The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-05-22 May 16, 2002 GRANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOTICE OF MEETING glmne: (714)962-2411 BOARD OF DIRECTORS h . 17141962-0366 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT rrww.aoe.tam stooling mM,ass: WEDNESDAY, MAY 22, 2002 - 6:30 P.M. PO 6.8127 Po.m...Vane,.ra 92728-0127 ""taAvenu. DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10 str eiia Avenue r n.m Vane,,o 10844 Ellis Avenue 9270E-7018 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member Aetna. The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation • District will be held at the above location, time and date. cities Anaheim Bret Buena Perk r c Lypress ' Faun.m Melia, Bo d ecretary Fullerton Garden G . Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Pelma wo M.MUs F,ae art Beach Tentatively- Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Lkange Raceme Ban.Ana Seel Beach B.nton Tuson wla Perk OMITS COMMITTEE -Wednesday,June 5, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. Vbrba unda County of orange PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday,June 6, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT scale., ontrio: SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday,June 10,2002 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD Ws.Mesa Unway tit, FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday,June 12, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. Water Districts SPECIAL BOARD MEETING -Wednesday,June 19,2002 at 6:00 p.m. Irvine Ranch STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday,June 26,2002 at 5:00 p.m. To mainml world class leaeershp in wastewater and water resource management. BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting June June 26, 2002 July 'July 17, 2002 August August 28, 2002 September September 25, 2002 October October 23, 2002 November November 20 2002 December *December 18, 2002 January January 22, 2003 February February 26, 2003 March March 26, 2003 April April 23, 2003 May May 28, 2003 'Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month G1wp.dW%admin 5M9enda\2002 Mee0ng No0ees%MN5.2.doo SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGAN IZATIONIFIRM leaseprint) I .1 leaseprint) 04rseal 13eacil / c OCw9 �k r�P r 621"fv SCL T .R ale `Z'CQp �G flTGhn�L' J G� /CE.YI 1IG n GG �.4A14 l CLAN �3E�K HAWRDTAIADMINWWORM WON-IN FORM.DOC ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 05/22/02 TIME: 6:30 o.m. (MURPHY)........................ALVAREZ......................�L (SIMONIAN) ....................ANDERSON.................... G ✓ — (FLORY) .......................... 13MKHEAD.................... L — (MILLER)......................... BRADY ........................�� ✓ — (LARSON) ....................... CAMPBELL ...................�G — — (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK. DEBBIE.............. — (CRANDALL).................... COOK, LAURANN.......... . — (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE.................... ._� — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE...................L ✓ _ (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... ✓ i — — (DUVALL)......................... GI46WW,6N...................i ✓ _ (DEBOLT)......................... JEMPSA...................... �� ✓ — (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... — (SMITH)............................ KROM........................ ✓ — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... ✓ ff — — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN...............✓ ✓ — (CHRISTY)....................... MC GUIGAN.................. . _G — (SIMONOFF).................... MOORE........................ �G — (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ — — (FRESCHI)....................... PATTERSON................. ✓ — — (KEENAN)........................ PIERCY......................... � — (ADAMS) ......................... RIDGEWAY................... .....� ✓ — — (DOW).............................. SIGLER......................... _ — (SMITH. CHUCK)..:.......... SILVA........................... — (BLAKE)............................WALKER....................... ✓ — STAFF: nL Anderson ✓ U �, _ „s,• Ghirelli Kyle Ludwin a Mathews ✓ Miles ✓ Murphy ✓ Ooten ✓ M 05/22/02 Wwp.dtaUdmWBSDIRECT0R0rectm Rd CaLdw '�t= � ST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 5 —1' 1 �� AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) C..Glr>c\-'1 �T\jk:T1�l HOME ADDRESS: IN \ (A1�J\.' ` V- (\� (number/street) {� (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: /� (self/name of organ lion) /IPl�Pitl rye e-cl�f6x/�e„� REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: S" 2 Z —OZ AGENDA ITEM NO. SG.�s� 4 Arc Jxe/ 9 YYYYYfYrtY # #DYfrtrt # # # # # # # R1RR RRR �-'w c/1 --4jC NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: /`l.rL A/� (number/street) tA-, rx, a r F t 9 z crRa (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 7/Y- 7S,3 -IL REPRESENTING: .$'EL (self/name of organization) r �✓` REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: Z�Z'q l (numbe treet) �J (city/zip code) -y �l ,7/y TELEPHONE: 77 / /`S� J REPRESENTING, G� (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS U��'tw. All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: '5—2 2 -D Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) VAW HOME ADDRESS: /23z E• (number/street) CA (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 7114 — &3 -7—,e 647 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS L All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. / DATE: 5 Z AGENDA ITEM NO. /00,0Uc- -0Yt7 S:V1.� NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: OS A/0 (number/street) yy�� ; "mcC mirk (Xd 9a7g0 Z�o �/`ti9 (city/zip code) tN 9 t TO rN TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: e�ft��/(�JQ MIZ-1MIZ-1 ��{� 5T44A Ar (self/name of organization) V / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . .,,��.11,,. .,.I . . . ..r . . . . .�. /.) . . . . NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) 9t 2 -z- (city/zip code) �` - TELEPHONE: t �q,D�,L12-.Lyv�/ 2,'' ✓�I _,✓/ I�'"U�. REPRESENTING: l e�� (Se /namlf a of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: S" 2 21 ) —z- AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) 75 am{ I" V l6 I ("1 HOME ADDRESS: ( 0L` oc 6AA\%M _I. f _ (number/street) �A Q C (city/zip code) �/ �/ V Y �/ TELEPHONE: I 1 H p X l� i( ' X /'/ —X— /� n/1 Q / REPRESENTING: 4LL C V't r I 1 U g 1Fi S l'l R C/ S/, I/ I L L (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Z Z- O'e AGENDA ITEM NO. JPU [(L NAME: (please print) :a p HOME ADDRESS: Z-0 (number/street) (city/zip pco(d�e)) Q TELEPHONE: [ G r ' ��""v�� /�JJ 3 4�'�,,, REPRESENTING: oc�np . CJ�T�K�� v &<- (self/name of organization) L REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the speck Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: KI 22 p--.%- AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) DO(t j ti HOME ADDRESS: awl a 9. M 2,k h lad r (number/street) 1os k�\21ti1c� oS CP+ (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: v��2 -z ?- 0 REPRESENTING: Sm1 ��-/-41'. a —I �yt1'�tc� ?t, oh (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: J �(7�V a AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) A K EP, q HOME ADDRESS: -[.$+-lbe� !/lF4/��'i� Cri (numr/street) /-/ 6 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of org ization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) L HOME ADDRESS: leii/c / /o 6 `%4. y (numbeer/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: "7 /�f - C/ /04 7 REPRESENTING: /') 11 L7 (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 2 2 o2- AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: - J! 26�- (number/street) (city/zip code) L� �^ TELEPHONE: c (' `�— C(S- ��)�(03/� REPRESENTING: Je l e 'FQLL� Y�LC�-� j20 (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) z�a L //��C95f'L ! HOME ADDRESS: Z—ZAre Cep .. (numb rr/strttrreret) (city/zip co e) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: 7-+C (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ZL `'vs 1i AGENDA ITEM NO. `f! rhM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : . NAME: (please print) L i HOME ADDRESS: vQ (number/street) b�(e,r��r/street) N JJ (cityy//ziippcode) q TELEPHONE: ` "f 1 ' 2L� I 1 REPRESENTING: ac (self/name of organization) ;/ /� REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ZZ /� Z AGENDA ITEM NO. S ftJ p C.(Iq JPI NAME: (please print) t ' i { . { 0 L) * . *KO 1Z1 1 ' /o II HOME ADDRESS: �� Ma Y y l S `A (number/street) S-eo& BI a of C f3 (city/zip code) l G� TELEPHONE: Z— /7?U —2 /' REPRESENTING: <'e (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) �-�`S �""" �� HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) ^ ^ CT (city/zipp7code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All rsons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 5 ZZ ZZW Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) ��4Risrir- �c�K HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) oNG c/7 9�803 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ( 5G2) y34, 7291 REPRESENTING: N!°c<s W Nto/ews w/ a swim dp•�yi�/r�/�fsO17 (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the speck item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) @- HOME ADDRESS: `l—A��l f3Qz (numbe(number/street)A6Y 5 L �� 6 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: 006- (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ��a Z — AGENDA ITEM NO. NO. 1I NAME: (please print) e ' e ' �+-� "' *�*'^ / I pa HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) tff� gam �8r (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: �y REPRESENTING: Su rz fA dove. ( '� i •� (self/name of organization) ,. / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 4AY Z 2, Zooz_ AGENDA ITEM NO.s fOW16MTs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) ALL/gM 6rEK HOME ADDRESS: Zoo? Ht(;�PD (number/street) NrwPogr 0&7ACtf EA• 42660— YY07 (city/Zip code) TELEPHONE: 9 9-Y- 6 4 S- l P l9 REPRESENTING: SELF (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: .2,/,0 02 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) �/1/1k n e I � n a /�e/J HOME ADDRESS: `7-Fj / e� (number/street) (city/zip'c/ode /y TELEPHONE: /� 'T��L REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. PC, NAME: (please print) 6c4 mye ' rFnd 10 HOME ADDRESS: Z 'l 5 / - Y/Ls (number/street) orc(,1150. (A 9zP) C9 � (city/zip codey I (} TELEPHONE: Z'CJ 8 / REPRESENTING: 'fo/�-/ (self/name of organization) L / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: T 2Z 4 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (/C' (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: L S3 REPRESENTING: �!/ C/o r (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All p ons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest s uld complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 5;�2- O AGENDA ITEM NO. C /2. ,Mt ay, , , , , , , NAME: (please pdnt) �= < O HOME ADDRESS: -3 a- (numberlstreet) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: ��Lc 7�/J S—S 9 A- REPRESENTING: T2L: (self name of organization) �I(l M t REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AI ersons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) 2 TELEPHONE: eje REPRESENTING: (self/n a of organization) _ � _, ) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS i" All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. y/ DATE: s/�"H O'Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) / I'Zk �� yT�Cpt HOME ADDRESS: ///X, L3wy /JLl)E A6. (number/street) qq rOGlnrR./� [/2��Lci. Kx 9aZ��8 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 7�s�- J 3�-7 J -"? 0 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS l All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. If6XIVST- C(/)(!�F2— NAME: (please print) /"I ,41te Jr 14/40 Alt- HOME ADDRESS: 30 S � 'r�•-� a�'L �• (number/�s)reet) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: ,d/�/lt!GP/ (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES IRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: Jr a AGENDA ITEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) 1w O HOME ADDRESS: r/street) S�dL� 9074-0 (city/zip code) �,q TELEPHONE: �G� CT6:k� //�7c7 REPRESENTING: �o_,Y ( cAiV "O",'T6 Ahe (self/name of organization) Tj REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the speci item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 C S REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGE,N\Dq(rJI + NAME: (please print) ^� d '' ff HOME ADDRESS: ( OI.J r (nu mber/s ) code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) rew d I-y%"el ,QA.e.S� (�i1tZr.Rta �S✓ Co+2R r+ r fd-1 l ,o lbtoeA- � PoLt* 7 0 dJ 12 C.riz H%WP.0TAWDMIMBS\F0RM54SIGN.IN FORM.DOC the Peup/earc mr City �oAzo A4�f�0A Ct rlL� i=o12 .uAY 2'Z1 2007_ Mayor V`E X� Councilmembers: CHRISTOPHER A.LOWE a 9 CONSTANCE UNDERHILL NORMAN Z.ECKENRODE Ciry ACminisb for SCOTT P.SRADY ROBERT D'AMATO JUDY A.DICKINSON ALL AMERICA CITY k 401 Easr Chapman Avenue-P/acenria, Ca/iNmia 92870 May 6, 2002 Mr. Blake Anderson, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Dear Mr. Blake, On behalf of the City of Placentia, I would like to express my concern regarding the proposed requirement to increase the current level of wastewater treatment. The City of Placentia strongly opposes the secondary treatment of wastewater until scientific proof exists to require such a dramatic change in treatment. Countless surveys and studies have yet to determine that secondary treatment of wastewater will make a substantial difference in ocean water quality. The implementation of a "full secondary" level of wastewater treatment will impact the Orange County Sanitation District with substantial cost increases. These increases will be placed on individual cities and their residents. The City of Placentia could possibly see a S400 to $500 thousand increase in charges for sewer fees. This increase will impact human resource and community service programs, as well as local law enforcement initiatives. Sewer rates could potentially rise as much as 100 percent to satisfy the cost of a multi-million dollar change in treatment. Placentia residents are concerned about preserving the earth's resources and reducing pollution to the environment. However, until secondary treatment is proven necessary through scientific studies, residents are not in favor of dramatic increases to their sewer rates. At this time, a pending Environmental Science Report has not been received, substantiating cost increases and Once again, the City of Placentia strongly discourages any modifications to the current level of wastewater treatment until conclusive evidence determines changes are necessary. The City of Placentia appreciates the opportunity to express its concerns about wastewater treatment. If I can answer any further questions regarding Placentia's position on wastewater treatment I can be reached at 714-993-8117. Sincerely , <C L Robert D'Amato City Administrator F-8��LS 3®aiw nc,Ww�n OF �rZ MAY 2Z� Loot LMA GATHEAINE STANDIEORD CM AMNnc[a Office of the City Manager May 14, 2002 Ms. Penny Kyle Clerk of the Board Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Dear Ms I . Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 2002-22, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Palma, California, Relating to the Discharge of Wastewater into the Ocean by the Orange County Sanitation District which was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on May 7, 2002. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincer , Ta ' . Piscotty Assistant to the City Manager TKPlprt Enclosures (1) Phone 714.690.3333 Fax 714.523.2141 7822 Walker Street • La Palma • California 90623-1771 • www.cityoflapalma.org RESOLUTION NO. 2002-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE LA PALMA CITY COUNCIL RELATING TO THE DISCHARGE OF WASTEWATER INTO THE OCEAN BY THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the intent of the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act is to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the nations waters"; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is a special district that provides wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services to 21 cities with about 2,35 million residents in central, and northern Orange County including the residents and businesses in La Palma, and WHEREAS, the OCSD has been operating under a waiver, known as a 301 (h) waiver, of the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) since 1985, which allows for the release of ocean discharge that contains higher levels of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and greater Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)than otherwise allowed under the CWA; and WHEREAS, the OCSD, as the third largest wastewater agency west of the Mississippi, releases approximately 240 million gallons of wastewater into the ocean each day; and WHEREAS, OCSD is one of only 36 Sanitation Agencies nationwide operating under a 301 (h)waiver for secondary treatment; and WHEREAS, close to 80% of the wastewater comes from residential uses such as sinks, toilets, showers, laundry and dishwashers and 20% from business uses; and WHEREAS, La Palma residents, along with residents throughout Orange County, use the ocean and its beaches for recreational purposes and recognize that taking steps to eliminate potential sources of contamination is an important public health and economic goal for the region; and WHEREAS, beach contamination can, and most probably does, result from a variety of sources, including but not limited to urban runoff, local sewer overflow, ocean wastewater discharges and natural animal sources; and WHEREAS, efforts to determine the relationship between, and relative contribution of all sources of ocean contamination are complicated by various in water temperature, currents, tides,wave action, runoff amounts and numerous other factors; and WHEREAS, a county-vide strategy needs to be employed to address all sources of beach and ocean contamination through source control, management treatment and other means available; and WHEREAS, the health and economic benefits of addressing sources of beach contamination justify public expenditures needed to provide requisite treatment; and WHEREAS, the OCSD is charged with protecting the health and safety of the public and marine life has a proven history of employing the best methods of treatment and technology; WHEREAS, by continuing to demonstrate leadership as a waste treatment agency committed to the preservation of our fragile ecosystems the OCSD advances the goal of encouraging other agencies and municipalities to act in a responsible manner to address the comprehensive challenges that our region faces in assuring our oceans remain clean, healthy and safe environments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the La Palma City Council hereby support OCSD and its Board of Directors In Immediately proceeding with planning, design, and implementation of treatment options that would allow the agency to fully comply with the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act, including a schedule for construction of facilities to provide full secondary treatment levels;and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the La Palma City Council hereby support's OCSD's efforts to take early actions to disinfect wastewater Flows discharged to the ocean ouffall until further treatment projects can be fully implemented; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the La Palma City Council requests that in conjunction with the above actions, OCSD prepare and adopt a plan of works for facilities to provide full secondary treatment levels, and submit necessary documentation to EPA to eliminate the need for a waiver of full secondary discharge requirements under Section 301 (h) of the Federal Clean Water Act. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of La Palma at a regular meeting held on the r day of May 2002. '1 Mayor ATTEST: ilt,�L\Caerk -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF LA PALMA ) I, TAMI K. PISCOTTY, City Clerk of the City of La Palma, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 7'^ day of May 2002, and that it was so adopted by called vote as follows: AYES: Aragon, Barnes, Blake, Duke, Walker NOES: None ABSENT: None CU1vtit C' le / f -3 - . CITY OF M /A� � 1A +P AL _ CATHERINE STANDIFORD CM MANAGER Office of the City Manager May 14, 2002 Ms. Penny Kyle Clerk of the Board Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valle , CA 92708-7018 Dear Ms IP Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 2002-22, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Palma, California, Relating to the Discharge of Wastewater into the Ocean by the Orange County Sanitation District which was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on May 7, 2002. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincer , Ta . Piscotty Assistant to the City Manager TKP/prt Enclosures (1) Phone 714.690.3333 Fax 714.523.2141 7822 Walker Street • La Palma • California 90623-1771 • www.cityoflapalma.org STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF LA PALMA ) I, TAMI K. PISCOTTY, City Clerk of the City of La Palma, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 7' day of May 2002, and that it was so adopted by called vote as follows: AYES: Aragon, Barnes, Blake, Duke,Walker NOES: None ABSENT: None 1 1 -3 - " City of La Habra ., ADMINISTRATION BUILDING "A Caring Conurm ay" 201 E.La Habra Boulevard +us P.O.Box 337 La Habra,CA 90633-0337 Office:(562)905-9700 Fax;(562)905-9719 April 17, 2002 Honorable Norman Eckenrode, Chairman Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Chairman Eckenrode: This letter is to advise you and the Board of Directors that on April 15, 2002 the La Habra City Council took action to approve and adopt Resolution No. 4802 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA HABRA IN OPPOSITION TO AB 1969 (MADDOX) REGARDING WASTE WATER DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS. Enclosed is a certified copy of Resolution No. 4802. Sincerely, Shade Apodaca City Clerk Enc. 1 Copy: Steve Anderson, Councilmember and OCSD Director ®PriniMrn Fe[yekJ Poper. RESOLUTION NO. 4802 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA HABRA DECLARING ITS OPPOSITION TO ASSEMBLY BILL 1969 (MADDOX) REGARDING WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS. Whereas, all of north and central Orange Comity's wastewater, or sewage, is received and processed by the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD); and Whereas, the now-consolidated OCSD serves about 2.35 million people across 24 cities and 470 square miles in north and central Orange County, including the residents and businesses of La Habra; and Whereas, OCSD produces about 533 wet tons of wastewater biosolids each day and sends another 236 million gallons per day of effluent out a 5.1 mile ocean Outfall; and Whereas OCSD, like many sanitation agencies, has facilities to treat wastewater using the preliminary treatment and odor control,primary treatment, and secondary treatment; and Whereas, OCSD currently operates under a Section 301 (h) permit which waives the Federal Clean Water Act's full secondary treatment requirement; and said permit expires in June 2002;" and Whereas, AB1969 authored by Assembly Member Maddox, would require State and Regional Boards, including OCSD, to improve its level of treatment of wastewater to full secondary treatment; and Whereas, the OCSD claims the Maddox Bill is premature and there is no urgency behind the bill. The OCSD opposes AB 1969 based on the following: • The California Ocean Plan has been adequately protecting public health and the environment for 30 years. • The concerns raised by the public relate to disinfection practices, not whether or not OCSD operates under full secondary treatment. • Orange County beaches are generally meeting the AB 411 standards and there is no evidence linking elevated counts to its operation. • All government has a responsibility to spend taxpayer dollars prudently. It is unclear whether full secondary treatment will be either effective or needed to adequately protect public health and the environment, therefore early intervention with AB 1969 is premature. "I,Cay park of the City of la HebM haraq artiy that the bo9Ip is a fA tr+r,and amd copy of the awl on fie U thb0111m k.0 sm(�tt.� �`r(fin oIDn L\/n _tweP`kkL� CN Clerk of the Crtvof to Habra Data • AB 1969 would impose an unfunded mandate upon local jurisdictions. • OCSD already took action to fast track disinfection within the framework of CEQA. OCSD has a plan in place, and the necessary funding and ability to accomplishment this goal. • AB 1969 adds nothing to the long term planning or financing objectives of the OCSD. • AB 1969 overrides the purpose of the OCSD Board of Directors, which was created by the State Legislature for the express purpose of managing wastewater. Section 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the La Habra City Council hereby concurs with the reasoning of the Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors, and declares its opposition to AB 1969(Maddox). The City Clerk is directed to mail a certified copy of this resolution to Assembly Member Maddox and the Orange County Sanitation Board of Directors. This resolution shall be entered into the official book of resolutions. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED,APPROVED AND AODPTED this 15'day of April, 20 nian,Mayor Attest: 1 Shane L. ApodacafCity Clerk ;SIUvy'Jo..o� 9h :4 ON -61 Sul STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF LA HABRA ) I, Sharie L. Apodaca,City Clerk for the City of La Habra, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and coaecf copy of Resolution No. 4802 introduced and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of La Habra held on the 15" day of April, 2002 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCII.MEMBERS: GARCIA, ESPINOZA,ANDERSON,RUSH, SIMONIAN NOES: COUNCII.MEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Witness my hand and the official seal of the City of La Habra this 16th day of April, 2002. Sharie L.Apodaca, ity Clerk j 3 " HUMAN VIRUSES FOUND IN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATERS -" o a F SAC NO SWIMMING VIOLATERS WILL BE PROSECUTED' Y2.OdC� ,nJ .t4 0. SHOULD IT BE THE OTHER WAY AROUND QC' =t+�G� POLUTERSWILLBEPROSECUTED\ 9 OA,� FOR CAUSING HEALTH HAZARDS! 'a v1gW:L o v�• � P : AKApNGNINHA i2NA CKAN UTO NATO " 3a c2��F o"=��J o"S . � IARGOW SNINKIIE YEA bt, FAWOIN IANISTAS N SNINNINS �" + "13EQh ° NIEISI ��• �u� FNINIIIN EL FAIN N NTN VEHICLES ki,��CpP 0J `rv� lE VEHIFINIS NITIAIZAII$ � 4 `9 SECRETARIA 1E IESARRILLI = 011 Y ECU:IfiIA " d — AIIINISTNACIN /E 2NA FEKRR HANITINA- m` TEANESTRE EN ENSENAIA I.C. w 01 -SEDLIE.FAI6NANA: 7ANlrlrlripl V CIWF Rvr.-. ° " The risk of kbmamination from human waste appears to be significant according to a survey of 12 river mounts in LOS Angeles,Orange and San Diego ` o talnties cmckicted by assiatam professor Sunny Jiiarg at the University of \alNomia, home. o N kl e \ d ao N � � N It _ a O 4 as a 3 n a • � 3 n � 3 3 @ 1 b 3 There are more than 100 viruses found in human waste that can survive ° for as long as 130 days in seawater. None of these are tracked in routine ka o a tests by California health offncals, m °� P= y YES ON MADDOX/HARMON m a a SPONSORED o n ABI969 ASSEMBLY BILL m a PARTOF THE SOLUTION TO POLUT.N y[ THEFATEOFONEBEACH - A� WILL EVENTUALLY BE THE i QZy FATEOF'ANOTHER BEACH - I• A j L ;0 THE DOMINO EFFECT IN PROGRESS 4�99 •A DUMPTHE31011 WAIVER, Woerr e'nal u!! q z District Needs to Dump the 301 H waiver,go with Mandatoryyseenn'^d Stage if u[Third Sanitation Treatment to our Sewane hcfnre it Tv dn.n ins.....n,...., E�EI`:-cD -sI ho April 24,2002 , :... .., .iJl TO:OCSD Board of Directors ' Re:AB 1969(Maddox)Bill Political Lobbying. Deer Board Members; As you know,the AB 1969(Maddox)Bill would require OCSD to fully comply with the provisions of the 1972 Federal Clean Water Am(CWA). This law clearly states that all sewage discharged into the ocean from a Public Owned Treatment Works(POTW)must be treated to at least full secondary treatment standards prior to discharge. At a hearing held this weak in Sacramento before the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee,it is my understanding that OCSD sent staff members and a paid lobbyist(Scott Baugh)to argue before the committee against passage of this important Orange County bill.Presumably,the costs for this trip,as well as other lobbying expenses are paid for by OCSD from taxpayer(ratepayer)dollars.(I am also an OCSD rate paym),I recognize that OCSD staffmkes this action because they believe that it is in the best interest of OCSD rate payers.However,not all of us Orange County residents(and rate payers)would necessarily agrce with OCSD's position on this issue. It is not the intention of tbis communication to argue the merits of the bill.What is important,in my opinion,is that in the interest of fairness and objectivity,an equal opportunity in terms of public funding and travel and consulting expenses should be made available to those stakeholders in the environmental community that have a strong,but contrary position to the staffat OCSD with respect to this issue.These funds should come from the same source that OCSD has for lobbying thew own political views The Ocean Outfall Croup,for example,is such a coalition of Orange County rate payers and con"med citizens.Their membership consists of the general public as well as representatives of several environmental organizations web as the Sierra Club,Surfrider Foundation,Natural Resources Defense Council,Defend the Bay, Cosstkeeper,and others.Funding the activities of this citizens group in this manner would insure that our policy and lawmakers in Sacramento would be able to make a more informed decision based on full disclosure of all of the science and facts relating to this issue. I am asking the Board members to consider placing this issue on a future agenda for discussion,and public awareness. I am sure that you will agree that this request is only fair and equitable,and in the true spirit ofa democrat . �� Don Schulz Member,OCSD PAC2 -TJ III 0 'J • Roa2o .gaewat- Pneauwgc CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION o/ SANITATION AGENCIES nO 925 L Street,Suite 1400•Sacramento,CA 95814•TEL:(916)446-0388—FAX:(916)448-4808•wwwensaweb.org In N � By 13, 2002 MICFLM E.DIEEON Execudn Di.,do Ms. Lisa Murphy lubbrut Communications Manager ROBERTAL LfRSON Orange County Sanitation District Dirarorof level and P.O. Box 8127 Resistant, st President "— Fountain Valley,CA 92728-7018 JEANM.MAEIAM Sanitary Dunks No.l Dear Ms. Murphy: ofmarin C°unry 53 El Paml Drin Greenbru.CA 94904 The California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA)recently received a presentation Tel(415)5544316 Fax(415)554.7828 about the Groundwater Replenishment System, a new,proposed water purification project seeremr),-Tress .r sponsored by the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District. PAU X.CAUSEY CASA is a statewide organization of local public agencies that provide wastewater Dd.Diablo sanitetion collection,treatment,disposal and water recycling services to millions of Californians. nuu a 25006,CA 4509 Hwy Mti(925 G 94509 rd(9zs)7711400 We understand the project will produce the safest and highest quality water available from F.(925)779-1543 any source—imported or local. The project would take highly treated wastewater,purify it 1.wce Nesuck is to nearly distilled water quality through 100%reverse osmosis,microfiltration and JOMNA.6odki,ud r ultraviolet light treatment with hydrogen peroxide,which creates a reaction that destroys Eon any MuniR 1 p y Utility Dinner emerging contaminants. The water will be percolated through the ground into the Orange 2nd Vice pseidcer County groundwater basis. ROBERTEEID wet Valley sani none n Duena of Sane a. The project will provide the following benefits: County • It will actually improve the overall quality of Orange County's groundwater by DIRECTORSATUROE reducing is salinity. CDARLUMITS . It will produce the safest,highest quality water available using about 50% less c.ntal contra Cwea energy than it takes to import water into Orange County from Northern California and Smiory Conn. ('ladOrO=CRA1'EN the Colorado River. Venom Reginn.I s.ni.don . It will help prevent future seawater intrusion into the groundwater basin as more and Dania more water is pumped out to meet the county's water needs and; NORMANz ECRENRODE . It will lessen the strain on California's Bay Delta.Congo County sanitation Di...its AEFTYISRAEr For these reasons, CASA is pleased to support the Groundwater Replenishment System. Monterey Regiorul Water Pollution Coneral Agene, Sincerely,.: MATTTEBBETISKenned pMchaelF. Dillon ERFCSy/lenbs ConeulunnERICR4PIRSTEINFeder)Lcgirain Adno.eENS Resources•Ine. 1747 Peaserylwnu An..N.W. Suite 420 Washingmn.D.C.20006 cc: CASA Executive Board Tel(202)466-3755 FAX(202)4663787 Blake Anderson, General Manager, Orange County Sanitation District euapoenummnem.cem Virginia Grebbien, General Manager, Orange County Water District (Member Agenda luted on renru) SPATE CA 9 a � COMMIrTEE3 PENTO.O.am AN2 Cr�t�j REyENUE AND TAXATION.VICE CFWR BACRAME6)319- 9i249-0ggT t NATURAL RESOURCES (91a19-2021 'hfnrixttt 1P isltifixrP auolcum FAX(g161319-216] LOCAL GOVERNMENT DISTRICT 0171m GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION 1"11 BEACH BLVD..SUITE SM SELECT COMMInTEE ON HU"NGTON BEACH.CA W617 SCHOOL SAFETY rr14)W496g a .. FAX(716)B°''`'n TOM BARMAN ASSEMBLYMEMBER.SIXTY-SEVENTH OISTRICr March 21,2002 Ron Wildermuth Public Information Officer Orange County Water District P.O. Box 3800 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8300 Dear Mr. Wildermuth, I would like to lend my support to the Groundwater Replenishment System, which is sponsored by the OCWD and the OC Sanitation District. I believe that this project will rroduce safe and high-quality water and will greatly benefit my constituents within the 67' Assembly District. Programs such as this will help Orange County meet the increasing demands for safe, high-quality water in the future. Sincerely, -;&;w TOM HARMAN Assemblyman, 67'h District cc: Glaab and Associates RP MR6CYftd FAWr v � March 26,2002 Mr. Ron Wildermuth Public Information Officer Orange County Water District P.O. Box 8300 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8300 Dear Mr. Wildermuth: . I recently received a presentation about the Groundwater Replenishment System, a new, proposed water purification project sponsored by the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District. 1 understand the project will produce the safest and highest quality water available from any source—imported or local. The nearly distilled water will go through 100%reverse osmosis, microfiltration and ultraviolet disinfection technologies. The water will then go into a seawater intrusion barrier and will percolate through the ground into the vast Orange County groundwater basin. The project will provide the following benefits to all of us in north-central Orange County: • It will actually improve the overall quality of Orange County's groundwater by reducing its salinity. • It will produce the safest,highest quality water available using about 50% less energy than it takes to import water into Orange County from Northern California and the Colorado River. • It will help prevent future seawater intrusion into the groundwater basin as more and more water is pumped out to meet the county's water needs and; • It will lessen the strain on California's Bay Delta. You can count our organization in as a positive supporter of this project. Sincerely, 40 Chip Prather President Orange County Fire Chiefs Association rho PeePM are the Qy 30ARO Aa%n4A Fog MA `f z'z/ 2ooZ Mayor Q-G E'yA Cow dlmemb.- CHRISTOPMERA LOWS Q.� CONSTANCE UNDERHILL NORMAN Z.ECKENRODE City Administrator SCOTT P.BRADY ROBERT D'AMATO JUDY A.DICKINSON ve . ALL,'AMERICA'CITY 401 East Chapman Avenue-P/acenlia, Ca/ilom/a 92870 May 6, 2002 Mr. Blake Anderson, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728 Dear Mr. Blake, On behalf of the City of Placentia. I would like to express my concern regarding the proposed requirement to increase the current level of wastewater treatment. The City of Placentia strongly opposes the secondary treatment of wastewater until scientific proof exists to require such a dramatic change in treatment. Countess surveys and studies have yet to determine that secondary treatment of wastewater will make a substantial difference in ocean water quality. The implementation of a "full secondary' level of wastewater treatment will impact the Orange County Sanitation District with substantial cost increases. These increases will be placed on individual cities and their residents. The City of Placenta could possibly see a $400 to $500 thousand increase in charges for sewer fees. This increase will impact human resource and community service programs, as well as local law enforcement initiatives. Sewer rates could potentially rise as much as 100 percent to satisfy the cost of a multi-million dollar change in treatment. Placentia residents are concerned about preserving the earth's resources and reducing pollution to the environment. However, until secondary treatment is proven necessary through scientific studies, residents are not in favor of dramatic increases to their sewer rates. At this time, a pending Environmental Science Report has not been received, substantiating cost increases and ^r:CIIi<.tiO^,,,. .., .Ja^_ ❑din f'.:.,.,,..,::3fC:treL`tTle.^.r Once again, the City of Placentia strongly discourages any modifications to the current level of wastewater treatment until conclusive evidence determines changes are necessary. The City of Placentia appreciates the opportunity to express its concerns about wastewater treatment. If I can answer any further questions regarding Placentia's position on wastewater treatment I can be reached at 714-993-8117. Sincerely, L Robert D'Amalo City Administrator `0 Hxyded PM 'goA20 AC-W7A f=6�0e2.S OF Fort ' `� 2ir zooL PALMACATHERINE $TAN DIFOPJJ C1W MANAGER Office of the City Manager May 14, 2002 Ms. Penny Kyle Clerk of the Board Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Dear Ms I. Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 2002-22, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Palma, California, Relating to the Discharge of Wastewater into the Ocean by the Orange County Sanitation District which was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on May 7, 2002. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincner A^, Ta . Piswtly Assistant to the City Manager TKP/prt Enclosures (1) Phone 714.690.3333 Fax 714.523.2141 7822 Walker Street • La Palma • California 90623-1771 • www.cityoflapalma.org RESOLUTION NO. 2002-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE LA PALMA CITY COUNCIL RELATING TO THE DISCHARGE OF WASTEWATER INTO THE OCEAN BY THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the intent of the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act is to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the nations waters'; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is a special district that provides wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services to 21 cities with about 2,35 million residents in central, and northern Orange County including the residents and businesses in La Palma, and WHEREAS, the OCSD has been operating under a waiver, known as a 301 (h) waiver, of the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) since 1985, which allows for the release of ocean discharge that contains higher levels of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and greater Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)than otherwise allowed under the CWA; and WHEREAS, the OCSD, as the third largest wastewater agency west of the Mississippi, releases approximately 240 million gallons of wastewater into the ocean each day; and WHEREAS, OCSD is one of only 36 Sanitation Agencies nationwide operating under a 301 (h)waiver for secondary treatment; and WHEREAS, close to 80% of the wastewater comes from residential uses such as sinks, toilets, showers, laundry and dishwashers and 20% from business uses; and WHEREAS, La Palma residents, along with residents throughout Orange County, use the ocean and its beaches for recreational purposes and recognize that taking steps to eliminate potential sources of contamination is an important public health and economic goal for the region; and WHEREAS, beach contamination can, and most probably does, result from a variety of sources, including but not limited to urban runoff, local sewer overflow, ocean wastewater discharges and natural animal sources; and WHEREAS, efforts to determine the relationship between, and relative contribution of all sources of ocean contamination are complicated by various in water temperature, currents, tides,wave action, runoff amounts and numerous other factors; and WHEREAS, a county-wide strategy needs to be employed to address all sources of beach and ocean contamination through source control, management treatment and other means available; and WHEREAS, the health and economic benefits of addressing sources of beach contamination justify public expenditures needed to provide requisite treatment; and ' WHEREAS, the OCSD Is charged with protecting the health and safety of the public and marine life has a proven history of employing the best methods of treatment and technology; WHEREAS, by continuing to demonstrate leadership as a waste treatment agency committed to the preservation of our fragile ecosystems the OCSD advances the goal of encouraging other agencies and municipalities to act in a responsible manner to address the comprehensive challenges that our region faces in assuring our oceans remain clean, healthy and safe environments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the La Palma City Council hereby support OCSD and its Board of Directors in immediately proceeding with planning, design, and implementation of treatment options that would allow the agency to fully comply with the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act, including a schedule for construction of facilities to provide full secondary treatment levels; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the La Palma City Council hereby support's OCSO's efforts to take early actions to disinfect wastewater Flows discharged to the ocean cutfall until further treatment projects can be fully implemented; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the La Palma City Council requests that in conjunction with the above actions, OCSD prepare and adopt a plan of works for facilities to provide full secondary treatment levels, and submit necessary documentation to EPA to eliminate the need for a waiver of full secondary discharge requirements under Section 301 (h) of the Federal Clean Water Act. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of La Palma at a regular meeting held on the 7'day of May 2002. Mayor ATTEST., 3 -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF LA PALMA ) I, TAMI K. PISCOTTY, City Clerk of the City of La Palma, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 71h day of May 2002. and that it was so adopted by called vote as follows: AYES: Aragona, Barnes, Blake, Duke, Walker NOES: None ABSENT: None Cj y le - 3 - Att45 , I d Draft MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, May 8, 2002, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee ofthe Orange County Sanitation District was held on May 8, 2002, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as bllows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Shawn Boyd, Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Mark Leyes Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Roy Moore Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Grace Epperson Maintenance John M. Gullixson Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Mike White, Controller Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst Jim Matte, Safety Supervisor Directors Absent: Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Brian Brady, Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Brian Donahue James W. Silva Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Toby Weissert Randy Fuhrman Doug Korthof Bob Geggie (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Vice Chair Shawn Boyd appointed Norm Eckenrode as the Chair pro tem at the time Director Boo would need to leave the meeting later in the evening. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman spoke to the Committee regarding Lture issues for the District, and Doug Kortholf addressed the Committee about ocean discharge issues. I Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee NLeting Page 2 May 8, 2002 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Vice Chair had no report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson urged the Directors to attend the special Board meeting on Mry 15th at 6:00 p.m. Three reports would be given: (1)Source Control staffs on-shore testing which looked at all potential sources of land-based contributions to the surfzone last summer; (2) Results of the $5.1 million monitoring program byprincipal investigators; and (3)a report from the independent peer review panel. The panel will be discussing their observations, conclusions and findings. An additional special board meeting would also be held on June 19th to discuss the strategic plan, treatment technology options available, financial implications, and public input. With the information discussed at both of these meetings, the Directors should then have sufficient information to make a determination Mather a 301(h)waiver should be pursued at the June 26th regular Board meeting. Mr. Anderson reported a Technical Advisory Committee meeting was held earlier that day regarding the Huntington Beach matter. Ken Theisen, a chief staff member of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, stated that he cannot connect the District's plume to elected bacterial counts in the Huntington Beach area. He is coninced that the source of the bacteria impacting Huntington Beach is a shore-based source or sources. Dr. StanleyGrant of UCI also provided results of the studies he has done at the mouth of the Santa Ana River. He reported that one of the principal sources of high bacteria appears to be from a City of Newport Beach storm drain. Staff will be meeting with the City to discuss and assist them in diverting the flow coming from the highly contaminated storm drain. LAFCO has unanimously recommended approval of Assembly Bill 1892 (Harman Bill). The bill has gone through the Assembly and is now waiting action by the Senate, and is expected to be approved. This bill will give the Sanitation District the discretionaryauthorilyto manage urban runoff. Assembly Bill 1969 (Maddox Bill), which would require the Sanitation District to discharge full secondary treated water to the Pacific Ocean, has moved through its committee of origin late last month but went into suspense on May 1 st. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance, Gary Streed, reported that the District had won the Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The District has also earned the Distinguished Budget Presentation award. The District has won both of these awards for the last five years. Mr. Streed commended Mike White, Controller, on his accomplishments as Xery few agencies earn both awards. Minutes of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Nbeting Page 3 t May 8, 2002 (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, requested the Directors provide input to the General Manager on where the upcoming meet-and-confer closed session items should be placed on the agenda over the next few months. These items are anticipated to take an hour or longer to be presented and discussed. (8) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, reported a Wall Street Journal reporter mould be interviewing various staff members and Directors regarding the Groundvater Replenishment System. The reporter would also be interviewing Orange County Water District staff and Directors. Outreach continues with businesses and leaders in the community. The District participated in the two-day Children's Drinking Water Festival. This event began in 1997 with 3000 students and teachers, and has grown to slightly over 6000 students and teachers this year. It was also reported the District would host an open house on May 18th. The District will also have a booth at the Orange County Fair, which will run July 12 through July28. Ms. Murphy then reported she would be serving on CASA's communications committee. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff reported that a letter was being prepared for Chair Eckenrode's signature that MAl be mailed to the cities relathe to the Maddox Bill, urging the cities to get the Orange County delegation to assist in getting the bill Wthdrawn or defeated. Mr. Woodruff then reported that the State Compensation Insurance Fund, vhich provides workers'compensation insurance for most of the District's outside contractors, has been downgraded from an AM Best Rating Class B VII to a Class B-VII rating. Contract specifications were modified two years ago to allow a variation from AM Best Rating Class A VI I to Class B. Although the reduction tom Class B to B-could be considered a technicality, consideration would need to be given to determine whether an exception should be made or to require the current contractors to switch to an acceptable carrier. The District does not use the State Fund for our workers'compensation coverage. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The Chair ordered that the minutes br March 13, 2002, as revised, and April 10, 2002 minutes for Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting be deemed approved, as mailed. b. FAHR02-37: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2002. C. FAHR02-38: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. d. FAHR02-39: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of April 29, 2002. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Nbeting Page 4 r May 8, 2002 e. FAHR02-40: Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. FAHR02-41: Receive and file report of General Manager approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000 in accordance with Board purchasing policies. g. FAHR02-42: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file the 2001-02 Third Quarter Financial Report br the period ending March 31, 2002. h. FAHR02-43: Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2002 through March 31, 2002. I. FAHR02-44: Recommend to the Board of Directors to renew the District's Boiler& Machinery Insurance Program for the period May 15, 2002 to May 15, 2003,with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $91,696. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through 0) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR02-45: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve SAFETY-POL-104 and 106, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the Districts Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. FAHR02-46 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-18, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-15. Gary Streed reported a revised ordinance was distributed to the Directors that evening. He reviewed the various charges within the proposed ordinance and answered Directors'questions regarding rate structures. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. Directors Gullixson and Leyes opposed. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Maeting ` Page 5 May 8, 2002 C. FAHR02-47 (1) Direct staff to mail Government Finance Officers Association pamphlets entitled, "An Elected Officials Guide to Auditing", and "An Elected Official's Guide to Internal Controls and Fraud Prevention", to active and alternate Directors; and (2) rescind Februaryl3, 2002 direction to staff to schedule a special Directors'workshop regarding audits. Director Gullixson stated it was not healthy to have the same accounting fine perform audits for six continuous years. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to direct staff to mail the pamphlets to Directors; and, Further moved, seconded and duly carried to continue Item 11(c)(2) to the June 120 meeting for further discussion regarding whether or not to request a different firth to perform the District's audit for the following year. d. FAHR02-48 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-_, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for (1) Change the title and pay range of current Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($4,469- $6,324)to Principal Contracts Administrator at payrange El ($5,708 -$8,076); and (2) Create Employee Development Supervisor classification at pay range El 1 ($5,430-$7,683). Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR02-49 2002-03 Joint Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget Update Mike White, Controller, reviewed the three budgets that were prepared for: (1)the current level of treatment; (2)disinfection plus current level of treatment; and, (3) additional secondary treatment plus current level of treatment plus disinfection. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Mbeting Page 6 j May 8, 2002 (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled br June 12, 2002 at 5 p.m. (16) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 7:01 p.m. pursuant to Govemment Code Section 54957.6 to discuss and consider Agenda Item No. 16(a)(1). Confdential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee haze been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There was no reportable action taken bythe Committee re Agenda Item No. 16(a)(1). At 7:06 p.m., the Committee recomened in regular session. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m. Submitted by. A. Penny M. yle FAHR Committee Sec e ry G:1wp.dtMWmin\BSTAHRWW802 draft FAHR Mino .doc BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING May 22, 2002 —6:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file written communication from the City of Seal Beach re appointment of Patricia Campbell for the May 22, 2002 meeting only. GAw dta\agenda\Board Agendas\2002 Board Agendas\052202 supplemenlal.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation i District to be held on —P a-�, , 200; was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 14, 200�. yry ,IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this_ day of 200?— Penny M. Kyle, Secr ry Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District GAWRDTMADMUMFORMSIAGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT t May 15, 2002 plwne: n14)9622411 To the Chair and Members I..; of the Board of Directors p141962.0356 nmm,...ad...m Subject: Board Letter mailing address: Pa B.9127 Po nt.in Valley.C 82728.8127 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional .elY.e oddness information on any of the items, please call me. 10844 Ellis Avenue ,contain Valley.CA 927O8J016 AB 1969(Maddox) Member Assemblyman Ken Maddox's bill that would override the Clean Water Act and the Agenda. California Ocean Plan and remove the Sanitation District Board of Directors 0 discretionary authority to apply for a Clean Water Act Section 301(h) permit is citing currently in the Assembly Appropriations Committee in suspense. Most bills that An.n.lm have a state spending implication have been placed in suspense. The fate of the bill Bra. is unclear at this time. soon.Perk cypress Fountain V.H y AB 1969 is bad law. First, it is special legislation directed only at the Sanitation Fullerton Garden Grove District. Second, it presumes that the 25 members of this body are incapable of Hunangmn e.apn making a deliberative and appropriate decision on behalf of the people of Orange Irvin County. Third, it presumes that the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Le Habra L.Palms and the regional office of EPA are incapable of interpreting the California Ocean Plan Los Alamitos and the federal Clean Water Act and are unable to discern whether the marine Nemport aeon resources and beneficial uses of the ocean are being adequately rotected or not. Orange 9 q Y P Plnc.nd. Fourth, it prejudges the outcome of a $5 million ocean survey and monitoring Santa Ann Sew seach program, the single largest effort of its kind ever conducted. Fifth, it would mean that Beech srenron the legislature would intervene in a highly technical and complex public policy issue Tu.bn that is already addressed by existing law and procedural rules. Sixth, it would add no Ville Perk y.rba Linda additional speed to our resolve to disinfect our effluent—we already have the work fast tracked within the requirements of CEQA. And, last, AB 1969 would set a Qa nt`' of Orange horrible precedence by overturning the orderly process of government. Imagine if every interest group had members of the state legislature working to overturn the senitarg Districts decision-making authority of local policy boards all over the State. Cass Mesa Money City Water Blicruts The Long-Awaited Science,Treatment Technology, Financials, Regulatory Issues and Public Opinion Issues related to Level of Treatment are arriving Irene Punch The May 15 and June 19 Special Board Meetings are designed to give the Board ample information to make an informed decision about what level of treatment it selects (and on which our next discharge permit application will be based). You will have a wide range of choices available for your consideration. The Sanitation District is required to apply for a new ocean discharge permit by the first week of December, 2002, one hundred and eighty days prior to the expiration of our existing five-year To malnMu world-gees leadership in wastewater end water resource management. o q,. Members of the Board Page 2 May 15, 2002 permit, issued in 1998. EPA Region 9 and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board will each evaluate the terms and conditions that we propose and then conduct their own hearings on the matter. Moving the Dairies out of Chino Ain't No Done Deal In the many discussions we have had about the 300,000 dairy animals existing in the Chino Basin, there is an underlying assumption that some day soon they will be gone. And they will probably move to California's Central Valley. Or, may be not. The fact is, moving there will not be easy. It will certainly be difficult and maybe impossible. Local opposition, local ordinances, the California Environmental Quality Act and local judges will make that move difficult. Look at the attached article from the Bakersfield Californian entitled, "Judge shaping legacy with environmental cases" for a glimpse at one of the larger-than-life personalities we have learned to expect to encounter in Kern County. The degree of sophistication, business savvy, and tough- mindedness we have found in the Central Valley is equal to the best of Orange County. Maybe even more so. For this reason, all of the interests in the Santa Ana River Watershed must work together to assure that the competing needs of ample dairy products and ample water quality are adequately supported. The Sanitation District will continue to work cooperatively with the regulatory agencies, water agencies, county government and environmental groups to preserve Orange County's groundwater and surface water— both of which are impacted by urban and agricultural activities of the Inland Empire. Leave Our Community Assets Local! Haven't local revenues been impacted enough? Local government is chronically under-funded and barely has budget room left to provide the essential services that citizens need. The revenue for services that every person in the state uses every day are at risk once again. Services essential to our way of life such as police protection, public parks, fire protection, water and wastewater services are threatened by a gigantic hole ($22 BILLION?!)that State legislators are looking to fill with local revenues. Why take money from local agencies that are responsive to people's needs? The California Special Districts Association (CSDA) has recently joined forces with the League of California Cities(LCC) and the California State Association of Counties (CSAC)to form the "Leave Our Community Assets Local" Coalition. This coalition (LOCAL,for short) has united around the growing imperative to protect local services by protecting local government revenues from being taken to solve the state's budget deficit. 1 e Members of the Board Page 3 May15, 2002 It is important that special districts express themselves in numbers equal to the cities and counties. This will show legislators and the media that all three forms of local government stand united together under a single banner, and the fate of one is the fate of all. For more information regarding the LOCAL Coalition, call toll-free the California Special Districts Association (877)924-CSDA, or visit the Coalition's website: www.calocal.com. See the Coalitions Statement of Principles, attached. Tom Dawes is Leaving as GWRS Project Manager In a letter dated May 9,Tom Dawes, the project manager for the Groundwater Replenishment System, announced he is resigning as GWRS Project Manager. We have received this news with mixed emotions. Certainly for Tom its terrific in that he will have time to spend with his wife, Jeanine, and his three adult children. But for us, the news is sad. Tom's vision and leadership on the Groundwater Replenishment System has been critical to its success to this point. Tom has patiently and clearly maintained a steady course for the single largest water reclamation system in California. More importantly, Tom has a remarkably warm and caring manner that engenders loyalty and confidence in the staff and consultants working on the project. He will be truly missed. Our challenge will be to find a manager with that rare balance of heart and intellect that has made Tom such a true leader. Our very best to you, old friend. News from the Communications Division La Palma On May 7, the City Council of La Palma received information from both OCSD and the DOG in relation to its agenda item about the Ocean Release Permit. The council voted 5 to 0 to pass a resolution to encourage OCSD to move to full secondary treatment. GWRS A reporter from the Wall Street Journal visited OCW D to research the GWRS and see the pilot project. He met with OCW D and OCSD staff and members of the J.C.C. We can expect to see an article in about one month, after the reporter finishes other priority articles and completes his GWRS research. h Members of the Board Page 4 May 15, 2002 OCSD Open House- May 18 Come and join OCSD for a fun filled and educational day at our Open House on Saturday, May 18, from 9 a.m.to 3 p.m. in conjunction with the Orange County Water District and Metropolitan Water District of Orange County. Information booths, displays, activities, Water Cycle, a show by Will & Company and plant tours will provide opportunities for the community to learn more about the importance of wastewater treatment issues in Orange County. A Splashing Success-Children's Water Education Festival May 7-8 OCSD's "Wastewater Survivor"obstacle relay was once again one of the most photographed booths at this annual event. Eighteen school classes of 0 graders from Orange County learned the basic steps of wastewater treatment by carrying buckets of water through the relay course. A total of 7,000 students, teachers and parents attended the Festival held in Irvine. Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If�o 1 'ce dffit ana ' formation on any of the above items, please call me. Blake . Anderson General Manager BPA:jt G 1WP,DTgUOMIMGMIF STO THE SOMPaN5 WBOMD IMEc DO'C Attachments Cbakersfield com MR halt c tftrimt http://www.bakersfield.com/local/story/1010519p-l114389c.htmi Judge shaping legacy with environment cases By KERRY CAVANAUGH, Californian staff writer e-mail: kcavanaugh@bakersfield.com Saturday April 27,2002, 10:36:34 PM Roger Randall's name has been tied to some of the most controversial issues in Kern County. The Marketplace. Safety-Kleen.And, most recently, the Botha dairies. The Kern County Superior Court judge's decisions on those and other issues have helped shaped policy in California as well as local development. His rulings have elated and infuriated folks on opposite sides of issues he's heard. But those who've been in Randall's court say he's nothing if not painstakingly,exactingly fair--even when they believe he's flat wrong. The law that Randall adheres so strictly to is the California Environmental Quality Act,which has spawned numerous complex and contentious legal battles. In Kern, with its mix of agriculture,endangered species and expanding urban development,the law has become very well-known. And Randall is Kem's judge for the debated act. It's a perfect fit for Randall,who said he relishes complex cases. He's also a pro at fending off the inquisitive and occasionally testy folks who want to talk about his pending cases,which is an ethical no-no. "Quickly as you can, you shut them down," Randall. "When you have a case, you don't want to 90 there." Around the courthouse, Randall is regarded as a stickler for punctuality and preparedness, regularly peppering attorneys with questions and playing devil's advocate. He doesn't shy away from hard cases or the tough decisions they require. Setting the bar On Monday,Randall issued his latest ruling on the controversial Borba dairies, securing his reputation as a stickler. The case first came before him shortly after the Kem County Board of Supervisors OK'd cousins George and James Borba's plans to build two dairies with about 28,400 cows in July 2000. One month later,the Center on Race,Poverty and the Environment sued under the act saying the Borbas didn't adequately study the environmental impacts. In May 2001, Randall ruled the Borbas needed to further analyze air and water impacts from their dairies. In fact,he went further and ordered the Borbas to look at how their dairies would add to the cumulative air and water impacts of all dairies in the valley. The Borbas did that. And all parties returned to the courtroom in February. On Monday Randall ordered the Borbm to refigure some dust estimates and study the possibility of reducing the project's herd size. Attorneys involved with the case would not comment on Randall while their case is pending. Meanwhile, as many as 100 planned dairies in the Central Valley are on hold, awaiting Randall's final decision, said J.P. Cativiela, with the Community Alliance for Responsible Environmental Stewardship, a dairy industry group. "The Botha case is being watched by dairymen and communities around the valley to see what it's going to take to build a dairy," he said. Randall's ruling set a high bar for environmental review of dairies,but it wasn't the first case of statewide note he'd handled. In 2000 a case over a small city-- population 22,000 --near Santa Clarita was moved to Randall's courtroom because it was a neutral county.The suit was filed by Ventura County and a handful of environmental groups who charged Newhall Ranch developers conducted an inadequate environmental review and the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved the plan anyway.The record of the case exceeded 60,000 pages. After a two-day hearing packed with environmentalists and attorneys,Randall sent the project back for more study.The most noteworthy part of his ruling required the developer to prove before building that there would be enough water to sustain residents. For planners and developers,the decision signaled a shift in water policy. For environmentalists and"smart growth" advocates the decision was fodder to challenge future developments. Randall's decision also helped spur two state laws passed last year requiring developers to identify their water supply before building. Newhall Ranch's supplemental study is now complete and is expected to go before the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in May and then back to Randall this summer, said Environmental Defense Center attorney John Buse,one of the plaintiffs in the case. Buse said Randall's decision was careful and detailed. - "He felt close to the issue of water supply," Buse speculated. Working with the law Randall would not comment specifically on this or any case for this story. Of his judgments in general,he said,he does not address the merits of whatever projects are under question. That's not what the law asks him to review. The California environmental measure sets out a procedure government agencies have to follow when approving land-use projects. Whether a new dairy or shopping center,officials must evaluate if a project will have a significant environmental impact on its neighbors. If so, the project proponent has to prepare an environmental impact report detailing how it will lessen that impact. People against the project can, and frequently do, sue if they believe the environmental impacts weren't fully studied or the mitigation measures are lacking. When the lawsuit gets to court,the judge specializing in the environmental law simply decides whether the proponents followed the steps of the law,Randall said. But simple is hardly a good description of an environmental law case. The paper trail can quickly add up to several pounds and the issues can be exceedingly complex, involving hydrology,biology and the intricacies of manure decomposition. Judging such a case requires a certain amount of immersion in the language of engineers and endangered species,Randall said. "Every one of these cases is intellectually stimulating," he said. And Randall is known for reading everything. "He is unifomily well-prepared," said J. Martin Robertson, an attorney who has come before , Randall in environmental law and other civil cases representing the Safety-Kleen hazardous waste disposal facility in Buttonwillow. "rve been grilled.If he's got a question,he's going to ask it," Robertson said. Tough cases The environmental act became law in 1970,so it's relatively new compared to criminal or medical malpractice law. That's what makes it so exciting,Randall said. In 1996, Randall volunteered to become the first judge for the environmental law for Kern County. He said it looked like a fairly interesting area of law,one he'd be willing to work with for a while. That year he ruled in favor of southwest Bakersfield residents and stalled The Marketplace shopping center construction, ordering the city of Bakersfield to conduct an environmental review. Six years later,he's still handling environmental law cases. "I knew it was going to be complicated. I knew we'd be dealing with some pretty sophisticated information,"Randall said. For him, that was the draw: tough situations,tough facts and good lawyers. Justice Rebecca Wiseman, who was a Kem County Superior Court judge before moving to the 5th District Court of Appeals in Fresno, has worked side by side with Randall and reviewed his judgments on appeal. In criminal and civil cases,Randall doesn't shy away from tough judgments,she said. "He doesn't hesitate to call them as he sees them." Most environmental cases are controversial well before they reach the courtroom—which means Randall has to be on his guard when friendly chitchat turns to current events. Controversial housing development?Faison?Shopping mall? "If you see controversy brewing, you make sure you don't express your thoughts to anyone," Randall said.Not even family. Proponents pour of lot of money into their projects and the judge's decision can change an economy or a neighborhood. And there's usually public scrutiny of the case and it's judgment. i "It's not that you aren't affected by it,but you keep it at a distance," he said. He doesn't concern himself with public reaction to his decisions. "If you have to worry about that, you ought not be wearing a robe." A career in law Outside of work, the 60-year-old Randall is a back country hiker and enjoys researching his family's lineage. So far he's learned he comes from a long line of European peasants. Randall will probably retire next year, which will allow more time for him and wife Virginia to visit their seven children, who are dispersed throughout the country. Randall began and will end his career in Bakersfield. Along the way he has developed a reputation for starting morning hearings at 8:30 sharp-- a work ritual not all judges follow. Attorney Babak Naficy, with the Environmental Defense Center,said Randall is stern and runs his courtroom like the military. "He's very old-school.There's no room in his courtroom for levity." Naficy was most recently in Randall's courtroom when the judge ruled the state Department of Corrections could go forward with its second prison in Delano. Randall had stalled the prison about a year ago when Friends of the Kangaroo Rat and anti-prison groups sued under the environmental law. He ordered further environmental study and when that was completed to his satisfaction,Randal gave the go-ahead to the 5,000-bed prison. Naficy,who represented Friends of the Kangaroo Rat intends to appeal. But plans for the proposed Delano facility are in jeopardy since a Senate budget subcommittee cut Gov.Gray Davis'bid for funding from its version of the state budget. Comparing Randall's court to the military isn't that far off. Randall did serve in the Army and rather enjoyed the compartmentalized lifestyle of it,he said. He also feels obligated to process as many cases as is efficient and not waste a jury's time. Kern County Superior Court Presiding Judge Arthur Wallace said Randall will take any challenge,juggling tough civil cases and capital murder trials. Randall grew up in Yuba City,north of Sacramento. In high school he considered becoming a Lutheran minister,but decided his talent of persuasion was better suited for law than pastoring. After graduating with a law degree from Yale University,Randall quickly married Virginia, or Ginny, who was a fellow graduate student. He enlisted in the Army,just beating the draft and was assigned to the Presidio. He got out of the Army in 1969. He and Ginny already had two children by that time and he needed to make money, he said.That led him to the Kern County District Attorney's Office, which offered a much higher salary than other prospects. At the time, he and Ginny, figured they'd stay a few years,recharge the bank account and head elsewhere. But Bakersfield had it charms and it was a good place to raise their children,he said. From 1969 to 1973, Randall worked as a prosecutor,with a brief hiatus once when he joined a civil practice,Goldberg, Fisher,Randall &Quirk.That foray lasted six months and he returned to the D.A.'s office when he figured out he'd rarely see the inside of a courtroom in that firm. It was the trial theatrics that drew him to law in the first place. While an undergraduate at the University of the Pacific, he dabbled in speech competition and discovered a talent for thinking on his feet and "working the crowd." Ten years later,in 1983, Gov. George Deukmejian appointed Randall to West Kern County Municipal Court and he was appointed to Superior Court in 1986. Now after more than 30 years in law in Bakersfield, there are few places Randall goes that don't bear the mark of some case he's been involved in, either as attorney or judge. Copyright © 2002, The Bakersfield Californian I Email the Webmaster Privacy Policy Statement I Terms of Use © M © E © LEAVE OUR COtgtUffiT4 ABBETe LOCAL Dediceletl to Protecting Funding for Police,Fire, Health and other Essential LOCAL Servtoes www.calocal.org Statement of Principles Leave our Community Assets Local (LOCAL Coalition) has united around the growing imperative to protect our local services by protecting local government revenues. The LOCAL Coalition will be actively involved in this year's budget process to ensure that funding for essential local services is not compromised. Following are some key principles that will guide the coalition: 1. Essential Local Services Should Not Be Sacrificed to Solve State Budget Problems. Police and fire protection. Emergency medical services. Hospital trauma care. Public health services. Road repair and maintenance. Clean drinking water. Parks. Libraries. Senior Services. These are just a few of the important local services that are provided by local governments in California. But now, these services could be in jeopardy as state lawmakers seek to balance the state budget. Sacrifices will be necessary to help close the budget gap, but our local services have been sacrificed enough. State lawmakers should avoid taking revenues away from the local services we all rely on. 2. Local Taxes and Fees Paid by Local Residents Should Stay in the Community to Fund Local Services. Already, a large portion of taxes paid by local residents is used to fund state-controlled programs. Only a small portion of these revenues is left under local control to fund essential services such as fire, police and health services. These limited, locally controlled revenues should not be diverted to fix the state's budget crisis. 3. Local Governments and Local Revenues are Already Part of the State Budget Solution. Since 1992, the last time the State incurred a major budget deficit, tens of billions of dollars have been diverted from local governments to the state—now totaling nearly $5 Billion annually. Since that time, the funding for essential local services, including police, fire, hospital and public health services, has been stretched thin while demand for these services has Increased. Our local services cannot withstand further cuts. 4. State Government Should Balance the Budget Without Taking More Money Away from Local Communities. The Coalition is opposing measures that would take any more of our local funds away from police, fire, emergency medical and other important local services. The coalition believes the state should balance the budget... ✓ Without cutting essential local services by taking local revenues or shifting revenues from one local government to the other. ✓ Without mandating additional programs or services on local governments without reimbursing them for the costs. ✓ Without imposing more of the financial responsibility on cities, counties or special districts for the cost of programs jointly funded by the state and local governments. Cuts in certain joint programs may be necessary. But the state should avoid any "cost-shifting"that increases the local revenues required. DaW Apri115.2DW Omrige COunN SenIM110n OIBInW Monthly Log of Odor Complaints-2002 _________________________________________________________________ PLANT N0.1 MO Jun 1 JW I Al Ito [1 OptII Nov F DeoTOW: 0 0 PLANT NO.R Jan Feb Mar 1Am 1i M-Y If Jun If Jul 11 Aa I 3a 1 DM d N. 1 D. 6ro J ro ]ro L4 ro an ro pent rNe�M Tml: O 0 0 0 D011ecllOn SElBme y yy yy yy yy y yy Jan 1 g Fab My i Am 1 M 1 Jun 1 Jul Au an, 11 Oct 1 Nov 9 Oec 4 vie 2/1 YL Lfl InB ?/1 Y8 N5 1fY2 ro PN 110 9'a JN] 22 n R5 Ina 1ll9 ro ale a'15 190 rq 'LIB Iq 920 IIOa 1/JO ro T(13 n0 YJ] Multl NW C00.: oW B TaW • TOW 0 T0101 3 TOW TWI TOW Tdel TObI TaW TpW TWW WO:YSHxbll AWxceWWtl mWBor Complaint LOo.tl Inland Empire Utilities Agency Milk Producers Council and Synagro Technologies , Inc . Invites you to the dedication of Regional Plant No. 5 Renewable Energy Facility Please join us as we " Flip the Switch " on the biogas fueled generators that will provide power to the Chino 1 Desalter Monday, June 3, 2002 Lunch and tour will follow 11 a.m. Please RSVP 6905 Kimball Avenue (909) 357-0241 ext. 463 Chino, California l Z �t. i+' 4 --- � -,U,- . C A6 Monday, June 3, 2002, 11 a.m., 6905 Kimball Avenue, Chino, California Map to the Chino 1 DesAter —'e0pnario A.,,on Merrill Ave. C4 i Directions from 60 Kimball Av f 1 Exit Euclid Avenue South on Euclid to Kimball 'r West on Kimball flower: st rm from Ontario Airport p—D e' A Exit airport east to Haven Avenue v.�e South on Haven to 60 freeway Exit Euclid Avenue South on Euclid to Kimball West on Kimball Funding for this project made possible by O ^ NRC SNatural Resources Conservation Service ®!Jg' Other entities participating in project TCCCC- TEr"TEC14,11HIC. aaarru.Inland Empire VIILI E A6 Y• MikS' d.. 14 AnAerobics IIInc So Mats c.,e,rT4le CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES n 926 L Street,Suite 1400•Sacramento,CA 95814•TEL:(916)446.0388—FAR:(916)448-4808•www.ceeaweb.org MJCiii!M F.DlE ON E.ruutivc Din.or ec Lobbyiu April 17, 2002 ROEERTAL.L4RSON Di,e.e,efUpl,.it The Honorable Ken Maddox Regu6mry Alfain Pmldmo -- California State Assembly JEWM.AL4BrANr State Capitol, Room#4153 Sanirary Dune,No.I Sacramento, CA 95814 d Morin County 53 El Panel Drive Gmenb te,CA 949M SUBJECT: AB 1969(MADDOX)RELATING TO ORANGE COUNTY Tel(415)5544316 Fax(415)554-7828 SANITATION DISTRICT—OPPOSE Secmury-Tnoumr PAVE N.CAUSEY Dear Assembly Member Maddox: D.J.Diablo Sa ii.n.t District 2500 PimbuWAtdocli Hwy On behalf of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA),I regret to Aauoch.CA 94509 Tel(925)7784040 inform you that we must oppose your AB 1969,which would require the Orange Fax(925)n9.1543 County Sanitation District(OCSD)to construct full secondary treatment facilities. let vim P-ident CASA is a statewide organization of cities and special districts providing wastewater Jay COEEMAN Eute R collection,treatment,disposal and water recycling services to millions of ast Bay Municipal Utility Dunict Ca1lfOmlanS. 2nd Vim P,.iden, BGBERTREID AB 1969 would override,by legislative fiat,the existing regulatory approval process. Wee,Vdlq Saturation Din,it,arse.Clam Clean Water Act section 301(h)expressly provides that secondary treatment Co.., requirements may be waived for ocean dischargers that can meet stringent criteria. In D/RE=RSATL GE order to obtain a waiver,OCSD must implement a rigorous industrial pretreatment CA14RLES saris program, demonstrate that its discharge complies with water quality standards,and Ce.Swint District show that fish and recreational uses are protected. The District implements an Smicary C..'. P P CAMLOTTECRA3'EN extensive ocean monitoring program to ensure that water quality is not adversely Vensm.Regiaeel St tin,iet affected. OCSD's permit must be reviewed and approved by the Regional Water Di"Ac` Quality Control Board and the United States Environmental Protection Agency,after NORMANZ ECBENRODE consultation with the California Coastal Commission,the U.S. Fish and Wildlife otetge cnnnry smita,mt Cattle, Service, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. These agencies have not yet had .' KUTNISRAEL the opportunity to weigh-in on a renewal of OCSD's waiver. Yet, AB 1969 would Monnrry Regional Woter nullify this regulatory process and mandate a particular treatment technology for a Pollution Control Agenry single discharger, despite the lack of credible data or information to justify such a MA TT TEBBETTS mandate. Kennedy/Jcnb Consulunu ERICSAPJRSrMt Federal Legiel.&v Advomu ENS R.ourt.,Inc. 1'47 Pennsylvania Ave.,N.W. Suite ti'_0 \V'uhingron,D.C.20006 Tel(202)466.3755 F.qX(202)466.3787 :vpEtcmnwurtu.com (Membe,Agencin lined on,we,u) The Honorable Ken Maddox April 17,2002 Page 2 Moreover, AB 1969 would impose a significant unfunded mandate on OCSD's ratepayers.The cost to install full secondary treatment at OCSD's would be over $300 million dollars. OCSD would also consume significantly more energy to operate the plant. OCSD's Board of Directors is seeking public input on whether the District should change its approach to wastewater treatment. Residents of Orange . County should have the opportunity to express their views on whether the District should move forward with full secondary treatment,despite the costs. AB 1969 would short-circuit that local process. AB 1969 is not the way to resolve water quality permitting issues. Individuals and entities are often dissatisfied with some aspect of the permitting process; AB 1969 would set a dangerous precedent by having the Legislature be the arbiter of these technical and scientific issues rather than making use of the mechanisms clearly established in the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act and Clean Water Act. For these reasons,CASA must oppose your AB 1969. Sincerely, Rdberta L.Larson cc: Tom Jones, SWRCB Blake Anderson, General Manager,OCSD �R1tnI lU.FHaszrt IRYMRAM1RATERDIS RICT 15 Sa CmywAro ,P..n. CaWwwSWJ&J -")1S3S9ro•x»whMmm April 18,2002 Honorable Ken Maddox Assemblymember,68ih District State Capitol-Room 4153 Sacramento,CA 95814 Subject: AB 1969(Maddox)Waste discharge requirements; waivers—OPPOSE Dear Assemblymember Maddox: On March 12,2002, Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD)and the City of Irvine met in joint session and approved a resolution that agrees with your intent to increase the level of treatment of Orange County Sanitation District's(OCSD's)ocean discharges. However,we oppose Assembly Bill 1969. The full 25-member Board of Directors of OCSD,which serves 22 million customers over a 470-square-mile service area,will be considering the issue in late 2002. At that time,the Board will decide whether to pursue an extension of its waiver under Section 301(h)of the Clean Water Act,which allows it to continue discharging wastewater to the Pacific Ocean without treating all of it to the"secondary"level. If OCSD does decide to apply for a waiver,its application would then be considered by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and EPA for approval. While this process may be time consuming,it does provide appropriate technical and policy review. We submit that any legislation preempting local government decisions and the normal statutory process for review of 301(h)waiver applications is not necessary. That is why IRWD respectfully opposes AB 1969 at this time. Please feel free to contact Paul Jones, IRWD General Manger, at 949/453-5310,if you have any questions regarding our position. Yours very truly, Brian Brady President cc: Assemblymember Tom Harman,Co-author Chair Hannah-Beth Jackson, Assembly ES &TM Committee Blake Anderson, OCSD,- C ALIFOPMIA PE9UI LDAMEPICA COALITION rPm l4ru urlia C. Yrr.ina.grr,v.x:lA.,rw ai t PA svmyl&(:u4,wrl vu,N Yrn iH.i:ay in .Ya.r.wx�no.a Y�:n nnLM.4>.x;cma May 3,2002 The Honorable Lou Correa California State Assembly State Capitol,Room 6025 Sacramento,CA 95914 Re: Establishment of a California Infrastructure Fund Dear Assemblymember Correa: On behalf of the California Rebuild America Coalition(Ca1RAC),a nonprofit,broad-based organization working w build support for reinvestment in California infrastructure,I wish w convey our strong support for establishmcat of a California Infrastructure Fund within the State's general fund. Dedication of a portion of the general fund to infiastructure is a top priority for our Coalition,whose mission is to build support for dedicated and consistent sources of infrastructure funding. Establishment of an infrastructure fund would go a long way toward decreasing the year-to-year funding uncertainties that impede the long-term planning and implementation ofCalifamia infrastructure construction,maintenance and rehabilitation. As you are well aware,there is an enormous backlog of infiasweture needs in our sate. Decades old public facilities and systems are aging and need repair,and expanded and new systems arc vital to meet the demands of our growing population. Crivw the enormous ivfiaslrucmre needs,it is essential that the sates financing efforts be directed to the highest priorities. We are pleased that the Department of Finance is working to finalize a 5-year capital facilities plan for slate-owned infrastructure,as required under AB 1473. A 5-year capital facilities plan will allow money generated in the California Imfiactructure Fund for state infrastructure projects to be directed where it will be most effective. Laval governments undertake phi miog and priority setting through their capital improvement programs;increasing regional cooperation should assist in directing funds generated for local projects to those that are priorities for the community,the region and the State. We Face*=that this initiative to dedicate funds to infrastructure is all the more difficult given current economic conditions and the resulting budget crunch. That you are considering it now demonstrates an understanding that investment in public infiastmchure-roads,bridges,mass;trarnsit,drinking water and wastewater systems,airports,parks,schools and universities,ports and energy-is a long-term challenge der becomes more difficult with each year we delay addressing it. Moreover,investment in infrastructure is a proven economic stimulus. It crates a significant number ofjobs and generates immediate and sustained economic growth in communities throughout the state. We believe ACA I 1 is a promising menus in establish a dedicated and consistent infrastructure fund and urge the Business and Professions Committee to move it forward on Tuesday. Please let us know how we can be of further assistance to you w you consider dais pmpDW. Our number is 916442-6911 x20. Sincerely, x aa0 Sarah Layton Wallace Executive Vice President GWR SYSTEM EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS COUNTRY OF ORIGIN Manufacturer Allocation of Main GWR System Country Equipment Process Equipment Proposals Cost k Process Pre-qualified USA Non-USA Received Capital Present Manufacturer Worth USFilter/Memcor • (a) • (h) MF Pall/Asahi • (b) • 33 24 Zenon • (c) Hydranautics • (d) (g) RO Koch-Fluid Systems • (a) (g) 54 72 Dow-FilmTec 0 (g) Trojan Technologies • (c) • (i) Calgon Carbon • • UV 13 4 Wedeco 0 Aquionics/Berson • (f) (a) Australian manufacturer, French parent company (b) US supplier, Japanese manufacturer (c) Canadian manufacturer (d) California manufacturer, Japanese parent company (a) California manufacturer, US parent (f) US manufacturer, Dutch parent company (g) Will be selected as part of general construction contract (h) Awarded February 2002 (1) Award pending C?DDCUME-PBANDER-11LOCALS-1\Temp1GWRS EWO MwwW=m dm ' p„�Ias OlBcers PHILIP L ANM y � ' JERRY A.KING Pres L.S ' WES BANNISTER • WIMRYN L.BARR KAMRYN LBARR . First Vice PrssYCeel DENIS R.SILODEAD LAWRENOE P.KRAEMER JR. JM DESAV A S, V.Preslaenl SRN FLORY ON OF INN VIRD�A M BEN BRETT FRANKUN JERRY A.KING MARK IDE Ger,ersl Covlael LAWRE Rvplc OEPKM DGRAN ENERJR. ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ��Wy JANIOE IRV PICNLER May 3, 2002 Naomi L. Castle Castle and Lax Attorneys at Law 1925 Century Park East Suite 210 Los Angeles, CA 90067-2712 Re: Pall's Protest of Orange County Water District's Purchase of Microfiltration Equipment Dear Ms. Castle: This office represents the Orange County Water District in connection with responding to your letter of April 4, 2002, concerning the Orange County Water District's award of a contract to U.S. Filter to pre-purchase microfiltration equipment. INTRODUCTION This contract was awarded on February 6, 2002. U.S. Filter has proceeded to provide the design services specified in the contract, and the design is well underway. The issue is whether the Orange County Water District Board of Directors properly awarded the contract for the equipment purchase to U.S. Filter on February 6, 2002. For the reasons given below, the award to U.S. Filter was proper. NO FORMAL BIDDING REQUIRED UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW There is no California statute or law requiring the Orange County Water District to go through a formal bidding process for the purchase of equipment. A public entity in California is not bound to engage in competitive bidding in the absence of a statutory directive. Moreover, purchase of microfiltration equipment is not a transaction that lends itself to letting a contract to the lowest fixed price proposer or bidder. In fact, it would be undesirable or impossible to advertise for bids on a fixed cost competitive basis for the microfiltration membranes. This is because the three suppliers that qualified to submit proposals all used different, unique systems. The systems involve different structures, P.O.Box 8300,Fountain Valley.CA 92728-SM • 10500 EMS Awme,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Telephone(714)379-32M Fax(714)378-3373 Web Page W W W.a .= Naomi L. Castle May 3,2002 Page Two different membranes, and different warranty lengths, among other things. Under these circumstances, California law would not require competitive bidding even if a statute seemed to require otherwise. Assuming, solely for the purpose of argument that Orange County Water District had to comply with competitive bid requirements on this project, the award to U.S. Filter was still proper for the reasons set forth below: U.S. FILTER'S PROPOSAL WAS RESPONSIVE The fad that there was an issue at all was caused by the fact that U.S. Filter, in addition to providing information required on the proposal form, added additional warranty information. However, this warranty information did not go to the proposal's responsiveness because the proposal documents contained U.S. Filters promise to perform the contract strictly in accord with the Request for Proposal Specifications and its assurance that it would meet the service requirements in the proposal documents. Therefore, it would have been proper for the Orange County Water District staff to ignore this extraneous part of the submittal, and inform U.S. Filter that it was bound by the terms of its proposal without the benefit of the improperly submitted warranty information. The fact that the Orange County Water District insisted that U.S. Filter acknowledge that this extraneous warranty information was of no effect only confirmed that fact. Orange County Water District's staff, in an abundance of caution, initially determined that U.S. Filters proposal was non-responsive and so indicated in some early memorandums. However, in the memorandum that went to the Joint Cooperative Committee on January 28, 2002, and to the Board of Directors of the Orange County Water District on February 6, 2002, staff concluded that U.S. Filters proposal was responsive. ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT'S AWARD WAS NOT IRRATIONAL OR CLEARLY ILLEGAL In order to prevail on a proposal protest, the disappointed proposer must prove that the awarding agency's decision was irrational or clearly illegal. Even where competitive bidding statutes apply, competitive bidding is for the protection of the tax- paying public and not for the benefit and enrichment of the bidders. Even competitive bidding provisions must be construed from a practical perspective, lest the public agency be denied the authority to deal with problems in a sensible, practical way. Here, the Orange County Water District staff and Board acted in a sensible, practical way. The staff determined, and the Board of Directors found, on February 6, 2002 that U.S. Filter's proposal was responsive, and that it would be for the benefit of the public, and fair to the other proposer, Pall, to award the contract to U.S. Filter. Given the fact that U.S. Filter was bound by all of the warranty provisions in the proposal, and that any additional information not allowed or permitted by the proposal was extraneous, this Naomi L. Castle May 3, 2002 Page Three was a rational decision. It was even more rational given the fact that U.S. Filter had acquiesced in the fact that the additional warranty information was not part of its proposal, thus avoiding future litigation with U.S. Filter over this matter. ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PROVIDED A PROCESS TO RESOLVE PALL'S OBJECTION Prior to the award on February 6, 2002, Orange County Water District provided its normal process for resolving protests to bids and proposals. In this case, that normal process was allowing a protester to state its position prior to the time that the contract is awarded. On January 21, 2002, Pall wrote the District a letter informing the District of certain facts that it contended made U.S. Filter's proposal non-responsive. District staff responded to that letter. On January 28, 2002, the Joint Cooperative Committee, a committee consisting of representative of the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District, considered the matter, with Pall representatives present, and determined that the U.S. Filter proposal was responsive. The Committee recommended that the Orange County Water District Board of Directors award the contract to U.S. Filter. Pall representatives had an opportunity to speak at the committee meeting, but did not do so. The Committee's recommendation was forwarded to the Orange County Water District Board of Directors. At that time, Pall submitted a letter to the Board, on the same day that the Board was to consider the matter, February 6, 2002, protesting the award to U.S. Filter. The Board, after considering Pall's letter, and the information provided by the staff, and after giving everyone present an opportunity to speak, awarded the contract to U.S. Filter. Although Pall representatives were present at this meeting of the Board, no one, on behalf of Pall, made any additional comments. Pall representatives could have either presented additional information, or could have asked the Board to delay the award so that Pall could present additional information, but they did not do so. Having failed to present its case before the Board at that time, or to ask for a continuance, Pall waived any rights it had to further protest. CONCLUSION Orange County Water District acted in every way legally and rationally in awarding the equipment purchase contract for the microfiltration equipment to U.S. Filter. Orange County Water District was not required to go to competitive bidding on this project. Even if it were, it proceeded properly. U.S. Filters contract price was over$5 million less for equipment, and approximately$9 million less for life cycle cost. U.S. Filters proposal Naomi L. Castle May 3, 2002 Page Four bound U.S. Filter to fulfill all of the requirements, including the warranty requirements, included in the proposal documents. Any extraneous warranty information was disregarded. The fact that Orange County Water District insisted that U.S. Filter withdraw the extraneous warranty information does not affect this result. This letter is not intended to present all legal arguments that might be presented by the Orange County Water District in any litigation that might result from the award of the contract to U.S. Filter, nor is it intended to respond to all points contained in your letter of April 4, 2002. The District reserves the right to present any and all applicable legal arguments that may be relevant if litigation should result. The District agrees with you that litigation is not the way to resolve this matter, and hopes that this letter, which addresses some of the more important points, will persuade you and your client that litigation would not be productive. Thank you for your letter and for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, ��pp � y 4;6A Clark F. Ida General Counsel CFI/mak cc: Board of Directors - OCWD Virginia Grebbien, General Manager- OCWD Thomas Dawes, GWRS Program Manager- OCWD Michael Markus, Associate General Manager-OCWD William Everest, Associate General Manager-OCWD Board of Directors - OCSD Blake Anderson, General Manager- OCSD Douglas Brown, Esq. -Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth Tom Nixon, Esq. -Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart Brad Hogin, Esq. -Woodruff, Spradlin &Smart Peter Davis, Esq. - U.S. Filter cAd=ment\Bld PmteshResponse 10 Pall's Ur of 4 -02 3oatcu es »ir>- April 24, 2002 To: Board of Directors, OCSD� Fin: Randy T. Fuhrman Re: Effects of Summary Cash Flow Projections(FYs 2002-2012) The fiscal situation over the next decade requires the Board to consider raising the user fees faster than is presently proposed("ramp up" rates sooner). Fees will be over $160/year by the end of this decade, or even $200/year depending on level of treatment, but are raised too slowly to keep up with the CIP projects and other expenses already approved. The lowest cost overall occurs if fees are raised sufficiently to build the projects previously approved without borrowing. To even keep the 50:50 borrow-to-pay ratio will require less borrowing and more pay than in the present projections. Increase the fees to the projected levels quicker so the overall cost to all users is less. Some specific concerns from the Projections are shown below. See other side for projection sheet; reference 4s in ( )s. (9) O&M expenses - shows very little increase for disinfection or increase in secondary treatment to keep 50:50 blend going to the outfall (after GWRS). (18) Annual increases are very small and do NOT appear to keep up with costs. Fees increase by such an insignificant amount in the next five years, putting the District further and further behind fiscal conscientiousness. (11) The cost to payback loans (COP/bonds) increases to almost$100 Million/year, up from S40 Million/year. Property tax revenue goes from currently paying for these loans to paying less than half of the loan servicing costs. User fees will have to make up the shortfall. (4 & 10) Ratios -- Compare CIP and COP until the borrowing stops in 2008-09. The borrow-to-pay ratio goes up 75:25, that is 3:1 not 1:1. If the payback is extended long enough without taking out new loans, then one can always "say' that the 50:50 ratio is met. "' Cumulatively the borrow-to-pay ratio exceeds the 50:50 since it is 67:33 or increases from 1:1 up to 2:1. (14) The only years where revenues exceed requirements are the years that borrowing occurs. Ex. 2002-03 shows $200M revenues over requirements, but borrowed $315M. Cumulatively shows a $45M excess, but have borrowed almost $900M to get there. (22) Over a BILLION dollars of outstanding debt ($1,129,626,000 in 2012). We will have to pay these bills for thirty years. And the fees still have to go up to $160/year (or even $200/yr) with users, the businesses and residential customers, paying more because of the borrowing. Pay more of the building projects up front and borrow less. Attempt to hold to the 50:50 borrow-to-pay ratio by getting the fees increased faster, in a more reasonable timeframe. a0A2D c�rr;:2 May 2002 Board of Directors, OCSD Where should OCSD be in the future? What should OCSD be doing in twenty years? Look to the future. As directors of this organization one function is to look to the future, to be more than caretakers of the present. Think of the OCSD in the long term; OCSD for your children and your grandchildren. Long term thinking puts a perspective on day-to-day affairs and helps us set goals. Biosolids- Costly and ongoing. Class B -) Class A. Trickling filters versus activated sludge. Think long term. Activated sludge treatment makes a better effluent but is more work and more costly overall. Trickling filters are being modernized (24 feet high, less land use) and can achieve the limits needed while producing much less biosolids. Take care of the present and look to the future. Technical Services -lab -Best testing in all of California. Long term,thinking said testing will continue. To improve the process OCSD needs appropriate facilities such as the boat platform for ocean sampling. This is forward looking as well as taking care of the present. Source Control -The system is so good that the discharge allowable limits are met prior to entering the treatment plant. Any lowering of toxics while in the treatment plant is simply a bonus. Current benefit while thinking long term. Deal with things prior to even reaching the treatment facility and get the users involved in the solution. Primary to Advanced Primary treatment- By altering the chemicals used, OCSD has improved the process while costing less. Better process currently but looking to the future since this makes it easier and less costly to increase the level of treatment. GWRS - Reclaiming as much water as possible. We all know that we live in a desert. Sanitation and treatment is better than building costly desalination plants. The Board looks to the future to make a better community by turning wastewater into drinking water, something to be gotten rid of into something that can be used. Financing - Immediate and Long term needs. Maintain reserves both for emergencies and for the high bond rating that means paying a lower rate of interest on loans. Urban Runoff Diversion -AB 1892 and treatment of the dry weather runoff so bacteria levels in the ocean are less. A long term fix for a present and future problem. The Information Technology department is replacing the network with equipment that will be able to be upgraded and used long term. Fixing a current problem with a long term solution. Improve the quality of what is discharged to the ocean. Cleaner oceans for our kids. Fewer bacteria (disinfection), fewer viruses, less solids, less organics, less chemicals All the while increasing reclamation and recycling. This is why I ask the Board members to look long term while taking care of the present. j3o,(�Jzp L�r;'�4Z �aterF a eolnnffient cmP 7 o vo7tsJ PREmaR J..IL twit PE Federation® G Prn-er P&&'b-vig wsemarrou>• Rdm T MrMilbn the Gfo6a14[4uerErsuirorvne,u Mmpa,.n nrF PRrsroarr Lppev AebA6aro.Al PJaa 11 PE L7yer A0 April 26, 2002 E.J.aw aad d'o PW PR sWM Blake Anderson J.C Sbae.J' General Manager `"nrlWe.NC Orange County Sanitation District VXC" "mP'f0R 10844 Ellis Ave. PO Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Blake: I am writing to thank you and your department for generously sharing your expertise in the area of FOG Control with the WEF/EPA Work Group through the work of Nick Arhontes. Nick has been has been instrumental in bringing a collection systems perspective to the group which is made up of mostly pretreatment coordinators. He also did a great job acting as the local host for the workshop in Irvine. I look forward to continuing to work with Nick as we proceed with additional workshops around the country, the development of a FOG Control Training Manual and the dissemination of a national FOG Control survey. We will include an acknowledgement of the work of the Work Group members and their respective employers in each of these. Thank you again for your support of these worthwhile projects. Best Regards, Stacy J? sl5aro�E. Technical & Educational Services Water Environment Federation R c r .. : APR � u 141ia.: . -. .. 601 W1ahe Sv l • Alexandria,A 22314-1994 USA • 1-703484-2400 • I-703.66424921FA* • x�vure�d n 2MMA ORANGE COUNTY CHAPTER 1 The Information Management Prolessionak A uerl,clwl I�eco..(s 1 �,a„� I{SSOCtc/l.o, April 29, 2002 Mr. Greg Matthews Assistant to the General Manager Orange County Sanitation District P O Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Dear Mr. Matthews: On behalf of the Orange County Chapter of ARMA International, we would like to extend our sincere appreciation for OCSD's participation in our Workshop held at your facility on Friday, April 5 and Saturday, April 6, 2002. As always, your facility was beautifully maintained, your staff professional and friendly, and the additional help that you provided to us as we prepared for and presented the Workshop was above and beyond anything that we could have hoped for! We value OCSD's participation in helping us as we promote professional development for employees of both government and private companies in Orange County and beyond. If we can ever extend any service to you, please let us know, as it would be our true pleasure! Thank you again for allowing Orange County ARMA to hold our Workshop and our other functions at your facility. We truly appreciate you! Best regards, tbt2aa.`tAi.e, jv- Barbara D. Volkov, CRM ICRM Liaison/Past-President Advisory Board Barbera D.Vdkm.CRM ICRM Liaman/Past President Advisory Board File Pm.187 W.Orengeffi p Ave..NE,Placentia,CA 92870 714.528.99T •714.528.00740 FAX bvolkov@rlems.com MONTHLY UPDATE ScAto May 2002 A Message from the Executive Director... SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF We need an infomercial. PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS , This moment of lucidity came to me late one night as I lay on the couch watching "Imitation of Life," which I incorrectly assumed was a documentary about the Editor's life. [Editorial Note: Since Mr. Miller considers "Erin Brockovich" to be a documentary masterpiece, I will ignore that remark and just continue my charitable donations to the "Old Engineers who Golf' Fund]. So I'm debating whether to walk (sneak) into the kitchen and Upcoming Meetings partake (snag) one of the most coveted food items on earth: the SOAP Sponsors: Regulating for last brownie-of a particularly stellar brownie production run. Not Success, Working Together to wanting to wake anyone up (get caught), I started to stealthily Solve Environmental Problems move towards the beckoning pastry when my eye was caught by in Los Angeles - Aker the movement on the screen. The movie had ended and I was now successful meeting with Orange gazing at two extremely enthusiastic people in the early steps of County officials, EPA Region IX making a banana split. Administrator Wayne Nastri has agreed to meet with Los Angeles' My attention was riveted on the screen, in that kind of numbed wastewater, water and public fascination you gat when you watch the guy in the barrel get works representatives and listen to closer and closer to Niagara Falls-you don't want to watch, but hot topic concerns. July 22, 2002, you've just gotta watch. 9:30 to Noon at the County of Los Angeles'Alhambra faclllty. A SCAP Why was I so fascinated? Was it the fact that the machine- Alert!will be sent out as details the "La Press," has been used by just about everyone in Europe are finalized. (including Liechtenstein) for years and now was finally available in the United States? Was it the way that it would slice bananas Air Quality Committee: with one plate, and then allow you to chop nuts with the other? Tuesday, May 7, 30-12, LACSD. Was it the special price of$19.95 that was only available if you called within the next 30 minutes, and you could also get the Biosolids Committee and bonus knife set for no additional charge? Water Issues Committee - Joint Tri-TAC/CASA/SCAP Meeting No. My fascination was with the two very, very enthusiastic in Ontario on May 9. people who were gazing with such pride and devotion on the s Meeting - 'or Thursday,small piece of kitchen wizardry that they were using. The only day, June Board of Direct a.m. - Noon, time I had seen a similar look on an adult's face was when a Thurs friend proudly extolled the "poopy" that his son had just presented LACSD to the world for the first time. The woman cradled the La Press in her anus. The man, who was unrelated to the woman, but seemed to know her quite well, was very excited about its capabilities. I personally had a hard time understanding this, but perhaps he was a chef or something. As they talked and demonstrated, I found myself grappling with a strange feeling. At first I was incredulous; I had never felt this way before. As the show went on I felt it growing STRONGER AND STRONGER UNTIL: I reached for the telephone and started to dial 1-800-GOTTA HAVIT. I needed to have the La Press. 30200 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD, SUITE B•SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675 EMAIL: kris0)s=.0CWxmail.wm•PHONE: (949)489-7676• FAX:(949)489-0150 Monthly Update 2 May 2002 Think about it. We have all of these biosolids that we practically can't pay people to take. Our strategy has been all wrong. I say we get a couple of people like those on the infomercial—people who really love the product they are selling. I vote for Biosolids Chair Diane Gilbert and maybe OCSD's Mike Moore. I think it should go something like this: [Fade into studio; wild applause and hooting. Announcers voice: "And here they are: Mike and Dianel"]. Diane: "Mike! I'm so excited to be herel I can't wait to see what you've got for us today!" Mike: "Hi Diane! You're lookin' g0000dl And you are so right! You are going to be blown away with this new productl! Heyl Do you like to garden?!" Diane: "I sure do! Nothing like getting the 'ol fingers into the soil — kind of gets me back in touch with what's reall" Mike: "Real is rightl I've got a product that's so real— so natural— so organic—that you'll feel like it's part of youl" Diane: "Don't keep me in suspense anymore Mike! I can't waitl I know it's going to be something fantastic just by looking at your face!" Mike: "Well, you're just going to have to wait one more minute Diane, 'cause I've got something to show you first!" [Mike goes offstage and reappears with a 15' ficus]. Mike: "Here Diane, this is for you!" Diane: "Well, uh, thanks Mike! But what's the occasion?!" Mike: "Well Diane, do you think this is the most beautiful tree you've ever seen?!" Diane: "Sure do!!" Mike: "What if I told you that I planted the seed for this last Thursday?!" Diane [guffawing as she looks at audience]: "Suuuure Mike! And I've got a bridge in Brooklyn for sale, her, her, her!" Mike: "Really! I just planted it using regular potting soil and this: Les Solids Biologique! Les Solids Biologique is the European secret that has just been released into America! Fanners in Europe have had almost exclusive use of this wonderful formula, but now that the European Union has been formed, the cat's out of the bag!" Diane: "Tell me how it works Mike!" Mike: "Well Diane, through a patented formula that was originally developed by NASA and stolen by the French during their disastrous space program (Les Rockets de Boom), a proprietary mix of vitamins and minerals is combined with carbon material to forth a rich, aromatic loam! Les Solids Biologique contains the perfect mix of nutrients and biologically active ingredients that all plants lovel" Diane: "Very cool! But is it safe?[" Mike: "Is it safe?! Watch! [Mike bites leaf off ficus and chews with excitement]. Yum! And so good for you too!" Diane: "Can I have some?!" Mike: "Chomp away, Diane! There's lots more where that came froml" [Mike turns towards the camera] "That's right! There's lots more and you can have some too. Don't be the last on your block to gel it! Get rid of that weedy, thin lawn! Grow roses that your mother will rave about! Plant that African Violet that you've never been able to grow and stand backl Your yard will look like a jungle! Pick up the phone right now and dial: 1-800-BLACK-GOLDI Our operators are standing by!" [Announcer: "Here's how to order!" Run disclaimer noting that some results may vary.] I'll bet we couldn't keep up with demand! Our coffers would be overflowing with revenue! I've got to stop talking like this and using the ! key! Next, we'll do one on recycled water. I can see it now, we'll use Rich Nagel and Lucia McGovern over at West Basin Municipal Water District—they're fanatics about recycled water and they've got tons of it. Rich: "Lucial Wow! I'm excited!" Lucia: "You should be Richl I'm about to show you something that people have been wanting since the beginning of time: a guaranteed non-stop source of pure water— it takes nothing away from the environment and it can be delivered right to your doorll!ll" Rich: "Wow!" Lucia: "Just think Rich, we could solve the Middle East water problems, stave off famines and bring peace and prosperity to the universe." Rich: "Faaaar Out!!" Monthly Update 3 May 2002 1 think it's got legs [Editorial Note: I assume this is Hollywood talk for"it's a viable project"]. I volunteer to direct. But I want full credit, a percentage of the residuals and my own masseuse. Hey, this is show business! Entertainingly yours, Ray Miller A Year in Review—from Mary Jane Forster Folev It has been nearly a year since I began consulting for SCAP. I am impressed with the level of expertise of all the committees. The Water Issues Committee had a very challenging year. Between the 303(d) lists and EPA's listening sessions on TMDLs, we were extremely busy. We had several meetings with staff from various Regional Boards and the State Water Resources Control Board on the current 303(d) list and the pending 303(d) policy. We made a difference! The 303(d) list has many recommended improvements that are the result of months of advocacy by the Water Issues Committee. There are now two lists proposed, an impaired list and a watch list. The watch list gives the regulated community more time to collect critical information. There are also criteria for de-listings. All the changes were a result of our recommendations. The Water Issues Committee did a thorough effort on critical principals for the upcoming 303(d) listing policy. TMDLs have everyone's attention. We attended the EPA TMDL"Listening Session." We submitted comments on many components of TMDLs. We also sent EPA the 303 listing guidance recommendations that we had sent the State and Regional Boards. We assisted our members when they asked for our participation on hearings concerning TMDLs. We presented testimony at Regional Board meetings on various issues that the Water Issues Committee felt were important for a fair and reasonable regulatory approach. The Biosolids Committee has had an equal amount of challenges this year. While we are awaiting the National Research Council study on biosolids and risks associated with land disposal, the committee worked on exploring alternatives to land application of Class B biosolids. We have been following all the national events related to biosolids and will be reviewing the NRC study and developing comments for EPA prior to any rulemaking or programmatic decisions related to 503 regs and land application of biosolids. We hope to engage the SWRCB and the EPA Region 9 to partner with us on keeping reasonable, affordable alternatives viable. The Air Quality Committee has several items that have taken a lot of energy and dedication. The one I have been the most involved in is the Proposed SCAQMD Rule 1133. When appropriate, I have given testimony to the SCAQMD on the need to be flexible while we are gathering data on whether composting facilities must be completely enclosed. I have worked with the Integrated Waste Management Board members to assist in our position for flexibility. The Air Quality Committee has great technical expertise. My Sacramento experience and relationships can continue to be a great help to the Air Quality Committee, as well as all of SCAP's committees. The Public Outreach Committee is very popular. We share the best of what agencies have developed for the benefit of all the members. We have a popular"help desk"where we brainstorm individual agency's most significant public relations issues. This month Diane Gilbert, from the City of LA Bureau of Sanitation, showcased her Environmental Management System (EMS) approach for biosolids education. Monthly Update 4 May 2002 We have accomplished a great deal this year. We have had one Town Hall meeting with Wayne Nastri, Administrator of EPA Region 9 and we have another one planned in July. We have assisted CASA on AB 2351 to amend the mandatory penalty law, and we were very active in the Vacaville hearings because there were many Mike Hogan and Encina Wastewater statewide policy issues related to the Effluent Dominated Authority Garner awards Waterbodies issue. Encina Wastewater Authority General Next year I propose to be more of a"circuit ride' and will visit Manager Michael Hogan received theArthur Sidney Bedell Award,which is a our members that find it too difficult to make the urban location prestigious award presented by the meetings. I welcome any invitation to come to your Water Environment Federation(WEF)to .neighborhood." I am also available to assist you with any issues Individuals for extraordinary personal you may have with your regional board, other CAL-EPA agencies service to the WEF and the California and EPA. Water Environment Association(CWEA). Mr. Hogan's Involvement in CWEA and Thanks for the opportunity to serve you this year, WEF at the local,state,and national PP ltY Y Y level has spanned over 30 years. He has Mary Jane served as a CWEA President in 1997 and is currently on the WEF Executive Public Relations Committee. The Encina Wastewater Authority SCAP Public Information Workshop a Successi (EWA) recently received two awards for Its outstanding safety program,which The SCAP Public Relations Committee held its second Public were presented during the Annual Information Workshop on April 30, 2002. Representatives from California Water Environment Association thirteen agencies participated in the workshop that covered a (CWEA)Conference held In Sacramento In April. EWA received the CWEA first variety of timely topics. place statewide Plant Safety Award for Medium Size plants(25 -75 employees) Eerie Harding, with Los Angeles County Sanitation District gave and the Water Environment Federation an interesting and humorous presentation on "The Laymanization (WEF)George W. Burke Facility Safety Engineering Guide to Public Education,which was based on his Award in recognition of the excellence of years of experience of communicating with the public on technical Its active and effective safety program issues. Lisa Urabe, with the Encina Wastewater Authority, and safety record. was also ty by recently recognized by the California explained how the agency successfully hosted an Earth Day Fair Sanitation Risk Management Authority on a shoestring budget of$3,600. Diane Gilbert, with the City of (CSRMA)for having the lowest calms Los Angeles, presented the City's public relations plan for frequency rate in the large member biosolids. The City is participating in the National Biosolids agency category for2000-2001. Partnership, which is developing a Biosolids Environmental Management System to assure not only compliance with regulations, but increased public education and awareness. The always-entertaining Lisa Murphy, with Orange County Sanitation District, discussed the lessons learned from the recent continuous media attention that the district has received during the last year. SCAP's own Mary Jane Foley gave an update on several legislative bills that are currently being considered and should be watched. The Workshop ended with several agencies sharing their recent public information publications with the group, which again proved to be a valuable exchange of information. The next workshop is tentatively scheduled for September and will cover a variety of topics, including agencies sharing lessons learned when dealing with the television media. Monthly Update 5 May 2002 If you would like electronic copies of the information presented at the meeting (as available), please contact Linda Jones via email at I ones(Wscap.occoxmail.com or at (949) 489-7676. Water Awareness Month Happenings Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District are teaming up again for their award-winning Open House and Children's Festival in honor of Water Awareness Month. The Festival will be held on Saturday, May 18, 2002, from 9 a.m. - 3 p.m. Fun activities are planned for all age groups: • Tidal Pool Cruiser and Wild Animal Kingdom • Kids games with prizes and other fun activities • Caricature drawings, balloon animals and face painting • Mariachi Band and Karaoke • Educational displays and exhibits • Bulldozers and BIG trucks • Water-efficient garden landscaping demonstration • Information on used oil recycling and stopping urban runoff The Festival will also feature Will & Company's Water Cycle at Orange County Sanitation District and Mad Science at Orange County Water District. Free food and refreshments will be served! Water Issues Los Angeles RWQCB Adopts Freshwater Ammonia Objectives Sharon Green and Beth Bax of LACSD report that the 1999 EPA ammonia objectives were adopted into the Los Angeles Basin Plan for freshwater only. The Board recognized that there were technical and legal reasons for which they couldn't adopt saltwater objectives at this time. This means that the characterization for freshwater/saltwater remains, and will now be a part of the Basin Plan. If water is characterized as saltwater (or as brackish water), these ammonia standards will apply and it is more stringent than the 1999 EPA criteria. 303(d) List Comments Due to SWRCB by May 13 All comments on the proposed revisions to the 303(d) list should be sent the SWRCB by May 13. You may submit comments at the May 30, 2002 hearing in Ontario. Note, if you have new data you want to submit, it is advisable to include it with your comments. If you need help on this, please call Mary Jane Foley @ 949-493-8466 or email her at mifconsulting(a)cox.net. Santa Ana RWQCB Adopts Sanitary Sewer Overflow Regulations Deirdre Hunter from the Orange County Sanitation District reports that on April 26, 2002, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board unanimously passed a permit for OCSD and its member satellite cities and agencies' collection system called the "Orange County Sanitary Sewer System Overflow (SSO) General Waste Discharge Requirements" (WDR). This is the state's first attempt at comprehensively enacting the federal Capacity Management and Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) program, along Monthly Update 6 May 2002 with a Fats Oils and Grease (FOG) program and spill reporting requirements. OCSD is not considered the lead permitee, but does lead a Steering Committee that coordinates with the other co-pernitees. OCSD will be providing co-permitees a template for accomplishing the WDR's tasks. SCAP members will be happy to see that, unlike the draft federal CMOM rule, this permit does contain affirmative defense language for spills that would not have been preventable by the permit provisions or"reasonable" engineering judgment. The adopted permit is on Region 8's website: www.swrcb.r-a.gov/rwgcb8. Model Allows Better Understanding Of Groundwater Contamination IEu,oneae wxwr Mamt Now l How easily metals such as cobalt, copper and lead travel through the environment depends on the compounds they forth in the soil and how these dissolve in water. New work by researchers at the University of California, Davis, and Olin College shows a simple way to work out the stability and solubility of a whole class of clay-like compounds called hydrotalcites. The finding should help geochemists make much better estimates of soil contamination. Hydrotalc@es are layered compounds that form when metals combine with aluminum oxides and hydroxides in the soil. By understanding how easily hydrotalcites form from various metals, scientists can predict how much of the metal stays dissolved in groundwater and how fast it can spread. Hydrotalctites are "garbage bags"with a layered structure that can take up many metals, nitrates and other chemicals, said William Casey, a professor of land, air and water resources at UC Davis and one of the authors of the study. With some further measurements,the model could be used to make predictions about the solubility of a wide range of environmental contaminants, such as chromium, said UC Davis professor Alexandra Navrotsky, an author on the paper. The same methods could also be used to study contamination with radioactive wastes such as carbon, iodine and technetium isotopes, Casey said. The paper is published in the April 26 issue of the journal Science. Air Composting Emissions Testing Study (CETS) Delayed Air Quality Committee Chair Brian Whitaker reports that CETS has experienced some delays due to significant modifications found to be required at the City of Los Angeles' Griffith Park composting site chosen for the testing (including the purchase and installation of new fans). Apparently, even the increase in the percent of biosolids proposed for CETS overtaxes the aeration system currently in use there. The team assembled by CH21VI HILL has been a valuable resource in specifying the required modifications and the LACSD staff(together with good cooperation of the local LA City staff) has borne the brunt of the work necessary to get the modifications completed. Because of these additional requirements, funding for CETS continues to be a challenge. Currently, six member agencies are funding the $150,000 effort that is so important for the future of composting, both within the SCAQMD service area and all of California. At their next meeting, SCAP's Board of Directors will discuss sending out a request to other member agencies for voluntary contributions to assist in this effort. SCAQMD Holds Preliminary Proposed Rule 1133 Hearina As a result of the SCAQMD's preliminary hearing on Proposed Rule 1133 regarding emissions from composting sites, it was good news/bad news. We have been successful in getting SCAQMD to delay Monthly Update 7 May 2002 requirements to retrofit existing plants until more data can be generated from CETS and other studies. On the other hand, SCAQMD is moving forward with requirements for new large composting facilities and it seems an uphill battle to convince the SCAQMD Board to consider anything but full enclosure of most biosolids composting in the longer term. Biosolids Status Report on the Biosolids Land Application Proaram Released Biosolids Chair Diane Gilbert reports that on March 28, the U. S. EPA's Office of Inspector General (OIG) released a status report on the Agency's biosolids land application program. The report was prepared in response to a series of allegations by the National Whistleblower Center in March 2001 concerning EPA's conduct in regard to regulating biosolids. The OIG report focused on specific issues raised by the Center. The issues included: EPA and state biosolids program staff, delegation of the biosolids program to the states, extent to which biosolids are land applied in seven states, responding to and tracking health complaints, risk assessment and pathogen testing concerns, EPA's relationship with a professional association, and public acceptance concerns. The report does not include findings and recommendations but summarizes the issues raised. A full copy of the report can be found on the NBP web site link at hftp://biosolids.policv.net/relatives/23201.13df Agreement reached on Dioxins in Land-Applied Biosolids Case On April 1, 2002, AMSA and other parties agreed to a significant deadline extension for the U. S. EPA to finalize regulations for dioxins in land-applied biosolids. The agreement is in response to a thirteen- year-old lawsuit(Gearhart v. Whitman, Civ. No. 8M266-HO [D. Or.]) over EPA's Clean Water Act sewage sludge regulations. The EPA originally was required to finalize the regulations by December 15, 2001 under the Gearhart Consent Decree. The EPA noted AMSA, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and citizen parties to the Consent Decree that the Agency needed to extend the December deadline because significant new data on dioxins in land-applied biosolids were available. After extensive negotiations, the Joint Stipulation filed with the court allows the EPA to take public comment on the new data, and extends the deadline to October 17, 2003 for EPA to finalize the regulations. A summary of the stipulation and joint agreement can be viewed on the NBP site http://www.biosolids.ora/. Government Accounting Office Report on Dioxin Released On April 26, the Government Accounting Office (GAO) released a report on the "Environmental Health Risks: Information on EPA's Draft Reassessment of Dioxins. GAO-02-515." The GAO report is based on EPA's draft reassessment report that was published In October 2001. The report describes the data EPA used to estimate human dietary exposure to dioxins in the U.S.; how EPA's reassessment objectives, processes, analytical methods, and conclusions on the health risks posed by dioxins compare with those of the World Health Organization (WHO), and the extent to which the draft dioxin reassessment reflects the views of independent peer review panels that reviewed key aspects of the reassessment. A major difference in EPA's and WHO's assessments concerns whether there are threshold levels below which exposure to dioxins would pose a negligible risk of cancer. While EPA assumed there is no safe threshold level for cancer effects, WHO assumed there is. EPA plans to issue its comprehensive reassessment report on the health risks of dioxin later in 2002. EPA plans to use its reassessment of the risks posed by dioxins to develop a risk management strategy to address the health risks identified and to determine Monthly Update 8 May 2002 whether the nation's current air, water, and hazardous waste cleanup programs need to be changed to protect the public health. Visit: htto://www.gao.gov/cqi-bin/getrot?GAO-02-515 to view the full GAO report. Legislative Update AB 2351 Canciamilla. This bill makes some necessary improvements to the mandatory minimum penalty law (SB 709). Every member should be supporting this bill. If you need a sample letter of support, contact Linda Jones at SCAP (949) 489-7676 or via email at Iionesescao.occoxmail.com. AB 2185 Chavez, Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. This bill would provide for 3 local public officials to be appointed to the Board. It requires local public entities to appoint members to the Board. The bill is supported by several LA local governmental agencies. Amendments have been introduced. SS 1949 Soto. The purpose of this bill is to increase the ability of the public to communicate with staff members and a state or regional board member and have disclosure forms for the propose of reporting, much like other boards and commissions. It is more difficult to communicate with the state and regional board than any other board or commission and this bill may improve the opportunity for increased communication. Many members are supporting this bill. AB 2479 Jackson. This bill is not favored by many of our members because it is very difficult to comply with all of its elements in a timely manner. There is another more reasonable bill being developed that will be a more pragmatic way of dealing with chemicals used by industry. AB 2938 Simitfan. The State Board is going to raise fees. This would put a cap on the annual fee to not exceed $25,000 and would authorize them to adjust those fees, not more than annually, to reflect the cost of living increases or decreases. Members have a "watch" position. SB 2050 Sher. This bill is about the percent of money that should be used from penalties under the Safe Drinking Water Act or the Clean Water Act. The amount for a supplemental environmental project would not exceed 50% of the full penalty. This is another"watch" bill. AB 2356 Keeley. This bill is related to the use of clopyralid and other herbicides that end up in composting operations. Mary Jane Foley has been communicating with Paul Helliker, Director of Pesticide Regulation, on the need to protect the wastewater interests in their composting operations. He is working with the manufacturers to replace these chemicals with safer products. AB 2221. This would allow civil action to be taken against anyone operating machinery, equipment, etc. without a permit. It authorizes any person to commence civil action against a district that has failed to perform any act required by state air pollution laws. This is like the water side "third party law suits." Non Sequitur ,,More words are said for the sake of argument than for the sake of agreement." -unknown Biosolids found to pose 'negligible risk" Today, thousands of municipalities are land applying The Pennsylvania departments of Environmental Pratt. or otherwise recycling biosolids.Those communities tion and Health investigated Behuris death and confirmed an producing an estimated 8 million dry tons a day of that Behun died of an infection caused by a pathogen biosolids chat are managed according to federal and state common in the environment but not known to be found in standards.Nevertheless,the beneficial use of biosolids,as biosolids.Officials also ruled out a link between the patho- described in EPNs Title 40,Part 503 regulation,has been gen and the field where biosolids had been applied. the focus of contentious debate over the past few years. In addition to the court cases, the National Institute Local government officials in California, New England, of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) issued the Pennsylvania,Virginia and other areas of the country who Hazard ID(HID-10)report on July 28,2000. It raised con- must decide whether to allow biosolids facilities in their cams that biosolids posed a risk to wastewater treatment communities have fielded a number of complaints from plant workers in LeSourdesville, Ohio, exposed to patho- critics. A prominent court case,bans and restrictive onli- gens from contact and through the air.Some of the work. Ounces have generated a rash of media attention,much of an at the plant claimed symptoms of gastroenceritis,which is deemed by the biosolids industry, EPA and the Alexan. are similar to those associated with infections caused by dria, Va:based Water Environment Federation (WEF) to common bacteria. However, NIOSH stated it was unable be fraught with scientific inaccuracy. to attribute those symptoms to biosolids exposure. The At issue are the potential health effects of exposure in Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention biosolids facilities and operations. Some detractors have and NIOSH are re-evaluating HID-10. alleged that biosolids exposure Regulations governing bio- potentially causes illness among solids management have been humans and can lead to respi- I revised and modified to ensure story,gastrointestinal and other I the information is up to date. health effects. Some also have Development of risk-based rules alleged that deaths can be linked included a precedenmetting to the land application of - review Of extensive university biosolids. - and field data by scientists To validate the safety of biosol. independent of EPA. At EPPs ids, local officials need the best request, the Washington, D.C.- information available on the sci- based National Academy of Sci- ence of those materials and safe A number of communities use biosolids as a ence(N.AS)is reviewing current management practices for land nutrient-rich soil amendment,freeing up landfill biosolids management practices application and other uses. The space and cutting fertilizer costs. to determine any need to update settlement in January of a court or otherwise revisit the 503 regu- case in New Hampshire and results of an investigation by lations.An earlier NAS-National Research Council evidw the Pennsylvania departments of Environmental Protection ation in 1996 found that the use of biosolids on food crops and Health provide evidence that claims of adverse health posed'Yncgligible risk"to human health. effects from biosolids exposure lack a scientific basis. While,the debate continues,EPA and WEF make a com- In New Hampshire, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of pelting case for biosolids recycling. Biosolids help local Shayne Conner, who died in 1993 after Class B biosolids govemments meet the challenge of managing wastewater were applied to a field near his home. The plaintiffs key treatment residuals while providing a nutrient-rich fertil- expern David Lewis, an EPA microbiologist, alleged that izer. Other benefits include cost savings to communities; the individual's death was linked with airborne exposure to increased crop yields; strip mine reclamation uses; and an unidentified pathogen. reduced erosion and leaching of treated soils. 6 In Pennsylvanna, Tony Behun died in 1994 after alleg. edly traveling through a field on which biosolids had been This article was written by Robert O'Detre, vice president, applied. Lewis theorized that biosolids exposure led to an government relations, compliance and technical services, for infection that resulted in Behun's death. Houston-based Synagro Technologies. He also is a member In both cases, biosolids were vindicated. Though the of the steering committee of the National Biosolids Parmer. court was unable to pinpoint the cause of Conner's death, ship.The Alexandria,Vic-based National Biosolids Partnership the New Hampshire Acting Chief Medical Examiner ruled (NBP) has developed an envronmenral management system out biosolids as a factor.As part of the case's settlement,the (EMS) that provides loco]governments with voluntary price, plaintiffs stated that the science Lewis used failed to show dures for demonsmiring environmental performance and best that the land-applied biosolids caused or contributed to the management practices. For mare on the EMS,visit the NBP's fatality. Web site at www.biosolids.nrg. 24 April 2002 AMERICAN CITY sr COUNTY Many ideas, but little time left for waste agencies 8Y ADRIANA CNAVIRA e// gro Composting Co. of Callfor- $45 million plant at Lamb Can- them because ofit.In March,the rnr•-PRESS ENTERPRISE ♦ M nia's existing plant that is south yon,where it could increase its supervisors put a hold on Syna. What will the Inland Empire of Corona to the Lamb Canyon intake of sludge from 500 to 800 gro's plan tomovetothecoanty- do with Its sewage? Landfill near Beaumont.Anoth. tons a day. owned Lamb Canyon Landfill, it's a question wastewater er regional processing plant, The company's Temescal saying they prefer to have the agencies and cities from the which would take in sewage Canyon operation, once Isolat- region's various Wastewater Coachella Valley to Lake Elsi- from Orange County, Is being ed,is now surrounded by homes agencies take charge of the nore are scrambling to answer. planned In Colton. and controversy. Residents problem and come up with a The Inland area's only region- "A lot of folks don't under- Want the plant shut down,say- plan for Lamb Canyon by May al sludge treatment plant is ex. stand what happens to their Ing it smells bad and is hazard. 14. petted to close soon, and local waste once they flush," said ous to theirbealth.People living If the deadline is not met,the agencies have been told to come Elizabeth Ostolch, spokeswom- near Lamb Canyon, however, supervisorscoutdgivetheagen- up with somewhere else to take an for Synagro. have said they don't Want the else more time. Or, they could their partially treated biosolids. Faeinga deadline Kant near them either. head back to court to defend the Some are devising ways to Riverside County supervisors county against the lawsuit care the sludge Into electricity. Synagro Wants to move its op. have restrlctedlSynagro's oper- Synagro filed in 1999 chat- "thers propose :.loving Synn- eration to a partially inclosed, ations and tho company sued FLEASESEEWA9rr,111 SYNAGROSLUDGE Agencies that use the i'emescal Canyon plant and the tens of sludge they seret there from September 2000 to August 2001: Bannin8 Munldpnl Water District ........................... lot Bunts,Waage Industries Ino. ............................ 8.9us Chino aaale .... ...........I.........................y.MR Corono ... . ........................................9919" Coachella Valley water District ...........................0,M Defect not springs ........... ...........................11 Eastern Munidpal Water Dblrlo .........................10,I08 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District .....................8afl Waanrn Rlvenids Caunty Regional W.anvn aer Aulhntlly ......... 1.02 Ica Augelea Cnunty Sanitanan District... ...................42,701 Various nrnnge Caunty districts .. . .. . . . . ... . . .. . . ... .....SUED SORuf9:MVWMW t0uM1y 01/MDINU 0s amRnRMWAL RERUN IRE p11e1I11fWM11 W 1 C�rftf� Keeping it small or away AS L Temescal Canyon residents m1NTORIRD FROM 91 have told county officials they lenging county-Imposed re- prefer that wastewater treat. strictions at Its Temescal Can. menl plants scattered through. yon site, said Joseph Rank, a out the Inland Empire deal with lawyer for the county their own sludge, which would Most agencies say they won't eliminate the need for a region- Bl ty j" a tU be able to meet the deadline. al operation. A BEAUMONT They are walling for reports de- Synagro officials argue that - - '*• N d Ose Pr0 tailing the alternatives and the would Just create small sewage , `, p n costs involved. sludge composting plants seal. + Y""�. slud a site "We're talking about big tered throughout both counties. O+rgo El a bucks, so you want to under- They added that many agencies f 4PF (fultO j n stand what your options are," don't have much available land APrF p, . -, Ra 9 said Tom Levy,general manag- to place mounds of human (_., r (,aka er and chief engineer for the waste. is C Wwwn -'a'� ONA a nRd Coachella Valley Water Dis- "If we close,the agencies will (OR kq. tri(l. be up the creek;' Ostolch said. A source of power? "Outlying facilities don't have -- --� ,, + Fz the capacity to take our custom- P6 The Eastern Municipal Water ere." w SAW JACINK) o R Inland Empire Composting Syria ro District, serving Hemet, More. 1' g no Valley,Temecula and Perris, Inc., whose greenwaste opera. sludge site IS Interested In teaming up with tion in Colton was shut down Goya iRe N Riverside Public Utilities and last month for taking in plastic- n UC Riverside's Center for Envi. laden pulp,is proposing to add a ronmental Research and Tech. 72-acre, enclosed sewage is llutaRnso nology to turn sludge and lawn sludge plant — an operation t _ S+NBfANAAMNotO clippings into diesel fuel and similar to S na ro's plans for electricity. The project is ex. Lamb Canyon.As proposed,the / ( emsuot� t I sat pected to be operating In 2004. Colton plant would take in GRAIL Y4F1a GRAIL RMASIOf(D. The process would use high sludge from the Orange County st ARM N AAG PAw temperatures and pressure to Sanitation District and other SIM THE.PRESS ENTr,RPR1SF. harness gases forfuelsynlhesis agencies,much like Synagro. or to generate power. The dis ,lust like in the Temescal Can. tricCa daily output of 130 tons of you and Beaumont areas, rest- sludge could produce 1,092 got. dents in Colton have spoken out Ions of synthetic diesel fuel and against the proposed plant. generate up to 34 megawatts of Temescal Canyon residents electricity per day,researchers have had some success. After said. complaining for years about the The city of Corona is also look- composting plant near their ing at turning sludge Into PDw- homes, some sued Synagro in er. small claims court and were Last year, Corona announced awarded$1,000 each last year. plans to build a t,37 million cm "We need to put this where generation power plant at one there are no people."Raid Dave of Its wastewater treatment Andrews, who owns a restau. plants. The methane from 72 rant near the lamb Canyon tons of sludge would be con- Landfill."Everywhere that Syn- verted into 23 megawatts of Rgro Is at, people don't want it electricity every day.The plant there.They need to move it out Is scheduled to be in operation of the county or Into an area by 2014. that's uninhabited." City appeals decision by coast panel FRIDAY on sewage May10,2002 Commerce.Dept. will be 0 asked to overturn ruling THE By Terry Rodgers STAFF WRITER The city of San Diego yesterday ap- pealed a ruling by the state Coastal Coon- mission that blocked the city's attempt in - renevv a waiver from more stringent sew- age treatment Voting m closed session, the City Council agreed to ask the U.S. Depart- ment of Commerce to overturn the com, mission's ruling that the five-year waiver is not consistent with state coastal protec- bons. The unexpected ruling shocked city officials and was condemned by Gov. Gray Davis top environmental officials, who contend the coastal agency overstep ped its authority. San Diego Mayor Dick Murphy said the appeal is necessary to preserve the city's option to renew its waiver from Secondary treatment requirements of the federal Clean Water Act "We're doing it to reverse what we think is an irresponsible decision by the Coastal Commission,"Murphy said. San Diego Spent $1 billion over the past decade constructing-smte�oftlwart reclaimed water facilities and upgrading its Point Loma sewage plant To reduce sewage spills,which are unrelated to the waiver,the city intends to spend an equiv- alent amount over the next decade to SEE Sewage,B4' ►SEWAGE evidence the 175 million gal- two Years to resolve. Coastal suspended microscopic solids CONTINUED FROM PAGEm lons of treated sewage being Commission officials said. and organic material that ab� discharged each day is harm- The city will beallowed to sorbs oxygen in waters where it Time of appeal urg the ocean,Murphysaid. continue with its current meth is discharged. "We might not to be required oil of treatment while the ap Under the waiver,San Diego may range from to spend billions of dollars un. peals are pending, said Alexis is allowed to use an advanced less we need to do so to protect Straus,an official with the U.S. primary method and remove 60 months to years the ocean environment, he Environmental Protection percent of total suspended IRA- said. Agency,which has the final say ids and 58 replace and upgrade iver. its anti- Envirommenrallsts say there over the wa . .percent of oxygen quoted sewer pipes.. may be impacts to the ocean- Since 1993, the city has dis depleting waste. "If we lose this appeal, the that aren't being detected.Sew- charged advanced primary Advanced primary also m money we were going te spend 'age dischargers do not monitor treated sewage 41h miles off moves slightlyless bacteria and on upgrading the., pipes will for the presence of viruses or Point Loma in 310 feet of water. disease-causiag pathogens have to be spent on the treat- other disease-causing patho- Nationwide, more than than secondary treatment ment system,"Murphy said. gens near then outfa ls. 16,000 cities and sewage agen- Further upgrades to the Appeals to the Commerce cies use the secondary treat- city's treatment system aren't Department have taken any- ment method,which removes a Tarty RodWs:(619)542,4566; mebani eyuu.m,-nuune crop.er v OPINION Clearing the air on clean water By Dick Murphy and Scott Peters We all want clean water.We all deserve clean water.Our lives,our health,our environ- ment and our economy depend on clean water. Tlut is why the city of San Diego - filed an appeal this week to recent de- cisions by the California Coastal Com- mission and will be doing the same to the Regional Water Quality Control Board.We befieye the welMmen- - tionpd attempts by the Coastal Com- missionand the regional board to have less pollution will,in fact cause John 0o,"Yrr routine pollution.Let us explain. The city provided 10years ofmoni- to a modified pemdt as a" giver,"sug- beaches. Loring data to the regulatory agencies gesting anescape clause or loophole. Upon taking office we formed the for review.The Environments)Protec In fact a'modified permit,as allowed Clean Water Task Force,which set an tion Agency,the regional board staff, by the Clean WaterAc,is in complete aggressive goal to reduce beach do, the Coastal Commission staff and even compliance with the act and assures suresby50percentby2004.Wehave scientists at Scripps Institution of that the discharge receives full treat- already passed a difficult but neoes- Ocranography all agree fast them is mental a level that protects the envi- sary sewer raw inaeaseto pay for crit- ap indication that the Point Lane dis ronment ical repairs to the sewer collection sya chagesare harming kelp,fish and With amodifed pewit the city tem.In our first year alone,sewer .people or causimgbeach closures.to must conduct constant monitoring of spills have been cut dramatically and fact aScripp�ss�dentist describes our the ocean environmentllte monitor- our stormwater pollution prevention monitoriggprogram as"one of the ing data are regularly reviewed by program has scored an impreg$ve36 most stringent environmental monj- highly trained scientists and federal percent reduction in the number of Loring programs in the world"The regulators who must determine that beach postings and closures.bonica4 EPAegreesand has mconmumded the discharge causes no harm to the ly,accepting the Coastal Comtrps, thw the 1W&beprardedaam five- ocean. sion's action would shift resources year permit at current discharge lima Overbtltkion has been spent in awnyfrbnithe successful efforts Ova its. the last decade to provide waste water are cleaning up our beaches and bays. Contrarytothe recommendations treatment capacity for the next 25 The San Diego City Council bet of EPAand regional board scientists,. years.If the regional board's decision made the difficult decisions toup- and the Coastal Commission'sown to lower emission limits stands,it will grade our intrasnucturewhim there is staff,the Coastal Commission recently force the city to build new facilities a demonstrated benefit We ranmot refused tamsew the city of San Die- sooner than planned,thereby wasting however,further burden ratepayers goo opem*g.per2t fp*e Metro- millions of dollars of ratepayers'in- with additional'incr'ease;without any politm Wastewater Plant at vestment This is like moving out of scientific evidence that discharges Point Loma your house after 10 years while you from Point Loma are harmful.Accord- Two days later,the regional board are still paying a 30 year mortgage. ingty,wehaveresubmittedourorigi- approvedthepermitbutrequiredthat you would only do this when there is a nal application to the Coastal Commis reductions be made on the amount of (mown threat and there was no alter- sion,and have appealed the regional annual emissions that could be dis- native. board's derision to the state Water Re- charged through Point Lomas ocean - The Coastal Commission decision sources Control Board.We are gmti- outfall. also could require the city to rebuild fled that the entire San Diego legisla The federal Clean Water Act re- the Point Loma plant to provide sec tive delegation,Gov.Gray Davis and quires treatment plants to obtain a per- ondary treatment at an estimated cost his Resource Agency secretary:Mary miteveryfiveyearainordertodis, of$3 billion.Either option would m Nichols,support our position. change treated sewage into public quire enormous increases in sewer We respect the Coastal Conunis- waters.Because Point Loma treats rates,to be home not just by San Die- sion and the regional board and have sewage to"advanced prvnary'instead go residents,but also by residents of had good working relationships with of"secondary"treatment levels,we the county and the 10 other cities pro- both agencies,but we cannot accept have what is termed a,'mo�)ed';pery perial Beach,Coronado,ChulaVsta, then decisions on this issue.-Ibe city mil Unfortunately,some people refer National City,Lemon Grove,L Mesa, is entitled to the permitrecommended El Cajoq Santee,Del Marand Poway) by the EPAbecause it complies with Mwid ,me*of San 1)1"0 and Alas,a that rely on our system.Remarkably, the law,is protective of the enviroo- member of the San Dlrpo Coy Council,are neither option would improve ocean men,is fiscally prudent and is based City again fights for exemption to dump its sewage Page 1 of 3 SignOn4opD8 • _ .eom� �% $otoX Have You Ever Wondcrctl... Txc sex oiEmuxnx.rsieux[ Have You Ever Wished.., d Advertising Into About us Newsletters sa€L Qe Pr'vacv Palicv Sunday NeWs City again fights for exemption to dump » Local News » Insight its sewage Business sports Sunday currents Coastal Commission denial rechurns decades-old issue Arts Travel By Philip J. LeVelle Home STAFF WRITER Homescape Books May 12,2002 Passport The Last Week Sunday San Diego dumps its treated sewage into an underwater trench 4.5 Monday miles at sea—but the stuff has a Way of coming back,figuratively,like Tuesday a recurring political nightmare. Wednesday Thursday These days,the nightmare for City Hall takes the form of the Friday California Coastal Commission,which in April denied the city's Saturday request for another five-year exemption from the strictest federal sewage treatment standards. Subscribe to the LIT A few years ago,the nightmare came from the U.S.Environmental UIIIOR=p tlbURf. Protection Agency,which is taking the city's side today. As it has for decades,San Diego again faces the prospect of being forced to spend billions to upgrade its sewage treatment program. How did San Diego get into this situation? To answer this question,go back three decades to former Mayor Pete Wilson's first term. He was elected in 1971.The next year,Congress passed the Clean Water Act.It required U.S.cities to upgrade their yR.` sewage to"secondary treatment" I "We consulted the scientists at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography,"recalled Wilson,the first San Diego mayor to grapple r e with federal officials on the waiver issue,and they concluded,"It would be a very stupid thing to do." The law,they said,was designed for cities that dump sewage into enclosed waterways,like bays and lakes. In fact,the scientists showed that the treated sewage acts more as a http://www.uniontrib.com/news/uniontrib/sun/metro/news_Im 12sewage.html 5/14/2002 City again fights for exemption to dump its sewage Page 2 of 3 nutrient on the seabed than a pollutant,although today some rI environmentalists say the city's"advanced primary"treatment does not remove as much bacteria or oxygen-absorbing organic material as it should. Cities had to comply with the new law by 1977.In the late 1970s,at Wilson's urging,Congress agreed to allow waivers for cities that discharge sewage at sea. , In 1g81,the EPA tentatively granted a 5-year waiver to San Diego;but Tin I j t in 1986,the agency tentatively denied the city's bid for an extension. The next year,the City Council,led by Mayor Maureen O'Connor, voted 7-1 to go to secondary treatment and abandon all waiver attempts.Many observers identify this as the exact point where the city blundered. Then-city manager John Lockwood said at the time that seeking a waiver was the only hope of avoiding a federal lawsuit.O'Connor disagreed,acting on assurances of an EPA regional administrator that the agency would help pay for a new system. "It's my political judgment,"she said at the time,"that our chances of getting a waiver are slim to none." "I was more than unhappy,"said Wilson,who,by that time,was a U.S. senator."I thought it made no sense,and as fond as I am of Maureen, I told her so." History would prove O'Connor wrong.She declined to be interviewed for this story. The city would get its waiver,years later.But first,it would have to battle the EPA,which sued the city in federal court 16 months after the council vote. Eventually,the city and the federal government settled,and San Diego's waiver status was made law through the Ocean Pollution Reduction Act,passed in the final hours of the congressional session Of 1993• This law was sponsored by Rep.Bob Filner,D-San Diego,a former councilman and a convert to the city's position,who became an unlikely ally of former Councilman Bruce Henderson.Neither was on the council for the 1987 vote. That vote was"why I ran for council,"said Henderson,better-known today as a high-profile opponent of the Padres ballpark project."I couldn't believe what happened.They just thumbed their nose at the Scripps scientists." Henderson made sewage his signature issue,giving the scientists a hitp://www.uniontrib.com/news/uniontrib/sun/metro/news_1 in 12sewage.html 5/14/2002 City again fights for exemption to dump its sewage Page 3 of 3 political forum;meantime,Filner read up on the science himself,then teamed up with Henderson. It was a strange political marriage—the showboating Henderson,a Republican who would make his case while dressed as Paul Revere, and Filner,a scrappy Democrat and leader of the"Gang of Five" council majority that battled O'Connor on many issues. "That was the key,by the way,"Filner recalled."All of a sudden,two wild-eyed people—a Republican who was seen as anti-environmental and a Democrat who was seen as pro-environmental—were working together.We were able to put together the coalition that eventually prevailed." Today s drama flows from a component of the law Filner sponsored.It requires—"quite rightfully,"said Henderson—that the city apply for a waiver,based on meeting certain treatment standards,every five years. But the Coastal Commission,irritated by a spate of sewage-generated pollution off Los Angeles and Orange counties,voted 6-1 in April against San Diego's waiver request. "It looks to me,"Wilson said,"like you've got a group of commissioners who are engaging in a symbolic gesture that makes no sense in terms of the scientific technical aspects"of the issue. Thursday,the City Council voted to appeal the commission's ruling to the U.S.Department of Commerce.Without the exemption,San Diego would have to go to secondary treatment,which Mayor Dick Murphy said would cost"billions of dollars." The city has powerful allies.The secretaries of the state Environmental Protection Agency and the state Resources Agency wrote that the commission committed a"serious error"and overstepped its authority. Time will tell;Commerce Department appeals typically take several months to two years to resolve,officials say. Copyrlght 2002 Union-Tribune Pubashing Co. Site Index I Contact Simon I Mads.mm I About SlanOn I Advertise on Simon I Make SlanOn your homeoeae About Me Union-Tribune I ntart the Union-Tribune ®Copyright 2002 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. http://www.unionUib.com/news/uniontrib/sun/metro/news—lm l2sewage.html 5/14/2002 i AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 - www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING May 22, 2002—6:30 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com, Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 4. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. 05/22/02 ' Page 2 a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Director, and Doug Johnson, Johnson &Associates consultant, re Classification and Compensation Study Results (Government Code Section 54957.6) 2. Confer with Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Director, re Classification and Compensation Study implementation for Manager Group (Government Code Section 54957.6). 3. Confer with General Counsel re Pall Corporation v. Orange County Sanitation District,at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 2CC06622 (Government Code Section 54956.9). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the spec item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boar! of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. Open nominations for Chair of the Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June Board Meeting). 8. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the regular meeting held on April 24, 2002, and the minutes for the special meeting held on May 15, 2002. will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 9. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 04/15/02 04/30/02 Totals $10,159,129.46 $4.912,991.68 05/22/02 Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director or staff member, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 10. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. (1) Receive and file petition from Gene Sobel requesting annexation of 0.505 acres to the District in the vicinity of Via Vista Drive and Cooks Corner in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-08, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-24-Sobel Annexation). b. Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 100535-013, issued to OCB Reprographics for Specification No. 9900-05, for an additional amount of $14,000,for a total amount not to exceed $124,000, providing for additional copying services. C. Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Pall Corporation v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 02CC06622, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 11. Consideration of Items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re May 22, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 24, 2002 to be filed. C. Review and consideration of agenda Items considered by the Steering Committee re the May 22, 2002 meeting. 05/22/02 Page 4 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re the May 1, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 1, 2002 to be filed. C. Approve Amendment No. 6 to Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of District's Residual Solids with Synagro West, Inc. (formerly known as Pima Gro Systems, Inc.), providing for an extension of the contract for the period July 1, 2002 through June,30, 2005, with two additional one-year extensions, at the current all-weather cost of$39.50 per wet ton of biosolids managed for an annual amount not to exceed $2,054,000. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re the May 2, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 2, 2002 to be filed. C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. 131-46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent,Job No. J-53,with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$4,784 and a time extension of 28 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,676,925; and (2)Accept Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. 131-46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black& Veatch Corporation for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, providing for additional design engineering services in the amount of$229,600, for a total amount not to exceed $3,711,523. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the May 8, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 8, 2002 to be filed. (Minutes to be distributed at 0522102 Board Meeting.) C. Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of April 2002. 05/22/02 Page 5 d. Receive and file the 2001-02 Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ending March 31, 2002. e. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2002 through March 31, 2002. f. Renew the District's Boiler& Machinery Insurance Program for the period May 15, 2002 to May 15, 2003, with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $91,696. g. Approve SAFETY-POL-104 and 106, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-05, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. h. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-09, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for (1)Change the title and pay range of current Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($4,469 -$6,324)to Principal Contracts Administrator at pay range El ($5,708 -$8,076);and (2) Create Employee Development Supervisor classification at pay range El ($5,430- $7,683). 16. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re May 13, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 22, 2002 to be filed. C. (1)Approve Trojan Technologies as the ultraviolet light (UV)equipment manufacturer for the Groundwater Replenishment System based on lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$20,253,000, and a total capital cost of $9,749,405, plus tax; (2)Approve a Pre-Selection Agreement between Orange County Water District(OCWD)and Trojan Technologies to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District; (3)Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the UV equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV system at a total estimated capital cost of$8,649,563, plus tax. 17. (1)Approve plans and specifications for Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a Construction Contract to Manuel Bros., Inc. for Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, for an amount not to exceed $243,500. 05f22102 Page 6 r r 18. (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to plans and specifications for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a construction contract to Green Giant Landscape, Inc.for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, for an amount not to exceed $400,426. 19. Adopt proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-18,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Pennittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-15: a. Verbal report of General Counsel b. Receive and file written comments, if any C. Open hearing d. Close hearing e. Discussion by Board of Directors f. Recommended actions: 1. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-18 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-18, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permiftees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-15. 20. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-10,directing the County Tax Collector-Treasurer to include sanitary sewer service charges on the 2002-03 property tax bill. 21. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 22. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 23. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 1- 05/22/02 Page 7 24. Future Meetino Date: The next Board of Directors special meeting is scheduled for June 19, 2002, at 6:00 p.m. 25. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. I General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 Director of Finance Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 Director of Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 Director of Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 Director of Operations & Maintenance Bob Ooten (714) 593-7020 i Director of Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714) 593-7400 Director of Information Technology Patrick Miles (714) 593-7280 Communications Manager Lisa Murphy (714) 593-7120 Assistant to General Manager Greg Mathews (714) 593-7104 G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agendas\2002 Board Agendas\052202 agwda.d= Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING APRIL 24, 2002 �oJ�4 SAAITgTT 9 a ei O .d r�N HE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 04/24/02 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on April 24, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., In the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Shirley McCracken,Vice Chair Tom Daly X Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory A Shawn Boyd John Larson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller X Debbie Cook Connie Boardman X Lauren Cook Larry Crandall A Brian Donahue David Shawver X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer John M. Gullixson X Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley X Beth Krom 1 Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow A Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Paul Walker Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed;Jeff Reed; Sonja Wassgren; Jennifer Cabral; Mark Esquer; Doug Stewart; Simon Watson; Robert Bell; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Alternate Director Alberta Christy; Alternate Director Arlene Schafer; Irwin Haydock;Jan Vandersloot; Larry Porter; Randy Fuhrman; Joey Racano; Dennis Baker; Doug Korthof; Eileen Murphy; Bill Butler; Greg Jewell; Don Steven; Dean Albright; Carol New; Linda Todd; John Shaffer, Hans Curtius; Stephanie Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 04/24/02 Borgen; Patricia Williams; Terry Johnson; Terry Hamilton; Rob Nelson, Victoria Ferber; Mike Ferber; Kip Kennedy; Terry E. Lane; Don Schulz; Elliot Gordon; James Roser; Kris Herdsman; Eric Hutchinson; Charlotte Hutchinson; Marc A. Joot; David Maricich; Robin Keeble; Linda Nicholas; Lisa Rosen; Don McGee 3. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) Citv/Aaencv Active Director Alternate Director Yorba Linda John M. Gullixson Michael Duvall PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons spoke about ocean discharge issues and expressed their opposition to the waiver: Doug Korthoff; Joey Racano; Jan Vandersloot; Dennis Baker; Kris Hardeman; Larry Porter; Irwin Haydock; Eric Hutchinson; Don McGee; Dean Albright; James Roser, Greg Jewell; Don Schulz; Don Slaven; Eileen Murphy; Elliot Gordon; Lisa Rosen; Stephanie Bergen; Linda Nicholas; Rob Nelson. Randy Fuhrman requested the Directors to consider raising user rates more quickly to offset the costs of borrowing. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Eckenrode commended all of the cities and agencies that responded to the Metrolink train accident in the city of Placentia on April 23,2002. As a reminder, the Chair reported that nominations will be open at the May 22n" board meeting for the election of the Chair, and the election would take place at the June 26' meeting for both the Chair and the Vice Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District. It was announced the District received an award from the Government Finance Officers Association for the District's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year ended June 30. 2001. This report qualified for a certification of achievement for excellence in financial reporting. The formal presentation of this award will be made at a future meeting. Chair Eckenrode reported that he and Blake Anderson testified in front of the California Assembly's Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee on Ken Maddox's bill that would prevent the District from applying for a federal clean water act under the provisions of Section 301(h)the day before. Support for the bill came from three members of the ocean ouffall group and the Sierra Club. Opposition came from the District, Irvine Ranch Water District and CASA. The bill was voted 5 to 1 for approval. The General Manager stated staff would continue to closely monitor the bill. He also reiterated that staff is of the opinion that the Assembly should leave the decision to the existing infrastructure of water pollution control that is currently in place. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 04/24/02 It was then announced that a special Board meeting would be held on Wednesday, May 15" beginning at 6:00 p.m. This meeting is for discussion on the findings and recommendations of the Huntington Beach Studies expert panel. A second special Board meeting would also be held on Wednesday, June W, to review the strategic plan update. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, presented employee Sergio Araneta with a check for$2,750 for a suggestion submitted to the IDEA program and subsequently implemented. The check represents 10% of the first year's savings by implementing his suggestion regarding lip sealers on belt presses. Mr. Anderson then recognized Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, who gave an update on the public input regarding the ocean release permit and treatment level issues. Rick Manter of NCG Porter Novelli reported on the various findings from a recent telephone survey conducted April 5-7, 2002, and answered Directors'questions. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, referred the Directors to the 2001 On-Shore Investigation Report placed in their meeting folders that evening. It was noted that discussion of this report, along with the ocean and shoreline monitoring completed during the summer of 1002 would occur at the special Board meeting on May W. In addition to the ocean and shoreline sampling, the District's Source Control inspectors conducted an investigation to determine if any onshore sources could be responsible for the high bacteria concentrations in the waters off Huntington Beach. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel reported there was no need for Closed Session. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 2002 be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/02 03/31/02 Totals $8,467,954.20 $7,119,974.40 Director Mark Leyes abstained. Director Russ Patterson abstained on Warrant No. 42811. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 04/24/02 CONSENTCALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from John Hormuth requesting annexation of 2.226 acres to the District in the vicinity of Meads Drive and Hillside Drive in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-07, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-7- Hormuth Annexation). b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a Grant of Easement, Right of Entry, Maintenance and Indemnity Agreement with the City of Costa Mesa in a form approved by General Counsel at no cost to the District; and (2) Approve a Grant of Easement Agreement with the Newport-Mesa Unified School District, with the District paying the fees over a 5-year period oft$5,252.57 per year for a total cost of$26,262.85, in a form approved by General Counsel. Director Jim Ferryman abstained. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the April 24, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 27, 2002 to be filed. 12. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the April 3, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 3, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with m2t technologies to provide professional services for the evaluation of alternatives for Plant No.2 Oxygen Plant Replacement/ Rehabilitation Assessment, Job No. SP-72,for an amount not to exceed $97,000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to issue Purchase Agreements with Pro Pipe Professional Pipe Services, Innerline Engineering, and National Plant Services for Sewer Line Video Inspection Services, Specification No. 5-2002-81, for a combined annual total amount not to exceed $400,000,with four one-year renewable options. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 04/24/02 e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Award a consulting services contract to Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc.for professional consulting services for development of Asset Management Program, Job No. SP-68,for a total amount not to exceed $455,957; and, (2)approve out-of-country travel for two employees to Australia/New Zealand for the purpose of site visits to five public agencies that have successfully implemented advanced asset management programs. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Establish Cisco Equipment as the District's standard networking equipment; and (2) award a purchase contract to IKON Office Solutions for Purchase of CISCO Equipment, Specification No. E-2002-86, to provide infrastructure networking equipment and maintenance contract, in an amount not to exceed $799.247. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Authorize development of a Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) Program in accordance with the provisions of California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Order No. 01-99, General Discharge Requirements for Sewage Collection Agencies; (2) Establish a new budget of$150,000 for development of the FOG Program; (3)Authorize staff to develop a funding program with the County of Orange and cities within the District's jurisdiction for development of the FOG Program; and (4)Approve a sole source consultant agreement with Environmental Engineering and Construction, Inc. to conduct a study for Phase I of the FOG Program for an amount not to exceed $268,000 h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Authorize the General Manager to exercise informal bidding procedures and sole-source procedures, as applicable, for the award of contracts for the Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Program, Job No.J-87; (2)Authorize the General Manager to purchase and award sole-source contracts, as applicable, for materials and equipment, and/or services, including tanks, pumps, flow meters, and certain electrical and instrumentation devices for testing, feasibility and planning study purposes, as identified by the District's consultants,for use in the Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Program, Job No. J-87, in an amount not to exceed $600,000; and, (3) Increase the sole-source authorization limits for the General Manager to $200,000 for said purchases. 13. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Anderson, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the April 4, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 4, 2002 to be filed. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 04/24/02 C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$200,605 for Distribution and Junction Box Odor Control Modifications,Job No. J-71-1 and J-71-2,for a total budget of$1,290,605; (2) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Distribution and Junction Box Odor Control Modifications, Job No.J-71-1 and J-71-2,with Margate Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$150,582, and a time extension of 168 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $883,249; and (3)Accept Distribution and Junction Box Odor Control Modifications, Job No. J-71-1 and J-71-2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Reject bid received March 27, 2001 from Margate Construction, Inc. for Natural Gas Line Replacement at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2000-22, due to the single bid exceeding the Engineer's Estimate; (2) receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a construction contract to Atlas-Allied, Inc. for Natural Gas Line Replacement at Plant No. 1, Job No. SP2000-22(Rebid), in an amount not to exceed $184,887. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a sole source purchase order to AT&T Wireless for phone service related to Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, in an amount not to exceed $165,000. Director Mark Leyes abstained. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a budget amendment of $168,000 for Facilities Modifications for Odor Control, Job No. J-71-3,for a total project budget of$2,900,000. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Authorize the General Manager to negotiate a purchase order for procurement of services with Power& Compression Systems for Central Generation Automation, Job No. J-79,for an amount not to exceed $1,500,000. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Establish a budget of$1,982,000 for the Engineering Trailer Complex at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-90. 14. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Brady, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, re the April 10, 2002 meeting. The Chair ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 10. 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2002. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 04/24/02 d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve SAFETY-POL-103, 105, 111, 112 and 403, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. 15. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Russ Patterson, _ representative on the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee, re the meeting held on April 22,2002. The Chair ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on February 11, 2002 and February 25, 2002 to be filed. C. Item removed. 16. There was no closed session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:31 p.m. & Secretary of tK6 Board of ctors of Orange County Sanitatiorystrict G:\wp.dbb96ndaSwrd MlnuWQ002 BpaN MlnuleaW42402 minu .dw Claims Paid From 03/O1/02 to 03/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 42607 Orange County Sanitation District 6 485.868.54 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 426M Southern California Edison 61,625.11 Power 42609 Woodruff,Spmdlin&Smart 82,574.21 Legal Services MO 7.26-95 42810 Akilas Safety 3.183.35 Safety Supplies 42611 Amedcan Society For Microbiology 113.00 Membership 42612 Arthur Andersen,L.L.P. 21.380.00 Professlonal Services-Inland Composting&Organic Recycling 42613 Atlantis Pool Care 1.390.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 42614 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3.354.23 Long Distance Telephone Service 42615 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 76.73 Telephone Service 42616 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4.282.35 Cellular Telephone Service 42617 Bentley Systems,Inc. 5,387.50 Software Maintenance Agreement 42618 Court Order 707.94 Wage Garnishment 42619 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 42620 County of Orange(PFRD Geomatics) 1,928.47 Parcel Maps 42621 Voided Check - - 42622 David's Tree Service 2,150.00 Tree Mains.Service 42623 Employment Development Dept. 1,003.00 State Unemployment Tax 42624 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 42625 Government France Officers Association 420.00 Membership 42826 BE Supply 6,611.91 Relay Output Board Exchange 42827 City of Huntington Beach 18.21 Water Use 42628 Industrial Metal Supply 2,948.97 Metal 42629 Ina.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 2,566.35 Dues Deduction 42630 Irvine Ranch Water District 9.00 Water Use 42631 James F.McConnell 1,625.00 Meetirgri'mming Expense Reimbursement 42632 Debra Lakin 527.49 Meedng/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 42633 MarVac Electronics 18,56 Electrical Parts&Supplies 42634 MCMeater-Carr Supply Co. 2,317.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42635 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 12,263.83 (50)Sweep Arm Clevises&Collars for Primary Basin&Repairs&Maint.Services 42636 Court Order 339.50 Wage Garnishment 42637 Mootlys InvesWYs Service 5.000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 42638 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Garnishment 42639 OCB Reprographics 13,31628 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 42640 OCEA 452.86 Dues Deduction 42641 Pacific Bell 34.81 Telephone Services 42642 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 42643 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 42644 Peace Officers Council of CA 936.00 Dues Deduction 42645 Petra Environmental Division 500.00 Prof.Services-Inspection&Recommendation Re Leased Site Garfield/Ward 42646 Public Resources Advisory Group 16,493.38 Financial Advisory Services J-40.3 42647 Ragan Communications,Inc. 99.00 Communications Meeting Registration-Teleseminer 42648 Reliaslar 10,444.70 Employee Life Insurance Premium 42649 Rulan&Tucker L.L.P. 4,957.70 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 42660 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 4.310.98 Mechanical Parts&Supplies - 42651 Court Order 721.50 Wage Gamishmere Pace 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/02 to 03/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42652 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 598.92 Permit Fees-Annual Emissions,Operating&Misc. 42663 Southern California Water 62.32 Water Use 42654 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 5,136.75 Mechanical Supplies 42655 U.S Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 42656 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 42857 Vernon California 2.051.66 Telephone Services 42658 David Woodland 1,123.03 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 42659 Michael C.Bock 336.05 MeeBng/Pralning Expense Reimbursement 42660 Bradley H.Cagle 637.54 Meeting?raintng Expanse Reimbursement 42661 Danny L.Dillon 740.94 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 42662 Tod E.Haynes 340.00 MeetingvTraining Expense Reimbursement 42663 Ernest N.Yeboah 838.39 Meeting/Training Expanse Reimbursement 42664 Allen Dumlao and Dell Computer Corp. 2,707.02 Employee Computer Loan Program 42665 County of Orange 4&00 Annexation Fee 42666 Voided Check - - 42667 CW EA 2002 Annual Conference 4,210.00 O&M Meeting&Training Registration-Calif.Water Environ.Assoc. 42668 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fee 42669 Stale Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 42670 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 29,057.36 Prol.Services- Can.Gen Cam Failures&Fuel Mixing System Evaluation 42671 Air Products&Chemicals 25.052.81 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO B-8-89 42672 Applied Ocean Sciences 30,078.00 Prof.Services-HB Shoreline Contamination Investigation 42673 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 568.678.46 Proleaslonal Services J-73-2 42674 AKM Consulting Engineers 44,776.18 Professional Services 7-36,7-39,7-41 -Trunk Sewer Improvements 42875 Black is Veatch Corporation 200,891.51 Engineering Services P1.46.2,P2-55&J-77 42676 Blue Cross of California 225,474.92 Medical Insurance Premium 42677 Brawn&Caldwell 31,331.63 Engineering Services 1-98 42578 Camito Engineers 515,168.12 Professional Services P2-50,P2-66&Micro filtration Demo Study 42679 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 82,830.34 (25)Computers 42680 J R Rlanc Construction 39,683.00 Construction P2-66-1&Retrofit Scrubbers G,J&1 42681 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 33,587.92 Medical Insurance Premium 42682 Komiron Pacific,Inc. 72,866.48 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 42683 Life&Flo,Inc. 92.008.43 Engineering Services 549,5-50,5-51,5-52& P1.93 42684 Merlin Luther Hospital 45,057.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 42685 Mike Pdich&Sons 447,838.75 Construction-Force Main Repairs at Bitter Point Pump Station 42686 NeMork Catalyst,Inc. 25.203.81 Computer Software User License 426a7 NeWersanl of Southern California 31,325.78 Prev.Maim.-Accesa Control Sys.&CCTV Sys., Install Card Readers Pit.2 Co.Gen. 42688 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 34,953.17 Caustic Soda&Bleach 42669 Polydyne,Inc. 28,780.44 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 42690 Projects Partners 42,429.78 Temporary Employment Services 42691 South Coast Environmental Co. 42,935.40 Gen Gen Emissions Testing Service 42692 Sunciipse,IncJCOm1 Kraft 27,618.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42693 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 111,310.21 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 42694 Tule RanchlMagan Farma 106,825.21 Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95 42695 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 58.035.49 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 42696 West American Rubber Company 28.836.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42697 The Yakima Company 46216.97 Residuals Removal MO3-22-00 Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/02 to 0.90`15102 warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42698 J W Contracting Corporation 176,128.00 Construction P2.60 42699 Margate Construction,Inc. 2,357,948.00 Construction P137,P2.39,J-71-7 42700 Mike Pnioh&Sons 156,190.55 Construction-Juncture Structure Upgrade 42701 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 40,664.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Pit 1 42702 Southern Contracting Company 72,346.00 Construction J-33-1A 42703 12 Technologies 2,058.15 Software Maintenance Agreement 42704 Great American Printing Co. 105.76 Stationery&Office Supplies 42705 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 421.62 Lab Pans&Supplies 42706 Airborne Express 45.80 Air Freight 42707 Airgas Safety 379.96 Safety Supplies 42700 All American Asphalt 17,064.00 Construction-Manhole Repairs in Fountain Valley 42709 Allied Electronics,Inc. 90.17 Electrical Supplies 42710 American Aldines 4,826.00 Travel Services 42711 American Chemical Society 119.00 Membership 42712 American Society of CIVA Engineers 30.00 Publication 42713 Anthony Post Control,Inc. 1,285.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 42714 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 11050.00 Toxicity Testing 42715 Arch Wireless 2,278.44 Pagers.Service&Aidime 42716 Armor Vac Sweeping Service 1,195.00 Vacuum Truck Services 42717 PFE International,Inc. 221.00 Mainl.Agreement-Mail Center Manager 42718 Atlantis Pool Care 500.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 42719 Automatic Timing&Controls 1,322.84 Printer Repairs&Supplies 42720 Awards B Trophies By Bea 52.03 Plaques 42721 AAAS 120.00 Membership-American Assoc.for the Advancement of Science 42722 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 17.11 Telephone Service 42723 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 63.21 Cellular Telephone Service 42724 AT&T Wireless Services 2,504.31 Wireless Phone Service 42725 AWSI 166.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 42726 Battery Specialties 507.12 Batteries 42727 Bazz Houston Co. 6,811.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42728 BioMedeux Vgek,Inc. 569AI Lab Supplies 42729 Bloomberg,L.P. 5,301.30 Financing Monitoring MO 4-14.93 42730 Bonhwick,Guy,Beffenhausen 5,791.02 Professional Services P2.84 42731 Buena Park Lumber&Hardware 1,982.06 Lumber/Hardware 42732 Bush&Associates,Inc. 8,208.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25.97 42733 California Barricade Pardee 760.00 Worksite Salary Protection Barricades 42734 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 2,083.33 Professional Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 42735 Camfil Fan Sales 973.42 Air Purifiers 42736 Carollo Engineers 2,000.00 Prof.Services-Tech.Specs.Re Mech. Equipment-Digestion&Dewatering at Pit.1 42737 Center for Creative Growth 1.250.00 Prof.Services-O&M Executive Management Coaching 42738 Chapman Hospital 3.705.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42739 City Lights Design Alliance 2.944.29 Professional Services 5-50 42740 Columbia West Anaheim Madkal Comer 15,445AS Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42741 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 3,258.40 Professional Services-Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 42742 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 470.78 Plumbing Supplies 42743 Cooper Energy Systems 822.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid Frown 03/01/02 to 03/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description - 42744 Cornerstone Management Consulting 1,500.00 Consulting Services-Management Training 42745 Corporate Express Imaging 1.964.46 Computer Supplies 42746 Corporate Egress 28125 Office Supplies 42747 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 350625 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 42748 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,433.19 Sewer Service Fee Administration 42749 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Malin Agreement-Gen Gen Water Softner System 42750 CALPERLA 390.00 Membership 42751 CASA 1,800.00 Admin.&Compliance Meeting Registration 42752 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 6.075.00 Lab Analysis 42753 CWEA-SSCSC 180.00 O&M Training Registration,Catff.Water Environment Association 42754 CWEA Membership 140.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 42755 Dapper Tire Co. 587.95 Truck Tires 42756 David's Tree Service 3,500.00 Tree Maint.Service 42757 Del Mar Analytical 1.692.00 Biosolids Analysis 42758 Dezur k c/o O'Connor Sales,Inc. 2,156.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42759 Diehl,Evans&Co.,L.L.P. 900.00 Prof.Sew.-Presentation to FAHR Comm.Re Prospective Auditing Services 42760 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 5.830.69 Inventory File Conversion Services 42761 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 217.66 Paint Supplies 42762 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 1.573.16 Electrical Supplies 42763 Electra-bond 147.08 Repairs&Maintenance Materials 42764 Electra Numerics,Inc. 1.682.36 Electrical Paris&Supplies 42765 Elactro-Test,Inc. 2,640.00 Maintenance Services-Portable Generators at Pit.2 42766 Enchanter,Inc. 4,000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 42767 Environmental Resource Association 1,186.80 Lab Paris&Supplies 42768 Eric Klein 8,000.00 Professional Services-EMT Relmat 42769 Euromerm Group Companies 702.02 Electrical Paris&Supplies 42770 Executive Portraits 199.15 Professional Services-Photography 42771 EPC:Electrical Power&Controls,Inc. 650.52 Electrical Paris&Supplies 42772 ESSCO. Engineering Sales Service 603.64 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 42773 FedEx Corporation 75.92 Air Freight 42774 Filter Supply Company 104.37 Filters 42775 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 10,296.32 Lab Pans&Supplies 42776 Flat and Ventral,Inc. 704.50 Concrete Cutting 42777 Flexible Metal Hose Manufacturing 4,58828 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42778 Foodcra8 Coffee&Refreshment Services 303.64 Meeting Supplies 42779 Fountain Valley Camera 16.32 Photo Supplies 42780 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 482.44 Truck Wash Tickets 42781 Franklin Covey 98.06 Office Supplies 42782 Frys Electronics 3,363.21 Computer Supplies 42793 Ganahl Lumber Company 430.35 Lumber/Hardware 42784 Goldenwest Fence Company 23,1S8.62 Chain Link Fencing-J-36 42785 Gctdenwest Window Service 2,462.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.a990015 42706 Goodway Technologies Corp 317.00 Inst.Parts&Supplies 42787 W W Grainger,Inc. 1,375.71 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 42788 Grating Pacific,Inc. 2.543.97 Fiberglass Grating 42789 GMF Sound,Inc. 425.19 Audio System Maint.-Tour Bus Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/02 to Off S 02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Deacriptlon 42790 American Sigma,Inc. 650.34 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 42791 Harold Primrose toe 37.00 Ice For Samples 42792 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 2,408.14 Plumbing Supplies 42793 Hatch 8 Kirk,Inc. 177.09 Engine Generator Control Supplies 42794 Herb's Blacklorest Bakery 8 Deli 307.50 Meeting Expenses 42795 Hild,Inc. 75.64 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 42796 Hcerbiger Service, Inc. 26219 Compressor Pans 42797 Home Depot 10.60 Small Hardware 42798 HI Stivdard Automotive 113.95 Automotive Supplies 42799 Imaging Express 107.19 Printer Maintenance 42800 Industrial Distribution Group 982.07 Mechanical Paris 8 Supplies 42801 Industrial Metal Supply 1,586.73 Metal,Piping 8 Tubing 428M Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 9,724.00 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 42803 Infinity Technology USA 443.82 Computer Supplies 42804 Insurance Educational Association 135.00 Safety 8 Emergency Response Training Registration 42805 Ionics Instrument Business Group 996.32 Lab Pans 8 Supplies 42006 Iran Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 240.00 OBshe Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 42807 IBM Corp. 530.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 42808 J 8 L Industrial Supply S66.81 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 420D9 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 4,870.48 Instrument Supplies 42810 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 6,223.89 Installation 8 Maintenance of Gas Flaps for Collection System 42811 Jana Contracting Corp. 5.215.60 Construction-Sewer Lateml Repairs 42812 Jays Catering 1,122.61 Meeting Expenses 42813 Jefferson Smurfit Corp. 21.857.45 Recoricilialion User Fee Refund Program 42814 Jensen Instrument Co. 1,051.34 Incl.Pars 8 Supplies 42815 Joe Rhodes Maintenance Services,Inc. 1.756.42 Maintenance Agreement-OCSD Fuel Management System 42816 John WisyB Sons,Inc. 211.00 Publication 42817 Johnstone Supply 56.84 Electrical Supplies 42818 Jonathan Manufacturing Corp. 16,788.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42819 JAMS/ENDISPUTE 525.00 Legal Services-Train vs.Kovacs 42820 Kaiser Rollmet 12.368.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42821 Kam Advance Materials,Inc. 4,719.50 Prof.Services-Waterline Pipe Failure at Pit.1 Activated Sludge Facility 42822 Klee Associates,Inc. 335.00 Subscription 42823 KLBP Marketing 2,305.72 Safety Incentive Items 42824 Laundedand 252.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42825 Law/Crandall 8,797.82 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182 42826 Lawyers Title Company 8,640.00 Real Property Title Report-5-50 42827 La Mona Chemical Products 153.87 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 42828 Undsay Engineering Services 4,000.00 Engr.Services-Vibration Monitoring of Critical Equipment 42829 Unfair Company clo Gerald Jones 4,326.94 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 42830 Uniform Center 266.06 OCSD Logo Patches for Personnel Night Jackets 42831 Lorm in Education Services 259.00 Safety 8 Emergency Response Meeting Registration 42832 Los Alamitos General Hospital 8.072.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42833 Lumi's 13125 Meeting Expense 42834 Mamco International 1.422.30 Janitorial Supplies 42835 MarVac Electronics 26.33 Electrical Pans 8 Supplies Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/02 to 03116/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42836 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 173.89 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 42837 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 805.75 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 42838 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 1,839.53 Pump Seal 42839 Media Clips,Inc. 73.00 Notion&Ada 42840 Medlin Controls Co. 141.38 Instrument Supplies 42841 Michael Tumpseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 42842 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 3,970.00 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 42843 Milbank West,Inc. 20.362.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42844 Mission Uniform Service 4,555.25 Uniform Rentals 42845 National Microcomp Services 1,212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 42946 National Research Council Canada 326.34 Lab Parts&Supplies 42947 National Water Research Institute 255.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 42848 Neal Supply Co. 638.59 Plumbing Supplies 42849 NeWanage,Inc. 1.939.50 Software Maint.Agreement 42850 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 14,508.81 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 42851 Northwest Hydraulic Consultants,Inc. %8.06 Professional Services 5.49 42952 NWRI National Water Research Institute 4,354.75 OCSD 113 Contribution-Video Conlerencing at OCWD&MWDOC Board Rm. 42853 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,396.22 Office Supplies 42854 OneSoume DisWbutors,Inc. 75.38 Electrical Parts&Supplies 42855 Oxygen Service Company 157.90 Specialty times 42866 OCB Reprographics 1,042.63 Printing Service-MO 1126100 42857 CCE-USA,Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Mainl. 428M P.L.Hewn Company,Inc. 31.68 Filters 42859 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 42860 Parker Supply Company 998.54 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 42861 Partition Resources,Inc. 380.00 Partition Moving Services-Finance Dept. 42862 Peerless Wiping Materials Co. 984.75 Jandorial Supplies 42863 Plelon Corp.#2 24,165.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42864 Pon Supply 41.20 Safety Supplies 42865 Power Design 2,171.73 Electrical Supplies 42866 Power Lift Corporation 468.46 Fork Lift Repairs 42867 Power Systems Testing Company 1,976.00 O&M Training Registration 42868 Praxan.Inc. 21.19 Lab Supplies 42869 Primary Source 6,776.61 Office Furniture 42870 Protech Petroleum Services,Inc. 3,770.00 Maim.Agreement-Underground Storage Tanks Inspection&Certification 42871 Putzmeisler 174.17 Pump Maintenance 42872 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service 42873 Quality Aluminum Forge 1,182.73 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42874 COS,L.L.C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service 42875 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 3,309.32 Instrument Supplies 42876 R.L.Abbott It Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Biosolide Consulting Services 42877 Rainbow Disposal Co. 4,579.40 Trash Removal 42878 Realty Associates Fund IV,L.P. 13.625.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42879 R.A.Reed Electric 4,043.65 Motor Overhaul 42880 Robert F.Driver Assoc.,Inc. 3,128.00 Crime Insurance 42881 Royce Multimedia,Inc. 7325 Video Services Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/01/02 to 03(1&W Warrant No. Vendor Amoud Desprlption 42882 Ryan Heroo Products Corp. 760.77 Pump Supplies 42883 RPM Electric Motors 206.50 Motor 428M Schneider Electric 219.35 Instrument Repairs 42885 Schwing America,Inc. 903.67 Mechanical Pane&Supplies 42886 Sears Industrial Sales 1,063.98 Mechanical Supplies 42887 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 323.47 Tools 42888 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,182.49 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 42889 Supelco,Inc. 1,527.58 Lab Pans It Supplies 42890 SINIPath Seminars 199.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 42891 Smardan Supply Company 57.97 Plumbing Supplies 42892 So.Cal,Gas Company 13=20 Natural Gas 42893 Southern California Edison 7,32223 Power 42894 Spectrum Video,Inc. 1.200.00 Software 42895 Summit Steel 786.12 Metal 42896 Sunset Industrial Parts 426.15 Mechanical Supplies 42897 Super Poser Products 357.90 Janitorial Supplies 42898 BARBS 475.00 Planning Meeting Registration 42899 SCTNA 100.00 Membership 42900 Severn Trent Laboratories,Inc. 2,756.00 Lab Analytical Service 42901 Terminit International Co.a2474 176.00 Pest Control 42902 Thennoo Systems,Inc. 8,669.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42903 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1.515.17 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 42904 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 42905 Daily Pilot 381.25 Notices&Ads 42906 Tony's Lock It Safe Service&Sales 22.63 Locks&Keys 42907 Toro Aire,Inc. 91.59 Electrical Parts&Supplies 42908 Triple A Containers 265.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42909 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 11,054.18 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 42910 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 788.62 Truck Supplies 42911 Tmesdail Laboratories,Inc. 50.00 Lab Services 42912 TCH Associates,Inc. 585.07 Lab Supplies 42913 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 42914 Unismd Los Angeles 882.82 Mechanical Pans,Supplies&Repairs 42915 United Parcel Service 190.82 Parcel Services 42916 Universal Circuits,Inc. 869.04 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42917 Unocal 76 22.49 Fuel for Vehicles 42918 UC Regents-CPER 195.00 Subscription 42919 Valoo Instruments Co.,Inc. 65.84 Lab Parts&Supplies 42920 Valentec International Corp. 4,546.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42921 Valley Cities Supply Company 323.25 Mechanical Pans It Supplies 42922 Valley Splicing Co. 1.250.00 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 42923 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 20,BW.00 Temporary Employment Service 42924 Vapex,Inc. 2,329.51 Maintenance Services-16 Seminal Units 42925 Veritem 1.000.00 Maintenance Agreement for Firewall Server 42926 Verizon California 99.28 Telephone Services 42927 Veme's Plumbing 2,575.00 Testing&Certification of BacMMw Devices at Pas.1 &2 and Pump Stations Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 03/16/02 to 03/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42997 Boyle Engineering Corporation 26,822.50 Engineering Services 2-31 &6-13 42998 BP Energy Company 107,35122 Natural Gas 42M Carono Engineers 99,357.71 Professional Services J-25-4,J-39&Disinfection&Microliltration Studies 43000 County Wholesale Electric Co. 42,320.76 Electronic Modules&Electrical Parts&Supplies 43001 CGv-Engineers; 40.347.97 Professional Services P2-82 43002 CH2M Hill 29,416.84 Professional Services J-71-7 43003 Delta Dental 52,188.71 Dental Insurance Plan 43004 Health Science Associates 30,584.50 Professional Services-Asbestos Study 43005 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. IB2,040.82 Ferric Chloride MO9-27-95 43006 Mika Prlich&Sons 89,057.11 Construction-Force Main Repairs at Bitter Point Pump Station 43007 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 42,170.62 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99 43008 Painewebber Incorporated 39.538.36 COP Remarketing Agreement 43009 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 170.737.40 Engineering Services J-42&J35-2 43010 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 37.864.93 Sodium Hypochloriie 43011 Plae-Tanks Industries,Inc. 40,243.70 (1)Fiberglass Reinforced Caustic Storage Tank 43012 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 79,462.30 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8.94 43013 Southern California Edison 58,494.63 Power 43014 Synegro Technologies.Inc. 316.177.76 Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95 43016 T9419 Engineering Associates 33.480.00 Bell Press Supplies 43016 Tran Consulting Engineers 88,986.00 Engineering Services 546,7-21 It 1.17 43017 Tula Ranch 169.701.38 Pennil Fees&Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95 43018 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 95.261.64 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 43019 The Vaklma Company 63,224.45 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 43020 Ken Thompson,Inc. 686,518.00 Construction 5.46 43021 A-1 Enterprises,Inc. 545.00 Fence Repairs 43022 Abatix Environmental Corp. 220.89 Hardware 43023 Absolute Standards,Inc. 125.00 Lab Pans&Supplies 43024 AccuStandard,Inc. 1,268.85 Lab Parts&Supplies 43025 Great American Printing Co. 1,393.33 Stationery&Office Supplies 43026 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 2,504.12 Inst.Parts&Repairs 43027 Aearo Company 1,072.50 Safety Supplies 43028 Air Liquids America Corp. 1,233.99 Specialty Gasses 43029 Airlwme Express 45.96 Air Freight 43030 American Seals West 32.40 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43031 Analysts,Inc. 2.040.50 Testing Kits 43032 Aquarium of the Pacific 23.90 Reimbursable Employee Activity Expense 43033 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 12,800.O1) Toxicity&Disinfection Program Testing 43034 Ark Construction Company 12,000.00 Construction-Installation of Doorway,in Admin Bldg. 43035 Asbury Environmental Services 100.00 Waste Oil Removal 43036 Automatic Timing&Controls 88.38 Printer Repairs 43037 Awards&Trophies By Boa 34.91 Plaques 43038 AIHce American Industrial Hygiene Confer 1,750.00 Human Resources Training Registration 43039 ABBE American Sm.of Safety Engineers 1,175.00 Human Resources Training Registration&Membership 43040 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 656.51 Telephone Service 43041 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 261.30 Telephone Service 43042 AT&T Wireless Services 1,356.82 Wireless Telephone Services Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/02 to 03/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43043 AVO International 12,100.00 Professional Services-On-Site Training 43064 Battery Specialties 906.39 Batteries 43045 Camel Financial,Inc.c/o Bearing Metal 585.80 Metal Supplies 43046 Ball Pipe&Supply Co. 46.56 Piping Supplies 43047 Boot Bam 196.29 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 43048 Brown&Caldwell 18,411.94 Professional Services-Waste Discharge Requirements/CMOM Program Support 43049 Bush&Associates,Inc. 3,928.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 43050 BMW Construction Corp. 1,733.30 Acoustic Enclosure for Ultrasonic Test Unit 43051 California Automatic Gate 993.72 Service Agreement 43052 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc 2.083.33 Professional Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 43053 Cameron Welding Supply 589.73 Electrical Paris&Supplies 43054 Camfil Fan Sales 110.48 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43055 Career Track 129.00 Lab Training Registration 43056 Cerollo Engineers 1,78129 Professional Services-Biosolids Management Options 43057 Copelco Capital,Inc. 12822D Copier Lease 43058 City of Fountain Valley 16,570.80 Water Use 43059 Communications Supply Corp. 180.99 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43060 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 1,572.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43061 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,693.19 Plumbing Supplies 43062 Cooper Energy Services 1,028.26 Engine Supplies 43063 Corporate Express Imaging 461.49 Computer Supplies 43064 Corporate Express 4,875.05 Office Supplies 43065 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 1,873.00 Custodial Services Spec,No.9899-09 43066 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 225.47 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43067 County of Orange 100.00 Encroachment Permit-Busharo Trunk Sewer 43058 County of Orange(PFRD Geomatim) 2,573.50 Parcel Maps 43069 County of Orange,Auditor Controller 140.00 Maine Agreement-RepairAnstall.of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios 43070 County of Orange,Auditor Controller %198.00 Sewer Spill Clean-Up Assistance at PCH 43071 Crane America Services,Inc. 3.422.16 Crane Services 43072 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Mainl.Agreement-Can Gen Water Sooner System 43073 Cyclus EmArpsystems,Inc. 11,755.64 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 43074 CA Emissions Program 6.40 Emissions Testing 43075 CEPA Company 225.00 Lab Equipment Maine Service 43076 CISCO Systems 862.00 Software Maint.Agreement 43077 CR&R,Inc. 10,942.92 Container Rentals 43078 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 435.00 0&M Meeting Registration-California Water Environment Association 43079 David Wilson's Ford of Orange 17,707.80 (1)2002 Ford Ranger Pickup Truck 43080 David's Tree Service 2,010.00 Tree Maim.Service 43081 Del Mar Analytical 1,245.00 Biosolids Analysis 43082 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 1,61625 (50)Ergonomic Keyboards 43053 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 501.39 Paint Supplies 430S4 Dynamic Graphics Magazine 52.80 Subscription 43085 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 51.72 Electrical Supplies 43086 Enchanter,Inc. 2,401 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 43087 Equipoo Sales&Service 251.35 [mt.Repairs,Malnt.&Pans 43088 Eurotherm Controls c/o Golden State Cord 3.447.42 Inst.Pans,Supplies and Software Paae 3.18 EXHIBITS Claims Paid From 03/16/02 to 03/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43089 EuroMerm Group Companies 3,515.47 Instrument Paris&Supplies 43090 ESRI,Inc. 9,431.25 Software,Server Maint.&Support 43091 F.H.Pumps 483.14 Pump Supplies 43092 FedEx Corporation 272.17 Air Freight 43093 Filter Supply Company 39.59 Filters 43094 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 15,241.48 Lab Parts&Supplies 43095 Rexicraft Industries 4,021.23 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43096 Fla-Systems, Inc. 670.09 Pump Supplies 43097 Fountain Valley Camera 27.90 Photo Supplies 43098 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 526.44 Truck Wash Tickets 43099 Franklin Covey 321.53 Office Supplies 43100 Fry's Electronics 561.79 Computer Supplies 43101 City of Fullerton 57.56 Water Use 43102 Ganahl Lumber Company 88.31 LumberMardware 43103 Gerratt-Callahan Company 199.34 ill Model 5018 Bypass Feeder 43104 General Petroleum 11.577.05 Unleaded Gasoline 43105 George Buslamante 6,579.35 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 4310E George T.Hall 1,880.83 last Parts&Supplies 43107 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. 8,018.76 Bell Filter Press Supplies 43108 Gold Systems,Inc. 3,618.75 Professional Services-Dale Migration&STORET Interface Application 43109 W W Grainger,Inc. 740.71 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43110 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 295.21 Janitorial Supplies 43111 BE MuI81in,Inc. 425.00 Electrical Equipment Repair 43112 Harper&Associates Engineering,Inc. 2,917.50 Engineering Services-Concrete Corrosion in Pit.2 Headworks Facility 43113 Herb's Bleckforest Bakery&Dell 63.25 Meeting Expenses 43114 HIM.Inc. 98.05 Battery 43115 Home Depot 467.12 Smell Hardware 43116 City of Huntington Beach 18,775.80 Water Use 43117 I.D.Industries,Inc. 374.04 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43118 Ida. 1,342.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 43119 Imaging Express 741.88 Printer Maintenance 43120 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,897.61 Printing Service 43121 Industrial Distribution Group 1.190.46 Paint Supplies 43122 Industrial Metal Supply 469.70 Metal 43123 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 31.98 Fasteners 43124 Infinity Technology USA 374.32 Computer Supplies 43125 Innerline Engineering 6,567.50 Professional Services-CCTV Videoing of Trunklines 43126 Intergraph Corporation 745.00 Engineering Meeting Registration 43127 Inlratek Computer,Irc. 1,580.34 NeMrork&Server Maintenance 43128 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1,517.83 Instrument Supplies 43129 Ionics Instrument Business Group 504.39 Lab Pans&Supplies 43130 Irvine Ranch Water District 58.00 Water Use 43131 IBM Corp. 1.844.72 IBM AS/400 Lease&Support 43132 IDMS:Imaging Document Mgmt.Solutions 5,564.35 Contract Services J-25-1 43133 J&L Industrial Supply 604.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43134 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 1.719.77 Instrument Supplies Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16/02 to 03/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43135 James Carver,CHMIA Treasurer 30D.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 43136 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 16,669.88 Construction-Mlller-Holder Trunkline Inso,Waterline Repairs,Easement Repairs 43137 Jays Catering 761.29 Meeting Expenses 43138 Jensen Instrument Co. 1,229.21 papers&Maintenance Supplies 43139 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 11,015.04 Professional Services-Compensation&Classification Study 43140 Johnstore Supply 28.95 Electrical Supplies 43141 JPC Construction 1,925.00 Construction-Install Window in Human Resources Building 43142 JWC Environmental 9.897.92 Modify/Upgrade Muffin Monster 43143 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 3,039.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 431" Kings County Tan Collector 15,140.66 Property Tares 43145 Lenls-Nexis 91.62 Books&Publications 43146 Lindsay Engineering Services 1,938.88 Professional Services-2-Day Training Course on Laser Alignment 43147 Linter Company c/o Gerald Jonas 4,352.58 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 43148 Liquid Hatu ling Systems 1,558.68 Pumping Supplies 43149 Long Beach Line-X 397.00 Truck Bed Coating 43150 Lucci's 81.25 Meeling Expense 43151 LA Chemical 15.772.97 Caustic Soda 43152 Manley's Boiler Repair Company,Inc, 7,672.71 Boiler Repairs It Testing 43153 MerVac Electronics 30.41 Electrical Pans&Supplies 43154 MOJunkin Corporation 79.87 Plumbing Supplies 43155 McMasler-Carr Supply Co. 1,638.03 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43156 Media Clips,Inc. 192.03 Notices&Ada 43157 The Penn Air Group 21,000.Dg Service Agreement-HVAC Duct Cleaning 43158 Michael Tumipsead It Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tula Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 43159 Midway Mlg&Machining Co. 4,575.00 Pump,Supplies and Pump Repairs 43160 Minarik 1,205.24 Instrument Supplies 43161 Mission Uniform Service 4,805.23 Unform Rentals 43162 MoloPhoto 11.27 Photographic Services 43163 MSA c/o Meg Systems 244.15 Instrument Pads&Supplies 43164 UC Regents 387.08 Lab Analyses 43165 National Plant Services,Inc. 3,300.00 Vacuum Truck Services 43166 Neal Supply Co. 289.20 Plumbing Supplies 43167 NelVersant of Soulhi m California 5,701.39 Human Resources Security System Improvements 43168 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 1.764.53 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 43169 Ninyo It Moore Corporate Accounting 5,455.25 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 43170 The Norco Companies 156.00 Mall Delivery Service 43171 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 91.45 Asset Tags 43172 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,605.28 Office Supplies 43173 OhmerVVEGA Corp. 990.00 Safety Training Registration 43174 Olsun Electrics Corp. 1,542.00 Electrical Pans&Supplies 43175 OneSoume Distributors,Inc. 1.339.98 Ins.Pans,Supplies&Repairs 43176 Optio Software 2.700.00 Software Maintenance 43177 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment,Inc. 802.74 Fuel Pump Equipment 43178 Orange Fluid System Tech.,Inc. 200.66 Lab Pans&Supplies 43179 Oxygen Service Company 9,006.32 Specialty Gases 43180 OCB Reprographics 2,529.26 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03/16102 to 03/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43181 OCE-USA,Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Maim. 43182 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 560.65 Electrical Supplies 43183 Pacific Bell 925.17 Telephone Services 43184 Pacific Mechanical Supply 212.45 Plumbing Supplies 43185 Pacific Parts&Controls 5,612.09 Electrical Supplies 43186 Parker Supply Company 2.791.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43187 Parkhouse Tire Co. 1.350.83 Time 43188 Perms Pure,Inc. 3.333.43 Filter 43189 Plumbing&Industrial Supply 171.32 Water Heater 43190 Polydyne,Inc. 24.364.35 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 43191 Postmaster 760.00 Post Office Box Rental 43192 Pourer Measurement Limited 200.00 Instrument Repairs 43193 Process Equipment Company 3,286.22 Pump Parts&Supplies 43194 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 15,435.74 OCTV Sewedine Inspection-Revenue Area 7 43195 Protech Petroleum Services,Inc. 218.47 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance Services 43196 Public Resources Advisory Group 10,675.00 Financial Advisory Services 43197 PCS Express 110.00 Courier Service 43198 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 472.76 Instrument Pans&Supplies 43199 Regents of Univ.of California 1,451.88 Professional Services J-85 43200 Rellastar Bankers Security Ufa Ins. 8.502,38 Life Insurance Premium 43201 Re91ek Corp 248.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 43202 RceemounWnibc 564.50 Instrument Supplies 43203 Rutland Tool&Supply 657.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43204 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 1.013.11 Pump Supplies 43205 RBF Engineers 19,201.98 Engineering Services 2-24-1 4=6 RJN Group,Inc. 10.750.00 CMMS Consulting Services 43207 RPM Electric Motors 164.86 Electrical Pans&Supplies 4320E Salety-Wean 420.16 Safety Pans Cleaning Service 43209 Sanodus Corporation 474.87 Lab Equlment Service 43210 Saybolt,L.P. 1.100.00 Air Analysis 43211 Schwing America,Inc. 1,842.31 Pump Parts&Supplies 43212 City of Seal Beach 79.93 Water Use 43213 Sears Industrial Sales 662.69 Mechanical Supplies 43214 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,505.22 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43215 Supelce,Inc. 114.67 Lab Supplies 43216 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Goad 317.84 Plumbing Supplies 43217 So.Calif.Gas Company 1,336.87 Natural Gas 43218 SoflChoice 4,703.29 Software 43219 South Coast Air Quality Management Clef. 602.55 Permit Fees-Annual Emissions,Operation&Misc.Fees 43220 Southern California Edison 24.87 Power 43221 Specialized Powder Coaling 300.00 Powder Coaling of Tool Box Brackets 43222 Strafe International,Inc. 506AG Chemicals 43223 Suncor Stainless,Inc. 178.18 Lab Supplies 4=4 Sunset Industrial Pans 935.98 Mechanical Pane&Supplies 43225 SAWPA 3,000.00 Prof.Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 43226 STL Sacramento 920.00 Lab Analytical Service Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 03M6/02 to 03/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43227 T&C Industrial Controls,Inc. 1,050.56 Electrical Supplies 43228 Techni-Tool,Inc. 49.48 Electrical Supplies 43229 Teledyne Analytical 186.35 Instrument Pens&Supplies 43230 Tetra Tech,Inc. 11,031.39 Professional Services-Ocean Monitoring&Contract No.11-22 43231 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 613.35 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43232 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 43233 Time Warner Communication 9D.44 Cable Services 43234 Toms Lock&Safe Service&Sales 616.80 Locks&Keys 43235 Top Hat Productions 245.58 Meeting Expenses 43236 Traffic Control Service,Inc. 6,469.61 Traffic Safety Equipment Rental 43237 The Training Clinic 699.00 Human Resources Training Registration 43238 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 350.00 Contract Groundskeeping NO 5-11.94 43239 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 24.35 Truck Supplies 43240 Ultra Scientific 83.44 Lab Supplies 43241 The Unisoume Corporation 94.23 Office Supplies 43242 United Asset Coverage,Inc. 22,611.33 Phone System Maint. 43243 United Parcel Service 711.71 Parcel Services 43244 Naval Post Graduate School 13,984.95 Professional Services J-85 43245 UC Regents 495.00 Human ResourceS Training Registration 43246 UCl Regents 6,981.63 Professional Services J-85 43247 Valor Instruments Co.,Inc. 455.24 Lab Supplies 43248 Varian,Inc. 1,380.54 Lab Supplies 43249 Vedzon California 1,246.05 Telephone Services 43250 Veme's Plumbing 775.00 Plumbing Equipment Service 43251 Village Nurseries 2,340.00 Landscaping Supplies 43252 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,439.04 Vision Service Premium 43253 Vortex Industries,Inc. 1,872.55 Door Repair 43254 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 24,075.69 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 43255 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 4,897.91 Lab Supplies 43256 The Wackenhut Corporation 4,141.47 Securty Guards 43257 Wally Machinery and Tool Supply,Inc. 267.46 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43258 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 3,028.43 Engineering Service J-67 43259 Waters Corporation 117.68 Lab Supplies 43200 Waxie Sanitary Supply 889.06 Janitorial Supplies 43261 Wells Supply Company 80.82 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43262 West Group 127.00 Subscription 43263 West-Lite Supply Company,Inc. 929.46 Electrical Supplies 43264 Wilhelm Electric Co.,Inc. 11.143.00 Construction J-77 43265 Wilson Supply,Inc. 1,658.00 Electrical Pans&Supplies 43256 Wileg Scientific 381.43 Lab Supplies 43267 WEF 201.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 43268 WS Atkins Water 18,266.70 Prof.Sew.-Ultrasonic Treatmt.of Digester Sludge&Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Devi. 43269 Xerox Corporation 8.060.65 Copier&Fax Losses 43270 Vokoginva Corp.of America 5.211.33 Instruments,Pads&Supplies 43271 Zumar Industries 148.98 Directional Signs 43272 Use Arosteguy 109.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement " Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 03/16/02 to 03/31/02 Warrant No, Vendor Amount Description ' 43273 Shebbir S.Besrai 1,250.01 Meeting raining Expense Reimbursement 43274 Skip E.Bemer 514.36 MeeBng/haining Expense Reimbursement 43276 Thomas M.Blenda 302.10 Meeting//reining Expense Reimbursement 43276 Pongsakdi Cady 345.44 MeetingRralning Expense Reimbursement 43277 Randy E.Hauls 107.61 Meeting Training Expense Reimbursement 43278 Kathleen T.Millen 926.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43279 John W.Swindler 513.79 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43250 Robert C.Thompson 188.71 Meeling/Raining Expense Reimbursement 43281 Laurie S.Bluestein 495.75 Vehicle Damage Claim 43282 CSMFO 100.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 43283 Orange County Sanitation District 693.07 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,643,92925 Payroll Disbursements 26142-26275 Employee Paychecks $ 177.154.98 Biweekly Payroll 03/20/02 26276-26294 Interim Paychecks 108,355.50 Termination Paychecks 6 Adjustments 70879-71344 Direct Deposit Statements 813,596.50 Biweekly Payroll 03/20/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,099,105.98 Who Transfer Payments State Street Bank 3 Trust Co.of CA $ 376,938.17 March Interest Payment on Sense A 8 B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 376,938.17 Total Claims Paid 03/16/02-03131/02 $ 7,119,974.40 Page 8 of a EXHIBIT B BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To6d.or .Dlr. osizzroz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Open nominations for Chair of Board of Directors (Election to be held at regular June Board Meeting) SUMMARY As provided in the Board's Rules of Procedures, nominations for the Chair are made at the regular May meeting and remain open until election, which takes place at the June meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Chair will be conducted at the June regular meeting. For new Directors' information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. "G. CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD. A Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Board shall be elected by a majority vote of Directors at the regular meeting in June of each year, and will assume office July 1st. The nominations for Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in May of each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement setting forth their qualifications for the office of Chairperson. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Board of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the June regular meeting. The nominations and election for Vice Chairperson shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Chairperson. The elected Vice Chairperson will assume office July 1st. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Chairperson becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairperson shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairperson and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Directors. In the event the office of Vice Chairperson becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board G1xy.EleepanMBme PgnN Re�'43W3 BwN ApenEe Re�'tlN50Ntem],eoc R W: eYlM Page 1 meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Directors. Subject to the provisions about serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Directors, the Chairperson shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms for which he/she has been elected to the office of Chairperson." PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS GA,a.ddanapnda\ward Agenda RepodaQ002 Board Agenda ReWsMONlem 7 dod R—ned. WOO Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlrg Date To ad.of De. oS/22/D2 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number 9 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Street, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 04/01/02—04/15/02 and 04/16/02—04/30/02 Claim$Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/151'02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 432a4 City of Huntington Beach $ 185,120.00 Construction-Cooperative Pmjec19 Program J-73-City of Huntington Beach 43285 City of Santa Ana 140,219.61 Construction-Cooperative Projects Program J-73-Civic Center Sewer,Santa Ana 43286 Orange County Sanitation District 548.642.52 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 43287 Orange County Water District $13,733.23 Joint GWRS Project J-36 43288 Southern California Edison 76,502.27 Power 43289 Postmaster General 99,032.04 Bulk Melling-User Fee Increase Notifications 43290 A.B.IN.I.P.Attorney Service 89.16 Legal Services-Tram vs.Kovacs 43291 Alrgas Safety 2,429.53 Safety Supplies&Equipment 43292 Appleons Employment Service 6.335.04 Temporary Employment Services 43293 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 3,051.56 Long Distance Telephone Service 43294 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 93.36 Telephone Service 43295 AT&T Wireless Services-Ahlime 4,629.50 Cellular Telephone Service 43296 Battelle 325.00 Lab Meeting Registration 43297 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 4a298 Bondlogletix,L.L.C. 7,800.00 Preparation of Interim Arbitrage Rebate Report for Series 2000 COPS 43299 Boyle Engineering Corporation 384.10 Engineering Services-Develop Process Control Software Templates 43300 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 43301 California Pipeline Inspection 759.60 CCTV Sewer Inspection 43302 Document Control Solutions,Inc. 278.17 Stationery&Office Supplies 43303 Electra-Bond 147.08 Maintenance Supplies 43304 Elliott Bey Design Group 8,296.83 Prof.Services-Preliminary Design&Cost Analysis for Ocean Monitoring Vessel 43305 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 23,012.73 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-Feb.2002 43308 Court Order 526.00 Wage Garnishment 43307 FLW,Inc. 850.45 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43308 City of Huntington Beach 30.19 Water Use 43309 Industrial Metal Supply 299.49 Metal 43310 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 242.29 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 43311 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 2,552.04 Dues Deduction 43312 Lab Support 3,188.00 Temporary Employment Services 43313 MerVac Electronics 68.62 Electrical Pens&Supplies 43314 McMaster-Cam Supply Co. 567.18 Repairs It Maintenance Materials 43319 Metfl r-Toledo 312.50 On-Site Training 43316 Midway Mfg It Machining Co. 11,632.45 Mechanical Pads-Fabricate&Refurbish 43317 Court Order 339,60 Wage Garnishment 43318 Optb Software 7,890.00 Software Meint.,Computer Supplies&Information Technology Meeting Registration 43319 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Garnishment 43320 OCEA 422.86 Dues Deduction 43321 Pacific Bell 50.31 Telephone Services 43322 Could Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 43323 Court Omer 290.00 Wage Garnishment 43324 Peace Officers Council of CA 9D0.00 Dues Deduction 43325 Pdntech Graphic Services,Inc. 17,782.38 Blue Mailers-Rate Increase Notifications 43326 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 10,132.52 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 43327 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 707.28 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43328 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 43329 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 13,014.04 Mechanical Pans,Supplies&Malnt.Materials 43330 Teksystems 1,380.00 Temporary Employment Services Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 4=1 The Umsource Corporation 6.822.15 Office Supplies 43332 United Way 305.0D Employee Contributions 43333 Ver¢on California 1,535.99 Telephone Services 43334 James L.Burror 531.43 Meeling/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 43335 Norman Eckenrode 153.60 MestingtTraining Expense Reimbursement 43336 Kathleen T.MNea 1.828.87 Meelingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 43337 Patrick A.Sullivan 138.19 Meeling7raining Expense Reimbursement 43338 Mark A.Tomko 1,049.26 Meetingrfraining Expense Reimbursement 43339 Yu-LI Tsai 607.58 Meeting?raining Expense Reimbursement 43390 CRWOCB 500.00 Certification for Bushard Trunk Sewer Encroachment 43341 Postmaster General 40,000.00 Postage-Rate Increase Notifications 43342 Archer Western Contractors,Ltd. 125,660.00 Construction-Interplant Microwave Data Trans. Project 43343 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 683,655.23 Professional Sew.J-73-2 43344 Blue Cross of California 228.361.06 Medical insurance Premium 43345 Brown&Caldwell 111.610.35 Engineering Services 2-41 &Study Contract to Eval.Advanced Digestion Processes 43346 Carotlo Engineers 373,851.72 Professional Services P2-66,J-2"&Disinfection Alternatives Research 43347 Cooper Energy Systems 38.364.57 Engine Supplies 43348 CH2M HIII 64.711.03 Professional Services J-714 43349 DlgFTera 269,631.25 Computer Hardware/Software,Maintenance&Support 43350 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 34,719.09 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-March&April 43351 Fake Benefits Insurance Company 41,616.36 Long-Term Disablliry Ins.Premium 43352 Keiser Foundation Heats Plan 33,753.59 Medical Insurance Premium 43353 Kemiron Pacific.Inc. 62,947.95 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 43354 Lee&Ro,Inc. 109,777.06 Professional Services P2-47-3 It J-71-7 43365 Mec Analytical System 71,850.76 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysts J-85 43356 Midway City Sanitary District 340.503.00 Construction-Cooperative Projects Program J-73,Midway Sanitary Diet. 43357 Mike Prich It Sons 169,967.69 Construction-Pacific Coact Hwy.Force Main Repairs 43358 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 42,571.69 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99 43359 Orange County Water District 69,500.01 GAP Water Use NO 10-23-96 43360 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 125,499.61 Engineering Services J-42 43361 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 26,904.87 Caustic Soda&Bleach 43362 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 132,687.60 Diversion Gate Guides,Treffto Slop,Pipe Installation&Repairs at HB Purchase 43363 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 86,976.93 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94,P-179 It J-85 43364 Southern Calif Coastal Water Research 29,OOD.00 Professional Services-Coastal Water Research Project 43365 Tran Consulting Engineers 25,646.00 Engineering Services P7-88 43366 Tula RenchMfagan Fame 74.154.62 Residuals Removal NO 3-29-95 43367 J W Contracting Corporation 1,621,290.00 Construction P2.60 43368 Margate Construction,Inc. 980.618.00 Construction P2-39,P1.37 It J-71-7 43369 Southern Contracting Company 53,694.00 Construction J-33-1-A 43370 Union Bank of California 180,143.00 Construction P2-60,Retention 43371 Urbantec Engineering,Inc. 258.947.01) Construction J-66 43372 Trieu Thien But,Michael F.Smith, 100.000.00 Claim Settlement Tran vs.Kovacs 43373 A-Plus Systems 4.685.72 Nollces&Ads 43374 Ace Glass,Inc. 456.26 Lab Parts It Supplies 43375 Adamson Industries 515.91 Lab Supplies 43376 Air Liquid@ America Corp. 2,630.78 Specialty Gasses 43377 Air Products&Chemicals 6.16 Lab Supplies 43378 Airgas Safety 8,224.53 Safety Supplies E Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT A C � ' Claims Paid From 04/01A72 to 04/1SM2 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43379 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 355.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 43380 Applecne Employment Service 15.537.19 Temporary Employment Services 43381 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 9.135.00 Todclry Testing 43382 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 13,500.00 Toxicity Testing 43383 Ashbrook Corporation 4.310.22 Belt Press Parts&Supplies 43384 Atlantis Pool Care 250.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 43385 Awards&Trophies By Bea 225.33 Plaques 43386 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 64.93 Telephone Service 43387 AWSI 133.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 43388 AWWA 114.00 Membership-American Water Waft Assoc. 43389 Bellantyne,Inc. 23,022.00 Temporary Employment Services 43390 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 20,000.00 Telephone Equipment Service-Bi-Annual Contract 43391 Bell Land Surveying 11,328.91 Prolesslonal Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 43392 BloMedauo Vaek,Inc. 933.91 Lab Pans&Supplies 43393 Bondlogist6c,LLC. 2,000.00 Preparation of Final Arbitrage Rebate Report for Sense"B"1990-92 COPs 43394 Boyle Engineering Corporation 3,573.56 Construction-Contract 6-13 43395 Brenntag West,Inc. 1,572.80 Janitorial Supplies 43396 Cal-Glass,Inc. 121.76 Lab Equipment Servioe 43397 Cdtrol,Inc. 1.183.40 Mechanical Pans&Supplies and Technical Support 43398 Cameron Welding Supply 57.96 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43399 Cathcart Garcia von Langer,Engineers 15,974.18 Engineering Services P2-82 43400 Charles P.Crowley Co. 755.89 Instrument Parts 43401 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 12,375.00 Professional Services-Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures 43402 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 916.63 Electrical Pane&Supplies 43403 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 951.64 Plumbing Supplies 43404 Contract Environmental Service 1,495.71 Professional Services-SCAOMD Testing-Gasoline Storage Tanks 43405 Cooper Energy Services 1,241.38 Engine Supplies 43406 Corporate Express Imaging 86.46 Computer Supplies 43407 Corporate Express 698.78 Office Supplies 43408 Coal Containment Solutions 917.91 Workers Comp Services 43409 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 177.04 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43410 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.954.65 Electrical Para&Supplies 43411 Culligan of Orange County 225.00 Maint.Agreement.Can Gen Water Softener Sys.&Inspection 43412 Cytec Industries 18,696.30 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 43413 California Pipeline Inspection 903.50 CCTV Sewer Inspection 43414 CWEA Membership 280.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 43415 Dan Baker InExcess Awards 2,340.08 Employee Service Award Pins 43416 David's Tree Service 3,700.DD Tree Maint.Service 43417 Dawson Company 263.60 Freight 43418 De Anza Baysloe Village 4,377.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 43419 Diamond H Recognalon 983.30 Employee Service Awards 43420 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 34.16 Electrical Supplies 43421 Eden Equipment Company 1,044.33 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43422 Elect Air 276.19 Air Cylinders 43423 Enchanter,Inc. 4,800.01) Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 43424 Environmental Resource Association 1,142.70 Lab Parts&Supplies 43425 Environmental Science Associates 11,756.30 Prof.Services J40-5 43426 Equisery 1.072.12 Mechanical Pans&Supplies Page 3 017 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43427 ENS Resoureas,Inc. 4,036.15 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 43428 FedEx Corporation 247.28 Air Freight 43429 Fllarsky&Wan L.LP. 2,422.50 Professional Services,SPMT Negotiations 43430 First American Real Estate Solutions 412.00 Orange County Property Information 43431 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,873.11 Lab&Inst.Pans&Supplies 43432 Flo-Systems,Inc. 3,120.91 Pump Supplies 43433 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 601.80 Meeting Supplies 43434 Forestry Suppliers 21.15 Lab Supplies 43435 Fountain Valley Camera 4993 Photo Supplies 43436 Franklin Covey 195.17 Office Supplies 43437 Frazee Paint and Walk:ovenng 242.44 Paint Supplies 43438 Frys Electronics 1.869.53 Computer Supplies 43439 Full Spectrum Analylks 563.23 Instrument Service 43440 Full Spectrum Analylloa,Inc. 3,200.00 Lab Instrument Service 43441 Gareff-Callahan Company 3,211.08 Chemicals 43442 Gauge Repair Service 646.78 Gauge Repair 43443 General Petroleum 3.618.97 Oti It Grasse 43444 Golder west Fence Company 751.57 Chain Link Fencing(J36) 43445 Graphics Press,L.L.C. 230.00 Communications Training Registration 43446 Harbour Engineering Group 236.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43447 Harold Primrose Ice 101.25 Ioe For Samples 43448 Herb's Bleckforest Bakery&Dell 84.00 Meeting Expenses 43449 The Holman Group 1,432.78 Employee Assistance Program Premium 43450 Home Depot 301.78 Small Hardware 43451 Hopkins Technical Products 223.15 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 43452 Hub Auto Supply 293.41 Truck Pads 43453 HummingbW Communications.Ltd. 2,625.10 Software Meint. 43454 I.D.Industries,Inc. 343.61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43455 Idexx 6.045.00 tab Pads It Supplies 43456 Imaging Express 189.61 Printer Maintenance 43457 imaging Plus,Inc. 1,928.37 Printing Service 43468 Industrial Distribution Group 12.242.42 Mechanical Paris It Supplies 43459 Innerline Engineering 6,81260 CCTV Videoing of Tmnkline Sewers 43460 Wine Ranch Water District 7.72 Water Use 43461 J.D.Edwards So.Calif.Users Group 300.00 Membership 43462 Jays Catering 1,240.12 Meeting Expenses 43463 Jensen,Instrument Co. 1,363.78 Inst.Parts It Supplies 43464 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 1,350.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9.90 43465 Karen Monaco&Associates 2,318.75 FIS Support Services 43466 Kevin Orzech 4,362.96 Prof.Services-Analysis for Physical Oceanographic Data 43467 La Ouinta Inn 2,849.64 Reconcilladon User Fee Refund Program 43468 Lab Support 11.724.01 Temporary Employment Services 43469 L.Indsay Engineering Services 1,512.00 Professional Services-Vibration Monitoring 43470 Linjer Company do Gerald Jones 4,251.17 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 43471 Lonnan Education Services 319.00 Air Ouatiry Training Registration 43472 Lucile 177.50 Meeting Expense 43473 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 180.00 Professional Services-Coating Inspection of Digester Gas Storage Tank 43474 Maintenance Technology Corp. 141.75 Mechanical Supplies C Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT A � 1 Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43475 Management Technologies 3,525.00 ProL Sam.-Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit Project Support 43476 Manaa,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 15.000.00 Strategic Planning&Advocacy 43477 MarVac Electronics 151.63 Electrical Pans&Supplies 43478 The Mathwarke,Inc. 1.062.33 Software Maintenance 43479 Mail Chlor,Inc. 9.82 Valves 43480 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 743.03 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43481 Media Clips,Inc. 35.00 Notices&Ads 43482 Medlin Controls Co. 385.44 Instrument Supplies 43483 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 11,480.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43484 Mission Uniform Service 3,795.47 Uniform Rentals 43485 Morton Sall 598.73 Salt 43406 Municipal Equipment Maintenance Assoc. 50.00 Membership 43487 MBC Applied Environmental Sciences 1,420.00 Lab Analyses 434M MDS Consulting 8,985.00 Professional Surveying Services-Various Caphal Projects 43489 MGD Technologies,Inc. 10,200.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 43490 National Business Womens Leadership Assoc. 680.00 Engineering Training Registration 43491 National Fire Protection Association 39.52 Publloation 43492 National Microcanp Services 1.212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 43493 National Plant Services,Inc. 2,550.00 Vacuum Truck Services 43494 Newark Electronics 233.14 Electrical Pans&Supplies 43495 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 7,720.77 Drresel Fuel 43496 Nlnyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 4687.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24.98 43497 Office Delmt Business Services Div. 1,059.22 Office Supplies 43498 Orange County Health Care Agency 9,900.00 2002 Hazardous Waste&Hazardous Malarial Fees 43499 Orange Fluid System Tech.,Inc. 983.00 Fillings 4350D Ortiz Fire Protection 416.00 Service Agreement-Testing&Certification of All Fire Sprinkler Systems at Pits 1 &2 43501 Oxygen Service Company 1,288.81 Specialty Gases 43502 OCB Reprographics 166.96 Printing Service-MO 126/00 43503 P.L.Hawn Company.Inc. 24.911.46 Annual Agreement for Air Filter Media&Related Services 43504 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 43WS Pacific Parts&Controls 2,699.80 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43506 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 79.49 Mechanical Supplies 43507 Parker Supply Company 516.38 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43508 Parts Unlimited 462.80 Truck Supplies 43509 Pickens Fuel Corp. 581101 CNG Program Operational It Maintenance Services 43510 Pilki gton Aerospace 3,27272 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 43511 Polydyne,Inc. 13,06875 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 43512 Port Supply 231.39 Foul Weather Geer for Ocean Monitoring Crew 43513 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 1,046.50 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 43514 Prestige Striping Services,Inc. 1,735.00 Pavement Striping-Traffic Control 43515 Primary Souroe 9,182.06 Office Furniture 43516 Process Equipment Company 3,093.50 Pump&Pump Supplies 43517 Projects Partners 23,881.59 Temporary Employment Services 43518 Property Damage Appraisers 76.00 Vehicle Damage Appraiser Service 43519 Pulzmeister 43.62 Pump Services 43620 PCS Express 440.00 Courier Service 43521 DOS,L.L.C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service 43522 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 1,902.45 Construction-Reroute Gas Una,Install Valves/Flaings at Rebuild Shop Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43523 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kem County Siosolids Consulting Services 43524 Radius Maps 225.00 Update Property Owner Address Listings(1-2-4) 43525 Rainin Instrument Co.,Inc. 499.15 Lab Supplies 43526 Red Wing Shoes 101.29 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 43527 Relimh r Bankers Security Life Ins. 8,603.86 Life Insurance Premium 43528 Refs Rooter 1,492.65 Repair Shower Drains at Pa.2 Maintenance Building 43529 Ryan Heron Products Corp. 74.25 Pump Supplies 43530 RPM Electric Motors 1.960.14 Motors&Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43531 Safety-Kleen 423.06 Pane Cleaning Service 43532 Saybolt L.P. 600.00 Air Analyses 43633 Sears Industrial Saba 94.89 Mechanical Supplies 43534 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 39.96 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 43535 Sigma Chemical Co. 3,661.74 lab Pads&Supplies 43536 Skater,Inc. 769.49 Lab Pads&Supplies 43537 SkillPalh Seminam 199.00 Information Technology Training Registration 43538 So.Cal.Gas Company 3,797.79 Natural Gas 43539 South Coast Environmental Go. 893.21 Gen Gen Emissions Testing Service 43540 Southern California Edison 7.355.13 Power 43541 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 622.41 Instrument Repairs 43542 Strategic Diagnostics,Inc. 1,202.51 Lab Pads&Supplies 43543 Straughan Technical Distribution L.L.C. 625.27 Pump Pans&Supplies 43544 Sunset Industrial Pads 380.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43545 SKC-West,Inc. 1.146.24 Safety Supplies 43546 SM Protective Coatng 2.750.00 Manhole Grading&Coating 43547 STL Sacramento 1,378.00 Lab Analytical Service 43548 Tasew,Inc. 0.786.10 Valves 43549 TerminiK International Co. 460.00 Peal Control 43550 The Orange County Register 561.72 Notices&Ads 43551 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 48.23 Mechanical Supplies 43552 Daily Pilot 268.75 Notices&Ads 43553 Tonys Lock&Safe Service&Sates 153.79 Locks&Keys 43554 Toshiba Inbmational Corporation 241.90 Electrical Supplies 43555 Transcat 1,526.82 Instrument Supplies 43556 Tropical Plus Nursery,Inc. 12,771.61 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11.94 43557 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 232.33 Truck Supplies 43558 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,130.00 tab Services 43559 Teksystems 12.198.00 Temporary Employment Services 43500 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,252.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 43561 Ultra Scientific 217.35 Lab Supplies 43562 United Parcel Service 40.40 Parcel Services 43563 USRIter Westetes Carbon 1.971.83 Filters 43564 Valley Cities Supply Company 226.92 Water Heater 43565 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 11,800.00 Temporary Employment Service 43566 Verizon California 1,437.81 Telephone Services 43567 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 24,070.50 Hydrogen Perorids Specification No:C-044 43568 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 1,486.00 Lab Pads&Supplies 43569 The Wackenhut Corporation 9,052.44 Security Guards 43570 Waste Markets Corp. 21,837.30 Mond.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mat'I.Removal Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT A Claims Paid From 04/01/02 to 04/16/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43571 IMRI 14,300.00 Temporary Employment Services 43572 Westbay Solutions Group 1.660.00 Information Technology Training Registration 43573 Western Switches&Controls,Inc. 358.71 Electrical Supplies 43574 WEF 427.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 43575 Xerox Corporation 213.87 Fair&Copier Leases 43576 The Yakima Company 24.751.18 Residuals Removal M03-22-00 43577 YSI Massachusetts 3,719.57 (2)Meters 43578 California Bank&Trust 5.966.00 Construction J33-1A,Retention 43579 MVP Commercial,Inc. 9.372.00 Construction-Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services,Retention 43580 Olssori Construction,Inc. 13,444.00 Construction-Control Panel&Piping Modifications,Retention 43581 Punchlist Contractors 17,730.00 Construction-Purchasing Conference Room at Pa. 1 43582 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 12.574.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Pit.1 43583 Lauds S.Bluestein 708.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43584 William D.Cassidy 498.13 Meating/freining Expense Reimbursement 43585 Mahn G.England 1,750.00 Meeting/Trelning Expense Reimbursement 43586 Robert P.Ghlrelll 1,078.76 MeetingTraining Expense Reimbursement 43587 David R.Heinz 112.00 Meeting raining Expense Reimbursement 43588 Chades G.Lee 316.02 Meeting raining Expense Reimbursement 43589 Done Phuong 129.43 Meeting raining Expense Reimbursement 43590 Douglas M.Stewart 325.99 Meeting raining Expense Reimbursement 43591 Jonathan K.Thomsic 253.36 MeelingTreining Expense Reimbursement 43592 City of Anaheim 5,088.00 Permit&Inspection Fees for Installation of 19 Flow Meters 43593 City of Fullerton 2,031.00 Permit&Inspection Fees for Installation of 9 Flaw Meters 43594 Employee Activity Committee 765.00 Service Award Expense 43595 Jesus Baez&Dell Computer 1,167.82 Employee Computer Loan Program 43596 Orange County Sanitation District 15,656.04 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 43597 Orange County Sanitation District 1,366.33 Pelt'Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 9,053,777.76 Payroll Disbursements 26285.26413 Employee Paychecks $ 167,038.21 Biweekly Payroll 04/03/02 26414-26416 Inledm Paychecks 5570.79 Termination Paychecks,Director's Paycheck,Reissue Stale Dated Check 71345.71803 Direct Deposit Statements 768,524.74 Biweekly Payroll 04/03/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 941,133.74 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 118,987.14 Societe Generale March Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 45,250.82 March Interest Payment on Sens 19M Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 164.217.96 Total Claims Paid 04/01/02-04/15/02 $ 10,759,129.66 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT A E , r Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 43598 American Express $ 39,980.14 Purchasing Card Program,Mlac.Supplies&Services 43599 Mike Prlich&Sons 172,378.63 Construction-Force Main Repairs at Biller Point Pump Station 43600 Orange County Sanitation District 465,893.26 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 43601 Tule Ranchruagan Farms 37,098.50 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 43602 Vapex,Inc. 575,080.00 (28)Vapex Scrubber Monitor/Controllers 43603 Angas Safety 120.15 Safety Supplies 436D4 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 16.75 Telephone Service 43605 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 43606 Boutwell,Fay&Fabricant,L.L.P. 1.412.10 Legal Services-401a Plan 43607 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 43608 Compressor Components Of California 1,745.55 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43609 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 150.82 Electrical Supplies 43010 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,781.02 Plumbing Supplies 43611 County of Orange.Auditor Controller 420.00 Environmental Health Services Re Newport Sewerlirre Failure on 2-21-01 43812 CASA 300.00 Communications Meeting Registration 43613 CWEA Membership 140.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 43614 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 12,184.32 Server Maintenance 43615 DSS Solutions,Corp 19,600.00 Business Objects Training 43616 Electro-Test,Inc. 23,700.00 Maintenance Services-(5)Portable Generators at PH.2 43817 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 43618 Fri,Inc. 315.52 Printed Forms-W2's It Envelopes 43619 Richard Goode 80.00 User Fee Refund Be Septic Tanks 43820 Robert or Janice Hanson S54.21 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43621 Industrial Metal Supply 2,899.92 Metal 43622 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 2,637.73 Dues Deduction 43623 ISSA Headquarters 180.00 Membership-Information Systems Security Association 43624 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 13.912.57 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 43625 McMasler-Carr Supply Co. 482.07 Door Repair 43626 Albert or Keely Ann Medina 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43627 Court Order 339.50 Wage Garnishment 43628 National Plant Services,Inc. 6,480.00 Vacuum Truck Services 43629 Network Associates 188.33 Soll Maintenance-Magic 43630 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Garnishment 43831 OCEA 413.61 Dues Deduction 43632 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 43633 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 43634 Pews Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction 43635 Pon Supply 242.22 Safety Supplies 43636 Mr.George Pulliam 1,034.02 User Fee Refund Be Septic Tanks 43637 Liese Rego 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43638 George L.Robertson 132.57 Meeting/tmining Expense Reimbursement 43639 Rutan It Tucker,L.L.P. 97.67 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 43640 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 367.25 Hand Cleaner 43641 Eric or Stephanie Simon 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43642 Court Omer 721.50 Wage Garnishment 43643 So.Cal.Gas Company 9,782.79 Natural Gas 43644 Southern California Edison 1,829.44 Power Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43645 Voided Check - - 43646 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 264.06 Mechanical Supplies 43647 United Way 205.00 Employee Contributions 43648 Vedzon California 3,621.34 Telephone Services 43649 Voided Check - - 43650 Nicholas J.Amontes 286.27 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43651 Kelly J.Christensen 200.37 Meating/rraining Expense Reimbursement 43652 Steven R.DeWiide 149.25 MeefinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 43653 David R.Heinz 760.62 Meeffng/rralning Expense Reimbursement 43654 Midam Loyo 1.171.51 Meeting/haining Expense Reimbursement 43655 Canh 0.Nguyen 1,212.09 Meeting?raming Expense Reimbursement 43656 Bdan K.Reed 104.28 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 43657 Simon L.Watson 163.00 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 43658 Paula A.Zeller 998.81 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 43659 State Water Resources Control Board 250.00 Permit Fee-Notice of Intent 1.2.4 43660 Air Products&Chemicals 25,D45.99 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-15-89 43661 Boyle Engineering Corporation 159,104.31 Engineering Services 1.2.4 43662 SP Energy Company 106.593.95 Natural Gas 43663 Carollo Engineers 34.416.25 Professional Services-Microflltration Demonstration Project 43664 Carollo Engineers 56.847.41 Engineering Services-P1-71 &Treatment Processes Study 43665 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 159,834.20 Computers-(75)Dell Optiplax&(2)Dell Precision 43666 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 70.553.36 Ferric Chloride NO 9.27-95 43667 Matrix Service Corp. 68.450.40 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Low Pressure Gas Holder at Pit.2 43668 Mike Pnich&Sons 104,748.03 Construction-Force Main Repairs at Sitter Point Pump Station 43669 Order,Degremont,Ire. 96,234.40 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Headworks Improvements&Retention 43670 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 62,714.00 Manhole Rehabilitation and Street Repairs 43671 Polydyne,Inc. 53,944.83 Cationic Polymer MO3-11-92 43672 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 29,749.0 Sewering Cleaning 43673 Souther California Edison 96,015.87 Power 43674 Syna0ro Technologies,Inc. 60.586.68 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 43675 SPEC Services,Inc. 28.870.31 Engineering Services J-33.1 43676 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 74,790.40 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 43677 U.S.Metro Group,Inc. 89,940.24 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance Services at Pits.1&2 43678 Undersea Graphics,Inc. 40,000.00 Contract Service-Ouffall Inspection 43679 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 32,1135.94 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 43680 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 101,378.82 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 43681 The Yakima Company 61,869.21 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 43682 Ark Construction Company 76,482.00 Construction PI-62 43683 Ace Glass,Inc. 88.19 Lab Parts&Supplies 43684 Acoustical Material Services 209.13 Ceiling Tile 43685 Adamson Industries 1,647.72 Lab Supplies 43686 Great American Printing Co. 123.84 Stationery&Office Supplies 43687 Advanced Cooling Technologies 420.00 Air Conditioning Service 43688 Advanced Power 8 Controls,L.L.C. 12,743.81 Electrical Pump Control Panel 43689 Aaaro Company 428.50 Safety Supplies 43690 Alrhome Express 136.18 Alt Freight 43691 Airgas Safety 4,475.67 Safety supplies 43692 Alta-Robbins,Inc. 56.87 instrument Supplies .e Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT B f Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43693 American Airlines 8,754.60 Travel Services 43694 American Training Resources,Inc. 429.56 Video 43695 Ametek Rotron 5,325.45 (2)Vac Fans 43696 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 13,600.00 Tod*Testing 43697 Arch Wireless - 2,775.40 Pagers,Service&Airtime 43698 Asbury Environmental Services 395.00 Waste Oil Removal 43699 Aspen Publishers,Inc. 63.49 Publication 43700 Atkinson-Baker,Inc. 214.25 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43701 Automatic Timing&Controls 428.06 Repairs&Maintenance Services 43702 AMSA 675.00 Technical Services Meeting Registration 437M American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 970.72 Telephone Service 43704 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 208.33 Telephone Service 43705 AT&T Wireless Services-Acme 63.21 Cellular Telephone Service 43706 Ballanlyne,Inc. 3,828.00 Temporary Employment Services 43707 Basler Electric Company 1,480.59 Electrical Supplies 43708 Battery Specialties 1,672.62 Batteries 43709 Bell Land Surveying 10,725.00 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 43710 Bently Nevada Corporation 574.31 Instrument Paris&Supplies 43711 Bermingham Controls 512.64 Valves 43712 Sorthwick,Guy,Beaenhausen 1,053.03 Professional Services-P2-84 43713 Brian A.Ewald,M.D.,Inc. 1,649.50 Professional Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43714 Brown&Caldwell 15,653.47 Engineering Services-J-25.6 43715 California Relocation Services,Inc. 253.12 Office Moving Services 43716 Southern Celffomia Marine Institute 12.430.