The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-08-21.., . ' ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DIS T RICT ME ETING DATE: 8/2 1/02 TI ME : 6:00 p.m. (MURP HY) ........................ ALVAREZ ...................... o.-__ (SIMON IA N ) .................... ANDERSON ................ J_.~ __ (FLORY) ........................ ~.~./~ ... _·_ (M ILLER) .......................... EtAADY ........................ ~ (YOS T ) ............................ CAMPBELL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. v (BOARDM AN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE .............. v- (CRAN DA LL ) .................... COOK, LAU RANN.......... v/' (S HAWVER ) .................... DONAHUE ..................... -1L_ (UN DERHILL) ................... EC KENRODE ................. ~ (SC HAF ER ) ...................... FERRYMAN ................... ....!:::::'.'.: (DUVALL ) ......................... GULLIXSON ................... ~ (DEBOLT) ......................... JEMPSA ...................... _L_ (WORLEY) ........................ KAWAS HI MA............... _k::::...._ (SMI TH ) ............................ KROM........................ ~ (BROA DWATER ) ............. LE YES .......................... ~ (DA LY) .............................. MCCRACKEN ............... v (CHR ISTY) ....................... MCGUIGAN .................. ~ __ (S IMONO FF ) .................... MOORE........................ ~ __ (EPPERSON) ................... NEUGEBAUER .............. _lL... (FRESCH I) ....................... PATTERSON ................. ~ (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY ........................ ~ (ADAMS) ......................... RIDGEWAY ................... .Q_ (DOW) .............................. S IGLER ......................... c;_ (SMITH, CHUCK) ............. SI LVA........................... / (B LAKE) ............................ WALKER ....................... ~ STAFF: Ande rson i./ Gh ire lli v Kyle Lu dwin ~ Mathews ~ Miles .~ Murphy ~ Ooten v Tomko ~ Streed ~ OTHERS: Woodruff v- Andrus -Nixon - 06/19/02 G :\wp .dta\admin\BS \DIRECTOR\Directors Ro ll Ca ll.doc < -~ .. SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT) lJ l LJ D j/ k 1 hi\, ,~ BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM H:\WP.DTA\ADMIN \BS\FORMS\S IGN-IN FOR M.DOC STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2 , I hereby cert if y that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on (21.if=J -Ol I , 200 2-,_ was dul y posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on a~~ /J , 200 ::2.... ,--,,/4/ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ,1J da y of ~a""'-"-1~~--· 200 )-.__ G:\WP. DT A \ADMIN\BS \FORMS \AG ENDA CERTIFICATION .DOC AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT JOINT MEETING RE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM August 21, 2002 6:00 PM ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com www.ocwd .com In accordance with the requ irements of California Government Code Section 54954.2 , this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Orange County Sanitation District's Administrative Offices and in the lobby of the Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue , Fountain Valley, CA not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretaries . In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action , it will be done in compliance with Section 54954 .2(b ) as an emergency item , or that there is a need to take immed iate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com . Upon entering the District's ·web site , please navigate to the Board of Directors section . INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Orange County Water District (OCWD) Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD ) 1 VISITOR PARTICIPATION Members of the audience wishing to address the Boards on items of interest to the public are requested to identify themselves . If the matter on which they wish to comment is an Agenda item, the visitor will be called on when that matter comes up for consideration on the Agenda . Speakers may be limited to three minutes or less. JOINT BOARD WORKSHOP 1 . Groundwater Replenishment System Project Review Irv Pickler, OCWD Director & Chair, GWR System JCC Norm Eckenrode , OCSD Director & Vi ce-Chair, GWR System JCC Project A. Status Report B . Public Information & Education Program Status C . Project Cost Update D . Project Schedule Update E . Status of Joint Power's Agreem ent 2 . ADJOURNMENT/RECESS a . OCSD: Adjournment b. OCWD: Recess . Reconvene in 5 m inutes for continuation of regular Board Meeting 2 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: August 21 , 2002 TO: Boards of Directors FROM: Virginia Grebbien Blake Anderson Staff Contact: Bill Everest SUBJECT: PROJECT STATUS REPORT SUMMARY Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01 Cost Estimate: N/A General Counsel Approval: N/ A Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes A presentation will be made at the meeting summarizing the status of the GWR System Project and other background information. The presentation will cover the following topics: • Current and Projected Water Needs in Southern California • Current and Projected Water Needs in North Orange County • Prior OCWD I OCSD Partnerships in Water Reclamation • Chronological History of the GWR Project • Overview of the GWR Project Project Objectives and Benefits Advanced Water Treatment Facilities (AWTF) Seawater Intrusion Control Barrier GWR Pipeline (Forebay Recharge) OHS Permitting • Final Design Status Report AWTF o Design Features o Perforrl)ance Criteria I Product Water Quality o Equipment Pre-selection (MF and UV) o Process Control System (PCS) Barrier Facilities o Well Siting Issues o Property Acquisition Recharge Facilities o GWR Pipeline o Recharge Basins • Summary of Grants· and Loans • · Summary ·of Project Alternatives -1 - -z - aUON (S)NOl.L:l'1 auvos .LNV A313H l:IOIHd 1euoriewJO~u1 NOl.L '1CN3IJ\lll\IO:l31:1 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: August 21, 2002 TO: Boards of Directors FROM: Virginia Grebbien Blake Anderson Staff Contact: Ron Wildermuth, Lisa