Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002-09-24
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 19, 2002 NOTICE OF MEETING sense BOARD OF DIRECTORS 171419822411 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 17141982035566 YNNOeCed... WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2002 — 7:00 P.M. maning address: P.O 6.8127 Fountain Valley.M 92728-8127 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES .c Ellis tangs 10844 Ellis Avenue Ellie 10844 d.:Fnantun Voila,,CA Fountain Valley, California 92708 92708-7018 Member The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation A....1.. District will be held at the above location, time and date. • Clete. Anaheim era '1 1, eaena Pea:LYpreds Board Secretary Fountain Valle,Fidid - Grmn Garden h Huntington Beach Irime Le Had. La Palma Loa Alamimh Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings NeuporL Beech orange Plactentia Seat Ane Seelt g Beach steeds AD HOC COMMITTEE re URBAN RUNOFF -Thursday, September 26, 2002 at 4:00 p.m. Tustin Villa Perk rorba Linda OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday, October 2, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. County or orange @ Plant No.2—Tour sanitary Districts PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday, October 3,2002 at 5:00 p.m. Cad.Main JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT More,ot, SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, October 14,2002 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD Water Districts FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday, October 16, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. Imse Bench STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday, October 23,2002 at 5:00 p.m. To maintain corltl clew leadership in wastewater and water resource management i mm BOARD MEETING DATES October 23, 2002 November 20 2002 'December 18, 2002 January 22, 2003 February 26, 2003 March 26, 2003 April 23, 2003 May 28, 2003 June 25, 2003 *July 16, 2003 August 27, 2003 September 24, 2003 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month GAwp.dU\adminzs\Agenda\2002 Meeting NoticeSWN9.2.doc REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE TO THE BOARD (TONIGHT'S REPORT 3 OF 3) WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2002 AT 5 P.M. 1 . THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 28TH MEETING WERE APPROVED AS DRAFTED, AND I ASK THE BOARD SECRETARY THAT THEY BE RECEIVED AND FILED. 2. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. I REPORTED ON YESTERDAY'S SANITATION DISTRICT/SAWPA JOINT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ON THE RELOCATION OF THE SARI LINE. THE COMMITTEE ENDORSED A STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO SELECT THE FIRM ESA TO CONDUCT THE STATE EIR AND FEDERAL EIS WORK, REVIEWED THE WORK ON THE 8 ALTERNATIVES FOR RELOCATING OR PROTECTING-IN-PyACE THE SARI LINE, AND I FER D THE QUESTION OF PROJECT �}-,S ISsuE F,Atep,EMENT BY THE CORP OF ENGINEERS,TA LVIL(, UR PDC AND T, SAWPA'S BOARD FOR 3. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. BLAKE REPORTED ON THE OCTOBER 10T" ORANGE COUNTY INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD ROLLOUT. THIS IS A JOINT EFFORT BY THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS, UC IRVINE, AND THE CALIFORNIA REBUILD AMERICA COALITION--CAL RAC, FOR SHORT. BLAKE IS PRESIDENT OF CAL RAC AND IS WORKING WITH OTHER ORANGE COUNTY MANAGERS AND ENGINEERS TO RAISE PUBLIC AWARENESS FOR THE NEED FOR ADEQUATE FUNDING AND MANAGEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE. THE REPORT CARD ROLL-OUT WILL HELP TO BRING THE PUBLIC'S ATTENTION TO THIS NEED. IF YOU OR YOUR CITY MANAGER IS INTERESTED IN ATTENDING THE ROLL- OUT, PLEASE SEE LISA MURPHY. B. BLAKE ALSO REPORTED ON STAFF'S PLANS TO USE ASSET MANAGEMENT AS OUR FUTURE ORGANIZING PRINICPLE FOR HOW WE PLAN, DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN OUR CAPITAL FACILITIES. WHILE ASSET MANAGEMENT IS A NEW TERM FOR MOST OF US, IT IS A WELL-ESTABLISHED PRACTICE IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND. STAFF INTENDS TO BORROW FROM THAT EXPERIENCE AND BRING IT HERE TO THE SANITATION DISTRICT SO THAT WE CAN IMPROVE OUR COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND LONG- TERM SUSTAINABILITY. BY THE WAY, FOR ANY OF THE DIRECTORS THAT MIGHT FIND THIS IDEA OF INTEREST TO YOUR OWN CITY, THERE WILL BE 2 WORKSHOPS HELD IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ON ASSET MANAGEMENT IN NOVEMBER. CONTACT LISA MURPHY IF YOU WANT MORE INFORMATION. 4. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL 5. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. THE STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSED VARIOUS OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT ISSUES WITH REPRESENTATIVES FROM EPA AND THE REGIONAL BOARD. B. THE MEMBERS DISCUSSED THE ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY OUR LEGISLATIVE CONSULTANT IN WASHINGTON DC ENS RESOURCES CONSULTING SERVICES. THE STEERING COMMITTEE CONFIRMED THE GENERAL MANAGER'S ACTION TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF ENS IN SECURING EPA CONSTRUCTION GRANTS AND IN MAKING A CHANGE TO THE CLEAN WATER ACT TO DEAL WITH THE UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCE OF A LOCAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AGENCY VOLUNTARILY ELECTING TO NOT RE-APPLY FOR A 301 (h) PERMIT C. C.THE COMMITTEE ALSO DISCUSSED SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 50, THE CLEAN WATER AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND, THAT IS ON THE NOVEMBER 5TH BALLOT. IT WAS AGREED TO D. I AM PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE THAT THE GENERAL MANAGERS OF THE SANITATION DISTRICT AND THE WATER DISTRICT HAVE AGREED TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LONG-AWAITED GWRS AGREEMENT THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM WAS REVIEWED. THE JCC COMMITTEE HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE AGREEMENT. IT WILL BE REVIEWED BY ALL 3 WORKING COMMMITTEES IN OCTOBER ON ITS WAY FOR CONSIDERATION FOR ADOPTION BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON OCTOBER 23RD. THE WATER DISTRICT WILL ALSO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE AGREEMENT IN OCTOBER. E. THE TENTATIVE AGENDA LISTINGS FOR THE OCTOBER WORKING COMMITTEE MEETINGS WERE REVIEWED. F. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ON ITEMS ON TONIGHT'S BOARD AGENDA WERE DISCUSSED. 6. THERE WERE TWO CLOSED-SESSION ITEMS. THE FIRST HAD TO DO WITH DEPARTMENT HEAD BENEFITS. THE SECOND HAD TO DO WITH POTENTIAL LITIGATION REGARDING OUR OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT. CHAIR'S REPORT (TONIGHT'S REPORT 2 OF 3) BOARD MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2002 1 . STEVE ANDERSON HAS VOLUNTEERED TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICT'S REPRESENTATIVE ON THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. THANK YOU, STEVE. _r 2. THE STANDING COMMITTEES MEETING SCHEDULE FOR THE COMING MONTH IS: AD HOC COMMITTEE: TOMORROW AFTERNOON, SEPTEMBER 26T" BEGINNING AT 4 P.M. OMTS COMMITTEE: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2ND PDC COMMITTEE: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3RD FAHR COMMITTEE: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 9TH 3. GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOINT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE September 16, 2002 • The Committee recommended approval the Joint Exercise Powers Agreement for the Development, Operation, and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System. This item will be presented at the October Board meeting for consideration. • The Committee recommended approval a Task Order to Westin Engineering for Task 25, Preliminary Design and Implementation Planning for the Integrated Information System for the Groundwater Replenishment System in an amount not to exceed $290,000. This item is before the Board tonight. • The Committee recommended approval of Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc., decreasing the authorized amount by $2,945,100, for changes in the Scope of Work. This item is before the Board tonight. • The Committee approved a Task Order to Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $66,000 to secure additional grant funding from Prop 50 and other available grant source. • The next regularly scheduled meeting of the JCC will be Monday, October 14, 2002 at 5:30 p.m. 1teadldetalUpdU"IPDCWdcB2'Buaela1082502 Bard MW SOW-J3615im.dm • 1 SEPTEMBER 25, 2002 BOARD ITEM NO. 15.c: • On March 28, 2001, the Boards of Directors of the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District authorized Addendum No. 3 with, Dresser and McKee Inc. (CDM)for the final design, construction support services, and start-up services for the Groundwater Replenishment System,with two addenda being approved subsequently for design changes and cost of living increases. • Since November 2001, there have been nine changes to the final design contract with CDM. Eight of those changes involve increased fees, while one is a significant decrease in fees. Proposed Addendum No. 6 includes these nine changes. • In addition, the attached August 12, 2002, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) Agenda Item Submittal discusses possible changes that will necessitate a subsequent addendum at a future date. • The JCC recommends approval of Addendum No. 6 to the PSA with CDM, for a reduction in fees of$2,945,100. • Addendum No. 6 would decrease the CDM team's authorized budget from $35,890,804 to an amount not to exceed $32,945,704. Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. decreasing the authorized amount by$2,945,100, from$35,890,804 to a total amount not to exceed$32,954,704, fora change in the Scope of Work in accordance with the Professional Services Agreement for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District sharing the deduct in an equal amount of$1,472,550. SEPTEMBER 25, 2002 BOARD ITEM NO. 15.d: There is a revised agenda report in the Director's Folders. The contract amount was changed from $310,000 to $290,000. • The Integrated Information System (IIS)will allow Orange County Water District (OCWD)to provide for long-term sustainability and cost-effective Operations & Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System. • The IIS will provide OCWD with a systematic process of operating, maintaining, and upgrading physical assets cost-effectively. • The IIS will be developed in a five-stage process: planning, design, acquisition, installation and operation. The planning stage is a $290,000 element of$6,600,000 in total engineering services, software acquisition, and integration costs for the IIS. • A key integration component for the IIS is with the Financial Information System (FIS). Westin is currently developing the new FIS for OCWD. Westin also provided peer review of Camp Dresser and McKee, Ines. work on developing the IIS program and developed the preliminary work on implementation planning for the IIS. • Brown and Caldwell is on the GWR System final design team and provided expertise in the area of asset management for the project. Brown and Caldwell has also performed rehabilitation and replacement planning for OCWD's existing facilities. • Staff recommends entering into a Sole Source agreement with Westin as the lead consultant and Brown and Caldwell as a subconsultant for the planning work for the IIS for a total not to exceed $290,000. • The remainder of the IIS work for the GWR System has an estimated value of $6,310,000, and will be competitively solicited. Approve an Orange County Water District issued Task Order to Westin Engineering, Inc. for an amount not to exceed$290,000 for implementation planning for the Integrated Information System for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District sharing equal costs of$145,000. ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 09/25/02 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (MURPHY).................. ..... ALVAREZ............. ......... — (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON....... _ ........ ✓ _ (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD......... ........ C✓ �� — (MILLER).......................... BRADY ............. .......... ✓ JG — (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ................... �G — (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE.............. (CRANDALL).................... COOK, LAURANN.........._ .� ✓ — (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE....................._j�, — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ JL — — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... ✓' �C — (DUVALL)......................... GULLIXSON...................3 — (DEBOLT)......................... JEMPSA...................... ✓ _� — (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... ✓ — (SMITH)............................ KROM........................ ✓ (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ — (CHRISTY) ....................... MC GUIGAN.................. ✓r �C — — (SIMONOFF).................... MOORE........................ ✓ �� — (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............. _ T — (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. _ ✓ _ (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ ✓= — (ADAMS) ......................... RIDGEWAY...................—a— 0 — (DOW) .............................. SIGLER.......................... _ (SMITH. CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... — ernl KER STAFF: '0j nttts' Anderson rb✓"y Kelli ✓ � � �� l Ludwin ✓ ul Mathews Miles ✓ Murphy ✓ Ooten ✓ Tomko Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus Nixon ^ M r te 06/19/02 G:%wp.dlaladMnOSDIRECTOFtOreclae Rail Cal.dx REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks maybe limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: I'� 2S� 'O Z. AGENDA ITEM NO. h IL NAME: (please print) Do crp i.o y-fkrE HOME ADDRESS: I6) 2o / I�I/ U,s (number/street) 5- ey- C. &� -ej C'A 5107 go (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( ) `I3p-Z`f SC REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ZS D 2-- AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (city/zip code) l TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: l— �e" © ' U (self/name of organizatio REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 2S Oa AGENDAITEMNO. uli [C (6'toA,o,4s NAME: (please print) e ✓zV�Q �n .`' p 1 ��jJ HOME ADDRESS: ISI/ � DPLndnA',j PJ < A #N6 (number/street) w� F ,w�➢� 01a� �3 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 53' 0S,N REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.� DATE: i 'Z D Z AGENDA ITEM NO. `n.-C ajAte& NAME: (please print) �`� y�N 10" CQZ1� HOME ADDRESS: Z Z f ll—leex�' S� (number/street) 90 1 GM- (city/zip code)TELEPHONE: 4!so Ste( U/� —`Q Z S� REPRESENTING: � ♦a (self/name o organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given tto the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ' ` AGENDA ITEM NO. a }�R,/R�/} }',}A,.} } } Y 4 } } R R R } NAME: (please print) Rl� l ! vC4f L� MI D HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) L (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: (_) C REPRESENTING: r4;;-/ (self/name of organization) SIGN-IN SHEET 0 NGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) ff�'I�SfL � CI.4 f (J'a row dP¢� n /L Pf /2,A CO3TA1 ✓lN P)A S gam, RANb �c ,9nr HAWP.DTAIADMINWT0RMSVGN-IN FORM.D Draft MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, September 18,2002, 5:00 p.m. - A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on September 18,2002, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Brian Brady, Chair Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Roy Moore,Vice Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Brian Donahue Maintenance Mark Leyes Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Joy Neugebauer Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager James W. Silva Mike White, Controller Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Steve Anderson, Vice Board Chair Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: John M. Gullixson OTHERS PRESENT: Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel Mike Moreland Greg Giles Randy Fuhrrnan (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman spoke in opposition to revising the District's resolution for biosolids management to approve the landfilling of biosolids until the District determines it needs to landfill biosolids. He expressed concern with the operational and maintenance agreement that was recently approved by the Joint Cooperative Committee for the GWRS project, suggesting the agreement,in its current draft, will cost OCSD $3-$5 million more than was previously reported. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting °- Page 2 September 18, 2002 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The.Chair reported a need to amend Agenda Item No. 11(b)to add two additional employee positions,which needed immediate action and came to staffs attention subsequent to the publication of the agenda. The Chair stated that this item could be added pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), upon a two-thirds'vote of the Committee. Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, reported that after the agenda package was mailed it was brought to her attention that the Operations &Maintenance department has two limited tern employee positions they need to have reclassified as regular,full-time positions. It was Moved. Seconded. and Duly Carried: To 1) Find that the matter arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda; 2)Revise the agenda listing to reflect"five"positions that were inadvertently not included during the Fiscal Year 2002-03 budget process; and 3)Add two positions to Agenda Item No. 11(b),to wit: Item No. (11)b Recommend to the Board of Directors to revise employee five (5) positions for the Engineering and Operations and Maintenance Departments that were inadvertently not included during the FY02/03 budget process: (1) One vacant Construction Inspector position upgraded to an Engineer position; (2)One vacant Project Specialist position upgraded to an Engineer position; (3) One vacant Principal Engineering Associate position upgraded to an Engineer position; (4)One limited term Senior Engineer position changed to a full time Senior Engineer position; and (5) One limited term Engineer position changed to a full time Engineer position. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reported that Blake has returned from vacation but was unable to attend the meeting. Mr. Streed updated the directors on the status of AB 1969,which has not been signed yet by the governor. Mr. Streed also reported that the proposed operating agreement for the GWRS project will be reviewed by the standing committees in October, as well as presented to the Board of Directors at the October 23'meeting. The agreement was adopted unanimously by the Joint Cooperative Committee representatives at their last meeting. Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Maintenance, updated the Directors on the status of the disinfection program, which has been successfully running since August 1 e. Current facilities for the program are temporary, and staff has begun the design of more permanent and reliable short-term facilities. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 September 18, 2002 (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Gary Streed referred the Directors to the Treasurer's Report that was distributed to them. He also referred the Directors to a revised agenda report for Item 11(b), as well as some minor corrections on Item 11(c). Mike Moreland of Moreland &Associates reported on the independent audit his fine is conducting. He stated his staff had completed their field work and starling to review the financial statements, which are prepared by the Finance Department. A final audited report will be compiled and presented to the Committee in November. Mr. Moreland reported no adjustments or changes are required to the numbers in the general ledger that has been audited. His firm is not aware of any material weaknesses in internal controls,and the audit has progressed in a positive manner. He further advised that this year a new reporting model will be adopted, and the financial statements will look different than in the past. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. 18) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, reported that she would be requesting approval next month for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment: Plan for Stakeholder Involvement in OCSD's Future. This would outline how the stakeholders will be involved in future issues, i.e. secondary treatment standards, biosolids management, urban runoff, etc. This program will also address what the community expects from OCSD and methods of re-establishing a positive image of the District to the community. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. . The Chair ordered that the August 14, 2002 minutes for the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved, as mailed. b. FAHR02-76: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 2002. C. FAHR02-77: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. d. FAHR02-78: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of September 5, 2002. e. FAHR02-79: Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation - Claims and Costs Report. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 September 18, 2002 f. FAHR02-80: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing policies. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (f) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR02-81: Item removed. b. FAHR02-82: Recommend to the Board of Directors to revise the following five employee positions for the Engineering and Operations and Maintenance Departments that were inadvertently not included during the FY02/03 budget process: (1) One vacant Construction Inspector position upgraded to an Engineer position; (2)One vacant Project Specialist position upgraded to an Engineer position; (3)One vacant Principal Engineering Associate position upgraded to an Engineer position; (4)One limited term Senior Engineer position changed to a full time Senior Engineer position; and, (5)One limited term Engineer position changed to a full time Engineer position. Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, referred the Directors to the revised agenda report distributed to the Directors that evening. The action is upgrading three engineering positions and revising two limited term engineering positions to regular employees. Impact costs for the remainder of this fiscal year is$36,000 for the Engineering Department, and no additional costs for changing the limited term employees. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 September 18, 2002 C. FAHR02-83: Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1)Authorize staff to solicit proposals from auditing fines for Internal Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2002-108BD; and, (2) Direct staff to recommend three finalists to be interviewed by the FAHR Committee, and subsequently awarded by the Board of Directors at a future meeting. Mike White, Controller, reported that the written report includes a list of recently performed internal control,operational and performance review activities in 1994. These activities were done on an ad hoc basis by outside professional auditors. The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) recommends that every organization, regardless of size, should have some type of internal auditing function or process in place to ensure that effective controls are in place to mitigate enterprise-wide risk. Mr. White suggested that the FAHR Committee direct staff to solicit proposals, and narrow the selection to three finalists, and conduct final interviews at a future FAHR Committee meeting or establish a FAHR sub-committee to conduct the interviews. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. FURTHER MOVED: That a sub-committee be formed comprised of Directors Roy Moore and Joy Neugebauer, to conduct interviews of the three finalists. d. FAHR02-84: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget amendment of$171,073 for Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study, Phase II and III,for a total budget of $294,500;and, (2)Authorize staff to issue a change order to the purchase contract issued to Carollo Engineers,for an additional amount of$162,548,which includes a contingency of$24,948,for a total amount not to exceed $175,548. Mike White, Controller, asked that the motion be revised regarding the change order to the purchase order issued to Carollo Engineers to reflect an additional amount of$37,600,with no contingency, for a total amount not to exceed $150,600. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval of the modified motion to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 6 September 18, 2002 (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS There were none. (13) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2002 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 5:43 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item Nos. 16(a)(1), (2)and (3). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2,and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There was no reportable action taken by the Committee re Agenda Item Nos. 16(a)(1), (2)and (3). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION:At 6:25 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Sub 'fled by. Penny M. yle FAHR Committee S retary - G1wp.Gb1adndnVeSTAHR1050802 dmft FAHR MlnuWAcc V y 51X11 V 4 C7 pp I September 25, 2002 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ooten ab Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress I will be reporting and displaying data monthly on the progress made on turning up the secondary treatment and the effectiveness of disinfection. The data will be in two forms. The first will be a poster board displayed at meetings on the current month's data. The second will be in the form of historical trends of key parameters such as final effluent discharge concentrations, Biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids and the percent of secondary treatment. Please review the data and provide me with comments or questions to help refine how and what you would like to see in the future. RJO:pjm G:Wry.dta1om%IWINALV2JO1Conesp.02V.1-Board of Direorors 082802.Ex MW 0 P.O.BozalZr 0 Fourfl Y Vaky.OA a2l268127 0 (214)02.2411 Grange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Last Fiscal Year 2001-02 Progress to Secondary Standards Ending June 2002 Month: September 2002 47% 44 % Advanced Prlmary- Ocean Pipeline Ocean Pipeline Water water Disinfection Mixw MiKea Deehlorlretl 59 /o Qruc. M _ a 56 Secondary Final Effluent: Secondary Bacterial Killed: 98-99.8 % Final Effluent: BOD = 72 mg/L Goal: 99.7% BOD = _Q mg/L TSS = 50 mg/L 0.02 TSS = 43 mg/L Chlorine Level: mg/L Goal: 0 mg/L Ocean Discharge (Permit Limit:0.36 mg/L) Permit Limit: BOO = 100 mg/L TSS = 60 mg/L Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Revision 9/25/02 Final Effluent Percent Secondary Treatment psx Winter 2002 Goal = 64% . ...................................................................................................... 56% ...............................................................Monthly Average..gqo ..._..... x szst sax sgx etx Mx sox as% 12-Month Running Average ox Jul Asp Sep OC N.D. Jan Feb Mar Aq May Jun Jul Aug Sep zppr zpoz Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) mg/L in Final Effluent nv/L in Final Effluent 0o ao 1998 Permit Limit = 100 mg/L . .... _ ._........73....73... 71 73 .7370 _ 71 89 ]1 70 70 70 68 1998 Permit Limit = 60 mg/L 70 wm ........................................................................................................ 51 52 so 51 51 50 ............... 4 48 4 47 ......5 . . 8 sp ........................................................................................................ 45 ao ........................................................................................................ ap ........................................................................................................ ao m Secondary Standard Goal = 30 mg/L Secondary Standard Goal .. 30 m.. 10 .............._...................._.._..__............_...................._..................._ 10 .................................................................._._.._......_..._..._....... Jul Aug $ap 0. Nav 0. Jan Feb May Ap May Jun Jul Asp Jul AW Sab 0] Nor, Dec Jar Fab Mar far May Jun Jul Asa 2.1 3WR pgl ]OJ3 Draft MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, September 18,2002,5:00 p.m. - A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on September 18, 2002, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Brian Brady, Chair Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Roy Moore, Vice Chair Bob Doter, Director of Operations & Brian Donahue Maintenance Mark Leyes Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Joy Neugebauer Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager James W. Silva Mike White, Controller Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Steve Anderson, Vice Board Chair Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: John M. Gullixson OTHERS PRESENT: Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel Mike Moreland Greg Giles Randy Fuhrman (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman spoke in opposition to revising the District's resolution for biosolids management to approve the landfilling of biosolids until the District determines it needs to landfill biosolids. He expressed concern with the operational and maintenance agreement that was recently approved by the Joint Cooperative Committee for the GW RS project, suggesting the agreement, in its current draft, will cost OCSD $3•$5 million more than was previously reported. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 September 18, 2002 f. FAHR02-80: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing policies. Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended _ actions for items specified as 10(a)through (f) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR02-81: Item removed. b. FAHR02-82: Recommend to the Board of Directors to revise the following five employee positions for the Engineering and Operations and Maintenance Departments that were inadvertently not included during the FY02/03 budget process: (1)One vacant Construction Inspector position upgraded to an Engineer position; (2)One vacant Project Specialist position upgraded to an Engineer position; (3) One vacant Principal Engineering Associate position upgraded to an Engineer position; (4) One limited term Senior Engineer position changed to a full time Senior Engineer position; and, (5)One limited term Engineer position changed to a full time Engineer position. Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, referred the Directors to the revised agenda report distributed to the Directors that evening. The action is upgrading three engineering positions and revising two limited tern engineering positions to regular employees. Impact costs for the remainder of this fiscal year is$36,000 for the Engineering Department, and no additional costs for changing the limited term employees. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 September 18, 2002 (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Gary Streed referred the Directors to the Treasurers Report that was distributed to them. He also referred the Directors to a revised agenda report for Item 11(b), as well as some minor corrections on Item 11(c). Mike Moreland of Moreland &Associates reported on the independent audit his fine is conducting. He stated his staff had completed their field work and starting to review the financial statements,which are prepared by the Finance Department. A final audited report will be compiled and presented to the Committee in November. Mr. Moreland reported no adjustments or changes are required to the numbers in the general ledger that has been audited. His firm is not aware of any material weaknesses in internal controls, and the audit has progressed in a positive manner. He further advised that this year a new reporting model will be adopted, and the financial statements will look different than in the past. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. 18) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, reported that she would be requesting approval next month for Community Outreach and Public Involvement Ascertainment: Plan for Stakeholder Involvement in OCSD's Future. This would outline how the stakeholders will be involved in future issues, i.e. secondary treatment standards, biosolids management, urban run-off, etc. This program will also address what the community expects from OCSD and methods of re-establishing a positive image of the District to the community. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. . The Chair ordered that the August 14, 2002 minutes for the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved, as mailed. b. FAHR02-76: Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of August 2002. C. FAHR02-77: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP)Monthly Report. d. FAHR02-78: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of September 5, 2002. e. FAHR02-79: Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers'Compensation Claims and Costs Report. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting ' Page 4 September 18, 2002 f. FAHR02-80: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing policies. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (f) under Consent Calendar. FND OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR02-81: Item removed. b. FAHR02-82: Recommend to the Board of Directors to revise the following five employee positions for the Engineering and Operations and Maintenance Departments that were inadvertently not included during the FY02103 budget process: (1) One vacant Construction Inspector position upgraded to an Engineer position; (2) One vacant Project Specialist position upgraded to an Engineer position; (3) One vacant Principal Engineering Associate position upgraded to an Engineer position; (4) One limited tens Senior Engineer position changed to a full time Senior Engineer position;and, (5)One limited tens Engineer position changed to a full time Engineer position. Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, referred the Directors to the revised agenda report distributed to the Directors that evening. The action is upgrading three engineering positions and revising two limited tens engineering positions to regular employees. Impact costs for the remainder of this fiscal year is$36,000 for the Engineering Department, and no additional costs for changing the limited term employees. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting p Page 5 September 18, 2002 C. FAHR02-83: Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1)Authorize staff to solicit proposals from auditing firms for Internal Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2002-108BD; and, (2) Direct staff to recommend three finalists to be interviewed by the FAHR Committee, and subsequently awarded by the Board of Directors at a future meeting. Mike White, Controller, reported that the written report includes a list of recently performed internal control, operational and performance review activities in 1994. These activities were done on an ad hoc basis by outside professional auditors. The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) recommends that every organization, regardless of size, should have some type of internal auditing function or process in place to ensure that effective controls are in place to mitigate enterprise-wide risk. Mr. White suggested that the FAHR Committee direct staff to solicit proposals,and narrow the selection to three finalists, and conduct final interviews at a future FAHR Committee meeting or establish a FAHR sub-committee to conduct the interviews. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. FURTHER MOVED: That a sub-committee be formed comprised of Directors Roy Moore and Joy Neugebauer,to conduct interviews of the three finalists. d. FAHR02-84: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget amendment of$171,073 for Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study, Phase II and III, for a total budget of $294,500; and, (2)Authorize staff to issue a change order to the purchase contract issued to Carollo Engineers,for an additional amount of$162,548, which includes a contingency of$24,948,for a total amount not to exceed $175,548. Mike White, Controller,asked that the motion be revised regarding the change order to the purchase order issued to Carollo Engineers to reflect an additional amount of$37,600,with no contingency, for a total amount not to exceed $150,600. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval of the modified motion to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 6 September 18, 2002 (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS There were none. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2002 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 5:43 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item Nos. 16(a)(1), (2)and (3). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2,and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There was no reportable action taken by the Committee re Agenda Item Nos. 16(a)(1), (2)and (3). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION:At 6:25 p.m.,the Committee reconvened in regular session. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. S77Ma' d by: /1. Penny MA Kyle FAHR Committee Sedetary GAwp.daa rrdnXBSFAHRtOWW2 dtffi1 FAHR Minutm.doc _ 0 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlng Dale To 09/.Or Dlr. o9/zsraz AGENDA REPORT Item Minter IOm Numbe tsrm Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an Orange County Water District Issued Task Order to Westin Engineering, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $290,000 for implementation planning for the Integrated Information System for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36,with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District sharing equal costs of$145,000. SUMMARY • The Integrated Information System (IIS)will allow Orange County Water District (OCWD)to provide for long-term sustainability and cost-effective Operations & Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment(GWR)System. • The IIS will provide OCWD with a systematic process of operating, maintaining, and upgrading physical assets cost-effectively. • The IIS will be developed in a five-stage process: planning, design, acquisition, installation and operation. The planning stage is a $290,000 element of$6,600,000 in total engineering services, software acquisition, and integration costs for the IIS. • A key integration component for the IIS is with the Financial Information System (FIS). Westin is currently developing the new FIS for OCWD. Westin also provided peer review of Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc's. work on developing the IIS program and developed the preliminary work on implementation planning for the IIS. • Brown and Caldwell is on the GWR System final design team and provided expertise in the area of asset management for the project. Brown and Caldwell has also performed rehabilitation and replacement planning for OCWD's existing facilities. • Staff recommends entering into a Sole Source agreement with Westin as the lead consultant and Brown and Caldwell as a subconsultent for the planning work for the IIS for a total not to exceed $290,000. • The remainder of the IIS work for the GWR System has an estimated value of $6,310,000, and will be competitively solicited. "•�^ ^+ Page 1 P PROJECT/CONTRAC T COST SUMMARY Authorization of$145,000 for Consultant's Professional Service Agreement is being requested for Orange County Sanitation District's(OCSD)50%share of the proposed $290,000 Task Order, as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2002-03 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 157) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the September 16, 2002, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES Because the Orange County Water District (OCWD)is issuing a new Task Order, competitive proposals could have been solicited. Staff requests to instead reorganize the existing consultants and issue a task order. There would have been additional time and expense to solicit proposals and bring a new consultant on-board for the planning effort for the Integrated Information System (IIS)plan. The existing team members will not have to work through a learning curve that would cause a time delay and added expense. CEQA FINDINGS The OCSD and OCWD Board of Directors certified the Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001; Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002 and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. September 16, 2002, JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Integrated Information System —Task Order to Westin Engineering, Inc. WTS:jo GMtgIobaMgenda Draft Reportsuoint Boards111em 15(d).Westln Engineenng r 1.doc Renee: °a 1 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 n�1 4 I a ORIDINALivfti' '.CURRENT PROPOSED 1.PROP.OSED II;FUNDS 1i i+- THIS +"' E TIMATEO ESTIMATED,, l PROPOSED TOTAL 'iP OJECT?ASK AUTIIORIZEP I .PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AIAWOR0D AUTf10RDATION j' AU ORVATO FJIPENg13UR�1 iE PENDED.",, �t' °A Ns'M1i I';i' �"N ,'SUD(iET^�:'ihk BUDG',E'f p11NCR�ASE v b.SUDOET jp II TbfOATEvu It sItEDUES�inly '•1!�4nn Oval :.oNk TOIDCI`fE 470,DATEj^',i Project 'M�; Develo meet $ 700000 $ 4000 $ 4,0D0 {n! S 4000 $ 4.000 $ 4,000 100% 11 Studtes'Permiain - 3.313000 $ 3.313,000 $ 3300.000 $ 3.300.000 $ 3313000 100% Consultant PSA' $ 7500000 E 18,631849 $ 18.831,848 :_' $ 18885784 8 145,000 $ 16.830,784 E 2800,000 15% Design Staff S 2.349.000 $ 5.357.000 S 5 357,000 �;$' $ 5.357.000 $ 5,357.000 $ 1,40D.000 28% Construction Conrad. $ 86,481.500 $ 157.200.000 $15120D000 j:; It 9.642.655 $ 9.642.665 $ 3,000000 31% Construction Administration". $ 26539D0 $ 6653,000 $ 8853000 , $ 5496519 $ 5.496.519 $ 200000 4% CenstruWon Inspection $ 9.345,fi00 $ 326000 S 326000 0% Contingency $ 12895000 It 8721.151 It 9721,151 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 121,925.000 $ 201.206,000 $201,206,000 $ 40,485,958 It 145,000 $ 40,630.11M $ 10,517,000 26% Reimbursable Costs IS 30,500.000 1 $ 30.500,000 1 1 $ 2.112.500 PROJECT NET 1 $ 121,925.000 1$ 170.706,000 1 $170,706,000 3 40.485,958 It 145.000 $ 40,630,958 1 It 8,404,500 1 21% •Funds author ad to data includes multiple contrails Issued under the terms of the Cooperations Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District "Funds authorized to data Include Pipeline at Theo Lary 1811.SCE substation construction,temporery office fadlities,agreement and easements,production of MFNV vendor design documents,and Owner Controlled Insurence Propram. —Funds authorized to date Include Construction Management Services awarded an February 27,2002 CADocuments and SeWngs*y1IA ocal Set ings\Temporery Internal FIIesWLK48FID-36 budget lable 092502wes8ntask25xM]wes11n 1 s r1r xx, 0 D ^u CJ p r September 25, 2002 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Ooten i' Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress I will be reporting and displaying data monthly on the progress made on turning up the secondary treatment and the effectiveness of disinfection. The data will be in two forms. The first will be a poster board displayed at meetings on the current month's data. The second will be in the form of historical trends of key parameters such as final effluent discharge concentrations, Biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids and the percent of secondary treatment. Please review the data and provide me with comments or questions to help refine how and what you would like to see in the future. RJO:pjm G:1wp.dhbm18101FlNALVRJO`Lmresp.02N-Board of Directors 082802.dw O D 0 P.O.Box9127 0 raamal4WDW,C 9222a41V 0 (214)%2-2411 Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Last Fiscal Year 2001-02 Progress to Secondary Standards Ending June 2002 Month: September 2002 47% 44 % A dvanced Advanced. Ocean Pipeline Primary Ocean Pipeline water - _ Wager Dlsimactlon& Miretl M'.-d Deehlorinatlon OMNe:Np.tLPR 53% 56 % Final Effluent: Secondary Bacterial Killed: 9S-99.8 % Final Effluent: SOD = 72 mg/L Goal: 99.7% BOD = 60 mg/L TSS = 50 mg/L 0.02 TSS = Aa mg/L Chlorine Level: mg/L Ocean Discharge to OCWD Goal: 0 mg/L Permit Limit: (Permit Limit: 0.36 mg/L) Boo = 100 mg/L TSS = 60 mg/L F Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Revision 9/25/02 Final Effluent Percent Secondary Treatment 65% Winter 2002 Goal = 64% ._._._..__........................................................................................ ss i ...................... .............. ........ .... .........Nmotly,lw,ags. s1% $OY S1Y $tY 12�th Runk gAfWW wJ. o% 1 Jul Aig SK Oq Np p% Js+ (ap 1.y M Mry Jan Jul Nq $W Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) ,&gL in Final Effluent mg/L in Final Effluent ao ao 1998 .Perm -I.- Limit .. 100 mg/L ......... ._..................._ ..._ . ......................................................................... ...._....... .... ... ...._ ._ .. ...._....._.... ......_.._. 71 M 71 69 71 70 70 7a 73 10 .. _........................ ._......................................................_...... 10 _._._....._ .....�... ......... ............_... 70 1998 Permit Limit = 60 mg/L ........._.__..........................._...._........................._.......................... 51 52 51 51 50 45 p ........__. _.. __..... ..... . ......_..� p ... ....._ .... ......_.................... .......................... A >D Secondary Standard Goal = 30 mg/L Secondary Standard Goal = 30 mg/L f0 ...................................... .......................................................... 10 ........................................................................................................ 0 —_ 0 Y JI10 M w xw oec I- Fro w 7p Mir J L J+i Y ft M 0,0 Nw DFc Jn F! IY M MM M, L hV A01 Np3 2b1 '!0@ STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on S , 200, was my posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on If 200? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of ' 200 Y Penny M. K , Secre Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District GAWRDTMADMURSTORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r � - 1 September 18, 2002 alone: (7141962@411 To the Chair and Members pat`p1419620356 of the Board of Directors a,rw.uad.mm Subject: Board Letter main,o&l.: Pp Box 812] Fwealn valley.CA 9272e-8127 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional k sat&M.: information on any of the items, please call me. 10e44 airs Aven,:e Fountain Valle,CA 9270e-7019 Disinfection Update wlnnar We are successfully disinfecting our effluent. The system was fully operational by the "°"""` August 12 deadline. Since then we have applied an average of 25,000 gallons per day of bleach to our effluent, followed by 5,000 gallons per day of sodium bi-sulfite OlUm which removes any residual bleach prior to our effluent reaching the ocean. Anaewm Measured bacterial reduction has been consistently greater than 98 percent and is Brea usually greater than 99.6 percent. Buena Perk �rco. %'ps1ey Sanitation District staff is working on the design and procurement of additional Fullerton improvements to the bleach/bi-sulfite system that will server our disinfection needs for Borden c''p1B approximately 3-5 years. After that time, we expect to have completed the research, iNin6n°tO"Beache 1 planning, design and construction of permanent facilities that will provide the best La craws overall method of cost-effective and environmentally protective disinfection. LA Pelme Loa Alem4as Newport Beach a-anga Secondary Treatment Standards Update Placentae Sena Ana The federal Clean Water Act defines seconds treatment as 30 arts per million Beef Ana secondary P Stanton (ppm) biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)and 30 parts per million suspended solids 'n9°n (SS). We have assembled a team of operators, scientists, engineers, technicians Villa Park rorba unak regulatory P and re ulato specialists we call Team 30-30' to achieve these standards in as timely a manner as we practically can. Staff continues to provide in-plant Gnntr of Oran, adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. sanitary Districts c4are Mae. During the twelve months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, our final effluent Midway Dry quality averaged 72 ppm BOD and 51 ppm SS. During the week ending Water DistrictsSeptember 14, our final effluent quality averaged 62 ppm BOD and 43 ppm SS. brine Ranch Bob Ghirelli and his Technical Services staff are working with our consultants, EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Governors Office to make certain that our next permit has reasonable terms and conditions that hold us accountable for achieving reasonable progress on one hand, while avoiding unreasonable risk of regulatory fines on the other. To maiream"rid Clem lememind in wastewater and water resource management. Members of the Board Page 2 September 18, 2002 David Ludwin and his Engineering staff are working to develop a design and construction schedule that integrates new secondary treatment facilities construction with the other substantial and needed facilities at our two treatment plants. Their proposed schedule is expected to be completed next spring. They must address the challenge of building nearly$2 billion in new and upgraded facilities while maintaining continuous operation of an existing 240 million gallon per day sewage treatment system. Our Purchasing Department has Received a National Award Our Purchasing Division was recently awarded the Achievement of Excellence In Procurement by the National Purchasing Institute. Purchasing was successful in their first ever application for this award. The National Purchasing Institute, which is the governmental branch of the Institute for Supply Management established this award in 1995. The annual award is earned by public or non-profit organizations that demonstrate. Organizations are required to submit a lengthy and detailed application with supporting data. Winning organizations typically score highly in a number of categories based upon best business practices for a purchasing division. Our staff obtained the maximum score in such diverse areas as: publishing a"How To Do Business"booklet for vendors; publishing a specific ethics policy; having a procurement manual for internal use; conducting formal purchasing training for staff;centralizing the procurement function; issuing electronic purchase orders; maintaining an automated vendor listing; having links to the District's web page; participating in electronic commerce; using annual contracts for commodities; and having certified professional and management staff. We have long known that our procurement program is excellent and it is rewarding that we have now received national recognition. Only 61 agencies earned this award last year. I have attached a copy of the letter from the National Purchasing Institute announcing the award. Orange County's Infrastructure—A Legacy in Peril California's infrastructure systems and facilities are fast approaching the end of their useful lives and design capacity in many regions of the state. Orange County is no exception. Our population continues to grow. Our infrastructure is aging and struggling to keep up. Residents of Orange County place great value on our quality of life. We must meet our infrastructure challenge or face a potential decline in that quality of life. Members of the Board Page 3 September 18, 2002 The first step is to understand the current condition of the County's Infrastructure. The UC Irvine Civil and Environmental Engineering Affiliates have teamed with the UC Irvine Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the California Rebuild America Coalition (CALRAC). Together they have taken on the task of assessing Orange Countys infrastructure condition, capacity and operations. Months of research, evaluation, and data analysis by professional working groups, drawn from both the public and private sector will culminate in the Orange County Infrastructure Report Card. The Report Card will focus on eight areas: aviation, transportation, schools, water supply, wastewater, solid waste, parks and recreation, and urban runoff/flood control. Our methodology draws heavily on the nationwide Report Card developed by ASCE-and includes a review and validation committee of recognized experts in each of the infrastructure areas. On October 10, 2002, the Orange County Infrastructure Report Card will be released. Reserve the date! Attached is an article on the subject written by Bob Bein, CEO of RBF Consulting and immediate Past President of the American Society of Civil Engineers. In the next several weeks, we will forward further thoughts from opinion leaders in the County concerning the challenges we face to protect an adequate system of infrastructure. We look forward to your support! NAS Biosolids Panel Chair Clarifies Findings of Biosolids Applied to Land Study As reported in the July's Board Letter, the National Academies of Science (NAS) study on "Biosolids Applied to Land:Advancing Standards and Practices," offered a grab-bag of sound bites that could be used by both sides of the biosolids debate. Even though the NAS study found that there is no documented scientific evidence that the Federal biosolids regulation has failed to protect public health, biosolids reuse opponents have taken the NAS study's recommendation for additional research as reason enough for banning biosolids reuse. Dr.Tom Burke, chair for the NAS study committee, issued a statement on September 6 clarifying the findings of the report. Dr. Burke stated that the report outlined positive steps the agency can take to evaluate and manage risks, respond to stakeholder concerns, and protect public health.The statement was prepared by the chair because some press accounts focused only on criticisms of EPA's past efforts, and do not fully reflect the findings and recommendations of the committee's report. The statement is attached for your review. Members of the Board Page 4 September 18, 2002 Media Outreach on Disinfection Disinfection came on line officially on Monday, August 12. Communications worked with the local newspapers to discuss the order by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the disinfection process and the sampling procedures. Articles appeared in the Orange County Register, the Daily Pilot, and the Huntington Beach Independent. Coverage also appeared on some network television news stations; however no calls were made to OCSD for comment or background on the disinfection issue. Public Outreach on Secondary Standards Decision Since the Board's decision on July 17 to change the level of treatment to secondary standards, communications has been updating district literature and planning outreach efforts for the operational change. Part of that plan is to provide written information and verbal presentations to civic and professional organizations that received information about the 301(h) waiver and the strategic plan update. In addition, communications is expanding the audience to people and groups who did not respond to information offers about the issue. To date, the following groups have received a presentation about the board's decision to move to secondary standards in the coming years: Independent Special Districts of Orange County(ISDOC), Water Advisory Committee of Orange County (WACO), environmental studies students at Orange County School of the Arts. Costa Mesa Kiwanis Club, and Lion's Club of Buena Park. A letter was recently mailed to an opinion leaders list to update them on the Board's July 17 decision. Communications will keep these groups and individuals, as well as many others, up to date throughout the planning, design and construction of secondary facilities and the capital,improvements program. Webslte is getting a Face Lift The Orange County Sanitation District is getting ready for a new debut. Communications and Information Technology Staff have been working very hard with vendor Civics (www.civira.coml to get the site up and running by the end of the calendar year. Changes include a new design and dynamic content to help cities and residents navigate the district. More infonna4on about the launch will be coming soon! Members of the Board Page 5 September 18, 2002 Santa Ana River Interceptor Community Outreach The summer 2002 SARI newsletter was mailed to 3,500 resident and business owners in mid July. This edition included an announcement for the community open house that would be held July 31. Personal letters along with a map were also mailed to the 69 residents that will be most affected by this project, personally inviting them to the community open house where they could hear about the progress being made on the SARI Relocation and/or Protection Project and where staff would be available to answer questions. The open house was held on Wednesday, July 31, at Bryant Ranch Elementary School in Yorba Linda from 4:30 p.m. to 7 p.m. Approximately 30 residents attended. Seal Beach Sand Castle Festival For the fourth year, the Orange County Sanitation District participated at the Seal Beach Sandcastle Festival held on Saturday and Sunday, September 7 and 8, with an estimated 30,000 visitors. Employees volunteered their Saturday or Sunday to help children play"Save the Sea Life." This game teaches children and adults about the pollution problem caused by urban runoff and what they can do to help keep our beaches and ocean clean. Prizes were awarded to everyone who played. The prizes consisted of a Clean Water Willie coloring book, NO DUMPING — DRAINS TO OCEAN magnets, and OCSD pencils. Westside Pump Station As part of the community outreach for maintenance work on our existing facilities, a letter was hand delivered to residents whose houses are located near OCSD's West side pump station in the county unincorporated residential neighborhood of Rossmoor. The letter explained the necessary maintenance work and what residents should expect to hear and see throughout the project. The letter also provided residents with a contact person for any questions and/or concerns they may have. Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Members of the Board Page 6 September 18, 2002 Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt GMP.DTA�MIHGMLETTEHS TO THE BOAH�W B DLETTER DOC Attachments �e►.lan cTrtltOZ National Purchasing Institute, Inc. September 6,2002 4demar4FmomemP'nmemm® P.O.Bu530669 Blake Anderson N®dmou.Ov8905}Ofi69 General Manager _ RI:(702)260-7114 Fax(702)260-7052 Orange County Sanitation District •vxnauonalpurcbadngimtilme.org I OW Ellis Avenue _ Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Dear Mr.Anderson: Re: Achievement of Excellence in Procurement Award In 1995. the National Purchasing Institute (NPI) established a program designed to recognize the achievement of organizational excellence in public procurement. In addition to NPI, the Achievement of Excellence in Procurement is sponsored by the California Association of Public Purchasing Officers (CAPPO), Florida Association of Public Purchasing Officers (FAPPO), and the Institute for Supply Management (ISM). The award is achieved by those organizations that demonstrate excellence in procurement by obtaining a high score on a rating of standardized criteria The program is designed to measure innovation, professionalism, productivity, and leadership attributes of the procurement function. It is my pleasure to notify you that the Procurement Department for the Orange County Sanitation District has earned the Excellence in Procurement Award for 2002. Your organiution's procurement department is one of only seventy-four organizations that achieved this national award. Orange County Sanitation District will be recognized, and the Achievement of Excellence in Procurement Award will be presented, in January, 2003 at the California Association of Public Officers' 86' annual conference in Monterey, California. Congratulations on the Achievement of Excellence in Procurement Award. Sincerely, /��/� P,— C ' Wayne A.Casper,C.P.M. Director of Procurement City of Tucson **and** Chairperson Achievement of Excellence in Procurement Award Committee c: Chris Maher,ContractIPurchasing Buyer Achievement of Excellence in Procurement Award Committee ISM' Certified Purchasing Manager-The Competitive Edge institute for supply management Printed in the Orange County Business Journal August 26, 2002 Page 59 ORANGE COUNTY'S INFRASTRUCTURE A LEGACY IN PERIL By Bob Bein (Bein is founder& CEO of Irvine-based engineering firm— RBF Consulting) What is infrastructure and why it is important for our economy and our quality of life. Not many people give much thought to our infrastructure, unless it doesn't work. We have grown insensitive to its functions and take for granted its reliability in our daily lives. Every day Orange County s vast infrastructure directly affects the life of each of us who live and work here - from the schools our children attend, to the water that comes out of our faucets, to the beaches we swim at, to the trash we discard, and to the roads, waterways, and airports we travel. When it functions as intended, infrastructure works in close harmony with the environment as well as our lifestyles so as to make it possible for us to live efficiently, comfortably, and safely. We recently have had some graphic examples of what happens when we do not pay attention to, and most importantly, do not invest in our infrastructure. Rolling blackouts in our homes and offices, parks that are unmaintained, contaminated beaches closed along our shores, overcrowding of schools, long waits at the airports, potholes that seem to remain forever, and commutes that in some cases seem to last a lifetime. So, who pays for infrastructure? Historically, the Federal government has played a large role in financing infrastructure improvements, but recently their role is diminishing and more and more of the cost is becoming the responsibility of State and local governments to finance needed projects through bonds, sales taxes, or general tax legacy in peril.doc 1 revenues. But the real answer is that we all do, because each and everyone of us are the ones who pay these unpopular taxes and use fees. We must recognize that the cost of our public works is an investment in public assets which will determine the future success of our County. Therefore, every one of us has a stake in their upkeep and operation. So, if we want to highlight this situation, where do we go from here? I believe we need to raise awareness regarding the importance of infrastructure and its impact at all levels. We need to insure that it receives adequate support and funding for the construction, maintenance, and operation of all infrastructure systems now and in the future. The all inclusive "we" means not only the engineers who design and maintain the infrastructure elements, but also those who sit in places of authority over the health and welfare of Orange County residents and workers, as well as the people themselves. The University of California at Irvine (UCI) Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Affiliates has recently stepped forward and taken on the task of preparing and publicizing the Orange County Infrastructure Report Card. With the coordinated efforts of: the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), California Rebuild America Coalition (CaIRAC), American Public Works Association (APWA), Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors of California (CELSOC), and the Orange County Business Council (OCBC), this consortium of concerned professionals in both private and public practice will provide an in depth analysis of the infrastructure conditions that affect, both now and in the future, the economy of the County and the quality of life of its citizens. The Orange County infrastructure Report Card will focus on eight areas: aviation, transportation, schools, water supply, wastewater, solid waste, parks & recreation, and legacy in peril.doc 2 storm water. Working groups, which includes professionals from both the public and private sectors, have been organized to research the public records, to determine the infrastructure condition in each area. After the working groups have completed their research, an Advisory Panel of recognized professionals who are widely regarded as technical experts in each infrastructure category will analyze the data and its interpretation and determine the final letter grades. When the report card is released at the UCI CEE Affiliates Infrastructure Congress that is set for October 10, 2002, then, the real work begins. The results of the report card must be brought to the attention of the policy makers and the citizens of Orange County. Whether an individual community has existed for 150 years or just 10, whether the report card grades seem to apply or not apply to a specific community, all of the citizens of the County must recognize that only by working together on our overall infrastructure needs can we insure the County's economic and environmental future. Fixing a leaking sewer pipe or repairing deteriorating roads has far less political appeal than dedicating a new park, and in fact, some also say we cannot afford to take proper care of all of our infrastructure needs. But what we really can't afford is a patchwork approach that leaves us with gridlock and crumbling infrastructure that cannot support a healthy economy and a rewarding quality of life that has always been the trademark of Orange County. legacy in peril.doc 3 INFRASTRUCTURE CONGRESS Orange County Infrastructure Report Card - THE UNVEILING - Organized by Engineering- INFRASTRUCTURE • UC Irvine Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering- CONGRESS Affiliates • American Society of Civil Engineers • California Rebuild America Coalition a,�v, r`�ry www.ang.uci.edu/civil/affiliates PROGRAM 7:30-8:30 a.m. Registration and Breakfast DATE: 8:30-10 a.m. Thursday, October 10, 2002 • Program Moderator. Robert Bain,CEO, RBF Consulting, 7:30 a.m.—1:00 p.m. ASCE National Past President • Department Welcome—Dr.Jan Scherlig,Professor LOCATION: • HSSOE Update—Dr.Nicolaos G.Alexopoulos, Dean The Beckman Center of the National Methodology&Background—Yazdan Emranl,Chair,OC Academies of Science and Engineering Infrastructure Report Card Executive Committee 100 Academy Road, Irvine,CA 92612 • Economic Impact of Infrastructure on OC—Stan Oftelie, Comer of University Dr.and California Ave. President,OC Business Council Parking Is free • Importance of Infrastructure throughout the History of (see map on reverse side) Civilization—Dr.Hany Farrar,Dept.of Civil Engineering, Cal Poly, Pomona COST: Coffee Break—10:00 a.m. $85 per person with paid reservations by October 1, 2002 10:15-noon Late registration is$95 it space available. The Unveiling of OC Report Card—Robert Bain • Keynote Speaker—Todd Spitzer(Invited),OC Board of REGISTRATION FEE INCLUDES: Supervisors,3i°District breakfast buffet,seminar, coffee break • Town Hall Meeting with Infrastructure Working Committee and lunch. Chairs—C.Stephen Buckram,CEE Affiliates President • Whore Next?—Robert Bein CONTACT PERSON:Jayne Hess at 949.824-4757 or jrhess 0uci.edu Lunch moon Table Discussion with Infrastructure Working Committee Chairs Name: Title: Please make check payable to °UC Regents," Affiliation: and return with the following completed form to: Jayne Hess Address: Infrastructure Congress Department of Civil& Environmental Engineering Engineering Gateway E4130 Telephone: University of California, Irvine Fax: Irvine, CA 92697.2175 Email Address: The Science of Recycling Sewage Sludge TNE NATIONAL ACOEMI95 10 Cifflellf PIOMCIS Publications Directories Search site map Feedback ABOUT THE NATIONAL ACADEMIESEMPLOYMENT - - Idl CONGRESS A WMI Academies Q+-Ed Service A ddw FOR MEMBERS PRESIDENTS CORNER SUBSCRIBE TO Wwr$MEW! Sept.6,2002 For Immediate Release puke of tlen and About 640 words Public IMemaltnn Top Now Man Archba Scbne In In.Readlmn The Science of Recycling Sewage Sludge The National Academic, Do Ed service by Thomas A.Burke Reports&Events From the privies of colonial times to today's regional wastewater treatment This nape b maintained facilities,the safe management of human waste has presented a fundamental by the Natural environmental challenge.Today,the national wastewater treatment Academies Office of infrastructure deals with millions of tons of domestic waste generated annually; News and Public it is a cornerstone afoot efforts to keep the nation's waters clean.To manage the Information ever-increasing volume of sewage,technology has been developed that enables us to recycle some of it to the environment.The recycling plan includes applying Imemet con,editor B g RHicksHickstreated sewage sludge,called biosolids,to agricultural and other lands as fertilizer. Tom Robans Assowte Internal editor The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency regulates biosolids that are applied to land. Approximately 3 million dry tons are used annually.Although land Shelley Solham application has been practiced for decades,it has not been without controversy. online Producer In recent years a number of communities have protested the practice,and there have been anecdotal reports of illness. contact us by e-mail newslifnaeeau Two years ago,at the request of EPA,the National Research Council convened a committee to examine the scientific basis of EPA's regulatory requirements for applying biosolids to land. I served as chair of that committee.and in July the committee's report,Biosalidv Applied to Land.:Advancing Standard.,and Practices, was released.The consensus report Called on EPA to update the scientific basis of its requirements.to improve our knowledge about chemicals and disease-causing pathogens that may be present in biosolids,to evaluate concerns about health effects and exposure,and to make a stronger investment in the agency programs overseeing biosolids application and management.The report outlined positive steps the agency can take to evaluate and manage risks, respond to stakeholder concerns,and protect public health. But because some press accounts focused only on criticisms of EPA's past efforts,and do not fully rellect the findings and recommendations of our report. I would like to clarify our findings. First,we found no evidence of an urgent public health risk from exposure to land-applied biosolids,based on our review of the Scientific literature.Currently. there are no studies documenting adverse health effects from land application of biosolids,even though land application has been practiced for years.But this finding was tempered by the fact that few studies are available on human exposure to biosolids,and that,even when they are investigated Ideally,there are no means of tracking health allegations nationally.Based on the lack of - epidemiological studies and a need to address the public's concerns,we recommended that EPA support studies of populations exposed to biosolids, such as workers or communities near application sites,and investigate reports of http://www4.nationalacademies.org/onpi/oped.ns0(Op-EdByDoc►Du5ED2E I I CD 195F I C:... 9/10/2002 The Science of Recycling Sewage Sludge Page 2 of 2 unusual illness or exposure. Second,we need to update our understanding of the components of biosolids, particularly in light of changes over time in chemical uses,wastewater treatments,and technology.An updated assessment is needed periodically to identify possible changes in the composition of biosolids and to verify that the regulatory requirements are still valid.Therefore,one of our major recommendations is that EPA conduct a new national sewage sludge survey to examine both chemicals and pathogens. Third,EPA has not reassessed the chemical and pathogen standards since it established them in 1993.EPA based its regulations on its understanding of the most hazardous chemical and microbial components at that time.We support this approach,but advised EPA that it needs to periodically reassess whether the existing regulatory standards are supported by the latest scientific data,improved technology,and methods for estimating risk.These periodic assessments will require additional resources at EPA and state agencies. EPA's biosolids regulatory program must move forward w should any regulatory program that has been in place for a number of years.The good news is that better scientific tools are available now to help EPA gather needed data and monitor land-application practices.Science does not remain static,nor should our efforts to protect public health and the environment. Thomas A.Burke,Ph.D.,is a professor of the Bloomberg School of Public Health,Johns Hopkins University.Baltimore. Cwyng&a 2002 rlwfmal� fflr d Sc:4nncn.An rlabrr rnannad. 00 5 !.'th SI r dthe fl R nrb .00t0001 THE UTiOMLL ACaOEMIES # Carraat Prolada Poblieeliesa Directories Saarrb Site Map Feedback http://www4.nationalacademies.org/onpi/oped.nsf/(Op-EdByDocID)/5ED2E l I CD 195F I C:... 9/10/2002 OnaMe County SanItation District Monthly Log of Odor Complaints-2002 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Im yuun 11 SOP 11 Oct N. 11 Dap lan. Me oo If me ors mr If Jun 11 Jul If mo m. �. m. _I 1117 W mto ors oc� mt'"'527 . m. �� �. m. m. mtom. �. m �� m. . �� �IS7 ©I': 7 ©{'If 11 ®If n ©C.9 OCR ®r"7u ml9 �n mra ors mtr� oo mm mr m� mo oM 17 M mr om ®ram ora mo ora mn �. 0 W4 �. wg mo ®mmo �. ) Wi mm ma mr . . o- . 4 H ■■ ■■ �■ �■ ■■ ■■ �■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ M. ` ZL-C L12 CK Orpine�Nunb 3r°ANNUAL IECOC WATER SYMPOSIUM Symposium: Thursday,Sept.26,2002 Water Issue Impacts on Orange County Businesses Wyndham Garden Hotel,714/751.5100 3350 Avenue of The Arts,Costa Mesa,CA Registration/Continental Breakfast: 7:30-8:00 a.m. Representatives from several state,regional and local Symposium: 8:00 a.m.to 2:00 p.m. environmental,health and safety agencies have been- Deli Buffet Lunch:Noon to 1:00 p.m. invited to give brief updates on matters of importance to Q&A,Agency Updates,Networking: 1:00 to 2:00 p.m. the Orange County business community. Symposium Fees: If you wish to attend this Symposium,please fill out the reservation form below and either mail it to IECOC,41 IECOC Members S30 pre-registered or$35 at door Tangerine,Irvine,CA 92618,or in it to 949/651-9415,or Nonmembers $55 Pre-registered or S60 at door email it to ekevs(a crumet.net or register online at www.IECOC.net This Symposium will feature the following distinguished speakers who will present the latest regarding Urban Run Reservations and Prepayments must be received by Off,Slam Water, Waste Water,Drinking Water Supply, 9123102 otherwise the Door Admission must be paid. and an Update on California's Clean Water Programs. Cancelled Reservations must be received by Noon on All of these presentations will focus on describing real and 923102.Late Cancellations CANNOTbe Refunded and Unpaid "No Shows"will be B/12ED as the IECOC must potential impacts to Orange Count tv businesses. commit to pay for lunches per reservations received. Speakers: The IECOC is a nonprofit business coalition that has 'Ron Linsky,Exec Director,Nat'l Water Research Institute provided an open forum for the discussion of ~David Ludwin,Dir.of Engineering,O.C.Sanitation Dist, environmental,health and safety matters since 1985. Ron Wildermuth,Dir.of P.R.,O.C. Water District David Cordero, CRPS,MODOC For more information regarding the Symposium and/or Larry McKenney,Mgr of Watershed,Exec Ofc of O.C. membership,please call (949)651-1068(press 2#and Mark Smythe,Environ Specialist,S.A.Regional Water Bd leave you message)or email to ckeyaC cruznet.net Jobn Allen,Principal,Allen Matkins&Associates —!Stanley Grant,Professor,UCI(invited) Upcoming Luncheon Meeting:November 21,2002. PLEASE FORWARD THIS NOTICE TO OTHERS WHO MAYBE INTERESTED IN THIS SYMPOSIUM Advance Registration for 3m ANNUAL IECOC WATER SYMPOSIUM, Thursday, Sept.26,2002 EMAIL:ckevyFucruznet.net MAIL:41 Tangerine,Irvine,CA 92618 REGISTER ONLINE:www.le c.net FAX:(949)651-9415 Please entet my reservation for the IECOC Luncheon on Sept.26,2002. Enclosed is my check for 5_ Namelride: Company: _ Address: _City/Smte/ZIP: Phone: - FAX: E-Mail Address: My Company/Agency/Instimtion is a member of the IECOC ... YES _ NO _ We wish to join the IECOC Tappan, Jean From: Cabral, Jennifer Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:38 AM To: EMT; Ocean Discharge Permit Team Cc: Communications Subject: Article Wednesday, August 28, 2002 - Bacteria count stable despite bleaching Findings may refute theory of sewage plume causing offshore pollution. August 28, 2002 By PAT BRENNAN The Orange County Register Bacterial measurements along Huntington State Beach have not changed significantly since the Orange County Sanitation District began disinfecting sewage piped into the ocean Aug. 12, a state pollution investigator said Tuesday. That may back up previous findings by scientists: that the district's outfall pipe, which releases treated sewage 4 1/2 miles offshore, contributes little if any bacteria to the shoreline. "What we're seeing is the same signal, basically, even though we're disinfecting, which is further evidence that it isn't the plume," said Ken Theisen of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The most recent bacterial measurements, made last week, appear to weaken a key contention by environmental activists, who have said they believe the sewage plume is a significant contributor to shoreline pollution. A variety of activist groups, led by the Ocean Outfall Group, used that argument and others last month to help persuade the sanitation-district board to upgrade the level of treatment that sewage receives before being released into the ocean. The activists still say the upgrade is worthwhile, whatever the bacterial measurements show. "We want a clean ocean out there," said Jan Vandersloot, leader of the Ocean Outfall Group. Vandersloot also said one set of measurements won't resolve the issue of the plume's role in shoreline contamination. And he said that, in any case, upgrading treatment would result in a cleaner marine environment. Scientists and regulators have been keeping an eye on bacterial levels since the district began t disinfecting its sewage two weeks ago. Many, including Theisen, saw that as a kind of experiment. If the plume really is a major source of bacteria on the shoreline, then bleaching should have caused it to virtually disappear. And, in fact, the highest measurement last week shows a dip in bacterial levels when compared with the highest single reading last month. And on the day of the full moon, when bacterial levels are often highest, the beach was clean. But Theisen said such ups and downs in single samples are not considered statistically significant. The fluctuations are well within the normal range of difference often found from one month to another. Other single-samples in July were close, in some cases identical, to this month's reading, he said. And if the samples are averaged over a period of days - a more reliable comparison - the differences vanish. The plume also betrays itself by its composition of bacterial types - very different from what was found onshore last week, Theisen said. Bottom line: Trouble spots along Huntington State Beach remain contaminated by bacteria at about the same level as before the bleaching, especially during the highest and lowest tides. Questions are still being raised by activists, however, about the sewage plume and the bleaching process. How effective the bleaching is on viruses and protozoa, which also can cause disease, is unknown. That makes some activists worry that bacteria, the signal used by regulators to detect possible sewage and post warnings on beaches, is being removed, but that viruses and protozoa might still remain in the water. And they say that, if the plume did come close to shore, it could mean swimmers would be exposed without realizing it. The latest bacterial measurements may be the concluding chapter in the 2002 fight over sewage treatment, which saw angry protests hundreds strong at district headquarters, one of the most detailed scientific studies of a sewage plume ever conducted on the California coast, and a stunning victory for activists seeking a higher sewage-treatment level. Theisen said that in previous years, for reasons still unknown, shoreline bacteria seem to ebb in the month of September and drop to low levels the remainder of the year. He said he believes a shoreline source or sources are the probable cause of contamination at Huntington State Beach, which still sometimes results in posting of warning signs. The beach is far cleaner than it was just three years ago, when high bacterial readings closed much of the ocean to swimming on Huntington state and city beaches for months during what should have been a busy summer. The 1999 closures focused public attention on beach pollution and resulted in a number of measures to cut contamination. 2 Theisen and other regulators attribute a significant drop in bacterial levels since then to increasing diversion of urban runoff away from the ocean and into sewer systems. Freedom Communications. Inc. Copyright 2gg2 The O:angs County Register Other myOC.com ekes: mVOC.mm I mVOCHomeConnectlon I Sor,.inunoSoume I mVOCSInoleScene I myoclobFineer Jennifer Communications 3 SignOnSanDiego.com>News >Metro --San Diego wins sewage waiver renewal Page 1 of 3 Prudential'sarig ?tcttniT , WL sigQ2018 .com CPRINTTHIS San Diego wins sewage waiver renewal Coast regulators forced to reverse earlier ruling on city's treatment method By Terry Rodgers UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER September 10,2002 LOS ANGELES—Reversing an earlier ruling,the state Coastal Commission yesterday approved San Diego's bid to renew a five-year federal waiver that allows for less stringent sewage treatment. The commission voted 8-1 in favor of the waiver,which,when signed Friday by the federal Environmental Protection Agency,will allow San Diego to continue with its advanced primary treatment method. All but a few of the nation's 16,000 sewage processors are required under the federal Clean Water Act to use a two-step,or secondary,treatment method. San Diego's daily average of 18o million gallons of treated sewage,which is discharged 4.5 miles off Point Loma in 320 feet of water,contains slightly more microscopic solids and bacteria than sewage treated by the secondary method. City officials say the waiver is warranted because ro years of monitoring has not found any evidence that either the Point Loma kelp beds or creatures living on the ocean floor or in the open Ocean are being harmed by the advanced primary effluent. "This decision is a vindication of the city's scientific evidence that was analyzed and validated by the regulators,"said Ted Bromfield of the City Attorney's Office. In April,the commission voted against the waiver on grounds that the city needed to expand its monitoring to deeper water,reduce the amount of microscopic solids within the sewer effluent and sell more of its reclaimed water rather than dumping it into the sea. The April decision by the Coastal Commission drew a strong rebuke from Gov.Gray Davis and criticism from the city,and may have cost Patricia McCoy,an Imperial Beach councilwoman,her seat on the commission after San Diego officials lobbied not to have her reappointed. This time,the commission's hands were tied.Under state law,the commission cannot overrule state water- quality regulators,who recently approved the city's waiver request. - Coastal Commission chairwoman Sara Wan acknowledged the commission's jurisdiction was limited by that decision. http://signonsandiego.printthis.clickability.corr/pt/printThis?clickMap=printThis&fb=Y&tr... 9/10/2002 SignOnSanDiego.com>News>Metro--San Diego wins sewage waiver renewal Page 2 of 3 Commissioner Shirley Dettloff of Huntington Beach,knowing that the commission could not veto the city's waiver,said she felt compelled to cast the lone dissenting vote because San Diego eventually must upgrade its sewage treatment. "We're just putting off something that should be addressed now,"Dettloff said. In a statement read to the commission by his senior policy adviser,San Diego Mayor Dick Murphy said: "Approval of the waiver will allow the city to fix its antiquated sewer pipe system;which is a far greater threat to local beaches than bacteria-laden sewer effluent that is diluted by the ocean and doesn't return to the shore." - Murphy pledged that the city will continue to improve its monitoring program to ensure that the environment is not being harmed. Commissioner Scott Peters,a San Diego councilman,said he felt he and the City Council were doing their best to protect water quality by recently approving a 33 percent sewer rate increase to upgrade sewer pipes that were causing chronic spills. Peters said he could not justify spending up to$2 billion to upgrade the city's sewage treatment system because scientists at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography have said there would be little benefit to the environment. "What possible incentive would they have to tell the city that this is safe if it's not safe?'he said."To me,that is very persuasive." Environmentalists indicated they still may challenge the waiver in court and may try to block the city from obtaining future waivers. Marco Gonzalez,an attorney for San Diego BayKeeper and the San Diego Surfrider Foundation,told the commission he intends to file a lawsuit to force the city to comply with the Ocean Pollution Reduction Act. The 1995 legislation allowed San Diego to file a late application for its initial sewage waiver in exchange for meeting specific sewage treatment goals. Environmentalists also can contest the sewage waiver by filing an appeal with the EPA's environmental review board. Metropolitan Wastewater Department director Scott Tulloch said such an appeal would be counterproductive and divert the city's attention from implementing its tough urban runoff controls and upgrading leaky sewer pipes.Tulloch said those actions will do more to keep local beaches clean than an upgrade of sewage treatment. Alexis Strauss,the EPA's water quality chief for the western region,testified in favor of the waiver yesterday. Leaders of a successful effort to drop Orange County's sewage-treatment waiver attended the hearing and warned San Diego officials that public pressure to upgrade treatment will continue to grow. "A waiver is a dying dinosaur,gasping its last breath,"said Joey Racano of Huntington Beach."Do us a favor. Get rid of the waiver." Terry Rodgers: (619)542-4566; te=.rodgprs@uniontrib.com - http://signonsandiego.printthis.clickability.com/pttprintThis?clickMap=printThi s&fb=Y&u:... 