy Number: E90.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: December 19, 2002 Subject: INTERNET AND ELECTRONIC Supersedes: E60.00 Internet Usage and MAIL USAGE E70.00 E-mail Usage Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1. To establish policies and procedures for the use of the District's computer resources, including Internet and electronic mail Ce-mail")systems,by District Employees and to establish policies and procedures for the retention of e-mail as District records. Computer resources also include all hardware, software,and computer files. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1. This policy applies to all District employees using the District's computer resources, e-mail system,and Internet services in the performance of their job duties("employees"), as well as to all other persons, such as employees of independent contractors(contract or temporary employees),consultants, appointed officials, authorized volunteers,special committee members,and other persons("other users")who are authorized to use the District's computer resources in the performance of District business. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1. Attachment: An application specific file, such as a Word or Excel document that is transported with an e-mail message. The recipient must have suitable software for viewing the attachment. 32. E-mail: A message, possibly with attachments,composed on a computer and received by a computer. A network, potentially including the Internet, is the transmission medium. 3.3. Internet: A worldwide network of computers, adhering to universal standards that are capable of exchanging data with each other. 4.0 POLICY 4.1. GENERAL INFORMATION 4.1.1. Internet services and e-mail are unique mediums that are viewed by most users as being different from traditional written correspondence or telephone communication. One of the greatest dangers of the use of Internet services and e-mail is that they are treated far more informally than other forms of business communication. Due to the perceived impermanence of Internet communications and e-mail messages, employees and other users often use them to express sentiments and Page 1 of 10 opinions they would never memorialize in traditional business writing. In drafting any Internet communication or e-mail message,employees and other users should exercise care and diligence as such communications reflect on the District and the employee's department. As such, employees and other users should always conduct themselves in a professional manner and should refrain from sending anything by way of Internet communications or e-mail messages that should not appear in an official memorandum or letter. 4.1.2. The District's computer resources are provided for the purpose of conducting District business,enhancing efficiency, and better serving the public interest. Internet services and e-mail are business communication tools that are made available to certain District employees and other users In order to enhance efficiency and effectiveness in the performance of job duties and District-related business and are to be used in accordance with state and federal laws, and this Policy. The e- mail system may not be used to solicit or persuade others for commercial ventures, religious or political causes,outside organizations, or other non-job-related solicitations. 4.1.3. The District's computer resources, regardless of their physical location or the form in which they are maintained,are the exclusive property of the Orange County Sanitation District. Employees and other users are provided access to the District's computer resources as authorized by the General Manager, Department Directors and/or the Information Technology Director(IT Director). 4.1.4. Use of the District's computer resources, including Internet and e-mail communications, and Internet webs0es visited, should be predominantly for the accomplishment of business-related tasks and/or directly pertain to District business, administration,or practices. 4.1.5. Employees should be aware that all records,whether on paper or computerized, are subject to the mandatory public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act,subject to the specific exceptions provided under the Act. The Information created or transmitted on any District computer resource, including Internet communications and e-mail messages, may be subject to public disclosure under the California Public Records Act or in connection with litigation. 4.1.6. Employees who are terminated or laid-off have no rights to the contents of their computer files or e-mail messages and are not allowed access to such systems. The District shall have the right to delete or retain any or all e-mail messages or computer files of a District employee who is no longer employed by the District. When an employee leaves District employment, it is the responsibility of the Department Director and the IT Director to ensure that access to the District's computer resources is terminated and all computer files are retained by the District. 4.1.7. The District prohibits sexual,racial,or other fors of harassment and the District's computer resources shall not be used for such purpose. If you are harassed or discriminated against through the use of the District's computer resources,you must report the act of harassment or discrimination to your immediate supervisor or Department Director immediately. If you feel uncomfortable doing so,or if your Immediate Page 2 of 10 supervisor or Department Director is the source of the harassment, condones the problem, or Ignores the problem, report the harassment to Human Resources. 4.1.8. The dissemination of derogatory, defamatory,obscene,disrespectful, sexually explicit,sexually suggestive or in any other way inappropriate Internet and/or e-mail communications is prohibited. For example,the District prohibits the display or transmission of sexually explicit Images, messages, or cartoons or any transmission or use of e-mail communications that contain ethnic slurs,racial epithets,or anything that may be construed as harassment or disparagement of others based on their race, national origin,color,sex,sexual orientation, age,disability, religious or political beliefs. Sending or forwarding a copy of these types of offensive communications on the District's computer system is prohibited. 4.1.9. Electronic snooping or tampering by any employee is prohibited. "Electronic snooping"is the unauthorized use of or attempt to use another employee's password without the employee's consent, or the unauthorized entry to or attempt to enter the computer files and communications of another without that person's consent, or the unauthorized entry or attempt to enter the encrypted storage of e-mail messages. 4.1.10. The District reserves the right for any reason to access,disclose or delete all messages and other electronic data sent over its electronic mail system or stored in Its files. 4.2. ACCESS TO COMPUTER INFORMATION/CONFIDENTIALITY 4.2.1. An employee's use of the District's computer resources, including, but not limited to,all computer files, Internet services,and e-mail, are not confidential. The District provides no assurance of privacy with respect to any employee or other user's use of any District computer resource, and the District expressly reserves the right to access or monitor,with or without notice,any employee or other user's use of the District's computer resources. 4.2.2. The District reserves the right to monitor and record individual employee and other user computer files,as well as Internet and e-mail usage,at any time as allowed by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. No employee or other user shall have any expectation of privacy as to his/her computer files, Internet communications, or e-mail messages. The District has software and systems in place that can and will monitor and record all usage for each and every user,including,but not limited to, all internal transmissions, Internet website visits, newsgroups,e-mail messages,computer files,and file transfers into and out of the District's internal network. District representatives may access, audit, and review all activity and analyze usage patterns,and may,for whatever reason, disclose this data to ensure that the District's computer resources are devoted to maintaining the highest level of efficiency and productivity. Page 3 of 10 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1. E-MAIL USAGE 5.1.1. E-mail should always be used with the assumption that a message will be read by someone other than its intended recipient. When transmitting e-mail messages,employees and other users should consider that the message, even though"deleted,"may later be disclosed to outside parties, members of the public,or in connection with litigation. Due to these concerns,employees and other users are required to maintain the highest standards of courtesy and professionalism when sending e-mail messages. 5.1.2. District employees shall have no right or expectation of privacy or confidentiality in any e-mail messages created, sent,received, deleted, or stored using the District's computer resources. Management and supervisors shall have the right to read and review any e-mail message created,sent, received,deleted, or stored of any employee at any time and for any reason. 5.1.3. Employees are expected to exercise good judgment in sending any e- mail communication,especially if such communication is deemed sensitive. All confidential communications should be in hard copy form and be filed and retained in accordance with the District's Records Retention Policy. 5.1.4. The sending of mass e-mailings on a"District-wide"basis to all employees without the prior authorization of a Department Director or the Communications Manager is prohibited. 5.1.5. Error on the side of caution. Whatever you write, assume the message Is permanent. It can be printedout and it may be retrievable. 5.1.6. Use appropriate language. Remember that as a system user, you are a representative of the Orange County Sanitation District. E-mail is a unique medium that is unlike traditional written correspondence, in that, while you may compose your e-mail transmission statement alone at your computer and that statement is intended for a single recipient,what you actually transmit can be viewed globally. 6.1.7. Transmitting a message under another employee's name or password without their permission is prohibited. Any employee who obtains a password or user identification must keep that password confidential. 5.1.8. Employees should regularly change their individual passwords. Employees shall not share individual passwords with other individuals except for legitimate District business reasons. 5.1.9. Employees shall not use,or attempt to use, another employee's password without the employee's consent. 5.1.10. All communications should follow proper etiquette, such as: Materials posted by District employees shall professionally represent the Orange County Sanitation District. The transmission of defamatory, obscene, offensive or harassing messages or messages Page 4 of 10 which disclose personal information without authorization is prohibited. • E-mail messages and electronic postings may be read by people beyond the addressee, and upon request may be produced to a court in connection with litigation and should be composed accordingly. 5.1.11. Employees should carefully consider the names on a mailing list as addressees or copies. Some employees may not want their e-mail addresses to be widely known or to receive responses to widely distributed messages. 5.2. RETENTION OF E-MAIL 5.2.1. E-mail generates correspondence and other documentation,which may be recognized as Official District Records in need of protection/retention in accordance with the California Public Records Act and as evidence in connection with litigation. Although the use of e-mail Is primarily for official District business,the e-mail system is intended as a medium of communication. Therefore,the e-mail system should not be used for the electronic storage or maintenance of documentation, including, but not limited to, Official District Records. 5.2.2. E-mail messages sent and received, Including any attachments,which can be considered an Official District Record, are to be stored in computer files or printed as a hard copy and fled in accordance with their Department's Filing Policy. Generally,the sender of the e-mail should be the person responsible for storing or printing and filing it accordingly. The persons responsible for a particular program or project file shall be responsible for retaining all e-mail they send or receive related to that program or project. 5.2.3. Individual employees are responsible for the management of their mailboxes and associated folders. In order to assure maximum efficiency in the operation of the e-mail system,employees are encouraged to delete e-mail messages that are not Official District Records from their in-boxes once they are no longer needed. If a hard copy of data,which constitutes an Official District Record,has been printed and filed in accordance with the District's Record Retention Policy and Schedule, the e-mail may be deleted. 5.2.4. It Is the responsibility of Individual employees and their Department Heads to determine if e-mail is an Official District Record which must be retained in accordance with the District's Record Retention Policy and Schedule. The District's Records Manager will assist you in making such a determination. You should keep in mind,however,that preliminary drafts, notes or interagency or intre-agency memoranda,which are not retained by the District in the ordinary course of business,are generally not considered to be Official District Records subject to disclosure. Employees are encouraged to delete documents,which are not otherwise required to be kept by law or whose preservation is not necessary or convenient to the discharge of your duties or the conduct of the District's business. Page 5 of 10 5.2.5. A record of additions and deletions made in the course of creating a draft letter or memorandum need not be saved. 5.2.6. Periodically, the District receives requests for inspection or production of documents pursuant to the California Public Records Act, as well as demands by subpoena or court order for the production of evidence in connection with litigation. In the event of such a request,the applicable Department Head shall require all employees to make available relevant e-mail files to the extent e-mail is stored in the computer and not printed and filed. The employee having control over e-mail files,once he/she is made aware of the request,shall immediately print and transmit a hard copy of any computer files that either are or may be responsive to the request or subpoena to his/her Department Head. 5.2.7. E-mail records that are Official District Records must be kept for the minimum retention period identified in the District's Record Retention Disposition Schedule. Such e-mail records may not be destroyed except after approval of the Division Manager, the District's Records Manager and General Counsel. 5.2.8. E-mail messages are subject to the same disclosure requirements as other public records. Requests from the public for e-mail records must be honored in the same manner as for other public records. E-mail messages,which are determined to be Official District Records must be accessible and retrievable during their entire retention period and are to be maintained in a manner which permits easy and timely retrieval. 5.3. ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS 5.3.1. Some messages sent, received or stored on the District e-mail system Will constitute confidential,privileged communications between the District and its attorneys. Attorney-client communications should not be forwarded without consulting the General Manager's office and/or the General Counsel's office. 5.4. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 5.4.1. Most communication among District employees is not considered confidential. However,certain communications,such as law enforcement investigations and personnel records, may be confidential or contain confidential information. Questions about whether communications are confidential should be discussed with the employee's supervisor. 5.4.2. Employees shall exercise caution in sending confidential information on the e-mail system as compared to written memoranda, letters or phone calls, because of the ease with which such information may be retransmitted. 5.4.3. Confidential information should not be sent or forwarded to individuals or entities not authorized to receive that information and should not be sent or forwarded to other District employees not directly involved with the specific matter. 5.4.4. Care should be taken in using e-mail to ensure messages are not inadvertently sent to the wrong individual. In particular,exercise care Page 6 of 10 when using distribution lists to make sure all addressees are appropriate recipients of the information. Lists are not always current and individuals using lists should take measures to ensure lists are current. 5.4.5. Employees shall not discuss confidential information outside of the workplace. 5.4.6. Confidential information should not be reproduced unnecessarily. 5.4.7. Employees shall return all tangible forms of confidential information to the District upon termination of employment or at the District's request. 5.5. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 5.5.1. It is the Orange County Sanitation District's policy to retain all copyrights and other intellectual property rights of which it is the legal owner. All copyrights and other intellectual property rights,which are created by District employees in the course and scope of their employment by the Orange County Sanitation District, are the exclusive property of the Orange County Sanitation District. 5.5.1.1. TRANSFER OF INFORMATION • District employees shall not post material on Internet or Intranet services or send material via e-mail,which is copyrighted by a party other than the District. • District employees shall not download copyrighted materials from these services except where permitted for research UM 5.6. COMPUTER SOFTWARE 5.6.1. VALID SOFTWARE REGISTRATION OR LICENSING 5.6.1.1. Each piece of proprietary software operating on a District computer must have valid registration(individually for stand- alone personal computers)or must be covered by users'license (if connected to a local area network). Proprietary software and associated documentation are subject to copyright laws and licensing agreements, and are not to be reproduced unless authorized under a licensing agreement. Appropriate documentation to substantiate the legitimacy of the software is necessary. Employees shall not use unauthorized software on District computer resources. • Personal Software-Installation and use of privately- owned software, including screen savers and shareware, on District computers is prohibited. • Entertainment Software-The use of entertainment software in District offices is prohibited at all times,except for training purposes,when It is authorized by the appropriate authority. Page 7 of 10 5.7. PASSWORDS 5.7.1. A confidential password does not guarantee privacy, nor does deletion mean the District cannot retrieve past communications, nor does it suggest that computer resources are the property right of the employee. Passwords and codes will help secure information, but they do not ensure privacy and security. Passwords should be changed periodically to ensure security. Users should not share their passwords with anyone else.The Information Technology Department has specific standards on password security. 