The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-10-23 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT October 17, 2002 eon„ NOTICE OF MEETING (71419e2-2411 1714)9e2�55 BOARD OF DIRECTORS '"""' .ad.... ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT engine address: PO Po nt nV¢le8y'2 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2002 — 7:00 P.M. 9272E-8127 carrot edd,mcr: 19e44 Ellis Av.nu. Pountem Valley C DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 92709-7018 10844 Ellis Avenue Member Fountain Valley, California 92708 A,...es • The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Clues District will be held at the above location, time and date. An.h.im Brae Buena Park Lypress Foumaln Valley Fullerton cameo crag. Bo rd Secretpn Huntington Beech - Irvine La Hebre La Pelme Lae Ahr.nm Nanplln Beech grange Mae." Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Sense Are Seal Beach Stenron Tustin Ville Park Vern. bode OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday, November 6,2002 at 5:00 p.m. Count, or Orange SPECIAL STEERING COMMITTEE -Thursday, November 7, 2002 at 3:00 p.m. units" Districts PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday, November 7, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. costa Mesa udnsy on, JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Water Districts SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE -To Be Determined Irvine Ranch FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday, November 13, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday, November 20, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. AD HOC COMMITTEE re URBAN RUNOFF -Thursday, November 21, 2002 at 4:00 p.m. To maintain"rid-class leadership in nestewater end water resource menagemenc. n a • bo BOARD MEETING DATES *November 20, 2002 •December 18, 2002 January 22, 2003 February 26, 2003 March 26, 2003 Apri123, 2003 May 28, 2003 June 25, 2003 *July 16, 2003 August 27, 2003 September 24, 2003 October 22, 2003 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month G.Xwp.dta\atlmin\BSV,genda\2002 Meeting NofimWN10.2.Am 9� 1 O a q p October 23,2002 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ghirelli Director of T nical Services SUBJECT: Review of Ocean Discharge Permit Renewal Application Attached to this memo is the draft ocean discharge permit renewal application. Volume 1 is provided in a hard copy, and the appendices(along with Volume 1)are provided in electronic format on a compact disc. Volume 1 contains the following documents: 1. Letter of Transmittal (containing an overview of the entire package) 2. Official Permit Renewal Forms 3. Clean Water Act Section 403(c) Response—Ocean Discharge Criteria 4. Antidegradation Analysis Staff is requesting that the Board of Directors review the application to make sure it accurately reflects your intent to expeditiously achieve secondary treatment and abandon the Clean Water Act Section 301(h)modified permit. This is a working draft. Some technical information and final editing must occur before the application is completed. This is especially true for the appendices which require the most-up-to date technical information for the regulators to use in drafting the next permit. Based on comments received from you over the next two weeks,staff will proceed to prepare the final permit application for public review and consideration at the November 20 Board of Directors meeting. Here is the schedule for the permit application review, approval and submission process: 1. October 23, 2002—Board of Directors receives draft application 2. November 7, 2002—Comments on draft are due to staff 3. November 13,2002—Final application mailed in agenda package for November 20 Board of Directors meeting (available for public review) 4. November 20, 2002—Board of Directors approves final application 5. December 2,2002—Final application submitted to EPA and RWOCB Please submit Your comments on the draft to staff by November 7. 2002 as indicated on the draft permit application cover page. RPG:rm 10-23-02 tlaR permit cover memo RPG Attachments CONTENTS VOLUME 1-1 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL VOLUME 1-2 PERMIT APPLICATIONS GENERAL INFORMATION: CONSOLIDATED PERMITS PROGRAM NPDES FORM 2A SWRCB WDR FORM 200 VOLUME 1-3 OCEAN DISCHARGE CRITERIA, RESPONSE TO CWA 403(C) VOLUME 1-4 ANTIDEGRADATION ANALYSIS APPENDICES APPENDIX A GENERAL INFORMATION, INTERIM COMPLIANCE,AND BENEFICIAL USE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX B DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES AND OCEAN OUTFALL APPENDIX C DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED NEW TREATMENT FACILITIES PLANNED FOR CONSTRUCTION DURING NEXT FIVE YEARS APPENDIX D RECEIVING WATER MONITORING D.1 COASTAL OCEANOGRAPHY D.2 PLUME DYNAMICS D.3 WATER QUALITY D.4 PLUME INDICATORS D.5 SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY D.6 PLANKTON D.7 INFAUNAL COMMUNITY D.8 SEDIMENT QUALITY RELATIONSHIPS D.9 FISH AND MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY D.10 FISH TISSUE BIOACCUMULATION D.11 FISH HEALTH D.12 BIRDS, MAMMALS, AND ENDANGERED SPECIES APPENDIX E BENEFICIAL USE ASSESSMENT APPENDIX F EXISTING PERMIT AND MONITORING LANGUAGE APPENDIX G PROPOSED PERMIT AND MONITORING LANGUAGE APPENDIX H TOXIC POLLUTANT CONTROL PROGRAM APPENDIX J ANALYSIS OF AMMONIA DATA APPENDIX K STAFF REPORT ON STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE AND DECISION APPENDIX L CALIFORNIA OCEAN PLAN CONTENTS APPENDIX M INITIAL DILUTION APPENDIX N GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM PROGRAM APPENDIX O POSEIDON/AES SEAWATER DESALINATION WATER QUALITY STUDIES IN HUNTINGTON BEACH APPENDIX P EFFLUENT TRADING POLICIES APPENDIX 0 OPERATIONAL PLAN APPENDIX R ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP APPENDIX S SHORT TERM OCEAN OUTFALL-BACTERIA REDUCTION PLAN DRAFT OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT NPDES PERMIT #CA0110604 WDR Order #98-5 For ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS October 23, 2002 Final Approval Scheduled for November 20, 2002 With Submittal To U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board on December 2, 2002 Provide comments to staff by November 7, 2002 as follows: James Colston 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 593-7458 FAX (714) 962-2591 jcolston(a)ocsd.com DRAFT December 2, 2002 Wayne Nastri Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Gerard Thibeault Executive Director CRWQCB, Santa Ana Region 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Riverside, CA 92501-3339 SUBJECT: Submittal and Executive Summary of Application for the NPDES Permit REFERENCE: Existing Permit No. CA0110604 This application reflects the decision of our Board of Directors to withdraw its 301(h)waiver and achieve the secondary treatment standard at the earliest possible date. The application is drafted in accordance with the directives contained in Resolution 02-14 adopted by the OCSD Board of Directors: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING THE POLICY FOR LEVEL OF TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE OCEAN BE IT RESOLVED by the Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors that it is the District's policy to treat all wastewater discharges into the ocean to secondary treatment standards,thereby providing for continued public safety, marine ecosystem protection and water reclamation opportunities. NOW,THEREFORE,the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE,AND ORDER: Section 1: District staff is directed to immediately proceed with the planning, design,and implementation of treatment methods that will allow the agency to meet Federal Clean Water Act secondary treatment standards. Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 2 of 15 December 2, 2002 Section2: District staff shall prepare and adopt a plan of work for facilities to meet secondary treatment standards, and submit the necessary documentation to EPA and the State of California,with the expressed purpose of eliminating a waiver under Section 301(h)of the Federal Clean Water Act. Section 3: District staff is directed to expeditiously negotiate peril terms and conditions that will accomplish the inter-related goals of achieving secondary treatment standards,eliminating the need for a Section 301(h)Clean Water Act pe nit, and minimizing the risk of enforcement liability during the transition period from the present effluent standards to secondary treatment standards. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 17,2002. Submitted herewith are the original and one copy of the Orange County Sanitation District's application for renewal of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit The District will no longer operate under the provisions of Section 301(h)of the Clean Water Act and will voluntarily move to operate under the provisions of existing federal regulations for secondary treatment and the California Ocean Plan. An electronic copy with all documents in portable document format (PDF) is included for your convenience. This action signals a monumental change in our NPDES permit as directed by our Board of Directors on July 17, 2002 when they voted 13 to 12 to move expeditiously to meet the secondary treatment standard. As the largest holder of a 301(h) permit, this action triggers a new direction for OCSD. We are the first large agency to electively forego the renewal of a waiver from secondary treatment. This major change in operating philosophy will require cooperation from regulators and the public as we move forward to negotiate the terms and conditions of the next permit. We understand that the regulators seek to work with OCSD in a cooperative, non-punitive manner. Our discussions to-date have occurred in that spirit of cooperation and we look forward to successfully completing the negotiations in the near future. The renewal application has been completed and submitted by the statutory deadline of December 8, 2002, 180 days in advance of the expiration of our current permit. Our staff and consultants will be available to assist in the review process, and we will provide a timely response to any supplemental information requests from your staff. We respectfully urge EPA and the Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 3 of 15 December 2, 2002 California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB), to maintain close contact with our staff throughout your review so that we can answer questions that arise during the course of your evaluation. We hope that the renewal application can be expeditiously reviewed by EPA and the RWQCB and that a new NPDES Permit renewal containing interim limits that can be achieved during the transition period as the District plans, designs, constructs and commissions additional secondary treatment facilities to meet the 30 mg/L and 85% removal standards for both biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids. SUMMARY This submittal letter serves a dual purpose. It formally transmits our application to EPA Region 9, the RWQCB, and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). This letter also provides you with an Executive Summary of the application. The application seeks to provide the regulatory agencies with complete information sufficient to issue the permit on its technical merits. COMMITMENT TO WASTEWATER AND WATERSHED EXCELLENCE In response to the decision by OCSD's Board of Directors to upgrade the level of wastewater treatment and meet the secondary treatment standard,the staff has committed to maintain its high level of excellence in wastewater treatment and watershed protection throughout the process. This will include optimizing the existing wastewater treatment facilities to achieve significantly higher biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids removal during the interim period. This treatment ramp-up phase is discussed in detail in the Operational Plan found in Appendix Q. The District is further committed to maintain its high rate of compliance with all state and federal laws and regulations controlling wastewater treatment discharges including the industrial pretreatment program, effluent limits, and the prevention and response to sanitary sewer overflows. Finally, OCSD remains committed to its watershed and water reclamation activities, most notably the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS). The GW RS project is scheduled to come online near the end of the peril period, Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 4 of 15 December 2, 2002 and more details about the project are found in Appendix O. OCSD will continue its involvement in numerous other watershed activities. One important new activity is the urban runoff program designed to prevent pathogen-laden dry-weather urban runoff flows from reaching high-use recreational waters. This program and others are discussed in detail in Appendix R. LEGACY OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT 301(h) WAIVER PROGRAM Clean Water Act Historical Perspective In 1972, the U. S. Congress amended the Federal Water Pollution Control Act requiring all publicly owned treatment works (POTWs)to achieve, by July 1, 1977, secondary treatment as defined by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This landmark legislation, known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), included many other provisions that were aimed at providing a national baseline for states to follow in regulating wastewater discharges. These provisions included a national permitting requirement (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, NPDES program) that can be administered by individual states with oversight by EPA, a national industrial pretreatment program, and an enforcement scheme containing stringent fines for violations. Secondary Treatment Defined In 1973, EPA defined secondary treatment in terms of four parameters - biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), suspended solids (TSS), pH, and fecal coliform bacteria. EPA established minimum removal requirements of 85% for both BOD and TSS with an effluent quality of 30 milligrams per Ifter(mg/L) or better on a monthly average (the 30/30 rule) in the final effluent to be discharged. (Note: exceptions would be granted for certain dischargers who had oxidation ponds or trickling filters to meet a minimum of 45 mg/L for BOD and TSS). Later that year, the fecal coliform bacteria criterion was deleted from the standard. Wayne Nestri Gerard Thibeault Page 5 of 15 December 2, 2002 Ocean Dischargers Ask for Exceptions Based on Water Quality Justification With the enactment of the CWA and requirement for secondary treatment, a number of municipalities, primarily from the West Coast, argued before both the Congress and EPA that secondary treatment of municipal estuarine and ocean discharges is not necessary to protect the marine environment or to assure the attainment and maintenance of water quality or beneficial uses in ocean waters. The argument was based on the pollutant parameters being used to define secondary treatment (BOD and TSS). These parameters are important for freshwater ecology where the discharge of oxygen-demanding wastes and sedimentation of suspended solids degrades the quality of enclosed water bodies or rivers which receive excessive waste loads. In estuaries and the ocean, organics and fine solids are rapidly assimilated and dispersed by strong currents and the much greater assimilative capacity. The agencies successfully argued that, where local conditions existed to provide for adequate assimilation of wastewater discharged from ouffalls, secondary treatment was not needed and should be exempted from the Act on a site-speck basis. As a result of evidence and testimony presented before Congress, the CWA was amended in 1977, adding section 301(h), which provides that "the Administrator of EPA, upon application by a POTW and with the concurrence of the State, may issue an NPDES permit which modifies EPA's secondary treatment requirements H the applicant: (1) discharges into certain ocean and estuarine waters; and (2) demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the administrator, that the modification will not result in any increase in the discharge of toxic pollutants or otherwise impair the integrity of the receiving waters:" Testimony to Congress included scientists from Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California and numerous other experts who had been studying wastewater discharge effects on the ocean. Also, the largest contingent of POTWs seeking the legislative relief were from California which had already adopted a comprehensive state regulatory program, The Water Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 6 of 15 December 2, 2002 Pollution Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California (California Ocean Plan). The California Ocean Plan regulated toxic constituents in wastewater rather than the effluent concentrations of organic nutrients in wastewater(BOD) by established receiving water objectives for maintaining ambient levels of dissolved oxygen. Suspended solids requirements were established at a 75% removal rate or that which could be achieved by advanced primary treatment (versus the 85% removal required by EPA). California's legislation and research into water quality protection was a key factor in helping Congress decide to enact Section 301(h)of the Clean Water Act in 1977. The congressional amendment was enacted after an evaluation of the merits requiring secondary treatment for ocean dischargers when the circumstances of discharge provided sufficient distance, depth, and dilution to protect the environment with primary, chemically-enhanced primary treatment or a blend of primary and secondary treatment. One-Time Application for 208 Dischargers Nationwide EPA finalized the rules and regulations for applying for a 301(h)-modfied NPDES permit in1979 and allowed a one-time application for a site-specific permit based on local environmental conditions for dischargers which were not already providing secondary treatment. Each POTW which applied had to prepare a comprehensive application containing speck information responding to a detailed set of criteria and questions published in the Federal Register. By the application filing deadline in the fall of 1979, 208 applications were received by EPA. California had the most applicants with 69, of which 45 came from dischargers within the San Francisco Bay estuary. The Orange County Sanitation District was among those agencies originally applying as did most of the ocean dischargers who were providing less-than secondary treatment and were meeting the requirements of the COP. intensive Technical Review Narrows the Field of Applicants An intensive technical review of the original applications was initiated by EPA with the assistance of contract consultants with expertise in various aspects of marine science (oceanography, biology, hydraulic modeling, fisheries, etc.). Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 7 of 15 December 2, 2002 The review process, record of decision, public noticing and subsequent public hearings (for those applicants who received Tentative Approval)took years. Of the original applicants, only a handful (now numbering 37)were eventually granted 301(h)-modified permits which are still being maintained. Of the 208 applications that EPA received, some 40 were revised and resubmitted. After review, two-thirds of the applications were denied. Some of these denied were revised and resubmitted. Final decisions resulted in the approval of less than fifty of the original applications. Some 65 applications were voluntarily withdrawn. Orange County Sanitation District 301(h)-modified NPDES Permit History OCSD was among those original applications which received final approval and were issued permits. OCSD (previously operating as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County) received its first 301(h)waiver permit in 1985. This original permit was subsequently renewed (based on a 1989 renewal application) in 1998 for the statutory five year period. Under the provisions of this permit, an intensive ocean monitoring program is conducted along with monitoring of influent and effluent for toxic and conventional pollutants. Provisions of the permit have required the District to conduct a non- industrial source control program and a more intensive industrial pre-treatment program to make sure toxic pollutant levels in the effluent meet removal rates equivalent to secondary treatment. Year2003 Renewal Process As part of the decision whether to file for renewal of Its 301(h) modified NPDES permit, the District conducted an update to its 1999 Strategic Plan and Program Environmental Impact Report which reviewed various treatment options, their costs, and environmental impacts. An intensive public outreach program was included in this effort. In the end, the Board of Directors voted to move expeditiously to meet the federal secondary treatment standard and end participation in the 301(h)waiver program. However, as indicated in the Strategic Plan Update, it was anticipated that achieving full secondary standards could take as long as 11 years for planning, design, construction, and start-up operations. Meanwhile, staff has initiated a program to optimize the performance of existing facilities to achieve the highest quality effluent quality in the interim. Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 8 of 15 December 2, 2002 Legal Dilemma Faced by OCSD At the time 301(h) regulations were developed, there was no provision for positive incentives in the NPDES permitting program to encourage agencies to voluntarily decide to give up a waiver permit and move to the secondary treatment standard. Once out from under the shield of that provision of the CWA, non-compliance with the provisions of secondary treatment becomes automatic under a new permit, and the situation requires an interim compliance mechanism to assure continued compliance. EXISTING DISCHARGE—THIS APPLICATION Our application for a new NPDES permit is comprehensive in nature. Coincident with the thirtieth anniversary of the Clean Water Act, OCSD is electing to move toward the 30/30 standard. As we embark on a major capital improvement program to upgrade to the higher level of treatment interim effluent permit limits must be developed. We have demonstrated our treatment facilities capabilities in an Interim Operational Plan (Appendix Q)that covers the next five years. During this period, we will be upgrading some existing secondary treatment facilities, and this will impact our effluent quality. In addition, we are partners in a major regional wastewater reclamation project with the Orange County Water District known as the Groundwater Replenishment System. This $470 million project is now in design, and if it moves ahead on schedule, is scheduled to be online by 2007. At that time, up to 100 million gallons a day of secondary effluent will be diverted for advanced treatment. Part of the process will be reverse osmosis treatment that will generate concentrates which will be high in salts and ammonia-nitrogen. This process stream may be suitable for direct blending with the final effluent for ocean disposal. We will be seeking consideration in our permit for accommodation of this project in our new NPDES Permit. Our comprehensive permit application consists of two volumes. Volume 1 is the basic application using the standard NPDES fortes and a demonstration of compliance with the requirements of Section 403(c)of the Clean Water Act. We have also provided an Antidegradation Analysis which may be helpful to the two regulatory agencies involved in demonstrating that our proposed discharge will be protective of beneficial uses and water quality. Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 9 of 15 December 2, 2002 Volume 2 contains supporting information in 18 Appendices designated as A through S. Appendix A contains supporting information on compliance and beneficial use protection that is consistent with what has historically been provided to support our NPDES permit application. This information provides some historical perspective during the transition period as we move to 30/30 standards. Appendix B describes our existing treatment facilities and ocean disposal facilities, while Appendix C describes what facility improvements and operational plans we will be undertaking in the next five years to move to 30/30 standards. Appendix D provides a comprehensive overview of our receiving water monitoring results during the current NPDES permit (issued in 1998). This also includes information on marine mammals, birds, and endangered species which are not included in our monitoring program but of importance to our own water quality protection goals. Appendix E consists of a Beneficial Use Assessment which provides quantification of the beneficial uses identified in our present permit and provides some very interesting data on the economic value of offshore fisheries, the participation in various activities dependent upon the marine environment, and an assessment of how beneficial uses are being protected. Our staff has spent a great deal of effort reviewing the existing NPDES permit and what they have learned during the past four years implementing its provisions. Based on these insights and experience, we have proposed revisions for the next permit which we believe are in the public interest and make more sense in assuring smooth implementation of the next permit. These revisions are shown in a mark-up of the existing permit in Appendix G. The existing permit, including the recent modifications associated with the District's disinfection program, and monitoring program have been included for reference as Appendix F. Toxic pollutant reduction has been a hallmark of the District's wastewater management program, and Appendix (H) highlights the quality of our effluent and describes our award-winning source control program. Effluent toxicity and ammonia management are of increasing interest to our management efforts as concentrations have increased during the current drought and our treatment facilities are optimized. Our efforts to identify Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 10 of 15 December 2, 2002 solutions to managing nitrogen and minimizing toxicity are described in Appendix J. Prior to making its landmark decision in July, the District undertook a public outreach and planning update program to update its 1999 Strategic Plan. This effort evaluated alternatives for treatment, updated their environmental impacts and costs and solicited community input on what direction our agency should take in the future. These efforts are summarized in the comprehensive staff report to our Board of Directors which is presented as Appendix K. The California Ocean Plan, the State's water quality management plan which sets baseline standards for all ocean discharges, is contained in Appendix L. The amount of dilution provided for our treated effluent is an important consideration in assuring that water quality standards are met and that beneficial uses are protected. Also, the determination of initial dilution is important to the implementation of the California Ocean Plan water quality standards. Appendix M contains a detailed analysis of initial dilution calculations based on our ocean monitoring data and historical and projected flows. There are several important water supply projects under development in our service area in which the District is a partner or that may have an impact on the District's operations. Of key importance is the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS), our partnership reclamation project discussed previously. More details on this $427 million dollar project are described in Appendix N. Of note are the interdependencies of the District's operations (providing high quality secondary effluent for advanced treatment and managing backwash from microfiltration facilities and concentrates from reverse osmosis treatment) and the Orange County Water District's operation of the advanced treatment facilities on their adjoining property. Some regulatory considerations for this integrated operation will be needed as we proceed toward implementation of this unprecedented project to make Orange County less dependent upon imported water. The second project of potential importance and consideration is a proposed seawater desalination facility proposed at the AES power plant in Huntington Beach by Poseidon Resources. The District is aware of claims that the quality of the source water (once-through cooling water) for this potential drinking water supply is adversely affected by the discharge from the District's ocean Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page11 of 15 December 2, 2002 outfall. We believe that this is no longer an issue with the addition of disinfection facilities to the District's treatment train. Oceanographic and water quality studies performed by the project proponents and the District indicate there is no impact from our discharge. More information on this project is provided in Appendix 0. Appendix P contains information on EPA's effluent trading policies. We present this information in the hope that the permit will provide effluent quality credits in recognition of the positive impacts associated with our Environmental Stewardship programs (described in Appendix Q). It is possible that permit compliance issues may arise during the term of this permit that might be affected by our handling of other waste streams that are diverted and treated from other locations in the watershed of the Santa Ana River. Our Operational Plan, developed in response to our Board's July 17, 2002 mandate to improve treatment as expeditiously as possible is presented in Appendix Q. This Plan details the actions that the District is taking in the short- term to ramp up our existing treatment facilities and optimize their performance until we construct new facilities to achieve 30/30 standards. The focus of this Plan covers the next five years (new permit period). The Plan includes an estimate of our estimated effluent quality over time as various facility changes occur and the GW RS project becomes operational in late 2007. Also, we have proposed in the Plan (Table 3 of Appendix Q) interim effluent limitations for consideration in the drafting of a new permit. OCSD has demonstrated leadership with our Environmental Stewardship program which embodies a diverse group of water quality protection programs. These various programs include sponsorship of water conservation programs (toilet and showerhead retrofitting) to reduce our flows and save energy; cooperative programs with our member agencies to fund projects to reduce infiltration and inflow, peak wet weather flows, and defer the need for a new ocean outfall and new facilities; the dairy washwater pilot project that helps to prevent these high-strength wastes from entering the Santa Ana River, our biosolids management program and new Environmental Management System; and finally, our urban runoff management program to help protect coastal water quality. These programs are described in Appendix R. Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 12 of 15 December 2, 2002 Appendix S contains a copy of the Short-tens Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Plan. This plan was provided to the regulators prior to the adoption of the modified ocean discharge permit on July 19, 2002, and it is included for reference purposes. THE FUTURE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT AT OCSD Updated Capital Improvement Program -Alternative C (Full Secondary) The 2002 Strategic Plan Update evaluated four alternatives for treatment. Two of these were for levels of treatment equivalent to secondary treatment (Alternatives C and D). Alternative C represents wastewater treatment processes to produce an outfall effluent quality that meets secondary treatment standards of 30 mg/L BOD and 30 mg/L TSS. Alternative D was based on the use of microfiltration which cannot achieve the 30 mg/L BOD without additional biological treatment which increases the costs above those of conventional secondary treatment. However, it has the capability of significantly reducing pathogens and thus has lower costs for pathogen reduction than conventional treatment. In its July 17, 2002 decision, the Board of Directors left the question of the appropriate technology to meet the secondary treatment standard open to a future decision based on continuing planning and research now underway. To meet projected treatment needs based on the flows forecast in the Updated Capital Improvement Program (UCIP), new grit chambers, primary clarifiers, aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, dissolved air floatation (DAF)tanks, digesters, holding tanks, belt filter presses, cake storage facilities and pathogen reduction facilities are needed at both treatment plants. Details on the specific facilities mentioned are presented in Appendix C. Microfiltration Research The District is continuing to evaluate an alternative means of treating wastewater to achieve 30/30 standards. This alternative treatment technology is microfiltration. A demonstration project has been in operation at Plant No. 2 to demonstrate the effectiveness of this technology. Its main advantage is the high solids and bacterial removals achieved. If the removals of BOD and solids backwash handling can be resolved, this technology may be a far more environmentally beneficial technology compared to conventional activated Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Pagel of 15 December 2, 2002 sludge technologies. To further explore this option, the Board of Directors recently approved over$1 million in additional funding for verifying the effectiveness of this technology and getting more detailed information that could be used for design purposes. Ongoing research will not delay projects necessary to achieve the secondary treatment standard. Planning for Secondary Treatment There are several factors that have led the District to an initial estimate of 11-years for implementation of full secondary treatment standards. In addition to the time required for design and construction of additional secondary treatment capacity, the District must undertake more detailed planning and scheduling to coordinate secondary treatment expansion with future and on- going projects. Other factors are discussed below. OCSD Must Maintain its Current Operations and Level of Service During Construction. The treatment plants are currently undergoing significant rehabilitation. Of the $1.9 billion proposed 20-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), only 25% is for additional capacity to handle increased sewage flows. The remainder is for rehabilitation and improved treatment of existing facilities. Major plant projects that are presently under construction or in design, will occupy nearly all the open space at our two treatment plant sites through 2006 for contractor staging, storage, and work areas. These projects do not include projects to increase the Districts secondary treatment capacity. Maintaining our operations while major construction is underway is challenging as tie-ins are made and flows must be lowered to accommodate these tie-ins. Detailed Planning for Expansion of Secondary Treatment Capacity Requires Answering Some Big Questions Prior to Designing and Constructing Additional Secondary Treatment Facilities Our staff and consultants are addressing some of the major questions in the near future. These include: - What impacts will new wastewater programs such as future water reclamation and urban runoff diversions have on secondary treatment technology to be used? Wayne Nestri Gerard Thibeault Page 14 of 15 December 2, 2002 - How will OCSD meet new permit requirements such as effluent toxicity? Also, as discussed above, alternative technologies such as Microfiltration need further research for incorporation into secondary treatment expansion plans. OCSD Needs to Evaluate its Infrastructure to Understand All of the Improvements Necessary to Support Full Secondary Treatment Improvements to plant systems such as electric power generation and distribution, odor control, solids handling, and automation systems must be planned and designed to accommodate full secondary treatment. The Current Capital Improvement Program is Being Reorganized to Allow Efficient Use of Existing OCSD Resources We must maximize the use of existing District resources (facilities, personnel, infrastructure, etc.), existing District lands, and existing and proposed funding if we are to be efficient in our efforts to move to a higher level of treatment. We also must minimize problems due to the anticipated number of construction contractors on-site at any one time, and potential conflicts with existing levels of sewerage service. The District's Engineering Department has reorganized and has brought a Program Management Consultant (IPMC, a joint venture of CH2MHill and Parsons) on-board for a five-year initial contract for$15 million. The new organization and additional consultant resources will allow the District to optimize our planning and delivery and will provide manpower to plan and execute the many projects necessary for full secondary treatment expansion. With the Board's decision to move this agency to a higher level of treatment, the Engineering Department is beginning a comprehensive planning effort to assess and revise our existing Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The assessment will consist of evaluating each existing project's scope, schedule, budget, resource needs, and priority and to then include any new projects that are identified to get us to that higher level of treatment. The result, in the spring of 2003, will be a refined CIP that will become both the basis of our negotiations with the regulators regarding our commitment to compliance with Wayne Nastri Gerard Thibeault Page 15 of 15 December 2, 2002 the new standards, as well as the detailed plan for the Engineering Department's work for the next decade or so. During the next few months, we will be finalizing our assessment process and will be supplementing our permit application with the final Plan developed during the process. This may result in some modifications to our application as we move forward and fine-tune our long-term Capital Improvement Plan and Operational Plan. CLOSING This application was developed to provide the EPA and RWQCB with comprehensive information necessary to renew OCSD's wastewater treatment permit. We are ready to provide additional information, as necessary, for you to complete the renewal process. We will be glad to meet with you to discuss the particulars of the tentative permit and monitoring program. Traditionally, OCSD, EPA, the RWQCB, and interested members of the public have worked together to develop reasonable and acceptable permit and monitoring terms and conditions. We renew our commitment to that process, and we look forward to continuing our history of cooperation. Please contact Robert Ghirelli or Jim Colston from our staff at (714) 593-7400 and (714) 593-7458, respectively. Blake P. Anderson General Manager Shirley McCracken Board of Directors, Chair BPA:SM:JC:wh G1wp.dMMSIS20'GENERAL DATA%56088000C_NPDES Pe,milApPlkallonDrall L8 12-2-02.doC VOLUME 1-2 PERMIT APPLICATIONS "arms peo,.1 olitalru..in.uN O sae only DRAFT Ifill—in nor"r tpY.d for stile InN La, 12 tn"acrrnAg Form ApWovad. OMB No.2040-0088. FORM ws..NONON...T.,IN.I.C1......e.T 1.EPA I.D.NUMBER 1 \/Cp/� GENERAL INFORMATION CPA cwwimrwhminppt F D GENERAL (Reed the .0"Frof egburfianr^Mfan le"i.C.) na L'.atnV TOPIC L \MO P it a Permitted label Me ban provided, affix E A 1`D. 1, in In. designated roan ReY ex in.inlum- .t en anfopY, It any of It 4 mcdnen, .. 1e. through It wed enter the correct dine in the pproprNW fill—In er. blow. Alto,it any OI In. n disoriented ate I. stirs. (,he ana to Me FACILITY \\\ me, .1 Mr IW/ pace lion Me mfomafmn V' MA1 Ix A Is p EASE PL C L 8 IN TR IS SPAC mat should AOAeafl, pb.n proyki. it In In. prop, fit". ".DI blow. If tha lint i{ nmplate am Correct. You n.ed not mmples. Items I, 111, V, am VI feracepr VI-0 wnidr meal AN e.PlelM np•dleY). Complete an FACI}}..1TY Items if m teba haeLbnn ptovitla. Rotor led VI.LOCATIO the instructions file de011ed it.. GmHp truer and for the loold vinlyNintig., under which this data IL FOLLUTPNT CXARACTERISTICb INSTRUCTIONS: Complete A through J to determine whether You head to submit any permit Implication forms to the EPA.If YOU answer"Yoe"to any questions,You must submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the parenthesis following the question.Mark"X"In the Pox in the third Column If the supplemental form Is mashed. If you..Me "no"to .ch Consist,You need not rubmh any of theP trams.You may answer"no"If your activity I{excluded from peomil requincru ens;see Seaio.C of the i otructions.S.also,Section 0 of the instructions for definitioM of bold—faced terms. umvrc PYpsnonv oNe A. le 'his tech, i i dischaY awned V.mmt w q e• w. S. Does,a will this facility farm"Col htE of prdpPiedl . 'e nicer mu in • diYMrpe to waun PI Me U.S.? R X iglutle x<orN.mmed anima i.diq op".Uin`W: R IFORM2A) ,.ask i el.el aiduabn facility whim muh.,I,, dicbrMm waters of she U.S.?IFORM281 a' . C. a 1 n i ee IIY w LVnanlY I!{V O In Nc irpM {This a popOe c11tY O e, to when PI the U.S.other than thou in dcnbed in R In A i1 B aDow! whim III aml, i. a d4cEarow m 1 R AIN steci(FORMT 1 wen flh. S? f RM1 ) E. Doe or wd. or, lie lily lani or.. or culg n, of R F. DO You or will yoU iel.a.1 this facifily musunrla or haeardi .wmx?(FORM 0) municipal effluent blow,the Iowarmn"stratum con. R ahiho, wimm on. quarter mile of ins well bon YM"emund ied...De drinking wheal/FORM 41 snan IIY inv pr ut H. o Ydda Will wet"Or the,suits,whim en b,.u9h,to M.met... YOY inf.et t Inn 1 IrtY fluids 1pLapf'. •• G. Do you or end u er,.N.,as1 D in tonnlLUon wish i.tw000gl i I or gW.I Far ore R' Lit pepeaV.Wth,u guirlm.1 II by tM F.rm R tl 1 O intern fl itl f d 1 enhanced Ov.IY ol, P solutionminim of Co n IF,Iq 91etMnbVYI' .11 I ra I.,or inject fl d, I., intend Of Nouid lion off iI IwI cow"' of IPblh�S an' hydrocarbons?IF ORM 41 FOPM 4l ; a ,'. 1. s this lovelyapap 1 ry W h , Pdir t0 ry rig or In 28 , Ow I g g a I It in Ih NOT f the28 d ,d nY4 11W strongest, M which,nill polentalty emit too n tons and ra n 'u p I fry h_.'JS¢ 04 'goor l any it Pollutant regulated under the R p v bl env WII I I ry d Itdel"aM.C,QjP' CleanAn Act and ay Ile r$e l I d { In A I Ali and IT y fl n or be locatedd:. t- R "Yes i m .1..7 FORM Sl.- "-?tin >; ..:4yyu�;t ..✓ , b.7'Ji OHM313 F Ill.NAME OF FACILITY 1 [xn ORANGE COIINTY SANITATION DISTRICT Aid IV.FACILITY CONTACT ...Thu(Wt.Atk6 T'11aTd)'. [rams Yadei n43 YJ 2 ANDERSON BLAKE GENE A ER 9 6 2 2.4 1 1 V.FACILITY MAILING ADDRESS 0.41.1I T Ce.I.O.adx?. 0 10844 ELLIS AVENUE ..CITY OR TOWN .....T d•."Co.. 1 PO A lf V LLEY CA 92708 Vs. FACILITY LOCATIDN e.iTw C[l.NOVT[ NO.ON OTN[N VLCIIIC 10[NTIeral ' 51 10844 ELLIS AV ......TY . N. ORANGE C.CITY ON TOWN oITATC VCOD. 1Ou 6 FOUNTAIN VALLEY C 92708 — EPA Form 0510-1 (9-90) h CONTINUE ON REVERSE ONTINUEO FROM THE FRONT V I I.atC[ODES pliyip in orOer of peipriryl i[COMO ] DAT w.nw.T bprrih/ 4952 Ive SEWERAGE SERVICES ] is taw TX l+pmb'l rlvrrlpq ] 7 Vill.OPERATOR INFORMATION w,r+wu[ b tn[mina lDlay 1, uwn vnl.w[Iu aM camp 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT W YES O fto+s e.FTrt use O rw shem DnjEnr Me upproprr l.'sire inM v a ..ee Ooi:If Oebri',Nerou'.1 D.r ra.sire r.Jra n/ <L LI IDMn coon/rOmlor na/r/ P PRIVATE pperi/,vl S-STATE 0 .OTHER sipeeOL N A • a.rtwe[T ow P.o.aox 10944ELLIS AVENUE r OR Towe JG.STA74 H.ZIP eoee JIX.INDIAN LAND IS FOUNTAIN VALLEY II In'bcir to ry oled o n n mdn undII 9 T B (] YES NO .. r. .. .y ... n .. ., F ; X.EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS u IDYtnaga m Susie"A.n.l .Pie IA4!'m/Wwv�IreveaNSaH/eerj` - „ �� 9 N CA01 10604 we(Onde.....d/nktdpn Pl Fierdr/ THu pperlby - - frprr+fYj 9 U gr "e.Renw tea+[now wane» a.oTH[w"peril ) 9 nperr/yi R 9 xI.MAP Attach to this applicdt on a topographic map of thi area extending tout least on[Mile beyond property bounderieG'The map mint sho the outline of the facility, the location of each of its sxistmg and proposed intake and tl scl a ge structures,each of its hasaedow wasif, treatment, nolape -or disposal facilities and each well where 1t injects fluids u derground Include ellg,springs, IJers end other wrfacc water bodies in the map area.See Instructions for predse repulramsmt!; [ w �+ ♦f.+ L^ - / - XI I.NATURE OF BUSINESS heroride a brier description COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSEL OF DOMESTIC, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER XIII.CERTIFICATION(jerin+trvc6msl I density under penally of law that/have personally exsminad and am familiar with the lnforma lion sub ultrM In this application grid elf attachments and that, based on my inquiry of thaw persons immediately responsible for obtaining-the Informar/on ronrs' in the application, I believe that the information is true, accurate and complete. l am aware that there are siDn/ficaral Is /ties for wbnireinp 3333,5�^^^^L.v fNw information,including the possibility of line and impriwnerim, -%fr Hwu[aom ua nL ppve vevM0 Mer,r, Tuw[ 1,DwTa smH[e BLARE ANDERSON, GENERAL MANAGER COMMENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ��e .;'k . .. ,.T EPA Form 0510-1 18.90) DRAFT FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: FomrAryxovq II1499 Due hae bar 200 0066 ocsn cnoiioeoa FORM 2A NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW NPDES %tawew,ax+ APPLICATION OVERVIEW Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet and a"Supplemental Application Information"packet. The Basic Application Information,packet is divided into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A.and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part S. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental Application Information.packet.The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION: A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12. B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow>0.1 mild. All treatment works that have design flows greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through 8.6. C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C(Certification). SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION: D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D(Expanded Effluent Testing Data): 1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mild, 2. Is required to have a pretreatment program(or has one in place),or 3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information. E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E(Toxicity Testing Data): 1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 tugs, 2. Is required to have a pretreatment program(or has one in place),or 3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing. F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any significant industrial users(SIUs)or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F(Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as: 1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations(CFR)403.6 and 40 CFR Chapter 1,Subchapter N(sea instructions);and 2. Any other industrial user that: a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works(with certain exclusions);or It. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the treatment plant;or c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority. G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G(Combined Sewer Systems). ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART.0 (CERTIFICATION) EPA Form 351e,2A(Rev.1-99). Replaces EPA forms 755M 8 7550-22. Page 1 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Fvm Approval 111"9 OMBAkaxi 201t0055 OCSD CA0110604 BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION p` PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS: All lreaMinl works meal cdnplrle puntons A.l lMougM1ABo11hG Basic Application)formation packet F +t A.I. Facility lnlomstion. Fndary name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Mailing Address 10844 ELLIS AVENUE _ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 coned person ROBERT GHIRELLI Tied DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES THeptwne nurnyer (714) 593-7400 Facility Address SAME (not P.O.Box) A2. Applicant information. N din AppBcml is dlBermt legal ft amva,plwNO Ns foEPWlp: Appficanl name Missing Addreu Contact Foram Tie Telephone pumper Is the applicant the owner or operator in,both)of the liniment works? X swnw X opeassr Indicate wTeNar conimpopdanca regent,Nis .it annual M threaded In line facility or me applicant_ X family _ apppcanl AS. Existing Envlienmenlal Pumas. PnevUe the pemll numadr of any existingervtmnnenel Pemits eal have Lean issued a the treaVrent sake (nWde senJssued pampa). NPDES CA0110604 PSD OIC Corer RCRA Omer Al Collsetlon Sytlsm Intormalion. Pn .iniomafion m mutdq lWas aM areas wma Ly Ned Twilit/. Provne me rame and population of each ¢nary and.p known,provide kdometipn m We tYDa al mnemisn ayeem(comNlwd va.separetal eon its osnersM1ip(muniopal.pmale,roc.). Name Population Sorvad Type of Collection System OeinarsM1lp SEE ATTACHMENT 1 Total population..,ad EPA Form 3511tr2A(Rev. 1.99), Replaces EPA isms 7550d A 755421. Page 2 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMR NUMBER: Fern dpprwdelfaMg QYBNmOer 2lNDdpa6 OCSD CA0130604 A5. Indian CA.nUV. e. 16 the,bee Wanl works bceted M Vdian Cuvitw Yes X No b. Doss tie Veaunem wads dieN,arye to a mwMrg water Net b elNet in IMtan Country or Nat u upeWam ham(eM evanhMgytlmsa Wough)Indbn CounW Yee X No A.6. Flow. Ifdiwle Its design flaw raid of tie beaMtenl plats(I.e.,tie wastewater flow,rate Net DN plant was dda Is MMN). Aide,pmvde tie average chin amv nib eM mesimum d lbw eta for d tlm WI Nma years. Eedi yetis data muN b DesM on a 12+nm1N tlme pefbd wIN tie t2N monN s1 Thu yeah omLrdnB m more Nan Wad monW prim to ptls epPticatlon submlasl. 316—PRIMARY�200—SECONDARY (END OF PERMIT FLOWS, SEE APPENDIX P) s. Desi9n llcw,mle SEP 99 — AUG 00 SEP 00 — AUG 01 SEP 01 — AUG 02 T.Ywu Last Year Ihls Year It. MnuNaveregeaeayrowmts 239 241 231 mgd c. Masdn aeeynonmte 273 312 312 mgd AT. Coll.c9on System. Ir dose Me type(s)of mllao5on syabm(e).0 by NeWeWant plant. Chad all hell apply. Abe eeWsta Na pefoefd cortft bn(by miles)of each. X Sapemb saneary eewm 100 % C Nm some aid sanitary sewer % AA. D40.,..end ONer Disposal Method.. e. Does tie V..W nit woes d'gchame efb ant b waters of the U.S.? X Y" No If yes,rut how many of saw of tie lorawing types of discttarye pomb the Vealmenl woks uses: I. Dbc ides of"Mee df.enl 3 fi. DisWipas of algid of partially boated oRlumt 0 15, Cmnbinad sewer overflow polnis 0 W. C sevaed...rgency overnows(pnor tome lwedwoft) 0 Otlar b. Doe.tie VeaWenl warkc disdialgeeM..t to basin..Polls.or other mHoce unpouMmanls Nat do mt have oAlets for dbdmma b waters of tie U.S.? Yes X No a yes,pmvide UM folbwbq Re eso sudam ImoouMmant: Lotalies Medal a mqe daily volume Msclmrged to eudaco Impmmmanl(s) mgd 1.di ,, continudve m Intaonl isnt7 c. Does tie he.w eel wome lar�ePpy Vestedi weelowater? Y. X No It yes.provide Me follovmg for eats IeM eddreation sbe: location: Number o1 Anmal avers,¢daily volume applied b site: Mgd Is IeM applimtlon _ oongnusu.m InNrmNanti d. Dees NalreaMentw UdisWrgeortmnsmnrt abdmunVealedwate Wrt oe er hemmenl wodw? Yee X No EPA Form 3510- A(Rev.1-99). Replaess EPA forms 7550L S 756 22. paps 3 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Form AAPaMd ttlalpa OMB AVmMr 2016dWB OCSD CA0110604 Nyee,deavme are meon(s)by Stich th w tewelm hom the Meelmenl woks Is discherged or UamWted tithe other Mealment eneg (e.g.,lent,truck,plos). N beAsW Is by a path olhar Men Me epplkmd,mmdde: TlonspoMrnams: MBBIng Md.: Denwcl panoon: TMe: Tesphorre rwmber. For each aealment werMs Met noeeives Ms dsehmae,proWtle the Iolb": Name: Malang Address: context peKM: Thle Tesphona number B known.prmnde the WIDER pamR number of Me beebnmd wsdx Mal roc¢sae Ms dlelsoMe. Provide Me average dash,Bow note hom Me beebrent woks MR,the recaMng hooky. mgd a. Does Me heahnenl Works discharge or dbpoaB M Ba weakwresf In a manner not MoI M AB.a through ABA above(s.g.,undeopm.nd pmmletbn,wall trBedbn)T Yea X No Byes,provide Me following for sad dheesel method: Description of method(IocWdng bmgoo and ass of eU(s)B appll®ble): Annual deny .=dspoaed of by this method: N dspmel lhreugh this method wnWwouam IMermidaMT EPA Form 35t P2A(Re,1-99). R,I..s EPA rmms T55M&T550.22. Page 4 of 21 FACB.IT'NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Foen Agwnefe9p Illegal ( Akmker 2Dlegal a OCSD CA0110604 .` 'I�,A$TEWATEN DISCHARGES: � �'L��"d" r ny v- � r-'+'bAi .y{Sy tiYfis r � iAM+)•W,[�a to Oueelion i5- � 'S� r �� v i M� 4 �.Oo rot l Gbtla 4TpsnfaBbi - }!r%8b`., WN'Ft Adillf�'til�yiilatlon lnrgmamnr«�' A.6 Duerlyilm aOutlaR SEE ATTACHMENT 2 FOR DESCRIPTION OF OOTPAIbS 2 AND 3 a Ouaall number 1 k location IfTfrortown YappllubN) (ZIP(10ae) ORANGE CAI.IFORNIA I' (state) 33 34' 36" 118 0' 36" IIeuWEel 11-on axle) C. Oiclance Irem stare(n applicable) 23.800 ti d. Depth belowsudam(I applicable) 197 R. e. Average daM flow rem 231 n,aa 1. Does Nis oudall have el l er an Intermittent a a perbak d'aWuge7 Yes X No (goto A9g.) g yes.Orovicle Ota following Infomu0on: Number W times per rear dllcna,c occom: Avenge dunticn of each discharge: Average few per aiuharge: .9d Monlhf In wltkh d'tsWnge oars: p. Is wttall e,.1,ed volh a difts al x Yes No A.10.DescflpWn of Receiving Wafers. a. Nameofrewivingwater PACIFIC OCEAN b. Name of waW.Wd IX krgwn) UrvTed States Soo Conservation Service 1"iift watershed code if knovm), c. Name of StaleManepemonVRivar Basin Rl known): United Stales Geologlml Survey 541pb hydrobgic calW"I g unA code(d known): d. Critical bw flow of remlWn9 euvare(aeppr"We): acne Ws Cironk cis e. Talel hardnns al remMing steam el aitiml bsv flow(a apDlimbb): mgA W CaCOg EPAFonn351D-2A(Rev.I.99). Replaces EPAlamts T5505AT55022. Page5ai21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Fain Ani m ed NI499 OMB Nanyr 10N(FWaa OCSD CA0110604 A.11. Description of Treatment 9. Met levels of treatment are pmvicled?Check an But apply. X pmomr, X Secore ary Advanced Other. Describe: b. Indicate the fdlbwrg;remowl W.(es applicable): *END OF PERMIT Dosign BCD.hemmed!g Design CBODr removal 76* % Design SS removal 85* % Omagh Pmrteval NIA % Design N mmoval N/A % Other % c. Mat type of disinlei is used for the advent hen this oulfall?If disinfection carter by season,plane descrbe. CHLORINATION If disinfection b by cMonn eon,Is de0lodratbn used for this outeli X Yn No d. Does the treatment plant hew local wrationi Yse X No A.1]. Edon Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of Tee US must umvid.eMuot bating data for Tee f.H.smp pammstoe.Pmvid.the indicated effluent testing rewired by the parmllling authority for each oulfall thrduah which effluent Is discharm, . Do not include Information on combined sewer overflows In His section.All Information reported must M based on data collected through analysis conducted using AO CFR Part 156 methods. In addition,this data must comply with OAIOC requirements of 10 CFR Pan 106 and other appropriate DAIOC requirements for standard method.for analyse not addressed by 0 CFR Pan 136. At minimum,effluent tasting data must be based on at lost three samples and must be no mom than four and ons-half years span. Curial nvrtder. 1 PARAMETER IAAXIMUM DAILY VALUE AVERAGE DAILY VALUE Value - Units Value y4 UNle Number of Samples H MlNmum save M MasMum save -",r,,.,K+�f-�;�M�,• Flew Rats Temperature Inter Temperature Summer F« H lease re n a minimum ark a maalmum dal vahre POLLUTANT MAXIMUM DAILY AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE ANALYTICAL MLfMDL DISCHARGE METHOD Cones Unit. Con.. Units Number of Samples CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS. BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN BOO5 DEMAND(Report one) CSOD-5 FECAL COLIFORM TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS(TSSI END OF PART A. REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE EPA Forth 351062A(Rev.1.99). Replaces EPA forms 955P66 7556YL. Page 6 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: OMB Numker 2040,0060 OCSD CA0110604 I all :,ON P[fRAPPLICA 91A R.I. Infiftemil.fifteatim Estimed,Me average number of gallons Per day hot Smv,Into the Va@bM[woft all billow VI&Nbth 0* IRA *DRY WEATHER FLOWS Sri**suplaket"slop underway or planned M minknize Inflow and Infloation. SEE APPENDIX Q FOR DESCRIPTION OF COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM 6Z Topographic Map. Allah to flas appICSOCOM.topographic map of he area extends,at lead che mile beyond today property bourals'les. M& map must show he oulline Oft IsoMly and Me fol Informuthan. (You may submit me thanche map done map does not show ftenflon moo) b. ssoro mantere boated wastowater� fischarged from Me treatment part. Include cuffalls from bypass piping.K aWficattle. c. Each well where wastewater koho the tharnment plant b lojecol underground. d. Wells.springs.cher.6.water Wis..and dftkft water walls had!am:1)widen 114 mile 0 Me property boundaries of ft"abrunt works.and 2)Meted h public mcord or Otherwise shown W the arlAkNint. 4. My areas where the amwelge Mudge produced by ft treatment works b stored.treated,or disposed. 1. K ft treatment works recelwas waste Met te chassatfied as incautious under Our Resource Conservation ON Recovery Act(RCRA)by sums,.11, or special pip,show on the map winer,Met loomolous waste entwe the troatound works and where 11 is treated,stood.andkhr disposed. B], Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram stowing Be proonclues of he treatments pAmt,including all bypass piping and 0 backup Alcopmvidee vvaterbhhncce sturw[Vall Instrument unk,including distruschm(e.g,010harthm.nd dechlonfination). The waW balance must affim daily average SOO,rates at influent and discharge points and approximate defly flow raw bebwarm "Wronlunite. Include o brief mosU"dmOpOon dam digmm. 0.4. Operstionflaalnumance Performed by Conbraci Ans any"riAlocal or maintenance aspecla(related to wastewater trestoreent and argued quality)of the treatment works her hersionsibillty of concluctuef —y" -ANd It yes,Pat the name.address.telephone number.and slatua of each contrudor tundl describe 0.cortmul.e.h.,pornsibillties(Much ackiltional'am ifoacesecary). Name Mailing Address: Telephone NumW. RealpohnsibMWO of Conrad.,. B.P. Scheduled Improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide tolohnsficrn on any uncOmploted implarnuffludon achadde M uncemplet pbmfmimpmv menbftiwitBffedmewastemterUenlment.effluonlquaRy,mdwignwpacftydoaWantonlworks. the hutment wake M1u eevaml diflerenl implementeti.achetlulss a b plemunp several Improvemenb,aubmil upemte reapoasss to quartdo.BA for .ch. IXritane,polo question B.S.) SEE APPENDIX J b. Innficale whether ft planned Improvements or Implemenlation schedule are required by local,State.or Federal agendas. —Y. X No EPA Form3510 M(Rev.1-99), Replaces EPA forms 75W 6&7551-22 Page 7 of 21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Form Appp,.ad Vfpap OCSD CA0110604 oMe wr^bw goeo.00ae c If to anawse Is,8.5.6 Is Noe.'Malty desomm,molesting now mstlmum dNy mhos,role Of applicable). c. Pit dotes bnposad by any comptance stlaelule a arty actual dated of completion for the implementation steps label O ,as applicable. For bnprovemenN glennnd Independently a/boil,SMb,or Federal agencies,lidtab PlamuM or DOW oeoplallon dabs,se applicable. Indicate cause as acourolaty as PonNle. Sdbdule acual Completed Implementation St MM/DDIYYYY MM/DOIVVW -Begin coneWWon JJ_ J—/_ -End concoction -Begin Set JJ— JJ_ -AtaN operegonal level JJ— _/J_ e. Have eppmedele pemdWtlearm cos cseRanmg other FndereVSlab reeuimmen s been oMaNndT _Yea _No Describe bnaty: 0.6.EFFLUENT TESTING DATA(GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY). Applicants Vast cischaipe b waters of the US must I mvbe effluent reaWg data forthe blbwing pammatere. Prevba the bdlrabel eflluenl tasNrg raquho by One germlltig auflonTy for each oute0 Nreaeh which effluent Is dischamad Oo ml induce Nlormetlan on canbbwc sewer wedbwa b Ws sarJbn, All Nfoenaton reported musl In,based on dole collected Ihmugh analyds conducted using 40 CFR Pen 135 malloda. In addition,tide data most comply WIN DA/OC requirements of 40 CFR Pen 135 and other epercpdete OAIOC requirements,for standard metwds for aralylm not addmmwd by s0 CFR Pad 135. Ate minimum,effluent lestdg cata must lea based on et lessi was poIMMM swm and must be no more tan four and one-had yeses old. Outall Number 1 SEE ATTACHMENT .3 POLLUTANT MAXIMUM 0�-'-' c / 61EYe`IihR �y •�°' ' . '6� S:P "". "' " u.,; B�'+^t � _: CdS4'I fa 1�R � CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVIW 1 IMAL COMPOUND& AMMONIA(aa N) CHLORINE(TOTAL RESIDUAL,TRC) DISSOLVED OXYGEN TOTALKJELDAHL NITROGEN N NITRATE PLUS NITRITE NITROGEN OIL and GREASE PHOSPHORUS(Toted) TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS(TDS) OTHER :v r Zo tYEFERTdTNEAC'f�LIC4IION#1NE�IE EPA Foam 35WA(Rev, 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550E S 755( V. Pap BO121 FACILITY NAME AND PERMa NUMBER: Farm Apla V'NO ONa Numaar 2OW0p9a OCSD CA0110604 BASIC APPLICATION INFIOAM 1`' .1 PART C.CERTIFICATCN: AAaPpSmEkdmLIPCgBEmIYonScpSm. r Slfc4 a[71SF - ePV�IlirmMl wrllyYelaLd'aW��aen8artetlF' 'Alm( W - _ wMl¢IedaMere-Wtiin9un6 Bpyq�A�fl`9islu6oq' -� FARd Dal loJhe iea7 '";brwNchlidse"'IR316m6` ..� �> vz�c-u`2r' f�,�_ "{ Indicate which Part of Form 2A you have completed and am submiDing: X Bask APPUWWn Ink,mAS n pallet Suppamantel Acefagon Inlo melon packot X Porl D(EApended EMuentT.UWData) X Pan E rrosk o,Tasting: BbmoNtoft Dow) X PanF(IndmMWUser Dbda andRCRNCERCIAWu ) Pan G TAmWra d Sew Systems) ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETESHE FOLLOWINGCERTtpIOATIf)N[: - I urft uMer Penally of have Ual mIS document and all atlMrmmts we prepared under my dVecUon M supervbbn In asson anpe AM a system designed b aswre Uat Rua99ad persorvNl gopNy geVlar end evaWete V1e InlornetiaT wMNtled. Bawd m my bquiry dMe parson as pelaaro who manage tlw system or Uww cersora Seedy reacemiNe for palhedlp Ule iMpmeUm,tlx InbmaSon b,m Ur bed d my krlanladge and OegeL teas.emnab,eM canpbla. I am aware UUI Uxxe ere aipnil ant ceneltlx for wdnitlng 4be INomallm,Indudtrq the pweWHly oifine entl Impdwrvnerd iw Wcwlg vloletlom Nameanaortdelwa MAKE P. ANDERSON GENERAL MANAGER `JgraW Telephone number (714) 962-2411 Date spned Upon re uwt ol"parmitgrg eutft.you must whmh any oftwA Woma5cn newssary b assess xastewabr Vealmenl pracgcas el Ua treaeneN xvMa ar IdanUy eppropdab permlUbg reWiremwb. SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO: EPA Form 35162A(Rev, 1-99). Replaces EPA lanes 755M 6 755 V2 Page 9 of 21 FACILRY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Fmn Appaed fnwsa OCSD CA0110604 are 1.apeddpoe SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES Alteration fit works receiving dischsrgo.from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,or other remedial wastes moat .MPMtr Part F. GENERAL INFORMATION: F.I. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment wads have.or is it subjed to,an approved pematnent pogram9 X Yes—No F.I. Number of Signifi...I Industrial U.era ISIUs)mtl Ceteporical lntlualrlsl Usen(CIUQ. Provge Ne aanberdurT dihe roaowLp rypead industrial users Net discherge to ale trwtrhem wvtka. a. Number offervcelepori®I SIUS. 126 b. NumberolCNs. 243 SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION: Supply the following Information for each SIU. If mom than one SIU discharges to the treatment worm,copy question.F.3 though F.S and provide the Information m ...led for uch SIU. F3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide de name and address all Coen SIU dischargog to the treatment worm. Submit sddtlgnal pages as neusswy. Name: SEE ATTACHMENT 5 Mailing Address: FA. Industrial Proaou.. Describe all of the Industrial procamas that agerd or wnbit b fie SIU NI F.S. Principal Productl.)anal Raw Mabrial(s). Describe all of ale pdndPal proNMea nM rew maMr als met aRod or contrbuM W the SIU' discourage. Principal Ptodud(s): Raw madmipi): F.S. Flow Nate. S. Proceed wmMwater flow rate. handle the svorage daily volume d process wastewater dacrarged into me collection syabm in gallons per day (9ptl)end whether he discharge as continuous or Miami" goal L_congn..a_mtemimenp b. Nonlga:ass wastewater hew of IMieala the average daily volume all riompmce]d wastewater goes,disdteryvd lob de collection system in gallons per day(gpd)arM whether the discharge is continuous or intemphinal gpd I condnuousa Ntwmittent) F.T. Pretreatment Slantlnd.. Indicate wheOm ale SJU is subject to the folio irg: Is Local limha —Yale _No b. Categorical p eteatment dMrMartls _Yes No R subjed lo categorical pmindismad sbtm Ws,which category eat subcalegorp EPA Form 35i0M(Rev.1.99). Replaces EPA forms)550E S]551 g3, Page 16 d21 FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: Fwrn Aoprpvad r114e CNB NwrWar 2pa0+Ma6 OCSD CA0110604 F.O. Peddlemnt the Tresti Woda Attributed to Waste Discharged by the Sltl. Has the SIU caused or centdbutel to any Pmbtems(e.g.. u eels.Interference)a1 Me treatment weds in the pal three ears? -Yee If yes,describe each episode. RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK,RAIL,OR DEDICATED PIPELINE: F.B. RCRA Waste. Dos We treatment worlu re lve or Ms K In We pest three years,solved RCRA hea,doum waste by l a ,nil,or dodloted plp7 _Yes X No(go W FA2.) F.10. Waste TrenapaM1 Medved by w it RCRA waste le re "d(check all Nel oppfy): _Truck _Roll _Dedkale l Pip, F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount(volume or memo,specify uni EPA HevaMous West,Number Ag,o ml Link CERCLA(SUPERFUND)WASTEWATER,RCRA REMEDIATIOWCORRECTIVE ACTION WASTEWATER AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER: F.12. Remedlallon Waste. Does the treaanent works currently(cr has K been nolBed Wal 11 will waste from remetliel ectivitlee? X Yes; (wmpNle F.131hrough F.15) _No Province a fist of sites and the requested Information(F.13•F.15.)fa each anent and future site. F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and types of faWly at which the CERCL ARCRAa other remedial waste originate,(a te expected to origOpte In the sat No years). STRINGFELLOW SUPERFUND SITE EPA ID BCAT080012826 F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous oosgtuanls teal ero recewed(a are azpedatl W bs Ruined). InGuOe dale on vdums and ConCanaalbn,K known. (AKerA additional shei 11 naoasasry). HEAVY METALS, VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, PESTICIDES, POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS, AND SULFATES. FAA Wash Trsalmml. a. Is this waste basted(or will It bs treated)Prior W Meaning the beam works? X Ye, _No If We,describe the bealmenl imbeds Information about lip removal efficiency): LIME PRECIPITATION AND GRANULER ACTIVATED CARBON b. Is the discharge(or will No discharge bs)ocnlinucus or Intermitter? R Cunfinuous _IntermlKenl II Intermittent describe discharge schedule. END OF PART F. REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE EPA Foun 35162A(Rev.1.99). Replaces EPA forms 7MM It 7550 22 Page 19 of 21 FACILITY HAMEAND PERMIT NUMBER: Rem AAomved 1110" OCSD CA0110604 oMBykrnw % 1W A 0.1. System Mae. Pemile a map belkaft Me fok,":(ma,W Included Mth Seek Applicabon Information) a. M CSO dbdmW Pcinde. b. .hisrulin,WOW...mt.). C. w stem tut supped ft"lanedamemeN sp� SPOenuyaffectstlbycsos. G.2. Syte.Di.q... indudes the folbAing Womertim: b. WOotionsof points whom sopMets menllaryeawam food Info the combined sewer system. d. CSO OUTFALLI - -. —.—, F, i ANAVUL IINT ................... G.S.DudpOm clOuffall. a. OutheNnumber b. Loceflon (CMorlovm.ffa,p%cabW) (ZIP Coda) (C rdy) (Sur.) (unw.) (Lon,%nis) D ttmce from shore(ff OppScelt4e) ft. d. Depth W.audece(U Mpll.bts) ft. e. WhIph,of the followlt,mare monhorml daring Me test year for this CSO? —FLOWAll —�Cso ponuuml eonoenlmlkms —CSO IrMpOancy —CSO SpOr Ooi.m. —ReOeNft water quohly G.A. I. Now meM glom,events ware rtronlloretl dudrg the bet yeen CSO Events. a. GwMsn.mtx,rdCS0..rdshMsImtywp. ..nM(—Mtipolm—.pproa.) b GW the mmegodumbim per CSO event houns( actual M—Oppms.) EPA Form 351( M(Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 1556 &)5502 . Pepe 20ol2l FACILITY NAME AND PERMR NUMBER; Form Aapm En+upP OMB NumMr y(Maeeafi OCSD CA0110604 c. Glve the evarape wWme PM CSOawLL mllflm Balblm(_edieler_epgps.) d. G)vethemWmumminfall Nettuseda CSOeve in UiekW"w. IMM draWMR G.S.D...dpU..pf Recalving Welen. e. Name d recalri�p wamr 0. Namedwabnfted/mrer/steam system: UMW States W Convervedm SeM 144git MMn code(M known): c. Name d SMIe MeneeemeiNRiver BesN: UnUW Steles Gedapical Survey SdigU hydmlopk cetdopbg wh code(p known): _ G.S.CSO Op..Uepe. Oesrn any known waters Ml9y Impads on Ne mcoivkg water reused by M%CSO(eV..pam mnl m IMmmbbM beats&eoga,pammneMm IntmmMeM slw9 Ish bed dosfeps,fief,kits,Rah Wv¢odas,dhe,reaeaLwml loss-er vM.d e1 any aPp5mawe Stele water WBRey Sm rd). .: ,� •t a p.5 ..w T a' 9x v 4 .ode -y ;REFER703H�a!`ApL: "'�`f� EPA Form S51GM(Rev.1-99). Rapl.EPA f.m 7 5D9 815502 . Papp21 o121 RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 FLOW SCHEMATIC wwentw P.Im.ry Em..m bneml vwlelr mmt Mebrlry CMetlA TrltLll plllxr 2 Anlen., lMutnl Mf. Dlrenaxn aenem •j Om Pelymel IIMIn DbtlM rAN Obu<wn !n•mbn 1 1 nnuenl 3 auae. A.m u.Mn xnM Oc an- A<•."u.0 vnm.ry pamm emn.m A. Oru.na a••I"• Dlee•xranm wee a<n.nl vwe.O.mnnen I. Una•mw unarnPli pmerwm Rimer, v.n•n DAI amape Tnm\enea amaw N.<ytx cikbJJ. aLlmminp• rump abn.n °eP�a'oa IIIMx P<IYnp Ben.. IM TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 FLOW SCHEMATIC ae• ELLm AVE. °ai•" PUYP .U .11 aTATION a Ll . Feul An .a3I apnm.'smwn, pncn.me. Emum, o0 aexmrPum,MrNrNbn.L8 an,..aam..M1p Ie .3llli -1Emwm yy, OrkinDAFpnxn Tnitbma Dnm 61met. ,map• cnxM. pl ..ua 1 PP gon alwn ce bmt v ,mn fIIV.,. M<y<b Pum, euuen 6.n Min u.. nro Process Flow Diagram of Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2000-01. orange County sanitation District,California Orange County Water District 8.28 MGD 23 MGD Trickling TBOD 52 mg/L 3.4 MGD Net Redamatkm Filters TSS 66 mglL RECLAMATION PLANT N0.1 83 MGD 30 MGD "CBOD151...84Pdmary Influent SWastewater Crean Discharge 30 MGD TBOD 754 In Oug TROD 72 mglL all Booster CBOD 60 malt. TREATMENT PLANT N0.2 Pdmary Effluent TSSTSS 76 mg/L station TSS 50 mglL Flow 231 MGD 152 MGD 69 MGD Primary AeOvaled TBOD 9.5 malt. Influent Basins Sludge Wastewater TSS 12.9 mg/L 93 MGD TBOD 110 mg/L Pdmary Effluent TSS 63 mg/L VSH Annual Average of Biochemical Oxygen Demand and Total Suspended Solids Contribution from Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Processes for Fiscal Year 2001/02. Orrge County Sanitation DIsMd,Caflfomin ATTACHMENT FORM 2A ESTIMATED POPULATION WITHIN OCSD'S SERVICE AREA' CITY POPULATION Anaheim 334,700 Brea 36,850 Buena Park 79,800 Costa Mesa 110,700 Cypress 47,250 Fountain Valley 55,900 Fullerton 129,300 Garden Grove 168,600 Huntington Beach 194,600 Irvine 157,500 La Habra 60,700 La Palma 15,850 Los Alamitos 11,700 Newport Beach 72,500 Orange 132,900 Placentia 48,300 Santa Ana 343,700 Seal Beach 24,700 Stanton 38,100 Tustin 69,100 Villa Park 6175 Westminister 89,700 Yorba Linda 60,800 Unincorporated Areas 95,000 Total Service Area 2,384,425 The Orange County Sanitation District owns and operates the regional interceptors and trunklines in the service area. It also owns and operates the local sewer collection systems within portions of the City of Tustin, Irvine and unincorporated county areas. The remainder of the local sewer collection systems are owned and operated by their respective cities. All collection systems are separate sanitary sewers. ' Orange County Facts 8 Figures, Center for Demographic Research,California State University, Fullerton,June 2002 2 Portions of the wastewater flow in Irvine are treated by the Irvine Ranch Water District. PJI wastewater solids(sewage sludge)are treated by the Orange County Sanitation District. f Estimate based upon the year 2000 numbers provided by the Center for Demographic Research. ATTACHMENT FORM 2A DESCRIPTION OF OUTFALLS 2 AND 3 Outfall Number 2 A.9 a. Outfall Number: 2 — Emergency Outfall b. Location: Orange, California. Latitude 33036'56", Longitude 117°58'13" c. Distance from shore: 2,100 meter. d. Depth below surface: 65 feet. e. Average daily flow: 0 million gallons/day. Emergency outfall only. f. Does this outfall have either an Intermittent or a periodic discharge? Yes, emergency only. [This discharge has not been used since it was removed from service 30 years ago; however, it remains available for emergency use.] g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? Yes A.10-A.12 - Same as Outfall 1. Outfall Number 3 A.9 a. Outfall Number: 3 — Emergency Overflow b. Location: Orange, California. Latitude 33°38'06", Longitude 117°57'20" c. Distance from shore: N/A d. Depth below surface: N/A e. Average daily flow: 0 million gallons/day. Emergency outfall only. f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? Yes, emergency only. g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? No A.10 Description of Receiving Waters a. Name of Receiving Water: Santa Ana River b. Name of Watershed: Santa Ana River Watershed c. United States Geological Survey 8-digit cataloging unit code: 18070203 A.11-A.12 —Same as Outfall Number 1. ATTACHMENTS NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS D24Y TOTAL LOW. ONLY DAILY IND.♦ INOUSTRIAL SANITARY IND SANITARY SANITA WORK VOLUME VOLUME FISCAL FLOW FLOW TRY 'IMVAR FLOW PERMTNO cOMPANYNAME SEWER STREET SEWEn CITY SEWER ZIP CATEGORY DAYS (MGY) (MGY) YEAR IMG() (MGD) (MOD) TYPE SIC AAADEBURRINGAIN TUMBLING. 52.1.]50 IN6. 1095 N.PARMER STREET ORANGE 92a6] CSDOC 2A1 00621 0D914200L2M2 00002 0W01 00ZA pity Litt- 111112 3-"% A 6 G ELECTROPOLISN 1.3.WAnO St FOUNTAIN VALLEY 92TM METAL FINISHING PSNS ] 0,FUNI 007 2601-2002 OMIJ 0000 00017 Male DeenoW 132813 56140 A A K DEBURRING AND TUMBLING 2Ma S.VALE ST.UNIT N SANTA ANA 927GF CSDOC T0000 0.01 =N-2002 SIMON 00001 OfiWl Preens Meter 112115 2m!A A 6 R POWDER COATING INC. 1196E N.GROVE ST. ANAHEIM N. METAL FINISHING PENS 27E 03AG 0.0610 MN. M2 0.001 D.0002 O001 Car Meter ]]2912 A P W ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS LLD 2-1.N1 SWIM 525 E.SOUTH ST. ANAHEIM 92M METµ FINISHING PSNS 3.m5 OA07 2001.2002 &014 0.002$ 0 0172 Pmmn Molar 332322 2-0-074 A P W ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS.LLD 2100E.ORANGEMOODAVE. ANAHEIM 9210MISIM METAL FINISHING PSE$ M 1000 1.105 21a1-3M3 00(s O0051 OOIO2PHareaa Meter 332322 2.1.192 AROSERVICE IINN.GROVEST. ANAHEIM 926N METAL FINISHING PSNS 26 0.14 0227 M1.2002 0. 06M OfiOP BI 3364H iAA39 ACCURATE CIRCUIT ENGINEERING A195.KIl5CN OR. SANTA ANA 921107 METµ FINISHINGF3N5 N 1.1111 03 201 0.00CA D.0015 0.0057 Car Meter 034412 ACCURATE METAL FA&LICATORS t Uld12 NC, loll SE4 BEACH BLVD. SEAL BEACH W710 METµ FINISHINGPSNS so Tom 2555 =1M2 0.007 (YOUT 0,0143 EAMenl Meter 322116 2-1446 ACROBURR INC.12 1IRS N.GROVE ST, ANAHEIM 9RM CSOOC 24 0.164 DSSHI 8001-3M2 0d00 a0l)N 0000 Plcuss Meter 332612 1-1-115 ACTIVE PLATING INC. MIT E.POMONA ST. SANTA ANA 92705 METAL FINISHING PSNS 29 4 2 O.N5. 2001 DDIAB D.OM DAISS FRAI Meter 332613 SHUN ADVANCE MON MTNG NC. NZI E.MIMLOMA AVE.FS ANAHEIM 92. METAL FINESHING PSNS 2S 0Does 0037 2001-20M 0,0012 DGM OMM PIornaa Mstar 522610 2.1p AW.CETECHMTNGa1D.R TNT N.GROVE ST. ANAHEIM 92806 METAL FINISHING PSNS N 1.112 0 033 2001-Ma CAGS2 O.OMf 00040 PrvyM Meter 022615 24424 AERA ENERGY LLC 4024 VALLEY VIEW AVE. YORBA LNDA 926e6 DINED N e72 0073 2001-2002 1.214 D.M2 1.2947 Eftere Meter 211111 2`14005 AEM ENERGY LLC 02 ROSE DR.AT VESIMUS BREA 92821 WOOD 36 am 006212001-20(2 0.002 Gallo 0,00211 EOMmI Mier 211111 3A4N3 AIR INDUSTRIES COR1FLHAFNA N TIMCHAPMANAVE. GARDEN GROVE NMI CSDOC 15 0m 0.522 2001-21)(12 0.0008 O.0021 0.002 EIMmt Meter 3327M NONFERROUS METALS .1.10 MRINWSTRIESCORP.XNOTT 125H)HNOTf ST. GARDEN GROVE B2M49W2 FORMING ]I 3.144 INS 2M1-2M2 O60I01 0.01 0022 ON MCIx M21N .11 EN Pµ1M AVE.SM. 2-1-UZ SALL METAL PAINT STRIPPING INC.02 CN AHAXEIM 92ep7 CSOOC 0. OON 2M1-M 0.O0)(11 OOON O. } 12 ALL METµS PRWESSING OF O.C. 5.1.110 INC. SWI STANWSTWAL ST. STNIfW NN0 METAL FINISHING PSNS 2 2.1 IN ZMt-IM2 0.01] OODFf OA1 ce,MNn =13 2-t-Itt ALLIED PACIFIC METAL STAMPING MI EN PALIM AVE. ANAHEIM 92906 C$OOC 2 1 OM 2M1-2M2 0. 0. 0 Pla W. =its METµ MWgNG S SI-0T2 µLOY NE CASTING CO. fiSSp GL9AMEpp BLVO. BUENA PMK B06A CASTING 2 0. GoO ZM1-ZM2 0. 0. 0 Mimi µUOY TELH ELECTROPOLISHING 1A-0b INC. 2220 S.HURON DR. SAVTA ANA m>DL METAL FINISHING a--- 2 07040.01 1I"I O.M2 0 0. S02SI2 'Highlighted Field Indicates 10.212002 921 AM Batch Discharga,Which Is NPOES 2A Applke0an AtlalTmanl 5-SIUS.KI$ Probably an Ialerini0enl DI9tllarge. Page 1 of 17 ATTACHMENTS NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DneY TOTAL L01Y. GAILY DMLY ING♦ _ INWS1RIµ SM'RPRV IND SANITARY SnNITP WORK �tgLUME SWLUME. 'Fl q 'UMWGIT !i FL01Y RV 1WIARFLOY(� PERMIT NO CO'.'P fJiv NnlnE $EYPRKTBEET $EWER CIry $CMRZIP GTEGORY DAYS 21MGYt�f Y AGVIi F4YEAR GG 8 GD (MGD) TYPE L gB115KV PARK CIRCLE. ALO$0 LTEKC'A6VIT 1!R SNe Y 'ANTE 9$6V MET LFINISHING PSN$ OMIT 0W) mi-N]2 0. 0(WI 0OXe Ch, Meter 1N112 ALMATRON LECTRONICS,INC. 6CI E.VWNG$T. SANTA AN4 9Pp5 METµ FINISHING PSN$ ]I 1AZ01 OJM 2W1-21p2 OMI OMII OM56 CIIy Meter 0.'Mtl2 µSMO.INC. L.ICTNEWEM 2.13)A MFG.CO.INL. SOp E.LERRROS AVE. ANNIEIM g2605 LSOOC SO 1M.m 3.11 2W130W 0.972 owlis owla E61ueM MNer 3I3210 ALUMINUM FGiGE-ON.CR ALUM. -INS PRECIS10H M s E.µTG1 AVE SIJITAMIA W"? ALUMINUM!FOPMIHG 1 1 1. 21p1-MM 0. OW NH FII MMN ]]21t2 ALUMINUM%tEGISION PRGGIR$ Ab 1-I INC.GE µ NTR ]1]2 W.LEN)ML SNF)ANIA 93)IN µUMINUM FORMING n4 1 0.49F 2001-2W2 GOOF OMI 0. Clry Melw 112112 ALUMINUM PRECISION PRODUCTS 1-1-100 INC ON-SU HIMS.E$NSM-IFIN Sµ))A AIU 921d µVMINUAI FORMING MI 06 0. =1*2002 001 OXSW a CXy Meter 1J2112 2-Id61 AMG)NAN CICLIFSE RCIT INC. IBOIEROSSIYNN/VENUE FWERTGI 9231 CSOOC 0 0 21p1-ZOM 8.01 0. 0. Pr¢eM MNar ]2II11 MIERIGN CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY 2-13A9 INC. $].'p E.INNrp1 AVE ANANEIM 9)M) METAL FINISHING P5N5 27 2.57 0.303 21U13102 am OM11 0010 Pvev MNw i)412 AMERIMAN BUIIDINC P110GFT3 2-1-102 INC. Mea N.BUSY ARAGON T. _BUENA 02M! CIL SOOc COATING 197F O.ID) ZO]LZM2W. 1, OOOF ONO] E ealM JJ2111 G-I AMERIMC INC. 6%SAMGGFG0. SVENAPARN 91610 METOL 21974 IZJ] 2001-= MF 0Ce9 Beach bd, ]RI10 6-1-006 AMETEK AEROSPACE 9]016TN 6TREET NEWPORT BEACX 026N METµ FINISHING P5N5 2 0. IA A01-TO2 . OW9r Beach ]LI10 2-0-IIH ANAHUJA EXTRUSION CO.INC. 1]W-IJIO N.KRAEMER UlD.ANAHEIM QOM µUMINUM FORMING east 0 2M1-200] . O.W] CXV Meier J]IJIB 2A-I51] ANAXEW PLATING 6 POLISHINGINL,920 E SOUTH ST. ANAHEIM 921 METµ FINISHING PSNS 2 0. SA 2001-2O120. Sell CA,~ ]]2Bq 1-1-055 ANOOVNE INC. 22WI SOUTH SLLLN STREET SAMA. 92FIN LETµ FINISHING PSNS 2] $.IW OJ119F.1-ZIp2OW11 0019 F, MNN ]JAI] ANOMIL ENT.DSA OANCO METµ 1.t-155 SURFACING 101 W.RGINANO SArITAANA 92M EIPLTRCHADNG A1pLJEA$%1 ON 2WI-20020. 0011 Cry MNw 33211$ f-1LM AOLASCON COMPANY 1]08EPoMONA S). SURAAXA 92M5 CSOOL O.W 2W13W2OAWt O.OW1 PmyO MNwwim AGRARIAN LOAnXGS2A-1M LORFGiATICN IIbNTUSTNAVE ANAHEIM 92W1 METµ FINISHING P5N5 O1 21O13W20 OWFC6V MNw ]]b12 1L101 ARNODELECTRONICBWL.N J10EFOURMAVENIIE .A IABM 90W1 METµ FINISHING PSNS1 0]2] 2W1S?XG0 0051 Prcmv MNw SL112 MRIOAHEAO NIODUGT$ .11.11111A AVE IOS.VAMITO$ 90T10 METµ FINISHING PSES 162 =1 2W20A1 O.-I Pmmar Malts —13 ARTISTE RATINGLMETµFINISHING.W MS E.LGML0A5 AVE ANAIEIM W. AETµ FINISHING FENS 1]N 20013W20 0. PHYiFFIMY 3321 'Highlighted Field Indicate$ 11912112002 9:21 AM Bath Discharge.WhINh IS NPDES 2A Application AeeUlment 5-SIUs.ds PMhahly an Intermittent OisPJlarge, Pepe 2 d 17 ATTACHMENTS NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS wIL. TOTAL FLOW, DAILY DAILY IND. .r INDUSTRIAL SANITARY IND SANITARY SANITA �1•ya'' .0 WORN W LUME VOLUMF.� FISCµ` FLOW • LO'N'• RV -WWM FLOW PERMRN -�GCMPANYNAMpy "' ET SCWEn CITY' SEWER ZIP CATEGORY PAYS MGY) (M 0 p, (MGD) TYPE DU AUTOCHLOR SYSTEM OF 1-1-011 WASHINGTON,INc. "I W.ROMANDAVENUE SANTA ANA 92704 SOAP DETERGEN T LIFG 208 001. OOW 2001-BON BOW, 0. OPJOl DaII CPT,P r 121111 AMATION EOUIPMEM 157I MACNRTHUR -1-03) STR11CTUREa,ING. BOIII.EVARD COSTAMESA 916M METAL FINISHING PSNS 21 MROI 0271 MI-M 0.00011 0.0011 g0(H7 MI PxrAny 115a13 1-1-118 BA F INWSTRIES 1910 S.YALE ST. SWTA NM 92309 CSDOL 250 2.17 0.218 200LM (LOGIR OUXIA &GON EIMem MIier 125612 11-052 B I TECHNOLOGIES.II A200 BONRA PLACE FWERTON 82615 METAL FINISHING PSN$ 216 lY 1%2 MOt-20@ 0. 0006H II P-1 Mel, 33tl15 7-LOW lBvBRAUNMEDIGlW 25251,CGMNAVENUE INI 9261A 95PHARMACEUTICALMFG 36A 241.I 1151 2001-iSM 0. 0071 BNO EIMIM Meter 1325222 SlO& BASIC ELECTRONICS INC. 11311 MONARCH 6T, GARDEN GAOVE 92MI METAL FLOWING PINES 20 00603 014 20OL2W2 0.0O0 0.Bass Base ElAuwil Mils SIMI 51-006 BASIN MARME INC. NO HARBOR ISIANO ORNE NENPORT BEACH NEED CSOOC 2 (LAND GIN MM-2002 0=1 0=5 BOOM RvuFF Moose .111. aF"IO BFS2HWSIONCO. TOO)WESTERNAVE, GARDEN GRWE NMI CSOOC 25 10183 0.41 "t-ZW2 &OLD OWN OD13 CYy MWr 3NHs U22 CIXPOROME CF R 11-090 BEARING INSPECTION WC, OIL LOS MAMITOS Sam METµ FIN15HINGPSN$ 2 0Sd1 0.1532101-20O2 0.00011 0002 Or003 API.. .12 11-tb BECKLMN COULTER IND, AMO N.HARBOR BOULEVARD FULLERTd NMI METµ FIN15HINGPSEB 25 am, i. MIL 2 OLQI Oase Bass PI Meer 331516 2-1313 BUCK O)OOE INOUNRIES INC. IMSpMNGETHORPEPMK µ HEIM Bass, ELECTROPV.TMGAVOK 25 SAW 0 1625 2OOI-2W2 BOHN T000l get Coy Mae, JONI M71 E.LAPAUMAVE.STE. 2-L19) BCEIHG COMPANY-KW.271 2" AWMEIM WID 31M Ni FINISHING ASKS 25 Ob534 1.13M 2001.2012 SAINT 0.0069 BODS E6luenl MNer 34511 2-1-319 BRIGHT ARMOUR PUNTING 10SSCORTEGAWAY PUNGENT. BMW METµ FINISHING PSNS 35 1.6921 0019 2001-2022 goals 0. Ones P.MN> =613 11-1-021 BRINME HIXMSOILCOWP 19MOGOTHARDSTREET HUnnNOTCN BFIGH 92518 0SDOC as 2.1m B 20OL10te 0.005 am O00 S, 211111 2-1-226 BRISTMINWSTRIES sM EAST LAMBERT RD. BRFA KWI METAL FINISHING PSES 2 7655 131 20B1-2W2 0025 0. 0.1 ETuenl Me. 9=22 2-1-Ml BURLINGTON ENGINEERING INC. 2MWESTGRONEAVE. CRµIGE NMI METµ FINISHING PSHS 3 O.AN 0.1 M01-2W2 0.0M S 0.W2 City MMM BURROWS IND.OBA MINUTEMAN 1-1-021 PUMPING M2e$.HICKORY ST. SANTAµLA "I C$DOC 2 1.3M 000]12001-m 000 0 0W5 EMuenl MNel SI CR.C.RIM,INC. 1RS W..IPER.HWY. BRFA 92M1 METµFINISHINGPSN$ G 0. 21I01-2W2 G SOG) 003 CR/MI 2-ILB2 CADIWC PV.TNG IMIWSTRUCKAVENUE ORANGE 92MT METµ FINSHING PENS 2 1 BA 2001301y! O.WB 0. OW1 An MeW ELECTROPLATIN6RA Il-1-0p C ,AURUM INWSTRIES WC. 15611'LCONTNNER 4NE HUMINGTON BEACH BMI9 .1. 1. 0. M01-M03 0 0. OOYI CR/Mss,CAL TRCNICS CIRCUIT ING-SANTAI.t-0T! ANA 111 W.OVEA RO.,STED SANTAµLA 92)0) METµFIHISXINGPSH$ 2 0. O.1]I 2B]LMM OW3 0. 0W] Pe-MMs 'High ighleG Field Inc lCete6 10212002 9:21 AM Balch Discharge.MICH Is NPDES 2A Application Attachment 5-SIU9.KIn Probably an Inlermillenl Discharge. Page 3 ad 17 ATTACHMENTS NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY TOTAL FL04q DAILY DAILY INO.♦ INGUSTIN. SANITARY IND SA111TARY SANITA YI wow L9LLME. LUME ISGL tFLM gi-oW RV 'WWM FLOVI` COMP, NAM r B SEWERLP '• XS .�, `� -. ry•.G01 (NY) T'PE CKIF.CON3pLp].IED WATER 5$-0A13 PLIFUMCATKp n"T"Elsei %ACENM 9lB]Ofi]A9 CSDGI: 0.1 p.OY $Ip1-$W2 DealOAWO 0Cool C'N Mrr, 561e90 b1M8 CALIFORNU WSTOM SHAPES.AC. IME.TµWTWAY ANAHEIM SURDS METµ FINISHING FSNS $ 1.967 Si 2CO1-21IO2 0. G0.ro] OOOx LIry MCIer i 12 }t-152 CANNONEWIPMENTWESTINC. Insia"ONARCHED, GARpEHGNGVE 9$M1 METAL FINISHING PSN$ 1.81 0. 20in-$W2 S. 0= 0009]ProceSe Meter JJ2JYS 5}1.M3 CARAN PRECISION ENGINEERING 42M N.PµM STREET FULLERTW 92M METAL FINISHING PSNS .1 S 0.690 ZWt-21G2 0, 0.00$ 0002 P Meter .2116 }1LE0 CARGILL INC. SSO NORTH GIIBERT U. FIM1LERTON g251t CSOOC U,g] 0318 2WL20pU 001 0.001 ODn Gry Meter JtlY15 2-1-0g3 CMTELELECTRONICS 19i1{PETM1ARE PLACENTIA 92870 METµ FINISHING Pan 3.08 0.1 MONI002 DOl 0,000 0.01 Prccev Melw .112 CATµ WAGWADERS.AON,a Sl@I APP I300AMfgNMAV£ GAROENGRWE 92&1 ALUMINUM FORMING v 5,17 DAIN 2W1-UWU 0.01 0. son,Cr,~ M1316 $2.1-]53 LO VIDEOINC. 10091 CAPRµ AVE GMGEH GRG/E 9$Bi}19.'d METµ FINISHING PSN$ 0 0211 A01-2pO2 0. 0. fl. CIIy Mels 3NBt2 11-1LN CEMPI INDUSTRIES INC. I60]$WTHARO STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH 91 METµ FINISHING P5N5 3 omi 0 2001-UW$ OW$1 sm, 0 Pri Mal, 333515 2-1-IN CENTRAL POADER COATING 59J ERFLdiFA 61 93N1 EETµ FINISHING Pal 0 0 A01-$pO$ 0. sold, amid CRY Maier 'A!'Ug12 3.1.151 CENTURYIAMIMTORSINC, ttR21W]LIWOCOGpt ANAHEM 92101 EIECIRCPIATWG eem 31 SASHE ITIN 2UNSN2 0.01 am O CRY Maier 3SHN2 -1-1tl CHEEK ENGINEERING 6 STAMPING 1lMliMHKLIN AVENUE TATINN 92780 CSDOC GI am, 2001-2002 S00Q Seel OWH Fr ArAvsM. =116 144711 CHROMA SYSTEMS PARTNERS inn S.SUSAN ST. SNRA. "I CSOCC 1. 0 2DY1d0O! OSg] 0W3 D5606 Seem!Meler 3UI10 1-1VJ7 CHROME TECH,INC. 2310CAPECODWAY Sµ1TA AM 92](5 METµ FIMSHNG P5N5 31 2LWI p m2002 0. am 0,0008 Rrcese MN, 333813 $-H123 CIRCUITACCESS 116RN.MTAVM ORANGE 9288) METAL FINISHING PSN$ Se iNEENE Ot 21pb'= 0. 0000 Dean Cey Melw 134812 21 CIRWR TECH INC. 1911 NORTH MAN STREET ORANGE 92M MI FINISHING PSN$ 26 0n2e SIX 2Wl-2gO! 0.0011 0,000 0.001 Pe-Mtls 33411$ 2-1-133 CIRTECH NC. ]SIIE.EMERSCN GRANGE 92K5 METµ FINISHING PSNS SAI DA11 Ml-= 0,033 OW$ 0,0359 CP/Maiw 3NN2 CITY OF ANAIE M-WATER b14IT3 SERNCES U51 E.WNAUT GNYOR RD.ANANEIM g2g0] CS(i ].] 0. 20DI-20@ 0031 O.Wp1 Doer.EaRIAKlw Y11310 CID'OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIRE 114415 DEPARTMENT 190H HUNRNGTON Sam HUMINGTOX RFILX 9$6M CSDOC 2 0. 2W1-2W! 0.00 S 0 211111 CT'OF TUSTIN-MAINTENANCE ]-1-05R YMD tall SERNCEROAD TUSTIN 92]g0 CSGOC DA1 Real 0J1-200R 0.001 O.WN a.W1 Pre-MNx 58$119 CIIYKTVSTN WATER SERVILE -t-013 (1]H15T.) tgWlE t]IR SDIffT NSTIN 92]O$ Cd0OC ]R. O.W912W1-NO2 Olt 0. 021 EIMrY Meter Y213f0 CITYOF TUSTN.WATETI SERVILE ]-1-ZN DMNST.) 215 E.MNH STREET TUSTM 9T90 LSOOL 25 O.OW1 Lpt-UOpl 0.00e0.00W 00693 EIArt4WW E1310 'Highlighted Field Indicates 1WIiG0U2 9:21 AM BI Discharge,Which is NPDES 2A Application Attachment 5-SIUs.als Probably an Intttmibent Discharge. Page 4 d 17 ATTACHMENT NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS NAIL Y TDTnL Loll. WILY DAILY INE,T INDLI SAIJITARY IND SANITARY SANTA WVHM VOWME V.,PmE FISCAL FLOW FLOW RY -WWAR FLOW P[RMITN COMPANY NAME SEWER STREET SEWER CITY SEWER 21P GTEGORY DAYS MGYI (MGYI YEAR MGD) IMGO) MGDI TYPE SIC 2985 E.MIRAL@M AVE 9 2-1-I90 CLASSIC I'll ING INC. UAV ANAHEIM 9'EPA METAL FINISHING PSNS 26 1A185 3,1020 N01.2002 00151 0REST 0.0150 PVASM01x 1,19119 3.1-050 CLEUGH'S RHUBARB COMPANY 6220 DESCANSO ST. BUENA PARK 92620 CBOOC BID 11.0826 1237 2001-2002 0036 0.00e1 R.I1 CIry Mel.r 311411 3.1.167 COASTLINE METAL FINISHING CORP.TDIR PATTERSON DR. GARDEN GROVE 93M1 METAL FINISNINO PBNB Be LIS O4I3120012002 0.01B B.00Ii 0.021B CIry Mean =813 COCA- COLA GAUCHE WATERS 2.1492 ANAHEIM 2121 E.WINSTON RD, ANAHEIM 9MM CSDCC 29 10017 &NM 20013002 0.0401 0.00I1 0.0e11 E111uenl Male, 312112 CONTINUOUS OWTINO 24-290 CORPORATION MOVIESTGROVE ORANGE 82865 ELECTROPLATING e10K 1 32 ?MS9 0.M44 2001�2002 0.024 omau 0.0mo ElMenl MI 332812 3A070 COOPER AND BRAIN INC. 13M N.WE DR, BREA 92821 CSOOC BE W MI 1T.238 0, 81 T 200 M2 O. i 0. 9.0,12 EIh nl Me. 211111 COPPER CLAD MULTIUYER 2.14" PRODUCTS INC. 110 N.NAMCIR. ANAHEIM III METALFINISHINGPSNS 2 e.B 0. 9M1-9p2 0.01 0.000 0.0191 CAP,MOW SHH2 i-14411 COSMOTRONIOCORPORATION 15721 NEWS AVE. IRVINE 92M ELECTROPLATING>IOK 2V SM36 SAW 2MI-M 0.020 0.0022 0 0231 Cly Maier 334112 2.1409 CREST COATING INC. 1361 S.PLEBE ST. ANAHEIM 92NS METAL FINISHING PSNS 244 1.4917 OSN M,2502 STUDIO 0.00 1..1 CIry Meier W2812 765 WEST Si% EBNTN 8A002 CRITERION MACHINE WORKS STREET COSTA MESA 926" METAL FINISHING PEES 25, 01487 0,219 2801-26G2 0,0010 Blood 0001. Prrcnx Meier 333515 3.1A71 CROCKETTCONTMNERCORP. 6211 DESCANSOAVE, BUENA PARK mm GEODE 2M Beside 0.812 2C01.2W2 0.110041 0.002A 00024 BeN2l OBKIP aN']22211 1-1-051 CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 502 S.LYON ST. SANTA ANA 92705 CSODG 201 17A5M O.MS 2001-2032 O.M. 0,0002 0, Day Male, M1990 2-1.227 CUSTOM ENAMELERS INC. 18340 MT.BALDY CIR. FOUNTAINVALLEY 927H ELECTROPLATINGgOK MI 0.032 0312 2001-20(X2 0.001 DWI 0. Pmceee Meler 332812 CYTEC ENGINEERED MATERIALS 2-1A11 INC. 4440 N.KRAEMER BLVO. ANAHEIM 8280E METAL FINISHING ASKS 2S BAR 1.137 2001-2001! OPW2 Mm GOOD 325NO 2-1-243 O B S CUSTOM PLATING INC, 14552 ANABEL AVE. GARDEN GROVE MISS METAL FINISHING ASKS 2 BIN 0.13 200I.= O.OW D 0,00N M ISI W2813 3.1402 OAE SHIN USA.INC. 610 N.GILBERT ST.BLDG C FULLERTON 828M Mj 0,000 O52 2801.2W2 0. DMIS Seem Maier M3311 BLANCHE WATERS DA N.A.-SAWA 2Ad82 AM 1522 N.NEWHOPE ST. SAGA ANA 92i0J 2 36.C57 0.62 2601-XFl2 0.A55 0.0025 C,AM Pmreee MINK 312112 2-1039 DATA AIRE INC.F2 230 W FLUERIWE AVENUE ORANGE 92M PSNS G.00 0.32 2001-2N2 0.003I 0.001] BAGS EMuenl MMer NQUO 1AAQ DATA ELECTRONIC SERNCES INC. 41ON.NANTUCKETPL. SANTA ANA 92M PSNS 3.10 0.20E 2001-2W2 0.010I Rea 0.0111 CMy Mxer MH12 1-1M1 DATA GOLDEN SEANCES 3313 W.HARVMO ST. SARTAANA 922G PSNS 2 D.7N 0. 2001-MO2 OW2 0.000 0.002 P.Mebr 3t6112 OFAN FOODS CO.OF CA.INC,(ICE 3.1003 CREAM) MOOREGIOAVE BUENAPMK "M B.850 0.227 2001.1W2 I)SM 311510 'Highlighted!Field Indicates 1212002 9:21 AM Belch Discharge,Which Is NPDES 2A Application ARachment 5-SIUS Ia Probably an InlermiRent Discharge. Page 5 o(17 ATTACHMENTS NRDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS oMLY T01AL , el Ow, DAILY NHIIA-L Ian.. INV VOLUME SANITARY FLOW SALOW fiPNITA By WORK VOLUME VOLUME FISCAL LLGW .FLOW R 'WNLYLE :aY ofRMITNO COIA'PNY N;AI $f_WCR STREET SEWERCITY SCWGR ZIP G9TfiGGRV DAYS (MGY) (MGY) (YEAR IMGO IIMGOI (MGDI lYC[ lIi AN 1GOU51;G.01 LA.I f..IMILN ]-0.005 PUNT) EJW No MAGN1 BUENAPARK 1111B LAGOON 36 10 am 0e03 ]WF]W] 0.1]03 OWIP 0.121,p1ylAnlrr ]FISH 34L0B9 OEIPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS 11111 N.MAGNGIUAVE, ANAHEIM 9}901 BATTERY MFG Z. 109111 $3 ]WL;Ra 001]] OWM 005]I FIIWmI Meier ]]5911 SIC82 DERM COSMETICS LABS INC, S]]O ALTURA BLVD. BUENA PARK .20 SOARDETERGENTING m 0.0325 0.08 2ML2002 00002 OLW] 00001 EFANI MI 32WO 2-04)22 DIM MUM COMPANY,INC. ItOW.WALHUTSTREET ORANGE WSH CSDCC 210 1.3111 01 2001.2M2 0.00's, 0.FORM Oroom BFbA 91582991 ELECTRICAL& 5F-0BU JOBS TECHNOLOGIES INC. ]FGD E.MIRALOMA AVE.Rtl ANAHEIM 92803 ELECTRONIC 21 &.BBB 2.11 2 I.M2 I 002]] 05CBB 0.0324IONml Mew ]Ntl] 20*105 OUCOMMUNAEROSLAUCNRES IMN.BATAVN ORANGE 92885 METAL FINISHING PEES 27 2.613 OT 20013W2 1 o.come 0,00211 012 Eflaml Mebr 1 11 2.1.325 OUNHAM METAL PROCESSING DIN,RAMER ORANGE "aff ELECTROR NG.IM 25 FINSS 0.187 2001.2002 own 0.0008 0N]B CITY Meter =13 1-1dM DYE TECHNIQUE INC. 174H DERIAN AVE. IRVINE 92611 SECOND 19 20 HIT 0.13, 200I-M02 O.tdt dM7 O.t01B Cr"IN 313312 2.1-218 DYNAMICDETAILBINC. 1231 SIMON CIRCLE ANAHEIM ATI METAL FINISHING PENS 33 LM91 M-2002 0.1232 0.0182 0.13W INI MI 3NM2 2.1-229 DYNAMIC DETAILS INC.U 12MLANCELN. ANAHEIM 92806 METAL FINISHING PENS m 00378 G.UB 2001-200] Ohrol 0.0003 0000N PNKNa New 33N12 1.1a6A E P T FAST DUALITY BETACE,INC. 2]M S.SUSAN ST. SANTAANA 927W METAL FINISHING PENS 3 070151 0. 2001-2002 WX 000M O.AXBB9;tl7 i3I 2 61 EATON CORPORATCal 1NONDNROVIAAVENUE COSTAMESA 9M21 METAL FINISHING PEES 33 0.7297 1.139 20013002 OWN OMSI 0.I P.More, SY921 ECONCRUTE CL MPRODUCTS 2-1a INC. ] IL LAIIALIMAVE. ANAHEIM 92M6 METAL FINISHING PSES 23 Od4M 14M 20013002 gols DO (Loom PmgvW wm ]4ffi] EONAROS LIFESCIENCES LUC IMF RED HILL AVE. IRVINE 92611 METAL FINISHING PENS ]I 0.0021 TS00 2001-2002 0.0000 M0250 0.02M =112 ELECTRO METAL FINISHING III CORPORATION IIN N.GROVE ST. ANAHEIM 92e06 METAL FINISHING FINE 21 O.OIW 0.121 2001-2002 0.0.001 0.000 0.0006 3BG812 ELECTROPUTNGPM 7-1-1e2 ELECTROLURGYINC, 1121 OURYEA AVE. IRVINE 92611 +10K 8.m 0552 M-200I O.GD/ 0=1 0.035 CRY Mebr ]]M13 2-1436 ELECTRON PLATING Be INC. IM32 ENTERPRISE DR. GARDEN GROVE 92043 METAL FINISHING PENS 25 ].RI 0.100 2001Q002 0.0145 040061 0.014 Cry MAW M2813 ELECTRONIC PRECISION ELECTROPUTINGPM 2-L131 SPECIALTIES INC. us W.MERCURY LANE BREA 92621 Nq( 26 ].BONS) 0.181 2WL2W2 0,0300 Owls 0.031 Pr¢eN Mebr M2813 2-0L92 ELEOTRORACK PRODUCTS CO.INC. 1443 B.SUNKIST ST. ANAHEIM 920M METAL FINISHING PSNS 25 0352 OAT 2001-2002 BOOM DW19 0.003 P-.M.. ]]M22 Lt-082 ELECTROSERVICES 2000 INC. 13MWAKENMIAVE. SANTAANA mw METAL FINISHING PSNS SA 2.210 0.01 2001 040010 o.m III Gry Meier =812 1.14" EMSEEINC.41 21MS.HATHAWAY SAMAANA mu ELECTRGPLATIGIRM 28 FLINS 0.300 2001 odm O.MIt 0,01 an MI =813 1.1425 EMBEE INC.a3 21A89.HATHAWAY S APNA 97705 ELECTROPUTNGc10K 28 20.19 0.38 20012002 007I 0.0013 Ban SAY Mer. =013 'Highlighted Field Indicates IW21/2002 9:21 AM Balch Discharge,Whlch Is NPDES 2A Applicalbn AGachnDI 5.SIIL.KIe Probably an Inter miRenl Discharge, Page 6 of 17 ATTACHMENT NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY TOTAL LOVI. DAILY DAILY INO.� - INOUSTRIAL EANITAtY IND WITARY SANITA WDRK SVOLUME VCAUME Fie qL� FLO'N FLOW MY e .FLOW IEF.ITHC COInPANY NAME SEWER STREET kPSEWERCITY SEw£RZIP CATEGORY DAYS pP ' , 1'1M gYYFMAI (MGp W..) (AGO) TYPE SIC 1I"26 ENBEE!NC e] 2139 SANTA FE STREET SNIIAM'A 92105 ELECTROPLATING I ICR 2116 11 OAKIZ 2001-21p2 0.09 000I OBaOI Gry A•emr ]RBO ENGNEERWG PLATING 1-I409 CORPORATION 12N E. FOBgNA AYE. SANTA ANA 922% METALFINISHINGPSNS 210 GZr35 OWN ZVOI-2W2 OWIJ GOWKI 0 W13 Bair,Ds n, 3128I5 2-1-L3 EIRiRAVERS INK CO SABW.EYPLd1ER BREA 92921 No 0.own Sen 2Wt-2002 Soom 0.0001 0OWN GIy Meier ]I5910 1I.W3 ENTIDNEMC. IATA2 VON NARMAN AYE, SMINE B2W8 CSWC 25a 11521 GXM 2001-2102 &OON OWI2 OWSS ElMenl Meier MNAM 2-1d63 ESSIA GRWP INC. IOISN.PATTST. AMAI SNO3 DAON, SAO IWOR o 2001-2002 OWN 0.Sol 0.SON E1Nw11~ }]H22 E%CEILO CIRCUITS 2.1,831 MANUFACTURING CORP. 1$I NNgTAC51Clf PLACE. 92160 METAL FINISHING PSNS IS SA01 Oj3E MI-21Y12 0018 Goals OA191 CBy Meter 334112 114322 E%PO DYEING AND FINISHING INC. IM KNIXLNOCO CARL AHNIEW am, CS:OC As 117900 0,91 MI.2002 0 OWN OL3896 EIOM MN 213311 3-I417 EMILASRE DESIGNS INC. RH H,MALLEY ST.NaTY AN.WEW .1 META FINI5111NG PSHS m OXIS 09013 $001-2002 0001 OBWI O.WI PgpFF MAID Asian] FABRICATION CONCEPTS 1-1. CCNAORNRDN 1M E.ST.ANDAEW K. SMITA. 92205 METAL FINISHING PSMS as SAM 21 1001-I002 OWS OWN oonsacAymear, 332115 FAIRCNRDFASTEHEREFN.LERTON 2-Id61 OPERATING, AN,S.STATE COLLEGE BLVD.FULLERTON 92N13VA METAL FINISHING PSES 36 SON SAW 2W1-2N2 SON Gans 0O22 Eastern MNer ]222E FINELINE CIRCUITS A TECHNOLOGY 2A-121 INC. AAAAFOl10 BREA SNUI IETN FlMSImIG PSNSM IA33 SIX 2001-2002 ONE DW05 OWN CMMeler 33At12 2.1-M FOAMEXLV. 20SON.BATAVMSTREET dUNGE 92M5 GANG, 201 04n 1,141 2001-2002 ONO SOON 0004 ElAuenl Meier 326150 2A-I311 FR02SUN FOODS,AC. 166E.I JADLU %ACENTM ONTO CSDOC a 4AM1 0 2C01-2002 0017 SOON OLOIN Cry Meier Anw FU0.ERTpI CULTURES vVT:•' _ 2.1J 9 SFECMLOES TAM VIA BURTON FULLERWIN ANSI DANN as 26.665 OSA 2W1-2W2 0102 OW21 01.1 BSMI 311511 11400 FULLERTON RATING 200E RAYMER AYE.STE MAOFULLERTON AMMO, METAL FINISHING PSNS 0.0653 OWR 201 2W2 OW0 OLOWR 0=01 A—Maier Ai2512 1-1-251 WLIADE CHEMICAL INC. 1230 E.ST GERTRUDE RACE SANTA ANA 92202a030 C5000 I.ARS 0.01 N01-2W2 OWT a0001 OM76 Pmeess Meier A226. NpYERRWS METHS 2-1-In GI INI INDUSTRIES INC. 2311 S.R1l1AVJl ST. SANTA. series MAG 2 A 0 moon 2 SAID Smis OZOAEOuenl Meler ]]1492 GENERAL CONTAINER �` CORPORATION51 I2 CORPORATION 5000OOSAW. SUE.PARR SAD, GENIC o08i O 2001.21002 0 OM1 OMI D Eb`d y BAb%.I2Itln9e- 3:22II GEd1GE A ACHES,IMPENLLLI2 mismi 3-1-1R WELL 1M9E.EOLOp1AVE PLACENM 92520 CSDCC IS QWOA 2011-2002 a.NA OWN SINCE 211111 m4h(W GEOiGI W PACIFIC C0IPOPATKNA WCOREGK) SUE.MAIN 9aRa CSC 0 '.AT XA1-2W 02 0 O. b�OgUI�AA�!P 3n1I11 'Highlighted Field lockeetas 10Y2122002 9:21 AM Balch Discharge,Mich Is NPDES 2A Application AXachmant 5-SIU9.AI5 Probably an IntanniOenl DlsFhafge. Page 7 of 17 ATTACHMENT NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS ' rD)nL FLOW, 6NEMG oMLv DULv w0.• INDUSTRµ SANTMY IND SANITARY SANHA WORNVOWME VOLUME FISCU. FLOW FLOW RVFLOW P, EWER BiREEi SCnERC TY SEWERLPRY GAYS n� Yf• '.oTFARITO MGp1 GO) (MGD) TYPE 2� 512-0352 GOMIEONp:b.No 920ENTERPRUE TI!.1 CPA.-9E 9396] !:G PSNS 2B DA 0.01 MI-XIC2 D 0.111.3 GCODIS'IA COMPANY 1=1 MONARCH ST, GARDEN GROVE 92M1 1 0 2001-2W2 p OWI 00]T]EM IMAIN 225612 GORILLASPOLIBNING pN0 MTNG5Lid61 CORP. BNW.YOUNGSTREET SANTANU 9D05 NG PENS 0.161 D 2001-M p 0. 0. P-Me" .261] 11-09J GRMHIL PpCNpGING COflP. 7j1p VMP50N AVF. GARDEN GROVE 92&1 ZI 0 09 2W1.21M2 0 0. OW] BNtlI DYNv§8�yE12 2-1AV H.KOLN05CNSL0. 5L10E.LAPµ1MAVE, ANAHEIM 91 GISE3 THI 2W1-2W2 0 O.ONA 0.001 Plrceas MMw 3361 114417 N.B.OROPEMTX]N6 TRUST 1H IATHSTRET HUNTINGTMI BEACH 92W 0. G 2MI-2W2 0 0. 0.00 211111 3m140) WWSON{OpgN CO,.PI .0URALLERORLVD. SUE.PARK GRAN SOAP-DETERGENTMFG 2M am MOM 2001-2002 OW25 0.0001 0 son CA,MMer 30612 2-1-$16 HARBOR TRUCK SCENES WG 255VOYAGERAVE, BREA 9262t METALFINISHINGPSNS M 0071 DAM 2001-2002 0 Mao OWN 0.001 IN-Rest 338P0 1015 E.CPANGETIgNPE S8I HMRYS DYE 6 WASH INC. AWE. AAAREIM 92801 CSDDC .1 12.0. OL311 2001-2002 C 0312 OMIT GKQD IR IMMs 31.12 24-019 HARTS-HANKS SHOPPERS TWOMITERST, BREA 92021 CSDOL 3a2S 3064912WI*1W2 00109 DIR 0. Pvxf MAW 511110 2-1401 HARTWELL CORPORATION 900B.RILHRELDROAD PLACENTIA An" CSOOC 2 1, 1A] 2W1.2002 OGL4 a sose FI AMar ]yi22 2=1079 HAM INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120KARMNI ANAHEIM S26W INDUSTRNLLAUNgM M l)201 0.235 2001 2W2 0.0162 0.Mae0.0191 City MI 012352 Ma(W7 HLTECH STENCILS 2)b$,NARBgi BLWD.AB SAMAARA 92)OL METAL FINISHING PSNS 2 0= D.- 21 '-. DM 0W01 emal SI DIsdNA M;332122 HIGHTOWER"TING 6 2-1-IN 1MNUFAGTURINGLO. 2090KGIASSELL ORANGE SUNK 11 ELEGTROPIATMG NPw a 2+153 am 2MI-2W2 amM 0.0002 DOME EEAARI Metw M2813 II AMSON METAL FINISHING BID PRODUCTION III NEWPORTSEACH 92E63 ELECIROPIATING e10( M 15511 DAN 2001-2 0.05114 GOOD 0.060AT CIN NRRY .13 HOUSE FOODS AMERICA lIV2 CORPD4ATON .1 ORANGEMDOD AVE DANGER GROVE .1 CSOL fi�4 a" .1-2002 0 0. 029] FI1luenl MARY ]11222 HNATT DIE CASTING B METAL MOLDING Is =: N'^i. - lI.2M ENGINEERWG CORP. A656 DNCOR AVE CYPRESS "Goo CASTING OA1 MD1-2W2 0.009 0.W310012 GAIT OANOi, g23 BI I L N PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 33M HYLND AVENUE COSTAMESA 9MM CSOOC 2. 2W1-A9Y D 001 0MA SAIA D6d>p!,$1102] IP G Cµ FLUX ING. 120 N.NNOL4V000ak ANAHEIM 9MD METµFINISHINGPSNS 03] 2W1-2W$ 0.00 OWI 0W] C.,AN.IDEµAYCOILNGANQ 1360M12)O H.BLUE GUM SO ANAHEIM Some METµ fINISHING P$X$ O.A MD1dlM3 0. 0.001 0Pt1 Lily MeW IDEµUNIFORMRENTµSERVICE iN11ABETIER WAY GARDEN GROVE 92NQ INDUSDRMLIAUNORYD2A] 2W1-2W2 0 am, OW6I COY MNY 2A-068NCANAIEIM Seem CSOCC 021 2W1-2W2 0. aml OW1 PlvumMaly 2-1J96 IMPERW,MTWC IM N.BATAVIA 0SANGE 9286) ASTµMIMNGP0 2W1-LI02 am I OWt ---MA--- 'Highlighte l FMDI Inlficales 10.21/2002 921 AM Balch Discharge,Which Is NPDES 2A ApD9calion ADactsa eM 5-SIUI Plobabg an IrAINTR 0epl DIMU alga. Page 6 DI 17 ATTACHMENT NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY TOTAL FLOW, 04" UAILY IND INDUSTRIAL SANTARY NO SANITARY SANITA WORK VOLUnIE VOLVME .FISCAL FLOW .IFLOW 0.Y 'WWnR FLOW PERMIT NO COMPANY NAME SEWER STREET SPrvER CITY SEWER LP CATEGORY DAYS � tMGY) (MGv) YEAR MGD) i GDI (MGDi TYPp SIC 21<OI INDrpENDENi FORGE EY$N_SATAVIA ORANGE 9ROfi0 ALUMINUM FORMING $ 0.1@J 0]0002001-2C@ OJM01 O.W12 O.W Ifi Pt¢n^v lJnlrr 12112 2-1 SYN INTEC PRODUCTS INC. IIRSN.SPRIEST. ANAHEIM 92906 CENCI 2 1R., 0.15J 20014W2 0.01T 0.0006 DOIB1 City V," T-1-055 INTEGRATED AEROSPACE,II AN E,DYER RD, SAMAM•A 92ID}STtT METAL FINISHING PSES 0.070 IA 2GR-= 0.0002 0.0051 0 W52 Orldl DI;cwrpn ]30RI3 IRMNE MNCH WATER DISTRICT- 1-1-0TS DATE 1TW W.SEC#RSTROM SANTA ANA NERRI CSWC Sees 76.82T 0.0163 2001-M 1 0.2105 0.0001 02ID Ell-I Meter 221310 ELECTRICAL 7-1-03t IRMNE SENSORS CORP. 3WI REDHILL NI AVE.}10B COSTAMESA SUER ELECTRONIC 0.2 0,1 n0 21.2W2 0.001 0. O.MI x PMSe Meter SUT10 ITT GNNON A DMSION OF HIT 1-1-210 INDUSTRIES BOB E.DYER RD. SANTA 192SPI COPPER FORMING M .,OGQ 8 2001-2002 ILIM 0.0249 MOW 33MI? W N.EUMID WAY BLDG. 2-1d14 J B H DEBURRING INC.p2 H162 ANAHEIM 92801 ELEQROPIATNG.IUK M 1.RN 0.1 20 I-= 0.00N 0.0007 UOUXICIty Meld =812 24410 J K L MANUFAMIRING HNC,42 1211 N.LIS BRISAS ANAHEIM 92M METAL FINISHING PENS SIR 0.1171 &M 20 i.= o.00sm OEM DiDOOMPreememMatv 33M12 bIdIB J-TNON INC. 512 E.CENTRAL PARK AVE. ANAHEIM 92002 ELECTROPIAPNG<w 24 0.2DING Doom 2031-2Ce2 ORION0.01102 OM10 Clry Meter 334O12 ELECTRICAL& ST-t-292 JAEaEMICONDUCTOR 4311 JAMBOREE ROAD NEWPORT BEACH 92660 ELECTRONIC SIR MA391 5.81159 2001 0.187 0.0161 UKI36 EMxnt Meter 33,M13 JEFFERSONSMURFR 7-1-009 CORPORATION(us.) 1500BARIMNGPARNVJAY IRJINE 92M PSOOC 2 4=4 1.7680 2001-2002 0.018 O'Dome afu3c CXy Mew =Q 2.1NO2 JELLCO CONTAINER INL, 1151 N.TUSTM AWE, AMAHFJM 9A102 CSOCC 2 4.053 0.e1 2001-2W3 OBIR 0,0011 0.0172 GM Mew =12 }1065 JOHNA.TROIMI HOUR EAWARDS STREET NEWINGTON BEACH 928M CSDOC SIR 9e112A 0. Hpid002 0A7U 0.0000 0.175elE@xnt Mew 211111 2-1-385 JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY HI 1550 E.KIMBERLY FULLERTON 92WI BATTERY MFG 26 ...Is 1.6811 2001-2W2 0,03 0. O.dOt EOmnI MMx 335911 344026 KCAELECTRONICSINC. 223 N.CRESCENT WAY AMMEIM 92801 METAL FINISHING SIGNS 1 351 25A07A0Ao 2NL2002 U072e BOOST D Eswrt MON 33MR 2-1J59 K C A ELECTRdJICS,MG TII FEE ANA STREET PLACENTA 928m METAL FINISHING PSNS 2 0.W6SON 2002 0.032 DIXON0.00 CHy Meln lSN12 }1-0BB KUATEKTILES HNC, B301 MIRE&A BLVD. BUfNAPARK 50821 C6000 M.31B21p1.2002 0.0921 0. 0.O951 EIIMxni Mew 313311 2-1-1Tt KENLEN SPECIALITIES INC. 11891COLEY MR DR. FOUNTAIN VALLEY 92T09 METALFINISHING PSNS O.N2001.2002 0.0dH 0. 0.0021 CRY Mew =12 PULPFAPER- 2-1d25 KIMBERLYGCtAflK WORLDWADE.INC. 2001 E.IXUNGETHONPE FULIERTON 93BJ1 PAPEgBOARO AOT. 2W1.31M2 1,1 O.Om 1,1302 EIMMMew 3Y2121 KINSBUflSKY BROTHER55UPPLY 2.1424 1NC. 131e N.ANAHEIM BLVD. ANAHEIM WWI SMOGS --S2 1-2W2 0. DDOH 0.0051 Eei Mew SBYL11 'Highlighted!Reid Indicales 1 W2112002 9:21 AM Balch Discharge,Which IS NPDES 2A Application Atlachment 5-SIDs.ds Probably on Inlermifh:nt DISAlerge. Page 9 of 17 ATTACHMENT NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY TOTAL FLOW, DAILY DAILY IHD.. INOUSTNAL SANITARY - IND SANITARY SANITA WOIM VOLUME VOLUME .FISCAL FLOW FLOW BY -WWAR FLOW 1EI1MIi N0 CCIAVANYNMIL M1VM 11 SNIEFT SEWER CNY� 11 WIN 2I1 CATEGORY DAYS MGY) (MC') YCAF 111,C) (MGD) (MID) TYPE GIC ]-I-Vn .OP1OI11111 vHLSSS, (SDOG JIF 195510 I'll 10p4>Otp IEI UCIAn Bpl]P IIUY A4�Igr 121211 RUIRYFA ]WI AR BOY HIA e]p21 31mDO KNOITTSROCESSIN LANE 18150 Or BOYSENBERRY SYLANE FOUNTAIN 92RN)7M CSDOC 2 1a.95 0 ISBEW25 p001.2. BAISP 0.00] BAIOP EffluONI IM<I<r JI1421 m, 2-.26 KOOAKPROCESSINION 1217E. E.AWMREET FWNTAINVµLEY 82105 METAL 559N 05a2 200U20@ ODIa O.C@ 0015 ON Haler B4S31 D1N30 KRYLERIFORM SUPPLY 121)E.ASXAVENUE fULLERTCN 92031 METAL FINISHING P$NS 2 3.598 0.1 21101-30M 0.01 0.000 0.015 Gty MRx Sl2H] L 6 N UNIFORM 6VPPLY CO.,INC. 1-0N2 (CLEAN) 191 E.EOINGE0.AVENVE WITAANA 93205 INWST111µ LAUNDRY 2SE 0.0572 043002001.2002 0.0002 0,0017 B00H GMMFIx 612332 11-200 ILA MORA PLATING CD INC. Mee.OWRES3 ILA,HbRA JELECTROPLATING'R0K 261 2.03 0 03N 2001.2IO2 OMI 0 0.COSE Rams Male, 1332813 tA-0<9 ILAM LIGHi1NG II MEN S,FNRNEW ST. SANTA µNA 91313, METAL FINISHING PSNS 31 DISS 0.505 2C01-2M2 D. OM21 0SO PmuxlMx =122 1A-03A LAMSLATE TECH INC. 520 E.GOETZ AME. SANTAAM 52102 METAL FINISHING PSNS 2 cm 0025 2C01.2W2 0 B.Otlt OWJI Pmuu MNw 3JN12 24433 LEACH INTERNATIONAL 11NOVMHORMWAY ANAHEIM WOM METAL FINISHING PEES 30 1.Y1 0 2001.2502 0.0261 0.000 0W7 CIry War 332513 3-1-20 UNCO INDUSTRIES INC. 528 W.CENTRAL PARK AVE. ANAHEIM NO02 "DOC 25 2.<ON 0.03322C042502 00111 O.WOt 00112 CIN MFler W2812 LINDBERG HEAT TREATING CO 11.120 ALUMATHERM T17I GARDEN GROVE BLMD, WESTMINSTER am CSDOL 3.77 O02 2001.2002 001d 0W1 0012 GMMaIx 132813 ELECTRICALS 11-001 UNFINIW MICROELECTR IN INC. 11052 MARKON OW GAROENGROVE am, ELECTRONIC 30. O53 2001.2M2 0. O.N1 0MTN ca,MNx 331 11d9 LOG,GRAPHICS,INC. 1T592METIIERUNE HUNTINGTON BEACH SENT METAL FINISHING PSN4 am ODN 000,2012 O.OW1 0. 0, ClI MXx 331412 LOS ANGELES TIMES 14-021 COMMUNICATIONSLLC 1315 SUNFLOWER AVENUE COSTA MESA BOOS OSOCC EWT 2.8891Hg13102 0.013 ON] 0021 Plxen Male, 511110 D1029 MLPFOODS INC. 4349.ATCNISON Si. ANAHEIM 92805 LSDOC N IB1 691 20JL'20J2 OOSN 10,002 OOSBI ETuenl Meter 311942 2.1.28, M T B MICROELECTRONICS INC. 14570 EISENHOWER OIR, JANUFFERM 92501 METAL FINISHING PAIRS 28 O.W1 am 2001-2003 U0410.� 00.VN BNMI J]N13 114-007 M.B.BELLOWS .MCFADDEN AVENUE HUNTINGTONBEACX92&6 METAL FINISHING PSES 2 O.ON 0.11 2101-202 0. BNdI IDUq 53-0d01 MAGNETIC METALS CORPORATION 37SW.UPALIM AVE. ANAHEIM 92001 METAL FINISHING PENS 0.1 OS '2W13N2 OCOT1 BMBi ]]L'11 2-0AIB MARCEL ELECTRONICS HE. Sb W,MISTMUNE ORANGE B2Ba5 METAL FINISHING PSNS 17. I.J550201=2 0.071 CIN war .412 Mo0ii WA RETS TEXTILE SERVICE INOI. WMFORONAM AVE. SANTAANA 9370N CSGOC 30 814 036222W1-1OJ2 00282 GO,MXx SIMll mJ0411 MARMUNDIANUFAONBIBRAINC. 1111E.MCFADDENAVE. SAHTAANA 82705 METµ FINISHING P8N8 E011 1.20a 20o1-2M2 0.021 PmuFFMp 31281] 11-021 IMRUCHAN.INC. RKGOEEREAVENUE IRVINE B2pM CSOOC 2 13 1. 2M1-Bead 0.0521 GIyMq 3118231-1-2U MASK TECHNOLOGY INC. MO13.MM S'T. SANTAAM ODD? METµFINISHINGP5N5 2 071 SA M1-2W2 0. MHw 31112 'Highlighted Field Indicates 10/21/2002 9:21 AM Batch Discharge,Which Is NPDES 2A APDlicallon Attachment 5-SIUEFIF Probably an IntalMOent Discharge. Page 10 o117 ATTACHMENT NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS TAIL, TOTAL ty FLOW. DAILY DAILY IND, "I tQOUSTRIFL SANITARY IUD SANITARY SANITA t WORK VOLUME VOLUME FISCAL 110W -FLOW RY 'WWAR FLOW PE .N COMPANY NAME SEWER STREET SEWER CITY STAII CATEGORY DAYS *MGYI .. iAMGY) YEAR (FACE MGDI (MGD) TYPE "I 344ni MEAD CALKAGING A 00 VALLEY VIEW ST, BUENA PARK PUSH G,,LC 33C 332M 1,64592ML2M2 DOUN 0,W51 O O I S I FRI DlsUingo 112211 71451 MEDTRONI6 HEART VALVES,INC. IPO E.DEERE AVE. SANTA ANA 92105 CLDOL 36 3"2 3 6 2001#20B2 00106 00101 LIMA I--Maier .11d!110 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER 6.1{02 DISTRICT I3M GISLER AVE. COSTA MESA 9me CSDOC 35 OEM 0,0000 2001-2d12 DD.2 D 0.0262 Effluent Meier 221310 METAL ROMER PRODUCTS- NONFERROUSMETALS 2.14M ANAHEIM SSOB E.LA PALMA AVE. ANAHEIM 92807 FORMING 24 1 an O.409 2001-2W2 0.001 0.0011 OLOOSE A..Meier U2117 ELECTRICAL& 1-1-235 IMICROSIUMUCCRE. 2830S.FMRNEWST, ISANTA ANA 9VN ELECTRONIC 254 2717901 3.14E 2001-2102 0.1070 00124 0.1193CINMeier ISSI 2-1453 MICROMETALS INC.02 MIS E.IA PALMA AVE, ANAHEIM 01 METAL FINISHING PSNS 29 81 1.0601 20014002 0023 aOR16 0,091Pmyn MUAR 31HID 2-0-076 MILBANK WEST INC. 151 S.PAGE COURT ANAHEIM 92908-5801 METAL FINISHING PSNS 25 IA 0937 2001.20I BOOM O.W]B 0.0092 PCPRR Meer 335101 WA-T<B MILENIUM CIRCUIT SERVICE CORP. 1210E.GENEAUTRYWAY ANAHEIM gales METAL FINISHING PENS 31 0.17 00702200Y2002 &0008 O.Q.-02 O.OWBCIOMeer 33H4 16131 GOTMRD STREET. 11-1-0]t WLLETT INDUSTRIES SUITE) HUNTINGTON BEACH SHUT METAL FINISHING PEES 25 0.371 023752004aWa ROPIS 300 0.002d Pro—Meer mms 2.1-714 MONOGRAM SYSTEMS IM E.VALENCIA DRIVE FULLERTON 92831 METAL FINISHING ASKS N I.m 2.801320U"2002 OLOA6A OOtll 0.0185 Petrov Meter 331413 2A481 MORAVEKSIOCHEMICµSINC. 522 MERCURY LANE BREA 92021 CSDOC 25 DOW SAM 2WEM2 00022 nWU BLOODY BYWI ON 325,13 2-IJT MULT-FINELINE ELECTRONX INC. 1301 N.DYNAMICS ST. ANAHEIM 92M METAL FINISHING ASKS 36 12611] 20ttd200L2002 0,0151 ...SO OM09 CII,MMer 3M112 2-14W MURRIETEA CIRCUITS INC. 476I EJNNTER AVE, ANAHEIM 92W METAL FINISHING ASKS n SLASH SOME 2D01.2002 0.0100 DOME) O.M23 GO,Meier 3SH12 ORGANIC CHEMICALS- 21-505 NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY 2201 E CERRITOS AVE. ANAHEIM 92" PLASTICSSYN SO 2.6,7 cases 2001-20M2 0.0073 0.0007 DCOSO EMuent Meier U5211 7-04)30 NEWPORTCORPoMTWN 1791 DEERE AVE. IRVINE 92M CSDOC 25 DDOO Id95e 2001 2002 OLOODS OLOOOI O.CH1 Pmcev Meier 33NUS 1-1AN NEWPORT METµ FINISHING INC. 3230 S.STANDARD AVE. ISANTAMA 92205 1 METAL FINISHING RUNS 2 (LSaH 0.91412WL2002 DOONS 10,001 OOO62EI0uent Maier MU13 S7-1-293 NEWPORT PRECISION OATES 1931 DEEREAVENUE III 92M CSDOC a Odm 0,52M 20OR2002 OLOODO S0c2 0.002 DOI Meier 33331d 2-15H NOLLAC OIL COMPANY 932 GOLDEN AVE. PLACENTIA 92M CSDOC 1.862 OL 20313002 O.WU Q O.00U BMC1des"' I1"211111 2-03U NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO.INC.(MMN)1228 AL OLNE ST. ANAHEIM 92MI CSDOC 1 MILKE Od]132W1-2002 0.11 O.Na O.IWd EMuent Meier SM21 NOR-CAL BEVERAGE Mw I 2-14M (TETRA) 1226 N.01 ST, ANAHEIM 92MI CSOOC 3 24,16 0.63132W62W2 O.OH OOO2 0 .CE2 EMuenl Mel, 312111 L 2- Yl NU-TEC POWDER COATING 29M E.BLUE STAR ANAHEIM 92" METAL FINISHING PSNS 28 0A]W 0.07802W1-2W2 O.W1 OL 0 .W21 CIN Meier M2812 a-19B1 NUEAD ENERGY COMPANY(BREA) 500 N.KRAEMER OLVO. MESA III C600C 30 L 0.102 2W1-2W2 OL W O. D 0 000. EMuenl Molar 211111 11-1413 NUM ENERGY COMPANY(H.B.) 45N HEIL AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH 9t549 CSDOC 36 DUMB 0.018 200110Q2 Sears O.WIIt O.Wt EMuenl Meer 211111 'Highlighted Field Indicates 10/21/2002 9:21 AM Batch Discharge,Which Is NPDES 2A Application Attachment 6-SlUs As Probably an IntermiBent Discharge. Page 11 Of 17 ATTACHMENT NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY ORAL FLOW, SAL DAILY INS . INDUSTRIAL SANITARY DID SANITARY SSNITA WONK VOLUME VOLUME 'FISCAL FLOW FLOW RV 1lWAR FLOW P[RMIi NO COMPANY NNAE SEWER STREET SEWER CITY SCALER ZIP CATEGORY DAYS IMGY) (MGY) YEAR IMGDI "(MGD) (SOL) TYPE sic 1-116 O.C ALPHANETICSINC. 2102 W.CHESTNUT AVE- SANTAANA "q LR LIFTALII.IS111NGP5NS YPT 1 1,1660 L111L 1.1-1.2 ..It 0.00YP 0.0<S3 Gary Mnlm 111112 1-1109 OLYMPIC POWDER COATINGS INC. 2]3]S.GARNSEY ST. SANTA ANA 92]0] METAL FINISHING PANS 26 0619] .32 OXR-202 0 002< O.OY1 OW] PIcm55 Meter 332812 2-1S20 Sees METAL FINISHING.INC. 11B05LCLEYRNERCIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY 9D00 fLELTRfIPUTING+tdL 10.1its O3M1205N2002 0.039 scale 0.0,112 Go,Meter 332813 1-1-070 ORANGE CONTAINER,INC. HIM E,MCFADDEN AVE 9MITAMU SZT00 MOOS 251 D2405 004M 2031-2032 0. (1 0.0031 Pram.Meter 3DI12 GRAIN GE COUNTY METAL 2-1-MO PROCESSING 1]11E.MMBMY FULLERTON 9XM ELECTROUUTING-IGK m 11.587 am 2001-2W2 seats OMIT OI69 Gry MMm 338399 24"535 ORANGE COUNTY PUTING CD..INC.950 N.PARKER STREET ORMIGE 92W ELECRiLPLATINGNW( 25 1.210 0.125.M1.2M2 0.01 L001 001. City Meter .1113 2-1-M PC A INWSIWES.LLD 1]2BE.ROS6LVFMAVFRUE FULLERTW IG&M METAL FINISHING PSES 36 13.1d OAH 2W1. 0.One p.M 0M9 EfARnt MNur ]]6]W MJfl PCEINOUSTRY.IIIC. 158EA5T I.WBERTROAO FULIfRTON 52615 METK FINISHING PEAS 2 2.015 0. 2p11-Hq2 O.M01 0.CN1 O.COB Prawn MOW-3N113 2F1-0]0 PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNWOGY,INC. 1B]S 6.SANTA CRV2M ANAHEIM 92M5 METAL FINISHING PSN$ 20 O.M 0.M]I HpNXg2 O.M11 O.MOt O.MI Pr�e9 Meer ]]Ii12 M-015 PACIFIC UTILITY PRODUCTS INC. ]]M MELNLLE WAY ANAHEIM S2B08 METAL FINISHING PSNS 3 03811 p.113 ZMN2M2 0, p.W31 O.001 PrlKeee Mole ]]5311 PALMRDHUGHES INTERCCNNECT ]-1-95 6VSTEMS 1)1$O VGNIURMMI IMINE 82611 METAL FINISHING PfiE6 N 32.W1 1936 ZML20@ 0.1 p.M] 0.40 EMwnl Meter ]]SIB LIJ19 PAYTON TECXNd.WYCStP 1]pBSB NEWNOPE STREET FOUNTAIN VALLEY 92]M METAL FINL9HING PSN$ 103311 1 IM131M3 0.0 O.M] 00.]61 EPIuanl Meer 3JM19 3.1."s PEPBFCOIASOTNNGGRWP SZBI CABALLERO BLVD. BUENA PNIX SIGNS CSOCC 2]. 0.02 2M1-2M2 D.09 O.M2 0.M5 Soluenl Meer 312111 2.141. PERFORMANCE PGNCER,INC. 5]S N.SATAMA STREET ORANGE 92863 METAL FINISHING PSNS OS31 0.1 2M1dM2 O,M OAM D.M2 Pr¢eee Men SGS12 2-0SB] PICOFAMOINC. 2]]-0N.EUCLIO WAY ANAHEIM 93M1 METAL FINISHING PSES 0A 0. 2M1-IMI O.M O.Mi OM]B CIry Meer 33NL 3-"15 PILKINGTON AEROSPACE 12122W MRNAVE GARDEN GROVE 92&1 CSDLC m 2 mRm O.MI (L 0. P.Mel. 335N13 1-1-M PIWEERCIRWRS b10S.SHAINONST. SANTA ANA 9P01 ELECTRWUTNGAIOK 8 a. .1. 11.M2 O.M3 0 Ciry Men STMtt 2-1JBB PUTECCRP/3.INC. IYY3 N.BATAVIASIREET OPPNGE 52�] METAL FINISHING PSNSjJ0 .583 Mt-2M3 0. 0M O.ON Gy MNtt ]]]B1] PLEGEL dL CSAPANY tBIATTNFR. 2-1-Im HA.) 18001 RUMSSI ST. YORBAIINDA 92088 CSDDC O 20]N2032 0. 0. 0. E1MeulIwI-M PLEION CORPORATION a 11W6.UM/IOOD SANTA ANA 82]OS METKFINISXING PSNS0E32 =,= 0.011 O.M2 0D1] PIeA iMMn2,ISR POYDFRLMTSEIMCES INC.St 3pT N.EULLID WAV BLOO.E ANNIEIM 93W1 ELECTNOPLARNG110K0.131 M1.2002 0.W1 0CW O.WI Pcaaee Mebr -1.12 3A. 3 PONDERCOATMETALFINGHINGPSXSDA31 A01-AW 0. O. O. cie MeM6EIMMSN O WKELICLNWAYSLDG,J EIM B3W1 BETALFINISHWGPSNSODT 2MISIMN 0. 0. 0.000 Cfly Me. 3t2B12 'Highlighted Field Indicates 1 M21]2W2 9:21 AM Batch Discharge,Which Is NPDES 2A Application ABachment 5-SIUs.K15 PmI]aWy an Intermittent Discharge. Pap 12 of 17 ATTACHMENTS NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY aO OFer ouLr TOTAL 1110 NL SANII .. IND SPNITARY SANITA 'AgNK ,pV�OLUME `VOLUME` -FISGL;. FLM `FLOW . I�ITY 'WlagR FLOW PERMRN "-COMFMIVNMIE SEWERSTREET Sn;;ER GAY SEWERD, CATEGORY DAYS yy YIY wAYFAR_; t .L CD) 1 IMGD TYPE 5'L ' 1]0 WIINCO N AVE ILCG T-1L]A POWDERCOAT SENWCES INC.R LISL2 WWI :I LI N51'.G PS':5 2W a" eases M1.2002 0.0009 base OOOII City 1-1-2N FORMER CIRCUITS,INC. TMSCROODVWp SANTA ANA RRM METAL FINISHING PSN$ 305 219 3moc TWL2WT 0..' 0j01V 0.01129 City mole, JY<R 1-1-TSS PREGOUSMETALSPATING 2 SY CFVNNC£ST. SMINTAMA W701 METµ FW49BNGESINS 255 0851 sales 2E01-Nee 000N 0 0. Pless;Melar 332913 PRE CISION ANOOIDNG ANO 2-15)5 PILOTING INC. IN,N.MILLER ST. ANANEW WWI$ ELECTRCPIJ0`sK IOK We 32.3`7 MAIN MI-2W? IVIIN stage olummelow 332913 ILI O JIFIRECISIONCIRCUDSNESTIol JJIONEST NARVARO Sf. SNRANM 92]OtJYP METµ iMSNNGP5N525q 0.175 DXQ 2001-21DOZ I DNIR ovocu am PiMeM 3iM12 1005EdUHfEIiIpFPE 141 PRECISION PNNRNG 12M SHAMAN W70 ELECIROTATNG eINS 01 0317 11p1-Tp2 0. 0. Oeas OR,Mew 3II312 1-1-Z/I PRECISION RESOURCE,MIG WC. 12JS E.NORMNIDV PLACE $AF]TA µM 92]Gs METµ FINISHING P5N5 0090 061913tl11-TtlQ 0. O 0. CJy Now 12912 PRECISION RESOURCE.CALIFORNIA I1-1LB1 O'ASONRECON 3131 ENGINEERFAN-Us NUNHEIM BF/GX 92m CSOOC t] 1 2 I.= ON 0. 001 CRTPoe Mew b2F10 3-IEBI PREUITEXIL. ]I31E.LAPµ1MAYE. aUENAP1 seem CSOOC 0,17 0.11 TI0I.2002 00]0 00.0 OM11 Gry Mew 333515 3.1-030 PRIMA TE%INOUDGIMOFCAINL 52J]DESGNSOGRGE COSTA PARR 909A CSDOC 2 11.01 am ml-i0rQ Car 0. OUT Gry Mew 313311 -1-030 PRIMETECNNOLOGIES,INC. ]1&Ifl EONIEND ROADS COSTA MF$A 92029 METµ FINISHING EPENSses al. 0. A01-2W2 OWS RoNe OCD C9y Mew IDYl2 -1d PRINTRGII%.INC. 11590 MYFORDNTR IRVWE Wee METAL FINISHING PENS ]e 1I5 1.61 21Mly. 0. 0. 0W) EWrtM Melt 33M12 2-1559 PR0.TECN 1=1 VWNG RNERAVE FOIRIMNVNFEY V$]OB METµ RNISHINOPSNS 1121 1361 MI.= O023 &DON 0. Plaeee Melt 31W12 -1-2]5 PRUDENTML OVDUCTSWPLY 189pl ASTON ST. fNB1E 92605 WWSTRIAL LFUNDRV 2 5. 0. 20m-2CO2 0112] OW 0.025 Process Melw B12]E PURECNEM PRODUCTS CGAPANY 3.1-1Ni INC. War MGall PPRESSE ORANGE WNT SOUMRNUM FORMING MFG 0 0.09 2C01-2CO2 0Wte 00.21 O004 EffivertRPMPM Melt 325E=111 2-13W CAUJIµUMIWMle.FORGE B11 N.LYPRESTREETT WN, µUMINUMFORMING 31 0. 041 2W1m2W2 OW2 OW2l 0W1 D.Melt =111 2AJ1J WALITYALUMINUM FORCE RO X.Ipp151REEf 9299] µUMIN1IM FORMING 31 O.W1 0. 2W1m2WT D. DWI OWt EIIAreIll Melt ST3111 1-1-013 RBCTRNISPGRmMAMN:SCORP 131W.SEGERSINOMAVE SUN IU 91 METµ FINISHING PSES r 0 10.67MI am 0. 0.00 F-e Melt SMS13 2-t-2]S R T I ELECIRGOCS,INC. IML .BURTCNBT. ANAHEIM 92M CSWC Om2 H OWT . WJUDS &1-tb RNLIMI0:0.5.INL. B61 W.18fM S(RHT C0.5TA MESA 9M2] METµFWL9UNGPSN.S 0 2 OOSdEFWi3-1OM (8NCERO NSOCVPIESS NIMBRA 90N1 CSDOL ] O1 OW CHy Mein 311012 1-t-2]5 REIDMErµFINISHING 3110W.NMMD.UNR11 SANTANN WPM ELECTROPLATWG 1fOK 212, 2 0.01M Pee)-1-0b REVERE TPANSWCERS.WC. 111a2FRAHIWNAVEHUE TUSTN WWI) METµ FW510NG P5N5 0 eed BOtliDWINfe$J311t9 'Highlighled Field InEicales 1021/]W2 921 AM Batc]l Discharge,W111Ch Is NPOES 2A Application Attachment 5-SIUsAs Probably an Inert nitlent Discharge. Page 13 of 17 ATTACHMENT NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY TOTAL ,]y��r FLOW, GAILV .ONLY IND INDUSTRIAL SANITARY INO $/JIITARY $AM1ITA �.' WORK 4➢LUME LUM Fl FLOW ]FLOW I 'WHINFLOW PERMIT�i L.IP��:LOMPAHYNAy� �n,4E6EYA2Rb1gE yiSENE0.CITY SEWER LP CATEGORY DATE 1'jl r,�j\'FAfl#r GO �I GDI (L6DI TVPf 5'C ]-imOOS RILON ELECTRONICS AT 23N REDHILL AVE. SANTA ANA alas soOC 1.)a5 0X3 2W13W2 0 RR}3 -Wit RICOH ELECTRONICS INC. 17482 PULLMAN ST. IRVINE SISU METAL FINISHING PSNS 2 AS) 0. NMt-20J2 00171 000]9 0.021CCiry Me4r v 222812 2.1-iBl RICIFLUWCHNMOGY INC. IIN N.GROVE V. ANAHEIM 92. METAL FINISHING PSNS 2) 0.7 0. 2WI.2W2 om 0. 0.G.'CRY Meier 2."2 IIA-IN RI INDUSTRIES.INC. SING COMMERCIAL CHIME HUNTINGTON BEACH S2&9 ELEGTRCPIAN <lMt 0 0.1 2W1-2E02 0. 0. OWM COY Meter JJY12 b1y12 ROT0.gE COMPANY ING. 712 N.VALLEY ET.-ETE.A6B AIUXEIM 92801 METµ FINISHING P5126 0.161 0.091 21M1.2012 0, O.00Y OCOI Pm¢v Meier .NN3 7-1.20 ROYALTY CARPET MILLS SIC. 1]J52DFNMHAVE. IRNNE W14 CSOOL 2 NUMI 0. 21M1I OA cGo RA EOMM Mew 3I4110 2-1418 S A S FOUSHINGPfATING ISMILMINERV. ANAHFIM 92809 EfECTROPUTNG Alw 1 G 02 2W1-2qR OWL 0.001 0. Reel MMM ]]2813 1-.9 S 0 C CIRCUITS J0025.OAHST. SAMA ANA 921M ELECTROPIATNG<IN 08J) O.MI 2W1-ZRY2 0W2 0W1 S. OIY Meier 3344 2-Ia19 S F A P.L.P. IMN.MAINSTREET ORANGE 9266) CSWL O.WI, 00L MI-ma I). G.WO 0WJ SPIN. e9GHW 1-LJ10 SPsncNNM.W1ES 2RI18.HARBOR BI SANTA MIA WIN METµ FINISHING PSES 10911 1051 2W13W2 0036 0. O.W9 EMueni Mee, S12]E N.I.O. SAGA TENMES INC. .1 REGNYAVE. SIJI PARK 4.6M CSDOC IJ2SIN 0. NMI.. 0. SOO 0512 CRY M.Ier JtJttt ]-1-MB SANMINA CpLPoRATICN 16622VONKAIV ANAVE IR INE M12 ELECTRCPIATNG>1d( 0 ISM 2001-2W2 OW4 Gelled 0.011's 0,Meier JJM12 bINB SANMINA C011PoMTON tµRYVAYf 295SAIRYVAYAVENUE COSTA MESA III LOTµ FIN15HINGP5N5 SO 3,5R1 0 520 2W1-2W2 0.013 DA02C OVID Pans.Mel. JJM12 SIt00 SANMINA CIXIPORATON tflEOMILL) 2952REDHILLAVENUE COSTA MESA 92628 METµ FINISHING PSNS a 0.1 IS. MI.= 0. (MXd0 Mme CRY MNer 31M12 1051M1 AMCN RIVER 2-1.501 SANMINASLI LORPoMTICH AVENUE FWNTAMVFLEY 927M MI FINISHING PSNS 129111 0052 2001-Z 0.01131 0. 0,0022 Pmsev Mel. JIMt) 1-1-2N SANTA ANA PI ING 411 E.ALTON AVE. SAARAANA 92101 IMEI FINISHING PSNS 13921 0 SIG 2001-=d 0.017 0=1 0 0197 Ciry Meier 512613 2-1416 SANTANA SERNLES 12NBASTASH FIILLERTON III METµ FINISHWGP5N5 OA O01M 21M14W2 0. ..' 0. BMIA oAdMI 3]M13 11411 SLIEWHIC SPRAY FINISIES,W. ]ISSWIII RICHMAN FULLERIDN 92132 EIELTROPIATING 410K 1I 0.12 mi-2W2 0. 0. O.W6 Ciry MHa JR6122-1-0 SECNR4T INDUSTRIES.INC. 4MS E.lA PALMA AVE. ANAHEMM 928M METµ FINISHING PSNb 2 L OAl2W1-m2 0. 0W210 W716eM Dkdgft 1]91101-Ip5 SELECTCIRCURS J]W W,SEGERSTROM SIWTA MM 92]M METAL FINISHING PSNS S 0.W1 =1 M2 OWN OWN 0W RomvMal.EIECTRICµA )A-2]6 SEMICOA SEMICONDUCTORS ]JJ MCCORMICK AVENUE COSTA MESA 928M ELECTRONIC 1. 0.682 =I�NW2 0WI1 OW2 0IGH P-S,Meier -IS2-1-IJ) SERRANO WATER DISTRICT SLSLTAFTAVENUE OMNGE III CSDOC C. 0.00812W1-NOJ2 0W1 G 0W1 BMMI 221210113b SEVENLP SOTTING COMPANY TYSSp1NIGETNCRPFAVE BUENA PARK III CSDOC YJ. O 2W1.2WN om OAM 0W IDPHYNNeW 112111 'Highlighted Field Indicates 1W2112002 9:21 AM Battle Discharge,MOII 15 NPDES 2A Application AM ICI ment 5-SIUfiKIS PnoI fin lRbIR iI Disch6Tge. Page id o117 ATTACHMENTS NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY TOTAL FLOW. - DAILY DAILY II , _ INDUSTRIAL SANITARY INC.. SANITARY SANUA ^ �1��9a. WORN VDLUML VOLUME 4FIS FLOW FLOW IRY� VW FLOW PERMIYN LM+47,ICOMPANYNAME SEWER STREET SEWER CITY CEWER ZIP CATEGORY DAYS NCY) MGI :}aYEAR t.IG0 0AGD v MGD TYPE SIC 0.1 WUTN CYPRESS SIdN SHEPMD MOTHERS INC. STREET LA IABRA 'PST SOAP-DETERGENT MPG 231 2LISS S0585 Mima)02 0.0091 0.000 0,M3 EMI11.ler 1251�2 U1-05] Bq.WR STATION ONE II WEST 2231 W.CAPE C0O WAY SMTA ANA 92703 METµ FINISHING PSNS ] 7 95e am's 2001-2002 Dean Deal, 0.031 Gilt'MI TTUL2 11-3"1 SMCERMASL INC. 17105 ME131ER LANE XUMMGTCN BEACH III METµ FINISHING F5N5 m D OF%=soul-sW2 am Som cono an MeM 3JW12 SOUTH HAY CHROME 1.1-0W SµESICHROME EFFECTS 214I S.GMNO AVE SANTA MA 92M5 METµ FINISHING PSNS M 1.4se 0 MR-2002 DDOA O.OJI am City Meer M2813 JALIHM SM1NCGPTGIRCURSQ =4 W.LANE CENTER DR#A$Al1TA MA 92704 METµ FINISHING PSNS 251 UUMIN 0.1 2001.2W2 1 O.DO4 D.000H 0.0059 Present M. 334,112 MA069 SOUTHCOASTORCURS" 3500W.IAKECENDERDRM SUTUANA 92Me METµ FINISHINGPSNS 2 SAW 0325 2W1-SOUS 0.01e O.Mf 0.010 Pmmu MM> 33Wt2 VU0. SOUTH MOST CIRCUITS,INC. 3508-A WE CENTER OR. SMTAMA SORM METµ FPPSHINGPSNS 2N USUR 0.7 Ml-2002 0.005 0.W3 DeMM Prvmn MCNr 33M12 ll1"Ig SOUTH COAST OIL COMPANY SEEATTACHMENTS HUNTINGTON BEACH 92&B CSDOC J0 Date0. 2W1.2002 Oan 0. 0.0014 1111M 211111 11-1-11J SPEEDY CIRCUITS FACLG)rQ RZO SYSTEMS DRISMI A HUNTINGTON BEACH 92&9 METAL FINISHING PSNS as 0.2495 0.2M 2001 ).QDD ROOM OXIO ON,Meter 33W12 2-14n STAINLESS MICROF`DUSH INC. 12M N.GROVE ST. MAHEIM USERS METAL FINISHING FSNS M Mass 0.10 2901.2102 D.OYI R000F 0.008 Pr-MI 332013 ylqua STAR POWOER CANTING Fast PARI GARDEN GROVE W., METAL FINISHING PSNS 1 11 1 H001 2W13O2 0.000 0. O.LW+BpMi 332512 ELECTRICµ6 2-1-08F STATES CORPORARON 512 NORTH MAIN STRER ORANGE mm ELECTRONIC 24 2.= S943 SW1-Z002 0,011 D.0040 0.01 CRY Meter 33M1B 7-0Q30 STEELCASE INC. 1123WMNERAWNUE TUBRN Rental METµ FINISHING PSES a 44.2270. 8,0531 MI-MJ2 0.172 0. 0UND CIry Meter A7214 STEIN ER CORP.DBA AMERIGW 2.1858 UNENSUPPLY 1150S.2EYNST. MAHEIM Em INOUSTRIµ LAUNDRY as 15.08 am 2M1-M02 0.05] 0.0032 0.061 P..Meter ST= 2.18FA STEPANCOMPNNY 1208N.PATTST. ANMFIM 92001 $MP-0 RGEMMFG 35 SINN s"m ml-2002 0.015 ROSS nolm Ewt New 325513 2.1028 STREMICKS XERTAGE FOODS LLC eW2MISTMINSTERAVE. SIMANU 92F03-13M CSDOC winV 2001-ZW2 0.236 0001 0.2W Cly Meter 311511 2.18M STRIPCLEMCOMPMy SIMINESTFIRSTST, SATRAANA 92703 C3DOC O.BM1 0.00632C0J_M2 Deed 0. 0.011 CHy Meter M2812 SUNMR IMNDS ING A PROCTER 3-TINS GAMBLE CO 12MN.N8TIN AVE MAHEIM B2MT CSCOC 31.0 O.tJ] Mt-INNS 012/ O.KW 0.12 Effluent Meter 312111 11-1-0 SUPETHORF0RGEINC. 53020CEANS DRNE XUNONGTIXI BEACH SMO µUMINUMFORMING 3, D.MN 0= 2001.2W2 IN. 0. HC01 Persons Maier 336410 2-IL90 SUPERIOR PLATING last E.CERRR0.4 AVE ARAHEIM 92M5 METµ FINISHINGPSN$ 1.M O.IA M01-'1OYL 0 0.00011 0.007 Proceed Meter =013 'Highlighted Field Indicates 10I21I2002 9-21 AM Batch Discharge,WNW Is NPDES M Application AMathtnent 5-SIUs,sls Probably an IntermiXent Discharge. Page 15 117 ATTACHMENTS NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY TOTAL aOW, DAILY DAILY IMD . 1 ku INOUSTRIµ $ANHAAY INCINp' SANITARY 111A •••IS`i .y � i WORK AIIM••• VME R W�{( fRY'I 'WWM fI.T5i' . PANVN .113SEWERGITY LEv.CRZIP UT[fioRJ DAYS OD OL D'161C` 2-1J SUFERIORPROCEUMI 1115WBR PIAGENTIA GWZ DO .1-2W3 0. 00.tl 0.000 A-.W. ].112 2A-10 TAORMINA INDUSTRIES INC.M Im..RUEWMST. ANAHEIM AGES C$OOCI I41 0. MI-2 2 0. p. Od05 IMtlx .2111 M412 TAYCO ENGINEERING INC. 1052ANMEIIT. CYPRESS AtSb METAL FINISHING PSNS 20 0. O01 M01-2001 O.WO G0031 O.W] BRAN dalmal 1.513 TAYL0140UNN MANUFACTURING 2.1-In COMPANY 31H W.ENLRD. ANANEIM 92M METAL FINISHING PSES 003 1.01 2WIdlp2 Giant 0.009 DOING)Fmreie Mel. 333924 2-0m2 TECAPATE ENGINEERING CO.INC. 191AS.SUMSTST. ANAHEIM 92M METAL FINISHING P5N5 M OWN am 2e01-2002 O.PN01 O.M2 0DOCURMODNVIRI 2'332913 1.IJ30 TEXTRON AEROSPACE IME.WAWIERAVE. SANTA AIM 92202 METAL FINISHING PSES ZIR 5"1 2.9OKS 20OL2W2 0.023 0.0116 00352 Fall Meter 312222 III THERMALVACTECHNOLOGY 1221 A.am" VENUE GUNGE 92020 METAL FINISHING PSES 1J8 OLIMI 0. O.WO OOOMO Proceee Mel. ]]3U0 11-1-132 TIOpUE COMPANY,INC. 151011NWSTRY LOGE XUNTINGTON BEACH 92&9 6ECTROPUTIND>ION 1BMI 0.131 2W13W3 0.011 p. DO".Process Melsr b231J TCODS A OMSIOI OF HI HEINZ CO., 2d-0Y I-P. NW WHITE ROAD IRVINE 925H CSOOC 22 5. 1. 3M13002 0.02 a= OCa Effluent Meter 3115A T IaSB TOYOTA RACING OEVELOPMENT bS SMER STREET LOSLA MESA VON DOWD 31 0. 1. 2001.1W2 0. 00Aa 0. P.As MXx b 12 52-1-2111 TOYOTA MCING DEVELOPMENT R 1b$VALENCIAAYENUE TUSTN WIN C$DOC 3 0On 0351 MI.2002 0ON OOOM 0001 P Hail MHx M12 2-0302 TRANSUME TECHNOLOGY INC. 1106S.TECHNOLOGYOIR ANAHEIM WIN METAL FINISHING PSNS 2 0AT1 0 3W1-3W2 0. 0. GOING CIN Mel. W112 TREND MFMTPRINTING SERWCES i( 3.ILM INC. P9I CATALINA ST. LOS µAM w mm DODGE 0. 9.B312001-2002 0. 002 0.02 �323122 51-1-359 TTMTECXNOLCGIESMI MOS.NARB0i SLVO. SANTA µNA On" METAL FINISHING PSNS 0. 292 2001.2002 G 00101 00101 CIN Meter ]]Y12 }14M U.S.DYEING 6 FINISHING INC. USA!INDUSTRY ST. .DEN GNWE ell MGM 35 MISS 2M1 MI-M2 GOOD ONES 0.UM EMueM Miller 31MIl 3-1-M ULTRA PURE METAL FINISHING.INC. HIM N.CASE STREET ORANGE 92b5 METAL FINISHING FaN6 b ..'al O.LNO MId002 0010 0000a 0.02"CIly MN. .291J 1iM1 UNION INCORPORATED fAYA MYFORD RD. IRWNE 916 im CSDOC 25 1A.60] 1. MI 2W2 O.O5B1 OW ONCEGM Meter 311623 2Ad02 UNTED CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY INC. 16101 MT.WASHINGT01 FOUNTAINVµLEY 937M METAL FINISHING PSNS 1 Ge I p3 100U3102 O.NO OMHO 00031 F-Y.JMI ALA12 UNITED CUSTOM POLISHING S 21 PUTNG 1179 N.FOUNTAIN WAY MUHEIM WON, METAL FINISHING TONS N 0.3 O.ON 3W1-202 9.M1 OOM O.ODR Batch "I 2-i&M UNNERSM.ALLOYCONP. 3621 LA MESA AWL AMNEIM 91. µUMINUM FORMING 0.01 3 2001-HOG 0. 0. 0.009 1-e. "Ens UNNERSµ CIRCUITS LI-03J INCORPORATED 22A9 S.YALE$1. SANTA ANA 9 ININVIa METµ FINISHING PSNS 13.651 032 200Lb02 0. p.001 O.MIR CRY MetALL12 2100E.0U NGETHORPE 52�1�)51 UOP LUC AVE. ANAHEIM 92M CROW 2 0. 03M 1001Qt02 0. OW1 OM1 Frees32611J }1-025 VAN UW F000 PRODUCTS.INC. 2R5 MOORE AYE. FULLERTON 92M CSOOC 2 10.0 0. 3WI O.M01 O O.MOI ETuenI 1. 'HIghlighleE Field InclMles 10221ROD2 9:21 AM Betel Discharge,LNhich Is NPDES 2A Ap,licallon ARachmerlt 5-SlUssls Prol ably an IntermlNenl Discharge. Page 16 W 17 ATTACHMENT NPDES FORM 2A INDUSTRIAL USERS DAILY TOTAL FLOW, DAILY DAILY JNO 4 INDUSTRIAL SANITARY IND SANITARY SANRA WORK VOLUME VOLUME FISCAL'r .FLOW ''IFLOW RY 'SNANAR FLOW PERMIT NO COMPANY NAME SEWER STREET SEWER CITY SOWER ZIP LATEGONY DAYS (Mf.Y) MGY) 1.YEAR50 MGD MGD) MGD ",ITYPE'IL' EIL 21.156 VEECOELCCMOFA91NC.tl] 1176N.OSPREY ON more TAL FINISHING PENS ]c 001 mi-2W2 D.0011 Odell 0.0012 Sense MCNr m] 6,,M VELIE CIRCUITS INC. 1267LOGANAVE. COSTA MESA 92625 METAL FINISHING ASKS JS' 99377 1331 3C01-20(2 D.02M DDOW 0 W17 Cls,MI JJnnV ELECTRICAL& 1-1-050 VENTED,INCORPORATED 1241 E.DYER RD.,N100 SANTAANA 92705 ELECTRONIC 260 4 4042 0.001M MI.2002 0.0169 0.0023 0 SHE Eft.MCMr JNIq 1-1N2 =TORY CIRCUITS WO. 1272 S.LYON ST. SANTAANA 0210 METAL FINISHING PSNS 3 0.14I GSM 300I.= DOERS 0,0002 00M P-.Meter 11AU2 VILLA PARK ORCHARDS 2-0415 ASSOCIATION 350 N.CYPRESS ORANGE 92506 CSDOL m 1A111 1.01 =I.M2 Deals R.JF 00105 CMy Meter R2,80 2-I-036 WALKER CUSTOM COATING tell E.OALL RO. ANAHEIM 920p5 METAL FINISHING PSN$ 25 0.131 0033 2001-2002 0.00 0.0001 0 0002 CIry Mnlnr ]N1,3 1.1SH WEBER PRECISIONGMPNILS 2730 BIUNNON ST. SAIRAANA 031d CSOOC 3 O.Od OJ 31101.3W2 O.Wd O.Ld 0.031 Bach �F J WEIDMUIN WATER CONDITIONERS, 2-Id63 INC. IID3 E.ROSSLYNN AVENUE FULLERTON 92531 CSOOC 25 TAN O.IIN 3W1-]W3 GG28 (1 002E CRY Mew 5 TAAia WESCO SERVICES LTI2 RUNWAY AVE.UNIT F TUSTIN 927N METAL FINISHING PSHb 0055 DAVIS2W1-9p2 0.000 6LWI O.WJJ P-Meter 3 61.110 WEST NEWPORTOIL COMPANY 1030 W.ITTNSTREET COSTAMESA wit" MOW I.NB 0.10d 2d1-Ad D.003 DAMO 0W1 EF.1 MeM 2 3.1-114 WESTERN YARN DYEING INC. 2011 RAYMER AVENUE FULLERTON 925]] CSDOC 2 1.3611 021 MIVX2 O.Od 00J0 0W ce,Meter 3 3.1dT0 WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY 001 E.BALL RD. ANAHEIM 92WS CSD(O 2 6.2622 1.1 2001-2002 0.0251 0.0070 00321 Effluent MI 3 51-130 WHEEL SERVCES GROUP.INC. 25250.BIRCH ST. SANAANA 92Td METAL FINISHING RISKS 2 O.NB GlassSOON 20d 0.001 0000. 0WI CRY Mmer J-1.3T1 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC. d030E3CANSOAVE. BUENAPARK KB20 CSDOC b 1.1 0AT3120d-2W2 O.Od Odd 0035 BeM 33-Eels WINONICS IBRFA) OW N.WEME ST. BREA 02521 METAL FINISHING PSNS 2 19A 1, 201-2W2 O.dB SA OOd CNY MeM 32.1-TJS WINONMS.INC. 125]SOUTHSTATELOLLEGE FULLERTON E25]I METAL FINISHING PSNS 203 1.d91200L2W2 D.M9 O.d] OOI.CIry MeM 3 1.1d0 WIMEC.LLD IbI MLWW I.. 3IR METAL FINISHING PSNS 19 0.221 O.d 201L20d O.Wt 00001 DOOR PZu MOW J12999 2-0d15 WORIA CITRUS WEST 130 WEST SANTA FE AVENUE FULLERTON 02032 CSDOC 2 18082 11.e01 -' 1 ' 00 0.0]2 00JMEIAuenI MeM J11111 1-1-01J KZ%ELECTRONICS IM2 E.00RCH ND SANUANA 9210 METAL FINISHING PSNS 0.09E O.OIB 2WI30d 00.tl1 O.W01 OLCO Pmceu MeM 39UR 3-1-002 Y2K TEMILE CO.,INC. N51 EAST MYMERAVENUE FUL ERTON 9- C - 0, OE 3101.20]2 0. D.A 1.1231CIry MeM 1.1- 'Highlighted Field Indicates IW2112002 9:21 AM Belch Discharge.Mich Is NPDES 2A Application Attachment 5-SIUe.9la Probably an Intermittent Discharge. Page 17 of 17 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER OF EPA-CATEGORICAL INDUSTRIES, NON-EPA-CATEGORICAL INDUSTRIES, AND MISCELLANEOUS INDUSTRIES OCTOBER 14, 2002 #OF EPA #OF NON-EPA EPA CATEGORICALS CATEGORICALS NON-EPA SIGNIFICANT USERS SIGNIFICANT USERS ALUMINUM FORMING 10 CSDOC 121 BATTERY MFG 2 INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY 5 COIL COATING 1 126 COPPER FORMING 1 ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC 8 ELECTROPLATING<10K 11 MISCELLANEOUS PERMITTEES: I#OF MISC PERMITTEES ELECTROPLATING>10K 18 Special Purpose Discharge Permits 66 ELECTROPLATING-PNb10K 3 Urban Runoff Permits 2 METAL FINISHING PSES 22 Urban Runoff-Pa Season 1 METAL FINISHING PENS 153 Wastehaulem 31 METAL MOLDING 8 CASTING 2 TOTAL MISC PERMITTEES 100 NONFERROUS METALS FORMING 2 NONFERROUS METALS MFG 1 ORGANIC CHEMICALS-PLASTICSSYN 1 PHARMACEUTICAL MFG 1 PULP-PAPERBOARD 1 SOAP-DETERGENT MFG 8 TOTAL EPA CATEGOKWALS 243 TOTAL, EPA+NON-EPA 369 GRAND TOTAL, EPA+NON-EPA+MISC d69 10/21/2002 9:23 AM NPDES 2A Application Attachment 5-SIUs.xls Page 1 of 1 DRAFT Page CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL State Of California PROTECTION AGENCY Regional WalerQGahly Control Board .` APPLICATIONIREPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE GENERAL INFORMATION FORM FOR WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS OR NPDES PERMIT A. Fe CIII I. FACILITY INFORMATION x..., ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT aaa .u, 10844 ELLIS AVENUE nry, mmry, ea a, isv tcb, FOUNTAIN VALLEY ORANGE CA 92708 emcee ROBE ra.pm,.xra.r, ROHERT GHIAELLI (714) 593-7400 B. Facility Owner: p•u, oro•[ryp• ICMeR m•I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT a 0 '°°""°'1 i ❑ m[m[.um Mo...•o W L Q s.ewr•Eb 10844 ELLIS AVENUE Rvmcr u ty, vac, Lip tub, s. ❑ etd•n FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 NUet I.— 1.2y4m.IA�.e, rtl.[•1 S•u ID, ROBERT GHIAELLI (714)593-7400 C. Facility Operator(The agency or business,not the person): xun m•r.a[syv. Ica.eR o.•1 SAME AS OWNER L O ai°l L ❑ ormnam seb•.n s. ® am.:m.osu L � rrwr.ap Aver pN• sna, ila aJ.i s. Q linsus G.nm, bl.pavu Lma.n D. Owner of the Land: ,,..., a.m.[ IeGeR m•1 SAME AS OWNER >• 0 aau smsieml s. 0 m.mnnm em[..., s. ® aew.a..t.l s. ❑ prmr•Mp aver ury, earn np oea., s 0 mar, cenact a.r.m, sa.pmm n.v.n E. Address Where Legal Notice May Be Served: 11d°`...I SAME AS OWNER ney, M., ilp men w,aer r•rmn, »1•vam.xw.r, F. Billin Address: am .. SAME AS OWNER aery, eaa, LIp cue•, Canact vr•m, i.1•pam.MmMr, ran vee,Hm Page 6 CA IFORAIA BN IRCNMEBTAL SlateofCallfol]da w'« PROTECTION AGENCY Regional WaierQuality Cuelrol Board ',...j.' a. APPLICATION/REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE GENERAL INFORMATION FORM FOR WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS OR NPDES PERMIT IL TYPE OF DISCHARGE Check Type of Discbarge(s)Described in this Application(A III B): A.WASTE DISCHARGE TO LAND ® B.WASTE DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATER Check all that apply: ® Domestic/Municipal Wastewater ❑ orAma Anil utcultural Wastewater Treatment and Disposal ❑ Animal Waste Solids q ❑ Cooling Water ❑ Land Treatment Unit ❑ Biosolids/Residual ❑ Mining ❑ Dredge Material Disposal ❑ Hazardous Waste (see instructions) ❑ Waste Pik ❑ Surface Impoundment ❑ Landfill (see instructions) ❑ Wastewater Reclamation ❑ Industrial Process Wastewater ❑ .SWCTR Water ❑ Other, please describe: III. LOCATION OF THE FACILITY Describe the physical location of the facility. 1. Auasor'a Parcel Number(,) 3. latitude 3. Longitude Facility: SEE ATTACHMENT 1 Fadllty:SEE NPDES FORM 2A Facility: SEE NPDES FORM A Discharge Poion Discharge Point: Discharge Point: IV. REASON FOR FILING ❑ New Discharge or Facility ❑Changes in Ownemhip/Opemtor(see instructions) ❑ Change in Design or Operation 93 Waste Discharge Requirements Update or NPDES Permit Reisman" ❑ Change in Quantity/Type of Discharge ❑Other: V. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT(CEQA) Name of Lead Agenry: N/A — EXISTING FACILITY Hasa public agency d,ermin,d the, the proposed project is nempt from CEQA? ❑Yes ❑ No If Ym,,ate the basi, for the esemp,lan and the name of,be agenry supplying the eumpdon on the has below. Basis for EsemptiaNAgency: He.a "N.1k,of Determinarion" been filed under CEQA? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, endom• copy of the CEQA document.Environments]impart Report.or Negative Declaration. if no,Identify the espeeted type of CEQA document and ,petted date of completion. Expected CEQA Documents: ❑ EIR ❑ Negative Deelaralime Espe,ed CEQA Comph,iun Date: Page 7 CALifoRAlA I1:1MRGAMENTAE State of Califormis ee .re pROTECT1Ole AGENCY Regional WaterQuatity Control Board APPLICATION/REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE GENERAL INFORMATION FORM FOR WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS OR NPDES PERMIT VI. OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION Please provide a COMPLETE characterization of your discharge. A complete characterization includes, but is not limited to,design and actual Bows,a list of constituents and the discharge concentration of each constituent,a list of other appropriate waste discharge characteristics,a description and schematic drawing of all treatment processes,a description of any Best Management Practices(BMPs)used,and a description of disposal methods. Also include a site map showing the location of the facility and,if you are submitting this application for an NPDES permit,identify the surface water to which you propose to discharge. Please try to limit your maps to a scale of 1:24,000(7.5'USGS Quadrangle)or a street map,if more appropriate. VH. OTHER Attach additional sheets to explain any responses which need clarification. List attachments with titles and dates below: SEE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INCLUDED WITH APPLICATION You wig be nadfied by.representative of the RWQC within 30 do"of receipt of your appIketion. The modes wW emta ifyour applkatlon b complete or if there is Widens]informed..you must submit to complete your Applintioo/Report of Wane Discharge, pursuant to Division 7,Section 13260 of the California Water Code. VHI. CERTIFICATION "I certify under penalty of law that this document. Including all attachments and supplemental information,were prepared under my direction and supervision In accordance with a system dulgned to estate that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the informed.. submitted. Based an my Inquiry of the person or persons who menage the rynem, or those percent directly responsible for gathering the information,the Information submitted Is,m the peel of my knowledge and belief,trap accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false Information, Including the possibility of fine and imprisonment." (tint Name: BLAKE P. ANDERSON Title GENERAL MANAGER Signature: Date FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Dale Fmm t06Rndvds Lena to Discharger Fee Amount Received: cheeses s twnH. Attachment t —Form 200 1. Assessor Parcel Numbers for Plant 1: 156-181-02, 156-181-02, 156-181- 03, 156-101-01, 156-101-03, 156-101-04. 156-101-05, 156-175-01. 2. Assessor Parcel Numbers for Plant 2: 114-160-13, 114-160-32, 114-160- 35, 114-160-36, 114 160-37, 114-160-38. 114-160-02. 114-160-43, 114- 160-58, 149-111-08, 149-111-13, 149-111-17. 3. Assessor Maps enclosed. PGP. As 1/I. SEC. 33. 7 S S. B 10 <6t�, Pa?. A[ 114, SEC. 37. T S S. R 10 I R ' .�..nv.<a E.z � I!!r O � O'm4IFI�OMI.YYfIO KY 171 S O / la / (1➢ trr YYsrevaTM {srrccr / Yort - ASSESsm'S YxAA .` P. EL r ,M 6 .,far vam In ONLES -H �E ® ASSCSSOf'S rN L<r ' ppp 156 PA" IT II N .Ofs � i � .VI u ® )ML f IlY IIIQI JEP(Er P I — i \ cueam �\ IISA rr eYnr m.wi rr�jS ^A� e I(9 7t1� IWKM 1%9 I \\ IY ,{!-p 16 P M •�P.Y 2t✓Fm / \y I a 0 W.I/2, S.E.//<, SEG 32, T.3 S., R. /0 W. 8 I e w ® y xoc e n.s...n / O u me _ L 'V� !/NEE1 r III 07 NANCR/%9 �r�llll �UY'!G NOTE-FfsQSM! B[aCR � /!lEflOMS YIv NNCf(. MVYKN9 9A'If ISB vl6f 10 O 9RMM M CMt10 CWNTY 0 0RIN9E i --------- - --- s POR. E//Y,SE//9,SEC 30,T.S 5,R./0 W.P POR. N.W.//a,S.W.W,SE 33, T.SS.,R./O W. rt� u • L TO 7'p.I 1. eL 9.5. 9 � � pJY ALfA a — eflJc n.)eea 8 i e 1F M _ I �Q NOIE-ISSEfSMS fl[OCY B LSSF 156 PIBCfC M/YBFBJ BLONISB PI BE IB fNOWN/N L/.R'LE5 LIX/MTI Of LNINBE 8 PW.. NW Y4,SW M4, SW IM S=IT, L6S,A IOW. - d POR. SE.Y4, SE.w, 5E6.W, r6S, R.IOW. 149-I 3 4zz-34 g „`ti R /X�"'" �• J1J00• SJNTA AN/ /4J N•LnJ/�eJ /I/4ER / NK. __ _ ____ J_ ___ _ __ __ _ ____�_ ____ _______ __ _ ___ _ JO' AIMr N 4[ JJRR fKfYNI BMNMY I ; M r OIW.Ur. 11 ® i M./ � M�I •Y M.P//A 1 It N.s ® 1C M :J6 � ACT ar 1 s 1 3 4 smumqwft pplQ! �Ago y. f 44r 0 3 � pep■[ Af A /9M BJNNMK TRACT 'A.A I-54.3303-I66 nort.AMJ s K= A AUI l.1 1 F�ouC MAt W..66T6 YN.3S1-4.5.6 NSQ MYY a sOO M81AC[II PAAM AMP AM W-IIISI6ffT/.I1T-19 gIpWN M p�[Ip COIgJII Of OSANGs ........ y nit vY nS MlI(R0 M a.MY `,b` [Wln.sutSM Lar. PI... 4 IS IK.fYSfa w.<S M WMWn[.f N l If I(MNr/Ol RR, W WaIUIINI .1 RITP bM .O. NL.RRDLILO. NI P/a15 LLPTB. ,` ec>Mrar L.Kt coNr..xtt++w LRtl 149-I I rr.nvK ` E may Is Bs .i 48 .If1K Io.L K. `p9 � I 6 }ADC 11 BP b 49 m BI 19 RsrP-n � �9� i. �� 4Atl•l. 4 If.n F. I• �6(p� II.MC e Y I •.