9/10/2002 '1 T AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING September 25, 2002— 7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted In the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there Is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting dale. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation Distrct's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro lam, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 09/25/02 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager 1. 30/30 Monthly Update C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the adjourned meeting held on August 21, 2002 and the regular meeting held on August 28, 2002 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 08/15/02 08/31/02 Totals $9,131,689.83 $7,557,167.91 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director or staff member, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 09/25/02 Page 3 r NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re September 25, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 28, 2002 to be filed. C. Review and consideration of agenda Items considered by the Steering Committee re the September 25, 2002 meeting. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re the September 4, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 4, 2002 to be filed. C. (1)Approve funding for agencies that require additional flow monitoring and updates to Master Plans and Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Plans in the amount of$229,750; (2)Approve funding for the FY 2002-03 Cooperative Projects Program in the amount of$125,000, for the City of Anaheim; (3)Approve time extensions to Cooperative Projects Program contracts with the following cities: Cypress (CP-0103), Fountain Valley(CP-0002 and CP-0104), Garden Grove (CP-0003 and CP-0119), La Habra (CP-0106, CP-0126 and CP- 0127), Orange (CP-0009, CP-0010, CP-0011 and CP-0012), Santa Ana (CP- 0016), Villa Park (CP-0013 and CP-0014); and, (4) Authorize the General Manager to approve time extensions for projects that include flow monitoring which are delayed due to lack of rain. d. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$1,655,000 for Phase II Microfltration Demonstration Project, SP-90, as an alternative treatment to achieve secondary treatment standards; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Project, SP-90, providing for engineering services, equipment testing, design and construction improvements to the existing test facility, in an amount not to exceed $1,555,000, which includes a $200,000 contingency. e. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-18, in Support of Biosolids Recycling, and repealing Resolution No. OCSD 00-05. 09/25/02 Page 4 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re the September 5, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 5, 2002 to be filed. C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, with Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$73,289 and a time extension of 190 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,049,506; and, (2)Accept HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement d. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Clarifiers E &G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1,with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$8,939, increasing the total contract amount to$825,035; and (2)Accept Clarifiers E &G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$500,000 for Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L. M, N, and O at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-39,for a total budget of $15,154,000; and, (2) Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J. K. L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39,with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$133,734 and a time extension of 45 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$10,916.329. f. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements, Job No. SP2001-21,with MMC, Inc., authorizing an addition of $21,020, and a time extension of 58 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$214,121; and, (2)Accept Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements, Job No. SP2001-21, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. g. Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2000-59,with Punchlist Contractors, authorizing an addition of$51,364, increasing the total contract amount to $159,764, and a time extension of 131 calendar days. 09/25/02 Page 5 T h. Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job No. J-71-7, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$91,069, increasing the contract amount to $1,254,569. 1. (1) Approve a budget amendment of$28,792 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66,for a total budget of$2,011,073; and, (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $28,792 and a time extension of 21 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,411,073. j. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 1-10, for an amount not to exceed $3,186,027. k. Approve a budget amendment of$523,000 to Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, for a total project budget, to be reimbursed by Boyle Engineering, in the amount of$969,000. I. Approve Addendum No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc., for additional engineering services for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6, for an additional amount of$199,123, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $333,981. M. (1) Approve a budget amendment of$100,913 for Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, for a total project budget of$572,913; and, (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for engineering services for the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, for an amount not to exceed $490,913. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the September 18, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 18,2002 to be filed. (Minutes to be distributed at 09/25/02 Board Meeting.) C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 2002. 09/25/02 Page 6 y d. Upgrade the following five positions for the Engineering and Operations and Maintenance Departments that were inadvertently not included during the FY02/03 budget process: (1) One vacant Construction Inspector position upgraded to an Engineer position; (2)One vacant Project Specialist position upgraded to an Engineer position; (3) One vacant Principal Engineering Associate position upgraded to an Engineer position; (4) One Limited Term Contract Engineer position changed to a full time Senior Engineer position; and, (5) One Limited Term Contract Engineer position changed to a full time Engineer position. e. (1)Authorize staff to solicit proposals from auditing firms for Internal Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2002-108BD; and, (2) Direct staff to recommend three finalists to be interviewed by the FAHR Committee, and subsequently awarded by the Board of Directors at a future meeting. f. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$171,073 for Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study, Phase 11 and III, for a total budget of$294,500; and, (2)Authorize staff to issue a change order to the purchase contract issued to Carollo Engineers, for an additional amount of$37,600, for a total amount not to exceed $150,600. 15. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re September 16, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on August 12 and August 26, 2002 to be filed. C. Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. decreasing the authorized amount by$2,945,100,from $35,890,804 to a total amount not to exceed $32,954,704,for a change in the Scope of Work in accordance with the Professional Services Agreement for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District sharing the deduct in an equal amount of$1,472,550. 09/25/02 Page 7 f d. Approve an Orange County Water District Issued Task Order to Westin Engineering, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $310,000 for Implementation planning for the Integrated Information System for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No.J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District sharing equal costs of$155,000. 16. (1) Receive and file Addendum No. 7 to the Certified 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report prepared by Environmental Science Associates for the Permanent Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, and (2)Authorize Staff to proceed with the Permanent Short-Tenn Ocean Outfali Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, as required by Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R8 2002-0055. 17. Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-19, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Amending Table H of Ordinance No. OCSD-18 re Wastehauler Charges for Use a. Verbal report of General Counsel b. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-19 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) C. Motion to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-19 as an urgency measure, to be effective Immediately. 18. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary b. Reconvene in regular session 09/25/02 Page 8 t 1. Confer with General Counsel and Representatives of Regulatory Agencies concerning one (1) matter,which in the opinion of Counsel, based upon existing facts, could lead to potential litigation relating to the District's discharge pursuant to its NPDES Permit. (California Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1) C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 19. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 21. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for October 23, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. 22. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 Director of Finance Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 Director of Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 Director of Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 Director of Operations S Maintenance Bob Ooten (714) 593-7020 Director of Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714) 593-7400 Director of Information Technology Patrick Miles (714) 593-7280 1 Communications Manager Lisa Murphy (714) 593-7120 Assistant to General Manager Greg Mathews (714) 593-7104 General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff (714) 564-2605 G:\wp.dta\agenda0oard Agendas\2002 Board Agendas\042402 agenda.doc 6I I Orange County Sanitation District Orange County Water District MINUTES Joint BOARD MEETING AUGUST 21 , 2002 3 AN I Tgr�oy 4 � C7 �I 90r C� p ��*• ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 ' 08/21/02 ROLL CALL A joint meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District and the Board of Directors of the Orange County Water District was held on August 21, 2002, at 6:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken,Chair Tom Daly X Steve Anderson,Vice Chair Steve Simontan A Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Laurann Cook Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue David Shawver X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley A Beth Krom Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater A Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi A Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan A Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams A Jerry Sigler Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager, Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Oolen; Gary Streed; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary,Jim Herberg;Wendy Sevenandt OTHERS PRESENT:Thomas L Woodruff, General Counsel; Brad Hogin; Don Hughes; Randy Fuhrman;Joey Rarano; Larry Porter, Steve Smith; Don Calkins; Bob McVicker, Dennis Kasper, Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 O8/21/02 Bruce Chalmers; Tom & Marge Englano; Dennis MacLain;Abdul Rashidi; Mike Wellborne; Doug Traub; Dennis Baker; Judith M. Gielow; Keith Lyon; Craig Miller PUBLIC COMMENTS Joey Racano addressed the Directors expressing concern with water quality Issues. He also expressed concern with chlorination of the District's effluent. JOINT BOARD WORKSHOP 1. Groundwater Replenishment System Protect Review Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, commented that educating the public on the project must remain a high priority. Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported that the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District met jointly in March 2001, and voted to move forward with the design of the groundwater replenishment system project. The dedsion was monumental to both agencies to commit to the most significant water reclamation project undertaken in the state of California. This meeting was to update the Directors on the development of the project since March 2001. Virginia Grebbien, General Manager of the Orange County Water District, noted she was looking forward to working with the Sanitation District on the project. A. Status Report Bill Everest, Project Manager for the Groundwater Replenishment Project, discussed current and projected water needs for Orange County and the Southern California area, and provided an overview of the project and status report on the final design. B. Public Information & Education Program Status Ron Wildernuth , Orange County Water District Public Information Officer, provided the Directors with an overview of the public Information and educational program for the project, citing previous and current activities, and reviewed the proposed advertising program. C. Project Cost Update Bill Everest reviewed the costs associated with the project, and noted that the operation and maintenance is a major cost component for the project. It was also noted that staff recently received an escalated construction cost estimate to factor into the overall cost of the project. Questions and comments by Directors followed with direction to staff to provide more detailed information on the major cost increases for the project. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 08/21/02 D. Project Schedule Update Mike Markus, Orange County Water District Associate General Manager, reviewed the project schedule. He also reviewed options to fast-track the project with individual contracts and the advantages of utilizing combined contracts. E. Status of Joint Powers Agreement Blake Anderson, General Manager, summarized the development of the draft Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement which has undergone more than 30 revisions. He also reported on the progress of outstanding issues that must be resolved in order to approve the agreement. The agreement is targeted for approval by both agencies in October. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m. Secretary o t e Board o ire or of Orange Cou ty Sanitati District G1wp.dWagendMBoard Minutest2002 Board MmutW042402 minutes.d= ,1 Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING AUGUST 28, 2002 N� SAN7Tgr�0 a � et � 0 FC�'yC THE ENV��O ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 08/28/02 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on August 28, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken, Chair Tom Daly X Steve Anderson,Vice Chair Steve Simonian X Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Brian Brady Darryl Miller Patricia Campbell X Paul Yost X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman Laurann Cook X Larry Crandall A Brian Donahue David Shawver A Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer A John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall X ABce B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley X Beth Krom Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:; Bob Ghirelii; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Dolan; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Paula Zeller, David Usher, Simon Watson; James Hauler;John Myer; Joe Park OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Alternate Director Arlene Schafer; Irwin Haydock; Jan Vanderstoot; Larry Porter, Greg Jewell; Marilyn Brokenshire; Mark Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 • 08/28/02 Brokenshire; Darrell A. Nolta; Terry Lane; Richard Monfils; Ken Erbeznik; Dean Reinemann; Don Hughes PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons expressed concern on level of treatment and ocean discharge issues: Larry Porter, Jan Vandersloot, Greg Jewell, Darrell A. Nolta. Mark Brokenshire and Ken Erbeznik spoke regarding their concerns over the relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair McCracken reported that she was looking for someone to serve as the District's representative on the Council of Governments. The standing committees meeting schedule was then reviewed, noting that the FAHR Committee would be meeting on September W, and the Ad Hoc Committee for Urban Runoff was tentatively scheduled to meet on September 26' . Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, recognized employees Philip Sullivan, Jim Hauler and John Myer for their quick reaction and responses for those injured in the electrical accident at Plant No. 2 on August 61h, and presented them with Resolutions of Commendation. Ms. Tomko reported that the Emergency Medical Response Team was formed in 1997 with five members, and has been expanded to now include 18 members who respond to any incident at the District. The team's training includes CPR, first aid, American Red Cross Emergency Responder training, oxygen administration, use of automatic external defibrillation, blood-bome pathogens training, and confined space rescue. Richard Monfils, a representative of the American Red Cross, presented the District's Emergency Medical Response Team with an "Award for Excellence in Disaster Preparedness." He stated the award was given for the District's proactive stance and creation of the emergency medical response team. The Emergency Medical Response Team presented the award to the Board of Directors and thanked the Board and the management staff for their support. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reported that Blake Anderson was on vacation. Mr. Streed noted a new item listed on the agenda entitled 30/30 monthly update. This will be on the agenda monthly until the District achieves 30/30 treatment levels. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, updated the Directors on the 30/30 report. The purpose of the report is to give the Directors an update on staffs progress in carrying out the July 17' decision to achieve secondary treatment standards. On July W, staff debriefed on the resolution that was adopted and created a 30/30 action team. The purpose of the team is to Minutes for Board Meeting , Page 4 08/28/02 develop a work plan to implement full secondary treatment as quickly as possible. A quick review was provided on some of the major activities that are underway: • Permit negotiations and permit renewal application. A meeting with representatives of EPA and RWQCB will be held on August 291°in San Francisco to discuss options available to the District to develop a transition permit to get from the current level of treatment to secondary standards. They will also discuss what type of public review process the District will utilize to involve stakeholders in the process of overseeing the permit renewal and the schedule staff will embark upon to build facilities necessary for secondary treatment. • Legislation is being pursued to shield the District from mandatory state penalties beyond the five-year grace period that is presently allowed in state law. The District is seeking legislative language change that would give the District up to ten years for the sole purpose of achieving secondary treatment standards. At the Steering Committee a report was given by Scott Baugh who is assisting in this issue in Sacramento. • Staff is ramping up existing secondary facilities, pushing as much wastewater through secondary treatment as possible, as well as utilizing the disinfection plan. The Directors were referred to a memo included in their meeting folders from Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance, that describes where things currently stand. • Disinfection went online August 12, 2002, which is the date the new permit requirements became effective. Staff is meeting disinfection goals and permit requirements for chlorine residual in the effluent. • Planning for move to meet secondary treatment discharge standards includes developing a schedule for construction of secondary treatment facilities, and incorporates a$1.9 billion capital improvement program. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, reported AB 1969 passed through the Senate Committee. It provides a 10-year exemption from penalties under the minimum mandatory penalty provision of the law for secondary treatment standards, but will not protect against citizens or third party suits for any reason. He noted that the District objected to language contained in the bill inserted by the Senate Environmental Committee that stated the legislation was necessary due to the unique pollution problems associated with the discharge of the wastewater by Orange County Sanitation District The District provided alternative generic language but it was not included in the final form that was passed. Mr. Woodruff also reported the Steering Committee had a closed session that evening regarding a petition filed by Natural Resources Defense Council with the State Water Resources Control Board concerning the District's recently amended NPDES permit. i Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 ° 08/28/02 APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held July 17, 2002 be deemed approved, as mailed. Directors Larry Crandall, Debbie Cook, Tod Ridgeway and Paul Yost abstained. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 07/15/02 07/31/02 Totals $9,546,722.65 $24,383,160.77 Director Mark Leyes abstained. Director Alice Jempsa abstained on Warrant No.46247, and Director Russ Patterson abstained on Warrant No. 45605. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Allen Denson requesting annexation of 1.23 acres to the District in the vicinity of Meads Drive and Acre Place in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-16, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-25- Denson Annexation). NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the August 28, 2002 meeting. Chair McCracken reported that Bob Ghirelli provided the Committee an update on fat, oil and grease management issues. He also provided the Steering Committee with an initial recommendation to seek federal grants for funding portions of the District's capital improvement program. The Steering Committee directed staff to keep Directors informed of the services of Eric Saperstein, lobbyist in Washington, DC, in seeking grants. Mr. Ghirelli also provided an update on ocean permit issues. The Employee Activity Committee will be installing and dedicating a new flag pole and memorial plaque at Plant No. 1 main entrance on September 11 , in memory of those who lost their lives last September 11°. A plaque will also be installed at Plant No. 2. Short ceremonies will be held at both locations. Minutes for Board Meeting , Page 6 O8/28/02 Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, discussed proposed changes to the Rules of Procedure resolution. Staff will also prepare a "primer for Directors that will provide an overview of standard policies and procedures for the Directors' information. Chair McCracken reported that Director Bankhead had been appointed Chair of the Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee. This committee will be meeting on Thursday, September 26, beginning at 4:00 p.m. Staff has been working on secondary treatment upgrades since action was taken on July 170. Staff has developed the tens"30/30 Action Plan", which reflects secondary standards required by the Federal Clean Water Act, which are 30 parts/million of suspended solids and 30 partstmillion of biochemical oxygen demand. Jim Colston reported on staffs progress on this action plan. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 26, 2002 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the August 7,2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 7. 2002 to be filed. Director Kawashima abstained. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a service agreement with MEC Analytical Systems, Inc.for Analysis of Benthic Infauna Samples, Specification No. S-2002-85BD, to provide for ocean monitoring services, in an amount not to exceed $148,983,for a one-year period with four one-year renewable options if mutually acceptable contract terms can be negotiated. Director Kawashima abstained. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Digester#5 Cleaning Services at Plant No. 1, Specification No. SS-2002-107, with Northwest Industrial Scrub, Inc. authorizing an addition of$43,750, increasing the total amount not to exceed $142,570. Director Kawashima abstained. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Consulting Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell, providing for development of a Needs Assessment Study, O&M Manual, Specification No. CS-2001-67BD, for an amount not to exceed $392,000. Director Kawashima abstained. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 ° 08/28/02 f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$340,000 for additional mixers and related construction of improvements for Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study, Project SP-74, for a total budget of$1,290,000; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Cathcart, Garcia, and von Langan Engineers to provide additional engineering services for the Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study, Project SP-74,for an additional amount of$20,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $100,000; and (3)Authorize the General Manager to award a construction contract for improvements to the Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector, Project SP-74, to the lowest responsible bidder without further Board action, in an amount not to exceed $840,000. Director Kawashima abstained. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 101058 issued to Cytec for the Purchase of Anionic Polymer, Specification No. C-149, in the amount of$20,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $202,100. Director Kawashima abstained. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Patterson, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the August 1, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 1, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46,with Ken Thompson, Inc., authorizing an addition of$491,060, increasing the total contract amount to $6,207,126. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Air Compressor Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2001-02, with R. Fox Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$24,930 and a time extension of 95 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $312,630: and (2)Accept Air Compressor Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2001-02, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept Interplant Microwave Data Transmission Project, Job No. SP-44, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 0 O8/28/02 f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept Patio Area Upgrade at Plant No.1, Job No. SP1999-075, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-17, approving an agreement with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Agreement No. 700-01-006)to conduct Ef0uent Pathogen Reduction Altematives Plan, Job No.J-40-6, and provide research funding to the District in the amount of$250,000. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$20,000 for Interim Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J-40.8, for a total project budget of$707,340; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee for additional engineering services for Interim Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J-40-8, for an additional amount of$30,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $627,340. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Award a Professional Services Agreement to Integrated Program Management Consultants for program management consultant services in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000,for a period not to exceed five years; and (2)Establish an initial FY2002-03 Program Management Consultant budget not to exceed $3,935,274. Directors Steve Anderson and Mark Leyes abstained. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Brady, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the August 14, 2002 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 14, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 2002. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2002. 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Russ Patterson, representative of the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on August 26, 2002. Director Patterson reported that an operating agreement should be ready for approval soon. All major issues are agreed on, and should be approved by the Joint Cooperative i Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 P 08/28/02 Committee at the September 161" meeting. It should be placed on our agenda for the October agenda cycle. The Chair ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 8, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve the plans and specifications for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline, and ratify authorizing the General Manager of the Orange County Water District to solicit bids for said project; and (2)Grant the Orange County Water District authority to award a contract for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline in an amount not to exceed $3,300,000 to the low bidder and to approve change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed 5% of the original contract amount,with the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District paying equal shares of the contract price. 16. There was no closed session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m. . l //-/-4 Secretary of(the Board of actors of Orange County Saniiatio istrict G1wp.di%%gendat8oard Mlnutest2002 Board MlnuWM042402 minutes.da Claims Paid From 07/01/02 to 07/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 45428 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. $ 65,451.37 Professional Services J-73-2 45429 Boyle Engineering Corporation 56.425.63 Engineering Services 1.2-4 45430 Brown&Caldwell 207.126.05 Engineering Services 241,J-25-6&Pl-37 45431 Carollo Engineers 672,697.00 Professional Services P2-66,J-87,P1-60,P2-60&SP-90 45432 Cortech Engineering 36,333.30 (2)Pumps 45433 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 94,328.52 Data Processing 45434 Cylec Industries 36,435.60 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 45435 CH2M Hill 36,251.40 Professional Services J-71-4 46436 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 31,681.07 Cationic Polymer Spec. No.C-2001-42 45437 Dell Direct Sales, L.P. 47,127.71 (25)Computers&(10)Cases 45438 Fluor Enterprises, Inc. 90,848.00 Professional Services J-84 45439 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 41,165.41 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 46440 IKON Office Solutions, Inc. 804,043.44 Computer Hardware/Software, Maintenance&Support 45441 J.D. Edwards 58.907.99 Computer Maintenance&Support 45442 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 142,045.76 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 45443 Lee&Ro, Inc. 77.003.22 Prof.Services 5.49,5-51,5.52.J-71-7&H.B. Purchase Improv.,Fiber Optics 45444 Municipal Water Dist,of Orange County 35.665.75 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 45445 Orange County Water District 56,301.50 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 45446 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 39,814.55 Sodium Hypochlorite 45447 R.W.Beck 73,800.00 Professional Services P1-90 45448 Southern Calif Coastal Water Research 298,000.00 Joint Powers Agreement-Membership Contribution 45449 Southern California Edison 72,644.73 Power 45450 Tatra Tech,Inc. 25,901.60 Professional Services J-90&Sewer Pipe Replacement in Tustin, Irvine&SA 45451 The Lewis Group 44,632.30 Consulting Service-Capital Project Management Process 45452 Tole Ranch/Magan Farms 182,785.66 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 45453 U.S.Geological Survey 148,825.91 Professional Services J-85 45454 U.S.Peroxide 45.253.72 Prof.Services-Collection Sys.Odor&Corrosion Chemical Add. Demo. Study 45465 Voided Check - - 45456 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 59.410.39 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 45457 Waste Markets Corp. 60.758.39 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mat'I, Removal 45458 Water Environment Research Foundation 75,440.00 Membership 45459 Woodru0,Spradlin&Smart 104,736.50 Legal Services MO 7-26.95 46460 The Yakima Company 77,368.22 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 45461 Adams/Mallory Construction Co., Inc. 45.951.41 Construction J-80 45462 California Bank&Trust 63,259.00 Construction J-33.1A, Retention 45463 J W Contracting Corpoa8on 477,615.00 Construction P2.60 45464 Margate Construction, Inc. 1,388,994.00 Construction P2-39,J-71.7,P2-85-1 &Pl-37 45465 Mike Prlich&Sons 33,734.73 Construction-Junction Structure Upgrade 45466 Southern Contracting Company 569,327.00 Construction J-33-1A 45467 Union Bank of California 53,068.00 Construction P2.60, Retention 45468 Urbantec Engineering,Inc. 254,684.00 Construction J-66 45469 A-Plus Systems 610.00 Notices&Ads 45470 Abesco 465.97 Maintenance Materials Page 1 of 8 FYHIRIT a Claims Paid From 07/01/02 to 07/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45471 Great American Printing Co. 4.796.65 Stationery&Office Supplies 46472 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 3,606.01 Prof.Svrs.-CSG Fuel Mixing For Emission Control&Inst.Supplies 45473 Agilenl Technologies, Inc. 496.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 45474 Airborne Express 52.25 Air Freight 45475 Airgas Safety 1,227.03 Safety Supplies 45476 American Airlines 7.386.34 Travel Services 45477 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 895.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 45478 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs, Inc. 20,015.00 Toxicity Testing&Bacterial Reduction Study 45479 Ashbrook Corporation 211.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45480 Awards&Trophies Company 51.88 Plaques&Trophies 45481 ACS Hydraulics, Inc. 724.50 Motor Repairs&Testing 45482 Arrow Truck Bodies&Equipment,Inc. 1,592.56 Powder Coating Services 45483 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 69.73 Telephone Service 45484 A T&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,632.63 Cellular Telephone Service 45485 AT&TWireless Services 7,751.85 Wireless Phone Services 45486 Basic Chemical Solutions 280.40 Chemicals 45487 Battery Specialties 599.21 Batteries 45488 Bell Land Surveying 2,550.00 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 45489 BioSphedcal Instruments, Inc. 172.52 Instrument Maint. 45490 Bk Vir Laboratories 1,264.00 Lab Analyses 46491 Black&Veatch Corporation 24,263.75 Professional Services P2-85 45492 Calolympic Safety 351.37 Safety Supplies 45493 Cellrol,Inc. 21,550.32 Electrical Parts&Supplies 45494 Cad Warren&Co. 126.29 Insurance Claims Administrator 45495 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1.282.20 Copier Lease 45496 Comm Vault Systems, Inc. 13.973.02 Computer Hardware/Software 45497 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 12.375.00 Professional Services-Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures 45498 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 4,737.44 Electrical Parts&Supplies 45499 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 226.47 Plumbing Supplies 45500 Cooper Energy Services 5,424.97 Engine Supplies 45501 Cooper Energy Systems 832.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45502 Cornerstone Systems 5,928.25 Software Maintenance 46503 Corporate Express 615.02 Office Supplies 45504 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 212.28 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45505 County Sanitation Diets of Los Angeles 3,400.00 Olfactometry Lab Analyses 45506 County Wholesale Electric Co. 126.74 Electrical Parts&Supplies 45507 Crane America Services,Inc. 2.500.00 Crane Services 45508 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Maint.Agreement-Con Gen Water Sottner System 45509 CALPERLA 990.00 Human Resources Training Registration 45510 CAPIO:Calif Assoc.of Public Info.Offcls. 175.00 Membership 45511 CGVL Engineers 828.31 Professional Services P1-94&Roadway Upgrade 45512 CH2MHIII 3,087.48 Engineering Services J-40.6 45513 CWEA-TCP 129.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 45514 Dapper Tire Co. 687.95 Truck Tires Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 07/01/02 to 07/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45515 Del Mar Analytical 7,238.00 Biosolids Analysis 45516 Delta Packaging Products, Inc. 134.22 Lab Pans&Supplies 45517 DigtPhoto 39.27 Photographic Services 45518 Dionex Corporation 1,623.15 Lab Pads&Supplies 45519 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 155.57 Paint Supplies 45620 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 222.92 Electrical Supplies 45521 Eberhard Equipment 1,134.10 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 45522 Ecology Control Industries 934.60 Hazardous Waste Disposal 45523 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 103.84 Medical Screening 45524 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 3,701.56 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-May&June 45525 Enchanter, Inc. 5,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 45526 Environmental Science Associates 10,849.44 Professional Services J-40-5 45527 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,019.40 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 45528 FedEx Corporation 147.80 Air Freight 45529 Fitter Supply Company - 61.43 Fitters 45530 Fisher Scientific Company, LLC. 10,381.97 Lab Pans&Supplies 45531 Flo-Systems,Inc. 10,394.64 Pump Supplies 46532 Foodcre8 Coffee&Refreshment Services 36262 Meeting Supplies 45533 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 63.88 Paint Supplies 46634 Franklin Covey 27.37 Office Supplies 45535 FLW,Inc. 2,360.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45536 Garrett-Callahan Company 282.01 Tank&Cover 45537 Gastech 2,154.39 Instrument Parts&Supplies 45538 Gold Systems, Inc. 1,833.75 Professional Services-Data Migration&STORET Interface Application 45539 W W Grainger, Inc. 394.83 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46540 Governmental Accounting Standards Board 110.00 Publication 45541 Westmark Sales, Inc./GLI International 637.18 Instrument Supplies 4SS42 GMF Sound,Inc. 192.61 Electrical Parts 45543 Edwards Systems Technology 6,271.77 Service Agreement-Fire Alarm System 45644 Haaker Equipment Company 603.54 Repair&Maintenance Materials&Services 45545 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc- 658.35 Instrument Parts&Supplies 45546 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 2225 Meeting Expenses 45547 Hit Brothers 18.103.36 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 45548 Home Depot 174.16 Small Hardware 45549 City of Huntington Beach 2,507.70 Water Use 45550 Imaging Express 58.70 Printer Maintenance 46551 Impulse 190.91 Lab Supplies 45552 Industrial Distribution Group 2,319.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45553 Industrial Fabrics Corp. 14,800.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45554 Information Resources 1,500.00 Human Resources Service 45555 Innedine Engineering 1,185.00 OCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 45556 Innovative Engineering 2,839.21 Electrical Parts&Supplies 45557 Integrated Sign Assoc. 2.129.14 (6)Non-illuminated Custom Panel Signs 45558 Invensys Systems,Inc. 10,662.48 Instrument Supplies Page 3 of 8 FXHIRIT A Claims Paid From 07/01/02 to 07/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45559 J.O.Tucker and Son, Inc. 2,058.13 Instrument Supplies 45560 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 19,300.57 Construction-Coal Tarring of Clarifier Flight Structural Support,3-2-1 &Pipe Installations 45561 Jays Catering 1,166.30 Meeting Expenses 45562 Johnstone Supply 119.22 Electrical Supplies 45563 K.P.Lindstrom, Inc. 7,880.34 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12.9.90 45594 Katmar Promotions 1,685.76 Plastic Bags 45565 Kett US 8,318.30 Equipment Rentals 45566 Labeltronix 149.60 Stationary&Office Supplies 46567 Law/Crandall 8,204.50 Professional Services-Soil Testing J-33.1,Pl-37&P2.60 45565 Linter Company c/o Gerald Jones 4,298.45 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22.99 4SS69 Lina-X Protective Coatings 682.00 Utility Truck Bed Uner 45570 Lucci's 443.04 Meeting Expense 45571 LA Chemical 3,518.17 Caustic Soda 45672 M.J. Schiff&Associates, Inc. 576.00 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 45573 Manleys Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 355.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45574 Measurement Variables, Inc. 968.57 Electrical Supplies 45575 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 285.54 Mechanical Seal 45575 Media Clips, Inc. 70.00 Notices&Ads 45577 Medlin Controls Co. 1,885.55 Instrument Supplies 45578 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tula Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 45579 Mike Prlich&Sons 16,774.61 Construction-Force Main Repairs at Bitter Point Pump Station 45580 Minadk 827.17 Instrument Supplies 45881 Mission Uniform Service 4,111.23 Uniform Rentals 45582 Mitchell Instrument Co. 150.00 Instrument Supplies 45583 MDS Consulting 4,500,00 Professional Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 45584 N.Glantz&Son 1,050.00 Reflective Sign Tape 45585 Business Training&Development Services 1,950.00 On-Site Training-'Criticism&Discipline' 45586 Newark Electronics 46.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45587 Nexlel Communications 1.166.76 Cellular Phones&Air Time 45588 NCG Porter Novelll, Inc. 7,537.50 Prof.Services-Public Relations 45589 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,01e.10 Office Supplies 45590 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 946.56 Electrical Parts&Supplies 45591 Oracle Corporation-Support/Selss 13,877.84 Software Licenses&Support 45592 Orange County Business Council 10.000.00 Membership 45593 Oxygen Service Company 3,170.48 Specialty Gases 45594 OCS Reprographics 9,514.09 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 45595 OCE-USA,Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Maim. 45596 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 1,878.13 Electrical Supplies 45587 Pacific Mechanical Supply 301.70 Plumbing Supplies 45588 Pacific Parts&Controls 2,143.08 Instrument Supplies 45599 Pacific States Chemical, Inc. 1,416.14 Chemicals 45600 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 526.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45601 Parker Supply Company 4,094.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45602 Parkhouse Tire Co. 228.64 Tres Paga 4 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 07/01/02 to 07/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45603 Partners Consulting Services 7,320.OD Help Desk Consulting Services 45604 Parts Unlimited 77.60 Truck Supplies 45605 Paulus Engineering, Inc. 13,187.00 Construction-Street Repairs at Euclid&Imperial 45606 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 182.66 Lab Parts&Supplies 45607 Port Supply 96.96 Safety Supplies 456DB Power Lift Corporation 1,275.00 On-Site Forklift Training 45609 Power Machine Co. 451.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45610 Primary Source 4293.82 Office Fumfture 45611 Projects Partners 13,498.42 Temporary Employment Services 45612 Protech Petroleum Services, Inc. 2,687.37 Line Unk Testing&Repairs 45613 Pump Engineering 2,029.99 Pump 45614 Refiastar Bankers Security Lee Ins. 8.423-46 Employee Life Ins., Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ins. Payroll Deductions 45615 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 3.110.94 Pump Supplies 45616 RPM Electric Motors 977.48 Motor Repairs 45617 S&J Supply Co., Inc. 1,258.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45618 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 4,500.00 Construction-Manhole Repair&Rehabilitation of Concrete Sudaces 45619 Saybolt L.P. 600.00 Air Analyses 45620 Schneider Electric 8,989.76 Software Maint.Agreement 45621 Schwing America,Inc. 2,917.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45622 Scott Instruments nJo JPR Systems, Inc. 3,992.45 Instrument Parts&Supplies 45623 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 20.04 Demurrage Charges 45624 Shurauck Sales&Engineering 589.61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45625 Sigma Chemical Co. 82.84 Lab Supplies 45626 Smardan Supply Company-Valley Cities 443.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45627 SoftChoice 3,853.45 Software 45628 Southern California Water 70.42 Water Use 45629 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 130.00 Carpet Cleaning Services 45630 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 202.10 Stationery&Office Supplies 45631 Strategic Diagnostics,Inc. 1.112.43 Lab Parts&Supplies 45632 Summit Steel 730.01 Metal 45633 Sunset Industrial Parts 2,327.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45634 System Improvements 995.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 45635 SAWPA 3.000.00 Prof.Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 45636 Techno Coatings 8,590.00 Painting Services-Bldg. K,Pit. 1 45637 Terminix International Co. 275.00 Pest Control 45638 Osprey Marine Management 450.00 Lab Services 45639 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 918.41 Mechanical Supplies 45640 Thrifty Oil Company 2,002.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 45641 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 3,580.00 Elevator Maintenance 45642 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 45643 Tran Consulting Engineers 12,461.00 Engineering Services 1-2-4 45644 The Trans Company 111.69 Electrical Pans&Supplies 45645 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 58.43 Truck Supplies 45646 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 782.50 Lab Services Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 07/01/02 to 07/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45647 TCH Associates,Inc. 107.89 Lab Supplies 45648 Ultra Scientific 690.33 Lab Pads&Supplies 45649 United Parcel Service 184.81 Parcel Services 450W Defense Finance and Accounting 18,125.16 Professional Services J-85 45651 UC Regents 32.06 Publication 45652 US Equipment Co., Inc. 4,148.36 (2)Heat Exchangers 45653 Vallen Safety Supply Company 90.92 Safety Supplies 45654 Valley Cities Supply Company 223.47 Mechanical Supplies 45655 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 1,957.21 Mechanical Repairs 45656 Varian Instrument Group 316.74 Lab Parts&Supplies 45657 Vedmn California 1,629.61 Telephone Services 45658 Verne's Plumbing 1.761.00 Testing&Certification of Backflow Devices at Pits. 1 &2 8 Pump Stations 45659 Village Nurseries 18.31 Landscaping Supplies 45660 Vortex Industries, Inc. 490.89 Door Repair 45661 V L Systems, Inc. 2,125.00 Network Support 45662 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 1,939.79 Lab Parts&Supplies 45663 The Wackenhut Corporation 13,459.46 Security Guards 45664 WaAe Sanitary Supply 80.79 Janitorial Supplies 46665 Wesco Dlstrlb8lon,Inc. 46.50 Instrument Supplies 45666 Wilson Supply,Inc. 4,629.03 Electrical Parts&Supplies 45667 Xerox Corporation 8,007.71 Fax&Copier Leases,Maintenance&Support 45668 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 3,987.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Pit. 1 45669 Daniel T.Brock 474.94 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46670 Patrick B.Carnahan 457.62 MeetingfTralning Expense Reimbursement 45671 Kimberly C.Christensen 109.41 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 45672 Steven R. DeWilde 153.18 Meetingtrraining Expense Reimbursement 46673 Norbert Gata 386.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 45674 Ingrid G.Hellebrand 1,147.67 MeelingrTraining Expense Reimbursement 46675 Shamshad Hyder 638.87 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 45676 Michael D.Moore 1,570.20 MeetingRralning Expense Reimbursement 45677 Douglas M.Stewart 1,637.74 Meelingrlraining Expense Reimbursement 45678 Robert J.Taylor 100.00 Mee0ng/Training Expense Reimbursement 45679 Robert C.Thompson 531.30 Meeling/Tmining Expense Reimbursement 45680 Best Buy&Lucena, Efran 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 45681 Gateway&DeAnda, Bernardo 1,650.95 Employee Computer Loan Program 45682 Orange County Sanitation District 1,120.13 Petty Cash Reimb. 45683 City of Anaheim 368.654.00 OCSD Settlement Share-Relocation of Anaheim Relief Sewer 45654 Orange County Sanitation District 32,373.43 Workers Comp.Reimb. 45685 Orange County Sanitation District 459,850.42 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 45686 State Board Oi Equalization 37,791.00 Sales Tax 45687 Airges Safety 447.56 Safety Supplies 45688 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 45689 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 40.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 45690 Court Order 160.00 Wage Garnishment Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 07/01/02 to 07/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45691 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 643.03 Electrical Pads&Supplies 46692 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1.972.16 Plumbing Supplies 45693 Crawford Compressor Rebuilders 24,971.06 (1)Air Compressor 45694 CASA 600.00 Admin.Services&Tech. Services Meeting Registration 45695 California Special Districts Association 334.00 Membership 45696 Dan Siwulac Communications Marketing 1,125.00 SARI Newsletter Postage 45697 Edward P.Grech Trust 442.92 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 45698 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 45699 Hydrotex 4.435.15 Luba Oil 45700 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 601 3.177.75 Dues Deduction 45701 Kings County Tax Collector 10.214.82 Property Taxes 45702 Ufestyles 250.00 Employee Health Fair Screenings 45703 Lytle Screen Printing 418.34 Orange County Fair T-Shirts 45704 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 6,802.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45705 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Garnishment 45706 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 461.40 Fittings 45707 OCEA 422.86 Dues Deduction 46708 Pacific Bell 69.80 Telephone Services 45M Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 46710 Court Order 295.00 Wage Gamishment 4sm Peace Officers Council of CA 1,044.00 Dues Deduction 45712 Road Works,Ix. 180.00 O&M Training Registration 46713 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 45714 So.Cal.Gas Company 6.754.11 Natural Gas 45715 Southern California Edison 15,955.15 Power 45716 Summit Steel 1,041.78 Metal 45717 Summit Training Source, Inc. 1,401.00 Safety Training Supplies 45718 SAWPA 3,000.00 Santa Ana Watershed Group 46719 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3,797.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45720 The Unisource Corporation 6,822.15 Stationery&Office Supplies 46721 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 45722 Verizon California 978.19 Telephone Services 45723 VSA,Inc.&Health Fairs of America 2,960.10 Employee Health Fair Screenings 45724 Wyatt Data Services 1.197.00 Publication 45725 Nicholas J.Arhontes 152.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 45726 Norman Eckenrode 330.18 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 45727 Vladimir A. Kogan 1,502.07 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 45728 Henry R. Salgado 1,787.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 45729 Matthew P.Smith 193.62 Meetingfrralning Expense Reimbursement 45730 James C. Mullins 510.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 45731 Ernest N.Veboah 513.74 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 45732 The National Purchasing Institute 300.00 Excellence In Procurement Application Fee 45M Postmaster 175.00 Past Office Box Rental Total Accounts Payable-Warrants S 8,427,659.08 Page 7 of 8 FXHIRIT A Claims Paid From 07/01/02 to 07/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 27086.27208 Employee Paychecks $ 158.924.10 Biweekly Payroll 07/10/02 27209.27210 Interim Paychecks 942.98 Reissue Stale Dated Check&Adjustment 74572-75039 Direct Deposit Statements 794,984.64 Biweekly Payroll 07/10/02 Total Payroll Disbursements It 954,651.72 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 120,270.58 Societe Generale June Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 43,941.27 June Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 164,211.85 Total Claims Paid 07/01/02-07115/02 $ 9,546,722.65 Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 45734 American Express $ 29,772.73 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 45735 Appleone Employment Service 30,513.76 Temporary Employment Services 45736 Black&Veatch Corporation 146,291.00 Professional Services P1-46-2&J-77 45737 Blue Cross of California 229,967.90 Medical Insurance Premium 45738 Brown&Caldwell 142.231.39 Professional Services Pi-37&Trunk Sewer Mapping 1-98 45739 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 32,600.26 Engineering Services P2-82 45740 Driver Allant Insurance Service, Inc. 69,090.00 Excess Workers'Compensation Insurance Premium 45741 Gmybar 28,070.40 Computer Hardware/Software&Mlsc.Electrical Supplies 46742 Haaker Equipment Company 54,984.52 Refurbishment of V-354 Vector Truck 45743 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 119,516.12 Remave/Replace?est Control Systems on(5)Cooper Engines at Pit.2 45744 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 40.093.13 Medical Insurance Premium 45746 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 88,644.78 Ferric Chloride MO9-27-95 45746 Matrix Service Corp. 131,649.60 Maintenance&Repairs to Low Pressure Gas Holder at Ph.2 45747 The Penn Air Group 40,000.00 Maintenance Service to Ventilation Supply Air at Plant 1 Lab Bldg. 45748 Nicholas Chevrolet 5U28.58 (2)2002 Chevrolet High Top Utility Trucks 45749 NRG Energy, Inc. 144,800.00 Engine No. 1 Overhaul-Pit. 1 Can Gen 45750 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 140,436.70 Engineering Services J-42 45751 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 34.277.43 Sodium Hypochlorite 45752 Primary Source 29,823.97 Office Furniture 45753 R.W.Beck 184,818.54 Professional Services 3-52,5-53,5-54&11-28 45754 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 72,207.90 Ocean Monho ing MO6-8-94 45755 SPEC Services,Inc. 68,772.89 Engineering Services J-33-1 &Pi-89 45766 Tule RanciVMagan Famw 108.133.66 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 45757 U.S.Metro Group, Inc. 26,664.83 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 45758 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 38.200.00 Temporary Employment Service 46759 Villa Ford 68,121.64 (5)2002 Ford F-150 Pickup Trucks 45760 Water Engineering, Inc. 33.165.36 Engineering Service J-67 45761 The Yakima Company 56.441.98 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-0D 45762 Connolly-Pacitic Company 87,714.00 Construction J-39 45763 Elser Constructors, Inc. 110,332.80 Construction 3-25 45764 Mike Pdich&Sons 38,973.60 Construction-Junction Structure Upgrade 45765 Driver Alliant Insurance Service,Inc. 823,000.00 All Risk&Flood Insurance Premium 45766 Elser Constructors, Inc. 276,832.00 Construction 3-25 45767 Great American Printing Co. 394.64 Printing 45768 Advanced Technology Service 1.087.78 Electrical Pads&Supplies 45769 Airborne Express 43.07 Air Freight 45770 Airgas Safety 1.318.23 Safety Supplies 45771 American Barricade, Inc. 955.75 Traffic Control Equipment 45772 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 720.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 45773 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs, Inc. 450.00 Lab Supplies?ndcily,Testing 45774 Arch Wireless 5.147.61 Pagers,Service&Alnime 45775 Associated Readymix Concrete 452.74 Concrete 45776 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 45777 Allied Refhgiration 80.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warren No. Vendor Amount Description 45778 ATOC 99.00 Lab Supplies 45779 AWSI 163.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 46780 Ballantyne,Inc. 24,186.00 Temporary Employment Services 45781 Battery Specialties 123.84 Batteries 45782 Bertech-Kelex 2,605.06 Instrument Parts&Supplies 45783 Blo-Rad Lab 254.65 Lab Supplies 45784 BloMerieux Vhek, Inc. 938.77 Lab Supplies 45785 Boyle Engineering Corporation 10,336.41 Engineering Services 7-23-1 45786 Burke engineering Co. 1,912.07 (2)Honeywell Controllers 45787 Cal Protection 1,012.00 Service Agreement-Halon Fire System at Pit. 2 Control Center 45785 California Integration Coordinators, Inc. 309.44 Repair&Calibration of Lab Flow Meters 45789 California Rebuild America Coalition 5,000.00 Membership 45790 Cad Warren&Co. 71l.35 Insurance Claims Administrator 45791 Century Business Solutions,Inc. 120.39 Stationery&Office Supplies 45792 Coast Transmission 1,542.22 Auto Repair 45793 Cole-Partner Instrument Co. 209.68 Lab Parts&Supplies 45794 Comm Vault Systems, Inc. 3,214.18 Software Maintenance Agreement 45795 Compressor Components Of California 6,330.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45796 CompuMaster On-site 3,100.00 On-Site Training-MS Project 2000 Level 1 45797 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 8,398.22 Electrical Supplies 45798 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,723.42 Plumbing Supplies 45799 Corporate Express Imaging 172.92 Computer Supplies 45800 Cost Containment Solutions 1,023.75 Workers Comp.Services 45801 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 4.578.75 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46802 County Wholesale Electric Co. 301.71 Electrical Pads&Supplies 46803 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Maint.Agreement-Con Gen Water Softner System 45804 CEPA Company 2,593.45 Lab Equipment Maint.Service 45805 Clba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 7,859.72 Cationic Polymer 45806 CSMFO 125.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 45807 CWEA Membership 70.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 45808 Daniel Company,L.L.C. 5.000.00 Tank Rehabilitation-Bacteria Reduction Program 45809 David's Tree Service 150.00 Tree Maint.Service 45810 De Guelle Glass Co.,Inc. 138.79 Safety Glass 45811 Del Mar Analytical 1,231.00 Blosolids Analysis 45812 Dexon Computer, Inc. 23,940.00 (4)Dec Vax Computer Workstations 45813 Digital Map Products,L.L.C. 1,923.00 Trunk Sewer Mapping 46814 DigiPhoto 7328 Photographic Services 45815 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 188.56 Paint Supplies 45816 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 149.53 Electrical Supplies 45817 Enchanter,Inc. 5,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24.95 45818 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 20,000.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 45819 Environmental Resource Association 1,581.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 45820 Eurotherm Controls 408.60 Electrical Pads&Supplies 45821 FedEx Corporation 497.00 Air Freight 45822 Fisher Sclerdillc Company,LL.C. 9,589.15 Lab Parts&Supplies Pace 2 of 14 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 07/16(02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45823 Flo-Systems,Inc. 2,855.38 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 45824 Franklin Covey 252.18 Office Supplies 45825 Frys Electronics 6,137.96 Computer Supplies 45826 GE Supply 3,065.73 Electrical Pads&Supplies 45a27 Gardner-Denver c/o Misco 146.16 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 45828 Garratt-Callahan Company 2,180.86 Chemicals 45829 General Petroleum 12.129.13 Unleaded Gasoline 45830 George Yardley Co. 255.83 Lab Supplies 46831 Getinge Castle 2,580.00 Lab Repairs&Maintenance Services 45832 Gold Systems, Inc. 383.75 Professional Services-Data Migration&STORET Interface Application 45833 Goldenwest Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.e990015 45834 W W Grainger, Inc. 684.96 Toots 45835 GBC(General Binding Corp) 47A7 Stationery&Office Suplies 458M Hach Company 1,274.13 Lab Supplies 45837 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 2.175.89 Plumbing Supplies 45838 Hill Brothers 12,939.43 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 45839 Home Depot 44.41 Small Hardware 45840 Hub Auto Supply 207.43 Automotive Pads&Supplies 45841 Hunton&Williams 395.00 Subscription 45842 HDR Engineering,Inc. 2,165.00 Professional Services-Analysis of Outfall Bacteria Reduction Program 45843 Imaging Express 189.15 Printer Mainenance 45844 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,908.98 Priming Service 45845 Industrial Distribution Group 1,079.91 Electrical Pans&Supplies 45646 Interstate Battery Systems 1.403.07 Batteries 45847 Ionics Instrument Business Group 248.39 Lab Pans&Supplies 45848 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 457.71 Olfsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 45849 Irvine Ranch Water District 58.22 Water Use 45850 ISCO do MRC Technology 1,518.11 Lab Supplies 45851 IDM Controls, Inc. 189.13 Repairs&Maintenance Supplies 45852 IMRI 16,885.00 Temporary Employment Services 45853 J&L Industrial Supply 405.15 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 45854 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 1,946.99 Instrument Pads&Supplies 45855 Jays Catering 351.25 Meeting Expenses 45856 Jensen instrument Co. 1,060.86 Instrument Pads&Supplies 45857 Jim's Suspension Service 30.00 Automotive Pans&Supplies 45858 JWC Environmental 9,037.00 Rebuild Grinder 45859 K.P.Lindstrom, Inc. 3,770.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 45860 Kern Thompson, Inc. 2,502.14 Construction-Potholing Various Locations 45861 Kent Automotive $48.05 Automotive Supplies 45862 Kindness General Contractors, Inc. 6,750.00 Construction-Replace Wooden Block Floor in Rebuild Shop with Concrete 45863 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 180.15 Lab Parts&Supplies 45864 Lab Support 14,710.50 Temporary Employment Services 45865 Labeltronix 572.16 Stationery&Office Supplies 45866 Law/Crandall 6,944.80 Professional Services-Soil Testing J-36,P1-37,P2-60&5-46 45867 Lee&Ro, Inc. 10,525.29 Rebuild Shop Equipment Power Installation Page 3 of 14 EXHIBIT R Claims Paid From 07)18=to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 4SB68 Lffecom-Safely,Inc. 229.50 Instrument Evaluation&Calibration Services 45869 Lindsay Engineering Services 1,512.00 Professional Services-Vibration Monitonng 45870 Unjer Company c/o Gerald Jones 4,270.32 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 45871 Long Beach Line-X 612.00 Coating of Trailer E-741 Deck 45872 Luod's 194.18 Meeting Expense 45873 Management Technologies 2,925.00 Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit 45874 Maned,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 10,000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 45875 MarVac Electronics 23.17 Electrical Pans&Supplies 45876 McGarry Central 60.93 Office Equipment Maintenance Agreement 45877 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 657.54 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45878 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 1,581.75 Mechanical Seal Rebuild 45879 Media Clips,Inc. 70.00 Notices&Ads 45880 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Rench&Yakima Sites Study 45881 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 15,516.00 Mechanical Paris,Supplies and Fabrication 45882 Minank 5,084.23 Instrument Supplies 45883 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 82.48 Janhodal Supplies 45884 Mission Uniform Service 3,985.26 Uniform Rentals 45885 Myers Power Products,Inc. 84.13 Electrical Supplies 45886 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyworks 886.85 Vehicle Painting 45887 MDS Consulting 14,076.46 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 45888 National Microcomp Services 1,212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 45889 National Plant Services,Inc. 9,787.50 Vacuum Truck Services 45890 NeWsrsant of Silicone Valley 260.00 Security System Maintenance 45891 Newark Electronics 97.80 Electrical Supplies 45892 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 230.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 45093 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 72.95 Looped Tag Engraving Services 45894 NACB(North American Crane Bureau Group) 890.00 O&M Training Registration 45895 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,136.02 Office Supplies 45896 OneSouroe Distributom, Inc. 134.14 Electrical Parts&Supplies 45897 Oxygen Service Company 2,308.17 Specialty Gases 45898 Pacific Bell 16.41 Telephone Services 45899 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,582.60 Plumbing Supplies 45900 Pacific Parts&Controls 2,503.65 Electrical Supplies 45901 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 830.95 Pump Parts&Supplies 45902 Parker Supply Company 2.784.46 Pump Parts&Supplies 45903 Partners Consulting Services 10,920.00 Help Desk Consulting Services 45904 Parts Unlimited 242.13 Automotive Parts&Supplies 45905 Patriot Video Productions 1,206.62 Video 45906 Port Supply 81.94 Safety Supplies 45907 Praxair, Inc. 10.74 Lab Supplies 459DB Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 553.16 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 45909 Proiacts Partners 13.611.04 Temporary Employment Services 45910 Pump Engineering 1,163.68 Pump Supplies 45911 PCS Express 630.65 Courier Service 45912 R.L.Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kem County Biosolids Consulting Services Papa 4 of 14 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45913 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,300.12 Trash Removal 45914 Reliastar 8,900.95 Basic Life Insurance Premium 45915 Rolls-Royce Energy System, Inc. 543.59 Electrical Pads&Supplies 45916 Ryan Hercc Products Corp. 845.25 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 45917 REF Engineers 2,923.96 Engineering Services 2-24-1 45918 RPM Electric Motors 629.73 Motor Repairs 45919 Safety-Kleen 49720 Service Agreement-Parts Cleaning&Equipment Lease 45920 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 5.240.00 Construction-Manhole Repair&Rehabilitation of Concrete Surfaces 45921 Sayboll,L.P. 600.00 Analysis of Gases at Plants 1 &2 for SCAOMD 45922 Schenck Trebel 401.90 Corrective Maintenance-Rebuild Shop Balancing Machine 45923 Schwing America, Inc. 796.06 Pump Supplies 45924 Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. 3,067.00 Lab Maintenance&Calibration of CM Profiling Sensors 45925 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1,382.32 Maintenance&Repair Materials 45926 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 925.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45927 Sigma Chemical Co. 816,34 Lab Parts&Supplies 45928 So.Cal.Gas Company 10,587.45 Natural Gas 45929 Southern California Edison 2,503.95 Power 459M Sparkletts 3.947.92 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 45931 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 548-78 Carpet Cleaning 45932 State Board of Equalization 476.46 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 45933 Slate Chemical Will.Co. 132.74 Janitorial Supplies 46934 Strata International,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 45935 Sunset Industrial Parts 95.94 Mechanical Supplies 45936 SPX Valves&Control 1,127.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45937 STL Sacramento 1.378.00 Lab Analytical Service 45938 Temdnix International Co. 275.00 Pest Control 45939 The Orange County Register 2,128.08 Notices&Ads 45940 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2.706.90 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 45941 Daily Pilot 287.50 Notices&Ads 45942 Top Hat Productions 721.01 Catering Services 45943 Tomell&Cohen 8.137.10 Legal Services-J.Howard vs.OCSD 45944 Train Consulting Engineers 10.958.00 Engineering Services 1-2-4 45945 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 16,139.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11.94 45946 Truck&Auto Supply,Ix. 297S1 Automotive Supplies 45947 Tustin Awards 123.92 Plaque&Shelf 45948 Teksystems 6.484.00 Temporary Employment Services 45949 US Filter Corporation 1,282.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 45950 U.S Postal ServlCe(AMS-TMS) 5,000.00 Postage 45951 Ultra Scientific 7822 Lab Supplies 45952 UCI Regents 24.633.35 Professional Services J-85 45953 Varian Associates,Inc. 510.74 Lab Pads&Supplies 45954 Vertzon California 327.90 Telephone Services 45955 Veme's Plumbing 925.00 Service Contract.Testing&Cert. BacHow Devices at Pits. 1 &2&Pump SIB. 46956 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,42428 Vision Service Premium 45957 V0lcan Performance Chemicals 23.428.89 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 Page 5 0114 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 45958 V L Systems,Inc. 765.00 Professional Services-Exchange Upgrade&Support 45959 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 5.197.92 Lab Parts&Supplies 45960 The Wackenhut Corporation 9,028.71 Security Guards 45961 Waste Markets Corp. 18,752.16 Maim.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mat'I.Removal 45962 Wame Sanitary Supply 258.96 Janitorial Supplies 45963 Weber Scientific 376.31 Lab Supplies 45964 Western Wholesale 232.92 Power Blower 45965 W astmark Paint Co. 73.90 Painting Supplies 45966 Westport ApareWs DBA Breaker Supply 220.17 Electrical Paris&Supplies 45967 Arthur Wollson Ph.D 22,977.09 Prof.Services-NPDES Permit Renewal 45968 Xerox Corporation 9,898.26 Fax&Copier Leases&Maintenance 45969 Punchlist Contractors 5.490.00 Construction-Purchasing Cord.Room,PIL 1 45970 Robert M.Bell 984.87 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 45971 Charles G.Lee 521.37 MeetinglTrainirg Expense Reimbursement 45972 Employee Activity Committee 16.00 Service Award Expense 45973 Deirdre E.Hunter 2.190.63 Employee Computer Loan Program 45974 Law Offices of Kinkle,Rodiger&Spriggs 195.30 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 45975 Orange County Sanitation District 1,250.11 Petty Cash Reimb. 45976 Postmaster 45.00 Post Office Box Rental 45977 Karen A.Turnbaugh 1,059.60 Employee Computer Loan Program 45978 County of Orange 893.00 Notice of Determination Filing Fee Re Level of Treatment 45979 City of Fountain Valley 29,126.40 Water Use 45980 Orange County Sanitation District 537.459.88 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 45981 Southern California Edson 133,270.81 Power 45982 Airgas Safety 7,168.78 Safety Supplies 45983 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 291.89 Telephone Service 45994 Court Order 732AS Wage Garnishment 45985 Voided Check - - 45986 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 7222 Elecdcal Supplies 45987 CALPELRA 1,290.00 Human Resources Training Registration 45988 CASA 1,500.00 Administration Meeting Registration 45989 Driver Alliant Insurance Service, Inc. 5D0.00 Special Risk-Accident Health Insurance 45990 E.Excel Meat, Inc. 670.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 45991 Electra-Bond,Inc. 24,421.54 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Fusion Bond Hi Rate Mix Pump 45992 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 16,178.98 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-July 45993 Court Order 525.00 Wage Gamishment 45994 EEOC 530.00 Human Resources Training Registration 45995 City of Huntington Beach 400.88 Water Use 45996 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,177.75 Dues Deduction 45997 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 99.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 45998 Mobile Air Condticning Society 200.00 Membership 45999 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Garnishment 46000 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 1,033.34 Hoses&Fittings 46001 Organized Executive 97.00 Subsciption 46002 OCEA 432.11 Dues Deduction Pace 6 of 14 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46003 Pacific Bell 1,190.46 Telephone Services 46004 Padgett-Thompson 990.00 Engineering Training Registration 4000.5 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 46006 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 46007 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,044.00 Dues Deduction 46008 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 99.61 Water Use 46009 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 738.07 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46010 Court Order 721.60 Wage Garnishment 46011 Summit Steel 906.55 Metal 46012 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 51.65 Mechanical Supplies 46013 Tusan Dodge 572.37 Truck Parts 46014 Union Bank of California 3.895.86 Banking Services 46015 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 46016 UC Regents-UC Press 408.97 Publication 46017 Verizon California 3.648.02 Telephone Services 46018 WEF 112.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 46019 Zee Medical 2,873.13 Safety Supplies 46020 Thomas M.Stands 415.11 Meeting/TraWng Expense Reimbursement 46021 Norman Eckenrode 76.45 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46022 John G.Gonzalez 290.83 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 46023 James C.Mullins 284.56 Meating/Training Expense Reimbursement 46024 Robert J.Taylor 2,407.15 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46025 Gary L.Wellman 480.75 Meatingt7raining Expense Reimbursement 46026 J.V.Berdin 80.00 User Fee Refund He Septic Tanks 46027 Bishop,Lester Tyler 80.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46028 Eduardo Anaya 1,203.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46029 Elsenpeter,Jeffrey R. 1,203.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46030 Farrell, Douglas 1.203.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46031 Fmneauz,Memo 1,203.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46032 Fuller,Robert E. 1,209.58 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46033 Ghirelll,Robert 3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 46034 Hamm,William Lloyd 1,062.92 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46035 Hill,Douglas 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46036 Jensen,Edmrd C. 78355 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46037 Johnson,Larry 783.65 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46038 Kipp,Thomas E.Jr. 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46039 Kirven,Nancy A. 1,203.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46040 Konopisos,James L. 1.040.67 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46041 Martin,Paul 1.246.60 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46042 Peter McGrath 114.10 Vehicle Damage Claim 46043 O'Hare,Mildred E. 1,203.03 User Fee Refund He Septic Tanks 46044 Olsen,Kenneth 1,203.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46045 Pantola,Enrique 2.739.53 Employee Computer Loan Program 46046 Pavloff,John 1,203.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46047 Unruh,Gerald R. 2,110.64 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks Page 7 of 14 EXHIBITS Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrlption 46048 Air Products&Chemicals 25,758.02 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 46049 Black&Veatch Corporation 278,419.94 Engineering Services J-77 46050 Brown&Caldwell 38,813.96 Professional Services-Waste Discharge Requirements CMOM Program Support 46051 BP Energy Company 120,415.92 Natural Gas 46052 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 414,651.49 Engineering Services J-40-8 46053 Cooper Energy Systems 27,122.95 Repair&Maintenance Services-Turbocharger 46054 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 62,877.70 Chemicals 46055 Delta Dental 48,400.18 Dental Insurance Plan 46056 Driver Alllant Insurance Service, Inc. 101,118.00 Boiler&Machinery Insurance Premium 46057 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 141,436.39 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 46058 NetVersant of Southern California 46,863.49 Human Resources Security System Improvements 46059 Nomal Beverage 139,417.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46060 Orange County Water District 113,693.04 GWRS Joint Project J-36 46061 Pacific Investment Management Co. 153,734.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 46062 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 33,487.49 Caustic Soda 46063 Projects Partners 47,269.57 Temporary Employment Services 46064 Sancen Engineering,Inc. 28,115.00 Construction-Airvent Manhole Dewatering&Mineral Deposit Cleaning 46065 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 137,029.47 Ocean Monitoring MO B-8-94 46066 Southern Calif Coastal Water Research 29.000.00 Professional Services-Secondary Treatment Analyses 46067 Southern California Edison 96.541.41 Power 46068 Synagro Technologies, Inc. 255,873.50 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 46069 Systime Computer Corp 25,000.00 Software Agreement-J O Edwards One World XE Implementation 46070 Tetra Tech, Inc. 53,146.81 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 46071 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 150,775.29 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-96 46072 U.S.Metro Group, Inc. 26,664.83 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 46073 U.S.Peroxide 27,450.00 Prof.Services-Collection Sys.Odor&Corrosion Chemical Add.Dena.Study 46074 University of Southern California 25,000.00 Professional Services-Plume Modeling SP-85 46075 Via Ford 45,414.43 (5)2002 F-150 Pickup Trucks 46076 Woodruff,Spradim&Smart 1a2,485.65 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 46077 XESystems,Inc. 25,016.00 (1)Large Printer/Scanner/Copier 46078 Airborne Express 99.35 Air Freight 46079 Airgas Safety 18.83 Safety Supplies 46080 Alta-Robbins,Inc. 179.58 Instrument Supplies 46081 American Airlines 2,617.50 Travel Services 46082 Appleone Employment Service 3,a27.40 Temporary Employment Services 46083 Applied Ocean Sciences 21,906.00 Professional Services J-85 46084 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 24,850.00 Mlcrofiltration Effluent Evaluation 46085 Arizona Instrument 165.32 Instrument Parts,Repairs&Calibration 46086 AT&T Universal Biller 7,484.87 Telephone Service 46087 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 96.37 Telephone Service 46088 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,468.17 Cellular Telephone Service 46069 AWSI 222.52 Department of Transportation Training Program 46090 Ballantyne,Inc. 6,960.00 Temporary Employment Services 46091 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 2,759.63 Telephone Equipment 46092 Basic Chemical Solutions 497.47 Bleach Page 8 of 14 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 07/16M to 07131/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46093 Battery Specialties 145.85 Batteries 46094 BioVir Laboratories 237.00 Lab Analyses 46095 Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 1.009.00 Publication 46096 Burton Jones 111.04 Professional Services J-85 46097 Bush&Associates,Inc. 3,400.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 46098 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 257.44 Sign 46099 Cal Slate University 111.55 Publication 46100 California Auto Collision 3,120.73 Repairs to Vehicles 495&464 46101 Cameron Welding Supply 1,054.75 Welding Supplies 48102 Cad Warren&Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 46103 Camillo Engineers 15.650.39 Professional Services J-87 46104 Center for Creative Growth 1,65025 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 46105 Certified Truck Bodies 1.616.25 Vehicle Repairs-V-397 46106 Communications Supply Corp. 13,874.92 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46107 Compressor Components Of California 4,241.04 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 46108 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 4.863.95 Electrical Supplies 46109 Cooper Energy Services 626.48 Engine Supplies 46110 Corporate Express 3,040.45 Office Supplies 46111 County of Orange 100.00 Permit Fee 48112 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 6,611.81 Sewer Spill Clean-up I I/15101 &Maint.of Base/Handheld&Vehicle Radios 46113 County Sanitation Dists of Los Angeles 650.00 Olfactometry Lab Analyses 46114 County Wholesale Electric Co. 510.88 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46115 Crane America Services, Inc. 352.50 Crane Services 46116 Crystal Decisions Inc. 11,680.30 Software Maintenance Agreement 46117 Cynthia Cudaback 494.38 Professional Services J-85 46118 CEM Corporation 520.69 Lab Supplies 46119 CPI-The Alternative Supplier,Inc. 1.125.29 Lab Parts&Supplies 46120 CWEA Membership 280.00 Membeshlp-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 46121 CWEA-TCP 70.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 46122 David's Tree Service 745.00 Tree Maint.Service 46123 Del Mar Analytical 10,421.00 Biosolids Analysis 46124 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 14,814.49 Sniffer Software&New Server Tapes&Labels 46125 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 240.55 Paint Supplies 46126 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 967.61 Electrical Supplies 46127 Ecology Tire, Inc. 441.00 Waste Management-Tires 46128 Employers Group 3,300.00 On-Site Training-'Tim Management'and"Get Organized'6/18/02 46129 Enchanter, Inc. 5,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 46130 Environmental Resource Association 225.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 46131 Environmental Science Associates 10,639.47 Professional Services J-40.5 46132 Equipco Sales&Service 534.95 trial.Repairs,Maint.