5.8. INTERNET ACCESS 5.8.1. Use of the Internet is becoming increasingly necessary for District employees to provide effective and efficient public services. The efficient utilization of the Internet for communications and research can improve the quality, productivity,and general cost-effectiveness of the District's work force. Internet capability and employee access is provided by the District on an"as needed"basis and is a revocable privilege. 5.8.2. Internet access and use of online services are business communication tools,which are made available to certain employees and other users in order to enhance efficiency and effectiveness in the performance of job duties and District-related business and are to be used in accordance with generally accepted business practices and current laws. Use of the Internet or online services should be predominantly for the purpose of District business activities or contain information essential to District employees for the accomplishment of business-related tasks,and/or communication directly related to District business,administration,or practices. 5.8.3. The District reserves the right to monitor individual Internet access and use of online services for any purpose including, but not limited to, review,audit,and disclosure of all matters transmitted over the District's computer system or placed in its network storage. 5.8.4. Downloaded information including e-mail attachments shall be checked for virus contamination. The Information Technology Department has information available on how to scan for viruses. 5.8.5. Downloading of large data images, video and graphics should be timed so as not to impact the performance of the District network. Very large files should be downloaded after normal working hours. 5.9. ACCEPTABLE USE OF THE INTERNET 5.9.1. Specifically acceptable uses of the Internet include: • Communication and information exchange that is directly related to the mission,objectives,and business activities of the Orange County Sanitation District. • Communication and exchange for professional development, to maintain currency of training or education, or to discuss issues related to the employee or other user's job-related activities. Page 8 of 10 v • Use for advisory, standards,research,analysis, and professional society activities related to the employee or other user's work tasks or job-related duties. • Announcement of new District procedures, policies, rules, services, programs,information,or activities. • Communication with professional associations,public agencies, universities, businesses,and/or individuals associated with the facilitation of District-related business, research, and/or continuing education. 5.10. UNACCEPTABLE USE OF THE INTERNET 5.10.1. Specifically unacceptable uses of the Internet include: • Downloading any program,software, or application from the Internet or online services without prior written approval from both a Department Director and the IT Director and without scanning such applications for viruses before they are run,stored,or accessed. • Downloading or distributing pirated software or data. • Deliberately propagating any virus or any other destructive programming. • Downloading entertainment software or games. • Uploading any software licensed to the Orange County Sanitation District or data owned or licensed by the Orange County Sanitation District without the prior written authorization from both a Department Director and the IT Director. • Releasing and/or disseminating any confidential District information. • Intentionally introducing the District's computer systems to, or experimenting with,malicious computer code, such as computer worms or viruses. • Transmitting any material or information on the Internet or through the use of online services in violation of applicable copyright laws or patents. • Using any Internet access or online services that are likely to result in the loss of any recipients'work or which could cause congestion on the District's electronic network or which could otherwise interfere or disrupt the District's local area network users, services, or equipment. Page 9 of 10 i I 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1. PENALTIES 7.1.1. An employee who violates this policy may be subject to formal disciplinary action up to and including termination from District employment. In addition,any employee found to have violated this policy may have his/her access to computer files, Internet,and e-mail limited or revoked. Unlawful use of the District's computer resources, including Internet and e-mail services, may result in referral for civil or criminal prosecution. 7.1.2. It is the responsibility of each employee to ensure that his/her conduct conforms to the requirements set forth in this policy. Employees who are unsure as to whether a contemplated activity or course of conduct constitutes a violation of this policy shall request clarification from the IT Director and/or Human Resources Director. 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1. Policy B30.00, Harassment Policy 8.2. Policy F40.00, Use of District Property Page 10 of 10 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.or Dir. 12/11/02 12/18/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number _ FAHR02-114 1 e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator. Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: RENEWAL OF CONTRACT FOR INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL AUDITING SERVICES WITH MORELAND &ASSOCIATES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 AND JUNE 30, 2004 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a change order to the purchase order contract to appoint Moreland & Associates as the District's independent auditors for fiscal year 2002-03 for an annual amount not to exceed $47,800, and not to exceed $49,700 for fiscal year 2003-04. SUMMARY Moreland &Associates has served as the District's auditors for the past eight years, five years subsequent to the original selection process and for the past three years under the current contract. Upon the completion of the first five year contract with Moreland & Associates, the FAHR Committee directed staff to solicit proposals for Professional Auditing Services (RFP) beginning with fiscal year 1999-00, with the option of auditing the following two years at staffs discretion and an additional two years thereafter at the Board's option. A total of ten firms were solicited, including Moreland & Associates as directed by the FAHR Committee. After the completion of the bid process, the Selection Committee determined that Moreland &Associates was the most qualified bidder and recommended that the FAHR Committee and Board approve the appointment of Moreland &Associates to provide financial auditing services over the next three year period. Staff has been satisfied with the quality and timeliness of the work performed by Moreland & Associates and is now recommending that the last two option years presented in the request for proposal be approved. Since Moreland & Associates last proposal was low bid per audit hour, staff does not believe any significant cost savings could be achieved by declining the renewal option and opening up the bid process. G ece,e AawN PepwlM12Ml 14(a)A0I PenM11 eM R- see �Mi Page 1 PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Moreland & Associates is proposing a maximum fee of$47,800 and $49,700, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2004, respectively. These amounts are four percent annual increases over the $49,000 fee paid for the current year's audit excluding the one time charge of$3,000 associated with the additional time spent on reporting changes as a result of the implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34. BUDGET IMPACT x This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The fees for the 2002-03 audit will be included in the Joint Operating Budget for 2003-04. ALTERNATIVES Decline the two-year option renewal for financial auditing services from Moreland & Associates and direct staff to solicit bids from other qualified certified public accounting firms on a new five-year financial auditing services contract. If this option is selected, staff is recommending that Moreland & Associates be excluded from the request for proposal process. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None MW 3A".dWW0mdeTAHPoFAHR MW2 AWnde FeiY WDlta AYEII geneWdl 11 ReH.ea MMI Page 2 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT November 12, 2002, 6:30 p.m. Committee Chair Pickier called to order the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System at 6:45 p.m. on November 12, 2002 in the OCWD Boardroom. Those in attendance were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Iry Pickier, Chairman Shirley McCracken Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr. Brian Brady,Alternate No. 2 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Jan Flory, Alternate No. 2 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Staff: Directors Paul Brown, Kellen Bum-Roy, Dick Corneille, Blake Anderson Denis Bilodeau Bruce Chalmers—Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Jim Herberg Jan Debay Abdul Rashid!, David Mosher, Lynn Raschke, Sonja Wassgren Jerry King Geoff Carthew-Montgomery Watson Harza Wendy Sevenandt Dan Griset,Thom Coughran—City of Santa Ana Counsel: Staff: Kelly Rowe—AWRASCS Brad Hogin Virginia Grebbien Noble Waite—OCWD Retiree Tiffany Butler Lee Cory—Yorba Linda Water District Joanne Daugherty Debra Burris—DDB Engineering ShivajiDeshmukh RonLinsky-NWRI Bill Dunivin Bob Finn, Steve Line—Brown& Caldwell Bill Everest Dick Sudak, Kevin Alexander-SPI Jill Everhart Fred Bockmiller—Mesa Consolidated Water District Jenny Glasser Scott Foster—Flow Science Valves Roy Hemdon Tom& Nancy Lutz—Past OCWD Director John Kennedy John&Dorothy Fonley—Past OCWD Director Clark Ida Michelle Tuchman, Brenda Deeley,Annette Larry Labrado McCluskey— NCG Porter Novell! Mike Markus Bill Mills -Past OCWD General Manager Rafael Mujeriego Paul Cook, Russell Bauer, Russell Paris, Jeff Davis, Mehul Patel Dale Brown,Amin David, Irene David, Rachel Lily Pham Brady, Rick Shintaken, Bill Shane, Suzanne Choi, Don Phipps Dick Ackerman, Randy Furhman, Cathy Furhman, Tim Sovich Irwin Haydock,Zack Barrett Laura Thomas Mike Wehner Ron Wlldermuth Jean Worden - 1 - GWR System Joint Cooperative Committee Minutes i November 12, 2002 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Chairman Pickier welcomed everyone to the signing ceremony and reception to commemorate the Joint Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project. He reported on the history of the project and introduced present and past members of the Joint Cooperative Committee and former OCW D board members. Other speakers were Vice-Chair Eckenrode, OCSD President McCracken, and OCWD President King. Director Pickier invited the Committee and audience to sign the commemorative proclamations for the Groundwater Replenishment System. PUBLIC COMMENTS—No comments ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, December 9 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. - 2 - ) I BOARD OF DIRECTORS neMftDat2 T°BCLaf0i w18/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Rem NUMW 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: GRANT OF EASEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to execute a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company at no cost to build and maintain an electrical substation and transmission line near the intersection of Garfield Streed/Ward Avenue, in the City of Fountain Valley, in connection with the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY This easement is necessary for Southern California Edison Company (SCE)to supply electrical power to the Orange County Water District (OCWD)through a new proposed electrical substation to be built by SCE. The new substation will provide a reliable source of power to OCWD facilities, including the new Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System. However, the land for these facilities is owned by Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and leased to OCWD in accordance with the new Joint Agreement between the agencies. Therefore OCSD, being the land owner in fee, must grant an easement to SCE. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed Grant of Easement is at no cost to SCE. All costs for the construction of the substation are to be ongoing, shared equally between OCSD and OCWD as provided in the GWR System Agreement. The design and construction of the facility by SCE was approved at the October 25, 2002, Board of Directors meeting. All power costs will be bome by OCWD. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) No budget allocation is being requested at this time. w wim Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In October 2001, the Boards of Directors approved an agreement between OCWD and SCE, to design, build, and maintain a dual-feed 66/12kV substation in connection with the GWR System at a total cost of$2,396,000. The location of this substation and transmission line was approved by Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and Orange County Water District (OCWD)within the area that will be leased to OCWD by OCSD for the new Groundwater Replenishment(GWR) System facilities. The terms of the lease is detailed in the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the GWR System and Green Acres Project approved by the Board in October 2002. The proposed new easement to Southern California Edison Company (SCE) is required prior to SCE building their new electrical substation. SCE will not proceed without this easement from OCSD. The size of the easement will accommodate the SCE substation, as well as provide enough room for SCE to operate and maintain their substation. General Counsel has reviewed the easement and made special notes in an attached letter dated October 31, 2002. General Counsel is has recommended execution of the easement as SCE is the only energy company that can construct these facilities. ALTERNATIVES SCE is the only company that can install, own and maintain the substation. Having SCE provide the substation does not lock the OCWD into buying power from SCE. OCWD will contact various energy service providers to negotiate a power supply contract. CEQA FINDINGS The GWR System Final Environmental Impact Report was certified on March 24, 1999. Addenda No. 1 (March 28, 2001) and Addenda No. 2 (January 23,2002) have been approved by the OCSD and OCWD Boards of Directors. ATTACHMENTS 1. Legal description and map of proposed easement 2. Letter dated October 31, 2002 from Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart DAL:BC:sa G:tnlglobarAgenda Draft ReportWoint Swrds\AR Gmnl of Easement 121802.doc n W: WIMS Page 2 ' RECORDING REQUESTED BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 0 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 14799 CHESTNUT STREET WESTMINSTER CA 92683-5240 ATM: TITLE&REAL ESTATE SERVICES SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT OF EASEMENT DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX S SER 6557ZA J.O.Mn LDeatiorr Fountain Valley COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED A.P.N.: 156-101-06 OROOMPUTEDONFULLVALUELESSUENSAND ApP� ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING ATTMEOFSALE Cory .te Reel Esleta RP.FILE: MO50261188 50 CALIF EDISONCO Division SIGNATURE OF pECLARANT OR AGENT OEfERMINING TAX FIRM NAME BY JG DATE lln102 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public corporation, hereinafter called "Grantor', does hereby grant to SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a corporation, its successors and assigns, hereinafter called "Grantee", an easement to construct, use, maintain, alter, add to. repair, replace, inspect and/or remove buildings, structures, poles. towers, transformers, fences, concrete pads and other fixtures, appliances and property which said Grantee. its successors and assigns, may find necessary or convenient for the maintenance and operation of an electrical substation, in, under, on, along and across that certain real property of the Grantor situated in the County of Orange. State of California. described as follows: The North 20 acres of the South 40 acres of the West 80 acres of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 5 South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of Orange, State of California, excepting the East 10 acres. Substation Site: Said Substation Site is more particularly shown as Parcel 2 on the Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Grantor also hereby grants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement to construct and use, at any time and from time to time, electrical and communication systems consisting of wood and/or metal poles, guy wires, anchors, crossarms, conduits, vaults, pullboxes, wires and other appurtenances, both overhead and underground, for conveying electrical energy to be used for light, heat, power and for transmitting intelligence by electrical means and other purposes, together with an easement and right of way for ingress and egress in connection with the maintenance and operation of the aforesaid electrical and communication systems and said substation, in. under, on, over, along and across that certain real property in said County and State. described as follows: Transmission Line Right of Way: Said Transmission Line Right of Way is more particularly shown as Parcel 1 on the Exhibit -A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof Grantor also hereby grants to Grantee. its successors and assigns. the right to use existing roads on lands of Grantor as shall be necessary or convenient to Grantee's access to and use of said electrical substation site, electrical and communication systems. and guy wires and anchors. and the right to use all necessary and convenient means of ingress to and egress from said electrical substation, electrical and communication systems, and guy wires and anchors, from the public Grant of Easement Orange County Sanitation District a public corporation to S.C,E.Co., a corp. Serial No. 65572A RP File: MOS0261188 highway most convenient thereto, for the uses and purposes and the exercising of the rights herein granted. Grantor also hereby grants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, the right to clear and to keep clear said electrical substation site. electrical and communication systems right of way, guy wires and anchors. access road, and rights of way for ingress and egress, free from explosives. buildings, equipment, brush, combustible material and any and all other structures and obstructions of any kind, and the right to trim or remove any tree or shrub which, in the opinion of the Grantee, may endanger said electrical substation, electrical and communication systems, guy wires and anchors. access road and ingress or egress, or any part thereof, or Interfere with the exercise of the rights herein granted. This Grant of Easement is trade for the sole object and purpose of constructing and maintaining a substation and transmission line in, under, on, along. over and across the areas depicted on the said Exhibit W. IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, this instrument has been executed this _ day of , 20_ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public corporation sy Name Its STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On before me, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose names) are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that (she/he/they) executed the same in (her/his/their) authorized capacitylies) and that by (her/his/their) signature(s) on the Instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature .2- A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 10 HEST, SMAL COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF o CAUFORNIA —Ellis AVE.