� Y Raas-/R, I I N SMMY In? AOAWNB rNACr NOSE - ASSESSM'S HLXI H � ASSESSM'S IMP PARCEL ~ERS HHCB 114 PA" 16 SHH IN CIRCLES COIRIII 6 HRARCE VOLUME 1-3 OCEAN DISCHARGE CRITERIA RESPONSE TO CWA 403(C) DRAFT Orange County-Permit Application Compliance with Clean Water Act§403(c) Section 125.124(s)-The director shall determine whether a discharge will cause unreasonable degradation of the marine environment based on consideration of: Section 125.124(a)(1)-The quantities,composition and potential for bioaccumulation or persistence of the pollutants to be discharged; Location and Description of Facility The District operates wastewater treatment plants in Fountain Valley (Reclamation Plant 1) and Huntington Beach (Plant 2), California. These plants receive sewage and industrial wastewater from approximately 2.3 million inhabitants and approximately 596 permitted Industrial sources located within a 1,200 square kilometer (km") (470 square mile) service area. Wastewater is treated by the District using a combination of advanced primary and secondary treatment to attain at least a 75% reduction in suspended solids concentrations. In August 2002, the District was ordered to Initiate a bacterial reduction program by the addition of bleach to the effluents of both treatment plants. Aker bleach is added and contact time in the system reduces bacterial levels by about two logs(100-fold reduction),sodium bisulphke is added to reduce any residual chlorine to meet permit limits and prevent toxicity to marine life. Treated wastewater (effluent) Is discharged to the ocean through an outfall system extending over four miles offshore from Huntington Beach terminating in an outfall diffuser which releases effluent at a mixing ratio greater then 200:1 at an average depth of 60 meters below the surface. The wastewater discharge system consists of booster pumps,surge towers,a four-mile, 120-inch ouffall pipe with 6,000 foot terminal diffuser, a one-mile 78-inch emergency outfall with a 1,000-foot diffuser, and an emergency overflow system to discharge to Santa Ana River. Two booster pump stations pump the mixture of advanced primary and secondary effluent to the ocean ouffalls. The two surge towers,88 and 98 feet in elevation,provide flexibility for hydraulic operation of the system. The primary outfall is a 120-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe approximately 8 km (4.5 miles) in length. The end section of the pipe is a 1.8 km (6,000 it) long diffuser section that ranges in diameter from 120 inches to 78 Inches and contains 500 circular ports and a flapgate at the and of the pipe. Effluent is dispersed through the ports at an average depth of 60 m (188 feet). The 78-Inch outfall Is 7,000 feet long with a 1,000 foot diffuser discharging through ports at an average depth of 60 feel. This was the primary ouHell for the plants prior to wnstruction of the 120-Inch oulfell In 1971, but it has not been used since the 120-Inch outfall was placed Into service, and is designated as emergency use by the Districts' NPDES permit. Additionally, the District has the capability to discharge to the Santa Ana River through two 50-foot overflow weirs at Plant No. 2. The discharge facility is designated for extreme emergency use only by the District's NPDES permit. The average discharge volume is 234 million gallons per day(MGD)of treated wastewater to the ocean. Over the past two decades,wastewater discharge volumes have generally increased due to continuing population growth within the District's service area. For example, wastewater flows increased from approximately 170 to 260 MGD between 1975 and 1990. During 1991-92, average flows decreased to 221 MGD, likely due to drought conditions and consequent water conservation measures (OCSD 1993). Average flow increased to 255 MGD in 1997-98 due to high rainfall amounts, Including several major storm events related to El Nino conditions. In addition to storm water infiltration, the District has been coordinating with local agencies in Orange County since 1999 to treat and dispose of dry weather urban runoff generated from Inland and waste[ cities. The purpose of this collaborative effort is to reduce the impacts of urban runoff on Orange County's beaches. For nearly three wnsecutive years, the District's urban mnoff program has contributed to a decrease of fecal wliform and enterococci exceedences along beaches In Huntington Beach. Currently, the District has been receiving and treating an average flow volume of 1.7 million gallons per day(MGD)of dry-weather urban runoff. This urban runoff comes from 11 diverted stormwater pump stations owned by the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Newport Beach, and three diverted flood control channels owned by the Orange County Public Facilities Resources Department (OCPFRD). The number of urban runoff diversion systems is anticipated to increase. Regional Setting The District's ocean outfall is located on the southern portion of the San Pedro Shelf, adjacent to one of the most highly urbanized areas in the United States. The present population of the southern California coastal zone exceeds 12 million people, of which two-thirds live in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Convenient access and the temperate climate of the region result in high year-round use of public beaches throughout this coastal strip. For example, almost 22 million people went to Newport Beach and Huntington Beach areas during 1996 (MEC Analytical Systems, Inc. 1997). Of these beach area users,approximately 5.5 million were involved in water contact recreation, primarily(99.7%)swimming and surfing within about 300 yards (100 m)from shore. Public use of nearshore waters more than 300 yards from shore was very limited(0.3%of the total water contact recreation),with only 0.03% of users participating in SCUBA diving,as the principal subsurface activity. The coastal region of the District's outfall is affected by large and small-scale natural processes and human influences, including the wastewater discharge and numerous impact sources (such as contaminated runoff from land) that are unrelated to the District's discharge. Therefore, to accurately evaluate effects from the discharge, it is Important to study and understand both natural and human influences. Natural Influences Natural processes and influences can be highly variable (OCSD 1998a) and can affect environmental conditions to a similar or greater extent than those due to wastewater discharges. This was particularly evident from the substantial Increases in rainfall runoff during the El Niflo event of 1997-98(U.S.Water News 1998). Environmental conditions and biological communities within the study area are strongly Influenced by episodic storms, drought, and climatic cycles. The greatest effects were produced by recent wet-year cycles and El Niflo conditions In 1982-83, 1993-94, 1994-95,and 1997-98,and drought conditions from 1985 through 1992(Heyward 1993; NOAA 1997; U.S. Water News 1998). More typical rainfall conditions, punctuated by several large storms, occurred from about 1994 to 1996 (Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission 1998; U.S.Water News 1998). The 1997-98 El Niflo condition was followed almost immediately by a weak to moderate La Nina event beginning in MayJune 1998 and persisted through 1999. Essentially normal conditions were reestablished by about March 2000, continuing through at least October 2001 (NOAA 2001). Storms and stormwater runoff have a large influence on sediment movement to the study region (Brownlie and Taylor 1981), although there are few direct measurements of sediment Inputs from single-storm events. Major storms also can generate waves capable of extensive shoreline erosion,sediment resuspension,and movement of sediments along the coast as well as offshore. The Santa Ana and San Gabriel Rivers transport much of the runoff from the local mountain ranges. River flows, together with urban stormwater runoff, are important, episodic sources of freshwater, sediments, suspended particles, nutrients, and contaminants to the coastal area (Hood 1993. Grant, et.al. 2001). While many of the materials supplied by river runoff to coastal waters are essential to maintaining natural (biogeochemical)cycles, either an excess or a deficit may have important environmental consequences. Conditions within the District's study area are also affected by large-scale and regional-scale current patterns that have important influences on the water mass characteristics and directions of water flow along the Orange County coastline (see Appendix D.1). Consistent with the seafloor alignment, predominant current flows are upcoast and downwast(OCSD 1997. 1998a; SAIC 2001). In particular, upper layer currents in the study area(typically to about 25an depths) are mostly directed downwast,while lower layer currents are directed upwast. Discharges from local rivers and natural,oceanographic processes, such as upwelling and eddy movements, also influence the characteristics of receiving waters on the San Pedro Shelf. Tidal flows, currents, and internal waves transport and mix inputs, including the Disbicl's offshore wastewater discharge, with coastal waters and sediments. Tidal currents In the study region are relatively weak as compared to background (lower frequency)currents (OCSD 2001). Thus, although tidal currents contribute to the net transport of water masses, including the effluent plume, in both alongshore and cross-shelf directions, they appear to represent a secondary influence. These combined processes and events contribute to the natural variability and environmental changes within the study area. The San Pedro Shelf is composed primarily of soft sediments (sands with slits and clays) and inhabited by biological communities typical of these environments. The wastewater discharge structure (outfall) represents one of the largest artificial reels along this coastal region and supports communities typical of hard substrates (OCSD 2000). Seafloor depths generally are aligned parallel to the shoreline(east to west in this region),with the exceptions of Newport and San Gabriel Canyons. which are located southeast and northwest, respectively, of the District's outfall. Receiving water and biological conditions for the area of the District's ouffall are described in Sections 1 B and 1C, respectively. Human Influences and Activities Nearshore coastal waters of the Southern California Bight receive municipal and industrial wastes from a variety of human-related sources (wastewater discharges, dredged material disposal, oil and gas activities, boat/vessel discharges, urban runoff, and atmospheric fallout), the majority of which are located between Point Dume and San Mateo Point. In addition, discharges from the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers are responsible for substantial Inputs of contaminants to the Southern California Bight (SCCWRP 1992; Schafer and Gossett 1988). Similarly, outflow from Newport Bay,which receives pollutants from urban, agricultural, and industrial runoff, as well as from boat harbors and marinas within the bay, represents a potential scarce of contaminants to the ocean. Cirwlallon of coastal water and contaminant inputs have contributed to changes throughout the region such as localized increases in some sediment contaminants and changes in some biological communities. However, from this large-scale perspective, reductions in wastewater wntributions of chemical contaminants to the Southern California Bight over the past two decades are well-documented and resulted in a return to more natural conditions (Schafer 1989; OCSD 2001). To a lesser extent, this is also true for the many other sources, such as atmospheric deposition, river runoff, non-point source drainage from land, movement of contaminants by ocean currents, and dredged material disposal. Some of these sources have been better studied than others (i.e., dredged materials), and many have increased in relative importance over time compared to current wastewater inputs(SCCWRP 1973, 1992). Section 125.122(a)(2)— Potential transport of such pollutants by biological, physical and chemical processes. The District's 301(h)monitoring program was designed to evaluate compliance with specific NPDES permit conditions and 301(h)criteria, but it was not specifically intended to evaluate mechanisms or processes that are potentially Important for understanding the transport and fate of wastewater components. However,the District has conducted a number of special studies that provide information specifically for developing a better understanding of the processes that affect the District's wastewater discharge. These studies include: • Plume Tracking/Ocean Currents Strategic Process Study; • Particle Settling Strategic Process Study; • Newport Canyon Sediments Strategic Process Study; • Particle Tracking Model;and • Huntington Beach Phase III study. These studies provided important information regarding physical, chemical, and biological processes that can affect movement of the District's wastewater plume, empirical data on the distribution of the plume under varying oceanographic conditions, and models simulating the behavior of plume constituents. Further, while the monitoring program was not intended for evaluation of transport processes, the monitoring results provide useful information (e.g., spatial footprints for wastewater constituents) for describing the fate of the District's discharge. Key finding from these studies, as well as relevant results from the monitoring program, are summarized below for characterizing processes that are potentially important for dispersion and transport of the District's discharge. Additional, detailed information is presented in Appendices D.I.D.2,D.3,and D.5. Plume Tracking/Ocean Currents SPS This Strategic Process Study(SPS)consisted of two components: (1) Document ocean current and hydregraphic conditions in the vicinity of the outfall diffuser using in-situ instruments to describe conditions that may affect the transport and fate of the discharged wastewater,and (2) Conduct ship-based surveys to track discharge plume constituents (e.g.. bacteria and ammonium) and document changes in the plume location/configuration under different seasonal and environmental conditions (e.g., stratified versus unstratified, and upwelling versus non-upwelling). The two study components were conducted concurrently, and real-time data from the ocean currents component were used to determine when appropriate conditions for the plume tracking study were occurring and, thus, facilitate documenting the plume behavior during these periods. Key findings relative to potential transport of plume-related constituents are summarized below. Ocean Currents The objectives of the Ocean Currents study were to provide the following: • Data to describe and understand oceanographic circulation patterns that transport and mix the wastewater plume from the District's ouffall; • Real-time current and stratification data that could be used for determining conditions triggering plume tracking surveys;and • Oceanographic data to determine initial boundary conditions for use in validatingWerifying results from subsequent modeling efforts; and The physical oceanographic field measurement program was conducted in the general vicinity of the District's outfall from June 1999 to June 2000. During the study, current flows near the diffuser were generally bi-directional such that upcoast currents were more prevalent below approximately 25-m depth, and downcoast flows were more prevalent above 25 m. However, current patterns were also variable, such that up- and downcoast low frequency currents sometimes occurred simultaneously over the entire water column. Amplitudes of the along-and cross-isobath components were nearly depth Independent. Upcoast currents were accompanied by a small onshore component In the upper 20 m,with a compensating offshore component in the lower part of the water column. When the along-isobath transport was downcoast, the flow directions of surface and deeper layers were reversed with off- and onshore components respectively. This is consistent with weak downwelling and upwelling that was driven by up-and downcoast currents,respectively,over the outer shelf. Local low frequency (synoptic scale) winds likely were not strong enough to drive shelf-scale upwelling or downwelling events. Local, lower frequency winds as measured at the District's Plant No. 2,just onshore of the mooring sites, were generally weak(<2 m/s), but were oriented in a persistently upwelling-favorable direction during the summer. It is expected that wind velocities of 5 to 10 mds are required to drive the background currents measured on this area of the shelf. This possibility also would mean that local upwelling and downwelling may have been influenced by forced alongshore currents over the outer shelf and upper slope, consistent with the dynamics proposed for the Santa Monica shelf just to the north of Palos Verdes(Hickey 1992). The general conclusion from the evaluation of simultaneous current and temperature fields Is that the large local temperature changes were not caused primarily by upwelling and downwelling. Rather, they resulted mainly from horizontal transport of warmer water from the south and colder/cooler water from the north. The only time when weak upwelling occurred was in the spring and fall when equatorward, upper-layer currents overlaid poleward subsurface currents. During these episodes a thin band of upwelled water was present along substantial stretches of the coastline. Tidal currents in the study area are relatively weak as compared to the backgrouri lower frequency current fluctuations. Tidal analyses did, however, result in an unexpected conclusion. There was a strong periodic current fluctuation at exactly 24 hours, with a weaker but probably linked response at one-half this period - 12 hours. The forcing mechanism was most likely the significant diurnal sea-breeze system that exists in the study area. The current fluctuations at a 24-hour period were strongly sheared so that below the general level of the thermodine, the amplitude of fluctuations was smaller and more consistent with normal tidal currents expected at this period. In summary, the study results indicated that slope processes have a primary Influence on the subtidal current and temperature patterns measured across the San Pedro shelf. Currents driven by the local sea-breeze system forced a strong sheared flow in the upper third of the water column over the outer shelf, with strongest winds and strongest currents in summer. The magnitude of this wind driven current decreased across the shelf such that the response over the 15-m isobath was only 25-30%of that occurring in the vicinity of the outfall. Plume Tracking Study The purpose of the plume tracking component of the study was to provide quantitative characterizations of the effluent plume as Influenced by physical oceanographic processes, primarily water column stratification and currents. Processes that control the fate and determine the likelihood of onshore transport were of particular interest. Specific study objectives were to provide: • Quantitative descriptions of the effluent plume during different seasons and oceanographic conditions; • Graphic representations of the effluent plume that were diagnostic yet comprehendible to the public; • Data for input to and evaluation of future modeling of the distribution and dispersion of the effluent plume under various oceanographic conditions. The study used towed instrumentation packages with pumping(flow-through capabilities to allow three dimensional mapping of the wastewater plume based on the vertical and horizontal distributions of key water quality parameters. Ten separate surveys were conducted over a period of 13 months(August 1999 through September 2000). The surveys encompassed a range of oceanographic conditions(e.g.,current regimes and stratification patterns). Results from these surveys indicated the following: • The average longshelf current directions in the lower portion of the water column strongly influenced the location of the plume; • Despite the wide range in stratification and current regimes, effluent plumes exhibited somewhat consistent characteristics; • Plumes were detectable more than 7.5 km from the outtall in both upcoast and downcoast directions, and plume widths varied from less than 1 km to more than 7.5 km depending on distance from ouffall; • Plumes tended to follow bottom topography, except when flow downcoast was strong and plumes separated from the topography and crossed Newport Canyon; • When plumes moved inshore over Newport Canyon, they remained submerged and there was no evidence of plume surfacing in the canyon; • No significant relationship between distance of plume to shore and magnitude of coliform levels on the beach were observed; • No evidence of plume surfacing to depths shallower than 20 m was observed. Thus, plumes transported effluent constituents over distances of several kilometers, both upooast and downcoasl from the outtall depending on the predominant current direction. During upcoast flow, the plume remained several kilometers from the Orange County shoreline. During downcoast flow, the plume approached within approximately 1 kilometer of shore near the head of Newport Canyon. However, the plume remained submerged, and there was no relationship between distance from the plume to shore and levels of coliform bacteria on the adjacent beach. Particle Settling SPS The objectives of this study were: (1) collect settling particles at several locations near the District's ouffall over a one-year period; (2) chemically analyze the partides to determine spatial distributions and magnitudes of effluent particle settling and the relative contribution from other particle sources (e.g., river runoff, biological, and resuspended sediments); and (3) evaluate possible seasonal trends in effluent particle settling rates relative to changes in the District's solids emissions. The purpose of this study was to provide information for evaluating the fate of the particulate fraction of the wastewater plume. This information is important for several reasons: • Measurements of effluent panicle settling, when combined with the results of the on-going plume tracking and effluent characterization strategic process studies, will support the District's ultimate goal of developing a predictive model of wastewater fate and behavior,and • Support assessments of whether the District's effluent discharge causes higher solids deposition(per receiving water criterion specified in the California Ocean Plan). Measurements of currents,water temperature, and wave energy were also conducted to provide information on physical processes potentially affecting the fate of settling wastewater particles. The results showed higher fluxes of organic carbon,molecular markers for sewage(linear alkylbenzenes),and some trace constituents near the outfall than at reference sites. The effluent discharge contributes an estimated 10-13%of the panicle flux in the immediate vicinity,of the outfall compared to 2-3%at nearfield sites,and 1-1.4%at the upcoast reference site. However, estimates based on sediments indicate that effluent panicle represent only 2.6%or less of the solids deposited on the bottom within the zone of initial dilution(ZID)and approximately 1% of the solids at the ZID boundary. The differences between the effluent panicle contributions to the settling fraction and the fraction incorporated into the bottom sediments likely represents materials that become pan of a transient near-bottom floc layer but are not incorporated into the sediment matrix. The highest panicle fluxes occurred at the head of Newport Canyon, but the panicles consisted primarily of terrigenous sediments with very little effluent contributions. Contributions of effluent solids were highest immediately adjacent to the outfall,where effluent panicles contributed approximately 13%of the particle flux. Settling of effluent panicles near the ouffall contributed to organic carbon fluxes that were approximately three to four times higher than those measured at the 60-m reference site. Panicles collected near the outfall also contained higher concentrations of IABs,as well as silver,cadmium,copper,zinc, PAHs,and PCBs, although the magnitude of the differences varied seasonally. Newport Canyon Sediment Strategic Process Study The objective of this study was to evaluate whether wastewater panicles from the District's outfall accumulate within nearshore portions of Newport Canyon and,if so, represent a potential for remobilization and onshore transport of panicle-associated contaminants. The fate of wastewater-derived contaminants is important for assessing possible interferences with beneficial uses of nearshore areas of the Orange County coastline. This is an important objective because results from the District's ocean monitoring program and special studies(e.g.,Maurer at al., 1994a,b;Phillips at al., 1997)indicated that some chemical contaminants accumulate in bottom sediments within Newport Canyon. Submarine canyons represent a depositional sink for particle- associated contaminants(Maurer at al., 1994b). However,the relative contributions from various wntaminant input sources, including the District's discharge,to the elevated concentrations are not well known. Further,the long-term fate of sediment-associated contaminants deposited within the canyon,including potentials for resuspension and transport towards shore,are unknown. A key question is whether chemical and/or bacteriological contaminants from the District's discharge accumulate within Newport Canyon and, if so,are subject to onshore transport. This study focused on sedimentary processes because sediments integrate the inputs of particulate contaminants over long time periods,and provide a more appropriate perspective than water column measurements for evaluating contaminant accumulation and potentials for remobilizalion to nearshore locations. The study objective was evaluated by measuring concentrations of a molecular marker for sewage — linear alkylbenzenes (LABS) — in bottom sediments throughout the canyon, as well as in sediments from three general locations within the Santa Ana River,which represents a likely source for particle inputs to Newport Canyon. Results from the study indicated that LAB concentrations In Santa Ana River sediments were generally low but detectable, particularly during winter, suggesting that river discharges may contribute LABS to offshore sediments. Nevertheless, the LAB concentrations in river sediments were several orders of magnitude lower than those In the District's effluent and up to several times lower than the maximum concentrations In bottom sediments on the San Pedro Shelf. Thus, wastewater discharges appeared to be the dominant source of LABS to the San Pedro Shelf. Distributions of LABS in Newport Canyon sediments showed dear patterns of increasing concentrations with greater distance from shore. Concentrations near the head of the canyon were low and comparable to those in river and harbor sediments. These spatial distributions indicated that wastewater-derived particles are not accumulating in the shallow,nearshore portions of the canyon. Furthermore,the District's ocean monitoring program,together with results from other studies,demonstrated the presence of fine-grained sediments and low current speeds in the canyon,indicating low potentials for onshore sediment movement. Instead,the present information demonstrated strong tendencies for a net flux into the Canyon,with deposition and accumulation or net down-canyon movement as the likely fate for particulate materials entering the canyon. Particle Tracking Model The objectives of this study were to use two proven algorithms in combination with local appropriate environmental observations to evaluate: • The vertical rise and nearfield geometry of the wastewater plume coming from the OCSD diffuser; • The fate of wastefield particulates as they were transported and deposited on the local bottom;and • The cumulative probability of exposure over the adjacent shelf to the diluted wastewater plume. The physical processes of dispersion and mixing of waste material,discharged from a submerged outlall,can be divided into two phases. The first Is dominated by the momentum of the discharge jets and Is known as the'nearfield mixing phase.' The approach to calculate the rise height and plume geometry in the nearfield phase is well established and based on physical principles tested against laboratory and field studies (Roberts at al. 1989). A nearfield model, designed for submerged multi-port diffusers, was used in this study to estimate the parameters of the established waste-water plume. Once a plume is established, dispersion of the plume takes place by transport and mixing processes of the turbulent oceanic environment during'the farrmid phase.' The established plume, after the completion of the nearfield phase, is considered neutrally buoyant however, It contains sewage particles, some of which sink out of the plume and eventually come to rest on the bottom. Since many pollutants and bacteria are associated with particles, It is useful to estimate concentrations of sewage material/particles on the shelf seabed. In this study,the method used to estimate the faKeld fate of sewage material was to approximate the concentrations of a number of classes of particles in the established plume by a limited number of comparable artificial or surrogate particles. These particles were introduced at regular Intervals and then moved by the ambient currents,with the sequential position of each surrogate panicle being tracked and recorded. The time and space varying current field was approximated using observations from an array of moored Instruments by the Ocean Currents BPS. Thus, calculations using current observations and regularly Introduced surrogate panicles could be used to estimate the statistical distribution of plume material impacting the bottom over the San Pedro shelf. This method was also used to estimate the probability that any given region or pan of the water column would encounter a cloud of plume material. This latter characterization is often known as a visitation frequency. Near0eld Model Based on diffuser geometry, discharge history, and local environmental conditions, the nearneld model estimated that the presence of a local pycnocline at 25-30 in depth during summer precluded surfacing of the plume wastewater plume. During winter months, when weak stratification reduced buoyancy forces that tend to Inhibit the Initial vertical rise of the plume, the plume reached the surface for three relatively limited duration events.The wastewater plume was estimated to be in the upper 10 in of the water column only during winter and for only—0.8% of the year,or 74 hours. All modeled characteristics of plume geometry varied in response to changes In stratification, discharge rate, and currents in the lower layer at the diffuser. Diminishing the variation of the independent variables tended to reduce the magnitude of the variation of the modeled variables. The lowest dilution — greatest concentration — of wastewater within the nearfleld plume was approximately 100 pans ambient water to one pan plume water(100:1). On other occasions,the maximum concentration in the near6eld plume was as low as approximately 800 pans ambient water to 1 part plume water (800:1)with a mean maximum dilution ratio of 262:1 when averaged over the entire modeled year. Panicle Tracking Model Based on the three general size classes used to track plume particulate material neutrally buoyant panicles constituted approximately 90% of material discharged from the diffuser. Approximately, 86% of this size class was transported out of the model domain by the currents. Approximately 7% of the discharged material were slowing sinking panicles, and approximately 30%of these were also transported out of the model domain prior to contacting the bottom. The more rapidly sinking panicles constituted only about 3% of the discharged material, but accounted for a proportionately higher amount of settled panicles. The depth of panicle accumulation resulting from this one year of plume discharge, combined with the model assumptions regarding void ratios, etc. produced relatively thin layers of material (generally less than 0.5 mm)over the model grid.Areas In which total accumulation was greater than 0.5 rem were relatively small(-6.6 km')and pdmadly located onshore and downcoasl from the diffuser. Computation of visitation frequency,which reflects the percent of time a given point in the water column is affected by the plume, Indicated that over the entire year of observations, plumes of age 5 days or less encompassed essentially most of the adjacent shelf and slope. During summer, the region of influence of plumes with ages of one day or less was confined to the offshore region and not found around the 20-m isobath north of the diffuser. During winter, the plume intersected the onshore region to a relatively greater extent,reflecting the seasonal pattern In the current fields. In total, model predictions regarding initial dilution, deposition fluxes, and visitation frequencies appeared to be reasonable based on comparisons with empirical data,for areas near the outfall. Relatively few data are available to assess the accuracy of model predictions at locations southeast of Newport Canyon or northwest of San Gabriel Canyon. Further, current data, and predicted particle transport pathways at locations beyond a few kilometers from the ouffali area are probably less reliable. Huntington Beach (HB) Phase III Study [These reports will be provided when they are completed. They are scheduled to be completed within the next few months.] Initial results from these studies demonstrate: • Plumes rapidly diluted near the outfall; • Plumes may be transported up to several kilometers upcoast and downcoasl from the outfall, but the primary transport directions are along the isobaths. Some cross-shelf dispersion/transport occurs, but there is no compelling evidence that the plume Is transported onto the shore; • Plumes may approach the shoreline near the head of Newport Canyon, but there Is no evidence that plumes surface. Also, there is no evidence that effluent-derived contaminants are accumulating in sediments within the head of the canyon; • Effluent particles contribute approximately 10%of the panicle flux near the outfall,versus 1% of the particle flux at the 60-m reference site and less than 0.1% of the particle flux in Newport Canyon; • Of those particles settling to the bottom, only a fraction is incorporated into the bottom sediments; the major portion Is removed by chemical/biological decomposition and/or physical transport off the shelf. Comparison with Empirical Results from the Ocean Monitoring Program Some of the sediment quality parameters have been altered by the wastewater discharges, particularly within the zone of initial dilution. Statistical comparisons among the 60-m station groups indicate significant (p<0.05) spatial differences in sediment total organic carbon (TOC) concentrations. Concentrations at the within-ZID/upcoast and within-ZID/ downcoast sites are higher, while concentrations at the nearfield/downcoast stations are lower, than those at the reference sites. For the period 1997-01, significant temporal trends in sediment TOC concentrations at the 60-m stations are also indicated, although rates of change (time by area interactions)are not significantly different for individual station groups. These temporal trends are consistent with observed changes in sediment texture. Concentrations of selected metals and some trace organic contaminants are elevated in sediments near the oufall compared to concentrations at the reference location. However,the magnitude of these spatial differences and,therefore,the influence of the wastewater discharges on these sediment constituents is relatively small. Average concentrations of individual metals typically vary among station groups by a factor of two or less. The exceptions are cadmium and silver, with average concentrations for the within- ZID/upcoast station groups that are approximately three to five times higher than those associated with the other station groups. RMANOVA results for individual metals indicate significant spatial differences for cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, and silver, and significant temporal trends for arsenic, beryllium, chromium, copper, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc. Those metals exhibiting significant spatial differences are characterized by higher concentrations at the within-ZID/upcoast stations than the reference sites. Cadmium, copper, and silver concentrations at within-ZID/downcoast stations, and cadmium and silver concentrations at nearfield/upwast stations, are also significantly higher than those at the reference stations. RMANOVA results for total PAH concentrations indicate significant spatial differences among station groups;concentrations at the within-ZIDlupwast sites are greater than those at the reference sites. Temporal trends in total PAH concentrations are not statistically significant. Analyses of total DDT concentrations at the 60-m stations do not indicate significant differences among station groups. In contrast, RMANOVA indicates statistically higher total PCB concentrations for both the within-ZID/upwast and nearfield/upcoast station groups relative to the reference stations. RMANOVA results also indicate significant temporal trends(decreasing concentrations)for total DDT and PCBs during 1997-01. Changes in total DDT concentrations are occurring at the same rate for each of the station groups,suggesting that temporal trends are related to regional processes rather than discharge effects. Conversely,changes for total PCBs are occurring at different rates,and the rate of change for within-ZID/upwast sites appears to be greater than those for other station groups. It is not possible to evaluate the relation between trends in concentrations of trace organic contaminants in sediments to those in the District's effluent because the effluent concentrations are below(with some minor exceptions)the respective detection limits of the EPA-recommended analytical protocols.Although the"not detected'results from the effluent analyses do not provide a quanfitative basis for evaluating the correlation between effluent particles and sediment concentrations,the higher rate of change in PCB concentrations in near-outtall sediments are likely related in pan to improving effluent quality. Although concentrations of some trace contaminants are elevated in sediments within the immediate vicinity of the District's ouffall,data from the monitoring program demonstrate that the District's wastewater discharge does not substantially reduce the quality of bottom sediments in a manner that degrades biological communities. Sediment quality near the District's ouffall does not result in significant impacts to bottom-dwelling organisms. This conclusion is supported by results from numerous sediment toxicity tests and the lack of significant correlations between sediment contaminant concentrations and biological parameters(OCSD 1996a).The general absence of adverse biological effects Is consistent with the relatively low contaminant concentrations present in bottom sediments near the outfall. Section 125.122(a)(3) — The composition and vulnerability of the biological communities which may be exposed to such pollutants, Including the presence of unique species or communities of species, the presence of species Identified as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act or the presence of those species critical to the structure of function of the ecosystem,such as those important to the food chain. The requirements of Section 403 of the Clean Water Act are intended to ensure that no unreasonable degradation of the marine environment occurs as the result of the discharge and that sensitive ecological communities are protected(EPA undated). Detailed descriptions of biological communities in the region of the wastewater discharge,including evaluations of potential impacts to these communities,are presented in Appendices D.6, D.7, D.9,and D.12. Summaries of these results and conclusions are provided in Sections 125.122(a)(5)and(7)and 125.124(e). These data indicate that no significant long-term impacts to these communities are evident as a result of the wastewater discharge,some historical(e.g.,pre-1985)patterns continue to show improvement, and a balanced indigenous population is being maintained beyond the zone of initial dilution. Endangered Specks Twenty-seven species covered under the Endangered Species Act and/or the Marine Mammal Protection Act may be present In the vicinity of the Orange County ocean ouffall: eight marine mammals, eight birds,live sea turtles,four fish,and two invertebrates(Appendix D.12). Six of the eight species of great whales that pass through Orange County coastal waters are endangered: the blue whale, the fin whale, the humpback whale, the right whale, the set whale, and the sperm whale. These endangered whales primarily occur in deep water well offshore. The other two great whales,the gray whale and the minks whale,frequent shallower water. They were previously listed as endangered but have now recovered and have been delisted. Two other endangered marine mammals, the Guadalupe fur seal and the Steller sea lion, are occasional but uncommon visitors to Orange County offshore waters. Of the eight species of endangered birds,only the California brown pelican, California least tem, and elegant tern would be regularly encountered in marine waters off Orange County. Five species of endangered sea turtles occasionally visit Orange County ocean waters: green, loggerhead,leatherback,olive Ridley,and hawksbill.They forage along the California coast In the summer and early fall but do not nest on the west mast beaches of the United States. The three endangered salmon species are uncommon in southern California. The diminished populations of the deep-water sea bass, bocaccto,and while and black abalone are well beyond the influence of the OCSD ouffall. Operation of the Orange County ouffell could potentially impact marine mammals through btoaccumulation of discharged constituents. Recent research suggests, however, that bioaccumulation of toxic compounds is not a significant issue for baleen whales. They typically inhabit deep water(away from nearshore sources of contamination)and feed at a low level in the food web. The blue whale, fin whale, humpback whale, set whale, and right whale are baleen whales. The other endangered whale that may traverse the Orange County marine area, the sperm whale,also feeds at a relatively low level in the food chain and forages in deep water. The Guadalupe fur seal and the Steller sea lion are lop-level predators feeding primarily on fish. The low contaminant loads in Orange County marine fish should not pose a risk to such higher trophic-level carnivores. Bioaccumulation of toxic compounds from prey could also imperil endangered birds that forage off the Orange County coastline. However, contaminant burdens in local fish tissues are comparable to those at reference sites beyond the influence of the discharge and should not threaten endangered birds feeding in the area. Sea turtles, fish, and abalone should likewise be unaffected. Appendix D.12 gives a detailed description of endangered species potentially found in Orange County marine habitats. None of the endangered species that may occur in the vicinity of the Orange County ocean oudall are likely to be affected by the discharge. Section 125.122(a)(4) — The importance of the receiving water area to the surrounding biological community, Including the presence of spawning sites, nursery/forage areas, migratory pathways, or areas necessary for other functions of critical stages in the life cycle of an organisms. The requirements of Section 403 of the Clean Water Act are intended to ensure that no unreasonable degradation of the marine environment occurs as the result of the discharge and that sensitive ecological communities are protected(EPA undated). Detailed descriptions of biological communities in the region of the wastewater discharge,including evaluations of potential Impacts to these communities,are presented in Appendices D.6, D.7,D.9,and D.12. Summaries of these results and conclusions are provided in Sections 125.122(a)(5)and(7)and 125.124(e). These data indicate the importance of the receiving water area to a diveme and healthy biological community, but also emphasize that significant long-term impacts from the wastewater discharge are not evident,some historical(e.g.,pre-1985)effects continue to show improvement, and a balanced indigenous population is being maintained beyond the zone of initial dilution. Section 125.122(a)(5)—The existence of special aquatic sites including, but not limited to marine sanctuaries and refuges, parks, national and historic monuments, national seashores,wilderness areas and coral reefs. None of the special areas cited above exists in Orange County. The Orange County ocean outfall discharge is not located in a marine sanctuary. The closest marine sanctuary is the Santa Barbara Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary,more than 96 km(60 mi)to the northwest. No critical habitats are located in the vicinity of the Orange County ocean ouffall. The discharge area is characterized by soft bottom (sedimentary) habitat Hardbottom habitat such as reefs are confined to the nearshore zone. Known, historic kelp beds in Orange County are also found close to shore, but over 11 km(seven ml)from the oulfall. The sandy seafloor off Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, and Seal Beach does not support growth of the giant kelp, Macrocysds pynfera. There are nine Marine Protected Areas(MPAs)in the region(see Appendix E). The closest - the Newport Beach Marine Life Refuge/Area of Special Biological Significance-is 12 km(7.5 ml) away from the oudall. The other eight MPAs range from 13-39 km(8-24 mi)from the oudall. None are expected to be affected by the present or proposed modified discharge. Section 125.122(a)(6)—The potential impacts on human health through direct and indirect pathways. The requirements of Section 403 of the Clean Water Act are intended to ensure that no unreasonable degradation of the marine environment occurs as the result of the discharge and that sensitive ecological communities are protected (EPA undated). In general, wastewaters comprising effluent from municipal and industrial sources may contain trace quantities of chemical pollutants. If present at sufficient levels, chemical pollutants in wastewaters discharged to the ocean may be harmful to marine organisms or marine communities, thereby resulting in adverse ecological effects. The two potential human exposure pathways related to the Disbict's discharge are: • Direct contact with the effluent plume/plume constituents through body contact;and • Consumption of seafood affected by wastewater-derived contaminants. These pathways are discussed below. Exposures to Pathogens Via Body Contact OCSD currently releases 245 million gallons per day (MGD) of a blend of advanced primary treated and secondary treated wastewater. The treated wastewater is released 42 miles off shore in 200 feet of water. The current blend is 50:50 (50 percent advanced primary to 50 percent secondary). Plant No. 1 treats approximately 90 MGD, all of which receives advanced primary treatment. Approximately, 60 MGD receives secondary treatment through trickling filters or the activated sludge plant Plant No. 2 treats approximately 155 MGD, all of which receives advanced primary treatment. Sixty-five (65) MGD also receives secondary treatment through the oxygen activated sludge plant. Flows from Plant No. 1 are sent to Plant No. 2 through Interplant pipelines. Flows are then blended and pumped to the ocean ouffall. Current ocean permit requirements (for 30-day average discharge) are approximately 100 mgfL of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and 60 mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS). Currently, the average values for OCSD's treated wastewater are 60 mgfL BOD and 49 mg/L TSS, well within the permitted limits. OCSD has an extensive, nationally recognized, ocean-monitoring program as required by the EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. This program includes monitoring 17 different and specific offshore locations around the outlall, quarterly for various parameters such as temperature, salinity, and E. coil bacteria. Additionally, 17 stations on the shoreline are sampled 3-5 times a week for total and fecal bacteria, and enteroceoci bacteria. The monitoring is performed to ensure compliance with permit requirements for the treated wastewater released from the ouffall pipe. During February 2002 OCSD's water quality survey immediately preceding and following a Santa Ana wind event. During the pre-wind surveys, indicator bacteria were detected at depth, greater than 25 meters, at the monitoring stations in Newport Canyon. In the survey immediately following the winds, currents were going down-coast and tides were high. On that day, bacteria were detected higher in the water column at most monitoring stations and at the surface at one station approximately 3 miles off Newport Beach. At another station, approximately h mile off Newport Beach at a depth of approximately 15 meters(45 feet)and bacterial indicators indicafive of the presence of low concentrations of treated wastewater were measured. While these data did not demonstrate that OCSD's release of effluent to the ocean impacted the beach, they suggest that a mechanism may exist whereby offshore winds mix deeper water into the surface layers carrying the treated wastewater release up to the surface or near surface. Regardless, these values did not exceed OCSD's applicable water quality standards which are derived from the California Ocean Plan and Santa Ana River Basin Plan and embodied in OCSD's NPDES permit. These consist of water contact recreational standards for indicator bacteria within the nearshore zone (out to 30-fool depth contour) and within ten feet of the surface in offshore waters. These limitations require that total celiform indicator bacteria levels bee less than 1DOD/ 100 ml and that no more than 20% of the samples can exceed 1000/ 100 ml and no single sample shall exceed 10,000/100 ml with a 2 day period. The corresponding requirements for the more restrictive fecal coliform limit is a 30-day geometric mean of 2001100 mil and not more than 10% of the samples in a 6D-day period can exceed 4001100 mi. Other nearshore water quality standards have been promulgated under the provisions of AB411 which are shown below as part of the Mission Statement for the proposed project, and these standards were also not exceeded during the unusual event noted above. Based on this Receiving Water Quality study,it appears that, in conjunction with Santa Ana winds and exceptionally high tides, the treated wastewater plume can come within % mile of the shore and be present higher in the water column than was previously measured. In order to eliminate any possibility that the treated wastewater released to the ocean is adversely affecting surfzone or receiving water quality standards, staff was authorized by the Board of Directors to evaluate a bacteria-reduction process. A bacteria-reduction process will be used to accomplish a reduction of bacteria in the treated wastewater to assure compliance with water quality standards. To clarify the specific project objectives, OCSD staff developed a Mission Statement for the project which is shown below: OCSD will beat its effluent discharge to reduce effluent pathogen levels. The pathogen reduction facilities will be operated year-round under dry weather and wet weather now conditions to achieve Assemby Bin 411 (1997) recreational bathing water standards(30 day geometric mean value) for total colilorm, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacteria in the receiving water upon discharge of the treated effluent from the oudell pipe. The facilities will be operated to meet all applicable California Ocean Plan requirements for water quality protection.' 'AS 411 refers to Assembly Bill 411 (1997) which required the California Department of Health Services to adopt beach sanitation standards., Indicator Single sample maximum 30 day geometric mean Total Conform 10,000 MPW100 ml 1,000 Fecal Colnorm 400 MPW10O ml 200 Enterococcus 104MPN1100ml 35 Since initialing this proposal, the two agencies responsible for regulating the Distils discharge have reviewed the situation and proposed a NPDES permit modification which requires the District to implement this program. The requirement is for immediate implementation (by August 12,2002)and is still a cautionary, preventive decision, and not based on any known violations of water quality standards. Nonetheless, it requires immediate ministerial action on behalf of the District,and thus CEOA compliance is not required other than the completion of this addendum. The facilities comprising the project consist of tanks,piping,injection facilities and instrumentation and monitoring equipment for the addition of sodium hypochlorite (liquid bleach) a powerful disinfectant and sodium bisulfite(a common chemical used for reacting with any residual chlorine to reduce it to levels needed to meet water quality standards and reduce potential toxicity). The project enclosed sodium hypochlonte tanks,dosing facilities,storage tanks for sodium bisulfite for dechlorination, and various safety and controllmonitoring equipment. Storage exists for enough chemical to sustain seven days of operation. The 1999 Orange County Sanitation District Strategic Plan (CDM, 1999) did not contain a conceptual plan for the proposed disinfection facilities since they were only recently proposed. The Strategic Plan was the subject of a 1999 Program EIR (Environmental Science Associates, 1999) which addressed the use of both treatment plant sites for a variety of treatment facilities and a wide range of support facilities through the year 2020 and beyond. The pathogen reduction program consists of the following facilities and operational modes: The bleach dosing is done at two different locations at each plant. Dosing at two locations will allow OCSD to use a smaller concentration of bleach and effectively use chemical for the reduction of bacteria. Additionally, dosing rates at Plant No.2 are higher than at Plant No. 1, due to the shorter contact time available at Plant No. 2. Anticipated yearly chemical consumption at Plants No. 1 and 2 Is 2,200,000 and 6,900,000 gallons, respectively, for a total of 9,100,000 gallons per year.The Plant No.1 and No.2 chemical consumption is based on 60-minute and 20- minute contact time, respectively. Shorter contact time for Plant No.2 may require higher bleach rates to achieve bacteria reduction. The dechlorination rate is based on 10 to 20 mgn and is anticipated at estimated to require 3,700,000 gallons of sodium bisulphite per year. Exposures Via Seafood Consumption The District's ocean monitoring program requires regular assessments of chemical contaminants in tissues (bioaccumulation)of bottom-dwelling fish. The District uses tissue contaminant data in part to evaluate whether bioaccumulation of contaminants in fish tissues is occurring and if it represents a potential threat to human health. Results from contaminant bioaccvmulation in fish are discussed in greater detail in Appendix D.10. From 1985 to 1997 (Phase 1301(h) Ocean Monitoring Program), the Districts analyzed muscle tissues of key resident fish species collected near the oulfall as a basis for estimating potential exposures to humans that regularly consumed fish from the outtall area.An important assumption of these studies is that the relative magnitudes of tissue contaminant concentrations are directly related to the exposure conditions where the organisms are collected. Chemical contaminants in tissues measured for the Ocean Monitoring Program may originate from multiple sources, and thus are not unique to the District's wastewater discharge. Further, since the exposure histories or range of movement for organisms analyzed for this program are poorly known, it is not possible to verify the source(s)of contamination. Therefore,conclusions regarding effects based solely on spatial patterns in tissue contaminant concentrations must be made with caution. Results from these analyzed demonstrated the following: • Contaminant concentrations in edible portions of fish and macroinverlebmtes potentially consumed by humans were below the potential respective action and health advisory limits: • Results of human health assessments, conducted following EPA protocols, indicated sporadic and minor potentials for excess cancer and non-cancer risks. The excess risks were attributable to elevated concentrations of total arsenic, mercury, and PCBs in some samples. Risks associated with arsenic were considered biased on the high side because only a portion of the arsenic, associated with the inorganic arsenic portion, represented a potential risk, and this form of arsenic typically represented a small fraction of the total concentration. Risks associated with mercury were assodated larger and older individuals of certain, higher-trophic level species such as barred sand bass. Separate studies indicated that mercury accumulation in these fish was not related to the District's discharge. Furthermore, no fishing activity near the District's oudall, sufficient to support the long-term exposure conditions assumed by the EPA risk assessment protocols,occurs. Therefore,the risk potential associated with seafood consumption is considered insignificant. • Based on a regional human health risk study, the California State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment recommended no restrictions on human consumption of any of the fish species evaluated from the Huntington Beach area,and recommended only restricted consumption (one meal every two weeks) of California corbina (Menticinhus undulatusl caught near Newport Pier (OEHHA 1991). Because California corbina is a neamhore- dwelling species, it is unlikely that contaminants associated with this species were derived from the District's discharge. During 1998-01, a total of 412 tissue samples from seven species were collected and analyzed for the Ocean Monitoring Program. Additional fish tissue samples were collected and analyzed by the District for the 1997 regional fish study coordinated by SCCWRP and for the Bight'98 regional monitoring program. Analyses of fish issues during 1998-00 did not indicate significant contaminant concentrations due to the wastewater discharge or suggest that marine communities or organisms were degraded by the wastewater discharge. Where sufficient numbers of samples were analyzed to support statistical testing of tissue contaminant concentralions in fish from near-ouffall and reference locations, most differences were not statistically significant. Further, concentrations of individual chemicals in most fish tissue samples analyzed for the Ocean Monitoring Program were comparable to respective levels reported from other areas of the Southern California Bight that are removed from direct human influences. Low-level contamination of tissues with DDT and PCBs may represent exposures to residues from historical sources. Thus, results from the 199MO Ocean Monitoring Program did not indicate significant impacts from the wastewater discharge to tissue contaminant concentrations in fish. Section 125.122 (a)(7) — Existing or potential recreational and commercial fishing, Including finfishing and shellfishing. The requirements of Section 403 of the Clean Water Act are intended to ensure that no unreasonable degradation of the marine environment occurs as the result of the discharge and that biological communities(including fish and shellfish resources) are protected (EPA undated). This section provides a summary of the existing and potential recreational and commercial fisheries. As detailed in Appendix E, both commercial and recreational fisheries are located off the Orange County coast. The information summarized from Appendix E below describes in detail the types and locations of fisheries,fishing methods,fish ecology,and fishery economics. Commercial Fishing The primary focus of commercial fishing in Orange County from 1996-2001 was Pacific sardine, Pacific and jack mackerel, northern anchovy and market squid. Collectively termed the Coastal Pelagic Species, or CPS, these schooling species are caught by purse seining vessels (a purse seine is an encircling net that is closed by means of a purse line threaded through rings on the bottom of the net). CPS are typically caught in surface water and at mid-depth in the water column (California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) 2001). The CPS were the most important element of the regional commercial catch in terms of weight and value. The CPS,with a combined average yearly value of$29.478,635, represented 97% of the overall catch value of commercial fisheries in the area during the period 1997-2001 (Table 2:Appendix E). Catches of Pacific sardine far outpaced all other species, topping 13 million kg (28 million lb) in 1999 and again in 2000 (Table 2: Appendix E). The value of the Pacific sardine catch averaged over $25 million per year during the five-year period 1997-2001. Mackerel landings were relatively steady over the same period averaging over $3 million per year. Catches of anchovy ranged from a low of 75.907 kg (167,347 lb)in 1998 to a high of over 453,592 kg(1 million lb) in 2000. The yearly value ranged from a low of$45.532 in 1998 to a high of$1,113,829 in 2000. The average value for anchovy during the period was$551,107 per year. The squid catch varied from a low of 94,874 kg (209,161 lb) in 1998 (El Nino conditions of 1997 & 1998 caused a collapse of the squid fishery as well as other fisheries 1998)to a high of 1,360,777 kg 93 million Ib)In 2001. Catch value,however,was not as variable,with a low of$52,965 in 1998 and a high of$352,460 for the 532,947 pound catch in 1999. The recent record 3 million pound catch in 2001 by contrast brought only $342.300 illustrating the relationship of supply and demand in a free market system. Catches of California halibut ranged from 10,096 kg (22,258 lb)in 1997 to 31,760 kg (70,018 lb) in 1999 (Table 2: Appendix Q. The average value of the catch was $137,389 per year. The prawn catch varied widely during the five-year period,from a low of only 450 kg(991 lb) in 1998 to a high of 15,650 kg (34,502 lb) in 2000. Over the five-year period the catch value averaged $133,258 per year. Because of the relative scarcity of rocky substrate locally, lobster catches are low when compared to areas with extensive rocky bottoms and kelp beds. The lobster catch ranged from 4,654 kg (10,260 lb)to 7,497 kg (16,527 lb) during 1997-2001. averaging $91,5271year. Shark, white seabass, yellowtail, and white croaker all had average yearly catches worth more than $50,000 per year. Sablefish and California barracuda had average landed values of$38,159 and $36,571 per year and thresher shark had an average landed value of$22,096 during the 1997- 2001 periods. During the warm water El Nino year of 1998 over 13,608 kill (thirty thousand pounds) of tuna (albacore, bluefin and yellowfin)were caught in the area with for a value of$60,357. Rock crabs are caught in traps out to depths of 122 m (400 ft)off Orange County. The crab trap fishery averaged$8,403 yearly. Rockfish are caught by hook and line (both by trolling and long-lining), and with set gill nets and trawl nets beyond the three-mile limit. Catches by hook and line bring top prices and rockfish are often sold live to restaurants. The rockfish catch (all species combined) averaged $8,114 per year. The sea urchin take, so important in other areas such as off the Point Loma kelp bed in San Diego(Woffson and Glinski 1985, 1986. 1999)only averaged about$3,000 per year for this area of Orange County. Overall, the total combined landed value of commercial fisheries in the vicinity of the OCSD ocean outfall Is a substantial,$30 million dollars per year. Recreational Fishing Sportfishing in Orange County is done mostly from piers and boats. A flourishing commercial passenger and private fishing vessel fleet, based In Newport Bay, operates in the vicinity of Newport and Huntington Beach. Charter boats, known in the trade as commercial passenger fishing vessels(CPFVs)provide bait,gear rental,food service,fish cleaning,and transportation to fishing grounds for paying passengers on half-day, three-quarter day, full day and twilight tops. CPFVs operating off Newport and Huntington fish the artificial reefs and sandy bottom, or the rocky areas and kelp beds to the south off Corona Del Mar and Laguna. The CPFVs and private boats operating In the area typical target similar fish and concentrate on areas in depths of 14-18 m(45-60 ft). The principal sportfish caught In the vicinity of Orange County were barred sand bass, barracuda, kelp bass, Pacific mackerel, scarpionfish, yellowtail, various rocklish, ocean whitefish and a variety of other finfish. The elevated catch of albacore, yellowfin and skip jack tuna in 1997-1999 was associated with the warts waters created by the El Nino event of those years (Table 3: Appendix E). The CPFV catch per angler varied between 45 fish from 1996-2000 (Table 3: Appendix E). This fishing productivity was the same as reported statewide during the period. Nationwide In 1998, there were an estimated 9.5 million saltwater anglers who took 60 million trips and caught 312 million fish(Hogarth 2000). This averages 5 fish per trip nationwide-similar to that off Orange County even though Orange County is one of the most densely populated coastal areas In the country. - The amount of local fishing from piers and private boats is probably about 10%to 20%that of the CPFV. A limited amount of seafood is harvested by sport divers off Newport and Huntington Beach. Virtually all of the sportfishing by divers in this area takes place along the ocean-side of the Newport Harbor west jetty. Little sportfishing by divers occurs at the groins built to control beach erosion,around the piers, and at the offshore artificial reefs. Divers seek primarily lobster, crab, and halibut A small number of dives are made over sandy bottom to seek halibut and shellfish. Economic Value of Fisheries Landed value is the first level of direct economic benefit considered in determining the total value a fishery. More direct value is added as the product passes through the wholesale and retail levels of the economy,providing additional wages,profits,and tax revenue. Like all industries, the commercial seafood industry affects other sectors of the economy. In addition to direct values, there are indirect values that arse when other Industries provide goods and services to the businesses directly involved in the fishery. For example, to participate in a fishery a fisherman has to buy, outfit, license, and operate a vessel,and hire crew. Finally,there are induced values that are generated when money made at the direct and indirect levels is spent and then 'ripples through the rest of the economy. Indirect and induced values are usually expressed in terms of multipliers that vary for each industry. For marine commercial and recreational fishing, indirect and induced values are estimated to increase landed value by a factor (multiplier) of two to three (UCSDISIO 1986, Hogarlh 2000, Pacific Fishery Management Council 2001 a). Thus, since the landed value of commercial fisheries from Blocks 738 8 739 averaged $30 million per year from 1997-2001 (Table 2:Appendix E), the total economic benefit would be around $60-90 million per year. The U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service estimates that nationwide in 1998, an estimated 9.5 million saltwater anglers took 60 million fishing trips,caught 312 million fish,and spent$8.5 billion - creating an economic impact of $25 billion (Hogarth 2000). For the coastal area fished by Orange County sport anglers, this translates to an estimated $10 milliontyear in direct value and $20-30 milliorlyear in total economic benefit assuming a multiplier of two to three. So,the estimated direct value of commercial and recreational fishing from the local area Is$40 million per year. The estimated total economic benefit from regional fisheries would be$80-120 million per year,including direct,indirect,and,induced value. Section 125.122(a)(8)-Any applicable requirements of an approved Coastal Zone Management plan. There are no known requirements on the discharge from the Coastal Zane Management Plan. Section 125.122 (a)(9)-Such other factors relating to the effects of the discharge that may be appropriate. This application contains extensive information regarding the wastewater treatment facilities, effluent quality and receiving water environment so that the effects of the discharge on the marine environment may be reasonable evaluated. Section 125.122(a)(10)-Marine water quality criteria developed pursuant to section 304(a)(1). The discharge has achieved consistent compliance with the requirements of the California Ocean Plan as discussed in Appendix D. The California Ocean Plan has stricter water quality criteria than those promulgated under section 304(a)(1). Section 125.122(b)-Discharges in compliance with section 301(g),301(h),or 316(a) variance requirements or State water quality standards shall be presumed not to cause unreasonable degradation of the marine environment,for any specific pollutants or conditions specified in the variance or the standard. Since 1985,the discharge has been permitted under a 301(h)permit,and it has consistently achieved compliance with the requirements of this permit including the State of California Water Quality Standards as applied through the California Ocean Plan and Basin Plan for the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. As such,the discharge is presumed not to cause an unreasonable degradation of the marine environment for all of the pollutants and conditions specified in these plans. For details,we Appendices A and D. Section 125.124-Information required to be submitted by applicant. The applicant is responsible for providing Information which the director may request to make the determination required by this subpart.The director may require the following information as well as any other pertinent information: Section 125.124(a)-An analysis of the chemical constituents of any discharge; A detailed list of influent,effluent and receiving water monitoring data has been previously submitted to the EPA and RWQCB through monthly discharge monitoring reports and the annual ocean monitoring reports. Attachment 3 of NPDES Application Form 2A also contains detailed effluent monitoring data. Section 125.124(b)-Appropriate bloassays necessary to determine the limiting permissible concentrations for the discharge; A detailed list of effluent monitoring data has been previously submitted to the EPA and RWQCB through monthly discharge monitoring reports.Attachment 5 of the NPDES Application Form 2A contains detailed whole effluent toxicity testing data accumulated under the current permit requirements. Section 125.124(c)-An analysts of initial dilution; Appendix M is a detailed analysis of the initial dilution of the effluent based on extensive ocean monitoring data accumulated during the current permit. Section 125.124(d)-Available process modifications which will reduce the quantities of pollutants which will be discharged; The requirements of Section 403 of the Clean Water Act are intended to ensure that no unreasonable degradation of the marine environment occurs as the result of the discharge and that sensitive ecological communities are protected (EPA undated). This section provides a summary of the treatment facilities available to meet permit requirements and the operation plans developed since the District decided to move to a higher level of treatment in July 2002. The first activity undertaken in response to the Board Directive on July 17, 2002 was to form a "30130 Action Team"consisting of key District employees representing all Departments along with consultants working on the Strategic Plan and pernitting. It was decided to prepare an Operational Plan that would describe the 'ramping-up" of existing treatment facilities to achieve better effluent quality along with the manner in which flows would be handled through the end of the next permit period (June 2008). Included in the Operations Plan is the start-up of the GWR System scheduled for 2007. The available treatment processes, the quality of water they will produce and the final effluent quality estimated to be produced through the permit period is detailed in the Operational Plan shown in Appendix O. The amount of secondary effluent produced will vary depending upon the on-line availability of facilities during scheduled rehabilitation during the next five years. Another factor that will dramatically effect effluent quality Is the start-up of the GWR System which will divert up to 103 MGD of flow and result in return of microfiller backwash and reverse osmosis reject(brine)which will impact effluent quality by returning concentrated streams for treatment (backwash) or for direct discharge (brine high in ammonia and concentrations of metals from secondary effluent). The greatest concerns at this time are the impact on whole effluent toxicity which is the subject of on-going evaluation. One major planning effort will focus on the need for side-stream treatment to target ammonia. Section 125.124(a)—Analysis of the location where pollutants are sought to be discharged,Including the biological community and the physical description of the discharge facility; This section provides a summary of the physical description of the discharge and the biological community in the discharge region. Physical Description of Discharge Facility This information is provided in Section 125.122(a)(1)and Appendix B. Biological Community Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP) studies conducted by the District since 1985 in accordance with 301(h) waiver requirements have focused on evaluating changes in biological conditions related to the wastewater discharge. These evaluations are based on community measures(e.g., number of species, abundance, biomass, and diversity indices) for infaunal Invertebrates, epifaunal macrolnvertebmtes (EMI), and demersal (bottom-dwelling) fish communities. Community measures for infauna are sampled seasonally (quarterly) at the ouffall depth and annually (summer) at various depths and distances from the cattail. Community measures for demersal fish and macroinvertebrates(i.e.,trawl-collected organisms)are sampled semi-annually In summer and winter. Detailed descriptions of the communities and discharge-related effects to infauna and trawl-collected species are provided In Appendices D.7 and D.9, respectively, and a synopsis of results Is presented In Part 11.13 for the 301(h) evaluations. Other biological communities (e.g., plankton, birds, and mammals) are not studied as part of the OMP because there is no evidence from previous studies that these components of the marine ecosystem are affected by the wastewater discharges. Literature-based summaries of these other communities are detailed in Appendices D.6 and D.12 and summarized in the sections addressing 125.122(a)(3)and(5). For the infauna and trawl-collected species, changes in community measures near the outtall structure (acting as a large artificial reel), but not at reference areas, are Inferred to result from either the wastewater discharge or reef effects. It is assumed that changes in community measures at farfield reference stations are related to natural or regional influences, while gradients relative to the outtall may be due to either discharge or reef effects or combinations of these two effects. Reef effects were distinguished from assessments of community measures at different distances from the cattail structure (pipe and ballast)but away from the Influence of the wastewater discharge. Both reef and wastewater discharge effects contribute to the spatial patterns of organisms within a few hundred meters of the outtall diffuser, whereas patterns extending beyond this distance are believed to result entirely from discharge impacts (Diener at al. 1997;OCSD 1996, 1997, 1998a). Reef effects are related to the presence of the physical structure of the pipe and associated ballast rock (representing one of the largest subtidal, artificial reefs in the Southern California Bight), which modifies bottom current patterns and speeds. This modification causes sediment erosion on the up-current side of the pipe and deposition on the down-current side, and these changes in sediment can in turn affect biological communities. Additionally, reefs are inhabited by a large number of predators that feed on adjacent soft bottom organisms, and this feeding activity alters spatial patterns of biota near the pipe/reef structure. Both the physical disruption and harboring of reef predators occurs whether the reef is natural or artificial, and effects occur independent of any discharges. Discharge effects on the biota can be either direct (e.g., enhancement of infaunal abundance due to increased food supply or a depression of abundance due to contaminants) or indirect (e.g., larger fish occurring near the outtall because of the increase in infaunal prey items). These two effects produce different types of responses with different spatial styles that overlap near the ouffall diffuser(OCSD 1995, 1996; Diener and Riley 1996;Diener at al. 1997). Mapping of community measures provides a method for assessing the spatial and temporal patterns of the biota, thereby providing a visual reference for evaluating the extent, persistence, and significance of discharge and regional effects. Thus,the OMP provides important information to evaluate environmental health based on the response of the organisms. Furthermore, maintenance of a balanced indigenous population (BIP) is a compliance.requirement to ensure that discharge effects are not significantly degrading nearfield biological communities. A BIP detennination compares the community near the ouffall with nearby healthy communities that exist under similar but un-impacted conditions. "Healthy communities typically are characterized by many species having moderate abundances (i.e.. not dominated by a few opportunistic and/or tolerant species) and an ability to adapt to a range of typical, nature] environmental conditions. High abundance of a few species may indicate environmental stress, such as conditions where a few species that are tolerant of chemical contaminants or high organic loadings dominate,or may indicate an ideal habitat for a species to maximize its reproductive potential. If an impact is significant, normal community function may be disrupted, possibly leading to changes in community composition and trophic (food web) function. If impacts are severe, the community may be completely lost. Results from the District's ocean monitoring program (OMP) have shown that natural features of the study area have a far greater influence on community composition than discharge and reef effects (OCSD Annual Reports 1986-2002). Biological communities respond to natural gradients in water depth and grain sae. These gradients and co-related variables(e.g.,wave disturbance, light, and particle organic carbon content) account for most of the differences in infaunal community composition and abundance. Seasonal and episodic variations in water temperature and river discharges (e.g., El Niho and La We influenced events) are also important. Human- related changes are caused by inputs of organic particles(which may serve as a food source and enhance communities) and chemical contaminants (which might be toxic and degrade communities)from wastewater and runoff sources(OCSD 1996). Results of the OMP since 1985 have shown that three main factors have contributed to altered community measures near the ouffall: (1) nearfield change in species composition caused by the ouffall acting as an artificial reef; (2) gradients in abundance and species composition related to the increased food supply (organic material) from the discharge; and (3) historically decreased abundance or absence of key species,such as the brittlestar Amphiodia urfice,over a portion of the study area,presumably due to historical (<1985) sediment contaminants (OCSD 1986, 1996, 2000. 2001, 2002). OMP results have consistently shown that impacts from the wastewater discharge on biota have been relatively minor with decreasing spatial extents over time. Infauna Communities Number of Species,Abundance,and Biomass Between August 1985 and May 2001 the OMP collected and identified over 2.3 million organisms representing 1,314 taxe. Appendix D.7 provides detailed information on the infaunal community by year for July 1998 to May 2001, with earlier results detailed in OCSD (1986-1998). The predominant infaunal groups In the study region are polychaete worms (e.g., 41.3% of the taxa and 56.5% of the individuals during 2000-01), followed by crustaceans, molluscs, minor phyla (e.g., ribbon worms and gat worms), and echinoderms (such as sea cucumbers and brdtlestars). The summer spatial distribution of the number of species/sample is detailed for 1998-99, 1999- 00, and 2000-01 in Appendix D.7. Summer surveys are emphasized as this season typically shows the strongest gradients, representing the maximum extent of discharge impacts, for community measures with distance from the outfall. In all three years the number of infaunal species generally decreased with water depth,with the highest number of species typically being found near the outfall diffuser and inshore of the diffuser. The fewest numbers of spades are found at deep stations and in the canyons. These findings are consistent with previous annual reports and other studies of the Southern California Bight(e.g.,Bergen at al. 1998). Repeated Measures ANOVA (RMANOVA) analysis (representing a statistical method that helps evaluate changes over time)of the number of species during quarterly surveys from August 1985 to April 2001 indicated no stgnificant effects from the wastewater discharge. This conclusion Is supported by the lack of differences among areas and no gradient or pattern with distance from the outfall (Appendix D.7). Generally, for both winter and summer surveys, the number of species(for quarterly surveys)is enhanced near the outall; however,this feature has varied from year to year and is less obvious in fall and spring and was not statistically significant. Enhancement near the diffuser Is due in part to the reef effect,which adds herd-bottom species to an otherwise soft-bottom habitat. The RMANOVA analysis also indicated that there were significant seasonal effects due to the typical pattern of more species in summer than winter, although this was less evident for 2000-01. Despite significant seasonal variability, the number of species appears to be increasing for non-reference areas faster than the reference area,although this increase is not statistically significant. It is notable that most areas now average more species than the reference area. The average number of species/sample exceeded 100 for almost all quarterly stations (Appendix D.7). All these values typically exceeded Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP)regional reference survey values(1985=67.7, 1990=83.4). The number of species In summer near and within the ZID exceeded regional reference areas. Based on the number of species present and comparisons with regional reference data, these results indicate that near- outfall and within-ZID stations support highly diverse infaunal communities and do not represent degraded habitat. Furthermore, the persistence of a high number of species near the outfall Is evidence that the infaunal community beyond the ZID is representative of a BIP. The summer spatial distribution of infaunal abundance/sample is detailed in Appendix D.7 for 1998-99, 1999-00,and 2000-01. These results indicate a general trend of decreasing abundance with water depth and the enhancement of infaunal abundance near the outtall. Decreasing abundance patterns with increasing water depth and proximity to the canyons is consistent with results from other monitoring studies of the Southern California Bight (e.g., Bergen at al. 1998; SCCWRP 1992). Analysis of changes over time (RMANOVA) in the quarterly abundance patterns from August 1985 to April 2001 (Appendix D.7) found significant differences among areas, with nearfield upcoast Stations 1 and 5 (NU), within-ZID upcoast Stations 0 and Z82 (WU), and within-ZID downcast Stations ZB and 4 (WD) having significantly higher abundance than Reference Stations C and Control. Nearfield downcoast Stations 9 and 12(ND)were not enhanced relative to the reference and are not considered degraded because the number of species at these locations is not significantly different than all other areas. This suggests that discharge effects are more pronounced upcoest of the diffuser then downcoast. consistent with predominant upcoast current directions near the bottom and footprints of elevated chemical concentrations in sediments (see Appendices D.1 and D.5). Seasonal patterns were typically significant, but less evident for 1998-2001 than seen in previous years (e.g., OCSD 1998 and earlier). Even after accounting for seasonal effects, temporal trends for decreasing abundances were still evident for all areas with comparable rates of decline (Appendix D.7). Similar to these area effects, there was a significant gradient in decreasing abundance with distance from the outfall. The slope of this gradient Is not changing through time, but abundance is declining at about the same rate at all distances from the outfall,suggesting regional influences. Enhanced abundance Is a predictable response to increased food supply(i.e., particulate organic carbon from the wastewater discharge). However, it is important that enhanced abundance of a few opportunistic species (e.g., the polychaele worm Capitelle 'capitafay has not mused a decrease in the overall number of Infaunal species (see above). Comparisons of summer 2000 abundance values with 1990 SCCWRP regional reference survey (SCCWRP 1992) date (625 organisms per sample) found lower abundance for all except three stations nearest the outfall diffuser (Stations 0, 4 and ZB) (Appendix D.7). Aside from these three stations, the summer 2000 values were generally equivalent to the more recent SCBPP (1994) study that found an average infaunal abundance of 545 near outlells and 443 away from outfalls. The localized area of enhanced abundance near the outfall depicts the spatial extent of measurable effects on the Infaunal community. It Is important that the area of enhanced abundance coincides with the area of greatest number of species. This supports the conclusion that enhanced abundance Is an ou0all effect, but has not caused a loss of community diversity. Therefore, outfall effects are localized, seasonal, and represent an enhancement rather then a degradation of the community. Consequently,a SIP Is present beyond the ZID boundary. Measurements of the weight (biomass) of biological organisms are greatly Influenced by the occurrence of occasional, large specimens and,therefore,are generally much more variable than other community measures. For the 1998-99, 1999-00,and 2000-01 monitoring periods,biomass tended to be highest Inshore of the outfall area (Appendix D.7) and generally followed the abundance patterns. There is no evidence of enhanced biomass near the outfall as historically typified responses to discharges from large wastewater outialls. RMANOVA for August 1985 to April 2001 revealed that the nearfield downcoast(ND)stations (9 and 12)had significantly lower biomass than other station groups (Table D.7-7). However, there was no significant gradient in biomass with distance from the oulfall.. When adjusted for seasonality, a temporal trend of decreasing biomass occurred at all station groups except NU,which is increasing(Appendix D.7). These trends for stations away from the outfall suggest that regional influences may be a factor. Diversity Indices Results from four diversity indices (based on the balance or imbalance of the number of species and their abundance), Shannon-Wiener (M), Evenness (Y), Dominance, and Margalef Species Richness (SR)showed similar patterns,with the highest values inshore of the ouffall, decreasing with depth offshore and proximity to canyons (Appendix D.7). However, diversity patterns near the ouffall were influenced by the indices selected. SR shows no indication of lower diversity near the ouffall bemuse this index generally reflects the number of species, which is not depressed near the outfall. In contrast, IT, X, and Dominance generally indicated slightly lower diversity near the ouffall terminus (less evident in 1998). These decreases result from the sensitivity of these diversity measures to the Inequitable distribution In abundance of the species found at these locations. Lower diversity measures near the ouffall mainly resulted from enhanced abundance of two opportunistic species, the polychaete Cepdelle 'capitals' (often considered to be an indicator species of organic enrichment and/or disturbance) and the microcruslacean (ostracod) Euphilomedes carcharodorim (generally the most abundant infaunal organism). When these species occur with enhanced abundance near the ouffall, diversity values based on indices that are sensitive to species abundance distribution indicate lower values than elsewhere. Thus, lower diversity values near the outfall stem from enhanced abundances of a few species relative to the other species at that location (i.e., the distribution is not equitable), and not because there are fewer species near the ouffall (Appendix D.7). It is of interest that the abundances of these two species varied from year to year, but when they were both present in high numbers (e.g., 1985, 1988,1989, 1994. 1996, and 2000), diversity values tended to be very low near the ouffall (see later discussion on Indicator Species). Analysis of changes over time (RMANOVA)for the quarterly stations from August 1985 to April 2001 showed similar patterns and trends for the four diversity indices (Appendix D.7), and for each index, significant area differences were found. Dominance was the most sensitive measure indicating lower diversity for all within-ZID (WD and WU) and nearfield (ND and NU) station groups compared to the reference. H'indicated significant differences for only three groups(ND, WD, and WU). In contrast SR and X were the least sensitive, finding differences only for those stations groups within the ZID (WD and WU), again indicating differences In the emphasis of diversity measures. All four measures had significant seasonal effects. When connected for seasonal changes, significant temporal trends of increasing diversity were evident for all Indices. These trends of increasing diversity values reflect temporal increases in the number of species and decreases in abundance for individual species over the study area. While all the indices show diversity increasing with time, only Dominance had significant differences in the rate of change for the different areas. The other diversity measures show similar pattems, but fell just shot of reaching statistical significance. All four measures showed gradients relative to distance from the outfall, but only SR showed a significant decrease in this gradient. The generally increasing Vend of diversity for all station groups suggests a regional effect promoting greater diversity in all areas and possibly a decreasing influence of the outfall. Infaunat Trophic Index(ITI) The ITI is an index that provides a measure of the"health'of the infaunal community(Word 1978; modified in 1980 (Version 2j). ITI values greater than 60 are considered indicative of"normal" communities, numbers between 30 and 60 represent'changed" communities, and values below 30 correspond to 'degraded' communities. Values below 60 are usually associated with wastewater discharges, but only values below 30 are considered indicative of negatively impacted communities (Bascom at al. 1978). The summer spatial patterns vary from year to year, but three general patterns are evident. First, there is a general depression of ITI values near the ouffall. Second, the area of this effect has declined through time, suggesting that impacts from the wastewater discharge have been declining through time. Thine ITI values for the nearshore portion of Newport Canyon(Station C2)tend to be lower than elsewhere. Analysis of changes over time(RMANOVA)in ITI values from August 1985 to April 2001 found significant differences in station groups:all within-ZID(WU and WD)and nearfield station groups (NU and ND)had lower ITI values than the reference area(Table D.7-7). This reflects a gradient in ITI values that are typically lower near the ouffall but variable from year to year(Appendix D.7). Long-term temporal trends indicate increasing ITI values for all areas and a rate of change that is not significantly different among the areas,thereby suggesting regional influences. The ITI Vends reflect patterns observed for the increasing number of species,decreasing abundance for individual species,and fewer opportunistic species near the ouffall(Maurer at al. 1999b). Indicator Species Indicator species are those organisms that show strong abundance gradients relative to the wastewater discharge and often dominate the calculation of community measures.Thus,patterns for these species largely delineate the spatial influence of the wastewater discharge. This section discusses four indicator species:ostracod,Euphilomedes carcharodonts,a clam.Pervilucina tenuisculpla, a polychaete, Capilells "capilsta", and a brittlestar,Amphiodia urtics. Euphilomedes carcharodonfa. Prior to 1997, this small crustacean consistently was the most abundant infaunal species over all stations within the study area, including relatively high number: near the ougall (Appendix D.7). However, the abundance of this species was significantly reduced In 1997-98, possibly due to warmer water associated with an El Nino event. The El Nino event of 1994-95 was associated with small changes In the spatial pattern of Euphilomedes, but abundance generally remained high near the outfall. In contrast, during the 1998 El Nino, abundance declined by over an order of magnitude and remained low until the spring of 2000,with values becoming more typical by summer 2000. Factors accounting for the slow recovery of this species appear to be related to winter storms and cold water temperatures associated with the more recent La Nifla event. Analysis of changes over time (RMANOVA)results indicates significant temporal changes but no significant area differences (Appendix D.7). This result largely reflects the dramatic changes in abundance for this species, especially during 1998 and 1999 when there were fewer animals overall. This extreme variation, especially near the oudall,has Introduced a considerable amount of variance in the average seasonal mean values and, consequently,the analysis no longer finds significant area differences based on 16 years of date. Seasonal changes were still significant and long-teen trends in decreasing abundance characterize all stations groups. While near- outfall areas are no longer significantly different from reference stations,there Is still a significant gradient In abundance with distance from the ougall that is not changing over time. Since the reference area shows a temporal trend,some regional influences are indicated. The decline and recovery of this Important Indicator species suggests that while the wastewater discharge is the most likely cause of enhanced abundance patterns near the ougall, other climatic factors can significantly affect these gradients. Recovery of this species to high abundance is expected, but the reason(s)for the lengthy recovery period is presently unknown. ParvNucine lenuisculpla. This clam historically has ranked as the third most abundant species within the general study area. Large population fluctuations with overall trends in decreasing abundance have been observed since 1985 (Appendix D.7). Reasons for these decreases are unknown, but may be related to reductions in wastewater nutrient concentrations over time. This species occurs in high abundance near some wastewater outtalls (Fabdkant 1984), and was more abundant along the 100-m (330-ft) depth contour than near the District's ougall in the early 1990's. Since July 1998, the spatial distribution of this species has been characterized by low abundance throughout the study area with little indication of an outiall gradient. While spatial patterns have essentially remained unchanged since July 1998, the patterns observed in the 1980's and early 1990's dominate the RMANOVA analysis and indicate significant patterns and gradients relative to the outfall (Appendix 117). RMANOVA analysis found significant differences among all station groups relative to the reference station. However, this gradient is now more of a historical remnant. Seasonal effects were significant and long-term trends of decreasing abundance were evident for all stations. Similar trends were evident at farfield stations, but these decreases are more indicative of area-wide changes suggesting regional effects. Thus, the trend for this species Indicates the combined effects of regional as well as outfall Influences. Cepilella "capitals". This polychaele womi is an opportunistic species (or species complex)that is considered an indicator of disturbed and organically enriched habitats (Tsutsumi 1990). Although specimens have been collected at most stations, the majority occur within the ZID and occasionally at Newport Canyon stations (Appendix D.7). This species had very high abundances near the ouffall in summer 2000, similar to the patterns observed for some previous years (e.g., 1985, 1988, 1989, and 1997), but was virtually absent in the summer of 1998. also similar to patterns observed for some previous years(e.g., 1987, 1992, and 1993). In almost all years (except for 1991 and possibly 1992 when Capitella had high abundance in Newport Canyon), peak abundance was centered near or at the outfall, thereby indicating an ouHell influence on the spatial pattem. Analysis of changes over time (RMANOVA) indicated that only the within-ZID station groups had significantly higher abundance than reference stations. Capitella abundance has been highly variable over the duration of the monitoring program, ranging from virtually absent during some surveys to high abundance for one to several quarterly surveys (OCSD 1996). These large changes in abundance, especially near the outfall, do not appear to be correlated with any measured environmental variables related to the wastewater discharge. RMANOVA indicated significant seasonal changes and a gradient with distance from the ouffall. Abundance decreased at a faster rate near the outfall with no significant changes for station groups away from the ouffall. Newport Canyon stations at times supported high abundances of this species that appeared to be related to storm disturbance and the high organic carbon content typical of canyon sediments. The presence of Capitella at locations away from the ouffall indicates that episodic recruitment of this species Is a natural phenomenon, not solely related to discharge effects. Its presence near the ouffall does not indicate a degraded environment, but most likely reflects the higher organic carbon content of the sediments and the dynamic nature of the sedimentary environment near the diffuser terminus. Amphiodia uRica. This briltlestar is one of the most abundant species in soft-bottom, continental shelf habitats of the Southern California Bight (Bergen at al. 1998). This species was displaced by ouffall construction in the early 1970's, followed initially by enhanced abundance, near the ouHell (OCSD 1996). However, after two years of wastewater discharges, Amphiodia began to disappear and within a few years was virtually absent over a large area. Repopulation of this species is a slow process bemuse recruitment of juveniles is most successful to areas where adults already occur (Smnland 1995). Consequently, repopulation is largely by immigration of adults,followed by juvenile recruitment Annual spatial abundance patterns for Amphiodia since 1985 (Appendix D.7) show an almost continuous repopulation over time to areas nearer the outtall. This repopulation coincided with reduced mass emissions of suspended solids, effective source control, and associated decreasing sediment contamination during the same period (Phillips and Hershelman 1996). Abundance increases have been most evident along the 100-m (330-11) depth contour and inshore of the ouffall. However, in 1999, Amphiodia abundances decreased at many stations, indicating a regional effect possibly associated with El Niho and to Nitta events. Thus, the recovery trend for this species was likely affected by these large-scale oceanographic events. Whether recent changes in Amphiodis abundance were direct effects of altered ocean temperatures or indirect effects of altered weather patterns is unknown. The depression of Amphiodia abundance near the ouffall also contributed to lower ITI values at these locations, as noted above. Analysis of changes over time (RMANOVA) indicated that Amphiodle abundance was significantly lower at the within and nearfield stations groups (Appendix D.7). Seasonal effects were not significant and temporal trends Indicated that station groups WD and NU were increasing at a significantly faster rate then el station groups WU and ND. Further, these increases were different from the decreasing trend observed for the reference station group. The slope of the gradient with distance from the ouffall has been decreasing through time, thereby supporting the recovery conclusion. The increase of Amphiodia to areas closer to the outfall Is expected to continue as indicated by the Vend lines. However,full recovery near the outfall pipe structure is unlikely due to the 'halo' effect from predation by reef dwellers (e.g., California scorpionfish) on this species. Thus, recovery from wastewater discharge effects is expected to reach equilibrium with'reef effects'(OCSD 1996). Infauns Community Summary and Conclusions Overall, results from 1998-01 for the infauna community indicate that the District's objectives, including permit compliance specifications were achieved as follow: • Infaunal community measures reflect the environmental complexity of the study area, combined with the influence of wastewater discharge and reef effects and recent El Nino and La Nina events. The community is diverse and generally abundant compared to the regional reference area. • Natural features of the study area account for most of the observed variability in species distribution and abundance. Depth-related factors are the most important determinant of community composition,followed by sediment grain size and canyon effects. • Infaunal abundance is the community measure that most dearly demonstrates an outfall effect. Infaunal abundance near the outfall was enhanced, but fell within the range considered representative of regional reference areas. Higher abundance near the ouffell did not result in a decrease In species richness (number of species)within and beyond the ZID. Thus, the infaunal community exhibited a response to the wastewater discharge that is reflected by gradients in abundance and diversity indices. However, beyond the ZID boundary,these changes did not result in a degraded community. • Abundances of the tolerant indicator species Euphdomedes carcharodonta recovered from El Nino effects and increased the proportion of crustaceans in the study area. The presence in 1999 and 2000 of the opportunistic worm Capitella 'capilata'at Stations 0 and ZB2 resulted in decreased community diversity and created a stronger gradient in these measures than seen in some previous years. However,the number of species tended to be highest near the outfall and inshore. Community measures(e.g., ITI)showed highly localized and only minor outfall effects and all values beyond the ZID were characteristic of normal communities. Amphiodia abundance has been recovering near the oufall since 1985 and also appears to be recovering from generalized decreases seen in 1998, most likely related to recent El Nino and La Nina events. • Temporal trends generally reflected increases in community diversity and a decreasing influence of the outfall. Decreases in the abundance of the indicator species Parvilucina tenuiscu/pta and the continued recovery of the sensitive indicator species Amphiodia urtice were correlated with Improving effluent and sediment quality and support the conclusion of decreasing ouffall effects. Long-temp trends in decreasing abundance for outfall depth stations at all locations suggest regional influences and/or large-scale climatic changes. • The limited spatial extent of outfall effects supports conclusions that a SIP Is being maintained beyond the ZID boundary and within the ZID there is a diverse and abundant infaunal community that is not degraded. These results also provide evidence that distinctive habitats of limited distribution have not been impacted adversely by the discharge. Demersal Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities Number of Species,Abundance,and Biomass Since 1985, semi-annual monitoring has sampled 189,626 fish representing 115 species and 172,690 EMI representing 148 texa. The high number of species is partly a reflection of the broad depth range sampled (36-137 m). As noted for the infaunal communities, depth effects strongly influence the composition and abundance of bottom fish and EMI (Allen at al. 1998). Numbers of species, abundance, and biomass Increase with water depth out to the outer continental shelf(Appendix D.9). At the two inshore shallow stations (36m) the most abundant species were the speckled sa cklab (Citharichthys sfigmaeus), yellowchin sculpin (Icelinus quadrisenafus), and longfin sanddabs (Cifharichfhys xanfhostigma). Along the 60-m depth contour at the farfield stations the most abundant species were yellowchin sculpin, Pacific sanddabs (Cifharichfhys sordidus), and longfin sanddabs, while near the outfall the most abundant were Iongfln sanddabs, Pack sanddabs, and yellowchin sculpin, in order of most to least abundant. Thus, for the most common species there is little difference in the distribution of the dominant species. At the deepest stations (137m) the most abundant species were Pacific sanddabs, Dover sole(Microsfomus paclgcus),and plalnfin midshipman(Podchthys notatus). The most frequently occurring fish species for the inshore stations included eight species that were found 67% of the time (Appendix D.9). These species were speckled sanddabs, longfin sanddabs, bigmouth sole (Hippoglossina slomafs), yellowchin sculpin, homyhead turbot (Pleuronichfhys verticalis), California tonguefish (Symphurus africaude), California lizardflsh (Synodus lucioceps), and fantail sole (Xystreurys liolepis). At the farfield 60-m stations, homyhead turbot were found 67% of the time, and longfin sanddabs, yellowchin sculpin, California tonguefish, roughback sculpin (Chilonotus pugefensis), and Pacific sanddabs were found 61% of the time. Near the outfall, the most frequently occurring species were longfin sanddabs, yellowchin sculpin, California tonguefish, and Pacific sanddabs, which occurred 83% of the time. At the deepest stations, gulf sanddabs (Cidrarichthys Iregilis), blackbelly eelpouts (Lycodes pacificus), Dover sole, stripetail rockfish (Sebastes saxicolo), Pacific sanddabs, and plainfin midshipman occurred 75%of the time. The distribution and abundance of EMI also largely coincided with water depth. However, unlike the infaunal community, larger, longer-lived animals dominate the epifaunal community, and epifauna community for the inshore area is depauperate compared to deeper waters on the continental shelf. For example,only 1.1%of the macroinvertebrales sampled between 10-200 m were found in the inshore area (10-25 m) based upon sampling of 114 stations for the 1994 SCBPP regional survey.This low number partly reflects the greater disturbance from waves and swell to surface-dwelling organisms at relatively shallow depths. Sand starfish, Astmpecten verrilli and A.braziliensis,are conspicuous in the inshore and middle shelf depths.Other common species that characterize the inshore depth zone include the black spotted shrimp (Crangon nigromaculats), tuberculate pear crab (Pyromaia tuberculate), elbow crab (Heterocrypfa occidentalts) and several species of hermit crabs. Dominant species found in the middle and outer shelf include the white sea urchin (Lytchinus picfus), ridgeback rock shrimp (Sicyonis ingenlis),and the fragile sea urchin(Allocentrolus b lifils). Appendix D.9 lists the most abundant and frequently occurring macroinvertebrates, respectively, from July 1998 to January 2001. Dominant Invertebrates fw the inshore area included the ridgeback rock shrimp, typically found in deeper water but juveniles were relatively abundant in 1999 and 2000. More typical species for the inshore area include the while sea urchin, California blade barnacle (Hamatoscalpellum caltfomium), slender sea pen (Stylefula elongate), California sand star (A. ver M), elbow crab, shortspined starfish (Pisaster brevispinus), and the black spotted shrimp. At outlall depths, common invertebrate species were similar for both the farfeld and near the outfall.These included the ddgeback rock shrimp,white sea urchin, and California blade barnacle (both more abundant near the outfall), yellow sea twig (Theses sp. B), California sea cucumber(Pamsfichopus califomicus), and brokenspine britlleslar(Ophium luefkenr), both of which were more abundant at farfield stations. At the deepest stations the fragile sea urchin was most abundant along with ridgeback rock shrimp and white sea urchin. Other common species at the deepest stations included the moustache bay shrimp (Neocrangon zacae), flagnose bay shrimp (Neocrangon resime), and the California sea slug (Pleumbranchaea caliPomics). These species are similar to those from other studies at these depths(Allen at al. 1998;Thompson at al. 1987). Variability between years can be significant and is usually due to high abundances of one or two species. For example, high fish abundance in 1985-88 was largely due to high numbers of yellowchin sculpin. Similarly, high abundance of macroinverebrates in 1993 resulted from large catches of white urchins and ridgeback rock shrimp. Fish abundance for the last three years appears to be increasing, while EMI abundance showed a slight decline. During August 1998, the mean number of species per bawl at outfall Station T1 exceeded all other 60-m stations except downcoast reference Station T3; however, these differences were not statistically significant (Appendix D.9). Fish abundance near the ouffall was intermediate and exceeded upcoast reference Station T11, but was lower than downcoast reference Staflon T3 where unusually large numbers of species and individuals occurred. During February 1999, outfall Station T1 had the highest average number of fish species and intermediate abundances compared to the other 55-m stations. These results indicated that the discharge was not significantly altering fish community measures. The number of macroinverebrale species sampled In August 1998 and January 1999 was intermediate between reference Stations T3 and T11 but abundaruxe was highest at Station T1. However, there were no statistically significant differences for community measures between Station T1 and other stations along the 55-m depth contcur (Table D.9-6). Thus, for 1998-99 there was no apparent impact from the outfall or discharge on the demersal fish and macroinvereluate community. Statistical testing for outfall effects by season from 1985-2001 (analysis conducted separately for summer and winter surveys)showed that ouffall Station T1 was not statistically different than reference Stations T3 and T11 for number of fish species and their abundance. Fish biomass tended to be highest at Station Tt compared to the other 55-m stations,and was significantly higher at the ouffall in summer than at upcoast Station T71 (Appendix D.9). These results suggest that fish near the outfall may be larger than at the other stations. Historically,the mean number of fish species per trawl generally increased with depth(OCSD 1999);however,this trend has not been evident In recent years. For 200"1,the mean number of species collected at 55-m stations was 15.1.while 36-m and 137-m stations averaged 13.1 and 14.3 species, respectively. Thus,there was no evidence for changes in the fish community near the outfall, with the exception of somewhat greater biomass. Statistical testing for outfall effects by season from 1985-2001 (analysis conducted separately for summer and winter surveys) showed some differences for outfall Station T1 (Appendix D.9). There was no significant difference in the number of species between outfall and reference stations for winter surveys, but for summer surveys upooasl reference Station T11 had significantly more species than Station T1. However, there was no statistically significant difference for the number of macroinverebrale species between Station T1 and downcoast reference Station T3. For abundance, there was no significant difference between outfall and reference stations in winter,but in summer downcoast reference Station T3 had significantly more invertebrates than both upcoast reference Station T11 and outfall Station Tt. Biomass values showed a similar trend with Station T3 having greater biomass than Stations T11 and T3 for both winter and summer. In summary, OMP results demonstrate that the demersal fish and EMI community has not been altered by the discharge. Seasonal changes were evident,but they were not consistent from year to year. Within any one year there is no indication of significant differences for community measures between outfall and reference areas. Longer term seasonal analyses showed some significant differences for some community measures; however, there was as much variability between the two reference areas as for the outfall station compared to the reference stations. Thus, as noted for most previous years of the OMP there were no consistent differences for demersal community measures for the station nearest the ouffall compared to other stations along the 55-m depth contour,thereby Indicating little or no effect from the outfall and wastewater discharge. These results support the conclusion that a BIP exists beyond the ZID and that the area nearest the discharge Is not a degraded habitat. Diversity Indices Fish diversity Indices (IT, SR, and Dominance; see description for infauna)for fish communities showed no consistent pattern with depth, station location, or season for the 1998-99, 1999-00, and 2000-01 surveys (Appendix D.9). Statistical testing of outfall effects on fish diversity measures by season from 1985-2001 (analysis conducted separately for summer and winter surveys) showed some differences for outfall Station T1 (Appendix D.9). For summer surveys, diversity Indices (IT and SR)generally were higher at the outfall Station T1 than for the other 55- m stations, but these differences were not significant. However, for winter surveys Station T1 always had the highest diversity, and these values often were significantly greater than reference stations. Thus, based on fish diversity, the outfall supported significantly higher or comparable diversity compared to reference areas. Higher diversity is generally believed to be a positive attribute of communities. Thus, the outfall area is not degraded and any detectable differences between the ouffell and reference suggest positive effects, possibly related to increased food supply(e.g..more IMauna prey;see Appendix D.7). As noted for fish, EMI diversity Indices showed no consistent pattern with depth,station location, or season for the 1998-99, 1999-00,and 2000-01 surveys(Appendix D.9). Statistical testing for outfall effects on EMI diversity measures from 1985.2001 (analysis conducted separately for summer and winter surveys)showed some differences for Station Tt (Appendix D.9). For summer surveys,outfall Station Tt had intermediate diversity for the 55-m stations and for three of the diversity indices upcoast reference Station T11 had significantly higher diversity,than either Station T1 or downcoast reference Station T3. There was no significant difference between Stations Tt and T3. For J',upcoast reference Station T11 had significantly higher diversity than downcoast reference Station T3,but Station T1 was not different from either reference station. For winter surveys,outtall Station T1 generally had intermediate diversity values and there were no significant differences from reference stations. Thus,based on longer term seasonal analyses there was little indication of outfall effects on EMI diversity values.This supports the conclusion that the outfall area Is not degraded and that a BIP persists beyond the ZID. Community measures from the July 2000 trawl survey were compared to results from summer trawl surveys conducted at regional reference areas(Thompson at al. 1987; SCCWRP 1992)and regional surveys (i.e., 1994 Southern California Bight Pilot Project [SCBPP] and 1998 Southern California Bight Regional Survey [Bight'98]). SCBPP sampled 114 stations throughout the SCB and found no degraded areas, but noted enhancement of some community measures at some locations near wastewater outfalls. For example, average fish abundance and biomass were higher near curtails. The District's July 2000 average of 15.7 fish species for outfall Station Tt was higher than the regional average and well within the range of values found for reference areas (Allen at al. 1998). The average number of fish species per trawl In central Bight areas near large publicly owned treatment works (POTWs)was 13.8 (range of 7-23)in 1994 and 11.0 (range of 5.26) in 1998. For small POTW areas In the same region and depth, the average number of fish species was 12.5(range of 7-19) and 10.0 (range of 5-17)for the 1994 and 1998 regional surveys, respectively. Fish abundance for Station T1 was within the range of values for large POTW areas within the SCB, but greater than the range for small POTW areas. Fish biomass and diversity (IT) at Station T1 was within the range of regional survey values. Fish community measures at the outfall station equaled or exceeded values characterizing small POTW areas within the central Bight at similar depths. This supports the conclusion that the fish community near the discharge Is not degraded and is representative of a BIP. For EMI community measures, Station T7 tended to have higher or comparable mean number of species and diversity in 2000 than the 1985 and 1990 regional reference areas (Appendix 119). Mean abundance and biomass at Station Tl was much lower than the regional reference areas. However, lower values for these community measures compared to regional averages were also typical for the District's two reference stations. Thus, EMI community measures appear to be representative of regional patterns and not localized conditions centered at the outfall. For number of species, abundance, and biomass, the mean values for the ouffall and reference stations fell within the range of values reported for the regional reference areas. For H', the District's 2000 mean values for the outfall and both reference stations were lower than the range of the 1990 reference values. Outfall Station T1 and reference Station T11 were within the range of reference values for 1985,while H'at reference Station T3 exceeded the 1985 range. Indicator Species To further assess the influence of the wastewater discharge on the demersal fish community, abundance of the five most common fish and the five most common macroinvenebrate species during June 2000 and January 2001 was compared among the 55-m stations. The five fish species examined were yellowchin sculpin, Pacific sanddab, longfin sanddab, California tonguefish,and longspine combfish. The five most common macroinvenebrate species at the 55- m stations were the yellow sea twig, brokenspine brittlestar,trailtip sea pen,California sand star, and California blade barnacle(Appendix D.9). Significant differences among stations were detected for all target fish (Appendix D.9). Califomia tonguefish and yellowchin sculpin showed spatial gradients in abundance. California tonguefish were more abundant at the ouffall and intermediate upwast stations (T12 and T13)than at the reference stations(T3 and T11),and mean abundance was significantly greater at the outfall than at reference Stations T3 and T11. Conversely, yellowchin sculpin showed an increase in abundance with distance from the outfall, with mean abundance significantly greater at Station T11 than at T1. Further, there was no difference between Station T1 and downwast reference Station T3 for this species. No statistical differences were detected for ouffall and reference stations for Pacific sanddab. For longfin sanddab, Station T1 had significantly more individuals than reference Station T11. Longspine combfish were significantly more abundant at downwast reference Station T3 then at Station T1, although no difference was detected between Tt and upcoast reference Station T11. For these target fish, Station T1 had either the highest or lowest mean abundance for each species. Feeding preferences and the potential for predation by large fish aggregating at the outfall are likely reasons for the observed abundance patterns (Diener at al. 1997). There were no significant differences between Station T1 and the two reference stations(T3 and T11)for any of the selected EMI species. The yellow sea twig had the highest mean abundance at Stations T1 and T3, and there were no significant differences In abundance for this species between the outfall and reference stations. Brokenspine brittlestar abundance was not significantly different between the ouffall and reference stations. Abundance for the trailtip sea pen for the out all and reference stations were not different Abundances of the California sand star and California blade barnacle were similar across all 55-m stations. Fish and EMI Communities Summary and Conclusions Results of the 1998-99, 1999-00, and 2000.01 surveys of demersal fish and EMI communities found few differences compared to local and regional reference stations. Differences detected in the demersal fish community indicated varying degrees of enhancement of the community near the outfall. While there were no statistically significant differences for macroinvertebrales between the outall and local reference stations, the number of species and abundance of macroinvertebretes within the study area was lower than for regional sites. However, all community measures in the vicinity of the outfall were within the range of local and regional values. Trends over time appear to be regional in nature, potentially related to commercial harvesting and/or long-term changes in ocean temperatures, and unrelated to the Distric's wastewater discharge. - Overall, results indicate that the District's objectives, including permit compliance specifications, were achieved as follow: • Fish community measures for outfall Station T1 were either similar to or greater than those for local and regional reference stations and other large POTW areas. The number of fish species,number of individuals,and fish biomass at the outall were comparable to other 55-m stations in the study area, while diversity was significantly greater at the ouffell than at reference stations for three of four diversity measures. High diversity at the outfall indicates that the area is not degraded and a SIP is being maintained beyond the ZID. • Few significant differences were observed among the 55-m stations for selected fish target species. Station Tl had values comparable to at least one of the local reference stations. Thus, as noted for community measures, there was no indication that the wastewater discharge mused significant adverse effects on the blots near the outfall. These results support the conclusion that the outfall area is not degraded by the wastewater discharge and a SIP exists. • EMI community measures were relatively low within the study area, but mean values for outfall and reference stations typically were within the range of values reported for regional reference areas. Further the number of species and diversity values at the District's stations were comparable to regional values. Results for Station T7 generally did not differ significantly from local reference stations, but did vary from year to year. Abundance and biomass values at Station T1 were lower in 2000-01 compared to the two previous years. These lower values occurred when fish abundance was at almost record highs, suggesting a possible influence from fish predation. Lower values for most community measures were also typical of the two reference stations (T3 and T11) compared to regional values. Thus, lower EMI measures appear to be representative of the study area and not a localized phenomenon centered at the outfall. • Trends in community measures over the past 16 years are potentially influenced by large- scale and long-tens climatic patterns, watershed changes, and commercial harvesting activities. OMP results demonstrate that a SIP is being maintained beyond the ZID boundary and there Is a diverse and abundant community and within the ZID. These results also provide evidence that distinctive habitats of limited distribution have not been impacted adversely by the discharge; commercial or recreational fisheries have not been Impacted severely by the current discharge; the discharge does not cause mass mortality;and the discharge does not interfere with migratory pathways within the ZID. 125.124(Q—Evaluation of available alternatives to the discharge of the pollutants including an evaluation of the possibility of land-based disposal or disposal in an approved ocean dumping site. The requirements of Section 403 of the Clean Water Act are intended to ensure that no unreasonable degradation of the marine environment occurs as the result of the discharge and that sensitive ecological communities are protected(EPA undated). This section is provided for a discharger to examine alternatives that might provide for no discharge. Since the existing outfall and treatment facilities were in existence prior to the enactment of the Clean Water Act in 1972, they are not applicable. However,the District has an active program to maximize reuse of treated wastewater through the Groundwater Replenishment System program undertaken jointly with the Orange County Water District This program will assist in reducing the overall volume of discharge that would otherwise enter marine waters. VOLUME 1-4 ANTIDEGRADATION ANALYSIS DRAFT ANTI DEGRADATION ANALYSIS To Support NPDES Permit Application CA 0110604 Orange County Sanitation District CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND FINDINGS........................................................................ I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... II. PROPOSED CHANGES IN EFFLUENT FLOW AND QUALITY AND IMPACTS ON WATER QUALITY............................................................................ A. Present and Projected Service Area Wastewater Flows..................................... B. Wastewater Recycling (Reclamation) Potential .................................................. C. Beneficial Uses of the Marine Environment and Water Quality Protection ......... D. Effluent Disposal ................................................................................................ 1. Initial Dilution and Compliance with Water Quality Standards.................... 2. Effluent Quality........................................................................................... 3. Marine Environmental Conditions............................................................... E. Anlidegradation Analysis......................................................................._............ 1. Technical Analysis of Effects on Marine Water Quality.............................. a. Ambient Dissolved Oxygen Suppression Analysis ............................. b. Effects of Suspended Solids on Water Quality................................... c. Effects on Ambient pH........................................................................ d. Compliance with Bacteriological Limitations....................................... e. Toxic Pollutant Considerations........................................................... III. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS....................................................... A. Social Impacts..................................................................................................... B. Economic Benefits.............................................................................................. IV. CONTROL OF POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES................................................. V. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION........... VI. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... TABLE Table 1 Beneficial Uses..................................................................................... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND FINDINGS The Orange County Sanitation District (District or OCSD) has requested a new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, which will involve a dramatic change in permit limits overtime. This involves voluntarily giving up a 301(h}modified NPDES permit (secondary treatment waiver). This permit was first applied for in 1979 and issued in 1985 for a five-year term, after years of technical review and resolution of issues related to potential marine impacts. A renewal application was submitted in 1989 and a second renewal was issued for a five year period in 1998. Before a third renewal application was filed, the District undertook(as in the past) a review of the available treatment options and fostered public debate. On the basis of public input and deliberation of the trade-offs, the District's Board of Directors voted in July 2002 to move toward full secondary treatment [30 mgA standards for total suspended solids (TSS) and five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5 or simply SOD)]. Prior to this vote to change the level of treatment, the District had discharged an effluent consisting of a 50:50 blend of advanced primary and secondary effluent in compliance with provisions of the California COP and Its 1998 NPDES Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR's). In 1999, the District adopted an new Strategic Plan that reviewed various treatment options including NPDES permit limits, 50:50 blend, and secondary treatment, including participation in a regional reclamation project(as a co-participant). At that time, the Board chose to pursue Permit Limits with participation in the Groundwater Replenishment System project(GWRS)with the Orange County Water District (OCWD). Through this participation, the District would provide up to 104 MGD a day of secondary effluent to support the project with a $125 million dollar investment in Phase 1 of the project. In return, the District would be able to achieve hydraulic relief during peak wet weather, which would allow deferral of construction of a new ocean outfall costing in excess of$150 million. This proposed permit application requests a modification to move toward 30/30 standards over time. Since additional secondary treatment facilities must be constructed, there will be a need for some interim effluent standards until the 30/30 limits can be met. The District staff has prepared an Operational Plan covering the next permit period,which suggests interim limits for BOD and TSS that are lower than those of the current permit and achievable during the next five years (See Appendix O). Effluent quality is expected to remain the same or improve in the future, particularly during wet weather periods when the GWRS comes on line in 2007. Operating under the requested permit limits will result in a net reduction in mass emissions of wastewater constituents as treatment is improved. The present effluent and receiving water limitations [derived from the requirements of the California Ocean Plan (COP)after accounting for initial dilution and receiving water background conditions] do not need to be changed, with the exception of lowering TSS and BOD levels, as a result of the requested permit modification. In addition to the COP requirements, the District will have to meet the secondary treatment requirements of the federal Clean Water Act(CWA)in the future, when new facilities costing hundreds of millions of dollars are planned, designed, and constructed. These new facilities are not expected to be online for close to 10 years. The present limits in the NPDES Permit/WDR's were developed with the purpose of protecting beneficial uses on a statewide basis and modified to meet local needs by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB or Regional Board). These limits continue to be sufficient to protect local beneficial uses. Since flows are expected to decrease in the future as a result of the diversion of secondary effluent to advanced treatment and reuse, there will be only a gradual increase In flow through the planning period (Year 2020)and until full secondary treatment is implemented (Year 2013). It is not anticipated that mass limits will increase in the future. Effluent quality is expected to improve, thus any water quality changes in the marine environment are expected to be minor. Since most potential impacts, particularly with highly treated secondary effluents, are concentration-based rather than mass based, no degradation in water quality is anticipated. This antidegradation analysis presents evidence that the proposed changes in effluent flow and quality will not degrade existing water quality or existing beneficial uses of the Pacific Ocean near the OCSD outfall. I. INTRODUCTION Federal regulations require states to develop and adopt antidegradation policies, as part of state water quality standards,to protect and maintain existing used of water bodies and high quality waters [See 40 C.F.R.131.12.]