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 43717 Camol,Inc. 1,403.98 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43718 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 2,083.33 Professkmal Services-Workers Compensation Claims 43719 Capitol Enquiry,Inc. 120.37 Publication 43720 Carl Warren&Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 43721 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 5,158.50 Engineering Services-Design Mixing System for Anaerobic Selector Study 43722 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 2,220.48 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 43723 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 12,375.00 Professional Services-Safety&Emerg.Response Procedures 43724 Voided Check - - 43725 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 2,736.02 Elecbcal Parts&Supplies 43726 Consumers Pipe&Supply Gm 1,517.44 Plumbing Supplies 43727 Cooper Energy Services 4,354.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43728 Cooper Energy Systems 10.047.27 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43729 Coordinated Wire Rope&Rigging 1,482.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43730 Corporate Express 1,351.61 Office Supplies 43731 Cost Containment Solutions 943.85 Worker's Comp.Services 43732 County Wholesale Electric Co. 2.295.86 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43733 Cummins Allison Corp. 983.24 Accounting Equipment Maim.Agreement 43734 Cyclus Envirosyslems,Inc. 7,142.61 Professional Services-Anodc Gas Flotation Process 43735 CA Emissions Program 22.20 Vehicle Electronic Transmission Services 4373E CWEA Membership 70.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 43737 Dapper Tire Co. 256.82 Thick Tires 43738 Del Mar Analytical 3,488.00 BlDsollds Analysis 437M Marwranjan Dub 1,034.0E Leer Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 43740 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 1,158.97 Electrical Supplies Page 3 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43741 E.G.Hollers Son,Inc. 58.47 Electrical Supplies 43742 Eborline Instruments 415.56 Instrument Maint. 43743 Ecology Control Industries 4,170.96 Hazardous Waste Disposal 43744 Ed Ruzak&Associates,Inc. 2,306.25 Legal Services-Claim of Tran vs.Kovacs 43745 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 2,852.00 Medical Screening 43746 Electra-Bond 23,424.85 Bell Press Rollers Recoating 43747 Elliott Bay Design Group 4,276.46 Prof.Services-Preliminary Design It Cost Analyses for Ocean Monitoring Vessel 43748 Enchanter,Inc. 4,000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24.95 43749 Enecon Corporation 710.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43750 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 10,000.00 Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Program Training 43751 Environmental Resource Center 399.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 43752 Exlerminetics of Southern California 1,300.00 Pest Control 43753 EPA,Inc. 3,958.50 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43764 FedEX Corporation 199.95 Air Freight 43755 Filaraky,&Waft,L.L.P. 1,852.50 Professional Services,SPMT Negotiations 43756 Filter Supply Company 2,533.76 Fibers 43757 First American Real Estate Solutions 259.15 Orange County Property Information 43758 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 7.275.36 Lab Pads&Supplies 43759 Flo-Systems,Inc. 2,954,21 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 43760 Forestry Suppliers 319.39 Lab Supplies 43761 Foss Environmental 4,469.00 Caustic Tank Cleaning 43762 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 461.50 Truck Wash Tickets 43763 Franklin Covey 36.19 Office Supplies 43764 FNs Electronics 386.24 Computer Supplies 43765 Ga0ab-Callahan Company 54.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 43766 General Petroleum 13,669.57 Unleaded Gasoline 43767 George Yardley Go. 69.36 Lab Supplies 43768 Gerry Aster, R.N.,M.S.,C.R.C. 1,025.63 Consulting Services-Claim of Tran vs.Kovacs 43769 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. 1,162.62 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43770 Gold Systems,Inc. 3,726.25 Professional Services-Data Migration&STORET Interface Application 43771 Goldenwest Fence Company 630.00 Chain Link Fencing-Pit.1 43772 Goldenwest Window Service 2,742.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.*990015 43773 W W Grainger,Inc. 2,803.96 Electrical Pans It Supplies 43774 Graybar 130.69 Freight Charges 43775 HFScientific 177.42 Chemicals 43776 Hecker Equipment Company 1,474.85 Truck Repairs,Parts&Supplies 43777 Hach rtlo Penton Industries 1.190.47 Ins.Pans&Supplies 43778 Hatch&Kirk.Inc. 7,331.14 Engine Generator Control Supplies 43779 Herb's Blackforest Bakery It Deli 152.00 Meeting Expenses 43780 Home Depot 378.59 Small Hardware 43781 Hopkins Technical Products 6.869.83 Pumps&Pump Supplies 43782 C.Cowles&Go. 187.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43783 Imaging Express 166.49 Printer Maintenance 43784 Industrial Distribution Group 1,460.11 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 43785 Industrial Metal Supply 632.92 Metal 43786 Innerline Engineering 410.00 Professional Services-CCTV Vldeoing of Trunklines 43787 Inteq Group 1,295.00 Source Control Training Registration 43788 Intratek Computer,Inc. 1,411.20 Network&Server Maintenance aC ., Page 4 0l 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43789 Ionics Instrument Business Group 2,053.02 Lab Maintenance Services 43790 Imn Mountain 311.33 Storage Fee-Engineering Documents 43791 Irvine Ranch Water District 50.32 Water Use 43792 IABC 201.37 Publication 43793 IBM Corp. 2,417.79 IBM AS1400 Lease 43794 Associated Readymlx Concrete 529.23 Concrete 43795 IOMA,Inc. 26&95 Subscription 43796 ITG Tech 0,480.00 Professional Services-Help Desk Administration 43797 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 4,067.77 Specialty Oases 43798 J.L.Winged Company 2,754.12 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 43799 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 4,050.29 Professional Services-Collection System Gas Flaps 43800 Jays Catering 376.08 Meeting Expenses 43801 Jensen Instrument Co. 1,000.86 Electrical Parts&Supplies 43802 K.P.Lintlslrom,Inc. 6,960.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12.9-90 43803 Kelly Paper 102.15 Paper 43804 Kindness General Contractors,Inc. 3,625.D0 Construction-Concrete Foundation Rebuild Shop 43805 Kuser&Harris 269.10 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43808 KOCE-Real Orange 23.95 Video 43807 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 102.3E Salary Supplies 43808 Law OBlces of Kinkle,Rodiger&Spriggs 14.112.19 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43809 Law/Crandall 701.00 Professional Service;-Soil Testing P-182 43810 Ulecom-Salary,Inc. 3,760.45 Ins.Parts&Supplies 43811 Liner Company c/o Gerald Janes 4.213.94 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 43812 Luccrs 81.25 Meeting Expense 43813 M.J.Schiff&Associeres,Inc. 2,207.95 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 43814 Management Technologies 6,675.0D Professional Services-Renewal of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit 43815 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 668.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43916 MCRay Industries,Inc. 1,813.23 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43817 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 130.00 Ins.Parts&Supplies 43818 Med-Tox,Inc. 275,00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 43819 Media Clips,Inc. 111.00 Notices 43820 Medlin Controls Co. 1,564.23 Instrument Supplies 43821 Metal Finishing 68.00 Subscription 43822 Midway Mig&Machining Co. 6,908.22 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 43023 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 130A l Window 43824 Mission Uniform Service 4,441.08 Uniform Rentals 43825 Mitchell Instrument Co. 767.10 Ins.Parts&Supplies 43826 MCR Technologies,Inc. 1,642.87 Ins.Parts&Supplies 43a27 MOD Technologies,Inc. 18,100.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 43828 MISCO Southwest 467.21 Pump 43829 Neal Supply Co. 1,477.47 Plumbing Supplies 43830 NelVersant of Southern California 19,327.90 Human Resources Security System Improvements 43831 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 160.00 O&M Training Registration 43832 Newark Electronics 739.98 Electrical Supplies 43833 Nicholas Chevrolet 24,355.59 (1)2002 Utility Truck 43834 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 61.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 4305 The Norco Companies 156.00 Mall Delivery Service 43836 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 125.85 Traffic Regulation Sign Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43837 NAB Associates,Inc. 1,495.00 Lab Services 438W Office Depot Business Services Div. 868.94 Office Supplies 43839 Oxygen Service Company 460.54 Specialty Gases 43840 OCB Reprographics 3,933.54 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 43641 OCE-USA,Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 43842 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 450.91 Filters 43843 Pacific Bell 851.58 Telephone Services 43844 Pacific Mechanical Systems 1,024.66 Mechanical Pads 8 Supplies 43845 Pool Pena 8 Controls 4,238.93 Computer Hardware/Soft"re 8 Electrical Supplies 43846 Pacific Slates Chemical,Inc. 1.787.63 Murlelic Acid 43847 Parker Supply Company 1,054.25 Mechanical Parts B Supplies 43848 Pearpolnt,Inc. 8.113.58 (1)Pearpolnt P372 Camera System w/M.nitor-Sewerlme Inspection Equipment 43849 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 12,652.45 Sodium Hypochlorite 43850 Power Design 9.546.66 Electrical Supplies 43851 Poorer Systems Testing 4,700.00 Electrical Equipment 43852 Power Bros.Machine,Inc. 335.00 Mechanical Maiot. 438M Praxalr,Inc. 9.87 Lab Supplies 43854 Prestige Striping Services,Inc. 990.00 Striping-Construction Management Parking Lot 43855 Primary Source 6,088.59 Office Furniture 43856 Projects Partners 21,363.40 Temporary Employment Services 43857 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 795.42 Pump Supplies 43858 Putzmelster 1,50.98 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 43859 COB,L.L.C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service 43860 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,299.70 Trash Removal 43861 Realllme Systems Corporation 21,593.76 Professional Services-Supervisory Control 6 Data Acquisition Softvrbre Upgrade 43862 Rot.Rooter 476.41 Drain Repairs 43863 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 400.94 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies 43864 Republic Engines 310.02 Motor 43865 RMS Engineering 8 Design,Inc. 4,700.00 Prof.Sam.-Design Removable Vaud Screens for Headaurks Metering Facility 43866 RPM Electric Motors 3,208.88 Electrical Parts,Supplies 8 Repairs 43867 Safetycare,Irlc. 210.11 Video 43868 SchWng America,Inc. 4,908.68 Mechanical Pans 6 Supplies 43869 Schwing America,Inc.-Training 975.00 Mechanical Maintenance Training Registration 43870 Science Applications Intl.Corp. 7,194.75 Ocean Monitoring MO 8-8-94 43871 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 36.44 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 43872 Sewer Equipment Company of America 308.83 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 43873 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 85.02 Hand Cleaner 43874 Shepherd Machinery Co. 287.47 Mechanical Pans 6 Supplies 43875 Shureluck Sales A Engineering 3,460.82 Mechanical Parts 6 Supplies 43876 Aldrich Chemical Co. 298.29 Lab Supplies 43877 Sign-a-Rama 969.76 Printing 43878 SkillPam Seminars 99.00 Lab Training Registration 43879 Southern California Edison 28.12 Power 43M Sperling Inst.do Patten Corporate 2,518.01 (1)Flow Meter 43881 Spex Ceniprep,Inc. 234.88 Lab Supplies 43882 Spherion Corporation 1.959.37 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43883 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 235.32 Office Supplies 43884 Sunsel Industrial Parts 1,411.12 Mechanical Pans 6 Supplies o , Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT B Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43885 Super Chem Corporation 4117.63 Chemicals 43886 Themes Elemental 333.85 Lab Parts&Supplies 43887 Osprey Marine Management 1,050.00 Lab Services 43898 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 2,365.34 Mechanical Supplies 43889 Tran Consulting Engineers 4,564.56 Engineering Services PI-88 43890 The Trane Company 91.72 Electrical Supplies 43891 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 57.53 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 43892 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 136.18 Truck Supplies 43893 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 50.00 Lab Services 43894 Tuff Shed,Inc. 1,500.00 Relocation of Storage Shed 43895 Tuthill Energy SystemsNenlilation 4,360.70 Ventilation Parts&Supplies 43896 TCH Associates,Inc. 1,969.18 Lab Supplies 43897 Teksystems 2,199.00 Temporary Employment Services 43898 U.S.Filler Corporation 300.00 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 43599 U.S.Perodde 18.800.24 Prof.Services-Collection Sys.Odor&Corrosion Chemical Add.Demo.Study 43900 Union Bank of California 3,717.15 Banking Services 43901 United Parcel Service 1,SS7.10 Parcel Services 43902 Naval Post Graduate School 11,517.25 Professional Services J-85 43903 Universal Specialties,Inc. 392.22 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43904 UC Regents 595.00 Salary&Emergency Response Training Registration 43905 UCI Regents 19.302.80 Professional Services J45 43906 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 55.30 Filters 43907 Velco Instruments Co.,Inc. 134.19 Lab Supplies 43908 Vellen Safety Supply Company 502.28 Safety Supplies 43909 Valley Cities Supply Company 559.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 43910 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 8,400.00 Temporary Employment Service 43911 Vapex,Inc. 23,845.00 (1)Seminal Basic Unit,Sensor&Pump 43912 Varian Associates,Inc. 77.80 Lab Supplies 43913 Vector 582.50 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43914 Vector Scientific 11.653.30 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 43915 Verizon California 862.71 Telephone Services 43916 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,365.24 Vision Service Premium 43917 VW R Scientific Products Corporation 5,282.27 Lab Parts&Supplies 43918 The Wackenhut Corporation 13,170.20 Security Guards 43919 Waste Markets Corp. 10,773.05 Maim.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Marl.Removal 43920 Waters Corporation 4,878.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 43921 Wade Sanitary Supply 53.79 Janitorial Supplies 43922 Western Switches&Controls,Inc. 17,222.14 Electrical Pens&Supplies-Headworks Fans 43923 WEF 296.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 43924 WRM 2002 690.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration 43925 Xerox Corporation 10,110.68 Copler&Fax Leases 43926 Mike Prllch&Sons 13.424.68 Construction-Junction Structure Upgrade 43927 Punchlist Contractors 17,730.00 Construction-Purchasing Bldg.Cont.Room,Pit.1 43928 Gerardo Amezcua 576.59 Meeting/fralning Expense Reimbursement 43929 Catherine M.Biele 769.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43930 Thomas M.Blends, 700.62 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43931 Peter H.Brown 259.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 43932 Jennifer M.Cabral 119.13 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Pape 7 of 8 EXHIBIT 8 Claims Paid From 04/16/02 to 04/30/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 43933 George A Charade 664.62 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 43934 Peter Chaffs 555.83 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 43935 Kelly J.Christensen 710.09 Meetingri-raining Expense Reimbursement 439M Thomas D.Dodderer 564.83 Meating/r ralning Expense Reimbursement 43937 Timothy D.Foley 330.91 Meeling/rmining Expense Reimbursement 43938 John G.Gonzalez 446.32 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimbursement 43939 Gun V.Shelp 685.50 MeetingRmining Expense Reimbursement 43940 Dale E.Sparks 409.98 MeetinlyTraming Expense Reimbursement 43941 Joseph F.Vellons 465.83 Meeling/rraining Expense Reimbursement 43942 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 255.00 Sevrer Service Fee Administration 43M JAMS/ENDISPUTE 525.00 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 439" Orange County Sanitation District 53821 Party Cash Reimb. 43945 Robert C.Thompson 1,475.93 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrems S 3,910,328.97 Pavmll Disbursements 26417-26524 Employee Paychecks It 160,279.11 Bnvaekly Payroll 04117102 26628-26628 Interim Paycheck 2,022.64 Termination Paycheck 71804-72260 Direct Deposit Statements 799,546.90 BWeekly Payroll 04/17/02 Total Payroll Disbursements Is 951,848.65 Ware Transfer Payments State Street Bank 4 Trust Co.of CA $ 40,814.36 April Interest Payment on Series 2000 A a B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments is 40,814.36 Total Claims Paid 04/1SM2.04/30/02 S 4,812,9B1.88 Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT B e BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To 6O.aUlr. + srrdoz AGENDA REPORT Iem Number Item Numbe 1 a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-24—SOBELANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition from Gene Sobel requesting annexation of 0.505 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Via Vista Drive and Cooks Corner in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-08, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-24 - Sobel Annexation). SUMMARY • OCSD received a request from Gene Sobel to annex 0.505 acres to OCSD. This property will be annexed into Revenue Area 2. • Mr. Sobel's property is located within the boundaries of the City of Anaheim, but outside the boundaries of OCSD and needs to be annexed. • Mr. Sobel's septic system is no longer working property and will connect to an existing City of Anaheim sewer in Via Vista Drive. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties, Board approved and effective March 14, 1989. Under this Tax Exchange, OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of$8,066 includes the following: LAFCO Processing Fee $ 1,150 OCSD Processing Fee 500 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee 300 CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee 43 OCSD house connection fee (4 bedrooms) 2,165 Annexation Acreage Fee 3.90g TOTAL ANNEXATION AND SEWER CONNECTION FEE $ 8,066 BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption will be filed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map RLC:sa G9wp.dtatagenda)BOard Agenda Report I2002 Board Agenda Repods\050ZItem 10(a).Sobel Annex.doc R—..a. WWI Page 2 - EXHHSIT "A" (OCSD-24) Sobel Annexation No. DA 02-04 1 to the Orange County Sanitation District 2 3 That portion of land situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, being that 4 piece of land shown as Parcel 3 on a map filed in Book 71, Page 18 of Records of Surveys,in the Office 5 of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: 6 Beginning at an angle point in the boundary line of the Orange County Sanitation District 7 (OCSD)as established in the"Joujon-Roche Annexation No. 78 to the County Sanitation District No.2" 8 said point being the westerly comer of said annexation,a tie to said point bears North 380 l8'01"East 9 3014.19 fret from Orange County Horizontal Control Station GPS No. 3255,having a coordinate value 10 (U.S. Survey foot)of North 2235118.528 and East 6102122.533,based upon the California Coordinate ii System(CCS 83),Zone VI, 1983 NAD( 19,91.35 epoch OCS GPS Adjustment)as said GPS No. 3255 is 12 shown on Tract No. 15565 filed in Book 802,pages 44-46 of Miscellaneous Maps of Records of said 13 County; 14 THENCE,along said"Annexation No. 78"and"Annexation No. 17-Country Hill Road to the County 15 Sanitation District No. 2"in a generally southeasterly and southwesterly direction to the southerly comer 16 of Parcel 3 of said map filed in Book 71, Page 18 of Records of Surveys;thence, leaving said existing 17 boundary North 39039'02"West 200.94 feet along the southwesterly line of said Parcel 3 and its 18 northwesterly prolongation to the centerline of a private road now known as Via Vista,a road 40 feet in 19 width, said point being South 50e20'58"West 100.00 feet from the point of beginning;thence,North 20 50e20'58"East 100.00 feet along said centerline to the Point of Beginning. 21 22 The above described parcel of land contains 0.505 acres,more or less. 23 All as shown on Exhibit"B"attached hereto and by this reference, made a part thereof. 24 25 Unless otherwise noted,all bearings and distances are ground and are based upon the California 26 Coordinate System(CCS 83), Zone VI, 1993 NAD (1991.33 EPOCH OCS GPS Adjustment). To obtain 27 grid distances, multiply the ground distances by 0.99997413. Page 1 of EXHIBU"A^ (OCSD-24)Sobel Annexation No.DA 02-04 I to the Orange County Sanitation District 2 3 This document was prepared by me or 4 5 under my direction and supervision. yEr,31" Dated thisLS day of l4 /L ,zooz °P• 7Ar 8 f '.ice � ,Xle - - `��Ho.82540 Fr OF CALF P 9 Michael K. SuOivan L.S. 6254 My license expires 6-30-02 to 11 12 13 This document does meet the approval of AN D 3 N CANgs9 14 the Orange County Surveyor's Office rtt _U O 15 Dated this"n day of P'R 1 L 2002 a�5 08 16 17 OF CALF Johp7Aws, Cowry Surveyor L.S.4408 Is M 1' rrse expires 9-30-0S 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 27 Page 2 ot2 EXHIBIT "BT' (OCS0-24)SOSEL ANNEXATION OA 02.2a TO THE ORANGE CgMTYSANRAT/ON DISTRICT pITME GTYOFAMMMCd/MYpppp ..STATEOFCALF IM as SURVEYORS STATEMEM: LINE TASLE \ \\ / �' q. Ake,rAr�IpyNo.\Ta` WMRIAVDER[Nb��P�IMEOer ('F.ayIYlNoa(6��C} t3 NA'J99S Y12�O.W \\ \ fy(.�y�. �' � � �OI. �` At to MYUCENSEEX%REa L.]POY Yj. MM.aLM / Q Q No. M-wY ANNEINT°N• To=Ntt µITMICM MMICT NC.] nr �ql COUNTYSURVEYOR'SSTATEMENf: i / .T(j\\\ 4 1 �op, TNJPRCP0.5.LLCCESMEErTMEARRgOVALOF ME j'Lra j Si \ a• ha +o olvNgaooLN,.TY ywvaroRs oraTCA naa Emz � �, \\ QQ' f` �`O a a,a emauruwoATE�osmos N 9t 7 Dv.taus � w.Na � NOTES: ��' \\ APN.Yb/AtJa LEGEND: a:% \ rNI Onmms roNTAurs O.sasACREs. � WON:1TH90C8 NONlIIWMLCWIIRML �\� %1150RMMU3 8TA11JNABP42°NINE°RFIS6 pF 11H: M UWESSOMFFWISE NJIEa,NLaFARNS3 AM0 M4NlECdMMSURVE1Wi / / DISTANCES CNIHAS EM091TMEGROWAJ aIaEa NPCN LJ EtlSTbp QNN3ECWNIYSYAMTONdSINILT GF3 N xaslave •T� THEGIIPoNNNCWNOWAIESYSTE.1/CGS UI.ZJIIE' arArtxATrcwew,Nawr .NO. E S M.M.2.M3802/ OETaMUINONaMTMG AE MUIiw�ora orMENO,ro PER M. N0. IOF CANYON N.M. R AA-AD OISTANCES91WMA Il"..iNMA COR A OT flOT bN ROAD �t `. d\r•' NEN'AHIENIKW adMMRY AND NA CORRAL IN TIF Cltt OF.W.WDN BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.or Dir. s zz oz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 10(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: SPECIFICATION NO. 9900-05 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 100535-08, issued to OCB Reprographics for Specification No. 9900-05, for an additional amount of$14,000, for a total amount not to exceed $124,000, providing for additional copying services. SUMMARY • Outside blueprinting, photocopying, and related services are used for the purposes of high-volume reproduction of engineering construction project plans for bidding, and various reports and binding services required during the year that cannot be performed economically with the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) copying equipment. • OCB Reprographics has just finished the first one-year time extension of their contract that expired on January 31, 2002. • Due to unanticipated printing costs that were discovered in the annual summary report submitted by OCB Reprographics, Staff recommends that the Blanket Purchase Order be increased by$14,000 to cover these printing costs for invoices the District had not yet received through January 31, 2002. All invoices have been accounted for and this additional change order is the final increase in the Blanket Purchase Order amount for that year's contract. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The contract for reprographic services is a Blanket Purchase Order and is charged initially to the Joint Operating fund. The Budget allocation is reassigned to the Capital Project or overhead number for which the work is requested at the time service is provided. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) G",ft�Q.ftB A .W Reeo V=B WAWd.R.q WWNIem lgE)OCB flag A. RMeed B(M9B Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Consolidating purchase of copy services and awarding an annual contract to a single vendor through the formal bidding process has resulted in a reduction of staff time, and paperwork in individual ordering and invoice processing for payment of these services each time they are required. OCB Reprographics was awarded a one-year contract by the Board of Directors on January 26, 2000, for a gross annual amount not to exceed $100,000 for all services bid under Specification No. 9900-05, with an option to renew up to four, one-year extensions. OCB Reprographics has been issued a second time extension under Blanket Purchase Number 100536-OB for the period February 1, 2002 through January 31, 2003, by the Purchasing Department for an amount not to exceed $100,000, as previously approved by the Board of Directors on January 26, 2000. ALTERNATIVES There are no known cost efficient alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None JDH:JEP:sa c%nftb GenOa lAp Reps Q�Boom AQ RepvtdN50Ste W(b)O Repodx Re„:<d: BABA Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebng Date TOBd.of M. s12z 0z AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 10(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Risk Manager SUBJECT: SUMMONS & COMPLAINT RE PALL CORPORATION V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file summons and complaint re Pall Corporation v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 02CC06622, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY Please see attached memo dated 5115102 from General Counsel. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This Rem has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CECIA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Memo from General Counsel. GGS:MW:BG Page 1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORVORITIOR MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: May 14, 2002 RE: Pall Corporation v. Orange County Water District, Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court No. 02CCO6622 On May 14, 2002, the Orange County Sanitation District was served with a summons and complaint filed on behalf of Pall Corporation, alleging that the contract to construct specialized equipment and provide materials and supplies relating to microfiltration equipment for the Groundwater Replenishment System ("GWRS") Project was improperly awarded to the lowest bidder. As the Directors are aware, all contracts relating to the GWRS Project are awarded by and made and entered into with the Orange County Water District. This Office will be reviewing the files, records, and documents relating to the bid protest and final award of the contract. At this point in time, however, it is recommended that this matter be referred to General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District, as necessary. It is recommended that a joint defense of OCSD and OCWD be undertaken with single legal counsel, so as to avoid conflicting positions and the payment of double fees and costs. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:pj cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. Streed Mr. D.A. Ludwin Mr. M. White mnda q 1 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, April 24, 2002 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Norm Eckenrode, Chair Don Hughes Shirley McCracken, Vice Chair Randy Fuhrman Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Doug Korthof Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Don Bassett, Montgomery Watson Harza Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee Jim Silva,County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, General Manager Directors Absent: Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services None David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Jennifer Cabral, Public Information Specialist Andrei loan, Project Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Doug Korthof spoke on the efforts to defeat the 301(h)waiver and the need for secondary treatment followed by tertiary treatment. Mr. Randy Fuhrman discussed his proposal for increasing user fees at a faster rate to reduce the amount of future debt financing. He suggested that the Steering Committee consider planning for known and anticipated initiatives in the future now. He also asked that consideration be given to beneficial reuse of all the water as well as biosolids. General Manager Blake Anderson responded that staff will evaluate Mr. Fuhrman's proposal to ramp up user fees and a report will be presented to the FAHR Committee at a future meeting. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the March 27, 2002 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 April 24, 2002 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Eckenrode reported on the Environment Safety and Toxics Materials Committee's AB 1969 hearing he and Blake attended in Sacramento on Tuesday, April 23. He was disappointed in the proceedings, specifically in the amount of time allowed for the opponents to speak. It appears that the bill will be an unfunded mandate at the cost of about$400,000,000. Blake also reported on his testimony and the testimony of others on behalf of the District. The bill must go to the full Assembly and then to the Senate through one or two committees. Chair Eckenrode announced that there is a tour of the water district and a briefing on GIN RS on Friday and he will be attending along with Lynn Daucher and Ken Maddox. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson and staff reported on several issues, as follows. A. Grand Jury Report on 20 Meter Study Mr. Anderson explained that the 20 Meter Study was conducted in 1996 to determine whether the plume field from the ouffall was impacting surface waters from the beach to the three-mile limit. The results were never released, though they were reported to the Regional Water Quality Control Board, EPA and others at a meeting held on September 3, 1997.. The Grand Jury investigation of this incident resulted in a report on their findings and included seven recommendations, all dealing with the issue of open communication and reporting. Blake indicated that several of the recommendations had already been done and that the others would be implemented to provide transparency. Lisa Murphy, communications manager, reported that the District sent out a press release and several newspapers have indicated they will be reporting on the issue. B. Maddox Bill (AB1969) This was discussed earlier in the meeting. C. Onshore Investigation Report Bob Ghirelli, director of technical services, reported that the directors have a copy of the executive summary of this report in their Board meeting folders. This report, prepared by OCSD staff, details the results of a survey of all-known possible onshore contamination sources in the Huntington Beach area. Recommendations are outlined in the report. Several of these are in the jurisdiction of the county, cities of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach, as well as State Parks,the Regional Board and the OC Health Care Agency. This report has been released to the press and will be one of the discussion items at the Special May 15 Board meeting. D. Telephone Survey Results Lisa Murphy provided an update to the committee on the information that will be presented at the Board Meeting by our consultant. E. SARI Relocation Project Status/Expert Panel Report Blake Anderson provided the background on the project. A panel of five experts met and reviewed the project and evaluated the expanded alternatives study. Andrei loan, project manager, reported on the panel's findings. The Joint Management Committee received a presentation on these results. OCSD and SAW PA are trying to schedule a meeting with the OC flood control district and the Corps of Engineers on the options. Before any work can begin on any of the additional alternatives, the proposed projects Minutes of the Steering Committee y Page 3 April 24, 2002 will have to go through the CEOA process, which could add two years to the project and cost an additional$1 million. If the original Alternative D is chosen, construction can begin as soon as all issues are resolved. Implementing Altemative D would eliminate the need to upgrade the existing pipeline located within SAVI Ranch, resulting in lower overall costs. Mr.Anderson reported that SAW PA has indicated an interest in purchasing the line upstream of SAVI Ranch and its Board has directed staff to negotiate an agreement. SAW PA will be creating a list of deal points for consideration by both boards. F. GW RS Progress Report There has been considerable discussion at the Joint Coordinating Committee meetings on the direction of this project. There is a need to to make sure all the major elements are understood and reach a consensus between the two boards. The agreement has not been finalized. Chair Eckenrode discussed the reasons that the project should go forward. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-E) A. MW D Grant to OCWD re Barrier Wells and Relationship to GW RS This item was moved to a future meeting. B. Determine 'Dark' month for Standing Committees The members recommended that the Standing Committees will not meeting in July. This will be discussed with the Board at tonight's meeting. C. Consider additional Special Board Meetings on May 15 and June 19,2002 In order for the directors to understand the results of the beach studies and the completion of the Strategic Plan, staff is recommending that two special meetings be held prior to the level of treatment decision scheduled for the June 26, 2002 meeting. Special briefings could be held if the directors who can not make the meeting request them. It was approved to recommend that the Board consider these additional meetings. D. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to the Standing Committees in May. There was no discussion. E. Review and consideration of Agenda Items for Board of Directors Meeting of April 24, 2002 There was no discussion- (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Staff was asked to consider a response to Congresswoman Sanchez's letter on 'Buy American' (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 ✓ April 24, 2002 (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 5 p.m. There will be a Special Board Meeting on Wednesday, May 15, beginning at 6 p.m. The next Regular Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:37 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Section 54956.9, to discuss two potential cases of litigation. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:55 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Submitted by'. V� JAffiappan ring Committee Secretary Q1 reWro "scww Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, May 1, 2002 — 5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on May 1, 2002, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services James M. Ferryman,Vice Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations &Maintenance Don Bankhead Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Debbie Cook Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Tony Kawashima David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Tod Ridgeway Nick Arhontes, Collection Facilities Manager Paul Walker Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Others: Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Randy Fuhrman Anna Piercy Jan Vandersloot (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman spoke to the Committee regarding future issues for the District, and Jan Vandersloot addressed the Committee about ocean discharge issues. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. r� Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 May 1, 2002 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, referred the Directors to a flyer distributed to them that evening regarding the District's open house on May 18. Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, requested the Directors provide input to the General Manager on where the upcoming meet-and-confer closed session items should be placed on the agenda over the next few months. These items are anticipated to take an hour or longer to be presented and discussed. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS It was requested that Item 6(d) be pulled for discussion. a. The minutes of the April 3, 2002 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting was approved as drafted and ordered filed. b. OMTS02-29 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report,which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department c. OMTS02-30 Receive and file Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance, financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specked as 6(a)through (c)under Consent Calendar. d. OMTS02-31 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 6 to Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of District's Residual Solids with Synagro West, Inc. (formerly known as Pima Gro Systems, Inc.), providing for an extension of the contract for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005,with two additional one-year extensions, at the current all-weather cost of$39.50 per wet ton of biosolids managed for an annual amount not to exceed $2.054,000. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, corrected some of the figures contained within the report. The annual Biosolids Management budget is approximately$5,959,030;the contract term with Synagro expires on June 30, 2002,and the current cost with Yakima is$1,320,930. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended action. (7) ACTION ITEMS Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 May 1, 2002 (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS02-32 Ocean Discharge Issues Update Bob Ghirelli reported that the Coastal Commission rejected the city of San Diego's consistency determination for compliance with the Coastal Act. On April 19P the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board overturned their staffs recommendation to approve the city of Goleta's waiver on a 5t2 vote, and directed staff to bring back findings to their board to support denial of the waiver. A tour of the microfifration facility, led by Bob Dolan, Director of Operations & Maintenance, will be held on May 170 at Plant 2 for the Orange County Congressional Delegation. Directors discussed possibly holding the June 5th meeting at Plant 2, and touring the microfiltration facility. b. OMTS02-33 Impact of Regional Board's New Wastewater Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewers Nick Arhontes gave an update regarding the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's newly adopted Waste Discharge Requirements that will require the District and each member city and sewering agency to develop a comprehensive Sewer System Management Plan. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology reported staff was finalizing terms and conditions for a contract to upgrade the District's financial system. The report will be presented for approval in June. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Director of Operations and Maintenance reported that environmental documents would be mailed to the appropriate agencies soon with regard to designating chlorination and dechlorination as the preferred method for disinfection of the effluent. In the meantime staff is continuing researching other alternatives for disinfection to include peracetic acid and use of bleach at the front of the primary clarifiers. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services reported he would be attending a meeting of the Santa Ana River Watershed Group, which is comprised of agencies in the watershed, state agencies and federal agencies. They will be discussing ways the agencies can work together, share resources, and bring influence on some of the issues that the agencies are currently dealing with on both state and federal levels. d1 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance , and Technical Services Committee Page 4 May 1, 2002 (12) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager had no report. (13) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not in attendance. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for June 5, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Submitted by: L� to Penny M. K e Operations, Maintenan and Technical Services Committee Secretary Wwp.dta genda\OMTS\2002\2002 OMTS Minutes\050102 minutesAm w The annual Biosolids Management budget is approximately$5,959,030. This budget is managed as a pool and funds are distributed to the haulers from the pool. The District's contractors and costs are shown in the Table below. Contractor Cost Application Contract Biosolids Current (IlMfetTon) Sites) Tenn Managed Cost/Year(II) Est.TonsNear Synagro 39.50 Fort Mojave, 6/3012002 39,000 1,540,500 San Diego Co., Arizona Tule Ranch 25.60(Kings) Kern County, 6/30/2004 117,000 3,097,600' 27.35(Kern) Kings County Yakima 33.87 Kern County, 1/10/2012 39.000 1,320,930 Arizona(proposed) CA Soil 32.70 Riverside County, I 3111/2007 1 0 0 Products Imperial County (Under Construction Blend of 58,500 tons of bioWids managed in Kings County and 58,500 tons being managed in Kern County ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A Leven G:My.NabamWN�O b%'M1 R�N��2BaY FO as xe�on.esa2umn l>tq.syrememc flmsN:411=2 Page 3 i r DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Steve Anderson, Chair Bob Ooten, Director of O&M Russell Patterson,Vice Chair Use Tomko, Director of Human Resources Laurann Cook John Linder, Construction Manager Alice Jempsa Jim Herberg, Interim Engineering Manager Jerry Sigler Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Beth Krom Larry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair Andrei loan, Project Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Doug Korthof Randy Fuhmran Larry Porter Sims Vajdani (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM It was not necessary to appoint a Chair pro tem. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Doug Korthoff spoke against the 301(h) waiver. Larry Porter spoke about everyone doing a better job of protecting our valuable beaches. Randy Fuhnnan spoke about long-tens planning and the issues that will be impacting the District in 10 to 20 years. He asked that the directors take care of the present and look to the future. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Steve Anderson did not make a report. 1 a PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 May 1,2002 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present to make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin and Director of Human Resources Lisa Tomko asked the directors for their opinions on when in the board meetings to hold future closed session during the next couple of months. Labor negotiations are underway and longer than usual sessions are anticipated. Several options were identified and they will be discussed with the General Manager before a decision is made. Director Krom suggested that the start time of all of the regular Board Meetings be moved up and asked that a poll of the directors be taken. All of the options should be identified and the directors should check all that would work for them. Mr. Ludwin reported that a white paper is being prepared by staff on planning for an additional ouffall. It will identity all of the issues that would have to be addressed during permitting, planning, design and construction. The report will be presented to the PDC Committee and the Board. An update on the SARI relocation project was provided. Staffs from both agencies have agreed to move forward with evaluating six aftematives. Recommendations are scheduled to be presented to the Joint Management Committee in July. The outstanding invoices have not been resolved. A meeting is being scheduled with the Orange County Flood Control District. The Onshore Investigation report has been finalized. One of the projects noted, the Huntington Beach Purchase line, is already in the process of being addressed. (7) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER The Communications Manager was not present to make a report. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present to make a report. (9) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-g) a. RECEIVE. FILE, AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the April 4, 2002 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 May 1, 2002 b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached are the Monthly and Quarterly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent(5%). This is an information only item. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There is one change order this month for PDC Committee approval. C. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORTS Attached are the PSA and Addenda Report. This is an information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There were no PSAs and one Addendum approved by the General Manager from February 21 through March 21,2002. d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only Rem. f. PDCO2-29 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Chemical Facility Modifications,Job No. P1-46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No.J-53, with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$4,784 and a time extension of 28 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,676,925;and (2)Accept Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1.46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No.J-53,as complete,authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. g. PDCO2-30 Ratify Change Order No. 2 to HVAC Equipment Replacement at Plant Nos. i and 2,Job No.J-80, with Adams/Mallory Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$57,776, increasing the contract amount to$976,217. This Change Order is for PDC approval per delegated authority by Board Resolution No. 99-23. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 9(a)through (g) under Consent Calendar. PDC Committee Minutes , Page 4 May 2, 2002 (10) ACTION ITEM (Item a) a. PDCO2-31 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No.2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch Corporation for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, providing for additional design engineering services in the amount of$229,600, for a total amount not to exceed $3,711,523. Jim Herberg discussed the project and the reasons for the addendum. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch Corporation for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No.J-77, providing for additional design engineering services in the amount of$229,600, for a total amount not to exceed$3,711,523. (11) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Director Alice Jempsa pointed out an article in the City magazine on storm water issues. A copy of this article will be included in the next Board letter. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 6, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:47 p.m. PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 May 2, 2002 Submitted by: n Tappan P C Committee Secretary O:Wy.OlaMpmEe�NnWS UPM Ml..l PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.af Dir. 05/02/02 os/vJo2 IFan Number Ism Number AGENDA REPORT P000mb 1un Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: John Falkenstein, Project Manager SUBJECT: CHEMICAL FACILITY MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO. P1-46-2, AND CHEMICAL FLOW PACING FOR PRIMARY INFLUENT, JOB NO. J-53 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2, and Chemical Flaw Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, with SS Mechanical Corporation, authorizing an addition of$4,784 and a time extension of 28 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,676,925: and (2)Accept Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2, and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • This project permanently replaces the chlorine odor control and plant water disinfection at Plant No. 1 with hydrogen peroxide and bleach facilities and replaces four existing ferric chloride pumps, which have reached the end of their useful life. • The plans and specifications were prepared by Black and Veatch, and the contract was awarded to SS Mechanical Corporation on April 28, 1999. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date June 22, 1999 Original Contract Completion Date June 22, 2000 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 7 Current Contract Completion Date February 1, 2002 Actual Completion Date February 28, 2002 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damage Assessment 0 Change Order No. 7 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Panel labels $1,049 14 Design Change 2 Bleach station programming 588 0 Design Change 3 Bleach pump station bleed valves 580 14 Design Change 4 Modify East-West RAS bleach 2,567 0 Design Change connections Total — Change Order No. 7 $4,784 28 Job Completion The contract is now 100% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $2,229,251.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 442,890.00 This Change $ 4,784.00 Change Orders to Date $ 447,675.00 Percentage Increase to Date 20.08% Final Contract Price $2,676,925.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 5F, CIP Reclamation Plant No. 1) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt from CEQA requirements ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order G Age aRepoM1 201114 AWft RepMYOWNT 14(c)P1J 2.E BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Chemical Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1 JOB NOS. P1-46-2 AND J-53 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%( Design $ 622,900 $ 479,000 $ 479,000 $ 479,000 $ 479,000 $ 479,000 t00% Project Development $ 163.400 $ 6,000 $ 6.000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 100% Studies/Permitting $ 3,000 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3.000 $ 3,000 100% Construction Contract 1 $ 2.567.200 $ 2.802,000 $ 2,802.000 $ 2,672.141 $ 4.784 $ 2.676,925 $ 2.655.579 99% Construction Administration $ 507,200 $ 642.000 $ 642,000 $ 642,000 $ 642,000 $ 642,000 100% Construction Inspection $ 46,200 $ 574.000 $ 574,000 $ 574.000 $ 574.000 $ 574,000 100% Contingency $ 328,400 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 PROJECT TOTAL $ 4,235,300 $ 4,536,000 $ 4,536,000 $ 41376,141 $ 4,784 $ 4,380,925 $ 4,359,579 99% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 4.235.300 $ 4,536,000 $ - $ 4,536,000 $ 4.376,141 $ 4,784 $ 4,380,925 $ 4,359,679 1 99% g;Mp.E Wrq,Yobsardcomraos�pl-46.2 chany.om.rsWudgettblxaR5 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT CHEMICAL FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND CHEMICAL FLOW PACING FOR PRIMARY INFLUENT JOB NOS. PI-46-2 AND J-53 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS( (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/22/00 $ 2,229,251.00 $ 2,229,251.00 0.00% 365 - 365 CO NO. 1' 6/30/00 $ 89.742.00 $ 2,318,993.00 4.03% 124 489 CO NO. 2" 8/3/00 $ 84,166.00 $ 2,403,159.00 7.80% 0 489 CO NO. 3 11/15/00 $ 125,074.00 $ 2,528,233.00 13.41% 105 594 CO NO. 4" 2/1/01 $ 75,614.00 $ 2,603,847.00 16.80% 0 594 CO NO. 5 6/27101 $ 25.373.00 $ 2,629,220.00 17.94% 5 599 CO NO.6 12/19/01 $ 42.921.00 $ 2,672,141.00 19.87% 355 954 CO NO. 7 Pending $ 4,784.00 $ 2,676,925.00 20.08% 28 982 *Approved by GM per delegated authmlty by Board Readutim W23 "Approved by PDC per delegated aulbadty by Board Resdullan 9943 g:WryMe`mVWbumM w raats\p-1 46-2tbm9eordera�co&s s.repM Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Seven (7) Date: May 22, 2002 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications. Job No. P1-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent Job No. J-53 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Bedual) 4,784.0 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. Pt-46-2 ITEM 1 — PANEL LABELS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install engraved panel labels and valve tags at the three new hydrogen peroxide and bleach stations at Plant No. 1. The work included furnishing and installing 53 panel labels and 5-valve wire tags and was requested by the District Process Control Integration and Operations Department staff to comply with the new J-42 standard. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 49) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,049.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days ITEM 2—BLEACH STATION PROGRAMMING The Contractor was directed to furnish labor to perform an additional 5 hours of software programming to the programmable logic controller(PLC)for the Bleach Station at Plant No. 1 as follows: 1. Modify plant water flowmeter in/out service 2. Manual flow rate setpoint This additional programming was requested by District Process Control Integration and Operations Department staff as a result of the field testing. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 50) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $588.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Seven (7) Date: May 22, 2002 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications. Job No. P1 46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53 ITEM 3— BLEACH STATION PUMP BLEED VALVES The Contractor was directed to furnish labor and materials associated with the installation of five new bleed valves on the bleach pumps at the new bleach station at Plant No. 1. The bleed valves were requested by the District Operations Department staff to facilitate priming of the bleach pumps. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 51) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $680.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4—MODIFY EAST-WEST RAS CONNECTIONS The Contractor is directed to furnish labor materials and modify the two bleach connections in the Return Activated Sludge (RAS) pump station at Plant No. 1. Modifications to the original connection design was requested by the District Operations Department to avoid excessive vibration from pump start-up. The work included strengthening the connections using 2" schedule 80 PVC pipe and fittings and adding check valves upstream of the connection location. This work was not included in the original contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 52) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,567.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $4,784.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 28 Calendar Days '( Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Seven (7) Date: May 22. 2002 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications, Job No. P1-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent, Job No. J-53 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 28 day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 22, 1999 Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 22, 2000 Time Extension this C.O.: 28 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 617 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 982 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 28, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: March 29, 2002 Original Contract Price $ 2,229,251.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 442,890.00 This Change (Add) (Deduet) $ 4,784.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,676,925.00 i Page of 4 ' 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: SS Mechanical Corporation C.O. No.: Seven (7) Date: May 22, 2002 Job: Chemical Facility Modifications Job No. P1-46-2 and Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent Job No. J-53 Board Authorization Date: May 22, 2002 ORANGE COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: SS MECHANICAL CORPORATION Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ad.or Dir. 0 5 /0 2 /02 05R2J02 AGENDA REPORT It Number ItemNumber Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Robyn A. Wilcox, Project Manager SUBJECT: EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX, JOB NO. J-77 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch Corporation for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No.J-77, providing for additional design engineering services in the amount of$229,600, for a total amount not to exceed $3,711,523. SUMMARY Background • The Effluent Pump Station Annex (EPSA)will replace the existing Foster Booster Pump Station with a new pumping facility that is capable of providing adequate backup capacity to the existing Ocean Outfall Booster Station (COBS) during excess flow events and routine maintenance. The EPSA structure will house 3-120 million gallons per day (mgd) pumps. Two of these pumps will provide a firm backup capacity of 240 mgd, which is half of the nominal capacity of the existing COBS facility. The third 120 mgd pump will serve as a backup for these two units. • The EPSA is being designed to accommodate the pumping of secondary treated water exclusively through the 78-inch outfall during excess flow events. The EPSA facility will also have the ability to provide backup for half of the OOBS facility during high flow occurrences and routine maintenance of the COBS facility and pump to either outfall. • Addendum No. 2 with Black &Veatch Corporation (B&V) consists of several additional work items: 1. Upgrade to Current Revision of Engineering Design Standards: This item covers the negotiated costs for updating to Revision D of the new Engineering Design Standards. The additional cost for this item is $68,000. 2. Underground Utility Identification and Verification: There are approximately 85 underground utility conflicts (to date)which have been identified inside of the limits of construction for this project. The District is in the process of compiling a comprehensive Utility Atlas from existing As-Builts and other historic data. To date, very little in-field verification has been completed to confine its accuracy. As this is one of the first projects of any significance that will occur since the development of the Utility Atlas, Staff has recognized the value of having the Consultant provide extra care in locating and protecting said utilities. District staff requested a proposal for the Consultant for potholing and other location techniques in an effort to protect and provide verification of utilities. The additional cost for this item is $37,000. Page 1 3. 42" Raw Sewage Pipeline Design: After careful consideration and extensive District staff input, the Consultant has determined that an inverted siphon will be necessary for ' implementation of this project. As this is outside of the current Scope of Work(SOW), I an additional $13,000 to perform design of this item is requested. 4. Additional I&C Requirements for the Standby Power Facility: Similar to Item 1 of this addendum, additional work is required of the Consultant to update the design to the current Engineering Standard Revision D for the Instrumentation and Control for the Standby Power Facility. The additional cost for this item is $39,000. 5. Demolition of Foster Pump Station: Demolition of the existing Foster Pump Station facility was not included in the original Scope of Work. In light of potential demands for land due to the potential secondary treatment expansion, and disinfection facilities, Staff recommends that a full demolition of this facility be included in this design. As removal of this facility would be best accomplished during the construction of the new structure, District staff recommends that the demolition be included. The additional cost for this item is $33,000. 6. 96" Butterfly Valve Replacement: The original SOW anticipated installation of new butterfly valves. However as design evolved, it was recommended that one of the existing valves be replaced in an existing valve structure. Design for replacement as opposed to new construction will require more effort by the Consultant. The additional cost for this extra design effort for this item will be $13,000. 7. Plant No. 2 North Entry Gate Modifications: Construction personnel will utilize the North Gate at Plant No. 2 for this project. With increased security awareness at the District in recent months, Staff requested an estimate to automate the operation of the existing manual gate at the North Entrance of Plant No. 2. The additional cost for this item is $7,000. 8. Additional Pump Testing with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (NHC): After witnessing the testing in Vancouver in December 2001, the subconsultant NHC found some irregularities with the proposed flow modfcations. These abnormalities caused the subconsultant to remodel a portion of these modifications to improve the overall pump station model performance. These changes were necessary to ensure that we have the best modeling available for this facility. The additional cost for this item is $9,600. PROJECT/CONTRACT THE ADDITIONAL COST SUMMARY Authorization of an additional $229,600 is being made under the"Consultant Professional Services Agreement(PSA)"budget as indicated in the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: FY 2g9o-01, Section 8, Page 95, Capital Improvement Program, Ocean Outfall Systems, Effluent Pumping station Annex, Job No. J-77) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Transfer of$25,000 from the contingency budget is being requested with no change to the overall project budget. Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As design of this project has progressed, the necessity for several out-of-scope items has evolved. Staff recommends the inclusion of these items in the overall design of this facility. Staff has negotiated all costs with Black&Veatch (B&V)after extensive review and discussion and has found them to be reasonable to perform the work. A table summarizing costs for individual items is given below: Item Additional Work Items Request Money per Number Work Item 1 Upgrade to Current I&C Standards—Main Facilities $ 68,000 2 Underground Utility Identification and Verification $ 37,000 3 42" Raw Sewage Inverted Siphon Design $ 13,000 4 Additional I&C Requirements for Standby Power Facility $ 39,000 5 Demolition of Foster Pump Station $ 33,000 6 96" Butterfly Valve Replacement $ 13.000 7 North Gate Entry Modification $ 7,000 8 Additional Pump Model Testing $ 9,600 9 Direct The additional costs/Expenses $ 10,000 Total Request for Additional Work Items $229,600 ALTERNATIVES No Altematives are proposed. CEQA FINDINGS The rehabilitation of Foster Pump Station (FPS)was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. The EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29,1999. A supplemental EIR has been initiated to update the Program EIR to reflect replacement of FPS rather the rehabilitation indicated in the Strategic Plan. ATTACHMENTS 1 Budget Information Table 2 PSA Status Report RW:jo:SaG:\wp.db\agendaSoard Agenda RewraA2002 Board Agenda Reperts*50 1W 14(d).J-RAOC Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX JOB NO. J-77 ORIGINAL CURRENT f PROPOSED FUN DS NDS THIS PROPOSED - ESTIMATED ESTIMATED: • PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT DUUOET:}"� i P Ep 0y8E0G A�.NOftQED AUTHbr-¢ATION� TOTAL EXPENDITURE GEN6 D ,a gGOGET ' -- DUOGEt`:rp "(trTCR �' "tom-I °I�� T�DAT� RE II�S'[.;. � AUTFIOl2PATlON T013'A'fE ODATE(%)I Project Development $ 100,000 $ 2,000 $ 2.000 $ 1,756 $ 1,756 $ 1,756 100% StudleslPermlHin $ 24,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 15.690 $ 15.690 $ 15,690 100% Consultant PSA $ 2,500,000 $ 3,775,000 $ 25,000 $ 3,800.000 $ 3,481,923 $ 229,600 $ 3,711,523 $ 1,458,395 39% Design Staff $ 1,901,000 $ 720,000 11 720,000 $ 720.000 $ 720,000 $ 139,788 19% Construction Contract $ 19,078,000 $ 35.020,000 $ 35.020,000 $ $ 4,864 Construction Administration $ 1,698,000 $ 1,509,000 $ 1,509,000 $ Construction Inspection $ 369,000 $ 1,154,000 $ 1,154,000 $ Contingency $ 2,676,000 $ 5,725,000 $ 25,000 $ 5,700,000 `. $ PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 28,346,000 1$ 47.925,000 1 $ 47,925,000 1, 1 $ 4,219,369 $ 229.600 $ 4,448.969 1 $ 1.620,493 36% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 28,346,000 1$ 47,925,000 1$ (25,000) $ 47,925.000 11 $ 4.219,369 1 $ 229,600 $ 4,448.969 $ 1,620,493 36% $30.980 authorized for Carollo Engineers-Preliminary design study under J-59 }77 add2 budget tableAs Professional Services Agreement Status Report Effluent Pump Station Annex Job No. J-77 Total Project Budget: $47,925,000 Consultant: Black& Veatch Engineers Start Date of Project: May 25, 2000 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 5/25100 Original Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77 $2,208,810 $2,208,810 PSA 8/27/01 Addendum Provide Additional Preliminary and Final Design $1,273,113 $3,481,923 #1 Work, & Addition of Emergency Backup Power and Structure Pending Addendum Provide Additional Scope Items to include I&C $229,600 $3,711,523 #2 Upgrade, Utility Location, Demolition of FPS, 42" Siphon, 96" BFV Replacement, and North Entry Gate Modification J-77 PSA Status Rpt a&V CATEMPV-77 PSA Status Remd BV.dx 04/10102 Revised 05/14/98 The FAHR minutes of the meeting held May 8, 2002 were not available for this mailing . These minutes will be distributed at the May 22, 2002 Board of Directors meeting . Once the minutes are finalized, they will also be available on the District's website (www.ocsd.com). 1 Meetlng Dale To Bd.of Fir. FAHR COMMITTEE s)Dg)Dz S/zyoz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR02-37 is(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2002 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 2002. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional extemal money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of Califomia Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report, the District is holding a United Airlines (UAL)Asset Backed Security that carried an acceptable credit rating at the time of purchase. Since that time,the rating from Moody's has fallen twice, first from A3 to BA1, and then to BA3. Also, the security rating from Standard & Poor's fell once from A-to BBB. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if this security was sold. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of"credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. Q9 Ae Wnge\ dFgenga"ee VWI 8o 1Ngenna kepMW53N[em 151c),Trasurer ReO d= Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ' e ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts ApM 30,2002 Yield(%) State of Calif.LAIF $ 20.100,964 2.85 Union Bank Checking Account 439,285 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 545,000 1.09 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 43,214,055 4.40 PIMCO-Long-tens Portfolio 356,214.232 4.60 Debt Service Reserves w/rmstees 35,205,283 4.09 Petty Cash 5.000 N/A TOTAL3.N19 ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:Ic GA",ftbgenda�d ApenEe Rey Q002 BwN AgenEa ReoftWWMem t',.le)Tmasuw Rep .= Page 2 ReportIMonthly Treasurer's District Fund Balances 11 111 111 $450,000,000 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII iiiiiiiiTi uiuuw IIIIIIIIII 40 III IIJ$35 \\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\ \\\\ \\\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i♦�.• i..♦♦ i...♦ !.•.•.�.Q i•..♦ �i�i��i�i $25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �i�i�i��i �i�i��i ��i�i�i�i �•�•�•�•�� .�.�.i.� �� 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 •�i�i�i�i� i�i�i�� i�i�i�i�i� ii�i�i�i�i .........� �i�i�i��i i•.•♦ i•..♦ i••.. •..•� i•.•. ..•.•� 11111 111 ♦�..• ♦...� ♦.•.• i.•.♦ •..•� i..•♦ 01 Dec, 01 Jan, 02 Feb, 02 Mar, 02 Apr, 1 0 Debt Service Reserves IOLAIF n Bank Accts 0 Petty Cash 0D GO Bond Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund April 2002 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance April 1, 2002 $18,799,348 $18,799,348 $18,799,348 2.85 2.85 Deposits: 04/19/02 14,200,000 14,200,000 14,200,000 2.85 2.85 Quarterly Interest Distribution 201,616 201,616 201,616 2,85 2.85 Withdrawals: 04/03/002 (2,200,000) (2,200,000) (2,200,000) 2.85 2.85 04/10/02 (6,600,000) (6,600,000) (6,600,000) 2.85 2.85 04/17/02 (2,2W,000) (2,200,000) (2,200.000) 2.85 2.85 04124/02 (2,10D,000) (2,100,000) (2,700,000) 2.85 2.85 Balance April 30,2002 20,100,964 20,100,964 20,100,964 2.86 2.85 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 April 2002) Page I of 2 Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $43,719,576 • Melton $43,714,536 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $44,019,427 • Mellon $44,019,525 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.25 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $109 299 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Mooning within 90 days: 65% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit utility: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.25 0.14 3 Months: 0.59 0.42 12 Months: 3.63 2.86 Year-to-Date; 0.78 0.58 Commentary Interestrks at the short-end of the yield curve declined duringthe month(3-monlh T-Bills fell2 but.points to 1.76%),as did longer matuddes(30-year Tmuuries fe0 21 bolt puintto 5.59%). The Liquid ponfolio outperformed the benchmark by 11 basis point,during the month,and by 20 buis points Y.40414e. PBACO's emphmison hiRmryieldingsecuritiessuch u mmmemial papermdshon-term notes enhmudmwms. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 April 2002) Page 2 of 2 Compliance Issues: None. Split Rated Securities Still in Compliance: • $85,000 par of Ford Motor Credit note(345397RS4) 6.55%coupon, 9/10/2002 maturity,representing 0.2%of the portfolio holdings-this security was downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+; the issue now carries a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade(from A2) on 1/16/2002. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. c:i.nmVMmoiwaui�dy M�'L¢osroo:uwre: MONTHLY REPORT , ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING At REPORTING (for the month ended 30 April 2002) Page I of 2 Long-Tenn Operating Monles(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $360,960,993 • Mellon $360,849,271 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $354,621,940 • Mellon $354,616,356 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.02 Of Index: 2.44 15.1.3 I%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)oft%Change: $7291410 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Ropes: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 37% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio CreditQua]i : AA+ 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.9 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No' 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1.46 1.38 1 Month: 1.44 0.98 3 Months: 6.26 6.90 12 Months: Year-to-Date: 1.89 1.27 • Thmemonth yields declined during the morals(9aday T-Bills fell basis points to 1.76%)as did longer meturitios(5-yeas Tmasury Notes fell 43 basis points to 4AI./.). • The Long-Term potfolio outperformed the benchmmk by 8 basis points fm the month,and by 62 basis points for the ycariodatc. • Positioning the postpone with below-index duration by PIMCO was negative for performance as yields fell across all maturrttes. • Cu Eva post Elm ing was slightly ncgatim an performance,and abelow-index exposure to intemedimc maturities dcumed from returns as Intermediate yields fell the most. • M underweight W[maim to Treasuries was slightly negaam for performance at the sector performed wall during the month. • Holdings of mortgage-backed securities improved perfmma e,on a durationwdjusted buffs,as mortgages were the best performing sector for the month. • M underweight allocation to corporates was strongly positive for performance a this sector legged Treasurin. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 30 April 2002) Page 1 of 2 'Compliance Issues: $1,600,000 par of United Airlines Pass-Through 2001.1-C(909317BC2),6.83I%coupon,9/12008 maturity,representing 0.3%of the portfolio holdings-this security was purchased on 8/102001;it was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAI (on 9/182001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 9202001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BA I to BA3 on 1221200). The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. With respect to the UAL holding,PIMCO's recommendation for the issue has not changed. In their opinion,the spread,collateral,and issuer liquidity all point to continuing to hold the security. The following points provide basis for their recommendation: •foremost,PIMCO doesn't believe that UAL is going bankrupt. Almost all major US airlines have sufficient liquidity and unencumbered assets to survive today's bleak industry conditions. UAL is the second largest carrier in the world,and they believe that the company(and the industry)will survive. •secondly,the collateral is good(very young planes,medium to high aircraft diversification,loan-to-value ratio is 60-75%,etc.). •PIMCO believes liquidation values,even under the most onerous assumptions,are much higher than reflected in current market prices. Current pricing levels overstate the risks. •If the security was sold at the lowest price currently available(74.I5 per IDC),the portfolio would realize a loss of$413,680(approximately I 1 basis points given the total portfolio value). However,as detailed above,PIMCO believes the fair market value of the issue is much higher than currently reflected in the market. This is a conservative loss estimate. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. If anything changes that would prompt them to revise their recommendation on the inclusion of the security within the portfolio,they will let us know to take appropriate action. Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: •$6,000,000 par of Daimler Chrysler securities(I7120QES and 233835AM9),with$4,500,000 maturing on December 2002 and the remaining$1.5 million maturing on August 2002,represents I.7%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/3 MOO I by S&P from A-to BBB+; the securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$9,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities(345397GV9,345397RV7,345397S13,345397SR5),maturing at various dates in 2003,2004,and 2005, represents 2.6%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade(from A2)on 1/162002. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$11,750,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(370425QV5,37042 WE80,37042WZK0),maturing in 2003,represents 3.3°%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the securities continue to carry a Moody's rating ofA2. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. G.lop.dral11n11101whlrelTreasury MgMIL-T0800-01-04.RPT.doe Q Mellon Trost-Sample Report _ _ PAGE. I D US NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY BASE OCSF07511102 30-APR-2002 PRELIMINARY LIQUID OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 6,315,085.50 6,315,085.50 14.45% 0.00 U.S.GOVERNMENTS-LESS THN IYR 549,582.04 549,835.94 1.26% 253.90 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 4,935,420.22 4,935,420.22 11.29% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 3,950,859.28 3,950,859.29 9.04% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 997,113.06 997,113.06 2.29% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,931,971.33 1,931,871.33 4.42% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 18,679,93IA3 18,690,185.33 42.73% 253.90 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 18,679931.43 18,68(095.33 42.73% 253.90 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 9,677,909.25 9,600,264.00 21.96% -77,645.25 U.S.AGENCIES 1,996,732.09 1,879,573.60 4.30% -7,159.49 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 49,953.13 49,992.00 0.11% 38.87 BANKING&FINANCE 7,219,488.74 7,088,508.52 16.22% ,130,980.22 INDUSTRIAL 3,272,067.00 3,218,535.30 7.36% -53,531.70 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 1,959,734.40 1,936,315.90 4.43% -23,419.60 UTILITY-GAS 773,227.50 760,680.00 1.74% .12,547.50 TOTAL UNITED STATES 24,839,112.11 24,533,869.22 56.12% -305,242.89 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 24,839,II2.11 24,533,869.22 56.12% -3DU4249 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 500,491.07 500,481.07 1.14% 0.00 TOTAL 500,481.07 500,481.07 1.14% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 500,481.07 500,481.07 1.14% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 44,019,524.61 43,714,535.6E 100.00% -304,988.99 07-Mar-2002 13:43:39 &ecaliw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 1 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-APR-2002 PRELIMINARY LONG TERMOPER-P1MC0 %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 48,101.25 48,101.25 0.01% 0.00 PAYABLES -42,319,625.00 42,319,625.00 -11.73% 0.00 TOTAL -42,271,523.75 42,271,523.75 -11.71% 0.00 UNITED STATES MUTUAL FUNDS 77,979,848.41 77,979,848.41 21.61% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 77,979,948.41 77,979,848.41 21.61% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 35,709,324.66 35,708,324.66 9.90% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 84,909,02&51 84,729,826.61 23.48% -179,199.90 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,171,113.29 33,296,895.11 9.23% 4,125,781.82 U.S.AGENCIES 43,541,706.46 44,604,866.68 12.36% 1,063,160.22 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 31,774,159.68 32,128,381.27 8.90% 354,221.59 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 7,639,968.16 7,779,055.49 2.16% 139,097.33 FHLMC POOLS 2,462,249.11 2,456,149.86 0.68% -6,099.25 FHLMC MULTICLASS 3,866,829.28 3,928,646.33 1.09% 61,817.05 FNMA POOLS 15,724,375.00 15,965,625.00 4.42% 241,250.00 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 5,390,083.85 5,274,097.04 1.46% -115,986.81 ABS:CAR LOAN 507,801.08 503,165.57 0.14% 4,635.51 BANKING&FINANCE 39,180,009.50 39,509,636.00 10.95% 329,626.50 INDUSTRIAL 27,986,405.00 27,955,802.00 7.75% -30,603.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 14,622,010.00 14,858,685.00 4.12% 236,675.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,515,075.00 2.08% 17,820.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 314,272,991.92 320,505,906.96 88.82% 6,232,915.04 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 314,272,991.92 320,505,906.96 88.82% 6,232,915.04 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 4,635,039.37 4,635,039.37 1.28% 0.00 07-Map2002 13:44.24 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE 2 BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 30-APR-2002 PRELIMINARY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS TOTAL 4,635,039.37 4,635,039.37 1.28% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,635,03937 4,635,0.3937 1.28% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 354,616,355.95 360,849,270.99 HIM% 6,232,915.04 07-Maj4002 13:44:24 Ert dw WoCM wh YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCBF07511102 2002/04/30 RUN DATE 05/06/02 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME K 08.54.05 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION ROOK YIELD B-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASE 6 CABS EQUIVALENTS 350,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING MGM .000 1.800 P-1 100.000 349,746.10 1.97 86387TBR7 VAR AT 06/20/2002 DD 12/20/01 A-1+ 350,000.00 .81 200,000.00 STUDENT LN SAW MAN SHORT TAX .000 1.821 P-1 99.918 199,935.94 1.06 86307=3 VAR AT 07/10/2002 DD O1/17/02 A-1+ 199,835.94 .46 1,931,071.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MUST .000 1.025 AAA l00.000 1,931,671.33 10.34 996065247 AAA 1,931,071.33 4.47 1,500,000.00 SHAFT TOODS INC DISC 1.352 .000 99.903 1,498,541.67 0.02 5000MI904 05/16/2002 1,498,541.61 3.47 1,SDO,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 1.053 .000 99.035 1,497,520.03 8.01 025818EV9 05/29/2002 1,497,520.83 3.43 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIM ASSM DISCOUNT 1.795 .000 P-1 99.746 2,094,674.75 11.21 313589XDO MT 05/23/2002 A-1+ 2,094,674.75 4.85 2,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 1.204 .000 P-1 99.900 997,700.00 5.34 63743DFA4 06/10/2002 997,700.00 2.31 2,033,000.00 FED MGM LM MG CORP DISC HIS 1.804 .000 P-1 99.055 2,029,019.15 10.65 313390ES2 HAT 05/21/2002 A-1+ 2,029,019.15 4.69 1,700,000.00 MERCK 6 INC DISC 1.804 .000 99.755 1,695,835.00 9.07 58933SE87 OS/08/2002 1,695,835.00 3.92 2,000,000.00 PSDNAAL HOKE LN SIG COMP DISC 1.005 .000 P-1 99.730 1,994,600.00 10.67 313390=1 MAT 05/14/2002 A-1+ 1,994,400.00 4.62 620,000.00 COCA COLA CO DISC 1.800 .000 P-1 99.600 625,485.00 3.34 191212802 05/24/2002 625,488.00 1.45 500,DOD.00 FEDERAL SOME LN HK CURB DISC 1.024 .000 P-1 99.783 498,913.06 2.67 31338SNF9 MAT 05/01/2002 A-1+ 490,913.06 1.15 233,000.00 FEDERAL SEE LN KID CORE DISC 1.069 .000 P-1 99.597 232,061.01 1.24 313390YU8 MAT 06/20/2002 A-1+ 232,061.01 .54 685,000.00 FED H09E LN MEG CORP DISC GTE 1.962 .000 P-1 99.308 690,740.06 3.64 323397280 MAT 07/08/2002 A-1+ 600,740.09 1.50 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE f 2 OCSFOI511102 2002/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/06/02 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME i 00.54.05 PAR VALUE YEN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD 9-P PRICE BARNEY VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,872,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL SYS ASSN DISCOUNT 2.073 .000 P-1 99.155 1,056,104.53 9.93 313589BB5 MAT 08/14/2002 A-1+ 1,856,194.53 4.30 $00,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN UE CONS DISC M 2.098 .ODO P-1 99.640 498,200.00 2.66 313385NM2 NAT 05/16/2002 A-1+ 498,200.00 1.15 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CARE 6 CABS EQUIVALENTS 1.412 .376 18,679,931.43 100.00 18,6BO,185.33 43.24 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 125,D00.