- . FOUND 3 1/2' O.C.S. BCM IN HANDWELL, PER R.S. 91/41 I m m E N a5 N`9.08'43' E I 25 '� LLL�LL m LLLLL O1 m I b� PARCEL No. 2 � N O L � L_ L- L_ � $ _ LLLLo S � �o I e -,OLLLL'$o p a I NIPARCEL No. 1 LLLC m s= I %8 04 583• E ' i L L L LAND SroO N� LLLLL s b I S 89.06'43' N— 9 m o I 85.00' * E lb I z S o: l'ff s OFCALW a I 25' e I m ml I FOUND 1' I.P. W/O.C.S. TAG, ACCEPTED DI LIEU OF NAIL IN 2' X 2' PER R.S. 91/41 -GARFIELD - —AVE.— O LANDS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PARCEL No. 1, 50' WIDE TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT TO O 20 40 80 ® SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SCALE IN FEET Are, = 3979 SgFL = 0.0914 Aeres® y7{���tr�PARCEL No. 2, SUBSTATION EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN C�f[3 I �Ap CALFORNG EDISON COMPANY Area 747 5 Ft O.I7IS Acres PROJECT NAME: KIWI SUBSTATION A.S. 42-90 MAP K F.B. REF: 10491/34-36 CITY: FOUNTAIN VA XEY DRAWN BY: LKELLEY ISURVEYED BY: HUBBARO COUNTY:ORANGE DATE: 8-6-02 LAND INFO.: J.GLASSER SER : 55572A J.0.:2972 LES:4955 ® ��)ISON CHECKED BY: L.KELLEY File Name: M:\ARCHUE\DRAWIN( \ 4955 .DWG LAC OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET.SUITE 8000•ORANGE.CA 928684760 •(714)558-7000 •FAx(714)835-7787 (DIRECT DIAL[(714)9W-2604 [DIRECT F" (714)WS-2504 [EWAiLI JSR@WSS WcC October 31, 2002 VIA FACSIMILE (714) 378-3381 AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Ms. WendyT. Sevenandt Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Re: Southern California Edison Substation and Transmission Line Easement Dear Ms. Sevenandt: Enclosed for your review is a copy of the final Grant of Easement between the District and SCE. As you can see, the Agreement is virtually identical to the original easement grant. SCE refused to accept any our proposed substantive changes, except the "sole purpose" language contained in the last paragraph. SCE would not accept clauses requiring 1) prior written approval of the District prior to SCE performing work in the easement; 2) that SCE operate and maintain, in good repair, improvements within the easement area at no cost to the District; 3) express limitations on what could be placed in the easement; and 4) indemnification. While our suggested revisions would provide additional protection for the District, the District's options for negotiating with an alternative power company are limited. It is my understanding, based on our conversation, that SCE is the only energy company that can construct these sub-stations. Thus, the District has little, if any, leverage. Nonetheless and despite the absence of several of the provisions discussed above, the District should be aware that the law generally requires that the owner of the easement, in this case, SCE, keep the easement in good repair. Moreover, under California law, even without an express indemnity clause, there is a common law indemnity right. See Far West Financial Corp. v. D&S Co. 46 Cal.3d 796 (1988). TERRY C.ANDRUS•SIEPHEN 1.SEATON•M,MIS BOBAK R CAROLWEA.BYRNE•IOHN E CAVANAUGH•GARY W.CROCKLIT TAMI£CROSBY•M LT.OAWLEY•JAMES M.DOMCH R CRAIG G.FARRINGTON•JOSeH W.FORBATH•MCHARD W.HELMS BRADLEY K HOGM•DOVOLASC.FWLLA,ND•LOIS E IEFFREY•ROBERTA A K AUS•MAGDALENA LONAAVIANF•IUUE MCCLOSKEY THOMAS F ND(ON•BARBARA RAILEANU•JASON S.REITEROR R OMAR SANDOVAL•JOHN K SHAW NGREGORY E SNONIAN K ARD R.SMART.JR.DAMEL K SPRAD 0LAURA A.UNDERWOOD•THOMAS L WOODRUFF Ms. WendyT. Sevenandt October 31, 2002 Page 2 Please call me if you have any questions regarding the grant of easement. Otherwise, please have the easement signed, notarized, and return to Ms. Valco with a carbon copy to our office. Sincerely WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A Professional Corporation 6,-JI_CONI§ V&TERER JSR/pem Enclosure nsmw BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mewing Date Tced.or .Dir. t2/te/o2 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, JOB NO. J-40-5 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Consideration of the following actions regarding environmental documentation required to modify the certified 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report: a. Receive and file Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, and Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program, dated November 2002, prepared by Environmental Science Associates; and, b. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-23, Making Certain Findings Relating to Significant Environmental Effects identified in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for implementation of the Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77 and Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program; Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Supplementing the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR; Certifying the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77 and Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program ("Project'); and Authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination re said Project. SUMMARY • Since certification of the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR), a number of treatment and collection system projects have undergone additional engineering assessment which warrant minor modifications and/or additions that were not previously discussed or identified in the certified Final Program EIR. • The Effluent Pump Station Annex (EPSA), Job No. J-77 and the Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program (OCP)were not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR. Environmental Science Associates (ESA) has prepared a Supplemental EIR (SEIR)to the Final Program EIR in accordance with CEQA guidelines. Page 1 t r • The SEIR was circulated for Public review and a Public Meeting was held to solicit comments. Responses to comments have been prepared and are included in the Final SEIR, mailed to the Board of Directors on December 6, 2002. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No budgetary action is being requested at this time. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Miscellaneous& Support Projects, Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR Section 8-Page 162) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No budgetary action is being requested at this time. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • Effluent Pump Station Annex (EPSA), Job No. J-77: The Supplement has been prepared to address minor modifications to the Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR)for construction of a new pump station instead of rehabilitating the existing Foster Pump Station (FPS) at Orange County Sanitation Districts (District) Treatment Plant No. 2. Historically, the FPS has been used as a backup system to the Ocean Ouffall Booster Station (OOBS)during emergency peak flow events and/or when OOBS is temporarily out of service or down for maintenance. However, a recent engineering study concluded that the existing FPS would require more extensive rehabilitation than previously anticipated. The FPS is incapable of pumping concurrently with the existing COBS during a peak flow emergency event. Moreover, the rehabilitation efforts would involve extensive seismic upgrades to meet current code requirements. Based on this study, it was determined to be more cost effective to decommission and remove the existing FPS and construct The Effluent Pump Station Annex (EPSA), as the new backup pump station to OOBS. EPSA will operate interchangeably and in conjunction with OOBS to accommodate future flows. The project will consist of three different buildings; a 40-ft tall pump building, a 30-ft tall distribution center, and a 26-ft tall standby power facility. In addition, some existing piping will be modified and/or new piping installed. The existing Santa Ana River (SAR)emergency manual overflow weirs will be demolished and replaced with five adjustable weirs. The installation of one junction box near the eastern edge of the plant site will require minimal excavation into the SAR levee. • Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program: In an effort to provide a more effective odor and corrosion control program for the collection system, a Supplement to alter the existing PEIR has been prepared. By adding the Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program (OCP), new chemicals and application methods will be implemented throughout the Districts service area. Traditionally, the District has used the caustic soda slug dosing treatment application, where chemicals Page 2 are discharged into the sewers through manholes in the street. The application sites vary throughout the collection system depending on the need, but 15 or 20 manhole locations were commonly used. However, in 2000, a pilot study was initiated to evaluate altemative treatment technologies for controlling hydrogen sulfide odors and corrosion. Several different chemicals and applications methods were assessed, but three were selected based on their noncorrosive reaction to the sewer system if used continuously for long periods of time. The chemicals are ferric chloride, hydrogen peroxide, and magnesium hydroxide. Currently, there are twenty chemical application sites under the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)existing operation; twelve sites are being treated intermittently with the caustic soda slug dosing application method, and eight are using continuous feed systems, these sites will be kept in operation and made permanent features of the District's odor control program. The location of future continuous feed sites will be based on the results of the continued monitoring and evaluation of the program's performance. Portions of the Euclid Relief, Newhope-Placentia, Magnolia-Bushard, and the Coast Highway trunk lines are currently being considered for continuous feed sites. As the Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program (OCP) is implemented, other locations may be added anywhere within the service area depending on the need for odor control. The District will continue to use the slug dosing method at the various sites where installation of a continuous chemical feed facility is not feasible or project constraints. Constraints may be due to land availability, location sites within sensitive receptor areas, (i.e. schools, residential areas, health care facilities), aesthetic concerns or where zoning restrictions forbid chemical storage. None of these chemicals are toxic or pose an air quality hazard to public health 9 accidentally spilled. Ferric chloride is used routinely at the treatment plants. Hydrogen peroxide is an oxidizer that naturally converts to water. Magnesium hydroxide is essentially "Milk of Magnesia". However, the District will coordinate future sites with each city and/or fire department. A Notice of Preparation (NOP)was circulated for a 30-day public review period; June 3 through July 3, 2002. A total of 19 NOP comment letters were received. These comments were addressed in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Report (SEIR) that was circulated for a 45-day public review period, from July 23, 2002 through September 6, 2002. An informational public workshop was held on September 4, at the District's administrative offices to comment on the Draft SEIR. Following the comment period, District staff prepared a Response to Comments document, which together with the Draft SEIR constitutes the Final SEIR. The Final SEIR was circulated on November 6, to all that made written and/or oral comments on the Draft SEIR or at the workshop. The Final SEIR was circulated for a 10-day public review period, from November 6 through November 17, 2002. A public notice of the Final SEIR was filed with the County of Orange on November 6, 2002 and published in the Orange County Register on November 13 and 14, 2002. As of this writing, four comment letters have been received, from the cities of Anaheim, Tustin, Huntington Beach, and Fullerton. However, the comments do not raise new issues or significant impacts. If any additional comments are received,they will be reported at the District's December 18 Board meeting. �: yam Page 3 • CEQA states that the SEIR be circulated to the public ten days prior to certification of the Final SEIR. The Board of Directors received the Draft and Final SEIR, by separate letters mailed on August 22 and December 6, respectively. If a Director needs an additional copy of either the Draft or Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), please contact Jim Herberg, 714-593-7310. ALTERNATIVES Under the No Project Alternative, the District would proceed with upgrading the Foster Pump Station (FPS)and the existing Collection System Odor Control Program, as identified in the PEIR. Under this ARemative, the District would be susceptible to additional collection system odor and sewer corrosion problems and the FPS would not provide the effective effluent pumping reliability necessary during peak flow events. CEQA FINDINGS The 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program EIR was certified by the District Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. The SEIR for EPSA and the OCP will be filed and retained in the District's official files. ATTACHMENT 1. Resolution No. OCSD-02-23 2. Attachment A, Findings of Fact 3. Attachment B, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AA: G:WgVmr0,genda Draft Repo UWnl eoerdsElR J40-5 AR for EPSA CCP.do e: ° 1 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-23 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX, JOB NO. J-77 AND COLLECTION SYSTEM ODOR AND CORROSION CONTROL PROGRAM; ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTING THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN EIR; CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX, JOB NO. J-77 AND COLLECTION SYSTEM ODOR AND CORROSION CONTROL PROGRAM ("PROJECT'); AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX, JOB NO. J-77 AND COLLECTION SYSTEM ODOR AND CORROSION CONTROL PROGRAM; ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTING THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN EIR; CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX, JOB NO. J-77 AND COLLECTION SYSTEM ODOR AND CORROSION CONTROL PROGRAM ("PROJECT'); AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ('District"), hereinafter referred to as 'Board", is presently considering the approval of the Effluent Pump Station Annex ("EPSA") and Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program ("OCP"); and, WHEREAS, on October 27, 1999, the Board adopted a Final Program EIR for the Strategic Plan ("PEIR"), which identified projects and programs needed to accommodate the projected population growth in its service area through 2020; and, WHEREAS, the PER identified (1) the need to upgrade the Foster Pump Station ("FPS"), which acts as a back-up pump to the ocean discharge outfall, and (2) the existing odor system control program, which consists of intermittent application of caustic soda at various locations in the collection system; and, WHEREAS, the District proposes to modify the program evaluated in the PER by (1) constructing a new back-up pump station, the EPSA, to replace the i FPS, and (2) the continued operation and future installation of continuous chemical feed systems at various locations along the collection system; and, WHEREAS, the District is the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Effluent Pump Station Annex and Collection System Odor and Corrosion Control Program , pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, ("CEQA"), the State of California CEQA Guidelines and District CEQA procedures; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines § 15163, District staff determined that a supplement to the PEIR (SEIR) was required because only minor additions or changes were necessary to make the PEIR adequately apply to the EPSA and OCP; and, WHEREAS, District staff consulted with other public agencies and the general public, and gave them several opportunities to comment on the Draft SEIR as required by CEQA; and, WHEREAS, on September 4, 2002, the District staff held a duly-noticed public workshop to provide a further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the Draft SEIR; and, WHEREAS, the Board has objectively evaluated the comments from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft SEIR; and, WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft SEIR, either in full or in summary, together with the District staffs responses to significant environmental concerns raised in the review and consultation process, have been included in the Final SEIR; and, WHEREAS, District staff presented to the Board the PEIR and the Final SEIR consisting of the Draft SEIR, list of comments on the Draft SEIR, and responses to the comments received on the Draft SEIR for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and commitment to, the two projects. