Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-03-27 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT March 21, 2002 Phn.e: NOTICF OF ME TIN . 1714)9622411 v 17141 962M56. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT mafib,y."re..: Pn. Box 8127 Faano.m vaile,u WEDNESDAY MARCH 27, 2002 - 7.00 P M 9272E-0127 were dd.: 'W"elis Avenue Faun 92708 7018 DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue 001 h ' Fountain Valley, California 92708 Agents. The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation .it District will be held at the above location, time and date. Mahan Brea Buena Park ,yI Fount n�oarasa ^ V lley Fullerton Barden G e Bo d Secret Huntington Beech Irvine La Habra to Palma Los Nonroos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Tentatively- Scheduled tl r� .nmin9 Meebags Santa Ana Seal Beach Santa, Tustin ✓llla P.rk yarba Linda OMTS COMMITTEE -Wednesday,April 3,2002 at 5:00 p.m. County or orange PDC COMMITTEE -Thursday,April 4, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. sanitary Discritta JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Coate,easy any SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE - Monday,April 8,2002 at 5:30 p.m.@OCWD Coatemulw o. Water Di.tritc. FAHR COMMITTEE -Wednesday,April 10,2002 at 5:00 p.m. Irvme Ranch STEERING COMMITTEE -Wednesday,April 24, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. To m.intam warld-class lealarship,u wastewater and water resource m.nagement. nm BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting April April 24, 2002 May May 22, 2002 June June 26, 2002 July 'July 17, 2002 August August 28, 2002 September September 25, 2002 October October 23, 2002 November November 20 2002 December 'December 18, 2002 January January 22, 2003 February February 26, 2003 March March 26, 2003 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month WadonWaWl%%PAla%adminSSV*e a1 =Meeting NofimXMN2.2.dw ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 03/27/02 TIME: 7:00 o.m. (MURPHY)........................ ALVAREZ...................... — (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... �L ✓ — (FLORY) .......................... BANKHEAD.................... ✓ — (LARSON) ....................... BOYD............................. ✓ ✓ — (MILLER).......................... BRADY ........................ ✓ JG — — (BOARDMAN) ................. COOK, DEBBIE.............. — (CRANDALL).................... COOK, LAURANN.......... _✓�G — (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE..................... ✓�G — (UNDERHILL)................... ECKENRODE................. ✓ JC — — (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... y/ JG — (DUVALL)......................... 61 N................... ✓ �� — (DEBOLT)......................... JEMPSA...................... ✓ �G — (WORLEY)........................ KAWASHIMA............... --- (SMITH)............................ N—...................... —� ✓ — (BROADWATER) ............. LEYES.......................... � — (DALY).............................. MC CRACKEN............... ✓ ✓ _ (CHRISTY) ....................... MC GUIGAN.................. — (SIMONOFF).................... MOORE........................ — _ (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............. (FRESCHI) ....................... PATTERSON................. —L,:� (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ 1;L" ✓ — — (ADAMS) ......................... RIDGEWAY...................JL✓ — (DOW).............................. SIGLER......................... ��✓ — (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... .. ✓ (BLAKE)............................ WALKER....................... — STAFF: Anderson ✓ � . 0 '���„_ �� Ghirelli 7 Kyle Azklie Ludwin ✓ QLI� Rom✓ Mathews ✓ M /e* Miles ✓ mu MurphyQG�j t Ooten n a/� 7, Tomko Streed OTHERS: �N�� Woodruff l Andrus Nixon ,�ti ,�1"" 01/23/02 (� G:Wq.du\admin\BS\DIRECTOR\Oimc mRoll Call.Eoo SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 03 a17- D BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leas print / ( � U Sl~ � Su2F�la�et' zr'JCCNcPif nK' 00G r /rfS fAl UraD to airr �T Ct42+ 14I(- L HAWRDTAIADMIMBSTORMSISIGN-IN FORM= SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) WIL-4o o-i jl 3 HAWRDTAUDMINWWORM ZIGN-IN FORM.D REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: `7 �2 AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) /�ur,v o- K 4rd1` C P 2� `ly (city(zip code) ' TELEPHONE: ?/Y - � � 7 -Y Ydc�'? REPRESENTING: ff L/— (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: `3 �7 o Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) ir2e ES�� o.