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTO ASSN MTN .000 2.039 AAA 100.046 124,960.94 .50 3136FOYN6 VAR RT 02/21/2003 DD 00/21/01 AAA 125,057.50 .29 400,000.00 MENAE BROS NTH #TR 00343 .000 2.777 A2 100.125 400,988.00 1.63 52513POG9 VAR AT 07/15/2002 DD 07/12/99 A 400,500.00 .93 50,000.00 STUDENT LR MARKETING ASSN 9/T .000 1.820 AAA 95.984 49,953.13 .20 86387T®S VAR RT 08/15/2002 DD 02/21/02 AAA 49,992.00 .12 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL SAIL SYS ASSN NTN 1.640 6.533 AAA 100.266 3,458,370.00 13.89 31364CN09 6.590% 05/21/2002 DD OS/21/93 AAA 3,409,044.00 7.09 200,ODD.00 FEDERAL ROTS IN MTG CORP DEES 1.908 5.492 AAA 100.141 201,814.00 .82 3134"BR8 5.500E 05/15/2002 DD 05/24/99 AAA 200,282.00 .46 30,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN USE COMB BD 1.949 5.649 AAA 100.203 30,409.80 .12 3133MOWS 5.660% 05/21/2002 DD 05/22/99 ARE 30,060.90 .03 50,000.00 FEDERAL ROM IN BR CONS BUD 1.963 5.804 AAA 100.453 50,934.50 .20 3133MBXL3 5.830% 06/14/2002 DD 06/14/99 AAA 50,226.50 .12 200,000.00 FED PASS CA HE CONS SYS SYS 2.110 4.764 AAA 101.172 203,994.00 .02 31331RD44 4.820E 10/07/2002 DD 10/07/98 AAA 202,344.00 .43 630,ODO.00 FEDERAL BOLOS IS BR CONS BDS 2.230 5.024 AAA 102.016 622,102.40 2.53 3133MCUE3 5.125% 01/13/2003 DD 01/12/01 AAA 622,297.60 1.44 195,000.00 FEDERAL DOES LN BR CORE BUS 2.270 5.529 AAA 102.375 195,594.20 .81 3133WA56 5.660% 01/13/2003 DD 01/13/98 AAA 199,631.25 .46 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE [ 3 OCSFO7511102 2002/04/3D RUN DATE [ 05/06/02 DISTRICT[ LIQUID OPERATIHG RUN TINE [ 00.54.05 PAR VALUR YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MONEY WTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE NARNBT VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 100,000.OD FEDERAL ROM LN M CONE ME 2.296 5.483 AAA 102.325 102,392.00 .41 3133N23D3 5.610% 01/23/2003 DO 01/23/98 AAA 102,325.00 .24 900r000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PER 1ST A REP 2.329 7.323 A2 100.709 927,982.00 3.69 927804CD4 0.305% 07/01/2002 DO 07/14/92 A 906,381.00 2.10 6,000,000.00 U 3 TREASURY NOTES 2.522 6.057 AAA 103.187 6,219,531.25 25.23 912827370 06.2501 02/15/2003 DO 02/15/93 AAA 6,191,220.00 14.33 25,000.00 FEDERAL RATE, HTG MEN EVE 2.529 6.671 AAA 100.437 25,647.25 .10 31364CO92 6.700% 06/04/2002 DD 06/04/97 AM 25,109.25 .06 90,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG MEN EYE 2.562 2.270 AM 100.000 79,800.00 .32 3136F1AWO 2.27D% 12/27/2002 DD 12/27/01 AAA 80,000.00 .19 250,000.00 DONALDSON LUPRIN 4TR 00039E 2.614 6.872 M3 102.875 257,995.00 1.04 25066CeM6 7.070% 12/13/2002 DO 12/13/99 M- 257,187.50 .60 193,000.00 PITNEY BONES CH. CORP HT 2.723 8.448 AA3 104.164 203,794.49 .81 724477MO 0.800% 02/13/2003 DO 02/12/91 AA 201,036.52 .40 20,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BE CONS BD8 2.726 5.445 AAA 100.094 20,302.40 .OB 3133EBR02 5.450% 05/10/2002 DO 05/10/99 AM 20,018.80 .05 555,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP HT 2.765 6.634 A2 100.389 568,475.40 2.27 441812M9 6.000% 06/15/2002 DO 06/08/95 A 557,158.95 1.29 150,000.00 MERILL LYNCH 3.107 6.720 AA3 102.191 155,247.00 .62 5901SOEP9 6.815% 03/01/2003 M- 153,286.50 .35 545,000.00 HERRILL LYNCH&CO KIN 4TR 00012 3.141 7.199 M3 101.023 559,122.50 2.24 59018YAH3 7.250% 07/26/2002 DO 07/26/00 M- 550,575.35 1.27 200,000.00 DEAN HITTER DISCOVER 6 CO 3.144 6.709 M3 102.480 206,866.00 .83 24240VACS 6.825% 03/01/2003 M- 204,960.00 .40 200r 000.0O ML HART STORES INC NT 3.159 6.821 AA2 100.794 206,194.00 .82 9311429G7 6.875% 08/01/2002 DO 08/01/00 M 201,500.00 .47 400,000.00 NATURAL RURAL MILE COOP FIN 3.240 7.153 Al 103.109 413,064.00 1.60 630432CE9 0.375% 02/10/2003 DO 02/10/00 A+ 412,436.00 .95 325,000.00 ANBRICAN GEN FIN KIN 4TR 00324 3.278 6.513 Al 100.562 333,050.25 1.33 02635PPM 6.550% 06/24/2002 DD 06/24/99 A+ 326,826.50 .76 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGB 1 4 MSM7511102 2002/04/30 RON DATE , OS/06/02 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RON TIM t 08.54.05 PAN VMEE YTS AT COME" MOODY MARKET TOTM COST/ 9 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ________-_ $75,000.00 PBILIP NORRIS COS NT 3.342 7.042 A2 101.194 592,927.30 2.37 710154WR 1.1258 08/15/2002 DO 08/15/92 A- 581,808.00 1.35 1.100r000.00 FIRST UN COUP BOB HT 3.001 8.055 A2 100.070 1,139,714.00 4.52 33135SM7 9.1251 06/24/2002 DO 06/24/92 A- 1,109,530.00 2.57 605,000.00 CIT GROUP RIDGE INC 3.006 6.351 A2 200.376 619,520.00 2.47 12SS69DPS 6.375% 08/01/2002 DO 07/28/97 A- 607,274.60 1.41 200,000.00 PBDSRAL NAIL STU ADDS NTN 3.809 6.194 AAA 101.062 204,608.00 .82 33364C3S6 6.240% 07/29/2002 DO 07/29/97 AAA 202,124.00 .47 60D,000.00 BEM STEAMS COS SIR / TRO040S 3.053 5.704 A2 100.806 610,968.00 2.46 073929SN4 5.750% 08/12/2002 DD 02/12/01 A 604,636.00 1.40 165,000.00 HORGAN STANLEY DEAN NITTER 4.042 6.313 M3 100.922 168,652.05 .60 617446COO 6.375% 06/01/2002 DO 07/20/97 M- 166,521.30 .39 1,020,000.00 NIAGARA HOMES PNR CORE ST 4.111 5.818 SAKI 100.974 1,031,753.40 4.19 653522CQ3 5.875% 09/01/2002 DO 09/01/94 A+ 1,029,934.90 2.38 20,000.00 FEDERAL NONE IN BE CONS BOB 4.273 5.891 AM 100.404 20,272.60 .08 3133S9386 5.920% 06/14/2002 DO 06/14/99 AAA 20,096.80 .D5 1,180,000.00 SELLS FMGO 6 CO SUS NT 4.265 9.350 M3 100.202 1,224,286.70 4.81 94974DBV5 0.375% 05/15/2002 DO 05/26/92 A 1,182,383.60 2.74 85,000.00 FORD SIR CR CO SIR 4.319 6.492 A3 100.892 86,759.50 .34 345391R84 6.550% 09/10/2002 DO 09/10/97 BBB+ 85,758.20 .20 60,000.00 CEASE SANRATTAN CORE USE SUB 4.389 8.625 Al 100.000 61,645.90 .24 16163AB81 8.625% 05/01/2002 DO 05/01/92 A+ 50,000.00 .14 750,000.00 PUBLIC SVC ELEC GAS ITR 00008 4.398 7.099 A3 101.424 113,22].50 3.10 14456QAN9 7.900% 09/06/2002 DD 09/D6/00 A- 760,600.00 1.76 SIt000.00 MRIDIM BANCORP INC SHE DEB 4.410 7.184 A2 101.175 52,596.30 .21 58958OAB5 7.895% 07/15/2002 DD 01/IS/92 A- 51,599.25 .12 155,000.00 BANK On CORP NY 4.527 6.335 M3 101.031 157,743.75 .63 06423MC9 6.400% 00/01/2002 DD 07/22/99 A 156,599.05 .36 500,000.00 GTE CORD NTR TR 00001 4.609 6.409 A2 101.101 508,090.00 2.06 36232NAA4 6.5608 08/14/2002 DD 08/14/97 A 505,505.00 1.17 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PANE f 5 MBF07SI1102 2002/04/30 RUN DATE f 05/06/02 DISTRICTf LIQUID OPEMTIM RUN TINE f 08.54.05 PER VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NOODY NAMBT TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID MCURITY DESCRIPTION BODE YIELD S-P PRICE NARMT VALUE 9 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ____-_---- 1,015,000.00 NESTINDROUB6 EISC CORE NT 4.673 8.322 A3 100.642 1,051,302.70 4.16 960402APO 0.375% 06/15/2002 DD 04/15/92 A- 1,021,516.30 2.36 900,000.00 TEXACO CAP INC RES TRSJ 5.026 7.I10 Al 100.902 913,563.00 3.70 88168LCJ3 ].]BOB 0I/01/02 DD 06/30/92 Af 900,218.00 2.10 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCURS SECURITIES 2.435 6.253 24,839,112.11 100.00 24,533,969.22 56.82 ________ _______ ---- 43,519,043.54 100.00 43,214,054.55 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PARE 1 6 OCSF07522202 2002/04/30 RUN DATE 1 05/06/02 DISTRICTi LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME , 08.54.05 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY HARRRT TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASE EQUIVALENTS 77,979,848.41 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HUNT .000 1.725 AAA 100.000 77,979,848.41 100.00 996065247 AAA 77,979,848.41 19.57 -------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 1.725 77,979,848.41 100.00 77,979,848.41 19.57 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA SF MTG .000 5.921 AAA 101.328 5,956,750.00 1.89 OIF060451 6.000E 05/01/2017 DD 05/01/01 AAA 6,079,697.50 1.53 I0j000t OOO.00 COMMIT TO PUR PUMA BF AID .000 6.069 AAA 99.859 9,765,625.DO 3.08 OIF060659 6.000% 05/01/2032 DD 05/01/01 AAA 9,095,937.50 2.48 10,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GUM SF MTO .000 6.41E AAA 101.281 10,565,625.00 3.31 OIN062656 6.500% 05/15/2032 DD 05/01/01 AAA 10,634,505.00 2.67 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR OEM SF RTG .000 7.556 AAA 105.875 14,783,125.00 4.62 O1H000658 8.000% 05/15/2032 DD D5/01/01 AAA 14,822,500.00 3.72 7,500,000.00 ANEEUSER BUSCH COB INC HT .000 6.736 At 100.206 7,646,250.00 2.34 035229AY9 6.750E 06/01/2005 DD 06/05/95 Aa 7,515,450.00 1.89 900,000.00 BEAR STEXAN6 MTN 9 TR 00459 .000 2.198 A2 100.078 999,406.00 .28 073928VC4 PITH AT 12/01/2003 DD 09/17/01 A 900,702.00 .23 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GUM II JUMSO .000 7.172 AAA 104.57E 1,246,500.00 .39 219072650 7.500E OS/20/2032 DD 05/01/01 AAA 1,254,937.56 .31 4,500,000.00 DAINLS . CHRYSLER NA CORP NT .000 2.756 A3 100.140 4,491,345.00 1.40 2338ISAM9 PLTG AT 12/16/2002 DO 12/15/00 Aa 4r506,300.00 1.13 776,713.72 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 .000 5.606 102.714 792,976.17 .24 25475HAD6 5.840E 10/15/2011 DD 03/18/99 797,793.73 .20 446o358.41 FRLNC GROW 4G4-0353 .000 7.319 AAA 102.472 457,656.85 .14 3128DBMA2 7.500E 10/01/2004 UP 03/01/99 AAA 457,392.39 .11 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOES IN BE CONS BOB .000 6.589 AAA 108.141 7,997,425.00 2.53 3133HAW7 7.125E 02/15/2003 DD 02/09/00 AAA 8,110,575.00 2.04 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t J OCSP07522202 2002/04/30 RON DATE 05/06/02 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE , 08.54.05 PAN VALUE YIN AT CEMENT NODDY SARXET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION 800E YIELD S-P PRICE SANEST VALUE 1 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 151,627.80 FRLNC GROUP I78-6064 .000 6.179 AAA 102.594 147,931.89 .04 31348SN83 6.304% 02/01/2020 DO 22/01/97 HAS 155,561.D3 .04 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL NTG ANNE DBBS .000 5.122 HAS 102.500 11,521,271.50 3.62 31359MJXZ 5.2501 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AAA 11,633,750.00 2.92 645,634.93 GMMA II POOL 00080395 .000 5.443 AAA 101.047 639,703.06 .20 36225CBM4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 652,394.73 .16 5,534,635.37 GMMA II POOL 108040OX .DOO 5.443 AAA 101.047 5,478,622.19 1.74 39225CH20 6.500% 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 AAA 5,592,705.10 2.40 4,000,000.00 GENERAL NTAN ACCEP STE 000615 .000 2.227 A2 99.250 3,999,440.00 1.23 37042MOO FITS AT 00/04/2003 DO 08/03/01 BBB. 3,970,000.00 1.00 4,000,000.00 MANI6C0 INC NTS .000 6.030 A2 101.537 4,081,440.00 1.26 629527CAS VAR AT 02/01/2033 DD 01/22/58 A 4,063,080.00 1.02 5,000,000.00 PBILIP MORRIS COS INC ME .000 2.079 A2 105.941 5,263,000.00 1.65 718134CHO 7.5001 04/01/2004 DD 04/01/97 A- 5,297,050.00 1.33 694,060.04 PANNIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 .000 6.314 AAA 101.943 507,801.08 .15 7404GRW6 6.430% 03/00/2004 DD 06/21/99 503,165.57 .13 4,029,964.01 SEA DID DEV PARTS 2001-20C 1 .000 6.186 AAA 1U2.495 4,029,964.01 1.29 83162CWO 6.340% 03/01/2021 AAA 4,230t5ll.61 1.04 2,997,107.69 SBA GTD PARTS CTFS 88IC-PS 01 .DUO 6.366 AAA 104.300 2,997,107.60 .97 831641DD4 6.6400 02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 3,225,983.31 .78 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PANSTBRD 01-1 C .000 8.094 BAI 84.395 1,600,000.00 .42 909317BC2 6.0310 09/02120DO DD O0122/01 A- 1,350,320.00 .34 6,178,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX AT .000 3.667 AAA 105.602 6,261,185.72 2.03 9128274Y5 3.875% 01/15/2009 DO O1/15/99 AAA 6,529,261.54 1.64 74,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 6.239 AAA 108.187 00,079,062.50 25.14 912827609 06.7501 05/15/2005 DO OS/IS/00 AAA 00,599,315.00 20.23 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PNR O1 SEE A .000 5.656 A3 101.461 3,487,680.00 1.11 927604BRO 5.350% 03/31/2006 DO 03/27/01 A- 3,558,135.00 .99 25,807,840.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX AT 3.817 3.254 AAA 103.719 22,909,927.57 0.35 9120272M3 3.325% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 AAA 26,767,633.57 6.12 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 8 OCSM7522202 2002/04/30 RUN DATE 05/06/02 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 1 08.54.05 PAR VALUE YTX AT CEMENT MOODY HARKHT TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MENU VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 1,400,000.00 BEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 5.261 6.359 A3 102.843 1,438,920.00 .44 81240OGN6 6.540E 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,439,802.00 .36 3,950,000.00 GNAC ME 5.052 2.036 A2 98.018 3,918,769.50 1.22 370425075 VAR RT O8/18/2003 ➢O 08/17/98 A 3,899,361.00 .98 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD XTN 5.049 6.577 A3 100.812 3,073,170.00 .94 812400JAI 6.630E 07/09/2002 DD 07/09/97 A- 3,024,360.00 .06 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR HY CORD GLOBAL NT 5.881 2.004 Al 99.818 1,992,800.00 .62 066365DX4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/96 AA- 1,996,360.00 .50 15,500,000.00 PEDENII, NAIL RIG MEN DEW 5.967 6.580 AAA 108.281 16,154,410.00 5.23 31359MFE1 3.125% 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 16,783,555.00 4.21 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECONNUNICATIONS 6.010 5.9BB AA2 100.201 7,497,255.00 2.34 079867MS VAR RT 06/15/2002 D➢ 06/15/90 AAA 7,515,075.00 1.09 3,000,000.00 BALTIHORE DAN 6 ELEC CO 6.011 6.598 A2 102.296 3,038,250.00 .95 059165DN7 6.050% 12/15/2002 OD 12/20/00 BBB+ 3,096,880.00 .77 I,SOO,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MIN OM00615 5.154 2.002 A3 99.906 1,499,415.00 .46 17120QBSO FLTG RT O8/O0/2002 DO 04/08/98 BBB+ 1,498,590.00 .38 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEW 6.271 2.060 Al 99.985 2,994,300.00 .93 209111CUS VAR RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/20/97 A+ 2,999,550.00 .25 3,000,000.00 DENERAi. MIRE ACCEP 4TR 00562 6.303 2.061 A2 99.468 3,793,958.00 1.17 30042NSK0 PLTG RT 02/14/2003 DO 02/14/00 A 3,339,784.00 .95 1,863,903.00 FNLMC MULTICLA88 MID SER E3 A 6.316 5.029 AAA 99.204 1,865,941.22 .59 3133=95 VAR RT 00/15/2032 DO 12/01/97 AAA 1,849,066.33 .46 1,526,799.76 DENA DID RBMIC TR 2000-9 PH 6.320 2.348 AAA 100.495 1,526,099.76 .43 383384NR9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,534,357.42 .39 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COB INC 6.330 6.546 A2 103.119 2,031,960.00 .64 O73902MI 6.350% 04/15/2003 A 2,062,380.00 .52 3,000,000.DO FORD HIR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.350 2.201 A3 99.062 3,000,000.00 .92 345397SRS TIM RT 03/17/2003 DO 03/16/00 A 2,971,860.00 .75 2,000,000.00 FORD MIR CR CO GLOBAL HIS 6.351 2.035 A3 99.140 1,992,500.00 .61 345397M PLTG RT 02/13/2003 DO 02/13/98 A 2,962,800.00 .50 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 9 MSP07522202 2002/04/30 ROB DATE t 05/06/02 DISTRICTt LONG-TERN OPERATING ROB TIM t 09.54.05 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT NODDY MAREBT TOTAL COOT/ R TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD B-P PRICE MMET VALUE 1 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 21,110.32 GUM POOL 00500917 6.389 6.042 AAA 99.312 20,038.32 .00 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AM 20,965.08 .01 66,507.83 GUM POOL #0306636 6.309 6.059 AAA 99.031 63,130.48 .02 36210YY90 6.0001 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 65,863.37 .02 BIB,865.66 GUM POOL #0503386 6.389 6.042 AAA 99.312 311,282.64 .25 3621OW55 6.000% 03/15/2029 DO 03/01/99 AAA 023,231.96 .20 23,903.30 GUM POOL 10499153 6.399 6.042 AAA 99.312 24,587.96 .00 3622000E5 6.0001 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 25,725.16 .01 6,013.47 GPM POOL #0496204 6.390 6.034 AAA 99.439 5,700.10 .00 3621OW51 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 5,979.61 .00 816,190.63 GEM POOL #0496461 6.390 6.034 AAA 99.437 734,743.43 .25 36210NQN4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 011,595.48 .20 227,541.29 GUM POOL /0491103 6.390 6.034 AAA 99.437 215,906.46 .07 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AM 226,260.23 .06 19,697.45 GEM POOL #0406720 6.390 6.059 AAA 99.031 18,887.03 .00 36210AW6 6.000E 12/15/2026 DO 12/01/98 AAA 19,704.54 .00 41,096.24 GUM POOL /0497343 6.390 6.034 AAA 99.437 39,009.33 .02 36210NP45 6.0001 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/90 AAA 40,864.B7 .01 40,376.06 GUM POOL #0469688 6.391 6.059 AAA 99.031 3B,325.12 .01 362099=8 6.000% 11/15/2020 DO 11/O1/90 AAA 39,984.82 .01 51,342.19 GUM POOL #0467279 6.391 6.034 AAA 99.433 48,734.90 .01 36209CCQ1 6.0001 10/15/2020 DO 10/01/96 AAA 51,053.13 .01 76,021.66 GUM POOL /0457814 6.391 6.059 AAA 99.031 72,161.19 •02 36208QSB3 6.DOD8 10/15/2020 DO 10/01/98 ARE 75,205.01 •02 684,614.53 GUM POOL #0467286 6.391 6.034 ARE 99.437 649,049.96 .21 36209CCA2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/98 AAA 680,760.15 .13 $25,201.74 OEM POOL 40465555 6.392 6.059 AAA 99.031 783,296.97 .25 36209AE49 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 09/01/98 AAA 817,205.54 .21 32,327.59 OEM POOL #0403452 6.392 6.034 AAA 99.431 30,485.94 .01 36209MV3 6.0006 09/15/2020 DO 09/01/98 AAA 32,145.59 .01 YLDMAL YIELD ARALYSIN PAGE 1 30 OCSF07522202 2002/04/30 RUN MIR 1 05/06/02 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME , 00.54.05 PAN VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL C0ST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD B-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 039,242.60 COMA POOL #0465546 6.392 6.059 AAA 99.031 796,624.99 .25 36209MT3 6.000% 08/15/2020 DO 08/01/98 AAA 831,110.42 .21 785,223.11 GNMA POOL #0468339 6.392 6.034 MA 99.437 745,348.52 .24 36209DED0 6.000% 08/15/2028 DO 08/01/98 AAA 780,002.30 .20 41,191.19 GORR POOL /0439057 6.393 6.034 AAA 99.437 39,099.46 .01 36207PTN9 6.0001 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/90 AAA 40,959.28 .02 37,303.64 OEM POOL #0468330 6.393 6.059 AAA 99.031 35,409.31 .02 36209DRF4 6.000% 05/15/2029 DO 05/01/98 AAA 36,942.17 .01 2,000,000.00 PELMC MULTICMBB CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.251 AAA 103.979 2,000,888.00 .64 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 ARA 2,079,500.00 .52 2,730,587.99 PHIM MULTICLASS CTF SIR 1620E 6.499 6.488 AAA 92.474 2,574,448.05 .70 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 AM 2,525,083.94 .63 I,OOD,000.00 eAIGMON BB BLD68 MEN 6.625 2.176 AA1 100.125 1,000,000.00 .31 7954BEREB VAR RT 04/28/2003 DO 04/29/00 M- 1,001,250.00 .25 1,828,096.36 PELKC GROUP 1G5-0476 6.628 6.943 AAA 100.826 1,856,660.37 .57 3128DDQSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 AAA 1,843,196.44 .46 921,466.58 GEM II POOL 1000008H 6.705 6.217 AAA 102.547 941,623.67 .29 36225CC20 7.375% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 AAA 944,936.33 .24 2,000,000.00 MARSE 6 MCLENNAN COS INC OR NT 6.717 6.280 A2 105.489 1,992,200.00 .65 571748M8 6.625% 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 2,109,760.00 .53 3,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.53E A3 102.476 2,995,080.00 .95 345397W3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DD 07/16/99 BBB+ 3,074,280.00 .77 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE SOME LM8 INC HT 6.066 6.502 A3 105.357 2,490,400.00 .82 22237UABB 6.850% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,633,925.00 .66 570,489.69 GEM II POOL #0080023 6.992 6.417 MA 103.234 579,938.44 .10 36225=9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AM 588,939.33 .25 7,000,000.00 OLD SENT OR MTN BE 00001 7.OB4 2.668 M3 99.012 7,000,000.00 2.27 67982YM6 VM RT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 A+ 6,996,840.00 2.75 2,100,000.00 FEDERM NAIL XTO ABBE DONE 7.113 6.270 AM 107.375 2,030,133.00 .70 31359M S 6.6251 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,254,975.00 .57 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 11 MBF07522202 2002/04/30 RUN DATE t 05/06/02 DISTRICT[ LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE t 08.54.05 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT NODDY BAREST 1VTAL COST/ 8 TYPE 88CORITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 8 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ _--------- 2,000,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 9.965 BAP3 102.945 2,151,250.00 .64 542671CT7 8.200E 03/15/2023 DD 03/28/93 A- 2,058,900.00 .52 800,698.64 ORRYSTONE MUG CORP PEA 195-7 7.564 3.405 AAA 100.281 796,684.04 .25 398IDIAE4 7.430% 06/01/2003 DD 02/29/00 AAA 810,973.10 .20 1,000,000.00 FORD WIDE. CR CO NI 7.502 6.656 A3 101.408 965,170.00 .31 345393GV9 6.750% 05/15/20DS BBB+ 1,014,000.00 .23 961,ODG.98 NNP/BUNYOON PAIGE 1000-12150 7.684 9.503 AM 99.031 940,135.11 .29 302998GE3 3.500% 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 951,697.22 .24 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD BYE ITR 00115 3.309 6.902 A2 105.224 2,950,530.00 .99 69512EEV5 7.300% 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 A 3,173,220.00 .80 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 2.967 0.252 Al 1U8.569 1,594,032.00 .54 020002AL5 7.875% 05/01/2005 DO 05/01/00 A+ 1,737,424.00 .44 ________ _______ _________________ --------- FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 1.434 5.625 314,272,991.92 100.00 320,505,906.96 80.47 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 1.428 5.602 392,252,840.33 100.00 398,465,755.37 100.OD Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: I PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000/0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 149,259.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2002 -149,259.38 996085247 01-Apr-2002 149,259.38 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 149,259.38 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2002 -149,259.38 996085247 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 01-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,240,979.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2002 -18,240,979.72 996085247 01-Apr-2002 18,240,979.72 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,240,979.72 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Apr-2002 -18,240,979.72 996085247 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 01-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 144,721.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2002 -144,721.27 996085247 02-Apr-2002 144,721.27 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 144,721.27 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2002 -144,721.27 996085247 02-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 02-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-2002 13:47:20 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE- 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINH.OSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Apr-2002 -49,931,166.67 313397WE7 MAT 04/30/2002 02-Apr-2002 49,931,166.67 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Apr-2002 -49,931,166.67 313397WE7 MAT 04/30/2002 02-Apr-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DIS 02-Apr-2002 -9,087,472.33 313397WE7 MAT04130/2002 02-Apr-2002 9,087,472.33 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Apr-2002 -9,087,472.33 313397WE7 MAT 04/30/2002 02-Apr-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,033,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NT 02-Apr-2002 -2,028,019.15 313397XB2 MAT 05/21/2002 02-Apr-2002 2,028,019.15 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,033,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC NT 02-Apr-2002 -2,028,019.15 313397XB2 MAT 05/21/2002 02-Apr-2002 0.00 PC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 02-Apr-2002 -2,094,674.75 313589XDO MAT 05/23/2002 02-Apr-2002 2,094,674.75 B SMITH BARNEY,HARRIS UPHAM& 0.00 07-Mny-1001 13:47:20 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trost-Sample Report PAGE: -3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,100,0D0.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 02-Apr-2002 -2,094,674.75 313589XDO MAT 05/23/2002 02-Apr-2002 0.00 FC SMITH BARNEY,HARRIS UPHAM& 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 233,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Apr-2002 -232,061.01 313397YH8 MAT 06/20/2002 03-Apr-2002 232,061.01 B CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 233,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 03-Apr-2002 -232,061.01 313397YHB MAT 06/20/2002 03-Apr-2002 0.00 FC CHASE SECURITIES,NEW YORK 03-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 537,103.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2002 -537,103.13 996085247 04-Apr-2002 537,103.13 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 537,103.13 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-Apr-2002 -537,103.13 996085247 04-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 04-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 204,920.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Apr-2002 -204,820.00 996085247 08-Apr-2002 204,820.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 204,820.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Apr-2002 -204,820.00 996085247 08-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 08-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-2002 /3:47:20 &,wi.Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.' 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS600/0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,129,333.35 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT I1-Apr-2002 -10,129,333.35 996087094 1I-Apr-2002 10,129,333.35 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,129,333.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Apr-2002 -10,129,333.35 996095247 12-Apr-2002 10,129,333.35 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,129,333.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Apr-2002 •10,129,333.35 996085247 12-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 12-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,287,886.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Apr-2002 -1,287,886.88 996085247 15-Apr-2002 1,287,886.99 g 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,287,886.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Apr-2002 -1,287,886.88 996085247 15-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 733,645.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Apr-2002 -733,645.08 996085247 15-Apr-2002 733,645.08 g 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 733,645.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Apr-2002 -733,645.08 996085247 15•Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 07-Map2002 13:47.20 Ereculfw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: •5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,683.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2002 -20,683.00 996085247 16-Apr-2002 20,683.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,683.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2002 -20,683.00 996085247 16-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 16-Apr•2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,600,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 17-Apr-2002 -10,600,000.00 99391L631 01.700%04/18/2002 DD 04/17/ 17-Apr-2002 10,600,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,600,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 17-Apr-2002 -10,600,000,00 99391L631 01.700%04/182002 DD 04/17/ 17-Apr-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 17-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,719.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Apr-2002 -7,719.31 996085247 IS-Apr-2002 7,719.31 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,719.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-Apr-2002 -7,719.31 996095247 18-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 18-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,900,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 18-Apr-2002 -10,900,000.00 9939IM993 01.720%04/192002 DO 04/18/ 18-Apr-2002 10,900,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-Ma)4001 13:47.20 Evecurive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCS&CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,900,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO I8-Apr-2002 -10,900,000.00 99391M993 01.720%04/19/2002 DO 04/191 18-Apr-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY I8-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,100,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 19-Apr-2002 -11,100,000.00 99391PO46 01.670%04122/2002 DD 04/19/ 19-Apr-2002 11,100,000.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,100,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 19-Apr-2002 -11,100,000.00 99391F046 01.670%04/222002 DO 04/19/ 19-Apr-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 19-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,033.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Apr-2002 -6,033.75 996DS5247 22-Apr-2002 6,033.75 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,033.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Apr-2002 -6,033.75 9%085247 22-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 22-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,400,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 22-Apr-2002 -11,400,000.00 99391QIOI 01.670%04232002 DO 04221 22-Apr-2002 11,400,000.00 B LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO 11,400,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 22-Apr-2002 -11,400,000.00 99391Q101 01.670%04232002 DO 04221 22-Apr-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 22-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-2002 13:47:20 Ereeurrve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsG000l0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE( COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,400,528.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Apr-2002 -11,400,529.83 996085247 23-Apr-2002 11,400,528.83 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,400,529.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-Apr-2002 -11,400,528.83 996095247 23-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 23-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,344,712.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2002 4,344,712.50 996085247 24-Apr-2002 7,344,712.50 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,344,712.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-Apr-2002 -7,344,712.50 996085247 24-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 24-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,938.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2002 -13,938.43 996085247 25-Apr-2002 13,938.43 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,938.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2002 -13,938.43 996085247 25-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 25-Apr•2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 111,352.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2002 -111,352.92 996085247 25-Apr-2002 111,352.92 B 0.00 07-Ma -2002 13:47.20 Execudw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 111,352.92 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Apr-2002 -111,352.92 996085247 25-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 25-Apr-2002 -997,700.00 63743DFA4 06/10/2002 25-Apr-2002 997,700.00 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 25-Apr-2002 -997,700.00 63743DFA4 06/102002 25-Apr-2002 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,CHA 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-Apr-2002 -1,497,520.83 02581SEV9 05292002 25-Apr-2002 1,497,520.93 B BANKERS TRUST CPAPA,NEW YO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-Apr-2002 -1,497,520.83 02581SEV9 05292002 25-Apr-2002 0.00 FC BANKERS TRUST CPAPA.NEW YO 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,458.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2002 -1,458.33 996095247 26-Apr-2002 1,458.33 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,458.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2002 -1,458.33 996085247 26-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 26-Apr-2002 0.00 07-Ma3-2002 13:47.20 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sam le Re ort PAGE: 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000I0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 62,371.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2002 -62,371.00 996085247 26-Apr-2002 62,371.00 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 62,371.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 26-Apr-2002 -62,371.00 996095247 26-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 26-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 26-Apr-2002 -1,498,541.67 5007MIE64 05/16/2002 26-Apr-2002 1,498,541.67 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 26-Apr-2002 -1,493,541.67 5007MIE04 05/16/2002 26-Apr-2002 0.00 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 26-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,207.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Apr-2002 -5,207.22 996085247 29-Apr-2002 5,207.22 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,207.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Apr-2002 -5,207.22 996085247 29-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 29-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 59,100,452.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2002 -59,100,452.52 996085247 30-Apr-2002 59,100,452.52 B 0.00 07-May-2002 13:47:20 Ereourme Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE' 10 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 59,100,452.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-Apr-2002 .59,100,452.52 996095247 30-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 30-Apr-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 28-Feb-2002 -6,070,312.50 0IF060444 6.000%04/012017 DO 04/0V 16-Apr-2002 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NAIL TR&SVGS CT I6-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 06-Mar-2002 -9,837,500.00 0IF060642 6.000%04/012032 DO 04/0V II-Apr-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 11-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Mar-2002 .3,479,219.75 OIND62649 6.5WA 04/152032 DO 041011 19-Apr-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 18-Apr.2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Mar-2002 6,971,562.50 OIND62649 6.500%04/152032 DO 04/01/ 18-Apr-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 18-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Mar-2002 -14,682,500.00 OIN080641 8.000%04/152032 DID 04/01/ 18-Apr-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 19-Apr.2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 15-Mar-2002 - -1,238,250.00 21HO72643 7.5001A 04202032 DD 04101/ 18-Apr-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK I8-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May1001 13:47.20 &r wi.Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. PORTFOLIO DETAIL GCSG00010000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTG 19-Mar-2002 5,958,750.00 0IF060451 6.000%05/012017 DD 05/0V 16-May-2002 -5,958,750.00 BC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 19-Mar-2002 -5,958,750.00 0IF060451 6.000%05/0112017 DD 051011 16-May-2002 5,958,750.00 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 08-Apr-2002 -9,765,625.00 0IF060659 6.000%05/012032 DD 05/011 13-May-2002 9,765,625.00 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBO 10-Apr-2002 -1,246,500.00 21HO72650 7.500%05202032 DO 05/01/ 21-May-2002 1,246,500.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 11-Apr-2002 -3,513.125.00 DIN062656 6.500%0 511 52 0 3 2 DD 051011 21-May-2002 3,513,125.00 B SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2002 -14,783,125.00 0IMS0658 8.000%0 511 52 03 2 DO 05101/ 21-May-2002 14,793,125.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2002 -7,052,500.00 OIN062656 6.500%0 511 52 03 2 DD 051011 21-May-2002 7,052,500.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 07-May-1001 13:47.20 Ereeariw Wwkheach Q maoR Trust-Sample Report PAGE 12 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 NIAGARA MOHAWK PWR CORP ST 16-Apr-2002 -1,011,460.00 653522CQ3 5.873%09/012002 DD D9/01/9 19-Apr-2002 1,011,460.00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 NIAGARA MOHAWK PWR CORP ST 16-Apr-2002 -7,933.33 653522CQ3 5.975%09/012002 DD 09/0119 19-ApP2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 NIAGARA MOHAWK PWR CORP ST 16-Apr-2002 -1,019.293.33 653522CQ3 5.875%09/012002 DD 09/01/9 19-Apr2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 NATURAL RURAL UI7LS COOP FIN 16-Apr-2002 413,064.00 637432CK9 7.375%02/102003 DO 02/10/0 19-Apr2002 413,064.00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 NATURAL RURAL UITLS COOP FIN 16-Apr-2002 .5,654.17 637432CK9 7.375%02/1MAW DO 02/10/0 I9-Apr-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 NATURAL RURAL UIILS COOP FIN 16-Apr-2002 418,718.17 637432CK9 7.375%02/102003 DO 02/1= 19-Apr-2002 0.00 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER 19-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 610,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 26-Apr-2002 -622,102.40 3133MCUE3 5.125%01/132003 DO 01/12/ 29-Apr-2002 622,102.40 B FHWTENNESSEERANKNAMEM O.OD 07-May-2002 13:47:20 Emultw wi;umth Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: /3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARPS/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY 1D TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMOO 610,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 26-Apr.2002 -9,205.07 3133MCUE3 5.125%01/132003 DO 01/121 29-Apr-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 610,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BE.CONS BDS 26-Apr-2002 -631,307.47 3133MCUE3 5.125%01/132003 DO 01/12/ 29-Apr-2002 0.00 PC FIRST TENNESSEE BANK N A MEM 29-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 26-Apr-2002 -102,392.00 3133M23D7 5.610%01232003 DO 012319 29-Apr-2002 102,392.00 B FIRST TENNESSEE BANK BOND DI 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO I00,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 26-Apr-2002 -1,496.00 31337.23D7 5.610%01232003 DO 012319 29-Apr-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 26-Apr-2002 -103,888.00 3133M23D7 5.610%01232003 DO 01/239 29-Apr-2002 0.00 PC FIRSTTENNESSEE BANK BOND DI 29-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 195,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 26-Apr-2002 -199,594.20 3133M2A56 3.660%01/132003 DO 01/139 29-Apr-2002 199,594.20 B FIRST TENNESSEE BANK BOND DI 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 195,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BDS 26-Apr-2002 -3,249.78 3133M2A56 5.660%01/132003 DD 01/139 29-Apr-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 07-MaP,2001 13:47:20 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: /4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 195,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 26-Apr-2002 -202,843.98 3133M2A56 5.660%01/13/2003 DO 01/13/9 29-Apr-2002 0.00 FC FIRST TENNESSEE BANK BOND DI 29-Apr-2002 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,585.11 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2002 -13,585.11 3133T17A4 6.0000/.11/15/2023 DO 1110119 01-Apr-2002 13,585.11 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,585.11 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Apr-2002 •13,585.11 3133T17A4 6.000%11/15/2023 DD 1110119 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 22-Apr-2002 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,099,744.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2002 19,099,744.19 996085247 02-Apr-2002 -19,099,744.19 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,099,744.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02•Apr-2002 19,099,744.19 996085247 02-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -32,061.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-Apr-2002 32,061.01 996085247 03-Apr-2002 -32,061.01 S 0.00 07-Map1001 13:4710 Ereeurlw Workbench " Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -32.061.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03•Apr-2002 32,061.01 996085247 03-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 03-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,129,333.35 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 12-Apr-2002 10,129,333.35 996097094 12-Apr-2002 -10,129,333.35 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,995.82 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2002 26,995.82 996085247 16-Apr-2002 -26,9195.82 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,995.82 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-Apr-2002 26,995.92 996085247 16-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,597,618.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2002 10,597,618.54 996095247 17-Apr-2002 -10,597,618.54 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,597,618.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-Apr-2002 10,597,618.54 996095247 17-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 17-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,600,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO I8-Apr-2002 10,600,000.00 9939IL631 01.700%04/19/2002 DD 04/17/ 18-Apr-2002 -10,600,000.00 S LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-May-2002 13:47.20 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000/0000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,600,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 18-Apr-2002 500.56 99391L631 01.700%0411812002 DO 04/17/ 18-Apr-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,600,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO IS-Apr-2002 10,600,500.56 99391L631 01.700%04/18/2002 DO 041171 18-Apr-2002 0.00 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY I8-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,438,011.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Apr-2002 1,438,011.50 996085247 19-Apr-2002 -1,438,011.50 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,438,011.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Apr-2002 1,438,011.50 996085247 19-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 19-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -199,479.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Apr-2002 199,479.22 996085247 19-Apr-2002 199,479.22 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -199,479.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Apr-2002 199,479.22 996085247 19-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 19-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,900,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 19-Apr-2002 10,900,000.00 99391M993 01.720%04/192002 DD 04119/ 19-Apr-2002 -10,900,000.00 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY 0.00 07-Ma 2002 13:47.20 Erecuriw Z,kberuwh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,900,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 19-Apr-2002 520.78 9939IM993 01.720%04/192002 DO 04/18/ 19-Apr-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,900,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 19-Apr-2002 10,900,520.78 99391M993 01.720%04/192002 DO 04/18/ 19-Apr-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 19-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,100,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 22-Apr-2002 11,100,000.00 99391PO46 01.670%04222002 DO 04/19/ 22-Apr-2002 -11,100,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC.NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,100,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 22-Apr-2002 1,544.75 99391PO46 01.670%04222002 DD 04/191 22-Apr-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,100,000.00 LEHMAN OSI REPO 22-Apr-2002 11,101,544.75 99391PO46 01.670%04222002 DO 04/191 22-Apr-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 22-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,400,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 23-Apr-2002 11,400,000.00 99391QIOI 01.670%04232002 DD 04/W 23-Apr-2002 -11,400,000.00 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,400,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 23-Apr-2002 528.83 99391QIOI 01.670%04232002 DO 04/221 23-Apr-2002 0.00 1S 0.00 07-MaP,2002 13:47:20 E'ecultw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: /B PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l 0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,400,000.00 LEHMAN GSI REPO 23-Apr-2002 11,400,528.83 99391QIOI 01.670%04/23/2002 DO 04/22/ 23-Apr-2002 0.00 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY 23-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -939,039.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Apr-2002 938,039.45 996085247 29-Apr-2002 -938,039.45 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -938,039.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-Apr-2002 938,039.45 996085247 29-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 29-Apr-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 19-Mer-2002 5,981,015.63 0IF060444 6.000%04/01/2017 DD 041011 16-Apr-2002 0.00 FC BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 16-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 08-Apr-2002 9,805,859.38 01F060642 6.000%04/01/2032 DO 041011 11-Apr-2002 -9,837,5000 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY -31,640.62 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10.000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 08-Apr-2002 9,805,859.39 0IF060642 6.000%04/01/2032 DD 04/01/ 11-Apr-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 1 I-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 10-Apr-2002 1,250,156.25 21HO72643 7.500%04/202032 DD 041011 18-Apr-2002 -1,239,250.00 S SALOMON BROS MC,NEW YORK 11,906.25 07-May-2002 13:47.20 Executive W6rkbench " Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE- /9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA II JUMBOS 10-Apr-2002 1,250,156.25 21H072643 7.500%04/202032 DO 04101/ 18-Apr-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 18-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 11-Apr-2002 3,52M64.06 OIN062649 6.500%0411Sn032 DO 04101/ 18-Apr-2002 -3,482,500.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 45,664.06 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.W COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTO 11-Apr-2002 3,528,164.06 OIN062649 6.500%04/152032 DO 04101/ 18-Apr-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK IS-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Apr.2002 14,818,125.00 OIN0B0641 8.000%04/152032 DO 04Po1/ 18-Apr-2002 -14,682,500.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 135,625.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 15-Apr-2002 14,818,125.00 OIN080641 8.000%04/152032 DO 04/01/ 18-Apr-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 18-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR ONMA SF MTO 15-Apr-2002 7,082,304.69 OIN062649 6.5001A 04/152032 DD 04/01/ 18-Apr-2002 -6,968,281.25 S BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 114,023.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR ONMA SF MTO IS-Apr-2002 7,092,304.69 OIN062649 6.500%04/152032 DO 04101/ 1&Apr-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY I9-Apr-2002 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 07-May-2002 13:47:20 Er a ttw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,427.70 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Mar-2002 7,427.70 31348SWZ3 6,384%01/012028 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -664.92 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-Ma-2002 664.92 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DD 10/21/9 01-Mar-2002 0.00 PC 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -62,378.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Mar-2002 62,378.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DO 12/01/ 01-Mar-2002 -62,446.71 PD -68.21 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -62,378.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 01-Mar-2002 62,378.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 DD 12/01/ 01-Mar-2002 0.00 FC 26-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -58.73 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Apr-2002 58.73 36209EXR8 6.000%11/132028 DD II/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -55.75 PD 2.98 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -58.73 GNMA POOL#0469688 01-Apr-2002 58.73 36209EXRS 6.000%11/152028 DO 11/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,034.60 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Apr-2002 1,034.60 36209DHQO 6.000%08/15/2028 DO 08/01/ 01-Apr•2002 -982.06 PD 52.54 07-May-2002 13:47.20 Erec.aw Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PACE, 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINIIASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,034.60 GNMA POOL40469339 01-Apr-2002 1,034.60 36209DHQO 6.000%08/15/2028 DO 08/011 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -70.41 GNMA POOL80468330 01-Apr-2002 70.41 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2029 DO 05/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -66.93 PD 3.58 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -70.41 GNMA POOLM0468330 01-Apr-2002 70AI 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,276.51 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Apr-2002 1,276.51 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2029 DD 091011 01-Apr-2002 -1,211.69 PD 64.92 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.276.51 GNMA POOLA0465555 01-Apr-2002 1,276.51 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/011 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -1,050.96 GNMA POOL80467286 01-Apr-2002 1,050.96 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 101011 01-Apr-2002 -997.59 PD 53.37 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,050.96 GNMA POOL80467286 01-Apr-2002 1,050.96 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 07-Mnp2002 13:47:20 Eucutim Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .79.77 GNMA POOL#0467279 01-Apr-2002 79.77 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/1 51202 8 DO 10/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -75.72 PD 4.05 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -79.77 GNMA POOLs0467279 01-Apr-2002 79.77 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -44.46 GNMA POOL80483452 01-Apr-2002 44.46 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Apr-2002 42.20 PD 2.26 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44.46 GNMA POOL80483452 01-Apr-2002 44.46 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 09/011 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -188.84 GNMA POOL80486720 01-Apr-2002 188.84 36210AVM6 6.000°A 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -179.25 PD 9.59 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -189.84 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Apr-2002 188.84 36210AVM6 6.000%12/15/2028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,279.77 GNMA POOLW0491103 01-Apr-2002 3,279.77 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029 DO 01/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -3,113.22 PD 166.55 07-May-2002 13:47.20 Execuliv¢Workbemh Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARESTAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,279.77 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Apr-2002 3,279.77 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029 DO 011011 01-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.88 GNMA POOL 00497343 01-Apr-2002 55.99 3621 ONP45 6.000%12/152028 DO 121011 01-Apr-2002 -53.04 PD 2.84 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55.88 ONMA POOL#0497343 01-Apr-2002 55.88 362IONP45 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,120.57 GNMA POOL#04%461 01-Apr-2002 1,120.57 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -1,063.67 PD $6.90 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,120.57 GNMA POOL 00496461 01-Apr-2002 1.120.57 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029 DO 01/01/ 01-Apo-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,567.32 GNMA POOL#0496284 01-Apr-2002 3,567.32 36210M151 6.000%01/152029 DO 02/011 01-Apo-2002 -3,396.17 PD 181.15 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,567.32 GNMA POOL#0496284 01-Apr-2002 3,56732 36210M751 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 07-Maj4002 13.47.20 Emorhe Workbewh Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE.. 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/IASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 464,332.28 FHLMC GROUP#G5-0476 01-Apr-2002 464,332.29 3128DDQ55 7.0009%021012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2002 471,587.47 PD -7,255.19 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 464,332.28 FHLMC GROUP#05-0476 01-Apr-2002 464,332.29 3128DDQ55 7.00W.02/012003 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,819.19 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-Apr-2002 22,819.19 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 03101/ 01-Apr-2002 -23,396.80 PD .577.61 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,819.19 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-Apr-2002 22,819.19 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/012004 DD 031011 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50.90 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Apr-2002 50.80 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028 DO 051011 01-Apr-2002 48.22 PD 2.58 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50.80 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Apr-2002 50.80 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Apr.2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -110.23 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-Apr-2002 110.23 36208QSB3 6.0000/10/152028 DO 10/011 01-Apr-2002 -104.63 PD 5.60 07-MaP-1002 13:47.20 Erecurrve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE.. 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -110.23 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-Apr-2002 110.23 36208QSB3 6.000Y10/152028DD10/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -105.92 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Apr-2002 105.92 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -100.54 PD 5.38 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -105.92 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Apr-2002 105.92 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -32.52 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Apr-2002 32.52 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -30.87 PD 1.65 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .32.52 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Apr-2002 32.52 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029DD02/OI/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26.05 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Apr-2002 26.05 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -24.73 PD 1.32 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .26.05 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Apr-2002 26.05 36210SPA0 6.000%04/152029 DO 041011 01-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 07-Ma3-2002 13:47.20 E:eculm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29,843.95 GNMA POOL80503388 01-Apr-2002 29,843.95 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DO 031011 01-Apr-2002 -28,328.44 PD 1,515.51 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29,843.95 GNMA POOL80503388 01-Apr-2002 29,843.95 36210VF55 6.0000/.03/15/2029 DO 03/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC I5-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,096.03 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Apr-2002 22,086.03 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04/202030 DO 04/011 01-Apr-2002 -21,885.88 PD 200.15 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,096.03 GNMA 11 POOL#0090395 01-Apr-2002 22,086.03 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04202030DD04/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 22-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,652.45 GNMA II POOL 80080023 01-Apr-2002 25,652.45 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 17J202026 DO 12/01/9 01-Apr-2002 -26,077.32 PD -424.87 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,652.45 GNMA U POOL#0080023 01-Apr-2002 25,652.45 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DD 1210119 01-Apr4002 0.00 FC 22-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,464.29 GNMA POOL80465546 01-Apr-2002 9,464.29 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -8,983.68 PD 480.61 07-May-2002 13:47.20 Eremlim Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,464.29 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Apr-2002 9,464.29 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028 DD 08/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,869.25 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 01-Apr-2002 6,869.25 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -6,701.81 PD 167.44 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,760.32 GNMA II POOL#080088M 01-Apr-2002 22,760.32 36225CC20 7.375%06/202027 DO 06/01/ 01-Apr-2002 -23,258.20 PD -497.88 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,760.32 GNMA 1I POOL#080088M 01-Apr-2002 22,760.32 36225CC20 7.375%06202027 DD 06Po1/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 22-Apo-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -196,354.45 GNMA II POOL 0080408X 01-Apr-2002 1%,354.45 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 051011 01-Apr-2002 -194,360.23 PD 1,994.22 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -196,354.45 GNMA II POOL#080408X 01-Apr-2002 196,354.45 36225CN28 6.700%0520/2030 DO 051011 01-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 22-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -41,232.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTO SER E3 01-Apr-2002 41,232.00 3133TCE95 VAR RT OS/152032 DO 121011 01-Apr-2002 41,277.09 PD -45.09 07-Ma3,1002 13:47:20 Execurlm Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -638.72 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Apr-2002 639.72 39810sAE4 7.430%06/01/2003 DO 02/2910 01-Apr-2002 -629.39 PD 9.33 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -638.72 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Apr.2002 638.72 398108AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 02/29M 01-Apr.2002 0.00 PC 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,939.96 PREMIER AUTO TR 99.3 CL A4 08-Apr-2002 5,939.96 74046RFW6 6.430%03/09/2004 DD 0621/9 08-Apr-2002 -6,105.17 PD -165.21 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,939.96 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL AA 08-Apr.2002 5,939.96 74046RFW6 6.430%03/082004 DO 0621/9 09-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 08-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -62,759.21 DISTRIBUTION FINE 99-1 CL A4 15-Apr-2002 62,759.21 25475MAD6 5.840%10/152011 DO 03/18/9 15-Apr-2002 -64,073.23 PD -1,314.02 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -62,759.21 DISTRIBUTION FINE 99-1 CL A4 15-Apr-2002 62,759.21 25475MAD6 5.840%10/1 52 0 1 1 DD03/HV9 15-Apr-2002 0.00 PC 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -62.775.31 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 20ON9 PH 16-Apr-2002 62,775.31 3837H4NX9 VARRT02/162030 16-Apr-2002 -62,775.31 PD 0.00 07-May-1001 13:47:20 Evmtiw Wdrkbemh ' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATEI COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -62,775.31 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH I6-Apr-2002 62,775.31 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Apr-2002 0.00 FC 16-Apr-2002 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -68,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 01-Apr-2002 67,986,248.89 313397UZ2 MAT 04/01/2002 01-Apr-2002 -67,986,248.89 MT 01-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,262,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 02-Apr-2002 4,253,505.60 313397VA6 MAT 04/02/2002 02-Apr-2002 -4,253,505.60 MT 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 03-Apr-2002 199,801.11 313313VBI MAT 04/032001 03-Apr-2002 -199,801.11 MT 03-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 08-Apr-2002 199,751.39 313385VG8 MAT 04/08/2002 08-Apr-2002 -199,751.39 MT 08-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO -1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-Apr-2002 1,493,287.50 02581SDR9 0425/2002 25-Apr-2002 -1,493,287.50 MT 25-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-2002 13:47.20 Eeeearive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRI"ION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 25-Apr-2002 991,308.33 07598SDRI 04/25/2002 25-Apr-2002 -991,308.33 MT 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -55,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2002 54,621.26 313397VZI MAT 0425/2002 25-Apr-2002 -54,621.26 MT 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 26-Apr-2002 1,496,587.50 5007MIDS9 0426/2002 26-Apr-2002 -1,496,587.50 MT 26-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -59,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 30-Apr-2002 59,018,639.00 313397WE7 MAT 04/302002 30-Apr-2002 -59,018,639.00 MT 30-Apr-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,935,178.00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 14-Feb-2002 -1,935,178.00 79549BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 14-Feb-2002 1,794,854.30 MTC I4-Feb-2002 -140,323.70 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,931,524.59 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 14-Feb-2002 1,931,524.59 79549BBGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/141 14-Feb-2002 -1,794,854.30 MT 14-Feb-2002 136,670.29 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -145,000.00 DONALDSON LUFKIN IENRETT 01-Apr-2002 145,000.00 257661AHI 5.875%04/012002 DO 0323/9 01-Apr-2002 -147,009.70 MT 01-Apr-2002 -2,009.70 07-May-2002 13:47.20 Executive Workbench' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcsG000l0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY 11) TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 04-Apr.2002 500,000.00 3133ME6R7 4.500%04/04/2002 DO 04104/0 04-Apr-2002 -502,690.00 MT 04-Apr-2002 -2,690.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -25,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN UK CONS BUS 04-Apr-2002 25,000.00 3133M05X5 6.825%04/04/2002 DO 04/04/ 04-Apr-2002 -25,468.00 MT 04-Apr-2002 -468.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 GOLDEN WEST FINL CORP DEL SU 15-Apr-2002 1,200,000.00 381317AF3 8.375%04/15/2002 DO 04/3019 15-Apr-2002 -1,237,614.00 MT 15-Apr-2002 -37,614.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -20,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 16-Apr-2002 20,000.00 3134AITEO 6.830%04/16/2002 DD 04/16/ 16-Apr-2002 -20,402.20 MT 16-Apr.2002 402.20 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 24-Apr-2002 7,300,000.00 682680A32 FLTG RT 04/24/2002 DD 0424/ 24-Apr-2002 .7,300,000.00 MT 24-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -50,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BDS 25-Apr-2002 50,000.00 3133MA2ZI 6.295%04/252002 DO 10251 25-Apr-2002 -50,932.50 MT 25-Apr-2002 -932.50 CORPORATE ACTIONS 07-Map2002 13:47.20 Erecalrve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,653.41 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 13-Feb-2002 0.00 79549BROI SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS 1 13-Feb-2002 0.00 S W 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,940.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2002 0.00 9128274Y5 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Apr-2002 0.00 SO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,280.00 REPS INFLATION ADJUSTMENT 30-Apr-2002 0.00 9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 30-Apr-2002 0.00 SO 0.00 INTEREST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 145,000.00 DONALDSON LUFKIN IENRETT 01-Apr-2002 4,259.38 257661AHI 5.875%04/01/2002 DO 03/23/9 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS 01-Apr-2002 197,500.00 718154CH8 7.500%04/01/2004 DD 04/01/9 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR 01 SER A 01-Apr-2002 100,625.00 927804ENO 5.750%03/31/2006 DO 03/2710 30-Met-2002 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-1002 13:47:20 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 01-Apr-2002 3,640.00 313397UZ2 MAT 04/01/2002 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 01-Apr-2002 10,111.11 313397UZ2 MAT 04/01/2002 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 01-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2002 64,574.28 996085247 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-Apr-2002 5,415.17 996085247 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,262,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTO CORP DIS 02-Apr-2002 8,494.40 313397VA6 MAT 04/02/2002 02-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 664.92 WMPMUNTOON PAIGE N000.11150 02-Apr-2002 6,010.45 302998GE3 7.5001/6 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/9 01-Ma 2002 0.00 IT 02-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 03-Apr-2002 198.89 313313VBI MAT 04/03/2001 03-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 03-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-1001 13:47.20 Eiecurive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE. 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 25,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 04-Apr-2002 853.13 3133M05X5 6.825%04/042002 DO 04/04/ 04-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 04-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 04-Apr-2002 11,250.00 3133ME6R7 4.500%04/04/2002 DO 04/0410 04-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 04-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS SYS MTN 08-Apr-2002 4,820.00 31331RD44 4.820%10/072002 DID 10/07/ 07-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 08-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 08-Apr-2002 248.61 313385VG8 MAT 04/082002 08-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 08-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,939.96 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 08-Apr-2002 2,679.17 74046RFW6 6.430%0 3/0 920 0 4 DO 0621/9 08-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 08-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 GOLDEN WEST FINL CORP DEL SO 15-Apr-2002 50,250.00 381317AF3 8.375%04/152002 DO D413019 15-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MTN#TR 00343 15-Apr-2002 2,626.88 52517PQG9 VAR RT 07/152002 DID 07/121 15-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-1001 13.47.20 Erecutiw Wdrkbeach ' Q Mellon Trust- Sample Report PAGE.. 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000/0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 TEXACO CAP INC MTN TR57 15-Apr-2002 35,010.00 881681,03 T780%07/01/02 DO 06/30/92 15-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 15-Apr-2002 67,500.00 073902AHI 6.750%04/15/2003 15-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,279.77 GNMA POOL#0491103 15-Apr-2002 1,154AI 36210FRY4 6.0000/.01/15/2029 DO 01/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,567.32 GNMA POOL#0496284 15-Apr-2002 47.90 36210MJ51 6.000%01/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,120.57 GNMA POOL#0496461 15-Apr-2002 4,086.56 36210MQN4 6.000%01/152029DD01/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55.88 GNMA POOL#0497343 15-Apr-2002 205.76 36210NP45 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 32.52 GNMA POOL#0499153 15-Apr-2002 129.68 3621000E5 6.000%O2/152029 DO 02/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-2002 13:47.20 Ececudw Workbeac6 Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSO-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 26.05 GNMA POOL#0500917 15-Apr-2002 105.68 36210SPAO 6.000°/h04/15/2029 DO 04/011 01-Apr-2002 0.00 1T 15-AprQ002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 29,843.95 GNMA POOL#0503388 15-Apr-2002 4,243.55 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029DD03/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,819.19 FHLMC GROUP#04-0353 15-Apr-2002 2,932.36 3128DBMA2 7.500% 10/01/2004 DO 03/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 464,332.29 FHLMC GROUP#G"476 15-Apr-2002 13,372.50 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 105.92 GNMA POOL#0506636 15-Apr-2002 333.07 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50.80 GNMA POOL#0438057 15-Apr-2002 206.21 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,427.70 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 15-Apr-2002 877.60 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-M#r-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 07-Map-1001 13:47.20 Esecurin Workbench' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE' 37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 110.23 GNMA POOL#0457814 15-Apr-2002 380.66 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 9,464.29 GNMA POOL 40465546 15-Apr-2002 4,243.53 36209AET3 6.000%08/15/2028DD08/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,276.51 GNMA POOL#0465555 15-Apr-2002 4,132.39 36209AE48 6.0001/09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 79.77 GNMA POOL#0467279 15-Apr-2002 257.11 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,050.% GNMA POOL#0467286 15-Apr-2002 3,428.33 36209CCX2 6,000%10/152028 DD 10/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 70.41 GNMA POOL#0468330 15-Apr-2002 186.87 36209DHF4 6.000°A05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,034.60 GNMA POOL#0468339 15-Apr-2002 3,931.29 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-2002 13:47.20 &eemfve Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHAREWPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 58.73 GNMA POOL80469688 15-Apr-2002 202.17 36209EXR8 6.000%11/15/2028 DD I I/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44.46 GNMA POOL 80483452 15-Apr-2002 161.86 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 188.94 GNMA POOL 80486720 15-Apr-2002 100.43 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 62,759.21 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 15-Apr-2002 4,085.44 25475MAD6 5.840%10/152011 DD 03/19/9 15-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 15-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 20,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 16-Apr-2002 683.00 3134AITEO 6.8300/004/16/2002 DD 04/161 16-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 62,775.31 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 16-Apr-2002 3,179.15 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 16-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN OTRO06 19-Apr-2002 2,381.46 17120QE80 FLTG RT 09/08/2002 DD 04/081 19-Apr-2002 0.00 rr 19-Apr-2002 0.00 07-Map2002 13:47:20 Executive W&kknch' Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2002 -30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,652.45 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 22-Apr-2002 3,291.20 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12101/9 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 22-Apr-2002 0,00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,760.32 GNMA 11 POOL N080088M 22-Apr-2002 5,016.21 36225CC20 7.375%06/20/2027 DO 06/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 22-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 196,354.45 GNMA 11 POOL 4080408X 22-Apr-2002 26,267.95 36225CN28 6.500%05/202030 DD 05/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 22-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,585.11 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF SER 162 22-Apr-2002 13,585.11 3133T17A4 6.000%11/152023 DD 1110119 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 22-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,086.03 GNMA 11 POOL N0080395 22-Apr-2002 3,060.39 36225CNM4 VAR RT 04202030 DD 04/01/ 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 22-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,300,000.00 ONEOK INC NEW NT 24-Apr-2002 44,712.50 682680AJ2 FLTG RT 04/24/2002 DO 0424/ 24-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 24-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Apr-2002 10,933.33 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 25-Apr.2002 0.00 07-May-1002 13:47:20 Executive Workbench Q Mellon Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 50,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BKS CONS BUS 25-Apr-2002 1,573.75 3133MA2Z1 6.295%04/252002 DO 10/251 25-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-Apr-2002 6,712.50 02581SDR9 04252002 25-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 BECFON DICKINSON DISC 25-Apr-2002 8,691.67 07588SDRI 04252002 25-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 55,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 25-Apr-2002 378.74 313397VZI MAT 0425/2002 25-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 639.72 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 25-Apr-2002 2,466.38 398108AE4 7.430%06/012003 DO 0229/0 01-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 25-Apr-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 26-Apr-2002 3,412.50 5007MIDS9 0426/2002 26-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 26-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 62,378.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 26-Apr-2002 8,532.56 3133TCE95 VAR RT 0 911 52 0 3 2 DO 12NI/ 01-Mar-2002 0.00 IT 26-Apr-2002 0.00 07-May-2002 13:4710 Executive Workbench' Q Mellou Trust-Sample Report PAGE: 01 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-APR-2002-30-APR-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PDACO 1,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLDGS MTN 29-Apr-2002 5,207.22 79548EEES VAR RT 04/282003 DD 04281 2&Apr-2002 0.00 IT 29-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-P/MCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADl 30-Apr-2002 452.52 99000OP14 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 30-Apr-2002 0.00 CD 30-Apr-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 59,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 30-Apr-2002 81,361.00 313397WE7 MAT04/3012002 30-Apr-2002 0.00 IT 30-Apr-20W 0.00 F-annrim Wn-LAu�..L FAHRCOMMITTEE M"In,Date ToGSZDir. 05/08/02 5/27J02 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number t em Nu5(d) FAH umbe 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: THIRD QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2002 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the 2001-02 Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended March 31, 2002. SUMMARY Attached, in a separately bound document, is the District's Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended March 31, 2002. Contained within the Third Quarter Financial Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating & Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement Program, individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 70.85 percent, or$36.95 million of the 2001-02 net joint operating budget of$52.16 million has been expended. Net costs have increased $1.94 million, or 5.54 percent in comparison with the same period last year. The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2002 is $575.59 based on flows of 64.2 billion gallons, or 234.3 million gallons per day. This is $4.03, or 0.71 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$571.56. Capital improvement outlays through the third quarter were 36.14 percent, or $52,975,600 of the revised budget of$146,585,900. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) G W,�AYaMe figvl =Bo PpugeflgMiN50Nlam 151E)Y Qu WRw lRa{u a„,,,,. 1� Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. District's Third Quarter Financial Report for the period ended March 31, 2002. G 1wy.GtaapeMaLLUarO Ap[NaReprtsVW2 PnaN AgR.y�'UWUN 131EI.1NQ 1—n fl�-Ecc _� Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date TOBd.ofDir. 0 5 /0 8 /0 2 os/ZZ/o2 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHRo2-03 IS(.) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2002 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2002 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period January 1, 2002 through March 31, 2002. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies,"and the "Long-Term Operating Monies" are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) G:Wq.tlla�p a,BoaE ngenEa Repo QM W Acenm RepMWwvlan isle)InlsY lMna^o.aac a,.,,ee:arzave Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Y Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Service Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also attached are Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Characteristics Charts that depict the sector diversification and credit quality of the District's portfolios, as of December 31, 2001 and March 31, 2002. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a performance summary of the Districts portfolios as compared to their benchmarks for the period January 1 through March 31, 2002. Portfolio Perkwmance StanQuarter Ended March 3,,imary Liquitl Operating Monies Long-Term Operating Monies I%) Total Rate TOUI Rate of of Return Bendmat Return Benarnark°' 3 Months 0.53 0.44 0.43 -0.11 6 Months 1.27 1. 0.57 025 9 Montils 2.55 201 3.79 4.44 12 months 3.64 3.11 4.91 5.52 ince inception 30 Sept 95 5.34 1. 6.61 6.49 Market Value per PIMCO 31 Dec 01 S43.6M .ant Average Quality -AW 'AA* rent Yield 1%) 4.6 Estimated Yield to Maturity(%) 2.5 4.1 Quarterly OePosits(wMtlmvrals) .OM .OM Estimated Annual Incense 52.OM 16.5M (1) Benchmarks: • Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index • Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/GoA 1-5 Year Bond Index Market Recap PIMCO has reported that signs of a rebound in the U.S. economy and expectations of Federal Reserve tightening drove interest rates higher in the third quarter, depressing bond market returns. Treasury yields rose across all maturities, led by the two-year and the five-year, which climbed 70 and 50 basis points, respectively. Yields fell earlier in the quarter but reversed course sharply in late February and March after positive economic reports suggested that a cyclical turning point was at hand, including: e Industrial production rose in February for the second straight month; the increase signaled that battered manufactures were gearing up to meet demand after businesses slashed inventories at a record pace in the fourth quarter; c%"dW`e a u dAwud R• Vw a- Aae nep Wzu,em lw).e,wurmi'ewm.ox se.ud. arsa9a Page 2 • Consumer confidence rose in March in the larges monthly gain since the last recession ended in 1991; Housing starts climbed to their highest level in three years while growth in durable goods orders beat expectations; and • Government spending, particularly higher outlays on defense, homeland security and Medicare/Medicaid, provided stimulus. Bonds received no support from the Federal Reserve during the third quarter, as the central bank remained on the sidelines after easing 11 times last year. In a shift from its previous stance, the Fed laid the groundwork for rate increases by declaring that risks in the economy were no longer tilted toward weakness. Despite clear indications of a rebound, reduced capital spending continued to exert a drag on the economy during the first quarter. The ongoing corporate retrenchment, which also featured a reduction in equity buybacks, was designed to enhance free cash flow and rehabilitate credit quality that has been eroded by the borrowing and investment binge of the late 1990s. Credit agencies had become too reliant on short- term financing such as commercial paper. New corporate bond issuance surged during the first quarter as companies refinanced much of their commercial paper with longer- term notes. Bond yield cushions, such as mortgages and non-investment grade corporates, posted positive absolute returns during the quarter despite the headwind of rising rates. The following summarizes sector performance: • Mortgages outperformed Treasuries and corporates on a duration-adjusted basis. The sector benefited from relatively low volatility, high yields and demand from investors worried about corporate credit and accounting issues. • While absolute returns from investment grade corporates were negative amid rising rates, the sector still outpaced Treasuries despite concern about high debt levels, tighter lending standards and accounting problems. Below investment grade bonds fared better than high-grade issues due to a greater yield cushion and optimism about recovery. Portfolio Results The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of the District turned in a 0.43 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 54 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: • Emphasis on bonds that provide additional yield over Treasuries, such as mortgages and select corporate bonds, protected the portfolio amid a turn in the interest rate cycle; e:Mp mo gmm, WAW, ReWnn=Qg AgeAft Repo 100Vkm IRO ImeAmml Mng=.mc ae ,W:Ws Page 3 • Below-index duration was positive for returns as rates rose; V • A broader-than-index yield was positive as yields within the 1-3 year sector rose the most as markets began to anticipate Fed tightening; • A corporate underweight detracted from returns as yield premiums narrowed; • Real return bonds were positive fro performance given expectations for an uptick in inflation. The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of the District turned in a 0.53 percent return over the quarter, outperforming the three-month Treasury Bill Index by 9 basis points. This portfolio's performance was due in part to the following factors: • Above-benchmark duration paid off as very short term interest rates fell amid a weak economy; • Investment grade corporate holding added value as credit premiums narrowed amid optimism for an economic recovery; • High quality commercial paper and agency discount notes contributed to performance. Market Outlook PIMCO believes that the global downturn, centered in the manufacturing sector, is over. Coming out of a short and shallow recession, the recovery will be relatively moderate. The U.S. will lead the rebound, with average growth over the next several quarters of 3 to 3.5 percent, as a sharp inventory liquidation winds down and provides growth through the addition by the elimination of subtraction. Key elements of PIMCO's forecast include: • During the first half of 2002, the recent cycle of U.S. inventory liquidation, one of the steepest and fastest on record, will decelerate and then reserve course. Inventory restocking will boost demand in manufacturing worldwide; • In another example of addition by the elimination of subtraction, business investment will be less of a drag on growth. These are signs that the collapse in information technology spending, one of the major sources of weakness in the U.S. economy, is bottoming out; • Consumer demand will remain resilient, but not accelerate, as the recovery bolsters confidence in employment prospects and income stability; and • As growth resumes, the Federal Reserve will take back its post-September 11 emergency easing, raising federal funds rate to near three percent by the end of the year. c:eap,duraponeaMDeard Agenda ReeenaI2002 Board rgmma aepmawwrnam iwe).m.a•m rd Wgret oe Rea. MOM Page 4 However, growth will be slower in the second half of 2002. By that time, gains from the reversal of inventory liquidation will have largely worked their way through the economy and the follow through effects will be weaker. While the consumer and housing sectors show no signs of contracting, they will not provide an impetus for growth after the inventory impact fades. These sectors never followed manufacturing into recession, leaving little pent-up demand to propel growth. Investment will be restrained by excess capacity and companies' need to pay down debt to satisfy increasing demanding credit markets. The strong dollar will keep export growth in check. Inflation will remain well behaved in an environment of muted growth, discount-conscious consumers and low capacity utilization. With inflation benign and growth constrained, the bond market will not be biased in any direction. Ten-year Treasury yields will trade between 4.75 percent and 5.75 percent, but volatility within this range is likely because we are at monetary and cyclical turning points. In this setting, limited potential for capital gains from interest rate strategies calls for emphasis on high quality income-generating bonds. While mortgages are fully valued after their recent rally, they still offer a substantial yield cushion against price erosion with minimal credit exposure. High-grade corporates are more attractively priced than their below investment grade counterparts. However, credit concerns demand a selective approach to this sector by owning corporates with strong balance sheets and sound accounting practices that can withstand disappointments in the recovery. PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Long-Term Portfolio • Focus on high-quality securities with attractive yields, rather than interest rate strategies, to generate excess returns; • Target duration slightly above the benchmark to take advantage of opportunities for incremental yield that persist under the present steep yield curve environment; • Retain emphasis on mortgages which continue to offer attractive yield premiums and strong credit quality; • Look for opportunities to add high-grade corporate securities with strong balance sheets and sound accounting practices that will withstand economic uncertainty; • Limit real return holdings as modest inflation expectations reduce their appeal relative to nominal bonds; • Hold high-quality asset-backed securities to benefit from attractive yields and strong collateral protection. PIMCO's portfolio strategy for the Liquid Operating Portfolio • Target duration up to 0.25 year above the benchmark to capture additional yield and take exposure where markets are pricing in Fed tightening that is unlikely to occur; G:Yxp dWNgmla�Agent ReeIX UW28 WAgen6�50214 15(e)Anun0rcn,W9ft dM aersea:eagre Page 5 • Take advantage of compelling values and improving credit fundamentals in the corporate sector, emphasizing floating rate notes that add incremental yield and also �( add to the non-investment grade holdings; • Maintain holdings of high quality commercial paper and agency discount notes to add value and liquidity to the portfolio. Portfolio Market Values Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the following table, and in the attached bar chart. Liquid Long-Term Quay Operating Opending Ending Monies(SM) Monies(SM) 30 June 01 42.5 386.8 30 SWL 01 43.1 368.7 31 Dec.01 43 4 354.3 31 Met.02 43.6 355.8 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart 4. Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Characteristics Charts (2) 5. Historical Yield Curve Graph G.woseaemga taemm emwlxari emm nw�eepmsowmem ts(el.iavre.4 M,gr,4.aC: w W erzem Page 6 Prepared by Finance, 5/1/02,2:38 PM OCSD Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market) $450,000,000 $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 -- $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $0 31 Mar 01 30 Jun 01 30 Sep 01 31 Dec 01 31 Mar 02 0 Liquid Operating Monies In Long-Term Operating Monies G:lexcel.dta\fin12220�gegglFinance\investmgmtpmgram Portfolio Characteristics Orange County Sanitation District Liquid Operating Monies 120 �® 100 Quaill a 912/31/01 Total Market Value($MM) 43.4 43.6 "_ 0313V02 Quarterly Contributions($MM) 0.0 0.0 j 80 Estimated Annual Income($MM) 1.9 2.0 60 4 0 Estimated Duration(yrs)' 0.2 0.3 st 42 Estimated Yield to Maturity 1%) 2.2 2.5 a 40 2528 2320 Average Maturity(yrs) 0.3 0.3 20 6 10 Average Quality AA+ AA+ 0M I 00 0 0 D O 0 0 0 0 AlMi AAA M A Sebw, SPA SA 6 Bed.a 200 100 A1f➢l 6e11122 ■12/31/01 x 160 ■3/31/02 90 Maturl ■12131/01 > ; 60 23131102 70 5663 120 100100 60 60 . 2 30 40 `o a' 40 a" 20 19 20 16 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 10 701 5 0 0 0 0 0 ..-_.__.-_- _- 0 Gal MIg Corp Non US$ Emerging Other Netcashl Develop Markets M.'Ms, 0.3 ono 36. 5-g m, 9,12 me 1.5 yes 5+yrs > 12 r 0 0 Government Futures 0.0 0.0 8. 12 16 11 Interest Rate Swap Futures 0.0 0.0 7-8 7 9 Money Market Futures" 0.0 0.0 6.7 16 30 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0 5-6 8 2 Mortgage Backed" 0.0 0.0 c 5 53 46 Other' 0.0 0.0 Average Coupon 4.4 4.6 1 Measure of a bond portfolios(or a bond's)price sensitivity to changes in Interest rates. It Is a weighted maturity at present value of all pdndpal and Interest payments. 2 Includes quality rating of cash equivalents backing fouresifolward commitments. 3 Omer includes YankeefEu o bells,convertibles 4 preferred stocks;Net Cash y Money Mallets includes T bills,STIF,CP.Rks all CDs,lees amount to back boll futures,forwards and unsealed trades. 4 Mortgage-backed securities are categorized by weighted average life. 5 Includes Eurodollar.Fed Funds,and T-bill futures.Due to the three-month maturity of the Eurodollar futures conmcls,the general value has been divided by four. 5 Securities determined by PIMCO to have potentially less Stable duration characteristics,such as. I0 5 PO Strips,Support lass CMOs,and Inverse Floaters. 