Murphy Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants Program/Line Item Nci: 501-4030-600.70-01 Cost Estimate: N/A General Counsel Approval: N/ A Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes SUBJECT: PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STATUS SUMMARY A presentation will be made at the meeting summarizing the Status of the GWR System Public Information and Education (PIE) Program. The presentation will cover the following topics: • Pl E Program Goals and Objectives • Summary of Previous Activities • Summary of Current Activities • Proposed Advertising Program RECOMMENDATION Informational PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S) None -1 - AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: August 21, 2002 TO: Boards of Directors FROM: Virginia Grebbien Blake Anderson Staff Contact: Bill Everest SUBJECT: PROJECT COST UPDATE SUMMARY Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01 Cost Estimate: N/A General Counsel Approval: N/ A Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes The current project capital and O&M cost estimates will be delineated in a presentation at the meeting. The presentation will include the following: • Chronological Summary of Project Cost Estimates. • Capital Cost Components • Annual O&M Cost Components • Additional Costs since December 2000 • Reasons for Additional Costs • Cost Containment Program • OCWD I OCSD Cost Allocation of Project Components • Current Project Budget Capital Costs Annual O&M Costs RECOMMENDATION lnformafional PRIOR· RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S) None -1 - AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: August 21, 2002 TO: Boards of Directors FROM: Virginia Grebbien Blake Anderson Staff Contact: Mike Markus SUBJECT: PROJECT SCHEDULE UPDATE SUMMARY Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01 Cost Estimate: N/A General Counsel Approval: N/A Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes The current project schedule and issues will be described in a presentation at the meeting. The presentation will include the following: • Original Project Schedule • Current Schedule Options Individual Contracts Combined Contracts {Repackaging) -Advantages of Combined Contracts Option • Current Project Schedule Early-start Milestones Completion Milestones RECOMMENDATION Informational PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S) None-··· -1 - • f • .. AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: August 21 , 2002 TO: Boards of Directors FROM: Virginia Grebbien Blake Anderson Staff Contact: Virginia Grebbien Blake Anderson Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants Program/Line Item No.: 501-4030-600.70-01 Cost Estimate: N/A General Counsel Approval: N/A Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes SUBJECT: STATUS OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT SUMMARY The status of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (Agreement) will be discussed at the meeting. Topics will include: • History of Agreement Development • Progress In Resolution of Outstanding Issues • Schedule For Resolution of Remaining Issues RECOMMENDATION Informational PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S) None -1 - We don't th ink about how many everyday things we use water for. But the fact is we use a lot, so much so that it's putting a heavy burden on our water supply. And if it continues, experts predict we could be facing water shortages in the future. To help ensure that we and ou r children have enough water in the future , the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District are proposing a solution - the Groundwater Replen ishment System . Using the same technology as bottled water, It's a sophisticated way of safely converting highly-treated sewer water to a renewable, purified water sour ce. The Groundwater Replen ishment System will create a safe, renewable , new, high -quality water source we can tap for years to come . A Groundwater ~ Replenishment System P.O. Bo x 83 00 , Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8300 (714) 378-3333 www.gwrsystem.com Groundwater Replenishment System Endorsement List Date Aw~ulture-~ ·~-, ...... ~ ....... --""-"--' ....... Orange County Farm Bureau October 1 , 1999 j Business .w· ~ ._ .... ...,_~.;;;..:~= ~:~'f -:f .. ~Date-' •. ~ ............ _......,,,_w;.-._ Baywood Development Group Business Industry Association, Orange County Chapter Centex Homes Downtown Santa Ana Business Association Hall & Foreman, Inc. Hearthside Homes John Laing Homes Orange County Business Council Orange County Tax payers Association Rainbow Disposal Ramirez International R.J . Medrano & Associates Singapore American Business Association of Southern California The Robert Mayer Corporation Trammell Crow Company William Lyon Homes, Inc. WNC & Associates ~.hambers of Commerc~~ . _ • Greater Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Brea Chamber of Commerce Costa Mesa Chamber of Commerce Fullerton Chamber of Commerce Garden Grove Chamber of Commerce Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Irvine Chamber of Commerce Los Alamitos Chamber of Commerce Newport Harbor Chamber of Commerce Orange Chamber of Commerce Placentia Chamber of Commerce Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce Stanton Chamber of Commerce Tustin Chamber of Commerce Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce West Orange County Legislative Committee (Coalition of Cypress, La Palma, & Los Alamitos area Chambers of Commerce) Yorba Linda Chamber of Commerce Cities City of Anaheim City of Beverly Hills City of Brea City of Buena Park City of Burbank City of Costa Mesa City of Cypress City of Fountain Valley City of Fu ll erton City of Huntington Beach City of Irvine June 11 , 2002 June 13, 2002 June 12, 2002 June 19, 2002 February 10, 2000 June 12, 2002 June 13, 2002 January 21, 1998 November 30, 1998 April 1 , 1999 May 21, 2002 April 8, 2002 July 19, 2002 January 15, 2001 December 11 , 1998 June 12, 2002 June 12, 2002 October 5, 1998 March 2, 2000 March 7, 2000 February 9, 2000 June 9, 1998 July 8 , 1998 October 11 , 1999 April 6, 2000 September 29, 1999 September 28, 1999 September 