✓TWiP� HOME ADDRESS: 11��/`%/r� (number/street (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: �6 Z — �9Z - aS/O REPRESENTING: /oi✓c�-r� �FNc"+C/e.rs GGC', SVP�'u (self/name of organization) ea REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. J DATE: 7 Z AGENDA ITEM NO. v I/t rC `-0rnq NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) P�o 1� cw (city/zip code) r' TELEPHONE: C L � \� & REPRESENTING: DDT (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'Ali persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + NAME: (please print) ^Q--'e- ✓l /�/I. 4 ,rl�� G/ HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 6 7J REPRESENTING: G (self/name of org ization) t/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific Rem is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: S' 2?— �— AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) a �'^r y6/v HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: SU�{�,2/a(ee fyU� /fi+N11�..t:Jn,J�SQr�Sor�( �i' qr� (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) A<C- SA,M V L- I (,2. HOME ADDRESS: -t22- L&r- ST (number/street) (, (.IVNT-I"GT6+J GOAC14, C-4 aIZ(pLfO (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 7(Li 53(v 9�-95 REPRESENTING: S0W (self/name of organization) �/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 7—�7 02— AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) ale5 ZeZ41 SOa HOME ADDRESS: U2 2- /g / 1 t (number/street) ,#y,,V oN cfP , c 4 9z64g (city/zip code)TELEPHONE: 714f r7 3 6 75 /O 5 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 3 �� 7- G AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (City/zip coda) - TELEPHONE: —� - REPRESENTING: (2ZylP.fZ / �7,(���4—T�TPX � (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 2 0.7— AGENDA ITEM NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) Y^7�A-7-R hl A ✓_(Z R 19 H-r HOME ADDRESS: 17 3 Q / -S)?i�pA 4 AJ (number/street) 14l3 ` 1- (o °t9 (city/zipcode) TELEPHONE: 9" 16— 9 f 30 REPRESENTING: ZA /V L) l R v C 7- (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 3 -� / K/- V 2-- AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: ��JT" 7d /�UUL1/r'LfP/L/lfi= C[/�Cc_ (number/street) jrlj/-y q 2 7ee (city/zip de) TELEPHONE: / - �— wS/ REPRESENTING: ~ W &� (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: a� AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) Cc/ 16ZaL i HOME ADDRESS: Z-AZ (number/street) /-kvryl (cil /zip code) TELEPHONE: S 96 — 5-�'0-9 REPRESENTING: 5 Lz. (self/name of organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (n tuber/street) Al ( c ity/zip co e) q `- TELEPHONE: `'� 1'�+ ��• 11 `(��Q REPRESENTING: l.-. (self/name organization) / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 2 7 Z AGENDA ITEM NO. U 6- C-4 NC'Z S NAME: (please print) rNN( S HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) Ge)JL&-A Pgt- 012 2S (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organ' tion) ,4l re. REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HA:5 w 71, 'All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of genera inta est should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. --77 DATE: z7 G AGENDA ITEM NO.� NAME: (please print) /r2 HOME ADDRESS: �'/z (number/street) �'o�4nN�1 DAL /�.st/Z 9z 6Z57 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: OG +� a ✓�M�iV (self/name of orga ization) '� REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 3 v-Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) O HOMEADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of orgaeizat on REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: ZZ o2 AGENDA ITEM NO. C7 NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: /77C.2 ',�e?si✓aGi�G (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: 7fhfr9-q8 REPRESENTING: Is—eIv (self/name of organization) v REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPI QUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 3-Z7 -O L AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) Do 1Ml ka1+0 HOME ADDRESS: IU 2.o V4 V VI S- 1 (number/street) Se gna-ed., C/q- 9V (city/zip code)2 TELEPHONE: 57 2 - y(p�.36n-�2 l /6q T REPRESENTING: Gey,-" VUbIIC- (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 2 C All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of genera in erest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: 3-27-O L— AGENDA ITEM NO. I Z C NAME: (please print) Do u cr- Kd✓f` o HOME ADDRESS: IoLo "r�N (number/street) Se' - CA go7¢o (c i ty/zip code) p TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES RE must be given to the BoardSecretary prior to the meeting for distribution. 7 DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 NAME: (please print) �U lr� �'uR711-c HOME ADDRESS: 10Z.0 Rw1' V O-175A (number/street) Bee,,& g0746 (city/zip code) d TELEPHONE: Z-y✓���L I.�� REPRESENTING: S - // / 041( (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES RD) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution.. C /{� DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. �d �j' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) .Oc)06— Kd/{TNtF HOME ADDRESS: 1UZ6 Aft V)SJ)� (number/street) SEfx- 8EM& 2d-7�O (city/zip code) f TELEPHONE: Sa Z - y 30 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks will be limited to three minutes. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. / DATE: L7-O Z AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) Oa Y(r- KU2-iwur HOMEADDRESS: fou MAYC UJ'J?3 (number/street) 0 -f arc? YO (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: Y30' Zg 9T REPRESENTING: / YV6/l C (self/name organization) y ®m , BEYOND where? For your Free registration, H:aii Rcgcrcy Hmel please contact. Long Bo ad, California Evol Z:pl<a. CH[kl HILL at 714.4292000 Ext2249 ore-trail e pkoZch2mcom - Please RSVP.rp A;,,1 20 When? " z=I'hursdak May 9.2002 II St JOB Ulr Juah ,yiStF I e. . 30'a�to 330 pm� cb o6mcrt r r i ir', L •_ n i'e= Mii a<in9 Public Infrastrueture Assets to Minimize Costs and Maximize Performance. ° i u pp .pp �.:5 HMM HILL is pleased to invite you to"aftend a eomplirrientarywa stew dter, r . 1t conveyance eiorl�shop pvesenting strategies and approaches for ® egwating regulatory and planning activities and the tools that supper !ni ILI A" lnefagrotetl Approach to Collection Systems Project Planning pcommg-.. at. req new regulcut concerns seek out s plan - +m�rovernen� 4 1 Vill C11-121VIIHILL er 8 Keynote Speech Topics/ Speakers i RWQCB's Perspective: Ken Theisen Ken Theisen of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB)is the lead staff person for beach water quality issues. Ken has over 20 years experience with three different RWQCB regions- San Francisco Bay, San Diego, and Santa Ana. He is the author of the Waste Discharge Requirements for Sewage Collection Systems in Orange County,which implements elements of the federal CMOM requirements. Ken will discuss the development and Implementation of these waste discharge requirements and CMOM-type programs. EPA's Perspective: EPA representative invited 6 � moin Topics/Speakers Integrating Municipal Services and Environmental Goals and Processes: Reggie Rowe yyy! CMOM: Claudia Zahorcak ii Condition Assessment: Bob Woodhouse S System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan: Mike Agbodo l 6 Geographic Information Systems: Barb Schmitz Asset Management: Niidvelle Pla Capital Improvements Projects Prioritization/Financial Planning: Eric Rothstein For further details about the workshop, please contact: Mike Agbodo, CH2M HILL at 916.286.0208,or email:magbodo@ch2m.wm_ (See back side for reservation and location information) wlw ahouNl aeeend? •Collection systems operations and maintenance personnel, supervisors, engineers, planners, and managers •Officials involved in planning,financing,and constructing collection systems facilities tllhy should you attend? Wastewater management has become increasingly dynamic,competitive, and complex due to a variety of influences shaping our industry.Traditional approaches to project and servioe delivery are being challenged,and preservation of the status quo is untenable. In particular, utilities must continue to safeguard public health while engaged in stiff market competition.To effectively plan and guide ongoing transformation in a competitive marketplace, utilities must adopt a strategic business perspective; specifically, utilities can enhance their strategic position through decision-making techniques that characterize successful business organizations.This workshop is designed to provide you with an understanding of the application of a portfolio management approach to the development of strategic plans to meet today's increasing competitive monetary and performance pressures. Join experienced professionals from CH2M HILL as they present this comprehensive workshop that includes innovative ideas for approaches to all activities essential to the operation of wastewater conveyance systems and application M 1-1. uened to„ry m,mirindih• Condition Assessment and Geographic Information Capital Improvements Projects Rehabilitation Plan Systems (GIS) (CIP) Prioritization Condition assessment enables analysis GIS helps analyze complex wastewater CUP prioritization techniques provide a of the physical condition of existing collections systems problems. It serves sound basis for decision-making across sewers to identify rehabilitation needs as an integral part of projects, especially multiple competing projects,enabling that will increase capacity and reduce Ill. those requiring management of large utilities to select projects that will convey volumes of digital data,automation of the greatest benefit within constrained routine processes,integration of budgets. Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) engineering models, and the Regulations and GASB 34 development and application of custom Two recent initiatives will impact analytical tools. almost every municipal wastewater collection system: EPA:s draft SSO BN1e rule that incorporates CMOM, and GASB 34 that establishes new financial reporting requirements. Increasing competition demands that management and operations take d action to maximize effectiveness. oe...e. nra raw System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (SECAP) To demonstrate to EPA that SSOs that occur are unavoidable, a SECAP is Asset Management required.This plan includes evaluation Asset management supports better Financial Planning and capacity enhancement measures. management to lengthen the life of your CMOM will impose significant costs on The evaluation includes techniques to assets, reduce maintenance and repair wastewater utilities that will challenge identify capacities of essential system costs over the life-cycle of your facilities, utilities to manage associated rate components, hydraulic deficiencies, identify and quantify the critical repairs impacts. Financial planning reviews SSOs, and Ill sources.The capacity needed to sustain the successful options to spread costs over time and enhancement measures involve short- operation of your utility,and help your equitably distribute costs across utility and long-term actions, each including utility remain competitive. users. prioritization, alternative analysis,and a schedule. An Integrated Approach to collection Systems Project Planning aouewioyad azlwlxepy. pue s}sop aZIwlulW o}s}assv An 311 }sei}ul ollgnd 6ul6eueW,pallq uoi}eollgntl,}uawa6eueyy 'nu. dot{e]}si6a9ju1E 0£ lasso d3M pue VMMV/Neluawldwoo 'ud oc E;ol we,OE 6 e 9nia0aI IIIM JalsiBaJ of aranPl^IPui OE.su� - ZOOZ.'G Aeyy 'Aepvn.11 - ruarlM.. 9Z pdv Aq dASN oseuld WOO wZ9uC, �C1 a 11QW O to GtZZ '1x3000Z-6Zt-tU1e7..Ht\ZHO ?vdnZm(ian3... , :3303uo3 asnald ties 'uO1Ju,r35r6a� aa,r;snort aOy Mae II i 1 Ci12M DILL is pleased to invite you to attend a complimentary wastewater conveyance Workshop presenting strategies and approaches for integrating regulatory and planning activities and the tools that support them 6 • Commentary Sunday;March 10,2002 READER REBUTTALS/COLUMNS The Orange County Register ye th, READER REBUTTAL: WATER QUALITY th, co Tt Dropping district waiver isn't solution to As reported by the Orange Maddox has bought into - Maddox's proposal preempts the Legislature to weigh in on • County Register Assemblyman those claims and is proposing the appropriate regulatory au- an application for a waiver that At Ken Maddox, R-Garden Grove, legislation to prevent OCSD thorities from deciding on the may or may not be submitted, siF has weighed in on the ongoing from applying for acontin- merits a request for renewal of when other government bodies pri debate about the water treat- uance of its waiver.There is the waiver,before OCSD even have the ability to regulate ne ment waiver held by the however only one big problem decides if it wishes to submit whether a waiver application is on - - Orange County Sanitation Dis- with Maddioes reaction to an application.His proposal granted. - Ott trio["Legislafor seeks to bar those claims.None of the also does not consider the im- The only relevant and bene- hu CHRISTOPHER O.C.from seeking treatment claims are true. pact on local homeowners and ficial legislation that I believe ICE PRrvATT waiver,"Local News,Feb.141. First.all sewage is treated businesses from increased costs could be proposed on this mat- •' Mr.Prevatt who He,like some city leaden in prior to discharge into the resulting from secondarily ter would be to direct that,if a ph lives in Garden Orange County, secondary g percent Grove,is a a°6 ty, fallen vic-.. ocean.Second,Cuil second treating 100 rcent of the continuation of the waiver is ow member of the tim to the relentless campaign treatment only removes an ad- waste water.His proposal does not applied for or granted,that co Garden Grove of misinformation waged by ditional percentage of"solids" not consider that Currently,50 OCSD fund the additional th, Sanitary District the opponents of the dean wa- from the waste water.Second- percent of all sewage under- treatment costs from is re- to Advunry ter act waiver held by OCSD. ary treatment does not remove goes secondary treatment In serve fund.This would at least elf Commission, These individuals have all viruses and bacteria,only addition,his proposal does not prevent OCSD,which has by sp, claimed that the waiver allows complete water purification or address the problem of where many accounts excessive re- he, OCSD to dump untreated sew- chemical treatment would do to put the additional"solids" serves,from passing on the oc. age into the ocean.They have that In fad,OCSD is preparing generated from full secondary costs of implementing full sec- re: claimed that full secondary to add chlorine to the treated treatment.Processing facilities ondary treatment to local san- du treatment of sewage,which sewage to kill any remaining for this material do not exist in itation districts and ultimately of would be required if the waiver bacteria.Third,there is no con- .Orange County and increas- homeowners and businesse& sp, were to be dropped,would re- elusive evidence to support ingly other counties and states While I am in support of Tl move most of the bacteria and blaming beach closures on the are prohibiting disposing of cleaner water and cleaner ini viruses from the waste water waste water discarded in the this material in their jui isdio- beaches,I do not support tak- na discarded in the ocean 42 _ ocean by OCSD.In fact,mtmer- lions. ing actions and spending mil- Tl miles off