&Parts 46133 Eurotherm Controls 1,017.32 Inst.Parts&Supplies 46134 Eurotherm Controls 1,192.13 ImL Parts&Supplies 46135 Ernecim 67.99 Sgnage Materials 46136 ENS Resources, Inc. 4.031.50 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 46137 Christian Fant'Icola 474.94 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks Page 9 of 14 FXHIRIT R Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46138 FedEx Corporation 229.17 Air Freight 46139 Fitsrsky&Watt,L.L.P. 4,607.50 Professional Services-SPMT Negotiations&Special Services 46140 Filter Supply Company 2,660.48 Filters 46141 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,712.74 Lab Parts&Supplies 46142 Flat and Vertical,Ina 2,692.00 Concrete Cutting 46143 Fleet Services 300.66 Truck Repair 46144 Flo-System, Inc. 508.47 Pump Supplies 46145 Foodcralt Coffee&Refreshment Services 357.39 Meeting Supplies 46146 Fonts Benefits Insurance Company 20,498.44 Long&Short-Tenn Disability Ins.Premium 46147 Foss Environmental 3,253.00 Caustic Tank Cleaning,Removal&Disposal 46148 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 793.26 Truck Wash Tickets 46149 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 351.80 Paint Supplies 46150 Franklin Covey 102.49 Office Supplies 46151 Frys Electronics 696.29 Computer Supplies 46152 Full Spectrum Analytics 1,693.53 Instrument Repairs 46153 City of Fullerton 367.65 Water Use 46154 Ganahl Lumber Company 246.65 Lumber/Hardware 46155 Gardner-Denver do Misco 158.59 Fibers 46156 Ganratt-Callahan Company 2,204.57 Chemicals 48157 Gemini Associates, Inc. 7,327.00 Fiber Optic Cable 46158 General Petroleum 5,605.02 Unleaded Gasoline 46159 George T.Hall 6.477.93 Electrical Supplies 46160 George Yardley Co. 1,112.42 Valves 46161 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 2,478.26 Belt Filter Press Supplies 46162 W W Grainger,Inc. 8,641.48 Maintenance Equipment,Tools&Supplies 46163 Grbybar 13.831.59 Computer Hardware/Software&Misc.Electrical Supplies 46164 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 32.20 Janitorial Supplies 46165 Haaker Equipment Company 10,607.18 Truck Parts,Supplies&Service 46166 Hach do Penton Industries 4,898.36 Lab Pans&Supplies 46107 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 46168 Hasco Oil Co.,Inc. 78.34 Lube Oil 46169 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 5,116.31 Engine Generator Control Supplies 46170 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 34.50 Meeting Expenses 46171 Hil%Inc. 1,471.16 Tools 46172 The Holman Group 714.26 Employee Assistance Program Premium 46173 Hub Auto Supply 284.41 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 46174 Deirdre E.Hunter 1.057.93 Lab Meeting Registration 46175 City of Huntington Beach 2,535.69 Water Use 46176 HI Standard Automotive 2,630.46 Automotive Supplies&Installation 46177 Imaging Express 315.68 Printer Maintenance 46178 Imaging Plus, Inc. 1,031.00 Printing Service 46179 Industrial Distribution Group 684.53 Mechanical&Painting Supplies&Lubricants 46180 IBM 2,614.50 Software Maintenance Agreement-AS-400 46181 Interstate Battery Systems 157.21 Batteries 46182 Invensys Systems, Inc. 7,638.29 Instrument Pans&Supplies Page 10 of 14 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46183 Ionics Instrument Business Group 12320 Lab Supplies 46184 IMRI 4,750.00 Prof.Services-Web Site Design&Development 46185 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 8,904.61 Construction 7-14-4& 11-23 46186 Jays Catering 723.80 Meeting Expenses 46187 Joe Rhodes Maintenance Services, Inc. 129.00 Maint.Agreement-OCSD Fuel Management System 46188 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 3.633.32 Professional Services-Compensation&Classification Study 46189 FormsTronicsRichards Capital Corporation 111.25 Payroll Check Stock 46190 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 3,71327 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 46191 Kars Advance Materials, Inc. 8,635.00 Can Gen Engine No. 1 Testing 46192 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 63.01 Safety Supplies 46193 Lab Support 1.888.25 Temporary Employment Services 46194 Linjer Company clo Gerald Jones 4.314.89 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 46195 Lucci's 168.96 Meeting Expense 46196 Lustre-Cal 1,193.25 Capital Asset Tags 46197 LECCOTECH 2,875.00 Soffware Maintenance 46198 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 11,677.46 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 46199 Manatt,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 10.000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 46200 Manleys Boiler Repair Company,Inc. 804.00 Boiler Repair 46201 MarVac Electronics 46.46 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46202 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 5,743.09 Executive Disability Plan Premium 46203 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 217.06 Flags&Screen Cloth 46204 Measurement Variables,Inc. 78.84 Electrical Supplies 46205 Mac Analytical System 5,459.62 Professional Services J-85 46206 Media Clips,Inc. 70.00 Notices&Ads 46207 Medlin Controls Co. 313.69 Instrument Supplies 46208 Meeting Planners Plus 5,500.00 Professional Services-Orange County Fair 46209 Mellon Trust 19,951.50 Investment Custodian Bank 46210 Metro Concrete Pumping, Inc. 150.00 Concrete Pumping Service 46211 Minarik 3.225.06 Instrument Supplies 46212 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 160.11 Janitorial Supplies 46213 Mission Uniform Service 3,938.53 Uniform Rentals 46214 Moreland&Associates 8,254-14 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 46215 MSA-C/O Geoff Cobbett 85.00 Membership 46216 Neel Supply Co. 1.257.44 Plumbing Supplies 46217 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 1,020.00 Human Resources Training Registration 46218 Nextel Communications 4,007.00 Cellular Phones&Air Time 46219 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 5,933.56 Diesel Fuel 46220 The Norco Companies 160.00 Mail Delivery Service 46221 North American Crane Bureau, Inc. 6,000.00 O&M Training Registration 46222 NCG Porter Novelli, Inc. 11,137.60 Prof.Services-Public Relations 46223 Ocean Test Equipment,Inc. 95.75 Lab Parts&Supplies 46224 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.494.19 Office Supplies 46225 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 371.48 Janitorial Supplies 46226 Oracle Corporation-SupporVSeles 2,914.44 Computer Soflware/Haroware&Support 46227 Orange County Hose Company 270.18 Hose Supplies&Pads Page 11 of 14 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46228 Orange Courier 66.00 Courier Services 46229 Ortiz Fire Protection 1,323.00 Test Valve Repairs&Maintenance 46230 Oxygen Service Company 1,541.23 Specialty Gases 46231 GOB Reprographics 15,038.22 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 46232 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 8.61 Electrical Supplies 46233 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 46234 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,432.81 Pump 46235 Pacific Parts&Controls 5,351.45 Electrical Supplies 46236 Pacific States Chemical, Inc. 1,278.05 Chemloals 46237 Parker Supply Company 451.00 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 46238 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 6,402.32 Lab Instrument Parts,Repairs&Service 46239 Hach Go Porten Industries 4,864.36 Instrument Pane&Supplies 46240 Power Bros.Machine, Inc. 1,695.00 Mechanical Repairs 46241 Progressive Business Publications 230.00 Subscription 46242 PCS Express 220.00 Courier Service 46243 R.W. Beck 6,949.98 Professional Services P1-90 46244 R.L.Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kem County Blosolids Consulting Services 46245 Randolph Austin Co. 659.26 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46246 Raney Industries 3.840.00 Belt Filter Press Modifications 46247 Regents of Univ.of California 10.299.18 Professional Services J-85 46248 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 5.624.03 Pump&Pump Supplies 46249 Roto Rooter 1,922.50 Sewerllne Cleaning 46250 Royce Multimedia, Inc. 5,463.19 Video Production Services 46251 Rutan&Tucker,L.L.P. 14,560.00 Legal Services-Terminetlon Appeal 46252 Ryan How Products Corp. 1,246.62 Plumbing Supplies 46253 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 10,000.00 Engineering Services-Corrosion Repair Work at Miller-Holder Trunkllns 46254 RPM Electric Motors 1,018.31 Motor Repairs&Service 46255 Saybolt,L.P. 600.00 Analysis of Gases at Plants 1 &2 for SCAW MD 46256 Scott Specially Gases,Inc. 826.08 Lab Pans&Supplies 46257 Seavisual Consulting, Inc. 5,535.00 Professional Servlcee-Ocean Ouffall Instrumentation 46258 Sensotec,Inc. 585.15 Electrical Supplies 46259 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 944.97 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46260 Smardan Supply Company-Valley Cities 205.87 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 46261 SoltVlew Computer Products 688.49 Office Supplies 46262 Spex Cerliprep, Inc. 115.05 Lab Supplies 46263 Standard and Poors Corp. 5,000.00 Series 2000 COP Annual Surveillance Fee 46264 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 564.17 Janitorial Supplies 46265 Straughan Technical Distribution,L.L.C. 836.13 Mechanical Supplies 46266 Summit Steel 1,183.30 Metal 46267 Sunset Industrial Paris 326.44 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46268 Super Power Products 387.90 Janitorial Supplies 46269 Surveyor Servlcee 193.12 Stationery&Office Supplies 46270 SPX Valves&Control 12,929.37 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46271 Teletrac, Inc. 4,670.97 Vehicle Tracking System 46272 Terminix International Co. 276.00 Pest Control Pape 12 of 14 EXHIBIT 8 Collins Paid From 07/16M to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor AnnouM Description 46273 Texas Analytical Controls,Inc. 1.481.80 Instrument Repairs 46274 The Orange County Register 1,497.92 Notices&Ads 46275 Thermo Finnigan, L.L.C. 21,137.50 Lab Service Agreement 46276 Thermo Lab.Systems,Inc. 8,050.00 Software Maintenance Agreement 46277 Osprey Marine Management 1,920.00 Lab Analyses 46278 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 581.50 Mechanical Supplies 46279 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1.544.00 Elevator Maintenance 46280 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 46281 Top Hat Productions 161.63 Meeting Expenses 46282 The Trans Company 3,187.00 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 46283 Trendiest 193.52 Pump Repairs 46284 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 32&00 O&M Training Registration 46285 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 9,878.19 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 46286 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 619.97 Truck&Auto Supplies 46287 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 275.00 Lab Services 46288 Taksystem 2,507.00 Temporary Employment Services 46289 The Unisoume Corporation 8429 Stationery&Office Supplies 46290 United Parcel Service 1,23725 Parcel Services 46291 University of Arizona 10,000.00 Grant Support-Pathogen Emission Rate 46292 US Fi ter/Envirex 8.024.68 (2)Chain and Flight Sludge Collectors&Installation 46293 US Postal Service 249.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46294 Vallen Safety Supply Company 63720 Safety Supplies 46295 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 1,420.27 Engine Repair 46M The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 11.601).00 Temporary Employment Service 46297 Verizon California 60.78 Telephone Services 46298 V L Systems, Inc. 2,480.00 Exchange Upgrade&Support 46299 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 5,977.89 Lab Parts&Supplies 46300 The Wackenhut Corporation 9,558.08 Security Guards 46301 Waste Markets Corp. 21,165.76 Maim.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal& Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal 46302 Waters Corporation 4,80721 Lab Parts&Supplies 46303 Wave Sanitary Supply 180.16 Janitorial Supplies 46304 Weather&Wind Instrument Co. 513.10 Wind Socks 46305 Wesco Distribition Inc. 543.48 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46306 West Coast Valve Services 620.64 Valves 46307 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 648.50 Electrical Pads&Supplies 46308 Wilhelm Electric Co., Inc. 10.835.00 Construction-Potholing(14)Locations J-77 46309 WorldatWork 160.00 Membership 46310 WOI 450.00 O&M Training Registration-Water Quality Inc. 46311 Xerox Corporation 5.959.92 Fax&Copier Leases 46312 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 220.35 Office Supplies 46313 The Yakima Company 21,292.38 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 46314 Yokogaws Corp.of America 101.03 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46315 3E Company 7,956.00 MSDS On-Line Services 46316 Wanda R.Hagerty 138.01 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46317 James E.Hauler 493.30 Meeling?raining Expense Reimbursement Page 13 of 14 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 07/16/02 to 07/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46318 Bejac Construction 1,023.05 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46319 Bell, Frank E. 1,403.09 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46320 Bushore,Gerald R. 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46321 City of Tustin 5,000.00 Encroachment Pena 7.41 46322 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 670.00 Sawer Service Fee Administration 46323 Dowling,Madge 1,246.60 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46324 Doyle,Richard 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46325 Dunbar,Rosabelle Dramer 1,197.88 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46326 Gamble,Margaret 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46327 Gavemm nt Finance Officers Association 450.00 Application Fee for GFOA Budget Award 46328 Manion, Philip 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46329 Krzywicki, Edwin or Heather 85.77 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46330 Lark,B. 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46331 Orange County Sanitation District 1,178.87 Petty Cash Relmb. 45332 Omelas,Alvaro 161.67 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46333 Secretary of State 20.00 Bi-Annual Non-Profit Financing Corporation Statement 46334 Stegner,Charles 890.47 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46335 Valencia,E.or Maschlon,M. 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46336 Walker,Carolyn 161.57 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46337 Waite, Phyllis Billie 2.752.38 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46338 Winder,Leariod E. 1,114.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 46339 Margate Construction, Inc. 1,113,994.00 Construction P7-37,J-71-7, P2-85-1 46340 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 9,837,959.91 Pavroll Disbursements 27211 -27227 Interim Paychecks $ 6,688.28 Investment Incentive Salary Plan 27228-27331 Employee Paychecks 158,710.13 Biweekly Payroll 07/24/02 27332-27332 Interim Paycheck 1,710.30 Reissue Stale Dated Chock 75040-75500 Direct Deposit Statements 809,827.16 Biweekly Payroll 07/24/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 976,935.87 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trost Co.of CA,N.A. $ 8,603,956.30 July Int.&Princ.Pymt.on 1990-92 Advance Refund.Certificates of Participation State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA,N.A. 4,964,308.69 July Int.&Princ.Pymt.on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 13,568,264.99 Total Claims Paid 07/16/02-07/31/02 $24,383,160.77 Page 14 of 14 EXHIBIT B I� BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meegng Date Tand.tf Dir. og/zs/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant - SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 08/01/02—08/15/02 and 08/16/02—08/31/02 D' Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 46341 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. & 60.13 Demurrage Charge 46342 Center for a New Orange County 30,000.00 Sponsorship 46343 City of Buena Park 91,968.50 Cooperative Project J-73 46344 City of Huntington Beach 1.083.602.74 Cooperative Project J-73 46345 Driver Alliant Insurance Service,Inc. 91,696.00 Boller&Machinery Insurance Premium 46346 Driver Alliant Insurance Service,Inc. 62,208.12 Excess Liability Insurance Premium 46347 Margate Construction,Inc. 171,610.00 Construction P2-39 46348 Orange County Sanitation District 531,681.89 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 46349 California Bank&Trust 57,895.00 Construction J-33-IA,Retention 46350 Connolly-Pacific Company 100,118.00 Construction J-39 46351 J W Contracting Corporation $21,451.00 Construction P2-60 46352 Southern Contracting Company 521,058.00 Construction J-33-11A,Retention 46353 Union Bank of California 36,717.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 46354 Urbante ,Engineering, Inc. 47.250.00 Construction J-66 46355 Alrgas Safety 930.12 Safety Supplies 46356 Awards&Trophies Company 72.57 Plaques 46357 A T&T Wireless Services-Airtime 63.23 Cellular Telephone Service 46358 A T&T Wireless Services 6,661.64 Wireless Phone Services 46359 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 46360 Bondlogistix,L.L.C. 2.500.00 Prof.Services-Preparation of Interim Arbitrage Rebate Report Series 1992 46361 Carolb Engineers 3,678.94 Engineering Services-Installation of High Rate Mix Pump on Digester R 46362 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 46363 CompuMaster On-site 6.900.00 Human Resources Training Registration 46364 County of Orange 6,679.20 Engineering Services-Trunk Sewer Mapping 1-98 46365 CASA 300.00 Lab Meeting Registration 46366 CEM Corporation 19,522.68 Lab Parts&Supplies 46367 CR&R,Inc. 315.00 Container Rentals 46368 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 8,336.31 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 46369 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 46370 Environmental Data Solutions Grps., L.L.C. 16,398.75 Professional Services-Air Information Management System(AIMS) 46371 City of Fountain Valley 700.00 Joint Project J-90 46372 HIII Brothers 15,056.72 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunklins 46373 Hunton&Williams 495.00 Lab Meeting Registration 46374 Industrial Metal Supply 1.641.34 Metal 46375 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 31.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46376 Innedine Engineering 620.00 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 46377 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3.177.75 Dues Deduction 46378 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 3.318.70 Traffic Signs&Misc. Hardware 46379 Law Journal Press 82.63 Publication 46380 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 797.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46381 National Plant Services, Inc. 4,152.50 Vacuum Truck Services 46382 Orange County Marshal 46.00 Wage Garnishment 46383 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 1.216.42 Fittings Pepe 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From OB/0'I/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46384 Oxygen Service Company 1,449.64 Lab Paris&Supplies 46385 OCB Reprographics 136.73 Printing Servico-MO 1/26100 46386 OCEA 469.11 Dues Deduction 46387 PacNlo Bell 40.07 Telephone Services 46388 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 46389 Court Order 296.00 Wage Gamfshment 46390 Peeve Officers Council of CA 1,053.00 Dues Deduction 46391 Scott Specalty Gases,Inc. 1.918.99 Specialty Gases 46392 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 513.37 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46393 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 46394 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 486.00 2002-03 Annual Emission, Operation 8 Misc. Fees 46395 Southern California Edison 9,063.60 Power 46396 Summit Steel 141.57 Metal 46397 Textile Engineering Associates 5,250.52 Belt Press Supplies 4639E Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 6,089.65 Mechanical Pads 8 Supplies 46399 Transcat 3,737.73 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 464DO Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 420.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 46401 U.S Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 46402 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 46403 UC Regents 1,250.00 Membership 46404 Vedzon California 765.60 Telephone Services 46405 YCA 995.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration 46406 Nicholas J.Arhontes 253.46 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 46407 Mom A.Brown 573.45 Meefing/Training Expense Reimbursement 46408 Barbara A.Collins 221.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46409 Steven R.DeWllde 575.02 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46410 Martin A.Dix 780A4 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46411 Kathy L.Waldron 140.06 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimbursement 46412 Employee Activity Committee 27.00 Service Award Expense 46413 Environmental Lab Accred8a6on Program 3,119.00 Lab Certification 46414 Project Management Institute 30.00 O&M Training Registration 46415 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 96,152.00 Professional Services J-73-2 46416 AKM Consulting Engineers 43,168.43 Professional Services 7-41 46417 EIMCO/Baker Process 25,601.40 Rebuild CIMCO C54 Drive 46418 Black&Veatch Corporation 487,336.20 Engineering Services J-77 B Pi-76 46419 Blue Cross of California 274,709.52 Medical Insurance Premium 46420 Brown B Caldwell 81,286.51 Engineering Services J-25-681-98 46421 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 122,476.68 Engineering Services J-40.8 46422 Corollo Engineers 179,474.08 Professional Services Pt-60,P2-60,J-39 B J-254 46423 Center For Urban Infrastructure Comm. Dsgn. 25,000.00 Sponsorship 46424 Delta Dental 48,556.22 Dental Insurance Plan 46425 Driver Alliant Insurance Service,Inc. 127,648A2 California Municipal Excess Uabllity(CAMEL) Insurance Premium 46426 Keiser Foundation Health Plan 40,292.34 Medical Insurance Premium 46427 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 112,087.10 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27.95 Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT A - Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46428 Lee&Ro,Inc. 157,39024 Professional Services P247-3,J-71-7,5.49.551 &552 46429 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 119,47728 Engineering Services J42 46430 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 40,589.06 Prof.Svrs.-Meter Mooring,Plume Modelling,Pi-85&Ocean Monitoring 46431 Tute Rench(Magan Fanns - 100,119.55 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 46432 U.S. Peroxide 51,187.16 Hydrogen Peroxide 46433 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 82,475.67 Engineering Service J-67 46434 The Yakima Company 67,008.77 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 46435 Ken Thompson, Inc. 385.408.00 Construction 546 46436 Urbantac Engineering, Inc. 56,700.00 Construction J-66 46437 Internal Revenue Service 696.200.00 Arbitrage Rebate Installment Re 1992 Series Certificates of Participation 46438 Orange County Sanitation District 26,20.81 Workers Comp.Reimb. 46439 A-Plus Systems 4,292.40 Notices&Ads 46440 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 1,897.50 Professional Services-CSG Fuel Mixing For Emission Control 46441 Airgas-West 49.40 Lab Parts&Supplies 46442 Airgas Safety 8,727.60 Safety Supplies 46443 Alta-Robbins,Inc. 453.96 Instrument Supplies 46444 American Express 24,886.28 Purchasing Card Program, Misc.Supplies&Services 46445 American Lifts 419.14 (1)Pallet Truck 46446 Appleone Employment Service 20.218.19 Temporary Employment Services 46447 Archer Western Contractors,Ltd. 15.380.76 Construction-Interplant Microwave Data Transmission 46448 Arizona Instrument 1,259.50 Instrument Parts&Repairs 46449 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 46450 AC Behringer,Inc. 440.15 Pump Supplies 46451 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 62.03 Telephone Service 48452 Battery Specialties 124.13 Batteries 46453 Beckman Coulter, Inc. 1.419.00 Instrument Maint.Service 46454 Bell Land Surveying 3,910.00 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 46455 Berendsen Fluid Power 627.83 Vatves 46456 BioMerieux Vdek,Inc. 1,377.14 Lab Supplies 46457 Bongarde Communications,Ltd. 94.25 Publication 46458 Bush&Associates, Inc. 2,466.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 46459 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 378.09 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Service 46460 C.S.U.F. Foundation 9,787.50 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 46461 California Auto Collision 649.28 Vehicle Repairs 46462 California Automatic Gate 1,035.74 Maint.Agreement-Automatic Gates at Pits. 1 &2 46463 Cathcart Garda von Langan Engineers 15.027.50 Professional Services-Activated Sludge Plant Anaerobic Selector Study 46464 Certified Truck Bodies 14.888.23 Auto Crane&Installation 46465 Charts, Inc. 197.28 Charts 46466 Communications Supply Corp. 14.377.28 Fiber Optic Cable&Electrical Parts&Supplies 46467 Compressor Components of California 3,315.00 Mechanical Pads,Supplies&Repairs 46468 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2,772.50 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46469 Control Factors-Seattle, Inc. 994.80 Filter Elements 46470 Cooper Energy Services 425.34 Engine Supplies 46471 Cooper Energy Systems 832.13 Engine Supplies Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/Q1/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46472 Coordinated Wire Rope&Rigging 411.09 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46473 Corporate Business Interiors 3,012.44 Kitchen Booth&Table& Installation 46474 Corporate Express Imaging 196.08 Computer Supplies 46475 Corporate Express 333.98 Office Supplies 46476 Cortech Engineering 3,833.99 Pump Supplies 46477 Cost Containment Solutions 1.199.22 Worker's Comp.Services 46478 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 3,369.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46479 County Wholesale Electric Co. 546.15 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46480 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Maint.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softner System 46481 CGvL Engineers 1.344.75 Professional Services P1-94 46482 Clba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 23,581.72 Cationic Polymer 46483 CR&R,Inc. 1,589.28 Container Rentals 46484 CWEA Membership 184.00 Membership-Calf.Water Environment Assoc. 46485 Del Mar Analytical 3,966.50 Biosolids Analysis 46486 Department of Transportation 630.00 CALTRANS Paving Project Area-Raising OCSD Manholes 46487 Diamond H Recognition 1,380.65 Employee Service Awards 46488 DHL Worldwide Express 70.86 Shipping Fees 46489 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 742.94 Electrical Supplies 46490 Eberhard Equipment 200.74 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 46491 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 3.020.50 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-June&July 46492 Enchanter,Inc. 6,300.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 46493 Environmental Resource Association 2.129.45 Lab Parts&Supplies 46494 Excel Door&Gate Company,Inc. 4,669.00 Roll-Up Door at Pit.2 Dewatering 46495 ENRG 65.43 Maintenance Services-Compressed Natural Gas Station 46496 FedEx Corporation 68.64 Air Freight 46497 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 5,167.39 Lab Parts&Supplies 46498 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 315.00 Concrete Cutting 46499 Foodcra8 Coffee&Refreshment Services 40.16 Meeting Supplies 46500 Fountain Valley Camera 15.89 Photo Supplies 46501 Franklin Covey 626.53 Office Supplies 46502 Frontline Management,Inc. 1.155.65 (1)Pressure Controller 46503 Full Spectrum Analy6ca 4,715.60 Lab Equipment Repairs&Service 46504 G.T. Hell Company 541.67 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46505 Galbraith Laboratories, Inc. 1,080.00 Lab Analyses 46506 Ganahl Lumber Company 151.51 Lumber/Hardware 46507 Garratt-Callahan Company 2,432.13 Chemicals 46508 General Petroleum 3.219.83 Lubricants&Oil 46509 George Yardley Co. 157.32 Lab Supplies 46510 Glodlch-Mitchell,Inc. 11,690.88 Bak Filter Press Supplies 46511 W W Grainger, Inc. 5,405.55 Inst. Parts&Supplies 46512 Grayber 8,066.21 Cabinets for CRISP Hardware System-Bacteria Reduction Program 46513 Edwards Systems Technology 680.00 Service Agreement-Fire Alarm System 46514 Haaker Equipment Company 502.72 Service Agreement-Misc.Repairs&Parts 46515 Hach clo Ponton Industries 10,672.99 Lab Parts&Supplies a Page 4 Of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46516 Amedmn Sigma,Inc. 1,906.63 Lab Supplies 46517 Halcyon Press 80.00 Publication 46518 Haninglon Industrial Plastics,Inc. 499.93 Instrument Supplies 46519 Ascem Hasler Mailing Systems 221.00 Meter Rental-Complete Intellitouch System Mail Center Manager 46520 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 4,724.45 Engine Generator Control Supplies 46521 Health Science Associates 1,936.50 Professional Services-J-77 46622 Heat Technology Products 14,150A0 Repair Services-(2)Heat Exchangers 46523 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 39.50 Meeting Expenses 46524 Hill Brothers 15,111.94 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 46525 Home Depot 158.54 Small Hardware 46526 Horizon Technology 1,406.38 Lab Parts&Supplies 46527 Hylom 15.567.17 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46528 Idexx 8,016.60 Lab Parts&Supplies 46529 Imaging Express 209.01 Printer Maintenance 465W Industrial Distribution Group 889.19 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46531 Industrial Metal Supply 223A1 Metal 46532 Industrial Networking Solutions 1,00D.71 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46533 Infinity Technology USA 2,977.40 Computer Supplies 46534 Information Resources 375.00 Human Resources Service 46535 Intelligence Press,Inc. 1,245.00 Publication 46536 Interstate Battery Systems 105.90 Batteries 46537 Ionics Instrument Business Group 989.35 Lab Parts&Supplies 46538 Iron Mountain 225.00 Bid Document Storage Fees-P137&J-39 46539 IBM Corp. 275.94 Maint.Agreement-Orange County Data System-Revenue Division 46540 J.L.Wingert Company 2,411.59 Pump Supplies 46541 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 9,120.31 Meter Pit Line Repair, Bypass Line Installation&Curb Mounted Gas Flaps 46542 Jays Catering 626.04 Meeting Expenses 46543 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 2.722.66 Professional Services-Compensation&Classification Study 46544 CSC Parts Sales/Johnson Controls, Inc. 136.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46545 Johnstone Supply 101.93 Electrical Supplies 46546 Kensington Electronics 694.60 Electrical Supplies 46547 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 379.18 Lab Parts&Supplies 46548 Lab Support 2.293-75 Temporary Employment Services 46549 Lascomm 3,957.71 Computer SoftwarefHardware 46550 Lawrence Ragan Communications, Inc. 199.00 Subscription 46551 Ldecom-Safety,Inc. 489.33 Repair&Calibration of Sulfide Monitoring Equipment 46562 Line-X Protective Coatings 3,334.00 Truck Bed Coatings 46553 Luccrs 200.00 Meeting Expense 46554 Maintenance Technology Corp. 659.05 Mechanical Supplies 46555 Marilyn Shepard 700.00 Prof.Services-Pipeline Assessment&Certification Training 46556 The Marketing Group, Inc. 2,113.95 Computer Hardware Software 46557 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 651.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46558 MCRay Industries,Inc. 9,195.68 Fittings&Fasteners 46559 Mee Analytical System 1.465.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46560 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 456.47 Mechanical Parts&Repairs 46561 Media Clips,Inc. 446.13 Notices&Ads 46562 Medlin Controls Co. 103.24 Instrument Supplies 46563 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 2,909.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46564 Minadk 573.06 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46565 Mission Uniform Service 4,265.96 Uniform Rentals 46566 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyworks 168.88 Truck Tool Box Painting Service 46567 MSA No Mag Systems 1.508.69 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46568 National Microcomp Services 1,212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 46569 Neal Supply Co. 3.194.93 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46570 NeWersant of Southern California 7,709.26 Human Resources Security System Improvements :46571 Newark Electronics 97.80 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46572 Nimbus Press 25.00 Publication 46573 NAFA,Inc. 415.00 Membership 46574 NAS Associates, Inc. 1.656.15 Toxicity Testing 46575 O.C.Business Journal 158.00 Publication 46576 Office Depot Business Servfms Div. 737.56 Office Supplies 46577 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 148.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46578 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 611.37 Fittings 46579 Oxygen Service Company 1,937.63 Specialty Gases 46580 OCB Reprographics 4.389.45 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 46581 Pacific Bell 68.23 Telephone Services 46582 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 46583 Pacific Ford 19,682.45 (2)Ford F-150 112 Ton Pick-Up Trucks 46584 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1.229.35 Plumbing Supplies 46585 Pactfc Parts&Controls 14,285.07 Computer Hardware/Software 46586 Parker Supply Company 11.737.16 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46587 Parkhouse Tire Co. 1,611.32 Tires 46588 Parts Unlimited 71.45 Automotive Parts&Supplies 46589 Patriot Video Productions 1,216.05 Video Editing Services 46590 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 15,336.87 Caustic Soda 46591 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 4,696.60 Sodium Hypochlorte 46592 Power Design 4.263.46 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46593 Power Eleclro Supply Co.,Inc. 30.35 Electrical Supplies 46594 Praxair,Inc. 10.45 Lab Supplies 46595 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 568.10 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 46596 Primary Source 706.61 Office Furniture 46597 Professional Publications, Inc. 194.96 Publication 46598 Projects Partners 10,737.92 Temporary Employment Services 46599 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 10,484.D4 CCTV Sewerline Inspection-2-41 46600 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 3,577.30 Pumps 46601 PAPA 170.00 Membership&O&M Training Registration 46602 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 504.56 Instrument Supplies 46603 R.W.Beck 11,965.20 Professional Services P7-90 c Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 08/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46604 R.Altman&Associates 595.00 Communications Meeting Registration 46605 Relnbow Disposal Co. 174.00 Trash Removal 46606 Regents of Univ.of California 13,768.59 Professlonal Services J-85 46607 Reliesler Bankers Security Life Ins. 16,853.50 Emp. Life Ins.Premium,Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ins.Payroll Deductions 46608 RPM Electric Motors 1.177.06 111 Motor&Repair Services 46609 Saybolt,L.P. 1.800.00 Air Analyses 46610 Schwing America,Inc. 2,473.97 Pump Supplies 46611 Scott Specialty Gems,Inc. 608.39 Lob Pans&Supplies 46612 See-Bird Electronics,Inc. 465.00 Lab Maintenance&Calibration of CTD Profiling Sensors 46613 Seaventures 3,500.OD Ocean Monitoring Vessel 46614 Shamrock Supply Co'., Inc. 102.80 Tools 46615 Sheshunoff 289.95 Publication 46616 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,070.63 Repairs&Maintenance Materials 46617 Supelco,Inc. 131.68 Lab Supplies 46618 Smarden Supply Company/Orange Coast 23.62 Plumbing Supplies 46619 So.Cal.Gas Company 21,317.50 Natural Gas 46620 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 486.00 AQMD&State Fees 46621 Southern California Edison 2,719.43 Power 46622 Stanley Steamer International,Inc. 72.00 Carpet Cleaning Service 46623 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Co. 63.44 Legal Services-COP Trustee 46624 Strata International,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 46625 Summit Steel 475.68 Metal 46626 Sunset Ford 786.11 Automotive Pans&Supplies 46627 Sunset Industrial Parts 691.39 Mechanical Supplies 46628 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 17,765.13 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 46629 STL Sacramento 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 46630 Temrinlx International Co. 275.00 Pest Control 46631 Tetra Tech, Inc. 9,740.98 Professional Services 7-37 46632 The Orange County Register 736.88 Notices&Ads 46633 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1.737.09 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46534 ThyssenKmpp Elevator 198.00 Elevator Maintenance 46635 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 296.26 Locks&Keys 46636 Toshiba International Corporation 1.237.10 Electrical Supplies 46637 Transcat 2,497.75 Electrical Supplies 46638 Tri-State Seminar On the-River 41.00 O&M Training Registration 46639 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 6,794.76 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 46640 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 380.07 Automotive Supplies 46641 Teksystems 800.00 Temporary Employment Services 46642 US Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 46643 Ultra Scientific 515.03 Lob Pens&Supplies 46644 The Unisource Corporation 71.07 Office Supplies 46645 United Parcel Service 56.38 Parcel Services 46646 Universal Specialties, Inc. 27.81 Plumbing Supplies 46647 Vellen Safety Supply Company 90.02 Safety Supplies Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From OB/01/02 to 08/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46648 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 5,760.00 Temporary Employment Service 46649 Varian Associates,Inc. 1,376.65 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 46650 Verizon California 4,137.55 Telephone Services 46651 Veme's Plumbing 604.00 Service Contract-Repair Backflow Devices 46652 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,453.80 Vision Service Premium 46653 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,271.47 Lab Pans 8 Supplies 46654 The Wackenhut Corporation 4,464.94 Security Guards 46655 Waxie Sanitary Supply 384.46 Janitorial Supplies 46656 Watson Wyatt Data Services 399.00 Publication 46657 Nexiq Technologies 185.95 Maintenance 8 Repair Services 46658 WOI 350.00 0 8 M Training Registration 46659 Xerox Corporation 4.614.12 Fax&Copier Leases 46660 Zymark Corporalion 4,500.00 Service Contract-Zymale Robotic System 46661 3CMA 1.186.00 Membership 8 Communication Meeting Registration 46662 Patrick B.Carnahan 594.42 Meetingffmining Expense Reimbursement 46663 Janet L.Gray 432.62 Meeting/Training Expanse Reimbursement 46664 Denise M.Martinez 410.95 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46665 Hoang,Tyler 8 Costce 1,228.39 Employee Computer Loan Program 46666 Orange County Sanitation District 1,100.00 Petty Cash Ralmb. 46667 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 358.53 Permit Fees Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,438,557.05 Pavroll Disbursements 27333-27333 Interim Paycheck $ 526.04 Termination Paycheck 27334-27459 Employee Paychecks 158,029.18 Shveekly Payroll 08M7/02 75501 -75969 Direct Deposit Statements 807,745.96 Biweekly Payroll 08/07/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 966,301.18 Wlro Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 350,000.00 August Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 120,389.07 Societe Generale July Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 43,825.54 July Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Manhattan Bank 77,347.93 Commitment Fee on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Societe Generale 54,646.44 Standby Letter of Credit for 1992 Refunding COPS Lloyd's TSB Bank plc 80.622.61 Letter of Credit Fee for 1992 Refunding COPS-511/02 to 8/1/02 Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 726,831.59 Total Claims Paid 08/01102-08115/02 $ 9,131,689.83 Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT k Claims Paid From 08116102 to 08/31/02 Wamant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 46668 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation $ 39.459.56 Professional Services-CSG Fuel Mixing For Emission Control 46669 Gaybar 31,809.74 Computer Hardware/Software-(20)Communication Adapters 46670 Northwest Industrial Scrub, Inc. 41.038.00 Digester Cleaning Service 46671 Orange County Sanitation District 544,697.76 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 46672 Southern California Edison 57,027.36 Power 46673 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 19.64 Mechanical Supplies 46674 AEHMS 450.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 46675 Americen Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 150.86 Telephone Service 46676 Court Omer 62620 Wage Garnishment 46677 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 46678 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 6,784.00 Replacement of UPS at Pit.2 46679 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 562.80 Plumbing Supplies 46680 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 105.60 Encroachment Permit-Warner Ave.Trunk Sewer Improv. 46681 County Wholesale Electric Co. 115.28 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46682 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 231.64 Paint Supplies 46683 Employee Benefls Specialists,Inc. 8.321.31 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 46684 Court Order - 525.00 Wage Garnishment 46685 City of Fountain Valley 1,992.64 Security Services 46686 Industrial Metal Supply 250.86 Metal 46687 Inspection Technologies,Inc. 92.08 Cable 46688 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Loral 501 3,159.75 Dues Deduction 45669 Irvine Ranch Water District 60.60 Water Use 46690 League Of CA Cities 129.68 Admin Meeting Registration 46691 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 94A6 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46692 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 3,127.50 Repairs&Reconditioning of Gearbox Shafts 46693 Motion Industries 335.56 Valves - 46694 National Bond&Trust 1,175.06 U.S.Savings Bonds 46695 Orange County Sheriff 45.00 Wage Garnishment 46696 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 116.28 Fittings 46697 OCEA 478.36 Dues Deduction 46698 Pacific Bell 1.179.68 Telephone Services 46699 Pacific Process Equipment,Inc. 3.140.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46700 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 46701 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 46702 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,062.00 Dues Deduction 46703 Court Order 721.50 Wage Gamishment 46704 Southern California Edison 66.82 Power 46705 SAW PA 15,000.00 Prof.Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 46706 Taylor-Dunn 540.81 Electric Cart Parts 46707 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,368.32 Mechanical Supplies&Repairs 46708 Tustin Dodge 170.25 Truck Supplies 46709 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions '46710 USGTRG Conference on Biofiltalion 700.00 0&M Meeting Registration 46711 Verizon California 3,489.63 Telephone Services Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 08/16/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46712 The Well Street Journal 188.56 Subscription 46713 WEF 295.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 46714 Shabbir S.Basrai 100.21 MeetingRreining Expense Reimbursement 46715 William D.Cassidy 280.58 Meeting/Raining Expense Reimbursement 46716 Robert P.Ghselli 900.44 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 46717 Ingrid G.Hellebrand 794.47 MeetingRralnirlg Expense Reimbursement 46718 Sonja A.Wassgren 226A4 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement 46719 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 24,557.50 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 46720 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist, 16,730.04 Annual Emission,Operation 8 Misc Fees 46721 Air Products 8 Chemicals 25,768.02 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 48722 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 65,344.16 Professional Services J-73.2 46723 Black 8 Veatch Corporation 153,019.90 Engineering Services P2-85,J-77&J-71.3 46724 Blue Cross of California 271,630.81 Medical Insurance Premium 46725 Boyle Engineering Corporation 43,803.29 Engineering Services 1-2-4 46726 Brown 8 Caldwell 121,899.79 Engineering Services 2-41,Pt-37 8 J-25.6 46727 Camito Engineers 386.901.29 Engineering Services P2-66 8 J-87 46728 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 44.414.74 (41)Computers 8 Software 46729 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. 150,068.58 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 46730 Lee&Ro,Inc. 90,842.09 Engineering Services P2-39,SAS,5-51 8 5-52 46731 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 49,825.69 Water Use Efficiency Program MO9-22-99 46732 Orange County Water District 60.794.05 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 46733 Palnewebber Incorporated 32,576.01 COP Remarketing Agreement-1993 Sad"Certificates of Participation 46734 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 144.525.53 Chemicals 46735 R.W.Back 139.735.06 Professional Services 3-52.5-53.5.54 8 11-28 46736 Sanoon Engineering,Inc. 31,200,00 Construction Manhole Rehabilitation B Repairs 46737 Synagro Technologies, Inc. 209.236.64 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 46738 The Lewis Group 64.237.29 Consulting Service-Capital Project Management Process 46739 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 130,006.14 Residuals Removal MO 349-95 46740 U.S.Peroxide 94,260.44 Hydrogen Peroxide 46741 Vector Resources 26.446.86 Computer Hardware/Soft"re-Chlorination Project 46742 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 76,328.91 Engineering Service J-67 46743 Woodruff,Spradlin 8 Smart 166,686.57 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 40744 The Yakima Company 43,509.40 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 46745 Connolly-Pacific Company 200.236.00 Construction J-39 46746 Elser Constructors,Inc. 38.631.42 Construction 3-25 46747 J W Contracting Corporation 367,439.00 Construction P2460 46748 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,229,123.00 Construction P137 46749 Mike Prlich 8 Sons 235,000.00 Construction-Abandonment of Alrbase Trunk Sewer(Contract 6-13-2) 46750 Southern Contracting Company 29,159.00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention 46751 Union Bank of California 43,604.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 46752 Able Scale Repair 550.00 Loading Scales Quarterly Inspection 46753 AccuSlardard, Inc. 748.95 Lab Parts&Supplies 46754 Great Arrrerican Printing Co. 239.79 Printing -46755 Agilenl Technologies,Inc. 160.57 Lab Parts&Supplies 46756 Airbome Express 156.26 Air Freight Page 2 of EXHIBIT ' Claims Paid From 08/16/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46757 Alrgas Safely 107.83 Safely Supplies 46758 American Water Works Assoc./Water Dually 117.00 Membership 46759 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 591.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 4676D Aquarium Doctor 156.37 Lab Aquarium Services 46761 Aquatic Bloassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 7.040.00 Toxicity Testing 46762 ABM Business Machines,Inc. 192.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46763 AMF Electronics,Inc. 139.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46764 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 64.83 Telephone Service 46765 Ballantyne,Inc. 13,746.00 Temporary Employment Services 46766 Basic Chemical Solutions 17,116.89 Chemicals 46767 Battery Specialties 1,061.05 Batteries 46768 Camel Financial,Inc.do Bearing Metal 556,49 Metal 46769 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 1,164.81 Piping Supplies 46770 Boot Bam 98.96 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 46771 Blatt&Associates,Inc. 6.312.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 46772 Scumem California Marine Institute 10,710.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 46773 Callan Associates, Inc. 3.550.00 Investment Advisor&Performance Monitoring Services 46774 Caluni,Inc. 1,210.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46775 Carleton Engineers&Consultants,Inc. 4,043.10 Engineering Services-Air Duality 46776 Cashce,Inc.,C/O Portion Ind..Inc. 1.779.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46777 Cecil Los Hing&Associates,Inc. 16,430.72 Legal Services-Dist.vs.County of Kern 46778 Ce112Ce11 460.88 Telephone&Pager Supplies 46779 Center for Creative Growth 1,25D.00 O&M Management Coaching 46780 Communications Supply Corp. 14,193.46 Computer Hardware/Software 46781 CDmIldated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 5.167.27 Electrical Supplies 46782 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,499.28 Plumbing Supplies 46783 Cooper Energy Services 362.99 Engine Supplies 46784 Corporate Express 357.60 Office Supplies 46785 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 70.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46786 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 5,044.76 Over Apportionment Refund&Radio Maintenance Agreement 46787 County Sanitation Dists of Los Angeles 3,400.00 Olfactometry Lab Analyses 46788 County Wholesale Electric Co. 126.77 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46789 Cytec Industries 18,661.50 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 46790 CH2M Hill 16,564.37 Professional Service-Odor Screening 46791 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation 8.941.52 Chemicals 46792 CWEA Membership 92.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 46793 Del Mar Analytical 1,836.00 Blosolids Analysis 48794 Della Packaging Products,Inc. 134.22 Lab Supplies 46795 Darius,Inc. 362.51 Drum Platform 46796 DlgiPhoto 11.60 Photographic Services 46797 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 7,478.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 46798 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 63.38 Paint Supplies 46799 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 443.28 Electrical Supplies '46800 Ecology Control Industries 6,476.86 Hazardous Waste Disposal 46801 Elliott Bay Design Group 1,140.85 Prof.Sam.-Prelimanry Design Cost Analysis for Ocean Monitoring Vessel. Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT 13 Claims Paid From 08116/02 to 08/31102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46802 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 467.65 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-June 2002 46803 Enchanter,Inc. 3,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 46804 Environmental Science Associates 17,731.45 Professional Services J-40-5 46806 ENS Resources, Inc. 4,113.23 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 46806 FedEv Corporation 115.81 Air Freight 46807 Filarsky&Wag.L.L.P. 4.465.00 Prof.Services-SPMT Negotiations&Special Services 46808 Filler Supply Company 331.20 Filters&Oil 46809 Fisher Scieng0c Company,L.L.C. 6,841.73 Lab Pans&Supplies 46810 Flat and Venial, Inc. 270.00 Drilling at Pit.2 Hezdworks 46811 Foodors8 Coffee&Refreshment Services 21 AS Meeting Supplies 46812 Fountain Valley Camera 14.31 Photo Supplies 46813 Fountain Valley Palms,Inc. 238.47 Paint Supplies 46814 Franklin Covey 434.92 Office Supplies 46815 Fys Electronics 665.78 Computer Supplies 46816 Full Spectrum Analytics 702.23 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Auto Sampler 46817 FST Sand and Gravel,Inc. 201.00 Road Base Materials 46818 General Petroleum 337.15 Unleaded Gasoline 46819 George Yardley Co. 249.16 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46820 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 1,750.94 Bell Filter Press Supplies 46821 WIN Grainger, Inc. 265.23 Electrical Pans&Supplies 46822 Greybar 3,849.33 Cabinets for CRISP System-Bacteria Reduction Program 46823 Hach rlo Ponton Industries 140.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 46824 American Signal Inc. 1,734.78 Lab Supplies 46825 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 46826 Harrington Industrial Pleslim.Inc. 125.52 Plumbing Supplies 46827 Hasoo OR Co.,Inc. 80.27 Luba Oil 46828 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 8.694.35 Engine Generator Control Supplies 46829 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 84.75 Meeting Expenses 46830 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 2.44123 Office Furniture 46831 Hill Brothers 20,14925 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 46832 HIM,Inc. 4,231.95 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 46833 Hoerbiger Servica, Inc. 835.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46634 Home Depot 873.37 Small Hardware 46835 Hopkins Technical Products 1,224.20 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46836 Idexx 3,353.18 Lab Parts&Supplies 46837 Imaging Express 312.77 Printer Maintenance 46838 Industrial Distribution Group 2,149.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46839 Industrial Networking Solutions 998.52 Power Supply 46840 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 88.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46841 IBM 887.22 Software Support-.AS400 46842 Interstate Battery Systems 495.11 Batteries 46843 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1.499.88 Ins.Parts&Supplies 46644 Iron Mountain 75.00 Bid Document Storage Fees-Pl-37 ' 46845 Iron Mountain OH-Site Data Protection 212.71 Offshe Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 46846 Irvine Ranch Water District 22.66 Water Use Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT B ` Claims Paid From 08/76/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Oescrip0on 46847 IOMA,Inc. 268.95 Subscription 46848 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 818.90 Tragic Signs 46849 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 21.959.71 Installation of Handralls at Pit.2 46850 Jim's Suspension Service 30.00 Automotive Parts&Supplies 46851 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 6.531.21 Professional Services-Benefits Survey and Compensatlon&Classification Study 46852 FormsTronicsRichards Capital Corporation 1.212.72 Stationery&Office Supplies 46853 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 7.332.65 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 46854 Kars Advance Materials,Inc. 6,458.00 Can Gen Engine No.2 Testing&Evaluation 46855 KL&P Marketing 1.361.29 Safety Incentive Items 46856 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 241.62 Safety Supplies 46857 Lab Support .. 4,079.60 Temporary Employment Services 46858 Labeltronix 4,440.00 Maintenance Agreement-Zebra Printers 46859 Law/Crandall 656.00 Eng.Sow.-Materials Testing,Inspection&Geotechnical Services for CIP Projects 46860 Unjer Company do Gerald Jones 8,555.49 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 40861 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 11,016.43 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 46862 Manleys Boller Repair Company, Inc. 2,670.00 Boiler Repair 46863 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 1,241.30 Executive Disability Insurance Plan Premium 46864 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 412.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46865 McRay Industries,Inc. 9,997.56 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 46866 Media Clips, Inc. 55.00 Notices&Ads 46867 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 1,180.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yaklma Sites Study 46868 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 13.383.28 Mechanical Parts&Repairs-High Pressure Air Compressor 46869 Mission Uniform Service 3,936.75 Uniform Rentals 46870 MDS Consulting 1,350.00 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 46871 Neal Supply Co. 383.54 Plumbing Supplies 46872 Network Catalyst, Inc. 3,534.38 Computer Software/Hardware 46873 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 320.00 Training Registration 45874 Newark Electronics 118.42 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46875 City of Newpon Beach 76A2 Water Use 46876 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1,403.00 Oil 46877 Nlnyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 60.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 46878 The Norco Companies 158.00 Mall Delivery Service 46879 NCG Porter Novella,Inc. 1,000.00 Prof.Services-Public Relations 46880 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3.491.77 09ice Supplies 46881 Omega Industrial Supply,Inc. 508.38 Janitorial Supplies 46882 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 186.09 Electrical Parts&Supplies 46883 The Orange County Register 380.83 Subscription 46884 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 281.89 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46865 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.00 Quarterly Maintenance,Testing It Certification of Fire Sprinkler Sys.At Pits. 1 &2 46886 Oxygen Service Company 2,219.29 Lab Spedalty Gases 46887 OCB Reprographics 721.54 Printing Service-M01126/00 46888 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 663.16 Air Conditioner Filters 46889 Pace Analytic Services 1,550.00 Professional Services-Wastewater&Biosolids Analyses 46890 Pacific Bell 40.72 Telephone Services 46891 Pacific Mechanical Supply 818.68 Plumbing Supplies Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 08/16/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46892 Pacific Pans 8 Controls 1.077.69 Instrument Supplies 46893 Pacific Slates Chemical, Inc. 3,516.77 Chemicals 46894 Paco/Johnslon Pump 183.48 Pump Supplies 46895 Parts Unlimited 62.39 Automotive Repairs 8 Parts 46896 Primary Source 583.19 Office Furniture 46897 Projects Partners 24.628.82 Temporary Employment Services 46898 HOBman Southwest Corporation 13,113.40 Sawar ine Cleaning 46899 PCS Express 220.00 Courier Service 46900 Duality Soldering,Inc. 74.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46901 Ramsay Corporation 333.00 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 46902 Realtime Systems Corporation 15,78125 Software Consulting Services 46903 Roto Rooter 375.00 Sewer Lateral Cleaning 46904 Ryan Hem Products Corp. 2.118.31 Pump Supplies 46905 RBF Engineers 1.300.00 Engineering Services 2.24-1 46906 RMS Engineering 8 Design,Inc. 5,000.00 Engineering Services-Basin M Repairs 46907 Saddle Island Institute 2.025.00 Engineering Training Registration 46908 Schwing America, Inc. 498.53 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 46909 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 42.17 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 46910 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 215.00 Maintenance 8 Calibration of CTD Profiling Sensors 46911 Shortridge Instruments, Inc. 2.775.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 46912 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 33.40 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 46913 SoOCholce 203.65 Software Maintenance Contract Services 46914 Solder Station One Inc. 274.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 46915 Sperling Inst.clo Patten Corporate 2.672.71 Magnetic Flow Meter 46916 Summit Steel 419.17 Metal 46917 Sunset Industrial Parts 257.25 Mechanical Supplies 46918 SPX Valves 8 Coniml 9,083.58 Valves 8 Mechanical Parts 46919 Techno Coatings 9,908.00 Coating Repairs-Low Pressure Digester Gas Holder Tank at Pit.2 46920 Telatrac,Inc. 245.00 Airtime Services 8 Software/Hardware Maintenance 46921 Thermo Elemental 820.00 Software Installation 8 Data Transfer Services 46922 Thermo Forma.Inc. 2,718.05 Lab Instrument Warranty Extension 46923 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,666.23 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 46924 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1.280.00 Elevator Maintenance 46925 Todd Anderson 3,390.00 Professional Services J-85 46926 Toms Lock 8 Safe Service 8 Sales 21.59 Locks 8 Keys 46927 Tran Consulting Engineers 6,486.00 Engineering Services J-66 46928 Transcat 2.006.19 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 46929 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 380.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 46930 Track 8 Auto Supply,Inc. 47.32 Automotive Parts 8 Supplies 46931 Teksysterm 4,642.00 Temporary Employment Services 46932 US Filter Corporation 1216.82 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 46933 Ultra Scientific 308.30 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 46934 United Parcel Service 532.49 Parcel Services '46935 Defense Finance and Accounting 19,616.75 Professional Services J-85 46936 Unocal 78 9,309.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT 8 - �' Claims Paid From 08116/02 to 08/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 46937 U-Line 189.42 Office Supplies 46938 Vallen Safety Supply Company 91.14 Safety Supplies 46939 Valtech Energy Management 450.00 Consulting Services-Natural Gas 46940 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 11,688.00 Temporary Employment Service 46941 Verizon California 638.38 Telephone Services 46942 Vortex Corp. 2,363.00 Door Repair 46943 V L Systems, Inc. 13,156.81 Software Upgrade 46944 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 5.118.05 Lab Pans&Supplies 46945 The Wackenhut Corporation 13,015.55 Security Guards 46946 Water Environment Federation 112.00 Membership 46947 Waxie Sanitary Supply 464.79 Janitorial Supplies 46948 Weber Scientific 1,465.02 Lab Parts&Supplies 46949 Westbay Solutions Group 2,500.00 Technical Services Training Registration 46M Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 55.31 Electrical Paris&Supplies 46951 Wilhelm Electric Co.,Inc. 956.00 Construction-Potholing for Underground Fiberoptic Line at Pit. 1 46952 W EFTEC 2002 Uo Expoexchange 945.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 46953 WQI 360.00 O&M Training Registration 46954 Xerox Corporation 984.72 Fax&Copier Lessee 46955 York International 326.94 Oil 46956 Zee Medical 154.78 First Aid Supplies 46957 California Bank&Trust 3.240.00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention 46958 Blake Anderson 230.50 Mesting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 46959 Norman Eckenrode 1,526.22 Meetingri'minirg Expense Reimbursement 46960 Jerry F.Evangelista 595.00 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement 46961 Liu Murphy 843.86 Meegng(Tralning Expense Reimbursement 46962 James W.Siva 423.32 Meefing/Training Expense Reimbursement 46963 Mahin Talebl 1,143.23 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 46964 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 100.00 Annexation Penult Fees 46965 Local Agency Formation Commission 360.00 Annexation Permit Fees 46966 Ludwin,David 1,758.74 Employee Computer Loan Program 46967 Stale of California 154.00 Annexation Permit Fees Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 6.196.763.95 Payroll Disbursements 27460-27564 Employee Paychecks $ 159,44DA4 Biweekly Payroll OM1/02 27565-27565 Interim Paycheck 319.38 Reimbursement for Discontinued Withholding 75970-76433 Direct Deposit Statements 828,031.70 Biweekly Payroll 08/21102 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 997.791.52 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA,N.A. $ 372.622.44 August Interest Payment on Sense 2000 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 372,622.44 Total Claims Paid 0 811610 2-8131102 $ 7,557,167.91 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT B r aj DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, August 28, 2002 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, August 28, 2002 at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel Shirley McCracken, Chair Don Hughes Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Ryal Wheeler Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Scott Baugh Russell Patterson, Chairman, PDC Committee Jan Vandersloot Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee Joey Racano Jim Silva,County Supervisor Larry Porter Randy Fuhrman Directors Absent: Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair STAFF PRESENT: Gary Streed, Acting General Manager and Director of Finance Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Jim Colston, Sr. Regulatory Specialist Sonja Wassgren, Public Information Specialist Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Dr. Jan Vandersloot thanked the Steering Committee and the Board for their July 17 decision. He asked that the public be kept apprised of the 30:30 Committee actions and that they be allowed to be involved. Larry Porter asked that the Steering Committee direct staff and the general manager to notify The Register that the problem is not just bacteria. Randy Fuhrman suggested that the mission statement be revised to include increasing wastewater reclamation. Joey Racano said that the District should not be doing its own studies because of the perception of impropriety. He also said that we should be working on eliminating endocrine disruptors. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 August 28, 2002 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the June 26,2002 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Shirley McCracken reported that Steve Anderson, Brian Brady, Norm Eckenrode and Jim Silva attended the CASA conference in Monterey. They commented that the meetings were very informative. Chair McCracken reported that the GW RS JPA with the Orange County Water District appears to be moving forward and that agreement in principle has been reached. The schedule is to release the draft agreement on September 12 and the JCC will review it at its September 16 meeting. This Steering Committee will review it on September 25 and the District's standing committees and the Board will consider it at their October meetings. OCW D will also move it through their approval process at the same time. Chair McCracken recognized the contributions of former Chairs Jan Debay and Norm Eckenrode. Chair McCracken reported that Gary Streed is acting General Manager while Blake Anderson is on vacation. Mr.Anderson will return September 16. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER A. Update on FOG Management Issues Bob Ghirelli reported that the County FOG (Fats, Oils, Grease)ordinance is being developed to deal with grease from restaurants. This ordinance is the result of an Orange County Grand Jury investigation. At this time the ordinance is only applicable to restaurants in the unincorporated area of Orange County. It will require that new restaurants have grease interrupters installed and that the inspectors from the Health Care Agency review the paperwork to ensure proper recordkeeping is being done. The ordinance will not have much of an impact on the Sanitation District, but we are funding in part a study that will result in a list of best management practices and best applied technology available. We have offered to field test some of the recommended equipment. The Committee members questioned Supervisor Silva about the possibility of contracting with the County Health Care Agency to have them perform the same type of oversight for the cities,as each city will be required to have a FOG management plan as well. Supervisor Silva indicated that the County should be the lead agency and would require a revenue stream to support the program. The role of the Sanitation District has yet to be determined. B. Grantsmanship: A DC Initiative Mr. Ghirelli also provided a briefing on the proposed plan to secure federal funding for secondary treatment facilities. In the past, there have been federal construction grants and special legislation to assist with the funding. However, in order to take advantage of these programs, we need to mount a concerted effort in Washington, working through our representative, ENS. A proposal has been received from ENS for short-term services to generate support with the legislators and their staff members, as well as support from the various associations. Questions and discussion followed by the directors, mostly expressing concern about the viability of undertaking these Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 • August 28, 2002 efforts at this time of the year when Congress is pretty much in recess and the legislators are not in Washington. After discussion, Chair McCracken asked that staff share the directors concerns with the general manager and bring the issue back to the committee with more detailed information on what services will be provided for long- term efforts. At that time the Committee will decide whether to proceed with a second phase. C. Update on Ocean Permit Issues This discussion was moved to Closed Session. Gary Streed reported that the FAHR Committee meeting had been changed to September 18 to avoid any conflict with September 11 memorial events. The Employees Activity Committee, on behalf of the employees and at their own expense, will install a large flag pole and plaque at the front entrance at Plant 1 and a similar plaque will be installed near the flag pole at Plant 2. A short dedication ceremony will be held on September 11. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Woodruff announced a need for a closed session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1), has arisen since the publishing of the Agenda. The item was agendized for open session. The closed session is necessary and will discuss possible litigation in view of the District being advised earlier this date of a petition for adjudicatory hearing being filed by legal counsel for the Natural Resources Defense Fund, with the State of California, Water Resources Control Board. It was moved, seconded and approved to move Item B.B.to closed session. Mr.Woodruff also described several changes that are being considered to Resolution No. OCSD 01.23, Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the District. These are minor clean-up items providing more definition on committee assignments, time limits for speaking, and conference and meeting attendance. After discussion, it was agreed that the only change was related to Director's assignments to the OMTS Committee. The revised resolution will be submitted to the Steering Committee and the Board in December. The Chair ordered that the closed session be taken out of order at this time. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 5:46 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Section 54956.9(b)(1), to discuss possible legislation. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. The Committee reported that it directed General Counsel and staff to monitor the petition proceedings at the SWRCB and to represent and defend the District's interests. At 6:16 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 August 28,2002 (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-D) A. Consider need for Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff meeting in September Bob Ghirelli updated the committee on some of the activities that have taken place since the last meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee in February. The Committee thought that it was time for another meeting on September 26. Director Don Bankhead has been appointed chair of that committee. B. Update on 30:30 Action Plan (NPDES Permit Renewal) Bob Ghirelli and Jim Colston provided an update on staff activities since July 17 and described the permit renewal options that will be discussed with EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board in San Francisco tomorrow, September 29. The draft mission statement was reviewed and the Committee asked that a statement on water reclamation be included. Mr.Colston provided additional information on actions taken by the California Senate's Environmental Quality Committee on AB 1969. This bill was designed to grant an exemption to the District for mandatory minimum penalties during the transition period to secondary treatment. Monthly progress updates will be provided to the Steering Committee and the Board concerning the permit renewal. Bob Dolan reported on the results of disinfection and the increase in secondary treatment that has been brought on line. A monthly update report will be provided to the Steering Committee and the Board on these items. C. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in September were reviewed. D. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS,COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 August 28,2002 (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 25,2002 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 25, 2002 at 7 p.m. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Submitted by: J n Tappan Bring Committee Secretary O.'IW EMaW'.vLKIeeM1N GmMsbT4gILlI@PaRSL MFusalx 1 ! Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, September 4, 2002—5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on September 4,2002, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present,as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Bob Doter, Director of Operations &Maintenance James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Don Bankhead Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Ken Blake Mike Moore, ECM Manager Debbie Cook Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager Tony Kawashima Layne Baroldi, Senior Regulatory Specialist Anna Piercy Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Tod Ridgeway Pam Koester Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Others: Directors Absent: Randy Fuhrman Doug Korthoff Joey Racano Larry Porter Jan Vandersloot (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Doug Korthoff, Joey Racano, Larry Porter, Jan Vanderslcot and Randy Fuhrman expressed concerns regarding Agenda Items OMTS02-57, Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Project, and OMTS02-58, Biosolids Management. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance p and Technical Services Committee - Page 2 September 4, 2002 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER _ The General Manager was not present. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the August 7, 2002 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting was approved as drafted and ordered filed. Director Kawashima abstained b. OMTS02-54 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. C. OMTS02-55 Receive and file Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance,financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 6(a)through (c) under Consent Calendar. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS02-56 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1)Approve funding for agencies that require additional flow monitoring and updates to Master Plans and Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Plans in the amount of$229,750; (2)Approve funding for the FY 2002-03 Cooperative Projects Program in the amount of$125,000,for the City of Anaheim; (3)Approve time extensions to Cooperative Projects Program contracts with the following cities: Cypress (CP-0103), Fountain Valley(CP-0002 and CP-0104),Garden Grove(CP-0003 and CP-0119), La Habra (CP-0106, CP-0126 and CP-0127), Orange(CP-0009, CP-0010, CP-0011 and CP-0012), Santa Ana (CP-0016).Villa Park(CP-0013 and CP-0014);and, - t Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee - Page 3 September 4, 2002 (4) Authorize the General Manager to approve time extensions for projects that include flow monitoring which are delayed due to lack of rain. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. OMTS02-57 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$1,655,000 for Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Project, SP-90, as an alternative treatment to achieve secondary treatment standards; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Project, SP-90, providing for engineering services, equipment testing, design and construction improvements to the existing test facility, in an amount not to exceed $1,555,000, which includes a $200,000 contingency. Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager, described the microfiltration treatment process and the four elements that would be studied as part of Phase 11. Phase I was considered successful in demonstrating that microfiltrabon can reliably produce a solids- and bacteria-free effluent at capital and operating costs comparable to traditional treatment technology such as activated sludge. But additional research is needed on microfiltration solids backwash to demonstrate the feasibility of one or more unit processes, expand research to trial pretreatment technologies that will reduce the size of the microfilter installation by reducing the solids loading on the microflter, and to test pretreatment technologies to improve the biochemical oxygen demand removal to meet 30/30 treatment standards. Directors were concerned if any other agencies had conducted tests on microfiltration, and if so,why would the District repeat the same tests. Mr. Tortes responded other testing has not been done to the same level of effort this project will be considering. The underlying question is how cost effective this method would be. He mentioned there was a small, full- operating plant in Britain, and have been operating 5-7 years. This is a relatively new area of development. Directors asked if staff had discussed with other agencies to participate in the studies to help offset costs. Mr. Tortes responded that Los Angeles County Sanitation District and the City of Los Angeles did not have much of an interest in this study, but staff had not explored the possibility with any other agencies. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 September 4, 2002 A Director suggested that should the program expand to 500 million mgd or more per day and set up a bypass system with ultraviolet treatment, the District would be doing the same thing as the groundwater replenishment project,at little cost to the District. Mr. Torres stated two additional treatment steps would need to be completed. He also stated that if the Department of Health Services will accept through _ demonstration the quality of the water, the microfiltration process wouldn't be needed for the groundwater replenishment project. Concern was also expressed that American products be looked at, considered and used during the pilot program. Currently an Australian- made filter is being used in the testing. It was noted that the current budget does not include purchasing an additional microfilter, which costs approximately$300,000. It was suggested that before staff begins future research projects that a thorough search for funding and grant monies be sought to support the research rather than relying only on the ratepayers. Mr. Ghirelli responded that staff has submitted a request to the federal government for$3 million. That money would be applied towards innovative new treatment technologies such as microfiltration. It was also suggested that management consider hiring or outsourcing an expert to specifically look for grants in all different areas. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. OMTS02-58 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02- , in Support of Biosolids Recycling, and repealing Resolution No. OCSD 00-05. Layne Baroldi, Senior Regulatory Specialist, provided the Directors with a biosolids management update,discussing regulatory and legal activities in Kings, Kern and Riverside counties. He noted that Riverside County banned Class B biosolids in December 2001. Staff is proposing that landfilling be considered as one of the possible options for managing the District's biosolids and that the District's biosolids recycling policy be amended to provide this additional management flexibility. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee - Page 5 September 4, 2002 (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology was not present. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported on the District's operational treatment levels. A chart showing the month to month progress would be updated monthly. In response to a Director's question, Mr. Ooten stated that extremely low levels of byproducts are discharged through the effluent. It was then announced that the October meeting of the OMTS Committee would be held at Plant No. 2 with a tour of the microfiltration facilities beginning at 5:00 p.m. The meeting would commence after the tour. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported that the Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee would be meeting on September 26'at 4:00 p.m. The meeting would primarily be a study session. It was requested that policy issues and an update on the science behind urban runoff be discussed at the meeting. Mr. Ghirelli provided an update on AB 1969, which is legislation proposed to get relief from the minimum mandatory penalties of state law. The legislation passed through both houses and is on the governor's desk for signature. Chair McCracken will be signing a letter urging the govemor to sign the legislation. Requests will also go out to each of the Directors' cities to ask them to send letters of support. An update was then given on the meeting to discuss permit renewal negotiations with EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Overall the meeting was successful, and the agencies have indicated they will not take a punitive approach to the permit renewal. The regulators are leaning towards a judicial approach instead of an administrative approach. The next meeting with the EPA and RWQCB will be at the District on September 2r, and representatives will be attending the Steering Committee meeting that evening. (12) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not in attendance. (13) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. r Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance i and Technical Services Committee �- Page 6 September 4, 2002 (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA _ FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for October 2, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:36 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. K e Operations, Maintenan nd Technical Services Committee Secretary G:1wp,=t genda\OMTSM=2002 OMT$Minutes\050102 minut .dm OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.ofDr. 09/04/02 09/25/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMr502-56 1 12(c7 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve funding for agencies that require additional flow monitoring and updates to Master Plans and Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Plans in the amount of$229,750; and (2) Approve funding for the FY 2002-03 Cooperative Projects Program in the amount of $125,000, for the City of Anaheim; and (3) Approve time extensions to Cooperative Projects Program contracts with the following cities: Cypress (CP-0103), Fountain Valley (CP-0002 and CP-0104), Garden Grove (CP-0003 and CP-0119), La Habra (CP-0106, CP-0126 and CP-0127), Orange (CP-0009, CP-0010, CP-0011 and CP-0012), Santa Ana (CP-0016), Villa Park (CP-0013 and CP-0014); and (4) Authorize the General Manager to approve time extensions for projects that include flow monitoring which are delayed due to lack of rain. SUMMARY • The Cooperative Projects Program (Program) provides funds to local agencies for projects that reduce or eliminate inflow and infiltration (1/1)to the sewer collection system. • Contract amendments are issued to extend the completion date and invoice submittal date of projects. The Program allows only two time extensions of six months each. The first extension is included in Amendment No. 1 and is approved by the General Manager. The second extension is included in Amendment No. 2 and must be approved by the Board of Directors. • Due to lack of rain last winter, Master Plan and 1/1 Reduction Plan projects that include flow monitoring could not be completed and will require time extensions that go beyond the time frame included in Amendment No. 2. Agencies will need additional funds to redo the wet weather flow monitoring and finish the projects. • The Guidance Review Committee (GRC) recommends that amendments be issued_ to these agencies for the precise time needed to complete the projects rather than in six-month increments and additional funds be approved in the amount of$229,750 for these projects. The GRC also recommends similar types of amendments for five other special case projects that have been delayed for other reasons. �1 • The Guidance Review Committee (GRC) recommends that the General Manager be given the authority to issue time extensions for the precise amount of time necessary to complete projects that include flow monitoring projects which may be delayed because of the lack of rain. • The GRC recommends approval of the City of Anaheim flow-monitoring project submitted as part of the FY 2002-03 Cooperative Projects Program (Program) in the amount of$125,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. At this time, authorization for expenditures of$229,750 is being requested for eight existing Program projects and $125,000 for one new project under the FY 2002-03 Program. If approved, the total approved funding would increase from $12,325,493 to $12,680,243. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 159) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The total budget for the Program, Job No. J-73, is $142,675,600, and will be spent over the next 16 years on projects that reduce inflow and infiltration (1/1) throughout the Orange County Sanitation District (District). The overall budget total remains unchanged. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Program was established in 1998 to realize the District's Strategic Plan goal for 1/1 Reduction Plan. The Program is generally focused on reducing wet weather peak flows at the District's two wastewater treatment plants by 20% over a 20-year period. The District is about to embark on the fourth year of the Program (i.e., FY 2002-03). Master Plans and III Reduction Plans The Program requires agencies to prepare a Master Plan that has an 1/1 Reduction Plan component in it. The purpose of the 1/1 Reduction Plan is to identify and prioritize sources of 1/1 within each agency. In order to do this, agencies must conduct both dry weather and wet weather flow monitoring. Over the last two years, the District has approved numerous Master Plans and (1/1) Reduction Plans. Due to the lack of rain last winter, agencies that conducted flow monitoring as part of the (1/1) Reduction Plan were only able to collect dry weather flow data. In some cases, they used their entire allocated time to this activity in hopes that adequate wet weather flow data would be gathered. w,,..�: •aon, Page 2 This situation has resulted in agencies not being able to meet their approved contract schedules. In addition, they will need additional funds next year to tolled and analyze the necessary wet weather flow data. In some cases, additional funds will also be needed to prepare a more comprehensive inflow and infiltration (1/1) Reduction Plan than originally budgeted and/or to update existing Master Plans based on the wet weather flow data. Approving contract amendments is a time consuming process for both the Orange County Sanitation District and local agencies under the current Cooperative Projects Program (Program) requirements. In order to facilitate the contract amendment process, the Guidance Review Committee recommends that amendments for time extensions be issued for the time needed to complete the project rather than in six- month increments. This recommendation applies to both the projects delayed due to the lack of rain last winter and other special case projects that have been delayed for other reasons. In all cases, the extensions require Board of Directors approval because they do not conform to the current Program requirements. A summary of the projects, requested time extensions and requested additional funds is presented in Table 1. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECTS, RECOMMENDED TIME EXTENSIONS AND FUNDING REQUESTS Agency Project Project Description Time New Requested No. Extension, Completion District Mo. Date Funding,$ Brea 0101 1/1 Reduction Plan 12 5/3/03 21,000 Buena Park 0102 Master Plan 12 9/30/03 Cypress 0001 Master Plan 13 7/3103 10.000 Cypress 0103 Flow Monitoring 11 SQ8/03 Fountain Valley 0002 111 Reduction Plan CCTV 12 677/03 14,000 Fountain Valley 0104 Flow Monitoring,CCTV 8 6/7/03 16,000 Garden Grove 0003 Master Plan 16 7/1/03 27,500 Garden Grove 0119 Sewer Rehab and Flow 12 7/1/03 Monitoring Garden Grove 0116 Manhole Rehab 14 7/1103 La Habra 0106 VI Reduction Plan 12 6/14/03 31,250 La Habra 0108 yl Reduction Plan 6 10/28/03 60,000 Orange 0009 - Storm Drain Improve 8 2/28/03 Orange 0010 Storm Drain Improve 8 3/24/03 Orange 0011 Master Plan 6 10/30/02 Oren a 0012 CCTV Camera 6 10/30/02 Santa Ana 0016 Master Plan 10 6/30103 Villa Park 10113 JCCTV 1 14 6/30103 Villa Perk 0114 VI Reduction Plan 13 6/30103 50 000 TOTAL 229 750 arn.ea:vmn+ Page 3 I To further expedite the contract amendment process, the Guidance Review Committee (GRC) recommends that the General Manager be authorized to approve time extensions for specific durations on projects where flow monitoring cannot be done in accordance with the contract schedule due to the lack of rain. FY 2002-2003 Program Normally the Orange County Sanitation District (District) solicits applications for Cooperative Projects Program (Program) projects once a year (i.e., in September). In the December 12, 2001 GRC meeting, the GRC agreed to allow a second submittal of flow monitoring projects ahead of the normal yearly Program start date (i.e., as early as June) to ensure that these project contracts are approved and work can be started before the winter. For FY 2002-2003, the City of Anaheim has submitted an early application to conduct flow monitoring at 16 locations in the West Anaheim area. The GRC recommends approval of this project in the amount of$125,000. ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the time specific time extensions. Not approving the time extensions would result in project delays. Do not approve additional funding requests. Not approving the funding requests would mean that the agencies would not be able to identify sources of inflow and infiltration (1/1). Do not authorize the General Manager to approve time extensions for projects that include flow monitoring which are delayed due to lack of rain. Not authorizing the General Manager will result in a lengthy amendment process that will delay the identification of 1/1 sources. Do not approve the FY 2002-03 project. Not approving the contract will not allow the District to identify 1/1 sources in the City of Anaheim. CEQA FINDINGS Local agencies are responsible for CEQA compliance. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table PK:sa: G:1nt&l Mgenda D2fi Repoft%PDCU-73 AR Coopea0va Project 00502dm.dw Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE COOPERATIVE PROECTS PROGRAM JOB/CONTRACT NO.J-73 J rK 11v( •!.". I � y d Y 1Yq_ ORIOINMLr"'i� WIN APR �r PROPOSEb�x3IINOS TNI9PROPOiED ESTIMATED ESTIAATEU PROJECTRASK AUTNORIZEp VI{OJ1:C7 9UDp 1 I REh r AoORIZEO AUTNORISATON TOTAL EXPENDITURE .EXPENDED BUDGET BUDbET INC yl�Sl kytl Y_Q-DATE 'NEOI�E$T AOTHONIZATION TO DATE TO OATEIIG) ProlwDevelo men 49600 49600 49560 454,000 454 0 0 $ 155,000 $ 155,00D S 14 ConWtant PSA s 480.000 S 299.000 s 299.0001 S 79.957 1 7g.g5l Is 9 N51 nStaR s 3d0 0 1338000 1336000 s 310,718 S 310,710 S 27 Cw,snctlon Contmut It 148170000 140,425,000 $ 140,425,000lzmm 7501 Contraction minis on s 4,000 000 Constmdlon I PROJECT TOTAL I 149990000 142675600 142675600 $ 13297398 354]50 13652148 4923641 36% RSIm8amabla Costa 91959 PROJECT NET 149%0000 142675600 142675600 n 13297396 351750 13652148 4831662 35% it i OMTS COMMITTEE Meetin9Date To ad.or Mr. 9/9/02 9/25/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number otar50z-n um1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Air Quality & Special Projects SUBJECT: PHASE II MICROFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AS ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY TO ACHIEVE SECONDARY TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR OCEAN DISCHARGE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve a budget amendment of$1,655,000 for Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Project, SP-90, as an alternative treatment to achieve secondary treatment standards; and 2. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Project, SP-90, providing for engineering services, equipment testing, design and construction improvements to the existing test facility, in an amount not to exceed $1,555,000, which includes a $200,000 contingency. SUMMARY • District staff is currently developing plans that will outline the schedule to achieve secondary treatment standards. Due to the significant scope needed to answer the critical questions regarding microfltration as a possible treatment process to achieve a 30/30 effluent, staff recommends a fast track program so that key data will be available to staff concerning the application of microfiltration. • This fast track program will include a sole-source contract with Carollo Engineers to provide tum-key services to complete the Phase II testing within a 12-month schedule. Staff recommends selecting Carollo without a competitive selection process because Carollo performed a research pilot and the Phase I Demonstration Project and currently operates the Demonstration research site they planned, developed and built for the District. This is the only known firm that performs extensive research in this area. ca n.e,eroem„e,.,a naew Re�w +z(e)y ,en na Io um o� s� twi.� Pagel • Staff recommends retaining Carollo Engineers to continue and expand the microfiltration research to further develop the emerging technology, reduce the unit process capital and operation costs, and improve on its environmental advantages when compared to traditional secondary treatment unit processes needed to achieve the 30/30 treatment standard. • Microfiltration has proven to be reliable technology that nearly completely removes suspended solids and bacteria, but cannot remove the biochemical oxygen demand to meet the 30/30 treatment standard. • The following additional research is recommended by staff to reduce the capital costs and improve removal of the biochemical oxygen demand: 1. Perform larger scale research on the microfiltration solids backwash (recycle)to demonstrate the feasibility of one or more unit processes and to develop accurate capital and O&M costs for backwash treatment. 2. Expand the microfiltration research to trial pretreatment technologies that will reduce the size of the microfilter installation by reducing the solids loading on the microfilter that may substantially reduce the microfiltration capital and O&M cost. 3. Expand the microfittration research to test pretreatment technologies to improve the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removal to meet the 30/30 treatment standard. 4. Perform a paper study to provide the Engineering staff with information on the cost and feasibility of using microfilters to expand the present District secondary treatment capacity. • In June 2001, the Board authorized a sole source agreement with Carollo Engineers for$1,495,000 (plus $80,000 in District laboratory and staffing costs)to design, construct and operate a large microfiltration pilot facility at Plant No. 2 treating primary effluent for ocean discharge. The objective of the microfiltration research (Phase 1) effort was to demonstrate process performance, reliability, and obtain operating cost data for the updated Strategic Plan. • The large pilot scale testing was a success, demonstrating that microfiltration can reliably produce essentially a solids- and bacteria-free effluent at capital and operating costs comparable to traditional treatment technology such as activated sludge. Bench-scale studies were conducted on the microfiltration backwash stream indicating that the solids can be thickened to required levels. It is critical to conduct large scale testing to verify bench-scale performance and validate the capital cost estimates made for full-scale implementation of this technology. G MyAIe�•mBVCAOervN ReM,f3 V. 't Bovp Rpn'Ca RewnaVWZlte 1201A ll,ap[ppsem pgrmyva4en.Mc Paget The District cannot staff this project internally due to the significant number of tasks required to plan, design, construct and operate the microfiltration test facility and the diverse engineering, operational and maintenance expertise that must be brought to bear in a short time-period. Therefore, it is recommended that a consultant with expertise in microfiltration and research protocols perform this work. The project work consists of project plan and design preparation, procurement of additional equipment to treat the backwash and soluble BOD, hiring contractors, supervising construction, 2417 operation and maintenance of the test facilities, sampling and analysis of process streams, ordering chemicals, programming & maintaining instrumentation, forming an expert advisory committee and developing reports. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY The estimated cost for the proposed Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration project is shown below: Proposed turnkey contract for design, construction, and operation of microfiltration test facilityfor ocean discharge $1,555,000 District internal costs including laboratory work $ 100,000 Estimated Cost $1,655,000 There are potential savings in capital and operating costs with microfiltration compared with secondary treatment. In addition there are other benefits of microfiltration over activated sludge treatment including fewer solids being produced, less electricity usage and fewer chemicals. For perspective, a summary of the total costs incurred to date including the proposed cost for Phase II is provided below: Original Microfiltration Research Project including a $250,000 grant from the California Energy Commission $ 300,000 Microfiltration Demonstration Research Project- Phase 1 $1,495,000 District internal costs including laboratory work for Phase 1 $ 80,000 Total Estimated Cost for Phase 11 $1,655,000 Total Project Cost $3,530,000 cwn.ee „e. eoara nax �ooz seam no �rowmoan.m,uarmmnr�wuv.ue,owi:ma� Page 3 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted (Line item: Section _, Page) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The FY 2002-03 Special Projects Research cash flow budget did not include funding for Phase II Microfiltration research. A budget increase of$1,655,000 is being requested for FY2002-03. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Background • Various types of membrane filters are commonly used when treating water for reclamation or human consumption. Membrane filtration in wastewater treatment is becoming increasingly important due to its ability to remove many contaminants to low levels while simplifying the treatment process and reducing the overall costs. • The District, both on its own and in cooperation with the Orange County Water District (OCW D), has investigated membrane filtration since the mid- 1990 as a replacement for various current processing steps. • With the Board's decisions to disinfect our effluent and to achieve 30/30 secondary treatment standards, additional advanced treatment facilities will need to be built at both treatment plants. The Board's decision provides staff with flexibility on how to achieve these objectives, which may include applying technology such as microfiltration, primary effluent filtration, high rate trickling filters and anaerobic liquid treatment processes. • Staff will be developing a schedule within the next 6 months for achieving the 30/30 treatment standards. Previous Work • In 1998, Carollo Engineers approached OCWD with a novel treatment approach for producing high quality reclaimed water from primary effluent. This technology consisted of microfiltration, reverse osmosis and high rate anaerobic digestion. The District tested this technology in 1999-2000 using a small-scale pilot facility operating at Plant No. 1. G.w AWaemaa� Agw nero V= 131a1PI 11 o.,.a hcna Page • The objectives of the project were to determine the technical feasibility of the treatment process to produce high quality reclaimed water, and to determine whether microfiltered primary effluent would produce a product water of high enough quality for continuous discharge to the ocean under more stringent discharge quality requirements (including reduced bacteria levels), either through the existing 120-inch outfall or possibly using the 78-inch ocean outfall. • The project was a success, indicating that microfiltration could remove essentially all of the suspended materials and bacteria from the water. The economic analysis of the technology showed lower capital and operating costs than activated sludge treatment. • In 2001-2002, District staff and Carollo Engineers constructed a large-scale microfilVation demonstration facility at Plant No. 2. The objective of the study was to demonstrate the performance, reliability and cost of microfiltration treatment of primary effluent for ocean discharge. Staff was principally interested in microfiltration as an alternative to bacterial disinfection and activated sludge treatment if the Board decided not to pursue our 301(h) waiver and to eliminate our outfall discharge as a possible source of the bacteria being detected at the beaches. • The results from this Phase I study are consistent with the results from the small-scale test and showed that this treatment approach would have the following advantages compared to full secondary treatment followed by chemical disinfection: - Less energy use - Less solids for disposal (because no secondary treatment is involved) - Lower total costs Phase II Project Scope and Objectives • The project will test the feasibility of treating the microfilter backwash with traditional technology such as sedimentation and floatation thickening and innovative technologies such as anaerobic reactors. In addition, we will be testing pretreatment technologies ahead of the microfilter to remove both suspended and soluble organic materials. The data will be collected to estimate the full-scale costs, design criteria and project impacts. ALTERNATIVES No action; do not pursue microfiltration to prepare primary effluent for ocean discharge. The District might not have a full array of unit process alternatives and then would be forced to rely on more expensive processes such as full secondary treatment using activated sludge followed by ozonation or chlorination/dechlorination of the final effluent. c nw.amw �b�wan=cou�xwi mdeww.r.00n.e 1. lAd) nw n Pages CEQA FINDINGS: This research effort is categorically exempt from CEQA (Section 15306). ATTACHMENT: • Budget Table for Phase II Microfiltration Project EMT/hh/pjm a:ms.auvo�aa�eme naeaa rewv mMAw �V.IZQ.A 11 amnwm .dw Page PHASE II MICROFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Budget Cost Estimate Proposed Test Elements Description of Budget Cost Test Test Test Test .Component Cost $ Element 1 Element 2 Element 3 Element 4 1. Backwash Testing Equipment 130,000 130,000 2. Fuzzy Filter Equipment/ Connection 50,000 50,000 3. Anaerobic Reactor Equipment 210,000 210,000 4. Desktop Study of Activated Slud a/Mlcrofilter Comb. 60,000 60,000 5. Monthly Operating Expenses 300,000 100,000 50,000 150,000 6. Project Management, Data Analysis, Reporting 275,000 140,000 40,000 95,000 7. Design Services 195,000 140,000 55,000 8: Sub-consultant 75,000 25,000 50,000 9. Consumables 60,000 20,000 20,0001 20,000 10. Contingency Allowance 200,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 Sub-total - Consultant Costs $1,555,000 605,000 210,000 680,000 60,000 11. Staff, Labor& Laboratory $ 100,000 Overall Total $1,655,000 Element 1: Evaluation of traditional and innovative backwash treatment alternatives to demonstrate their feasibility and develop accurate capital and O&M costs for backwash treatment. Element 2: Evaluate pretreatment to reduce solids loading on Microfilter that may substantially reduce the size of the installation, and thus capital and 0&M costs. Element 3: Reduce soluble BOD to enable larger portions of flow to be treated by Microfiltration and enable the District to meet the 30/30 treatment standard. Element 4: Engineering paper study to evaluate increasing capacity of existing activated sludge process using Microfiltration rather than installation at traditional secondary clarifiers. Item 12(d).1 TwWay.Aupa 13,2002 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Dare Toed.oroir. 9/4/0 2 9re5102 AGENDA REPORT Irrem Mum item Mumwr 0MrSfQ-56 12fe7 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: Layne T. Baroldi, Senior Regulatory Specialist SUBJECT: Biosolids Recycling Resolution GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Biosolids Management Update—Verbal Report 2. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-18, in Support of Biosolids Recycling, and repealing Resolution No. OCSD 00-05. SUMMARY • With the viability of land application of Class B biosolids in California beyond January 2003 in serious doubt, OCSD must plan ahead to assure that its biosolids continue to be managed in an environmentally sensitive and cost effective manner. • One of the biosolids management options that may be utilized by OCSD in the near future requires a change in Board policy to allow for landfilling of OCSD's biosolids. • A report on the biosolids management options that OCSD plans on utilizing after January 1, 2003 and information on other important biosolids related developments are discussed in the Biosolids Management portion of this Agenda Report. Biosolids Management Update Land application of Class B biosolids in California is supported by the U.S. EPA's 40 CFR Part 503 Biosolids Rule, the California State Water Resource Control Board's General Waste Discharge Requirements (General Order), and a remaining few local ordinances and permits. While a science-based regulatory framework exists, a political environment is not as accepting of Class B biosolids land application. Current Class B Land Application Operations: Presently, OCSD manages its annual production of 196,000 wet tons of biosolids in several locations: G.W AleWWd& WAge ft RepW�9 A900 Repo =Nsm vleb&WIft R"IWA= �W:&a&U ) Page 1 • Tule Ranch on OCSD's land in Kings County at$25.40 per wet ton and $27.35 per wet ton in Kern County(managing -70% of OCSD's biosolids production) • The Yakima Company in Kern County at$33.87 per wet ton (-15%) • Synagro in San Bernardino County and Arizona at $39.50 per wet ton (-15%) Proposed Blosolids Management Options: In anticipation of the Kern County and Kings County Class B biosolids land application bans, it is anticipated that OCSD's biosolids will be managed as follows after January 1, 2003: • Tule Ranch through chemical stabilization and land application as Class A biosolids in Kings County and Kern County at-$35.00 per wet ton (managing -55% of OCSD's biosolids production) • The Yakima Company in La Paz County, Arizona through use of dried biosolids as landfill alternative daily cover and disposal at$35.00 per wet ton (-15%) • Synagro in San Bernardino County and Arizona through Class B land application and composting and land application as Class A biosolids at $39.50 per wet ton (-15%) • California Soil Products through chemical stabilization and land application as Class A biosolids at$32.70 per wet ton. (-15%) For the first time since 1991, staff is proposing to utilize landfilling as one of its biosolids management options. This move to include landfilling is meant to provide additional management flexibility and avoid putting "all of our eggs in one basket." National Academy of Sciences Biosolids Report On July 2, 2002, the National Research Council (NRC)of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) released its long awaited report, Biosolids Applied to Land:Advancing Standards and Practices (Report). This report represents the culmination of 18 months of work by a diverse committee of 16 distinguished scientists, academicians and regulators with varying perspectives on biosolids utilization. • The report's "overarching finding"that "there is no documented scientific evidence that the Part 503 rule has failed to protect public health" further reinforced what many years of operating history at numerous biosolids facilities has shown. • The report also found that there is a need to update the scientific bases of the rule and the report's recommendations to: o use improved risk-assessment methods to better establish standards for chemicals and pathogens, o conduct a new national survey of chemicals and pathogens in sewage sludge O:KWw."an0wd p•m FepvuV W38wa�w�.�.G�.NWaM"ul.l.&naiea XxytlW_aac rt.aw: „mo,an Page 2 o establish a framework for an approach to implement health investigations, and o increase the resources devoted to EPA's biosolids program. Unfortunately, the report provides sound-bites for both sides of the biosolids debate, that when used out of context by biosolids reuse opponents, could further turn the tide against biosolids land application. Riverside County In response to local anti-biosolids activist comments on the National Academy of Science (NAS) biosolids Report, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors directed its Community Health Agency to review the NAS Report and make recommendations on the need for additional biosolids regulations. On August 13, 2003, Riverside County staff recommended: • That the Prohibition of the land application of Class B Sludge remain in effect, and; • The Riverside County Biosolids Ordinance be amended, or an additional Ordinance be developed, to prohibit the land application of bulk (un-bagged) quantities of all Class A material. Riverside County staff chose to emphasize the many"uncertainty" (i.e., need for additional research only, etc.) quotes found in the NAS report as a basis for their recommendation. The staff report goes on to say "while there are a wide variety of processes that can be used to achieve Class A standards, none reduce heavy metals or chemicals; and with regard to the adequacy of the chemical risk analysis, the Report makes no distinction between Class A and Class B sludge. Absent other restrictions, there is a real potential that past or future applications of Class A sludge may include harmful chemicals for which the standards have not been established using current risk analysis standards, or for which standards were never adopted." The Board concurred with Staffs first recommendation to continue the ban on the land application of Class B biosolids but continued for 180 days, a decision on the second recommendation, pending additional review of the NAS report by a yet to be assembled committee. Class B Biosolids Litigation: • Kern County o Trial briefs filed on July 15, 2002 o Reply briefs filed on August 9, 2002 o Judgment in favor of Kern County anticipated o Appeal to 5" District in Fresno G]WAW�Ap Aeow`31101 emm Aw R�11 t2(e),em RK c R : B M", Page 3 • Kings County o Extension of Class B land application to the Board of Supervisors denied o Filed a petition for writ of mandate in the Kings County Superior Court o Kings County preparing administrative record o Kings County's answer pending completion of the administrative record • State Water Resource Control Board General Order EIR o CASA brief filed in response to the appeals brought by two water agencies and Kern County challenging the adequacy of the EIR o Oral argument in the case is expected in the Spring of 2003 Long-tens Biosolids Master Plan OCSD has selected a joint proposal by CH2MHill, CDM, and Tetra Tech to prepare a Long-term Biosolids Master Plan (Plan). The Plan will develop and compare options and develop a strategy for managing OCSD's biosolids for the next five to 15 years. The Plan will also incorporate many existing studies and reports in order to tie together OCSD's solids handling treatment facilities to marketable biosolids products. The final Plan should be completed in 24 weeks after a contract is signed. Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 00-05 • Repeal Resolution No. OCSD 00-05 and adoption of Resolution No. OCSD 02-18 is necessary in order for OCSD to comply with its Environmental Management System for biosolids (EMS). • The EMS is a program developed by the National Biosolids Partnership (NBP)to improve the quality of biosolids management programs nationwide and to promote public acceptance of biosolids use and disposal practices. • The goal of the National Biosolids Partnership (NBP), an alliance formed by the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA), Water Environment Federation (WEF), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is to advance environmentally sound and accepted biosolids management practices. • On July 11th 2000, OCSD signed a Letter of Understanding with the NBP stating that the OCSD would develop an EMS. • The EMS is being utilized by OCSD to document regulatory compliance requirements for the management of biosolids and to gain public confidence and acceptance in its biosolids program. Conformance with the EMS will help OCSD to meet existing regulatory obligations more effectively, address stakeholder concerns, protect the environment, and should lead to greater efficiency and cost reduction in biosolids handling. Our goal is to have a fully functioning EMS for biosolids by the end of 2002, which meets the requirements of the NBP and has been certified through third-party verification. G. . ,ft�Apenls Repwltl3M2 BwrE AQed Fey 1M=em 13(e)Siq lds ReryLl,p.Gx w W:a¢ouz roe) Page 4 A The following language included in Resolution No. OCSD 02-XX will allow OCSD to comply with its EMS if OCSD chooses to utilize landfills as a biosolids management option: "WHEREAS, irrespective of the biosolids management option selected, the District commits to implementing the National Biosolids Partnership's Code of Good Practice as a basis for an Environmental Management System for its biosolids management program" PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. OCSD 02-18 Gk"AO 9 Ma10mtl Ap Rep'4VW]B MAORdRWbbBRNLm,NOI.Bb6iM Rv.Yd^VEoc R".vM:v 2n 1 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT IN SUPPORT OF BIOSOLIDS RECYCLING AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 00.05 WHEREAS, biosolids are the residual product of municipal wastewater processing which have been extensively and properly treated so that they may be safely recycled to amend soil rather than take up limited landfill space; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District ("District') produces biosolids at its two wastewater treatment plants; and WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has adopted detailed and scientifically sound rules regulating the production and use of biosolids [40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 503 (Part 503 Rule)]. These Regulations assure the safe and beneficial use of biosolids when properly managed in accordance with the rules; and WHEREAS, the District supports and implements the biosolids management practices found in the California Water Environmental Association's ("CWEA") Manual of Good Practice for Agricultural Land Application of Biosolids, in order to promote a standard of excellence for applying biosolids to agricultural land, and to assure for the proper oversight of this practice; and WHEREAS, the application of high quality biosolids on nonfood products is safe, provides beneficial nutrients to the soil when applied at agronomic rates, and is consistent with the environmental application of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides on agricultural lands; and WHEREAS, it is the law of the State of California that municipalities divert recyclable materials from disposal in landfills in order to achieve a 50% waste diversion by Year 2000 (Assembly Bill 939); and WHEREAS, in order to maintain the highest quality biosolids for beneficial use, the District maintains a comprehensive Industrial Waste Pretreatment and Source Control Program, which has received the United States Environmental Protection Agency's award for excellence; and GF d�AVnC RepM51 2 rd AB¢' R re�5WWJ —121e1.Bw ft Ra Vdw R . daao2(.1 Page 6 WHEREAS, the District maintains a diverse program of biosolids management, including the application to nontable-food crop agricultural land in Southern California, consistent with the District's mission to protect public health and the environment through excellence in wastewater systems, WHEREAS, irrespective of the biosolids management option selected, the District commits to implementing the National Biosolids Partnership's Code of Good Practice as a basis for an Environmental Management System for its biosolids management program;and WHEREAS, the District desires to promote the continuance of the recycling of biosolids to nontable-food crop agricultural land in a manner that is safe, environmentally beneficial, and is sensitive to the needs of the communities involved. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: The District declares its full support for the recycling of biosolids. Section 2: The District will use on its site, and encourage its Member Agencies to use at their facilities, compost made using District biosolids. Section 3: The District supports the proper management and oversight of this practice in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Part 503 Rule and the CWEA Manual of Good Practice. Section 4: Resolution No. OCSD 00-05 is hereby repealed. Section 5: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on the 25th day of September, 2002. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary 01xv.gMepmMerBovOAgaMe Repvleriggg geaN Rgege R9pumWBINIBm 12(e).9M Ift Rx Ing.dw w+w:vmmx Mnr Page 7 t ,f DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, 5, 2002, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Russell Patterson, Chair Bob Cofer, Director of Operations & Jerry Sigler, Vice Chair Maintenance Mike Alvarez Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Laurann Cook Tod Haynes, Construction Supervisor Alice Jempsa Jim Herberg, Interim Engineering Manager Beth Krom Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Norm Eckenrode Ed Torres, Engineering Manager Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Absent: Larry Porter None Joey Racano Randy Fuhrman (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Larry Porter spoke on treating grease at the source in the various cities and the use of microfiltration. Joey Racano spoke on the benefit of full biological secondary treatment . Randy Fuhnnan asked that he be allowed to address items 63 and 69 on the agenda when they are considered. The Chair granted Mr. Furhman's request. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Russ Patterson did not make a report. PDC Committee Minutes B Page 2 September 5,2002 (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER There was no General Manager's report. (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin did not make a report. (7) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not present. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (9) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-I) a. RECEIVE. FILE, AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the August 1,2002 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached is the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an information only Rem. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There are seven change orders this month for PDC Committee approval. C. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Attached is the PSA and Addenda Report. This is an information only Rem. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There were no PSAs and eight Addenda approved by the General Manager from July 20 through August 22, 2002. d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. PDC Committee Minutes 6 Page 3 September 5, 2002 e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only item. f. PDCO2-56 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, with Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$73,289 and a time extension of 190 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,049,506; and (2)Accept HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No.J-80, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. g. PDCO2-57 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Clarifiers E&G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$8,939, increasing the total contract amount to$825,035; and (2)Accept Clarifiers E & G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No.2, Job No. 132-85-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. h. PDCO2-58 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget amendment of$500,000 for Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-39, for a total budget of$15,154,000; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$133,734 and a time extension of 45 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $10,916,329. I. PDCO2-59 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements, Job No. SP2001-21, with MMC, Inc., authorizing an addition of$21,020 and a time extension of 58 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$214,121; and (2)Accept Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements, Job No. SP2001-21, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. j. PDCO2-60 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2000.59, with Punchlist Contractors, authorizing an addition of$51,364, increasing the total contract amount to$159,764, and a time extension of 131 calendar days. k. PDCO2.61 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 1 to Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job No. J-71-7, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$91,069, increasing the contract amount to $1,254,569. PDC Committee Minutes 9 Page 4 September 5,2002 I. PDCO2-62 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1) Approve a budget amendment of$48,792 for Ocean Ouffall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No.2,Job No.J-66, for a total budget of$2,031,073; and (2) Ratify Change Ober No.4 to Ocean Ouffall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No.2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of$48,792,and a time extension of 21 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,411,073. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carded to approve the recommended actions for hems specified as 9(a) through 9(I)under Consent Calendar. (10) INFORMATION ITEMS(Items a-b) a. PDCO2-63 Phase II Microfiltration Demonstration Project as Alternative Technology to Achieve Secondary Treatment Standards for Ocean Discharge. Information Only Item. Randy Fuhrnan asked that the directors think about reclamation which in his opinion is more important than microfiltration. The laws require secondary treatment before using it for reclaimed water. Water treated by microfiltration will not meet secondary treatment standards. Bob Ooten explained that this project is a continuation project that has been ongoing for 2-3 years. The results look very promising when compared to conventional activated sludge treatment. There Is a need to evaluate some things that were not done during earlier studies. Ed Torres made a presentation on the demonstration project, which is a joint effort between the Orange County Water District, the Sanitation District and Carollo Engineers. Data from Phase II is expected to be similar to the pilot project results. He described the economic and environment benefits. Phase II is expected to answer questions on costs to treat backwash water, further optimize process to reduce capital and O&M costs, evaluate pretreatment of BOD to enable larger flows to meet 30:30 treatment standards, and evaluate the ability of microfiltration to expand capacity. Total cost of Phase II is about$1.655 million. The OMTS Committee approved the project at its last meeting. The results of the project will be a determining factor in the overall planning to reach 30:30. The District will own the equipment and it may be possible to use it for additional treatment for the GW RS water. b. PDCO2-64 PCH Force Main Failures. Information Only Item. Tod Haynes briefed the directors on the PCH Force Main System and explained the recent problems. Staff and General Counsel are looking into whether there is any recourse from the manufacturer of the defective pipe. Staff is contacting other agencies to see if they have experienced similar problems. Another project is being considered that would decommission the three existing force mains and install a new force main in Pacific Coast Highway. A cost analysis is being done. The committee will continue to get updates as information is received and evaluated. PDC Committee Minutes r Page 5 September 5, 2002 (11) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-e) a. PDCO2-65 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 1-10,for an amount not to exceed $3,186,027. Jim Herberg briefed the directors on this project, which will increase the capacity of the station to equalize the flow between the two treatment plants. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pimie, Inc.to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 1-10,for an amount not to exceed$3,186,027. b. PDG02-66 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a budget amendment of $523,000 to Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, for a total project budget of$969,000, to be reimbursed by Boyle Engineering. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a budget amendment of$523,000 to Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, for a total project budget of$969,000, to be reimbursed by Boyle Engineering. C. PDCO2-67 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to negotiate Addendum No. 3 with Fluor Signature Services for Phase III of the Space Allocation and Interior Renovation, Job No.J-84, providing for a detailed engineering design and preparation of plans and specifications. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Table consideration of this item until the November PDC Committee meeting in order to address the concerns of the directors, including what problems are being resolved, a cost breakdown, and how the estimated cost could be reduced. d. PDCO2-68 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No.t to the Professional Services Agreement with CH21A Hill, Inc.for additional engineering services for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6, for an additional amount of$199,123, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $333,981. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for additional engineering PDC Committee Minutes r Page 6 September 5, 2002 services for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6, for an additional amount of$199,123, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to$333,981. e. PDCO2-69 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Approve a budget amendment of$100,913 for Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, for a total project budget of$572,913; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for engineering services for the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, for an amount not to exceed$490,913. Randy Fuhrman addressed the directors asking that they demand that staff present all the alternatives, including disposal in landfills. He recommended obtaining cost-sharing agreements with other agencies or organizations and to consider partnerships on some of the disposal options. Jim Herberg said that the additional requested funds are for evaluating new technologies and opportunities for reuse. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors (1)Approve a budget amendment of$100,913 for Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, for a total project budget of$572,913; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for engineering services for the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No.J-40-7, for an amount not to exceed $490,913. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. PDC Committee Minutes r Page 7 September 5, 2002 (16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:17 p.m. Submitted by: �� ,HIV-/ Je" appan PDE,Committee Secretary a:wro.maromvwx�zaozaumn«oeosoz 0u PW Mm .a PDC COMMITTEE NeeDng Date To ad.ofDi- 09iDsio2 09/25/02 AGENDA REPORT I1emNumber ItmNumber PDCD2-56 13(d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. John Falkenstein, Project Manager SUBJECT: HVAC EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-80 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, with Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$73,289 and a time extension of 190 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,049,506; and (2)Accept HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-80, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY • This project installs new HVAC equipment, replaces older equipment, and installs gas heaters and exhaust fans throughout various locations at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. It will also link the control of all higher capacity fans to the existing fire alarm system. • Tran Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc. on Feb. 28, 2001. • Change Order No. 3 includes one item of added work and a time extension of 190 calendar days to Job No. J-80. Liquidated damages on this contract are $200 per day and there are no bonus provisions. • Staff recommends the award of a Purchase Order to Power& Compression Systems, LLP for an amount not to exceed $1,499,455. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date May 1, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date October 22, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3 Current Contract Completion Date June 7, 2002 Actual Completion Date June 7, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Liquidated Damages Assessment N/A •....a:vmai Page 1 r� Change Order No. 2 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Remove and Replace Infrared $73,289. 0 Error Heaters in Sho s "A" and "B" 2 Time Extension 0. 190 Desi n Ch . Total —Change Order No. 3 $73,289. 190 Item 1 resulted from a design error. The District will seek reimbursement from the designer for the costs resulting from rework. Item 2 provides for a 190- calendar day, non compensable time extension for Item 6 in Change Order No. 2. That Change Order was negotiated for$56,776 with an agreement to negotiate a time extension to be included in a future Change Order. The Contractor has agreed not to file a claim for extended overhead for this and any future time extension. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 897,339.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 78,878.00 This Change $ 73,289.00 Change Orders to Date $ 152, 167.00 Percentage Increase to Date 16.96% Final Contract Price $1,049,506.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This Rem has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 95) ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This Rem has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information Rem) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None ,:„�, Page 2 1 CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt from CEQA requirements. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order JBF:Ic CAD menLs and SeldngsXge\Local SeWngs\Temporary InI mM ReMOLK08FW2.56-J-80-0905021.dm Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE HVAC EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 JOB NO. J-80 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ 2,000 $ 2000, $ 2,000 $ 2,000 100% Stud ies/Permittin $ - $ - E $ Design Staff $ 6,600 $ 42,600 $ - $ 42,600 $ 42,600 $ - S 42,600 $ 42,600 100% Consultant PSA $ 40,400 S 40,400 $ - $ 40,400 $ 40400 $ - $ 40,400 $ 40,400 100% Construction Contract $ 565,000 $ 976,217 $ 73,289 $ 1,049,506 $ 976,217 E 73,289 S 1,049.506 $ 974.137 93% Construction Administration $ 14,000 $ 74,000 $ - $ 74,000 $ 74,000 $ - $ 74,000 $ 45,074 61% Construction Inspection $ 16,000 $ 89,000 $ - $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ - $ 89,000 $ 55,070 62% Contingency Cont.ngency $ 113,000 $ 91,783 $ 73,289 $ 18,494 $ $ - Is 73,289 80% PROJECT TOTAL S 757.000 1 $ 1,316,000 1 $ - $ 1,316,000 $ 1224,217 $ 73,289 S 1.297,506 $ 1.232,570 95% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 757,000 1 $ 1.316,000 $ - $ 1,316.000 1 1 $ 1.224,217 $ 73,289 $ 1,297.506 S 1.232,570 1 95% CITEMP%[Budaot Table CW3 elslDistrids CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Job No. J-SO APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE( (DAYS( (DAYS( CONTRACT 511/01 $ 897,339.00 $ 897.339.00 0.00% 180 180 CO NO. 1' 1/11/02 $ 21,102.00 $ 918,441.00 2.35% 33 213 CO NO. 2" 5/2/02 $ 57,776.00 $ 976.217.00 1 8.79% 1 0 1 213 n -Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board RewMiob 99-73 "Approved by PDC Committee Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10944 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA -92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Adams/Mallory Construction Comoanv. Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) _ Date: September 25, 2002 Job: HVAC Equipment Reolacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Job No. J-80 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Bedust) $73,289.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —REPLACEMENT OF INFRARED HEATERS IN SHOPS A AND B The Contractor was directed to remove one new infrared ceiling heater in Shop "A" and 22 new infrared ceiling heaters in Shop"B' and replace with 10 new wall mounted fan heaters. The work included furnishing labor and materials to install a new Trane GPND012AAF wall heater in Shop "A"and 9 new Trans GPNDDI2AAF wall heaters in Shop "B", fabricate and install 10 new heater wall brackets, relocate gas and electrical lines, and install new gas flues and roof caps for the heaters. The 23 infrared ceiling heaters installed under this contract interfered with operation of the existing traveling cranes. When the cranes were parked directly under the heaters, insulation on the crane bus bars became overheated, softened and warped, resulting in the cranes becoming inoperable. This change order item resulted from a design error and the District will seek reimbursement from the designer for the rework. This work was not included in the original contract and was accomplished on a time and materials basis pursuant to Section 47 B. 2) b) of Division 01, General Requirements. (Reference FCO No. 10) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $73,289.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION FOR PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDER The Contractor is granted a 190-calendar day time extension for Item No. 6 of Contract Change Order No. 2 which directed the Contractor to furnish and install a pump control panel for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (COBS) chilled water system at Plant No. 2. This time extension included research, redesign, preparation of 6 new drawings, purchase of equipment and scheduled installation of the control panel. The pump control panel was not included in the original contract. The Contractor agreed to waive any overhead charges for this time extension. This time extension was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: Contract schedule update dated April 30, 2002) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 190 Calendar Days TOTAL COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $73,289.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 190 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX $127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Adams/Mallory Construction Company, Inc. C.O. No: Three (3) _ Dale: September 25, 2002 Job: HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Job No. J-80 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 190-day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: May 1, 2001 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 27, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 190 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 223 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 403 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: June 7, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: June 7, 2002 Original Contract Price $ 897,339.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 78,878.00 This Change (Add) (Bedust) $ 73,289.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,049,506.00 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Adams/Mallon Construction Company, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) _ Date: September 25, 2002 Job: HVAC Eguipment Replacement at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Job No. J-80 Board Authorization Date: September 25, 2002 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: John D. Linder Construction Manager Date Approved by: David Ludwin Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: ADAMSIMALLORY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC Contractor Dale r PDC COMMITTEE m%og Date Tu6A.MDir. 09105,02 09/251 2 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDM2-57 13(d) Orange County sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Kathy Miles, Engineer SUBJECT: CLARIFIERS E & G REHABILITATION PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-85-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Clarifiers E & G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$8,939, increasing the total contract amount to $825,035; and (2) Accept Clarifiers E & G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • Job No. P2-85-1 provided for the demolition and replacement of the outer walls of Clarifiers E & G at Plant No. 2. The replacement was necessary due to severe corrosion of the structural concrete on the outer walls. The corrosion was accelerated by cracks in the walls of these 40 year old clarifiers. • RMS Engineering prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction, Inc. on August 6, 2001. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date August 6, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date January 12, 2002 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 2 Current Contract Completion Date July 18, 2002 Actual Completion Date July 18, 2002 Days Subjected to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 Change Order No. 2 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Redrill and Replace Aluminum $3,984 0 Omission Angles on Clarifier E 2 Repair of Coating on Clarifier E $4,955 0 Changed Condition Total Change Order No. 2 $8,939 0 w ,C Job Completion e This contract is now 100% complete. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 786,600.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 29,496.00 This Change (Add)(Dedust) $ 8,939.00 Change Orders to Date $ 38,435.00 Percentage Increase to Date 4.89% Amended Contract Price $ 825,035.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Approved directly by Board on 4/25/01) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information Rem) Staff requests a reallocation of funds for Construction Administration and this change order. Construction Inspection has been reduced and reallocated to Construction Administration, and Contingency has been reduced and reallocated to the Construction Contract. See attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS The project is exempt from CEQA under Section 15302. A Notice of Exemption was filed on May 21, 2001. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order KM:dm G:wglobaPAgenda Draft Repo %PDCIAR P245-1 CO#2 and COA 092502AM Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Clarifiers E & G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2 JOB NO. P2-85-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT7TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) Project Development $ 5,000 S 2000, $ 2000, $ 2.000 $ 2.000 $ 2,000 100% Studies/Perrattin $ - $ $ $ $ - g 0% Consultant PSA $ 30,000 $ 47,000 1 $ 47,000 $ 43.447 $ 43,447 $ 37,000 85% Design Staff $ 15,OD0 $ 36.000 $ 36,000 $ 36.000 $ 36,000 $ 27,000 75% Construction Contract $ 500,000 $ 816,096 $ 8.939 $ 825,035 $ 816,096 $ 8939 $ 825.D35 $ 734.486 89% Construction Administration $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 20,D00 $ 45,000 $ 25,000 $ 20.000 $ 45.000 $ 43,000 96% Construction Inspection $ 50.000 $ 50.000 $ 20.000 $ 30,000 $ 50.000 $ 20,0D0 $ 30.000 $ 14,000 47% Contingency S 100.000 $ 115,504 $ 8939 S 106.565 g $ - $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 725,000 $ 1,091.600 $ - $ 1.091,600 $ 972,543 $ 8,939 $ 981482 S 857486 87% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 725,000 1 $ 1,091.600 1 $ - $ 1,091,600 $ 972,543 S 6,939 1 $ 981,482 1 S 857,486 67% EOMS 003735012 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Clarifiers E & G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-85-1 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 8/6/2001 $786.600 $786.600 0.00 120 120 CO NO. 1' 6/27/2002 $29.496 $816,096 3.75% 187 307 CO NO. 2 Pending 1 $8,939 $826,035 4.89% 0 307 'Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 EDMS. 003738011 Page 1 of 3 L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Two 2 _ Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Clarifiers E & G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-85-1 Consultant: RMS Engineering & Design. Inc. Amount of this Change Order(Add)(DeduGt)$8,939.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - REDRILL AND REPLACE ALUMINUM ANGLES ON CLARIFIER "E" This item is for labor, material, and equipment to redrill and replace the aluminum support angles that attach from the inner wall to the outer wall to support the aluminum covers on Clarifier"E". The aluminum covers and support angles had to be removed to construct the new outer wall sections on Clarifier"E." While the new outer wall will be constructed as a true circle,the existing outer wall was not. Therefore, some of the existing support angles do not fit properly on the new outer wall. Those supports that did not fit were redrilled to make a proper fit with the new outer wall. Also, some of the support angles and bolts were corroded and had to be replaced. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 6 and Margate Letter dated July 12, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,984.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—REPAIR OF COATING ON CLARIFIER"E" This item is for labor, material, and equipment to repair the coating on Clarifier "E." This repair consists of cutting the existing urethane coating at the effluent channel inside wall/floor transition, sweep abrasive blasting at the cut, and installing a bead of sealant to seal the existing coating. Upon inspection of the existing coating, the coating on the inner wall was still adhering properly while the coating on the channel floor was not. The coating on the channel floor was not adhering property and water was coming under the coating layer and beginning to compromise the coating on the inner wall. It was determined to remove the coating on the channel floor due to the fad that corrosive gasses are not present when flow is in the channel. Sealant was placed at the cut point to ensure the coating on the inner wall would remain attached. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 7 and Margate Letter dated June 14, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,955.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 8,939.OD Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Two 2 _ Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Clarifiers E & G Rehabilitation Project at Plant No 2 Job No P2-85-1 Consultant: RMS Engineering & Design. Inc. TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by the Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 6, 2001 Original Contract Time: 160 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: January 12, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 187 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 347 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 18. 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: July 18, 2002 Original Contract Price $ 786,600.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 29,496.00 This Change (Add)(Deduct) $ 8,939.00 Amended Contract Price $ 825 035.00 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Clarifiers E& G Rehabilitation Proiect at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-85-1 Consultant: RMS Engineering & Design. Inc. Board Authorization Date: September 25, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, Engineering & Construction Manager Date Approved by: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Margate Construction, Inc. Contractor Date EDNISr 003738013 PDC COMMITTEE Mee"Date TOBd.ofol)m 09(Dsi02 o9nsio2 AGENDA REPORT Ran Number Ran Number PDC@-u 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J. K, L, M. N, AND O AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-39 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve a budget amendment of$500,000 for Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, for a total budget of $15,154,000; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$133,734 and a time extension of 45 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $10,916,329. SUMMARY Background • Job No. 132-39, Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, includes the cleaning of accumulated grit from the digesters, installing a flow mixing system to increase digester efficiency and reduce grit accumulation, insulating four of the digester domes to reduce heat loss, adding an interior plastic liner on the digester domes, and upgrading the digester control systems. • Lee and Ro and Spec Services prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction on August 25, 1999. • Item No. 1 includes work to replace pipes and supports and repair access doors inside Digesters I and J. Since the replaced items are inside Digesters I and J, their condition was not known during the design phase. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date October 26, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date October 24, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 11 Current Contract Completion Date August 14,2002 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Page 1 Change Order No. 11 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Remove and Replace/Repair Pipes, $74,447 0 Changed Supports, Access Doors, and Seal Conditions Cracks at Digesters I and J 2 Mixing Valves and Actuators $29,700 45 Design Modifications Change 3 Additional Supports to Valve $2,576 0 Omission Actuators 4 1 Revise PLC 1/0 Abbreviations and $27,011 0 Design Additional Graphics I I Change Total Change Order No. 11 1 $133 734 45 Job Completion • This contract is now 95% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 1,134,995.00 This Change (Add) (DBduet) $ 133,734.00 Change Orders to Date $ 1,268,729.00 Percentage Increase to Date 13.15% Amended Contract Price $10,916,329.00 Note: Change Order No. 2 in the amount of$552,000 included hauling and land application of dried biosolids obtained during the digester cleaning process not included in this contract. Change Order No. 2 resulted in cost savings of $111,180 to the District. The total change order percentage including Change Order No. 11 would be 7.43% without Change Order No. 2. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section a-Page 80) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff requests a budget amendment of$500,000. The additional funds requested for this project provide for staff labor required to complete the extended project. The staff labor includes support from other departments such Page 2 v as Information Technology and Operations & Maintenance. The previous budget included these funds, however, the budget was reduced during the current fiscal year. The funds need to be reinstated from District reserves. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA and District's guidelines, Section 15301 (B). The Notice of exemption was filed with the County Clerk on March 17, 1998. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order UM:dm WntoobaMgenda Draft RepatsWDCWR P2.39 CO#11 092502.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I,J,K,L,M,N, AND O AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development Studies/Permitting Consultant PSA $ 1,045,000 $ - $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 879,810 1 $ 879.810 $ 850.000 97% Design Staff $ 130,000 $ 844,000 $ 844,000 $ 844,000 $ 844,000 $ 844,000 700% Construction Contract $ 9,875.000 $11,023,000 $ - $ 11.023,000 $ 10,782.595 $ 133.734 $ 10,916.329 $ 10,782.595 99% Construction(other) $ 1.907,000- $ (900.000 $ 1,007.000 $ 446.000 $ 446,000 $ 435,000 98% Construction Staff $ 50.000 $ 775.000 $ 605.000 $ 1,380,000 $ 1,380,000 $ 1,380.000 $ 1.213,456 88% Contingency $ 105,000 $ (105,0D0) $ $ PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 11,100,000 $ 14.654,000 $ 500,000 $15,154.000 $ 14,332,405 $ 133.734 $ 14,466,139 $ 14,125.051 98% Reimbufsable Costs PROJECTNET $ 11.100,000 $14454.000 $16.154.000 $ 14.332.405 $ 133.734 $ 14466.139 $ 14,125,051 98% EDMS 0003738162 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND O AT PLANT 2 JOB NO. P2-39 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 8/25199 $ 9.647,600 $ 9.647,600 730 730 CO NO. 1' 3/28/00 $ (142,344) $ 9,505.256 -1.48% 72 802 CO NO. 2 4/26/00 $ 552,000 $ 10.057,266 4.25% 0 802 CO NO. 3' 7/6/00 $ (70.815) $ 9.986.441 3,51% 0 802 CO NO. 4 7/19/00 $ 91.834 $ 10,078,275 4.46% 56 858 CO NO. 5 10/25/00 $ 196,994 $ 10,275,269 6.51% 28 886 CO NO.6 1220/00 $ 52,782 $ 10,328,051 7.05% 0 886 CO NO. 7 228/01 $ 221,581 $ 10,549,632 9.35% 30 916 CO NO. 8"1 5N7/01 $ 54,073 $ 10.603,705 9.91% 0 916 CO NO, 9" 9/6I01 $ 71,863 $ 10.675,668 10.66% 0 916 CO NO. 10 626IO2 $ 107,027 $ 10,782,595 11.76% 83 979 'Approval by DM lam,delegated authm0y,by Board Resolution 99-23- PDC Approval EDMS#003736163 c Y Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. Amount of this Change Order(Add) (DeAust) $133,734.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract andlor contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — REMOVE AND REPLACE/REPAIR PIPES, SUPPORTS, ACCESS DOORS, AND SEAL CRACKS AT DIGESTERS I AND J This item is for labor, material, and equipment to perform the following work at Digesters I and J: A. Remove and replace deteriorated concrete supports (two in each digester) and two bottom sludge pipes (one in each digester) inside Digesters I and J. Cost of this change is$24,947.00. B. Remove four sample pipes (two in each digester), 6-inch diameter, 20 feet long. Cost of this change is $2,000.00. C. Repair, sandblast and epoxy coat four access doors and frames (two in each digester) and replace 6-inch spools to the access doors. Cost of this change is $12,000.00. D. Repair cracks on digester domes and pump room slab. Cost of this change is $2,500.00. E. Remove and replace deteriorated concrete to install handrails on digester domes. Cost of this change is $3,000.00. F. Repair, weld, sandblast and epoxy coat eight 12-inch nozzles (four in each digester)and two 18-inch recirculation pipes (one in each digester). Cost of this change is $27,000.00. G. Remove and replace 1-inch PVC plant waterline, 200 feet long with galvanized pipe. Cost of this change is$3,000.00. The above mentioned work was necessary because the concrete supports, spools, bottom sludge pipes, access doors, water lines were corroded and had to be replaced or refurbished and was not known during the design phase. All work inside Digesters I and J was performed as permit required confined spaces. This work was not included in the contract documents and was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 43 and Margate Letter Dated June 20, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $74,447.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven(11) Date: September 25, 2D02 - Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I J, K, L, M, N and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. ITEM 2—MIXING VALVES AND ACTUATORS MODIFICATIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment to modify two 14-inch mixing valves and actuators inside Digesters I and J pump rooms. The designed mixing valves and actuators, if installed, required piping modifications and would cause congestion in the pump rooms. Therefore the mixing valves and actuators were redesigned (from a spring return type to an air return type)to reduce congestion and provide adequate access to operations and maintenance staff. The actual size of the valves and actuators were not known during the design phase. At the time of writing this change order, the Contractor was negotiating with the manufacturer for credits associated with returning the designed valves and actuators. The credit for this item will be included in a future change order. A 45-day time extension was necessary to redesign the valves, complete the procurement process, install and test the two valves. This change Rem was on the critical path of the work schedule and hence delayed the startup of Digesters I and J. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 45 and Margate's Letter Dated March 6, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $29,700.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 45 Calendar Days ITEM 3—ADDITIONAL SUPPORTS TO VALVE ACTUATORS This item is for labor, material, and equipment to provide additional supports to ten valve actuators at Digesters I and J. Work included adding galvanized rods and unistruts to support the valve actuators. These additional supports were added based on the structural engineer's recommendations. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 45 and Margate's Letter Dated March 7, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,576.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K. L, M. N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. ITEM 4 — REVISE PLC 1/0 ABBREVIATIONS AND ADDITIONAL GRAPHICS This Rem is for the following additional work: A. Revise PLC input/output abbreviations associated with Digester L and M remote drops to conform to current District's adopted abbreviation standards. These revisions were necessary because the District's abbreviation standards were adopted after the design of this project was complete. Cost of this change is $7,911.00. B. Provide 28 additional graphic screens. The contract documents required the Contractor to create 50 graphic screens for this project. During the programming phase of this project, it was discovered that additional graphic screens were necessary for proper operation of the digesters and documenting process flows. Work for this item included creating additional graphic screens, bench testing the graphics along with the program codes, and field testing the graphics. Cost of this change is $19,100.00. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 37, District's Letter Dated May 13, 2002, and Margate's Letters Dated April 15, 2002 and June 12, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $27,011.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $133,734,00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 45 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven 11 Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 45-day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 26, 1999 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 24, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 45 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 294 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 1024 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 14, 2002 Projected Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Prev . Authorized Changes $ 1,134,995.00 This Change (Add) (Aedust) $ 133,734.00 Amended Contract Price $10,916,329.00 ( Page 5 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927284127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. Board Authorization Date: September 25, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: John Linder, Construction & Engineering Manager Date Approved by: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Margate Construction, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS#0 0 37 3 81 64 PDC COMMITTEE r n9 roed.OT- 09/Os/02 09/25/02 AGENDA REPORT `ternNumbl It=Nuinber PD 02-59 13(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Sid Kirk, Project Manager - SUBJECT: MAIN STREET PUMP STATION VENTILATION IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. SP2001-21 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements, Job No. SP2001-21, with MMC, Inc., authorizing an addition of$21,020, and a time extension of 58 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $214,121; and (2)Accept Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements, Job No. SP2001-21, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • Job No. SP2001-21, Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements brought the existing ventilation system in compliance with NFPA (National Fire Protection Act) 820. • R.W. Beck prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to MMC, Inc. on September 6, 2001. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date December 26, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date March 25, 2002 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date May 22, 2002 Actual Completion Date May 22, 2002 Days Subjected to Liquidated Damages N/A Liquidated Damages Assessment N/A i Change Order No. 1 Content ' Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Correct Duct Section Thru Floor $ 8,591 21 Omission 2 Replace Electrical Receptacles $ 407 0 Omission 3 Modify Catwalk Handrail $ 1,045 4 Omission 4 Provide Temp. Ventilation $10,977 33 Design Change Total Change Order No. 1 $21,020 58 Job Completion This contract is now 100% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 193,101.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Dedust $ 21,020.00 Change Orders to Date $ 21,020.00 Percentage Increase to Date 10.88% Amended Contract Price $ 214,121.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The budget table was revised to move contingency to the construction contract for this change order and to reallocate funds from inspection to administration. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None Rely �0A1 Page 2 1 CEGA FINDINGS The project is categorically exempt. A Notice of Exemption was filed on November 2, 2000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order SKID G:1n1&baMgenda Draft RepM XPDCWR SP2001-21 CO#1 and CAA 092502.dw ae�sm: nao+ Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION VENTILATION IMPEOVEMENTS Job No. SP2001-21 Ew'3 3 _ s=Xc i r : z s - w w Psi _ Y( ✓x Al .a�v '✓a I��¢°� CXnz � f, -5-i �PRc�a 1:f}TASK at1THORtzE� PROJECT 9UOGET �REUI3Ep � FT.Eii AE1TNOi�(ZaTlpTil � -'f i` � P R t P R O� z rc _ 9UDGEx UOGET - INCREASE_ s� subOET%y,. Project Development $ 2,200 $ 2,200 $ 2,200 ": $ 2,200 $ 2,200 $ 1,760 80% Studies/Permitting - $ $ Consultant PSA $ 31,000 $ 31.000 Is 31.000 $ 31.000 $ 31.000 1 $ 19.223 62% Design Staff $ 16.750 $ 16,750 $ 16,750 `' $ 16,750 $ 16,750 $ 12,768 76% Construction Contract $ 175,000 $ 193,101 $ 21,020 $ 214,121 $ 193,101 $ 21,020 $ 214,121 $ 214,121 100% Construction Adm. $ 10,400 $ 19,900 $ 10,000 $ 29,900 '; $ 19,900 $ 10.000 $ 29,900 $ 27,362 92% Construction Insp. $ 20,750 $ 39,750 $ 10,000 $ 29,750 $ 39,750 U,wUj 29,750 8 12,221 41% Contingent $ 34,000 $ 21,399 $ 21,020 $ 379 $ PROJECTTOTAL $ 290,100 $ 324,100 $ - $ 324.100 $ 302,701 $ 21,020 1 $ 323.721 $ 287,455 H89% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 290,100 $ 324,100 $ - $ 324,100 .?, $ 302,701 $ 21,020 $ 323,721 $ 287,455 1 89% EDMS 0083Tl7288 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Main Street Pump Station Ventilation Improvements Job No. SP2001-21 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 12/26/01 $ 193,101.00 $ 193,101.00 0.00% 90 90 Co=I�O,'1a ',Prentling �161 U20r) GS 1� �0 - D s A-xd.,.-, ,td . - " ""NAM, Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER _ Contractor. MMC. INC. C.O. No.: One 1 _ Date: September S. 2002 Job: Ventilation Improvements of the Main Street Pumpina Station, Job No. SP2001-21 Consultant: R. W. Beck Amount of this Change Order(Add) $21,020.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1- PROVIDE DUCT SECTIONS THROUGH MOTOR ROOM FLOOR This item is for the modification to fiberglass duct work routed through the electrical room Floor and around existing floor beams. The dimensions specified were too large to allow the ductwork to pass through the existing opening. The existing floor beams were not disclosed in the contract documents. The costs associated with this Change Order Item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48(B) 1 of the General Requirements. (Reference SP2001-21 FCO-1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8.591.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 21 Calendar Days ITEM 2- REPLACE ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES The Contractor was directed to provide explosion proof receptacles and matching plugs in lieu of explosion proof junction boxes for the two sump pumps. The plans directed the Contractor to hard wire the sump pumps to the new junction boxes, but the sump pumps would not work property if connected in this manner. The costs associated with this Change Order Item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48(B) 1 of the General Requirements. (Reference SP2001-21 FCO-3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $407.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3- MODIFY CATWALK HANDRAIL FOR NEW DUCT LOCATION The plans did not show the mezzanine catwalk and handrail location. During ventilation duct installation, the handrail had to be removed and then reconfigured to reinstall for the catwalk. The costs associated with this Change Order Item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48(B) 1 of the General Requirements. (Reference SP2001-21 FCO-5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1.045.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: MMC. INC. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: September 5. 2002 Job: Ventilation Improvements of the Main Street Pumping Station, Job No. SP2001.21 Consultant: R. W. Beck ITEM 4- TEMPORARY UPGRADE OF SUPPLY FANS FOR VENTILATION OF PUMP STATION This item is for additional temporary air supply fans required when the permanent fans were taken out of service for replacement under this contract. The contract specified a Flow rate of 6000 scfm for the temporary fans. However, the fans were unable to sufficiently ventilate the station. Two additional temporary fans were required. Also, during this period, the Contractor was delayed due to pump Maintenance by OCSD. The costs associated with this Change Order Item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48(B) 1 of the General Requirements. (Reference SP2001-21 FCO-4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,977.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 33 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $21,020.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 58 Calendar Days Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER - Contractor. MMC. INC. C.O. No.: One 1 _ Date: September 5. 2002 Job: Ventilation Improvements of the Main Street Pumping Station, Job No. SP2001-21 Consultant: R. W. Beck The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 58 calendar day time extension is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by the Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Dale: December 26, 2001 Original Contract Time: 90 Days Original Completion Date: March 25, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 58 Days Total Contract Time Extension: 58 Days Revised Contract Time: 148 Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: May 22. 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $193,101.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Beduet) $ 21,020.00 Amended Contract Price $214,121.00 u Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. MMC. INC. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: September 5. 2002 Job: Ventilation Improvements of the Main Street Pumping Station, Job No. SP2001-21 Consultant: R. W. Beck Board Authorization Date: September 25, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, Engineering/Construction Manager Date Approved by: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: MMC, INC. Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ad.of M, 09/05/02 09/25/02 AGENDA REPORT Rem Nwnb RM Numner PDCO2fi0 13(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Bud Palmquist, Project Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASING CONFERENCE ROOM AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. SP 2000-59 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2000-59, with Punchlist Contractors, authorizing an addition of$51,364, increasing the total contract amount to $159,764, and a time extension of 131 calendar days. SUMMARY Background . This job is for the construction of a new Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1, which includes a new structure immediately adjacent to the existing Warehouse Facility and existing Purchasing Building. This project will provide Purchasing and Warehouse staff an area to hold conferences with outside vendors, and conduct bid openings. The new structure will also provide Warehouse and purchasing staff a place to conduct in-house meetings and hold training sessions. . Tran Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to Punchlist Contractors on June 27, 2001. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date October 25, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date February 21, 2002 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date July 2, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 38 Days Liquidated Damages Assessment N/A Change Order No. 1 Content ' Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Miscellaneous Design Changes $ 10.092 34 Design Change 2 Miscellaneous Improvements $ 6,322 27 Omission 3 Inspection of Existing Cast Iron Sewer $ 575 2 Changed Pie Condition 4 Additional Foundation Work $ 6,350 28 Changed Condition 5 Modification of Handicap Ramp and $ 28,025 37 Other Railing 6 Time Extensions $ 0 3 Other Total —Change Order No. 1 $ 51,364 1 131 PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Prize $ 108.400.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change Order(CO No. 1, Add) $ 51,364.00 Change Orders to Date $ 51,364.00 Percent Increase to Date 47.38% Amended Contract Price $ 159,764.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (FY2002-03 Budget, Line Item: Section 8— Page 138) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This project is funded under Miscellaneous & Support Projects which provides for all small projects at Plant No. 1. Additional budget is required to provide funds for this construction contract change order and additional staff costs. Items 1 through 5 required significant additional administration and engineering staff costs to implement the changes. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None GM dbNWndaN dAOenf Rega 2Rm(d AWe RepM Vtem lJ 9)SPY 59dx Rem a UMI Page 2 w ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This Project is not included in a previously approved Master Plan/EIR. Project is exempt per CEOA Guideline, Section 15302 for Facilities Engineering Projects at Plant No. 1. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 1 BP:lc GYq.NabpmticlBmd/geMe flepvb13W1 BovE eyvNa Fpwu`09p11Mn 13�OIGPNOY59-0x eemee:v 1 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1 Job No. SP2000-59 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Prolecl Development $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 512 $ 512 $ 512 100% Studies/Permitting $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 958 $ 958 $ 958 100% Consultant PSA $ 7.500 $ 27.000 $ 27,000 $ 27.000 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 100% Design Staff $ 4.000 $ 20,0D0 $ 13.328 $ 33,328 $ 20,000 $ 13.328 $ 33,328 $ 33.328 100% Construction Contract $ 50,000 $ 110,000 $ 51,364 $ 161,364 $ 108,400 $ 51.364 $ 159,764 $ 107,357 67% Construction Administration $ 2.000 $ 6,000 $ 40,069 $ 46,069 $ 6,000 $ 40.069 $ 46,069 $ 46,069 100% Construction Inspection $ 2,000 $ 8,000 $ 44,796 $ 50,796 $ 6,000 $ 44,796 $ 50,798 $ 50,798 100% Contingency $ 9.000 $ (9,000) $ $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 65,500 $ 180.000 $ 140,557 $ 320.557 $ 168,870 $ 149,557 $ 318,427 $ 266,020 84% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET ' It 65.500 1 $ 180.000 1 $ 140,557 $ 320.557 1 $ 168.870 $ 149.557 $ 318,427 1 $ 266,020 1 847/ C.Aftm11$P2000.59 Budget Table,xblDisinde CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT PURCHASING CONFERENCE ROOM AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. SP2000-59 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 10/25/01 $ 108,400 $ 108,400 0.00 120 120 EDMSIOo Clase/Class/Template/Change Orders/Change Order Status Repoli(003717854) Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Punchlist Contractors C.O. No.: One (1) Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1. Job No. SP2000-59 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Be9uat) $51,364.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — MISCELLANEOUS DESIGN CHANGES This item is for the following design plan changes: • Removal of pinlight covers • Additional blocking for the tie-in of the North wall • Added concrete gutter for improved drainage • Insulation material changed to formaldehyde free • Rerouting of planter drainage lines • Added rain pits and rerouted flow from the roof drains • Raised height of building to match canopy of existing Purchasing Building • Added sloping retaining wall • Change in the type of kitchenette doors • Rerouting of A/C condensate line • Modifications to window framing • Double paper stucco lathing • Relocation of duplex receptacles • Roof flashings changed from aluminum to lead material The aforementioned changes were initiated from the City of Fountain Valley Building Inspector's requests, and for design drawing details that were not compatible with the current provisions of the building code. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 39 (B)l of the General Requirements. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,092.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 34 Calendar Days ITEM 2—MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMEMTS OMITTED FROM CONTRACT DOCUMENTS This item is for the following miscellaneous improvements: • Ten additional fire sprinkler heads • Added trap primer • Structural strengthening of the parapet • Added air conditioning structural support • Added aluminum groove detail to walls of new conference room • Added aluminum ventilation material to the underside of new canopy t Page 2 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Punchlist Contractors C.O. No.: One (1) Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1 Job No. SP2000-59 • Structural connection of canopy • Added fire blocking to walls • Added roof cricket The above improvements were either omitted from the design drawings or the construction details were inadequate from both a structural and architectural standpoint. The majority of these omissions were identified by the City's Building Inspector. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 39(B)1 of the General Requirements. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6.322.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 27 Calendar Days ITEM 3—INSPECTION OF EXISTING CAST IRON SEWER PIPE This item is for locating, excavating, and backfilling an existing cast iron pipe that upon initial visual inspection was thought to be cracked and badly corroded. The extra costs incurred by the Contractor to investigate the condition of this pipe were outside the Contract Scope of Work. This sewer pipe was located at an existing manhole where a drop manhole connection was being made. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 39(8) 1 of the General Requirements. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 575.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days ITEM 4—ADDITIONAL FOUNDATION WORK This item is for additional labor and material costs to increase the depth of the footings 18-inch stem wall. Contractor was required to excavate an additional 18-inches due to very high moisture content of the soil and an undisclosed 6-inch to 9-inch clay strata. Contract documents required that select material be used for the base material, but due to the geotechnical conditions, the specification requirement for 95% compaction could not be achieved. The District's Geotechnical Consultant recommended that the contractor use a Class 2 base material. Contractor incurred extra costs for base material, excavation and haul off, additional rebar, concrete, and form work. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 39(B)l of the General Requirement. (Reference FCO No. 0025) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,350.D0 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 28 Calendar Days Page 3 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Punchlist Contractors C.O. No.: One (1) Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1. Job No. SP2000-59 ITEM 5—MODIFICATION OF HANDICAP RAMP AND RAILING This item is for the alteration of the entrance ramp and landing to both the existing Purchasing Building and the New Purchasing Conference Room. The City of Fountain Valley's Building Inspector issued a violation notice, per ADA Title No. 24, stating that the threshold to the new Purchasing Building was too high and the landing between both entrance doors was not Flat (i.e., Title 24 allows only a Yrinch maximum elevation difference between landing and the threshold); the ramp crossfall slope was in excess of the 2 percent allowed, and the ramp longitudinal slope was not in compliance with the 1:12 slope requirement. The existing handicap ramp and landing, which provides access for both buildings was built prior to the Title 24 Building Codes, and is therefore now subject to its enforcement. The extra work consisted of breaking out the existing brick landing and concrete ramp and relaying to new levels; removal of existing handrails and the procurement and installation of new anodized aluminum handrails per District standards and Title 24 requirements; installation of new brick pavers; installation of cross drainage pipe; additional handicap signage; and cleanup. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference FCO No. 0010. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $28,025.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 37 Calendar Days ITEM 6—TIME EXTENSIONS Pursuant to the Contract Documents, the Contractor is entitled to be granted time extensions for work that is delayed by Inclement weather. Contractor is granted 3 days time extension. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $51.364.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 131 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Punchlist Contractors C.O. No.: One (1) Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Purchasing Conference Room at Plant No. 1. Job No. SP2000-59 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 131 calendar day time extension is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by the Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 25, 2001 Original Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: February 21, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 131 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 131 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 251 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 2, 2002 Projected Completion Date: August 9, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 38 Days Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $ 108,400.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Med -GI) $ 51.364.00 Amended Contract Price $ 159,764.00 f Page 5 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Punchlist Contractors C.O. No.: One (1) Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Purchasino Conference Room at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2000-59 Board Authorization Date: September 25. 