21, 1999 October 9, 2001 May 12, 2000 March 15, 2000 May 18, 1998 July 13, 2000 May 10, 2000 Date March 27, 2001 September 20, 2001 September 27, 1999 November 28, 2000 August8,2001 January 3, 2000 October 25, 1999 September 7, 1999 October 19, 1999 March 15, 1999 October 26, 1999 8/14/02 Groundwater Replenishment System Endorsement List City of La Habra City of La Palma City of Los Alamitos City of Newport Beach City of Placentia City of San Fern ando City of Santa Ana City of Santa Monica City of Seal Beach City of Stanton City of Torrance City of Tustin City of Villa Park City of Westminster !c§'mm u~i!Y Ofga'rii~ations '. ..ll%' i :;-· Anaheim Evening Lions Club Anaheim High 12 Anaheim Optimists Brea Noon Lions Club Brea Republican Women, Federated Costa Mesa-Orange Coast Breakfast Lions Club Fountain Valley Woman's Club Fullerton Host Lions Club Garden Grove Evening Kiwanis Garden Grove Historical Society Garden Grove Republican Women Federated Hispanic Business Women Association Huntington View Garden Club Izaak Walton League Kansas Clu b/Leisure World , Seal Beach Kiwanis C lub of Cypress Lea gue of Women Voters of Orange County Los Amigos of Orange County Newport Harbor Exchange Club Orange Empire Sertoma Retired Oil Men's Club Rotary Club of Fullerton Soroptimist of Buena Park Stanton Lions Club Tustin Area Republican Women Orange County Board of Supervisors Enviro·nmental Blue Planet Foundation Dr. Jack Skinner Groundwater Foundation Mono Lake Committee Orange Coast Watch Orange County Coastkeeper Sierra Club, Orange County Sisters of St. Joseph/Orange, Honoring Women August 16, 1999 October 5, 1999 October 11 , 1999 August23, 1999 September 7, 1999 November 19, 2001 January 16, 2001 September 27, 2001 November 22, 1999 September 14, 1999 August8,2001 October 18, 1999 August24, 1999 July 27, 1999 October 1 , 1999 March 7, 2000 January 31 , 2000 January 18, 2002 May 30, 2001 September 7, 2000 December 5, 2001 March 4, 2001 October 25, 2001 June 29, 2000 November 3, 2001 April 5, 2002 June 9, 2002 September 22, 2001 October 4, 1999 August 19, 1999 March 26, 1999 October 6, 2001 April 27, 2000 July 29, 2002 March 15, 2000 February 3, 1999 May 3, 2000 November 17, 2001 November 30, 2001 September 1, 1999 October 19, 1998 December 24, 2001 March 22, 2001 January 14, 2002 November 16, 1999 December 13, 2000 8/14/02 Groundwater Replenishment System Endorsement List and Creation (environmental group) Surfrider Found ation of Huntington Beach I LB Chapter January 22, 1998 8/1 4/02 :§i?~rnm~']~ J~-~: :, ,, ... :~... :·. · · ~--~ .J:1[J\ fltlif!'}·; :~.]! Qater}. : ;JFJ: S: :1!32!~:!;; :Z::l;:t Assemblyman Bill Campbell July 16, 2002 Assemblyman John Campbell September 17, 2001 Assemblyman Lou Correa March 11, 2002 Congressman Christopher Cox May 21, 2002 Assemblywoman Lynn Daucher June 27, 2002 Senator Dianne Feinstein October 9, 1996 Assemblyman Tom Harman Ma rc h 21, 2002 State Senator Ross Johnson April 3, 2002 Former Congressman Ron Packard Congressman Edward R. Royce Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez [[~4Jih~c ien~.~nqf r;. µ,,ca iqJJ 5?i';' Anaheim Memorial Medical Center Anaheim Union High School District Chapman Unive rsi ty, Department of Physica l Sciences Discovery Science Center Fountain Valley Historical Society Fountain Valley School District Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Huntington Beach City School District National Water Research Institute Newport Bay Hospital North Orange County United Teachers Orange County City Engineer's Association Santa Ana Unified School District May 23, 2002 April 6, 2000 Ju ly 30, 2002 April 18, 2002 January 3, 2002 March 5, 2002 May 20, 2002 December 7, 2001 May 3, 2002 April 16, 2002 February 11, 2002 February 21, 2002 November 21 , 2001 December 15, 1999 May 31, 2002 Savanna School District February 12, 2002 Society of Women Engineers October 3, 2000 waier "' g~ncies ana ')\sSbciat ffins~~·7'~~~~1ti'§~l!'r-l~:'ti'irn1ol'Ea::i·te~'":-~,,-~~~m~ American Water Works Association (AWWA) July 27, 1998 American Water Works Association/Cal-Nev Section (AWWA) June 6, 1998 California-American Water Company October 10, 2001 California Association of Sanitation Agencies May 13, 2002 California Water Environment Association July 3, 2002 Central Basin Municipal Water District October 16 , 2001 Compton Municipal Services Water Department February 6, 2002 Costa Mesa Sanitary District September 17, 2000 East Orange County Water District November 8, 1999 Eastern Municipal Water District October 17, 2001 Foothill Municipal Water District August 22, 2001 Glendale Water & Power October 17, 2001 Inland Empire Utilities Agency August 13, 2001 Las Virgenes Municipal Water District August 23, 2001 Long Beach Water Department September 1 O, 2001 Los Angeles Dep artme nt of Water and Power {LADWP) August 10, 2001 Mesa Consolidated Water District October 14, 1999 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California January 9 , 2002 Moulton Niguel Water District March 19, 2001 Municipal Water District of Orange County September 2 , 1998 Orange County Sanitation District Groundwater Replenishment System Endorsement List Orange County Water District March 15, 2000 Pasadena Water and Power April 22, 2002 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority December 12, 2000 Serrano Water District December 9, 1998 Southern Cal ifornia Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works June 10, 1999 Southern Ca lifornia Water Alliance June 10, 1998 Southern California Water Committee December 18, 1998 Southern California Water Company December 12, 2001 Three Valleys Municipal Water District September 5, 2001 Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District August 16, 2001 West Basin Municipal Water District October 16, 2001 Western Municipal Water District September 19, 2001 Yorba Linda Water District January 26, 2001 ;Q.thers *' ~ ................. h~ .. ~.~.~t,,,_.....,.......~ ...... ~.,....,,-... ....... ..-.~.....,.........,,,..,...__,D~a-t-~-2..;....