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: 1. That the Board of Directors hereby certifies that the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines and that the Board of Directors has reviewed and considered the information contained in the PEIR as revised by the FSEIR prior to approval of, or commitment to, the two projects, and that the FSEIR, consisting of the Draft SEIR and the Response to Comments, reflects the District's independent judgment and analysis; and, 2. The Board finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of the project and adopts the Findings of Fact as described in Attachment A; and, 3. The District will implement the mitigation measures recommended in the PEIR and the mitigation measures recommended in the FSEIR to reduce the significant impacts of the project to a less than significant level. 4. The Board adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as described in Attachment B to ensure that all mitigation measures are implemented; and, 4. The Board authorizes and directs the Board Secretary to file the Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the District's CEQA procedures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 18, 2002. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary ATTACHMENT A - FINDINGS OF FACT EU/961MM ATTACHMENT A-FINDINGS OF FACT I. FINAL SEIR FOR THE PROJECT The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report(SEIR)consists of one volume including the revised Draft SEIR,comments letters received on the Draft SEIR,and responses to those comments. II. THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD CONTENTS OF THE RECORD The following information is incorporated by reference and made part of the record supporting these findings and the actions taken by the District in certifying the Final SEIR and approving the Project I. The Final Supplemental EIR and all documents relied upon or incorporated by reference in the Final Supplemental EIR. 2. The Final Program EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan and all documents relied upon or incorporated by reference in the Final Program EIR, including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan. 3. All testimony,documentary evidence and all correspondence submitted to or delivered to the District in connection with the meetings and public hearings at which the Draft SEIR or Final SEIR was considered by the District. 4. All testimony,documentary evidence and all correspondence submitted to or delivered to any of the District's member districts in connection with the meetings,workshops and public hearings at which the Dmft SEIR or Final SEIR was considered by the District's member districts. 5. All staff reports,memoranda,maps,slides,letters, minutes of meetings and other documents relied upon or prepared by District staff and consultants relating to the project. 6. Any other documents specified by Public Resources Code section 21167.6(e). LOCATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD The District is the custodian of the administrative record, including all CEQA documents and the other background documents and materials,which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the District's Board decisions to certify the Final SEIR and approve the projects are based. The administrative record is located at the District's administrative offices at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,California,92708. HI. PURPOSE OF FINDINGS In accordance with CEQA,the Board is required to make a finding under 14 Cal.Code Regs §15091 for each significant effect shown in the previous EIR as revised by the Final SEIR. 14 F /9 36 1 ATFACHMFM A-FUMNGS OF FACT Cal.Code Regs§15163. The purpose of these findings is to supplement the previous Board's findings when they adopted the Strategic Plan PEIR. The previous Board findings,which are provided in Resolution No.OCSD 99-19,are incorporated by reference herein. The Final SEIR,prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), evaluates the significant adverse environmental impacts that could result from the project. Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the public agency approving or carrying out the project shall make written findings for each significant impact identified in the SEIR. These findings include one of the following: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as defined in the EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 3. Specific economic, legal,social,technological,or other considerations,including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers,make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. These findings accomplish the following: 1. They address the significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR for the approved project. 2. They incorporate all mitigation measures associated with these significant impacts identified in either the Draft SEIR or Final SEIR—Response to Comments. 3. They indicate whether a significant effect is avoided or reduced by the adopted mitigation measures to a less than significant level,or remain significant and unavoidable,either because there are no feasible mitigation measures or because,even with implementation of mitigation measures,a significant impact will occur. The conclusions presented in these findings are based on the PEIR,the Final SEIR and other evidence in the record of proceedings. The Final SEIR identifies no impacts that remain significant and unavoidable consequences of the project. IV. EFFECT OF FINDINGS To the extent that these findings conclude that various proposed mitigation measures outlined in the Program EIR as modified by the Final SEIR are feasible and have not been modified, superseded,or withdrawn,the District hereby binds itself to implement these measures. These findings,in other words,are not merely information. The mitigation measures identified as feasible and within the District's authority to implement for the approved project are express conditions of approval which the District binds itself to upon adoption of this resolution and project approval. Other requirements are referenced in the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program("MMRP")adopted concurrently with these findings,becoming effective through EU 19 36 2 AITACHMEW A-FINDINGS OF FACT project implementation. The MMRP developed for the SEIR does not supersede the MMRP developed for the Program EIR,but rather provides additional measures applicable to the newly proposed projects. In other words,the projects assessed in the SEIR must be consistent with the MMRP for the Program EIR in addition to the newly developed MMRP. V. FINDINGS CONCERNING THE PROJECTS EFFL UENT PUMP STA TION ANNEX The District proposes construction of a new backup pump station,the Effluent Pump Station Annex EPSA,to replace the Foster Pump Station(FPS). The proposed EPSA will consist of three different buildings(a pump station,distribution building,and standby power facility), associated piping and replacement of the existing Santa Ana River emergency overflow weirs. Two existing buildings will be demolished to make room for the new buildings and several conduits andjunction boxes will also be demolished or modified. Approximately 40,000 to 50,000 cubic yards(cy)of soil will be excavated during construction and approximately 10,000 to 20,000 cy of soil will be needed for fill. Therefore,the net volume of soil to be removed will be about 30,000 cy,which will require approximately 1,500 round-trip truck trips to remove from the site. In addition,approximately 1.5 acres of existing property will be graded and designed to generally match existing grades. Construction activity will take up to 33 months from early 2003 through 2005,with approximately 750 days(2 years)of actual construction work. The FPS will remain in-service until the middle of construction of the EPSA,at which time the FPS will be demolished and removed from the Plant No. 2 site. The on-site wnstruction workforce will likely average about 35 to 45 workers per day over the worse of the project. During peak construction activity,this number will range from approximately 100 to 150 workers. ODOR AND CORROSION CONTROL PROGRAM In an effort to provide a more effective odor control program for the collection system and reduce corrosion from caustic soda,the District is proposing to implement a new Odor and Corrosion Control Program(OCP) involving chemicals and application methods recommended in the pilot study. The chemicals would be stored in above-ground storage tanks installed in local utility yards. Eight continuous feed systems were recommended in various locations throughout the collection system,with more possible locations to be identified in the future depending on the need for odor control. Locations of the future storage tanks have not been determined,but Gould be located near sensitive land uses such as residential areas,schools,and care facilities. The tanks would not be located in areas where zoning restrictions forbid chemical storage. Installation of the continuous feed systems is a relatively minor operation involving the installation of temporary polyethylene tanks with PVC pipes running from the tank to the pumps and injection points. These aboveground tanks have a storage capacity of roughly 4,000 gallons and range in size from 8 to 12 feet in diameter and 8 to 16 feet in height. The tanks would be ESAI9 36 3 - ArrACHMFNr A-FMIHGS OF FACE refilled approximately I to 3 times per week. Installation of the feed system and storage tanks takes one to two weeks and may involve minor excavation,trenching,and potentially temporary lane closures. The OCP system's overall annual chemical usage would be approximately 1,500,000 gallons of ferric chloride,500,000 gallons of hydrogen peroxide,440,000 gallons of magnesium hydroxide,and 550,000 gallons of nitrates. None of these chemicals are toxic or pose an air quality hazard to public health if accidentally spilled. VI. FINDINGS CONCERNING SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS The Final SEIR indicates that the project would not result in any significant unavoidable impact to the environment. VH. FINDINGS CONCERNING SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS BY MITIGATION MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT The Final SEIR identifies significant impacts that are reduced to a"less than significant"level by the inclusion in the project approval of the mitigation measures identified in the Final SEIR. Changes or alternations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the Final SEIR to a less than significant level. These changes and alterations are presented in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting program,which the Board is adopting concurrently with these findings. AESTHETICS As described in Section 3.2 of the Final SEIR,the new EPSA pump station building would be visible from adjacent residential neighborhoods and PCH. In addition,the tanks for the odor control program could be visible from adjacent land uses. These impacts,however, will be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level based on the following: a. The Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.2-1 which requires the contractor to replace damaged landscaping and restore the construction area near the property boundary to a condition similar to existing conditions. This will insure that there will be an equally effective landscape buffer between the new EPSA building and nearby residential neighborhoods and Pacific Coast Highway. This mitigation measure will further insure that the existing aesthetic quality and degree of visibility of the EPSA site is maintained post-construction. b. The Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.2-2 which provides that when siting future chemical feed systems,the District will prioritize industrial sites,such as storage yards,which are generally not adjacent to sensitive land uses. If an industrial site is not available,the District will attempt to place the chemical storage tanks out of public ESAr%Oi]6 4 ATFACNME"A-FINDINGS OF FAR view. The District will shield the tanks from public view using fencing or by other means as appropriate to match the existing character of the surrounding area. This measure will insure that future tank locations are visually compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. C. Although mitigation measure M-3.2-1 and M-3.2-2 reduce any significant aesthetic impacts to a level of insignificance,the Final SEIR also recommended mitigation measure M-3.2-3,which requires the District to coordinate with the various affected cities prior to installing new chemical storage tanks in the service area. This measure will provide an additional safeguard and allow each affected city input on the location of the continuous feed systems within their communities. This will further insure that aesthetic impacts would be further reduced to a level of insignificance. GEOLOGY AND SOILS As described in Section 3.3 of the Final SEIR,the proposed EPSA and OCP project could expose people or structures to potential adverse effects due to rupture of a known earthquake fault,strong ground shaking,ground failure, including liquefaction and landslides due to seismic activity. The Final SEIR also concluded that the proposed EPSA project could be located on expansive soil,creating risks to proposed structures. These impacts,however,will be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level based on the following: a. To mitigate potential seismic impacts,the SEIR provides stringent requirements that apply to the construction of new facilities. The Final SEIR states that"any new structures under the proposed project would be required to meet updated California Building Codes standard specific for the underlying geologic materials in order to insure the safety of the structures and its occupant. (See page 3.3-8). The SEIR also identifies specific mitigation measures from the 1999 PEIR to mitigate impacts,specifically mitigation measure 6.6-IA and 6.6-IB. These mitigation measures provide that the District will design and construct new facilities in accordance with District seismic standards and/or meet or exceed seismic design standards in the most recent edition of the California Building code. Mitigation measure 6.6-1A identifies the"performance standard"as"minimization of the hazards"and lists the following measures to achieve minimization of liquefaction hazards: • De-densification or de-watering of surface or sub-surface soils • Construction of pile or pier foundations to support pipelines and/or buildings FSA/96p1]6 5 ATTACHMENT A-FINDINGS OF FACT • Removal of material that could undergo liquefaction in the event of an earthquake and replacement with stable material b. To reduce potential geologic hazards relating to the OCP,the Final SEIR identifies M-3.3-1,which provides that chemical storage tanks and appurtenant piping and connections will be designed to withstand ground shaking to avoid potential spills during a seismic event. This measure insures that structural seismic standards will be incorporated into the design of future tank facilities. C. To reduce the potential hazards from expansive soils,the Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure 6.6-IE from the program EIR. As discussed in subsection(a),this mitigation measure identifies a specific performance standard and provides various measures to minimize risks associated with expansive soils and liquefaction. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS The Final SEIR analyzes impacts relating to hazards and hazardous materials in Section 3.4. As discussed in this section,the proposed EPSA and OCP project would include the transport, storage,and use of diesel fuel and odor reduction chemicals that could pose a spill or leak hazard. The Final SEIR further provides that OCP chemical storage site construction could impair or interfere with emergency response routes due to the temporary lane closures. These impacts, however,will be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level based on the following: a. To reduce potential impacts resulting from a potential spill or leak,the Final SEIR identifies 2 mitigation measures. Mitigation measure M-3.4-I provides that storage and use of hazardous materials at the Treatment Plant and OCP sites throughout the service area will comply with state and federal regulations and storage and dispensing permits will be obtained as necessary. In addition,the District will follow procedures relating to the proper handling and storage of hazardous materials at the OCP sites as required by mitigation measure M-3.4-2. These procedures require the District to(1) obtain a permit to store hazardous materials from the local fire department;(2)provide notification to the Orange County health care agency of each storage site location and caustic soda application site;(3)equip chemical delivery trucks with spill equipment adequate to contain and clean up any solid or liquid spill;(4)provide chemical storage tanks with adequate secondary containment;and(5)modify the District's Spill Prevention Containment and Counter Measure Plan to include the OCP chemical storage sites. As provided for in mitigation measure M-3.4-3,the District shall require that all personnel working with such chemicals have health and safety training per OSHA requirements. Mitigation measure M-3A-4 requires controlled access at the OCP chemical storage sites to prevent trespassing and unauthorized encounters with chemical ESAIffi 36 6 ATTACHMENT A-FINDINGS OF FACT ' substances. Combined,these measures insure that any risks associated with the use of hazardous materials are reduced to a level of insignificance. b. To reduce the risk of exposure to hazards and hazardous materials during construction,the Final SEIR identifies two mitigation measures. Mitigation measure M- 3.4-5 provides that any contaminated soils encountered on the project site during demolition,site clearance,or construction activities shall be removed from the project site and disposed of off-site in accordance with applicable hazardous waste regulations. Mitigation measure M-3.4-6 requires that all structures to be demolished must be investigated for the presence of lead paint and/or asbestos containing material and precautions must be taken to insure the safe removal and disposal of these materials. These measures will reduce the risk of exposure to construction personnel in areas immediately adjacent to the construction site. C. To reduce potential interference with emergency response routes to a level of insignificance,the Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.4-7 which requires the District to provide notice of construction and lane closures lasting more than one day to local emergency service providers within 72 hours prior to construction activities. District coordination with these emergency service provides would insure that alternative routes are available for emergency vehicles. HYDROLOGY The Final SEIR analyzes hydrology and water quality impacts in section 3.5. The Final SEIR concludes that the EPSA and OCP projects could violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements due to ground disturbance activity during construction. These impacts, however,will