Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-06-26 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT June 19, 2002 pane, NOTICE OF MEETING (7141962-2411 (714)91 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Yexnravie""n' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Dialling c44,ess: Foun[eein Vel1y'G4 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 2002 — 6:30 P.M. 92728-8127 sce"i addrees: 108"Ellis Avenue F°"n`amvalley, CA DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 92708-7018 10844 Ellis Avenue Wineer Fountain Valley, California 92708 Agencies • The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Dml.a District will be held at the above location, time and date. Ana.e,m area p Buena PerkCpprass V �/ Faunwln Way iii FVllerro careenase Bo rd Secr ry Huntington seearh b ne La He6ra e Palma Las Alem,w Newport Beach o-ange Placentia Tentatively- Scheduled Upcoming Meetings San a Ana Seal Be., Swnwn Tustin villa Perk %raa ❑nee JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT County of orange SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday, July 8, 2002 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD Sanitary Districts FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday,July 10,2002 at 5:00 p.m. cosw Mesa STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday,July 17, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. Miewey De, wear Districts Irvine Rai r� To maintain world class Ieade,.h m wastewater and water resource managemenn. b 4? BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting July *July 17, 2002 August August 28, 2002 September September 25, 2002 October October 23, 2002 November November 20 2002 December •December 18, 2002 January January 22, 2003 February February 26, 2003 March March 26, 2003 April April 23, 2003 May May 28, 2003 June June 25, 2003 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month Wwp.d1MadMIn\Bs%gendaU0D2 Meeting NoUwMMN6.2.doc BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken,Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: BALLOT \For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: XShirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. d BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: 74 Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch at District Other. BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken,Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: (/ Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. 4U,4 BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: XShirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. �c [ CVI BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim XBrian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District _ Other. BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim /=Y Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: tj BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: IrvVv BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim kBrian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. ?�'� wit'l- BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: Shirley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other: BALLOT For the position of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District for Fiscal Year 2002-03: irley McCracken, Anaheim Brian Brady, Irvine Ranch Water District Other. v / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOQRD OF DIRRIEC ORS / WI persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ` 2C O Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 00 d RC)rAd7 HOME ADDRESS: I U 2p May- Rgg, (number/street) S• 9 • y � �G (city/zipc code) -- TELEPHONE: " 2 Lf 3O 2- REPRESENTING. / (self/name of rganization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'All persons✓wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. AS determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: CG 26Io z AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . 1\\1 ``. . . .�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) Veit^ l`P��erf'l4^h HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) Cat AeJ4 (A (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (/ (� Z (self/naS eoforganization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.. DATE: -oe 1t"L P AGENDA ITEM NO. I yt'f "e' . . . . . . . , . .rye._—.-�i,.�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) , . 11•"'^—t HOME ADDRESS: W (number/street) 0 9.s{b, (city/zz(ipQCo ) I-I_ TELEPHONE: ` `l +11-��`('`(� REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) 3 / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS V 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. / 7 DATE: _�- AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . .Q.. . . . . . . .L/ D. . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) ��'P(�ti iGV11IT/�i"yt p HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code)) Q TELEPHONE: / ( — 3-7 7 -y 0 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) '7 � REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) rr ' TELEPHONE: Lc� REPRESENTING: tlCtrv�.��- '�fJ (self/name of organization) S � ✓ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: - Z� _ _2 AGENDA ITEM NO. t"/ YLO=j NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: / (self/name of organization) 10 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to //the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: lf� L� ' AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) S�e A(a / 2 Imo/ HOME ADDRESS: d (number/street) ^ �� C nV-0 \A '1� c� (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ,,, -,�`�� REPRESENTING: 77CS�GG'lL6„: DOZSSZ (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (/ All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. AS determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 4'� '©Z AGENDAITEMNO. NAME: (please print) 'T9t}4) V 6k 040Q; Levy— HOME ADDRESS: 222-( (number/street) A/e-u� a� CGg (city/zipgcode)TELEPHONE: /�7 /y+y— S fIpw —6,DL6 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G:\ p.dfaadminOSTORMS\Request to Speak.doc / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS L/ All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: �b 166-r (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: __,/) REPRESENTING: ( elf( elf/�f organization) G:\wp.dts\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc S 0 I / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: d /-ZS IbA kl?,"S OPJ,'V U`Z (number/street) 1 Y��r !/rC >GDJ CzWc/' (city/zip cod TELEPHONE: C -- e��J��� REPRESENTING: _�Gb(' (self/na of organization) G:\wp.dta\adman\BS\FORMS\Requeat to Speak.doo / o V REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: JI.,L 2-* *2eo AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) vp�i�- C AA4-L Y HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip� e) code) � TELEPHONE: 71 > "/ 0-3-760 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc ' REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: O 2— AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 7:1)o.d HOME ADDRESS: -'D-7G/ (number/ treet) (city ^^/zip //co^ode) 0��n TELEPHONE: l�93��� �, u7"t REPRESENTING: ��� (self/na o organization) G:\wp.dWa dmin\BS\FORMBRequest to Speak.doc / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Z6 Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 'P// Z.a.V 7l.�Zt HOME ADDRESS: Rl9 � Okje IE Y1 O 0 (number/street) Cost,, MeS in C (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: t°�) 64S REPRESENTING: SEI� (self/name of organization) r / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ✓ All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �c- 12 6 G 2- AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) V, Co FU 4;0 HOME ADDRESS: V� � 4r ,, Sf Ar + 1- 5 (number/street) � . si. A? C (city/zip code)c/ TELEPHONE: ( `f v K ) G C/G ` 7 `/ REPRESENTING (self/na�Ca me of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the speck item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: 706 %z /Y�4uHrfJ (number/street) if,o,Ec-n 1241. h,/G , CA (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 'l�Y�j � ` 7/S- 2/ 95 REPRESENTING: O 6G (self/name of organization) r/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS / All persons wis ing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: oc. — �V^UI AGENDA ITEM NO. kIt-UCf NAME: (please print) l )Gtha .mil Vic- ✓+ i HOME ADDRESS: RP�cd"YC\ (number/str� Lo C-"' Cc-& 26S / (city/4 code) TELEPHONE: / q9 REPRESENTING: vr:F (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be give o the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for d/istr�ibution. DATE: `7 (0 2450Z- AGENDA ITEM NO. �VIe(2- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) - (:)ow lmp'.Tp ,,, HOME ADDRESS: z92l (number/street) ,,^ ' ��� (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: � ZG —C, AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) SOH-(•I (', ::zFf0 M 1+ 5 HOME ADDRESS: 1 7 'TR AVLoQ Ltl AV (number/street) rf�R PI_ At r)-RoyE l� (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: -%/y S 6 c/—/� 2 99 REPRESENTING: '!�"P L-F (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS / All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: o Z Z AGENDAITEMNO. (/vPIVF/r, NAME: (please print) C h2/5��// EVAA/5 HOME ADDRESS: P,D . dox ay (number/street) SA-V 616 �Te Cy, 72o 7y-01d (city//'zip code) TELEPHONE: ( 9yyqe�a' Fi ?6 REPRESENTING: S!J(lTR/06/7 / CIUNOR r�/t) (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. -� � DATE: —� AGENDA ITEM NO. G�/VY t/d fL_ NAME: (please print) ��� l�l �d // , • HOME ADDRESS: (,naumpber/street)\1 n , q I LJc�cC,' rr7GrP I l � 1 �� (city/zip code) �j CL� TELEPHONE: �"/ ) F� �J 5 —Q7—� g REPRESENTING: rot C- (self/name of organization) r--D"JF- REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. / DATE: G - O L AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) I) 0C ✓ X (-Z- f i / L HOME ADDRESS: 1/0 3 /,1 'q - C U t/E - (number/street) / J/ (cityh/ipcocodre) /c� TELEPHONE: � Y/7 �y — REPRESENTING: (self ameoforganization) GAwp.dte\adminteSIFORMSVteque tto Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: O�Oo� AGENDAITEMNO. WaIKR Sol NAME: (please print) F( anayan HOME ADDRESS: �S �� �IR� , U^+ (number/street) Cv�:-k--a ,Yesz CA 9a&aT (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: SC (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dtatadm1MBW0RWRequmt to Speak.doc Z REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) k'c A HOME ADDRESS: . O I , 'I (number/street) !?�( 'tj , ( (city/zip code) �[ TELEPHONE: ,h 'z G - ' REPRESENTING: G a (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dbtadmintBSXFORMS\Request b Speak.dac / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS V All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. i DATE: t /. C AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) I r 5 s P d ('9 41 ru HOME ADDRESS: i 6 7 (number/street) A 6 , � YC9 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: S C+' — -7 s l = 7 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G1wp.dtatadmiMBS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc T/ `. / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the speck item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. l/Yt]tJJ�q NAME: (please print) �� eow�`/ HOME ADDRESS: �I( � ULb D�—et'�k�u''F --R�`" 'j (number/street) -�-� (y (city/zip e) TELEPHONE: 9N -7,>3 S "T REPRESENTING: ��_ l eJASTS/'�r (self/name of organization) GAwp.dWadmin%B51F0RM5Request to Speak.dm Zg REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: J::Z/o r REPRESENTING: St/ Oe, ;,adde.� (self/name of organization) Giwp.dWadmint S\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS v All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) T�_1 S �uc ltuui HOME ADDRESS: f7�LJ Cc,Q.�u jl- (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dWe dminWST0RMS\Request 0 Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �C L� AGENDA ITEM NO. e t . . . . .,�.I . . . . . ,�./y.��/... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ^� REPRESENTING: W (self/name of organization) GAwp.dW%dmin06XF0RMSXRequest to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. AS determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 6 Z 6 O'Z- AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) cJ ry HOME ADDRESS: s S ` r� (number/street) f ©N/0 'X<;� (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization G?wp.ft\admin0SW0RMSVteque tto Speak.dm / s I / nEQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: a 0 L AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) /I " �17&- / (" CII HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) /�_�G (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: .- REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) GAwp.dtaXadminXBS%FORMSXRequmt b Speak.dm �,. REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) F t HOME ADDRESS: "— J (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: I REPRESENTING: 61 Q�LUIf<; (self/name of organization) Wwp.dta�dmintBS\FORMMV nest to Speak.doc 3 , / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS `� All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) '��Tp HOME ADDRESS: 3040 .5, /— ✓'/^1 10. wAY 6 (number/street) O l: N �jGF CIA ? 2R&L (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: > REPRESENTING: 9/C k /?A C- i— CLI (self/name of organization) GA.p.dM\admin\BSW0RMS%Requeat to Speak.doc ..VREQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 7_(p AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 0�F'r1S -;2;k HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) 14un/T1 / rDN Aca1 CA— (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 71!:l -leg REPRESENTING: !:—E! (self/name of organization) GAwp.dWadmintBS\FORMSRequest to Speak.daa REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. r/ DATE: (c�/ 16Z/n J— AGENDA ITEM NO. `� " )� _ C NAME: (please print) Ma-I+ M 'Lof�4 HOME ADDRESS: -�; / 3 y0(�z 4C� un (number/street) (city/zip code / TELEPHONE: ( 7/G ) S3h - -f 5C/� i REPRESENTING: S.rgr,drr (self/name of organization) G:1wp.dtftdrnWBST0RMSV2equesl W Speak.dm 75 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIR CTORS All pe ons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: G Z/ AGENDA ITEM NO. �VG NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) ll�f _ z?a (city/zip code) /n TELEPHONE: 74Y ' 96Z REPRESENTING: 5VI-r (self/name of organization) GAwp.dtMadmtn1BSW0RMSRequest to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) jy�{,,, Chu �� )z ,. HOME ADDRESS: V Q ` o rP� � /� � rcq I � CA C4 (number/street) of zleel (city/An code) TELEPHONE: V / REPRESENTING: OAJ S UM (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS l/ All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: C� AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) G " 4r le� S ACC Kd r HOME ADDRESS: �3 SgY�IeL gG l7 /"e. (number/street) Sd�, C le i CC (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: - `/lam REPRESENTING: J U /--PAS . (self/name of organization) G9wp.dUtadmWBMF0RMS\Request to Speak.doc / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: C'9 --1 �' — © � AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: 290 e0S +4 (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dtMadmin\BSTORMS\Re uest tc Speak.doc L3 sh/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons Wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the ?7 Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: `b " AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: 73� WAJI✓Mokb Dt- (number/street) wk(Ina C/A 9660/ (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 62,6 Zs$ 6oZf REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) ✓✓✓/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ObIa610 ca AGENDAITEMNO. v.9 A\VL2 NAME: (please print) JAn1\tt— U)1LL\flANS HOME ADDRESS: R081 GARIRtL) a6 (number/street) k•R. , cA �1�.61-16 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: —f 101-- US--OU53 REPRESENTING: SEX-F (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons shing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 6' - AGENDA ITEM NO. W41 VtDZ NAME: (please print) (tV HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) 51-'+ (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ::2 /�1 ,7 REPRESENTING: SC:LF (self/name of organization) GAwp.dtMadmm 8W0RMS\Reques1 to Speak.dm REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons✓✓✓wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOMEADDRESS: Z6 7 _ (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: �a (self/namV organizatio G:\wp.dWWminXBS%FORMSUtequesl to Speak.d. j� �J REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �-D 2- AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 'V y7/�` N ,A I-R Q )g {r HOME ADDRESS: ' ' / 3O ' '9,RjEpA'}«1 (number/street) ,N_ Tz . 1 ((ciity/zi c1ode) ' L TELEPHONE: I7 t p / Tcyc — 1p7 3 U REPRESENTING: fI S I (self/name of organization) Giwp.dt WdminOSFORMS\Requesl to Speak.doc , REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS �---� All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: (-Q AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . .{.r��. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: S t-11 G ELD ( 0Cr Cl'Ku-E (number/street) k u O-K-. S c + . C&� , R 7Lte`l4 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ` i4-&q(o-?331 REPRESENTING: SL.f-F RtDEr--- :C-70u,JOd{YI�IJ (self/name of organization) GA.p.dlaladminlBSIFORMSRKuesl to Speak.doe REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: obl!-ok AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . ..t-�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) rr��Cr,P-)N � bo ,�I HOME ADDRESS: r/U I94a 1�,�Y.�-�Y6Y( �1 � 04 (number/street) (city /zip code) TELEPHONE: r G l_/ t ���-��GI D 7 l w 1 REPRESENTING: N/`v� 1 ^71 (self/name of organization) GAwp.dtetadmintBSTORMS1Requ tb Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 02' AGENDA ITEM NO. h * ; NAME: (please print) -/�- HOME ADDRESS: G (number/street) (cityy/alp code) / TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organiza4on)y--/-)�� G.wpAaXadniMBSFORMSRequest b Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. /^ DATE: �—�� AGENDA ITEM NO. gc2I(k) NAME: (please print) �GL✓•c(, ffD HOME ADDRESS: 206 (number/street) Pb °1-Z696 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: � ✓7' �NLJ3 REPRESENTING: I (se organization) --- G1wp.dta\admin\BS\F0RMMRequest to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. /_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ NAME: (please print) Vr•Y •l 7arltlE�a�Qa HOME ADDRESS: G`y A/ l WL- (number/stre /r:'1,,11grt,.14 ("s ?�2s3/ - 73/ (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 71% 071 7Cf©G REPRESENTING: ��/ IF— (self/name of organization) G1wp.dYa dminXBS1F0RMSV2equest to Speak.doc V; REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �/ _ * * * z AGENDA. . . NO.. * ' NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: 1 Jr 1 ?, ( A /4 (number/street) c v C�, (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 7 2-- D6/ Z C/ REPRESENTING: 2 selfInaffie of organization) GAwpAWadminWT01O 1SWR uwtto Spwk.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the speck Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: (A°1 NO AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 4a4 ' � 1�L ��, HOME ADDRESS: (n3 t 0 -= o V CZVj'P, 6t yd— (number/street) [PS l LAs CA g o o b b (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: p� REPRESENTING: I�f/�' CLI 1�saixus Qe-�(A5e GDUVNd (self/name of organization) G.1 p.dla�mhXBSTORMSXRe ue to Speak.dm REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All pr/onswishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the speck Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: /J AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (numb r/street) c /zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G1wp.dtaWdmNBWORMSPR ue t0 Spe k.dw REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All pVrsons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: � AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) vrif�cS� TKO A he f 6 HOME ADDRESS: o�- L O 2 t� (nu er/street) fa ,nge (city/zip code) / TELEPHONE: l 7 V � 6 `� ✓ REPRESENTING: S P IS (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dWXadmin�SWORMSRequest to Speak.doc Ving REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wiso address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: e, AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) /-YAa HOME ADDRESS: � /� /fir, (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: /S'— 9 7y—i (o cf 7 REPRESENTING: -5'£/(' (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) Rtid' /'t 0//��/ HOME ADDRESS: �I k,Sb7�� C,C � (number/street) er/street) 116 y u� (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) GA.p.dMadminlBS1FORMS\Request W Smak.doc f/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) rZ Z& r HOME ADDRESS: Z'61 41:4 nn re AUZ_ (number/street) (city/zi ode) TELEPHONE: �5-FiZ 6,Zl REPRESENTING: 5LlX t'- ey' 1,0144 (self/name of organiza GAwp.dFaW.hUMFORMS1Request 0 Speak.doc / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: (o ` �2(o —C 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 2- RO t 1 HOME ADDRESS: ;2-C) V k r'JlS /T, (number/street) S-Q-e k 6 e o-cG. (city/zip code)y/ TELEPHONE: L REPRESENTING: Ze (self/name of organization) Gdwp.dWXadmh%BS1F0RMSReque to Speak.doc V ' REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: :5U' V1f. a6, dOO� AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) hnC'leS1n C,f oLKf �' L . HOME ADDRESS: 3 1 (-d M d I� V e. (number/street) Lows, �eac , �!©� Ly (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ID- r+6' 1 y- � ;( o l REPRESENTING: S Ls(-? f r cj (self/name of organization) G:\wp.draladmin\BSIFORMSUtequeal to Speak.dm 1 / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) A PR IL L 0VF- HOME ADDRESS: 15 N t AZ A 4) S l ' (number/street) SPV)1V E 94Goy (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 00y- 82,,1- 7' ' a 7 REPRESENTING: 54 (self/na a of organization) G\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc 7D / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: I O� AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: 3 S r(. S Awl 4Y� 0 (number/street) ��utitL�+ r` c`3 c��G cep 4� (9,-t (city/zip code)c TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dtatadmWBS%FORMS%Request to Speak.doc . V REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: U-C, a(or OZ AGENDA ITEM NO. //f," NAME: (please print) Shcrn L.o✓I.f�,- 'd HOME ADDRESS: IIVF-S `rY�GLrp- S �• (number/street) i tL5-�,'n I GA q,�"7k-)-- (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: - 6­06— �9 7 a- REPRESENTING i YJQ (organizat' n4a/7{!/ (self/na of ) � v�r0�/yZo�7� G:\wp.dW\ad.in\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: lJ AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 NAME: (please print) \( `e- HOME ADDRESS: 0 O 00 nu ber/st e (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: l l (self/name oorganization) GAwp.dtMadm1MBS1F0RMMRegoest to Speak.doc - Z REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 2 6 b a AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 01 A) NAME: (please print) 'D r r e ll 01 - f J HOME ADDRESS: lS130 I Rcdk,lwzs� #IY6 (number/street) �j w•4(`/tr, , i� j�vL 9Q653 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dtatadmintBS\FORMS\Request b Speak.doc / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Z/ AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) H/ (��J�r7",/�7� HOME ADDRESS: / 6 ; 3 ffK9 UIZAVA✓- (number/street) (city/zip code) 7 / TELEPHONE: 4 �``A� q -2y`r 5?- Zoy -t — REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dta dmintBSWORMS\Re ue b Speak.dm REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution,,. 11 nn,nn'' y� DATE: l9 O AGENDA 1111110. V I G C NAME: (please print) m 0.r21 1��1� a � 0- r ` 1 HOME ADDRESS: JS I Le Lo S 2 (number/street) (city/zip code) �j �J TELEPHONE: "I( 5 '1 (1 75 I REPRESENTING: -S e- `� (self/name of organization) Giwp. F\adminOSTORMSXRequmt to Speak.doc / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) —� / _ HOME ADDRESS: l�s' rn L rlze tooGe _ (number/street) (ci ' code) 17- TELEPHONE: �C REPRESENTING: -( 'a' S FOI�i (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dta\admin\BMFORMS\Request to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the // Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: lD �' 6 ^ AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) /. A�l HOME ADDRESS: Ct 59 2- I Ve S I TJ (number/street)e � (10OWn'- �s'7- gO7Or0 (city/zip code) 1e) / TELEPHONE: - "I/, b I — 61 q qO REPRESENTING: �E L F (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORWRequest to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: -26,02— AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) A- L- 1 pA W&S HOME ADDRESS: ( 4'31k SF+2FwAvF d�Rty� (number/street) IWNrWcrTON r32ACH CA 9L�vC� (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: (-710 760 SSfs REPRESENTING: 51CnA~ ""!s (self/name of organization) G:1wp.dtaladmin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: * O e ' * e e ' AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) D HOME ADDRESS: \ r (number/street) 11 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: q-is - 2 7 $57n5— REPRESENTING: 5 (self/name of organization) GAwp.dtaWm1nXB9F0RMS1Reque bSpeak.doc . J REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board/Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: — L� AGENDA ITEM NO. I�� NAME: (please print) 7:::'V-kGI'n HOME ADDRESS: �-73 7 Z 1:;; f1 L i v1D L\'r L\ � (number/street) \� �S 7 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) GAwp.d1a\admin\RW0RMS%RNuesl W Speakdw ' REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: a�' AGENDA ITEM NO. V4?L,/G OYlf1& 4 NAME: (please print) /:W A l /��/VY,` HOME ADDRESS: AyE�'eE$ .D (number/street) W n (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: Jr,,L� / 59 — 9K52(-) y� REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dta\admin\BSIFORMS\Request tc Speak.doc / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. AS determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) Vt�'ci(cy S/tKEN/AS HOME ADDRESS: Z 5#457A-- (number/street) 7z-6/L (city/zip code)TELEPHONE: / T�I^ �O(7 e (1-Re REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G9wpAlMadminUISFORMSRe ueal 0 Syeak.dm / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: � `� AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 ,11 74 °u Cilvr�y Nuysth / n ] NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) Y T� t CA- f2,G C (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 'I (� Q �a 3 g6 tl REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dtatadmin%BSXF0RMSV2equwt[o Speak.dw REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS )XZpersons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. / DATE: (�i7 AGENDA ITEM NO. � / 141 (�/a' I/eY-- NAME: (please print) ✓' /�Z LJI') Q/HOME ADDRESS: f/ T ✓/�/'1 U!'4 Cfcr (number/street) -x 925�2 (aty/a�7 TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) GAw .dWadminSSXFORMSWNuest to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �� 02 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) l✓� HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) ?�/�G� ✓�� Pz�66 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: ��``� (self/name of org�fi) G1wp.dba dmhXBSW0RMSRNue t W Spe k.dw REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: O AGENDA ITEM NO. 3o / TI NAME: (please print) p / HOME ADDRESS: f s ivy I�Q.t �r-e_ (num er/street) U09 (city/zip code) //II TELEPHONE: / r REPRESENTING: (self/name rganization) G:\wp.dta\edm1n\B$T0RMS\Request to Speek.doe REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES @_EQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution./p Q //r1 /[,U DATE: _�� AGENDA ITEM NO. �l VV (� NAME: (please print) • . ' .��� * \\. l / �— Vve�ty •`\;\\v� ( �O HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) I ,L—I�n (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: _JC (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dWWmin0V,F0RMS1Request to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wish ng to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the speck item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: (O/24�/Cj Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) —tteidi kkkoer HOME ADDRESS: Z. « l�Z E kFS� 7C✓� (number/street) 0LA� Ck C(2(4 ( (city'hlIip p e) TELEPHONE: /`I 1 ` 7?—S y366 REPRESENTING: selc— (self/name of organization) G9wp.dtatadminSS1F0RMSVtequest to Speak.duc / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS b All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 0 Zile, & 6A- HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: �/l— S�G — ✓ q l REPRESENTING: ���P yCe�d� (self/name of organization) G:\wp.dta\admin\BSTORMSRe uest to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTOR All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �41e" ZJ�7 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (numbe /street) II 3 ' (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: /—) � REPRESENTING: ��-'-�-'` pjF� (self/name of organization) G:kwp.dWe dmin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc {`- ) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 2 0 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) Te car/ Do/no n o� HOME ADDRESS: 1020 f• St (number/street) P-2� cA %2648 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: —71J �271 0376 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) Wwp.dtatadminSSTORMS1Request to Speak.doc J REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 6 Q AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: td (number/street (city/zip TELEPHONE: !- REPRESENTING: (self/name of or nization) GAwp.dWadminMT0WSIReque W Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. AS determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the speck item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 16 f/ �� AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) /�l/3�ifL( �i�,C°i�G•0 HOME ADDRESS: > S 040 U/S7A° (number/street)/ram SiSril/ Fry En/J,"� (cii14`vr/zipcode) TELEPHONE: 1 / 51? C&z— !c;7 �7 REPRESENTING: SELF (self/name of organization) G.wp.dlaledminXBSIFORMS\Requesl 4 Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: �" AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: �Y•9'T�- V Imo- , '"-�'Y! ✓� (number/street) (clolkip code) p� TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name o rganization) G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request W Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. AS determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: _e . AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) /a /"/L�/` * J HOME ADDRESS: 7,3X / Z (n ber/street) � � n 10VA ll'r (city/zip/N��/ code) TELEPHONE: / / aQ3 REPRESENTING: o serfs (self/name of organization) G:Wp.tlte d.inlBSIFORMSUieque tto Spe k.dm REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 6 - Z 6- O Z AGENDA ITEM NO. LtAl . . . . . . .//. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) No',-Ik C4heK / HOME ADDRESS: -5--o9I 5-ky (number/streety }4MJ7.,k, i0«L4 (city/zip de) TELEPHONE: t)1g) -nay- '3� G p REPRESENTING: M✓fC�.h c�df��/"''tJ� (self/n me of organization) G:\wp.dW%admin\BS\FORMS\Re uest b Speak.dw REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to"the �Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) .,,�YII'llTer(/��1"1(IYYbhr�(��Lg r7/' HOME ADDRESS: C J P)fl l-A el l,I A( E � 26 number/street) un-hnc�a gi n Beach a646 (citity/zip/clod )) TELEPHONE: q 10q—n(0P53 REPRESENTING: ) sel ame of organization) G:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\Request to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: yG a— AGENDA ITEM NO. Ar NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: 25d ('� < N�'j L.ArAI 6 k9 k (number/street) N4-�l 9Za6 3 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ?,96 F, REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) GAwp.dWadminSSTORMSXReque 1to Speak.doc y / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. AS determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) WIFIL MALL-F-4 HOME ADDRESS: IW1 5 &AR1 .5-F (number/street) Aem /� Nn�- ZIM (-Aq 2 O Ot (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: -7I-t ^ �'1j - REPRESENTING: P�PL w(,° vice-3" w:.140.rr (steel/nameof organization) Wn�rM�+y ybo,} Giwp.dWadminXBS\FORMSXRequW to Speak.doc REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: G�6/G Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) �✓'a...,.j"—y—�� �1 �S HOME ADDRESS: LI t GI 1 �.S<i -� AL,-- (number/street) ,4,4 .IQv ,x- r5cacL, rca . 526f3 (cit y/zip code) / c, TELEPHONE: S ��C/,� (, LI�i l 3 REPRESENTING: Sc/� (self/name of organization) G9wp.dtalsdmWB51F0RMS%FtKuest to Speak.doc ` / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: N -7,6 —o Z' AGENDA ITEM NO. 97O Ch Ui F�1V✓� NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: 2-3V--7 (number/street) (city/zip code) ��1 — 7� TELEPHONE: I I G o 1'i6 REPRESENTING: S'Fili ` (self/name of organization) GAwpAtaWdmin MFORMS\Request to Speak.doc . REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 7'6 aZ_ AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: �L?,O�- I ��� ()k (number/street) ��e�uit�� P�,Uoh 617_bh3 (city/zip colds) TELEPHONE: olLIC)" \O,", M-b REPRESENTING: JQ� (self/name of organization) G:\wp.tlla\admin\BSFORMS\Requesl to Speak.doc � ; � r � '/ ; � � i i i �,'. � // i i / : • I. � , / � � / � � q M : , � , � s � � � i I � �� � � f l� ' � / � � � / , � � �� � � // � 0 ' jai ' � � ,� i � . , j , : r�-� � yi i I �� � s � � � , ��� i / �' / '� i� �� �/ �� �� ' , � � , � � � �. � � � �© , � r,, 213 I Cl l I S , p 0-5tL4 l ( .�h-taw l�-�� , ✓ l� . �- i i i `� � � 1 r ► i � �. � i � �� � / � / � � ,�, . , , � � �. � � i ' ' ►� ' 7 i'� i ' � i / � � i� ' � i , . � � ,I " ' � ' i ' �� '!� • � i � � � � i � � �� . � � ��� . � � r �/' / � ,� ' 'r � fi �-. A . . . a . . . . . �. r . A �► �► �► .� A A � kry T _. _ '. __. ._ _.. ._ _ .. I _.. . __ . ._ -' _� .. ._. .. _. .. .'.. _.. _ _._ . . I ___ . _.. . _ :.. _ _ . _� I � l - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0�3 j i i _ �� _ wa � � �v ` � � ,� I�, ^ Iw 4r� Mw �. ram. .� A /ti r, Pam, ^ ;� �� f4 .� /`� r', � ,� N - �. . ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: June 26, 2002 TIME: 6:30 p.m. (MURPHY)........................ ALVAREZ....................... �L ✓ (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... . ✓ ✓ (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD................... ✓ �G v (MILLER).......................... BRADY ........................ .. (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ...................�� ✓ (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE.............. (CRANDALL).................... RAIN.......... ... (SHAWVER) nnNAHIIF ,,,��JG _ (UNDERHILL)................... E.................� (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... ✓ �G �G (DUVALL)......................... GUL-LH GGIll ................ (DEBOLT)......................... JEMPSA...................... (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... G_ _� ✓ (SMITH)............................ KROM........................ ✓ i �G (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES..........................� i (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... �G ✓ (CHRISTY) ....................... MC GUIGAN.................. ✓�G �� (SIMONOFF) .................... MOORE........................ LG i (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............. �G w (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. �G ✓ _� (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ (ADAMS) ......................... RIDGEWAY................... �� _G ✓ (DOW) .............................. SIGLER...........................G ✓ ✓ (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... i ✓ (BLAKE)............................ WALKER........................,g� ✓ STAFF: / Anderson 0 Ghirelli K le ✓ ,L-edvairr— ✓ Mathews Miles v' Murphy ✓ Oaten i Tomko Streed OTHERS: nN� Woodruff ✓ �u' _d ._ _,_x,',C�l;", Andrus Nixon 06/19/02 G:\wp.dta\adminlBS\DIRECTOR\Directors Roll Call.dm SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CPI' leh BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) (pleaseprint) Do cp* �a r £e _ �b6 D oo G O�1 m,:'*-ti 1.i- 120/J rn� C�4RNi �tAl >I a.le•S a .... d Si, i`S� �o<..c �. � • I• -fir � G_ Q t z SSa r h Ve6ouoce E41 h Ia rrl Sie 6 HAWP.DTA\ADMIMWFORMS\SIGN-IN FORM.DOC SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) �,FJ �QzaCr -S,r�t.c 0err,k,- i + �( / ftx c� c cw 1 ' ^ � I � � / cpti v�¢.v�11.4�k 2 rc��.7 islano to- / U A-tttt. s� HAWP.DTAlADMIMBS\FORMS%lGN-IN FORM.DOC SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) O P L1- 5 n/ F7Z 62 £ L--ZF 44 vC-)d ,V 11 Q F. v-C S e pigs Sur-{'V�' �R! Cuu.�1 sc2fi nl morae cszll �vL tJO O i8-6 I IJLa t4 s[s e•G �l r r i -ro Vh oM/ zElt W�-T�4y H:\NP.DTAWDMINIBS\FORMS\SIGN-IN FORM.DOC • k SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM lease r' (please print)_ r+ l 0 c� � 0 en `�11Dep-lie r e o�Z f " LL 7 1e,• I Aktiwa! Qcsou,'�¢� I�Set e c4 San H:\WP.DTAWDMIN\BS\FORMS\SIGN-IN FORMAOC CHAIR'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 26TH, 2002 I HAVE APPOINTED DIRECTOR ROY MOORE TO SERVE AS VICE CHAIR OF THE FAHR COMMITTEE, REPLACING SHAWN BOYD. AND PATTY CAMPBELL, THE NEW DIRECTOR FROM SEAL BEACH, WILL SERVE ON THE FAHR COMMITTEE. 2. ONLY THE FAHR COMMITTEE WILL BE MEETING IN JULY, ON THE 10T". THE OTHER WORKING COMMITTEES ARE DARK. THE REGULAR SCHEDULE WILL RESUME IN AUGUST. 3. 1 WANT TO REMIND YOU THAT THE JULY MEETING WILL BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH. THIS CHANGE FROM THE FOURTH WEDNESDAY IS TO ACCOMMODATE THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL MEETING. THE MEETING IS SCHEDULED TO �C BEGIN AT 6 P.M. THIS WILL ALLOW PLENTY OF TIME FOR THE BOARD TO DISCUSS THE LEVEL OF i TREATMENT ISSUE. ALTHOUGH IT WON'T BE MY CALL-IT'S UP TO THE NEW INCOMING CHAIR OF THE BOARD, IT'S MY RECOMMENDATION AND THAT OF THE STEERING COMTTEE TO RESTRICT PUBLIC COMMENTS TO MINUTES. WE HAVE RECEIVED OVER 20 HOURS OF PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE DURING THE LAST 18 MONTHS. FOR THIS REASON, THIS BOARD IS WELL AWARE OF THE PREVAILING SENTIMENT HELD BY MOST OF THE PUBLIC THAT HAVE ADDRESSED US. NOW IT'S OUR TURN (AND RESPONSIBILITY) TO SPEAK AND TO ACT. z REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE TO THE BOARD WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 2002 AT 5 P.M. 1 . THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 22, 2002 STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING WERE APPROVED AS DRAFTED. 2. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR: 3. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER: A. AN UPDATE WAS PROVIDED ON THE DISINFECTION PROJECT. B. EPA AND THE REGIONAL BOARD ACTIONS MODIFYING OUR DISCHARGE PERMIT WERE DISCUSSED. THESE MODIFICATIONS AREA RESULT OF OUR MOVING TO DISINFECTION. C. AN UPDATE WAS PROVIDED ON THE BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. D. GARY STREED UPDATED THE STEERING COMMITTEE ON THE ADVERSE CONDITION OF THE INSURANCE MARKET AND HOW EXPENSIVE RATES HAVE BECOME. THE STEERING COMMITTEE DIRECTED THE GENERAL TI0 �� 'r � 3 E. WE BRIEFLY DISCUSSED TONIGHT'S AGENDA ITEM #17C REGARDING THE AWARD OF THE ULTRA VIOLET LIGHT SUPPLY CONTRACT FOR GWRS TO TROJAN TECHNOLOGIES. THE STEERING COMMITTEE rx- h -� 4. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. A DISCUSSION WAS HELD AT THE REQUEST OF DIRECTOR ANDERSON ON PLACING THE QUESTION OF LEVEL OF TREATMENT AS A BALLOT MEASURE. THE STEERING COMMITTEE DECIDED jjj B. THE STEERING COMMITTEE ADVISED STAFF ON THE FORMAT AND CONDUCT OF THE JULY 17 BOARD MEETING REGARDING THE LEVEL OF TREATMENT DECISION. WE DECIDED TO START THE MEETING AT Q P.M., TO LIMIT---NO'FEfM1T- PUBLIC COMMENTS TO �A MINUTES, TO HAVE PUBLIC COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE BOARD'S DELIBERATIONS AND TO CONCLUDE ALL a MATTERS RELATED TO LEVEL OF TREATMENT PRIOR TO ADDRESSING ALL OTHER MATTERS NOT RELATED TO LEVEL OF TREATMENT. C. THE AGENDA ITEM SCHEDULED FOR REVIEW BY THE FAHR COMMITTEE IN JULY WASN'T DISCUSSED. D. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ON AGENDA ITEMS ON TONIGHT'S BOARD AGENDA WERE DISCUSSED. THERE WAS NO CLOSED SESSION. 5 Anderson, Blake, 04:02 PM 4/122002-0700,FW: Surfriders page.doc Page 1 of 1 From: "Anderson, Blake" <BANDERSON@OCSD.COM> To: "Evans, Chris" <cevans@surfrider.org> Subject: FW: Surfriders page.doc Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:02:26 -0700 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Chris In the interest of truth: > —Original Message--- > From: Murphy, Lisa > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:59 PM >To: Anderson, Blake > Subject: FW: Surfriders page.doc > This is the information that will be useful for you when you talk to Chris > Evans about the misinformation on the Surfrider Web site. > —Original Message----- > From: Wassgren, Sonja > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:34 AM > To: Murphy, Lisa > Subject: Surfriders page.doc > «Surfriders page.doc>> > I don't even know how to answer some of these because they are > s000000000000 idiotic! EJSurfriders paage.doc Printed for Chris Evans<cevans@surfrider.org> 626/2002 My name is Judith M. Gielow of 469 East 18th Street, Costa Mesa, and I am not speaking for the League of Women Voters tonight; after the meeting of June 19 and information received at that time, the League is not ready to make a statement , but I would like to speak for myself and the St Mark Presbyterian Church Ecophilians Environmental Group. 4"YAP, OM Cc9L(!?/�',rf �th C6ahh'co We support measures which strive to assure the health of the ocean and which assure that our sewage is not polluting either the ocean or the beaches. We expect this goal to be met. Having seen that in an OCSD poll, the majority of those responding would pay up to $75 more a year in order to have clean oceans and beaches. And,... Having learned from Ken Theisen of the RWQCB that even with disinfection, Full Secondary as prescribed in the Clean Water Act ( the 1970's biological process of activated sludge) will not clean the water of the beasties and chemicals that we really want gone, and that the RWQCB would ask more of the OCSD than the prescribed Full Secondary treatment. And, ... Whereas the test results are not yet complete or made public because the blue ribbon panel has suggested how to make the results more thorough and has volunteered to help do the necessary testing which will delay the final report, And,... Since delaying a decision on whether or not to apply for a waiver until the test results are complete and made public could possibly result in penalties and is therefore not a responsible way to manage the Sanitation District's discharge, as we heard June 19th, we suggest that you err on the conservative side by removing any culpability from the OCSD's plume possibly polluting the ocean and the beaches,... We hereby recommend that the Orange County Sanitation District Board decide in favor of Dr. Ghirelli's choice #4 for action options which is to pursue a higher level of treatment by immediately directing the staff to begin negotiations with the EPA and the RWQCB for a compliance schedule and a transitional permit plan schedule. At the same time, we would recommend that the OCSD Board consult with the technical staff to determine what treatments to use to reach the most stringent standards, not the prescribed Full Secondary, necessarily, but a higher level of treatment , possibly a combination of methods that accomplishes the Federal and State goals. This would be a win/win for all concernedl Please give your staff the higher treatment goal, and let the staff work out with the EPA and the RWQCB�the best treatmentl Anderson,Blake, 04:02 PM 4/12/2002-0700,FW: Surfriders page.doc Page 1 of 1 From: "Anderson, Blake" <BANDERSON a@OCSD.COM> To: "Evans, Chris" <cevans@surfrider.org> Subject: FW: Surfriders page.doc Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:02:26 -0700 X-Mailer. Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Ciuis In the interest of truth: > —Original Message— • From: Murphy, Lisa > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:59 PM > To: Anderson, Blake > Subject: FW: Surfriders page.doc > This is the information that will be useful for you when you talk to Chris > Evans about the misinformation on the Surfrider Web site. > —Original Message-- • From: Wassgren, Sonja > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:34 AM > To: Murphy, Lisa > Subject: Surfriders page.doc > «Surfriders page.doc>> > r'don't even know how to answer some of these because they are > s000000000000 idioticl ®Surfriders page.doc s Printed for Chris Evans <cevans@surfrider.org> 6/26/2002 06/26/2002 08:55 5202299042 now PAGE 92 1 1 2002 i i June�. i SENT BY FACSIMII.E(412-797-4511)AND O$MAIM. Calgoa rbon Attend : Mr. Robert O'Brien P.O_ Be c 717 Pittsbur Pennsylvania 15230-0771 Re: Legal ability of Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation Districts to award a contract for the design;and famishing or Ultraviolet - Disinfecti0n and Oxidation Equipment to Calgon Carbon Dear M .O'Brien: Last week Calgon Carbon engaged this firm to provide to you our opinion on the above-referenced topic. Jr,preparing this opinion,we reviewed the spccific itions for the subject project,conferred with counsel to the Orange Countytation Districts and conducted relevant legal research. Our opinion stated it this letter is based upon the following circumstances which we learned from tal dog to your representatives,speaking withh counsel to the Orange County Sanitati. n Districts and reviewing the written materials memiourd above: During January of this year,the Orange County Water District ("Wate District" sometimes hereinafter)and Orange County Sanitation Districts (-Sanib Jon Districts"sometimes hereinafter},through then engineers,Camp Dresser &McKee, published Proposal Specifications("the Specifications" hereina ter)for--designing and furnishing ultraviolet disinfection and oxidation equipm nt and appurtenances requirod for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) ystem Permanent UV Disinfection and Oxidation System"for the above-r fereaced Districts'joint project (See Specifications, Section 01010, 1.01 B I )and"...designing and furnishing ultraviolet disinfection and oxidation equipm in and appurtenances required for the groundwater replenishment(GWR) system emonstration UV systems." (Specifications,Section 01011, ).O1Bla). Section 2.01 of the Pre-Selection Agreement contained in the Specific ions describes the project to be bid,upon as follows' rib/2b/2002 08:55 5202299042 DREWRY PAGE 03 Calgon arbon Attentio : Mr.Robert O'Brien June 25,2002 Page 2 "The project for which the bids and support services are to be rovided under the contract document is generally described as follows: esign,fabrication and delivery of demonstration and Pemmnent "violet Disinfection and Oxidation System and ancillary components, istance during installation of the goods,commissioning of the m01150 bon Ultraviolet Disinfection and Oxidation System and ommissioniag of the Permanent Ultraviolet Disinfection and Oxidation ystem,delivery of operation and rmiinterrmce manuals,one year of Aerations assistance and warranty ofthe ultraviolet Lamps and ystem...." Sections 2.04 and 2.05 of the Pre-Selection Agreement make it clear thi I the project to be bid upon does not include installation of the designed and fabi icated equipment in the structure in which it is to be housed The Specific ions utilize terminology and concepts such as delivery of goods (Specifi wions,PmaScicv icn Agreement,Section 4.01)and assignment of risk of loss dur ng transport(Specifications,Pre-Selection Agreement,Section 6.03) which c onmonly are utilized in agreements for the purchase of goods rather than the com iructain of stnrctares and buildings. Further,the proposal form contained in the Specifications(page 00400.1 recogmites that different bidders will be offering the use of different propriet wy design features. Thus,the project includes the designing of equipmem to meet he needs of the Districts as distinguished from bidding to supply fungible labor ac I materials in accordance with specifications already prescribing all design c Iments- Finally,the Specifications do not provide for a calculation of the low bid 3y computing wit prices for items incorporated in the pmject or by lump sum,all fmally determinable upon opening of bids. Rather,the proposals are evalun on a"life cycle cost basis'provided for in Section 0D310 of the Specifi4 anons. Jn other words,the low bidder is in part identified by the projecti n of expected operational costs of the equipment as well as the bid price for desi m and fabrication You have informed us that two,companies responded to the Spm ions and that Calgon Carbon was not determined to be the lowest cost propose '. The narrow question presented is whether the Districts nevertheless may a a contract for the Project described in the Specifcaiioro to Calgon Carbon. 06/26/2002 08:55 5202299042 �8I�6PlY PAGE 04 Calgen 4 arbon Attenti : Mr.Robert O'Brien I June 25, 2002 I Page 3 The major concern at issue is,whether state law requirements that certain ark must be awarded only to a low bidder preclude the Districts from making he subject award to your company. If such laws apply,the Districts could n(t make an award to Calgon Carbon unless Calgon Cation was determij oil to be the lowest responsible bidder following the present or subsequ int sealed bid process. The California Public Contracts Code contains such res rictive provisions and includes resbnints applicable to the Water District and the anitation Districts. Public Contracts Code Section 21042 provides that the Orange County Mater District must contract for construction of works and structures with the low4 st and best bidder after publication of a bid notice when the work involviu is not to be done by the District itself by force account and the amount involvix is 540,000 or more. Similarly,Public Contracts Code Section 20793 restricts the Sanitation Districts to contracting with the lowest responsible bidder to perfo in work exceeding$35,000 in valuei Public Contracts Code Section 20794 n akes it clear that the work referred to which must be let to the lowest bidder' construction work as to which a bid bond must be furnished. This is in accord rith Section 1101 of the Public Contsaets Code which generally describes the con s which it governs as follows: "'Public Works Contract; as I-"-in this pan,means an agreement r the erection,construction,alor ition,repair,or improvement of any ublic structure,building,road,or other public improvement of any kind." It is important to recognize th competitive bidding is only requinx when specifically mandated by statute. For exampic,in Star Diego Service furhorilyfor Freeway F,mcrgencuw Y. Superior Cowl Q998) 198 Cal. App.3 1466,the court held that a freeway service authority was not required to engage n competitive bidding for the installation of an emergency call box system, nveia that there was no statutory mandate requiring bidding. In that case, the co made the following pertinent stater ent at page 1469: "Absent a statutory requirement,a public entity is not bound to gage in competitive bidding. Thus]to prevail Cubic must establish a slative restraint on Sur Diego SAFE'S ability to contract The tutory scheme providing forthe establishment of service utboritim-does not contain a specif�statutory requirement that service horities engage in competitive bidding in awarding contracts.... 06/26/2002 BB:55 5202299042 DREUY PAGE 05 Calgon n Attemio ' Mr. Robert O'Brien June 25, Z002 Page 4 "Notwithstanding the powerful purposes served by competitive tiding,there is no all pervasive publie policy that requires all public Cities to engage in that practice. Rather,the legislature imposes mpetitive bidding requirements oa public entities within its purview hen the legislature determines it islin the public interest to do so." Similarly,in Construction Induroy Force Account Council v. Delta W Wands(1992)2 Cal.App.4ih 14991 the court considered whether oompeft 've bidding was required for the contracts of reclamation districts. The subject istrict wanted to use its own employees rather than solicit bids. Because the start ory language clearly exempted work performed by the district's own workers the court concluded that competitive bidding was not required. More recently,the court reached the same conclusion and articulaa A the above-quoted language ftornSon Diego Service Aurhorhylor Fremaj Emergencies in Construction lndustry Force Aeeaunt Council v.Amadur Water eney(1999)71 Cal. App. 4i6 8 10. I Based upon the above-cited authorities,it is our opinion that Public Contras Code provisions do not require the project desrnbed in the Specific ions to be awarded to a low bidder because the project does not include constrin Lion of all or part of a facility,works or a structure. in addition,the Specifit uJons do not contemplate competitive bidding on a given design wherein the low 3idder may be determined upon opening of bids. Rather,the Specific tioro contemplate and provide for the following: a. The generation of different designs for equipment to be achieve utilizing different proprictary design features by different bidders; b. The identification of�the low bidder by projecting the intunter taw costs of the proposed equipment over time as well as the quoted price fa designing,fabricating and delivering the equipment;and C. The actual construction work associated with installing the equipm m at the treatment plant to be performed under separate contract. In summary,the Specifications are in the nature of a procurement agreem or concerned with choosing a company to design,fabricate and deliver I 06/26/2002 08:55 5202299002 DREWRY PAGE 06 Calgon arlwn Attentio : W. Robert O'Brien June 25, 002 Page 5 equipm to provide the water treatment sought rather than being a type of public works v ntract which is restricted by Public Contracts Code bid requirements. Accordi gly,state law does not prohibit the Districts from purchasing its treatinct I equipment from Calgon Carbon The Specifications allow for either the award of the contract to the low bids or,rejection of all bids or rejection of any particular proposal if-.At would a t be in the best interests of the District(the Water District)to make an award tc the Proposer." (Specifications,histitretlons to Proposers,Section 18.01A. In Section 18.02 of the Instruction's to Proposers,reasons for disquah ying an apparent low bidder are stated to include conduct and perform moo under other contracts,the Proposer's financial condition,claims or lawstri against it and"other factors." In section 18.02C,the District"...reserves the righ to reject the proposal of my Proposer who does not pass such evaluation to the a satisfaction of the District." In our view,while that language would appear provide broad discretion to the Water District to reject a bid,it also argudl establishes the need to provide sot a criterion for rejecting the low bidder i the bid is awarded to Celgon Carbon in the context of this bid procedure. We hav no information upon which to base'an opinion as to whether the low bidder x ury be rejected on Abe basis of Section 18.02 of the Instructions to Propm rs, However,the Specifications cleirly provide that Also Water District may rej ct a0 bids. We are not aware of any legal cons minis precluding the Water-- istrictmil Sanitation Districts from,lnegotuning a procurement contract with C grin Carbon following a termination of the present process with a rejecti ofallbids.l In summery,we hold the following opinions: 1. No provision of stau',law applicable to the Water District or i the Sur tation Districts requires a contract for the design,fabrication and delivery V of the s bject equipment to be awarded to a!low bidder, 2. The specifications provide broad authority to the Water ' /. Districtreject any particular bid,although the low bidder may successfully V &%aR at no stated disqualifying criterion applies to it;and WeWeWe not had the eryspernairy w review any putclwingordinancewbjcb may have bmn ,h the Wsser District or Smitetion Districts: Al you direction,we could do so in order to rule orr nsuainu which could be contained thennn. We do feel fiat h is doubtful that a mast ' would be found since any Anneurcor m ofmsanent equipment will include"sole aourcc" cuores,including creating a specific design which milires proprieury features. 86/26/2002 09:55 5202299942 DREWRv PAGE 07 Calgon bon Attentio Mr.Robert O'Brien June 25, 002 Page 6 3. The Districts may in any event terminate the present process y rejecting all bids and then negotiate with Calgon Carbon and cootmet for Calg n Carbon's design,fabrication anddebvery of the equipment. Please advise if further information on this subject matter would be useful t you, Very truly yours, RICKARDS, WATSON&GERSHON Jame L Muktaaa JLM:sj cc: Mr. Charles Drewry(facsimile—52, 4229A042) Frmai copies to:emI li 1 ncarbon cal oncarboacom J ssnm � I I i I i I , F ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 4 Phonso June 26, 2002 1714)962-2411 W; 17141962d3M .cawd... The Honorable Senator Dede Alpert me111.0 edam..: Chair, Appropriations Committee P.O.9oll e127 State Senate FwnP.O.3.8 27 9272E-8127 State Capitol, Room 2082 .tract add...: Sacramento, CA 95814 W44 Ellis Avenue wanrsln woes.GA Re: Oppose Assembly Bill 1969 Maddox 9fn=V.1B pp Y (Maddox) Member Dear Senator Alpert: Agencies On behalf of the Orange County Sanitation District(Sanitation District), I urge you, as (Role. Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, to cast a disapproving NO vote on the measure proposed by Assemblyman Ken Maddox that would prevent the '1nBhBi°' Sanitation District from seeking a modified permit under Section 301(h) of the Boons Parka Federal Clean Water Act. Pwrase F°"°tw Massy F.A.w ch The legislature's intervention in this matter is an unnecessary and counterproductive Gordon Grano distraction that steps in the way of well-managed national and state water quality rk"'h"°t°"Bosch knhv„o protection programs that have collectively existed for over 30 years. It is poorly La rear. conceived and should be disapproved. It is bad law. Ls Peons Loa Abm,Tae Nowoort Bosch The bill is bad law because it incorrectly applies a$271 million non-remedy to a$10 Crave million problem. What I mean is this. The bill insists on full secondary treatment as JNatBanco°4he a solution to the bacterial contamination problems along Huntington Beach or SON Beach Newport Beach. Full secondary treatment will cost an estimated$271 million to Stno'1 Tustin construct, take ten years to implement, and will NOT eliminate bacteria from our VIA,Park treated ocean discharge plume. On the other hand, bleach-based disinfection will lbrte Lind° cost less than$10 million to build, will take two months to implement and will counts of orange eliminate any possibility of bacteria from our treated ocean discharge plume of causing problems in Huntington Beach or Newport Beach. I would add that the Basket. District. operating cost for disinfection is a fraction of the cost of full secondary treatment. coots M1 . The bill is bad law because if the Sanitation District decides to achieve full secondary Afdwas ray treatment standards, it must use a particular treatment technology because of this Water District° bill. This will prevent the Sanitation District from using the most appropriate, k ne R ch innovative and cost-effective treatment technologies available now and in the future. This will mean that other environmental resources(air, land, and energy)will be burdened with unnecessary impacts and that rate-payers will be burdened with unnecessary user fees. To maintain world-close leadership in wastewater and water resource management. °a The Honorable Senator Dede Alpert ( June 26, 2002 Page 2 The bill is bad law because it implies that the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the U.S. EPA, in their oversight and review responsibilities, cannot be trusted to make a competent, informed decision about the level of treatment. The Legislature, over 30 years ago, created the Regional Water Quality Control Board system for the express purpose of regulating discharges and protecting the State waters. The bill is bad law because it prejudicially singles out Orange County and ignores San Diego, Goleta, and Morro Bay, local jurisdictions that also possess Clean Water Act Section 301(h) modified ocean discharge permits. One can speculate that if this bill is successful, then the other three agencies will be picked off one at a time. That is not a practice that this state legislature should promote or condone. More to the point, if the legislature, in its wisdom, finds that a modified permit is inappropriate for Orange County, what is the basis for finding otherwise for the cases of San Diego, Goleta and Morro Bay? The fact is there has been no deliberate process whatsoever regarding the question of the other three. Therefore, on its face, AB1969 is prejudicial and therefore unlawful. The bill is bad law because it implies that the 25 members of our board of directors, representing each of the cities, special districts, and unincorporated areas of our service area, are incapable of making an appropriate and informed decision about how to protect public health and the environment on behalf of the citizens of Orange County. The Sanitation District was created by the state legislature for the express purpose of managing wastewater and protecting the environment. The Board of Directors has been effectively doing so for nearly 50 years. The United States EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board have found this to be true as expressed in many ways including awards and continued findings of compliance. It is not necessary to create a bill that overrides the record of the Sanitation District's Board of Directors to consistently achieve the expectations of EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board The bill is bad law because it contradicts the facts and the science of the ocean conditions off Orange County. There is not a single scientific observation that connects the treated discharge plume of the Sanitation District with elevated beach bacterial counts. Science cannot eliminate the possibility of it happening (it's impossible to prove a negative), but the fact is there isn't even one observed event of it happening. The bill is bad law because it is unnecessary. The Sanitation District has already announced that it will begin disinfecting its effluent this summer. Disinfection will once and for all eliminate any possibility of the Sanitation District's discharge plume causing bacterial contamination problems in Orange County. That fact, in and of itself, is all that the legislature and this committee needs to consider. The problem will be solved by disinfection in months. Full secondary treatment, which will take at least ten years to implement, will do nothing to address the bacterial contamination issue. The solution is timely and effective disinfection. F+ The Honorable Senator Dede Alpert June 26, 2002 Page 3 The bill is bad law because the Orange County Sanitation District has consistently met the standards of EPA and the federal Clean Water Act. In 17 years of operating under the permit, Orange County Sanitation District has never been in violation of federal clean water standards, the California Ocean Plan or its permit. The Sanitation District operates an extensive ocean monitoring program, investing more than $2 million a year to make sure the ocean remains safe and healthy for the marine environment and for the public to use for recreation. The monitoring program is part of the ocean wastewater discharge permit issued jointly by the U.S. EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board. According to the EPA, the Orange County monitoring program is a model is an excellent model and it is considering incorporating it into the programs for the other coastal communities, irregardless of whether they hold modified permits or not. The bill is bad law because the Clean Water Act was adopted by Congress after years of scientific research and study. It is uniformly applied across the country, including Orange County and the other California coastal communities. The Clean Water Act specifically provides site-specific standards for a very few uniquely qualifying coastal dischargers as a long-term alternative for water resource protection. Four coastal communities in California have received this unique privilege: Orange County, San Diego, Goleta, and Morro Bay. The bill is bad law because the Sanitation District Board of Directors will make a deliberate determination about this important public policy decision concerning the level of treatment in July. The Board will consider the scientific, technical,financial, regulatory and public opinion issues implied by this multi-faceted environmental issue so important to Orange County. All of the efforts of staff, board, consultants, and the public will be nullified and made moot by this intervention by the state legislature Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of Orange County Sanitation District's major concerns. ZLGuti. BLAKE P. ANDERSON General Manager BPA:jt pwq.ae m„ow,m,w,i n.­�M2 m w.e+ Wlk—im� cc: Senator Jim Baffin, Vice Chair, Senate Appropriations Committee Members of the Senate Appropriations Committee Mr. Norm Eckenrode, Chair, OCSD Board of Directors Members of the OCSD Board of Directors R � o I RE: Agenda Item No. 17(c) UV Disinfection Equipment Selection Process Summary July 30, 2001 —JCC directed staff on pre-selection of UV equipment based on a performance specification. October 8, 17, and 24—Approvals by JCC, OCWD and OCSD Boards were made to issue RFP for UV equipment pre-selection. March 11, 2002—JCC approved and recommended to the Boards of OCWD and OCSD that Trojan be selected to provide UV disinfection equipment based on lowest life cycle cost analysis. Both Boards deferred the item back to staff. OCSD Board requested staff to address a letter issued by Calgon dated March 1, 2002. A response letter dated April 9 was issued by OCWD to address Calgon's concerns. The letter addressed consistency with current equipment installed at OCWD, technical and economic factors regarding the Irfe cycle cost analysis, and financial stability of both Trojan and Calgon. April 22, 2002—Staff presented an update on the UV equipment to the JCC with no actions being taken. The update presented the response letter dated April 9 to Calgon. Staff also distributed a letter received that day from Loretta Sanchez regarding the "Buy American' issue. OCWD Board approved the equipment award to Trojan on May 15, 2002. May 22, 2002, the OCSD Steering Committee recommended that the award of a contract to Trojan Technologies be referred back to the JCC. This item is before the Board this month with the attached additional information which includes a summary of issues of concern, a financial statement for Trojan Technologies for the period ending May 31, 2002, and a letter from Trojan addressing their American presence and use of American made products. Summary of Pertinent Issues on Pre-Selection of Trojan Technologies 5 "Buy American" Issues • The "Buy American" provision in the Federal regulations (40 CFR, 35-936-13.d) indicates that domestic equipment may be used in preference to non-domestic equipment if the cost difference is no more than 6%, and a greater differential is deemed unreasonable; Calgon's equipment cost is 24% greater than Trojan's costs. • Over 70%of Trojan's projects are located in the United States and Trojan has offices in Atlanta, Tucson, and California. (Trojan pays state taxes in these three states.) • Over 50% of all equipment to be supplied by Trojan for the GWR System is of American origin. ' Engineering, final testing, and system fabrication are the major items performed in Canada. • The UV portion of the GWR System equipment is only 13% of the total as compared to MF (33%) and RO (54%). All RO manufacturers qualified to supply equipment to the GWR System are based in the United States. Financial Viability • Trojan's second quarter revenue was $22.7 million (net Income of$1.1 million)and third quarter revenue was $25.2 million (net income of$1.2 million). • Trojan has a backlog of$40 million not including the GWR System project. • Trojan has retired all short-term indebtedness and has a positive cash flow. • Trojan has successfully met all bonding requirements delineated in the contract documents. • Trojan has recently been selected by the City of Seattle for a 180 mgd drinking water UV disinfection system (the largest in the world). • The Water Replenishment District has recently selected Trojan for the Alamitos Barrier Project(3 mgd), which involves the use of MF and RO on tertiary effluent as pretreatment to UV for NDMA destruction. Contractual Issues • The Trojan proposal was deemed to be responsible and responsive by staff and met all criteria required in the specifications. • Staff recommendation is to award to the lowest, responsible proposer Trojan Technologies. • The pre-selection and design of the GWR System UV process is on the critical path in order to finish final design and meet OCSD wet weather flow requirements. • Staff expert opinion prefers the Trojan system to the Calgon system. • Trojan is only due $250,000($125,000 OCSD share)for design and due no other money until construction. ($250,000 design cost is 11120 of total project design cost of$30 million) • The Trojan UV system requires 983,000 Kw-hr per year less power to operate than the Calgon system. • OCWD board of directors approved the selection of Trojan at their May 15, 2002 meeting. JUN-25-02 10:54 From:TROJAN TECHNOLOGIES 5194573030 T-003 P-01 Job-II2 rmsv TrojanTachnslagfas Inc. 25 worn Leader In M Obnle4eon S/61Yna N? June 24, 2002 FAX—714478-3373 Mr. William R. Everest, P.E. Associate General Manager Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Everest: Thank you for our meeting of June 19, 2002, which afforded the opportunity to discuss Trojan's involvement in the Orange County Groundwater Replenishment System Project. As indicated during the meeting, Trojan considers this to be an extremely Important project, and looks forward to working with Orange County Water District over the coming months. As discussed during our meeting, I am forwarding herewith copies of Trojan's financial results for the period ending May 31, 2002. These results show strong growth in Trojan's UV business, overall continued profitable performance and a very strong Balance Sheet. I believe these results strongly confirm Trojan's financial ability to successfully execute on the Orange County GWRS Project. As also discussed, Trojan has had nearly 25 years of successful municipal project activity cross America. Over 70% of Trojan's projects are installed In the United States. To support our activities in America, Trojan has offices in Atlanta and Tucson, and has Engineering staff located in California. Trojan pays state taxes in these regions We will soon be locating a Trojan Service Technician in Southern California in order to be able to provide 24/7 service to our growing installed customer base. Finally, as mentioned during our meeting. Trojan expects that the total U.S. content on the Orange County GWRS project will be a minimum of 50%. Many of our critical components are manufactured and sourced in the USA. Trojan has also extensively used the expertise and experience of our American experts to design, test and validate the equipment proposed for the Orange County GWRS project. It is Trojan's intent to maximize the US content on this project. I trust this information is satisfactory, and if you need to call please do so. Yours truly, TROJAN TECHNOLOGI S INC. � oa..q- Allan Bulckaert, President & CEO AB:jw -Attachments ------ 3020 Gore 0oad,London,Oniano.Ganda N5V 47 •Telephone:151B14G7.3400•Fax:(5191 45 7-303U•...volanuv.eom U— ) 06/24/2002 10:03 19494/L0443 OCaC PAGE 02 ORAu®eCOUNT* IL a klMan,swre 100•11NRF.CFhfornh 9261459a4 "�"•. r. w•r,.•.,e.,...,..o........:....—ter• RS1SMSS COUNCK phone 949.476.2242•h¢90.476.9240•Rwiw ..ock cog — CoPy �-o 'Dr12a<crwe� �llv>r At4t�pA- PA�G`� a¢am WXRI TEE June 21, 2002 _ cmPY -f-6 %Co rT BAv41f C)PPt�45 m°�'e01®°'+^•�' The Honorable Ken Maddox State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 - R Re: AB 1969 (Maddox) emxa nmc�aa°1"®' . Dear Assemblyman Maddox: :wtr�„rw,r nwiw.uous, The Orange County Business Council (Business CouncillOCBC), a R.• countywide organization of business lead re and companies throughout Orange County, is dedicated to Orange ounty's economic vitality and ax.mcu q quality of life. We share your concern ova the beach closures and beach LSt 3d 6t .,::postings, that have occurred along the 0 nge County coastline. These closures and postings adversely affect Orange Founty's quality of life as ram r well as its economic prosperity. At the same time, the Business Council is concerned over your AB 1969 as currently written because we believe it could undermine efforts to adopt the best sralutions possible. The Orange County Sanitation District (OPSD), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board must be empowered to determine the best and most cost effective treatment attematives for meeting Wean water standards, thereby protecting the surf zone from bactetja an(! viruses. The essence of the,Business Council's concerns over AB 1r969 ie that the bill, as currently . Ye;riy, wr'Itten, •unreasonably constrains them from doing so. By predetermining their decision on treatment options, the, me�sure contributes to the - ;P' politicization of the matter and, more signifimntlyF diminishes the likelihood that decisions will be based upon sound science and economics. it is quite _..NyF. possible under this scenario that residents and, business owners will be asked to bear costs and take actions thatido not solve the problem. As M�IDIR, such,AB 1969 jeopardizes the credibility of the regulatory process. - wRm:� ov The Business Council's specific concerns Y ith AB 1969 are therefore two- ? ° fold: .. 1.-AB--1969 interjects the legislature into E I locevstate regulatory process that is well underway and working a i intended to protect coastal ""w^ "• resources; - .M luau +'�o fMA�rNOMfANOF 4OYNfY"6 ECONOMIC FUTURE 06/24/2002 10:03 19494760443 OCBC PAGE 03 ` The Honorable Ken Maddox _ June 21, 2002 Page 2 of 2 2. AB 1969 has the potential to precl a the selection of the best treatment alternative. We note that in some respects the con rns of the Business Council closely parallel those of the State Waterl Quality Control Board, which opposes AB 1969. Your consideration of these concems as you continue to move AB 1969 will be much appreciated.) We look forward to continuing our dialog v ith you on this important issue and thank you for your anticipated consideration of our comments. ^�` • - - Sincerely, - Stan Oftelie Julia Puentes President& CEO Ex cutive V.P. Public Affairs cc: " Orange County legislative delegatioh- "- Stale Water Resources Control Board Regional Water Quality Control Poar "• -Orange County Sanitation District sI California Chamber of Commerce ✓Mike Gotch, Secretary, Legislative Al' irs—Office of the Govemor .A J I l .kuFGG41W4.1om-0ppfsp lGW.4w California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region Dt July 19,2002 ITEM: SUBJECT: Amendment to Order No. 98-5, NPDES No. CA0110604, Waste Discharge Acquirements, Orange County Water District, Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No. 2, Orange County - Order No. 118-2002-0055 DISCUSSION: Summary On March 6, 1998, the Board adopted Order No. 98-5 and on May 6, 1998, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 signed the NPDES permit No. CA0110604, renewing the waste discharge requirements for Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) ocean outfall discharge. Receiving water monitoring data indicate that the discharge has consistently complied with the bacterial limitations contained in Order No. 98-5, which were established to protect both nearshore and offshore waters[. However, the data also indicate that the discharge plume has, on occasion, traveled closer to shore than predicted. Therefore, the discharge may pose a threat to water contact recreational uses. Regional Board staff recommends that Order No. 98-5 be amended to include disinfection requirements to address this threat. EPA agrees with this recommendation. The proposed amendment requires OCSD to implement disinfection facilities using sodium hypochlorite (chlorine bleach) and to dechlorinate using sodium bisulfite, since disinfection/dechlorination in this manner can be implemented most readily in the short-term. OCSD has not objected to the disinfection of the wastewater in this manner. OCSD is conducting an investigation of alternative long-term disinfection methods, which may lead to future modification of the disinfection requirements. In conjunction with incorporating chlorine disinfection requirements, it is necessary to amend the Order to specify limitations on chlorine residual. Further, since Order No. 98-5 was adopted, revisions to the acute toxicity limits and tests specified in the California Ocean Plan have occurred. The acute toxicity limits and test requirements specified in Order No. 98-5 implement the prior Ocean Plan and must be revised. If approved,this amendment to Order No. 98-5 would take effect on August 12,2002,consistent with the schedule for completion and operational start- up of the disinfection facilities. Nearshore waters are within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet form the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline. Offshore waters are between the nearshore waters and the limit of ocean waters of the State (i.e., throe miles from the shoreline.) Staff Report Page 2 of 5 y Order No.R8-2002.0055,Amending Order No. 98-5 r . Orange County Sanitation Datrict Reclamation Plain No. 1 and Treatment Plain No.2 Disinfeetion/Chlerine Residual Order No. 98-5 contains receiving water limits designed to protect the health of people who come in contact with ocean waters that may be affected by the OCSD effluent discharge. These limits implement the bacterial water-contact objectives specified in the 1997 California Ocean Plan,which was in effect at the time Order No. 98-5 was adopted. Specifically,Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. requires that certain total and fecal coliform bacterial objectives shall be maintained within the nearshore zone and within the offshore zone to a depth of 10 feet to protect the water contact recreational use of those waters. The requirement to maintain the objectives to the 10-foot depth in offshore waters was based on the Regional Board's finding that it is the surface waters of the offshore zone to a depth of 10 feet that are used for water contact recreation'. Due to the location of the outfall (at 55 m depth and approximately 82 km (5.1 miles) offshore of the Huntington Beach area,just north of the Santa Ana River) and the ocean characteristics around the outfall, disinfection of the wastewater has not been necessary to maintain compliance with these objectives. In recent years, the waters off Huntington Beach have been plagued periodically with high concentrations of bacteria that have resulted in the posting and closure of the beaches to water- contact recreation. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the source(s) of the problem. To date, none of these studies has directly linked the problem to OCSD's wastewater discharge. However, recent monitoring work conducted by OCSD has detected low levels of total coliform bacteria, related to the discharge plume, at the surface at a sampling station about three miles from shore. The results also showed plume-related bacteria within one half mile of shore in the deep waters of a submarine canyon (Newport Canyon). Although neither the limitations in Order No. 98-5 nor the A.B. 411 bacterial standards for beach waters' were exceeded, Board staff believes that, based on these recent findings, it is prudent to require the disinfection of the wastewater, and to modify the bacterial limits contained in Order No. 98-5 to ensure that water-contact recreational activities in both offshore and nearshore ocean waters are not threatened by this discharge.This proposed amendment would require the implementation of disinfection facilities using sodium hypochlorite (chlorine bleach) and dechlorination facilities using sodium bisulfite, since disinfection/dechlorinstion in this manner can be most readily implemented in the short-term. Further, this proposed amendment would revise Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. to require that the bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column in the offshore zone,rather than in only the top ten feet. OCSD has not objected to the proposed disinfection requirements. Temporary chlorination/dechlorination facilities are expected to be operational by August 12, 2002. OCSD is conducting an evaluation of alternative, long-term disinfection strategies. The temporary chlorination/dechlorination facilities may eventually be supplanted by a more permanent solution,which may include use of an alternative disinfection agent. Revision of the disinfection requirements can be considered in the future, if warranted by the results of OCSD's investigations. r The Ocean Plan stipulates that the bacterial objectives apply to the nearshore zone and to those areas outside that zone used for water contact sports,as determined by the Regional Board. t These standards include total and fecal coliform, as well as enterococcus, another type of bacterial indicator. The Ocean Plan and AB 411 standards for total and fecal coliforrn are very similar. Staf/'Report Page 3 of 3 • Order No.RS-2002.0035,Amending Order No. 98-3 Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant No. I and 2Yeatment Plant No.2 OCSD's stated operational goal with the disinfection process is to achieve both the Ocean Plan bacterial objectives (as reflected in Order No. 98-5) and the A.B. 411 bacterial standards at the boundary of the Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID)of the discharge. The ZID is approximately a 60- meter radius around the outfall. In light of this, while the proposed amendment would require that compliance with bacterial objectives be achieved throughout the nearshore and offshore zones, it may be appropriate in the future to consider extending the zone of compliance beyond the limit of offshore waters, perhaps to the ZID. To provide data needed to make this determination, this amendment would require the discharger to submit a proposal for an appropriate investigation. The discharger would be required to implement the investigation upon the Executive Officer's approval. It may be noted that this investigation would be expected to include analyses for enterococcus as well as total and fecal coliform so that conformance with A.B. 411 standards can also be evaluated . These data will be considered in the upcoming renewal of Order No. 98-5, which is expected to be considered in 2003, and may result in a revision of the area in which compliance with bacterial objectives is to be achieved. Wastewater disinfection with chlorine usually produces a chlorine residual. Chlorine and its reaction products are toxic to aquatic life. Since disinfection with chlorine was not contemplated at the time Order No. 98-5 was issued, the permit does not contain any limits on the amount of chlorine residual that may be in the effluent. In conjunction with the amendment of Order No. 98-5 to include requirements for disinfection using chlorine , Order No. 98-5 must be amended to add chlorine residual limits. The California Ocean Plan contains receiving water limits for chlorine residual for the protection of marine aquatic life. The proposed amendment would incorporate effluent limits into Order No. 98-5 that are based on these Ocean Plan water quality objectives. Acute Toxicity Order No. 98-5 contains effluent limits and testing requirements for acute toxicity that are based on the 1997 Ocean Plan, which was in effect at the time of permit adoption. The 1997 Ocean Plan specified the use of freshwater test organisms to determine compliance with acute toxicity limits. 4 The proposed amendment does not require compliance with the A.B. 411 standards, but instead relies on the bacterial objectives in the Ocean Plan. The Ocean Plan may be revised in the future to include enterocaccus objectives; in that case, further amendment of the Order would be necessary. There are also practical considerations that make it unreasonable to impose etterococcus limits at this time. Given holding time considerations, an alternative to the approved standard method would have to he utilized for the numerous samples collected offshore. The use of this alternative method is appropriate far research investigations but not for compliance purposes. Smf/Report Page 4 of 5 Order No.R8-2002-0055,Amending Order No. 98-5 st Orange Cosm y Sanitation District Reciomation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No.2 The Ocean Plan has been revised since Order No. 98-5 was adopted. The current version of the Ocean Plan became effective on December 3, 2001 (2001 Ocean Plan). The new Ocean Plan revised the procedures to develop acute toxicity limits in permits and changed the testing protocols for determining compliance with those limits. Acute toxicity effluent limits are now to be based on the acute toxicity water quality objective that is specified in the Ocean Plan. In addition,the Ocean Plan now requires the use of marine test species instead of freshwater species when measuring compliance. The proposed amendment would revise the acute toxicity effluent limits and testing procedures in Order No. 98-5 to conform to those specified in the 2001 Ocean Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Order No. R8-2002-0055,as presented. Comments were solicited from the following agencies: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Permits Issuance Section(WTR-5)-Terry Oda U.S.Army District,Los Angeles,Corps of Engineers,Regulatory Branch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Carlsbad State Water Resources Control Board,Office of the Chief Counsel—Jorge Leon State Water Resources Control Board,Division of Water Quality -James Maughan State Department of Health Services,Carpenteria—John Curphey State Department of Health Services,Carpenteria-Jeff Stone State Department of Water Resources- Glendale State Department of Fish and Game-Long Beach Orange County Water District-Nita Yamachika Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority -Joseph Grindstaff Surfrider Foundation,Huntington/Long Beach Chapter Orange County Coastkeeper- Garry Brown Lawyers for Clean Water C/c San Francisco Baykeeper Dr.Jack Skinner - City of Anaheim City of Brea City of Buena Park Costa Mesa Sanitary District City of Cypress City of Fountain Valley City of Fullerton City of Garden Grove City of Huntington Beach Irvine Ranch Water District City of La Habra City of La Palma Order No.R8-2002-0055,NPDES No. CA0110604 Page 9 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No.I and Treatment Plant No.2 I, Gerard J. Thibeault, Executive Officer, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of Order No. R8-2002-0055 adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region,on July 19, 2002. Gerard J. Thibeault Executive Officer California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region I, Alexis Strauss, Director, do hereby certify that the foregoing is'a full, true, and correct copy of modifications to NPDES Permit No. CA0110604 adopted by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region DC, on July 19, 2002. Alexis Strauss,Director Water Division U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX May 28,2002 PAC2 Workshop 95 Alternative Evaluation Table Comments and Questions. 1. Alternative treatment D,employing microfiltmtion technology following advanced secondary treatment was not an option that was ever under consideration during the 1999 strategic plan,or the ORS project technical planning phase.Why is the OCSD staff choosing to place this alternative on the table now? 2. How many other POTW's are using this technology?How many in Southern California are using this technology or considering using it?Why don't we have other partners to help us finance the development of this R&D project(San Diego,Golita)? 3. Total Coliform Levels Q,000(Public Health column)assumes that the chemical disinfection(chlorine) bench scale testing that OCSD is currently conducting is successful in demonstrating both to the County Health Care Agency,and the Regional Water Quality Control Board that such a procedure is protective of both marine life and public health.Additionally,an EIFUEIS should be generated,and public comment solicited before any commitment to this alternative is made.Contrary to what the public has been led to believe by premature and inaccurate press releases,OCSD does NOT have the unilateral authority to use this technology. 4. If the retention time in the OCSD treatment system is insufficient for chemical(chlorine) disinfection,and de-chlorination,then additional structures must be constructed in order to use this technology.The cost impact,particularly for alternatives A&B,is not insignificant,and is not reflected in the"cost effectiveness"tables? 5. The projected TSS(Water Quality)for alternative B(50/50 blend)is 39mg/L?presently it is about 51 mg/L.at a 50/50 blend.How is OCSD planning to achieve a 20% improvement in advanced primary suspended solids removal efficiency?How long will it take to achieve this goal?How much will it cost? 6. Virus levels(public health)are estimated from the 1999 strategic plan.Can't we get more recent supporting data for these values from the bench scale tests? 7. Energy costs at OCSD are currently$0.037 per KWHr.The average home owner pays about$0.08 per KWHr.The energy use cost in terms of equivalent homes is therefore less than one-half of that indicated in the Environmental Impacts table("Equivalent Homes").There are approx. 1,000,000 equivalent units(homes)in the district.Thus,the energy usage cost impact to the ratepayer for any of the alternatives is about one percent. 8. The current OCSD NPDES permit with the 301(h)waiver allows a suspended solids mass emission rate of 20,000 metric tons per year with a re-opener provision to allow them to go to 30,000 metric tons per year.The present suspended solids emission rate at OCSD is about 17,000 metric tons per year,and has been relatively stable at this value for the past several years.This permit limit represents an increase of 18%and 75% respectively.Conversly,the relative impact on county landfill capacity and basin air quality(VOC emissions)with respect to the assimilative capacity of land and air resources for any of the other alternatives is less than 1%.The tables included in the summary statement comparing the alternatives as"lower or higher"or"more or less"are not quantified.Any decision based on this table alone would be a gross error ofjudgment. 9. There is a real problem in understanding how the`fair rate policies-recommended by the rate advisory committee is being implemented at the District.For example,why is the GWRS considered a"water supply far existing users"when,in fact it is required because of the rapid growth of population of'new users"in North Orange County?Why are Inge developers allowed to buy in to our"Publicly Owned Treatment Works"at substantially less than the fair market value,or replacement cost of the Districts facilities? Why are large entertainment users given a discount from a policy that is supposed to charge according to"Bow and strength"?Out of what budget does the expense for a political lobbyist for OCSD staff come from?(ratepayers or connection fees?). 10. As one of the Board members has recently stated,`the Sanitation District issues are much to complicated for the average citizen to understand."It is also far too complex and important of an issue to leave to a Board of Directors who do not have the technical, legal or financial backround to make an informed decision on these issues. 11. The CDM staff,and OCSD representatives at these workshops should be commended for attempting to reduce these issues in a few pages of text in a language that our Board of Directors can understand. Doz Member OCSD PAC2 CC:Nomt Eckenrode C:l 61 Surfrider Foundation Huntington /Seal Beach Chapter P.O. Box 878 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 June 27, 2002 Ms. Lisa Murphy Communications Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Dear Lisa: Thank you for the opportunity to participate to the Orange County Sanitation District's Board of Directors meeting of June 26. We would like to thank Mr. Anderson,and the Directors for their decision to extend the"Public Comments"section of the meeting. This extension allowed nearly eighty people to offer their personal recommendations to the Board regarding the July 17 vote on the 301(h)waiver issue. We look forward to learning more about the Sanitation District's update to the Interim Strategic Plan on July 17. Respectfully eel'121�� Jun-28-02 03:17= Frog-City of Anahaim/Ci ty Mar 714 705 51 T-951 Orin l/nn1 F-518 nM on y,��er yr yAgNK FELDI 5.Meyer Pm Teo e •('e TOM TW.Couno Maher V/ Slfllt yMCCM kCo lMaher CITY OF ANAIJEW,CALII01I141A LUaLLE KRINO rgenN hunter Office of the Mayor and City cimmil •eeaoeo`° June 26,2002 Members of the Board Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 SUBJECT: CHAIRMAN SELECTION Dear Honorable Board Members: 1 am seeking your support for election as the Chairman of the oinge County Sanitation District (OCSD), Currently I serve as the Vice Chairman and attend and participte in all committee meetings. Shs ef£ords me the opportunity to have an overall understandiA of the numerous issues the OCSD kutes. I served on the Finance,Administration and Hunan Resources Committee PAM for three years and was chairman during the past year. * OCSD experience,coupled with my other leadership responsibilities, which include serving as Chair of the League of California Cities Housing, Communiffil and Economic Development Policy Committee,board member of the Orange County Transportation Authority,and three years as Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of Anaheim,has well prepared me to serve as the Chairman of the Orange County Sanitation District- Orange County and the Orange County Sanitation District facelmany challenges in the coining year. Issues ranging from the recently released State Budget May revise,the Groundwater Replenishment System, urban runoff,degree of treatment of effluent,and balancing fiscal constratms are just a few to be addressed. I'm offering my leadership skills to assist OCSD in addressing these challenges in 2002-03. Should Wu wish to discuss my candidacy further,please feel-free to call me at(714)765-5247. I hope I can count on your vote for the Chairman of the Orange County Sanitation District. Sincerely, Shrrley McCracken Council Member 200 SmAh Anaheim Boulevard,Anaheim,Cafamia 92805 (714)765-5247 • FAX(714)7665184 • wy mmhmm net 6/26/02 OPPOSITION TO RENEWAL OF D. Nolta ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (OCSD) 'S 301(h) Permit/Waiver • OPPOSED TO OCSD WAIVER THAT ALLOWS DUMPING BACTERIA, VIRUSES AND BIOSOLIDS 4 1/2 MILES OFFSHORE IN FEDERAL PACIFIC OCEAN WATERS. - DEFINITION OF SECONDARY TREATMENT: A STANDARD FOR REMOVAL OF TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS AND BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND. • SICK AND DEAD MARINE LIFE DUE TO NEUROLOGICAL SICKNESS: SEABIRDS, PELICANS, AND DOLPHINS, SEAL LIONS. - OCSD 2001 ONSHORE INVESTIGATION REPORT: BEACH OBSERVATION: "More dead seals were being washed onto the beach than previously thought, although they did not appear to increase the bacteria counts in the surfzone because of how they were disposed by beach officials. " - CAUSE: DOMOIC ACID, A NEUROTOXIN PRODUCED BY TOXIC MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON (SEA ALGAE, DIATOM) . • PROLIFERATION OF TOXIC PHYTOPLANKTON: HARMFUL ALGAE BLOOMS (RAB) . - POLLUTION: COASTAL WATER NUTRIENT INPUTS, STIMULATE (FERTILIZE) NABS. • 1954 PAPER "THE ECOLOGY OF PHYTOPLANKTON BLOOMS. . . . . " BY JOHN H. RYTHER. - REPORTED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DUCK WASTE PRODUCTS ENTERING EAST COAST BAYS, ENRICHING THE SEA WATER AND DEVELOPMENT OF PLANKTON BLOOMS. • COASTAL WATER EUTROPHICATION: NUTRIENT LOADING (NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS) OF OCEAN WATER CAUSED BY DISCHARGE OF PARTIALLY TREATED WASTEWATER FROM THE OCSD OUTFALL PIPE. • OCSD WAIVER ALLOWS FOR A VARIANCE FOR DISCHARGED CONSTITUENTS: BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND AND SUSPENDED SOLIDS. • OCSD OUTFALL PIPE METAL EFFLUENTS: IRON, COPPER, ETC. : GROWTH OF ALGAE. • TOXIC PHYTOPLANKTON BLOOMS CONSEQUENCES ON HUMANS. - BIOTOXINS PASS THROUGH THE OCEAN'S FOOD CHAIN TO HUMANS. - STATE OF CALIFORNIA; PHYTOPLANKTON MONITORING PROGRAM. - HUMAN SICKNESS (NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS) . -- AMNESIC SHELLFISH POISONING (DIATOM) ; DIARRHETIC SHELLFISH POISONING AND PARALYTIC SHELLFISH POISONING (DINOFLAGELLATE) . - ECONOMIC: DESTRUCTION OF THE SEAFOOD, OCEAN TOURIST AND RECREATIONAL INDUSTRIES IN CALIFORNIA. • OCSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS: VOTE NO ON THE OCSD RENEWAL OF 301 (h) PERMIT. - SAY NO TO OCSD BEING A PACIFIC OCEAN GARDENER USING BIOSOLIDS FERTILIZER. Page 1 of 2 `N e-�02 ws Domoic Acid Poisoning of Marine Mammals in California Links from our veterinarian, Dr. Richard Evans, DVM and the International Society for Infectious Diseases: DOLPHIN DIE-OFF, DOMOIC ACID?-USA(CALIFORNIA), Source:AP nline, arc DOLPHIN DIE-OFF, DOMOIC ACID?-USA(CALIFORNIA), Source: r. Richard vans, , �r2�� DOLPHIN/SEA LION DIE-OFF, DOMOIC ACID -USA(CA), ource: a range ounty Te gis—te—r,0 Apr DOLPHIN/SEA LION DIE-OFF, DOMOIC ACID -USA(CA), Source: Dr. vat, MS', '£3 Apm 20022— 1: r� 1 http://www.fst=c.org/news_txt.html 51'8 0? Page 2 of 2 s Friends of the Sea Lion Marine Mammal Center 20612 Laguna Canyon Road Laguna Beach, California, USA 92651 (949)494-3050 phone • (949)494-2802 fax info@fslmmc.org This site produced by Job Job Interactive hup:':wwe-.fslmmc.orgrnews_ixt.hnnl 5'8,U2 June 26, 2002 To: Board of Directors, OCSD Fro: Randy T. Fuhrman Re: Legacy Vote What legacy do we want to leave for our fixture generations? What effects on our environment do we want to produce? What level of treatment will the effluent receive? What do we want to leave behind? Next month the Board will decide the direction of OCSD. This is an opportunity that seldom comes along. There are many analogies - every journey begins with the first step, we are at a crossroads, and various others. You could serve on this Board for quite some time and not have the opportunity that you have this year. When deciding whether to treat all the sewage to full secondary levels one always asks - what are the benefits, what will it cost, what are the ramifications, what good will this serve? In essence, why do this? You have many factors to balance. For me, the answer is that we open up the possibilities for a multitude of options while making the ocean somewhat cleaner. Nothing changes today, but by taking this first step, you change our tomorrows and many alternatives become available. Reclamation - easier. Options for effluent disposal become more numerous after all the sewage is secondarily treated. Disinfection - easier. Pathogen removal can be done using UV light rather than chemicals. Full secondary will cost money and use other resources. The money is $16.00/year over time, even less if we use technologies such as trickling filters and financial methods such as adjusting rates sooner to avoid borrowing so much money which means less cost overall. But, nothing comes for free and some price must be paid. We can minimize those consequences. For example, the biosolids can be dealt with more efficiently by using centrifuges rather than the old belt presses, thereby hauling less water and using fewer trucks. Trickling filters use less energy and produce less biosolids. Create a marketable Class A biosolid program for reuse. The fixture is at our doorstep and you get to decide the direction we take. By moving in a positive direction we all benefit. We also pass on a world of opportunities to the future generations. Thank you and take care, RE: Acienda Item No. 17(c) UV Disinfection Equipment Selection Process Summary July 30, 2001 —JCC directed staff on pre-selection of UV equipment based on a performance specification. October 8, 17, and 24—Approvals by JCC, OCWD and OCSD Boards were made to issue RFP for UV equipment pre-selection. March 11, 2002 —JCC approved and recommended to the Boards of OCWD and OCSD that Trojan be selected to provide UV disinfection equipment based on lowest life cycle cost analysis. Both Boards deferred the item back to staff. OCSD Board requested staff to address a letter issued by Calgon dated March 1, 2002. A response letter dated April 9 was issued by OCWD to address Calgon's concerns. The letter addressed consistency with current equipment installed at OCWD, technical and economic factors regarding the life cycle cost analysis, and financial stability of both Trojan and Calgon. April 22, 2002 — Staff presented an update on the UV equipment to the JCC with no actions being taken. The update presented the response letter dated April 9 to Calgon. Staff also distributed a letter received that day from Loretta Sanchez regarding the "Buy American" issue. OCWD Board approved the equipment award to Trojan on May 15, 2002. May 22, 2002, the OCSD Steering Committee recommended that the award of a contract to Trojan Technologies be referred back to the JCC. This item is before the Board this month with the attached additional information which includes a summary of issues of concern, a financial statement for Trojan Technologies for the period ending May 31, 2002, and a letter from Trojan addressing their American presence and use of American made products. ` Summary of Pertinent Issues on Pre-Selection of Trojan Technologies "Buy American" Issues • The"Buy American" provision in the Federal regulations (40 CFR, 35-936-13.d) indicates that domestic equipment may be used in preference to non-domestic equipment if the cost difference is no more than 6%, and a greater differential is deemed unreasonable; Calgon's equipment cost is 24% greater than Trojan's costs. • Over 70%of Trojan's projects are located in the United States and Trojan has offices in Atlanta, Tucson, and California. (Trojan pays state taxes in these three states.) • Over 50% of all equipment to be supplied by Trojan for the GWR System is of American origin. Engineering, final testing, and system fabrication are the major items performed in Canada. • The UV portion of the GWR System equipment is only 13% of the total as compared to MF (33%) and RO (54%). All RO manufacturers qualified to supply equipment to the GWR System are based in the United States. Financial Viability • Trojan's second quarter revenue was $22.7 million (net income of$1.1 million) and third quarter revenue was $25.2 million (net income of$1.2 million). • Trojan has a backlog of$40 million not including the GWR System project. • Trojan has retired all short-term indebtedness and has a positive cash flow. • Trojan has successfully met all bonding requirements delineated in the contract documents. • Trojan has recently been selected by the City of Seattle for a 180 mgd drinking water UV disinfection system (the largest in the world). • The Water Replenishment District has recently selected Trojan for the Alamitos Barrier Project (3 mgd), which involves the use of MF and RO on tertiary effluent as pretreatment to UV for NDMA destruction. Contractual Issues • The Trojan proposal was deemed to be responsible and responsive by staff and met all criteria required in the specifications. • Staff recommendation is to award to the lowest, responsible proposer Trojan Technologies. • The pre-selection and design of the GWR System UV process is on the critical path in order to finish final design and meet OCSD wet weather flow requirements. • Staff expert opinion prefers the Trojan system to the Calgon system. • Trojan is only due $250,000 ($125,000 OCSD share)for design and due no other money until construction. ($250,000 design cost is 1/120 of total project design cost of$30 million) • The Trojan UV system requires 983,000 Kw-hr per year less power to operate than the Calgon system. • OCWD board of directors approved the selection of Trojan at their May 15, 2002 meeting. JUN-25-Ot 10:54 From:TROJAN TECHNOLOGIES 51945T3030 T-003 P.01 Job-ZIZ 1 � mnam7 ' Trojan Thchnologloe Inc. Wood Leader In IN DhhIWc Syewnc June 24, 2002 FAX—714-378.3373 Mr. William R. Everest, P.E. Associate General Manager Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Everest: Thank you for our meeting of June 19. 2002, which afforded the opportunity to discuss Trojan's involvement In the Orange County Groundwater Replenishment System Project. As indicated during the meeting, Trojan considers this to be an extremely Important project, and looks forward to working with Orange County Water District over the coming months. As discussed during our meeting, I am forwarding herewith copies of Trojan's financial results for the period ending May 31, 2002. These results show strong growth in Trojan's UV business, overall continued profitable performance and a very strong Balance Sheet. I believe these results strongly confirm Trojan's financial ability to successfully execute on the Orange County GWRS Project. As also discussed, Trojan has had nearly 25 years of successful municipal project activity cross America. Over 70% of Trojan's projects are Installed In the United States. To support our activities in America, Trojan has offices in Atlanta and Tucson, and has Engineering staff located in California. Trojan pays state taxes in these regions We will soon be locating a Trojan Service Technician in Southern California in order to be able to provide 24/7 service to our growing installed customer base. Finally, as mentioned during our meeting. Trojan expects that the total U.S. content on the Orange County GWRS project will be a minimum of 50%. Many of our critical components are manufactured and sourced in the USA. Trojan has also extensively used the expertise and experience of our American experts to design, test and validate the equipment proposed for the Orange County GWRS project. It is Trojan's intent to maximize the US content on this project. I trust this information is satisfactory, and if you need to call please do so. Yours truly, TROJAN TECHNOLOGIES INC. Allan Bulckaert, President & CEO AB:jw -Attachments _....__ (tea 3020 Oorm Road.Landon.Ontario.Canada N5V 4T7 •Teleonone:1519I 467-3400 •Fax:(519)457-3030•www.trolsnuv.com Q. 'j r 06/24/2382 10:03 19494760443 10(39L PAGE 02 _ CRANSECOYNTC 2PulcPun,Sdre'00*rrvtu,cdhmia 9E6t4-5904 ��� v.ar- .e.•s--s•��-ww.-......:.n,.�..®..- 2TilSENE3S COUNCIL phone 949.476.2242•fa:949.476,9240•adr w oclwmg — cop,I Tb p I It£C73°es V tr4 Alec=ADA- PheZ4U`1 erecomamroa® June21, 2002 _ Cop\i 7-a SCorr-BA-Vr L " v I dr (=A* ° 0�4^•� The Honorable Ken Maddox State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: AB 1969 (Maddox) aa+owc { Dear Assemblyman Maddox: .DNfnuhbq " nw The Orange County Business Council Business CounciUOCBC), a 4L• r MM countywide organization of business lead rs and companies throughout o Orange County, is dedicated to Orange ounty's economic vitality and 4�cv4$eouba:4'D, 'quality of life. We share your concern owe the beach closures and beach BUSLNLPW ,,i.postings that have occurred along the Or4nge County coastline. These �"^etle1n •°i° closures and postings adversely affect OraInge Founty's quality of life as rmm�w, well as its economic prosperity. At the some time, the Business Council is J. concerned over your AB 1969 as currently written because we believe it could undermine efforts to adopt the best sglutions possible. a.mem The Orange County Sanitation District (OPSD)land the Regional Water - Quality Control Board must be empowered to determine the best and most cost effective treatment alternatives for meeting clean water standards, -•.17 OEM thereby protecting the surf zone from bacterja and viruses. The essence of the,Business Council's concerns over AB 1969 ie that the bill, as currently EURIRI�ffl;* written, unreasonably constrains them from doing so. By predetermining rYSIXFa91P their decision on treatment options, the, measure contributes to the - politicization of the matter and, more signifigantlyl diminishes the likelihood that decisions will be based upon sound science and economics. It is quite --.. M passible under this scenario that residents and business owners will be asked to bear costs and take actions that ldo not solve the problem. As 3 mmo.on such,AB 1969 jeopardizes the credibility of he regulatory process. - arU.rae D¢ The'Rusiness Council's specific concerns with AB 1969 are therefore two- �mrpms {pfd::.,,, .. .I 1.- AB 1969 interjects the legislature into El localtstate regulatory process -•that is well underway and working a intended to protect coastal resources; W..G" 'K 1 SMAIIYO^O{AYOi COYNTP'S.ECONOMIC FUTURE u 06/24/2002 10:03 19494760443 0CEC PAGE 03 The Honorable Ken Maddox - June 21, 2002 Page 2 of 2 i 2. AS 1969 has the potential to precit Je the selection of the best treatment alternative. We note that in some respects the con ms of the Business Council closely parallel those of the State Wateri Quality Control Board, which opposes AB 1969. Your consideration of t�ese concerns as you continue to move AB 1969 will be much appreciated.) We look forward to continuing our dialog ith you on this important issue and thank you for your anticipated conside lion of our comments. Start Oftelie Julie Puentes President& CEO Executive V.P. Public Affairs cc: "=Orange County legislative delegation- -State Water Resources Control Boa Regional Water Quality Control Boa Orange County Sanitation District California Chamber of Commerce •'-"ike Gotch, Secretary, Legislative At hirs—Office of the Governor l Soic`: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX July 19,2002 ITEM: SUBJECT: Amendment to Order No. 98-5, NPDES No. CA0110604, Waste Discharge Requirements, Orange County Water District, Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2,Orange County-Order No. R8-2002-0055 DISCUSSION: Summary On March 6, 1998, the Board adopted Order No. 98-5 and on May 6, 1998, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 signed the NPDES permit No. CA0110604, renewing the waste discharge requirements for Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) ocean outfall discharge. Receiving water monitoring data indicate that the discharge has consistently complied with the bacterial limitations contained in Order No. 98-5, which were established to protect both nearshore and offshore waters'. However, the data also indicate that the discharge plume has, on occasion, traveled closer to shore than predicted. Therefore, the discharge may pose a threat to water contact recreational uses. Regional Board staff recommends that Order No. 98-5 be amended to include disinfection requirements to address this threat. EPA agrees with this recommendation. The proposed amendment requires OCSD to implement disinfection facilities using sodium hypochlorite (chlorine bleach) and to dechlorinate using sodium bisulfite, since disinfection/dechlorination in this manner can be implemented most readily in the short-term. OCSD has not objected to the disinfection of the wastewater in this manner. OCSD is conducting an investigation of alternative long-term disinfection methods, which may lead to future modification of the disinfection requirements. In conjunction with incorporating chlorine disinfection requirements, it is necessary to amend the Order to specify limitations on chlorine residual. Further, since Order No. 98-5 was adopted, revisions to the acute toxicity limits and tests specified in the California Ocean Plan have occurred. The acute toxicity limits and test requirements specified in Order No. 98-5 implement the prior Ocean Plan and must be revised. If approved,this amendment to Order No. 98-5 would take effect on August 12,2002,consistent with the schedule for completion and operational start- up of the disinfection facilities. Nearshom waters are within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet form the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline. Offshore waters are between the nesrshore waters and the limit of ocean waters of the State (i.e., three miles from the shoreline.) d Sroff Report Page 2 of 5 ' Order No.R8-2002-0055,Amending Order No. 98-5 Ormrge Coant,Sanirarian Dltrrld Redomation Plam Na I and 7Yearmemftnr .2 Oisinfection/Chlorine Residual Order No. 98-5 contains receiving water limits designed to protect the health of people who come in contact with ocean waters that may be affected by the OCSD effluent discharge. These limits implement the bacterial water-contact objectives specified in the 1997 California Ocean Plan,which was in effect at the time Order No. 98-5 was adopted. Specifically, Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. requires that certain total and fecal coliform bacterial objectives shall be maintained within the nearshore zone and within the offshore zone to a depth of 10 feet to protect the water contact recreational use of those waters. The requirement to maintain the objectives to the 10-foot depth in offshore waters was based on the Regional Board's finding that it is the surface waters of the offshore zone to a depth of 10 feet that are used for water contact recreation'. Due to the location of the outfall (at 55 m depth and approximately 8.2 km (5.1 miles) offshore of the Huntington Beach area,just north of the Santa Ana River) and the ocean characteristics around the outfall, disinfection of the wastewater has not been necessary to maintain compliance with these objectives. In recent years, the waters off Huntington Beach have been plagued periodically with high concentrations of bacteria that have resulted in the posting and closure of the beaches to water- contact recreation. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the source(s) of the problem. To date, none of these studies has directly linked the problem to OCSD's wastewater discharge. However, recent monitoring work conducted by OCSD has detected low levels of total coliform bacteria, related to the discharge plume, at the surface at a sampling station about three miles from shore. The results also showed plume-related bacteria within one half mile of shore in the deep waters of a submarine canyon (Newport Canyon). Although neither the limitations in Order No. 98-5 nor the A.B. 411 bacterial standards for beach waters' were exceeded, Board staff believes that, based on these recent findings, it is prudent to require the disinfection of the wastewater, and to modify the bacterial limits contained in Order No. 98-5 to ensure that water-contact recreational activities in both offshore and nearshore ocean waters are not threatened by this discharge. This proposed amendment would require the implementation of disinfection facilities using sodium hypochlorite (chlorine bleach) and dechlorination facilities using sodium bisulfite, since disinfection/dechlorination in this manner can be most readily implemented in the short-term. Further,this proposed amendment would revise Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. to require that the bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column in the offshore zone,rather than in only the top ten feet. OCSD has not objected to the proposed disinfection requirements. Temporary chlorination/dechhorination facilities are expected to be operational by August 12, 2002. OCSD is conducting an evaluation of alternative, long-term disinfection strategies. The temporary chlorination/dechlorination facilities may eventually be supplanted by a more permanent solution,which may include use of an alternative disinfection agent. Revision of the disinfection requirements can be considered in the future, if warranted by the results of OCSD's investigations. ' The Ocean Plan stipulates that the bacterial objectives apply to the nearshore zone and to those areas outside that zone used for water contact sports,as determined by the Regional Board. ' These standards include total and fecal coliform, so well as emerococcus, another type of bacterial indicator. The Ocean Plan and AB 411 standards for total and fecal colifonn are very similar. 6 Staff Report Page 3 of _r- Order No. R8-2002-0055,Amending Order No. 98-5 t Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No.2 OCSD's stated operational goal with the disinfection process is to achieve both the Ocean Plan bacterial objectives (as reflected in Order No. 98-5) and the A.B. 411 bacterial standards at the boundary of the Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID) of the discharge. The ZID is approximately a 60- meter radius around the outfall. In light of this, while the proposed amendment would require that compliance with bacterial objectives be achieved throughout the nearshore and offshore zones, it may be appropriate in the future to consider extending the zone of compliance beyond the limit of offshore waters, perhaps to the ZID. To provide data needed to make this determination, this amendment would require the discharger to submit a proposal for an appropriate investigation. The discharger would be required to implement the investigation upon the Executive Officer's approval. It may be noted that this investigation would be expected to include analyses for enterococcus as well as total and fecal coliform so that conformance with A.B. 411 standards can also be evaluated'. These data will be considered in the upcoming renewal of Order No. 98-5, which is expected to be considered in 2003, and may result in a revision of the area in which compliance with bacterial objectives is to be achieved. Wastewater disinfection with chlorine usually produces a chlorine residual. Chlorine and its reaction products are toxic to aquatic life. Since disinfection with chlorine was not contemplated at the time Order No. 98-5 was issued, the permit does not contain any limits on the amoum of chlorine residual that may be in the effluent. In conjunction with the amendment of Order No. 98-5 to include requirements for disinfection using chlorine , Order No. 98-5 must be amended to add chlorine residual limits. The California Ocean Plan contains receiving water limits for chlorine residual for the protection of marine aquatic life. The proposed amendment would incorporate effluent limits into Order No. 98-5 that are based on these Ocean Plan water quality objectives. Acute Toxicity Order No. 98-5 contains effluent limits and testing requirements for acute toxicity that are based on the 1997 Ocean Plan, which was in effect at the time of permit adoption. The 1997 Ocean Plan specified the use of freshwater test organisms to determine compliance with acute toxicity limits. The proposed amendment does not require compliance with the A.B. 411 standards, but instead relies on the bacterial objectives in the Ocean Plan. The Ocean Plan may be revised in the future to include enterococcus objectives; in that case, further amendment of the Order would be necessary. There are also practical considerations that make it unreasonable to impose enterococcus limits at this time. Given holding time considerations,an alternative to the approved standard method would have to be utilized for the numerous samples collected offshore. The use of this alternative method is appropriate for research investigations but not for compliance purposes. Stof'Report Page 4 of Order No.R8-2002-0055,Amending Order No. 98-5 Orange County Summation District ,e Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No.2 The Ocean Plan has been revised since Order No. 98-5 was adopted. The current version of the Ocean Plan became effective on December 3, 2001 (2001 Ocean Plan). The new Ocean Plan revised the procedures to develop acute toxicity limits in permits and changed the testing protocols for determining compliance with those limits. Acute toxicity effluent limits are now to be based on the acute toxicity water quality objective that is specified in the Ocean Plan. In addition,the Ocean Plan now requires the use of marine test species instead of freshwater species when measuring compliance. The proposed amendment would revise the acute toxicity effluent limits and testing procedures in Order No.98-5 to conform to those specified in the 2001 Ocean Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Order No.R8-2002-0055,as presented. Comments were solicited from the following agencies: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,Permits Issuance Section(WTR-5)-Terry Oda U.S.Army District,Los Angeles,Corps of Engineers,Regulatory Branch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Carlsbad State Water Resources Control Board,Office of the Chief Counsel—Jorge Leon State Water Resources Control Board,Division of Water Quality-James Maughan _ State Department of Health Services,Carpenteria—John Curphey State Department of Health Services,Carpenteria-Jeff Stone State Department of Water Resources-Glendale State Department of Fish and Game-Long Beach Orange County Water District-Nira Yamachika Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority-Joseph Grindstaff Surfrider Foundation,Huntington/Long Beach Chapter Orange County Coastkeeper- Garry Brown Lawyers for Clean Water C/c San Francisco Baykeeper Dr.Jack Skinner - City of Anaheim City of Brea City of Buena Park Costa Mesa Sanitary District City of Cypress City of Fountain Valley City of Fullerton City of Garden Grove City of Huntington Beach Irvine Ranch Water District City of La Habra City of La Palm Slaf/Report Page 5 oj5 Order No.R8-1002-0055,Amending Order No. 98-5 Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Planl No. I and Treatment Plant No. 2 County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County City of Long Beach Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Area Sewer District Midway Cities Sanitation District City of Newport Beach City of Orange City of Placentia City of Santa Ana City of Seal Beach City of Stanton Sunset Beach Sanitary District City of Tustin City of Villa Park City of Weshninster Yorba Linda Water District Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Au Forces Reserve Center Los Alamitos California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region and U.S.Environmental Protection Agency Region Df Order No. R8-2002-M5 Amending Order No. 98-5,NPDES No.CA0110604 Waste Discharge Requirements And Authorization to Discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No.l and Treatment Plant No. 2 Orange County The California Regional Water Quality Control Boar ant a 'o (h ale} B ), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(here' ft ER d t: V 1. On March 6, 1998, the o d ado No. 5 4 nd on a 1 8 U.S. Environmental Protect n c , Region 'gn D .t o. 01 0604, renewing the waste di arge uir is fin th Col mt3 S tatio Di 'c Orange County (no o as nun ani tioi i E istri It ' after OCSD or discharg can all disc of c b' p 'nary and secondary treated ast at its am do P] t o. d T I aignt Plant No.2. 2 9 5 n g imits designed to protect the health of people ho in c to th ocean waters (both nearshore and offshore waters ) that ed by a SD effluent discharge. Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. bacterial objectives shall be maintained within the nearshore zone and thin the offshore zone to a depth of 10 feet to protect the water contact recreational of those waters. The requirement to maintain the objectives to the 10-foot depth in offshore waters was based on the Regional Board's finding that the waters in the top 10 feet of the offshore zone are used for water contact recreation. Due to the location of the outfall (at 55 in depth and approximately 8.2 km (5.1 miles) offshore of the Huntington Beach area,just north of the Santa Ana River) and the ocean characteristics around the outfall, disinfection of the wastewater has not been necessary to maintain compliance with these objectives. The discharge consistently meets these receiving water limits, as shown by receiving water monitoring data. Nearshore waters are within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet form the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline. Offshore wafers are between the nearshore waters and the limit of ocean waters of the State (t.e, three miles from the shoreline) Order No.R8-2001-0055,NPDES No.CA0110604 Page 2 of Orange Coaaty Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No.1 and Treatment Plant No.2 , 3. In recent years, the waters off Huntington Beach have been plagued periodically with high concentrations of bacteria that have resulted in the posting and closure of the beaches to water-contact recreation. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the source(s) of the problem. To date, none of these studies has directly linked the problem to OCSD's wastewater discharge. However, recent monitoring work conducted by OCSD has detected low levels of total coliform bacteria, related to the discharge plume, at the surface at a sampling station about three miles from shore. The results also showed plume-related bacteria within one half mile of shore in the deep waters of a submarine canyon (Newport Canyon). Although neither the limitations in Order No. 98- 5 nor the bacterial standards for beach waters established by the Department of Health Services (DHS) pursuant to Assembly Bill (A.B.) 411 were exceeded, it is prudent to require disinfection of the wastewater using sodium hypochlorite as the disinfection agent, and dechlorination of the wastewater using sodium bisulfite, since disinfmtion/dechlorination in this manner can be implemented most readily in the short- term. Further, it is prudent to modify the bacterial limits contained in Order No. 98-5 to ensure that water-contact recreational activities in both offshore and nearshore ocean waters are not threatened by this discharge. This proposed amendment requires the implementation of chlorination (using sodium hypochloriteydechlorination (using sodium bisulfite) facilities, and revises Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. to require that the bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column in the offshore zone,rather than in only the top ten feet.. 4. OCSD has not objected to disinfection/dechlorination of the wastewater and, at least initially, will use, sodium hypochlorite (bleach) as the disinfection agent. Sodium bisulfite will be used to dechlorinate the wastewater. These interim facilities are expected to commence operations by August 12,2002. OCSD is conducting an evaluation of long- term disinfection alternatives, which may result in recommendations for future revision of the cblorination/dechlorination requirements to implement an alternative disinfection strategy. 5. Wastewater disinfection with chlorine usually produces a chlorine residual. Chlorine and its reaction products are toxic to aquatic life. Since disinfection with chlorine was not contemplated at the time Order No. 98-5 was issued, the permit does not contain any limits on the amount of chlorine residual that may be in the effluent. In conjunction with- the amendment of Order No. 98-5 to include requirements for disinfection using chlorine, Order No. 98-5 must be amended to add chlorine residual limits. ' These standards include total and fecal coliform, as well as enterococcus, another type of bacterial indicator. The Ocean Plan and A.B. 411 standards for total and fecal coliform are very similar. Order No.R8-2002-0055,NPDES No. CA0110604 - Page 3 of 9 _ Orange County Sanitation Districts ' Reclamation Plant No. l and Treatment Plant No.2 6. OCSD's stated operational goal with the disinfection process is to achieve both the Ocean Plan bacterial objectives (as reflected in Order No. 98-5) and the A.B. 411 bacterial - standards at the boundary of the Zone of Initial Dilution(ZID)of the discharge. The ZID is approximately a 60-meter radius around the outfidl. In light of this,while the proposed amendment would require that compliance with bacterial objectives be achieved throughout the nearshore and offshore zones, it may be appropriate in the future to consider extending the zone of compliance beyond the limit of offshore waters, perhaps to the ZID. To provide data needed to make this determination, this amendment would require the discharger to submit a proposal for an appropriate investigation. The discharger would be required to implement the investigation upon the Executive Officer's approval. It may be noted that this investigation would be expected to include analyses for enterococcus as well as total and fecal coliform so that conformance with A.B. 411 standards can also be evaluated'. These data will be considered in the upcoming renewal of Order No. 98-5, which is expected to be considered in 2003, and may result in a revision of the area in which compliance with bacterial objectives is to be achieved. 7. Order No. 98-5 also specified acute toxicity limits and test requirements based on the 1997 Ocean Plan. The acute toxicity requirements in the 1997 Ocean Plan were based on best available technology. Since the adoption of Order No. 98-5, the 1997 Ocean Plan has been revised. A new Ocean Plan became effective on December 3, 2001 (2001 Ocean Plan). The new Ocean Plan revised the procedures to develop acute toxicity limits in permits and changed the testing protocols for determining compliance with those limits. Acute toxicity effluent limits are now to be based on the acute toxicity water quality objective that is specified in the Ocean Plan. In addition, the Ocean Plan now requires the use of marine test species instead of freshwater species when measuring compliance. It is appropriate to revise the acute toxicity limits and testing protocols specified in Order No. 98-5 to be consistent with the 2001 Ocean Plan. 8. In accordance with Water Code Section 13389 of the California Water Code, the amendment of Order No. 98-5,NPDES No.CA0110604,is exempt from those provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act contained in Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 21100),Division 13 of the Public Resources Code. 9. On June 19, 2002, the Regional Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency notified the discharger and other interested agencies and persons of their intent to amendhnodify the waste discharge requirements and authorization to discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for the discharge and provided them with an opportunity to submit their written views and recommendations. 3 The proposed amendment does not require compliance with the A.B. 411 standards, but instead relies on the bacterial objectives in the Ocean Plan. The Ocean Plan may be revised in the future to include enterococcus objectives: in that case,further amendment of the Order would be necessary. There are also Practical considerations that make it unreasonable to impose enierococcus limits at this time. Given holding time considerations, an alternative to the approved standard method would have to be utilized for the numerous samples collected offshore. The use of this alternative method is appropriate for research investigations but not for compliance purposes. Order No.R8-1002-0055,NPDES No. CA0110604 Page 4 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No.I and Treatment Plant No.2 10. The Regional Board and the EPA, in a public hearing on July 19, 2002 will hear and consider all comments pertaining to the discharge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Order No. 98-5 shall be amended as follows: 1. Discharge Specification A.l.b. - Delete limitations for acute toxicity as follows (Language deleted is shown in double strike out type): b. Major Wastewater Constituents and Properties Limitations Constituent Units 30-day Average 7-day Average Maximum at anytime Grease and oil mg/1 25 40 75 Ibs/day3 61,500 98,400 184,000 Suspended Solids n/a As 30-day average,75%removal from influent stream or 60 mg/l,whichever rate is higher Settleable Solids mm 1.0 1.5 3.0 Turbidity NTU 75 100 225 PH units Within 6.0 to 9.0 at all times 2. Discharge Specification A.l.d. -Add limitations for total residual chlorine and acute toxicity as follows(Language added is in bold type and highlighted): d, Toxic Materials Limitations for the Protection of Marine Aquatic Life Constituent Units 6-month Median Daily Maximum instantaneous Maximum Tgtst gsidli¢t'Ch1'o 5po MO Q 3¢ 145 Chronic Toxicity TUc n/a 181 n/a Radioactivity Not to exceed limitations specified in Title 17,Division 1,Chapter 5, Subchapter 4,Group 3,Article 3,Section 32®49 30433 of the CCR 5 Mass emission rates bated on a ro'ected end-of-permit annual ave p � rage igJluentflow of295 MGD. OrderNa RS-1002-0055,NPDES No. Gr011060I Page 5 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant Na 1 3. Acute and Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Requirements B.l.a. - Revise as follows (language added is in bold type and highlighted, language deleted is shown in double strike out type): a. Test Species and Methods The discharger shall conduct monthly tests with the following vertebrate and invertebrate species for the first three tests. Auer this screening period, quarterly tests shall be conducted with the most sensitive species. 1) Vertebrate: Fathoad 6 'r'§q - -f iia�'iq 84 . 2 Invertebrate: i Every year, the discharger shall re-screen during one quarterly test, at different times than the prior year(s) and continue to monitor with the most sensitive species. For 4 ."4 . %& Q& n , the presence of acute toxicity shall be estimated usin a 96-hour static test, as secnfied m ri ,far to 19 . 22Le fS b0_'O7!{9Asf _ Aber For@" 4 44nephalss pren oku, the presence of acute toxicity shall be estimated using a 96-hour static test, as specified in Methods or Measu�'rpi�n$ the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Aquatic Organisms .._ .A 4. Acute and Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Requirements B.l.b. - Revise as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted, language deleted is in double strike out type): b. Definition of Acute Toxicity Acute toxicity in effluents shall be measured using a multi-concentration test, consisting of a control and a minimum of five effluent concentrations. The tests are designed to provide dose-response information, expressed as the percent effluent concentration that is lethal to 50 percent of the test organisms (LC50) within the prescribed period of time(24-96 hours). Test results shall be reported in TUa, where TUa= 100/LC50. For this discharge, acute toxicity is defined by an exceedance of an acute toxicity effluent limitation specified in Discharge Specification A.1.6 b. Order No.R8-2001-0055,NPDES No. CA0110604 Page 6 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's e Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No.2 5. Receiving Water Limitations D.l.a.l) - Revise as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted,language deleted is in double strike out type): 1) Water-Contact Standards Within the Nearshore_:and. ffshore Zon the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: 6. Required Notices and Reports-Add new paragraph number 10. as follows: 10. Within 30-days of the effective date of this Order, the discharger shall file with the Regional Board a written proposal to conduct an investigation of the effects of the discharge on the bacterial quality of the ocean waters between the zone of initial dilution (ZID) boundary and offshore waters. This investigation shall be designed to collect data needed to evaluate whether and where compliance with the bacterial limitations in this Order and the bacterial standards established by the DHS pursuant to A.B. 411 can be consistently achieved. The proposal shall include time schedules for conducting the investigations. 7. Provisions - Revise paragraph H.5 as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted): 5. The discharger shall comply with M&RP No 98 5 M -� #he'Srecutive orme mWt orttrig m c3ie dF ra o?(PP e7£figtnremepts ,: n"-ate. )�rreeu�ve b �cxy� a x aarJ ea.� u 4117 •� at4 .. �onROr�gyca�i,_� C�, a ^L..G..� fir. ?i a d k � t _ A ,iontLaglrot ' `eH1u4t4 �4 tl�_:.�PJ-�T � {il'• r� l��llrrft-6i .jVd" �CTJ, pail Q x t�r�` qu�tsidet °r� frol6x the EiFeEv�e �epn e3ycpt mmu np °aa a fqr the.'lashb months allow $nce wiitt efLlueat limtatians. Order Ne.R8-2002-0055,NPOES No. CIOII0604 Page 7of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's ° Reclamation Plant No.I and Treatment Plant No.1 d S)iould any of the dati�r weekly, mo&tbly, or quarterly moil toring sTiow etuenteUvicequaponsY�lwpeDatl elfluant .lig�tt the afiequeucy of monttorulgfttr Y4ral cisrlgpne residual shaft be inpreased to tla11y orweekly as,d?FBotl;d'.�]. 11e Eriecp�ve'Of�cg�; 8. Provision-Add new paragraph number 22.as follows: 22. The discharger shall install and implement chlorination (using sodium hypochlorite) and dechlorination (using sodium bisulfite) facilities for the disinfection of the wastewater. By March 1, 2003, the discharger shall submit a report that describes the results of the discharger's investigation of alternative disinfection methods and the plan and schedule for pilot testing of selected alternatives. The discharger shall implement this plan upon approval by the Regional Board's Executive Officer. This Order may be reopened to revise the disinfection requirements if warranted by the results of these investigations. 9. Provision-Add new paragraph number 23. as follows: 23. Upon approval of the investigation program required in Required Notices and Reports G.10. above, the discharger shall implement the program. 10. Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 98-5, Influent and Effluent Monitoring - Revise paragraph B.2. and Table (table partially shown with the new changes) as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted): 2. The following constituents shall be monitored in the influent and effluent, except for settleable solids, turbidity,pH, (ft! a1 C`h'fo_ljq;e, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, radioactivity, and TCDD equivalents which shall be monitored only in the effluent. settleable solids myl grab daily monthly ,Toto x'r�'rm!' 4r a �ikni a6 .4 z ,a utoift turbidity MU 24 hr. composite monthly monthly Order No.R8-1001-0055,NPDES No. CA0110604 Page 8 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's , Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No.2 11. Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 98-5, Receiving Water Monitoring requirement D.l.b. - Revise the paragraph immediately following the subject title "Offshore Water Quality Monitoring"and add new paragraph as follows(Language added is in bold type and highlighted,language deleted is in double strike out type): Offshore water quality monitoring data are used to determine compliance with receiving water limitations, State water quality standards, and to assist in the interpretation of biological data. The Ocean Plan establishes quantitative water quality objectives for dissolved oxygen, light transmittance, and pH, as well as qualitative objectives for floating particulates, grease and oil,and discoloration of the ocean surface. The Regional Board has determined that the surface waters of the Offshore Zone, to a depth of 10 fill, are used for water contact recreation.twA6" The @sean Pi �i e� y to�Fsgion 113oard auB EP p `ve eteWbed s} Atit _. is app" o> XrLte,�b; apply 66cferlh7 $laridards 6roughoSt) he�water column fo ttie offshore zone to assur'R�thaY the-disowge dyes :not pope a OreaY to water contact recreational 0.4". 12. Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 98-5, Receiving Water Monitoring requirement D.l.b. - Revise the paragraph between Table RWM-1- and Table RWM-2 as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted, language deleted is in double strike out type): Al each station, a secchi disk shall be used to assess transparency, and visual observations of surface waters shall be noted. Temperature, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), light transmittance, photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), and chlorophyll-a shall be measured at 1 m intervals throughout the entire water column to 2 m above the bottom at each station using a CTD with attached meters (for pH, DO, light transmittance, PAR, chlorophyll-a). All station depths shall be surveyed for actual bottom depth. At stations greater than 75 m, profiles shall be sampled to a maximum depth of 75 m. Grab samples for ammonia-nitrogen, total coliform organisms, and Escherichia coli shall be collected at discrete depths from 1 m below surface, 5 m, 10 m, 15 m, etc.,to 2 m above the bottom or to a maximum depth of 60 m. For the purposes of determining compliance with Receiving Water Limitation D.l.al.b, five samples for total coliform organisms and Escherlchia coli shall be collected at six stations ES, 4;-4; 4; 0, 4;�(24Q'�.,x` 4 209, ib�, 04ana C )at discrete'depths in Table IF N M-1 to a m#O pum deptti of 60 m. 13. All other conditions and requirements of Order No. 98-5 shall remain unchanged. 14. This Order shall take effect on August 12,2002. Order No.R8-2002-0055,NPDES No. C40110604 Page 9 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treannent Plant No. 2 I, Gerard J. Thibeault, Executive Officer, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of Order No. R8-2002-0055 adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, on July 19, 2002. Gerard J. Thibeault Executive Officer California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region 1, Alexis Strauss, Director, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of modifications to NPDES Permit No. CA0110604 adopted by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, on July 19, 2002. Alexis Strauss,Director Water Division U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX May 28,2002 PAC2 Workshop#5 Alternative Evaluation Table Comments and Questions. 1. Alternative treatment D,employing microfiltmtion technology following advanced secondary treatment was not an option that was ever under consideration during the 1999 strategic plan,or the GRS project technical planning phase.Why is the OCSD staff choosing to place this alternative on the table now? 2. How many other POTW's are using this technology?How many in Southern California are using this technology or considering using it?Why don't we have other partners to help us finance the development of this R&D project(San Diego,Golita)? 3. Total Coliform Levels<I,000(Public Health column)assumes that the chemical disinfection(chlorine) bench scale testing that OCSD is currently conducting is successful in demonstrating both to the County Health Care Agency,and the Regional Water Quality Control Board that such a procedure is protective of both marine life and public health. Additionally,an EIR/EIS should be generated,and public comment solicited before any commitment to this alternative is made.Contrary to what the public has been led to believe by premature and inaccurate press releases,OCSD does NOT have the unilateral authority to use this technology. 4. If the retention time in the OCSD treatment system is insufficient for chemical(chlorine) disinfection,and de-chlorination,then additional structures must be constructed in order to use this technology.The cost impact,particularly for alternatives A&B, is not insignificant,and is not reflected in the"cost effectiveness"tables? 5. The projected TSS(Water Quality)for alternative B(50/50 blend)is 39mg/L?presently it is about 51 mg(L.at a 50/50 blend.How is OCSD planning to achieve a 20°/a improvement in advanced primary suspended solids removal efficiency?How long will it take to achieve this goal?How much will it cost? 6. Virus levels(public health)are estimated from the 1999 strategic plan.Can't we get more recent supporting data for these values from the bench scale tests? 7. Energy costs at OCSD are currently$0.037 per KWHr.The average home owner pays about$0.08 per KWHr.The energy use cost in terms of equivalent homes is therefore less than one-half of that indicated in the Environmental Impacts table("Equivalent Homes"). There are approx. 1,000,000 equivalent units(homes)in the district.Thus,the energy usage cost impact to the ratepayer for any of the alternatives is about one percent. 8. The current OCSD NPDES permit with the 301(h)waiver allows a suspended solids mass emission tale of 20,000 metric tons per year with a re-opener provision to allow them to go to 30,000 metric tons per year.The present suspended solids emission rate at OCSD is about 17,000 metric tons per year,and has been relatively stable at this value for the past several years.This permit limit represents an increase of 18%and 75% respectively.Conversly,the relative impact on county landfill capacity and basin air quality(VOC emissions)with respect to the assimilative capacity of land and air resources for any of the other alternatives is less than 1%.The tables included in the summary statement comparing the alternatives as"lower or higher"or"more or less"are not quantified.Ahy decision based on this table alone would be a gross error of judgment. 9. There is a real problem in understanding how the"fair rate policies"recommended by the rate advisory committee is being implemented at the District.For example,why is the GWRS considered a"water supply for existing users"when,in fact it is required because of the rapid growth of population of"new users"in North Orange County?Why are large developers allowed to buy in to our"Publicly Owned Treatment Works"at substantially less than the fair market value,or replacement cost of the Districts facilities? Why are large entertainment users given a discount from a policy that is supposed to charge according to"Flow and strength"?Out of what budget does the expense for a political lobbyist for OCSD staff come from?(ratepayers or connection fees?). 10. As one of the Board members has recently stated,"the Sanitation District issues are much to complicated for the average citizen to understand."It is also far too complex and important of an issue to leave to a Board of Directors who do not have the technical,legal or financial backround to make an informed decision on these issues. 11. The CDM staff,and OCSD representatives at these workshops should be commended for attempting to reduce these issues in a few pages of text in a language that our Board of Directors can understand. Doz Member OCSD PAC2 CC:Norm Eckenrode Jun-26-02 03:17aa Fros-City of AnahaimMity Wr 714 765 51 7-857 alnnl/nm F-510 FMNKFPi TU5,=,Pm Tm c TOMTAn.CYYndI MUMtt V/ I SNIR N,Co q Ma , CITY OF�17`rl�ll'iu.+,(`i[tl<Il�]ZIl1AL LngLLEKRING MUn Ma r omm or the Mayor end city council oNoeo June 26,2002 Members of the Board Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SUBJECT: CHAIRMAN SELECTION Dear Honwable Board Members: I am seeking your support for election as the Chairman of the 011ange County Sanitation District (OCSD). Currently I serve as the Vice Chairman and attend and participte in all committee meetings. Tins arffords me the opportunity to have an overall understanding of the numerous issues the OCSD fades. I served on the Finance,Administration and Humor Resources Committee PANR tier three years and was chairman during the past year. My OCSD experience,coupled with my other leadership responsibilities, which include serving as Char of the League of California Cities Housing, Communit}/and Economic Development Policy Committee,board member of the Orange County Transportation Authority,and three years as Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of Anaheim,has well prepared me to serve as the Chairman of the Orange County Sanitation District. Orange County and the Orange County Sanitation District facemtany challenges in the coming year. Issues ranging from the recently released State Budget May revise,the CrroundWater Replenishment System, urban runoff, degree of treatment of effluent,and balancing fiscal constrarms are just a few to be addressed. I'm offering my leadership skills to assist OCSD in addressing these challenges in 2002-03. Should you wish to discuss my candidacy further,please feel-free to call me at C714)765-5247. I hope I can count on your vote for the Chairman of the Orange County Sanitation District. Sincerely, Shirley McCracken Council Member 200 South Anaheim BoAvard,Anahotm,CaMomia 92805 (714)765-5247 • FAX(714)765 5164 • Lvrsanaheim not 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Patna: June 26, 2002 (714)982.2411 feu (714)SM2 58 vasseoosd'eOT The Honorable Senator Dade Alpert malll„p address, Chair, Appropriations Committee ac Box 8127 State Senate raunteln Valley,CA 92728-8127 State Capitol, Room 2082 steat.am.es: Sacramento, CA 95814 108"all:Asa"aa "stein valley.CA Re: Oppose Assembly Bill 1969 Maddox s2 Valley 1 PP Y (Maddox) fiamhe, Dear Senator Alpert: pavntive On behalf of the Orange County Sanitation District(Sanitation District), I urge you, as Cities Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, to cast a disapproving NO vote on the measure proposed by Assemblyman Ken Maddox that would prevent the Anaheim Sanitation District from seeking a modified permit under Section 301(h) of the Buena Park Federal Clean Water Act. cypress �`°p„gerrao; The legislature's intervention in this matter Is an unnecessary and counterproductive Gardan crass distraction that steps in the way of well-managed national and state water quality Huntington Basch each protection programs that have collectively existed for over 30 years. It is poorly La Hears conceived and should be disapproved. It is bad law. Le Pa/me Ln Beach ive The bill is bad law because it incorrectly applies a$271 million non-remedy to a$10 crane• million problem. What I mean is this. The bill insists on full secondary treatment as Irleearkla Santa A. a solution to the bacterial contamination problems along Huntington Beach or see/Beach Newport Beach. Full secondary treatment will cost an estimated$271 million to stamen Nedn construct, take ten years to implement, and will NOT eliminate bacteria from our Me Perk treated ocean discharge plume. On the other hand, bleach-based disinfection will Verbs Linde cost less than$10 million to build, will take two months to implement and will D,anta of manes eliminate any possibility of bacteria from our treated ocean discharge plume of causing problems in Huntington Beach or Newport Beach. I would add that the Banks" Districts operating cost for disinfection is a fraction of the cost of full secondary treatment. Cause csa The bill is bad law because If the Sanitation District decides to achieve full seconds hmdway cityrY treatment standards, it must use a particular treatment technology because of this Wets, Diserlees bill. This will prevent the Sanitation District from using the most appropriate, Mums Bench innovative and cost-effective treatment technologies available now and in the future. This will mean that other environmental resources (air, land, and energy) will be burdened with unnecessary impacts and that rate-payers will be burdened with unnecessary user fees. To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. ,a The Honorable Senator Dede Alpert June 26,2002 Page 2 The bill is bad law because it implies that the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the U.S. EPA, in their oversight and review responsibilities, cannot be trusted to make a competent, informed decision about the level of treatment. The Legislature, over 30 years ago, created the Regional Water Quality Control Board system for the express purpose of regulating discharges and protecting the State waters. The bill is bad law because it prejudicially singles out Orange County and ignores San Diego, Goleta, and Morro Bay, local jurisdictions that also possess Clean Water Act Section 301(h) modified ocean discharge permits. One can speculate that if this bill is successful, then the other three agencies will be picked off one at a time. That is not a practice that this state legislature should promote or condone. More to the point, If the legislature, in its wisdom,finds that a modified permit is inappropriate for Orange County, what is the basis for finding otherwise for the cases of San Diego, Goleta and Morro Bay? The fact is there has been no deliberate process whatsoever regarding the question of the other three. Therefore, on its face, ABt 969 is prejudicial and therefore unlawful. The bill is bad law because it implies that the 25 members of our board of directors, representing each of the cities, special districts, and unincorporated areas of our service area, are incapable of making an appropriate and informed decision about how to protect public health and the environment on behalf of the citizens of Orange County. The Sanitation District was created by the state legislature for the express purpose of managing wastewater and protecting the environment. The Board of Directors has been effectively doing so for nearly 50 years. The United States EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board have found this to be true as expressed in many ways including awards and continued findings of compliance. It is not necessary to create a bill that overrides the record of the Sanitation District's Board of Directors to consistently achieve the expectations of EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board The bill is bad law because it contradicts the facts and the science of the ocean conditions off Orange County. There is not a single scientific observation that connects the treated discharge plume of the Sanitation District with elevated beach bacterial counts. Science cannot eliminate the possibility of it happening (it's impossible to prove a negative), but the fact is there isn't even one observed event of it happening. The bill is bad law because it is unnecessary. The Sanitation District has already announced that it will begin disinfecting its effluent this summer. Disinfection will once and for all eliminate any possibility of the Sanitation District's discharge plume causing bacterial contamination problems in Orange County. That fact, in and of itself, is all that the legislature and this committee needs to consider. The problem will be solved by disinfection in months. Full secondary treatment, which will take at least ten years to implement, will do nothing to address the bacterial contamination issue. The solution is timely and effective disinfection. The Honorable Senator Dede Alpert June 26, 2002 Page 3 The bill is bad law because the Orange County Sanitation District has consistently met the standards of EPA and the federal Clean Water Act. In 17 years of operating under the permit, Orange County Sanitation District has never been in violation of federal clean water standards, the California Ocean Plan or its permit. The Sanitation District operates an extensive ocean monitoring program, investing more than $2 million a year to make sure the ocean remains safe and healthy for the marine environment and for the public to use for recreation. The monitoring program is part of the ocean wastewater discharge permit issued jointly by the U.S. EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board. According to the EPA, the Orange County monitoring program is a model is an excellent model and it is considering incorporating it into the programs for the other coastal communities, irregardless of whether they hold modified permits or not. The bill is bad law because the Clean Water Act was adopted by Congress after years of scientific research and study. It is uniformly applied across the country, including Orange County and the other California coastal communities. The Clean Water Act specifically provides site-specific standards for a very few uniquely qualifying coastal dischargers as a long-term alternative for water resource protection. Four coastal communities in California have received this unique privilege: Orange County, San Diego, Goleta, and Morro Bay. The bill is bad law because the Sanitation District Board of Directors will make a deliberate determination about this important public policy decision concerning the level of treatment in July. The Board will consider the scientific, technical, financial, regulatory and public opinion issues implied by this multi-faceted environmental issue so important to Orange County. All of the efforts of staff, board, consultants, and the public will be nullified and made moot by this intervention by the state legislature Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of Orange County Sanitation District's major concerns. Very trul yours BLAKE P. ANDERSON General Manager BPA:jt c,.v.euvom,nw�mnm daka�ca,amazsozmrosa,e.e.u�m,aoc cc: Senator Jim Battin, Vice Chair, Senate Appropriations Committee Members of the Senate Appropriations Committee Mr. Norm Eckenrode, Chair, OCSD Board of Directors Members of the OCSD Board of Directors � I RE: Agenda Item No. 17(c) UV Disinfection Equipment Selection Process Summary July 30, 2001 —JCC directed staff on pre-selection of UV equipment based on a performance specification. October 8, 17, and 24—Approvals by JCC, OCWD and OCSD Boards were made to issue RFP for UV equipment pre-selection. March 11, 2002—JCC approved and recommended to the Boards of OCWD and OCSD that Trojan be selected to provide UV disinfection equipment based on lowest life cycle cost analysis. Both Boards deferred the item back to staff. OCSD Board requested staff to address a letter issued by Calgon dated March 1, 2002. A response letter dated April 9 was issued by OCWD to address Calgon's concerns. The letter addressed consistency with current equipment installed at OCWD, technical and economic factors regarding the fife cycle cost analysis, and financial stability of both Trojan and Calgon. April 22, 2002—Staff presented an update on the UV equipment to the JCC with no actions being taken. The update presented the response letter dated April 9 to Calgon. Staff also distributed a letter received that day from Loretta Sanchez regarding the "Buy American" issue. OCWD Board approved the equipment award to Trojan on May 15, 2002. May 22, 2002, the OCSD Steering Committee recommended that the award of a contract to Trojan Technologies be referred back to the JCC. This item is before the Board this month with the attached additional information which includes a summary of issues of concern, a financial statement for Trojan Technologies for the period ending May 31, 2002, and a letter from Trojan addressing their American presence and use of American made products. Summary of Pertinent Issues on Preselection of Trojan Technologies "Buy American" Issues 1 • The "Buy American"provision in the Federal regulations(40 CFR, 35-936-13.d) indicates that domestic equipment may be used in preference to non-domestic equipment if the cost difference is no more than 6%. and a greater differential is deemed unreasonable; Calgon's equipment cost is 24% greater than Trojan's costs. • Over 70% of Trojan's projects are located in the United States and Trojan has offices in Atlanta, Tucson, and California. (Trojan pays state taxes in these three states.) • Over 50%of all equipment to be supplied by Trojan for the GWR System is of American origin. Engineering,final testing, and system fabrication are the major items performed in Canada. • The UV portion of the GWR System equipment is only 13% of the total as compared to MF (33%) and RO (54%). All RO manufacturers qualified to supply equipment to the GWR System are based in the United States. Financial Viability • Trojan's second quarter revenue was$22.7 million (net income of$1.1 million)and third quarter revenue was $25.2 million (net income of$1.2 million). • Trojan has a backlog of$40 million not including the GWR System project. • Trojan has retired all short-tens indebtedness and has a positive cash flow. • Trojan has successfully met all bonding requirements delineated in the contract documents. • Trojan has recently been selected by the City of Seattle for a 180 mgd drinking water UV disinfection system (the largest in the world). • The Water Replenishment District has recently selected Trojan for the Alamitos Barrier Project (3 mgd), which involves the use of MF and RO on tertiary effluent as pretreatment to UV for NDMA destruction. Contractual Issues • The Trojan proposal was deemed to be responsible and responsive by staff and met all criteria required in the specifications. • Staff recommendation is to award to the lowest, responsible proposer Trojan Technologies. • The pre-selection and design of the GWR System UV process is on the critical path in order to finish final design and meet OCSD wet weather flow requirements. • Staff expert opinion prefers the Trojan system to the Calgon system. • Trojan is only due $250,000 ($125,000 OCSD share)for design and due no other money until construction. ($250,000 design cost is 1/120 of total project design cost of$30 million) • The Trojan UV system requires 983,000 Kw-hr per year less power to operate than the Calgon system. • OCWD board of directors approved the selection of Trojan at their May 15, 2002 meeting. JUN-U-02 10:54 From:TROJAN TECHNOLOGIES 5194573030 T-333 P.01 Job-ZIZ • � rwumr TrsjenTechnelsgies Inc. Word L.de in uv ouinlcu.sy.,.n,. June 24, 2002 FAX— 714.378.3373 Mr. William R. Everest, P.E. Associate General Manager Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Everest: Thank you for our meeting of June 19, 2002. which afforded the opportunity to discuss Trojan's involvement in the Orange County Groundwater Replenlshment System Project. As indicated during the meeting, Trojan considers this to be an extremely Important project, and looks forward to working with Orange County Water District over the coming months. As discussed during our meeting, I am forwarding herewith copies of Trojan's financial results for the period ending May 31, 2002. These results show strong growth in Trojan's UV business, overall continued profitable performance and a very strong Balance Sheet. I believe these results strongly confirm Trojan's financial ability to successfully execute on the Orange County GWRS Project. As also discussed. Trojan has had nearly 25 years of successful municipal project activity cross America. Over 70% of Trojan's projects are installed In the United states. To support our activities in America, Trojan has offices in Atlanta and Tucson, and has Engineering staff located in California. Trojan pays state taxes in these regions We will soon be locating a Trojan Service Technician in Southern California in order to be able to provide 2417 service to our growing installed customer base. Finally, as mentioned during our meeting. Trojan expects that the total U.S, content on the Orange County GWRS project will be a minimum of 50%. Many of our critical components are manufactured and sourced in the USA. Trojan has also extensively used the expertise and experience of our American experts to design, test and validate the equipment proposed for the Orange County GWRS project. It is Trojan's intent to maximize the US content an this project. I trust this information Is satisfactory, and if you need to call please do so. Yours truly, TROJAN TECHNOLOGI S INC. Allan Bulckaert, President& CEO AB:jw .Attachments, ------ j 3020 bore Road.London.Omarb.Canada NSV 477 •Tolouhone:(519)457.3400 • Fax:15191 157-3030 • www.orolanuv.com 'h 06/24/2002 10:03 19494750443 OCBC PAGE 02 .. ` . ORANSECOUNTY 2 P+rk RUA.adln 100. """ I,.,....,,yq,,,. ...,,.. .. ...,a,,...,,..,�-,..c.-......:.w—•,�. rMne,fallrar°in92614-5909 $UISINI $COUNCIL ph°nc 949.476.220•by 949.476.9240.wirmmu.ocbcmg — cop,I , a a I l2£Cr cgs e¢arme m.+wry June 21, 2002 _ ��y Ta SC(5rr''Xil- < V I& FAx Oc satr� The Honorable Ken Maddox 4w State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: AB 1969 (Maddox) Dear Assemblyman Maddox: The Orange County Business Council Business CounciUOCBC), a �Caw countywide organization of business lead rs and companies throughout = Orange County, is dedicated to Orange ounty's economic vitality and sw",�.a quality of life. We share your concern pve the beach closures and beach BtiS'lPir.P irc i _ postings that have occurred along the.Or4nge County coastline. These ® �•'� closures and postings adversely affect Orange County's quality of life as well as its economic prosperity. At the same time, the Business Council is rll�avaw.rw—u concerned over your AB 1969 as currently written because we believe it could undermine efforts to adopt the best solutions possible. rrn The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)!, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board must be empowered to de;ermine the best and most cost effective treatment alternatives for nleetina clean water standards, »._� ¢a thereby protecting the surf zone from bacte and viruses. The essence of , _„ theBusiness Council's concerns over AB 1;969 ip that the bill, as currently .gCijII0 written, unreasonably constrains them from dolgg so. By predetermining Pill il their decision on treatment options, the, measure contributes to the pollticization of the matter and, more signifiganByF diminishes the likelihood that decisions will be based upon sound science and economics. It is quite �.....>� possible. under this scenario that residents and! business owners will be asked to bear costs and take actions that ldo not solve the problem. As ) cw - such,AB 1969 jeopardizes the credibility of he regulatory process. - J \YyP Thw Business council's specific concerns Y' h AB 1969 are therefore two- fold::' 1.-AB-1969 interjects the legislature into a IomVstate regulatory process that is well underway and working a intended to protect coastal - •'�* resources; rc.4' uw. . M n— E NAPINp.•pRPNOE COYNTT'S.ECONOMIC FYYU nF F. � ll 96/24/2002 10:03 19494760443 0C3C PAGE 03 The Honorable Ken Maddox _ June 21, 2002 Page 2 of 2 2. AB 1969 has the potential to preclude the selection of the best treatment alternative. We note that in some respects the concerns of the Business Council closely parallel those of the State Water l Quality Control Board, which opposes AB 1969. Your consideration of these concerns as you continue to move AB 1969 will be much appreciated.I We look forward to continuing our dialog viith you on this important issue and thank you for your anticipated conslde 7 lion of our comments. ^I -Sincerely, U', - Stan Oftelie Julie Puentes President &CEO Fir cutive V.P. Public Affairs cc,. i%Orange County legislative delegation- - �'e-State Water Resources Control Boa Regional Water Quality Control Boar -0range County Sanitation Distrid I �. California Chamber of Commerce - Mike Gotch, Secretary, Legislative A irs— Office of the Governor I I q.i l I JLEGIyAT9:L-]6J136Ru]1{W.GpC .1r }r� +� California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX July 19, 2002 ITEM: SUBJECT: Amendment to Order No. 98-5, NPDES No. CA0110604, Waste Discharge Requirements, Orange County Water District, Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2,Orange County-Order No. R8-2002-0055 DISCUSSION: Summary On March 6, 1998, the Board adopted Order No. 98-5 and on May 6, 1998, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 signed the NPDES permit No. CA0110604, renewing the waste discharge requirements for Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) ocean outfall discharge. Receiving water monitoring data indicate that the discharge has consistently complied with the bacterial limitations contained in Order No. 98-5, which were established to protect both nearshore and offshore waters'. However, the data also indicate that the discharge plume has, on occasion, traveled closer to shore than predicted. Therefore, the discharge may pose a threat to water contact recreational uses. Regional Board staff recommends that Order No. 98-5 be amended to include disinfection requirements to address this threat. EPA agrees with this recommendation. The proposed amendment requires OCSD to implement disinfection facilities using sodium hypochlorite (chlorine bleach) and to dechlorinate using sodium bisulfite, since disinfection/dechlorination in this manner can be implemented most readily in the short-term. OCSD has not objected to the disinfection of the wastewater in this manner. OCSD is conducting an investigation of alternative long-term disinfection methods, which may lead to future modification of the disinfection requirements. In conjunction with incorporating chlorine disinfection requirements, it is necessary to amend the Order to specify limitations on chlorine residual. Further, since Order No. 98-5 was adopted, revisions to the acute toxicity limits and tests specified in the California Ocean Plan have occurred. The acute toxicity limits and test requirements specified in Order No. 98-5 implement the prior Ocean Plan and must be revised. If approved,this amendment to Order No. 98-5 would take effect on August 12,2002, consistent with the schedule for completion and operational start- up of the disinfection facilities. Nearshore waters are within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet form the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline. Offshore waters are between the nearshore waters and the limit of ocean waters of the State (i.e., three miles from the shoreline.) SlafjRepon Pagel of5 Order No.R8-2002-0055,Amending Order No.98-5 V. . Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No.2 Disinfection/Chlorine Residual Order No. 98-5 contains receiving water limits designed to protect the health of people who come in contact with ocean waters that may be affected by the OCSD effluent discharge. These limits implement the bacterial water-contact objectives specified in the 1997 California Ocean Plan,which was in effect at the time Order No. 98-5 was adopted. Specifically, Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. requires that certain total and fecal coliform bacterial objectives shall be maintained within the nearshore zone and within the offshore zone to a depth of 10 feet to protect the water contact recreational use of those waters. The requirement to maintain the objectives to the 10-foot depth in offshore waters was based on the Regional Board's finding that it is the surface waters of the offshore zone to a depth of 10 feet that are used for water contact recreation. Due to the location of the outfall (at 55 in depth and approximately 8.2 km (5.1 miles) offshore of the Huntington Beach area,just north of the Santa Ana River) and the ocean characteristics around the outfall, disinfection of the wastewater has not been necessary to maintain compliance with these objectives. In recent years, the waters off Huntington Beach have been plagued periodically with high concentrations of bacteria that have resulted in the posting and closure of the beaches to water- contact recreation. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the source(s) of the problem. To date, none of these studies has directly linked the problem to OCSD's wastewater discharge. However, recent monitoring work conducted by OCSD has detected low levels of total coliform bacteria, related to the discharge plume, at the surface at a sampling station about three miles from shore. The results also showed plume-related bacteria within one half mile of shore in the deep waters of a submarine canyon (Newport Canyon). Although neither the limitations in Order No. 98-5 nor the A.B. 411 bacterial standards for beach waters; were exceeded, Board staff believes that, based on these recent findings, it is prudent to require the disinfection of the wastewater, and to modify the bacterial limits contained in Order No. 98-5 to ensure that water-contact recreational activities in both offshore and nearshore ocean waters are not threatened by this discharge. This proposed amendment would require the implementation of disinfection facilities using sodium hypochlorite (chlorine bleach) and dechlorination facilities using sodium bisulfite, since disinfection/dechlorination in this manner can be most readily implemented in the short-term. Further,this proposed amendment would revise Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. to require that the bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column in the offshore zone,rather than in only the top ten feet OCSD has not objected to the proposed disinfection requirements. Temporary chlorination/dechlorination facilities are expected to be operational by August 12, 2002. OCSD is conducting an evaluation of alternative, long-term disinfection strategies. The temporary chlorination/dechlorination facilities may eventually be supplanted by a more permanent solution,which may include use of an alterative disinfection agent. Revision of the disinfection requirements can be considered in the future, if warranted by the results of OCSD's investigations. ' The Ocean Plan stipulates that the bacterial objectives apply to the nearshore zone and to those areas outside that zone used for water contact sports,as determined by the Regional Board. ' These standards include total and fecal coliform, as well as entcrococcus, another type of bacterial indicator. The Ocean Plan and A.B 411 standards for total and fecal coliform are very similar. SlaffRepon Page 5 of u Order No.R8-2002-0055,Amending Order No. 98-5 Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 OCSD's stated operational goal with the disinfection process is to achieve both the Ocean Plan bacterial objectives (as reflected in Order No. 98-5) and the A.B. 411 bacterial standards at the boundary of the Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID) of the discharge. The ZID is approximately a 60- meter radius around the outfall. In light of this, while the proposed amendment would require that compliance with bacterial objectives be achieved throughout the nearshore and offshore zones, it may be appropriate in the future to consider extending the zone of compliance beyond the limit of offshore waters, perhaps to the ZID. To provide data needed to make this detennination, this amendment would require the discharger to submit a proposal for an appropriate investigation. The discharger would be required to implement the investigation upon the Executive Officer's approval. It may be noted that this investigation would be expected to include analyses for enterococcus as well as total and fecal coliforrn so that conformance with A.B. 411 standards can also be evaluated'. These data will be considered in the upcoming renewal of Order No. 98-5, which is expected to be considered in 2003, and may result in a revision of the area in which compliance with bacterial objectives is to be achieved. Wastewater disinfection with chlorine usually produces a chlorine residual. Chlorine and its reaction products are toxic to aquatic life. Since disinfection with chlorine was not contemplated at the time Order No. 98-5 was issued, the permit does not contain any limits on the amount of chlorine residual that may be in the effluent. In conjunction with the amendment of Order No. 98-5 to include requirements for disinfection using chlorine , Order No. 98-5 must be amended to add chlorine residual limits. The California Ocean Plan contains receiving water limits for chlorine residual for the protection of marine aquatic life. The proposed amendment would incorporate effluent limits into Order No. 98-5 that are based on these Ocean Plan water quality objectives. Acute Toxicity Order No. 98-5 contains effluent limits and testing requirements for acute toxicity that are based on the 1997 Ocean Plan, which was in effect at the time of permit adoption. The 1997 Ocean Plan specified the use of freshwater test organisms to determine compliance with acute toxicity limits. ° The proposed amendment does not require compliance with the A.H. 411 standards, but instead relies on the bacterial objectives in the Ocean Plan. The Ocean Plan may be revised in the future to include enterococcus objectives; in that case, further amendment of the Order would be necessary. There are also practical considerations that make it unreasonable to impose enterococcus limits at this time. Given holding time considerations,an alternative to the approved standard method would have to be utilized for the numerous samples collected offshore. The use of this alternative method is appropriate for research investigations but not for compliance purposes. StafReport Page 4 of 5 Order No. R8-1001-0055,Amending Order No. 98-5 Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No. 1 The Ocean Plan has been revised since Order No. 98-5 was adopted. The current version of the Ocean Plan became effective on December 3, 2001 (2001 Ocean Plan). The new Ocean Plan revised the procedures to develop acute toxicity limits in permits and changed the testing protocols for determining compliance with those limits. Acute toxicity effluent limits are now to be based on the acute toxicity water quality objective that is specified in the Ocean Plan. In addition,the Ocean Plan now requires the use of marine test species instead of freshwater species when measuring compliance. The proposed amendment would revise the acute toxicity effluent limits and testing procedures in Order No.98-5 to conform to those specified in the 2001 Ocean Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Order No. 118-2002-0055,as presented. Comments were solicited from the following agencies: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Permits Issuance Section(W7R-5)-Terry Oda U.S.Army District,Los Angeles, Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Carlsbad State Water Resources Control Board, Office of the Chief Counsel—Jorge Leon State Water Resources Control Board,Division of Water Quality-James Maughan State Department of Health Services,Carpenteria—John Curphey State Department of Health Services, Carpenteria-Jeff Stone State Department of Water Resources- Glendale State Department of Fish and Game - Long Beach Orange County Water District-Nira Yamachika Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority-Joseph Grindstaff Surfrider Foundation,Huntington/Long Beach Chapter Orange County Coastkeeper- Garry Brown Lawyers for Clean Water C/c San Francisco Baykeeper Dr.Jack Skinner City of Anaheim City of Brea City of Buena Park Costa Mesa Sanitary District City of Cypress City of Fountain Valley City of Fullerton City of Garden Grove City of Huntington Beach Irvine Ranch Water District City of La Habra City of La Palma Staff Report Page 5 of Order No.R8-1002-0055,Amending Order No. 98-5 Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plain No. I and Treatment Plant No. 2 County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County City of Long Beach Rossmoor/Los Alamitos Area Sewer District Midway Cities Sanitation District City of Newport Beach City of Orange City of Placentia City of Santa Ana City of Seal Beach City of Stanton Sunset Beach Sanitary District City of Tustin City of Villa Park City of Westminster Yorba Linda Water District Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Air Forces Reserve Center Los Alamitos California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Order No.R8-2002-0055 Amending Order No.98-5,NPDES No. CA0110604 Waste Discharge Requirements And Authorization to Discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No.1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 Orange County The California Regional Water Quality Control Boar ant a 'o (h - a B d), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(herei aft r EP d t: v 1. On March 6, 1998, the o d ad No. 5 d on a 19 8 U.S. Environmental Protecti n c , Region 'gn D S 't o. 01 0604, renewing the waste di arge uir is fo th Coi knt3 S tatio Dis 'c Orange County no o as oun ani *oi i E ism , h inafter OCSD or discharg ean 1 disc of c b' p 'nary and secondary treated sat at fr its ec am . Pl t o. d Tr 1 mfnt Plant No.2. 2 o 985 mn ' rec g imits designed to protect the health of?eople It in coats th ocean waters (both nearshore and offshore waters ) that ed b e SD effluent discharge. Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. at er bacterial objectives shall be maintained within the nearshore zone and thin the offshore zone to a depth of 10 feet to protect the water contact recreational e of those waters. The requirement to maintain the objectives to the 10-foot depth in offshore waters was based on the Regional Board's finding that the waters in the top 10 feet of the offshore zone are used for water contact recreation. Due to the location of the outfall (at 55 to depth and approximately 8.2 Ian (5.1 miles) offshore of the Huntington Beach area,just north of the Santa Ana River) and the ocean characteristics around the outfall, disinfection of the wastewater has not been necessary to maintain compliance with these objectives. The discharge consistently meets these receiving water limits, as shown by receiving water monitoring data. Nearshore waters are within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet form the shoreline or the 30 foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline. Offshore waters are between the nearshore waters and the limit of ocean waters of the State fi.e., three miles from the shoreline.) Order No.Rg-2001-0055,NPDES No. CA0110604 Page 2 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 3. In recent years, the waters off Huntington Beach have been plagued periodically with high concentrations of bacteria that have resulted in the posting and closure of the beaches to water-contact recreation. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the source(s) of the problem. To date, none of these studies has directly linked the problem to OCSD's wastewater discharge. However, recent monitoring work conducted by OCSD has detected low levels of total coliform bacteria, related to the discharge plume, at the surface at a sampling station about three miles from shore. The results also showed plume-related bacteria within one half mile of shore in the deep waters of a submarine canyon (Newport Canyon). Althoulph neither the limitations in Order No. 98- 5 nor the bacteria] standards for beach waters established by the Department of Health Services (DHS) pursuant to Assembly Bill (A.B.) 411 were exceeded, it is prudent to require disinfection of the wastewater using sodium hypochlorite as the disinfection agent, and dechlorination of the wastewater using sodium bisulfite, since disinfection/dechlorination in this manner can be implemented most readily in the short- term. Further, it is prudent to modify the bacterial limits contained in Order No. 98-5 to ensure that water-contact recreational activities in both offshore and nearshore ocean waters are not threatened by this discharge. This proposed amendment requires the implementation of chlorination (using sodium hypochlorite)/dechlorination (using sodium bisulfite) facilities, and revises Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. to require that the bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column in the offshore zone,rather than in only the top ten feet.. 4. OCSD has not objected to disinfection/dechlorination of the wastewater and, at least initially, will use, sodium hypochlorile (bleach) as the disinfection agent. Sodium bisulfite will be used to dechlorinate the wastewater. These interim facilities are expected to commence operations by August 12, 2002. OCSD is conducting an evaluation of long- term disinfection alternatives, which may result in recommendations for future revision of the cHorination/dechlorination requirements to implement an alternative disinfection strategy. 5. Wastewater disinfection with chlorine usually produces a chlorine residual. Chlorine and its reaction products are toxic to aquatic life. Since disinfection with chlorine was not contemplated at the time Order No. 98-5 was issued, the permit does not contain any limits on the amount of chlorine residual that may be in the effluent. In conjunction with- the amendment of Order No. 98-5 to include requirements for disinfection using chlorine, Order No. 98-5 must be amended to add chlorine residual limits. ' These standards include total and fernl coliform, as well as enterococcus, another type of bacterial indicator. The Ocean Plan and A.B.411 standards for total and fecal colijorm are very similar. California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Order No. R8-2002-0055 Amending Order No. 98-5,NPDES No. CA0110604 Waste Discharge Requirements And Authorization to Discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No.I and Treatment Plant No. 2 Orange County The California Regional Water Quality Control Boar ant a 'o0* 0range d), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(herei aft Ell d t 1. On March 6, 1998, the o d ado d No. 5 d on .S. Environmental Protecti n c , Region 'gn th D S p04, renewing the waste di urge u' is fo th Co S 'tati County (no o as oun am do 'stric , or discharg teen all disc of bi pri ary and secondary treated sat at its ec am do PI t o. d T tm6tPlamNo. 2. 2 985 on 'n rec v g imits designed to protect the health of 4eople ho in co to th ocean waters (both nearshore and offshore waters ) that ec ed by a SD effluent discharge. Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. at er bacterial objectives shall be maintained within the nearshore zone and [thin the offshore zone to a depth of 10 feet to protect the water contact recreational e of those waters. The requirement to maintain the objectives to the 10-foot depth in offshore waters was based on the Regional Board's finding that the waters in the top 10 feet of the offshore zone are used for water contact recreation. Due to the location of the outfall (at 55 m depth and approximately 8.2 Ian (5.1 miles) offshore of the Huntington Beach area,just north of the Santa Ana River) and the ocean characteristics around the outfall, disinfection of the wastewater has not been necessary to maintain compliance with these objectives. The discharge consistently meets these receiving water limits, as shown by receiving water monitoring data. Nwnhore waters are within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet form the shoreline or the 30 jaot depth contour, whichever it further from the shoreline. Offshore waters are between the nearshore waters and the limit of ocean waters of the State (i.e., three miler from the shoreline.) Order No.R8-10024055,NPDES No. C40110604 Page 2 of e Orange County Sanitation DishlcYs Redamation Plant Ne.1 and Treannent Plant No.2 y 3. In recent years, the waters off Huntington Beach have been plagued periodically with high concentrations of bacteria that have resulted in the posting and closure of the beaches to water-contact recreation. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the source(s) of the problem. To date, none of these studies has directly linked the problem to OCSD's wastewater discharge. However, recent monitoring work conducted by OCSD has detected low levels of total coliform bacteria, related to the discharge plume, at the surface at a sampling station about three miles from shore. The results also showed plume-related bacteria within one half mile of shore in the deep waters of a submarine canyon (Newport Canyon). Althouln neither the limitations in Order No. 98- 5 nor the bacterial standards for beach waters established by the Department of Health Services (DHS) pursuant to Assembly Bill (A.B.) 411 were exceeded, it is prudent to require disinfection of the wastewater using sodium hypocblorite as the disinfection agent, and dechlorination of the wastewater using sodium bisulfite, since disinfection/dechlorination in this manner can be implemented most readily in the short- term. Further, it is prudent to modify the bacterial limits contained in Order No. 98-5 to ensure that water-contact recreational activities in both offshore and nearshore ocean waters are not threatened by this discharge. This proposed amendment requires the implementation of chlorination (using sodium hypochloriteydechlorination (using sodium bisulfite) facilities, and revises Receiving Water Limitation D.l.a.l. to require that the bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column in the offshore zone,rather than in only the top ten feet.. 4. OCSD has not objected to disinfection/dechlorination of the wastewater and, at least initially, will use, sodium hypochlorite (bleach) as the disinfection agent. Sodium bisulfite will be used to dechlorinate the wastewater. These interim facilities are expected to commence operations by August 12,2002. OCSD is conducting an evaluation of long- term disinfection alternatives, which may result in recommendations for future revision of the chlorination/dechlorination requirements to implement an alternative disinfection strategy. 5. Wastewater disinfection with chlorine usually produces a chlorine residual. Chlorine and its reaction products are toxic to aquatic life. Since disinfection with chlorine was not contemplated at the time Order No. 98-5 was issued, the permit does not contain any limits on the amount of chlorine residual that may be in the effluent. In conjunction with the amendment of Order No.98-5 to include requirements for disinfection using chlorine, Order No. 98-5 must be amended to add chlorine residual limits. 1 There standards include total and fecal colifa m, as well as enterococcus, another type of bacterial indicator. The Ocean Plan and A.B. 411 standards for total and fecal coliform are very similar. Order No.R8-2001-0055,NPDES No. CA0110604 Page 3 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No.2 6. OCSD's stated operational goal with the disinfection process is to achieve both the Ocean Plan bacterial objectives (as reflected in Order No. 98-5) and the A.B. 411 bacterial - standards at the boundary of the Zone of Initial Dilution(ZID)of the discharge. The ZID is approximately a 60-meter radius around the outfall. In light of this,while the proposed amendment would require that compliance with bacterial objectives be achieved throughout the nearshore and offshore zones, it may be appropriate in the future to consider extending the zone of compliance beyond the limit of offshore waters, perhaps to the ZID. To provide data needed to make this determination, this amendment would require the discharger to submit a proposal for an appropriate investigation. The discharger would be required to implement the investigation upon the Executive Officer's approval. It may be noted that this investigation would be expected to include analyses for enterococcus as well as total and fecal coliform so that conformance with A.B. 411 standards can also be evaluated'. These data will be considered in the upcoming renewal of Order No. 98-5, which is expected to be considered in 2003, and may result in a revision of the area in which compliance with bacterial objectives is to be achieved. 7. Order No. 98-5 also specified acute toxicity limits and test requirements based on the 1997 Ocean Plan. The acute toxicity requirements in the 1997 Ocean Plan were based on best available technology. Since the adoption of Order No. 98-5, the 1997 Ocean Plan has been revised A new Ocean Plan became effective on December 3, 2001 (2001 Ocean Plan). The new Ocean Plan revised the procedures to develop acute toxicity limits in permits and changed the testing protocols for determining compliance with those limits. Acute toxicity effluent limits are now to be based on the acute toxicity water quality objective that is specified in the Ocean Plan. In addition, the Ocean Plan now requires the use of marine test species instead of freshwater species when measuring compliance. It is appropriate to revise the acute toxicity limits and testing protocols specified in Order No.98-5 to be consistent with the 2001 Ocean Plan. 8. In accordance with Water Code Section 13389 of the California Water Code, the amendment of Order No. 98-5,NPDES No. CAM 10604,is exempt from those provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act contained in Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 21100),Division 13 of the Public Resources Code. 9. On June 19, 2002, the Regional Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency notified the discharger and other interested agencies and persons of their intent to amend/modify the waste discharge requirements and authorization to discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for the discharge and provided them with an opportunity to submit their written views and recommendations. 3 The proposed amendment does not require compliance with the A.B. 411 standards, but instead relies on the bacterial objectives in the Ocean Plan. The Ocean Plan may be revised in the future to include enterococcus objectives,;in that case,further amendment of the Order would be necessary. There are also practical consideradons that make it unreasonable to impose enierococcus limits at this time. Given holding time considerations, an alternative to the approved standard method would have to be utilized far the numerous samples collected offshore. The use of this anemadve method is appropriate for research investigations but cot for compliance purposes. Order No.R0-2002-0055,NPDES No. CA0110604 Page 4 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's Redamotion Plant No. 1 and Treatment Ptant No. 2 10. The Regional Board and the EPA, in a public hearing on July 19, 2002 will hear and consider all comments pertaining to the discharge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Order No. 98-5 shall be amended as follows: 1. Discharge Specification A.1.b. - Delete limitations for acute toxicity as follows (Language deleted is shown in double stn7ce out type): b. Major Wastewater Constituents and Properties Limitations Constituent Units 30-day Average 7-day Average Maximum at any time Grease and oil mgtl 25 40 75 ]bs/day5 61,500 98,400 184,000 Suspended Solids n/a As 30-day average,75%removal from influent stream or 60 mg/l,whichever rate is higher Settleable Solids MIA 1.0 1.5 3.0 Turbidity NTU 75 100 225 PH units Within 6.0 to 9.0 at all times Ae it»g Pia 44 BA 24 2. Discharge Specification A.l.d. -Add limitations for total residual chlorine and acute toxicity as follows(Language added is in bold type and highlighted): d. Toxic Materials Limitations for the Protection of Marine Aquatic Life Constituent Units 6-month Median Daily Maximum Instantaneous Maximum Totsl tesiil r0<'gloljq�'e tyg/1 Q 9¢ ;AS Aooitto-A dY Wa V W4 Chronic Toxicity TUC n/a 181 n/a Radioactivity Not to exceed limitations specified in Title 17,Division 1,Chapter 5, Subchapter 4,Group 3,Article 3,Section 32069 3035 of the CCR 5 Mau emission rates based on a d endo injecte - P ! fpermit annual average u'fluentflow of295 MGD. ' Order No.R&2002-0055,NPDES No-CA17170604 Page 5 of 9 Orange County Sanitarian District's Reclamation Plant No.I and Treatment Plant No.2 3. Acute and Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Requirements B.l.a. - Revise as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted,language deleted is shown in double strike out type): a. Test Species and Methods The discharger shall conduct monthly tests with the following vertebrate and invertebrate species for the first three tests. After this screening period, quarterly tests shall be conducted with the most sensitive species. 1) Vertebrate: at%lie 2) Invertebrate:Wag Pser`ti'icfy', d' 3'; - Every year, the discharger shall re-screen during one quarterly test, at different times than the prior year(s) and continue to monitor with the most sensitive species. For?l� isq hia, the presence of acute toxicity shall be estimated usm a 96 ho r static test, as specified in poi For , `,'�' °(ur,`a• , the presence of acute toxicity shall be estimated using a 96-hour static test, as specified "ethods or Measurin the Acute Toxicity of EfJluenrs to Aquatic Organisms Mow 1 4. Acute and Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Requirements B.l.b. - Revise as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted, language deleted is in double strike out type): b. Definition of Acute Toxicity Acute toxicity in effluents shall be measured using a multi-concentration test, consisting of a control and a minimum of five effluent concentrations. The tests are designed to provide dose-response information, expressed as the percent effluent concentration that is lethal to 50 percent of the test organisms (LC50) within the prescribed period of time(24-96 hours). Test results shall be reported in TUa, where TUa= 100/LC50. For this discharge, acute toxicity is defined by an exceedance of an acute toxicity effluent limitation specified in Discharge Specification A.1.0 b. Order No.RB-2002-0055,NPOES No. C40110600 Page 6 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's , Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No,2 5. Receiving Water Limitations D.l.a.l) - Revise as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted,language deleted is in double strike out type): 1) Water-Contact Standards Within the Nearshore and ffshore Zon ;M kelp beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: 6. Required Notices and Reports-Add new paragraph number 10.as follows: 10. Within 30-days of the effective date of this Order, the discharger shall file with the Regional Board a written proposal to conduct an investigation of the effects of the discharge on the bacterial quality of the ocean waters between the zone of initial dilution (ZID) boundary and offshore waters. This investigation shall be designed to tolled data needed to evaluate whether and where compliance with the bacterial limitations in this Order and the bacterial standards established by the DHS pursuant to A.B. 411 can be consistently achieved. The proposal shall include time schedules for conducting the investigations. 7. provisions - Revise paragraph H.5 as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted): 5. The discharger shall com I with M&RP No 98 5 0 #he'Saecutive twfe; 10 n _ oRn18 anbe L. 9 e .tp ryP°P&`R(f ei�tn*e<ReA1s n Oc aty, c arm tLdu f+ir an- 40ie. omioring„Re'�uc o �* �-fittency hf' mITT 01 16 resi xYi1` . e31+ � .�ifiy"' o)Jowrug a n ,Iztu o a 'a die Fodet ,t :d , "� ":: n, t _ to b r T T Bid crc b-f ee1�-. .� �d i$n t` e� i�x`con tlet d h +7 - t�RCarm nrtttS r�11nS. rrtia. 4,.Wisrd, �°K�zfolr a EXe1a5 en :G eH�ltiat momfonng aaYa fgr the'last b months show, 'JI ance with effluent, l Into mis. Order No.R8-2002-0055,NPDES No. CA0110604 Page 7 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's ' Reclamation Plant No.I and Treatment Plant No.2 d. Should any,o�the daily wabkly,'monthly. or quarterly monitoring show e tuentzrpi�cenaauons alw.yq�.A,e: emnenc- ligpir flrc;lfreyuency of mOmtO rirJgfg1 fot chlog residual steal{ e inoreaspd to"(tally or weekly @s dttoct�t6ytpe Fai 8. Provision-Add new paragraph number 22.as follows: 22. The discharger shall install and implement chlorination (using sodium hypochlorite) and dechlorination (using sodium bisulfite) facilities for the disinfection of the wastewater. By March 1, 2003, the discharger shall submit a report that describes the results of the discharger's investigation of alternative disinfection methods and the plan and schedule for pilot testing of selected alternatives. The discharger shall implement this plan upon approval by the Regional Board's Executive Officer. This Order may be reopened to revise the disinfection requirements if warranted by the results of these investigations. 9. Provision-Add new paragraph number 23. as follows: 23. Upon approval of the investigation program required in Required Notices and Reports G.10. above, the discharger shall implement the program. 10. Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 98-5, Influent and Effluent Monitoring - Revise paragraph B.2. and Table (table partially shown with the new changes) as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted): 2. The following constituents shall be monitored in the influent and effluent, except for settleable solids,turbidity,pH, fy ,rg 1palic11p1RR, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, radioactivity, and TCDD equivalents which shall be monitored only in the effluent. settleable solids MIA grab daily monthly Tgta1*WWW . 1�'2k � c PY turbidity NTU 24 hr. composite monthly monthly i Order No.Re-2002-0055,NPDES Na CA0110001 Page 8 of 9 Orange County Saturation Disdat's Redamatiot Plant Na 1 and Treatment Plant No.2 11. Monitoring and Repotting Program No. 98-5, Receiving Water Monitoring requirement D.l.b. - Revise the paragraph immediately following the subject title "Offshore Water Quality Monitoring"and add new paragraph as follows(Language added is in bold type and highlighted,language deleted is in double strike out type): Offshore water quality monitoring data are used to determine compliance with receiving water limitations, State water quality standards, and to assist in the interpretation of biological data The Ocean Plan establishes quantitative water quality objectives for dissolved oxygen, light transmittance, and pH, as well as qualitative objectives for floating particulates, grease and oil,and discoloration of the ocean surface. The Regional Board has determined that the surface waters of the Offshore Zone, to a depth of 10 ft, are used for water contact recreation. lo�ygZsye Regrooal Boa;Ord apt EPllave determined ahat3t is sppra Ytate,Eo apply 5acfe�r a7 SfanHi rds throe big-the water colu® lu the offsl ore zoiie to assure`th'at the dischargedoes not pope 4 thr"T to vvaVr coptaet recre86ona1 uses. 12. Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 98-5, Receiving Water Monitoring requirement D.I.b. - Revise the paragraph between Table RWM-1- and Table RWM-2 as follows (Language added is in bold type and highlighted, language deleted is in double strike out type): At each station,a secchi disk shall be used to assess transparency,and visual observations of surface waters shall be noted. Temperature, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), light transmittance, photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), and chlorophyll-a shall be measured at 1 in intervals throughout the entire water column to 2 in above the bottom at each station using a CTD with attached meters (for pH, DO, light transmittance, PAR, chlorophyll-a). All station depths shall be surveyed for actual bottom depth. At stations greater than 75 in,profiles shall be sampled to a maximum depth of 75 in. Grab samples for ammonia-nitrogen, total colif rim organisms, and Escherichia coli shall be collected at discrete depths from 1 in below surface, 5 in, 10 in, 15 in,etc.,to 2 in above the bottom or to a maximum depth of 60 in. For the purposes of determining compliance with Receiving Water Limitation D.I.a.l.b, five samples for total coliform organisms and Escherichio coli shall be collected a4 1 m beia i, the surfaac at six stations (Sr4; 4-4p� d-�4 (?db3x d `2`L09,21U3,21Q4 and-Ci)it discrete'depths 6Psted iu Ima`t*m 400 or60 m. 13. All other conditions and requirements of Order No. 98-5 shall remain unchanged. 14. This Order shall take effect on August 12,2002. Order No.R8-2002-0055,NPDES No.CA0110604 Page 9 of 9 Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No. I and Treatment Plant No.2 I, Gerard J. Tbibeault, Executive Officer, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of Order No. R8-2002-0055 adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region,on July 19, 2002. Gerard J. Thibeault Executive Officer California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region I, Alexis Strauss, Director, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of modifications to NPDES Permit No. CA0110604 adopted by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, on July 19, 2002. Alexis Strauss,Director Water Division U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region Dt May 28,2002 PAC2 Workshop H5 Alternative Evaluation Table Comments and Questions. I. Alternative treatment D,employing microfiltration technology following advanced secondary treatment was not an option that was ever under consideration during the 1999 strategic plan,or the GRS project technical planning phase. Why is the OCSD staff choosing to place this alternative on the table now? 2. How many otter POT W's are using this technology?How many in Southern California are using this technology or considering using it?Why don't we have other partners to help us finance the development of this R&D project(San Diego,Golita)? 3. Total Coliform Levels<I,000(Public Health column)assumes that the chemical disinfection(chlorine) beach scale testing that OCSD is currently conducting is successful in demonstrating both to the County Health Care Agency,and the Regional Water Quality Control Board that such a procedure is protective of both marine life and public health.Additionally,an EB2/EIS should be generated,and public comment solicited before any commitment to this alternative is made.Contrary to what the public has been led to believe by premature and inaccurate press releases,OCSD does NOT have the unilateral authority to use this technology. 4. If the retention time in the OCSD treatment system is insufficient for chemical(chlorine) disinfection,and de-chlorination,then additional structures most be constructed in order to use this technology.The cost impact,particularly for alternatives A&B,is not insignificant,and is not reflected in the"cost effectiveness"tables? 5. The projected TSS(Water Quality)for alternative B(50/50 blend)is 39mg/L?presently it is about 5lmg/L.at a 50/50 blend.How is OCSD planning to achieve a 20% improvement in advanced primary suspended solids removal efficiency?How long will it take to achieve this goal?How much will it cost? 6. Virus levels(public health)are estimated from the 1999 strategic plan.Can't we get more recent supporting data for these values from the bench scale tests? 7. Energy costs at OCSD are currently$0.037 per KWHr.The average home owner pays about$0.08 per KWHr.The energy use cost in terms of equivalent homes is therefore less than one�half of that indicated in the Environmental Impacts table("Equivalent Homes").There are approx. 1,000,000 equivalent units(homes)in the district.Thus,the energy usage cost impact to the ratepayer for any of the alternatives is about one percent. 8. The current OCSD NPDES permit with the 301(h)waiver allows a suspended solids mass emission rate of 20,000 metric tons per year with a re-opener provision to allow them to go to 30,000 metric tons per year.The present suspended solids emission rate at OCSD is about 17,000 metric tons per year,and has been relatively stable at this value for the past several years.This permit limit represents an increase of 18%and 75% respectively.Conversly,the relative impact on county landfill capacity and basin air quality(VOC emissions)with respect to the assimilative capacity of land and air resources for any of the other alternatives is less than 1%.The tables included in the summary statement comparing the alternatives as"lower or higher"or"more or less"are not quantified.Aby decision based on this table alone would be a gross error ofjudgment. 9. There is areal problem in understanding how the`Pair rate policies"recommended by the rate advisory committee is being implemented at the District.For example,why is the G WRS considered a"water supply for existing users"when,in fact it is required because of the rapid growth of population of"new users"in North Orange County?Why are large developers allowed to buy in to our"Publicly Owned Treatment Works"at substantially less than the fair market value,or replacement cost of the Districts facilities? Why are large entertainment users given a discount from a policy that is supposed to charge according to"Bow and strength"?Out of what budget does the expense for a political lobbyist for OCSD staff come from?(ratepayers or connection fees?). 10. As one of the Board members has recently stated,"the Sanitation District issues are much to complicated for the average citizen to understand."It is also far too complex and important of an issue to leave to a Board of Directors who do not have the technical, legal or financial backround to make an informed decision on these issues. 11. The CDM staff,and OCSD representatives at these workshops should be commended for attempting to reduce these issues in a few pages of text in a language that our Board of Directors can understand. Don Schulz Member OCSD PAC2 CC:Norm Eckemode STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on , 20W, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ./,I&,< —0 2002 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this -;v-Z;rday of 2003. Penny M. K e, Secret Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District GAWRDTAWMIMBSWORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT June 19, 2002 Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) Board secretary To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors inform: 0141962-2411 Subject: Board Letter he (714)962M5e "" .ocn0.. The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional wel6r,add. information on any of the items, please call me. Pe. 80.8127 Fountean Valley.ok 92T2aE12) Orange Coast Watch Becks Disinfection 1 Arroue Founte nt alie ft CA VNIw.ra Let's start with some good news. We have received a letter from Matt Hagemann, 927e8-7018 Executive Director of Orange Coast Watch, urging "the District and regulators to pursue an expedited permitting process so that disinfection can commence as soon Wani,r as possible." Thank you, Coast Watch, we certainly agree! A copy of their letter is Agencies attached. • Citi.. Please also note that Mr. Hagemann urges us to move to secondary treatment A O standards to improve the efficiency of disinfection and for the sake of the ocean. Bra.Brea Buena Perk cypress A Report Card for Orange County Infrastructure... Fountain Valley Fullenan carc.n 6 .e The American Society of Civil Engineers,the California Rebuild America Coalition M,ncngron Beach and UCI Civil and Environmental Engineering Affiliates are in the process of Le Badse&. developing an infrastructure report card for Orange County. They will evaluate eight L. Palme infrastructure categories: Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange . Transportation Placentia , Water Bane Ane Boni Beach . Wastewater Tunon ch . Flood Control/Urban Runoff vg.Park . Schools gnu. I,nde . Solid Waste County of orange . Aviation . Parks and Recreation Facilities sanitew m.cdcta Gaate Maya These areas will be graded A through F. The objective of providing a letter grade for muhy-y Gry each of these categories is to build understanding and support for dedicated and Water Districts consistent sources of funding for infrastructure facilities at levels sufficient to sustain them here in Orange County. The report card will be developed by a qualified group Irvin.Ranch of technical experts drawn from around the county for each of the categories. A review council made up of stakeholders and senior managers will evaluate the technical experts'findings. Finally, an executive committee made up of public agency CEOs and GMs will marshal the publicity, planning, and advocacy efforts to make the report card's release as effective as possible. To meincem wand-Clean leadership in wastewater and water resource management. Members of the Board Page 2 June 19,2002 These eight infrastructure categories will be graded on existing conditions of the facilities, existing and planned capacity of the facilities to meet present and future service demands, and existing competency of operation of the facilities. For wastewater facilities,this boils down to whether or not the sewers, pump stations, and treatment plants here in Orange County are operational and in good repair, meet the service demands of the community, meet the terms and conditions of the permits currently in place, and that staffing and financial resources are adequate to maintain competent operation. do not know the present state of all eight infrastructure categorical efforts. But I do know about the wastewater piece. Field surveys and data gathering are now underway. By the end of July the data will be compiled and evaluated by a technical committee. That work will be evaluated by the review council in mid-August. The executive committee will finalize the overall report in late August or early September. Release of the report card is planned for the fall. ...And Paving for Infrastructure To no one's surprise, infrastructure replacement and upgrades here in Orange County will be expensive. Our 20-year capital spending program will cost between $1.6 and$1.9 billion, depending upon the treatment technology the board of directors decides to select for the future. Local sewer upgrades and improvements by the cities will cost between $0.5 and $2.0 billion during the next 20 years, county-wide. Add to that the much needed rehabilitation and improvements to roads, freeways, parks, schools, public buildings,stonnwater and urban runoff, and potable water systems. No one has a comprehensive county-wide handle on all of that at the moment. But the Governor just released a five-year infrastructure improvement plan that identifies the amount of spending necessary to upgrade and rehabilitate public facilities. It totals$56 billion for transportation, schools, parks, public housing, water, natural resource protection and other public works. The per capita cost is approximately$300 per year per person. And where will that money come from? Certainly not from state coffers when we're already looking at a $23 billion deficit this year. It's easy for us to make the mistake of focusing only on wastewater treatment financial issues, particularly as we spend so much time and energy talking about the matters that are so close at hand this month. I would ask you to keep all of the public spending in store for Orange County citizens and businesses in mind as you deliberate the question of level of treatment. Summer 2002 Urban Runoff Diversions The District approved the Orange County Flood Control District's(OCFCD) request as it has since 1999, to discharge dry weather urban runoff into the District's sewer Members of the Board Page 3 June 19, 2002 system during the period of May 24, 2002 through September 14, 2002. As part of OCFCD's dry weather urban runoff plan for Huntington Beach's coastal waters, temporary diversion systems were installed in the Santa Ana River, Greenville- Banning, and Talbert channels and a Huntington Beach Pump Station during the week of May 20, 2002 and were activated on May 24, 2002 before Memorial weekend. Similar to last summer,the temporary diversion systems in the channels consist of a concrete block dam, submersible pump, and PVC pipelines. With a collective daily flow average of 1.4 million gallons of dry weather urban runoff a day, these diversion systems will be connected to either the City of Huntington Beach's sewer line or directly into the District's sewer system. As part of the District's dry weather urban runoff discharge requirements, OCFCD agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the District's Dry Weather Urban Runoff Policy, Resolution OCSD 01-07, and Urban Runoff Agreement, D01-105. Progress Report on Divertina a "Hot" Storm Drain The District's Phase III onshore investigation and the University of California, Irvine's Santa Ana River Mouth Study, which were conducted in the summer 2001, have identified that urban runoff discharged into the mouth of the Santa Ana River from a storm drain system along the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) contains extremely high concentration of bacteria that exceeds the Ocean Water Posting and Closure Guidelines (AB 411 standards)for recreational contact. The storm drain system collects runoff from the Newport Shores neighborhood in Newport Beach and PCH. In response to the findings from the District's onshore investigation and UCI's study, the District and Caltrans embarked on a joint collaborative effort to address the runoff contained in the PCH storm drain system. On May 13, 2002, the District and Caltrans conducted a visual inspection of the storm drain system and discovered that a tidal gate attached at the end of the storm drain, which was blocked by a natural and temporary buildup of beach sand, impeded the discharge of the urban runoff contained in the storm drain system. Acting like a detention basin, the blocked storm drain, according to Caltrans' staff, was estimated to contain approximately 90,000 gallons of stagnant runoff. Because of the potential public health impacts associated with the possible discharge of 90,000 gallons of untreated urban runoff flowing into the lower mouth of Santa Ana River(high recreational area), the District authorized Caltrans, on May 23, 2002,to discharge the urban runoff into the District's s sewer system for proper treatment and disposal. Caltrans' crew successfully siphoned approximately 95, 000 gallons of urban runoff from the PCH storm drain and discharged the runoff into the District's Plant 2 interplant line for treatment in time before the Memorial Day weekend. r Members of the Board Page 4 June 19, 2002 Caltrans is scheduled to clean-out the solids that remain in the PCH storm drain systems, which will not be discharged into the District's sewer system to purge and prime the storm drain system for the installation of a dry weather diversion system. The District, Caltrans, City of Newport Beach, and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control are currently in the planning stages to construct a permanent diversion system. We are interested in an early fix. Collecting Fees Related to Stormwater May Require a Ballot Measure The appellate court ruling on the long-awaited Proposition 218 Case—Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association vs. City of Salinas will make urban runoff management more difficult. On June 1, 1999,the City of Salinas adopted a resolution imposing a "Stormwater Management Utility fee" to property owners to finance the improvement of storm and surface water management facilities. The fee would be imposed on "users of the stormwater drainage system." Subsequently, on September 15, 1999, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association challenged the City of Salinas's resolution, contending that the fee was a 'property related"fee requiring voter approval, pursuant to Proposition 218. The trial court ruled in favor of the City that the fee did not violate this provision because (1) it was not a property-related fee, and (2) it met the exemption for fees for sewer and water services. Jarvis appealed the case on February 16, 2002 to the Court of Appeal of the Sixth Appellate District. On June 3, 2002, the appellate court ruled in favor of the Jarvis, reversing the trial court's order. The appellate court stated that the City's property-related fee was subject to voter approval by property owners or by residents of the affected area, pursuant to Proposition 218 requirements. The Attorney General echoed Jarvis' position that the stormwater management system is distinct from the sanitary sewer system and the industrial waste management system, and as a result is not exempt from the voter approval requirement, pursuant to Proposition 218. Coastal cities and sanitation districts that have developed and implemented urban runoff management programs to manage urban runoff pollution may impose fees on property owner or residents for this service. However, because of the appellate court's ruling described above, the local cities and sanitation districts that propose to establish a stormwater and/or urban runoff management utility fee may be subject to Proposition 218 voter approval requirements. In other words, we may have to put the issue on a service area-wide ballot measure to collect fees. Members of the Board Page 5 June 19, 2002 The attached memo from Tom Woodruff,General Counsel, provides more information about the court ruling. Outfall Ballast Maintenance Work Begins On July 8, 2002, we will begin a maintenance project to reinforce the five-mile, 200- foot deep ocean outfall pipe off of Huntington Beach. The project is expected to last approximately four months and cause minimal disruption to the coastal environment, beach and ocean users and coastal neighbors.This project is a routine maintenance of the existing pipe. The ballast, a protective blanket of rock that absorbs the force of large storm waves on the ouffall pipe, will be strengthened by placing large quarry rocks carried on a barge. The rocks, estimated to range in size from 700 to 1000 pounds, will be added to the existing ballast. In addition to providing wave protection, the ballast also provides protection of the outtall from potential failure due to bottom erosion, undermining and differential settlement of the reinforced concrete section pipes. The existing ballast design was based on waves recorded during the 1939 hurricane which occurred along our coast. It was constructed during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Designed for a lifecycle of 50 years, sixty-five percent of the lifecycle has now expired. Updated modeling work completed in 1998 has indicated the ballast should be enlarged. A public open house regarding the maintenance of the ballast will be held July 1. 2002 at Orange County Sanitation District Plant No. 2, 22212 Brookhurst Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92646. The open house will begin at 6:30 p.m. and end at 8:00 p.m. Kern County Biosolids Ordinance Litigation Uodate In early 2000, several Petitioners, including the District, challenged the validity of Kern County's biosolids ordinance that would ban the land application of Class B biosolids effective January 1, 2003. The first part of this case was decided on November 22, 2000,when the Court denied our California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) claim that Kern County should have performed an Environmental Impact Report, stating that the adoption of a negative declaration was adequate to satisfy CEQA. On June 3, a trial was held on several Constitutional claims. Specifically, the Petitioners claimed that the"biosolids impact fee"of$3.37 per ton, purportedly imposed to offset impacts of biosolids trucks on county roads, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Petitioners also challenged the"Fee"as an illegal tax that violates California Constitutional provisions requiring voter approval Members of the Board Page 6 June 19, 2002 and limiting fees to the reasonable cost of providing the service or regulatory activity. Because the ordinance creates an "undue burden"on the flow of biosolids In interstate commerce,the Petitioners also claimed that the ordinance violates the Commerce Clause provision that denies the power to discriminate against the flow of materials in interstate commerce. At this trial the Judge did not allow testimony, stating that the case was to be decided solely on the evidence found in the written "administrative record"that was compiled prior to the enactment of the ordinance. Our counsel disagrees with the Judge's limitation of evidence to the administrative record for the Constitutional claims. The Petitioners claim that the impacts of the ordinance could not have been anticipated at the time of the compiling of the administrative record. At trial the Judge did allow the Petitioners to draft a brief on the Constitutional issues using additional expert opinion in the form of declarations. The Petitioners brief is due on July 15 with Kern County's reply being due on August 9. Judge Vortmann may enter final judgment as early as mid-August. An appeal would have to be filed within 30 days of his final judgment. Kings County Litigation and Biosolids Manaaement Update OCSD recently filed a lawsuit against Kings County. The lawsuit seeks an injunction to stop Kings County, located in the central part of the state, from enforcing its ban on the land application of Class B biosolids based on several Constitutional provisions. OCSD is also seeking monetary damages based on potential property losses that could result from the countys ordinance. The lawsuit is an appeal of the December 18, 2001 denial by the Kings County Board of Supervisors for an extension of time for the continued use of Class B biosolids on our farm. The extension request was made to fully recover the OCSD's monetary investment and to allow the OCSD the time to develop other biosolids management options. As you may recall,the OCSD purchased the t 800-acre portion of Tule Ranch located in Kings County in June 2000. It is a remote location, situated in the extreme southeastern corner of Kings County. OCSD purchased the property for$3.25 million, approximately$2 million over standard farmland prices. The OCSD paid that premium solely for the unique Regional Water Quality Control Board biosolids land application permit attached to the land. This permit creates a vested right to continue to land apply Class B biosolids. Class B biosolids have been lawfully applied to the property without any adverse impacts to the surrounding community, which consist primarily of agricultural properties. The land was purchased with the reasonable expectation that a pending biosolids ordinance under development by Kings County would allow our long term use of Class B biosolids. Prior to our extending an offer on the land, we had received unequivocal assurances from Kings County staff and members of the Board of Supervisors that the use of Class B biosolids for improving productivity of marginal farmlands was understood and supported. Nevertheless, the Kings County Board of s Members of the Board Page 7 June 19, 2002 Supervisors made a 180-degree about face and voted to ban the use of Class B biosolids effective December 31, 2002. OCSD purchased Tule Ranch in order to maintain this ranch as a viable, cost- effective and environmentally appropriate biosolids management option. As a condition of the purchase, the OCSD's biosolids management costs were immediately decreased from $25.00 per ton to $22.40 per ton on both the Kings and Kern County portions of Tule Ranch. Subsequent increases in fuel costs and inflation have raised these base fees to$25.40 per ton. Nevertheless, this compares very well with the costs for biosolids management by the OCSD's other two contractors Synagro at$39.50 per ton for biosolids land application in San Bernardino County, Arizona and Nevada and Yakima at$33.87 per ton for biosolids land application in Kern County. If you average the biosolids management costs of both Synagro and Yakima It results in a cost of$36.69 per ton, or$11.29 per ton higher cost than managing biosolids at the OCSD farm. Tule Ranch currently manages approximately 65% of the OCSD's 195,000 wet tons of biosolids produced annually. Since the OCSD purchase of Tule Ranch over 65,000 wet tons of OCSD's biosolids have been land applied on the OCSD Kings County ranch and an additional 140,000 tons of biosolids have been managed on the Kern County Tule Ranch acreage. OCSD expects an additional 85,000 tons of biosolids to be managed at Tule Ranch, at significant savings, before the land application of Class B biosolids is banned. OCSD is not alone; other agencies are experiencing similar biosolids management cost increases. For example, the Los Angeles County Sanitation OCSD (LACSD) currently pays$34.00 per wet ton to its largest biosolids management contractor even though LACSD is closer to the San Joaquin Valley than the OCSD. The OCSD biosolids land application permit will continue to have value after a ban on Class B biosolids. Only with a Regional Water Quality Control Board Biosolids General Order Permit can the OCSD apply greater than 10 tons per acre of Class A biosolids. This farm has such a permit. OCSD is in the process of developing a cost- effective Class A process on the site along with pursuing other on-site and off-site Class A biosolids management options. In the meantime, OCSD will continue to successfully manage the 540 tons per day of biosolids it produces, mostly at Tule Ranch. We will do so safely and in full compliance with federal, state and local regulations. It has been OCSD's policy and practice for the last 12 years to have multiple, independent management options always available for this kind of an eventuality. Long-term reliability requires it. The soil, surface water, and groundwater of Kings County are not harmed by OCSD Class B biosolids on its farm. In fact, the soil quality of Tule Ranch will be forever improved by OCSD's product. Crop yield has increased every year since biosolids were first applied to the land. Increased yields are expected in the future. h` Members of the Board Page 8 June 19, 2002 OCSD remains committed to the beneficial use of biosolids. Returning nutrients to farmland while conserving valuable landfill space makes sense for a sustainable economy and a sustainable environment. OCSD will continue to advocate responsible practices that are well regulated and well managed so that the environment is protected. OCSD also remains committed to a good neighbor policy. We will strive for facilities and practices that are respectful of our neighbors and adjoining landowners. We will do what it takes to avoid imposing nuisances or other impacts upon them. It is for this reason that OCSD is careful about the locations and technologies that we use to manage our biosolids. Clean Water Act State Revolving Funds Stalled in Congress The Sanitation District does not rely upon loans from the State Revolving Fund (SRF) program, however, many agencies here in Orange County do. Efforts to renew the federal Clean Water Act's SRF program remain stymied in both the House and Senate. In both chambers the issue remains the application of Davis Bacon provisions (requiring prevailing wages for construction contractors) to SRF- funded projects. In addition,the Senate remains locked in-place over efforts to revise the SRF allocation formula in favor of sparsely populated states. As of this writing, two "holds" have been placed on S. 1961. One hold is the work of Ranking Republican, Bob Smith (R-NH)who has objections over the use of Davis Bacon and the way the Committee on Environment and Public Works revised the SRF allocation formula. New Hampshire loses funding under the new formula. In addition to the debate over how to fashion a new SRF program, President Bush's decision to reorganize the federal government to enhance anti-terrorism programs may have dealt another blow to prospects for a renewed Clean Water Act SRF program as Congress is forced to turn attention to the Bush proposal in addition to the annual appropriations process. Given the extremely limited floor time that is available to both the Senate and House, it is becoming increasingly difficult to envision a controversial bill, like S. 1961, from receiving floor time for debate. While efforts to renew the Clean Water Act continue, the situation as to why it may not be acted on this year can be summarized as follows: 1. Davis Bacon, while an unimportant policy issue in most states that have prevailing wages, including California, approximately 19 states are non-Davis Bacon states that could tie up debate on the Senate floor. In the House,the Republican leadership has publicly stated that legislation containing Davis Bacon mandates will not be considered. 