----_....,._.,........,,__, Anaheim Police Officers Political Action Committee July 17 , 2002 Anaheim Resort RV Park February 12, 2002 Cabrillo Mobile Home Park March 15, 2002 DoubleTree Hotel of Anaheim/Orange County March 1, 2002 Friendly Village Mobile Home Park April 16, 2002 Huntington Harbour Mobile Estates April 22, 2002 Island View Mobile Home Park March 6 , 2002 La Lampara Mobile Home Estates March 4, 2002 Orange County Fire Chiefs Association March 26, 2002 Quiet Village Mobile Home Park March 14, 2002 Tradewinds Mobile Home Park April 10 , 2002 8/14/02 W;;)lSAS lU;;)W~S[U;;)!dd~ R .J ;;)lBMpu no.J 8 ·Jof aw 061e eJed opepuo~ 1ap opef ueJeuv 6U!lSJ!lll le aua!A a1ua6 e1 { ;,---' ~: .. , .. ,., ... . •' . . \ ' ' . . .. . ~ . ........... ..,. ~ ~!'stepSto C~ean, pure water. ,A .. ;~~s pasos alJ _gua limpi~P.u.ra.6 Pure, safe water has always been the primary focus of the Orange County Water District (OCWD). It's also the goal with the GV\JR System. Medical, scientific and environmental experts agree that water produced by the system will be the safest, most reliable new source of water available . Here 's a look at how the purification process works: Highly treated sewer water is delivered to a new treatmen t plant at OCWD. Next, water undergoes advanced water purification processes, including microfiltration , reverse osmosi s and ultraviolet light with hydrogen pero xide treatm ent. Quality is continuously monitored and checked through each step of the treatm ent proces s. The result is clean, purified water -similar in quality to bottled water -that me ets all stat e and federal drinking water stand ards . Finally, it's Mother Nature's turn. Newly purified water seeps into the ground , li ke rain , and blends with existing groundwat er. By 2006, the GWR System is expected to produce enough water to supply 140,000 Orange County families -that makes it a pure solution to our f uture water needs. La salud publica y la segu ridad han sido siempre el foco primario clel OCSD y OCVVD. lt.s iguales con el sistema del relleno de la agua subterranea. Los expertos medicos, cientfficos y arnbientales convienen que el GWRS es el mas seguro , la mayorf a de la nueva fuente confiable de una calidad mejor del agua available.and que el agua en botella. Como el proceso de la purificaci6n trabaja: Tratado altamente las aguas res iduales son refin adas por OCS D mas alla de los estandares de l ag ua potab le. lt.s tot alm ente usab le a este punto .. Despues, en el OCWD, el agua experimenta otro proceso ava nza do de la purificaci6n que incl uya la microf il trac i6n y lu z reversa de l osmos is y ultrav ioleta. La ca li dad se supervisa y comprob6 continu ame nte cada se is min utos. Ahora, vuelta de la madre Nature.s de it.s,como el agu a purifi cada co nsigue bombeada en la tier ra para el fina l cam ine . el procedi miento de fi lt rado nat ural. Como la lluvia,el ag ua nuevamen te purificada fil tra en la ti erra y mezcla con la ag ua subterra nea, donde perm anece por hasta 5 aii os antes de ser utiliz ado. Antes de 2006, se espera que el GWRS produzca bastante agua para proveer 140.000 familias anaranjadas del condado. Que marcas el que la soluci6n clara a nuestra agua futura necesita. > tec n o l o~pas mlls av anzadas de la ·ifi ca cion ~a util zan. inc uy end o los >mos fabr cc1 ntvs clc le s metodos USO de! ZdnlO " dP IO! alime nt os ·a ni ncos d•J fr 1ta cl e ·11 tra r y de ·ifica r su~ I" 1du· tos ce sidades del fu rnro de a re union. meta es ::i.t 1 r a isrr:ur< se de que stant e 1 : I nr, 1 r iri f .:ada esta . pon ible 1.w1 e:st 1 Q"l'en ci6n. y el 1uient e Aas de un a bL ;·11 co sa :1 nuevo sist· .e1 i i c, 1tidad del 1gua we.I I 11 , · :i01 • n "iorara la :alidad de r 1 • • • nt · ra " la agua ;ubterranea Cada afio, los residentes Orange County utilizan mas y mas ag ua . Mucha de el se comp ra de otras ciudades o estados. Esta agua del imported. puede ser muy costosa, y durante algunas estac iones , diffcile s de conseguir. Si la sequfa golpea o sale n estas fuentes, nosotros. y las generaciones que siguen. hara fre nt e a una crisis seria del agua. Una soluci6n clara. Que porque el districto anaranjado del agua del condado (OCWD) y el distr icto anaranjado del saneamiento del condado (OCSD) estan propon iendo una nueva fuente de agua local llamada el sistema del relleno de la agua subterranea (GWRS) . Its que una manera innovadora de rellenar el subterraneo (el llenar) provee y de crear un recurso seguro, confiable podemos golpear ligeramen te por anos para venir. El GWRS incluira una tuberfa nueva, un equipo de bombeo y una facilidad de gran capacidad del tratamiento. Producira el agua usable , de alta calidad por millones de purificaci6n de galones de aguas residuales que con sigan actualmente enviados al oceano. Tan seguro como el agua en botella . El agua de GWRS es tan segura justo como agua en botella. En hecho, utiliza algunos de las mismos metodos de la purifi cac i6n usados por las companfas en botella del agua. Eso significa you .II nunca tiene que preocupa rse de seguridad, de calidad o de pureza . Justo como el agua que usted ahora cons igue, agua de GWRS resolvera todo el local , estado y estandares federales. Endosado po r los expertos. GWRS ha sido endosado como caja fuerte por los expertos de la salud medica , cientffica y publica a traves del estado. Consiga l os hechos. El crecimiento conti nuado de la poblaci6n pondra ciertamente una tension en las fuentes futuras. Pero con una nueva fuente confiab le tenga gusto de GWRS, cristal anaranjado del agua de County.s podria lleg ar a ser mas lleno que vacfo. Para mas informaci6n, visite www.gw rsystem.com o la llamada (7 14) 378-3333. Eve ry year, Orange County residents use more and more water, much of it im ported from out side t he county. This "imported" water can be very expe nsive , and during some seasons, difficult to get. If drought hits or these sources are reduced, we -and the generations that follow -will face a seri ous water crisis . A clear solution. That's why the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) are proposing a new lo cal water source called the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System. It's an innovative way of refilling undergrou nd water supplies and creating a safe, reliable resource we can tap into for generations to come. The GWR System will include a ne