be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level based on the following: a. To reduce potential water quality impacts,the Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.5.1 which requires the District to prepare a storm water pollution prevention plan to identify best management practices to minimize water quality impacts resulting from EPSA construction activities. The District will also file a Notice of Intent for de-watering activities during construction to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and all de-watering activity would comply with the general NPDES permit (CAG998001)for de minimus discharges including construction de-watering. Mitigation measures for de-watering activities are also discussed in the PEIR in measure 6.7-2A and 6.7-2B which will further reduce water quality and hydrology impacts. b. To mitigate potential Flooding impacts at EPSA and OCP,the District shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Orange County Flood Control District prior to ESA 19 36 7 ArrACHMENr A-FM INGS OF FAR working within the Santa Ana River levee,as required by mitigation measure M-3.5-2. In addition,mitigation measure M-3.5-3 prohibits construction activity in the Santa Ana River channel. With respect to the OCP,mitigation measure M-3.5-4 provides that no chemical storage tanks shall be installed within the FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain. Therefore,the potential that these facilities will be impacted by future flood, is less than significant. NOISE The Final SEIR identified potential noise impacts during construction of the EPSA and during operation of both the EPSA and OCP. Construction activities that may generate noise include demolition,grading and earth moving activities,hauling materials,pile driving,and ultimate construction of the building structures. Construction noise levels would generally fluctuate depending on the type, number,and duration of construction equipment. Potential operational noise sources include testing of emergency generators and back-up pumps, and additional traffic trips at the EPSA. Regarding the OCP,operational noise sources include potential cock trips to fill the chemical storage tanks. These impacts,however,will be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level based on the following: a. To reduce potential operational noise impacts of the EPSA,the new facilities will be designed to insulate noise of the machinery,such that the fence line noise standards would not be exceeded. This will insure that any surrounding sensitive land uses would not be adversely impacted by the testing of emergency generators and back-up pumps. b. To reduce potential construction noise impacts at the EPSA,the Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.6-2 which requires the construction contractor to comply with the city of Huntington Beach and Orange County noise standards. In addition,mitigation measure M-3.6-3 provides that all equipment used during construction should be muffled and maintained in good operating condition. Moreover, all internal combustion engine driven equipment should be fitted with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition. These measures will reduce the noise levels during concoction activity to prevent disturbance of surrounding sensitive land uses. TRAFFIC The Final SEIR discusses potential traffic impacts in section 3.7. The Final SEIR concludes that during periods of peak construction,the EPSA and OCP project would add to traffic to local access streets during peak commute hours. During peak commute hours,EPSA construction traffic will temporarily impact the Orange County freeway system and local roadways,primarily rsA/9M36 8 ATTACHMENT A-FINDINGS OF FACT Brookhurst.However,as documented in the Final SEER,Brookhurst St.operates at LOS A under existing conditions and would not be adversely impacted. In addition,project construction traffic would not substantially reduce the level of service on 1-405,which conveys over 240,000 daily trips(over 14,000 of which are trucks)with a peak hour average over 19,000 trips at Brookhurst Street. Installation of the continuous feed systems and storage tanks takes one to three weeks and may involve excavation,trenching,and potentially lane closures. Chemical deliveries to storage tanks could require temporary lane closures one to three times per week. The construction activities would be short and chemical deliveries would be brief and are not expected to pose significant traffic impacts. These impacts,will be further avoided or reduced to a less than significant level based on the following: a. Despite the project's nominal or less than significant traffic contribution during the peak hours,the Final SEIR identified Mitigation Measure M-3.7-I which limits truck traffic to non-peak hours to the extent feasible.The project must also comply with mitigation measure 6.2-1 of the PEIR which requires the District to minimize peak hour construction traffic.The measure will reduce the volume of construction traffic accessing the freeway and local streets during the peak commute hours and would ensure that construction traffic impacts remain less than significant. b. Mitigation measure M-3.7-2 requires the District to provide construction worker parking on site for each phase of construction. This will prevent any spill-over perking effects on surrounding neighborhoods and local streets. Mitigation measure M-3.7-3 also requires that for any lane closure excavation within the CalTrans right of way, including Pacific Coast Highway,the District must comply with CalTrans encroachment permit application project. This last measure will insure that the project would not disrupt traffic flows on CalTmns rights of way. Caltram Websm accessed October 4,2002, harp://www.dot.m.gov/hq/tmffops/safemr/trafdam/2001alllr280405i.htm ESA/96 M 9 ATfACNMF A-MDMGS OF FACT VHI. FINDINGS CONCERNING IDENTIFIED IMPACTS THAT WERE DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITHOUT NEEDING TO IDENTIFY MITIGATION MEASURES The Final SEIR identifies impacts that are considered to be`Iess than significant"not requiring mitigation measures. It is hereby determined that these environmental impacts of the project will be less than significant. AIR QUALITY The Final SEIR analyzes potential air quality impacts in section 3.1. According to the Final SEIR,construction of the EPSA would emit criteria pollutants. However,the estimated daily average construction emissions would not exceed the significance thresholds set by the South Coast Air Quality Management District("SCAQMD"). Construction related emissions would primarily be: (1)dust generated from excavation grading,grading and soil removal;(2)exhaust emissions from powered construction equipment;and(3)motor vehicle emissions associated with construction activities. As shown on Table 3.14 of the Final SEIR,each distinct phase of construction activity would not exceed the SCAQMD significance criteria. Nonetheless,as an added precaution,the Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.1-1 which requires soil removal contractors to cover all rocks hauling soil,sand,and other loose materials,or maintain at least two feet of free board. The Final SEIR also concluded that the operation of the proposed EPSA and OCP project would emit criteria pollutants. However,similar to construction emissions,the estimated daily average emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds or otherwise violate air quality standards. Although stationary emissions would be generated by the occasional use of back-up diesel generators,no SCAQMD permits are required because the back-up generators would be used less than 200 hours per year. Therefore,these emissions are not considered significant. In addition,the two to three delivery cock trips per week that the OCP facilities would generate a negligible amount air emissions and would not be significant. Moreover,no additional mobile source emissions are anticipated because the project entails the replacement of the existing Foster Pump Station with the EPSA. The proposed OCP project is anticipated to reduce objectionable odors generated by the collection system. The OCP would reduce the odorous gases currently generated by the waste water collection system and is considered a beneficial impact of the project. HYDROLOGY The EPSA and OCP project could alter existing drainage pattems and result in erosion and flooding,especially during construction activities. The existing site,however, is fairly flat and little erosion or flooding is anticipated to occur. The EPSA, in fact,is located in an area where FSq/%atM 10 ATTACHMENT A-FINDINGS OF FACT ' storm water is collected and sent back through the treatment system. Implementation of BMPS during construction would minimize erosion and siltation impacts. Due to the minimal amount of excavation,the OCP would not require or result in any change in drainage patterns that could result in substantial erosion or flooding. Therefore,no mitigation is required for potential drainage and flooding impacts. NOISE Because the OCP requires only 3 trucks per week,additional trips would not raise the ambient noise in the area significantly and no mitigation is required. Although the proposed EPSA project could expose persons to, or generate,excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels. However,the groundbome noise and vibration levels would be temporary in nature and would only occur during specified construction phases. In addition,the distances to sensitive receptors would greatly lessen groundbome noise and vibration perceived at local sensitive receptors. Therefore,this impact is considered less than significant and no mitigation is required. TRAFFIC Operations of the EPSA and OCP project would modify impacts to traffic locally. Regarding the EPSA, projected numbers of District personnel listed on page 3-32 of the PEIR would not change substantially as a result of the EPSA project. Operation of the OCP would not increase truck traffic since the chemical delivery trucks servicing these new locations would replace the trucks that previously delivered caustic soda for the slug dosing application method. In addition, the slug application method of discharging caustic soda to the sewer through manholes requires temporary lane closures lasting less than a whole day. In areas where permanent continuous feed systems are installed,slug application would be eliminated, reducing the need for lane closures. This would reduce the existing level of impact. IX. FINDINGS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVES The 1999 PEIR,as supplemented by the SEIR addressed alternatives to the program. For purposes of the Final SEIR,the alternatives to the proposed EPSA and OCP, include proceeding in accordance with the program analyzed in the PEIR,which included upgrading the existing Foster Pump Station and continuing caustic soda application for odor control. The following specific economic, legal,social,technological or other considerations make these alternatives, which entail proceeding under the original program infeasible or outweighed by the benefits of this project As stated on page 2-1 of the Final SEIR,the District conducted a study assessing the Foster Pump Station upgrade project identified in the 1999 Strategic Plan and evaluated in the Program EIR. The study concluded that the Foster Pump Station was ineffective and located on an active fault. ESA I9M36 ATTACHMENT A-FINDINGS OF FAR As such,the study recommended construction of a new pumping facility. The study also concluded that upgrading the Foster Pump Station would be costly for the minimal benefit provided. Based on this recommendation,the District developed the EPSA project to avoid these impacts in a cost effective manner. The EPSA project would avoid impacts that the original project as conceived in the 1999 Strategic Plan would not. The OCP was developed to provide greater odor reduction benefit in the collection system than the original program described in the 1999 Strategic Plan. The OCP would reduce odor and corrosion impacts more effectively than the original program with minimal cost differences. X. FINDINGS CONCERNING MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL SEIR THAT WILL BE ELIMINATED AND WILL NOT BE ADOPTED AS PART OF THE PROJECT OR IN THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN The Final SEIR identifies Mitigation Measure 3.7-4 that would require all soil haul trucks leaving the treatment plant to allow 3 minute intervals at a minimum between departures to avoid bunching at local intersections and surface streets. The District has determined that this mitigation measure is infeasible because it would impose undue burdens on haul truck operations, substantially increasing construction periods,substantially reducing efficiency and increasing costs to such a degree. Furthermore, Mitigation Measure 3.7-1 was identified in the Final SEIR on page 3.7-4 as being sufficient in and of itself to reduce the identified impacts to peak hour traffic to a less than significant level. Therefore, Mitigation Measure 3.7-4 will not be adopted as pan of the project and will not be included in the MMRP. BA/% % 12 ATTACHMENT B - MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM UA I96 ATTACHMENT B-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX AND COLLECTION SYSTEM ODOR AND CORROSION CONTROL PRORAM EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX(EPSA) AIR QUALITY Impact 3.1-I: Construction of the EPSA would emit criteria pollutants. Estimated daily average construction emissions would not exceed significance thresholds set by the SCAQMD. Measure(M-3.1-1) Soil removal contractors shall cover all trucks hauling soil,sand,and other loose materials,or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Maintain record of site inspection(i.e. truck OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications trips, coverage for administrative record) AESTHETICS Impact 3.2-1:The new EPSA pump station building would be visible from adjacent residential neighborhoods and PCH. Measure(M-3.2-1)The contractor shall replace damaged landscaping and restore the construction area near the property boundary to a condition similar to existing conditions. B-1 Porimmn.l ki.M W. ATTACHMENT R-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications contract specifications. Maintain record of activities communication and pre and post-construction site conditions for administrative record GEOLOGY AND SOILS Impact 3.3-1: The proposed EPSA and OCP project could expose people or structures to potential adverse effects due to rupture of a known earthquake fault, strong ground shaking,ground failure, including liquefaction and landslides due to seismic activity. Measure(M-6.6-1e in the PEIR)During the project design phase for all facilities,the District will perform design-level geolechnical evaluations. The geotehcnical evaluations will include subsurface exploration and review of seismic design criteria to ensure that design of the facilities meet seismic safety requirements ofthe Uniform Building Code. Site-specific testing for soils susceptible to liquefaction would be conducted. If testing results indicates that conditions are present that could result in significant liquefaction and damage to project facilities,appropriate feasible measures will be developed and incorporated into the project design. The performance standard to be used in the geotechnical evaluation for mitigation liquefaction hazards will be minimization ofthe hazards. Measures to minimize significant liquefaction hazards could include the following: • Densification or dewatering of surface or subsurface soils • Construction of pile or pier foundations to support pipelines and/or buildings • Removal of material that could undergo liquefaction in the event ofan earthquake and replacement with stable material. Recommendations ofthe geotechnical report wilt be incorporated into the design and construction of proposed facilities. Measure(M-6.6-lb in the PEER) Seismic Safety. The District will design and construct new facilities in accordance with District seismic standards and/or meet or exceed seismic,design standards in the most recent edition of the Califamia Building Code. B-2 Fsriromnwnsl acirnce A .kau s ATTACHMENT B-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP Impact 3.3-2: The proposed EPSA project could be located on expansive soil,creating risks to proposed structures. Refer to Measure 6.6-16 of the PEIR and implementation procedure described above. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD Prior to approving final design and specifications contract specification construction Maintain record of construction Prior to and during construction specifications, geotechnical evaluation, soil surveys and construction oversight for administrative record HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Impact 3.4-1: The proposed EPSA and OCP project would include the transport,storage,and use of diesel fuel and odor reduction chemicals that could pose a spill or leak hazard. Measure(M-3.4-1) Storage and use of hazardous materials at the Treatment Plant and OCP sites throughout the service area will comply with state and federal regulations and storage and dispensing permits will be obtained as necessary. Measure(M-3.4-5) Any contaminated soils encountered on the project site during demolition,site clearance,or construction activities shall be removed from the project site and disposed ofoff--site in accordance with applicable hazardous waste regulations. Measure(M-3.4-6) Structures to be demolished will be investigated for the presence of lead paint or asbestos containing material and proper precautions will betaken for safe removal and disposal of these materials prior to demolition activities. B-3 Enrimrvntnul Rim¢AaaWn ATTACHMENT B-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM MIR FOR EPSA AND GCP IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Contractor's SPCC Plan to be approved by OCSD Prior to installation specifications the District's Safety Division 2. Modify OCSD SPCC Monitor compliance with the approved construction contract specifications, OCSD's Prior to and during installation 3. Notify Orange County Health Care Agency SPCC and approved contractor SPCC Compliance with approved asbestos and lead paint removal plans. Monitor removals and maintain adminstrative record HYDROLOGY Impact 3.5-1: The proposed EPSA and OCP project could violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Measure(M-3.5-1) The District will prepare a SWPPP that will identify BMPs to minimize water quality impacts resulting from EPSA constmction activities. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MOMTORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY B-A Envim==W Seieme Aswcitl ATTACHMENT E-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP I. Include in construction contract SWPPP to be reviewed and approved by OCSD Prior to construction specifications OCSD's Environmental Compliance & Monitoring Division 2. Contractor to comply with BMPs outlined in the OCSD's Storm Water Management Plan Maintain record of site inspections and Ongoing construction oversight. Impact 3.5-3: The proposed EPSA and OCP project would be susceptible to potential flooding impacts. Measure(M-3.5-2) The District shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Orange County Flood Control District prior to work within the Santa Ana Riverlevee. Measure(M-3.5-3) No construction activities would be conducted within the Santa Ana River channel. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Coordinate with OCFCD Maintain record of communication with OCSD Prior to and during construction affected agency, encroachment permits and 2. Include in construction contract construction oversight for administrative specifications record 3.Obtain OCFCD permit NOISE Impact 3.6-1:Operations ofthe proposed EPSA and OCP project would generate noise. B-5 Enriromnenirl Sd..Armdnta ATTACHMENT B-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP Measure (M-3.6-1) The EPSA and emergency generator buildings will be designed to insulate noise of the machinery such that fence- line noise standards would not be exceeded. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Maintain record of construction oversight for OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications. administrative record Impact 3.6-2:The proposed EPSA project would generate noise during construction. Measure(M-3.6-2) During construction phases, the contractor shall ensure that all construction is performed in accordance with the City of Huntington Beach and Orange County noise standards. Measure(M-3.6-3)All equipment used during construction should be muffled and maintained in good operating condition. All internal combustion engine driven equipment should be fined with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Maintain record of construction oversight and OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications project communication(i.e. public notices, construction schedule) for administrative record B-6 En.k.l Ri.a.e A.. i. ATTACHMENT B-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP TRAFFIC Impact 3.7-1: Periods of peak construction of the proposed EPSA and OCP project would add to traffic along local access streets. Measure(M-3.7-1) Dirt haul trucks and construction deliveries shall avoid peak traffic periods(7:00—9:00 AM and 4:00—6:00 PM)to the extent feasible. Measure (M-3.7-2) Parking for construction workers shall be provided on District property for each phase of construction. Measure(M-3.7-3) Projects that would require lane closure or excavation within a Caltrans right-of-way including the PCH must comply with Caltrans' Encroachment Permit application process. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD specifications contract specifications. Prior to and during construction 2. Obtain permit from Caltmns Maintain record of traffic control plan, permits, and inspection of pre and post- construction site B-7 Emiro..,Sli ..A..W. ATTACHMENT B-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP COLLECTION SYSTEM ODOR AND CORROSION CONTROL PROGRAM(OCP) AESTHETICS Impact 3.2-2: The tanks for the OCP could be visible from adjacent land uses. Measure(M-3.2-2) When siting future chemical feed systems, the District will prioritize industrial sites, such as storage yards, which are generally not adjacent to sensitive land uses. If an industrial site is not available, the District will attempt to place the chemical storage tanks out of public view. The District will shield the tanks from public view using fencing or by other means as appropriate to match the existing character of the surrounding area. Measure(M-3.2-3) The District will coordinate with the cities prior to installing new chemical storage tanks in the service area. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Evaluate prospective storage sites Maintain record of communications with OCSD Prior to and after tank installation affected agencies, pre and post-construction 2. Coordinate with cities to determine conditions, and construction oversight for compatibility of use administrative record. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Impac13.3-1: The proposed EPSA and OCP project could expose people or stmctures to potential adverse effects due to mpture of a known earthquake fault, strong ground shaking,ground failure,including liquefaction and landslides due to seismic activity. Measure(M-3.3-1) Chemical storage tanks and appurtenant piping and connections will be designed to withstand ground shaking to avoid potential spills during a seismic event. B-g Emimnm oS.m.A.W. ATTACHMENT E-MMGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM MIR FOR EMA AND OCP IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with approved OCSD Prior to and during installation of specifications construction contract specifications. tanks HAZARDS AND MAZARDOU/SMATER/ALS Impact 3.44: The proposed EPSA and OCP pmject would include the transport,storage,and use of diesel fuel and odor reduction chemicals that could pose a spill or leak hautard. Measure(M-3.4-1)Storage and use of hamrdous materials at the Treatment Plant and OCP sites throughout the service area will comply with state and federal regulations and storage and dispensing permits will be obtained as necessary. Measure(M-3.4-2)The District will follow procedures to ensure proper handling and storage of hazardous materials and reduce the potential for spills at the OCP chemical storage sites. At a minimum, the procedures will include: • obtain a permit to store hazardous materials from the local fire department; • provide notification to the Orange County Health Care Agency of the site location and caustic soda application site; • equip chemical delivery tracks with spill cleanup equipment adequate to contain and clean up any solid or liquid spill; - • equip chemical storage tanks with adequate secondary containment; • modify the District's SPCC Plan to include the OCP chemical storage sites or ensure that chemical transport contractors have adequate SPCC plans in place covering the chemical storage sites. The SPCC Plan will cover chemical transfer activities (including DOT requirements), public notification and placarding requirements, secondary containment, emergency spill response actions, routine site access control, and site management and maintenance procedures. The contractor's SPCC Plan would require approval by the District's Safely Division. Measure(M-3.43) The District shall require that all personnel working with hazardous chemicals have health and safety training. This is a legal OSHA requirement under the Worker Right to Know regulations in the Federal Code of Regulations,Title 29. The training shall include,at minimum,the proper use of safely equipment,hazard identifications,and proper handling and disposal of spilled hazardous materials. B-9 ATTACHMENT R-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP Measure (M-3.44) Access to OCP chemical storage sites will be controlled to allow access only to authorized personnel. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Contractor's SPCC Plan to be approved by OCSD Prior to installation specifications the District's Safety Division 2. Modify OCSD SPCC Monitor compliance with the approved construction contract specifications, OCSD's Prior to and during installation 3. Notify Orange County Health Care Agency SPCC and approved contractor SPCC 4.Obtain permit from fire departments Impact 3.4-2:OCP chemical storage site construction could impair or interfere with emergency response routes. Measure(M-3.4-7)The District will provide notice of construction and lane closures lasting more than one day to local emergency service providers within 72 hours prior to construction activities. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Maintain record of signage, public(i.e. OCSD Prior to and during conehuction specifications business and fire department)notifications, inspections, and construction schedule for 2. Include 24-hour emergency access in administrative record construction contract specifications B-10 Emiewx¢Nal 56.A,".. ATTACHMENT B-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP HYDROLOGY Impact 3.5-3: The proposed EPSA and OCP project would be susceptible to potential Flooding impacts. Measure (M-3.54) No chemical storage tanks shall be installed within the FEMA-designated 100-year Floodplain. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Compliance with approved construction OCSD Prior to installation specifications contract specifications Prior to and during installation 2. Inspection of storage tank site locations Maintain record of construction oversight for administrative record TRAFFIC Impact 3.7-1: Periods of peak construction of the proposed EPSA and OCP project would add to traffic along local access streets. Measure (M-3.7.3)Projects that would require lace closure or excavation within a Carters right-of-way including the PCH most comply with Callrans' Encroachment Permit application process. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY B-11 Envirarvnemol&inrcs Avaiue • O ATTACHMENT B-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR EPSA AND OCP I. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD specifications contract specifications. Prior to and during wnstruction 2.Obtain permit from Caltmns Maintain record of traffic control plan, permits, and inspection of pre and post- construction site B-12 p,,.imminu.i soma Asian BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I TOI or Dir. tz/te/oz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number _ is Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: William Cassidy, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO THE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-7-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide reimbursement to the District of costs estimated at$969,000, and to provide for additional engineering services at no cost,for correction of a design error for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2; (2)Approve plans and specifications for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2. on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (3)Approve Addenda No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (4) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and Recommendation; and, (5)Award a construction contract to Cora Constructors for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2,for an amount not to exceed $738,000. SUMMARY • The five 200-horsepower (hp) sewage pumps installed (November 1998)on the station's easterly bay as part of"Improvements to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1', cavitate. Cavitation, the collapse of vapor bubbles as Flow passes through the pump, causes rapid wear and excessive vibration in the pump. Cavitation also reduces the pump's capacity and efficiency. Designed for a total capacity of 40.4 million gallons per day (mgd)to handle peak wet weather (stone)flows, the pumps have to date been restricted to 30.5 mgd to eliminate the cavitation. • Boyle Engineering Corporation (Boyle), design consultant for Contract No. 7-7-1, and Staff investigated the cause of and reviewed numerous remedies to minimize and/or eliminate the cavitation. Staff determined that the pumps must be replaced to meet the needed capacity and permanently eliminate cavitation. • Orange County Sanitation District (District)established a project and budget(March 2001)for Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, to replace the pumps and track the costs. The project is being administered in accordance to standard District policies and procedures. • Boyle is providing design engineering and construction support services for the project at no cost to the District. Boyle has also agreed to enter into a Reimbursement Agreement to reimburse costs incurred by the District for the construction contract, staff engineering, construction administration and inspection. • Boyle will deposit or cause to be deposited funds as outlined in the reimbursement agreement into an interest-bearing escrow account prior to the District's notice to proceed to the construction contractor. The District will invoice Boyle and withdrawal from the escrow account monthly an amount equal to the costs incurred by the District for the previous month. Boyle shall also deposit additional funds for costs associated with change orders or increased costs over and above the estimated costs at the time they are incurred by the District. Any funds remaining in the account at the finish of the project will be remitted to Boyle. • Boyle Engineering Corporation completed the plans and specifications in October 2002. One Addendum was issued during the bid period that made miscellaneous clarifications and modifications. Sealed bids were received on November 7, 2002. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget $969,000 Construction Budget $740,000 Engineer's Estimate $740,000 Low Bid $738,000 Low Responsive Bid $738,000 High Bid $850.700 Number of Bids 4 • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to the low bidder, Cora Constructors, for an amount not to exceed $738,000 and authorization of funds for construction administration and inspection. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$738,000 for the construction contract and $122,000 for construction administration and inspection is being requested. A reallocation of$11,000 from Contingency and Construction Contract to Design Staff is also being requested. The authorization is within the project's budget for FY2001/02, as amended by Board action on September 25, 2002. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:20o212003 Budget Sedon8 pages 7&50.Ccmed No.7.7-2., as amended September 25,2002) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The budget serves as a means to track costs that are to be reimbursed by the Design Consultant. G%x dla�Wda�dAgenE R¢ QW2 ew,G Agenda Reo 1N0 M18.Moe 7.7.2 dX Rews WOMI Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • The District is to provide, in accordance with District policies and procedures, contract administration and inspection services with respect to replacing the pumps. • The District shall credit Boyle for increased costs should the new pumps or related equipment exceed the costs of the original equipment since those costs would have been incurred had the equipment been originally specified. Such a credit has yet to be determined. • Boyle shall take possession of the existing, deficient pumps, and related equipment (e.g. spare parts) being replaced. • Boyle shall reimburse the District for its actual engineering, inspection, administrative, and construction costs associated with the project. ALTERNATIVES No altematives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS This project is a continuation of the Improvements to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1. The project will replace pumps to correct a design error by the design consultant. Contract No. 7-7-1 was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and Notice of Determination was filed on July 30, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation WC:jo e1wp.dtatagendatBoard Agenda ReportsM02 Board Agenda Reports\12o2\Item 18.Bo91e.7-7-2400 swnamaornaaiaona eamex e.om V=eo AWW ae�%12=m u.a e�r-ae= ae.xe: erzan, Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MODIFICATIONS TO THE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 7-7-2 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development Studies/PermiBin Consultant PSA Des', nStaf $ 30,000 $ 10,000 $ 11,000V738,000 $ 10,000 $ 11,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 100% Construction Contrail $ 285,000 $ 740.000 E 2,000 $ 738,000 $ 738.000 Construction Administration $ 28,000 $ 57.ODO $ - $ 57,000 $ 57.000 Construction Ins action $ 27.000 $ 65.000 $ - $ 65,OOD $ 65,000 Contin en $ 75.000 $ 97,000 $ ,000 PROJECT TOTAL $ 445,000 $ 969.000 1 $ - $ 969,000 $ 10.000 5 671,000 $ 881.000 $ 21.000 1 2% Reimbursable Costs $ 445.000 1 $ 969.000 1 $ - $ 969.000 PROJECT NET 1 $0 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $ 10,000 1 $ 871.000 1 $ 881,000 $ 21,00 22% C:W 4eNetWIPQAR 7A-2 Construclon Contract Budget tablet 121902.4sIDistncls November 7, 2002 11:00 a.m. BID TABULATION MODIFICATION TO THE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION Contract No. 7-7-2 Engineer's Estimate: $740,000 Construction Contract Budget: $ CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. CORA CONSTRUCTORS $ 738,000 2. S.S. MECHANICAL CORPORATION $ 739,769 3. PAULUS ENGINEERING, INC. $ 819,000 4. PASCAL & LUDW IG CONSTRUCTORS $ 850,700 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to CORA CONSTRUCTORS in the bid amount of$738,000 as the lowest and best bid. �2;k� David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering C\FileNetWIP%7-7-2 Bid Ta d.c Revised 05119198 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 , Fountain valley,CA 92728.8127 . (714) 962-2411 t t t t t t t �,eecutiu� �uHr�rrawc� t ■ ■ ■ - Prepared for PARSONS I GHO Orange County Sanitation District ■ November 19, 2002 ■ C Executive Summary [ Road Map of Strategic Planning Steps C 2. 6. L ' - Right for Us7 C 4 C: Consldenng the -� 7. 3. How and 4. 'Gap:What 5. How Snouc 7• r How Do our AM Should be the P�� When Do We Camporlenls of our AM lmpmo emen; How Do We Measure Up? 