. California's antidegradation policy is contained in the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) Resolution No. 68- 16, entitled "Statement of Policy with Respect to Maintaining High Quality Waters in California." In general, Resolution 68-16 requires that existing levels of water quality be maintained until it has been demonstrated "that any change will be consistent with the maximum benefit to the people of the State,will not unreasonably affect present and anticipated beneficial uses of such water and will not result in water quality less than prescribed in [applicable water quality control] policies." The State Board has Issued administrative guidance for implementing both Resolution No. 68-16 and federal antidegradation regulations. This antidegradation analysis has been conducted in accordance with the State Board and evaluates the potential changes in marine water quality associated with the requested modification of the NPDES Permit and WDR's Issued to OCSD under the provisions of the federal CWA and in compliance with the COP. The modified permit would decrease the allowable mass emissions of secondary treatment constituents, including BOO and TSS,to reflect the move towards secondary treatment standards. It is not anticipated that there would be any change in other numerical effluent limitations applicable to the discharge. The District anticipates that new permit requirements will be adopted In the renewal of WDR's issued by the Regional Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB), in coordination with the US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). These requirements will embody the effluent limits and receiving water standards of the COP, in addition to more stringent limits (secondary treatment)for TSS and BOD's. The numeric limits of the WDR's will be aimed at preserving marine water quality and protecting beneficial uses. The current program of treatment plant Improvements (Capital Improvement Program) and expansion through the year 2020 is projected to cost$1.6 billion, of which some $420 million is related to the upgrading to achieve 30/30 limits. Water reuse for the secondary effluent produced by the District's treatment plants is an important local planning consideration. Local water recycling studies initiated in 1994 have resulted in a cooperative program with OCWD to construct and operate a multipurpose regional reuse project, GWRS. The first phase of this project will result in the production In excess of 60,000 acre-feet a year of water for seawater intrusion protection, groundwater enhancement and direct reuse. The costs of Phase I are now estimated at about$380 million. Costs are being shared by both agencies, along with assistance of state and federal grants and loans. Estimated costs for the District in Phase 1 are now$138 million. A major Incentive for such an Investment Is the ability of the project to handle up to 100 MGD of flaw during wet weather flow peaks. This hydraulic relief would allow the District to defer construction of a new ocean ouffall to handle peak flows. More information on this project can be found in Appendix N of this application. II. PROPOSED CHANGES IN EFFLUENT FLOW AND QUALITY AND IMPACTS ON WATER QUALITY The District's effluent discharge under the proposed Operational Plan (Appendix Q) would result in a gradual Increase in treated influent flow from current levels. Once the GWRS project is operational (anticipated in late 2007), effluent flows to the ocean would be reduced substantially to around 200 MGD. Mass emissions would actually decrease as Influent flows Increase, but the quality of the effluent Itself is expected to Improve as a result of enhanced treatment. Toxic pollutant effluent concentrations are not expected to change from their very low to non-detectable levels, which result from the highly effective source control program (See Appendix N). Effluent quality requirements for the proposed permit will be based on the federal CWA technology-based standards of secondary treatment that requires a 30-day average concentration of TSS and BOD not to exceed 30 mg/l, with a daily average not to exceed 60 mg/l. In addition, the current permit embodies the requirements of the California COP Table A for conventional parameters and Table B for toxic limitations. The present receiving water bacteriological limits and water quality standards will apply to this permit modification. A summary of anticipated effluent quality is discussed in Appendix D.3 along with a comparison of existing treatment plant performance. There will be a gradual increase in flow over a 20 year period and an Improvement in effluent quality resulting in a net reduction in mass emissions. As a result, water quality changes in the marine environment are projected to be reduced. Quantification of any such changes will be handled by the District's Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP) in continuation of the present program, and as modified by regulatory agencies in the new permit. Since most potential impacts, particularly with highly treated secondary effluents, are concentration-based rather than mass based, no degradation in water quality is anticipated if effluent quality does not drop below present quality. A local oceanographic(bacteriological study was commissioned by the District to determine the impact of the OCSD discharge on near-shore water quality. This study (not yet released in final form) Indicated nonpoint sources appear to be the predominant source of high bacterial counts, particularly during wet weather. A. Present and Projected Wastewater Flows and Effluent Quality During the last full fiscal year of record (July 2001- June 2002),the OCSD ocean outfall final effluent flow averaged 234 MGD. Maximum hourly peak wet weather flow had the potential to be in excess of 480 MGD (capacity of the existing outfall). Such high flows are being addressed in the plant expansion through a new effluent pump station, use of the 78-inch reserve ouffall during peak flow events, and participation in the GWRS project, which can handle up to 100 MGD of peak flow for treatment and discharge to the Santa Ana River as advanced treated effluent. In addition, infiltration/inflow reduction efforts are underway by the District and local cities (See Appendix R). More details on projected flows are presented in Appendix C. Projected effluent flows and quality for the next five years is presented in Appendix D.3 for key parameters. B. Wastewater Recycling (Reclamation) The California Water Code (Section 13510)declares"that the people of the state have a primary interest in the development of facilities to recycle water containing waste to supplement existing surface and underground water supplies and to assist in meeting the future water requirements of the stale.' To achieve this end, OCSD has been working with OCWD to expand recycling opportunities. A report prepared in 1994 recommended implementation of the GWRS project, which is now in the process of final design (See Appendix N). C. Beneficial Uses of the Marine Environment and Water Quality Protection Waters of the Pack Ocean near the OCSD outfall are designated for a number of beneficial uses. The COP and the Santa Ana River Basin Plan identify the following beneficial uses of state ocean waters to be protected: Industrial Service Supply Navigation Water Contact Recreation Non-contact Water Recreation Ocean Commercial and Sport Fishing Wildlife Habitat Preservation of Rare and Endangered Species Fish Migration Fish Spawning Shellfish Harvesting Marine Habitat Locally, beneficial uses are predominantly summer recreational uses of the beaches, such as swimming, surfing, windsurfing,and fishing. Newport Bay,to the south of the discharge area, is a major mooring facility for commercial and private vessels. Commercial fishing activities are extensive and worth millions of dollars a year. Sport fishing from party boats, private boats and piers is popular. Besides recreation, other local beneficial uses include marine habitat, fish migration, and spawning and shellfish harvesting. Local marine mammals include harbor seals, white-sides dolphins and California sea lions. Annually, Grey whales migrate past the area. A summary of key beneficial uses is shown in Table 1. This summary is derived from information detailed in the Beneficial Use Assessment supporting this applicafion (Appendix E). In order to protect these beneficial uses,the COP establishes water quality objectives (for bacteriological, physical, chemical, and biological characteristics, and for radioactivity), general requirements for management of waste discharge to the ocean, quality requirements for waste discharges, discharge prohibitions, and general provisions. Receiving water monitoring is conducted in accordance with perk requirements to demonstrate compliance with the appropriate objectives. The past three years of monitoring by OCSD under a new Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP) has shown that COP limits are being met based on the results from monitoring bacterial indicators,visual observations, measurements of receiving water pH, secchi depth (a measure of water clarity), temperature, and dissolved oxygen. D. Effluent Disposal OCSD's treated wastewater effluent is discharged into the Pacific Ocean some 4 miles offshore west of Huntington Beach through a 120-inch diameter concrete outfall and 108-inch diameter 5280 foot long multi-port(503 ports)terminal diffuser at a depth of 180 feet (60 meters)below mean low water. 1. Initial Dilution and Compliance with Water Quality Standards Initial dilution is the process that results in the rapid and irreversible turbulent mixing of effluent with ocean water around the point of discharge.The initial momentum of the discharge (as measured by port velocity), combined with Its initial buoyancy (freshwater rises), act together to produce turbulent mixing. Initial dilution between the effluent and seawater is generally completed when the diluted effluent ceases to rise any further in the water column and first begins to spread horizontally(plume entrainment period generally occurs within minutes). Well-designed and property located marine ouffalls typically achieve initial dilution values of about 100: 1 or better before the plume begins a transition from essentially vertical flow to an essentially horizontal flow dominated by ambient oceanographic conditions. The OCSD outfall had been estimated to have a conservative (worst case) initial dilution of under current conditions with average dilution in the range of 200- 300:1 (See Appendix M). This is the initial dilution most recently calculated for the end of the next five year permit period. The present permit has a dilution of 180:1 credit used to determine COP effluent limitations. Effluent limitations for 71 different toxic materials (excluding radioactivity)are established for OCSD's WDR to assure compliance with COP receiving water standards. These limits are calculated to ensure that the concentration after initial dilution is less than the receiving water standard (accounting for natural background levels). The RWQCB has used a minimum initial dilution of 180:1 for specifying OCSD's present effluent limitations. For the present analysis, a conservative estimate of initial dilution of _was used. The higher the initial dilutions, the lower the concentrations of effluent constituents present in the receiving waters, thus ensuring better water quality. 2. Effluent Quality Effluent quality parameters are reported monthly to the RWQCB and the EPA. Analyses of effluent quality for the full scan of over 126 priority pollutants is performed routinely. Results have consistently demonstrated that there are few detectable toxics present in the OCSD effluent. Those priority pollutants that are detectable above the analytical detection limits are generally a few of the trace metals and common organic constituents. All are well within permit limits and benchmark thresholds. A summary of the last fiscal year results are presented in Appendix G. 3. Marine Environmental Conditions Monitoring of marine water quality is done on a frequent basis by OCSD. Results indicate that the discharge has not had any significant measurable influence on ambient water quality. A summary of the receiving water monitoring results and biological and sediment quality results are detailed in Appendix D. E. Antidegradation Analysis As noted above, federal regulations require States to develop antidegradation policies, as part of State water quality standards. The antidegradation policy of California is contained in State Board Resolution No. 68-16, entitled "Statement of Policy with Respect to Maintaining High Quality Waters in California." Consistent with federal regulations, Resolution No. 68-16 essentially requires that existing levels of water quality be maintained, and not degraded as a result of waste discharge. Essentially, degradation in water quality may not occur until it has been demonstrated that any such reduction "will be consistent with the maximum benefit to the people of the State." Under federal regulations, no activity is allowable that would partially or completely eliminate any existing beneficial use. Beneficial uses in the vicinity of the OCSD outall have been Identified earlier. This section analyzes the impact of the proposed permit changes to decrease the allowable mass emissions of the discharge through the ouffall. 1. Technical Analysis of Effects on Marine Water Quality. The following sections contain an analysis of the effects that the proposed end-of-permit effluent discharge will have on marine water quality. The analysis is intended to compare the receiving water impacts of the current discharge with the potential impacts of the interim discharge. Supporting calculations are detailed in Appendix M. This analysis demonstrates that the requested effluent limits would have little or no impact on marine water quality (slight improvements are anticipated). a. Ambient Dissolved Oxygen Suppression Analysis Dissolved oxygen (DO)suppression can result from the discharge of oxygen demanding substances [as measured by the 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) test] through the outall. Simple calculations indicate that the DO suppression under an anticipated "worst case" effluent dissolved oxygen level of 3 mg1I is estimated to be less than 2 percent, which is 5 times less than allowable under the COP. Quarterly receiving water monitoring shows that the average DO suppression is now about 4.6 percent when comparing the ouffall station to the reference stations, indicating COP compliance. The data consistently shows relatively high DO values. The requested interim discharge requirements will have no impact on OCSD's ability to maintain compliance with the receiving water limits for dissolved oxygen. b. Effects of Suspended Solids on Water Quality The increase in receiving water suspended solids concentration immediately following initial dilution is estimated to be<OA mg/I (assuming a total suspended solids concentration of 40 mg/1). The COP does not contain a suspended solids limitation, but contains the surrogate parameter of light transmittance. Light transmittance can be measured in several ways. In the OCSD permit, light transmittance is used as a measure of water clarity. Under average conditions, OCSD's effluent is expected to result in less than a 1% decrease in ambient turbidity compared to the COP Standard of no greater than a 10% decrease in light transmittance(See Appendix D for details). The requested Interim effluent limits will have no Impact on OCSD's ability to maintain compliance with the receiving water limits for light transmittance. c. Effects on Ambient DH There has been no detectable change in receiving water pH as a result of OCSD's effluent discharge. The effluent discharge is expected to range in pH from 6.0 to 8.5, with an average of 6.8 based on current effluent quality measurements (See Appendix D for details on compliance). The requested interim effluent limits will have no Impact on OCSD's ability to maintain compliance with the effluent receiving water limits for pH. d. Compliance with Bacteriological Limitations In August 2002, the District initiated effluent disinfection using bleach with the goal of meeting applicable receiving water standards after the completion of initial dilution. The modified treatment facilities will have a greater capacity to handle peak flows and will have better performance during wet weather when it comes to effluent disinfection. It is anticipated that better disinfection will be achieved, thus overall bacterial levels will be maintained. Bacterial levels will be met through chlorination and subsequent dechlorination to meet a goal of<10.000 MPN/100 ml of coliform indicator bacteria at the end of initial dilution. The requested interim effluent limits will improve the District's ability to maintain compliance with receiving water limits for indicator bacteria since lower solids will make disinfection more effective. Disinfection facilities are upgraded to more permanent short-term facilities in the near future and long-term disinfection alternatives to bleach are being studied. e. Toxic Pollutant Considerations No changes in the existing permit limitations are proposed for toxic pollutants presently regulated under the California COP. Presently, toxic pollutant levels are low and in compliance with COP standards (See Appendix Q. Effluent quality will be the same or better in the future and compliance should be maintained with a wide margin of safety. Testing shows that toxicity is highly variable and increasing as a result of increasing ammonia levels experienced during the current drought. Consequently, this increase has reduced effluent flows and increased ammonia concentrations in the influent. Improved treatment plans will reduce effluent toxicity in the future (See Appendices C, I, and J). The requested interim effluent limits will not change OCSD's ability to maintain compliance with the effluent limits for whole effluent toxicity. III. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS Federal antidegradation regulations specify that it must be shown that "allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located." Similarly, State Board Resolution No. 68- 16 [antidegradation policy] authorizes a limited reduction in existing water quality, provided that such a change is consistent with maximum public benefit. As demonstrated above, the proposed interim effluent limits, reduction in flow and mass emissions of conventional pollutants, and transition to higher amounts of secondary treated effluent to the marine environment will not degrade receiving water quality conditions. However,the proposed interim limits are needed to avoid the potential for fines for noncompliance during the transition to 30/30 standards. A. Social Impacts OCSD service area development is dependent, in part, upon responsible decision- making on the part of local, regional, state, and federal government entities. Critical to such decision-making is the governmental consideration of the best interest of the public, including providing for a cleaner, safer environment and protection of public health. The decision to upgrade the treatment plants was made through a process in which public input was obtained and decisions were made by elected officials. These decisions included preparation of planning documents and environmental documentation under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. Open public meetings were held to discuss the findings of such reports and to certify and adopt policies. Any decisions to change the WDR's as requested will be made by the RWQCB after conducting a noticed public hearing. Based on this antidegradation analysis, there is no reason in which to oppose the proposed request for interim limits. B. Economic Benefits Several areas of economic benefit can be derived from issuance of the new NPDES permit and WDR's. The treatment plant expansion and upgrading to meet 30/30 limits will allow planned growth to proceed and maximize the use of existing facilities with improved treatment. User fees have increased to pay for the recent treatment plant expansion and associated operating costs. Full utilization of the plant will allow for new connections that will generate additional revenues needed to offset the costs of providing service. IV. CONTROL OF POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES The State Board's antidegradation policy specifies that the"highest statutory and regulatory requirements for all new and existing point sources and all cost effective and reasonable best management practices for nonpoint source control" shall be achieved. The proposed interim limits will not cause any direct increase in nonpoint source emissions. In fact, OCSD has taken a lead role in the control of some nonpoint source emissions to the watershed and marine waters through its Environmental Stewardship program (Appendix R). Recent studies have shown that there are many potential sources that contribute to the high bacterial levels observed in local shoreline waters. The comprehensive oceanographic and bacterial assessment authorized by OCSD will be issuing a final report in the fall of 2002 that will identify the influence on marine water quality of various point and nonpoint sources. The OCSD treatment plants will continue to be controlled to the highest regulatory requirements under the existing permit and regulatory conditions. V. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Federal antidegradation policy requires that"full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the State's continuing planning process" be insured in reaching a decision regarding lowering of water quality. The present treatment plant upgrading has been in the planning stages on an on-going basis since the CWA was adopted. The District has always maintained a plan to proceed to full secondary treatment. Based on scientific evidence, its Board of Directors elected to seek a waiver from the requirements, as allowed under Section 301(h)of the CWA. Recently, in response to public input and evaluation of the costs and trade-offs, the Board elected to move to 30/30 standards. All other programs for expanding the plants and maintaining the Environmental Stewardship programs will remain unchanged. Public participation in the on-going planning process to refine present plans and expansions as needed will continue unchanged. This Includes meeting flow needs in response to the adoption of local general plans designating the needed flows to accommodate approved land use changes, preparation of needed documentation in compliance with CEQA, approvals from various government organizations for permits and continuing local involvement through OCSD Board meetings. The Regional Board and the EPA will consider the proposed permit changes as part of a public review process for the issuance of WDR's. Intergovernmental coordination will be accomplished through the permitting process. VI. REFERENCES California State Water Resources Control Board, 1997. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters. (California COP). CDM, 1999 Strategic Plan. Environmental Science Associates, 1999. Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Orange County Sanitation District Strategic Plan. Table 1. Beneficial Uses Identified in Orange County Sanitation District NPDES Penult And Basin Plan for Santa Ana River and Orange County Coastal Region Beneficial Use' Local Uses' Water Quality or Environmental Parameters of Importance to Use Water Contact Recreation(REC-1) Some 20 million people a year use Bacterial indicators Includes all recreational uses involving body local beaches In Huntington Beach Water clarity contact with water, such as swimming, wading, and Newport Beach with an Floatables water skiing,skin diving,windselling,suKng,sport estimated 2.5 million going surfing Oil and grease fishing,or other uses where ingestion of the"ter and 2A million going swimming. Is reasonably possible. Other nearehom activities such as paddle-boarding,kayaking,surf kiting,and windsurfing may take place in offshore waters,but participation Is on the order of less than 20,000 participants a year. SCUBA diving is somewhat limited by is estimated to be 1000 participants. Non-Contact Water Recreation(REC-2) Some 20 ndilian people a year use Bacterial indicators Recreational uses which involve the presence of local beaches in Huntington Beach Floatables water, but not necessarily require body contact, and Newport Beach. Newport Oil and grease such as picnicking,sunbathing,hiking, Beach is a major harbor and there beachcombing,camping,pleasure boating, Is significant use of the offshore lidepool and marine 18e study,hunting,and waters by pleasure boaters. general aesthetic enjoyment Ocean Commercial and Nonfreshwater Sport Commercial fishing generates an Toxics Including Fishing(COMM) estimated catch valued at$30 metals,pesticides Includes the commercial collection of fish and million a year(Myr)mainly derived and other priority shellfish,including those collected for bell,plus from Pacific sardines($26 M/yr), pollutants sport fishing in the ocean,bays,estuaries,and Mackerel($3 Mlyr)and anchovy Bacterial Indicators similar nonfreshwater areas. collecting($0.5 Mtyr). Recreational fishing is valued at $10 M/yr.The economic benefit to the community Is estimated to be 2-3 Imes the actual value of the catch placing it at$80-100 M/yr. Wildlife Habitat(WILD) Diverse and abundant wildlife with Tootles including, Provides a water or food supply(and supports a many species of marine birds,and metals,pesticides vegetative habitat)for the maintenance of mammals. and other priority wildlife. pollutants Bacterial Indicators Preservation of Rare and Endangered Twenty-seven species of Toxics Including Species(RARE) endangered/prolected animals may metals,pesticides Provides an aquatic habitat that Is necessary,at occur in the vicinity of the Orange and other priority least in part,for the survival of identified rare and County Ougell. There are 8 pollutants endangered species. mammals,5 sea turtles,8 birds(3 Bacterial Indicators off shore species),4 fish species and two invertebrates(white and black abalone). Marine Habitat(MAR) Many species of fish,shelmsh, Toxics Including Provides for the preservation of the marine marine mammals,birds and metals,pesticides ecosystem,Including the propagation and vegetation Including coastal and other priority sustenance offish,shellfish,marine mammals wetlands and boys and estuaries ' pollutants watedawl,and marine vegetation. along the Orange County coast. Bacterial Indicators Shellfish Harvesting(SHELL) Commercial lobster valued at Toxics including The collection of shellfish such as dams, $91,000/yr and rock crab catch In metals,pesticides abalone,shrimp,crab,and lobster for sport or waters out to depths of 400 8 at and other priority commercial purposes. $8,4001yr. pollutants Bacterial Indicators Preservation and Enhancement of Biological Many species of fish,shellfish, Toxics Including Habitats of Special Significance(SIOL) marine mammals,birds and metals,pesticides Waters support designated areas or habilals, vegetation including local coastal and other priority Including,but not limited to,established refuges, marshes. pollutants parka,sanctuaries,emloglcal reserves or preserves,and Areas of Special Biological Significance(ASBS),where the preservation and enhancement of natural resources requires special protection. Mariculture(MAR)Promotes the culture of Located In local coastal waters off Toxics Including plants and animals in marine waters independent Newport Beach is a licensed metals,pesticides of any pollution source. maricullure area located some and other priority miles to the south of the OCSD pollutants outall. Bacterial indicators Migration of Aquatic Organisms(MIGR) Them are many migratory spades, Temperature Supports and facilitates the migration of marine most conspicuous are the Clarity, organisms. Califomla gray whale and marine birds. Navigation(NAV) Includes waters used for Extensive local shipping and Floetables shipping,travel or other transportation by navigation with numerous Aesthetics private,commercial or military vessels. commercial and private boats in the Newport and Long Beach Harbor areas to the south and rroM of the District's outlall. Spawning,Reproduction and/or Early Many species of fish,shellfish. Toxics including Development(SPWN)Waters support high marina mammals,birds and metals,pesticides quality habitats necessary for reproduction and vegetation Including coastal and other priority, eery development of fish and wildlife. wetands subject to tidal exchange pollutants near Treatment Plant No.2. 'As designated in NPDES Permit and Basin Plan for Santa Ana River Region s See Appendix E for more detailed information j , yvsx4 0 a CJ p Je f �7 October 23, 2002 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress Attached you will find data on the progress staff has made and the impact on the final effluent by turning up the level of treatment. The percent of secondary treatment final effluent historical trends for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS) are shown. In addition, current data on the month's BOD, SS and disinfection effectiveness is shown on a schematic of the treatment system. What the data shows is that the increased level of treatment is reducing the final effluent BOD and SS and that the disinfection system is providing significant and consistent bacterial reduction. In the near future, staff will be posting this and other data on the effectiveness of the level of treatment increases and disinfection on the Web. If you have any comments, questions or would like additional data, please call me at 714-593-7020. RJO:pjm GAwp.dtalom%101FINAL1RJ01B0ARD Lepers-102302 Board Packet Cover Letter.doc DCSD 0 P.O,Box 8127 0 Fountaln VW1,,CA 927284127 0 (714)962-2411 Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Last Fiscal Year 2001-02 Progress to Secondary Standards Ending June 2002 Month: October 2002 1 47% 42% Advanced Advanced Primary (Ocean�Pipelin(ee Primary- Ocean Pipeline wamr ! !L wmm Dlelnieetlon6 MixeO MiKeE DecM1lorinatlon 53% 58% aw.:Aw.izxm Secondary Final Effluent: Secondary Boo = 72 mg/L Bacteria Reduction: 99.9%Average Goal: 99.7% Reduction TSS = 50 mg/L Chlorine Level toOCWV Ocean Discharge to OCWD Daily Maximum: 0.125 mg/L Permit Limit: Pennit Limit—Daily Maximum 1.45 mg/L BOD = 100 mg/L (Average of Eight Samples) TSS = 60 mg/L Final Effluent: Final Effluent Goal: BOD= 64 mglL BOO = 30 mg/L TSS = 39 mg/L TSS = 30 mg/L Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels s` Revision 10/23/02 Final Effluent Percent Secondary Treatment 65% Winter 2002 Goal = 64% 56% 57% . ...........Mont hy.p ..54% ........ 52l4 51% 52% 5p% 51% 61% 50% 45% 12-Month Running Average eD% JW Nq Sp Ccl Nw Oac ten Fa! My Iq Mry Jin Jul Np Bq On 3C01 3N3 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) ra� in Final Effluent M94- in Final Effluent 1998 Permit Limit = 100 mg/L 110 ........................................................................................................ .......73..................................70....�....'0....73............73....73 71 ........ 71 69 ]i 5 1998 Permit Limit. — 60 mg/L se 51 52 51 51 54 ...... .___�.... 56 50 .....954 ... 4g....67.....aB.....gg....A6. ............. SD ........................................................................................................ p ........................_....._......._................_............................................ 43 p ..............................._._-...._.................._......................_........._..... T SO .................................................Secondary Standard Goal = 30 mg/L ................................................. Secondary Standard Goal = 30 mg/L p ...... ............... .. ...................... ID . . . ................................I...... 16 ........................................................................................................ 15 ........................................................................................................ D 0 M " W Ov Mw Or Jn FO IN F{e Mry Jug M F+9 SW Jul Mg Sy W Mw Dv An Ftl My Pp Nry Jn M " S, Groundwater Replenishment System October 10, 2002 Endorsement List Health, Science and Education Date Anaheim Memorial Medical Center July 30, 2002 Anaheim Union High School District April 18, 2002 Chapman University, Department of Physical Sciences January 3,2002 Discovery Science Center March 5,2002 Fountain Valley Historical Society May 20,2002 Fountain Valley School District December 7,2001 Garden Grove Historical Society June 29. 2000 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian May 3,2002 Huntington Beach City School District April 16,2002 National Water Research Institute February 11,2002 Newport Bay Hospital February 21,2002 North Orange County United Teachers November 21,2001 Orange County City Engineers Association December 15, 1999 Santa Ana Unified School District May 31,2002 Savanna School District February 12,2002 Dr.Jack Skinner November 18, 1998 Sandra R.Smoley, R.N.-Former Agency Secretary,California Health and Welfare Agency August 9,2002 Society of Women Engineers October 3,2000 American Business Women's Association September 24,2002 Baywood Development Group June 11, 2002 Building Industry Association, Orange County Chapter June 13,2002 Centex Homes June 12,2002 Downtown Santa Ana Business Association June 19,2002 Hall &Foreman, Inc. February 10,2000 Hearthside Homes June 12,2002 John Laing Homes June 13,2002 Orange County Business Council January 21, 1998 Orange County Taxpayers Association November 30, 1998 Rainbow Disposal April 1, 1999 Ramirez International May 21,2002 R.J. Medrano&Associates April 8,2002 Singapore American Business Association of Southern California July 19,2002 The Robert Mayer Corporation January 15, 2001 Trammell Crow Company December 11, 1998 The Wilck Group September 17,2002 William Lyon Homes, Inc. June 12,2002 W NC & Associates June 12,2002 County Orange County Board of Supervisors August 18, 1998 Cities City of Anaheim March 27,2001 City of Beverly Hills September 20,2001 City of Brea September 27, 1999 City of Buena Park November 28,2000 City of Burbank August 8,2001 City of Costa Mesa January 3,2000 City of Cypress October 25, 1999 City of Fountain Valley September 7, 1999 City of Fullerton October 19, 1999 City of Huntington Beach March 15, 1999 City of Irvine October 26, 1999 City of La Habra August 16, 1999 Groundwater Replenishment System October 10.2002 Endorsement List City of La Palma October 5, 1999 ' City of Los Alamitos October 11, 1999 City of Newport Beach August 23, 1999 City of Placentia September 7, 1999 City of San Fernando November 19. 2001 City of Santa Ana January 16,2001 City of Santa Monica September 27,2001 City of Seal Beach November 22, 1999 City of Stanton September 14, 1999 City of Torrance August 8, 2001 City of Tustin October 18, 1999 City of Villa Park August 24, 1999 City of Westminster July 27, 1999 Assemblyman Bill Campbell July 16, 2002 Assemblyman John Campbell September 17,2001 Assemblyman Lou Correa March 11,2002 Congressman Christopher Cox May 21,2002 Assemblywoman Lynn Daucher June 27, 2002 Senator Dianne Feinstein October 9, 1996 Assemblyman Tom Harman March 21,2002 State Senator Ross Johnson April 3,2002 Former Congressman Ron Packard (N/A) Congressman Edward R. Royce May 23,2002 Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez April 6,2000 Blue Planet Foundation September 1, 1999 Groundwater Foundation October 19, 1998 Mono Lake Committee December 24,2001 Orange Coast Watch March 22,2001 Orange County CoastKeeper January 14,2002 Sierra Club, Orange County November 16, 1999 Sisters of St. Joseph/Orange, Honoring Women and Creation(environmental group) December 13,2000 Surfrider Foundation of Huntington Beach/LB Chapter January 22, 1998 Chambers of Commerce Greater Anaheim Chamber of Commerce October 5, 1998 - Brea Chamber of Commerce March 2,2000 Costa Mesa Chamber of Commerce March 7, 2000 Fullerton Chamber of Commerce February 9,2000 Garden Grove Chamber of Commerce June 9, 1998 Hispanic Chamber of Commerce July 8, 1998 Irvine Chamber of Commerce October 11, 1999 Korean Chamber of Commerce August 29,2002 Los Alamitos Chamber of Commerce April 6,2000 Newport Harbor Chamber of Commerce September 29, 1999 Orange Chamber of Commerce September 28, 1999 Placentia Chamber of Commerce September 21, 1999 Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce October 9,2001 Stanton Chamber of Commerce May 12,2000 Tustin Chamber of Commerce March 16,2000 Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce May 18, 1998 West Orange County Legislative Committee(Coalition of Cypress, La Palma,&Los July 13,2000 Alamitos area Chambers of Commerce) Yorba Linda Chamber of Commerce May 10,2000 Groundwater Replenishment System October 10, 2002 Endorsement List . ...,.: Community Organizations Anaheim Evening Lions Club October 1, 1999 Anaheim High 12 March 7, 2000 Anaheim Host Lions Club September 26,2002 Anaheim Optimists January 31,2000 Brea Noon Lions Club January 18, 2002 Brea Republican Women, Federated May 30,2001 Costa Mesa-Orange Coast Breakfast Lions Club September 7,2000 Fountain Valley Woman's Club December 5,2001 Fullerton Host Lions Club March 4, 2001 Garden Grove Evening Kiwanis October 25, 2001 Garden Grove Host Lions Club September 19, 2002 Garden Grove Republican Women Federated November 3, 2001 Hispanic Business Women Association April 5, 2002 Huntington View Garden Club June 9,2002 Izaak Walton League of Fullerton September 22, 2001 Kansas Club/Leisure World,Seal Beach October 4, 1999 Kiwanis Club of Cypress August 19, 1999 Kiwanis Club of Tustin October 1,2002 League of Women Voters of Orange County March 26, 1999 Los Amigos of Orange County October 6, 2001 Newport Harbor Exchange Club April 27,2000 North County Sertoma Club August 21,2002 Orange Empire Sertoma July 29,2002 Retired Oil Men's Club March 15, 2000 Rotary Club of Fullerton February 3, 1999 Sertoma Club of Anaheim September 24, 2002 Soroptimist of Buena Park May 3,2000 Stanton Lions Club November 17,2001 Sunrise Exchange Club September 17, 2002 Tustin Area Republican Women November 30, 2001 Agriculture Date Orange County Farm Bureau October 1, 1999 Water Agencies and Associations Date American Water Works Association (AWWA) July 27, 1998 American Water Works Association/Cal-Nev Section (AWWA) June 6, 1998 California-American Water Company October 10,2001 California Association of Sanitation Agencies May 13,2002 California Water Environment Association July 3,2002 Central Basin Municipal Water District October 16, 2001 Compton Municipal Services Water Department February 6,2002 Costa Mesa Sanitary District September 17,2000 East Orange County Water District November 8, 1999 Eastern Municipal Water District October 17,2001 Foothill Municipal Water District August 22,2001 Glendale Water&Power October 17,2001 Inland Empire Utilities Agency August 13,2001 Las Virgenes Municipal Water District August 23,2001 Long Beach Water Department September 10,2001 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power(LADWP) August 10, 2001 Mesa Consolidated Water District October 14, 1999 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California January 9,2002 Moulton Niguel Water District March 19, 2001 Municipal Water District of Orange County September 2, 1998 Groundwater Replenishment System October 10, 2002 Endorsement List Orange County Sanitation District (AVA) Orange County Water District March 15,2000 Pasadena Water and Power April 22,2002 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority December 12,2000 Serrano Water District December 9, 1998 Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works June 10, 1999 Southern California Water Alliance June 10, 1998 Southern California Water Committee December 18, 1998 Southern California Water Company December 12,2001 Three Valleys Municipal Water District September 5,2001 Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District August 16,2001 West Basin Municipal Water District October 16, 2001 Western Municipal Water District September 19,2t101 Yorba Linda Water District January 26,2001 frdBitional Groups and Organ!Eg oAs;n;,, -* Anaheim Police Officers Political Action Committee July 17,2002 Anaheim Resort RV Park February 12,2002 Cabrillo Mobile Home Park March 15,2002 DoubleTree Hotel of Anaheim/Orange County March 1,2002 Friendly Village Mobile Home Park April 16,2002 Huntington Harbour Mobile Estates April 22, 2002 Island View Mobile Home Park March 6,2002 La Lampara Mobile Home Estates March 4,2002 Lido Isle Community Association August 19,2002 Orange County Fire Chiefs Association March 26,2002 Quiet Village Mobile Home Park March 14,2002 Tradewinds Mobile Home Park April 10,2002 30 individuals from Retired Public Employees'Association September 2,2000 Fire Chief James Ellis-Costa Mesa Fire Department December 10,2001 J.L. Gates-Head of Water Utility Science& Public Works Dept., Santiago Canyon College December 11,2001 Ron Linsky-Executive Director, National Water Research Institute February 11,2002 Bobby McDonald-President, Black Chamber of Commerce of O.C. May 2,2002 Anuradha Prakash-Chair, Department of Physical Sciences January 3,2002 Linda Sarno, Esq.-President,Asian Business Association of O.C. June 13,2002 Joan Irvine Smith January 7, 1998 Van Thai Tran-Mayor Pro Tempore, City of Garden Grove May 24,2002 Henry J.Vaux,Jr.-Professor of Resource Economics, University of California October 3,2001 John Withers-Board Member, California Regional Water Quality Control Board& July 25,2002 Director, Irvine Ranch Water District kv ORANGE COUNTY 2rvuk71am,Suile 100•Irv1ne,W1TNa926E4-59o4 BUSINESS COUNCIL phone:949.476.2242.fax:949.476.9240•urfw .acbc.org ErxamE "HMEE October 15, 2002 awxR,n Fm� Hon. Shirley McCracken m Fauna President, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 ETFApI1FR Re: Groundwater Replenishment System —Support naauauw. gA°tl°CO Dear Ms. McCracken: xm�„malq The Orange County Business Council (OCBC/Business Council) has learned E that critical votes on the Groundwater Replenishment System are coming nanwNux before the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) board of directors this EnPS week. The Orange County Business Council urges OCSD to move forward EaFN�cA.v.r,� quickly but prudently with this project. viaawaRnw „°ROn The Business Council supports the Groundwater Replenishment System (GRS) project because it will responsibly preserve and reuse scarce water resources and because it will help Orange County to become less dependent upon imported water. We note that the project has attracted significant levels of grant funding and is moving forward in a collaborative fashion. naEauaxw. wxNousnEvenvemn As the OCSD board of directors moves to formalize agreements with the Orange County Water District and to commence construction, the Business Council urges you to exercise discretion in adapting a project schedule that vos a� protects the county's water reliability but spreads the project's financial burdens across as much time as possible. These are difficult times for Exnrmena Fl¢mExr, families and businesses; we must act with vision and foresight to meet our " E•,�, infrastructure needs but with prudence as well to minimize unnecessarily onerous impacts for ratepayers. Pcw.oeuwra rovmaF eTanaa la��a�,• Thank you for your consideration. na Pt ,, wNnaan a Sincerely, Eatlw k I.x�---4-a-L- Stan Oftelie Julie Puentes President & CEO Executive V.P. Public Affairs SHAPING ORANGE COUNTY'S ECONOMIC FUTURE PARSONS Pansons Inhasi ucturo&Technology Group Inc. 100 West Walnut Street•Pasadena.California 91124-(626)440-6000•Fas.(626)440 6195 October 15,2002 Board of Directors ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92729-8127 Subject: Support for the Orange County Groundwater Replenishment System(GWRS) Dear Members of the Board of Directors: The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD),together with your partners,Orange County Water District(OCWD)have joined together to plan,construct and operate one of the most important water reclamation projects in our history. The joint Boards have given support and resources for this exciting project for the past several years during its planning and permitting phases. Now comes the time to move GWRS from the drawing board into reality. GWRS is right for the citizen-rate payers of the communities you represent. It will significantly improve our environment and our ocean It will protect our vital groundwater basin from saltwater intrusion. It will build up our groundwater reserve,which reduces our dependence on costly imported water, water which may become scarce in the future.It will help protect us from future droughts. GWRS will help us hedge future,higher costs of imported water. It will save energy. In short,GWRS is right for Orange County. Your approval of the next phase of the GWRS project is vital. It is a bold and expensive step. It appears all roadblocks have been removed.The opportunity to do the right thing is at hand. I respectively urge the Board to approve staffs recommendation to proceed with the construction phase of GWRS. As a 44-year resident of Orange County, I thank you for your continued support of the GWRS project Respectfully, PARSONS William H. Tappan cc: Blake P. Anderson (OCSD) OVirginia Grebbien (OCWD) l ,N � r � E 10-23-02 02:52P Fro DCaD 714-063-0201 T-203 P.02/02 F-410 Taliforifin o.nm�wmarr.cc 5 .w.c...c zncr". nca�e�^?rr�� c SENATOR DICK ACKERMAN r�mn.cn az.< .c.ur vo.nYr¢..r.• .m:raza ThIRTY-ThiRD SENATORIAL DISTRICT c.�+•.In.wm.cmm Ocrober 23,2002 Mr.Ron Wildermuth Public Infotmation Officer Orange County We=District - - -- P.O.Box 8300 Fountain Valley.California 92728-8300 Dear Mr. Wildermuth. - I am writing to expeess my suppon for the Groundwater Replenishment System. Tbis visionary Project will benefit the citizens of Orange County as woll as many Californians. This locally controlled system will provide a new source of water to meet the needs of - approximately 140,000 Orange County families annually. I minuend the Orange County Water District's and the Orange County Sanitation Disnicr's work to diversify the existing water st2gply system. ilitimmely.The system will reduce the mu ity's dependence on imported water hom other states and from Northem California. The Groundwater Replenishment System is an important part of Orange County's and California's fume. This project provides an environmentally friendly method m augment local supplies in and regions. In addition,This revolutionary system most likely will serve as a technological example to be replicated thmuglwut the world. I commend your organization for its leadership- Sincerely, p�11 &6t,kl1d5� DICK ACKERMAN Senamr,33w Disuict DAisv STATE CAPITOL K{5j$ Xj'[ CHAIR: P.O.BoI(90 9 C Z U +_ AGINGANOLONGTERMCARE SACRA MENIO,CAB1249-0OR !(Tttlifanda FEMistaturr (010)015AM MEMBER: FAX( M)010@1T2 APPROPRIATIONS BUDGET Va CTOFNCE LOCAL GOVERNMENT 210 W.BIRCH smear,/ZO2 WATER,PARXSAND WILDLIFE BREA,CAB2B21 (714)6724r04 FAX(r14)0T2470r LYNN DAUCHHR ASSEMOLYMEMSER,SEVENTTSECOND UI Jcr October 23,2002 Dear Chair McCracken: I would like to once again state my support for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS). As a region,we face a looming water shortage of crisis proportions. We must create alternative sources of water for Orange County and Southern California. We can't just talk about the need for creating new sources of water,we must take action—and GWRS is the right solution. As a state legislator, I understand the political aspects and challenges of the project. Therefore,I think I can say with both the knowledge and experience that this project deserves to become a reality. We owe it to Orange County and Southern California- Without alternative sources of water such as GWRS we will face the coming years with a drastic shortage of water. The residents of Orange County and of California expect us to proactively address water supply issues. GWRS is a positive step in securing a reliable and ongoing supply of water for our county. ;7 � Sincerely, ------- Lynn Daucher Assemblywoman, 72nd District PnnIAYm Recnkr/PA"w Zoo@ LEL6Z WL XVA OC:OT ZO/EZ/Or ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 10/23/02 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (MURPHY)........................ ALVAREZ........................ (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................JG ✓ (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD.................... — (MILLER).......................... BRADY ........................ N (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ................... ---y— — (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE.............. ✓ Y — (CRANDALL).................... COOK, LAURANN.......... _ ✓ ✓ _� (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE..................... _� w — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. �� — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... j� �[ — (DUVALL)......................... ...................—� (DEBOLT)......................... JEMPSA...................... (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... ✓ (SMITH)............................ KROM........................ �. a__ (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES..........................�L A — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... i (CHRISTY) ....................... MC GUIGAN.................. ✓ ✓ (SIMONOFF).................... MOORE........................ . i — (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............. _ L — (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ ✓ (KEENAN) ........................ PIERGY........................ (ADAMS) ......................... RIDGEWAY................... ✓ — (DOW) .............................. SIGLER......................... � ✓ — (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SILVA........................... (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... STAFF: Anderson Ghirelli Kyle ✓ =ey iJ win �...•w.thews— Mile r � ilti^ ( Ooten Tomka Streed OTHERS: , , Woodruff ✓ � IJ, Andrus Nixon 06/19/02 G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\DIRECTOR\Directors Roll Call.doc 1 F SIGN-IN SHEET �p ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (/ o? 3 o?00 1 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) G/S/f U/V AMRK-EL I4-4MCAAs ,&W O� �DYNF�2 g r✓L — EF -a* e 5 i wv- Vk,+nrr z Le p- FlN �/1 1115 — /�E N Ivls 3,a1<li/� ,�/�T� rQCSGGr/L[t �Opv )yito OA allsth CM sD f✓/ s. HAWPWAIADMI MFORMMIGN-IN FORM.DOC REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ail persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest l I� should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: A9 - 2-3 — O Y AGENDA ITEM NO. �5 G NAME: (please print) ��iy✓ ih /�O C_� HOME ADDRESS: �y`�7U /g(�UctY/h^2 CiirL (number/street) �=Ulf 9a7ya' (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: (_) J 7S" REPRESENTING: ��`!S (self/name 6f organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS j All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given tto� the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Z� QGG * * _ * * * * * AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: -206 % r7C-UG"' i,A (number/street) C 04-6 /9 P4 e- H412 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( Tjer 6 7 S-- REPRESENTING: �AAif` IL KSG T�v/.i (self/name of organization) !REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS I L Ail persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: J L L AGENDA ITEM NO. S� NAME: (please print) 1 * * * * * * M Ci HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: (_) REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the' meeting for distribution. DATE: `( b a3 O AGENDAITEMNO. f yU1tL ��" ��' NAME: (please print) . . . . , . �f g L✓��. . . . . . . . . . HOME ADDRESS: f SV30 1Lcc0kVaV s+ S-t• i:P (q6 (number/street) wX�+/,., CA (city/zip code) I q TELEPHONE: /1 / � ! 6�5 S r REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES J REQUIRED) must be given to the -)Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: L�l v AGENDA ITEM NO. S Cc NAME: (please print) n�e� * ^�x HOME ADDRESS: 2-67 'f 7 P I ! l 6 5 ✓ O A/ �. (number/street) (cciittyyj/zip code) TELEPHONE: 7 J 61 —1-6`2 REPRESENTING: d / G , Tz2s'K (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS lJ All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. i DATE: IO -Z T' D Z AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 C Y/�# NAME: (please print) 11/�(1 F lti L W Ma HOME ADDRESS: I IORI S P-d�'AIJ dztj6 ' (number/street) `/ y/ L �( A �/ p �('nil/4 I��'/!G�/ C� "1 Z�D"( / (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: () y -2 Kk(P7 REPRESENTING: < li�-!./" (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 5 All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES ' REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 0 ( 0 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) IL U� L ny �� .0 �`)Iy+.,, rr HOMEADDRESS: "l �i DtO Ne&,TG YU �YASl (number/street) G- (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: Gy ?1 - 2 �� REPRESENTING: Z) Ct L'kV —DhT 'IAV (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ail persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: TJ L AGENDA ITEM NO. /Se- NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: MIl-2 R1. ehs 4E/ AV'f ll (number/street) (city/zip code) J �j TELEPHONE: (y� REPRESENTING T(�/��N�—{/A'/FI7/c1fisV (sel name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS j All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 14673 O AGENDA ITEM NO. [SG NAME: (please print) (` 1 oc + + V ( t ��Q�2— HOME ADDRESS: 3 � [ E` ��'' �"` (number/street) 92-2� (city/Alp code) p^�,+/ TELEPHONE: (7n l ) 13 - I l X / REPRESENTING: klM(3 U.0AV'0VICD (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: l 0^Z?j -0 Q—. AGENDArITEM NO. J NAME: (please print) • • * • ` * e enny •O '✓� e 'pp��• e '4 e ' ' e HOME ADDRESS: �— 17p �' G't /(I\I I A (number/street) p Y (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: L32dg U� T['SfCtN 17i.(Si�Nk .fS (self/name of organization) � .� REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS l% All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: R'- (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( 14) 62,I " 4lfgJC REPRESENTING: >C-7 L"j= (self/name of organization) CHAIR'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF October 23, 2002 (REPORT 2 OF 3) THE STANDING COMMITTEES WILL BE MEETING AT THEIR USUAL TIMES NEXT MONTH. PLEASE CHECK THE LIST ON THE MEETING NOTICE IN YOUR AGENDA PACKAGES FOR THE DATES. ALL COMMITTEE MEETINGS BEGIN AT 5 PM 2. THERE WILL BE A SPECIAL STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7 BEGINNING AT 3 P.M. THE DISTRICT'S WASHINGTON DC LOBBYISTS WILL BE DISCUSSING THEIR PLANS FOR ASSISTING THE DISTRICT WITH OBTAINING GRANT FUNDING FOR IMPROVED TREATMENT. 3. A MEETING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED WITH THE AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 21 . THIS MEETING WILL ALSO BEGIN AyP3�P.M. i 4. THE STEERING COMMITTEE HAS SET A SPECIAL ,/INFORMATIONAL BOARD WORKSHOP FOR THE 3RD WEDNESDAY EVENING IN FEBRUARY-THE 19TR. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WILL TO GIVE NEW DIRECTORS AND RETURNING DIRECTORS WITH AN OVERVIEW OF THE OPERATION OF THE DISTRICT'S FACILITIES AND OF THE DISTRICT'S RESEARCH AND MONITORING ACTIVITIES. ADDITIONAL WORKSHOPS, HELD QUARTERLY DURING 2003 WILL COVER OTHER SUBJECTS TO GIVE THE BOARD A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE SANITATION DISTRICT WORKS AND WHAT LIES AHEAD FOR US. 5. AND ONE LAST THING, GO ANGELS! -I z REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2002, AT 5 P.M. (REPORT 3 OF 3) 1 . THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 25T" STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING WERE APPROVED, AND I ASK THAT THE BOARD SECRETARY RECEIVE AND FILE THEM. 2. 1 REPORTED THAT THE NEXT CASA CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD IN PALM SPRINGS JANUARY 15T" THROUGH THE 18T". MEMBERS OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE ARE THE DISTRICT'S REPRESENTATIVES AT THIS CONFERENCE AND I URGE THEM ALL TO ATTEND. I WOULD NOTE HERE THAT ATTENDANCE AT CASA PROVIDES US WITH A DEEPER UNDERSTANDING OF THE TECHNICAL, REGULATORY AND FINANCIAL CHALLENGES FACING ALL WASTEWATER AGENCIES IN CALIFORNIA. 3. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT 3 A. BLAKE ANDERSON MADE A PRESENTATION ON THE ORANGE COUNTY INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD ROLLOUT, WHICH WAS HELD ON OCTOBER 10T". HE WILL REVIEW THE RESULTS OF THE REPORT CARD WITH YOU IN TONIGHT'S MEETING. B. BLAKE ALSO PROVIDED AN OVERVIEW OF THE MAJOR ELEMENTS IN THE GWRS AGREEMENT AND THE AMENDED BUDGET. THIS WILL ALSO BE DISCUSSED IN TONIGHT'S MEETING. 4. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. BOB GHIRELLI REPORTED ON OUR ADVOCACY ACTIVITIES IN WASHINGTON, DC. AFTER DISCUSSION, THE COMMITTEE AGREED TO HOLD A SPECIAL STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7T" BEGINNING AT 3 P.M. TO MEET WITH OUR DC CONSULTANTS WHO WILL HELP US SEEK 2 FEDERAL FUNDS TO OFFSET SOME OF THE COST OF OUR OCEAN PROTECTION EFFORTS. B. MR. GHIRELLI ALSO PROVIDED THE DIRECTORS WITH A COPY OF THE DRAFT OCEAN PERMIT APPLICATION AND DISCUSSED THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. TI IS-W LL C& T' C. BLAKE ANDERSON REPORTED ON ONGOING DISCUSSIONS THAT HE HAS HAD WITH THE GENERAL MANAGER OF SAWPA TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTE OVER PAYMENTS FOR THE ENGINEERING WORK ON THE SARI LINE AND THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF THE REACH OF THE LINE THAT REQUIRES RELOCATION OR IN-RIVER PROTECTION. THE COMMITTEE DIRECTED BLAKE AND TOM WOODRUFF TO vim_ 4 �3 q - . (-Aley "w S�rw�si D. THE AGENDA ITEMS SCHEDULED TO BE PRESENTED TO THE STANDING COMMITTEES IN NOVEMBER WERE REVIEWED. 3 E. THE AGENDA ITEMS FOR TONIGHT'S BOARD MEETING WERE REVIEWED. CLARIFICATIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY STAFF AS NEEDED. 5. THERE WAS ONE EXISTING MATTER OF LITIGATION INVOLVING KERN COUNTY THAT WAS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION. THIS WILL ALSO BE DISCUSSED IN TONIGHT'S CLOSED SESSION. THE RESULTS OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION WILL BE PROVIDED AT THAT TIME. a STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on y , 200�. was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on OLM& I7 , 200--2, fii4 y� IIN�WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this �7 day of 2003 Penny M. Kyle, ecretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District GAWRDTANDMIN\BSTOBMPAGENDA CEBTIFICATION.DOC T ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT . T - Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) October 16, 2002 Board Secretary phone: 1J141 aG2 2411 To the Chair and Members ""` P141'JG2-0356 of the Board of Directors www."ced.com Subject: Board Letter menmg.a Pn. Boa SI27 B Fountain Valley..9 C4 9272B-e127 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional street.ddress: information on any of the items, please call me. 1 eB44 Ellla Avenue po°stem vaoay,CA,92708-701e Oranae County Infrastructure Report Card Results: The News about Sewers is not Good Age cies On October 10, the Orange County Infrastructure Report Card was announced at the • Beckman Center at UCI. The American Society of Civil Engineers, the UCI Civil and Dfnaa Environmental Associates, Cal RAC, the Orange County Business Council, and the Center for a New Orange County participated in the effort. Eight broad infrastructure aneneim areas were graded for capacity, condition and operation. Newspaper articles and area Baer Park other materials supporting the report card are attached. Cypress coo"Lam u°sy Fullerton Grades were given for wastewater, stormwater/runoff, water, landfills, schools, parks, Garda" Grnaa roads and airports. Grades ranged from B to D with an average of C for Orange Ma"u"gm" I'm. County infrastructure as a whole. Wastewater facilities received a C+, o-dn Le Ha6re stormwater/runoff received a D, and water received a B (but with a cautionary note to Palma about future water supplies). Los Alamitos Newport Beach ora"ga As I said, wastewater facilities received an overall grade of C+. But it's important to Plana"Lla keep in mind that there are two components behind the grade. Sewage treatment sento Ana P 9 9 Seal Batch facilities received a grade of B+while local sewers received a grade of C-. s`a"`a" Obviously, the grades imply that much more needs to be done to improve the Mach Villa Park capacity, condition and operation of the sewers here in Orange County. Ywts Linde Dsagev of Orange But can the community have confidence in the results? We think so. A technical committee of experts from around the county--with our own Nick Arhontes chairing Bonito" Districts the effort--conducted an analysis of the treatment facilities and sewers throughout the county. They provided the preliminary grades. Then a review committee of critical costa mesa stakeholders checked the grades proposed by the technical committee. Jerry midway cltr Thibeault, the Executive Officer of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Julie Water Districts Puentes, the Executive Vice President of the Orange County Business Council and eWna Ranch Garry Brown, the Executive Director of the Orange County Coastkeeper were on the review committee. We think that the complementary expertise of the technical and review committees gives all parties reason to have confidence in the grades. Some may quibble and may want to shift the grades up or down a bit, but the overall conclusion that can be drawn is solid, well documented, and straightforward: much more needs to be done to preserve and rehabilitate our infrastructure. "More" means billions of dollars of investment over the next 20 years. To maintain warld.clase leadersh,p in wastewater end water resource management. 'J2ti s. Members of the Board Page 2 October 16, 2002 - So, we have a report card. Now what? Committees are forming around that question. Understanding funding gaps, developing meaningful public education and outreach, promoting best professional practices, coordinating with state and federal - officials, and outreaching to local elected officials are the kind of initiatives that will be undertaken next. For the Sanitation District's part, most of these issues are familiar, well planned, sufficiently funded and underway. We have a 20-year capital improvement program that identifies over 170 projects that will be necessary to rehabilitate, upgrade, and expand our facilities to maintain uninterrupted service to our community. We will achieve secondary treatment standards in the earliest possible time and are currently updating our CIP to make that happen. We know from where our funding sources are coming and regularly forecast future user fee rates that are reported to the Board and to the public. We have accumulated construction reserves that will be used with new borrowings to pay for our 20-year CIP, currently estimated to cost$1.9 billion. We have an active advocacy program at the state and federal levels through the professional associations to which we belong as well as through the consultants we employ to work on our behalf. But we also must acknowledge that we must promote the interests of our member cities and special districts as well, if conditions are going to improve. Remember this startling fact: there are over 14,000 miles of local and private sewer lines feeding into our regional interceptor system, which means there are more than 30 times more of "their' lines than "our'lines. For this reason, we have an active cooperative projects program that provides 50%matching grants to the cities and special districts in our service area for certain qualifying sewer improvement projects. We also have an active technical outreach program with most of the cities and special districts in our service area. We are working closely with them on managing restaurant grease and on achieving the new Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements for the operation of local sewer systems. As President of Cal RAC and as your General Manager, I will continue to promote activism, cooperation and creativity within the community of public agencies around us. I'm hopeful that the report card will be the first step in getting community leaders to take notice and to take part in this effort. Orange County's future economic vitality, quality of life and environmental quality will depend on well- managed and maintained public infrastructure. EPA Gets Tough with Laguna Beach A recent enforcement action by EPA against the City of Laguna Beach is an example of the tougher posture we can expect EPA to take against municipalities with sewer problems, particularly where they result in beach closures. See the attached news Members of the Board Page 3 October 16, 2002 release from EPA that contains details of the action. I suspect EPA is using cases like this to bolster their argument for the need for the CMOM regulations. This is not the first time EPA has enforced against a municipality in Southern California to fix - sewer infrastructure--they sued the City of Los Angeles several years ago and forced them to create a grease management program within the city that now employs some 40 people to deal with the problem. Legislative Initiatives Through the efforts of Assemblymember Bill Campbell legislation was introduced (AB 1969)and signed by the Governor that ensures the District can proceed to construct secondary facilities without the threat of mandatory minimum penalties of $3000 per day. The District is seeking similar protections at the federal level while it negotiates with EPA to renew its NPDES permit to achieve the secondary treatment standard. With the support of members of the Orange County congressional delegation report language has been introduced into the FY 2003 VA-HUD appropriations bill to state Congress' intent that the District would be able to plan, design and construct full secondary treatment without the threat of lawsuits and penalties when the current permit expires. Hearings on the bill are expected to occur in mid-October. District staff and consultants are working with the delegation and the appropriations committee to ensure the report language is contained in the final bill. A copy of the delegation letter signed by Representatives Cox, Rohrabacher and Sanchez requesting the report language is attached. State Legislative Wrap-up The 2001-02 regular session came to a close and the Assembly and the Senate worked intensely to pass bills before the August 31 deadline. Hundreds of these bills were sent to the Governor for his signature. The Governor then had until September 30 to sign or veto the many bills that had been placed on his desk. The attached tables show the status of the bills that Orange County Sanitation District's Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division (ECM) has been tracking in the state and federal legislation. These bills were tracked In order to assess their regulatory impacts and other issues pertaining to public works facilities. Bills sponsored by OCSO were AB 1982 and AB 1969. Biosolids Spill Workshop On April 17, 2002, we had a biosolids just outside of the Plant 1 entrance. To improve spill response and communication, the District recently hosted a biosolids spill workshop to share the lessons that we had learned with the agencies and jurisdictions that may be involved in future biosolids spills. Fifty-six individuals attending, representing OCSD, city and county public works, police and fire department, regulators, other POTW staff, biosolids contractors, biosolids haulers, and Caltrans. The presentations focused on spill prevention, spill response, the basics of biosolids, press relations, regulatory perspectives, and a briefing on the April 17 spill. Nearly half the attendees filled out an OCSD customer Members of the Board Page 4 October 16, 2002 service survey in which they stated that the workshop was very valuable. Comments ranged from "you should make the workshop an annual event"to "this will help with future biosolids spills." Overall, the workshop seemed to be informative and reach the intended audience. Kern County Biosolids Update In 1999, the Kern County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance to regulate the land application of biosolids. Also in 1999,the Kern County adopted a successor ordinance that allows the land application of Class A— Exceptional Quality(EQ) biosolids. Kern County proposes that the current policy of banning the land application of Class B biosolids on January 1, 2003, be maintained. However, Kern County has recently determined that the existing ordinance provides insufficient information regarding land application of Class A EQ biosolids. Kern County staff has drafted amendments to the ordinance that would require significant new testing, permitting and inspection terms and conditions. The proposed ordinance, as currently written, would continue to allow the use of all forms of Class A EQ biosolids. The proposed ordinance is posted on the Kern County website at www.co.kern.ca.us/rma. District's staff and counsel are reviewing the proposed ordinance. Kern County conducted a workshop on October 15, 2002. The final ordinance is scheduled to be considered by the Board on November 26, 2002. District staff will attend these meetings and will provide a report to the Board. EPA Releases its Clean Water and Drinking Water Infrastructure Gap Analysis On September 30th, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) released The Clean Water and Drinking Water Infrastructure Gap Analysis, which identifies projected needs and projected spending for water and wastewater during the next 20 years. The study provides an important basis for addressing the critical needs of our water infrastructure. The Gap Analysis covers the period from 2000 to 2019 and includes estimates of the funding gap for capital and O&M. For clean water, the estimates of investment needs and spending cover 16,000 publicly owned treatment works (POTWs). The drinking water analysis covers 75,000 drinking water systems. The Gap Analysis presents the projected funding gap over the 20-year period in two ways: a "no revenue growth"scenario that compares the projected need to current spending levels; and a "revenue growth"scenario that assumes spending will increase by 3 percent per year. The "no revenue growth"scenario is useful for understanding the status quo. This analysis estimates a total capital payments gap of$122 billion, or about$6 billion per year, for clean water and $102 billion, or about$5 billion per year, for drinking water. Members of the Board Page 5 October 16, 2002 The O&M gap is estimated at$148 billion, or$7 billion per year, for clean water and $161 billion, or$8 billion per year, for drinking water. Under the"revenue growth" scenario, the capital gap is still $21 billion, or about$1 billion per year for clean water and $45 billion, or about$2 billion per year, for drinking water. The O&M gap is estimated at$10 billion, or$0.5 billion per year, for clean water, while no O&M funding gap would occur for drinking water. Copies of the Gap Analysis and the Needs Surveys are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1(800)426.4791, the Office of Water Resource Center at 1(800) 832.7828, and on the Internet at htto://www.epa.aov/owm/featinfo.htm Disinfection Update We continue to successfully disinfect our effluent. Measured bacterial reduction has been consistently greater than 98 percent and is usually greater than 99.6 percent. In other words, a 98 percent bacterial reduction represents a reduction in discharged bacteria that is 10 percent of what was previously discharged. When greater than 99.6 percent, the bacteria discharged is less than 1 percent of what was formerly discharged. Our effluent chlorine residual is zero. The PDC Committee has reviewed and sent to the full Board the design and procurement of additional improvements to the bleach/bi-sulfite system will serve our disinfection needs for approximately 3 to 5 years. After that time, we expect to have completed the research, planning, design and construction of permanent facilities that will provide the best overall method of cost-effective and environmentally protective disinfection. Back Bev Beginning October 7, the Orange County Sanitation District began the final phase of construction on the Back Bay Trunk Sewer project. As you may recall, phases 1-3 were completed last May. During this phase, the district will be making final pipe connections for the new sewer line. Construction crews will complete road paving on Back Bay Drive in two locations: just north of Shellmaker Road and on Back Bay Drive about 200 yards south of Big Canyon. Construction is scheduled to be completed by the first part of November. Please direct questions or concerns regarding the project to Sonja Wassgren, public information coordinator at (714) 593-7122, email sassgren@ocsd.com, or Mike Bock, construction project manager at (714) 593-7430. Members of the Board Page 6 October 16, 2002 Ground Water Replenishment System On Tuesday October 15, 2002, filming was completed for an educational 30-second television spot for the Ground Water Replenishment System project. The spot will begin appearing on local cable television stations in February. It will also feature the GWR System website (www.awrsystem.coml and encourage viewers to visit the site for further information. This is just one facet in a multifaceted education campaign to illustrate the need for the project. Bushard Trunk Sewer Replacement As part of the community outreach plan for Bushard trunkline sewer replacement project, a letter and project fact sheet will be mailed to approximately 12,000 residents and businesses in the vicinity of the construction work. Construction will take place in the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. The letter will include information on the project along with a detailed fact sheet and an invitation to attend a community open house. The open house will be held at Plant 2 on November 7, 2002 from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Construction managers and engineers will be available to answer questions and explain the project details. The letter also provides residents with a contact person for any questions and/or concerns they may have. For further information on the project please contact Sonja W assgren, public information coordinator at 714-593-7122 or Mike Bock, construction manager at 714-593-7340. Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt G%WF.DTAN M4LKETTEPS TOT EBON1DO IW=B LETTER.ppC Attachments 6 - - Thursday, October 10, 2002 O.C. will pay for neglect Oct. 10, 2002 - Orange County Register Orange Grove By Wallace Walrod with Sarah Layton Wallace Walrod is president of The Center for a New Orange County. Wallace is executive v.p. of California Rebuild America Coalition. Every day, Orange County's infrastructure directly affects the lives of all residents, from our children's schools to the roads we travel. What happens when we do not maintain and invest in this common resource? Blackouts, traffic congestion, beach closures, deteriorating schools and neglected parks. As recent headlines about these sorts of problems confirm, Orange County's physical infrastructure is at a critical juncture. What do these infrastructure challenges really mean? How can we get credible assessments of the extent of these problems? The just-released Orange County Infrastructure Report Card - developed by an advisory council of public and private sector civil engineers - is a start. The coalition assigned letter grades to eight key categories, showing how our key infrastructure systems measure up and following the same methodology used in the 2001 infrastructure report card for the nation as a whole. Orange County's infrastructure received an overall grade of C, compared to the U.S. overall D+. Individual grades ranged from B (water, solid waste) to D (urban runoff/flood control). Reduced federal and state infrastructure funding combined with growing populations have placed a tremendous and increasing burden on our aging power plants, water and sewer systems, streets and roads, and school facilities. The old saying is that you get what you pay for, and Orange County has not been paying its way for decades. The county's grades reflect this. Not just our infrastructure, but statewide policies and processes dealing with infrastructure are broken. Over time, state revenues going to counties and local governments for infrastructure are down dramatically. In the 1960s, some 20 percent of the state general fund went to.infrastructure. Today, it is about 3 percent. At the same time, the demands on existing infrastructure to service a growing population and economy have skyrocketed. Our vital infrastructure systems are aging and under maintained; overloaded and unprepared for the future. This problem is not trivial. The economic engine that has made Orange County the world's 30th- largest economy cannot continue without adequate, high-quality infrastructure. Businesses have and will continue to leave the county if we fail to address the systems and facilities that allow our businesses to efficiently and dependably manufacture and move goods, provide services, and attract and retain a high-quality work force. The good news is that new investment in county infrastructure is a proven, ongoing, job-creating economic stimulus. Orange County residents already know this. In early 2002, The Center for a New Orange County asked the public about the best course of action to ensure a healthy future for the county. The answer was unequivocal: Infrastructure will play a key role in the county's economy and is intricately tied to our quality of life. Polling by the Orange County Business Council and Cal State Fullerton showed 90 percent of residents regard infrastructure as "extremely' or "very' important. These results set a benchmark by which we can measure our future progress. We believe that the impartial evaluation found in the Orange County Infrastructure Report Card is a powerful tool for beginning the discussion about how best to address our needs. At the same time, the 2002 report cans will allow the county to confront the challenge of identifying the top priorities for maintenance, repair and investment. Ultimately, this report card also demonstrates how critical it is that we begin working collaboratively on the infrastructure challenge. Wise decisions will demand more accountability, better planning and a clear investment strategy. We will need to reallocate existing resources, so these decisions will not necessarily be easy. But we must hold our elected political leaders responsible for making infrastructure renewal a high priority. Too much is at stake. 6 - . Wastewater " A well operating wastewater collection and treatment system is essential to meeting the objective of sustaining the quality of life and economic vitality of Orange County and protecting public health and _ the environment. Wastewater collection and treatment systems in Orange County have received more public attention in the past three years than ever before. The beach closures during the summer of 1999 caused considerable loss of public access to affected beaches, and acutely focused the public's attention on ocean pollution issues and their possible causes. Our beaches are regional treasures used by millions of tourists and residents annually, and must be protected from all forms of human pollution. A well-funded and operated wastewater infrastructure will help achieve this goal. A survey of all public wastewater system operators in Orange County using the American Society of Civil Engineers national format was conducted to assess the state of our county wastewater infrastructure. The following is a synopsis of the results and recommendations which were noted as a result of the grading process: Special districts, whose revenues are dedicated to the single purpose of maintaining the sewer collection system, and municipalities with dedicated sewer fees generally received better grades than municipalities whose wastewater departments had to compete with police, fire, and parks for general fund revenues. By far the most stressed wastewater infrastructure facility is the sewer pipeline collection system. Many sewer systems in Orange County, particularly in older cities, have reached their design life before they are replaced. As their condition deteriorates, older sewers are more prone to root intrusion, offset joints, debris and grease build-up, and site-specific failure. Renewing Orange County's Infrastructure:A Citizen's Guide 31 - v Wastewater treatment facilities as a whole received better grades than _ collection systems. Two primary reasons accounted for this: • Almost all wastewater treatment facilities are owned and operated by special districts that have a single purpose and dedicated funding for planning,design,construction, and operation and maintenance. • Treatment facilities have historically received greater attention than collection systems,as they are operated under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. These regulatory rules require treatment plants to meet certain effluent discharge levels and operating criteria;thus constant attention is given to meeting receiving water quality standards. Collection systems have not been permitted in a similar fashion, but this is changing with recent Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) rules. Public Policy Considerations: The evaluations of the survey of the wastewater systems in Orange County resulted in several recommended Policy Options that should be considered to help achieve this vision: Development of Dedicated Wastewater Infrastructure Funding To have a safe and reliable wastewater system that meets or exceeds all pertinent state and federal standards, there must be sufficient and dedicated revenues that are directed toward and dedicated to wastewatertreatment facilities and collection systems. Dedicated funding is critical so that those departments responsible for wastewater do not have to compete for general funds with other departments (like fire,police, and parks). 32 UC Irvine Civil&Environmental Engineering Affiliates v - Encourage San Diego RWQCB to update its Waste Discharge Requirement Regulations The consistently higher grades achieved by the wastewater treatment facilities are partly due to the fact that they are required to operate under the Environmental Protection Agency's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Wastewater collection systems have not historically been - permitted in a similar fashion. However, the Santa Ana RWQCB has recently initiated a new regulatory program for collections systems for its jurisdictional area in the northern part of the county. It is recommended that the San Diego RWQCB, that covers southern Orange County,update its waste discharge requirements for collection systems to ensure that they are more in line with the provisions of the Santa Ana RWQCB Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) Order. It is strongly recommend that the individual agencies communicate with their constituencies regarding how their system compares to the countywide grade. A C+ wastewater grade is an overall grade for all wastewater facilities within the county, Cities should consider forming "Citizen Infrastructure Advisory Committees" to assist city governments in developing policies and to maintain continued focus and attention on prioritizing infrastructure needs, levels of service, and allocation of funding. The cities of Fullerton and Huntington Beach have already begun such efforts. Encourage discussions within Orange County for innovative regional approaches to wastewater collection and treatment operations as financing and funding become more challenging in the future. Benefits include improved economies of scale, sharing the most advanced _ technologies and leveraging expertise. Renewing Orange County's Infrastructure.A Citizen's Guide 32 What You Can Do This guide offers solid proof that Orange County's public works challenges are enormous and complex, and will not solve themselves. It is now up to concerned citizens, like you, who understand the _ economic and environmental benefits of a healthy infrastructure, to push for action. You have seen the big picture of what's happening in Orange County. Here are some steps you can take to do your part in renewing Orange County's infrastructure: Learn all you can about the infrastructure problems in your area. Contact the California Department of Transportation, your city government and other sources to learn about plans for ensuring adequate roads,schools, parks and water systems. Regularly attend meetings held in your community about pressing infrastructure problems. When you see a problem, find out what level of government has jurisdiction over it. Sometimes various levels of government deal with different aspects of the same problem. Search the Internet. Agencies at all levels of government now have Web sites that list laws and regulations that pertain to your problem. Your mayor and state representatives probably have sites too, which may be your link to other government and advocacy group resources. If you know of an interest group that deals with the area you're interested in, visit its site. Ask business groups,such as your Chamber of Commerce,to examine the infrastructure in your community and its affect on local businesses, employment and the economy. 31 UC Irvine Civil&Ernironmental Engineenng Affiliates Express your concern to public officials such as your mayor and school board.Ask them how they plan to solve infrastructure problems. Urge - your neighbors to support your cause. Write letters to the editor of your newspaper,your state representatives and members of Congress, expressing your concerns and opinions on _ infrastructure. Volunteer for--or organize--citizen advisory committees dealing with your community's infrastructure issues. Support local, state and federal officials who understand and are committed to infrastructure renewal.Ask them to make infrastructure an election issue,just as they would education, crime or health care. Work to help pass local bond issues to repair,replace and expand your roads, parks, water systems and schools. Talk to civil engineers in your area about solutions and needs. Renewing Orange County's Infrastructure:A Citizen's Guide 35 OC FRIDAY, OCTOBER U. 2W2 63 Orang-ve County �- 1, Room foritimproT,eudien4 Infrastructure rake UC Irvine led a coalition,which Included engineers and public officials,to assess Orange CountyS infrastructure::nd"raise awareness that we are living on borrowed tinn: TM,coalition ar 9111 report card: and Warnings 6oun .e SOLID WASTE - -B PARKS, - C Proper planning Is needed to RECREATION, the American Society of Civil En- mentalists and academics then crl- decide the future location and ENVIRONMENT' Facilities:Countygetsa y use of landfills,as well as More state aid is C overall,with its(Tiles( gineers began putting out heat year. tiqued the findings , . processing plants and waste In the society's March report, the . The schools group found wide P recommended to maintain problems being schools nation's average infrastructure spread evidence of leaking roofs, transfer stations. P g services. grade eft r, those Involve County howbrokena pipes seismicsin is safety prob- "'--" and urban tUUOtT. (area better, those involved m the hems and even sinking buildings. WATER B TRANSPORTATION C project say, because most of the They gave a grade of D-plus. The county has 7.500 miles Another funding source By EVAN HALPER roads sewers, water systems and The county tared even worse on of water main pipes and 300 nM6alaff WRiIFg other public facilities are newer. when runoff, which received the like Measure M is needed Robert Bein,who was resident lowest de of all,a D. reportThe drinking water storage tanks to continue maintaining Schools in disrepair. Backed-up of the society when the national re- that are aging. reP P Y explained or the grade by citing the and improving the county' sewers.Polluted beaches. port card came out and is the CEO 1999ahoreline closures in Hunting- WASTEWATER _ _ I C+ transportation system. Is Orange County threatened of RBF Consulting in Irvine, or- ton Beach. It says massive an- _ with an infrastructure meltdown? ganized the Orange County project provements to the county's flood The county has 7,000 miles - A UC Irvine-led coalition of aca- with UCI Civil and Environmental control system are needed. But it of sewer pipes and 240 pump SCHOOL FACILITIES' D+ demics, development consultants, Engineering Affiliates. would take $1.2 billion worth of stations that need to be A majority of the county's public officials and others are "We did this to raise awareness such improvements to bring the maintained and upgraded to public school buildings are old, warning that the county may be G that we are living on borrowed urban runoff grade to an A. meet new federal regulations. outdated or overcrowded. the pioblems are left unresolved. time with am Infrastructure," he There was better news in the m- _.. The group spent six months study- said."Now is the time to put in the ear of water and solid waste,which �} URBAN RUNOFF ing the county'sinfrastructure, resources needed that will get our each received a B. But the report AVIATION , Commercial lair and D leading to Thursday's release of a infrastructure bark up to a level warned that the grade could easily air cargo demands need long- More revenue is needed to "report card"on it. that can support the quality of We slip if those systems aren't stored term solutions:The forecast for improve aging facilities,and Although the county's overall we are used to in Orange County." up and improved. annual passengers In the for new stormwater projects. inf ristmetme rates a C, the grade The report graded eight areas: The report says most of these is. 025:37 million, is dangerously close to an F for transportation, schools, water, sues can be solved only at the local county by 2 compared 02ith the million, million- schools and urban runoff. Grades aviation,parks,urban runoff,waste level. passenger cap now . John are also In significant danger of water and solid waste.The grades ,"Phis planes responsibility for pass sliding even in those areas where were given by committees of ex- infrastructure renewal and devei. Wayne Airport. the county is doingwell. parts from each field who collected opment squarely with individual The project is an offshoot of an and evaluated data. Review cosh- voters,"the report says. sour.:UC IN. Los masses times annual national report card that cgs of industry leaders, emdron- O.C. public works in need of some work Page I of I O.C. public works In need of some work First report card points to billions of dollars to meet growth needs. By DENNIS FOLEY The Orange County Register IRVINE Orange Countya roads,airports,parks,schools,water,waste and pollution systems earned a'C'grade overall from a group that spent five months examining the county's public-works systems. - Individual grades ranged from B's for water systems and trash-handling to a D for runoff and flood control. 'If your kid came home with this report card,you'd send them to their room;Supervisor Tadd Spitzer told the group gathered at the Beckman Center for the National Academies of the Sciences and Engineering."We know It's unacceptable.' The report card-the countys first-was modeled on one created by the American Society of Civil Engineers. Participants Included the UCI Civil and Environmental Engineering Affiliates and the Orange County Business Council. Organizers acknowledged that Improving the countys systems to handle existing demand and projected growth would coat billions of dollars-money that will be hard to come by. They plan to approach community groups and leaders and urge each city to prepare its own report card. 'Stakeholders must understand how much their quality of Ida Is in pedl;said Robert Bain,chief executive director of RBF Consulting in Irvine. Contact Foley at(714)285.2862 or dfoley®ocreglater.com. http://www2.ocmgister.con/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=6574&section=NE W S&year—:... 10/15/2002 County shows its age Page I of I County shows its age By DENNIS FOLEY me Orenga Caunry Relater IRME—Orange County Is showing signs of age,and the picture Isn't always a pretty one. "Much of Orange Countys Infrastructure is old,obsolete,decrepit and overloaded.'said Robert Bain,chief executive director of RBF Consulting in Irvine.'However,much of it Is in excellent shape.' The Orange County Report Card Issued Thursday sets a benchmark,proponents said. 'Now we know what the targets are; Bain said. The volunteer teams of civil engineers,planners and government experts considered three major areas in assessing public works,facilities and systems: Condition:What Is the existing or near-future condition, including planned improvements and funding commtiments? Capacity:Are facilities able to support the current population?How about in 10 years? Operations:Do existing systems meet regulatory requirements and Is sufficient money available for maintenance? The report card was modeled an a version created by the American Society of Civil Engineers when Bein was that national organization's president.Local participants also included the UCI Civil and Environmental Engineering Affiliates and the Orange County Business Council. 'We are at a serious crossroads;Supervisor Todd Spitzer said. Obstacles to Improvements abound. The county governments 1994 bankruptcy has left more than$900 million In debt and will hinder the county's ability to Improve public works for decades. The county gets back less property-tax money from the funds it sends the state than any other county and gets less state help for public schools than any large county. Electoral district reapportionment seems to protect a Democratic majony for the next decade,meaning historically Republican Orange County will continue to suffer in competition for resources from Sacramento. Advocates for infrastructure Improvements also are competing against more powerful Interests,such as public- safety advocates,for Iirnited dollars. Talking about infrastructure Isn't sexy and usually only comes to the public's attention where a catastrophe occurs,many say,leading Bain to urge a'crusade to educate the public.' http://www2.ocregister.corn/ocrweb/ocr/printArticle.do?id=6575&section=NEWS&year—:... 10/15/2002 T tdil the eight sub- FMtBIf1ES commdtees said about tbe.az- -. The min a],500 s, ear they studied Orange Ceunty in two-third under state- mis- D+ many ways seems diction,received high.grades. AVIATION like a paradise,but ^Tye overall grade is a re- not-when one looks at the Election of substantial pro- John Wayne Airport state of school buildings,said jected growth, but not a fi- managers were RonaI&Ben-Emily, the ar- nancial commitment" said praised for efficient chitea he ja#� commit- committee leader Les Card, operations at the county's on- tee.. ly commercial chief executive officer of ISA airport. Evaluators. found 40 por- Associates Inc. Fullerton Municipal. Air- table classrooms at one San Recommendations in port and Los-.Alamitos Army iClemente elementary school cluded seeking a continuous Airfield also were given.solid that had wiped out its play- funning source,such as Mea- marks• ground They also found sure M, which was approved The evaluators cited re- leakyroots,electrical systems for20 ears. onal studies that project an, . y P I inadequate to computers - - mml demand. of 37 million and rundown buildings. passengers from Orange . The report recommends IF/. County in 2025. considering- the tune- FLOOD CONTROL JWNs passenger level is quences.of continually de-. set at tt.4 Mil- Flood-control channels RELATED (erring maintenance, ]'on, under a -and urban runoff are re- STORY court-panc- SOUDWASTE lated, said committee leader Sonia Nasser,a county 44 PACE I tioned agree- meat that set- Orange County's three engineer. tied a lawsuit R landfills are estimated The same flood-control filed by airport neighbors. Y to have enough capacity channel that protects us and The committee's report to last until 2035, and the' allows a Disneyland in a did not comment on the re- county is earning some' floodplain also serves as a cent vote on Measure W, money taking other counties't contaminant -superhighway . , which substituted a `Great trash. Ifor urban nmoffto get to our Park" for a commercial air The collection, processing' beaches,'she sya: . jport at the former El Toro and disposal of trash rums e(fr - - Marine Base,,but mentioned cienUy,through use of private Urban, rmoff ds mmeatgl the "national dilemma'. over I haulers, recycling and)nod-1 water from homes,businessea meeting demand for mmmer i and public spaces that goes ern equipment and technol- into the storm drains. cial'air,and air-freight oiler- ogy,the report said. Only recently have coin ations. Finding places to locate.. munities more aggressively landfills will become an Issue; ,PARKS,RECREATION as development continues. raised the alum about runoff, Recommendations include she said , AND ENVIRONMENT Recommendations the county's effort Recommendations indkoe Orange County suffers to expand its landfill capacity regional cooperation, fmdmg from aging facilities to last until 2048. agreement on a way to pay for that are not sufficiently - system , improvements aqd. 1 maintained the report TRANSPORTATION educadouprogramsmgetpeo- said. _ pie to reduce activities olit Historically, parks have /� The average grade eval- produce rvno8;suck as water been considered leas essential ■`/ hums gave roads mg lawns and washing earn,. would have been much .;than other public services and - • morc'vulnerable to budget -worse if voters in. 1990 had cuts when.government belts again rejected a half-cent in- - 7 are tightened. crease in the IocaLaales tax. An example cited by Measure M has generated .•� Spitzer. The county will di- . more than $1 billion in 10 vert $4 million a year for 20 years,most of it pumped info years from its Harbors, highway improvements. Beaches and Parks budget to The critical .question re- pay off its$905 mfllfon bank- volves around the ability to ruptcy debt prevent gridlock as the county The committee recom- population increases by an es- mends pressuring the Legisla- domed 500,000 people in the j tore torecognize parks as part' two decades,the report said of the ssttaigte's infiastruchire Bus service and equipment and plotri&*dtto maintain was rated mostly reliable ll.l�l1 R*�Y I e count}+s currept B TG water quality anA water supply, received hl� marks,but the committee a- - pressed concern about the itt- ture. The northern and central .comty could lose their 61- orado River allotments, add - southern Orange County fills' no supplies:of its own and must pay to import all its wa- ter,the report said.That pre- sents potent®]'problems.of supply and eapeasa .Also,portions of the coiW-. ty's y,500 miles of water pipe: line wiB liegiu to fail as' it ages, so. main ensure and scheduled replacement ate critical,the report said. The group recommended continuing study of advanCga technology, such as a systgin for controlling landscape ii� gationand bliging key fact ities up to higher earthqu" standards. WA51EMAT6 C+ Beach closures caused by sewtt line breaks arel�A most visible signs of the fa&; we of the system, - aikt brought attention to probler6,q of decaying lines unable,je handle . Increased loa�'a clogged with grease and oiler• ruptured by tree roots. Paying or new treatmycn`C plants and:Bneswill be a cejF', timing challenge. Recommendations eluded forming citizen act; visory, committees, such as those begun in Fullerton arfd Huntington Beach- .IlseaYe 4 tle d report al eun.enqudNa/omepotw4 -w •Confnd Foley at(714)Z&rr� ' leykuepueraint ., & QF.fi/M-. L s �g E ^ > .trA LAO Am � I 4 r �?r Fdn:Sash l Aon Wallace To BkM ME n Nlo• 9/23/2002 Tme: 1105'.38 PM Page 2 of 2 p�2p c£rfXL C ALIF OR N IA BEB.IL0 AMERICA COALITION September 23, 2002 Dear CaIRAC Leader: The passage of ACA 11 and the sponsor's request that CaIRAC spearhead the campaign leading up to the March 2004 ballot measure provides an exciting opportunity to bring clarity and focus to CaIRAC activities over the coming 18 months. As a Coalition, we have defined our mission as building support for dedicated and consistent sources of funding for infrastructure. The infrastructure fund that passage of the Proposition to implement ACA 11 would establish is not a silver bullet. It funds only certain infrastructure categories. Even at 3% of the General Fund, the infrastructure fund by itself would not be sufficient to meet our current and future infrastructure investment needs. However, the passage of ACA 11 at the polls would provide the constitutionally protected, 'dedicated and consistent'infrastructure funds we have been working for these past two years (and many of you, much longer). If combined with the passage of the school bond measures and successful protection of existing sources of infrastructure funding, we will have made substantial progress in our quest to put in place the policies and mechanisms to reduce the infrastructure investment debt in California. We should consider this a great victory, with major implications for California and for Cali In light of ACA 11's passage, the many bond measures on the ballot over the next two years, as well as CaIRAC's likely receipt of substantial new resources this year from foundations and other contributors, I recommend that you as CaIRAC leaders take this time to collectively discuss and set forth a strategy for CaIRAC for the next 18m months. I propose that you participate in a facilitated strategic Mannino session that includes the members of the CaIRAC Board the Proarammatic Executive Committee (executive directors) and senior policy and communications staff from the PEC member organizations I will call each of you in the coming week to discuss the concept and to determine a date that results in the greatest level of participation. (I would recommend we try for a date In late October.) Feel free to contact me in the meantime at 916-442-S000. Regards, Sarah Layton Wallace Executive Vice President BokrRo rr£crErZ lAw GFFKESDf WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN& SMART APROFE4M0 CO mnm 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET,SUITE WW•ORANGE,CA 92104760 R(714)558-70W R FAX(714)8T5-7787 OIRECTOi (714)584-2805 DIRECT FAX (714)SBS-4 EMAIL: M.W®WSS- W.COM September 23, 2002 Managers and Legal Counsel Cities and Special Districts Per Attached Distribution List Re: Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R8-2002-0014 As you are aware, your entity has been determined to be and designated as a "Co-Pernittee" by Order No. R8-2002-0014 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Santa Ana Region ("RWQCB"), which established General Waste Discharge Requirements requiring cities and wastewater agencies within the jurisdiction of the RWQCB, to monitor and control sanitary sewer overflows (SSO's). One of the significant portions of that Order relates to a requirement for each agency to develop a "Fats, Oil and Grease" Source Control Program ("FOG Control Program") by December 20, 2004. The RWQCB has designated the Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD"), based largely on the experience and staffing capabilities of OCSD, to serve as a liaison to assist all of the Co-Permittees, in obtaining compliance with the Order. In furtherance of a county-wide need, the Orange County Board of Supervisors, by separate action, has agreed to join with OCSD in conducting a county-wide comprehensive study to evaluate FOG control technologies, management practices and programs, so as to establish the requirements enabling each city or special district to adopt an Ordinance establishing its own FOG Control Program. By letter dated May 14, 2004 to all cities in Orange County, Chair of the Board of Supervisors, Cynthia P. Coed has urged your agency to join in a cooperative program, as a means of considerable-cost-saving method, in developing a standardized program on a county-wide basis. In furtherance of that, this office, as General Counsel to OCSD, has prepared an Agreement which we are requesting that you approve and execute. In summary, the Agreement calls for your agency to contribute the sum of$3,000.00 towards the costs of developing the county-wide program that could be utilized by your agency. The County and OCSD are each contributing the sum of $90,000.00 towards a contract with Environmental Engineering and Contracting, Inc. of Santa Ana. The only other obligation, on the part of your agency, would be to cooperate by providing information concerning your agency to the Contractor, upon request. This information would relate to such things as, numbers of restaurants; regulations, such as ordinances- or TFRRYCANDRUSBSIFPFQ:TJ 1.BEATON B XLOSBOBAX•C�ABY •Rw&GVMH H•TAMISCR05BY JAMFS W.00MCH•W G.FARRBIDJDN R xBFPH W.RMBATH B PJ J W.HEIMS•BRADJFYRMIOBI•D0001A9CMlLLAND LOISEJFSFPEY•ROBERTAAKMU.9•MAGDXUNAL -WL1N7R RUEMADSI(EY•KWLT.NOUYPN•THOMASF.MXON BARBARARAJUF BJ�S RflTFRFRR OMAR SAM)OVAL•JOHHRSHAW BOREOORYESBIO -KFNNARDRSMART.JR DA L SPRADIW 0 IAWAA UtIDFRWOOD B TJKIMASL WOODRW Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R8-2002-0014 September 23, 2002 Page 2 resolutions presently enforced in your jurisdiction; and general background data so as to enable the Contractor to develop this program. In turn, when the program study is completed, you will receive a copy of the full report, which should enable you, without any significant additional effort, to adopt a required Ordinance establishing your own agency-wide FOG Control Program, as ordered by the RWQCB. We have developed this Agreement in consultation with county representatives and representatives of cities with the intent to keep the Agreement as simplified as possible. We do think it is Imperative that we do have a standardized agreement, and therefore, in the absence of receiving some major points of objection, it is our intent that all agencies execute the submitted Agreement and forward the contribution check of $3,000.00 directly to and payable to the Orange County Sanitation District, P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, California 92728, attention: Addana Renescu, Technical Services Department. If you have any particular questions concerning the program or the Agreement we would appreciate your sending us a memo, by mail or e-mail, and we would be happy to respond as soon as possible. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A Pro ssional Corporation ZYI�G.IP r G HOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL - OCSD TLW:jlo Enclosures cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. R. Ghirelli Ms. A. Renescu Mr. William Mahoney Mr. Mike Wellborn %15776M Orange County Sanitation District City of Anaheim P.O.Box 8127 201 S.Anaheim Blvd.,Ste.601, Fountain Valley,CA 92728 Anaheim,CA 92805 Mr, Mark Kawamoto Mr.James Ruth—City Manager Ms.Adriana Renescu Mr.Jack L.White—City Attorney Mr.Thomas L.Woodruff—General Counsel City of Orange Garden Grove Sanitary District P.O. Box 449 11222 Acacia Parkway Orange,CA 92666 Garden Grove,CA 92840 Mr.David Rudat—City Manager Mr.George Tindall—City Manager Mr.David A.DeBeny—City Attorney Mr.John R.Shaw—City Attorney City of Los Alamitos County of Orange 3191 Katella Avenue 10 Civic Center Plaza,Third Floor Los Alamitos,CA 90720 Santa Ana,CA 92701 Mr.Robert C.Dominguez—City Manager Mr. Mike Wellborn—Manager Mr.Bryan C.LeRoy—Interim City Attorney Mr.Ben DeMeo—County Counsel Irvine Ranch Water District City of Yorba Linda P.O.Box 57000 4845 Casa Loma Avenue Irvine,CA 92718 Yorba Linda,CA 92885 Mr.Paul Jones—General Manager Mr.Terrence Belanger—City Manager Ms.Joan Amason—General Counsel Mr.Leonard A.Hempel—Oty Attorney Midway City Sanitary District City of La Habra 14451 Cedarwood Avenue P.O. Box 337 Westminster,CA 926835318 Le Habra,CA 90633-0337 Mr. Ron M.Briles—General Manager Mr.Thomas G.Mauk—City Manager Mr.Omar Sandoval—General Counsel Mr.Richard D.Jones—City Attorney Naval Weapons Station El Toro Water District Code 0215,B26 P.O.Box 4000 800 Seal Beach Blvd., Laguna Hills,CA 92654 Seal Beach,CA 90740-5000 Mr.Robert R.HIII—General Manager Mr. Gilher J.Gnan90—General Counsel City of Fullerton City of Santa Ana 303 W.Commonwealth Ave. 20 Civic Center Plaza,P.O.Box 1988 Fullerton,CA 92832 Santa Ana,CA 92702 Mr.Jim Armstrong—City Manager Mr. David Ream—City Manager - Mr.Richard D.Jones—City Attorney Mr.Joseph Fletcher—City Attorney City of La Palma City of Placentia Public Works Department 401 E.Chapman Avenue, 7822 Walker Street, Placenlia,CA 92670 La Palma,CA 90623 Mr. Robert D'Amato—City Manager Mr. Leonard Wood—City Manager Mr.Thomas F.Nixon—City Attorney Mr.Joel D.Kuperberg—City Attorney City of Buena Park City of Stanton - Department of Public Works 7800 Karelia Avenue 6650 Beach Blvd., P.O.Box 5009 Stanton,CA 90680 Buena Park,CA 90622-5009 Mr.Terry S.Matz—Gty Manager Mr.Greg Beaubien—City Manager Mr.Gregory G. Diaz—City Attorney Mr.James L.Markman—City Attorney City of Fountain Valley City of Brea 10200 Slater Ave., One Civic Center Circle Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Brea,CA 92821-5732 Mr.Ray Kromer—City Manager Mr.Tim O'Donnell—City Manager Mr.Alan R. Bums—City Attorney Mr.James L.Markman—City Attorney City of Huntington Beach City of Newport Beach P.O.Box 190 P.O. Box1768 Huntington Beach,CA 92683 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Mr.Ray Silver—City Manager Mr. Homer Bludau—City Manager Ms.Gail C.Hutton—City Attorney Mr. Robert Burnham—City Attorney City of Villa Park Sunset Beach Sanitary District 17855 Santiago Boulevard P.O.Box 1185 Villa Park,CA 928614105 Sunset Beach,CA 90742-1184 Mr.Fred Maley—City Manager Mr. Ray Lewis-Engineer Mr.Leonard A.Hempel—City Attorney Mr.B.Richard Marsh Yorba Linda Water District Costa Mesa Sanitary District P.O.Box 309 P.O.Box 1200 Yorba Linda,CA 92686 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 Mr.William J.Robertson—General Manager Mr. Robin B.Hamers—Manager/Engineer Mr.Arthur G.Kidman—General Counsel Mr.Alan R.Bums—General Counsel City of Cypress City of Seal Beach P.O.Box 609 211 80 Street Cypress,CA 90630 Seal Beach,CA 9074M305 Ms.Pat Importune—City Manager Mr.John Bahorski—City Manager Mr.William W.Wynder—City Attorney Mr.Quinn M.Borrow—City Attorney Air Force Reserve Center Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Area Sewer District Department of Public Works,Bldg.35 3243 Karelia Avenue 4230 Constitution Avenue Los Alamitos,CA 90720 Los Alamitos,CA 90720 Ms.Ann Crefton—General Manager Sewer System Manager Mr. Omar Sandoval—General Counsel Joint Forces Training Base Marine Corps Air Station Building 35 c/o City of Tustin 4230 Constitution Avenue 300 Centennial Way Los Alamitos,CA 90720 Tustin,CA 92780-3715 Mr.William A.Huston—City Manager Ms. Lois E.Jeffrey—City Attomey For Immediate Release: October 2, 2002 contact: mark merchant, U.S. EPA, (415) 947-4297 The move requires that the city end sewage spills SAN FRANCISCO The U.S . Environmental Protection Agency announced today that it has formally ordered the city of Laguna Beach to create a plan that will stop sewer spills in the city. Laguna Beach operates a 95-mile network of sewer pipes and pump stations that collect sewage from throughout the city. The federal Clean water Act prohibits discharging raw sewage to "navigable waterways" such as the Pacific ocean . Between July 1, 1997 and June 30, 2002, Laguna Beach reported 64 sewage spills from its sewer system, 20 of which were into local waterways. The city reported 16 spills in calendar year 2000; 16 spills in calendar year 2001; and 6 spills between January 1 and June 30, 2002. The last spill to reach a waterway was in December 2001. The EPA and the city have determined that the main cause of sewer spills in Laguna Beach are roots in the system. This accounts for more than 50 percent of the sewer spills. many of the city's sewer pipes are old and deteriorated making them prone to invasion by roots. Portions of the city' s sewer system date back to the 1930. In 2001, the city of Laguna Beach had the second worst record of sewer spills of 30 communities surveyed in depth by the EPA. In march 2002 , the city identified 17 miles of sewer lines in need of replacement or rehabilitation. In addition, many of the city's 26 sewage pump stations are also in need of rehabilitation. "City officials are aware of the Problem and have already been taking steps to solve it said Wayne Nastri , re Tonal administrator of the EPA's Pacfic Southwest office. "They have made a bold commitment to ending sewage discharges , and we applaude them for all they've done and continue to do. our action simply commits the citX to carryout their planned sewer system improvements. ' In march , the city council adopted the "City of Laguna Beach sewer System strategic Plan" to reduce sewage spills and improve the performance of its collection system. The plan includes an S18.9 million plan to repair, rehabilitate, replace and upgrade sewer pipes and pump stations over the next decade. In May, the city completed 45 high priority sewer pipe repairs at a cost of $250,000. To fund sewer improvements , the city council in June approved two 10 percent increases in sewer fees. In August, the city council adopted a grease control ordinance requiring grease interceptors at new restaurants, banning restaurant food grinders, and mandating "best kitchen management practices . " The EPA, at the behest of congress, gave the city $873,000 in August for sewer system improvement, a figure the city matched, bringing the total for repair and rehabilitation to $1.6 million. This figure is included in the $18.9 million strategic plan. with this order, the city must commit to a sewage Spill Reduction Action Plan by March 2003 that includes a sewer system cleaning and root control program; a sewer pipe inspection and condition assessment; a sewer repair, rehabilitation and replacement schedule; and a pump station and force main maintenance repair and upgrade plan. The EPA expects the city to submit a plan similar to the plan approved by city council earlier this year. The order also requires the city to implement their recentlyy adopted restaurant grease control ordinance which will be evaluated by the EPA after its first full year . For more information about sewer spills and the envrironment in Laguna Beach, visit these web sites: httD://www.laguna-beach .ca.us/laaenv.htm ttb,//www.e a.aov/ebtpaaes/water. html http:/4www.ena.gov/-OWOW/oceans/Xotoltopten .html htto: //www.vearofcleanwater.ora/ Oct 09 2002 8: 57AM 01 t-01-R 01:41, Free-Canarassraaan laratb Smhat t02.221-5151 7-371 P.005/007 F-792 ' CongreJrg of the anote® *taleg Wifi5bulgoon.MC 20515 October 8,2002 The Honorable Bill Young Chairman Committee on Appropriations H218 Capitol Building Washington,DC 205 2 5 Dear Cbainnmr Young: We respectfully request that you include report language in the FY'03 VA-HUD _ Appropriations bill to facilitate the Orange County Sanitation District's(OCSD)efforts to improve the ocean environment in Southern California. The OCSD provides wastewater treatment services to more than 2.5 million of our constituents. On July 19,2002,the District's Board of Directors voted to move the OCSD to secondary treatment compliance. This vote included a decision not to renew the.District's current Clean Water Act NPDES permit that includes a 301(h)waiver permitting the discharge of treated wastewaters at less than the secondary treatment standard. This action was unprecedemed and ibis bold decision will lead the way to ensure that coastal waters receive the highest level of protection throughout California. Unfortunately, the Clean Water Act never envisioned that a Publicly Owned Treatment Works permitted with a 301(h)waiver would decline to pursue an extended waiver and instead adopt a decision to meet the full secondary treatment standard threshold. As a result,the OCSD finds themselves in the bureaucratic Catch-22 situation of being in noncompliance with the Clear Water Act when the existing 301(h)permit expires in June 2003, lr order to avoid the District's "Good Sarmatitar" effort triggering lawsuits for noncompliance with the Clean Water Act when its existing permit expires,the District is working with the EPA, State officials, and the regional environmental community to develop an acceptable permit and compliance schedule. The State of California has enacted a specific amendment to its clean water law to ensure that the District can proceed at the state level within in the threat of frivolous litigation or administrative penalties attributable to the unusual situation of not renewing its current permit waiver, We have enclosed specific language that will ensure the timely upgrade of the District's treatment rapacity and protect the interests of our community. The language complements the state action and is consistent with the District's ongoing discussions with the U.S.EPA regarding the renewal of its NPDES permit to achieve the secondary treatment standard. It emphasizes the importance of providing the District with the opportunity to work with the EPA on a compliance schedule that would allow for the orderly planting, design,and construction of facilities to meet this standard. the proposed language only seeks to endorse the approach that the District is pursuing. Upon agreement with the EPA, The District would be able to implement a plan of action without the threat of litigation for noncompliance when its current permit expires. ...mow.mnm,wa Oct 09 2002 8: 57AM Oc1-00-02 01:62pm From-Consroiramen Loretto Sanchez 202-225-5051 T-376 P 000007 F-732 The need for report language is conical to the orderly implementation of a plan to improve our coastal waters and the economic health of our communities. If you or your staff have any questions,please don't hesitate to contact us or Kristen Cummings with Representative Sanchez. Muhammad Hutasuhut with Representative Cox, or Aaron Lewis with Representative Rohrabacher. Sinccrcly, Lonna Sanchez, M.C. Christopher Cox,M.C. Dane Rohrabacher,M.C. Oct 09 2002 9:S?RM P-s 0.1-08-02 61:42PA From-Conarsnecoan Loretta $anchor M-221-5150 T-820 P.DITADT F-T32 - REPORT LANGUAGE FOR ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION D2S1'R1CI' The Comminee is awme of the recent decisfmh by the Board of Diremms of the Orange Cmouy Sanitation Dist,iet(OCSD)in Orange County,California to nave as eapodidoosly n�r amicable to full smostdary meaonant and to withdraw from the Class Water Am Sm.301(h)waiverpregnon. The Cotanivee is alzo aware the the Clean Water Au has no provision for loch so evehivalhty. Tlrtrcfam.the Conmdnee spangly urges The Envimisommal Prolecliou Agency(EPA)and the Sute ofCalifmnin in work w0i,OCSD _ to protect OCSD from lawsuit and administrative penalties while it pursues,the difficult ehalloiga of achieving the secondary rearm tit standard wdm the terns and conditions of the Clean"later Act and the .niphnim schedule in the npplirable NPDES permit I icd by EPA and the Slate. WIFORNIA ASSOCIATION d SANITATION AGENCIES 925 L Street- Suite 1400 Sacramento.CA 95814 TEL: (916)446-0388—FAX(916)448-4808 p ° October 1,2002 TO: CASA MEMBER AGENCIES (Please share with your Board Members) CASA ASSOCIATES CASA ATTORNEYS FROM: Mike Dillon,Executive Director Bobbi Larson,Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY I. LEGISLATURE SENDS HUNDREDS OF BILLS TO GOVERNOR IN FINAL HOURS OF SESSION The California State Legislature adjourned for the year at a few hours past midnight on Saturday, August 31°. In the final hours of the session,the Assembly Democrats and Republicans worked aggressively to cobble together a budget package that both sides could agree to. In the final negotiations,the$3.7 billion needed to bring the Budget in balance was achieved by$2 billion in "revenue enhancements,"a$700 million shift in Proposition 98 school funding from this year's Budget into the 2003-04 year,$750 million in savings from a 5%across-the-board cut in state operations,$300 million savings by abolishing positions in state departments,agencies and boards- The Senate,which had already passed its version of the Budget on Jmte 30'h,agreed to the changes and the compromise- The Governor signed the Budget several days later. The end of the legislative session is always chaotic. This session was as bad,or perhaps worse, than any other. Bills were being"gutted and amended"right up to the final hours before adjournment. "Gut and amend"is a term used to designate those bills,that despite riles requiring that any amendments be germane,are amended at the last minute to become totally" different bills. For example,in one case,a Senate measure relating to overtime requirements for the ski industry was totally"gutted"and replaced with amendments relating to the United Farm Workers issue. This action was apparently done for convenience,as the provisions in the Senate bill relating to the ski industry were subsequently amended into an Assembly bill that had previously related to tobacco products. Go figure! Hundreds of bills were sent to the Governor in the final days and hours of the Session. The Governor had until midnight last night to sign or veto the many bills that have been on his desk CASA, like many other organizations,won a few and lost a few. While the Govemor signed our two CASA-sponsored bills,AB 2351-Canciau ills and SB 1599-Poochigian,he vetoed AB 1986-Dia7,sponsored by ACWA, and actively supported by CASA. Following are a number of the key bills CASA was involved with this session and the final legislative summary. 1 tl. GOVERNOR SIGNS CASA-SPONSORED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTY REFORM BILL Governor Davis has signed into law AB 2351-Canciamilla,the mandatory minimum penalty (M p)reform legislation co-sponsored by CASA and the League of California Cities. AB 2351 (Chapter No. 995, Statutes of 2002)will exempt from mandatory penalties,violations resulting from treatment process start-up,provided that the discharger meets certain conditions set forth in the law. The bill also allows multiple violations due to single operational upsets of biological _ treatment processes to be counted as a single violation for a period up to 30 days. Under AB 2351,a portion of penalty monies may be used for supplemental environmental projects(SEPs) rather than deposited in the Cleanup and Abatement Account(CAA),subject to the concurrence of the discharger. Environmental groups that had originally opposed earlier versions of the bill removed thew opposition based on several sea of amendments,which narrowed the scope of the penalty relief. The bill did not receive a"No"vote in either house of the Legislature. M. CASA-SPONSORED BILL REGARDING PERMIT"STAYS"BECOMES LAW SB I599-Poochigian,which world require the State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB) to act on requests for stays associated with discharge permit appeals within 60 days,was signed into law on August 30,2002. (Chapter 324,Statutes of 2002.) Under current law,there is no timeframe within which the SWRCB must act on stay requests. As a result,POT Ws have been forced to go to superior court to obtain a stay of challenged permit limits in order to protect against penalties for violations. SB 1599 would requite the SWRCB to gram or deny a request for a say of waste discharge requirements within 60 days of accepting the petition for review. The bill would also make it clear that either the SWRCB or a superior cam may grant a say retroactive to the effective date of the permit. IV. GOVERNOR VETOES PERS RETIREMENTS BENEFITS FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS Other the weekend,the Governor vetoed AB 1996 by Assembly Member Manny Diaz,which would have reinstated optional membership rights to participate in the California Public Employees' Retirement System(CALPERS)to elected and appointed officials. Existing law contains an exclusion which prohibits elected or appointed officials of a school district, community college district,or of a contracting agency,i.e.special districts,who save on public commissions,boards,etc.,from participating in CALPERS if they were frost elected or appointed after July 1, 1994. Co-sponsored by ACWA and Santa Clam Water District,and actively supported by CASA and the American Federation of State,County and Municipal Employers. Despite strong bipartisan support in the Legislature,the Governor vetoed the measure. In his veto message,the Governor sated, "This bill would eliminate the prohibition of local agency elective or appointive officials front obtaining retirement coverage under the California Public Employees'Retirement System. 1 believe this should be at the discretion of each local agency and not mandated. I would be willing to sign a bill once there has been either a vote of the people or the adoption of an appropriate resolution at a duly noticed public meeting by the governing body." 2 X. ACA 11-RICE MAN—"PAY-AS-YOU-GO"INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING ACA 11,by Republican Assemblyman Dr.Keith Richman,would establish the California Twenty-First Century In&ashucnae Investment Fund in the State Treasury. Beginning in the 2006.07 fiscal year,the measure would cause a specified percentage of revenues to be transferred from the General Fund to the Infiastucture Fund four times during the fiscal year. Initially,a sum equal to 1%of the total General Fund revenues,as estimated by the Department of Finance,for purposes of the Budget Act for that fiscal year,would be deposited into the Fund, increasing by a small amount annually until a sum equal to 3%of the total General Fund revenues is set aside during the 2013-14 fiscal year. The Governor's Department of Finance would prepare an annual plan to expend these funds,unless the Governor directs another state agency to carry out this responsibility. 50%of the Rinds in the Infrastructure Fund would be allocated by the Legislature for capital outlay purposes for acquisition,construction, rehabluation,modemGation,or renovation of state-owned infrastructure. 50%would be for the same purposes,but for local government infiastructue,excluding school districts and community colleges. In years where state revenues fall below certain assumption,the transfers would be suspended for that fiscal year. The 50%for acquisition,construction,rehabilitation, modernization,or renovation of in&astuchae for local government,includes but is riot limited to streets,roads,highways,transportation,water,parks,and open space that a owned,or is to be acquired by cities,counties,and special districts. Normally,ACA 11 would not have made it to the Governor's desk,because of its placing new limitations on state General Fund revenues. However,Assemblyman Richman was able to get ACA 11 tied into the final budget negotiations,and he ultimately provided one of the four necessary Republican votes for the Budget. ACA I must still be approved by the voters. XI. FINAL BILI.STATUS REPORT Attached is an updated bill status report for your inkrination. The complete summary of bills is posted to the CASA website at the beginning of each month - www.casaweb.ore- under "Committees"and"State Legis.Cormnitee." You may also log onto www.leeinfo.ca.eov, under"Bill hdonnation'for detail on each bill. 5 1. IMPORTANT BILLS State Bill No. /Author Title Summary Status CA AB 639 Coastal Waters: This bill would require the SWRCB board, in consultation with Chaptered: Nakano Contamination specified entities and, on/or before July 1, 2003, to develop Oct. 4, 2001 reliable, rapid, and affordable diagnostic tests for measuring indicators of contamination by pathogens in coastal waters. The bill would require the board to prepare and submit to the Legislature a progress report on or before July 1, 2003. The bill would require the board to carry out these duties only to the extent that funds are made available for these purposes. CA AB 954 California Water This bill would enact the California Water Supply Reliability and Dead Kelley Supply Protection Bond Act of 2002, which, if adopted, would authorize, Reliability and for purposes of financing a water protection and storage program, Protection Bond the issuance, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, Act of 2002 of bonds in an unspecified amount. CA AB 1438 Public This bill would require the Department of Health Services, by no Dead Florez Freshwater later than March 1, 2003, to convene a public advisory group, with Bathing Areas: specified membership, to advise the department on the Recreational development of minimum standards for sanitation of high-use or Use: Sanitation priority freshwater bathing areas, as defined. The bill would require the department, on or before December 31, 2005, to establish minimum sanitation standards for the recreational use of the public freshwater bathing areas. CA AB 2365 Water Recycling This bill would enact the Water Recycling and Dual Plumbing Dead Goldberg and Dual Bond Act of 2002 which, if adopted, would authorize, for purposes Plumbing Bond of financing a water recycling and dual plumbing infrastructure Act of 2002 program, the issuance, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, of bonds in the amount of $575,900,000. CA AB 2698 Infrastructure This bill would transfer specified percentages of revenues from the Dead Cox Financing General Fund to the Infrastructure Fund commencing in the first fiscal year, beginning with the 2004-05 fiscal year, in which General Fund expenditures exceed the level of General Fund expenditures in the 2001-02 fiscal year. CA SB 672 California Water This bill would require the Department of Water Resources to Chaptered: Machado Plan: Urban include in the California Water Plan a report on the development Sept. 20, 2001 Water of regional and local water projects within each hydrologic region Management of the state to improve water supplies to meet municipal, Plans agricultural, and environmental water needs and minimize the need to import water from other hydrologic regions. CA SB 710 Surface Water This bill would require the SWRCB board to provide a report to the Dead Alpert Quality advisory group and the public that summarizes the contents of Monitoring reports prepared by regional water quality control boards regarding their implementation of surface water quality monitoring programs. CA SB 816 Waste This bill would authorize a regional board to issue a cleanup and Dead Johnson Discharges: abatement order with regard to the discharge of waste that Regulatory constitutes a nonpoint source discharge but, except as otherwise Action specified would prohibit the regional board from issuing a cease and desist order with regard to that discharge. CA SB 975 California This bill would require any of those public works financed through Chaptered: Alarcon Infrastructure the use of industrial development bonds under the California Oct. 14, 2001 and Economic Industrial Development Financing Act to comply with those laws Development relating to payment of prevailing wages. Bank CA SB 1009 Agriculture This bill would create the Dairy Environmental Working Group in Dead Costa the De artment of Food and Agriculture. CA SB 1107 Water Quality: This bill would make a statement of legislative intent to enact a Dead Alarcon Total Maximum pilot program to assist local governments to comply with Daily Loads requirements relating to total maximum daily loads. CA SB 1342 Waste This bill would require the SWRCB board and the regional boards Dead Morrow Discharge to prescribe and enforce waste discharge requirements for Requirements: municipal separate storm sewer systems in conformance with the Municipal "maximum extent practicable" standard set forth in the Clean Separate Storm Water Act. Sewer Systems Federal Bill No./Author Title Summary Status US HR 175 Enumerated To require Congress to specify the source of authority 2/12/2001 - Referred to Shadegg Powers Act under the United States Constitution for the enactment House subcommittee. of laws, and for other purposes. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution. US HR 325 Fishable Waters To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 2/15/2001 - House Tanner Act of 2001 establish a program for fisheries habitat protection, committee/subcommittee restoration, and enhancement, and for other purposes. actions. Status: Executive Comment Requested from Interior. US HR 668 Clean Water To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 2/15/2001 - Referred to Kelly Infrastructure authorize appropriations for State water pollution House subcommittee. Financing Act of control revolving funds, and for other purposes. Status: Referred to the 2001 Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment. US HR 1985 Western Water To authorize funding through the Secretary of the 9/13/2001 - House Calvert Enhancement Interior for the implementation of a comprehensive committee/subcommittee Security Act program in California to achieve increased water yield actions. Status: and environmental benefits, as well as improved water Forwarded by system reliability, water quality, water use efficiency, Subcommittee to Full watershed management, water transfers, and levee Committee (Amended) by protection. Voice Vote. US HR 3178 Water To authorize the Environmental Protection Agency to 12/19/2001 - Senate Boehlert Infrastructure provide funding to support research and development preparation for floor. Security and projects for the security of water infrastructure. Status: Placed on Research Senate Legislative Development Calendar under General Act Orders. Calendar No. 299. US HR 3389 National Sea To reauthorize the National Sea Grant College 6/27/2002 - Senate Gilchrest Grant College Program Act, and for other purposes. preparation for floor. Program Act Status: Read twice. Amendments of Placed on Senate 2002 Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 463. US HR 3930 Water Quality To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 4/17/2002 - House Duncan Financing Act of authorize appropriations for State water pollution committee/subcommittee 2002 control revolving funds, and for other purposes. actions. Status: Ordered to be Reported Amended US S 1608 To establish a To establish a program to provide grants to drinking 1/23/2002 - House Smith program to water and wastewater facilities to meet immediate preparation for floor. provide grants security needs. Status: Held at the desk. to drinking water and wastewater facilities to meet immediate security needs US S 1961 Water To improve the financial and environmental 7/29/2002 - Senate Graham Investment Act sustainability of the water programs of the United preparation for floor. of 2002 States. Status: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 527. 2. CRITICAL BILLS State BIII No./Author Title Summary Status CA AB 15 Land Use: [This bill is no longer of interest as it was amended to an unrelated Chaptered: Harman Business issue.] Sept. 29, 2002 License (Formerly AB 15 Stormwater Discharges) CA AB 498 Environmentally This bill would provide that the Department of General Services, in Chaptered: Chan Preferable consultation with the California Environmental Protection Agency, Sept. 16, 2002 Purchasing members of the public, industry, and public health and environmental organizations, shall provide state agencies with information and assistance regarding environmentally preferable purchasing, as provided. CA AB 1192 Water.Quality This bill would enact the Water Quality and Watershed Protection Dead Pavley and Watershed Act of 2002 which, if adopted, would authorize, for purposes of Protection Act of financing a water quality and watershed protection program, the 2002 issuance, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, of bonds in the amount of$_. CA AB 1365 Environmental This bill would designate any public agency engaged in the Dead Ashburn Quality: Sewage treatment or generation of sewage sludge as the lead agency for Sludge purposes of CEQA for the transportation, disposal, use, land application, or storage of that sewage sludge within or outside its boundaries. CA AB 1892 Orange County This bill would authorize the Orange County Sanitation Chaptered: Harman Sanitation District to acquire, construct, operate, maintain, and furnish June 30, 2002 District facilities for the diversion of urban runoff from drainage courses within the district, the treatment of the urban runoff, the return of the water to the drainage courses, or the beneficial use of the water. Districtsponsored le isiation. CA AB 1969 Water Quality: This bill would permit the regional board to find that the Chaptered: Maddox Civil Liability discharger Is not able to consistently comply with one or Sept. 28, (Formerly AB more of the effluent limitations established in the waste 2002 1969 Waste discharge requirements applicable to the waste discharge, if Discharge the discharger is a publicly owned treatment works located In Requirements: Orange County that is unable to meet effluent limitations for Orange County biological oxygen demand, suspended solids, or both, Sanitation because the publicly owned treatment works was previously District ) operating under modified secondary treatment requirements, voted on July 17, 2002, to not apply for a renewal of the modified secondary treatment requirements, and is in the process of upgrading its treatment facilities to meet the secondary treatment standards. This bill would waive the requirement to impose minimum mandatory penalties for as long as necessary to upgrade the facilities until January 1, 2013. District Sponsored Legislation.] CA AB 2351 Water Quality: This bill would provide relief from minimum mandatory penalties Chaptered: Canciamilla Civil Liability under the following exceptions: Process startup for up to 60 days Sept. 27, 2002 when specified conditions are met and a single operational upset would qualify for up to 30 days. Additionally, this bill would allow for more penalty monies to go towards supplemental environmental pro ects. CA ABXI 52 Electricity: This bill would amend the Public Utilities Act to require the Dead Campbell Rotating commission, within 30 days of the effective date of the bill, to Electrical require an electrical corporation that implements a rotating Service electrical service outage to notify the large users, as defined, Outages within the service area of the electrical corporation that are to be affected within 4 minutes from the time the electrical corporation is notified by the Independent System Operator of the necessity of implementing an electrical service outage, except asspecified. CA SB 196 Parks Coastal This bill would enact the California Resources Legacy Bond Act of Dead Chesbro Protection, Land 2002, which, if adopted, would authorize, for the purpose of Conservation, financing a program for the acquisition, development, restoration, Air Pollution, protection, rehabilitation, stabilization, reconstruction, and Historic preservation, and interpretation of park, coastal protection, Preservation: agricultural land preservation, air pollution prevention, and Bond Act. historical resources, as specified, the issuance, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, of bonds in the amount of $2,998,000,000. CA SB 633 Hazardous and This bill would require any mercury-containing vehicle light switch, Chaptered: Sher Solid Waste: as defined, that is removed from a vehicle to be subject to the Oct. 10, 2001 Mercury regulations adopted by the Department of Toxic Substances Control regarding the management of universal waste and other applicable regulations, and would require the department to take specified actions with regard to the safe removal and disposal of those switches. CA SB 647 Recycled Water. This bill would require the State Department of Health Services to Dead Ackerman make a finding that the proposed recharge into the receiving aquifer, that is a source of domestic water supply, is protective of the public health and will maintain or enhance overall water quality prior to allowing the recycled water to be injected into the stratum. Federal BIII No./Author Title Summary Status US HR 685 California To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and 2/23/2001 - House Miller Reclaimed Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to authorize committee/subcommittee Water Act for certain projects in California for the use or reuse of actions. Status: the 21"Century reclaimed water and for the design and construction of Executive Comment demonstration and permanent facilities for that Requested from Interior. ur ose, and for other purposes. US HR 3792 Clean Water To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 2/27/2002 - Referred to Kelly Infrastructure authorize appropriations for State water pollution House subcommittee. and Security control revolving funds, and for other purposes. Status: Referred to the Improvement Subcommittee on Water Act of 2002 Resources and Environment. US S 351 Mercury To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to reduce the 9/23/2002 - Referred to Collins Reduction and quantity of mercury in the environment by limiting use House subcommittee. Disposal Act of of mercury fever thermometers and improving Status: Referred to the 2001 collection, recycling, and disposal of mercury, and for Subcommittee on other purposes. Environment and Hazardous Materials. 