w pipeline, pumping equipment and a high-tech treatment facility. It will produce usable, high-quality water by purifying millions of gallons of sewer water that 's currently sent to the ocean . As safe as bottled water. GWR System water is just as safe as bottled water. In fact , it us es some of the same purification methods used by bottled water companies . That me ans you 'll never have to worry about safety, quality or purity. Just like the water you get now, GWR System water will meet all state and federal standards. Endorsed by the experts. The GWR System has been endorsed as safe by medical , scientific and publ ic health experts throughout the state . Get the facts. Planned reductions in imported water supplies will certainly put a strain on future supplies. But with a reliable new source like the GWR System , Orange County's wa ter glass could become more full than empty. For more information , visi t www.gwrsystem.com or call (7 14) 378-3333. The most advanced puri ficatio technolog ies are used, in cludi ng th same met hods makers of fruit jui c and baby food use to fil t er and puri1 their products . Meeting future needs. The goal is to he lp ensur e 'hat enoug l clean, pu rifi ed wa ter is av ar'ab le for thi! generation -and the nex t. More of a good th ing. The ne w system wi ll increas· the quantity of water we'll have available c. d improve the quality of our entire ground1·: ·er supp ly. Groundwater Replenishment System Joint Board Workshop Project Review August 21, 2002 . ~ Groundwater ~ Replenishment System m· m--·-~-~~~~ A Agenda ~ A. Project Status Report B. Public Information & Education Program C. Project Cost Update D. Project Schedule Update E. Status of Joint Powers Agreement Gr.1Jnd-~\'-ater H~1~~i~hrrern ~i$~???r; 812112002 1 812112002 -'I Project Status Report { ) Groundwater ~ Replen ishment System --. ..--.. -----J Water Needs ~-~ Groundwater V Replenishmen t System 1 2 18 Million Residents Depends on Three Import Projects for 60% of all Demand :_., ... ·.:: .. a:' .. Where Does Orange County Get its Water? ..... · -~··.·.· -. ,,.. r .,I' ' .. ~ .... --~ • Groundwater (OCWD) provides 75% of the water used in North and Central Orange County Groundwater basin is a natural storage, filter and piping system Holds 3-10 trillion gallons of water Diamond Valley Lake holds less than 0.3 trillion gallons (>$2 Billion) Groundwater is 1/3 the cost of imported water • Imported Water (Metropolitan Water District) is water from Northern California and the Colorado River 25% of the water used in North and Central Orange County 90% of the water used in South Orange County 812112002 3 .:::? ~ ;:::: ~ ;::: :::;. Orange County Needs More Water in the Future ~ p / otent1al water conservation .... 200 <U ~ 180 / lii 160 a. 4Cii 140 Cll u. 120 ~ ~ 100 0 80 {l 60 c: :Jl 40 :J 0 20 .r:: I-0 y / Year 2020 /Additional water required yearly / Phase 3 I Phase 2 Phase 1 GWR System Where Do OCWD and South f ~ Orange County Get Water? ~ ---··- MWD Direct OCWD: 450 MGD South County: 135 MGD 812112002 4 -' A~ Sanitation Needs ~ ~ v •Continue 30-year water reclamation commitment •Defer the need for a new ocean outfall •Reduce ocean discharge Grrii ,";Y~Y{1!~ r--_-;v-"'~"n'f• .• s,~· ~ rr" OCWD and OCSD are Partners in Water Reclamation OCSD -Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Disposal OCWD -Manage and Protect the Orange County Groundwater Basin Firs~ Partnership in 1972 for Wastewater Reclamation Source Control OCSD OCWD Reuse f~;AflJ'o·\·(Jtf'r :<J·:~~rru-r :;..~n) 812112002 5 Water Factory 21 Since 1975 Water Factory 21 has: ~-~~dii.2~~~~ • Prevented seawater intrusion into the Groundwater Basin • Consistently met all State and Federal Drinking Water Standards • Produced over 33 billion gallons of water that blends with existing groundwater :•1\ ;-~!'.\~ttt• r" ... ~~ .. ..,.~ .... ~~\""T" t ~ Green Acres Project ~ ~ ~ • OCWD built 7.5 mgd facility for coastal irrigation industrial use -OCSD supplies secondary wastewater • Operation began in 1991 \;"1J...:-~.'.O~r Fi'i~'-"'·~ .. ..-~rr: ~-,..,,. 812 112 002 6 A GWR System History ~ ~ ~ •Feasibility Study completed in March 1995 • Engineer's Report completed in September 1997 • EIR certified in March 1999 • Federal EIS environmental work recorded in August 2000 • Design authorized in March 2001 Project Overview ~ Groundwater ~· ,·.~ ..... ea. \i,f Replenishment System~ .. ~~~'" -~• 812112002 7 A Project Goals and Objectives ~ (!I/I ~ Goals Objectives •Improve groundwater quality Water Supply •Provide a new water supply •Increase reliability and diversity Wastewater •Reduce ocean discharges Management •Defers the need for a new ocean outfall Grr~FY"'.-\<;1t~ The GWR System ~~~.::::·~~~ Also Benefits the Reoion " b • Requires 50% less energy than water imported through the State Water Project (SWP) • Helps MWD meet long-term regional water supply needs • Consistent with the objectives of the CALFED process • Incorporates water reclamation into water resources management • Reduces wastewater discharge to the ocean, . (.;rtJUnav{-ater f~~p(1;~rrcn: ~PJ~.,. 812112002 8 -! ~~ ;:;;, ~ The GWR System Will Produce the Highest Quality Water in the Region 'ii]gff soo-------- 700 -'"------~-----I 600 -1--~-,~~tJil--~"""T""-"-i ::r 500 l> 400-+----4 ·"'"!c'l----4 -~ 300 ._ 200 100 Colorado GWR River System Northern Santa Ana California River High TDS water is above 500 mg/L • Concentration of Total Dissolved Solids in water causes significant consumer costs ••. water heaters, plumbing corrosion, softening, etc. •Average TDS levels will continue to increase without th is project Project Description 812112002 9 ' The GWR System Has Multiple Components Pacific Ocean Advanced ./ Water Treatment Plant Sa ntiago Creek Site Plan/Project Components I~ •-' ==~ T N 812112002 JO Se water Intrusi n Barrier Facilities \_Bmier ipeline Garfield Ave. Yorl<town Ave. Adams Ave. Indianapolis Ave. A State Department of Health ti ~ Services Approval Status ~ • Received updated concept approval letter in August 2002 • Grants concept approval for a 75% recycled water project (25% dilution water) • Specifies a phased approach to 100% recycled water (no dilution water) • Next step is a public hearing in early 2003 812 112002 11 • GWR System Project Implementation Phase COM Scope-Estimated Percent Complete Tht" Juty 200 2 R -m ~ -~ ---~ ~ Task 1: Ptog-am1nd Pt'opct MaiugM"ent I Ta sk2 Teni>Otary M= and Sh Pipno OesOn Seru:n Task 3; Slf:e Pow er l)stnbution Oos9n Sorvx:es : Task" c:.t:tiQOtY 1 O&troitaon Oes:Gn Services liJ Task 5· RJcs and Foul"ldation Pt e ~rnon OelGn Servces ~J:-4!