2. S. 1961 contains a modified Significant Noncompliance provisions. The committee considered CASA and others' concerns and amended the language to permit a POTW to receive an SRF loan provided the assistance would bring the POTW into compliance. While this may appear to be Members of the Board Page 9 June 19, 2002 progress, the language still allows states and environmental groups to seek additional mandates under any consent order that is developed. At this writing, the Senate committee staff continues to maintain that the provision is a priority for the Chairman, Jim Jeffords (I-VT). 3. The allocation formula in both the House and Senate favor California. However, smaller states are expected to seek modifications in both bills, jeopardizing consensus and prospects of developing a final bill. 4. Mandates contained in S. 1961, such as rate setting requirements, consolidation reviews and asset management as preconditions to secure an SRF loan remain obstacles to secure a final Senate bill that can be acted on in the next three to four months. Southern California Coastal Research Project(SCCWRP)Award The Southern California Coastal Research Project (SCCWRP) was awarded the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) Region 9 Environmental Award. The Award presentation took place on June 6 in San Francisco. The recipients of this award demonstrated creativity,teamwork and leadership in addressing the west's most pressing and complex environmental problems. The EPA Region 9 Environmental Awards program acknowledges commitment and significant contributions to the environment in California, Arizona, Nevada, Hawaii, Guam, and tribal lands. SCCW RP's ability to facilitate collaboration among various agencies is outstanding. They have assisted USEPA, three Regional Water Quality Control Boards, State Water Resources Control Board, L.A. County Sanitation District, Orange County Sanitation District, City of San Diego, and other public agencies and local stakeholders in designing and implementing a more regionalized coastal monitoring program. Today, participants in the effort include Mexican scientists as well as citizen monitoring groups. SCCWRP was instrumental in getting the groups together to cooperatively monitor the southern California coastal area to be more cost- effective in answering some fundamental questions about the health of our coastal environment. In recent years, SCCWRP has expanded its efforts by having a more land-based or watershed level focus to help us address coastal problems that initiate from the land, such as urban and stormwater runoff carrying pollutants into coastal waters. SCCWRP has been involved in collecting water quality information on urban creeks, storm drains, and other conveyances that drain into our coastal waters. Their research helps us to understand the contribution of land sources to coastal pollution, and what management actions need to be taken to help reduce or eliminate such Members of the Board Page 10 June 19, 2002 sources. The organization continues to provide practical, technical assistance to public agencies to help us better manage coastal discharges and assess the impacts to the marine environment. OCSD is a charter member of SCCW RP dating back to the creation of SCCW RP in 1969. OCSD Is a member of SCCW RP's governing body along with representatives of Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, the San Diego, Los Angeles and Santa Ana Regional Water Oualiry Control Boards, California Environmental Protection Agency, and the State Water Resource Control Board. Use of the Term "Sole Source" Because of questions raised from time to time by members of the Board about our use of the term "sole source", I asked Gary Streed to clarify what we mean by sole source and what our practice has been in utilizing sole. In many cities, "sole source" means that there is only one provider of a good or service. That is also our general understanding. The reason we use the term "sole source" occasionally when there are obviously other suppliers can be traced to our Purchasing Resolution. As you probably recall, we have provisions or requirements for competitive bids or proposals for purchases over$1,000. These provisions are waived when there is only one potential provider, a "sole source" provider. The Purchasing Resolution also provides for these competitive requirements to be waived in certain other situations and allows the "sole source" provisions to be followed. These situations are the very ones that cause the confusion and concerns that some of you have expressed. What we are trying to do is to ask for authority to treat a purchase as if it were a sole source even though there could be multiple suppliers. This is only done under certain strict situations that are spelled out in the Purchasing Resolution. Our goal is be certain during the directors' deliberate process that you know we did not get competitive prices or proposals for the item or services. If we did not do this, you should assume that we followed the competitive process that you as Directors have outlined for us. While we are working on an update to our Purchasing Resolution, we will revise the wording in our agenda reports and recommended actions to make this distinction more clear. I believe we must continue to use the "sole source" wording, though, as that is the existing wording in the Purchasing Resolution. ' Members of the Board Page 11 June 19, 2002 I hope this has been helpful. At the very least you know that we are hearing you and not simply ignoring your comments. In the best case we have made you more comfortable with our practice. If you still have questions, please contact Gary Streed at 714 593-7550. Leap into the Fair—We're Makino a Bin Splash OC Fair 2002 The Orange County Fair theme is all about water and frogs! And that's right up our alley, especially since this year the district is partnering with the County of Orange's Watershed and Storm Water units to talk about urban runoff issues. Our booth theme is "Make a Splashl Curb Urban Runoff." We have great plans for educating the public about what urban runoff is and how they can help stop it. Did you know that even though it hasn't rained recently—100 million gallons of dry weather runoff flows on to Orange County Beaches every day? The Fair runs from July 12 -28. This is a great opportunity for board members to interact with the communities they serve. If this interests you, contact Lisa Murphy at 714 593-7120 for more details on how to volunteer at the booth. Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Blakerson General Manager BPA:jt G%WP.OTANOMIMGM,LETEPS TO THE SOMG,ry 602 HOMD LETTER DOC Attachments June 13,2002 Mr.Blake Anderson otuxoe cower wsrcx General Manager,Orange County Sanitation District 2 PoiR FMyu.see im 10844 Ellis Ave. �....C....nei< Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Pnon9'.9496619013 rox:94¢47e0513 E,nar.mna®eD,ah,®ocx.o,D Dear Mr. Anderson: Filthy. Toilet bowl. Off-limits. Like it or not,this is how beach conditions are dr"Mm commonly described along our Orange County coastline. As summer quickly S,e°a eons approaches,we must take action to protect our water quality and to restore the image PKmi"M of our beach communities. If we don't,we run the risk of replaying the disastrous An,n anwn summer of 1999 when five miles of our beaches were closed to swimming. In the EXECWIW D9eECTOR wake of these closures,beach-dependant businesses in Huntington Beach lost more monn than$30 million in revenue in the summers of 1999 and 2000,according to recent research conducted at USC and UC Berkeley. BOARD OF DIRECTORS sego"one Recent events,listed below,give Orange Coast Watch reason for concern this anon w°,aMm,Bwcn Ilawn summer: T ;,Ba . In February,Orange County Sanitation District General Manager Blake Mlnom/Mown Anderson stated that their plume of wastewater came"uncomfortably close" to the shoreline at Newport Beach—within a half-mile. c9,ne nIDU.Ph v—.o . A paper was published in an academic journal in March that showed how shoe,De.0 the plume could potentially move to within a half-mile of the shore and to °ulana=oPaa<9^. depths as shallow as 65 feet. n�h«aPn anPmcn d—.P • In April,Orange County closed a half-mile stretch of beach at Magnolia Stoney Gant Ph.o. un«, . cP.�IPmn.„�na Street to swimming due to high bacteria counts and uncertainty about their Derym WIN source. The closure remained in effect for one month. .tuna 0.r,.non • Results from a recent$5 million study conducted for the District failed to conclude that the plume of partially treated sewage does not reach the shore. Tnomm J.Me,, In the face of this information,the District has committed to disinfecting its �enommwn wastewater. After thorough analysis of the disinfection process and its potential effectiveness,Orange Coast Watch wholeheartedly supports this decision. The "sononai�e enclosed technical paper shows: o,onaca�nn R.Shun Otero P P msnoel score T,se, • The few relatively small sewage dischargers along the California coast who Din^..P Ab,n G—P do not treat to secondary standards disinfect their wastewater prior to ltoboo Toms, discharge; °yeh°"°—` • Treatment with sodium hypochlorite(bleach),with proper dosage and s' ',"„I; application time,can be an effective means of disinfecting wastewater;and c9Dw WRIIm(n M D. • Byproducts that are potentially harmful to the marine environment can be O'hoo "u°„«"' reduced by disinfection of more thoroughly treated wastewater(i.e. '1o1;° secondary vs.primary). Disinfection of its sewage will finally bring the District in line with the minimum efforts to reduce pathogens used by every other ocean sewage discharger in cieon,clan„,„eet.,, California. We urge the District and regulators to pursue an expedited permitting To,Como,county oeocee, process so that disinfection can commence as soon as possible. MIWon EIYnFw1Yq wu,casof l= Plop ktv..,.educMNM. Ilndvemeni and aaym The use of disinfection should not preclude the District from taking further steps to safeguard public health. As shown in our review,viral and bacterial destruction via sodium hypochlorite is more effective on wastewater that has been treated to secondary,not primary,standards. Orange County is one of only a handful of sanitation districts nationwide to be granted a waiver from secondary treatment standards in the federal Clean Water Act. This waiver allows them to dump sewage treated to only primary standards directly into the ocean. Continuing beach closures, which seem to have no cure,tell us that the days when we could use our ocean as a damping ground are over. Orange Coast Watch is the voice for Orange County business in raising the awareness of residents,policy makers and lawmakers about the value of clean water at our beaches. We would be happy to answer any questions you may have about the findings in the report. If you would prefer,we would be willing to present our findings to you in person. Sincerely, W G' Matt Hagemann Executive Director Enclosure Orange County Infrastructure Report Card - A WORK IN PROGRESS - Orange County needs to REBUILD, UPGRADE, REPLACE or EXPAND Public Infrastructure to maintain our economic vitality and high quality of life. INFRASTRUCTURE UCI Civil and Environmental Engineering Affiliates W. CONGRESS UCI Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering American Society of Civil Engineers California Rebuild America Coalition All working together to assess Orange County's Infrastructure Condition, Capacity, and Operations! °""n yTC 90 THE RESULT: 1 An Orange County Infrastructure Report Card (based on the ASCE National Report Card format) The 8 working committees and their chairpersons are: Transportation__ ......... Les Card (LSA) Hank Alonso (Caltrans) Matt Stone (OCMWD) Wastewater___.................._...___.............. Nick Arhontes (OCSD) Flood Control/Urban Runoff.................. Sonia Nasser (OCPFRD) Schools............_..._................._................................... Ronald Everley (JHTM) Solid Waste_._.__....._—_ Kevin Kondru (OCIWM) Aviation___.—_ Tom Miles (JHTM) Parks and Recreation --- Leslee Temple (NUVIS) These committees will develop detailed methodology, gather and analyze data, determine an initial grade. A review council made up of senior experts in their category, will then review and evaluate the methodology and findings of the committees, validate the reports and develop assessment statements for each grade. THE ANSWERM October 10, 2002 For further information, please contact Reky Hiramoto (949) 472-3505 Orange County Infrastructure Report Card Rm ppn.r ,CarrD Rtletla o.ltl � RESU « LABLE OC „ ° .0 2002 °IAable l✓oloiya�b'ney, M r fib!?+nnarlN` INFRASTRUCTURE CONGRESS ' Infrastructure Congress Conference Beckman Center /►; University of California, Irvine N N- Mark this IMPORTANT DATEH For further information, please contact Reky Hiramoto (949) 472-3505 SignOnSanDiego.com News StateiThe West--Five-year plan to improve California will c... Page 1 of 2 �j1yQA L:T'PSdL Sign0nftmNc f>c.com CbPRINTTHIS Five-year plan to improve California will cost $56 billion ASSOCIATED PRESS June 13,2002 SACRAMENTO—During the next five years,$56 billion needs to be spent by the state on transportation, school construction and other public works projects,according to a plan released by the Davis administration. The five-year infrastructure plan,released Wednesday,is the states first attempt to identify the need for new or improved public facilities and the sources of money to pay for them.The plan is required by a law passed three years ago. "Since the i96os,"the report says,"decades of under investment in infrastructure have left the state with large deficits in capacity and deferred maintenance." The$56 billion in recommended spending is 61 percent more than the amount spent by the state on infrastructure during the past io years. The plan was supposed to be issued by the Department of Finance in January.But the department said the plan needed revision because of a budget shortfall that has reached a record$23.6 billion. Under the plan, $1.6 billion would be spent during the next five years from the state general fund,beginning with$44 million next year. The general fund pays for most state programs and is expected to total more than$78 billion next year.Most of the infrastructure funding, $21.1 billion,would come from the state's share of$4o billion in future bonds paid off by the general fund over decades. Nearly half of the bond money would be spent after the five-year period or used for non-state projects such as housing and local parks. Transportation projects wadd receive $27.7 billion,kindergarten through high school would get$14.9 billion,higher education would receive$5.4 billion,water projects$2.4 billion,natural resources and environmental protection $1.5 billion,and public safety would receive$1.1 billion. The Department of Finance said the plan will be improved in the future as many state departments learn how to focus on their long-term needs and will be updated each January.Some do not have a complete inventory of their facilities. Authorized by a law written by former Assembly Speaker Robert Hertzberg,D-Van Nuys,the plan reflects a 1998 California Business Roundtable report that also called for more infrastructure spending. http://signonsandiego.pri n i th is.cl ickability.com/pttprintThis?clickMap=printThis&fb=Y&u:... 6/14/2002 SignOnSanDiego.conr News Statefrhe West—Five-year plan to improve California will c... Page 2 of 2 William Hauck,the Business Roundtable president told The San Diego Union-Tribune that fulfilling the plan ' would benefit the state. Skeptics,however,include Sen.Steve Peace,D-El Cajon,who carried similar infrastructure legislation to years ago. "Any five-year plan they produce,from one angle or the other,will be blown up within a few years,"Peace said."And they will say,'We have to start all over again.'It's kind of the nature of this business that as soon as you publish a proposal,you are vulnerable." Find this article at: hapzfh t .union-bib.mMnewsrstate/20020513-1aa4t .pubbcxalaplan.hbnl r Check the box to include the list of rinks referenced in the article. htq)d/signonsandiego.pri nt ihis.cl ick abi lity.com/pt/printThis?clickMap=printThis&fb=Y&tc... 6/14/2002 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Members of the Board Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: June 7, 2002 RE: Howard Jarvis Tax Pavers Association v. City of Salinas On June 3, 2002 the Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District issued its ruling and decision on a taxpayer's suit challenging a storm drainage fee adopted by the City of Salinas. The challenge was based upon an alleged violation of California Constitution Article XIIID (Proposition 218). 1 report this case to you directly because of questions, similar to that raised in the case, that have been presented to your Board during the past year on the subject of urban runoff. The City of Salinas elected to adopt by ordinance, without a vote of the people, a fee on users of its storm water drainage system. The amount of the fee was calculated according to the degree to which the property contributed runoff to the City's drainage facilities. The Plaintiffs challenged this ordinance on the basis that it was a "property related fee" as defined under Proposition 218, and thus was required to have an approving vote of the Electorate. During the past year OCSD has participated in a number of storm water and urban runoff projects in conjunction with the County of Orange, the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Newport Beach, and in doing so has simply absorbed the cost of doing so from its general budget. Those projects with the other entities have been memorialized by agreement which does provide that at a certain point in time when the total storm water flow exceeds 4 million gallons, then fees will be charged to all of the contract participating agencies. What has been presented for discussion and issue without prior resolution is whether the District, if it engages in significant urban runoff programs of its own, would have the ability to offset those costs by simply increasing its annual sewer service charge or its capital facilities capacity charge. I have previously provided an informal discussion and opinion to your Board of Directors indicating that the case was proceeding through the Appellate Courts as a result of a challenge to the City of Salinas ordinance and while the City prevailed at the Trial Court, I offered the opinion that I was not very optimistic that the ruling would be upheld on appeal. \153140\1 June 7, 2002 Page 2 The Appellate Court, now having found that such storm drainage fees are in violation of Article XIIID, would place the OCSD at substantial risk if it attempted to enact a comparable fee without a vote of the Electorate. While the opinion does come from a different District than the Appellate District serving Orange County, it is deemed as precedent law. It is my opinion that at this time, the District could not validly enact by ordinance, a fee to pay or the cos o urban runoffmanagement, either as a separate Tee or an incremental increase to me Ljismci s existing sewerage fees. The Court of Appeal specifically held that storm drainage fees are not "sewer fees." If the case is appealed to the Supreme Court and it is accepted for consideration and decision, the District could simply await the final outcome. If it is not appealed, then the Salinas case will be deemed to be controlling law and the District would need to consider having any such fees submitted to the voters of the entire District for approval. I would also note that the District sponsored bill, authored by Assemblyman Tom Harman (AB 1892) simply authorizes OCSD to engage in urban runoff/drainage programs. It does not attempt to equate any drainage fees that may be considered, with "sewer fees." Thus, the bill does not provide any relief from the ruling in the Salinas case. YI�r/ THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:jlo cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson EMT \15314OXI Filed 6/3/02 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION et. al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, H022665 (Monterey County V. Super. Ct. No. M45873) CITY OF SALINAS et.al, Defendants and Respondents. In this "reverse validation" action, plaintiff taxpayers challenged a storm drainage fee imposed by the City of Salinas. Plaintiffs contended that the fee was a "property- related" fee requiring voter approval, pursuant to California Constitution, article XIIID, section 6(c), which was added by the passage of Proposition 218. The trial court ruled that the fee did not violate this provision because(1) it was not a property-related fee and (2) it met the exemption for fees for sewer and water services. We disagree with the trial court's conclusion and therefore reverse the order. Background In an effort to comply with the 1987 amendments to the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251, et. seq.,40 C.F.R. § 122.26(a),et. seq.), the Salinas City Council took measures to reduce or eliminate pollutants contained in storm water, which was channeled in a drainage system separate from the sanitary and industrial waste systems. On June 1, 1999, the City Council enacted two ordinances to fund and maintain the compliance program. These measures, ordinance Nos. 2350 and 2351, added Chapters 29 and 29A,respectively, to the Salinas City Code. Section 29h3 allowed the City Council to adopt a resolution imposing a "Storm Water Management Utility fee" to finance the improvement of storm and surface water management facilities. The fee would be imposed on "users of the storm water drainage system." On July 20, 1999,the City Council adopted Resolution No. 17019, which established rates for the storm and surface water management system. The resolution specifically states: "There is hereby imposed on each and every developed parcel of land within the City, and the owners and occupiers thereof,jointly and severally, a storm drainage fee." The fee was to be paid annually to the City "by the owner or occupier of each and every developed parcel in the City who shall be presumed to be the primary utility rate payer. . . ." The amount of the fee was to be calculated according to the degree to which the property contributed runoff to the City's drainage facilities. That contribution, in rum, would be measured by the amount of"impervious area"I on that parcel. Undeveloped parcels -- those that had not been altered from their natural state -- were not subject to the storm drainage fee. In addition, developed parcels that maintained their own storm water management facilities or only partially contributed storm or surface water to the City's storm drainage facilities were required to pay in proportion to the amount they did contribute runoff or used the City's treatment services. I "Impervious Area," according to Resolution No. 17019, is "any part of any developed parcel of land that has been modified by the action of persons to reduce the land's natural ability to absorb and hold rainfall. This includes any hard surface area which either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as it entered under natural conditions pre-existent to development, and/or a hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions pre-existent to development." 2 On September 15, 1999, plaintiffs filed a complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 863 to determine the validity of the fee.2 Plaintiffs alleged that this was a property-related fee that violated article XIIID, section 6, subdivision(c), of the California Constitution because it had not been approved by a majority vote of the affected property owners or a two-thirds vote of the residents in the affected area. The trial court,however, found this provision to be inapplicable on two grounds: (1)the fee was not "property related" and (2) it was exempt from the voter-approval requirement because it was "related to" sewer and water services. Discussion Article XIIID was added to the California Constitution in the November 1996 election with the passage of Proposition 218,the "Right to Vote On Taxes Act." Section 6 of article XIIID3 requires notice of a proposed property-related fee or charge and a public hearing. If a majority of the affected owners submit written protests,the fee may not be imposed. (§ 6, subd. (a)(2).) The provision at issue is section 6, subdivision(c) (hereafter "section 6(c)"), which states, in relevant part: 'Except for fees or charges for sewer, water, and refuse collection services, no property related fee or charge shall be imposed or increased unless and until that fee or charge is submitted and approved by a majority vote of the property owners of the property subject to the fee or charge or, at the option of the agency,by a two-thirds vote of the electorate residing in the affected area." Section 2 defines a "fee" under this article as a levy imposed "upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership, including a user fee or charge for a property related service." (§ 2, subd. (e).) A "property-related service" is "a public 2 Plaintiffs are the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association,the Monterey Peninsula Taxpayers Association, and two resident property owners. 3 All further unspecified section references are to article XIIID of the California Constitution. 3 service having a direct relationship to property ownership." (§2, subd. (h).) The City maintains that the storm drainage fee is not a property-related fee, but a "user fee" which the property owner can avoid simply by maintaining a storm water management facility on the property. Because it is possible to own property without being subject to the fee, the City argues this is not a fee imposed "as an incident of property ownership" or "for a property related service"within the meaning of section 2. We cannot agree with the City's position. Resolution No. 17019 plainly established a property-related fee for a property-related service,the management of storm water runoff from the "impervious" areas of each parcel in the City. The resolution expressly stated that "each owner and occupier of a developed lot or parcel of real property within the City, [sic] is served by the City's storm drainage facilities" and burdens the system to a greater extent than if the property were undeveloped. Those owners and occupiers of developed property "should therefore pay for the improvement, operation and maintenance of such facilities." Accordingly,the resolution makes the fee applicable to "each and every developed parcel of land within the City." This is not a charge directly based on or measured by use, comparable to the metered use of water or the operation of a business, as the City suggests. (See Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles(2001)24 CalAth 830, 838 [article XIID inapplicable to inspection fee imposed on private landlords;Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of Los Angeles (2000) 85 Cal.AppAth 79, [water usage rates are not within the scope of article XBID].) The "Proportional Reduction" clause on which the City relies does not alter the nature of the fee as property related.4 A property owner's operation of a private storm drain system reduces the amount owed to the City to the extent that runoff into the City's 4 According to the Public Works Director,proportional reductions were not anticipated to apply to a large number of people. 4 system is reduced. The fee nonetheless is a fee for a public service having a direct relationship to the ownership of developed property. The City's characterization of the proportional reduction as a simple "opt-out" arrangement is misleading, as it suggests the property owner can avoid the fee altogether by declining the service. Furthermore,the reduction is not proportional to the amount of services requested or used by the occupant, but on the physical properties of the parcel. Thus, a parcel with a large "impervious area" (driveway, patio, roof)would be charged more than one consisting of mostly rain- absorbing soil. Single-family residences are assumed to contain, on average, a certain amount of impervious area and are charged$18.66 based on that assumption. Proposition 218 specifically stated that "[t]he provisions of this act shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purposes of limiting local government revenue and enhancing taxpayer consent." (Proposition 218, § 5.) We are obligated to construe constitutional amendments in accordance with the natural and ordinary meaning of the language used by the framers—in this case,the voters of California—in a manner that effectuates their purpose in adopting the law. (Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1978)22 Cal.3d 208,244-245;Arden Carmichael, Inc. v. County of Sacramento (2000)93 Cal.AppAth 507, 514-515;Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan (1980) 27 Cal.3d 855, 863.) To interpret the storm drainage fee as a use-based charge would contravene one of the stated objectives of the Proposition 218 by "frustrat[ing] the purposes of voter approval for tax increases." (Proposition 218, § 2.) We must conclude, therefore,that the storm drainage fee "burden[s] landowners as landowners," and is therefore subject to the voter-approval requirements of article XIIID unless an exception applies. (Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 24 Cal.4th at p. 842.) 2. Exception for "Sewer"or "Water"Service As an alternative ground for its decision,the trial court found that the storm drainage fee was "clearly a fee related to 'sewer' and'water' services." The exception in 5 section 6(c) applies to fees "for sewer, water, and refuse collection services." Thus, the question we must next address is whether the storm drainage fee was a chargejor sewer service or water service. The parties diverge in their views as to whether the reach of section 6(c)extends to a storm drainage system as well as a sanitary or industrial waste sewer system. The City urges that we rely on the "commonly accepted" meaning of"sewer," noting the broad dictionary definition of this word.5 The City also points to Public Utilities Code section 230.5 and the Salinas City Code, which describe storm drains as a type of sewer.6 Plaintiffs "do not disagree that storm water is carried off in storm sewers," but they argue that we must look beyond mere definitions of"sewer" to examine the legal meaning in context. Plaintiffs note that the storm water management system here is distinct from the sanitary sewer system and the industrial waste management system. Plaintiffs' position echoes that of the Attorney General, who observed that several California statutes differentiate between management of storm drainage and sewerage 5 Webster's Third New International Dictionary, for example, defines "sewer" as "l: a ditch or surface drain; 2: an artificial usu. subterranean conduit to carry off water and waste matter(as surface water from rainfall, household waste from sinks or baths, or wastewater from industrial works)." (Webster's 3d New Internal. Dict. (1993)p. 2081.) The American Heritage Dictionary also denotes the function of"carrying off sewage or rainwater." (American Heritage College Dict. (3d ed. 1997)p. 1248.) On the other hand, the Random House Dictionary of the English Language (2d ed. 1987) page 1754, does not mention storm or rain water in defining "sewer" as "an artificial conduit,usually underground, for carrying off waste water and refuse, as in a town or city." 6 Public Utilities Code section 230.5 defines "Sewer system" to encompass all property connected with "sewage collection, treatment, or disposition for sanitary or drainage purposes, including . . . all drains,conduits, and outlets for surface or storm waters, and any and all other works, property or structures necessary or convenient for the collection or disposal of sewage, industrial waste, or surface or storm waters." Salinas City Code section 36-2(31) defines "storm drain" as "a sewer which carries storm and surface waters and drainage, but which excludes sewage and industrial wastes other than runoff water." 6 systems.7(81 Ops. Cal.Atty Gen, 104, 106(1998).) Relying extensively on the Attorney General's opinion,plaintiffs urge application of a different rule of construction than the plain-meaning rule; they invoke the maxim that"if a statute on a particular subject omits a particular provision, inclusion of that provision in another related statute indicates an intent [that] the provision is not applicable to the statute from which it was omitted." (In re Marquis D. (1995) 38 Cal.AppAth 1813, 1827.) Thus,while section 5, which addresses assessment procedures,refers to exceptions specifically for'�ewers, water, flood control, [and]drainage systems,"the exceptions listed in section 6(c)pertain only to "sewer, water, and refuse collection services." Consequently, in plaintiffs' view, the voters must have intended to exclude drainage systems from the list of exceptions to the voter-approval requirement. The statutory construction principles invoked by both parties do not assist us. The maxim proffered by plaintiffs, "although useful at times, is no more than a rule of reasonable inference" and cannot control over the lawmakers'intent. (California Fed. Savings &Loan Assn. v. City of Los Angeles(1995) 11 CalAth 342, 350;Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. (1998) 17 CalAth 985,991.) On the other hand, invoking the plain-meaning rule only begs the question of whether the term "sewer services" was intended to encompass the more specific sewerage with which most voters would be expected to be familiar,or all types of systems that use sewers, including storm drainage 7 For example, Government Code section 63010 specifies "storm sewers" in delimiting the scope of"drainage,"while separately identifying the facilities and equipment used for"[s]ewage collection and treatment." (Gov. Code, § 63010, subds. (q)(3), (q)(10).) Government Code section 53750,part of the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act,explains that for purposes of articles XIIIC and article XIIID "[d]rainage system" means "any system of public improvements that is intended to provide for erosion control, landslide abatement, or for[sic] other types of water drainage." Health and Safety Code section 5471 sets forth government power to collect fees for"services and facilities. . . in connection with its water, sanitation,storm drainage, or sewerage system." 7 and industrial waste. The popular, nontechnical sense of sewer service, particularly when placed next to "water" and "refuse collection" services,suggests the service familiar to most households and businesses, the sanitary sewerage system. We conclude that the term "sewer services" is ambiguous in the context of both section 6(c) and Proposition 218 as a whole. We must keep in mind, however, the voters' intent that the constitutional provision be construed liberally to curb the rise in "excessive" taxes, assessments, and fees exacted by local governments without taxpayer consent. (Proposition 218, §§ 2, 5.) Accordingly, we are compelled to resort to the principle that exceptions to a general rule of an enactment must be strictly construed, thereby giving "sewer services" its narrower,more common meaning applicable to sanitary sewerage.8 (Cf.Estate ofBanerjee(1978)21 Cal.3d 527, 540; City of Lafayette v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist. (1993) 16 Cal.AppAth 1005.) The City itself treats storm drainage differently from its other sewer systems. The stated purpose of Ordinance No.2350 was to comply with federal law by reducing the amount of pollutants discharged into the storm water, and by preventing the discharge of "non-storm water" into the storm drainage system, which channels storm water into state waterways. According to John Fair,the Public Works Director,the City's storm drainage fee was to be used not just to provide drainage service to property owners, but to monitor and control pollutants that might enter the storm water before it is discharged into natural bodies of water 9 The Salinas City Code contains requirements addressed specifically to 8 Sanitary sewerage carries "putrescible waste" from residences and businesses and discharges it into the sanitary sewer line for treatment by the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency. (Salinas City Code, § 36-2,subd. (26).) 9 Resolution No. 17019 defined "Storm Drainage Facilities" as "the storm and surface water sewer drainage systems comprised[sic]of storm water control facilities and any other natural features [that] store,control,treat and/or convey surface and storm water. The Storm Drainage Facilities shall include all natural and man-made elements used to convey storm water from the first point of impact with the surface of the earth to a suitable receiving body of water or location internal or external to the boundaries of the 8 the management of storm water runoff l0 (See,e.g., Salinas City Code, §§ 31-802.2, 29-15.) For similar reasons we cannot subscribe to the City's suggestion that the storm drainage fee is "for. . . water services." Government Code section 53750,enacted to explain some of the terms used in articles XIIIC and XIIID, defines "[w]ater" as "any system of public improvements intended to provide for the production, storage, supply, treatment, or distribution of water." The average voter would envision "water service" as the supply of water for personal,household, and commercial use, not a system or program that monitors storm water for pollutants,carries it away, and discharges it into the nearby creeks,river, and ocean. We conclude that article XIIID required the City to subject the proposed storm drainage fee to a vote by the property owners or the voting residents of the affected area. The trial court therefore erred in ruling that Ordinance Nos. 2350 and 2351 and Resolution No. 17019 were valid exercises of authority by the City Council. Disposition The judgment is reversed. Costs on appeal are awarded to plaintiffs. Elia, J. WE CONCUR: Premo,Acting P.J. Mihara,J. City. . . ." The "storm drainage system" was defined to include pipes, culverts, streets and gutters, "storm water sewers," ditches, streams, and ponds. (See also Salinas City Code, § 29-3, solid. (i) [defining "storm drainage system"].) 10 Storm water under Ordinance No. 2350 includes "storm water runoff, snowmelt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage." (Salinas City Code, § 29-3, subd. (dd).) 9 Trial Court: Monterey County Superior Court Trial Judge: Hon. Richard M. Silver Attorneys for Appellants: Timothy J. Morgan and Jonathan M. Coupal and Timothy A.. Bittle Attorneys for Respondents: James C. Sanchez, City Attorney of Salinas, and Richards, Watson & Gershon, Mitchell E. Abbott and Patrick K. Bobko Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn., et al. v. City ojSalinas, et al. H022665 10 IM4Fab Mar a oamra n . , �© moo mamvoramtrm �. mama ©r �. �. �. ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ May 28,2002 Surfrider Foundation Mr.Blake Anderson Assistant General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10944 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 - Dear Mr.Anderson, - In the late 1930s,before the popular environmental movement came to be,John Steinbeck and his biologist friend Ed Ricketts chartered a trawler in California and took a trip into the then pristine Gulf of California to catalogue marine specimens.The six-week cruise seemed to open the great writer to a notion of something larger.In the Sea of Cortez he wrote,"Species are only commas in a sentence...One species merges in another,groups melt into ecological groups until the time when what we know as life meets and enters what we think of as non-life:barnacle and rock rock and earth, earth and tree,tree and rain and air ... most of the feeling we call religious,most of the mystical - outcrying which is one of the most prized and used and desired reactions of our species,is really the understanding and the attempt to say that man is related to the whole thing."Steinbeck may well have been the first modem environmental observer to put that important notion in writing. That idea is why I recommend you read the State of the Beach report.Sweeping change is happening right now at your favorite beach.Often invisible to your eye,your little slice of paradise is changing, one wave at a time.As human ocean denizens,beach enthusiasts and surfers,know almost innately of our intertwined relationship with ocean life and non-living coastal processes.But coast and ocean viewed only as the tiny piece of real estate that is our home beach,can create a false impression.We - want you to see your beach in the context of the"whole thing." It's hard to look at the larger whole because the news isn't very good.For example,State of the Beach 2002 reveals that states like Oregon do not have a recreational ocean water quality-monitoring program.California has experienced a 500 percent increase in beach-destroying seawalls,and 950 miles of the 1100-m0e coastline is actively eroding.Many Texas beaches we eroding at a rate of 5 to 10 feet per year-one of the highest coastal erosion rates in the country.Experts contend that 600 additional feet may disappear in the next 25 years!Fewer than half of the homes for Puerto Rica's 4 million residents have sewage or septic systems installed and for a variety of reasons,water quality nationally is still poor. But the news isn't all gloomy.There are a few bright spots and this year in The Bad and the Rod we list a few standouts,but it's all connected.So I sincerely hope that when you go to your local beach You can think about its current health in a larger context And know that as Steinbeck said,"Man is related to the whole thing." Sincerely, - Christopher J.Evans,Esq. . Executive Director. NATIONAL OFFICE • P.O.BOX 6010 • SAN CLEMENTE,CA 92674.6010 (949)492-8170 • FAX(949)49241142 • w .surlrider.wg • E-MAIL info®surtrider.org ' amandrrma"e- JIBE-12-2002 VED 01117 PM r"" "�' gpq.ILD GJs cr rwc :Recycled°water' .-, to .make price more palatable;, rywm tl d lu mrllmriniWd in. aawr0111m,umOrb iM l lgfmwuhmhLrg �r I •enidrleuultd Uum00yav1utth%i it •. ` ' rriirr enllN Uutinennnldmm.11util§mom ', .E, • .. ' T ' • dminummM mu mrerydudmxlxrUmmdxyflm'`'t'" . IAIcblq t,rmulrvxb PuLDeienrhw,ullemjd id eyruw`' .rlt Mwdly;Ihn mnrrydllxeVd xwrtlleeJedexwrQ,u I dm:pilalllo tnUmrnnP^InbWoremhonbuwgl,_, � � �.S n 0,J* lemmd{nnnwnrtmAn.j. PrUmmntmry,rrnyekrlwNm egr,lbmfe ndw } r d 1mwbllWdluu.OlOnt in haxfuxHr ' µumularly impubnt mSmrtbrcvf'ulUxbu,whem' guyl.nn incrmwilrgly imlly rmmmiLY.. .. . ....: y rW. layrlal rYAluielnwlYla LxLrgu1 U,Umh O,r Iltighl(mi pn'{mvM.Nmv the fnlmninila eUfU�itiw ;AgurmywnnLx,Iv IAM Umwntcrfrmnifx wadewakff' •. t '92 r, 'JrW mmwPlnula xnd um itlOindlmga Um pdvx. '•:.,, r ' .y�! ? rf]nxuxlwuud 1ltlNn. y:- 1` :. Y"rllmegmlav4ld Wginnnt. . i A4wyCJrrllFtif¢ri{ yamwifhfu0mxxfa1120 5 ;y ;;{�'. : '+Tr -' I,,y 10.ym.lneinnenruirawilin•: I t)1111¢Sr�C IIIIIf l0yenn. . tort Ga:nrJef/Adr1, mbriatol'imuixm I 'i is Ibntn"CO M.O.nlfMm : I , SIr r '•i' b fl$)plUNL� Um8nn(btniel IDLxrmbbrlW. IrrlIN11Lr1'dfIFMS; Um Grinx Vnlby.6otlw MrhepLuhmryur mx wlu... RIM '...\�r..;.'• Mybxuaeeae(ul wxbr' , r me nuumgemkla wiUmvxlla .. j Aim wnhT,Fnlrbbwill lmnbbb uw Um myded wxlrriC.xlmldbfP^YlnR nn nmremflllY welMmliplNe. •I.Tj ' frmll mYlltYIOnlPnln ihO rIIPI,iCI, ., . S�J , �` -jell•$ (he;hngrrnwillWhnppy nlmldthxl nrrdc,m •r '{ C'1 ulyuainlvllmau0whxeninnim"ci x t wclakly' grmllmhrm,mRrrxfUm Cn®rnm1F�l CMnrty Wehm' IIixLIirL`Wrmw UcebW,e Muexxf Pnlnbk welef. 8� e.`V . .�. n o ' {pdlinp,Linlur mrd Li6ficr.iCejvxlnxtlnvbkap . • . 'i,{;{+.. "' �l�S�. ' IrlMinglLx rwb mrbmebmcm;fixmid 7:: .TI1u.vnsrxwnbrm PmOm'IYLmlal Wfnm WMg z; LItIn ,'. ' (:oD4M1ir11dtrrRhly.11!gn�EkYllly Wnl faiClrrinwl YlllC yfiS•rt .l..�PI 11. nFmrim,Lrcludrng llm(nLfanMnxpnrhmdof.. L��S' � } a t. IllAllh 9rf OLMAdA. ..lOJnl drm•U,.,Ay•. l (bnh,dllly. wldUl lmuu iin%i Won LLeldnn. Nulnmlly;rugtlml wnlnrimtmennt brLmnnn IIIP diiigl and.,..,n,kOpI aumielY xllxlrpowe '91 L • iwt JinyjmRntim,u[imi0.,Playl,•mrnxk mul � � rv,fl +�,5 E + InmMm,nngg,,wxbrbrfmlrmryR+nd,WrinlamLnRL �' '"' `t�;!!_,4r y A nuxhingbllidannU urinals drmmlim fuwdninn;':; . ^'i7q;x eli` inrrifneninl lArmdfLw�fwCrgh4^R owl lhemer. r • j Ill,i%Vilrn{iifjNlgl nl RmtllMlMelemlirRliM. •, i 'Ilm Cldnu Pxxin iP n,mu{IlmbmmLintix.Nnln :.. • Cnlifnmin,inUmnbpl b 1nIJ Abor n n mlilnn nuc fret And I1M iGI7A el ggdim'flxryer mrpb!to nW ul9 W,000: P(x,YlG lrinpnM{5 ' ' lle emlhunlalMvrt 90yfOD emtilept lfmyehrl WxL!r marl+ivluinrd,MUtnroU,xrdC;OIXlnyrmY .0 .fI •.pfnv.-LanreOid MAultin I'M 0 0 melmrimngi uxfid.u7ut$1 0 dm0,id01l0n�mid„ ' . imPnrbdwabr.'IWuevnrugu 6mrined We'l; aknwdn,aro-fiwL,dwxierprvmllm i s ' 1 imP"rinrxnnfllm�mr�n�In UmW I.l6wxmlWikyre fuluk: � Il P:tL'^uulnl mmrdrmyiiMwolerielheridll Utuglb rb tnUL Rrc t!m lnlxlxl6 Vel l�+e emnnmy and. . . , Mwllidml9,l �• 1 Honolulu still relies on primary treat- Wastewater Treatment ment. which essentially screens out sludge. Controversially, so do some oth- er coasml regions, such as San Diego, HONOLULU SEES THE LIGHT IN UPGRADE rm;discharges efluent through gh a primary" OF PRIMARY PLANT WITH FEDERAL WAIVER ""ed0���'upus$2tiilIo�oreo hooted treatment,the California Coastal AT FAMED WAIKIKI BEACH,NOTHING IN tiom and 36 of the 16,000 public sewer Commission refused to support San the way of signage alerts tourists,swim- agencies in the U.S.,Honolulu provides Diego's request for another five-year men and surfers that Honolulu dis- less than secondary wastewater meat- waiver under the federal Clean Water charges its effluent into the ocean. But ment—meaning without any addition of Act (ENR 4/22 p. 13). behind the scenes,local officials acknowf bacteria to digest organic wastes.Instead, The situation remains less contentious edge the concerns of envi- in Honolulu.But modhated ronmentalists and federal of- t - party by a legal settlement ficials about the Fluctuating with the Sierra Club, Hon- quality of effluent spewing olulu plans to install the from the Hawaiian capital's world's first ultraviolet-light nearly twomile-long ocean disinfection system in a less- outfaB. than-secondary,system. But things are about to 9 don't know of any UV change.local officials prom- that is installed in primary, ise improvements by early even advanced primary,"says 2004 from a nearly$Y00.re- Richard Pearcey,a sales man- lion locally funded public ager for the project's equip- works project, which trey ment manufacturer, Trojan describe as the largest city Technologies Inc.,London. and county project ever on Canada, which claims 70% the island of Oahu of the world market for UV I ke many developing no. THAT Addition of ultravWet system on primary plant may be a first disinfection systems.Pearoey says Honolulu's new system is the fast of YrWr "^-c, the engmcerof the new headworksfzdl- many that Trojan officials hope,to'seli CtNla try,redden[engineer Manny Masada, around the Pacific,particularly in Bevel-h declines m comment on the divi- oping nations where minimal meat- sion of labor. ment keeps high levels ofssupend- ®W Honke's agency oversees edsolichm the eBlucnt The system _ Oahu's eight public wastewater 6mctions well undo such condi- treatment plants,just two of now, penetrating missoorgan- which provide less than sec- isms cell walls even with as little ondary treatment. The two in- as 15% t ammmon of UV rays elude the one at Sand Island. through the suspended solids, .-<.�.. ,;< ! Built in 1979, it treats 70% of Peareey says s I Oahu's sewagg including all of Honolulu officials admit that �,t- metropolitan Honolulu. Leaks they new considered using one pro- ® IYaehMa and infiltration of brackish water gram manager for such an innovative in low-lying areas make Sand WoeOa h(Yant su+asaY a9 MOh,ii and large treatment upgrade. Instead, WW Island's effluent coo saline to theyclMded theprojectinm three parts ss0° reclaim costeffectively with ter- m spread the work around, and never - -dory trwornent Partly to reduce expected the same contractor,RCI Con- such leaks, the county plans to strucuon Group,Summer,Wash.,to win as`Ifsem spend $1.7 billion during the all three.It reports to three design and tsvb _ nest 20 years on sewerage construction management ventures. L upgrades, such as new "I don't know if consolidating the -';� mains. designs would have saved anything,"says Honolulu plans to keep James R Honke, wastewater division the Sand Island plantatart chief in the Dept of Design and Con- \`� advanced primary level, swoon in the Cityand Countyof Hon. currentlyachievedbyin- olulu.'Mae might haw been some sa- y�nyet , jetting air that causes ings on the CM,but I can't quantify it' .s.gmua lighter particles to Boat for In the local office of B,M.Towill Corp., easier skimming. But the the CM for the new UV facility as well as UPGRADE Prolect,worth$200 mllllon,should Mlsh In 2004. city now plans to alter that 22 ENR/MAY 20, 2002 system, which fails sometimes m meet fed- C21limits on bfochem- ical oxygen demand. Still, the plant contin- ues to meet enough ch- teria to merit one of just 36 federal waken MASON permitting less than- secondary treatment, says janetY.Hashimoto,monitoring and assessment chief in the U.S. Environ- mental Protecdon Agency's water divi- sion office in San Francisco. Honolulu plans to add a pretreatment headworks and a UV disinfection facility to the Sand Island plant to enhance reli- ability, kill 99% of so-called indicator orgarria+w•and even increase the average daily ,,;and capacity from 74 mil- lion gal per day to 90 mgd. The plans WrIhw11�s1s11M }9 ,Sand IMtmOIAmRtnata bw-yfng areas. also call for an upgrade of a pump sta- don on Oahu.All three projects ended up last year with RCI's local office,which bid$172 million in all,for a total of$22 million less than next lowest bidden. Honolulu olSciah expected the head- work's construction alone m cost$150 million instead of RCI's fill-million bid. The higher estimate reflected concerns about"canting where reguiadoms pro hibit ocean dumping of milky coralline groundwater. To minimize costly dewa- tering,RCf put in 39 million ofjet grout- ing around the headworks and UV facil- ity sites. "This is the largest single jet grouting project ever in Hawaii," says Tim Tucker,an RCI project manager. This project has some of the most diverse foundation systems to he found in one job,"adds Ralph P Macon,RCCs vice chairman.But even with three pro} ect teams to report to,RCl saves the pub- lic's money by sharing temporary sheet ppiles and four cranes and by writing off SI million of proprietary concrete forms across the three jobs."By luck"for loci officials, RCI obtained all three con- tracts, Mason says. 'S think they're tick. led.1 don't think They saw that coming at all." But he adds, 9t would have been nice to have had one engineer and con- strncuon manager." ❑ 1 t David B.RasmEaum in Honolulu 26 ENR/MAY 20. 2002 Volume FNewslette A June as American Public Works Association, South Bay Area Monthly Luncheon& The Case for a California Meeting Details: ' Data WWmaaaYN.19,2dp2„ Infrastructure Fund 12,Wpm. tvmoa: Miclnara„A«e..M By Sarah Layton, Executive Vice tamv..a Resident, California Rebuild America Prwam: scvwwa Chwe„a.a: Coalition rxaaalu w— RW: is MklwlMu¢a.Sa„n The California Rebuild America Car.Ca„Iy.laDaI STI 24U a r.Pal«eay.ameil Coalition (CalRAC) set as a major himn at apwarspv priority this year the establishment '°°'C0Y1eiS p"a� of a fund that dedicates a portion of IMP try ntls,A.re 14. M2. the general fund to infrastructure. wnanmakagreaa«„ms CaIRAC members believe that dedicated and consistent funding, cb'dmeedebdm,e.lwnoR Ba oab«Ee«sd°"nm° such as that P B provided through estab- aa„ar«rauml. Nl weaa s2pwranla„�'� lishment of an infrastructure fund, is a key to decreasing the year-to- year funding uncertainties that im- Submittal Requirements pede the long-term planning and Assembly Member Keith Richman for the Next Newsletter: implementation of California infra- states, "California has lost its com- Deadnae:Morxlay,. 24.2002 structure construction, maintenance mitment to funding the infrastructure F«m°r Emal d«om Me baK and rehabilitation. needed to maintain our high quality ce,Wd In MS Wmd c«npetlble of life and prepare for another 15 mil- l«mac lob opaNagaam In the 1960s, some 20 percent of 1« P lion people by 2020... Only a re- 2~,NrayaphaW0M the general fund was directed to newed commitment to invest in Cali- gapn'rspoaammpw"«"ro. infrastructure. Today, infrastruc- fomia's public works will keep our Articlaasnanmoae page maz'a,wneiNgapniu r. tore funding through the general obligation to future generations:' Reptee. fund is at about 3 percent. At the Contavx:Trxk SakekNara may tg same time, the demands placed on Establishment of an infrastructure �aa«+ad by w,ulany wat existing infrastructure to service a fund that supplements existing infra- WHIN har at(aoe)ssz growing population have skyrock- structure funding sources would sig- 7".. eted. Our vital infrastructure sys- nal a much-needed renewed commit- tems are overloaded and unprepared ment by California leaders to invest Inside this issue: for the future. The results are all in these public assets that are so criti- around us: crumbling schools and cal to our quality of life and eco- • FeatureArW.-CeIRAC overcrowded universities; con- nomic vitality. It would be one • Job Opetur Ea.nts ested roads; inadequate water and B B • Jabopartlys B 9 means to begin the Ion but critical • rear2DUChaptersuppartar sewage treatment; neglected parks task of rebuilding and solidifying our • chapter txfi &Past Pras and dwindling open ace. d,„ta B P P foundation for the future. continued on page 2... Page 2 APWA � SOUTH BAY AREA CHAPTER O—Lonof Calendar of Events ...conti medfrom page 1 National Events 3.75%, be allocated for state • 2002 International Public This year a number of bills and local infrastructure projects. Works Congress& were introduced to create an Exposition infrastructure fund. Some of Assuming annual General Fund September 2002. Seethe detailsails at the bills would dedicate one revenue growth after 2002-03 of at wwwapwanet. percent of the general fund to about 5019, the amount set aside infrastructure, while others for the infrastructure fund Local Events start at one percent and in- would be about $850 million in • Caltrans Stormwater Moni- crease the percentage over 2004-05 and would grow to toring Workshop time. A number of the bills about$4.5 billion in 2011-2012, June 26,2002 at the Air- commit the funds to state- and would thereafter grow by port Hilton,Oakland.For owned infrastructure projects, $38 million for every $1 billion more information,visit but not local projects. in General Fund revenue htto:/Iwwv�.dm.m.awan/env/ stomnmtsrhncechtm growth. • APWA South Bay& Engi- CaIRAC determined that ACA veers Club of Santa Clan 11, a bipartisan bill that would Given the state's current budget Valley-Annual Joint Golf amend the Constitution to cre- woes, it will take much courage Tennis Tournament ate an infrastructure fund for and foresight for this legislature July 12,2002 at the Sunol both state and local projects and Governor to enact ACA 11 Valley Golf Club and Santa was the most likely vehicle to or any other bill to put in place Clara Golf&Tennis Club advance. CaIRAC worked dedicated and consistent fund- (tennis).Reservations byJune with the bill's sponsors and its ing for California infrastructure. aid Tanaka )453Golf- ich- member organizations It's an uphill battle CaIRAC aid Tanaka(406)453- g P 5373;Tennis:Gay Pang (including APWA chapters) to will continue to wage. It's our (650)948-1030 mobilize grassroots support to mission. loin us. • Stormwater Workshop move the bill through the legis- November 14,2002 lative process. Learn more about CaIRAC, its (tentative date). NPDES mission and activities at Overview&New Provi- This proposed constitutional rvww.calrac.orr or contact us sions amendment (ACA 11) requires via e-mail (in(o(alcalrac.are) or Future Chapter Programs: drat increasing percentages of telephone (916-442-6911 x20). July 17,2002—APWA National annual General Fund revenues, • President Richard Riding:Advo- beginning at 1% and growing my for Public Works annually up to a maximum of • August -no meting- • September 18,2002—Joint ASCF/ APWA Picnic • October 16,2002—City of Seem- We're on the WebM mento/Marty Hanneman: Traffic Calming The Area P South Bay A Chapter of APWA now has its own website. Calmi • November 20,2002 SJSU/SCU Please visit us at Deparmreut Chair Presentation. hM,//soutbbmarea.apmo.net • December 18,2002—Christmas Gala CHRISTOPHER COX x'0�R"^""""°"°•0"'�8N1px0 IxwlxxEall POLICY MMMIIiFE S�Vp thwrw,hEw.G93BBo . 110115E IFApFP811V IMITv6-YIM $IffflMO CpANIxTFE .�f ,{G �E] G EIIEwr uE1 COMMEflcE coEaRrtE Congrea of the 41niteb btatto iVIMIWE5E1MCE3 C°MMmEE m•••• gouge of Aepresentatibes EMw...,o m DDu�n umu Muwm 1muw.P¢,um C•M•NM[MSPoxSOMD EMlPMOlE TEl[[Duu�xK�Dq uT May 21, 2002 Mr. Robert Ghirelli Director of Technical Services Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Ghirelli : It was a pleasure to have you in my Washington office recently. I am sorry I was unable to meet with you, but thank you for meeting with Kevin Logan in my stead. He has shared with me the legislative priorities of the Orange County Sanitation District and the OCSD' S plans to improve wastewater treatment. I am pleased to support the OCSD' s request for $3 million in the Fiscal Year 2003 VA/HUD Appropriations bill to upgrade the County's wastewater treatment system. I am committed to ensuring that our beaches remain safe for recreation and that the County's wastewater is treated properly. Please keep me apprised of your efforts to meet these challenges. Again, thank you for sharing with me your priorities for Congress, and thank you for your commitment to providing the residents of Orange County with the best possible sanitation service. Sincer y Christopher Cox U.S. Representative CCC:khl E Mu1: c11nMophw.cox@fl Whoo .gox CONOPE5310 O1.:M1IIpJ/cox.hp...g. P..CW.w E:flXPI/Wiry.Opu•e.pov ®mP DMKMUOPr R Sarah L Page 1 of 2 Tappan, Jean From: Anderson,Blake Sent: Friday,June 14,2002 3:34 PM To: Tappan,Jean Subject: FW:Thankslll bpard letter ----Original Message--- From: Catz, Sarah [mallto:smtz@Nossaman.com] Sent: Friday,June 14, 2002 2:27 PM To: 'bandemon@ocsd.com' Subject:ThanksllI Sarah L. Catz Center for Urban Infrastructure & Community Design 18101 Von Karman Ave., #1800 Irvine, CA 92612 (949) 477-7662 June 14, 2002 Blake Anderson, Chief Executive Officer Orange County Sanitation District PO Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Dear Blake: I would like to invite the Orange County Sanitation District to be a sponsor in the launch of the Center for Urban Infrastructure & Community Design. The Center is an academic and action-oriented institute that will be affiliated with the Institute of Transportation Studies at University of California, Irvine. The goal of the Center is to provide a vehicle for leadership in policy, planning and development of infrastructure that will enhance sustainable environmental development, economic growth and quality of life. The Center will provide an objective, interdisciplinary forum for addressing a wide range of policy issues relating to infrastructure, urban and community design. We will be convening experts from academia, government and industry and drawing upon the perspectives and insights of policy makers, managers, economists, lawyers, political scientists, and technologists in pursuit of our mission to advance the understanding of emerging issues in urban and community design. The Center would like your agency to be a founding sponsor. Participating sponsors will help to define the initial scope of the Centers work and be involved in program 6/17/2002 Sarah L Page 2 of 2 , development and implementation. - I will be calling you in a few days to discuss this exciting venture. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Sarah L. Catz 6/17/2002 USATODAY.com- Dog waste poses threat to water Page I of 4 '4SUMTOW SPECIAL SECTION: %USA TODAY CAREERS NETWORK Home • a - News Mein Categories saamh4 NewsTra cker - GOI I �US000xYl fexo Too News lR States Health & Science Washington/Polilics World •E-mail this s+nry •SnbrnceYthe nexvsnsoar •Sign-uofor Email never Editorial/Opine ovoWzaoz-u A ptlaled eP:er PM ET Health&Science c N su j Dog waste poses threat to water More News B Traci Watson, USA TODAY F Columnists Y 7- series City Guides For as long as the dog has been man's best Cities want to pick up'piles' T Government Guide friend, dog waste has posed a menace to By Traci Watson, USA TODAY Talk Today man's nose and foot. Now science has Money revealed a more unsavory truth: It's an Cities struggle with'dog piles' Sports environmental pollutant. Where they're cracking down: Side Life 101 Tech a San Diego.The city spent In the mid-1990s, scientists perfected roughly$10,000 on extra trash inclu Weather methods for tracking the origin of nasty tens,nagging signs and plastic cold, 'mutt mitts"at its Dog Beach, searoh ® bacteria in streams and seawater.From where the serf was closed to Clearwater,Fla., to Arlington, Va.,to swimmers 125 times in 2000. Site G wab O Boise the Vail has led straight to the The measures led to CI By tyces g "measurably fewer dog piles. hunched-up dog—and to owners who That's the tens we use,'says for Ted Medina,deputy director for don't pick up after their pets. coastal parks.He estimates the infc S EARCR FOR beach is 3V/-40%cleaner than NEWSPAPBIARTICLES At some beaches, dogs help raise bacteria a was before the effort startedlate last year. inim�lwliillevels so high that visitors must stay out of �-GE'r NEWS the water. Goaded by such studies, some Chattahoochee River sOe -IN YOUR INBDA cities have directed as much as$10,000 in National Recreation Area Click here to Oat the the last feW ears to encourage d0 near Atlanta.Bacteria levels in Daily Briefing in your Y g g the river exceed standards so inb_ox owners to clean up after their pets. A few often that a web site tells munici alities have started issuing would-be boaters and P g swimmers whether the river is citations to those who ignore pet clean-up safe on any given day.To help ordinances. clean it up,park officials recently started giving tickets to visitors who have dogs but no Many dog lovers are in denial about their doggie bags. pooches' leavings. But researchers have • Boulder,Colo.Here the named the idea that areas used by dogs problem wasn't dirty water but pump more bacteria into waterways—the the nitrogen In dog droppings. "Fido hypothesis." Native grasses in the city's YP mountain parks are used to low- nitrogen conditions. But with Dos are only one of man fixtures of dogs doing their business, g Y Y weeds were muscling aside the suburban America that add to water grasses.The city did 10 months pollution. Lawn fertilizers,rinse water of education before starting to hand out$100 fines last year. from driveways and motor oil commonly Boulder officials had to end up in streams and lakes. convince residents that dog waste'is not fenilizer,'says http://www.usatoday.com/news/bealthscience/science/2002-06-07-dog-usat.htm 6/17/2002 USATODAY.com- Dog waste poses threat to water Page 2 of 4 But unlike those sources,dogs generate Mike Pali n,co-director of open disease-causingbacteria that can make �`e and moemnin parrs. Some people really did believe people sick. Studies done in the last few a ' years put dogs third or fourth on the list of contributors to bacteria in contaminated waters. "Dogs are one of our usual suspects,' says Valerie Harwood,a microbiologist at the University of South Florida. "At certain sites,we find their effect to be significant." It doesn't take a Ph.D. to figure out that dog do is nasty. But it took science to determine how nasty it is. From mutt to blue-blooded champion,all dogs harbor so-called coliform bacteria, which live in the gut.The group includes E.coli,a bacterium that can cause disease,and fecal coliform bacteria, which spread through feces. Dogs also carry salmonella and giardia. Environmental officials use measurements of some of these bacteria as barometers of how much fecal matter has contaminated a body of water. This wouldn't matter if pet dogs were as rare as pet chinchillas. But four in 10 U.S. households include at least one dog, according to the American Pet Products Manufacturers Association.The association's statistics also show that Americans owned 54.6 million dogs in 1996 and 68 million dogs in 2000. Of that total,45% were "large" dogs—40 pounds or more. Those numbers add up to a lot of kibble.That wouldn't matter if all dog owners also owned a pooper-scooper. But several studies have found that roughly 40% of Americans don't pick up their dogs'feces(women are more likely to do so than men). New analysis provides answers The environmental impact of dog waste went unrecognized for decades. Then scientists developed lab techniques to determine the origin of fecal bacteria contaminating water.One method is a variant of DNA fingerprinting. Another method looks at the antibiotic resistance of microbes from different species. Scientists caution that the methods are still new. They are able to distinguish between major and minor sources of pollution,but they can't say with precision whether dogs contribute 20%or 30%of the pollution in a stream. "There's inherently some error," says Don Stoeckel, a microbiologist for the Ohio district of the U.S. Geological Survey who's studying bacteria-tracking methods. "I think the best(they)can do is give you some evidence of the magnitude of each source." Nonetheless,Stoeckel says, the analytical tools do provide useful information.Researchers have studied dozens of waterways.Wild birds and humans usually head the roster of who's fouling the water.But in http://www.usatoday.com/newslhealthscience/science/2002-06-07-dog-usat.htm 6/17/2002 USATODAY.com-Dog waste poses threat to water Page 3 of 4 some areas, dogs make significant deposits. At Morro Bay,Calif., for example,dogs contribute roughly 10% of the E. coli, says Christopher Kitts, a microbiologist at California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo. "And that can be the difference between a beach closing and a beach not closing," he says. Places where dogs dirty the water: • Stevenson Creek in Clearwater, Fla Residents were worried that a sewage treatment plant contaminated the creek. But when Harwood tested the water,she found that dogs, along with leaky septic tanks and wild animals, were to blame for high bacteria counts.Dog feces probably washed out of yards by the creek, Harwood says. • Four Mile Run in Arlington and Fairfax counties,Va. Studies show that dogs add to the contamination in this suburban Washington,D.C. stream.Officials calculate that the 12,000 dogs living in Four Mile Run's watershed leave behind more than 5,000 pounds of"solid waste" every day. • Boise River in Boise.The river suffers from high bacteria levels that make it unsuitable for swimming.Testing of streams and drainpipes flowing into the river showed that in urban areas, dogs were a leading culprit. In some spots, dogs and cats account for even more of the bacteria than human feces—from dysfunctional septic tanks and leaky sewage pipes—do. Fines don't sway some Even where dogs aren't the prime offenders,they're one of the few polluters authorities have control over. At many California beaches,for example,seagulls and other birds are most responsible for high bacteria levels. But federal laws protect birds. That leaves dogs. Officials know that they have a lot of educating to do before people realize their pooch can be a canine sewage pipe. Some people find it humiliating to carry a plastic bag. A survey by the Center for Watershed Protection in 1999 found that of the 41% of respondents who rarely or never clean up after their dogs, 44% would refuse to do so in the face of fines and neighbors' complaints. Reasons included, "because it eventually goes away," "small dog, small waste," and"just because." So more cities may follow the lead of Laguna Beach, Calif., a wealthy beach enclave. The city provides pooper-scoopers at the local dog park. But many people "don't take care of their little friends," says Victor Hillstead,the city's parks and buildings manager. So the city hired Entre-Manure,poop-scooping service based in nearby http://www.usatoday.com/news/healthscience/sciencet2002-06-07-dog-usat.htm 6/17/2002 USATODAY.com-Dog waste poses threat to water Page 4 of 4 Dana Point whose motto is VI in the#2 Business." Since the city's contract started in January,the service has collected 187 pounds of dog waste from the city. "I'm real proud of that fact," says Craig Stem, founder and chief picker-upper. '"That's pollution that'll never reach the ocean." Front Peas Mamma Money 52gLL[ke Tech Weathef Shin Terre of Menke Privaw Pol'cv How to adffl ttae AbMd u� ®CopydgM 2002 USA TODAY,a dwWon of Gannett Co Inc httpJ/www.usatoday.com/newsthealthscience/science/2002-06-07-dog-usat.htm 6/17/2002 Santa Ma Regional Water Duality Control Board's Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) for Sewers May 1,2002 ♦ Reduce sanitary sewer overflows(SSOs) ♦ Provide for uniformity in overflow reporting ♦ Improve surface water quality ♦ Provide a standardized asset management philosophy ♦ Ensure adequate funding or risk fines What Is It? Order R8-2002-0014 covering: ♦ Waste Discharge Requirements (18 pages) ♦ Monitoring and Reporting Program (11 pages) ♦ both available at- www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb& 1 Schedule ♦ Apr.26.2002 — Reporting of all SSOs and water quality monitoring ♦ Sep.30,2002— Development Plan and schedule for Sewer System Mgmt Plan(SSMP) ♦ Jan. 1,2003 —SSO Emergency Response Plan Schedule., ♦ June 15,2003—Preventative Maintenance Program ♦ July 30,2004 —Legal authority of the city or agency over connections ♦ Dec.30.2004—Grease disposal altemaoves Schedule nsre `•♦ Dec. 30,2004—Grease Control Program ♦ July 30,2005 —Capacity evaluation ♦ Sep. 30, 2005—Sewer Rehab Plan for entire system ♦ Sep.30,2005—Final SSMP 2 Waste Discharge Requirements ,CDR) Outcomes ♦ A local permit process for OCSD and Satellite sewer systems ♦ A written Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) • Disclosure of capacity management and design and construction standards � "R Outcomes r 4 ♦ Fines for spills and possibly program non-compliance ♦ Public disclosures of your Program and updates ♦ An office and field auditing process by the Regional Board ♦ A Sanitary Sewer Overflow(SSO)response, reporting,notification and management plan "R Outcomes ra a ♦ Grease control program and disposal alternatives • Disclosure of your legal authority over dischargers • Documented training and certification ♦ AHemall"defense provisions are possible because of your plan 3 OIPSD Internal Activities ♦ Preliminary WDR meetings held with satellite cities f agencies and Regional Board staff ♦ WDR Compliance Steering Committee formed to guide the future process ♦ Analyze new WDR for Divisional impacts ♦ City f agency O&M Outreach Program continues ♦ 5-year staffing plan impacts and FY 2W2-03 budget impacts 11OCSDInternalActivities w ♦ Co-Op Projects Program for influx f infiltration reduction continues ♦ Assist satellite cities/agencies as resources allow ♦ Look at a program management approach • Monitor EPA's proposed'CMOAT Program 1 r i0 0" ekl ➢i attic (,F& due out in October 2002 / WDR Steering Committee Assist the OCSD member cities and agencies in developing their proposed WDR compliance plan and continue to guide the long range implementation of the requirements Publicwods staff aum: Anshan Cosa Mesa SD to Haan Garden Grove Hustingionesagh Orange DCsD 4 .�Hbw Do We Begin? ♦ Read and analyze the new Requirements ♦ w .swrcb.m.gov/m eb8/ • Identify internal gaps • Develop a plan to close the gaps to meet the schedule dales • Further define all resource needs ♦ Support stairs efforts \ Cyts for OCSD • Long Range Capital Improvements Program (CIP)is currently budgeted ♦ Current O&M Program is budgeted annually and includes allowance for minor repairs ♦ Consulting fees for SSMP development are estimated at$700,000 to$800,000 thru 2005 t Costs for OCSD • Consulting fees for FOG component ere est. at under$300.000 for FY 2002-03 ♦ Internal labor estimates and future positions needed are to be determined ♦ Materials,supplies,equipment,and long range services are to be determined 5 Questions? wsRourwebske: Ww .00SD.00m 6 manatt Christine Diemer lger Manatt, Phelps& Phillips, LLP manatt I phelps I phillips Direct Dial: (714)371-2510 E-mail: ciger®manatt.com June 6, 2002 Municipal Storm Water Permit & Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) **U P D A T E** Manatt represents an ad hoc coalition of private sector business organizations and trade associations. The membership of the Coalition currently consists of twenty organizations. This includes: the California Association of Community Managers, Inc. ("CACM"), the Community Associations Institute, Orange County Regional Chapter ("CAUOC"), the Community Associations Institute, Greater Inland Empire Chapter ("CAUGRIE"), the Apartment Association of Orange County ("AAOC"), the Apartment Association of the Greater Inland Empire ("AAGIE"), the Orange County Housing Providers ("OCHP"), the four corporations that comprise Leisure World/Laguna Woods: Golden Rain Foundation ("GRF"), Third Laguna Hills Mutual ("TLHM"), United Laguna Hills Mutual ("ULHIll and Laguna Woods Mutual Fifty ("LWM50' , the Orange County Association of Realtors ("OCAR"), the South Orange County Regional Chambers of Commerce ("SOCRCC ), the Redlands Chamber of Commerce ("RCOC"), the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce ("LAACC'), the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce ("ACOC"), the Building Industry Association of Southern California, Orange County Chapter ("BIA/OC"), the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties, Southern California Chapter ("NAIOP/SC"), the Orange County Business Council ("OCBC"), the Building Industry Association of Southern California, Baldy View Chapter ("BIA/BV"), and the Building Industry Association, Riverside Chapter ("BIA/R"). Munidpal Storm Water Permits ➢ Los Angeles County Storm Water Permit (Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board): On December 13, 2001, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted the staff proposed Permit with very minor modifications. The hearing on the Permit lasted over four hours, during which many municipalities and businesses, including Manatt on behalf of the storm water coalition, provided comments on the Permit. The Coalition's major issue of concern was the vague language in the receiving water limitations section of the Permit. In response to the action taken by the Board, 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1250,Costa Mesa,Celromia 92626 Telephone: 714.371.2500 Fat: 714.371.2550 Los Angeles I Mexico City I Monterrey I Orange County I Palo Alto I Sacramento I Washington,D.C. manatt manatl I phelps I philllps June 6, 2002 Page 2 over fifty permittee cities, the LA Economic Development Corporation, BIA and the Construction Industry Coalition for Water Quality (CICWQ) have filed an administrative appeal to the State Water Board. The State Water Board denied the petitioners' requests for stay regarding the LA Storm Water Permit. The State Water Board staff issued a draft order on April 15, 2002, which granted a partial stay of certain Permit requirements that were due since the last date on which the SW RCB had to rule on the Petition (Nov. 2, 2002). The State Water Board reversed their prior (draft) order and denied the stay request in its entirety. The State Water Board stated that the petitioners did not bring forward sufficient evidence to justify the stay request. Orange County (North) Storm Water Permit (Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board): (Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Cypress, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine, La Habra, La Palma, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest Los Alamitos, Newport Beach, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Stanton, Tustin, Villa Park, Westminster, Yorba Linda) After hearings in September, December, and January, the regional board adopted the final North Orange County Permit. The Permit contains provisions requiring the permittees to review and revise their land use and planning provisions and project approval process. On behalf of the Coalition, Manaft argued that such an encroachment on local land use authority is contrary to federal and state law. Manatt successfully clarified on the record, on behalf of the Coalition, an interpretation of "maximum extent practicable," so that it is not "maximum extent possible," and may take into account If it is economically or technologically feasible. The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) has stated that the Permit is "inadequate," and has accordingly filed an appeal with the State Water Board. The County of Orange has also filed an administrative appeal with the State Water Board. Orange County (South) Storm Water Permit (San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board): (Atka Viejo, Dana Point, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, San Clemente,San Juan Capistrano) The South Orange County Permit, as adopted (in February 2002) places a financial burden on local governments to implement and enforce unfeasible standards regarding storm water and urban runoff on new residential and commercial developments, as well manatt manatt I phalm I phlllips June 6, 2002 Page 3 as projects for the renovation or redevelopment of existing properties. Manatt testified on behalf of the Coalition in conjunction with all co-permittees. The County of Orange, along with several south Orange County cities, has filed an administrative appeal with the State Water Board. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Riverside County Storm Water Permit (Colorado River Basin, Santa Ana and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards): Hearing (tentative): September 6, 2002— City Council Chambers of Loma Linda In September 2001, the Colorado River Basin Board issued a storm water NPDES Permit for areas of Riverside County. At the May 31, 2002 workshop before the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board, Manatt, on behalf of the Southern California Water Quality Coalition, provided comments on the proposed Permit. The Regional Board tentatively scheduled another workshop on the matter to take place in Riverside County, with the adoption hearing tentatively set to take place in September. San Bernardino County Storm Water Permit (Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lohantan Regional Water Quality Control Board): On April 26, 2002, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board ("SARWQCB") adopted the San Bernardino County Storm Water Permit. Manatt, on behalf of the storm water coalition, participated in the January workshop and filed written comments. At the April 26 adoption hearing, in support of the BIA, Manatt provided testimony that was instrumental in convincing the SARWQCB that additional time was necessary to allow the municipalities and other stakeholders ample opportunity to develop and submit regional watershed solution options to the Regional Board for approval. The SARWOBB agreed to extend the deadline from July 1, 2003 to January 1, 2004 for the submittal of regional watershed solutions. If this deadline is not met, then the site-by-site (SUSMP) structural BMPs will be required. There are still issues of concern remaining in the Permit. However, these are issues in which the SARWQCB is relying on prior State Board decisions as precedence for the language in the permit. Currently, there are no storm water Permits for areas of San Bernardino County being considered by either the Colorado River Basin Regional Board or the Lohantan Regional Board. manatt manatt I Phelps I Phillips June 6, 2002 Page 4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ➢ San Diego County Storm Water Permit (State Water Regional Control Board): Manatt participated on behalf of the storm water coalition before the State Water Board in assistance to the BIA San Diego Petition concerning the San Diego County Permit. The State Water Board incorporated our comments on the "into" provisions included in the Permit and ordered that the "into" provision in the receiving water limitations section be deleted. Unfortunately, the State Water Board found that the federal practicability standard was not required as long as the regional board adopted an iterative approach to its storm water requirements. This allows regional boards to impose mitigation requirements that don't take into consideration those being carried out by localities. The State Water Board's failure to require the federal practicability standard despite the clear language of the Clean Water Act ("CWA") remains a concern. Litigation was filed in December 2001 by the Building Industry Association of San Diego County, the Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation, the California Business Properties Association, the Construction Industry Coalition for Water Quality, the San Diego County Fire Districts Association, the City of Santee, and the City of San Marcos. A motion to dismiss, filed by the California Attorney General, was heard in March and denied. Regional Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) Updates ➢ Santa Ana Basin Triennial Review of the Water Quality Control Plan (Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board): Stakeholder Meetino: June 14, 2002, Highgrove Room, Suite 200, 3737 Main Street (California Tower state office building), Riverside: 10 a.m. Public Hearing:July 19, 2002, Orange County Water District, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley: 9 a.m. Manatt, on behalf of the Southern California Water Quality Coalition, participated in the April 26 workshop before the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The manatt manatt I phelps I phlllips June 6, 2002 Page 5 Coalition provided testimony that urged the Regional Board, in the course of the review process, to invest significant resources into determining the overall cost and housing impacts that any revisions might have. Manatt also addressed concerns about the Regional Board's commitment of most of the Basin Plan's resources (32 out of 54.5 personnel years) to TMDL development, substantially deferring other vitally important issues. Manatt also raised concerns about the Regional Board's proposed additions to the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list of impaired water bodies. Specifically, the Coalition suggested that the proposed list was overly broad, and inappropriately applied beneficial use designations to various waterbodies. Furthermore, these listings did not properly take into consideration "past, present, and probable future uses." To illustrate this point, the Coalition raised the example of the Delhi Channel. A fenced-in, concrete- lined stone channel, the recommendations of the Regional Board were to apply recreational and drinking water standards to this body of water. The Coalition went on to recommend that, in developing revisions of the Basin Plan, the Regional Board consider the attainability of the its water quality objectives. ➢ Santa Ana Region Revision of CalifomWs Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Segments (California Regional Water Quality Control Board): On May 30, 2002, Manatt testified, on behalf of the Southern California Water Quality Coalition, before the State Water Resources Control Board on the revision of the Section 303(d) list for Region 8 (Santa Ana) matters. The Coalition expressed its concerns that, in its recommendations to the State Water Board, that the Regional Board applied inappropriate water quality objectives and beneficial uses to many of its proposed revisions. The Coalition urged that the State Water Board, before adopting the proposed revisions, consider the condition of a waterbody, the overall advantage of achieving a given designated use, and the cost of achieving a designated use. To that end, the Coalition questioned the appropriateness of beneficial use designations for flood control channels, like the Delhi Channel. Manatt also urged the State Water Board to adopt an approach that is as technically proficient and economically efficient as possible, ensuring consistency with section 13241 of the State's water code. Manatt Attomey Contacts: Christine Diemer Iger William R. Devine 714.371.2510 714.371.2526 ciaer@manatt.com wdevine®manatt.com 1 manatt maned I phelps I phlllips June 6, 2002 Page 6 Disclaimer. Maned, Phelps & Phillips, LLP updates provide general Information about events of current legal significance. The information contained in this update is necessarily general and, in the Interest of brevity,may not encompass all relevant legal authority. In addition,this information's applicability to a particular set of facts and circumstances may vary. Therefore, this update is not is not intended to, and does not, constitute legal advice. COPYRIGHT 2002 by Maned, Phelps&Phillips, LLP.All rights reserved.Manes, Phelps&Phillips, LLP, 12th Floor, Center Tower,650 Town Center Drive;Costa Mesa,CA 92626;Phone:714.3712500; Fax 714.371.2550 website: wwy,manad.com QDPrIA1 Kl0Tirr9: TO THE ATTENDING PUBLIC: The Board will initially convene into closed session at 6:30 p.m., on June 26, 2002. Regular business will be conducted in open session after 7:30 p.m. For the members of the public who wish to address the Board under Item 7 (Public Comments), you can anticipate that to occur no sooner than 7:45 p.m., and perhaps you may wish to take this into account as you plan for evening schedule. Please call Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, at (714) 593-7120 on the day of the meeting to receive current information about when public comments will be heard. i T AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING June 26, 2002—6:30 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 64957.6, as noted. Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. 06/26/02 Page 2 'r a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with Blake Anderson, General Manager, Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Director, and Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel, re Classification and Compensation Study Results—Labor Market Position (Government Code Section 54957.6) b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 6. a. Nomination and election of Chair(effective July 1, 2002) b. Nomination and election of Vice Chair(effective July 1, 2002) 7. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 8. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 9. If no corrections or amendments are made,the minutes for the special meeting held on May 15, 2002, and for the regular meeting held on May 22, 2002, will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 10. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 05/15/02 05/31/02 Totals $10,936,968.73 $4,548,916.32 r.' 06/26/02 Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director or staff member, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 11. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-11, Establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2002-03 for the District in accordance with the Provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code. b. Approve Assignment of Contract of Professional Services Agreement from m2T Technologies for Plant No. 2 Oxygen Plant Replacement/Rehabilitation Assessment, Job No. SP-72, to DWG Associates. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 12. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re June 26, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 22,2002 to be filed. C. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the June 26. 2002 meeting. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re the June 5, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 5, 2002 to be filed. 06/26/02 Page 4 C. Authorize the General Manager to finalize negotiations and subsequently award a contract to Systime Computer Corporation for JD Edwards OneWorid Implementation, Specification No. S-2001.6213D, providing for the migration and upgrade of the District's Financial Information System,for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000,which includes a $350,000 contingency. d. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and subsequently award a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Brown & Caldwell Consulting providing for consulting services in connection with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's newly adopted Waste Discharge Requirements,in an amount not to exceed $700,000, for the contract period of July 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004. e. (1) Approve Change order No. 1 to P.O. No. 101150 issued to Hill Brothers Chemical Company,for the Purchase of Magnesium Hydroxide Solution, Specification No. C-2002-83BD,for odor and corrosion control in the Newport Trunklines, providing for a time extension of two months (through August 31, 2002),for an additional amount not to exceed $80,000,for a total contract amount not to exceed $175,000; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to competitively bid and subsequently award the Purchase of Magnesium Hydroxide Solution, Specification No. C-2002-95BD, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for a total amount not to exceed $493,000. including a 20% contingency amount of$83,000,for the period September 1, 2002 through August 31. 2003, with two one-year renewal options to include a 10%annual cost escalation. f. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award a sole source contract with US Peroxide Inc.,for a one-year demonstration of a proprietary chemical process consisting of ferrous chloride and hydrogen peroxide treatment for odor and corrosion control in the Miller-Holder, Knott and Baker-Gisler trunklines,for the period August 1, 2002 through July 31, 2003,for an estimated amount not to exceed $2,434,000,which includes a contingency amount of$116,000. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re the June 6, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 6, 2002 to be filed. C. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Law/Crandall and Ninyo & Moore, to provide for Materials Testing, Inspection, and Geotechnical Engineering Service, Specification No. PSA-2001-33BD,for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for each agreement($260,000 total). d. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Smith-Emery GeoServices for Materials Testing and Geotechnical Engineering Services, Specification No. PSA-2002-3313D, for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for a one-year f 06/26/02 Page 5 period effective July 1, 2002, with the option to renew for one additional year for an amount not to exceed $100,000. e. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush &Associates, to provide for Surveying Services, Specification No. PSA-2001-348D, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $170,000 for each agreement($510,000 total). f. Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Electro Test Inc., to provide Electrical Acceptance Testing Services, Specification No. PSA-2001-35BD,for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $150,000. g. Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46, with Ken Thompson, Inc., authorizing an addition of$121,341, increasing the total contract amount to$5,716,066. h. Ratify Change Order No. 10 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M. N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$107,027 and a time extension of 63 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$10,782,595. 1. (1) Approve a budget amendment of$243,204 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, for a total budget of$1,982,281; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $243,204 and a time extension of 126 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,362,281. j. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$94,036 for Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, for a total budget of$566,236; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Junction Structure Upgrade,Job No. SP2000-29, with Mike Prlich and Sons, authorizing an addition of$37,483.03 and a time extension of 168 days, increasing the total contract amount to$389,736; and (3)Accept Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. k. (1) Receive and file plans and specifications for Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-90; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to award a Contract to the lowest bidder for an amount not to exceed the engineer's estimate of$1,675,000. I. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services,for Space Allocation & Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84, providing for additional conceptual design work for an additional amount of $34,200, increasing the total amount not to exceed $463,000. 06/26/02 Page 6 I M. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.,for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, providing for Construction Support Services in the amount of$965,264, for a total amount not to exceed $3,270,744. n. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, providing for additional engineering services, authorizing staff to reallocate funds for an amount not to exceed $784,769,with no increase in the total contract amount of$3,807,047. 0. (1)Approve plans and specifications for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file letter dated May 14, 2002, from Colich & Sons, L.P., the apparent low bidder, requesting to be relieved from their bid due to a mathematical error, (4)Approve the request of Colich & Sons, L.P. for release from their bid; (5)Adopt report of General Counsel dated June 10, 2002, pursuant to California Public Contracts Code Section 5101(b), establishing facts by which release from its bid is granted to Colich & Sons, L.P.; (6) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (7)Award a construction contract to Steve P. Rados, Inc., for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, for an amount not to exceed $30,003,210. 16. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the June 12, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 12, 2002 to be filed C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of May 2002. d. Authorize an increase to the Temporary Employment Services authorization by an additional $250,000, raising the authorized amount from $1,300,000 to $1,550.000 for the remainder of FY 01-02. e. Approve proposed Operating, Capital, Debt/COP Service and Self-Insurance Budgets for 2002-03, as follows: Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $65.421,200 Worker's Compensation Self Insurance 429,000 General Liability and Property Self-Insurance 2,429.500 Collection System Operating 15,135,000 Capital Improvement Program 154.400,000 Debt/COP Service 38,995,000 f. Renew the District's All-Risk Property and Earthquake Insurance Program for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003, in an amount estimated not to exceed $1.300.000. O6/26/02 Page 7 g. Renew the District's Excess General Liability Insurance Program for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003, in an amount estimated not to exceed $205,000. 17. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re June 10, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 13, 2002 to be filed. C. (1)Approve Trojan Technologies as the ultraviolet light(UV)equipment manufacturer for the Groundwater Replenishment System based on lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$20,253,000, and a total capital cost of $9.749,405. plus tax; (2)Approve a Pre-Selection Agreement between Orange County Water District(OCWD) and Trojan Technologies to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District; (3) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the UV equipment to the construction contract to install the demonstration UV system at a total cost of$849,842, plus tax; and (4) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the UV equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV system at a total estimated capital cost of$8,649,563, plus tax. d. Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp, Dresser& McKee Inc. for an additional amount of$557,697. for a total amount not to exceed $35,890,804, for a cost-of-living increase of 2.7%for 2002 in accordance with the PSA for the Groundwater Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$278,849. 18. Authorize the General Manager to competitively bid and subsequently award the purchase of the following chemicals in connection with the ocean outfall bacteria reduction program: (a) Sodium Hypochlorite, Specification No. C-2002-98BD, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for an estimated amount of$4,038,000,for the period August 1, 2002 through July 31, 2003, with four one-year renewal options to include not more than a 10% annual cost escalation, if necessary; and, (b) Sodium Bisulfite, Specification No. C-2002-102BD, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for an estimated amount of$800,000,for the period August 1, 2002 through July 31, 2003, with four one-year renewal options to include not more than a 10% annual cost escalation, if necessary. O6/26/02 Page 8 f 19. (1)Authorize the General Manager to solicit proposals, negotiate,and award a new contract for the Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. C-2002-101 BD, to be effective August 1, 2002 for an estimated annual amount of$1,809,000; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager, or his designee, to negotiate fixed prices under the Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. C-2002-101 BD contract, if market conditions are favorable, without further Board authorization. 20. (1)Approve plans and specifications for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and Recommendation;and (4)Award a Construction Contract to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc.,for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2,for an amount not to exceed $14.066,442. 21. Approve plans and specifications for Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1, to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and Recommendation; and, (4)Award a construction contract to Mike Priich & Sons, Inc.for Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, for an amount not to exceed $596.370. 22. Receive and file Addendum No. 5 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, prepared by K.P. Lindstrom, Inc., for the Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-90. 23. Recess by Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District 24. Call to Order, Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation. a. Roll Call b. If no corrections or amendments are made, the Minutes for the meeting held on September 26, 2001, will be deemed approved, and be so ordered by the Chair. C. Report of the Director of Finance 25. Adjoum, Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation. 26. Reconvene, Board of Directors, Orange County Sanitation District 27. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 28. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 29. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for July 17, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. 30. Adjournment 06/26/02 t Page 9 1 NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 Director of Finance Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 Director of Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 Director of Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 Director of Operations& Maintenance Bob Dolan (714)593-7020 Director of Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714)593-7400 Director of Information Technology Patrick Miles (714)593-7280 Communications Manager Lisa Murphy . (714) 593-7120 Assistant to General Manager Greg Mathews (714)593-7104 G:\wp.dW\i,gend9Zwrd Agendas\2002 Smrd AgendW052202 agenda.dx 9 r Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING MAY 15, 2002 OJN�V SANlrgr�Oy p�� �• OWN 2 � a � ¢ c+ o � �cr�b NE ENv`�00 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 e Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 I 05/15t02 ROLL CALL A special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on May 15, 2002, at 6:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Shirley McCracken,Vice Chair Tom Daly X Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory A Shawn Boyd John Larson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller Debbie Cook X Connie Boardman X Laurann Cook Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue David Shawver X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley X Beth Krom Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater Pat McGuigan X Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X I Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P.Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Jeff Reed; Sonja Wassgren; Jennifer Cabral; Lynn Jensen; Juanita Skillman; George Robertson; Mike Moore; Sam Mowbray; Charles McGee; Kelly Christiansen OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Alternate Director Grace Epperson; Dan Hughes; Patricia Holden; Cynthia Cudaback; Mariana Noble; Burt Jones; Leslie Rosenfeld; John Largier; Stanley Grant; Brett Sanders; Don Ito; Art Perry; Sean Fitzgerald; Larry Honeybourne; Don May; Julia Puentes; Mike Noonan; Chris Previatt; Don Lucas; Robert 1 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 05/15/02 I Beardsley, Irwin Haydock; Jan Vandersloot; Larry Porter; Randy Fuhnman; Dennis Baker, Doug Korthof; Eileen Murphy; Don McGee; Peer Swan; Joan Irvine Smith; Ed Guilmette; G. Van Drie; Greg Jewell; Don Schulz; Irwin Haydodk; Dean Retnemann; Maryanne Skorpanich; Pat Brennan; Dave Montague;Terry E. Slake; Dave Wielenga; Ann Norris; Phyllis Grifman; Tony Jones; Karin Moran; David Webb REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Eckenrode welcomed the research team and peer review panel members and thanked them for their hard work. He acknowledged this meeting was very important for two reasons: (1)the long-awaited science regarding the district's ocean discharge would be presented by the researchers and independent peer review panel of experts, who have examined the data. These researchers and experts represent highly respected and well-known oceanographic institutions in the country; and (2)This meeting begins the dialogue that the Board of Directors must undertake regarding the critical policy decision of what level of wastewater treatment technology the District should implement in the future that will adequately protect public health and the environment. At this meeting, and the next special meeting to be held on June 19'", the Board of Directors will hear about: (1)The science, and the condusion of last summer's ocean studies; (2)The technology, and what treatment process alternatives are available for the Directors' consideration; (3)The finances, the costs and user fee implications; (4)The regulations, and the federal and state rules that govern the District; and (5)The public, and what the District has heard from the public in the form of opinion polls, letters, a-mails and phone calls. Chair Eckenrode also announced that the regular meeting of May 22n°would be held at 6:30 p.m.,go into dosed session immediately then convene into regular session around 7:00 p.m. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel,Thomas L. Woodruff, reported that a great deal of input is expected, both verbal and written, regarding the level of treatment of the District's ocean discharge. Notice has been given to all interested parties,and noted on the agenda that the public is urged to submit their remarks in writing. He also reported that a 30-minute period for public comments would be held at the end of this evening's presentation. Summer 2001 Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Technical Reports Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, stated that this meeting would inform the Board of Directors on the results of the offshore scientific studies that have been completed,what the Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 05/15/02 researchers reviewed along the shoreline, and also begin a dialogue that will be continued over the coming months, eventually leading to a decision by the Directors on the appropriate level of treatment that the District will pursue. That decision will provide the direction staff will need to prepare the application for the District's application for an ocean discharge permit. Mr. Ghirelli stated the scientists who conducted the studies will be presenting the results of the investigation that was conducted last summer. The study was authorized by the Directors last year,and was designed to answer whether the District's treated wastewater discharge is a contributor to the bacteria contamination problem at Huntington Beach. The researchers are now ready to report to the Directors the preliminary results, findings, and conclusions of the studies.The Directors would also hear from other researchers whose work is more focused on land-based sources. The beach contamination problem at Huntington Beach is complex and made up of multiple sources that cumulatively contribute to the problem. In 1999 staffs initial focus was off-shore. After$2 million of studies, it was concluded that the problem didn't appear to be the plume. Staff then began looking on-shore and found that urban run-off appeared to be part of the problem. More research was undertaken to gain a better understanding of what was going on onshore, in the Talbert Marsh and in the Santa Ana River. A report was prepared by Professor Stanley Grant and his colleagues at UCI, which was published in November 2000. His report implicated some of those land-based sources and also suggested that the District's offshore discharge could be a contributor to the problem, as well. It was reported that in June the board will be informed on the technology, costs, and rates associated with various treatment alternatives and the public input. At the regular meeting of June 261' , the Board of Directors will be asked to make a decision weighing the science and other factors to make a decision about the appropriate level of treatment. Kelly Christiansen, Source Control Supervisor, then reviewed the findings that resulted from the District's onshore investigation. He reported that several sources of land-based contamination had been identified and corrected. Dr. Stanley Grant of UCI presented his preliminary results on his study of the Santa Ana River. The focus of this study was to quantity the flow of fecal indicator organisms, as well as other types of pollutants, from the Santa Ana River Watershed into the ocean. The study was also to determine if surf zone water quality impairment of Huntington Beach was caused by fecal pollution from onshore sources, such as urban runoff, etc.,or caused by offshore sources such as the District's treated wastewater. He stated he found no evidence to suggest that the fecal indicator bacteria (FIBS)found at the mouth of the river are coming from off-shore sources, but were coming from local land-based sources. Dr. Grant also stated that the test results suggest that fecal indicator viruses (FIVs)found in the surf zone could be coming from an offshore source such as the outfall. Breft Sanders of UCI presented findings on a paper he co-authored entitled'Cross-Shelf Transport at Huntington Beach—Implications for the Fate of Sewage Discharged through an Offshore Ocean Ouffall". He reported that the District's plume was observed shoreward of the outfall, but not reaching the shoreline. He also reported there was no evidence of the District's plume contributing to the poor water quality of Huntington Beach. i Minutes for Board Meeting ; Page 5 I 05/15/02 Marlene Noble of the US Geological Survey, then reported on the Offshore Investigation. The official report will not be final until October. To date, she reported that the study has not found a connection between the District's ocean discharge and the bacterial contamination on the beaches. Cynthia Cudaback of UC Santa Barbara then reviewed the preliminary findings of the Peer Review Panel. The purpose of the panel was to determine whether data collection and analysis of collected data were appropriate to answer questions concerning the transport of the District's plume onshore and whether it could account for bacterial contamination on the beach. She reported that a connection could not be found between the District's plume and beach contamination events. She also suggested further analyses are needed. The final report would be completed in October. Directors then entered into discussion and asked questions of the panel. PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons expressed their opposition to the waiver: Jan Vandersloot; Robert Beardsley; Randy Fuhrman; Eileen Murphy; Dennis Baker, Larry Porter; Don May; Irwin Haydock; Don McGee; Peer Swan; Doug Korthoff; Joan Irvine Smith. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:46 p.m. A J Secretaryry ib the Board oqf hectors of Orange County Sanitatiby District Wwp.dta�gendaQoam Mlnut %2002 amid Minutes\042402 minutes.dm , Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING MAY 22, 2002 saWrgray a A h rFCr�NG ENV��O ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 05/22/02 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held-on May 22. 2002, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Shirley McCracken,Vice Chair Tom Day X Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Patricia Campbell John Larson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Laurann Cook Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue David Shawver X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer Jon M. Gullixson X Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley X Beth Krom Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Stmonoff X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow A Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P.Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Dolan; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Jan Collins; John Linder; Jeff Reed; OTHERS PRESENT:Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Doug Johnson; Trung Minh Thai; Don Steven; Linda Nicholas; Paul Maguera; Hoynh Hoe Thi Le; Kent Huynh; Rob Nelson; Roy Nakamora; Robert Caustin; Irwin Haydock; Lisa Rosen; Doug Korthof;Vargas Oberschlake; Bill Orton; Robin Rustan; Joey Racano; Jan Vandersloot; Don Schulz; John Earl; Stephanie Minutes for Board Meeting ' Page 3 05/22/02 ° Bergen; Greg Jewell; Larry Porter; Lisa Rosen; Christie Peck; Don McGee; Allan Beek; Nancy Donavan; Samuel Fuller; Richard Stuetzel; Bob Lockhart; R. Thatcher PUBLIC COMMENTS Chair Eckenrode recognized Chris Townsend of Townsend Public Affairs who updated the Directors on the Groundwater Replenishment System project. He reported the project received funding of$30,000,000 from the State Department of Water Resources,which is the single largest grant from their program. A public hearing was held the day before. A final decision will be made on June W. The project will face funding challenges by the Central West Basin as they did not receive any funding at all. Chair Eckenrode reported that the remaining portion of public comments would be heard after closed session. 4. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54957.6 and 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 6:50 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9,to discuss Agenda Item Nos. 4 (a)(1), (2)and (3). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item Nos. 4(a)(1), (2) and (3). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:12 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Shawn Boyd for his contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons spoke about ocean discharge issues and expressed their opposition to the waiver:Vangee Oberschlake; Bill Orton; Robin Rustan; Joey Racano; Jan Vandersloot; Don Schulz; John Earl; Linda Nicholas; Stephanie Bergen; Greg Jewell; Larry Porter, Doug Korthof; Lisa Rosen; Christie Peck; Don McGee; Don Slaven; Allan Beek; Nancy Donavan; Samuel Fuller, Rob Nelson. Public Comments made regarding proposed Ordinance No. 18 are reflected under Agenda Item No. 19. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 05/22/02 REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Eckenrode presented Gary Streed, Director of Finance,with two awards the District earned for financial reporting: (1)the Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, and (2)the Distinguished Budget Presentation award. The District has won both of these awards for the last several years. It was then announced that a special Board meeting would be held on Wednesday, June I& beginning at 6:00 p.m. This meeting is for a presentation on the technical,financial, regulatory and public participation elements of the treatment level decision. This meeting will complete the round of special meetings designed to provide the Board of Directors with an overview of all of the major issues related to the ocean discharge decision. The Chair reviewed the June committee meetings, and reported that the OMTS Committee would not be participating in a tour at Plant 2. The Directors were reminded that the operating committees would not be meeting in July, but will resume with the regular schedule in August. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff reported on two items of litigation. The case entitled Tran v. Orange County Sanitation District had been settled for$95,000. He also reported that property damage case in Newport Beach involving a District's contractor who installed new facilities has been settled for$40,000. This case involved a home that suffered damages due to the contractor's pile driving which was approximately 12 feet away from the residence. The District and the contractor shared equally in the settlement costs. Mr. Woodruff then reported that the Steering Committee is recommending that an item be added to the agenda which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Find that the matter arose subsequent to the posting of the Agenda, pursuant to authority of California Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); and (2) Add Item No. 23 to the Agenda, authorizing the General Manager to enter into purchase agreements for equipment and to bid, as necessary as an expedited procedure,for construction needed in connection to the Short-Term Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-67, relative to an expedited procedure. NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS This being the annual meeting fixed by the Board at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District, the Secretary declared the nominations open. Y Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 05/22/02 Directors Shirley McCracken and Brian Brady were then nominated as candidates for the office of Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular June Board meeting. The Secretary reported that the election would be held on June 26, 2002 in accordance with the Board's Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the District. Nominations and elections of a Vice Chair will also be held at the regular June meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 2002 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 04/15/02 04/30/02 Totals $10,159,129.46 $4,912,991.68 Director Mark Leyes abstained. CONSENT CALENDAR 10. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Gene Sobel requesting annexation of 0.505 acres to the District in the vicinity of Via Vista Drive and Cooks Comer in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-08, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-24-Sobel Annexation). b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 100535-OB, issued to OCB Reprographics for Specification No. 9900-05, for an additional amount of$14,000,for a total amount not to exceed $124,000, providing for additional copying services. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Pall Corporation v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 02CC06622, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the May 22, 2002 meeting. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 i 05/22/02 Committee Chair Eckenrode reported Directors Gullixson, Jempsa, Neugebauer, Piercy and Silva attended the CASA meeting held on May 1`44 . The meeting covered a wide range of issues related to pending legislation and new environmental and employment laws. The Committee was given an update on the status of the Maddox Bill,which has been approved by the Assembly Appropriations Committee and is now before the full Assembly for consideration. A progress report was also provided on the Harman Bill which has moved successfully through the Assembly and has been referred to the Senate. The Steering Committee directed Mr. Anderson to send a letter to SAWPA requiring early resolution of the$3 million that SAW PA owes the District for work on the SARI Line relocation project The Committee also directed staff to charge new connection charges consistent with the adopted fee schedules, but to allow time payments for large sums due. Staff was also asked to prepare a white paper discussing the pros and cons and summary of the logistics of placing a ballot measure regarding the ocean discharge question on the November ballot. The Committee determined it would recommend to the full Board that Agenda Item No. 16(c)be referred back to the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee. In preparation for the upcoming June 26' Board meeting, staff was to continue to assume a decision would be made at the meeting on the level of treatment,and staff was directed to provide an outline of the alternatives without a recommendation. It was also determined that the June 26' Board meeting would begin at 6:30 p.m., and immediately go into closed session. The meeting should reconvene into open session at 7:00 p.m. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 24, 2002 to be filed. 13. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the May 1, 2002 meeting. Director McGuigan reminded the members of the Committee that the meeting for June 5"would be held at Plant 1 at 5:00 p.m. The tour at Plant 2 had been cancelled. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 1, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 6 to Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of District's Residual Solids with Synagro West, Inc. (formerly known as Pima Gro Systems, Inc.), providing for an extension of the contract for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005, with two additional one-year extensions, at the current all-weather cost of$39.50 per wet ton of biosolids managed for an annual amount not to exceed $2,054,000. Minutes for Board Meeting , Page 7 05/22/02 14. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Anderson, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the May 2, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 2, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Chemical Facility Mod'dicabons, Job No. P1-46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53,with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$4,784 and a time extension of 28 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,676,925; and (2)Accept Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P146-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black &Veatch Corporation for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, providing for additional design engineering services in the amount of$229,600,for a total amount not to exceed $3,711,523. 15. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Leyes, Vice Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the May B. 2002 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 8, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2002. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the 2001-02 Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ending March 31, 2002. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2002 through March 31, 2002. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Renew the District's Boiler& Machinery Insurance Program for the period May 15, 2002 to May 15,2003, with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $91,696. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve SAFETY-POL-104 and 106, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 05/22/02 h. It was moved and seconded to consider adoption of Resolution No. OCSD 02-09, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33,Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for(1) Change the title and pay range of current Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($4,469-$6,324)to Principal Contracts Administrator at pay range E12($5,708- $8,076); and (2) Create Employee Development Supervisor classification at pay range Ell ($5,430-$7,683). Directors were concerned with a possible conflict regarding the approval of the item and direction given in closed session earlier that evening. Directors entered into discussion on the need to be competitive in the market place. Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, advised that the District generally hires employees at mid-point of a salary range. A substitute motion was then made to defer Item 15(h) until receipt of the final report. The substitute motion failed. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02- 09,Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for(1) Change the title and pay range of current Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($4,469 -$6,324)to Principal Contracts Administrator at pay range E12 ($5,708 - $8,076); and (2) Create Employee Development Supervisor classification at pay range Ell ($5,430-$7.683). There were five no votes on this item. 16. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Russ Patterson, representative on the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on May 13, 2002. Director Patterson urged the Directors to read the minutes of May I regarding the discussion between Board members and the project. The Orange County Water District's new general manager has asked for a study asking questions that have already been answered previously. Director Patterson also reported that the total amount of grants awarded to this project to date is$91,234,556. The committee was also informed that Tom Dawes, the project manager of the project, would be retiring on May W. The Chair ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 22, 2002 to be filed. C. Item removed. 17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2,Job No. SP2000-61, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a Construction Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 05/22/02 Contract to Manuel Bros., Inc. for Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, for an amount not to exceed $243,500. 18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to plans and specifications for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a construction contract to Green Giant Landscape, Inc. for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-84, for an amount not to exceed $400,426. 19. Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-18,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-15: a. General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff gave a brief report on the proposed ordinance, which increases the sewer service fees effective July 1, 2002. b. The Board Secretary reported that a total of 184 written comments had been received regarding the sewer service fee, of which 161 opposed the rate increase and 23 were in support of the rate increase. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the written comments be received and ordered filed. C. OPEN HEARING: The Chair declared the hearing opened at 9:58 p.m. The Chair recognized the following persons who addressed the Board regarding the sewer service fee increase: Richard Stuetzel, Villa Park, questioned why rates could not be based on occupancy rather than a flat rate for single families. Bob Lockhart, Westminster, opposed the rate increase based on information he had obtained that multiple parcels throughout the District's jurisdiction have not been billed the sewer service charge for the last four years. He also identified some of the larger users of sewer service in the County, and claimed their assessments for the last four years were not commensurate with the usage. Rich Thatcher, Newport Beach, questioned why a rate increase was needed. He was also confused with language in the notice and tax bill, references containing sewer charge, user rates and assessments. Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, responded to Mr. Thatcher's questions. He explained that the language in the Ordinance is almost identical to language in the state law by which the District must adhere. He further explained that the county tax collector has chosen to use the word "assessment" on the tax bills. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 10 05/22/02 He assured Mr. Thatcher the charge was not an assessment, and that sewer charge is the correct terminology. - Gary Streed, Director of Finance, stated the rate increase is required to fund additional costs, which are both operational and maintenance, as well as a portion of the capital improvement program. Bill Orton, Seal Beach, urged the Board of Directors to not raise rates. Randy Fuhrman, Huntington Beach,spoke in support of the rate increase. Anita Bryant. Santa Ana, spoke against the rate increase and was concerned that senior citizens on a fixed income would not be able to afford increase. Helen Cranz, Midway City, requested the District find another way to charge individuals and businesses for their fair share. She was concerned over multiple families living in one home paying the same rate as a two-person family pays. Bob Eden, Midway City, questioned the rate structure applied to large industrial users, and asked if and how the water was metered. Gary Streed, Director of Finance, then explained the DistricPs fee formula: (1) Residential rates are collected on the property tax bill; (2)There are approximately 20 rates for non-residential properties based on the type of business; and (3)A separate set of fees applies to about 400 users called permit users, due to the type or amount of discharge they have. This fee is billed directly to the company based on actual flow and strength of wastewater measured in BOD and solids. d. CLOSE HEARING:There being no further public comments, the Chair declared the hearing closed at 10:08 p.m. e. Director Leyes briefly commented on the process of development of more equitable fees over the last few years,which were based on very sound principles of science, engineering and finance. However, he was opposed to approval of the rate increase for those citizens in the former District 3 area. f. 1. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Read Ordinance No. OCSD-18 by titre only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. 2. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-18,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-15. Directors Don Bankhead and Mark Leyes opposed. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 11 05/22/02 20. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-10, directing the County Tax Collector-Treasurer to include sanitary sewer service charges on the 2002-03 property tax bill. 21. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and 81e written communication from the City of Seal Beach re appointment of Patricia Campbell for the May 22, 2002 meeting only. 22. Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported that at the April 24, 2002 meeting, the Directors had authorized him to exercise informal bidding procedures and sole source procedures for the award of contracts for the Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Program, Job No. J-87, and also to purchase and award sole-source contracts for materials, equipment and services, as needed in an amount not to exceed$600.000 and increase sole-source authorization limits for the General Manager to$200,000 for this project only. Staffs original estimate was the disinfection of the discharge would start at the beginning of summer. However, the CEQA process will delay the disinfection process until Spring 2003. In order to speed up the process, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)is considering modification to the District's discharge permit at their July board meeting. The modification would become a mandate, and the District would need to start the disinfection process immediately, which would allow the District to begin disinfection by mid-August. Mr.Anderson stated he would need the Board to invoke a portion of the emergency provisions to speed up the bidding procedures for contractors and procurement of equipment, with the review of the Chair of the Board of Directors. Directors asked questions regarding overall cost of the project and if staff had a particular construction contractor in mind to negotiate a construction contract. It was estimated the total contract cost would be approximately$4 million, and equipment would be about 1/3 of the total construction cost, and that Mr. Anderson was requesting emergency ability to negotiate with Margate Construction, who is currently on site for another project. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Authorize the General Manager,with oversight by the Chair and Vice Chair of the Planning, Design and Constructioncommittee, to enter into purchase agreements for equipment and to bid, as necessary as an expedited procedure, for construction needed in connection with the Short-Term Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87. Director Debbie Cook opposed. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair adjourned this meeting to a special meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 19, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. The Chair then declared the meeting adjourned at 10:33 p.m. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 12 05/22/02 Secretary of t Board o !rectors.of Orange Coun Sanitati District G1wp.dlMagendaSwrd MnuteM2002 Board MinutwM2402 minutes.dw Claims Paid From 04N7/02 to 04/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor AmopM Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 43284 City of Huntington Beech 6 165,120.00 Construction-Cooperative Projects Program J-73-City of Huntingon Beach 43285 City of Santa Ana 140Z951 Construction-Cooperative Projects Program J-73-Civic Center Sewer,-Santa Ana 43286 Orange County Sanitation District 548,642.52 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 43287 Orange County Water District 513,73323 Joint GW RS Project J-36 43288 Southern California Edison 75,502.27 Power 43289 Postmaster General 99,032.04 Bulk Meiling-User Fee Increase Notifications 43290 A.B.IJV.I.P.Attorney Service 89.16 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43291 Alrgas Safety 2.329.53 Safety Supplies&Equipment 43292 Appleme Employment Service 6.335.04 Temporary Employment Services 43293 American Telephone&Telegraph Cory. 3,051.58 Long Distance Telephone Service 43294 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 93.36 Telephone Service 43295 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,629.50 Cellular Telephone Service 432% Battelle 325.00 Lab Meeting Registration 43297 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 43298 Bora logistix,L.L.C. 7.600.00 Preparation of Interim Arbitrage Rebate Report for Series 2000 COPS 43299 Boyle Engineering Corporation 394.10 Engineering Services-Develop Process Control Software Templates 43300 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 43301 California Pipeline Inspection 759.60 CCTV Sewer Inspection 43302 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 278.17 Stationery&Office Supplies 433D3 Electra-Bond 147.08 Maintenance Supplies 43304 Elliott Bay Design Group 8, 96.83 Prof.Services-Preliminary Design&Cost Analysis for Ocean Monitoring Vessel 43305 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 23,012.73 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-Feb.2002 43306 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 43307 FLW,Inc. 650.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43308 City of Huntington Beach 30.19 Water Use 43309 Industrial Metal Supply 299.49 Metal 43310 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 242.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43311 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 2,552.04 Dues Deduction 43312 Lab Suppon 3,188.00 Temporary Employment Services 43313 MarVac Electronics 68.62 Electrical Pens&Supplies 43314 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 667.18 Repairs&Maintenance Materiels 43315 Mettler-Toledo 312.50 On-Sm Training 43316 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 11,632.45 Mechanical Pans-Fabricate&Refurbish 43317 Court Order 339.50 Wage Garnishment 43318 Optio Software 7,890.00 Software Meint.,Computer Supplies&Information Technology Meeting Registration 43319 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Garnishment 43320 OCEA 422.86 Dues Deduction 43321 Pacific Bell 50.31 Telephone Services 43322 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 43323 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 43324 Peace Officers Council of CA 90D.00 Dues Deduction 43325 Printech Graphic Services,Inc. 17,782.38 Blue Mailers-Rate Increase Notifications 43326 Science Applications Intl.,Corp, 10.132.62 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 43327 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 707.28 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 4=8 Court Omer 721.50 Wage Garnishment 43329 Thompson Industrial Supply.Inc. 13.014.04 Mechanical Pane,Supplies&Maint.Materials 4333D Teksystems 1,390.00 Temporary Employment Services Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/15/02 Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description 43331 The Unisource Corporation 6,822.15 Office Supplies 43332 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 43333 Verizon California 1,535.99 Telephone Services 43334 James L Burtor 531.43 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 43335 Norman Eckenrods 153.50 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 43336 Kathleen T.Millea 1,828.87 Meeting raining Expense Reimbursement 43337 Patrick A.Sullivan 138.19 MeetingrRalning Expense Reimbursement 43338 Mark A.Tomko 1,049.26 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 43339 Yu-U Teel 607.58 Meeting/rralning Expense Reimbursement 43340 CRWOCB 500.00 Cemificalion for Bushard Trunk Sewer Encroachment 43341 Postmaster General 40,000.00 Postage-Rate Increase Notifications 43342 Archer Western Contractors,Ltd. 125,550.00 Construction-Interplant Microwave Data Trans.Project 43343 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 683,65523 Professional Sew.J-73-2 433" Blue Cross of California 228.361.96 Medical Insurance Premium 43345 Brown&Caldwell 111.610.35 Engineering Services 2-41 &Study Contract to Eval.Advanced Digestion Processes 43346 Cerollo Engineers 373.851.72 Professional Services P2-66,J-25.4&Disinfection Alternatives Research 43347 Cooper Energy Systems 38.364.57 Engine Supplies 43348 CH2M HIII 64,711.03 Professional Services J-71-4 43349 DlgTema 269,631.25 Computer Hardware/Software,Maintenance&Support 43350 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 34,719.09 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-March&April 43351 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 41,615.36 Long-Term Disability Ins.Premium 43352 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 33,753.69 Medical Insurance Premium 43353 Kemkon Pacific,Inc. 62,947.95 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 43354 Lee&Ro,Inc. 109,777.00 Professional Services P2-47-3&J-71-7 43356 Mec Analytical System 71.850.76 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis J-85 43356 Midway City Sanitary District 349.503.00 Construction-Cooperative Projects Program J-73,Midway Sanitary Dist. 43357 Mike Prlkh&Sons 169,967.69 Construction-Pacific:Coast Hwy.Form Main Repairs 43358 Munkdpal Water Dist.of Orange County 42,571.69 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99 43359 Orange County Water District 69,590.01 GAP Water Use MO 10-23.96 43360 Persons Engineering Science,Inc. 125,499.61 Engineering Services J-42 43361 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 28,904.87 Caustic Soda&Bleach 43M Sancon Engineering,Inc. 132,687.50 Diversion Gate Guides,Traffic Stop,Pipe Installation&Repairs at HB Purchase 43363 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 85,075.93 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94.P-179&J-85 43364 Southern Celff Coastal Water Research 29,000.00 Professional Services-Coastal Water Research Project 43365 Tram Consulting Engineers 25,646.00 Engineering Services P7-88 43366 Tule Ranch/Magan Fames 74.164.62 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 43367 J W Contracting Corporation 1,821,290.00 Construction P2-60 43368 Margate Construction,Inc. 960,518.00 Construction P2-39,P7-37&J-71-7 43369 Southern Contracting Company 53.694.00 Constructlon J-33-1-A 43370 Union Bank of California 180,143.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 43371 Urbantec Engineering,Inc. 268,947.00 Construction J-66 43372 Tdeu Then But,Michael F.Smith, 100,000.00 Claim Settlement Tran vs.Kovacs 43373 A-Plus Systems 4,695.72 Notices&Ads 43374 Ace Glass,Inc. 45625 Lab Paris&Supplies 43375 Adamoon Industries 515.91 Lab Supplies 43376 Air Uquide America Corp. 2,630.78 Specialty Gasses 43377 Air Products&Chemicals - 6.16 Lab Supplies 43378 Airgas Safety 8,224.53 Safety Supplies Page 2 of EXHIBIT ` Claims Paid From 04/O1/02 to 04/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43379 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 356.00 Lab Paris&Supplies 43380 Appleone Employment Service 15,537.19 Temporary Employment Services 43381 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 9,135.00 Toxicity Testing 43M Aquatic Testing Laboratories 13,500.00 Toxicity Testing 43383 Ashbrook Corporation 4,318.22 Belt Press Parts&Supplies 43384 Aflame Pool Care 260.OD Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 43385 Awards&Trophies By Bea 225.33 Plaques 43386 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 64.93 Telephone Service 43387 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 43388 AWWA 114.00 Membership-American Water Works Assoc. 43389 Ballanyne,Inc. 23,022.00 Temporary Employment Services 4339D Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 20,000.00 Telephone Equipment Service-BI-Annual Contract 43391 Bell Lend Surveying 11.326.91 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Project& 43392 StaMedeux Vitek,Inc. 933.91 Lab Parts&Supplies 43393 Son lloglatix,L.L.C. 2,0D0.00 Preparation of Final Arbitrage Rebate Report for Series'B'1990.92 COPs 43394 Boyle Engineering Corporation 3,573.66 Construction-Contract 6.13 43395 Brenntag West.Inc. 1,572.80 Janitonal Supplies 43396 Cal-Gins.Inc. 121.76 Lab Equipment Service 43397 Cattail,Inc. 1,183.40 Mechanical Pans&Supplies and Technical Support 43398 Cameron Welding Supply 57.96 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43399 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 15,974.18 Engineering Services P2-82 43400 Charles P.Crowley Co. 755.89 Instrument Pans 43401 Communications Performance Group.Inc. 12,375.00 Professional Services-Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures 43402 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 916.63 Electrical Paris&Supplies 43403 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 851.64 Plumbing Supplies 43404 Contract Environmental Service 1,495.71 Professional Services-SCAOMD Testing-Gasoline Storage Tanks 43405 Cooper Energy Services 1,241.38 Engine Supplies 43406 Corporate Express Imaging 86.46 Computer Supplies 43407 Corporate Express 698.78 Office Supplies 43408 Cost Containment Solutions 917.91 Workers Comp Services 43409 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 177.04 Mechanical Pens&Supplies 43410 Cowry Wholesale Electric Co. 1.954.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43411 Culligan of Orange County 225.00 Maim.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener Sys.&Inspection 43412 Cylec Industries 18.696.30 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798.18 43413 California Pipeline Inspection 903.50 OCTV Sewer Inspection 43414 CWEA Membership 280.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 43415 Dan Baker InExcess Awards 2,340.08 Employee Service Award Pins 43416 David's Tree Service 3,700.00 Tree Main.Service 43417 Dawson Company 263.60 Freight 43418 Do Anza Bayside Village 4.377.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 43419 Diamond H Recognition 993.30 Employee Service Awards 43420 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 34.16 Electrical Supplies 43421 Eden Equipment Company 1.944.33 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43422 Elect Air 276.19 Air Cylinders 43423 Enchanter,Inc. 4.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 43424 Environmental Resource Association 1,142.70 Lab Parts&Supplies 43425 Environmental Science Associates 11,755.30 Prof.Services J40.5 43426 Equisery 1,072.12 Mechanical Pans It Supplies Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claim Paid From 04111111/02 to 04/15/02 Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description 43427 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,038.16 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 43420 FedEx Corporation 24728 Air Freight 43429 Filarsky&Wag L.L.P. 2,422.50 Professional Services,SPMT Negotiations 43430 First Americen Real Estate Solutions 412.00 Orange County Property Information 43431 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,873.11 Lab&that.Pans&Supplies 43432 Flo-Systems,Inc. 3.120.91 Pump Supplies 43433 Foodcrafi Coffee&Refreshment Services 601.80 Meeting Supplies 43434 Forestry Suppliers 21.15 Lab Supplies 43435 Fountain Valley Camera 42.93 Photo Supplies 43436 Franklin Covey 195.17 Office Supplies 43437 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering 242.44 Paint Supplies 43438 Frys Electronics 1,889.63 Computer Supplies 43439 Full Spectrum Analytft 563.23 Instrument Service 43440 Full Spectrum Analytice,Inc. 3,200.00 Lab Instrument Service 43441 Ganall-Callahan Company 3.211.06 Chemicals 43442 Gauge Repair Service 546.78 Gauge Repair 43443 General Petroleum 3,618.97 Oil&Grease 43444 Goklenwest Fence Company 751.57 Chain Link Fencing(J-36) 43445 Graphics Press,L.L.C. 230.00 Communications Training Registration 43446 Harbour Engineering Group 236.50 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43447 Herold Primrose Ice 101.25 Ice For Samples 43448 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 84.00 Meeting Expenses 43449 The Holman Group 1.432.78 Employee Assistance Program Premium 43450 Home Depot 301.78 Small Hardware 43451 Hopkins Technical Products 223,15 Mechanical Pens&Supplies 43452 Hub Auto Supply 293.41 Truck Paris 43453 Hummingbird Communications,Ltd. 2,625.10 Software Maint. 43454 I.D.Industries,Inc. 343.61 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 43466 Idexx 5,046.00 Lab Pans&Supplies 43456 Imaging Express 189.61 Printer Maintenance 43457 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,928.37 Printing Service 43458 Industrial Distribution Group 12.242.42 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43459 Innedine Engineering 5,812-50 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 43460 Irvine Rench Water District 7.72 Water Use 43461 J.D.Edwards So.Calif.Users Group 300.00 Membership 43462 Jays Catering 1,240.12 Meeting Expenses 43463 Jensen Instrument Co. 1,383.78 Inst.Pans&Supplies 43464 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 1,350.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 43465 Karen Monaca&Associates 2,31&75 FIS Support Services 43466 Kevin Orzech 4,362.96 Prof.Services-Analysis for Physical Oceanographic Data 43467 La Quinta Inn 2,849.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 43468 Lab Support 11,724.01 Temporary Employment Services 43469 Lindsay Engineering Services 1,512.00 Professional Services-Vibration Monitoring 43470 Unjer Company eJo Gerald Jones 4,251.17 Professional Service-DART M09.22-99 43471 London Education Services 319.00 Alr Quality Training Registration 43472 Luooft 177.60 Meeting Expense 43473 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 180.00 Professional Services-Coaling Inspection of Digester Gas Storage Tank 43474 Maintenance Technology Corp. 141.75 Mechanical Supplies Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43379 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 355.00 Lab Paris&Supplies 43380 Applec ie Employment Service 15.537.19 Temporary Employment Services 43381 Aquatic Bloassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 9.136.00 Toxicity Testing 43382 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 13,500.00 Toxicity Testing 43383 Ashbrock Corporation 4,316.22 Bell Press Parts&Supplies - 43384 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 43385 Awards&Trophies By Bea 225.33 Plaques 43386 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 64.93 Telephone Service 43387 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 43M AWWA 114.00 Membership-American Water Works Assoc. 43389 Ballanyne,Inc. 23.022.00 Temporary Employment Services 43390 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 20,000.00 Telephone Equipment Service-Bi-Annual Contract 43391 Bell Land Surveying 11,326.91 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 43392 BioMeneux Vitek,Inc. 933.91 Lab Paris&Supplies 43393 eondlogistix,LL.C. 2,000.00 Preparation of Final Arbitrage Rebate Report for Series'e'1990-92 COPs 43394 Boyle Engineedng Corporation 3573.56 Construction-Contract 6-13 43395 Brenntag West,Inc. 1.572.80 Janitorial Supplies 43396 Cal-Glass,Inc. 121.76 Lab Equipment Service 43397 Callrol,Inc. 1,183.40 Mechanical Pads&Supplies and Technical Support 43398 Cameron Welting Supply 57.96 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43399 Ca6ncan Garda von Langan Engineers 15,974.18 Engineering Services P2-82 43400 Charles P.Crowley Co. 755.89 Instrument Pans 43401 Ccitmunlcations Performance,Group,Inc. 12,375.00 Professional Services-Safety&Emeg.Response Procedures 43402 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 916.53 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43403 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 951.64 Plumbing Supplies 43404 Contract Environmental Service 1.495.71 Professional Services-SCAOMD Testing-Gasoline Storage Tanks 43405 Cooper Energy Services 1,241.38 Engine Supplies 43406 Corporate Express Imaging 86.46 Computer Supplies 43407 Corporate Express 898.78 Office Supplies 43408 Oost Containment Solutions 917.91 Worker's Comp Services 43409 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 177.04 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43410 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,964.66 Electrical Pars&Supplies 43411 Culligan of Orange County 225.00 Main.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener Sys.&Inspection 43412 Cytec Industries 18,696.30 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 43413 California Pipeline Inspection 903.50 CCTV Sewer Inspection 43414 CWEA Membership 280.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 43415 Dan Baker InExcess Awards 2.340.08 Employee Service Award Pins 43416 David's Tree Semnce 3.700.00 Tree Maint.Service 43417 Dawson Company 263.60 Freight 43418 De Anza Bayside Village 4.377.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 43419 Diamond H Recognition 993.30 Employee Service Awards 43420 E.Sam Jones Distributes,Inc. 34.16 Electrical Supplies 43421 Eden Equipment Company 1.944.33 Mechanical Pars&Supplies 43422 Elect Air 276.19 Air Cylinders 43423 Enchanter,Inc. 4.000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24.95 43424 Environmental Resource Association 1,142.70 Lab Parts&Supplies 43425 Environmental Science Associates 11,755.30 Prof.Services J-40.5 43426 Equisery 1,072.12 Mechanical Pans&Supplies Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/15/02 Warant No. Vendor Amount Description 43427 ENS Resc unres,Inc. 4,036,16 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 43428 FedEx Corporation 24729 Air Freight 43429 Filarsky&Waft L.L.P. 2.42250 Professional Services,SPMT Negotiations 43430 First American Real Estate Solutions 412.00 Orange County Property Information 43431 Fisher Scientific Company,LL.C. 3,873.11 Lab&Inst.Parts&Supplies 43432 Flo-Systems,Inc. 3,120.91 Pump Supplies 43433 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 601.80 Meeting Supplies 43434 Forestry Suppliers 21.16 Lab Supplies 43435 Fountain Valley Camera 42.93 Photo Supplies 43436 Franklin Covey 195.17 Office Supplies 43437 Frazee Paint and Wellcovering 242.44 Paint Supplies 43438 Frys Electronics 1,869.53 Computer Supplies 43439 Full Spectrum Anelytics 563.23 Instrument Service 43440 Full Spectrum Analyties,Inc. 3,200.00 Lab Instrument Service 43441 Garraft-Callahan Company 3,211.06 Chemicals 43442 Gauge Repair Service 546.78 Gauge Repair 43443 General Petroleum 3.618.97 Oil&Grease 0444 Goldenwest Fence Company 761.57 Chain Link Fencing(J-36) 43445 Graphics Press.L.L.C. 230.00 Communications Training Registration 43446 Harbour Engineering Group 236.50 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43447 Harold Primrose Ice 10125 Ice For Samples 43448 Herb's Bleckforest Bakery&Deli 84.00 Meeting Expenses 43449 The Holman Group 1,432.78 Employee Assislance Program Premium 43450 Home Depot 301.78 Small Hardware 43451 Hopkins Technical Products 223.15 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43452 Hub Auto Supply 293.41 Truck Paris 43453 Hummingbird Communicatons,Ltd. 2.625.10 Software Main. 43464 I.D. Industries,Inc. 343,61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43455 Idexz 5,045.00 Lab Paris&Supplies 43456 Imaging Express 189.61 Printer Maintenance 43457 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,928.37 Printing Service 43458 Industrial Distribution Group 12,242.42 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 43459 Innedine Engineering 5,812.50 CCTV Videoing of Tmnkline Sewers 43460 Irvine Ranch Water District 7.72 Water Use 43461 J.D.Edwards So.Calif.Users Group 300.00 Membership 43462 Jay's Catering 1,240.12 Meeting Expenses 43463 Jansen Instrument Co. 1,363.78 Inst.Pans&Supplies 43464 K.P.Undstrom,Inc. 1,350.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 43465 Karen Monaco&Associates 2,318.75 FIS Support Servkas 43466 Kevin Oaech 4,362.96 Prof.Services-Analysis for Physical Oceanographic Data 43467 La Quints Inn 2.849.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 43468 Lab Support 11,724.01 Temporary Employment Services 43469 Undsay Engineering Services 1.512.00 Professional Services-Vibration Monitoring 43470 Unjer Company do Gerald Jones 4,251.17 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 43471 Lorman Education Services 319.00 Air Quality Training Registration 43472 Luccl's 177.50 Meeting Expense 43473 M.J.Schiff&Assoclatea,Inc. 180.00 Professional Services-Coaling Inspection of Digester Gas Storage Tank 43474 Maintenance Technology Corp. 141.75 Mechanical Supplies Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/1&02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43475 Management Technologies 3,525.00 Prof.Sam.-Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit Project Support 43476 Manatt,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 15,000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 43477 MarVac Electronics 161.63 Electrical Pads&Supplies 43478 The Mathworks,Inc. 1,052.33 Software Maintenance 43479 Matt Chlor,Inc. 9.82 Valves 43480 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 743.03 Mechanical Pane&Supplies 43481 Media Clips,Inc. 35.00 Notices&Ads 43482 Medlin Controls Co. 385.44 Instrument Supplies 43483 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 11,480.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43484 Mlaalon Uniform Service 3,795.47 Uniform Rentals 43485 Morton Salt 598.73 Sall 43486 Municipal Equipment Maintenance Assoc. 50,D0 Membership 43487 MBC Applied Environmental Sciences 1,420.00 Lab Analyses 43488 MOB Consulting 8,985.00 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 43489 MGD Technologies,Inc. 10.200.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 43490 National Business Womens Leadership Assoc. 680.00 Engineering Training Registration 43491 National Fire Protection Association 39.52 Publication 43492 National Microcomp Services 1.212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 43493 National Plant Services,Inc. 2,550.00 Vacuum Truck Services 43494 Newark Electronics 233.14 Electrical Pans&Supplies 43495 Ntokey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 7,720.77 Diesel Fuel 43496 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 2.681.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 43497 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,059.22 Office Supplies 43498 Orange County Health Care Agency 9,900.00 2002 Hazardous Waste&Hazardous Material Fees 43499 Orange Fluid System Tech.,Inc. 983.00 Fittings 43500 Ortiz Fire Protection 416.00 Service Agreement-Testing&Codification of All Fire Sprinkler Systems at Pits 1&2 43501 Oxygen Service Company 1,288.81 Specialty Gases 43502 008 Reprographics 166.96 Printing Service-MO 1/26= 43503 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 24,911.46 Annual Agreement for Air Filter Media&Related Services 43504 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 43505 Pacific Pane&Controls 2,699.80 Electrical Paris&Supplies 43508 Parker Morton&Controls Sales 79.49 Mechanical Supplies 43507 Parker Supply Company 516.36 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43508 Parts Unlimited 482.60 Truck Supplies 43509 Pickens Fuel Corp. 580.01 ONG Program Operational&Maintenance Services 43510 Pilkington Aerospace 3,272.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 43511 Polydyne,Inc. 13,063.75 Cationic:Polymer MO3-11-92 43512 Pod Supply 231.39 Foul Weather Gear for Ocean Monitoring Crew 43513 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 1,046.60 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 43514 Prestige Striping Services,Inc. 1.735.00 Pavement Striping-Traffic Control 43515 Primary Source 9,182.08 Office Furniture 43516 Process Equipment Company 3,093.50 Pump&Pump Supplies 43517 Projects Partners 23.881.69 Temporary Employment Services 43518 Property Damage Appraisers 76.00 Vehicle Damage Appraiser Service 43519 Pulzmelsler 43.62 Pump Services 43520 PCS Express 440.00 Courier Service 43521 DOS,L.L.C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service 43522 R.Fox Construcgon,Inc. 1,902.46 Construction-Reroute Gas Line,Install Valves/Fittings at Rebuild Shop Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04101A2 to 04/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43523 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Korn County Blosolids Consulting Services 43524 Radius Maps 225.00 Update Property Owner Address Listings(1.2.4) 43525 Ratnin Instrument Co.,Inc. 499.15 tab Supplies 43626 Red Wing Shoes 101.29 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 43527 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ina. 8,503.88 Life Insurance Premium 43528 Rotor Rooter 1,492.66 Repair Shower Drains at Pit.2 Maintenance Building 43529 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 74.25 Pump Supplies 43530 RPM Electric Motors 1.960.14 Motors&Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43531 Safety-Kleen 423.06 Pens Cleaning Service 43532 Saybolt L.P. 600.00 Air Analyses 43533 Seers Industrial Sales 94.89 Mechanical Supplies 43534 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 39.96 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43535 Sigma Chemical Co. 3,661.74 Lab Parts&Supplies 43536 Skater,Inc. 769.49 Lab Parts&Supplies 43537 SkillPam Seminars 199.00 Information Technology Training Registration 43538 So.Cal.Gas Company 3.797.79 Natural Gas 43539 South Coast Environmental Co. 89321 Gen Gen Emissions Testing Service 43540 Southern California Edison 7.355.13 Power 43541 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 622.41 Instrument Repairs 43542 Strategic Diagnostics,Inc. 1,202.51 Lab Parts&Supplies 43543 Straughan Technical Distribution L.L.C. 625.27 Pump Pans&Supplies 43544 Sunset Industrial Paris 380.75 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43545 SKC-Weal,Inc. 1,148.24 Safety Supplies 43546 SM Protective Coaling 2.750.00 Manhole Grading&Coaling 43547 STL Sacramento 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 43548 Tesew,Inc. 6.788.10 Valves 43549 Temtlnix International Go. 450.00 Pest Control 43560 The Orange County Register 561.72 Notices&Ads 43551 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 48.23 Mechanical Supplies 43552 Deily Pilot 288.75 Notices&Ads 43553 Tanya Look&Safe Service&Sales 163.79 Locks&Keys 43564 Tow ba Iniematlonal Corporation 241.90 Electrical Supplies 43555 Tranecal 1,528.82 Instrument Supplies 43556 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 12,771.61 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11.94 43557 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 232.33 Truck Supplies 43558 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,130.00 Lab Services 43559 Teksystems 12,198.00 Temporary Employment Services 43560 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,282.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 43561 Ultra Scientific 217.35 Lab Supplies 43562 United Parcel Service 40.40 Parcel Services 43563 USFEter Westates Carbon 1,971.83 Fibers 43564 Valley Cllles Supply Company 226.02 Water Heater 435M The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 11,600.00 Temporary Employment Service 43566 Verizon California 1.437.81 Telephone Services 43567 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 24,070.50 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 43588 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 1.488.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 43569 The Wackenhut Corporation 9.052.44 Security Guards 43570 Wavle Markets Corp. 21,837.30 Malnt.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Marl.Removal Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/16/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43571 IMRI 14,300.00 Temporary Employment Services 43672 Weethay Solutions Group 1,650.00 Information Technology Training Registration 43573 Western Switches&Controls,Inc. 358.71 Electrical Supplies 43574 WEF 427.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 43575 Xerox Corporation 213,87 Fax&Copier Losses 43576 The Yakima Company 24,751.18 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 43577 YSl Massachusetts 3,719.57 (2)Meters 43578 California Bank&Trust 5,966.00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention 43579 MVP Commercial,Inc. 9,372.00 Constmcllon-Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services.Retention 43580 Olason Consuuclion,Inc. 13,444.00 Construction-Control Panel&Piping Modifications,Retention 43581 Punchllst Contractors 17,730.00 Construction-Purchasing Conference Room at Pit.1 43582 R.Fox Conslnsxion,Inc. 12,574.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Plt.1 43583 Laurie S.Bluestein 708.16 MeetingTralning Expense Reimbursement 43584 William D.Cassidy 498.13 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43585 Martin G.England 1.750.00 Meeting?relning Expense Reimbursement 43586 Robert P.Ghirelli 1.078.76 Meeting/Rreining Expense Reimbursement 43587 David R.Heinz 112.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 435M Charles G.Lee 316.02 Meeting/tralning Expense Reimbursement 43589 Ddaze Phuang 129.43 Meeting/ ralning Expense Reimbursement 43590 Douglas M.Stewart 325.99 Meating7ralning Expense Reimbursement 43591 Jonathan K.Thomsic 263.38 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43592 City of Anaheim 5,088.00 Permit&Inspection Fees for Installation of 19 Flow Meters 43593 City of Fullerton 2,031.00 Permit&Inspection Fees for Installation of 9 Flow Meters 43594 Employee Activity Committee 755.00 Service Award Expense 43595 Jesus Baez&Dell Computer 1,167.82 Employee Computer Loan Program 43596 Orange County Sanitation District 15.658.04 Workers Comp.Relmb. 43597 Orange County Sanitation Distinct 1,366.33 Petry Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 9,053,777.76 Payroll Disbursements 26285-26413 Employee Paychecks $ 167,038.21 Biweekly Payroll 04/0302 26414-26416 Interim Paychecks 5,570.79 Termination Paychecks,Directors Paycheck,Reissue Stale Dated Check 71345-71803 Direct Deposit Statements 768,624.74 Biweekly Payroll 06/03(02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 941,133.74 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 118,967.14 %mete Generale March Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Parlicipa0on Chase Bank of Texas 45,250.82 March Interest Payment on Sena 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 164217.96 Total Claims Paid 04101102-04/15/02 $ 10,159,129.46 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 43598 American Express $ 39,980.14 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 43599 Mika Prlich&Sons 172,378.63 Construction-Farce Main Repairs at Bitter Point Pump Station 43600 Orange County Sanitation District 465,893.26 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 43601 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 37,098.50 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 43602 Vapex,Inc. 575,080.00 (28)Vapex Scrubber Monitor/Controllers 43603 Alrgas Safety 120.15 Safety Supplies 43604 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 16.75 Telephone Service 43605 Court Omer 626.20 Wage Garnishment 43606 Boutwell,Fay&Fabricant,LL.P. 1,412.10 Legal Services-401a Plan 43607 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 43608 Compressor Components Of California 1.745.55 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43609 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 150.82 Electrical Supplies 43610 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,781.02 Plumbing Supplies 43611 County of Orange,Auditor Controller 420.00 Environmental Health Services Re Newport Sewerline Failure on 2-21-01 43612 CASA 300.00 Communications Meeting Registration 43613 OWEA Membership 140.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 43614 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 12,184.32 Server Maintenance 43615 DSS Solutions,Corp 19,600.00 Business Objects Training 43616 Electra-Test,Inc. 23,760.00 Maintenance Services-(5)Portable Generators at Pit.2 43617 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 43618 FTI,Inc. 315.52 Printed Farms-W2's&Envelopes 43619 Richard Goode 80.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43620 Robert or Janice Hanson 554.21 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43621 Industrial Metal Supply 2.899.92 Metal 43622 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 2.537.73 Dues Deduction 43623 ISSA Headquarters 180.00 Membership-Information Systems Security Association 43624 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 13,912.57 Environmental Consulting Services NO 12-9-90 43625 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 4a2.07 Door Repair 43626 Albert or Keely Ann Medina 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43627 Court Omer 339.50 Wage Garnishment 43628 National Plant Services,Inc. 6,480.00 Vacuum Truck Services 43629 Network Associates 188.33 Software Maintenance-Magic 43630 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Garnishment 43631 OCEA 413.61 Dues Deduction 43632 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 43633 Court Omer 296.00 Wage Garnishment 43634 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction 43635 Pod Supply 242.22 Safety Supplies 43636 Mr.George Pulliam 1.034.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43637 Llese Rego 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43638 George L.Robertson 132.57 Meetingrrralning Expense Reimbursement 43639 Rutan&Tucker,L.L.P. 97.67 Legal Services-Crow-Wimmrop Development 43640 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 367.25 Hand Cleaner 43641 Eric or Stephanie Simon 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43642 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 43643 So.Cal.Gas Company 9,782.79 Natural Gas 43644 Southern California Edison 1,829.44 Power Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43645 Voided Check - - 43646 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 264.06 Mechanical Supplies 43647 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 43648 Vedzon California 3,621.34 Telephone Services 43649 Voided Check - - 43650 Nicholas J.Amontes 286.27 MeetinWTmining Expense Reimbursement 43651 Kelly J.Christensen 200.37 Meetfng/fraining Expense Reimbursement 43652 Steven R.DeWilde 149.25 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 43653 David R.Heinz 760.62 Mee6ngri mining Expense Reimbursement 43654 Miriam Loyo 1,171.51 Meetingrrralning Expense Reimbursement 43655 Canh O.Nguyen 1,212.09 Mesting/freining Expense Reimbursement 43656 Brian K.Reed 1.294.28 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43657 Simon L.Watson 163.00 Meeting/freining Expense Reimbursement 43658 Paula A.Zeller 998.81 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 43659 State Water Resources Control Board 250.00 Permit Fee-Notice of Intent 1.24 436M Air Products&Chemicals 25,045.99 O&M Agreement Cary Gen Sys MO 8-8.89 43661 Boyle Engineering Corporation 159,104.31 Engineering Services 1-24 43662 BP Energy Company 106,593.95 Natural Gas 43663 Carollo Engineers 34,416.25 Professional Services-Microfiltration Demonstration Project 43664 Carolfo Engineers 56,847.41 Engineering Services-P1-71 &Treatment Processes Study 43665 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 169,834.20 Computers-(75)Dell Optlplex&(2)Dell Precision 43666 Kemiron Pacific.Ix. 70,563.36 Ferric:Chloride MO 9.27-95 43667 Matrix Service Corp. 68,450.40 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Low Pressure Gas Holder at Pit.2 43668 Mike Prlkh&Sons 104.748.03 Construction-Force Mein Repairs at Bitter Point Pump Station 43689 Ondeo Degremont,Inc. 96,234.40 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Headworks Improvements&Retention 43670 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 62,714.00 Manhole Rehabilitation and Street Repairs 43671 Polydyne.Inc. 53,944.83 Cationic Polymer NO 3-11-92 43672 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 29.749.83 Sewedine Cleaning 43673 Southern California Edison 96,015.67 Power 43574 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 60,586.68 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 43675 SPEC Services,Inc. 28,870.31 Engineering Services J-33-1 43676 Tule RancluMagan Farms 74,790.40 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 43677 U.S.Metro Group,Inc. 89,9/0.24 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance Services at PI1s. 1 &2 43678 Undersea Graphics,Inc. 40,000.00 Contract Service-Outiall Inspection 43679 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 32,635.94 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 43680 W0odm6,Spradfin&Smart 101.378.82 Legal Services NO 7.26-95 43681 The Yakima Company 51,88921 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 43682 Ark Construction Company 76,482.00 Construction PI-62 43683 Ace Glass,Inc. 88.19 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 43684 Acoustical Material Services 209.13 Ceiling Tile 43605 Adamson Industries 1,547.72 Lab Supplies 43686 Great American Printing Co. 123.84 Stationery&Office Supplies 43687 Advanced Cooling Technologies 420.00 Air Conditioning Service 43688 Advanced Power&Controls.L.L.C. 12,743.81 Electrical Pump Control Panel 43689 Aearo Company 428.50 Safety Supplies 43690 Airborne Express 136.18 Air Freight 43691 Alrgas Safety 4,475.67 Safety Supplies 43692 Alfa-Robbins,Inc. 56.87 Instrument Supplies Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43693 American Airlines 8,754.80 Travel Services 43694 American Training Resources,Inc. 429.50 Video 43695 Ametek Rotron 5.325.45 (2)Vac Fans 43696 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 13,500.00 Toxicity Testing 43697 Arch Wireless 2,775.40 Pagers,Service&Airtime 43698 Asbury Environmental Services 395.00 Waste OR Removal 43699 Aspen Publishers,Inc. 63.49 Publication 43700 Atkinson-Baker,Inc. 214.25 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43701 Automatic Timing&Controls 428.08 Repairs&Maintenance Services 43702 AMSA 675.00 Technical Services Meeting Registragon 43703 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 670.72 Telephone Service 43704 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 208.33 Telephone Service 43705 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 63.21 Cellular Telephone Service 43705 Bellantyne,Inc. 3,828.00 Temporary Employment Services 43707 Basler Electric Company 1.480.59 Electrical Supplies 43708 Battery Specialties 1.672.62 Batteries 43709 Bell Land Surveying 10.725.00 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 43710 Bently Nevada Corporation 574.31 Instrument Parts&Supplies 43711 Bermingham Controls 512.64 Valves 43712 BormvAck,Guy,Benenhausen 1,053.03 Professional Services-P2.84 43713 Brian A.Eviald,M.D.,Inc. 1,649.50 Professional Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43714 Brown&Caldwell 18.653.47 Engineering Services-J-25-6 43715 Calffomia Relocation Services,Inc. 253.12 Office Moving Services 43716 Soulhem California Marine Institute 12,430.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 43717 Callrol,Inc. 1,403.98 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43718 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 2,083.33 Professional Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 43719 Capitol Enquiry,Inc. 120.37 Publication 43720 Carl Warren&Go. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 43721 Cathcart Garcia van Langan Engineers 8,158.50 Engineering Services-Design Mixing System for Anaerobic Selector Study 43722 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 2.220.48 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 43723 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 12,376.00 Professional Services-Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures 43724 Voided Check - - 43725 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2.736.02 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43726 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,617.44 Plumbing Supplies 43727 Cooper Energy Services 4,364.13 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 43728 Cooper Energy Systems 10,047.27 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43729 Coordinated Wire Rope&Rigging 1,482.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43730 Corporate Express 1,351.61 Office Supplies 43731 Cost Containment Solutions 943.85 Workees Camp.Services 43732 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2,295.88 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43733 Cummins Allison Corp. 983.24 Accounting Equipment Melnt.Agreement 43734 Cyclus Envlrosystems,Inc. 7,142.61 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 43736 CA Emissions Program 22.20 Vehicle Electronic Transmission Services 43736 CWEA Membership 70.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 43737 Dapper Tire Go. 266.82 Truck Tires 43738 Del Mar Analytical 3,488.00 Btosolids Analysis 43739 Manors nian Dun 1.034.02 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43740 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 1,158.97 Electrical Supplies Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43741 E.O.Heller's Son,Inc. 58.47 Electrical Supplies 43742 Eberline Instruments 416.56 Instrument Maim. 43743 Ecology Control Industries 4,170.86 Hazardous Waste Disposal 43744 Ed Ruzek&Associates,Inc. 2,306.25 Legal Services-Claim of Tum vs.Kovacs 43745 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 2,852.00 Medical Screening 43746 Electra-Bond 23,424.85 Belt Press Rollers Recoaling 43747 Elliott Bay Design Group 4,275.45 Prof.Services-Preliminary Design&Cost Analyses for Ocean Monitoring Vessel 43748 Enchanter,Inc. 4,000.00 Ocean Monitoring NO 5.24-95 43749 Enecon Corporation 710.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43750 Environmental Engineering&contracting 10,000.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 43751 Environmental Resource Center 399.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 43752 Exterminetks of Southern California 1,300.00 Pest Control 43753 EFA Inc. 3,958.50 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43754 FedEx Corporation 199.95 Air Freight 43755 Filarsky&Waft,L.L.P. 1,852.60 Professional Services,SPMT Negotiations 43756 Filler Supply Company 2,533.78 Filters 43757 First American Real Estate Solutions 259.15 Orange County Property Information 43758 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 7.275.36 Lab Parts&Supplies 43759 Flo-Systems,Inc. 2.954.21 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43760 Forestry Suppliers 319.39 Lab Supplies 43761 Foss Environmental 4,469.00 Caustic Tank Cleaning 43762 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 461.60 Truck Wash Tickets 43763 Franklin Covey 36.19 Office Supplies 43764 Fys Electronics 30624 Computer Supplies 43765 Gamin-Callahan Company 54.30 Lab Pads&Supplies 43766 General Peaoleum 13,669.57 Unleaded Gasoline 43767 George Yardley Co. 69.36 Lab Supplies 43768 Gerry Aster,R.N.,M.S.,C.R.C. 1,025.63 Consulting Services-Claim of Tran vs.Kovacs 43769 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 1,162.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43770 Gold Systems,Inc. 3,726.25 Professional Services-Data Migration&STORET Interface Application 43771 Goidenwast Fence Company 630.00 Chain Link Fencing-Pit. 1 43T72 Goldenwest Window Service 2,742.00 Window Geening Service-Spec.e990015 43773 W W Grainger,Inc. 2,603.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43774 Graybar 130.69 Freight Charges 43775 H F Scientific 177.42 Chemicals 43776 Hanker Equipment Company 1,474.85 Truck Repairs,Pans&Supplies 43777 Hach do PonWn Industries 1,190.47 Ins.Parts&Supplies 43778 Hatch It Kirk,Inc. 7,331.14 Engine Generator Control Supplies 43779 Herb's Blacklorest Bakery&Def 152.00 Meeting Expenses 43780 Home Depot 378.59 Small Hardware 43781 Hopkins Technical Products 6,869.83 Pumps&Pump Supplies 43782 C.Cowles&Co. 187.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43783 Imaging Express 166.49 Printer Mainlenance 43784 Industrial Distribution Group 1,460.11 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43785 Industrial Metal Supply 632.92 Metal 43786 Innerline Engineering 410.00 Professional Services-CCTV Vkieoing of Tnmklines 43787 Inieq Group 1.295.00 Source Control Training Registration 4378E Intratek Computer,Inc. 1,411.20 Network&Server Mainlenance Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43789 tonics Instrument Business Group 2,083.02 Lab Maintenance Services 43790 Iron Mountain 311.33 Storage Fee-Engineering Documents 43791 Irvine Ranch Water District 50.32 Water Use 43792 IABC 201.37 Publication 43793 IBM Corp. 2,417.79 IBM AS1400 Lease 43794 Associated Readymlx Concrete 529.23 Concrete 43795 IONIA,Inc. 268.95 Subscription 43796 ITG Tech 9.480.00 Professional Services-Help Desk Administration 43797 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 4.087.77 Specially Gases 43798 J.L.Wingert Company 2,764.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43799 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 4,050.29 Professional Services-Collection System Gas Flaps 43800 Jays Catering 376.08 Meeting Expenses 43801 Jensen Instrument Do. 1,080.86 Electrical Paris&Supplies 43802 K.P.Lindstrom.Inc. 6,960.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12.9-90 43803 Kelly Paper 102.15 Paper 43804 Kindness General Contractors,Inc. 3,625.00 Construction-Concrete Foundation Rebuild Shop 43805 Kuser&Hands 259.10 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovsee 43806 KOCE-Real Orange 23.06 Video 43807 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 102.38 Safety Supplies 43008 Law Offices of Kinkle,Rodiger&Spriggs 14,112.19 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43809 Law/Crandall 701.00 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182 43810 Lifecom-Safety,Inc. 3.760.48 Ins.Parts&Supplies 43811 Linter Company clo Gerald Jones 4,213.94 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 43812 Luccl's $1.25 Meeting Expense 43813 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 2,207.05 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 43814 Management Technologies 6.675.00 Professional Services-Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit 43815 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 688.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43816 MCRay Industries,Inc. 1,813.23 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43817 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 130.00 Ins.Pans&Supplies 43818 Med-Tox,Inc. 275.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 43819 Media Clips,Inc. 111.00 Notices 438M Medlin Controls Co. 1,564.23 Instrument Supplies 43821 Metal Finishing 68.00 Subscription 43822 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 6,908.22 Mechanical Pans,Supplies It Repairs 43823 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 130.11 Window 43824 Mission Uniform Service 4,441.08 Uniform Rentals 43825 Mitchell Instrument Co. 767.10 Ins.Pans&Supplies 43826 MCR Technologies,Inc. 1,642.87 Ins.Parts&Supplies 43827 MGD Technologies,Inc. 18.100.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 43828 MISCO Southwest 467.21 Pump 43829 Neal Supply Co. 1.477.47 Plumbing Supplies 43830 NetVersant of Soulhem California 19,327.90 Human Resources Security System Improvements 43831 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 1S0.D0 O&M Training Registration 43832 Newark Electronics 739.98 Electrical Supplies 43833 Nicholas Chevrolet 24,355.59 (1)20D2 Utility Truck 43834 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 61.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-9B 43835 The Norco Companies. 156.00 Mall Delivery Service 438W Nu-Way Laser Engraving 125.86 Traffic Regulation Sign Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43837 NAB Associates,Inc. 1,495.00 Lab Services 43838 Office Depot Business Services Div. t188.94 Office Supplies 43839 Oxygen Service Company 460.54 Specialty Gases 43840 OCB Reprographics 3,933.54 Printing Service-MO 126/00 43841 OCE-USA,Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 43842 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 450.91 Filters 43843 Pacific Bell 851.58 Telephone Services 43844 Pacific Mechanical Systems 1,024.66 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies 43845 Pacific Parts 8 Controls 4,238.93 Computer Herdware/Softwere 6 Electrical Supplies 43846 Pacific Stales Chemical,Inc. 1,787.63 Muriatic Acid 43847 Parker Supply Company 1,054.26 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 43848 Pearpoint,Inc. 8,113.58 (1)Pearpoint P372 Camera System w/Monitor-Sewerline Inspection Equipment 43849 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 12,652.45 Sodium Hypochlorite 438N Power Design 9,546.65 Electrical Supplies 43851 Power Systems Testing 4,700.00 Electrical Equipment 43852 Power Bros.Machine.Inc. 335.00 Mechanical Malnt. 43853 Praxalr,Inc. 9.87 Lab Supplies 43854 Prestige Striping Services,Inc. 990.00 Striping-Construction Management Parking Lot 43a55 Primary Source 6,088.59 Office Furniture 43856 Projects Partners 21.363.40 Temporary Employment Services 43857 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 795.42 Pump Supplies 43858 Pulzmeater 1,527.98 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies 43859 OOS.L.L.C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service 43860 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,289.70 Trash Removal 43861 Resents Systems Corporation 21,59375 Professional Services-Supervisory Control 8 Data Aoqushion Software Upgrade 43862 Roto Rooter 475.41 Drain Repairs 43863 Ryan Heroo Products Corp. 400.94 Mechanical Paris 8 Supplies 43864 Republic Engines 310.02 Motor 43865 RMS Engineering 6 Design,Inc. 4,700.00 Prof.Sam.-Design Removable Vault Screens for Headworks Metering Facility 43866 RPM Electric Motors 3,208.88 Electrical Pads,Supplies 6 Repairs 43867 Saferyxare,Inc. 210.11 Video 43868 Scmvmg America,Inc. 4,908.68 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 43869 Schwing America,Inc.-Training 975.00 Mechanical Maintenance Training Registration 43870 Science Applications lnti.Corp. 7.194.75 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8.94 43871 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 36.44 Lab Parts S Supplies 43872 Sewer Equipment Company of America 308.83 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 43873 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 95.02 Hand Cleaner 43374 Shepherd Machinery Co. 287.47 Mechanical Pads 8 Supplies 43875 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 3,460.82 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 43876 Aldrich Chemical Co. 293.29 tab Supplies 43817 Sign-a-Rama 969.76 Printing 43878 SkillPath Seminars 99.00 Lab Training Registration 43879 Southern California Edison 28.12 Power 43880 Sperling Inst.c/o Patten Corporate 2,516.01 (1)Row Meter 43881 Spex Cediprep.Inc. 234.88 Lab Supplies 43882 Spherion Corporation 1,959.37 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43883 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 235.32 Office Supplies 43884 Sunset Industrial Pads 1,411.12 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vander Amount Description 43885 Super Chem Corporation 487.63 Chemicals 43886 Thermo Elemental 333.85 Lab Parts&Supplies 43887 Osprey Marne Management 1,050.00 Lab Services 438M Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,365.34 Mechanical Supplies 43889 Train Consulting Engineers 4.564.56 Engineering Services Pl-88 43800 The Trans Company 91.72 Electrical Supplies 43891 Tropical Plus Nursery,Inc. 57.53 Contract Groundskesping MO 5.11-94 43892 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 138.18 Truck Supplies 43893 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 50.00 Lab Services 43894 Tuff Shed,Inc. 1.500.00 Relocation of Storage Shed 43095 Tuthill Energy Systems(Ventilation 4,380.70 Ventilation Pads&Supplies 43896 TCH Associates,Inc. 1,969.18 Lab Supplies 43897 Teksystems 2,199.00 Temporary Employment Services 4389E U.S.Filter Corporation 300.00 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 43899 U.S.Peroxide 16,890.24 Prof.Services-Collection Sys.Odor&Codoslon Chemical Add.Demo.Study 43900 Union Bank of California 3,717.15 Banking Services 43901 United Parcel Service 1,657.10 Parcel Services 43902 Navel Post Graduate School 11,617.25 Professional Services J-85 43903 Universal Specialties,Inc. 392.22 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43904 UC Regents 595.00 Safely&Emergency Response Training Registration 43M UCI Regents 19,30180 Professional Services J-85 43908 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 55.30 Filters 43907 Velco Instruments Co.,Inc. 134.19 Lab Supplies 43908 Vellen Safety Supply Company 50228 Safety Supplies 43909 Valley Clues Supply Company 559.65 Mechanical Pens&Supplies 43910 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 8,400.00 Temporary Employment Service 43911 Vapex,Inc. 23,945.00 (1)Sentinel Bask:Una,Sensor&Pump 43912 Varian Associates,Inc. 77.80 Lab Supplies 43913 Vector 562.50 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43914 Vector Scientific 11,653.30 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43916 Vedzon California 862.71 Telephone Services 43916 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,365.24 Vision Service Premium 43917 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 5,282.27 Lab Parts&Supplies 43918 The Wackenhut Corporation 13,170.21) Security Guards 43919 Waste Markets Corp. 10,773.05 Malnt.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mail.Removal 43920 Waters Corporation 4.878.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 43921 Waxle Sanitary Supply 53.79 Janitorial Supplies 43922 Western Switches&Controls,Inc. 17,222.14 Electrical Parts&Supplies-Headworks Fans 43923 WEF 296.00 Membership.Water Environment Federation 43924 W RM 2002 090.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration 43925 Xerox Corporation 10,110.58 Copier&Four Lewes 43926 Mike Prllch&Sons 13.424.68 Construction-Junction Structure Upgrade 43927 Punchlisl Contractors 17,730.00 Construction-Purchasing Bldg.Card.Roan,Ph.1 43928 Gerardo Amezcua 575.59 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43929 Catherine M.State 769.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43930 Thomas M.Stands, 700.6E Meeting?ralning Expense Reimbursement Q931 Peter H.Brown 269.75 Meeting/rmining Expense Reimbursement 43932 Jennifer M.Cabral 119.13 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Palo From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43933 George A.ChareBe 664.82 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 43934 Peter Chaffs 555.83 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 43935 Kelly J.Christensen 710.09 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43936 Thomas D.Dodderer 564.83 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43937 Timothy D.Foley 338.91 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43938 John G.Gonzalez 446.32 Me atingrrralning Expense Reimbursement 43939 Curt V.Shelp 585.50 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 43940 Dale E.Sparks 409.98 MeatinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 43941 Joseph F.Vallone 465.83 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 43942 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 255.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 43M JAMS/ENDISPIJTE 50.00 Legal Services-Train vs.Kovacs 43944 Orange County Sanitation District 53821 Petry Cash Reimb. 43945 Robed C.Thompson 1,476.93 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,910,328.67 Pewsll Disbursements 26417-26524 Employee Paychecks $ 100,279.11 Biweekly Payroll 04117102 26628-26628 Interim Paycheck 2,022.64 Termination Paycheck 71804-72260 Direct Deposit Stalemeras 799,646.90 Bhveekly,Payroll 04/17/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 961,948.65 Wire Transfer Pavments Slate Street Bank 6 Trust Co.of CA $ 40,814.38 April Interest Payment on Series 2000 A 8 B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments It 40,814. 68 Total Claims Paid 04/16/02-04/30102 $ 4,912,991.68 Page 8 of a EXHIBIT B BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mretlng pate To 6tl 61''2'r. O6/26/02 AGENDA REPORT rrem Number Item Number 6 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Nominations and election of Chair(effective July 1, 2002) (2) Nominations and election of Vice Chair(effective July 1, 2002) SUMMARY As provided in the Board's Rules of Procedure, nominations and election of the Chair shall take place at the June regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Chair will be conducted immediately following the election of the Chair. For the Directors information, included below is an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedure relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District: "Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board. A Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board shall be elected by a majority vote of Directors at the regular meeting in June of each year, and will assume office July 1st. The nominations for Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in May of each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement setting forth their qualifications for the office of Chairperson. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Board of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the June regular meeting. The nominations and election for Vice Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Chairperson. The elected Vice Chairperson will assume office July 1st. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Chairperson becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairperson shall automatically G�"aaagendummngme.�a WAgugr ngmramaneme.ueam.m R.1 eed arzgree Page 1 succeed to the office of the Chairperson and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Vice Chairperson becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Directors. Subject to the provisions about serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors, the Chairperson shall not serve more than two consecutive one- year terms for which he/she has been elected to the office of Chairperson." PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CECA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A G:My.Ela�lBpO,d Ag NeeNY12W3 BovE lgm PepvbNWNen Beau d= e,,W: a2o9e Page 2 BRIAN J . 13RADY IN ASSOCIATgS 16712 MACANTMUR BOULEVARD SUITE 120 IRVINQ. 6A 02612 June 20, 2002 Members of the Board Orange County Sanitation District 10944 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Board Members: As you know, I am a candidate for the chairmanship of the Sanitation District Board, and respectfully seek your support and your vole on June 26, 20D2. Last night's Board meeting provided us with a wealth of technical and economic information. Kudos to Blake and staff for a comprehensive presentation. Now it is up to us, as Board Members, to develop a concensus solution. I ask that you consider my technical background and experience Within the industry as you determine the leadership needed during this crucial period. I am prepared to devote the time, energy and attention necessary to advocate our shared vision, in Orange County and Sacramento. Please plan to attend our meeting an June 26th and support my candidacy for chairman. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me at (949)752-1352. Vary truly yours, Brian J. Bradv. P.E. PHONE: 949.752.1302 • FAN: 949.762.6922 EMAIL: YJRw9a OOlATQ9®ppCy{.e6wL.N6Y 1 Meeting Date To 8d.of Dir. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 06/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 0 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CECIA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 05/01/02— 05/15/02 and 05/16/02— 05/31/02 R ' Claims Paid From OSM1/02 to OSM5/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 43946 Delta Dental $ SZ648.35 Dental Insurance Plan 43947 Orange County Sanitation District 454,364.35 Payroll EFT RelmIctimment 43948 Southern California Edison 63.012.72 Power 43949 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 40,443.40 Construction-2-41-2 43950 Abesco 89.48 Hardware 43951 Airgas Safety 1,412.28 Safely Supplies 43952 American Airlines 7,316.67 Travel Services 43953 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,304.28 Long Distance Telephone Service 43954 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 19.59 Telephone Service 43955 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,888.42 Cellular Telephone Service 43956 AT&T Wireless Services 3,075.78 Cellular Telephone Service 43957 Beach Cities Scuba Center 150.00 Hydrolesl SCBA Bottles 43958 Bentley Systems,Inc. 1,259.82 Software Maintenance Agreement 43959 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 43960 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 43961 CompuMaster On-site 12,750.00 On-Site Training 43962 Consdidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 805.83 Electrical Supplies 43963 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,837.79 Plumbing Supplies 43964 Conech Engineering 7,767.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43965 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 2,070.00 Environmental Health Services-Newport Sewage Spill 43966 Court Omer 526.00 Wage Garnishment 43967 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 134.68 Lab Supplies 43968 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 292.19 Janitorial Supplies 43969 The Holman Group 718.52 Employee Assistance Program Premium 43970 City of Huntington Beach 13,962.84 Water Use 43971 Intl.Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 - 3,210.21 Dues Deduction 43972 IOMA, Inc. 298.95 Publication 43973 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 623.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43974 Mellon Trust 18.249.10 Investment Custodian Bank 43975 Court Omer 339.50 Wage Garnishment 43976 City of Newport Beach 182.42 Water Use 43977 NWRI National Water Research Institute 815.00 O&M Meeting Registration 43978 Orange County Marshal 364.38 Wage Garnishment 43979 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 62.77 Fittings 43980 OCEA 422.86 Dues Deduction 43981 Pacific Bell 26.20 Telephone Services 43982 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 43983 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 43984 Peace 081cers Council of CA 918.00 Dues Deduction 43965 Peak Technologies 2,534.88 Lab Parts&Supplies 43986 Quest,J.D.Edwards Users Group 995.00 Accounting Meeting Registration, Financial Information System 43987 Ryan He=Products Corp. 183.51 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43988 RMS Systems,Inc. 499.00 Safely&Emergency Response Training Registration Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 05/01/02 to 05M S/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43989 Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. 1,121.42 Lab Pens&Supplies 43990 Saratoga Institute,Inc. 3,000.00 Publication-Human Capital Benchmarking Report 43991 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 249.65 Maintenance Materials&Supplies 43992 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 44.62 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 43993 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 115.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43994 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 43995 Southern California Water 70.42 Water Use 43996 Slate Board of Equalization 442.34 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 43997 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3,484.19 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43998 Vidah Todd 692.15 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43999 Urdted Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 44000 Verizon California 841.33 Telephone Services 44001 Western Slates Corrosion Seminar,NACE 730.00 O&M Meeting Registration 44002 Xerox Corporation 87.58 Fax&Copier Leases 44003 Castillo Western Industrial Constructors 6,484.00 Construction-Clarifiers P&O Retaining Walls at Pit.2 44004 Lisa Arosteguy 714.11 Meeting/Traming Expanse Reimbursement 44005 L.Kevin Haddon 258.96 Meeling/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 44006 Lynn R.Jensen 149.85 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44007 George L. Robertson 482.55 Meetingri-ralning Expense Reimbursement 44008 David A.Usher 250.00 MeetingRralning Expense Reimbursement 44009 Voided Check - 44010 Ernest N.Veboah 597.63 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44011 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 44012 Executive Programs Harvard University 9,200.00 Engineering Training Registration, Kennedy School of Government 44013 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fee 44014 Voided Check - - 44015 Douglas M. Stewart 1,243.94 Meeting/Traming Expense Reimbursement, MO,4-24-02 44016 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 334,104.05 Professional Services J-73-2 44017 Black&Veatch Corporation 680,970.01 Engineedng Services J-77&Pl-76 44018 Blue Cross of California 226,346.71 Medical Insurance Premium 44019 Brown&Caldwell 115,689.88 Engineering Services 2.41,J•25.6& 1-98 44020 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 25.992.59 Professional Services 1-10&Sewer Mapping Maint. 44021 Carollo Engineers 418,470.21 Professional Services J-25-4,P2-66&J-87 44022 Disc Manufacturing, Inc. 26,579.35 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44023 Essex Group,Inc. 35.367.94 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44024 Fluor Enterprises, Inc. 90,578.00 Professional Services J-84 44025 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 33.763.59 Medical Insurance Premium 44026 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 128,616.62 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 44027 Lee&Ro,Inc. 61,285.46 Professional Services P247-3,5.49,&50,5-51 &5.52 44028 Mike Pdich&Sons 64,583.82 Construction-Force Mein Repairs at Bitter Point Pump Station 44029 Orange County Water District 36,484.96 GAP Water Use MO 10.23-96 44030 Pacific Investment Management Co. 149.742.00 Investment Management Service Res.95.97 44031 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 34.241.80 Sodium Hypochlorite 44032 Reliastar 26,597.55 Employee Medical Health Premium .0 Page 2 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 05/01/02 to 05/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44033 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 121,239.27 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 44034 Southern Calif.Coastal Water Research 62,125.00 Professional Services-Upstream Impact of Sewage Spills- Newport Bay 44035 Synagro Technologies, Inc. 163,781.02 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 44036 Techno Coatings 100,778.00 Rehabilitation of Low Pressure Gas Holder 44037 The Lewis Group 43,158.48 Consulting Service-Capital Project Management Process 44038 Tran Consulting Engineers 155,544.48 Engineering Services-7.21. 1.2.4&1-17 44039 Tula Ranch/MMagan Farms 150,192.90 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-96 44040 University of Southern California 95,461.00 Professional Services-Huntington Beach Shoreline Contamination Investigation 44041 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 64,849.08 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 44042 The Yakima Company 70,443.52 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 44043 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 71.104.52 Construction J-80 44044 California Bank&Trust 40,946.00 Constmcllon J-33-IA,Retention 44045 J W Contracting Corporation 278,690.00 Construction P2.60 44046 Ken Thompson, Inc. 463,540.00 Construction 6-46 44047 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,408,225.00 Construction P2-39, P1-37&J-71-7 44048 MMC, Inc. 86.712.60 Coral.-Ventilation Sys.Upgrades-Mein St.Pump Sta. 44049 R. Fox Construction, Inc. 75,982.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Pit. 1 44050 Southern Contracting Company 368.510.00 Construction J-33.1A 44051 Union Bank of California 30,955.00 Construction P2-60, Retention 44052 Urbantec Engineering,Inc. 165,141.00 Construction J-66 44053 Able Scale Repair 550.00 Loading Scales Quarterly Inspection 44054 Air Cold Supply 66.92 Air Conditioner Supplies 44D55 Airborne Express 31.65 Air Freight 44056 Airgas Safety 968.99 Safety Supplies 44057 Also Products, Inc. 485.45 Janitorial Supplies 44058 Alfa-Laval, Inc. 676.18 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 44059 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 695.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 44060 Appleone Employment Service 9.741.02 Temporary Employment Services 44061 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 13,300.00 Toxicity Testing 44062 Artistic Blinds 1,029.65 Mini Blinds&Installation 44063 Associated Readymix Concrete 529.23 Concrete 44064 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 44065 Axeda Systems, Inc. 4,714.00 Software Maintenance Agreement 44066 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 82.58 Telephone Service 44067 Bellantyne, Inc. 6,960.00 Temporary Employment Services 44068 Basic Chemical Solutions 310.55 Chemicals 44069 Battery Specialties 347.56 Batteries 44070 Camel Financial, Inc.We Bearing Metal 478.09 Metal 44071 BloMedeux Vilek, Inc. 222.55 Lab Pans&Supplies 44072 Blue Planet Foundation 2,000.00 Sponsorship-Children's Water Festival 44073 Burlington Safety Laboratory of CA, Inc. 571.00 Safety Glove Testing 44074 Bush&Associates, Inc. 3,674.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 44075 BC Wire Rope& Rigging 1,872.44 Wire, Rope&Rigging 44076 Cal-Glass, Inc. 116.88 Lab Equipment Service Page 3 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 05/01/02 to 05/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44077 California Auto Collision 993.91 Vehicle Paint&Body Repairs 44078 Calbol, Inc. 313.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44079 Cambridge Isotope Labs 2.382.95 Lab Pads&Supplies 44080 Cashco,Inc.,Go Ponton Intl., Inc. 1.037.79 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44081 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 13,199.32 Engineering Services-Anaerobic Selection Study 44082 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1,160.00 Instrument Parts 44083 Coastal Communities Hospital 5,435.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44084 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 739.51 Inst. Parts&Supplies 44085 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 5,050.52 Professional Services-Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 44086 Communications Supply Corp. 537.10 Electrical Parts&Supplies 44087 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 7,233.81 Computer Maintenance 44088 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 3,358.84 Electrical Parts&Supplies 44089 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,171.52 Plumbing Supplies 44090 Cooper Energy Systems 218.50 Engine Supplies 44091 Corporate Express Imaging 3,046.32 Computer Supplies 44092 Corporate Express 4,100.47 Office Supplies 44093 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2.785.45 Electrical Parts&Supplies 44094 Cytec Industries 18,270.00 Anions:Polymer Spec. No. 9798-18 44095 CMSS Ventures 1,795A9 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44096 CR&R,Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals 44097 CSI Computational Systems 1,395.00 O&M Training Registration 44098 CWEA Membership 224.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 44099 CWFA Specialty Conference 100.00 O&M Meeting Registration 44100 Del Mar Analytical 53.00 Biosolids Analysis 44101 Dell Direct Sales, L.P. 23,144.70 (6)Computers 44102 Diamond H Recognition 622.53 Employee Service Awards 44103 Digrrarm 9,210.47 IBM AS1400 Tape Backup 44104 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 376.45 Paint Supplies 441 OS Manc randan Duh 80.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44106 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 462.38 Electrical Supplies 44107 Eagle Aerial Imaging 10,020.00 Software Maintenance 44108 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 800.00 Medical Screening 44109 Electra-Bond, Inc. 991.30 Epoxy Coating of Pump Parts 44110 Enchanter, Inc. 4,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 44111 Environmental Resource Association 670.60 Lab Parts&Supplies 44112 Equipco Sales&Service 987.13 Inst. Repairs,Meint.& Pads 44113 ECETOC European Centre for Ecotoxioology 114.73 Publication 44114 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,070.40 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 44115 FedEx Corporation 113.70 Air Freight 44116 Filter Supply Company 125.28 Filters 44117 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 14,477.26 Lab Pads&Supplies 44118 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 242.00 Concrete Cutting 44119 Flo-Systems,Inc. 1,540.02 Pump Supplies 44120 Foodcrait Coffee&Refreshment Services 159.24 Meeting Supplies Page 4 of 10 EXHIBIT A Y Claims Paid From 05/01/02 to 05/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44121 Franklin Covey 269.06 Oliice Supplies 44122 Frys Electronics 1.039.81 Computer Supplies 44123 Fuel Technologies,Inc. 390.00 O&M Meeting Registration 44124 G matt-Callahan Company - 2,204.57 Chemicals 44125 Gates Fiberglass Installers 550.00 Repairs&Maintenance Services 44126 General Petroleum 12,189.66 Unleaded Gasoline 44127 George Yardley Co. 1,145.65 Incl. Parts&Supplies 44120 Gier ich-Mitchell,Inc. 12,466.82 Belt Filter Press Supplies 44129 Goodway,Technologies Corp. 3,964.00 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 44130 W W Grainger, Inc. 2.611.40 Electrical Pads&Supplies 44131 Graybar 1,180-16 Electrical Supplies 44132 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 89.99 Janitorial Supplies 44133 Hach Company 983.56 Mechanical Parts,Supplies& Repairs 44134 American Sigma, Inc. 7.196.15 Pump Supplies 44135 Robed or Janke Hanson 80.00 User Fee Refund He Septic Tanks 44136 Harold Primrose Ica 92.50 Ice For Samples 44137 The Hartwell Corporation 24,272.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44138 Hatch&Kirk, Inc. 4,250.58 Engine Generator Control Supplies 44139 Hello Direct, Inc. 239.24 Telephone Headsets 44140 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 193.25 Meeting Expenses 44141 Highway Products 4,650.00 (2)Custom Semi Tool Boxes 44142 Holmes&Newer, Inc. 13,230.25 Professional Services P7-44-1 &P2-53 44143 Home Depot 285.42 Small Hardware 44144 Hopkins Technical Products 1.020.53 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 44145 Houghton International,Inc. 1,220.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44146 Hub Auto Supply 57.88 Truck Paris 44147 HI Standard Automotive 2,005.04 Automotive Supplies&Installation 44148 Industrial Distribution Group 935.51 Electrical Pads It Supplies 44149 Industrial Fabrics Corp. 16,240.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44150 Industrial Metal Supply 87.54 Metal 44151 Innerline Engineering 1,185.00 Professional Services-CCTV Videoing of Trunklines 44152 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 514.81 Lab Parts&Supplies 44153 Interstate Battery Systems 908.66 Batteries 44154 Irvine Ranch Water District 6.44 Water Use 44155 IBM Corp. 1,887.42 IBM AS/400 Maintenance 44156 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 5,067.96 Instrument Supplies 44157 J.O'Brien Company,Inc. 725.78 Security Badge Supplies 44158 J.L.Wingert Company 489.83 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 44159 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 2,764.20 CCTV Videoing of Gisler/Redhill Ti unkline Sewer 44160 Jays Catering 947.45 Meeting Expenses 44161 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 8,793.00 Professional Services-Compensation&Classification Study 44162 JWC Environmental 2,971.75 Electrical Parts&Supplies 44183 Kelly Paper 45.71 Paper 44164 Lab Support 7,730.50 Temporary Employment Services Page 5 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From OSMI/O2 to 05/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44165 Labware, Inc. 23.000.00 Software Maintenance-LIMS 44166 Lindsay Engineering Services 1,512.00 Professional Services-Vibration Monitoring 44167 Llnjer Company c/o Gerald Jones 4.295.79 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 44168 Weds 167.50 Meeting Expense 44169 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 2,008.00 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 44170 Manleys Boiler Repair Company, Inc. 684.87 Mechancal Pans,Supplies&Repairs 44171 MarVac Electronics 56.91 Electrical Parts&Supplies 44172 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,315.11 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44173 McRay Industries,Inc. 523.88 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 44174 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 2,196.95 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 44175 The Penn Air Group 11,9011.00 Service Agreement-HVAC Dud Cleaning 44176 Albert or Keely Ann Medina 80.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44177 Medlin Controls Co. 2,825.10 Instrument Supplies 44178 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 44179 Mission Uniform Service 4.144.39 Uniform Rentals 44180 MotoPhoto 18.66 Photographic Services 44181 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyworks 184.78 Vehicle Painting&Repairs 44182 MCR Technologies, Inc. 603.21 Fisher Porter Charts 44183 Newark Electronics 1,214.46 Instrument Supplies 44184 Newport Corporation 12.313.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44185 Northam Tool&Equipment Company,Inc. 2.949.98 Truck Supplies 44186 Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc. 18,137.94 Professional Services 5-49 44187 NCG Porter Novelli 15,592.69 Prof.Services-Public Relations 44188 O.C.Windustrial Co. 124.95 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 44189 Office Depot Business Services Div. 770.99 Office Supplies 44190 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 389.67 Janitorial Supplies 44191 OneSoume Distributors, Inc. 78.14 Electrical Pans&Supplies 44192 Orange County Vector Control District 5,290.85 Pest Control 44193 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 2,242.12 Fittings 44194 Oxygen Service Company 1,426.91 Specialty Gases 44195 OCS Reprographics 268.26 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 44196 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 1,091.38 Filters 44197 Pacific Bell 56.81 Telephone Services 44198 Pacific Mechanical Supply 136.18 Plumbing Supplies 44199 Pacific Parts&Controls 2,475.57 Electrical Pans&Supplies 44200 Parker Hannifin Corporation 2,047.38 Filters 44201 Parker Supply Company 2,434.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44202 Parkhouse Tire Co. 318.78 Tires 44203 Parkson Corporation 23,700.00 Equipment Lease-Hycor Heliclean Washer Compactor 44204 Partners Consulting Services 120.00 Help Desk Consulting Services 44205 Parts Unlimited 538.77 Truck Supplies 44206 Patriot Video Productions 992.34 Video Services 44207 Potydyne,Inc. 16.333.74 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 44208 Power Design 4,554.52 Electrical Parts&Supplies c Page 6 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 05/01/02 to 05/16/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44209 Praxeir Distribution, Inc. 10.74 Chemicals 44210 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 44211 Primary Source 3,984.86 Office Furniture 44212 Projects Partners 2,070.52 Temporary Employment Services 44213 Protech Petroleum Services,Inc. 27.00 Stationery&Office Supplies-Thermal Paper 44214 Mr.George Pulliam 80.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44215 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 1,190.63 Pump Supplies 44216 Putzmeister 92.67 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 44217 FCS Express 330.00 Courier Service 44218 PSI 591.27 Pump 44219 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 645.46 Instrument Recallbralion&Certification 44220 R.W.Beck 519.89 Professional Services P7-90 44221 R. L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 44222 Regents of Univ.of California 6,692.90 Professional Services J-85 44223 Uese Rego 80.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44224 Rulan&Tucker,L.L.P. 528.11 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 44225 Ryan Hem Products Corp. 1,005.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44226 RBF Engineers 3,739.47 Engineering Services 2-24-1 44227 RPM Electric Motors 2,315.31 Motor Repairs 44228 S&J Supply Co.,Inc 485.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44229 Schwing America, Inc. 1,508.69 Pump Supplies 44230 Senior'Operetions, Inc. 14,185.21 (3)Pumps 44231 Sewer Equipment Company of America 1,642.28 Sewer Hose&Supplies 44232 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,207.36 Oil&Lubricants 44233 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,156.59 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44234 Supelco, Inc. 610.86 Lab Parts&Supplies 44235 Eric or Stephanie Simon 80.00 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44236 Skater,Inc. 48.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 44237 SkIIIPath On-Site 5.100.00 On-Site Training 44238 Southern California Edison 6.997.08 Power 44239 Spex Certiprep,Inc. 1.328.22 Lab Pads&Supplies 44240 Strata International, Inc. 505.46 Antibacterial Treatment of Wetwell at Michelson Pump Station 44241 Strategic Diagnostics, Inc. 53.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 44242 Summit Information Resources 10,993.13 (2)VAX Workstations 44243 Summit Steel 3,027.72 Metal 44244 Sunset Industrial Paris 2,474.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44245 Super Power Products 1,163.70 Janitorial Supplies 44246 SAWPA 3,OOD.00 Prof.Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 44247 SPX Valves&Control 586.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44248 Tem inix International Co. 275.00 Past Control 44249 Tetra Tech, Inc. 3,145.65 Professional Services 7-37 44250 Thermo Environmental Instruments 306.04 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44251 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 6,075.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44252 TBoo Industries 1,059.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 7 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 05/01/02 to 05115/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44253 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 44254 Daily Pilot 281.25 Notices&Ads 44255 The Trans Company 3,108.10 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 44256 Transcat 106.88 Electrical Supplies 44257 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River 40.00 O&M Meeting Registration 44258 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 9,725.68 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 44259 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 622.11 Truck&Auto Supplies 44250 Truesdail Laboratories,Inc. 890.00 Lab Services 44261 Tyco Valves It Controls 619.57 Mechanical Parts,Supplies& Repairs 44262 Teksystems 3,671.00 Temporary Employment Services 44263 U.S.Peroxide 7,542.50 Prof.Services-Collection Sys.Odor&Corrosion Chemical Add.Demo.Study 44264 U.W.M.C.Hospital Corp.-Anaheim 4,287.86 Recond iation User Fee Refund Program 44265 The Unisource Corporation 307.74 Office Supplies 44266 United Parcel Service 37.85 Parcel Services 44267 U-Urle 383.73 Office Supplies 44268 V L Systems,Inc. 800.00 Systems Engineering Consulting Services 44269 Valtech Energy Management 3,147.88 Professional Services-Natural Gas Consultant 44270 The Vanlage Group,L.L.C. 11,600.00 Temporary Employment Service 44271 Verizon California 1.256.53 Telephone Services 44272 Veme's Plumbing 9,025.30 Construction-Install 4'Conduits for Fiber Optic Cable at I.T.Trailers 44273 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 3.930.59 Lab Parts&Supplies 44274 The Wackenhut Corporation 3,896.99 Security Guards 44275 Wally Machinery and Tool Supply, Inc. 825.71 Mechanical Pans, Supplies&Tools 44276 Water Environment Federation 69.00 Subscription 44277 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 23,867.34 Engineering Service J-67 44278 WateReuse Association 250.00 Lab Meeting Registration 44279 Wave Sanitary Supply 371.92 Janitorial Supplies 44280 IMRI 3,355.00 Temporary Employment Services 44261 Whessoe Varec,Inc. 17,534.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44282 Witeg Scientific 204.73 Lab Supplies 44283 WEF 224.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 44284 Xerox Corporation 12.221.10 Copier&Fax Leases 44285 Yellowstone Technologies,Inc. 1,375.00 Financial Information System Software Upgrade/Implementation 44286 Noonan Eckenrode 127.55 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44287 John P.Finias 112.00 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 44288 Charles G.Lee 1,550.38 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44289 Tom B.Meregillano 186.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44290 Beatrice A.Mitchell 1,191132 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44291 Robert Dolan 981.55 Maeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44292 Andrew J. Rozenslraten 1,469.21 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44293 Phillip J.Sullivan 954.76 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimbursement 44294 Dell Computer&Pita.Antonino 1,8WL14 Employee Computer Loan Program 44295 Judith M.Bucher 960.16 Employee Computer Loan Program 44296 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 120.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration Page 8 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 05/01/02 to 05/15102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44297 Todd A. May 2,684,35 Employee Computer Loan Program 44298 Orange County Sanitation District 962.90 Petty Cash Reimb. 44299 UC Regents 170.00 O&M Meeting Registration 44300 Venzon California 79.28 Telephone Services 44301 Trieu Thien But,Michael F.Smith, 100,000.00 Claim Settlement-Tran vs.Kovacs 44302 U.S Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 44303 American Express 44,272.79 Purchasing Card Program,Misc. Supplies&Services 44304 Martin Luther Hospital 45,057.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44305 Orange County Sanitation District 470,929.31 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 44308 Margate Construction,Inc. 136,60.80 Construction J-71-2 44307 Orange County Sanitation District 28.076.43 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 44308 Airgas Safety 1,093.47 Safety Supplies 44309 American Public Works Association 2.319.00 Membership 44310 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 64.79 Telephone Service 44311 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 44312 Carl Warren&Co. 237.05 Insurance Claims Administrator 44313 Certilled Labs 501.24 Lab Supplies 44314 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 44315 Consolidated Elect, Distributors, Inc. 80.37 Electrical Supplies 44316 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 129.66 Plumbing Supplies 44317 CSMFO 10M00 Accounting Meeting Registration 44318 Employment Development Dept. 1,779.00 Stale Unemployment Tax 44319 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 44320 Guadalupe O'Campo 1.729.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44321 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,210.21 Dues Deduction 44322 McMasler-Can Supply Co. 1,954.51 Mechanical Parts, Supplies&Tools 44323 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 1,465.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44324 Court Order 339.50 Wage Garnishment 44325 Orange County Marshal 46.00 Wage Garnishment 44326 Orange Fluld System Technologies, Inc. 2,553.19 Fittings 44327 OCEA 413.61 Dues Deduction 44328 Pacific Bell 12.70 Telephone Services 44329 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 44330 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 44331 Peace Officers Council of CA 999.00 Dues Deduction 44332 Pumping Solutions, Inc. 794.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44333 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 8,464.48 Life Insurance Premium 44334 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 322.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44335 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 44336 So.Cal.Gas Company 9,581.64 Natural Gas 44337 SogChoice 13,503.54 Software 44338 Southern California Edison 1,930.08 Power 44339 Sparkletls 4,029.23 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 44340 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,371.32 Mechanical Supplies Page 9 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 05/01/02 to 05/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44341 The Trane Company 3,065.00 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 44342 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 44343 Vallen Safety Supply Company 3,805.26 Safety Supplies 44344 Vedzon California 5,913.84 Telephone Services 44345 W EFTEC 2002 c/o Expoexchange 495.00 O 8 M Meeting Registration 44346 Nicholas J.Amonles 121.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44347 Carla D. Dillon 987.81 Meeling/fraining Expense Reimbursement 44348 Mark A.Esquer 105.91 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimbursement 44349 Robert P.Ghirelll 152.10 Meeting/fraining Expense Reimbursement 44350 Randy E.Hams 466.97 MeelingrTreining Expense Reimbursement 44351 Vladimir A.Kogan 1,119.92 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44352 Chandra R.Mantecon 109.97 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44353 Edward M.Torres 701.78 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44354 Simon L Watson 419.02 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44355 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 44356 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 44357 Debbie F. Mamhegiano 308.40 Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 8,788,880.48 Payroll Disbursements 26525-26627 Employee Paychecks It 161,260.81 Biweekly Payroll 05/01/02 26629-26M Interim Paycheck 136.63 Adjustments 26630-26753 Employee Paychecks 166.678.03 Biweekly Payroll O5/15102 26754-26769 Interim Paychecks 4,11M.71 Termination Paycheck 8 Adjustments 72261-72722 Direct Deposit Statements 779,715.06 Biweekly Payroll 05/01/02 72723-73186 Direct Deposit Statements 806,454.52 Biweekly Payroll 05/15/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,909,054.76 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 117,841.44 Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 46,366.33 April Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Manhattan Bank 74,a25.72 Commitment Fee from 2/1-4/30/02 on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 239,033.49 Total Claims Paid 05101/0 2-0511 5/0 2 $ 10,936,968.73 Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 05/16/02 to 05/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 44358 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. $ 57.21 Lab Parts&Supplies 44359 Easy Frame Sign Company,Inc. 118.53 Open House Expenses 44360 Luperello Pima 282.31 Open House Expenses 44361 Rainbow Shaved Ice 400.00 Open House Expenses 44362 WIII&Company 500.00 Open House Expenses 44363 Windows-On-Our-Waters 125.00 Open House Expenses 44364 American Machinery&Blade,Inc. 62,518.06 Hydraulic Plate Shear Installation&Accessories 44365 AKM Consulting Engineers 90.245.66 Professional Services 7-36,7-39&7-41 44367 Black&Veatch Corporation 88,659.64 Engineering Services J-87 44368 Brown&Caldwell 74,159.61 Engineering Services 2-41 44368 Burch Ford 84.842.35 (5)2002 Ford Taurus 4-Door Sedans 44370 BP Energy Company 105,999.99 Natural Gas 44371 Carollo Engineers 26,321.71 Professional Services P1-60&P2-60 44372 Delta Dental 52,741.01 Dental Insurance Plan 44373 Health Science Associates 30,584.50 Professional Services-Asbestos Study 44374 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 30,426.00 Construction J-87,3-2-1 &Sludge Spill Removal on 4117/02 44375 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 51,556.39 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 44376 Mike Paich&Sons 51,876.25 Construction-Force Main Repairs at Bitter Point Pump Station 44377 Northwest Industrial Scrub,Inc. 28,962.00 Professional Services-Sludge Removal and Cleaning Digester No.5 44378 OCB Reprographics 54,808.63 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 44379 Polydyne,Inc. 31,780.98 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 44380 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 29,735.00 Engineering Services-Dewater(3)Siphon Air Vent Manholes 44381 Techno Coatings 58.948.00 Epoxy Coating of(23)Fiberglass Chemical Storage Tanks/Scrubber Towers&Dueling 44382 Term Tech,Inc. 37,217.24 Professional Service-Ocean Monitonng Program 44383 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 33,462.31 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 44384 Elser Constructors,Inc. 387,816.00 Construction 3-25 44385 MMC, Inc. 64,384.71 Const.-Ventilation Sys.Upgrades-Main St.Pump St& 44386 Great American Panting Co. 264.66 Panting 44387 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 16,157.20 Professional Services-CSG Fuel Mixing For Emission Control 44388 Air Uquide America Corp. 837.53 Specialty Gasses 44389 Air Products&Chemicals 396.28 Lab Supplies 44390 Airborne Express 52.25 Air Freight 44391 Airgas Safely 4,619.40 Safety Supplies 44392 Alta-Robbins,Inc. 354.22 Instrument Supplies 44393 American Society for Quality 90.00 Membership 44394 Ametek Rotron 2,697.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44395 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 695.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 44396 Arizona Instrument 165.10 Instrument Supplies 44397 Asbury Environmental Services 185.00 Waste Oil Removal 44396 American Society for Testing&Materials 99.00 Publication 44399 ARMA International,Inc. 165.00 Membership 44400 AT&T Universal Biller 5.76 Telephone Services 44401 AWSI 173.00 Department of Transportation Training Program Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 05/16/02 to 05/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44402 Bell Land Surveying 15,212.50 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 44403 BioMedeux Vitek,Inc. 1,128.66 Lab Supplies 44404 BioVir Laboratories 1,896.00 Lab Analyses 44405 Boyle Engineering Corporation 1,302.55 Engineering Services 6-13 44406 Brenntag West,Inc. 493.59 Janitorial Supplies 44407 Bush&Associates,Inc. 580.00 Surveying Services 5-23-01 44408 California Comfort Vans 4,181.75 Van Interior Upgrade 44409 California Relocation Services,Inc. 455.41 Office Moving Services 44410 Callan Associates,Inc. 3,550.00 Investment Advisor 44411 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 2,083.33 Professional Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 44412 Cad Warren&Co. 418.31 Insurance Claims Administrator 44413 Center for Creative Growth 3,500.00 Professional Services-Management Training 44414 Chad"P.Crowley Co. 1.002.46 Instrument Parts 44415 Coast Fire Equipment 1,541.04 Service Agreement-Fire Extinguisher Testing,Recharging&Certification 44416 Coded Street Sweeping 406.00 Street Sweeping-Biosolids Spill 4117/02 44417 Compressor Components of California 17,634.37 Mechanical Repairs&Pads-Heat Exchanger 44418 Consolidated Elect.Distdbulors,Inc. 9,366.58 Electrical Pads&Supplies 44419 Consolidated Freightways 582.01 Freight 44420 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 581.37 Plumbing Supplies 44421 Convey Compliance Systems, Inc. 340.00 Software Maintenance Agreement 44422 Conveyor Components Cc 305.43 Electrical Pads&Supplies 44423 Cooper Energy Services 1,625.38 Engine Supplies 44424 Cooper Energy Systems 1,461.77 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 44425 Corporate Express 171.30 Office Supplies 44426 Cost Containment Solutions 998.87 Workers Comp.Services 44427 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 1,919.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44428 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 490.08 Maint.Agreement-Repairs8nstallation of Base, Handheld&Vehicle Radios 44429 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,058.62 Electrical Pads&Supplies 44430 Crane America Services, Inc. 1,854.24 Crane Services 44431 Cyclus Envirosystems,Inc. 5.080.76 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 44432 California Pipeline Inspection 5,914.95 CCTV Sewerline Inspection 44433 CR&R, Inc. 3,884.53 Container Rentals 44434 CWEA Membership 70.