3. CASA BILLS State Bill No. /Author Title Summary Status AB 363 Attorneys This bill would authorize an attorney who learns of improper Vetoed Steinberg governmental activity, as defined, in the course of representing a governmental organization to urge reconsideration of the matter and to refer it to a higher authority in the organization. This bill would also authorize the attorney in specified circumstances to refer the matter to law enforcement or to another governmental agency and would exempt the attorney from disciplinary action for making a referral of the matter. AB 857 Infrastructure This bill would clarify the information that is required to be included Chaptered: Wiggins Planning: in a proposal for funding state infrastructure identified in the 5-year Sept. 28, 2002 Priorities and plan. Funding AB 1986 Public This bill would eliminate that membership exclusion and thereby Dead Diaz Employees' authorize those elective or appointive officers of a contracting Retirement: agency to elect to become members of the system and to receive Elected or service credit for their prior excluded service, provided they meet Appointed specified conditions. By expanding the class of persons who may Officers make contributions to a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. AB 2938 Waste This bill would require each person for whom waste discharge Dead Simitian Discharge requirements have been prescribed, including individuals Requirements: classified as a co-permittee on a stormwater permit and owners of Fees confined animal feeding or holding operations, to submit an annual fee that is not more than $35,000 in accordance with a fee schedule, which the state board would be required to adopt. SB 934 False Claims This bill would additionally specify that when a civil action includes Dead Margett Actions: a claim under these provisions and a breach of contract claim Restrictions against the state or any political subdivision, the claim under these provisions shall be severed from the breach of contract action and tried after the breach of contract action but before the same trier of fact, unless the court orders it to be tried before a different trier of fact. JC:DC:wh G9wp.dtaNe\62MENERAL DATA=UC_DC_LegISIatiVe WrePup2002BRDLTR.doc ATTACHMENTS 1. CASA Legislative Summary. California Association of Sanitation Agencies. 1 October 2002. 2. CASA Year-End Bill Status-2001-2002 Legislative Session. California Association of Sanitation Agencies. 1 October 2002. m7a ©o ©ram MIM mm om mr, mmt mm Mim Mm m mm am MOM Mim M© mm imm =3 Rom Mim mm Imm Mm =m MOM Mim mm mm IMM 0� mm Mim mm Mim m Mm MOM Mim mm mm Mim =3 mm Mim mm Mim I mm MOM IMM Mm = MM MM mm Mim MM Milm =a mm MOM MM == mm IMM mm mm Mim Mm Mim mm == MOM Mim Mm mm MIM mm mo Mim Mim mm Mm IMM Mim mm mm Mim mm mm Mim Mim SI■ ■■ IM■ MI■ MEMO M■ ■■ es m■ NO ME MU =o = o min Wo mo im© M© Mn mim mm Imm mm oo mr ors mr mot rm Milm ®m mo m m MIM mm mm mmMm mm ■■ ■■mo MKI mom �■ �■ �■ ■■ �■ ■■ ■■ �■ ■■ �■ MrA ©rn ©ram m,ra ©rn mr Im mm my �� M� elm mr.m 0m Kmrm mm mm mP.� ors mm Mim Mm MIM m4 mm m3lm zmrm Emm mm ®r�1 mr7 mm MIM Mm � ®lam ©ra ®va MIM mrM MM EMU ora IMM MIM MM MIM mm ors MOM IMM mo On= MIN MEN mm MIM MM MIM mo mm om MM mo mica MIN wim == Mimi == Mimi Rom ©m ©ram IMM =o mm Mim ma mm Mimi Mm Mimi mo mo MOM Mim mo r321 MIN mm Mm Mimi =01 Wim mm mm MOM Min mm mm WIM mirm Mm Imm mm Imm mm mm MOM Mlm mm mm Mimi mra mm mm Mm Wim mm Mm IMM Mimi mo mm MIM mm Mm mm ==1 MI= mm =a IMM 0 0 m mm == mm Mm Mimi �m mm MIM Mimi mm mm IMM mm mm Mimi Mm Mimi mo mm MIM MIN Mm mm MIM mm = Mm Mimi mm Mm SW MIM mm mm Mimi mm M Mm IMM mm Mm MOM MIN mm mm MIM mm =m Mimi mm mo MIM mm mm mm MIN mm Mm Mimi mm mo IMM Mimi Mm mo Mimi mm Mm Mimi mo mm MOM Mimi mm mm Mimi mm mm Mimi mm mm MOM MIN mm mm MIN mm Mm Imm No ■■ M■ on No No M■ No No M■ m© mw mm vsm Sep Z6 ZBBZ 13:28:16 Via Fax —> 71496Z8356 Blake hnderson Fasc B91 01F BB6 Groundwater W Replenishment System September 26, 2002 Dear Friend: want to share with you recent articles that appeared in The Orange County Registerand Los _. Angeles Times, Orange County about the Impact of the drought and other conditions on the water level of Orange County's large Nnderground basin. We are working with representatives of the cities and water agencies that use the basin to determine the best way to refill our groundwater supplies. As you know, local agencies and the Metropolitan Water District are looking for ways to prevent future shortages. They include development of new local supplies, such as the Groundwater Replenishment(GWR) System. The QW R System,scheduled to go on line in 2007. will provide a new source of reliable, high quality Water, which will make us more water independent and resistant to the impacts of a drought. I've also enclosed a copy of a letter tq the editor that was recently submitted to The orange County Register. in response to an opinion article by Peer Swan on the Groundwater Replenishment System. If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Ron Wildermuth, public information officer for the Orange County Water District, at (714)378-3351 of rwdlderm uthQocwd.com. Sincerely. Iry Pickier Chairman Joint Cooperative Committee A pm C#n of We nnug Coin9 V1 0aua VVM 4m¢c C„w- Swu n0avrt (714)378-3200 - F.(711)378.3391 - 10SW aus A.xlwe Foummn WOer - Qa fom¢92709 Sep 26 2"&Qt7lBO&OXe�dfer > 714%Z0356 Blake Anderson Page 002 Of B06 Tuesday, September 24, 2002 Front Page Countys water bank has been overdrawn Environment•Drop in the aquifer level Not dry we afe 1S LlY aaweWmtrs 1*100 ama+rWnnu f" sus le latest Sign aoppm iousmseu N.n in wrwrs Re Bawler serves of a severe drought. nnaewumm nr By PAT BRENNAN Reese faYAly PM WtM ANe GAPY RBPPINa W/rin Tea 0'4 q co uur Resister The enormous under- ground aquifer That provides water to more than 2 million Orange County residents has e been overdrawn by more than 133 billion gallons - the big- gest drop in a decade and the latest sign of a severe and worsening drought. Orange County Water Dis- trict experts say the over- draft,which comes to 411,000 acre-feer, is nor enough to \� bring serious consequences just yet.The county has seen Tee Resister lower levels, including a re- cord overdraft of 700,000 acre-feet in 1956 Still, the overdraft will likely push up water rates,et- they in the next:few months or Ben year. The Orange County Water Disinn.which supplies water to 2.2 mills a of the countys 2.9 million res- idents, has begun looking for ways to make up the deficit -Qwte frankly, that snakes us uBcotrdarmble," said Vir- ginia Grebbien, water district WAT99 -PAGE 4 Sep 26 Z 33enun V. Fa -> 714%M56 Blake Nndemon page HM [If BB6 g ty Neffler Tuesday,September 24,2002 WATER. 'Not a crisis' - Front Page MUM Pau T Orange County Water Dis- uncrboard about when in Take general manager.-That's not action. where we want to be.' Water producers - Elie ci- - The overdraft means water ties,water districts and other . is being removed from The agencies Char pump water . aquifer Inner Than it is being from the ground - are given replenished.Normally during an allotment of water they we dry years, the district does allowed to draw from the . not like to exceed a deficit of aquifer.They import the rest,. 201001) a feet. IAn acre- at higher cost. Poor of water is enough To The presetax allotment is 75 supply two sitWe-family percent-Thar is,each agency homes for a year.) can draw 7S perrear of The The overdraft has not water it needs To supply its caused my problems yet,and customers from the aquifer. no culaums or earreme con- The Orange County Water setvadon measures are being District will discus in board considered. The barriers meetings in October whether against seawater intrusion are to cut that all'mem in order not affected. to conserve more of the -Its nor a rinds."Grebbien said. Grebbien says she advo- The Metropolitan Water cures doing so in April. Nor- District.which provides more malty, the allotments are ad- than half the water consumed lusted each April.and keeping in So—lyre California, will TO that sr+.d,,lc will help the pump 90,000 in 100.000 water producers avoid bud- acre-feer afwater into Orange Benny canes - as well as a Counry's aquifer by years sudden spike in water rates. end TO help with The problem But some board members. MWD offjeW soul she saiA,wart To can The allot- The, regional aquifer, deep mein sooner. deposits of water in the soil Patrick Scanlon of Tim and rocks beneath northern Southern California Water and central Orange County, Ca. who also is head of a ,provides about half the coup- group That reliumems north- . tys drinktag water,the rest is em and central canary's 15 To imported from Northern Cali- 20 producers, said the pro- farina and the Colorado ducers wam Elie board TO wait River. until Apr1L The overdraft would he -Right now all of in, from enough to supply 800.000 she retail level are aware of :homes for a year. the situation,' Scanlon said. A prolonged dry spell un the -We Think irs a serious sit- .region is To blame. The nation.However,we-want to county has Our seen a union be sure everyone understands .that dropped a full inch of That we don't want to overre- ram in 587 days. act.- , Inland areas"'madly help sciatica said be could nor recharge The munty+s aquifer yet mumme how mach water by sending water down the rates might increase if the SmwAta River,bat they,tin, producers' ground-waxer id- are dry. lc—eur is cut.They mold be Drought conditions prevail reduced to drawing only 57 as more thaw half the nation. percent of Their weer from The causes.however,are be- the aquifer,or To some higher lieyed to vary from region 1.0 level Thai is less than 75 per legion, ter,.lint that decision has or, The aquifer overdraft has yet been made by the Orange led 10 a split opinion on the County Water District. _ Sep 26 ZVAJJ AE8fi7WtsPax -> 714%26356 Blake Andemon Page B84 OC 806 Tuesday,September 24,2002 - Page B3 - Lowered Aquifer Will- Raise Water Imports and Cost MPftJes:Agent-ysay5m0 and unto 23 local sass apirmn. - mTpch has been pumped, rry smq'c rod ru by nun, and buying elsewhere Clurvnt Pokey snares a cadger -overdruft• of 20DA00 acre-feet, may increase nge[st rates. whch allows Yemaaler fees two wet years to be absorbed. __... By SgEt4A MaffA BUT the overdraft has grown to Quantal➢wRM more than dcubletha[nutlet. Flan Summer, n became Ohm- 7bomuchwater has been dmwm nag'Wddermadh Wd.'We're at hap orangr Cowry,vacs Mace- tmuntg poser ware Ore need 10 re- gmwn agWer, which ww meat v the producnod cars of the bu- more wooded water at greater am versus arc shady m pm water easAfar more than 2 milhoa people, back unto car basin.We need to On. of0male saw Monday. vest m new ways m get water unto 7 think wets Waiting a higher the ground- walfr rates neat year: saw non Jerry d Rung,prradent of the Wdllemmh, epdkemnan for the Osage Camay Water ➢lams[, Orange Camay Ware Dztmt, sad m a waned azte,c-t, -We wbch otanages the maemve cruder- must back on provwmg 75%of the grodndband that server the north- floeal]euppl➢until we van wprs n em end central parts of the rotary. our aWtly to argime um water .Wq'maratummgpamt- and bald fambucs to put water Oriaels remised the, year that cal oibcgroutC popplaron gromb coupled With Such a move Wound be 4 new. vgulfirantly belowaverap rainfall suwrly-6axd stncegy for the dw mmreaappt too much Water Was beog trot.The"rid has operated an a pughdframthebasid detnan4•mad plan, cal anetly Tp offset that.23 maces add local prdvidmg 75%of the local need. water ageuon will have m reduce The distrtct wilt also cmnrder met enhance on load gmund veer- Wye to encourege romerramn ter and mcreore rMMMT= of and menace the amount of epics udported waeu,Whch costs rare reps—shmg The halm Those than three press as much ]seal waved be to addhah to the several Water rates wmdd also rune m Pay pmgr<me eddermdy,t4Ch as devel- for dcvelopmg new vap to replen- cp dent of a$806mdban system m uh toe gmuddwaer.Na Wdrtlgen [run sewage trnawarer. are ed,hmeever. The w m aver disrr's smffwW be fly. 75% of The dridnng gin proposing eolutiwa Ed the Water On mmhenn and central Board art ➢nectars m coaung Grasse County w drawn from the months,but do sealer denmmu are gm4W Were,wmrh roars f127 per expected yard Fmg. The water atrefwt tad acre-foot w roughly raudwlmuldaNecr how deeply crt- eaygh to serve lava households ]ed local suppires are cat. for a gear). The rernadder w to, The roust➢ assay has MOM P.rEcd at $01)per arx-fau[ frOM edy muggled tudtghom its as- Not�hesa Caldmua and the Colo- year hmory m halaocmg wmh- ndaarver. dtawalrfrom the basest wahreplen- T�P water bdem. Whlcb IS as i9bme0L It's an mtamCI adedce deep as two F]arl Tm and 365 because dreughr populabw s1tgrs rotes od = surface, holds growth and other factors can strew 10 gWhm m 40 M91iwh aae-feee the equatcco. In the late 45U Up 1.5 dwrdn are eaabh,at arm drought pushed the overdraft to its one nme. lowest level ever-700,000 ear . Wells pull Wets to the surface feetor20feetbelowsealeveL - Sep 26 2002 13:30:46 Via Fax -> 7149620356 Blahe Anderson Page BE of 0% nIBCO's ry`"C E,P3_ (Liw9 PniuPLrWTnONr rFRRr A.RING - _ wi3 aNU+ISTFa �' 11 Q LaMR 14II V_NMNL BMn � � v_ PaWY®PimmY OENGRZJWO 9 . 0 l.W x RJR LW V. nEBRT 90 P rxN M.FWft Ory OF��"� WMKAGN2aaEN SJWTTF N �Armtlpi' cRWAUsO ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT G�� WYNENCE P xwuanen JR 1W RCNLFR Orww CGunryv Groumwarer Aummy mm.sm September 19,2002 Editor The Orange County Register P.O.Box 1)626 Same Ana,CA 92711-1626 Dear Edison Re: "Too much project too soon,"by Peer Swan,September 17,2002 As part of an and region, Orange County faces a continuing challenge:how to provide a reliable supply of water for the future. For crow,water purchased from outside the area has been part of the answer.In the years ahead,however,cutbacks are expected on water imported through the Metropolitan Water District(MWD),while at the same time our families will continue to have families. local agencies and M WD are looking for water supplies to prevent furore shortages. Indeed,MWD's long-range plan for Southern California's future water supply includes water transfers from agriculture to urban arras,storage programs,ocean desalimg and the development of new'supplies through local programs,such as the Groundwater Replenishment System. Though M WD is diligently working to develop water management programs to offset its expected cutbacks,it is important for Orange County to contribute to MWD's efforts by developing local supplies. One of Orange County's contributions to future water reliability is the Groundwater Replenishment(GWR)System,which will provide a locally-controlled new source of high quality water.The system will serve two purposes: about half the water will act as a bather against seawater intrusion into the groundwater basin and the rest wdl help replenish the underground basin in Cenral and North Orange County. The GWR System is already a phased project.The first phase will produce approximarcly 72,000 acre-feet of new water(one acre-foot is enough water for two small families for one year) beginning in 2007. Future phases could double the size of the project. We have to plan now for future needs because projects such as this one take 10 to 20 years to complete. We can't wait. Regarding cast,we realized from the start tbat the cost of GWR System water must be competitive with imported water. We believe it will be. For example,the barrier requires an P.O.ii r foot.F,. n VNI9y,CA a272&aom • 1GSm FLn A.awa,F Mn ft"..CA a27W Ta1WW (714)37&32Gt F"(71499-3373 WBD Peae.wm.amn Sep 26 2882 13:31:Z4 Via Fax -> 7149620356 Blake Anderson Page 886 of 886 Letter to the Editor September 19,2002 _ Page 2 unintemtptible supply of treated water. MWD's rate for unintetruptible treated water is approximately$455 per acre-foot.The estimated cost of GWR System water is$450 per acre- foot,and that water will be available when we need it in the summer to replenish the _ groundwater basin. It will cost about 75 cents—about two postage staraps—per household,per month to have this higher-quality,locally-controlled and reliable water is what is essentially a desert. We know from several surveys"Orange County residents want a reliable, locally-controlled source of high quality water.The Groundwater Replenishment System helps meet these needs. The GWR System is supported by many city and business groups within Orange County. The project has been awarded nearly$100 million in grants from state and federal agencies. Orange County needs to ensure its residents and businesses have sufficient water supplies,now,and in the funim -and the GWR System is a giant step in that direction. Sincerely, Virginia Grebbim P.E. General Manager (714)378-3220 SEP 25 2002 2:47PM HP LRSERJET 3200 P t SYMGRO A Reridaa6 Mw,+a,.W Campnny September 25, 2002 Sent via fax transmittal to: 714-962-0356 Omagc County Sanitation District Blake Anderson P.O. Box g 127 Fountain Valley, CA 92729 Re: Board Action Relative to Lamb Canyon - Dear Blake : Yesterday, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors tabled art agreement with Synagm to move the compost facility to the Lamb Canyon landfill. This does not rnean that the relocation will not be revisited at a later date, but for now that agreement is tabled. The practical effect of this decision is that Synagro will return to litigation over its existing site In Temescal Canyon. We will also continue our biosohds recycling educational campaign county-wide, to ensure that the citizens understand the ramifications of the Board of Supervisor's recent efforts in banning Class B land application, possibly banning Class A land application and refusing Synagro's offer to relocate and/or upgrade the only compost facility in Riverside County. In the meantime, we want you to be comfortable that your biosohds management services through Synagro are secure. The litigation will take at Mast 2 years and during that time, the facility will be open to receiving biosohds. We are,also optimistic that the litigation will result in a secure permit through 2009. In addition, the benefit in dealing with a national company such as Synagro, is that we have other fully permitted operations to shift tonnage to if necessary, including Arizona Soils and Mojave Valley composting facilities for Sub-Class B material, as well w land application programs in Mojave and Arizona, for those agencies that create a Class B material. If your agency is interested in learning more about these options,please let us know. Think you for your continued support. Synagro remains committed to serving your agency through the lowest cos; most stable options and we will continue to represent the industry m maintaining these options, as well as educating the public. If you have any questions or concerns, Please feel free to contact either Lome Loder or myself at(909)277-2662. yours, 7 P.Goodwin eml Manager 5.w raspvri 9)C 7-266 o-1%.:(•rds,art. P.O.am]02],Urom,U 938]e-]02 • Ph p09)2]]-M63•Pu:(9a9)277.7957•Toll Fae(900)243-2222 AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 108" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING October 23, 2002 —7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 64954.2,this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tern, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 10/23/02 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager 1. 30/30 Monthly Update C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the regular meeting held on September 25, 2002 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 09/15/02 09/30/02 Totals $5,339,955.32 $8,613,354.20 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director or staff member, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100536-OB, issued to OCB Reprographics for Specification No. 9900-05, for an additional amount of$125,000, for a total amount not to exceed $225,000, providing for additional services. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 10/23/02 Page 3 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re October 23, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 25, 2002 to be filed. C. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the October 23, 2002 meeting. d. Verbal report by Chair of Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee re September 26, 2002 meeting. e. DRAFT URBAN RUNOFF AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 26, 2002 to be filed. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re the October 2, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 2, 2002 to be filed. C. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$285,000 for Phase II Biotrckling Filter Demonstration Project, SP-90, for a total budget of$735,000, as an alternative treatment to control odors; and, (2)Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Study Agreement with the University of California, Riverside to provide continued support for testing biotrickling filters as an air emissions control technology for an additional amount of$60,000,which includes a $15,000 contingency; for a total amount not to exceed $205,000. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re the October 3, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 3, 2002 to be filed. C. Ratify use of General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for a purchase order issued to Ken Thompson, Inc. to construct a sewer line within Prospect Avenue in the City of Tustin,for an amount not to exceed $234,213. 10/23/02 Page 4 d. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Construction Agreement with Southern Contracting Company for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-33-1A, indemnifying Southern Contracting Company for installing, connecting, and energizing equipment suitable for electrical unclassified areas, which will be located and operating in areas classified as hazardous. e. (1)Approve a budget amendment in the amount of$2,180,000, increasing the overall budget to$7,430,000 for the Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87; (2)Approve plans and specifications and authorize advertising for public bids; and (3)Authorize the General Manager to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder for an amount not to exceed $4,100,000. f. Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, providing for additional design engineering and materials testing services for an additional amount of$555,403, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,754,511. g. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates/Montgomery Watson Harza for the preparation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Environmental Impact ReporVEnvironmental Impact Statement, Contract No. 2-41,for an amount not to exceed $420,000. h. Receive and file Final Comprehensive Odor Control Program Evaluation and Improvement Report (A.K.A. Odor Control Master Plan), Job No. J-71-4,dated July 31, 2002, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the October 9, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 9, 2002 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2002. d. Approve revised SAFETY-POL 101, and SAFETY-POL 202, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. e. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-19, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. 10/23/02 Page 5 f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-20, Declaration of Official Intent to Reimburse Certain of the District's Capital Reserve Funds for Expenditures Made in Advance for FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Projects from Proceeds of a Future Long-Term Financing. g. (1) Establish a budget of$200,000 for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment, Specification No. CS-2002-112BD; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to solicit bids and subsequently award a Consultant Services Agreement for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment, Specification No. CS-2002-112BD, in an amount not to exceed $200,000. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee re October 14, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 16, 2002 to be filed. C. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$35,166,000 increasing the OCSD's budget to $236,372,000; and, (2)Approve Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project. d. Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline Project, OCWD Contract No. GWRS-2001-3,funded under Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)Job No. J-36, Groundwater Replenishment System, in the total amount of$ 3,381,000, with OCWD and OCSD paying equal shares of$1,690,500. e. (1)Approve Emerson/Westinghouse as the supplier for the process control system (PCS)for the Groundwater Replenishment (GW R) System based on a lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$2,369,916; (2) Approve a Pre-Selection Agreement between Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Emerson/Westinghouse for engineering services in the amount of$312,110, and a pricing structure for PCS equipment to be procured under future contracts valued at$1,640,132, for a total not to exceed $1,952,242; and, 10/23/02 Page 6 (3) Approve a Task Order between OCW D and Emerson/Westinghouse providing for engineering services for the PCS design and standards development in an amount not to exceed $312,110, to be equally shared between OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District. 16. Review of draft ocean discharge permit application— Information Only 17. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re existing litigation, Orange County Sanitation District, at al. v. County of Kem, et al., Tulare County Superior Court Case No. 189564. (Government Code Section 54956.9) 2. Confer with Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Director, Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel, and Doug Johnson of Johnson & Associates, re Classification and Compensation Study(Government Code Section 54957.6). 3. Confer with Blake Anderson, General Manager, re salaries, benefits, terms and conditions of employment for At-Will Contracts with Executive Management Team (Government Code Section 54957.6). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 10/23/02 Page 7 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 20. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for November 20, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. 21. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all ! items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. I i General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 i Director of Finance Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 Director of Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 Director of Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 1 Director of Operations & j Maintenance Bob Ooten (714) 593-7020 ! i Director of Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714) 593-7400 Director of Information Technology Patrick Miles (714) 593-7280 Assistant to General Manager Greg Mathews (714) 593-7104 j General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff (714) 564-2605 I GAw .dWagendaOoaN Agendasr2002 Board Agendas1102302 agenda.doc Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2002 �oJNt SANITgT�Oy a ? � n o -a �cT�b TG HE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 • Minutes for Board Meeting _ Page 2 ' 09/25/02 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on September 25, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken, Chair Tom Daly X Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Steve Simontan A Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy A Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Laurann Cook Larry Crandall A Brian Donahue David Shawver X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer A John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley X Beth Krom Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff A Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan A Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams A Jerry Sigler Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith Paul Walker Ix IKenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Mike Moore; Ed Torres; Jim Colston; Bud Tafolla Minutes for Board Meeting _ Page 3 09/25/02 OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Kris Lindstrom; Jan Vandersloot; Zack Barrett; Greg Jewell; Darrell A. Nolte; Art Perry;Jim McKibben;Andrew Zacharias; Randy Fuhrman; Joey Racano; Doug Korthoff; Don Hughes Chair McCracken stated Closed Session would be considered at this time. 18. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(b)(1):The Board convened in closed session at 7:04 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, to discuss Agenda Item No. 18(a)(1). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item No. 18(a)(1). Director Debbie Cook left the Closed Session at 7:14 p.m. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 7:26 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons expressed concern over or about methods of treatment, ocean discharge issues, water issues and possible Brown Act violations: Doug Korthoff, Joey Racano, Darrel A. Nolta, and Jan Vandersloot. Randy Fuhrman requested the Directors to delay approval of Item 12(e), Resolution No. OCSD 02-18, which would approve land filling of biosolids until the long-range biosolids study is completed. He also spoke regarding Item 16(2), and asked Directors to consider bleaching as a short-term solution, and not a permanent solution, until better methods, such as ultraviolet treatment, can be utilized. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair McCracken announced Director Steve Anderson was the District's representative on the Council of Governments, and Director Jim Ferryman will serve as the alternate. Chair McCracken reported that the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff would meet on September 26; OMTS Committee—October 2 at Plant No. 2; PDC Committee—October 3; and, FAHR Committee—October 9. Director Norm Eckenrode was presented a Resolution of Commendation for his service to the Board as Chair from July 2000 to July 2002. Service awards and pins were presented to the following employees for their years of service to the District: Gary Streed—35 years; Fran Morrison—25 years; Bud Tafolla—25 years. Minutes for Board Meeting _ Page 4 • 09/25/02 REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, announced that Lisa Murphy was leaving the District. He commended Lisa for her leadership and counsel during her time as Communications Manager. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL - Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, reported that no action was taken by the Directors on the Item listed for closed session that evening. Representatives of EPA and the Regional Board did not make a presentation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the adjourned meeting held August 21,2002, and the regular meeting held August 28, 2002 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 08/15/02 08/31/02 Totals $9,131,689.83 $7,557,167.91 Director Mark Leyes abstained. CONSENT CALENDAR NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the September 25, 2002 meeting. Chair McCracken reported the Joint Management Committee for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation project(SARI) had met on September 24. The committee concurred with staffs selection of the firm, ESA, to prepare the environmental documents on the project. The Committee also reviewed eight alternatives for relocating or protecting-in-place the SARI line, and directed staff to explore the question of project management by the Corp of Engineers. This issue is to be reviewed by the PDC Committee. A report on the Orange County infrastructure report card, which would be released to the public on October 10, was given by the General Manager. The report card is the result Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 09/25/02 of joint efforts by the American Society of Civil Engineers, UC Irvine, and the California Rebuild America Coalition (CAL RAC). Asset management and staffs plans to implement the program were also discussed by the General Manager. This program will be the District's future organizing principle for how the District will plan, design, construct, operate and maintain capital facilities. The program should enable staff to improve the District's cost-effectiveness and long-term _ sustainability. Chair McCracken reported there were several items presented by the staff and discussed by the committee. a) Various ocean discharge permit issues with EPA representatives and the RWQCB; b) Additional scope of services to be provided by the District's legislative consultant, ENS Resources Consulting Services, in Washington, DC. The Committee confirmed the General Managers action to secure the services of ENS to secure EPA construction grants and to advocate a change to the Clean Water Act to deal with the unforeseen circumstance of a public wastewater treatment agency voluntarily electing to not re-apply for a 301(h) permit; C) Determined to take no action to support Proposition 50, the Clean Water and Coastal Protection Bond, that is on the November ballot; and, d) OCWD and OCSD General Managers have agreed to the terms and conditions of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Groundwater Replenishment System project. The agreement will be reviewed by the three standing Committees and considered for approval by the Board of Directors of both agencies in October. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 28, 2002 to be filed, as revised and corrected. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the September 4, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 4, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve funding for agencies that require additional Flow monitoring and updates to Master Plans and Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Plans in the amount of$229,750; (2)Approve funding for the FY 2002-03 Cooperative Projects Program in the amount of$125,000,for the City of Anaheim; (3)Approve time extensions to Cooperative Projects Program contracts with the following cities: Cypress (CP-0103), Fountain Valley (CP-0002 and CP-0104),' Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 09/25/02 Garden Grove (CP-0003 and CP-0119), La Habra (CP-0106, CP-0126 and CP-0127), Orange (CP-0009, CP-0010, CP-0011 and CP-0012), Santa Ana (CP-0016), Villa Park (CP-0013 and CP-0014); and, ' (4)Authorize the General Manager to approve time extensions for projects that include flow monitoring which are delayed due to lack of rain. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$1,655,000 for Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Project, SP-90, as an alternative treatment to achieve secondary treatment standards; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, in a form approved by General Counsel,for Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Project, SP-90, providing for engineering services, equipment testing, design and construction improvements to the existing test facility, in an amount not to exceed $1,555,000, which includes a $200,000 contingency. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-18, in Support of Biosolids Recycling, and repealing Resolution No. OCSD 00-05. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Patterson, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the September 5, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 5, 2002 to be filed, as corrected. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, with Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$73,289 and a time extension of 190 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,049,506; and, (2) Accept HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Clarifiers E & G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1,with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$8,939, increasing the total contract amount to$825,035; and (2)Accept Clarifiers E & G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Minutes for Board Meeting . Page 7 09/25/02 e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$500,000 for Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M. N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. 122-39, fora total budget of$15,154,000; and, (2) Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K. L, M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2,Job No. 102-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$133,734 and a time extension of 45 calendar days, increasing the _ total contract amount to$10,916,329. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements, Job No. SP2001-21,with MMC, Inc., authorizing an addition of$21,020, and a time extension of 58 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $214,121; and, (2)Accept Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements, Job No. SP2001-21, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2000-59, with Punchlist Contractors, authorizing an addition of$51,364, Increasing the total contract amount to$159,764, and a time extension of 131 calendar days. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Scrubber Monitor and Control,Job No. J-71-7, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$91,069, Increasing the contract amount to$1,254,569. i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$28,792 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, for a total budget of$2,011,073; and, (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $48,792 and a time extension of 21 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,411,073. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pimie, Inc. to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station;Contract No. 1-10, for an amount not to exceed $3,186,027. k. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a budget amendment of $523,000 to Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, for a total project budget, to be reimbursed by Boyle Engineering, in the amount Of$969,000. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc., for additional engineering services for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6; Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 09/25/02 for an additional amount of$199.123, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $333,981. M. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$100,913 for Long Range Biosolids Management Plan,Job No. J-40-7,for a total project budget of$572,913; and, (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for engineering services for the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, for an amount not to exceed $490,913. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Brady, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the September 18, 2002 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 18, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 2002. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Revise the following five positions for the Engineering and Operations and Maintenance Departments that were inadvertently not included during the FY02103 budget process: (1)One vacant Construction Inspector position upgraded to an Engineer position; (2)One vacant Project Specialist position upgraded to an Engineer position; (3)One vacant Principal Engineering Associate position upgraded to an Engineer position; (4)One Limited Term Contract Engineer position changed to a full time Senior Engineer position; and, (5) One Limited Term Contract Engineer position changed to a full time Engineer position. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Authorize staff to solicit proposals from auditing fines for Internal Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2002-108BD; and, (2) That a sub-committee be formed including Roy Moore and Joy Neugebauer, to conduct interviews of the three finalists, and that a contract be subsequently awarded by the Board of Directors at a future meeting. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 09/25/02 f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment - of$171,073 for Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study, Phase II and It, for a total budget of$294,500; and, (2)Authorize staff to issue a change order to the purchase order contract issued to Carollo Engineers, for an additional amount of$37,600,for a total amount not to exceed $150.600. 15. DRAFT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair of the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on September 16, 2002. Director Eckenrode reported the Committee recommended approval of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The agreement will be placed on the board agenda for consideration in October. The Chair ordered the Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on August 12 and August 26, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. decreasing the authorized amount by$2,945,100,from $35,890,804 to a total amount not to exceed $32,954,704, for a change in the Scope of Work in accordance with the Professional Services Agreement for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36,with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District sharing the deduction in an equal amount of$1,472,550. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an Orange County Water District issued Task Order to Westin Engineering, Inc.for an amount not to exceed $290,000 for implementation planning for the Integrated Information System for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District sharing equal costs of$145,000. Director Steve Anderson opposed. 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file Addendum No. 7 to the Certified 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report prepared by Environmental Science Associates for the Permanent Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87; and, (2)Authorize Staff to proceed with the Permanent Short-Tenn Ocean Oulfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, as required by Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R8 2002-0055. Minutes for Board Meeting _ Page 10 09/25/02 17. Consideration of Ordinance No. OCSD-19,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District,Amending Table H of Ordinance No. OCSD-18 re Wastehauler Charges for Use: a. General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff reported the proposed adoption of the ordinance was to correct an error that was included in the ordinance adopted _ previously relating to wastehauler fees. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD-19 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-19, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Amending Table H of Ordinance No. OCSD-18 re Wastehauler Charges for Use, as an urgency measure,to be effective immediately. 19. Director Debbie Cook requested a report on all of the District's lobbying and advocacy efforts to include who has been retained, what the District is expecting to receive and has received to date for the efforts, as well as incurred and future costs. Director Beth Krom posed questions regarding ENS Resources efforts to obtain a possible amendment to the Clean Water Act that was considered at the Steering Committee that evening. She requested a copy of the agenda report on this issue be provided to all Directors. General Counsel responded to her questions, and advised that the General Manager has retained ENS Resources for the past several years for various waste water issues. ENS, in conjunction with the firm of John Freshman and Associates, is making contact with Orange County Congressional delegation members, seeking an amendment to the Clean Water Act that would only apply to OCSD. The amendment would allow the District until 2013 or an earlier date as set by the RWQCB in the permit,to build the facilities needed to produce effluent that meets the secondary treatment standards of the Act. The amendment would provide the District statutory protection against citizens'suits, thus the District would not need to be involved with litigation and approval of a consent decree by a federal court. 20. In response to a request during closed session for a summary of where the District is regarding the EPA position on the District's renewal of its NPDES permit, Chair McCracken reported that the District has been advised by EPA that if the District files for a regular permit, without a 301(h)waiver, the District will be in violation of the law as of the effective date of the new permit EPA will, therefore,file suit against the District based on violations of its permit terms. The EPA Chief of Enforcement and Compliance advised the Steering Committee that federal policy dictates that EPA file a suit against any agency that is violating its NPDES permit conditions. The EPA also advised they would negotiate a consent decree setting forth the terms and conditions of the permit, and that they are considering this action on the basis of imposing no financial penalties. If the District and EPA can agree on negotiated terms and obtain approval of the consent decree by the court, it will bar any other suits from outside groups or citizens. Minutes for Board Meeting - Page 11 09/25/02 ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m. Secretary of : Board of Di o of Orange Cou Sanitation ' trict G:\wp.dla�adminl3SlMnulesWW502 deft m nules.ddd Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 46341 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. $ 60.13 Demurrage Charge , 46342 Center for a New Orange County 30,000.00 Sponsorship 46343 City of Buena Park 91,968.50 Cooperative Project J-73 46344 City of Huntington Beach 1,083,602.74 Cooperative Project J-73 46345 Driver Alliant Insurance Service,Inc. 91,696.00 Boiler&Machinery Insurance Premium 46346 Driver Alliant Insurance Service,Inc. 62,208.12 Excess Liability Insurance Premium 46347 Margate Construction, Inc. 171,510.00 Construction P2-39 46348 Orange County Sanitation District 531,681.89 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 46349 California Bank&Trust 57,895.00 Construction J-33.1A,Retention 46350 Connolly-Pacific Company 100,118.00 Construction J-39 46351 J W Contracting Corporation 321,451.00 Construction P2.60 46352 Southern Contracting Company 521.058.00 Construction J-33-11A, Retention 46353 Union Bank of California 35,717.00 Construction P2-60, Retention 48354 Urbantec Engineering, Inc. 47,250.00 Construction J-66 46355 Airgas Safety 930.12 Safety Supplies 46356 Awards&Trophies Company 72.57 Plaques 46357 A T&T Wireless Services-Airtime 63.23 Cellular Telephone Service 46358 A T&T Wireless Services 6,661.64 Wireless Phone Services 46359 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 46360 Bondlogistix,L.L.C. 2,500.00 Prof.Services-Preparation of Interim Arbitrage Rebate Report Series 1992 46361 Carollo Engineers 3,678.94 Engineering Services-Installation of High Rate Mix Pump on Digester R 46362 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 46363 CompuMaster On-site 5,900.00 Human Resources Training Registration 46364 County of Orange 6,679.20 Engineering Services-Trunk Sewer Mapping 1.98 46365 CASA 300.00 Lab Meeting Registration 46366 CEM Corporation 19,522.68 Lab Parts&Supplies 46367 CR&R, Inc. 315.00 Container Rentals 46368 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 8,336.31 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 46369 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 46370 Environmental Data Solutions Grps.,L.L.C. 16,398.75 Professional Services-Air Information Management System(AIMS) 46371 City of Fountain Valley 700.00 Joint Project J-90 46372 Hill Brothers 15,056.72 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 46373 Hunton&Williams 496.00 Lab Meeting Registration 46374 Industrial Metal Supply 1,641.34 Metal 46375 Industrial Threaded Products.Inc. 31.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46376 Inneriine Engineering 620.00 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 46377 Intl. Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,177.75 Dues Deduction 46378 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 3.318.70 Traffic Signs&Misc. Hardware 46379 Law Journal Press 82.63 Publication 46380 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 797.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46381 National Plant Services,Inc. 4,152.50 Vacuum Truck Services 46382 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Garnishment 46383 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 1,216.42 Fittings Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/1SM2 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46384 Oxygen Service Company 1,449.64 Lab Parts&Supplies 46385 OCS Reprographics 136.73 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 46386 OCEA 469.11 Dues Deduction 46387 Pacific Bell 40.07 Telephone Services 46388 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 46389 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 46390 Peeve OfBoers Council of CA 1,053.00 Dues Deduction 46391 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 1,918.99 Specialty Gases 46392 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 513.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46393 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 46394 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 486.00 2002-03 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc. Fees 46395 Southern California Edison 9,863.50 Power 46396 Summit Steel 141.57 Metal 46397 Textile Engineering Associates 5,250.52 Belt Press Supplies 46398 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 6.089.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46399 Transmit 3.737.73 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46400 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 420.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 46401 U.S Postal Service 5.000.00 Postage 46402 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 46403 UC Regents 1,250.00 Membership 46404 Verizon California 765.60 Telephone Services 46405 YCA 995.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration 46406 Nicholas J.Arhontes 253.46 Meeting/Tmining Expense Reimbursement 46407 Marc A- Brown 673.45 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement 46408 Barbara A.Collins 221.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46409 Steven R. DeWAde 575.02 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 46410 Martin A.Dix 780.44 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46411 Kathy L.Waldron 140.06 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement 46412 Employee Activity Committee 27.00 Service Award Expense 46413 Environmental Lab Accreditation Program 3,119.00 Lab Certification 46414 Project Management Institute 30.00 O&M Training Registration 46415 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 96.152.00 Professional Services J-73.2 48416 AKM Consulting Engineers 43,158A3 Professional Services 7-41 46417 EIMCO/Baker Process 25,601.40 Rebuild CIMCO C54 Drive 46418 Black&Veatch Corporation 487,336.20 Engineering Services J-77&P1-76 46419 Blue Cross of California 274,709.52 Medical Insurance Premium 46420 Brown&Caldwell 81,286.51 Engineering Services J-25-6&1-98 46421 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 122,476.68 Engineering Services J40-8 46422 Carollu Engineers 179,474.08 Professional Services P1-60,P2-60,J-39&J-25.4 46423 Center For Urban Infrasrocture Comm. Dsgn. 25,000.00 Sponsorship 46424 Delta Dental 48,556.22 Dental Insurance Plan A6425 Driver Alliant Insurance Service,Inc. 127,648.42 California Municipal Excess Liability(CAMEL)Insurance Premium 46426 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 40,292.34 Medical Insurance Premium 46427 Kemhon Pacific, Inc. 112,087.10 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08101/02 to 08115/02 Warrant No. Vendw Amount Description 46428 Lee&Ro, Inc. 167.390.24 Professional Services P2-47-3,J-71-7,5-49,"1 &5.52 46429 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 119.477.28 Engineering Services J-42 46430 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 40,589.06 Prof.Svcs.-Meter Mooring,Plume Modeling,P1-85&Oceen Monitoring 46431 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 100,119.55 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 46432 U.S. Peroxide 51,187.16 Hydrogen Peroxide 46433 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 82,476.67 Engineering Service J-67 46434 The Yakima Company 67,008.77 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 46435 Ken Thompson,Inc. 385,408.00 Construction 546 46436 Urbamec Engineering,Inc. 56,7D0.00 Construction J-66 46437 Internal Revenue Service 696,200.00 Arbitrage Rebate Installment Re 1992 Series Certificates of Participation 46438 Orange County Sanitation District 26,265.81 Workers Comp.Reimb. 46439 A-Plus Systems 4.292.40 Notices&Ads 46440 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 1,897.50 Professional Services-CSG Fuel Mixing For Emission Control 46441 Airgas-West 49.40 Lab Parts&Supplies 46442 Airgas Safely 8,727.60 Safety Supplies 46443 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 453.96 Instrument Supplies 46444 American Express 24,886.28 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 46445 American Utts 419.14 (1)Pallet Truck 46446 Appleone Employment Service 20,218.19 Temporary Employment Services 46447 Archer Western Contractors,Ltd. 15,380.75 Construction-Interplant Microwave Data Transmission 46448 Arizona Instrument 1.259.50 Instrument Parts&Repairs 46449 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 46450 AC Behringer, Inc. 440.16 Pump Supplies 46451 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 62.03 Telephone Service 46452 Battery Specialties 124.13 Batteries 46453 Backman Coulter, Inc. 1,419.00 Instrument Malnl.Service 46454 Bell Land Surveying 3,910.00 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 46455 Berendsen Fluid Power 627.83 Valves 46456 BIOMeflsux Vftek,Inc. 1.377.14 Lab Supplies 46457 Bongarde Communications,Ltd. 94.25 Publication 46458 Bush&Associates, Inc. 2,466.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 46459 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 378.09 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Service 46460 C.S.U.F. Foundation 9,787.50 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 46461 California Auto Collision 649.28 Vehicle Repairs 46462 California Automatic Gale 1,035.74 Maint.Agreement-Automatic Gales at Pits. 1 &2 46463 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 15,027.50 Professional Services-Activated Sludge Plant Anaerobic Selector Study 46464 Certified Truck Bodies 14.888.23 Auto Crane&Installation 46465 Charts,Inc. 197.28 Charts 46466 Communications Supply Corp. 14,377.28 Fiber Optic Cable&Electrical Parts&Supplies 46467 Compressor Components of California 3,315.00 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 46468 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2,772.50 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46469 Control Factors-Seattle,Inc. 994.80 Filler Elements 46470 Cooper Energy Services 426.34 Engine Supplies 46471 Cooper Energy Systems 832.13 Engine Supplies Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46472 Coordinated Wire Rope&Rigging 411.D9 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46473 Corporate Business Interiors 3,012.44 Kitchen Booth&Table&Installation 46474 Corporate Express Imaging 196.08 Computer Supplies 46475 Corporate Express 333.98 Office Supplies 46476 Corlech Engineering 3.833.99 Pump Supplies 46477 Cost Containment Solutions 1,199.22 Worker's Comp Services 46478 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 3.369.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46479 County Wholesale Electric Co. 546.15 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46480 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Meint.Agreement-Can Gen Water SoBner System 46481 CGvL Engineers 1,344.75 Professional Services P1-94 46482 Ciba Specially Chemicals Corporation 23.581.72 Cationic Polymer 46483 CR&R, Inc. 1,589.26 Container Rentals 46484 CWEA Membership 184.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 46485 Del Mar Analytical 3.966.50 Biosotids Analysis 46486 Department of Transportation 630.00 CALTRANS Paving Project Area-Raising OCSD Manholes 46487 Diamond H Recognition 1.380.65 Employee Service Awards 46488 DHL Worldwide Express 70.85 Shipping Fees 46489 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 742.94 Electrical Supplies 46490 Eberhard Equipment 200.74 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 46491 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 3.020.50 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-June&July 46492 Enchanter, Inc. 6,3D0.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 46493 Environmental Resource Association 2,129.45 Lab Parts&Supplies 46494 Excel Door&Gate Company,Inc. 4,669.00 Roll-Up Door at Pit.2 Dewatering 46495 ENRG 65.43 Maintenance Services-Compressed Natural Gas Station 46496 FedEx Corporation 68.64 Air Freight 46497 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 5,167.39 Lab Parts&Supplies 46498 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 315.00 Concrete Cutting 46499 Foodcraff Coffee&Refreshment Services 40.16 Meeting Supplies 46500 Fountain Valley Camera 15.89 Photo Supplies 46501 Franklin Covey 626.53 Office Supplies 46502 Frontline Management, Inc. 1,155.65 (1)Pressure Controller 46603 Full Spectrum Anatytics 4,715.50 Lab Equipment Repairs&Service 46504 G.T. Hell Company 541.67 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46505 Galbraith Laboratories, Inc. 1,080.00 Lab Analyses 46506 Ganahl Lumber Company 151.51 Lumber/Hardware 46507 Ganatt-Callahan Company 2.432.13 Chemicals 46508 General Petroleum 3.219.83 Lubricants&Oil 46509 George Yardley Co. 157.32 Lab Supplies 46510 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 11,690.88 Belt Filter Press Supplies 46511 W W Grainger,Inc. 5,405.55 trial.Parts&Supplies 46512 Graybar 8,066.21 Cabinets for CRISP Hardware System-Bacteria Reduction Program 46513 Edwards Systems Technology 680.00 Service Agreement-Fire Alarm System 46514 Haaker Equipment Company 502.72 Service Agreement- Misc.Repairs&Paris 46515 Hach clo Portion Industries 10.572.99 Lab Paris&Supplies Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46516 American Sigma,Inc. 1,906.63 Lab Supplies 46517 Halcyon Press 80.00 Publication 46518 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 499.93 Instrument Supplies 46519 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems 221.00 Meier Rental-Complete Intellitouch System Mail Center Manager 46520 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 4,724.45 Engine Generator Control Supplies 46521 Health Science Associates 1,935.50 Professional Services-J-77 46522 Heat Technology Products 14.160.10 Repair Services-(2)Heat Exchangers 46523 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 39.50 Meeting Expenses 46524 Hill Brothers 16,111.94 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 46525 Home Depot 158.54 Small Hardware 46526 Horizon Technology 1,406.38 Lab Parts&Supplies 46527 Hytom 15,567.17 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46528 [dam 8,016.60 Lab Pans&Supplies 46529 Imaging Express 209.01 Printer Maintenance 46530 Industrial Distribution Group 889.19 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46531 Industrial Metal Supply 223.41 Metal 46632 Industrial Networking Solutions 1,000.71 Electrical Pans&Supplies 46533 Infinity Technology USA 2,977.40 Computer Supplies 465M Information Resources 375.00 Human Resources Service 46535 Intelligence Press.Inc. 1,245.00 Publication 46536 Interstate Battery Systems 105.90 Batteries 46537 Ionics Instrument Business Group 989.35 Lab Parts&Supplies 46538 Iron Mountain 225.00 Bid Document Storage Fees-P1-37&J-39 46539 IBM Corp. 275.94 Malnt.Agreement-Orange County Data System-Revenue Division 46540 J.L.Wingert Company 2,411.69 Pump Supplies 46541 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 9.120.31 Meter Pit Line Repair, Bypass Line Installation&Curb Mounted Gas Flaps 46642 Jays Catering 626.04 Meeting Expenses 46643 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 2.722.65 Professional Services-Compensation&Classification Study 46544 CSC Parts Sales/Johnson Controls,Inc. 136.99 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46545 Johnstone Supply 101.93 Electrical Supplies 46546 Kensington Electronics 694.60 Electrical Supplies 46547 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 379.18 Lab Pans&Supplies 46548 Lab Support 2.293.75 Temporary Employment Services 46549 Lascomm 3.957.71 Computer Software/Hardware 46550 Lawrence Ragan Communications,Inc. 109.00 Subscription 46551 Lffamm-Safety, Inc. 489.33 Repair&Calibration of Sulfide Monitoring Equipment 46552 Line-X Protective Coatings 3,334.00 Truck Bed Coatings 46553 Luccl's 200.00 Meeting Expense 46554 Maintenance Technology Corp. 669.05 Mechanical Supplies 46555 Marilyn Shepard 700.00 Prof.Services-Pipeline Assessment&Certification Training 46556 The Marketing Group,Inc. 2,113.95 Computer Hardware Software 40557 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 651.65 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46558 MCRay Industries,Inc. g,195.68 Fittings&Fasteners 46559 Mec Analytical System 1,465.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46560 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 456.47 Mechanical Parts&Repairs 46561 Media Clips,Inc. 448.13 Notices&Ads 46562 Medlin Controls Co. 103.24 Instrument Supplies 46563 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 2,909.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46564 Mlmmk 573.06 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46565 Mission Uniform Service 4.265.96 Uniform Rentals 46566 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyvmrks 168.88 Truck Tool Box Painting Service 46567 MSA Go Mag Systems 1,508.69 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46568 National Micr000mp Services 1,212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 46569 Neal Supply Co. 3,194.93 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46570 NelVeriu nt of Southern California 7,709.26 Human Resources Security System Improvements 46571 Newark Electronics 97.80 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46572 Nimbus Press 25.00 Publication 46673 NAFA,Inc. 416.00 Membership 46574 NAS Associates, Inc. 1,656.15 Toxicity Testing 46575 O.C. Business Journal 158.00 Publication 48576 Office Depot Business Services Div. 737.56 Office Supplies 46577 OneSouroe Distributors,Inc. 148.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies 48576 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 611.37 Fittings 46579 Oxygen Service Company 1,937.63 Specialty Gases 46580 OCB Reprographics 4,389.45 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 46581 Pacific Bell 68.23 Telephone Services 46582 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 46683 Pacific Ford 19,682.45 (2)Ford F-150 12 Tan Pick-Up Trucks 46584 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,229,35 Plumbing Supplies 46586 Pacific Parts&Controls 14.285.07 Computer Hardware/Sofhvam 46586 Parker Supply Company 11.737.16 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46587 Parkhouse Tire Co. 1,611.32 Tires 46588 Parts Unlimited 71.45 Automotive Parts&Supplies 46589 Patriot Video Productions 1,216.05 Video Editing Services 46590 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 15,336.87 Caustic Soda 46591 Pioneer Amedcas, Inc. 4,696.60 Sodium Hypochlorte 46592 Power Design 4,263.46 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46593 Power Electra Supply Co.,Inc. 30.35 Electrical Supplies 46594 Praxalr,Inc. 10.45 Lab Supplies 46595 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 568.10 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 46596 Primary Source 706.61 Office Furniture 46597 Professional Publications,Inc. 194.96 Publication 46596 Projects Partners 10.737.92 Temporary Employment Services 46589 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 10,484.04 CCTV Sewerline Inspection-2.41 46600 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 3,577.30 Pumps 46601 PAPA 170.00 Membership&O&M Training Registration 46602 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 504.56 Instrument Supplies 46603 R.W.Beck 11,965.20 Professional Services Pi-90 Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46604 R.Allman&Associates 595.00 Communications Meeting Registration 46605 Rainbow Disposal Co. 174.00 Trash Removal 46606 Regents of Univ.of California 13,768.59 Professional Services J-85 46607 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 16,853.60 Emp.Life Ins. Premium,Short-Tenn Disability&Cancer Ins. Payroll Deductions 46608 RPM Electric Motors 1,177.06 (1)Motor&Repair Services 46609 Seybolt,L.P. 1,000.00 Air Analyses 46610 Schwing America,Inc. 2,473.97 Pump Supplies 46611 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 508.39 Lab Parts&Supplies 46612 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 465.00 Lab Maintenance&Calibration of CTD Profiling Sensors 46613 Seaventures 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel 46614 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 102.80 Tools 46615 Sheshuno6 289.96 Publication 46616 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,070.53 Repairs&Maintenance Materials 46617 Supelco, Inc. 131.68 Lab Supplies 46618 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 23.62 Plumbing Supplies 46619 So. Cal. Gas Company 21,317.50 Natural Gas 46620 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 486.00 AOMD&State Fees 46621 Southern California Edison 2,719.43 Power 46622 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 72.00 Carpet Cleaning Service 46623 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 63.44 Legal Services-COP Trustee 46624 Strata International, Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 46625 Summit Steel 476.68 Metal 46626 Sunset Ford 786.11 Automotive Parts&Supplies 46627 Sunset Industrial Parts 691.39 Mechancal Supplies 46628 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 17,765.13 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 46629 STL Sacramento 1,378.D0 Lab Analytical Service 46630 Terminis International Co. 275.D0 Pest Control 46631 Tetra Tech,Inc. 9,740.98 Professional Services 7-37 46632 The Orange County Register 736.88 Notices&Ads 46633 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,737.09 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46634 ThyseenKrupp Elevator 198.00 Elevator Maintenance 46635 Tonys Lock&Safe Service&Sales 296.26 Locks&Keys 46636 Toshiba International Corporation 1,237.10 Electrical Supplies 46637 Transcat 2,497.75 Electrical Supplies 46638 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 41.00 O&M Training Registration 46639 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 6,794.76 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 46640 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 380.07 Automotive Supplies 46641 Teksystems 800.00 Temporary Employment Services 46642 US Filler Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 46643 Ultra Scientific 515.03 Lab Parts&Supplies 46644 The Unisource Corporation 71.07 Office Supplies 46645 United Parcel Service 56.38 Parcel Services 46646 Universal Specialties,Inc. 27.81 Plumbing Supplies 46647 Vallen Safety Supply Company 90.92 Safety Supplies Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46648 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 5,760.00 Temporary Employment Service 46649 Varian Associates,Inc. 1,376.65 Lab Parts&Supplies 46650 Verson California 4.137.55 Telephone Services 46651 Veme's Plumbing 604.00 Service Contract-Repair Back0ow Devices 46652 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,453.80 Vision Service Premium 46653 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,271.47 Lab Parts&Supplies 46654 The Wackenhut Corporation 4.464.94 Security Guards 46655 Waxie Sanitary Supply 3B4.46 Janitorial Supplies 46656 Watson Wyatt Data Services 399.00 Publication 46657 Nexiq Technologies 185.95 Maintenance&Repair Services 46658 WQI 350.00 O&M Training Registration 46669 Xerox Corporation 4,614.12 Fax&Copier Leases 46660 Zymark Corporation 4,500.00 Service Contract-Zymate Robotic System 46661 3CMA 1,185.00 Membership&Communication Meeting Registration 46662 Patrick B.Carnahan 594.42 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46663 Janet L.Gray 432.62 Meeting(Training Expense Reimbursement 46664 Denise M.Martinez 410.95 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46665 Hoong,Tyler&Costm 1,228.39 Employee Computer Loan Program 46666 Orange County Sanitation District 1,100.00 Petry Cash Reimb. 46667 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 358.53 Permit Fees Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,438,557.06 Payroll Disbursements 27333-27333 Interim Paycheck $ 526.04 Termination Paycheck 27334.27459 Employee Paychecks 158.029.18 Biweekly Payroll 08/07/02 75501 -75969 Direct Deposit Statements 807,745.96 Biweekly Payroll D8107102 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 966,301.18 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 350,D00.00 August Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 120,389.07 Societe Generale July Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 43,825.54 July Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Manhattan Bank 77,347.93 Commitment Fee on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Societe Generale 54,646.44 Standby Letter of Credit for 1992 Refunding COPS Lloyd's TSB Bank plc 80,622.61 Letter of Credit Fee for 1992 Refunding COPs-5/1102 to 811/02 Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 726 831.59 Total Claims Paid 08101102-08/15102 $ 9,131,689.83 Claims Paid From 08/16/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 46668 Advanced Engine Techrmlogy Corporation S 39,459.56 Professional Services-CSG Fuel Mixing For Emission Control 46669 Graybar 31,809.74 Computer Hardware/Software-(20)Communication Adapters 46670 Northwest Industrial Scrub,Inc. 41,038.00 Digester Cleaning Service 46671 Orange County Sanitation District 544,697.76 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 46672 Southern California Edison 57,027.36 Power 46673 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 19.64 Mechanical Supplies 46674 AEHMS 450.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 46675 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 150.86 Telephone Service 46676 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 46677 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 46678 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 6,784.00 Replacement of UPS at Plt.2 46679 Consumers Pipe&Supply Go. 562.80 Plumbing Supplies 46680 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 105.60 Enc,cachment Permit-Warner Ave.Trunk Sewer Improv. 46681 County Wholesale Electric Co. 115.28 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46682 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 231.64 Paint Supplies 46683 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 8,321.31 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 46684 Court Order 525.00 Wage Gamishment 46685 City of Fountain Valley 1,992.64 Security Services 46686 Industrial Metal Supply 250.86 Metal 46687 Inspectlon Technologies,Inc. 92.08 Cable 46688 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Loral 501 3,159.76 Dues Deduction 46689 Irvine Ranch Water District 60.60 Water Use 46690 League Of CA Cities 129.68 Admin Meeting Registration 46691 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 94.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46692 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 3,127.50 Repairs&Reconditioning of Gearbox Shafts 46593 Motion Industries 335.56 Valves 46694 National Bond&Trust 1,175.06 U.S.Savings Bonds 46695 Orange County Sheriff 45.00 Wage Garnishment 46696 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 116.28 Fittings 46697 OCEA 478.36 Dues Deduction 46698 Pacific Bell 1,179.68 Telephone Services 46699 Padflc Process Equipment, Inc. 3.140.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46700 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 46701 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 46702 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,062.00 Dues Deduction 46703 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 46704 Southern California Edison 66.82 Power 46705 SAWPA 15,000.00 Prof.Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 46705 Taylor-Dunn 540.81 Electric Cart Parts 46707 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2.368.32 Mechanical Supplies&Repairs 46708 Tustin Dodge 170.25 Truck Supplies 46709 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 46710 USGTRG Conference on Bioliltration 700.00 O&M Meeting Registration 46711 Verizon Califomis 3.489.63 Telephone Services Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 08/16/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vend" Amount Description 46712 The Wall Street Journal 188.56 Subscription 48713 WEF 295.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 46714 Shabbir S.Basra! 100.21 Meefing?raining Expense Reimbursement 48715 William D.Cassidy 280.58 Meetingllraining Expense Reimbursement 46716 Robert P.Ghirelli 900.44 Meetingllmining Expense Reimbursement 46717 Ingrid G.Hellebrand 794.47 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 46718 Sonja A.Wassgren 226.44 Meelingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 46719 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 24,567.50 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 46720 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 16,730.94 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 46721 Air Products&Chemicals 25,758.02 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 46722 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 65,344.16 Professional Services J-73.2 46723 Black&Veatch Corporation 153,019.90 Engineering Services P2-85,J-77&J-71.3 46724 Blue Cross of California 271.530.81 Medical Insurance Premium 46725 Boyle Engineering Corporation 43,803.29 Engineering Services 1.2-4 46726 Brown&Caldwell 121,899.79 Engineering Services 241.P1-37&J-2541 46727 Caroto Engineers 386.901.29 Engineering Services P2-66&J-87 46728 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 44,414.74 (41)Computers&Software 46729 Kemkon Pacific.Inc. 150.058.58 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 46730 Lee&Ro,Inc. 90,842.09 Engineering Services P2.39,5.49.5-51 &6.52 46731 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 49,825.69 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99 46732 Orange County Water District 60,794.05 GAP Water Use MO 10.23-98 46733 Painewebber Incorporated 32.575.01 COP Remarketing Agreement- 1993 Series Certificates of Participation 46734 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 144,625.53 Chemicals 46735 R.W.Beck 139,735.06 Professional Services 3-52,5-53,5-54& 11-28 46736 Sancon Engineering.Inc. 31.200.00 Construction-Manhole Rehabilitation&Repairs 46737 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 209.236.64 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 46736 The Lewis Group 64.237.29 Consulting Service-Capital Project Management Process 46739 Tule Ranch/Magan Fars 130,006.14 Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95 46740 U.S.Peroxide 94250.44 Hydrogen Peroxide 46741 Vector Resources 26,446.86 Computer Hardware/Software-Chlorination Project 46742 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 75.328.91 Engineering Service J-67 46743 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 155.686.57 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 46744 The Yakima Company 43,509.40 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 46745 Conrrolly-Pacfic Company 200,236.00 Construction J-39 46746 Elser Constructors, Inc. 38,631,42 Construction 3-25 46747 J W Contracting Corporation 367,439.00 Construction P2.80 46748 Margate Construction,Inc. 1229,123.00 Construction P1-37 46749 Mike Prich&Sons 235,000.00 Construction-Abandonment of Alrbase Trunk Sewer(Contract 6-13-2) 46750 Swthem Contracting Company 29,169.00 Construction.F33.1A,Retention 46751 Union Bank of California 43,604.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 46762 Able Sole Repair 550.00 Loading Scales Quarterly Inspection 46753 AccuStandard, Inc. 748.95 Lab Parts&Supplies 46754 Great American Printing Co. 239.79 Printing •46755 Agilenl Technologies,Inc. 160.57 Lab Parts&Supplies 40756 Airborne Express 156.26 Air Freight Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 08116f02 to 08131/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46757 Alrgas Safely 167.83 Safety Supplies 46758 American Water Works AssocJWaler Qualty 117.00 Membership 46759 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 591.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 46760 Aquarium Doctor 156.37 lab Agwdum Services 46761 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 7.040.00 Toxicity Testing 46762 ABM Business Machines. Inc. 192.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46763 AMF Electronics,Inc. 139.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46764 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 64.83 Telephone Service 46765 Ballantyne,Inc. 13,746.00 Temporary Employment Services 46766 Basic Chemical Solutions 17.116.89 Chemicals 46767 Battery Specialties 1,051.05 Batteries 46768 Camel Financial,Inc.do Bearing Metal 556A9 Metal 46769 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 1,164.81 Piping Supplies 46770 Boot Bam 96.96 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 46771 Bush&Associates, Inc. 6.312.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 46772 Southern California Marine Institute 10,710.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 46773 Callan Associates,Inc 3.550.00 Investment Advisor&Performance Monitoring Services 48T74 Cabo,Inc. 1.210.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46775 Carleton Engineers&Consultants,Inc. 4.043.10 Engineering Services-Air Quality 46776 Cashco,Inc.,C/O Pomon Intl.,Inc. 1,779.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46777 Cecil Lue Hing&Associates, Inc. 15,430.72 Legal Services-Dist.vs.County of Kam 46778 Ce112Cell 460.88 Telephone&Pager Supplies 46779 Center for Creative Growth 1,260.00 O&M Management Coaching 46780 Communications Supply Corp. 14,193A6 Computer Hardware/Software 46781 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 5,167.27 Electrical Supplies 46782 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,499.28 Plumbing Supplies 46783 Cooper Energy Services 362.99 Engine Supplies 46794 Corporate Express 357.60 Office Supplies 46765 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 76.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46786 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 5.044-76 Over Apportionment Refund&Radio Maintenance Agreement 46787 County Sanitation Dists of Los Angeles 3.400.00 Olfactometry Lab Analyses 46788 County Wholesale Electric Co. 126.77 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46789 Cytec Industries 18,661.50 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.979&18 46790 CH2M Hill 16,664.37 Professional Service-Odor Screening 46791 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 8,941.52 Chemicals 46792 CWEA Membership 92.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 46793 Dal Mar Analytical 1,838.00 Biowlids Analysis 46794 Delta Packaging Products.Inc. 13422 Lab Supplies 46795 Demos,Inc. 362.51 Drum Platform 46796 DI91Photo 11.60 Photographic Services 46797 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 7,478.00 Painting Mainl.Services MO 4-22-98 46796 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 53.38 Paint Supplies 46799 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 443.28 Electrical Supplies 46800 Ecology Control Industries 6.476.86 Hazardous Waste Disposal 46801 Elliott Bay Design Group 1.140.85 Prof.Sew.-Prelimanry Design Cost Analysis for Ocean Monitoring Vessel Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 08/16/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46802 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 467.65 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-June 2002 46803 Enchanter,Inc. 3.000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 46804 Environmental Science Associates 17,731.45 Professional Services J-40-5 46805 ENS Resources.Inc. 4,113.23 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 46806 FedEn Corporation 115.81 Air Freight 46807 Filarsky&Watt,L.L.P. 4.466.00 Prof.Services-SPMT Negotiations It Special Services 40B08 Filler Supply Company 331.20 Fillers&Oil 46809 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 6,841.73 Lab Parts&Supplies 46810 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 270.00 Drilling at Pit.2 Headworks 46811 Foodcratt Coffee&Refreshment Services 21.45 Meeting Supplies 46812 Fountain Valley Camera 14.31 Photo Supplies 46813 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 238.47 Paint Supplies 46814 Franklin Covey 434.02 Office Supplies 46815 Frys Electronics 665.78 Computer Supplies 46816 Full Spectrum Analygcs 702.23 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Auto Sampler 46817 FST Sand and Gravel,Inc. 201.00 Road Base Materials 46818 General Petroleum 337.15 Unleaded Gasoline 46819 George Yardley Co. 249.16 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46820 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 1,750.94 Bell Filler Press Supplies 46821 W W Grainger,Inc. 26523 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46822 Graybar 3.849.33 Cabinets for CRISP System-Bacteria Reduction Program 46823 Hach do Ponton Industries 140.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 46824 American Sigma, Inc. 1,734.78 Lab Supplies 46825 Harold Primrose lop 74.00 Ice For Samples 46826 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc 125.52 Plumbing Supplies 46827 Hasco Oil Co., Inc. 80.27 Lube Oil 46828 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 8,694.35 Engine Generator Control Supplies 46829 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 84.75 Meeting Expenses 46830 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 2.441.23 Office Furniture 46831 Hill Brothers 20,149.25 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 46832 HIM,Inc. 4,231.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46833 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 835.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46834 Home Depot 873.37 Small Hardware 46835 Hopkins Technical Products 1.224.20 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46836 loam 3,353.18 Lab Parts&Supplies 46837 Imaging Express 312.77 Printer Maintenance 46838 Industrial Distribution Group 2,149.84 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46839 Industrial Networking Solutions 998.52 Power Supply 46640 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 88.46 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46841 IBM 887.22 Software Support-AS400 46542 Interstate Battery Systems 495.11 Batteries 46843 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1,499.88 Ins.Pans&Supplies 46844 Iron Mountain 75.00 Bid Document Storage Fees-Pt-37 46845 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 212.71 Offske Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 46846 Irvine Ranch Water District 22.66 Water Use Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 08/16/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46847 IOMA,Inc. 268.95 Subscription 46848 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 818.90 Traffic Signs 46849 Jamison Engineering Contractors,In. 21.959.71 Installation of Handrails at Pit.2 46850 Jim's Suspension Service 30.00 Automotive Pans&Supplies 46851 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 6,531.21 Professional Services-Benefits Survey and Compensation&Classification Study 46852 FormsTronicsRichards Capital Corporation 1212.72 Stationery&Office Supplies 46053 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 7,332.65 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12.9-90 46854 Kars Advance Materials,Inc. 6,458.00 Can Gen Engine No.2 Testing&Evaluation 46855 KL&P Marketing 1,361.29 Safety Incentive Items 46M Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 241.62 Safety Supplies 46857 Lab Support 4,079.50 Temporary Employment Services 46858 Labeltronix 4,440.00 Maintenance Agreement-Zebra Printers 46859 Law/C2ndall 556.00 Eng.Sew.-Materials Testing,Inspection&Geotechnical Services for CIP Projects 46860 Linjer Company do Gerald Jones 8,555.49 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 46861 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 11.016.43 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 46062 Manley's Boiler Repair Company,Inc. 2,670.00 Boiler Repair 46863 MassMulual Michel Financial Group 1,241.30 Executive Disability Insurance Plan Premium 46864 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 412.92 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46865 McRay Industries, Inc. 9,997.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46866 Media Clips,Inc. 65.00 Notices&Ads 46867 Michael Turnipseed&Associates 1,180.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 46868 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 13,383.28 Mechanical Parts&Repairs-High Pressure Air Compressor 46859 Mission Uniform Service 3,936.75 Uniform Rentals 46870 MOB Consulting 1,350.00 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 46871 Neal Supply Co. 383.54 Plumbing Supplies 46872 Network Catalyst,Inc. 3,534.35 Computer SofhverelHardware 46873 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 320,00 Training Registration 46874 Newark Electronics 118.42 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46875 City of Newport Beach 76.42 Water Use 46876 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,483.60 Oil 46877 Nimyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 60.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 46878 The Norco Companies 156.00 Mail Delivery Service 46879 NCG Porter Novelli, Inc. 1,000.00 Prof.Services-Public Relations 46880 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,491.77 Office Supplies 46881 Omega Industrial Supply,Inc. 568.38 Janitorial Supplies 46882 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 185.09 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46883 The Orange County Register 360.83 Subscription 46884 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 281.89 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46885 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.00 Quarterly Maintenance,Testing&Certification of Fire Sprinkler Sys.At Pits. 1 &2 46886 Oxygen Service Company 2,219.29 Lab Specialty Gases 46887 OCB Reprographics 721.64 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 468BS P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 663.16 Air Conditioner Filters 46889 Pace Analytic Services 1,550.00 Professional Services-Wastewater&Biosolids Analyses 46890 Pacific Bell 40.72 Telephone Services 46891 Pacific Mechanical Supply 818.68 Plumbing Supplies Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT 6 Claims Paid From 08/16/02 to 08131/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46892 Pacific Pans&Controls 1.077.69 Instrument Supplies 46893 Pacific States Chemical,Inc. 3.616.77 Chemicals 46894 Paco/Johnston Pump 183.48 Pump Supplies 46895 Parts Unlimited 52.39 Automotive Repairs&Parts 46896 Pdmary Source 583.19 Office Fumiture 46897 Projects Partners 24.628.82 Temporary Employment Services 46898 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 13,113.40 Sewedine Cleaning 46899 PCS Express 220.00 Courier Service 46900 Quality Soldering,Inc. 74.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46901 Ramsay Corporation 333.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46902 Realtime Systems Corporation 15,781.25 Software Consulting Services 46903 Roto Rooter 375.00 Sewer Lateral Cleaning 46904 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 2,118.31 Pump Supplies 46905 RBF Engineers 1,300.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1 46906 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 5,000.00 Engineedng Services-Basin M Repairs 46907 Saddle Island Institute 2,025.00 Engineering Training Registration 46908 Schwing America, Inc. 496.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46909 Scot Specialty Gases,Inc. 42.17 Lab Parts&Supplies 46910 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 215.00 Maintenance&Calibration of CTD Profiling Sensors 46911 Shortidge Instruments,Inc. 2,T75.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46912 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 33.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46913 SoftChoice 203.65 Software Maintenance Contract Services 46914 Solder Sutton One Inc. 274.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46915 Sparing Inst.do Patten Corporate 2.672.71 Magnetic Flow Meter 46916 Summit Steel 419.17 Metal 46917 Sunset Industrial Parts 257.25 Mechanical Supplies 46918 SPX Valves&Control 9.083.58 Valves&Mechanical Parts 46919 Techno Coatings 9,908.00 Coaling Repairs-Low Pressure Digester Gas Holder Tank at Pit.2 46920 Telelrec, Inc. 245.00 Airtime Services&Sofwlafe/HerdWafe Maintenance 46921 Thermo Elemental 820.00 Software Installation&Data Transfer Services 46922 Thermo Fomo, Inc. 2.716.05 Lab Instrument Warranty Extension 46923 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,066.23 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46924 ThyssenKropp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 46925 Todd Anderson 3,390.00 Professional Services J-85 46926 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 21.69 Locks&Keys 46927 Tran Consulting Engineers 6,486.00 Engineering Services J-66 46928 Transcat 2,066.19 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46929 Tri-Stale Seminar On-the-River 360.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 46930 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. 47.32 Automotive Parts&Supplies 46931 Teksystems 4.642-00 Temporary Employment Services 46932 US Filter Corporation 1,216.82 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 46933 Utre Scientific 308.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 46934 United Parcel Service 532A9 Parcel Services '46935 Defense Finance and Accounting 19,616.75 Professional Services J-86 46936 Unocal 76 9,309.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 6 or 7 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 08/16/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46937 U-Line 189.42 Office Supplies 46938 Vallen Safety Supply Company 91.14 Safety Supplies 46939 Vallech Energy Management 450.00 Consulting Services-Natural Gas 46940 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 11,688.00 Temporary Employment Service 46941 Vedzon California 638.38 Telephone Services 46942 Vortex Corp. 2,363.00 Door Repair 46943 V L Systems.Inc. 13,156.81 Software Upgrade 46944 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 5.118.05 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 46945 The Wackenhut Corporation 13.015.55 Security Guards 46946 Water Environment Federation 112.00 Membership 46947 Waxie Sanitary Supply 464.79 Janitorial Supplies 46948 Weber Scientific 1.465.02 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 46949 Westbay Solutions Group 2,500.00 Technical Services Training Registration 46950 Westport Aperetus DBA Breaker Supply 65.31 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 46951 Wilhelm Electric Co.,Inc. 956.00 Construction-Potholing for Underground Fibemptic Line at Ph. 1 46952 W EFTEC 2002 do Expoexchange 945.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 46953 WQI 350.00 O 8 M Training Registration 46954 Xerox Corporation 954.72 Fax 8 Copier Leases 46955 York International 326.94 Oil 46956 Zee Medical 154.78 First Aid Supplies 46957 California Bank 8 Trust 3,240.00 Construction J-33-1A.Retention 46958 Blake Anderson 230.50 Meeting/Tiaining Expense Reimbursement 46959 Norman Eckenrode 1,526.22 Meeling/Traming Expense Reimbursement 46960 Jerry F.Evangelista 50.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46961 Use Murphy 843.88 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement 46952 James W.Silva 423.32 Meeting/Treining Expense Reimbursement 46963 Mahin Talebi 1,143.23 Meeting/rmining Expense Reimbursement 46964 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 100.00 Annexation Permit Fees 46965 Local Agency Formation Commission 350.00 Annexation Permit Fees 46966 Ludwin,David 1,758.74 Employee Computer Loan Program 46967 Stale of California 154.00 Annexation Pemdt Fees Total Accounts Payable-Warrants 9 6,196,763.95 Payroll Disbursements 27460-27564 Employee Paychecks $ 159.440.44 Bhveekly Payroll 0821102 27565-27565 Interim Paycheck 319.38 Reimbursement for Discontinued Withholding 75970-76433 Direct Deposit Statements 828.031.70 Biweekly Payroll 0821/02 Total Payroll Disbursements 987,791.52 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of CA,N.A. $ 372.622.44 August Interest Payment on Series 2000 Cani6cates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments S 372,622.44 Total Claims Paid 03116102.8131102 $ 7,557,167.91 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT 0 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mmbng Date Toed.orar. tD/z3/Dz AGENDA REPORT ltem Number Rem NumW e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant - SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 1 ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 09/01/02—09/15/02 and 09/16/02—09/30/02 Claims Paid From 09/O1/02 to 09/15102 e Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 46968 Orange County Sanitation District $ 523,593.16 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 46969 Southern California Edison 88,743.00 Power 46970 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 205.14 Mechanical Supplies 46971 American Training Resources,Inc. 1.074.62 Training Materials 46972 AT&T Universal Biller 2,891.15 Telephone Service 46973 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 20.13 Telephone Service 46974 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,744.74 Cellular Telephone Service 46975 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 46976 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 46977 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1.877,92 Plumbing Supplies 46978 Pacific West Printing&Promotions 1,437.98 Community Outreach Supplies 46979 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 8.321.31 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 46980 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 46981 Five Star Metals,Inc. 329.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46982 Gmybar 1,705.48 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46983 City of Huntington Beach 27.98 Water Use 46984 Industrial Metal Supply 745.07 Metal 46985 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 556.81 Fasteners 46986 Ingoglia,Lod 600.00 Professional Services-Community Outreach 46987 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 3,193.98 Dues Deduction 46988 Law/Crandall 50.00 Construction-Masonry Wall 46989 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 189.45 Electrical Supplies 46990 National Bond&Trust 1,133.47 U.S.Savings Bonds 46991 National Fire Protection Association 115.00 Membership 46992 National Safely Council 515.00 Membership 46993 Fred J.O'Brian 150.00 Compliance Training Registration 46994 Operation Technology,Inc. 2,720.47 Software Maintenance 46995 Orange County Sheriff 45.00 Wage Garnishment 46996 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 602.55 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46997 OCEA 478.36 Dues Deduction 46998 Pacific Bell 35.57 Telephone Services 46999 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 47000 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 47001 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,071.00 Dues Deduction 47002 Prodata 240.00 Software Maint. 47003 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 508.92 Paint Supplies 47004 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 432.34 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 47005 Court Order 721.50 Wage Gamishmenl 47006 Sparkletts 2,081.23 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 47007 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 81.00 Safely&Health Training Registration&Air Quality Meeting Registration 47008 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 47009 Vedzon California 30.28 Telephone Services 47010 James D.Herberg 109.67 Meeting7freining Expense Reimbursement 47011 Andrei loan 694.56 Meelingrimining Expense Reimbursement 47012 Penny M.Kyle 853.12 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement Page 1 of 8 E%HIBITA Claims Paid From 09/01/02 to 09/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47013 Hal Nguyen 420.63 MeelingRraining Expense Reimbursement 47014 Donald W.Ragan 577.40 Meetirgrrraining Expense Reimbursement 47015 Henry R.Salgado 664.69 Meelingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 47016 Armstrong,John or Barbara 1.203.03 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47017 Sagnall,Janet 783.55 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47018 Britain,Jerry L. 783.55 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47019 Brown,Russell W. 783.55 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47020 Byrd,Bobby 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47021 Dulm,Albert R. 783.55 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47022 K.Faulk 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47023 Green,Garret or Sabrina 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47024 Great.Gary 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47025 Hamilton,James R. 783.55 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47026 Hlmmatsu, Elena 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47027 Hughes,William 182,37 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47028 Johnson,Marc 783.65 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47029 Kalb,David George 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47030 1165 W.Valley View Drive 1,203.03 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47031 Magdalen,Thomas 156.34 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47032 Mahn,John 1.203.03 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47033 Metoyer, Robert or Karin 161.57 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47034 Milano,Lawrence 16237 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47035 Page,Gordon 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47036 Parties,David 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47037 Powell,Lorraine 1,203.03 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47038 Radek,Scott or Anna 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47039 Ritter,Maurice 161.57 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47040 Roper,Harold 505.49 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47041 San Roman,Cepedna 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47042 Sorensen, Harold F. 783.55 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47043 Tantardini,Janice L. 1,250.64 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47044 Walker,Tommy 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47045 Walker,William 161.57 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47046 Wells,Martha 2,228.04 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47047 Withers,Newton 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47048 Zimmerman,Mark 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 47049 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 47050 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fee 47051 Black 6 Veatch Corporation 487.956.04 Engineering Services J-87,P2-85 8 P1-76 47052 Brown B Caldwell 58,117.53 Engineering Services 1-98 47053 BP Energy Company 131,864.63 Natural Gas 47054 Carollo Engineers 377,525.69 Professional Services P2-66,J-39 8 Microfiltralion Demo.Scale Project 47055 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 60,986.18 Property Attribute Processing&Communication Charges 47056 CH2M HIII 67,121.26 Professional Services J40.6 47057 Clint Specialty Chemicals Corporation 28.099.47 Chemicals 47058 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 70,032.26 (10)Computers,(8)Monitors,(1)Server 8 Misc.Hardware Page 2 of EXHIBIT ` Claims Paid From 09/01/02 to 09/15/02 V Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47059 Delta Dental 48.724.78 Dental Insurance Plan 47060 J R Filax Construction 63.654.35 Construction-Install/Replace Caustic Tank&Piping at Pit. 1 Head"do, 47061 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 40,126.41 Medical Insurance Premium 47062 Kemimn Pacific,Inc. 136,563.31 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 47063 Montgomery Watson 57.240.00 Professional Service-Evaluation of Anaerobic Baf0ed Reactor 47064 Orange County Sanitation District 40,063.55 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 47065 Orange County Water District 397.461.31 GWRS Jam Project-J-36 47066 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 119,826.00 Caustic Soda&Sodium Hyllochlorile 47067 Projects Partners 37,120.03 Temporary Employment Services 47068 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 41,400.00 Construction-Manhole Repairs 47069 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 83,055.97 Professional Services J-85 47070 U.S.Peroxide 62.400.20 Hydrogen Peroxide 47071 The Yakima Company 27.577.97 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 47072 Mike Pnich&Sons 282,275.90 Construction-Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sawer 47073 ATint of Glass 121.95 Window Tinting 47074 Acroprint Time Recorder Company 92.78 Repair of Time Recorder 47075 Aigas Safety 2.739.09 Safety Supplies 47076 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 722.23 Instrument Supplies 47077 American Airlines 3,979.50 Travel Services 47078 Steve Anderson 653.00 Meeting/fmhring Expense Reimbursement 47079 Arch Wireless 2.442.99 Pagers,Service&Airtime 47080 Arizona Instrument 13,403.31 (1)Meter 47081 Ashbrook Corporation 1,489.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47082 Ashlead Technology Rentals 341.30 Equipment Lease 47083 Association for Facilities Engineering 165.00 Membership 47094 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin. Bldg.Atrium 47085 ACS Hydraulics,Inc. 868.56 Mechanical Repairs 47086 ARB/PERP-Air Resources Board 630.00 Permit Fee 47087 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 131.70 Telephone Service 47088 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 4TO89 Baker Tanks 9,247.89 (7)6.500 Gal.Poly Tank Rentals 47090 Basic Chemical Solutions 23,060.06 Chemicals 47091 Battery Specialties 921.87 Batteries 47092 Bell Land Surveying 9,577.50 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Pmjects 47093 Burke Engineering Co. 1,906.10 Electrical Supplies 47094 Bush&Associates,Inc. 8,456.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 47095 C.S.U.F.Foundation 10,031.25 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 47096 Calff mia Automatic Gale 678.15 Service Agreement 47097 Caltlomia Banicede Rentals 1.875.00 Bamcede Rentals 47098 California Industrial Supplies' 487.79 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47099 Callrol,Inc. 4,804.58 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47100 Cashco,Inc.,clo Penton Ind.,Inc. 395.27 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47101 CeI12Cell 9,664.89 Communication Equipment 47102 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,673.55 Check Valve 47103 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 496.33 Lab Parts&Supplies 47104 Communications Performance Group.Inc. 13,ODO.OD Professional Services-Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 09101/02 to 09/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47105 Communications Supply Corp. 721.36 Computer Hardware 47106 Compressor Components of California 2.496.00 Coll Reconditioning,Testing&Rebuild Services 47107 Computer Sciences Corp. 6.783.99 Consulting&Lab Services-Assay Pilot Project 47108 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 431.63 Electrical Supplies 47109 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 8.35 Freight 47110 Conveyor Components Co. 609.65 Electical Parts&Supplies 47111 Cooper Energy Services 13728 Engine Supplies 47112 Cooper Energy Systems 2,365.40 Cylinder Head Reconditioning 47113 Corporate Express Imaging 78.37 Computer Supplies 47114 Corporate Express 2.835.65 Office Supplies 47115 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 4.979.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47116 County of Orange(PFRD Geomatim) 66.00 Encroachment Permit 47117 County Wholesale Electric Co. 850.53 Electrical Parts It Supplies 47118 Crane America Services,Inc. 7.07.56 Crane Services 47119 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Maint.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener System 47120 COP Industries 10,103.96 Janitorial Supplies 47121 CEM Corporation 809.96 Lab Parts&Supplies 47122 CEPA Company 1,405.00 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 47123 CR&R.Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals 47124 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 1,500.00 Lab Analysis 47125 CUEA 1,000.00 Membership 47126 Daniel Company,L.L.C. 5,385.35 Belt Press Inspection&Parts 47127 David's Tree Service 8,210.00 Tree Maint.Service 47128 Davis Instruments 396.06 Instrument Parts&Supplies 47129 Del Mar Analytical 2.2N.00 Siosolids Analysis 47130 Dresser Measurement&Controls-Masonetla 3,014.82 Instrument Paris&Supplies 47131 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 271.67 Paint Supplies 47132 Edwin M.Perkins 8,810.30 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance 47133 Enchanter,Inc. 2.700.00 Organ Monitoring MO 5.24-95 47134 Environmental Resource Association/ERA 1,377.65 Lab Parts&Supplies 47135 ENRG 13.04 Maint.Services-Compressed Natural Gas Station Pit. 1 47136 FedEx Corporation 235.55 Air Freight 47137 Filter Supply Company 208.58 Filters 47138 First American Real Estate Solutions 326.35 Orange County Property Information 47139 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 8.701.66 Lab Paris&Supplies 47140 Foodcmft Coffee&ReGeshment Services 451.72 Meeting Supplies 47141 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 19,986.82 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 47142 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 83729 Truck Wash Tickets 47143 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 213.19 Paint Supplies 47144 Franklin Covey 312.36 Office Supplies 47145 Fys Electronics 86.09 Computer Supplies 47146 Full Spectrum Analytics 581.55 Lab Instrument Repairs 47147 Gartner Group 24.340.00 Software Consulting 47148 General Petroleum 12,401.47 Unleaded Gasoline 47149 George T.Hall 1.480.70 Instrument Parts&Supplies 47150 Gotoemvest Window Service 2.462.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990015 Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT A + Claims Paid From 09/01/02 to 09/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47151 Good ay Technologies Corp. 279.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47152 W W Grainger,Inc. 9.198.16 Instrument Parts&Supplies 47153 Graybar 1,852.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47154 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 196.02 Janitorial Supplies 47155 Hach do Penton Industries 153.91 Lab Parts&Supplies 47156 Harold Primrose Ica 111.00 Ice For Samples 47157 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 298.74 Engine Generator Control Supplies 47158 Heat Technology Products 2.545.00 Mechanical Parts.Supplies&Repairs 47159 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 79.00 Meeting Expenses 47160 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 55.82 O6ice Furniture 47161 High Impact Training 4,200.00 Operator Safety Training 47162 Hilo, Inc. 965.66 Tools 47163 Hoerbiger Service,Inc. 1,121.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47164 The Holman Group 715.68 Employee Assistance Program Premium 47165 Home Depot 298.28 Small Hardware 47166 Hub Auto Supply 65.22 Automotive Parts&Supplies 47167 Imaging Express 323.44 Printer Maintenance 47168 Industrial Distribution Group 3,463.45 Tools&Mechanical Supplies 47169 Oak Fabco/lndustrlal Steam 195.66 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47170 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 2,871.49 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 47171 Roto Rooter 3,100.00 CCTV Vdedig of Trunkline Sewers 47172 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 253.71 Lab Parts&Supplies 47173 Integra Biosciences,Inc. 110.88 Lab Parts&Supplies 47174 Intratek Computer,Inc. 3,300.00 Network&Server Maintenance 47175 Invensys Systems, Inc. 1,442.91 Instrument Supplies 47176 Ionics Instrument Business Group 65.75 Lab Parts&Supplies 47177 IDMS: Imaging Document Mgml.Solutions 1.608.08 Professional Services J-25.1 47178 IECOC 30.00 Communications Meeting Registration 47179 J&L Industrial Supply 495.32 Maintenance Material 47180 J E Meinhard Associates 837.68 Lab Parts&Supplies 47181 Jays Catering 2,083.79 Meeting Expenses 47182 Johnstone Supply 400.24 Electrical Supplies 47183 JWC Environmental 7,531.73 Repairs&Maintenance Service-Muffin Monster 47184 K.P.Lindstrom, Inc. 9,810.85 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9.90 47185 Ken Thompson,Inc. 1,500.00 Construction-Warner Ave.Potholing 47186 Kings County Farm Bureau 175.00 Membership 47187 KL&P Marketing 049.07 Safety Incentive Items 47188 Lae&Ro,Inc. 6.908.31 Professional Services J-71-7 47189 Lens-Neils 82.23 Books&Publications 47190 Linjer Company do Gerald Jbnes 4,572.14 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 47191 Luccifs 424.67 Meeting Expense 47192 Management Technologies 1.875.00 Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit 47193 Mc Junkin Corp 646.50 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 47194 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 624.53 Mechanical&Lab Pans&Supplies 47195 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 5,352,46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47196 Mac Analytical System 8,390.37 Professional Services J-85 Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 09/01/02 to 09/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47197 Media Clips,Inc. 350.00 Notices&Ads 47198 Medlin Controls Co. 1,907.51 Instrument Supplies 47199 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 7215.93 Mechanical Parts&Repairs 47200 Mission Unform Service 4,018.30 Uniform Rentals 47201 Mitchell Instrument Co. 1,%8.00 Instruments 47202 MOB Consulting 12,313.14 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 47203 National Plant Services, Inc. 660.00 Vacuum Truck Services 47204 Neal Supply Co. 199.83 Plumbing Supplies 47205 Network Catalyst, Inc. 15,553.25 Computer Software/Hardware 47206 NelVersant of Southern California 4,016.43 Main[.Services-Access Control&CCTV System 47207 Newark Electronics 34.59 Instrument Supplies 47208 Nicholas Chevrolet 23.861.93 (1)Chevrolet Silvemdo Why Tnmk 47209 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 200.33 Lubricant 47210 North American Crone Bureau,Inc. 4.820.00 Overhead Crane Operator Training 47211 Nu Way Laser Engraving 1,992.55 Steel Tags 47212 Office Depot Business Services Div. 820.86 Office Supplies 47213 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 565.47 Janitorial Supplies 47214 Orange County Hose Company 33.31 Hose Supplies 47215 Orange County Vector Control District 6,679.55 Past Control 47216 Oxygen Service Company 1.796.35 Lab Specialty Gases 47217 OCB Reprographics 1.633.73 Printing Service-MO 1126100 47218 P.L. Hawn Company,Inc. 779.69 A/C Air Filters 47219 Pace Analytic Services 975.00 Lab Analyses of Wastewater&Biosoltos 47220 Pacific Bell 15.80 Telephone Services 47221 Pacific Ford 19.662.45 (1)2002 Ford F-150 Pick-Up Tricks 47222 Pacific High Reach,Inc. 3,068.70 Aerial Lift Rental 47223 Pack Mechanical Supply 9,279.26 Plumbing Supplies 47224 Pacific Parts&Controls 3,953.05 Electrical Supplies 47225 Parker Hannifin Corporation 113.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47226 Parker Supply Company 530.19 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47227 Parkhouse Tire Co. 1,350.83 Tires 47228 Partners Consulting Services 7,260.00 Help Desk Consulting Services 47229 Parts Unlimited 135.57 Automotive Parts&Supplies 47230 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 692.44 Instrument Repairs 47231 Ponton Industries,Inc. 1.250.00 Density Meter Training 47232 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 538.20 Employee Legal Service Insurence Premium 47233 Precise Sensor, Inc. 1,080.94 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47234 Professional Publications, Inc. 110.85 Publication 47235 Public Utilities Commission 12.28 Publication 47236 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 1.924.93 Pumps 47237 PURmelster 327.63 Electrical Supplies 47238 Pyramid Fence Company,Inc. 1,346.00 Fencing Installation 47239 R.L.Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kam County Biosolids Consulting Services 47240 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2.126.12 Trash Removal 47241 Rainin Instrument Co.,Inc. 1.095.20 Lab Parts&Supplies 47242 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,300.08 Employee Life Ins.,Short-Term Disability&Cancer In.Payroll Deductions Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 09/01/02 to 09/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47243 Rosen Electrical 17.651.00 Electrical Repairs&Installation at Pourer Bldg.B 47244 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 4,921.50 Engineering Services-Basin M Structural Repairs 47245 RPM Electric Motors 2,403.57 Motor Repairs 47246 Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp 833.36 Lab Parts&Supplies 47247 Schneider Automation,Inc. 1,998.77 Software Maint Agreement 47248 Schwing America,Inc. 377.75 Pump Supplies 47249 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 19.72 Demurrage Charges 47250 Shuraluck Sales&Engineering 56,139 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47251 Sigma Chemical Co. 7,303.11 Lab Paris&Supplies 47252 So.Cal.Gas Company 22335.91 Natural Gas 47253 SoftView Computer Products 658.57 Once Supplies 47254 SoDChoice 23.843.66 Software 47255 Sou0rem California Edison 12,60271 Power 47256 Southern California Water 71.77 Water Use 47257 Standey Steamer Intemational,Inc. 35200 Carpet Cleaning Services 47258 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 235.32 Office Supplies 47259 Straughan Technical Distribution,L.L.C. 525.27 Pump Supplies 47260 Sunset Industrial Parts 103.32 Mechanical Supplies 47261 SCAP 6.000.00 OCSD Share of Kern County Litigation Fund 47262 SCP Science 429.00 Lab Paris&Supplies 47263 SKC-West, Inc. 892.39 Safety Supplies 47264 Technical Training Group,Inc. 1,950.00 Engineering Training Registration 47265 Tarmmix International Co.02474 600.00 Past Control 47266 Tetra Tech,Inc. 17.035.31 Prof.Services-Ocean Monitoring,Plume Modeling&7-37 47267 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3,890.15 Mechanical Supplies 47268 Time Warder Communication 40.47 Cable Services 47269 Torr/s Lock&Safe Service&Sales 130.44 Locks&Keys 47270 Tort Aire, Inc. 1,055.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47271 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 51.00 O&M Training Registration 47272 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 9,840.33 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 47273 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 578.87 Automotive Supplies 47274 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 50.00 lab Services 47275 Trusco Manufacturing Company 96.40 Painting Supplies 47276 Turblex,Inc. 14,079.30 Repairs&Maintenance Service-Turblex Blowers 47277 Tustin Dodge 256.88 Truck Pars&Supplies 47273 U.S.Matra Group,Inc. 13,600.02 Janitorial&Floe Maintenance at Plans 1 &2 47279 United Parcel Service 94.25 Parcel Services 47280 Valve Automation&Controls 725.91 Valves 47281 Vapex, Inc. 4,348.00 Software/Hardware for Vapex Trunkline Project 47282 Varian Associates,Inc. 235.25 lab Parts&Supplies 47283 Verizon California 4.153.89 Telephone Services 47284 Verde's Plumbing 5,806.90 Service Contract-Testing&Cart Backflow Devices at Pls. 1 &2&Pump Sta. 47285 Vision Service Plan 7,483.32 Vision Service Premium 47286 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 6,201.57 Lab Parts&Supplies 47287 The Wackenhut Corporation 4,333.31 Security Guards 47288 Waco Filter 567.47 Filters Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 09/01/02 to 09/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47289 Waste Markets Corp. 24,298.81 Mainl.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mal'I.Removal 47290 Water Systems Cleaning Co. 560.00 Repair Services-Scrubber J at Pit.2 47291 Waxie Sanitary Supply 155.64 Janitorial Supplies 47292 Weber Scientific 177.78 Lab Supplies 47293 Wesco Distribution,Inc. 3.199.41 Instrument Supplies 47294 Arthur Wolfson Ph.D 6,767.80 Professional Services-NPDES Permit Renewal 47295 WEF 224.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 47296 WOt 350.00 O&M Training Registration 47297 Xerox Corporation 15,453.23 Fax&Copier Leases 47298 Zee Medical 1,623.54 Safety Supplies 47299 R.Fox Construction, Inc. 22.437.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Pit. 1 47300 Patrick B.Carnahan 469.63 Meeling/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 47301 James W.Matte 282.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47302 Douglas M.Stewart 410.29 MeetirgRmining Expense Reimbursement 47303 Robert J.Taylor 444.62 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 47304 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 840.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 47305 Gibson,Larry 630.33 Employee Computer Loan Program 47306 McReynolds,Roland&Dell Comp Corp 2,968.16 Employee Computer Loan Program 47307 Stull,Mike&COmPUSA 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,219,414.66 Payroll Disbursements 27566-27663 Employee Paychecks $ 148.106.65 27664-27664 Interim Paycheck 285.96 76464-76900 Direct Deposit Statements 808,015.91 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 958,408.52 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 49,786.25 August Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 114,345.89 Societe Generale August Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 164,132.14 Total Claims Paid 09/01/02-09/15102 $ 5,338,955.32 Page 8of8 EXHIBIT} �� Claims Paid From 09/16/02 to 09130/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Account Pavable-Warrants 47308 Moreland&Associates 6 28.687.90 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 47309 Orange County Sanitation District 543,992.74 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 47310 Southern California Edison 70.901.98 Power 47311 Alrgas Safety 1,531.63 Safety Supplies 47312 Amedcan Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 15.24 Telephone Service 47313 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 47314 California&the World Ocean'02 265.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 47315 Copelco Capital.Inc. 2,564.40 Color Printer/Color Copier System Lease 47316 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 47317 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 95.18 Electrical Supplies 47318 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 37.30 Encroachment Permit 47319 County of Santa Clara 250.00 Source Control Training Registration 47320 Cytec Industries 15,042.30 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 47321 Dawson Company 94.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47322 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 148.74 Paint Supplies 47323 Norman Eckenrode 380.14 Meeting7raining Expense Reimbursement 47324 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 8,321.31 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 47325 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 47326 Franklin Covey 152.57 Office Supplies 47327 Intl. Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,260.67 Dues Deduction 47328 Irvine Ranch Water District 33.00 Water Use 47329 J.D.Edwards 1,500.00 Information Techrwlogy Training Registration 47330 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 7,776.84 Construction-Leak Repairs at Plant 1 Old Headworks 47331 Kent Automotive 648.05 Automotive Parts&Supplies 47332 League Of CA Cities 223.87 OCSD Share of Orange County Leadership Symposium 47333 Lifecom-Safety.Inc. 317.95 Instrument Parts&Supplies 47334 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 576.57 Mechanical Supplies&Tank 47335 National Bond&Trust 1,156.65 U.S.Saving Bonds 47336 Oracle Corp 5,317.91 Software Maintenance 47337 Orange County Sheriff 45.00 Wage Garnishment 47338 OCFA 478.36 Dues Deduction 47339 Pacific Bell 51.64 Telephone Services 47340 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 47341 Partners Consulting Services 20.400.00 Help Desk Consulting Services 47342 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 47343 Peace Officers Council of CA 1.080.00 Dues Deduction 47344 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 4,166.48 Sewedine Cleaning-Various Locations 47345 Seaside Ranchos 3,462.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47346 Shuraluck Sales&Engineering 25.47 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 47347 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 47348 Snap On Industrial 784.26 Tools 47349 So.Cal.Gas Company 624.37 Natural Gas 47350 Southern California Edison 32.99 Power 47351 SAWPA 5.000.00 OCSD Share of Westeload Allocation,Nitrogen TDS Study,Phase 2 47352 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 3,424.98 Mechanical Supplies Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 09/16/02 to 09/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47353 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 50.00 O&M Meeting Registration 47354 Union Oil Company of California 9,309.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 47355 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 47356 Verizon California 27.73 Telephone Services 47357 Vortex Industries,Inc. 471.00 Door Repair 47358 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 483.25 Meedngrimining Expense Reimbursement 47359 Michael D.Moore 138.98 Meetingfl-raining Expense Reimbursement 47360 Robert Oaten 787.96 MeelingRraining Expense Reimbursement 47361 Wendy T.Sevenandt 681.02 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimbursement 47362 Phillip J.Sullivan 693.05 Meeting/7raining Expense Reimbursement 47363 City of Tustin 5.000.00 Plan Check Fee-Gisler-Rehill Trunk Improvements(7-36) 47364 CMAA 170.00 Engineering Meeting Registration 47365 Jays Catering 3,177.61 Meeting Expenses 47366 American Express 36,558.67 Purchasing Card Program.Misc.Supplies&Services 47367 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 125,396.99 Professional Services J-73-2 47368 Basic Chemical Solutions 30,027.01 Chemicals 47369 Black&Veatch Corporation 175,248.05 Engineering Services J-77 47370 Blue Cross of California 264.921.16 Medical Insurance Premium 47371 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 32,362.00 Engineering Services J-40-8 47372 Carollo Engineers 62.088.72 Professional Services J-39&P2-60 47373 CGvL Engineers 30,265.24 Professional Services P2-82&Pi-94 47374 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 98,821.00 Painting Malnl.Services MO 4-22-98 47375 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 59,000.00 Professional Services-FOG Control Study(Fats,Oils,Grease) 47376 Fluor Enterprises,Inc. 34.200.00 Professional Services-Space Allocation 47377 Fords Benefits Insurance Company 40,460.76 Long&Short-Term Disability Ins.Premiums 47378 City of Huntington Beach 29,788.64 Water Use 47379 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. 138,502.74 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 47300 Lee&Ro, Inc. 40,930.41 Professional Services P2-47-3 47381 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 33,635.81 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 47382 Orange County Water District 459,091.50 Joint GW RS Project J-36 47383 Palnewebber Incorporated 40,104.06 COP Remarketing Agreement 47384 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 104,657.33 Engineering Sew ices J-42&J-35-2 47385 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 222,792.15 Caustic Soda 47386 Projects Partners 48.309.47 Temporary Employment Services 47387 City of Seal Beach 224.217.36 Cooperative Project-Sevrer Mains Reconstruction(CP-0020) 47388 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 37,645.55 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc. Fees 47389 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 235,881.09 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 47390 U.S.Peroxide 127,966.29 Prof.Svcs.-Chemicals&Coll.Sys.Odor&Can.Control Add.Demo.Study 47391 UCI Regents 25,342.94 Professional Services J-85 47392 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 29,680.00 Temporary Employment Service 47393 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 107,448.42 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 47394 The Yakima Company 26,832.49 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 47395 California Bank&Trust 89,376.00 Construction J-33-IA,Retention 47396 CormdIt Pacific Company 710,572.OD Construction J-39 47397 EI9er Constructors,Inc. 123,874.23 Construction 3-25 47398 J W Contracting Corporation 347.589.00 Construction P2-60 - Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT B e Claims Paid From 09/16/02 to 09/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47399 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,176,9D0.00 Construction P2.39,J-71-7&P1-37 47400 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 31.263.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Pit 1,Retention 47401 Southern Contracting Company 804,390.00 Construction J-33-1A 47402 Union Bank of California 41.732.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 47403 American Telephone Corp. 86.28 Long Distance Telephone Service 47404 Accent Flag&Sign 2.694.59 Flag Pole.Parts.Repairs&Installation 47405 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 2,722.50 Professional Services-Can Gen Engines 47406 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 2,368.58 Ins.Parts&Supplies 47407 Air Cold Supply.A Ferguson Enterprise 481.51 Air Conditioner Supplies 47408 Airgas Safety 553.54 Safety Supplies&Equipment 47409 Amercan Computer&Communications,Inc. 159.00 Teleprinter Maintenance Agreement 47410 Amrican Air Filter,Inc. 1.466.64 Filler 47411 Appleone Employment Service 8,507.69 Temporary Employment Services 47412 Atha num of the Pacific 436.50 Reimbursable Employee Activity Expense 47413 Arch Wireless 2.096.61 Pagers,Service&Airtime 47414 Aspen Publishers.Inc. 238.16 Subscription 47415 American Assoc for the Advanc.Of Science 99.00 Membership 47416 AT&T Wireless Services 9.309.35 Wireless Phone Services 47417 Ballantyne,Inc. 13,920.00 Temporary Employment Services 47418 Bar Tech Telecom.Inc. 800.32 Telephone Equipment 47419 Battery Specialties 614.43 Batteries 47420 BioMedeux Vitek,Inc. 1,129.78 Lab Supplies 47421 Boyle Engineering Corporation 4.198.52 Engineering Services 7-23.1 47422 Bush&Associates,Inc. 9.074.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 47423 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 346.04 Posts 47424 Calif Centrifugal Pump 24,021.15 Rebuild Turbine Pump 47425 California Barricade Rentals 2,250.00 Barricades 47426 California Relocation Services,Inc. 160.75 Office Moving Services 47427 Caltrol,Inc. 823.43 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47428 Carleton Engineers&Consultants,Inc. 951.50 Engineering Services-SCAQMD Air Quality Compliance 47429 Cashoo.Inc.,No Ponton Ind., Inc. 235.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47430 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 5,478.09 Engineering Services-Anaerobic Selector Study 47431 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1,282.20 Color Printer/Copper System Lease 47432 City of Fountain Valley 18,994.44 Water Use 47433 Coast Fire Equipment 577.54 Fire Extinguishers 47434 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 23,809.38 Computer Mainz.Agreement 47435 Computer Sciences Corp. 13,855.77 ConsuBing&Lab Services.Assay Pilot Project 47436 Consolidated Elect Distributors,Inc. 97.80 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 47437 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 684.57 Plumbing Supplies 47438 Cooper Energy Services 1.004.24 Engine Supplies 47439 Corporate Express Imaging 362.04 Computer Supplies 47440 Corporate Express 1,228.53 Office Supplies 47"1 Coriech Engineering 222.83 Freight 47442 Cost Containment Solutions 1.266.41 Worker's Comp.Services 47443 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 85.54 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 47444 County of Orange(PFRD Geoma6cs) 2.002.80 Parcel Maps Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 09/16/02 to 09/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47445 County of Orange-Auditw Controller 3,017.53 Maint.Agreement-Repair, Installation of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios 47446 County Wholesale Electric Co. 903.43 Electricat Parts&Supplies 47447 Crane America Services, Inc. 2.500.D0 Crane Services 47448 CEM Corporation 529.74 Lab Supplies 47449 CH2MHill 11,572.64 Engineering Services-J-87 47450 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 4,066.06 Chemicals 47451 CR&R,Inc. 2.520.00 Container Rentals 47452 CWEA 784.84 Publications 47453 David's Tree Service 4.400.00 Tree Maim.Service 47454 Demos,Inc. 1.404.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47455 Detection Instruments Corporation 8,105.00 Ins.Parts&Supplies 47456 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 376.59 Electrical Supplies 47457 Edward S.Babcock&Sons, Inc. 5,720.00 Lab Analyses-J-85 47458 Electra-Bond,Inc. 996.69 Epoxy Coating 47459 Enchanter, Inc. 4.700.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 47460 Environmental Resource Association 527.90 Lab Pans&Supplies 47461 Filarsky&Wad,L.L.P. 3,847.50 Professional Services-SPMT Negotiations&Other Misc. Services 47462 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 5.889.48 Lab Parts&Supplies 47463 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 1,187.67 Truck Wash Tickets 47464 Fountain Valley Paints.Inc. 130.11 Pand Supplies 47465 Frederick Pump&Engineering 5,41244 Pump Assembly 47466 Frost Engineering Service Co. 978.66 Inst.Parts&Supplies 47467 FST Sand and Gravel.Inc. 379.97 Road Base Materials 47468 FonraTronicaRichards Capital Corporation 1.956.94 Stationery&Office Supplies 47469 George Yardley Co. 212.48 Instrument Supplies 47470 Gierfich-Mitchell,Inc. 1.202.23 Pump Parts&Supplies 47471 W W Grainger,Inc. 835.17 FJectrical Parts&Supplies 47472 Graybar 219.25 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47473 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 85.21 Janitorial Supplies 47474 Westmark Sales, Inc. 1,254.19 Instrument Supplies 47475 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems 58.28 Ink 47476 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 1,492.31 Engine Generator Control Supplies 47477 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 80.68 Meeting Expenses 47478 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 1,992.05 Furniture&Fixtures 47479 HIII Brothers 19,595.69 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Tmnkline 47480 Milli,Inc. 588.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47481 The Holman Group 724.20 Employee Assistance Program Premium 47482 Home Depot 516.17 Small Hardware 47493 Hub Auto Supply 162.23 Automotive Parts&Supplies 47484 Imaging Plus, Inc. 4,112.75 Printing Service 47485 Industrial Distribution Group 171.35 Mechanical Pans It Supplies 47486 Industrial Networking Solutions 3,933.14 Computer Hardware/Software 47487 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 1,27520 Fasteners 47488 Interstate Battery Systems 403.63 Batteries 47489 Invensys Systems, Inc. 2.237.98 Instrument Supplies 47490 Iron Mountain 300.00 Storage Fee-Bid Documents P7-37&J-39 Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 09/16/02 to 09/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47491 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 212.71 OBsile Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 47492 Irvine Ranch Water District 23.35 Water Use 47493 law,Inc. 1,231.26 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 47494 ISA 1.101.