· ; I ; I ' •t.t 't. THk 6: ~uipt1'ent Proseiec~ Oes9n Services ~ ~vt:;Q-.'k· ' ~ Task 7· Advanced Wolter Ttea1 tT11nt Ftcibot ()es9l"I Servces ct'!( O :t . i l T>sk a: Barrier w.• Clrilng Oos9n Sen1icn .... I l. I T.,k 9: Bomer W.lhet d FaeiitiM Design Services 111!"1!' ~~!'!!·f~~·~·~: ~§;iill!iil~ T:>sk 10: S.mor flpelne Oos9n Services • ilil••••'"' Tas k 11 : OHR Flpelne l.1'>1 1 Design Se""' .. l l'.'f : Task 12: GWlF\pelno lhC •Design Servoc.. • • •r ·'~ Task 13· GWRF\pe lno Lh! I Ocs9n Services ~.&S. Tuk u Other Oei ig n Setv.ces t o.t•:. I Task 15. lliddong SeNoces i : Task 16: Eatly SUrtAWTFConotNc"°"ServcM TDSk. 17. A dvancod Water Treattrenl Faciloet Co,..trucoon Sorv c es Taak 18: Barrier Facjt:ies COnstruc:bOn Serven Task 19 Gv.R Flpelne ConstructJOn Se<vcos T~k 20; Su1ttt.r;:1 and ()per at.on and ~.'Q 11 tenance ServCes T~sk 2 1: Trans :acbOnalSystemlntegrabOn Servw:es 1 ~~~~~=~=1~;;;~~~:~~~'·*' Ta1k:22: Busine ss Pli:lft Services '1:1~1 Tas k 23 :0ttle<RoquirodSpoeial Serv~.. '!·'" I : 1 . ~~~--~~ Total Serv.:n (Al Oment Pro)e(ts Open) ~ .l.-:.. ·-! _ _ ~-- GWR System Advanced Water Treatment Flow Diagram 86 mgd Microfiltration (MF) Backwash OCSD Plant 1 i 70 mgd Reverse Osmosis (RO) 70 mgd Ultraviolet Light (AOP) (hydrogen peroxide add e d ) Brine OCSD Outfall i Gv ... t11'J;·;of'' f ~~:·d.J~)IVf't.n! s. .... ".J)Y 812112002 12 OCSD Source Control Enhancements • NOMA and 1,4-Dioxane showed us that source control needed to do more • OCSD is committed to "reinventing source control" • Source control will now include all compounds of concern in drinking water • Expanded monitoring to detect more compounds coupled with better communications with industry will help prevent future problems for GWR System Gn"ll1·1(1 • ...att·f A WTF Process Flow Diagram OC.$0 l'lllnlNo. f P.:~n:.nrr.en~ S.5!\'11'1 ~--""l-ri', : ~:: ~]'."-.:.;_ '= Kra<nntulMUJw . . ltfacllalion symr.. AO Cara!Ggor -==-:..~ L, . r·:_,_~···. 'I()~ :: niws StAUon ROflWt°Tlr."k = 100C$00cw11Qurt./I ._ - San"f:Anla • r.•~lr.wan<ll"~'l- Rlnr 812112002 13 Microfiltration is the Second Step Water + contaminants Backwash to OCSD Porous hollow fibe r MF membrane • • • • . : () Purified Water • Technology brought to the U.S. after WW II • Used in computer, food and pharmaceutical manufacturing • Used to sterilize medicines that can't be heated • Best pre-treatment before reverse osmosis A g 1:-Reverse Osmosis Membrane System ~ a ~ • 70 mgd Reverse Osmosis system • Recovery Rate: 80% -87.7% • 5 mgd per train/15 trains • Flux rate : 12 gfd • Pressure range: 100 psi - 325 psi • Building size: 200 ft x 240 ft , it:J~-.~r'f\(fff f~~)\Y S.'~~l"·~~·: ~,,,.,~ 1'; 812112002 14 UV System (Disinfection & NDMA) • 70 mgd Pressure UV system • Low Pressure/High Output • 150 ppt (influent) -+ 2 ppt (effluent) NOMA Reduction • Manufacturer: Trojan Technologies { ) Product Water Quality ~ • GWR System will produce water that meets all federal and state drinking water standards • Product water will have extremely low leve~s of salts and will require addition of minerals for stabilization •RO in conjunction with UV/hydrogen peroxide is the best combination to remove future contaminants of concern 812112002 15 ~ ~ Process Control System Overview ~ .e; ~ • Process Control System -Servers -Controllers -Instruments ----·--i_ __ ,_ - -Software GWRSystem Pipeline and Barrier g: ~ Gro un dwater ~ Replenishment System ..-...r ... ,,.......,_ • ....,....,.,...~-~-· 812112002 16 812112002 f ~ GWR System Map ~ Santiago Creek Pac ific Ocean Advanced _/ Water Treatment T Plant N G •\I ~j.'\~J!(·1 P ... ·o "· ·-:rn ~,\ ":)..f.::i._vr ter Intrusion B rrier Facilities Barrier ipeline G•rfield Ave. Yorlttown Av e. A dims Indianapolis Ave. 17 812112002 Status of Property Acquisition ~ Injection Well Location Status 1-29 Trailer Park Storage Lot complete 1-30 Faith Lutheran Church OCWD Board approval Parking Lot 1-3 1 Baptist Church Parking Lot JCC, Board Approval 1-3 2 Purchased Lot complete 1-33 Pegasus School yard complete 1-34 Arvellos Park complete 1-35 Nursery complete 1-36 Nurse ry complete G1·"( .... \Oit., f"·n:rn"'..rfl'P 1 ""'"'f' f ..., Easement Locations ~~----_..,....,....,.----~:-~~~~~~~~~----....- 18 A Southeast Barrier 'V • Southeast Barrier will provide MWD water during construction of GWR System •Flow will be reversed once GWR System is in operation and will provide transmission to four wells on the southeast GWR Pipeline • 14 mile pipeline, 60-78 inches in diameter • Sized for ultimate flow • Estimated future mid- basin injection demands • Located in Santa Ana River levee Gri".." ... '":fi:'IO.f'' :!!~n~~~-'T~r: ~.~-:-Dr 812112002 19 3 Pipeline Construction Contracts Unit I Unit II Unit Il l 78inch 72i nch Fountain Valley • Kraemer Basin has high, sustained recharge capacity • Miller Basin will be utilized during Kraemer Basin cleaning operations 66inch 60inch Anaheim G·t), '.r:rot1:c-1 R ~t· ~,l''lf"!'~r ~ .... ,~· • ..,.. 812112 002 20 ~. ..:::; GWR Pipeline Agreements ~~ II • Approved Agreements -County for Santa Ana River right-of-way adjacent to Lacy Jail -River View Golf Course -Orange County Flood Control District • All GWR Pipeline rights-of-way s~cured • Additional Permits ;:s. ... -~ ~ _§ii id? •Fish and Game-1601 Permit • Caltrans -Utility Encroachment • Army Corps of Engineers -404 Permit Gr~,i~uv .. ~itt; R-=nenr.r~rrent S.,-s:c~ • Cities of Fountain Valley, Santa Ana, Anaheim, Orange and Huntington Beach - Design Approvals Gn1..inn-.-\:a:er Rt·~pk:r~Yirr('.n! ~~~~~:·rr 812112002 21 Public Information & Education Program :? ~ Groundwater \j. Rep lenishment Syste m ·---· ....,....... .. ____,_.,_.-.~ .,.....