2002 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Engineering/Construction Manager Date John D. Linder Approved by: Director of Engineering Date David A. Ludwin Accepted by: PUNCHLIST CONTRACTORS Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date TOBE.or Dir. 09/05/02 wiss12 Ib AGENDA REPORT xnNumber Ran Number vocD2-6i tarot Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL, JOB NO. J-71-7 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job No. J-71-7, with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$91,069, increasing the contract amount to $1,254,569. SUMMARY Background • Job No. J-71-7, Scrubber Monitor and Control, includes installation of 27 District furnished Vapex scrubber monitoring and control units. The purpose of this project is to optimize chemical usage in the scrubbers, thereby reducing odors and odor complaints. • Lee and Ro, Inc. prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction, Inc. on December 19, 2001. • Item No. 4 of this change order includes costs to modify control circuits to Vapex units. These changes include adding terminal blocks and upgrading the specked contact blocks and isolators. These changes will improve control capabilities and aid in better operation and maintenance of the Vapex units. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date February 18, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date July 27, 2002 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date July 27, 2002 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 n.•.s erxine Page 1 r r Chanae Order No. 1 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 MCC-FA Modifications $6,060 0 Omission 2 Scrubber Piping Modifications $12,909 0 Design Change 3 Add Fiber Optics Line $28,632 0 Changed Conditions 4 Modifications to Vapex Controllers and $43,468 0 Design Change Control Circuits Total Change Order No. 1 $91,069 0 Job Completion The contract is now 95% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 1,163,500.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 91,069.00 Change Orders to Date $ 91,069.00 Percentage Increase to Date 7.83% Amended Contract Price $ 1,254,569.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 8, Page 109) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff requests a reallocation of funds in the amount of$212,003 to include costs for this change order and staff labor costs required to complete this project. Contingency budget has been reduced and reallocated to the construction contract and staff labor budget. There is no increase in the total project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None R ...W nO. Page 2 r CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Omer UM:dm WntglobaMgenda Draft RewrtsVDCKR J-71.7 CO 1 9.2602.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL JOB NO. J-71-7 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE/ BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUT TOTAL HORIZATIO TO DATE TO DATE(%) DECREASE N Protect Development $ 5.000 $ 5.000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 100% Studies/Permitting $ 101,000 $ 101,000 $ 101,000 $ 101.000 $ 101,000 $ 101,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 360.000 $ 360,000 $ 360,000 $ 359,951 $ 359.951 $ 305,000 85% Design Staff $ 34,000 $ 34.000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34.000 100% Construction Contract' $ 1.468.000 $ 1.818.000 $ 81,503 $ 1.899,503 $ 1.808,434 $ 9109 $ 1.899.503 $ 1.808.434 95% Construction Administration It 119,000 $ 119,000 $ 86,500 $ 205,500 $ 119.000 $ 86,500 $ 205,500 $ 200,500 98% Construction Inspection $ 41.000 $ 41.000 $ 44,000 $ 85,000 $ 41.000 $ 44,000 $ 85.000 $ 75.000 88% Contingency $ 254.000 It 254.000 $ (212,003) $ 41,997 $ - $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 2.382,000 $ 2,732,000 $ - $ 2732,000 $ 2.468,385 $ 221.569 $ 2.689.954 1 $ 2,528,934 94% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ - g $ - $ - 0% PROJECTNET $ 2.382.000 $ 2,732.000 1 $ - $ 2732,000 11 $ 2,468,385 $ 221,569 1 $ 2.689.954 1 $ 2,528,934 94% Construction Contract costs includes District Furnished Equipment EDMS W03738003 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT SCRUBBER MONITOR AND CONTROL JOB NO. J-71-7 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 2/18/02 $ 1,163,500 $ 1,163,500 160 160 CO NO. 1 Pending $ 91,069 $ 1,254,669 7.83% 0 160 EDMS#003738004 O ! Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: One (1) Date: September 25, 2002 - Job: Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job Number J-71-7 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $91,069.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —MCC-FA MODIFICATIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment to perform the following modifications to MCC-FA at the North Scrubber Complex: A. Install new MCC tub with two 480 V breakers, door and necessary hardware in MCC-FA. The breakers were necessary to provide power to the new Vapex units installed at the North Scrubber Complex. MCC-FA was installed under the J-33-1A project, however no provisions were made for the breakers necessary to provide power for the Vapex units. Cost of this change is $3,324.00. B. Provide temporary power for new Vapex units. The contract documents showed the new Vapex units to be powered from MCC-FA. MCC-FA was in the installation phase (under Job J-33-1A) and was not available during the startup of the new Vapex units. In order to avoid delays, temporary power was used to test and startup the new Vapex unds. Cost of this change is $2,736. Work items listed above were negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Division 1 Section 40.B.1 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Orders No. 1 and 6 and Margate Construction's Letters Dated March 19, 2002 and May 8, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6.060.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 0 Page 2 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job Number J-71-7 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. ITEM 2—SCRUBBER PIPING MODIFICATIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment to perform piping modifications to the scrubber make up water by-pass line to scrubber tanks at 27 locations. Work included adding CPVC pipe and fittings to the existing make up water system at each location. This work was not included in the contract documents and was done per Operations staff request. These modifications will enable operators to add water into chemical tanks manually and automatically in case of pH upsets. This additional work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Division 1, Section 40.6.2 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 2 and Margate Construction's Letter Dated July 16, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,909.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3—ADD FIBER OPTICS LINE This item is for labor, material, and equipment to add a fiber optic line from Dewatering Building C (existing panel)to Scrubbers D1, D2, and D3 (new panel under J-71-7). Work included installing 130 feet long, 1-inch diameter conduit with two tubes for fiber optics and necessary fittings for termination at the new panel and the existing panel. The fittings included two input modules, two terminal blocks, and four contact blocks. The new panel size was also increased in size to accommodate size of the new modem installed. The design drawings showed using a coaxial cable between the two panels (new and existing). During the period between design and construction, additional equipment was added in the area that creates noise and interferes with the signal transfer using coaxial cable. Fiber optics cables were used instead of the specified coaxial cable because they are immune to noise during signal transfer. This additional work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Division 1 Section 48.B.1 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 5 and Margate Construction's Letter July 17, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $28,632.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 6 Page 3 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job Number J-71-7 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. ITEM 4—MODIFICATIONS TO VAPEX CONTROLLERS AND CONTROL CIRCUITS This item is for labor, material, and equipment for the following control modifications to Vapex panels and control circuits: A. Install 178 Allen Bradley (logic reed) contact blocks in lieu of the specified 10 amp rated contact blocks. The new logic reed contact blocks were installed on all switch panels and field switches on this project because the specified 10 amp rated specified contact blocks are not recommended for long term use in low voltage circuits. The cost for this change includes credit for the specified contact blocks. Cost of this change is $3,229.00 B. Install 27 AC powered analog isolators in lieu of the specified loop powered analog isolators. During the startup of the Vapex units, it was determined that the loop powered isolators decreased output signal beyond the loop isolator's calibration capacity. During the trouble shooting process it was discovered that an external powered signal isolator would have adequate capacity to transmit signals. Therefore all loop signal isolators were replaced with AC powered isolators. The cost of this change includes credit for the specified loop powered analog isolators. Cost of this change is $17,816.00. C. Install three analog input modules in lieu of the specified discrete modules. During the shop drawings review of the project it was discovered that the three specified discrete input modules had to be replaced with three analog input modules for proper signal transfer. The specified discrete modules do not transfer analog signals (as required by field devices) and had to be replaced with analog input modules. The cost for this change includes credit for the specified discrete modules. Cost of this change is $2,189.00. D. Install terminal strips (24 terminal blocks each) for all Vapex units (total of 27) and update as built drawings to reflect this change. This change was necessary because there was not adequate number of terminal blocks in the District furnished Vapex units and these strips are required per the District's standards. Terminal strips used for landing field wiring help in better maintenance and troubleshooting of the Vapex units. Cost of this change is$18,349.00. E. Add wiring to five booster pumps in Vapex panels. The booster pumps in the District fumished Vapex controllers were not wired and were wired/tested to provide a functional system. Cost of this change is $1,885.00. Work items listed above were negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Division 1 Section 40.B.1 of the General Requirements. Reference District's Field Change Orders No. 3, 4, and 8 and Margate Construction's Letters Dated April 3, 2002, April 10. 2002,April 29, 2002, and June 24, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: $43,468.60 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days b Page 4 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job Number J-71-7 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $91,069.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: February 18, 2002 Original Contract Time: 160 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 28, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Projected Final Completion Date: July 28, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,163,500.00 Prev . Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 91,069.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,254,569.00 1 Page 5 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Scrubber Monitor and Control, Job Number J-71-7 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. Board Authorization Date: September 25, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: John Linder, Engineering and Construction Manager Date Approved by: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Margate Construction, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS#003738005 PDC COMMITTEE MeeNpDat• To ad.ofoir. 09105102 Dszsroz AGENDA REPORT ifem Number Vern NumE r PDCO2-62 13(i) Orange County sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$28,792 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, for a total budget of$2,011,073; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $48,792 and a time extension of 21 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,411,073. SUMMARY Background • Job No. J-66, Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, includes construction of a new meter vault and installation of a new flowmeter on the existing 120-inch outfall. • Tran Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Urbantec Engineers, Inc., on June 28, 2000. Specialized services during construction for soils testing, excavation, dewatering, and grouting design is being provided by Ninyo and Moore. • Change Order No. 1 issued in May of 2001 included extensive redesign to the below ground structures included in this project. The District's Geotechnical consultant recommended this redesign which reduced construction costs and risks with completing the work. Cost savings included in the redesign were associated with the following work activities: excavation, concrete, meter installation, and pipe support during construction. • Item Nos. 1 and 2 of this Change Order include costs for coredrilling two holes in the 120-inch outfall pipe for a future sampling station associated with the disinfection of final effluent. By coredrilling the holes at this time, extensive excavation, dewatering, and shoring will be avoided at the time of constructing the new sampling station. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date September 18, 2000 Original Contract Completion Date March 16, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Date August 10, 2002 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Change Order No. 4 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Install Sampler Ports in 120-inch Outfall $20,481 21 Other: Future Pie Jobs 2 Delay Costs $25,200 0 Other. Future Jobs 3 Add Stair Nosing $3,111 0 Design Change Total Change Order No. 4 $48,792 21 Job Completion The contract is now 95% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 416,281.00 This Change (Add) (Deduet) $ 48,792.00 Change Orders to Date $ 465,073.00 Percentage Increase to Date 49.16%` Amended Contract Price $1,411,073.00 'Change Order Nos. 2 and 3 included costs in the amount of$401,588 to perform grouting below the 120-inch outfall pipe due to unforeseen soil conditions. The total change order percentage including Change Order No. 4, would be 6.71%without Change Order Nos. 2 and 3 grouting costs. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section s, Page ae) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) 2 fi,NYE: VlON1 Staff requests a budget amendment of$28,792. The additional funds requested for this project provide for the change order. Some of the funds for the closeout are reallocated from Construction Staff to Construction Contract. Please refer to the Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan. The final EIR was approved on October 27, 1999 and the Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order UM:dm:lc G:NVobalWgenda Drag Report TDC1AR J-66 C04 092502.doc ae+aea: azao, 3 Page 2 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Four 4 Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers ITEM 2— DELAY COSTS This item includes delay costs associated with Item 1. The delay costs include costs for Contractor's field office and home office overhead and equipment rentals on the job site. The equipment rentals included a portable generator, dewatering pumps, settlement tank, well screens, and excavating equipment. The cost breakdown is as follows: Contractor Field and Office Overhead Costs, $600 per day for 21 days $12,600.00 Equipment Rental Costs, $600 per day for 21 days $12,600.00 TOTAL COST $25,200.00 This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions, Reference Urbantec's Letter Dated June 12, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $25,200.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3: ADD STAIR NOSING This item includes costs for labor, material, and equipment to add nosings to stair treads and provide Y, inch batter to risers. The nosings were added to protect the concrete edges and the batter was provided to comply with the District's Safety Standards. This work was not included in the contract documents and was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)b of the General Provisions:Reference Urbantec's Letter Dated June 12, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,111.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $48,792.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 21 Calendar Days V Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbamec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Four 4 Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 21-day extension of time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 18, 2000 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 16, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 21 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 512 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 692 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 10, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 416,281.00 This Change (Add) (Daduet) $ 48,792.00 Amended Contract Price $1,411,073.00 f. II Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 82728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Four 4 Date: September 25, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: September 25, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, Construction & Engineering Manager Date Approved by: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. Contractor Date EMS:OD3738154 / T Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. PDC COMMITTEE 091051oz o91Z110z AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCD2-65 13(1) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: William Cassidy, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 1-10 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. to provide engineering services for the design and construction support of the Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 1-10, for an amount not to exceed $3,186,027. SUMMARY • The latest update to Orange County Sanitation District's (District) 1999 Strategic Plan requires flow at a rate up to 49-million gallons per day (mgd) destined for Plant No. 2 to be redirected to Plant No. 1. The diversion is required to match influent flows to plant capacities and provide minimum flows to Plant No. 1 for reclamation. • An additional 11-mgd (total 60-mgd) is to be redirected during the latter stages of the construction of the Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-66. Construction of the headworks improvements is scheduled to begin in March 2005; the additional diversion of flow is scheduled to begin in 2006. • Currently, 3 to 10-mgd can be redirected from Plant No. 2 tributary sewers to Plant No. 1 using the existing Ellis Avenue Pump Station. An additional 1 to 6-mgd could be redirected by diverting flows destined for the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) to the Newhope Trunk. SARI flows are treated at Plant No. 2, while Newhope flows are treated at Plant No. 1. Thus, in order to divert a total flow rate of 49 to 60-mgd, a new Ellis Avenue Pump Station and force main are required. A new diversion structure and gravity line to connect the Miller-Holder Trunk to the Goldenwest Trunk will also be required. • The 1999 Strategic Plan Update also identifies that a second interplant line (84-inch) in Ellis Avenue will be required by Year 2010. Construction would be scheduled for 2008-09, following construction of the new Ellis Avenue Pump Station/force main by only three years. Staff recommends the two projects be done at the same time under this Professional Services Agreement (PSA). • The PSA includes the preparation of a Preliminary Design Report, Construction Documents, and Construction Support Services. Project Elements include, but are not limited to, determination of pump station site and pipeline alignments, utility research, determination of flows, system hydraulics, process control integration, CEQA and permit support, coordination with adjacent projects, geotechnical investigations, control surveys, and bid and construction support services. • Sixty-seven weeks have been scheduled for the design work. Construction is scheduled to be completed by December 2005. • Staff received proposals from the following four firms (or teams) on June 4, 2002: Black &Veatch, Boyle Engineering/Carollo Engineers, Brown and Caldwell, and Malcolm Pimie, Inc./RBF Consulting. Staff first reviewed and ranked the proposals, then interviewed the top two firms on June 20, 2002. Staff recommends approval of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for the engineering, design, and construction support services for the new pump stationtforce main and interplant line with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. See attached "Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services" for more information. • Subsequent to the proposal evaluation, Staff revised the Consultant's Scope of Work (SOW)to include the following: 1. Determine current and future flows destined for the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI)that could be redirected to the Newhope and/or Euclid trunks and the extent those trunks would require enlarging. Also, provide a life cycle cost analysis comparison of enlarging the trunks with the incremental decease in capacity of the new Ellis Avenue Pump Station. 2. Determine the feasibility of combining Sunflower flow and Plant No. 2 diverted flows (Magnolia, Knott and Miller-Holder) into a single new Ellis Avenue Pump Station at Plant No.1. Also, provide a life cycle cost analysis comparison of the incremental increase in capacity of the new station with operation and maintenance of two pump stations. 3. Determine the feasibility of placing the new Ellis Avenue Pump Station and force main in Garfield Avenue. Also, provide a life cycle cost analysis comparison of the Garfield Avenue alignment with the Ellis Avenue alignments. The Consultant's proposal for the original SOW was for$3,086,434. Staff negotiated with the Consultant for the added SOW a fee of$99,593. Thus, the total fee for the revised SOW is for an amount not to exceed $3,186,027. Staff recommends approval of a PSA for the engineering, design, and construction support services including the revised SOW for the new pump station/force main and interplant line with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $3,186,027. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget estimate for Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 1-10, is $27,100,000. This request is for$3,186,027 for the PSA, $1,386,027 over budget estimate. Money will be moved from Contingency to the Design Consultant task to cover the additional cost. See attached Budget Information Table for more information. wma:eaou, Page 2 V BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2002/2003 Budget Section 8 pages 8 and 58, Project No. 1-10.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This request also includes authorization of budget for Staff consisting of: $30,000 for Project Development, $97,000 for Studies/Permitting, and $290,000 for Design. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Both Orange County Sanitation District's (District) 1989 Master Plan and 1999 Strategic Plan recommended equalizing flows to Plants No. 1 and 2 to provide the lowest overall new facilities capital cost program. The District's recent decision to change to full secondary treatment does not affect the recommendation. Each plan included moving treatment of Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) flows from Plant No. 2 to Plant No.1 to balance the flows between the plants. However, the Department of Health Services (DHS) has since required that SARI flows continue to be treated at Plant No. 2. This is because Plant No. 1's secondary effluent is the influent for Factory 21 and the Groundwater Replenishment System (GW RS). To counter the loss of 49 million gallons per day (mgd) of SARI flow to Plant No. 1, the District will have to do one or more of the following projects: • Divert sewage flows entering SARI to either or both the Newhope and Euclid trunks (Plant No. 1). Current flows of 1 to 6-mgd (low to peak wet weather respectively)to year 2020 flows of 5 to 32-mgd could be diverted. However, flow rates over 6-mgd would require extensive replacement of pipe in either or both trunks. • Divert flow from Magnolia and Knott trunks (Plant No. 2). Current flow in the Magnolia Trunk ranges 3 to 23-mgd. The existing Ellis Avenue Pump Station can be used to divert up to 10-mgd to Plant No. 1. The ongoing Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, will combine flaw from the Magnolia Trunk with the lower Knott Trunk (30 to 69-mgd). A new pump station is required to take advantage of the total flow (33 to 82-mgd) available. • Divert flow from the Miller-Holder Trunk (Plant No. 2)to the Knott Trunk upstream of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station. The additional flow from the Miller-Holder Trunk will be required during low flow conditions. The flow (3 to 19-mgd) is to be diverted using a new diversion structure/gravity sewer and the existing Slater Pump Station, RnIW WWI Page 3 L The existing Ellis Avenue Pump Station was built in 1952 and last rehabilitated in 1987. It is located beneath the intersection of Ellis and Bushard, approximately 6,800 feet west of the main entrance to Plant No. 1. The station has two (1 duty, 1 standby) non- clog vertical sewage pumps with a capacity of 10-mgd. The station's force main consists of a 36" gravity reinforced concrete pipe built in 1953, converted to a pressure pipe in 1982 with a techite liner. The force main lies beneath the west bound lanes of Ellis Avenue. The SARI Trunk is diverted to Plant No. 2 at Plant No. 1's Metering and Diversion Structure. The flow is diverted prior to coming in contact with flow from other trunks entering Plant No. 1. Flow from the other trunks can also be diverted, when required, without the SARI flow contaminating flows continuing into Plant No. 1's treatment facilities. Diverted flows during peak wet weather are expected to exceed the capacity (92-mgd)of the existing 78-inch Interplant Line in Ellis Avenue by Year 2011. Ultimately, up to 195-mgd in peak wet weather flows will be diverted from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2. The additional flow will require an 84-inch line in parallel with the existing 78-inch line. ALTERNATIVES The Professional Services Agreement may be awarded to another engineering firm that submitted a proposal. CEQA FINDINGS This project was not in the 1999 Strategic Plan, thus not in the 1999 Program Environmental Impact Report. The project will require new CEQA work to be completed. The extent of work will be determined as part of the Preliminary Design Report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services 4. Figure 1 Location Map WC:sa G:WoobaKAgenda Draft Reports PDOAR 1-10 Approve PSA 090502.dm vm�1 Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station Contract No. 1-10 lol 00kki ht`o P6"s 0 FOR s �,'li.tyDelt 4s =iu L � OE+�SED' �ESI.I(N4Ti;`l5 irl}�071,F>OT b�kRl OIL, �T6 -`s ERPENDIY(I �� $1YDdET A Ei9n �tilsE: s e tb ro v� x Atht�tzptxYmorY To EA Y�fiA�j' Project Development $ 30.000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30.000 0% Studies/Permitting $ 97,000 $ 97.000 $ 97,000 $ 97.000 $ 97,000 0% Design Consultant $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,386,027 $ 3,186,027 $ 3,186,027 $ 3,186,027 0% Design Staff $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 0% Property Pmperty Purchase $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Construction Contract $ 18,848,000 $ 16,848,000 $ 18,846,000 $ Construction Administration $ 419.000 $ 419.000 $ 419,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 626,000 $ 526.000 $ 526,000 $ Contingency $ 4,590,000 $ 4,590.000 $ 1386027 $ 3,203,973 $ PROJECTTOTAL $ 27,100.000 $ 27,100,000 $ _ $ 27,100,000 $ - $ 3,603.027 $ 3,603,027 $ 0% Reimbursable Costs $ _ 1 $ $ PROJECTNET $ 27,100,000 1 $ 27,100,000 1 $ - 1 $ 27,100,000 $ - $ 3.603,027 $ 3,603,027 $ 0% 1-10 Budget TableAs Page 1 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station Contract No. 1-10 Total Project Budget: $27,100,000 Consultant: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Start Date of Project: September 25, 2002 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Engineering, design, and construction support Pending Original services for a new Ellis Avenue Pump Station & $3,186,027 $3,186,027 PSA force main and interplant line in Ellis Avenue EDM$003738323 08/12/02 ReNsee 05/14/98 Y REPLACEMENT OF THE ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 1-10 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Black&Veatch • Boyle Engineering • Brown &Caldwell • Carole Engineers • Malcolm Pimie, Inc. • RBF Consulting Carollo Engineers partnered with Boyle Engineering and RBF Consulting partnered with Malcolm Pimie, Inc. for this project. As a result, there were four responsive proposals received on June 4, 2002. Each member of an in-house review panel individually ranked the proposals. The review panel consisted of seven members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in six weighted categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work (Weight: 12)— Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work(Weight: 7)— Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Proposed Schedule (Weight: 5)—Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications (Weight: 6) —A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Applicable Related Project Experience(Weight: 4)—Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 6. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants (Weight: 2)—Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. The rankings were compiled on June 13, 2002. The top two ranked firms were invited to interview on June 20, 2002 and again individually ranked. The following summarizes their final ranking: 1. Malcolm Pimie, Inc. 1,966 Points 2. Black &Veatch 1,851 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the top ranked consultant: Malcolm Pimie, Inc. Malcolm Pimie, Inc. had the highest-ranked proposal based on meeting the Orange County Sanitation District's requirements for understanding of the Scope of Work, project approach, management techniques, applicable project experience, team organization and use of sub-consultants. Malcolm Pimie's understanding of the Scope of Work and insights into critical project issues including determination of flows, system hydraulics, wet well design, instrumentation and control (I&C)issues, and community (construction) issues were the best compared to all of the other consultants. Malcolm Pimie's quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) procedures were excellent. The staffs qualifications are good. The staff has the best similar and most recent project experience. The proposed project team, including sub-consultants, is well organized based on specialties and division of work. Fee Proposals After the final ranking of the proposals, the seal fee proposals submitted by the two interviewed fines, were opened. The top ranked consultant, Malcolm Pimie, Inc., submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Malcolm Pimie's fee proposal is 22.5% lower than the second ranked consultant, Black and Veatch. Staff recommends Malcolm Pimie, Inc. be awarded the Professional Services Agreement for the Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 1-10,for a total fee not to exceed $3,086,434. WDC:sa EMS 003739325 TABLE 1.0 REPLACEMENT OF THE ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 1-10 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm Black & Veatch Malcom Pirnie, Inc. Reviewer A 331 327 Reviewer B 279 343 Reviewer C 263 298 Reviewer D 290 296 Reviewer E 262 186 Reviewer F 210 269 Reviewer G 216 247 Total Score (2520 Points Maximum) 1,851 1966 Average Score (360 Points Maximum) 264 281 Design Workforce Estimate (Man-hours) 22,630 17,444 Construction Workforce Estimate (Man-hours) 6,426 5,866 Total Workforce Estimate (Man-hours) 29,056 23,310 Proposed Design Schedule (Weeks) 67 67 Proposed Fee, Not to Exceed $3,984,212 $3,086,434 G ' P CNWc.v FMnMo.. P wiaEn-:wnn Y n iiC vulD 3 [w ®v Y p MTF Yw ® Jos ,Of d- o, e k N6 s ' � f s' N Figure 1 A Location Map NTS Source:Strategic Plan 07l30/2ooY PDC COMMITTEE MeebngDate To3d.ofDir. 09/05/02 09/25/02 AGENDA REPORT It PD Item Number PDCO2-66 02-66 13(k) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: William Cassidy, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO THE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 7-7-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a budget amendment of$523,000 to Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2, for a total project budget of$969,000, to be reimbursed by Boyle Engineering. SUMMARY • The five 200-horsepower sewage pumps were installed in November 1998 on the station's easterly bay as part of Improvements to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1. During low to moderate flow conditions, these pumps cavitate. Cavitation, the collapse of vapor bubbles as flow passes through the pump, causes rapid wear and excessive vibration in the pump. Cavitation also reduces the pump's capacity and efficiency. Designed for a total capacity of 40.4 million gallons per day (mgd) to handle peak wet weather(storm)flows, the pumps have been restricted to 30.5 mgd to eliminate the cavitation. • The design consultant for Contract No. 7-7-1 and staff investigated the cause, and reviewed numerous remedies to minimize and/or eliminate the cavitation. It was determined that an error during design resulted in the wrong pumps being specified. Staff determined that the pumps must be replaced to permanently eliminate cavitation. • The project is being administered in accordance with standard District policies and procedures. The design consultant is providing engineering design services for the project at no cost to the District. The consultant has also agreed to reimburse all project-related construction and District staff costs. A reimbursement agreement with the design consultant is under development. The agreement will be finalized for Board approval prior to the award of any construction contracts. • In March 2001, the Orange County Sanitation District (District) established a budget (Modifications to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2) to track costs associated with replacing five pumps at the Main Street Pump Station. The original budget estimate was based on only replacing the pumps and a section of each pump's extended shaft. Further design efforts determined that entire shafts, suction and discharge piping and supports would have to be replaced. A valve used to restrict the pumps' flow will also be replaced. Thus, the cost estimate for replacing the pumps has been revised. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Construction costs for the project have been updated. The Engineer's latest construction estimate includes an additional $445,000 for a total of$740,000. The - construction costs, plus costs for additional staff effort and contingencies, are reflected in the attached Budget Information Table. The total additional cost of $523.000, for a total project budget of$969,000, is to be reallocated from Capital Improvement Program reserves. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line ite.:20=200a Budget Section 8 pages 7s50,contract No.7-7-2.( ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The budget serves as a means to track costs. The design consultant will reimburse all costs associated with this project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The principle elements of the agreement are as follows: The Orange County Sanitation District (District) is to provide, in accordance with District policies and procedures, engineering plan check and inspection services with respect to replacing the pumps. The District shall also award and administer construction contracts for the project. The District shall pay for the increased costs should the new pumps or related equipment exceed the costs of the original equipment since those costs would have been incurred had the equipment been originally specified. The design consultant is to provide design and construction support services and final contract documents (plans and specifications)for the project. The consultant shall also take possession of the existing deficient equipment, material, and parts, including the five pumps to be replaced. The consultant shall reimburse the District for its actual engineering, inspection, administrative, and construction costs associated with the project. a<.ua. ago, Page 2 ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS This project is a continuation of the Improvements to the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1. to install pumps to correct a design error by the design consultant. Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Figure 1 Location Map WC:sa:jo GAntg1obaltAgenda Draft ReportetPDOAR 7.7.2 Approve Budget Amend 09OW2.dm + Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MODIFICATIONS TO THE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 7-7-2 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ - $ Studies/Permitting $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ - $ Consultant PSA $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ Design Staff $ 30.000 $ 30,000 $ (20.000 $ 10,000 $ 30,000 $ (20.000) $ 10,000 $ 1,571 16% Construction Contract $ 285.000 $ 285,000 $ 455,000 $ 740.000 $ Construction Administration $ 28,000 $ 31,000 $ 26.000 $ 57.000 $ Construction Inspection $ 27.000 $ 25,000 $ 40.000 $ 65,000 $ Contingency $ 75,000 $ 75.000 $ 22,000 $ 97,000 $ PROJECTTOTAL $ 445,000 $ 446.000 1 $ 523.000 $ 969,000 $ 30.000 $ (20,000) $ 10,000 $ 1,571 16% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ 445,000 $ 446.000 1 $ 523,000 $ 969,000 PROJECT NET $ - $ - 1 $ - $ $ 30,000 1 $ (20,000) $ 10,000 $ 1.571 16% C'.tCassidyW 7 2 Main St PSgAR 74-2 Approve Bud9H Amend Buagat Table 090502 tlslDlsbic% fil pipe 111MY N' n ow 4 � A�vr IN PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date T008d of Dir. 09/05/02 912, 2 AGENDA REPORT "�Z� Itrn 3fM Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Engineer SUBJECT: EFFLUENT PATHOGEN REDUCTION EVALUATION STUDY, JOB NO. J-40-6 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc., for additional engineering services for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6, for an additional amount of$199,123, increasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $333,981. SUMMARY • This project will further study options for reducing the pathogen level of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) effluent, including ultraviolet light (UV) technologies, Peracetic Acid, and Chlorine Dioxide. • The project study is nearly complete and several pilot tests are being recommended for long term application at the District. • This addendum is for CH2M Hill, Inc. to complete the pilot testing phase of the project and includes; preparing testing protocols, providing testing program oversight, and preparing testing reports. • District staff, equipment vendors, and contractors will install, operate, and maintain the pilot units for up to six months. • The pilot testing program is proposed to include the following technologies: microwave induced UV light equipment, conventional open channel UV equipment, conventional in-pipe UV equipment, Peracetic Acid (bench scale testing only), and Chlorine Dioxide (bench scale testing only). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total budget for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6, is $900,000. Authorization of$199,123, from the Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is being requested for a total not to exceed contract with CH2M Hill, Inc. to $333,981. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8- Line 129.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION On February 11, 2002, during routine ocean monitoring, the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) staff observed evidence of the plume surfacing three miles off shore. In addition, the plume was observed within a half-mile of Newport Beach at a depth of 45 feet below the surface. This did not demonstrate that the District's release of effluent to the ocean impacted the beach or recreational waters, but, it suggests that a mechanism exists whereby offshore winds mix deeper water into the surface layers carrying the treated wastewater release up to the surface, or near the surface. The bacterial values detected did not exceed applicable water quality standards, but this was the first time the plume has been found surfacing several miles offshore. Regardless, District staff approached the Board of Directors in March 2002 to consider disinfection of the ocean outfall effluent. The Board of Directors designated the use of bleach (with sodium bisulfde dechlorination)as the option for immediate implementation; and authorized District staff to expeditiously complete the work necessary to get disinfection operational. The Board of Directors also noted that the District should consider other disinfection technologies for future implementation. This work effort is designed to satisfy the Board of Directors' request to consider other disinfection options for future implementation. The pilot work will be used to select technologies for the long-term disinfection strategy. Additionally, the District will receive up to $250,000 in grant funding from the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission for purposes of conducting a pathogen reduction pilot testing program. The provisions in Senate Bill 28X, Section 13 (b) specify the availability of funds ($250,000) that, in consultation with the Orange County Sanitation District, are to be used for studies to remediate or mitigate effects of shoreline water contamination located in the vicinity of the City of Huntington Beach. This grant will not fully fund the program, but it will expand the proposed testing of the disinfection technologies. ALTERNATIVES Do not perform pilot testing on other disinfection technologies and continue disinfection using bleach as the long-term option for the District. 2 CEQA FINDINGS .Y+ The recommended action is for conducting research. This activity is exempt under CEQA and a notice of exemption will be filed with the County of Orange. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report JB:sa G:t tglobaMgenda D2B ReW tsUdnt BOa sU4M AR-090502.dw 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE EFFLUENT PATHOGEN REDUCTION EVALUATION STUDY JOB NO. J-40-6 Project Development $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 `' $ 20.000 $ 20,000 $ 3,783 19% Studies/Permitting $ 206.000 $ 675.000 $ 675.000 1_' $ 134,858 $ 199.123 $ 333.981 $ 134.858 40% i rAdministraUon $ - yv,! $ - $ - $ - 0% $ 120,000 $ 120,000 J $ 120,000 $ 120,000 8 17,826 0% Constructiont $ '1 $ $ - $ 0% t--; $ {': $ $ - $ 0% Consimction ` Inspection $ j $ - $ - $ 0% Conlingency $ 25,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 w $ $ - $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 250,000 $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 ; $ 274,858 $ 199.123 $ 473,981 $ 156,467 33% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ - 1 $ 250,000 1 $ 250,000 $ - $ - 0% PROJECT NET $ 250,000 1 $ 650,000 1 $ - $ 650,000 A> $ 274.858 $ 199.123 1 $ 473,981 1 $ 156,467 33% hft"dlalanalta 5%s pet table Form RavlWOd.4,20W Professional Services Agreement Status Report Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study Job No. J40-6 Total Project Budget: $900,000 Consultant: CH2M Hill, Inc. Start Date of Project: July 1, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs March Original 2002 9 Engineering services for Effluent Pathogen $134,858 $134,858 PSA Reduction Evaluation Study. Pending 1 Engineering services for disinfection technology $199,123 $333,981 pilot testing program. C WileNetWIPU-40A Disinfection StudyU4ae PSA Status Repo""-02_eoc OW2/02 Revised 05/14/98 �r�, PDC COMMITTEE Mcedn9Date Toad.cr Dir. 09/Ds/02 09/29ro2 AGENDA REPORT 10viNuinDe Item Nonibe PDCO239 13 m Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Engineer SUBJECT: LONG RANGE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN, JOB NO. J40-7 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$100,913 for Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J40-7, for a total project budget of$572,913; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for engineering services for the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J40-7, for an amount not to exceed $490,913. SUMMARY • This project will develop and compare options for managing the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) biosolids. The outcome of the project will be a strategy for biosolids management for the next 10 to 15 years. • Since completion of the 1999 Strategic Plan, land application options for biosolids in Calffomia have become tenuous. Many of the District's present management options will no longer be feasible due to new local ordinances; therefore, new options must be explored, and a new strategy must be developed. • Staff solicited proposals for the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J40-7, from seven fines: Black and Veatch , Brown and Caldwell, Carollo Engineers, CH2M Hill, Inc., Camp Dresser and McKee, Montgomery Watson Harca, and Tetra Tech. Two proposals were received, one containing three of the solicited consultants teaming together and the other containing only one of the solicited consultants. • Staff evaluated the proposals and rated CH2M Hill, Inc. the highest overall. They had a highly qualified team with extensive local biosolids planning experience, and an approach that will assure a successful project. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services for more information. • During the negotiation phase of the selection process, Staff expanded the project Scope of Work to include review and assessment of the numerous unsolicited proposals from vendors being received by the District. In addition, several other project elements were expanded to allow the District to evaluate additional technologies being proposed by vendors. This change is scope does not affect the selection of the consultant. 1 • Staff recommends approval of a Professional Service Agreement (PSA)with CH2M Hill, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $490,913. • The study is estimated to take 24 weeks to complete and will begin within one month after the approval of the PSA. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total project budget for Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, is $592,913. Authorization of$490,913 from the Studies/Permitting is being requested. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Page 127) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Under"Proposed Budget Increase,' an additional $100,913 is being requested and $90,000 is being reallocated from contingency. This will adjust the budget for the additional consulting services costs needed for the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, to a total of$592,913. The proposed source of funding is from the District's Capital Improvement Reserves. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. The project budget was developed in the early part of 2002. Since that time, the complexity of biosolids management for the Orange County Sanitation District (District) and the State of California has continued to increase. Therefore, this budget amendment of$100,913 is necessary for the District to thoroughly develop its plan for future biosolids management. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District is facing significant biosolids management hurdles in the very near future. These include regulatory, political, economic, and environmental roadblocks and pressures that have severally impacted biosolids management in Southern California, as well as in the western United States. This project will develop a 10 to 15-year detailed plan for District biosolids management. This region's tremendous volume of biosolids and funding dedicated to this issue has come to the attention of equipment vendors, out-of-state farm operators, inventors, and entrepreneurs from all over the world. District staff has received a number of unsolicited proposals each week over the last year. These proposals need to be reviewed by the consultant preparing the Long Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, to flush out potential options for the District's overall biosolids management program. 2 e ALTERNATIVES Do not develop the plan. Under this alternative,we would be forced to rely on the existing biosolids management strategies and Strategic Plan analysis. Significant changes have occurred since 1999. Those strategies and plans will not allow sustained biosolids management for the Orange County Sanitation District. CEQA FINDINGS The recommended action is for conducting planning-level engineering, and financial studies, and does not require CEQA documentation. Should a decision be made to proceed with an alternative other than the certified 1999 Strategic Plan and the 1989 Master Plan preferred alternatives, further CEQA analysis may be required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals JB:sa WadWatallntglobaMgenda Draft ReponsUolnt B02lds\AR Long Range Biosolids J40-7-090502.doc 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE LONG RANGE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN JOB NO. J40-7 —wo Project Development $ 20.000 $ 20,000 20.000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 00/6 Studies/Pernritting $ 282,000 $ 300,000 1190,913 $ 490.913 $ - 490.913 It 490,913 $ 0% Consultant PSA $ $ $ $ $ 0% Design Staff $ $ 82,000 $ 82.000 jL. $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 0% Construction Contract $ $ - $ - $ $ $ 0% Construction Administration $ $ $ $ $ $ 0% Construction Inspection $ $ $ $ $ % Contingency $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ (90.000)1$ f. $ $ $ - 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 392.000 , $ 492.0001 $ 100,9113 1 $ 592,913 $ 102,000 $ 490,913 $ 592,913 $ - 0% iq lReimbursable Costs 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - IPROJECT NET 1 $ 392,0001 $ 492,000 1 $ 100.9131 $ 592,913 1�-?j $ 102,0001 $ 490,9131 $ 592.9131 $ - 1 n C WileNeVWIn 40.7 Bioadida LT MFNJ40-7 BIT 7-5-02.Aall)afips table Form Revived Cd.4.2000 Professional Services Agreement Status Report LONG RANGE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN JOB NO. J-40-7 Total Proposed Project Budget: $592,913 Consultant: CH2M Hill, Inc. Start Date of Project: July 2002 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original Long Range Biosolids Management Plan $490,913 $490,91PSA Edm 003735242 R"Ld 05114198 LONG RANGE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PLAN JOB NO. J-40-7 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals (RFP): • Black and Veatch • Brown and Caldwell • Carollo Engineers • CH2M Hill, Inc. • Camp Dresser and McKee • Montgomery Watson Harza • Tetra Tech Black and Veatch, Brown and Caldwell, and Montgomery Watson Harza declined to submit a proposal. One proposal contained three of the interested firms. Consequently, there were two responsive proposals received on May 7, 2002. Proposals were reviewed in-house by a review panel from May 6 to July 23, 2002. Formal interviews were not conducted. The review panel consisted of seven members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work -- Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work — Rate the team's project management techniques and methods, and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience — Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications —A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. S. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants --Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule — Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. The two proposals were reviewed and evaluated. After evaluating the proposal, it was determined that CH2M Hill's, Inc. proposal is superior and the Orange County Sanitation District (District) should pursue a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with CH2M Hill, Inc. The following summarizes the attached results for the five firms: 1. CH2M Hill, Inc. (with CDM, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc.) 1999.5 Points 2. Carollo Engineers 1747.5 Points 3. Black and Veatch Declined to Submit 4. Brown and Caldwell Declined to Submit 5. Montgomery Watson Harza Declined to Submit The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: CH2M Hill. Inc. (with Camp Dresser and Mckee. Inc. (CDM). and Tetra Tech, Inc. CH2M Hill, Inc. teamed up with CDM, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. to form the best team for the project. The company's experts from the three firms complimented each other very well. Each member of the team, including the subconsultant team members, has extensive local and national experience in biosolids management. CH2M Hill, Inc. was a key partner for the recently completed Inland Empire Utilities Agency's (IEUA) Biosolids Master Plan and has the most relevant regional biosolids master planning experience. Carollo Engineers Carollo Engineers recently completed the District's Short-term Biosolids Master Plan. The Carollo Engineers proposal was strong but the entire project team did not match the experience of the CH2M Hill, Inc. team. The selection committee felt that the District needs the best overall team to complete this project given the difficulties of biosolids management in California, particularly Southern California. Black and Veatch. Brown and Caldwell. and Montgomery Watson Harza There were several reasons that the other firms declined to propose on the project. In most cases, the frrm's biosolids groups were interested in the project, however, the company, or its local office, would not be able to support the project at this time. Summary CH2M Hill, Inc. has the best overall proposal and project team for the District. Their project team, approach, and collective experience is necessary to allow for a successful project and Staff recommends moving forward with the CH2M Hill, Inc. team. JB:sa TABLE 1.0 Long Range Biosolids Management Plan Job No. J-40-7 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm CH2MHill (w/ CDM Carollo B&V B&C MINH &TT) Reviewer A 338.5 332.5 Reviewer 220 182 Reviewer 260 220 Reviewer D 314 241 Reviewer 301 241 Reviewer 340 333 Reviewer 226 198 Total Score 1999.5 1747.5 (2,450 Points Maximum) Average Score 286 250 (350 Points Maximum) Workforce Estimate - Man-hours(') 3235 - Original 3104 3523- Final 100% Design Completion Proposed 24 24 (Weeks) Proposed Not to Exceed Fee(') $453,199 -Original $425,166 Declined to Declined to Declined to $490,913 - Final Submit Submit Submit (•)CH2MHill's final figures are based on revisions to the scope of work after the firm was selected. The revisions to the scope of work added to the overall project effortand included additional analysis of the volumes of unsolicited biosolids management proposals being received by the District. _08/07/02 11:10 FAZ 714.429 2050 CHU HILL 0001 r�iar 1mr. - a�Or. sine mo my arnb Me.CA IQnn CH2 H0LL rm nsmauoo ru neass.mm August 6,2002 Orange County Sanitation District Engineering Department 10944 Bills Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Attn: Jim Burror Subject Fee Proposal for Professional Engineering Services, Long Term Biosobds Master Plan,Job No.J-40-7 Dear Mr.Burros We appreciate the opportunity to work with you and the District staff on this exciting project We reviewed the revised Scope of Work,dated June 27,2002.Our updated level of effort for completing the work,which includes the new Project Dement 5 and all other revisions to the original scope of work is attached As you requested,we deleted the"Optional Element A-Risk Model"from our level of effort and fee estimate. C112M HILL offers the District the following fees for completing the project: CHZM BML Consulting Services including: -Burdened labor $150,550.00 -Overhead at 98.866824-percent of burdened $148,844.00 labor -Profit(includes overhead and burdened labor at 10-percent) $29,939.00 Subtwd---Consulting Services including burdened labor,overhead and profit,not-to exceed: $329,333.00 Subconsultant fees at boudy razes,per Schedule,no-to-exceed: • CDM $61,920.00 • Tetra Tech $97,960.00 Total Subconsultants $149,880.00 Direct costs,not-torxceed: $11,700.00 TOTAL,notAom ceed $490,913.00 08/07/02 11:11 PAx 714 429, YOSO CHYtl HILL QaaY we appreciate this opportunity and look forward to working with you and the Dlstnctstaff on this project. If you have any questions or need any further information,please call Fred Soroushian at 114-429-2020 ext.2232 or Sava Nedic at extenaion 2313. Sincerely, CH2M bULL sag E.Sal ,P.E.,15ES Vice Ptcadmt O Im O V Level of Effort for Long Term Biosolids Master Plan, Job J40-7 I' Un ii a 1f o1 Iorxl ri ,:,� ! }1 lji fi(a < n oliiill it Y ;fir irin mo1 � u �� � zi �Zn ,• >tl 'i I�i3 ,Jf 1 1 5 y li it 'Iflt tl 11 fli yp ' t. i Cl r rn r •� t� 11iv - ii 14 1$i11:r ry 11n >i� Lui:i1P ' t lx F �l,'��'�xi 1 - �C ,'d'✓' 4 ti �/ b R"ilee�(ICE{1tl11S.7 �5 1. . AI IN •"3 i�, O o N Element 1 ReWew Existing District Dacumentetlon TM 32 44 741 881 181 28 284 � N O Element 2 Identify Vleble Bbsollds Product Markets TM 18 72 50 150 221 24 338 Element 3 Estimate Implementation&Sustainablilty of Product Markets TM 14 48 36 35 112 24 1B8 Element 4 Rank Product Markets TM 16 46 36 15 12 14 139 Element 5 Identify Viable Technolo lea 24 16 24 150 20 24 258 Element 6 Prepare Cost Evalk0bri TM 162 122 192 678 106 56 1316 m m Element 7Prepare Schedule and CIP TM 54 32 BB 18 22 25 237 � r Element 8 Prepare Implementation Testing Plan TM 18 38 32 80 12 29 209 Element 9 Project Workshe ,Meetings&Coordinallon TM 45 196 86 581 0 0 385 Project Report 8 12 281 481 541 40 190 TOTAL 391 6261 6461 13191 2791 2641 3523 0 u FAHR COMMITTEE Meets gDate To Bd.of Dir. 9/IB102 9125102 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number FAHR02-76 14W Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 2002 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 2002. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Long-Term Operating Monies, the District is holding a United Airlines (UAL)Asset Backed Security that carried an acceptable credit rating at the time of purchase. Since that time, the rating from Moody's has fallen twice, first from A3 to BA1, and then to BA3. Likewise, the rating from Standard & Poor's has also fallen twice, first from A-to BBB, and then to BB. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if this security was sold. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of"credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. G:1"p.1.%, nd.lB ,E 1.e .Re" Q003e .Aaenm R¢py15W50Sllem 11111FE45Fv A. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's investment accounts at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown on the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts August 31,2002 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 5,742,124 2.59 Union Bank Checking Account 378,603 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 3.404,000 1.08 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 43,711,784 3.60 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 345,411,404 4.30 Debt Service Reserves w/rmstees 35,799,966 4.62 Petty Cash 5,000 N/A TOTAL i4n44s2aa1 ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:lC GA+DaWI,B ft.d Apen.ReW,.02 B.,d t..Repe,talOWMN NIcLTP SWTEa Page 2 • , , , , , , , iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiimmiiii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. �������������������� ::•x«•r. :•:•:f_:•'•:''�f: {1_1}}:::Ili;:_:y:...rr... }J��•ff • y! .JIXX:J:. 5'"�f:•l r. ,rrrr. :•flll:::::::::• rr:M rrrrr 4YJTlA rr Arr... Sell rVIJ,i} . ::::::::: .�l .l... ;l;i;i:: [A{!�•y� l:•:J: Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund August 31, 2002 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance August 1,2002 $17,942,124 $17,942,124 $17,842,124 2.59 2.59 Withdrawals: 8/72002 (3,400,000) (3,400.000) (3,400,000) 2.59 2.59 8/14/2002 (2,900,000) (2,900,000) (2,900,000) 2.59 2.59 8/212002 (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) 2.59 2.59 8272002 (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) 2.59 2.59 8/282002 (5,400,000) (5,400.000) (5,400,000) Total Withdrawls (12,100,000) (12,100,000) (12,100,000) 2.59 2.59 Balance August 31,2002 $5,742,124 $5,742,124 $6,742,124 2.59 2.59 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING (for the month ended 31 August 2002) Page 1 of 1 Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $44,021,901 • Mellon $43,992,283 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $44,252,887 • Mellon $44,252,420 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.20 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $88 044 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturingwithin 90 days: 69% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0°h 15.1.8 1 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Com liaoce" as 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: I Month: 0.25 0.15 3 Months: 0.50 0.43 12 Months: 2.73 2.12 Year-to-Date: 1.48 1.17 Commentary Inlemslratas dflueshmtend of the yield curve decseamd duringthe month(3-month T-Bills fell 2 basis points to 1.69%),w did longer meturities(30-ye"Tmasuriesfel138 basis poinu to 4.931/6). The Liquid ponfelio outperformed the benchsrask by 10 basis points duringthe moulb,and by31 basis pointsyear4c-0dw. PBdCO's emphasis m highmyieldingsmuriflasuch as mmmemial papermdshaMtemt nmes enhm,mdmums. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ended 31 August 2001) Page 2 of 2 Comoliance Issues: None. Solit Rated Securities Still in Compliance: a $85,000 par of Ford Motor Credit note(345397RS4)6.55%coupon, 9/10/2002 maturity,representing 0.2%of the portfolio holdings-this security was downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+; the issue now carries a Moodys rating of A3 after a further downgrade(from A2)on 1/16/2002. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. c:mproy,xwiwxn�um�ny.ru�Qeeooaxa+rtrrm MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT LNVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING ((or the month ended 31 August 2002) 'Page I of 2 Long-Term Operating Mantes(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $348,629,837 • Mellon $348,570,416 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $336,285,599 • Mellon $336,420,300 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.20 Of Index: 2.28 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact in/loss of 1%Change: $7669 856 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 34% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" N0• 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 0.87 0.85 I Month: 2.93 3.02 3 Months: 6.85 7.41 12 Months: Year-to-Date: 5.55 5.14 • Threcmanth yields declined duringthe month(90-day T-Bills fell 2 basis points to 1.671/6)as did longer maturllies(5-year Treasury Notes fell 23 basis points b 3.22%). • The Long-Term ponfelio outperformed the benchtrark by 2 basis points for the month,and 41 basis points yeazNdate. • Positioning the podfol10 with nearindexduntlat by PIMCO was neutral for performance. • Curve pasitioing was largely positive for performance;a greunribanindex exposure in longer-0aled securities enhanced returns as,these decbned the most. • Mongag,bask:d securities performed well on a duration-adjusted basis,alNwgh the sector experienced immosed volaouty. • M underweigin allocation to conoretas wu negative as this seeWr rebounded this moth. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING (for the month ended 31 August 1002) Page 2 of 2 *Compliance Issues $1,600,000 par of United Airlines Pass-Tbrough 2001-1-C(909317BC2),6.83 1%coupon,9/12008 maturity,representing 0.45%of the portfolio holdings-was purchased on 9/10/2001;and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BA I (on 9/182001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 9202001). The security was further downgraded by Moodys from BAl to BA3 (on 12212001)and by S&P from BBB to BB(on 628/02). The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of split. With respect to the UAL holding,PIMCO's recommendation for the issue bas not changed. They are of the opinion that the spread,collateral,and issuer liquidity all point to continuing to hold the security. The following points provide basis for their recommendation: • foremost,PIMCO doesn't believe that UAL is going bankrupt. Almost all major US airlines have sufficient liquidity and unencumbered assets to survive today's bleak industry conditions. UAL is the second largest carrier in the world,and they believe that the company(and the industry)will survive. • secondly,the collateral is good(very young planes,medium to high aircraft diversification,loan-to-value ratio is 60.75%,em). • PIMCO believes liquidation values,even under the most onerous assumptions,are much higher than reflected in current market prices. Current pricing levels overstate the risks. • If the security was sold at the lowest price currently available(60.67 per MLSPS),the portfolio would realize a loss of$629,280(approximately 18 basis points given the total portfolio value). However,as detailed above,PIMCO believes the fair market value of the issue is much higher than currently reflected in the market This is a conservative loss estimate. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. If anything changes that would prompt them to revise thew recommendation on the inclusion of the security within the portfolio,they will let us know to take appropriate action. Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: •$4,500,000 par of Daimler Chrysler securities(cusip 233835AM9),maturing on December 2002,representing 1.3%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 1 0/3 12 0 01 by S&P from A-to BBB+;and now carry a Moody's rating of A3. The District investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$9,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities(345397GV9,345397RV7,345397SJ3,345397SR5),maturing at various dates in 2003,2004,and 2005,represents 2.6% of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/10001 by S&P from A to BBB+;and now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade (from A2)on 1/162002, The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB in the event of a split rating. •$11,750,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(370425QV5,37042 WE80,37042WZK0),maturing in 2003,represents 3.4%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;and continue to carry a Moodys rating of A2. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A.by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$3,000,060 par of Baltimore Gas&Electric secwities(059165DN7),maturing in 2012,represents 0.9%of the portfolio holdings. The security was downgraded on 7/182002 by S&P from A to BBB+,but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A2. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. G.lwp&alfinl2201wh1relTreasury MgmAL-YU00-02-d8.RPT.doe 4, Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 1 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-AUG-2002 FINAL LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 6,581,709.84 6,591,709.94 14.96% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS- 5,363,993.92 5,363,893.92 12.19% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 6,793,308.00 6,783,309.00 15.42% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 4,199,820.78 4,189,820.79 9.52% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,127,680.09 1,127,680.09 2.56% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 24,046,412.63 24,046,412.63 54.66% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 24,046,412.63 24,046,412.63 54.66% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 6,219,531.25 6,121,860.00 13.92% -97,671.25 U.S.AGENCIES 3,800,599.39 3,773,995.50 8.58% -26,613.89 BANKING&FINANCE 7,077,757.09 7,016,543.86 15.95% -61,213.23 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 2,054,393.40 2,002,900.00 4.55% -51,493.40 UTILITY-GAS 773,227.50 750,082.50 1.71% .23,145.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 19,925,508.63 19,665,371.96 44.70% -260,136.77 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 19,925,508.63 19,665,371.86 44.70% -260,136.77 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 280,498.74 280,498.74 0.64% 0.00 TOTAL 280,498.74 280,498.74 0.64% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 280,498.74 280,498.74 0.64% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 44,252,420.00 43,992,283.23 100.00% -260,136.77 12-Sep-1001 13:47.35 EacutWe Workbench a^ Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE / BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-AUG-2002 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH -45,172.22 45,172.22 -0.01% 0.00 RECEIVABLES 26,919,658.44 26,919,659.44 7.72% 0.00 PAYABLES - -102,562,475.55 -102.562,475.55 -29.42% 0.00 TOTAL -75,687,989.33 -75,687,989.33 -21.71% 0.00 UNITED STATES FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 6,998,638.89 6,998,638.89 2.01% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 60,614,444.33 60,614,444.33 17.39% 0.00 REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 19,800,000.00 19,800,000.00 5.68% 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 6,677.83 6,677.83 0.00% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 184,342.45 184,342.45 0.05% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 87,604,103.50 87,604,103.50 25.13% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 11,916,114.17 11,916,114.17 3.42% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 107,529,339.01 109,920,906.44 31.53% 2,391,567.43 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,189,646.27 34,825,360.78 9.99% 5,635,714.51 U.S.AGENCIES 43,401,956.33 46,103,695.91 13.23% 2,701,739.58 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 25,301,927.08 25,771,540.26 7.39% 469,613.18 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 6,482,597.05 6,595,864.60 1.99% 113,267.55 FHLMC POOLS 1,192,143.13 1,187,883.07 0.34% 4,260.06 FHLMC MULTICLASS 3,691,411.19 3,798,284.36 1.09% 106,873.17 FNMA POOLS 36,499,500.00 36,913,593.75 10.59% 414.093.75 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 3,462,557.73 3,705,792.27 1.06% 243,234.54 ADS:CAR LOAN 355,057.47 350,952.67 0.10% 4,104.90 ABS:AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.00 830,432.00 0.24% -769,568.00 BANKING&FINANCE 30,680,594.50 30,955,962.50 8.88% 275,369.00 INDUSTRIAL 17,266,985.00 17,421,562.00 5.00% 154,577.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 11,627,710.00 12,033,510.00 3.45% 405,800.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 3,063,750.00 3,079,950.00 0.88% 16,200.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 321,345,174.76 333,495,290.61 95.68% 12,150,115.85 12-Sep-2002 I3:48:31 Eremtiw Workbench Q Mellon Trost-Sample Report PAGE: 1 BASE: USA NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-AUG-2002 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-PB(CO % UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINMOSS TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURMES 321,M%171.76 333A95,290.61 95.68% 12,150,115.85 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,159,010.99 3,159,010.88 0,91% 0.00 TOTAL 3,159,010.88 3,159,010.88 0.91% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,159,010M 3,159A18.88 0.91% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 336A20,299.81 348,570AISA6 100.00% 12,150,115.85 12-Sep-1001 13:48.32 Ettcutive W uch YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 1 MBF07511102 2002/00/31 RUN DATE t 09/06/02 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RON TINE t 10.53.01 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY SANEST TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOS YIELD S-P PRICE ERNEET VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH A CASE EQUIVALENTS 1,127,600.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CABS HURT .000 1.701 AAA 100.000 1,127,690.09 4.69 996085247 AAA 1,127,600.09 2.59 2,900,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN MTG CORP DISC 1.643 .000 P-1 99.036 2,095,244.00 12.04 313391F63 NAT 09/13/2002 A-1+ 2,895,244.00 6.62 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL ROME LE MTG CORP DISC 1.654 .000 P-1 99.115 1,496,631.25 6.22 313391311 HAT 10/08/2002 A-1+ 1,496,631.25 3.42 2,200,000.00 PEDERAL ROM LN SR CONS DISC N 1.663 .000 P-1 99.911 2,195,840.78 9.13 31330SG34 MAT 09/18/20D2 A-1+ 2,195,040.70 5.02 5,800,000.00 FEDERAL RAIL MTO ASSN DISCOUNT 1.695 .000 P-1 99.110 5,786,652.44 24.06 313SO9922 NAT 09/25/2002 A-1+ 5,796,652.44 13.24 1,500,000.00 MERLE A CO INC DISC 1.712 .000 99.895 1,498,432.50 6.23 589338JC3 09/12/2002 1,498,432.50 3.43 200,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 1.723 .000 P-1 99.799 798,394.67 3.32 26354BR43 10/04/2002 798,394.67 1.83 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL ROTA LN BE CONS DISC N 1.725 .000 P-1 99.699 1,993,900.00 8.29 313385G59 MAT 09/20/2002 A-1+ 1,993,900.00 4.56 975,000.00 FEDERAL RUNS US HTG CORD DISC 1.725 .000 P-1 99.694 972,018.61 4.04 3133911338 MAT 09/26/2002 A-1+ 972,016.67 2.22 1,000,000.00 PEDERAL NAIL SIG ASSN DISCOUNT 1.726 .000 P-1 99.666 996,655.56 4.14 313589R41 SAT 11/06/2002 A-1+ 996,655.56 2.28 1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 1.753 .000 P-1 99.825 998,250.00 4.15 63743VJSI 09/26/2002 998,250.00 2.20 1,500,000.00 SHERIDAN HE CR CP DISC 1.766 .000 99.658 1,494,866.61 6.21 0258153JI 09/10/2002 1,494,866.67 3.42 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 MSM7511102 2002/08/31 RUN DATE 09/06/02 DISMIC9:W LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 10.53.01 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ________-_ 1,800,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 1.798 .000 P-1 99.543 1,791,766.00 7.45 07588SJ53 09/05/2002 1,791,766.00 4.10 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASE 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 1.553 .134 24,046,412.63 100.00 24,046,412.63 55.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES COMP NORTH SR MT .000 2.008 RA1 99.903 1,502,520.00 7.62 046003KEI FLTG AT 05/00/2003 DO 05/08/00 M- 1,499,745.00 3.43 125,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MIN .000 1.919 AAA 100.070 124,960.94 .63 3136FOYN6 VAR AT 02/21/2003 DO 00/21/01 AAA 125,097.50 .29 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LE OR CONS ADS 1.714 6.318 AAA 100.906 1,519,035.00 7.69 3333MCM5 6.3759 11/15/2002 DO 11/08/00 AM 1,513,590.00 3.46 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN RAN CONS BD 1.945 5.825 AAA 100.250 1,013,050.00 5.09 3133HO200 5.840% 09/25/2002 DO 03/25/99 AAA 1,002,500.00 2.29 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO NT 2.949 6.969 MI 103.309 560,601.00 2.83 949740CUS 7.2001 05/01/2003 DO 04/26/00 A+ 557,668.60 1.20 600,000.00 BEM STEARNS CO UNSUB 2.048 6.099 A2 101.673 615,904.00 3.10 073902BJ6 6.2001 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/90 A 610,030.00 1.40 200,000.00 FED PRAM CR BR CONS SYS HTN 2.118 4.906 AAA 100.286 203,994.00 1.01 3133IU44 4.620% 10/07/2002 DD 10/07/98 AAA 200,572.00 .46 165,000.00 MARC ONE MILE NA SUB NTS 2.118 6.460 M3 102.550 170,072.10 .86 064216M2 6.625% 04/15/2003 DO 04/15/93 A 169,207.50 .39 400,000.00 BOATMEN BMCSHAMS INC SOB 2.260 6.590 M3 102.426 411,460.00 2.00 096650MG 6.7501 03/IS/2003 DO 03/15/93 A 409,704.00 .94 610,000.00 FEDERAL MOIL M OR CONS BDB 2.270 S.063 AM 101.219 622,102.40 3.13 3133MCUE3 5.1251 01/13/2003 DO 01/12/01 AM 617,435.90 1.41 195,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN BR CONS ADS 2.270 5.582 AM 101.406 199,594.20 1.00 3133M2A56 5.660% 01/13/2003 DO 01/13/96 AM 197,741.70 .45 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSFO3511102 2002/08/31 RON DATE 09/06/02 DISTRICT! LIQUID OPERATING RON TIME t 10.53.01 PM VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY M MJVT TOTAL COST/ 8 TV" SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD B-P PRICE NARRBT VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ___------- 100,000.00 PEDCRAL NONE: LN BE CONE BOB 2.296 5.527 AM 101.500 102,392.00 .51 3133M2303 5.6101 01/23/2003 DD O1123198 AAA 101,500.00 .23 500,000.00 NEMILL LYNCH 6 CO BONDS 2.351 5.907 M3 101.570 508,160.00 2.50 S9018BB94 6.000% 02/12/2003 DO 02/12/98 M- 507,890.00 1.16 324,000.00 BANNANORICA CORP NOB BY 2.372 6.654 M3 103.324 336,312.00 1.30 066050BS7 6.635% 06/01/2003 DD 06/O1/93 A 334,769.76 .37 11000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP OR HTB 2.500 3.536 A2 101.181 1,028,630.00 5.14 441012=4 7.625% 01/15/2003 DD 01/14/93 A 1,011,810.00 2.31 6,000,000.00 U e TREASURY ROTES 2.522 6.126 AAA 102.031 6,219,531.25 31.13 912821J7B 06.2501 02/15/2003 DD 02/15/93 AAA 6,121,960.00 14.01 250,000.00 DONALDSON LUMIN 4TR 00039E 2.614 6.968 AA3 101.468 257,995.00 1.28 25766CBQ6 J.OJOB 22/19/2002 DD 12/13/19 RA- 253,670.00 .58 600,000.00 MEN SYNEMS COB INC 2.62B 6.596 A2 102.338 620,292.00 3.12 073902MI 6.350% 04/15/2003 A 614,029.00 1.40 193,000.00 PITMEY SCHES CA CORP HE 2.723 2.557 M3 302.840 203,794.49 1.00 724433M0 9.800% 02/15/2003 DD 02/12/91 M 198,481.20 .45 15,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN ME CONS BD 2.751 5.708 AAA 103.656 15,470.85 .03 3133H4VC4 6.0001 07/14/2003 DD O7114/9B AM 15,549.40 .04 1,000,000.00 PUBLIC SW CO OF CO 3.046 6.104 A3 98.290 1,022,640.00 4.99 74444BB19 6.000% 04/15/2003 DO 04/20/98 DUS+ 992,900.00 2.25 150,000.00 HERRILL LYNCH 3.107 6.741 M3 101.999 155,247.00 .73 590188EP9 6.8751 03/01/2003 M- 152,983.50 .35 200,000.00 DEAN BITTER DISCOVER 6 CO 3.144 6.74B M3 101.887 206,866.00 1.03 24240VKS 6.075% 03/01/2003 M- 203,334.00 .47 400,000.00 MATORAL RURAL VITLB COOP FIR 3.240 7.238 Al 101.894 413,064.00 2.O7 637432CK9 3.3751 02/10/2003 DO 02/10/00 A. 403,536.00 .93 1,020,000.00 NIADARA MOHANK PKR CORD ST 4.133 5.975 BAA2 100.000 1,031,753.40 5.18 653522CQ3 5.8351 09/01/2002 DD 09/01/14 A4 11020,000.00 2.33 05,000.00 YORD HYR CR CO HTB 4.319 6.550 A3 99.998 86,759.50 .43 345397M4 6.5501 09/10/2002 DO 09/10/97 BBB. 04,998.30 .19 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 4 OCSF07511102 2002/08/31 RUN DATE t 09/06/02 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RON TINE 10.53.01 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NODDY RABBET TOTAL C0ST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 6-P PRICE RABBET VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 750,000.00 PUBLIC SVC ELEC GAS 4TR 00008 4.398 7.199 A3 100.011 773,227.50 3.01 74456QAN9 7.900% 09/06/2002 DO 09/06/00 A- 750.O02.S0 1.72 ________ _______ ----------------- _________ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1.945 5.592 19,925,500.63 100.00 19,665,371.86 44.99 TOTAL 1.791 3.448 43,972,921.26 100.00 43,711,784.49 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD AM ITS PAGE t 5 MSM7522202 2002/08/31 RUN DATE t 09/06/02 DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE t 10.53.01 PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT MOODY SANEST TOTAL COST/ A TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE HONEST VALUB 6 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASE 6 CABS EQUIVALENTS 43,000,000.00 FEDERAL DOW LN BE CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.980 42,991,400.00 49.07 313385E44 MAT 09/03/2002 A-1+ 42,991,400.00 10.21 17,700,000.00 FEDERAL SOME LM BE CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.565 17,623,044.33 20.11 31338SK70 SAT 10/16/2002 A-14 17,623,044.33 4.19 7,000,000.00 FEDERAL SOON LN MG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.901 6,998,630.89 7.98 313397E49 HAT 09/03/2002 A-14 6,998,638.99 1.66 19,000,000.00 LEHEAN BROTRARB OEM .000 1.820 100.000 19,800,000.00 22.60 99396A622 01.820% 09/03/2002 DO 00/30/02 19,800,000.00 4.70 104,342.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 1.701 AAA 100.000 104,342.45 .21 996085247 AAA 104,342.45 .04 6,677.83 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT .000 .100 100.000 6,677.83 .00 996087094 6,677.83 .00 ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 .251 87,604,103.50 100.00 87,604,103.50 20.90 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PON PENA OF NTO .000 5.303 AAA 102.172 6,090,000.00 1.83 01POS2490 5.5008 09/01/2017 DO 09/01/02 AAA 6,130,312.50 1.46 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR MMA SP MTG .000 5.019 AAA 103.109 6,178,225.00 1.05 0IF0604AG 6.000% 10/01/2017 DO 10/01/02 AAA 6,186,562.50 1.47 9,000,000.00 CONNIT TO PUN PHRA SF MTG .000 5.804 AAA 103.375 9,240,750.00 2.78 01F060493 6.000% 09/01/2017 DD 09/01/02 AAA 5,303,750.00 2.21 15,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PON FMMA SF HTD .D00 5.895 AAA 101.953 14,990,625.00 4.58 U1F060691 6.000% 09/01/2032 DO 09/01/02 AAA 15,292,968.75 3.63 15,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR OEM SF MTG .000 6.290 AAA 103.375 15,492,107.50 4.64 OIND626M 6.500% 10/15/2032 DD 10/01/02 AAA 15,506,250.00 3.68 9DO,000.00 BEAR STEARNS ME 6 TR 00459 .000 2.045 A2 100.140 699,406.00 .27 07392SVC4 PLTS RT 12/01/2003 OD 08/17/01 A 901,260.00 .21 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 MSF07522202 2002/08/31 RUN DATE 09/06/02 DISTRICT, LONG-TERM OPERATING RON TIME , 10.53.01 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOS YIELD S-P PRICE MOUNT VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PON GHMA II "URGE .000 7.269 AAA 103.172 1,264,SOO.00 .37 21HD72692 7.500% 09/20/2032 DD 09/01/02 AAA 1,238,062.50 .29 4,500,000.00 DAINLER CHRYSLER NA CORE HT .000 2.653 Al 100.156 4,491,345.00 1.35 233835AM9 MIR RT 12/16/2602 DD 12/15/00 NR 4,507,020.00 1.07 548,507.16 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 .000 5.697 102.517 559,991.54 .16 25475HAD6 5.040% 10/17/2011 DD 03/18/99 562,313.09 .13 374,509.73 FHLNC GROUP 4G4-0353 .000 7.201 AAA 101.609 303,909.50 .11 312808HA2 7.500% 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 AAA 380,535.59 .09 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONE BOB .000 6.437 ARE 110.688 7,997,625.00 2.40 3133HRUN7 7.125% 02/15/2005 DO 02/08/00 AAA 8,301,600.00 1.97 125,712.45 FNLNC GROUP 678-6064 .000 6.161 AAA 102.906 122,648.22 .03 313488WE3 6.3844 01/01/2029 DD 12/01/97 ARE 129,365.65 .03 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL BIG BUSH DEES .000 4.892 HAS 107.313 11,521,271.50 3.65 31359MIY2 5.250% 06/15/2006 DO 06/22/01 AAA 12,180,025.50 2.89 3,499,999.57 GUNK POOL #0569358 .000 6.257 AAA 103.876 3,582,030.01 1.09 3620000E3 6.5008 04/15/2032 DD 04/01/02 AAA 3,635,672.15 .86 545,128.22 GUM II POOL #0000395 .000 4.456 ARE 100.904 540,188.00 .16 36325CHM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 AAA 550,492.20 .13 4,733,076.99 OHM II POOL 409040BY .000 4.456 AAA 100.904 4,605,006.67 1.43 36225CN29 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 4,779,650.47 1.14 3,000,000.00 GTE NORM INC DEB HER A .ODO 5.844 AS 102.565 3,063,750.00 .92 362337AD9 6.000% 01/15/2004 DD 01/15/94 A4 3,079,950.00 .73 4,000,000.00 GENERAL HIRE ACCEP HTN 400615 .000 2.170 A2 98.734 3,996,440.00 1.16 37042=80 PLTG RT 08/04/2003 DD 00/03/01 BBB 3,949,360.00 .94 4,000,000.00 NABISCO ISO NTH .000 6.045 A2 101.316 4,081,440.00 1.21 629527CAS VAR RT 02/01/2033 DO 01/22/98 A 4,052,640.00 .96 5,000,000.00 PHILIP SOURIS COS INC ME .000 7.055 A2 106.314 5,263,000.00 1.59 718154CES 7.500% 04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 A- 5,315,700.00 1.26 345,445.66 PREMIER AM TR 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.329 AAA 101.593 355,057.47 .10 74046RFN6 6.430% 03/08/2004 DO 06/21/99 350,952.67 .08 e • YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7 OCSF07542202 2002/00/31 RUN DATE 09/06/02 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RON TIME 10.53.01 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET Tom COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 8-P PRICE MESSY VALVE ! TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ---- - --- -------- ------------ -_-------- 4,029,964.01 SBA GM MY PEKIN 2001-20C 1 .000 5.041 AAA 109.535 4,029,964.01 1.31 83162CWD 6.340E 03/01/2021 AAA 4,373,921.44 1.04 2,902,566.19 SEA GM PARTS CT,F9 BBIC-PS O1 .000 6.132 AAA 108.300 2,902,566.19 .94 83164IDD4 6.640E 02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 SR 3,143,479.18 .75 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS MEETING 01-1 C .000 13.161 B3 51.902 1,600,000.00 .24 909317BC2 6.831E 09/01/2008 DO O0/22/01 A- 830,432.00 .20 20,000,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTES .000 5.526 AAA 113.094 22,620,312.50 6.78 9128272J0 06.250E 02/15/2007 DO 02/15/97 AAA 22,618,800.00 5.37 6,252,501.