'Fill the Gap AM Impeovement Program Move Ahead' m AM Pmctice9 Program' be organized. rl 4 L C $� What are the Candusions an0 RemlmmaMatims7 [ 9. '� C eU+AM Mn C aM Frnmwak Ana"M [ C C C Asset 14(apmeKt A-ateaic Pl a 74ssETtil741tl4 FIIO'fiVTSTP7477�G Phil/ i OCSD Executive Management Team Blake Anderson Greg Mathews Gary Streed Bob Ghirelli Patrick Miles Lisa Tomko David Ludwm Bob Ooten � r ' 01 Asset Project Team OCSD Management Committee Operations&Maintenance Doug StewartAM Program Manager Orange Count' Nick Amontes Greg Mathews Sanitation Dis w Shabbir Basrai Dave Hevig Bob Bell Matt Smith Bill Kennedy Project Manager Parsons/GHD Dan Cordova Selwyn Mansell ' Jim Burror Edith Smith Lynn Norton Deputy Project Manager Parsonsi I' Allan Duntoo Mark Mutz Dan Dillon Doug Slewan Roger Byme AM Technical Director Parsons/GHD I. Mad Eddy Joseph Park ' Marc Dubois John Swindler * Duncan Rose AM Technical Director Parsons/GHD Chuck Forman Ed Pendleton Mark Esquer Rob Thompson Ross McPherson AM Specialist ParsonslGHD Richard Hargraves Les Thompson ' Dave Halverson Simon Watson Brenton Marshall AM Specialist Parsons/GHD Rod Wade Jim Herberg Mike White Sharon Cummings Technical Support Parsons/GHD Gerald Jones' Ernest Yeboah Steve Al@ee Contributing Author US Environmental Howard Lembke Protection Agency I 'Consultant Romp PARSONS 2 '�- I I fusee �a7apewe(e yet'aee'air' Peaa I . I Pi�e�aee This section was contributed by Blake Anderson, General Manager, Orange County Sanitation District Recently, a public infrastructure report card for Orange County was released and was the subject of very good press coverage. The report card underlined the need for a better approach to how we manage our public assets. Water, wastewater,traffic, schools,parks, Flood control, airports, and landfills received individual grades ranging from B to D. Billions of dollars of unmet current needs and projected future needs are the clear I implication of the report card. Much needs to be done. The question for all of us is this: how do we approach this need, set our priorities, and move ahead? Money, money, money is the quick response. But 1 think the response must be far more thoughtful than that. Asset management embraces a number of broad principles dealing with how public agencies like OCSD make decisions about public infrastructure. It integrates planning, design, construction, operations, maintenance, funding, warehousing, rehabilitation, replacement, disposal, data management, and strategic decision-making for one purpose: to provide cost-effective(and sustainable) public infrastructure. We can learn much from the decade-long experience of the Australians and New Zealanders. They, too, faced the problem of aging (and decaying) infrastructure and Blake Anderson addressing staff during developed the principles of asset management. Strategic Planning Workshop I Over the next several years, the District will be implementing a comprehensive asset management program. Asset management will become the overarching management principle for how we approach our responsibility of being good stewards of the assets that we own. Whether you approach asset management from your head, your pocketbook, or your heart, there is something in this endeavor for everyone. If your head says look for an orderly and coherent process, asset management is for you. If your pocketbook looks for cost effectiveness, asset management is for you. If your heart says look for a process that gives voice to the best ideas and provides more certainty about how an individual can effectively understand the future of the organization,asset management is for you. As we all begin to face the reality of the cost and challenge of sustainable public infrastructure, we must become conversant with all of the possible approaches to success. I PARSONS -it- I i 1 Awe 1Grgy,&xe,,rt ftt-a&gir, Pla7 1 Local, state, and federal funding is but one suite of possibilities. Public education and 1 outreach to bring the public's attention to the problem is going to be very important. But in the end, it will be the long-term practices, policies, and day-to-day work interactions 1 that we all employ that will provide the solution. 1 Asset management is a necessary cornerstone of our future sustainability as an agency, as county,as a state, and as nation. I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 PARSONS2 -iii- 1 1 1 Amet /ffaKageHre (( &-ate,aic Peal 1 1 lettef 6VX EPff 1 1 A q UMIIEp 8TP1N lasymoNtileansu.PXOTECTOX AGENCY WSHINGT0 N,0,C. 20440 1 OCT Iaare Blake Andamn,General Manager 1 Omnge County SBnitetbn Di P.O.Box 8127 w..0 1 Fountain Valley,Ca 9272MI27 Deaf W.Anderson: 1 Recently,USEPAAEminismsor Christine Whitman released the findings of our -Chen Water and Danking Water lnkesrruclum Gap Anslysm'. Theerelysis Comes on Me size and naWre of Me gap between project"watomwastawaler 1 Infrastructure needs for the nap 20 years and revenues for the same period, I As you might as act,the results are troubling-the gap,by any measure.Is substantial.II le clear that major challenges Ile ahead However,a significant eseedpn of the analysis Is that the gap(with as dad Implications for sustained I pedonnanCo)Is not InevilablB-and that ono of the for Mola that Can.sets(In reducing the gap is'asset management. We am convinced that the applbelbn of advanced easel management practices Can substantially reduce total Ida Cycle .so for CS.Utilities. II am same.form our all of your Consi,a ..hurls,to move your NIMy toward an asset management driven ogen ration. I would Ilea to lake a moment M ' Compliment thee.efforts and to Commend Me Commitment of you,your Well and your Board.Orange County Barr elbn OlstmA is clearly leading the country in Ile asset management vision.Only through such efforts,will this Country be able M ' p.We Me eustalmal performance 1mm us was,Inhaseuclure Investment that car prosperity and quality of life have come M depend upon. 1 PI.ase be Aware Met,a0 an organization,we stand ready to assist per effer s M Ma fellaat extend feasible.WIN your permission.I have Naked Mr.Slew Anises, Project Creches.Gap Analysis,to continue M advise me of your progmu and M Iassist where pmcralkel.Beat of luck In your,efforts. ASincsral / O.To,,t,111 .' Assistant Administrator I 1 •.n,+*...ur+.r...r.m..w�+.o-err...srw+rs.,ivi.r.mw..�.�srs PARSONS - —�_ Ic- I I Ayeet /laaajeare ( Ytwategie �ea7 Execatae JCl/lfAPaw� Introduction Since July 1998 OCSD has been engaged in the District Assessment and Reinvention ' Team (DART) process in an effort to close the competitive gap in the Operations and Maintenance Department identified in a March 1996 competitive assessment. DART's initiation of several work process and system enhancements in the operations and maintenance areas resulted in the achievement of significant benefits for the District. The progress made by DART and other initiatives throughout the organization has become the foundation for the asset management initiative that this strategic plan addresses. Beginning in 2000, as part of the DART work, the OCSD staff began researching infrastructure asset management practices. The staff found that substantial benefits had been achieved by agencies that applied comprehensive, agency-wide advanced asset management practices. This was particularly evident in Australia and New Zealand where asset management had been a focused national priority for over 15 years. Based ' on the potential benefit that OCSD could derive from asset management, the Board approved a contract in April 2002 for a strategic plan and framework analysis report. The exhibit on the inside cover depicts the flow of strategic steps that led to the development of the OCSD Asset Management Strategic Plan. This Executive Summary is organized to answer the key strategic questions shown. The major headings are in fact I the questions. ' Total Enterprise Asset Management Total Enterprise Asset Management means, "Managing assets to minimize the cost of owning and operating them while continuously delivering the desired customer service." fOCSD Asset Management Committee) "Asset management embraces a number of broad principles dealing with how public agencies like counties, cities, and special districts make decisions about public infrastructure. It integrates planning, design, construction, operations, maintenance, funding, warehousing, rehabilitation, replacement, disposal, data management and PAASDNS�M' E&I I 1 1 ftsset Naaa�eweKt rS'twatepie, Plan 1 strategic decision making for one purpose: to provide cost-effective (and sustainable) public infrastructure" (Blake Anderson) 1 How Do Our Asset Management Practices Measure Up? 1 Australia and New 'Zealand are recognized world leaders in advanced asset management. A sophisticated and comprehensive assessment tool developed in Australia, which has been applied to over 100 utilities and is calibrated against recognized worldwide asset management best practices, was used to objectively measure and evaluate OCSD's current asset management practices. The assessment showed that OCSD currently performs with excellence in many or the areas measured; however, there are several significant asset management best practices that simply have not been deployed at OCSD, or any other major U.S. utility. There are also several existing practices, processes, and tools that can and should be enhanced. The assessment tool scores organizations on the basis of "confidence level" which is a rating that reflects the level of confidence an organization and its stakeholders can have in the data, information, and decision-making tools and processes an organization uses related to its infrastructure and the services those assets provide. Confidence level scores relate directly to the application of best practices. They are quantifiable and measurable, and provide an objective rating of asset management practices. The assessment tool can also be used to audit the progress of an organization's development of asset management practices. The overall assessment confidence level rating scores for OCSD are: ■ Pre DART Program(1996) status...............................................................47% ■ Current status(2002)..................................................................................68% The following confidence level benchmark scores are provided for comparison: Average large Australian wastewater businesses.......................................81% Top 10% of Australian businesses..............................................................90% Average of all assessed Australian businesses...........................................86% It is important to note that the best practices changes in both operations and maintenance associated with the DART initiative and other internal initiatives significantly improved the District's asset management rating. Enhanced maintenance practices, work process PARSONS ES-2 I 1 1 4=,( /ffa7ayeHfeKt A-ategie Peaa I modifications and information system advancements were all developed by DART. Other initiatives not included in DART resulted in work process refinements such as the restructuring in Engineering, which enhanced capital project planning and delivery. 1 Other initiatives like the J-42 project that provided loop diagrams and equipment numbering, the Facilities Atlas project that provided enhanced system drawings, and internal modifications to inventory practices were all best practices enhancements. While there is a significant gap between OCSD and the benchmarks, the Parsons/GHD Team 1 believes that the District probably leads most major US utilities in asset management I practices,as a result of its DART Program and other initiatives. 1 -- - What is the Appropriate Level of Asset Management for Us? Confidence level improvement targets for OCSD were collaboratively set by OCSD's Asset Management Committee, Executive Management Team, and other members of the staff. The targets are: • 3-year improvement target .........................................................................81% 1 ... , • 4[o10-year(BAP) improvement target .....................................................92% i There was consensus by all OCSD staff and management members participating in the •5�4, asset management strategic planning processes that advanced asset management is 1 y _ appropriate for OCSD. How and When Should We Fill the Gap? Workshop participants choosing AM Improvement 1 Program 3-year and BAP targets Two 2-day workshops, numerous interviews, and a comprehensive gap analysis process led to consensus regarding the specific and best appropriate Total Enterprise Asset Management (TEAM) improvement components with which to "fill the gap." Specific 1 improvement components for the Total Enterprise Asset Management (TEAM) Program were selected and prioritized into two major implementation phases: a 3-year period, and 1 a Best Appropriate Practices (BAP) period of 4 to 10 years. The recommended target confidence level scores for each of these periods resulted from the gap analysis processes. 1 The targets set for each implementation planning period, and the improvement components identified and selected to accomplish filling the gap, were predicated on the 1 approval and deployment of the implementation strategies contained in the TEAM I PARSONS ES-3 I t t A8set Aaa�exre re xfe,-az �le Pia, Program Charter, which is discussed below in "How Should the AM Improvement t Program be Organized?" t Considering the Gap, Which Component Improvements are Needed for Our Asset Management? t Some 1500 specific best practices, which correspond directly to confidence level scores, were considered in the gap analysis process. Through collaborative workshops, 274 individual best appropriate practices improvements were selected for inclusion in the t OCSD TEAM Program, and are the basis for the targeted confidence level score goals. t The preliminary list of improvement components is appended to this report. This list will be refined and modified during detailed implementation planning, which is recommended t as the next phase of the District's TEAM Program. These improvement components are necessary to "fill the gap"between current practices t and targeted best appropriate practices, and are required for the District to achieve the benefits that can be realized from improved asset management. t How Should the Asset Management Improvement t Program be Organized? A proposed TEAM Program Charter was developed that established the critical strategic "7 ° _ framework for the program. The TEAM Program Charter was collaboratively developed as part of the strategic planning process The TEAM Charter provides the unified strategic level guidance necessary to advance the program's development through the implementation planning and implementation phases of the TEAM Program. The TEAM Charter includes the following statements: t • Future External Stakeholder Perception Internal TEAM Mission t • Key Business Strategy t �. • Implementation Strategies,and OCSD staff working on TEAM Charter Program • TEAM Commitments to AM (over-arching principles)—presented in the body of this report,but not included in this Executive Summary. I I PARSONS ES-4 I I 1 Afn,( /ffaaayeme e Ye^atzpie PeaK I The Following elements of the TEAM Charter are presented and briefly discussed below. 1 External Stakeholder Perception Statement i Our customers, our peers, regulatory agencies, and other stakeholders recognize us as being innovative, efficient, and effective stewards of the OCSD infrastructure assets and for being leaders in total enterprise asset management. This .statement reflects how OCSD wants the performance of its TEAM Program to be perceived and valued by those stakeholders outside the organization. Internal TEAM Mission Our TEAM mission is to plan, create, acquire, maintain, operate, rehabilitate, replace, and dispose of assets in the most cost-effective manner at the required level of service for present and future generations. This statement reflects the mission of the TEAM Program from an internal OCSD perspective. Key Business Strategy OCSD will use TEAM as a primary means of reducing total life cycle infrastructure costs; sustaining a high-quality Level of Service; applying risk mitigation and management; meeting environmental compliance requirements; and meeting other organizational goals. _ -c. v This .statement presents the strategic intent of the TEAM Program, and is proposed to become one of OCSD's key business strategies. TEAM Program Implementation Strategies The following are the proposed implementation strategies for the TEAM Program improvement components. They will he deployed through the planning and OCSD managers debating and deciding implementation phases of the program. Each of these strategies is essential to the on TEAM Program strategies successful implementation of the program. They are designed to maximize early benefits and ensure that necessary foundational change elements of the program are developed and institutionalized. I I PARSONS ES-5 I I I asset /laKqaeareKt Stwate,,aie Mal( 1 The strategies are largely self-explanatory, but summary discussion is included where amplification is considered necessary. The TEAM Program implementation strategies are, 1. OCSD will use structured and detailed implementation planning as the means of determining the specific objectives, tasks, priority, schedule, and resource levels necessary to effectively implement the short-term and long-term asset management program supported by an appropriate business case. This ensures that the entire TEAM Program is appropriately planned, budgeted and scheduled to deliver maximum benefit to OCSD. 2. OCSD will provide additional resources necessary to effectively implement the TEAM Program. OCSD will augment existing staff with the additional staff, consultant and contractor resources needed to deploy the identified AM improvement program tasks with minimal disruption to the organization, and its current workloads. The potential benefits in terms of life cycle cost management, service sustainability, and focused asset management decision-making warrants the deployment of the I TEAM Program as a primary activity within the District for several years. The OCSD staff already has many significant initiatives in progress, and has limited I additional staff resources available to take judicious and timely advantage of the opportunities that TEAM presents. The forecasted cost-to-benefit ratio and other benefits of a fully deployed comprehensive asset management program support the strategy of augmenting and supplementing OCSD normal staffing levels with transitional resources. The asset management program recommendations developed during this strategic planning project received broad support from management and staff. The single largest concern expressed had nothing to do with the "what' or the "why" aspects of the program, but rather "how" the program could be deployed in the face of current workloads. 3. OCSD will create an asset information hierarchy to provide appropriate roll-up information necessary for confident TEAM decision-making, and to align with and support advanced infrastructure processes and applications planned for the TEAM Program. I PARSONS ES-6 I 1 1 ftsset �a7a�ehfeKt etm6,flo Peaa 1 The asset information hierarchy determines the way TEAM information systems are 1 structured to make the TEAM Program decision-making information, tools, processes, and procedures available to the staff in the appropriate format and with the 1 appropriate focus for their decision-making roles. 1 4. OCSD will leverage information technologies to support TEAM processes, and will systematically move toward advanced, user-friendly software applications 1 and comprehensive systems integration and interconnectivity. I The TEAM Program goals require the extensive use of information systems and technologies. Information needs to be consistent, timely, properly formatted, and 1 easy to use in order to be of meaningful decision-making value. Systems integration, interconnectivity, and user-friendly software applications are essential to the long- term success of the TEAM Program. S. OCSD will leverage the use of improved applications processes, and procedures 1 "Key to this is the prompt replacement to enhance knowledge capture and retention (from experienced, knowledgeable of the am rent CMMS.system." staff, retirees, and consultants) and to improve overall data and knowledge Workshop attendees identified this as a availability and use. critically important implementation 1 strategy. Using new processes in conjunction with new software applications will enable timely,efficient, and effective analysis and evaluation of asset information to support high quality asset decision-making. 