__ '. ~ -, __,._.:, Proven Communication :s a Approach to Public Outreach ~ ~Step Process: Research, Planning , Communication & Evaluation • Initial focus on community leaders is based on two-step theory of public opinion • Outreach provided Project Public Representatives with foundation of strong community leader support for decision to proceed in March 2001 r-::;;:::i ~~ . ~gmlfil1~ E]!adm~~ []~I.fill~~ w~~~ CTI~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~m ~ ~~(:::~;(! ),---~, 812112002 22 A St·•ate'g)' ;:s· ..... ·~·:1=:; I I ;;s, ~ ~~ QJ • Inform community leaders and general public in service area before 2006 when Phase I of project goes on line, so there is no public or political opposition -Be honest, truthful -Be open, be accessible -Use multiple communication channels ~man ~-·~~. ··~··~~ r 'j ~ ~ ~ ~ lUJ7 G;:~ ~·:Q':;\:at{-:w P,:p:r.nr"1n:e:·1t S'/Stt:m Inform the general public and continue to solicit support of key opinion leaders using: •Research • Community/Media Outreach • Government Outreach • Minority Outreach • Advertising • Continued Evaluation G~1.;r;ft;-",ater rblk~~l[sfffr~~rn ~f5:1~rn 812112002 23 A What Does Research Tell Us? ;:;, ~ ~ater is not a concem for OC -need to be proactive and explain need for project Lack of awareness of cutbacks in future imported -Medical, health and water quality experts are credible sources for this project • Need cable TV and direct mail to reach less active community members & build awareness • The more people know about GWRS, the more likely they are to support it • Voters: want reliability & local control don't trust future supplies will pay for more reliability & higher quality water A Community/Media Outreach ~ublic presentations -Approx. 500 presentations in last four years • Adding Spanish section to website • Updating and reorganizing website content • Completed white paper on water quality -Two more white papers coming • Continued outreach via community talks, tours, events, fax and email distribution of information • Continue to brief new reporters and reach out to out- of-area media Gr·JJ'!awa.er f~f~)k:risnrr:\:rii ~iS~l:i~·: 812112002 24 -~ Government Outreach ,, • Expanded efforts to state and federal electeds • Offer personal briefings and tours • New endorsement examples: Congressman Christopher Cox Congressman Ed Royce State Senator Ross Johnson Assemblyman Bill Campbell Assemblyman Lou Correa Assemblywoman Lynn Daucher Assemblyman Tom Harman New Minority Outreach • Briefings & tours for minority leaders • New endorsement examples: Hispanic Business Women Association Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce Gr~) f 1!! ... ~m·.t F~n~"1rrer:t Sr-s:err. President of the Asian Business Association of Orange County President of the Black Chamber of Commerce of Orange County Korean Chamber pending GrottlOWait"' Hepb1isnrr:c:r~ ~i$l??m 812112002 25 ;s· ·~ ,~ End of 2002 & Beginning of 2003· ~ • Establishing Leadership Advisory Council -people we. can call upon to talk to other leaders, primarily business, minority, medical, university, etc. -high-level third-party supporters • Continue face-to-face presentations to key groups, individuals and elected officials • Periodic updates to city councils, including one-on- ones for new council members and offer more study sessions • Focus on universities, hospitals & health organizations • Launch advertising program 1st quarter 2003 Gr~) l'. if!'·~~i!f'! P;f.r~r.::..rurert S:'S::~ • Developed creative concepts for advertising program that includes: -30-second cable TV advertisement -Brochure for mailing insert to all homes in service area _ .. Ethnic newspaper ads • Position project as part of OC's water future • Stream of positive information in marketplace fills informational void before people might hear negative information • Predisposes public to the positive Grr; ... ti='1~Yat'!' fb;ler~shrrcm )t~"J~ff: 812112002 26 A Success Factors ;; . . .:::; ~ /f \QJ~ • We have been proactive with media • Boards of 2 agencies are very protective of the public health • We have successful history of water reuse in OC • We have "backup" natural filtration process and a groundwater basin for equitable distribution • Recharged Santa Ana River flows with treated wastewater and research shows that it provides safe, healthy water • GWR System is the responsible thing to do .A Evaluation To Date " • No active opposition t:::tf~;u: .. ~,t~ fa:p~:;;~rr·~·it S,,~~;. ... rr • Survey research indicates voters support project benefits • Public opinion is moving in the right direction -Over 150 community groups & businesses .. actively support project in writing • Building strong political support • Leadership outreach effective across all areas, business, environmental, minorities, etc. • Over 50 balanced media reports Grc;Jfl{';;\:att"' f~i~iis:1rnc:nt :j.~~~l..'rr 812112002 27 Project Cost Update ~ Groundwater tf' Replenishment System~~~~~~ • A Look at the O&M Costs ;::.· ~ ~,, --P O&M is a major cost component • Able to reduce O&M with the result that costs are lower despite increase in capital costs Year December 2000 November 2001 June 2002 August2002 O&M ($M/yrl 21.2 22.0 23.0 22.0 812112002 28 • Unit Cost Components ~ Capital Recovery Annual O&M $/M Impact $.80/af $14/af ~ A Look at the Project Cost ~ ~ kV Year Capital SM Unit $/af December 2000 352 November 2001 368 June 2002 402 August2002 427 420 424 447 437 Grr...a: .• tX'i;\:a!f" ~i~.:ri~;rrcnr 3-,~::crr 812112002 29 • Annual O&M Cost Breakdown ($Mlyr) Item ~,',"'·",'~ ~-.A ~ Power Contract Maintenance Chemicals Plant Refurbishment Membrane Replacement UV Lamp Replacement Compliance Monitoring O&M Staff Total Chemicals (H 20 2 dose} Staff Salary Overhead Total Dec'OO June'02 7.0 6.6 0.2 0.4 3.6 5.2 2.6 2.6 3.0 2.8 0.4 0.2 1.0 1.5 3.4 3.6 21.2 23.0 $0.5 M/yr $0.5 M/yr $1.0 M/yr Aug •02 6.6 0.4 4.7 2.6 2.8 0.2 1.5 3.1 22.0 Gfw :: id':t.;at!