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 44435 Dbnex Corporation 867.31 Lab Pads&Supplies 44436 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 132.42 Electrical Supplies 44437 Ecology Control Industries 4A10.55 Hazardous Waste Disposal 44438 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 14,914.26 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-April 2002 44439 Enchanter,Inc. 7,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 44440 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 15.000.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 44441 Environmental Data Solutions Grips,L.L.0 1575.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info.Mgmt.Sys.Implementation Project 44442 Filter Supply Company 41853 Filter Pads 44443 First American Real Estate Solutions 320.35 Orange County Property Information 44444 Fisher Scientific Company,LLC. 2,657.55 Lab Pars&Supplies 44445 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 264.00 Concrete Drilling c Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From OSMS/02 to 05/31/02 c Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44446 Flo-Systems,Inc. 7,904.75 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44447 Fluid Tech.A Div.of FLW,Inc. 543.99 Instrument Supplies 44448 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 23.00 Meeting Supplies 44449 Franklin Covey 26.21 Office Supplies 44460 Frazee Paint and Wallcovedng 137.92 Paint Supplies 44461 Frost Engineering 1,054.49 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44452 FLW,Inc. 355.38 Inst.Pans&Supplies 44453 FST Sand and Gravel,Inc. 722.06 Gravel 44464 Gemini Associates,Inc. 496.88 Fiber Optic Cable 44455 General Petroleum 22,860.78 Lube Oil 44456 George Yardley Co. 283.62 Inst.Pans&Supplies 44457 Gold Systems, Inc. 326.26 Professional Services-Data Migration&STORET Interface Application 44468 Graham Corporation 347.63 Vacuum Pump 44459 WIN Grainger,Inc. 1,102.29 Safety Supplies 44460 Graybar 8,174.38 Electrical Pens&Supplies 44461 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 179.99 Janitorial Supplies 44462 American Sigma, Inc. 14,394.30 Pump Supplies&Tubing 44463 Harrington lndusmal Plastics,Inc. 209.94 Fiberglass 44464 Hasco Oil Co., Inc. 78.34 Lube Oil 44465 Hill Brothers 10,062.60 Odor&Corrosion Control Chemicals for Newport Trunkline 44466 Home Depot 337.22 Small Hardware 44467 Hopkins Technical Products 12,520.67 Pump Supplies 44468 Hub Auto Supply 96.20 Truck Pans&Supplies 44489 Imaging Express 440.00 Printer Maintenance 44470 imaging Plus,Inc. 1,823.77 Printing Service 44471 Industrial Distribution Group 3.366.44 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44472 Industrial Metal Supply $58.27 Metal 44473 Infomtation Resources 250.00 Human Resources Service 44474 Insurance Educational Association 155.00 Safety&Emergency Response Meeting Registration 44475 Interstate Battery Systems 607.06 Batteries 44476 Intmtek Computer,Inc. 1,140.00 Network&Server Maintenance 44477 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 216.00 Oilate Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 44478 IBM Corp. 482.22 IBM AS/400 Lease 44479 IKON Office Solutions,Inc. 16,896,01 Computer Hardware/Software 44480 IN,Inc. 2,419.00 Service Agreement-Communication Equipment 44481 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 935.27 Instrument Paris&Supplies 44482 J.L.Wingert Company 1,318.66 Instrument Pans&Supplies 44483 Jays Catering 1.969.58 Meeting Expenses 44484 Johnstone Supply 186.85 Electrical Supplies 44485 JPC Construction 2,850.00 Construction-Remove&Replace Laminated Countertops in Lab Bldg.Restrooms 44486 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 8.210.90 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 44487 Kaman Industrial Technologies 724.96 Mechanical Supplies 44488 Kevin Cason 6,667.92 Prof.Services-Analysis for Physical Oceanographic Data 44489 KMI Industries,Inc. 345.62 Piping Supplies Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From OS/16102 to 05/31/02 Warrant No. Vander Amount Description 44490 Lew Offices of Kinds,Rodger&Spriggs 12,714.68. Legal Services-Tran vs, Kovacs 44491 Law/Crandall 379.00 Professional Services-Soils Testing 44492 Long Beach Iron Works 20,041.51 Manhole Covers&Frames 44493 Long Beach Une-X 662.00 Truck Spray Bed Liner 44494 Lormen Education Services 239.00 Safety&Emergency Response Meeting Registration 44495 Luccl's 153.75 Meeting Expense 44496 M.J.Schiff&Assoclates,Inc. 1,275,27 Professional Services-Conasion Study 44497 Mc Junkln Cory-Ontada Branch 101.14 Plumbing Supplies 44498 MOCrometer, Inc. 605.17 (1)Flow Meter 44499 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 2,469.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44500 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 2,355.82 Mechanical Seal&Repairs an Chopper Pump 44501 Medlin Controls Co. 83.96 Instrument Parts&Supplies 44502 Michael Tumlpseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 44603 Mission Uniform Service 2,544.00 Uniform Rentals 44504 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyworks 586.21 Vehicle Painting 44505 MDS Consulting 1,225.00 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Locations 44506 National Mlcrocomp Services 1,212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 44507 National Plant Services,Inc. 1,400.00 Vacuum Truck Services 44508 NetVersant of Silicone Valley 564.45 Security System Maintenance 44509 NetVersant of Southern California 10.558.82 Human Resources Security System Improvements 44510 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 160.00 O&M Training Registration 44511 Newark Electronics 359.04 Instrument Pads&Supplies 44612 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 2,202.75 Prof.Sow.-Materials Testing,P2-60&J-66 44613 NOG Porter Novelli 13,986.94 Prof.Services-Public Relations 44514 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,258.62 Office Supplies 44515 OneSouroe Distributors,Inc. 11.85 Electrical Pads&Supplies 44516 Orange County Forum 150.00 Membership 44517 Orange County Hose Company 21.55 Hose Supplies&Repairs 44518 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 954.09 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 44519 Oxygen Service Company 1,779.03 Specialty Gases 44520 OCE-USA, Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 44521 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 628.32 Electrical Supplies 44522 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 44523 Pacific Mechanical Supply 360.83 Plumbing Supplies 44624 Pacific Parts&Controls (1,349.67 Computer Hardware/Software 44525 Panametrics 3,665.38 Instrument Pads&Supplies 44526 Parker Supply Company 679.99 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 44527 Pioneer Amedcas,Inc. 13.402.14 Sodium Hypochlodte 44528 Power Systems Testing 1,696.00 Electrical Equipment Repairs&Testing 44629 Praxair, Inc. 10.74 Lab Supplies 44530 Primary Source 24,727.81 Office Furniture 44631 Propipe 3,750.00 CCTV Sewedine Inspection-Various Locations 44532 R&R Instrumentallon,Inc. 352.89 Recelibretlon&Codification of(5)Flukes 44533 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,289.70 Trash Removal m Page 4 018 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 05/16/02 to 05/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44534 Reeltime Systems Corporation 3,675.00 Professional Services-Supervisory Conlrol&Data Acqusltlon Software Upgrade 44535 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 8,433.34 Employee Life Ins.Premium,Shod-Tenn Disability&Cancer Ins.Payroll Deduction 44536 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 5,883.74 Pump Supplies 44537 Ryan Nano Products Corp. 2.390.80 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 44538 RBF Engineers 808.83 Engineering Services 2-24.1 44539 RPM Electric Motors 3,700.51 Motor Repairs 44540 S&J Supply Co.,Inc. 758.93 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 44541 Schwing Amadca, Inc. 3,675.06 Pump Supplies 44542 Science Applications Intl.Corp. 11,720.07 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 44543 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 126.38 Specialty Gases 44544 Shell-Branded Service Station 1,752.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 44545 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 354.83 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 44546 SkillPath Seminars 199.00 Training Registration 44547 SoftView Computer Products 684.09 (3)Keyboards and Keyboard Platforms 44648 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 150.00 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc. Permit Fees 44549 Southern California Water Committee,Inc. 750.00 Membership 44650 Spading Instruments,Inc. 1,567.11 Instrument Supplies 44551 Spex Cediprep, Inc. 79.88 Lab Pads&Supplies 44552 Stanley Steamer International,Inc. 72.00 Carpet Cleaning 44553 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 59.18 Stationery&Office Supplies 44554 Strata International,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 44566 Suncor Stainless,Inc. 28.59 Lab Pads&Supplies 44556 Sunset Industrial Pans 241.34 Hoses 44557 SARWG,c/o Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 80.00 Santa Ana River Watershed Group Meeting Expenses 44558 SAWPA 3,000.00 Prof.Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 44559 SPX Valves&Control 21,844.05 Valves 44560 STL Sacramento 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 44561 Tenninix International Co. 275.00 Pest Control 44562 The Orange County Register 4,469.60 Notices&Ads 44563 Thomas Grey&Assoc. 460.00 Safety Supplies 44564 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 101.21 Mechanical Supplies 44665 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 44566 The Trans Company 597.54 Electrical Pads&Supplies 44567 US Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 44568 Ultra Scientific 52.34 Lab Pans&Supplies 44569 The Unisoume Corporation 628.94 Office Supplies 44570 Naval Post Graduate School 15,787.48 Professional Services J-85 44571 Universal Specialties, Inc. 24.22 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44572 Urban Water Institute,Inc. 400.00 Administratlon Meeting Registration 44573 UCI Regents 13,651.18 Professional Services J-85 44574 V L Systems,Inc. 800.00 Software Upgrade&Support 44576 Verde's Plumbing 2.300.00 Testing&Codification of Beckflow Devices at Plants 1 &2&Pump Stations 44576 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.394.76 Vision Service Premium 44577 Vortex Industries,Inc. 2,904.31 Repelrs to Roll-Up Door at Pit.2 Instrument Shop Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 05/16/02 to 06y31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44578 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 3,DS5.85 Lab Supplies 44579 The Wackenhut Corporation 13.364.09 Security Guards 44580 Waco Filter 73.95 Filters 44581 Wally Machinery and Tool Supply,Inc. 230.76 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 44582 Watson Wyatt Data Services 399.00 Publication 44583 Wade Sanitary Supply 389.05 Janitorial Supplies 44584 Westmark Paint Co. 246.60 Painting Supplies 44585 Arthur Wolfson Ph.D 22,761.71 Professional Services-NPDES Permit Renewal 44586 W EFTEC 2002 c/o Expoexchange 990.00 Source Control Training Registration 44687 WRM 2002 65.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration 44588 Xerox Corporation 214.73 Fax Lease 44589 Yokogawa Corporation of America 1,963.98 Instrument Supplies 44590 Dean M.Carrico 356.15 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44591 James D.Niswonger 1,447.63 Meating/rraining Expense Reimbursement 44592 Mahin Talebi 1,132.05 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44593 WEFTEC 2002 o/o Expoexchange 670.00 O&M Training Registration 44594 Orange County Sanitation District 2,348.39 Petty Cash Reimb. 44595 Quest-J.D.Edwards Users Group 1,400.00 Membership 44596 Robert Tighe 20,000.00 Claim Settlement Mortelette Family Trust,at at 44597 Blosolids Holding Account 126,472.45 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 44588 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 29,800.00 Software Maintenance Agreement 44599 Margate Construction, Inc. 87.324.90 Conakuc9on J-71-1 &J-71-2 44600 Orange County Sanitation District 467,579.22 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 44601 Painewebber Incorporated 32,575.01 COP Remarketing Agreement-1992 Series Advanced Refunding COPS 44602 Southern California Edison 177,172.61 Power 44603 Airgas Safety 293.03 Safety Supplies 44604 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 17.51 Mechanical Supplies 44605 Angel Santiago 327.61 Witness Reimbursement 44606 ASSE American Sac.of Safety Engineers 150.00 Membership 44607 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 598.73 Telephone Service 44608 Cel12CeII 4,975.03 Telephone Equipment 44609 Copelco Capital,Inc. 2,584.40 Copier Lease 44610 City of Fountain Valley 21.234.08 Water Use 44611 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 648.30 Electrical Parts&Supplies 44612 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 4.276.53 Plumbing Supplies 44613 Dharma Consulting 4,000.00 Professional Services-EMT Training 44614 Greybar 3,448.97 Computer Hardware/Software 44615 Hannan Miller Workplace Resource 778.49 File Cabinet 44616 Hydrolex 1,891.35 Transmission Oil 44617 Industrial Metal Supply 1,071.75 Metal 44618 Institute for Local Sell Government 110.00 Publication 44619 Irvine Ranch Water District 56.12 Water Use 44620 IDMS:Imaging Document Mgmt.Solutions 9,230.59 Contract Services J-25-1 44621 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 832.62 Installation of Gate to Access Manhole on Private Property 8 Easement Clearing Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT B '- Claims Paid From 05/16/02 to 05/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44622 Lawyers Title Company 1,695.00 Preliminary Title Report-Bitter Point Pump Station 44623 Matthew Bender&Co.,Inc. 244.68 Publication 44624 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 36.44 Key Stock 44625 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 7.089.95 Rotor Fabrication 446M Court Order 339.50 Wage Garnishment 44627 Orange County Business Council 90.00 Communications Meeting Registration 44628 Orange County Marshal 353.39 Wage Garnishment 44629 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 106.98 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44630 OCEA 413.61 Dues Deduction 44631 Pacific Bell 76.99 Telephone Services 44632 AS Hughes Co,Inc. 455.41 Paint Supplies 44833 Sexlinger,Martha 156.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44634 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 3,360.34 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 44635 Southern California Edison 26.81 Power 44636 SCAP 20.00 Communications Meeting Registration 44637 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 44638 UC Regents 1.170.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 44639 Verizon California 74.64 Telephone Services 44640 WEF 148.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 44641 Patrick B.Carnahan 1,158.07 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 44642 Norman Eckenrods 774.15 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 44643 Martin G.England 395.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44644 John M.Gullixson 536.68 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 44645 Julie A.Matsumoto 199.50 Meeting/rmining Expense Reimbursement 44646 David Rodriguez 462.58 Meeting/Frefning Expense Reimbursement 44647 David A.Usher 252.87 Meeling/fralning Expense Reimbursement 44648 Albertson,Wyatt 156.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44649 Ash,Robert 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44650 Beaver,Madeline 783.65 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44651 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,185.00 Special Assessment Fee 44652 Crary,Catherine 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44653 Daniels,Francis 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44654 Dean,Lucile 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44655 Diaz,Dennis 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44656 Eastman,Elks 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44657 Geisbush,G 156.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44658 Grafton,Tom 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44659 Grillo,Michael 156.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44660 Grooendycke,Lois 783.56 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44661 Hacker,Thomas 783.65 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44662 Jeffs,Wallace 783.65 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44663 Johnson,eery 783.65 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44664 Johnson,Steven 166.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44666 Klelnhelnz,Anna Marie 156.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 05/16/02 to 05/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 44666 Lawrence,Richard 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44667 Layton,Richard 783.65 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44668 Locasso,James 793.56 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44669 Lundstrom,Marjorie 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44670 Marinez,Joe 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44671 Maynard,Gloda 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44672 Mc Rae,Bonnie 156.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44673 Metger,William 298.94 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44674 Michelson,Frederick 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44675 Miner,Loren 783.65 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44676 Dennis Murphy 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44677 Nelson,R.Jane 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44678 Petersen,John 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44679 Pickford,R. 156.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44680 Rainey,Rosaline 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44681 Reynolds,William 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44682 Shopsnn,Mervyn 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44683 Slino,John 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44684 Stelan,Albert 156.34 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44685 Suchy,Robert 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44686 Tagle,Bruce 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 44687 Underwood,Adyce Ann 783.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,160,826.55 Payroll Disbursements 26760-26860 Employee Paychecks $ 166,369.65 Biweekly Payroll 05/29/02 26861 .26861 Intenm Paycheck 3.011.69 Termination Paycheck 73187-73645 Direct Deposit Statements 820,176.18 Biweekly Payroll OW9102 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 979,557.42 Wire Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust Co. of CA $ 330,538.73 May Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation Lloyds TSB Bank pic 77,993.81 Commitment Fees for 02/01/02 to 05/01/02 Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 408,532.34 Total Claims Paid 05116/02-05/31/02 $ 4,548,916.32 Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT B BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To 0G.of Dir. O6/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Iem Number ___ u(al Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-11, Establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2002-03 for the District in accordance with the Provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code. SUMMARY This routine annual action appearing on the agenda adopts a resolution establishing the spending limit for"proceeds of taxes" in accordance with Article All B of the Constitution of the State of California. The District's actual appropriations are well below the limit. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A G:wm ".R.w. =e Id noena.rv.p.n.wwauam rr�e�.axrv.aa< ed.�W: °M Page 1 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. OCSD 02-11 GGS:Ic G1p CldU a%B ,d A;Wn R�12C01B Id 111a1 G NGa R ., 11 a Page 2 W RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-11 ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as proposed by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations limit of each local government agency shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year, adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population, except as otherwise specifically provided for in said Article; and, WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section 7900)to Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to implement Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and, WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution,establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly-scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen (15) days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and, WHEREAS, Section 7902(a)of the Government Code sets forth the method for determining the appropriations limit for each local jurisdiction for the 2002-03 fiscal year; and, G WA�l gn6g Prya1W=B W PYmN ReMeNEONbm Itle).WNN.6x RWH W; 11M Page 3 v WHEREAS,the Board of Directors wishes to establish the appropriations limit for fiscal year 2D02-03 for the District. NOW,THEREFORE,the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for the Orange County Sanitation District,for fiscal year 2002-03, was available to the public in the Finance Department of said District at least fifteen (15)days prior to this date. Section 2: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 2002-03 for the Orange County Sanitation District, as established in accordance with Section 7902(b)of the California Government Code is$59,660,000 which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for fiscal year 2002-03. Section 3: That the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, has determined that the percent change in assessed valuation due to new non-residential construction would be the cost of living factor to be used in calculating the Orange County Sanitation District's appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 2002-03. Section 4: The determination of the appropriation limit is based upon the best and most complete information available at this time. The District reserves the right to review and re-establish a new and different limit in the event that it subsequently determines that a modification of the limitation amount is appropriate. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 26, 2002. G:Mwwuo�Mmsenema+Amu��zavi soma naaea new�11(a). +Nlw Page 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mftdng Date I To Bd.or Dir. 6/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number _11(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Shabbir Basrai, Engineer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PLANT NO. 2 OXYGEN PLANT REPLACEMENTIREHABILITATION ASSESSMENT, CAPITAL PROJECT NO. SP-72. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Assignment of Contract of Professional Services Agreement from m2T Technologies to DWG Associates for Plant No. 2 Oxygen Plant Replacement/Rehabilitation Assessment, Job No. SP-72. SUMMARY • An agreement with m2t Technologies to provide professional services for the evaluation of alternatives for Plant No. 2 Oxygen Plant Replacement/Rehabilitation Assessment, Job No. SP-72, for an amount not to exceed $97,000 was approved by the District Board on April 24, 2002. • m2t Technologies has requested that this project be conducted through its wholly owned subsidiary, DWG Associates. • This is an administrative change only. It will have no impact on the project. The personnel, scope, costs and deliverables provided in the original proposal by m2t Technologies will remain the same upon assignment. • Staff recommends the assignment of the professional service agreement from m2t Technologies to DWG Associates. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS None SB:ct G:\wp.dW\am\820\basrai\Board Items\Sp-72 PSA ConUact Reassignmenldoc Page 2 4 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, May 22, 2002 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel Norm Eckenrode, Chair Joey Racano Shirley McCracken, Vice Chair Randy Fuhrman Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Doug Korthof Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Jan Vandersloot Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Directors Absent: Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Jim Silva, County Supervisor David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Greg Mathews,Assistant to the General Manager Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Ryal Wheeler, Maintenance Supervisor Lynn Jensen, Administrative Assistant (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Doug Korthof suggested that the chair express an official position on the waiver. Mr. Jan Vandersloot requested that an explanation be given regarding the scientists' position on bacteria levels on the beach. Mr. Joey Racano gave an apology to Director Steve Anderson regarding his vote on the renewal of the waiver. Mr. Randy Fuhrman suggested that in the event the effluent plume reaches shore,the projected long-term effects should be made public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the April 24, 2002 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Eckenrode reported on the spring CASA conference where the following items were covered: Changes in environmental laws; changes In employment laws; and pending legislation. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 May 22, 2002 Chair Eckenrode indicated he is very interested in microfiltration, and thinks it will be well-received as further studies are completed. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson and staff reported on several issues, as follows. A. Maddox Bill (AB7969) Mr. Anderson reported on the current status of the Maddox bill. The Assembly Appropriations Committee approved the bill today and referred it to the full Assembly for consideration. Lisa Murphy indicated the full local disclosure language has been added to the bill, which passed with one no vote. B. Harman Bill (AB 1892) Mr.Anderson provided a progress report on the Harman Bill, which has moved successfully through the assembly and has been referred to the Senate. He explained that the state is not required to pay for the directives of the bill, (concerning dry weather runoff)which has little opposition at this time. C. GWRS Progress Report Blake Anderson reported on the status of the GWRS Project which has received $30 million from the state for the project. The project is to include areas up to the Anaheim Forebay, which might be too broad a scope for the project. He announced the retirement of Tom Dawes, project manager,whose temporary replacement has been announced as Bill Everest. Mr.Anderson noted OCSD would like to participate in the selection of a new project manager. D. Disinfection Project Mr.Anderson reported on the progress of getting the disinfection project moving forward, with the hope that we will be able to disinfect during at least part of the summer with help from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. A motion was made, seconded, and unanimously carried to recommend moving forward with this project. E. SARI Relocation Project Blake Anderson asked for direction from the Steering Committee regarding his proposed letter to SAW PA requiring early resolution of the$3 million that SAW PA owes us for work on the SARI Line relocation project. Mr.Woodruff spoke regarding the new attorney review of the agreement, which will likely now go through further extensive reviews, even though it has been through over 30 drafts to date. The Steering Committee directed him to send the"get tough"letter to SAW PA. Mr.Anderson reported that CalTrans will be pumping out the hot storm drain in Newport Beach. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff provided an update on two matters of litigation. Mr.Woodruff reported the Tran lawsuit was settled for far less than the requested amount, as was the Newport Beach contractor lawsuit. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-H) A. County of Orange request to waive Connection fees for Select Properties in Unincorporated area of Santa Ana. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 ' May 22, 2002 After discussion, the Steering Committee directed staff to continue to charge new connections consistent with adopted fee schedules, but to allow time payments for large sums due. B. Consider Ballot Initiative for 301(h)Waiver Director Steve Anderson asked that the Steering Committee consider the idea of placing a ballot measure regarding the ocean discharge question on the November ballot. After discussion, the Steering Committee directed staff to put a brief paper together discussing the pros and cons and summary of the logistics of putting such a measure on the ballot. C. Buy American Policy The Steering Committee discussed the question of a buy American policy related to the purchase of equipment for the Groundwater Replenishment System. The Steering Committee decided to recommend to the Board that Item 6-C be referred back to the G W RS JCC. D. Preparation for June 26 Board Meeting The Steering Committee discussed preparations for the upcoming June 26 Board meeting, presently scheduled as the night the Board decides on level of treatment. After discussion,the Steering Committee directed staff to continue to assume a decision on June 26 and for staff to outline the alternatives without a recommendation. E. Consider changing Board meeting start time and agenda order for June 26, 2002 Board meeting; i.e. Steering Committee at 5 p.m., Board Meeting Closed Session at 6:30 p.m. and consideration of regular agenda at 7 p.m. The Committee decided to change the start of the June 26 Board meeting to 6:30 p.m. and will begin the meeting in closed session. The Board will reconvene in open session at 7:p.m. F. Review and consideration of Agenda Items for the operating committee meetings in June. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the operating committees in June were reviewed. - G. Review and consideration of Agenda Items for Board of Directors Meeting of May 22, 2002. The agenda items for tonight's Board meeting were reviewed to answer questions or get clarification. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 May 22, 2002 (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday,June 26, 2002 at 5 p.m. There will be a Special Board Meeting on Wednesday, June 19, beginning at 6 p.m. The next Regular Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 26, 2002 at 6:30 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:35 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Section 54956.9, to discuss two potential cases of litigation. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:50 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Submitted by: LynK�Jensen Administrative Assistant a:lwpAtalegendatsteming c mmMeelo2maylo=2 SC MmWes.dw I Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, June 5, 2002 — 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on June 5, 2002, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Norm Eckenrcde, Board Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Don Bankhead Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Manager Debbie Cook Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Tony Kawashima Ed Torres, Special Projects Manager Anna Piercy Mike Moore, ECM Manager Tod Ridgeway John Swindler Paul Walker Robert Thiede Rebecca Brooks, Associate Engineer Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Others: Larry Porter Jan Vandersloot (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointrnent was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Larry Porter addressed the Committee about ocean discharge issues. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance , and Technical Services Committee Page 2 June 5, 2002 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair reported that the Senate Environmental Committee will vote on the Maddox Bill (AB1969) June 17. Director McGuigan also reminded the Directors of the special Board Meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 1 e, at 6:00 p.m. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not in attendance. Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reviewed the basic elements of the proposed FY 02I03 Budget which was distributed to the Directors that evening. He reported that staff would be recommending that Budget"B",which includes disinfection of the effluent, be adopted. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the May 1, 2002 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting was approved as drafted and ordered filed. b. OWS02-35 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. C. OMTS02-36 Receive and file Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance, financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 6(a)and (b)under Consent Calendar. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS02-37 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to finalize negotiations and subsequently award a contract to Systime Computer Corporation for JD Edwards OneWorld Implementation, Specification No. 5-2001-621313, providing for the migration and upgrade of the District's Financial Information System,for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000, which includes a $350,000 contingency. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. OMTS02-38 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to negotiate and subsequently award a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Brown & Caldwell Consulting providing for consulting services in connection with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's newly adopted Waste Discharge Requirements,in an amount not S Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 June 5, 2002 to exceed $700,000,for the contract period of July 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004. Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Manager, gave a brief report on the need to quickly mobilize a team that is highly experienced with Waste Discharge Requirements regulations that need to be developed by the District, member cities and sewering agencies, thus the request for an agreement to be awarded to Brown & Caldwell Consulting on a sole source basis. Directors suggested that staff use alternative language rather than "sole source"unless the vendor is the only one who can provide the requested services. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. OMTS02-39 Recommend to the Board of Directors to(1)approve Change order No. 1 to P.O. No. 101150 issued to Hill Brothers Chemical Company,for the Purchase of Magnesium Hydroxide Solution, Specification No. C-2002- 83BD,for odor and corrosion control in the Newport Trunklines, providing for a time extension of two months (through August 31, 2002),for an additional amount not to exceed $80,000,for a total contract amount not to exceed $175,000; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to competitively bid and subsequently award the Purchase of Magnesium Hydroxide Solution, Specification No. C-2002-95BD, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for a total amount not to exceed $493,000, including a 20% contingency amount of$83,000, for the period September 1, 2002 through August 31, 2003,with two one-year renewal options to include a 100/6 annual cost escalation. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. d. OMTS02-40 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award a sole source contract with US Peroxide Inc.,for a one-year demonstration of a proprietary chemical process consisting of ferrous chloride and hydrogen peroxide treatment for odor and corrosion control in the Miller-Holder, Knott and Baker-Gisler trunklines,for the period August 1, 2002 through July 30, 2003,for an estimated amount not to exceed $2,434,000,which includes a contingency amount of$116,000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 June 5, 2002 (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS02-41 Ocean Discharge Issues Update Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported that the Newport Beach storm drain that drains into the mouth of the Santa Ana River and identified as a source of high bacteria, has been drained into the District's facility. Staff Is working with the City and Cal Trans to develop a diversion system to permanently flow into the District's facilities. It was also reported that in order to undertake disinfection of the District's effluent, a modification of the ocean discharge permit would be required. Discussions have begun with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)staff, and they are proposing to consider a modification of the District's permit at their July W meeting. The modification to the permit would add some limits on chlorine residuals, toxicity testing, and ocean water standards for bacteria. Mr. Ghirelli advised that recovery of costs by local government with regard to the management of urban runoff storm waters would be subject to the Proposition 218 process. It was also reported that staff has been working with the Orange County Congressional Delegation to try to get support for funding to help pay for some of the facilities that will be needed for additional treatment. The Delegation has agreed to sign a joint-request letter that will be go to the Appropriations Committee. At this time it appears there is strong support for a $3 million request. b. OMTS02-42 Ocean Discharge Permit Annual Report Compliance Summaries Rebecca Brooks, ECM Associate Engineer, summarized the activities undertaken throughout the year and briefly reviewed the four annual reports that are prepared annually as a requirement of the Ocean Discharge Permit issued by the EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. C. OMTS02-43 Secondary Treatment Capacity Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager, described the current secondary treatment capacity available at both treatment plants, the methodology of planning for capacity, and the need for additional capacity. He also reviewed the capital improvement projects for the existing secondary treatment facilities. Director Ridgeway stated he had requested the General Manager to schedule a meeting for the full Board to discuss policy on secondary treatment capacity. Gary Streed advised the Directors that at the special Board meeting to be held on June 1 g1b, discussion would be held on the strategic planning of possible additional secondary treatment facilities. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee r Page 5 June 5, 2002 (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology had no report. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Director of Operations and Maintenance was not present. Mark Esquer updated the Directors on the disinfection project and the CEQA process,which will not be complete until October, and final CEQA statement would be adopted by the Board of Directors at the November Board meeting. Facilities would then be constructed and operational by summer of 2003. If the RWQCB issues a permit modification to the District's waiver at their July board meeting, the District would be required to move to disinfection as soon as possible as the modification would then become mandated. Staff is proceeding also on this possibility and hopes to have temporary facilities in place and partially operational by mid-August,which would be used through January of 2003 when permanent facilities could be completed. He then advised that a recommendation would be going to the full Board for consideration on June 26t requesting authorization to receive bids for various chemicals that must be purchased,estimated to be at$7 million, and to award a contract in order to meet the operational time frame of mid-August. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services had no report. (12) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not in attendance. (13) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance 1 and Technical Services Committee ; Page 6 June 5, 2002 (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for August 7, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:42 p.m. Submitted by: dili"e /�- Penny M. 9yle Operations, Maint ance and Technical Services Committee Secretary G1wp.Alala9enda\0MTS1200212002 OMTS Minutes1050102 n lnulw.d= OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date TO Bd.of Dir. 06/05/02 O6/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Item Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Originator: Robert Thiede, Strategic Implementation Leader SUBJECT: FIS Phase II —ONEWORLD XE MIGRATION JOB NO, SP-64 Specification Number S-2001-62BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to finalize negotiations and subsequently award a contract to Systime Computer Corporation for JD Edwards OneWorld Implementation, Specification No. S-2001-6213D, providing for the migration and upgrade of the District's Financial Information system, for a total amount not to exceed $1,300,000, which includes a $350,000 contingency. SUMMARY • The District went live on our J. D. Edwards Financial Information System in March of 1998. The system has been a proven benefit and improvement for the agency but has also opened up the potential for improved data access and reporting, streamlined business processes, and better integration with other District computer systems. • The implementation team intended to address identified problems with the upgrade to the newer OneWorld product in 1999. • Due to problems with the new software release and year 2000-rollover concerns, the upgrade to OneWorld was postponed. • In November 2000 the IT Department completed an agency-wide needs assessment study of our current Financial Information System. • The study concluded that business process re-engineering not completed in the original implementation is still needed. • The study found that our current Financial Information System (FIS)would also need an upgrade to remain maintainable and supportable. • The study concluded that migration to the current release (JD Edwards OneWorld XE) would stabilize maintenance, improve functionality, and extend the capabilities of our current system. • Based on these findings, Capital Improvement Project SP-64 was developed and approved in the FY 2000/01 Budget. • A Request for Proposal to implement the migration to the current OneWorld XE product was issued in October 2001. The Request for Proposal adhered to established formal bidding requirements with twelve respondents submitting proposals for this service. • A panel comprised of Senior IT and Finance staff reviewed and interviewed the top five respondents in February, 2002 and conducted a second round of interviews with the two best respondents in March, 2002. • In order to facilitate the development and negotiation of project schedules, resources and commitments, staff seeks authorization to enter negotiations and subsequently award an agreement for these needed services. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The implementation services will not exceed $1,300,000. The total project budget is $2,225,000. This agreement is an anticipated expense and there is sufficient funding for this agreement. The $1,300,000 amount represents the $950,000 for the proposed implementation contract plus contingency. Contingency funding is requested due to the unforeseen cost of implementing necessary business process improvements discovered during the business process re-engineering effort. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line Item: 2001-02 Budget Section 8,page 170 Project No.S2-64) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background In 1997, the District completed the initial Finance system needs assessment study. The report concluded that the existing Financial Information System was archaic, volatile, closed and disjointed. The report emphasized the business need to have current and reliable financial information readily available across the agency. In response to the report findings, the District competitively bid, purchased and installed a J. D. Edwards World Financial Information System. The system went live District-wide in March 1998. In July of 1998 the District purchased and started the migration to the newer J.D. Edwards OneWorld Financial System in hopes of realizing benefit from the graphical user interface and open system architecture. Business process re-engineering was also planned to be completed to address noted system shortcomings. In January 1999 the Finance portion of the system attempted to go-live, but was unable due to problems inherit in this early software release. Unfortunately due to G:WN.elOypeM��Bw,e PpnM,W WN�MOx BwNPemN RepaNUWNtem falc).snur,y.arc e.W.aa: arzaro, Page 2 version incompatibility, the Accounts Receivable software module has remained in the OneWorld environment to this day. The last attempted migration to OneWorld took place in July of 1999 and failed for many of the same reasons. No additional attempts were made during 1999 due to an agency-wide need to secure data systems prior to the year 2000 rollover. These attempts left the District in the current complicated status of both World and an older OneWodd release living coexistent as a single system. The user interface on the current system is not a true Windows Graphical User Interface (GUI) environment and therefore is not intuitive or easy to use. The system cannot easily work with other desktop programs (Microsoft Word, Excel, and the District's email software). The system has also proven hard for users to retrieve and analyze data. Lastly, the financial data is not easily available to other District systems like the existing Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS.) The Project Goals • The Project goal, as approved in the 2000/2001 budget process, is to upgrade our current system and provide a more effective and viable Financial Information System across the enterprise. • Migration to the JD Edwards OneWorld XE product will provide the District a maintainable, interoperable system capable of meeting existing and future financial data and integration requirements. • Benefits to be realized include: • Improved data access and functionality • Incorporation of necessary business process improvements • Improved user interface • Web-based self service applications More timely and relevant financial information Improved data exchange across District systems • Ability to implement additional functionality as needed. The Biding Process This migration effort specified on the RFP includes all installation, project management, application and technical consulting services necessary to complete the core Financial Information System migration to the current application release. • The request for proposal resulted in twelve viable responses. • Respondents' proposals were then judged by a panel comprised of Information Technology and Finance staff and management. • The panel rated and scored proposal based on qualifications, staffing, project organization, completeness and feasibility of approach. Pricing was deliberately omitted during this process. G:eroulaVomimBoua Weme neaau,2a@aoery ne •ec�*bsoNun IA(Q.Ssbu .aec ��.�: , Page 3 • The panel arrived at a short list of firms presenting the best ability to perform the requested implementation successfully. Proposal pricing was then revealed to narrow the selection to the five contractors brought on-site for interviews (shown on the attached evaluation and cost summaries). : Pricing for the five interviewed companies ranged from a low around $800,000 to a high of$2,700,000 with a majority between $900,000 and $1,300,000. • The two companies rated the highest after the interview processes were asked to meet with the District again to answer more detailed questions. • Moving forward from the second interview has proven troublesome since the prospective implementation partners have difficulty committing key resources and producing an acceptable schedule without a specific project start date. • The requested authorization will allow the District to set a start date and schedule that is most beneficial to the agency and existing work responsibilities. • The requested authorization enables the District to identify and secure the specific implementation team best suited to meet the unique requirements of the agency. ALTERNATIVES • Continuing to utilize our existing system as is not a viable option. • Our current IBM Operating System is no longer supported and an upgrade path is not available due to incompatibility with our current Financial Information System application. • Support for the our JD Edwards World Financial Information System is scheduled to end in January 2005 • Our current OneWorid release is already not actively supported by the software vendors customer service help desk. • As determined in the completed Needs Assessment, moving to another major Financial Information System would be substantially disruptive, prohibitively expensive and provide no better assurance of success. CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Bid S-2001-62BD Cost Summary and Evaluation Summary Budget Information Table GY➢AYY0enM10mCApnOa Pepp•�1W30 WAwe RepwYYWDA•n 14(Q.WftAx W"I Page 4 Bid S-2001-62BD Cost Summary and Evaluation Summary SPECIFICATION NO: S-2001.62BD PROJECT MANAGER: ROBERT THIEDE PROFIT OIGITIl OELORTE CONIC. BROUGHTON SYSTIME BORN OPT.2) ITO TECH TOUCHE SBI All DT LOSI QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM-INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE,INCLUDING PUBLIC 1 SECTOR 192 294 330 372 464 432 474 322 430 272 334 QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM-JDE 2 EXPERIENCE 258 288 330 364 318 332 376 252 388 350 3D2 QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM- 3 MIGRATION EXPERIENCE 288 338 376 408 400 343 400 352 408 350 336 4 STAFFING 1681 204 2581 194 258 3061 302 2341 2461 204 209 5 WORK PLANIFEASIBILITY 124 189 208 194 200 463 204 128 184 128 136 6 PROJECT ORGANIZATION 162 300 330 300 306 336 294 234 294 204 276 7 COMPLETENESS OF RESPONSE 40 71 110 Be 104 94 106 SO 92 70 58 SUB-TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE 12N 1684 1942 1920 2050 2306 21M 1602 2042 15M 1646 6 COST "B 392 224 0 112 392 2801 168 68 336 0 9 VENDOR INTERVIEW 0 0 164 0 164 244 204.8 0 115.2 0 0 TOTAL SCORE 1680 2076 2330 192D 2326 2942;$925.000 640.8 1770 2213.2 1924 1646 PROPOSAL PRICE $539.000 $795,881 $939,000 $4,308,000 $2.090,000 $790.370 $1,1BB,000 $2,657,760 $809,400 $0 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE FIS PHASE II - ONEWORLD XE MIGRATION JOB NO. SP-64 SPECIFICATION NUMBER S-2001-62BD ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED BUDGET BOARD ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET TO DATE REQUESTED TO DATE TO DATE(%) FY-02103 FY -01/02 Project Development $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 32,000 $ 58,000 $ 70,000 121% Studies/Permitting $ 44,000 $ 44,000 $ 8,000 $ 44,000 $ 60,000 136% Consultant PSA $ 74,000 $ 74,000 $ 85,000 $ 74,000 $ 90,000 122% Construction Contract $ 1,139,000 $ 1,139,000 $ 1,690.000 $ 1,139,000 $ 950,000 $ 475.000 42% Construction Administration $ 86,000 $ 86,000 $ 36,000 $ 86,000 0% Construction Inspection $ 24,000 $ 24,000 $ 24,000 $ 24,000 0% Contingency $ 400,000 $ 400.000 $ 350,000 $ 400,000 $ 350,000 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 1,825,000 $ 1,825,000 $ 2,225,000 $ 1,025,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 695,000 38% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 1,825,000 $ 1.825.000 1 $ 2,225,000 11 $ 1,825,000 1; 1,300,000 1 $ 695.000 1 38% OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date T011d of Dir. e/os/oz aze/oz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMT802-38 14 tl Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Nick Arhontes, Manager—Collection Facilities O&M and Facilities Services Divisions SUBJECT: SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN & CALDWELL CONSULTING FOR WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS (WDR) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and subsequently award a sole-source Professional Services Agreement with Brown & Caldwell Consulting providing for consulting services in connection with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's newly adopted Waste Discharge Requirements, in an amount not to exceed $700,000, for the contract period of July 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004. SUMMARY • Staff recommends retaining Brown & Caldwell to provide consulting services for the development of a WDR Compliance Plan including a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) required by the California RWQCB, Santa Ana Region, General Waste Discharge Requirements and the Monitoring and Reporting Program No. R8- 200200014. The requirements were adopted April 26, 2002. • Consulting services are required due to lack of staff availability and the need to quickly mobilize a team that is experienced with the WDR regulations that need to be developed by the District, member cities and sewering agencies. Brown & Caldwell was selected by staff because of their knowledge of the District and its member agencies, their experience on regulation development, and the belief that their staff is the most experienced and knowledgeable in this program of work. In addition, not using a sole-source consultant would prevent the District from meeting the WDR compliance schedule and require considerable staff time to conduct an RFP process that would likely result in the same consultant selection. • The intent of the WDR is to provide planning and training for staff to reduce sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs), which are a frequent occurrence in portions of Orange County. There were 250 reported SSOs in the first eight months of 2001, 31 of which closed beaches. The District averages about 20 SSOs per year due to various causes. Most SSOs are preventable by the proper operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the sewage collection system. • The OMTS Committee and Board have been briefed on these new and proposed requirements in the past and as recently on May 1, 2002 (OMTS02-33). • Staff recommends selecting Brown & Caldwell for this work to meet the Regional Board's schedule as follows. Sewer System Management Plan Time Schedule Task Completion Date Monitoring and Reporting Program No. R8-2002- Adopted April 26, 2002 0014 SSMP Development Plan and Schedule September 30, 2002 SSO Emergency Response Plan January 1, 2003 Preventative Maintenance Program June 15, 2003 Legal Authority July 30, 2004 Grease Disposal Alternatives December 30, 2004 Grease Control Pro ram December 30, 2004 Ca ac' Evaluation Jul 30. 2005 Sewer Rehabilitation Plan for Entire S ste I September 30, 2005 Final SSMP I September 30. 2005 OCSD work products developed by Brown & Caldwell such as checklists, draft plans and procedures are work products that can be used as templates for the member cities and sewering agencies to develop their WDR compliance plans that will be made available to them at no cost. • The $700,000 budget amount proposed for the next two fiscal years is made up of many task components plus a contingency for new tasks, if needed. This represents a ceiling amount and our goal is to manage the work properly and deliver the tasks under budget. Major task components for FY 02/03, including sub-tasks, are estimated as follows: Develop an SSO Response Plan $ 21,500 Begin Training Program Development $158,000 Develop OCSD Divisional Impacts Matrix $ 7,500 Develop SSMP Manual Outline $ 12,500 FOG Program Treatment facilities impacts $ 23,500 Perform full WDR/CMOM Assessment $ 31,000 Provide General Support for Program Management 36,000 Subtotal $290,000 *t\ E(d•pende�dPpn U Repa '=2& Id AWe Reprv1SL n m1e(d)from d GW ldM Page 2 Major tasks and sub-tasks planned for FY 03/04 and FY 04/05 thru 12/31/04 are estimated as follows: Continue Training Program Development $150,000 Finalize Divisional Impacts Matrix $ 7,500 SSMP Manual preparation support $ 5,000 Develop FOG Program impacts summary $ 10,000 Develop Portable Aeration study $ 25,000 Develop templates/training for EPA CMOM compliance $ 5,000 General Support for Program Management $ 24,000 Budgeted contingency for 03/04 73,500 Subtotal $300,000 Partial budget for FY 04/05 tasks $110,000 Estimated Grand Total (Through 12/31/02) $700,000 • Team strengths in the maintenance and operational areas of sewer systems, along with CMOM compliance and implementation experience, were a primary driver in the selection of the Brown & Caldwell team by other agencies. Other considerations are program approach, short ramp-up time due to client experience, knowledge, and other factors in comparison to other consulting firms now migrating from a capital facilities design background to one offering O&M services. Time is of the essence in securing a strong team that is available to assist us and able to quickly provide tools for the cities and sewering agencies they desire. • The Training Program Development deliverables are a significant effort for OCSD's field staff to co-develop and implement. Once developed, these products can be made available to the cities and sewering agencies. This will help achieve WDR compliance and are expected to also serve as a regional model for more unified training to improve efficiency and knowledge. • OCSD staff will continue to assist the member cities and sewering agencies with in- kind services for implementing a successful regional WDR compliance program. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY • Costs estimated for FY 2001-02 are estimated to be less than $95,000 • Costs estimated for FY 2002-03 are estimated at$290,000 • Costs estimates for FY 2003-04 are estimated at approximately$300,000 (including a $73,500 contingency) • Cost estimates for the first half of FY2004-05 are estimated to be $110,000. G.Mq.dWe Wft9 W Agmft PapmbllW32 WMnW RaW WwVtem INEI.&b &CeNro,E Page 3 • Cost estimates for deliverables beyond December 31, 2004 are not available until more detailed internal auditing is performed. • When detailed needs are further defined by the O&M and Engineering team, staff proposes to come back to the Board during the FY 2004-05 and FY 2005-06 budget preparation processes for extensions on this agreement. Long-term staff and support needs are not budgeted at this time and will be budgeted in future Joint Operating Budgets. • Costs for the Grease Disposal Alternatives and Grease Control Program that is being managed by the Source Control Division are excluded. • Any Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) or rehabs needed for OCSD facilities to achieve compliance will be budgeted in the CIP for Engineering projects. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Rem has been budgeted. (Line Item:Division 420 proposed FY02/03 line 109, Account 53240) ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information Rem) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • Since 1995, staff has been following the development and progress of EPA's proposed Sanitary Sewer Overflow rules commonly known as "CMOM"for Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance. The OMTS, Board and member cities and agencies staff have been informed and updated on various occasions regarding the expected impacts on our regional and local sewer systems. These regulations remain on hold at the EPA and have not been published for final public comment. • In September of 2001 the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana moved forward with Tentative Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 01-99 for General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sewage Collection Agencies in Orange County (WDR 01-99). These requirements were approved on April 26, 2002 after a public comment period as Order No R-2002-0014. • The Regional Board staff has recently made two presentations at OCSD to city and agency staff and separately to a meeting of the City Managers regarding the WDR. • The WDR includes most of the asset management provisions of EPA's CMOM program along with uniform mandatory sewer spill reporting and monitoring (water sampling) provisions. G.'rp.••k&W� 4Age NepTa1t00]B Ag W 6falheOJa Page 4 • The Collection Facilities O&M staff participates in a statewide mufti-agency _. Collection Systems Best Practices Committee of which CSDA in Sacramento is a member. Staff of CSDA has been through an exhaustive RFP process that started with 152 Firms and short-listed 13 for final proposal purposes. Brown & Caldwell was finally awarded their mufti-year agreement for"CMOM Project" services. Their project has been underway since winter 2001. Based on an overview of their selection process, it is expected that OCSD would arrive at the same selection. This would also save OCSD an estimated seven months, based on current workloads and OCSD staff availability, and at least 200 hours in OCSD team labor, based on estimates from CSDA, by not conducting a similar selection process. • Brown & Caldwell was recently selected by the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD)for a major, long-term, CMOM assignment. Like OCSD, MMSD is a regional wastewater agency with 28 separate satellite systems. It is also facing remarkably similar challenges. Five large national firths competed for this project, which could serve as a model for their entire region. OCSD O&M staff may assist with some peer review aspects of Milwaukee's project. • Because of their directly relevant expertise, Brown & Caldwell was recently retained by EPA to conduct training workshops on CMOM compliance topics for EPA regions 3 and 4. The EPA is considering expanding the same training to other EPA regions in the country. • Brown & Caldwell has also been asked by two universities, including University of California Irvine, to conduct 3-day training workshops on EPA's CMOM. ALTERNATIVES Based on current workloads, using internal staff to perform this work, other than overall program management, is not possible. Stopping work to develop an RFP and award process for this work would be inefficient and also cause the program to become behind schedule. The outcomes of an RFP process are highly likely to reach the same conclusions and select the same consultant we have now. No new highly experienced consulting teams have entered the market. CEQA FINDINGS This type of service work is exempt from CEQA. Any CIP needed as a result of this program will follow typical project steps including CEQA review, as required. ATTACHMENTS None G^M.EOYpsEZYmdfgelN ReN1s B WP RgWtl60Nlen 1410)& &GM�ellAoc Page 5 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeam,Dae To ad.of Mr. 6/6/02 6/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Rem Number _ OWS02-39 14 e Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Air Quality& Special Projects Manager SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO EXISTING MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE CONTRACT, SPECIFICATION NO. C-2002-83131), AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE, SPECIFICATION NO. C-2002-95131); FOR CORROSION AND ODOR CONTROL IN THE NEWPORT TRUNKLINE SYSTEM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve Change Order No. 1 to P.O. No. 101150, issued to Hill Brothers Chemical Company, for the Purchase of Magnesium Hydroxide Solution, Specification No. C-2002-83BD, for odor and corrosion control in the Newport Trunklines, providing for a time extension of two months (through August 31, 2002), for an additional amount not to exceed $80,000, for a total contract amount not to exceed $175,000; and 2. Authorize the General Manager to competitively bid and subsequently award the Purchase of Magnesium Hydroxide Solution, Specification No. C-2002-95BD, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for a total amount not to exceed $493,000, including a 20% contingency amount of$83,000, for the period September 1, 2002 through August 31, 2003, with two one-year renewal options to include a 10% annual cost escalation. SUMMARY • Staff recommends Board authorization for chemical treatment that will improve the protection of 8 miles of the Newport trunklines and force mains by further reducing the production of hydrogen sulfide that will reduce pipeline corrosion and sewer odors in the community and Treatment Plant No. 2. • in February 2002, the Board authorized a contract with Hills Brothers Chemical Company to demonstrate and optimize the usage of magnesium hydroxide in the Newport Trunklines. The magnesium hydroxide chemical addition has proven to be an effective chemical treatment for the pipelines. Due to delays in startup of this demonstration testing, staff is requesting a 2-month extension of this contract to complete the demonstration testing, an increase in present contract cost t provide chemicals for 2 more months, and to allow time to competitively bid a subsequent 1- year contract for magnesium hydroxide. w • The District's current odor and sulfide control program for the Newport trunklines consists of periodic slug dosing with caustic soda, which does not provide complete or continuous protection of the trunklines. • Staff has done field research to select appropriate chemicals for collection trunk sewer application. Implementing continuous chemical treatment using magnesium hydroxide was determined to be best treatment approach for this trunkline, due to the demonstrated treatment effectiveness of the chemical and the ability to safely install the chemical feed equipment in the limited space available at the Bay Bridge pump station. A lower cost chemical treatment approach was not selected for application at this location due to the safety and siting concerns. • Odor and sulfide control research conducted on the Newport Trunkline resulted in 3 chemicals being short-listed for future consideration. The estimated annual cost for treatment of the Newport Trunklines from the previously conducted staff research with the 3 chemicals is: Magnesium Hydroxide: $410,000 Ferrous Chloride & Hydrogen Peroxide: $370,000 Calcium Nitrate (Bioxide): $500,000 • Treatment with magnesium hydroxide will protect 8 miles of sewer from further corrosion and will result in the elimination of odor complaints downstream of the chemical injection point under normal operations. The proposed $410,000 annual expenditure will be partially offset by present annual chemical costs in the Newport Trunkline and in the treatment plant of$320,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The General Manager is seeking Board approval to amend the magnesium hydroxide solution contract to Hill Brothers Chemical Company, by an estimated amount not to exceed $80,000, increasing the total contract not to exceed $175,000; which includes the cost of chemicals, chemical feed equipment installation and removal and monitoring. The General Manager is also seeking Board approval to bid and subsequently award a 1-year contract to the lowest responsive bidder for purchase of magnesium hydroxide solution for chemical treatment in the Newport Trunkline System, for an estimated amount not to exceed $493.000. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 62) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) G 1vq.EaUgenOd�Pg OReynS = W9 Hymnde Mc Re„. MM, Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As part of a continuing effort to improve the collection system odor and corrosion control program, the District evaluated in the summers of 2000 and 2001, the odor control treatment effectiveness of 6 chemicals in 4 of our 11 trunklines. These 4 trunklines produce approximately 75% of the odorous and corrosive chemical hydrogen sulfide. These trunklines are the Miller-Holder, Knott, Newport and Baker-Gisler. The results of the study showed that 3 of the 6 chemicals tested would be good candidates for odor and corrosion control in the 4 sewer trunk lines evaluated, based upon their ability to treat to desired levels. These 3 chemicals are calcium nitrate (Bioxide), magnesium hydroxide and a combination of ferrous chloride/hydrogen peroxide. Of these 3 chemicals tested, the ferrous chloride/hydrogen peroxide combination was the most cost-effective alternative and is therefore being recommended for continuous treatment in the Miller-Holder, Knott and Baker-Gisler trunklines. It is not being recommended for treatment in the Newport Trunkline because of its potentially hazardous properties if a spill occurred due to the particularly tight chemical siting concerns at the Bay Bridge pump station. There are several chemical suppliers that provide magnesium hydroxide solution or blends of magnesium and calcium solutions for controlling hydrogen sulfide. Therefore, Staff is recommending that we competitively bid a 1-year contract for treatment of hydrogen sulfide following completion of the demonstration testing in August. This contract period will be from September 1, 2002 to August 31, 2003. ALTERNATIVES Alternatives include continuing with our existing caustic soda slug dosing treatment in the collection system. This option will result in continued odor complaints and further corrosion to the system that could lead to future structural failures of the trunklines in these systems. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None EMT:hh/pjm G\rq.EleNOenEeBwm A,..ReµrLv N2& WA .R.,.,O8MT tdla)WBrwaNm HYEmuEe Eoc Page 3 OMTS COMMIT-FEEMeeting Date Toatl.ofDir. 6/5/02 6/26102 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMT502-40 14(t) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Air Quality& Special Projects Manager SUBJECT: AWARD OF SOLE SOURCE CONTRACT FOR TRUNKLINE CHEMICAL TREATMENT STRATEGY IN THE MILLER-HOLDER, KNOTT AND BAKER-GISLER TRUNKLINES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and award a sole source contract with US Peroxide, Inc., for a one-year demonstration of a proprietary chemical process consisting of ferrous chloride and hydrogen peroxide treatment for odor and corrosion control in the Miller-Holder, Knott and Baker-Gisler trunklines, for the period August 1, 2002 through July 31, 2003, for an estimated amount not to exceed $2,434,000 which includes a contingency amount of$116,000. SUMMARY • Staff recommends Board authorization for a chemical treatment system that will improve the protection of 44 miles of three trunk sewers that generate most of the chemical hydrogen sulfide. The new chemical treatment will significantly reduce the present 75 collection system odor complaints and protect the sewers' concrete surfaces from corrosion repair that has averaged $1,000,000 annually. The proposed chemical purchase contract will be for a one-year demonstration of the most cost-effective chemical system that staff have researched to date, providing improved corrosion protection and odor control for three of the District's four trunk sewers. The District's current collection system odor and sulfide control program consists of periodic slug dosing with caustic soda, which does not provide complete or continuous protection of the trunklines. • In the summer of 2000, Staff evaluated the treatment effectiveness and cost of 5 chemicals for controlling collection system odors and corrosion. In addition, the Board authorized in June 2001, a contract with US Peroxide Inc. to evaluate a new, proprietary chemical process for controlling odors and corrosion using ferrous chloride and hydrogen peroxide. • The results from these evaluations were 3 chemicals being short-listed for further consideration. The estimated annual cost of chemicals for treatment of 3 trunklines (Miller-Holder, Knott and Baker-Gisler) is: ti Ferrous Chloride & Hydrogen Peroxide: $1,700,000 Magnesium Hydroxide: $4,200,000 Calcium Nitrate (Bioxide): $2,800,000 • Staff recommends treatment with the ferrous chloride and hydrogen peroxide because it can achieve the Districts odor and corrosion control goals and is the most cost-effective treatment option. Implementing this treatment approach should eliminate up to 50 of the 75 odor complaints received annually in the collection system, extend the useful fife of the sewers by reducing corrosion along 44 miles of sewer pipe and offset chemical caustic soda dosing in the trunkline system and hydrogen peroxide treatment as the trunkline enters both treatment plants. The estimated annual chemical cost of$1,700,000 for the proposed chemical addition system will be offset by the cost of the chemicals presently added to the sewer and plant that cost $1,300,000. • US Peroxide has developed the innovative approach to control sulfides and odors using hydrogen peroxide to regenerate the ferrous chloride. A patent is currently pending. Therefore, staff is recommending a sole source contract with US Peroxide. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The General Manager is seeking Board approval to award a contract for a 1-year demonstration of ferrous chloride/hydrogen peroxide to US Peroxide Inc., for an estimated total project cost amount not to exceed $2,434,000. The contract costs include the cost of chemicals, chemical feed equipment installation and removal, and monitoring of Chemical inventory in the chemical dosing tanks. Also one-time costs estimated at $358,000 are included for monitoring of treatment performance, optimization of chemical dosing locations and feed rates, evaluation of potential plant chemical credits and project management. Because this is application of new technology, a contingency of$115,000 is also included. A breakdown of the project costs is provided below: Ferrous Chloride/Hydrogen Peroxide Demonstration Description Estimated Cost Chemicals $1,700,000 Chemical Dosing Stations 6 $ 151,000 Sales tax on chemicals & Dosing Stations $ 141,000 Monitoring & Optimization $ 162,000 Equipment& Expenses $ 66,000 Plant Credits Evaluation $ 40,000 Project Management& Reporting $ 90,000 Project Contingency $ 116,000 Total $2,434,000 G:MrpAbbgenftWB Fd Aqm PeP QW2e d Agw"RepoM1SN M=14m.us Pe, ded rt W;WMI Page 2 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (tine item: 62) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As part of a continuing effort to improve the collection system odor and corrosion control program, the District evaluated in the summers of 2000 and 2001, the odor control treatment effectiveness of 6 chemicals in 4 of our 11 trunklines. These 4 trunklines produce approximately 75% of the odorous and corrosive chemical hydrogen sulfide. These trunklines are the Miller-Holder, Knott, Newport and Baker-Gisler. The results of the study showed that 3 of the 6 chemicals tested would be good candidates for odor and corrosion control in the 4 sewer trunk lines evaluated, based upon their ability to treat to desired levels. These 3 chemicals are calcium nitrate (Bioxide), magnesium hydroxide and combination of ferrous chloride/hydrogen peroxide. Of these 3 chemicals, the ferrous chloride/hydrogen peroxide combination was the most cost-effective alternative and is therefore being recommended for continuous treatment in the Miller-Holder, Knott and Baker-Gisler trunklines. It is not being recommended for treatment in the Newport Trunkline because of the chemical siting concerns at the Bay Bridge Pump station. A separate Agenda Report has been prepared requesting funds to conduct odor and corrosion control liquid treatment in the Newport Trunkline using magnesium hydroxide. Chemical Treatment Treatment Cost of 3 Plant Trunklines Offsets Net Cost $/ $/ r. Ferrous Chloride 1,700.000 1.300,000 400,000 & Hydrogen Peroxide Magnesium 4,200,000 350,000 3.850.000 Hydroxide Tested Dosa e ,800,000 Bioxide 2 1,300,000 11,500,000 Note: Cost comparison is for chemicals only and excludes sales tax and chemical dosing system costs Qlld�r ma eepdtl1 a Wngmaz R¢pxlsldBOZJIem INOM5 a ftAm e. : ate, Page 3 ll ALTERNATIVES Alternatives include continuing with our existing caustic soda slug dosing treatment in the collection system. This option will not assist in the reduction of the present level of odor complaints and will cause further corrosion to the system, which could lead to future structural failures of the trunklines in these systems. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None EMT:hh/pim G:wneuupenae,meNnoeme neeon W=a A Owom Wem 1440.us remem.aoc aedaea: arzom, Page 4 { DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: John Linder, Construction Manager Steve Anderson, Chair Jim Herberg, Interim Engineering Manager Russell Patterson, Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Laurann Cook Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Alice Jempsa Larry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor Jerry Sigler Chris Cervellone, Construction Management Beth Krom Supervisor Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair Mark Esquer, O&M Engineering Manager Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Directors Absent: Andrei loan, Project Manager Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Mike Alvarez OTHERS PRESENT: Randy Fuhrman Irwin Haydock Don McGee Eileen Murphy Larry Porter Joseph Racano Dr.Jack Skinner Nancy Skinner Morris Ying (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM It was not necessary to appoint a Chair pro tem. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Joseph Racano, Larry Porter, Don McGee, Eileen Murphy and Randy Fuhrman all spoke against the waiver. Dr.Jack Skinner spoke on DHS requirements for an aeration treatment of water for reuse. PDC Committee Minutes ' Page 2 >I June 6, 2002 Chair Steve Anderson suggested that Dr. Skinner provide the information to the GW RS Joint Coordinating Committee at its next meeting on June 10. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Steve Anderson announced the special Board Meeting on June 19 beginning at 6 p.m. to receive information on the strategic plan update. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present to make a report. Gary Streed, acting General Manager, reassured the Directors that Blake would return on Monday (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin was not present. John Linder updated the Committee on the status of the Bitter Point Pump Station and explained the repair work done since last year and the results of the videotaping of the three lines entering the station. The southerly line is in need of repair because the liner is separating from the pipe. Staff will be contacting the manufacturer of this pipe. Director Patterson asked about the status of other lines that are constructed with this same type of pipe. A report will be presented to the Committee in August. (7) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not present to make a report. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present to make a report. (9) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-n) Chair Anderson requested that Items f, g, h, i and j be pulled from the consent calendar and asked staff to include rates and percentage of increases before sending the items to the Board for approval. a. RECEIVE. FILE, AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the May 2, 2002 Planning, Design,and Construction Committee meeting. b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached are the Monthly and Quarterly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an information only item. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There is one change order this month for PDC Committee approval. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 June 6, 2002 C. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORTS Attached are the PSA and Addenda Report. This is an information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There were no PSAs and one Addendum approved by the General Manager from February 21 through March 21, 2002. d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only item. k. P00O2-37 Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 10 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I,J, K, L, M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2- 39, with Margate Construction,authorizing an addition of$107,027 and a time extension of 63 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $10,782,595. I. PDCO2-38 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Approve a budget amendment of $243,204 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No.J- 66, for a total budget of$1,982,281;and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No.2, Job No.J-66,with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of$243,204 and a time extension of 126 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,362,281. M. PDCO2-39 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget amendment of $94,036 for Junction Structure Upgrade,Job No. SP2000-29, for a total budget of$566,236; (2) Ratify Change Order No.2 to Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000.29, with Mike Prlich and Sons, authorizing an addition of $37,483.03 and a time extension of 168 days, increasing the total contract amount to$389,736;and (3)Accept Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. n. P00O2-40 Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No.J-33-lA, with Southern Contracting Company, authorizing an addition of$151,081, increasing the contract amount to$6,480,081. This Change Order is for PDC approval per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 June 6, 2002 END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: It was moved,seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 9(a)through (a)and (k)through (n)under Consent Calendar. (10) ACTION ITEM (Items a-e) a. PDCO2-41 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Receive and file plans and specifications for Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1,Job No.J-90, and(2)Authorize the General Manager to award a contract to the lowest bidder for an amount not to exceed the engineer's estimate of$1,675,000. MOVED,SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Receive and file plans and specifications for Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1,Job No.J-90, and (2)Authorize the General Manager to award a contract to the lowest bidder for an amount not to exceed the engineer's estimate of$1,675,000. b. PDCO2.42 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No.2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services, for Space Allocation& Interior Renovation, Job No.J-84, providing for additional conceptual design work for an additional amount of$34,200, increasing the total amount not to exceed$463,000. MOVED,SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No.2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services,for Space Allocation & Interior Renovation,Job No. J-84, providing for additional conceptual design work for an additional amount of$34,200, increasing the total amount not to exceed $463,000. Director Alice Jempsa opposed the action. C. PDCO2-43 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No.3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.,for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2,Job No.J-35-2, providing for Construction Support Services in the amount of $965,264,for a total amount not to exceed $3,270,744. MOVED,SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc., for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35.2, providing for Construction Support Services In the amount of$965,264, for a total amount not to exceed $3,270,744. y PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 June 6, 2002 d. PDCO2-44 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, providing for additional engineering services,authorizing staff to reallocate funds for an amount not to exceed$980,000, with no increase in the total amount of $3,807,047. This action is to move funds between tasks with no change in price. The Directors asked for an update on the status of the SAW PA invoices. MOVED,SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No.2-41, providing for additional engineering services, authorizing staff to reallocate funds for an amount not to exceed $980,000, with no increase in the total amount of$3,807,047. e. PDCO2-45 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve plans and specifications for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addenda Nos. 1,2, 3, and 4 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file letter dated May 14,2002 from Colich & Sons, L.P., the apparent low bidder, requesting to be relieved from their bid due to a mathematical error, (4)Approve the request of Colich & Sons, L.P.for release from their bid; (5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (6)Award a construction contract to Steve P. Rados, Inc.for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4,for an amount not to exceed $30,003,210. MOVED,SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve plans and specifications for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation,Job No. 1-2-4, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3,and 4 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file letter dated May 14, 2002 from Colich& Sons, L.P.,the apparent low bidder, requesting to be relieved from their bid due to a mathematical error; (4)Approve the request of Colich & Sons, L.P.for release from their bid; (5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (6) Award a construction contract to Steve P. Rados, Inc.for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4,for an amount not to exceed$30,003,210. (11) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items a-b) a. PDCO2-46 Secondary Treatment Capacity At a previous PDC Committee meeting Chair Anderson requested a report on the amount of secondary treatment capacity available at this time. Mark Esquer, O&M Engineering Manager, described the current operating capacity and available standby capacity and the three processes involved in this level of treatment. At this time there is an operational capacity of 155 mgd and flows are averaging about 240 mgd. This secondary capacity exceeds the current PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 June 6, 2002 philosophy of providing 50/50 blend of primary and secondary treatment. However, because of mechanical maintenance and equipment needs, not all of that capacity is available for use. There are plans to rehabilitate the trickling filters and that will further reduce capacity for a short time. He also reported on research projects that are underway to look at increasing capacity through the various processes. By 2007,200 mgd of secondary treatment capacity should be available. Staff will report back to the Committee on how soon we can get to full capacity and the cost. b. PDCO2-47 2002-03 Joint Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget Updates Gary Streed made a presentation on the proposed 2002-03 Joint Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets. The final budget will be presented to the Directors for approval at the June 26 Board meeting after it is reviewed by the FAHR Committee. The increase over the 2001-02 budget is about 25.4%, including disinfection. Mr. Stread reviewed the changes and explained the increases. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Director Jerry Sigler asked for an update on the flow monitoring program. Jim Herberg provided a quick update and indicated that when there is enough information to evaluate where the problems are a report will be made to the Committee. However, because this past wet weather season was one of the driest on record, it has served as an excellent baseline year for comparison purposes in future years. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Chair Anderson asked that the wording for Item (1) be revised before going to the Board to include a discussion on the money saved by changing the design. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, August 1, 2002 at 5 p.m. There will be no meeting in July because of the Fourth of July holiday. a PDC Committee Minutes Page 7 June 6, 2002 (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Submitted by: ✓a' Cc, PVC J a appan Committee Secretary owm.me�mawoazoozmunme.eaoem mm cx wn W r.aoc 1 PDC COMMITTEE M-ongDae ToeaofIN- biaioz wzwoz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number yDCO2-32 15(d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR MATERIALS TESTING AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-33BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Law/Crandall and Ninyo & Moore, to provide for Materials Testing, Inspection, and Geotechnical Engineering Service, Specification No. PSA-2001-3313D, for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for each agreement ($260,000 total). SUMMARY In May 2001 the Board of Directors approved Professional Services Agreements (PSA)with Law/Crandall and Ninyo & Moore for Fiscal Year(FY) 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for each agreement ($260,000 total)for FY 2002/2003, and $100,000 for each agreement($200,000 total)for FY 2003/2004. Staff has determined that a one-year renewal is required to successfully complete materials testing, inspection, and geotechnical engineering services on capital projects during the next fiscal year. The PSA amounts for each consultant will be used on an as-needed basis. Testing services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All services will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The PSA renewal amounts with each consultant for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 are listed in the table below. The amounts were Board-approved last year and derived by staff by considering average testing hours of past years along with present testing and geotechnical fees and scheduled future capital projects. G\wy.UlstpenpelBoazp Agen4a gepcgsQ.29 NpgeMagepMs`GWNiem fSIcILew CnnEylUx R-. �M Page 1 T Consultant FY 02-03 Law/Crandall $130,000 Nino & Moore $130,000 TOTAL $260,000 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Materials testing and geotechnical services funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Fee Schedule with Escalation Rates MB:lc c:wy.ammea�ea�eora Aoenm nap QOO2 mrd AwdO aeponswwznem 1X0 U.CrenWl c« Rewa : WOW Page 2 SOILS. MATERIALS TESTING: NINYO & MOORE FEES A. Lab Testing Fees _ All-inclusive Unit Prices 7/l/01 -6/30/02 7/1/02-6/30/03 711/03-6/30/04 Al S099 AA.1 Ma)dmum Density: $140.00 $142.80 $145.66 A.1.2 Sieve Anal $95.00 $96.90 $98.84 A.1.3 Sal identification: $126.00 $127.50 $130.05 A WI and Concrete A.2.1 Concrete Compressive Strength: $19.00 $19.38 $19.77 A22 Shear Test on Brick Cores: $125.00 $127.50 $130.05 A.2.3 Mortar/Grout Compression Test: $19.00 $19.38 $19.77 A.2.4 Masonry Prism Test: $90.00 $91.80 $93.64 Ai-Asp-halt A.3.1 Core Sample Testing: $75.00 $76.50 $78.03 A.4 Metals A.4.1 Tensile Strength: $42.00 $42.84 $43.70 (Escalation rate for Lab Testing Fees=2%per year) B. Field Service Fees All-Inclusive Hourly Rates 7/1/01 -6/30/02 7/1102-6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30/04 B.1 Soils B.1.1 Compaction Testing/Inspection: $70.00 $71.40 $72.83 B.2 Mason and Concrete B.2.1 Test Specimen Pick-Up Unit Rate): $45.00 $46.90 $46.82 8.3 Asphalt B.3.1 Compaction InspectionfOlensilly Test: $70.00 $71.40 $72.83 BA Metals B.4.1 Welding Inspection: $70.00 $71.40 $72.83 B.4.2 Dye Penetrant Testing: $75.00 $76.50 $78.03 B.4.3 Ultrasonic Testing: $75.00 $76.50 $78.03 (Escala on rate for Field Service Fees=2%per year) C. Other Fees 711/01 -6/30/02 7/l/02- 6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30/04 C.1 Travel Time/Mileage Charge for Field $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Work and Test Specimen Pick-Up: C.2 Minimum Dail Call-Out Charge: 4 hours 4 hours 4 hours C.3 Soils Sampling with Truck- $225.00/hour $229.50 $234.09 Mounted Auger. CA Licensed Senior Geolechnical En r. $123.00 $125.46 $127.97 (Escalation rates for hems CA and CA=2%per year) ,r SOILS MATERIALS TESTING: LAW/CRANDALL FEES l 1 A. Lab Testing Fees All-Inclusive Unit Prices 7/1/01 -6130/02 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1/03- 6130/04 .1 Soil A:1.1 Mapmum Density: $140.00 $142.80 $145.66 A.1.2 Sieve Analysis: $80.00 $81.60 $83.23 A.1.3 Soil Identification: $175.00 $178.50 $182.07 A 2 Masonry and Concrete A.2.1 Concrete Compressive Strength: $17.00 per test $17.34 $17.69 A.22 Shear Test on Brick Cores: $110.00 $112.20 $114.44 A.2.3 Mortar/Grout Compression Test: $22.00 $22." $22.89 A.2.4 Masonry Prism Test: $225.00 $229.50 $234.09 42 AsPhaff A.3.1 Core Sample Testing: $50.00 $51.00 $52.02 AI Metals A.4.1 Tensile Strength: $66.00 $66.30 $67.63 (Escalation rate for Lab Testing Feas=2%per year) B. Field Service Fees All-Inclusive Hourly Rates 7/1/01 -6/30/02 7/1/02-6130103 7/1103-6/30104 B.1 Soils B.1.1 Compaction Testing/inspection: $65.00 $66.30-$67.60 $67.63-$70.30 B.2 Masonry and Concrete B.2.1 Test Specimen Pick-Up(Unit Rate): $50.00 $51.00 -$52.00 $52.02 .64.08 B.3 Asphalt B.3.1 Compaction Inspection/Density Test: $66.00 $66.30-$67.60 $67.63 .$70.30 AA ALetals B.4.1 Welding Inspection: $65.00 $66.30 -$67.60 $67.63 -$70.30 B.4.2 Dye Penetrant Testing: $65.00 $66.30-$67.60 $67.63-$70.30 B.4.3 Ultrasonic Testin : $72.00 $73.44-$74.88 $74.91 -$77.88 (Escalation rates for Field Service Fees range from 2%to max.4%per year,in accordance with prev.wage Increases) C. Other Fees 7/1/01 -6/30/02 7/l/02-6/30/03 7/l/03-6/30/04 CA Travel TrmelMileage Charge for Field $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Work and Test Specimen Pick-Up: C.2 Minimum Daily Call-Out Charge: 4 hours 4 hours 4 hours C.3 Soils Sampling with Truck- _ Mounted Auger. CA Licensed Senior Geotechnical Engr. $139.00 $141.78 $144.62 (Escalation rate for Lira Sr.GeoL Engineer=2%per year) PDC COMMITTEE Mewing Date Toad.of Dir. 6/06/02 6R6/02 AGENDA REPORT IPD Item Number PDCO2-3302-33 16(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR MATERIALS TESTING AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2002-33BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with Smith-Emery GeoServices for Materials Testing and Geotechnical Engineering Services, Specification No. PSA-2002-3313D, for an amount not to exceed $130,000 for a one-year period effective July 1, 2002, with the option to renew for one additional year for an amount not to exceed $100,000. SUMMARY Capital projects require materials testing and geotechnical engineering consultation services for successful construction of the projects. Material testing services include soils, concrete, asphalt, and metals testing. Geotechnical engineering services may be required when unexpected or unusual soil conditions arise. Geotechnical consultants have traditionally provided these services for the District. The Board approved Professional Services Agreements (PSA) in May 2001 with Ninyo & Moore, Law/Crandall, and Converse Consultants to provide materials testing and geotechnical engineering services to the District. Subsequently, Converse Consultants was not able to meet insurance requirements and was not awarded a PSA. The next highest rated consultant qualified to provide testing services per the original staff evaluation is Smith- Emery GeoServices. The Professional Services Agreement will be structured to cover the July 2002/2003 period, with the option for renewal for one additional one-year period at District's discretion. G W,Atal WadarBoard Agenda addenffi002 Board Agenda ReNnsWfi 2%eam 15(d),Smin Errery d. F.Nfed eagree Page 1 The proposed yearly Professional Services Agreement (PSA) amount will be used on an as-needed basis. Funds remaining at the end of the year will not carry over to the following one-year period. Services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All testing and geotechnical engineering services will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Amounts as shown in the table below are PSA allocations for the next two years, starting in July 2002. The Board previously approved the PSA amounts in May 2001. Staff derived the numbers by considering average testing hours of past years along with present testing and geotechnical fees and scheduled future capital projects. Consultant 02103 03104 2-Year Total Smith-Emery $130,000 $100,000 $230,000 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Materials testing and geotechnical services funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In February 2001, the District solicited proposals from the following consulting firms: • Smith-Emery GeoServices • Ninyo & Moore • Converse • PSI • NMG Geotechnical • MTGL • Harrington Geotechnical • Leighton & Associates • Law/Crandall • Levine Fricke GAVAWregendal d Agentla Rado-S002 Board AWW ReadnSW60SIM Errrycrd Re Wed: 6¢n19e Page 2 Eight consultants responded, and District staff selected three of those firms for recommendation to the Board of Directors. Six District staff members evaluated the proposals in reference to the following evaluation factors: • Layout of a plan for task performance and handling of requirements (point score) • Applicable consultant staff qualifications (point score) • Related service experience (point score) • Prior work experience with the consultants • Proposed fees Staff recommended Ninyo & Moore, Law/Crandall, and Converse Consultants to provide services to the District. These three firms received the highest evaluation point scores and were ranked the highest with all evaluation factors considered. Smith-Emery GeoServices received a fourth-place ranking. This company has competitive fees and a positive prior work relationship with the District. When Converse Consultants failed to qualify for a Professional Services Agreement, Smith-Emery was the next candidate for the third testing agreement. ALTERNATIVES New Requests for Proposals could be sent out to several qualified consultants. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Fee Schedule with Escalation Rates MB:lc GAxpC 9tl ft\Bw,C A9m0 WpH•1'aoz emNngenm aeponsN9031umm ulalsmYn bren<x �. d: MOM Page 3 SOILS. MATERIALS TESTING: SMITH-EMERY FEE SCHEDULE A. Lab Testing Fees All-Inclusive Unit Prices Pick-U ,each 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30/04 A.1 Soils A.1.1 Maximum Density: N/C $100.00 $100.00 A.1.2 Sieve Analysis: N/C $50.00 $50.00 A.1.3 Soil Identification: N/C $100.00 $100.00 .2 Masawy and Concrete A.2.1 Concrete Compressive Strength: $10.00 $14.00 $14.00 A.2.2 Shear Test on Brick Cores: $9.00 $50.00 $50.00 A.2.3 Mortar/Grout Compression Test: $10.00 $19.00/$25.00 $19.00/$25.00 A.2.4 Masonry Prism Test: $39.00 $144.00 $144.00 A!Asphalt A.3.1 Core Sample Testing: $40.00 $36.00 $35.00 A.4 Metals A.4.1 Tensile Slren h: $19.00 $28.00 $28.00 (Esoalauon ale for Lab Teseng Fees a 0%) B. Field Service Fees All-Inclusive Hourly Rates 7/1102-6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30/04 Alsoils B.1.1 Compaction Testing/inspection: Esc. Rate: 2% $55.50 $56.61 B.2 Mason and Concrete B.2.1 Test Specimen Pick-Up Unit Rate): see above see above B.3 Asphalt B.3.1 Compaction Inspection/Density, Test: Esc.Rafe: 2% $55.50 $56.61 B.4 Metals B.4.1 Welding Inspection: Esc.Rate: 3% $65.00 $66.95 B.4.2 Dye Penetrant Testing: Eec.Rate: 3% $69.00 $71.07 B.4.3 Ultrasonic Testing: Ess.Rate: 3% $69.00 $71.07 C. Other Fees 7/1/02 -6/30/03 711/03-6/30/04 CA Travel Time/Mileage Charge for Field included in fees included in fees Work and Test Specimen Pick-UP: above above C.2 Minimum Daily Call-Out Charge: 2 hrs 2 hrs C.3 Soils Sampling with Truck- $14.00/foot+ $14.00/foot+ Mounted Auger. Esc. Rate: 0% $70.001hour $70.00/hour CA Licensed Senior Geotechnical En r. Esc. Rate: 2% $80.00/hour $81.60 PDC COMMITTEE Meeln'Da[e To".o02 ror. AGENDA REPORT "PnNwn 1eiiNinhef P0002-39 rXe1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR SURVEYING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-34BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreements with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush &Associates, to provide for Surveying Services, Specification No. PSA-2001-34BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $170,000 for each agreement ($510,000 total). SUMMARY In May 2001, the Board of Directors approved Professional Services Agreements (PSA)with Bell Land Surveying, MDS Consulting, and Bush & Associates for Fiscal Year(FY) 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $ 170,000 for each agreement($510,000 total)for FY 2002/2003, and $95,000 for each agreement ($285,000 total)for FY 2003/2004. Staff has determined that a one-year renewal is required to successfully complete surveying services on capital projects during the next fiscal year. The PSA amounts for each consultant will be used on an as-needed basis. Surveying services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All services will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The PSA renewal amounts with each consultant for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 are listed in the table below. The amounts were Board-approved last year and derived by staff by considering average survey hours of past years along with present survey fees and scheduled future capital projects. G FYp auagnga8w,a PgN.Y NepCnS3Po3 BoirO ngmW ReMa'UWN,em,s�e)&II una Ec[ na.>aa: a2o�o Page 1 Consultant FY 02/03 Bell Land Survey. $170,000 MDS Consulting $170,000 'Bush &Assoc. $170,000 TOTAL $510 000 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Surveying funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Fee Schedule with Escalation Rates MB:Ic G Wy.EUNBenEalBm,E A,.M Repp W.0 BmrO A,e .Rep IOHJVI..15(0 Bdl Uan A. Mo., W.W Page 2 SURVEY SERVICES: BELL LAND SURVEYING FEES 7/1101 -6I30/02 7/1/02-6/30/03 711/03-6130104 Lie. Surveyor $100.00 $102.00 $104.04 2-Part Crew $166.00 $168.30 $171.67 3-Part Crew $225.00 $229.50 $234.09 Office Calcs 1 $90.00 $91.80 $93.64 CAD Draftsperson $90.00 $91.80 $93.64 Min. hrs 0 0 0 per Callouf Travel Charge Std. Rates Std.Rates Std.Rates Max.Esc. Rate 02/03 2% 2% Max.Esc. Rate 03I04 PLS with robotic $160.00 $153.00 $166.06 station Other Other Nate:Escalation retes of 2%were used to calculate rates for FY MM,OWN.as specified by Bell SURVEY SERVICES: MDS CONSULTING FEES 7/1/01 -6/30102 7/1/02-6/30/03 711103-6130/04 Lic.Surye or $90.00 $93.60 $97.34 2-Part Crew $160.00 $156.00 $162.24 3-Part Crew $180.00 $187.20 $194.69 Office Calcs $75.00 $78.00 $81.12 CAD Draftsperson $60.00 $62.40 $64.90 Min. hrs perCalloul 2 2 2 Travel Charge $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Max.Esc. Rate 02N3 4% Me .Esc. Rate 03/04 4% Other Other Other We:Es Jatian rates of 4%were used to ulculah rates for FY 04/03,03104,as spwfb d by MDS SURVEY SERVICES: BUSH&ASSOCIATES FEES 7/1/01 -6/30/02 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1103-6/30/04 Uc. Surveyor $74.00 $75.11 $76.24 2-Party Crew $136.00 $138.04 $140.11 3-Party Crew $176.00 $178.64 $191.32 Office Calm $58.00 $58.87 $59.75 CAD Draftsperson $62.00 $52.78 $63.57 0.5 OS OS Min. hrs per Callout Travel Charge $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Max-Esc. Rate 02/03 1.5% Max.E . Rate 03104 1.5% sc Other Other Other Note:EscaMan rya of 1.5%ware used to oakadtle rams far FY 02M.0304.a spedfied by Bush PDC COMMITTEE MeetlngOste foadofDir. 6/O6/02 61 i6/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number ItemNumbe PDCO2-35 15(f) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Bock, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL ACCEPTANCE TESTING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. PSA-2001-35BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Electro Test Inc., to provide Electrical Acceptance Testing Services, Specification No. PSA-2001-35BD, for a one-year period for an amount not to exceed $150,000. SUMMARY In May 2001, the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement(PSA) with Electro Test Inc. for Fiscal Year(FY) 2001/2002, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods for an amount not to exceed $150,000 for FY 02/03, and $175,000 for FY 03/04. Staff has determined that a one-year renewal is required to successfully complete electrical acceptance testing on capital projects during the next fiscal year. The PSA amount of$150,000 will be used on an as-needed basis. Electrical acceptance testing services are budgeted on each capital project as required. All testing will be charged to the project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The PSA renewal amount with Electro Test Inc. for Fiscal Year 02/03 is shown in the table below. The amount was Board-approved last year and derived by staff by considering average testing hours of past years along with present electrical testing fees and scheduled future capital projects. Consultant FY 02103 Electro Test $150,000 G:Wq.04WjeMaV30e,tl FOsW RC{v 002 emN PyeMs ReVMt�.I3QElaV TWA. R"W: � Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) This item does not impact the overall budget because it is not paid separately as a lump sum item. Electrical testing funds have been included in the individual project budgets that require these services. They are expensed as the services are used on the projects. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Fee Schedule with Escalation Rates MB:lc G WyMN�PpenL FeC Q=B M ApenN Repwb�V.15(0,0Wa Tm1.O% Re...:aaM Page 2 v ELECTRICAL TESTING: ELECTRO-TEST, INC. FEES Tasks and Fee Schedule - All Inclusive Hourly Rates - 7/1101 -6/30/02 7/1102-6/30/03 ' 711/03-6/30/04 7.1 Switchgear and Switchboard Inspection and Assemblies $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 Test Procedum - 7.2.1.1 Dry Type Transformer $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 7.21.2 Air-Cooled Transformer $103.60 $109.25 '$115.00' 7.22 Uquid-Filled Trnsformers $103.50 $109.25 1 $115.00: 7.5.1.1 Low Voltage Air Switches $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 7.5.1.2 Medium Voltage Air $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 Switches 7.5.1.3 High Voltage Air Switches $103.60 $109.25 $116.00 7.5.2 Medium Voltage Oil Switches $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 7.6.1.1 Insulated Case/Molded Case $101.50 $109.25 $115:00 Circuit Breakers 7.6.1.2 Power Circuit Breaker $103.50 $109.25 $116.00 7.6.2.1 Medium Voltage Air $103.50 $109.25 $116.00. 7.6.2.2 Medium Voltage Oil $103.50 $109.25 $115,00 7.6.2.3 Medium Voltage Vacuum $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 7.6.2.4 Medium Voltage SFs $103.60 $109.25 $115.00 7.9 Protective Relays $103.50 $109.26 $115.00 7.10 lnstrmenlTrnsformers $103.50 $109.25 $115.00. 7.11 Motoring $103.50 $109.25 $115.00' 7.13 Grounding Systems $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 7.14 Ground-Fault Protection $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 Systems 7.15.1.1 AC Motor $103.50 $109.25 -$115.00` 7.15.1.2 DC Motor $103.50 $10925 $115.00: 7.18.1.1 Low Voltage Motor Starters $1035.50 $109.25 $115:00 7.10.1.2 Medium Voltage Motor $103.60 $109.26 $115.00 Starter 7.18.1.1 Batteries $103.60 $109.25 $115.00 7.19.1 Low Voltage Surge $103.50 $109.26 $115.00 Protection DwAces 7.19.2 Medium and High Voltage $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 Surge Protection Devices Impecgon and 7.20.1 Capacitor $103.50 $109.26 $115.00 Tut ELECTRICAL TESTING: ELECTRO-TEST, INC. FEES Tasks and Fee Schedule - All Inclusive Hourly Rates - 711101 -6/30102 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30/04 Procedures 7.22.1 Engine Generators $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 7.22.2 Uninterruptible Power $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 Systems 7.22.3 Automatic Transfer Svatches $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 9.1 Thermographic Survey $103.50 $109.25 $115.00 7/1101 -6/30/02 7/1/02-6/30/03 7/1/03-6/30104 Other Fees Minimum Daily Call-Out Charge $414.00 $437.00 $460.00 Travel Time $103.60 $109.26 $116.00 Mileage Charge $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 Oil Processing Lab Fees $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Other Direct Cost —Negotiated— Other Other (Note: Escalation rates for all services are about 5.3%) i l PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ea.or Dir. 06/06/02 06/26/02 um N AGENDA REPORT Item ber Item Number Pm Numb 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Back, Project Manager SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5.46 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46, with Ken Thompson, Inc., authorizing an addition of$121,341, increasing the total contract amount to $5,716,066. SUMMARY Background • Contract No. 5.46, Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, includes the installation of 6,800 feet of double 30-inch PVC pipes with manholes and junction structures, lining repair of 2,700 feet of existing 24-inch sewer, and street improvements on Back Bay Drive in the City of Newport Beach. • Tran Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to Ken Thompson, Inc. on July 31, 2001. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date July 31, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date November 03, 2002 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 2 Current Contract Completion Date December 10, 2002 Anticipated Completion Date November 03, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Liquidated Damages Assessment N/A Change Order No. 2 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Modifications to Junction Box No. 2 $ 1,648.00 0 Changed Condition 2 Security Services $ 2,968.00 0 Design Change 3 Miscellaneous Changes $4,459.00 0 Design Change 1 4 Extra Pipe Lining Material $ 3,187.00 0 Changed _ Condition 5 Storm Drain Frame &Cover Change $ 3,757.00 0 Design Change 6 Cleaning of Existing Sewer $14,448.00 3 Changed Condition 7 Paving Changes $13,864.00 0 Design Change 8 Dewatering $ 7,424.00 0 Changed Condition 9 Exported Soils $15,000.00 0 Changed Condition 10 Existing Waterline Modifications $32,919.00 6 Changed Condition 11 Road Improvements $ 3,007.00 0 Design Change 12 Sewer Lateral to Hotel $ 4,016.00 1 Omission 13 Storm Drain Changes $14,644.00 2 Changed Conditions Total -Change Order No. 2 $121,341.00 12 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 5.500.000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 94,725.00 This Change Order(CO No. 2, Add) $ 121,341.00 Change Orders to Date $ 216,066.00 Percent Increase to Date 3.93%9 Amended Contract Price $ 5,716,066.00 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (FY 01-02 Budget: Collections System, Section e-Page 25) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None G Wq EtaUgmN8w0A9eM3��2R-M A9eMa Pgps`DfANum 15(91 Nbd¢ s,„x„ WWI Page 2 CEG.A FINDINGS The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program was approved by the Board of Directors on May 24, 2000. The Notice of Determination was filed on June 15, 2000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 2 G.rom " gMBeud Ap Bmm RyIW Pewu`as�NwntslalSKdx x....e: % 1 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract 5-46 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 2.600 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 16.000 S 15,722 98% Studies/Permitting $ 8,500 $ - $ 8.500 $ 8,500 $ - $ 8.500 $ 8,056 95% Consultant PSA $ 438.500 $ 265.839 1 $ - $ 265,839 1 $ 265,839 1 $ - $ 265,839 $ 255,006 96% Desi nStaff $ 372,200 $ 260.000 $ - $ 260,000 $ 260.000 $ - $ 260.000 $ 255,591 98% Construction Contract $ 4,280.900 $ 5,594,725 $ 121,341 $ 5.716,066 $ 5.594.725 $ 121,341 $ 5,716,065 $ 4.892.623 86% Construction Administration $ 1.132,400 $ 271,000 $ 271.000 $ 271.000 $ 271,000 $ 159,601 59% Construction Inspection $ 366.000 $ 366,000 $ 366.000 $ 366,000 $ 184,742 50% Contingency $ 1,867.200 $ 1.438.936 $ 121,341 $ 1.317,595 PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 8,093,800 1 $ 8,221.000 $ - $ 8,221,000 $ 6,782,084 S 121.341 $ 6,903,405 $ 5,771,341 84% Reimbursable Costs I $ 126.000 $ - $ 126.000 11 $ PROJECT NET 1 $ 8,093,800 1 $ 8.095,000 1 $ - $ 8,095,000 $ 6,782,064 $ 121,341 $ 6,903,405 $ 5.771,341 84% C%TEMP15-46 Budget Table for CO 92 June 02.v1slDislric5 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT REPLACEMENT OF BACK BAY TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT 6-46 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACTCOST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS( CONTRACT July 31,2001 $ 5,500,000 $ 5,500,000 461 461 CO NO. 1 4/4/02 $ 94,725 $ 5,594,725 1.72% 25 486 CO NO. 2 Pending $ 121,341 $ 5,716,068 3.93% 12 498 EDMS/Doe Class/Class/Template/Change OrtlerdCftanBe Order Status Report(003717854) Page 1 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ken Thompson, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26 2002 Job: Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer. Contract No. 5-46 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order(Add)(DeduGt) $121,341.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —MODIFICATION TO JUNCTION STRUCTURE NO. 2 This item is for modification work to Junction Structure No. 2 to accommodate flowline elevations of an existing incoming sewer. Formwork for the junction structure had to be adjusted after it was discovered that the existing sewer entered the structure at a lower elevation than shown on the drawings. The box was modified to match the elevation- The work consisted of adjustments to wooden formwork for the curved and rectangular structure. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO 546-7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,648.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—SECURITY SERVICES This item is for job site security services provided by a security firm during the early part of the project. At the start of the job the public often ignored posted signs and entered the construction site illegally, mostly after hours and on weekends. By hiring a security firth the potential for sewage, gasoline and oil spills caused by intruders tampering with equipment were reduced. The District and the Contractor negotiated a cost split since desired security services went beyond contract requirements. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO 546-3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,968.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT .. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ken Thompson, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers ITEM 3— MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES This item is for the following additions to the contract: • District required the Contractor to provide additional signs with more detailed information to help keep the public out of the construction site. • The existing concrete road section on Back Bay Drive between stations 26+80 and 29+85 had to be raised to match the concrete encasement of the new pipe. This work was not included in the contract. • District required the Contractor to backfll around parts of the existing sewer pipe with a cement- slurry mix. During trenching for the new sewer, some of the soil around the old sewer caved in. Since the existing sewer was closer to the new sewer than shown on the drawings, this item became extra work. • Contractor had to remove six to twelve inches of undisclosed concrete between stations 26+80 and 29+85 for installation of the new pipe. • District directed the Contractor to provide containment around an existing manhole to prevent a potential sewage spill. This work was not part of the contract. • Contractor performed miscellaneous non-contract required repair work on an existing manhole. • District directed the Contractor to remove and replace an existing storm drain at Station 19+00 for sewer pipe installation. This storm drain was shown to be abandoned on the drawings, but had to be kept in service because it was found to drain an area on Back Bay Drive. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 35 (8) of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO 546-1, 4, 14) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4.459.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4— EXTRA PIPE LINING MATERIAL This item is for the purchase of 100 additional feet of cured in place pipe liner(CIPP) material. More CIPP material was provided because the exact length of existing pipe to be lined could not be determined due to grit accumulation and submergence of the last third of the pipe. Additionally, the District increased the length of pipe to be lined by relocating Junction Box No. 2. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 35(B) of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO 546-13) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,187.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ken Thompson, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26. 2002 Job: Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46 Consultant: Tran Consultino Engineers ITEM 5—STORM DRAIN FRAME AND COVER CHANGE This item covers the cost to revise storm drain frames and covers per City of Newport Beach standards. The City requested frames and covers per City Standard STD-114-L,which did not match contract specifications. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO 546-12) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,757.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6—CLEANING OF EXISTING SEWER This hem is for extra cleaning efforts to the existing pipe between Stations 68+70 and 76+60. Half of the pipe was filled with grit and sludge, which had to he removed by the Contractor in preparation for pipe rehabilitation. The extent of cleaning was not disclosed in the contract. The work consisted of jetting, interior pipe brushing, and debris disposal. Credit for the cleaning required by the contract is included in this item. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,448.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days ITEM 7— PAVING CHANGES This item is for extra mobilization, paving materials, and labor and equipment charges to improve the road surface on Back Bay Drive. The Contractor installed extra pavement to eliminate high points created by newly constructed storm drains crossing the road. The storm drains were installed per contract specifications, but created an uneven road surface. Also included is early mobilization for paving requested by the District to provide a smooth road surface to users right after completion of Phases 1 and 2. The contract specified paving to take place after completion of all work phases in November 2002. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO 546-8) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13.864.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ken Thompson. Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers ITEM 8— DEWATERING This item represents a negotiated cost split for charges associated with extra dewatering efforts at the beginning of Project Phase 1. Groundwater was found at higher levels than indicated in the Geotechnical Report. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,424.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 9—EXPORTED SOILS This item is for extra trucking cost associated with removal of undisclosed asphalt. The Contractor encountered several layers of asphalt materials at various elevations during pipe excavation work, which were not indicated in the contract. These materials had to be transported to special dump sites. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15.000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10— EXISTING WATERLINE MODIFICATIONS This item is for waterline modifications at two separate locations: • At Station 18+90, the Contractor had to remove and replace an existing 6-inch waterline that conflicted with the new sewer. This was not shown on the drawings. Contractor routed the waterline under the sewer per City direction. Part of the work consisted of excavating, pipe removal and replacement, concrete work, disinfection and backfill. The other part of the work consisted of water pumping and clean up caused by an overnight waterline leak into the trench of the new pipe. • At Station 17+90, an existing 8-inch waterline conflicted with the new sewer. The Contractor was directed to route the waterline under the sewer. The work consisted of excavating, pipe removal and replacement, concrete work, disinfection and backfill. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 32,919.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days Page 5 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ken Thompson, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46 Consultant: Tran Consulting Enaineers ITEM 11 —ROAD IMPROVEMENTS This item is for road improvements to the Big Canyon access road. The City of Newport Beach requested the Installation of crushed miscellaneous base material on the road to improve access and public safety. Recreational users normally use Back Bay Drive, a paved road. However, due to construction of this project, sections of Back Bay Drive were closed to all traffic, resulting in increased public use of the Big Canyon access road. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements, ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,007.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 12—SEWER LATERAL TO HOTEL This item is for rerouting of an existing 8-inch sewer lateral at Station 13+50. The lateral,which services the Hyatt Newporter Hotel, was not shown on the drawings. It had to be rerouted because it conflicted with the new sewer. The work consisted of excavating, pipe removal and replacement, and backfill. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,016.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day ITEM 13—STORM DRAIN CHANGES This item is for the following changes to existing storm drains: • At Stations 49+96 and 57+84, the existing storm drain pipes could not be modified per contract requirements due to storm drain locations differing from contract specifications. The Contractor had to replace more pipe than specified and construct special inlet structures to route the storm drains over the new sewer. The work consisted of excavating, pipe removal and replacement, concrete construction, and backfill. • At Station 52+90, the existing storm drain pipe conflicted with the new sewer, which was not indicated on the drawings. The Contractor had to route the storm drain under the new sewer. The work consisted of excavating, pipe removal and replacement, construction of a manhole, and backfill. Page 6 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ken Thompson, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 35 (B) of the General Requirements. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,644.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 121,341.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 12 Calendar Days Page 7 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Ken Thompson, Inc. C.O. No.: Two M Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 12 calendar day time extension is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: July 31, 2001 Original Contract Time: 461 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 03, 2002 Time Extension this C.O.: 12 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 37 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 498 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: December 10, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $ 5,500,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 94,725.00 This Change (Add) (Deduet) $ 121,341.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5,716,066.00 t Page 8 of 8 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT .. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Ken Thompson, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-46 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: June 26, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John D. Linder Construction Manager Date Approved by: David A. Ludwin Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Ken Thompson, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS/Doc CImeVChs emplace/Change Ordere/Change Order Form(M3717850) PDC COMMITTEE Meedng Date To ed.of Mr. 6/6/02 6/26/D2 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number _ PDCO2-37 15(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND O AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-39 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 10 to Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M. N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$107,027 and a time extension of 63 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $10,782,595. SUMMARY Background • Job No. P2-39, Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, includes the cleaning of accumulated grit from the digesters, installing a flow mixing system to increase digester efficiency and reduce grit accumulation, insulating four of the digester domes to reduce heat loss, adding an interior plastic liner on the digester domes, and upgrading the digester control systems. • Lee and Ro and Spec Services prepared the plans and specifications, and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction on August 25, 1999. • Item No. 1 includes work to replace pipes, supports, and access doors inside Digester K. Since the replaced items are inside Digester K, their condition was not known during the design phase. Item No. 8 includes work to modify the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) program for the project. During the programming phase of the project it was discovered that the completed program would not fit into the existing PLC. The modifications included reducing the program size to make it fit into the existing PLC. This information was not known during the design phase because the amount of memory necessary for any PLC program cannot be accurately determined until all programming work is completed. A portion of Item No. 13 includes a design error which the District will seek reimbursement from the Designer. Page 1 „4 Contract Schedule Contract Start Date October 26, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date October 24, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 10 Current Contract Completion Date June 30, 2002 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Chance Order No. 10 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Replace Pipes, Supports, Access $27,912 0 Changed Doors, Valves, and Seal Cracks at Condition Di ester K 2 Relocate Drain Line Inside $3,227 0 Omission Dewatering BuildingControl Room 3 Replace Steel Pipe and Repair $8,017 0 Changed Cracks at Digesters N and O 1 Condition 4 Add New Plant Water Line To Seal $1,299 0 Design Waters stem Change 5 Credit To Reduce Liner Area ($3,000) 0 Design Inside Di esters I. J. and K Change 6 Install New MCC Bucket to MCC- $4,562 0 Omission DW 7 Additional Work at MCC-DW $12,553 0 Omission 8 PLC Programming Modifications $29,832 28 Design Chan e 9 Add Pipe Supports $6,339 0 Design Chan e 10 Seal Water Modifications $5,720 0 Design Change 11 Temporary Power for MCC-M $2,582 0 Omission 12 Transfer Sludge Between Drying $3,272 0 Other Beds 13 Replace Wire and Add Breaker at $837 0 Errors MCC-RS 14 Install Cables and Junction Boxes $3,875 0 Design at Dsweltering Building Change 15 Reduction in Retention $0 0 16 Time Extension for Inclement $0 35 Weather Total Change Order No. 10 $107,027 63 Page 2 Job Completion This contract is now 90% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 1,027,968.00 This Change (Add) (Ded in $ 107.027.00 Change Orders to Date $ 1,134,995.00 Percentage Increase to Date 11.76% Amended Contract Price $10,782,595.00 Note: Change Order No. 2 in the amount of$552,000 included hauling and land application of dried biosolids obtained during the digester cleaning process not included in this contract. Change Order No. 2 resulted in cost savings of $111,180 to the District. The total change order percentage including Change Order No. 10 would be 6.04% without Change Order No. 2. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section a-Page 76) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information Rem) Staff requests a reallocation of funds in the construction budget of$107,027 to include all previous change orders and this change order. Contingency budget has been reduced and reallocated to the construction contract budget. There is no increase in the total project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA and Districts guidelines, Section 15301 (B). The Notice of exemption was filed with the County Clerk on March 17, 1998. Page 3 p ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Infonnation Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order UM:dm WniglobaMgenda Draft ReportsVgX AR P239 CO#10.090602.doc Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I,J,K,L,M,N, AND O AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE. EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development Studies/Permittin Consultant PSA $ 1,045.000 $ 995,000 $ 995,000 $ 879,810 $ 879,810 $ 850,000 97% Design Staff $ 130.000 1 $ 844,000 $ 844,000 $ 844,000 $ 844.000 $ 844,000 100% Construction Contract $ 9.875,000 $10.675.568 $ 107,027 $ 10,782.595 $ 10,675,568 $ 107,027 $ 10,782,595 $ 10.021.142 93% Construction(other) $ 446,000 $ 446,000 $ 446,000 $ 446,000 $ 435,000 98% Construction Staff S 50.000 $ 1,914,000 $ - $ 1.914.000 $ 1.914.000 $ 1.914,000 $ 1,148,558 60% Contingency $ 279.432 $ (107,027) $ 172,405 $ - PROJECTTOTAL $ 11,100.000 $ 15,154,000 $ - $15,154.000 $ 14.759.378 $ 107,027 $ 14.866,405 $ 13,298.700 89% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 11.100,000 $15,154,000 $15.154,000 $ 14,759,378 1 $ 107.027 $ 14,866.405 1 $ 13.298,700 89% EDMS-tM3730553 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS I, J, K, L, M, N, AND O AT PLANT 2 JOB NO. P2-39 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 8/25/99 $ 9,647,600 $ 9,647,600 730 730 CO NO. 1` 3/28/00 $ (142,344) $ 9,505,256 -1.48% 72 802 CO NO. 2 4/26/00 $ 552,000 $ 10,057,256 4.25% 0 802 CO NO, 3' 7/6100 $ (70,815) $ 9,986,441 3.51% 0 802 CO NO. 4 7/19/00 $ 91,834 $ 10.078,275 4,46% 56 858 CO NO. 5 10125/00 $ 196,994 $ 10,275,269 6.51% 28 886 CO NO. 6 12/20/00 $ 52,782 $ 10,328,051 7.05% 0 886 CO NO, 7 2/28/01 $ 221,581 $ 10,549,632 9.35% 30 916 CONO. 8-* 5/17/Ot $ 54,073 $ 10,603,705 9.91% 0 916 CO NO. 9" 9/6/01 $ 71,863 $ 10,675,568 10.66% 0 916 "CO NO. 10 1 6/26102 ;$: 107,027]4 _ 10,782;695 ^f•T 11;78%` , "` 0; r? � 'Approval by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 —PDC Approval EDMS:003730549 Page 1 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 .. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 10 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Aedust) $107,027.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —REPLACE PIPES, SUPPORTS, ACCESS DOORS,VALVES, AND SEAL CRACKS AT DIGESTER K This item is for labor, material, and equipment to perform the following work at Digester K: A. Demolish four concrete supports and wall spool to bottom sludge pipe and install new concrete pipe supports and wall spool. Cost of this change is $8,200.00 B. Remove and replace 38 feet long, 8-inch diameter sludge pipe, sandblast and paint with coal tar epoxy. Cost of this change is $ 5,976.00. C. Remove and replace two digester access doors and repair frames to the access doors. Cost of this change is $6,762.00. D. Remove and replace four valves 8-inch diameter at Digester K mixing and transfer pumps. The valves were furnished by the District. Cost of this change is $1,700.00 E. Remove 40 feet length of existing 8-inch PVC pipe and replace with ductile iron pipe. This length of PVC pipe was connected to ductile iron pipes on either side and used for collecting digester gas from Digester K. PVC pipe is not a preferable in the long term for gas collection and was replaced to match existing piping. Cost of this change is $2,031.00. F. Seal cracks and pinholes at top of existing concrete dome. The defects were repaired with a structural epoxy to prevent gas leaks. Cost of this change is $3,243.00. Items A, B, C, and D were necessary because the concrete supports, wall spools, bottom sludge pipes, access doors, and valves were corroded and had to be replaced or refurbished and was not known during the design phase. All work inside Digester K was performed as permit required confined spaces. The above work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 35 and Margate Letter Dated June 8, 2001. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $27,912.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 .. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 10 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. ITEM 2—RELOCATE DRAIN LINE INSIDE DEWATERING BUILDING CONTROL ROOM This Rem is for labor, material, and equipment to relocate an existing 4-inch drain inside the Dewatering Building Control Room. This drain line was interfering with the layout of the new MCC-DW that was being installed and was not shown on the contract drawings. Work included co-redrilling the concrete wall and routing the drain pipe outside the dewatering building. This work was not included In the contract documents and was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)(2)(b)of the General Provisions. Reference Field Change Order No. 30. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,227.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3—REPLACE STEEL PIPE AND FIX CRACKS AT DIGESTERS N AND O This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to perform the following work at Digesters N and O: A. Remove and replace 20 feet of 3-inch steel pipe, 3 feet of 4-inch steel pipe, insulation, and fittings inside Digesters N and O pump room. The steel pipe is used to transfer hotwater from the hotwater pump to the heat exchanger. The pipes deteriorated and had to be replaced. The condition of the pipe was not known until the insulation on the pipes was removed. Cost of this change is $6.470.00. B. Cracks that were observed on the concrete dome on top of Digesters N and O were repaired. The defects were repaired by applying a structural epoxy to each crack. The cracks were sealed to prevent gas leakage and to preserve the new urethane insulation system that was installed on the digester domes. This additional work was not included in Change Order No. 9, Item 1 E. Cost of this change is $ 1,547.00. This work was accomplished by the Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference Field Change Order No. 31. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,017.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construclion, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 10 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I J K L, M. N, and O at Plant No. 2. Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. ITEM 4—ADD NEW PLANT WATER LINE TO SEAL WATER SYSTEM This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to install 1-inch plant water line at Digester N and O mixing pumps. The work included installing 50 linear feet of 1-inch steel pipe and fittings from the plant water line to Digesters N and O mixing pumps. The pressure in the water line indicated on the contract documents was not adequate to feed the seal water system. The new water line was installed to eliminate any pressure drop and provide a reliable source of water at constant pressure to the Digesters N and O mixing pump seal water system. This work was accomplished by the Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 28. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,299.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5—CREDIT TO REDUCE LINER AREA INSIDE DIGESTERS I, J, AND K This is a credit item for materials to reduce PVC lining inside Digesters I, J, and K. The original contract documents indicated liners to be installed on the inside surface of domes and walls to Digesters I, J, and K. The intent of the liner was to prevent corrosion of concrete inside these digesters. Inspection inside Digesters 1, J, and K revealed that the condition of concrete walls was in good condition. Therefore the liners were installed only on the inside surface of domes and the top surface (8 feet) of digester walls which is typical to the repairs to the other digesters on this project. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference Margate's Letter Dated May 14, 2001. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($3,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6— INSTALL NEW MCC BUCKET TO MCC-DW This item is for labor, material, and equipment to install a new bucket inside MCC-DW. The work included adding a new bucket with a circuit breaker and necessary wiring to provide power for the 10-ton crane inside the Dewatering Building. The contract documents included work to replace the existing MCC with a new MCC but did not include work to provide power to the existing 10-ton crane. This work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 36 and Margate's Letter Dated August 15, 2001. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,562.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 10 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M. N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Re, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. ITEM 7—ADDITIONAL WORK AT MCC-DW This Rem is for labor, material, and equipment for wiring changes, testing and check out at MCC-DW. MCC-DW is located inside the Dewatering Building Control Room. The contract work included replacing the existing MCC with a new MCC. Equipment wired to the new MCC-DW include the belt presses, sludge pumps, and polymer pumps. Additional wiring changes and testing were necessary because the record drawings did not match field conditions. Therefore, additional time was expended to track the routes of power and control wiring between the pumps (total of 20), belt presses (total of 10), belt press control panels (total of 10), modicon control panel, and MCC-DW. The new MCC buckets had to be wired differently to the field devices than the existing buckets because the new buckets take into consideration scope for future automation. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference Margate's Letter Dated November 7, 2001. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,553.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 10 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J K L. M. N and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. ITEM 8—PLC PROGRAMMING MODIFICATIONS This Rem is for labor to modify the Programmable Logic Control (PLC) program for this project. Modifications included the following: A. Combining networks, replacing groups of instructions with single instruction that accomplish the same function. Cost of this change is $10.605. B. Limited rewrite of program rode to increase efficiency with no impact to CRISP graphics. Cost of this change is $9,395. C. Eliminate timer and modify program to reflect that the Operator verifies and acknowledges for sludge overfeed before alarm resets. Cost of this change is $3,000. D. Rescale two hot water pressure transmitters from 0-50 psi to 0-100 psi at Digesters L and M and include changes in the graphics and program. Cost of this change is 1,468. E. Delete lead/lag logic for Digester L and M mixing pumps. Cost of this change is $364. F. Add 11 display screens/graphics for the sludge feed system. Cost of this change is $5,000. Items A and B were performed for the following reasons: (i) During the programming phase of the project to automate Digesters K through O and the sludge feed system, it was discovered that there was not enough memory in the existing PLC to accommodate the new program. This change will reduce the logic and memory so that the program can be transferred to the existing PLC. (ii) Avoid addition of a new PLC and associated programming work. Item C was performed to enable an operator to acknowledge an alarm on the CRISP screen for sludge overfeed to a particular digester before alarm is reset. Item D was to rescale hot water pressure transmitters at Digesters L and M. During the startup of Digesters L and M R was noted that the pressure of the hot water loop was higher than expected. The pressure of the hotwater loop was not known during the design phase. Therefore the pressure transmitters were rescaled to 0-100 psi. Item E includes work to delete lead/lag logic for Digester L and M mixing pumps. The controls to the mixing pumps were designed such that the stand by pump would come on if the duty pump failed. However this feature required valves to be opened and closed manually. Since automation of these valves was not included in the contract, the Contractor was directed to delete the lead /lag logic and include interlock between the two pumps. Item D includes work to add new screens to the sludge feed system. The new screens will provide a consistent format of screens/graphics and will improve clarity of sludge feed operation to operators. Page 6 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 10 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Re, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. This work item is on the critical path of the construction schedule and a time extension of 28 calendar days was necessary for the District and the Contractor to review the program, revise the program, and negotiate costs for the changes. This work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 29 and 41 and Margate's Letters Dated December 26, 2001, July 11, 2001, June 6, 2001, and May 23, 2001. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $29,832.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 28 Calendar Days ITEM 9—ADD PIPE SUPPORTS This item is for labor, material, and equipment for adding new supports (total of 6) for gas lines between Digesters I and J and J and K. Plan Change 5 included work to replace existing 8-inch PVC gas lines with 8-inch ductile iron pipe. The existing supports were not adequate to support the new ductile iron pipe and had to be replaced with heavier supports. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference Plan Change No. 5 and Margate's Letter Dated April 5, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,339.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10—SEAL WATER MODIFICATIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment to modify seal water systems for 13 mixing and transfer pumps (two each at Digesters L, M, N, O, and K and three at Digesters I and J pump room). Work included adding a strainer to the system and resetting the pressure switches to minimize use of water for this system. The strainers were added to reduce turbidity in the plant water used for the seal water system and avoid clogging problems in the rotameters. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference Field Change Order No. 21 and RFI 105. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,720.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 6 Page 7 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 - FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 10 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. ITEM 11 —TEMPORARY POWER FOR MCC-M This Rem is for labor, material, and equipment to provide temporary power to equipment that has to remain operational during the MCC-M (at Digesters I and J) change over. During the installation of the new MCC unit, temporary power was necessary for the sump pumps at I and J pump room and for the lighting panel that serve the area and tunnel lighting. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference Field Change Order No. 39 and Margate's Letter dated January 17, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,582.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 12—TRANFER SLUDGE BETWEEN DRYING BEDS This item is for labor and equipment to transfer sludge which was placed in drying beds 9 and 11 by this Contract to neighboring beds. This work was performed to facilitate geologists working on the design of Job No. P2-66 to perform cone penetration tests and verify fault locations inside drying beds 9 and 11. The existing drying beds area will be used in the future to build new structures for the headworks expansion under Job No. P2-66. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference Field Change Order No. 44. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,272.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 13 — REPLACE WIRE AND ADD BREAKER AT MCC-RS This item is for labor, material, and equipment to replace wiring and add a 30-amp breaker for the new HVAC unit inside MCC-RS. The specified and installed#12 AWG wiring was not adequate for the HVAC unit and had to be replaced with#10 AWG wiring. A 30-amp breaker was installed instead of the designed 15-amp breaker. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference Field Change Order No. 42, RFI 143 and Margate's Letter dated February 25, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $837.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days e Page 8 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 .. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 110 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J. K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. ITEM 14— INSTALL CABLES AND JUNCTION BOXES AT DEWATERING BUILDING This item is for labor, material, and equipment to install cables and junction boxes between the VFDs for transfer pumps at Digester I and J located inside the Dewatering Building to the control panel. Insulated cable wire was installed in lieu of the specified#14 AWG wire (between the VFDs and control panel). The specified wiring was upgraded to ensure proper functioning of the RPM meter and the speed potentiometer in the VFDs. Junction boxes were added to extend wiring to the new VFD location. The VFDs were relocated because the new VFDs were larger in size as compared to the existing VFDs. The exact size of the VFDs was not known during the design phase. This work was not included in the contract documents and was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. Reference Field Change Order No. 40 and Margate's Letters (2)dated February 25, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,875.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 15—REDUCTION IN RETENTION The project is now 90% complete and all work to date has been completed in accordance with the contract requirements. The Contractor has requested a reduction in retained funds from ten percent to five percent. District staff agrees to this reduction of currently retained funds. Reference Margate's Letter Dated December 26, 2001. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 16—TIME EXTENSION FOR INCLEMENT WEATHER The contract documents provide for granting a time extension to the contract equal to the time of the loss beyond the control of the Contractor. Included in the contract time are 15 calendar days for inclement weather. This item resolves the time extension requested by the Contractor for inclement weather throughout the Contract. This item was negotiated pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference Margate Letter Dated March 31, 2000 and May 1, 2001. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 35 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $107,027.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 63 Calendar Days ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Page 9 of 10 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 10 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J. K, L, M. N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 63-day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 26, 1999 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 24, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 63 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 249 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 979 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: June 30, 2002 Projected Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 9,647,600.00 Prev .Authorized Changes $ 1,027,968.00 This Change (Add) (Aedust) $ 107,027.00 Amended Contract Price $10,782,595.00 ii Page 10 of 10 ,+ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten 10 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M, N, and O at Plant No. 2, Job Number P2-39 Consultant: Lee and Ro, Inc. and Spec. Services, Inc. Board Authorization Date: June 26, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: John Linder, Construction Manager Date Approved by: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Margate Construction, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS: 003733629 t PDC COMMITTEE MeedngDate To ad.oroo-. 616/02 6/26102 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Them Number PDCO2-38 Item IsM Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$243,204 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66,for a total budget of$1,982,281; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $243,204 and a time extension of 126 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $1,362,281. SUMMARY Background • Job No. J-66, Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, includes construction of a new meter vault and installation of a new flowmeter on the existing 120-inch outfall. • Tran Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Urbantec Engineers, Inc., on June 28, 2000. Specialized services during construction for soils testing, excavation, dewatering, and grouting design is being provided by Ninyo and Moore. • Change Order No. 1 issued in May of 2001 included extensive redesign to the below ground structures included in this project. The District's Geo-technical consultant recommended this redesign which reduced construction costs and risks with completing the work. Cost savings included in the redesign were associated with the following work activities: excavation, concrete, meter installation, and pipe support during construction. • Item No. 1 of this change order includes costs to grout below the 120-inch outfall pipe. This grouting operation was necessary to restrict ground water from entering the excavation. Grouting operations were performed in phases to reduce costs and eliminate risks associated with uplift to the pipeline. This item includes costs for the third and final phase of grouting. The costs for the first and second grouting phase was approved under Change Order No. 2, Item 3. w • Item No. 2 of this change order includes costs for the Contractor's home office overhead, field office overhead, and equipment rentals due to delays for this change. • Extensive changes to the below ground structures on this project were made in Change Order No. 1. These changes were required to reduce unanticipated risk to the adjacent outfall pipe due to unforeseen soil conditions found after the project was bid. The changes included specific dewatering restrictions to perform the work. After change order No. 1 was issued, soil grouting was found to be necessary below the 120-inch outfall pipe to perform the work involved with the meter installation and maintain the new dewatering restrictions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date September 18, 2000 Original Contract Completion Date March 16, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3 Current Contract Completion Date July 20, 2002 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Change Order No. 3 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Phase III Grouting $189,204 126 Changed Conditions 2 Delay Costs $54,000 0 Changed Conditions Total Change Order No. 3 $243,204 126 Job Completion The contract is now 75% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 173,077.00 This Change (Add) (DedU6t) $ 243,204.00 Change Orders to Date $ 416,281.00 Percentage Increase to Date 44.00% Amended Contract Price $1,362,281.00 wMua:xxioi 2 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 8, Page 87) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Staff requests a budget amendment of$243,204. The additional funds requested for this project provide for all change orders to date required to complete the extended project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan. The final EIR was approved on October 27, 1999 and the Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order UM:dm G:mtaonanAaanda Draft Repoft%PDOAR Jre co 0.060602AW aenae:anov, 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE OUTFALL FLOW METER REPLACEMENT JOB NO. J-66 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ - S - Design Staff $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 57,200 $ 106,000 $ - $ 106,000 $ 82,200 $ 82,200 $ 80,000 97% Construction Contract $ 514.000 $ 1.119,077 $ 243,204 $ 1,362,281 $ 1.119.077 $ 243,204 $ 1.362,281 $ 664,687 49% Construction(Other) $ 27,000 $ 135,000 $ - $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ - $ 135,000 $ 108,000 80% Construction Staff $ 135,700 $ 334,000 $ - $ 334.000 $ 334,000 $ - $ 334,000 $ 260.968 78% Contingency $ 145,100 $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 924,000 $ 1.739,077 $ 243,204 $ 1,982,281 $ 1,715,277 $ 243.204 $ 1.958,481 $ 1,158,655 59% EDMS W3733249 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT JOB NO. J-66 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/28/00 $ 946,000 $ 946,000 180 180 GO NO. 1 5123101 $ (2,692) $ 943,308 -0.28% 290 470 CO NO. 2 3127/02 $ 175,769 $ 1.119,077 18.3% 75 545 CO NO..3 UA 'i. . d �.~+' "` EDMS 003733250 Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Three (3) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2 Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order(Add) pedust) $243,204.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - PHASE III GROUTING This item includes costs for labor, material, and equipment to grout below the existing 120-inch outfall. The purpose of this additional work was to prevent excess water from entering the construction area during construction. Costs for Phase I and Phase II grouting was approved under Change Order 2, Item No. 3. Phase I and II work included grouting below the north and south end of the 120-inch outfall pipe. After Phase I and Phase II grouting was completed, continuous dewatering for a period of three days did not prevent water from entering the construction area. Phase III grouting included extensive grouting below and along the length of the 120-inch pipe to form a water barrier around the construction area. Phase III work resulted in better control of groundwater. Work to construct the flowmeter structure (foundation slab, walls, and stairs) began thereafter. Grouting was accomplished in phases because staff was concerned about any movement(settlement or uplift) or damage to the existing outfall due to grouting work or exposed soil around the pipe. The pipe movement was monitored continuously during the entire grouting operation. Due to limited access, dewatering wells in the shoring areas were removed and replaced before and after each phase of grouting work. The contract documents required the Contractor to monitor dewatering wells for 15 days. This limitation was included in the contract documents to minimize removal of fine soil materials during dewatering. Due to grouting work, additional time was required to monitor dewatering wells before and during the construction of the flowmeter structure. The cost breakdown is as follows: Phase III Grouting Work $96,620.00 Remove and Replace Dewatering Wells $24,779.00 Additional Dewatering Wells Monitoring Costs $43,805.00 Additional Dewatering Wells Rental Costs $24,000,00 TOTAL COST $189,204.00 Page 2 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT .. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Three (3) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers This work item is on the critical path of the project constmdion schedule and a time extension of 126 calendar days was necessary for the District and the Contractor to review the changed condition, . negotiate costs for the changes and delays, and remobilize subcontractors. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions and delays were negotiated pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 3 and Urbantec's Letter Dated March 18, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $189,204.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 126 Calendar Days ITEM 2— DELAY COSTS This item includes delay costs associated with Item 1. The delay costs include costs for Contractor's field office and home office overhead and equipment rentals on the job site. The equipment rentals included the generator, dewatering pumps, settlement tank, well screens, and excavating equipment. The cost breakdown is as follows: Contractor Field and Office Overhead Costs, $600 per day for 45 days $27,000.00 Equipment Rental Costs, $600 per day for 45 days $27,000.00 TOTAL COST $64,000.00 This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-0 of the General Provisions. Reference Urbantec's Letter Dated March 18, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $54,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $243,204.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 126 Calendar Days Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Three (3) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2 Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 126-day extension of time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 18, 2000 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 16, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 126 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 491 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 671 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 20, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 173,077.00 This Change (Add) (PeCust) $ 243,204.00 Amended Contract Price $1,362,281.00 'I Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Three (3) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: June 26, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, Construction Manager Date Approved by: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS:003733251 PDC COMMITTEE Meeang Dete TOM.Of Dlr. O6/06/02 06/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Item m 02-39 Item NOmbe Numb Item 16(j) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Sid Kirk, Project Manager SUBJECT: JUNCTION STRUCTURE UPGRADE, JOB NO. SP2000-29 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve a budget amendment of$94,036 for Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, for a total budget of$566,236; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, with Mike Prlich and Sons, authorizing an addition of$37,483.03 and a time extension of 168 days, increasing the total contract amount to $389,736; and (3)Accept Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • Job No. SP2000-29, Junction Structure Upgrade, includes replacement of two stainless steel gates over the two 42-inch siphon inlets under the Santa Ana River at Plant No. 2. Also included in this work is upsizing the manhole opening from a 36- inch to a 48-inch frame and cover, and repair of damaged concrete and T-loc vinyl lining. • The plans and specifications were prepared in-house and the contract was awarded to Mike Prlich and Sons on February 28, 2001. • Change Order No. 2 is requesting approval of a time extension for suspension of the junction structure work while the Contractor was mobilized to make emergency repairs to the 30-inch Line A Force Main; increased cost for additional chemical treatment for odor control in the force main sewer lines; increased cost for adding three 6-inch sampling ports in the structure roof; permanent repair to the 42-inch siphon break, and provide support to video tape the 24-inch Line C and 36-inch Line B Force Mains from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Junction Structure. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date May 30, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date September 26, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 2 Current Contract Completion Date November 9, 2001 Anticipated Completion Date April 26, 2001 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Liquidated Damages Assessment N/A Change Order No. 2 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Time Extension to complete contract $ 0.00 157 Other work 2 Chemical cost for odor control $ 7,150.03 0 Other 3 Miscellaneous changes $ 30,333.00 11 Design Change Total - Change Order No. 2 $ 37,483.03 168 Job Completion • This contract is now 100% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 188,700.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 163,552.97 This Change Order(CO No. 2, Add) $ 37,483.03 Change Orders to Date $ 201,036.00 Percent Increase to Date' 106.53% Amended Contract Price $ 389,736.00 Change Order No. 1 and No. 2 increased the contract 106.53% as a result of the added work to clean two 42-inch siphons, repair an unknown break in one siphon, provide access to the junction structure for continuous mitigation of odors, and to investigate the condition of three ductile iron force mains into the structure. This added work was not anticipated prior to construction and involved unavoidable maintenance and repair. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) c:e.nmaowa�aaa iyxma rteoan:am mom penes xwuomame�+s�sr2aaaasmm „„ , Page 2 ' Additional budget is required to provide funds for this construction contract change order and additional staff costs. Item 3 required significant additional Administration and Engineering staff costs to implement the change. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt. A Notice of Exemption was filed on November 2, 2000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 2 SK:Ic WVeaQWatalMWobagAgemia DmX ReporWPDC%A SP2000-29CON2 and COAND602.0o0 G'rplpupatlHBmC aYeW ae�att\AN aaNapTYf aeV�a'aWabm t5Q1.aV3Wa]anz : r Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE JUNCTION STRUCTURE UPGRADE JOB NO. SP2000-29 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 2.100 S 2.100 $ 2.100 $ 2,100 $ 2,032 97% Studies/Permitting $ 7.200 $ 7.200 $ 7,200 S 7,200 $ 7200 100% Consultant PSA $ 20,000 $ $ Design Staff $ 14,200 $ 14,200 $ 50,000 $ 64.200 $ 14,200 $ 50,000 S 64,200 $ 64,019 100% Construction Contract $ 213,000 $ 352,253 $ 37483 $ 389,736 $ 352,253 S 37,483 $ 389,736 $ 352,253 90% Construction Administration $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 55,000 $ 70,000 $ 15,000 $ 55,000 $ 70,000 $ 59,778 85% Construction Inspection $ 5,000 $ 20,000 $ 13,000 $ 33,000 $ 20.000 $ 13,000 $ 33,000 $ 32,429 98% Contin enc $ 25.000 $ 61 447 $ 61,447 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 282.200 $ 472,200 $ 94,036 $ 566,236 $ 410.753 S 155.483 $ 566.236 $ 518,711 92% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET S 282,200 1 $ 472.200 1 $ 94,036 1 $ 566,236 11 $ 410,753 1 $ 155.483 1 $ 566,236 1 $ 518,711 1 92% Gm .tsan9�.W i MVOoo-2swedsei table cm2 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Junction Structure Upgrade Job No. SP2000-29 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACTCOST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 4/30/01 $ 188,700.00 $ 188,700.00 0.00% 120 120 CO NO. 1 2127/02 $ 163,552.97 $ 352 252.97 86.67% 44 164 CO NO. 2 Pending $ 37,483.03 $ 389,736.00 106.54% 168 332 H:wp.dtakngyobs and conhactsSP2000.2MChange Order5k=.slatus.Ns ` Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Prlich and Sons C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Junction Structure Uoarede. Job No. SP2000-29 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Beduet) $ 37,483.03 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —TIME EXTENSIONS TO COMPLETE WORK AT JUNCTION STRUCTURES 5 AND 6 Contract work was suspended when the Contractor was mobilized to construct the emergency replacement of the existing Line A Force Main, from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Junction Structure. The Contractor mobilized for this work in November 2001 and completed the work in April 2002. The Contractor is requesting a time extension to complete the junction structure work pursuant to Section 49 of the General Requirements of the Specifications. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 157 Calendar Days ITEM 2— INCREASED USE OF BIOXIDE CHEMICAL FOR ODOR CONTROL The Contractor was directed to continue feeding chemical on a continuous schedule into the force main lines to mitigate odors at Junction Structure 5 and 6 during the time the Contractor was unable to perform work within the structure. The Contractor is requesting payment for this additional cost pursuant to Section 49 of the General requirements of the Specifications. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,150.03 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3—SAMPLING PORTS,SIPHON REPAIR AND VIDEO TAPING • The Contractor was directed by the District to install three 6-inch sampling ports through the junction structure roof for retrieving water samples from the discharge of the 3 force mains into the junction structure. Work included core drilling through the roof, installing 6-inch diameter PVC pipes 10 feet long, and additional vinyl welding. • Completing the permanent repair of the 42-inch siphon which included isolating the south siphon by reinstalling slop longs in the junction structure and the outlet manhole in Plant 2. • Provide support for video taping the 24-Inch Line C and 36-inch Line B force mains from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Junction Structure. Page 2 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Prlich and Sons C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29 This work was accomplished pursuant to Section 48, Division 01 of the General Requirements of the Specifications. (Reference FCO SP200029-2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $30,333.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDERS ITEM: 11 Calendar Days TOTAL COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $37.483.03 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 168 Calendar Days Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Pdich and Sons C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: June 26 2002 Job: Junction Structure Upgrade. Job No. SP2000-29 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 168 calendar day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: May 30,2001 Original Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: September 26, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 168 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 212 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 332 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 26, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 188.700.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 163,552.97 This Change (Add) (Dedaet) $ 37,483.03 Amended Contract Price $ 389,736.00 I Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich and Sons C.O. No.: Two (21 Date: June 26, 2002 Job: Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29 Board Authorization Date: June 26, 2002 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: MIKE PRLICH AND SONS Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE meenogoac To80.oFDlr. O6/O6/02 O6/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Item O,_ Item Nurn _ _ _ e 1 15k Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Sejal Patel, Project Manager SUBJECT: ENGINEERING TRAILER COMPLEX AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-90 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file plans and specifications for Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-90; and (2) Authorize the General Manager to award a Contract to the lowest bidder for an amount not to exceed the engineer's estimate of $1,675,000. SUMMARY • A budget for Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-90, was approved by the Board of Directors in April 2002. This project is necessary for implementation of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Capital Improvement Program (CIP). • The Engineering Department will be retaining a Program Management Consultant (PMC) within six months to help manage our increased CIP. There is no available office space for the proposed PMC staff. In addition, the District's Construction Management staff will need a new office facility due to the construction of Job No. P1-76, Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers which places pipelines through the existing Construction Management Trailer complex. • To expedite this project, Staff is requesting that the Board of Directors grant the General Manager authority to award the Construction Contract for an amount not to exceed the Engineer's Estimate of $1,675,000. This authorization will expedite the project by 35 days. • The plans and specifications will be completed in June 2002 and bidding is scheduled for July 19, 2002. The Contractor will have 135 calendar days from the date of the Notice to Proceed to complete the construction. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization not to exceed $1,675,000 for the Construction Contract is being requested at this time. The exact amount will be the lowest responsible bid received on July 19, 2002. This amount will be reported to the Board of Directors at the July 2002 Board meeting. Please see the attached Budget Information Table. Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A total project budget of$1,982,000 was authorized by the Board of Directors in April 2002, as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The project will provide the following: • Twelve new double-wide modular trailers, including approximately 44 offices, 24 cubicles, two printer/Xerox areas, three conference rooms, storageffiling areas, and four restrooms. • All required trenching, piping, wiring, and associated utility work to provide a complete office facility including furniture. The trailer complex will be located near the comer of Ward-and Garfield on Orange County Sanitation District property. This project will accommodate the Construction Management staff, the Program Management Consultant (PMC) staff, and the newly structured Engineering Department. By locating all Staff in one area, efficiency and collaboration will be improved. Retaining a PMC is necessary to support the Capital Improvement Program over the next four to six years. There is no vacant office space to accommodate staff, and the existing Construction Management offices are scheduled for demolition, therefore, this project is being implemented in the most expeditious manner. ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with this project. This alternative is not recommended because it will have several impacts: • Construction Management staff will not have offices starting March 2003. • The proposed PMC will not have any working space • The newly structured Engineering and Construction Management Division will remain separated. CEOA FINDINGS An Addendum to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR is being prepared. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table SP:sa G:wglobaMwntla Deft ReporlsXPDCWR J-90 060602.dw Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ENGINEERING TRAILER COMPLEX JOB NO. J-90 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 12,000 $ 12,000 S 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 100% Studies/PermiBin $ 5.000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Design Staff $ 45,000 $ 45,000 S 45,000 $ 45,000 Consultant PSA Construction Contract $ 1.675,000 $ 1.675.000 $1.675,000 $1.675,000 Construction Administration $ 44,000 $ 44,000 $ 44,000 $ 44,000 Construction Inspection $ 33,000 $ 33,000 $ 33,000 $ 33,000 Contingency $ 168,000 $ 168,000 TOTAL $ 1,982.000 $ 1,982,000 $ 1.752.000 $ 1,814,000 $ 12,000 1 G1wa41a%eN%72MpateW-90 Engineenn,Trailer GomplexgJ-90 Budget Table 051Dialnde �Y PDC COMMITTEE Meetln9Date Toeai6of 01 /02r oWae/az oW2e/oz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCO242 150) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Sejal Patel, Engineer SUBJECT: SPACE ALLOCATION & INTERIOR RENOVATION, JOB NO. J-84 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Fluor Signature Services, for Space Allocation & Interior Renovation, Job No. J-84, providing for additional conceptual design work for an additional amount of $34,200, increasing the total amount not to exceed $463,000. SUMMARY • The purpose of this project is to create a more efficient work environment for employees, offering work group functionality and better circulation, with improved lighting, parking, meeting areas, and a storagelfiling system. This project will resolve space and parking needs, and solve inconsistencies within the space usage. • This Addendum will redirect some of the conceptual design work to accommodate the restructured Engineering Department. It will also expand the Scope of Work to include conceptual design for the Board Room and conduct an additional furniture inventory of the Information Technology Department. • The above mentioned work was unanticipated and, therefore, not originally included in the scope. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This Addendum No. 2 is for an amount not to exceed $34,200 and will amend the Professional Services Agreement (PSA)to an amount not to exceed $463,000. The attached Budget Information Table shows the proposed adjustments. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) eaN•b:e=+ Page 1 Under"Proposed Budget Increase" $34,200 is being requested to adjust the budget for the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) and $34,200 from Contingency is being requested to offset this increase. The project budget of$795,800.was authorized by the Board of Directors in October 2001. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This is a three-phase design project. In March 2001, Fluor Signature Services (Fluor)was awarded a PSA for Phase I, in the amount of$156,800, to conduct a needs assessment. Phase I is complete. In October 2001, Fluor was issued Addendum No. 1 for Phase II for $272,000. Phase II is conceptual design for Space Allocation and Interior Renovation project, and is also complete. Phase III is to prepare plans and specifications for construction. Funding for Phase III will be requested at the appropriate time. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS Phase II of Job No. J-84, Space Allocation & Interior Renovation, is exempt from CEQA (Section 15306, Class 6). Future CEQA requirements will depend on the conceptual design recommendations. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report SP:sa G:WglobalWgenda Draft ReportsVDDNR JA4 060602.dm w..ea: ermoi Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SPACE ALLOCATION & INTERIOR RENOVATION JOB NO. J-84 (Phase I & 11) ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 3,200 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 g; $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 22,000 100% Studies/Permitting $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 17,354 87% Design Staff $ 37,300 $ 238,000 $ 238,000 $ 238,000 1 $ 238,000 $ 68,462 29% Consultant PSA $ 156,800 $ 428,800 $ 34,200 $ 463.000 $ 428,800 $ 34,200 $ 463,000 $ 339,321 73% Construction Contract Construction Administration Construction Inspection Contingency $ 47,000 $ 87,000 $ 34,200 $ 52,800 ' - $ (34,200) $ 52,800 TOTAL $ 244.300 $ 795.800 $ - $ 795,800 $ 708,800 $ - $ 795,800 $ 447.137 56% G%wp r la%engV2glpaleAJ-84 Space Allocalion 8 Ialenor Ren0valion\IJ-84,411 Budget Tableals)Di5Vic19 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Space Allocation and Interior Renovation Job No. J-84 Total Project Budget: $795.800 Consultant: Fluor Signature Services Start Date of Project: March 26, 2001 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs March Original PSA Phase I — Needs Assessment, to define $156,800 $156,800 2001 (Phase I) and outline the project for implementing interior renovation, incorporating the current spacing needs, and a vision to change the culture/environment at Plant No. 1. October Addendum 1 Phase II — Conceptual Design for site $272,000 $428,800 2001 (Phase II) improvements, architectural concepts, interior renovation and space utilization. Pending Addendum 2 Expands Phase II Scope of Work by $34,200 $463,000 adding: • Boardroom Conceptual Design • Furniture Inventory for Information Technology • Program addition of Construction Management and PMO HAwp.dtsWng%J0BS S CONTRACTW.84 Space Allomeon 8 Interior RenovadonU-84 PSA Status Repod.doc ( PDC COMMITTEE Meetlrg Date To Bd of Dlr. as/os/Bz os/xs/zz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDO0243 15(m) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Morris Ying, Engineer SUBJECT: ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PARSONS ENGINEERING SCIENCE, INC., FOR AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB. NO. J-35-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc., for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, providing for Construction Support Services in the amount of $965,264, for a total amount not to exceed $3,270,744. SUMMARY • Two addenda have been issued over the past two years that have increased the scope of design effort required for this project. Since the final design phase started in May 2001, the project has become more complex due to added process control and instrumentation upgrades. • Staff has determined that additional consultant support will be required during the bidding, construction, and closeout periods. The complexity and duration of the project were not known at the beginning of the design phase, therefore, it was determined to wait until after the final design was completed to negotiate construction phase services with the Consultant. • Proposed Addendum No. 3 includes the following construction support services: assistance during bidding, attending weekly progress meetings, assisting Staff in responding to requests for Information/clarification from the contractor, preparation of plan changes, change orders, equipment tagging, reviewing contractor submittals, preparing record drawings, and providing startup support operations and maintenance manuals as described in the Additional Information section of this report. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total project budget for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, is $29,345,000. Authorization of an additional $965,264 is being requested for the Consultant Professional Services Agreement, increasing the total authorization to $3,270,744, which is approximately 5% of the estimated construction cast. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8—Page 140) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. �W: e¢a•e Page 1 t ❑ Not applicable (information item) Transfer of funds is being requested from Contingency to Consultant PSA. The overall Budget is not being increased. Please see the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The Orange County Sanitation District's (District)action plan to comply with NFPA 820, Standard for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities resulted in the release of the initial Area Classification Study for both Plants. The preliminary engineering for the Area Classification Study for Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, was completed in August 1999 by Brown and Caldwell. The report provided the basis for an implementation plan to make modifications to existing facilities to meet NFPA 820 requirements. In May 2000, the District issued a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Parsons Engineering Science, Inc., for the final design of Job No. J-35. Addendum No. 3 with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. consists of several additional work items: 1. Bidding Assistance/Evaluate Alternative Equipment: This item provides assistance to the District with the evaluation of contractor(bidder) proposed alternative material or equipment. The additional cost of this item is$13,582. 2. Shop Drawing Submittal Review: This item provides technical review of contractor submitted shop fabrication drawings for compliance with the project specifications and drawings. The additional cost of this item is$104,376. 3. Assist Staff in Responding to Requests for Information (RFI): This item prepares responses to contractor's questions regarding interpretation of specifications and drawings. The additional cost of this item is$67,945. 4. Prepare Backup Materials for Plans Changes/Field Change Orders: This item prepares the necessary drawings and specifications required to describe a change to the project design so that contractor may propose a cost and schedule for the change. The additional cost of this item is $132,077. 5. Attend Weekly Progress Meetings: This item is to attend weekly progress meetings with the District staff and the contractor. The additional cost of this item is$73,762. 6. Attend Miscellaneous Meeting: This item is to attend meetings that may be required to resolve difficulties encountered in the plant during the construction of the project. The additional cost of this item is $49,948. 7. Prepare Formal Revision Contract Documents for Change Orders: This item is to support the District in the preparation of formal revision to contract (bid) documents. The additional cost of this item is$16,624. 8. Review Contractor As-Built Data Sheet for All Equipment on P&ID's: This item is to review the contractor input to the equipment data sheets to insure completeness and accuracy. The additional cost of this item is$40,872. A.,,.ee: vmrse Page 2 1 9. Prepare As-Built Control Loop Diaorams:This item is to random quality control review of contractor generated instrumentation control loop diagrams. The additional cost of this item is$11,325. .. 10. Conversion of P &ID's to PDS 2D and Incorporate Contractor's PI&D Redlines: This item is to incorporate contractors marked up as-built Piping and Instrument Diagrams and conversion of those drawings into updated CAD format, The additional cost of this item is$111,746. 11. Prepare Record Drawings: This item Is to prepare the final record drawings for archiving based upon the contractor's marked up as-built drawings approved by the District. The additional cost of this Item is$99,092. 12. Assist in Start-up. Initial Operation and of Facilities: This item is to provide assistance in the initial commissioning and operation of the District facilities. The additional cost of this item is $49,891. 13. Prepare New and Make Revisions to Operations and Maintenance Manuals: This tem is to be determined to comply with additional future Operation and Maintenance Division needs. 14. Develop and Operator and Maintenance Training Manual and Program for SOP: This item is to be determined to comply with additional future Operation and Maintenance Division needs. 15. Project Management: This item provides additional management of the Parsons Engineering Sciences' engineering sciences assigned to the project and single-point contact with the District. The additional cost of this item is $122,069. The subtotal additional cost items are $893,309. Additional profit of$71,955 is calculated at 8.3%. The total additional cost Including profit is$965,264. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 3, which provides for construction support services throughout the 34-month construction phase of the project, increasing the contract amount $965,264, for a total amount not to exceed $3,270,744. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives to the mandated Area Classification Studies and Implementation Plan are available. This project is necessary to ensure compliance with OSHA safety requirements as defined by the National Electrical Code. CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt from CEQA. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report MCY:sa G:InlgloballAgenda Daft ReportWOMAt J-35-2 060602a.duc w.+..a: erzaw Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Area Classification Study and Implementation Plan JOB NO. J-35-2 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT (BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Protect Development $ 131,911 $ 106,000 $ 106,000 $ 106,000 $ 106,000 $ 79,443 75% Studies/Permitting $ 920,876 $ 682,000 $ 682,000 $ 682,000 $ 682,000 $ 662,589 97% Consultant PSA $ 2.825,000 $ 3,107,000 1 $168.000 $ 3.276,000 1 $ 2.305,480 $ 965.264 $ 3,270,744 $ 2.290,508 70% Design Staff $ 529.000 $ 638.000 $ 638,000 $ 638,000 $ 638,000 $ 352,838 55% Construction Contract $ 17,242,000 $ 18,242,000 $ 18,242,000 $ Construction Administration $ 656,000 $ 656,000 $ 656,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 662.000 $ 662,000 $ 662,000 $ lContingency 1 $ 4,962,000 $ 5,252,000 $168,000 $ 5.084,000 Is PROJECT TOTAL $ 27,918,787 1 $ 29,345,000 1 $ - $ 29,345.000 1 1 $ 3,731,480 $ 965,264 $ 4,696.744 1 $ 3,385.378 1 72% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 27,918.787 1 $ 29,345.000 1 $ - 1 $ 29,345,000 $ 3.731,480 1 $ 966.264 $ 4.696.744 1 $ 3,385,378 72% GA"AlalengU088 4 CONTRACTSU35-24J-3S2 Budge IMolmBlbn Table 20020429.xislDisldcls Professional Services Agreement Status Report Area Classification Study and Implementation Plan Job No. J-35-2 Total Project Budget: $29,345,000 Consultant: Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Start Date of Project: May 24, 2000 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Area Classification Study Implementation 5/24/00 Original PSA Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 $2,255,680 $2,255,680 12/20/00 1 Test Digester Value Engineering $24,900 $2,280,580 1/21/02 2 Addition one utility PLC and six remote $24,900 $2,305,480 I/O's for Plant No. 2 PENDING 3 Construction Support Services $965,264 $3,270.744 GAwp.dWWnBU08S&CONTRACTSU-35-2U-35-2 PSA Status ReportAdd 3.doc 05/15/02 ReWsed 12H8I01 PDC COMMITTEE M wre Tase.oro1 oWoo/oz a/zs/o2 AGENDA REPORT 'ren Nu bef 1eiiNin1Off vocoz-0a ssmt Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Andrei loan SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION, CONTRACT NO. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, providing for additional engineering services, authorizing staff to reallocate funds for an amount not to exceed $784,769, with no increase in the total contract amount of$3,807,047. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District (District) awarded Brown and Caldwell a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)to prepare the final construction documents for the realignment of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) on August 23, 2000. • Due to the increasing project budget estimate and concems of Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), the City of Yorba Linda, and nearby residents, the final design of the SARI was put on hold, as directed by the Steering Committee on March 28, 2001. The Steering Committee also directed Staff to evaluate other options to protect/relocate the pipeline. Brown and Caldwell evaluated 20 different alternatives and prepared a Technical Memorandum (TM) comprising engineering data for each option. The TM was reviewed by an expert panel and the 20 alternatives were graded based on the likelihood and consequences of failure. • Addendum No. 3 is for Brown and Caldwell to further develop eight alternatives that presented technical merits and warranted lower budgets. • The budget for Addendum No. 3 will be provided from the already approved, but unused PSA budget by reallocating the funds previously assigned for other individual tasks. • District and SAWPA staff are still working on refining the Scope of Work. No work will be authorized without concurrence from both agencies. Staff recommends the approval of Addendum No. 3 for an amount not to exceed $784,769 with no increase in the total PSA amount of$3,807,047. According to the March 12, 2002, Memorandum of Understanding, concerning the Protection, Repair, and/or T Relocation of a portion of the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)will reimburse the Orange County Sanitation Distdct (District) 50% of this cost, not to exceed $400,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No additional authorization is being requested at this time. The previous authorization is sufficient for the proposed Addendum No. 3. The current not to exceed amount will not be increased. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: (Page 14, section 8, FY 2001-2002) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No increase on the project budget is being requested. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background In August 2000, the District awarded Brown and Caldwell a Professional Service Agreement(PSA)to prepare the construction documents for relocation of the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI). This design, also known as Alternative D, consisted of completely relocating the pipeline out of the Santa Ana River. The PSA awarded was a not to exceed amount of$3,332,829. In December 2000, the District issued Addendum No. 1 to the PSA with Brown and Caldwell for an additional not to exceed amount of$474,218. Addendum No. 1 provided for additional engineering work related to the preparation of right-of-way documents, additional geotechnical services, and review of an alternative pipeline alignment proposed by the SAWPA. In August 2001, Addendum No. 2 was issued to Brown and Caldwell to evaluate 20 other realignment1protection alternatives and to conduct a peer review by an expert panel. The expert panel workshop took place in March 2002. Addendum No. 2 was for $688,000. However, no additional budget was required. The work was funded from the existing unused budget by reallocating funds between tasks. Brown and Caldwell prepared a Technical Memorandum analyzing the 20 alternatives at planning level. G%n dW`apmdal&v'd Ap ReCn 02B fd ApnyRBpv6'M VN INn12J1 EK R—. a Otl Page 2 W Based on the outcome of the Technical Memorandum and the expert panel workshop, Staff from the District, SAWPA, Orange County Public Facilities Resources Department (PFRD), and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) selected eight alternatives for further analyses. The engineer's Scope of Work for developing the eight alternatives, along with the fee estimate for this effort, were presented to the Joint Management Committee (JMC) on May 21, 2002. The JMC concurred with Staffs proposal and recommended the approval of Addendum No. 3 Scope of Work and engineering fees. ALTERNATIVES Turn the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection (SARI) project over to PFRD and USACE. CEQA FINDINGS An Environmental Impact Report was certified on July 18, 2001 by the Board of Directors, and a Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 2001, for the relocation of the SARI (Option No. 3, formerly'D"). Additional requirements may need to be addressed if another alternative is recommended. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report Al:sa GMtglobaMgenda Draft Report \PDOAR 2.41 AR 060602.dao G.. .deWmftr 4ma RBgM.WQm NAgm �mm IW ).2i1.dw RW..e: WWI Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR REALIGNMENT AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2.41 �ipds10D ge I tl �fS q4q� nr' Sit ; Ekp If k yY: �$ �'DprfTd �tizd4�oN f b Y t9• l�C�.�, ` '� d .t 5�s� � r: r2.- 1 j �I v�'Brtnr � r a u e���L �. .fir. G.f'. ,i, v: •' l? 4 Project Development $ 17,000 $ 8.000 $ 8,000 +< $ 17,000 $ 17,000 $ 12,138 71% nl Studles/Pemittlng $ 727000 $ 727.000 ';' $ 1.122000 $ 1,122.000 $ 544385 49% Consultant PSA $ 875,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 8,000 000 $ 4,606,273 $ 4,606.273 $ 3,011002 67% Design Staff $ 368200 $ 1,506,000 $ 1,506.000 $ 831,000 $ 831,000 $ 485.835 58% Construction Contract $ 21,203,400 $ 54.004 000 $ 54 004,000 Emergency repairs$ maintenance Construction Administration $ 1.262.300 $ e 575 000 $ 6,675.000 a` Construction Inspection $ 11718,000 $ 3,315,000 $ 3,315.000 Easement acquisition Contingency $ 6088,400 $ 10 200 000 $ 10,200.000 $ 600,000 PROJECT TOTAL $ 30,530,300 1 $ 64,335.000 1 1$ 84,335.000 ,'' $ 7,176,273 $ 6,576,273 $ 4,138,480 83% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 30.530.300 1 $ 84.335.000 $ 84,335,000 $ 7,176,273 $ 6,576,273 $ 4,136,460 63% W37NO72 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection Contract No. 2-41 Total Project Budget: $84,335,000 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Start Date of Project: September 4, 2000 Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs 8/23/00 Original PSA Design Relocation and Protection, and $3,332,829 $3,332,829 Abandonment of The Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-41 12/20/01 Addendum No.1 Provide additional engineering services $474,218 $3,807,047 including subsurface investigation, preparing a comprehensive report on the alignment submitted by SAWPA, preparing all documents necessary to acquire 69 easements. 6/27/01 Addendum No.2 Provide additional engineering services $688,000 $3,807,047 including the evaluation of additional The project budget options to relocate/protect SARI, will be reallocated performing a risk assessment study and to provide for Add. preparing a short and long-term pipeline No. 2 cost. maintenance program. Pending Addendum No.3 Provide additional engineering services to $784,769 further analyze eight of 20 Reallocate already $3,807,047 realignment/protection options. approved budget AI:sa 003733875 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To or D,I. 6/O6/02 6/26/02BId. AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number voco2-45 is o Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Larry Rein, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, JOB NO. 1-2-4 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve plans and specifications for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file letter dated May 14, 2002,from Colich & Sons, L.P., the apparent low bidder, requesting to be relieved from their bid due to a mathematical error; (4)Approve the request of Colich & Sons, L.P. for release from their bid; (5)Adopt report of General Counsel dated June 10, 2002, pursuant to California Public Contracts Code Section 5101(b), establishing facts by which release from its bid is granted to Colich & Sons, L.P.; (6) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (7)Award a construction contract to Steve P. Rados, Inc., for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, for an amount not to exceed $30,003,210. SUMMARY • This project will correct the hydraulic deficiencies identified in the 1999 Strategic Plan, as well as the structural deficiencies identified through an inspection program. • The project is located within the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley, and in Bushard Avenue between Ellis Avenue and Banning Road, Banning Road between Bushard Avenue and Brookhurst, and Brookhurst between Banning Road and Plant No. 2. The project consists of four miles of 108" sewer pipe. • The plans and specifications were completed by Boyle Engineering in March 2002. Four Addenda were issued during the bid period that made miscellaneous clarifications and modifications. Sealed bids were received on May 9, 2002. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget $36,186,000 Construction Budget $28.322,000 Engineer's Estimate $28,322,000 Low Bid $28.785,747 Low Responsive Bid $30,003,210 High Bid $40,516,440 Number of Bids 9 • The low bidder, Colich & Sons, L.P., sent notification within five days of bidding that they had made an error in their bid and requested to be relieved of their bid. Staff has reviewed this notification and recommends Colich & Sons, L.P. be relieved of their bid. Page 1 • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to the second •/ low bidder, Steve P. Rados, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $30,003,210 and authorization of funds for construction administration and inspection. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$30,003,210 for the construction contract and $3,117,000 for construction administration and inspection is being requested. The authorization is within the project's budget for FY2001/02, as amended by Board action February 27, 2002. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for more Information. BUDGET IMPACT The FY2001/02 budget was increased by$2,480,000 by Board action February 27, 2002. The item is within this budget; allocation of funds from Contingency to Construction funds in the amount of$1,682,000 is necessary. ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line Item FY2001/02, Section 8, Page 52:Capital Improvement Program, Collections Facilities, Sushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 1-2-4, as amended February 27, 2002) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The existing Bushard Trunk Sewer needs to be replaced as quickly as possible due to its deteriorated condition. The new Bushard Trunk Sewer will also provide additional hydraulic capacity for managing flows. The Bushard Trunk Sewer will relieve the Interplant Sewer, and increase the ability to divert flows from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 by intercepting the Magnolia Trunk Sewer flows and the Knott Interceptor flows. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives were considered. CEQA FINDINGS This project was Included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. Additional CEQA documentation for the project was included in Addendum No. 3 to the EIR approved on December 19, 2001. This Addendum will not change CEQA findings. ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter from Colich & Sons dated May 14, 2002 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Memo from General Counsel dated June 10, 2002 4. Budget Information Table LR:jo:sa G.\wp.dtatagenda%PDC%2002Wgenda Repons\0245.1-21-062602.REVISED.doc Page 2 d Colich & Sons, L.P. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 547 WEST 140m STREET GARDENA.CALIFORNIA 902W TELEPHONE FAX (323)7762920 (310)3291532 Tuesday, May 14, 2002 Mr. David Ludwin Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728.8127 PROJECT: Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4,Treatment plant to Ellis Avenue SUBJECT: Notice of Mistake in Bid and Request for Relief as reported by telephone at 9:05 am,Tuesday, May 14,2002 to Mr. John Linder Dear Sir. Colich & Sons respectfully presents this letter to the Orange County Sanitation District as: 1. The notice to you under the Caldomia Public Contract Code Section 5100 at. Seq_, that Colich & Sons, L.P. made the mistake described below in the preparation of its bid for the project named above, and, 2. The request of Colich & Sons, L.P. to be relieved of its bid and to have its bid bond released. The mistake made the bid materially different than it was intended to be. The mistake was made in filling out the bid, it was not due to an error in judgement, to carelessness in inspecting the jobsite or to carelessness in reading the plans and specifications. Our chief estimator, Mike Ireland totaled this bid on his computer and the unit items of the bid were filled out to complete a total above the Add/Deduct line. Al this time the total in the bid for RCP Pipe materials was $0,000,000.00. Approximately three minutes before bid dosing a pipe cut was called in to our office by a manufacturer. We have discovered that simultaneously Mr. Ireland and an assistant Mr. Jayson tau took the pipe cut of$900,000.00 and both entered it in to the computer program. This meaning that the cut had been entered twice and that the pipe from the supplier was $7,100,000.00 and Colich & Sons, L.P. only had $6,200,000.00 in its bid. This clerical error makes the bid from Colich& Sons, L.P. incorrect and our correct total should be $900,000.00 higher at$29.685.747.00. Unfortunately this error is too large for Colich &Sons, L.P.to absorb on this project. We shall provide additional information or documentation upon your request Sincerely, Colich�LP. _ Mr. Ted Polichh President, Coretco, Inc., G.P. , <� May 9, 2002 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA NOS. 1, 2, 3, &4 BID TABULATION BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION JOB NO.1-2-4 Engineer's Estimate: $28,322,000 Construction Contract Budget: $28,322,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Colich & Sons, L.P. $ 28,785,747 2. Steve P. Rados, Inc. $ '30,003,210 3. Steve Bubalo Construction Co. $ 31,877,190 4. J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. $ 34.502,718 5. Utah Pack Construction Co. $ '35,016.755 6. Colich Construction, L.P. $ 36,500,740 7. Valverde Construction, Inc. $ 36,842,678 8. Ken Thompson Inc. $ '36,733,000 9. Mladen Buntich Construction Co. $ 40,516,440 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project. The low bidder Colich & Sons, L.P., request withdrawal of their bid due to an error. The second low bidder is a responsible bid. I therefore, recommend allowing Colich & Sons, L.P. to withdrawal their bid and award to Steve P. Rados, Inc. in the amount of$30,003,210 as the lowest and best bid. 'Corrected amount. Steve P. Rados, Inc. incorrect total was $30,033,210. 'Corrected amount. Utah Pacific Construction Co incorrect total was $35,616,755. 'Corrected amount. Ken Thompson Inc. incorrect total was $37,000,000. d��A— David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering O9wp.dlalengV201arelil-24 Bid Tab.dm Revised 05/19/98 OOSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 9272MI27 • (714) 962-2411 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION t .. MEMORANDUM TO; Chairman and Members of the Board Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: June 10, 2002 RE: Award of Contract—Job Number 1-2-4 The action requested of your Board is to relieve Colich & Sons, LP from its bid, due to mathematical errors, and to award the bid to the second low responsible bidder. It is the recommendation of Staff and this Office that the request of Colich & Sons, LP be granted for the reasons set forth below. For public works contracts the District, as with most public agencies, must proceed on the basis of a published notice inviting bids and requiring all proposals to be submitted at a time certain in a sealed package. The governing state law prohibits any bidder from being relieved of its bid or to change its bid without the consent of the awarding authority. California Public Contracts Code, however, does allow a bidder to request relief upon proof of mistake and compliance by the contractor with the notice requirements to the agency. The bidder must establish: 1. A mistake was made; 2. It gave the District written notice within five (5) days after opening of the bids specifying in detail how the mistake occurred; 3. The mistake made its bid materially different than it intended; 4. The mistake was made in filling out the bid. Within five (5) days of the bid opening, the District was notified by Colich & Sons, LP that it had made a serious error in the final preparation of the bid which it submitted and requested relief pursuant to Public Contracts Code. Upon receipt of the request, the Engineering Department and this Office undertook an investigation, which included inquiring of the pipe supplier who provided the component item that was mistakenly entered by Colich. Additionally, we personally met with representatives of Colich & Son, LP, including the President and the Chief Estimator who prepared the proposal. Lastly, we examined the 100+ pages of computer calculations leading to a submittal. Based upon all of the above, we are satisfied that an adjustment in the cost price submitted by the pipe supplier to Colich was In fact erroneously deducted twice within a few minutes of the bid submittal, resulting in an error of$900,000. .an and Board June 10, 2002 Page 2 1 It is our opinion that this was a clear and honest mistake in the preparation of the bid and is valid basis for the Board to grant relief to the bidder. By granting relief the District has two options—namely, to award the contract to the second low bidder or to reject all bids and start the process anew. It is the Staffs recommendation that the award be made to the second low bidder. If the determination of the Board is to grant this relief, one of the requested action items for your Board is to adopt a report, and it is recommended that it approve and adopt this report of your General Counsel as the report required by Public Contracts Code Section 5101(b) establishing the facts by which the relief is granted. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:jIo cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. D. A. Ludwin Ms. P. Kyle ,an end Boss BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 7.800 $ 74.000 $ - $ 74.000 $ 72.871 $ 72.871 $ 72,871 100% Studies/Permitting $ 15.002 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 4,976 $ 4.976 $ 4,976 100% Consultant PSA $ 260,900 $ 1,550.000 $ - $ 1,550.000 $ 1.546,803 $ $ 1,546,803' $ 1.419,528 92% Design Staff $ 790,824 $ 284.000 $ 284,000 $ 208.000 $ 288.000 $ 155,039 54% Construction Contract $ 21,217.321 $ 28,322,000 $ 1.682.000 $ 30.004.000 $ 30,003,210 $ 30,003,210 0% Construction Administration $ 1,049.624 $ 1.199,000 $ 1,199.000 $ 1,199.000 $ 1,199,0D0 0% Construction Inspection $ 1.913,106 $ 1,918,000 $ 1,918,000 $ 1,918,000 $ 1,918,000 0% Contingency $ 7.548.924 $ 2,833,000 3 (1.682,000) $ 1.151,000 $ PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 32.803,501 1 $ 36.186.000 1 $ - IS 36.186,000 $ 1,912,650 $ 33,120.210 $ 35.032,860 $ 1,652,414 5% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 32.803,501 1 $ 36,186,000 $ - I $ 36.186,000 11 $ 1.912.650 1$ 33.120,210 1 $ 35.032,860 $ 1.652,414 1 57 'Includes PSA with DGA for Project Report and Engineering Services,and PSA with Tran Consulting Engineers for Sewer Pipeline InspeclioMEvalualion. G:\wp.dta\eng\720\rein\I-2AAPsa-AgeMa RptlConslruclion AwarcNbudget lablel-24 4-18-02xIs1Districts Fwm RavmaE W 4,2000 a I Draft MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, June 12, 2002, 2002, 590 p.m. A meeting of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee ofthe Orange County Sanitation District was held on June 12, 2002, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as bllows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Brian Brady, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Roy Moore,Vice Chair Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Brian Donahue Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General John M. Gullixson Manager Mark Leyes Mike White, Controller Joy Neugebauer Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager James W. Silva Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Absent: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel Don McLean, Broker of Record Mike Moreland, Financial Auditor Greg Giles, Financial Auditor Toby Weissert Randy Fuhrman Doug Korthof Jan Vandersloot Larry Porter Don McGee (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Doug Korthoff, Jan Vandersloot, Larry Porter, Don McGee and Randy Fuhrrnan spoke to the Committee regarding ocean discharge issues. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Nbeting Page 2 June 12, 2002 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair reported that Director RoyMoore had been appointed the Vice Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance, Gary Streed, referred the Directors to additional information distributed to them that evening on the worker's compensation insurance that would be discussed later in the evening. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. 18) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not present. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff reported that his office had filed a Demurrer to the new petition for Writ of Mandate regarding Crow Winthrop, and the case was assigned to a new judge. The judge sustained the Districts Demurrer, without leave to amend. General Counsel expects, however, Plaintiff will appeal this case as well. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The Chair ordered that the May 8, 2002 minutes for the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved, as mailed. b. FAHR02-50: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of May 2002. C. FAHR02-51: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. d. FAHR02-52: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of May 29, 2002. e. FAHR02-53: Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. f. FAHR02-54: Recommend to the Board of Directors to increase the Temporary Employment Services authorization by an additional $250,000, increasing the authorized amount from $1,300,000 to $1,550,000 for the remainder of FY 01-02. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee rketing Page 3 June 12, 2002 Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for Items specified as 10(a) through (t) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR02-55: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve proposed Operating, Capital, Debt/COP Service and Self-Insurance Budgets for 2002-03, as follows: Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $65,421,200 Worker's Compensation Self Insurance 429,000 General Liability and Property Self-Insurance 2,429,500 Collection System Operating 15,135,000 Capital Improvement Program 154,400,000 Debt/COP Service 38,995,000 Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reviewed the basic elements of the proposed FY 02103 Budget. He reported that staf would be recommending that Budget "B", which includes disinfection of the effluent, be adopted. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. FAHR02-56 Review with the independent financial auditors, Moreland & Associates, the Committee's expectations for the 2001-02 audit, and provide them with special direction, if appropriate. Gary Streed reported that the lnancial policies had been included in the agenda report. He then recogniard Mike Moreland, the District's auditor, who described the steps he would undertake to begin the annual audit process and asked or any specific direction the Committee would like him to take. Directors asked questions regarding auditing processes and areas that should be looked at in closer detail and tested ibr compliance. Mr. Moreland suggested that it was not unusual or an organization the size of the District to have an internal audit team and to have certain areas to be reviewed periodically over a period of years. He also stated he could provide those services if the Committee directed him to do so. Mr. Moreland also suggested the Committee determine a long-term plan ofthe areas that should be routinely tested and audited or compliance with the District's policies and procedures. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 June 12, 2002 Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to direct staff to prepare a cost analysis regarding an internal v. external audit team, and to understand the pros and cons of an internal v. an outside audit team, and present that analWis to the FAHR Committee in Julyor August. C. FAHR02-57 Rescind February 13, 2002 direction to staff to schedule a special Directors'workshop regarding audits. Gary Streed reported that last month the FAHR Committee directed staff to obtain two pamphlets prepared bythe GFOA. These brochures will be included in the agenda package for the June 26' meeting. Mr. Streed also suggested that, as previously requested, a special Directors'workshop regarding audits might not be needed any longer. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to include this request into a discussion of internal audit function, and a comparison of internal and external costs of audit functions be prepared by staff and presented to the FAHR Committee at a Lture meeting. d. FAHR02-58 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02- , Establishing a Joint Financing Agreement with the Placentia-Yorba Linda School District for Capital Facilities Capacity Charges,for an estimated amount of$742,000. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to not consider this item until the July 101° FAHR Committee meeting, to allowthe Yorba Linda City Council to consider and review this request. e. FAHR02-59 Recommend to the Board of Directors to renew the Districts All-Risk Property and Earthquake Insurance Program for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003, in an amount estimated not to exeed $1,300,000. Don McLean, the District's insurance broker, gave a brief report and reviewed the current market for all-risk and earthquake insurance, as well as the preliminary premium estimates. Final premium quotations will be available at the Board meeting. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors with the actual premium to be determined at the Board meeting. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meting Page 5 June 12, 2002 f. FAHR02-60 Recommend to the Board of Directors to renew the District's Excess General Liability Insurance Program for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003, in an amount estimated not to e)ceed $205,000 Don McLean, the District's insurance broker, reported on the e)cess general liability insurance market and the large rate increases that are being seen across the board, as well as the preliminary premium estimates. Final premium quotations will be available at the Board meeting. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors with the actual premium to be determined at the Board meeting. (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR02-61 Secondary Treatment Capacity Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager, described the current secondarytreatment capacity available at both treatment plants, the methodologyof planning for capacity, and the need for additional capacity. He also reviewed the capital improvement projects for the existing secondary treatment facilities. Directors expressed concern over the decisions the Board must make on the level of treatment without sufficient time to review and discuss all of the major areas of concern and impact this decision has, and suggested that the tentative decision date on the level of treatment be delayed for at least one month, and possiblyhave another special board meeting prior to making their decision. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled br July 10, 2002 at 5 p.m. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Maeting I Page 6 June 12, 2002 (16) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 7:36 p.m. pursuant to Go\emment Code Section 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item No. 16(a)(1). Confdential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee ha\e been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There was no reportable action taken bythe Committee re Agenda Item No. 16(a)(1). At 8:00 p.m., the Committee recomened in regular session. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Submitted by Penny M. I yle FAHR Committee Secreta ry GAwp.dtatadmintBStFAHRte5W2 Crap FAHR MlnuO .dw I Meetlng FAHR COMMITTEE Date To Be.or .Dir. elt2/az e/zwoz I-� AGENDA REPORT [FAR 2-50 [te 16(c) r FAHumbe Nu Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 2002 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of May 2002. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report, the District is holding a United Airlines (UAL)Asset Backed Security that carried an acceptable credit rating at the time of purchase. Since that time, the rating from Moody's has fallen twice,first from A3 to BA1, and then to BA3. Also, the security rating from Standard & Poor's fell once from A-to BBB. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if this security was sold. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of"credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. G\wp.EldldpenLalloa,C AgenEa Repab =B 1 Agmd.R¢p0"SW Mll m161111RE SRK 4CC Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ' r ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. On May 21, the sum of$22.8 million was received from the Orange County Tax Collector's seventh property tax apportionment for fiscal year 2001-02, and was deposited into the State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts May 31,2002 Yield(%) State of Call.LAW $ 30.400.964 2.74 Union Bank Checking Account 447,508 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,878.000 1.08 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 43,329,494 3.90 PIMCO-Long-tam Portfolio 360,112,258 4.40 Debt Service Reserves w/rrustees 35,170,146 4.28 Petty Cash 5.000 N/A TOTAL $471.34'1.3Bo G\ry.4anpeMaYANInFAXR300NU]3 P n.flep>t MN THE SF Goc Paget ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:Ic amroai.rgan WMMFAHuoDr Ale ftp WDWTRFA ".E Page 3 rr rrr rrr ' ' " ' " ' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,,,,,,,,,,,�„��,�„ uuumommoi IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I •t'.JJJJJJ J. r r rrr rrr :::::::Rik: _ r rrr rrr : :";•:: �. rr rrr rrr •, r r r r rrr ■e: ::::� :_i::i: ::: i::': �:::::<::::::: is?: :: ::'• i::: ::: : i III Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund May 1, 2002 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance May 1,2002 $20,100,964 $20,100,964 $20,100,964 2.74 2.74 Deposits: 5/21/2002 22,800,000 22,800,000 22,800,000 2.74 2.74 5/24/2002 400,000 400,000 400,000 2.74 2.74 Total Deposits 23,200,000 23,200,000 23,200,000 2.74 2.74 Withdrawals: 5/1/2002 (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) 2.74 2.74 5/8/2002 (6,900,000) (6,900.000) (6,900,000) 2.74 2.74 5/15/2002 (1,200,000) (1,200,000) (1,200,000) 2.74 2.74 5/22/2002 (1,300,000) (1,300,000) (1,300,000) 2.74 2.74 5/29/2002 (1,800,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 2.74 2.74 Total Withdrawls (12,900,000) (12,900,000) (12,900,000) 2.74 2.74 Balance May 31,2002 $30,400,964 $30,400,964 $30,400,964 2.74 2.74 MONTHLY REPORT - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING ((or the month ended 31 May 2002) Page I of 2 Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $43,802,016 • Mellon $43,798,886 Historiml Cost: • PIMCO $44,067,146 • Mellon $44,071,593 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.23 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact airvloss of 1%Change: $100745 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 74 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Avernstre Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA," 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Com limm" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.19 0.15 3 Months: 0.60 0.44 12 Months: 3.37 2.63 Year-to-Date: 0.97 0.73 Commentary Inlerasleams m the shW-c.4 of the yield cunt incurred a slight decreafeduringthe month(3- thT-Bias fell 4 buss points m 1.72),while longer maturlllesexpedmceda slight increase(30-yearTmasurlesrme2 buffs points to 5.61%). • The Liquid P0m10 io outperformed dm bcnchmuk by 4 buts points during Use recent,and by 24 basis p0ims year4c-due. • 1`11s100's emphasism higheryieldingsecurinusuch as cmnmercialpaperaed sxdt mes eManeedrt ms. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 3/ May 2002) Page 1 of 2 Compliance Issues: None. Split Rated Securities Still in Compliance: • $85,000 par of Ford Motor Credit note (345397RS4) 6.55%coupon,9/10/2002 maturity, representing 0.2%of the portfolio holdings-this security was downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+; the issue now carries a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade(from A2) on 1/16/2002. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. L:Ip.6MydV]OIMINIIkuvyApnNfQ�IOPOl-OJ.PFT.dx MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT LNVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 31 May 2002) Page I of l Long-Term Operating Monies(103) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $363,273,558 • Mellon $363,134,916 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $356,262,000 • Mellon $354,600,912 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 1.99 Of Index: 2.46 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact in/loss of 1%change: $7 229 144 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 38% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Avenge Portfolio Credit Quality: AA+ 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No' 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 0.64 0.77 1 Month: 1.33 1.14 3 Months: 6.37 7.10 12 Months: Year-to-Date: 2.55 2.06 • Thmmonlh yields declined slightly during the month(90day T-Bills fell basis points to 1.725:)as did long malurides(5-yerr Treasury Holes fell bawls poinu W 4.35%). • The Long-Term portfolio lagged the benchmerle by 13 basis points for the month,but outperfatned the Index by 49 basis points year+odek. • Postdating the pxtfnlio with below-Index duration by PIMCO was negatve for performance w mum gar erelly fell across the yield curve. • Curve positioning was largely neutral for performance. • M underweight alloealiat to Treasuries was posithe for performance as the sector lagged during Me month. • Holding,of moagagebackd securities improved performance,as this sector benefited from increased Investor demand. • M underweight allocation to corporates was negative as this sector milled on a series of strong economic releases. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ended 31 May 2002) Page 2 of 2 -Compliance Issues: $1,600,000 par of United Airlines Pecs-Through 2001-I-C(909317BC2),6.831°/coupon,9/1/2008 maturity,representing 0.3%of the portfolio holdings-this security was purchased on 8/1 MOO1;it was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BA I (on 9/18/2001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 920/2001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BA I to BA3 on 12/212001. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. With respect to the UAL holding,PIMCO's recommendation for the issue has not changed. In their opinion,the spread,collateral,and issuer liquidity all point to continuing to hold the security. The following points provide basis for their recommendation: •foremost,PIMCO doesn't believe that UAL is going bankrupt. Almost all major US airlines have sufficient liquidity and unencumbered assets to survive today's bleak industry conditions. UAL is the second largest carrier in the world,and they believe that the company(and the industry)will survive. •secondly,the collateral is good(very young planes,medium to high aircraft diversification,loan-to-value ratio is 60-75%,etc.). •PIMCO believes liquidation values,even under the most onerous assumptions,are much higher than reflected in current market prices. Current pricing levels overstate the risks. •If the security was sold at the lowest price currently available(74.15 per IDC),the portfolio would realize a loss of$413,680(approximately 1 I basis points given the total portfolio value). However,as detailed above,PIMCO believes the fair market value of the issue is much higher than currently reflected in the market. This is a conservative loss estimate. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. If anything changes that would prompt them to revise their recommendation on the inclusion of the security within the portfolio,they will let us know to take appropriate action. ft Rated Securities$till In Compliance •$6,000,000 per of Daimler Chrysler securities(I7120QE8 and 233835AM9),with 54,500,000 maturing on December 2002 and the remaining$1.5 million maturing on August 2002,represents 1.7%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/312001 by S&P from A-to BBB+; the securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$9,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities(345397GV9,345397RV7,345397513,345397SR5),maturing at various dates in 2003,2004,and 2005,represents 2.6%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade(from A2)on 1/162002. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$11,750,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(370425QV5,37042 WE80,37042 WZKO),maturing in 2003,represents 3.3%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the securities continue to carry a Moody's rating of A2. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. G.1vp.d1.1fln11101whi1elTream,y MBmnL-7 0800-02-05.RPLdoc Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. I BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 31-MAY-2002 FINAL 61 UID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 6,510,935.43 6,510,835.43 14.87% 0.00 U.S.GOVERNMENTS-LESS THN IYR 1,449,160.17 1,449,601.57 3.31% 441.40 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 6,673,112.25 6,673,112.25 15.24% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 5,780,909.19 5,780,909.19 13,20% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 1,152,208.02 1,152,208.02 2.63% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,180,640.79 1,180,640.79 2.70% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 22,746,965.85 22,747,307.25 51.94% 441.40 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 22,746,865.85 22047,307.25 51.94% 441.40 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 6,219,531.25 6,174,360.00 14.10% 45,171.25 U.S.AGENCIES 2,647,255.89 2,638,465.00 6.02% -8,790.89 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 49,95113 50,000.00 0.11% 46.87 BANKING&FINANCE 5,933,556.24 5,926,460.63 13.30% -107,095.61 INDUSTRIAL 3,272,067.00 3,204,007.40 7.32% -68,059.60 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 1,959,734.40. 1,930,521.60 4.41% -29,212.80 UTILITY-GAS 773,227.50 758,362.50 1,73% -14,865.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 20,855,325.41 20,58ZI77.13 46.99% -273,148.29 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 20,855,325.41 20,582,177.13 46.99% -273,148.28 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 469,402.05 469,402.05 1.07% 0.00 TOTAL 469,402.05 469,402.05 1.07% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 469,402.05 469,402.05 1.07% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 44,071,593.31 43,798,886.43 100.00% -272,706.88 ItJun-1002 9:42:16 Eseculaw Workbench Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: I BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-MAY-2002 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH -9.00 -8.00 0.00% 0.00 RECEIVABLES 14,916,341.50 14,916,341.50 4.11% 0.00 PAYABLES .51,729,320.30 -51,729,320.30 -14.25% 0.00 TOTAL -36,812,996.80 -36,812,986.80 .10.14% 0.00 UNITED STATES BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 13,352.20 13,352.20 0.00% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 92,193,298.93 82,193,299.93 22.63% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES $2,206,651.13 82,206,651.13 22.64% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 45,393,664.33 45,393,664.33 12.50% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 94,909,026.51 84,964,700.89 23.40% 55,674.38 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,349,348.29 33,609,822.91 9.26% 4,260,474.62 U.S.AGENCIES 43,503,912.45 44,742,438.58 12.32% 1,238,526.13 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 16,971,077.06 17,294,428.00 . 4.76% 323,350.94 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 7,241,282.18 7,363,625.02 2.03% 122,342.84 FHLMC POOLS 2,234,045.42 2,225,540.20 0.61% -8,505.22 F14LMC MULTICLASS 3,863,773.44 3,901,214.57 1.07% 37,441.13 FNMA POOLS 25,036,601.55 25,163,281.25 6.93% 126,679.70 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 3,723,524.96 3,837,948.85 1.06% 114,423.89 ABS:CAR LOAN 466,317.62 461,493.67 0.13% 4,823.95 ABS:AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,60D,000.00 1,209,840.00 0.33% -390,160.00 BANKING&FINANCE 39,180,009.50 39,598,590.00 10.90% 408,590.50 INDUSTRIAL 27,986,405.00 27,930,265.00 7.69% -56,140.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 14,622,010.00 14,921,655.00 4.11% 299,645.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,503,750.00 2.07% 6,495.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 308,184,588.98 314,719,593.94 86.67% 6,534,004.96 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 309,184,588.99 314,718,593.94 $6.67% 6,534,004.96 11Jun-2002 9.44:13 Eucutim Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re rt PAGE: 2 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 31-MAY-2002 FINAL LONG TERMOPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,022,658.21 3,022,658.21 0.83% 0.00 TOTAL 3,022,658.21 3,022,658.21 0.83% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,022,658.21 3,022,659.21 0.83% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 356,600,911.52 363,134,916.48 100.00% 6,53/,M.96 u✓,.