1 6. OCSD will initiate a systematic program of condition assessment necessary to support asset-planning activities,and provide a meaningful and useful reporting system. I Knowing, tracking, and prioritizing the condition of assets are critically important to "We must commit to creating an effective asset management; this is especially true for replacement and renewal organizational structure with the decision- making, financial forecasting, and resources optimization. Condition 1 necessary resources to develop and information is fundamental to numerous other aspects of asset management. Getting I sustain the AM program while this vital information developed and in a format that supports asset management maintaining commitment to our decision-making is a key and essential strategy. I current operation." 7. OCSD will modify its organizational structure, align its organizational culture, Workshop attendees identified this as a critically important implementation and develop internal organizational development and change management ' strategy. capabilities necessary to effectively support the deployment and sustained operations of the TEAM Program. PARSONSM ES-7 I I Asuet /ffayraeHreKt Ytl-ate,aic P�aK I Comprehensive asset management requires a major shift in organizational focus if the system and task elements of the TEAM Program are to deliver maximum benefits to OCSD, and achieve the sustainability, service level, and life cycle cost benefits mission of the program. This strategy recognizes that the basic structure and focus of the organization must be modified to align with the mission of the program. Workshop attendees identified this as a S, OCSD will align and clarify its roles and responsibilities, training programs, critically important implementation and other human resource processes and systems to support TEAM strategies strategy. and goals. The TEAM Program requires that the organization be realigned around the management of its assets, realizing that these assets directly affect OCSD's ability to provide services and accomplish its mission. The TEAM Program involves new skills that require training, as well as clear definition of roles and responsibilities at all levels of the organization. The TEAM Program requires fundamental change within the organization, and the human resources systems and processes need to be modified to appropriately align with TEAM. Failure to do this will create confusion, inefficiency and ineffectiveness,and hamper the success of the Program. 9. OCSD will monitor (audit) its TEAM Program implementation progress on a periodic basis to ensure the desired confidence level improvement targets are achieved,and that critical project elements are on schedule. This strategy essentially ensures that the continuous quality improvement process is used throughout the deployment of the TEAM Program. 10. OCSD will deploy the funded 3-year TEAM Program target tasks through the use of project scheduling and management tools in order to plan and track implementation activities. These aspects of the Progmrn will be This strategy deploys sound project management techniques to ensure that the project "fast tracked"for early implementation of the improvement component projects is appropriately scheduled, implementation while planning of the other aspects of the Program is taking sequenced, resourced and tracked. plaCe. 11. OCSD will fast track Capital Expenditure Evaluation (CapEx); CMMS, Workshop attendees suggested this SCADA, and FIS integration, modifications, and replacement planning; implementation strategy and identified it as organizational structure change; roles and responsibilities clarification being critically important implementation; and asset hierarchy aspects of the program, because these are I PARSONSM ES-8 I I I I asset /�aKa�erKeKt rS'twate�ie ��an I foundational and will also be viewed as"Quick Starts"for the AM improvement program. The envisioned TEAM Program includes certain improvement components that produce significant early benefits, or that are especially crucial to the program. Implementation of these particular elements of the TEAM Program should be expedited. Why is the Asset Management Program Right for Us? The AM Program is right for OCSD because it is expected to reduce the District's total infrastructure life cycle costs by at least 15% over and above the savings already achieved by the DART program and other initiatives. The TEAM Program will help ensure the sustainability of the District's infrastructure and services, and will help the District continue to meet its environmental goals. I Estimated Financial Benefits (Savings or Funding Reallocation Opportunities) As noted in the margin, US EPA estimates that application of TEAM Program asset The US EPA estimates that management approach at typical U.S. utilities can result in total life cycle cost reductions application of Total Enterprise in the 20-30% range. Based on the best practices assessment process, and OCSD's Asset Management by US utilities resultant confidence level score, the Parsons/GHD Team found that a portion of this can reduce total life rycle costs art "typical" cost reduction potential has already been achieved at OCSD as a result of the estimated 20 to 30%. DART Program and other initiatives. The best appropriate practices recommended for the OCSD TEAM Program are expected to reduce the total life cycle costs by at least another 15%. The 25-year TEAM Program financial benefit forecast is: • 25-year Capital Improvement Program reallocation/ reduction benefits of about $75 million (which is in addition to savings that are anticipated from traditional value engineering and program management efforts already underway) • 25-year Total Life Cycle benefits are estimated to be$350 million as depicted in I Exhibit ES-I Further discussion of the financial modeling and results is found in Section 4 of this report. 1 PARSONS ES-9 1 I I I Asset /�a7a�emem(t &-ategie Peaa I W EXHIBIT EB•1. A 25-YEAR VIEW OF THE PROJECTED BENEFITS FROM TEAM PROGRAM 1 1 160 1 Net Total Annual Costs without 140 AMIP Benefits 1 1 Net 120 Initial AMIP Outlays Expected AMIP Benefits •,•r■.••` Total Exceed Initial Benefits $350 Million •�.■►• 1 Annual 100 •.■'�■•■.•■ Cost ■ ■■■.r■'����■■ ■■.••• 1 ($ Million) 80 Break Even Point Expected Net Total Annual Cost 1 with AMIP Benefits 60 1 1 40 O`1. �O ry0 rti0 �O �O rti0 rti0 rti0 rL0 s�0 ry0 ,10 rL0 Fiscal Year 1 AMIP is the recommended AM improvement Program that is designed to enable OC.5D to reach its Best Appropriate Pren tires confidence level target in 10 Years. 1 1 I I r� PARSONS ES-IO I 1 1 {�,nset �aaa�eHreat �'twate�ie P�aa 1 The Total Life Cycle TEAM Program financial benefit forecast is: 1 • $600 million (current dollars)based on 1 ■ 15% of the estimated$4 billion current value of OCSD's assets* 1 -A May 1998 System Replacement Needs Analysis report by RW Beck estimated the replacement value of OCSD's assets at$2,028 million in 1997 dollars. The magnitude of C1P 1 projects planned over the next 20 years, which now will include full secondary treatment, coupled with other adjustments, indicates that the actual replacement value of OCSD's assets 1 would fall within the range shown. In Parsons1OHD'.s opinion, the current replacement value is already closer to$4 billion than$2 billion. 1 TEAM Program Costs 1 The TEAM Program provides a strategic and management framework that focuses on 1 minimizing total infrastructure asset life cycle costs, while ensuring that OCSD's levels of service are being met on a consistent and sustained basis,at an acceptable business risk 1 exposure level. The TEAM Program framework helps prioritize and integrate various aspects of OCSD's operations, processes, practices, and systems in a focused and logical 1 manner. Because TEAM comprises best management practices, program costs include many that 1 OCSD would probably chose to implement over time during the normal course of its 1 business, whether or not the TEAM Program existed. For example, the information systems integration, systems control and data acquisition equipment (SCADA), and 1 software applications replacement (such as the computerized maintenance management system) are all items that OCSD would eventually replace with or without the TEAM 1 Program framework. In essence, the proposed TEAM Program aggregates and accelerates costs that would have been incurred eventually in order to achieve the 1 benefits earlier, and accomplish the implementation of the best appropriate practices in a structured, integrated,and effective way. 1 The TEAM Program approach enables OCSD to focus on the application of best appropriate practices, which are consistent with excellence in utility management. The 1 TEAM approach provides the coordination and integration of these practices within a 1 sound strategic,planning and organizational framework. 1 PARSONS ES-II 1 i i � ><fsset Aa7a�eNreKt Ytwategie P�aa 1 The costs estimated here are not additional costs, but are cods consolidated for the purposes of developing the asset management business case, and establishing a TEAM Program budget. The costs are based on Parsons(GHD's experience from many similar programs in Australia and New Zealand. The preliminary strategic level cost estimate for the TEAM Program framework is $22 - $38 million over a 6 to 10-year period (2002 dollars). These estimates include OCSD manpower, implementation planning and ' assistance, information systems changes, new software purchase and deployment, training programs, process and procedure changes, and accomplishment of the items ' included in the preliminary TEAM Improvement Program task lists. These estimated costs and benefits will be further refined during the recommended detailed ' implementation planning phase. Based on the above factors and assuming worst-case costs, the Benefit Cost Analysis results are: 1 ■ 25-year benefit cost ratio is expected to be approximately 9:1 ■ Total Life Cycle benefit cost ratio is expected to be in the 15:1 to 20:1 range, depending on the actual replacement value of the system 1 Clearly, there are strong financial reasons for implementing an OCSD TEAM Program. There are other important reasons that are briefly summarized below. Level of Service Sustainability ' OCSD services are highly infrastructure dependent. Improved management of OCSD's ' infrastructure assets will result in fewer failures, and will ensure that services are delivered on a sustained basis. The best practices based components of the TEAM Program will enhance levels of service by decreasing critical failures, (through use of failure mode analysis, and risk-consequence processes, and expanded condition assessment), and ensuring that appropriate reinvestment strategies are planned, based on accurate infrastructure renewal forecasting tools. It will also ensure that the impacts of financial decisions on level of service and long-term sustainability are clearly understood through TEAM modeling and reporting processes. PARSONS aD ES-12 1 1 i f�sset /ffaaaY,ehfe11`t Y(,-a&g/C, Plaa 1 1 Environmental 1 Environmental protection is a key element of OCSD's overall mission. Implementing TEAM Program measures that include failure mode and criticality analysis, prioritized 1 capital renewal and replacement, and reliability centered maintenance are elements of the TEAM Program that help assure that OCSD's environmental protection mission is met. I The condition assessment monitoring and evaluation aspects of the TEAM Program will contribute to the proper operations of OCSD's system of infrastructure. Having high confidence level processes, procedures, information, data, and tools in place to manage OCSD's assets in accordance with best appropriate practices will enhance OCSD's 1 ability to continue meeting its environmental compliance goals, even as the District's infrastructure continues to age. I How Do We Move Ahead? 1 The key steps necessary to move ahead with the TEAM Program are: 1 ■ Approve this AM Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis Report, and its 1 recommendations. • Proceed with Phase 2,Tactical Work Plan Development. 1 Phase 2 would perform detailed implementation planning necessary to determine 1 the specific actions, resources, schedule, and costs for the recommended TEAM Program improvement components, and to ensure efficient and effective 1 implementation occurs with minimal disruption to the organization. This planning process will require 12-18 months of work to complete. 1 • Proceed with "Quick Start"planning and implementation. 1 This step involves the expedited, high priority planning and implementation of the "quick stall' items described in the Strategic Framework and Business Case 1 (Section 4). The four identified quick start items are expected to produce significant short-term results.The items are: 1 • Capital Expenditure Evaluation I • Asset Hierarchy and Processes • CMMS Replacement and Systems Interconnectivity I PARSONS( ES-13 �� I I asset /ffavyemerrt Yt,-ate,aie P�aa � I • Organizational Structureand Development These four items should be expedited and should immediately proceed to implementation following the planning of each item. • Proceed with 3-year target implementation. This step is the actual implementation of the selected TEAM Program improvement components targeted for the 3-year planning horizon, shown in the Appendix. • Proceed with Best Appropriate Practices target implementation. This step is the actual implementation of the selected TEAM Program improvement components identified for the Best Appropriate Practices (4-10 year)planning horizon,shown in the Appendix. • Continuous monitoring and improvement. Monitor TEAM Program progress and continuously make improvements to it on a cost benefit basis. Exhibit ES-2 shows how confidence levels increase over time as best practices targets are achieved. This Program is considered dynamic, rather than static,and will be subject to continuous improvement. I I I I I I 1 I I I PAPSONSaD ES-14 I I I I Affee Naaa,4,enreKt Al-a&alr, PlaK 1 EXHIBIT ES-2. CONCEPT OF CONTINUOUS ASSET MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1 Target Level Best of AM Practices Appropriate (BAP) AM Practices <-- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - -- -- - - -- -- - ---- 1 (BAP) 1 1 Quality of 1 AM Practices 3-Year Target <- -- --- -- - - - -- Progress of "Confidence Level" AM Improvement 1 Program Current Status of <" " ' AM Practices I I 1 2002 3-Years Lessthan 10 Years 1 TIME 1 This illustrates horn OCSD would progress f on,its current 1 level of practices to Beet Appropriate Practire.s(BAP). BAP rngv not in all cases equal current world's hest pra<'lices. 1 1 1 I PA1R50N5l- ES-15 I i i � asset /�a7a�eHreKt �'tr�ateoic P14 � 1 How Do We Build Knowledge and Consensus for Asset Management in Our Organization? Knowledge and support for asset management within OCSD were furthered considerably I during the strategic planning project through: • Extensive training sessions and comprehensive manuals that focused on advanced AM practices and processes Dialogue with highly experienced AM practitioners • Credible,comprehensive,and objective assessments I • Collaborative, inclusive,and open workshops Extensive and open dialogue between Parsons/GHD Team and OCSD staff on 1 every aspect of the project ■ Consensus-based decision making and participatory processes in the post assessment segments of the project I ■ Collaborative development of implementation strategies that appropriately address OCSD staff and management consensus As the TEAM Program progresses, it is vital that knowledge building continues to enable OCSD staff to be ready to utilize AM improvement components when implemented. The level of AM knowledge is critical to the success of organizational changes as OCSD I moves toward an asset-centered organization. I What are the Conclusions and Recommendations? Summary of Conclusions f • The DART and Engineering Reinvention initiatives represent a significant improvement and contribution to the overall OCSD AM practices. These ' initiatives lifted the confidence level score 20% (from 47% in 1996 to 68% in 2002). • In conducting the interview and workshop programs, the Parsnns/GHD Team was impressed by the quality of staff throughout the organization. They were PARSONS ES-16 1 1 1 asset /�aaa�e�fe7t r�'twate�ic �eaa 1MW receptive and enthusiastic about the new approaches being raised and debated in 1 workshops. The comprehensive and objective assessment confirmed that there are significant gaps between current OCSD asset management processes and recognized best practices,even with the measured gains resulting from the DART Program. • The assessment process findings indicate that OCSD already does a good job in 1 many areas that were assessed. However, there are several areas of advanced I asset management that are new to virtually all U.S. utilities that need to be deployed at OCSD in order to close the gap between current and best practices at I appropriate levels. The proposed confidence level targets established for the 3-year and Best Appropriate Practices planning horizons will substantially and aggressively enhance OCSD's asset management practices, and will produce significant 1 financial, level of service sustainability and environmental benefits. 1 • The packages of TEAM Program improvement components prescribed to close the gap between current and best appropriate practices for the 3-year and Best Appropriate Practices planning periods were derived from the best practices based assessment.The collaboratively set confidence level targets are appropriate 1 as a starting point for the recommended implementation planning phase. I • The proposed TEAM Program Charter is appropriate and necessary to provide the strategic framework needed to provide uniform organization-wide shared I vision,guidance,clarity,and strategic direction. ■ The proposed implementation strategies contained in the TEAM Program Charter are appropriate and necessary to ensure efficient and effective development and 1 deployment of the TEAM Program. The forecasted financial, level of service sustainability, and environment benefits 1 that comprise the business case clearly indicates that OCSD should move forward with the TEAM Program. ■ The proposed "quick start" items identified in the business case can deliver. I significant and important benefits early in the TEAM Program, and should be expedited. PARSONS ES-17 t Affect /faa dre e Se,-a is Peal I Recommendations • Accept and approve the Asset Management Strategic Plan and Framework Analysis Report. • Accept and approve the TEAM Program Charter. ■ Proceed with the Phase 2, Tactical Work Plan Development, which includes "Quick Stan" initiatives. PAFtSONSr ES-18 11ii0iill ar Or 7 PARSON51 GHO