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration 47495 J 8 L Industrial Supply 104.28 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 47496 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 1.789.33 Maintenance Services-Tripod Winch 47497 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 8,788.02 Easement Cleaning-District 7 47498 Jays Catering 157.32 Meeting Expenses 47499 Johnstone Supply 428.83 Mechanical 8 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 47500 Kforoe Professional Staffing 23,037.10 Temporary Employment Services 47501 Lab Safely Supply, Inc. 52.77 Lab Supplies 47502 Lab Support 3,272.75 Temporary Employment Services 47503 Law/Crandall 203.00 Professional Services P2-60 47504 Lexis-Nexis 101.57 Books&Publications 47505 Linjer Company do Gerald Jones 4,566.64 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 47506 Liquid Handling Systems 22.56 Pumping Supplies 47507 Luccl's 92.30 Meeting Expense 47508 M.J.Schiff 8 Associates,Inc. 5,170.08 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 47509 Management Technologies 5,670.00 Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit 47510 Mana6,Phelps 8 Phillips,L.L.P. 10.000.00 Strategic Planning 8 Advocacy 47511 MerVac Electronics 16.88 Electrical Pans 8 Supplies 47512 McJunkin Corporation SZ53 Plumbing Supplies 47513 McGarry Central 93.12 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 47514 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 139.14 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 47515 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 210.11 Mechanical Seal 47516 Media Clips,Inc. 105.00 Notices 8 Ads 47517 Media Resurfacing Systems,Inc. 200.00 Vehicle Maintenance 47518 Medlin Controls Co. 1,744.23 Instrument Supplies 47519 Michael's Roofing 200.00 Roofing Services 47520 Mission Uniform Service 4,057.12 Uniform Rentals 47521 Morton Salt 777.19 Salt 47522 MDS Consulting 4,800.00 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 47523 Nascc 21628 Lab Paris B Supplies 47524 National Plant Services,Inc. 2.000.00 Vacuum Truck Services 47525 Neal Supply Co. 329.29 Plumbing Supplies 47526 Nexlel Communications 3.990.90 Cellular Phones 8 Air Time 47527 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,906.66 Industrial Oil 47528 Ninyo 8 Moore Corporals Accounting 354.45 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 47529 NAFA,Inc. 415.00 Membership 47530 Office Depot Business Services Div. 578.56 Office Supplies 47531 Oracle Corp 2,976.07 Software Maintenance 47532 Orange County Winwaler Works 16.77 Plumbing Supplies 47533 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 236.00 Mechanical Parts S Supplies 47634 Oxygen Service Company 2.145.60 Lab Specialty Gases 47535 OCB Reprographics 456.98 Printing Service-MO 12&g0 47536 Pacific Bell 37.15 Telephone Services Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 09118102 to 09130/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47637 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.07 Internet Service 47538 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,210.81 Plumbing Supplies 47539 Pacific Parts&Controls 10,651.67 Electrical Parts&Supplies 47W Paragon Steel 556.64 Metal 47541 Parker Supply Company 2,736.00 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 47542 Patriot Video Productions 1,591.72 Video Services 47543 Pcubed 1,617.00 Installation&Configuration of Microsoft Project Server 47544 Hach No Ponton Industries 776.87 Lab Parts&Supplies 47545 Power Electra Supply Co.,Inc. 922.34 Electrical Supplies 47546 Primary Source 177.25 OfOce Furniture 47547 Pumping Solull".Inc. 1,400.81 Pump Supplies 47548 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 99.58 Instrument Supplies 47549 R.W.Back 13,832.02 Professional Services Pt-90 47550 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,300.12 Trash Removal 47551 Realllme Systems Corporation 22,410.00 Software Maintenance Agreement 475M University of California.Irvine 2.270.00 O&M Training Registration 47553 RighlAnswem,L.L.C. 10,700.00 Software Maintenance Agreement&License 47554 RBF Engineers 890.00 Engineering Services 2-24-1 47555 RPM Electric Motors 12.405.97 Motor Repairs 47556 San Diego Gas&Electric 390.00 O&M and Human Resources Training Registration 47557 Sears Industrial Sales 947.27 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47558 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 2,321.74 Safety Supplies 47559 Sigma Chemical Co. 3,640.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 47560 Smardan Supply Company 105.38 Plumbing Supplies 47561 Sparkletts 1,329.36 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 47562 Slate Chemical Mfg.CO. 316.56 Janitorial Supplies 47563 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 312.57 Stationery&Office Supplies 47564 Strata International,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 47565 Sunset Industrial Parts 179.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47566 Super Power Products 646.50 Janitorial Supplies 47567 SCAP 10,000.00 Air Emissions Testing Program -Blosolids Composting Facility 47568 SPX Valves&Control 4.886.17 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 47569 Teletrac, Inc. 245.00 Maintenance&Air Time Service Fees 47570 Tetra Tech,Inc. 13,777.09 Professional Services J-90 47571 Thermo Finnigan,L.L.C. 395.83 Lab Pans&Supplies 47572 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 8,016.95 Pump Supplies 47673 Tony's Lack&Safe Service&Sales 17.78 Locks&Keys 47574 The Training Clinic 699.00 Human Resources Training Registration 47575 Tran Consulting Engineers 7,954.00 Engineering Services 5-46 47676 Transcet 464.37 Generator 47577 Tn-County Sandblasting,Inc. 404.00 Graffiti Removal 47578 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 30.18 Automotive Supplies 47578 Teksystems 14,611.00 Temporary Employment Services 47580 US Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 47581 Ultra Scientific 78.21 Lab Paris&Supplies 47682 Vallen Safety Supply Company 3,556.37 Safety Supplies Page 6 of EXHIBIT �� Claims Paid From 09116/02 to 09/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 47583 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 3.056.05 Inst.&Electrical Parts&Supplies 47584 Vapex,Inc. 6,250.00 Maintenance&Support Services J-71-8 47585 Verson California 3.543.40 Telephone Services 47586 Veme's Plumbing 100.00 Service Contract-Testing&Can.Backfiow Devices at Pits. 1 &2&Pump Sta. 47587 Vortex Industries,Inc. 3,198.12 Door Repair 47588 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 3,957.33 Lab Parts&Supplies 47589 Walden&Associates 1,051.97 Professional Services-Big Canyon Trunk Sewer 47590 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 20,623.28 Engineering Service J-67 47591 Weber Scientific 197.71 Lab Supplies 47592 Westport Aparalus DBA Breaker Supply 23.71 Electrical Pans&Supplies 47593 Wilmington Instrument Co.,Inc. 611.50 Inst.Parts&Supplies 47594 Xerox Corporation 1,200.26 Fax Leases 47595 3E Company 13,035.00 Software Maintenance-MSDS Program 47596 Patrick B.Carnahan 299.84 Meefing7Training Expense Reimbursement 47597 Linda Losurdo 203.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47598 David A.Ludwin 1.248.73 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47599 Kathleen T.Millea 164.00 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 47600 Jagadish C.O ugantt 745.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47601 BalachaMrs P.Rao 745.00 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 47602 Matthew P. Smith 1,351.53 Meetingri mining Expense Reimbursement 47603 Lisa L.Tomko 385.85 Meeting7Tmining Expense Reimbursement 47604 Tadao G.Vilko 40.99 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 47605 Local Agency Formation Commission 300.00 Annexation Fees 47606 Stale of California 684.62 Application Fee&Staff Appreciation Day Expenses Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,600,566.62 Pavroll Disbursements 27665.27790 Employee Paychecks $ 169.600.96 Biweekly Payroll 09/18/02 27791 -27791 Interim Paycheck 2,020.97 Termination Paycheck 76901 -77373 Direct Deposit Statemems 835.147.31 Biweekly Payroll 09/18/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,006,769.24 Wire Transfer Pavments State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA, N.A. 6,018.34 September Interest Payment on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 6.018.34 Total Claims Paid 09/16102.9130/02 $ 8,613,354.20 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT 8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeang Date To Bd.of Dir. 10/23/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item 9 NUM (a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Matt Smith, Acting Chief Project Officer SUBJECT: SPECIFICATION NO. 9900-05 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100536-OB, issued to OCB Reprographics for Specification No. 9900-05, for an additional amount of$125,000, for a total amount not to exceed $225,000, providing for additional services. SUMMARY • Outside blueprinting, photocopying, and related services are used for the purposes of high-volume reproduction of engineering construction project plans for bidding, and various reports and binding services required during the year that cannot be performed as economically with the District's copying equipment. • Consolidating purchase of copy services and awarding an annual contract to a single vendor through the formal bidding process has resulted in a reduction of staff time, and paperwork in individual ordering and invoice processing for payment of these services each time they are required. • OCB Reprographics was awarded a one-year contract by the Board of Directors on January 26, 2000, for a gross annual amount not to exceed $100,000 for all services bid under Specification No. 9900-05, with an option to renew up to four, one-year extensions. • This change order will not increase the unit rates that are in the original contract. • In addition to the regular copying services, the District has begun using OCB Reprographics to scan and index documents to be loaded into the Electronic Document Management System (EDMS). The original contract did not include the scanning and indexing of documents as a regular service, however it has proven to be an efficient method to complete this work. • Based on the anticipated number of projects for the remainder of 2002, which includes the scanning and indexing of documents for EDMS, staff recommends that the Blanket P.O. be increased by $125,000 to cover the cost of services through January 31, 2003. This is a one-time increase in the Blanket P.O. amount for this year's contract. These funds will be used only on an as-needed basis. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The contract for reprographic services is a Blanket Purchase Order and is charged initially to the Joint Operating fund. The Budget allocation is reassigned to the project or overhead number for which the work is requested at the time service is provided. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES There are no known cost efficient alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS None MS:jep:sa G:WgboapAgende Draft Rep tsUolnt BoardMAR 102302 for OCB Spec No.99006 5.dm Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, September 25, 2002 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, September 25, 2002 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Shidey McCracken, Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Steve Anderson, Vice Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Russell Patterson, Chairman, PDC Committee Maintenance Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair Jim Colston, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Jim Silva, County Supervisor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel Julio Lara, RWQCB Don Hughes, Supervisor Silva's Office Gary Stewart, RWQCB Gerard Thibeault, RWQCB Kris Lindstrom, Consultant Brad O'Brien, US Dept. of Justice Randy Fuhrman Robert Moyer,US EPA, Region 9 Doug Korthof THomas Huetteman,US EPA, Region 9 Joey Racano Janet Hashimoto, US EPA, Region 9 Jan Vandersloot Jerry Klug, US EPA, Region 9 (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman commented that the he thought the information presented in last month's Steering Committee's closed session should have been public information. He also mentioned that the Committee should consider a direct contract with John Freshman (Item B.B.) rather than paying mark-up to ENS Resources for a subcontractor. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 September 25, 2002 ` (4) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the August 28, 2002 Steering Committee meeting were approved as corrected. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Shirley McCracken reported that Steve Anderson has volunteered to be the District representative on the Orange County Council of Governments. An alternate is still needed for this position in the event Director Anderson cannot attend a meeting. Chair McCracken also reported on the Joint Management Committee meeting yesterday. ESA has been selected to do the federal EIS and CA EIR report on the relocation project. This report is expected to be completed in December 2003. An update on the eight alternatives was provided. General Manager Blake Anderson also reported on progress of the SARI relocation project. The Corps of Engineers has established August 2003 as the drop dead date for changes to its project in the river. There is consideration being given to incorporating the proposed SARI project into the Corps'project.This will be discussed at the next PDC Committee meeting. Who would pay for the project has not yet been determined, though the Corps has previously indicated that it would pay the equivalent of the least costly alternative. Mr. Anderson reported that he is working with the general manager of SAWPA on the $3 million in past due invoices for engineering work, as well as the potential transfer of ownership of the SARI line north of SAVI Ranch. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A two-day workshop on asset management was held Monday and Tuesday. This tool will be used to integrate everything we do. A gap analysis was performed and a game plan is being developed based on the findings in the analysis. Mr. Anderson announced that on October 10 the Orange County Infrastructure Report Card will be unveiled. It is anticipated that this report card will begin a county-wide dialogue on what do we do to correct problems that have been identified pertaining to the condition, operations and capacity of the eight studied assets. Mr.Anderson reported that he will be presenting a 35-year service award to Gary Streed at tonight's Board meeting. He also announced that Ms. Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, has submitted her resignation effective October 18 to join a private firm in Santa Barbara. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported on a recent Supreme Court ruling that limits invocations at public meetings to non-sectarian references only. He will be preparing an opinion memo for the Directors on this matter. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 September 25, 2002 (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS(Items A-F) A. NPDES Permit Application Issues—Information Only Bob Ghirelll, Director of Technical Services, summarized progress to date. Negotiations are underway with the regulators. The regulators are visiting the District today so that staff can give them an appreciation of all of our efforts and to understand all of our challenges in moving to secondary treatment standards. B. Additional Information to ENS Resources consulting services for Washington representation Mr. Anderson presented additional information on the services to be provided by ENS Resources. This firm has been representing the District's interests in Washington for the last four years. The additional scope will cover services to assure that regulatory fines are not raised as we move forward towards secondary standards by possibly amending the language of the Clean Water Act and to continue to work on securing funding or grants to offset some of our costs for moving to secondary standards. There was a discussion about contracting with John Freshman directly. Mr. Anderson pointed out that there is no subcontractor markup in ENS Resources' proposal, and that by working through ENS Resources we can be assured that the work is a coordinated effort and that there would be only one point of contact. The Steering Committee did not oppose Increasing the contract amount with ENS Resources for the additional work. C. Consider support for Proposition 50,the Clean Water and Coastal Protection Bond on the November 5 ballot Mr.Anderson provided an overview of the terms and conditions of Proposition 50, which targets a wide-range of issues of interest to the District. After discussion, the Steering Committee decided not to take a position on this proposition. D. Consider Joint Exercise of Power Agreement (Draft 33)for Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36 Mr. Anderson reported that Draft 33 was endorsed by the Joint Coordinating Committee on Monday, September 24, and will now go through both agencles'committee and board approval process. There are a couple of changes that are being made because of the time It has taken to finalize the agreement so Draft 35 will be the document presented for final approval. Cost estimates and completion schedules are also be updated. The design is at about 60%and the current project cost estimate is$427 million, some of which will be offset by grants. Time for project completion is scheduled for fall 2007. Director Patterson Indicated that the Board needs to have the answers to the questions he posed in his letter to the JCC, including why the 21 percent cost increase. It Is his opinion that the Directors are not receiving enough information and has asked that the weekly reports be expanded to more fully explain what is happening. Mr. Anderson reported that he is having regular meetings with Paul Brown (CDM)and Virginia Grebbien, OCW D general manager,to answer the questions raised by Director Patterson. Minutes of the Steering Committee ' Page 4 September 25, 2002 ' E. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in October were reviewed. Director McGuigan reported that she would not be attending the next OMITS Committee meeting. F. There were no questions on the agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 23, 2002 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 23, 2002 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:05 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9(b)(1),to discuss labor negotiations and potential litigation relating to the District's discharge pursuant to Its NPDES Permit. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:57 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. 1 Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 1 September 25, 2002 (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Submitted by: Tappan Bring Committee Secretary Q'Iy MeepeMaLSlear4p Cam ftlar'Swwww SC MFuIeB w DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE RE URBAN RUNOFF MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, September26, 2002 A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, September 26, 2002 at 4 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel Don Bankhead, Ad Hoc Committee Chair Don Hughes, Supervisor Silva's office Patty Campbell, Director Vicki Wilson, County of Orange Debbie Cook, Director Larry McKenney, County of Orange Norm Eckenrode, Director Geraldine Lucas, City of Huntington Beach Beth Krom, Director Don McIntyre, Consultant Roy Moore, Director Ken Schiff,SCCWRP Tad Ridgeway, Director Dr. Stanley B. Grant, UCI Jim Silva, Director/Supervisor Norris Brandt, IRWD Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Randy Fuhrman Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Mike Rucupto Directors Absent: STAFF PRESENT: None Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Gary Streed, Director of Finance Liss Murphy, Communications Manager Tom Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist Adriana Renescu, Engineering Supervisor Jean Tappan, Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Director Roy Moore was appointed Chair pro tem in Director Bankhead's absence. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. V Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Page 2 September 26, 2002 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The revised minutes of the August 29, 2001 meeting were ordered to be received and filed. They were previously approved. Board Chair Shirley McCracken asked that introductions be made because of the many guests. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Blake Anderson gave an overview of the committee's activities to date and stated that the goal of the Ad Hoc Committee was to define the District's participation and role in the regional urban runoff program. (6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (7) DISCUSSION ITEMS—Items(A-F) A. Update on latest urban runoff and stormwater research findings including microbial source tracking Mr. Ken Schiff, Deputy Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project(SCCWRP) and Dr. Stanley B. Grant, Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at UC Irvine, provided an overview of the studies being done on water quality in the ocean and on the beaches, specifically how urban runoff impacts the quality. Mr. Schiff provided an overview of the big picture of monitoring and the results in the Southern California Bight, an area from Point Conception north of Santa Barbara to Punta Banda, Mexico near Ensenada, or about 690 miles of shoreline. He described the existing monitoring efforts, which are greater than in any other part of the country and explained the limitations of monitoring programs. He reported on the results of three studies done in summer 1998, Dry Winter 1999 and Wet Winter 2000. He stated that an epidemiology study would need to be done in order to address changes to the existing bathing water health standards. There has only been one such study done and that was in Santa Monica Bay monitoring three drains only. Another is planned for San Diego. These tests cost about$1.6-1.9 million each and are paid for by agencies at this time. SCCWRP is lobbying EPA to select a study site in California, particularly Southern California. SCCWRP is currently planning a study that will simultaneously test a variety of bacterial source tracking methods and determine the best method to differentiate among human and animal sources of fecal indicator bacteria. Dr. Stanley Grant explained his research and the problems encountered identifying sources of contamination and then ways to fix the problems. His research is designed to better understand the variability of water quality in the surfzone itself. Using hourly test results from an OCSO study his goal is to attempt to identify where the sources are, what they are and, ultimately, how to treat them. Both the Santa Ana River and Talbert Marsh have been identified as sources and appear to be influenced by the changing Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Page 3 September 26, 2002 tides. Continued study is necessary to determine what actually triggers an event and the sources that may be causing pollution events further upcoast from the River and Marsh systems. B. IRWD's Urban Runoff Program using Natural Treatment Systems Norris Brandt, Assistant to the General Manager-IRWD, explained the agency's planned San Diego Creek Watershed Natural Treatment System. It is intended to handle dry weather runoff by placing small man-made wetlands throughout the IRWD watershed. About 70%of the nitrogen will be removed from the runoff, as well as 50,000 tons of sediment and 10,000 pounds of phosphorus and prevent them from reaching the Upper Newport Bay, as well as providing a natural resource, riparian habitat and wildlife and water quality benefits throughout the watershed. This is a joint effort among IRWD, the County of Orange and the cities of Irvine, Lake Forest, Orange, Newport Beach and Tustin. Sixty-five sites have been identified and construction of the first 37 sites is expected to cost about$30 million and annual O&M costs are estimated between $2-3 million. The build out is expected in 10-15 years. Mr. Brandt said that the COE is following this project closely because it is considering similar facilities on the San Gabriel River. The County of Orange is also interested In it as a possible solution to Coyote and Carbon Creek cleanup efforts. C. Regional management strategies related to urban runoff, water quality and watersheds throughout Orange County Mr. Larry McKenney, Manager, Watershed and Coastal Resources Division, Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department, stated that the County is focused on how they are doing business. The County Is being driven by regulatory requirements in the new storm water permits, beach closures and beach erosion. They have embraced the watershed approach and will employ Best Management Practices in the Storm Water program, which will be developed on a county-wide basis. It will include education, developing a watershed model and capital facilities. They are also pursuing research on source tracking methods. Hot spots are being identified and prioritized. A retrofitting opportunities master plan is being developed and should be completed in June. It will present a general approach to a regional solution in partnership with other agencies, including OCSD. Meetings continue between the County and the District on refining what the shared and overlapping responsibilities are. D. Status of City of Salinas Proposition 218 Case Tom Woodruff, General Counsel for the District, explained the case and the court's decision and the likes and differences between it and our situation. It is his opinion that the District could collect a user fee to treat the urban runoff, but not for any capital expenditures without going through the 218 process. E. OCSD Urban Runoff Diversion Program Tom Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist at OCSD, provided an update on the current program. He described the existing temporary and permanent diversions that the County has Installed. There are 16 systems in operation with 1 proposed. The flow from these diversions is about 2.5 mgd, well below the allowed 10 mgd. Flows are projected to Increase to about 2.9 mgd. Staff is in the process of planning a triennial review of the program that will make recommendations based on the findings at a future Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff I Page 4 t September 26, 2002 ' Ad Hoc Committee meeting. A list of questions that the directors need to address is being developed. This will be an agenda item for the next Ad Hoc meeting. Mr. Meregillano reported that there have been no adverse impacts on the District's operations to date as a result of taking these urban runoff flows. F. Wrap up and schedule next meeting Board Chair McCracken directed Mr. Anderson and Director Bankhead to determine the date for the next meeting. (8) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (9) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEOUENT MEETING There were none. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff meeting will be scheduled after consultation between Chair Bankhead and Mr. Anderson. The fourth Thursday of the month continued to be the preferred day for meetings. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (13) ADJOURNMENT The Chair pr tem declared the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Su miffed by: Je Tappan, Commit'ee ecretary M AfteeoeeneweHooc m.aewmen nu,mmorxnzmanaeHoc c ,Wee mowme.mm { 4 ' Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, October 2, 2002 — 6 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on October 2, 2002, in the District's Operations Center at Plant No. 2. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Debbie Cook Bob Doter, Director of Operations & Maintenance Tony Kawashima Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Anna Piercy Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Tod Ridgeway Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Paul Walker Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair George Robertson, Senior Scientist Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Pat McGuigan, Chair Others: Don Bankhead Brad Hogin, General Counsel's Office Mike Markus, OCWD Dr. Stephen Weisberg, SCCWRP Randy Fuhrman Irwin Haydock Greg Jewell Don Schultz (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance 1 and Technical Services Committee J Page 2 October 2, 2002 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Don Schulz commented on the recent electrical accident at Plant 2, referred to the National Electronic Code, and is hopeful the District will develop a safety procedures process that would eliminate accidents of this type in the future. Blake Anderson responded that the District has a complex set of protocols for addressing power shutdowns in the facilities. Most of the responsibilities lie with District staff, but some responsibilities lie with the contractors. Staff is reviewing all protocols involved with electrical shutdowns. Randy Fuhrman requested to address Item 8(b) when it was considered. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Vice Chair Ferryman thanked staff for the informative tour. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson stated that on the tour the Directors saw what staff is doing to upgrade disinfection treatment in the short-term. Staff is continuing to make upgrades on existing facilities in order to increase the amount of secondary treatment the facilities can provide. The upgrading of level of treatment Is Impacting all departments: design,finance; procurement; staffing; permitting, etc. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the September 4, 2002 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting was approved as drafted and ordered filed. b. OMTS02-59 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. C. OMTS02-60 Receive and file Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance, financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. d. OMTS02-61 Receive and file Information Technology Quarterly Report, which focuses on current performance trends and key technology business applications. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for Items specified as 6(a)through (d) under Consent Calendar. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee ' Page 3 October 2, 2002 (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS02-62 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$285,000 for Phase II Biotrickling Filter Demonstration Project, SP-90,for a total budget of$735,000, as an alternative treatment to control odors; and, (2)Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Study Agreement with the University of California, Riverside to provide continued support for testing biotric ling filters as an air emissions control technology for an additional amount of$60,000,which includes a $15,000 contingency; for a total amount not to exceed $205,000. Ed Torres reported biological treatment for odor control has been studied for a number of years, and most recently biob is ling filters. He discussed the need for additional research to improve on the removal of odorous compounds that are not removed by conventional scrubbers. Mr. Torres displayed samples of the current foam packing being used and the rigid structured foam packing the additional study would use to remove those compounds. It was reported that the Phase I study authorized by the Board of Directors in June 2001 allowed retrofitting of a scrubber at Plant 1. Because of its success, four additional towers at Plant 2 were retrofitted. The study has shown tremendous success,with most of the hydrogen sulfide being removed as well as eliminating chemicals. Staff has learned, however, that other compounds in small concentrations are extremely odorous, and further research is needed to determine the best method of removing the compounds. Chemical savings with the retrofitted scrubbers amount to over$200,000 annually. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS02-63 Update on Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Activities Dr. Stephen Weisberg, Executive Director of SCCWRP, provided an update on recent microbiological research conducted by SCCWRP. Items discussed were: rapid indicator development technology that should be available in two to three years, which would map bacterial indicators much faster than current technology; microbiological source tracking, which would provide a way to identify properties of bacteria and determine the source the bacteria was derived; and an epidemiology study, which is unprecedented and has already been written about in the Journal of Science. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 October 2, 2002 b. OMTS02-64 Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Blake Anderson reported that the project budget adopted in March 2001 was based on early design work. Increased estimates at this time were not unexpected and some of the costs are offset by additional grant money that was not anticipated in 2001. Mr.Anderson addressed the question of possibly using the 78-inch outfall on a perpetual basis and not utilizing the groundwater replenishment system for high-Flow relief. Based on conversations with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, they were of the opinion long-term use of this outfall would Impact the beaches. Mike Markus, GWRS construction project manager, explained the reasons for the increase in capital costs from March 2001 ($352 million)to October 2002 ($427 million)and outlined the proposed project cost controls. Mr. Markus briefly described a project cost control system that was to be implemented. He stated a detailed monthly project report would be distributed to the directors. He also mentioned that there could be future cost impacts because the project schedule has not been finalized. It was also reported that the $427 million estimate may change depending on how the construction bids come in. Brad Hogin,Assistant General Counsel, provided the directors with an overview of the agreement. He stated that the agreement is better and stronger now, and explained the basic terms of the agreement which only covers Phase 1 facilities. The agreement sufficiently protects the interests of both agencies while strongly incentivizing their long-teen participation in the project. Randy Fuhrman spoke to the directors and asked that they thoroughly understand what the agreement really says and does before they consider approving the agreement. He asked them to carefully read particular sections of the agreement. Irwin Haydock addressed the directors and asked them to remember the District will be required to provide OCWD with a strategic supply of high quality water to be reclaimed. He expressed the directors look carefully at the cost, value and need for the water, and the cost for supplying the water, and not agree to penalties when OCSD is not able to provide the amount of water OCWD is requesting as long as OCSD is supplying enough good water for OCWD to run their system. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology had no report. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported the District was successfully disinfecting the effluent. On average the District is discharging less than 1% of the bacteria that was discharged previously. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 October 2, 2002 (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported that AB 1969 was signed by the governor. He updated the directors on permit negotiations with the EPA. The draft permit application would be reviewed at the October board meeting, and considered for approval at the November board meeting. (12) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not in attendance. (13) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for November 6, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. Kyle e Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary GA.p.dtMagwda%0MrS%200ZQ002 OWS Minu %100202 mhum .dm `Y OMTS COMMITTEE Neeureoate TOBd.0f Dlr. 10/y02 10/x0/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Namber oMTS02-e2 12 c Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Air Quality & Special Projects SUBJECT: PHASE II BIOTRICKLING FILTER DEMONSTRATION PROJECT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve a budget amendment of$285,000 for Phase II Biotrickling Filter Demonstration Project, SP-90,for a total budget of$735,000, as an alternative treatment to control odors; and, 2. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Study Agreement with the University of California, Riverside to provide continued support for testing biotrickling filters as an air emissions control technology for an additional amount of$60,000, which includes a $15,000 contingency, for a total amount not to exceed $205,000. SUMMARY e In June 2001, the Board authorized a sole source agreement with UC Riverside to perform research on a new scrubber technology designed to reduce odors at the treatment plants. The biotrickling filters successfully remove the odorous chemical hydrogen sulfide equal or better than the present scrubbers. Further research is recommended by staff to improve removal of other odorous compounds that are not removed by the District's conventional scrubbers. • The research included retrofitting an existing District chemical scrubber to a biotrickling filter, monitoring and analyzing its performance in removing hydrogen sulfide, developing capital and operating cost estimates for future retrofits, providing technical expertise and guidance and developing a final report, which is expected in November 2002. e Our research has shown that compounds other than hydrogen sulfide, although present in very low concentrations, are the major causes of odors in some foul air streams. Therefore, further research is needed to determine the operating conditions and treatment retention times needed to remove these other odorous compounds. cn v Rwm 002eoa,eA2u,a. 12,1,.uC a..emca me Page • The following Phase II research is recommended by staff to increase the likelihood of successful biotrickling filter applications and to take advantage of the knowledge that already has been gained from earlier research: 1. Expand the current testing program by focusing on improving the biotrickling filters' effectiveness in removing compounds other than hydrogen sulfide that are contributing to offsite odor impacts. 2. Test rigid structured foam packing (compared to the existing random foam packing) as a possible way to reduce the higher than expected pressure drop through biotrickling filters (and thus reduce the operating costs). Three additional chemical scrubbers will be retrofitted with the structured foam packing. • Staff recommends continuing the collaboration with the University of California, Riverside to provide technical assistance and consulting expertise in evaluating biotrickling filter applications. University of Califomia, Riverside personnel have acknowledged expertise in the field of biological filtration and have provided very valuable assistance in the current project. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The estimated cost for the proposed Phase II Biotrickling Filter Demonstration project is shown below: University of California, Riverside contract for technical Assistance (including $15,000 contingency) $ 60,000 Retrofit cost for 3 scrubbers (including $25,000 Contingency) $ 145,000 District internal and laboratory costs $ 80,000 Estimated Cost $ 285,000 There are savings in chemicals and maintenance costs with biotrickling filters compared with chemical scrubbers. In addition there are other benefits of biotrickling filters over chemical scrubbers including less hazardous work environment and ability to treat additional air pollutants (smog forming compounds and hazardous air pollutants)that are regulated by the SCAQMD. For perspective, a summary of the total costs incurred to date including the proposed cost for Phase II is provided below: Original feasibility study and laboratory work by University of California, Riverside $ 25,000 Biotrickling Filter Demonstration Project Phase I contract with ca ,ftW�• Room. 2a dname Repwnnao Mfi(c)U R� d. Page University of California, Riverside $ 145,000 District internal costs including laboratory work for Phase 1 $ 80,000 Conversion costs for 5 scrubbers in Phase 1 $ 200,000 Total Phase I Cost $ 450,000 Total Estimated Cost for Phase II 285,000 Total Project Cost $ 735,000 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted (Line item :) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (Line item: Special Projects, Section 8, Page 10) ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Background • The District and the wastewater treatment industry have been interested in biological approaches of biofilters and biotrickling filters (which are a particular type of biofilter) for air emissions control for several years. • The potential advantages of biological technologies over traditional chemical treatment approaches are reduced Operations and Maintenance costs, the ability to treat a wider range of air pollutants [odors, volatile organic compounds, and air toxics], and improved safety by eliminating the use of dangerous chemicals. • Biological treatment capability is becoming more important as the South Coast Air Quality Management District focuses their attention on ever-expanding numbers of compounds. Biological filters are able to remove volatile organic compounds and toxic compounds that chemical scrubbers do not remove. • The safety of plant staff is improved when hazardous chemicals used in conventional scrubbers are no longer used. Previous Work • Staff investigated various types of biofilters about seven years ago using pilot-scale equipment. That work demonstrated the ability of biofilters to treat various foul air streams containing various odorous compounds. G- ndWWpaee•Be•aAge noow m W ,t(c).uc"WftAm Page 3 I • An important goal has been to find cost-effective ways to convert existing scrubbers into biofilters rather than building entirely new units. The problem has been that the high air velocities in the District's typical scrubbers would not allow enough contact time for a biofilter to be effective. • An initial District-funded study at the University of California, Riverside evaluated the feasibility of converting scrubbers to biofilters using special foam packing from Germany. The results were very encouraging and suggested that a number of the District's scrubbers were conversion candidates, with potential cost savings resulting in payback periods of less than one year in some cases. • One existing scrubber initially was converted in Phase I and evaluated. Based on its success, four additional scrubbers were converted. • The District has saved more than $100,000 (at FY 2001-02 chemical prices) in chemical costs as a result of retrofitting 2 high chemical use scrubbers last fiscal year. Staff estimates an additional $100,000 in chemical savings when the 3 additional scrubbers are retrofitted, resulting in a payback period of less than 1.5 years. Phase II Project Scope and Objectives The project will expand the testing, evaluation, and optimization of the 5 scrubbers that have been converted to biotrickling filters, convert 3 additional scrubbers, and prepare interim and final reports. ALTERNATIVES No action; do not continue testing biological alternatives to conventional wet chemical scrubbers. This is not recommended due to the potential cost savings and safety improvements that would not be realized in both current operations and future odor control facilities. CEQA FINDINGS: This research effort is categorically exempt from CEQA (Section 15306). ATTACHMENT None G:wmn•egen"% and Agenda a�UW2 eaard ng Adgdn:IWZftem 12R1 uc w .deme Page t DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, October 3,2002, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STAFF PRESENT: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Blake Anderson, General Manager Directors Present: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Russell Patterson, Chair Maintenance Jerry Sigler, Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Interim Engineering Manager Mike Alvarez Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Patty Campbell Chuck W insor, Engineering Supervisor Laurann Cook Chuck Lee, Construction Inspection Supervisor Alice Jempsa Wendy Sevenandt, GW RS Project Manager Norm Eckenrode Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Hardat Khuball, Project Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Beth Krom OTHERS PRESENT: Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Brad Hogin, General Counsel's Office Mike Markus, OCWD Randy Fuhrman (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman asked that he be allowed to address item 10.g (PDCO2-76)on the agenda when it was considered. The Chair granted Mr. Fuhrman's request (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Russ Patterson did not make a report. PDC Committee Minutes , Page 2 October 3, 2002 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson noted that Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance, reported that disinfection is consistently achieving very good kills of Indicator bacteria. Staff continues to work on planning for long-term disinfection. There is consistent Improvement to SS and BOD numbers as secondary is brought on line. Blake Anderson reported that Engineering is looking at what it will take to move to 30:30. The County is working on coordinating the urban runoff Issues. The OMTS Committee toured the disinfection facilities at Plant 2 last night. Chair McCracken suggested that the rest of the directors also have an opportunity to see the same facilities and the research projects that are underway. (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering was not present. (7) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not present. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (9) CONSENT CALENDAR (hems a-g) a. RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive,file,and approve draft minutes of the September 5,2002 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached is the Quarterly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an information only item. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There are no change orders this month for PDC Committee approval. C. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Attached is the PSA and Addenda Report. This Is an Information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There were no PSAs and no Addenda approved by the General Manager from August 23 through September 19, 2002. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 October 3, 2002 d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. e. QUARTERLY CONTRACT STAFFING ASSIGNMENTS REPORT Attached is the Quarterly Contract Staffing Assignments Report. This is an information only item. I. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only item. g. QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GWRS) STATUS REPORT Attached is the Quarterly Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) Status Report. This is an information only item. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 9(a)through 9(g) under Consent Calendar. (10) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-g) a. PDCO2-70 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify use of General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSO 99-23, for a purchase order issued to Ken Thompson, Inc. to construct a sewer line within Prospect Avenue in the City of Tustin, for an amount not to exceed $234,213. Moved,seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify use of General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No.OCSD 99-23, for a purchase order issued to Ken Thompson, Inc. to construct a sewer line within Prospect Avenue in the City of Tustin, for an amount not to exceed$234,213. b. PDCO2-71 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Construction Agreement with Southern Contracting Company for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-33-1A, indemnifying Southern Contracting Company for installing, connecting, and energizing equipment suitable for electrical unclassified areas,which will be located and operating in areas classified as hazardous. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 October 3, 2002 Moved,seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. t to the Construction Agreement with Southern Contracting Company for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No.J-33-1 A, indemnifying Southern Contracting Company for installing,connecting, and energizing equipment suitable for electrical unclassified areas, which will be located and operating in areas classified as hazardous. C. PDCO2-72 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)Approve a budget amendment in the amount of$2,180,000, increasing the overall budget to $7,430,000 for the Short-Tenn Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No.J-87; (2)Approve plans and specifications and authorize advertising for public bids;and (3)Authorize the General Manager to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder for an amount not to exceed the$4,100,000. Jim Herberg provided a brief overview of the project and stated that the Board of Directors will receive a report on the bid results. Moved, seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)Approve a budget amendment in the amount of $2,180,000, increasing the overall budget to$7,430,000 for the Short- Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No.J-87; (2) Approve plans and specifications and authorize advertising for public bids;and (3) Authorize the General Manager to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder for an amount not to exceed the$4,100,000. d. PDCO2-73 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, providing for additional design engineering and materials testing services for an additional amount of$555,403, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,754,511. Jim Herberg described the additional work and related costs. Moved,seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No.5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, providing for additional design engineering and materials testing services for an additional amount of$555,403, increasing the total amount not to exceed$1,754,511. e. PDCO2-74 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates/Montgomery Watson Harza for the preparation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement, Contract No. 2-41,for an amount not to exceed $420,000. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 October 3, 2002 Jim Herberg reported on the need for a new EIR/EIS to cover the eight identified alternatives to the project. The SARI JMC approved the recommendation at its last meeting. Costs will be shared with SAW PA. Moved,seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates/Montgomery Watson Harza for the preparation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement, Contract No.2.41,for an amount not to exceed $420,000. I. PDCO2-75 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Final Comprehensive Odor Control Program Evaluation and Improvement Report(A.K.A. Odor Control Master Plan), Job No.J-71-4, dated July 31, 2002, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. Jay Witherspoon, CH2M Hill, reported on this two-year effort on how to reach a goal of zero odor complaints. He reported that existing odor control facilities are reaching the end of their useful life, increasing maintenance costs. The findings show that there is a need for a more complex system at Plant 2 than at Plant 1 because offsite odor impacts are different The total cost to reconstruct odor facilities at both plants is about$129 million. Most of these costs are already identified in future projects. Mr.Witherspoon also discussed the evaluation of the collection system, staffing impacts, and described other recommended improvements. Staff has begun implementing some of the recommended improvements already. Committee Chair Patterson suggested that staff use this Information as a public education/information tool. Moved, seconded and duly carried to: Recommend to the Board of Directors that the Final Comprehensive Odor Control Program Evaluation and Improvement Report (A.K.A. Odor Control Master Plan), Job No.J- 71-4, dated July 31, 2002, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc., be received and filed. g. PDCO2-76 (1)Approve a budget amendment of$28,700,000, increasing the OCSD share to$229,906,000, and (2)Approve Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acre Project Randy Fuhrman spoke to the directors about thoroughly understanding what the agreement really says and does because he thinks there is some ambiguity. He asked them to carefully read particular sections of the agreement. He cautioned the directors to make sure the agreement says what is meant, and if it doesn't they should make it right. PDC Committee Minutes , Page 6 October 3, 2002 Mr. Blake Anderson described the actions before the committee. The project budget adopted in March 2001 was based on early design work (referred to as the 30%design level). He said that increased estimates at this time are not unexpected and that some of the costs are offset by additional grant money that was not anticipated in 2001. Mr. Anderson addressed the idea of using the 78-inch outfall for emergency and peak flows that was put forward by one of the directors and said that the Regional Board has initially responded that using that ouffall would impact the beaches. Mike Markus, GWRS construction project manager, explained the reasons for the increase in capital costs from March 2001 ($352 million)to October 2002 ($427 million)and outlined the proposed project cost controls. There was an independent review of the designer's proposed costs and that reviewed verified the $427 million. Chair Patterson stated that he'd like to have a workshop on each of the items because some of the increases are due to changes in scope and costs of the delay in the project construction start. He asked that more detail be provided at the next JCC meeting. Mr. Markus indicated that a project cost control system will be implemented. He stated that there will be a detailed monthly project report distributed to the directors. He also mentioned that there could be future cost impacts because the project schedule has not been finalized. Escalation costs to the mid point of construction have not been determined. The$427 million estimate may change depending on how the construction bids come in. Director Laurann Cook expressed her concern about the amount of information that the directors are required to digest and that there isn't time to review it all between receiving the information and the meetings and that at this time she was not ready to approve the budget. Brad Hogin, from General Counsel's office, provided the directors with an overview of the agreement as it stands. Most of the changes were to remove or change things the previous Water District Management had asked for. He stated that the agreement is better and stronger now. He explained the basic terms of the agreement, which only covers Phase 1 facilities. The agreement sufficiently protects the interests of both agencies while strongly incentivizing their long-term participation in the project. Moved, seconded and duly carried to: Approve Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development,Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acre Project. Directors Campbell and Jempsa abstained. The Committee did not vote on 10.(g).(1). PDC Committee Minutes Page 7 October 3, 2002 Mr. Anderson suggested that the budget amendment item be reviewed by the FAHR Committee at its next meeting before presenting to the full Board. This would give staff time to assemble more information on the project's increased cost. The Committee informally agreed. (11) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 7, 2002 at 5 p.m. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 7:26 p.m. Submitted by: a Tappan Committee Secretary c MxpMNWdMP�W inWes%l=W Dan PW MIWe .e PDC COMMITTEE Mwbng Date To BA.of Dir. 10/03/D2 10/23/02 AGENDA REPORT item Number item Number VDCO2-70 Ord Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Engineer SUBJECT: NEW SEWER LINE WITHIN PROSPECT AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify use of General Manager's Emergency Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for a purchase order issued to Ken Thompson, Inc. to construct a sewer line within Prospect Avenue in the City of Tustin for an amount not to exceed $234,213. SUMMARY Background • This item is a notification of the General Managers Purchasing Authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23 for Purchase Orders in excess of$100,000. • A purchase Order for$234,213 was issued to Ken Thompson, Inc. to construct a portion of a new sewer line in the City of Tustin. Normally, a sole source purchase order would be issued for emergency work. In this case, the District had enough time to select proposals from three Contractors and selected the Contractor with the lowest cost proposal. • The work to be accomplished is considered an emergency to install a section of a new sewer within Prospect Avenue in the City of Tustin. Please see "Additional Information'. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (FY 02-03 Budget, collections system) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Charges for this work will be allocated to the Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvement Project, Contract No. 7-41. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District is in the process of preparing plans and specifications for the construction of . a replacement sewer line within Prospect Avenue in the City of Tustin. This sewer line is scheduled to begin construction in early 2003. However, the City is scheduled to undertake some major street improvements along the route of proposed sewer. The City requested that the District install a portion of the proposed sewer line in the area before the City improvements start in September 2002. The new sewer is 448 linear feet _ of 27 inch Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP). The City will not allow excavation for a new sewer in a newly paved street for five years. However, the existing sewer is now at capacity and a five year delay in the construction of the larger sewer would put the District at risk of a sewage spill in the future. Therefore, this work was accomplished on an emergency basis. In order to comply with the City's request, staff requested lump sum bids from three contractors currently working on District's projects. Ken Thompson, Inc had the lowest bid and a notice to proceed was issued. The work is now completed. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program were approved by the Board of Directors on May 24, 2000. The Notice of Determination was filed on June 15, 2000. ATTACHMENTS None MD:JL:lc G%Ap dookagendalBmN Agenda Re daIS2m2 Board Agenda Repo,W002 tem 13(c),rceo Thmrpmn ecc roared; e120MI Page 2 i PDC COMMITTEE neeareoare To 8d.of Dir. ioia3ro2 10i23102 AGENDA REPORT 1OPDO02-1 1Oen1N11Oe rocozar rNu Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Ed Triggs, Project Engineer SUBJECT: STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-33-lA GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Construction Agreement with Southern Contracting Company for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-33-1A, indemnifying Southern Contracting Company for installing, connecting, and energizing equipment suitable for electrical unclassified areas, which will be located and operating in areas classified as hazardous. SUMMARY • Job No. J-33-1A, Standby Power and Reliability Improvements at Plant No. 2, includes work to reconfigure existing electrical systems for increased capacity and reliability, and to replace or modify selected electrical equipment due to advanced age or unsuitability to withstand the existing electrical system short circuit capability. • Spec Services prepared the plans and specifications and the Construction Contract was awarded to Southern Contracting Company on April 28, 2001. • Amendment No. 1 indemnifies Southern Contracting Company for installing, connecting, and energizing equipment suitable for electrical unclassified areas, which will be located and operating in areas classified as hazardous. This-is a temporary operating condition until Job No. J-35-2, Area Classification Implementation plan is completed. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 6,329,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 151,081.00 This Change (add) $ 0.00 Change Orders to Date $ 151,081.00 Percentage Increase to Date 2.39% Amended Contract Price $ 6,480,081.00 l BUDGETIMPACT ® - This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 8, page 93, CIP,J-33-1A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The recommended action does not have a budget impact. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Indemnification for Classified (Hazardous)Areas Overview: Job No. J-35, Hazardous Area Classification Study, was initiated to identify classified areas for a remediation project after the adoption by the District of NFPA 820 (Standard for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities- 1999 Edition). This study provided the District with an assessment of the hazardous areas as defined by NFPA 820, as well as defined ultimate classifications (after remediation)for use as a design standard. Presently, most of the classified areas identified contain operating equipment that is suitable for unclassified areas only. The remediation project initiated subsequent to the study was Job J-35-2, Area Classification Study Implementation Plan. Currently, the design is complete and the construction contract has recently been awarded. Many of the electrical equipment areas are determined to be classified since they are open to tunnels or process areas that contain flammable gas piping or otherwise are exposed to a potential for flammable gas. Job No. J-35-2, in most cases, eliminates this hazard by removing the flammable gas piping or by sealing off the area from flammable vapors and adding ventilation. In most cases, the equipment does not require to be upgraded, but the area changes classification by removing hazards. Job No. J-33-1A, Standby Power and Reliability Improvements at Plant No. 2,is itself a remediation project developed from the findings indicated in the Short Circuit Study, Job No. J-25. This short circuit study identified electrical equipment that could not provide safe protection from the potential of a short circuit in the system. Job No. J-33-1A replaces or modifies equipment with limited short circuit capacity to provide a safer and more reliable facility. Job No. J-33-1A was designed after the Job No. J-35, Area Classification Study, and uses the recommendations for the ultimate area classification as basis for design. During the construction of Job No. J-33-1A, the contractor noted that many of the current classifications do not match the equipment to be supplied. Job No. J-35-2, Area Classification Implementation Plan, is not complete and as a consequence, many of the areas remain classified as hazardous areas. This affects approximately 50 percent of � ..a: Mao, Page 2 the Job No. J-33-IA contract work. Southern Contracting Company recognized that they would not be following prevailing codes and standards if they energize replacement equipment in these areas, and have requested District assistance in resolving of this problem. For the past few months, District staff, together with their Design consultant, SPEC Services, and General Counsel, researched whether the District could provide mutually accepted legal documentation to "Indemnify and Hold Harmless" Southern Contracting Company for installing and energizing Job No. J-33-lA electrical equipment in locations that are currently classified, "electrical hazardous locations." The result of this effort is the attached "AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND SOUTHERN CONTRACTING COMPANY, CORP.- This indemnification includes installing, connecting, and energizing equipment suitable for electrical unclassified areas which will be located, and operating in electrical classed areas, until the areas become declassified by the work of Job No. J-35-2. The Amendment will not indemnify the contractor for any negligence or workmanship problems associated with the work. Work procedures for the personnel required to work in these areas during the transition of compliance with NFPA 820 requirements have been developed. Delaying or deleting Job No. J-33-1A until after the completion of Job No. J-35-2 work to resolve this conflict presents consequences. The District would be operating equipment with insufficient short circuit endurance for a longer period of time, and there would be significant added cost to the project. Installing the equipment does present a technical code infraction, however the new equipment is safer and more reliable than the existing equipment. To continue on the project course will give the District the quickest method of making the facility safe and reliable, and comply with prevailing codes. This transition to NFPA 820 is not unique to our agency. It is a nationwide move in wastewater treatment plants. It is also understood that it will require time and effort for agencies to correct and comply. By the completion of these projects, we will have substantially reduced the risk we have been Irving with for sometime. However, the greatest risk would be to stall the projects that are in the stages of fixing the problems that are addressed here. ALTERNATIVES 1. Delay the construction of Job J-33-IA at the 50 % completion stage until after the completion of Job J-35-2 which is scheduled for June 2005. (Extensive Overhead and escalation costs would be incurred, as well as exposures to the limited short circuit withstand rating of the existing equipment for a longer period of time.) 2.Terminate the contract and rebid the remaining work. (Majority of the major equipment on the project has been purchased which would complicate warranty issues for futuro installation. Extensive research work in the field would need to be duplicated. Added costs to close out the contract could increase the total project cost by$2.8 Page 3 million. Exposure to the limited short circuit withstand rating of the existing equipment for a longer period of time) CEEIA FINDINGS This project was included in the previously approved programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The Master Plan was prepared by Carollo Engineers-Boyle Engineering, Joint Venture. Jones 8 Stokes prepared the EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989. The Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Amendment No. 1 DF:ET:CC:lc:ba:dm G:MtgIoEeMgenda Draft Repols\PMAR Amendment No 7 J-33-IA PDC.doc >ro � Page 4 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND SOUTHERN CONTRACTING COMPANY CORP. THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT is made and entered into, to be effective this _ day of , 2002, by and between: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "District"; AND SOUTHERN CONTRACTING COMPANY, CORP., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor". RECITALS WHEREAS, on July 5, 2001, District and Contractor entered into a Construction Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement"), in connection with District's project entitled "Standby Power and Reliability Improvements to Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2 Job No. J-33-1A"; and WHEREAS, upon entering into the Agreement, Contractor was unaware that certain work areas are "Classified Areas" as that term is used herein; and WHEREAS, Contractor requires indemnification from District to proceed with work in the Classified Areas; and WHEREAS, District has agreed to indemnify and hold Contractor harmless for work to be performed by Contractor in Classified Areas identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is agreed between the Parties hereto as follows: AGREEMENT Section 1: Section 17 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: A. All work, except as specified in Section 17.6, done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of the Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, and keep District, its Directors, Officers, Agents, Employees, Engineers, and Consultants for this 1 contract, and all public agencies from whom permits will be obtained and their Directors, Officers, Agents, and Employees harmless against any and all liability, claims, judgments, costs, and demands, Including demands arising from injuries _ or death of persons (Contractor's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of District and will make good to and reimburse District for any expenditures, including reasonable attomeys' fees, District may incur by reason of such matters, and if requested by District, will defend any such suits at the sole cost and expense of Contractor. In the event Contractor or its insurer refuses or fails to provide a legal defense to District after receiving written notice of the legal action and a tender and demand for defense, District shall have the right to select counsel of its own choice to represent all the interests of the District. Contractor agrees that the amount of legal costs and expenses including attorneys' fees may be withheld by District from any contract amounts due and owing to Contractor until such time as a final determination is made as to the responsibility for payment of said fees and costs. B. Notwithstanding the foregoing in this Section 17, District agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Contractor, its Directors, Officers, Agents, Employees, Suppliers, Manufacturers, Consultants and Subcontractors and their Directors, Officers, Agents and Employees and any of them (the "Indemnified Parties") against any and all liability, claims, judgments, costs, and demands arising from injuries or death of persons and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of work performed by Contractor or District, its Employees, other Contractors, Engineers, Vendors, consultants in Classified Areas, save and except liability, claims, judgments, costs and demands arising through the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties, and will make good to and reimburse Contractor for any expenditures Contractor may incur by reason of such matters. This obligation to defend, indemnify and hold Contractor harmless shall continue to apply to liability, claims, judgments, cost and demands arising out of work completed by Contractor in each Classified Area until such time as the Classed Area at issue becomes unclassified. For purposes of this Section 17, the term Classified Areas shall be defined as those locations listed as "Div.1" or "Div.2" in the attached "Area Classification Worksheet" underneath the column heading entitled "Current Classification". The Area Classification Worksheet is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated onto this Amendment. In the event District or its insurer refuses or fails to provide a legal defense to Contractor after receiving written notice of the legal action and a tender and demand for defense, Contractor shall have the right to select counsel of its own choice to represent all the interests of the Contractor. In the event of such refusal or failure, District agrees to compensate Contractor for the amount of 2 c legal costs and expenses including attorney's fees owing to Contractor at such time that a final determination is made as to the responsibility of payment of said fees and costs. This Amendment No. 1 to Construction Agreement shall specifically have no application to the electrical explosion occurring on August 6, 2002 at District's Plant No. 2. 2. Section 2: Agreement Remains in Effect Except as specifically amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT By Chair of the Board of Directors By Penny Kyle Secretary of the Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT COUNSEL By Thomas L. Woodruff SOUTHERN CONTRACTING COMPANY, CORP. By President By Secretary of the President EDMS 003741533 3 Exhibit A AREA CLASSIFICATION WORKSHEET - Current Work Location Classification Plant 1 Proiect Element Al - MCC-E, Power Building 1 Unclass'd MCC-F,Power Building 2 Unclass'd MCC-NB,Power Building 2 Unclass'd MCC-0, Blower Building Unclass'd MCC-OB,Blower Building Unclass'd Blower Building Basement Unclass'd MCC-M,Thickener Building Unclass'd Thickener Building-Polymer Mixer Unclass'd Chlorination Building Unclass'd MCC-AA,Power Building 3A Div.2 MCC-R, Power Building 4 Unclass'd MCC-SP, Power Building 4 Unclass'd Protect Element B3 UPS Panel UPP-A,Cengen Div.1 Proiect Element C1 Standby Generator,Power Building 3A Div.2 Protect Element C2 Standby Generator,Power Building 4 Unclass'd Plant 2 Pmiect Element At MCG-AA,MCC-AB,Power Building A Div.1 MCC-DC,MCCSL,Power Building B Unclass'd MCC-RC,Power Building B Unclass'd MCC-RS,Power Building C Div.2 MCC-RSS,Power Building C Div.2 MCC-FA,H81 Scrubber Block House Unclass'd MCC-DB,Distribution Center B Div.2 MCC.DBS,Distribution Center B Div.2 MCC-RAS-El,E2,E3, East RAS Pump Station Elect. Room Div.2 East RAS Pump Station Pump Room Div.2 MCC-RAS-WI,W2,W3,West RAS Pump Station Elect. Room Div.2 West RAS Pump Station Pump Room Div.2 MCC-TH,Thickener Div.2 MCC-TWF.Truck Wash Building Unclass'd MCC.CB,Distribution Center B Div.2 MCC-RSPB2,Headworks Power Building A Unclass'd MCC-PBB,Headworks Power Building 8 Unclassd MCC-TWS,Side Stream Pump Station Unclass'd SWBD-OB,Operations Building Unclass'd Proiect Element A2 Turbine Generator Switchgear Building Div.2 Proiect Element Bt 12kV Switchgear,Distribution Center A Div.2 12kV Switchgear,Distribution Center B Div.2 12kV Service Center Unclass'd Prolecl Element 82 MCCs'CGA'and'CGB',Central Generation Building Div.2 Proiect Element 83 Panels UPP-E,UPP-W,CenGen Electric Room Div.2 UPS's UPS-E,UPS-W,Cengen UPS location Div.2 UPS's Batteries,Cengen Battery Room Div.2 _ Central Generation Building Basement Div.2 Proiect Element B4 15kV Tie-Breaker, Distribution Center C Div.2 Proiect Element 85 Gas Compressor Building Div.1 Gas Compressor MCC GCA Building Area Unclass'd MMS W3]415 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date TOBd.-fDir. ID/D3/@ 10/23/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDDD2-72 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of O&M Originator: Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Division Manager SUBJECT: SHORT-TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION PROJECT, JOB NO. J-87 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment in the amount of$2,180,000, increasing the overall budget to $7,430,000 for Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87; (2)Approve plans and specifications and authorize advertising for public bids; and (3) Authorize the General Manager to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder for an amount not to exceed $4,100,000. SUMMARY • Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff is in the process of designing the Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 and needs to proceed with advertising, bidding, awarding, and constructing this system. The Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 must be expedited because the existing facilities are temporary. In addition, the Temporary Facility at Plant No. 1 is located in the area of the Trickling Filter Secondary Treatment Project, Job No. P1-76, and must be replaced in order to avoid construction delays in this secondary treatment expansion project. • On July 19, 2002, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) issued Order No. R8-2002-055, requiring the District to meet recreational water contact standards in the ocean. The RWQCB required the District to implement a process of disinfection using bleach for reducing bacteria, followed by dechlorination using sodium bisulfite for achieving the new ocean discharge requirements. • " The District installed the Temporary Disinfection Facilities in order to comply with the August 12, 2002, deadline date set by the RWQCB order, for achieving the New Ocean discharge requirements. • In order to meet the August 12, 2002 date, the Temporary Disinfection Facilities were not designed to District's ordinary high standards, guidelines, reliability (quality), and redundancy(quantity) requirements, and must be replaced with the Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87. f • Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 must also meet ' the discharge requirements set by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), while the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives Plan, Job No. J-40-6 is being planned and designed. • The proposed Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 have been designed in accordance with Orange County Sanitation District (District) regular requirements, standards, and guidelines, as well as reliability and redundancy. • Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. 87 are planned for three to five years of full-time operation (duty), and thereafter will be used as a standby system for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives Plan, Job No. J40-6. • A budget increase is being requested to cover the additional work and project needs. The additional work consists of planning, designing, and installing the Temporary Disinfection Facilities, changes to the Scope of Work (additional items)for the Short- Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 additional Professional Services to complete the design of Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, (as well as assistance with the temporary facilities), and for additional District staff resources and time. • Staff recommends that the Short-Tenn Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. 87 be expedited. In addition, Staff is requesting authorization to publicly bid and award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, in an amount not to exceed $4,100,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The current project budget is insufficient to meet the Project needs. The budget short- fall is due to the cost of temporary facilities ($650,000); changes in scope for the Short- Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction facilities ($1,150,000); additional Professional Services for assistance with the temporary facilities, as well as additions to the Short- Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction facilities ($300,000); and additional staff time and resources ($400,000). The cost increase for the additional work is $2,500,000 and is offset by $320,000 of decreases in other line items within this project, for a total budget increase of $2,180,000. Refer to the attached budget table for detailed information. Staff is requesting approval to establish a total Project budget of$7,430,000. Construction of the Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 is not anticipated to exceed $4,100,000. Page 2 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds (Budget Line item: Section 8—Page 91) ❑ This item has not been budgeted ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • During the February Meeting, the Board of Directors (Board) authorized the General Manager to proceed with designing and implementing the Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87. The General Manager provided a presentation on and explained the need for the disinfection facilities. The Board authorized expenditures up to $200,000, so the project momentum would be maintained. • A detailed report on Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 was presented during the March Board of Directors meeting, as requested. In addition, the Board awarded a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $447, 920 to Black and Veatch Corporation for the design of the Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87. • Staff needed to expedite various activities for testing alternatives, for determining the feasibility of various disinfection methods, and for purchasing and installing equipment. The Board increased the General Manager's authority for this project during its April meeting. • At the May 2002 Board Meeting, the General Manager reported that based on preparing the appropriate environmental reviews and documentation, as well as, planning and designing new disinfection facilities, it was determined the Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 would not be completed until Spring 2003. In addition, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) began considering modifying the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Ocean Discharge Permit in order to mandate disinfection of the treated wastewater released into the ocean. The General Manager stated that he would need to invoke the emergency provisions of the Delegation of Authority to ensure compliance with the proposed RWQCB requirements. • In anticipation of the proposed RWQCB Order, the District's Board of Directors authorized the General Manager to proceed with the expedited procurement of Temporary Disinfection Facilities at its May 2002, Regular Meeting. • Based on the anticipated adoption of the new RWQCB mandated Ocean Discharge Permit modifications (the RWQCB Order), the Board received and filed Addendum No. 6 to the Certified 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Page 3 Report at its July meeting. In addition,the Board of Directors (Board) approved the Short-Term Project, contingent upon adoption of Order No. R8-2002-055 by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). • The Temporary Disinfection Facilities were functional August 1, 2002, and commissioned on August 12, 2002. • In order to comply with the RWQCB Order and Orange County Sanitation District Board (District) direction, the Temporary Disinfection Facilities were designed and constructed on an expedited basis, and to only meet the typical building, electrical, and safety codes. Additionally, the temporary facilities do not meet the District's regular, high standards and requirements for reliability (quality) and redundancy (number of units). Therefore, the Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87 must be constructed as soon as possible. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Addendum No. 7 to the Strategic Plan Program Environmental Report (Certified October 27, 1999 and Notice of Determination Filed on October 29, 1999) is on the September Board Agenda anticipated to be received and filed by the Board of Directors on September 25, 2002. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table MAE:ct:sa:jo GMIyWtlV�Dell FeWOND 47 MS Tmm 0u 111 Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction JOB NO. J-87 —y ix4g« - ORIGINA r r r y L URR�NL POPe R § 'PRO.iECih(1$IC AU 7NOJIItE b �I JC P�}O.I' �U� r rf� ti•� '"+r�' eUiSOET ill�'S'lt{ 3i;'p6N �g et,�7 H�. y s`'b f N j �+. r . .z• .ary17yY4. of h v9seCi vF7 yA qJN Ls rf 3200 <[7000>- 70000 3200 960Project Dmlo ment $ »a E 150000 E 100000 $ 75.0% Studl"Pe Wna I s 50000D $ $ 100000 1 $ 600000 ' 500000 $ 100, 0 s 800000 $ 100000 s 16.7% Coneullam PSA $ 600000 $ $ 300000 $ 900.000 $ 600000 $ 300000 $ 900000 $ 835000 $ 70.5% Deal "Staff $ 300000 $ 4100000> $ 200000 300000 '.$ 110000% s 200000 S 150.000 $ 75.0% Conslmceon Contre 2950000 S '.1800000 S 4750000 j 600000 _4150000 3 4750000 $ 800000 S 12.8% ConabucUm Adminlsbetlon E 0 s 200000 $ 200000 `. $ 0 1 200000 $ 200000 $ 0 $ 0 CoOslrudron Ins coon s 0 E E ' 100000 $ 100000 'S $ 0 ,$ 100000 8 100000 S 0 0 Conan n E 580 000 $ <50 000> S 530,000 $ 0 $ 530 000'1 $ 530.000 0 $ 0 PROJECT TOTAL $ 5,250,000 E E . Mee. $ 7430,000 $ 2320000 $ ,. 5110000,; $ 7,430,000 $ 1,585,000 S 21.3% Reimbursable Costs $ E E $ $ E ''i' $ E $ PROJECT NET $ 5,250,000 $ $ '2.180,000 S 7430.000 S 1,720,000 E 5J10.000 $ 7,430,000 $ 1.585.000 S 21.3% Page 5 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting hate Tnatl.tf Dir. 10/03/02 taz31o2 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number POCO2-73 13cn Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Larry Rein, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION JOB NO. 1-2-4 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, providing for additional design engineering and materials testing services for an additional amount of$555,403, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,754,511. SUMMARY • The project is located within the Cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. The trunk sewer is in Bushard Avenue between Ellis Avenue and Banning Road, Banning Road between Bushard Avenue and Brookhurst, and Brookhurst between Banning Road and Plant No. 2. The project consists of four miles of 108" sewer pipe. • Due to the size and complexity of the project, additional support by the design engineer during construction is needed. The original agreement included a limited amount of construction support by the design engineer. • The additional construction support that the design engineer will be providing includes additional submittal review, additional time for consultation and meeting, additional assistance for change orders, and assistance in inspecting the pipe manufacturer's plant. • Soils, concrete and miscellaneous materials testing services will be provided under this addendum by a subcontractor to the design consultant. The subcontractor was involved in the design and therefore has a strong familiarity with the project. • Other services included in this addendum are as follows: 1. Quality control inspection during the manufacturing of the sewer pipe. 2. Additional utility research that Staff requested and was performed by the design engineer. The research was necessary due to requirements to relocate a City of Huntington Beach storm drain. 3. Preparation of the final conformed construction documents. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The authorization is within the projects budget for FY2002/03. Funds will need to be reallocated from the Contingency to Consultant Professional Services _ Agreement. See the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 2002-03, Section 8, Page 56: Capital Improvement Program, Collections Facilities, Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-24.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Due to the size of the pipe being installed and the concerns regarding construction impacts, Staff feels it is prudent to increase the design engineer's level of involvement during construction. Addendum No. 5 will also provide services for testing and inspection of soils, concrete, pipe, and miscellaneous construction materials. Staff does not have the abilities to provide the materials testing and inspection materials and the services required. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. The project was included in Addendum No. 3 to EIR approved on December 19, 2001. The addendum did not change CEQA findings. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Letter Proposal for Amending Professional Services Contract, from Boyle Engineering, dated September 11, 2002 LR:jo G:Wglo aMgenda Deft Report TDCV-2-4 AR 100302.dm Page 2 f J BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4 & ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROP0SE01 F,l3NjS� TryrS�� ' PROPOSED ESTIAIA' q T z„�Tii'h7�EU'. PROJECT7fAM AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHOFIZED AUTHORIZA710Nw TOTAL FJCPENDITUIZyF.4 MEN '-' s:� D DGE N d �17D ETmo Y 3 2-QUEST TION TOUATE &.., .ss FFiitt " '§'"':. Its -- .:.',a a✓a.3.. C Project Development $ 7,800 $ 74,000 $ - $ 74000 $ 74,000 $ 74,000 $ 73,570 99% r., Studies/Pem"ng $ 15,002 $ 7,000 $ 7.000 d $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 6,104 87% Consultant PSA $ 260,900 $ 1,852,DD0 $ 256,352 $ 2,108,352 `t $ 1,552.949 $ 555.403 2,108,352' $ 1,472,9D0 69% Design Staff $ 790,824 $ 582,000 $ 582,000 $ 582,000 $ 582,000 $ 298,180 39% Construction Contract $ 21,217.321 $ 30.007,000 $ 30,007,000 $ 30,007,000 $ 30,007,000 Construction Administration $ 1.049,624 $ 1.270,000 $ 1,270,000 t $ 1,270.000 $ 1,270,000 $ 13.365 1% Construction Inspection $ 1.913.106 $ 2.192,000 $ 2,192,000 i4' $ 2,192,000 $ 2.192.000 $ 6,650 0% Continnency $ 7,548.924 $ 3,000,000 $ 256.352 $ 2,743,648 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 32,803,501 $ 38,984,000 1 $ - $ 38,984000 $ 35,684,949 $ 555,403 $ 36,240,352 $ 1,800.769 5% Reimbursable Costs. PROJECT NET 1 $ 32,803.501 1 $ 38.984.000 1$ $ 38.984,000 $ 35,684,949 $ 555,403 $ 36,240,362 1 $ 1.800,769 5% Includes PSA with Boyle Engineering for design,DGA for Project Report and Engineering Services,and PSA with Tran Consulting Engineers for Sewer Pipeline Inspection/Evaluation. c:emReevw4tza.tn>]¢t bud M Tea.Md,02a61eY Fa Revlse4 OcL 4,20D0 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Bushard Trunk Sewer 1 Contract No. 1-2.4 Total Project Budget: $38,984,000 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Start Dale of Project: June 14, 2000 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 4/26/00 Original PSA Engineering design and construction support $845.300 $845,300 services for replacement and/or rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk Sewer. 1/11/01 Addendum No.1 Increasing the utility search activities to include 37 $24,800 $870,100 additional potholes 3121101 Addendum No. 2 Provide for additional study of City of Huntington $12,808 $882,908 Beach sewer interfacing. 6127/01 Addendum No. 3 Provide for groundwater hydraulic testing and $85,000 $967,908 include fiber optic cable conduit in the construction documents 2/28/02 Addendum No. 4 Additional engineering services including $231,200 $1,199,108 geotechnical boring work, City sewer relocation, study of flow handling for construction, Plant No. 2 entrance modifications, City stone drain relocation at Adams Blvd., pavement survey, and the connection to Plant No. 2. Pending Addendum 5 Additional engineering services for construction $555,403 $1,754,511 support including submittal review, consultation, meetings, pipe inspection, materials inspection, and eotechnical reviews. C:Wi1eNeM1M1-2-4 PSA Status RpMdoc 09/18/02 Revised 05114M 1501 Quail Street - - Newport Beach, CA 92660-2726 TEL: (949)476-3300 FAX: (949)721-7142 www.boyleengineering.com September 11, 2002 Larry Rein occu-luau 10844 Ellis Avenue Contract Project Manager ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Review of Bid and Construction Phase Services Dear Larry: Orange County Sanitation District(District)has asked that we review the services Boyle and Uur subconsultants should offer during the bid and construction phase period. The District has made recommendations with regards to certain construction phase service levels and we concur that additional services are prudent. This is a very significant project and the Boyle Engineering design team is well positioned to respond to your requests. Therefore, attached is a table identifying existing contract allowances for the bidding and construction phase and identifying proposed additions to these allowances. The attached summary table has been developed with the District through identification of needs and negotiations over the last three months. In addition to the proposed increase in construction services,the table includes a proposed adjustment for additional work incurred during the bid phase,.work for preparing the conformed construction documents, and additional utility research (potholing). Previously,we submitted under separate cover a request for additional compensation for design services. Our understanding is this request will be evaluated at a later stage in the project when service needs become better defined. _ Even now additional consulting service needs are being identified. These needs include assistance in obtaining building permits, evaluation of an alternative flow diversion strategy, evaluation of the function of the Ellis Junction Structure in relationship to the proposed Ellis Pump Station Modifications, clarification of traffic routing requirements for Plant 2 work, and assistance with site work for a temporary fire station. These items are identified as subtasks of Construction Consultation Services (Task 4.3)where know and quantifiable. During our negotiations, District request that Boyle present a separate proposal for construction testing services by our subcontractor, Geomatrix. District was in the process of evaluating whether to amend our contract to include these services or to utilize existing on-call service _ Proposal kner 9-i I.Ex aOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION p......... _ Larry Rein September I 1-. 2_002 . Page 2 contracts for these services. The District has compared these proposed testing fees with industry fees and have interviewed Geomatrix. 'My understanding is that the District now wishes to include these services now; therefore the services are part of the attached summary table. The services are separately identified. As I have stated before, I believe that Geomatrix should provide the geotechnical testing - services. This is a very large project with pipe segments relatively deep in the ground when we know there will be groundwater issues and probably peat issues as well. Geomatrix is most familiar with the ground conditions and undoubtedly will be called for consultation. Their involvement in the field testing should make that process much more efficient and avoid conflicts between opinions of two geotechnical firms. Therefore, I believe the District is making the proper choice. Based on an approximate$30 million project, and excluding geotechnical services and in-plant observation,the bid and construction phase services proposed is approximately 1.0%of the constructed value.This is judged to be very reasonable, if not low, for this type of work. As previously noted,the fees and services presented have been previously reviewed and negotiated with District Staff. We respectfully request that the District consider the value of Boyle providing the services outlined in the attachment. We will be available to discuss this request and believe the District will be well served by approval of our request. Sincerely, Bo / eering Corporation 9 Richard Bardin Philip Stone Project Manager Principal Engineer 'V'.\CI I\150\Doce\aid&Corm.Ph Svcs-Fimncme N pwW lever 9-1IAoc Bidding and Construction Phase Services - Including Testing - Identification of Bushard Trunk Sewer - Job 1-2-4 Existing Contract Amounts and Proposed Additional Services Costs Profit at Current Labor Burdened B 25% Total Contract t Hours (or Rate Overhead (comrades Direct Additional Service Amount Comment/Basis work units) (Average) Total at 102% e.22%) Costs Proposed Prebid Meeting (Current Current contract amount , [ask no. 3.1) $1,500 was adequate f $0 ase on a ac ua me Consultation during expenditures, Boyle is Bidding (Current task no. asking this item be 3.2) $4,000 increased. 32 $b4l $2,048 $2,089 $341 $3001 $4.778 Award Recommendation Current contract amount (Current task no. 3.3) $900 was adequate * $0 Consultant Fees $6.400 32 :-111. $2,048 $2,089 $341 $300 $4,778 Preconslrucaon Meeting Current contract amount I,,y M (Task 4.1.1) $1,500 was adequate $0 eme anges- hours per sheet-20 sheets 50 $37 $1,850 $1,887 $308 $0 $4,045 Miscellaneous time plotting, reviewing, Preparation of conformed stamping& signing 1 hr construction documents per 117 sheets 117 $37 $4,329 $4,416 $721 $0 $9,466 Engineering 8 $50 $400 $408 $67 $0 $875 Paper& Misc. Supplies $200 $200 Clerical-typing 32 $25 $800 $816 $133 $0 $1,749 Clerical-specification $0 assembly 8 $25 $200 $204 $33 $0 $437 oes no me u e ac Fry inspections and Items listed separately. Current labor adequate-direct [Submittals(Task 4.2) $21,500 costs needed. 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $500 e Page 1 of 5 Bidding and Construction Phase Services - Including Testing - Identification of Bushard Trunk Sewer - Job 1-2-4 Existinq Contract Amounts and Proposed Additional Services Costs Profit at Current Labor Burdened 8.25% Total Contract I Hours (or Rate Overhead (contract is Direct Additional Service Amount Comment/Basis work units) (Average) Total at102% 9.22%) Costs Proposed ee mgs ours or . 5 people twice a month for 16 months meetings- Consullation and subtract 50 hours in Meeelings (Note current current contract. 70 $65 $4,550 $4,641 $758 $3,500 $13,449 contract provides for only onsu talion -nee 50 hours-the listed additional 16 hours per amounts are in addition month 16 months. 256 $65 $16,640 $16.973 $2,773 $0 $36,386 to this)Consultation Support site vnsls -8 requested to dale hours per 1.5 people- 16 includes flow diversion months. 192 $65 $12,480 $12,730 $2,080 $0 $27,290 study, act. (Task4.3) See Ellis Ave. Flow Diversion attached Study. Breakdown $11,997 $12,237 $1,999 $0 $26.233 $6,500 Current contract amount appears to be less than , needed, however no ` Record Drawings (Task adjustment sought at this WI s 4.4) $20,800 lime. Change Orders- Approximalely 16 hours Change Orders and RFIs per month for 16 months (Task 4.5) above total of current contract amount of 52 $6,000 hours al3 digerent rate .1 256 $65 $16,6401 $16,9731 $2,7731 $1,4001 $37,786 $0 RFIs 1 200 $65 $13,0001 $13,2601 $2,1661 $1,400 $29,826 Actual cost additional Additional Traffic control work to meet City work $0 niquirements 123 $65 $7,995 $8,155 $1,332 $1,000 $18,482 or wi a on an as needed basis-assume Quality Control full time during initial t Observation of Pipe start up and periodic Manufacturing $0 afterwards. 330 $65 $21,450 $21,879 $3,575 $6,000 $52,904 Page 2 of 5 Bidding and Construction Phase Services - Including Testing - Identification of Bushard Trunk Sewer - Job 1-24 Existing Contract Amounts and Proposed Additional Services Costs Current Labor Burdened Profit at 8.25°h Total Contract I Hours (or Rate Overhead (coniractIs Direct Additional Service Amount Comment/Basis work units) (Average) Total at102% 9.22%) Costs Proposed u onsu an ing ii—rs a significant amount of additional work and will require 2 hours Subconsullanl management effort per Management I $0 month. 1 20 $50 $1,0001 $1,020 $167 $0 $2,187 Services consulting fees $56,300 1 1,662 $113,331 $115,599 $18,885 $14,000 $2fi 1,815 ruc Bidding Consultant Fees $62,700 1,694 $115,379 $117,688 $19,226 $14,300 $266,593 Additional Potholing (5)- urrenl contract has several utility Subcontracted to Miller potholes-5 additional potholes were Pipeline(Current needed due to new record information contract amount received after design. Subcontract cost $42,300) was$600 per hole plus$600-surveying. $3,600 $3,600 avemen urvey 33K('Ands s o Subcontracted to LaBelle specialized consulting Marvin) $0 and testing services. $2,880 $2,880 e o owing are cos s or pro essiona services proviaea by a geo ec mca su onsu an eoma fix. a origins con roc cos s were no ase upon an overhead and profit rate since the fee was less than$100 00-these additional fees are based on an overhead rate of 100%and a profit of 10%. Geomatrix will be utilized Geomatrix Submittals(Task 4.2) for geolechnical related overhead Geomatrix Review by Sub- submittals(dewatering, .. rate is profit is consultant shoring,etc.) 100.5% 10% Principal Engineer ' 2 $112 $224 $225 $45 $0 $494 $0 Senior Engineer 6 $64 $384 $386 $77 $0 $847 construction support Consultation and and/or site visit per + Meetings Subconsultant month, 16 months. Principal Engineer 10 $ 12 $1.120 $1,120 $225 $0 $2.471 $0 Senior Engineer 1 118 $641 $7,5521 $7,590 $1,514 $Q $16,658 Paoe 3 of 5 Bidding and Construction Phase Services - Including Testing - Identification of Bushard Trunk Sewer - Job 1-2-4 Existing ContradAmounls and Proposed Additional Services Costs Profit at Current Labor Burdened 8 25% Total Contract I Hours(or Rate Overhead (coatrad is Direct Additional Service Amount Comment/Basis work units) Avers e) Total at 102% 9.22%) Costs Proposed Change Order Review Allowance or Sen or Subconsultant $0 Engineer 29 $64 $1,856 $1,865 $372 $0 $4,093 RFI review subconsullan( $0 Allowance for Engineer 40 $64 $2,560 $2.573 $513 $0 $5.646 eoma nx wt o erve field conditions as Geolechnical Baseline needed and provide a Report and Field letter report comparing Comparison the observed conditions with the Geolechnical $0 baseline report. 200 $64 $12,600 $12.864 $2,566 $0 $28,230 Sub-total Geomatrix professional services consullanting 405 $26,4961 $26,629 $5,312 $0 $58,437 Sub-total Subconsultant fees. r - $64,917 e following are costs for testing services provided Fy a geoteChnicai su onsu an ,Mormairix. I nese are based on charge rate fee ano testunit cost as is usual in the industry for technical services. Review of plans and $0 Principal Engineer 1 $220 $220 This is a standard fee rate $220 specifications for testing $0 Senior Engineer If 2 $150 $300 This is a standard fee rate $300 purposes. $0 Technican 4 $57 $228 This is a standard fee rate $228 Observations and ec nican rate includes Testing during Backfilling labor,testing equipment, $0 and vehicle charges) . 3000 $62 $186,000 This is a standard fee rate $186,000 Testing of Subgrades echo can(rate nclu es and pavements labor, testing equipment, $0 and vehicle charges) 160 $62 $9,920 This is a standard fee rate $9,920 $O Compaction Testing 10 $150 $1,500 This Is number of tests and fate perlest $1,500 $0 Sand Equivalent Teskngt 10 $90 $900 This Is number of testa and rate per lest $900 Laboratory Testing 16rain Size Analyses $0 Testing 5 $90 $450 This is number of tests and rate per lest $450 $0 Compaction Teslingt 1 $250 $250 This is number of tests and rate per test $250 Concrete Testing Pick-up fee only 35 $45 $1,575 This is number of sets and rate per set. $1.575 Technican to make cylinders 35 $62 $2,170 This is a standard fee rate $2,170 oncrete Compression Tests 140 $17 $2,380 This Is number of tests and role per test $2,380 Report Preparation Lump Sum Cost $4,000 o..,.e n ..f c Bidding and Construction Phase Services - Including Testing - Identification of Bushard Trunk Sewer - Job 1-2-4 Existing Contract Amounts and Proposed Additional Services Costs Profit at Current Labor Burdened 8 25% Total Contract 1 Hours (or Rate Overhead (contract is 1 Direct Additional Service Amount Comment/Basis work units) (Average) Total at102% 9.22%) Costs Proposed Construction Consultation Senior Engineer 1 100 $140 $14,000 This is a standard fee rate $14,000 Subtotal Geotechnical Testing Costs t`,F5 EF 'I'm ` a-? $223,893 Tolal Proposal Number 5 ` wj},��'y`. _ :, :* r. $555,405 Page 5 of 5 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dale TOBd.0 Dr. 10/03/02 30/73/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Ran Number PDCO2-74 13 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Hardat Khublall, Engineer SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONTRACT NO. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates/ Montgomery Watson Harza for the preparation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement, Contract No. 2-41, for an amount not to exceed $420,000. SUMMARY Brown and Caldwell is proceeding with the further evaluation of the eight alignment alternatives and the final report is expected to be completed by February 2003. Since some of these alternatives were not addressed in the original 2000 final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and need to be addressed, staff was directed at the May 21, 2002 meeting of the Joint Management Committee (JMC)to prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP)for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) services. Further, due to the need to have the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) Relocation/ Protection completed prior to the Army Corps of Engineer's Prado Dam Project completion scheduled for summer 2006, Staff has recognized the importance of addressing the Environmental Impacts of all eight alternatives, to maintain an aggressive project schedule and have a final approved EIR/EIS that will address the selected project. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for the SARI Relocation and Protection Project, Contract No. 2-41, is $86,747,000. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Section 8, Page 14, FY2002/03) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) amass =rz Page 1 The funds for this Professional Service Agreement (PSA) will be provided from the project Consultant's PSA Budget. The total amount included in this authorization request is for an amount not to exceed $420,000. According to the 2002 Memorandum of Understanding between Orange County Sanitation District (District) and Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAW PA), SAWPA has the obligation to reimburse the District for 50% of the engineering fees and costs included in this PSA. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report was certified on July 19, 2000 and a Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 2000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Environmental Services HK:sa GAnlplobalWgenda Draft Reports\PDC\241 AR 100302.00c a..ua: Hasa Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR EIR/EIS CONTRACT NO. 2-41 ORIGINAL - CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED ' FUNDS THIS PROPOSED .ESTIMATED .ESTIMATED- PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED . PROJECT BUDGET RMSED AUTHORIZED. AUTHORIZATION 'TOTAL EXPENorrURE &FENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE" REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TOOATE(%) Project Development $ 17.000 $ 12.000 $ 12,000 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 12,259 72% Studies/Pernnifting $ 861.000 1 $ 861,000 $ 1,122.000 $ 1,122,000 $ 565,701 50% Consultant PSA $ 875,000 $ 9A78,000 $ 9,478,000 $ 4,606.273 It 420.000 $ 5,026.273 $ 3.860,936 77% Design Staff $ 366.200 $ 1,506,000 $ 11506,000 $ 831,000 $ 831,000 $ 485,835 58% Construction Contract $ 21,203,400 $ 54,006.000 $ 54.006,000 Construction Administration $ 1.262.300 $ 7,004,000 $ 7.004,000 Construction inspection $ 1.718,000 $ 3,000,000 1 1 $ 3.000,000 Contingency $ 6,088,400 $ 10.800,000 1 $ 10,880,000 PROJECTTOTAL $ 30,530,300 $ 86.747.000 $ 86,747,Ono $ 6,576,273 $ 420.000 It 6.996.273 $ 4,924,731 70% Reimbursable Casts $ 210,000 PROJECT NET 1 $ 30,530,300 1 $ 86,747,000 1 1 $ 86,747,000 1 1 $ 6,576,273 $ 210.000 $ 6.996,273 1$ 4,924,731 70% ` District is fronting this amount in anticipation of being re-imbursed. EDMS 003741494 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Santa Ana River Interceptor EIR/ EIS Contract No. 2-41 Total Project Budget: $49,787,000 Consultant: Environmental Science Associates Start Date of Project: October 23, 2002 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original Environmental Services for the preparation of PSA Santa Ana River Interceptor Environmental Impact $420,000 $420,000 Report (EIR)/ Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Contract 2-41 EDMS 003741493 CARleNo WIF1241 P$A$Wtu3 RS rL doc 09/24102 ReN3ed 05114M SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)/ENVIRONMENTAL - IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) CONTRACT NO. 2.41 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals, sent out on July 22, 2002: • Montgomery Watson Harza • Robert Bein William Frost &Associates • Michael Brandman Associates • Jones & Stokes • LSA Associates, Inc. • Environmental Science Associates PCR Services Corporation Proposals were received from three of the seven consulting firms on August 26, 2002 with two of the firms teaming up and submitting one proposal. Proposals were then distributed for review and ranking by both OCSD and SAWPA review panel. The review panel consisted of seven members. The Consultants were evaluated on August 16, 2002 based upon the proposals using a rating system from 1 to 10, 10 being the best, in six categories described below: 1. Proiect Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work (weight: 12). Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work (weight: 4). Rates the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Proiect Experience (weight: 7). Rates the team's overall total number of year's experience and roles performing environmental services as it relates directly to the preparation of EIR/EIS. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the preparation of EIR/EIS. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications (weight: 6). A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to preparation of EIR/EIS. 5. . Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants (weight: 3). Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant team. - 6. Proposed Schedule (weight: 3). Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule? Each Consultant's "List of Assumptions and Exceptions to the Scope of Work" were evaluated as to whether the assumptions and exceptions were acceptable. The two consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The review panel met on September 11, 2002 and discussed the results of the evaluation. The review panel again ranked both firms and invited them for an interview. The two-hour interviews were conducted with each of the consulting firms on September 17, 2002 and final ranking were compiled (see Table 1.0). Negotiation was held on September 19 & 20, 2002 with the top ranked consultant. The following summarizes the final ranking: 1. Environmental Science Associates / Montgomery Watson Harza (ESA/MWH).........................2071 POINTS 2. Michael Brandman Associates (MBA)..............................1814 POINTS The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the top ranked Consultant: ESA/MWH ESA/MWH had the highest ranked proposal based on the project approach, understanding of the Scope of Work, applicable project experience, and the team organization. ESA/MWH understanding and analysis of the project issues presented was better when compared to the other Consultant. ESA/MWH's Quality Assurance/ Quality Control (QA/QC) procedures were better. The staffs' qualification presented were good and ESA/MWH had better similar and most recent project experience. The proposed project teams, including the sub- consultants, were well organized, based upon specialties and division of work. 3. Fee Pr000sals After the final ranking of the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the two firms. The top ranked consultant, ESA/MW H, submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. ESA/MW H's fee proposal is 5% lower than the other Consultant's fee proposal submitted. Staff recommends the team of Environmental Science Associates and Montgomery Watson Harza be awarded the PSA for the preparation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor EIR/EIS, for a total fee not to exceed $420,000. TABLE 1.0 Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Environmental Impact Report (EIR)IEnvironmental Impact Statement (EIS) Contract No. 2-41 OCSD/SAWPA EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Firm ESA/MWH Michael Brandman Associates Reviewer A 285 273 Reviewer B 324 320 Reviewer C 287 239 Reviewer D 289 271 Reviewer E 271 205 Reviewer F 290 178 Reviewer G 325 328 Total Score 2071 1814 Average Score 296 259 350 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 3658 4205 Man-hours 100% Design Completion 61 60 Proposed Weeks Proposed No to Exceed $420,116 $442,227 Fee EDMS 003741495 / PDC COMMITTEE Ml:ng Date T01%011Dlr. ]0103102 10/23/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCO2-75 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Engineer SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE ODOR CONTROL PROGRAM EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT, JOB NO. J-71-4 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Final Comprehensive Odor Control Program Evaluation and Improvement Report (A.K.A. Odor Control Master Plan), Job No. J-71-4, dated July 31, 2002, prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. SUMMARY • During the Strategic Planning Process in 1999, public comments were received that focused on the increasing number of odor complaints from the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) treatment and collections facilities. • In February 2000, OCSD retained CH2M Hill, Inc. to perform the Comprehensive Odor Control Program Evaluation and Assessment project and prepare a project report. The report is on file in the OCSD Engineering Library. CH2M Hill, Inc. submitted the Final Project Report in July 2002. • The results of the Odor Control Assessment will be presented at the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 2001-02, Page 103) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1 Also the attached Odor Control Master Plan "executive summary" provides an overview. of the project and recommendations. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None Required ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Odor Control Master Plan Executive Summary JB:sa G:WglobaMgenda D2(t Repa \PDGU-714 Final Report ARA= 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE COMPREHENSIVE ODOR CONTROL PROGRAM EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT JOB NO. J-71-4 hp 4 Project Development 0% Studies/Permitting $ 485.000 $ 995,000 Is 995.000 995.000 995.000 $ 995,000 100% Consultant PSA 0% Design Staff $ 621 000 $ 310,000 $ 310.000 310,000 310,000 $ 300,069 97% Construction Contract 0% Construction Administmflon p<< 0% Construction Inspection 0% Contingency $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6.000 0% 2, IPROJECT TOTAL $ 1,112,000 $ 11,311,000 $ 1.311,000, $ 1,305,000 $ 1,305.000 $ 1,295,069 , 99% lReimbursable Costs i $ - 01 1 1 1 1 :0% 1PROJECT NET $ 1.112.000 $ 1.311.000 1 $ 1.311.000l.d $ 1130,0001 1$ 1,305.000 1$ 1,295.0691 997 C:WlMWWlPqJ-71-4 IMT h:%wp,dW1ettg1bms% ,a1 table Odor Control Master Plan Fact Sheet This Odor Control Master Plan(OCMP)integrates all odor-control facilities owned and operated by Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)including. • Two wastewater treatment plants,and - • Countywide collection system The principal objective of the OCMP was to evaluate the edsting comprehensive odor- control program and to provide recommendations for further improvements. Wastewater Treatment Plants A comprehensive evaluation of the odor-control systems at Plant 1 (PI) and Plant 2(P2)has been conducted in two master-planning phases,Phase 1 and Phase 2.The master-planting works included air sampling to identify odor sources,odor dispersion modeling to assess onsite and offsite odor impacts,and analysis of balanced liquid/vapor treatment Current odor-control operations and maintenance (O&M)practices and procedures were evaluated at both plants,and assessment of needed improvements for the solids storage facilities at Pl have been conducted.Finally,a number of odor-control alternatives have been developed and evaluated for application at both Pi and P2. A brief summary of the evaluation and recommendations is provided as follows. Air Sampling All significant odor sources at PI and P2 have been identified,and a comprehensive foul air sampling has been performed for this OCMP between May 22 and May 25,2000.The primary sampling targets were odor,organic reduced sulfur(ORS),hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia. Measured hydrogen sulfide emission rates were less than 10 pounds per day(1b/day)and less than 5lb/day at P2 and PI,respectively.The measured odors performed in May 2000 and in 1993 are presented in Table MPFS-1,showing the ranges of measured odor units (Oil).The air sampling was conducted during low-odor conditions,due to the time of year, requiring measured data to be scaled-up for assessing the worst-case conditions. TABLE MPFS-1 Measured Odor Ranges Odor,OU Plant May 2001 January-June 1993 r" Pi 19-9,315 16-370 P2 45-15,826 12-6.400 I"1993 Joint Emission Inventory Program oOOa COMneL tMSIEa FACT SHEET TDOrMMI 1 ODOR CONTROL MASTER PIANFACT SHEET Odor Dispersion Modeling Odor dispersion has been modeled at Pl and P2 for both baseline and future full-secondary conditions. Additional odor control was estimated to bring both plants into compliance with the targeted zero offsite exceedance and to reduce emission of hydrogen sulfide (HiS-equivalent)below the targeted threshold of 10 parts per billion by volume(ppbv).The odor dispersion modeling summary follows. Pl.It is determined that reduction of 1-12S-equivalent concentrations of the scrubber exhaust _ air from the current 0.5 parts per million by volume(ppmv) to 0.4 ppmv for the Primary Clarifier Scrubber Complex and from the current 0.5 ppmv to 0.35 ppmv for the Headwork Scrubber Complex is required. No additional control for baseline conditions beyond those described above is deemed necessary for the future full-secondary conditions. P2.Additional control to reduce HySequivalent concentrations of the scrubber exhaust air from the current 0.5 ppmv to 0.15 ppmv for the North Scrubber Complex,and to reduce H2S-equivalent exhaust concentrations for the South Scrubber Complex from the current 0.5 ppmv to 0.3 ppmv is required at current air volumes.Additional control of new Waste Sidestream Clarifier emissions is necessary for future full-secondary conditions to reduce about 95 percent of the H2S equivalent emission. Plant 0&M Evaluation A comprehensive evaluation of the current O&M practices was conducted for the Pl and P2 odor control facilities during the Phase 1 master-planning effort.OCSD has been implementing many of the improvements recommended in the evaluation.The recommendations of each process area are Summarized in the following section. Hydrogen Peroxide: Further automation of the hydrogen peroxide feed system,integration of the newly installed Vapex units into the overall control system,and links to CRISP are recommended to optimize chemical usage and to manage the foul air peaks and flow patterns. Foul Air Scrubbers:Convert the odor-control scrubbers at Pl and P2,currently being operated as caustic-only absorption systems,to include oxidant addition.Apply hydrogen peroxide at headworks and primary clarifiers,and sodium hypochlorite for solids-related scrubbers Stone Drains and Manholes:The current abatement program provides a sound storm drain and manhole management practice.Proceed with the storm drain and manhole database development.Provide letter designations in the manhole tagging system to identify the manholes to be sealed. Sludge Drying Beds:Develop written guidelines for managing the operation of the drying beds at both plants and,if feasible,divert sewer line debris and imported sludge to the Pl drying beds for processing. Launder Level:Modify the existing May valves and continue proper sealing of the covers to minimize H2S off-gassing. Replacement of the dome covers with flat covers is recommended for circular primary basins. 2 000RCONTROL MASTER PIANFACT SHEET I.DOG MIMI OCORCCMROLWSTERPLAHFACTSHEET - Foul Air Capture:Rehabilitate and,as needed,replace the existing ductwork,plenums, dampers,fans,and condensate drainage systems across both treatment plants.Balance the air ventilation systems. Odor-Control Maintenance:Improvements based on best management practices (BMPs)for the scrubbers,hydrogen peroxide system,foul air capture systems,and storm drain system are recommended. Manpower estimates are provided to assist OCSD in defining staffing requirements,and recommended preventive maintenance procedures are outlined.See TM 1.4.7 for details regarding odor-control maintenance. - Odor Complaint/Resolution Procedures:Consolidate the complaint tracking methodology and create one database for all odor complaints for Pl,P2,and the Collection System. Expand the odor complaint database to include non-0051)odors. Balance of Liquid and Vapor Treatment Balancing of liquid H25 treatment in the collection system and vapor H2S treatment at the two treatment plants has been evaluated.Considering odor control at the plants only and assuming all odor-control facilities at Pl and P2 are operating at required efficiencies,it would be most cost efficient to control H2S by existing vapor treatment(i.e.scrubbers). However,considering other benefits,such as corrosion protection and odor control in the collection facilities and potential savings in the main treatment processes at Pl and P2,it is cost benefidal to maintain H2S liquid concentrations in a range from 0.4 milligrams per liter (mg/L) to 0.7 mg/L entering the plant.To accomplish these concentrations,an approximate 60 to 90 percent reduction of liquid H2S would be necessary upstream of the plant. Recently,OCSD successfully completed testing of Peroxide Regenerated Iron-Sulfide (PRIS)control technology in several sewer trunklines.Treatment efficiency and cost benefits of this technology have been proven,and OCSD intends to implement this technology in the collection system.Further evaluation of this technology is recommended for dosing PRIS into the interplant sewer trunkline at Pl (M&D facility) to improve efficiency and to minimize costs of odor control at P2. Solids Storage Improvements Elevated odor emission from the truck loading area at the Solids Storage Facility has a negative impact on the overall onsite and offsite level of odors at Pl.Trucks not frilly contained when receiving dewatered solids loads and imbalance of the exhaust and supply air in the truck loading area are identified causes of this problem. Extension of the truck loading area and addition of a roll-up door at the east entrance are recommended improvements that will substantially mitigate odor problem.A second exhaust fan is needed to ensure that air is continuously drawn into the truck loading area preventing fugitive odors. 131 and P2 Odor-Control Alternatives Alternatives API-7 and AP2-12,consisting of a combination of biotowers and wet scrubbers, are recommended odor-control alternatives for PI and P2,respectively. ODOR 0XRROL MASTER PM FACT SHEET I= 3 O00RWWMLMASTERF FACTSHEET P1, Recommended Alternative API-7 Key facilities associated with the proposed alternative are as follows: - • Foam media biotowers for trunkline scrubbers that provide roughing treatment prior to .the headworks scrubber • Oxidant-based single-stage wet scrubbers for the headworks and primary clarifier complexes • Biotowers for dewatering and Dissolved Au Flotation Thickeners(DAFT)complexes A summary of construction costs for the recommended odor-control alternative API-7, including the costs for additional odor controls due to future full-secondary treatment,is presented in Table MPFS-2. TABLE MPFa-2 Summary of Construction Costs for Alternative AP1-7 Odor-Control Facilities Odor-Control Facility Construction Cost Heedworks/Trunkline $5,526,000 Primary $5,644,000 Dewatering $9,032,000 DAFT $5,352,000 Full Secondary—Additional Facilities $11.625,000 P2, Recommended Altemative AP2.12 Key facilities associated with the proposed alternatives are as follows: • Foam biotowers for trunkline scrubbers • Rehabilitate the bmnkline and associated North Complex scrubbers to handle foul au from the new P2-66 trunklme and diversion structures • Two-stage wet scrubbers for the North Scrubber Complex • Single-stage wet scrubbers for the South Scrubber Complex • Two-stage wet scrubbers for the new P2-66 headworks scrubber complex • Biotowers for dewatering,solids handling,and DAFT scrubber complexes • Volatile organic compound(VOC)-controlling carbon scrubbers for the new P2-66 scrubber complex A summary of construction costs for the recommended odor-control alternative AP2-12, including the costs for additional odor controls due to future full-secondary treatment,is presented in Table MPFS-3. _ 4 OWRCOHTROL MASTER P FACT SHEET IDW 022140p01 ODORCOMMMp RPUNFACTWEET TABLE MPFS 7 Summary of Construction Costs for Alternative AP2.12 Odor-Control Facilities Odor Control Facility Construction Cost Headmrks $34,279,000 Nonhrfrunkline $16,526,000 South $5,6a5,000 Dmatenng $9.962.000 Solids Handling $8.112,000 DAFT $5.352,000 Full Secondary—Additional Facilities $16,977.000 P2 Variance Atematives Based on recommendations from the Odor Summit 3,held by 005D on April 9,2002,the recommended odor control alternative for P2 has been further refined and two new variances to the proposed Alternative AP2-12,AP2-12a and AP2-12b,have been developed. Variance AP2-12a includes replacement of the proposed two-stage wet scrubbers and VOC-controlling carbon scrubbers with foam biotowers,followed by single-vessel two-stage wet scrubbers.Variance AP2-12a offers a reduction in overall costs,including a reduction in construction costs of$55 million. Variance AP2-12b includes replacement of the proposed two-stage wet scrubbers and VOCcontrolling carbon scrubbers with a foam biotower,followed by a single-stage oxidant-based wet scrubber,and it provides a reduction in overall cost,including a reduction in construction costs of$8.7 million. There is uncertainty that the foam biotowers in combination with the single-stage wet scrubbers could meet the stringent emission requirement of removing odorous gases from foul air down to HySequivalent concentrations to 0.15 ppm.To address this issue,a pilot testing of the foam biotower-wet scrubber process train is recommended to confirm the assumed performance and to establish valid design criteria if variance AP2-12b is selected for implementation - Lov+�Cost Altematives The recommended4lternatives API-7 and AP2-12 are not the lowest_cost alternatives. Alternatives AP14 at PI and AP2-5 at P2 are the low-cost alternatives. Both alternatives assume foam biotowers for all odor-control scrubbers across Pi and P2.The foam biotower is not industry-standard technology,and design criteria,sizing,and cost estimates are based on the research project,which is currently conducted by 005D. To accept these alternatives for implementation,extended pilot testing of 1 to 2 years is recommended to establish reliable design and performance criteria.An additional 2 to 3 years of pilot testing is recommended to"catch up" a media replacement cycle and to _ establish confidence in long-term reliable performance. ODOR C0WIWX MASTER IWlFACTSNEEr 1.000 5 ' MR CONTROL MASTER PM FACT SHEET - Collection System A comprehensive evaluation of the O&M procedures and practices for the OCSD-wide - collection system was completed during the master-planning Phase 1.More than half of ' OCSD's main sewer trunk lines were modeled,and demonstration tests to chemically reduce H2S was conducted. 0&M Evaluation Biological and physical odor-generation attributes have been analyzed,and current O&M policies and procedures,including system inspection,preventive maintenance,and odor complaint investigation,were evaluated. Historically,very high H2S vapor concentrations,above 200 ppmv into the headspace of the Miller Holder Trunkline,Knott Interceptor,and Baker-Main sewer trunkline,were documented during previous evaluations.Similarly,high ranges of 90 ppmv to 200 ppmv of H2S vapor concentrations were documented into the other main sewer trunklines. O&M and design control strategies have been analyzed for controlling the odors in the collection system.As a result, the following odor-control program is recommended. • Develop and implement an 18-month-cycle cleaning program. • Continue implementing current liquid,vapor,and wastewater bulk characteristic sampling program Perform a wastewater sampling during hot summer days to establish diurnal peaking data. • Continue implementing design and construction control practices for new and remodeled facilities. • Develop geographic information system(GIS)maps for sealed manhole locations. • Develop and implement liquid H2S control based on the most recent testing results. Collection System Modeling A spreadsheet-based model to predict transport,generation,and fate of the liquid and vapor HzS in the collection system was developed.Baker-Main,Bushard-Magnolia,Coast, Euclid,Knott,Miller Holder,and Newport sewer systems were modeled applying the gravity flow and force main flow models.The models were calibrated using measured data provided by CKSD,and modeling results were analyzed.For most of the trunklines,the measured data coincided with the modeled HyS trends. Collection System Demonstration Test A series of demonstration tests have been performed,and the testing results were evaluated during the Phase 1 master-planning effort to demonstrate efficiency of different chemicals to control odors in the collection system.Eight demonstration tests were performed adding hydrogen peroxide,biocide,calcium nitrate,magnesium hydroxide,and ferrous chloride in wastewater into the Knott,Baker-Main,Miller Holder,and Newport tmnklfnes. - 6 =R CONTROL MASTER PIAN FACT SHEET 1.=012IMI ' OOORCONTROI IMSTER RIAN FACE SHEET Hydrogen peroxide was effective to treat HaS.However,additional step feed is necessary for long tnmklines to further reduce the vapor-phase H25 concentrations. Calcium nitrate,magnesium hydroxide,and ferrous chloride showed a potential to reduce _ HrS.Additional evaluation and testing are recommended to refine the treatment approach using calcium nitrate and magnesium hydroxide to achieve vapor-phase treatment targets. Additional recently completed testing confirmed high efficiency and costbenefits of using intermittent feed of ferrous chloride and hydrogen peroxide,a PRIS trade-name technology. Organizational Approach With an objective to optimize activities and assess labor needs of the odor-control facilities, current organizational aspects were evaluated and identified improvements are proposed. The highlights of the findings and recommendation for improvements follow. OCSD has 18 full-time employees(FTE) dedicated to collection and treatment systems at their odor-control facilities.This is approximately 20 percent less than 23 FTE,which is the peer-agency average.At the same time,the quantity and quality of OCSD's odor-control equipment and facilities meets or exceeds industry standards.To maximize benefits of the available odor-control facilities and to meet the"zero complaints" goal,it is recommended that OCSD increase or otherwise redirect up to five more employees dedicated to odor control. Other organizational improvements,such as developing written odor-control policies and practices to clearly define lines of responsibilities for various functional groups and to improve communication between departments and divisions,are recommended. The current reactive approach to the odor-control issues is recommended to be changed with a reactive approach that will minimize or even prevent odor-control problems and odor complaints.A more proactive approach of all stakeholders and management is advised. Capital Improvement Program Only implementation scheduling components of the Capital Improvements Program(CIP) are developed in this OCMP.The related budgetary information for the master-planned projects and facilities is available in the most recent CIP Budget,which is updated annually by OCSD. The proposed CIP schedule assumes that implementation of all Master Plan odor-control projects will last until year 2008. Implementation of the Odor-Control Rehabilitation Project J-71-8 is scheduled to be completed in August 2008,6 months after completion of the P2-66 project.The following are proposed J-71-8 implementation phases: • Project development until September 2002 • Study and prelinunary design from October 2002 until June 2003 • Detailed design from July 2003 until September 2004 • Bid and construction award from October 2004 until February 2005 • Fl improvements from March 2005 until June 2007 • P2 improvements from March 2005 until August 2008 - ODOR CONTROL MASTER RAN FACT SHEET IM r OOOR CMTROL WSTER PUN FACT SHEET Implementation of the other Joint Works odor-control projects,including Junction Boxes (J-71-1 and J-71-2),Modification for Odor Control Q-71-3),and Scrubber Monitoring and Control Project Q-71-7),is scheduled by OCSD to be completed by May 2003. Because the related projects were not fully defined at this time,an implementation schedule for-the odor-control collection system is not included in this OCMP. S OOORCONTRU MASTER PLAN FACT SHEET tMOOVIM1 i Draft MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on October 9, 2002, at 5:00 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Brian Brady, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Roy Moore, Vice Chair Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Brian Donahue Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering John M. Gullixson Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Mark Leyes Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager James W. Silva Mike White, Controller Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Jan Collins, Sr. Human Resources Analyst Sonja Wassgren Directors Absent: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager Joy Neugebauer Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Steve Anderson,Vice Board Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel Brad Hogin,Assistant General Counsel Mike Markus, OCWD Don Hughes Toby Weissert Randy Fuhrman Joey Racano (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Chair Brady announced that Item 12(a)and Item 16, Closed Session,would be considered immediately following public comments. The remaining items listed on the agenda would be considered following the reconvening of the Committee. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 October 9, 2002 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Joey Racano mentioned various issues he thought the District was mismanaging. He stated a representative of the URS Corporation advised him the District was dumping tertiary treatment into the Talbert Marsh. However, since he knew that the District doesn't utilize tertiary treatment, he alleged the District Is using bleach on the plume to eliminate that from beach closure consideration, and is feeding bacteria into Talbert Marsh. Randy Fuhmran addressed various issues regarding the GWRS agreement. He noted that although the PDC Committee voted in favor of the agreement,three of the four votes were representatives of the Joint Cooperative Committee who had already approved the agreement. He urged the Directors to closely examine paragraphs 30, 56 and 59. He was opposed to the District paying 50%of all construction costs, as some of those costs would be for facilities that contribute to reduced operating costs and the District will not benefit from these savings. (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR02.94 Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36,Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Blake Anderson reported that the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District approved the project budget adopted in March 2001. The budget was based on early design work (referred to as the 30% design level). He said that increased estimates at this time are not unexpected as the design is nearly completed and that some of the costs are offset by additional grant money that was not anticipated in 2001. On August 21, revised project costs of $427 million were presented at a joint workshop with both agencies. The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement was being reviewed by the three standing committees, and will be considered for approval at the October Board meeting. Mr.Anderson stated that the PDC Committee recommended approval of the agreement. However, they did not take action on the increased budget costs. Mike Markus, GWRS construction project manager, explained the reasons for the increase in capital costs from March 2001 of$352 million to an updated budget amount in October 2002 of $453.9 million. He advised that a project cost control system would be implemented that would include a detailed monthly project report distributed to the directors. He reviewed the three major components for the increased budget costs: escalation, contingency,and design changes. Brad Hogin,Assistant General Counsel, provided the directors with an overview of the agreement. He stated that the agreement is better and stronger now. The basic terms of the agreement,which only covers Phase 1 facilities, were reviewed. He reported the agreement sufficiently protects the interests of both agencies while strongly incentivizing the agencies' long-term participation in the project. (16) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 6:50 p.m.pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item Nos. 16(ax1), (2), (3)and (4). Confidential Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 October 9, 2002 Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There was no reportable action taken by the Committee re Agenda Item Nos. 16(a)(1), (2), (3)and (4). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 7:04 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair had no report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance had no report. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. 18) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager had no report. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The Chair ordered that the September 18, 2002 minutes for the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved, as mailed. b. FAHR02-85: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2002. C. FAHR02-86: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 October 9, 2002 d. FAHR02-87: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of September 25, 2002. e. FAHR02-88: Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. f. FAHR02-89: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve revised SAFETY-POL 101, and SAFETY-POL 202,as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the Districfs Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. g. FAHR02-90: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02- , Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (9)under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR02-91: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02- , Declaration of Official Intent to Reimburse Certain of the District's Capital Reserve Funds for Expenditures Made in Advance for FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Projects from Proceeds of a Future Long-Tenn Financing. MOTION: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. FAHR02-92: Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1) Establish a budget of$200,000 for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment, Specification No. CS-2002-112BD; and, (2) Authorize the General Manager to solicit bids and subsequently award a Consultant Services Agreement for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment, Specification No. CS-2002-112BD, in an amount not to exceed $200,000. Lisa Murphy reported on the need for a strategic plan for the communications division. An ascertainment of needs and expectations of the community would be the beginning steps in forming a strategic plan. Several issues needed to be considered, as well as a variety of internal and external audiences targeted. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 October 9, 2002 In response to Directors' questions on cost, it was explained the$200.000 cost was a cap and the majority of the dollars would be targeted for advertising, direct mail, and other associated costs for audience outreach. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. FAHR02-93: Direct staff to include a tax-exempt commercial paper program as a part of the District's long term financial plan in order to reduce the costs of borrowing and most efficiently size long-term certificate of participation issues. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the item. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for November 13, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:33 p.m. Submitted by: / Penny M. I le FAHR Committee Seedtary G:Iwy.dtaWgeMs�FAHRIFAHR2002=2 Minul 100902 FAFIR Minu es.Eoc e FAHR COMMITTEE MeetlngDate Toatl.ofDir. 10/09/02- 30/23/02 AGENDA REPORT 1t NUMWr I HWn NUMW FAHR02-M 14( ) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2002 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2002. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO) serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Liquid Operating Monies and on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for of the Long-Term Operating Monies, there is an investment policy compliance issue pertaining to the holding of two securities that had an acceptable rating at the time of purchase but have since fallen below the minimum rating allowed by the investment policy. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The first security is the holding of$1 million par of the Public Service Co. of Colorado corporate bond with an April 2003 maturity, whose rating with S&P has remained at BBB+ by S&P, but has fallen with Moody's from A3 to BAA1. PIMCO believes that the company has sufficient asset coverage to cover debt as well as the ability to issue first mortgage debt to meet its 2003 debt maturities, if required, and the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if this security was sold now. The second compliance issue pertains to the holding of a United Airlines (UAL)Asset Backed Security whose rating from Moody's has fallen twice, first from A3 to BA1, and then to BA3. Likewise, the rating from Standard & Poor's has also fallen twice, first from A-to BBB, and then to BB. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District again would suffer an unwarranted G,Wq.EYVOenLBovE Mxtle Fro��oaz BmNRpmAa RepwlttOpZtlem uIc1.TPEASFM.ax Page t loss if this security was sold. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of"credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market("mark-to-markef)as of the . last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and.anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The following table details the book balances of the District's investment accounts at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown on the attached bar chart. ew.p.avapmmvumsuRxoozzm:noem.R"R""Wz JRe RRta« Page 2 Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts September 30,2002 Yield(%) State of Cellf.LAIF $ 31,242,124 2.59 Union Bank Checking Account 344,314 WA Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,317.000 1.10 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 43,817,450 3.40 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 313,648,355 5.10 Debt Service Reserves w/Trustees 35.600,516 4.57 Petty Cash _ 5,000 N/A TOTAL �25 979 7fin (1)This Is the annualized yield for the month of August. The September annualized rate was not available as of the data of this report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW G\VAMW,,cnda6AHRvAHVMW @ANIn F,0. 02 85 TRFASRPT.E Page 3 11 111 111 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iiiiiiiiiiiiiiimii '. • 11111111 i ME \\\\\\� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 111 111 ,,J• �j j ..;'4 . JISSViiS INN 1 111 111 '. 11 111 111 1 111 1 / 1 • . • 1 - 1 1 . 1 _ . 11 v Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund - September 30, 2002 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield' Balance September 1, 2002 $5,742,124 $5,742,124 $5,742,124 2.59 2.59 Deposits. 9/11/2002 32,300,000 32,300,000 32,300.000 2.69 2.59 Withdrawals: 9/4/2002 (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) 2.59 2.59 9/18/2002 (1,300,000) (1,300,000) (1,300,000) 2.59 2.59 9/27/2002 (4,000.000) (4,000,000) (4,000,000) 2.59 2.59 Total Wthdrawls (6,800,000) (6,800,000) (6,800,000) 2.59 2.59 Balance September 30, 2002 $31,242,124 $31,242,124 $31,242,124 2.59 2.59 Yield for the month of August 2002. The Yield for the month of September 2002 was not available as of the date of this report. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING ((or the month ended 30 September 2002) Page I of 2 Liquid Operating Monier(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $44,100,658 • Mellon $44,094,233 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $44,055,532 • Mellon $44,331,671 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.23 Of Index: 0.20 15.13 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)oft%Change: $101432 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Mamrin within 90 days: 621/e 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 2% 15.1.8 1 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No• 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.18 0.14 3 Months: 0.47 0.43 12 Months: 2.41 1.97 Year-to-Date: 1.66 1.31 Commentary Intercurntes atthe shortend of the yield curve decmaseddmingthe month(3mwth T-Bags fell 12 basis points m 1.5511a),w did longer matmities(30-year Treasuries fell 26 buis poin sto 4.67%). The liquid portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 4 basis points during the month,and by 35 basis points year4o date. PBdCO's emphasis on higheryielding securitiessucM1 as wmmcrcialpeperendshort-term notes enhancedretums. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ended 30 September 2002) Page 2 of *Compliance Issues: $1 million par of Public Service Co. of Colorado (7444481319), 6.0%coupon,4/15/2003 maturity,representing 2.3%of the portfolio holdings,was purchased on 6/28/2002 with ratings of BBB+by S&P and A3 by Moody's. It was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAAI on 9/6/2002 while the S&P rating has remained unchanged. The District's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The following points provide background information on the security as well as our basis for recommending to hold the issue: • Public Service Co. of Colorado (PS Colorado)is an operating utility owned by XCEL Energy. While there are near-term liquidity risks at the parent company level, PIMCO does not foresee the same problems at the utility operating company level as PS Colorado has strong stand-alone credit metrics. • PS Colorado faces bank line maturities of$600 million in June 2003,which is two months after the April 2003 bond maturity. PIMCO believes the company has ample capacity to issue first mortgage debt to meet these maturities,if it were required. • PIMCO recommends holding this bond based on sufficient asset coverage to cover debt and the ability of the company to issue first mortgage debt to roll over its 2003 debt maturities, if needed. PIMCO will monitor the company's access to the capital markets and power markets very closely. • If the security was sold at the lowest price currently available (99.51575 per IFTC),the portfolio would realize a loss of$4,825 (approximately 1 basis point given the total portfolio value). However,as detailed above, PIMCO believes the bonds will pay off at par(100.0) at maturity next April. • PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. If anything changes that would prompt them to revise their recommendation or the security's inclusion within the District's portfolio,they will notify staff and take the appropriate action. c:iwmymnro:.umn.�yywgasoaw:.a.xrrm MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 September 2002) 'Page I oJ1 Lang-Term Operating Mania(103) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $317,839,471 • Mellon $317,803,737 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $332,682,008 • Mellon $303,031,674 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.49 Of Index: 2.33 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change; $7 914 03 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 11% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No. 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Rehm(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1.31 1.27 1 Month: 3.47 3.44 3 Months: 12 Months: 7.09 6.86 Year-to-Date: 6.94 6.48 • Thmemonth yields declined duringthe month(90day T-Bd is Ica 12 buds points to 1.551%)as did longer meturides(5-yearTreuury Noes fe1166 bests points to 2.56%). • The Long-Term pmtfollo outperformed the bench nt rk by4 buds points dormathe month,and 46 buds poinn yeo40dale. • Positioning the portfolio with near4ndu durnim by P134C0 was neutral for perfomsance. • A neu4ndex curve p nitiondngwas neutral for returns. • Mungege-backd securities dcb Wd from pertormance a the sector modestly underperfmned simdludurndm Treasuries. • M undendeight allocation to cmporetes was pueulw for perfmmnnce as the sector lagged Treasuries. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 September 2002) Page 2 of 2 *Compliance Issues: $1,600,000 par of United Airlines Pass-Through 2001-1-C(909317BC2),6.831%coupon,9/1/2008 maturity,representing 0.3%of the portfolio holdings-was purchased on 8110/2001;and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BA I (on 9/18/2001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 9202001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BA I to BA3(on 12212001)and by S&P from BBB to BB(on 628/02). The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. With respect to the UAL holding,PIMCO's recommendation for the issue has not changed,even in light of recent events. They are of the opinion that the spread, collateral,and issuer liquidity all point to continuing to hold the security. The following points provide basis for thew recommendation: • foremost,PIMCO continues to believe that UAL will be able to avoid filing for bankruptcy. Almost all major US airlines have sufficient liquidity and unencumbered assets to survive today's bleak industry conditions. UAL is the second largest carrier in the world,and they believe that the company(and the industry)will survive. • Of all the major airlines,UAL's employees have the greatest incentives to provide labor concessions. Relative to its pars,UAL is unique in several aspects: employees own 55%of the company's stock its pilots are the highest paid and its operating performance/management rank near the bottom. After having lost$2.1 billion in 2001 and$850 million through the first half of 2002,UAL has hit the point where changes are urgently required. • UAL employees have three sources of significant exposure in the event of a UAL bankruptcy filing:(1)Possibility that UAL will renege on its existing labor agreements;(2)Significant underfunding of UAL's employee post-retirement plan;and(3)Significant employee equity stake in UAL(55%of stock). These are powerful motivators to provide concessions and avoid bankruptcy. • In addition,the collateral underlying the bonds is good(very young planes,medium to high aircraft diversification,loan-to-value ratio is 60-75°/y etc.). • Finally,PIMCO believes liquidation values continue to be much higher than reflected in current market prices. Current pricing levels overstate the risks. • If the security was said at the lowest price currently available(50.886 per IDC),the portfolio would realize a loss of$786,144(approximately 25 basis points given the total portfolio value). However,as detailed above,PIMCO believes the fair market value of the issue is much higher than currently reflected in the market. This is a conservative loss estimate. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. If anything changes that would prompt them to revise their recommendation on the inclusion of the security within the portfolio,they will let us know to take appropriate action. Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: •$4,500,000 par of Daimler Chrysler securities(cusip 233835AM9),maturing on December 16,2002,representing 1.3%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/312001 by S&P from A-to BBB+;and now carry a Moody's rating of A3. The District investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$9,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities(345397GV9,345397RV7,345397S13,345397SR5),maturing at various dates in 2003,2004,and 2005,represents 2.60/6 of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;and now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade (from A2)on 1/162002. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB in the event of a split rating. •$11,750,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(370425QV5,37042 WESO,37042WZK0),maturing in 2003,represents 3.4%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;and continue to carry a Moody's rating of A2. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$3,000,000 par of Baltimore Gas&Electric wcurities(059165DN7),maturing in 2012,represents 0.9%of the portfolio holdings. The security Was downgraded on , 7/182002 by S&P from A to BBB+,but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A2. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. G:Iwp.drayrtD201wh/1el7keam,y Mgm 1L-70800-02-09.RPT.doo Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 30-SEP-2002 FINAL L7 UID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 6,578,487.94 6,578,487.94 14.92% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS- 3,38Z428.47 5,38Z428.47 12,21% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 6,772,130.56 6,772,150.56 15.36% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 4.IK433.89 4,186,433.89 9.49% 0.00 MUTUALFUNDS 2,266,238.93 2,266,238.93 5,14% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 25,185,739.69 25,185,739.69 57.12% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 25,185,739.69 2SIK739.69 57.12% 0.00 +FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 6,219,531.25 6,105,000.00 13.85% -114.531.25 U.S.AGENCIES 3,259,313.91 3,235,992.60 7.34% -23,331.21 BANKING&FINANCE 7,339,983.79 7,268,777.62 16.48% -71.206.17 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 2,050,320.00 2,021,950.00 4.59% -28.370:00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 18,869,148.85 19,631,710.22 42.25% -237.438.63 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 18,869,148.85 18,631,710.22 42.25% -237,438.63 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 276,782.93 276,782.93 0,63% 0.00 TOTAL, 276.782.93 276.792.93 0.63% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 276,792.93 276,7UM 0.63% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 44,331,671.47 44,IN4,212A4 100.00% -237,438.63 08-0c62002 7:19:56 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 1 WE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-SEP-2002 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 5,248,393.24 5,248,39124 1.65% 0.00 PAYABLES -39,149,062.50 -39,149,062.50 -12.32% 0.00 TOTAL 33,900,669.26 -33,900,669.26 -10.67% 0.00 UNITED STATES OTHER U.S.GOVT OBLIGATIONS 2,888,359.72 2,888,359.72 0.91% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 160,281 A0 160,281.40 0.05% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 3,049,641.12 3,048,641.12 0.96% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS -30,852,028.14 -30,852,029.14 -9.71% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 134,591,145.99 138,469,311.28 43.57% 3,878,165.39 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,225,006.27 35,519,737.49 11.18% 6,293,731.22 U.S.AGENCIES 43,374,984.27 46,432,003.79 14.61% 3,057,019.52 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 18,660,067.33 19,299,749.57 6.07% 629,682.24 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 7,536,756.31 7,728,055.69 2.43% 191,299.38 FHLMC POOLS 1,057,852.79 1,057,684.01 0.33% 468.78 FHLMC MULTICLASS 3,658,534.70 3,685,458.82 1.16% 26,924.12 FNMA POOLS 23,656,975.00 23,817,827.50 7.49% 160,952.50 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 3,406,447.58 3,712,243.90 1.17% 305,796.32 ABS:CAR LOAN 319,611.30 315,723.50 0.10% -3,887.80 ABS:AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.00 856,384.00 0.27% -743,616.00 BANKING&FINANCE 30,680,594.50 30,950,110.50 9.74% 269,516.00 INDUSTRIAL 17,266,985.00 17,437,139.00 5.49% 170,154.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 11,627,710.00 12,122,865.00 3.81% 495,155.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 3,063,750.00 3,105,090.00 0.98% 41,340.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 329,726,320.94 344,498,394.05 108A0% 14,772,063.11 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 329,726,32094 344,499,384.05 108.40% 14,772,063.11 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 08-Oct-2002 7.21:13 Executive WoRbench ^ ai Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 2 NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY BASE. USD OCSFV7522202 30-SEP-2002 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,157,381.18 4,157,391.18 1.31% 0.00 TOTAL 4,157,381.18 4,157,391.19 1.31% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,157,331.18 4,157,381.19 131% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 303,031,673.98 3179803,737.09 100.00% 14,772,063.11 08-Oct-1002 7.21.13 Ev thv Workbench d, YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PASS S 1 O OP07511102 2002/09/30 RON DATE , 10/04/02 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINS S 10.21.58 .ea».......................... ..........................e. ..........==....................... PAN VALUE YTH AT CURRENT NODDY HARHET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE RRAKET VALUE 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASE 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 2,266,238.93 DRRYFUS TREASURY CABS RGHT .000 1.574 AAA 100.000 2,266,238.93 8.99 996085247 AAA 2,266,226.93 5.17 1,500,000.00 FBDREAL NONE LN UPS CORP DISC 1.654 .000 P-1 99.775 1,496,631.25 5.94 31139IJ77 HAT 10/0B/2002 A-1+ 1,496,631.25 2.42 2,000,000.DO FEDERAL ROVE LN BR CONS DISC N 1.606 .000 P-1 99.659 1,993,1B6.67 7.91 31330SR65 HAT 12/02/2002 A-1+ 1,993,106.67 4.SS 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LH HTG CORP DISC 1.693 .000 P-1 99.812 990,122.22 3.96 313397N31 HAT 11/05/20D2 A-1+ 990,122.22 2.20 5,800,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RED ASSN DISCOUNT 1.697 .000 P-1 99.577 5,775,495.00 22.93 313589U43 HAT 12/24/2002 A-1+ 5,775,495.00 13.16 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BR CONS DISC 1.705 .000 P-1 99.693 2,193,247.22 0.70 31338SQ41 HAT 11/22/2002 A-la 2,193,247.22 5.01 2,900,000.00 FEDERAL BONN LN RIG CORP DISC 1.707 .000 P-1 99.575 2,807,675.00 11.46 313397SB5 RAT 12/12/2002 A-1+ 2,BB7,675.00 6.59 900,000.00 DO PONT DE HEROES DISC 1.723 .000 P-1 99.799 798,394.67 3.17 263S4BR43 10/04/2002 798,394.67 1.02 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HATL NTG ASSN DISCOUNT 1.726 .ODO P-1 99.666 996,655.56 3.95 313599H41 RAT 11/06/2002 A-1+ 996,665.56 2.27 1,500,000.00 USRA CAN CONS DISC 1,732 .000 P-1 99.094 1,498,414.17 5.94 90328BR42 10/04/2002 1,498,414.17 3.42 I,800,000.00 DOLDRAN SACHS LP DISC 1.747 .000 P-1 99.623 1,793,214.00 7.11 38142ULN0 11/22/2002 1,793,214.00 4.09 1,500,000.00 AHIRICAN EX CR CP DISC 1.751 .000 99.391 1,490,065.00 5.91 G25818RS7 01/22/2003 1,490,065.00 3.40 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE [ 2 OCSF07511102 2002/09/30 RUN DATE [ 10/04/02 DISTRICT[ LIQUID OPERATING RON TIME [ 10.21.58 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT NODDY RARNET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 1.804 .000 P-1 99.760 997,600.00 3.96 63743DML 11/13/2002 997,600.00 2.20 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASE 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 1.441 .239 25,185,739.69 100.00 25,185,739.69 57.48 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH SR HT .000 2.008 "1 99.988 1,502,520.00 8.04 046003REI PLTG RT 05/08/2003 DD 05/08/00 AA- 1,499,820.00 3.42 125,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NYO ASSN MTN .000 1.845 AAA 100.062 124,960.94 .67 3136FOYW6 VAR RT 02/21/2003 DO O0/22101 AAA 125,077.50 .29 11500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BOB 1.714 6.337 AAA IOO.S94 1'519r035.00 8.09 3133NCHP5 6.375E 11/15/2002 DO I1/0B/00 AAA I.S08r910.00 3.44 466,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTC ASBN =69 1.810 4.938 AAA 101.250 471,764.42 2.53 31359Mh4 5.0001 02/14/2003 DD 02/23/01 AAA 471,825.00 1.09 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO NT 1.949 6.987 AA2 103.042 560,601.00 2.99 R49740CUS 7.200E 05/01/2003 DO 04/26/00 AI 556,426.90 1.27 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 2.048 6.090 A2 101.669 615,984.00 3.27 073902826 6.2001 03/30/2003 DD 03/30/98 A 610,014.00 1.39 200,000.00 PED PENN CR BE CONS SYS SEE 2.118 4.017 AAA 100.053 203,994.00 1.07 3133IM44 4.8201 10/07/2002 DD 10/07/99 AAA 200,106.00 .46 1,000,000.00 PHILADELPHIA ELEC CO 1ST MUG 2.200 6.344 A2 102.453 1,027,680.00 5.49 717537DC5 6.500% 05/01/2003 DD 05/01/93 A 1,024,530.00 2.34 400,000.00 BOATNBUS RANCBHARES INC SUB 2.260 6.605 RAI 102.189 411,460.00 2.19 096650AE6 6.750% 03/15/2003 DO 03/15/93 A 408,756.00 .93 610,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BR CONS RUN 2.270 5.074 AAA 101.000 622,102.40 3.30 3333MCUE3 5.125% 01/13/2003 DO 01/12/01 AAA 616,100.00 1.41 195,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS ADS 2.270 5.597 AAA 101.125 199,594.20 1.05 3133M2A56 5.660% D1/13/2003 DD O1/13/98 AAA 197,193.75 .45 e ai YLDMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 MBF07511102 2002/09/30 RUN DATE 110/04/02 DISTRICTI LIQUID OPEMTING RUN TIME , 10.21.59 ......................................................................................................................... ' PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARMBT 'TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BODE YIBLD B-P PRICE MARMET VALUE E TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOW LN SR CONS BUD 2.296 5.541 AAA 101.250 102,392.00 .54 3133N23D7 5.6101 01/23/2003 DD 01/23/98 AAA 101,250.00 .23 500,000.00 HEURILL LYNCH 6 CO BONDS 2.352 5.920 AA3 101.359 508,160.00 2.72 590188HE4 6.0001 02/12/2003 DO 02/12/99 M- 506,795.00 1.16 324,000.00 SANMAM6RICA CORD SUB NY 2.372 6.669 AA3 103.D91 336,312.00 1.79 06605OB27 6.075% 06/01/2003 DD 06/01/93 A 334,014.64 .76 1,000,000.00 BOUSEBOLD PIN CORD SR HTS 2.500 7.554 A2 100.939 1,02B,630.00 5.41 441612RU4 7.625% 01/15/200) DO 01/14/93 A 11009,390.00 2.30 6,000,000.00 U B TREASURY NOTES 2.522 6.143 AAA 101.750 6,219,531.25 32.76 912827J78 06.250% 02/15/2003 DD 02/15/93 AM 6,105,000.00 13.93 505,000.00 BANC ONE MILN NA SUB HTS 2.532 6.472 A43 102.371 519,058.30 2.77 064216M2 6.625% 04/15/2003 DD 04/15/93 A 516,973.S5 1.16 250,000.00 DONALDSON LUPEIH ITR 00039E 2.614 6.995 AA 101.078 257,995.00 1.35 25766COOG 7.070% 12/19/2002 DD 12/13/99 M- 252,695.00 .SB 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 2.628 6.599 A2 102.296 620,292.00 3.29 073902ARI 6.750% 04/15/2003 A 613,716.00 1.40 193,000.00 PITHY DUNES CR CORP HT 2.723 6.589 M3 102.451 203,794.49 1.06 724477MO 0.000% 02/15/2003 DO 02/12/91 M 197,730.43 AS 15,000.00 FEDERAL DONE LN US CONS BD 2.751 5.799 MA 103.469 15,470.85 .00 3133M4VC4 6.000% 07/14/2003 DD 07/14/99 AM 15,520.35 .04 1,000,000.00 PUBLIC SVC CO OF CO 3.046 6.016 RMI 99.742 1,022,640.00 5.35 74444OB39 6.000% 04/15/2003 DO 04/20/98 BBB. 997,420.00 2.28 150,000.00 MRRILL LYNCH 3.107 6.756 M3 101.760 155,247.00 .01 590188RF9 6.8751 03/01/2003 M- 152,640.00 .35 200,000.00 DEAN HITTER DISCOVER 6 CO 3.144 6.755 M3 101.771 206,066.00 1.09 24240VACS 6.8751 D3/O1/2UO3 AA- 203,542.00 .46 YLDAML YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSP07511202 2002/05/30 AM DATE 10/04/02 DISTRICTI LIQUID OPERATING - RUN TIM 10.21.5E PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION ROOK YIRLU S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE E TOTAL ----------------- ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 400,000.00 MTUIW. RURAL, UITLS CODP PIN 3.240 7.26E Al 101.566 413,064.00 2.10 63743ICKO 7.375% 02/10/2003 OD 02/10/00 AI 406,264.00 .93 TOTAL PIME, Imm SYCURITIM LESS S.54S 18,869,148.85 100.00 18,631,710.22 42.53 2OTAL t.493 3.243 44,054,888.54 100.00 43,817,449.91 100.00 di • YLUANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 5 MST07522202 2002/09/30 RUN DATE t 10/04/02 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RON TINE 10.21.58 ................e........................................................................................................... PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MEANT TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-D PRICE MARRST VALUE \ TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 2,900,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MID ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.599 2,888,359.72 94.74 313589679 MAT 12/11/2002 A-1. 2,008,359.72 .03 160,201.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE MONT .ODD 1.574 AAA 100.000 160,281.40 5.25 996085247 AAA 160,201.40, .OS -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS .000 .042 3,046,641.12 100.00 3,040,641.12 .88 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR YANA BF MTO .000 5.343 ARE 102.938 3,063,750.00 .89 01F0524•A7 5.500% 10/01/2017 AD 10/01/02 AAA 3,066,140.00 .69 15,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA SP AM .000 5.373 AAA 103.938 15,493,125.00 4.52 01P0604AO 6.000% 10/01/2017 AD 10/01/02 ARE 15,590,625.00 4.49 5,000,000.DO COMMIT TO PUR mm SF MTG .000 5.838 AAA 102.791 5,100,000.00 1.49 01F0606AB 6.000% 10/01/2032 DD 10/01/02 AAA 5,139,062.50 1.48 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR OEM BY MTO .000 6.233 AAA 104.219 10,320,125.00 3.02 0100626A5 6.500% 30/15/2032 AD 10/01/02 AAA 10,421,900.00 3.00 900,000.00 BEAR STEANI2S MTN 4 TR 00459 .000 2.045 A2 100.140 899,406.00 .29 01392BVC4 PLTO AT 12/01/2003 DD 08/17/01 A 901,260.00 .26 4,S00,000.00 DAIMLER CMRYSLER SA CORP HT .000 2.593 A3 100.109 4,491,345.00 1.30 233B35AM9 FL1'G AT 12/16/2002 AD 12/15/00 SR 4,504,905.00 1.30 493,547.72 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 .000 5.712 102.243 503,881.39 .14 2547SMAD6 5.840% 10/17/2011 DD 03/19/99 504,618.00 .15 324,135.29 PRIME GROUP 9G4-0353 .000 7.341 AAA 102.161 332,339.95 .09 3128UBMA2 3.5001 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 ARE 331,139.04 .10 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LM BE CONS BDB .000 6.403 ARE 111.281 7,997,625.00 2.42 3133MAON7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 0,346,075.00 2.40 122,963.35 FHLMC GROUP 978-6064 .000 6.135 AAA 103.297 119,966.13 .03 31348SME3 6.304% 01/01/2028 AD 12/01/97 AAA 127,027.45 .04 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 6 OCSP07522202 2002/09/30 RON DATE t 10/04/02 DISTRICTt TANG-TERN OPERATING ROE TINE t 10.21.59 PAN VALUE YIN AT CURRENT NODDY SANEST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION SOON YIELD S-P PRICE HARRET VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MID ASSN SEES .000 4.041 AM 100.438 11,521,271.50 3.50 31359WX2 5.2508 06/15/2006 DO 06/22/01 AM 12,307,713.00 3.54 3,301,926.16 WHA POOL. #0559358 .000 6.219 AM 104.512 3,461,190.05 1.02 362000OR3 6.500% 04/15/2032 DO 04/01/02 AM 3,534,527.09 1.02 299,990.06 GHM II POOL #0003109 .000 7.105 AM 105.554 210,728.9P .06 36202DH23 3.S00B 07/20/2031 DO 02/01/01 AAA 211,086.16 .06 999,900.20 GNNA II POOL 00003152 .000 3.105 AAA 105.554 1,053,644.94 .30 36202DOD6 7.500% 10/20/2031 DO 10/01/02 AM 1,055,430.69 .30 526,286.11 GNM II POOL 00060395 .000 4.393 AM 102.434 521,516.65 .15 36225CNN4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 AM 539,095.91 .16 4,600,5IO.85 MHA II POOL 4080408A .000 4.395 AAA 102.389 4,553,786.91 1.36 36225CN28 6.5008 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 AM 4,710,417.05 1.36 3,000,000.00 GTE NORTH INC DEB HER A .000 5.792 M3 103.503 3,063,750.00 .90 362339AD9 6.0008 01/15/2004 DO 01/15/94 Al 3,105,090.00 .B9 4,000,000.00 GENERAL STAN ACCEP HTN 400615 .000 2.171 A2 98.671 3,998,440.00 1.14 33042NE80 PITH RT 09/D4/2003 DD 08/03/01 BBB+ 3,946,840.00 1.14 41000,000.00 NABISCO INC NTH .000 6.052 A2 101.213 4,001,440.00 1.13 629527CAS VAR AT 02/01/2033 DO 01/22/98 A 4,048,520.00 1.15 5,000,000.00 PBILIP HORRIH COS INC NTH .000 3.034 A2 106.622 5,263,000.00 1.54 719254CHO 3.S008 04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 A- 5,331,100.00 1.53 310,962.66 PREMIER AUTO IN 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.333 AAA 101.531 319,611.30 .09 34046RFH6 6.430% 03/08/2004 DO 06/21/99 315,723.50 .09 3,838,794.33 SEA DID DSV PARTS 2001-20C 1 .000 5.710 AAA 111.035 3,839,794.33 1.23 83162CWO 6.340% 03/01/2021 AM 4,262,405.28 1.23 2,902,566.19 SEA GTD PARTS CTPB BHIC-PS 01 .000 6.009 AM 110.510 2,902,566.19 .93 031641DD4 6.640% 02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 HE 3,207,625.90 .92 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PMSTHRU 01-1 C .000 12.362 B3 53.524 1,600,000.00 .24 909317BC2 6.831% 09/01/2008 DO 08/22/01 A- B56,384.DO .25 20,D00,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.405 AM 115.625 22,620,312.50 6.31 9/2827230 06.250% 02/15/2003 DO 02/15/97 AM 23,125,000.00 6.65 a •� •I YLDM" YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 7 OCBP07522202 2002/09/30 RON DATE 1 10/04/02 DISMICTI TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIRE 1 10.21.59 navvvvvevevvvvuanvnuvvvuvvvevuuvv==eeevveeusvuvueevvvvsenuwvvvvvennesewauve=eeenvenvun®sue.......................... PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY NARNET TOTAL COST/ 0 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE HARMT VALUE 0 TOTAL _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ________-- 6,259,341.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .000 3.446 AAA 112.43E 6,272,528.71 2.04 9128274YS 3.075E O1/15/2009 DO 01/15/99 AAA 7,037,877.03 2.03 74,500,000.OD U 6 TREASURY NOTES .DOD 6.012 AAA 112.281 80,979,062.50 24.28 9128276D9 06.750E 05/15/2065 DD 05/15/00 AAA 83,649,345.00 24.07 24,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.177 AAA 111.063 27,252,976.56 7.96 912B276N7 05.750E 11/15/2005 DO 11/15/00 AAA 27,432,561.00 7.09 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ZMC 6 SM O1 BER A .000 5.333 A3 107.819 31487,980.00 1.09 927004EN0 5.75D0 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01 A- 3,773,665.00 1.09 26,144,100.00 UR TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.817 3.090 AM 100.939 22,952,477.56 6.26 9128272H3 3.375E O1/15/2007 DD 01/25/97 AAA 28,480,059.66 8.19 1,400,000.00 BEARS ROEBUCX ACCEP CORP NTH 5.261 6.433 BM1 101.671 1,439,920.00 .42 8124000N6 6.5400 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,423,394.00 .41 3,950,000.00 CH&C SYS 5.752 1.805 A2 98.555 3,919,768.50 1.13 370425QVS VAR RT OB/18/2003 DO 08/17/90 BBB+ 3,892,922.50 1.12 2,000,000.00 BANRERB YR NY CORD GLOSAL HT 5.88E S.B45 Al 99.683 1,992,800.00 .57 06636SM4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05/11/90 A 1,997,660.00 .57 15,500,000.00 FBDRML MTL HIS "ON DOES 5.967 6.406 AM 111.219 16,154,410.00 5.00 31359MMI 7.125E 02/15/2005 DD 02/14/00 AM 17,238,945.00 4.96 3,000,000.00 BALTIHORE GAS 6 ZINC M 6.011 6.695 A2 100.82B 3,039,250.00 .87 059165=7 6.7501 12/15/2002 DD 12/20/00 BBB+ 3,024,940.00 .97 3,800,000.00 GENERAL KIM ACCEP IM OOS62 6.303 1.920 A2 99.4B4 3,793,958.00 1.09 37042NXKO VAR AT 02/14/20D3 DD 02/14/00 BBB+ 3,7BO.392.D0 1.09 1,655,892.50 PHIM NULTICLA88 RIG MR E3 A 6.316 4.678 MA 98.705 1,657,646.70 .47 3133ME95 VAR AT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/97 AAA 1,634,438.B2 .47 1,301,147.70 GNM GTD RENIC TR 2000-9 PN 6.320 2.313 AAA 100.437 1,301,147.70 .37 3B37H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/203D MA 1,306,833.72 .30 2,000,000.00 BEM STEAMS C0O INC 6.330 6.599 A2 102.206 2,031,960.00 .59 073902M1 6.750% 04/15/2003 A _ 2,043,720.00 .59 3,000,000.00 FORD HTR CR CO GIABAL LMDKARK 6.350 2.036 A3 90.734 3,O0D,O00.00 .05 345397SR5 VAR RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/00 BBe+ 2,962,020.00 .85 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 0 O SP07522202 2002/09/30 ROD DATE 1 10/04/02 DISTRICT] LONG-TERM OPERATING ROD TIME t 30.21.SB PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY IV SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,D00,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NIS 6.351 1.659 A3 98.075 1,992,500.00 .57 345393RV9 MID RT 02/13/2003 DD 02/13/98 BBB+ 1,971,S00.00 .50 20,066.31 GNMA POOL #0500917 6.389 5.774 AAA 103.923 19,047.32 .00 36210SPA0 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 20,851.50 .01 58,176.94 GNMA POOL #0506636 6.309 5.774 AAA 103.913 55,222.64 .01 36210YV90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 ARE 60,453.40 .02 692,695.38 DOMA POOL #0503388 6.389 5.774 AAA 103.913 657,519.44 .20 36210W55 6.0001 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99 AAA 719,B00.55 .21 22,689.01 GUM POOL 10499153 6.389 5.174 AAA 103.913 21,536.83 .00 36220QQES 6.0001 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/19 AAA 23,576.03 .01 5,903.20 GUM POOL 10496284 6.390 5.774 AAA 103.913 5,673.75 .00 36210HISI 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 ARE 6,211.17 .00 934,326.32 GNMA POOL /0416461 6.390 5.374 AAA 103.913 735,005.05 .23 36210NON4 6.000% 01/15/2021 DO O1/01/99 ARE 004,625.71 .23 206,150.83 GERA POOL 40491103 6.390 S.734 AAA 102.912 196,442.61 .06 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO O1/01/99 AAA 215,048.82 .06 10,619.54 GMMA POOL #0486720 6.390 5.712 AAA 103.149 17,674.02 .00 36210AVMG 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 ARE 19,354.83 .01 38,442.36 GMMA POOL #0497343 6.390 5.772 AAA 103.949 36,490.22 .01 36210HP45 6.0001 12/IS/2028 DD 12/01/9B ARE 39,960.45 .01 36,226.63 GERA POOL /0469600 6.391 5.332 ARE. 103.949 34,307.01 .01 36209EXRO 6.000% 11/15/2029 DD 11/01/99 AAA 37,657.22 .01 42,423.05 GNMA FOOL 10467239 6.311 5A72 ARE 103.949 39,319.54 .01 36209CCQ3 6.000% 10/15/2028 OD 10/01/98 ARE, 43,050.85 .01 72,519.34 GNMA POOL 10457814 6.391 5.772 AAA 103.949 60,836.71 .02 36208QSB3 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 75,383.13 .02 639,360.45 GNMA POOL /0467286 6.391 5.772 ARE 103.949 645,241.38 .20 36209CCR2 6.000% 10/15/2026 OD 10/01/90 AAA 706,604.19 .20 361,916.OB OVER POOL 10465555 6.392 5.732 AAA 103.949 723,225.70 .22 36209A648 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 09/01/98 AAA 792,004.87 .23 YLOAMAL YIELD ANALY8I8 PAGE 9 OCBFO7522202 2002/09/30 RUN DATE 1 10/04/02 DISTRICTi LONG-TERN OPERATING RON TIME t 10.21.50 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARNET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE MARMT VALUE B TOTAL _________________ ------- _______ _______ ________ ------------ -----_____ 32,128.05 OHM POOL 10483452 6.392 5.112 AAA 103.949 30,496.54 .00 36209MBV3 6.000% 09/15/2020 DD 09/01/99 AAA 33,396.79 .01 814,510.34 GNMA POOL #046.5546 6.392 5.172 AM 103.949 713,148.40 .24 36209AET3 6.000E 08/15/202B DO 08/01/9B AAA 846,675.35 .24 719,942.69 GNMA POOL 00468339 6.392 5.712 AM 103.949 740,336.244 .23 36209DHOO 6.000% 00/25/2026 DO 00/01/98 MA 010,742.63 .23 40,080.61 GRAM POOL #0438057 6.393 5.112 AAA 103.949 30,912.24 .01 36207PTN9 6.000E OS/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 AAA 42,503.30 .01 34,067.56 OEM POOL 00468330 6.393 5.132 MA 103.949 32,337.56 .01 36209DEP4 6.000% 05/15/2029 DO 05/01/98 AAA 35,412.99 .01 2,000,000.00 PBLNC NULTICLASS CTF III A6 6.406 6.33E AM 102.551 2,000,809.00 .59 3133TDPV2 6.500E 05/25/2010 AM 2,052,020.00 .59 2,799,530.69 FSLIC MULTICLAOB CTF HER 1620E 6.499 5.739 MA 104.547 2,643,396.15 .84 3133TI7A4 6.0001 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,926,833.71 .04 1,000,000.00 SALONON BB RIMS MTM 6.625 2.036 M1 100.079 1,000,000.DO .29 795489HEO VAR RT 04/26/2003 DO 04/28/00 M- 11000,780.00 .29 596,211.78 PNLMC GROUP /05-0436 6.628 6.961 AAA 100.556 605,546.71 .13 3126DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AM 599,526.72 .17 706,025.59 GNMA II POOL 1080090H 6.705 5.209 AM 103.179 722,287.39 .21 3622SCC20 3.3751 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 129,295.58 .21 2,000,000.00 NARKS 6 MCLEIIMAN COB INC SR M 6/217 6.223 A2 106.461 1,992,2BO.00 .61 51174BABB 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 2,129,220.00 .61 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.603 A3 100.249 2,995,000.00 .83 345397SJ3 6.7001 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 BBB+ 3,007,470.00 .87 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE NONE ME INC NT 6.966 6.465 A3 105.952 2,498,400.00 .76 22237UMB 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,648,800.00 ,76 467,055.90 GMMN II POOL 00080023 6.992 6.410 AM 103.356 474,791.53 .14 36225CA29 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 482,730.30 .14 2,100,000.00 FBDRRAL NAIL MG ASSN DEEP 7.113 5.665 AM 116.938 2,030,133.00 .31 31359MYS 6.625E 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,455,698.00 .31 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 10 OCSF07522202 20D2/D9/30 RUN DATE t 10/04/02 DISTRICTf RING-TERN OPRRATING RUN TINE 110.21.5E PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD B-P PRICE NAMST VALUE E TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO OUR 7.512 7.857 BAA3 104.359 2,151,250.00 .60 542671CT7 8.200E 03/15/2023 DO 03/26/93 A- 2,097,100.00 .60 802,597.87 GREYSTONB SVCNG COUP FBA 195-7 7.564 7.391 AAA 10D.530 790,962.55 .23 39010IAE4 7.430E 06/01/2001 DO 02/29/00 AAA 806,042.87 .23 1,000,000.00 FORD ROTOR CR CO NT 7.502 6.779 A3 99.569 965,170.00 .28 345397GV9 6.750E O5/15/2005 DO OS/24/93 BBB+ 995,690.00 .29 956,918.84 NNP/BUNTOON PAIGE 1000-11150 7.694 6.881 AAA 109.002 936,135.77 .30 302998GE3 7.500E 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 1,043,062.49 •30 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECO NTN 1TR 00115 7.709 6.765 A2 107.906 2,950,530.00 .93 69512BRUS 7.300E 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,237,180.00 .93 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE COUP SR NT 7.967 7.027 Al 112.066 1,594,032.00 .52 020002ALS 7.875E 05/01/2005 DO 05/02/00 A+ 1,793,056.00 .52 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL PIKED INCURS SECURITIES 1.049 5.29E 329,726,320.94 100.00 344,499,304.05 99.15 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL 1.04E 5.296 332,774,962.06 100.00 347,547,025.17 100.00 a 4 Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED ' SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMIN I I-Sep-2002 -35,000,000.00 NA9123459 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION 0.00 cw II-Sep-2002 0.00 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,061,993.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-2002 -1,061,993.76 996085247 03-Sep-2002 1,061,993.76 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,061,993.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-2002 -I,061,993.76 996095247 03-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 508,989.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-2002 -508,989.60 996085247 03-Sep-2002 508,989.60 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 508,989.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Sep-2002 -508,989.60 996085247 03-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Sep-2002 -47,100,000.00 99396B844 01.830^A 09/04/2002 DD 09/031 03-Sep-2002 47,100,000.00 B LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC.NY 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16:01 Esecullve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Sep-2002 47,100,000.00 99396BS44 01.830%09/04/2002 DO 09/03/ 03-Sep-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,283.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2002 -3,293.93 996085247 04-Sep-2002 3,293.93 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,293.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2002 -3,283.93 996085247 04-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 04-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,912,087.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2002 -34,912,087.39 996085247 04-Sep-2002 34,912,087.39 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,912,087.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2002 -34,912,087.39 996085247 04-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 04-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 04-Sep-2002 -12,199,413.72 313589E66 MAT 09/05/2002 04-Sep-2002 12,199,413.72 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 04-Sep-2002 -12,199,413.72 313589E66 MAT 09/05/2002 04-Sep-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 04-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oc62002 11:16.01 Executive H4wk&mh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE, e3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,786.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Sep-2002 -6,786.00 996085247 05-Sep-2002 6,786.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,786.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05Sep-2002 -6,786.00 9%085247 05-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 05-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,600,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Sep-2002 -4,600,000.00 996085247 05-Sep-2002 4,600,000.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,600,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Sep-2002 4,600,000.00 996095247 05-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 05-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 05-Sep-2002 -1,793,214.00 39142ULNO 1122/2002 05-Sep-2002 1,793,214.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO I 00,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP DISC 05-Sep-2002 -I,793,214.00 39142ULNO 11/222002 05-Sep-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 05-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,600,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 05-Sep-2002 -7,600,000.00 99396D519 01.730%09/06/2002 DD 09/031 05-Sep-2002 7,600,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 07-0ct-1002 11:16:01 &ec.11w Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,600,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 05-Sep-2002 -7,600,000.00 99396D519 01.730%09/06/2002 DD 09/051 05-Sep-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 05-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 06-Sep-2002 -12,500,000.00 99396F985 01.660%09/09/2002 DO 09/061 06-Sep-2002 12,500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 06-Sep-2002 -12,500,000.00 99396F985 01.660%09/09/2002 DD 09/061 06-Sep-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 06-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P)MCO 38,067.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Sep-2002 -38,067.20 996085247 09-Sep-2002 38,067.20 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 38,067.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Sep-2002 -39,067.20 9%085247 09-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 09-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Sep-2002 12,500,000.00 993%0801 01.730%09/10/2002 DD 09/09/ 09-Sep-2002 12,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Sep-2002 -12,500,000.00 99396GBOI 01.730%09/1012002 DD 09/091 09-Sep-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 09-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oc1-1001 11:16:01 Eucudw Workbench Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. •5 © PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 87,783.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Sep-2002 -97,783.75 996085247 10-Sep-2002 87,783.75 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 87,793.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Sep-2002 -87,783.75 996085247 10-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 10-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,000,600.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Sep-2002 -9,000,600.69 996085247 10-Sep-2002 9,000,600.69 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,000,600.69 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-Sep-2002 -9,000,600.69 996085247 10-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 10-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 10-Sep•2002 -3.500,000.00 99396/417 01.700%0 911 1/2 0 0 2 DD 09/101 10-Sep-2002 3,500,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 10-Sep-2002 .3,500,000.00 99396/417 01.700%09/11/2002 DO 09/10/ 10-Sep-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 10-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU I I-Sep-2002 -3,490,744.44 3135891,441 MAT 11/06/2002 11-Sep-2002 3,490,744.44 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-Od-2002 11:16.01 Execurlve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU II-Sep-2002 -3,490,744.44 313589N41 MAT 11/062002 11-Sep-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY II-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,585.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Sep-2002 -1,595.93 996085247 12-Sep-2002 1,585.83 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,585.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Sep-2002 -1,585.83 996095247 12-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 12-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 USAA CAP COPP DISC 12-Sep-2002 -1,498,414.17 90328BK42 10/042002 12-Sep-2002 1,498,414.17 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 USAA CAP CORP DISC 12-Sep-2002 -1,498,414.17 90328BK42 10/042002 12-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 12-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 13-Sep-2002 2,887,675.00 313397S85 MAT 12/12/2002 13-Sep-2002 2,897,675.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 13-Sep-2002 -2,887,675.00 313397S85 MAT 12/12/2002 13-Sep-2002 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 13-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oc(-1001 11:16.01 aeculi"Workbench . QMellon Trast-Sample Report PAGE.' 7 . PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 13,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Sep-2002 -13,500.00 996095247 16-Sep-2002 13,500.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 13,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Sep-2002 -13,500.00 996085247 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 16-Sep-2002 -8,799,547.78 313397G21 MAT 09/172002 16-Sep-2002 8,799,547.78 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS I6-Sep-2002 -8,799,547.78 313397G21 MAT 09/172002 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,922.75 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 17-Sep-2002 -15,922.75 996097094 17-Sep-2002 15,922.75 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 17-Sep-2002 -8,864,276.39 313589S79 MAT 12/112002 17-Sep-2002 8,864,276.39 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,900,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 17-Sep-2002 -8,864,276.39 313589S79 MAT 12/11/2002 17-Sep-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 17-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16:01 ErocutNc Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00G00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,922.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Sep-2002 -15,922.75 996095247 18-Sep-2002 15,922.75 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,922.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Sep-2002 -15,922.75 996085247 18-Sep-2002 0.00 FC I8-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,887.79 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Sep-2002 -15,887.78 996085247 18-Sep-2002 15,887.78 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 15,887.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT IS-Sep-2002 -15,987.78 996085247 18-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 18-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 18-Sep-2002 -2,193,247.22 31338SQ41 MAT 11/222002 18-Sep-2002 2,193,247.22 B BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC I8-Sep-2002 2,193,247.22 313385Q41 MAT 1122/2002 18-Sep-2002 0.00 FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE ZOETE 18-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-Sep-2002 -1,490,865.00 02581 SNN7 01222003 IS-Sep-2002 1,490,965.00 B AMERICAN EXPRESS TR CO,MINN 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16:01 Erecutm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-Sep-2002 -1,490,965.00 02581SNN7 01/222003 18-Sep-2002 0.00 FC AMERICAN EXPRESS TR CO,MINN 18-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 162,539.07 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Sep-2002 -162,539.07 996085247 19-Sep•2002 162,539.07 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 162,539.07 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Sep-2002 -162,539.07 996085247 19-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 19-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,913.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-2002 -6,813.33 996085247 20-Sep-2002 6,813.33 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6.813.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-2002 -6,813.33 996085247 20-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 20•Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 236,390.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-2002 -236,390.92 996085247 20-Sep-2002 236,390.92 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 236,390.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Sep-2002 -236,390.92 996085247 20-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 20-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16:01 Eeecudw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.' 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADEDATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINBASS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-Sep-2002 -1,993,186.67 313385R65 MAT 121MD02 20-Sep-2002 1,993,196.67 B MORGAN STANLEY A CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-Sep-2002 -1,993,186.67 313385R65 MAT 12/022002 204ep-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&.CO INC.NY 20-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,938.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Sep-2002 -13,938.61 996085247 25-Sep-2002 13,939.61 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,938.61 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25Sep-2002 -13,93&61 996085247 25-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 25-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,829,200.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Sep-2002 -6,829,200.00 996085247 25-Sep-2002 6,829,200.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,929,200.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Sep-2002 C829,200.00 996085247 25-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 25-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 25-Sep-2002 -5,773,495.00 313589U43 MAT 12/242002 25-SW2002 5,775,495.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 07.0u-2002 11:16:01 EKcum'e W&kbewh ' Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Re Fort PAGE.' // PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002 -30SEP-2002 OCSDXONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 25-Sep-2002 -5,775,495.00 313589U43 MAT 1224/2002 25-Sep-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS MC,NEW YORK 25-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 26-Sep-2002 -998,122.22 313397N31 MAT 11/052002 26-Sep-2002 998,122.22 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 26-Sep-2002 -998,122.22 313397N31 MAT 11/052002 26-Sep-2002 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 26-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 26-Sep-2002 -997,600.00 63743DLDI 11/132002 26-Sep-2002 997,600.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 26-Sep-20O2 -997,600.00 63743DLDI 11/132002 26-Sep-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 26-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 18,600.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Sep-2002 18,600.00 996095247 304ep-2002 18,600.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 18,600.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Sep-2002 -18,600.00 996085247 30-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 30-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oa-1001 11:16r01 &eculiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30SEP-2002 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,625.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Sep-2002 -100,625.00 996085247 30-Sep-2002 100,625.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,625.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Sep-2002 -100,625.00 996085247 30-Sep-2002 0.00 FC - 30-Sep-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 30-Jul-2002 9,993,750.00 0IF060691 6.000%09/01/2032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 .9,993,750.00 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 30-Jul-2002 4,996,875.00 0IF060691 6.000%09/012032 DO 09101/ 16-Sep-2002 -4,996,975.00 BC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 30-Jul-2002 4,996,875.00 0IF060691 6.000%091012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sgp 2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,544.00 FNMA POOL#0661587 30-Jul-2002 -333,335.54 31391A6Y0 6.0005A 10/012032 DO 09/01/ I&Sep-2002 333,335.54 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,544.00 FNMA POOL80661587 30-Jul-2002 -833.86 31391A6Y0 6.000%10/012032DD09/01/ 16Sep-2002 0.00 18 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16:01 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-SRm le Report PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ 77ANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,544.00 FNMA POOLN0661587 30-Jul-2002 -334,169.40 31391A6YO 6.000%10/012032 DO 09/011 16-Sep-2002 O.OD PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16Sep-2002 O.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333aM.00 FNMA POOLN0662093 30-Jul-2002 -333,045.72 31391BRN9 6.000%09/012032 DO 091011 16-Sep-2002 333,043.72 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,254.00 FNMA POOL M0662093 30-Jul-2DO2 -833.14 31391BRN9 6.000°A 09/012032 DD 09101/ I&Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,254.00 FNMA POOL#0662093 30Jul-20D2 -333,878.86 31391BRN9 6.0001%09/012032 DO 09/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,373.00 FNMA POOL00661967 30-3u1-2002 333,164.64 31391BMQ7 6.000%09/012032 DO 091011 16Sep-2002 333,164.64 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,373.00 FNMA POOL N0661%7 30Jul-2002 -833A3 31391BMQ7 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,373.00 FNMA POOLN0661967 30-Jul-2002 -333,998.07 31391BMQ7 6.00D%09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct-1001 11:16::01 Eve the W.bnmh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report _ _ _ PAGE 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY HJ TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 332,I52.00 FNMA POOL80662956 30-Jul-2002 -331,944.41 31391CQH1 6.000%09/01/2032 DO 09/011 16-Sep-2002 331,944.41 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 332,152.DD FNMA POOLN0662956 30-Jul-2002 -830.39 31391CQHI 6.000%09/01/2032 DD D9/01/ 16-Sep-2002 O.OD IS 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 332,I52.00 FNMA POOLM0662956 30-Jul-2002 -332,774.79 31391CQH1 6.000%09/01/2032 DD 09/0U 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMA14 SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,312.00 FNMA POOL#0662095 30-Jul-2002 -333,103.68 31391BRQ2 6.ODO%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 333,103.68 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,312.00 FNMA POOL#0662095 30-Jul-2002 433.28 31391BRQ2 6.000%09/012032 DO OW01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 333,312.00 FNMA POOL#0662095 30-Jul-2002 333,936.96 31391BRQ2 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0AO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,509.00 FNMA POOL80663337 30-Jul-2002 ,333,300.56 3139IC4W2 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 333,300.56 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 07.0G-2002 11:16:01 Eiecutive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE IS PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,509.00 FNMA POOL80663337 30-Jul-2002 -833.77 31391C4W2 6.000%0910112032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,509.00 FNMA POOL80663337 30-Jul-2002 -334,134.33 31391C4W2 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,223.22 FNMA POOL 80622359 30-Jul-2002 -333,014.96 31389DMG9 6.000%01/01/2032DD01/01/ 16-Sep-2002 333,014.96 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,223.22 FNMA POOLp0622359 30-1ul-2002 -933.06 31389DMG9 6.000%0 1/0 12 0 3 2DD01/0l/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,223.22 FNMA PGOLW0622359 30-1ul-2002 -333,848.02 31389DMG9 6.0000/.01/012032DD01/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 335,115.00 FNMA POOL#0649879 30-Jul-2002 334,905.55 313901,6Q4 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 334,905.55 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 335,115.00 FNMA POOL90649979 30-Jul-2002 -837.79 31390L6Q4 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 07-0ct-1001 11:16.01 Eeecurlve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 335,115.00 FNMA POOL#0649879 30-Jul-2002 -335,743.34 31390L6Q4 6.0001%09/01/2032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 332,525.00 FNMA POOL 00660367 30-Jul-2002 -332,317.17 31390YZ84 6.000°h09/0I2032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 332.317.17 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 332,525.00 FNMA POOL 00660567 30-Jul-2002 -831.31 31390YZ84 6.000%0 9101 2 0 3 2 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 332,525.00 FNMA POOLA0660567 30-Jul-2002 -333,148.48 31390YZ84 6.000%0 910 12 0 3 2 DO 09/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0,00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,596.85 FNMA POOL80604545 30-1ul-2002 -333,388.35 31388GTA9 6.000%12/012031 DO I I/01/ 16-Sep-2002 333,388.35 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,596.95 FNMA POOL80604545 30-Jul-2002 - 833.99 31388GTA9 6.0001/.12/012031 DO 11/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,596.85 FNMA POOL80604545 30-1ul-2002 -334,222.34 31388GTA9 6.000%12/012031 DD I I/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oc1-2002 11:16.01 Executive Workbench - Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE' 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333.423.40 FNMA POOL#0640078 30-Jul-2002 -333,215AI 31390ACP3 6.000%04/012032 DO 04/01/ 16-Sep2002 333,215.01 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,423.40 FNMA POOL#0640078 30-Jul-2002 -833.56 31390ACP3 6.000%0 4/01203 2 DO 04/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,423.40 FNMA POOL#0640078 30-1u1-2002 -334.049.57 31390ACP3 6.0000/.04/012032 DO 04/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,779.00 FNMA POOL#0652832 30-1ul-2002 -333,570.39 31390QHH1 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 333,570.39 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,779.00 FNMA POOL#0652832 30-1ul-2002 -834.45 31390QHH1 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep•2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 333,779.00 FNMA POOL#0652832 30-1u1-2002 334,404.94 31390QHHI 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,045.00 FNMA POOL#0660566 30-Jul-2002 -332,936.85 31390YZ76 6.000^/e09/012032DD09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 332,836.85 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 07-Oct-1001 11:1&'01 &ecutin Wwkbeneh (a Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,045.00 FNMA POOLN0660566 30-Jul-2002 -832.61 31390YZ76 6.000%09/012032 DD 091011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,045.00 FNMA POOL 40660566 30-Jul-2002 -333,669.46 31390YZ76 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/0V 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 332,634.00 FNMA POOLN0663334 30-Jul-2002 -332,426.10 31391C4T9 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/011 16-Sep-2002 332,426.10 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33Z634.00 FNMA P001,00663334 304u1-2002 431.59 3139IC419 6.000%0 9/0 12 03 2 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 332,634.00 FNMA POOL00663334 30-Jul-2002 -333,257.69 31391C4T9 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,019.00 FNMA POOL#0657243 30-Jul-2002 -332,810.96 31390VEQ3 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/0V 16-Sep-2002 33Z810.86 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,019.00 FNMA POOL#0657243 30-Jul-2002 -832.55 31390VEQ3 6.000%09/012032 DD 091011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 1B 0.00 07-0c61001 11:16.01 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE.- /p PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED i SHARESIPAR TRADE DATEI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIONI SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 333,019.00 FNMA POOLs0657243 30-Jul-2002 -333,643.41 3139OVEQ3 6.000%09/012032 DO 091011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 16Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 3,090,625.00 0IF060493 6.000%09/012017 DD 09/011 19-Sep-2002 -3,080,625.00 BC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 6,161,250.00 0IF060493 6.000%09/012017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 -6,161,250.00 BC BE OF AMER NAIL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 -CI59,375.00 OIFO60493 6.000%09/01/2017 DO 091011 19-Sep-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,00000 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTO 01-Aug-2002 -C161X0.00 0IF060493 6.000%09/012017 DO 09/011 19-Sep-2002 C161,250.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS Cr 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 .6,161,250.00 0IF060493 6.000%09/012017 DD 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NAIL TR&SVGS Cr 19-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMITTO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 -3,090,625.00 0IF060493 0.000%09/012017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 3,080,625.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-0c1-2002 IP16:01 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 -3,080,625.00 0IF060493 6.0000/.0 9/012 0 1 7 DO 091011 19-Sep-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Aug-2002 3,045,000.00 01FOS2490 5.500%09/012017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 -3,045,000.00 BC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Aug-2002 -3,043,000.00 0IF052490 5.500%09/012017 DD 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 19-Aug-2002 1,264,500.00 21HO72692 7.500%09202032 DO 09/01/ 23-Sep-2002 -1,264,500.00 BC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 19-Aug-2002 -7,216,562.50 OIN062698 6.500e/h09/152032 DD 09/01/ 23-Sep-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 23-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 19-Aug-2002 9,247,500.00 OIN062699 6.500%09/15/2032 DD 09101/ 23-Sep-2002 0.00 PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 23-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 999,900.20 GNMA 11 POOL 90003152 19-Aug-2002 -1,053,644.84 36202DQD6 7.500%10202031 DO 10/01/ 23-Sep-2002 1,053,644.84 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16.01 Ezecutm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report Pace 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 999,900.20 GNMA II POOL#0003152 19-Aug-2002 4,582.88 36202DQD6 7.500%10202031 DD 10/01/ 23-Sep-2002 0.00 lB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 999,900.20 GNMA II POOL#0003152 19-Aug-2002 -1,058,227.72 36202DQD6 7.500%1020/2031 DD 10/01/ 23-Sep-2002 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 23-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 199,980.06 GNMA II POOL#0003109 19-Aug-2002 210,728.99 36202DN23 7.500%07/202031 DD07/01/ 23-Sep-2002 210.729.99 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 199,980.06 GNMA II POOL#0003109 19-Aug-2002 -916.58 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DO 07/01/ 23-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 199,980.06 GNMA II POOL 00003109 19-Aug-2002 -211,645.57 36202DN23 7.500%07202031 DD 07/01/ 23-Sep-2002 0.00 PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 23-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-Aug-2002 -22,684,850.55 9128272JO 06.250%02/152007 DD 021151 03-Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 PHILADELPHIA ELEC CO IST MTG 03-Sep-2002 -1,027,680.00 717537DC5 6.500%05/012003 DO 0510119 06-Sep-2002 1,027,680.00 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16:01 Enmtm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 PHILADELPHIA ELEC CO IST MTG 03-Scp-2002 -22,569.44 717537DC5 6.500%05101/2003 DD 05/01M 06-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 PHILADELPHIA ELEC CO IST MTO 03Sep-2002 -1,050,249.44 717537DC5 6.500%05/012003 DO 05/0119 06-Sep-2002 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 06Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 04Sep-2002 -5,100,000.00 0IF0606A8 6.000%10/012032 DO 10/01/ 15-Oct-2002 5,100,000.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS k CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 04-Sep-2002 -3,063,750.00 01F0524A7 5.500%10/012017 DO 10/01/ 21-Oct-2002 3,063,750.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 340,000.00 BANC ONE MILW NA SUB NTS 10-Sep-2002 -348,986.20 064216AA2 6.625%04/152003 DD 04/1SM 13-Sep-2002 348,986.20 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 340,000.00 BANC ONE MILW NA SUB NTS 10-Sep-2002 9,260.28 064216AA2 6.625%041152003 DD 04115N 13-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 340,000.00 BANC ONE MILW NA SUB NTS 10-Sep-2002 -358,246.48 064216AA2 6.625%04/152003 DO 04/1519 13-Sep-2002 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 13-Scp-2002 0.00 07-0c1-2002 11:16.01 Fx wire Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/a000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Sep-2002 -3,105,000.00 0IF0604AO 6.000%10/012017 DD 10MI/ 21-Oct-2002 3,105,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Sep-2002 -6,210,000.00 0IF0604AO 6.000%10/012017 DO 10/01/ 21.Oct-2002 6,210,000.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 466,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 20-Sep-2002 471,764.42 31359MHA4 5.000%02/142003 DO 02/23/0 23-Scp-2002 471,764.42 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 466,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 20-Sep-2002 -2,459.44 31359MHA4 5.000%021142003 DD 0223/0 23-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 466,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 20-Sep-2002 474,223.86 31359MHA4 5.000%02/142003 DD 022310 23-Sep-2002 0.00 PC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 23-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-Sep-2002 -27,252,976.56 9128276N7 05.750%11/152005 DO 11/151 27-Sep-2002 27,252,976.56 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-Sep-2002 -521,015.63 9128276N7 05.750"/011/152005 DO 111151 27-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16:01 Eve tfte Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE CAW/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-Sep-2002 -27,773,992.19 9128276N7 05.750%1 111 5/2 0 0 5 DD 11/15/ 27-Sep-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 27-Sep-2002 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,520.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2002 28,520.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 011151 15-Jul-2002 28,520.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,520.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 154u1-2002 -28,520.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 011151 15-Jul-2002 0.00 FC 30-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,840.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2002 -6,840.00 9128274Y5 3.875%0 111 52 0 0 9 DD 011151 15-Jul-2002 6,840.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,840.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2002 .6,840.00 9128274Y5 3,875%01/152009 DD 011151 15-Jul-2002 0.00 FC 30-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,927.98 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Sep-2002 -13,927.98 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/01/9 01-Sep-2002 13,927.98 PU on 07-Oct-1002 11:16.01 Executive Workbench Q MelloD Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocSG000l 0000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,927.98 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Sep-2002 -13,927.98 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DO 11/0" 01-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 17-Sep-2002 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,677.83 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Sep-2002 6,677.83 996087094 03-Sep-2002 -6,677.93 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Sep-2002 19,800,000.00 99396A622 01.920%09/032002 DO 0800/ 03-Sep-2002 -19,800,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Sep-2002 4,004.00 99396A622 01.820%09/03/2002 DO 08/30/ 03-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 03-Sep-2002 19,804,004.00 99396A622 01.820%09/032002 DD 08/30/ 03-Sep-2002 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Sep-2002 47,100,000.00 99396BB44 01,830%09/04/2002 DO 09/03/ 04-Sep-2002 47,100,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-0kca1001 11:16.01 Etteutive Wo kbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re rt PAGE: 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Sep-2002 2,394.25 99396B844 01.830E 09/042002 DO 09/03/ 04-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 04-Sep-2002 47,102,394.25 99396B844 01.830%09/0420D2 DO 09/03/ 04-Sep-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 04-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -290,512.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Sep-2002 290,512.98 996095247 06-Sep-2002 -290,512.98 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -290,512.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Sep-2002 290,512.98 996085247 06-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 06-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,899,634.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Sep-2002 4,899,634.78 996085247 06Sep-2002 4,899,634.78 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,999,634.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Sep-2002 4,899,634.78 996085247 06-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 06-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P)MCO -7,600,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 06-Sep-2002 7,600,000.00 993%D519 01,730%09/062002 DO 09/05/ 06-Sep-2002 -7,600,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 07-Oct-1002 11:16.01 FsecmPoe Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE' 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG6o TOM 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CCAWLIDATED SHARE.SIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,600,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 06-Sep-2002 365.22 99396D519 01.730°A 09/062002 DO 09/O5/ 06Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,600,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 06-Sep-2002 7,600,365.22 99396D519 01.730%09/06P2002 DD 091051 06-Sep-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 06-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,500.000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 09-Sep-2002 12,500,000.00 993961`985 01.660%09/092002 DO 09/061 09-Sep-2002 -12,500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PRACO -12,500.000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 09-Sep-2002 1,729.17 99396F985 01.6601%09/092002 DO 091W 09-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 09-Sep-2002 12,501,729.17 99396F985 01.660%09/092002 DO 09/061 09-Sep-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 09-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 10-Sep-2002 12,500,000.00 993960801 01.730%09/102002 DD 091W 10-Sep.2002 -12,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -I2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 10-Sep-2002 600.69 99396GS01 01.730%09/102002 DD 09/091 10Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Od-2001 11:16:01 Execuliw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY W TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 10-Sep-2002 12,500,600.69 99396GS01 01.730%09/10/2002 DO 09/091 10-Sep-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 10-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,990,579.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I I-Sep-2002 34,990,579.16 996085247 11-Sep-2002 -34,990,579.16 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,990,579.16 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I I-Sep-2002 34,990,579.16 996085247 11-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 11-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO II-Sep-2002 3,500,000.00 99396/417 01.7001%09/11/2002 DO 09/101 11-Sep-2002 -3,500,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO I1-Sep-2002 165.28 99396J417 01.700%09/11/2002 DO 09/101 11-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO II-Sep-2002 3,500,165.28 99396/417 01.700%09/11/2002 DID 09/10/ 11-Sep-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C I I-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -345,921.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 13-Sep-2002 345,921.48 996085247 13-Sep-2002 -345,921.48 S 0.00 07-Oct-1001 11:16.01 Erecut(w Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -345,921.48 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Sep-2002 345,921.48 996085247 13-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 13-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,873,416.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Sep-2002 7,873,416.85 996095247 16-Sep-2002 -7.873.416.85 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,973,416.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Sep-2002 7,873,416.85 996085247 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC I6-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,054.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-2002 34,054.38 996085247 17-Sep-2002 -34,054.39 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,054.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Sep-2002 34,054.38 996085247 17-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 17-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15.922.75 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT IB-Sep-2002 - 15,922.75 996097094 1S-Sep-2002 -15,922.75 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 474,223.86 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Sep-2002 474,223.86 996085247 23-Sep-2002 474,223.86 S 0.00 07-0c1-2002 11:16:01 &ecwm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 474,223.86 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Sep-2002 474,223.86 996085247 23-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 23-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,197,802.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Sep-2002 1,197,802.98 996095247 23-Sep-2002 -1,197,802.98 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,197,802.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Sep-2002 1,197,802.98 996085247 23-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 23-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,796,217.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Sep-2002 5,796,217.22 996085247 26-Sep-2002 -5,796,217.22 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -5,796,217.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Sep-2002 5,7%,217.22 996085247 26-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 26-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -617,734.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Sep-2002 617,734.13 996085247 27-Sep-2002 -617,734.13 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -617,734.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Sep-2002 617,734.13 996085247 27-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 27-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct-1002 11:16:01 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 3/ PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGO0010WO 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROIm COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,70D,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 27-Sep-2002 17,623,044.33 313385K70 MAT 10/162002 27-Sep-2002 -17,623,044.33 S GHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,70D,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 27-Sep-2002 61,074.94 313385K70 MAT 10/162002 27-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC 27-Sep-2002 17,684,119.17 31338SK70 MAT 10/162002 274ep-2002 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 27Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,5W,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 27Sep-2002 3,490,744.44 313589N41 MAT 11/062002 27-Sep-2002 -3,490,744.44 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -3,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 27-Sep-2002 2,644.45 313589N41 MAT 11/06t2D02 27Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 27-Sep-2002 3,493,388.89 313SM41 MAT 11/062002 27-Sep-2002 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 27-Sep.2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO b,OW,OW.W FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISCOU 27-Sep-2002 5,975,916.67 313589S79 MAT 12/112002 27-Sep-2002 -5,975,916.67 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 07-0eh2002 11:16.•01 E�lw Wm*bemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00G00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIMLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 27-Sep-2002 2,933.33 313589S79 MAT IVI 1/2002 27-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 27-Sep-2002 5,978,750.00 313589S79 MAT 12/112002 27-Sep-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 30-Sep-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 14-Aug-2002 -5,101,562.50 OI F060691 6.000%09/01/2032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 4,996,875.00 SC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY -I04,687.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -335,115.00 FNMA POOL#0649879 14-Aug-2002 341,922.02 3139OL6Q4 6.000%09/0 12 03 2 DD 091011 16Sep.2002 -334,905.55 S BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 7.016.47 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,335,115.00 FNMA POOL 00649879 14-Aug-2002 837.79 31390L6Q4 6,000%09/012032 DO 09101/ 16Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -335,115.00 FNMA POOL#0649879 14-Aug-2002 342,759.81 3139OL6Q4 6.0D0%0 910 12 03 2 DD 09/01/ 16Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 O.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,779.00 FNMA POOL#0652832 14-Aug-2002 340„558.89 31390QHHI 6.00D%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 -333,570.39 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,988.50 07.Oct2002 11:16:01 Execufh Wwkbexh - Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,779.00 FNMA POOL 80652832 14-Aug-2002 934.45 31390QHHI 6.000%09/01/2032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,779.00 FNMA POOL 00652832 14-Aug-2002 34093.34 31390QHHI 6.000%09/01/2032 DO 09/0It 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,045.00 FNMA POOL80660566 14-Aug-2002 339,809.99 31390YZ76 6.0000A09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 -332,936.95 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,973.13 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,045.00 FNMA POOL 00660566 14-Aug-2002 932.61 31390YZ76 6.ODO%09/01/2032 DO 09/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,045.00 FNMA POOL90660566 14-Aug-2002 340,642.59 31390YZ76 6.000%09/01/2032 DD 09/01/ 16Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,544.00 FNMA POOL 80661587 14-Aug-2002 340,319.11 31391A6YO 6.000%101012032DD09tOl/ 16-Sep-2002 -333,335.54 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,993.57 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,544.00 FNMA POOL80661587 14-Aug-2002 933.86 31391A6YO 6.000%10/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Oc62001 11:/6:0/ &mutt"worbowk Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG00010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,544.00 FNMA POOL#0661587 14-Aug-2002 341,152.97 31391A6YO 6.00DY 10/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -332,525.00 FNMA POOL#0660567 14-Aug-2002 339,279.41 31390YZ84 6.000%09/01/2032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 -332,317.17 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,962.24 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -332,525.00 FNMA POOL#0660567 14-Aug-2002 831.31 31390YZ84 6.0001Y.09/012032DD09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -332,525.00 FNMA POOL#0660567 14-Aug-2002 340,110.72 31390YZ84 6.000%0 9/0120 3 2 DD 09/011 I&Sep-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,373.00 FNMA POOL#0661967 14-Aug-2002 340,144.64 31391BMQ7 6,000%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 -333,164.64 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,980.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,373.00 FNMA POOL#0661967 14-Aug-2002 833.43 3139IBMQ7 6.000%09/01/2032DD09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,373.00 FNMA POOL#0661967 14-Aug-2002 340,978.07 31391BMQ7 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 - FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11 16.01 Erecudw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,254.00 FNMA POOL#0662093 14-Aug-2002 340,023.22 31391BRN9 6.000%09/012032 DO 091011 16-Sep-2002 -333,045.72 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC.NY 6,977.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,254.00 FNMA POOL#0662093 14-Aug-2002 833.14 31391BRN9 6.000%09/01/2032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,254.00 FNMA POOL#0662093 14-Aug-2002 340,8M.36 31391BRN9 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO MG NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,312.00 FNMA POOL#0662095 14-Aug-2002 34082.40 31391BRQ2 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/011 16-Sep-2002 -333,103.68 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,979.72 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,312.00 FNMA POOL 00662095 14-Aug-2002 833.29 31391BRQ2 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 1s 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,312.00 FNMA POOL#0662095 14-Aug-2002 - 340,915.68 31391BRQ2 6.000%09/012032 DD 091011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 164Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,509.00 FNMA POOL 00663337 14-Aug-2002 340.293.40 31391C4W2 6.000%(19/01/2032 DD 09/011 16-Sep-2002 -333,300.56 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,982.94 07-Oct-2002 /1:16:OI Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,509.00 FNMA POOL#0663337 14-Aug-2002 833.77 31391C4W2 6.000%09/012032DD09N1/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,509.00 FNMA POOL#0663337 14-Aug-2002 341,117.17 31391C4W2 6.000%09/012032DD09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -332,152.00 FNMA POOL#0662956 14-Aug-2002 338,898.84 31391CQHI 6.000%0 91012 0 3 2 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 -331,944.41 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,954.43 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -332,152.00 FNMA POOL#0662956 14-Aug-2002 830.39 31391CQHI 6.000%0 9/0 12 03 2 DO 091011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -332,152.00 FNMA POOL#0662956 14-Aug-2002 339,729.22 31391CQHI 6.000%09/012032 DO 091011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,019.00 FNMA POOL#0657243 14-Aug-2002 339,783.45 31390VEQ3 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 -332,810.86 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,972.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,019.00 FNMA POOL#0657243 14-Aug-2002 832.55 31390VEQ3 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 07-Oc62002 11:16.01 &ccuflw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PGE 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY H5 TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATP/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE CARVLOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,019.00 FNMA POOL90657243 14-Aug-2002 340,616.00 31390VBQ3 6.000%09Po12032DD09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -332,634.00 FNMA POOLOO663334 14-Aug-2002 339,390.63 3139IC479 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16Sep-2002 -332,426.10 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,964.33 LONGTERM OPER-P1MCO 332,634.00 FNMA POOL#0663334 14-Aug-2002 831.59 3139IC479 6.000%09/012032 DO 091011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -332,634.00 FNMA POOL#0663334 14-Aug-2002 340,222.22 31391C4T9 6.000%09/012032DD09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY I6-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,596.85 FNMA POOL#0604545 14-Aug-2002 340,373.04 313880TA9 6.000%12/012031 DO 11/01/ 16-Sep-2002 -333,38935 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,994.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,596.85 FNMA POOL#0604545 14-Aug-2002 833.99 31388GTA9 6.000%12/012031 DO I MY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,596.95 FNMA POOL#0604545 14-Aug-2002 341,207.03 31388GTA9 6.00D%12/012031 DO I YOU 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY I6Sep-2002 0.00 07-Ocl-2002 11.:16:01 Ececurim Workbench QMellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE.' 38 . PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SNARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,223.22 FNMA POOL#0622359 14-Aug-2002 339,991.82 31389DMG9 6.000%01/012032DD01/0l/ 16-Sep-2002 -333,014.96 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,976.86 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,223.22 FNMA POOL#0622359 14-Aug-2002 833.06 31389DMG9 6.000%01/01/2032 DD 01/01/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,223.22 FNMA POOL#0622359 14-Aug-2002 340,824.98 31389DMG9 6.000%01/01/2032DD01/0l/ 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,423.40 FNMA POOL#0640078 14-Aug-2002 340,1%.06 31390ACP3 6.000%04/012032 DO 041011 16-Sep-2002 -333,215.01 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 6,981.05 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,423.40 FNMA POOL#0640078 14-Aug-2002 833.56 31390ACP3 6.000^/h 04/012032 DD 041011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -333,423.40 FNMA POOL#0640078 14-Aug-2002 341,029.62 31390ACP3 6.0001%0410112032 DO 04/011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 21-Aug-2002 -6,195,937.50 0IF060493 6.000%09/01/2017 DD 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 6,160,500.00 SC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK -35,437.50 07-Oc62002 11:16:01 &r cwt Wmkbn.h ' Q Mellon jnm -Sam le Report PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 21-Aug-2002 6,195,937.50 0IF060493 6.000%09/012017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 -6,160,500.00 S 35,437.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 21-Aug-2002 6,195,937.50 0IF060493 6.0000/.09/012017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 19-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 28-Aug-2002 7,250,195.31 OIN062699 6.5009/o 09/15/2032 DO 09/011 28-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 23-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 28-Aug-2002 8,285,937.50 OIN062698 6.500%09/152032 DO 09/011 28-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 23-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-Sep-2002 3,075,117.19 0IF052490 5.500%09/01/2017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 -3,045,000.00 S 30,117.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 04-Sep-2002 3,075,117.19 01FOS2490 5.500%09/012017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 19-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 04-Sep-2002 5,120,312.50 0IF060691 6.000%09/012032 DO 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 -4,996,875.00 S 123,437.50 07-0ch1001 11:16.01 ae"dw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 04-Sep-2002 5,120,312.50 0IF060691 6.000%09/Ot/2032 DO 091011 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Sep-2002 6,225,234.38 0IF060493 6.000%09/01/2017 DD 09/011 19-Sep-2002 -6,160,500.00 S 64,734.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 12-Sep-2002 6,225,234.38 0IF060493 6.000%09/012017 DD 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 19-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 12-Sep-2002 3,112,500.00 0IF06D493 6.000%09/012017 DD 091011 19-Sep-2002 -3,080,250.00 S 32,250.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 12-Sep-2002 3,112,500.00 0IF060493 6.000%09/012017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 19-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,OOD.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 19-Sep-2002 5,212,109.38 OINO626A5 6.500%10/152032 DD 10/01/ 23.Oct-2002 -5,164,062.50 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 48,046.88 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 07-Oct-2002 11:16:01 Eeecutive WWkbe.h Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000lW00 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,781.95 FHLMC GROUP 978-6064 01-Aug-2002 5,781.95 31348SW23 6.384%01/01/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,629.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Aug-2002 37.629.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,614.68 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 01-Aug-2002 42,614.69 36225CC20 7.375%06/202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,191,169.68 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C1 01-Sep-2002 191,169.68 83162CU0 6.3409%03/01/2021 01-Sep-2002 -191,169.68 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -191,169.69 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20CI 01-Sep-2002 191,169.68 83162CL30 6.340%03/012021 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54.52 GNMA POOL80438057 01-Sep-2002 54.52 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -51.75 PD 2.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .54.52 GNMA POOL80438057 01-Sep-2002 54.52 36207P'IN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-0c1-2002 11:16..01 Eeecaliw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 422 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -394.74 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Sep-2002 394.74 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -374.69 PD 20.05 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -394.74 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Sep-2002 394.74 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39.58 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Sep-2002 39.58 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 09/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -37.57 PD 2.01 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39.58 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Sep-2002 39.58 36209WBV3 6.000%0 9/1 52 02 8DD09/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .58.86 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Sep-2002 58.86 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028 DD II/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -55.87 PD 2.99 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -58.86 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Sep-2002 58.86 36209EXR8 6.000%I1/152028DD11/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER.PIMCO -57.87 GNMA POOL#0468330 01-Sep-2002 57.87 36209DHF4 6.000%0 511 52 0 2 8 DD 051011 01-Sep-2002 .54.93 PD 2.94 07-0&-2002 11:16:01 Ex .ff.W&kbewh Q Mellon Trust-_Sample Report PAGE 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSPCONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE) AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57.87 GNMA POOL80468330 0ISep-2002 57.87 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DO 05/011 01Sep-2002 0.00 PC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,075.64 GNMA POOLk0467286 01-Sep-2002 1,075.64 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/011 01Sep-2002 -1,021.02 PD 54.62 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,075.64 GNMA POOL 00467296 01Sep-2002 1,075.64 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DO IOMI/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2M 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,086,30 GNMA POOL00457814 01Sep-2002 1.086.30 36208QSB3 6.000Y 10/152028DD 10/01/ 01Sep-2002 -1,031.14 PD 55.16 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,086.30 ONMA POOL80457814 01-Sep-2002 1,096.30 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152028 DD 101011 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,416.50 GNMA POOLOO465555 01-Sep-2002 23,416.50 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-SW2002 -22,227.38 PD 1,189.12 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,416.50 GNMA POOL 80465555 01SW2002 23,416.50 36209AE49 6.000%09/152028 DO 09N1/ 01-SW2002 0.00 . FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11.:16,01 EreaWw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE: 44 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS900010000 01-SEP-2002-3O-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,329.47 ONMA POOL 40465546 01-Sep-2002 1,329.47 36209AEII 6.000%08/15/2028 DD 08/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -1,261.96 PD 67.51 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,329A7 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Sep-2002 029.47 36209AET3 6.0001A 08/15/2028 DD OW011 01-Sq-2002 0.00 PC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -79,726.09 FHLMC GROUP BG5-0476 01-Sep-2002 78,726.09 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 021011 01-Sep-2002 -79,958.70 PD -1,232.62 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -73,726.09 FHLMC GROUP BG5-0476 01-Sep-2002 78,726.08 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 PC I6-Sep-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 40,374.45 FHLMC GROUP BG4-0353 01-Sep-2002 50,374.45 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 031O1/ 01-Sep-2002 -51,649.55 PD -1,275.10 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50,374.45 FHLMC GROUP BG4-0353 01-Sep-2002 50,374A5 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 031011 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC I&Sep.2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26.78 GNMA POOL80500917 OMep-2002 46.78 36210SPA0 6.000%041152029 DD 04/01/ 01Sep-2002 -25.42 PD 1.36 07.Oe1.2002 11:16:01 Exe uw Wakbemb Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 4S PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARPSIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY HI TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SE M DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26.78 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Sep-2002 26.78 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DD04/01/ 01Sep-2002 0.00 PC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,610.41 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Sep-2002 1,610.41 3621000E5 6.000%02/1 52 02 9 DD 02/011 01-Sep-2002 -1,528.63 PD 81.78 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -1,610.41 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Sep-2002 1,610.41 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DO 02101/ 01Sep-2002 0.00 PC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -062.59 GNMA POOL40497343 01Sep-2002 1,362.59 36210NP45 6.000%12J152028 DD 12/01/ 01Sep-2002 -1,293.40 PD 69.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,362.59 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Sep-2002 1,362.59 362IONP45 6.000%12/152028 DD 121011 01-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO .12,725.55 GNMA POOL 00496461 01-Sep-2002 12,725.55 36210MQN4 6.0D0%01/152029 DO DMIl 01-Sep-2002 -12,079.33 PD 646.22 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,725.55 GNMA POOL 00496461 01-Sep.2002 12,725.55 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15IM9 DO 01/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-0ct-2002 11:16.01 Er tive Wwkhemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 46 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .7.31 GNMA P001,80496284 01-Sep-2002 7.31 36210MI51 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -6.94 PD 0.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7.31 GNMA POOLOD496284 01-Sep-2002 7.31 36210MI51 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -42,987.34 GNMA POOLk0503388 01-Sep-2002 42,987.34 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029DD03/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -40,804.39 PD 2,192.95 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -42,987.34 GNMA POOL80503388 01-Sep-2002 42.987.34 36210VF55 6.000'/03/152029DD03/0l/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -621.24 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Sep-2002 621.24 36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -589.69 PD 31.55 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -621.24 GNMA POOL80506636 01-Sep-2002 621.24 3621DYY90 6.000%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-Sep-2002 Uo FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,154.30 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Sep-2002 7,654.30 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -6,791.00 PD 363.30 07-Oct-2001 11:16.01 Executive WNkbewh - Q McOoR Trost-Sam le Re ort PAGE: 47 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURM ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,154.30 GNMA POOL40491103 01-Sep-2002 7,154.30 36210FRY4 6.0004:01/152029DD01/01/ OISep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Se1-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -118,073.41 GNMA POOL#0569358 01-Sep-2002 118,073.41 362000QK3 6.5001/6 04/152032 DO 04/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -120.840.76 PD -2,767.35 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -119,073.41 GNMA POOL#0569358 01-Sep-2002 118,073.41 362000QK3 6.500%04/15/2032 DO 04/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16Sep-20M 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18.942.11 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Sep-2002 18,842.11 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04202030 DO 041011 01-Sep-2002 -18,671.35 PD 170.76 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,842.11 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Sep-2002 18,842.11 36225CNM4 VAR RT 0420203ODD04/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 20-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,321.23 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Sep-2002 2,321.23 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 10Po1/ 01-Sep-2002 .2,203.36 PD 117.97 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,321.23 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Sep-2002 2,321.23 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD IOAII/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-0et-2002 11:16:01 Executive Workbench QMellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE' 48 . PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 MD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,072.48 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Sep-2002 1,072.48 36209DHQD 6.0001/.08/15/2028 DD 08/011 01-Sep-2002 -1,018.02 PD 54.46 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,072.49 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Sep-2002 1,072.48 36209DHQO 6.0WA08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .2,749.10 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Sep-2002 2,749.10 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DD 12101/ 01-Sep-2002 -2,682.09 PD 67.01 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,680.71 GNMA It POOL#0080023 01-Sep-2002 23,680.71 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 1220/2026 DO 12/0119 01-Sep-2002 -24,072.92 PD -392.21 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,690.71 GNMA It POOL#0080023 01-Sep-2002 23,680.71 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 1220/2026 DO 12/0119 01-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 20-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,474.53 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 01-Sep-2002 35,474.53 36225CC20 7.375%06/202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Sep-2002 .36,250.54 PD -776.01 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,474.53 GNMA It POOL#080088M 01-Sep-2002 35,474.53 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06101/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 - FC 20-Sep-2002 0.00 07-0c1-1002 11:16.01 Eeec.mi Wdrkb,.h -' Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Re ort PAGE: 49 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCsG000l0000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -132,566.14 GNMA 11 POOL#080408X 01-Sep-2002 132,566.14 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DO 05/01/ 01-Sep-2002 -131,219.76 PD 1,346.39 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -132,566.14 GNMA 11 POOL 008040OX 01-Sep-2002 132,566.14 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 05/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 PC 20-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,841.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Sep-2002 32,841.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 0811512032 DO 121011 01-Sep-2002 -32,876.49 PD -34.99 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -658.93 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01-Sep-2002 658.93 39810#AE4 7.430%OW012003 DO 0229/0 01-Sep-2002 -649.30 PD 9.63 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -658.93 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01-Sep-2002 658.93 39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DD 022910 01-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 25-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -693.26 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-Sep-2002 693.26 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 1021/9 01-Sep-2002 -678.20 PD 15.06 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,487.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A< 08-Sep-2002 34,487.00 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DD 06/21/9 08-Sep-2002 -35,446.17 PD -959.17 07-Oct-1002 11:16.01 Eeeculin Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 50 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSO-CONSOL/DAFED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SEM DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,487.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A4 09-Sep-2002 34,487.00 74046RFW6 6.430%03/092004 DO 062119 09-Sep-2002 0.00 PC - 09-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,959.44 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Sep-2002 54,959.44 25475MAD6 5.840%10/172011 DD03/181 15-Sep-2002 -56,110.15 PD -1,150.71 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,959.44 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15Sep-2002 54,959.44 25475MAD6 5.840%10(172011 DD 03/18/ IS-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,572.54 GNMA OTT)REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Sep-2002 39,572.54 38371ANX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Sep-2002 -39,572.54 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,572.54 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Sep-2002 39,572.54 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Sep-2002 0.00 FC 16Sep-2002 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-Sep-2002 42,991,400.00 313385E44 MAT 09/032002 03-Sep-2002 .42,991,400.00 MT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct2002 11:16:01 Eeecueive Wolkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 51 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Sep-2002 6,998,638.89 313397E49 MAT 09/032002 03-Sep-2002 -6,998,638.89 MT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,800,000.00 BECFON DICKINSON DISC 05-Sep-2002 1,791,766.00 07588S753 09/052002 05-Sep-2002 -1,791,766.00 MT 05-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 05-Sep-2002 12,199,413.72 313599E66 MAT 09/052002 05-Sep-2002 -12,199,413.72 MT 05-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,50D,D00.00 MERCK&CO INC DISC 12-Sep-2002 1,499,432.50 58933S1C3 09/122002 12-Sep-2002 -1,498,432.50 MT 12-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 13-Sep-2002 2,895,244.00 313397F63 MAT 09/132002 13-Sep-2002 -2,895,244.00 MT 13-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 17-Sep-2002 8,799,547.78 313397G21 MAT 09/17/2002 17-Sep-2002 -9,799,547.78 MT 17-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC IS-Sep-2002 1,494,866.67 02581S111 09/192002 18-Sep-2002 -1,494,866.67 Mp 18-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16.01 Era im Workbench QMellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 53 . PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -85,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO MS 10-Sep-2002 85,000.00 345397RS4 6.550%09/10/2002 DD 09/10/ 10-Sep-2002 -86,759.50 MT 10-Sep-2002 -1,759.50 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 25-Sep-2002 1,000,000.00 3133M82G8 5.840%09/25/2002 DD 03/25/ 25-Sep-2002 -1,013,050.00 MT 25-Sep-2002 -13,050.00 INTEREST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Sep-2002 0.01 996087094 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 03-Sep-2002 0.24 996087094 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 DEAN WITTER DISCOVER&.CO 03-Sep-2002 6,875.00 24240VAC5 6,875%03/012003 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH 03-Sep-2002 5,156,25 590188EP9 6.875%03/01/2003 01-Sep-2002 - 0.00 IT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct1002 11:16.01 &ecufiw WoPkbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 54 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,020,000.00 NIAGARA MOHAWK PWR CORP ST 03-Sep-2002 29,962.50 653522CQ3 5.875%09/01/2002 DO 09/0119 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD MTN 4TR 0011 03-Sep-2002 109,500.00 69512EEU5 7.300%1022/2004 DO 10/22/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-IC 03-Sep-2002 54,649.00 909317BC2 6.831%09/012009 DO 09/22/0 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 03-Sep2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-Sep-2002 8,600.00 313385E44 MAT 09/03/2002 03-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Sep-2002 1,361.11 313397E49 MAT 09/032002 03-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 191,169.68 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C I 03-Sep-2002 130,397.94 83162CLJO 6.3401/603/012021 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 03-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2002 3,293.93 996085247 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 04-Sep-2002 0.00 07-OcF2002 11:16:01 Eecu/ive Wo kbermh Q le Mellon Trust-Sam Report PAGE: 55 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER•PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Sep-2002 9,106.86 996085247 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 04-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC N 05-Sep-20D2 586.28 313589E66 MAT 09/05/2002 05-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 05•Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 05-Sep-2002 8,234.00 07588SJ53 09/05/2002 05-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 05-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 750,000.00 PUBLIC SVC ELEC GAS eTR 0000 06-Sep-2002 9,736.46 74456QAH9 7,900%09/062002 DO 09/06/0 06-Sep-2002 0.00 1T 06-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,487.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99.3 CL A-4 09-Sep-2002 1,851.03 74046RFW6 6.430%03108/2004 DD 06/21/9 08-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 09-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 85,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO NTS 10-Sep-2002 2,783.75 345397RS4 6.550%09/10/2002 DO 091101 10-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 10-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 MERCK&CO INC DISC 12-Sep-2002 1,567.50 58933SJC3 09/12/2002 12-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 12-Sep-2002 0.00 07--0062002 11:16:01 Execullm W&kbenrh - Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 56 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 13-Sep-2002 4,756.00 313397763 MAT 09/132002 13-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 13-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 BOATMENS BANCSHARES INC SUB 16-Sep-2002 13,500.00 096650AE6 6.750%03/152003 DO 03/15/9 15-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 16-Sep-2002 69,562.50 31359MEY5 6.625%0 9/1 520 09 DO 091019 15-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 16-Sep-2002 82,000.00 54267ICT7 8.200%03/152023 DO 032&9 15-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 394.74 GNMA POOL#0486720 16-Sep-2002 95.07 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152029 DD 12/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,154.30 GNMA POOL#0491103 16-Sep-2002 1.070.53 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029DDOI/Ol/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7.31 GNMA POOL#0496284 16-Sep-2002 29.92 36210MJ51 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct-1001 11:16:01 Executive Workbexh Q Mellon Trust-Sam le RP port PAGE.. 57 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,725.55 GNMA POOL 80496461 16-Sep-2002 3,935.26 36210MQN4 6.0001%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT - 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,362.59 GNMA POOL80497343 16-Sep-2002 199.02 36210NP45 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT I6-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,610.41 GNMA POOL 80499153 16-Sep-2002 121.50 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DD 02/011 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26.78 GNMA POOL 80500917 16-Sep-2002 100.47 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 04/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,374.45 FHLMC GROUP BG4-0353 16-Sep-2002 2,340.69 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 03/0V 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 42,987.34 GNMA POOL80503388 16-Sep-2002 3,678.41 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DD 03/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 78,726.08 FHLMC GROUP NG5-0476 16-Sep-2002 3,937.14 3129DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DD 02/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-0Ot-1001 11:16:01 &ecuf/ve WOYkb.M - Q Mellon Trngt-Ssm le Report PAGE..- 58 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 621.24 GNMA POOL 80506636 16-Sep-2002 293.99 36210YY90 6.060%04/152029 DD 04/011 01-SeI0002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54.52 GNMA POOL80438057 16-Sep-2002 204.72 36207PTN9 6.000%05/1 52 0 2 8DD05/OI/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,781.95 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 16-Sep-2002 695.50 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,096.30 GNMA POOLM0457814 16-Sep-2002 369.03 36208QSB3 6.000%1 011 5/202 8 DO 10/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,329.47 GNMA POOL80465546 16-Sep-2002 4,079.20 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,416.50 GNMA POOL80465555 16-Sep-2002 3,926.67 36209AE49 6.000%09/152028 DO 09/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,321.23 GNMA POOL 00467279 16-Sep-2002 219.72 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oe62002 11:16.01 Eeemil.Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 59 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsO000l0000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,075.64 GNMA POOL40467286 16-Sep-2002 3,404.18 36209CCX2 6.0 0 00/0 1 0/1 52 0 2 8 DD 10/011 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT - 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57.87 GNMA POOLM0468330 16-Sep-2002 170.63 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 051011 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,072.48 GNMA POOL#0468339 16-Sep-2002 3,905.08 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028 DO 08/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 58.86 GNMA POOLW0469688 16-Sep-2002 181.43 36209EXR8 6.000%11/15/2028 DD 11/011 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39.58 GNMA POOL 80483452 16-Sep-2002 160.84 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39,572.54 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Sep-2002 2,547.36 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Sep-2002 0.00 1T 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 118,073.41 GNMA POOL 60569358 16-Sep-2002 18,958.33 362000QK3 6.500%04/152032 DD 04/01/ 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 07-0ch2002 11:16.01 &ecullm Wcrkbemh - Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 60 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,959.44 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 16-Sep-2002 2,669.40 25475MAD6 5.840%10/172011 DO 03/18/ 15-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 37,629.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 16-Sep-2002 6,642.14 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DO 121011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 16-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMA 17-Sep-2002 15,922.75 345397SR5 VAR RT 03/172003 DO 03/16/ 17-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 17-Sep-2002 452.2.2 313397G21 MAT D91172D02 17-Se1-2002 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,927.98 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 17-Sep.2002 13,927.99 3133TI7A4 6.000°A 11/152023 DO 11/0119 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 DAIMLER CHRYSLER NA CORP NT 17-Sep-2002 30,222.01 233835AM9 FLTG RT 12/162002 DO 12JI51 17-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 17-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC I8-Sep-2002 5,133.33 02581SJJ1 09/182002 IS-Sep-2002 0.00 IT I8Sep-2002 00 07-Oc(-2001 11:16:01 Executive Wwkbeech Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 61 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/I.OSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 18-Sep-2002 4,159.22 313385G34 MAT09/182002 18-Sep-2002 0.00 IT i&Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-Sep-2002 6,020.00 313385G59 MAT 092O/2002 20-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 20-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,680.71 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 20Sep-2002 2,709.28 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 12/01/9 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 20-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,474.53 ONMA Il POOL#080088M 20-Sep-2002 3,324.89 36225CC20 7.3755/606202027 DD 06/011 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 20-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 132,566.14 GNMA 11 POOL#080408X 20-Sep-2002 17,749.03 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 051011 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 20-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,842.11 GNMA II POOL#0080395 20-Sep-=2 2,044.23 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/202030DD04/01/ 01Sep-2002 0.00 IT 20Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BKS CONS BD 25-Sep-2002 29,200.00 3133M82G8 5.840%09252002 DD 0325/ 25-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 25-Sep-2002 0.00 07-0ct-2002 11:16.01 En jw Wwkb mk Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 62 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-SEP-2002 -30-SEP-2002 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SRARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURTrYID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILO.SS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CM TI I A6 25-Sep-2002 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 25-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 25-Sep-2002 13,347.56 3135891122 MAT 09252002 25Sep-2002 0.00 IT 25-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 658.93 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 25-Sep-2002 2,446.35 398108AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 022910 01-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 25-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO 975,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 26-Sep-2002 2,981.33 3133971438 MAT 09262002 26-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 26-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,00om NATIONAL RURAL DISC 26-Sep-2002 1,750.00 63743D3SI 0926/2002 26-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 26-Sep-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Sep-2002 6,840.00 9128274Y5 3.875%01/152009 DO 011151 0.00 CD 30-SW2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Sep-2002 28,520.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DO 011151 0.00 CD 30Sep-2002 0.00 07-Oct-2002 11:16:01 Esemfive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report_ PAGE. 63 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-SEP-2002-30-SEP-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR 01 SER A 30-Sep-2002 100,625.00 927804ENO 5.750%03/31/2006 DD 03/27/0 30-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 30-Sep-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 30-Sep-2002 18,600.00 073902B36 6.200%03/30/2003 DO 03/30/9 30-Sep-2002 0.00 IT 30-Sep-2002 0.00 F e ilw Wo khemh FAHR COMMITTEE Meed0ngDate Toad.m3/ozar. /o9/oz m/z> AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number FAHRa1-69 19(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources ORIGINATOR: James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor SUBJECT: Safety Policies, Revised Injury and Illness Prevention Program New Accident Investigation Policy GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Revised SAFETY-POL 101, and SAFETY-POL 202, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. SUMMARY Section 6401.7 of the California Labor code requires that every employer establish, implement, and maintain an effective injury prevention program. The program shall be in writing and shall contain the elements defined in section 6401.7. In light of the serious accident of August 6, 2002 at Plant No. 2, staff determined that it was necessary to revise the written Injury and Illness Prevention Program policy to include a section requiring that all District departments conduct a "Safety Stand Down"after a serious injury or incident and add a new communication tool to inform employees about safety and health hazards. As part of the effective Injury Prevention program, each employer shall establish an effective means to investigate industrial accidents (6 CCR 3202 (c) (4)). As a result of the accident of August 6, 2002, staff determined it was necessary to formalize and establish a formal procedure for the existing accident investigation process. These documents presented for your review and adoption represents the District's written Injury and Illness Prevention Program and Accident Investigation Policy that conform with the elements defined in section 6401.7 of the California Labor Code. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Policy required under section 6401.7 of the California Labor Code. ALTERNATIVES Not Applicable CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS 1. Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy (SAFETY-POL-101) 2. Accident Investigation Program (SAFETY-POL-202) QAMAlaaaenaa�AWda flepv6V003 emra npenea�%IMVIem talal Wey Palaes ex R.. WM+ Page 2 O ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Safety and Health Division SAFETY-POL-101 Injury and Illness Prevention Program APPROVALS Approved by: Date: General Manager Approved by: Date: Direcwr of Human Resources Manager Approved by: Date: Human Resources/Safely Manager PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval 0 01/27/2002 1 09/25/2002 This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and Health Division public folder to ensure that they have the latest version. injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 e Contents 1. Purpose............................................................................................... 4 2. Definitions...........................................................................................4 3. Requirements ..................................................................................... 5 3.1 Program Responsibilities .........................................................................6 3.1.1 Administration .....................................................................................6 3.1.2 Management and Supervision ............................................................7 3.1.3 Employee............................................................................................7 3.2 Hazard Awareness and Analysis .............................................................8 3.2.1 Pre-Use Analysis ................................................................................8 3.2.2 Comprehensive Safety and Health Surveys........................................9 3.2.3 Periodic Self Inspections of Work Areas.............................................9 3.2A Routine Hazard Analysis...................................................................10 3.2.5 Employee Reports of Hazards..........................................................10 32.6 Incident and Accident Investigations.................................................10 3.2.7 Pattern Analysis................................................................................11 3.3 Hazard Prevention and Control..............................................................11 3.3.1 Professional Expertise......................................................................11 3.3.2 Written Safety and Health Policies and Procedures..........................11 3.3.3 Process Controls and Personal Protective Equipment......................12 3.3.4 Emergency Preparedness and Planning...........................................12 3.3.5 Preventative Maintenance.................................................................12 3.4 Safety Training.......................................................................................13 3.4.1 Training Profiles................................................................................13 3.4.2 Employee Training............................................................................13 3.5 Safety Communication...........................................................................13 3.5.1 Signage.............................................................................................14 3.5.2 SafetyLine.........................................................................................14 3.5.3 Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins.............................14 3.5.4 Memorandums..................................................................................14 3.5.5 Safety Intranet...................................................................................15 3.5.6 Verbal Communication......................................................................15 3.5.7 Safety Committee .............................................................................15 3.5.8 Safety Suggestion Box......................................................................16 3.5.9 Rewards and Recognition Programs ................................................16 3.5.10 Post Incident Safety Stand Down......................................................16 3.5.11 Safetygram........................................................................................17 3.6 Safety Policy Enforcement and Discipline..............................................17 Injury and Illness Prevention Program smF -POL-101 _ i 3.6.1 Safety Policy Enforcement................................................................17 3.6.2 Discipline for Safety Policy Infractions..............................................17- - 3.7 Accident and Incident Investigations......................................................17 -3.8 Reoordkeeping.......................................................................................18 3.8.1 Inspection Records...........................................................................18 3.8.2 Training Records...............................................................................18 3.8.3 Exposure Monitoring and Medical Records.......................................18 3.9 Integration of Safety Compliance Initiatives...........................................18 3.10 Coordination of Contractor Programs.....................................................18 4. References........................................................................................ 19 5. Attachments ..................................................................................... 20 1. Purpose............................................................................................. 23 2. Requirements ................................................................................... 23 2.1 Written Compliance Programs...............................................................23 Number: SAPETY-POL-101 Orange County Sanitation District Revision Number: 1 Injury and Illness Prevention Program Date: September 25, 2002 Approved by: 1 . Purpose Every California employer must establish, implement and maintain a written Injury and Illness Prevention (IIPP) Program and a copy must be maintained at each worksite. The requirements for establishing, implementing and maintaining an effective written Injury and Illness Prevention Program are contained in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 3203 (8 CCR 3203). The purpose of this Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) is to ensure the District establishes implements and maintains a safety and health program. 2. Definitions CMMS Computerized Maintenance Management System Imminent Hazard Any condition or practice in a place of employment that constitutes a hazard which could reasonably be expected to cause death or serious physical harm immediately or before the imminence of the hazard can be eliminated through regular enforcement procedures. Injury and Illness A written program stating what the District, management and Prevention Plan employees will do with respect to safety. Manager Employee who : • manages, plans, supervises and coordinates the operations and activities of one or more major District divisions and works under general direction or administrative direction of a Department Director of the General Manager, exercising discretion in applying general goals and policy statements and in resolving organizational and service delivery problems and; • Organizes and directs the work of subordinate staff, and; • Assumes significant responsibility for a variety of personnel activities in such areas as selection, training and disciplinary actions and; Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 1/27/02 4 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agendaVahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-8g.l.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 • Assumes significant responsibility for the preparation and administration of the assigned budget(s) Process A series of actions or operations directed toward a result. Program The person assigned the task of maintaining and auditing the Administrator Injury and Illness Prevention Program Red Tag A red colored tag placed by an employee prohibiting the use tools or equipment because of the belief that the use of the tool or equipment will result in an accident or injury. Supervisor Employee who: Supervises, assigns and reviews the work of subordinates in assigned sections or work units and; Works under direction or general direction of higher level supervisory or management staff, exercising discretion in selecting appropriate resources to use in accomplishing assigned work and; Assumes responsibility for recommending a variety of personnel actions in such areas as performance evaluation, training, selection and disciplinary measures and; Ensures that appropriate policies and procedures are followed by subordinates and; • Monitors, coordinates and assists in developing the budget for assigned area Safety Committee A committee made up of employees representing District management and represented employees who meet to set safety goals and objectives and to solve safety related issues 3. Requirements The required elements listed below are the ten elements of the Injury and Illness Prevention Program as required by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal- OSHA). Specific details of each element may be found in specific referenced standard operating procedures, where applicable. Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 5 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr20G2\2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.1 Program Responsibilities This section outlines the responsibilities for the implementation and maintenance of this Injury and Illness Prevention Program. 3.1.1 Administration 1. The Safety Division (Safety) shall be responsible for maintaining the written Injury and Illness Prevention Program. A. The Safety Supervisor shall be the IIPP Program Administrator. 2. The Executive Management team (EMT) shall ensure that the District's safety programs have sufficient resources to maintain a safe and healthful workplace. Resources include but are not limited to: A. A competent safety staff. B. An adequate budget to maintain and improve the safety and emergency response program. C. An adequate budget for required controls to minimize safety a nd health risks to District personnel, suppliers and the public. D. An adequate budget for required personal protective equipment as determined by Safety. E. Time for District staff to attend required safety training at a frequency and duration determined by Safety. 3. The Safety Division, in coordination with affected divisions, shall be responsible for ensuring that safety policy, safety procedures, safety programs and safe work practices are developed. 4. Safety Division personnel shall have the authority to ensure that unsafe operations are stopped and that unsafe tools and equipment are removed from service in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.2, Red Tag Authority or if they believe, in their professional judgment, an imminent danger exists. 5. The District's General Manager shall be responsible for Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 6 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda%fahrkfahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 ensuring District managers and supervisors comply with the provisions of this IIPP and other safety and health . programs. 6. The Manager over the Safety Division shall be responsible for ensuring the IIPP and other safety and health programs are implemented. 7. A copy of this IIPP shall be available to all employees either in an electronic or hard copy format. 3.1.2 Management and Supervision 1. Management and supervision shall ensure employees are provided with the proper tools and personal protective equipment. 2. Management and supervision shall ensure employees follow safe work practices, including but not limited to the wearing of personal protective equipment. 3. Management and supervision shall ensure employees are appropriately disciplined for infractions of safety rules, policies, procedures and programs. 4. Management and supervision shall ensure periodic inspections of work areas are completed and documented in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.1, Periodic Workplace Inspections. 5. Management and Supervision shall ensure that unsafe operations are stopped and that unsafe tools and equipment are removed from service in accordance with SAFETY- SOP-101.2, Red Tag Authority. .6. Management and supervision shall ensure identified hazards are reported, documented and corrected. 3.1.3 Employee 1. Employees shall comply with safe work practices, policies, procedures and safety programs. 2. Employees shall conduct daily inspections of their work area to check for unsafe conditions. This includes but is not Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 925/02 7 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agendalfahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-8g.l.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-PAL-101 limited to: A. Personal protective equipment B. Safety equipment such as fire extinguishers, safety showers and eyewashes C. Tools and equipment D. Vehicles. 3. Employees shall correct unsafe conditions as soon as possible, including the replacement of personal protective equipment. 4. Employees shall report unsafe conditions that cannot be corrected to supervision immediately and submit a CMMS request. 5. Employees shall attend safety training at the scheduled time. 6. Employees escorting contractors, vendors or visitors shall ensure that the proper personal protective equipment is used at all times and all safe work practices are observed. 3.2 Hazard Awareness and Analysis The District has developed procedures for identifying and evaluating work place hazards, including scheduled periodic inspections to identify unsafe conditions and work practices. Inspection guidelines may be found in SAFETY-SOP-101.1, Periodic Workplace Inspection Procedures. 3.2.1 Pre-Use Analysis Engineering, Operation and Maintenance, Process Engineering, Facilities Maintenance, Purchasing or any other division proposing any process change that has the potential to impact the safety and health of District employees, contractors or visitors shall, in coordination with Safety, conduct a pre-use analysis to determine the impact on safety. Pre-use analysis shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.3 Pre- Use Analysis. Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 8 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahrVah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-'101 3.2.2 Comprehensive Safety and Health Surveys The Safety Division, in coordination with management and supervision, shall determine the scope and frequency for any comprehensive safety, health or industrial hygiene surveys. Survey scope and frequency shall be based upon: 1. Regulatory requirements. 2. Literature review for new information on recognized hazards. 