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT .000 3.521 AAA 120.063 6,265,6BB.71 2.06 9120274Y5 3.075E 01/15/2009 DO O1/15/99 AAA 6,881,690.18 1.63 74,500,000.00 U E TREASURY NOTES .000 6.064 AAA 121.313 00,879,062.50 24.06 9128276D9 06.750E 05/15/2005 DO 05/15/00 AAA 82,920,105.00 19.69 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA BLEC 6 PER O1 PER A .000 5.475 A3 105.026 3,407,680.00 1.10 927404EN0 5.750E 03/31/2006 DO 03/27/01 A- 3,675,910.00 .07 26,115,580.OD UB TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY 3.817 3.154 AAA 107.000 22,923,957.56 8.37 9128272M3 3.375E 01/15/2007 DO O2/15/97 AAA 27,943,670.60 6.64 1,400,000.00 BEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP SIR 5.261 6.415 ml 101.953 1,430,920.00 .42 612400GN6 6.540E 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,427,342.00 .34 3,950,000.00 GNAC NIS 5.752 1.076 A2 99.039 3,910,768.50 1.17 370425WS VAR AT 08/18/2003 DD 09/17/90 BBB+ 3,912,040.50 .93 2,000,000.00 EASTERN TR NY COST GLOBAL HT 5.881 1.045 Al 99.864 1,992,800.00 .59 066365DN4 FLTO AT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/96 A 1,997,280.00 .47 15,500,000.OD FEDERAL NAIL MTG ABEN USES 5.967 6.426 AAA 110.075 16,154,410.00 5.25 31359MFE1 7.125E 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 17,185,625.00 4.08 3,000,OOD.00 BALTIMORE GAS 6 ELEC CO 6.011 6.678 A2 101.079 3,030,250.00 .90 059165DN7 6.750E 12/15/2002 DD 12/20/00 BBE+ 3,032,340.00 .72 3,800,000.00 GENERAL ME ACCEP ETR 00562 6.303 1.921 A2 99.453 3,753,950.00 1.13 37042MKO VAR AT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 BBB+ 3,779,214.00 .90 1,608,724.00 FBLMC MULTICLASS HIS 6ER E3 A 6.316 4.459 AAA 103.553 1,690,523.19 .52 3133WR95 VAR AT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97 AAA 1,748,724.36 .42 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 8 MSP07522202 2002/08/31 RUN DATE 09/06/02 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 10.53.01 PAR VALUE 'YTM AT CURRENT NODDY MARKET TOTAL COST/ R TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE R TOTAL _________________ ---------------------------- ------- ------- _______ -------- ------------ __________ 1,340,720.24 GNMA GTD RBNIC M 2000-9 M 6.320 2.270 AAA 100.441 1,340,720.24 .40 3837B4NY9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,346,632.92 .32 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEAMS COS INC 6.330 6.596 A2 102.338 2,031,960.00 .61 073902MI 6.750% 04/15/2063 A 2,046,760.00 .49 3,000,000.00 PORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL L DN 6.350 2.105 A3 98.656 3,000,000.00 .88 345397M VM RT 03/17/2003 DD 03/16/00 RRB. 2,959,680.00 .70 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR M CO GLOBAL NTS 6.351 1.901 A3 98.750 1,992,580.00 .59 345397RW PLTO RT 02/13/2003 DD 02/13/98 BBB. 1,975,000.00 .47 20,093.09 GNMA POOL #0500917 6.389 5.022 AAA 103.06E 19,072.74 .00 36210SPAO 6.000E 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 20,700.34 .00 58,790.10 GMMA POOL #0506636 6.389 5.822 AAA 103.092 55,812.33 .01 3622OW90 6.0001 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 60,598.58 .01 735,682.72 GNMA POOL 605D3388 6.309 5.022 AAA 103.062 698,323.03 .22 36210VP55 6.0001 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99 AAA 758,209.32 .10 24,299.42 GNMA POOL 90499153 6.399 3.822 AM 103.062 23,065.46 .00 362100QE5 6.000% 02/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 25,043.47 .01 5,984.59 GNMA POOL #0496284 6.390 5.818 AAA 103.124 5,680.69 .00 36210M351 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 02/01/99 AAA 6,271.55 .00 707,051.87 GNMA POOL /0496461 6.390 5.B1B AM 103.124 747,084.38 .24 36210M M4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 011,639.37 .19 214,105.13 GNMA POOL /0491103 6.390 5.818 AAA 103.124 203,232.61 .06 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 AAA 220,793.77 .05 19,014.29 GUM PODL #0406720 6.390 5.818 AAA 103.124 18,040.71 .00 36210AVM6 6.0001 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AAA 19,608.29 .00 39,804.95 GNMA PODL #0497343 6.390 5.818 AAA 103.124 32,783.6E .01 36210NP45 6.000% 12/15/2020 DD 12/01/98 AAA 41,048.46 .01 36,285.49 GNMA POOL #0469608 6.391 5.818 AM 103.124 34,442.88 .01 36209EMS 6.0008 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/98 AAA 37,419.05 .01 43,744.28 GUM POOL #0467279 6.391 5.818 AAA 103.124 41,522.90 .01 36209CCQ7 6.0006 10/15/2020 DD 10/01/98 AM 45,110.85 .01 a YLUANAL YlRLO ANALYSIS PAGE t 9 O SF09522202 2D02/08/31 RUE DATE t 09/06/02 DISTRICT, LONG-T8M OPEMTING RUN TINE t 10.53.01 PAR VALUE 'YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MUST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIBLD B-P PRICE NAERET VALUE B TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 73,605.64 GNM POOL 40457814 6.391 5.010 AAA 103.124 69,867.85 .02 36208QSB3 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/O1/98 AM 15,905.D8 .02 680,936.09 GNM POOL #0467266 6.391 5.910 AM 103.124 646,262.40 .21 36209CCR2 6.000% 10/15/2620 DD 10/01/90 AM 702,105.41 .17 78S,333.28 GNM POOL #0465555 6.392 5.010 AM 103.124 745,453.08 .24 36209M40 6.000% 09/15/2029 DO 09/01/98 AM 809,067.09 .19 32,167.63 GNM POOL /0483452 6.392 5.816 AM 103.124 30,534.11 .00 36209EBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 09/01/98 AM 33,172.55 .01 815,839.81 GNNA POOL #0465546 6.392 5.818 AM 103.124 II4,410.44 .25 36209ABT3 6.000% 08/15/2026 DO 08/01/98 AM 841,326.65 .20 781,015.17 ONES POOL 40468339 6.392 5.818 AM 103.124 741,354.26 .24 36209DR00 6.000% 08/15/2028 DO 08/01/98 AM 805,414.09 .19 40,943.13 GNM POOL #0438057 6.393 5.818 AAA 103.124 30,863.99 .01 3620IPTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/90 AAA 42,222.19 .01 34,125.43 0EM POOL #0468330 6.393 5.818 AM 103.124 32,392.49 .01 36209DBF4 6.000% 05/15/2028 DO OS101/98 AM 35,191.51 .01 2,000,000.00 FSLEC EOLTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.343 AAA 102.47E 2,000,888.06 .61 3133MW2 6.5001 09/25/2018 AM 2,049,560.00 .49 2,785,610.71 FMNC NULTICLASS CTF SSE 16208 6.499 5.822 AAA 103.050 2,629,470.77 .86 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 MA 2,870,571.94 .60 1,000,000.00 SALOEOE BE BLDGB ETE 6.625 2.076 M1 100.093 1,000,000.00 .30 7954BEEES VM RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/28/00 M- 1,000,930.00 .24 674,933.86 FBIM GROUP IGS-0476 6.620 6.969 AM 100.451 685,505.41 .20 - 3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 AM 677,981.83 .16 742,300.12 SNM II POOL IOBOOBBN 6.705 5.261 AAA 102.172 750,537.93 .22 36225CC20 7.375% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 AM 758,422.80 .18 2,000,000.00 HARSH 5 NCUMAN COB INC SR NT 6.717 6.253 A2 105.943 1,992,280.00 .63 571740MO 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 M- 2,110,860.00 .SO 3,000,000.00 FORD NTR CR CO GLUBM LANDNAM 6.739 6.669 A3 100.469 2,955,080.00 .90 345391SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/95 BBB+ 3,014,070.00 .72 YI.DANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 10 OCBF07522202 2002/08/31 RUN DATE t 09/06/02 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIMB 10.53.01 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 9 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE A TOTAL 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOW LEE INC NT 6.866 6.498 A3 105.582 2,498,400.00 .79 22237UMS 6.BSOB 06/15/2004 DD 06/24/99 A 2,639r550.00 .63 490,736.61 OEM II POOL /0000023 6.952 6.409 ARE 103.375 498,864.45 .15 36225CAE9 VAR AT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 ARE 507,298.97 .12 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG ASSN DAM Y.113 5.189 AAA 114.438 2,030,133.00 .72 313591EY5 6.625% 09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 AAA 2,403,199.00 .57 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO On 7.512 7.863 BARS 104.207 2,151,250.00 .62 542671CT7 8.200E 03/15/2023 DD 03/29/93 A- 2,085,140.00 .50 803,246.80 GREYBTONE BVCNG CORE FBA 495-1 7.514 7.379 AAA 100.696 791,511.85 .24 39A I.#A44 7 .4306 06/01/2003 DO 02/29/00 AAA BOB,840.61 .19 1,000,000.00 PORD MOTOR CR CO AT 7.582 6.732 A3 100.269 965,170.00 .30 345397GV9 6.750% OS/15/2005 DD 05/24/93 no. 1,002,690.00 .24 957,612.10 WSP/SUNTOON PRIDE 0000-11150 7.694 7.131 AAA 105.179 936,813.97 .30 302996GE3 7.500E 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 1,007,202.14 .24 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD ME 4TR 00115 7.709 6.760 A2 107.984 2,950,530.00 .97 69512EEUS 7.300% 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,239,520.00 .11 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NY 3.967 3.086 Al 111.133 1,594,032.00 .53 020002AL5 7.8751 05/01/2005 DO 05/01/00 A. 1,718,128.00 .42 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCONS SECURITIES 1.071 5.401 321,345,174.76 100.00 333,495,290.61 79.18 TDT'AL 1.044 5.271 400,949,278.26 100.00 421,099,394.11 100.00 e •� 4, Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE) AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 824,858.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Aug-2002 -824,858.52 996085247 01-Aug-2002 824,858.52 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 824,858.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Aug-2002 -824.958.52 996085247 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53,022.74 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Aug-2002 -53,022.74 996087094 01-Aug-2002 53,022.74 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,447,778.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Aug-2002 -1,447,779.76 996085247 01-Aug-2002 1,447,778.76 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,447,778.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Aug-2002 -1,447,778.76 996085247 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,678.39 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Aug-2002 4,678.39 996087094 01-Aug-2002 4,678.39 B 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50:16 &emli.Wwkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGo0010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Aug-2002 -54,000,000.00 99394ZO58 01.740%08/02/2002 DD 081011 01-Aug-2002 54,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Aug-2002 -54,000,000.00 99394ZO58 01.740%09/02/2002 DD OR/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,004,678.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Aug-2002 -1,004,678.39 996085247 02-Aug-2002 1,004,679.39 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,004,678.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Aug-2002 4L004,678.39 996085247 02-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 02-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Aug-2002 -54,900,000.00 99395AI28 01.690%08/05/2002 DD 08/021 02-Aug-2002 54,900,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Aug-2002 54,900,000.00 99395AI28 01.680%08/05/2002 DD 08/021 02-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 02-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 47,828,67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Aug-2002 -47,828.67 996085247 05-Aug-2002 47,828.67 B 0.00 12-Sep-1001 13:50.16 Executive Workbench a Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 47,828.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Aug-2002 47,828.67 996085247 05-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 05-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,186.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Aug-2002 -30,186.00 996085247 05-Aug-2002 30,186.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,186.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Aug-2002 -30,186.00 996085247 05-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 05-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Aug-2002 .3,791,171.33 3135891122 MAT 09/25/2002 05-Aug-2002 3,791,171.33 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Aug-2002 -3,791,171.33 3135891-122 MAT 09/25/2002 05-Aug-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 05-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Aug-2002 27,900,000.00 99395A953 01.740%08/06/2002 DD 08/05/ 05-Aug-2002 27,900,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Aug-2002 -27,900,000.00 9939SA953 01.740%08/062002 DD 08/051 05-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 05-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-1001 13:50:16 &ecutiw WwkbencA Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG00o10000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-COMSOLIDATED SHAMIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 05-Aug-2002 -27,000,000.00 99395BO35 01.730%08/06/2002 DD 08/05/ 05-Aug-2002 27,000,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 05-Aug-2002 -27,000,000.00 99395BO35 01.730%0&/062002 DO 081051 05-Aug-2002 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 05-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,000,000.00 LERMAN BROTHERS REPO 06-Aug-2002 -55,000,000.00 99395C462 01.760%08/072002 DO 08/06/ 06-Aug-2002 55,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 06-Aug-2002 -55,000,000.00 99395C462 01.760%08/072002 DO 08/0& 06-Aug-20G2 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 06-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,901.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Aug-2002 -2,901.39 996095247 07-Aug-2002 2,901.39 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,901.39 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Aug-2002 -2,901.39 996085247 07-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,518.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Au9-2002 4,518.89 996085247 07-Aug-2002 4,518.89 B 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50:16 E..Iiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcSGoOol0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,518.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Aug-2002 -4,518.89 996085247 07-Aug-2002 0.00 FC - 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Aug-2002 -1,995,481.11 3135891122 MAT 09/25/2002 07-Aug-2002 1,995,481.11 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-Aug-2002 -4,499,787.50 313385B21 MAT 08/0&2002 07-Aug-2002 4,499,787.50 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Aug-2002 -1,995,481.11 313589H22 MAT 09/25/2002 07-Aug-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-Aug-2002 4,499,787.50 313385B21 MAT 08/082002 07-Aug-2002 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 07-Aug-2002 2,195,940.78 31338SG34 MAT 09/182002 08-Aug-2002 2,195,840.78 B SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-Aug-2002 -2,195,840.78 313385G34 MAT 09/182002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 08-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep2002 13:50:16 EM�.liw Wwkbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 68,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Aug-2002 -68,000,000.00 99393D916 01.750%09/092002 DO 08/07/ 07-Aug-2002 68,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 68,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Aug-2002 -68,000,000.00 99395D916 01.750%09/082002 DD 08/07/ 07-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,541,737.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Aug-2002 4,541,737.56 996095247 08-Aug-2002 4,541,737,56 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,541,737.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Aug-2002 4,541,737.56 996085247 08-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 09-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 08-Aug-2002 -699,504.17 5007MIHPI 08232002 08-Aug-2002 699,504,17 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 08-Aug-2002 699,504.17 5007MIHPI 08232002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 08-Aug-2002 -2,995,244.00 313397F63 MAT 09/132002 08-Aug-2002 2,895,244.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 11-Sep-1001 13:50.16 Executive Wwkbexh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ED TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DES 08-Aug-2002 -2,895,244.00 31339TF63 MAT 09/13/2002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 08-Aug-2002 -69,500,000.00 99395E682 01.730%08/09/2002 DO 08/08/ 08-Aug-2002 69,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 08-Aug-2002 -69,500,000.00 99395E682 01.730%08/092002 DO 09/08/ 08-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEEEMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 205,153.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Aug-2002 -205,153.71 996085247 09-Aug-2002 205,153.71 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 205,153.71 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-Aug-2002 -205,153.71 996085247 09-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 09-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Aug-2002 69,300,000.00 99395F978 01.660%08/122002 DD 08/091 09-Aug-2002 69,300,000.00 B LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Aug-2002 -69,300,000.00 99395F979 01.660%08/122002 DO 08/09/ 09-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 09-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep1001 13:50:16 Ezeeuthe WmkbeKh Q Mellon Traet-Sample Re rt PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHAREWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 614,750.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 12-Aug-2002 -614,750.00 996085247 12-Aug-2002 614,750.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 614,750.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Aug-2002 -614,750.00 996085247 12-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 12-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,564,475.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Aug-2002 -15,564,475.84 996085247 12-Aug-2002 15,564,475.84 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,564,475.84 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Aug-2002 -15,564,475.84 996085247 12-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 12-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PRACO 53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12-Aug-2002 -53,90000.00 99395G968 01.730%08/132002 DD 08/121 12-Aug-2002 53,900,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12-Aug-2002 53,900,000.00 99395G968 01.730%09/132002 DD 09/121 12-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 12-Aug4002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 17,250.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Aug-2002 -17,230.00 996085247 13-Aug-2002 17,250.00 B 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50:16 Exe fiw Wmkbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re rt PACE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 17,250.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Aug-2002 -17,250.00 996085247 13-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 13-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,016.86 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Aug-2002 -13,016.86 996085247 13-Aug-2002 13,016.86 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,016.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Aug-2002 -13,016.86 9%085247 13-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 13-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 13-Aug-2002 -53.900,000.00 99395J293 01.690%0&14/2002 DO 091131 13-Aug-2002 53,900,000.00 B LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 13-Aug-2002 -53,900,000.00 99395J293 01.690%08/14/2002 DO 08/13/ 13-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 501,274.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Aug-2002 -501,274.85 996085247 14-Aug-2002 501,274.85 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 501,274.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Aug-2002 -501,274.85 996085247 14-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 14-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep1001 /3:50:16 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFJ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFJ COST/ TRANS CODE BROHER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 19,717.81 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT' 14-Aug-2002 -19,717.81 996085247 14-Aug-2002 19,717.81 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,717.81 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Aug-2002 -19,717.81 996085247 14-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 14-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-Aug-2002 -54,000,000.00 99395K597 01.690Ye08/15/20m DO 08/141 14-Aug-2002 54,000,000.00 B LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO I4-Aug-2002 -54,000,000.00 99395K597 01.690Ye 09/15/2D02 DO 08/14/ 14-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 14-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,091,911.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Aug-2002 -1,091,911.06 996035247 15-Aug-2002 1,091,911.06 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,091,911.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Aug-2002 1,091,911.06 996085247 15-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,383,404.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Aug-2002 -1,393,404.66 996085247 15-Aug-2002 1,393,404.66 B 0.00 12Sep-2002 13:50.16 Ereeultee W6rkbexh ' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATEO SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,383,404.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Aug-2002 4,383,404.66 996095247 15-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 15-Aug-2002 -54,000,000.00 99395MO99 01.820%08/162002 DO 08/151 15-Aug-2002 54,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 15-Aug-2002 -54,000,000.00 99395MO98 01.820%09/162002 DO 081151 15-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO I6-Aug-2002 -68,000,000-00 99395N401 01.750%09/192002 DO 08/16/ 16-Aug-2002 68,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS WC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 68,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 16-Aug-2002 -68,000,000.00 99395N401 01.750%OS/I92002 DO 08/161 16-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,487,141.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Aug-20D2 -12,497,141.43 996085247 19-Aug-2002 12,497,141.43 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,487,141.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Aug-2002 -12,487,141.43 996085247 19-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 19-Aug-2002 0.00 11-Sep-1002 13:50.16 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 19-Aug-2002 -55,700,000.00 9939SP299 01.720°/a0820/2002 DO 08/19/ 19-Aug-2002 55,700,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 19-Aug-2002 -55,700,000.00 99395P299 01.720%08202002 DO 08119/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,642.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Aug-2002 -40,642.89 996085247 20-Aug-2002 40,642.89 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,642.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Aug-2002 40,642.89 996085247 20-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,057.31 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCI 20-Aug-2002 -20,057.31 996087094 20-Aug-2002 20,057.31 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 20-Aug-2002 1,496,631.25 313397/77 MAT 10/082002 20-Aug-2002 1,496,631.25 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 20-Aug-20O2 -1,496,631.25 313397J77 MAT 10/082002 20-Aug-2002 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 20-Aug-2002 0.00 12Sep-2002 13:50:16 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re orl PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Aug-2002 -55,900,000.00 99395Q735 01.690Ye08/21/2002 DD 0820/ 20-Aug-2002 55,900,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Aug-2002 -55,900,000.00 99395Q735 01.690%0821/2002 DD O820/ 20-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 20-Au9-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO 1,500,000.00 MERCK&CO INC DISC 20-Aug-2002 -1,499,432.50 58933SJC3 09/122002 21-Aug-2002 1,498,432.50 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 MERCK&CO INC DISC 20-Aug-2002 -1,499,432.50 58933SJC3 09/12/2002 21-Aug-2002 0.00 PC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21-Aug-2002 -998,250.00 63743DJSI 0926t2002 21-Aug-2002 998,250.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 21-Aug-2002 -998,250.00 63743DJSI 09262002 21-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Aug-2002 -69,600,000t0 99395S103 01.700%08222002 DD 08211 21-Aug-2002 69,600,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 11Sep-1002 13:50.'16 Encutim Wwkbewh Q [--Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Aug-2002 -69,600,000.00 99395S103 01.700%08/222002 DO 08/2It 21-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,200,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 22-Aug-2002 -69,200,000.00 99395T333 01.740-A 08/23/2002 DO 0822/ 22-Aug-2002 69,200,000.00 B LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,200,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 22-Aug-2002 -69,200,000.00 993957333 01.740%08232002 DO 0822/ 22-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-Aug-2002 -69,500.000.00 99395U686 01.660^/e 08/262002 DD 08231 23-Aug-2002 69,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 23-Aug-2002 -798,394.67 26354BK43 10/042002 23-Aug-2002 798,394.67 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-Aug-2002 -69,500,000.00 99395U686 01.660%08/262002 DO 0823/ 23-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 23-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 23-Aug-2002 -798,394.67 26354BK43 10/042002 23-Aug-2002 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 23-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sap-2002 13:50.16 E:eculim WoFkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: IS PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETFL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,520,447.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Aug-2002 -1,520,447.50 996085247 26-Aug-2002 1,520,447.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,520,447.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Aug-2002 -1,520,447.50 996035247 26-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 26-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 68,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-Aug-2002 -68,000,000.00 99395V577 01.720%09/27/2002 DO 08261 26-Aug-2002 68,000,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 68,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-Aug-2002 -68,000,000.00 99395V577 01.720%09272002 DO 08/261 26-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 26-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 27-Aug-2002 -996,655.56 313589N41 MAT 11/062002 28-Aug-2002 996,655.56 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 27-Aug-2002 -996,655.56 313589N41 MAT 11/06/2002 28-Aug-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 28-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 27-Aug-2002 -69,600,000.00 99395W963 01.750%082&2002 DO 0827/ 27-Aug-2002 69,600,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 12Sep-1002 13:50:16 EexWloe Wmkbomh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 27-Aug-2002 -69,600,000.00 99395W963 01.750%08/28/2002 DO 0827/ 27-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 27-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Aug-2002 -69,500,000.00 9939SY175 01.770%08/29/2002 DO 091M 28-Aug-2002 69,500,000.00 B LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 28-Aug-2002 -69,500,000.00 99395Y175 01.770%OW912002 DO 08/291 28-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMANGOVTSECSINC.NY 28-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-Aug-2002 -69,600,000.00 99395Z511 01.770%0&302002 DO 03/29/ 29-Aug-2002 69,600,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-Aug-2002 -69,600,000.00 99395Z511 OL7700/oOW02002 DO 0829/ 29-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 29-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 592,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Aug-2002 592,000.00 996085247 30-Aug-2002 592,000.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 592,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Aug-2002 -592,000.00 996085247 30-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 30-Aug-2002 0.00 /1Sey1001 13:50:16 F"mtt n Woekbe..h - Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,677.83 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCf 30-Aug-2002 -6,677.83 996087094 30-Aug-2002 6,677.83 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 30-Aug-2002 -6,998,638.89 313397E49 MAT 09/032002 30-Aug-2002 6,998,638.89 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN WIG CORP DIS 30-Aug-2002 -6,998,63&89 313397E49 MAT 09/032002 30-Aug-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 30-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 30-Aug-2002 -42,991,400.00 313385E44 MAT 09/032002 30-Aug-2002 42,991,400.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 30-Aug-2002 42,991,400.00 31338SE44 MAT 09/032002 30-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 30-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 30-Aug-2002 -19,800,000.00 99396A622 01.8201A09/032002 DD 08/30/ 30-Aug-2002 19,800,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 30-Aug-2002 -19,800,000.00 99396A622 01.820%09/032002 DD 08/301 30-Aug-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 30-Aug-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 11-SV-2002 13:50:16 Executive Wwkbeneh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSO00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF 28-Jun-2002 -9,918,750.00 OIF060683 6.000%09/01/2032 DO 08/01/ 14-Aug-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 09-Jul-2002 -6,116,250.00 OIF060485 6.000%08/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 PC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 09-1ul-2002 -6,116,250.00 OIF060485 6.000%08/01/2017 DD 08/01/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 09-Jul-2002 -3,058,125.00 0IF060485 6.000%08/01/2011 DD 08/011 19-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-lul-2002 9,187,500.00 OIN062630 6.500%08/15/2032 DO 08/01/ 21-Aug-2002 -8,187,500.00 BC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 16-Jul-2002 -7,161,875.00 OIN062680 6.500%08/15/2032 DO 08/01/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 164u1-2002 3,582,031.25 OIN062680 6.500%0 811 5/20 3 2 DD 08/01/ 21-Aug-2002 -3,582,031.25 BC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 124ep-2002 I3:50:16 Fff"wiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE.. 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGW10000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLJDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,099.55 GNMA PGOLH0569358 16-Jul-2002 -1,027,150.85 362000QK3 6.500%04/15/2032 DD 04101/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 22-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 999,900.62 ONMA POOL80569358 16-Jul-2002 -1,023,335.79 362000QK3 6.500%04/152032 DD 04/011 21-Aug-2002 1,023,335.79 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 999,900.62 GNMA POOL M0569358 16-Jul-2002 -3,610.75 362000QK3 6.500%04/15/2032DD04/01/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 999,900.62 GNMA POOL 90569359 16-Jul-2002 -1,026,946.54 362000QK3 6.500%04/152032 DD 04/01/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 22-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 999,999.60 GNMA POOL80569358 16-Jul-2002 -1.023,437.09 362000QK3 6.500%0 411 52 0 3 2 DD 04/01/ 21-Aug-2002 1,023,437.09 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 999,999.60 GNMA POOL80569358 16-Jul-2002 -3,611.11 362000QK3 6.5001/6 04/152032 DD 04/01/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 999,999.60 ONMA POOL90569358 16-Jul-2002 -1,027,048.20 362000QK3 6.500%04/152032 DD 04/01/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 22-Aug-2002 0.00 I2Sep-2002 13.50.16 Hato m Worb wh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA IIIUMBOS 17-1ul-2002 -1,260,750.00 21HO72684 7.500%0820/2032 DO 08/01/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 22-lul-2002 -3,041,953.13 0IF052482 5.500%08/012017 DD 08/01/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 30-Jul-2002 4,996,875.00 01F060691 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 4,996,875.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 30-Jul-2002 -4,996,875.00 0IF060691 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 4,996,875.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 165,000.00 BANC ONE MILW NA SUB NTS 01-Aug-2002 -170,072.10 064216AA2 6.625%04/152003 DO 04115/9 06-Aug-2002 170,072.10 B ADVESTCO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 165,000.00 BANC ONE MILW NA SUB NTS 01-Aug-2002 -3,370.47 064216AA2 6,625%04/15/2003 DD 04/1519 06-Aug-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 165,000.00 BANC ONE MILW NA SUB NTS 01-Aug-2002 -173,442.57 064216AA2 6.625%04/15/2003 DO 04/1519 06-Aug-2002 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 06-Aug-2002 0.00 12-ST-2002 13:50:16 &eculiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE: 11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGOOOIOOOO 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 -3,080,625.00 0IF060493 6.000%09/01/2017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 3,090,625.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 -6,161,250.00 0IF060493 6.000%09/012017 DO 09/011 19-Sep-2002 6,161,250.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 01-Aug-2002 -615,984.00 073902B16 6.200%03/30/2003 DD 031309 06-Aug-2002 615,994.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 01-Aug-2002 -13,020.00 073902B16 6.200%03/302003 DD 03/30/9 06-Aug-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 01-Aug-2002 -629,004.00 073902B76 6.200%03/302003 DD 03/30/9 O&Aug-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 06-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO&CO NT 01-Aug-2002 560,601.00 949740CH5 7.200%05/012003 DD 0426/0 06-Aug-2002 560,601.00 g ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO&CO NT 01-Aug-2002 -10,260.00 949740CHS 7.200%05/012003 DD 0426/0 06-Aug-2002 0.00 ID 0.00 12-Sep-1001 13:50:16 Eremllw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 540,000.00 WELLS FARGO&CO NT 01-Aug-2002 -570,861.00 949740CH5 7.200%05/01/2003 DD 04/26/0 06-Aug-2002 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 -6,159,375.00 0IF060493 6.0001%09/012017 DD 09/011 19-Sep-2002 6,159,375.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 05-Aug-2002 -1,519,035.00 3133MCHF5 6.375%111152002 DD 11/09/0 06-Aug-2002 1,519,035.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BUS 05-Aug-2002 -21,515.63 3133MCHF5 6.375%11/152002 DO 11/0810 06-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 05-Aug-2002 -1,540,550.63 3133MCHF5 6.375%11/152002 DD 11/08/0 06-Aug-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 06-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Aug.2002 3,045,000.00 0IF052490 5.500%09/012017 DO 09101/ 19-Sep-2002 3,045,000.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Aug-2002 -3,045,000.00 0IF052490 5.500%09/012017 DO 09/01/ 19-Sep-2002 3,045,000.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 11-Sep-1001 13:50:16 Eumum Workbench " Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 19-Aug-2002 -1,264,500.00 21HO72692 7.5000/.09/202032 DO 09/01/ 23-Scp-2002 1,264,500.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,OOD,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 19-Aug-2002 -7,216,562.50 OIN062698 6.500%09/152032 DD 09/0U 23-Sep-2002 7,216,562.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 19-Aug-2002 -8,247,500.00 OIN062698 6.500%09/152032 DO 091011 23-Sep-2002 8,247,500.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 21-Aug-2002 -6,178,125.00 0IF0604AO 6.0001/o 10/012017DD 10/011 21-Oct-2002 6,178,125.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GTE NORTH INC DEB SERA 23-Aug-2002 -3,063,750.00 362337AD9 6.0009/601/152004 DO 0111519 28-Aug-2002 3,063,750.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GTE NORTH INC DEB SER A 23-Aug-2002 -21,500.00 362337AD9 6.0001/o 01/152004 DO 0111519 28-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 GTE NORTH INC DEB SER A 23-Aug-2002 -3,085,250.00 362337AD9 6.000%01/152004 DD 0111519 28-Aug-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 28-Aug-2002 0.00 11Sep-1001 /3:50:16 &emii.Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH&CO BONDS 26-Aug-2002 -508,160.00 590188HZ4 6.000%02/12/2003 DO 02/12/ 29-Aug-2002 508,160.00 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH&CO BONDS 26-Aug-2002 -1,416.67 590188HZ4 6.000%02/12/2003 DO 02/12/ 29-Aug-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH&CO BONDS 26-Aug-2002 -509,576.67 590188HZ4 6.000%02/12/2003 DO 021121 29-Aug-2002 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 29-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 28-Aug-2002 -7,229,697.50 OIN0626A5 6.500%10/15/2032 DD 10/011 23-Oct-2002 7,229,687.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 28-Aug-2002 -8,262,500.00 OIN0626A5 6.500%1 011 5/203 2 DO 10/01/ 23-Oct-2002 9,262,500.00 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-Aug-2002 -22,620,312.50 9128272JO 06.250%02/152007 DD 02/15/ 03-Sep-2002 22,620,312.50 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-Aug-2002 -64,538.05 912827210 06.250%02/152007 DO 02/15/ 03-Sep-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 PAY UPS 12-Sep-2001 13:50:16 Ececufm lf&k mh " Q Melton Trust-Sample Report PAGE.- 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE DROVER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,030.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2002 -14,030.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DD 011151 15-Jul-2002 14,030.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,030.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2002 -14,030.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 011151 15-1ul-2002 0.00 FC 30-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,363.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-lu1-2002 -3.363.00 9128274Y5 3.875%0111512009 DD 011151 15-Jul-2002 3,363.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,363.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jul-2002 -3,363.00 9128274Y5 3.875%01/152G09 DD 011151 15-1u1-2002 0.00 FC 30-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,858.85 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SEA 162 01-Aug-2002 -13,858.85 3133TI7A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/0119 01-Aug-2002 13,858.85 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,858.85 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SEA 162 01-Aug-2002 -13,858S5 3133TI7A4 6.000%11/152023 DD 11/01/9 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 20-Aug-2002 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 11-Sep1001 13:50.16 Fiecutive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Aug.2002 47,700,000.00 99394XB14 01.780%08/012002 DO 07/31/ 01-Aug-2002 -47,700,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .47,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Aug-2002 2,358.50 99394XS14 01.780%08/012002 DO 07/31/ 01-Aug-20D2 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO .47,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 01-Aug-2002 47,702,358.50 99394XS14 01.780%09/01/2002 DD 07/31/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS MG NY 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,022.74 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 02-Aug-2002 53,022.74 996087094 02-Aug-2002 .53.022.74 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,678.39 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 02-Aug-2002 4,678.39 9%087094 02-Aug-2002 4,678.39 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -796,738.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 02-Aug-2002 796,738.09 996085247 02-Aug-2002 -796,738.09 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -796,738.09 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Aug-2002 796,738,09 996085247 02-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 02-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50.16 Eweallw W&*bemh " Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Aug-2002 54,000,000.00 99394ZO58 0 1.740%09/02/2002 DD 08/01/ 02-Aug-2002 -54,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVTSECS R4C,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Aug-2002 2,610.00 99394ZO58 01.740%08/02/2002 DO 08/01/ 02-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 02-Aug-2002 54,002,610.00 99394ZO58 01.740%08/02,2002 DD 08/01/ 02-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 02-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Aug-2002 54,900,000.00 99395AI28 01.680%0 052002 DO 08/021 05•Aug-2002 -54,900,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Aug-2002 7,686.00 99395AI28 01.680%08/052002 DD 08/021 05-Aug-2002 0.00 is 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,900.000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 05-Aug-2002 54,907,686.00 99395AI28 01.690%08/052002 DO 08M2/ 05-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 05-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO -2,913,858.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Aug-2002 2,913,858.20 996085247 06-Aug-2002 -2,913,858.20 S 0.00 12ST-2002 13:50:16 Executiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GADULOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,913,858.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Aug-2002 2,913,858.20 9%085247 06-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 06-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -97,354.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Aug-2002 97,354.00 9%085247 06-Aug-2002 -97,354.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -97,354.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-Aug-2002 97,354.00 996085247 06-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 06-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -27,000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 06-Aug-2002 27,000,000.00 99395BO35 01.730%08/06/2002 DD 08/05/ 06-Aug-2002 -27,000,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 06-Aug-2002 1,297.50 99395BO35 01.730%08/062002 DD 081051 06-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,000,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 06-Aug-2002 27,001,297.50 99395BO35 01.730%08/062002 DO 081051 06-Aug-2002 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 06-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27.900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 06-Aug-2002 27,900,000.00 9939SA953 01.7400/.09/06/2002 DO 081051 06-Aug-2002 -27,900,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50.16 Em.dw Wakbeneh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.' 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0,00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,90D,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 06-Aug-2002 1,348.50 99395A953 01.740%08/06/2002 DD 08/051 06-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 06-Aug-2002 27,901,348.50 99395A953 01.7401/608/06/2002 DD 08/05/ 06-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 06-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Aug-2002 55,000,000.00 99395C462 01.760%08/07/2002 DO 08A16/ 07-Aug-2002 -55,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Aug-2002 2,688.89 99395C462 01.760%08/07/2002 DO 08/061 07-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 07-Aug-2002 55,002,688.89 99395C462 01.760-A 08/07/2002 DO 08/06/ 07-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -422,130.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Aug-2002 422,130.28 9%085247 08-Aug-2002 -422,130.28 g 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -422,130.28 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Aug-2002 422,130.28 996085247 08-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 08-Aug-2002 0.00 12SV-2002 13:50:16 Emculiw Wwkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG06010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Aug-2002 68,000,000.00 99395D916 01.750%08/08/2002 DD 08/07/ 08-Aug-2002 -68,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 08-Aug-2002 3,305.56 99395D916 01.750%08/09/2002 DO 09/071 08-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 08-Aug-2002 68,003,305.56 99395D916 01.750%08/08/2002 DO 08/071 08-Aug.2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 09-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 MINNESOTA MNG&MFG DISC 08-Aug-2002 699,763.17 60406BHF9 08/15/2002 08-Aug-2002 -699,943.06 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 920.11 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 MINNESOTA NINE&MFG DISC 08-Aug-2002 699,763.17 60406BHF9 08/15/2002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -527,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN OK CONS DISC 08-Aug-2002 526,184.91 313385B39 MAT 09/09/2002 08-Aug-2002 -526,184.91 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -327,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 08-Aug-2002 791.23 313385B39 MAT 08/09/2002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50.16 Ewcuthu Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Re ortiJ PAGE" 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000/0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DAT& COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -527,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 08-Aug-2002 526,976.14 313385B39 MAT OSM92002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 09-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,872,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 08-Aug-2002 1,856,184.53 313589B85 MAT 08/142002 08-Aug-2002 -1,856,184.53 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,972,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 08-Aug-2002 15,306.91 3135891385 MAT08/142002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,872,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 08-Aug-2002 1,971,491.44 313589B85 MAT 08/142002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69.500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Aug-2002 69,500,000.00 99395E682 01.730°A 09/092002 DD 08/08/ 09-Aug-2002 -69,500,000.00 S LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Aug-2002 3,339.96 99395E682 01.730%09/092002 DD 08%8/ 09-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 09-Aug-2002 69,503,339.86 99395E682 01.730%O8/092002 DD OS/08/ 09-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 09-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2002 /3:50:I6 Earcwm Wo*&mh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSACONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69.300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12-Aug-2002 69,300,000.00 9939SF978 01.660%09/122002 DO 09M9/ 12-Aug-2002 -69,300,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,300.000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12-Aug-2002 9,586.50 9939SF978 01.660°%08/122002 DO 08109/ 12-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 12-Aug-2002 69,309,596.50 99395F978 01.660%09/12MM DO 091091 12-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY I2-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 13-Aug-2002 53,900,000.00 99395GM 01.730%08/13/M2 DO 081121 13-Aug-2002 -53,900,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 13-Aug-2002 2,590.19 993950968 01.730%08/132002 DD 08/12/ 13-Aug-2002 0.00 is 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 13-Aug-2002 53,902,590.19 99395G968 01.730%09/13/2002 DD 08112/ 13-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-Aug-2002 53,900,000.00 99395J293 01.690%08/14/2002 DD 08/131 14-Aug-2002 -53,900,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50:16 Evcurive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000lmoo - 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE! COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-Aug-2002 2,530.31 993953293 01.690%08/14/2002 DO 08/13/ 14-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -53,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-Aug-2002 53,902,530.31 993953293 01.690%0S/14/2002 DD 08/13/ 14-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 14-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 15-Aug-2002 54,000,000.00 99395K597 01.690%0 811 5/2 0 02 DO 08/14/ 15-Aug-2002 -54,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 15-Aug-2002 2,535.00 99395K597 01.690%08/152002 DO OS/14/ 15-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 15-Aug-2002 54,002,535.00 99395K597 01.690%08/152002 DD 08/14/ 15-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .13,902,437.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Aug-2002 - 13,902,437.00 996085247 16-Aug-2002 .13,902,437.00 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,902,437.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Aug-2002 13,902,437.00 996085247 16-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 16-Aug-2002 0.00 12Sep2002 13:50:16 &emliw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE.' 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO I6-Aug-2002 54,000,000.00 99395MO99 01.920%08/162W2 DO 09115/ 16-Aug-2002 -54,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-Aug-2002 2,730.00 9939SM098 01.820%08/162002 DO 091151 16-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-Aug-2002 54,002,730.00 99395MO98 01.820%08/162002 DO 091151 16-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC,NY 16-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 19-Aug-2002 68,000,000.00 99395N401 01.750%09/192002 DD 08/16/ 19-Aug-2002 -68,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 19-Aug-2002 9,916.67 99395N401 01.750%08/192002 DO 081161 19-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69.000,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 19-Aug-2002 69,009,916.67 99395N401 01.750%081192002 DO 08/16/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -196,631.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Aug-2002 196,631.25 996085247 20-Aug-2002 -196,631.25 S 0.00 12Sep-2002 13:50.16 Fixwive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -196,631.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Aug-2002 196,631.25 996085247 20-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Aug-2002 55,700,000.00 99395P299 01.720%082012002 DO 08/19/ 20-Aug-2002 -55,700,000.00 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Aug-2002 2,661.22 99395P299 01.720%08202002 DD 08/19/ 20-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-Aug-2002 55,702,661.22 9939SP299 01.720%09202002 DO 08/19/ 20-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,057.31 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 21-Aug-2002 20,057.31 9196087094 21-Aug-2002 -20,057.31 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -996,053.74 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Aug-2002 996,053.74 996085247 21-Aug-2002 -996,053.74 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -996,053.74 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Aug-2002 9%,053.74 996085247 21-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 21-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50.16 Executive Warkbexk Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCSG000/0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,505,420.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Aug-2002 13,505,420.06 996085247 21-Aug-2002 -13,505,420.06 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -13,505,420.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Aug-2002 13,505,420.06 996085247 21-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Aug-2002 55,900,000.00 99395Q735 01.690%0821/2002 DD 08/20/ 21-Aug-2002 -55,900,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 2I-Aug-2002 2,624.19 99395Q735 01.690%0821/2002 DO 0820/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,900,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 21-Aug-2002 55,902,624.19 99395Q735 01.6901%08212002 DD 0820/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,191,383.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Aug-2002 3,191,383.02 996085247 22-Aug-2002 -3,191,383.02 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,191,383.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Aug-2002 3,191,383.02 996085247 22-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 22-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-1001 13:50:16 Exeeu/"weimewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Aug-2002 69,600,000.00 99395S103 01,700%08222002 DO 0821/ 22-Aug-2002 -69,600,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Aug-2002 3,286.67 99395S103 01.7000/.08222002 DO 0821/ 22-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-Aug-2002 69,603,286.67 99395S103 01.700%0822/2002 DO 0821/ 22-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -296,655.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Aug-2002 296.655.33 996085247 23-Aug-2002 -296,655.33 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -98,394.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Aug-2002 98,394.67 996085247 23-Aug-2002 -98,394.67 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -296,655.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Aug-2002 296,655.33 996085247 23-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 23-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -98,394.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Aug-2002 98.394.67 996085247 23-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 23-Aug-2002 0.00 12-SeP-2002 13:50:16 Eveeullm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL oCSG000l0000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,200,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 23-Aug-2002 69,2D0,000.00 99395T333 01.7401%D&M2002 DO 0822/ 23-Aug-2002 -69,200,000.00 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS BJC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,200,000.00 LEHMAN CAT REPO 23-Aug-2002 3,344.67 993951333 01.740%0823/2002 DO 08/n 23-Aug-2002 0.00 1s 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,200,0D0.0D LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 23-Aug-2002 69,203,344.67 993951333 01.740%08232002 DO 0822/ 23-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 23-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-Aug-2002 69,500,000.00 99395U686 01.660%08262002 DO 0823/ 26-Aug-2002 -69,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-Aug-2002 9,614.17 99395U686 01.660%08262002 DO 0823/ 26-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-Aug-2002 69,509,614.17 99395U686 01.660%08262002 DO 0823/ 26-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 26-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,590,393.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Aug-2002 1,590,393.46 996085247 27-Aug-2002 -1,590,393.46 S 0.00 12Sep-1002 13:50.16 Executive Workbench - Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,590,393.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Aug-2002 1,590,393.46 996095247 27-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 27-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,000,000.00 LEHMM BROTHERS REPO 27-Aug-2002 68,000,000.00 99395V577 01,720%08/27/2002 DO 08n6/ 27-Aug-2002 -68,000,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 27-Aug-2002 3,248.89 99395V577 01.720-A 08/272002 DO 0&/26/ 27-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 27-Aug-2002 68,003,248.89 99395V577 01.720%08272002 DD 0826/ 27-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 27-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -996,655.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Aug-2002 996,655.56 996085247 28-Aug-2002 -996,655.56 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -996,655,56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Aug-2002 996,655.56 996085247 28-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 28-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,981,868.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Aug-2002 2,991,868.02 996085247 28-Aug-2002 -2,981,868.02 S 0.00 12SM-2002 13:50:16 Eeecuaw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,981,868.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Aug-2002 2,981,868.02 996085247 28-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 28-Aug2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Aug-2002 69,600,000.00 99395W963 01.750%Og2g2002 DO 08/27/ 28-Aug.2002 -69,600,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Aug-2002 3,383.33 99395W963 01.750%06282002 DO 0827/ 28-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -69.600,000.00 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 28-Aug-2002 69.603,383,33 99395W963 01.750%08/182002 DD 0827/ 28-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC.NY 28-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -509.576.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Aug-2002 509,576.67 996085247 29-Aug-2002 -509,576.67 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -509,576.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Aug-2002 509,576.67 996085247 29-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 29-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -96,582.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Aug-2002 96.592.92 996085247 29-Aug-2002 -96,582.92 S 0.00 12SM-2002 13:50:16 EmWm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL DCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE CAINILOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -96,582.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Aug-2002 96,582.92 996085247 29-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 29-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-Aug-2002 69,500,000.00 99395Y175 01.770°/.0829/2002 DO 081281 29-Aug-2002 -69,500,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-Aug-2002 3,417.08 99395YI75 01.770%08/292002 DO 0828/ 29-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-Aug-2002 69,503,417.08 99395YI75 01.770%08292002 DO 0828/ 29-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS WC,NY 29-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,186,616.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Aug-2002 186,616.89 996085247 30-Aug-2002 -186,616.89 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -196,616.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Aug-2002 186,616.89 996085247 30-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 30-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 30-Aug-2002 69,600,000.00 99392511 01.770%09/302002 DO 0829/ 30-Aug-2002 -69,600,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 12Sep-2002 13:50:16 Executive Wwkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 43 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 30-Aug-2002 3,422.00 99395Z511 01.770-A 08/302002 DD 0829/ 30-Aug-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 30-Aug-2002 69,603,422.00 99395Z511 01.770"/609/302002 DD 0829/ 30-Aug-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 30-Aug-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF 30-Jul-2002 10,035,937.50 0IF060693 6.000%08/012032 DD 081011 14-Aug-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 14-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -3,000,000.00 COMMRTOPURFNMASFMTG 01-Aug-2002 3,090,117.19 0IF060485 6.000^/e08/01/2017 DO 08/011 19-Aug-2002 -3,058,125.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS MC,NY 31,992.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 3,090,117.19 0IF060495 6.000%08/012017 DD 08/01/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 6,178359.38 0IF060485 6.0000/e08/012017 DO 09/01/ 19-Aug-2002 -6,116,250.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 62,109.38 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 6,178,359.38 0IF060485 6.000%08/012017 DO 08101/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-1001 13:50:16 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE.- 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLJDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 6,180,234.38 0IF060495 6.0001%08/01/2017 DO 08/01/ 19-Aug-2002 -6,116,250.00 S BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 63,994.39 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Aug-2002 6,190,234.38 01F060495 6.0001%08/01/2017 DO 08/01/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 PC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Aug-2002 3,055,898A4 0IF052482 5.500%08/01/2017 DD 08/M/ 19-Aug-2002 -3,041,953.13 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 13,945.31 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 07-Aug-2002 3,055,898.44 0IF052482 5.5000/.08/01/2017 DO 08/01/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG I4-Aug-2002 5,101,562.50 0IF060691 6.000%09/012032 DD 09/01/ 16-Sep-2002 4,996,875.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 104,687.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA 11 JUMBOS 19-Aug-2002 1,265,812.50 21HO72684 7.500%08202032 DO 08/01/ 21-Aug-2002 -1,260,750.00 S WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 5,062.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 19-Aug-2002 1,265,812.50 21HO72684 7.500%08202032 DO 08/01/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 PC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 21-Aug-2002 0.00 12SW-2002 13:50:16 E.xurim Wakbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 45 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SNARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG 19-Aug-2002 7,240,898,44 OIN062680 6.500%08/15/2032 DO 08/011 21-Aug-2002 -7,161,975.00 S 79,023.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 19-Aug-2002 7,240,898.44 OIN062690 6.500%08/15/2032 DO 0WII 21-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 19-Aug-2002 8,275,312.50 OIN062680 6.500%O8/15/2032 DD 08101/ 21-Aug-2002 -8.187,500.00 S $7,812.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 19-Aug-2002 8,275,312.50 0IN062680 6.5001Y 0 9/1 5 2 03 2 DO 09/011 21-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTO 21-Aug-2002 6,195,937.50 OIF060493 6.000%09/012017 DD 09/01/ 19-Sep2002 -6,160,500.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 35,437.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 28-Aug-2002 7,250,195.31 OIN062698 6.500%09/152032 DO 09/011 28-Aug-2002 -7,216,562.50 S 33,632.91 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 28-Aug-2002 8,285,937.50 OIN062698 6.500%09/152032 DO 09/01/ 28-Aug-2002 -8,247,500.00 S 38,437.50 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 12-&p-1001 13:50:16 Executive Waekbewh QMellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 46 . PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,559.00 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Jul-2002 9,559.00 31348SWZ3 6.3840/a 01/01/2028 DO 12/011 01-1ul-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PJMC0 45,364.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Jul-2002 45,364.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 01-1ul-2002 45,414.11 PDC 49.61 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,364.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Jul-2002 45,364.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 09/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Jul-2002 .45,412.83 PD -48.33 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -45,364.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Jul-2002 45,364.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/ 01-Jul-2002 0.00 FC 28-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,120.02 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Aug-2002 2,120.02 36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029 DO 04/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -2,012.36 PD 107.66 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,120.02 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Aug-2002 2,120.02 36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,194.21 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Aug-2002 26,194.21 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -24,864.04 PD 1,330.17 12-Sep-2002 13:50.16 Ececutlm Workbench QMellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 47 . PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,194.21 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-Aug-2002 26,194.21 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029DD03/0V 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 410.80 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Aug-2002 410.80 36210SPAO 6.000ftA04/15/1029DD04/01/ OI-Aug-2002 389.94 PD 20.96 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 410.80 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Aug-2002 410.80 36210SPAO 6.000%(14/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,499.87 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Aug-2002 1,499.87 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -1,423.70 PD 76.17 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,499.87 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Aug-2002 1,499.87 3621000E5 6.0000/.02/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,109.98 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Aug-2002 1,109.98 362IONP45 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -1,053.61 PD 56.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,109.98 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Aug-2002 1,109.98 362IONP45 6.0009%1211 52 02 8 DD 12/011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 11-Sep-1001 13:50.16 E:eeulhe Worklxneh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.' 48 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 MD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.081.66 GNMA POOL80496461 01-Aug-2002 1,081.66 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -1,026.73 PD 54.93 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.081.66 GNMA POOL80496461 01-Aug-2002 1,081.66 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7.28 GNMA POOL80496284 01-Aug-2002 7.28 36210MJSI 6.000°k01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -6.91 PD 0.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7.28 GNMA POOLd0496284 01-Aug-2002 7.28 36210MJ51 6.0001/601/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -223.73 GNMA POOL80486720 01-Aug-2002 223.73 36210AVM6 6,000% 12/152028 DD 121011 01-Aug-2002 -212.37 PD 11.36 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -223.73 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Aug-2002 223.73 36210AVM6 6.000°A 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/ 01•Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO •24,441.13 GNMA POOL 80465555 01-Aug-2002 24,441.13 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 091011 01-Aug-2002 •23,199.98 PD 1,241.15 12-Sep-2001 13:50r16 ExeeulNe Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 49 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD.CONSOGDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,441.13 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Aug-2002 24,441.13 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,998.74 GNMA POOLN0465546 01-Aug-2002 5,998.74 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028 DD 08/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -5,694.12 PD 304.62 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,999.74 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Aug-2002 5,999.74 36209AE13 6.000%08/15/2028DD08/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,064.32 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Aug-2002 1,064.32 36209DHQ0 6.000-KOVIS/2028DD08/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -1,010.27 PD 54.05 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,064.32 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Aug-2002 1,064.32 36209DHQO 6.000%08/15/2028DD08/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57.98 GNMA POOL#0468330 01-Aug-2002 57.99 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152029DD05/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -55.04 PD 2.94 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57.98 GNMA POOL#0468330 01-Aug-2002 57.98 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DD 05/011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 12Sep-2002 13:50:16 &eew.Wor##eimh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE- 50 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG"l0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -902.87 GNMA POOL 90467286 01-Aug-2002 902.87 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/011 01-Aug-2002 -957.02 PD 45.85 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -902.87 GNMA POOL80467286 01-Aug-2002 902.87 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -70.88 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Aug-2002 70.88 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD 101011 01-Aug-2002 -67.28 PD 3.60 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -70.98 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Aug-2002 70.88 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .761.97 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Aug-2002 761.97 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -723.28 PD 38.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -761.97 GNMA POOL80457814 01-Aug-2002 761.97 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152029 DD 10/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LUNG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40.31 GNMA POOL 00483452 01-Aug-2002 40.31 36209NBV3 6.000%09/152028 DD 09/011 01-Aug-2002 -38.26 PD 2.05 12Sep.2002 13:50.16 &wutiw Wwkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 51 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS'000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40.31 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Aug-2002 40.31 36209WBV3 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,190.78 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Aug-2002 1,190.78 36209EXRS COMM.11/152028 DD I I/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -1,130.31 PD 60.47 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,190.78 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Aug-2002 1,190.78 36209EXR8 6.000%11/152028 DO 11/011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .75.05 GNMA POOL00438057 01-Aug-2002 75.05 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028 DD 03/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -71.24 PD 3.81 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -75.05 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Aug-2002 75.05 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -351,007.28 FHLMC GROUP#GS-0476 01-Aug-2002 351,007.28 3129DDQ55 7.0001.02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -356,503.02 PD -5,495.74 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -351,007.28 FHLMC GROUP#05-0476 01-Aug-2002 351,007.28 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/OI/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 12,kp.2002 13:50:16 &ecuriw Wakbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 52 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,737.77 FHLMC GROUP N04-0353 01-Aug-2002 8,737.77 3128DBMA2 7.500%1 0/0 112004 DO 03/01/ 01-Aug-2002 -9,958.94 PD -221.17 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,737.77 FHLMC GROUP NG4-0353 01-Aug-2002 9,737.77 3128DBMA2 7.500°/h 10/01/2004 DO 03/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,911.93 GNMA II POOL 00080395 01-Aug-2002 18,911.93 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04120/203ODD04/011 01-Aug-2002 -18,740.54 PD 171.39 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,911.93 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Aug-2002 18,911.93 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -94,541.49 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 01-Aug-2002 94,541.49 831641 DD4 6.640%02/10/2011 DO 02/2U 01-Aug-2002 -94,541.49 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -94,541.49 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 01-Aug-2002 94,541.49 831641DD4 6.640%02/10/2011 DD021211 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 12-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,168.54 GNMA POOLN0491103 01-Aug-2002 8,169.54 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD0U01/ 01-Aug-2002 -7,753.73 PD 414.91 12-Sep-2002 13:30.16 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 53 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,168.54 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Aug-2002 8,168.54 36210FRY4 E0001%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,781.95 FHLMC GROUP#786064 01-Aug-2002 5,781.95 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 12/011 01-Aug-2002 -5,641.02 PD 140.93 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,495.09 GNMA II POOL#0080023 01-Aug-2002 9,495.09 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 1220/2026 DO 1210119 01-Aug-2002 -8,635.79 PD -140.70 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,495.09 GNMA II POOL#008D023 01-Aug-2002 8,495.09 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 17/202026 DO 12/0119 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -138,746.00 GNMA II POOL#080408X 01-Aug-2002 138,746.00 36225CN29 6.500%05/202030 DO 05/011 01-Aug-2002 -137,336.86 PD 1,409.14 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -138,746.00 GNMA II POOL#080408X 01-Aug-2002 138,746.00 36225CN28 6.500%0520/2030 DO 051011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 20-Aug-2002 0.0D LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -37,629.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Aug-2002 37,629.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DO 12/0V 01-Aug-2002 -37,669.09 PD -40.09 12-Sep-2002 13:50:16 Eiecuriw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE: 54 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,375.69 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01-Aug-2002 1,375.69 39810#AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DD 02/2910 01-Aug-2002 -1,355.59 PD 20.10 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,375.69 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01-Aug-2002 1,375.69 39810#AE4 7.430%06/012003 DD 02/29/0 01-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 27-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 688.45 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-Aug-2002 688.45 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DD 1021/9 01-Aug-2002 -673.50 PD 14.95 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 698.45 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-Aug-2002 688.45 302998GE3 7.500%1 210 1 2 03 0 DO 102119 01-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 30-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -42,614.68 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-Aug-2002 42,614.68 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Aug-2002 43,546.88 PD -932.20 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -36,386.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-Aug-2002 36,386.00 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DD 062119 08-Aug-2002 -37,397.99 PD 1,011.99 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -36,386.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A4 08-Aug-2002 36,396.00 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DO 062119 08-Aug-2002 0.00 PC 08-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-1002 13:50.16 Eieculiw Workbench Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE.- SS 0. PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000loom 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51,366.81 DISTRIBUTION FML 99-1 CL A4 15-Aug-2002 51,366.81 25475MAD6 5.840'/010/172011 DO 03111/ 15-Aug-2002 -52,442.30 PD -1,075.49 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51,366.91 DISTRIBUTION FML 99-1 CL A4 15-Aug-2002 51.366.81 25475MAD6 5.840%10/172011 DD 03/181 15-Aug-2002 0.00 FC 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,775.88 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Aug-2002 46,775.99 3837114NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Aug12002 -46,775.99 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,775.88 GNMA OM REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 16-Aug-2002 46.775.88 3837144NX9 VARRT0 2116 2 03 0 16-Aug-2002 0.00 FC WAug-2002 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -270,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 01-Aug-2002 269,619.37 313397A35 MAT08/012002 01-Aug-2002 -269,619.37 MT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1.000,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 02-Aug-2002 999,293.33 5007MIH22 08/022002 02-Aug-2002 -999,283.33 MT 02-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50:16 Ewcudw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsGM10000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,839,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Aug-2002 3,825,235.08 313589A78 MAT 08/05/2002 05-Aug-2002 -3,82.5,235.08 MT 05-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Aug-2002 17,445,020.93 313589A94 MAT OSM72002 07-Aug-2002 -17,445,020.83 MT 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-Aug-2002 1,498,342.09 313385A97 MAT08/072002 07-Aug-2002 -1,498,342.09 MT 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Aug-2002 499,14931 313589A94 MAT 08/07/2002 07-Aug-2002 -499,149.31 MT 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 08-Aug-2002 799,082.67 313313B23 MAT 08/092002 08-Aug-2002 -799,092.67 MT 08-Aug-20D2 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BE CONS DISC 08-Aug-2002 4,499,787.50 313385B21 MAT 08/08/2002 08-Aug-2002 -4,499,787.50 MT 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC 08-Aug-2002 199,650.00 3133851321 MAT O& 2002 MAug-2002 -199,650.00 MT 08-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50:16 Executive wm bnmh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 57 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,262,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 08-Aug-2002 1,256,603.55 313397B26 MAT 08/08/2002 08-Aug-2002 -1,256,603.55 MT " 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -250,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 15-Aug-2002 249,538.19 313397B91 MAT08/15/2002 15-Aug-2002 -249,538.19 MT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 20-Aug-2002 1,298,403.89 313397C66 MAT 08/20/2002 20-Aug-2002 -1,298,403.89 MT 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 21-Aug-2002 1,497,825.00 97665SHM5 08212002 21-Aug-2002 -1,497,825.00 MT 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 23-Aug-2002 699,504.17 5007MIHP1 08232002 23-Aug-2002 -699,504.17 MT 23-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -592,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOU 30-Aug-2002 590,577.56 313589D83 MAT08/30/2002 30-Aug-2002 -590,577.56 MT 30-Aug-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -155,000.00 BANK ONE CORP NT 01-Aug-2002 155,000.00 06423AAC7 6.400%08/012002 DO 0722/9 01-Aug-2002 -157,743.75 MT 01-Aug-2002 -2,743.75 12Sep-2002 13.50.16 Execulm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 58 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsGo00/0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -605,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS INC 01-Aug-2002 605,000.00 125569DP5 6.375%08/01/2002 DO 07/2819 01-Aug-2002 -619,520.00 MT - 01-Aug-2002 -14,520.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -165,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 01-Aug-2002 165,000.00 617446CQO 6.375%08/01/2002 DO 07/29/9 01-Aug-2002 -169,652.05 MT 01-Aug-2002 -3,652.05 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 WAL MART STORES INC NT 01-Aug-2002 200,000.00 931142BG7 6.875%08/01/2002 DD 08/01/0 01-Aug-2002 -206,194.00 MT 01-Aug-2002 -6,194.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN MTR006 08-Aug-2002 1,500,000.00 17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/ 08-Aug-2002 -1,499,415.00 MT 08-Aug-2002 585.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS MTN 8 TRO04 12-Aug-2002 600,000.00 073928SW4 5.750%08/12/2002 DO 02/12/0 12-Aug-2002 -610,968.00 MT 12-Aug-2002 -10,968.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 GTE CORP MTN TR 00001 14-Aug-2002 500,000.00 36232HAA4 6.560^/e08/142002 DO 09114/ 14-Aug-2002 -508,080.00 MT 14-Aug-2002 -8,080.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -575,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 15-Aug-2002 575,000.00 718154BVB 7.125%08/152002 DD 08/199 15-Aug-2002 -592,927.30 MT 15-Aug-2002 -17,927.30 11-Sep-2W2 13:30:16 Encu/im Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 59 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE! AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO •50.000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN S/ 15-Aug-2002 50,000.00 86387THM3 VAR RT 08/152002 DD 0221/ 15-Aug-2002 49,953.13 MT 15-Aug-2002 46.87 CORPORATE ACTIONS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,162.13 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Jul-2002 0.00 9128274Y5 3.875%01/152009 DO 011151 31-Jul-2002 0.00 SDC 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,140.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 31-Jul-2002 0.00 9128274Y5 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-Jul-2002 1,140.00 SO 1,140.00 INTEREST LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -3,950,000.00 GMAC NTS 20-May-2002 -19,848.75 370425QV5 VAR RT 08/182003 DO 08/17/ 19-May-2002 0.00 ITC 20-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GMAC NTS 20-May-2002 19,836.90 370425QV5 VAR RT 09/192003 DD 08/17/ 19-May-2002 0.00 IT 20-May.2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-Aug-2002 0.02 996087094 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep2002 13:50:I6 Evecufive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 60 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 NABISCO INC NTS 01-Aug-2002 122,500.00 629527CA8 VAR RT 0 210 1/2 0 3 3 DO 01/2219 01-Aug.2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GTE CORP MTN TR 00001 01-Aug-2002 16,400.00 36232HAA4 6.560%08/14/2002 DO 08/14/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 165,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN W ITTER 01-Aug-2002 5,259.38 617446000 6.375%08/01/2D02 DO 07/28/9 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 WAL MART STORES INC NT 01-Aug-2002 6,875.00 9311421167 6.875%08/01/2002 DD 08101/0 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Aug.2002 53,022.74 996085247 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 155,000.00 BANK ONE CORP NT 01-Aug-2002 4,960.00 06423AAC7 6.400°A 09/01/2002 DO 07/22/9 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 605,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS INC 01-Aug-2002 19,284.38 125569DP5 6.375%08/01/2002 DO 07/28/9 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sap-2002 13:50:16 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 6/ PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Aug-2002 4,678.39 996085247 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 270,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 01-Aug-2002 380.63 313397A35 MAT 08/01/2002 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 01-Aug-2002 47,629.17 67982XAA6 VAR RT 11/01/2005 DO 0428/0 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 01-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 02-Aug-2002 716.67 5007MIH22 08/022002 02-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 02-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN#0061 05-Aug-2002 22,500.00 37042WE80 FLTG RT 08/04/2003 DD 08/03/ 05-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 05-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,839,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 05-Aug-2002 13,764.92 313589A78 MAT 08/052002 05-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 05-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-Aug-2002 1,657.92 313385A97 MAT 08/072002 07-Aug-2002 0.00 1T 07-Aug-2002 0.00 11-Sep2001 /3:50:16 Executroe WOkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 62 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCS&CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Aug-2002 950.69 313589A94 MAT 03/07/2002 07-Aug-2002 0.00 IT - 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 07-Aug-2002 54,979A7 313589A94 MAT 08/07/2002 07-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 07-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 08-Aug-2002 917,33 313313B23 MAT 09/08/2002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 08-Aug-2002 350.00 3133851321 MAT 09/08/2002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 08-Aug-2002 212.50 313385B21 MAT 08/09/2002 O&Aug-2002 0.00 IT 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,262,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 08-Aug-2002 5,396.45 313397B26 MAT 08/08l2002 08-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 36,386.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A4 08-Aug-2002 2,046.00 74046RFW6 6.430%03/0 912 0 0 4 DD 06/21/9 08-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 08-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:30:16 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 63 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSGoo010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN#TR006 08-Aug-2002 1,813.85 1712OQ680 FLTG RT 08/082002 DD 04/08/ 08-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH SR NT 09-Aug-2002 9,318.33 046003KHI FLTG RT 05/082003 DD 051091 08-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 08-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 NATURAL RURAL UITLS COOP FIN 12-Aug-2002 14,750.00 637432CK9 7.375%02/102003 DD 02/1010 10-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 12-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 12-Aug-2002 10,186.94 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/112003 DD 05111/ 1I-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 12-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 94,541.49 SBA GTD PARTN CPFS SBIC-PS 0 12-Aug-2002 50,160.91 831641DD4 6.6409%02/10/2011 DO 0221/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 12-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS MTN#TRO04 13-Aug-2002 17,250.00 073928SW4 5.750%08/12/2002 DO 02/1210 12-Aug-2002 0.00 1T 13-Aug-2002 010 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 13-Aug-2002 10,426.67 345397RV7 FLTG RT 02J132003 DD 02/I3/ 13-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 13-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep2002 13:50.16 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 64 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 GTE CORP MTN TR 00001 I4-Aug-2002 1,184.44 36232HAA4 6.560%08/14/2002 DD 08/14/ 14-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 14-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 15-Aug-2002 552,187.50 31359MFHI 7.125%02/15/2005 DD 02/14/0 15-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 15-Aug-2002 267,187.50 3133MAUN7 7.125%02/15/2005 DO 02/08/0 15-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 193,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CR CORP NT 15-Aug-2002 8,492.00 724477AKO 8.800%02/15/2003 DD 02112/9 15-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 575,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 15-Aug-2002 20,484.38 718154BV8 7.125%0 911 5/2 0 0 2 DD 08115/9 15-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-Aug-2002 187,500.00 912927378 06.250%02/15/2003 DD 021151 15-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 50,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN S/ 15-Aug-2002 434.68 86387THM3 VAR RT 09/15/2002 DD 02/211 15-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:SO:16 Execudw Workbench Q Mellon Trust:-Sam le Re ort PAGE: 65 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocs000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,800,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP#TR 00562 15-Aug-2002 19,997.12 37042WZKO VAR RT 02/14/2003 DD 02/14/ 15-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 15-Aug-2002 461.81 313397B91 MAT 08/15/2002 15-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 223.73 GNMA POOL#0486720 15-Aug-2002 96.19 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,168.54 GNMA POOL#0491103 15-Aug-2002 1.111.37 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7.28 GNMA POOL#0496284 15-Aug-2002 29.