7 Category Induces securities which derive their value from underlying Interest rates,such as swaps,credit spreads,and fon-U.S,derivaUves, 3 Portfolio Characteristics Orange County Sanitation District Long Term Portfolio ®® ao is 70 91uIWt ■12/31/01 Total Market Value($Mod) 354.3 356.8 se 60 5454 03/31/02 Quarterly Contributions($MM) -15.0 0.0 > 50 Estimated Annual Income($MM) 16.8 16.6 m 40 Estimated Duration(yrs)' 2.2 2.1 f 30 19 2S21 Estimated Yield to Maturity 1%) 3.9 4.1 20 1 Average Maturity(yrs) 2.9 2.7 10 7 6 0 0 0 0 Average Quality AA+ AAA 0 o 0 0 In 0 p AIWI AAA AA A aNmv aAA M a 9aloa6 A1IP1 70 70 80 bra jnrr ■12131101 60 Maturity ■12131101 ■3/31/02 to 1113/31102 60 4514 j 50 3941 140 34S 40 2030 '.�30 iA 20 13t5 020 19 10 6 6 10e ._.� 0 0 O p 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 -- part Mtg Corp Non U53 Emerging Other Not Cash 0-1 yrs 1-3 yrs 3-5 the 5-0Oyre 10.20yrs 20+yrs Develop Merkel. Equly w 12 0 0 Government Futures 0.0 0.0 8- 12 1 1 Interest Rate Swap Futures OA 0.0 7-8 13 11 Money Market Futures' 0.0 0.0 6-7 40 39 Options Premiums 0.0 0.0 5-6 7 6 Mortgage Backed 0.0 0.0 <5 39 43 Others 0.0 0.0 Average Coupon 5.0 4.8 1 Measure or a band ponralb's(or a bond'st price sensitivity to changes In Interest rates. It is a weighted maturity,at present value of all principal and interest payments. 2 Omer Includes YankeelEuro bons,convenibles and municipal bolls;"Net Cash EqulvalentY'equal cash equivalents less amount used to back futures,forwards and unsealed Trades. 3 Includes Eurodollar,Fed Funds,and T bill futures.Due to the three-month maturity of Eurodollar futures conbacls,the nominal value has been divided by four. 4 SewdOes determined by PIMCO to have potentially leas stable duration characteristics,such as. 10 a PO Strips,Support-class CMOs,and Inverse Floaters. 5 Category Includes securities which derive their value from Underlying Interest rates,such as Swaps,credit spreads,and nW U.S.derivatives. 3 Prepared by Finance, 4/30/02, 4:30 PM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 6.50 6.25 6.00 5.75 5.50 -- -- -- -- —__- - __ - 5.25 — -- -- 5.00 — 4.75 -- --- q 4.50 -- - - GI 425 - 4.00 s 3.75 3.50 325 3.00 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.50 E t28-Sep-01 t31-Dec-01 t29-Mar-02 G:lexcel.dtaVin�2220%geggilFlnenceWlstorkelTREASURVyleldcume -. -- FAHR COMMITTEE lro,Dete rose.o olr. as�oaioz osizzi0z AGENDA REPORT Item""m' 1re Numb r FAHR02-44 ISM Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENEWAL OF BOILER& MACHINERY INSURANCE PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Renew the District's Boiler& Machinery Insurance Program for the period May 15, 2002 to May 15, 2003, with CNA Insurance Company, in an amount not to exceed $91,696. SUMMARY Staff recommends the annual renewal of Boiler& Machinery insurance coverage for the District covering the period from May 15, 2002 through May 15, 2003. The Boiler& Machinery insurance program provides comprehensive coverage for loss caused by machinery breakdown and explosion of steam boilers or other covered process equipment, including damage to the equipment itself and damage to other property caused by covered accident. Sufficient funds have been budgeted within the 2001-02 budget to cover premium costs. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District's FY 2002-03 Boiler& Machinery insurance program provides coverage ($100 million per occurrence/$100,000 deductible) for losses caused by covered machinery breakdown (e.g., motors, steam turbines, digesters, co-gen engines). Damages to the equipment, as well as damages to other property and improvements caused by the machinery breakdown, are covered by the boiler& machinery insurance. This program augments the District's all-risk property insurance that covers perils such as fire, flood, and earthquake. 0 ln,EbbgendMBoard Agenda Repp S2002 Board Agenda RepoM1A05091rem 15(0, dWr MaMinv Ins.de Reaaed, & .8 Page 1 I May 15, 2002— May 15, 2003 Renewal Cycle ; Driver Alliant Insurance Services, the District's Broker of Record, has reviewed the current state of the Boiler& Machinery insurance market and recommends that the District renew Boiler & Machinery insurance coverage with CNA Insurance Company, the District's current boiler& machinery insurance underwriter, for the period of May 15, 2002 through May 15, 2003. CNA Insurance Company is proposing a 21.8 percent increase over the prior year from $75,272 to $91,696. Driver Alliant believes, based on their review of the current marketplace deterioration and the substantial increase in industry rates, that CNA continues to offer the broadest coverage available at the most competitive cost. Conclusion CNA Insurance Company, with more than $2 billion in reserves, is rated "A"/FSC XV (Excellent) by A.M. Best Company (the insurance industry rating agency)for its overall ability to meet its obligations to policyholders. CNA is a strong insurance company and can offer Boiler& Machinery insurance with high coverage levels for operations as large and complex as the District. Additionally, they offer the most competitive pricing for the upcoming renewal period. Staff concurs with Driver's findings and recommendation. Sufficient funds are contained in the current budget to cover premium costs ($91,696). ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Broker of Record Letter dated May 1, 2002. Mow G:by-0NIaOeMe\Boatl ApenW ReN155VA0]EreN ABenAa RepaM1flO`ANlem 15111.B"iler MaUimy Ine Eoc RMwU:arzalse Page 2 driver.alli3nt INSURANCE SERVICES California LicY 0036661 INTEGRATED INSURANCE & FINANCIAL SERVICES May 1,2002 Michael White CPA,Controller - Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Re: Boiler and Machinery Dear Mike, We are pleased to enclose our May 15, 2002 Boiler and Machinery Insurance proposal for your review and consideration. Please note that CNA agreed to offer renewal coverage at a 20% rate increase in exchange for our not re-marketing the program to alternative insurers. Given the state of general marketplace deterioration and the fact that we have seen substantially higher rate increases,we judiciously accepted CNA's offer. CNA continues to afford the broadest coverage available, such as earthquake resultant damage (offered by no other insurer), at rates which we believe to be the most competitive in the marketplace. Accordingly, we recommend placement of coverage through CNA and will await your authorization. Sincerely, DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES,INC. Don McLean Senior Vice President Encl. c.ni.1.1.,vre+,�:a—,:,,.w.,;,.-,,om"",.w" i, .,. Driver Alllant Insurance Services,Inc. me each,, A9265rs 511 , P.O,Bm 4941 MarAiSM1ur Blvtl.,Ste. a300.(9 Newpotl 271 , GA 92a5672511 • P.O.enx 645 r Newport Beach.CA 928586950 Phone(999)]56 o2T1 • Fax(909)T562T13 www.tlhverallianl cram Tiriver*alllant INSURANCE SERVICES California Llc# OC36861 INTEGRATED INSURANCE B FINANCIAL SERVICES PUBLIC ENTITY PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGRAM(PEPIP) BOILER&MACHINERY PREMIUM INDICATION NAMED INSURED: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT POLICY TERM: May 15,2002 to May 15,2003 INSURANCE CARRIER: CNA Insurance Company *BEST'S GUIDE RATING: A(pooled),Excellent;Financial Size Category 15; Greater than$2,000,000,000 *STANDARD AND POOR'S A-; Strong Financial Security RATING: CALIFORNIA STATUS: Admitted COVERAGE: Comprehensive Coverage including Production Machinery, Public Utility Equipment, Digestors, Business Interruption, Extra Expense and Bond Revenue Payments, Loss Adjustment Agreement, Defense Outside Limits, Errors in Description, Earthquake Resultant Damage, Ammonia Contamination, Water Damage, Hazardous Substance Clean-up, Expediting Expense, Consequential Damage, Electronic computer or Electronic data processing equipment LIMITS: $100,000,000 Combined Limit- Property Damage & Business Interruption/Extra Expense (including Bond Revenue Interest Payments for locations where the income is reported) SUBLIMITS: EXPEDITING EXPENSE $10,000,000 AAzARDOUS SUBSTANCE $ 1,000,000 AMMONIA CONTAMINATION $10,000,000 WATER DAMAGE $10,000,000 Consequential Damage $10,000,000 *See Page 4 for addUional information Driver Alliant Insurance Services,Inc. uu Beach, Group P.O.Box 4041 MacArthur BNtl..Ste. a300.(9 Nexpon aeeoh,CA(949)756-2 • P.O.Box echo.Nawpotl Beach.CA 92658saso Phone(909)756a271 • Fax 1949)ieed]fl vm,vtlriveralllant.com PUBLIC ENTITY PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGRAM(PEPIP) ! BOILER&MACHINERY PREMIUM INDICATION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SUBLIMITS: (continued) DEMOLITION COST AND $ 1,000,000 INCREASED COST OF CONSTRUCTION ERRORS& Omissions $ 10,000,000 BUILDING ORDINANCE COVERAGES $ 1,000,000 SERVICE INTERRUPTION $10,000,000 EARTHQUAKE RESULTANT DAMAGE $ 2,000,000 each incident $ 2,000,000 each member $ 2,000,000 aggregate Coverage applies only to locations covered for Earthquake. ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING MEDIA $ 2,000,000 LOCATIONS: Omnibus Location Wording NEWLY ACQUIRED LOCATIONS: Must be reported to carrier within 365 Days VALUATION: Repair or Replacement except Actual Loss sustained for all Time Element coverages NOTICE OF CANCELLATION: 60 days except 10 days for non-payment of premium EXCLUSIONS: a Nuclear Hazard (INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO:) a War and Military Action a Fire or explosion outside the object that occurs at the same time as the accident a Water(fire extinguishing) a Lightning(fire extinguishing) a Flood a Testing a Lack of power,light,heat, steam or refrigeration a A delay in or interruption of any business activity 2 G UM'n��:W ALauA:an'Ca Smewfuuf .ry:g51L 1�!\IMyvnl A.e PUBLIC ENTITY PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGRAM(PEPIP) BOILER&MACHINERY PREMIUM INDICATION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT EXCLUSIONS: (continued) • Explosion,except for steam or centrifugal explosion • Freeze or Wind • Explosion of gas or unconsumed fuel from furnace of the boiler • Electronic Date Recognition Clause(Y2K) • Bonus and penalties of a Power Sales Agreement Exclusion OBJECTS EXCLUDED: . Insulating or refractory material • Non metallic vessel unless meets ASME standards • Catalyst • Buried vessel or piping • Furnace,oven,stove, incinerator,pot kiln • Structure,cabinet or compartment containing the object • Vehicle,aircraft, self-propelled equipment or floating vessel • Elevator escalator,crane,hoist, ladle or bucket, power shovel,dragline,escalator scale or conveyor but not excluding any boiler, fired vessel,unfired vessel normally subject to vacuum or internal pressure other than the weight of contents • Object manufactured by you for sale • Machine or apparatus used for research, diagnosis, medication,surgical,therapeutic,dental or pathological purposes Felt,wire screen,die, extrusion plate and swing hammer PROPERTY DAMAGE DEDUCTIBLES: $100,000 Motors,Engines and Turbines over 50Qhp $100,000 Digesters and Reactors $25,000 All other insured objects ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING MEDIA: $5,000 CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE: $5,000 TUvIE ELEMENT DEDUCTIBLES: 24 Hours on All Objects except: 5X 100%Daily value All objects over 750 HP, 10,000 KW/KVA/AMPS or 10,000 Sq. Ft. heating surface; 5X 100%Daily value All objects at Wastewater Treatment Facilities,Utilities; 30 days for Bond Revenue interest payments 3 i, u PUBLIC ENTITY PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGRAM(PEPH') BOH,ER&MACHINERY PREMIUM INDICATION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT TOTAL INSURED VALUES: $1,522,696,601 ANNUAL PREMIUM: $ 91,696 BROKER: Driver Alliant Insurance Services P. O. Box 6450 Newport Beach,CA 92660-6450 W. Jeffrey Mann Vice President Donald H.McLean Senior Vice President Michel Maciel Account Administrator REFER TO YOUR POLICY FOR A COMPLETE LISTING OF TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS THIS IS JUST A PROPOSAL PLEASE SEE THE POLICY FOR COMPLETE TERMS CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS -Analyzing insurers'Duero!!performance and fine nciat strength is a task that requires specialized skills and in- depth technical understanding ofall aspects of insuraae company finances and operations. Insurance brokerages such as Driver Alliam Insurance Services,Inc. typically rely upon rating Dgencies jor this type of make(analysis. Both AM Best and Standard and Poor have been industry leaders in this aia for many decades, uldning a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis of the byowau ion available in formulating their ratings. A.M. Best has an extensive database of nearly 6,000 Life/Heafth, Property Casualty and International companies. You can visit them at w ..ambestmm For additional information regarding insurer financial strength ratings visit Standard and Poor uebsite at svwsv standardandaoors.com To learn more about companies doing business in Cdffornia, visit the California Department of Insurance svebsite at svww.imurance.c¢¢ov 4 4JPIm:)uN NnuMO,ary Cu SeiipYovi:n:U[5:1 Rkal P,ryw�dJ�. FAHRCOMMITTEE meeeng"a"' 7o Bd.orDir. 05/08/02 o512y02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR0245 15(a) orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager SUBJECT: Additions to Safety Policies as Authorized by Resolution No. OCSD 02-5 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve attached Safety Policies as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5 and SAFETY-POL-101, Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. SUMMARY Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 3203, and California Labor Code, Section 6401.7, require employers to establish, implement and maintain an effective injury prevention program. The District's written Injury and Illness Prevention (IIP) Program was approved in February 2002. The IIP Program provides that written safety and health policies, procedures and programs will be developed and maintained to ensure compliance with applicable Federal OSHA and Cal-OSHA requirements and to carryout effective accident prevention in the workplace, thereby reducing injury incidence rates. To ensure that the IIP Program is effectively implemented, various Safety Policies are being developed to address targeted compliance areas. The compliance areas identified for program development and policy implementation at this time are indicated in the following policies: • SAFETY-POL-104 Confined Spaces • SAFETY-POL-106 Hearing Conservation Program PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Written safety compliance programs are detailed in specific Safety Policies, Procedures or Programs. The policies being submitted for approval are the following: SAFETY-POL-104 Confined Spaces This policy ensures that confined spaces are properly identified and marked. It also establishes the procedures and necessary training required for entering a confined space. This policy provides definitions for confined spaces and associated factors, identifies hazards and lays out requirements for related work activities. It applies to all district employees, contractors, visitors, rescue personnel or regulatory personnel who may enter confined spaces for any reason. SAFETY-POL-106 Hearing Conservation Program This policy is designed to prevent employees from developing noise induced hearing loss on the job. This is accomplished through equipment selection, noise exposure assessments, training, and annual hearing tests. It includes requirements for designating areas where hearing protection is required and the selection, use and care for hearing protection devices. ALTERNATIVES Not Applicable CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 - SAFETY-POL-104 Confined Spaces Attachment 2 - SAFETY-POL-106 Hearing Conservation Program G`W Uiek�Np .��BaiN�AeWts`OSONiem 19101.UINYP Maea.Ox aeoW Oa 2 Page 2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Safety and Health Division SAFETY-POL-104 Confined Spaces APPROVALS Approved by: Date: Director of Human Resources Approved by: Date: Manager,Human Resources Approved by: Date: Safety supervisor PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval 0 This document is controlled when viewed in the NTGLOBAL/Safety directory. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the NTGLOBAUSafety directory to ensure that they have the latest version. Confined Spaces SAFETY-0OL-104 Contents 1. Purpose............................................................................................... 3 2. Definitions........................................................................................... 3 3. Requirements ..................................................................................... 5 4. References.......................................................................................... 7 5. Attachments ....................................................................................... 7 Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 2 of 7 9:\wp.dtalagendaHahrlfah200212002 agenda reports102-45.safety policies 104 attachmenl.doc Orange County Sanitation District Number: SAFETY-POL-104 Revision Number: 0 Confined Spaces Date: Approved by: Lisa Tomko 1. Purpose This Policy has been developed to ensure that confined spaces are properly identified and marked. This policy also establishes the procedures and necessary training required for entering a confined space. This policy applies to all district employees, contractors, visitors , rescue personnel or regulatory personnel who may enter confined spaces for any reason 2. Definitions Confined Space A space that: (1) Is large enough and so configured that an employee can bodily enter and perform assigned work; and (2) Has limited or restricted means for entry or exit (far example, tanks, vessels, silos, storage bins, hoppers, vaults, and pits are spaces that may have limited means of entry.); and (3) Is not designed for continuous employee occupancy. Emergency Any occurrence (including any failure of hazard control or monitoring equipment)or event internal or external to the permit space that could endanger entrants. Entry The action by which a person passes through an opening into a permit-required confined space. Entry includes ensuing work activities in that space and is considered to have occurred as soon as any part of the entrants body breaks the plane of an opening into the space. Hazardous An atmosphere that may expose employees to the risk of death, Atmosphere incapacitation, impairment of ability to self-rescue (that is, escape unaided from a permit space), injury, or acute illness from one or more of the following causes: (1) Flammable gas, vapor, or mist in excess of 10 percent of its Rev.A Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 3 of 7 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahf200212002 agenda reportsk0245.safety policies 104 attachment.doc Confined Spaces SAFETY-POL-104 lower flammable limit (LFL); (2) Airborne combustible dust at a concentration that meets or exceeds its LFL; Note: This concentration may be approximated as a condition in which the dust obscures vision at a distance of 5 feet (1.52 M) or less. (3) Atmospheric oxygen concentration below 19.5 percent or above 23.5 percent; (4) Atmospheric concentration of any substance for which a dose is published in Group 14 for Radiation and Radioactivity or a permissible exposure limit is published in section 5155 for Airborne contaminants and which could result in employee exposure in excess of its dose or permissible exposure limit; Note: An atmospheric concentration of any substance that is not capable of causing death, incapacitation, impairment of ability to self-rescue, injury, or acute illness due to its health effects is not covered by this provision. (5) Any other atmospheric condition that is immediately dangerous to life or health. Immediately Means any condition that poses an immediate or delayed threat dangerous to life to life or that would cause irreversible adverse health effects or or health (IDLH) that would interfere with an individual's ability to escape unaided from a permit space. Non-permit Means a confined space that does not contain or, with respect to confined space atmospheric hazards, have the potential to contain any hazard capable of causing death or serious physical harm. Oxygen An atmosphere containing less than 19.5 percent oxygen by Deficiency volume. Oxygen An atmosphere containing more than 23.5 percent oxygen by Enrichment volume. Permit Required A confined space that has one or more of the following Confined Space characteristics: (1) Contains or has a potential to contain a hazardous atmosphere; Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 4 of 7 9:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-45.safety policies 104 attachment.doc Confined Spaces SAFETY-POL-104 (2) Contains a material that has the potential for engulfing an entrant; (3) Has an internal configuration such that an entrant could be trapped or asphyxiated by inwardly converging walls or by a floor which slopes downward and tapers to a smaller cross- section; or (4) Contains any other recognized serious safety or health hazard. Testing The process by which the hazards that may confront entrants of a permit space are identified and evaluated. Testing includes specifying the tests that are to be performed in the permit space. Note: Testing enables employers both to devise and implement adequate control measures for the protection of authorized entrants and to determine if acceptable entry conditions are present immediately prior to, and during, entry. 3. Requirements The speck requirements of this Confined Space Entry Policy are found in SAFETY-SP-104 Confined Space Entry Programs. At a minimum, this program must include the following: 1. A method to evaluate the workplace to determine the location of any confined spaces. 2. A method to evaluate the identified confined spaces as permit-required confined spaces. 3. A method to communicate to exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces. 4. A written Confined Space Entry Program. 5. Methods to prevent an accidental fall through the opening and that will protect each employee working in the space from foreign objects entering the space when entrance covers are removed. Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 5 of 7 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr21102\2002 agenda reports\02a15.safety policies 104 attachment.doc Confined Spaces SAFETY-POL-104 6. Methods to test the internal atmosphere of the space before entrance into the space is allowed. The atmosphere shall be tested, with a calibrated direct-reading instrument, for the following conditions in the order given: A. Oxygen content, B. Flammable gases and vapors, and C. Potential toxic air contaminants. 7. Requirements for the use of continuous forced air ventilation. 8. Requirements for the periodic testing of the atmosphere with in the space as necessary to ensure that the continuous forced air ventilation is preventing the accumulation of a hazardous atmosphere. 9. Methods to verify that the space is safe for entry and that the pre-entry measures as described in SAFETY-SP 104 have been taken, through a written certification that contains A. The date, B. The location of the space, and C. The signature of the person providing the certification. 10. Procedures to reclassify a non-permit required confined space to a permit required confined space when there are changes in the use or configuration of the non-permit confined space that might increase the hazards to entrants. 11. Procedures to re-classify a space that was originally classified as a permit-required confined space to a non- permit confined space. 12. Methods to inform employees of another employer (contractor) whose work involves permit space entry. 13. Procedures to ensure contractors are verifying that the space is safe for entry and that the pre-entry measures required by Cal-OSHA regulations have been followed. 14. Procedures to ensure atmospheric monitors used for Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 6 of 7 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahnfah2002\2002 agenda reports\02A5.safety policies 104 attachment.doc Confined Spaces SAFETY-POL-104 confined space entry are calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4. References SAFETY-SOP-104.1 Confined Space Entry in the Collection System SAFETY-SP-104 Confined Space Entry Programs California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5156 (Confined Spaces) Scope, Application and Definitions California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5157 Permit Required Confined Spaces California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5158 Other Confined Space Operations. 5. Attachments None Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 7 of 7 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-45.safety policies 104 adachment.doc ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Safety and Health Division SAFETY-POL-106 Hearing Conservation Program APPROVALS Approved by: Date: Director of Human Resources Approved by: Date: Manager,Human Resources Approved by: Date: Safety SupeMsor PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval 0 This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and Health public folder to ensure that they have the latest version. Hearing Conservation Program SAFETY-POL-106 Contents 1. Purpose............................................................................................... 3 2. Definitions........................................................................................... 3 3. Requirements ..................................................................................... 4 3.1 Exposure Monitoring and Assessments...................................................5 3.1.1 Initial Exposure Assessments.............................................................5 3.1.2 Periodic Exposure Assessments.........................................................5 3.2 Permitted Noise Levels............................................................................5 3.3 Audiometric Testing Program...................................................................6 3.4 Hearing Protection ...................................................................................6 3.4.1 Hearing Protector Availability..............................................................7 3.4.2 Hearing Protector Selection and Use..................................................7 3.5 Employee Training...................................................................................7 3.6 Equipment Purchases..............................................................................8 3.7 Program Administration............................................................................8 3.7.1 Exposure Assessments Recordkeeping..............................................8 3.7.2 Audiogram Recordkeeping..................................................................9 3.7.3 Program Review and Assessment......................................................9 4. References........................................................................................ 10 5. Attachments ..................................................................................... 11 Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 2 of 11 g:\wp.dta%agendaXfahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-45.safety policies 106 attachment.doc Number: SAFETY-POL-106 Orange County Sanitation District Revision Number: 0 Hearing Conservation Program Date: May 2002 Approved by: Lisa Tomko 1 . Purpose The purpose of this Hearing Conservation Program is to prevent employees from developing noise induced hearing loss on the job. This is done through equipment selection, exposure assessments, training, and annual hearing tests. 2. Definitions Action Level An 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels measured on the A-scale, slow response, or equivalently, a dose of 50 percent. Audiogram A chart, graph, or table resulting from an audiometric test showing an individual's hearing threshold levels as a function of frequency. Audiologist A professional specializing in the study and rehabilitation of hearing, who is certified by the American Speech, Hearing and Language Association or licensed by a state board of examiners. Baseline The audiogram against which future audiograms are compared. Audiogram Continuous Noise with negligibly small fluctuations of level within the period Noise of observation. Criterion Sound A sound level of 90 decibels. Level Decibel (dB) The unit of measure of sound level. dBA (decibels-A- A unit of measurement of sound level corrected to the A- Weighted) weighted scale, as defined in ANSI S1.4-1971, using a reference level of 20 micropascals (0.00002 Newton per square meter.) Hertz(Hz) A unit of measurement of frequency, numerically equal to cycles Rev.A Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 3/30/01 3 of 11 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-45.safety policies 106 aftachment.doc Hearing Conservation Program SAFETY•POL-106 persecond. High Noise Area An area where equipment operates in excess of 85 dBA. Impulsive Noise Noise that is characterized by a sharp rise and rapid decay in sound levels and is less than 1 second in duration. Intermittent Noise levels that are interrupted by intervals of relatively low Noise sound levels. Medical A disorder or disease affecting the ear, which should be treated Pathology by a physician. Noise Dosimeter An instrument used to measure sound level over the course of a work shift. Otolaryngologist A physician specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the ears, nose and throat. Representative Measurements of an employee's noise dose or 8-hour time Exposure weighted average sound level that Safety deems to be - representative of exposures of other employees in the workplace. Sound Level A measurement derived from the mathematical derivation of the measured A-weighted average sound level when compared to a standard reference pressure of 20 micropascals. Sound Level An instrument used for the measurement of sound level. Meter Standard A change in hearing threshold relative to the baseline audiogram Threshold Shift of an average of 10 dB or more at 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz in (STS) either ear. 3. Requirements The district shall implement this Hearing Conservation Program when it is determined that employee exposure to noise exceeds an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 85 dBA. The Hearing Conservation Program shall include the elements listed below. Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 4 of 11 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-45.safety policies 106 attachment.doc Hearing Conservation Program sAFETY-POL-106 3.1 Exposure Monitoring and Assessments The Safety and Health Division shall conduct noise surveys and dosimetry to determine areas where hearing protection is required and determine which employee job classifications must be included in this hearing conservation program. 3.1.1 Initial Exposure Assessments Initial and periodic exposure assessments for noise shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-106.1 Exposure Monitoring and Assessments for Noise Exposures 1. A noise survey shall be conducted in all areas of the worksite and noisy tasks to determine if noise exposures may exceed 85dBA. 2. In areas where noise exposures exceed 85 dBA, a noise dosimeter shall be used to determine if employees noise exposure exceed an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA. 3. If employees move around frequently, Safety shall develop a task base strategy to accurately determine noise exposures. 3.1.2 Periodic Exposure Assessments 1. If an employee's noise exposure exceeds an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA, monitoring shall be repeated every 2 years. 2. Monitoring shall be repeated within 3 months when there is a change in equipment, production processes or maintenance routines. 3. Monitoring may be repeated at shorter frequencies if employees are developing significant threshold shifts. 3.2 Permitted Noise Levels Sound levels in the district shall conform to the limits below. 1. Employees shall not work in environments that expose them to noise levels exceeding 85 dBA based on an 8-hour TWA, unless they are wearing hearing protection that reduces the Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 5 of 11 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahhfahr2002\2002 agenda repartsNO2-45.safety policies 106 attachment.doc Hearing Conservation Program SAFETY-POL-106 noise level to at least 85 dBA. 2. Employees shall not remain in areas exceeding 90 dBA for periods of longer than 12 minutes without wearing hearing protection that reduces the noise level to at least 85 dBA. 3. Employees shall not be exposed to continuous, intermittent or impulsive noise exceeding 140 dB. 3.3 Audiometric Testing Program Safety shall contract with an audiologist to conduct the audiometric testing program. Speck requirements for the audiometric testing program may be found in SAFETY-SOP- 106.2 Audiometric Testing Requirements. 1. All audiometric tests shall be provided at no cost to the employee. 2. Audiometric tests shall be performed by or overseen by an audiologist or physician. 3. The district shall establish a valid baseline audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA. 4. At least annually, after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the district shall provide a new audiogram for each employee subject to the hearing conservation program. 5. Audiograms shall be evaluated in accordance with SAFETY- SOP-403.5, Medical Surveillance Examinations for Hearing Conservation. 3.4 Hearing Protection A personal hearing protection device is any device designed to reduce the level of sound reaching the eardrum. Earmuffs and earplugs are the main types of hearing protectors. Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Dale May 2002 6 of 11 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah200212002 agenda reports\02-45.safety policies 106 attachment.doc Hearing Conservation Program SAFETY-POL-108 3.4.1 Hearing Protector Availability 1. Hearing protection is available from the warehouse at no cost to the employee. 2. Areas posted as "HIGH NOISE", or HEARING PROTECTION REQQUIRED" may also have hearing protection available for use at the entrance to the high noise areas. 3.4.2 Hearing Protector Selection and Use 1. Hearing protectors shall be selected based on the following: A. Sound level B. Employee acceptance C. Task being performed and interference with other PPE. 2. Hearing protectors shall be used in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-102.5 PPE Use, Appendices, A. Hearing Protection-Plugs Use; B. Hearing Protection-Ear Muffs; C, Hearing Protection-Hard Hat Mounted earmuffs and D, Hearing Protection-Sound Bands. 3. Hearing protectors shall be maintained and cared for in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-102.6 PPE Care and Maintenance, Appendices A Hearing Protection-Plugs Inspection, Care and Maintenance; B, Hearing Protection- Ear Muffs, Inspection, Care and Maintenance, C, Hearing Protection-Hard Hat Mounted Ear Muffs , Inspection, Care and Maintenance and D, Hearing Protection-Sound Bands , Inspection, Care and Maintenance 4. Employees are responsible to ensure they properly use and maintain their hearing protection. 3.5 Employee Training The success of this Hearing Conservation Program depends largely on effective employee education regarding all aspects of the program. The primary focus of the training must be on the workers and they must be informed about the reasons for and Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 7 of 11 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02A5.safety policies 106 attachment.doc Hearing Conservation Program SAFETY-POL406 the requirements of the Hearing Conservation Program. 1. Training shall be conducted and content shall be in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-106. 5 Employee Training, 2. Training shall be conducted at least annually. 3.6 Equipment Purchases In an effort to reduce equipment-related noise, attempts shall be made to purchase equipment that meets the following requirements for noise: 1. Equipment shall produce a noise level of less than 85 dBA at the operator's workstation or a distance of 5 feet from the equipment. A. Equipment that is not able to meet the above requirements shall be enclosed, dampened or some other form of control used to minimize the noise level. 3.7 Program Administration The Hearing Conservation Program shall be managed and administered by the Safety and Health Division. 3.7.1 Exposure Assessments Recordkeeping 1. The SAFETY DIVISION shall maintain an accurate record of all employee noise exposure measurements for an employee's length of employment. 2. The exposure assessment shall include: A. Employee name B. Employee job description C. Employee job task/duties D. Instrument calibration data E. Date and time of survey F. Exposure measurements Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 8 of 11 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\02-45.safety policies 106 attachment.doc Hearing Conservation Program SAFETY-POL-106 G. Other information pertinent to the survey 3.7.2 Audiogram Recordkeeping 1. The SAFETY DIVISION shall maintain audiometric test records for an employee's length of employment. 2. The exposure assessment shall include: A. Employee name B. Employee job description C. Date of audiogram D. The examiner's name E. The date of the last acoustic or exhaustive calibration of the audiometer F. The employee's most recent noise exposure assessment 3.7.3 Program Review and Assessment This Hearing Conservation Program shall be evaluated annually to ensure that it is effective in providing adequate protection against harmful noise. The following steps shall be followed to conduct this program review: 1. The Safety Division shall determine if regulations or national consensus standards have changed since the last annual program review. A. Review Federal OSHA Standards, interpretations and documents. B. Review consensus standards. 2. The Safety Division shall review the current Hearing Conservation Program, proposed changes to State and Federal Regulations and national consensus standards and recommend changes to the district's Hearing Conservation Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 9 of 11 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02-45.safety policies 106 adachment.doc Hearing Conservation Program SAFETY-POL406 Program as required. 3. The Safety Division shall have 30 days to make minor program changes, and 60 days in the case of major program revisions. 4. Hearing Conservation Program reviews shall start by November 15 of each year. 4. References SAFETY-POL-102, Personal Protective Equipment SAFETY-POL-102.3, Obtaining PPE. SAFETY-SOP-102.5 PPE Use SAFETY-SOP-102.6 PPE Care and Maintenance SAFETY-SOP-106.1 Exposure Monitoring and Assessments for Noise Exposures SAFETY-SOP-106.2 Audiometric Testing Requirements SAFETY-SOP-106.3 Medical Referrals and Job Restrictions SAFETY-SOP-106.4 Hearing Protection Selection SAFETY-SOP-106.5 Employee Training SAFETY-SOP-106.6 Program Administration and Recordkeeping SAFETY-POL-403, Medical Examinations SAFETY-SOP-403.5, Medical Surveillance Examinations for Hearing Conservation. Tide 8, California Code of Regulations Article 105, Control of Noise Exposure. Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1910.95 Occupational Noise Exposure Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 10 of 11 g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahr\fah2002\2002 agenda reports\0246.safety policies 106 attachment.doc Hearing Conservation Program SAFETY-POL-106 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) S1.4-1971 Weighting Networks for Acoustical Measurements, Design Response of 5. Attachments None Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date May 2002 11 of i t g:\wp.dta\agenda\fahAfahr2002\2002 agenda reports\02AS.safety policies 106 attachment.doc FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Dale Toetl.or Dir. g5/Da/02 05/22/O2 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number It Number FAHIlan umE 15 h Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: Jan Collins, Senior Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-09, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for: 1. Change the title and pay range of current Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($4,469 - $6,324)to Principal Contracts Administrator at pay range E12 ($5,708 - $8,076). 2. Create Employee Development Supervisor classification at pay range E11 ($5,430 - $7,683). SUMMARY From time to time, adjustments need to be made to classification structures. As new duties and responsibilities are identified as critical to the mission of the organization, classifications must be modified or added. Staff is proposing two adjustments that need to be made to the classification structure outside of the Classification and Compensation study due to Immediate organization needs. 1. An Engineering Contracts Administrator classification at pay range E7 ($4,469 - $6,324) was added to the classification structure in November 2000. As part of the district-wide Classification and Compensation study, Johnson & Associates has recommended that this classification be retitled to Principal Contracts Administrator and have a pay range maximum of$8,222. The classification modification and assigned pay grade were approved by the FAHR committee on 01/09/02 and 02/13/02. The District has tried unsuccessfully to recruit for this position for over one year. At this time, we are requesting that the FAHR committee approve the modification of the title and upgrade the compensation for this classification prior to the full implementation of the study due to the critical need of the position. Therefore, staff recommends that the Engineering Contracts Administrator classification be retitled to Principal Contracts Administrator and upgraded to pay grade El ($5,708 - $8,076) which is the pay range in the current structure that has a range maximum closest to the proposed range maximum in the recommended structure. Please see the attached classification description, Attachment 2. i� 2. In FY98/99, a decision was made to combine the HR Administration Division with the Training Division. One result of this change has been a de-emphasis on the training function within the District; this is not due to a change in the training philosophy but has happened inadvertently due to the necessity for resources on the HR Administration side. There have been a number of politically-driven initiatives such as disinfection, treatment process changes and the beach study that have increased and will continue to increase the need for technical training at the District. In order to successfully manage this expanded role of Employee Development, we are requesting that the former Training Supervisor classification be changed to an Employee Development Supervisor and reinstated at pay range Ell ($5,430- $7,683), the same range as the Human Resources Supervisor and the Safety Supervisor classifications. Please see attached classification description, Attachment 3. Human Resources Policy C10.10, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule, has been updated to reflect the proposed modifications and is attached for review and acceptance as Attachment 4. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY FTEs have been budgeted for these two positions which are currently vacant. Salary costs for the remaining two months of FY01/02 are estimated at$26,900. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Classification and compensation program remains unchanged until meet and confer process is completed with SPMT bargaining units. CEQA FINDINGS N/A G\vq.EratiAenEo\BmrE Apen6a RepasQPo2 Boar)ApenEe RepartSNWZrllem 15� )UaaeAcaLans Slrutlme Mc Rer+seE. BaBm, Page 2 .4 ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. OCSD 02- 2. Principal Contracts Administrator classification specification. 3. Employee Development Supervisor classification specification. 4. Human Resources Policy and Procedure C10.10, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule. o w.n.euvaew.�aa..re,yenae nmuiszaoz eoeb name.Aegmeweoaiwn,s�nl.aewnunwu suwun,.em ne.,.m: eawn, Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02- AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That Exhibit'A'of Resolution No. OCSO 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. C10.10, Classification and Compensation set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: That all other terms and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be made by Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 22, 2002. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary GYgebreenWbme Aq, wpeatle0]Bare Ap Repwb'OSpNMm,sIM.�euaan BOumrt4x wane. B 1 Page 4 Job Code: 1812 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ELSA Status: CLASS SPECIFICATION Bargaining Unit: Professional 11 Effective Date: CLASS TITLE: PRINCIPAL CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR PAGE: 1 Class specifications are intended to present a descriptive list of the range of duties performed by employees in the class. Specifications are not intended to reflect all duties performed within the job. SUMMARY DESCRD'TION Under general direction,performs and oversees the most complex contracts involved in the procurement of engineering services including professional design services,maintenance contracts,and construction services in coordination with District staff,legal counsel,and outside contractors;participates in the development and fulfillment of contract requirements in accordance with District's policies and local, state and federal regulations;and provides consistency and oversight in contracts and contractual relationships. DISTINGUISHING CRARACTERISTICS This is the advanced journey level class in the professional Contracts Administrator series. Positions at this level are distinguished from other classes within the series by the level of responsibility assumed and the complexity of duties assigned. Employees perform the most difficult and responsible types of duties assigned to classes within this series requiring advanced knowledge of the concepts, practices, and procedures of contact administration including those related to engineering contracts. Employees at this level are required to be fully trained in all procedures related to assigned area of responsibility and my oversee and lead lower level contract administration staff. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES The following duties are typical for this classification. Incumbents may not perform all of the listed duties and/or may be required to perform additional or different duties from those set forth below to address business needs and changing businesspractices. 1. Develop formal procedures and guidelines for all engineering related procurements; provide guidance and monitor the engineering contract administrative processes involved in the implementation of engineering and construction services. 2. Perform and oversee the procurement of engineering services including design services, maintenance contracts, and construction services; conduct solicitations and procurement of professional design services and construction services. 3. Identify all documents to be maintained in conjunction with the procurement and administration of engineering contracts; select appropriate contractual instruments and language for engineering procurements;establish required documentation systems for each project. 4. Oversee the bid process for assigned construction projects or contracts; conduct pre-bid conferences and mcetings; issue revisions, addenda, or announcements; open and evaluate bids; issue notice of awards and notices to proceed; address bid protests. 5. Serve as liaison between the engineering and procurement divisions and coordinate with District staff, legal counsel, and outside contractors to manage the business relationship of contract parties for engineering,public works,and other contracts as assigned;participate in the development and fulfillment of contract requirements in accordance with District's policies and local, state and federal regulations; ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Job Code: 1812 FLSA Status: , CLASS SPECIFICATION Bargaining Unit: Professional Effective Date: CLASS TITLE: PRINCIPAL CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR PAGE: 2 provide consistency and oversight in contracts and contractual relationships. 6. Review and/or prepare bid documents, contract stipulations, process specifications, liability and insurance requirements, bonds, and faithful performance warranties; assure conformity and compliance with District policies,procedures,and service provision expectations. 7. Coordinate, approve, and administer contract change orders, amendments, addendums, extensions, stop notices,releases,and closeout agreements to ensure that all contractual obligations have been met 8. Review progress payments to insure payments are processed in a timely manner and that value is received for any payments made. 9. Advise departments of contractual rights and obligations under approved terms and conditions; assume responsibility for interpretation of contract language;resolve disputes between parties. 10. Manage the contractual relationship including the conduct of parties, relationship with contractor, communications, business systems, authority for procedures, and duties of all parties; assume responsibility for handling any claims or disputes not resolved in the field. 11. Negotiate contracts with vendors; direct major contract purchases; interface with service providers to expedite timely completion of contract agreements. 12. Manage and track the flow of paperwork involved fur procurement and execution of engineering contracts; maintain comprehensive contractual records and periodically monitor progress of all goods and service agreements,from inception through completion,to enforce milestones,deliverables and post- contract warranties; conduct periodic internal audits to ensure that proper documentation and procedures have been maintained. 13. As assigned, lead and oversee the work of contract administration staff; assign and review work; train assigned employees in their area of work; ensure work quality and adherence to established policies and procedures. 14. Perform related duties as required. OUALMCATIONS The following generally describes the knowledge and ability required to enter the job and/or be learned within o short period of time in order to successfully perform the assigned dunes. Knowledee o8 Engineering design and construction practices and processes. Processes involved in the construction and design of wastewater treatment facilities. Principles and practices used in the development of contracts. Public contracting authority and responsibility. Principles and practices of contract administration. Principles and practices of project management and administration. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Job Code: 1812 FLSA Status: CLASS SPECIFICATION Bargaining Unit:Professional Effective Date: CLASS TITLE: PRINCIPAL CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR PAGE: 3 Principles and practices of contract law. Principles and practices of accounting. Legal language and terminology. Methods and techniques of negotiation. Office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and applicable software applications such as word processing,spreadsheets,and data basis. Principles of business letter writing and basic report preparation. Principles and practices of fiscal, statistical,and administrative research and report preparation. Pertinent federal, state, and local codes, laws, and regulations including contract law and Uniform Commercial Code. English usage,spelling,grammar and punctuation. Principles of lead supervision and training. Ability to: Interpret and apply applicable federal,state,and local laws,codes and regulations. Interpret and apply administrative and departmental policies and procedures. Negotiate contracts and contract changes. Resolve contractual disputes. Work cooperatively with other departments,district officials,and outside agencies including engineers. Prepare and compose contracts,change orders,bid documents,and specifications. Effectively represent the District to outside individuals and agencies to accomplish the goals and objectives of the unit. Design and implement administrative communication and reporting systems. Operate office equipment including computers and supporting word processing, spreadsheet, and database applications. Handle multiple complex procurements simultaneously. Provide work direction,coordination,and training to assigned staff. Plan and organize work to meet changing priorities and deadlines. Communicate clearly and concisely,both orally and in writing. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Education and Experience Guidelines - Any combination of education and experience that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: Education/Training: Equivalent to a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university with major course work in engineering, architecture, business, contract law, or related field. A Master's degree in business administration or management is desirable. Experience: Five years of increasingly responsible experience in the development and administration of a variety of contracts,including engineering contracts, at a level comparable to a Senior Contracts Administrator in the District. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Job Code: 1812 FLSA Status: it CLASS SPECIFICATION Bargaining Unit:Professional Effective Date: CLASS TITLE: PRINCIPAL CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR PAGE: 4 License or Certificate: Possession of certification in the Management of Business Contracts or comparable contracts administration program is desirable. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essentialjobfuncnons. Environment:Standard office setting. physical: Incumbents require sufficient physical ability to work in an office setting; stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; operate office equipment including use of a computer keyboard; push, pull, lift,and/or carry light amounts of weight. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction; vision sufficient to read computer screens and printed documents;and to operate assigned equipment. earin :Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Doe:January,2002 Johnson&Associates ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Job Code: FLSA Status: CLASS SPECQF'ICATION Bargaining Unit:Supervisory 11 Effective Date: CLASS TITLE: EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT SUPERVISOR PAGE: I Class spechcations are intended to present a descriptive list of the range of duties performed by employees in the class.Specifications are Me intended to reflect all duties performed within the job. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Under general direction, supervises, assigns,reviews,and participates in the work of staff responsible for developing and delivering employee development programs such as performance improvement, career and succession planning and training. Establishes links at organizational, group and individual levels for improved/increased effectiveness and efficiency through learning. Participates in the development, implementation and administration of programs, policies and procedures; ensures work quality and adherence to established policies and procedures; and performs the more technical and complex tasks relative to assigned area of responsibility. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES The following duties are typical for this classification. Incumbents may not perform all of the listed duties and/or may be required to perform additional or different dunes from those set forth below to address business needs and changing businesspractices. 1. Plan, prioritize, assign, supervise, review, and participate in the work of staff responsible for developing and delivering employee development programs. 2. Establish schedules and methods for providing technical, safety and supervisory/management training; identify resource needs;review needs with appropriate management staff; allocate resources accordingly. 3.. Participate in the development of policies and procedures; monitor work activities to ensure compliance with established policies and procedures; evaluates program effectiveness, consults with management to determine training needs, make recommendations for changes and improvements to existing standards and procedures. 4. Recommend and assist in the implementation of goals and objectives; implement approved policies and procedures. 5. Participate in the selection of training staff; provide or coordinate staff training;work with employees to correct deficiencies;implement discipline procedures. 6. Reviews contractors, consultants and vendors employee development programs to determine whether District staff is receiving adequate training on equipment/services, recommends and provides additional training as needed. 7. Participate in the preparation and administration of the employee development budget; submit budget recommendations;monitor expenditures. S. Perform the more technical and complex tasks of the work unit including in-house training,preparing reports,memoranda,and correspondence; make presentations to District employees and management regarding employee development administration. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Job Code: FLSA Status: CLASS SPECIFICATION Bargaining Unit:Supervisory Effective Date: CLASS TITLE: EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT SUPERVISOR PAGE: 2 9. Oversee the District tuition and certification reimbursement programs to ensure compliance with policies and procedures. 10. Implement and manage the various employee development programs—performance management and improvement, career planting, succession planning, Leadership program, e-leaming and safety training. 11. Prepare analytical and statistical reports on operations and activities. 12. Attend and participate in professional group meetings; stay abreast of new trends and innovations in the field of employee development. 13. Perform related duties as required. OUALDFICATIONS The following generally describes the knowledge and ability required to enter the job and/or be learned within a short period of time in order to successfully perform the assigned duties. Knowledge of: Operations, services,and activities of an employee development program. Principles of supervision,training,and performance evaluation. Pertinent federal,state,and local laws,codes,and regulations. Office procedures,methods,and equipment including computers and applicable software applications such as word processing,spreadsheets,and databases. Principles of business letter writing and basic report preparation. Ability to: Supervise,organize,and review the work of lower level staff. Select,supervise,train,and evaluate staff. Research,analyze,and evaluate new service delivery methods and techniques. Interpret and apply federal,state,and local policies,laws,and regulations. Interpret and explain District policies and procedures. Prepare clear and concise reports. Make presentations to District employees and management regarding employee development. Communicate clearly and concisely,both orally and in writing. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Education and Exuerience Guidelines -Any combination of education and experience that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying.A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: EducationlTraining: Equivalent to a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university with major course work in training, communications, human resources, or business administration or a related field. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Job Code: FLSA Status: CLASS SPECIFICATION Bargaining Unit:Supervisory Effective Dale: CLASS TITLE: EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT SUPERVISOR PAGE: 3 Exnerience: Six years of training experience including two years of administrative or lead supervisory responsibility. License or Certificate: Certification as an employee dcvelopmmt professional is highly desirable. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORNING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that mast be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job function. Environment: Standard office setting. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability to work in an office setting;stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; operate office equipment including use of a computer keyboard;push, pull, lift,and/or carry light amounts of weight;verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction; vision sufficient to read computer screens and printed documents;and to operate assigned equipment. Hearing:Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Date:January,2002 Johnson&Associates ATTACHMENT4 Orange County Sanitation DlsWel Classifications By Employee Group Professional Pay Hourly Monthly Annual Hourly Monthly Annual Range Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Maximum Claselfioations FLSA Status E14 36.243 6,282 $75,385 51.294 8,891 $106.692 Chief Scientist Exempt E13 34.568 5,992 $71,901 48.888 8.474 $101,607 Senior Engineer Exempt E12 32.932 6.708 $68,499 46.59D 8.076 $96,907 Senior Sdentlst Exempt E12 32,932 5.708 566.499 48.590 8.076 $96.207 Senior Regulatory Specialist Exempt "tail '1 Q12-M " '; IJi6 6f " 6-` S Obi v,#e c ,tF, Bc 66e 2 i ifd i ootttie'uiMA' 1Hi$l ifan !; Ell 31.329 5.430 $65.164 44.323 7.683 $92.192 Engineer Exempt Ell 31.329 5.430 $65,164 44.323 7.683 $92.192 IT Strategic Implementation Leader Exempt E10 1 29.792 1 5.164 $61.967 42.201 7,315 1 $87,778 Setary to the Board of Dlreclom Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59.139 40.250 6,977 $83,720 Pfinclipal Administrative Analyst Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 $83.720 Pdndpal Engineering Assodaw Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6.977 583,720 Project S dalist Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59.139 40.250 6.977 583.720 Regulatory Spedanst Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6.977 $83,720 Scientist Exempt E9 28.432 4.928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 $83.720 Principal Accountant Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59.139 40.250 6.977 $83,720 principal Finandal Analyst Exempt E8 27.039 4.687 $56,241 35.281 6,632 $79,683 Associate Englnear III Exempt E8 27.039 4,687 $56,241 38.261 6.632 $79,510 Princlipal EnAronmenntal Spedallst Exempt ES 27.039 4,687 $56,241 38.281 0.632 $79.583 ISafety S Emergency Response Specialist Exempt E7 25.785 4,469 $53,633 36.486 6.324 $75.891 Programmer Analyst Exempt E7 25.785 4,469 $53.633 36.486 6,324 $75,591 Computer Hardware Specialist Exempt E7 26.785 4.469 $53.633 36.486 6,324 $75.891 Telecommunications Specialist Exempt E7 25.785 4,469 $53,633 36.486 6.324 $75,691 Maintenance Planner Exempt E7 25.785 4,469 $53.633 36.486 6,324 $75.891 Contracts Administrator Exempt fxi all 4A69 583,6$3 38.46$ S,22d 578,89i E6 24.537 4,253 $51.037 34.706 6,016 $72.188 Principal Laboratory 8 Research Analyst Exempt Ell 24.537 4,253 $51,037 34.706 6.016 $72.188 Senlor Administrative Analyst Exempt ES 23.380 4.053 $48,630 33.070 5,732 $68,786 Assodate Engineer II Exempt E5 23.38D 4.053 $48,630 1 33.070 6,732 $68,786 Senior Accountant Exempt E5 23.300 4,053 $48.630 33.070 5.732 1 $68,786 1 Senior Financial Analyst Exempt E5 23.380 4.053 548.630 33.070 5.732 1 $08,786 ISenfor Environmental Specialist Exempt E4 22.271 3.800 $46,324 31.539 5,467 365.601 Safety Re resenteNe Exempt E4 22.271 3,880 $46.324 31.539 5.467 E65,601 Programmer Exempt E4 22.271 3,880 $46.324 31.539 15.467 1 $65,601 ISenlor Buyer Exempt E3 21.185 3.672 $44,085 30.004 1 5.201 1 562.408 JAssoclate Engineer 1 Exempt ATTACHMENT4 E2 20.214 3,504 $42,045 28.576 4,953a Contracts Specialist Exempt Ell 19.203 3,329 $39,942 27.249 4,723Accountant Exempt E1 19.203 3.329 $39.842 27.249 4.723Bu r Exempt E1 19.203 3.329 $39,942 27.249 4.723Flnancial Anal at Exempt E1 19.203 3,329 $39,942 27.249 4,723Mena ement Analyst Exempt Orange County Sanitation District Classifications By Employee Group Suporvlsory Pay Hourly Monthly Annual Hourly Monthly Annual Range Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Maximum Classifications FLEA Status E14 36.243 6.282 $75,385 51.294 8,891 $106,692 Engineering Supervisor Exempt E13 34.568 5,992 $71.901 48.888 8,474 $101.657 Environmental Management Supervisor Exempt E12 32.932 5,708 $68,499 46.590 8,076 $96,907 Laboratory Supervisor Exempt Ell 31.329 5,430 $65.164 44.323 7,683 $92,192 Senior Operations Supervisor Exempt Ell 31.329 5,430 $65,164 44.323 7,683 $92,192 Senior Maintenance Supervisor Exempt Ell 31.329 5,430 $65.164 44.323 7.683 $92,192 Intonmagon Technology Supervisor Exempt Ell 31.329 5,430 $65,184 44.323 7,683 $92.192 Contracts 8 Purchasing Supervisor Exempt Ell 1 31.329 1 5.430 $65.164 44.323 1 7.683 $92.192 lAccounflng Supervisor Exempt E71 31.329 5,430 $85,184 d4.323 7,883 $92,192 Safe Supervisor Exempt •:, i# g z 3 E9 26.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6,97.7 $83,720 Maintenance Supervisor Exe t E9 28A32 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 $83,720 Operations Supervisor Exam t E9 28.432 6,928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 $83,720 Source Control Supervisor Exem t E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 $83,720 Su rvising Construction Inspector Exempt E9 28.432 4,928 $59,139 40.250 6,977 $83,720 Warehouse Su Meer Exempt T ' MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT April 22, 2002, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on April 22, 2002. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode Iry Pickier, Chairman Russell Patterson Phil Anthony Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Larry Kraemer Jr. Laurann Cook, Alternate No. 3 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Staff: Directors: Kell! Burn-Roy, Bruce Chalmers, Dick Corneille Blake Anderson Jan Debay —Camp Dresser& McKee Jim Herberg Wes Bannister John Collins—City of Fountain Valley Bob Ooten Denis Bilodeau Bill Butler— Montgomery Watson Harza Wendy Sevenandt Staff: Dennis MacLain — City of Huntington Beach Counsel: Virginia Grebbien Bob Finn — Brown & Caldwell Brad Hogin Debra Burris Richard Bell - IRWD Steve Conklin Annette McCluskey, Rick Manter, Joanne Daugherty Suzanne Choi — NCG Porter Novell! Tom Dawes Cristian Rayter- HOK Bill Everest Kelly Rowe - KERA Jill Everhart Mike Jouhad— City of Anaheim Cindy Ferch Ron Linsky- NW RI Dave Henry John Kennedy Mike Markus Rafael Mujedego Katherine O'Connor Mehul Patel Lily Pham Mike Samples Laura Thomas Ron Wildermuth - 1 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 22,2002 r' P CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Meeting Upon motion by Director Patterson seconded by Director Anthony and carried, with Director Eckenrode abstaining, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held March 11, 2002 were approved as mailed. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Review of GWR System Status Director Pickier introduced the new OCWD General Manager Virginia Grebbien. Ms. Grebbien stated that she had sent a memo to the GWR System staff stating how excited she is to be a part of the OCWD organization and to work on this project. She noted that she is looking forward to working with everyone on this project, water reuse issues, and water proprietary issues in Orange County. She reported that she has met With OCSD General Manager Blake Anderson, all of the OCWD Board of Directors, and most of the groundwater producers in Orange County's service area, and that all, except Director Pickier, expressed concerns about the project. She stated that she has asked the OCWD Board and now is asking the Committee to have the opportunity to have a couple of months to reexamine and analyze the project so that she can address questions that have been asked of her. She stated that she has built a number of water recycling projects and wants to move forward with this project with consensus. She reported that she would come back to the Committee at the next meeting with a work plan on how to do the analysis. She also reported that it would be prudent if we continue to move forward with some of the design efforts and to move forward to gain state and federal loans and grants. Director Eckenrode stated that after receipt of Ms. Grebbien's memo, three OCSD directors, who are also JCC members, called him expressing their concerns: 1)of slowing the project; 2)that time, effort, and money have been invested on the project in the last five years; and 3)grants that we may or may not have to repay if the project does not go forward. He noted that the OCSD directors he spoke with want the project to move forward because we still have a need of water for residents and we need to gain independence from purchasing water from the north. He reiterated that on March 28, 2001, both Boards of Directors approved a "go" decision. Director Patterson stated that we absolutely need consensus and need to be up to speed and that a slow down could result in added costs. He asked staff to tell the Committee what is changing; do we have CDM looking for things to do; are we stopping everything except design; and are we paying them for the slow down? Mr. Dawes reported that nearly $1 million per month is being spent on the project at this time. - 2 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 22, 2002 Director Patterson asked if there is a potential cost impact to the project for a two-month slow down while Ms. Grebbien gets up to speed and how can that be mitigated so that we can diffuse both without getting a cost impact. Ms. Grebbien reported that she has met with staff on the level of design work and she would continue what is going on now, and not start new design efforts over the next two months. She noted that she is not sympathetic to design engineer change orders when a time out is taken to review design issues and that there will be no cost changes associated with the review. She reported that she will be looking at the project from the beginning. She noted that five years ago four problems were identified and she wants to investigate and see if they still exist: 1)the barrier that OCWD operates is insufficient; 2)Water Factory 21 is ending its useful life; 3) a new water supply for replenishment is needed; and 4)the outfall issue. She noted that some OCWD directors are worried about these problems, if they still exist, is there still a commitment to the project, and how will there be resolution? She reported that there is a "no project" alternative versus the GWR System alternative or something in between. She also noted that we are at a point in the design where we can complete design work while answering some fundamental questions about the organization of the project from OCWD's prospective. She reported that if OCWD's concems can't be resolved, we need to know that now rather than 18 months from now. She noted that while we are completing the design work, if we determine that the impact on OCWD's finances are just too significant at this point in time, then OCWD should step back. Director Patterson noted that OCSD has had an ongoing reimbursement agreement, with amendments several times, with OCWD and that we have developed Draft 32 of a new O&M Agreement. He asked if Ms. Grebbien thought that an O&M Agreement could be completed during this two-month period. She stated that she and Mr. Anderson have come up with an approach to work on issues on the O&M Agreement and that they will come back to staff with an understanding of what it will take to get the O&M Agreement done, which will then be taken both Boards for their concurrence. Mr. Anderson stated that articles contained in the O&M Agreement need to provide an understanding what is behind that particular article, and what is to be accomplished by it, and come up with clear language that can accomplish this goal. He stated that for OCSD, the main thing is the long-term accountability, that the Water District can operate the GWR System for the next 50 years. Ms. Grebbien stated that she is optimistic that issues in the O&M Agreement are communicated so that what OCSD wants to accomplish and what OCWD wants to accomplish are compatible. Director Patterson stated we do represent the same taxpayers and that that the project has been delayed too much, and this delay can endanger grant monies, and add hidden costs. - 3 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 22,2002 j Ms. Grebbien noted that at this time she does not have 100% support for the project from her side and this review is needed. She stated that we can make positive movements forward in the things that we need to do, i.e., continuing to solicit financial support for the project, while working on terns and conditions for the agreement. Director Anthony noted that Ms. Grebbien reviewed the financial analysis weeks before she started working at OCWD, and in the process of hiring her, the Board asked her to review everything in OCWD's financial operation and that OCWD wants to keep everything moving much as it is. He noted that the project slow down should not have a cost impact and is not a delaying or stopping work. Director Bilodeau stated that Ms. Grebbien should have an opportunity to be 100% up to speed on the project and supports her request to have a second look at the project. The intent is not to stall the project, but that it should go forward with the best data we can get. Director Cook asked 'How did we not ask these questions before we got where we are today?' Director Pickier stated that directors change over the years and have old, new and the same questions that we have had before. He noted that with the change of OCW D's general manager, it is important to give Ms. Grebbien a chance to came up to date and get the full focus of where we are headed. Mr. Anderson stated that since the March 28, 2001 "go, no-go" decision, financial studies have been completed; preliminary engineering work by CDM; considerable environmental reports have been completed; and core questions about the project were answered satisfactorily to both Boards. He noted that two other things occurred at that time, 1) a commitment to answer the 11 issues to the Groundwater Producers Advisory Committee and 2) an equivocal 'go' decision, because we convinced ourselves that both Boards had off ramps. He noted that looking back at it, it was a mistake and should have had more unequivocal actions by both Boards. He stated that all questions and issues should be brought forward and answered clearly, and then both Boards and all staff should become unequivocal in decision-making. He reported that it is everyone's responsibility to go through it and move forward. He noted that a lot of money is at stake on this huge capital project on the part of both Boards and in the future OCSD will be reaching a 'fork in the road'; to move forward with the GWR System and provide a water resource, or for OCSD to put in a more conventional infrastructure in the ground which includes a large outfall. He stated that if OCSD goes down that road, that will be a very unequivocal decision and OCSD would have no financial reason or ability to come back into the project. He addressed the OCWD Board to understand that the OCSD's primary reason for being partners with OCWD, going back to the mid-1960's, is to produce reclaimed water. He stated that within the last few years, it was recognized as a financial opportunity for OCSD to offset a second outfall, but that is the second reason that OCSD became involved in this project. He noted that going back to OCSD's 1989 Master Plan, the original reason was for the -4 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes ti April 22, 2002 purpose of reclaiming water. He noted that OCSD's commitment has been systemic to the thinking and philosophy of the OCSD Board for 30 years and that the Water District Board, during the same 30 years, has had a remarkable commitment to reclamation in Water Factory 21, the Green Acres Project, all the projects OCWD has done, and that there is no other water district in California that has gone this far toward water conservation, water capture, water reclamation than this OCWD Board, which is a legacy that the OCWD Board has to pay attention to in its deliberations in the next few months. After lengthy discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Anthony and seconded Director Kraemer, and approved unanimously, staff is directed to bring back a project review, and in an effort not to stop or delay the project, but to keep moving forward. Director Debay noted that there have been too many side bar and split conversations have been held and requested that a joint meeting of decision makers be established as soon as possible, and to include the groundwater producers. Mr. Anderson stated that consideration be given to holding a meeting for the joint senior staff of both agencies to discuss technical, financial, and other issues, and that responses will be brought back to the Committee; given then to the general managers to ask their respective Boards whether to proceed to each Board individually or at a Joint Board Meeting. 3. Approve Plans & Specifications for Portion of West Barrier Extension Supply Line Ms. Grebbien introduced Program Manager Tom Dawes who reported that this item is an informational item for OCSD and an action item for OCWD. Mr. Dawes reported that the existing seawater intrusion barrier is along Ellis Avenue and stops on the east side of the Edison right-of-way that is perpendicular to Ellis Avenue, between the streets of Magnolia and Newland. He reported that OCWD has proceeded with the Talbert Barrier West End Improvement project to build two wells within the Edison easement on the south side of Ellis Avenue and the design is complete. He recommended an addition of 800 feet of pipeline be approved that will extend the pipe westerly from the Edison easement through the Newman Street intersection. He reported that the City of Fountain Valley intends to pave Newland Street within the next year and will have a five-year moratorium on street excavation beginning in the year 2003 and that this work needs to be completed ahead of their paving project. Director Bannister asked if this was part of the GWR System. Mr. Dawes stated that this portion of the pipeline was in the GWR System's design and is now part of OCWD's Talbert Barrier West End Improvement project, but we are not - 5 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 22, 2002 j clear on the funding since OCWD is getting full funding from Metropolitan Water District of Southern Califomia. Upon motion of Director Anthony, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, recommend to the OCWD Board approval of a line item in OCWD Talbert West End Improvement Project contract documents, which will allow for an 800-foot extension to the GWR System Barrier Pipeline on the West End of the Barrier on Ellis Avenue from the Newland Street intersection. The engineer's estimate is $160,000. 4. Security and Building Exterior Issues Mr. Dawes recommended the following for security and exterior building materials: metal clad buildings; wrought iron fence with pilasters; and a chain link fencing between OCWD and OCSD. Director Cook recommended that staff confer with the City of Fountain Valley first, for their approval, before bringing these issues to the Committee. Mr. Dawes reported that a letter has been drafted to Andrew Perea, Fountain Valley Planning Director, to schedule a date and time to make a presentation to the Planning Commission. There was no action taken on this item. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 5. Public Information and Education Update Ms. Grebbien introduced Annette McCluskey, NCG Porter Novelli, who reported that at 10:00 a.m. on this Friday, April 26, Assemblypersons Lynn Daucher and Ken Maddox will receive a GWR briefing and that Senator Ed Royce has sent a letter of support for the project. Ms. McCloskey introduced her associates, Suzanne Choi and Rick Manter, who gave a briefing on research and telephone surveys. Ms. Choi reported that after Vietnamese and Latino community briefings, the Vietnamese group remained opposed and the Latino community was overall positive seeing a need for more technology and a need for the project; and more education is needed on the project. Mr. Merrier reported that an extensive telephone survey was conducted in December that has resulted in a 142-page report. He reported that the focus groups yielded these conclusions: 1)water is not a top priority; 2)the project had mixed support; 3) most said that the project was not needed; 4) safety of water was not important; 5)that cost is not - 6 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes �t April 22, 2002 an issue; and 6) at the end of the focus group meeting, when the project was understood, there was almost unanimous support of the project. He also reported on a quantitative telephone survey that gave these results: 1) water is not a high priority; 2) a need for quality and quantity exists; 3) water bills are not too high; 4) 50% supported new water sources; 5)water needs are for the future, not today; 6) and no rationing is wanted. A separate report will be given to OCSD Board on Wednesday, April 24. Ms. McCluskey stated that a formal synopsis will be given to the OCWD Board and that a presentation will be given to the OCSD Board. Mr. Ron Linsky, NWRI, requested a copy of the report. 6. Report on Alternative Alignment/ Right-of-way Studies Mr. Dawes reported that the Value Engineering (VE) Study recommendation to use Anaheim's city streets instead of the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel for the GWR Pipeline, Unit 3, would actually cost more money and not save money as suggested by the VE team. The VE Study report was sent to the State Water Resources Control Board, but no response has been received. He reported on two problems areas in acquiring site acquisitions for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline and well sites rights-of-way. He reported that the City of Huntington Beach does not like the location of the OCWD Green Acres Project (GAP) line, and in 20 to 25 years may want the Water District to move it as a condition of a new easement for the Southeast Barrier Pipeline. He reported that the second area that we are having problems with is getting through the Fountain Valley School District site which has been leased to a private school, Pegasus School, for 50 years of which 49 years are still remaining on the lease. He reported that the site appraisal came in at $220,000; was budgeted for$70,000; and we have offered them $141,000. He also reported on the status of four well sites that have been selected for acquisition on Ellis Avenue, from Newland Street to Beach Boulevard: 1) a house that has been acquired; 2) an easement within a mobile home park, which the Water District has yet to ratify; 3)the Baptist Church and 4) at the Faith Lutheran Church. All well sites will be within the budgeted amount in total. Director Anderson requested a copy of the 60% Value Engineering Study. 7. Microfilter Bid Protest Ms. Grebbien reported that both Boards have awarded a contract to USFilter Corporation for microfiltration equipment and Pall, the other proposer, is protesting the decision by formal letter from their attomey, Castle & Lax. She reported that the Districts' attorneys are reviewing the Pall protest and that more information will be brought back to the Committee at a later date. - 7 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 22, 2002 Director Bilodeau suggested in the future a closed session be held on these types of items that may require litigation. 8. Ultraviolet Liaht Equipment Update Ms. Grebbien reported that a letter received today from Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez regarding the Districts' selection of Trojan Technologies as the ultraviolet light equipment manufacturer. She reported that the letter questioned the financial integrity of Trojan and promoted a 'buy American' effort. Director Patterson asked if the qualifications of the proposers and a bond provision were required in the bid documents. Mr. Dawes stated that the bid documents required both proposers to submit a statement from their bonding company stating that they could enter into a bond, if chosen, and both proposers complied. He reported that Trojan's bonding company was checked and found to be a top rated bonding company. Director Patterson requested that Trojan's bonding company report be included in the next staff report to the Committee. 9. Status Report Mr. Dawes reported on the following: A. The Southern California Edison Substation will have a remote terminal unit, a device that will be directly connected to SCE offices, to notify them of problems. He reported that the cost was not in the original estimate, but within the contingency and no new added cost will be added to the project for this item. He also noted that the substation has been renamed the 'Kiwi Substation'. B. During construction of the GWR Pipeline, Reach Il, from the south end of 17`" Street in Santa Ana to Katella, it will be necessary to move the existing bike trail to the east side which has residential backyard encroachments into city property. He reported that the GWR Pipeline is proposed in the West levee, which is currently used for hiking and biking trail and that this issue has been brought up at a public meeting in Santa Ana. He reported that due to local residents' opposition, the biking trail should be moved to the east side using a combination of residential streets and some land owned by the City of Santa Ana. He noted that staff is looking at alternatives to reevaluate the bike detour. He stated that there is no problem with the design of the pipe, but the issue is where to put the bike trail detour. Director Franklin suggested that staff should consider re-routing the bike trail and that there might be more issues in the near future. - 8 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 22,2002 Mr. Dawes introduced Debra Bums, project coordinator, who continued with the following two items: C. Ms. Burris reminded the Committee that there will be a tour on Thursday, April 25, 2002 of the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Treatment Site as well as the Chino Desalter, both of which discharge into the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI). She noted that the tour has been setup to address DHS's concems. D. She reported that last month OCWD received $1.87 million from the Bureau of Reclamation, for a total of$5.52 million (out of$6 million), part of our approved $20 million grant. E. Mr. Dawes reported that OCWD applied for$150 million in financing from the State Water Resources Control Board, of which $145 million is in loans and $5 million in grants,which is the maximum allowed and was granted to the project in January. He stated that the state has given us a portion of the loan, which is $14.83 million at an interest rate of 2.4%. The remaining balance of$130 million will be acted on in June by the State and that there should be no reason not to receive the balance. F. He reported that staff is looking into service-sharing between OCWD and OCSD for the project and that in some areas money can be saved for both agencies: i.e., using OCSD's electrical 12 kV maintenance staff, and gasoline pump to save taxpayer's dollars. G. SAWPA has notified us that the SAWPA Agreement has been signed and that we can begin billing them for the $37 million in grant funds effective now and that we owe a vote of thanks to OCWD President and SAWPA President Jerry King for helping to obtain these funds. He noted that the GWR System is the first grant to be issued. Director Eckenrode asked if SAWPA would have to be repaid if the project does not move forward. Mr. Dawes responded that yes, it would have to be repaid. REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGERS Mr. Anderson reported that he and Director Eckenrode will be meeting with Assemblyman Ken Maddox tomorrow who has drafted a bill for full secondary treatment and denying the waiver for the ocean ouffall. He stated that it would be a $400 million matter to OCSD. He stated that if anyone would like a draft version of the letter to the committee and assembly of the State Senate on this matter, he would provide one. - g - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes April 22, 2002 Director Anderson requested that phone calls or a-mails be used instead of mailings for cancellation of meetings. Ms. Grebbien stated that she and Director Franklin saw Congresswoman Sanchez at a luncheon last Friday and that she was very effusive about her support for the GW R System. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, May 13 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley and that it will be the only meeting in May. - 10 - �1 ,r BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. os/zz gz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 16(t) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRE-SELECTION - GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Trojan Technologies as the Ultraviolet Light(UV) Equipment manufacturer for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR) based on lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$20,253,000, and a total capital cost of$9,749,405, plus tax; (2)Approve a Pre- Selection Agreement between Orange County Water District(OCWD)and Trojan Technologies to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000,to be equally shared between OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District; (3) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the UV Equipment to the construction contract to install the demonstration UV system at a total cost of$849,842, plus tax; and (4) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the UV Equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV system at a total estimated capital cost of$8,649,563, plus tax. SUMMARY • In March 2002, the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) recommended the actions as written above regarding the award of UV disinfection equipment for the GWR System. • The Board of Directors deferred action back to staff to address a letter issued by Calgon Carbon Corporation dated March 1, 2002. • Staff has addressed the issues in a response letter dated April 9, 2002,to Calgon Carbon Corporation. • The Chair of the JCC received a letter dated April 18, 2002,from Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez recommending award of future contracts to United State fines. • Staff has addressed the"Buy American"concern set forth in her letter and presents the reasons to reconsider awarding to Trojan Technologies in the additional information section below. • Staff recommends selecting Trojan Technologies as the UV Equipment manufacturer for the GWR System. • Approval is requested to award a $250,000 contract to Trojan Technologies for engineering design documents at this time. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The value of the agreement award for each agency with this action is$250,000 to be equally shared with OCWD in the amount of$125,000. The authorization of funds was made in October 2001,for the engineering documents only in the amount of$125,000. There is no increase in the cost for engineering documents. Authorization of expenditures for the UV Equipment will be requested with the award of the construction contracts in the future. Although the proposal by Trojan Technologies was over the axa :WOM Page 1 i r engineer's estimate, a budget increase is not requested at this time. Sufficient Funds are available existing in contingency for the increase over the engineer's estimate, but adjustments 0 will not be requested until the construction contracts are awarded. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2001-02 CIP Budget Sec. 8, page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Please refer to the Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In October 2001, the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) Board of Directors authorized issuance of a Request for Proposals for the pre-selection of Ultraviolet Light(UV) Equipment estimated at$10,250,000, and granted authority to the Orange County Water District(OCWD) Board of Directors to award a contract for equipment design in the amount of$250,000, also granted authority to the OCWD Board of Directors to assign the value of equipment to construction contracts for installation. The request for proposals was sent to four firms specializing in UV disinfection equipment and two proposals were received. Proposals were received from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies on February 27, 2002. Both proposals were over the engineer's estimate of$10,250,000 with tax included in the total cost. Trojan Technologies proposes the lowest capital cost of$10,439,990.61 with tax included at 7.75%and the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$20,253,000. With this approval, a contract in the amount of$250,000 will be awarded to Trojan Technologies for engineering design documents. The value of the UV disinfection equipment as proposed by Trojan Technologies will be assigned to the demonstration unit construction contractor and the permanent facilities construction contractor. These contracts are scheduled for bid and award in the Summer of 2002 and Spring of 2003. These installation contracts will be brought before the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) and the OCSD and OCWD Board of Directors in accordance with the adopted procedures that will be in effect at that time. The Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) approved the recommended action on March 11, 2002. Please refer to the attached March 11, 2002 JCC Agenda Item Submittal. Staff reported on the Calgon Carbon Corporation letter and responded at the April 22, 2002 JCC meeting. Staff also distributed a letter dated April 18, 2002, from Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez at the JCC meeting on April 22, 2002. Staff has investigated the issues brought forth in the letter and recommends the Board consideration of the recommendation to award a contract to Trojan Technologies for the following reasons: 1. Considering all principal Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR) equipment; Microfiltration/Reverse Osmosis/Ultraviolet Light the majority of expenditures will be from domestic manufacturers (all pre-qualified Reverse Osmosis manufacturers are domestic); R sed: a WB Page 2 2. The"Buy American" provision in Federal regulations (40 CFR, 35-936-13.d) indicates that ' domestic equipment may be used in preference to non-domestic equipment if the cost difference is no more than 6%, and a greater differential is deemed unreasonable; Calgon's equipment cost is 24%greater than Trojan's costs(12% higher in life-cycle cost); 3. Because of the size of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR) construction contracts, it is expected (not guaranteed)that only domestic contractors will submit bids; 4. Recent questions raised by Calgon concerning the technical and financial viability of Trojan Technologies proposal have been resolved to the satisfaction of the GWR System staff; _ and, 5. This action only involves a $250,000 commitment to complete the final design of the Ultraviolet Light Equipment(now one of the critical path items of the AWTF design); future authorizations to award construction contracts for installation of this equipment will be approved by the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)Board of Directors. ALTERNATIVES Alternatives to issuing a proposal for pre-selection of the UV Equipment included pre-purchase of the equipment or preparing final designs for all equipment options. Pre-purchase of the equipment was not selected to reduce liability to the agencies and place liability for the equipment on the Contractor. With substantial differences in each equipment design, preparing final designs for each manufacturer was determined to be cost prohibitive. CEGA FINDINGS The OCSD and Orange County Water District(OCWD) Boards of Directors certified the Environmental Impact Report for the GWR System on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001, Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. March 11, 2002 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Ultraviolet Light Equipment Pre-selection. 3. Letter dated March 1, 2002 from Calgon Carbon Corporation. 4. Letter dated April 9, 2002 from OCWD to Calgon Carbon Corporation. 5. Letter dated April 18, 2002,from Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez. 6. April 22, 2002 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Ultraviolet Equipment Update WTS:sa G1ntg1obaMgenda Draft ReportsVoint eoardo-36 GWRS UV 0502AM Re :sauna Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORUMDTO AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET GATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Poled Development $ 700,000 $ 410M S 4,000 S 4,000 S 4,000 S 4,000 100% SludieslPermilli 4,000.000 S 4.000,000 $ 4,000.000 S 4,000,000 S 4.000,000 100% Consultant PSA' S 7,500.000 S 18.400,000 $ 18,400,000 S 18,158,334 $ 18.158.334 S 3,000,000 17% Draw Staff S 2,349.000 $ 1,349,000 $ 1,349.000 $ t,349.000 S 1,349,000 S 2,500,000 185% Construction Contrad" S 86.481,500 $ 137.500.000 S 137.500.000 $ 9,642.655 S 9.642.655 S 0% Construction Administration"' $ 2.653.900 S 6.021.000 S 6.021D00 $ 5.496,519 S 5496,519 $ 0% Constroction Inspection $ 9.345.600 S 326.000 S 326,000 4 S - $ 0% Contingency $ 12.895,000 If 15,100.000 $ 15,100.01 S $ - $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 121.925.000 S 182,700,000 $ - $ 182.700.000 $ 38.6%.508 $ - $ 38.650.508 $ 9,504,000 25% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ - 5 28,000,000 S 28.000,000 11 S 2,112.500 PROJECT NET $ 121,925,000 1 $ 154,700.000 1$ - $ 154.700.000 S 38.650,508 S - $ 38.650,508 1 S T,391,500 19% Funds authonzed W date includes maple contracts issued under the terms of Itne Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for 0ie Groundwater Replenishment System with One Orange County Water District -'Funds authorized to date incbde Pipeline at Theo La Jail,SCE substation construdien.lemperary office facilities,agreement aM easements,production of MFIUV vendor design documents,and Owner Controlled Insurance Program. "'Funds authorized W dale induce CmstruGion Management Sev kes awarded on Febroary 27,2002 G:1wp dWWgUOBS 8 CONTR4CTSU-36%-36 budget Wde 032702 Boad.AslOBM 8 W"red OCSD Confidential 08M 8 UV award Pagel Agenda Item #3 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: March 11, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRE-SELECTION SUMMARY Two proposals were received on February 27, 2002 to provide ultraviolet light (UV) equipment for the Groundwater Replenishment System. Proposals were received from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies. Four firms including Wedeco- Ideal Horizons and Aquionics had been pre-qualified to provide the equipment. The proposal received from Trojan Technologies had the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost. The Trojan Technologies proposal also had the lowest capital cost of the UV equipment. The proposed capital cost of the UV equipment at$9,749,405 plus tax or $10,439,990.61 including tax at 7.75%, is above the engineer's estimate of $10,250,000 (without the 15% contingency added). Based on the results of the present worth life cycle cost analysis, the recommended pre-selected UV equipment manufacturer is Trojan Technologies. The Trojan bid provides significant ongoing operations and maintenance savings compared to our estimates. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for March 20 OCWD Board meeting and for March 27 OCSD Board meeting. A. Approve Addendums 1 and 2 providing a time extension and technical clarifications. B. Recommend that the Boards of Directors of OCWD and OCSD authorize OCWD to award a pre-selection agreement to Trojan Technologies for the manufacture of ultraviolet light equipment for the Groundwater Replenishment System for the total capital cost of$9,749,405 plus tax as follows: 1.) Authorize payment to Trojan Technologies for engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000. 2.) Assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to a future contract to install the demonstration UV system at a total cost of$849,842, plus tax. - 1 - Agenda Item #3 3.) Assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV system at a total estimated capital cost of$8,649,563, plus tax. BACKGROUND On October 8, 2001 your Committee approved the use of a present worth life cycle cost analysis as the basis for pre-selection of the UV equipment manufacturer. In September, the Board of Directors of the OCSD authorized the award of this contract if at or below the Engineers Estimate of$10,250,000. The criteria used for the determination of the lowest present worth life-cycle cost included the capital cost of a demonstration UV system, capital cost of the permanent UV system, lamp replacement price, lamp life warranty period, and operational costs over a 25-year life. The operational costs included energy costs. An interest rate of 6% was used in the present worth calculation. The amount of energy necessary for operation of each manufacturers system was to be guaranteed by the manufacturer in their proposal. A value of 6.5 cents per kWh was used for energy cost calculations. In addition, a payment of $250,000, MF system engineering costs, was included in the proposal determined by staff for all bidders. The demonstration UV system has a capacity of 5 mgd and will be installed near the time when the temporary MF system will be constructed. The demonstration UV system will be used to verify the performance of the UV manufacturer's design for NDMA destruction and disinfection efficiency prior to delivery of the full UV system. The Department of Health Services (DHS) requires that installed UV systems show proof of disinfection efficiency prior to the system being put into full operation. Testing the demonstration system allows the design team to have confidence in the UV manufacturer's proposed design and meet DHS requirements. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS The engineers estimate for the capital cost of the equipment including the demonstration UV system, permanent UV system, $250,000 lump sum for engineering services, and sales tax was $10,250,000. (The original estimate was based on sales tax at 7.5%, it was bid at 7.75%. Depending on State of California finances, the sales tax rate may change before the equipment is delivered and payment is made.) The basis of pre-selection is the lowest present worth life-cycle cost. This type of present worth analysis includes all capital as well as O&M costs over the 25-year period chosen for the analysis. The Request for Proposal (RFP) and two addenda (attached) were sent to four pre- qualified UV equipment manufacturers. Two proposals were received on February 26, 2002, from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies. The other two pre- qualified manufacturers, Wedeco-Ideal Horizons and Aquionics, did not submit a proposal for this project. The results of the proposals received were as follows: - 2 - Agenda Item#3 Table 1 UV Equipment Pre-Selection Proposals Proposal Price Proposal Price Calculated MF Proposed for Capital Cost for Capital Cost Present Manufacturer Lam of Equipment' of Equipment' P type (not including (including sales Cycle Cost Life C sales tax) tax 7.75%) Cycle Trojan Low pressure- $9,749,405 $10,439,990.61 $20,253,000 Technologies high intensity Calgon Medium $12 087,235.38 $12,958,650.07 $22,648,000 Carbon Copressure . Includes lump sum cost of$250,000 for special engineering services. The proposal received from Trojan Technologies had the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost. The Trojan Technologies proposal also had the lowest capital cost of the UV equipment. The proposed capital cost of the UV equipment was above the engineer's estimate, $10,250,000, for both proposals (the Trojan proposal was below when tax is not included). Based on the results of the present worth life cycle cost analysis, the pre-selected UV equipment manufacturer should be Trojan Technologies. The UV equipment procurement will involve three separate contracts. The UV equipment procurement will include the following three contracts: 1. Demonstration and permanent UV system engineering (shop drawings/layout preparation/control system design) 2. Demonstration UV system (5 mgd) 3. Permanent UV system (70 mgd which includes the 5 mgd demonstration system) The first contract is between OCWD and Trojan Technologies as the UV equipment manufacturer. The amount of this contract will be limited to $250,000. This contract enables the treatment plant design team to prepare the work required to design the facilities necessary for the selected UV system. The contract for the demonstration UV system will be assigned to the general contractor chosen to install the demonstration UV system at a value of $849,842 plus tax. The contract for the permanent UV system will be assigned to the AWT general contractor at a value of $8,649,563, plus tax. Table 2 summarizes the breakdown of the Trojan Technologies contract. Table 2 Breakdown of Trojan Technologies UV Proposal Contract Proposal Price not including sales tax) Engineering services $250,000 Demonstration UV system equipment $849,842 - 3 - Agenda Item #3 Permanent UV system equipment $8,649,563 TOTAL $9,749,405 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE IMPLICATION The December 2000 project cost estimate of $352 million included estimated costs for the UV system power consumption and lamp replacement. The annual power estimate was $14/AF, but based on the Trojan proposal the actual cost would be $7.00/AF. This represents a project cost savings of $7.00/AF. Also, the annual lamp replacement cost estimate was $5.001AF and the Trojan proposal provides a cost of $3.00/AF. This is a savings of$2.00/AF for a total savings of$9.00/AF. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS Discussed from time to time under the Project Development Phase, including July 30 and October 8, 2001. Attachments — RFP Addenda 1 and 2 - 4 - CALGON CALOON CARBON CORPORATION Orange County Water District March 1, 2002 PO Box8300 Fountain Valley,Ca 92728-8300 Attention: Mehul Patel; Project Manager Re: Calgon Carbon Corporation Proposal Review Dear Mr..Patel, On behalf of Calgon Carbon Corporation,I would like to thank Orange County in advance for the consideration of our technology. I trust that you found our response to the bid package both complete and in full compliance with the specifications. As a point of fact,Calgon Carbon Corporation has taken no exceptions to the bid. We respectfully request that the evaluation committee consider that the system proposed by Calgon Carbon Corporation is consistent with the Calgon Carbon Corporation UV systems currently in use at Orange County. This provides a number of benefits that are not explicitly accounted for in the bid evaluation. These points can be summarized as follows: Proven technoloev Calgon Carbon Corporation's UV technology for this application has been successfidly demonstrated by Orange County. Our proposed system will meet or exceed all treatment objectives and regulatory requirements. By selection of our bid,Orange County will not have to address any potential non-compliance issues. Orange County can select Calgon Carbon Corporation's equipment with the confidence that the technology is proven and reliable. Operator Experience Pursuant to the point above, selection of the Calgon Carbon Corporation System ensures that Orange County is familiar and comfortable with the routine operation of the UV system and no additional expense will be required for the training of operators. Consistency of components Consistency in equipment supply permits Orange County to minimize spare parts purchasing and inventory. Due to increased volume,Calgon Carbon Corporation was able to offer Orange County attractive pricing for the supply of replacement lamps. Should Calgon Carbon Corporation's bid be selected, Orange County would be in the 1 position to order replacement lamps at the reduced price for all of its systems. The difference between the list price of our lamps and this discounted price represents a substantial operating cost savings on the systems currently installed. Specifically, Orange County could realize savings of$1.7 Million on a NPV basis or$134,550 per year. This major operation savings needs to be considered as an added economic benefit of selecting Calgon Carbon Corporation. Outside of the benefits provided to Orange County by selecting a similar system, there are also many other factors that need to be considered in awarding the contract for this project: Financial stability of Respondents This contract considers the life cycle costs of the LYV system over twenty years. Certainly the financial stability of the selected vendor needs to be taken in to account when considering the long-term partnership. We strongly urge Orange County to investigate and compare the financial strength and prospects for all bidders. Non-Compliance issues: As previously mentioned, Calgon Carbon Corporation submitted its bid with no exceptions to the bid specification. We would ask the evaluation committee to ensure that all bidders have met these criteria. We would specifically request that the evaluation committee review the following areas in detail: • Vessel desinn: The bid documents specify that the reactors have a design pressure of 100 psig. We can only assume that to comply with the specification, the lamps and the quartz sleeves must be installed in the reactor prior to testing. The Calgon vessel design pressure is in fact 100 psig with the lamps and quarts sleeves installed in the vessel. • PLC controls and Ethernet communication: We have noted that in past bid responses from one of our competitors,their design was based on utilizing a proprietary control card to accomplish equipment level controls. In the case of the Orange County bid,the most likely use of this technology would be to utilize the proprietary control card for floor level control. The system would then simply communicate status and set point information through a serial link back to the SCADA system. This would not meet the specification of requiring brand name PLC controls and Ethernet based communications to VO. • PLC selection: As a point of clarification,Orange County indicated in writing to Calgon Carbon Corporation that a GE Series 90/70 was a requirement of the bid. We did include the GE Series 90/70 in our scope of work. • Harmonic mitieation equipment Calgon Carbon Corporation had questioned the requirement of the harmonic mitigation equipment. We did receive written confirmation of the requirement. Therefore, the harmonic mitigation equipment along with the dual feed automatic transfer switching, full structure switchgear with draw-out breakers, facilities equipment, power monitoring software and the short circuit study are included in our scope of work. 2 • SCADA Svstem: Calgon Carbon Corporation has included a redundant server option for the GE Cimplicity Open Process SCADA system. a System Integrators: As a supplier of a complete system, which includes a0 integration,we would call into question our competitions' ability to meet the bid specification with respect to locally based System Integrators. Design Basis We have designed our system with the capability to perform with a water transmittance at 95%T. Based on initial information provided at the bid opening, we question the ability of the other bidders equipment to meet these criteria. We believe that this issue requires serious attention on the part of Orange County. Installation Costs Calgon Carbon Corporation system is designed to minimize installation costs. By providing a horizontal design in which all components are at floor level,it allows for easy and safe access by operation personnel as no platforms or ladders are necessary for maintenance. Also,by minimizing the number of lamps utilized(120 vs.thousands of lamps) minimal electrical installation is required in the form of terminations,conduit nuts,and lamp installation. In summary,the reactor orientation and the reduced number of lamps required by Calgon Carbon Corporation's system,results in substantial installations savings to Orange County. Maintenance Costs Calgon Carbon Corporation system is designed to minimize maintenance costs. By utilizing only 120 lamps(only 50 in operation)vs. thousands of lamps,there is substantially less time spent replacing lamps. In addition,the recommended quarterly inspection and replacement of quartz sleeves becomes extremely labor intensive and costly when considering the amount of installed lamps. To summarize,we hope that you find these additional thoughts on the project helpful,not only in terms of potential future cost avoidance but in selecting the most qualified supplier. Calgon Carbon Corporation is a solid American company that has made significant environmental contributions to California's water issues. We are committed to the community of Orange County and believe,that as an engineering company,our proven NOMA technology will provide the best performance backed by a financially strong company. Best regards, Charles Drewry Regional Sales Manager CC:Bruce Chalmers,Bill Everest,David Murray 3 Groundwater `w:0 Replenishment System April 9, 2002 Mr. Charles Drewry Calgon Carbon Corporation, Inc. 2890 West Oasis Road Tucson, AZ 85742 Subject: UV Light Equipment Pre-selection Groundwater Replenishment System Dear Mr. Drewry: This letter is written in response to the letter received from Calgon Carbon Corporation, Inc. dated March 1, 2002 requesting the Orange County Water District to consider certain issues pertaining to the pre-selection of the subject equipment. Our responses are grouped in the following categories: • Consistency with current equipment • Technical and economic factors • Financial stability of respondents Consistency with Current Equipment: Your letter infers several benefits related to consistency between the existing and proposed Calgon equipment. However, the Calgon proposed equipment is of different size, orientation and style compared to the Calgon UV tower currently in operation at Water Factory 21. Technical and Economic Factors Your letter states that several factors are not included in the life-cycle cost (LCC) analysis used to select the UV equipment manufacturer. These include: 1) Operator training costs; 2) Replacement lamp discounts; 3) Technical design criteria; 4) Installation costs; 5) Maintenance costs; and 6) American-based company. Each of these items were considered when preparing the pre-selection documents, but did not warrant inclusion in the specific LCC analysis criteria. Operator training costs are a minor expense for either manufacturer. Replacement lamp costs were considered in the LCC analysis; the present worth (PW) of Calgon's lamp replacement costs were tower than Trojan's; however, the total PW cost (used for selection) for Calgon was $2.4 million higher than Trojan's (12% higher), considering all costs for power consumption, lamp replacement and ballast replacement. The technical design criteria issues listed in the letter (and labeled as "non-compliance issues") have been addressed in the Trojan proposal to OCWD's satisfaction. Installation costs, both electrical and structural costs, and maintenance costs are not significantly different between the manufacturers, and therefore were not included in the LCC analysis. Funding for the project from grants and loans are not affected by buying non-American products. A pm[effort of the O.M Cnuntq Whly Nm one ne 0mnpe C.mry Sw..,N. (714) 378-3200 • Fax(714) 378-3381 - 10500 Ellis A.cnue • Faumain Valley - Gllfornia 92700 Response to March 1, 2002 Calgon Letter Page 2 of 2 Financial Stability of Respondents In evaluating the proposals for responsiveness, consideration was given to the financial standing of both Trojan and Calgon. Although Trojan has incurred a net loss during the period 1999-2001, as stated in your letter, Calgon also incurred a net loss ($13,729,000) in 1999, according to the 2000 Annual Report included in your proposal. We also reviewed Trojan's first quarter 2002 report, which indicates the following: 1) small net loss ($0.02 per share); 2) expected second quarter revenue of $22 million; and 3) selection by City of Seattle of Trojan equipment for a 180 mgd drinking water disinfection system (largest in the world). Review of Trojan's second quarter results (period ending February 28, 2002) indicate a strong financial tumaround, based on the following: 1. Second quarter revenue of$22.7 million (52% increase), an annual equivalent of $91 million; 2. Second quarter net income of $1.1 million ($0.06 per share compared to a $0.05 per share loss last year); 3. Retirement of all short-term indebtedness; 4. Positive cash flow; and 5. Backlog exceeding $40 million (not including the GWR System project) In addition, Trojan has successfully met the performance bonding requirements delineated in the contract documents. We are satisfied with the financial viability of Trojan to successfully meet the project requirements. Based on the proposal evaluation stated in Article 18 of Section 00200 and in accordance with Section 00310 of the specifications, the recommendation of award will remain Trojan Technologies. Thank you for your time and effort in submitting a proposal for the Groundwater Replenishment System Ultraviolet Disinfection and Oxidation System. Sincerely, z6l�v William R. Everest, P.E. Associate General Manager Orange County Water District lip I:Qocvmeni KMGM SySFiW to Mar t Upri It la94zE cc: Thomas Dawes, OCWD Dave Ludwin, OCSD Clark Ide, OCWD Brad Hogin, OCSD Mehul Patel, OCWD Bruce Chalmers, CON! Wendy Sevenandt, OCSD Dave Murray, Brown and Caldwell Christian Williamson, Trojan Tech. Bob Finn, Brown and Caldwell LORETTA SANCHEZ • a.x Ps,wc..C.wravu l 1 •• 7 w•Ewr6,yx ama 1230 IOHGWORIH e,jIW,, COMMITTEE ON `I \+^ WASHINETOX.W=Slfi 5Ca EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE 1202I225.E965 $ummrrtu: 12021 225.5059 FAX EEVCATWN REFORM O el WORWONCE MTECnONS 12297 LFMS STREET.HIRE 11, YIECTEWCAT'N (Congress of the United ;§tales cAAOFH CRovE,u9xBa0.Aan COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES I)lAl S11L102 PIAI B11M01 FAX www Xxx...exxt.xXwE 9ARam N 5. uuse of iRe}treseuttstiues M14TMYfl ARCXpNp OEVR.OPMFNT ""MGHT° N '19tui mEC1Al OVERSIGHT PANRgNEL O ON TERRORISM lio1 g'Jton. WE20515-0546 April 18, 2002 Mr. Iry Pickier OCWD Board of Directors Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dew Mr. Pickier: It has recently been brought to my attention that a series of contracts for the Ground Water Replenishment System(GWRS)haveland or will be awarded to international firms headquartered in France and Canada. Based on my records,the GWRS is being funded by federal,state, and local tax dollars. With construction and development costs expected to exceed $350 million dollars, I believe it is in the best interest of our economic health to award future contracts to US firms, especially in light of the recent economic downturn. Although signs of an economic slowdown began to surface in early 2001, September 11 placed an undue burden on our business community,residents, and families. As our economy is now showing signs of recovery,there is no better time than now to put American tax dollars back into the national economy. The potential benefit to national and regional tech companies, suppliers,contractors,and laborers is enormous. Furthermore,the events of the last 8 months have given rise to security concerns regarding our nation's infrastructure. I firmly believe that the construction of any project that directly impacts our entire community should remain under the jurisdiction of US firms.The GWRS clearly meets this criteria—the project will ultimately provide water service for 2.8 million Orange County residents. I respectfully urge that you give this request your highest consideration. If you have further questions or require additional information,please do not hesitate to contact my District Director,Raul Luna, at 714-621-0102. Verytrul VA, Y Yoe+ cTG� Loretta anchez Member of Congress $�L� mw MIMEUOX REGY4Ea FARp w®x b. Agenda Item 98 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: April 22, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501.4030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: N/A From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: NIA Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes, Bill Everest Subject: ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT UPDATE SUMMARY In March 2002, the JCC approved and recommended to the Boards of Directors that Trojan Technologies be selected to provide ultraviolet light (UV) disinfection equipment for the GWR System. Both Boards deferred the item back to staff. The OCSD Board requested that staff address a letter issued by Calgon Carbon Corporation dated March 1, 2002. Staff has addressed the issues in a response letter dated April 9, 2002 to Calgon Carbon Corporation. Staff has not changed their recommendation to select Trojan Technologies as the UV equipment manufacturer for the GWR System. The OCSD Board will act on approving Trojan Technologies as the UV equipment manufacturer at their April 24, 2002 meeting. The action before the Board is to award a $250,000 contract to Trojan Technologies for engineering design documents at this time and assign the purchase of UV equipment to construction contracts. The construction contracts will be brought to the JCC and Boards when the designs are complete and the contracts are ready to bid. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS In October 2001, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Board of Directors authorized issuance of a Request for Proposals for the pre-selection of ultraviolet light equipment estimated at $10,250,000, and granted authority to the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors to award a contract for equipment design in the amount of$250,000, and also granted authority to the OCWD Board of Directors to assign the value of equipment to construction contracts for installation. - 1 - Agenda Item #8 The request for proposals was sent to four firms specializing in ultraviolet (UV) disinfection equipment and two proposals were received. Proposals were received from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies on February 27, 2002. Both were over the engineer's estimate of$10,250,000 when tax is included in the total cost. This item was brought before the OCSD Board of Directors in March because the lowest proposed cost exceeded the engineer's estimate. Trojan Technologies proposes the lowest capital cost of$10,439,990.61 with tax included at 7.75% and the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of $20,253,000. With approval by the Boards of Directors, a contract in the amount of$250,000 will be awarded to Trojan Technologies for engineering design documents. The value of the UV disinfection equipment as proposed by Trojan Technologies will be assigned to the demonstration unit construction contractor and the permanent facilities construction contractor. These contracts are scheduled for bid and award in the summer of 2002 and spring of 2003. These installation contracts will be brought before the Joint Cooperative Committee and the OCSD and OCWD Board of Directors in accordance with the adopted procedures that will be in effect at that time. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS October 8, 2002, March 11, 2002. Attachment - 2 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetln9Date To.81 os/ E AGENDA REPORT of IhsnNumbe IemN�mier v Orange county Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Robyn Wilcox, Project Manager SUBJECT: FIBER OPTICS EXTENSION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. SP2000-61 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve plans and specifications for Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a Construction Contract to Manuel Bros., Inc. for Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61, for an amount not to exceed $243,500. SUMMARY • This project is an extension to the backbone fiber optic network cabling at Plant No. 2. • Plans and specifications for the Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-61,were completed in February 2002. Tran Consulting Engineers performed the design. • Addendum No. 1 was issued on April 29, 2002 including the revised routing to accommodate the proposed Temporary Disinfection Project Sodium Bisulfate Tanks. The Addendum added the fiber line that was not included in the original bid document. • The plans and specifications were bid on May 7, 2002. Project Budget $403,000 Construction Budget $325,000 Engineers Estimate $325,000 Low Responsible Bid $243,500 High Bid $368,000 Number of Bids 3 • The Director of Engineering recommends award of the Construction Contract to Manuel Bros., Inc. far an amount not to exceed $243,500. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization is being requested $243,500 for Construction Contract Budget and $10,000 for Construction Management and Staff time. See the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 8, Page 151) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Plant No. 2 is in need of a redundant fiber optic line along the perimeter of the plant which will service a number of recently constructed and upcoming projects, including the sampler building, Outfall Flowmeter, Sodium Bisulfate Tanks for Temporary Disinfection, and existing facilities including the Surge Towers. This project will add approximately 3,500 feet of concrete-encased conduit and fiber, and instrument panels to the South end of Plant No. 2, with the intention of future connection to the north end fiber optic facilities. This will ensure that the plant has necessary redundancy for its Instrumentation & Control (I&C) and monitoring programs along the east side of Plant No. 2. The size of the fiber optic cable to be installed will also ensure that the Orange County Sanitation District does not have to install parallel facilities to accommodate future needs. ALTERNATIVES No other cost-effective alternatives have been identified. Reliable fiber optic cabling is necessary for instrumentation, control, and monitoring of all Plant No. 2 Facilities. CEQA FINDINGS This project was not included in a previously approved Master Plan/EIR. This Project is exempt per CEQA Guideline Section 15302 for Facilities Engineering Projects at Plant No. 2. A Notice of Exemption was filed on November 22, 2000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation 3. Bid Summary RW:jo:sa G:\wp.dwa pendaS9 W Agenda Repw1e12002 Bwm Agenda Reporwo502V 17.SP200MI.Coc Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Fiber Optics Extension at Plant No. 2 JOB No. SP2000-61 V,I NAWR 1, P iwo W Pmject Development StudnWPemiffing Consultant PSA $ 25,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 20.000 . $ 20.000 $ 5,089 25% Design Staff $ 5.000 $ 50,000 $ 60,000. $ 50.000 — $ 50,000 $ 44.745 89% Construeflon Contract $ 100,000 $ 326.000 $ 325,000 lr: $ 243,500 $ 243,500 0% Construction Administraflonnnspeclion $ 5.000 $ 8,000 $ 8.000 $8,000 $ 8.000 $ 1,280 16% Contingency PROJECTTOTAL $ 135.000 $ 403.000 $ 403,000 $ 70,000 $ 251,500 $ 321,500 $ 51.114 18% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 135,000 $ 403.000 $ - $ 403,000 $ 70,000 251,500 $ 321,500 $ 51,114 16% g, vp.dWw0720"mWoWft kesSudpi Into T.We M SP2000A2 M2202 May 7, 2002 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NO. 1 BID TABULATION FIBER OPTICS EXTENSION AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. SP2000-61 Engineer's Estimate: $300,000 Construction Contract Budget: $325,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Manuel Bros., Inc. $ 243,500 2. Mike Prlich & Sons, Inc. $ 278,500 3. Ark Construction Co. $ 368,000 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to MANUEL BROS., INC., in the bid amount of$243,500 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering CAFIIaNeVNIP15P2000-61 Bid Tab.doc Revised 05/19/98 OCSO . P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain valley,CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY FIBER OPTICS EXTENSION AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. SP2000-61 Manuel Bros. Inc. Mike Prllch and Sons Ark Construction Item Approx, Qty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 $200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 231,000.00 $ 231,000.00 $ 86,500.00 $ 86,500.00 $348,000.00 $348,000.00 I $868;000 0-0 'Add (+)or Delete(-) $ - $ (8,000.00) °:::I�t::.s.,i,, , I .$ 243,500:00 $ 276;50b:00;; $368,000.00', Memel Bros,Inc. f Mike Prllch and Sons Ark Construction H:\wp.dtalenOVormslBid DOcs1SP2OOO61 Sid Summary 2.xls 1 of 1 5/7/02 BOARD OF DIRECTOR$ M"Ung Date To ad.or Dlr. osi2yo2 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item lam to Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-84 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to plans and specifications for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3)Award a construction contract to Green Giant Landscape, Inc. for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-84, for an amount not to exceed $400,426. SUMMARY • This project is required to comply with the City of Huntington Beach, Plant No. 2, Coastal Development permit and the Urban Design Element of the 1999 Strategic Plan. • The purpose of this project is to shield views of Plant No. 2 from Pacific Coast Highway as effectively as possible given restrictions imposed by the California Department of Fish and Game. • The plans and specifications for Job No. P2-84 were completed in April 2002 and bid on April 23, 2002. Addendum No. 1 was issued to revise the contractor's license requirements to allow specialty landscaping contractors to bid the project. Current Project Budget $810,000 Construction Budget $460,000 Engineer's 100% Design Estimate $458,144 Low Responsive Bid $400,426 High Bid $668,000 Number of Bids 3 The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to Green Giant Landscape, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $400,426. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Seethe attached Budget Information Table. Authorization of$80,000 is being requested for construction, administration, and inspection and $400,426 for the construction contract. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:section s-Page 145) ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The overall budget total remains unchanged. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In 1996, the Orange County Sanitation District (District) was issued a Coastal Development Permit for the replacement of Surge Tower No. 1 and the City Water Pump Station located at Plant No. 2. The permit required that the District prepare a plan that provides for additional landscaping along the Pacific Coast Highway(PCH) side of the facility. The plan was required to provide for landscaping improvements that shield views of Plant No. 2 from PCH as effectively as possible, given restrictions imposed by the Department of Fish and Game (DFBG) and constraints resulting from the plant infrastructure, both above and below ground. The plan was required to be completed at the conclusion of the Strategic Plan or June of 1998, which ever occurred sooner. Implementation of the plan was to commence immediately thereafter. In October 2000, the District issued a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)to Borthwick, Guy and Bettenhausen for final design and services during construction for landscaping and irrigation at Plant No. 2. During final design, the project concept was discussed with the City of Huntington Beach and the DFBG who are the main stakeholders. The concept was approved by the stakeholders and presented at a City of Huntington Beach Council Meeting. Design features include: • Two undulating mounds approximately 11 feet high utilizing a manufactured soil retention system along the ocean facing boundary of Plant No. 2, between Brookhurst Avenue and the dissolved air flotation thickeners. • Native vegetation on top and sides of the mounds and at the base of the mounds between the Plant No. 2 boundary and the bike path. • A series of fluted concrete panels to add aesthetic appeal and provide further screening to the public. • Green vinyl clad fencing between the dissolved air flotation thickeners and the secondary clarifiers. Vines will grow on the fencing to provide additional screening. This design maximizes the screening height within the available area and eliminates the potential for raptors to threaten endangered species that inhabit the adjacent Talbert Marsh. G:%p dNUpeMaVlvrd Ap �.r2W22 rd RV.r✓•A.Wt Z' Nlm10 P3$n.Ea R... WOV Page 2 In April 2002, the District opened three bids for the Landscape and Irrigation Project at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84. The following summarizes the submitted bids: Contractor Total Bid Green Giant Landscape, Inc. $400,426 Terra-Cal Construction, Inc. $635,250 Ark Construction Company $668,000 Staff recommended award of a construction contract to Green Giant Landscape, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $400,426. ALTERNATIVES Do not award the construction contract. Not awarding the contract would mean that the Orange County Sanitation District would not be able to meet the visual screening required by the Coastal Permit. CEQA FINDINGS Addendum No. 2 to the Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J-40-5, was received and filed by the Board of Directors on December 19, 2001. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Summary 3. Bid Tabulation PK:sa:jo G1wpAtatagendeXBoard Agenda Repurb'2002 Board Agenda ReporlsWS02UMm IO.P2.84.dw 6.MdNNpmONBovN�eepw,tl2Wd a AWM WaNWhft m18.P2-01dx n, W: eame, Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2 JOB NO. P2-84 PROJECiTTAI V. Project Development $ 9,000 $ 8,000 $ B.000 S 8.152 $ 8,152 $ 8.152 100% StudieslPernnifling 5 16,000 $ 9000 $ 9,000 $ 9.000 $ 9.000 $ 4,513 50% Consultant PSA $ 85,000 $ 139.095 $ 139,095 $ 139,095 $ 139,095 $ 129,577 93% Design Staff $ 20.000 $ 47.905 $ 47.905 S 47,905 $ 47,905 $ 24.633 51% Construction Contract $ 420.000 $ 460,000 $ 460,000 $ 7,000 $ 400.426 $ 407426 $ 861 0% Construction Administration $ 50.000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50.1300 $ 50,000 $ 450 1% Construction Inspection $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Contingency $ 180000 $ 66,000 $ 66,000 Reimbursable Costs ]TOTAL Is 810,000 1 $ 810,000 $ $ 810.000 $ 211 152 $ 480,4261 $ 691,578 S 168,186 1 24% h%"dmNnq1'obs&t Imctsti,2-BM,2 M budget Inrom bcn Woe REVISED 5/2/02 D April 23. 2002 11:00 a.m. ADDENDUM NOA BID TABULATION LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2.84 Engineers Estimate: $453,0110 Construction Contract Budget: $460,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Green Giant Landscape, Inc. $ 400,426 2. Terra-Cal Construction, Inc. $ 635,250 3. Ark Construction Co. $ 668,000 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to GREEN GIANT LANDSCAPE, INC. in the bid amount of$400,426 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering CAFIleNeWlPlP2-84 Bid TabAdc Revised 05119/98 OCSD . P.O.Box 8127 . Fmnlain Valley,CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411 BID SUMMARY LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-84 GREEN GIANT LANDSCAPE INC. TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION INC. ARK CONSTRUCTION CO. Item Approx. oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5.000.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 395,426.00 $ 395.426.00 $ 625,650.00 $ 625,650.00 $658,000.00 $ 658,000.00 '.' :'cc $ 41bd,0 9 'Add (+)or Delete(-) $ - ... TiY 40d,42t i00 85:260 90: $ 6681GA0:00 GREEN GIANT LANDSCAPE INC. 1 TERRACALCONSTRUCTION INc. ARK CONSTRUCTION CO. C:WlIeNeIWIPI P2-e4 Bid Summary 2.x1si$heel2 1 of 1 4/23/02 FAHIR COMMITTEE MeeOSen9/OB/02 Date T06E.O D1r. OS/22/02 AGENDA REPORT Itm Number" Item Num e ber FAHR02-06 19 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES, PERMIT USER CHARGES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES FOR 2002-03 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-18, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Adopting Sewer Service Charges; Adopting Capital Facilities Connection Charges; Establishing Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Dischargers, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers; and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-15. SUMMARY Last month the Committee considered this action in concept. Tonights action is to actually recommend the fees to the Board for adoption. In 1997, the Directors of the eight separate Districts each adopted a 5-year schedule of annual sanitary sewer service charges through the 2001-02 fiscal year. Beginning with 2000-01, these previously adopted rates were set aside, but not rescinded, in some of the service areas and a uniform rate was implemented. That basic rate for 2001-02 was $80 per year for a single-family residence, and other users are charged a percentage of that rate based upon quantity and strength of the average wastewater discharge. Preliminary budget analysis for 2002-03 indicates a fee of$87.50 will be sufficient to meet our cash flow needs. This will be an increase in fees for Revenue Areas 2, 3, 6 and 7, and a recapture of a portion of previously implemented, but set aside fees in Revenue Areas 1, 5, 11 and 13. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY General User Fee revenue for 2002-03 is expected to be approximately $78 million, a 9.7%G increase from the current year as a result of these rates and service area growth. The County Tax Collector-Treasurer charges us for a copy of the database, updates, and for minor programming. The County Auditor charges us, via deduction from fees collected,for the actual collection expenses. Annual collection costs are approximately $220,000 or.3% of the sewer service fees. G%"dlalgenda�wrd Apen6 RepWS�003 Vwrd Agent ReWftb WZUM 19.Mer Fee OM1, —dm Rem-d erzM Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION General Users and Backaround In 1997, the individual District Boards of Directors adopted multi-year Sewer Service User Fee Rates. These rate schedules were confirmed during the consolidation process through 2001-02. In 2000, the Directors voted to complete the consolidation by combining the books of account for the various Revenue Areas, except RA7 and RA14, and implementing a single sewer service charge. In order not to raise annual fees for any user above those previously adopted, the appropriate rates for 2000-01 and 2001-02 became those previously adopted by RA3. These rates are based upon the single-family residential rate of$78 per year. (Rates for other types of users are based upon average flow and strength assumptions, type of user and building size.) It is important to note that this action did not replace those higher rates that were adopted in some areas in 1997. They were only set aside until such time as they may again become the appropriate rates for that area. Setting aside, rather than rescinding these higher rates, will allow the District to re-implement them at a later date, If appropriate, without repeating the Proposition 218 notification and hearing process that was conducted when the rate structure was revised subsequent to the Rate Advisory Committee public participation process. Because of other governance and service issues that remain unresolved, the Board decided not to include Revenue Area 7 in this rate consolidation. Therefore, the 2000-01 rates for RA7 were those that were previously adopted by District 7 and confirmed by the 1998 consolidation. However, for 2001-02 and 2002-03 the base rate, the single family-residential rate adopted for RA7, is the same as the rate adopted for the rest of the service area. Non-Residential and Permit Users In 1998, after the Rate Advisory Committee process, the Board adopted a revised user fee rate structure. A focal point of this structure was that the non-residential rates become based upon wastewater flow and strength per 1,000 square feet of development, rather than the same flat rate for all non-residential users. In 2000, the Directors adopted a rate calculation methodology that would standardize the constituent rates (Flow, BOD, and SS)for these permit users so that they are consistent with the rates used for the general user. The proposed 2002-03 rates are based upon the single-family residential sewer service user fee and the actual costs to treat Flow, BOD and SS follow: G\.Al¢bwd.�dAOenM R.0 =02B WA,e Rapa'.WWZIWp 18.U»1 F..OM.n.nwd. R ..d: MOW Page 2 c D=.Permk Po User Flow Per Me BOD Per 1,0008 S$ 10009 ulVelaM Class l and 11 $282.92 $1go.65 $164.55 07.50 spedal Pwpose Discharge Penft $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 $87.50 If the Directors choose to implement the previously adopted sanitary sewer service charges and to continue this calculation methodology for permit users, then a proposed Ordinance will be submitted at a later meeting. The General Counsel has ruled that these charges for service are not subject to the Proposition 218 notification process. Capital Facilities Caoacity Charge The charge new development pays to connect to our sewerage system through a local sewer is called a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC). The existing rates were developed as a part of the Rate Advisory Committee process during the adoption of the 1999 Strategic Plan. The rates for residential and non-residential development are based upon the average projected system demand for that type of user. The rates are designed to capture the costs of existing facilities and new capacity that should be allocated to new users. In 2000, the Committee recommended and the Board approved a policy that maintains the CFCC rates for the years between Master Plan or Strategic Plan updates. The theory behind that action was that only at that time did we revise our total capital improvement program and the future total number of users. Since the Strategic Plan will not be changed until after the start of the 2002-03 fiscal year, staff is recommending that the CFCC rates remain unchanged. ALTERNATIVES • Maintain existing fees for 2002-03 pending determination of level of treatment and NPDES permit. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Preliminary Cash Flow 2. Draft Ordinance GGS:Ic G\rq 4W,.nd.� AlIft FepvL VMB WA,.�Q%Vt.N 19.U15 F.ON,..d. RNI.d. WWI Page 3 ORDINANCE NO. OCSD 18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES; ADOPTING CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES; ESTABLISHING MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS; AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-15 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ("District") has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-15, establishing annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for all uses, which Ordinance is presently in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-15, establishing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges to be imposed when properties either newly-connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-15, establishing miscellaneous industrial discharger fees, source control/non-compliance sampling fees, and wastehauler charges; and WHEREAS, for purposes of improved efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations, it is the intent, by the adoption of this Ordinance, to re-enact the existing Ordinances that establish fees and charges, into one comprehensive, master Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I: RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01, Findings — Declaration of Intent ARTICLE II: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01, Purpose and Scope Section 2.02, Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge WS85—TLW:pi:#151421:05/07/02:Rev.3.CLEAN 1 Section 2.03 A. Exemptions B. Application for Rebate C. Application for Refund D. Limitation Period E. Determination F. Administrative Fee Section 2.04, Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year Section 2.05, Method of Collection Section 2.06, Credit for Industrial Permittees Table A Annual Sewer Service Charges for Residential Users Table B Annual Sewer Service Charges Property Use Classifications for Commercial or Industrial Users ARTICLE III: CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES Section 3.01, Purpose and Scope Section 3.02, Definitions Section 3.03, Connection Permits: Required Section 3.04, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Section 3.05, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment Section 3.06, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts Section 3.07, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial — Industrial Users— Special Purpose Dischargers— Definitions Section 3.08, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial — Industrial Users Section 3.09, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Purpose Dischargers Section 3.10, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users— Special Purpose Dischargers Table C Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Section 3.11, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Section 3.12, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Section 3.13, Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements WS&S-TLW:pj:#151421:05/07/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 2 Section 3.14, No Refund or Transfer Section 3.15, Baseline Transferability Table D Capital Facilities Capacity Charges ARTICLE IV: MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01, Purpose and Scope Section 4.02, Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees Section 4.03, Industrial Discharger, Source Control, and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Section 4.04, Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use Section 4.05, Class I and Class II Permittees— Charges for Use Section 4.06,Wastehauler Charges for Use Section 4.07, Administrative Appeals Table E Administrative Fees and Charges Relating To Permittees Table F Industrial Discharger, Source Control and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Table G Class I and Class II Permittees and Special Purpose Discharge Permittees Charges For Use Table H Wastehauler Charges for Use ARTICLE V: MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01, Application of Ordinance Section 5.02, Exceptions Section 5.03, Severability Section 5.04, Effective Date Section 5.05, Repeal Section 5.06, Certification and Publication ARTICLE I RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01. Findings—Declaration of Intent. The Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Master Plans, as more particularly described in Findings B, C. D, and E below, setting forth the financial and engineering needs of the District, and hereby adopts the following Findings supporting the amounts of charges and fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. WS&S-TLW:pj:R151421.10W1/02:Ro.3-CLEAN 3 A. That the former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California (the "Predecessor Districts"), were nine individual County Sanitation Districts, organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Section 4700 at seq.). By action of the Board of Directors of the Predecessor Districts, pursuant to specific legislation enacted by the California State Legislature in 1996, an application was submitted to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission to legally consolidate the nine Predecessor Districts into one single Sanitation District for all purposes. The application was approved, with an effective date of July 1, 1998. As of July 1, 1998, the Predecessor Districts ceased to exist, and one single consolidated County Sanitation District, known as the Orange County Sanitation District, came into existence in place of the Predecessor Districts. The District was formed to carry on the functions of the Predecessor Districts. B. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities, entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan — 1989", hereinafter referred to as the "Master Plan",which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, was prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, setting forth and identifying the required future development of District Facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the individual service areas of each of the nine Predecessor Districts. C. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan were made available to the public, both prior to and subsequent to the adoption of the Master Plan, and were subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 66016, and other provisions of law. D. That the Predecessor Districts, during the years 1997 and 1998, commenced comprehensive planning, engineering, and financial studies to develop an updated Comprehensive Master Plan of Capital Facilities, which studies are referred to as the District's "Strategic Plan", which was approved and adopted by the Resolution No. 99-21 of Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. E. That the District, in 1997, as part of its Strategic Plan studies, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain access to the system. F. That the financial requirements of the District, as shown in reports prepared by Staff and Consultants relating to the Strategic Plan, are based on current, reliable information and data relating to population projections, WSBS—TLW:pIl:M151421:05107/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 4 wastewater flow, and capital facilities' needs, and are expected to be realized in each year as described in the reports. G. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the sewage collection, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and to assist in the payment of costs to the District to provide all regulatory administration and laboratory services related to the industrial dischargers, source control pennittees, and wastehauler users of the District's systems. H. That the owners or occupants of properties upon which all fees and charges established by this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process. I. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public health and safety, and to preserve the environment without damage. J. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established and levied by this Ordinance are to allow the District to recover the reasonable costs to provide a service to individual parcels of real property which have been improved for any of numerous types of uses. The basis for the respective charge is the request of the owner of a parcel, for the benefit of hindher/dself, or the occupants of the property, to receive a service based upon actual use, consumption, and disposal of water to the District's system in lieu of disposal by other means. K. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance are not imposed as a condition of approval of a development project, as defined in California Government Code Section 66001, and do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016 and California Constitution Article XIIID. L. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these Sanitary Sewer Service Charges will not result in any specific project, nor result in a direct physical change in the environment. WSSS-TLW:pI:#151421:05/07/02:RV.3-CLEAN 5 M. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities provided to each new customer to the District, a portion of which are necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes to the State General Fund as a result of state legislative action on September 2, 1992, and in subsequent years. N. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinances, commencing in 1969, and most recently by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, established Capital Facilities Connection Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges" or"Fees", to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system. Said Charges are required as a financial payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the system, and for future facilities to be constructed. 0. That the District's previous and present Capital Facilities Connection Charges Ordinances, include[d] authority for the District to levy an excess or supplemental capacity charge upon commercial and industrial users who discharge quantities or high strength wastewater greater than the established base line of authorized discharge. P. That the Capital Facilities Connection Charges re-enacted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property by the District within a given category. Q. That the miscellaneous charges and fees re-enacted by this Ordinance are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged to each industrial discharger, source control permittee, or wastehauler and the service and facilities provided to each. R. That the District is required by federal and state law, including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, at seq.), the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 C.F.R. 403), and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code Sections 13000 at seq.)to implement and enforce a program for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the District's sewers. S. That the District is required by federal, state and local law, to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality. T. That pursuant to these requirements, the Board of Directors has adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations. WSBS-TLW:p14151421:05107/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 6 U. That the District incurs additional costs in conducting non- compliance sampling of those industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations and in administering the industrial, wastehauler, and special discharge permit programs. V. That Ordinance No OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, provides that the Board of Directors is to establish various fees and charges to recover those costs to the District which are made necessary by industrial dischargers and wastehaulers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. W. That the industrial discharger, source control, and wastehauler fees and charges hereby established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to the District of industrial discharger, source control, or wastehauler use of the District's facilities and for the administration and implementation of permit and fee processing, non-compliance sampling, and related services associated with the District's Source Control Program. X. That all fees and charges established herein have been approved by the District's Board of Directors at a public meeting, all in accordance with applicable provisions of law. Y. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). Z. That each of the Findings set forth in previous Ordinances Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSDA 1, OCSDA3, and OCSCD-15 are reaffirmed and readopted hereat, except to the extent that they have been specifically superseded or otherwise amended by specific Findings herein. ARTICLE II SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish Sanitary Sewer Service Charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and WS&5—TLW:pj:#151421:05107/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 7 reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 2.02. Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance, the owner of each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial, or industrial use and which, at the request of the owner or the owner's predecessor-in-interest, is connected to the District's system, shall pay an annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge based on the respective class of users, in the sum or sums, as set forth in Tables A and B of this Ordinance, both attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for residential users are set forth in Table A. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for commercial or industrial users are dependent upon the respective classifications of property use, determined by reference to Table B; the applicable percentage figure shown on Table B with respect to the particular use classification is multiplied by the applicable single family residential rate shown in Table A, to arrive at the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. Table A establishes separate rates with respect to each of the nine Revenue Areas, with the exception of Revenue Area No. 14, as to which costs are paid by the Irvine Ranch Water District. Section 2.03. A. Exemotions. It is the intent of the District that the legal owner(s)of parcels of real property, otherwise subject to the levy and payment of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, as prescribed herein, be relieved, in whole or in part, from the payment of said charges, in certain circumstances and under conditions prescribed herein, and be entitled to either a rebate or a refund with respect to charges paid, as more specifically set forth in Subparagraphs 2.03B and 2.03C below, provided an inequity is established or a billing error is proven, as specified in Subparagraphs B or C. B. AmAcation for Rebate. Any property owner may apply to the District for a rebate of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that an unfair valuation of the property has been made by the District. An applicant for a rebate must establish, by proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that an inequity exists between the amount of the charge paid and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system, resulting in an unfair valuation. Satisfactory proof shall establish that either: (1) The principal water use is agricultural or horticultural; or (2) The property is devoted to any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. WSBS—TLW:pj:#151421:05/07/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 8 Satisfactory proof shall include, but not be limited to, documentation showing actual water usage for each billing cycle during the entire period for which the rebate is sought. The amount of any rebate shall not reduce the charge payable by any property owner, whose property is connected to the District's system, to less than the single family residential charge shown on the applicable Table attached hereto. C. ADWication for Refund. Any property owner may apply to the District for a refund of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that the amount paid was pursuant to an error in the amount billed or the amount paid. The applicant for a refund must submit proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that a billing error has been made by the District, or the County Tax Collector. Such proof shall include, but not be limited to, proof that: (1) The owner's parcel of property is not connected to the District's system; or (2) The property has not been classified in the proper land use category; or (3) A clerical error has been made. D. Limitations Period. Applications for rebates and refunds shall be deemed to be governed by the provisions of California Revenue& Taxation Code Sections 5096 and 5097, allowing for refunds for a period of four(4)years from the date of payment of the second installment of the bill claimed to be either inequitable or incorrect. E. Determination. All applications for rebates or refunds of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge will be determined by the General Manager of the District, or his designee, who, based on the submitted proof, may grant a full or partial rebate or refund. F. Administrative Fee. At the time of filing the application for rebate or refund, the property owner shall pay District an administrative fee for the processing of such application. The amount of the fee shall be equal to the total of all fees and charges imposed on the District by any other public entity, such as the Orange County Tax Collector, the Orange County Auditor, or the Orange County Recorder, in connection with the rebate or refund. Section 2.04. Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance shall be effective as of July 1 of each year, as set forth in Tables A and B, attached hereto, for the District's fiscal year, and shall remain in effect until such time as the rates adopted herein are WSBS—TLW:pj:#151421:05/07/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 9 changed by District Ordinance. There shall be no proration of such charges in any fiscal year. Section 2.05. Method of Collection. A. Pursuant to the authority granted by California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, and except as otherwise provided in Subparagraph 2.05E below, all sanitary sewer service charges established herein shall be collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with, and not separately from, its general taxes. The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to make said collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements between the County of Orange and the District. B. In the event District determines that, due to billing or payment error, or to inequity in the amount billed, a property owner has underpaid annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges payable to District, District, within four (4) years after the date of mailing of the tax bill, may: (1) collect the amount of any deficiency directly on the County Tax Roll; (2) off-set the amount of any deficiency against any amounts that District determines is owing, by District, to the property owner, as a rebate or refund under this Ordinance; or (3) submit, directly to the property owner, a bill for the amount of any deficiency, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the invoice date and which, if not paid, shall become a lien on said property. Section 2.06. Credit for Industrial Permittees. A credit shall be allowed to all dischargers permitted pursuant to Article 3 of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, in an amount equal to the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge established by Section 2.02 of this Ordinance, in the same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Sections 302.6(B), and 303.6(B)of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. WS&5-TLW:pj#151421:05/07/02:Rw.3-CLEAN 10 TABLE A ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL USERS Single Family Residential Rates 2002-03 Adopted SFR Consolidated Revenue Areas $87.50 Revenue Area No. 7 $87.50 Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the Irvine Ranch Water District Multi-Family Residential Rates Per Unit 2002-03 Adopted MFR Consolidated Revenue Areas $61.25 Revenue Area No. 7 $61.25 Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area No. 14 Costs Are Paid Directly by the Irvine Ranch Water District Wa85-TLW:pj:k151421:05107/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 11 TABLE B ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1.000 SF or Unit 1 Vacant Land Parcel 0% 5 Common Area Parcel 0% 6 "Hold" Parcel 0% 8 Equivalent to Vacant 0% 121 Parcel of Minimal or No Value 0% 122 Subsurface Parcels 0% 124 Oil/Mineral Rights 0% 125 Mineral Rights Equipment 0% 126 Vacant Comm. Area-IMP Alloc. 0% 201 Homeowners Exemption Addl. 0% 666 Unassigned Vacant 0% 777 Septic Tank Property 0% 112 Steel Building 7% 113 Mini-Warehouse 7% 58 Nurseries (Plants) 10% 100 Drive-In Theater 10% 44 Lumber/Constr. Material Yard 17% 71 Parking Garage 17% 72 Paved Parking Lot 17% 110 Warehouse—Single Tenant 17% 111 Warehouse— Multi Tenant 17% 115 Recreational Vehicle Storage 17% 116 Truck Terminal 17% 33 Church Buildings 20% 94 Department Store 23% 95 Discount Store 23% 96 Unattached Single Store 23% 97 Strip Store 23% 74 Recreational Vehicle Park 27% 36 Financial Buildings 27% 40 Health Club 29% 68 High Rise Office 30% 21 Automobile Dealership 41% 22 Auto Repair Shop 41% 23 Automotive Service 41% 24 Used Car Lot 41% 39 Golf Course 41% 57 Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building 41% 83 Automotive Service Station 41% WSBS-TLW:pj:#151421:05/07/02:Re,3-CLEAN 12 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 84 Marine Service Station 41% 86 Combin:Service Station/Convenience 41% 65 Single Office Bldgs. to 3 Stories 41% 66 Small Office Center 41% 67 Office Complex 41% 69 Converted Residence to Office 41% 7 Mobile Home 50% 55 Mobile Home Park 50% 107 Light Industrial—Single Tenant 50% 108 Light Industrial—Multi Tenant 50% 109 Research and Development 50% 114 Industrial Park 50% 37 Fraternal Buildings 51% 101 Unattached Theater 51% 26 Airport and Related Buildings 53% 45 Marinas 53% 88 Low Flow Shopping Center 53% 3 Two or More Residences 70% 10 Duplex Only 70% 11 Triplex Only 70% 12 04-Units Only 70% 13 5 to 16 Units 70% 14 17 to 25 Units 70% 15 26 to 40 Units Only 70% 16 41-99 Units Only 70% 17 100 or More Units 70% 18 Developed with a Mix of Forms 70% 63 Low Rise Retirement Building 70% 64 High Rise Retirement Building 70% 81 Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care 82% 82 Private Schools 82% 98 Store with Offices or Living Quarter 82% 99 Store with Office Upstairs 82% 118 Governmental Use VacentfDevelop. 82% 19 SFR with for 2 rental units 85% 34 Dormitory 97% 42 Hospital 97% 43 Hotel 97% 56 Motels and Motor Hotels 97% WS&S—TLW:pI:p151421:05107102:Rev.3-CLEAN 13 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 0 Conversion-C/1, Rural PC 100% 2 One Residence 100% 4 Miscellaneous Improvement 100% 85 Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant 100% 103 Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage 100% 104 Food Processing Plant 100% 105 Cold Storage Plant 100% 106 Factory 100% 119 Public Utility 100% 120 Water Mutual or Company 1000/0 888 Conversion-Composite Prop. 100% 32 Cemetery & Related Buildings 101% 38 Funeral Home 101% 60 Nursing Home 102% 61 Convalescent Hospitals 102% 62 Converted Res. Used as Nursing 102% 28 Bowling Alleys 112% 92 Skating Rinks 112% 50 Single Medical Bldgs.to 3 Stories 124% 51 Small Medical Center 124% 52 Medical Center Complex 124% 53 High Rise Medical 124% 54 Converted Residence to Medical 124% 89 Average Flow Shopping Center 139% 20 Amusement Parks 144% 35 Entertainment Center 144% 73 Recreation 144% 30 Coin Operated Car Wash 151% 47 Supermarket 151% 48 Convenience Market 151% 90 High Flow Shopping Center 226% 76 Restaurant—Take Out 300% 77 Restaurant—Coffee Shop 600% 78 Restaurant— Dinner House 600% 79 Restaurant—Conversion from SF 600% 29 Conventional Car Wash 796% NOTE: Multiply the applicable percentage figure by the Table A Single Family Residential Rate for the applicable Revenue Area, in order to determine the rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. WS&S-T1_W:pj:II151421:05/07102:Re,3-CLEAN 14 " ARTICLE III CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES Section 3.01. Purpose and Scooe. The purpose of this Ordinance is to impose Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly-connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 3.02. Definitions. A. "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing, planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair. B. "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non- discriminatory charge imposed at the time a property is connected to the District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. This charge does not apply to temporary facilities or operations that are regulated under the provisions of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Connection Charge, as provided for in Sections 3.07, 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 of this Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly or annual basis, as determined by the District. C. "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to physically connect a property to the District's system, including but not limited to, installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines, and appurtenances to make the connection and which fee does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and overhead for the installation of those facilities. D. "Non-discriminatory" means that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non-public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the proportionate share of use of those facilities. WSBS—TLW:pJ:p151421:05/07/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 15 E. "Public agency" means the United States or any of its agencies, the State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of California, a county, city, district, school district, local or regional public authority, or any other political entity, subdivision or public corporation of the State. Section 3.03. Connection Permits: Required. A. Connection permits are required of all dwelling units, buildings, and structures connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to the District's facilities. B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit under Sections 305— 305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01, or as amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit, as authorized above, may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. There will be a non-discriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained. Section 3.04. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant, except as provided for discharges under a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said property. Section 3.05. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge- Time of Payment. A. Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the Case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District., or if none, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. WSBS-TLW:pi:M151421:05/07/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 16 B. Upon application of any property owner seeking to connect to the District's system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California Health R Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a period of not to exceed five (5)years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property. Section 3.06. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts. Every person or entity newly-connecting any building or structure to the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the applicable category of use set forth on Table D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3.07. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial — Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischargers— Definitions. A. A Significant Commercial — Industrial User("SCIU") is any person or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but excluding domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per day("gpd"), or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD")greater than 150 pounds per day, or Suspended Solids ("SS")greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Article 3, due to having federally or District regulated or significant discharges. B. A special purpose discharger("SPD") is any person or entity who discharges to the sewer system wastewater or process flow in an amount greater than 25,000 gpd (excluding domestic, industrial or commercial) and who is required to obtain a Special Purpose Discharge Permit as prescribed in Section 305 of Ordinance No. OCSC-01 or its successor. C. An Existing SCIU or SPD is any SCIU or SPD discharger connected and discharging to the District's system prior to January 1, 2000. D. A New SCIU or SPD is any discharger who connects and discharges to the District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or after January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in Subparagraphs 3.07A and B above, but, subsequent to January 1, 2000, increases flow, or BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU or SPD. E. The maximum discharge allowed to a user, for which a base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Table D, attached hereto, is 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base use"). WSBS-TLW:pj*151421:05/0T/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 17 Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this Subparagraph 3.07E shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 3.08 and 3.09 hereof. F. Each Existing SCIU shall have a baseline of allowed discharge of flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of January 1, 2000. The baseline shall be based upon the discharge for Fiscal Year 1998-99, or upon such other discharge data which the District determines is representative of the users actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who are deemed to be SCIU's solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, pursuant to Section 3.07A above, shall have a minimum baseline established as follows: Flow— 25,000 gallons per day; BOD— 150 pounds per day; and SS— 150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to discharge flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. G. Each existing SPD shall have a baseline of 25,000 gpd, 150 pounds per day of BOD and 150 pounds of SS. The SPD shall be authorized to discharge flow up to 25,000 gpd without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. H. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed by Sections 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 below, shall be payable commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance. I. Within two (2) years from the date of the District's written notice to the SCIU of its baseline amounts, the SCIU shall have a right to appeal the District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the General Manager, or his designated representative, who shall have discretion, based upon extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager. The decision of the General Manager shall be final. Section 3.08. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial — Industrial Users. In addition to the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table D, attached hereto, for commercial — industrial use category properties, all New SCIU's shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound of BOD, or SS, exceeding the base use discharge maximums, in the amount shown in Table C: Section 3.09. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Puroose Dischargers. All new SPDs shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge of$0.00057 per gallon per day for each gallon of flow exceeding 25,000 gallons per day. Upon issue of permission to discharge, SPD with WS&S—TLW:pi:N151421:05/07102:Rev.3-CLEAN 18 discharges above 25,000 gpd shall pay a nonrefundable Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, prior to discharge, for one million gallons above 25,000 gpd. The deposit will be credited by the District against future Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges. Section 3.10. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial— Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischargers. A. All Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users connected to and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either (i) an increase of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 25% per day over its established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or (ii) an increase of either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per day, whichever is lesser, over its established baseline authorization. B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in the following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in Section 3.09A above: TABLE C SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Daily Charge Flow Gallons Per Day $0.00057 BOD Pounds Per Day $0.14461 SS Pounds Per Day $0.16025 C. All existing SPDs connected and discharging to the sewer shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon occurrence of an increase of discharge flow over 25,000 gpd. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be $0.00057 per gallon per day of discharge for each gallon above 25,000 gpd. D. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the User's baseline or 25,000 gpd for SPDs. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for a year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District. Section 3.11. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table D, attached hereto, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, WSBS-TLW:pj:#151421:05/07/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 19 equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table D that would be for the prior Category of use which was terminated and removed. Section 3.12. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the Distrias system facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table D, attached hereto, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table D for the prior category of use. Section 3.13. Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner, shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due, whether the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has expired. The Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3.06 through 3.10 hereinabove, established for property connecting to said facilities. Section 3.14. No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid for the connection of a specific building or structure on a parcel of property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any other parcel of property. Section 3.15. Baseline Transferability. The baseline of allowed discharge of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such previously existing baseline be provided to another SCIU concurrently or subsequently occupying the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in accordance with Section 3.08 above. WSBS—TLW:p1:#151421:05107102:Rev.3.CLEAN 20 TABLE D CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial — Industrial Per 1,000 square feet' Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 110.00' Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 675.001 High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,600.001 Single Family Residential Per Unit 5+ Bedrooms Per Unit $2,530.00 4 Bedrooms Per Unit $2,165.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,820.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,475.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $1,130.00 Multi-Family Residential Per Unit 4+ Bedrooms Per Unit $1,965.00 3 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,620.00 2 Bedrooms Per Unit $1,275.00 1 Bedroom Per Unit $ 910.00 Studio Per Unit $ 580.00 Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be $1,820.00; and all calculations shall be on a 1,000 square foot, or portion thereof, basis. A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file in the Office of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building Department of each City within the District. 'Low Demand connections are the following categories of Users: Nurseries; Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches; Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. "High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundries; Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants; Food Processing Facilities; Textile Manufacturers; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. "'All other connections are Average demand users. WS85-TLW:pj:#151421:05/01102:R.v.3-CLEAN 21 ARTICLE IV MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to recover those costs incurred by the District(i) on account of industrial dischargers' and wastehaulers' use of the District's facilities; (ii) when administering the District's Source Control Program; and (iii) when performing non-compliance sampling of industrial wastewater dischargers who have violated the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations or the terms and conditions of the dischargers permit. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used to defray the costs incurred by the District (i) on account of such use of the District's facilities; and (ii) in performing these tasks. Section 4.02. Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees. Administrative fees and charges relating to permittees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4.03. Industrial Discharger Source Control, and Non- Compliance Sampling Fees. Industrial discharger, source control, and non- compliance sampling fees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference- Section 4.04. Special Purpose Discharge Permittees Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 305.5 and 305.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, charges for use are hereby established for Special Purpose Discharge Permittees, as set forth in Table G, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4.05. Class I and Class II Permittees — Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 302.3, 302.6, 303.3 and 303.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended,the charges for use are hereby established for Class I and Class II Permittees as set forth in Table G, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4.06. Wastehauler Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 306.3 and 306.7 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for wastehaulers as set forth in Table H, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. WSBS-TLW:pj:#151421:05/07/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 22 Section 4.07. Administrative Appeals. A. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any decision, action, or determination by the District may, within forty-five (45) days of the date of mailing by the District of the initial invoice for fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance, request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees. Following review of such a request, the District shall notify the user, permit applicant, or permittee by certified mail of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. B. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by the District's decision on the reconsideration request, may file an appeal in accordance with Sections 617 and 619 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. TABLE E ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITTEES Permit Fees Charges A. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit $335.00/year B. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit $70.00/year C. Special Purpose Discharge Permit $250.00/year - One-Time Application $975.00/permit - Nonrefundable Deposit for First One Million Gallons— New Permit Only $282.94 D. Wastehauler Discharge Permit $75.00/year Wastehauler Fees Charges F. Permit Decal Initial Issue $25.00 G. Permit Decal Replacement $50.00 H. Entry Card Initial Issue $50.00 I. Entry Card Replacement $100.00 J. After Hours Discharge— Prearranged $85.00/event K. After Hours Discharge— Emergency $100.00/event WSBS-TLW:pl:a151421:05/0'//02:Re,3-CLEAN 23 TABLE E (CONTINUED) ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITTEES Administrative/Processing Fees: Charges L. District's Collection of Tax Data $100.00/permit M. District's Collection of Water Consumption Data $100.00/permit N. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400/appeal WS&S-T1_W:p1:#151421:M07/02:Re,3-CLEAN 24 TABLE F INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Minor Violation $225.00/event Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Major Violation $500.00/event Cost of Analysis Charge Heavy Metals: $35.00/each -Aluminum -Antimony -Arsenic - Cadmium - Chromium - Copper - Gold - Lead - Molybdenum - Nickel - Palladrum - Platinum - Selenium - Silver - Thallium - Zinc Mercury $78.00 601/602 $152.00 604 $223.00 606 $254.00 608 $523.00 610 $73.00 612 $200.00 624 $355.00 625 $661.00 Ammonia Analysis as Nkrogen $21.00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") $44.00 BOD and Suspended Solids ('SS")Analysis $67.00 Chemical Oxygen Demand $44.00 Conductivity $15.00 WSBS-TLW:p1:11151421:05107/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 25 TABLE F (CONTINUED) INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge Cyanide (Amenable) $70.00 Dissolved Mineral Solids $15.00 Gamma Radiation Determination $115.00 Gross Alpha and Beta Determination $50.00 Tritium Determination $50.00 Grease and Oil (Hexane Soluble Matter) $74.00 Grease and Oil (Mineral Partition) $74.00 Total Organic Nitrogen $48.00 pH $8.00 Fluoride $51 .00 Suspended Solids (Total) $23.00 Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) $44.00 Total Dissolved Solids $14.00 Total Sulfides $29.00 WSBS-TLW:pl:9151421:05107102:Rev.3-CLEAN 26 TABLE G CLASS I AND CLASS II PERMITTEES AND SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITTEES CHARGES FOR USE Revenue Area Flaw (*) S.S. (**) B.O.D.(***) Consolidated Revenue Areas $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 Revenue Area No. 7 $282.92 $190.65 $184.55 Revenue Area No. 14 All Revenue Area 14 operations and maintenance costs are paid directly by the Irvine Ranch Water District Flow - Per million gallons of flow S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids ***B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand Wass-TLW:pj:N151421:05/07/02:Rev.3-CLEAN 27 TABLE H WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE Wastehauler Fees Charges Charge for Use —Waste originating $0.035/gallon of within Orange County truck capacity Charge for Use —Waste originating $0.035/gallon of outside Orange County truck capacity WSBS-TLW:pj:#151421:0W07IO2:Re,3-CLEAN 28 ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01. Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be in addition to the provisions of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District's Sewage Facilities, including provisions for payment of charges or fees related thereto; District Ordinance No. OCSD-03, as amended, Establishing Fees Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and any other District Ordinances and Resolutions not in conflict herewith. Section 5.02. Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax- exempt organizations, except as expressly provided herein. Section 5.03. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section 5.04. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect July 1, 2002. Section 5.05. Repeal. Ordinance No. OCSD-15 is hereby repealed. Section 5.06: Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required bylaw. PASSED AND ADOPTED by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held May 22, 2002. WSSS-TLW:pj:#151421:05/07IO2:Rev.3-CLEAN 29 FAHR COMMITTEE MeedngDate To ad.ofDlr. 04/10/02 05/22/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR02-35 20 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: INCLUDING ANNUAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE 2002-03 PROPERTY TAX BILL GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-10, directing the County Tax Collector-Treasurer to include sanitary sewer service charges on the 2002-03 property tax bill. SUMMARY Section 5473 of the California Health & Safety Code provides that sanitary sewer service charges may be collected as a separate line item on the annual property tax bill. The District has utilized this method of fee collection since the inception of these fees. The two principal benefits of this collection method are that the District does not need to develop or fund a utility billing division, and that failure to pay these fees results in a lien against the property, so all fees are ultimately received. The Code requires a new Resolution from the District directing the County Tax Collector to collect these fees every time the rates change. The FAHR Committee will discuss potential annual rates as a separate agenda item at the April meeting. The rates for 2002-03 will be considered for adoption at the May 22, 2002 Board meeting. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The County Tax Collector-Treasurer charges us for a copy of the database, updates, and for minor programming. The County Auditor charges us, via deduction from fees collected, for the actual collection expenses. Annual collections costs are approximately$220,000 or .3% of the sewer service fees. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) G:1rq P,wn R< 11=2...M ABeotla RepJtl51B5B911em 201.11e BiRdx Re-. 812W Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES Collect these fees with OCSD staff and a direct billing program. This is a more costly alternative and one without a method to force payment. CECIA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. OCSD-02-10 GGS:lc GMq.W VpWCLLo✓4 PW^M19 ReCT53W3 BwN�pRW RepW`OSONIem A.PrtpTaBibx ReNM: veam Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 00SD 02-10 DIRECTING COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR TO COLLECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 2002-03 PROPERTY TAX BILLS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DIRECTING THE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR TO INCLUDE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE 2002-03 PROPERTY TAX BILLS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 00SD 01-10 WHEREAS, by adoption of Ordinance No. OCSDA 5, and as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-XX, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District elected to adopt, impose, and collect rates and charges for sanitary sewer services and facilities provided by the District, and established procedures related thereto. The sanitary sewer service charges were set by Ordinance No. OCSDA 5. and as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-XX, as set forth therein; and WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by District Ordinance, may be collected on the County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with, and not separate from, its general taxes; and WHEREAS, as part of the budget preparation process, the District's Management has prepared financial and engineering reports, setting forth financial projections for providing the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services and facilities to the District's service areas for Fiscal Year 2002-03. Said reports have been made available to the public for Fiscal Year 2002-03. The charges established by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, and as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-XX, reflect an allocation of the costs of operation and maintenance, such that the charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to provide the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services and facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: Pursuant to California Constitution Article XIIID (Proposition 218), as of July 1, 1997, sanitary sewer service charges are deemed assessments. The sanitary sewer service charges set by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, and as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-XX, comply with the provisions of Article XIIID, in that they are existing charges first set by the Board of Directors of the District prior to November 6, 1996. The charges are not increased in all areas but are increased in some, and the methodology for the rate is the same as in previous years. The charges are imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs, maintenance, and operating expenses of the District's sewer facilities. Section 2: That the rates and charges set forth in Ordinance No. OCSDA 5, and as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-XX, are affirmed or modified by the Board of Directors, as consistent with the findings hereinabove stated, for Fiscal Year 2002-03, in the following amounts: O:My.Eu+epeMa+BmrOnpenW Repdb1Y002BmN belle FepoNW5W11an20.PrapTex9YI.E¢ vuo, Page 3 Single Family Residential Rates Revenue Area 2002-03 Rate 1 $87.50 2 $87.50 3 $87.50 5 $87.50 6 $87.50 7 $87.50 11 $87.50 13 $87.50 14 All Revenue Area 14 Costs Are Paid Directly By IRW D Section 3: That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, the County Tax Collector is hereby ordered and directed to include sanitary sewer service charges, as adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-15, and as amended by Ordinance No. OCSD-XX, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this Resolution remains in effect. Section 4: That pursuant to California Health & Safety Cade Section 5473, this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed, or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. OCSD-15 and as amended by Ordinance OCSD-XX, is changed. Section 5: That the General Manager be, and is hereby authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section 1 herein. Section 6: That Resolution No. OCSD 01-10 is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 22, 2002. CHAIR ATTEST: BOARD SECRETARY G:MOdICY9mYaBmrE Apmi6f R k=B Aqs Repe,m�OZXem MAvpTeWA9a ae,W!WWI Page 4 Tr w ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT i a Chird Quarter Financial Report ""�"'�-, For the \ine Uonlhs End�d iVlarch 31 , ?002 Table of Contents Section1 -Overview...................................................................................................................1 Financial Report- r Section 2-Joint Operating Budget Review �. Chart of the Cost per Million Gallons by Department—Budget and Actual............................1 Chart of the Net Expenses by Major Category—Budget and Actual.....................................1 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge.......................................................................2 Comparison of Expenses by Department..............................................................................3 v Summary of Expenses by Major Category............................................................................4 Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item............................................................5 w Summary of Expenses by Line Item......................................................................................6 Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process......................................................................8 Chartof Staffing Trends........................................................................................................9 Section 3- Capital Improvement Program Review y Capital Improvement Program Graphs by Type and Funding Source...................................1 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year.....................2 Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements- Project Life........:...............6 Section 4-Budget Review by Revenue Area Summary Budget Reviews-All Revenue Areas....................................................................1 +� Consolidated Revenue Area Budget Review.........................................................................2 RevenueArea No. 7 Budget Review ....................................................................................3 ,. Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review...................................................................................4 Section 5—Self Insurance Budget Review General Liability Fund Budget Review...................................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Fund Budget Review......................................................................2 d 2001-02 Third Quarter Report r r This Page Intentionally Left Blank a W W W Y W ® Overview Third Quarter Financial Report March 31, 2002 The Finance Department is pleased to present the 2001-02 third quarter comprehensive financial report. This report provides the Directors, staff, and the .+ general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District and reports on the status of all capital projects in progress. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. Joint Operating Budget Review., At March 31, 2002, 70.85 percent, or$36.95 million of the 2001-02 net joint operating budget of$52.16 million has been expended. Net operating expenses increased by $1.94 million from the same period last year, primarily due to 1) increased salaries, wages, and employee benefits as a result of fourteen additional full-time equivalent employees and 2) an average increase of 5 percent in salaries of current employees. The total cost per million gallons at March 31, 2002 is $575.59 based on flows of 64.20 billion gallons, or 234.30 million gallons per day. This is$4.03, or 0.71 percent above the budgeted cost per million gallons of$571.56. This higher cost per million gallons is due to flows being 6.28 percent lower than the budgeted amount of 250 million gallons per day which is offset somewhat by net expenses being 5.54 percent or$2.17 million lower than the proportionate budget through March 31, 2002. Some of the significant joint operating results as of March 31, 2002 include: Revenues s Inter District Sewer Use Revenue—These usage charges are comparatively low at $608,300, or 40.56 percent of the $1,500,000 budget, through March 31 because of ® lower than anticipated discharge levels by other agencies. Compressed Natural Gas Sales Revenue—This revenue is comparatively low at .+ $132,100, or 35.21 percent of the $375,000 budget through March 31 because of reduced sales to customers. The largest customer, a taxi company, declared bankruptcy in November, and as of March 31, no new customers have been established. Rent and Lease Revenue—Lease revenue is at $20,900, or 16.04 percent of the P $130,000 budget, due to the cancellation of a lease for space which is now needed for the Groundwater Replenishment Project. • Power Sales Revenue— Power sales revenue is at $141,500, or 23.58 percent of the $600,000 budget, because of a reduction in the production and sale of electricity resulting from the rates for purchasing natural gas and the need to rehabilitate our digester gas system. Section 1 - Page 1 2001-02 Third Quarter Report Expenses ` • Salaries. Wages and Benefits—Joint operating personnel costs were at 74.72 percent of budget through March 31 while staffing was 58 full-time equivalents v (FTE's), or 10.10 percent below the total 574 FTE's approved in the 2001-02 budget. Net joint operating personnel costs are expected to be at or below budget at year-end. • Memberships— Membership expense totaled $172,700, or 92.78 percent of the $186,100 budget, as of March 31 because the majority of the District's memberships are paid in the first half of each year. These costs are expected to approximate budget at year-end. • Training—Training expense totaled $286,000, or 38.78 percent of the$737,700 budget, as of March 31 because many of the District's training programs are scheduled to occur in the last part of the year. It is anticipated that training costs _ will increase during the fourth quarter, but will remain below the total amount budgeted at fiscal year-end. r• • Solids Removal Contractual Services—Biosolids removal costs totaled $4,554,300, or 82.81 percent of the $5,500,000 budget as of March 31. This expense is higher ++ than the proportionate budget primarily due to higher hauling rates than were anticipated when the budget was prepared and the closure of some re-use sites. r • Professional Services—Overall professional services totaled $1,174,500, or 50.11 percent of the composite $2,343,900 budget. The costs are proportionately low due to 1) specific services anticipated to be needed when the budget was prepared that will now be delayed until future years, such as $20,000 for engineering benchmarking consultants, $25,000 for ocean outfall booster station studies, $25,000 for an engineering optimization study, and $62,000 for energy conservation programs; and 2) other professional services that are in the planning or in-progress stages, such as the $168,000 remaining on the capital project management process w project, $115,000 for the capacity management operation and maintenance project, and $22,000 remaining on the compensation and classification study. It is anticipated that the overall costs for this category will increase during the fourth quarter but will be below the total amount budgeted at fiscal year-end. • Utilities—As of March 31, utility costs totaled $3,107,500, or 50.13 percent of the y $6,199,100 budget. The overall expense is proportionately low primarily because the negotiated cost for natural gas is significantly lower than was anticipated when the budget was prepared. In addition, due to the low cost of natural gas, more v natural gas has been used in place of electricity, thereby driving down the District's power cost. u W Section 1 - Page 2 W Overview Comparison of Third Quarter Cost per Million Gallon Results With Year-End Actuals (Budget) Last Five Years eo3 ne.ro Hiss � sre.x P.]9 525 50o.]S 495.41 � 118.58 N,." �50.1 s 450 3]5 U--N 53-xB M9 sour 9A2 3d Year 3d Year 3d Year 3d Year 3d Annual Or erd Or and Oa end Or end Or Badger As demonstrated in the preceding graph, the cost per million gallons at the end of the r third quarter has been within 3.50 percent of year-end totals. The cost comparison for 2001-02 is consistent with this trend as the third-year cost per million gallons is within 0.71 percent of the budget. Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's actual contribution towards the gallonage charge through the third quarter of 2001-02 and as budgeted for 2001-02. Page 1 also provides a budget to actual graphical comparison of revenues and expenses by major category. More detailed information is provided at the following locations: Section 2 - Page 2 provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the third quarter for the current and two prior years; Section 2— Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for March 31, 2000, 2001, and 2002; Section 2— Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major category through March 31, 2002 and 2001; Section 2— Page 5 provides a summary of joint operating revenues by line item through March 31, 2002 and 2001; Section 2— pages 6 and 7 provide a summary of expenses by line item through March 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2— Page 8 provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through March 31, 2001 and 2000; Section 2— Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total positions authorized, actual positions filled, and vacant positions. Section 1 - Page 3 r r 2001-02 Third Quarter Report Capital Outlay Review: • $160,000,000 M $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60.000,000 1 AN $410 000,000 _ $201000.000 so 030/02 Actual projected 2001�02 Revised 2001-02 Capital Outlay Capital Outlay Capital Outlay $52,975.600 $92,630,200 Cashlim Budget $146,585.900 4r As depicted by the preceding chart, total Capital Outlay expenditures totaled $52,975,600 or 36.14 percent of the capital outlay estimate for 2001-02 as of March 31, 2002. Costs are proportionately low through the third quarter as many projects are still in the design phase or have experienced various delays. Capital outlay costs are expected to be $92,630,200, or 63.19 percent of budget at year-end. Section 3 - Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital .. expenditures incurred for each process category and a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each major capital improvement purpose. For more detailed information, Section 3— Pages 2 through 5 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Pages 6 through 9 provide a summary of the construction requirements of each project over the project life. Budget Review by Revenue Areas: At March 31, 2002, revenues from all Revenue Areas totaled $98.95 million, or 21.82 percent of budget. Tax allocations and subvention revenue, budgeted at $38.15 million, is at 68.62 percent of budget, or $26.18 million, and Other User Fees, budgeted at$85.08 million, is at 57.08 percent of budget, or$48.57 million. Both of these revenue sources are proportionately low through the third quarter because a significant portion of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are distributed to the District during the last quarter of the fiscal year. Interest revenue, budgeted at 38.31 million, is at $18.36 million, or 47.92 percent of budget. This is due to the lower than anticipated interest rate yields occurring in the current year. No significant sale of capacity rights, budgeted at $6.2 million, have been .. received as of March 31, 2002. There currently is a pending $2.6 million capacity sale to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. Due to the delays in capital outlay spending, proceeds from debt issuance will be moved out to 2002-03. Section 1 - Page 4 r e Overview Conversely, connection fee earnings of $5.85 million exceed the budgeted amount of $5.82 million due to higher than expected building activity within the member cities. Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $120.41 million, or 48.39 percent of budget through the third quarter. The costs incurred related to capital improvement projects are proportionately low at$52.98 million or 36.14 percent of budget, as `^ previously explained in the Capital Outlay Section. Additionally, COP retirement and interest expense, budgeted at $38.94 million, are low at 52.22 percent of budget, or $20.33 million, essentially due to lower than anticipated interest rates. All other r expenses are near the proportionate budget through the third quarter. Self-Insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for portions of workers' compensation, property damage, and general liability. Separate fund accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $1.59 million or 72.74 percent of the $2.18 million budget at March 31, while total expenses were $2.11 million or 89.86 percent of the $2.35 million budget. r r r r w r Section 1 - Page 5 r 2001 -02 Third Quarter Report t w V M V This Page Intentionally Left Blank L i L yd w N I � V i • L Section 1 - Page 6 Joint Operating Budget Review Cost per Million Gallons by Department Budget and Actual sm Seen Sao � seoo s3m S32a S2ad uw � szao S190 �. Simo $m $ee so EaecNM Flnente HIImYI TedaYtal EnaMadnp Openllanc 6 Iho ltion MBNpamanl B85OVICeb SBMcas Mainle�aza T.BCflnplogy w ■Budget ■Actual Net Expenses by Major Category Budget and Actual (in thousands) $espdd $e2.= S3aA00 �� 538,000 M.000 $W.000 _ SO= $2e.000 $21.000 _ $1a.= VS.000 $12.000 Se.000 WOW $3.000 50 e cg em eEz ec 82- 5 m §"' m ; c EQ as E� Pjw ��, in rt � a — Fm 24 aR S 1'n F ■Budget ■ACWtl Section 2 - Page 1 l� 2001 -02 Third Quarter Report Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001-02 I i 03/31/00 03/31/01 Annual 03/31/02 W Actual Actual Budget Actual Flow In Million Gallons 66,228.00 67,556.00 91,250.00 64,197.00 I Flow In Million Gallons per Day 240.83 246.55 250.00 234.30 General Managers Department General Management Administration $ 15.07 $ 13.15 $ 15.10 $ 14.46 Administrative Services - - 9.40 10.63 Communications 8.54 9.41 5.08 5.65 Subtotal 23.61 22.56 30.18 30.64 Finance Department Finance Adminislmtion 16.31 16.72 22.09 16.40 `r Accounting 15.28 13.94 16.68 16.85 Purchasing 8 Warehousing 10.67 11.49 13.44 13.64 Subtotal 42.16 41.15 52.21 46.89 Human Resources Department Human Resources 8 Emp Development 15.06 13.74 15.95 1359 Safety 8 Emergency Response 9.24 10.11 10.52 6.96 I Subtotal 24.90 23.85 26.47 2055. V Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 7.86 8.74 7.92 8.80 Environmental Compliance 8 Monitoring 42.94 41.63 36.56 39.47 L� Environmental Sciences Laboratory 3921 38.70 43.53 43.63 Source Control 29.77 31.29 33.22 36.95 Subtotal 119.78 11B.46 220.23 225.85 I Engineering Department Engineering Administration 3.48 4.77 7.38 6.15 Planning B Design 30.04 3D.53 33.23 37.59 Construclion Management 35.16 34.79 37.73 38.75 Subtotal 68.68 70.09 78.34 82.49 Operations 8 Maintenance Department Opns 8 Maint. Administration 9A0 6.46 3.00 3.35 O 8 M Process Engineering 11.82 11.36 13.31 12.29 Plant No.1 Operations 74.57 78.17 88.85 90.63 Plant No.2 Operations 106.85 114.88 110.54 125.27 Mechanical Maintenance 54.34 52.70 59.38 68.13 Electrical 6 Instrumentation Mice, 62.55 62.36 68.86 66.44 Central Generation 30.16 43A2 52.87 41.41 Air Quality B Special Projects 13AG 13.28 14.07 15.14 Collection Facilities Maintenance 25.16 16.09 17.86 17.81 v Plant Fadlities Maintenance 44.50 41.34 63.19 51.07 Subtotal 431.84 440.00 487.93 881.54 ..i Information Technology Department L Information Technology Administration 8.25 8.86 10.56 9.09 Customer B Network Support 18.73 17.39 20.85 18.95 Programing 8 Database 6.16 12.44 13.31 12.43 III Process CIA Integration 8.83 10.36 12.82 12.18 y Subtotal 41.97 49.06 57.54 52.65 Total Joint Operating Expenses 752.94 765.21 852.90 640.61 Less: Cost Allocation (199.49) 209,70 (229.50) (228.03) Net Joint Operating Requirements 563.45 555.51 623.40 612.58 Lass: Revenues (58.04) (37,26) (51.84) (36.99)Not Joint Operating Expenses $ 495.41 $ 518.25 $ 571.56 $ 575.59 L Section 2 -Page 2 U Joint Operating Budget Review s Comparison of Expenses by Department For the Nine Months Ended March 31, ea 2001412 03131100 03131/01 Year to Date Budget% Department and Division Actual Actual Budget 03/31/02 Realized a+ General Manager's Department General Management Administration $ 998.083 $ $88,103 $ 1,377.700 $ 928,135 67.37% Administrative Services - 858,101) 676.210 78.BD% 00 635,388 Communications 565,3 518.100 362,614 69.99% r. Subtotal 1,563,383 1,623,471 2.753.900 1,966,959 71.42% Finance Department Finance Administration 1,080,077 1,061,832 2.015.900 1,053.069 52.24% a Accounting 1.011.988 941,965 1,521,700 1,081.849 71.09% Purchasing&Warehousing 700,353 775,966 1,226.800 875.936 71.40% Subtotal 2,792,418 2,779,763 4,764.400 3,010.854 63.19% Human Resources Department ea' Human Resources&Emp Development 1,037,424 927.944 1,455,500 872,323 59.93% Safety&Emergency Response 612,003 683.190 980,200 446,760 46.53% Subtotal 1,649,427 1,611,134 2,415,700 1,319,083 54.60% y Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 520,346 455.253 723,100 436,266 60.33% Environmental Compliance Monitoring 2,843,679 2,812,764 3,244,800 2,533.672 78,08% Environmental Sciences Laboratory 2.596,915 2,620,445 3,972,300 2,800,782 70.51% Source Control 1,971,290 2,113,966 3,031,500 2,307,685 76.12% Subtotal 7,932,230 8,002,428 10,971,700 8,078,405 73.63% Engineering Department Engineering Administration 230,573 322,369 673.200 394,697 58.63% Planning&Design 1,989.411 2,062.154 3,032,500 2.413,083 79.57% Construction Management 2,328,419 2,350,223 3.442.800 2.487,345 72.25% Subtotal 4.548.403 4,734.736 7,148,500 5.295,125 74.07% Operations&Maintenance Department Opine&Main. Administaton 622,656 436,195 273,500 214,761 78.52% 0&M Process Engineering 782,914 767,142 1,214,400 789,268 64.99% Plant No. 1 Operations 4,938,483 5,281,797 8.107,300 5,818.227 71.77% Plant No.2 Operations 7,010,568 7,761,444 10.634,100 8,042.223 75.63% Mechanical Maintenance 3,598,625 3.560.183 5.418,700 3.731.494 68.86% Electrical&Instrumentation Mtce. 4,142,536 4,213,042 6,283,100 4,265.495 67.89% Central Generation 1,997,165 2,933,405 4,824,100 2.658,099 55.10% Air Quality&Special Projects 893,331 897,227 1,284,300 971,689 75.66% Collection Facilities Maintenance 1,666,118 1,067,116 1,629,300 1,143,063 70.16% Plant Facilities Maintenance 2,947,361 2.792,486 4,854,000 3.278,698 67.55% Subtotal 28,599,757 29.730.037 44,522,800 30,913,017 69.43% Information Technology Department Information Technology Administration 546,154 598,427 963,580 583.558 60.56% ^' Customer&Network Support 1,240,865 1,174,881 1.902,920 1,216,677 63.94% Programing&Database 408,154 840,335 1.214,160 797,985 65.72% Process Ctd Integration 585,058 700,050 1,169,640 781,959 66.85% .y Subtotal 2,780,231 31313,693 5,250,300 3,380,179 64.38% Total Joint Operating Expenses 49.865,849 51,695,262 77,827,300 53,963.622 69.34% Less: Cost Allocation (13,211,867) (14,166,671) (20,942,200) (14.638.439) 69.90% r Net Joint Operating Requirements 36,653.992 37,528,591 56,885,100 39.325.183 69.13% Less: Revenues (3,843,725) (2,517.433) (4,730,DDD) (2,374.168) 50.19% Net Joint Operating Expenses $32,810,267 $ 35.011,158 $ 52,155,100 $ 36,951.015 70.85% r r Section 2-Page 3 W 2001-02 Third Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Major Category w For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 u Expense Expense Increase Increase Percent Budget Through Through (Decrease) (Decrease) Budget Remaining Description 2001-02 03131/02 03/31/01 $ % Realized Budget Salary,Wages 8 Benefits $43,139.600 $32,235,635 $30,008.255 $ 2,227,380 7A2% 74.72% $10,903,965 Administrative Expanses 773,100 508.444 534,256 (25,812) 4.83% 65.77% 264,656 6w Printing 8 Publication 400,300 304,431 275,190 29,241 10.63% 76.05% 95.869 Training 8 Meetings 990.800 452,706 531,258 (78,552) -14.79% 45.69% 538,094 r Operating Expenses 6.569,700 4.461,389 4,373,811 87,578 2.00% 67.91% 2,108,311 Contractual Services 8.008,800 5.957,567 5.398.308 559,259 10.36% 74.39% 2,051.233 Professional Services 2.343,900 1,174,490 1,086,067 88.423 8A4% 50.11% 1,169,410 Research B Monitoring 1.577.300 1,143,828 1,718,537 (574.709) -33.44% 72.52% 433,472 �fto Repairs 8 Maintenance 5,003,300 3.222,025 2.815,930 406,095 14.42% 64.40% 1,781,275 - Utilities 6,199,100 3.107.535 3.546,189 (438,654) -12.37% 50.13% 3,091,565 Other Materials,Supplies, and Services 2,821,400 1,395.572 1.407.461 (11,889) -0.84% 49.46% 1,425,a28 Net Cost Allocation (20,942.200) (14,638,439) (14.166,671) (471,768) 3.33% 69.90% (6,303.761) Net J.O.Requirements 56,885.100 39,325,183 37.528,591 1,796.592 4.79% 69.13% 17,559,917 Revenues (4,730,000) (2,374,168) (2,517,433) 143,265 -5.69% 50,19% (2,355,832) Net J.O.Expenses $52,155,100 $36,951,015 $35,011.158 $ 1,939,857 5.54% 70.85% $15,204,085 W Gallonage Flow(MG) 91.250.00 64,197.00 67,556.00 (3.359) 4.97% W Gallonage Flow(MGD) 250.00 234.30 246.55 (12.25) 4.97% Gallonage Flow($'a/MG) $571.56 $575.59 $518.25 $57.34 11.06% yr W r W Section 2-Page 4 Joint Operating Budget Review s Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 r (revenue Revenue Revenue Increase Increase Budget Through Through Remaining Through (Decrease) (Decrease) s Description 2001-02 03131102 03/31102 Budget 03131/01 $ % Inter District Sewer Use $ 1,5W,000 $ 608,335 40.56% $ 891.665 $ 71,316 $ 537.020 753.03% Wastehouler 450,000 322,553 71.68% 127.447 354,875 (32,322) -9.11% e. Sludge Disposal 800,000 800,298 75.04% 199,702 504,329 95,989 19.03% CNG Sales 375.DD0 132,VA 35.21% 242.946 239.150 (107.096) -44.78% ti Scrap Sales - 30 WA (30) 12,688 (12,655) -99.76% Other Sales - 8.172 WA (6,172) 12.069 (5,897) 48.86% Rents 8 Leases 130.000 20.857 16.04% 109,143 128.163 (107.306) -83.73% w General Non-Operating 75,000 100,749 134.33% (25,749) 189,288 (88.539) 46.77% Vehicle B Equipment 300,000 180,900 60.30% 119.100 174.360 6.540 3.75% Power Sales 600,000 141.466 23.58% 468,534 427,636 (286.170) -66.92% m Sampling Charges 500,000 260,754 52.15% 239,2/8 403,580 (142,808) 35.39% Total $4,730,000 $2.374,168 50.19% $2,355,832 $2,517,433 $(143,265) -5.69% era er w r e~ r r ro Section 2 -Page 5 W 2001-02 Third Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 i Expense %Expense Expense Increase Increase W Budget Through Through Remaining Through (Decrease) (Decrease) Description 2001-02 03/31102 03131/02 Budget 03/31/01 8 % Salaries.Wanes&Benefits Salad"&Wages $ 36,553,300 $ 27,588,066 75,47% 6 8,965.234 6 25,829,836 $ 1,768,230 6.81% _ Employee Benefits: Retirement 1.754.100 1,306.725 74.50% 447,375 1.223,679 83.046 6]9% �I Group Insurances 4,347,900 2.940.214 67.62% 1.407,686 2.595.859 344,355 13.27% Tuition Reimbursement 74,300 100.885 135.78% (26,585) 55.778 45,107 80.87% - Uniform Rental 72,100 60.387 83.75% 11,713 54,519 5,868 10.76% Workers'Campensation 317,600 238,200 75,00% 79.400 232,498 5.702 2.45% d► Unemployment Insurance 20,300 11158 5.70% 19.142 16,086 (14.928) -92,80% Total Benefits 6,586,300 4,647.569 70.56% 1.938,731 4,178.419 469,150 11.23% Salaries,Wag"&Benefits 43,139,600 32,235,635 74.72% 10.903,965 30.008.255 2.227,380 7A2% W Mail.Supply.&Services Administrative Expenses Memberships 186.100 172,659 92.78% 13,4V1 175.151 (2,492) -1.42% OIBce Exp-Supplies 130,000 86.822 66.79% 43,178 85.695 1,127 1.32% Office Expense-Omer 100,800 57,573 57.12% 43,227 55.395 2,178 3.93% Small Computer Items 256.400 153,964 60.06% 102,416 168,090 (14,106) A.39% Minor Furniture&Fixtures 99.800 37.406 37.48% 62,394 49,925 (12.519) -25.08% W Printing&Publimtlon Repro-In-House 261,600 223,933 85.6D% 37.667 187.450 36,483 19A6% Pdnbng-OuWde 64,000 33.372 52.14% 30.628 35,392 (3,020) -8.30% Notices&Ads 57,100 38,708 67.79% 18,392 46,357 (7,649) -16.50% Photo Processing 17,600 8,418 47.83% 9,182 4,991 3,427 68.66% _ - Training&Meetings Meetings 253,100 166,659 65.85% 86,441 143.907 22.752 15.81% W Training 737,700 286,047 38.78% 451,653 387,351 (101,304) -26.15% Operating Expenses Chemical Coagulants 1.624,000 1,072,223 66.02% 551,777 1.100,980 (28,757) -2.61% W Sulfide Control 1.784.000 1,233,616 69.15% 550,384 1,316.786 (83.170) -6.32% Odor Control 1.686,800 1,298,769 77.00% 388.031 949.321 349.448 36.81% Disinfection 97.900 53,444 54.59% 44.456 131,827 (78.383) -59.46% Chemicals-Cogan Oper. 15.000 4,396 29.31% 10.604 4,882 (486) -9.95% W Miscellaneous Chemicals 16,500 10.919 66.18% 5.561 11,223 (304) -2.71% _ Gasoline,Diesel&Oil 599,600 180.218 30,06% 419.382 311,769 (131.551) 42.20% ' Tools 110,100 84,505 76.83% 25.515 83,485 1,100 1.32% Solv,Paints&Jan.Supplies 41.500 33,516 80.76% 7,984 32,571 945 2,90% Lab Chamicals&Supplies 312,100 267,304 85.65% 44.796 319,728 (52.424) -16.40% _. Other Operating Supplies 246.200 192,140 78.04% 54,060 111,239 60,901 72,73% Property Tax Fees 36,000 30,259 84.05% 5,741 - 30,259 WA W Contractual Services Solids Removal 5,500,000 4,554,293 82.81% 945,707 4.025,960 528,333 13.12% Omer Waste Disposal 668,800 311,179 46.53% 357,621 275,280 35.899 13.04% Groundskeeping 200,000 121.178 60,59% 78,822 - 121,178 WA W Janitorial 250.000 149.564 59.83% 100.436 309,704 (160.140) -51.71% _ Outside Lab Services 254.800 151,333 59.39% 103,467 151,477 (144) -0.10% Oxygen Plant Oper 295.000 225.353 76.39% 69,647 217,227 8,126 3.74% W Temporary Services 365,900 200,939 54.92% 164,961 - 200,939 WA Sammy Services 199,300 101.580 50.97% 97.720 - 101,580 WA - In-Plant Line Cleaning 54,000 - 0.D0% 54.000 - - WA Other 221,000 142,148 64.32% 78,852 418,660 (276.512) -66.05% w (Continued) Section 2-Page 6 1W Joint Operating Budget Review 's Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 ritl Expense %Expense Expense Increase Increase Budget Through Through Remaining Through (Decrease) (Decrease) Description 2001-02 OW31102 03131102 Budget 03131101 $ % Continued: professional Services Legal 428,000 354.544 82.84% 73.456 332,007 22.537 6.79% Audit&Accounting 74,300 45200 60.83% 29,100 42,600 2.600 6.10% ps Engineering 190,000 57,007 30.00% 132.993 185,014 (128.007) -69.19% Enviro Scientific Consulting 344,500 228,792 66A1% 115,708 - 228,792 N/A FIS Support 226.100 105.769 46.78% 120,331 - 105,769 N/A Soffware Prgm Consulting 170,300 72,829 42.77% 97.471 - 72.829 WA Energy Consulting 62,000 - 0,00% 62,000 - - WA Advocacy Efforts 64,000 30,000 46.88% 34.000 - 30,000 N/A Industrial Hygiene Services 10.000 - 0.00% 10.000 - - N/A Labor Negotiation Services 36.300 7.695 21.20% 28,605 - 7.695 N/A ADR Services 12.500 - 0.00% 12.500 - - N/A Other 725,900 272.654 37.56% 453246 526.446 (253,792) -48.21% Research&Moalloring Eoviroomental Monitoring 915,400 790,427 86.35% 124,973 1.369,870 Air Ouality Monitoring 105,000 87,113 82.96% 17.887 74.983 12,130 16.18% Research 556,900 266,28E 47-82% 290.612 273,684 (7,396) -2.70% �.r Repairs&Maintenance Materials&Services 3,843,800 2,545,080 65.21% 1.298.720 2,275,056 270,024 11.87% Svc.Mic.Agreements 1,159,500 676,945 58.38% 482,555 540.874 136,071 25.16% Utilities Telephone 230,000 117.674 51.16% 112,326 149,541 (31.867) .21.31% Diesel For Generators 25,000 5.307 2123% 19,693 11.635 (6,328) -54.39% r Natend Gas 3,305,100 1,379,373 41.73% 1,925.727 1,780,220 (400,847) -22.52% Power 1.574,000 804,975 51.14% 769,025 $65,641 (60.666) -7.01% Water 1,065,000 80 .206 75.14% 264,794 739.162 61.054 8.26% Other Operating Supplies Outside Equip Rental 84.700 69239 81.75% 15,461 113.984 (44.745) -39.26% District Equip Rental 248.900 1BV21 7281% 67,679 174,076 7.145 4.10% Insurance 1,750,000 845.041 48.29% 904,959 773,038 7ZO03 9.31% Freight 67,200 42,939 83.90% 24,281 48.257 (5,318) -11.02% Misc.Operating Expense 205,300 121,471 59.17% 83,829 114,967 6,504 5.66% AOMD Operating Fees 130,000 111,803 86.00% 18,197 102.275 9,528 9.32% sr General Manager Contingency 279200 - 0.00% 279.200 - - N/A Prior year reappropriation (1,900) - 0.00% (1,900) - - N/A ^' Other Non-Oper Expense 58,000 23,858 41.13% 34,142 60.864 (67,006) -70.5D% Made,Supp,It Sew. 34,687,700 21.727.997 62.64% 12,959,713 21,687,007 40,980 0.19% ar+ Total Expenditures 77,827,300 63.963.622 69.34% 23,863,678 61,695,262 2,268,360 4.39% Lass:Cost Allocation (20,9422DO) (14.638.439) 69.90% (6,303,761) (14,166,671) (471,768) 3.33% Net J.0.Requirements 56,885,100 39.325,183 69.13% 17.559.917 37.528.591 1.796.592 4.79% a Less: Revenues (4.730,000) (2,374,168) 50.19% (2,355,832) (2,517,433) 143.265 5.69% Net J.0.Expenses $ 52.155,100 $ 36,951,015 70A5% $ 15.204,085 $ 35,011,158 $ 1,939,857 5.54% r Section 2- Page 7 L 2001 -02 Third Quarter Report i Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process w For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 u Increase Increase Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) 03/31/02 03041101 $ % Treatment Process: Preliminary Treatment $ 3,806.451 $ 3260.939 $ 545.512 16.73% 1 ; wi Primary Treatment 2,811,182 2.847.462 (36.280) -1.27% Secondary Treatment 2.280.504 '1,884,156 396.348 21.04% v Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 417,954 381.904 36,050 9.44% - Effluent Disposal 317,102 274,542 42.560 15.50% yr Solids Handling 14,975.944 13.864,000 1,111,944 8.02% 66 Cogeneration 5,630,267 5,745.873 (115,606) -2.01% Utilities 975,154 682.628 292,526 42.85% W Electrical Distribution 484,064 356,317 127,747 35.85% u Miscellaneous Buildings 3,135,503 2,710228 425,274 15.89% Air Quality 1,042,748 1,043,467 (709) -0.07% u Laboratory 3,448,310 4,477,084 (1,028.774) -22.98% i Net Joint Operating Requirements 39,325,183 37.528,591 1,796,592 4.79% iw Less: Revenues (2,374,168) (2,517.433) 143.265 -5.69% Net Joint Operating Expenses $ 36,951.015 $ 35,011,158 $ 1,939,857 5.54% W W W W 6+ W Section 2-Page 8 W Joint Operating Budget Review .. Staffing Trends Full Time Equivalents March 31, 2002 r r 800 674 560 549 ti 519 510 ti 450 6130/96 6/30196 ■Actual ■vawl 6/30/01 331/02 r �r At March 31, 2002, the total head count was 525 employees, or a full time equivalency of 515.75. Section 2- Page 9 ^^i l 0&Ged-Z S l !^^f ' I ! I r, �1 Nuel8 ua-1 Alleuol;uejul abed SI41 r n ii iY II podeM jopent) paiyl ZO- 600Z CIP Review .+ Capital Improvement Program By Type and Funding Source For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 f5.B48.161 ELSII,BY] P6mery Tmal enY � fl,]I LE82 Trell%MI Tnalmenl HeeEwMf 3% WIN. 3 Sdidf Hmging8 f6,822,]23 Oip"Hw 13% CalemW. FetlbOu 13% ".60.965 E1,R],Aa PoIX C.—Oudell arr/ Yfar Tre9lmerll Sy9lemaB% P,gecle 2% y,��arfYn °rv". $1,3]3.090 E1,8B6A43 U101V SO%-3% EBwpmen4% Arf $1.7N.630 OdIXC 'M Rele.d P,q...3% U M7,Ie2 E1,SW,631 ANgnallm/ Warar MvuOamanl CwnWlerlu0m]% �, Prgecls l]% E2,111,313 Ef,312A19 Pr ft R81WW M11®I1enwue6 span.,P,g..t 3uppwP q.c,e <% az Total Capital Improvement Expenditure-$52,975,636 $22,146.373 RBpl...W Rehabililelim 62% $12.95].69] _ Improved ealmanl S6A37,SfiB - 2a°A S 12% 12% $11,434,00 _. Add,li-al cnpecny 221. Total Capital Improvement Expenditure - $52,975,636 Section 3- Page 1 2001 -02 Third Quarter Report fJ Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year L For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Revised 2001-02 2001-02 2001-02 u Cashl Actual at Projected Budget 03/31/02 Outlay I t Collection System Improvement Protects I 1 Cielle On ctl9 U Santa And Trunk Serer Rehab. $ 441.000 b 230.986 S 240.000 Carbon Canyon 0am Interceptor Parallel Sewer 51,000 2.892 10,000 I / Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump Sin.Abandonment 322,000 43.532 51,600 U Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer 1,000,000 37,211 536,e00 Santa Are River Interceptor Realignment and Protec 518,000 (1,759,794) 1,028,800 Abandonment of the Existing SARI in SA River - - - I I Taft Brancli Improvements - - - Ill Alwootl Subtrenk Improvements 334,000 18,151 180,800 Replacement of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Siphon 158,Ooo 193.731 230,000 1' Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer 1200,000 74,900 IWOW VI Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Think Sewer 1,179.000 - - Rehabilitation of the Westede Pump Station 129,000 12,904 27,500 Lining of 24'NPTB FM(Juno Box W 2nd Angle Pt.) 909,000 Relaxation of Lido Pump Station 139,000 29,785 3.430.100 y Big Canyon Oftener Sewer Rehabilitation 541,000 3,649 10,000 Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sewer 2.461,00 5,249,421 6,326.900 Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station 28g000 59,180 75.000 Replacement of the Rocky Pant Pump SWUM 51B4O00 37,958 51,000 V Rehabilitation of the 141h Street Pump Station 158.000 502,$U 525,000 Rehabilitation of Me'A'Street Pump Station 128'wo 184,665 MAN j Rehabilitation of the Bay Bridge Pump Sudden 131,000 4,624 58,900 U Rehabilitation of go Crystal Cove Pump$MWn 71,000 8,387 28,700 Abandonment of AS Think.Watson and Cal.Sewers 306.000 66.867 $8,300 Newland Street lntereptor Sewer Protection 69.000 5,220 f0,000 Warner Avenue Relief Sewer 2,653,ODU 150,381 1T5,000 Y Lateral and Sewer Abandonment at Pacific Coast Hwy, 14,000 - - Rehabilitation of ibe Edinger Pump Station 152,000 5,236 50,001) Facilities Engineering Projects-Collec0 ms 300,000 - 256,000 Additional Charges(a CIP Closed at 6/30101 134,314 140,000 Let Subtotal-Collections 14,166,000 5,305,037 13,859,814 _ Revenue Area T U Covey Lane Pump Seem Abandonment in,OW 13,329 20,00) Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 401.000 111,545 288,000 College Ave Pump Station Parallel Force Main 393,000 5,083 10,000 { 1 Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach'A' 258l 130.W1 150,000 u Gisler-Redhill System Improvements,Reach'B' 64,000 9,316 141,000 Tustin Trunk Improvements 53.000 180 1,00g II i Grange Think Improvements 234,000 89.493 100,000 Y West ThiM Improvements 13,000 60 2,000 Gisler-RedhiIVNOM Trunk Improvements 369,000 74,430 125,000 Relaxation of the Michelson Pump Station 217,000 - - Modd¢atiene to the Main Street Pump Station "S.000 133 1,000 L l Additional Charges to CIP Closed at W30101 3,416 10,000 Subtotal-Revenue Areal 2573.001) 437,826 M8,000 Revenue Area 14 u Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 6130101 7,514 10,000 Total Collection System Improvement Projects 16.739,000 5750,377 14 71 T.600 L Section 3-Page 2 L.V CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Revised 20a1-02 2001-02 2001-02 Cashflow Aclualat Projected Budget 03/31102 Outlay w. Treatment&Disposal Prolects Collections Facilities Pumpstalion SCADA Communiations Study 80,000 - 10,000 Think Sewer Mapping Project 655,000 469.178 695,400 Rehab 8 Upgrade of Ellis Ave.Pump Station 80,000 329 1,000 Bushard Think Sewer Rehebildolion 2,358,000 702.839 9g950o Subtotal-Collections Facilll 3,173,000 1,172,346 1,675,900 Headworks Grit Auger Replacement 56,000 45.151 56.100 PLC Programming and Integration 391.000 2254 5.000 Sunflower Drive Replacement 394.000 242,719 399.800 Headworks RetablgtatioNRefurbishmenl 47,000 28.650 92,700 Headworks Improvements at Plant No,2 5,146,000 1.166.996 1,825.100 Plant No,2 Headwell Pilot Testing Program 512.D0D 225,892 300.000 sw Subtotal-Haadwwks 6.516,000 1.711,662 2678700 Primary Treatment Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 306.000 467,702 475.000 sr Pd.Clarifiers 16-31 8 Related Facililies 3265.000 5.365.890 8.447.000 Waste Selesueam Pump Stalker Upgrade 265.000 - 10.000 Primary Treatment RehablRefmb 138,00D 227 1,000 Circular Clarifier Drive ReplacemenWpgrade 1,147.000 10,915 84,000 Sludge Density Meter Upgrades 403.000 1,291 4.000 Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation 205,000 136 5,000 Subtotal-Primary Treatment 5.729,000 5,846,161 9.026.000 Secondary Treatment Sec.Treat.Monitoring 8 Cold Sys.Upgrade 96,000 6.420 10,000 Rehab Trickling Filters 8 Construct New Clarifiers 11000.000 1,278,265 1,300,000 r Activated Sludge Plant Rehsbdilation 100.000 12.076 15.000 Secondary Plant Rehabilitation 18,000 4,7r6 155.000 Oxygen Plant ReplacementRehabilitabon Assess 9Q000 530 72,000 Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study 560.000 3,655 70,000 AS Clan<er Equipment Replacement 450.000 206.205 300.000 Computer Modeling of Activated Sludge System a5,000 Subtoal-Secondary Treatment 2,399,000 1,511,927 1.922.000 w Solids Handling 8 Digestion Dewatenng Bell Press Rebuild 103.000 124.877 150.000 New Belt Filtrate Clarifier 47.000 - Rehabdradonof Digesters at Plant No.2 3.762,000 2,146,514 3265.600 Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility 8,251.000 4,154,327 5.259,900 Digestion B Dewalering RehebJRefurbishment 144,OD0 - Dewatering Bell Press Extension 222,000 13,840 15.000 High Rate Digester Mu Pumps Mach.Seals 197.000 85,633 100,000 Derwatemg Ball Press Rebuild 218.000 103.261 114,700 Sludge GnMer Replacement 193.000 7.418 15.000 Tub Ranch AcquisitieNBioschas Management Needs 6,350,000 132.413 200.000 Compost Facility 19.663.000 25.000 501000 DesigMnstall Ultrasonic Sludge Treatment Process 732,000- Subtotal-Solids Handling 801gestion 39,11R.000 6,795,283 9,170200 we Section 3-Page 3 r W 2001-02 Third Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Revised W 2001-02 2001-02 2001-02 CashBmv Actual at Projected Budget OW31102 outlay Ocean OWfall Systems J investigation and Repair or Ocean Oudall 210A00 288,508 270,000 Ouffel Flow Meter Replacement 947,000 520,330 1,135,700 Peak Flow Management 516.000 43.563 118,3UU Effluent Pumping Station Annex 1,0nA0o 1,019,400 1,3a4,000 W HB Shoreline Contamination Investigation Phase III 4,272,900 2,546,241 4,303.300 NPDES Permit Renewal 337.000 244.923 337.000 ' - Subtotal-Ocean Outfall Systems 7.359.900 4,640,965 7,548,300 lad Utility Systems Electrical Pourer System Studies 328,000 283.063 325.000 Standby Poser and Reliability Modifications 1,067.000 713,180 3.684,600 W Cable Troy Improvements at Plante i&2 908,000 34,703 50.000 Central Generation Automation 441,OOU 53.577 294,700 Gas Compressor Addition at Plant No.2 197,000 7,315 9.700 Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment 240.000 281.202 512,200 60 UndergmuM Storage Tank Leak Detection Upgrade 120.000 - 10,000 Electrical Equipment Refurbishment and Protection 99,000 - - -- Phone System Upgrade Plants 1&2 199,U00 I Subtotal-UOIIty Systems 3,589,000 1.373,040 4,Ba6,400 Odra Control Related Projects Facilities Modi(cations for Odor Control 62.= 144,013 150,000 d Facilities Modifications for Odor Control 469,000 258,956 260,000 Comprehensive Odor Control Assessment 73,000 142,905 145,000 - - ScrubbefMoniterandCivil Project 794,000 826,864 1,931,000 1 i Rehabilitation of Odor Control Facilifles 370.000 - - W Chemical Fac00y Mods.at Plant No.1 330,000 395.892 400,000 Subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 2,098,000 1,766.630 2,886,000 Plant Automation&ComFulerio8on aj Povmr Monitoring and Contra Systems - 1,500 _ Plant ReinwmtioNAu[omallon Pmjed 1.953.000 1,692,040 1,799.700 Document Management 146,000 54.915 75.000 W Records Management Program 229.000 10.048 25.000 Data Integration 353,000 392.418 425.000 Slratagic Information Amhllecture(SIA) 70,000 106,450 140,000 CMMS Programming 99.000 41,311 60.000 4rJ Intranet Application Development 117.000 1.003 116.400 Voice-Data Building Reviling 82,000 62,5% 82,000 Internet E-mail Browsing(Weleate) 32,000 12.536 31,900 '� Source Control Programming 231400 140.072 238,500 Gecgmphic Information System 45,000 9,724 10,000 Field Fiber Optic Upgrades 402,000 188.151 200,000 SCAM Communication.-Ethernet Study 147,000 - y Replacement of Interplant Fiber Optics 463,000 29,727 60,000 Windows 2000 Migration 295,00D 267,291 270.000 -' SCADA Graphics Tagging Update 607,000 1,056 10,000 Financial Information System Upgrade 236.000 400.173 550,000 Information Technology Disasmr Recovery 134,000 27,359 30,000 Network Equipment Upgrade 1.152,000 113A31 1,363,000 Subtotal-Plant Automation IS Coarueriration 6.794.000 3.550.921 5.478.300 iu Section 3- Page 4 W CIP Review ray, Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Current Year For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Revised r 200142 2001.02 2011 Castile. Actual at Projected Budget 03/31/02 Outlay r Process Related Special Products Effluent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives Plan 250.000 7,542 20.000 Standard SpecKcalmns Revisions and Updates 20.000 6.868 10,000 Thermal Insulation Management Program 353.000 609 10,000 r. Plant O 8 M Manual and SOP Project-Phase 1 690.000 9,227 30.400 Hasrdous Energy Control Procedures 360,000 23.916 35.000 Asset Management Program 280,000 45.789 60,000 Spacial Projects 2,352,000 ?017,361 2.3D0.000 Subtotal-Process Related Special Projects 4,225,000 2,111,312 2,465,400 Miscellaneous a Support Projects Continuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 451,000 - - Phase 2 Corosion Assessment 97.000 - - FacilitlesEngineedngProjects-Joint 900,000 700,241 2,000,500 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 900,000 426,361 2.418,200 sat Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 2 900,000 793.603 1.863.200 Interim Fee Record 8 Eng Data Syst Must Services 202.000 209.323 225.000 Area Classification Studies 1,950,000 511,532 600,000 Strategic Plan-Phase 2 62.000 62,222 63,000 Supplement No.1 to the INS Strategic Plan EIR 146,000 48,425 78.900 Long Range Slovakia Management Plan 272,000 4,371 20.000 WAC Equipment Replacement at Plants No.t and 2 1,123,000 959,128 1,021,200 Landscape and IMgation at Plant No.2 86.000 1051105 116,200 Security System Improvements 620.000 103,605 150,000 Smell Cap.Equip.Replacement Project 750.D00 212.084 491,700 Warehouse Reinvention Project 296,000 21.194 25,000 r Process Safety Management Compliance Pmgmm 60.000 Plume Modeling 121,000 95.075 121,000 O B M Ulwary Flooring 8 Shelving 64.000 - - Strategic Plan Update 440,000 30,204 200,000 Subtotal-Miscellaneous B Support Projects 9.440,o0D 4,312,479 9,393,900 Water Management Projects Groundwater Replenishment System 28,195,000 5.993,985 9.896,900 Water Conservation 560,000 491.208 613,100 Coop Plosel In0gw/Infiit.Reduction 4,213,000 1.137.391 2.944.000 Long Term Permanent Monitoring Program 3,375,000 1.624.578 3,159,300 ass Subtotal-Water Management Projects 34,343,000 9,237,142 16,612,300 Additional Charges to CIP Completed at 8130101 1,297.348 1,300,000 Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 125AN.900 45,328,816 75.043A00 Capital Equipment Purchases 4,169,000 1,696,443 2,869.000 r Total Collections and Treatment 8 Disposal Projects and Capital Equipment Purchases 5146585900 $52,975,636 $92.630,200 r yr Section 3 - Page 5 2001-02 Third Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life J For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Current Total 1I 1. Approved June 30.2001 Year Projected Remaining iJ Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Coat June 30,2002 Budget Collect[..System Im.r.vemant Protects Collections Sane Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab. $ 7,494,000 $ 164,142 $ 240,000 $ 394,149 $ 7A99,851 _ Carbon Canyon Dam Interceptor Parallel Sewer 5.0100D0 161,252 10,000 171.252 4.836.748 Carbon Cnyn Sewer and Pump San.Abandonment 3.564.000 123.358 51,600 174,966 3,389.044 W Santa Me River Interceptor Relief Sewer 11,056,000 237,445 536,600 774,045 10,281,955 Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and PmtK 94,935,000 3.492.214 1,028,800 4,521.014 80,413,986 - - Abandonment of the Existing SARI In SA River 8,44g000 - - - 5,444.00D Taft Branch Improvements 4.500.000 9.386 - 9,386 4,490,614 kau Alwaod Subbunk Improvements 1,708,000 92.201 180.300 273,001 1.434.999 Replacement of Mllter4lolder Trunk Sewer Siphon 1,616,000 960,434 230,000 1,190.41M 425,565 - ' Orenge-Wastem Subbunk Relief Sewer 1.330.000 138.S34 100,000 238.534 1,091.466 W Rehabiliation of the Magnolia Trunk Seger 26.645.000 - 26,645,000 Rehabilitation of the Westside Pump Sudan 1.819,000 78.496 27,50D f05,998 1.513.004 Lining of 24-NPTB FM(Juror Box to 2nd Angle PI.) 909.000 - - 909,000 Relocation of Lido Pump Seen, 3.688.000 116,883 3.430.100 3,646,983 139.017 1,w Big Canyon OBsite Sewer RellaEillhaon 2.714,000 17.434 10,000 77.434 2.686,566 Replacement of Back Bay Trunk Sever 8.095.000 473,082 6,326,900 6.799,982 1,295,018 - Replacement of the Bihar Point Pump Bunion 3,560.000 129.962 75.000 204,962 3.355.038 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station 4,399,000 85.029 51,000 136.029 4,262,971 'y Rehabilitation of are 14Ih Street Pump Sedan 2.211,000 122,237 525.000 647.237 1,563,763 Rehabiliation of Me W Street Pump Station 2,848.000 682,352 229.600 011.952 1,936.048 Rehabilitation of We Bey Bridge Pump Station 1,194,000 41.112 58,900 100.012 1.093,988 W Rehabilitation of Me Crystal Cove Pump Station 526,000 47,254 28,700 75.954 450,046 Abandonment of AB Trunk,Watson and Cal.Sewers 2,634,000 162.740 88,300 271.040 2,362,950 - NevdandStreetlntemperSewerProtemion 144.OD0 - 10,000 10,000 134,00D Warner Avenue Relief Sever 4.898,000 335,734 175,000 510,734 4.387,266 W Lateral and Sewer Abandonment at Pacific Coast Nvy. 14,000 - - 14,000 Rehabilitation of the Edinger Pump Sation 1.483,000 49.951 50.000 99.951 1.383.049 Facilities Engineering Propmis-COIkWons 5,400,000 256.000 255,000 5,144,000 Additional Charges to CUP Closed at WMI 7,020,004 140.001) 7,760,004 (7,760,000 w Subtotal-Collections 202638000 15,351,241 13,859,800 29,211,041 173,424.959 Revenue Area Covey lane Pump Station Abandonment 141,000 - 20.D00 20,000 121,000 Sunfiowar Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 5.387.000 200.985 288.D00 488,985 4.898.015 College Ave Pump Station Parallel Forty Mein 1.886.000 83,119 10,000 93.119 1.792.851 Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements,Reach w 4.025,000 154.439 150,000 304,439 3.720.561 1W Gisler-Redhill System Improvements.Reach-W 5,013,000 9.953 141,000 150.953 4.862.047 Tustin Trunk Improvements 3.656.000 8,450 1,000 9,450 3.648.550 '- OrangeTrunkImprovements 3.942.000 143.106 100,000 243,106 3,698,894 West Tmnk Improvements 496.000 1,989 2.000 3.909 492,011 Gisler-RadhillO4aM Trunk lmprovemenls 5.704,000 208.055 125,000 331,055 5,372,945 Relocation of the M"alson Pump Station 1,045,000 379 379 1,044,621 Modifications to the Main$beet Pump SeOon 445,000 1,00D 1,000 444.000 W Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 6/30I01 160,258 10.00D 170,256 (170,ZS8) Subtotal-Revenue Area 31,740,000 958743 848.000 1,81%743 29,923,257 - - Revenue Area 14 ts.l Additional Charges to CIP Closed at 613W01 301,915 10,000 311,915 (311,915) Total Collection System Improvement Pr.jsote 234.376,000 16,621,899 14,717,800 31,339,699 203,036,301 W Section 3-Page 6 CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements-Project Life For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Current Total Approved June 30,2001 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cost June 30.2002 Budget Treatment&Disposal Protects ..a Collections Facilities Pumpatallon SCADA Communlatlons Study 80,01M - 10,000 10,000 70,000 Trunk Sewer Mapping Project 1,709,000 627 695.400 696,027 1.012,973 ,r Rehab&Upgrade of Ellis Ave.Pump Station 1,606.000 1.728 1,00D 2,728 1,603,272 Busham Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 33,706,000 805.452 969,500 1,774,952 31.931,048 Sublolal-Collections Facilities 37,101,000 807,807 1,675,900 2,483,707 34,617,293 Headworks GM Auger Replacement 1.131,000 1.015,925 56,100 1.075,025 55,975 PLC Pmgmmming and Integration 395.000 688 5.000 5,686 389,314 SunOower Drive Replacement 815,000 181,197 399,800 580,997 34,003 Houdworks RelabllltalbnlRafurblshment 11,348,000 32,257 92,700 124.07 11,221,043 Headwo u;Improvements at Plant No.2 160,130,000 862,856 1.825.100 2,687,956 157.442,044 Plant No.2 Headworlm Pilot Tasting Pmgrem 623,000 3.857 300,000 303,857 318143 r Subtotal-Heaoworks 174,240,000 2,099,778 2,878,700 4,778,478 159461522 Primary Treatment Facilities Modifications for Dow Control 791,000 285,129 475.000 760,129 30.871 Pd.Clarifiers 16.31&Related Facill6es 75.450,000 4,566.957 8.447,000 13,015.07 62,434,043 Waste Sidestreem Pump Station Upgrade 1.069.000 10,000 10.000 11059.000 Primary Treatment RehablRafurb 11.904,000 227 1,00D 1.227 11.902,773 .,w Circular Clarifier Drive Replacement/Upgrade 5,840,000 - 84.000 $4,000 5.756.000 Sludge Density Meter Upgrades 800,000 - 4,000 4,000 796,ODD Sludge Level Measurement Device Installation 364.000 5.00(1 5,000 359,000 Subtotal-Primary Treatment 96.218.000 4,864,313 9,026,00D 13,880,313 82,337.687 r Secondary Treatment Sec.Treat Monitoring It Cntrl Sys,Upgrade 3.307.000 519,108 10,001) 529,108 2.777.892 Rehab Trickling Filters&Construct New Clarifiers 44,750,000 681,074 1.300,000 1,981,074 42.768,925 r Activated Sludge Plant Rehabilitation 15,150,000 16,000 15,000 15,135,000 Secondary Plant Rehabilitation 7,443,000 - 155,000 155,000 7,288,000 Oxygen Plant ReplacemeneRehabllitallon Assess 110.000 - 72,000 72,000 36,000 Activated Sludge Aeration Basin Selector Study 950,000 - 70.000 70,000 580,000 AS Clarifiar Equipment Replacement 480.000 - 300,000 300,000 180.000 Computer Modeling of Activated Sludge System 120,000 120.000 Subtotal•Secondary Treatment 72,310,000 1,200,182 1,922,000 3,122,182 69,187,818 Solids Handling&Digestion Dewatedng Belt Press Rebuild 528,000 433,838 1S0,000 583,838 (55,836) New Belt Filuate Cladfier 1,320,000 - - 1,320.000 Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No.2 15,154,000 11,117,441 3,265.600 14,383.041 770.959 Solids Storage and Track Loading Facility 14.950.000 5,676,060 5,259,900 10,935.960 4.014,040 Digestion&Dewatering Rehab.alefumishment 10,490,000 - - - 10.490,000 r Daviaterieg Belt Press Extension 230.000 7.469 15,000 22,469 207,531 High Rate Digester Mix Pumps Mech.Seals 517,000 359,799 100.000 459.799 57,201 Dmvalering Belt Press Rebuild 824,000 335.337 114.700 450,037 373.963 Sludge Grinder Replacement 224,000 191,579 16,000 205,679 17,421 r Tula Ranch AcquisitioNBbsolide Management Needs 9.900.000 66.017 200,000 266,017 9.633,983 Compost Facility 34,770.000 - 50.000 50.000 34,720,000 DosiBNlnstall Ultrasonic Sludge Treatment Process 2.600,000 2,600,000 Subtotal-Solids Handling&Digestion 91,507,000 0,187,540 9,170,200 27,357,740 64,149,260 �� Section 3-Page 7 L 2001 -02 Third Quarter Report Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements•Project Life For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Current Total W Approved June 30,2001 You Projected RemaiMng Project Accumulated Projected Dwl at Future - Budget Cost Cost June 30,20M Budget Ocean Oudall Sysbma �+ Investigation and Repair of Ocean Oudall 16.907.000 1240,458 270.000 1.510.458 15,396.542 Oudail Flow Male,Replacement 1,499.000 332.323 1,135.700 1.468.023 30.977 Peak Flow Management 12,381,000 319.743 118.300 438,043 11,942,957 V Effluent Pumping Station Annex 47,925,DOU 579,960 1,384,000 1,963,980 45.961,020 RB Stamina Contamination Investigation Phase III 5,196.60D 923,677 4.303.300 5.226.977 (30,377) NPDES Permit Renewal 337,000 337000 337,000 Subtotal-Ocean cattail Systems 84.245.600 3,396,181 7,548,300 10.944.481 73,301,119 Utility systems - Elecsal Power System Studies 321%000 2,153,278 325.000 2.478.276 737,724 SbMby Power and Reliability Modlfiallons 19.856.000 7,086,243 3.664.800 10.751,013 9,104,957 tw Cable Tray Improvements at Plants 1&2 26,778,000 1,035,444 50.000 1.065.444 25.60AN Central Generagon Automation 2.954.000 31.278 294,700 325.978 2.636,022 Gas Compressor Addilion at Plant No.2 2.592.000 54,338 9.700 64,038 2.527.962 Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment 3,794,000 315,801 512200 828.001 2,965.999 Underground Storage Tank Leak Detection Upgrade 120,000 - to.= 101000 110,000 - - ElecMwlEquipmentRefurbishmentandProtactiun 1,557,000 - - - 1,967.000 Phone System Upgrade Plants 1&2 199,000 199,000 W Subtotal-uti Systems 61,086,000 10,656,380 4,886,400 15,642,780 45,543,220 Odor Control Related Projects Facilities Modifications for Odor Central 300,000 229,458 16D.000 379,458 (79.458) W Facilities Modifications for Odor Cartel 2,732,000 297,901 260.000 557.901 2,174,099 Comprehensive Odor Control Assessment 1,112.000 1.031,804 145,000 lA76,804 (64.804) Scrubber Monitor and Control Proles 2,382,000 226,971 1.931.000 2,157,971 224,029 16W Rehabilitation of Odor Cartel Facilities 29.870,000 - - - 29.870.DDD Chemical Facility Mods.at Plant No.1 4,536,000 4,058,375 400,000 4,458,375 77.625 Subtotal-Odor Control Related Projects 40,932,000 5.844.509 2,886,000 8,730,509 32,201,491 v Plant Automation 8 Computerization Povor Monitoring and Control Systems 3.728.000 24.177 1,800 25.977 3,702,023 Plant ReinvenllondAulamalien Project 25,760,000 9,186.291 1,799,700 1o,985,991 14,774,009 Document Management s64p00 541.568 75,000 616,568 247,432 Records Management Pmgmm 446,000 206,560 25,000 231,560 214,440 Data Integration 4.334.000 2.220.640 425,000 2.645,640 1.688.360 Strategic Information Architecture(SIA) 724,000 301.955 140,00D 441.956 282,045 Gums Programming 490,000 290.157 60.000 350.157 139,843 Intranet Application Development 300,0110 $5.584 116,400 201.984 98.016 -, VolooData Building Rewiring 138,000 560.204 82,000 742,204 (604,2(4) Internet E-mail Broeeing(Websile) 300,000 183.117 31.900 215,017 84.983 lw Source Control Programming 1,104,ODD 426.493 238,500 664,993 439,007 Geographic Information System 4,157.000 316,272 10,000 326.272 3.830.728 Fiats Fiber Optic Upgrades 403.000 262.480 200,000 482,480 (59.480) W SCADA Communications-Ethernet Study 158.000 310 - 310 157.690 Replacement of Interplant Fiber Optics 497.000 33.032 50.000 83.032 413,969 _ Wmr loos 2000 Migration 333,000 44.930 270.000 314,930 18.070 SCADA Graphics Tagging Update 670,000 41,984 10.000 51,964 fill W Financial Information Syrian Upgrade 1,825.000 286.987 550,000 836,957 988.013 Information Technology Disaster Recovery 139.000 5,563 30,000 35,553 103,447 NeNvork Equipment Upgrade 2,443,000 1,363,000 1,363,000 1,080,000 Subtotal-Plant Automation&Computerization 48.813.000 15.118,294 5,478,300 20.596.594 28,216,406 Id Section 3-Page 8 ow CIP Review Summary of Capital Improvement Construction Requirements -Project Life For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Current Total Approved June 30,2001 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Costal Future Budget Cost Cost June 30,2002 Budget r Proms Raised Special Projects Effluent Pathogen Reduction Altamatives Plan 250,000 - 20,000 20,000 2W,00D Standard Speci0w4ons Revisions and Updates 200,000 455,362 10,0m 465.362 (265,362) Thermal Insulation Management Program Sell 751 1D,000 10.751 789,249 ,.a Plant 0 8 M Manual and SOP Project-Phase 1 4,000,000 1,60o 3D,400 32.000 3,968,000 Hazardous Energy Contra)Procedures 1,190,000 242,083 35,000 277.083 912,917 Asset Management Program 870,000 - 5Dp00 60,000 810,00D Special Projects 9.852,000 1,228,948 2,30D.000 315W.948 6,323,052 r Subtotal-Process Related Special Projects 17,10,000 1,928,744 2,465,400 4,394,144 12.767,858 Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects Continuous Feed Chemical Treatment Facility 451,000 - - - 451,00D Phase 2 Corrosion Assessment 87.000 - - - 87.000 Facilities Engineering Projects-Joint 18,200,000 899,488 2.000,500 2,899,988 15.300.012 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant) 18 mo.0m 481.753 2.418.200 2.899.953 15,300,047 Facilities Engineering Projects-Plant 2 18.200.000 1.036,752 1,863,200 2.899,952 15,W0,D48 Interim Fac Record 8 Erg Data Sysl Main Services 370,000 2,827 225,000 227,827 142.173 Area Classification Sludles 29,345,000 2,873,622 Sidi 3,473,6M 25.871.378 Strategic Plan-Phase 2 2,088,000 2,093,127 83000 2.156.127 (68,127) Supplement No.1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR 148.000 1,129 78,900 80.029 67,W1 Lang Range Biosolids Management Plan 332.000 - 20.000 20.000 312,000 WAC Equipment Replacement at Plants No.1 allot 2 1,206000 64,841 1,021,200 1,086,041 119,S59 r L.arldscape and ingaban at Plant No.2 810.000 60,843 116,200 1T7,043 632,957 Security System Improvements 1,334,000 614,957 19D.000 764,987 569,033 Small Cap.Equip.Replacement Project 2,750,000 508,265 491.700 999.965 1,750.036 Warehouse Reinverl6on Project 600,000 I'M8 25p00 26,268 573,732 r Process Safety Management Compliance Program 60,000 - - - 60.000 Plume Modeling 121,000 121.000 121,000 0 8 M I.ibrary Flooring 8 Shelving 144,000 - - 144,000 Strategic Plan Update sdil 20D.000 200.000 240,000 Subtotal•Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects 94.886,000 8.538,882 9,393.900 18,032,782 76,853,218 Water Management Prelates s Groundvrater Replenishment System 182,700,000 4.090,087 9,895.900 13,985.987 10.714.013 Water Conservation 4,644,000 1.528.886 613,100 2,141,986 2.502.014 Comp Projects.IntawaMllt.Reduction 142,676,000 2,328,985 2,941,0M 5,272,965 137,403.015 Long Term Permanent Monier,Program 7,074,00D 255,706 3,159,300 3,415,006 3,658,994 r Subotal-Water Management Projects 337,094,000 8,203,664 16,612,300 24,815,964 312,278,036 Additional Charges to CIP Completed at W30101 67,240,236 1,300,000 58,540,236 (58,540,236) r Total Treatment and Disposal Projects 1.155.594.600 138,176,510 75,11 213.219,910 942,374,690 Capital Equipment Purchases 4,169,000 2,869,000 2,869.000 1.3011,000 Total Collections and Treatment 8 Disposal Projects and Capital Equipment Purchases $1,394,139.600 $1547%409 $92,6311 $24 4428.609 $1,146710,991 Section 3- Page 9 2001-02 Third Quarter Report w W W W This Page Intentionally Left Blank W W w LW w W it Section 3-Page 10 yW Budget Review by Revenue Area All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Operating Budget Review r 2001-02 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget CASH RECEIPTS: Tax AllocationslSubvenlions(Share of 1%) $ 38,153.000 $ 26.181.870 $ 11,971,130 68.62% Connection Fees 5,824,000 5.845.532 (21,532) 100.37% Other User Fees 85,081,000 48,567,336 36,513,664 57.08% ur Sale of Capacity Rights 61195,000 225 6,194,T75 0.00% Debt Proceeds 280,000,000 - 280,000,000 0.00% Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 38,314.000 18.358.841 19,955,159 47,92% ®' Total Receipts $ 453,567.000 $ 98,953,804 $354,613,196 21,82% CASH DISBURSEMENTS: ^+ Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 129,846,900 $ 47,226.259 $ 82,621.641 36.37% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 16,739,000 5,750,377 10,988.623 34.35% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 38.937,000 20,331.479 18,605,521 52,22% r Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 62,155,100 36,951,015 15,204,085 70.85% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 13.810,000 10.147,632 3,662.368 73A8% Total Disbursements $ 251,488,000 $120,405,762 $131,082.238 47.88% r Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07101/01 &Additions Fixed Assets 03131102 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 50.726,387 $ 5.750,377 $ - $ 56,476,764 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 94,078,221 47.225,259 - 141,303,480 Subtotal 144.804,608 52,976.636 197,780,244 PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 10,398,596 - - 10,398,596 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 366,916.487 - - 366,916,487 Treatment Facilities 607,730,120 - 607.730,120 r Disposal Facilities 90,161.861 - - 90.161,861 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 121,441,616 - - 121,441,616 Subtotal 1,196,648,600 - - 1,196,648,680 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1,341.453,288 $ 52,975.636 $ - $1,394,428,924 r r Section 4-Page 1 L 2001 -02 Third Quarter Report Consolidated Revenue Area Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 L Operating Budget Review i 2001-02 Year-To- Remaining Yearto-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget CASH RECEIPTS: Tax Alloca0ons/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 34,522,000 $ 23,749.222 $ 10,772,778 68.79% L Connection Fees 5,096,000 5,060,363 35,637 99,30% Other User Fees 68,916.000 43,511.613 25,404,387 63.14% Sale of Capacity Rights 5,402,000 - 5,402,000 - Debt Proceeds 250,000,000 - 250,000,000 0.00% Interest&Miscellaneous Revenue 34,460,000 15,405,816 19,054,185 44.71% Total Receipts $ 398.396,000 $ 87.727.013 $310,668,987 22.02% Ir CASH DISBURSEMENTS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 113,226.500 $ 41.005,692 $ 72,220,808 36.22% Yd Collection Activity Capital Improvements 14,167,000 5,305.037 8,861,963 37A5% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 36,121,000 19,025,289 17.095.711 52.67% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 45.479,800 32,248,898 13,230,902 70.91% v Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 10,862,000 7,886,274 2,975.726 72.60% Total Disbursements $ 219.856,300 $105,471,190 $114.385.110 47,97% Capital Facilities Budget Review W Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01101 &Additions Fixed Amato 03131102 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: t.l Collection Actv0y Construction In Progress $ 50.344,313 $ 5,305,037 $ $ 55,649.350 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 81.G78.231 41,005,692 122.683,923 V Subtotal 132.022,544 46,310,729 178.333,273 PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 7,565,914 - - 7,565,914 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 291,014.408 - - 291.014,408 Treatment Facilities 527,694,687 - - 627,694,687 Disposal Facilities 78,290,134 - - 78,290,134 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 105,868.633 105,868.633 Subtotal 1,010,433,776 1,010,433,776 W Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $1,142,456,320 $ 46,310,729 $ - $1,188,767,049 ia1 Section 4 -Page 2 W Budget Review by Revenue Area Revenue Area No. 7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 .,e Operating Budget Review 2001-02 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %of Budget CASH RECEIPTS: Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ 3,631,000 $ 2.432,648 $ 1,198,352 67.00% Connection Fees 728,D00 785.169 Other User Fees 8,366,000 5,D53,716 3,311,284 60A2% Sale of Capacity Rights 605,D00 225 604,775 - r Debt Proceeds 30.000,000 - 30,000,000 0.00% Interest B Miscellaneous Revenue 2,884,D00 1,070,946 1.813,054 37.13% Total Receipts $ 46,213,000 $ 9,342,704 $ 36,870,296 20.220A CASH DISBURSEMENTS: r Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 12,686,D00 $ 4.821.699 $ 7,864,301 38.01% Collection Activity Capital Improvements 2,572.000 437,826 2,134,174 17.02% COP Retirement and Interest Expense 2.816.000 1,306,190 1,509,810 46.38% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5,110,700 3,764,946 1.345,754 73.67% Revenue Area Operating&Other Expenses 2,592,000 1,936,541 655,459 74.71% Total Disbursements $ 25,776,700 $12.267.202 $ 13,509,498 47.59% m Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01101 &Additions Fixed Assets 03131102 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Collection Activity Construction in Progress $ 219,741 $ 437,826 $ - $ 657,567 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 9,613,050 4,821,699 14,434,749 Subtotal 9,832,791 5,259,525 15,092,316 PROPERTY,PLANT S EQUIPMENT(at cost): Land and Property Rights 2.329,402 - - 2,329,402 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 46.556,108 - - 46,556,108 Treatment Facilities 62.047,211 - - 62,047,211 Disposal Facilities 9,205.942 - - 9.205,942 General Plant and Administrative Facilities 12.092,070 - 12,092,070 d Subtotal 132.230,733 132,230.733 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $142,063.524 $ 5,259.525 $ $147,323,049 Section 4- Page 3 L 2001-02 Third Quarter Report Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review V For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 v Operating Budget Review 2001-02 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date W Budget Date Budget %of Budget CASH RECEIPTS: , Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) $ - $ - $ - N/A u Connection Fees - - - WA Other User Fees 7,800,000 2,007 7,797,993 0.03% Sale of Capacity Rights 188,000 188,000 0.00% Debt Proceeds - - - WA Interest 8 Miscellaneous Revenue 970,000 1,882,080 (912,080) 194.03% Total Receipts $ 8,958,000 $ 1,884,087 $ 7.073,913 21.03% V CASH DISBURSEMENTS: Share of Joint Works Capital Improvements $ 3,934,400 $ 1,397.868 $ 2,536,532 35.53% W Collection Activity Capital Improvements - 7.514 (7,514) N/A COP Retirement and Interest Expense - - - N/A Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,564.600 937,171 627,429 59.90% v Revenue Area Operating 8 Other Expenses 356,000 324,817 31.183 91.24% Total Disbursements $ 5.855.000 $ 2,667,370 $ 3.187.630 45.56% V Capital Facilities Budget Review 6J Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 07/01/01 &Additions Fixed Assets 03131102 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: vj Collection Activity Consin ction in Progress $ 162,333 $ 7,514 $ - $ 169.847 Share of Joint Works Treatment Plant CIP 2,786,940 1,397,868 - 4,184,808 Subtotal 2,949,273 1,405,382 4,354,655 PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIPMENT(at well: Land and Property Rights 503,280 - - 503,280 Collection Lines and Pump Stations 29,345,971 - - 29,345,971 Treatment Facilities 17,988,222 - - 17,988,222 Disposal Facilities 2,665,785 - - 2,665,785 �+ General Plant and Administrative Facilities 3.480,913 3,480,913 Subtotal 53.984,171 63,964,171 y Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP $ 56.933,444 $ 1,405,382 $ $ 58,338,826 V Ld Section 4- Page 4 W Self Insurance Review General Liability Fund Budget Review For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 2001-02 Through Through 2001-02 Through Increase Budget 03131102 03131/02 Budget 03131101 (Decrease) Revenues: In-Lieu Premiums $1,246,500 $ 934,875 75.00% $311,625 $ 934,875 $ - Interest&Miscellaneous 80.000 21,531 26.91% 58,469 72,157 (50,626) Allocation from Other Funds 500.000 381,299 76.26% 118,701 68,669 312,630 Total Revenues 1,826,500 1,337,705 73.24% 488,795 1,075,701 262,004 Expenses: Benefits/Claims 300,000 140.035 46.68% 159,965 17,553 122,482 Contractual Services 3,5D0 900 25.71% 2,600 900 - .� Legal Services 500,000 335,453 67.09% 164.547 234,126 101,327 Professional Services 5,000 1,094 21.88% 3,906 5,086 (3,992) Supplies&Other - - NIA - - - SeMceDepartmenlAllocation 1,000,000 1,169,145 116.91% 169,145 1,233,567 (64,422) Subtotal 1,808,500 1,646,627 91.05% 161,873 1,491.232 155,395 Excess Loss Policy 112,000 83,937 74.94% 28,063 75,575 8,362 r Total Expenses 1,920.500 1,730,564 90.11% 189.936 1,566,807 163.757 Excess Revenue(Expenses) (94,000) (392.859) 417.94% E 298.859 (491.106) 98.247 Beginning Reserves 1.156,900 1,154.388 1,809.121 (654.733) Ending Reserves $1,062,900 $ 761.529 $1.318.015 $(556.486) r Section 5-Page 1 2001-02 Third Quarter Report Workers'Compensation Fund Budget Review Ir For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 W Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 2001-02 Through Through 2001-02 Through Increase Budget 03131/02 03/31/02 Budget 03/31/01 (Decrease) Revenues: In-Lieu Premiums $317,600 $238,200 75.00% $ 79,400 $232,500 $ 5,700 u Interest&Miscellaneous 35,000 9,228 26.37% 25.772 35,540 (26.312) u Total Revenues 352,600 247,428 70.17% 105.172 268.040 120.6121 Expenses: r Benefits/Claims 250,000 260.691 104.28% (10,691) 297,542 (36,851) Contractual Services 25,000 20,704 82.82% 4,296 18,750 1,954 W Legal Services 30,000 18.280 60.93% 11,720 16,244 2.036 Professional Services 35,000 28,400 81.14% 6,600 8,553 19,847 Supplies&Other - - N/A - - - W Service Department Allocations 50,000 20,232 40.46% 29,768 60,282 (40,050) Subtotal 390,000 348.307 89.31% 41,693 401,371 (53.064) W Excess Loss Policy 35,000 28,875 82.50% 6,125 25.927 2.948 Total Expenses 425,000 377,182 88.75% 47,818 427,298 (50,116) r Excess Revenue(Expenses) (72,400) (129,754) 179.22% $ 57,354 (159,258) 29,504 Beginning Reserves 89,100 109,742 302,064 192,322 W Ending Reserves $ 16.700 $ (20.0121 142 808 $1162.8181 u W V rr W Section 5-Page 2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (714)962-2411 Mailing Address: P.O. Boa 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Street Address: I0844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 OCSD3131/02