3. Whenever new substances, processes, procedures, or equipment are introduced to the workplace that represent a new occupational safety and health hazard. 4. Employee input when applicable. 5. The best judgment of Safety. The frequency of inspections shall not exceed one inspection per calendar quarter. 3.2.3 Periodic Self Inspections of Work Areas 1. Division management and supervision shall be responsible for conducting periodic inspections of each work area to identify and evaluate hazards. 2. Periodic inspections shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.1, Periodic workplace Inspections. 3. Whenever new substances, processes, procedures, or equipment are introduced to the workplace that represent a new occupational safety and health hazard, supervision and/or management shall contact Safety to assisf in a pre- Use Assessment in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.3, Pre-Use Analysis. 4. Whenever a manager/supervisor is made aware of a new or previously unrecognized hazard, Safety shall be contacted. 5. Division management and supervision shall not rely on periodic inspections performed by other divisions or committees as a substitute for required inspections. Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 9 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr20D2\2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.2.4 Routine Hazard Analysis The Safety Division routinely conducts hazard analysis of District operations and construction activities for jobs the Safety Division deems hazardous and all confined space entries. 3.2.5 Employee Reports of Hazards Employees are encouraged to report known and potential safety and health hazards. Mechanisms for reporting these hazards include: 1. Reports to management and supervision 2. Reports through CMMS 3. Electronic mail (e-mail)to SafetyLine or Safety staff 4. Safety Suggestion boxes 5. Safety committee meetings 6. Reports to an employee's bargaining unit representative 7. Face to face meetings with Safety staff. 3.2.6 Incident and Accident Investigations Incident and accident investigations are conducted on all incidents requiring a Property Disposition Report, all motor vehicle accidents and all Cal-OSHA recordable injuries. Other incidents may be investigated at the discretion of Safety. Accident investigations shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting. Incident and accident investigations are conducted on all incidents involving $ 1,000.00 of property damage, all motor vehicle accidents and all Cal-OSHA recordable injuries. Other incidents may be investigated at the discretion of Safety. Accident investigations shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting. 3.2.7 Pattern Analysis Cal-OSHA logs and accident investigations shall be periodically reviewed by Safety to determine if any accidents or near misses Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 10 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL401 have similarities. 3.3. Hazard Prevention and Control Accidents are prevented through the timely recognition and correction of hazards before someone is injured or property is _ damaged. 3.3.1 Professional Expertise The District will ensure that safety and emergency response division staff is adequately trained in the hazards inherent to a wastewater treatment plant. This includes providing staff with the resources necessary to perform assigned jobs, including but not limited to the following: 1. Annual professional development 2. Certification maintenance as required by the certification authority, and as provided by district policy on certification reimbursement 3. Professional memberships 4. Reference materials, such as: A. Books B. Codes, laws, regulations and consensus standards C. Internet access in accordance with established district policy. 3.3.2 Written Safety and Health Policies and Procedures The District will develop and maintain safety policies, procedures and programs to ensure compliance with applicable Federal OSHA and Cal-OSHA requirements. Safety Policies and Procedure titles may be found in SAFETY-SOP-000.1 Control of Polices, Procedures, Programs. 3.3.3 Process Controls and Personal Protective Equipment The District shall use engineering controls to reduce employee Rev, 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 11 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-8g.t.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 exposures to physical and chemical hazards. Personal protective equipment shall be used when engineering controls . are not feasible, have not been installed, or when emergency situations dictate such use. The District shall provide all required personal protective equipment, except as noted in SAFETY-SOP-102.8, Employee Procured Personal Protective Equipment. 3.3A Emergency Preparedness and Planning The District has developed an Integrated Emergency Response Plan designed to prepare the District and employees for all types of emergencies, including but not limited to: 1. Medical emergencies 2. Fires 3. Earthquakes 4. Floods 5. High water flows 6. Utility outages 7. Hazardous materials spills 8. Threatened or actual terrorist activities 3.3.5 Preventative Maintenance The operations and facilities maintenance divisions have developed a preventative maintenance program to ensure critical equipment does not fail and that safety related equipment is properly maintained. The CMMS system tracks the scheduled maintenance of these items. 3.4 Safety Training Safety training is required for all District employees. New employees shall receive a New Employee Safety Orientation to familiarize them with the hazards of a wastewater treatment plant and District safety policies and procedures. Safety training is typically based on job classification, hazards that will be anticipated in a job and the employee's actual job duties. Rev. i Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9125102 12 of 29 g:lwp.dtatagendaUahnfah2 0 0 2120 02 agenda reports%02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.4.1 Training Profiles The Safety shall meet with the manager or supervisor of each employee to determine which safety training classes shall be attended by each employee. Once a safety training profile has been developed for an employee, the training listed on the profile is mandatory. Safety and manager/supervisor shall use the following criteria to determine safety training requirements: 1. Job description 2. Actual job duties 3. The anticipated job tasks of the employee 4. Anticipated future job tasks 5. Regulatory requirements 6. District requirements based on i. Previous job task requirements ii. Best industry practices. 3.4.2 Employee Training Employees shall receive safety training before they are required to perform a task and at the frequency specked in specific safety policies and procedures. 3.5 Safety Communication The District utilizes several methods to communicate safety and health requirements, safety warnings and safety tips to all employees. 3.5.1 Signage The District posts hazard-warning signs where necessary to communicate safety and health requirements, safety warnings and safety tips to all employees. Signage is posted in accordance with Tide 8 CCR §3340. Accident Prevention Signs. Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 925IO2 13 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agandaVahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-09.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.5.2 SafetyLine SafetyLine is a short tip on a variety of safety topics that affect District staff both on and off the job. SafetyLine is distributed to all District employees with e-mail accounts on payday. 3.5.3 Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins SAFE bulletins are issued on specific safety related items explaining how something should be done, or explaining how speck components of a safety program are to be implemented. Requirements and guidelines for developing SAFE Bulletins may be found in SAFETY-POL-103, Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins. 1. SAFE Bulletins shall be considered District policy for items not covered by specific policies. 2. A list of SAFE Bulletins may be found in SAFE Bulletin 000, List of SAFE Bulletins. 3. SAFE Bulletins shall be reviewed at least every 3 years. 4. SAFE Bulletins greater than three (3) years old shall not be considered District policy. 3.5.4 Memorandums The Safety Division will periodically issue memorandums regarding specific safety, health and hazardous waste issues. 1. Memorandums shall be limited to a single topic. 2. Memorandums may be issued for the following reasons: A. To clarify an existing policy B. To implement a new policy on an emergency basis (1) Memorandums implementing new policy requirements shall only be in force until: a. A new policy has been developed; or b. A SAFE bulletin has been developed; or c. A Ninety (90) day time period has elapsed Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 14 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02.89.1.tloc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL401 C. To provide information D. To offer recommendations 3. A memorandum shall not revoke orsupercede an adopted policy, unless authorized by the Director of Human Resources and the General Manager by signature. 4. E-mail shall not replace a memorandum. 3.5.5 Safety Intranet The Safety Division maintains an intranet site where employees can go to obtain information on safety and health issues. Employees can access the Safety Intranet site by following the instructions in attachment A. 3.5.6 Verbal Communication Safety Division staff is available for contact regarding concerns over safety and health issues. 1. V erbal communication s hall n of be u sed to c hange D istrict policy. 3.5.7 Safety Committee The district has agreed to form a labor-management safety committee to address work related safety concerns. In addition, subject specific safety sub committees may be formed at any time with the concurrence of the Labor-Management Safety Committee to address specific safety concerns: Safety Committees shall be governed in accordance with SAFETY- SOP-000.7, Safety Committees. 3.5.8 Safety Suggestion Box There are Safety Suggestion Boxes located around both Plant 1 and Plant 2. The purpose of the boxes is to allow employees to submit suggestions to Safety either by identifying themselves or anonymously. Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25102 15 of 29 g:lwp.dtalagendaVehrNfahr2D02k2002 agenda reportsk02-89.1.dw Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.5.9 Rewards and Recognition Programs Safety has developed a rewards and recognition program for employees who go above and beyond safe work practices and consistently display a positive safety attitude. 3.5.10 Post Incident Safety Stand Down A Safety Stand Down is a procedure in which all managerial personnel shall order a review of pertinent safety requirements for their employees. The review shall be a minimum of 30 minutes to discuss safety issues that affect their specific work group or to discuss an incident that may have occurred on a District job site. The Safety Stand Down shall occur no later than the next work shift following an incident. A Safety Stand Down shall occur when any of the following conditions occur: 1. An injury to a District employee that requires a report be made to Cal-OSHA. 2. A fatality that occurred to any persons on any District job site. 3. Any accident that results in the overnight hospitalization of 2 or more employees, District personnel or contractor personnel. 4. The District's General Manager, in consultation with the Safety and Health Division determines the need for a Safety Stand Down. A. Department and Division Managers and Supervisors may call for a Safety Stand Down at any time for their respective department and/or division. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for disseminating information regarding any incident requiring a Safety Stand Down and any additional information requested by management. 3.5.11 Safetygram Safetygrams are developed by the Safety and Health Division for use by management and supervision as safety tailgate meeting Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 16 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-69.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL•101 topics. The topics are designed to be approximately five (5) minutes in length. 3.6 Safety Policy Enforcement and Discipline All employees, including managers and supervisors, are responsible for complying with safe and healthful work practices. All employees are responsible for complying with safety rules, policies and procedures. 3.6.1 Safety Policy Enforcement Each employee has a responsibility to ensure that work is performed in a safe manner. Employees shall report violations of safety rules and policies in accordance with established District procedures. 3.6.2 Discipline for Safety Policy Infractions Employees who violate safety rules, policies and procedures are subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Discipline shall be implemented in accordance with established District policies, and bargaining unit MOUs where appropriate. Supervision and management shall be responsible for disciplining workers for failure to comply with safe and healthful work practices. 3.7 Accident and Incident Investigations All accidents and near misses shall be investigated promptly. Accident and incident investigation shall be conducted in accordance with Safety-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting. 3.6 Recordkeeping Records shall be maintained in accordance with specific Cal- OSHA requirements. Records not mentioned below are maintained in accordance with specific policies and procedures. Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 17 of 29 g:Xwp.dta\agenda%MhrXfahr2002\2002 agenda reports102-99.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY•POL401 3.8.1 Inspection Records Records of safety inspections shall be kept 12 months after the last item found deficient has been corrected. Copies of safety inspections shall be kept in the Safety Office at Plant No. 1. 3.8.2 Training Records Employee safety training records shall be maintained in Training Server, an electronic database. These records are retained for the length of district employment, plus five (5) years. 3.8.3 Exposure Monitoring and Medical Records Exposure monitoring and medical records shall be retained in accordance with SAFETY-POL-403, Access to Employee Medical Records and Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3204. Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records. 3.9 Integration of Safety Compliance Initiatives One goal of the District's safety and health program is to ensure that safety programs are not in conflict with one another. A second goal is to ensure that the District's overall mission can be accomplished while providing a safe and healthful work environment and achieving overall compliance with all applicable regulations and laws. 3.10 Coordination of Contractor Programs The D istrict requires all contractors that conduct business with the District to have a safety program in place and conform to District, state and federal requirements. Requirements for contractors may be found in SAFETY-POL-108, Contractor Safety Programs. 4. References Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3203. Injury and Illness Prevention Program Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3204. Access to Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 18 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02.89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 Employee Exposure and Medical Records Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3340. Accident Prevention Signs California Labor Code, Sections 142.3, 4558 and 6401.7 California Government Code, Section 11346. California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Division 1, Department of Industrial Relations California Code of Regulations, Tide 22, Division 4.5 Hazardous Waste Management SAFETY-SOP-000.1, Control of Polices, Procedures, Programs SAFETY-SOP-000.7, Safety Committees SAFETY-SOP-101.1, Periodic Workplace Inspections SAFETY-SOP-101.2, Red Tag Authority SAFETY-SOP-101.3, Pre-Use Analysis SAFETY-SOP-102.8, Employee Procured Personal Protective Equipment SAFETY-POL-102, Personal Protective Equipment SAFETY-POL-103, Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins SAFETY-POL-104, Permit Required Confined Spaces SAFETY-POL-105, Hazardous Energy Control SAFETY-POL-106, Hearing Conservation SAFETY-POL-108, Contractor Safety Programs SAFETY-POL-109, Respiratory Protection Program SAFETY-POL-110, Radiation Safety Program SAFETY-POL-111, Chemical Hygiene Plan SAFETY-POL-112, Integrated Emergency Response Program SAFETY-POL-113 Exposure to Pathogens Program Rev, 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 19 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2 0 0212 0 0 2 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 SAFETY-POL-201, Fire Prevention SAFETY-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-203, Ergonomics SAFETY-POL-204, Fall Protection SAFETY-POL-205, Electrical Safety SAFETY-POL-301, Vehicle Safety Operations (including carts and bicycles) SAFETY-POL-302, Marine Safety SAFETY-POL-303, Crane Safety SAFETY-POL-304, Forklift Operation SAFETY-POL-401, Medical Examinations 5. Attachments Attachment A: Access to Safety Intranet Site Attachment B: District Safety and Health Programs Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 925/02 20 of 29 g:\wp.dtalagendaVahrVahr200212002 agenda reports102-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 Attachment A: Access to Safety Intranet Site 1. After logging into the District's computer network, open the Internet by placing the cursor over the "Internet Explorer" icon and double click with the left button on the _ mouse. 2. Once the Internet Explorer has opened on the home page, type "WIN" into the Internet browser box. Push the "Enter" key. 3. Using the mouse, move the cursor over the "Departments" button, double click on the button. 4. Using the mouse, move the cursor over the "530 Safety" button. Double click on the button. 5. Select the specific topic you wish to view by placing the cursor over the topic and double clicking on the button. Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 21 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL401 Attachment B: District Safety and Health Programs Contents 1. Purpose............................................................................................. 23 2. Requirements ................................................................................... 23 2.1 Written Compliance Programs.........................................................................23 Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 925/02 22 of 29 g:\wp.dtalagendaVahrlfah200212002 agenda reportsNO2-89.1.doc 1 . Purpose To promote a safe work environment for all employees and to ensure the District meets the safety-related legal requirements for written compliance programs. 2. Requirements It is the District's policy to provide a safe work environment for its employees. The District is committed to ensuring compliance with all safety-related legal requirements and providing the necessary training to meet these requirements. 2.1 Written Compliance Programs The written compliance programs, which are detailed in specific Safety Policies, Procedures or Safety Programs (SPs), covered by this policy are: 1. Injury and Illness Prevention Program This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Titie8, §3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL- 101, Injury and Illness Prevention Program and SAFETY- SP-101 District Safety and Health Program. The program includes information on safety commitment and responsibilities, hazard recognition, hazard assessment and control, safety communications, safety training, accident reporting and investigation, safety committees, and recordkeeping. 2. Personal Protective Equipment This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 3380, Personal Protective Devices. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-102 Personal Protective Equipment. This program includes the requirements for selection, use, and care for devices designed for head, eye, body, hand, and foot protection. Rev.A Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 1I30I01 23 of 28 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY4'9L-101 . 3. Safety Awareness For Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins 4. SAFE bulletins are bulletins issued on specific safety related items explaining how something should be done, or explaining how specific components of a safety program are to be implemented. SAFE Bulletins shall be considered District policy for items not covered by specific policies. SAFE Bulletins shall be reviewed at least every 3 years. SAFE Bulletins older than 3 years old shall not be considered District policy. The policy for the development of SAFE Bulletins may be found in SAFETY-POL-103, Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins 5. Permit Required Confined Spaces This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 5157, Permit-Required Confined Spaces. To meet the intent of the regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL- 104, Permit Required Confined Spaces and SAFETY-SP- 104 Permit Required Confined Spaces. This program includes the requirements for the entrant, attendant, entry supervisor, and rescue team for confined space entry activities. 6. Hazardous Energy Control This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 3314 Cleaning, Repairing, Servicing and Adjusting Prime Movers, M achinery a nd E quipment. To meet t he I ntent o f this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL- 105, Hazardous Energy Control Programs and SAFETY-SP- 105 Hazardous Energy Control. This program includes the requirements for working on or around equipment that is energized or has the potential to contain residual-energy. 7. Hearing Conservation This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 5097, Hearing Conservation. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-106, Hearing Conservation Programs and SAFETY-SP-106 Hearing Conservation. This program includes the requirements for designating areas where hearing protection is required and the selection, use, and care for hearing protection devices. Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Dale 9/25/02 24 of 29 g:lwp.dtalagenda\fahrVahr2 0 0212 0 0 2 agenda reports\02-e9.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 8. Integrated Emergency Response Program This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 3220 Emergency Action Plan, § 3221 Fire Prevention Plan, § Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response; CCR Title 19. § 2620 at seq. and Health and Safety Code § 25500 at seq. Minimum Standards for Business, § 2400 at seq. Standardized Emergency Management Systems; Title 22, § 66265.30 through 37, Preparedness and Prevention Plan, § 66265.50 through 56, Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures; 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 112, Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan. To meet the intent of all the regulations, t he D istrict It as d eveloped S AFETY-POL-112, Integrated Emergency Response Plan and SAFETY-SP- 112 Integrated Emergency Response Plan. This plan is divided into Volumes I and 11. Volume I, Emergency Preparedness, contains the specific plans for preparing for an emergency. Volume 11, Emergency Procedures, contains the specific plans and procedures to be implemented in response to an emergency. 9. DOT Substance Abuse and Alcohol Misuse This program is mandated by DOT 49 CFR, Chapter 111, Part 382, Controlled Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-SP-107 DOT Substance Abuse and Alcohol Misuse Program. This program includes the requirements for all District employees required to maintain a commercial driver's license as part of their job responsibilities. The program includes the requirements for training, driver conduct, prohibition, handling of test results and record retention, consequences of testing positive and use-related conduct, and confidentiality. 10. Respiratory Protection This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 5144, Respiratory Protection. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-109 Respiratory Protection Program. This program includes the duties of the program administrator, supervisor, and respiratory user. Also defined in the program are the requirements for the selection, inspection, use. Rev. i Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 25 of 29 g:\wp,dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL401 maintenance, and storage of respiratory protection devices. 9. Radiation Safety Program This program is mandated by CCR Title 17, Division 1, Chapter 5, Subchapter 4, Radiation and Cal-OSHA Title 8, § 5076, Radiation and Radioactivity, Administrative _ Procedures. To meet the intent of the regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-110 Radiation Safety Program. This program includes the requirements for nuclear gauge users, contractors, service representatives, and visitors who enter into restricted areas where radioactive materials are used or stored. 10. Chemical Hygiene Plan This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 5191, Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-111 Chemical Hygiene Plan and Appendix B of the Laboratory Operating Procedures Manual. This program includes the duties oft he Chemical Hygiene Officer, supervisor, and laboratory employee. 11. Exposure to Pathogens Program(Bloodbome Pathogens) This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 5193, Bloodbome Pathogens for our Emergency Medical Team. Other aspects of the program are voluntary, but follow best industry practices. To meet the intent of the regulation referenced above, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-113 Exposure to Pathogens and SAFETY-SOP-113-1 Exposure Control Plan. 12. Hazard Communication Program This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 5194, Hazard Communication. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-501, Hazard Communication. This program includes the requirements for training, use, labeling, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) and employee training and education. 13. Contractor Safety Programs Rev. f Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 26 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahrlfah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Tide 8, Subchapter 4, Construction - " Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-108, Contractor Safety Programs. This program includes the requirements for Contractor oversight for safety and health related issues by _ the District during the completion of contracts. 14. Fire Prevention Programs This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Sections (§) 3220, Emergency Action Plan, 3221, Fire Prevention Plan and 6150-6184, Fire Protection. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-201 Fire Prevention. This program includes the requirements for the training of employees on evacuations, and fire systems maintenance, testing and upkeep. 15. Ergonomics This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 5110, Ergonomics. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-203 Ergonomics. This program includes the requirements for evaluation of workstations, the selection, use, and care for devices designed to reduce hazards in the work place that can lead to repetitive motion and cumulative trauma injuries. 16. Fall Protection This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Chapter 4, Subchapter 4, Construction Safety Orders and Subchapter 7,' General Industry Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-204, Fall Protection. This program includes the requirements for use of fixed, portable and personal fall protection equipment. 17. Electrical Safety This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Sections (§)2299-2974, Electrical Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-205 Electrical Safety_ Rev" 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 27 of 29 g:lwp.dtalagenda\fahrlfahr2002t2002 agenda reponst02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program I SAFETY-POL-101 This program includes the requirements for electrical installations, work practices when working on electrical , - equipment and the required personal protective equipment. 16. Vehicle Safety This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, as a general _ requirement of the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-301, Vehicle Safety. This program includes the requirements for vehicle inspection, vehicle maintenance and driver surveillance. 19. Marine Safety This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, as a general requirement of the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-302, Marine Safety. 20. Crane Safety This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Chapter 4, Subchapter 7, Group 13, Cranes and Other Hoisting Equipment. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY- POL-303, Crane Safety. This program includes the requirements for training of personnel, inspection and maintenance of cranes. 21. Forklifts This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Article 25, Industrial Trucks. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-304, Forklift Operation. This ' program includes the requirements for training of personnel, inspection and maintenance of forklifts. 22. Medical Programs This program is mandated by several different Cal-OSHA standards in California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Chapter 4, subchapter 7, General Industry Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-401, Medical Examinations. This program includes the requirements for conducting medical Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9125/02 28 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agendakfahr\fahr2002%2002 agenda reports\02-89.1.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 surveillance on employees exposed to potentially hazardous work environments. 23. Hazardous Waste Management This programismandated by Cal-EPA, CalifomiaC ode of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 4.5 Hazardous Waste - Management. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-502 Hazardous Substance Management. This program includes the requirements for identification, packaging, labeling and disposal of hazardous waste. Requirements for training employees are also included. Rev. 1 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 9/25/02 29 of 29 g:\wp.dta\agendakfahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-59.1.doc ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Safety and Health Division SAFETY-POL-202 Accident Investigation and Reporting APPROVALS Approved by: Date: Director of Human Resources Approved by: Date: Manager,Human Resources Approved by: Date: Safety Supervisor PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval p 9/25/02 This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and Health public folder to ensure that they have the latest version. Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 Contents 1. Purpose............................................................................................... 3 2. Definitions........................................................................................... 3 3. Requirements and Responsibilities.................................................. 5 3.1 General Requirements.............................................................................5 3.1.1 Safety and Health Division Responsibilities........................................6 3.1.2 Manager and Supervisor Responsibilities...........................................7 3.1.3 Employee Responsibilities..................................................................7 3.2 Accidents In Which Personnel Are Injured or Equipment is Damaged.....8 3.2.1 Off Site Accidents ...............................................................................9 3.2.2 On Site..............................................................................................11 3.3 Near Miss Accidents ..............................................................................12 3.4 Safety-Health Investigation Team..........................................................13 3.5 Employee Training.................................................................................14 3.6 Program Administration..........................................................................14 4. References........................................................................................ 14 5. Attachments ..................................................................................... 15 Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date: 0//25/2002 2 of 15 g:kwp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc Number: SAFETY-POL-202 Orange County Sanitation District - - - Revision Number: 0 Accident Investigation and Reporting Date: Approved by: 1 . Purpose The purpose of this policy is to outline the process to report incidents and accidents and to ensure investigations of these incidents and accidents are properly conducted. This policy applies to all Cal-OSHA recordable injuries, all incidents involving $ 2,500.00 of property damage, all motor vehicle accidents and all near miss accidents that may have resulted in any of the above. Other incidents or accidents may be investigated at the discretion of the supervisor or the Safety and Health Division. This policy includes all district employee, contractor and visitor accidents and incidents 2. Definitions Accident An unplanned, undesired event, not necessarily resulting in injury, but damaging to property and/or interrupting the activity in process, maintenance or construction. Contractor A company performing work for the district under a contract. This includes subcontractors. First aid Is any one-time treatment, and any follow-up visit for the purpose of observation of minor scratches, cuts, bums, splinters, and so forth, which do not ordinarily require medical care. Such one-time treatment, and follow-up visit for the purpose of observation, is considered f irst aid even though provided by a physician or registered professional personnel. Incident An undesired event that may cause personal harm or other damage. Lost workdays The number of days (consecutive or not) after, but not including, the day of injury or illness during which the employee would have worked but could not do so; that is, could not perform all or any part of his normal assignment during all or any part of the workday or shift, because of the occupational injury or illness. Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date: 3 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002QD02 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc Accldent Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 Manager Employee who : • manages, plans, supervises and coordinates the operations and activities of one or more major District divisions and works under general direction or administrative direction of a Department Director or the General Manager, exercising discretion in applying general goals and policy statements and in resolving organizational and service delivery problems and; • Organizes and directs the work of subordinate staff, and; • Assumes significant responsibility for a variety of personnel activities in such areas as selection, training and disciplinary actions and; • Assumes significant responsibility for the preparation and administration of assigned budget(s) Near Miss An unplanned, undesired event, not necessarily resulting in injury, o r d amage to p roperty a nd/or i nterrupting t he a ctivity i n process, but the event could have lead to injury, property damage or process interruption. Recordable Injury Any occupational injuries or illnesses which result in fatalities, regardless of the time between the injury and death, or the length of the illness; or lost workday cases, other than fatalities, that result in lost workdays; or nonfatal cases without lost workdays which result in transfer to another job or termination of employment, or require medical treatment (other than first aid)or involve loss of consciousness or restriction of work or motion. This category also includes any diagnosed occupational illnesses which are reported to the employer but are not classified as fatalities or lost workday cases. Reportable Injury Any serious injury or illness, or death, of an employee occurring in a place of employment or in connection with any employment. Serious Injury or Means any injury or illness occurring in a place of employment Illness or in connection with any employment which requires inpatient hospitalization for a period in excess of 24 hours for other than medical observation or in which an employee suffers a loss of any member of the body or suffers any serious degree of permanent disfigurement. Supervisor Employee who: -Supervises, assigns and reviews the work of subordinates in Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date: 0//25/2002 4 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agendalfahr\fah200212002 agenda reports\02-99.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 assigned sections or work units, and; -Works under direction or general direction of higher level supervisory or management staff, exercising discretion in selecting appropriate resources to use in accomplishing assigned work, and; -Assumes responsibility for recommending a variety of personnel actions in such areas as performance evaluation, training, selection and disciplinary measures, and; -Ensures that appropriate policies and procedures are followed by subordinates, and; .Monitors, coordinates and assists in developing the budget for assigned area Vehicle Is a device by which any person or property may be propelled, moved, or drawn upon a highway, excepting a device moved exclusively by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks. This includes electric carts and bicycles. 3. Requirements and Responsibilities 3.1 General Requirements 1. Accident/incident investigations shall be fact-finding, not fault finding. 2. The Safety and Health Division shall be immediately notified by the responsible manager/supervisor of all accidents/incidents that : A. Require an outside agency to respond to a medical aid situation. B. Involve a motor vehicle and an injury while the driver is on district business. C. Involve a vehicle that is on district property. D. Involve more than $2,500 in property damage. Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date: 0/125/2002 5 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr20Q2\2002 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY•POL-202 E. Is a Cal-OSHA reportable or recordable injury. F. Involve a response of the district's emergency medical unit. 3. Completed accident investigation reports involving district staff shall be returned to the Safety and Health Division Office no later than three (3) days following the accident/incident by the supervisor/manager of the person(s) injured. 4. Completed accident/incident investigation reports for accidents involving contractor personnel or visitors shall be submitted to the Safety and Health Division office with in five (5) business days of the accident/incident by the division responsible for managing the contractor or visitor. 3.1.1 Safety and Health Division Responsibilities 1. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for developing and implementing the Accident Investigation and Reporting Program. 2. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for maintaining accident reports and OSHA recordkeeping activities. 3. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for coordinating the activities for supplemental accident/incident investigations. 4. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for notifying Cal-OSHA of all reportable accidents. 5. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for conducting training for employees on proper accident investigation techniques. 3.1.2 Manager and Supervisor Responsibilities 1. Managers and supervisors shall be responsible for conducting accident/incident investigations in accordance with established procedures. Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date: 0//25/2002 6 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 2. Managers and supervisors shall be responsible for ensuring all accident and incident reports are completed and returned - to the Safety and Health Division within 3 days of the accident. (Five days for contractor or visitor accidents/incidents) 3. Managers and/or supervisors shall be responsible for ensuring all recommended corrective actions are addressed and completed. 3.1.3 Employee Responsibilities 1. Employees s hall report a II a ccidents a nd i ncidents to t heir manager/supervisor on the same shift the accident or incident occurred. A. The manager/supervisor shall document the accident or incident and forward the report to the Safety and Health Division. 2. Employees shall report all near miss accidents/incidents to either their manager/supervisor or the Safety and Health Division on the same shift the accident or incident occurred. 3. Employees shall fully cooperate with managers, supervisors and Safety and Health personnel who are conducting the accidentlincident investigation. A. Employees may have bargaining unit representation present during accident investigations. 4. Employees shall promptly complete and return all paperwork regarding the incident/accident as required. 3.2 Accidents In Which Personnel Are Injured or Equipment is Damaged 1. If the accident is serious and the employee is unable to leave the scene of the accident, help shall be summoned, using the extension 222 emergency number. A. The Control Center shall notify: (1) The Medical Unit Team if the accident/incident is at Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date: 0//25/2002 7 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002MO2 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 Plant 1 or Plant 2. (2) Outside Medical services as required (911). (3) Safety and Health Division personnel. (4) The appropriate management personnel. B. Notification shall be by : (1) Land telephone. (2) Cellular telephone (including Nextel). (3) Mobile radio. 2. The Control Center shall dispatch personnel to meet outside medical services at the front gate as necessary and escort them to the accident site. 3. The employee or another employee shall notify their supervisor of an accident. 4. After the injured person is tended to, an accidentfincident investigation shall be started by the supervisor as soon as possible. A. The supervisor shall complete the Accident Report form. 5. The accident investigation shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-202.1, Accidents In Which Personnel Are Injured. 6. The supervisor/manager may contact the Safety and Health Division for assistance with the accident investigation. 7. The accident scene shall be preserved until the accident investigation has been completed. 3.2.1 Off Site Accidents Employees and 1. If safe, stop immediately and determine possible damage. Passengers Avoid obstructing traffic if possible. The vehicle shall be moved to a safe location as soon as possible. 2. Aid the injured and see to it that they receive medical Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date:0//25/2002 8 of is g:\wp.dtatagendeVahr\fah2002t2002 agenda reports102-89.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 attention as soon as possible. 3. If the vehicle is equipped with a radio, call the Control Center and have the Control Center call the local police. If the vehicle does not have a radio, call the police from a nearby telephone and call your supervisor. Request assistance in the investigation process if necessary. Note: A police report is needed when the accident involves the public or non-district property. If the police do not respond, the employee should obtain all pertinent information available from the other driver and the accident scene and then go to the police department with local jurisdiction to file a report. 4. Identify as many witnesses as possible and obtain their name, address, and home and work phone numbers. 5. Using the camera in the vehicle, take pictures of each vehicle involved and the road conditions. (See SAFETY- SOP-202.2) 6. Do not discuss the accident with anyone other than the police and District personnel. A. Provide only your name, agency name and address, and work telephone number. B. Obtain a business card from the police officer and ask them to record the accident case number on the card. 7. The driver, and each employee passenger, and each Supervisor employee witness should assist in completion of the Vehicle Accident Report during the shift in which the accident occurred. 8. The Safety and Health Division must be noted of the accident as soon as possible. 9. Conduct an accident investigation (at the accident scene if possible) and determine actions to prevent accident recurrence. A. The accident investigation shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-202.2, Investigating Vehicle Accidents. Rev.0 Hard Copy Is uncontrolled Date: 01/25/2002 9 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 10. Complete and sign the Vehicle Accident Report. 11. The completed and approved Vehicle Accident Report must be delivered to the Safety and Health Division and the Division Manager appropriate Division Manager before the end of the shift. If the accident occurs during evening, weekend, or holiday hours, the Vehicle Accident Report shall be distributed at the beginning of the next week day shift. 12. Determine if participation in the investigation at the scene of the accident is warranted. This decision is based on personal injury and the severity of the equipment/property damage. 13. Review and approve the Vehicle Accident Report. 14. Ensure that actions to prevent accident recurrence are completed and documented. 15. Send written verification of completion to the Safety and Safety and Health Health Division. 16. Track completed and outstanding actions to prevent accident recurrence and forward completed items to the Safety and Health Division. 17. Participate in the investigation at the scene of the accident if the accident resulted in personal injury and/or significant equipment/property damage. 18. Review the Vehicle Accident Report and determine if an additional investigation is warranted. 19. Forward copies of the Vehicle Accident Report to the Fleet Services Supervisor. 20. Distribute completed and outstanding actions and recommendations to prevent accident recurrence. 3.2.2 On Site Employee 1. Stop immediately and determine possible damage. Move the vehicle to the side of the road if possible. Avoid obstructing traffic if possible. Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date:OH252002 10 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agendaVahr\fah2o02\2002 agenda reports\02.89.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 A. Call for assistance if traffictcrowd control is required. 2. Aid the injured and see to it that they receive medical attention as soon as possible. A. Notify the Control Center who will notify the Medical Team via 222 reporting 3. Call the Control Center and have the Control Center call the Safety and Health Division. 4. Call your supervisor. Request assistance in the investigation process 'rf necessary. A. The accident investigation shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-202.2, Investigating Vehicle Accidents. 5. Identify as many witnesses as passible and obtain their name. Supervisor 6. The driver, and each employee passenger, and each employee witness should assist in completion of the Vehicle Accident Report during the shift in which the accident occurred. 7. The supervisor shall conduct an accident investigation (at the accident scene if possible) and determine actions to prevent accident recurrence. 8. The supervisor shall complete and sign the Vehicle Accident Report. 9. The completed and approved Vehicle Accident Report must Division Manager be delivered to the Safety and Health Division and the appropriate Division Manager before the end of the shift. 10. The division manager shall review and approve the Vehicle Accident Report. 11. The division manager shall ensure that actions to prevent accident recurrence are completed and documented. 12. The division manager shall send written verification of completion to the Safety and Health Division. Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date:01/25/2002 11 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 Safety and Health 13. The division manager shall track completed and outstanding actions to prevent accident recurrence and forward completed items to the Safety and Health Division. 14. The Safety and Health Division shall participate in the investigation at the scene of the accident if the accident resulted in personal injury and/or significant equipment/property damage. 15. The Safety and Health Division shall review the Vehicle Accident Report and determine if an additional investigation is warranted. 16. The Safety and Health Division shall distribute completed and outstanding actions and recommendations to prevent accident recurrence. 3.3 Near Miss Accidents 1. The employee shall notify their supervisor of a near miss accident. 2. The employee and supervisor shall conduct an investigation into the causes of the near miss accident. A. The near miss shall be documented on the accident report form. 3. The accident investigation shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-202.1. 4. The supervisor/manager may contact the Safety and Health Division for assistance with the Near Miss - Accident Investigation. 5. The near miss scene shall be preserved until the near miss accident investigation has been completed. 3.4 Safety-Health Investigation Team 1. The Safety and Health Division shall coordinate the formation of a Safety-Health Investigation Team for all Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date. 0//25/2002 12 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002QO02 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 accidents 2. The members of the Safety-Health Investigation Team shall receive training in conducting an accident investigation. A. Training shall be conducted at least biennially. 3. The Safety and Health Division shall ensure that team members have the proper equipment to conduct a thorough investigation. 4. The team shall conduct investigations on all accidents/incidents that meet the following criteria: A. Two or more injuries from the same incident. (1) District, District visitors or contractor personnel B. Property damage of more than $5,000.00 (1) District property. C. As requested by executive management. D. As requested by of legal counsel. E. As requested by the Safety and Health Supervisor for training purposes. 5. The team shall be made up of a cross section of District employees as determined by the Safety and Health Supervisor. 6. Each bargaining unit shall be represented on the team. 3.5 Employee Training 1. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for developing and implementing an Accident Investigation Process Training Program. 2. All managers and supervisors shall attend the Accident Investigation Process Training Program, A. Non-management personnel may attend Accident Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date: 0//25/2002 13 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY L-202 Investigation Process Training Program training with their supervisor's permission. 3. Training shall be conducted as an initial course and as required. 3.6 Program Administration 1. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for reviewing the Accident Investigation and Reporting Program every two years. 4. References 8 Califomia Code of Regulations, §3203. Injury and Illness Prevention Program 8 California Code of Regulations, §330, Definitions 8 California Code of Regulations, Chapter 7, Subchapter 1. Occupational Injury or Illness Reports and Records 8 California Code of Regulations Chapter 3.2. , Subchapter 2, Article 3. Reporting Work-Connected Injuries, §342. Reporting Work-Connected Fatalities and Serious Injuries. California Vehicle Code, Division 1, Section 670 SAFETY-POL-101 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-108 Contractor Safety Program SAFETY-SOP-202.1, Accidents In Which District Personnel Are Injured. SAFETY-SOP-202.2, Investigating Vehicle Accidents SAFETY-SOP-202.3, Investigating Contractor Accidents SAFETY-SOP-202.4, Safety-Health Investigation Team Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date:0/252002 14 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahnfah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc t Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-202 5. Attachments Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date: 0//25/2002 15 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahrlfah200212002 agenda reports\02-89.2.doc w FAHR COMMITTEE MeetmgDate To.Bd.ofDlr. y 10/9/02 10/23/92 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR02-90 1Me1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources and Employee Development Originator: Denise Martinez, Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND _ PROCEDURES AS AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION 98-33. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-19, amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. SUMMARY The attached policies are routine updates or additions to maintain consistent language with the Memorandums of Understanding (MOU)and/or new legislation or to explain procedures more clearly. Copies of all policies affected are attached. Additional language is highlighted in gray; deleted language is lined through. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION . Policy Number From To Reason for Change and Subject D51.00 Pro-Rata Benefits for Current Language. Revised Language. Clarification of policy. Pan-Ome Employees D60.00 Senerds Option Plan Currant Language, Delete Policy 060.00, aOPbenerd elminated. (BOP) D720.00 Professional, Technical Memberships and N/A New Policy. District practice being Fees implemented as official policy. F10.00 Rules of Conduct Current Language. Revised Language. Clarification of procedures. G:w .dtavoende�Ap .da Repo =Q MaW Agenda Rep UDONI m t<(e).HRV ... RawS :atasa Page 1 Policy Number ' and Subject From To Reason for Change ,r F41.00 Vebide Usage Policy N/A New Policy. Distract pmam being Implemented as offidal policy ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Policy D51.00 — Pro Rata Benefits for Part-time Employees 2. Policy 060.00 — Benefits Option Plan 3. Policy D120.00 — Professional and Technical Memberships and Fees 4. Policy F10.00 — Rules of Conduct 5. Policy F41.00 —Vehicle Usage 6. Resolution No. OCSD 02-19 ckmelelepenftOwC Apmm aewns�=6mrd Agenu Rep kli)QVIM 14(e).HaPdins,e« ao- .: erlwse Page 2 Orange County Policy Number: D51.00 r , - Sanitation District Effective Date: bcto d�e�T�o'f Subject: Pro Rata Benefits for Supersedes: J�Ine701f Part-Time Employees C28.00 ul! T,.,,.me Employee Rene Approved by: Lisa L. Tomko 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1. The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines for use in the administration of the benefits program provided for regular employees working in a part-time status. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1. All regular District employees working in a part-time status. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Part-time employees regularly work less than 80 hours in a biweekly pay period. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 Notwithstanding any other provision herein,the General Manager is authorized to confer the benefits set forth under the District's policies and procedures regarding leave of absence with or without pay(@WadJldgJur-y 4i6), vacations, sick leave, personal leave, holidays,tuition reimbursement, insurance, severance pay, shall apply to regular part-time employees on a prorated basis as follows: HOURS OF WORK PER WEEK PERCENT BENEFFITISUBSIDY 0— 'AdeF19 None 20—ender 29 50 percent 30-39 75 percent 4.2. Pro rate Insurance benefits mean the employee will be responsible for payment of the pro-rated amount of the insurance premium. Insurance benefits consist of: Medical,Dental,Vision, Life and Short and Long-Tenn Disability. 5.0 PROCEDURE With respect to Insurance, employees pay premiums through monthly payroll deduction, according to the chart in section 4.1. Page i of R. D 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Page 2 of 2 ,Y Policy deleted - BOP benefit eliminated. Orange County Policy Number: D60.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: October 24, 2002 Subject: BENEFITS OPTION PLAN (BOP) Supersedes: April 26, 2000 Approved by: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for administering the Benefits Option Plans(BOP). 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management Groups. 3.0 DEFINITIONS The Benefits Option Plan is a provision in the District's policies that provides employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management groups with supplemental income that can be used for a variety of purposes as specified herein. The reimbursement Period is defined as the six months prior to the month in which the BOP is to be paid out. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 It is the District's policy to allow employees in the Professional, Supervisory, Management and Executive Management groups to participate in the BOP in accordance with this policy. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Employees in the Professional, Supervisory,Management and Executive Management group who have successfully completed their probationary period are entitled to participate in the BOP. Employees must be off probation within the reimbursement period to be eligible for BOP. Under the provisions of the BOP, Professional employees will receive$1,000 annually, and Supervisors, Management and Executive Management employees will receive$1250 annually to offset the cost of professional licenses, memberships, subscriptions,tuition reimbursement and medical expenses.The Benefits Option Plan will be distributed semi-annually in January and July of each year. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 Employees who are within their initial six-month probationary period are not eligible for BOP. 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Orange County Policy Number: D120.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: October 24, 2002 -Subject: PROFESSIONALAND Supersedes: N/A TECHNICAL MEMBERSHIPS _ AND FEES Approved by: Lisa L Tomko 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This policy provides the guidelines for budgeting, approving and paying of employee membership in professional and/or technical organizations. This program encourages employees to update and maintain professional and/or technical capabilities that are pertinent and beneficial to the District. The District will pay the professional and/or technical organization membership fees associated with acquiring and maintaining District approved memberships. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all District regular,full-time employees. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Qualifying Employees: regular, full-time employees who have completed their initial probationary period. 3.2 Regular Full-time Employees: employees who regularly work an 80-hour, biweekly,full benefit pay period. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 The District shall pay for membership fees associated with acquiring and maintaining District-approved professional and/or technical associations that are deemed pertinent and beneficial to the District and employees. 5.0 REQUIREMENTS 5.1 All paid membership fees must be budgeted. 5.2 District approved city, county, state and federal technical and professional licenses, certifications and registrations are not eligible for payment through the Professional and Technical Memberships and Fees policy. These reimbursements are processed through the Certification Reimbursement Program. 6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 Budgeting Membership Fees 6.1.1 Each division shall determine if the requested membership is pertinent and beneficial to the District and employee. Page 1 of 2 6.1.2 Membership fees shall be approved and budgeted by each Department and/or division prior to payment. - 6.2 Processing Membership Fees for Payment 6.2.1 Once budgeted, a payment request voucher and photocopy of the membership invoice shall be forwarded through the General Services Administration Division to the Finance Department for direct payment. _ 6.2.1.1 The G eneral Services Administration D ivision shall screen and verify membership approval all payment request vouchers. 6.2.2 A photocopy of the membership invoice and an authorized payment request voucher is required for the Finance Department to process the payment request. 6.3 Upon non-approval, a copy of t he p ayment request voucher will b e f orwarded back to the employee with a status indicating the reason(s)for non-approval. 7.0 EXCEPTIONS None 8.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.1 Payment will be at the discretion of the District provided the employee meets the criteria specified in this policy. Page 2 of 2 Orange County Policy Number: F10.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: 09tg�P 8611e111IeF 22,4W Subject: RULES OF CONDUCT Supersedes: p*W_r'4W.v_@W Approved by: Lisa L. Tomko 1.0 PURPOSE - 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines regarding rules of conduct for employees. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all employees regardless of their organizational unit. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 4.0 POLICY 4.1 Reasonable rules of conduct are necessary for the safety and protection of all employees and to ensure the efficient and productive operation of District's facilities. Such rules are established with the goal of achieving mutual understanding with all employees regarding unacceptable behavior, and should be fairly and equitably administered by all supervisors and managers. 5.0 PROCEDURE but FatheF to provid a�HaA seasequeases. 5.1 The`#ofigyyirjg tarts gre_@iimRl�qf:I§p'j@cce, n,�`lct�rb6hysoF_ 1'An employee who acts in an irresponsible manner with regard to one of the following areas may be subject to discipline, up to and including termination, after consideration of the employee's past performance, prior discipline, longevity and work history. 5.1.1 Coming to work in a timely manner and not abusing time-off privileges. 5.1.2 Proper completion of individual time records in accordance with established procedures. 5.1.3 Proper notification of supervisors in the event of intended absence or tardiness. 5.1.4 Careful and considerate use of District property. 5.1.5 Observance of all safety aj5,d oy(illj,rules and regulations. 5.1.6 tiMM041e4;cC u};4 tcwa' otgF1'D tnc[gmP_ l 5.1.7 A_baencemd a6 lwc s-.o,'omtr a Puri yTsa a _d. lyy�on�.s4c;7ry na to:a. : 5.1.8 ;CdheWeeSo;gpPhrai;ilejVgarrghdum(ALin—jgrs$itIling_apd Dfstri_cl OLip s„3_f prasdurea� 5.1.9 �Safg'"9ua.[diF�9Eyn'�3a"(l6a'i�j{fj�jion�'1sTn "`�S.r"Q_.ieCg'pi�7iF�emPl'�"`�'po�len_t�, - 5.1.10 Appropriate correction of unacceptable job performance or practices. Page I oft 5.2With FegaFd to one of the following weaS Maybe TCe folln9�te�m5 aSee>S`ample$O�'ipAduU.or tle - �'� —_�'^ —'—'_ irgyior wh f��ysuLeetjan�e�ge An anbjest to disa+issal teririi=t regard to the employee's past performance,prior discipline, V longevity and work history. 5.2.1 %— q&jqAjJjW charges of Sexual Harassment aresubstant aced. 5.2.2 Fighting or any violent act endangering the safety of others. 5.2.3 Making false, profane, abusive or malicious statements concerning any employee or officer of the District. 5.2.4 Accepting gifts or favors of more than token value from anyone doing or seeking to do business with the District. 5.2.5 Engaging in any activity which represents a violation of the District's conflict of interest code. 5.2.6 Intentional falsification of any District records. 5.2.7 Unauthorized removal of District's or others'property. 5.2.8 Defacing, destroying or damaging District property or the property of others. 5.2.9 Possession of weapons or explosives on District premises. 5.2.10 Violation of substance abuse policy. 5.2.11 Immoral or indecent conduct, or insubordination,which is defined as refusal or failure to follow the lawful directive of a supervisor or manager or to comply with an established policy or procedure. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 The, . . ples of eoridttct O<llehavT" m llii's.pdrry slw7'kliot be donstdered eT n'"xiaygp Ilst<' .. nce o keu�mPle"sf._� �I%cta[�enavlorfrom tna,po8c ynu neiMe bests f avoiding dlscipif to p fiBlmileniflry¢hen Duct firfd_sttlat suiit.an�cnolt..is w9p3f tLeA; 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS Page 2 of 2 Orange County Policy Number: F41.00 Sanitation District Effective Date: October 24, 2002 Subject: Vehicle Usage Policy Supersedes: N/A Approved by: Lisa L. Tomko 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform guidelines and procedures for the administration, utilization of, and disposition of District's vehicles. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS AFFECTED 2.1 This policy applies to all regular employees regardless of their organizational unit. 3.0 DEFINITIONS District's Vehicles are all District-owned cars,trucks,or specialized equipment. Reaular Employees are employees are those employees who regularly work on a year-round basis,for an indefinite period of time Regular employees may be full-time or part-time. Business Guests are persons that are accompanied by District staff for the purpose of conducting business with the District. Standby is time during which an employee is not required to be at the work location or at the employee's residence but is required to be available and ready for immediate return to work. 4.0 POLICY 4.1 Vehicle Assignments 4.1.1 District vehicles and equipment are assigned to departments depending on their need for such vehicle(s) and/or equipment to accomplish their mission. Division supervision shall designate or assign drivers or operators to specific vehicle(s)for conducting District business during working hours only. 4.1.2 Pool vehicles are assigned to,and managed by,the Fleet Services Division for the purpose of providing temporary assigned vehicles for District business. 4.1.3 District vehicles and equipment shall not be loaned to contractors,other agencies,cities,or other organizations or companies. 4.2 Use of Personal Vehicles for District Business 4.2.1 The use of private vehicles to conduct District business shall be reimbursed at the District rate not to exceed the prevailing rate allowed by the Internal Revenue Service. 4.2.2 The employee's private vehicle insurance is the primary insurance on the vehicle.The District shall not be responsible for the replacement, or repair of any private vehicle, not otherwise owned,rented,or leased by the District and used to conduct District business,If said vehicle is damaged or destroyed during the course of such use. Prior to said use,the employee's private vehicle shall have automobile insurance coverage that meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the DMV for public liability and property damage. Page 1 of 6 4.3 Use of Pool Vehicles 4.3.1 Pool vehicles are maintained by the Fleet Services Division for: 4.3.1.1 Use by any authorized employee requiring transportation to conduct District business on a trip by trip basis. 4.3.1.2 Use by any authorized employee while their regularly assigned vehicle or mobile equipment is undergoing service or repairs. 4.3.1.3 Temporary use by any department/division as required for performing its mission. 4.3.2 Pool vehicles should not be used for extended out-of-town business unless all other options, least costly to the District, have been considered and eliminated. 4.3.3 Pool vehicles may be reserved in advance on a first come first serve basis by contacting the appropriate pool vehicle personnel. 4.3.4 Overnight use of a District pool vehicle must have prior approval by a District manager level or above. The manager should consider all options(i.e.,using personal vehicle instead)and shall choose the option that is the least costly to the District. An employee whose District business requires an early morning departure will be allowed to checkout the vehicle the night prior to the travel day. 4.3.5 Drivers should avoid parking pool vehicles overnight in a public parking facility such as an airport. Costs for airport shuttles, public transportation, or personal vehicle use shall be reimbursed as part of the employees travel expense. 4.3.6 District vanpool vehicles are limited to the approved route and schedule as assigned by the vanpool coordinator. Vanpool vehicles may be used for other District purposes during working hours. 4.3.7 Vanpoolers and carpoolers may check out a pool vehicle in the event of an emergency that requires their immediate departure from work. An emergency shall be defined as,and only as, illness or injury of the car-pooler, carpool driver, or car-pooler's immediate family member, or unscheduled overtime requested by the employee's immediate supervisor resulting in the car-pooler missing the vanpool or carpool departure time. 4.3.8 Returned pool vehicle shall be refueled when less than one-half tank of fuel remains. All trash and personal items must be removed from the pool vehicle. Any mechanical problems shall be reported immediately. - 4.4 District Vehicle Parking 4.4.1 District vehicles shall be parked and locked in their assigned parking spaces or designated areas. 4.4.2 District vehicle's keys are to remain in a secured area. 4.4.3 District vehicles shall not be parked in visitor, carpool, vanpool, or handicapped parking spaces. 4.4.4 Employees with a Disabled Persons Parking Permit issued by the DMV shall be authorized to use handicapped parking spaces for their assigned District vehicle. _ 4.4.5 On call employees who take District vehicles home shall park the District vehicle in agarage, carport, or driveway and not on a private or public street. Page 2 of 6 4.5 Employee Personal Vehicle Parking 4.5.1 Personal vehicles shall be parked in employee parking areas only. 4.5.2 Personal vehicles shall not park in visitor or assigned parking spaces. 4.6 Driver Responsibility 4.6.1 License: While operating a District vehicle, or driving a personal vehicle, on District business,the driver must possess a valid State of California,Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Driver's License, and shall comply with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and local regulations and ordinances. Drivers required to operate a commercial vehicle must possess a valid State of California,DMV Commercial Driver's License with the proper endorsements. 4.6.2 Private Use 4.6.2.1 District vehicles shall be used only for purposes of District business and not for personal business or pleasure by any person whomsoever. No one except authorized employees and their business guests may be transported in a District vehicle at anytime. 4.6.2.2 The transportation of personal property with a District vehicle is prohibited at all times,including while the employee is on authorized On-Call duty. The exceptions include an employee's lunch, gym bag, or property which Is ordinarily used by the employee while they are on District business. 4.6.3 Care of Vehicles: Each employee having custody of a District vehicle shall exercise due caution and prudence in the operation of such vehicle and shall minimize the risk of damage to such vehicle.The only District related stickers are authorized on District vehicles. 4.6.4 Smoking:Smoking is not permitted in District owned vehicles. 4.6.5 Cell phones: The use of cell phones and other communications devices is highly discouraged unless it is business related. 4.6.6 Vehicles not In Use: District vehicles are for use during working hours only. Said vehicles shall otherwise be parked and locked at assigned District facilities. District vehicle keys shall remain in a secured area. Keys for vehicles assigned to individuals may be kept overnight or during the weekend by the individual. They are to make that vehicle available to their assigned department by leaving the keys at their work station if they are to be gone for any extended period of time. 4.6.7 Standby Use: District vehicles may be taken home by those employees on paid stand-by duty during the period of such stand-by duty. If possible,the vehicle shall be parked in a garage,carport,or driveway and not on a private or public street. Vehicles shall only be used for the express purpose of responding to call outs and not for personal purposes. 4.6.7.1 With the permission of the employee's manager, employees may use assigned District vehicles in lieu of their personal vehicles for transportation to placeslevents to facilitate their availability during their authorized On-Call duty. However, District vehicles may not be parked at or near bars, casinos, adult entertainment establishments or other locations likely to reflect poorly on the District. 4.6.8 Loss of Drivers License:Drivers of District vehicles are required to notify their supervisor,in writing, immediately upon return to work of receiving the following: Page 3 of 6 4.6.8.1 If their driver's license is revoked,suspended,or expired. , 4.6.8.2 If they are cited for a major moving violation, to include but not limited to the following: 4.6.8.2.1 Driving under the influence of alcohol,drugs or a combination of both. 4.6.8.2.2 Hit and run. 4.6.8.2.3 Reckless driving. 4.6.8.2.4 Leaving the scene of an accident. 4.6.8.2.5 Eluding or fleeing a police officer. 4.6.8.2.6 Speed contests or drag racing. 4.6.9 Passengers: Only District employees and their business guests are allowed as passengers in District vehicles. Nofamilymembers or hitchhikers are permitted. Drivers and passengers shall use seat belts and shoulder restraints at all times while the vehicle is in motion.No driver shall allow or cause any passenger to ride in or on any vehicle other than in a proper passenger seal equipped with legal seat belts. 4.7 Safe Driving Habits and Vehicle Safety Practices 4.7.1 District vehicles shall be operated in compliance with all applicable state and local laws and ordinances. 4.7.2 Drivers are to drive defensively and maintain control of the vehicle at all times and be aware of their personal limitations, road conditions,weather, visibility, and traffic. 4.7.3 No driver shall exceed a greater speed than is reasonable and prudent,having due regard for the traffic on,and the surface and width of,the highway. In no event shall a driver maintain a speed which exceeds posted speed limits or endangers the safety of persons or property. 4.7.4 No person will operate a District vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs. Also, over-the-counter or prescription medications that are known to the employee to adversely influence the safe operation of a vehicle are prohibited. 4.7.5 In inclement weather, min, fog,etc.,drivers are required to turn on vehicle headlights. 4.7.6 Drivers are responsible for the secure placement and proportionate distribution therein of the load to be transported. Whenever the load extends beyond the bed or body of such vehicles, the driver will use clearance flags or signs,properly displayed,indicating a long or wide load. as required by DMV Vehicle Code. 4.7.7 Drivers are responsible to ensure that vehicles are not overloaded. 4.7.8 Whenever it is necessary to hook up a trailer to a truck,caution should be exercised and,if needed, the assistance of a fellow employee shall be obtained. 4.8 Accident Reports 4.8.1 The District requires employees to report a wide variety of incidents ranging from loss of District property to injuries. All job related incidents or any incident involving District property is to be reported no matter how slight. This Policy requires drivers and/or operators of vehicles and equipment to complete a Vehicle Accident Report in the event of a vehicle accident, vehicle damage, vehicle theft, vehicle vandalism, property damage, and other Page 4 of 6 • vehicle related incidents. Vehicle Accident Reports must be turned in to your immediate supervisor during the shift in which the accident occurred.The drug testing requirement as described in the OCSD Substance Abuse Policy shall apply. 4.9 Vehicle Accident Reporting 4.9.1 The District has established policies regarding safe driving.habits to help protect all people from the emotional trauma and economic effect of automobile accidents. Accidents are always a serious matter and must be reported as soon as possible. Vehicle accidents as defined in this document are an incident involving a District vehicle that results in damage, regardless of how minor. If you are involved in an accident on a public road, immediately notify the California Highway Patrol or appropriate law enforcement agency State the following information: 4.9.1.1.1 Exact location of accident. 4.9.1.1.2 Number of injured parties. 4.9.1.1.3 Number of vehicles involved. 4.9.1.1.4 Indicate if accident is blocking traffic. 4.9.1.1.5 Standby for confirmation. 4.9.2 For injuries incurred to District employees and/or passengers,regardless of injury severity, the following shall apply. 4.9.2.1 Serious Injuries-Request immediate medical attention by contacting 911. 4.9.2.2 For Injuries Other than Serious-Based on the severity of injury,contact the District, or transfer injured employee directly to Edinger Medical Center for treatment. Employees who have on file with Safety&Health an employee's Choice of Physician for Industrial Injury form,are authorized to use their own personal physician. 4.9.3 Secure the accident scene if you are in the traveled portion of the roadway with traffic cones. Flares maybe used ONLY if Fluids ARE NOT leaking from vehicle. Do not leave a scene of an accident until cleared by the investigating traffic officer. 4.9.4 Do not make any statements that may be taken as an admission of negligence or fault relative to the accident. 4.9.5 Obtain the following information from the other driver(s): 4.9.5.1 Name,address, and telephone number of driver and owner of vehicle. 4.9.5.2 Drivers license number(verify address). 4.9.5.3 Description of other vehicle(s) and license plate number(s). Describe damage of vehicle(s). 4.9.5.4 Name,address,telephone number,and policy number of their insurance company. 4.9.5.5 Obtain names,addresses,and telephone numbers of any witnesses of the accident. 4.9.5.6 Take photographs of the accident scene if you or another employee has access to a camera. 4.9.5.7 As soon as possible following an accident involving a commercial motor vehicle the District will test for alcohol and controlled substances for each driver. Page 5 of 6 4.9.5.8 Follow up with the written Vehicle Accident Report during the shift in which the accident occurred and submit it to your immediate supervisor. 4.10 Responsibility Assignments 4.10.1 Employees - 4.10.1.1 Employees are responsible for compliance with all provisions of this policy when using District or private vehicles to conduct District business. For purposes of this policy the actual driver and/or operator of the vehicle or equipment sfiall be the responsible employee. 4.10.2 Directors, Managers,and Supervisors 4.10.2.11t is the responsibility of supervisory personnel to ensure the policies of this document are understood by the employees under his or her immediate supervision. 6.0 EXCEPTIONS 6.1 None 7.0 PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 None 8.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 8.1 Policy F40.00, Use of District Property Page 6 of 6 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-19 _ AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING THE HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND - PROCEDURES The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That Exhibit"A"of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. D51.00, Pro-Rats Benefits for Part-time Employees, set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: That Exhibit"A"of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by deleting Policy No. D60.00, Benefits Option Plan, set forth in Attachment No. 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: That Exhibit"A"of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by adding Policy No. D120.00, Professional and Technical Memberships and Fees, set forth in Attachment No. 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4: That Exhibit"A" of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. F10.00, Rules of Conduct, set forth in Attachment No. 4, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 5: That Exhibit"A"of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by adding Policy No. F41.00, Vehicle Usage Policy, set forth in Attachment No. 5, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 6: That all other terns and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be made by Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 23, 2002. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary G:lwpAtategendalBoard Agenda Repods12002 Board Agenda ReportsMONtem 14(e).BdIm f FAHRCOMMITTEE 144:ngDate TOBd.UrDir. larogro2 lo/27ro2 AGENDA REPORT I'" NUMDU PAHR02-91 14(F) - Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF DISTRICT'S OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICT'S EXISTING CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE OF,AND IN ANTICIPATION OF, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES, FROM PROCEEDS OF FUTURE LONG-TERM BORROWING GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-_, Declaration of Official Intent to Reimburse Certain of the District's Capital Reserve Funds for Expenditures Made in Advance for FY 2002-03 Capital Improvement Projects from Proceeds of a Future Long-Term Financing. SUMMARY Adoption of the"Reimbursement Resolution"will allow the District to use proceeds from a future long-term borrowing to reimburse capital reserve funds which were used to fund District capital projects. A similar Resolution has been adopted each of the past several years. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: j ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This Rem has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Under provisions of U.S. Treasury Regulation 1.150-2, local public agencies may use proceeds from long-term borrowings to reimburse those capital reserve funds which were advanced to fund preliminary expenditures, such as design, engineering and similar costs, for capital projects. The Regulations permit up to 20% of the aggregate par amount of bond proceeds from a new issue to be used for reimbursement of preliminary project expenditures, providing the public agency has declared its intent to do so prior to debt issuance. e As part of preparations for a new capital financing program to support the Strategic Plan Update Capital Improvement Program, it is necessary to update the District's intent to reimburse reserve funds. Adoption of the attached "Reimbursement Resolution"will ensure that the District can include monies in upcoming borrowings to reimburse reserve funds for expenditures made in advance of available COP proceeds. The Board of Directors has adopted similar Resolutions in 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001. In 2000-01, a $35 million COP issue recovered funds previously used for the - capital improvement program. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. OCSD 02- GGS:Ic GW dM�N drape Pep Ss 2B Mng Rep IIWNIa I<III�PWIlie Fw fi eoc w.,ud: vmui Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-20 DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN OF THE DISTRICT'S CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE LONG-TERM FINANCING A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AUTHORIZING FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TO BE REIMBURSED FROM FUTURE LONG-TERM FINANCING WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, by adoption of Resolution No. 94-81 on July 13, 1994; Resolution No. 97-28 on July 30, 1997; Resolution No. OCSD 98-32 on July 1, 1998; Resolution No. OCSD 99-08 on June 23, 1999; Resolution No. 00-15 on July 19, 2000, and Resolution No. OCSD 01-17 on August 22, 2001, previously declared its official intent to reimburse its then existing capital reserve funds and accounts for certain expenditures made in advance of and in anticipation of issuing indebtedness for capital improvements to be acquired, constructed, or paid for, by or on behalf of the District during the Fiscal Year; and, WHEREAS, the District ("Issuer") intends to acquire and/or construct, or otherwise improve, certain capital improvements during Fiscal Year 2002-03, and later, all as more particularly described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Project"); and, WHEREAS, Issuer expects to pay certain expenditures (the "Reimbursement Expenditures") in connection with the Project prior to the issuance of indebtedness for the purpose of financing costs associated with the Project, on a long-term basis; and, WHEREAS, the Issuer reasonably expects that the debt obligations, in an amount not to exceed $300 million, will be issued, and that certain of the proceeds of such debt obligations will be used to reimburse the Issuer for Reimbursement Expenditures. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: 1 Section 1: That the Issuer finds and determines that the foregoing Recitals are true and correct. - Section 2: That this Declaration is made solely for purposes of establishing compliance with the requirements of Section 1.150-2 of the U.S. Treasury Regulations. This Resolution Declaration does not bind the Issuer to make any expenditure, incur any indebtedness, or proceed with the Project. Section 3: That the Issuer hereby declares its official intent to use proceeds of indebtedness to reimburse itself for the Reimbursement Expenditures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held October 23, 2002. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary AHMFah200Z 2 Exhibit A Pape t a e Orange County Sanitation District W Capital Improvement Program - Project Total 2002-03 Project Phase Project Project Cashllow Number 711/02 Status Budget Budget Collections Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. 01-17 Planning Continuing 7,494,000 Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump Sm.Abandonment 02-24-1 Design Revised 3,584,000 343,000 Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Prot. 0241 Design Revised 86,747.000 821,000 Abandonment of the existing SARI in SA River 02.41-01 Design New 8,456,000 Replacement Of Miller Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon 03-2.1 Const./Impl. Revised 1,619,000 161,000 Orange-Westem Subtmnk Relief Sewer 03.25 Const./Impl. Revised 1,596,000 119,000 Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer 03-35-112 Planning Revised 26.667,000 1,180,000 Rehabilitation of the Seal Beach Pump Station 03-51 Design Revised 3,645,000 175,000 Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Station 03-52 Design Revised 1,803,000 193,000 Lining of 36"NPTB FM(June. Box to 2nd Angle PQ 05-19-R4 Design Continuing 1,959,000 1,959,000 Relocation of Lido Pump Station 0541-1 Const./Impl. Revised 3,686,000 139,000 Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 0543-01 Planning New 3.435,000 103,oD0 Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Replacement 05-43-02 Design New 810.000 96,000 Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer 05-46 Const./Impl. Revised 7,264,000 464,000 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station 05-49 Design Revised 4,882,000 392,000 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 05-50 Design Revised 5,775,000 1,165,000 Rehabilitation of the 14th Street Pump Station O1"1 Design Revised 4,493.000 374.000 Rehabilitation of the"A"Street Pump Station 05-52 Design Revised 4,596.000 858,000 Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station 05-53 Design Revised 1,816,000 350.000 Rehabilitation of the Crystal Cove Pump Station 05-54 Design Revised 933,000 158,000 Abend.of AB Trunk,Watson and Cal. Sewers 06-13 Const./Impl. Revised 384,000 95.000 Abandonment of Alrbase Trunk Sewers-Watson St 06-13.1 Const./Impl. New 1,200,000 651.000 Abandonment of Airbass Trunk Sewers-Arlington Or 06.13-2 Const./Impl. New 1,130,000 546,000 Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-California St 06.13-3 Const./Impl. New 1,068.000 3,000 Newland Street Interceptor Sewer Protection 11-14-R Design New 144,000 144.000 Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 11-22 Const./Impl. Revised 7,026,000 1,319,000 Pacific Coast Hwy. Boat Yard and HB sewer abandon. 11-23-1 Design Revised 378,000 378,000 Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Station 11-28 Design Revised 1,817,000 252.000 Facilities Engineering Projects-Collections FE-Collect Planning Continuing 5.400,000 300,000 Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation I-24 Const./Impl. Revised 38,984,000 7,505,000 Collections Total 238,791,000 20,243,000 Exhibit A _ Page 2 of 6 Orange County Sanitation District Capital Improvement Program - 14 Project Total 2002-03 Project Phase Project Project Castiflow Number 711/02 Status Budget Budget Revenue Area 7 Covey Lane Pump Station Abandonment 07-14-04 Design Revised 100,000 91,000 Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 07-21 Design Continuing 5,395,000 20,000 Lemon Heights Subtiunk Street Rehabilitation 07-22-1 Design New 503,000 270,000 College Ave.Pump Station Parallel Force Main 07-23-1 Design Continuing 1,890,000 349,000 Gisler Red Hill Trunk Sewer Relocation-Phase 1 07-32-1 Planning New 800,000 662,000 Gisler-Radhill Trunk Improvements, Reach"A" 07-36 Design Revised 7,832,000 1,573,000 Gisler-Redhill System Improvements, Reach B 07-37 Design Revised 4,986,000 858,000 Tustin Trunk Improvements 07-38 Design Continuing 3,662,000 53,000 Orange Trunk Improvements 07-39 Design Revised 5,840,000 1,214,000 West Trunk improvements 07-40 Design Continuing 497,000 13,000 Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements 07-41 Design Revised 16,316,000 3,067,000 Replacement of the College Ave.Pump Station 07-47 Planning Revised 4,512,000 176,000 Rehabilitation of the MacArthur Pump Station 07-49 Design Revised 1,651,000 62,000 Rehabilitation of the Michelson Pump Station 07-50 Design Revised 918,000 30.000 Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station 07-7-2 Design Continuing 446,000 446,000 Revenue Area 7 Total 55,348,000 8,894,000 Total Collections System 294,139,000 29,127,000 Collections Facilities Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 01-98 Const./lmpl. Continuing 1,709,000 768,000 Replacement of the Ellis Ave. Pump Sin 1-10 Planning Revised 27,100,000 1,400,000 Collections Facilities Total 28,809,000 2,168,000 Headworks Grit Auger Replacement J-52 Const./Impl. Revised 1,131,000 56.000 PLC Programming and Integration J-83 Planning New 500.000 496,000 Sunflower Drive Replacement Pl-62 Const./Impl. Revised 758,000 177,000 Headworks Rehabilitation/Refurbishment P1-71 Planning Continuing 11,346,000 75,000 Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2 P2-66 Design Continuing 160,130,000 4,980,000 Headworks Total 173,865,000 5,784,000 Exhibit A Page 3 of 6 Orange County Sanitation District W Capital Improvement Program Project Total 2002-03 Project Phase Project Project Cashflow Number 7/1102 Status Budget Budget Primary Treatment Facilities Modifications for Odor Control J-71-2 Const.Ampl. Revised 792,000 307,000 Pd.Clarifiers 16-31 &Related Facilities P1J7 Const.Ampl. Revised 89.947,000 30,549,000 Primary Treatment Rehab/Refum P2-80 Design Continuing 11,904,000 20,000 Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement/Upgrade P2-85 Const./Impl. Continuing 3,103,000 271,000 Sludge Density Meter Upgrades SP-70 Planning Continuing 800,000 403,000 Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation SP-73 ConsLAmpl. Continuing 364,000 205.000 Primary Treatment Total 106,910,000 31,755,000 Secondary Treatment Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers P1-76 Design Revised 50,0D0,000 900,000 Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation Pl-82 Design Revised 12,850,000 - Sec.Treat.Monitoring&Cntri Sys. Upgrade P2-47-3 Design Confinuing 6,917,000 369,000 Secondary Plant Rehabilitation P2-74 Planning Continuing 7,443,000 60,000 Oxygen Plant Replacement/Rehabiltation Assessment SP-72 Planning Revised 262,000 190,000 Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study SP-74 Planning Continuing 950,000 500,000 AS Clarifier Equipment Replacement SP-80 Design Continuing 450,000 370,000 Computer Modelling of Activated Sludge System SP-91 Planning New 120,000 85,000 Secondary Treatment Total 78,992,000 2,474,000 Solids Handling&Digestion Dewatering Belt Press Rebuild Pt-79 Const./Impl. Continuing 528,000 103.000 New Belt Filtrate Clarifier PI.80 Planning Continuing 1,325,000 47,000 Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No.2 P2-39 Const./Impl. Revised 14.654,000 271,000 Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility P2-60 Const./Impl. Revised 14.460.000 3.514.000 Digestion&Dewatering Rehab./Refurbishment P2.81 Planning Continuing 10,490,000 56.000 High Rate Digester Mix Pumps Mech.•Seals SP-30-2 ConstAmpl. Continuing 517,000 72,000 Dewatering Belt Press Rebuild SP-37 Const./Impl. Confinuing 824,000 126,000 Sludge Grinder Replacement SP-76 Conal.11mpl. Continuing 224,000 25,000 Design/Install Ultrasonic Sludge Treatment Process SP-87 Planning Continuing 2,600,000 732,000 Solids Handling& Digestion Total 45,612,000 4,948,000 Exhibit A Page W e , Orange County Sanitation District Capital Improvement Program - V Project Total 2002-03 Project Phase Project Project Cashflow Number 711IO2 Status Budget Budget Ocean Outfall Systems Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls J-39 Const./Impl. Revised 7,527,000 5,746,000 Outlet Flow Meter Replacement J-66 Const./Impl. Revised 1,896,000 428,000 Peak Flow Management J-67 Design Revised 10.815,000 808,000 Effluent Pumping Station Annex J-77 Design Revised 50,827,000 2,506,000 Short Term Outfall Bacteria Reduction J-87 Design Continuing 5,250.000 4,800,000 HIS Shoreline Contamination Investigation Phase III SP-84 ConsL/Impl. Revised 5,227,000 - NPDES Permit Renewal SP-88 Planning Revised 1,512,000 1,175,000 Ocean Outfall Systems Total 83,054,000 15,463,000 Utility Systems Electrical Power System Studies J-25-4 Design Continuing 3,216,000 922,000 Standby Power and Reliability Modifications J-33-1A Const./Impl. Revised 16,237,000 4,161,000 Cable Tray Improvements at Plants 1 &2 J-47 Design Continuing 26,790,000 458,000 Central Generation Automation J-79 Design Continuing 2,964,000 2,638,000 Plant 1 66kV Substation P1-97 Design New 4,315.000 150,000 Gas Compressor Addition at Plant No.2 P2-79 Design Revised 2,555,000 392,000 Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment P2-82 Design Revised 4,756,000 868,000 Fuel Station Replacement at Plant No.2 P2-87 Planning New 426,000 324,000 Electrical Equipment Refurbishment and Protection SP-81 Planning New 1,567,000 89,000 Phone system upgrade Plants 1 &2 SP-82 Const./Impl. New 199,000 199,00O Rehabilitation of Low Pressure Gas Holder SP-92 Const./Impl. New 422,000 422,000 Indoor/Outdoor Lighting Study SP-93 Planning New 137,000 137,000 Plant 1 Plant Water VFD Replacement SP-94 Const./Impl. New 730,000 730,000 Utility Systems Total 64,314,000 11,490,000 Odor Control Related Projects Facilities Modifications for Odor Control J-71-1 Const./Impl. Revised 301,000 63,000 Facilities Modifications for Odor Control J-71-3 Design Revised 2,909,000 1,047,000 Scrubber Monitor and Control Project J-71-7 Const./Impl. Continuing 2,382,000 224,000 Rehabiltiation of Odor Control Facilities J-71-8 Design Continuing 29,200,O00 200,000 Chemical Facility Mods.at Plant No. 1 P146-2 Const.Ampl. Continuing 4,536,ODO 82,000 Odor Control Related Projects Total 39,328,000 1,616,000 i Exhibit A Page 5 or e Orange County Sanitation District Capital Improvement Program - Project Total 2002-03 Project Phase Project Project CashOow, Number 7/1102 Status Budget Budget Plant Automation&Computerization Power Monitoring and Control Systems J-33.3 Planning Continuing 3,728.000 - Plant Reinvention/Automation Project J42 Design Continuing 25,760,000 2,088,000 Document Management SP-01 Planning Continuing 864,000 10.000 Data Integration SP-02 Design Continuing 4,334,000 306,000 Strategic Information Architecture (SIA) SP-03 Planning Continuing 724,000 70,000 CMMS Programming SP-04 Const./Impl. Continuing 490,000 62,000 Intranet Application Development SP-05 Design Continuing 300,000 98,000 Voice-Data Building Rewiring SP-07 Const./Impl. Continuing 109,000 50,000 Internet E-mail Browsing(Website) SP-09 Cont./Impl. Revised 370,000 155,000 Source Control Programming SP-13 Const./Impl. Continuing 1,104,000 367,000 Geographic Information System SPA Planning Continuing 4,157,000 45,000 Field Fiber Optic Upgrades SP-32 Const./Impl. Continuing 229,000 50,000 SCADA Communications-Ethernet Study SP41 Planning New 158,000 147,000 SCADA Graphics Tagging Update SP-62 Const./Impl. Continuing 425,000 185,000 FIS Upgrade SP-64 Const./Impl. Continuing 2,225,0D0 1.408,000 Information Technology Disaster Recovery SP-65 Planning Continuing 332,000 302,000 Network Equipment upgrade SP-09 Const./Impl. New 2,910,000 1,159,000 Plant Automation&Computerisation Total 48,219,000 6,502,000 Process Related Special Projects Effluent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives Plan J40.6 Planning Revised 650.000 280,000 Standard Specifications Revisions and Updates J44R Const./Impl. Continuing 200,000 14,000 Plant O&M Manual&SOP Project-Phase I SP.53 Planning Continuing 4.000,000 580,000 Hazardous Energy Control Procedures SP-54 ConsL/Impl. Continuing 1,190,000 380.000 Asset Management Program SP-68 Planning Revised 1,027,000 967,000 Corrosion Management SP-68-1 Design New 313,000 287,000 Special Projects SP-90 Const./Impl. Continuing 11,515.000 Process Related Special Projects Total 18,895,000 2,608.000 Exhibit A Page 6 or 6 7 Orange County Sanitation District Capital Improvement Program Project Total 2002-03 Project Phase ProJect Project Cashlrow Number 7/1/02 status Budget Budget Miscellaneous&Support Projects Continuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 01.96 Planning Continuing 451.000 451,000 Facilities Engineering Projects-Joint FEJ Planning Continuing 18,200.000 900,000 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 1 FE-P1 Planning Continuing 18,200.000 900,000 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 2 FE-P2 Planning Continuing 18.200,000 900,000 Interim Fac Record&Eng Data Syst Maint Services J-25-6 Design Revised 628,000 210.000 Area Classifica0on Studies J-35 ConstAmpl. Continuing 29,345,000 6,623,000 Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR J-40-5 Planning Revised 432,000 308,000 Lang Range Biosolids Management Plan J40-7 Planning Revised 492,000 222,000 Strategic Plan Update J40-9 Planning New 3,418,000 106,000 Modifications to Existing Mach. Systems J-62 Design Continuing 2,694,0D0 388,0D0 HVAC Equip. Replacement at Plants No. 1 and 2 J-80 ConstJlmpl. Revised 1,316,000 80,000 Space Allocation and Interior Renovation J-84 Planning Revised 12,974,000 336,000 Laboratory Rehabilitation J-88 Planning New 1.033,000 6,000 Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop J-89 Planning New 321,000 7,00D Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No.2 P2-84 Planning Continuing 810,000 535,000 Security System Improvements SP-W ConstAmpl. Revised 1,100,000 400,000 Small Cap. Equip. Replacement Project SP34 Const./Impl. Revised 3,000,000 500,000 Warehouse Reinvention Project SP-77 CWst./Impl. Continuing 600,000 296,000 Process Safety Management Compliance Program SP-78 Const/Impl. Continuing 60.000 60,000 Plume Modeling SP-85 Const./Impl. Revised 242,000 121,000 O&M Library Flooding&Shelving SP-86 Design New 144.000 64,000 Miscellaneous&Support Projects Total 113,660,000 13,413,000 Water Management Projects Groundwater Replenishment System J36 Design Revised 201,206,000 15,540,000 Water Conservation J-72 Planning Continuing 4.644,000 504,000 Co-op Projects, Inflow8nfilt Reduction J-73 Planning Continuing 142,676.000 6,181,000 Long Term Permanent Monitoring Program J-73-2 Planning Continuing 7.074.000 839.000 Water Management Projects Total 355,600.000 23,064,000 Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 1,157,258,000 121,183,000 Total Collection,Treatment and Disposal Projects 1,451,397,000 150,310,000 I FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 8d.of Dir. 10/09ro2 10/23/02 AGENDA REPORT IteM Nun1bW I 1on NUMbaf FAHR02-92 1 14(g) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Originator. Sonja Wassgren SUBJECT: CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ASCERTAINMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Establish a budget of$200,000 for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment, Specification No. CS-2002-112BD; and 2. Authorize the General Manager to solicit bids and subsequently award a Consultant Services Agreement for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment, Specification No. CS-2002-112BD, in an amount not to exceed $200,000. SUMMARY OCSD is soliciting proposals for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment. The goal is: to determine the needs and expectations of the community in order to establish a strategic plan that will increase public awareness and stakeholder involvement-strenothening the methods of communication between the stakeholders and the board. Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has experienced a tumultuous few years with intensive public and media attention. This attention has radically changed the way the district must communicate with all of its stakeholders. The proliferation of the Internet as a method for conveying information has forever altered the relationship between public agencies and those they serve. It has forever altered the way public agendas and policies are set. In order for the citizenry to participate fully in setting the agenda, the public must have an understanding of the role and responsibilities of public agencies such as OCSD. Unfortunately, the realization is the public does not know who OCSD is, what we do and what their role is in the process. OCSD must develop a strategic communications plan through research and stakeholder group meetings to help it become more attune to the needs of the community, ascertain what the community expects from the district and to increase public awareness and involvement from a minority of residents in our service area to a majority. Page 1 The amount was not budgeted. It is new expenditure made necessary by the public policy shift made by the Board of Directors on July 17, 2002 authorizing full secondary treatment, the change of our charter to include urban runoff, biosolids management and treatment issues and capital improvement budget. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY CONTRACT AMOUNT: Not to exceed $200,000 CONTRACT TIME PERIOD: No more than 6 months. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES Do nothing and continue with the current outreach plan. ATTACHMENTS Request for Proposals: Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment Page 2 Request for Proposals Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment aty SRNIT4TKO 44 < 9 O 9arEcl/N� THE EHV�P4��W2 Orange County Sanitation District October 2001 ` Orange County Sanitation Disbict _ October,2002 - - PROPOSAL FOR COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ASCERTAINMENT: PLAN FOR STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT IN OCSD'S FUTURE Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has experienced a tumultuous few years with intensive public and media attention. This attention has radically changed the way the district must communicate with all of its stakeholders. The proliferation of the Internet as a method for conveying information has forever altered the relationship between public _ agencies and those they serve. At the same time, the lack of trust about public institutions and corporate America has reached a dangerous new level. The painful realization is the public does not know who OCSD is, what we do and what their role is in the process. The Orange County Sanitation District, as a public agency, must develop a strategic communications plan to help it become more attune to the needs of the community, ascertain what the community expects from the district and to increase public awareness and involvement from a minority of residents in our service area to a majority. In response, OCSD is soliciting proposals for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment. The goal is: to determine the needs and expectations of the community in order to establish a strategic plan that will increase public awareness and stakeholder involvement - strengthening the methods of communication between the stakeholders and the board. CONTACT AMOUNT: Not to exceed $200,000 CONTRACT TIME PERIOD: No more than 6 months. It. KEY ISSUES FACING THE DISTRICT The Orange County Sanitation District is facing significant expenditures due to the increasing costs of treating wastewater and massive capital improvements. Recent beach closures, scientific studies and an updated strategic plan have lead to major policy changes. These changes include board direction to increase treatment levels, implementation of a disinfection plan, and a legislative amendment to the district charter to allow for treatment of urban runoff. Additionally, OCSD has been mandated to implement General Wastewater Discharge Requirements by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Orange County Sanitation District already has an aggressive capital improvements plan that includes repairs and or construction to replace ageing infrastructure, a visionary recycled potable water project i n partnership with the O range county Water District and new ways to manage and treat increasing amounts of biosolids. Public Input is needed on the key issues. Page t of 8 Orange County Sanitation Dishict October,2002 ' KEY ISSUES: Bicsolids Biosolids are not recycled in Orange county due to lack of open space. Recent county ordinances have banned the uae of class B biosolids land application. Safety concerns and the view held by other counties that Orange County should 'lake care of its own waste;'have contributed to the problem. Previous to 2001, OCSD was using four counties in central and southern California for land application on agricultural lands that _ grew non-food crops. OCSD has investigated several potential avenues for future bicsolids management including composting and transportation of biosolids via truck and/or rail. The ordinances banning biosolids land applications will result in higher operating costs for the management and beneficial reuse of OCSD biosolids. The possible treatment levels would exacerbate the situation. Over the next few years OCSD will see its costs for the management of and beneficial reuse of biosolids double. Urban Runoff Since 1999, OCSD has worked with local cities within its service area to create urban diversion runoff. Currently, OCSD has 14 diversion sites contributing approximately 4 million gallon of urban runoff each day. This water is taken in and treated by the district. The program has significantly impacted Huntington City and State beaches by lowering high bacteria readings directly related to urban runoff. Assembly Bill 1892, authored by Assemblyman Tom Harman expands the charter of the Orange County Sanitation District and gives the district the authority to acquire, construct, operate, maintain,and furnish facilities to treat urban runoff within OCSD's service area. With the passage of AB1892 OCSD is now in One position to assist the County of Orange and its member agencies in developing cost- effective solutions for controlling the water quality impacts associated with urban runoff. Expanding on its existing urban runoff diversion program, OCSD will look to partner with its member agencies to finance,construct,and operate runoff-treatment facilities and natural treatment systems. Disinfection On Feb 22, 2002 General Manager Blake Anderson requested that the OCSD Board of Directors move to disinfection of all treated wastewater released to the ocean. Reducing the amount of pathogens in the treated wastewater is necessary to a Iiminate any uncertainty that OCSD is protecting the public health of recreational swimmers and surfers. 100%Secondary Treatment On July 17, 2002, the board of directors of the Orange County Sanitation District voted 13-12 to nave to a higher level of wastewater treatment The estimated cost for the upgrade is$400 million. It is $271 million more than choosing to continue tortenr operations at 50 percent advanced primary and 50 percent Page 2 of 8 , Orange County Sanitation District October,2002 - secondary treatment. The design and comtruction of new secondary facilities may take up to I I years to complete Infrastructure Improvements In addition to the costs to upgrade the level of treatment,OCSD has a 20 year capital improvement budget of$1.6 billion dollars.These projects consist of plant improvements to both facilities, and replacement and rehabilitation of aging pipe infrastrecture in the community. Recycled Potable Water The Groundwater Replenishment System is an innovative project Replenishment Project jointly sponsored by the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District. It will purify highly treated wastewater that is now discharged to the ocean using advanced water treatment fecilities such as micrefrltration, reverse osmosis and u Itraviolet disinfection equipment.The water will be injected into the percolation ponds near the Santa Ana River for eventual use as drinking water. The underground basin provides 75% of the water used by north and central Orange County cities. A public outreach and education plan is currently being coordinated by Porter Novelli Group of Irvine. More information on the GWR System ran be found at www.ewrsystem.com, General Wastewater Discharge The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board,based on the Requirements fording that meet beach water closures in Orange County are due to sanitary sewer overflows (SSOa), introduced new requirements. Since most SSOs are preventable, this new order proposes to regulate all sewering agencies in Orange County that are within the Santa Ana Regional Board's jurisdiction. It is anticipated that upon implementation of the requirements specified in this order, beach water closures due to SSOs will be significantly reduced and/or eliminated. III. SCOPE OF WORK The final scope of work will be determined from the proposed work plan submitted by the selected team. The Orange County Sanitation District values creativity and stresses that a team should expand upon the parameters listed in this RFP. The scope of work may be adjusted by the Orange County Sanitation District based on information developed as part of the proposal process. Throughout the tens of the 'contract, the Orange County Sanitation District will maintain control over the priority and weight given each Item. The goal is: to determine the needs and expectations of the community in order to establish a strateoic plan that will increase public awareness and stakeholder involvement - strengthening the methods of communication between the stakeholders and the board. Elements of the plan could include, but are not limited to the following: _ Page 3 of 8 Orange County Sanitation Disbia _ October,2002 - • Community workshops to solicit opinions from the district's various stakeholders. • A creative, comprehensive, and innovative mix of advertising and marketing plans designed to encourage public attendance at the workshops. • Video public service announcements for workshops. • Design, printing and mailing of notifications for the workshops. • Development and production of all collateral materials • Development and maintenance of a community and business outreach database • A written summary/report of all of the information collected from the stakeholder groups. IV WORKPLAN At a minimum, team will consist of a community relations and outreach firth as lead consultant,with a separate public involvement facilitator. All prospective teams will have qualified personnel and subconsultant(s) to accomplish services described herein. In its proposal, each team will clearly identify and demonstrate qualifications in those subject areas described in the scope of work and work plan, in which the team is qualified to provide necessary professional and consulting services using its own staff and identified subconsultants. Any contract will be subject to award by the governing Board of the Orange County Sanitation District. Teams are required to have expertise in the following areas: public outreach; advertising; community facilitation, legislative affairs; and materials design, development and production of materials that will require services in graphic design, art, photography, copyrighting, audio and video production, printing and fulfillment, including storage, handling and targeted distribution. These firms will be selected in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in the selection procedures. V REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Reporting requirements will be established by OCSD after selection, based on the work plan of the selected team. The team should anticipate monthly status reports to staff, weekly emailed updates, based on the work plan requirements; team meetings for planning and updates;regular status reports on deliveries of collateral based on the work plan and contingency meetings to address unforeseen events. VI CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL This section provides the outline that proposals will follow—after the letter of transmittal described in Section VI—with tabs at each lettered section (A through G) and Section H bound separately. Proposals will be typed and will not exceed 35 pages in length for Sections A through D below. A. Identification Page 4 of 8 Orange County Sanitation District October,2002 - - - For both the lead consultant and all subconsultants, indicate the firm name, address, phone numbers, business structure, names and owners of fine, name of designated project manager, names of key staff personnel who will be responsible for completing this assignment, and type of work to be completed by each firm. - B. Experience & Qualifications This section of the proposal should establish the ability of the team to research, plan, implement and evaluate a scope of work that will meet the overriding goal. - Relate the team's experience to the qualifications listed below with three relevant past projects of similar size and scope: 1. Skilled public involvement facilitation 2. Facilitating and structuring and leading public hearings/workshops 3. Work with community and stakeholder workshops 4. Knowledge, experience and/or demonstrated capabilities in Orange County public outreach and involvement 5. Advertising, including materials production 6. Production of PSA's and/or informational videos 7. Experience working with subconsultants proposed 8. Include each project described above on the "references" form found at the end of this request for proposals 9. Media campaigns C. Work Plan By presenting a well-conceived work plan, this section of the proposal should establish the Team's understanding of OCSD's objectives and work requirements and substantiate the bidder's ability to satisfy those objectives and requirements. 1. Overall plan strategy 2. Methods to be used 3. The Plan, i ncluding audiences, methods to encourage public participation, key messages for marketing to each audience, and activities 4. Plan implementation schedule, 5. Evaluation/benchmarking methods to measure qualitative and quantitative effectiveness of program B. A written summary/report of all of the information collected from the stakeholder groups. . D. Proposed staffing and project organization This section of the proposal will establish the qualifications of the proposed project staff. The lead consultant will designate one senior staff person as proposed project manager for the program. This person will serve as day-to-day contact and overall program coordinator. The lead consultant will include a statement that key personnel will be available to the extent proposed for the duration of the project, acknowledging that no person designated as "key" to the project will be removed or replaced without prior written consent of - Page 5 of 8 I Orange County Sanitation District - October,2002 - OCSD. Changing personnel from those listed in the proposal is grounds for termination of the contract. 1. Organization chart 2. Management and key personnel experience and capabilities (lead consultant and subconsultants). Resumes should include: a. Project responsibility b. Education &training _ c. Project experience E. Notiflcatlon of potential conflicts of Interest for lead consultant and subconsultants Lead consultant and all subconsultants will describe all potential conflicts of interest with the Orange County Sanitation District. F. Appendices 1. Samples of work product for projects listed in Section B (as available) 2. Promotional materials for lead consultant and subconsultants G. Cost and Price Proposal The team will prepare a price summary and furnish a narrative explaining and qualifying the prices quoted. Cost information must be bound separately and submitted with the proposal. All activities will be itemized and show hours for all staff services, including administrative and support, by task with totals for each. Communication tools will be further itemized to show cost of design/production and cost of product placement. Billing rate for each member of the team will be included. Subconsultants work should be broken down and shown in the same manner. Wages, overhead, profit and tax should be included in the hourly rate. VII PROPOSAL PREPARATION A pre-proposal meeting is scheduled for October XX at XX p.m. at the Orange County Sanitation District, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. Interested teams are encouraged to attend. After the pre-proposal meeting, all questions will be directed to Sonja Wassgren, Public Information Coordinator via email. Questions received after the meeting will be sent with their answers via email to all interested parties. To request to be included on the smelling list, please email Sonja Wassgren at swassoreneocsd.com. Vlll SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL Proposal will include a letter of transmittal addressed to Sonja Wassgren, which should include the following: • Identification of lead firm and each subconsultant Page 6 of 8 Orange County Sanitation District _ } October,2002 - - • Proposed working relationship among offering consultants • Acknowledgement of receipt of RFP addenda and questions and answers via email, 'd any • Name, title, address and telephone number of contact person during period of proposal evaluation • A statement that the proposal will remain valid for a period not less than 90 days from the date of submittal • Signature of a person authorized to bind to the terns of the proposal - The team will submit 5 bound copies of the proposal and two bound copies of the cost proposal, with one electronic copy of both proposals on floppy disk or CD. Proposals are to be submitted in a sealed envelope bearing the lead consultant's name and address. Cost proposals will be submitted in a separate sealed envelope bearing the lead consultant's name and address. Envelopes should be clearly marked: "Communications RFP" and "Communication RFP Cost Proposal" Deadline for submittal is 4:00 p.m. on December XX, 2002 and should be sent to the attention of: Sonja Wassgren Public Information Coordinator Orange County Sanitation District PO Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 for delivery: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 593-7122 Proposals received after this time will not be accepted. IX SELECTION PROCEDURES The team will be selected based on the strength of the proposal and the strength of the presentationlinterview. Evaluation Criteria - Teams will be evaluated on the following Criteria: • Ability to meet qualifications listed in Section IV • References from past clients for projects of similar size and scope • Creative work plan and innovative approaches • Strength of advertising and experience in generating large public turnout at community forums • Experience in providing similar services • Cost and price proposal, taking into consideration reasonableness, competitiveness and adequacy of support data • Completeness of response in accordance with RFP instructions Presentations - Page 7 of 8 i Orange County Sanitation District _ f October,2002 A maximum of three teams may be invited to make oral presentations, based on the evaluation of each team's written proposal. Finalists will be notified by January XX, 2003. Interviews of the finalists by staff and/or board subcommittee will be held between January XX and XXX, 2003. The team's proposed project manager will be the lead presenter, with a key day-to-day person from each subconsultant present. Other personnel designated as"key" should also be present. Notification of Award and Debriefing The contract award is planned to be made by January XX, 2003. Teams that submit a proposal in response to this RFP will be notified in writing regarding the team that was awarded the contract. Teams that were not awarded the contract may obtain an explanation concerning the strengths and weaknesses of their proposal. Unsuccessful bidders that wish to be debriefed must request the debriefing in writing. X OTHER INFORMATION RFP Expenses. The Orange County Sanitation District will not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by bidders in the preparation of their proposals. Bidders should not include any such expenses as part of their proposals. Joint Offers. The Orange County Sanitation District's intent is to contract with a single consultant. Proposers should designate a lead organization and lead person. Contract Term. It is anticipated that the agreement resulting from this solicitation, 9 awarded, will be a contract for a period XX extending from the date of execution, with an option to renew for another XX period. Contract Authority. Orange County Sanitation District will be the contracting agency. Disclaimer. Issuance of this RFP and receipt of proposals does not commit the Orange County S anitalion D istrict to award a contract. The Orange C ounty Sanitation D istrict reserves the right to postpone opening for their own convenience, to accept or reject any or all proposals received in response to this RFP, to negotiate with more than one bidder simultaneously, or to cancel all or part of this RFP. Orange County Sanitation District also reserves the right to apportion the award among two or more proposers. Page 8 of 8 t MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT September 16, 2002, 5:30 p.m. Committee Chair Pickier called to order the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System at 5:30 p.m. on September 16, 2002 in the Boardroom at OCWD. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the roll was called and the Recording Secretary reported a quorum as follows: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Iry Pickier, Chairman Shirley McCracken Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Kathryn Bar, Alternate No. 1 Brian Donahue, Alternate No. 1 Jan Flory,Alternate No. 2 Laurann Cook, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Staff: Directors Kalil Bum-Roy, Dick Corneille, Blake Anderson Jan Debay —Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Jim Herberg Wes Bannister Abdul Rashidi—Montgomery Watson Hans David Ludwin Dennis Bilodeau Dennis MacLain—City of Huntington Beach Lisa Murphy Staff: George Martin—City of Anaheim Bob Ooten Virginia Grebbien Patrick Lynch - Dickstein Shapiro Morin&Oshinsky,LLP Wendy Sevenandt Steve Conklin Guy Carrozzo, John Collins— Counsel: Andrew Czomy City Councilmen of Fountain Valley Brad Hogin Joanne Daugherty Debra Bums—DOB Engineering Shivaji Deshmukh Patrick Scanlon—So CA Water Co. Bill Everest Randy Furhman—Huntington Beach Jill Everhart Chris Townsend, Shawn Fitzgerald John Kennedy Townsend Public Affairs Clark Ida Bob Finn, Steve Line—Brown &Caldwell Mike Markus Jim McKibben—Westin Engineering Mehul Patel Lily Pham Laura Thomas Mike Wehner Ron Wildernuth CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Anthony seconded by Director McCracken and carried, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held August 26, 2002 were approved as mailed. - 1 - 1 Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 16, 2002 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development. Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project OCWD General Manager Virginia Grebbien gave an update on the overview and changes of the O&M Agreement presentation given to the Committee on August 26. She stated that the changes have verbally been agreed between her and OCSD General Manager Blake Anderson and recommended that the Committee approve Draft 33 of the Agreement. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Anthony and carried, approval of the Joint Exercise Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project, incorporating comments from the Joint Cooperative Committee all in a manner approved by the OCWD and OCSD General Managers and Counsels. Agendize for October 16 OCWD Board Meeting and for October 23 OCSD Board Meeting. 3. Integrated Information System—Task Order to Westin Engineering, Inc. Program Manager Bill Everest reported that within the Integrated Information System (IIS) program, it is necessary to start the Preliminary Design and Implementation Planning forthe IIS. He introduced Laura Thomas, OCWD Electrical Engineer, who gave a presentation on the development plan for the IIS including schedule and budget. She recommended that the Committee award a task order to Westin Engineering, Inc. for professional engineering services for preliminary design in an amount of$290,000. She noted that the remaining program, Tasks 26-29, would be combined under one contract for a total value of$6,310,000. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Barr and carried unanimously, approval of a Task Order to Westin Engineering for Task 25, Preliminary Design and Implementation Planning for the Integrated Information System for the Groundwater Replenishment System In an amount not to exceed $290,000. (Cost shared equally between OCWD/OCSD.) Agendize for September 18 OCWD Board Meeting and September 25 OCSD Board Meeting. -2 - Y Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 16, 2002 ' 4. Renew Grant Support Specialist OCWD Public Information Officer Ron Wildermuth introduced Chris Townsend, Townsend Public Affairs, Inc., who reported that additional funding might be available through Prop 50, which is on the November ballot. He also reported that his fine would defend monies already approved through Prop 13 funding through California Department of Water Resources. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Barr and carried unanimously, staff is authorized to issue a Task Order to Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $66,000 to secure additional grant funding from Prop 50 and other available grant sources. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 5. Public Information and Education Update No discussion. 6. Status Report Mr. Everest reported on the following: A. Two proposals were received today for the Process Control System Equipment Pre-selection: a. Emerson/Westinghouse's proposal present worth cost was $2,338,202 of which the capital (contract) cost is $1,918,069 and is less than the budgeted amount of$4.8 million; and b. US Filter Controls/Honeywell's proposal present worth cost of$4,172,874, including the capital (contract) cost of$2,811,537. He reported that staff would evaluate the proposals for responsiveness. He noted that both proposers are US companies and the pre-selection of the Process Control System equipment will be brought back to the Committee for consideration in October. B. A three-day workshop to review the AWTF 60% design package will be held on October 2-4. REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGERS — No comments. REPORT OF COUNSEL - No comments. - 3 - Y Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes September 16, 2002 , DIRECTORS COMMENTS Director Anthony thanked both general managers and counsels for their work on the 0&M Agreement. He requested a detailed cost and schedule update on the project. PUBLIC COMMENTS — No comments ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, October 14 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. - 4 - t BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeebngDate Tcaa.oroo-. 101 2 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number IS(C) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve a budget amendment of$35,166,000 increasing the Orange County Sanitation District's budget for the Groundwater Replenishment System to $236,372,000, and, (2)Approve Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project. SUMMARY • An increase in Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) budget of$35,166,000 is being requested, increasing the overall OCSD project cost to $236,372,000. Additional grants totaling $14,500,000 are shown in the attached Budget Information Table, increasing OCSD's share of grants (reimbursable costs)to $45,000,000. OCSD's net project cost, with anticipated grant receipts deducted is $191,372,000, a net increase of$20,666,000 over the previous budget. • The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment (GW R) System and the Green Acres Project (Agreement), provides a detailed plan for water delivery for both the Green Acres Project (GAP) and GW R System, including financing, limits of spending authority, OCSD delivery of wastewater, OCSD use of reclaimed water, operations, and maintenance of the GW R System. • The Agreement was unanimously approved by the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) on September 16, 2002. An earlier draft of the Agreement was last reviewed with the OCSD Committees in February 2002. • Approval of the Agreement will be recommended at the October 2002 OCSD FAHR, OMTS and PDC Committees. • The delegation of authority contained in the Agreement has been revised to grant the Orange County Water District (OCWD) General Manager authority to award contracts up to $50,000. The Agreement also gives the OCWD Board authority to award contracts up to $10,000,000, following approval by the JCC. This revision was made to be consistent with provisions in OCW D's enabling legislation. • The OCSD Board and OCWD Board would both have to approve contracts in' excess of$10,000,000. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. No expenditure authorization is being requested at this time. The Boards of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and Orange County Water District (OCWD) approved the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System on March 28, 2001,with the cost of design and construction to be paid in equal 50% shares by each agency. In June 2002, the OCSD Board approved a budget of$201,206,000. In August 2002 a revised Engineers Estimate was prepared with the capital cost presented at a Board workshop at$427,000,000 in current dollars. The construction cost has now been escalated to the mid-point of construction and added to the construction budget. The construction budget amendment of$33,023,000 is recommended that includes • Increases in capital cost for project changes • Escalation to the mid-point of construction • A contingency of 10% for contracts at 60% design level • A contingency of 5% for contracts at a 90% design level. The overall project contingency budget is increased by $2,143,000 to allow 10%for non-construction contract costs based on unexpended funds and 5% for construction contract change orders. The total project budget for OCSD's share of the project cost is $236,372,000 as shown in the revised Budget Information Table. If the $45,000,000 in anticipated project grants is deducted, OCSD's net cost share is $191,372,000. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2002-03 ciP Budget Sec.8, page 157) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. - ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) An increase in OCSD budget share of$35,166,000 is being requested, increasing the overall OCSD project cost to $236,372,000. Additional grants totaling $14,500,000 are also shown in the attached Budget Information Table, increasing OCSD's share of grants (reimbursable costs)to $45,000,000. OCSD's net project cost, with anticipated grant receipts deducted is $191,372,000 a net increase of $20,666,000 over the previous budget. Page 2 9 8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BACKGROUND The Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System to date has been developed under a cost sharing agreement as amended. Under this agreement, the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)was established to provide project management, authority was delegated to the JCC, and provisions were prescribed for cost sharing. In accordance with direction received from the JCC, Staff and General Counsel of both agencies have prepared a new comprehensive agreement, which, if approved, will supercede the GWR System cost sharing agreement and all other agreements between Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). The new agreement, titled the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of the GWR System and the Green Acres Project (Agreement), provides a detailed plan for water delivery for both the Green Acres Project (GAP) and GWR System, including financing, limits of spending authority, operations, and maintenance of the GWR System. A draft Agreement was presented at the October 10, 2001 FAHR Committee and the November 1, 2001 PDC Committee meetings. Findings of the National Water Research Institute (NWRI) regarding their review of the equity of the cost sharing provisions were presented at the January 14, 2002, JCC meeting. A revised draft Agreement was presented at the January 28, 2002, JCC meeting, and was presented at the PDC, FAHR, and OMTS meetings in February. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY PROVISIONS Under the proposed Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (Agreement), the General Managers, the JCC, and the full Boards of OCWD and OCSD have contracting authority. The procedure for approval of Purchase Orders, Task Orders, Professional Services Agreements, and Construction Contracts is to go through the General Managers, the JCC, and then to the full Boards as delegated in the Agreement. Authorizations for contracting, per the Agreement, do not include other Board Committees at OCSD or OCWD. The contracting authority of the OCWD General Manager will be increased to $50,000. For all contracts, agreements, or purchase orders between $50,000 to $10,000,000, the General Managers and the JCC will recommend approval to the OCWD Board. Through this agreement, the OCSD Board would be delegating authority to the OCWD Board (with recommendation from the JCC)the award of contracts that are under $10,000,000. Contracts in excess of $10,000,000 would require both the OCWD and OCSD Boards authority to award. Page 3 'a OCSD OUTFALL RELIEF OCSD considered multiple peak flow management options in the 1999 Strategic Plan. One option was construction of a second 5-mile ocean outfall to discharge peak daily and wet weather flows. Other options included attenuation of peaks using in-plant storage, and reducing peak discharges by maximizing effluent flow to the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System during high flow events. The preferred alternative adopted by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Board included (1) Using existing in-plant storage (7 million gallons), (2) Maximizing flow to the GWR System (100 mgd), and (3) Using the emergency 1-mile (78-inch diameter) outfall with an estimated frequency of once every three years at flow rates projected for the year 2020. It was assumed that as much secondary effluent as possible would be routed to the 78-inch outfall during such an emergency, and that no disinfection would be used. In July 2002, the OCSD Board of Directors adopted a resolution requiring that all of the treated wastewater being discharged to the ocean meet the Clean Water Act definition of secondary treatment (30 mg/L TSS, 30 mg/L BOD). This action followed an earlier commitment by OCSD to provide a level disinfection that would meet State bathing water standards (AB-411) after initial dilution. Questions have been raised regarding how OCSD might use the 78-inch diameter (1-mile) emergency outfall given this new level of treatment. Recognizing that conditions had changed since 1999, the Interim Strategic Plan Update was prepared in June 2002. This update incorporated, among other changes, revised flow estimates. The projected OCSD average daily flow rate in 2020 was revised downward from 352 mgd to 321 mgd. The combination of lower flow projections and a commitment to secondary treatment standards with pathogen reduction provides new conditions in which consider the OCSD usage of the GWR System as a peak flow management tool. Total flow projections for OCSD in 2020 as developed in 1998 and revised in 2002 are shown below: Projection 1999 Strategic Plan 2002 Interim Update 020 Average Dry Weather Flow, mgd 352 321 020 Peak Daily Dry Weather Flow, mgd 502 459 020 Peak Wet Weather Flow, mgd 750 624 Frequency of use of 1- mile (78-inch dia.) Once per 3 years Once per10 utfall with GWR System, yr. 2020 years Frequency of use of 1- mile (78-inch dia.) 1.7 times per year 1.3 times per outfall without GWR System, yr. 2020 year Page 4 The projections above show that the Interim Update projected peak wet weather discharge is 126 mgd lower than the1999 Strategic Plan (624 mgd vs. 750 mgd). The 1999 Strategic Plan predicted emergency use of the 1-mile outfall once per three years in 2020 with the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR)System providing 100 mgd of flow relief, and 1.7 times per year without the GWR System. Since these scenarios included discharging undisinfected effluent,which could be a blend of primary and secondary effluent under certain conditions, it was assumed that beaches would be closed for several days following such an emergency. With the lower flow projections for 2020 in the Interim Strategic Plan Update, there would be less risk of discharging effluent through the 1-mile outfall. Without the GWR System, the predicted emergency use of the 1-mile outfall in 2020 is 1.3 times per year using these lower flow projections. This less frequent discharge of more highly treated effluent adds a considerable factor of safety to peak wet weather beach closure concerns. While this is a positive outcome from the July 2002 treatment level decision, preliminary discussions with regulators indicate that the 1-mile outfall would continue to be permitted for emergency use only, and that beach closures would still be likely during an emergency event even with secondary treated effluent. This preliminary opinion is based on the fact that our effluent would not be completely disinfected during a peak flow event, and that past history has shown that discharges through the 1-mile outfall routinely reached the shoreline prior to it being taken out of service in the 1970's. While the Board of Director's July secondary treatment standard decision will help mitigate the impact of peak wet weather discharges, it does not eliminate the need for peak flow relief from the GWR System. ALTERNATIVES Without the approval of an agreement between the two agencies, the agencies would continue to operate under the existing agreements, which do not sufficiently address all the issues facing the two agencies. CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)for the GWR System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)and the Orange County Water District(OCW D) Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Cost estimate summary 2. Draft Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement WS:sa G:ta,p.dtatagenda11e08rd Agenda Reponat2002 eaerd Agenda Repwh\1002Jtenn 15(c).GWRe Joint Agreemenl.doc Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36 G NA CURRENT ROPOSE IS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASX AOTHOhIZED •' PROP09E0 ;PROJECT BUDGET ,AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDIT,UIRE ERPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ' INdkEASE• REVISED BUDGET ; t_-.TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORZATION TODATEE: . JC'DA Protector Development S 700 000 S 4,000 S 4 000 $ 4 000 $ 4,000 It 4,000 100% 1 StodiealPemgttio S 3313000 s 3 13000 S 3,300000 S 330D 000 3313000 100% 7 Consulbnl PSA S 7500000 18637649 S 18631840 S 16530764 18830784 S 47370D0 28% Design Staff $ 2349.000 6,357,000 S 5 7 000 $ 6357000 $ 5,357,000 $ 1.122 000 21% Construction 2 4 Contrail Is 86481 500 S 157200000 -33,023M S 190223000 S 9642655 $ 9642655 S 2600000 27% ConsWctlun 3 Adminiseation S 2653900 E 6853000 E 88530D0 5496 19 5496519 $ 239000 4% COOaWdion Ins on $ 9345600 $ 326000 E 328000 $ 82000 0% 5 ' Contingency $ 12.895,000 S 9,721.151 S -21/ 000. S 11.864,151 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 121,925,000 E 201,208,000 S 35,166,000 E 236.372,000 E 40,630,958 S 40.630,958 $ 12.057,000 30% ReMbursable Costs 1 1$ 30,500,000 E 14.500.000 $ 45,000.D00 1 $ 1.653.000 PROJECT NET 1 $ 121.925,000 1 $ 170.706,000 E.20,666.000 $ 191.372,000 $ 40.630.958 S 40.630.958 1 $ 10.414.000 1 26% NOTES: 1-Funds authorized to date includes multiple contracts Issued under the temp of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District 2-Funds authorized to date include Pipeline at Theo Lacy Jail,SCE substation construction,temporary office facilities,agreement and easements,production of MFAN vendor design documents,and Owner Controlled Insurance Program. 3-Funds authorized to date include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27,2002 4-Revised budget includes a)updated construction Cost estimate,b)escalation to mid-point of construction,and c)I G%contingency for contracts at 60%design phase or 5% Contingency for Contracts at 90%design phase. 5-Revised budget includes a)5%Contingency for Construction change orders,and b)10%Contingency for all unspent non-construction Contract project costs C:g aar4a am Silgnga"eLLoral Setiinga\T=,xxary into"FIIHt0;K48FOuJgM tide ea 1 Ica GM OM agreement 0o102xleio5m GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM Cost Estimate Summary - October 9,2002 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Cost in Cost in Escalated to March 2001 Oct 2002 Midpoint of Element dollars dollars Construction 30% Design $/milion $/million $/million AWT Facilities 228.3 283.4 306.3 Barrier Facilities 10.4 17.9 17.7 Pipeline 1 65.71 71.0 1 75.2 ELA 47.6 54.7 54.7 Subtotal 352.0 427.0 453.9 Less Grants 57,5 90.0 90.0 Net Total 294.51 337.0 363.9 COMPARISON OF ITEMS IMPACTING COST BETWEEN MARCH 2O01 AND OCTOBER 2002 Cost in Escalated to Cost in Oct 2002 Midpoint of Element March 2001 dollars Construction 30% Design $/million $/million $/million Scope Changes/Cost Refinement 12.8 13.1 Insurance 5.4 6.0 6.0 Contingency 34.7 42.6 42.3 Escalation 13.6 40.5 Total Change rom March 2001 75.0 101.9 Groundwater Replenishment System 60%AWTF Cost Estimate Evaluation October 9,2002 Cost Change Since Item Description Deecdpdon of Change March 2001 CHANGE IN SCOPE 1 AWTF-Microfiltretion System Added additional MF membrane 8 ancillary equipment for 36 modules $988,050 2 AWTF-Microfthration System MF structures increased to Be mgd $1.521,985 3 AWTF-Mlcro6lbatlen System MF piing Increased due to structure size increase $80,437 4 AWTF-Microfilbatlon System Install temporary equipment into permanent structure $920,000 5 AWTF- Hydrogen Peroxide Added Permanent Hydrogen Peroxide system as required by DHS $1,078700 6 AWTF-yard Piping OHS required Blending facilities $540,500 7 AWTF Workshops $3.700.000 TOTAL CHANGE IN SCOPE $8.629672 DESIGN REFINEMENT 1 AWTF-Activated Sludge Meter Magnetic meter vault added W AS line before Vault screening facility for OCSD reliability $345.000 2 AWTF-Temporary MF Temporary MF system additional equipment coat 5552,300 3 AWTF-Temporary MF Add UV Demonstration Test Unit $143.581 4 AWTF-Micrpfilbetion System MF structures split into two structures,Increase W 86 mild,larger office buildings $5,437.815 5 AWTF-Mlcrofiltration System PCS Modifications $57o803 6 AWTF-MlcroSioallon System AviusUwl Panels $1,189,100 7 AWTF-Mlcrofilirallon System Silencers $273.700 8 AWTF-Mlcrofiltraden System Fire Sprinklers $273,700 9 AWTF-MlcroMoater,System Permanent MF equipment bid was lower than estimate (54,726,000) 10 AWTF-MicrofiiVation System Elevator $162,150 11 AWTF-RO Transfer PS Acoustical Panels 5270,250 12 AWTF-RO Transfer PS Silences $263.350 13 AWTF-RO Transfer PS MF building increased in size for the MF Seaman pumps, additional isolabon wall,pump modeling mean addiuom $1,102.850 14 AWTF-RO Electrical Building Added Emergency and Standby Generelpre $1,108,600 15 AWTF-PC System Fire Sprinklers $456.550 16 AWTF-RO System Acoustical Panels $1,214,400 17 AWTF-PC System Silencer _ $746.350 18 AWTF-UV System PCS Modifications $345,000 19 AWTF-UV System UV Equipment more expensive $1.890.600 20 AWTF-Finished Product Water Required to move water to influent pipeline and to me Bypass Structure BAR $575,000 21 AWTF-Electddal/Power Deleted emergency generators ($4137000) 22 AWTF-Low Voltage Substation Added OCWO KW Substation.low voltage awe $2.485.150 (SCE) 23 AWTF-High Voltage Substation Added SCE Substation $2.396,000 (SCE) 24 AWTF-Instrumentation Added 90"magnetic now meter for OCSD reliabifity, $121.900 25 AMF-Instrument tion Delete 72"magnetic flow meter from Trickling Filters by OCSD $97750 26 AWTF-Instrumentation PCS instrumentallm upgrades.additional and spare VO,instrumentation not in MFIROIUV better defined $4.778.374 27 AWTF-Instrumentation PCS Proposal was lower than estimate (51.176.000) - NO:Can SummeN Camper Summey(OCSm As pen:10uISR002 9p9aEMeer:seem In 1 i.A.WI'M > Groundwater Replenishment System 60%AWTF Cost Estimate Evaluation October 9, 2002 Cost Change Since Item Description Description or Change March 2001 28 AWTF-Screening Facilities Added solids mantling system to meet OCSD requiremems $135,700 29 AWTF-PWPS Acoustical Panels S416,300 _ 30 AWTF-PWPS Silencers $219.650 31 AWTF-Lime System Additional Silos $208.150 32 AWTF-Ume System Larger Building for(he added silos $227,700 33 AWTF-Ume System More Expensive Lime Saluralors $270,250 34 AWTF-L'ues System Added Polymer System $180,650 35 AWTF-Chemical System Chemical Coating in Chemical containment area $234,600 36 AWTF-Sitevmrk Increased excavaeordBackfill per MWH $676,200 37 AWTF-yard Piping Added pipelines per MWH $270,250 36 AWTF-yard Piping Added allowsnca for complexity par MWH $1,014,300 39 AWTF-Van!Piping Added allowance for corrosion prelectlon par MWH S405,950 40 AWTF-FoundetiordPlles Increased unit cost per MWH comment 57,239,683 41 AWTF-Category 1 Demolition Increased allowance for surface demolition and cpmpledty per MWH $1,631,900 42 AWTF-Category 2 Demolition Increased allmvance for pile removal and oewatetng $1.310,000 43 AWTF Added program manager and CM hailer contract per OCWD $802,000 da AWTF Increased Allmanre(or fire water pump station $678,200 45 AWTF Insurance-Difference Between OCIP B Estimate S630.979 46 AWTF Integrated Information System-Install $3.100.000 47 AWTF Escalation $32,500.000 48 AWTF Contingency $6.157.214 Total AWTF $69.168.728 1 Barrier Wells&Pipeline SC W ater Well(Inside travel zone) $1,500,000 2 Barrier Wells&Pipeline BE Barrier-Dminlines $247.250 3 Benner Wells&Pipeline BE Barrier-Control Valves it Flow Meter $404,600 4 Banter Wells&Pipeline BE Barrier-Additional Appunancea(Valves, Vemtls,Fdtings) S202.400 5 Border Wells&Pipeline BE Barrier-Spedlic Allowances for Mobilization& Demobilization $164,450 6 Banter Wells B Pipeline SE Barer-Spedfic Allowance for Sheeting and Sharing $123,050 7 Banner Wells&Pipeline Two New Deep Wells(Drilling$943,DD0&Wellhead $454.250) $1,397.250 8 Barrier Walls It Pipeline Additional Monitoring Well(DHS Requlremem) S793.500 9 Barrier Wells&Pipeline Additional Testing(Flow Meter Survey,Directional Survey&Eductor Piping) $149.500 10 Barer Wells It Pipeline Additional Wenhearl Appurtances - $690.000 11 Barer Wells&Pipeline PCs System for 8 Wellsites S322,go0 12 Barrier Walls&Pipeline Insurance-Difference Between OCIP&Estimate $86,250 13 Barrier Wells B Pipeline Escalation $800.000 14 Bonier Wells&Pipeline Contingency $464.059 Total Barrier Wells&Pipeline $7,348,509 1 Pipelines increased Tunnels&Steel $1.466.542 2 Pipelines Escalation $7.100,000 3 Pipelines Contingency $911.340 Total Pipelines S9,476,882 TOTAL DESIGN REFINEMENT S85,992,119 ELA Lie:Co>r Summery Cnargee Sum,urymOCSDm tl> p>b:Id1YM]r Spre>E>nee9 Sheelt(2) 2 TI.:2.39 PM Groundwater Replenishment System 60% AWTF Cost Estimate Evaluation October 9, 2002 Cost Change Simi, Item Description Description of Change IBarsh 2001 1 EIA MWH-Conslnic ion Management Services 51.000.000 2 ELA Soils&Materials Tailing 52.970.000 3 ELA Converse Consultants-Lacy Testing 531,000 4 EIA AKM Engineers-Barrier Pipeline Review $19,500 - 5 ELA Carl Nelson-Contract Employee (5131,000) 6 ELA COM-Reduction in snipe for If$System ($3.100.000) 7 ELA CDM-Additional Design Services 5925.813 8 ELA Howard Almgren-Initial VE 559.460 9 EIA Jim Williams-Contact Employee ($118,400) 10 ELA SOTvare-Hardware ($995,740) 11 ELA SCE-License Agreement 57,233 12 ELA Separation Process Inc.-Design Services $114,665 13 ELA Tom Dawes-Contract Employee ($414,000) 14 EIA TRC $20.000 15 Et WCanaUtanl (5398.900) 16 EIA VE Team ($17.290) 17 ELA Integrated Information System-Design 52.347,500 18 ELA Riverview Golf Course-Revenue Mitigation 5255,000 19 EIA Pone,Novelti-Public Education&Information $3.027.750 20 EIA Townsend-Sacramenlo Lobby $132.000 21 ELA Contingency $1.371.932 TOTAL ELA $7,106.523 TOTAL PROJECT INCREASE $101,928,314 sa:cow s� cwc..�ocsm ea oa. �aisaoax s,n. N'.Sr2Ml 9) 3 1- 2:39PM Groundwater Replenishment System - - Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement - October 11, 2002 JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM AND THE GREEN ACRES PROJECT October , 2002 Draft 33 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement - October 11,2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECITALS.......................................................................................................................I AGREEMENT..................................................................................................................4 I. EXISTING AGREEMENTS..........................................................................................4 1. Termination of the Cooperative Agreement........................................................................................4 2. Termination of the Wastewater Utilization Agreement........................................................................4 II. PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION................................«.........................4 A Finance and Ownership of the System and Related Facilities.............._....................................A 3. Financing of System Facilities.............................................................................................................4 4. Financing of the Related Facilities Upgrades.....................................................................................5 5. Unanticipated Capital Facilities...........................................................................................................5 6. System Ownership..............................................................................................................................5 B. Governance of Planning,Design and Construction Aetivlgq.............. ......_...._.._..__.._....._._..S 7. Scope of Work.....................................................................................................................................5 7.1 Planning, Final Design and Construction......................................................................................5 7.2 Regular Meetings..........................................................................................................................5 7.3 Services Required.........................................................................................................................5 8. Joint Cooperative Committee..............................................................................................................6 9. Delegation of Contracting Authority for the System............................................................................6 10. System Budgets................................................................................................................................7 C. The Water District's Planning,Design and Construction Obiigallons......_............_......................7 11. Day-to-Day Management..................................................................................................................7 12. System Employees............................................................................................................................7 13. Reimbursement and Grant Receipts.................................................................................................7 14. Lands. Easements and Rights-of-Way..............................................................................................8 15. Permits and Approvals.............................................._......................................................................8 16. Plans and Specifications...................................................................................................................8 17. Content of Contract Documents........................................................................................................8 18. Advertisement of Bids..............................................._......................................................................9 19. Construction Management/Acceptance............................................................................................9 20. Reports and Budgets.........................................................................................................................9 D. The Sanitation District's Planning,Design and Construction Obl1gat1ons................_..._._....._._..9 21. Payment of Invoices..........................................................................................................................9 i Draft 33 rattan w:wxruosi ooc Groundwater Replenishment System _ Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement - - October 11,2002 22. Trickling Filter Upgrades................................................................................................................... 9 . 23, Ellis Avenue Pump Station Upgrades...............................................................................................9 24. Reduction In Wastewater Supply......................................................................................................9 25. Lease of Property............................................................................................................................ 10 26. Grant of License to the Water District to Use an Entrance on the Sanitation District's Property.... 10 27. Grant of License to the Water District for Temporary Construction Staging Areas........................ 10 - III. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.......................................................................10 A. The Water District's Operations and Maintenance Obligations.....................................................11 28. Water District Operation and Maintenance..................................................................................... 11 29. Acceptance of Specification Influent............................................................................................... 11 30. Capability to Accept Peak Flows..................................................................................................... 12 31. Electrical Power Supply.................................................................................................................. 12 32. NPDES Permit................................................................................................................................. 12 33. Water Reclamation Permit.............................................................................................................. 12 34. System Employees.......................................................................................................................... 13 35. Staffing Plan, Use of Contractors.................................................................................................... 13 36. Regular Meetings............................................................................................................................ 13 37. System Modifications...................................................................................................................... 13 38. Compliance with Laws..................................................................................................................... 13 39. Monthly and Annual Reports........................................................................................................... 13 40. Annual Budgets...............................................................................................................................13 41. Accounting.......................................................................................................................................14 42. Records and Reports...................................................................................................................... 14 43. Regulatory Reporting...................................................................................................................... 14 44. Annual Independent Audit............................................................................................................... 14 45. Insurance.........................................................................................................................................14 46. Reclaimed Water Service To The Sanitation District...................................................................... 15 46.1 Cost of Reclaimed Water.......................................................................................................... 15 46.2 Quality of Reclaimed Water...................................................................................................... 15 46.3 Minimum Delivery of Project Reclaimed Water........................................................................ 15 46.4 Ownership of Green Acres Project Reclaimed Water Facilities............................................... 15 47. Quality of Reclamation Plant Waste................................................................................................ 1e 48. Discharge of Excess Reclaimed Water....................................................................I...................... 16 49. Metering, Measurement of Flows and Invoices.............................................................................. 1e 50. Water Quality Monitoring................................................................................................................. 1e 51. Independent Contractor Status....................................................................................................... 16 52. Costs of Addressing Newly Discovered Contaminants...................................................................17 53. Other Costs..................................................................................................................................... 17 B. The Sanitation District's Operations and Maintenance Obligations.............................................17 54. Delivery and Quality of Wastewater................................................................................................ 17 55. Industrial Pretreatment and Pollution Source Control Program...................................................... 18 56. Acceptance of Waste Streams to be Discharged to the Sanitation District.......................:............ 18 57. Further Conditioning or Treatment of Waste Streams to be Discharged to the Sanitation District. 19 it Draft 33 14 6 31 w.W2NJNI oac Groundwater Replenishment System Development Operation and Maintenance Agreement - - October 11, 2002 58. Costs of Specification Influent......................................................................................................... 19 . 59. Cost of Peak Flow Treatment..........................................................................................................19 60. Costs of Addressing Newly Discovered Contaminants................_............_................................... 19 61. Compliance with Laws............................_......................................................:.................................20 IV. TERM AND TERMINATION .................................................................._.........._...20 ' 62. Tenn................................................................................................................................................20 V. EVENTS OF DEFAULT; DISPUTE RESOLUTION................................_.............20 63. Event of Default......................................................................................................._._...................20 64. Consequence of Water District Default................_.........................................................................20 65. Consequence of Sanitation District Default...................................................................................21 66. Dispute Resolution......................................................._............................................................21 VI. MISCELLANEOUS...............................................».............................._................21 67. Joint Cooperative Committee Review of Operations......................................................................21 68. Force Majeure.................................................................................................................................21 69. Indemnities......................................................................................................................................22 69.1 The Sanitation District's Indemnity For Negligent Acts or Omissions Related to Construction 22 69.2 The Water District's Indemnity............................................................................_........_..........22 69.3 Joint Indemnity..........................................................................................................................22 70. Notices............................................................................................................................................22 71. Successors And Assigns......................................................................................................._........24 72. Further Acts and Assurances................................................................................................_........24 73. Captions......................................................................................................................._.................24 74. Severability......................................................................................................................................24 75. Entire Agreement............................................................................................................................24 76. Modifications In Writing...................................................................................................................24 77. Interpretation...................................................................................................................................24 78. Governing Law................................................................................................................................25 79. No Third-Party aeneficlaries............................................._............................................................25 80. Assignment......................................_...._........................................................................................25 81. Representation and Warranties.........._........................................._........................._....................25 Draft 33 +4ero1.s:rroamnoc JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM AND THE GREEN ACRES PROJECT This Joint Exercise Of Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation And Maintenance Of The Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Project ("Agreement") is made and entered into, to be effective the day of October, 2002, by and between the Orange County Water District (the "Water District") and the Orange County Sanitation District (the "Sanitation District"). The Water District and the Sanitation District are sometimes collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Parties," and individually referred to as each "Party."' RECITALS This Agreement is based on the following facts, mutual understandings and intentions of the Parties: A. The Water District is a public agency created and governed by the Orange County Water District Act (uncodified Act 5683, Stats. 1933, Chapter 924, as amended). The Water District is authorized to acquire, construct, operate and maintain facilities necessary to augment and protect the quantity and quality of the water supply within its boundaries. The Sanitation District is a public agency formed by legislation effective July 1, 1998 to succeed to the powers of then existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and is organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, as amended. The Sanitation District is authorized to acquire, construct, operate and maintain facilities for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and water reclamation facilities. B. On January 15, 1997, the Parties entered into an agreement entitled "Second Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization of Reclaimed Wastewater" (the "Wastewater Utilization Agreement"). Pursuant to the Wastewater Utilization Agreement, the Sanitation District diverts secondary wastewater from its secondary clarifiers to two treatment facilities at the Water District, the 'Water Factory 21"facility and the "Green Acres Project" reclamation facility. Water Factory 21 treats the Sanitation District's wastewater and discharges treated water to injection wells designed to prevent seawater intrusion into the Orange County groundwater basin through the Talbert Gap located in the Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley and Costa Mesa areas. The Green Acres Project facility treats wastewater to Title 22 standards for reclaimed water and provides it to users for irrigation and processing. The Water District sends waste brine and other waste streams from Water Factory 21 and the Green Acres Project facility to the Sanitation District for treatment and disposal. The Sanitation District purchases water from the Green Acres Project and uses the water for various purposes at the Sanitation District's treatment plants. ' Unless otherwise required by the context in which any defined term appears, capitalized terms shall have the meanings specified in Exhibit A hereto. Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 C. In February of 1997,the Parties entered into an agreement entitled "Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for Orange County Reclamation Project" initiating project planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System (formerly known as Orange County Regional Reclamation Project or"OCR" Project). This agreement, as amended, established a Joint Cooperative Committee to act as an advisory board for development of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The agreement as amended is referred to in this Agreement as the "Cooperative Agreement." D. As proposed, the Groundwater Replenishment System will take treated secondary wastewater from the Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No. 1 and treat it to specific standards. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, the System and the Green Acres Project will, under base operating conditions, be capable of accepting one hundred and four(104) mgd of wastewater and producing seventy (70) mgd of Product Water, and will, under peak conditions, be capable of accepting one hundred and twenty-eight (128) mgd of wastewater and producing one hundred (100) mgd of Product Water. The wastewater will be treated at advanced wastewater treatment facilities (the "AWT Facilities")to be constructed by the Parties on the Water District's and Sanitation District's property in Fountain Valley. As more specifically described in Exhibit B, the AWT Facilities will include equipment for microfiltration, reverse osmosis and ultraviolet disinfection, and related pumping, power and chemical facilities. The AWT Facilities will replace Water Factory 21. E. Initially, nearly all of the Product Water from the Groundwater Replenishment System will be placed in the Orange County groundwater basin in two ways. First, some of the Product Water will be injected into existing and/or new injection wells designed to prevent seawater intrusion in the Talbert Gap located in the Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley and Costa Mesa areas. Second, some of the Product Water will be pumped to the Water District's Santa Ana River water spreading basins in Anaheim and Orange. From there, the Product Water will percolate into the groundwater basin. In order to convey the water to the spreading basins, the Parties intend to construct a pipeline from Fountain Valley to the basins ("GWR Pipeline"). In addition, a small portion of the Groundwater Replenishment System's Product Water may be used for the Green Acres Project during the summer months, or for industries, businesses, golf courses, parks and other land uses with a need for process water and/or irrigation water. F. The System to be constructed and operated pursuant to this Agreement will have the capacity to produce approximately seventy-two thousand (72,000) acre- feet of Product Water per year. The precise amounts of Product Water produced per year will vary due to weather conditions, available wastewater flows and other factors. The Parties may in the future explore the possibility of expanding the treatment capability of the System in one or more additional phases, and will address any mutually-agreed expansion in one or more amendments to this Agreement. G. T he Parties estimate that: (i) the planning, design and construction of the System components will cost approximately four hundred and twenty-six million.five hundred thousand dollars ($426,500,000); (ii)the trickling filter upgrades described herein will cost approximately filly million dollars ($50,000,000); and (iii)the upgrades to 2 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11, 2002 the Ellis Avenue Pump Station and related diversion facilities will cost approximately twenty-seven million dollars ($27,000,000). The Parties acknowledge that these figures . are estimates and that the Parties' obligations under this Agreement shall not be affected by any increase in the actual cost or any future estimate of the cost of the System or the upgrades described above. The allocation of the costs of the facilities described in this paragraph is set forth on Exhibit C. H. The System will fulfill a number of important purposes. First, the System will provide a new reliable source of water to serve the growing Orange County population. Second, the groundwater recharge will maintain or reduce the average total dissolved solids ("TDS' content of the water in the Orange County groundwater basin. Third, the System will allow the Water District to replace its aging Water Factory 21 facilities. Fourth, the System will provide a source of water for maintaining and enhancing the Talbert Gap Seawater Intrusion Barrier that is reliable, high quality and unaffected by drought conditions. Fifth, by providing water for the Intrusion Barrier and groundwater recharge, the System will help reduce reliance on imported water. Finally, the System will give the Sanitation District a reliable outlet to dispose of up to one hundred (100) million gallons per day("mgd")of secondary treated wastewater for certain periods. This will allow the Sanitation District to delay and possibly eliminate a planned second ocean outfall, needed primarily to dispose of peak flows. I. In entering into this Agreement, each Party is relying on the other Party to perform its obligations hereunder. J. Since signing the Cooperative Agreement, the Parties have studied the planning, engineering, funding, environmental, and economic aspects of the System's design, construction and operation. The Parties have: (a) conducted research on system configuration, equipment testing and equipment demonstration; (b) considered issues relating to size of components (for both the System and the Green Acres Project), environmental compliance, financing (including grants), legal and governance matters, rights-of-way acquisition, standards and public information; and (c) considered regulatory compliance requirements, including permits (from such agencies as the Department of Health Services and the Regional Water Quality Control Board), testing and reporting requirements. The Parties have also completed 30% design of the System and are obtaining the necessary permits for the System. K. On March 28, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Water District and the Board of Directors of the Sanitation District (the "Governing Boards') approved and authorized proceeding with the final design, construction, and operation of the System. In addition, the Governing Boards authorized implementation, to the extent possible, of the Groundwater Producers' recommendations for proceeding with final design, construction, and operation of the System as set forth in their letter dated March 25, 2001. L. This Agreement provides for the further planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of the System by the joint venture of the Parties. This Agreement is a Joint Powers Agreement within the meaning of Government Code § 6500 at seq. Pursuant to this Agreement, the Parties intend to jointly exercise powers 3 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 common to them. The Parties possess, inter alia, the following common powers and authority: (1) the power and authority to construct, operate and maintain facilities, pipelines, other conduits, machinery, and other works to conserve, reclaim, purify, treat, transport or otherwise manage and put to beneficial use water that was recovered from operation of a sewerage system; (2) the power and authority to discharge water so as to replenish the underground basin and other natural water resources; and (3) the power and authority to acquire real and personal property, within or without the Parties' districts, as necessary or convenient for the full exercise of their respective powers. The method by which the Parties intend to jointly exercise these powers is set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement is also intended to set forth the terms and conditions governing (1) the Sanitation District's provision of secondary treated wastewater to the Water District for the Green Acres Project, and (2)the Water District's provision of tertiary treated water to the Sanitation District. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing facts recited and the mutual goals and objectives contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Existing Agreements. 1. Termination of the Cooperative Agreement. This Agreement is intended to supercede the Cooperative Agreement. Therefore, the Cooperative Agreement shall terminate as of the effective date of this Agreement. On termination, the Parties shall have no further obligations under the Cooperative Agreement, except for financial obligations that were incurred prior to termination. 2. Termination of the Wastewater Utilization Agreement. This Agreement is intended to supercede the Wastewater Utilization Agreement. Therefore, the Wastewater Utilization Agreement shall terminate as of the effective date of this Agreement. On termination, the Parties shall have no further obligations under the Wastewater Utilization Agreement, except for financial obligations that were incurred prior to termination. It. Planning, Design and Construction. A. Finance and Ownership of the System and Related Facilities. I Financing of System Facilities. Each Party shall pay fifty percent (50%) of the costs of planning, design and construction of the System described on Exhibit B 4 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 attached hereto. Such costs include but are not limited to (a) payments for professional consultant contract services, and (b) construction projects and other project-related costs approved in accordance with this Agreement. Except as specifically set forth in this Agreement, each Party shall bear the costs of its employees working on the System. 4. Financing of the Related Facilities Upgrades. The Sanitation District shall, at its sole cost and expense, make the trickling filter upgrades described in Section 22 of this Agreement and the upgrades to its Ellis Avenue pump station and related diversion facilities described in Section 23 of this Agreement. 5. Unanticipated Capital Facilities. The Parties contemplate that the System as currently designed will be adequate to accept Peak Flows of Specification Influent. If the System as currently designed proves inadequate to accept Peak Flows of Specification Influent and additional equipment, components or facilities are necessary to provide the required capacity, the Parties shall each pay fifty percent (50%) of the cost of such additional equipment, components or facilities. 6. System Ownership. The Water District shall hold title to all new System facilities to be constructed under this Agreement, including but not limited to the screening facilities, pipelines, pumping facilities, the AWT Facilities, the GW R Pipeline, the seawater barrier facilities and related facilities, and all easements and rights-of-way to be obtained for the System's facilities. The Sanitation District shall retain title to its existing property that will be leased to the Water District for construction of the AWT Facilities pursuant to Section 25 of this Agreement. B. Governance of Planning. Design and Construction Activities. 7. Scope of Work. The Parties will jointly plan, design and construct the System according to the following scope of work. 7.1 Planning. Final Design and Construction. The Parties shall complete design of the System, establish the method of product delivery, prepare construction plans and establish detailed specifications for equipment. The Parties shall also construct the System. To that end, the Parties shall prepare bid documents, solicit bids, negotiate and execute contracts, purchase equipment, provide for construction management, inspect construction projects, and comply with regulatory requirements for operation, testing and start up of the System. 7.2 Regular Meetings. During the design and construction of the System, supervisory personnel from both Parties shall meet weekly to review design and construction issues. 7.3 Services Required. Throughout final design and construction of the System, the Water District and/or the Sanitation District shall obtain a variety of services in the following areas: • Project Management Engineering 5 Groundwater Replenishment System Development Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 • Environmental • Finance • Legal • Grant and Loan Support Public Relations • Construction Management • Construction • Other specialized services as identified and approved pursuant to this Agreement 8. Joint Cooperative Committee. Ultimate authority for the planning, design and construction of the System rests with the Governing Boards of the Water District and the Sanitation District. In order to facilitate and expedite the development process, the Parties hereby continue the Joint Cooperative Committee previously established pursuant to the Cooperative Agreement and delegate to that Committee and to the General Managers certain authority to direct and oversee planning, design and construction activities as set forth below. As provided under the Cooperative Agreement, the Joint Cooperative Committee will continue to consist of a total of six (6) directors, including three (3) directors appointed by the Water District and three (3) directors appointed by the Sanitation District. In addition, the Water District and the Sanitation District shall appoint three alternates for each agency. For each Party, an alternate shall serve on the Committee in the event that a director is absent. The Joint Cooperative Committee shall annually elect one of its members as Chair and one of its members as Vice-Chair who shall preside at all meetings. A quorum for the purpose of transacting business shall consist of two members from each of the two boards of directors of the Parties. All actions of the Joint Cooperative Committee shall require a majority vote of the members present at a meeting; provided, however, any approval or recommendation of the Joint Cooperative Committee pursuant to Section 9 shall require the affirmative vote of two members appointed by each of the Parties. 9. Delegation of Contracting Authority for the Planning. Design and Construction of the System. In order to further facilitate and expedite the development process, the Sanitation District hereby delegates to the Water District Board of Directors the final authority, consistent with the limits set forth below, for the approval, award and execution of all contracts and change orders necessary for planning, design and construction of the System, including professional service contracts, construction contracts and other contracts ("System Contracts"), which authority shall be implemented pursuant to this Section. The General Manager of the Water District shall have the authority to issue notice of bids or requests for proposals, and award and execute each System Contract with payments of not more than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and shall have the authority to execute all other System Contracts subject to the following: (a) For each System Contract with payments in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), but not more than ten million dollars ($10,000,000), the General Managers and the Joint Cooperative Committee shall have recommended, and the Board of Directors- 6 Groundwater Replenishment System Development Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11, 2002 of the Water District shall have approved, the award of such System Contract. (b) For each System Contract with payments in excess of ten million dollars ($10,000,000), the General Managers and the Joint Cooperative Committee shall have recommended, and the Governing Boards shall have approved, the award of such System Contract. (c) For each System Contract with payments in excess of the applicable line item in the System Budget, the Governing Boards shall have approved the bid notice or request for proposal documents, if any, and the award of such System Contract. 10. System Budgets. The Water District and the Sanitation District have approved a joint budget for the development and construction of the System, which budget is attached as Exhibit D. To the extent that additional funds are required to complete the development and construction of the System, the Parties will meet to discuss appropriate modifications to the System Budget, and neither Party shall unreasonably refuse to modify the System Budget as necessary to complete the development and construction of the System. C. The Water District's Plannina. Design and Construction Obligations. 11. Day-to-Day Management. The Water District shall provide day-to-day management of the planning, design and construction of the System, subject to the direction and oversight of the Joint Cooperative Committee, the Governing Boards, and the General Managers in accordance with this Agreement. The Water District shall serve as the contracting authority for the Parties for the System and contract directly with all professionals, construction firms and other outside contractors. The Water District shall execute and administer the contracts for the System and make all payments thereunder subject to the terms and conditions herein. 12. System Employees. The Water District shall recruit, select, employ, and supervise all staff employees specifically retained to provide services for the planning, design and construction of the System, including but not limited to any temporary, part time or limited term employees. The Water District shall be considered the employer of any and all such employees. 13. Reimbursement and Grant Receipts. The Water District shall pay for consultants, contractors, and other System-related costs in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Water District shall provide documentation to the Sanitation District substantiating the System-related costs incurred by the Water District. The Water District shall receive all grant receipts and credit the System ledger for the grant receipts as they are received. The Water District shall invoice the Sanitation District and Sanitation District shall pay for fifty percent (50%)of the expended amount(the cost of outside services), less fifty percent (50%) of the grant receipts, and less the costs of 7 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11, 2002 the services provided by the Sanitation District (not including the costs of the Sanitation District employees). 14. Lands. Easements and Rightsof-Way. Under the Joint Cooperative Committee's direction, the Water District shall obtain all lands, easements and rights-of- way necessary for the System's construction and operation. 15. Permits and Approvals. Under the Joint Cooperative Committee's direction,the Water District shall obtain all permits and approvals necessary for the construction and operation of the System. All permits and approvals are to be held in the Water District's name. 16. Plans and Specifications. The Water District, under the direction of the Joint Cooperative Committee and in consultation with the Sanitation District, shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, the plans and specifications and the contract documents for all components of the System, and accomplish all other work necessary for the System's design and engineering. 17. Content of Contract Documents. Each set of contract documents for the System shall include, among other things, provisions requiring that the contractor do the following: (a) name the Water District and the Sanitation District as additional named insureds under any and all insurance policies required by the contract documents; (b) indemnify and hold harmless the Water District and the Sanitaton District for any and all injuries or damages caused by the contractor in connection with the construction of the System components; and (c) name the Water District as beneficiary under any contractor bonds required by the contract documents. Each set of contract documents for the Related Facilities shall include among-other things, provisions requiring that the contractor do the following: (d) name the Water District and the Sanitation District as additional named insureds under any and all insurance policies required by the contract documents; and (a) indemnify and hold harmless the Water District and the Sanitation District for any and all injuries or damages caused by the contractor in connection with the construction of the Related Facilities components. 8 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 18. Advertisement of Bids. Upon receiving the Joint Cooperative Committee's approval of the plans and specifications for a System component project, the Water District shall publicly advertise for construction bids for that project if required. 19. Construction Mananement/Acceptance. The Joint Cooperative Committee shall approve construction management services for each construction- project and the Water District shall contract for such services for each such project On - completion of construction for each System component project, such project shall be accepted by the Board of Directors of the Water District following a recommendation by the General Managers and the Joint Cooperative Committee that the component was constructed and completed in accordance with the applicable System Contract. 20. Reports and Budgets. During the design and construction of the System, the Joint Cooperative Committee shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, an annual report of the System's development costs on or before the first of March for each year. The Joint Cooperative Committee shall recommend to the Governing Boards adjustments to the System Budget. D. The Sanitation District's Planning, Design and Construction Obligations. 21. Payment of Invoices. Sanitation District shall have the right to review and confirm that invoices described in Section 13 of this Agreement are delivered in conformance with the terms of this Agreement. The Water District shall present a warrant register and backup invoices to the Sanitation District one day prior to the Water District's issuance of checks. The Sanitation District shall wire 50 percent (50%) of the value of the check to be issued the following day to the Water District. If during review of the warrant register the Sanitation District disputes any payment as not being in accordance with this Agreement, such disputes shall be resolved pursuant to Section 66. 22. Trickling Filter Upgrades. Concurrent with the construction of the System, the Sanitation District, at its sole cost and expense, shall rehabilitate its existing trickling filters to increase capacity and reliability by installing standby electrical power, new trickling filters and secondary clarifiers. 23. Ellis Avenue Pump Station Upgrades. Concurrent with construction of the System, the Sanitation District shall rehabilitate the Ellis Avenue Pump Station and related diversion facilities. 24. Reduction in Wastewater Supply. In the event significant wastewater supply changes occur as a result of insufficient volumes of wastewater being collected by the Sanitation District's system which individually or in sum result in a reduction of the waste water flow to the Sanitation District's Reclamation No. 1 to below one hundred and ten (110) mgd (excluding wastewater from the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line)the Parties may design and construct additional diversion facilities to increase or redirect wastewater deliveries to Reclamation Plant No. 1 upon mutual agreement as to 9 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 the facilities to be constructed and the appropriate sharing of costs. Any such additional facilities shall be owned by the Sanitation District. - 25. Lease of Prooertv. On or before March 1, 2003,the Parties shall enter into a lease ("Lease"), in a form that is mutually acceptable to the Parties, whereby the Sanitation District shall lease to the Water District the property described on Exhibit E attached hereto (the "Property"). During the term of the Lease, the Water District shall use the Property for System-related purposes. The rent under the Lease shall be one dollar($1.00) per year. The rent is set at the nominal sum of one dollar($1.00) per year because the Sanitation District will otherwise receive adequate and substantial consideration from the Water District under this Agreement. As the landlord and property owner, the Sanitation District shall assist the Water District in obtaining any permits or approvals that the Water District may seek from governmental agencies in connection with the construction and operation of the AWT Facilities, the influent screening facilities, the landscaping and associated piping on the Property. Upon the Water District's request, the Sanitation District shall file or cause to be filed any application, documentation or information necessary to obtain such permits or governmental approvals. 26. Grant of License to the Water District to Use an Entrance on the Sanitation District's Property. The Sanitation District hereby grants to the Water District, its employees, consultants, contractors, sub-contractors and designated agents and representatives, a license to enter upon, occupy, and use one of the Sanitation District's entrances, to be selected by the Sanitation District in its reasonable judgment, for employee access and deliveries associated with the System, including chemicals and other materials. In no event, however, shall access for construction workers be permitted at the Sanitation District's main entrance located on Ellis Avenue at the on/off ramps to the Interstate 405 freeway. The term of the license to use an entrance shall begin upon execution of this Agreement and continue until this Agreement expires or is terminated 27. Grant of License to the Water District for Temporary Construction Staaing Areas. The Sanitation District hereby grants to the Water District, its employees, consultants, contractors, sub-contractors and designated agents and representatives, a license to use temporary construction staging areas outside the Property as may be necessary for construction of the AWT Facilities, the influent screening facilities, landscaping and associated piping as long as these staging operations do not unreasonably interfere, in the Sanitation District's reasonable judgment, with the Sanitation District's operations. The term of the license for temporary construction staging areas shall begin upon execution of this Agreement and continue until the AWT Facilities, the influent screening facilities, landscaping and associated piping are constructed. Once the AWT Facilities, the influent screening facilities, landscaping and associated piping are constructed, the Water District shall remove or cause to be removed by its contractors all equipment and structures from the temporary staging areas and it shall no longer have access thereto. III. Operation and Maintenance. 10 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 A. The Water District's Operations and Maintenance Obligations. 28. Water District Operation and Maintenance. The Water District shall, at its sole cost and expense (except to the extent provided in Sections 29, 53, 58, 59, and 60), provide, or cause to be provided, all tools, equipment, vehicles, materials, supplies and qualified personnel necessary to operate and maintain the screening facilities located on Sanitation District property, feed pipelines to the AWT Facilities located on Sanitation District property, the AWT Facilities, the GWR Pipeline, the seawater barrier injection wells and all other System facilities constructed pursuant to this Agreement. The Water District shall collect and maintain operating fees and charges for these purposes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Water District shall not be obligated to operate and maintain the Sanitation District's trickling filters, Ellis Avenue Pump Station or related diversion facilities that may be upgraded or constructed pursuant to Sections 22 and/or 23 of this Agreement. 29. Acceptance of Specification Influent. At its sole cost (except to the extent provided this Section and in Sections 53, 58, 59, and 60), the Water District shall operate the AWT Facilities and the Green Acres Project. Beginning two years after the AWT Facilities become Operational, the Water District shall continuously operate the AWT Facilities and the Green Acres Project to collectively accept a minimum continuous flow (delivered at a uniform rate)of seven (7) mgd of Specification Influent, increasing to forty-four(44) mgd as follows: Operating Years Minimum Soecifcation Influent Flow 2 yrs. after System is 7 mgd. operational 2009 15 mgd. 2012 29 mgd. 2015 44 mgd. To the extent that the Sanitation District provides non-Specification Influent, the Water District will use its reasonable efforts to accept such non-Specification Influent, in which case the Sanitation District shall reimburse the Water District for all incremental costs incurred as a result of such influent being non-Specification Influent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Water District may reject non-Specification Influent if the Water District reasonably determines that: (1) such non-Specification Influent may cause substantial damage to the AWT Facilities, or(ii)it is unable to treat and dispose of such non-Specification Influent in compliance with applicable law. The Water District shall make every effort to operate the AWT Facilities without total shutdowns for maintenance. No total shutdown (excluding a shutdown mandated by a regulatory agency)of the AWT Facilities will be permitted without a 48-hour written notice to the Sanitation District and receipt of the Sanitation District's concurrence. In the event of a dispute, the Patties shall exercise the procedures described in Section 66. In the event the groundwater basin is unable to receive the Product Water from the treatment of Specification Influent, the Parties shall meet to determine other ways to _ provide the Sanitation District with an outlet for Its wastewater flows. 11 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement _ October 11,2002 30. Capability to Accept Peak Flows. Commencing six (6) months after the System becomes Operational, the Water District shall routinely operate all System components, and otherwise maintain all System components in a state of readiness, so the System will be able to accept Peak Flows of Specification Influent, and notwithstanding Section 29, the Water District shall accept Peak Flows of Specification Influent; provided, however, that commencing upon the earlier of(i)twelve (12) hours after the System commenced accepting Peak Flows of Specification Influent, and (ii)the - time at which the Sanitation District reduces the flow of Specification Influent to the System to below one hundred and four(104) mgd, the Water District shall not be obligated to accept Peak Flows for the subsequent seventy-two (72) hour period. The Sanitation District shall provide the Water District with prior notice of the Sanitation District's intent to send Peak Flows of Specification Influent to the Water District, which notice shall follow one of the formats described in Exhibit F. Once a year, upon one week's prior notice, the Sanitation District may request that the Water District test the System's capability to accept one hundred and twenty-eight(128) mgd of Specification Influent. Such test shall consist of running the System for eight (8) hours accepting an hourly equivalent of Specification Influent of one hundred and twenty-eight (128) mgd. The Sanitation District shall provide sufficient Specification Influent for the test and shall reimburse the Water District for the costs incurred as a result of the test. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Sanitation District agrees in advance in writing, the Water District may temporarily reduce the System's capability to accept Peak Flows of Specification Influent. The Sanitation District must approve in writing both the amount and duration of any such reduction in capability. 31. Electrical Power Supply. Throughout the life of the System, the Water District shall ensure a reliable source of electrical power to preclude disruption of System operations by securing and maintaining two independent 66-kV lines from Southern Califomia Edison, or an equivalent provider. 32. NPDES Permit. The Water District shall obtain and maintain a valid National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit authorizing the discharge of treated water from the System to the receiving waters of the State of California. The Water District shall, at its sole cost and expense, (a)defend any regulatory or citizen enforcement actions that may arise out of alleged violations of the NPDES permit caused by operation of the System, except to the extent such actions result from the receipt of non-Specification Influent from the Sanitation District and (b) pay any fines or civil penalties levied as a result of any such enforcement actions and/or any amounts tendered in settlement of such enforcement actions. To the extent such actions result from the receipt of non-Specification Influent from the Sanitation District, the Sanitation District shall, at its sole cost and expense, (a) defend such actions, and (b) pay any fines or penalties levied as a result of such actions and/or any amounts tendered in settlement of such actions. 33. Water Reclamation Permit. The Water District shall obtain and maintain a valid Water Reclamation Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board authorizing the treatment and reuse of the System's water. 12 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 34. System Emolovees. The Water District shall recruit, select, employ, and supervise all staff employees and/or contractors retained to provide services for the operation and maintenance of the System, including but not limited to any regular fulltime, temporary, part-time, or limited term employees. The Water District shall employ qualified staff and/or contractors to operate the System in accordance with Section 35. 35. Staffina Plan: Use of Contractors. The Water District has developed a staffing plan for the operation and maintenance of the System that describes the System's employees ("Staffing Plan") and provided a copy of the Staffing Plan to the Sanitation District. In recruiting, selecting, employing, and supervising staff employees and/or contractors for the operation and maintenance of the System, the Water District shall follow and implement the approved Staffing Plan, as approved by the Water District's Board of Directors. The Sanitation District shall have the right to review and approve any changes to the Staffing Plan that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the System's ability to accept Specification Influent in the amounts required by this Agreement. The Sanitation District must approve the use of contractors to operate any material portion of the System, including all performance criteria issued to such contractors. 36. Reoular Meetings. During operation of the System, supervisory personnel from both Parties shall meet regularly to review operational and maintenance issues. During the first two years after the System becomes Operational, these meetings shall occur at least monthly. Thereafter, the meetings shall occur at least quarterly. 37. System Modifications. During operation of the System, the Water District shall not modify, either temporarily or permanently, any aspect of the System that would impair the System's ability to accept Specification Influent in the amounts required by this Agreement. 38. Compliance with Laws. In operating, managing, maintaining and repairing the System's facilities, the Water District shall strictly comply with the requirements of all permits and licenses and all applicable federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations governing the operation and maintenance of the System. 39. Monthly and Annual Reports. The Water District shall submit to the Sanitation District all monthly reports prepared by the Water District summarizing the System's operation and maintenance activities. The Water District shall also submit to the Sanitation District all annual reports prepared by the Water District summarizing the System's operation and maintenance activities. The Water District shall also provide all other written reports prepared by the Water District regarding System management, operation, maintenance, asset management, and repair and long-term rehabilitation or replacement as the Sanitation District may reasonably request from time to time. 40. Annual Budgets. The Water District shall prepare and submit the annual budget for the System's operation and maintenance and capital expenditures prepared 13 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 by the Water District to the Sanitation District for review. The Water District shall submit the annual budget for review each year not later than sixty(60)days before the Water District's governing board approves the Water District's annual budget. 41. Accounting. The Water District shall prepare and maintain accurate and complete books and accounting records for operation of the System in accordance with practices established by or consistent with those utilized by the Controller of the State of California for public agencies. Such books and accounts shall be maintained on the basis of a "fiscal year". The Water District shall provide to the Sanitation District annual accounting reports with respect to the System prepared by the Water District. The Sanitation District shall have the right to audit such books and accounts at any reasonable time at their sole expense. 42. Records and Reports. The Water District shall prepare and maintain accurate and complete records of all materials provided and services performed in connection with the operation and maintenance of the System. The Sanitation District shall have the right to inspect and copy all records of the Water District pertaining to all materials provided and services performed in connection with the operations and maintenance of the System during regular business hours on reasonable notice at the Sanitation District's sole expense. 43. Regulatory Reporting. The Water District shall have sole responsibility for preparing and filing all reports in connection with the System that may be required by applicable laws and/or regulatory agencies. The Sanitation District shall provide such information as necessary for the preparation of such reports as may be reasonably requested by the Water District. 44. Annual Independent Audit. Either Party may request, no more than once a year, an independent auditor or a team of Sanitation District and Water District supervisors to perform an audit of the System's operations. The purpose of the audit is to assure the long-term adequacy of the System. Each Party shall pay for one-half of the cost of any such audit. 45. Insurance. Each Party shall furnish and maintain the following insurance coverage, provided that such coverage is available on commercially reasonable terms: (a)Workers' Compensation In accordance with the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of California —Minimum of$1,000,000 (b) Public Liability, in the form of $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit either Comprehensive General per occurrence, with $5,000,000 Liability or Commercial Liability aggregate for bodily injury, death and written on a per-occurrence property damage basis 14 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11, 2002 (c)Automobile Liability, $1,000,000 combined single limit per including non-owned and hired occurrence vehicles Each Party shall name the other Party as an additional named insured on all of the above listed policies (other than Worker's Compensation). Each Party shall furnish certificates of insurance showing coverage to the other Party. Where a Party, by its Board of Directors approval, has elected to partially or fully self-insure any of the above required coverages, it shall provide to the other Party all the relevant written policies and actions to establish said programs. 46. Reclaimed Water Service To The Sanitation District. The Water District may deliver Reclaimed Water to the Sanitation District on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, provided however, that the Water District is not obligated to deliver any specific quantity of Reclaimed Water to the Sanitation District. 46.1 Cost of Reclaimed Water. During the period of July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002 the Sanitation District has paid to the Water District one hundred and fifty dollars ($150) per acre-foot for Reclaimed Water that the Water District delivers to the Sanitation District. This rate shall be adjusted as of June 30, 2002 and annually thereafter by the lower of(i)the change in the U. S. Consumer Price Index for Los Angeles— Riverside— Orange County for the preceding year or(ii) 2.5%. 46.2 Quality of Reclaimed Water. Subject to Section 54, the Reclaimed Water to be provided to the Sanitation District by the Water District shall meet the Reclaimed Water Standards and shall be reclaimed by tertiary treatment or other effective disinfection treatment that is acceptable to both of the Parties. 46.3 Minimum Delivery of Project Reclaimed Water. Until January 15, 2012, the Water District may deliver, and the Sanitation District shall accept if delivered, Reclaimed Water on a continuous basis of not less than 4.2 mgd average, calculated on a yearly basis. Water District shall deliver Reclaimed Water to the Sanitation District at a pressure of no less than 105 pounds per square inch (105 psi). Sanitation District warrants that flow demand requirements shall be a minimum of 1000 gpm daily average and not exceed an instantaneous combined maximum flow for the Sanitation District's Reclamation Plants 1 and 2 of 3500 gallons per minute (5 mgd). The Water District, with thirty (30) minutes advance notice to the Sanitation District, may suspend deliveries to the Sanitation District if the secondary effluent from the Sanitation District does not meet the requirements for Specification Influent. The Water District may resume deliveries when the secondary effluent meets the requirements for Specification Influent for a period of at least two (2) hours. After January 15, 2012, the minimum average daily requirement shall no longer apply. 46.4 Ownership of Green Acres Project Reclaimed Water Facilities. Sanitation District shall own, operate and maintain at its awn expense all wastewater treatment facilities that lie within the boundaries of its two plants, specifically excluding the Water District's pump station at Plant No. 1 and metering facilities at Sanitation District's Plant No. 2. Water District shall own, operate and maintain at its own expense 15 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement _ October 11,2002 all other reclaimed water facilities that are part of the Green Acres Project. Sanitation District shall, on behalf of the Water District, be responsible to operate and maintain the reclaimed water service pipeline and its appurtenances that lie within the right-of-way of the-Sanitation District's interplant utility corridor. Sanitation District shall be reimbursed by Water District for costs incurred for operating and maintaining the pipeline. 47. Quality of Reclamation Plant Waste. Subject to Section 54, the Water District warrants that the quality of waste stream discharge from the AWT Facilities and the Green Acres Project reclamation plant shall conform to all of the Sanitation District's current and future water quality standards and regulations. 48. Discharoe of Excess Reclaimed Water. Until January, 2012, during certain winter months, Water District will have excess Reclaimed Water for discharge into the Sanitation District's ocean outfall, as a condition of the Water District's "Basic Integrated Reuse Project Agreement," dated July 17, 1996, with Irvine Ranch Water District ("IRW D") and City of Newport Beach. The discharge may be up to four(4) million gallons per day. The cost of constructing the discharge pipeline connecting to the ocean outfall, the cost of metering facilities, the cost of monitoring, and the unit cost for discharge to the outfall shall be bome as agreed pursuant to the Agreement for Operation of Green Acres Project Intertie and Outfall Connection, dated April 15, 1998, by and among the Sanitation District, the Water District, IRW D and the City of Newport Beach. 49. Metering. Measurement of Flows and Invoices. Sanitation District agrees that at the Sanitation District's locations where Reclaimed Water is used exclusively, the Water District, at its own expense, shall provide a control valve (or valves) and a meter for the purpose of measuring the quantity of Reclaimed Water delivered under the terms of this Agreement. Sanitation District acknowledges and agrees that the Water District may read the Reclaimed Water service meter(s) and record Reclaimed Water usage for Sanitation District on a monthly basis. Sanitation District shall provide all necessary assistance to the Water District in gaining access to the service meter(s)to take readings. Sanitation District shall pay promptly on receipt (in accordance with its regular payment practices) all invoices or water billings received from the Water District for Reclaimed Water service. The Water District shall pay the City of Fountain Valley and/or Huntington Beach any meter reading charges mandated by either City. 50. Water Quality Monitoring. The Water District shall establish, implement and maintain a water quality monitoring program for the following: (a)the wastewater delivered from the Sanitation District to the Water District pursuant to Section 54 of this Agreement; (b) the waste streams discharged from the AWT Facilities and the Green Acres Project and delivered to the Sanitation District pursuant to Section 56 of this Agreement; and (c) the Reclaimed Water that the Water District will deliver to the Sanitation District pursuant to Section 46 of this Agreement. The monitoring program shall include daily turbidity samples for all brine wastes. 51. Independent Contractor Status. The Parties agree that, in operating and maintaining the System, the Water District is, and shall be, acting at all times as an 16 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 independent contractor, and all employees of the Water District are solely employees of the Water District and not the agents or employees of the Sanitation District. The Parties further agree that, in operating and maintaining the facilities to provide Specification Influent to the System, the Sanitation District Is, and shall be, acting at all times as an independent contractor, and all employees of the Sanitation District are solely employees of the Sanitation District and not the agents or employees of the Water District. 52. Costs of Addressing Newly Discovered Contaminants. Notwithstanding the Sanitation District's obligation to deliver Specification Influent to the Water District at the Sanitation District's sole cost as described below in Section 54,the Water District shall pay fifty percent (50%)of any operation and maintenance and/or capital costs, in excess of the costs of regular disinfection, that may be necessary to remove n- nitrosodimethylamine ("NDMA"), 1,4 Dioxane and any Newly Discovered Contaminants from wastewater to be provided to the Water District under this Agreement. The Parties shall meet to determine the most effective method of addressing such contaminants. If the Parties cannot agree, any dispute will be resolved pursuant to Section 66. 53. Other Costs. In the event that new quality or quantity discharge requirements are imposed by law or regulation that increase the cost to either Party to perform its obligations under this Agreement,the Parties shall meet to determine the most effective method of addressing such requirements. If the Parties cannot agree, any dispute will be resolved pursuant to Section 66. The cost of addressing such requirements shall be shared equally by the Parties. B. The Sanitation District's Operations and Maintenance Obligations. 54. Delivery and Quality of Wastewater. The Sanitation District shall make Specification Influent available from the Sanitation Districts Reclamation Plant No. 1 to the Water District for the System and Green Acres Project. Until such time as the System is Operational, the Sanitation District shall make available to the Water District nine (9) mgd of Specification Influent for the Green Acres Project and seven (7)mgd of Specification Influent for Water Factory 21. Thereafter, the Sanitation District shall make Spec;1fication Influent available in accordance with the table below. Anticipated Source of Normal Operation Peak Flow Plant No. 1 Secondary (includes Green Acres Project) Conditions Treated Wastewater Activated Sludge Plant: 80 mad Up to 80 mgd Trickling Filters: 24 mgd Up to 48 an d Total: 104 mgd Total: Up to 128 mgd 17 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 The Sanitation District shall use all reasonable efforts to direct the highest quality wastewater to the Sanitation District's Plant No. 1 for treatment and transmission to the System, bypassing lower quality wastewater where possible to the Sanitation's District Plant No. 2. The Sanitation District shall not use wastewater from the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line as source water for the System. The "quality" of wastewater _ for purposes of this section is based on those factors that adversely affect the performance of the System or Green Acres Project, such as total dissolved solids. The Sanitation District shall confer with the Water District if the Sanitation District intends to make a major change in the source of wastewater, future planning, operations or chemical use for Plant No. 1 at least thirty (30)days before such a change. Nothing in this paragraph shall alter the Sanitation District's obligation to provide Specification Influent in the quantities described above. 55. Industrial Pretreatment and Pollution Source Control Program. The Sanitation District shall maintain a comprehensive industrial wastewater pretreatment and pollutant source control program for controlling the discharge of wastes from point sources that could adversely affect the System's water quality or production. The Sanitation District shall comply with all applicable legal requirements with respect to its source water control program. 56. Acceptance of Waste Streams to be Discharged to the Sanitation District . The Sanitation District shall, at no charge to the Water District, accept waste streams discharged from the AWT Facilities (or from Water Factory 21, prior to the System becoming Operational) and the Green Acres Project according to the following capacities: Waste Reject Stream Normal Operation Peak Flow Includes Green Acres Proleol Conditions Microfiltration Return Up to 12 mgd Up to 24 mgd Brine o Ouffall Up to 17.5 an d Up to 17.5 an d Green Acres Project Return Up to 1.5 mgd Up to 1.5 mgd' ' GAP return maybe zero because GAP plant is anticipated to be out-of-service during the winter. In addition, the Sanitation District shall accept"start-up"water generated by the AWT Facilities and periodic well "regeneration water'. Start-up shall be closely coordinated with the Sanitation District to prevent plant disruptions. Well regeneration water shall _ not be delivered during anticipated peak flow events. 18 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 57. Further Conditioning or Treatment of Waste Streams to be Discharged to the Sanitation District. If the Sanitation District's outfall NPDES permit requires conditioning or further treatment of waste streams accepted from the Water District by the Sanitation District pursuant to Section 56 before it can be discharged to the Sanitation District's outfall, (a)the Parties shall each pay fifty percent(50%) of the capital costs of any system or equipment necessary to perform such conditioning or further treatment, and (b)the Sanitation District shall pay all operation and maintenance costs of such conditioning or further treatment. 58. Costs of Specification Influent. Except to the extent provided in Sections 52 and 53, the Sanitation District shall pay all operations and maintenance costs of providing Specification Influent as described in Section 54 of this Agreement. The Sanitation District shall reimburse the Water District for all incremental operations and maintenance costs of treating Peak Flows of Specification Influent to meet the System Effluent Standards. 59. Cost of Peak Flow Treatment . The Sanitation District shall reimburse the Water District for all incremental operations and maintenance costs of treating Peak Flows of Specification Influent by paying the Water District$325 / million gallons for such treatment (the Peak Flow Rate"). The Parties acknowledge that the Peak Flow Rate described above is an estimate of the incremental operations and maintenance costs of treating Peak Flows under the two alternative methods. Therefore, upon the request of either Party, the Parties shall make an appropriate adjustment to the Peak Flow Rate to reflect changes in the actual cost of electricity, chemicals, labor and equipment replenishment and refurbishment from the following assumptions of the per unit cost of such items in treating Peak Flows: Unit Cost Electric' $80 / million gallons Chemicals $75/ million gallons Labor $120 / million gallons Replenishment and $50 / million gallons Refurbishment 60. Costs of Addressing Newly Discovered Contaminants. Notwithstanding the Water District's obligation to operate and maintain the System at its sole cost as described above in Sections 28 and 29, the Sanitation District shall pay fifty percent (50%)of any operation, maintenance and /or capital costs, in excess of the costs of _ regular disinfection, that may be needed to remove n-nitrosodimethylamine ("NOMA"), 19 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement - October 11,2002 1.4 Dioxane and any Newly Discovered Contaminants from the wastewater provided to the Water District pursuant to this Agreement. 61. Compliance with Laws. In operating, managing, maintaining and repairing the facilities to provide Specification Influent to the Water District, the Sanitation District shall strictly comply with the requirements of all permits and licenses and all applicable federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations goveming the operation and maintenance of such facilities. IV. Term and Termination. 62. Term. This Agreement shall remain in force and effect for thirty(30) years after the date the System becomes Operational (the "Start Date ). Within thirty (30) days after the twentieth (20"') anniversary of the Start Date, the Parties shall jointly assess the condition of the System. Within thirty(30) days after the twenty-fifth (25") anniversary of the Start Date, the Parties shall meet to decide whether to extend this Agreement. Any extension of this Agreement shall be done on mutually-acceptable terms and conditions. In the event the Parties do not extend the Agreement, the Water District shall, under the direction of the Joint Cooperative Committee, sell off or liquidate the System and all facilities and appurtenances thereto. The Water District shall also remove all System facilities constructed on the Sanitation District's property. The proceeds of selling off or liquidating the System shall be used first to repay the Water District for all reasonable third party costs incurred in connection with the selling and/or moving the System facilities. The remainder, if any, shall be divided equally between the Parties. V. Events of Default: Dispute Resolution. 63. Event of Default. The failure of a Party to comply with any provision of this Agreement that has a material and adverse effect on the other Party, except to the extent caused by a breach of this Agreement by the other Party, shall constitute an Event of Default under this Agreement; provided, however, that the defaulting Party shall first have a period of thirty(30)days following receipt of notice from the other Party of such failure to comply to cure such failure, or if such cure cannot be effected within such thirty (30)day period, such period shall extend for a total of one hundred eighty (180)days, so long as the defaulting Party is diligently trying to cure such failure throughout such period. 64. Consequence of Water District Default. Upon the occurrence of a Water District Event of Default arising out of a breach of Section 29 or 30 as a result of the Water District abandoning the operation of the System that has not been cured in accordance with Section 63, and if the Parties are unable to agree upon another way to provide the Sanitation District with an outlet for its wastewater flows, the Sanitation District may elect to terminate this Agreement, acquire the AWT Facilities from the Water District for one dollar($1) and assume the right and responsibility to operate and maintain the AWT Facilities. In this event,Water District shall, for what would have been the remaining regular term of this Agreement, reimburse Sanitation District for the reasonable cost of operation and maintenance of the AWT Facilities to treat to the 20 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 System Effluent Standards the minimum amount of Specification Influent for which the Water District would have had the responsibility to treat at its cost pursuant to this Agreement. Upon the occurrence of any other Water District Event of Default that has notbeen cured in accordance with Section 63, the Sanitation District may pursue all legal and equitable remedies that may be available. 65. Consequence of Sanitation District Default. Upon the occurrence of a Sanitation District Event of Default arising out of a breach of Section 54, Sanitation District shall pay for imported water to maintain the Seawater Barrier to the extent the duration of such non-compliance extends beyond thirty(30) days. Upon a Sanitation District Event of Default arising out of an intentional breach of its obligation to make Specification Influent available in the quantity set forth in Section 54, the Sanitation District shall pay for an amount of imported water equal to the average annual amount of Product Water produced by the System over the previous five (5)year period (or if the System has been Operational for less than five (5) years, over the period of the System's operation). The Sanitation District's obligation to pay for imported water shall expire upon the earlier of(i)the end of regular term of this Agreement and (ii)the cure of the Sanitation District's breach. The added cost of imported water shall be calculated as the cost of imported water less the avoided operating and maintenance charges of producing the water through the System. Upon the occurrence of any Sanitation District Event of Default that has not been cured in accordance with Section 63, the Water District may pursue all legal and equitable remedies that may be available. 66. Dispute Resolution. Staffs of both Parties shall meet and use their best efforts to settle any dispute, claim, question or disagreement (a "Dispute")arising from or relating to this Agreement. To that end, staffs of both Parties shall consult and negotiate with each other in good faith and, recognizing their mutual interests, attempt to reach a just and equitable solution satisfactory to both Parties. If the Parties do not reach such a solution within a period of thirty (30) days after the first meeting of the staff regarding a Dispute, then the Parties shall convene a meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee within sixty (60) days after the first meeting of the staff regarding a Dispute and attempt to settle the Dispute before the Joint Cooperative Committee at the meeting. If the Parties do not settle the Dispute within five (5)calendar days after the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting, either Party may pursue any and all legal and equitable remedies that may be available. VI. Miscellaneous. 67. Joint'C000erative Committee Review of Operations. The Parties shall convene the Joint Cooperative Committee annually to review and assess the System's technical and financial operations. The Joint Cooperative Committee shall make any recommendations regarding System operations to the respective governing boards of the Water District and the Sanitation District that it deems appropriate. 66. Force Maieure. Neither Party shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations (other than payment obligations) under this Agreement is caused by floods, earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, actions of legislative,judicial, executive or regulatory 21 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 government bodies or other cause, without fault and beyond the reasonable control of such Party. If any such events shall occur, the time for performance by either Party of any of its obligations hereunder shall be extended by the Parties for the period of time that such events prevented such performance. Upon the occurrence of an event of Force Majeure, the affected Party shall: (i) promptly notify the other Party of such Force Majeure event, (ii) provide reasonable details relating to such Force Majeure event and (lii) implement mitigation measures to the extent commercially reasonable. 69. Indemnities. 69.1 The Sanitation District's Indemnity . The Sanitation District shall fully indemnify the Water District and its respective directors, Joint Cooperative Committee members, employees and agents against, and hold completely free and harmless from, any cost, expense, claim, demand,judgment, loss, injury and/or liability of any kind or nature, including personal or bodily injury, death or property damage ("Losses"), that may arise from (i) any grossly negligent act or omission of the Sanitation District related to construction of the System or the construction and operation of the facilities used to provide Specification Influent to the Water District or(ii) any claim made by a Sanitation District employee specifically retained to provide services with respect to the facilities used to provide Specification Influent. 69.2 The Water District's Indemnity. The Water District shall fully indemnify the Sanitation District and its respective directors, Joint Cooperative Committee members, employees and agents against, and hold completely free and harmless from, any Losses, that may arise from (i) any grossly negligent act or omission of the Water District related to the System's construction, management, operation, maintenance or repair, except for costs, expenses, claims, demands,judgments, losses, injuries and/or liability arising from any grossly negligent act or omission of the Sanitation District related to construction of the System or(ii) any claim made by a Water District employee specifically retained to provide services with respect to the System. 69.3 Joint Indemnity. Except as provided in Sections 69.1 and 69.2, each Party shall indemnify the other Party and its respective directors, Joint Cooperative Committee members, employees and agents against, and hold completely free and harmless from, any Losses (including liabilities under the System Contracts and contracts for the Related Facilities, as applicable) arising from the design and construction of facilities pursuant to this Agreement; provided however that such indemnity shall be made only to the extent necessary to allocate such Loss between the Parties in a proportion equal to the Parties' cost-sharing obligations under this Agreement with respect to the design and construction of the facilities out of which such Loss arose. 70. Notices. All notices to the Sanitation District required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered (i)when delivered in person, (ii) on the third day after mailing, if mailed, postage prepaid, by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested); (III)on the day after mailing if sent by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service which maintains records of the time, place, and recipient of delivery; (iv) upon receipt of a confirmed transmission, if sent by 22 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 telex, telecopy or facsimile transmission; or(v)via electronic mail provided the senders system is capable of creating a written record of such notice and its receipt in each case_ to the parties at the following addresses or to other such addresses as may be furnished in writing by one party to the other: Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Teleoopier: 714-962-0356 E-Mail: banderson@ocsd.com Attention: General Manager With a copy to: District General Counsel, who is presently: Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq. Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart 701 South Parker Street, Suite 8000 Orange, CA 92868 Telecopier. 714-835-7787 E-Mail: dw@wss-law.com All notices to the Water District required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered (i)when delivered in person, (ii) on the third day after mailing, if mailed, postage prepaid, by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested); (iii)on the day after mailing if sent by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service which maintains records of the time, place, and recipient of delivery; (iv) upon receipt of a confirmed transmission, if sent by telex, telecopy or facsimile transmission; or(v) via electronic mail provided the sender's system is capable of creating a written record of such notice and its receipt in each case to the parties at the following addresses or to other such addresses as may be furnished in writing by one party to the other: Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Telecopier. 714-378-3371 E-Mail: vgrebbien@ocwd.com Attention: General Manager 23 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 With a copy to: District General Counsel, who is presently: Clark Ide, Esq. General Counsel Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Telecopier: 714-378-3371 E-Mail: cide@ocwd.com 71. Successors And Assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, representatives, successors and permitted assigns. 72. Further Acts and Assurances. The Parties agree to execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all additional papers, documents and other assurances, and shall perform any and all acts and things reasonably necessary, in connection with the performance of the obligations hereunder and to carry out the intent of the Parties. 73. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are inserted only as a matter of convenience and reference and in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement nor in any way affects this Agreement. Words of any gender in this Agreement shall be held to include any other gender and words in the singular number shall be held to include the plural when the sense so requires. 74. Severability. Should it be found that any part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable, such part or parts of this Agreement shall be of no force nor effect and this Agreement shall be treated as if such part or parts had not been inserted. 75. Entire Agreement. All previous negotiations had between the Parties hereto and/or their agents or representatives with respect to this Agreement are merged herein and this Agreement alone fully and completely expresses the Parties' rights and obligations. 76. Modifications In Writing. This Agreement shall not be modified in any manner except by an instrument in writing executed by the Parties or their respective successors in interest. 77. Interpretation. Each of the Parties hereby waives any provisions of law to the effect that an ambiguity in a contract or agreement should be interpreted against the Party that drafted the contract, agreement or instrument. 24 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 78. Governing Law. This Contract shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of California. 79. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create any third-party beneficiaries to the Agreement, and no person or entity other than the Parties, and the permitted successors and assigns of either of them, shall be authorized to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. 80. Assignment. Neither Party may assign its interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party. 81. Representation and Warranties. No representations or warranties are made or have been relied upon by either Party other than those expressly set forth herein, if any. 25 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT By: Chair, Board of Directors Date: By: Secretary, Board of Directors Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Thomas L. Woodruff District Counsel Orange County Sanitation District ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT By: President, Board of Directors Date: By: General Manager Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Clark Ida General Counsel Orange County Water District 26 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11, 2002 Exhibit A Definitions 1. "AWT Facilities" means the advanced wastewater treatment facilities to be constructed by the Parties on the Water District's and Sanitation District's property in Fountain Valley. 2. "Cooperative Agreement" means the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for Orange County Reclamation Project, entered into by the Parties in February of 1997. 3. "Effective Date" means the date of this Agreement. 4. "General Managers" means the general managers of the Water District and the Sanitation District. 5. "Governing Boards" means the Board of Directors of the Water District and the Board of Directors of the Sanitation District. 6. "Green Acres Project" means the Water District's Green Acres wastewater reclamation facility. 7. "Groundwater Replenishment System" or"System" means the system more specifically describe in Exhibit B. 8. "GWR Pipeline" means the pipeline to be constructed to convey Product Water from Fountain Valley to the Water District's spreading basins. 9. "Joint Cooperative Committee" means the Joint Cooperative Committee previously established under the Cooperative Agreement and continued under this Agreement. 10. "NTU" means nephelometric turbidity unit, as defined in the latest issue of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water &Wastewater as published by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water Environment Federation. 11. "Newly Discovered Contaminants" is defined as contaminants found in wastewater that are or could be introduced into the Orange County Groundwater Basin through the System, that are not currently identified in any of the Water District's wells above any federal or state action level, and that either(1) are assigned a new drinking water action level, by federal or state regulators after the effective date of this Agreement, or (2) are newly discovered in the System's wastewater or product water through new testing methods that only become available after the effective date of this Agreement. 12. "Operational" is defined as the condition whereby the System has been installed 27 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 and tested, and startup activities have been completed, such that the System is ready to process Specification Influent. Following attainment of Operational status, the System general contractor may have ancillary and non-critical construction yet to complete (e.g. landscaping, subsequent demolition). The Water District shall notify the Sanitation District when the System is Operational. 13. "Peak Flows"shall mean flows of Specification Influent accepted by the System in excess of the one hundred and four(104) mgd up to a maximum one hundred and twenty eight (128) mgd. 14. "Product Water" means water produced by the AWT Facilities. 15. "Reclaimed Water" means water meeting the Reclaimed Water Standards. 16. "Reclaimed Water Standards" means recycled water meeting the latest adopted version of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3 entitled "Water Recycling Criteria" as set forth in Section 60304 with respect to filter effluent. 17. 'Related Facilities" means the upgrades to the trickling filters and Ellis Avenue Pump Station and related diversion facilities be completed by the Sanitation District pursuant to this Agreement. 18. "Specification Influent" means secondary treated sewage that (i) complies with the the latest adopted version of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3 entitled 'Water Recycling Criteria" and (ii) has a turbidity that does not exceed (A)five (5) NTU on average when measured over the previous thirty (30) days or(B)ten (10) NTU on an instantaneous basis (in each case measured pursuant to the requirements of Section 60301.630 of Title 22). In cases of conflict between these criteria, the more restrictive numbers shall apply. 19. "System" means the Groundwater Replenishment System, the components of which are described on Exhibit B. 20. "System Budget" means the budget adopted by the Parties pursuant to Section 10. 21. "System Contracts" means all contracts and change orders necessary for planning, design and construction of the System, including professional service contracts, construction contracts and other contracts. 22. "System Effluent Standards" means the treatment standards to permit Product Water to be discharged into Santa Ana River as set forth in the NPDES Permit for the System. 23. "Wastewater Utilization Agreement" means that certain Second Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization of Reclaimed Wastewater, entered into 28 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 between the Parties on January 15, 1997. 29 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 Exhibit B Groundwater Replenishment System Description The project will consist of three major components: (1) AWT Facilities and pumping stations, (2) a pipeline to recharge facilities, and (3) a pipeline and the injection wells for the barrier. Highly treated wastewater (secondary effluent)that would normally be discharged to the ocean will be pumped from the Sanitation District Reclamation Plant No. 1 to the GW R System AWT Facilities where it will be treated to drinking water standards, using membrane and disinfection processes. Depending upon specific seasonal demands, recycled water will be pumped to an existing recharge basin in Anaheim and to the seawater intrusion barrier in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. The System will produce approximately 72,000 afy. Future phases will be implemented as anticipated demands for recycled water are realized. 1, AWT Facilities Influent Diversion Source water will be secondary effluent diverted from the Sanitation District's Plant No. 1 to the GWR System AWT Facilities. Influent source water will flow through fine-mesh screens or strainers, and a large diameter pipeline to the AWT Facilities. Microfiltration • Microfiltration (MF) will be used as a pretreatment process ahead of the reverse osmosis (RO) process. All influent (secondary effluent)flows pass through miroporous membranes to remove bacteria and suspended solids. • The capacity of the MF will be 86 mgd (normal flow) and 112 mgd (peak flow). • The MF will consist of a submersible vacuum pressure driven system. • The MF operates at approximately 90% recovery. The waste stream, or backwash, will return to the Sanitation District's Plant No. 1. Reverse Osmosis • The RO process will be designed to produce 70 mgd. The RO system will treat MF filtrate and is designed to operate at approximately 85%. • Peak flows beyond the 70 mgd RO capacity will bypass the RO system for non- reuse discharge to the Santa Ana River. • The waste stream from the RO process, brine, will be discharged to the Sanitation District's ocean outfall. 30 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 Ultraviolet Light Disinfection and Treatment • Ultraviolet (UV) light will be used for disinfection and destruction of Nitrogen- nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA)for the System. • UV will treat 70 mgd of RO permeate for disinfection/organic destruction. • UV will disinfect 70 mgd (normal flow) and 100 mgd (peak flow). Post-treatment • Post-treatment will feature decarbonators and lime addition. To protect the downstream pipelines, a portion of the RO permeate will pass through decarbonator towers to remove excess carbon dioxide. Lime will be added to stabilize the final product water. Spreading Basin Pump Station and Barrier Water Pump Station Two pump stations will discharge final product, or recycled water to the recharge basins in Anaheim and to the seawater barrier in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. Standby pumps will be provided for redundancy. • The peak capacity of the Spreading Basin Pump Station will be about 55 mgd. The peak capacity of the Barrier Water Pump Station will be about 42 mgd. • Both pump stations will be expandable to accommodate future project phase. 2. The GWR Pipeline • The pipeline from the AWT Facilities to the recharge facilities will be 60 to 78 inches in diameter and approximately 14 miles long. • The pipeline will exit the south side of the AWT Facilities site at Garfield Avenue and travel directly east to the Santa Ana River. At that point, it will follow an alignment along the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River from Fountain Valley to Anaheim. From the Santa Ana River, the pipeline will extend along the Carbon Creek Canyon Diversion Channel to Kraemer Basin, one of the Water District's existing spreading basins. • A standby turnout and pipeline will be provided for discharge to Miller Basin, which is adjacent to Kraemer Basin. 3. Barrier Pipeline and Injection Wells 31 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11, 2002 • The barrier supply pipeline will be extended to serve eight new injection wells. The existing barrier pipeline will be extended to the west along Ellis Avenue and from the AWT Facilities site south in Ward Street to the Santa Ana River, then south along the river to near Adams Avenue. Four new injection well sites will be added west of Newland Street along Ellis Avenue. Another four new injection wells will be added along the west bank of the Santa Ana River, just north of Adams Avenue. Phasing and Recycled Water Production The total recycled water production for each component is shown in Table 1. Phasing will be determined by project flow requirements for anticipated water demands for three types of reuse: recharge, seawater intrusion barrier, and supplemental water for the Green Acres Project. The System will produce recycled water for spreading and barrier uses. Table 1 Water Production Estimated Water Production a Tvpe of Use I Total Barrier I Recharge 35,000 137,000 172,000 A portion of water produced for recharge maybe available for other uses (such as supplementing the Green Acres Project) in future phases. 32 Groundwater Replenishment System Development Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 Exhibit C Groundwater Replenishment System Cost Allocation and Related Facilities GWR Component Cost Allocation (%) Water Sanitation District District 1. System 50 50 2. Ellis Avenue Pump Station and Diversion 0 100 Facilities Upgrades 3. Trickling Filter Upgrades 0 100 4. Land Easements and Rights of Way 100 10 33 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 Exhibit D System Budget GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM ESTIMATED COST OF WATER($per Acre-Ft) AUG.2002 AVERAGE Annual Water Production AFY 72,000 Escalation to Midpoint of Construction varies See breakdown Construction Contingency varies See breakdown ELA percent Input value ELA Contingency percent 2% Power $/kWh 0.0575 Rate Grants(to be received after 3/28/01) million $ 89.79 OCSD Contribution percent 50 SRF Loan Interest Rate percent 2.6 SRF Loan Time Period years 22.5 Other Loan Interest Rate percent 4.0 Other Loan Time Period years 30 CaDacky Au .2002 FACILITY m d $,millions Construction Cost Estimate (Includes 5% construction contingency-no sacs atlon) FacilitylContract Title AWT Facilities $ 280.800.000 Barrier Facilities $ 14,000,000 GWR Pipeline $ 71,000,000 OCIP $ 6.000.000 Total Construction $ 371,800,000 Total ELA $ 64,700,000 TOTAL CAPITAL COST 1 $ 426,$00`000 Less Grants $ 89,790,238 TOTAL NET CAPITAL COST $ 33.6,709,782 Less OCSD Contribution $ 169,354,981 Net OCWD Capital Cost $ 188,354,881 34 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2002 Amortized OCWD Capital Cost($mill ) $9,674,206 Annual O&M Cost($millyr) Power 70 $ - 6.625,000 Contract Maintenance 70 $ 356,000 Chemicals 70 $ 4.626,000 - Maintenance 70 $ 2,610,000 Membrane Replacement 70 $ 2,770,000 Lamp Replacement 70 $ 240,000 Landscaping/Housekeeping 70 $ 50,000 Compliance 70 $ 1,500,000 Labor 70 $ 3,028,740 Total Annual OW Cost $mill y r $ 11,905,740 Total OCWD Annual Cost($mill $31,479,946 Unit OCWD Capital Cost($lat) 134 Unit OCWD O&M Cost($/so 303 Total OCWD Unit Cost Slat) 437 35 Groundwater Replenishment System Development,Operation and Maintenance Agreement October l 1,2002 Exhibit E Leased Property Description EXHIBIT El ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2 IN THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE. OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I RECORDED FEBRUARY 23, 1967 IN BOOK 8183.PAGE 28,OF OFFICIAL.RECORDS,IN THE OFFICE OP THE COUNTY RECORDIB OF SAID COUNTY AND THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL JUDGMENT tN CONDEMNATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DrSTRICr NO. I RECORDED FEBRUARY 7, 1961 IN BOOK 5622, PAGE 146, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN TILE OFFTCE OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING A'I'THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 ALSO BEING THE NORTEWPST CORNER OE SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE SOUTH 89°34.21" EAST 90.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4;THENCE SOUTH O°D6'14"WEST 432.04 FEET; THENCE WEST 67051 FEET TO A POINT, SAID-POINT BEING ON 'FHH EAST LINE OF THE EAS04ENTTO THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, L5.00 FW1`IN WIDTH,RECORDED IN JULY 30. 1954 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 84-313034.OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER,SATD EAST LINE BEING PARALLEL 1 c, WITH AND 40.00 FEET EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF WARD STREET; THENCE. NORTH 0'06'27- EAST 437.04 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAM EASEMENT TO A POINT,SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE SOUTH 89"34'21"EAST 620.49 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE. Of SAID PARCEL 2 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE AREA OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL IS 6.69 ACRES.MORE OR LESS. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT'B'ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. ' i Eq.Hd1aR S I elaT� f � p 0 q-it-o2 36 Groundwater Replenishment System Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement October 11,2M EXHIBIT E2 4Ftrx to�¢mw+r urx o�� ORO" coven sumOM MWW or SMWiIC rAFiF: SCUM FM 2 OP.AMF cns;r R: Ea T nerxtfw 1 WN21 W s10.w' MW ,,• ti: O I f Y s ac Fi ir [.f • s .: c. .• vt w1 I I ••K F4tE • 4 67QSt•` �. (.: 25 � E19 LINE OF 75' WqE EGG to CITY OF F"UW VALLEY PER o.R 64-JIMM v'' ao S A. Fq a V. 7M 715r ♦ i �7 1� or CW AREA - 6.69 ACAES U SiNL i•.>m' 9-11-01 CSDAWIFANC SHEET I OF 1 37 Groundwater Replenishment System I Development, Operation and Maintenance Agreement t October 11, 2002 Exhibit F Peak Flow Notifications The Sanitation District shall follow one of the following notice procedures prior to providing Peak Flows of Specification Influent to the Water District. 1. Wet Weather Events. Sanitation District shall notify the Water District that the Sanitation District will be moving to Code Blue of its Emergency Response Plan whereby the Water District shall initiate wet weather readiness procedures, including; confirmation that all process and hydraulic units are ready to convey up to one hundred and twenty-eight (128) mgd of Specification Influent flow from the Sanitation District Plant No. 1. The Sanitation District shall then notify its Water District that the Sanitation District will be moving to Code Yellow of their Emergency Response Plan whereby the Water District shall (a) notify off-shift plant operations personnel to "on-call" status; (b) notify all on-shift plant operations personnel that the Water District has moved to Emergency Response Code Yellow and the System shall be available to take the Peak Flows. 2. Maintenance of Sanitation District Facilities. The System will be available to take Peak Flows of Specification Influent during maintanance events that temporarily reduce the Santitaion District's outfall system capacity. The Sanitation District shall notify the Water District when the Santiation District plans to use this excess capacity for maintenance shutdown of facilities that temporarily reduce their ouffall capacity. The notification by Sanitation District to Water District shall be a minimum of two weeks prior to Water District accepting the Peak Flows for the scheduled maintenance activity. 3. Emergency. The Water District will make every reasonable attempt to take Peak Flows of Specfication Influent during an unplanned emergency event whereby the outfall system capacity is reduced. The Sanitation District shall immediately notify the Water District when the Sanitation District wants to use this excess capacity for emergency situations when the outfall system capacity is reduced. 38 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To So of Dir. - 10 /w AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number I Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, SOUTHEAST BARRIER PIPELINE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline Project, OCWD Contract No. GWRS-2001-3,funded under Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Job No. J-36, Groundwater Replenishment System, in the total amount of$ 3,381,000, with OCWD and OCSD paying equal shares of$1,690,500. SUMMARY • In August, the OCSD Board granted the OCWD authority to award a contract for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline in an amount not to exceed $3,300,000 to the low bidder and to approve change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed 5% of the original contract amount, with the OCWD and the OCSD paying equal shares of the contract price. • On September 19, 2002, eight bids were received. • The lowest bid was in the amount of$3,381,000, $81,000 higher than the Engineer's Estimate of$3,300,000. • The Groundwater Replenishment System construction budget for this contract is $3,450,000. • The Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) recommends awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for the bid amount of$ 3,381,000. • The recommended action was approved by the JCC on October 14, 2002. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The value of the agreement awarded with this action is $3,381,000 to be equally shared with OCWD in the amount of$1,690,500. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2001-02 CIP Budget Sec.B, page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) aaa•a Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the attached October 14, 2002 JCC Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES There no recommended alternatives to awarding to the lowest responsible bidder. CEQA FINDINGS _ The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and Orange County Water District (OCWD) Boards of Directors certified the Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001, Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. October 14, 2002 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Ultraviolet Light Equipment Pre-selection. WS:jo:sa G?ntBlobalWBenda Draft ReporlsUoint Boards\Item GW RS.sebarner aw rd,doc Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO, J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT I PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJEOTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT ' BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTAL EX EX BUDGET INCREASE BUDOET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATIONNTO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Donnelopment $ 700,000 $ 4,000 $ 4.000 $ 4000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 100% StudiesfPermil0n ' 3,313,000 $ 3,313.000 $ 3300000 $ 3300000 11 3313.000 100% Consultant PSA' $ 7.600000 $ 18631849 $ 18,631,849 S 16830.784 S 16E30784 $ 0737000 28% Design Stag $ 2.149.000 $ 5.357.000 $ 5.357.000 $ 5 357 000 $ 5,357.000 1,122.000 21% Construction Contract" $ 86481,500 $ 190,223.000 $190223000 S 9,642655 E 3387000 $ 13.023655 , , $ 260000 20% Constructlon Administration" $ 2653900 S 6653000 $ 6.653.000 $ 5496519 $ 5495.519 $ 209000 4% ConstructionIns action $ 328000 $ 328000 $ 62.000 0% Contingency $ 11S6 151 $ 11,8151 0% ,0 ,000PROJECTTOTAL $ 121,925,000 $ 236,372,000 $236,372.000 $ 40630958 $ 3.381.000 $ M,011,95 1267 Relmburseble Cosls $ 45,OM.000 1 1 $ 45,000,000 1 1 $ 1,653,000 PROJECT NET $ 121,925,000 $ 191,372,000 $191.372,000 1 $ 40,630,958 1$ 3.381.000 1 $ 44,011,958 1$ 10,414,000 1 24% 'Funds authorized to date Includes multipb contracts Issued under the terms of the Coopemdve Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Waler District "Funds authorized to date include Pipeline at Theo Lacy Jell,SCE substation construction.temporary,oft facilities,production of MF/UV vendor design documents,and Owner Controlled Insurance Program and now adds the Southeast Bonier Pipeline "'Funds authorized to data Include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27.2002 G.tntgloba"nda Draft ReponsWolnl BoardsVOCT02 GWRS SE Baffler Award.adl.xle]sebemler Agenda Item #4 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: October 14, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $ 3,300,000 From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Mike Markus Subject: AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. GWRS-2001-3, SOUTHEAST BARRIER PIPELINE PROJECT SUMMARY Eight bids for Contract No. GWRS-2001-3, Southeast Barrier Pipeline Project, were received and opened on September 19, 2002. Following evaluation of the bids, staff recommends awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for the bid amount of$ 3,381,000. RECOMMENDATION A. Receive and file Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids; B. Ratify issuance of Addendum No. 1; and C. Accept bid and award Contract No. GWRS-2001-3, Southeast Barrier Pipeline Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for the bid amount of$ 3,381,000 (to be split equally). _ Agendize for the October 16 OCWD Board Meeting and the October 23 OCSD Board Meeting. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS In August, your Committee, and the Boards of Directors approved plans and specifications and authorized solicitation of bids for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline Project. This project is being constructed to initially provide a potable water supply to the existing seawater intrusion barrier during the construction and initial operation of the GWR System treatment facilities and ultimately will be used to supply GW R System product water to four new injection wells. - 1 - Agenda Item #4 The Notice inviting Bids was published on August 14, 2002 and one addendum was issued on September 10, 2002, which provided minor clarifications to the plans and specifications. Bids were opened on September 19, 2002 and a total of eight bids were received. The companies that submitted bids and the respective bid amounts were as follows: Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. $ 3,381,000 J. Fletcher Creamer& Son, Inc. $ 3,679,554 Vido Artukovich & Son /Vidmar Inc. $ 3,851,032 Colich & Sons LP $ 3,962,150 Steve Bubalo Construction $ 4,258,648 Colich Construction $ 4,500,000 W.A. Rasic Construction Co., Inc. $ 4,691,621 ARB, Inc. $ 5,370,000 Staff has evaluated the bid of Mladen Buntich Construction Co. Inc. and found it to be complete and responsive. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. has the appropriate state contractors license which is current and in good standing. References have also been checked and found acceptable. The low bid that was received is $81,000 over the budget for this individual project, and the overall project budget will be adjusted to reflect this bid amount and included in the final budget to be adopted by this Committee and both Board of Directors. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS November 14, 2001 and August 12, 2002. - 2 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meedng Date TolSd or .Dir. o23ioz AGENDA REPORT tram Number Item Numee 15(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM PRE-SELECTION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Emerson/Westinghouse as the supplier for the process control system (PCS) for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System based on a lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$2,369,916; (2) Approve a Pre-Selection Agreement between Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Emerson/Westinghouse for engineering services in the amount of $312,110, and a pricing structure for PCS equipment to be procured under future contracts valued at $1,640,132, for a total not to exceed $1,952,242; and (3) Approve a Task Order between OCWD and Emerson/Westinghouse providing for engineering services for the PCS design and standards development in an amount not to exceed $312,110, to be equally shared between OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District. SUMMARY • The Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) authorized Staff to issue a request for proposals to two short-listed firms to provide process control systems. • The requests for proposals were sent to these two firms specializing in process control systems and two proposals were received. • Emerson/Westinghouse proposes the lowest capital cost of$1,952,242 and the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of $2,369,916. • Approval is requested to award a $312,110 task order to Emerson/Westinghouse for engineering design and standards documents at this time. _ • The remaining balance in the amount of$1,640,132 represents the cost for equipment that will be procured through construction contracts for the GWR System. • Each construction contract that contains control system components will include the pricing structure defined in the agreement. • The installation contracts will be brought before the Joint Cooperative Committee and the Boards at time of award. • The recommended action was approved by the Joint Cooperative Committee on October 14, 2002. AM.. �8 Page 1 _ r PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The value of the agreement awarded with this action is $312,110 to be equally shared with OCWD in the amount of$156,055. The authorization of funds is requested with this approval is for the engineering documents only in the amount of$156,055. Authorization of expenditures for the process control system components will be requested with the award of the construction contracts in the future. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line item: :2002-03 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 157) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the attached October 14, 2002 Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES Alternatives to issuing a proposal for pre-selection of the process control system included preparing final designs for the facilities without a single control system selected. This would have allowed the microfiltration supplier, the ultraviolet equipment supplier, and the Advanced Water Treatment facility contractor to provide different control systems. This would cause the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to have much higher programming, licensing and system maintenance costs. The pre-selection allows control standards to be developed so all equipment providers will provide the same control systems that function similarly, reducing the long-term operation and maintenance costs to the OCWD. CEQA FINDINGS The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)and OCWD Boards of Directors certified the Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001, Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. October 14, 2002 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Process Control System Pre-selection. JDH:jo WeadNatalWglobaMgenea Draft Reportsu mt BceMsM rn.GWRS.pma M.d. Re.,w-. erzoea Page 2 e ; . BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT , PROPOSED PROPOSED t FUNDS. THIS MMO ESTIMATED PROJECTRA$N AUTHORIZED PROJECT v BUDGq,,y REVISED 1, AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATIdill PROPOSED 70TAL EXPENDITURE EXPENb�bj ION 'BUDGET BUbDET INCREASE BUDGET ! ,' TO BATE REDUE6T ; t _ TO DATE 76 Project Development $ 700,000 If, 4.OX $ 4.000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 100% StdleslPearni 3.313,000 $ 3.313.000 $ 3.300000 $ 3300,000 If 3,313,000 100% Consultant PSA• $ 7.500,000 $ 18,631.849 If 18631849 If 16.830.784 $ 16.830,784 S 4,737000 28% Design Stan $ 2348000 S 5.357.000 $ 5.357.000 5,357400 $ 5357,000 $ 1.122.000 21% Construction Contract- $ 86.481.600 $ 190.223.000 $190.223000 $ 13.023,655 It 312.110 $ 13336.765 $ 2,600.000 19% Consbactlon Administration••• $ 2653,900 $ 6,653,000 $ 6,653000 $ 54%.519 $ 5.496,519 $ 209000 4% Construction Inspection $ 9,345.600 $ 326000 $ 326000 It 82000 0% (3ontingency If 12.895.000 If 11,864.151 $ 11,864,151 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 121,926.000 $ 236,372,D00 It235,372,000 $ 44,011.958 $ 312,110 $ 44.324.068 $ 12,067.DD0 27% Rehnbursable Costa $ 45.0110.000 $ 46,000,000 11 1 1 $ 1,653.000 PROJECT NET 1 $ 121,925.000 1$ 191.372.000 $191,372.000 11 $ 44,011.958 $ 312,110 $ 44.324,068 1$ 10.414.000 1 23% Funds authorized to data Includes multiple cor,"M Issued under the terns of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System vAth the Orange County Water District "Funds authorized to date include Pipelne at Theo Lady Jan,SCE substation construction,temporary once facilities,production of MF/UV vendor design documents,Owner Controlled Insurance Program.ScuBroasl Barrier Pipeline,and now adds Process Control System vendor design and standards documents. •••Funds authorized b data Include Construction Management Services awarded on Febmary 27,2002 GWtgbbalkAga da Draft ReportsUoint SoadsVOCT02 GWRS PCS awad.offl AsIPR Agenda Item#2 it AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: October 14, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCW D/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600,70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $ 4,800;000 From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Bill Everest, Laura Thomas Subject: AWARD OF PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM PRESELECTION CONTRACT SUMMARY Two proposals for the Process Control System Pre-Selection Agreement were received and opened on September 16, 2002. Following evaluation of the proposals, staff recommends awarding the contract to the lowest responsible proposer, Emerson/Westinghouse Process Controls Inc., for the amount of$1,952,242. The expenditure that will be made at this time is for engineering services to develop the process control system design and standards for$312,110. The remaining balance in the amount of$1,640,132 represents the cost for equipment that will be procured through construction contracts for the GW R System. Each construction contract that contains control system components will include the pricing structure defined in the agreement. The construction contracts will be brought before the Committee and Boards in the future for approval. RECOMMENDATION A. Approve Emerson/Westinghouse Process Controls Inc. as the process control system (PCS) supplier for the Groundwater Replenishment System based on lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$2,369,916; and B. Approve a Pre-Selection Agreement between OCWD and Emerson/Westinghouse for engineering services in the amount of$312,110, and a pricing structure for PCS equipment to be procured under future contracts valued at $1,640,132 all for a total not to exceed $1,952,242; and C. Approve a Task Order between OCWD and Emerson/Westinghouse Process Controls Inc. to provide engineering services for the PCS design and standards development for a total amount not to exceed $312,110 (to be split equally). Agendize for the October 16 OCWD Board Meeting and the October 23 OCSD Board Meeting. - 1 - Agenda Item 02 DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS In August, your Committee, and the Boards of Directors approved plans and specifications and authorized solicitation of proposals for the pre-selection of the Process Control System Supplier. The Notice inviting proposals was published on August 21, 2002 and one addendum was issued on September 9, 2002, which provided minor clarifications to the plans and - specifications. Proposals were opened on September 16, 2002 and a total of two proposals were received. The companies submitted proposals on both the initial capital costs for the contract amount and a 10-year life-cycle cost. The proposals are summarized as follows: Proposer Contract Amount Life-Cycle Cost Emerson/Westinghouse Process Control Inc. $1,918,069 $2,338,202 U. S. Filter Controls $2,811,537 $4,172,874 Staff has evaluated the proposal of Emerson /Westinghouse Process Controls Inc. (Delta V)and found it to be complete and responsive. After a detailed technical evaluation staff sent a letter asking for clarification of minor math errors and equipment quantities (see attached). The total contract amount was increased $34,172.99 to $1,952,242. The present worth cost was increased by$31,714 for a final fife-cycle cost of$2,369,916. The expenditure that will be made at this time is for engineering services to develop the process control system design and standards for$312,110. The remaining balance in the amount of$1,640,132 represents the cost for equipment that will be procured through construction contracts for the GWR System. The barrier, pipeline and main AWT facility has a control system component. This agreement with Emerson/Westinghouse sets the pricing structure for each component of the control system. This pricing structure will be used on each construction contract thatcontains control system components. The construction contracts will be brought before the Committee and Boards in the future for approval. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS August 12, 2002. The JCC recommended approval of the request for proposals (RFP) to pre-select a Process Control System Supplier (PCSS); and confirmed that the top two candidates from the previous qualification evaluation, Emerson / Westinghouse Process Controls Inc. (Delta V) and US Filter Controls / Honeywell (Plantscape), would receive the RFP. June 10, 2002. The JCC authorized staff to proceed with developing an RFP to pre- select a PCS Supplier, and to bring back the RFP for issuance approval, together with background information on the four suppliers and rationale for selecting the top two candidates. - 2- BOARD OF DIRECTORS Maetly�are TG Bd.Gf Dir. e-23-02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Nu be 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: James Colston, Senior Regulatory Specialist SUBJECT: Draft NPDES Permit Renewal Application GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Review of NPDES Permit Renewal Application — Information Only SUMMARY Staff will provide the Board with the draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit renewal application. The application is due to the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, by December 2002. Staff will provide an overview of the application to the Board, and staff will seek final approval of the application at the November 20, 2002 Board meeting. The goal of the application is to recognize the July 17tb, 2002 decision of the Board of Directors to meet the secondary treatment standard of the Clean Water Act as expeditiously as possible. The application does not seek renewal of the Clean Water Act section 301(h) modification from secondary treatment. Compliance with the Clean Water Act Ocean Discharge Criteria as well as much of the section 301(h) requirements is demonstrated in the application in order to provide a transition from the current level of treatment to the secondary treatment standard. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) GMp.EIa,OpeMaleuvtl ApenEB Repvtt�a dAp HepMA1C mIG MESV 1Rme IA= �.: , , I Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS The draft NPDES Permit Renewal Application will be provided at the Board Meeting. Gh E��PG =RepwVW" ]Baud Ap 0.e %IWNtem 16 NPOES Penh Ne lOoc Rewa 10ro 2 M ) Page 2