% 36210MJ51 6.000%01/15/2029 DO 02101/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT I5-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,081.66 GNMA POOL#0496461 15-Aug-2002 3,940.67 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,109.98 GNMA POOL#0497343 15-Aug-2002 204.57 3621ONP45 6.000-A 12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 11-Sep-1001 13:50:16 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 66 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002 -31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURWY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,499.87 GNMA POOL 80499153 15-Aug-2002 129.00 3621000E5 6.000°/02/15/2029 DD 02/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 1T 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 410.80 GNMA POOL 80500917 15-Aug-2002 102.52 36210SPA0 6.000%04/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,194.21 GNMA POOL#0503398 15-Aug-2002 3,809.38 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DO 03/011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,737.77 FHLMC GROUPMG4-0353 15-Aug-2002 2,395.30 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DO 03/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 351,007.28 FHLMC GROUP NGS-0476 15-Aug-2002 5,984.68 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DO 02101/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2.120.02 GNMA POOL 80506636 15-Aug-2002 304.59 36210YY90 6.000Yo04/152029 DD 04/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 75.05 GNMA POOL s0438057 15-Aug-2002 205.09 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01•Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2002 13:50:16 Executive WurkhenM Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 67 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,559.00 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 15-Aug-2002 745.11 31348SWZ3 6.384Yo01/012028 DO 12101/ 01-Jul-2002 0.00 IT I5-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 761.97 GNMA POOL80457814 15-Aug-2002 371.84 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,998.74 GNMA POOL80465546 15-Aug-2002 4,109.19 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,441.13 GNMA POOL 80465555 15-Aug-2002 4,048.87 36209AF48 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 70.88 GNMA POOL W0467279 15-Aug-2002 219.08 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 902.87 GNMA POOL 80467286 15-Aug-2002 3,408.69 36209CCX2 6.0000/.10/152028 DO 10/011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57.98 GNMA POOL 90468330 15-Aug-2002 170.92 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 051011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 I2Sep2002 13:50:16 Execul1w Wa nch - Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 68 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,064.32 GNMA POOL 40468339 15-Aug-2002 3,910.40 36209DHQO 6.00D%08/15/2028DD08/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,190.78 GNMA POOL#0469683 15-Aug-2002 187.38 36209EXRB 6.000%11/152028 DO I I/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40.31 GNMA POOL 80483452 15-Aug-2002 161.04 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51,366.81 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99.1 CL A4 15-Aug-2002 2,919,39 25475MAD6 5.840%10/172011 DD03/18/ 15-Aug-2002 0.00 1T 15-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,775.89 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-Aug-2002 2,705.62 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 16-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN g TR 00459 19-Aug-2002 5,193.50 073928VC4 FLTG RT 12/012003 DO 08/17/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 19-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GMACNTS 19-Aug-2002 20,057.31 370425QV5 VAR RT 08/182003DD08/17/ 19-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 19-Aug-2002 0.00 11-Sep-2001 13:50:16 Execveive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 69 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 20-Aug-2002 1,596.11 313397C66 MAT 09/202002 20-Aug-2002 0.00 IT - 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,495.09 GNMA II POOL#0080023 20-Aug-2002 2,756.18 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/9 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,172.22 GNMA II POOL M080088M 20-Aug-2002 3,515.77 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 138,746.00 GNMA 11 POOL H080408X 20-Aug-2002 18,269.33 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DO 051011 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,858.85 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SEE 162 20-Aug-2002 13,858.85 3133T17A4 6.0000%11/152023 DD 11/01/9 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,911.93 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 20-Aug-2002 2,115.15 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04202030 DD 04/01/ 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 20-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTC ASSN MTN 21-Aug-2002 628.76 3136FOYW6 VAR RT 02/21/2003 DO 0821/ 21-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 21-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2001 13:50.16 Exemim WoPkbewh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 70 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG00010000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATFJ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINADSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 21-Aug-2002 2,175.00 97665SHM5 08212002 21-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 21-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 23-Aug-2002 495.83 5007M1HPI 0823/2002 23-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 23-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 26-Aug-2002 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500Yo09252018 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 26-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,375.69 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 27-Aug-2002 4,981.96 398108AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 0229/0 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 27-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 45,364.50 F14LMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 28-Aug-2002 6,838.83 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DO 121011 014u1-2002 0.00 IT 28-Aug-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 592,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 30-Aug-2002 1,422.44 313589D83 MAT 08/302002 30-Aug-2002 0.00 1T 30-Aug-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,030.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Aug-2002 14,030.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/152007 DD 011151 15-3ul-2002 0.00 IT 30-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep2002 13:50:16 Emcurme Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE..- 71 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-AUG-2002-31-AUG-2002 OCSDCOAWLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRRTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PRACO 3,363.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Aug-2002 3,363.00 9128274Y5 3.875%01/152009 DD 01/151 15-Ju1-2002 0.00 IT 30-Aug-2002 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 688A5 WMPMUNTOON PAIGE 8000-I 1150 30-Aug-2002 5,989.38 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DD 1012119 01-Aug-2002 0.00 IT 30-Aug-2002 0.00 12-Sep-2001 13:50:16 Faecutive Woikbzflt FAHR COMMITTEE m09/1802 roa/25/92 � 09/18/02 09/25/02 - in AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR02-82 19 E Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator. Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: Position revisions for the Engineering and Operations & Maintenance Departments _ GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Upgrade the following three positions for the Engineering Department and two positions for the Operations & Maintenance Department that were inadvertently not included during the FY02/03 budget process: 1. One vacant Construction Inspector position upgraded to an Engineer position 2. One vacant Project Specialist position upgraded to an Engineer position 3. One vacant Principal Engineering Associate position upgraded to an Engineer position 4. One Limited Term Contract Engineer position changed to a full-lime regular Senior Engineer 5. One Limited Term Contract Engineer position changed to a full-time regular Engineer SUMMARY During the FY02103 budget process, the Engineering Department submitted a number of decision packages to add new positions and reclassify existing positions with incumbents. In addition, Engineering submitted decision packages proposing changing the classification of three FTEs vacated by retirees to accommodate the reorganization of the Engineering Department. These upgrades were inadvertently not included in the final FY02/03 budget approved by the Board of Directors on June 26, 2002. The three upgrades are needed to provide engineering resources to meet the District's mission; including the planning, design and construction of facilities to meet the Board's directive to move to a higher level of treatment. The Engineering Department, as well as the General Manager, has since reviewed these three decision packages and determined that the need for these upgrades still exists. The request will not change the overall staffing numbers for the department. During the FY02/03 budget process, the Operations & Maintenance Department did not submit decision packages to convert two limited term positions to full-time regular positions.The original intent of hiring limited tens employees was to work on short-term (two to three years) projects.With the Board of Directors' decision on July 17"' to change the existing level of treatment from a blend of 50% advanced primary and 50% secondary treated wastewater to secondary treatment standards,the need for these limited term employees has been extended. Operations & Maintenance management and the General Manager believe the need will be on going and that it is appropriate to fill these positions with regular full-time employees. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The budgeted salaries for the vacant three positions for FY02103 were $200,000; the additional costs to upgrade the three positions are estimated to be $36,000. There are no additional salary and benefit costs associated with the change of the two limited term positions to full-time regular positions. BUDGET IMPACT This item has been budgeted. (Line item:wages and salaries) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES - N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A G:wftUpnda�rd agenda aeP VW2 eo mm�dan pma tem iatdi.P"Dw uaemaes d= am : eaou, Page 2 ATTACHMENT 1 - m Orange County Sanitation District Classlncatlons By Employee Group Professional Pay Hourly Monthly Annual Hourly Monthly Annual Range Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Maximum Classifications FLSA Stalls E14 36.243 6.282 $75,385 51.294 8,891 $106,692 Chief Scientist Exbm t E13 34.568 5,992 $71,901 48.888 8,474 $101,687 Senior Engineer Fxem 1 E12 32.932 5,708 $68,499 46.590 8,076 $96,907 Senior Scientist Exempt E12 32.932 5.708 $68,499 46.590 5,076 $96,907 Senior Regulatory Specialist Exempt E12 32.932 5.708 $60,499 46.590 8,076 $96.907 Principal Contracts Administrator Exempt E11 31.320 5,430 $65.164 44.323 7,693 $92,192 Engineer Exempt Ell 31.329 6,430 $65.164 44.323 7,683 $92.192 IT Strategic Implementation Leader Exempt E10 29.792 5,1 $61,967 1 42.201 7.315 $87.778 iSecretary to me Spend of Directors Exempt E9 28.432 4.928 $59.139 40.250 6.977 $83,720 Principal Administrative Analyst Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 583,720 PrinU al Engineering Associate Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6.977 $83.720 ProjectSpecialist Exempt E9 28.432 4.928 $59.139 40.250 6,977 $83,720 Regulatory Specialist Exempt E9 28.432 4.928 $59.139 40.250 6,977 $83,720 Scientist Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 $83.720 Principal Accountant Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 $83,720 Principal Financial Analyst Exempt E8 27.039 4,687 $56,241 38.261 6.632 $79,683 Associate Engineer III Exempt E8 27.039 4.687 1 $56.241 38.251 1 6.632 $79.583 Principal Environmental Specialist Exem t Eli 27.039 4,687 $56.241 38,281 6,632 $79,583 Safitty 8 Emergency Response Specialist Exempt E7 25.755 4,409 $53,633 36.466 6,324 $75,891 JPrograrnmer Analyst Exempt E7 25.785 4.469 $53.633 36.486 6,324 $75,891 Computer Herdmre Specialist Exa t E7 25.785 4,469 $53.633 36.486 6,324 $75.891 Telepmnmunications Specialist Exempt E7 25.785 4,469 $53.633 36.486 6,324 $75.891 Maintenance Planner Exempt E7 25.785 4,469 $53.633 36.486 6,324 $75,891 Contracts Administrator Exempt Ell 24.537 4,253 $51,037 34.706 8.016 $72,188 Principal Lab..Ww 8 Research Analyst Exempt Ee 24.537 4.253 $51.037 34.706 5,016 $72,180 Senior Administrative Analyst Exempt E5 23.380 4,053 $48,630 33.070 5,732 568,786 Associate Engineer II Exempt E5 23.380 4,053 $48.630 33.070 5.732 $68.786 Senior Accountant Exempt ES 23.380 4.053 $40,630 33.070 5.732 $68,786 Senior Financial Analyst •Exempt ES 23.380 4,053 $48,630 33.070 5,732 $68,786 Senlor Environmental Specialist Exempt E4 22.271 3.860 546,324 31.539 5.467 $65,601 Safety Representative Exempt E4' 22.271 3,860 $46.324 31.539 5.457 $65,601 Programmer Exempt E4 22,271 3,860 $46,324 31.539 5,467 $65,601 Senior Buyer Exempt E3 21.185 3,672 544,065 30.004 5,201 $62,408 Associate Engineer I Exempt E2 20.214 3.504 $42,045 28,576 4,953 $59,438 Contracts Specialist Exempt Ell 19.203 3,329 $39.942 27.249 4,723 $56,678 Accountant Exempt E1 19.203 3.329 $39.942 27.249 4,723 $56,678 Buyer Exempt E1 19.203 1 3,329 S39,942 27.249 4,723 $56,678 Financial Analyst Exempt E1 19.203 3,329 $39,942 27.249 4,723 $66,678 Management Analyst Exem FAHR COMMITTEE M%bngDBte Toee.or0o-. 08/18/02 O91 1 2 �+� AGENDA REPORT RemNumil HemNUMM - _ FANR02-83 14(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: Establishing an Internal Audit Function GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to solicit proposals from auditing firms for Internal Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2002-10813D; and, Direct staff to recommend three finalists to be interviewed by the FAHR Committee, and subsequently awarded by the Board of Directors at a future meeting. SUMMARY In the recent past, various limited internal control, operational, and performance reviews have been conducted under the direction of the FAHR Committee, as follows: 1994 — Extensive internal control review conducted by KPMG Peat Marwick; 1995—Operational and Performance review conducted by Ernst&Young; • 1997 — Purchasing &Warehousing operational review conducted by Global Engineering and Management; • 1999 — Internal Controls Policy and Practices update report by Finance staff; and 2000 —Operational and Performance review conducted by DMG Maximus; The District currently does not have an established internal audit function. The Government Finance Officers Association defines the role of the internal audit function as to ensure that a government's internal control structure is properly designed and is functioning efficiently and effectively. In fulfilling that role, the internal audit function itself becomes an integral part of a sound internal control structure. The Institute of Internal Auditors, an organization that serves over 75,000 members in internal auditing, governance and internal control, IT audit, education, and security from more than 100 countries, states that every organization, regardless of size, should have some type of internal auditing function or process to ensure that effective controls are in place to mitigate enterprise-wide risk. In a large organization, it can be as extensive as an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity, that is professionally staffed, and that evaluates risk management, control, and the governance processes. The structure of the internal auditing function may run from assigning someone part-time responsibilities for internal auditing, to reliance on procedures performed periodically by G:AW dlalagenda,BCald AGendx Renal BmN Agenda FROWSA Mem 141e)internal Aum Senecas ee[ aa„e.: B 10AI. Page 1 third party providers, to establishing a professionally staffed, in-house internal auditing group. Y Staff is recommending that the internal audit function for the District be contracted out for the following reasons: • True independence can be established by an outside auditing firm that reports directly to the Audit Committee (FAHR). • Staff believes that the concentrated efforts by outside professionals on a 500 - 1,000 hour engagement annually would be more cost efficient then adding one or two full-time employees. Staff is requesting the FAHR Committee to approve the selection of outside independent auditors to provide the District with internal auditing services and to: 1. Direct staff to solicit proposals 2. To narrow the selection to three finalists 3. Conduct final interviews with the finalists at a future FAHR Committee Meeting or establish a FAHR sub-committee to conduct the interviews PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The District currently has $30,000 budgeted for outside auditing services beyond the scope of the annual financial audit within the FY 2002-03 budget. Staff believes that contracting for annual internal auditing services is very likely to exceed this amount. If necessary, staff will request additional funding once an outside auditing firm has been selected, and the cost of the agreed upon scope of services has been determined. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See the attached Staff Report on Internal Audit Function. ALTERNATIVES 1. Consider hiring additional full-time employees to serve on an internal audit team. 2. Consider continuing current practices GW N1Bvgz W Rroms12001 Bove nB^d �W9�SItem,<lelhWWAnti,Se,Nxs.Ooc Re . vmse Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report on Internal Audit Function. G:hgnuNpmm\Bm�a ngenm necortvwox emN npenm nsoammSONien 1�1e)Inlanel Autil Sen+m.aac Ao-nme� diasa Page 3 b o September 17, 2CO2 STAFF REPORT - INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION Internal Auditino Defined The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), an organization that serves over 75,000 members in internal auditing, governance and internal control, IT audit, education, and security from more than 100 countries, states that internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, internal control, and governance processes. The Governmental Finance Officers Association defines the role of the internal audit function as to ensure that a government's internal control structure is properly designed and is functioning efficiently and effectively. In fulfilling that role, the internal audit function itself becomes an integral part of a sound internal control structure. Internal Controls Management is responsible for protecting the District's assets and for ensuring the integrity, accuracy and comprehensiveness of the books and financial reports. The policies and procedures established by staff to meet these goals, as well as the overall "control environment"at the District, make up our internal control structure. The independent financial auditors are required to report to the FAHR Committee on the adequacy of our internal controls each year. Examples of good internal controls include segregation of duties, where no one person is in a position to both commit and to conceal an irregularity; controlled access to assets and records; use of pre-numbered documents and independent checks of performance, like bank reconciliations and physical inventories. Independent financial auditors test our internal control structure and practices during each audit. An important advantage of a sound internal control structure is that it can reduce the amount of transaction testing that the auditor must perform. This timesavings can be used to reduce the audit cost or increase the scope of services for the same cost. For example, if there were poor internal controls in the accounts receivable area, the auditor would need to perform extensive tests of receivable balances and accounts to support an opinion. These tests would take additional time that would increase the cost of the audit. Generally accepted auditing standards require that auditors make - management aware of any significant deficiencies in internal controls. O 1) PO.B %9127 Fa bti Vela y,CA 927] 127 (714)%2-24II Internal Audit Function Page 2 of 6 September 17, 2002 Need for An Internal Auditing Function According to IIA, every organization, regardless of size, should have some type of internal auditing function or process to ensure that effective controls are in place to mitigate enterprise-wide risk. Members of management, the Board, and the Audit Committee should have enough information and confidence to be able to respond affirmatively to the questions presented below through the use of an established fully functioning and appropriately governed internal auditing function: • Am I comfortable that all risks have been appropriately addressed? • Is there a process or function within the organization responsible for assessing and monitoring risk? • Do I have assurance that controls are operating as planned? • Is there a thorough and appropriate reporting mechanism within the organization that allows for an adequate checks and balances system for fraud prevention and risk management? • Do I have assurance that financial and other information is reported correctly? • Are risk management, control, and governance processes being evaluated and reviewed for efficiency and effectiveness on an ongoing basis? • Do I have a clear understanding of enterprise-wide risk and the organization's key areas of vulnerability? • Does the organization have an operational system for managing risk? • Is there an internal process within the organization for adding value to and improving operations? • Is the public provided with reliable assurances that their taxes and fees are safeguarded and used judiciously? Factors to be considered in determining the need for an Internal audit function include Board Members' expectations, risk tolerance levels, public or legal requirements, and the size and complexity of the organization and its operations. Size factors considered might include assets, revenue, expenses, liquidity and location of assets, number of locations of operating facilities, number of employees, and volume of activity. The Directors may simply need to ask themselves whether they have reliable assurance that financial and other information is correctly reported, whether controls and procedures are functioning as planned, and whether programs are meeting expectations. Establishing an Internal Audit Function In a large organization, an Intemal Audit Function can be as extensive as an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity, that is professionally staffed, and that evaluates risk management, control, and the governance processes. The structure of the intemal audi ing function may run from assigning someone part-time responsibilities for internal auditing, to reliance on procedures performed periodically by third party providers, to establishing a professionally staffed, in-house internal auditing group. To establish an internal audit function for the District, staff is recommending that this service be contracted out for the following reasons: Internal Audit Function b` Page 3 of 6 - September 17,2002 • True independence can be established by an outside auditing firm that reports directly to the Audit Committee(FAHR). • Staff believes that the concentrated efforts by outside professionals on a 500 - 1,000 hour engagement annually would be more cost efficient then adding one or two full-time employees. Recently Performed Internal Control. Operational, and Performance Reviews Extended Internal Control Review, 1994 In 1994 the Board of Directors hired KPMG Peat Marwick to conduct an extended review of the District's internal controls. This work was in addition to the review that they conducted annually as a part of the audit process. While such reports are naturally critical, the KPMG report included background information and internal control strengths that were already in place. The KPMG recommendations were generally on target and almost all of them were rapidly implemented. The review and report were quite comprehensive and is not summarized here because of its length. However, the topics that were covered included: • Development of investment policies and procedures • Credit ratings of financial counterparties • Use of wire transfers of funds when appropriate • A financial securities monitoring system • Blank check stock • Petty cash responsibilities and procedures • Payroll system changes and payroll adjustments • Time card input to the payroll and job cost process • Training and travel advance policies • Gift acceptance policies • Procurement and construction project processes • Job cost accounting • Sale of permits, plans and specifications • Cash collection security • Internal audit committee This report was delivered by KPMG staff to the Fiscal Policy Committee, the Executive Committee and the full Board of Directors. Performance& Operational Audit, 1995 In 1995, the Board hired Ernst& Young to perform a performance and operational audit of the Finance Department. This work was a part of a very broad, multi-phase performance and operational audit and management review of the entire agency. Eventually all of the departments and functions were studied during this process. - Ernst& Young proposed to identify and document the processes that Finance performs. They emphasized Finance's role in supporting the operational and administrative needs Internal Audit Function I Page 4 of 6 - V September 17, 2002 of the District including internal controls, treasury management, cost accounting and financial management functions. They investigated what systems Finance used and how people were organized and utilized. They reviewed the three areas that were then in the department, Accounting & Revenue, Purchasing &Warehousing and Information Services. The goal of the review was to identify opportunities to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The Ernst &Young report was issued in July 1995, and was presented to an ad hoc Committee, the FAHR Committee, the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors. This report is over 100 pages long. The areas of focus are listed below: • Staffing • Formal and informal bids • Purchase order process • Inventory re-order process • Receiving & "shipping" • Inventory management • Warehouse space • Financial information system • Policies & procedures manuals • Financial & budgetary reporting • Payroll processes • Deferred compensation • User billing process • Internal audit program Included in the report were comparisons with"best practices agencies" and recommended action plans. Those recommendations that were approved by the Directors were implemented or started within 6 months. Performance & Operational Audit, 1999 During 1999 and early 2000, District staff conducted performance and operational audits on various components of the organization. In large part these audits and the staff to conduct them were a result of the recommendations in the Ernst& Young report mentioned above. For various reasons, the outside independent management- consulting firth of DMG-Maximus was selected by a competitive process to conduct the review of the Finance Department. This audit spanned a period of 12 months from award to final report. The purpose of the audit was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the Finance Department's business practices, policies and procedures, staffing levels and transaction processes with the goal of increasing operational efficiency and organizational effectiveness. After completing an organizational profile to document their understanding of the department and a risk assessment report to evaluate management and financial controls and standards for productivity, the consultants established six audit objectives: • Conduct a status review of the financial information system implementation ' Internal Audit Function Page 5 of 6 e September 17, 2002 • Evaluate the structure and staffing levels to move from "transactions processing"to "decision support" • Identify methods to simplify labor-intensive activities • Assess reasonableness of warehouse inventory and staffing level_ • Develop a comprehensive performance measurement system for the department • Identify instances of failure to meet needs of other departments and evaluate need _ for corrective action As the internal audits of the other departments were conducted in-house by staff and were used in-house by staff to increase efficiencies or to correct deficiencies, this report by a consulting firm was treated in the same manner. All of the internal audits were performed at the direction of the General Manager and the Assistant General Managers and the reports were given to them for implementation. The recommendations of this report were implemented where feasible. Limited Procedures Reviews In addition to these major audits and reviews, a few other limited procedure reviews have been conducted. In November 1999, the FAHR Committee reviewed a Finance Department staff report on internal controls over payroll, cash receipts, cash disbursements and treasury management. This was an informational report and no action was taken. The report included copies of the written internal control policies and practices that were noted. In September 1997, the Adaptive Work Force Team of the District Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) hired the firth of Global Engineering and Management to evaluate the purchasing and warehousing practices. This special review was a part of the overall DART effort to better integrate the operations and maintenance functions. As a result of this work the field staff became more aware of the complexities of a purchasing and warehousing system and the need for policies, procedures and rules. The Purchasing &Warehousing staff is working very closely with the DART efforts today and changes continue to be made on both sides of the counter. Recommended Areas to Be Considered in Future Internal Audits Although staff has no knowledge of any improprieties or irregularities within the accounting or operational activities of the District, following are typical areas the - Committee may want to consider in future internal audits: • Revenue collection • Contract Management • Proper billings to end users, including permittees • Expenditures conform to District Ordinances, Resolutions, policies and procedures • Employee Expense Reports conform to Board Ordinances and Resolutions _ • Employee Salaries and Benefits conform to Board Ordinances and Resolutions _ • Credit Card purchases conform to policies and procedures • District Contributions are Board approved • District memberships conform to policies and procedures Internal Audit Function Page 6 of 6 September 17,2002 Summary _Staff is recommending that a District internal audit function be formally established through the use of external independent auditors and that staff be directed to solicit proposals from outside auditing firths to serve as the District's internal auditors. Staff is also proposing to narrow the selection search down to three finalists and to schedule interviews of these three finalists for final selection by FAHR, the District's Audit Committee. MDW G:\wp.dl X int22OWh0e1FAHRAudKMnWmal Audh Fundion.doc FAHR COMMITTEE MeebgDae Tom.orar. 09/17/02 09/25ro2 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR02-84 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator. Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: Increase Funding Approval for the Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study, Phase II and III, with Carollo Engineers GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve a budget amendment of$171,073 for Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study, Phase II and III, for a total budget of$294,500; and, 2. Authorize staff to issue a change order to the purchase contract issued to Carollo Engineers, for an additional amount of$37,600, for a total amount not to exceed $150,600. SUMMARY In June 1999, four agencies, consisting of the Sacramento Regional Sanitation District, CA, City of Reno, NV, the City and County of Honolulu, HI, and the District, agreed to participate in conducting and funding Phase I of the Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study coordinated by Carollo Engineers. The purpose of the study is to: • develop a uniform basis for comparing results based on standardized data obtained from uniform collection, sampling, and quality assurance/quality control methods. • reduce overall costs due to the sharing of agency staff, and outside laboratory and consultant services to achieve a common program goals and objectives. • develop a more comprehensive and representative database due to larger number and range in size of businesses available for evaluation in each commercial category. • share ideas among the agencies for developing equitable commercial classifications and improving billing methodologies. • enhance credibility of the study results because of the number of participating agencies, comprehensive database, substantial peer review and anticipated adoption of the results by the California State Water Resources Control Board. Phase I consisted of developing an Action Plan for defining the goals and objectives for the program and the recommended approach to achieve those goals and objectives. G:1�Eaapen0a1eW14 ABlMi Rryy1S300$Bplp ApinEd glpvb'MpNl.11(� dO FApmgS.OZ A-1.: save Page 1 Following are the goals that were established at the collective Visioning Workshop of the participating agencies: • Develop a simplified, equitable and defensible commercial user billing method. • Improve customer service and agency image with commercial establishments. • Streamline the rates and fees assessment process for commercial accounts. The objectives developed to support the above listed goals are as follows: • Develop a scientifically supported database as a basis for the commercial billings. • Pool resources to reduce costs and improve the usefulness of the data developed. • Incorporate regulatory agency review to enhance credibility of the program. • Develop methods to account for converted and relocated commercial users. • Sell the database to interested agencies to help recover costs. Phase II of the project will be to complete the Field Reference, conduct the field sampling/laboratory testing, and develop a database. This includes reduction and analysis, quality assurance/quality control, and database design. Phase III will evaluate alternative commercial billing methods through a workshop process involving agency participants, and will result in one (or several) recommended scientifically based methodologies for setting wastewater rates and fees for commercial categories. Institutional, legal and financial requirements will also be considered and incorporated in the identification and development of the alternatives. In June 2002, the City of Reno, Nevada discontinued its participation in this project. The City of Reno's funding contribution was from three sources, themselves, the City of Sparks, Nevada, and the County of Washoe, Nevada. Due to financial hardship, the City of Sparks, Nevada first discontinued its financial participation, and the City of Reno, Nevada and the County of Washoe, Nevada declined to carry the additional funding burden left to them from the City of Sparks, Nevada. As a result of the reduction of the number of participants from four to three, each remaining participant is required to increase its portion of the professional engineering services by 33.3 percent, or$37,632 to $150,528. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Previous Cost Incurred: Carollo Engineers Professional Services Contract- Phase 1 $ 10,427 OCSD Administration 10,475 Previous Cost Subtotal 20,902 G'kp EbWJery\ dApnU Rp0}b Z�MAp Hlyb'09JN11m 14(01 0Eprena.Ox R .O. &1W Page 2 Projected Future Costs: Carollo Engineers Professional Services Contract- Phase II & III Prior Board Approval 113,000 Change Order No. 1 37600 Total Carollo Engineers 150,600 Equipment- 7 Samplers and 9 Meter Readers 38,950 OCSD Labor- Field Sampling 39,000 OCSD Labor- Laboratory Analysis 10,100 OCSD Administration 10,000 Subtotal Projected Future Costs 248,650 Estimated Contingency on Future Costs 24,948 Total Projected Future Cost 273,598 Total Projected Cost 294,500 Amount Previously Approved 123,427 Total Additional Funding Requested BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: cortF Misc. Projects) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Commercial Categories and Wastewater Characteristics To Be Assessed in Phase II During Phase I, a review and comparison of existing commercial categories was initially conducted to develop groupings of similar categories in terms of wastewater characteristics, and to identify new commercial businesses to be considered. Categories to be assessed were selected based on relative financial impact on the agencies, estimated strength and flow variability of businesses within the categories, and sensitivity of the category to modifications in assumed wastewater billing factors. The four agencies included in this study decided that restaurants, including sit down, take out, and fast food, and motels/hotels should be the first priority for evaluation since these two categories were major billing categories for all of the agencies involved in the study. Restaurants are high strength that typically results in high rates and fees. Many recent changes in the hotel/motel industry in required water conservation features and food preparation services have resulted in increased wastewater strength. GW.eu�,eove AW.neportsVom ewro npertt am�+woNwm, ln caoio[.gnea .mc �.: d,� Page 3 The wastewater characteristics to be evaluated in the program include flow, suspended solids, and oxygen demand. These characteristics define the basic parameters used to allocate costs among commercial categories within a revenue program. Two methods for estimating oxygen demand are included in the program, the five-day biochemical oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand-filterable. The California State Regional Water Control Board has requested that both samples be collected for each site to provide flexibility in using the results by agencies using either method. Once the effectiveness of the testing/sampling program for restaurants and hotels/motels is completed and, after determining the impacts of any additional potential costs, a second priority listing of categories will be considered for evaluation including car washes, shopping centers, entertainment(churches, auditoriums, theaters, bars, and bowling alleys), gyms/health clubs, hospitals/medical/dental offices, and petroleum dischargers (auto dealers, repair shops, and oil change shops). PHASE II - DATA GATHERING ANALYSIS Field Sampling & Sampling Equipment The selection of specific commercial sites for sampling within each agency is planned as part of the Phase II activities. The selection process involves conducting a telephone and mail survey to obtain crucial information from the targeted sampling population, followed by a field survey of those selected businesses. After review of the sampling program needs and the results of the telephone and mail survey, each agency will review the individual commercial businesses recommended for sampling. The field survey will also provide additional data on activities affecting discharge characteristics. Each agency is responsible for managing internal resources or procuring local contracted services for field activities. The Action Plan Field Reference will describe the sampling standards, testing methods and protocols for all of the fieldwork. This standardization is critical in developing a comprehensive database to all agencies. Carollo Engineers will coordinate the field activities, as necessary, to ensure that the sampling program is accurately being followed. The Action Plan outlines a six-month sampling effort for the program. This length of study will allow for analysis of seasonal variations for selected categories, such as hotels and motels, that are influenced by seasonal factors. In addition to metered,water readings, this study will also require the use of both flowmeters and automatic samplers. Flowmeters are required to keep daily flow records and pace sample collection. Automatic samplers are required for actual sample collections. The automatic samplers will be used to collect discrete samples in 24 separate bottles at each sampling location. The sampler will be programmed to take flow paced samples. The specifications for the required flow meters and samplers will be provided in the Field Reference, which will serve as the basis for bidding the field sampling services. c weVdaMm,emenpma.neoau�zwz a NRoeW pery,labo]N:em�.�n6NIe Fnyme,.me Page 4 Laboratory Services and Quality Assurance Each agency will also be responsible for managing internal resources or procuring local contracted services for all laboratory work, with the assistance of Carollo Engineers in developing the request for proposals. The Implementation Plan describes the analytical standards, methods and protocol for all of the laboratory work. Analytical standardization is required in developing a comprehensive database for the agencies. Laboratory quality assurance/quality control procedures will be established to assess the quality of the data generated by the contract laboratory. In addition, field quality assurance/quality control will be maintained by conducting a series of unscheduled checks of sampling methods and procedures. Database Management Carollo is responsible for the development, construction, maintenance, and quality assurance/quality control of the comprehensive database of the testing results. The agencies and contract laboratories will input the analytical results via the internal to the central database. The database will be created using a simple and universal program, such as Microsoft Access, that will accept data files from a variety of programs that the laboratories might employ. Database security will be installed to prevent unauthorized read/write access, as well as to provide multi-leveled access among authorized users. The participating agencies will have unlimited access to the database for reports and charts, future updates, customer service relations, or other review purposes either with a CD-ROM package or via the intemet. PHASE III—COMMERCIAL BILLING METHOD ALTERNATIVES/RECOMMENDATIONS Phase III involves the review and evaluation of commercial user billing methods in order to develop recommendations to improve the commercial user billing system for each participating agency. Phase III will also include an updated survey of the commercial billing methods of other similar wastewater agencies. The objective of this survey is to develop a comparison of existing and proposed wastewater sewer service rates and charges for the District to rates and charges of similar wastewater agencies in California. The recommendations for the commercial billing practices will aid in developing more simplified, equitable and defensible billing structures. In addition, Phase III will focus on recommendations in streamlining the collection process and accounting for relocated users. The database will provide the necessary scientific basis for the revised billing structure, and also improve the customer service image by providing the agencies proper support in answering inquiries by commercial users. Phase III will also include an investigation as to the potential economic impact from changes in the commercial billing structures. r+ANAwu •px Aqs Nepubesomem umudnr„omms.arc n..u.e: Wn Page 5 ALTERNATIVES n None CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS None c:a ftn geaa�naaae Rewu W2 RepaueWMw ia(n a men E, mam Ream: Wl, Page 6 i -T MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT August 12, 2002, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on August 12, 2002. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Iry Pickier, Chairman Shirley McCracken Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr. Brian Donahue, Alternate No. 1 Kathrvn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Brian Brady, Alternate No. 2 Jan Flory, Alternate No. 2 Laurann Cook, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Staff: Directors: Kelli Bum-Roy, Dick Corneille, Blake Anderson Jan Debay Vasken Missidian — Camp Dresser 8 McKee Inc. Lisa Murphy Wes Bannister Abdul Rashidi—Montgomery Watson Harza Bob Ooten Denis Bilodeau Annette McCluskey—NCG PorterNovelli Wendy Sevenandt Staff: Richard Bell - IRWD Virginia Grebbien Dennis MacLain — City of Huntington Beach Counsel: Debra Bums Patrick Scanlon — So CA Water Co. Brad Hogin Steve Conklin John Collins— City of Fountain Valley Joanne Daugherty Peter Wolfson — USFilter Control Systems Shivaji Deshmukh Randy Fuhnnan - Huntington Beach Bill Everest Heidi Thurau, Donna Carter- Jill Everhart Johnson Ukropina Jenny Glasser Steve Tedesco— Tetra Tech Inc. Clark Ide John Kennedy Mike Markus Rafael Mujeriego Mehul Patel Lily Pham Jana Safarik Laura Thomas Ron Wildermuth - 1 - t Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes August 12, 2002 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Pickler introduced and welcomed Shirley McCracken, Councilwoman of Anaheim, and the new chairperson for OCSD's Board of Directors, who will serve on the Committee as a regular member. (OCSD's alternate members are: Director Donahue, Altemate No. 1 (replaces Director Anderson); Director Brady, Alternate No. 2; and Director Cook, Altemate No. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Meetina Upon motion duly made by Director Kraemer, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried with Director McCracken abstaining, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held July 6, 2002 were approved as mailed. Director Patterson requested that the general managers give their reports first presenting an update on the Joint Operations and Maintenance (O&M)Agreement. REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGERS OCWD General Manager Virginia Grebbien responded to a letter from Director Patterson requesting the status of the Joint Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement be presented. She reported that she and OCSD General Manager Blake Anderson have met several times and will meet again this week before meeting with districts' attorneys on August 21. She stated that OCSD has requested that the JCC schedule an extra meeting on August 26 specifically for the O&M Agreement and further that some JCC directors had requested that she and Mr. Anderson have the Agreement ready for consideration at the September 9 Committee meeting. She noted that several issues have been addressed in the current draft agreement including: share of capital costs; that major O&M costs will be bom by OCWD but OCSD would pay the incremental O&M costs associated with wet-weather treatment; OCWD will guarantee100 mgd wet-weather capacity; and both districts will share the risk of emerging contaminants either through capital and/or O&M expenditures. She noted that the agreement should only address Phase 1 of the project providing: a clarification in capital expenditures; determination of facilities to be built; cost sharing responsibility; and that both agencies share construction risk. She noted that other issues within the agreement to be discussed are: the critical warranty that OCWD provides to OCSD in terms of O&M performance for buying wet- weather capacity and how it is measured; contracting authority; and term of the Agreement. Mr. Anderson stated OCSD's concern is the issue of operational readiness and how is it going to be guaranteed and exhibited by OCWD for the term of the Agreement; the - 2 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes 9 August 12, 2002 importance of the two Boards to remain committed to the Agreement; the obligation of OCSD to provide secondary effluent or Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) imported water to OCWD; and OCWD must offer facilities or OCSD will have relief. He noted that the Committee approved Draft 27 of the Agreement in January 2002. Director Patterson requested that remaining issues for each agency pertaining to O&M Agreement be outlined and presented to the Committee at the August 26 meeting. OCSD District Counsel Brad Hogin reported that when the Agreement is signed, it would be contractually binding on future boards. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Bids for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline Proiect Mike Markus, Program Construction Manager, recommended approval to solicit bids for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline. He reported that the pipeline is needed early to transport interim MWD water for four to five years from Adams Street for interim barrier injection. He noted that the completion of the project is scheduled for July 2003. He noted that the engineer's estimate is $3.3 million with bids due on September 19 and that the results will be presented to the Committee and the OCWD Board in October for the award of contract. He noted that all easements and permits have been acquired; the pipeline will be located parallel to the Green Acres Project pipeline; and is about 200 yards west of the river. Director Patterson asked if the cost of MWD water will be paid by OCWD. Mr. Markus responded affirmatively. Mr. Anderson, with Mr. Hogin's concurrence, stated that there is no joint agreement inclusive of construction and that both Boards will need to approve the contract award. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony seconded by Director McCracken and carried unanimously, the Committee: A. Approved the Southeast Barrier Pipeline plans and specifications; B. Authorized the OCWD general manager to solicit bids for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline; and - 3 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes August 12, 2002 Y C. Agendize award of the contract for October 16 OCWD Board Meeting and October 23 OCSD Board Meeting. 3. Requests for Proposal (RFP) for Pre-selection of the Process Control System Program Manager Bill Everest and OCWD Engineer Laura Thomas gave a report and presentation on the process of selecting the two firms considered to receive the requests for proposals for the Process Control System. She reported that the proposals will brought to the Committee and both Boards in October for approval. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Patterson and carried unanimously, the Committee authorized: A.) Approval of the Requests for Proposals (RFP) to pre-select a Process Control System Supplier; and B.) Confirmed that the top two candidates from the previous qualification evaluation, Emerson/Westinghouse Process Controls (Delta V) and US Filter Controls/Honeywell (Plantscape), will receive the RFP. 4. Addendum No. 6 to Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Mr. Everest reported that several design and responsibility changes have created a decrease in the scope of work to Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. and recommended a change order to decrease the amount of their Professional Services Agreement by $2,945,100. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion duly made by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried unanimously, staff is authorized to issue Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement No. 201414 with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., decreasing the authorized amount by $2,945,100, from $35,890,804 to an amount not exceed $32,945,704, for changes in the Scope of Work. (Credit to be shared equally between OCWD and OCSD.) Agendize for the September 4 OCWD Board meeting and the September 25 OCSD Board meeting. 5. Property Acquisition for an Easement at Faith Lutheran Church for Wellsite 1-30 Mr. Markus reported that temporary construction easements required for Well Site 1-30 is owned by Faith Lutheran Church at 8200 Ellis Avenue, Huntington Beach. He reported that the well site is needed to expand the Seawater Intrusion Barrier and recommended that the Committee approve the purchase of the easement. -4 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes '( August 12,2002 Upon motion by Director Eckenrode, seconded by Director Anthony and carried unanimously, the Committee authorized the OCWD General Manager to: A. Obtain the easements from the Faith Lutheran Church, 8200 Ellis Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA, for the GWR System in the amount of$98,560 plus escrow charges; and B. Execute purchase agreements all in a manner meeting approval of General Counsel. Agendize for the September 4 OCWD Board to accept the deed to the easements. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 6. Public Information and Education Update Mr. Ron Wildermuth reported that we are participating in environmental research studies that are being conducted as a framework to create a document of basic information of public trust in using recycled water products and that it would be a model for outreach programs. He also reported that another study is being developed by the American Water Works Association to bring the medical and water community together. He introduced Heidi Thurau and Donna Carter of Johnson Ukropina, a subcontractor of NCG Porter Novell, who gave a presentation on the projected advertising campaign of the project. Mr. Wildermuth stated that a report will be brought back to the Committee with specific costs on the new advertising campaign. Director Eckenrode commended Cindy Ferch, OCWD Public Relations Specialist, for her presentation given to an environmental committee of the Southern California Association of Governments and that they have since passed a resolution in support of the GWR System. REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGERS (CONTINUATION) Mr. Anderson reported that: A. OCSD will be disinfecting effluent with sodium hypochlorite in accordance with the schedule approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and dechlorinating with sodium bisulfite at both OCSD plants; B. The OCSD Board approved compliance with secondary treatment standards; and C. An electrical accident at Plant No. 2 injured several workers, but thanks to OCSD employees' emergency medical training (EMT), the injuries were treated properly and prevented a death. He noted that some OCSD employees have had emergency medical training, requiring 40-50 hours of training, and the emergency - 5 . Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes August 12, 2002 response team has been in operation for nine months. He recommended that any agency provide EMT training for operations. 7. Status Report Mr. Everest reported on the following: A. The rebundled schedule for the project now shows an operational date of November 2006 and that a more detailed report and schedule will be given at the Joint Board Meeting on August 21. B. The Public Utilities Commission's new exit fee policy will not directly affect the GWR System's unit cost, and projected power cost is still on target at approximately $.06/kWh. C. THE OCSD Board approved the contract for ultraviolet light disinfection equipment pre-selection to Trojan Technologies. D. The City of Fountain Valley will require no building permits or inspections and the traffic signal at the new entrance at Ward and Falcon Streets will be on the City's traffic commission agenda next month. Director Eckenrode asked about the status of the contract to the construction management team of Montgomery Watson Harza. Mr. Everest responded that the full contract had been awarded at the last OCWD Board meeting and the next additional block of work was specifically authorized under a task order for the next few months in amount of about$330,000, REPORT OF COUNSEL -No comments. DIRECTORS COMMENTS Director Patterson directed staff to send a status project report to Committee members every week via email. Director Anthony noted that the schedule has slipped behind a year and needs more discussion. Ms. Grebbien responded that an in depth report on project schedule will be given along with a cost update at the Joint Board Meeting on August 21. Director Bannister requested that the next Draft 0&M Agreement be sent to Committee members for review at least six days before the meeting when it will be discussed. - 6 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes i August 12,2002 GPAC COMMENTS — No comments. The Committee adjourned to Closed Session at 6:48 p.m. pursuant to provisions of: A. Govemment Code Section 54956.9(a)to confer with Counsel regarding existing litigation, namely, 1) Pall Corporation v. OCWD - Superior Court Case No. 02CC06622. B. Govemment Code Section 54956.8 to confer with real estate negotiators, Mike Markus, Shivaji Deshmukh, Bill Everest, and Virginia Grebbien, concerning the real estate negotiations regarding real property located at: 8121 Ellis Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92646. The Committee reconvened to Open Session at 7:20 p.m. whereupon General Counsel Clark Ida announced that no action was taken in Closed Session. ADJOURNMENT A Joint OCWD/OCSD Board Meeting will be held on August 21, at 6:00 p.m. at the Orange County Sanitation District Administrative Offices. The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, August 26 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. - 7 - MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT August 26, 2002, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on August 26, 2002. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair Iry Pickier, Chairman Shirley McCracken Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr. Brian Donahue,Alternate No. 1 Kathryn Ban,Alternate No. 1 Brian Brady,Alternate No. 2 Brett Franklin,Alternate No. 3 Laurann Cook,Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors Directors: Kelli Bum-Roy, Dick Corneille, Steve Anderson Jan Debay — Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Paul Walker Wes Bannister Abdul Rashidi— Montgomery Watson Harza Dennis MacLain— City of Huntington Beach Staff: Staff: George Martin—City of Anaheim Blake Anderson Virginia Grebbien Patrick Lynch-Dickstein Shapiro Morin&0shinsky, LLP David Ludwin Debra Bums Bob Ooten Steve Conklin Wendy Sevenandt Joanne Daugherty Shivajt Deshmukh Counsel: Jill Everhart Brad Hogin Clark Ida Anthony Manzano Mike Markus Mehul Patel Lily Pham Ron Wildermuth PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Meeting Upon motion duly made by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held August 12, 2002 were approved as mailed. - 1 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes August 26,2002 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the Development. Operation and Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment System and the Green Acres Proiect OCWD General Manager Virginia Grebbien introduced Mr. Patrick Lynch, Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP, Washington DC, who has been working with OCWD in conjunction with OCSD to complete the O&M Agreement. She reported that the agreement is 99% complete and that there are no outstanding issues remaining to bring back to the JCC for their concurrence. She gave a presentation outlining the terms, cost, governance, contract approval process, flows, water quality, termination, and default issues. She noted that the completed draft of the Joint Powers Agreement would be available September 12. REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGERS— No comments. REPORT OF COUNSEL - No comments. DIRECTORS COMMENTS OCSD Director Walker stated that interaction is lacking in the current room setup. Director Pickler directed the general managers to work on a new setup. Director Anthony asked if a separate meeting with the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee is still needed. He suggested that the GPAC meetings combine with the Producers meetings. GPAC COMMENTS Mr. Dennis MacLain, City of Huntington Beach and member of the GPAC, agreed with Director Anthony and stated that he would approach the GPAC with this information. ADJOURNMENT The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, September 16 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. -2 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mmhn9 Dare TO ad.of Dir. 09/25/02 AGENDA REPORT 1�NurnAwr 1O0A15(c) tsc�t Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. decreasing the authorized amount by$2,945,100,from $35,890,804 to a total amount not to exceed $32,954,704, for a change in the Scope of Work in accordance with the Professional Services Agreement for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District sharing the deduct in an equal amount of$1,472,550. SUMMARY • On March 28, 2001, the Boards of Directors of the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District authorized Addendum No. 3 with, Dresser and McKee Inc. (CDM)for the final design, construction support services, and start-up services for the Groundwater Replenishment System, with two addenda being approved subsequently for design changes and cost of living increases. • Since November 2001, there have been nine changes to the final design contract with CDM. Eight of those changes involve increased fees, while one is a significant decrease in fees. Proposed Addendum No. 6 includes these nine changes. • In addition, the attached August 12, 2002, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)Agenda Item Submittal discusses possible changes that will necessitate a subsequent addendum at a future date. • The JCC recommends approval of Addendum No. 6 to the PSA with CDM, for a reduction in fees of$2,945,100. • Addendum No. 6 would decrease the CDM team's authorized budget from $35,890,804 to an amount not to exceed $32,945,704. Page 1 PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY + A decrease in the total authorization for Orange County Sanitation District's cost share in the amount of$1,472,550 is shown in the attached Budget Information Table. The authorization of expenditures is reduced, while the total project budget remains unchanged. BUDGETIMPACT - ® This item has been budgeted. (uneitem:2002-03 CAP Budget sec B.page 157) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the August 12, 2002, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors certified the Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001, Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002 and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. August 12, 2002, JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Addendum No. 6 to PSA with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. 3. PSA Status Report WTS:sa G1mg6WaMgenda Draft Report tJolnt Bwrdsgtem.GWR.add6.CDM.dcc aa:a¢aia, Page 2 Agenda Item #4 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: August 12, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: ($2,945,100) From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEOA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Bill Everest Subject: ADDENDUM NO. 6 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC. SUMMARY Since November 2001, there have been nine changes in our project that require action by the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee (JCC) and the Boards of Directors of both the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) to approve changes to the final design contract with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM). Eight of those changes involve increased fees, while one is a significant decrease in fees. In addition, your attention is called to other possible changes that will necessitate a subsequent addendum at a future date. At this time, staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM, in a credit of $2,945,100. If approved, Addendum No. 6 would decrease the CDM team's authorized budget from $35,890,804 to an amount not to exceed $32,945,704. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for the September 4 OCWD Board meeting and for the September 25 OCSD Board meeting. Recommend to OCWD/OCSD Boards: Approve and authorize issuance of Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., decreasing the authorized amount by $2,945,100, from $35,890,804 to an amount not to exceed $32,945,704, for changes in the Scope of Work. (Credit to be shared equally between OCWD and OCSD) BACKGROUND - 1 - Agenda Item #4 Since November 2001, several changes have occurred in the project that affect the Scope of Work approved by your Committee for CDM. Some have been initiated by staff requests, two have occurred at your direction, and one has resulted from a change in responsibilities during construction. All scope changes must be authorized and approved by your Committee, and both Boards of Directors must approve all changes in authorized funding for the work. DISCUSSION This report includes all of the changes that have occurred since November 2001 under the direction of your Committee which have affected the Scope of Work for the project designers, the CDM design engineering team. Based on staff negotiations with CDM, we recommend proceeding now with some of the changes to the CDM Scope of Work and budget, and deferring others. Following is a table that details the changes and the results of the negotiations. The nine changes are divided into two categories, design changes and responsibility changes. Negotiated Item Changes In JCC Date CDM Scope Budget A. Design Changes 1. Re-evaluation of alternative lime system layouts and determination of preferred option to comply with new City of Fountain Valley—required silo height limit of 46 feet $10,500 Feb 25, 2002 2. Additional survey and engineering services for revised site of injection Well No. 31 (relocated from residential property to Baptist Church property to minimize property acquisition costs) $9,500 Apr 22, 2002 3. Alternative alignment study and costs for potentially relocating Southeast Barrier Pipeline to City of Huntington Beach Arevalos Park or in the Santa Ana River flood control easement $5,000 Feb 25, 2002 4. Investigate VE recommendations to evaluate alternative street alignment to Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel alignment for GWR Pipeline Unit 3 $9,000 Feb 25, 2002 5. Sub-station foundation pile design, originally to be performed by SCE, but transferred to switchgear building foundation pile design $4,700 Dec 10, 2001 6. JCC requested cost evaluation of concrete tilt-up building siding vs. approved metal siding $6,500 Mar 11;2002 7. Integrated Information System (IIS) -Vision $32,000 Jan 25, 2002 -2 - Agenda Item #4 Negotiated Item Changes In JCC Date CDM Scope Budget 'Document; JCC requested alternative approach and phased implementation of the IIS, included several meetings with staff and a new document B. Pre-selection of Process Control System (PCS) - Approach to PCS selection has changed from selection by the System Integrator to pre-selection and assignment to the AWTF general contractor. Services include: Pre- qualification of PCS suppliers; detailed standards; RFP and performance based criteria development and preparation, evaluation of proposals and costs; and assistance in selecting the preferred PCS supplier $77,700 June 10, 2002 Subtotal—Design Changes $154,900 B. Res onsibilities Change 1. Re-assignment of System Integrator(SI) responsibilities from CDM to AWTF General Contractor GC $(3,100,000) Total—Addendum No. 6 $(2,945,100) ANALYSIS All of these items, with the exception of the System Integrator (SI) responsibilities, have been previously discussed with your Committee. The dates, discussions and any actions taken by the JCC are noted under"Prior Committee Actions' below. The SI has the responsibility to develop and deliver a working Integrated Information System (IIS). The SI scope and budget was originally included along with the GWR System design program. Staff now believes that the responsibility for the SI work should be reassigned to the AWTF general contractor. WHAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ADDENDUM Additional changes in the CDM scope and budget are currently being investigated by staff, and will be brought to the JCC at a subsequent meeting. These may include: • Reduction of program management services; • Reduction in bidding services resulting from combining and repackaging particular construction contracts; • Reduction in services during construction; • Reduction in IIS services; - 3 - I Agenda Item #4 ' • Reduction in special services (control loop diagrams), and • Potential cost-of-living increases due to schedule extensions PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS March 19, 2001 —Approval by JCC for Addendum No. 3 to CDM Professional Services Agreement, with the exception that structural, electrical, architectural and the computer systems integrator be competitively selected. March 28, 2001 — By action of both Boards, Addendum No. 3 to CDM Professional Services Agreement approved, Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee formed, and direction given to implement eleven Producer recommendations to extent possible. April 9, 2001 — Direction given by JCC to prepare a Request for Proposals for structural, electrical and architectural services and list of architects to include firms drawn from a wider area than the Orange County area for review by the Committee, with the proposals to be received by the Consultant Selection Subcommittee for final recommendation to the Joint Cooperative Committee. May 14, 2001 — Direction given by JCC to issue Request for Proposals for electrical, structural and architectural services, to proceed with review of the proposals, and to bring a recommendation for selection back to this Committee. June 11, 2001 — Proposals received and direction given by JCC for staff interview the structural engineering, architectural, and electrical engineering firms and meet with the Consultant Selection Subcommittee after all interviews have taken place. July 9, 2001 — JCC authorized selected electrical, structural, and architectural firms to include in CDM contract. July 9, 2001 — Staff presented issues causing delays to the design schedule. July 9, 2001 — Staff reported on potential well site location changes in the City of Huntington Beach. July 9, 2001 — Staff reported on relocating GWR System Team to temporary trailers. July 30, 2001 — Staff presented a revised project schedule with a six-month delay in the project. July 30, 2001 —The JCC approved staff recommendations on procurement procedures and design criteria for microfiltration (MF) and ultraviolet light disinfection. Design criteria recommended by staff included a change to incorporate the 6 mgd - 4 - 4 Agenda Item #4 temporary MF units into the permanent MF facilities, increasing the capacity from 80 to 86 mgd. August 13, 2001 — Staff presented modified design for power supply design at a project -cost savings and JCC authorized staff to negotiate an agreement with Southern California Edison for the modified design. September 10, 2001 — JCC authorized actions to construct and furnish temporary offices for the GWR System Team and construction management consultant. September 24, 2001 — JCC authorized staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM for changes in the Scope of Work. November 14, 2001 —Approval by JCC for Addendum No. 4 to CDM Professional Services Agreement February 25, 2002— JCC authorizes staff to proceed with alternate alignment studies for the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel segment of GWR System Unit III Pipeline, and a portion of the Southeast Barrier Pipeline. March 11, 2002—JCC requested staff to prepare a cost comparison of the recommended architectural design to a concrete tilt-up construction style. April22, 2002— JCC authorized staff to proceed with additional services for revised site of injection Well No. 31. May 13, 2002 - JCC approved Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM for cost-of-living increases, in accordance with the contract provisions. June 10, 2002— JCC authorized staff to proceed with developing an RFP to pre-select a Process Control System manufacturer. G:W91Dba1Agenda D2fl Reponsuoint BnWsltem.attach 2 GWR.add6,Wm.dac - 5 - Professional Services Agreement Status Report Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36 Total Project Budget: $201,206,000 Consultant: Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. Start Date of Project: May 1994 Date Addendum Description Cost: Accumulated Costs 7/15/99 Original PSA Provide engineering services for the Project Development Phase of the $4,810,300 Groundwater Replenishment System consisting of preparing design memoranda to the 30%design level. 3/15/2000 1 Provide additional engineering services for costs containment work. $ 172,650 $4,982,950 Provide engineering services for the early design of a section of the GWR 1/24/2001 2 Pipeline to be installed prior to Sheriff Department construction work along $ 56,970 $5,039,920 Santa Ana River levy. 3/28/2001 3 Provide engineering services for the final design, construction and start up of $29 924 187 $34 964 107 the Groundwater Replenishment System. Provide engineering services 11 changes including selection of sub- 12/19/2001 4 consultants,transformer design, relocation of temporary MF to permanent $ 369,000 $35,333,107 facility, and scaled hydraulic model. 6/26/2002 5 Provides for a cost-of-living increase of 2.7%for 2002 per the original $ 557,697 $35,890,804 agreement. Pending 6 Provides engineering services for 9 changes including alternative alignment $(2 945,100) $32,945,704 studies, process control system pre-selection,and reassignment of system integrator. *The full amount of the PSA is reported. OCSD and OCWD will cost share this amount equally. GAntglobaNAgenda Draft ReportWolnl 8wrdsMWrn GWR.ahach 3.add6.CDM.dac 09/04/02 ReAwd 05/14W BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROPOSED TOTAL PROJECTRASN AUTHORIZED D PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION E%TOD TORE O DATE(% BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DALE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(X) Project Development $ 700000 $ 4,00D $ 4000 $ 4000 $ 4WD $ 4,000 100% SmdiegPormiting- 3,313.000 S 3.313.000 $ 3.300.000 $ 3,300,000 S 3.313.00(1 100% Confidant Pw S T,500000 S 18,W1,849 $ 18.831,849 $ 16.158,334 $ I1.472,5W $ 16.685.754 $ Z60 .000 16% Design Staff s 2,349,000 $ 5,357,000 $ 5,357,000 $ 5,357,000 $ 5,357,000 s 1,400,000 28% Condrudion Contract" S 86.481.50D $ 157.200.000 S 15T,200,000 $ 9,642.655 S 9,642,655 $ 3,000.000 31% ConMruction Administalion'^ S 2.653,900 S 6.653.000 $ 6.653000 $ 5,496,519 $ Sisa 19 S 200.000 4% Construction Inspection 5 9.345.600 S 326.000 S 326.000 095 Contingem.T $ 12,895,000 S 9.721.151 S 9.721,151 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 121,925.000 S 201.208.000 S201,205,000 S 41.958.508 $ (1,422.550) S 40.485,955 S 10,517.M 26% Reimbursable Costs I S W.500.000 1 S 30.500000 11 1 1 S 2.112.500 PROJECT NET I $ 121,925.000 S 1)0.]06.000 1 a170.706,000 11 $ 41.958,500 $ (1,472,550) $ 40485950 1$ 6404,500 2t% Funds aumodzed to dale includes multiple contracts issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Protect Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System win the Orange County Water Distinct "Funds aNEonued to data include Pipeline at Theo Lary Jail SCE subsletion construction.temporary office facilities,agreement and easements,production of MFW vendor design dCWments,and Owner Controlled Insurance Program. "'Funds au horn ed to data include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27.2002 G trd910balNgende Draft RepirlsVoinl Boards\Illem attach 1 GWR.soda.cent xisluv 02-03 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mwn•y Date I To ea.of Dir. osnsro: AGENDA REPORT rem Number Item Numbu ts(d)rm Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an Orange County Water District issued Task Order to Westin Engineering, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $310,000 for implementation planning for the Integrated Information System for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District sharing equal costs of$155,000. SUMMARY • The Integrated Information System (IIS)will allow Orange County Water District (OCWD)to provide for long-term sustainability and cost-effective Operations & Maintenance of the Groundwater Replenishment(GWR) System. • The IIS will provide OCWD with a systematic process of operating, maintaining, and upgrading physical assets cost-effectively. • The IIS will be developed in a five-stage process: planning, design, acquisition, installation and operation. The planning stage Is a $310,000 element of$6,600,000 in total engineering services, software acquisition, and integration costs for the IIS. • A key Integration component for the IIS is with the Financial Information System (FIS). Westin is currently developing the new FIS for OCWD. Westin also provided peer review of Camp Dresser and McKee, Ines. work on developing the IIS program and developed the preliminary work on implementation planning for the IIS. • Brown and Caldwell is on the GWR System final design team and provided expertise in the area of asset management for the project. Brown and Caldwell has also performed rehabilitation and replacement planning for OCWD's existing facilities. • Staff recommends entering into a Sole Source agreement with Westin as the lead consultant and Brown and Caldwell as a suboonsultant for the planning work for the IIS for a total not to exceed $310,000. • The remainder of the IIS work for the GWR System has an estimated value of $6,290,000, and will be competitively solicited. Rn ; vnmi Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRAC T COST SUMMARY Authorization of$155,000 for Consultant's Professional Service Agreement is being requested for Orange County Sanitation District's(OCSD) 50% share of the proposed $310,000 Task Order, as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2002-03 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 157) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the September 16, 2002, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES Because the Orange County Water District(OCWD) is issuing a new Task Order, competitive proposals could have been solicited. Staff requests to instead reorganize the existing consultants and issue a task order. There would have been additional time and expense to solicit proposals and bring a new consultant on-board for the planning effort for the Integrated Information System (IIS)plan. The existing team members will not have to work through a leaming curve that would cause a time delay and added expense. CEOA FINDINGS The OCSD and OCWD Board of Directors certified the Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001; Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002 and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table _2. September 16, 2002, JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Integrated Information System —Task Order to Westin Engineering, Inc. WTS:jo WeatlWatat+ntgbbarAgenda Draft RepansVolnt BoardsUtem.GWR."sOn and IIS.dae e�wo, Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIP"k, C Is .10 - Kb V,160L I U IslibJ N Mpg 1 iWtl D Project Dewslo,nnent $ 4,000 $ 4.00D $ 4,000 $ 4.000 $ 4,000 100% StudlertfluermIRW 3,313,00 $ 3,313.000 S 3,300.000 $ 3.300,ODD S 3.313,000 100% Consultant PW $ 7.600,000 $ 18.631.849 $ 18.631849 $ 16.685.784 S 155,000 $ 16,840.784 $ 2.600,000 15% Design Suit $ 2.M9.000I$ 5.M7.M $M5.357.000 $ 5.W7.000 $75.357.000 $ 1.400.000 26% C;onsbucdon Contrast'• 5 86.481.500 1$ 1572W.000 $157.200.000 111 9,642,665 $ 9,642,655 $ 3,000.000 31% Construction Adminisinardon— $ 2.651900 $ 8.60.0110 $ 6,653,004) $ 5.496.519 $ 5.486.519 $ 200,000 4% Construction In $ 9,395,BDD $ 325,000 $ 326.000 0% Condn n $ 12,695.OW S 9721151 $ 9.721,151 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 121,925.000 $ 201.206,000 $201,206,000 i,: $ 40,486,958 S 155.000 $ 40.640.968 $ 10.517.000 26% lReimbursable Coadal IS 30.500.000 1 $ 30,500,000 11 $ 2,112.500 1 1PROJECT NET 1 $ 121.925.000 1 S 170.706.000 $170,706.000 $ 40,485,958 If 155,1300 $ 40.640,95B $ 8.04.500 21% *Funds authorized to date Includes mulgple con1cw1l;issued under the same,of the Cooperall"Allurement for Proed Planning for fire Groundwater ReVentshment System with the Change County Water District "Fume authorized W date Include P4)etlne at Theo Lacy Jail,SCE substation construction,temporary offica facillffles,agreement and easements,production of MFIUV vendor design documents.and Owner Gonft0!Iad Insurance Program. ...Funds authorized to data Include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27.2002 G-Amilloballiegenda Draft Reporstloint Boardsqfteun aftaCh 1.GWR.wes1mXISjwsSIIn Agenda Item #3 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: September 16, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To:. Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $290,000 From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Bill Everest, Laura Thomas Subject: INTEGRATED INFORMATION SYSTEM -TASK ORDER to WESTIN ENGINEERING, INC. SUMMARY The development plan for the Integrated Information System (IIS) includes five major stages: planning, design, acquisition, installation and operation. A detailed scope of work for the planning stage is attached. The cost for the planning stage will be $290,000 and the work will be completed in 3 '/2 months. The planning stage is an element of the $6,600,000 program for engineering, software acquisition, and integration for the IIS. Staff has elected to modify the consultant teams to take advantage of the technical expertise of Westin Engineering and Brown and Caldwell in developing software based systems. Westin has completed the overview planning documents for the IIS, and has also completed the preliminary design for the OCW D Financial Information System (FIS), which will facilitate seamless integration of all components. Brown and Caldwell developed the asset management plan during the early stages of the design. Brown and Caldwell also developed the replacement and refurbishment plan for the existing facilities at OCWD. Reorganization of the teams to place Westin in the lead role requires a separate task order. This work, valued at$290,000, is a sole-source solicitation of professional services. The remaining program, valued at$6,310,000 will be competitively solicited. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of a Task Order to Westin Engineering for Task 25, Preliminary ' Design and Implementation Planning for the Information Management System in an amount not to exceed $290,000. Agendize for September 18 OCW D Board Meeting and for September 25 OCSD Board Meeting. - 1 - Agenda Item #3 DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS The GWR System will more than double the value of the assets that OCWD currently manages and maintains. The construction of the GWR System will significantly increase the value, number, and complexity of the assets that OCWD is responsible for. The IIS will allow OCWD to provide for long-term sustainability and cost effective stewardship of the GWR System. The development of the IIS for the GWR System will provide OCWD with a decision-making framework, business processes, and information management technology necessary to support the long-term sustainability of the GWR System. A key feature of this program is that it defines explicit, clearly stated plans and objectives for these systems. These objectives reflect expectations, as well as considerations unique to the GWR System facilities and infrastructure and will also serve as a framework for the rest of OCWD's assets. The program will provide OCWD with a systematic process of maintaining, upgrading, and operating physical assets cost- effectively. It combines engineering principles with sound business practices and economic analyses, and it provides tools to facilitate a more organized, logical approach to decision-making. Figure 1 shows the diagram of the refined Integrated Information System presented to the Joint Cooperative Committee in January. The three key systems in the development of the IIS are the Process Control System (PCS), the Financial Information System (FIS) and the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). The PCS Supplier is currently in the process of being pre-selected. Once selected the PCS data management requirements will be determined and that information made available to the IIS development team. The FIS is also currently being pre-selected and the data management information needs of the FIS will be considered in the development of the IIS. The CMMS will be selected and installed as part of the IIS implementation plan. Figure 1: System Diagram of the Integrated Information System Mapping • • ' " ManagementLaboratory Information Proce_sssssss�l System Control System Lz!