�-�nnz 9�d1r 13 FseeuNw WwkMw.A YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAW 3 MBF07511102 2002/05/31 RUN DATE t 06/06/02 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIM , 11.00.17 PAN VALUE YIN AT CURRENT HOODY MAXET TOTAL COST/ 9 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MEANT VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ ____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASE EOUIVALERTS 750,000.00 STUDENT LN MARRYING ASSN .000 1.792 P-1 100.000 749,558.60 3.29 863E7TM7 VAR RT 06/20/2002 DO 12/20/01 A-I+ 750,000.00 1.73 700,000.00 STUDENT IN NEW ASSN SHORT TRH .000 1.813 P-1 99.943 699,601.57 3.07 86387THL5 VAR RT 07/28/2002 DD D1117/02 A-I+ 699,601.57 1.61 1,180,640.79 DREYFUS TREASURY CASE NONE .000 1.720 AAA 100.000 11180,640.79 5.19 996085247 AAA 1,180,640.79 2.72 2,200,000.00 PRO PARK CR BR CONS DISC HIS 1.139 .000 P-1 99.745 2,194,380.53 9.64 313313ZJO HAT 07/15/2002 A-1+ 2,194,380.53 5.06 1,822,000.00 PITHEY BOMB INC DISC 1.742 .000 P-1 99.865 1,019,534.23 7.99 72447TF50 06/05/2002 1,019,534.23 4.20 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOM LH BR COMB DISC 1.753 .000 P-1 99.825 399,300.00 1.75 313385YJ9 HAT 06/21/2002 A-1+ 399,300.00 .92 360,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LR NTG CORP DISC 1.754 .000 P-1 99.752 359,107.50 1.57 313397SE4 HAT 07/12/2002 A-1+ 359,107.50 .93 755,000.00 FEDERAL ROVE LK BE CONS DISC R 1.755 .000 P-1 99.723 752,900.02 3.30 313385BL3 HAT 07/17/2002 A-1+ 752,90B.02 1.74 300,000.00 FEDERAL HATL HTG ASSN DISCOUNT 1.755 .000 P-1 99.723 299,169.75 1.31 313599ELO HAT 07/17/2002 A-1+ 299,168.75 .69 470,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN KID CORP DISC 1.755 .000 P-1 99.694 468,560.62 2.05 313397YWS HAT 07/03/2002 A-1+ 468,560.62 1.08 200,000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN HIS CORP, DISC 1.756 .000 P-1 99.679 199,350.33 .97 313397EV6 HAT 07/26/2002 A-1+ 199,356.33 .46 3,639,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL KID ASSN DISCOUNT 1.756 .ODD P-1 99.631 3,625,555.91 15.93 313589A70 HAT 08/05/2002 A-14 3,625,555.91 9.37 1,500,000.00 DO PONT DE SERUM DISC 1.762 .000 P-1 99.892 1,492,306.67 6.56 26354BF72 06/07/2002 1,498,306.67 3.46 1,500,000.00 ANBRICAN ER CR CP DISC 1.764 .000 99.795 1,496,920.00 6.58 025918GA3 07/10/2002 1,496,920.00 3.45 YLDARAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 MBF07511102 2002/05/31 RUN DATE 06/06/02 DISTRICT[ LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIT@ i 11.00.17 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BE CURB SYSTEM 1.I73 .000 P-1 99.848 299,542.75 1.31 313313YBB MAT 06/14/2002 A-1+ 299,542.75 .69 840,000.00 PRO ROSE LN MG CORD DISC MT8 1.774 .000 P-1 99.794 839,265.40 3.68 313393155 RAT 06/25/2002 A-1+ 830,265.40 1.93 700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DIED 1.794 1.804 P-1 99.756 698,294.53 3.06 63743=0 07/12/2002 598,294.53 1.61 1,262,000.00 FEDERAL E04DS LN ME CORD DISC 1.798 .000 P-1 99.572 1,256,603.55 5.52 313397826 RAT 08/00/2002 A-1+ 1,256,603.55 2.90 1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 1.804 .000 P-1 99.I70 997,700.00 4.38 63743DPA4 06/10/2002 997,700.00 2.30 145,000.00 FEDERAL FEAR OR BE COMB SYSTEM 1.006 .000 P-1 99.650 144,492.50 .63 313313ED3 MAT 07/10/2002 A-1+ 144,492.50 .33 233,000.00 PROBRAL ROVE LN MTG CORP DISC 1.668 .000 P-1 99,593 232,061.01 1.02 313397YR8 EAT 06/20/2002 A-1+ 232,061.01 .54 605,000.00 PED RCM LN RAYS CORD DISC NTS 1.942 .000 P-1 99.376 600,740.06 2.99 313397280 RAT 07/08/2002 A-1+ 680,740.06 1.57 1,972,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL SIR ASSN DISCOUNT 2.0I3 .000 P-1 99.155 1,956,184.53 8.16 313599BOS RAT 00/14/2002 A-1+ 1,056,194.53 4.28 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALSETB 1.400 .393 22,746,465.85 100.00 22,747,307.25 52.47 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 125,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MG AAM SIR .000 2.030 AAA IDO.093 124,960.94 .60 3136FOWS VAR RT 02/21/2003 DO 08/21/01 AAA 125,116.25 .29 400,000.DO LEBMAN BROS MTN 9TR 00343 .UDC 2.118 A2 100.07E 400,988.00 1.94 52513PQG9 VAR RE 07/15/2002 DO 07/12/99 A 400,312.00 .92 50,000.00 STUDENT LN MARRRTING AABM S/T .000 1.812 AAA 100.000 49,953.13 .24 86383TNM3 VAR AT 00/15/2002 AD 02/21/02 AAA 50,000.00 .12 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 3 OCSF09511102 2002/05/31 RUN DATE t 06/06/02 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 11.00.17 PAN VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MEANT TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION NICE YIELD S-P PRICE MAANRT VALUE B TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __-____-__ 1,000,000.00 - FEDERAL NOW IN BRS CONE BD 1.945 5.770 AAA 101.219 1,013,050.00 4.91 3133M82G9 5.840% 09/25/2002 OD 03/25/99 AAA 1,012,190.00 2.34 50,000.00 FEDERAL RUNS LN BR CONE BOB 1.963 5.023 AAA 100.125 50,934.50 .24 3133MBYL3 5.930% 06/14/2002 DO 06/14/99 ARA 50,062.50 .12 200,000.00 PED PARN CA BE CORE SYS NIS 2.118 4.773 AAA 100.980 203,994.00 .98 33331RD44 4.920% 10/07/2002 DO 10/07/98 ARE 201,960.00 .40 610,000.00 FEDERAL NONB LN BE CONE ADS 2.270 5.032 ARE IOl.B44 622,102.40 3.01 3133MCUE3 5.1251 01/13/2003 DO 02/12/01 AAA 621,248.40 1.43 195,000.00 FEDERAL BONE LN BM CORE BDS 2.270 5.539 AAA 102.188 199,594.20 .96 3133HQA56 5.6601 01/13/2003 DO 01/13/98 AAA 199,266.60 .46 100,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN BR CONE BDS 2.296 5.487 AAA 102.235 102,392.00 .49 3133N23D0 5.610% 01/23/2003 DO 01/23/98 AAA 102,235.00 .24 900,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PER IST 6 UP 2.329 0.351 A2 100.327 927,981.00 4.38 927804CD4 0.375% 07/01/2002 DD 07/14/92 A 902,943.00 2.02 6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 2.522 6.034 AAA 102.906 6,219,531.25 29.99 91282IJ79 06.2501 02/15/2003 DO 02/15/93 AAA 6,174,360.00 14.25 25,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RED MEN NTH 2.529 6.699 AAA 100.013 25,647.25 .12 31364CO92 6.7001 06/04/2002 DO 09/04/97 AAA 25,003.25 .06 00,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTV RARE MTH 2.562 2.269 AAA 100.030 79,600.00 .30 3136PIANO 2.200% 12/27/2002 DO 12/27/01 AAA 00,024.00 .18 250,000.00 DONALDSON LUFRIN In 00039E 2.614 6.893 AA3 102.562 257,995.00 1.24 25766CB06 0.0701 12/19/2002 DO 12/13/99 AA- 256,405.00 .59 193,000.00 PITNEY BONES CR CORP BY 2.023 8.480 AA3 103.760 203,794.49 .93 724433AR0 6.800% 02/15/2003 DO 02/12/91 AA 200,272.24 .46 555,000.00 HOUSESOLD £IN CORD NY 2.765 6.694 A2 100.093 568,475.40 2.69 441812FR9 6.000% 06/15/2002 DO 06/08/95 A 555,516.15 1.28 1501000.00 M ARI" LYNCH 3.107 6.039 AA3 102.015 155,247.00 .34 590189EP9 6.8731 02/01/2003 AA- 153,022.50 .35 545,000.00 MEMILL LYNCH&CO EYE ITR 00012 3.141 2.205 RAI 100.625 558,122.50 2.66 59018YAH3 7.250% 07/26/2002 DD 07/26/00 AA- 548,406.25 1.20 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE x 4 OCSF07511102 2002/05/31 RUN DATE 06/06/02 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 11.00.17 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT NOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ---------- 200,000.00 DEAN HITTER DISCOVER 6 CO 3.144 6.327 AA3 102.199 206,066.00 .99 24240VACS 6.825E 03/01/2003 AA- 204,398.00 .49 200,000.00 NAL MART STORES INC HT 3.159 6.840 MY 100.508 206,194.00 .93 931142BG3 6.825E 08/01/2002 OD 09/01/00 AA 201,016.00 .46 400,000.00 NATURAL RURAL UITLB COOP FIN 3.240 7.169 Al 102.803 413,064.00 1.99 630432CK9 0.375% 02/10/2003 DD 02/10/00 A+ 411,532.00 .95 325,000.00 ANERICAN GEN FIN HIS 4TR 00324 3.27E 6.536 Al 100.220 333,050.25 1.58 02635PPM9 6.SSDB 06/24/2002 DD 06/24/99 A+ 325,715.00 .35 575,000.00 PRILIP NORRIS COS NT 3.342 3.066 AI 100.836 592,927.30 2.81 718IS4BV9 7.125% 08/15/2002 DD OB/15/92 A- 579,907.00 1.34 1,100,000.00 FIRST UN CORP SUB BY 3.801 0.099 A2 100.326 1,139,714.00 5.36 33335BAM7 8.125% 06/24/2002 DD 06/24/92 A- 1,103,506.00 2.55 605,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS INC 3.006 6.334 A2 100.016 619,520.00 2.93 125569DPS 6.335% O0/01/2002 DD 07/28/97 A- 605,096.B0 I.40 200,000.00 FEDERAL BAIL HIS ASSN NTN 3.809 6.199 AAA 100.667 204,608.00 .92 31364C3N6 6.240E 07/29/2002 DD 07/29/97 HAS, 201,334.00 .46 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS NTH 4 M00405 3.853 5.720 A2 100.522 610,968.00 2.93 073928SN4 5.350E 08/12/2002 DD 02/12/01 A 603,132.00 1.39 165,000.00 NORGAE STANLEY DEAN BITTER 4.042 6.333 SAY 100.598 160,652.05 .80 617446CQ0 6.325E O9/01/2002 DD 07/28/97 NR 165,986.70 .38 1,020,000.00 SLASHER, MOSANK INS. CORP ST 4.133 5.832 SAA2 100.743 1,031,753.40 4.99 653522CQ3 5.835E 09/01/2002 DD 05/01/94 A+ 1,027,578.60 2.33 20,000.00 FEDERAL HOW IN AS CONS ADS 4.233 5.913 AAA 100.125 20,272.60 .09 3133M93B6 5.920E 06/14/2002 DD 06/14/90 AAA 20,025.00 .05 85,000.00 SURD MTR CR CO WE 4.319 6.49E A3 100.802 96,359.50 .41 345393RS4 6.550E 09/10/2002 DD 09/10/97 BBB+ 85,681.20 .20 750,000.00 PUBLIC SVC BLEC OAS 4TR 0000E 4.39E 0.111 A3 101.115 333,227.50 3.68 744560A09 7.900% 09/06/2002 DD 09/06/00 A- 358,362.50 1.35 51,000.00 MRIDIAN BANCORP INC BOB DEB 4.410 3.823 A2 100.669 52,596.30 .24 5995SOMS 7.835% 07/15/2002 DD 00/15/92 A- 51,341.19 .12 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE I 5 OCSF07511102 2002/05/31 RUN DATE s 06/06/02 DISTRICTI LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 111.00.17 PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT RUDDY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 9—P PRICE MONEY VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ ------- ------- ------- ________ ____________ __________ 155,000.00 'BRYN COX CORE NT 4.521 6.357 AA3 100.602 157,743.75 .75 06423AAC7 6.400% O8/01/2002 DO 07/22/99 A 156,057.10 .36 500,000.00 GTE CORE HEN TR 00001 4.609 6.522 A2 100.575 508,000.00 2.44 36232EAA4 6.560% 09/14/2002 DO 09/14/97 A 502,875.00 1.16 1,015,000.00 WESTINGHOUSE ELEC CORP NT 4.673 8.362 A3 100.156 I,O51r302.70 4.93 960402AP0 9.3751 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/92 A- 1,016,583.40 2.35 900,000.00 TEEACO CAP INC NEE TRS7 5.026 7.74E Al 100.414 913,563.00 4.39 9916OW33 7.7009 07/01/02 DO 06/30/92 A+ 903,726.00 2.09 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL PIEED INCOME SECURITIES 2.589 6.102 20,055,325.41 100.00 20,562,177.13 47.51 ________ _______ _________________ __—______ TOTAL 2.103 3.765 43,602,191.26 100.00 43,329,484.38 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD AMLYSIS PAGE I 6 OCSP07522202 2002/05/31 RUN DATE 06/06/02 DISTRICTS LONG-TER11 OPERATING RUN TINE , 11.00.17 PAR PRIOR YTN AT CEMENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE \ TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CUR 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 92,191,290.93 D IMS TREASURY CASE HUNT .000 1.728 AAA 100.000 62,193,298.93 91.98 996085247 MA 82,193,298.93 20.71 13,352.20 BSDT-LATE RUMP DBPOGIT ACCT .000 .100 100.000 13,352.20 .01 996097094 13,352.20 .00 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CUR EQUIVALENTS .000 1.728 82,206,651.13 100.00 82,206,651.13 20.71 FIYED INCOME SECURITIES 15,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR VERA OF HER .000 5.905 AM 101.609 15,180,351.55 4.86 OIF060669 6.0001 06/01/2017 DO 06/01/02 MA 15,241,406.25 3.86 10,000,000.00 COM19iT TO PUR PERA BP MSG .000 6.067 AAA 99.219 9,856,250.00 3.15 OIF060667 6.000% 06/01/2032 DO 06/01/02 MS 9,921,975.00 2.50 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR UNRA SF ME .000 9.600 AM 101.563 10,592,960.75 3.38 OINO62664 6.500% 06/IS/2032 DD 06/01/01 AM 10,664,115.00 2.61 7,500,000.00 ARMORER EDUCE CUB INC MT .000 6.750 At 100.000 7,646,250.00 2.38 035229AY9 6.7501 06/01/2005 DO 06/05/95 A+ 7,500,000.00 1.99 900,000.00 BEM BTEMNS ME 1 TR 00459 .000 2.208 A2 100.093 $99,406.00 .20 07392OVC6 MTG AT 12/01/2003 DO 09/17/01 A 900,037.00 .23 1,200,000.00 CMMIT TO FOR G MA lI JUMBOS .000 7.166 AM 104.689 1,251,000.00 .39 218072660 7.5001 06/20/2032 DD 06/01/01 MS 1,256,250.00 .32 4,500,000.00 DAINLCR CHRYSLER NA CORP FT .000 2.757 A3 100.125 4,491,345.00 1.63 233635AM9 FLTG AT 12/15/2002 DD 12/15/00 MR 4,505,625.00 1.14 711,519.03 DISTRIBUTION PINL 99-1 CL A6 .000 5.653 102.S90 726,417.28 .23 25675RAD6 5.860% 10/17/2011 US 03/19/99 729,948.19 .19 429,304.57 FHLMC GROUP IG6-03S3 .000 7.332 AM 102.291 660,171.33 .13 3128DSM2 7.5001 10/01/2004 DO 03/01/95 MA 439,139.94 .11 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL ED= IN OR CONE OUR .000 6.571 AM 108./39 7,997,625.00 2.50 3133MAUN7 7.1251 02/15/2005 DO 02/09/00 MS 0,132,950.00 2.05 YLDAML YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t I OCSP0I522202 2002/05/31 RUN GATE , 06/06/02 DISTRICT. SONG-TERM OPERATING RON TIME 11.00.17 PM VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY LAMEST TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE MARRY VALUE % TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 148,008.30 , FULIC GROUP II9-6064 .000 6.192 AAA 102.438 144,400.61 .04 313488NE3 6.3041 01/01/2020 DO 12/01/97 AM 151,616.14 .04 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL AM ASSN DEM .000 5.097 AAA 103.000 11,521,271.50 3.71 31359MJX2 5.2501 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AM 11,690,500.00 2.95 613,134.24 GUM II POOL 10000395 .000 5.450 ARE 100.922 607,5II.71 .19 36225CNM4 VAR AT 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 RAN 610,787.34 .16 5,244,623.54 GUM II POOL 4000400X .000 5.451 ARE 100.906 5,191,357.02 1.68 3622SCH28 6.5009 05/20/2030 DD 05/02/00 AAA 5,292,139.83 1.33 41000,000.00 GENERAL STAN ACCEP MTN 400615 .000 2.266 A2 99.312 3,990,440.00 1.26 37042MMOO PLUG RT 00/04/2003 W O9/03/01 BBB+ 3,972,400.00 I.00 4,000,000.90 NABISCO IM GTE .000 6.03I A2 101.460 4,001,440.00 1.28 629527GB VAR RT 02/01/2033 DO 01/22/98 A 4,058,400.00 1.02 5,000,000.00 PRILIP NOMIS C0N ISO HIS .000 I.030 A2 I06.086 5,263,000.00 1.60 710154CUS 2.5001 04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 A- 5,304,300.00 1.34 453,699.12 PREMIER AUTO IS 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.321 AAA 101.719 466,317.62 .14 74046M G 6.430% 03/O0/2004 DO 06/21/99 461,493.67 .12 4,029,964.01 SBA GTD CUP PARTS 2001-20C 1 .000 6.149 AM 103.1I0 4,029,964.01 1.32 03162CW0 4.3401 03/01/2021 AM 4,155,295.09 1.05 2,997,107.68 SM DID PARTS CITE SBIC-PS O1 .000 6.403 AAA 103.700 2,997,107.69 .98 831641DD4 6.6401 02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 NR 3,100,000.66 .70 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASBTMU 01-1 C .000 9.034 M3 75.615 1,600,000.00 .39 909317BC2 6.9311 09/01/2008 DO O6/22/01 A- 1,209,840.00 .30 6,213,285.00 OS TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY .000 3.650 AAA 106.156 6,295,670.72 2.09 9120274YS 3.0751 01/15/2009 DO O1/15/99 AAA 6,595,774.82 1.66 74,500,000.00 U 6 TREASURY NOTES .000 6.223 AAA 100.469 $0,879,062.50 25.67 9128276D9 06.750% 05/15/2005 DD 05/15/00 AAA 80,809,405.00 20.36 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PER 01 SER A .000 5.619 A3 102.333 3,403,690.00 1.13 927804EN0 5.750% 03/31/2006 DO 03/27/01 A- 3,581,655.00 .90 25,931,590.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.017 3.242 RAN 104.094 23,053,6II.57 8.50 91202I2N3 3.3751 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 AAA 27,014,049.09 6.81 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 MSM7522202 2002/05/31 RUN DAYS 06/06/02 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 11.00.17 PAR VALUE YIN AT CONSENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY YD SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE HARRET VALUE 9 TOTAL _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,600,000.00 . SEARS ROEBUCK ACCNP CORD NTH 5.261 6.373 BAAI 102.625 1,438,920.00 .65 0N 9126006 6.560% 02/20/2003 DD 02/20/97 A- 1,636,750.00 .36 3,950,000.00 GRAC HIS 5.752 2.036 A2 98.006 3,918,768.50 1.26 370625QV5 VAR RT 08/10/2003 DD 08/17/90 BBB+ 3,902,837.00 .98 3,000,000.00 BEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD M131 5.069 6.602 BAA. 100.421 3,073,170.00 .95 81240QSKI 6.630% 07/09/2002 DO 07/09/97 A- 3,012,530.00 .76 2,000,000.00 BARKERS TR BY COST GLOBAL HT 5.001 2.018 Al 99.839 1,992,800.00 .63 066365=4 PLTG AT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 A 1,996,780.00 .50 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL HATL NIG SEES =88 5.967 6.567 AAA 108.500 16,156,610.00 5.36 31359ST81 7.125% 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 16,017,500.00 6.26 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTE TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.997 SAY 100.050 7,497,255.00 2.38 079067US VAR AT 06/1S/2002 DO 06/15/98 A. 7,503,750.00 1.89 3,000,000.00 BALTIMORE GAS 6 ELBC CO 6.011 6.517 A2 1D2.015 3,030,250.00 .97 059165DN7 6.750% 12/1S/2002 DD 12/20/00 BBB+ 3,060,450.00 .77 1,500,000.00 CHRISLER FIRL LLC HIN 6TR00615 6.156 1.901 A3 99.937 1,499,415.00 .67 17120ORGO FLTG AT 08/08/2002 DD 04/00/98 BBB+ 1,499,055.00 .39 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEAD 6.271 2.060 Al 99.997 2,994,300.00 .95 209111CUS VAR HE 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 A+ 2,999,910.00 .76 3,900,000.00 GENERAL STAB ACCEP 6TR COS62 6.303 2.070 A2 99.531 3,793,959.00 1.20 37042MSKO FLTG AT 02/14/2003 OD 02/14/00 BBB+ 3,782,138.00 .95 1,860,650.SO PBLNC HULTICLRSS WIN HER E3 A 6.316 6.927 AAA 97.790 1,062,885.66 .57 3133=895 VAR AT 00/15/2032 DD 12/81/97 AAA 1,019,874.57 .66 1,477,300.91 ONNA GTD STMIC It 2000-9 PH 6.320 2.329 AAA 100.401 2,477,300.91 .67 3B37H6NK9 VAR AT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,68+,406.73 .37 2,000,000.00 NEAR STEWS COS IBC 6.330 6.S63 A2 102.653 2,031,960.00 .65 073902MI 6.7501 04/15/2003 A 2,057,060.00 .52 3,000,000.00 FORD SIR CA CO GLORN3. LANDNARK 6.350 2.197 A3 99.236 3,000,000.00 .96 365397SR5 PLED AT 03/17/2003 DD 03/16/00 BBB+ 2,977,020.00 .75 2,000,000.00 FORD HIR CA CO GLOBAL EYE 6.351 2.056 A3 99.312 1,992,500.00 .63 345397RW FLTO AT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/99 BBB+ 1,906,240.00 .50 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 9 WOM7522202 2002/05/31 RUN DATE 1 06/06/02 DISTRICTS LONG-TERN WRESTLES RUN TINE a 11.00.17 , PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY EAEEST TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION EGOS YIELD S-P PRICE NEARLY VALUE 1 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 21,077.74 .SURE POOL /0500917 6.399 6.028 AAA 99.531 20,007.39 .00 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 ARE 20,978.99 .01 65,338.06 GONE POOL J0506636 6.309 6.045 ARE 99.250 62,020.11 .02 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 ARE 64,848.02 .02 785,210.38 MEE POOL /0503380 6.389 6.028 ARE 99.531 745,344.01 .24 3621OWSS 6.0001 03/15/2029 DD 03/01/99 ARE 791,535.71 .20 25,871.23 GUNK POOL 00499153 6.309 6.028 ARA 99.531 24,557.44 .00 3621000NS 6.000% 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 ARE 25,749.29 .01 6,006.31 GONE POOL #0496284 6.390 6.021 AM 95.656 5,701.30 .00 3621OW51 6.000% 01/IS/2029 DD 02/01/99 AM 5,995.65 .00 805,062.90 GNSA POOL #0496461 6.390 6.021 MA 99.656 764,180.06 .25 36210NOE4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 SEA 902,293.56 .20 226,571.65 SURE POOL 10491103 6.390 6.021 An 99.656 215,066.06 .07 36210PRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 ARE 22S,792.24 .06 19,063.44 GNM POOL 00406720 6.390 6.045 ARE 99.250 10,054.75 .00 36210AVR6 6.000% 12/15/2029 DO 12/01/90 AM 19,714.46 .00 41,034.35 CNNA POOL /0497343 6.390 6.021 ARE 99.656 32,950.58 .01 36210OP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 AM 40,893.12 .01 39,925.67 GKKA POOL 1046968E 6.391 6.045 ERR 99.250 37,890.20 .01 362098=9 6.0001 11/15/2020 DD 11/01/99 AM 39,625.23 .01 49,241.24 GENE POOL 10457279 6.391 6.021 ARE 99.656 46,740.72 .01 362090007 6.000% 10/15/2029 DD 10/01/98 AM 49,071.85 .01 75,905.20 QNNA POOL #0457814 6.391 6.043 AAA 99.250 72,051.21 .02 36208QSB3 6.0001 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 AAA 75,336.51 .02 683,711.34 SEES POOL 10467206 6.391 6.021 AAA 99.656 648,991.64 .21 36209CCA2 6.0009 10/15/2029 DD 10/01/90 AAA 681,359.37 .17 823,849.3S SURE POOL /0465555 6.392 6.045 AM 99.2SO 782,013.26 .25 36209AE48 6.0001 09/15/2028 DD 09/01/90 ARE 917,670.40 .21 32,297.92 GUSH POOL #0483452 6.392 6.021 AM 99.656 30,640.2E .01 36209NEV3 6.000% 09/15/2020 DD 09/01/98 ARE 32,176.05 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 30 MSF07522202 2002/05/31 RUN DATE t 06/06/02 DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE t 11.00.17 PAR VALUE ITS AT CURRENT MOODY MONET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE XAMET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 937,878.93 GUM POOL #0465546 6.39E 6.045 AM 99.250 795,330.39 .26 36209MT3 6.000% OB/15/2028 DD 00/01/90 AAR 031,594.84 .21 784,171.40 GMA POOL 00460339 6.392 6.021 AM 99.656 744,350.21 .24 36209DBQO 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 00/01/90 AM 701,473.85 .20 41,140.11 GMA POOL /0438057 9.393 6.021 AAA 99.656 39,050.97 .02 36207PTN9 6.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 AM 40,998.59 .01 37,242.14 OHM POOL 00469330 6.393 6.045 AM 99.250 35,3SO.93 .01 36209DEP4 6.000% OS/15/2020 DO 05/01/96 AAA 36,962.82 .01 2,000,000.00 PELNC XULTICLNSS DIP III A6 6.496 6.246 AM 104.067 2,000,800.00 .66 3133TOPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AAA 2,081,340.00 .52 2,744,240.91 PNLNC NULTICLA48 DIP SER 1620E 6.499 6.366 AAA 94.251 2,588,100.97 .82 3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,586,474.50 .65 1,000,000.00 BALOSOX SB ELUDE NTN 6.625 2.176 M1 100.109 1,000,000.00 .31 79S48BER8 VAR RT 04/20/2003 DO 04/2B/00 M- 11001,090.00 .25 1,624,096.96 FSLNC GROUP #G5-0476 6.620 6.954 AAA 100.658 1,649,473.48 .51 3120DDQSS 1.0001 02/01/2003 DO 02101/90 MA 1,634,783.52 .41 079,604.17 GNNA II POOL #080000" 6.705 6.222 AAA 102.453 099,049.69 .28 36225CC20 7.375E 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AM 901,395.77 .23 2,000,000.00 MESH 6 NCLEMAN COS INC SR HT 6.117 6.272 A2 105.628 1,992,200.00 .67 571740AB8 6.6251 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 RE- 2,112,560.00 .53 3,000,000.00 FORD NIR CR CO CWBAL LMDXARN 6.739 6.484 A3 103.331 2,995,080.00 .98 345397SS3 6.700E 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 BBB. 3,099,930.00 .78 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYSIDE ROVE ME INC XT 6.066 6.495 A3 105.465 2,498,400.00 .83 22237UAB8 6.9501 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,636,625.00 .66 534,445.00 OEM. II POOL #0000023 6.992 6.422 AM 103.156 543,296.76 .17 36225CM9 VM RT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AM 551,312.08 .24 7,000,000.00 OLD SENT BN NTN BE 00001 7.084 2.667 M3 99.82E 7,000,000.00 2.22 67902EAA6 VM RT 11/01/2005 DO 04/2S/00 A. 6,907,960.00 1.76 2,100,000.00 PEDERAL NATL NINI ASSN DENS 7.123 6.138 AM 107.930 2,030,133.00 .72 31359MYS 6.625% 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AM 2,266,690.00 .57 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11 OC6P07522202 2002/05/31 RUN DAM 06/06/02 DISTRICTS LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME f 11.00.13 PAR VALUE ITS AT CONSENT MOODY HARKEY TOTAL COST/ 9 TYPE SECURITY IS SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE A TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,000,000.00 LGEG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 3.512 7.092 BAA3 103.905 2,151,250.00 .66 542671CT3 0.2001 03/15/2023 GO 03/20/93 A- 2,078,100.00 .52 800,055.79 ORBYSTONE SVCRO CORP MA 195-7 3.564 0.395 AAA 100.469 796,250.59 .25 398101A84 3.430% 06/01/2003 DD 02/29/00 AAA 811,843.55 .20 1,000,000.00 FORD ROTOR CR CO NT 3.582 6.556 A3 102.965 965,170.00 .32 345393GV9 6.3509 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93 BBBF 1,029,650.00 .26 959,663.17 NMP/RUNTOON PAIGE 1000-11150 3.684 3.559 AAA 99.229 936,920.49 .3D 302998GE3 3.5001 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 952,165.80 .24 3,000,000.00 PACIPICORP SECD SYS 1TR 00115 7.709 6.040 A2 106.719 2,950,530.00 1.01 69512EEU5 3.3001 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 A 3,201,540.00 .01 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORD BE NT 3.967 3.164 Al 109.920 1,594,032.00 .55 020002AL5 7.075% 05/01/2005 DO 05/01/00 A4 1,750,849.00 .44 ___ _______ -------------- _________ TOTAL PIKED INCONE SECURITIES 1.4]3 5.495 309,184,588.98 200.00 314,718,593.94 39.30 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 1.458 5.457 390,391,240.11 100.00 396,925,245.07 100.00 Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. / PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 76,405.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-May-2002 -76,405.75 996085247 01-May-2002 76.405.75 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 76,405.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-May-2002 -76,405.75 996085247 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 01-May-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 45,167.50 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-May-2002 45,167.50 996087094 01-May-2002 45,167.50 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 470,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 01-May-2002 468,560.62 313397YW5 MAT07/032002 01-May-2002 468,560.62 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 470,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 01-May-2002 468,560.62 313397YWS MAT 07/032002 01-May-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 01-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 145,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 01-May-2002 -144,492.50 313313ZD3 MAT 07/102002 01-May-2002 144,492.50 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 IIJun-2002 9:36:13 &eculiw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE: 2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SFIARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 145,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 01-May-2002 -144,492.50 3133132D3 MAT 07/102002 01-May-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 01-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,167.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-May-2002 45,167.50 996095247 02-May-2002 45,167.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,167.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-May-2002 -45,167.50 996085247 02-May-2002 0.00 FC 02-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 07-May-2002 -399,812.50 86387THK7 VAR RT 06202002 DD 12201 08-May-2002 399,812.50 B DAM RAUSCHER ING MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 07-May4002 -2,734.54 86387THK7 VAR RT 06202002 DD 1220/ 08-May-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 07-May-2002 402,547A4 86387THK7 VAR RT 06202002 DD 1220/ 08-May-2002 0.00 FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 08-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN SHORT T 07-May-2002 -499,765.63 86387THL5 VAR RT 07/182002DD01/17/ 08-May-2002 499,765.63 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 11-A.-20U 9:36.13 EseeulfwWorkb,ah- Qi Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSDCONSOWDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE CADULOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 501000.00 STUDENT IN MKTG ASSN SHORT T 07-May-2002 -2,773.30 86387THL5 VAR RT 07/182002 DD 01/17/ 09-May-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 STUDENT IN MKTG ASSN SHORT T 07-May-2002 -502,538.93 86387rHL5 VAR RT 07/182002DD01/17/ 08-May-2002 0.00 FC DAIN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0&May-2002 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 71,543.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-May-2002 -71,543.42 996095247 08-May-2002 71,543.42 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 71,543.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 08-May-2002 -71.543.42 996085247 08-May-2002 0.00 FC 08-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,822,000.00 PITNEY BOWES INC DISC 08-May-2002 -1,919,534.23 7244TFF50 06/052002 08-May-2002 1,819,534.23 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,822,000.00 PITNEY BOWES INC DISC 08-May-2002 -1,819,534.23 72447TFSO 06/052002 08-May-2002 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 08-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,525.23 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MON T 10-May-2002 49,525.23 996085247 10-May-2002 48,525.23 B 0.00 11-Jun-2002 9,36,13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS600010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 48,525.23 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-May-2002 -48,525.23 996085247 10-May-2002 0.00 FC 10-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,545.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-May-2002 -20,545.00 9%085247 10-May-2002 20,545.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,545.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-May-2002 -20,545.00 996085247 10-May-2002 0.00 FC 10-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,111.11 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 13-May-2002 -10,111.11 996087094 13-May-2002 10,111.11 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,000,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 13-May-2002 -25,000,000.00 99392HO50 01.740%05/14/2002 DO 05/13/ 13-May-2002 25,000,000.00 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,000,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 13-May-2002 -25,000,000.00 99392HO50 01.740%0 5/1 412 0 02 DO 05/13/ 13-May-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 13-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 13-May-2002 -26,700,000.00 9939211241 01.750-A 05/14/2002 DO 05/13/ 13-May-2002 26,700,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 I1Jun•1001 9:36.13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE: 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 13-May-2002 -26,700,000.00 99392H241 01.750%05/14/2002 DD 05/13/ 13-May-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 13-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51,712,617.36 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-May-2002 -51,712,617.36 996085247 14-May-2002 51,712,617.36 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51,712,617.36 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-May-2002 -51,712,617.36 996095247 14-May-2002 0.00 FC 14-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,243.58 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 14-May-2002 -19,243.58 996087094 14-May-2002 19,243.58 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,262,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 14-May-2002 -1,256,603.55 313397 126 MAT 08/08/2002 14-May-2002 1,256,603.55 B WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,262,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 14-May-2002 -1,256,603.55 313397B26 MAT 08/09/2002 14-May-2002 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 14-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 940,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NT 14-May-2002 -838,265.40 313397YN5 MAT 06/25/2002 14-May-2002 838,265.40 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 llJun-2002 9:36.13 Eieeariw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 840,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NT 14-May-2002 -839,265.40 313397YNS MAT 06/25/2002 14-May-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 14-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 14-May-2002 -299,542.75 313313YB8 MAT 06/14/2002 14-May-2002 299,542.75 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 14-May-2002 -299,542.75 313313YBS MAT06/142002 14-May-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 14-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,434,912.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-May-2002 -1,434,912.50 996085247 15-May-2002 1,434,912.50 g 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,434,912.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-May-2002 -1,434,912.50 996085247 15-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,016,446.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-May-2002 -3,016,446.63 9%085247 15-May-2002 3,016,446.63 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,016,446.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-May-2002 -3,016,446.63 9%085247 15-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 114un-1002 9:36.13 E¢culiw Wtwkbeneh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: •7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 167,345.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-May-2002 -167,345.31 996085247 16-May-2002 167,345.31 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 167,345.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-May-2002 -167,345.31 996085247 16-May-2002 0.00 FC 16-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 102,313.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-May-2002 -IOZ313.33 996095247 16-May-2002 102,313.33 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 102,313.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-May-2002 -102,313.33 996085247 16-May-2002 0.00 FC 16-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 16-May-2002 -1,498,386.67 26354BF72 06/072002 16-May-2002 1,498,386.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 16-May-2002 -1,499,386.67 26354BF72 0&072002 16-May-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY I&May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-May-2002 -399,300.00 313385YJ9 MAT 06/212002 16-May-2002 399,300.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 11Jun-2002 9:36.13 Execullw Wmkbencb Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-May-2002 -399,300.00 313385YI9 MAT 0621/2002 16-May-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 16-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 441,576.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-May-2002 441,576.64 996085247 20-May-2002 441,576.64 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 441,576.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-May-2002 -441,576.64 996085247 20-May-2002 0.00 FC 20-Mey-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,836.90 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCF 20-May-2002 -19,836.90 996097094 20-May-2002 19,836.90 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 198,102.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-May-2002 -188,102.53 996085247 21-May-2002 188,102.53 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 198,102.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-May-2002 -188,102.53 996085247 21-Mey-2002 0.00 PC 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 340,410.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-May-2002 -340,410.08 996085247 21-May-2002 340,410.08 B 0.00 I1-Jun-2002 9:36.13 Execatire orkbench QMellon Trust-Sample Re-port PAGE.' 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 340,410.08 - DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-May-2002 -340,410.08 996085247 21-May-2002 0.00 FC 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 21-May-2002 -299,168.75 313589ZLO MAT 07/172002 21-May-2002 299,168.75 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO MG NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 21-May-2002 -299,16&75 313589ZLO MAT 07/17/2002 21-May-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 360,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 21-May-2002 -359,107.50 313397ZE4 MAT 07/112002 21-May-2002 359,107.50 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 360,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 21-May-2002 -359,107.50 313397ZE4 MAT 07/112002 21-May-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,639,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 21-May-2002 -3,625,555.91 313589A78 MAT 08t05/2002 21-May-2002 3,625,555.91 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,639,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 21-May-2002 -3,625,555.91 313589A78 MAT 08/052002 21-May-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 21-May-2002 0.00 11Jan-2002 9:36.13 Execattve Wwkbe h Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS600010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 755,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE.CONS DISC 21-May-2002 -752,908.02 313385ZL3 MAT 07/172002 21-May-2002 752,909.02 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 755,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 21-May-2002 -75Z908.02 313385ZL3 MAT 07/172002 21-May-2002 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 21-May-2002 -199,35833 313397ZV6 MAT 07262002 21-May-2002 199,3$8.33 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 21-May-2002 -199,358.33 313397ZV6 MAT 072612002 21-Mey-2002 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NI S 23-May-2002 -2,194,390.53 313313Z10 MAT07/152002 23-May-2002 Z194,380.53 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 23-May-2002 -2,194.390.53 313313Z10 MAT07/l52002 23-May-2002 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 23-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 24-May-2002 -699,294.53 63743DGC9 07/122002 24-May-2002 698,294.53 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 0.00 11Jum2002 9.36:13 Executive Warkbnxh' Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE. PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 - NATIONAL RURAL DISC 24-May-2002 -698,294.53 63743DGC9 07/12/2002 24-May-2002 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 24-May-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 13,938.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-May-2002 -I3,938.46 996095247 28-Mey-2002 13,938.46 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,938.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-May-2002 -13,938.46 996085247 28-May-2002 0.00 FC 28-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,080.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-May-2002 -3,080.00 996085247 29-May-2002 3,080.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,080.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-May-2002 -3,080.00 996085247 29-May-2002 0.00 FC 29-May-2002 0,00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 29-May-2002 -1,496,920.00 02581SGA3 07/10/2002 29-May-2002 1,496,920.00 B BANKERS TRUST CP/IPA,NEW YO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 29-May-2002 -I,496,920.00 02581SGA3 07/10/2002 29-May-2002 0.00 FC BANKERS TRUST CPAPA,NEW YO 29-May-2002 0.00 1 Nun-2001 9..36:13 Eiecutive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE: 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE DROVER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-May-2002 .11.85 996085247 30-May-2002 11.85 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11.85 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-May-2002 .11.85 996085247 30-May-2002 0.00 PC 30-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,352.20 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 31-May-2002 -13,352.20 996087094 31-May-2002 13,352.20 B 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA SF MTG 19-Mar-2002 -5,958,750.00 0IF060451 6.0001K 05/01/2017 DD 05101/ 16-May-2002 0.00 PC RK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 16-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 08-Apr-2002 -9,765,625.00 0IF060659 6.000%05/012032 DO 05/01/ 13-May-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 13-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBO 10-Apr-2002 -1,246,500.00 21HO72650 7.500%05202032 DO 051011 21-May-2002 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG II-Apr-2002 -3,513,125.00 OIN062656 6.5001/o 05/152032 DD 05/01/ 21-May-2002 0.00 PC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-May-2002 0.00 114un-2002 9:36.13 Eieeultw Workbench " QMellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURGNMASFMTG I3-Apr-2002 -14,783,125.00 OIN080658 8.000%05/152032 DO 051011 21-May-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 15-APT-2002 -7,052,500.00 OIN062636 6.500%05/152032 DO 051011 21-May-2002 0.00 PC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 02-May-2002 -6,050,625.00 0IF060469 6,000%06/012017 DO 06/01/ 18-Jun-2002 6,050,625.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 06-May-2002 -9,956,250.00 0IF060667 6.000%06/012032 DO 06101/ 13-Jun-2002 9,856,250.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 13-May-2002 -1,251,000.00 21 H072669 7.500%06202032 DO O6/01/ 20-Jun-2002 1,251,000.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 16-May-2002 •14,848,750.00 OIN080666 8.000%06/152032 DO 06/01/ 20-Jun-2002 14,848,750.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 17-May-2002 -7,061,250.00 OIN062664 6.5000/.06/152032 DO 06/01/ 20-Jun-2002 7,061,250.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 HJun-1001 9.36:13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.DD COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 17-May-2002 -3,531,718.75 OIN062664 6.500%06/152032 DO 0&01/ 20-Jun-2002 3,531,718.75 B SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 22-May-2002 -1,013,050.00 3133M82G8 5.840%09252002 DO 0925/ 23-May-2002 1,013,050.00 B MORGAN KEEGAN&CO INC 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 22-May-2002 -9,408.89 3133M82G8 5.940%09252002 DO 09251 23-May-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 22-May-2002 -1,022,458.89 3133M82G8 5.840%0925/2002 DO 09/251 23-May-2002 0.00 PC MORGAN KEEGAN&CO INC 23-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 29-May-2002 -3,043,476.55 0IF06D469 6.000%06/012017 DO 06/011 18-Jun-2002 3,043,476.55 0 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 29-May-2002 -6,086,250.00 0IF060469 6.000%06/012017 DD 06/011 19-Jun-2002 6,086,250.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1144n1002 9:36:13 Eymulew Bbrtbemh •' QMellon Trust-Sample Re ort PAGE' 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE! AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 143,750.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15.Jan-2002 -143,750.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 01/15/ 15-1en-2002 143,750.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 143,750.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 15-Jan-2002 -143,750.00 9128272M3 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 011151 15-Jen-2002 0.00 PC 31-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,485.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX I54an4002 -34,485.00 9128274Y5 3.875%01/15/2009 DD 01115/ 154an-2002 34,485.00 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,485.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX I54an-2002 -34,495.00 9128274Y5 3.875%01/15/2009 DO 011151 15-Jan-2002 0.00 PC 31-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,652.92 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-May-2002 -13,652.92 3133T17A4 6.000%I1/15/2023 DD 11/0119 01-May-2002 13,652.92 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,652.92 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-May-2002 -13,65192 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 1110119 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 23-May-2002 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 11-Jun-2002 9.36.13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL oCSG000l0000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 46,325.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-May-2002 46,325.60 996085247 01-May-2002 46,325.60 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 46,325.60 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-May-2002 46,325.60 996085247 01-May-2002 0.00 PC 01-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 45,167.50 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 02-May-2002 45,167.50 996087094 02-May-2002 45,167.50 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,024,620.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-May-2002 1,024,620.20 996085247 08-May-2002 -1,024,620.20 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,024,620.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-May-2002 1,024,620.20 996085247 08-May-2002 0.00 PC 0&May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,939.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-May-2002 5,939.96 996085247 09-May-2002 -5,939.96 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,939.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-May-2002 5,939.96 996085247 09-May-2002 0.00 FC 09-May-2002 0.00 11./un-TOOT 9:36.13 Emculm Wmkbewh QMellon Trust-Sam le Report PAGE- 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51,562,290.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-May-2002 51,562,290.20 996085247 13-May-2002 -51,562,290.20 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51,562,290.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-May-2002 51,562.290,20 996085247 13-May-2002 0.00 FC 13-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,111.11 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCf 14-May-2002 10.111.11 996097094 14-May-2002 -10,111.11 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -394,411.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-May-2002 394,411.70 996085247 14-May-2002 -394.411.70 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -394.411.70 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-May-2002 394.411.70 _996085247 14-May-2002 0.00 PC 14-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,000,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 14-May-2002 25,000,000.00 99392HO50 01.740%05/142002 DO 05/13/ 14-May-2002 -25,000,000.00 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,000,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 14-May-2002 1,208.33 99392HO50 01.740%05/142002 DO 05/13/ 14-May-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 1/Jun-2002 9:36.13 F.. w1w 1Forkk h Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE. 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,000,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 14-May-2002 25,001,208.33 99392HO50 01.740%05/14/2002 DD 05/13/ 14-May-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 14-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-May-2002 26,700,000.00 99392H241 01.750%05/142002 DD 05/13/ 14-May-2002 -26,700,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-May-2002 1,297.92 99392H241 01.750%05/142002 DO 05/13/ 14-May-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 14-May-2002 26,701,297.92 99392H241 01.750%05/142002 DO 051131 14-May-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 14-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,243.59 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 15-May-2002 19,243.58 996097094 15-May-2002 -19,243.58 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,936.90 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 21-May-2002 19,836.90 996087094 21-May-2002 -19,836.90 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,116,839.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-May-2002 1,116,839.42 996085247 23-May-2002 -1,116,839.42 S 0.00 11Jun-2002 9.36.13 Executive Bbrftenc6•. Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL 00GOW10090 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLlDA7ED SHARESD'AR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY m TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,116,839.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-May-2002 1,116,839.42 996085247 23-May-2002 O.OD FC 23-May-2002 0.00 _ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -70,294.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-May-2002 70,294.53 996083247 24-May-2002 -70,294.53 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -70,294.53 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-May-2002 70,294.53 996085247 24-May-2002 0.00 FC 24-May-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000,00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 02-May-2002 6,073,593.75 01 F060451 6.000%05/012017 DO 051011 16-May-2002 -51958,750.00 S BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS Cr 114,843.75 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 02-May-2002 6,073,593.75 0IF060451 6.000%05/012017 DD 051011 16-May-2002 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 16-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1 O,OOD,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 06-May-2002 9,993,359.38 0IF060659 6.00D%05MI2032 DD 051011 13-May-2002 -9,765,625.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 127,734.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,00D.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 06-May-2002 9,993,359.38 0IF06D659 6.000%05/012032 DD 051011 13-May-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 13-May-2002 0.00 1IJun-2002 9.36.13 Fiecudw Wmkbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBO 13-May-2002 1,253,437.50 21HO72650 7.500%0520/2032 DO 051011 21-May-2002 .1,246,500.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 6,937.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 11 JUMBO 13-May-2002 1,253,437.50 21HO72650 7.500%05202032 DD 05MIl 21-May-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 164312002 14,979,375.00 OIN080659 9.000%05/152032 DD 05/01/ 21-May-2002 -14,793,125.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 96,250.00 LONG TERM OPER-PJMCO -14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 16-May-2002 14,879,375.00 OIN080658 8.000Y.05/152032 DO 051011 21-May-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 17-May-2002 3,544,296.88 OIN062656 6.50D%05/15/2032 DO 051011 21-May-2002 -3,521,875.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 22,421.98 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,DDO.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA SF MTG 17-May-2002 3,544,296.88 OIN062656 6.500%05/15=2 DO 051011 21-May-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 17.May-2002 7,086,406.25 OIN062656 6.500%05/152032 DD 05/01/ 21-May-2002 -7,043,750.00 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 42,656.25 Jl,%w2002 936:13 ExecutiveObrkbench- QMellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE, 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 17-May-2002 7,086,406.25 OIM62656 6.500%05/15/2032 DO 051011 21-May-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 21-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 COMMITTO PUR GNMA SF MTG 29-May-2002 14,868,437.50 OIN090666 8.000%06/15/2032 DO 06101/ 20-Jun-2002 -14,849,750.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19,687.50 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,869.25 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 01-Apr-2002 6,869.25 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/011 01-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,232.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Apr-2002 -41,232.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT O8/152032 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2002 41,277.09 PDC 45.09 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -969.64 GNMA POOLA0491103 01-May-2002 969.64 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029DD01/0l/ 01-May-2002 -920.40 PD 49.24 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -969.64 GNMA POOL80491103 01-May-2002 969.64 36210FRY4 6.000°h01/152029DD01/0l/ 01-May-2002 0.00 PC 15-May-2002 0.00 11Jun-1001 9.36.13 Execulm Wmkbeuch Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39.67 GNMA POOLN0483452 01-May-2002 39.67 36209WBV3 6.0001%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-May-2002 -37.66 PD 2.01 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39.67 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-May-2002 39.67 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-Mey-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34.01 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-May-2002 34.01 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-May-2002 .32.28 PD 1.73 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34.01 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-May-2002 34.01 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 12/011 01-Ma3-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32.58 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Mey-2002 32.58 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-May-2002 -30.93 PD 1.65 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32.58 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-May-2002 32.58 36210SPA0 6.000%04/152029 DD 04/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32.15 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-May-2002 32.15 3621000E5 6.000%02/1520290D02101/ 01-May-2002 -30.52 PD 1.63 IIJvn-2002 9.36:13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE OAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32.15 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-May-2002 32.15 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DO 021011 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -61.99 GNMA POOLN0497343 01-May-2002 61.89 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-May-2002 -58.75 PD 3.14 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -61.89 GNMA POOLH0497343 01-May-2002 61.89 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -11,127.65 GNMA POOLR0496461 01-May-2002 11,127.65 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-May-2002 -10,562.57 PD 565.08 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,127.65 GNMA POOLW0496461 01-May-2002 11,127.65 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/0l/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7.16 GNMA POOLN0496284 01-May-2002 7.16 36210MI51 6.0000/01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-May-2002 -6.80 PD 0.36 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7.16 GNMA POOLN0496284 01-May-2002 7.16 36210MI51 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 11.1un-2002 9.36.13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,169.77 GNMA POOLN0506636 01-May-2002 1,169.77 36210YY90 6.000%04/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-May-2002 -1,110.37 PD 59.40 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,169.77 GNMA POOL90506636 01-May-2002 1,169.77 36210YY90 6.0001.04/15/2029 DO 04/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 PC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -51.08 GNMA POOLN0438057 01-May-2002 51.08 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-May-2002 49.49 PD 2.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .51.08 GNMA POOL#0438057 DI-May-2002 51.08 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028 DO 051011 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -203,999.40 FHLMC GROUP NG5.0476 01-May-2002 203,999.40 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/011 01-May-2002 -207,196.99 PD -3,197.49 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -203,999.40 FHLMC GROUP NGS-0476 01-May-2002 203,999.40 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 PC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,053.84 FHLMC GROUP NG4-0353 01-May-2002 17,053.94 3128DBMA2 7,500%10/012004 DO 03/01/ 01-May-2002 -17,485.52 PD 431.68 11Jun2002 9:36:13 Esttattve Wo kbemh' QMellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCS&CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,053.84 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-May-2002 17,053.94 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DO 03/011 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,352.39 ONMA POOL#0465555 01-May-2002 1,352.39 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 091011 01-May-2002 -1,283.71 PD 68.69 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,352.39 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-May-2002 1,352.39 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -1,363.75 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-May-2002 1,363.75 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028DD08/01/ 01-May-2002 -1,294.50 PD 69.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.363.75 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-May-2002 1,363.75 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -115.86 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-May-2002 115.86 36208QS83 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/011 01-May-2002 -109.98 PD 5.88 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -115.96 GNMA POOL40457814 01-May-2002 115.86 36208QSB3 6.000°/10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 11Jan-2001 9:36.13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Rep2rt PAGE. 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.39 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-May-2002 450.39 36209EXRS 6.000%11/15/2028 DO I I/01/ 01-May4002 427.52 PD 22.87 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.39 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-May-2002 450.39 36209EXR8 6.000%11/15/2028 DD 11/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,051.71 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-May-2002 1,051.71 36209DHQO 6.000%09/152028 DO 08101/ 01-May-2002 -998.30 PD 53.41 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,051.71 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-May-2002 1,051.71 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC I5-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -61.50 GNMA POOL#0469330 01-May-2002 61.50 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DO 051011 01-May-2002 .58.39 PD 112 LONGTERM OPER-P1MCO -61.50 GNMA POOL#0468330 01-May-2002 61.50 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DD 05/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100.95 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-May-2002 2,100.95 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-May-2002 -1,994.26 PD 106.69 11Jam1001 9.36:13 F.,c.ive wkbexh-' QMellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TEEM OPER-PIMCO -2,100.95 GNMA POOL40467279 01-May-2002 2,100.95 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028DD 10/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,500.69 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-May-2002 32,500.69 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/ 01-May-2002 -32,206.15 PD 294.54 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32,500.69 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-May-2002 32,500.69 36225CNM4 VAR RT 0 4/2 02 03 0DD04/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 20-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,662.41 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-May-2002 41,662.41 36225CC20 7.375%0620/2027 DO 06/01/ 01-May-2002 -42,573.79 PD -911.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,662.41 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-May-2002 41,662.41 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DO 06/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 20-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,647.28 GNMA PGOL#0503388 01-May-2002 33,647.28 36210VF55 6.0000/o03/152029DD03/01/ 01-May-2002 -31,938.63 PD 1,708.65 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -33,647.28 GNMA POOL#0503388 01-May-2002 33,647.28 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DD 031011 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 l/Jun-2001 9.36.13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 28 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -903.19 GNMA POOL80467286 01-May-2002 903.19 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028DD10/01/ 01-May-2002 -857.32 PD 45.87 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -903.19 GNMA POOL80467286 01-May-2002 903.19 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -36,044.69 GNMA I1 POOL#0080023 01-May-2002 36,044.69 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 12/0119 01-May-2002 -36.641.68 PD -5%.99 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -36,044.69 GNMA 11 POOL N0030023 01-May-2002 36,044.69 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 1=1/9 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 20-May-20D2 O.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -290,211.83 GNMA 11 POOL d080408X 01-May-2002 290,211.93 36225CN28 6.500°h 05202030 DD 051011 01-May-2002 -297,264.37 PD 2,947.46 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -290,211.93 GNMA 11 POOL#080408X 01-May-2002 290,211.93 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 051011 01-Map2002 0.00 FC 20-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,619.50 FHLMC GROUP 078-6064 01-May-2002 3,619.50 3134SSWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-May-2002 -3,531.28 PD 88.22 /1./aa-2002 9:36.13 Execuf,.B'brkberxh' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,284.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-May-2002 44,284.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/ 01-May-2002 44,332.93 PD .48.43 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -642.85 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01-May-2002 642.85 39810#AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 02/29/0 01-May-2002 -633.46 PD 9.39 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -642.85 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 01-May-2002 642.85 398104AE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 02129/0 01-May-2002 0.00 PC 28-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,343.81 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-May-2002 1,343.81 302998GE3 7.500%12/01/2030 DO 10/2119 01-May-2002 -1,314.62 PD 29.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,343.81 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-May-2002 1,343.91 302998GE3 7.5000/ 12/012030 DO 102119 01-May-2002 0.00 FC 31-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,360.92 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-May-2002 40,360.92 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DO 062U9 08-May-2002 41,483.46 PD A,122.54 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -40,360.92 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A4 08-May-2002 40,360.92 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DO 0621/9 08-May-2002 0.00 PC 09-May-2002 0.00 /IJuro2002 9:36:13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG0o010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -65,193.89 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-I CL A4 15-May-2002 65,193.89 25475MAD6 5.940%10/15/2011 DO 03/18/9 15-May-2002 -66,558.89 PD -1,365.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -65,193.89 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-May-2002 65,193.89 25475MAD6 5.840% 10/15/2011 DO 03/19/9 15-May-2002 0.00 PC 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -49,498.85 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-May-2002 49,498.85 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-May-2002 -09,498.85 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -49,493.85 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-May-2002 49,498.85 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 16-May-2002 0.00 PC 16-May-2002 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 01-May-2002 498,913.06 313385WF9 MAT 05/01/2002 01-May-2002 498,913.06 MT 01-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 MERCK&INC DISC 08-May-2002 1,695,835.00 58933SE87 05/09/2002 08-May-2002 -1,695.835.00 MT 08-May-2002 0.00 11Jun-2002 9:36..13 Fsecuttve Warkbeach- Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 14-May-2002 1,994,600.00 313397WUI MAT 05/142002 14-May-2002 -1,994,600.00 MT 14-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 16-May-2002 498,200.00 313385WW2 MAT 05/162002 16-May-2002 499,200.00 MT 16-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO -1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 16-May-2002 1,499,541.67 5007MIE04 05/162002 16-May-2002 -1,498,541.67 MT 16-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,033,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NT 21-May-2002 2,028,019.15 313397XB2 MAT 05212002 21-May-2002 -2,028,019.15 MT 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 23-May-2002 2,094,674.75 313589XDO MAT 05232002 23-May-2002 -2,094,674.75 MT 23-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -628,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 24-May-2002 625,488.00 19121EEQ2 05242002 24-May-2002 -625,488.00 MT 24-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 29-May-2002 1,497,520.83 02581 SEV9 05292002 29-May-2002 -1,497,520.83 MT 29-May-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 11-✓un-2002 9:36:13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 0CSD-00NS0LlDA7'ED SHARES/PAR TRADEDATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTLDATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -60,000.00 CHASE MANHATTAN CORP NEW SUB 01-May-2002 60,000.00 16161ABE7 8.62$%05/01/2002 DD 05/01/9 01-May-2002 -61,645.80 MT 01-May-2002 -1,645.80 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .20,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 10-May4002 20,000.00 3133MBRB2 5.450%05/10/2002 DO 05/1019 10-May-2002 .20,302.40 MT 10-May-2002 -302.40 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 15-May-2002 200,000.00 3134A3RE8 5.500%05/15/2002 DO 05/14/9 15-May-2002 -201,814.00 MT 15-May-2002 -1,814.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1.180,000.00 WELLS FARGO&CO SUB NT 15-May-2002 1,180,000.00 949740BV5 8.375%05/152002 DO 05/26/9 15-May-2002 -1,224,286.70 MT 15-May-2002 44,286.M LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -30,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 21-May-2002 30,000.00 3133M8VT8 5.660%0521/2002 DD 0521/ 21-May-2002 -30,409.90 MT 21-May-2002 409.90 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MTN 21-Mey-2002 3,400,000.00 31364CN79 6.390%05212002 DO 0521/9 21-May-2002 -3,438,379.00 MT 21-May-2002 -59,378.00 INTEREST lklua2002 9.36:13 Erecul/va Wbrkbemh' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGL 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 01-May-2002 27.75 996087094 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 01-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 014Aay-2002 63,000.00 020002AL5 7.975%05101/2005 DO 0510110 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 01-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-May-2002 13,378.00 996085247 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 01-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 60,000.00 CHASE MANHATTAN CORP NEW SUB 01-May-2002 2,587.50 1616IABE7 9.625%05/01/2DU DO 05/01/9 01-May4002 0.00 IT 01-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MTN SB 00001 01-May-2002 45,167.50 67982XAA6 VAR RT 11/01/2005 DO 0428/0 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 01-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 01-May-2002 4,140.02 996085247 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 01-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 01-May-2002 1,086.94 313385WF9 MAT 05/012002 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 01-May-2002 0.00 11Jun-2002 9:36:13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Report PACE: 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN 80061 07-May-2002 22,595.20 37042WESO FLTG RT 08/04/2003 DD 081031 05-May-2002 0.00 IT 07-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 MERCK&INC DISC 08-May-2002 4,165.00 58933SE87 05/08/2002 08-May-2002 0.00 IT 08-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,360.92 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 09-May-2002 2,647.34 74046RFW6 6.430%03/08/2004 DO 06/20 08-May-2002 0.00 IT 09-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 10-May-2002 48,525.23 831641DD4 6.64091.02/10/2011 DD02/21/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 10-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 10-May-2002 545.00 3133MSRB2 5.4501%05/10/2002 DD 05/10N 10-May-2002 0.00 IT 10-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 13-May-2002 9,975.42 345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/13/2003 DD 02/13/ 13-May-2002 0.00 IT 13-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 13-May-2002 10,111.11 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05111/ II-May-2002 0.00 IT 13-May-2002 0.00 I1Jun-2002 9.36:13 E*ecwNefiLrkbe=h- Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 14-May-2002 5,400.00 313397WUI MAT 05/14/2002 14-May-2002 0.00 IT 14-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 15-May-2002 5,500.00 3134A3RE8 5.500%05/15/2002 DO 05/14/9 15-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,180,000.00 WELLS FARGO&CO SUB NT 15-May-2002 49,412.50 949740BV5 8.375%05/152002 DD 052619 15-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 15-May-2002 33,750.00 345397GV9 6.750%05/152005 DO 0524/9 15-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MN 15-May-2002 45,780.00 81240QGW6 6.540%02202003 DD 02/20/9 15-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 74,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-May-2002 2,514,375.00 9128276D9 06.750%05/152005 DD 051151 15-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34.01 GNMA POOL ND486720 15-May-2002 99.49 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/011 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 11-Jun-2002 9.36:13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 969.64 GNMA POOL80491103 15-May-2002 1,137.71 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7.16 GNMA POOL#0496284 15-May-2002 30.07 36210MM 6.000%01/152029 DO 021011 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,127.65 GNMA POOL804%461 15-May-2002 4,080.95 36210MQN4 6.0001/01/1520291)DOI/011 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 61.89 GNMA POOL80497343 15-May-2002 205.49 36210NP45 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/011 01-May-20O2 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32.15 GNMA POOL 80499153 15-May-2002 129.52 3621000E5 6.000%02/15/2029DD02/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32.58 GNMA POOL 80500917 15-May-2002 105.55 36210SPAO 6.000-/04/152029 DO 04/011 01-May-2002 OM IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,647.28 GNMA POOL 80503388 15-May-2002 4,094.33 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029DD03/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 I IJun-1001 9:36.13 &ecur/ve Workbench' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,053.84 FHLMC GROUP#04.0353 15-May-2002 2,789.74 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 03/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 203,999.40 FHLMC GROUP BG5-0476 15-May-2002 10,663.90 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO 1,169.77 GNMA POOLN0506636 15-May-2002 332.54 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 51.08 GNMA POOL#0438057 15-May-2002 205.96 36207PTN9 6.0000/.05/152028 DO 051011 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6.969.25 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 15-May-2002 838.59 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-AP1-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 115.86 GNMA POOL®0457814 15-May-2002 380.11 36208QSB3 6.000%10/152028DD10/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,363.75 GNMA POOLW0465546 15-May-2002 4,196.21 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028 DO 08/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 IIJum2001 9.36.13 ExeculN Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,352.39 GNMA POOL#0465555 15-May-2002 4,126.01 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 09/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100.95 GNMA POOL#0467279 15-May-2002 256.71 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2029 DO 10/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 903.19 GNMA POOL#0467286 15-May-2002 3,423.07 36209CCX2 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 61.50 GNMA POOL#0468330 15-May-2002 186.52 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 051011 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,051.71 GNMA POOL#0468339 15-May-2002 3,926.12 36209DHQO 6.000°/a08/152028 DO 08/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 450.39 GNMA POOL#0469688 15-May-2002 201.88 36209EXR8 6.000%1 1/1 512 0 2 9 DO 11/011 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 15-May-2002 7,915.62 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr.2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 11Jun-1001 9:36..13 Executive M5,0 ncF- Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000l0000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 00D-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39.67 GNMA POOL 0483452 15-May-2002 161.64 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 65,193.89 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-May-2002 3,780.01 25475MAD6 5.84OV 10/15/2011 DO 03/1819 15-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,900,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP 8TR 00562 15-May-2002 19,243.59 37042 WZKO FLTG RT 02/14/2003 DO 021141 15-May-2002 0.00 IT 15-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 49,498.85 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 16-May-2002 3,002.71 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/1612030 16-May-2002 0.00 IT 16-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 16-Ma3-2002 1,800.00 313385WW2 MAT 05/16/2002 16-May-2002 0.00 1T 16-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 16-May-2002 1,458.33 5007MIEG4 05/16/2002 16-May-2002 0.00 1T 16-May-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 36,044.69 GNMA 11 POOL#0090023 20-May-2002 3,149.59 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 1220/2026 DD 12101/9 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 20-May-2002 0.00 11Jum2002 9.36.13 Executive Wwkbench Q Mellou Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-MAY-2002-31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41,662.41 GNMA 11 POOL 0090088M 20-Ma3-2002 4,895.29 36225CC20 7.375%0 612 0/2 0 2 7 DO 06/01/ 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 20-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 290,211.83 GNMA 11 POOL 0090408X 20-May-2002 25,367.99 36225CN28 6.500%05/20/2030 DO 051011 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 20-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32,500.69 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 20-May-2002 2,959.16 36225CNM4 VAR RT 0420/2030 DO 04/011 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 20-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GMAC NTS 20-May-2002 19,848.75 370425QV5 VAR RT 0 811 82 0 0 3 DO 08/171 19-May-2002 0.00 IT 20-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MTN W TR 00459 20-May-2002 4,795.00 073928VC4 FLTG RT 12/01/2003 DO 08/171 19-May-2002 0.00 IT 20-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN 8TR006 20-May-2002 2,333.33 17120QESO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/ 19-May-2002 0.00 IT 20-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 21-May-2002 112,030.00 31364CN79 6.5909/.0521/2002 DO 0521/9 21-May-2002 0.00 IT 21-May-2002 0.00 11Jun-1002 9:36:13 Executive",k6each" Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 30,000.00 - FEDERAL HOME IN BKS CONS BD 21-May-2002 849.00 3133M8VT8 5.6601/6 0521/2002 DO 05/21/ 21-May-2002 0.00 IT 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 21-May-2002 629.59 3136FOYW6 VAR RT 02212003 DO 08211 21-May-2002 0.00 IT 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,033,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NT 21-May-2002 4,980.85 313397XB2 MAT 05212002 21-May-2002 0.00 IT 21-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 23-May-2002 5,325.25 313589XDO MAT 05232002 23-May-2002 0.00 IT 23-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,652.92 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 23-Mey-2002 13,652.92 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/00 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 23-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 628,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 24-May-2002 2,512.00 19121EEQ2 05242002 24-May-2002 0.00 IT 24-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 28-May-2002 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500a/e09/252018 01-May-2002 OAO IT 28-May-2002 0.00 11-Jun-2002 9.36:13 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 42 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-MAY-2002 -31-MAY-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 642.95 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 28-May-2002 2,462.28 39810WAE4 7.4301%06/01/2003 DO 02/29/0 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 28-May-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 29-May-2002 2,479.17 02581SEV9 0529/2002 29-May-2002 0.00 IT 29-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 31-May-2002 6,006.30 302998GE3 7.500% 12/012030 DD 10/2119 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 31-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 8000-11150 31-May-2002 6,002.09 302998GE3 7.500°/a 12/012030 DD 1021/9 01-May-2002 0.00 IT 31-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-May-2002 143,750.00 9128272M3 3.375%01115/2007 DD 011151 0.00 CD 31-May-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 31-May-2002 34,485.00 9128274Y5 3.875%01/152009 DD 011151 0.00 CD 31-May-2002 0.00 IIJun-1001 9:36:13 ExmUw BCFkbenM— 1 FAHR COMMITTEE Me6/12eOng/02 Date To6/2ed.6/02 or .Dr. 'r AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR02-54 16(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: John Weingarden, Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Increase the Temporary Employment Services authorization by an additional $250,000, raising the authorized amount from $1,300,000 to $1,550,000 for the remainder of FY 01-02. SUMMARY Board Item 19, approved in March 2002, increased the authorized Temporary Employment Services allocation of$1,000,000 to $1,300,000 for the remainder of FY 01-02. This initial increase did not anticipate the total needs of the District for the remainder of FY 01-02, and another authorization is needed. In March 2002 the Engineering Department transitioned to a new Operational Model for Engineering capital project support. This Professional Services Agreement (PSA), based on General Counsel's recommendations, was expected to be implemented in December, and to reduce the impact of these services on the Temporary Employment Services authorization. Because the initial $1,000,000 Temporary Services allocation for FY 01-02 was utilized to cover both capital projects, as well as non-capital temporary labor costs through March, rather than December, the initial authorization was insufficient. The initial $300,000 addition was anticipated to be adequate to cover non-capital project temporary labor costs for the remainder of FY 01-02. It was unanticipated that the amount of capital project related invoices outstanding for services prior to the implementation date of the PSA would significantly deplete the $300,000. Additionally, it was unforeseen that not all of the Engineering Department's temporary employees would fall under the PSA for capital projects. These two unexpected demands on the authorization will require additional authorization. Regular temporary resources will continue to be required in Customer and Network Support, Programming and Database Systems, Process Control Integration Divisions, and administrative support. An additional authorization of$250,000 for a total of $1,550,000 is requested for FY 01-02. The transition to the capital projects PSA should allow the expenses associated with temporary staffing to remain within the established $1,000,000 temporary budget in subsequent years. GAnftrgendaLL rd AgenW Regw QD020w0Age,4 Re, 60ZIIe I61d)Ter ary EpWy tSml dw Rewmd: MM6 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See attachments. ALTERNATIVES 1) Deny the request and discontinue the use of temporary employment services. 2) Hire full time regular employees on Limited Term Contracts to support a Division through a peak period. Limited term employees are regular full time employees placed on contracts with a specific end date. These employees, during the duration of their contracts, would be entitled to all benefits and provisions of regular full time employees. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS March 27, 2002 Board Item Number 19 G'�x dra gma�dAwe RKm W2B ,d Awm Repnns`#ONiem 1qd)Tm ary Erry,o nl$eM0.5.dK Rnnaed. fl OW Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS IMeetiigDae T°�� AGENDA REPORT 19 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator. John Weingarden, Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services budget allocation of $300,000, raising the total budgeted amount from$1,000,000 to $1,300,000 for the remainder of FY 01-02. SUMMARY FAHR Item 99-50, approved in June 1999, established $1,000,000 annually in funding for temporary employment services for five subsequent years. Because this initial staff recommendation to FAHR limited the total amount of the temporary services budget to $1,000,000 it did not accurately reflect the needs of the District in FY 99-00, and a shortfall to the temporary services budget occurred. Subsequently, FAHR Item 00-45, approved in May 2000, was presented to request additional funding to cover the shortage during FY 00-01 for temporary services supporting the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and to provide a forecast for additional funds for the next three years. A total cost of$3,370,000 was forecast for FY 01-02, and was to be proposed and approved as needed. During the first quarter of FY 01-02, a proposal to transition to a new Operational Model for Engineering support was made. At that time staff began development of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) based on General Counsel's recommendations. Therefore the$1,000,000 Temporary Services Budget for FY 01-02 was anticipated to be adequate to cover the non-capital temporary labor costs,which would remain relatively constant. However, the unanticipated Huntington Beach Study began in May 2001, and continued into the current fiscal year. In December 2001, $810,000 had been spent for temporary labor. Capital projects accounted for 50.2%of this, as the PSA had not yet been implemented;therefore, a shortfall of$300,000 to the temporary services budget is anticipated. Regular temporary resources will also continue to be required in Customer and Network Support, Programming and Database Systems, Process Control Integration Divisions, and administrative support. Additionally, regular temporary staffing funds were expended by approximately$80,000 due to the unanticipated temporary services requirements for the Huntington Beach Study. This amount reduced the total temporary budget by 8%. This unforeseen project impacted the amount originally budgeted for administrative temporary staffing, and added to the premature depletion of the original $1,000,000. Gk, duQWda�AWW R�2eoaro Agwee Rarmueaoana.,+ad)l�e„psis«.;m.am R—. arm Page 3 The transition to the PSA, as well as the utilization of Limited Term Contract Engineers should allow the expenses associated with temporary staffing to remain within the established $1,000,000 temporary budget in subsequent years. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See attachments. ALTERNATIVES 1) Deny the request and discontinue the use of temporary employment services. 2) Hire full time regular employees on Limited Term Contracts to support a Division through a peak period. Limited term employees are regular full time employees placed on contracts with a specific end date. These employees, during the duration of their contracts, would be entitled to all benefits and provisions of regular full time employees. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS FAHR Item Number FAHR99-50 FAHR Item Number FAHR00-45 Gh 4WY �Ag� 1GEI.Te FnN% tSeNmbx wmee:vmee Page 4 FAHR COMMITTEE MeetingWte To Bd.ofDir. 619199 6/26/99 AGENDA REPORT RMNGmber rtemNumber FAHR99-50 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Award contracts for Temporary Employment Services (Specification No. P-186)to the following support staffing firms for a period of one year, renewable for a period of four years, and cancelable at any time, for a total amount not to exceed $1 million: General Agency • Apple One Technical Agencies • Principal Technical Services, Inc. - Engineering and IT Personnel • EPC Consultants, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • DDB Engineering, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Two Roads Professional Resources, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Project Partners - Engineering Personnel • Tek Systems- IT Personnel • Lab Support - Laboratory personnel 2. Authorize staff to enter into additional agreements with other temporary firms as they become known to District's staff, provided it is within budget guidelines. SUMMARY The District has typically had short-tens, low-volume temporary staffing needs and has contracted with one or two agencies to fulfill them. However, temporary staffing utilization is increasing with additional Engineering and IT projects. Since the increase in temporary costs exceeds$100,000, Board approval is needed. Three-quarters of the Districts temporary labor needs are due to the increase in capital projects for the next five years. The Engineering department has already obtained approval from the Planning and Design Committee for the increase in the temporary staffing budget and will continue to provide the PDC with regular updates. Human Resources has interviewed each company listed in the recommendation and is satisfied that they can meet administrative requirements of doing business with the District. In the General Agency category, Apple One has agreed to a 40-50% markup rate for general, clerical, and light industrial staffing. Other companies have been used G:Mq.Ela��RpeMa Pepnb,2Wi B Mft Mf Repw1YO ==IW)Te,pwery E,ryco nlS M.d= RCNYL:vm•e Page 5 g a6ed aww :w M =w'rswx���^��3�1'(oMl wzrzasw�n a✓+av wwe[consv�n�'w�v w�wo�en¢p a��'� in the past, but only Apple One has been able to consistently supply the District with high quality temporary employees. The technical firths work a little differently than the general temporary agencies. Instead of negotiating a markup rate up front, the Engineering and IT departments plan to put temporary staffing opportunities out to all of the qualified firms above and have them compete against each other for each assignment. Those companies who find the most qualified candidate at the lowest price will be selected on a case-by-case basis. Instead of listing out all of the requirements that the temporary staffing firms need in order to do business with the District, a copy of the Districts generic temporary services contract is attached. Each company will need to sign it, or one like it, and agree to the proper insurance and employment practices. Because there may be other technical agencies we wish to use, and because the posting of the jobs will be an openly competitive process, staff is asking for the authority to enter into similar agreements with other agencies without having to return to the Board to approve each agency. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not to exceed $1 million BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: J.O.contractual services and capital Improvement Budgets) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Hire additional regular, full-time employees for an indefinite period or on a contractual basis. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Sample generic Temporary Services Contract O:Yxp.dd*.ft� .d A,nW RO�ft.M AMM RnWbMv0 160).Tan wEngymBnl9enlw.tac Rd W: v Page 7 FAHR COMMITTEE MeeiingDate TOBd.afD!n 5/10100 5/24/00 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FANR00-45 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources Originator: John Weingarden, Human Resources Analyst Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services total contracts by $200,000,from$1,000,000 to $1,200,000 for remainder of Fiscal Year 99-00, and approve funding in the amount of$2,402,000 for Fiscal Year 00-01. SUMMARY Temporary services for the District are comprised of both capital and non-capital projects. 15%of the temp needs are non-capital and 85% are capital. Additional temporary staffing is required as a result of a peak in capital improvement projects outlay during the five-year period through fiscal year 2004. This need for capital-related temporary services is in addition to the need for services for daily operations at the District. The need for temporary services to support the projected future capital improvement program was discussed with and approved by the PDC Committee in April 1999 (see attached). The Temporary Employment Services Agenda Item, FAHR99-50, approved by the FAHR Committee, estimated $1,000,000 per year cap on all temporary employment services for the District, included capital as well as non-capital related temporary services. We anticipate a $200,000 shortfall for this fiscal year. As the capital improvement program continues to increase over the next four years, capital- related temporary services for engineering, inspection, and support services will need to be increased. Based on the current capital-improvement program/outlay schedule, the District will need an additional $200,000 in temporary employment services for FY 99-00, including non-capital related temporary employment services. For FY 00-01 this amount is anticipated to increase to $2,402,000 and may reach a high of$3,870,000 FY 02-03. The increase in capital-related resource needs is a result of capital projects that will move from the design process to the construction phase. As the design work moves to the construction phase, additional staff will be needed. The cost of the capital-related temporary services will be paid by the capital project budget. These costs do not impact the cost per million gallons. Staff is recommending the above-described increases in Temporary Employment Services. Staff recognizes that the degree of escalating costs associated with temporary contract service-workers are unexpected,and previously not fo G\v9.Meb0eMe8reN AWO aaMds120d]B MAWn FP�VJ 16(d1.TMpnnYE GyY Se A= wa.ed: agave Page 8 be conducting a cost analysis during the first half of FY 00-01 to accurately address the advantage of regular employees verses contract service workers. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Year Capital Non-Capital Total 99-00 $ 970,000 $230,000 $1,200,000 00-01 2,125,000 277,000 $2,402,000 01 —02 3,095,000 275,000 $3,370,000 02—03 3,595,000 275,000 $3,870,000 03—04 2,475,000 275,000 $2,750,000 " For information only, funding amounts to be proposed and approved in subsequent Fiscal Years. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Discussion The Districts staff has recognized a significant need for contract-service workers due to an increase in capital projects for the next five years. Our capital improvement project budget is expected to increase from $70,000,000 today to $198,700,000 by fiscal year 2005. As information, this capital outlay represents over 180 various projects throughout the treatment and collections facility. Most of these projects were identified in the Strategic Plan adopted by the Board in 1999. Other projects are added to the CIP that have been identified by staff and recommended by the EMT and the General Manager. The projected capital outlay for fiscal year 2000-01 is $83,007,000. In April 1999, the Engineering Department presented a program to the PDC Committee that would provide contract-service worker resources to conduct the capital project work. The proposed program consisted of hiring contract-engineering services during the associated five-year peak capital outlay period. FAHR Item 99-50, in June 1999, requested $1,000,000 in funding for temporary employment services which included the proposed capital improvement contract engineering staff. Due to the fact that the staff recommendation to FAHR included the contract engineering services staff for the capital-related program, as well as non-capital related temporary services, the $1,000,000 did not accurately reflect the needs of the District. The purpose of this agenda item is to request additional funding to cover the shortage during the current fiscal year for temporary services supporting the CIP, and to provide a forecast for additional funds for the next three years. (These amounts will be subject to approval by the board when the budget for each of those three years are adopted each June.) G:MyAIa�fte RepM5WW B ftm PKMSA9 UN 16(tl).Tarywery�oy l9wNces.hc PMxa: erzaGe Page 9 As the capital improvement program activities ramp up, additional contract-services will be required for project management, design, reviews, coordination, and inspection. For example, as the current design projects move into construction, additional construction engineers and inspectors must be obtained. Staff has estimated that additional contract service-workers will ultimately be required for capital-related activities. These additional temporary resources will be required in the Design, Process Engineering, Construction, Customer and Network Support, Programming and Database Systems and the Process Control Integration Divisions. The increase in capital outlay has impacted the O&M Department as a result of coordinating capital activities with the Engineering Department, reviewing construction plans and specifications, developing facility process-control strategy for the new projects, planning for construction sequencing and connections to existing facilities, assisting with plant start-ups and shut-downs,visiting various collection and treatment plant sites with consultants, attending meetings, arranging for sewer flow monitoring and/or video taping as required by capital project needs, and coordination between capital activities and ongoing treatment plant operations. In addition, the temporary engineering resources will be used to ensure field staff safety,for locating utilities, and for reviewing designs for operability and maintenance friendliness. The O&M Department currently has one contract-engineer in the Process Engineering Division to support the treatment plant capital improvement program and requires a second to provide support for the collections system capital program. The requirements for Information Technology related services and support continue to rise above the Departmenfs current resource level. Many of these requirements are short-term or project oriented and can be met by augmenting permanent staff with temporary contract support. This strategy gives Information Technology the flexibility to manage its peak workloads associated with programming, analysis, project management, and hardware/software support. Further, this strategy will provide Information Technology with the temporary staff required to support the increased volume of capital project work now going into design. Fundinq Funding for capital improvement contract service-workers is already recognized through the particular capital project being worked on, and is budgeted by the particular capital budget process. The temporary service-worker contracts for operating requirements are budgeted within the Operating Fund. ALTERNATIVES 1) Deny the request and put certain projects on hold. 2) Hire full time regular employees on Limited Term Contracts to support a Division through a peak period. Limited term employees are regular full time employees placed on contracts with a specific end date. These employees, during the duration of their contracts, would be entitled to all benefits and provisions of regular full time employees. GM W��E Ayvb ANwY�1 W 2 BOaN M®��' 1 HUI.TC,pya,Y 6TbY^ti SswtbOz Page 10 CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS FAHR Item Number FAHR99-50 PDC Item Number PDC99-20 G.wp4m%gontlalg ftwft Bo "eM RepMs�Mt=16d)Temp Brtoy nt SeMCs.M R W; R fflo Page 11 FAHIR COMMITTEE MeebrgDate To Bo.ofDir. 06/12/02 06/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR02-55 16(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: PROPOSED FY 2002-03 OPERATING, CAPITAL, DEBT/COP SERVICE AND SELF-INSURANCE BUDGETS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve proposed Operating, Capital, Debt/COP Service and Self-Insurance Budgets for 2002-03, as follows Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $65,421,200 Worker's Compensation Self Insurance $429,000 General Liability and Property Self-Insurance $2,429,500 Collection System Operating $15,135,000 Capital Improvement Program $154,400,000 Debt/COP Service $38,995,000 SUMMARY The 2002-03 Budget is enclosed for the Committee's consideration. The Budget has been presented to the OMTS and PDC Committees at their regular June meetings in order to allow each Standing Committee an opportunity to review the proposal prior to the June Board meeting. Although each Committee has had an opportunity to review the proposal, it remains the responsibility of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee to recommend approval of the Joint Works Operating and Capital Budgets. The remaining budgets are also being presented to the FAHR Committee as a result of consolidation. The FAHR Committee is requested to recommend that the Board of Directors approve this budget. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed 2002-03 Budget (Directors, you have been previously provided a copy of this report. If you have misplaced it, a replacement will be provided to you at the June 26 h meeting.) GGS:lc G:w.y.wepaw`P'4M�A•w�sxwzewra ape,ge Rlppb`O6oznNn &el.�.aoc new.a. vmmi Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date ToBd.ofdr. 6/12/02 6/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR02-59 16(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENEWAL OF THE DISTRICT'S ALL-RISK PROPERTY AND EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE PROGRAM, FY 2002-03 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Renew the District's All-Risk Property and Earthquake Insurance Program for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003, in an amount to be determined. SUMMARY The District's All-Risk Property and Earthquake insurance coverage expires June 25, 2002 and is now up for renewal for fiscal year 2002-03. The All-Risk insurance program provides for comprehensive coverage for the District's real and personal property from all perils including fire, flood, earthquake, and business interruption. At the date this report was prepared, proposals for FY 2002-03 All-Risk program are still being received due to the hardening cycle that property and casualty industry is still experiencing, the reduction of insurance carriers and in the insurance coverages being offered, and the competition amongst the remaining carriers and programs. Staff is still seeking renewal with continuation of an enhanced $300 million blanket loss limit for fire damage, coupled with some degree of earthquake coverage. A full report with recommended insurance coverages premiums will be provided at the meeting. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) G 4y.01aepm0a\Boa,O Alm.RPp QW]B-1d A,e .Re W.... 111—16(1),WoceBY Ins Re1.1 Eo[ R.,,,. W= Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The District's FY 2001-02 All-Risk Program has covered the District's property with a $300 million blanket loss limit for all perils, including flood damage, and a $15 million sub-limit for earthquake damage. The deductible for an earthquake related claim is $25 million. The deductible for all other perils is $25,000 per occurrence. Multiple insurance carriers underwrite the All-Risk program to distribute risk exposure and to ensure competitively bid premiums. Thus, the District's premium costs are controlled, while obtaining maximum coverage levels for the District. 2002-03 Renewal Cycle For a fourth consecutive year, Driver Alliant (Driver), the District's Broker of Record, marketed renewal of the District's All-Risk Program through a nationwide joint purchase property insurance program called Public Entity Property Insurance Program (PEPIP). It is important to note that the joint purchase property insurance program involves no pooling or sharing of coverage with any other public entities. As a result of the significant purchasing power($60 million combined annual premium) of the PEPIP joint purchase program, the FY 2002-03 renewal option is expected to maintain the existing $300 million blanket coverage, and will mitigate premium cost However, earthquake coverage is getting more difficult to obtain as the number of insurance providers and insurance coverages continue to dwindle. Staff will be providing a complete report along with recommendations on an all-risk property and earthquake insurance renewal program for 2002-03 at the June 12, 2002 meeting. Recommendation The 2002-03 All-Risk Property Insurance Program is recommended for renewal through the PEPIP joint purchase program with a $300 million blanket loss limit for perils. A proposal on Earthquake coverage and the premium cost for the entire All-Risk Property and Earthquake Insurance Program for FY 2002-03 will be reported on at the meeting of June 12, 2002 prior to seeking the Committee's approval. Based on preliminary information on premiums, staff is certain that sufficient funds have been budgeted to cover premium costs. ALTERNATIVES N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A GAxy.plaN0en0ar9oar0 A,nOa R.pw 003 B-1d AgenW Rep00aN803111em 16(B.P,.pv,Ina R..'Doc Remaea: e¢omt Page 2 FAHIR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To an.otDir. 6/12/02 6126/002 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number FAHR02-60 16(n) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENEWAL OF THE DISTRICT'S EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE PROGRAM, FY 2002-03 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Renew the District's Excess General Liability Insurance Program for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003, in an amount to be determined. SUMMARY Staff recommends the renewal of the District's $25 million Excess General Liability Insurance Program for FY 2002-03. The coverage is provided through the California Municipal Excess Liability Program (CAMEL). At present, the District is in the third and final year of a three-year commitment to the CAMEL program, approved by the Board in December 1998 after completing a competitive bid selection process. Approval of this agenda item will continue the District's $25 million liability coverage through the CAMEL program through the third year of this three-year commitment. At this time, final premium costs.are being negotiated and will be presented to the Committee on June 12. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) G\wp ElaNgenba�rJ ApenW PepMs@0@ BoaN Pgenba RepaslOWIDlem 1fi�glEvsess Gabillly Eo[ Renaea: WMI Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The current liability insurance program provides the District with a $25 million policy of comprehensive coverage for municipal liability, bodily injury and property damage, and personal injury. The program was structured to also include Employment Practices, and Public Officials Errors & Omissions coverage. The $25 million coverage is per occurrence, with a self-insured deductible of$100,000 per occurrence. Since 1997, the Employment Practices portion of coverage was enhanced from a $2 million sub-limit, to the full $25 million policy limit. 2002-03 Renewal Cycle Two important advantages of a multi-year renewal of the District's participation in the CAMEL general liability insurance program include guaranteed coverage and cost stability. When the District entered into the CAMEL program in July 1996, we obtained an annual premium cost not to exceed $125,000 in the first year, a commitment for a two-percent premium reduction in the second year of the program, and a five-percent premium reduction in the third year. Actual premium reductions obtained during this first three-year period were more than ten percent. A three-year agreement was reached in 1998-99 that included a level annual premium not to exceed $111,492 for the first$10 million layer of insurance coverage. In 2000-01, a new three year commitment was reached that allows for the renewal of the District's Excess General Liability insurance policy that guarantees continuation of the District's first $10 million layer of insurance coverage, while placing a maximum on premium increases of ten percent per year through 2002-03. The premium on the next $15 million layer of insurance coverage excess of$10 million is subject to current market pricing. Dividend Rebates Additionally, the District again becomes eligible for an annual CAMEL program dividend rebate in the amount of 15 to 20 percent of premium cost that began with the FY 1999- 2000 renewal period. Each year, the dividend rebate will be calculated based on the loss experience of the program for the program year that expired two years prior to the calculation. Dividends are then paid to program participants in equal annual increments for the two years following the calculation. Dividends were obtained in the amount of$21,450 covering the 1997-98 policy year. However, no dividends will be paid for the 1998-99 policy year due to loss experience. The District is currently waiting for the 1999-00 loss experience results. Recommendation The 2002-03 Excess General Liability Insurance Program is recommended for renewal through the CAMEL joint purchase program. This policy provides for$25 million of c1ry.auugneaawa�peMv rtepm93oox ame nperw FeL'O'YB,NNm 1E�Y1 Eons WGIMErc n,„Ya: vmu, Page 2 comprehensive coverage for municipal liability, bodily injury and property damage, and personal injury, with a self-insured deductible of$100,000 per occurrence. The premium cost for FY 2002-03 will be reported on June 12, 2002 prior to obtaining the Committee's approval. Based on preliminary information on premiums, staff is certain that sufficient funds have been budgeted to cover premium costs. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEGA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A c+.p.auxpnwuma germ hgoduam ewa,yeN, uwanem,tlm Wb Wem w.e.a:vmm Page 3 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT May 13, 2002, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on May 13, 2002. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode Iry Pickier, Chairman Russell Patterson Phil Anthony Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Larry Kraemer Jr. Brian Brady, Alternate No. 2 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Laurann Cook, Alternate No. 3 Jan Flory, Alternate No. 2 Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors Directors: Kelli Bum-Roy, Bruce Chalmers, Dick Corneille Paul Walker Jan Debay —Camp Dresser& McKee Staff: Wes Bannister Steve Tedesco—Tetra Tech Blake Anderson Denis Bilodeau Bill Butler, Dave Mosher, Abdul Rashidi David Ludwin Staff: —Montgomery Watson Harza Lisa Murphy Virginia Grebbien Dennis MacLain — City of Huntington Beach Bob Ooten Debra Burris Bob Finn —Brown & Caldwell Wendy Sevenandt Steve Conklin Richard Bell - IRWD Counsel: Andrew Czomy Thom Coughran — City of Santa Ana Brad Hogin Joanne Daugherty Doug Korthof, Joey Racano Tom Dawes - Ocean Outfall Group Bill Everest Jill Everhart Jenny Glasser Clark Ida John Kennedy Mike Markus Rafael Mujeriego Lily Pham Cathy Skousen Laura Thomas Ron Wildermuth - 1 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes May 13, 2002 , CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Meeting Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Anthony and carried, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held April 22, 2002 were approved as mailed. Director Pickier asked if any audience member wished to address the Committee on items not on the agenda and two speakers, Joey Racano and Doug Korthof, Ocean Outfall Group, expressed their displeasure with the Orange County Sanitation District 301 h waiver permit. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Amendment No. 5 to Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc. OCWD General Manager Grebbien recommended issuance of Amendment No. 5 to Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.'s Professional Services Agreement providing a 2.7% cost- of-living increase, in accordance with the terms of said agreement. The following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Anderson and carried, the Committee recommended approval by the OCWD and OCSD Boards to authorize issuance of Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc., in accordance with their Professional Services Agreement, a cost-of-living increase of 2.7% for 2002, increasing the authorized amount $557,697, from $35,333,107 to an amount not to exceed $35,890,804. 3. Award Task Order with Montgomery Watson Harza for Limited Construction Management Services Ms. Grebbien reported that the OCSD Board has previously approved the construction management contract with Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH), but that the OCWD Board has not approved the contract because it is awaiting the reevaluation of the project. She recommended that a small contract be approved to MWH for design review for constructability and construction management issues as an "early-start"for the full contract that may be issued in July. She reported that Abdul Rashid!will be the MWH project manager. Mr. Markus reported that a constructability review is needed for the 40% design drawings for the advanced wastewater treatment facilities (AWTF). He reported that staff has reviewed the drawings in the last couple of months, but did not have the resources necessary to do a constructability analysis of those drawings. He reported - 2 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes May 13, 2002 that this contract would be for MWH to do the constructability review on the 40% AWTF contract and will cover approximately 80% of the drawings. Director Eckenrode asked if another contract would have to be awarded after two months or would the construction management contract be awarded? Ms. Grebbien reported that a proposed work plan to do a review of the project and answer questions will be held in a workshop format with the OCWD Board and should be completed in June. She reported that this contract, if awarded, preserves the option for us to continue to move forward with MWH should the OCWD Board, pending the out come of the project review, elect to do so. Mr. Dawes reminded the Committee that it can award a contract up to $100,000 for professional services and that no further Board action is needed. After discussion, the following action was taken. Upon motion of Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried with Director Anderson abstaining, Issuance of a Task Order to Montgomery Watson Harza in the amount of$49,950 for limited construction management services during the next two months, with this amount being subtracted from their proposal for providing construction management services for the entire project if the OCWD Board approves that proposal. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 4. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: A. The Department of Water Resources' (DWR) staff is recommending that a $30 million grant be approved for the project and noted that it is the largest grant awarded in the State of California and that it should be approved by DWR next month. He noted that Directors Eckenrode and Pickier traveled to Sacramento to meet with DWR officials. Director Eckenrode stated that he and Director Pickier met with Tom Hannigan, DWR Director, through a meeting set up by Chris Townsend, Townsend Public Affairs, and suggested that a thank you letter be drafted to the governor and Mr. Hannigan for their efforts in soliciting this grant for the project. He noted that this grant and the others received, for an approximate total of$100 million, should bring the project cost down. B. Staff has completed all requirements for the SAWPA grant of$37 million and will be invoicing SAWPA for back monies spent on the project. - 3 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes May 13, 2002 C. Discussed consideration of a new meeting time and noted that a survey would be sent to the Committee for their preference. OCWD Public Information Officer Ron Wildermuth reported that project endorsements were received from Hoag Hospital, the Black Chamber of Commerce, the ex-president of the California State Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Hispanic Businessmen's Association, and a pledge of support from the Filipino Chamber of Commerce. He also reported that Jim Carlton, Wall Street Journal, was given a project briefing and that an article should appear in about a month. REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGERS Ms. Grebbien reported that staff has incorporated eight areas of concerns of the project into an OCWD Work Plan (handout), and will incorporate these issues into a Board workshop that will be held in June. She noted that these issues will relate to the overall District finances and re-answer some fundamental questions on the project. She reported that she expects to have direction from the OCWD Board on status, timing, staging implementation, and financial impact and report back to the Committee in July. Mr. Anderson reported that OCSD will be doing the same thing in parallel to the OCWD Board and he has had two meetings with his senior staff to make sure that we resurface all issues that have been raised with a hope of having an unequivocal move toward a completion of the project. He noted that they should have an honest review at the staff level initially and that review will be used and reported back to the Committee. He noted that he expects that the two technical staffs from each agency would have an honest and transparent evaluation on the status of the project for the Committee's consideration in July. He reported that two special OCSD Board meetings, May 15 and June 19, will be held on matters relating to ocean discharge issues. He urged OCWD Directors to consider attending these workshops to hear the independent researchers' findings pertaining to the ocean mechanics and the discharge plume. Mr. Anderson stated that the OCSD Special Board meeting on May 15 will start at 6:00 p.m. and that the program will be taped. Director Patterson stated that he appreciates that the general managers of both the OCWD and OCSD are going through the evaluations, but everything he has heard tonight has been done before. He asked what has not been done before that is going to be done this time? Director Anthony responded that at this stage of the project, before construction, there is nothing wrong with looking at the project again and an independent review of the situation is needed. Director Pickier noted that since there has been changes in OCWD management and Board members, it is essential that all feel comfortable with the project. Director Patterson expressed two concerns: 1)that there could be some other delay that cannot be anticipated at this time which could precipitate loss of grant money; and 2) that delays could increase the project cost. -4 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes May 13, 2002 Ms. Grebbien stated that those are legitimate concerns and it is incumbent on us to do everything we can to mitigate and control costs, ensure that we do not lose any grant monies, and appropriately adjust the project to benefit the Districts. Mr. Anderson stated that all questions have been answered before, but that a clearer understanding of the direction of the project and all issues need to be addressed, and then the Boards can make a decision to go forward or not. Director Patterson asked what the issues have to do with the estimated completion of the O&M Agreement. Ms. Grebbien responded that the O&M Agreement had been discussed at the last OCW D Board meeting. She stated that she had met independently with the JCC members and Director Flory to review the Draft Agreement and she hopes to reach a conclusion by the end of July. Director Debay stated that she has been calling for a joint meeting for all of the Board members. She expressed her concerns about the acquired permits expiring, losses of grant monies, perhaps requirements for another EIR, and the project slow down. Ms. Grebbien announced that Tom Dawes has resigned and his last day will be May 24. REPORT OF COUNSEL OCW D General Counsel Ide reported that Pall has not served papers to date, and that he will keep everyone advised. DIRECTORS COMMENTS Director Flory requested a presentation on OCSD's 301 h waiver at an OCWD Board meeting. Director Bilodeau congratulated staff on the $30 million DWR grant. Director Pickier requested that the DWR summary be sent to the JCC members. GPAC COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, June 10 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. - 5 - y BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date T0Bd 0102r W AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number llc Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRE-SELECTION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Trojan Technologies as the Ultraviolet Light (UV)Equipment manufacturer for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR) based on lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$20,253,000, and a total capital cost of$9,749,405, plus tax; (2)Approve a Pre- Selection Agreement between Orange County Water District(OCWD)and Trojan Technologies to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000, to be equally shared between OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District; (3) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the UV Equipment to the construction contract to install the demonstration UV system at a total cost of$849,842, plus tax; and (4) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWO to assign the value of the UV Equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV system at a total estimated capital cost of$8,649,563, plus tax. SUMMARY • In March 2002, the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) recommended the actions as written above regarding the award of UV disinfection equipment for the GWR System. • The Board of Directors deferred action back to staff to address a letter Issued by Calgon Carbon Corporation dated March 1, 2002. • Staff has addressed the issues in a response letter dated April 9, 2002, to Calgon Carbon Corporation. • The Chair of the JCC received a letter dated April 18, 2002, from Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez recommending award of future contracts to United State firms. • Staff has addressed the"Buy American" concern set forth in her letter and presents the reasons to reconsider awarding to Trojan Technologies in the additional information section below. • Staff recommends selecting Trojan Technologies as the UV Equipment manufacturer for the GWR System. • Approval is requested to award a $250,000 contract to Trojan Technologies for engineering design documents at this time. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The value of the agreement award for each agency with this action is$250,000 to be equally shared with OCWD in the amount of$125,000. The authorization of funds was made in October 2001,for the engineering documents only in the amount of$125,000. There is no increase in the cost for engineering documents. Authorization of expenditures for the UV Equipment will be requested with the award of the construction contracts in the future. Although the proposal by Trojan Technologies was over the A.W—a 8 Page es Y engineer's estimate, a budget increase is not requested at this time. Sufficient Funds are available existing in contingency for the increase over the engineers estimate, but adjustments will not be requested until the construction contracts are awarded. BUDGETIMPACT ® - This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2001-02 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Please refer to the Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In October 2001,the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) Board of Directors authorized issuance of a Request for Proposals for the pre-selection of Ultraviolet Light(UV) Equipment estimated at $10,250,000, and granted authority to the Orange County Water District(OCW D) Board of Directors to award a contract for equipment design in the amount of$250,000, also granted authority to the OCW D Board of Directors to assign the value of equipment to construction contracts for installation. The request for proposals was sent to four firms specializing in UV disinfection equipment and two proposals were received. Proposals were received from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies on February 27, 2002. Both proposals were over the engineer's estimate of$10,250,000 with tax included in the total cost. Trojan Technologies proposes the lowest capital cost of$10,439,990.61 with tax included at 7.75%and the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$20,253,000. With this approval, a contract in the amount of$250,000 will be awarded to Trojan Technologies for engineering design documents. The value of the UV disinfection equipment as proposed by Trojan Technologies will be assigned to the demonstration unit construction contractor and the permanent facilities construction contractor. These contracts are scheduled for bid and award in the Summer of 2002 and Spring of 2003. These installation contracts will be brought before the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)and the OCSD and OCWD Board of Directors in accordance with the adopted procedures that will be in effect at that time. The Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)approved the recommended action on March 11, 2002. Please refer to the attached March 11, 2002 JCC Agenda Item Submittal. Staff reported on the Calgon Carbon Corporation letter and responded at the April 22, 2002 JCC meeting. Staff also distributed a letter dated April 18, 2002,from Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez at the JCC meeting on April 22, 2002. Staff has investigated the issues brought forth in the letter and recommends the Board consideration of the recommendation to award a contract to Trojan Technologies for the following reasons: 1. Considering all principal Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR)equipment; Microfiltration/Reverse Osmosis/Ultraviolet Light the majority of expenditures will be from domestic manufacturers (all pre-qualified Reverse Osmosis manufacturers are domestic); Page 2 2. The "Buy American" provision in Federal regulations (40 CFR, 35-936-13.d)indicates that domestic equipment may be used in preference to non-domestic equipment if the cost difference is no more than 6%, and a greater differential Is deemed unreasonable; Calgon's .. equipment Trost is 24%greater than Trojan's costs (12% higher in life-cycle cost); 3. Because of the size of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR) construction contracts, it is expected (not guaranteed)that only domestic contractors will submit bids; 4. Recent questions raised by Calgon concerning the technical and financial viability of Trojan Technologies proposal have been resolved to the satisfaction of the GWR System staff; and, 5. This action only involves a $250,000 commitment to complete the final design of the Ultraviolet Light Equipment(now one of the critical path items of the AWTF design);future authorizations to award construction contracts for installation of this equipment will be approved by the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)Board of Directors. ALTERNATIVES Alternatives to issuing a proposal for pre-selection of the UV Equipment included pre-purchase of the equipment or preparing final designs for all equipment options. Pre-purchase of the equipment was not selected to reduce liability to the agencies and place liability for the equipment on the Contractor. With substantial differences in each equipment design, preparing final designs for each manufacturer was determined to be cost prohibitive. CEQA FINDINGS The OCSD and Orange County Water District(OCWD) Boards of Directors certified the Environmental Impact Report for the GWR System on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001, Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. March 11, 2002 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Ultraviolet Light Equipment Pre-selection. 3. Letter dated March 1, 2002 from Calgon Carbon Corporation. 4. Letter dated April 9, 2002 from OCWD to Calgon Carbon Corporation. 5. Letter dated April 18, 2002,from Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez. 6. April 22, 2002 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Ultraviolet Equipment Update WTS:sa Gntg1obaMgenda Draft Repor Udnt 13 erdsU-36-W Award-062602.doc awisea:e�mee Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET RENSED AUTHORIgD AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET IODATE REQUEST TO DATE TO DATE(%), Decl Development S 700,000 S 0,000 It 4,00 $ 4,000 S 4,000 S 4,000 100% Studies/Permilt ' 0,000,000 3 4,000,000 $ 0.000,000 S 0,0100,000 3 4,000,000 10011i Consultant PSA• $ 7,500.000 s 16.000.000 f 16d0D.000 $ 16,156.330 S 18,158,330 3 3,000.000 17% Design Staff $ 2.3,19.000 S I.mg. 00 3 1,309,000 $ 1,309,0o0 S 1,349,000 S 2,500,000 185% Construclion Contract" $ 86.481.500 S 137,500,000 5137,500,000 $ 9,602,655 3 9.602.655 S 0% Construction Administration... $ 2.653.900 S 6.021,000 S 6.021,000 S 5,096,519 $ 5.496,519 S D% Construction Inspection S 9,305.61D0 3 326.000 $ 326000 S S - S O% Contingency S 12.895.000 $ 15.100,000 $ 15,100,000 $ $ - s 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 121.925.000 S 162.700.000 S S 18]700,000 S 38,650,508 S - S 36.650.506 S 9.501,000 25% Reimbursable Costs $ - IS 26.000.000 S 28.00 ,000 1 3 2.t II,500 PROJECT NET $ 121925.000 1 S I50300,000 $ - $ 15d]00.000 $ 38650.506 3 - 3 36.65D.506 1 S 7.391,500 1916 •Funds authorized to dale Includes multiple contracts issued under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District "Funds eulhonieal to date Include Pipeline at Than Lacy Jail,SCE substation censtiuGlon,temporary office facilities.agreement and easements.production of MFIUV vendor design documents,and Owner Controlled Insurance Program •"Funds authorized to data include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27.2002 G'Awp.LtalengrJOBS 8 CONTR NCTSU-36Mudgel tablesur budget table 032702 Board xI51UV award OCSD Confidential UV...to Pop I Agenda Item #3 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: March 11, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: -Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No. 5014030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRESELECTION SUMMARY Two proposals were received on February 27, 2002 to provide ultraviolet light (UV) equipment for the Groundwater Replenishment System. Proposals were received from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies. Four firms including Wedeco- Ideal Horizons and Aquionics had been pre-qualified to provide the equipment. The proposal received from Trojan Technologies had the lowest calculated present worth fife cycle cost. The Trojan Technologies proposal also had the lowest capital cost of the.UV equipment. The proposed capital cost of the UV equipment at $9,749,405 plus tax or $10,439,990.61 including tax at 7.75%, is above the engineer's estimate of $10,250,000 (without the 15% contingency added). Based on the results of the present worth life cycle cost analysis, the recommended pre-selected UV equipment manufacturer is Trojan Technologies. The Trojan bid provides significant ongoing operations and maintenance savings compared to our estimates. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for March 20 OCWD Board meeting and for March 27 OCSD Board meeting. A. Approve Addendums 1 and 2 providing a time extension and technical clarifications. B. Recommend that the Boards of Directors of OCWD and OCSD authorize OCWD to award a pre-selection agreement to Trojan Technologies for the manufacture of ultraviolet light equipment for the Groundwater Replenishment System for the total capital cost of$9,749,405 plus tax as follows: 1.) Authorize payment to Trojan Technologies for engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000. 2.) Assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to a future contract to install the demonstration UV system at a total cost of $849,842, plus tax. - 1 - Agenda Item #3 3.) Assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV system at a total estimated capital cost of$8,649,563, plus tax. BACKGROUND On October 8, 2001 your Committee approved the use of a present worth life cycle cost analysis as the basis for pre-selection of the UV equipment manufacturer. In September, the Board of Directors of the OCSD authorized the award of this contract if at or below the Engineers Estimate of $10,250,000. The criteria used for the determination of the lowest present worth life-cycle cost included the capital cost of a demonstration UV system, capital cost of the permanent UV system, lamp replacement price, lamp life warranty period, and operational costs over a 25-year life. The operational costs included energy costs. An interest rate of 6% was used in the present worth calculation. The amount of energy necessary for operation of each manufacturer's system was to be guaranteed by the manufacturer in their proposal. A value of 6.5 cents per kWh was used for energy cost calculations. In addition, a payment of $250,000, MF system engineering costs, was included in the proposal determined by staff for all bidders. The demonstration UV system has a capacity of 5 mgd and will be installed near the time when the temporary MF system will be constructed. The demonstration UV system will be used to verify the performance of the UV manufacturer's design for NDMA destruction and disinfection efficiency prior to delivery of the full UV system. The Department of Health Services (DHS) requires that installed UV systems show proof of disinfection efficiency prior to the system being put into full operation. Testing the demonstration system allows the design team to have confidence in the UV manufacturer's proposed design and meet DHS requirements. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS The engineer's estimate for the capital cost of the equipment including the demonstration UV system, permanent UV system, $250,000 lump sum for engineering services, and sales tax was $10,250,000. (The original estimate was based on sales tax at 7.5%, it was bid at 7.75%. Depending on State of California finances, the sales tax rate may change before the equipment is delivered and payment is made.) The basis of pre-selection is the lowest present worth life-cycle cost. This type of present worth analysis includes ail capital as well as O&M costs over the 25-year period chosen for the analysis. The Request for Proposal (RFP) and two addenda (attached) were sent to four pre- qualified UV equipment manufacturers. Two proposals were received on February 26, 2002, from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies. The other two pre- qualified manufacturers, Wedeco-Ideal Horizons and Aquionics, did not submit a proposal for this project. The results of the proposals received were as follows: - 2 - Agenda Item #3 ` Table 1 UV Equipment Pre-Selection Proposals Proposal Price Proposal Price Calculated MF Proposed for Capital Cost for Capital Cost Present Manufacturer Lamp type of Equipment' of Equipment`(not including (including sale Worth Life s Cycle Cost sales tax tax 7.75% Trojan Low pressure- $9749,405 $10,439,990.61 $20,253,000 Technologies high intensity Calgon Medium $12 087,235.38 $12,958,650.07 $22,648,000 Carbon Corp. pressure • Includes lump sum cost of$250,000 for special engineering services. The proposal received from Trojan Technologies had the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost. The Trojan Technologies proposal also had the lowest capital cost of the UV equipment. The proposed capital cost of the UV equipment was above the engineer's estimate, $10,250,000, for both proposals (the Trojan proposal was below when tax is not included). Based on the results of the present worth life cycle cost analysis, the pre-selected UV equipment manufacturer should be Trojan Technologies. The UV equipment procurement will involve three separate contracts. The UV equipment procurement will include the following three contracts: 1. Demonstration and permanent UV system engineering (shop drawings/layout preparation/control system design) 2. Demonstration UV system (5 mgd) 3. Permanent UV system (70 mgd which includes the 5 mgd demonstration system) The first contract is between OCWD and Trojan Technologies as the UV equipment manufacturer. The amount of this contract will be limited to $250,000. This contract enables the treatment plant design team to prepare the work required to design the facilities necessary for the selected UV system. The contract for the demonstration UV system will be assigned to the general contractor chosen to install the demonstration UV system at a value of $849,842 plus tax. The contract for the permanent UV system will be assigned to the AWT general contractor at a value of $8,649,563, plus tax. Table 2 summarizes the breakdown of the Trojan Technologies contract- - 3 - Agenda Item #3 Table 2 Breakdown of Trojan Technologies UV Proposal Contract Proposal Price not including sales tax Engineering services $250,000 Demonstration UV system equipment $849,842 Permanent UV system equipment $8,649,563 TOTAL $9,749,405 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE IMPLICATION The December 2000 project cost estimate of $352 million included estimated costs for the UV system power consumption and lamp replacement. The annual power estimate was $14/AF, but based on the Trojan proposal the actual cost would be $7.001AF. This represents a project cost savings of $7.00/AF. Also, the annual lamp replacement cost estimate was $5.00/AF and the Trojan proposal provides a cost of $3.00/AF. This is a savings of$2.00/AF for a total savings of$9.00/AF. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS Discussed from time to time under the Project Development Phase, including July 30 and October 8, 2001. Attachments— RFP Addenda 1 and 2 -4 - ti CALOON CARBON CORPORATION Orange County Water District March 1, 2002 PO Box 8300 Fountain Valley,Ca 92728-8300 Attention: Mehul Patel; Project Manager Re: Calgon Carbon Corporation Proposal Review Dear Mr. Patel, On behalf of Calgon Carbon Corporation,I would like to thank Orange County in advance for the consideration of our technology. I trust that you found our response to the bid package both complete and in full compliance with the specifications. As a point of fact, Calgon Carbon Corporation has taken no exceptions to the bid. We respectfully request that the evaluation committee consider that the system proposed by Calgon Carbon Corporation is consistent with the Calgon Carbon Corporation UV systems currently in use at Orange County. This provides a number of benefits that are not explicitly accounted for in the bid evaluation. These points can be summarized as follows: Proven technology Calgon Carbon Corporation's UV technology for this application has been successfully demonstrated by Orange County. Our proposed system will meet or exceed all treatment objectives and regulatory requirements. By selection of our bid,Orange County will not have to address any potential non-compliance issues. Orange County can select Calgon Carbon Corporation's equipment with the confidence that the technology is proven and reliable. Operator Experience Pursuant to the point above,selection of the Calgon Carbon Corporation System ensures that Orange County is familiar and comfortable with the routine operation of the UV system and no additional expense will be required for the training of operators. Consistency of components Consistency in equipment supply permits Orange County to minimize spare parts purchasing and inventory. Due to increased volume,Calgon Carbon Corporation was able to offer Orange County attractive pricing for the supply of replacement lamps. Should Calgon Carbon Corporation's bid be selected, Orange County would be in the f position to order replacement lamps at the reduced price for all of its systems. The .. difference between the list price of our lamps and this discounted price represents a substantial operating cost savings on the systems currently installed. Specifically, Orange County could realize savings of$1.7 Million on a NPV basis or$134,550 per year. This major operation savings needs to he considered as an added economic benefit of selecting Calgon Carbon Corporation. Outside of the benefits provided to Orange County by selecting a similar system,there are also many other factors that need to be considered in awarding the contract for this project: Financial stability of Respondents This contract considers the life cycle costs of the UV system over twenty years. Certainly the financial stability of the selected vendor needs to be taken in to account when considering the long-term partnership. We strongly urge Orange County to investigate and compare the financial strength and prospects for all bidders. Non-Compliance issues: As previously mentioned,Calgon Carbon Corporation submitted its bid with no exceptions to the bid specification. We would ask the evaluation committee to ensure that all bidders have met these criteria. We would specifically request that the evaluation committee review the following areas in detail: • Vessel desian: The bid documents specify that the reactors have a design { pressure of 100 psig. We can only assume that to comply with the specification, the lamps and the quartz sleeves must be installed in the reactor prior to testing. The Calgon vessel design pressure is in fact 100 psig with the lamps and quarts sleeves installed in the vessel. • PLC controls and Ethernet communication: We have noted that in past bid responses from one of our competitors,their design was based on utilizing a proprietary control card to accomplish equipment level controls. In the case of the Orange County bid,the most likely use of this technology would be to utilize the proprietary control card for floor level control. The system would then simply communicate status and set point information through a serial link back to the SCADA system. This would not meet the specification of requiring brand name PLC controls and Ethernet based communications to VO. • PLC selection: As a point of clarification, Orange County indicated in writing to Calgoh Carbon Corporation that a GE Series 90/70 was a requirement of the bid. We did include the GE Series 90170 in our scope of work. • Harmonic mitigation equipment: Calgon Carbon Corporation had questioned the requirement of the harmonic mitigation equipment. We did receive written confirmation of the requirement. Therefore,the harmonic mitigation equipment along with the dual feed automatic transfer switching, full structure switchgear with draw-out breakers, facilities equipment, power monitoring software and the short circuit study are included in our scope of work. 2 . SCADA System: Calgon Carbon Corporation has included a redundant server option for the GE Cimplicity Open Process SCADA system. . System Integrators: As a supplier of a complete system, which includes all integration, we would call into question our competitions' ability to meet the bid specification with respect to locally based System Integrators. - Design Basis We have designed our system with the capability to perform with a water transmittance at 95%T. Based on initial information provided at the bid opening, we question the ability of the other bidders equipment to meet these criteria. We believe that this issue requires serious attention on the part of Orange County. Installation Costs Calgon Carbon Corporation system is designed to minimize installation costs. By providing a horizontal design in which all components are at floor level, it allows for easy and safe access by operation personnel as no platforms or ladders are necessary for maintenance. Also, by minimizing the number of lamps utilized(120 vs. thousands of lamps) minimal electrical installation is required in the form of terminations,conduit runs,and lamp installation. In summary, the reactor orientation and the reduced ouanber of lamps required by Calgon Carbon Corporation's system, results in substantial installations savings to Orange County. Maintenance Costs Calgon Carbon Corporation system is designed to minimize maintenance costs. By utilizing only 120 lamps(only 50 in operation)vs. thousands of lamps,there is substantially less time spent replacing lamps. In addition,the recommended quarterly inspection and replacement of quartz sleeves becomes extremely labor intensive and costly when considering the amount of installed lamps. To summarize, we hope that you find these additional thoughts on the project helpful, not only in terms of potential future cost avoidance but in selecting the most qualified supplier. Calgon Carbon Corporation is a solid American company that has made significant environmental contributions to California's water issues. We are committed to the community of Orange County and believe, that as an engineering company, our proven NOMA technology will provide the best performance backed by a financially strong company. Best regards, Charles Drewry Regional Sales Manager CC: Bruce Chalmers, Bill Everest, David Murray 3 Groundwater Replenishment System April 9, 2002 Mr. Charles Drewry Calgon Carbon Corporation, Inc. 2890 West Oasis Road Tucson, AZ 85742 Subject: UV Light Equipment Pre-selection Groundwater Replenishment System Dear Mr. Drewry: This letter is written in response to the letter received from Calgon Carbon Corporation, Inc. dated March 1, 2002 requesting the Orange County Water District to consider certain issues pertaining to the pre-selection of the subject equipment. Our responses are grouped in the following categories: • Consistency with current equipment • Technical and economic factors • Financial stability of respondents Consistency with Current Equipment: Your letter infers several benefits related to consistency between the existing and proposed Calgon equipment. However, the Calgon proposed equipment is of different size, orientation and style compared to the Calgon UV tower currently in operation at Water Factory 21. Technical and Economic Factors Your letter states that several factors are not included in the life-cycle cost (LCC) analysis used to select the UV equipment manufacturer. These include: 1) Operator training costs; 2) Replacement lamp discounts; 3) Technical design criteria; 4) Installation costs; 5) Maintenance costs; and 6) American-based company. Each of these items were considered when preparing the pre-selection documents, but did not warrant inclusion in the specific LCC analysis criteria. Operator training costs are a minor expense for either manufacturer. Replacement lamp costs were considered in the LCC analysis; the present worth (PW) of Calgon's lamp replacement costs were lower than Trojan's; however, the total PW cost (used for selection) for Calgon was $2.4 million higher than Trojan's (12% higher), considering all costs for power consumption, lamp replacement and ballast replacement. The technical design criteria issues listed in the letter (and labeled as "non-compliance issues") have been addressed in the Trojan proposal to OCWD's satisfaction. Installation costs, both electrical and structural costs, and maintenance costs are not significantly different between the manufacturers, and therefore were not included in the LCC analysis. Funding for the project from grants and loans are not affected by buying non-American products. A pm,eff n of Oe Omni Ca ,n W.W O .and 0,Omnre Cwnry Sarv�auon Otrvm (714) 378.3200 - Fa. (714) 778J781 - 10500 Elk A.cnue Fnnnnin Valle. Cohlornh 92708 Response to March 1, 2002 Calgon Lefler Page 2 of 2 Financial Stability of Respondents In evaluating the proposals for responsiveness, consideration was given to the financial standing of both Trojan and Calgon. Although Trojan has incurred a net loss during the period 1999-2001, as stated in your letter, Calgon also incurred a net loss ($13,729,000) in 1999, according to the 2000 Annual Report included in your proposal. We also reviewed Trojan's first quarter 2002 report, which indicates the following: 1) small net loss ($0.02 per share); 2) expected second quarter revenue of $22 million; and 3) selection by City of Seattle of Trojan equipment for a 180 mgd drinking water disinfection system (largest in the world). Review of Trojan's second quarter results (period ending February 28, 2002) indicate a strong financial turnaround, based on the following: 1 . Second quarter revenue of$22.7 million (52% increase), an annual equivalent of $91 million; 2. Second quarter net income of $1.1 million ($0.06 per share compared to a $0.05 per share loss last year); 3. Retirement of all short-tens indebtedness; 4. Positive cash flow; and 5. Backlog exceeding $40 million (not including the GWR System project) In addition, Trojan has successfully met the performance bonding requirements delineated in the contract documents. We are satisfied with the financial viability of Trojan to successfully meet the project requirements. Based on the proposal evaluation stated in Article 18 of Section 00200 and in accordance with Section 00310 of the specifications, the recommendation of award will remain Trojan Technologies. Thank you for your time and effort in submitting a proposal for the Groundwater Replenishment System Ultraviolet Disinfection and Oxidation System. Sincerely, William R. Everest, P.E. Associate General Manager Orange County Water District lip 1?0mmenOACv%%GwR 49FFvW DatignNroaviokt R-rbl)1Rnpprtse ro MM 1 Cogm Itr(49-0Z1.0oc cc: Thomas Dawes, OCWD Dave Ludwin, OCSD Clark Ide, OCWD Brad Hogin, OCSD Mehul Patel, OCWD Bruce Chalmers, CDM Wendy Sevenandt, OCSO Dave Murray, Brown and Caldwell Christian Williamson, Trojan Tech. Bob Finn, Brown and Caldwell eon MMI T.EE ON UON WCC COMMITTEE ON wR5F1125,2 pC Iy,505e9 EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE J`^—�' 13021 335�1:59 , SKRrmaF ISOl13155e59 FAX EOVCATIOv gFFORM ❑ o- WpP%FOPCE REOTEUION9 13=97 LEWIS ST r,SUITE 101 SELECT EWCALIOR �E� F. )fir ` tT GAROEN GROVE.CA 22.-0'INS Langres of the ttllitet gtat" S=14,02 COMMITTEE ON g11ME0 SERVICES M.e31.1 FAA nw...9owwuFT 9R m e: +muse of iREpreseutatiues Lam:e.R-..9 MILILARY RE9FAPLFF MIC OEVFI0RAE11i M1LR°HEl 0asllingtmt, r3C 20515-0545 9rtC1nL OVERSIGHT PAHR-VaNEt O OM iEPPOPISM April 18, 2002 Mr. Iry Pickler OCWD Board of Directors Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Pickler: It has recently been brought to my attention that a series of contracts for the Ground Water Replenishment System (GV rM) have/and or will be awarded to international firms headquartered in France and Canada. Based on my records,the GWRS is being funded by federal, state, and local tax dollars. With construction and development costs expected to exceed $350 million dollars, I believe it is in the best interest of our economic health to award future contracts to US firms, especially in light of the recent economic downturn. Although signs of an economic slowdown began to surface in early 2001, September 11 placed an undue burden on our business community,residents, and families. As our economy is now showing signs of recovery,there is no better time than now to put American tax dollars back into the national economy. The potential benefit to national and regional tech companies, suppliers, contractors, and laborers is enormous. Furthermore, the events of the last 8 months have given rise to security concerns regarding our nation's inffasnncture. I firmlybelieve that the construction of any project that directly impacts our entire community should remain under the jurisdiction of US firms. The GWRS clearly meets this criteria—the project will ultimately provide water service for 2.8 million Orange County residents. I respectfully urge that you give this request your highest consideration. If you have further questions or require additional information,please do not hesitate to contact my District Director,Raul Luna, at 714-621-0102. Very truly Youn, CZ Loretta anchez 'V4 Member of Congress S�( Mt ,Re,reo o+ucTnEo r.FEq Agenda Item #8 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: April 22, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 50141030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: N/A From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes, Bill Everest Subject: ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT UPDATE SUMMARY In March 2002, the JCC approved and recommended to the Boards of Directors that Trojan Technologies be selected to provide ultraviolet light (UV) disinfection equipment for the GWR System. Both Boards deferred the item back to staff. The OCSD Board requested that staff address a letter issued by Calgon Carbon Corporation dated March 1, 2002. Staff has addressed the issues in a response letter dated April 8, 2002 to Calgon Carbon Corporation. Staff has not changed their recommendation to select Trojan Technologies as the UV equipment manufacturer for the GWR System. The OCSD Board will act on approving Trojan Technologies as the UV equipment manufacturer at their April 24, 2002 meeting. The action before the Board is to award a $250,000 contract to Trojan Technologies for engineering design documents at this time and assign the purchase of UV equipment to construction contracts. The construction contracts will be brought to the JCC and Boards when the designs are complete and the contracts are ready to bid. DISCUSSIONIANALYSIS In October 2001, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Board of Directors authorized issuance of a Request for Proposals for the pre-selection of ultraviolet light equipment estimated at $10,250,000, and granted authority to the Orange County Water District(OCWD) Board of Directors to award a contract for equipment design in the amount of$250,000, and also granted authority to the OCWD Board of Directors to assign the value of equipment to construction contracts for installation. - 1 - Agenda Item#8 The request for proposals was sent to four firms specializing in ultraviolet (UV) disinfection equipment and two proposals were received. Proposals were received from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies on February 27, 2002. Both were over the engineer's estimate of$10,250,000 when tax is included in the total cost. This item was brought before the OCSD Board of Directors in March because the lowest proposed cost exceeded the engineer's estimate. Trojan Technologies proposes the lowest capital cost of$10,439,990.61 with tax included at 7.75% and the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of $20,253,000. With approval by the Boards of Directors, a contract in the amount of$250,000 will be awarded to Trojan Technologies for engineering design documents. The value of the UV disinfection equipment as proposed by Trojan Technologies will be assigned to the demonstration unit construction contractor and the permanent facilities construction contractor. These contracts are scheduled for bid and award in the summer of 2002 and spring of 2003. These installation contracts will be brought before the Joint Cooperative Committee and the OCSD and OCWD Board of Directors in accordance with the adopted procedures that will be in effect at that time. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS October 8, 2002, March 11, 2002. Attachment -2 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mewing Date To Bd.of Dir. 06/26/02 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Ra171I r vd Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 ADDENDUM NO. 5 TO CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp, Dresser& McKee Inc. for an additional amount of$557,697, for a total amount not to exceed $35,890,804, for a cost-of-living increase of 2.7%for 2002 in accordance with the PSA for the Groundwater Replenishment System,Job No. J-36, with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District paying equal shares of$278,849. SUMMARY • On March 28, 2001, the Board of Directors authorized Addendum No. 3 with Camp, Dresser and McKee Inc. (CDM) for the final design, construction support services, and start-up services for the Groundwater Replenishment System. • The Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with CDM requires a cost-of-living adjustment each year, which is applied to the remaining balance of authorized labor funding each April, based on the January to January adjustment of the local Consumer Price Index (CPI). • Addendum No. 5 is proposed for your consideration to address the annual cost-of-living adjustment in accordance with the contract provisions. • The JCC recommends to the Boards of Directors of both the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) approval of Addendum No. 5 to the PSA with CDM in an amount not to exceed $557,697 for the cost-of-living adjustment. • Addendum No. 5 would increase the CDM team's authorized budget from $35,333,107, to an amount not to exceed $35,890,804. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY A total authorization of$278,849 is being requested as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. The funds are being moved from contingency. ee W:su•, Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2001-02 CIP Budget sec.8,page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) An increase of $278,849 in Consultant Professional Service Agreement (PSA)funds from Contingency is being requested as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. The overall project budget is unchanged. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the May 13, 2002, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors certified the Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001, Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002 and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. May 13, 2002, JCC Agenda Item Submittal re: Addendum No. 5 to PSA with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. WTS:sa G:tnlg1oba1%Agenda Draft ReportsVdnt 8oards1062602add5.CDM.doc Re.. ..o l Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO.J46 F7e O ';G a Ip 4r $ Flow Ceve rent $ 700.000 $ 4.000 $ 4000 i,'� $ 4.000 $ 4.000 $ 4,000 100% "i 55MIaNParmibi 4000000 $ 4.000.000 "I $ 1000000 $ 4,000.000 $ 4,000.000 100% Consultsll PSA• $ 7.500.000 $ 18.400.000 $. 218,849 $ 18.678.849 4 $ 18.158.334 $ 278,049 $ 19437193 3 3,000.000 16% r Oesl nSta9 $ 2.349.000 $ 1.349.000 $ 1.349,000 i,.� $ 1,349,000 $ 1349000 $ 2500.000 185% Construclron Contrac1' $ $6.481.500 $ 137.500.000 $ 137500.000 $ 9.642.655 $ 9.642,655 0% C nsbuceoa Administration"' $ 2.653.900 $ 6.021.000 $ 6.021.111M $ 5.496519 $ 5496,519 0% Construction Inspection $ 9345,600 $ 326.000 $ 326.000 li_ 0% Cantin en $ 12,895000 $ 15100.000 $ 278849 $ 19821.151 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 121,925,000 1 $ 111 $ 182,700,000 ':.' $ 38.650.508 $ 278.849 5 38.929.357 $ 9.504.000 24% Reimbursable Costs $ 28.000.000 IS 28.000.000 L,i I 1 1 $ 2,112,500 PROJECT NET $ 121,925.000 $ 154.700.000 $ 154.700.000 ' $ 38.650,508 $ 278,549; $ 38,929.357 1 $ 7.391,500 19% Funds authar¢ed W date Includes multiple contracts issued under the tarts of the Caopenbrfi Agreement far Pmled Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with Me Orange County Water District "Funds aulharized W date Include Pipeline at Theo Lacy Jail,SCE substation wr .a rucilon.temporary a8ice ladli0es,agreement and easements,production of MFIUV vendor design doci meets,and Owner Controlled Insurance Program. "'Funds authorized to date include Construction Management Services awarded on Febwary 27.2002 G:1wp.diatengUOBS 9 CONTRACTSU-361U1 36 budget table 062602 Board.xlslAdd 5 award Agenda Item #2 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: May 13, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $557,697 From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: ADDENDUM NO. 5 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. SUMMARY On March 28, 2001, the Boards of Directors of the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) approved the final design and construction phase services contract (Addendum No. 3) with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM). The professional services agreement with CDM requires cost-of-living adjustments to the remaining balance of authorized labor funding each April, based on the January-to-January adjustment of the local Consumer Price Index (CPI). Addendum No. 5 is proposed for your consideration to address the annual cost-of-living adjustment in accordance with the contract provisions. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for the June 5 OCWD Board meeting and for the June 26 OCSD Board meeting. Approve and authorize issuance of Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., in accordance with their Professional Services Agreement, a cost-of-living increase of 2.7% for 2002, increasing the authorized amount $557,697, from $35,333,107 to an amount not to exceed $35,890,804. (Costs to be shared equally between OCSD and OCWD.) BACKGROUND Your Joint Cooperative Committee approved the professional services agreement (Addendum No. 3) with CDM for final design and construction phase support services at - 1 - Agenda Item #2 i d' the March 19, 2001 meeting. The Boards of Directors of both the OCWD and OCSD approved the CDM agreement on March 28, 2001. The professional services agreement with CDM requires cost-of-living adjustments to the remaining balance of authorized funding each April, based on the January-to-January adjustment of the Consumer Price Index (CPI). According to the agreement, the annual increase is applied to the actual remaining fees, less other direct costs, as of April 1. The Cola increase for 2002-2003 is 2.7%. DISCUSSION The currently authorized not-to-exceed total CDM contract value is $35,333,107. Of this, $5,039,920 was approved for the Project Development Phase, which was completed in December 2000. During the past year, the CDM team has expended $8,596,058, leaving a remaining balance of authorized funding of$21,697,129 as of April 1, 2002. Of this balance, $1,041,688 budgeted for other direct costs, and $20,655,441 is the labor component impacted by the required cost-of-living adjustment. The cost-of-living increase is calculated based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area published by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). As indicated in the attached BLS table, the January 2002 CPI is 178.9 and the January 2001 CPI is 174.2. This represents an increase of 2.7%. Multiplying this CPI increase, 2.7%, times the remaining balance of labor funds, $20,655,441, yields an annual cost-of-living adjustment of$557,697. Addendum No. 5, in the amount of$557,697, is proposed for your consideration to address the annual cost-of-living adjustment in accordance with the contract provisions. Addendum No. 5 addresses only the annual cost-of-living increase required by the CDM agreement. Not included in this addendum are several changes to the Scope of Work that have been identified over the past few months through the design process. The following issues have necessitated changes to CDM's scope of work. 1. Integrated Information System (formerly called the Transactional System) 2. Alignment Study for GWR Pipeline Unit 3 3. Alignment Study for Southeast Barrier Pipeline 4. Additional surveying for Well No. 1-31 5. Increased hydrogen peroxide storage for removal of 1,4-dioxane PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS March 19, 2001— Approval by JCC for Addendum No. 3 to CDM Professional Services Agreement for final design and construction phase services. - 2 - �. Agenda Item #2 March 28, 2001 — By action of both Boards, Addendum No. 3 to CDM Professional Services Agreement approved. November 14, 2001 — Approval by JCC for Addendum No. 4 to CDM for Professional Services Agreement for changes in the Scope of Work. November 19, 2001 — Addendum No. 4 to CDM Professional Services Agreement approved by OCWD Board. - 3 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS rna•nrg Dare To ad.of Dir. W fV02 _ Number Item eAGENDA REPORT 18 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Mark Esquer, O & M Process Engineering Manager SUBJECT: ESTABLISH CONTRACTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE, SPECIFICATION NO. C-2002-98BD AND SODIUM BISULFITE, SPECIFICATION NO. C-2002-102BD FOR THE OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION PROGRAM. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to competitively bid and subsequently award the purchase of the following chemicals in connection with the ocean outall bacteria reduction program. 1. Sodium Hypochlorite, Specification No. C-2002-98BD, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for an estimated amount of$4,038,000, for the period August 1, 2002 through July 31, 2003, with four one-year renewal options to include not more than a 10% annual cost escalation, if necessary. 2. Sodium Bisulfde, Specification No. C-2002-10213D, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for an estimated amount of$800,000, for the period August 1, 2002 through July 31, 2003, with four one-year renewal options to include not more than a 10% annual cost escalation, if necessary. SUMMARY • The proposed short-tens ocean outall bacteria reduction project utilizes sodium hypochlorite solution (bleach)for disinfection and sodium bisulfite for de-chlorination. The new facilities would be used for a 3 to 5-year period or until a long-term alternative is implemented. • The goal of the bacteria reduction program is to reduce bacteria levels at the end of the pipeline in the zone of initial dilution. • A bleach system alternative is expected to be fully operational by August 2002. • The chemical addition facilities would be operated to meet all applicable California Ocean Plan requirements for water quality protection including chlorine residual, toxicity, and disinfection byproducts. This goal would ultimately be achieved when a long-term ocean ouffall bacteria reduction project is implemented. • Staff is recommending the Board to pre-approve the procurement of disinfection related chemicals in order to meet the tight deadlines. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed disinfection chemicals will be purchased and used only during the upcoming, 2002-03 fiscal year. A budget line item to purchase the chemicals has been included as part of the proposed 2002-03 fiscal year budget. There is no impact on the fiscal year 2001-02 budget. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (FY 2002-03 Budget JO Line item 67A and 67B) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. _. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES Do not pre-authorize the General Manager to bid and award the contract to purchase the disinfection chemical. This will delay the chemical procurement would subsequently delay the implementation of the short-term bacteria reduction project. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS SB:ct G1wpAe \8201basraffi=d Item UslnlecUon-Hypochlodte Ri.doc Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Dale To. era. 6/26J@ AGENDA REPORT tram Number Item Number 19 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Mark Esquer, Process Engineering SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF NATURAL GAS, SPECIFICATION NO. C-2002-101BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Authorize the General Manager to solicit proposals, negotiate, and award a new contract for the Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. C-2002-101 BD, to be effective August 1, 2002 for an estimated annual amount of$1,809,000; and, (2) Authorize the General Manager, or his designee, to negotiate fixed prices under the Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. C-2002-101 BD contract, if market conditions are favorable, without further Board authorization. SUMMARY • The volatile nature of the natural gas market requires quick negotiations and agreements between buyer and sellers. To permit staff to negotiate a new contract the General Manager needs the authority from the Board to immediately act on staff recommendations regarding contract negotiations. By having this ability, staff will be able to obtain the best price for gas. • To permit staff to negotiate opportunities for fixing pricing for limited periods during the new contract's duration; the Director of Finance needs the authority from the Board to immediately act on staffs recommendations. By having this ability, staff will have the opportunity to lock in fixed prices if the market conditions allow. Staff has experience in procuring this commodity and a good history of savings. • The natural gas markets have seen an unprecedented increase in unit prices starting in the spring of 2000. The average market price for gas at the California border has experienced price spikes as high as 530% over the traditional price. The prices are currently 160% higher than the historical prices. Because the market has become very volatile, the risks to the gas marketers who buy and sell on a continuous basis have increased. The marketers can now only make offers that are valid for a few minutes to a few hours, requiring quick actions by customers to negotiate contracts and take advantage of market opportunities for fixed pricing. • The current gas procurement contract expires on July 31, 2002 and staff will be issuing a Request for Proposals for a new contract and selecting the best offer in a process that uses faxed offers and acceptances over a period less than an hour. This process was successfully used last year for the natural gas contract award. G 1,dlaL,MMB.M A,nd.RePwI VM B.W A,p I RIIIW80 ftl 11121211111,10 • Additional discussion of the gas market and the District's plans for minimizing costs , and risks is provided in the Additional Information section of this Item. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The-budget for this item is being proposed under the Fiscal year 2002103 District Operating budget. Once the Board takes action on said document; the purchase of natural gas for next fiscal year will be funded. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 128) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Natural gas is primarily used in the Central Generation facilities at both plants to produce the electricity needed for the wastewater treatment facilities. The gas is obtained through a contract with a natural gas marketer who procures the gas and arranges for its transportation to the California border. The Southern California Gas Company transports the gas from the border to our plants. The natural gas markets have seen an unprecedented increase in unit prices starting in the Spring of 2000. The average market price for gas at the California border has experienced price spikes as high as 640% over the historical price. The District historically paid about$2.50 per unit of gas purchased. Current futures prices are over $4.00 per unit which is made up of the cost of the gas itself, the cost of transportation and the marketer's markup (premium). Because the market has become very volatile, the risk to the gas marketers who buy and sell on a continuous basis has increased and the number of marketers in the California market has shrunk from over a dozen to just three. Due to the increased risk and reduced competition, the premium charged above the market price in the last nine months has ranged from $0.50 to $1.00 per unit of natural gas. Under the existing contract the premium is fixed at $0.05 per unit. This premium is paid to marketers for handling the management, administration, and risk associated with procuring and transporting natural gas to the California border As a result of the market volatility, marketers cannot guarantee price offers for more than a few minutes. With the flexibility to act quickly in order to take advantage of market opportunities, staff can secure exceptionally good prices. The contract with our existing gas provider, BP Energy Company, expires on July 31, 2002. The contract allows a negotiated renewal but BP is not offering acceptable terms for renewal. Staff will issue a Request for Proposals to select a new marketer for the next year. G:1rq.EiaNperga,BmEA R VC B OAgm Aepy¢N 1O 19 UXKR-101WErc After an evaluation of written proposals, selected proposers will fax their bids to the District at a prescribed day and time; the District will review the bids and make an award within 45 minutes. The use of this procedure will require delegation of the Board's approval authority to staff. Staff requests the authority to negotiate and sign a contract before August 1, 2002 and to lock-in future prices during the duration of the new contract, if attractive. ALTERNATIVES 1. Bid the contact in the normal manner and select the successful bidder based on their estimated pricing. The bidder will dictate the price when the contract is signed and the District will lose the control and leverage that a quickly executed negotiation will provide. CEQA FINDINGS None Required ATTACHMENTS None G1ry.EleMg�4 RepotsQ=B WR9 .ReWM15105Ul 19.L2 2101BD, r 4 a BOARD OF DIRECTORS MmUng Date Ta ad.of Dir. 61 6102 AGENDA REPORT Item Number I[em20M zo Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Morris Ying, Project Manager SUBJECT: AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-35-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve plans and specifications for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and Recommendation; and (4)Award a Construction Contract to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc.,for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Jab No. J-35-2, for an amount not to exceed $14,066,442. SUMMARY • This project will remedy the NFPA 820 (Standard for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities 1999 Edition)deficiencies identified in the 1999 Hazardous Area Classification Study completed by Consultant Brown and Caldwell. • The Area Classification Study of both plants has provided the Orange County Sanitation District with a uniform documentation system showing potential fire and explosion hazards locations throughout the plants. The Area Classification Study Implementation Plan will correct many conditions identified from the previous Area Classification study that had met code requirements at the time of construction, but are now in violation of today's code requirements. This project brings all facilities into compliance with latest OSHA code as well as NFPA 820 standard. • The plans and specifications were completed by Parsons Engineering Science in February 2002. Sealed bids were received on May 21, 2002. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget $29,345,000 Construction Budget $18,242,000 Engineers Estimate $17,000,000 Low Responsive Bid $14,066,442 High Bid $19,096,000 Number of Bids 3 • Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff have completed a review of the three bids submitted on May 21, 2002, and found them to be complete, responsive, and competitive. Page 1 • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction to the lowest bidder, J. F. Shea Construction, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $14,066,442 and authorization of funds for construction administration and inspection. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$14,066,442 for the construction contract is being requested. Authorization of$1,318,000 for construction administration and support is also being requested. Both requests are within the existing budget limits. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8 —Page 140) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The District's action plan to comply with NFPA 820, Standard for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities, resulted in the release of the initial Area Classification Study for both Plants. The study for Area Classification Study for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 was completed in August 1999 by consultant Brown and Caldwell. In the report, it provided the basis of an implementation plan to make corrective actions of modifying existing facilities to meet NFPA 820 requirements. In May 2000, the District issued a Professional Service Agreement (PSA)to Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for the final design of Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos.1 and 2. Addendum No. 1, which was approved In October 2000, increased the contract amount by $24,900 for a total PSA amount of$2,280,580. This additional work involved the evaluation of the Area Hazard Classification Study for the Cyclus Enviro Systems pilot digester located near Digester No. 8 in Plant No. 1. Addendum No. 2, which was approved in January 2001, increased the contract amount by$24, 900, for a total PSA of$ 2,305,480. This additional work involved the addition of Plant No. 2, Utility PLC. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives to the mandated Area Classification Studies and Implementation Plan are available. This project is necessary to ensure compliance with OSHA safety requirements as defined by the National Electrical Code. Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt from CEQA. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Bid Summary MY:sa:jo G;I IglobalNganda Dm6 RepoftJolnl Bo rdsV-35.2 Aft-062602.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Area Classification Study and Implementation Plan JOB NO. J-35-2 r;. 1 Q,9�Dd'' t'SSEbA. i A** PFfb7I�CFr w b E0 P12 '� 1W I� L Ear r 's 'A1j �r All1'N� TIOJILi TT'A�li FJCI�E$1dlTlj -WOE "RV, d; hbtiOt:Y � ET� �ITi�ftABE`' f BIT l' E'TI if 1DAT NE� EBT tAYEfHb�titdTlON TO DATE TC`DATEI%) Pro ad Development $ 131,911 $ 106,000 $ 106,000 ;'. $ 106,000 $ 106,000 $ 79.443 75% Studies/PeTritfing $ 920,876 $ 682000 $ 682000 $ 682.000 $ 682000 $ 662589 97% Consultant PSA $ 2,825000 $ 3,107000 $ 3,107.000 $ 2,305480 $ 2,305,480 $ 2,290508 99% Design Staff $ 529,000 $ 638,000 $ 638,000 $ 638,000 $ 638,000 $ 352,838 55% Construction Contract $ 17,242,000 $ 18,242,000 $ 18,242,000 $ 14,066,442 $ 14,066,442 Construction Adminlstration $ 658000 $ 656,000 $ 656,000 $ 656,000 $ 656.000 Construction Inspection $ 662,000 $ 662.000 $ 662,000 $ 662,000 $ 662,000 Condngency $ 4,952,000 $ 5,252,000 $ 5,252,000 PROJECT TOTAL $ 27,918,787 $ 29,345,000 $ 29,345.000 $ 3.731.480 $ 15,384.442 $ 19,115,922 $ 3,385,378 18% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 27,918,787 1 $ 29,345,000 1 1 $ 29.345,000 11 $ 3,731,480 1 $ 15,384,442 $ 19,115,922 1 $ 3,385,378 18% oA a.malenev0es a CONTRACTsvosryJas2 eudaer mramadon Table 2W20522.a191D1eldcle n May 21, 2002 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA NOS. 1, 2, & 3 BID TABULATION AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 JOB NO. J-35-2 Engineer's Estimate: $17,000,000 Construction Contract Budget: $17,000,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. J. F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 14,066,442 2. OM CONSTRUCTORS JV $ 16.096,000 3. AMELCO ELECTRIC SF, INC. $ 19,400,000 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to J. F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. in the bid amount of$14,066, 442 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering C:1FileNeWIPU-75.2 Bid Tab.dm Rewsed 05119198 OCSD • P.O.Boa 8127 • Foundin Valley,CA 9228-8127 • (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, PLANT NOS. 1 2 JOB NO. J-35-2 J.F.SHEA CONSTRUCTION.INC. OM CONSTRUCTORS JV AMELCO ELECTRIC S.F.INC. Item App—.Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 L ump $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ $ $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 2 1 $ 13,721,142.00 $ 13,721,142.00 $ 15,809,800.00 $ 15,809,800.00 $ 18,921,800.00 $ 16,921,800.00 3 1 $ 250.000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 3a. 8 $ 2,500.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 36.000.00 $ 8.500.00 $ 51,000.00 3b.Construction Scheduling Payment Schedule a. 1 Lump Sum $ 1,200.00 $ 1.200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1.200.00 $ 1,200.00 b, 1 Lum Sum $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10.000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 c. 34 Each $ 1,000.00 $ 34,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 34.000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 34,000.00 d. 12 Each $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00 e. 1 Lump Sum $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00 Subtotal Item 3b. $ 52,200.00 $ 52.200.00 $ 52,200.00 4a. 1 Lump Sum $ 28,000.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75.000.00 �SuiltbtAC!l„ !i!!j 411i ;IPMH: $ 14;OeB,442100 $ 18,168,000.00, $ 19,400,000.00 -Add(+)or Delete(-) $ - $ (92,000.00) $ - To(a1! 14,066,442,00 $. ..18,006,000.00. $ 19,400,000.00 J.F.SHEA CONSTRUCTION,INC. CM CONSTRUCTORS JV AMELCO ELECTRIC S.F.INC. K: p.dlaWngif ul6ie o«.v-35-2 Sid S„mm.n 2Ad 1 of 1 5121102 ,,. BOARD OF DIRECTORS meeting Date To sa.or Dir. 612s/w AGENDA REPORT Item NumberItem Numbe n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Larry Rein, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OFAIRBASE TRUNK SEWER—ARLINGTON CONTRACT NO. 6-13-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve plans and specifications for Abandonment of Alrbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1, to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and Recommendation; and, (4)Award a construction contract to Mike Pi lich & Sons, Inc. for Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Arlington, Contract No. 6-13-2, for an amount not to exceed $596,370. SUMMARY • This project will abandon portions of the Airbase Trunk Sewers, two of the oldest Orange County Sanitation District (District) sewers in Costa Mesa. The sewers were constructed in the 1940s and are deteriorated to a condition where they cannot be maintained. These sewers are no longer needed as trunk sewers since the construction of the Fairview Trunk Sewer and the Gisler-Baker Trunk Sewers. • In addition to the abandonment work, portions of the existing sewer will be reconstructed as a local sewer for serving Orange County Fair Grounds, Costa Mesa High School and Davis Elementary School. The reconstructed sewer will be transferred to Costa Mesa Sanitary District. • This project and two other sections of the Airbase Trunk Sewer are currently budgeted under Abandonment of Airbase Trunk, Watson and California Sewer, Contract No. 6-13. Separate budgets for each project are proposed for the 2002-2003 budget year. The Construction budget for Contract No. 6-13 Is to be eliminated. • The plans and specifications were completed by Boyle Engineering in May 2002. • One Addendum was issued during the bid period that made miscellaneous clarification and modifications. Sealed bids were received on June 4, 2002. Summary information on the 6-13 budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget $2,634,000 Construction Budget $1,665.000 Engineer's Estimate $ 850,000 Low Responsive Bid $ 596,370 High Bid $ 795,000 Number of Bids 7 Page 1 The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc.for an amount not to exceed $596,370. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$596,370 for the construction contract and $159,000 for construction administration and inspection is being requested. The authorization is within the project's budget for FY2001/02. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT The item is budgeted as part of Abandonment of Airbase Trunk, Watson and California Sewers, Contract No. 6-13, and within the budget. For fiscal year 2002/2003, a separate budget will be established as Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer- Arlington, Contact No. 6-13-2. ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item FY2001/02, Section 8, Page 32: Capital Improvement Program, Collections Facilities,Abandonment of Airbase Trunk,Watson and California Sewers) ❑ This Item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract No. 6-13 is to be split into three Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). There are three separate segments of the Airbase Trunk Sewers that are being abandoned along with three separate means of constructing replacement sewers to provide local service once the sewers are abandoned. Since each of these segments has separate timing considerations, the project is being divided into three capital budgets (Contract Nos. 6-13-1, 6-13-2, and 6-13-3)for construction purposes, the design work has been done under Contract No. 6-13. Construction for this project, 6-13-2, will be initially funded under the 6-13 budget until the new budget is established for FY2002/03. The Airbase Trunk Sewers were constructed in the 1940s to serve the arbase that is now the Orange County Fairgrounds and the surrounding area. The Airbase Trunk Sewers have deteriorated and can no longer be economically maintained. The Fairview Drive Trunk Sewer and the Baker-Gisler Interceptor Sewer, constructed in the early 1990s, now serve the area and it is feasible to abandon the Airbase Trunk Sewers. Contract No. 6-13 will abandon the Airbase Trunk Sewers. This portion of the Airbase Trunk Sewers work is important to complete this summer because of coordination with the schools and city. The work is partially on the campus of Costa Mesa High School, which will not have summer school this year. Next year, the school will have summer school. The work is also partially on Arlington Drive, which will be re-paved after this year by the City of Costa Mesa. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives were considered. Page 2 a i l CEQA FINDINGS This project is covered in the previously approved 1989 Master Plan/EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989 and the Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation 3. Bid Summary LR:sa G:MtglobaMgenda Draft RepoftUdnt Boards\673.2 AR G2"2.dx Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK; WATSON AND CALIFORNIA SEWERS CONTRACT NO. 6-13 "..;-ORIGINAL, CURRENT ,PROPOSED. 'PROPOSED. FUNDS THIS , ,-. PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlrASK Lq.• °AUTHORIZED PROJECT "BUDGET y REVIS O , i 'AUTHORIZEb AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENOtD BUD-SET , BUOGET' ' INCREASE : : BUDGET '. ;TO DATE REQUESS' AUTHORWITION :TOOATE TO DATE(%). Pro ct Development $ 2,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 100% Studies/Permitting I $ 7,000 $ 26,263 $26,262.85 $ 26,263 $ 26,263 $ 26,263 100% Consultant PSA $ 94.000 $ 148,000 $ 148,000 $ 131,787 $ 131,787 $ 70,271 53% Design Staff $ 84,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120.000 $ 97,570 81% Construction Contract $ 1,260,000 $ 1,665,000 $ 1.665,000 $ 596.370 $ 598,370 0% 0% Construction Administration $ 185.000 $ 177.000 $ 177,000 $ 72.000 $ 72,000 0% Construction Ins ection $ 159,000 $ 193,000 $ 193.000 $ 87,000 $ 87,000 1 0% Contin en $ 385,000 $ 303,737 $ 303,737 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 2,176,000 $ 2,634,000 $ - $ 2,634,000 $ 279,050 $26,263 $1,034,420 $ 195,104 1 19% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 2,176,000 1 $ 2,634,000 1 $ - $ 2.634,000 1 1 $ 279,050 $26,263 $ 1,034,420 1$ 195.104 19% G:Mpdtekngk72a inWl3Ai "TrunkSe mWSA Addsndum-ARSWlirgtw Amrdj dget Te1,lefi-13 m6-14-02.tlslDlsW0s June 5, 2002 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NO.: 1 BID TABULATION Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer- Arlington Contract No. 6-13-2 Engineer's Estimate: $850,000 Construction Contract Budget: $850,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. MIKE PRLICH & SONS, INC. $ 596,370.00 2. MATTHEW AND STEWART CO., INC. $ 685,393.81 3. STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. $ -764,190.00 4. PAULUS ENGINEERING, INC. $ 784,896.00 5. VALVERDE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 787,554.00 6. KEN THOMPSON, INC. $ 795,000.00 7. ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. $ 822,419.00 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to MIKE PRLICH & SONS, INC. in the bid amount of$596,370 as the lowest and best bid. 'Corrected amount. Steve Bubalo Construction Co. incorrect total was $765,000. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering CARIeNeWIP1&13.2 Bid Tab.doc Revised 05119M OCSD • P.O.BOX 8127 . Fountain Valley.CA 9272&8127 • (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWER-ARLINGTON MIKE PRUCH&SONS.INC. MATTHEW AND STEWART CO..INC. 'STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO Ile. Approx.Cry Unit Total Unit Tatel Unil Total No. Price Price Paco Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum S W.000.00 S 50,000.00 S W.00(m S SOM.00 S 50,000.00 S 50,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 9,000.00 S 8,060.00 S 7,500.00 S 7.500.00 $ 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 3 200 Cubic Yams E 22.00 S 4,400.110 $ 22.00 $ 4,4010.00 $ 22.00 S 4,400.00 4 200 Cubic Yards $ 22.00 S 4,400.110 If 22.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 22.00 $ 4,40DA0 5 1,M2 Unear Feet $ 120.00 $ 163,440.00 $ 145.00 $ 197,490.00 $ 260.00 $ 35/,120.00 6 476 Linear Feel $ 150.00 $ 71,400.00 It 181.00 $ 86,1%W $ 270.08 $ 128,520,00 7 95 Vertical Fast It 400.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 284.00 $ 27,930.00 $ W0.00 $ 76,000.00 8 2,165 Linear Feel $ 70.00 $ 151.M(1.00 $ 82.10 S 177,746.50 If 70.M $ 151,550.00 9 26 Each E 500.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 505.00 $ 13,130.0e S W0.00 1 $ 13,0ill 10 3 Each S 19,000.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 9.744.0()1$ 29,232.00 $ 8,000.1:10 $ 24,000.00 11 11 1 Each S 1,500.00 If 16,500.00 E 1,885.00 $ 20.735.W $ 2,000.00 $ 22.000.00 12 2,960 Unear Feel S 8.00 $ 23,680.00 $ 16,30 S 48,248.00 S 10.00 S 29.600.00 346Ytifll i[ili0 iilii: 'iiii is rii:j ?tpa $ 601.370.00 It 666,967.50 $ 870,090.00 'Add(-)or Delete I.) $ (5,000.00I S 18,426.31 1 (105,900A0) S '596,370.00 $ 665,393.81 $ 764,100.00 MIKE PRUCH&SONS.INC. MATTHEW AND STEWART CO..INC. 'STEVE SUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO 'Corrected amount. Steve But alo Construction Co.Incorrect total was$765,000. PAULUS ENGINEERING VALVERDE CONSTRUCTION.INC. KEN THOMPSON.INC. Item Approx.Gly Unit Total Unit Total Unit Totel No. Price Pace Price Price Pace Pace 1 1 Lump Sum $ W.000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50.1100A0 $ 50.000.00 S 50,0woo $ 50.000.00 2 1 Lump Sum S 89.000.00 $ 89.000.00 $ 6.400.00 It 6.400.00 $ 11 T48.00 S 11.248,00 3 200 Cubic Yand,. $ 22.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 22.00 $ 9,400.00 $ 22.00 $ 4.4001 4 200 Cubic Yards $ 22.00 E 4,400.00 $ 22.00 3 4,400.00 $ 22.00 E 4,400.00 5 1,3112 Umna Feat E 205.00 $ 279,210.00 $ 155.00 It 211,110.00 E 216.00 $ 296.916.00 6 476 tMear Feet E 206.00 $ 98,056.00 It 184. 0 $ 87,584.00 S liS&OD $ 121,11M.00 7 95 Vertical Fee $ 400.00 E 38,000.00 $ 480.00 S 45,600.00 $ 354.00 $ 33.630.00 8 2.165 Unear Feet S 74.00 S ISO210.00 S 132.00 S 285.780.00 $ 99.00 $ 214,335.00 9 26 Each S 460.00 S II.M.W $ 490.00 1$ 12.740.00 1 $ 152.601 E 3,965.00 10 3 Each $ 5.000.00 S 15.OW..00 S 5,900.00 $ 17,700.00 1 $ 5,940.00 E 17.520.00 11 11 Each $ 1,200.00 S 13,200.00 $ 3,200.00 $ W.200.W $ 1,150.00 $ 12,65D.00 12 2,960 Unear Feet $ 7.25 $ 21.460.00 $ 9.00 S 26,640.00 $ iom S 31,080.00 p $ 7114.896.00 E T8T,554.00 E 802,000.00 'Pdd N)or Oelel6(-) $ $ 17.000.001 ?"'a98.00 If ]8].554.00 is Tes.000.00 PAULUS ENGINEERING VALVERDE CONSTRUCTION.INC. KEN THOMPSON.INC. 1 of 6/5102 BID SUMMARY ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWER-ARLINGTON ALSEST IN.DAMES.INC. Hero Ap .Dry Uot Tolel No. Prke Prlae 1 1 Lump Sum S W.M.W f SD,DD0.00 2 1 Lm Sum S 5,3W.00 s 5.3W.m 3 2W Cu Y $ 22.m f 4AOD.D0 4 2W Curie Yer0e $ 22.W s 4,4D0.00 5 1,382 U.FW $ 202.W S 275,124.W 6 476 Unw Feel f 215.W S 102,340.W 7 95 Varkel Fea f 590.m f 56.wlw 8 2.165 Unw Fat f 75.00 f 162,375.m 9 28 Eetl1 s 1,4W.m f 36,4W.W 10 3 EecA f 16.DW.W S 48.m.W 11 11 E, 5 3.550.m $ 39.M.W t2 2,880 Umer Feel E am s 23,6W.W slal',I jig ; i, all f-i:;:807,11 'AtlE(�7 or Delele p) f 15,3W.W tdGlAigdidlNb7;tlldlL!illl!U.. Lil!'i! f..n_'5f22,419.D0 AU6E TIN.DAVIES.INC. c,.y amnpuxac,ne-,weaaet,v+sw.enVem s,mnury x coure�in.a-��xmisnaeo 2 012 6/5/02 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I To ad.or Dlr. 6/ze/o2 AGENDA REPORT trem Number tram Number _ zz Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: ADDENDUM NO. 5 TO THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR ENGINEERING TRAILER COMPLEX AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-90 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Addendum No. 5 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, prepared by K.P. Lindstrom, Inc., for the Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1, Jab No. J-90. SUMMARY • The Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-90, was not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) and needs subsequent documentation according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). • Pursuant to CEQA, an Addendum is the appropriate document. According to CEQA, no public circulation or review period is required for an Addendum prepared for a previously circulated and certified Final Environmental Impact Report. The Orange County Sanitation District's (District) 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR was previously circulated for a 45-day public review period; June 29, 1999 through August 16, 1999. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No budgetary action is being requested at this time. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Budget approved for Job No. J-90 on April 24,2002) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. has prepared this Addendum No. 5 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report in accordance with the CEQA guidelines. The Addendum is as follows: Addendum No. 5 for the Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-90: The Addendum has been prepared to address the construction of temporary trailers located at the northeast comer of Ward Street and Garfield Street. The construction activities associated with this project would be similar to those described in PEIR. No new significant environmental effects have been identified that would require major revisions or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts or mitigation measures adopted by the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). ALTERNATIVES None. In the event, the Addendum for this project is not filed in the District's office prior to the beginning of construction and/or bidding, the District would not be in compliance with CEQA. CEQA FINDINGS The 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR was certified by the District Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. Addendum No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR and the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Environmental Impact ReporUEnvironmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)was filed with the State Clearinghouse on March 28, 2001. Addenda Nos. 2, 3, and 4 were filed on December 19, 2001. ATTACHMENTS Addendum No. 5 to the Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-90 SP:sa WeadtdataiNtglobaMgenda Draft RepodsUoint BwrdsU.90 AR 062602.dm GIn dtaragenda&szrd Agenda Rvdv,S 002 Board Agenda Fepva,06o2dtem22 rWade Revised: Baum, Page 2 a ADDENDUM NO. 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ENGINEERING TRAILER COMPLEX AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. J-90 JUNE 2002 MD S"Wlil PlanftM.EIR Ad&W..Nw 5 K.P.LiM.tr I., TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Orange County Sanitation District 1999 Strategic Plan 3 Project Description- Engineering Trailer Complex Overview 3 Alternatives Considered 6 Analysis of Potential Environmental impacts Associated with Project Modifications 6 CEQA Compliance 10 References Figure 1 Project Location Map Figure 2 Project Site Layout Map Attachment A- Project Site Photographs MW$ Mlic PYn Pmpem EIR SEC =No.5 K.P.Linda hr 1 ,e INTRODUCTION This document has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Section 15164 as an Addendum to the Final Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR)for the Orange County Sanitation District(District) 1999 Strategic Plan certified in October 1999. The purpose of the Addendum is to address changes in the location of Construction Management and Engineering Design personnel and the addition of a newly formed Program Management Office (PMO)Division that will support the implementation of the Strategic Plan facilities approved in 1999, The PEIR assessed potential impacts of the Strategic Plan through the year 2020,including treatment system upgrades and new facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The PEIR also included the demolition and replacement of old facilities,and construction of new facilities that include changes in the location to accommodate efficient operations.The PEIR did not identify specifically in the description of activities of the program,the location of support facilities to house personnel involved in design and construction of the facilities. Such facilities are addressed in the Reclamation Plant No. 1 Specific Plan approved initially in 1993 and updated periodically with the concurrence and project specific concurrence for specific conditions by the City of Fountain Valley. The 1999 Strategic Plan outlined on-site treatment facility layouts through the year 2020 which have subsequently been examined in more detail as design of certain facilities has been initiated. Most recently,the construction of the trickling filters and new primary clarifiers will necessitate demolition of the existing construction management trailers to allow installation of underground _ utilities for the new facilities. Additionally,remodeling of the Administration Building will require relocating other Engineering Department personnel,now housed in the Administration Building and trailers behind the Human Resources Building. Both the trailer facilities personnel (Construction Management trailers and Design Engineering trailers)are being moved to a new site formerly used as a storage facility new the comer of Garfield Avenue and Ward Street.(Figures 1 and 2).This site is owned by the District. The proposed trailer complex will be temporary in nature(4-5 years)and share the site with trailers that will house the previously approved support facilities for the Groundwater Replenishment System(GWRS)Project. This Addendum describes the modifications to the land use for the site and assesses whether the trailer complex would pose additional environmental impacts or require mitigation measures that were not already addressed in the PEIR for the Reclamation Plant No. 1 site. OfSD am¢gia Plan Pa am EIR Addendum N 5 KP.Lindannm I., 2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1"9 STRATEGIC PLAN The 1999 Strategic Plan PEBt identifies the District's Capital Improvement Programs(CIP) proposed to meet future demand for wastewater collection,treatment and disposal facilities -through 2020. Projects are proposed to replace and rehabilitate sewer collection systems,expand and upgrade the District's two wastewater treatment plants,provide adequate discharge capacity for projected peak flows,provide additional treated wastewater to the Orange County Water District(OCWD)for expanded water reuse,and study the feasibility of other improvements. The objectives of the 1999 Strategic Plan are: 1) To plan for the wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal facilities to serve the needs of the District's service area through 2020; 2) To insure compliance with existing and anticipated ocean discharged permit conditions, including the requirements of the 301(h)modified(secondary treatment waiver)National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit for the discharge; 3) To recommend projects that meet the communities needs,protect public health,are technically feasible,and are cost effective and environmentally responsible;and 4) To maximize the use of treated effluent for water recycling. PROJECT DESCRIPTION-ENGINEERING TRAILER COMPLEX OVERVIEW The 1999 Strategic Plan outlined the need to undertake a large number of treatment plant improvements at Reclamation Plant No. 1. These included treatment facilities for primary and secondary treatment,solids treatment utilities' improvement,and the needed support facilities to provide for treatment plant operations and administration. To implement this approved program of treatment plant improvements,the Engineering Department will form a Project Management Office(PMO)Division and retain a Program Management Consultant(PMC)within eight months to help manage the implementation of the CIP.Currently,there is no available office space for the PMC staff. In addition,the District's Construction Management staff will need a new office facility due to the construction of Trickling Filter Rehabilitation and New Clarifiers(Job No.Pl- 76)which places utilities through the existing Construction Management trailer complex. To support these facilities,a replacementkonstruction support trailer complex is being built.The complex will also temporarily house other engineering staff while the Administration Building is being remodeled(under a separate project). OCSD S.akP ftp mt Atla! .No.S KP.Lmdvbom,lu 3 The Engineering Trailer Complex project will provide the following: _• Twelve new double-wide modular trailers, including approximately 46 offices, 24 cubicles, two printer/Xerox areas, three conference rooms, storage/filing areas, restrooms, a deck, and two handicap access ramps. • All required trenching, piping (for water and sewer), wiring, and associated utility work to provide a complete office facility including furniture. • Designated parking for 87 parking stalls 4 handicap accessible parking stalls,4 electric vehicle parking stalls and a bicycle rack for 20 bicycles. The trailer complex will be constructed on a vacant lot new the comer of Garfield Avenue and Ward Street on the District property. This project will accommodate the Construction Management staff,Design Engineering staff,and PMC staff that include Engineers,Project Managers,Inspectors,and the support staff. By locating all the staff in one area,efficiency and collaboration will be improved. The trailer complex consists of 24 total(I2doublewide)trailers divided into 2 units of 12 trailers each.A deck will separate the units. Each unit will consist of 2- 14'x 60'trailers and 10- 12'x 60,trailers. The entire hailer complex including the deck will measure 134'X 148'(0.45 acres). Each unit measures 60'x 148'and an adjoining deck that measures 14'x 148'will separate the two units. Handicap access ramps,American Disability Act(ADA)bathrooms,exits,fire alarms,fire sprinklers will be provided per the City of Fountain Valley's requirement. Water for fire and domestic water service will be supplied from the existing 8-inch City water main running north through the site from Garfield Avenue.Water services will conform to the City of Fountain Valley standards for new connections of potable water.The trailers will tie into a newly constructed 6-inch lateral that will be extended to a new 30-inch diameter manhole to be constructed in Ward Street, which will tie into the City of Fountain Valley sanitary collection system.Ail on-site sewer will be reconstructed in accordance with the City of Fountain Valley standards. Electrical and data/communication connection will be made at the District's 12KV Power Building. The total site,including the trailer complex and proposed access and parking,totals 89,550 sq.11 (2.05 acres). Area for the trailer and parking(85 parking stalls,4 electric recharge stalls,and 4 handicap stalls) totals 70,000 sq.It(1.60 acres). OCSD Smkgic Phn Pm mEIRA M=No.5 xP.Lmaseom Ira 4 The site will be accessed via motor vehicles off of Garfield Avenue using an entrance planned for the GWRS trailer complex. Two entrances from Garfield Avenue are available for accessing the site. One is a shared entrance with the OCWD for their temporary trailer complex located at the _southeast comer of the site. The other site entrance is an existing slide gate located along Garfield Avenue at the midpoint of the southern property line. Both access gates will be open during the working hours of the site. The trailers being acquired are typically set at an elevation 3 feet above finished surface.The height of the trailer structure is approximately 13.5 feet. Air conditioning units will be roof mounted. The overall height of the complex from the finished surface may be up to 20.5 feet. The PEIR(Section 3)identified and analyzed all of the potential impacts associated with the construction of new treatment plant facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The PEIR discussed the construction activities associated with new facilities including noise and visual impacts and identified mitigation measures to minimum the short-term impacts associated with construction and longer-tens operational impacts. The PEER details the need to schedule and plan construction activities in a manner that would create the least amount of traffic disturbance around the Plant No. 1 site because of existing commute hour congestion problems. The construction of the trailer project will not increase the number of employee-related trips and will involve minimal construction and trailing into the site of the modular trailers with minimal(a few days)to complete the delivery. The site modifications associated with the project as described below do not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. Project Site Modifications The two existing temporary Engineering trailers(Construction Management trailers and Design Engineering trailers)at Plant No. 1 will be replaced with new ones and a relocated complex will be constructed to house the Engineering Department staff needed to support implementation of the approved Strategic Plan facilities consistent with the 1999 Final Program Environmental Impact Report. The previous use of this District-owned land was for public storage facilities under a long-term lease terminated in August 2001. The land is now unused,but will be the site of the another temporary trailer complex adjoining the proposed project which will house construction management personnel for the GWRS Project being undertakenjoindy between the District and OCWD. This trailer complex is anticipated to be constructed starting in August 2002 and will house 70 people and cover a land area of 2.05 acres. 0 M)Some,ic Plan Pmgam OR Addendum No,5 K.P.LIMWom,Ix 5 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Not proceeding with this project. This alternative is not recommended because it will have several impacts: • Construction Management staff will not have offices beginning in March 2003. • The new PMO Division staff will not have any work space beginning in March 2003. • The newly restructured Engineering and Construction Division staff will remain separated, decreasing the level of efficiency and collaboration needed between the construction and design staff. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT MODIFICATIONS Potential impacts to environmental resources are evaluated further in this section. None of the proposed modifications would have a potentially significant environmental impact. I. Aesthetics The project modifications would not have a substantial negative effect on the visual resources of the project area.The project could result in short term visual impacts due to construction activity. The PEIR addressed mitigation of possible short-tens impacts to visual resources.Mitigation measure 7.9-1a and 7.9-1b in the PEIR require that contractors restore the alignment areas to pre- project conditions or better to avoid long term visual impacts.Contractors will be required to keep the construction area clean,orderly and free of trash and debris.The modifications to the construction methods would not alter the conclusions of the 1999 EIR or require additional mitigation measures. H. Agricultural Resources The project construction activities will be confined to the already disturbed area that previously was used for storage facilities.No significant agricultural land exists at the project site.The PEIR identified no potential impacts to agricultural resources.The project modifications will contribute no additional impacts to agricultural resources. HI. Air Quality Overall and short-term impacts to air quality due to construction activity at Plant No. l were analyzed in the PEIR. Because the anticipated impacts to air quality due to construction activities OCWa Mgk Plan P Mm EIR Addendum No.5 KP.�[- 6 were already addressed and appropriate mitigation measures adopted in the PEIR,the assembly of _ the trailer complex and construction of decking and parldng will not have any additional impacts to air quality.The project will be subject to the dust control mitigation as provided in the PER. TV. Biological Resources The PEIR analyzed the biological setting for the Reclamation Plant No. I site and determined, given the urban setting that no impacts to biological resources were expected.The entire trailer complex site is located within the treatment plant boundaries. No sensitive plant or animal species are Ialown to occur in the project vicinity nor were they observed at the time of the site visit. The paved nature of the area precluded use by wildlife. The absence of biological resources in the project vicinity and the incorporation of mitigation measures already adopted by the PER for protecting biological resources at the treatment plant site will prevent impacts from occurring. V. Cultural Resources The PER analyzed the potential impacts to cultural resources by the implementation of the facility improvements at Reclamation Plant No. 1. No prehistoric or historic sites have been recorded at the treatment plant site.Therefore no impacts to lmown cultural sites in the project vicinity are expected. Furthermore,the change in temporary site use activity would not significantly change the amount of underground disturbance at the project site only minor excavation will be required for trenching of utility lines. VI.Geology and Soils The entire project site has been significantly modified in the past by human activity. The PEIR addressed the potential for impacts to geology and will.The change in temporary site use would not alter the analysis of the PER. VH.Hazards and Hazardous Materials The PEIR assesses the use of hazardous materials during construction. None are proposed for use in the project,thus implementation of the construction of the trailer complex and parking would not pose additional impacts. man SAaSc Ph P�ER MSeMum No.5 K.P.Lind�1. 7 VHI.Hydrology and Water Quality The PEIR analyzes the potential for the project to impact surface water as well as groundwater. The PEIR establish mitigation measures to avoid and minimize impacts to water quality related to construction activities.The adopted mitigation measures(Measure 7.7-In through H)establish guidelines to be implemented by the contractors to minimize impacts to hydrology and water quality.The conditions include the implementation of Best Management Practices(BMWs)to prevent erosion and sedimentation to avoid significant adverse impacts to surface water quality, preparation of a Spill Prevention,Control,and Countermeasure Plan,and the storing and staging of all equipment in designated staging areas. Implementation of the current mitigation measures already approved for the treatment plant site projects and permit conditions will minimize or avoid impacts to water quality.The mitigation measures in the PER and the compliance with the permits obtained by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for management of stormwater will minimize impacts to hydrology and water quality.No significant impacts are anticipated. IX.Land Use Planning The surrounding land use of the adjoining areas along Ward Street is primarily single-family residences.The PEER adequately addressed the potential impacts anticipated during the construction at the Reclamation Plant No. I site. A short-term closure of northbound lanes of Ward Street will be required for this project to install the new manhole and lateral sewer. The use of the land will be similar to the storage facilities that existed at the site for the past decade. Construction activities(construction of decking and parking lot,assemblage of the trailers and installation of sewer and water lines)will not significantly impact residences since residences are not directly adjacent to the project site. No additional impacts to land use will occur during construction that would alter the determinations included in the PEIR regarding potential land use impacts. X.Mineral Resource All modifications will be to previously disturbed land. As analyzed in the PER no impacts to mineral resources are anticipated. OCSD Smegic Phn Pma�m rR RtlE,np�No.5 KP.Ud�Iva 8 XI.Noise The PEIR assessed the potential impacts of construction activities associated with the construction of Reclamation Plant No. 1 treatment facilities.These impacts can be significant when pile driving is occurring. Efforts to mitigate noise impacts have been undertaken and noise levels are monitored to comply with applicable ordinance requirements. The construction of the trailer complex would not create any additional noise impacts that would change the conclusions of impacts identified in the PEIR.The construction is expected to last for a brief period of 5 months. The project would be subject to noise mitigation provided in the PEIR.No new impacts would be anticipated from the short-term construction project. XH.Population and Housing No impacts to population and housing were identified in the PEIR.The changes in site use should not result in impacts to population and housing. XHL Utilities and Public Services The PEIR fully analyzes the potential public service impacts associated with the treatment plant improvement projects. Mitigation measures have been adopted to assure that emergency service access will not be blocked by construction activity.The contractor will provide a copy of the Traffic Control Plan to the Orange County Sheriffs Department,local police department,and fire departments prior to construction.The District will provide 72 hour notice of construction to the local service providers as provided by(Mitigation measure 7.8-1a)of the PEIR. Mitigation measure 7.8-c of the PEIR also establishes the need to maintain access to fire stations and emergency medical facilities at all time and notify facilities in the project vicinity regarding construction schedule.No additional mitigation measures are necessary. XIV. Recreation There are no designated recreation areas within the treatment plant site. No nearby facilities(such as the Santa Ana River Bicycle trail)will be impacted. The use of the designated bicycle lane along Ward Street will be impacted during the construction of the new manhole and connector sewer.This activity should only last a couple of weeks at most. XV.Transportation and Traffic As described in the PEIR,Ward Street is a 32-foot wide neighborhood collector street,with 2 travel lanes and a striped median. A bicycle lane is provided in both directions. Traffic studies included in the PEIR indicate that average daily trips(ADT)along Ward Street between Ellis oCSD Seangic Plan Po MMftWmn No.5 K.P.Linn lm 9 Avenue and Garfield Avenue carries an average daily traffic load of 14,000 cars a day(OCSD, _ 1999). Construction of a new manhole and 30-inch interne trunk sewer connection in Ward Street will require land closures lasting one or two weeks in the northbound lane. Traffic will be rerouted into the median or merger of the southbomrd lanes. The traffic control plan and construction schedule will he submitted to the City of Fountain Valley. The following measures will be implemented. • Before the implementation of any traffic control plan it will be required that the City of Fountain Valley approve the plan before construction begins. • The project will be completed in approximately 8 months. • General work hours will be weekdays,between the hoots of 7:00 a.m.and 4:00 p.m.,unless otherwise required to limit work hours due to other considerations or specifications of the City of Fountain Valley. CEQA COMPLIANCE The proposed placement of temporary trailers on the site does not warrant the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplements]EIR. The CEQA Guidelines,Section 15164(e),indicates that an Addendum is the appropriate document to identify and analyze minor modifications to the proposed project for which a Final EIR has been certified. An Addendum may be prepared if the modifications do not pose additional significant impacts. Section 15164(e)of the CEQA Guidelines requires an Addendum to include an explanation as to why a subsequent EIR is not necessary. A Subsequent or Supplemental EIR would be required if the project modifications required major revisions to the PEIR and new information of substantial importance that was not available at the time of preparation of the previous EIR. As substantiated in this Addendum,the proposed construction of the temporary trailer complex at the Reclamation Plant No. I project site would not result in major revisions in the project description as analyzed in the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR. This Addendum describes the project modifications and assesses the potential for significant impacts.The project modifications would not alter the conclusions of the PEIR. According to CEQA Section 15164(c),no public circulation or review period is required for an Addendum prepared for a previously circulated and certified Final EIR. The proposed construction modifications to the Reclamation Plant No. I site to accommodate relocation of engineering and construction management personnel to a new trailer complex does not require the adoption of additional mitigation measures that were not already included within DCSD$magi Mn Pmgrun FJR AEtleMmn No-5 X.P.L'mNg•m 1. 10 the PEIR.Furthermore,the modifications do not change the conclusions of the PEIR regarding the significance of environmental impacts. REFERENCES City of Fountain Valley, 1995. General Plan Update. Adopted March 21, 1995. City of Fountain Valley, 1994. Sanitation District's Plant No. I Specific Plan. Adopted by City Council,April 5, 1994. Orange County Sanitation District, 1999. Final Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report,October 1999(prepared by Environmental Science Associates and others). Orange County Sanitation District, 1999. Strategic Plan Joint Works(Vol.4). 1999. Orange County Sanitation District, 2002. Engineering Complex Preliminary Design Report,June 2002. ocM S..&Pan Roam.OR Addendum Nw 5 K.P.LiM nm ac 11 REFERENCES s BOLSA AV AR GO F m a EDINGER AV 3 2 = HUNTI GTO - HEIL W py a BE CH W m WAR JER Ay FOUNTAIN YilR :n � VALL Y LOS PATOS SLATE TALE RT AV*', q �e 0 ELLI qy Q qxYl f 3 GAR ELD AV / GISLER AV oQ � go YORKT WN O 3 AV ER q� ADAM W PAVWILSON N IA APOLI OJECT CATION AT A HAMIL ON PROJECT LOCATION MAP N.T.S. ONCE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SCALN. T TO SCALE ENGINEERING TRAILER COMPLEX AT PLANT NO.I PROJECT NO. No. APPROVED DATE FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION MAP J -9 0 _nr.ama-tvmres an s lumw vun I 1 rmr. is rlm wttioa - ;� _ I � ralanne Imp anm :4 LIMI OF OCS ENGI$l ERING :TFlER COMP X PAVIN ----- - - - SEA mN WCID APFA __I is 7II .\ I as < CO I Y jIII G-. MITS OF OCSO I � i - .HJGINEERING.TRAILER p - �.COMPLErFTANG - - -- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .... ..-._ -(WINFIELD AVENUE - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Sc,Ei J00-O- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT J ENGINEERING TRAILER COMPLEX AT PLANT NO.I PROJECT NO- FIGURE 2 PROJECT SITE LAYOUT J -9 0 102VDATE ATTACHMENT 'A' PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 1t .S I `' �� �: f ` � 4 Ham,` Ii 'I � i !1•' 'i .• �• � View • _nEgret 9 . View from Garfield Ave 1 ` • 1�M1 � 1( h . i I' I e. y 4 lV..y.• _ ^'"dry. .41�f•.•d`q i-'.•43 i�-v �wrt:Y.'La do M- kja m YI•NAi fart^S� 't `. 44• hr,l lt. t •� � f N-. Existing •rth of the Project Location) 4 tI •�• e Y + ,t • Street and Garfield , . Crossing Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation MINUTES September 26, 2001 V�JN�Y SANITgT�oy 9 C c+ �cr�N�THE ENV��o ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 .I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FINANCING CORPORATION ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation (OCSDFC)was called to order on September 26,2001, at 8:16 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrods, Chair Constance Underhill X Peter Green, Vice Chair Dave Garofalo X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory A Shawn Boyd John Larson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Guy Carrozzo Larry Crandall X Brian Donahue Bill Estrada X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X John M. Gullbmon Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley Beth Krom X Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Shirley McCracken Tom Daly X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Ray Moore Marty Simonoff A MarkA. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson -X-'Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan -X-'Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams 7-'Jerry Sigler Jim Dow A Jim Silva Chuck Smith A I Paul Walker Kenneth Blake APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the meeting held on August 23, 2000 be deemed approved, as mailed. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Gary Streed, gave a verbal report on the progress the OCSDFC made during the past year. Accomplishments include obtaining a AA category stand alone credit rating; refunded $12.4 i 1 million of 6.36%fixed rate debt; refunded $164.3 million VRDO; extended the maturity three years, purchase value cost of$175,000 but lower annual payments of$2 million per year; issued reimbursement COPS of$35.7 million; and the VRDO rate from 8/23/00 to 8/31/01 was 2.79%. Currently the Finance Corporation is seeking a financial advisor; obtained formal approval by the FAHR Committee for a debt policy; and the current adopted budget includes $260 million for a COP Issue. The Finance Corporation will be looking to evaluate the use of borrowing, evaluate competitive v. negotiated sales, user fee increases to cover debt service, and additional meetings held to approve future issues. In response to Directors questions it was clarified that the OCSDFC would report their actions through the FAHR Committee. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting of the Orange County Sanitation District Financing Corporation adjourned at 8:26 p.m. ..'1ZI ''i? . Secretary the Boar f Directors of Orange Counl Sanita ton District Financing Corporation G:\.p.dtalagendaTmrd Minutes12001 Board MlnuteMOCSD Finmw.092601.doc LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART II A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: June 4, 2002 RE: 3121 Michelson Drive LLP v. Orange County Sanitation District a/k/a Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership As I have previously advised you, 3121 Michelson Drive LLP, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, of which Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership ("CWDLP") is the Manager, filed a new, but virtually identical in every respect, lawsuit against the District on December 28, 2001, but did not serve the District with the proceeding until February 26, 2002. With the exception of changing the name of the Petitioner from CWDLP to 3121 Michelson Drive LLP, they have alleged all of the facts with the same wording and in the same order. We, on behalf of the District, opted to file a legal challenge, known as a "Demurrer" on the basis that even assuming that whatever was alleged in the Petition was true, it still did not constitute legal basis for the litigation. I am pleased to report that on Thursday, May 30, 2002, the matter was heard by Judge James Brooks, who sustained the District's Demurrer, without leave to amend. The ruling is somewhat unusual, in that Trial Court Judges are typically very hesitant to not afford a Plaintiff/Petitioner the opportunity to amend its Complaint/Petition to properly allege facts that could constitute a valid claim. In this case, however, Judge Brooks realized that it was identical to the first case, and that once again, the Petitioner had failed to comply with the statute of limitations, and also filed the wrong type of lawsuit when a singularly-exclusive proceeding is provided for in the law. I would also advise that CWDLP has filed a Notice of Appeal of the Decision and Judgment in favor of the District in the first lawsuit, and so I would fully expect that they would likewise appeal this case. ;IFHOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:pI LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Members of the Board Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: June 7, 2002 RE: Request by County of Orange and the City of Santa Ana for a Waiver of District's Capital Facilities Capacity Charges ("CFCC's") At the May meeting of the Steering Committee, it reviewed a request from the County of Orange to have the District waive the CFCC's for parcels of property located adjacent to the city of Santa Ana and within the city's sphere of influence. The properties are improved with 49 single family residences and 33 apartments most all of which are still disposing of their sewage by means of septic tanks rather than connections to the system. The County is embarking on a program to clean up and eliminate all of the"islands"and annex them to the cities. This area is one that Is being actively pursued and the City has apparently agreed to accept it. They had requested that the District waive the CFCC's which are approximately$125,000. The Steering Committee voted against the waiver of the charges but did indicate that they would strongly recommend to the full Board a time payment plan of several years by which the charges could be paid. As a follow up to that, I talked to Bill Mahoney, Assistant CEO of the County, who has been managing this program and who submitted the request. I advised Bill of the recommendation by our Steering Committee and he acknowledged that and indicated that he would probably just simply pursue the idea of a payment schedule so as to make the cost burden on the individual property owners minimum. He further indicated that he would keep working on the program and when the details of their final program were developed he would get back to the District for purposes of exploring the need for a payment schedule for the CFCC's. California Health and Safety Code Section 5474 allows the District to enter into an Installment payment agreement with a property owner to pay the CFCC's over a period of up to 15 years with interest at a rate up to twelve percent (12%). The District's own Ordinance Number OCSD-18, Section 3.05E provides for an agreement of up to five (5 years)with Interest at a rate not to exceed ten percent(10%). THOALWOO EM GNERLINOSDERLU�F � TLW:jIo cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G.Streed Ms. P. Kyle Mr. D.A.Ludwin X183135XI LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Members of the Board Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: June 7, 2002 RE: Howard Jarvis Tax Pavers Association v. City of Salinas On June 3, 2002 the Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District issued its ruling and decision on a taxpayer's suit challenging a storm drainage fee adopted by the City of Salinas. The challenge was based upon an alleged violation of California Constitution Article XIIID (Proposition 218). 1 report this case to you directly because of questions, similar to that raised in the case, that have been presented to your Board during the past year on the subject of urban runoff. The City of Salinas elected to adopt by ordinance, without a vote of the people, a fee on users of its storm water drainage system. The amount of the fee was calculated according to the degree to which the property contributed runoff to the CWs drainage facilities. The Plaintiffs challenged this ordinance on the basis that it was a "property related fee" as defined under Proposition 218, and thus was required to have an approving vote of the Electorate. During the past year OCSD has participated in a number of stone water and urban runoff projects in conjunction with the County of Orange, the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Newport Beach, and in doing so has simply absorbed the cost of doing so from its general budget. Those projects with the other entities have been memorialized by agreement which does provide that at a certain point in time when the total stone water Flow exceeds 4 million gallons, then fees will be charged to all of the contract participating agencies. What has been presented for discussion and issue without prior resolution is whether the District, if it engages in significant urban runoff programs of its own, would have the ability to offset those costs by simply increasing its annual sewer service charge or its capital facilities capacity charge. I have previously provided an informal discussion and opinion to your Board of Directors indicating that the case was proceeding through the Appellate Courts as a result of a challenge to the City of Salinas ordinance and while the City prevailed at the Trial Court, I offered the opinion that 1 was not very optimistic that the ruling would be upheld on appeal. 1153140NI June 7, 2002 Page 2 The Appellate Court, now having found that such storm drainage fees are in violation of Article XIIID, would place the OCSD at substantial risk if it attempted to enact a comparable fee without a vote of the Electorate. While the opinion does come from a different District than the Appellate District serving Orange County, it is deemed as precedent law. It is my opinion that at this time, the District could not validly enact by ordinance, a fee to pay for the cost of urban runoff management, either as a separate fee or an incremental increase to the District's existing sewerage fees. The Court of Appeal specifically held that storm drainage fees are not "sewer fees." If the case is appealed to the Supreme Court and it is accepted for consideration and decision, the District could simply await the final outcome. If it is not appealed, then the Salinas case will be deemed to be controlling law and the District would need to consider having any such fees submitted to the voters of the entire District for approval. I would also note that the District sponsored bill, authored by Assemblyman Tom Harman (AB 1892) simply authorizes OCSD to engage in urban runoff/drainage programs. It does not attempt to equate any drainage fees that may be considered, with "sewer fees." Thus, the bill does not provide any relief from the ruling in the Salinas case. 2s/ THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:jIo cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson EMT \153140\1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Members of the Board Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: June 10, 2002 RE: Award of Contract—Job Number 1-2-4 The action requested of your Board is to relieve Colich & Sons, LP from its bid, due to mathematical errors, and to award the bid to the second low responsible bidder. It is the recommendation of Staff and this Office that the request of Colich & Sons, LP be granted for the reasons set forth below. For public works contracts the District, as with most public agencies, must proceed on the basis of a published notice inviting bids and requiring all proposals to be submitted at a time certain in a sealed package. The governing state law prohibits any bidder from being relieved of its bid or to change its bid without the consent of the awarding authority. California Public Contracts Code, however, does allow a bidder to request relief upon proof of mistake and compliance by the contractor with the notice requirements to the agency. The bidder must establish: 1. A mistake was made; 2. It gave the District written notice within five (5) days after opening of the bids specifying in detail how the mistake occurred; 3. The mistake made its bid materially different than it intended; 4. The mistake was made in filling out the bid. Within five (5) days of the bid opening, the District was notified by Colich & Sons, LP that it had made a serious error in the final preparation of the bid which it submitted and requested relief pursuant to Public Contracts Code. Upon receipt of the request, the Engineering Department and this Office undertook an investigation, which included inquiring of the pipe supplier who provided the component item that was mistakenly entered by Colich. Additionally, we personally met with representatives of Colich & Son, LP, including the President and the Chief Estimator who prepared the proposal. Lastly, we examined the 100+ pages of computer calculations leading to a submittal. Based upon all of the above, we are satisfied that an adjustment in the cost price submitted by the pipe supplier to Colich was in fact erroneously deducted twice within a few minutes of the bid submittal, resulting in an error of$900,000. June 10, 2002 Page 2 It is our opinion that this was a clear and honest mistake in the preparation of the bid and is valid basis for the Board to grant relief to the bidder. By granting relief the District has two options—namely, to award the contract to the second low bidder or to reject all bids and start the process anew. It is the Staffs recommendation that the award be made to the second low bidder. If the determination of the Board is to grant this relief, one of the requested action items for your Board is to adopt a report, and it is recommended that it approve and adopt this report of your General Counsel as the report required by Public Contracts Code Section 5101(b) establishing the facts by which the relief is granted. �l2GJ THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:jIo cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. D. A. Ludwin Ms. P. Kyle