·., P\1::r~:t>~rr~r1t. Sl!tr:~rr. Gn 1t..;'1nwatr:r f~~pk:r1i~'lrr;cr~ ~~1·~~1~~p: 812112002 30 • Capital Cost Breakdown ($M) ~ -~ ~ Construction: Plant Barrier GWR Pipeline OCIP Replacement Wells Subtotal Eng/Legal/Admin (ELA) Total Capital Cost Dec 2000 239 10 67 -0- -0- 316 36 352 Aug 2002 275 14 71 6 5 371 56 427 c~:)_i: 1;.!';:"~~itt., V;t_T-~nr;.'"'uTr?it S.,~:c·rr: • Additional Canital Costs 1$/M.l ~ ~ r ,. / ~lated Construction Cost to June '02 15.8 Anaheim/SCWC Wells 4.9 Contract Administration 1.2 Construction Period Services 3.4 Engineering Services 15.6 Public' Information & Education 2.6 Legal/Real Estate/ Easements (0.4) Scope Changes During Design 6.9 Subtotal Dec '00 -June '02 50.0 Gr(FJ:"'irtNaH~' f~~)~~niS:1rrt:nt S.;~:::t~m 812112002 31 ~ Additional Capital Costs ($/M) ~·:,~~·~~ /cont) ;:; ~ ,. ~rkshops Cost Containment 4 (5) AWTF 50% Estimate 26 Subtotal June -Aug '02 25 M ----- Total 75 M Gr!''r :·1tr.vnt!1 ~:-~:r:t~!::-S1!mer1t ~!err' A ~;~~:;: z:::;: Cost Increases - ~ ~ ~FSystem -Additional Capacity (86 mgd) -Expanded Structure -Precise Electrical Costs • RO System -Additional Equipment (85% recovery) -Lime Facilities • UV /Peroxide System • I & C System • Electrical -Premium Efficiency Motors &r~'U:1ti~·rcner f~,ltr1~rncrn ~t~:tl:tv 812112002 32 ~ GWR System Has Received Significant ~. :.~.,A~~ Grant & Loan $$ ~ .:;;: ~ ~ ,,... Grants -EPA -USBR -SAWPA -SWRCB -DWR Total Grants SRF Loans 0.5 20.0 37.0 5.0 30.0 $92.5 $145.0 ~ Phase, 1 Cost Components ~s~,··~~*~ I' Auo 02~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ '/ ~ ~ ,.,. • Capital Cost = $427 M (a) • O&M Cost • Unit Cost -Capital Recovery -O&M = $ 22 M/yr = $437/af = $134/af = $303/af Gr~); ~~1{tt1V<t!·.1 F~'fl::w-nrrrr ;! Sis:,·m (a) Does not include projected staff costs ($SM) & escalation ($24M) Gn i.;r;n-.. .,·att'' f~:i)c~1~snrr1..::n: ~~~·:-~:1~r 812112002 33 Summary of the Project Cost Year Capital SM December 2000 November 2001 June 2002 August2002 Construction Management Contract Administration Public Education 352 368 402 427 Legal I Real Estate I Easements ELA Contingency Unit $/af 420 424 447 437 .iM 35.6 14.0 0.5 3.7 1.1 1:l. Total 56 812112002 34 Project Schedule Update • A Look at the Project Schedule ~A -• Original Schedule •Situation Today ... Options • Recommended Option Grr.J .. 1.'1C-:;"1oter Rt,i"'r:ishrr~rrr S-1·~7.!:tr· 812112002 35 t ~ GWR System Map ~ .:::; ~ Pacific Ocean Advanced Water Treatment Plant Santiago Cree k ('\ Original Project Schedule ~ ~ ~ • 10 Construction Contracts -A fast-track approach • Procure MF and UV in early 2002, and complete design AWTF by January 2003 • Begin early-start contracts at AWTF in May 2002 • Start AWTF construction in July 2003, operational by Dec. 2005, and complete by March 2006 T N G~1 .... /r·..-·.-att" PJ1;\:-:·:•/irrx r: r~.\:;··~~y 812112002 36 812112002 -Da-:-:-~- 1'9•~· .~ ~~ ---. ·--i:~ ----- - _ _, :GWU -1Aal111 Grourdwater Replenishment System l--=0oie-.,...----R ____ ___,!,.._..,--..., -AePIMd----0. QI.JUI.II' F-Dolo 1QIAAROI Dmllolo Q2JUl.ll' C Primavera Systems, Inc 37 • Situation Today \J • Certain Activities have impacted schedule, e.g. -UV approval -4 months -Selection of architect, structural and electrical engineers -3.5 months -Negotiations with MF supplier -5 months -Negotiations with SCE -5 months -Finalizing Operating Agreement • Bottom Line: Lost opportunity for early·-start contracts at AWTF • Constraint: SWRCB SRF grant requires project NTP by December 2002 ~~,!~;~;.~~~nt s,~-~~ .4 Review oif Ontions ~· ~ r '22' • Our Goal: Minimize delay and it's impacts • A few options studied-two options discussed here: -Individual Contracts -Combined Contracts Gn1J~i:"';":·.-at~ fb;k:nistirn-crn ~~~·~-:-~1~r): 812112002 38 A Individual-Contracts Ontion ;:::, ~ ..r ~-~ %[J • 10 construction contracts • Start Southeast Barrier Contract approval process in August 2002, to meet the SRF grant condition • Start AWTF in October 2003 and complete by Feb. 2007 • Operational by Nov. 2006, one year later than the original schedule A~ 1%) : 120 I COnstrudlon 180 I Construdion 240 Constnlc:bOn 300 I construdlon 420 I ConSINcllon 490 I Construcllon 550 Construction 610 I Construdion 300 Construction 812112002 39 A Combined-Contracts Option ~ a:li <& • 7 construction contracts • Combining Temp MF and Site Power • Combining Site Demo and Piles & Foundations with AWTF • Start Site Power & Temp MF Contract approval process in October 2002 • Start AWTF in June 2003 and complete by Feb. 2007 • Operational by Nov 2006, one year later than the original schedule ---- • .. ==:& l .. G;~\:.irid'N<i~·.f Ptpffnr"=rr.ent ~-s~~-rr: 812112002 40 812112002 ~ I ~ -· I I -· I -I -ActMly II 1111111111111 I I I 11111111111111111Ill11111 ID i DHcrtpllcln ' I . 10 jFinalo.Ugn 20 lllclding 1 or.· 30 JCC ~u I r : ~ ~ : 40 OCWO Board1Aw11d ~!IN~ ~ 50 NolatoP-.t IU , > 60 Constnidion -. 250 !Final o.Ugn ~ .. : 260 BiddSlg ~~ 3 270 JCC 1!~3 280 OCWD BoardlA-rd , ~· p ~= 285 OCSO l!oardlA-rd ll 290 Notice to Proceed 300 Conll!vetion 302 AWTF Operational . :n1 VM 304 Project Complete : .. . ; 370 Final Design 380 Bidding :I U3 390 JCC 1 I 400 OCV4> Board/Award 1~ J~~ 410 Notiee to Proceed 420 Construction -. " -l • ...-...-.. -· . . . 425 Perm!lling 430 Fin•lo.lign ~n· , 440 Bidding 0 ~l: 450 JCC 110!•0 ~ OCV«>a-d/~ l"U ~ I -· I ActM!yi Ac1lvlty I I II Ill I lltl I I ti• I I I ID I Dnatpao., ... 470 iOCSO Board/Award II I llllBu~1 ~. I I olillt 480 Notice to Proceed II 490 Construction II . . ,. 495 Pennltl!ng ~ 500 Final Oeslan ~~i:ic 510 Bidding ~HU 3 .~~P~U 520 JCC 111~H 530 OCV4> BoltdlAward 11 J 532 ocso BoerdlAward ti~' 3 540 Notice to Proceed 211U1U 1 'l~X 550 Construction Z II:~ 0 -· -n ~ .. . . . 555 Permlting 2 580 Final OHlgn ~i:-~1 570 Bldd!na 580 JCC ~ 3 590 OCV4> BoardlAward 1 fB 592 OCSO Board/Award l'I fD;• 800 Notice lo Proceed 810 Construc:licn •.-+-• . --,,... ........ .. ...... : .. 310 jFlnal OHign 320 Bidding 331) JCC ... ~ :10 ~ 340 OCV4> Boanl/A-rd I) o~ 350 Notice to Proc:eed ~ )1 < r.ii 1 " 'l 380 Construc:bon 41 .A Combined-Contracts Option ~ Advantages/Disadvantages ~- Advantages • Fewer contracts, better coordination • Potential cost savings due to economy of scale • Eliminates Owner's risk for assignment of contracts • Reduces Owner's risk of ripple delay impacts Disadvantages • Additional time and cost for repackaging • Adopt the Combined-Contracts Option • Proceed with advertisement of the Southeast Barrier Contract in August 2002 • Proceed with advertisement of the Site Power /Temp MF Contract in October 2002, subject to execution of Joint Agreement f.::::2 l ch:~_,,-_,> ·'h 0rJJ:1nwater ~~>k:r1~mcr11 S:t.:.ti.'l"rt 812112002 42