� Water Resource Information Smart P&IDsManagement System Agenda Item #3 The Integrated Information System Development Plan The development plan for the Integrated Information System (IIS) includes five major stages. The five stages are summarized in Figure 2. The development approach for the IIS is designed to ensure that each of the basic elements are fully implemented by the time the GWR System is placed into operation. Figure 2 GWR System IIS Development Concept • Define Define GWR Issue GWR Acquire and Operate GWR Objectives System Asset System Its RFP Install Hardware System • Start Business and Evaluate and Software Asses Vendor Process Maintenance Candidate GWR Prepare Asset Support Definition Management System IIS Management Evaluation Complete Business Components Plan Business Conceptual Processes Select GWR Implement Processes Design Derive Initial System IIS Asset and Evaluate GWR Define Benefits Asset Supplier)Vendor Maintenance System IIS and C and Cost Management Enter Into Management Operation • Complete Plan Contract to Business Udate Asset System Define GWR Provide GWR Processes Management Plannin Ys System Its s tem Its. Train OCWD Plan g • Define GWR Requirements Staff Plan Needed DevelopGWR GWR System Its System[isto Acquire and System RFP and Architecture Selection Test Data Enhancements • Develop Criteria Test y Accept Acquisition GWR System Plan GWR System Contract with Operating GWR System IIS Scope Its Design System Its Its Acquisition GWR System Vendor(s) Plan IIS RFP The Budget The following table shows the anticipated budget for the entire IIS development plan. The planning stage is a $290,000 element of the $6,600,000 program for engineering, software acquisition, and integration for the IIS. Engineering Software Integration Total Task25 Planning $290,000 $290,000 Task26 Design $1.450,000 $1,450.000 Task27 Acquisition $300,000 $1,200,000 $250,000 $1,750,000 Task26 Installation $150,000 $2,600,000 $2,750,000 Task 29 Operation $110,000 $250,000 $360,000 Total $2,300,000 $1 200 000 $3 100 000 $6 600 000 - 3 - Agenda Item #3 , The following table shows the cost breakdown for Task 25. Task No Task Title Westin B & C Total Task 25.1 Complete Project Initiation $15,148 $6,000 $21,148 - Task 25.2 Information Discovery and Review $37-,368 $18,000 $55,368 Task 25.3 Define Asset and Maintenance Management Ob'ecti s W7,520 $32 000 $79,520 Task 25.4 Develop Asset and Maintenance Business Practices $45925 $11000 $56,925 Task 25.5 Develop GWR System IIS Integration - Plan $20,433 $5 000 $25,433 Task 25.6 Develop Conceptual GWR System IIS Architecture $12 000 1 $5 000 $17.000 Task 25.7 Prepare Initial System Acquisition Plan 1 $16,6081 $5 000 $21,608 Task 25.8 Maintain the Risk Management Pro ram 1 $8 998 $4 000 $12,998 Total 1 $204 000 1 $86 000 $290.000 The Team Staff has elected to modify the role the consultant teams to take advantage of the technical expertise of Westin Engineering and Brown and Caldwell in developing software based systems. During the early development of the IIS Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. (CDM) was the lead engineer with Brown and Caldwell providing support in the asset management plan and financial systems while Westin Engineering acted in the role of peer review. The team has been restructured to have Westin Engineering in the lead role for development of the IIS. Brown and Caldwell will continue to support the IIS in the area of asset management as a sub-consultant to Westin Engineering. CDM will continue as lead designer of the PCS and will support the development of the IIS in the development of the PCS data management issues. Westin has completed the overview planning documents for the IIS, and has also completed the preliminary design for the OCWD Financial Information System (FIS), which will facilitate seamless integration of all components. Brown and Caldwell developed the asset management plan during the early stages of the design. Brown and Caldwell also developed the replacement and refurbishment plan for the existing facilities at OCW D. The Schedule Task 25 is anticipated to require a total of 3-% months for completion. This schedule will enable key information required in the AWTF contract documents such as data management requirements, asset tag information, and data flow requirements to be obtained. Figure 3 shows the completion schedule. -4 - Y Agenda Item #3 Figure 3: Task 26 Schedule T' '� '',y x Ir��Il ,j'�a 4ut3mz Movzm �cap2 .wmw � 4 /4"as{ I' Sfarf fiNM Owae'm fj ..a e-12}. t� {,. 1 �f0'11 f02 i VI1 f 1b11b8 Mf f fq SrJr1E.". e.r^e � :Y Taek25.1 CAnpIMSV.Jfu S p 10/12M tort 2 Sa ATpk 21nbTfetbnel600 aW 1N6(lOp2 10/ i1 100 Ra . Teak 25.30oflne Neaelrvtl MOiMenorva��. 10R211g0] 11/4/Xp2 1W �;:F OCpGivmiv 0(2ND Ta 25.4eevebp Nee .Wi M1tainteneMa lMnepBapM Buvrwas 11/512W2 12fd2002 20s Rxm%e ' Ta 25.5 Gevtlop Vie GM System His 1115r= 12/162002 300 Integre Plan Taek 25.60evabp Go,Oapl WGWR 1v1712002 12y302002 1W y 5yatam System11sA ftWro Task 25.7 Prepare SYSMM A Isieen 121siMM2 11I=N3 loll _ 01 T�reMO Stelnmin Via NM Manapemant 1owm 1/130003 7W PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS On January 28, 2002 the JCC approved the plan presented by staff for the refined Integrated Information System. On January 14, 2002 the JCC directed staff to prepare a presentation detailing the reduced Integrated Information System. On December 10, 2001 the JCC directed staff to develop a plan to minimize the scope of the transactional system to focus on the direct needs of the GW R System. On August 13, 2001 the JCC approved a $47,500 task order for Westin Engineering, Inc. to provide Peer Review of the consultant team for the transactional system. On June 10, 2001 t he J CC a pproved a p urchase o rder i n a n amount not to exceed $95,000 to purchase the REBIS AutoPLANT Smart P&ID software. - 5 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To M.of Mi 09/25/02 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Rem Number 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: PERMANENT SHORT-TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION PROJECT, JOB NO. J-87 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file Addendum No. 7 to the Certified 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report prepared by Environmental Science Associates for the Permanent Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, and (2)Authorize Staff to proceed with the Permanent Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, as required by Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R8 2002-0055. SUMMARY • Since adoption of the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR), a new project has been mandated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board that will need subsequent documentation according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This project is the Permanent Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87. • The Strategic Plan PEIR included provisions for emergency bleach addition to the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) effluent. However, the PEIR did not describe facilities for continuous operation and dechlorination of treated effluent wastewater prior to discharge through the 120-inch outfall. Temporary short-tern bacteria reduction facilities were installed as described in Addendum No. 6 to the PEIR. The proposed facilities described in Addendum No. 7 would replace these temporary facilities with more permanent facilities for the next three to five years. • Pursuant to CEQA, an addendum is the appropriate document to describe the modifications under the proposed project. According to CEQA, no public circulation or review period is required for an addendum prepared for a previously circulated and Certified Final Environmental Impact Report. The District's 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR was previously circulated for a 45-day public review period; June 29, 1999 through August 16, 1999. G:rq pV N9mEaBW'E AgmN R¢p[M1 2 R¢pxLL`990Nl-1.} lEp[ R."ue. •,tea Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No expenditure is being requested at this time. Expenditures that have not yet been approved will be brought to the Board of Directors for approval or ratification separately. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 91) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No budgetary action is being requested at this time. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION To address the project described herein, Environmental Science Associates (ESA) has prepared an addendum to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Addendum No. 7 for Permanent Short-Tenn Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, has been prepared. The addendum has been prepared to address minor modifications to the original disinfection facilities described in the PEIR. Although bacteria reduction of the treated wastewater is discussed in 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report, the Permanent Short-Tenn Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, was not specifically addressed. However, the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) existing bleach station facility, located at Plant No. 2, was designed to add bleach to treated wastewater discharged to the District's emergency 78-inch (1 mile) ouffall and the Santa Ana River emergency overflow. The disinfection plan as described in the PEIR will be modified to replace temporary short-term disinfection/dechlorination facilities at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, located in the cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach, respectively. The temporary short-term disinfection facilities were necessary to respond to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. R8-2002-0055, mandating the District to employ and implement disinfection/dechlorination facilities by August 12, 2002. The proposed project replaces these temporary facilities with permanent facilities designed to operate for three to five years until a long term system is constructed. On July 19, 2002, the RWQCB amended the District's 1998 Ocean Discharge Permit to mandate bacteria reduction effective August 12, 2002. Staff is proposing to replace the temporary facilities to disinfect the Districts treated wastewater with sodium hypochlorlte (chlorine bleach) and dechlorinate the effluent with sodium bisulfite (chlorine removal process). G M UIa�AO B dPpbxlaA +090Nian to N)Ooc ..ed: .10. Page 2 A more permanent (3-5 years) short-term facility has been designed and is scheduled to be advertised for public bids in October 2002. The temporary short- term facilities will be removed as necessary as construction and implementation of future permanent short-term facilities are developed. It is anticipated that the bacteria reduction will be conducted in three phases. The temporary short-term facilities were implemented in August 2002. Phases two and three are planned to include: • Phase 2- Permanent short-term facilities providing full-time service for a three to five-year period or until a long-term alternative is developed, designed and installed. The permanent short-term facilities may be retained as back-up facilities after the long-term facilities are installed. • Phase 3- Long-term (2007-2020)facilities will be developed and designed based on the Strategic Plan Update. Technologies such as ultraviolet (UV) light disinfection are being studied for implementation in the next three to five years. The modifications to the proposed Permanent Short Term Facilities (Phase 2) do not require adoption of additional mitigation measures that were not already included within the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR), nor does it change the conclusion of the PEIR regarding the significance of environmental impacts. ALTERNATIVES No alternative. The Orange County Sanitation District is required to implement the Short-Tenn Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project by order of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. CEQA FINDINGS An addendum is the appropriate document to describe the modifications under the proposed project, because none of the conditions described in 14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15162 and 15163, calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or Supplemental EIR, have occurred. (14 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 115164.) ATTACHMENTS N/A JDH:AA:sa WntglobaMgenda Daft Repo \Joint BoardsU-07 A 092502.dw c.w.cuaa�eoma nymea ne,vszow m.b npa+m wmeu�ien+sie�e� �„x,. •,� Page 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To 50.of Dir. oerzsioz • AGENDA REPORT Item Nume Item Number v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: Urgency Ordinance No. OCSD-19, Amending Table H of Ordinance No. OCSD-18 re Wastehauler Charges for Use GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-19, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Amending Table H of Ordinance No. OCSD-18 re Wastehauler Charges for Use a. Verbal report of General Counsel b. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-19 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) C. Motion to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-19 as an urgency measure, to be effective immediately. SUMMARY Please refer to General Counsel's memorandum (attached)dated September 6, 2002. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS General Counsel's Memorandum dated 9/6/02 Proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-19 GM9 aIOLLplMeNOMd Ap nePn Q=B rd AWW FZWItYF M1)QO 19 dM �. .1. Page 1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION _ MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: September 6, 2002 RE: Urgency Ordinance Amending Table H of Ordinance No. OCSD-18 re Wastehauler Charges for Use Before your Board for action at this time is an Urgency Ordinance authorizing an amendment to Table H of recently-adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-18 which establishes the District's comprehensive fees and charges for use. A clerical error has been discovered relating to the fees charged to Wastehaulers for waste originating outside Orange County. Reflected in Ordinance No. OCSD-18 is $0.035 per gallon of truck capacity, when the established amount, per previously- enacted Ordinance No. OCSD-06 (and which has never been reduced by the Board), is $0.11 per gallon of truck capacity. It is recommended that this Ordinance be adopted. o YY� l HOMAS L. OODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW pj cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed Mr. R.P. Ghirelli Ms. M. Talebi Ms. P. Kyle N15716MI ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING TABLE H OF ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-18 RE WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District does hereby find: A. The Board of Directors has previously established, by duly adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-18, Table H, charges for use by Wastehaulers, as authorized by Sections 306.3 and 306.7 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations, adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. B. That the intent of Ordinance No. OCSD-18, Table H, was to continue in effect the rates established by Ordinance No. OCSD-06. C. By inadvertent error, the rate of charges for out-of-County Wastehaulers was incorrectly stated in Table H, notwithstanding written and verbal reports to the Board of Directors to continue the same rates as set forth in Ordinance No. OCSD-06. D. That the charges for use adopted by this Ordinance, revise the rates for Wastehaulers for waste originating outside of Orange County, to comply with the intent of the Board of Directors when adopting Ordinance No. OCSD-18. E. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment, pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8), and the California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Table H of Ordinance No. OCSD-18 is hereby amended, as follows: 1 E "TABLE H WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE Wastehauler Fees Charges Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.035/gallon of within Orange County truck capacity Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.11/gallon of outside Orange County truck capacity' Section 2: This Ordinance is enacted as an Urgency Ordinance, to allow for the continued processing of charges for use, in order to fulfill the on- going obligations of the District in accordance with the provisions of the District's Ordinances currently in effect. Section 3: This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. Section 4: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than two- thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a meeting held September 25, 2002. Chair, Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel 2 Addendum No. 7 PERMANENT SHORT-TERM DISINFECTION FACILITIES PROJECT, JOB NO. J-87 Orange County Sanitation District 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report September 2002 1 R'i6Avc buaol 'ard ]_i Bush Sven IUUO brwdxas ]W b'mmrnc:4enoc 'W Ulmcnon RJ. �/�� EmbonmenRd vv+SO S.-I'M So�a+10 Snc IN =10_ `\/ k'•^°• Los AZI, Sao Fond,. (' Aland. Sacnmrnm. Clc 'r . Califomia CaLfomia Ca0lbmia Ulbfo Flonda 4f,010351 WIW 9'I 9"Q 3}i62 U231433`111 P4F)8%-$WO 151111 939AI66 Ia IRl i61 %0 1�17,572-i26 OCSD PERMANENT SHORT-TERM DISINFECTION FACILITIES PROJECT ADDENDUM NO. 7 - 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM EIR 1.0 INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW OF PROPOSED PROJECT The Orange County Sanitation District (District or OCSD) has been developing plans to add a disinfection step to its wastewater treatment process. Implementation of the disinfection process is scheduled for completion in three different phases: 1) temporary short-term facilities, 2) permanent short-term facilities, and 3) permanent long-tens facilities. The District recently completed Addendum No. 6 to its 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR (PEIR), which addresses the temporary short-term disinfection facilities that became operational in mid-August 2002. This Addendum No. 7 addresses the permanent short-term disinfection facilities. The District anticipates that construction of these facilities will begin at the end of 2002 and will take 3-5 months with an anticipated startup date in February 2003. The District is currently completing studies necessary to develop permanent disinfection facilities to be used in the long-term. In the midst of the District's planning to implement a disinfection project, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region 8 (Regional Board or RWQCB), and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (EPA), amended the District's waste discharge requirements and NPDES permit (Order No. 98-5) to require compliance with bacterial objectives throughout the water column in waters within three miles offshore. Order No. 98-5 and Region 8 Basin Plan previously required compliance with bacterial objectives only in the top ten feet of the water column in ocean waters within three miles offshore. On July 19, 2002, the Regional Board adopted the modified Order/NPDES permit (Order No. R8-2002-0055 Amending Order No. 98-5, NPDES No. CA0110604), which added water quality-based effluent limits for total residual chlorine, and revised the effluent limits for acute toxicity and acute toxicity test species in accordance with the . 2001 update to the California Ocean Plan. The new Order went into effect on August 12,2002. Compliance with the revised bacterial objectives in Order No. RS-2002-0055 necessitated disinfection of the effluent discharge in less than one-month. Thus, in order to implement disinfection immediately, the District installed temporary facilities that were ready for use by early August 2002. The temporary disinfection facilities will operate for six to nine months until OCSD constructs the permanent short-term facilities,as described in this Addendum. Once constructed,these facilities will operate for approximately three to five years. Ultimately, the District will implement and operate Me AtlE .No.r 1 09/16/02 mmn tS n Tura Msinfmion P*J FSA IM.1". long-term disinfection facilities, however planning,review,design and construction of these long-term facilities are expected to take up to 5 years to complete. .The temporary disinfection facilities project made use of some of the existing facilities at the District's two treatment plants and also required construction of some additional storage tanks, pipelines, pump stations and related facilities, all within the existing plant sites. The permanent short-term disinfection facilities will likewise use some of the existing facilities,but will also require installation of additional_ storage tanks, pipelines, and pumps,and the removal of some of the temporary facilities. Section 2.0 describes the proposed project facilities and operations. Section 3.0 describes the purpose and need. for the addition of disinfection to the OCSD wastewater treatment system process. CEQA REVIEW CEQA provides that a lead agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines §I5162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. (14.Cal. Code Regs §15164(a)). The conditions described in Section 15162 are as follows: 1) substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the environment of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2) substantial changes occur with respect to circumstances under which the project is undertaken which require major revisions to the previous EIR; or 3) new information of substantial importance becomes available that was not known and could not have been known through the exercise of reasonable diligence when prior project was approved(14 Cal.Code Regs. §15162). If any of these conditions are present, a lead agency must prepare a subsequent EIR or a supplement to the EIR. An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included or attached to the Final EIR. The OCSD Board shall consider the Addendum with the Final PEIR prior to making a decision on the project. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR should be included in the Addendum and must be supported by substantial evidence. The PEIR addressed the District's long-term, phased program of sewer system improvement and expansion through the year 2020, including treatment system upgrades and new facilities at both OCSD's Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No. 2. The program includes several actions over 20 years to rehabilitate, upgrade, and expand facilities throughout the collection and treatment system. The Strategic Plan indicated that the District would study the need and best approach for disinfection and implement a program as needed, but it did not identify specific facilities for evaluation in the PEIR(PEIR,pages 3-37,6.9-4,and 9-11). As substantiated in this Addendum, the proposed construction of new tanks, pumps, and pipelines at the two OCSD treatment plant sites for the permanent short-term disinfection facilities do not require major revisions to the PEIR which would mandate preparation of a Subsequent EIR or Supplement to the PEIR. This Addendum describes the project modifications and concludes that these modifications do not result in new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant effects, nor has there been a substantial change in circumstances or the disclosure of new OCSD AddeMum No.7 2 0011"2 Pmnenem Shan Temp Munreaion Project ESA/201.168. information of substantial importance since the District approved the Strategic Plan. The proposed modifications to the District's treatment system would not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. - The PEIR was prepared and adopted prior to beach closures in Huntington Beach that have occurred periodically since that time. In response, numerous water quality studies have been conducted to evaluate the causative factors. To date, there have been no definitive conclusions implicating the OCSD wastewater discharge as being responsible for the beach closures. However, to assure that the District's discharge is not contributing to the beach closures, the District proposed to implement preventative measures via effluent disinfection, which is now required by the new NPDES permit requirements. Construction of the permanent short-term disinfection facilities would not require adoption of additional construction-related mitigation measures beyond those that have already been adopted by the District. Further, the operation of the disinfection facilities would be conducted in compliance with the revised NPDES permit issued by the RWQCB and thus be consistent with water quality regulations implemented to mitigate the potential for significant water quality and public health impacts. 2.0 PROPOSED PROJECT This CEQA EIR Addendum (No. 7) addresses construction and operation of permanent short-term disinfection facilities at OCSD's two wastewater treatment facilities— Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No.2. The facilities are scheduled for start-up in early 2003 and will operate for three to five years, at which time the permanent long-term disinfection program will then be implemented. Section 4.0 provides an overview of the existing OCSD treatment facilities and operation. The permanent short-teml disinfection facilities will operate in the same manner as the temporary facilities. Wastewater will be dosed with a 12.5 percent solution of sodium hypochlorite (chlorine bleach) to achieve the required bacteria reduction. Then, to reduce the residual concentration of chlorine in the effluent before ocean discharge, the effluent will also undergo dechlorination using sodium bisulfate. The proposed permanent facilities and operations are described below. Existing facilities at both plants will be used to the extent feasible. Existing facilities will be supplemented with new equipment, piping and appurtenances as necessary to provide a fully controlled system. Table 1 summarizes the proposed facilities at each plant site. PLANT NO. I Figure 1 shows proposed permanent,short-term disinfection facility locations at Plant No. 1. Bleach Facilities A new bleach facility at Plant No. I would be required beyond those currently used for the temporary facilities. This facility would be located adjacent to and east of the existing bleach station just south of the trickling filter clarifier, near the southeasterly plant boundary. Two to three new storage tanks oaD Aad .Wo 7 3 osnam R,mmm/anon T.M.a..Pmjtt/ ESA/WI-la. would be constructed along with secondary containment. The total storage area would be about 60 feet by 25 feet or 1500 square feet. OCSD Addendum No.r 4 "116N2 Pamanem Shon Teem Disinkmian Pmjen ESA I201-168. TABLE 1: Summary of Proposed Components for the Permanent Short-Term - Bacteria Reduction Facilities project No. 2 Plant No.2 Plant Component No. I Strategy I—Primary Strategy 2—Primary Influent Effluent Bleach Facility Construct all new facilities. Use existing emergency bleach facility. Bleach: Construct 2-3 Bleach: Use 6 existing 12,500-galhm tanks with secondary 18 600 gallon ranks with spill containment in place.Existing tank sin is approximately Stooge Tanks secondary spill 15 ft.high x 12-ft.dia. containment. Tanks to be Sodom Bisulfite: Construct 34 new 19,500-gallon tanks 24 ft high x 12 ft dia. with secondary spill containment.Tanks to be 18 ft high x 12 ft dia. Bleach: 75,000 gallons Bleach: 75,000 gallons Total Storage Bleach: Max cap:55,800 6-7 days 34 days Capacity and gal Sodium Bisulfite: Maximum Sodium Bisulfite:Maximum Days of Stooge 12-14 days capacity:78,000 gallons capacity: 79,000 gallons IS-16 days 7-8 days Bleach: Install 6-8 new Bleach:Replace existing positive displacement pumps with Pumps ImmPs new peristaltic tube pumps. Sodium Bisulfite: Install 6-8 new pumps Bleach: Install 1500 feet of 1 Yrin.pipe(about Bleach: 4,190 feet of I h-in.pipe(about 3,600 feet in tunnels 1,200 feet CPVC and up to 500 feet above ground) aboveground and in Carrier water. 700 feet of 2'h-in.(580 feet in tunnels, 120 Pipelines tunnels and up to 300 feet feel above ground) buried) Sodium Bisulfite: 1,040 feet of I 'S-in.pipe(about 900-900 Carrier water: Install 175 feet above ground and 100-200 feet buried) feet of 2%-in.CPVC (buried) 10 mglL(8-15 mg/L) 25 mg/L(20-30 mg/L) Bleach dosing 6 ell(5-8 mg/L) 7.300 gpd primaries 18,300 Slid primaries and usage 4,200 cad 4,200 gpd secondary 4,200 gpd secondary 11.500 gpd total 22,500 gpd total Trucks per day 1-2 rocks 54 (bleach) 2-3 Sodium Bisulfite dosing None 6 mf4, 00 S ill 12 mg/L 00-15gpd mg/l.) end usage 4,900 Slid 9,600 Slid Trucks per day (Sodium None 1-2 2-3 Bisulfite) • oCSD AM.&.No 5 mnber Pmmnmt Shm Tmn Disinfmion Rolm, ESA/"W W. PERMANENT SHORT-TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION FACILITIES AT PLANT 1 3{ i Qgryp j1 I �af�RoaQ .q0 BIEACII FEEOLINE (MJELRONI Pomm { �I � , f` O BLERCX FPCM1ffY _ � I ++•t\ 1 : . t SIEILII PPINO wmt on Pomm BEGOXDIIRY (" / r� ShITiER BOX RESIOUPLCMMM !9 I '- • �� B SPNPIWG PdM t 1�NG Lu t Z � I ly I ` I FE FIFEDMI E XTBIEO.CNl !,. 1 1 _ ISTING TPR1AT liY I t I _ EFFFLUFLUE ENT _ .-_.. 1 ;: i I ORIRRUTION BO% I ' t 1 WESTPERIMITER-ROAD \ FIGURE 1 '. REV15E0 SEPiEMSER I;d00] These tanks would be approximately 24 feet high by 12 feet in diameter and have a capacity of about 18,600 gallons each. Total maximum storage capacity for bleach would be 55,800 gallons, which would provide 12 to 14 days of storage. Bleach would be applied at two points: the Primary Effluent Distribution Box (PEDB) and the Secondary Effluent Splitter Box (SESB). New bleach chemical feed pumps would be installed to convey chemical from the tanks to the feed points. It is anticipated that six to eight pumps would be - required for normal operation and standby duty. Diffusers would be used to mix chemical into the effluent flow stream. Approximately 1,500 feet of 1-1/2 inch pipe (about 1,200 feet of CPVC above ground and in tunnels and up to 300 feet buried)would be installed to connect the bleach facility to the dosing points. Approximately 175 feet of buried 2-1/2 inch CPVC pipe would be installed to distribute carrier water. The temporary bleach facility will be eliminated once the permanent facility has been installed. All equipment will be removed from the original bleach station, and the tanks and temporary equipment will be removed. All temporary facilities will be demolished in preparation for new construction of the trickling filters that is planned for Spring 2003. Construction of the new trickling filters was addressed by the PEIR and approved by the District as pan of the near-term projects to be implemented under the adopted Strategic Plan. Operations Dosing at the PEDB would be are rate of approximately 8-10milligrams per liter(mg/I)and 2.5 me at the SESB. Bleach addition would be adjusted according to existing plant influent meters and optimized based on chlorine residual measured by automated chlorine analyzers. The primary analyzer would be located south of Plant No. 1 at the effluent junction box, adjacent to Garfield Avenue. A second chlorine analyzer for monitoring Plant No. I effluent would be located at Plant No. 2 at the 120-inch pipeline outlet to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS). During the initial stages of operation, District staff will also manually sample and monitor chlorine residual in order to compare the chlorine analyzer readings and confirm proper operation of the automated analyzers. Based on the dose rate and average Plant flows, typical bleach usage is expected to be approximately 4,200 gallons per day(gpd)or 1,533,000 gallons per year. The sodium hypochlorite solution would be delivered daily in one to two truck trips per day. Delivery trucks would enter and exit at the main plant entrance on Ellis Avenue. . Deliveries are normally scheduled during the regular shift (7:00 am to 5:00 pm) for safety reasons during unloading. The District staff currently uses bleach. Training and safety procedures for delivery and unloading of the tracks will be based on the current bleach application protocols established at the Plants. Because of the expected increase in the number of deliveries,additional staff training will be performed. A refresher training session of approximately 6 hours will be provided to about 60 staff. On-site spill prevention,containment,and clean up,as well as health and safety issues, will be pan of the training. Off-site spills will be handled by the chemical vendor and/or transport company,as under current chemical transport protocols. D SD Addendum No 7 00116112 P oan<m Shin Tn Dwnfemioo Prajeel ESA 1201.166. PLANT NO. 2 Figures 2 and 3 show the proposed facilities locations at Plant No. 2 under two different treatment strategies described below. Bleach Facilities Existing facilities would be used at Plant No. 2. The existing Plant 2 bleach station was constructed to - disinfect the emergency release of effluent to the Santa Ana River. This facility is located in the southeast portion of Plant No.2,approximately 150 feet west of the easterly property boundary near A and B digesters. There are existing bleach tanks, pumps, and piping at this site. These existing facilities would be upgraded with new pumps,piping,and appurtenances for the permanent short-term facility. The existing positive displacement pumps would be replaced with new peristaltic tube pumps to dispense the bleach from the tanks to the feed points. There are six existing 12,500-gallon storage tanks providing a total storage capacity of 75,000 gallons. These tanks are 12.5 feet high and 14 feet in diameter. Secondary spill containment for the tanks is already in place. These tanks are currently in use for the temporary disinfection facility and no new tanks would be constructed. The temporary pumps will be upgraded and the temporary control equipment and piping now in use will be removed and replaced with permanent facilities. There are two alternative treatment strategies being considered for Plant No. 2. Under Strategy I bleach would be added to the primary influent and under Strategy 2 bleach would be added to the primary effluent. The benefit of adding bleach to the primary influent is that it provides a longer contact time for the chlorine and the wastewater bacteria, and, therefore, less bleach needs to be applied. However, laboratory testing is continuing on this strategy to determine if there are any adverse impacts to the treatment process by adding bleach at this point. In addition, bleach would also be added to the secondary effluent under either strategy. A facility layout plan for piping has been developed for each of the two treatment strategies. Figure 2 presents the proposed permanent short-term facilities for Strategy I—addition of bleach to the primary influent. Figure 3 presents the proposed permanent short-term facilities for Strategy 2—addition of bleach to the primary effluent. Table 1,above,summarizes the facilities required under each strategy. Pipelines for Primary Influent Bleach Addition (Strategy 1) Approximately 4,190 feet of 1-1/2 inch pipeline would be installed to deliver bleach to the feed points at the grit chamber effluent flow splitter boxes B and C. Of this, approximately 3,600 feet would be installed within existing tunnels and about 500-600 feet of pipe would be laid above ground along the southeastern fence line of the plant to deliver bleach to the secondary effluent at the Activated Sludge (AS)treatment unit. Approximately 700 feet of 2-1/2 inch piping(580 feet in tunnels, 120 feet above ground)would be installed to distribute carrier water. OCSD A66 N..7 8 W11693 P ..Shm Tam,Died m,Project F IMI.166. SODWMSISULFITE UECHLORIMTION FEED PONT PERMANENT SHORT-TERM OCEAN OUTFALL SODIUM BISULFITE FKA BACTERIA REDUCTION Sq (PRE) PRIMARY INFLUENT OPTION L , , 1 NrgANAjtV AT PLANT 2 . . ._,. 9fANNEtFAMM .-. fn.ItINP1 - �9 EWSIING BLEACH, i PRE MUM I' .. BLEZ FEED `r POINT �11I'i BLEACH FEED POINT AT '.f ACTIVATED SLUDGE OO BLEACH FEED IINJECNONI POIBT SODIUM BISULFITE FEED UWECNON) e PO IM ' C7 EDOWN BISULFITE FACILNY f - - - - - - - BLENCH FEED LINE S _ SODIUM BISULFITE �. : . DECHLORINALON FEED LWE r . FIGURE ]-STMTEGYI REUSED SEPMMSER 12 MV -- - - PERMANENT SHORT-TERM OCEAN OUTFALL SODIUM BISULFITE OEOHLORRMT1011 FEED POINT BACTERIA REDUCTION sooluM elsmcRE FaaLm (POST) PRIMARY EFFLUENT OPTION sgpTq AT PLANT 2 qbq j � � -R�RCNgNryEG I ' _ 1L�ExI�TING LEACH FACILITY i,.•. FEED Fol I! BLEACH FEED POINT AT ACTIVATED SLUDGE '••.� OO BLEaCHFEEO(INlET )FOMT �\ Q SODIUM SISULFITEFEED(INJECTIM) POINT _ _ _ _ _ — BLEACH FEED LINE QSy`Rs _..._._ D1 NJ WUT r V N CFEO LPE SODIUM SISUIFITE FRCILT' FIGURES"SMMOY2 • `fl _ .. REVISED SEPTEMBER 12.M2 Pipelines for Primary Effluent Bleach Addition(Strategy 2) As with Strategy I, approximately 4,190 feet of pipeline would be installed. Up to 3,600 feet of pipe would be installed in existing tunnels to deliver bleach to the feed points at the grit chamber effluent -flow splitter boxes B and C. About 500 to 600 feet of pipeline would be installed above ground along the southeastern fence line of the plant to deliver bleach to the secondary effluent at the Activated Sludge (AS) treatment unit. An additional 700 feet (580 feet in existing tunnels, 120 feet above ground)would be installed to deliver carrier water. Dechlorination Facilities A new sodium bisulfate facility at Plant No. 2 would be constructed. The proposed location for the storage and feed facility will be just south of the OOBS. Three to four new 19,500-gallon tanks would be installed with secondary containment providing up to 78,000 gallons of total storage. These tanks would be approximately 18 feet high and 12 feet in diameter. Under Strategy 1,this would provide 15 to 16 days of chemical storage. Under Strategy 2, this would provide up to 7 to 8 days of chemical storage. New chemical feed pumps for sodium bisulfate would be constructed from the tanks to the injection points. It is anticipated that six to eight pumps would be required for normal operation and standby duty. Jet noules will provide mixing into the treated effluent flow system. Both strategies would require the installation of approximately 1,040 feet of 1-12 inch CPVC plastic pipe, miscellaneous valves and fittings,and appurtenances. Approximately 800 to 900 feet of this piping would be above ground and 100 to 200 feet would be buried. The injection point for the dechlorination would vary depending on the bleach strategy implemented. If Strategy 1 were implemented, sodium bisulfrte would be injected at the OOBS wet well. The operation of the OOBS pumps would provide mixing of the chemical and wastewater. Using this location would achieve longer contact time and more thorough mixing of the dechlorination chemical than with Strategy 2. Sodium bisulfite would be added just prior to Surge Tower No. 2 and possibly within the surge tower if Strategy 2 were implemented. Using this location would provide an additional one to two minutes of chlorine contact time. A computer program that has been developed to model mixing of the chemical and wastewater will determine the optimum injection point. The temporary bisulfrte facility at Plant 2 will be eliminated once the permanent short-term facility has been installed. All temporary pumps,tanks,piping,and control equipment would be removed. Operations Strategy I-Primary Influent Bleach Addition The initial bleach dose rate would be 10 mg/I with ranges from 8 to 15 mg/1, depending on water quality. Based on this dose and an average Plant No. 2 primary effluent flow of 91 mgd, typical bleach usage would be 7,300 gpd for the primaries. The anticipated dose rate for the AS Plant secondary effluent would be 8 mg/I with ranges from 5 to 10 mg/I. Based on average flows of 65 mild through the AS plant, typical bleach usage would be 4,200 gpd. Total bleach consumption for Plant OCSD Addendum No.7 11 WhOn Pw aaem MW Tema Disinfulim Pmluui MIMI-16r. No. 2 under this treatment strategy would be 11,500 gpd. This would require 2 to 3 tank truck deliveries per day. The existing 75,000 gallons of storage capacity would provide for 6 to 7 days of bleach storage. For the dechlorination process,a dose rate of approximately 6 mg/I of sodium bisulfite with a range of 5 to 8 mg/I would be required. Based on combined average flows from Plant No. I and Plant No. 2 of 243 mgd, sodium bisulfite usage is estimated to be about 4,900 gpd, requiring 1 to 2 tank truck _ deliveries per day. The 78,000 gallons of storage capacity would provide 15 to 16 days of sodium bisulfite storage. All delivery trucks would enter and exit at the main plant entrance located between Banning Avenue and Bushard Street. Strategy 1—Primary Effluent Bleach Addition The initial bleach dose rate would be 25 mg/l with ranges from 20 to 30 mg/I. Typical bleach usage would be 18,300 gpd for the primaries and 4,200 gpd for the secondary effluent. Total bleach consumption for Plant No. 2 under this treatment strategy would be approximately 22,500 gpd, almost twice as much as under Strategy I. This usage would require 5 to 6 tank truck deliveries per day. The existing 75,000 gallons of storage capacity would provide for 3 to 4 days of bleach storage. For the dechlorination process,a dose rate of approximately 12 mg/I of sodium bisulfite with a range of 8 to 15 mg/I would be required. Sodium bisulfite usage is estimated to be about 9,800 gpd, requiring 2 to 3 tank truck deliveries per day. The 78,000 gallons of storage capacity would provide 7 to 8 days of sodium bisulfite storage. All delivery trucks would enter and exit at the main plant entrance located between Banning Avenue and Bushard Street. Chlorine Residual/Sampling Bleach would be dosed using existing plant effluent meters and optimized based on the results of chlorine residual sampling. Residual chlorine would be monitored downstream of the sodium bisulfite injection points to determine the amount of sodium bisulfite to be added. Improvements may include a new sample pump, piping, and analyzer equipment. A second chlorine analyzer unit near Surge Tower No. 2 may be installed to optimize dechlorination dosing. Similar to operations at Plant 1, initially District staff would manually monitor and compare chlorine residual to confirm proper operation of the automated chlorine analyzers. The actual configuration of the control technology will be determined during the design phase of the proposed project. Additionally, the existing effluent sampler will be used to monitor the normal final effluent parameters. These systems may be operated manually during the start-up and ramp-up periods. Automated systems and controls would be integrated into the plant's computer system. MSD Addendum No.7 12 "1102 ft...Shoe Term Disinfediw PN. FSA/]01.16r. TRANSMON FROM TEMPORARY TO PERMANENT SHORT-TERM FACILITIES It is anticipated that the temporary short-term facilities will remain in service for six to nine months until the permanent short-term facility construction and operation start-up is complete. The temporary facilities would be removed as necessary for construction and implementation of the permanent facilities. Operation of the temporary facilities would continue during construction of the permanent _ facilities and would continue until the permanent facilities are fully operational. It is anticipated that the permanent short-term facilities would remain in full service for a three to five- year period while long-term alternatives are being developed and implemented. The short-term facilities would serve as back-up facilities after the long-term facilities are installed. 3.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED On March 6, 1998, the Regional Board and U.S. EPA, Region 9,jointly adopted Order No. 99-5, NPDES No. CA0110604, renewing the waste discharge requirements for the OCSD ocean outfall discharge of combined primary and secondary treated wastewater from its Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. Order No. 98-5 contains receiving water limits designed to protect the health of people who come in contact with the ocean waters(both nearshore and offshore waters')that may be affected by the OCSD effluent discharge. Receiving Water Limitation D.I.a.l. requires that certain bacterial objectives shall be maintained within the nearshore zone and within the offshore zone to a depth of 10 fat to protect the water contact recreational use of those waters. Due to the location of the OCSD outfall (at 55 to (200 feet) depth and approximately 8.2 km (about 5 miles, which includes a 4-mile long outfall with a 1.1 mile long diffuser) offshore of the Huntington Beach area, just north of the Santa Ana River)and the ocean characteristics around the outfall,disinfection of the wastewater has not been necessary to maintain compliance with these objectives. The discharge consistently meets these receiving water limits,as shown by receiving water monitoring data. In recent years, the waters off Huntington Beach have been plagued periodically with high concentrations of bacteria that have resulted in the closure of the beaches to water-contact recreation. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the source(s) of the problem. To date, none of these studies has directly linked the problem to OCSD's wastewater discharge. However, recent monitoring work conducted by OCSD has detected low levels of total coliform bacteria, related to the discharge plume, at the surface at a sampling station about three miles from shore. The results also showed plume-related bacteria within one half mile of shore in the deep waters of submarine Newport Canyon. Neanhav w wrs are within a zanw bomded by the shoreline and a durance of l.o0ofeel from the shoreline or the 30-fam depth comet, whlchewr k further from the shorelme. Offshore ,w..are between the nearshme oars and the limit ofocean waters ofthe Stare o e..three miles from the shoreline.) Me Adda No.r 13 0911642 Pvmmm,Sh Tem IXunfmm Rolm ESA 1201.10, Although neither the limitations in Order No. 98-5 nor the bacterial standards for beach water3 established by the Department of Health Services (DHS) pursuant to Assembly Bill (A.B.) 411 were exceeded,Regional Board staff determined it prudent to amend Order No. 98-5 to modify the bacterial limits to ensure that water-contact recreational activities in both offshore and nearshore ocean waters are not threatened by this discharge. On July 19, 2002, the Regional Board adopted Order No. Rg- 2002-0055, which amends Order No. 98-5 to require disinfection and modify bacterial limits. The amended Order revises Receiving Water Limitation D.I.a.l to require that bacterial objectives shall be_ maintained throughout the water column in the offshore zone,rather than only in the top ten feet. The Order also requires chlorination with sodium hypochlorite and dechlorination with sodium bisulfate since this disinfection method can be most readily implemented in the short-term. This Order went into effect on August 12, 2002. OCSD's stated operational goal with the disinfection process is to achieve both the 2001 Ocean Plan bacterial objectives(as reflected in Order No. R8-2002-0055) and the A.B.411 bacterial standards after initial dilution. Wastewater disinfection with chlorine usually produces a chlorine residual. Chlorine and its reaction products are toxic to aquatic life. Order No. 98-5 did not contain any limits on the amount of chlorine residual that may be in the effluent since disinfection with chlorine was not contemplated at the time. The amended order now contains limitations for total residual chlorine. The amended order also revised acute toxicity limits and test requirements. Order No. 98-5 specified acute toxicity limits and msa requirements based on the 1997 Ocean Plan, which in turn were based on best available technology. The 1997 Ocean Plan was revised effective December 3, 2001 (2001 Ocean Plan). The 2001 Ocean Plan modified the procedures to develop acute toxicity limits in permits and changed the testing protocols for determining compliance with those limits. Acute toxicity effluent limits are now based on the acute toxicity water quality objective that is specified in the Ocean Plan. In addition, the 2001 Ocean Plan now requires the use of marine test species instead of freshwater species when measuring compliance. OCSD began operation of temporary short-term disinfection facilities on August 12, 2002 in order to achieve compliance with the new receiving water limitations. Operation of the permanent short-term facilities is anticipated to last three to five years while long-tern alternatives are being evaluated, designed,and implemented. 4.0 OCSD BACKGROUND, STRATEGIC PLAN AND PROGRAM EIR OCSD BACKGROUND The District currently discharges 243 million gallons per day (MGD) of treated wastewater into the ocean. The ocean outfall pipe releases the treated wastewater 4.2 miles offshore at a depth of 200 feet. The effluent is currently a blend of 50 percent advanced primary and 50 percent secondary treated wastewater. All wastewater treated at the facilities receives advanced primary treatment. Plant No. I 2 There standards twlude oml mdfecal colif m,w well m enlerwaccm.anmher type ofhaclerial indtcatw. The Ocean Plan and A.B. 411 sondwd fw tool and fecal colifwm are verysimilar. ocso•ea mrm.r 14 WiMn Pemumni Sinn Tenn n.f..Rei>+ ESAt MI-i". treats approximately 87 MOD of sewage. Approximately, 60 MOD receives secondary treatment through trickling filters or the activated sludge plant. Plant No. 2 treats approximately 156 MOD of sewage. Sixty-five (65) MGD receives secondary treatment in the oxygen activated sludge process. The treated sewage Flows from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 through interplant pipelines. The Flows are then blended at the Ocean Outfall Booster Station(GOBS)and pumped to the ocean outfall. Current ocean permit requirements (for 30-day average discharge) are 100 mg/L of Biochemical _ Oxygen Demand (BOD) and 60 mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS). The average values for the District's treated wastewater are 69 mg/L BOD and 52 mg/L TSS,well within the permitted limits. The District has an extensive ocean-monitoring program as required by the EPA and the Regional Board. This program includes routine monitoring of 17 offshore stations around the outfall for various parameters such as temperature, salinity, pH, ammonium, grease, and E. cull bacteria. Additionally, 17 stations on the shoreline are sampled 3-5 times a week for total and fecal bacteria, and enterococci bacteria. The monitoring is performed to evaluate potential environmental and public health effects from the discharge of the treated wastewater. The Ocean Monitoring Group also performs various ocean studies for plume tracking. 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN AND PROGRAM EIR The PEIR identifies the District's Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) proposed to meet future demand for wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities through 2020. Projects are proposed to replace and rehabilitate sewer collection systems, expand and upgrade the Districts two wastewater treatment plants, provide adequate discharge capacity for projected peak Flows, provide additional treated wastewater to the Orange County Water District for expanded water reuse, and study the feasibility of other improvements. The objectives of the 1999 Strategic Plan are as follows: • To plan for the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal facilities to serve the needs of the District's service area through 2020. • To ensure compliance with existing and anticipated ocean discharge permit conditions, including the requirements of the 301(h) modified (secondary treatment waiver) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit for the discharge. • To Recommend projects that meet the communities needs, protect public health, are technically feasible,and are cost effective and environmentally responsible;and • To maximize the use of treated effluent for water recycling. OCSD certified the Program EIR for the Strategic Plan in October 1999 and began implementing the proposed facility improvements associated with the preferred alternative— Scenario 2. Scenario 2 OCSD AE "mNo.7 15 W/Ib92 rmn tSnap Tm Dimfuum R*i ESA/ali.l W. involves continued provision for treatment to produce a 50:50 blend of advanced primary and secondary effluent coupled with implementation of the GWRS project. .Facility improvements are proposed to occur in phases over the twenty-year plan. PEIR Tables 3-7, 3- 8, and 3-9 present the four phases of facilities improvement anticipated. PEIR Figures 3-7 and 3-10 illustrate the location and phasing of facilities improvement under the preferred program alternative at Plants No.] and No 2, respectively. PEIR Section 3.7.6, Construction Methods and Schedule,_ describes the nature and magnitude of construction activities associated with the proposed facilities program at both treatment plants including construction methods, estimated excavation volumes and estimated truck trips during construction activities. PEIR Section 3.7.7, Operational Scenario, describes future plant operation characteristics including staffing,energy and water demand and usage, chemical usage and 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This section reviews each of the environmental factors identified on the CEQA Environmental Checklist(CEQA Guidelines Appendix G)and describes either why there would be no impact or less- than-significant impact, where applicable, or why and where there would be a potential significant impact associated with construction and/or operation of the temporary disinfection facilities that has already been disclosed and mitigated as part of the PEIR. The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project. ❑ land Use and Planning Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services E. Agricultural Resources ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Geology and Soils • Hazards/Hazardous Materials ❑ Cultural Resources Hydrology and Water Quality ❑ Noise 0 Recreation ❑ Air Quality ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance 5.1 LAND USE,RECREATION AND AESTHETICS Land Use and Aesthetic issues associated with facilities construction at the treatment plant were addressed in Section 6.1 (6.1-1 to 6.1-12) of the PEIR. The PEIR found that construction of the proposed facilities over several phases would cause short-term disruption of adjacent land uses that could be mitigated to less-than-significant with mitigation involving compliance with local ordinances and encroachment permits. The PEIR found that siting and operation of the new and,expanded facilities at both treatment plants would not alter existing land use onsite and would be compatible with surrounding land uses, thus having a less than significant effect on land use with no mitigation DCSD x00entlum No.7 16 09116a2 Pammm,8 Torn th.d..Pojal rsF/x11-163. required. With respect to visual impacts, the PEIR found that mitigation was required to reduce to less-than-significant potential visual impacts associated with construction of new 35-40 tall digesters, which would be noticeable offsite above the perimeter walls and fencing, and possible tree removal. The PEIR found that implementation of the proposed Urban Design Element of the Strategic Plan would ensure that views from adjacent land uses would be screened to reduce the visual impacts of the new facilities to less-than-significant. Reclamation Plant No. I is located on a 108-acre site bounded by Ellis Avenue on the north,the Santa Ana River on the east, Garfield Avenue on the south, and Ward Street to the west (Figure 1). The plant site lies within the City of Fountain Valley. The site is zoned Specific Plan and is located in one of the City of Fountain Valley's three Specific Plan Areas. The southwestern comer near Ward and Garfield was previously leased to Garfield RV Self Storage, a self-storage and recreational vehicle storage business but is now vacant and will be used for an Engineering Trailer Complex to house about 70 personnel (OCSD PEIR Addendum No. 5,adopted June, 2002). Land uses surrounding the treatment plant include residential, industrial and mixed commercial uses. It is bordered to the northeast by the Orange County Water District's Water Factory 21 treatment facilities and administrative offices for the District. The Sanitation District offices are also located at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Land uses to the north of Ellis Avenue are commercial and manufacturing facilities of mixed use. West of Ward Avenue (Huntington Beach) and across the Santa Ana River to the east lie (City of Costa Mesa) residential neighborhoods of older single-family homes. South of Garfield lies mixed uses including commercial(nursery)and public utility facilities(electrical switching and transmission facilities) that lie within the jurisdiction of the City of Huntington Beach. There is a bikeway along the Santa Ana River channel to the east and the San Diego Freeway and on and off ramps lie immediately east of the treatment plant's northeasterly corner. The treatment plant is fenced and landscaped which provides for good visual screening from most directions. Treatment Plant No. 2 is located adjacent to the mouth of the Santa Ana River at the southern comer of the City of Huntington Beach on a 110-acre site. The site is bounded by Brookhurst Street on the west, the Orange County flood control channel that was recently restored as Talbert Marsh by the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy on the south, and the Santa Ana River on the east. Some apartments adjoin the vacant northerly portions of the site. The site is designated Public and zoned Industrial by the City of Huntington Beach. The treatment facilities occupy the southerly two-thirds of the site. The proposed permanent short-term disinfection facilities would be located on OCSD treatment plant property within the existing fence line at both Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. Construction and operation of the proposed permanent short-teen disinfection facilities would not alter land uses at Plant No. I or No. 2. The proposed facilities would not conflict with any applicable local plan or policy including general plans, specific plans, zoning ordinances and habitat conservation Plans. The City of Fountain Valley designates the Plant No. I site as a Specific Plan Area. Adopted in 1993, the Sanitation District Plant No. 1 Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan. It OCSD AdOmdum No.7 17 MI"2 ra .S Tam Diunfatim rmlen ESAINI.1" describes existing uses and provides guidance for the continued use and the proposed future development of the site. It provides detailed policies, standards and criteria for the development or redevelopment of the Specific Plan area. Namely, proposed structures, exterior storage and/or _landscaping that can be viewed from adjacent streets or properties shall be submitted to the City's Planning/Building Director for design review. Thepermanent short-term disinfection facilities would not significantly alter views of the treatment facility. For bleach storage,the three existing temporary tanks that are approximately 12 feet high would be removed and two to three new permanent tanks . that are 24 feet high would be installed behind the existing secondary clarifier. The new tanks would not be as tall as adjacent structures, including the 35-foot high truck loading facility to the north and the 30-fcot high DAFT scrubbers. Under the Strategic Plan new digesters will be constructed at Plant No. I that will be 35-40 feet high,representing the tallest structures at the plant Existing landscaping along the eastern and southern property boundary (along the Santa Ana River) would screen views of the proposed bleach facility from offsite. No additional landscaping would be installed as part of this project. The District is proceeding with a landscaping program previously adopted(addressed by PEIR Addendum No.2,November 2001). Plant No. 2 is located in an area designated by the City of Huntington Beach General Plan as Public, which allows facilities such as public utilities. The city holds an easement to extend Banning Avenue through the northern portion of the plant to the Santa Ana River. The proposed disinfection facilities would not encroach on the easement and future roadway area. The same equipment would be installed for either strategy that is implemented. For the bleach storage, six existing 15-foot high tanks would be used. For the sodium bisulfate storage, three to four new 19,500-gallon capacity storage tanks would be installed. These new tanks would be 18 feet high and 12 feet in diameter. The addition of the new tanks would not significantly alter views of treatment plant site from surrounding properties as the tanks are largely blocked from view by the existing 120-inch outfall pipeline that extends around the eastern site perimeter and sits about 14 feet off the ground. Thus, all but approximately four feet of the new tanks would be blocked from view. Further, these tanks will not be visually prominent; there are two digesters just to the west that are approximately 45 feet high. Again, the District is implementing the Urban Design Element of the Strategic Plan,which the PEIR found would mitigation to less-than-significant the effects of proposed facility construction at Plant No.2. There are no designated recreation areas within either of the two treatment plant sites. The Santa Ana River trail lies adjacent to both treatment plants. As summarized at the beginning of this discussion, the PEIR found that construction activities under the adopted Strategic Plan program would have short-term impacts on adjacent land use, such as the bike trail, that could be mitigated. The PEIR concluded that operation of the new and expanded facilities would not adversely affect adjacent uses. Construction and operation of the bleach and bisulfate facilities at Plant No. 2 would not change this impact assessment. With respect to potential effect on habitat conservation areas, the Talbert Marsh area lies adjacent to Plant No. 2, on the southern side of plant. The disinfection facilities would not be constructed near this wetland area and would not affect the wetland management activities or the biological resources that occur there. - OCSD ALdmdmo No.r 18 03lllv➢] Pmnmmi Snort Tm DimfWim Projn+ FSA/x11.16r. 5.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Project construction activities and the resulting facilities would be confined to the already disturbed area that is now devoted to wastewater treatment and reserved for process facilities. No agricultural land exists at either of the treatment plant sites. The PEIR identified no potential impacts to agricultural resources(PEIR Section 6.1, land Use,pages 6.1-1 to 6.1-12). The project modifications would contribute no additional impacts to agricultural resources. 5.3 POPULATION AND HOUSING The PEIR presented a comprehensive discussion of the growth inducement potential and secondary effects of growth associated with OCSD's long-term plans to provide wastewater management service to meet the needs of planned growth in the communities throughout its service area. PEIR Chapter I I presents this analysis. The Strategic Plan identified the projects needed to provide for phased expansion of OCSD's collection,treatment, and disposal system capacities to meet increasing service demand associated with planned growth. The concoction and operation of the short-term permanent disinfection facilities would not increase or decrease the treatment capacity at either plant. The proposed project would provide for further treatment of the wastewater Flows currently handled at the plant. This project would have no growth inducement potential and would not require displacement of housing or people. The proposed facilities would be constructed on the District's two existing treatment plant sites. 5.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Geology, soils, and seismic issues were addressed in PEIR Section 6.6 (pages 6.6-1 to 6.6-5). Both treatment plant sites are Bat, and largely paved. There are no slope or soil stability issues at these sites. In unpaved areas the soils have been extensively modified, primarily for sludge drying basins, which historically occupied most of the open space at each site. There would be little earthwork to construct the proposed short-term facilities and the proposed tanks, pumps and some of the pipeline would be installed above ground; as shown on Table 1, above, much of the new pipeline would be located within existing tunnels. Some limited earthwork would be associated with the installation of underground piping and development of secondary spill containment around new storage tanks. At Plant No. 1 the permanent bleach facility would be installed at grade within a 2,800 square foot area. Minor excavation would be conducted for placement of approximately 12 inches of gravel rock base and 12 inches for the concrete pad to support the tank facilities, along with a few additional areas where one-foot thickened slab sections would be installed. About 300 linear feet of pipeline would be buried in a shallow trench approximately 2 feet wide by 3.5 feet deep. At Plant No. 2 the bleach facility already exists, so excavation needs would be limited to installation of truck aprons,requiring a one-foot gravel base and one-foot concrete pads or two feet total excavation in a 1,200 square foot area. For the bisulfate facility, a two-foot deep excavation of a 3,000 square foot area would be required to install the proper gravel base and concrete pad. Buried pipeline installation at.Plant 2 would involve about 500 feet of pipe in a shallow trench. - MD AEdoo6m No.) 19 09/160] P —o S Ten Nonfocoon ftjm ESA/xl1-169. Given the flat, largely paved nature of the proposed sites, and the limited earthwork, there would be limited potential for soil erosion. The District and its contractors would implement best management practices during construction to manage erosion from stortnwater, in accordance with the District's Storm Water Management Plan and adopted PEIR mitigation measure 6.7-la. The proposed project site would not disturb more than an acre and would not require a separate NPDES construction permit for storm water management. The PEIR addressed the impacts of substantial earthwork(ranging from 56,000 to 100,000 cubic yards of cumulative excavation volumes at Plant No I and 15,000 to 31,000 _ cubic yards at Plant No. 2) during the multi-phase development of facilities under the Strategic Plan. Construction of the short-term permanent disinfection facilities would represent less than 500 cubic. yards of excavation and would not alter the PEIR analysis of this impact. Both treatment plants occur in a region subject to earthquakes that could occur along a series of fault systems. The nearest fault zone is the Newport-Ingelwood Fault Zone. Other major fault structures in the region include the San Andreas Fault, San Jacinto Fault, Whittier-Elsinore fault, and Palos Verdes fault. As discussed in PEIR Impact 6.6-1 (PEIR page 6.6-3),any facilities constructed at the treatment plants would be located in area susceptible to primary and secondary seismic hazards (including groundshaking, liquefaction, and settlement). Mitigation measures requiring secondary spill containment, adopted as part of the PEIR (measures 6.6-2b) and included in the design of the short- term disinfection facilities, would reduce the potential for significant impact associated with a chemical spill during a seismic event. Secondary spill containment already exists for the existing storage tanks proposed for use in the disinfection process and would be installed for any new tanks constructed. In accordance with PEIR measures 6.6-Ib, the District would design and construct new facilities in accordance with District seismic standards and/or meet or exceed the requirements of the most recent edition of the California Building Code. Further, the District will implement its Spill Prevention,Containment and Countermeasures Plan in the event of a spill(PEIR measures 6.6.2a). The project would not expose people to any increased risk of injury associated with geologic hazards of seismic activity. 5.5 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Hydrology and water quality issues at the treatment plant sites were addressed in PEIR Section 3.7 (PEIR pages 3.7-1 to 3.7-9). The marine environment including water quality, public health and aquatic resources was addressed in PEIR Chapter 5.0. FLOODING The District's Plants No. 1 and No. 2 are adjacent to the Santa Ana River and within the 100-year flood plan of the river. The District's facilities are protected from flooding by walls and levees that were constructed by the Amy Corps of Engineers in 1995. Construction of the temporary disinfection facilities would not alter the flood risk at the plant sites. WSD Adlm l 7 20 09/IbDr P .,Shm Tam Diwfa-Mujtt. FSAlral-165. MARINE WATER QUALITY Disinfection of the OCSD effluent prior to ocean discharge will reduce pathogens, thereby improving water quality and providing an additional measure of safety for public health with respect to recreational use of marine waters. The District intends to provide a level of disinfection that complies with the regulatory water quality standards established for body-contact recreation after initial dilution. For operation of the permanent short-term disinfection facilities the District proposes to _ conduct manual sampling, monitoring, reporting, and adjustment of chlorination levels. Bench-wale laboratory testing to date has indicated that disinfection of the effluent is not likely to change effluent quality enough to preclude compliance with the pending modification of the OCSD's NPDES effluent discharge permit as proposed by RWQCB and EPA. The only permit condition that has been of increasing concern is toxicity. The use of bleach and sodium bisulfite(for dechlorination)(see below) has not been shown to contribute to higher toxicity based on the bench-scale work done to date. Testing will continue in the future to evaluate permit compliance and the effectiveness of disinfection on bacterial levels in the receiving waters. Wastewater disinfection with chlorine usually produces a chlorine residual. Chlorine and its reaction products are toxic to aquatic life. In order to remove chlorine from the effluent prior to ocean discharge so that there is no chlorine residual that could impact aquatic life, the District will dechlorinate the effluent through the application of sodium bisulfite. The NPDES permit requires this dechlorination and establishes chlorine residual limits that the District must meet. OCSD conducts routine monitoring of the effluent to determine concentrations of regulated constituents and confirm compliance in accordance with its NPDES permit. Monitoring of chlorine residual will be added to this routine monitoring. Chlorine addition would be adjusted based on chlorine residual measured by automated chlorine analyzers. The District will sample and monitor chlorine residual manually during the initial stages of operation in order to compare the chlorine analyzer readings and confirm proper operation of the automated analyzers. The effect of chlorination and dechlorination on effluent toxicity has been investigated by the District. The testing was conducted using the same test methods and animals required in the District's then current NPDES permit(Order 98-5). In addition,two marine acute toxicity tests were used, as it was anticipated that these would be incorporated into the new NPDES permit modifications. The amended order revised acute toxicity limits and test requirements based on the 2001 Ocean Plan's modified procedures to develop acute toxicity limits in permits and testing protocols for determining compliance with those limits. Acute toxicity effluent limits are now based on the acute toxicity water quality objective that.is specified in the Ocean Plan. In addition,the 2001 Ocean Plan now requires the use of marine test species instead of freshwater species when measuring compliance. See the report on Short-term Ocean Outjall Bacteria Reduction Project, July 17, 2002 for a review of the testing methods and results. The testing on chlorinated-dechlorinated effluent showed that this new treatment method did not increase existing effluent toxicity levels in these tests. While some variations in chemical parameters were noted, all parameters remained within permit requirements after chlorination and dechlorination and no significant production of adverse chemical byproducts associated with the chlorination-dechlorination process is anticipated. As noted above, the effluent will be routinely monitored to confirm compliance with all discharge permit water quality requirements. OCSD A�W7 21 MOM MmanmiS Terri Dislnnu.Rolm FSA/301.168. STORM WATER The PEIR analyzes the potential for the project to impact surface water as well as groundwater during facility construction and operation in Section 6.7. The PEIR established mitigation measures to avoid and minimize impacts to water quality related to construction activities. The adopted mitigation measures (Measure 6.7-la through M establish guidelines to be implemented by the contractors to minimize impacts to hydrology and water quality. The conditions include the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent erosion and sedimentation to avoid significant adverse - impacts to surface water quality and the storing and staging of all equipment in designated staging areas. Both plants have internal drainage systems that collect stormwater and any drainage within treatment process areas for treatment. Only stormwater that does not come in contact with the treatment process area, such as along the perimeter roads, is allowed to drain off-site to unpaved areas on the plant site. The proposed project facility sites are within the treatment process area, therefore stornwater would be collected for treatment. GROUNDWATER + Although groundwater can be encountered at shallow depths at both plant sites, no significant subsurface earthwork or construction would occur with this project and no site dewatering would be required. 5.6 AIR QUALITY Air Quality impacts were addressed in PEIR Section 6.5 (PEIR pages 6.5-1 to 6.5- 21). The PEIR concluded that implementation of the treatment system contemplated in the Strategic Plan would result in significant and unavoidable short-term construction emissions impacts and operational mobile source emissions. Construction Although the construction of the proposed facilities would add to the overall emission calculations of the PEIR, due to the small scale of the project and the minimal amount of grading and construction activity to accommodate the project, these incremental increases would not amount to a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified construction-related air quality impacts. Project construction will only require an estimated 5-6 trucks per day and between 20-40 vehicle trips over a two to four-month period. As discussed under Section 5.4— Geology and Soils, above, the PEIR evaluated the impacts associated with implementation of a range of facilities development scenarios that included a range of excavation quantities and construction equipment activity. The air quality effects that could result from construction of the permanent, short-term disinfection facilities are covered within the PEIR analysis of effects. Most of the facilities would be constructed above ground and earthwork that could generate dust would be limited to construction of concrete pads for some of the new storage tanks and installation of approximately 500 to 1,000 feet of buried pipeline. Dust control measures adopted by the District (PEIR mitigation measure 6.5-Ic, page 6.5-13)would be implemented during construction as needed. DCSD AEEm6um No.7 22 W16Vr P alms Shan Tnm oisinf¢non Pmjen ESAIM-163. Operation Project operation would increase truck deliveries of chemicals to Plant No. I or Plant No. 2 beyond what is currently used for the temporary facilities. However, it would not increase truck deliveries beyond levels addressed in the PEIR in the assessment of mobile source impacts. Chemical storage and use would occur within enclosed facilities. Facilities operation would not emit air pollutants that would require implementation of emission controls to comply with SCAQMD - standards and regulations. No air quality permits would be required. Chemicals to be used in the disinfection process are liquid forth not gaseous(sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfite). There is no risk associated with the release of toxic air emissions and the project would not increase impacts to any sensitive receptors in the areas surrounding the two treatment plants. Secondary spill containment facilities exist for existing storage tanks to be used and would be installed for any new tanks constructed to capture any release of the liquid chemicals. 5.7 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION Traffic impacts were addressed in PER Section 6.2, PEIR pages 6.2-1 to 6.2-7. The PEIR analyzed traffic impacts relating to the construction and operation of treatment facility contemplated in the 1999 Strategic Plan. As noted in the PEIR, all construction and operational traffic impacts could be mitigated to a level of less-than-significant. Construction Project construction activity would not result in significant increase in traffic trips or changed local traffic flow and use patterns. The PEIR evaluated potential construction phases involving construction crews ranging from 100 to 500 workers generating approximately 150 to 750 trips per day and found that notification of local communities coupled with efforts to minimize peak hour trips was sufficient mitigation to make construction traffic impacts less-than-significant. For the disinfection facilities,an estimated 5-6 trucks per day and 20-40 vehicle trips per day would be needed to support construction activities over a three to five-month period. The construction of the short-term disinfection facilities would have a less-than-significant effect on local traffic flow and no mitigation would be required. If this project is constructed in conjunction with other major or multiple Strategic Plan projects,then the District will continue to implement PER measure 6.2-1 to coordinate construction traffic associated with various projects underway at its treatment plants. According to Measure 6.2-1, for each major project or construction period,the District would complete a detailed construction schedule and notify the cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. Construction vehicles should be run on a schedule to minimize travel on the regional transportation facilities during peak traffic periods. Operation Operation of the disinfection process will require the delivery of one to two tank trucks per day of sodium hypochlorite at Plant No. I and three to nine trucks per day at Plant No. 2 for sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfite delivery. This will result in an estimated increase of up to 1 I trucks per day,or approximately 330 per month. Currently,chemical trips average 6 per day or up to 180 per MD Aa .N .r 23 owiwi ra .aloe T.Ditinr..Pqm UA/Z01-168. month. With the additional chemical usage,total chemical deliveries are anticipated to increase to up to 17 per day, with 13 daily trips at Plant No. 2 and four at Plant No. 1. Overall, the chemical deliveries represent a small percentage of the vehicle trips per day that are needed to support the District operations, which total between 450-500 trips a day or 13,500 per month. Employee trips account for about 80 percent of all trips. The increased truck trips associated with operation of the temporary disinfection facilities would not significantly affect levels of service at local intersections. As identified in the PEIR, the District will continue to implement measures 6.2-2b to avoid peak _ traffic hours for chemical delivery when possible. 5.8 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Biological resources at the treatment plants were addressed in PEIR Section 6.3 (Pages 6.3-1 to 6.3-4). The PEIR analyzed the biological setting for the two treatment plant sites and determined, given the urban setting that no impacts to biological resources were expected. The proposed sites for the temporary disinfection facilities are located within the treatment plant boundaries on paved areas previously developed with treatment facilities. No vegetation occurs at these sites and no wildlife use occurs at these sites. Construction and operation of the permanent short-term disinfection facilities would have not impact on terrestrial biological resources. See the discussion of hydrology and water quality issues above for a discussion of potential project effects on the marine environment. 5.9 MINERAL RESOURCES All modifications will be to previously disturbed land. As described in the PEIR (page 6.6-1), the soils underlying Plant No. I and No 2 have been extensively modified by man; there are no documented mineral resources on the sites. Further, construction of the short-term permanent disinfection facilities involves only very limited,shallow excavations(2-3 feet deep)that would affect only previously disturbed soils. 5.10 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Hazards and Hazardous Materials issues were addressed in PEIR Section 6.9(PEIR pages 6.9-1 to 6.9- 7). Sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfite are potentially hazardous materials if not properly managed. However, these chemicals are routinely used in wastewater treatment plants and other industrial settings. The District currently uses sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfite in the operation of the temporary disinfection facilities. Additional staff training was performed with the . implementation of the temporary disinfection facilities. A refresher training session of approximately 6 hours was provided to about 60 staff. On-site spill prevention, containment,and clean up,as well as health and safety issues,was included in the training. These chemicals would be delivered to the Plants in tank trucks licensed to transport these materials and off-loaded into storage tanks with containment structures to prevent spillage or leaks from entering the surrounding environment. Chemical deliveries are normally scheduled during the regular shift (7:00 am to 5:00 pm) for safety reasons during unloading. The chemicals are liquid form and pose less risk than alternative options for disinfection including chlorine gas, sulfur dioxide, or liquid MSD Md.d..M.7 24 N/1W2 Pm .Shoe Tam Disinanion P,*. BA/MI-M. oxygen. Neither chemical has the potential to form vapor clouds if accidentally released that could travel off site. Storage of the chemicals with the secondary spill containment would not pose a risk to surrounding land uses. Off-site spills will be handled by the chemical vendor and/or transport company,as under current chemical transport protocols. The Fountain Valley Specific Plan for Plant No. I requires that the District submit a hazardous materials plan to the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department for review and approval. As is its _ current practice, the District will submit an updated plan to both the Fountain Valley and City of Huntington Beach Fire Departments incorporating information on the increased delivery, storage and use of sodium hypochloritc,and the added use of sodium bisulfate. 5.11 NOISE Noise issues associated with construction and operation of facilities at the treatment plants were addressed in the PEIR in Section 6.4 (PEIR pages 6.4-1 to 6.4-12). The PEIR concluded that construction activities resulting from implementation of the Strategic Plan could intermittently and temporarily generate noise levels above ambient noise levels and that these impacts are significant and unavoidable. On the other hand, the PEIR concluded that Operational Noise impact levels were less than significant. Construction Because the proposed permanent short-term disinfection facilities would be installed aboveground with little earthwork and subsurface foundation work required,there would not be pile driving or other major excavation work that could result in significant construction noise. The significant unavoidable impacts identified in the PEIR related to extensive grading activities and periodic use of jackhammers and pile drivers, which are not required to construct the proposed project. Moreover, construction of the facilities will be temporary and is projected to last for a three to five month period. The District would continue to comply with relevant PEIR mitigation measures and local requirements that address construction activities at the plant sites, including PEIR measure 6.4-Ia: construction activities will be limited to between the hours of 7:30 am and 5:30 pm and as necessary to comply with local ordinances. Operation Operation of the permanent short-term facilities would not increase noise levels at either plant. New pumps would replace existing pumps in some cases and all pumps would be contained within structures that would reduce exterior noise levels. The new facilities would not increase noise levels at the fence line of either plant. 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES/UTILITIES Public Services issues at the treatment plants were addressed in PEIR Section 6.8(PEIR pages 6.8-1 to 6.8-4). The PEIR found no significant effects of proposed facility construction on other services or utilities including police, fire, security, or water (PEIR page 6.8-3). The PEIR indicated that OCSD A&Mndum No.7 25 W/1"2 Pmnmm1 Mo.T.Mlmf Zion Pmlml FSA l l01 168. construction of major new or additional treatment facilities as proposed under the Strategic Plan could cause short-tenn disruption of the wastewater treatment process. However, the construction and operation of the permanent short-term disinfection facilities would not disrupt the existing treatment or disinfection process. The temporary facilities would be removed as necessary for construction and implementation of the permanent facilities. Operation of the temporary facilities would continue during construction of the permanent facilities and would continue until the permanent facilities are fully operational. _ 5.13 CULTURAL RESOURCES As noted in the PEIR(PEIR page 4-26),the 1977 EIS prepared by the District indicated that there are no cultural resources located at either Plant No. I or No. 2. These conclusions were based on a thorough review of the literature and field surveys conducted at the two sites. Moreover,the 1977 EIS concluded that extensive modification of both sites over the years, both historically from Flooding and more recently from plant facilities development, further reduces the possibility of encountering previously unknown resources during construction. In addition, installation of the short-term disinfection facilities would involve little earthwork as most facilities (the temporary tanks and the majority of pipelines) would be installed above ground. Thus, it is unlikely that cultural resource would be encountered during construction on the proposed facilities and no impacts to cultural resources are expected. OCSD AtldmEum No.7 26 09I16gI ramenmi Sl Tam Mmfwm Rojen FSA/MI I W. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (714)962-2411 m a H.O('SD.com Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Street Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018