the Coast of Hunting- ous studies have failed to lo- It is important for our lions of dollars on solutions be- pa ton Beach.They have claimed cafe the actual cause of the elected officials to not just sim- fore we know whether those oc. that the waste water flowing - high bacteria counts that have ply jump on some political solutions will solve the prob- sei into the ocean is the cause of resulted in beach closures.It is bandwagon during an election lem th, the beach closures in Hunting. , more likely that leaking sewer year.We have the right to ex- To stop the waiver,increase Cr. ton Beach and Newport Beach systems in coastal cities as welt pect that our elected off cials costs,and not solve the under- sta They claim that full secondary as pollution from rain water research the facts before they lying problem is poorly con- Lit treatment will solve the prob- runoff is the cause of the high propose legislation.I can find ceived public policy and simply tat lem of beach closures. levels of bacteria. - no current compelling need for stupid. ' wf 2002-03 COMMITTEE/BOARD CALENDAR JULY '02 AUGUST '02 SEPTEMBER '02 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 1 2 4 5 6 4 5 6 8 9 10 1 2 3 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 8 9 10 ;:7 12 13 14 14 15 16 18 19 20 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 25 26 27 29 30 31 22 23 24 26 27 28 28 29 30 31 29 30 OCTOBER '02 NOVEMBER '02 DECEMBER '02 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 M 3 4 5 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 7 8 9 1 2 3 5 6 7 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 20 21 22 24 25 26 17 18 19 21 22 23 15 16 17 19 20 21 27 28 29 30 31 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 JANUARY '03 FEBRUARY '03 MARCH '03 S M T W T F S S M J26 T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 1 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 6 7 8 2 3 4 6 7 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 13 14 15 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 23 24 25 16 17 20 21 22 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 27 28 23 1 24 25 27 28 29 30 1 31 APRIL '03 MAY '03 JUN IE '0:, S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 3 4 5 1 2 M171 6 7 8 8 10 11 12 4 5 6 8 9 6 7 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 16 16 13 14 20 21 22 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 2127 28 29 30 25 26 27 29 30 27 28 ■ Board Meetings(Aqua/Blue) 0 OMTS Meetings(Red) PDC Meetings(Yellow) FAHR Meetings(Purple) Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Effort h Marrh 27,2002 +mmendation ♦ Designate the use of bleach with sodium bisultite(dechlonnation as a mitigation measure)as the Preferred Alternative For further detailed evaluation ♦ Continue expeditiously to complete the work effort is ♦ Maintain continued compliance with Assembly Bill 411 (Recreational Bathing Water Standards)in surfzone ♦ Eliminate any possibility that release of treated wastewater is adversely affecting the surtzone 1 y Now? ♦ We can reduce bacteria and viruses released into the ocean ♦ We can meet beach water quality standards at our outfel,4.2 miles offshore in 200 feet of water ♦ We will remove all doubt that our discharge is a source of bacteria on the beach. If bacteria exceedances occur at the beach, it will not be OCSD Time Schedules ♦ Short-term (for interim period) ♦ Bleach with dechlormation is wall understood ♦ Use the existing facilities at Plant No.2 ♦ Install new facilities at Plant No.1 ♦ Improvements to existing facilities Time Schedules rw� ♦ Long-term(3 to 5-year) ♦ Evaluate wide-range of options ♦ We anticipate major improvements will be required ♦ Time to implement may be lengthy 2 c ri-Term Activities • Developed and reviewed alternatives • Bench-scale testing ♦ Environmental reviews ♦ Detail facility layouts ♦ Develop cost estimates vities/Resources ♦ Black 8 Veatch prepare detailed plans • Carollo Engineers conducting bench-tesfing and providing technical support ♦ Panel of engineers,plant operators,and industry expert to review proposed work • KPL Incorporated conducting environmental review ♦ OCSD staff and legal counsel uired Level ojEnvironmental iew ♦ 'Negative Declaration'—allowable when: • No significant impacts anticipated ♦ Midgaled by design and operation ppsnTle • Environmental Impact Report • Sigrdflcant impacts anticipated ♦ Cannot be mifigated by design and operation 3 ch-Scale Test Result ♦ Bleach followed by dechlodnation • Ultraviolet light ♦ Ozone(gas made from pure oxygen) ach Followed by chlorination • Feasible dose rate end contact time • Uses existing fecilides • Some facility improvements required • Low to no environmental impacts when employed with dechtodnation • Lowtonotoxcity, ♦ Method wall understood • less then nine months to implement aviOlet Light ♦ Feasible dose is and contact time • No loxiciy issues ♦ No anticipated!environmental impacts • Major facilities required ♦ Full scale pilot-test demonstration will be required ♦ Slow to Implement(2 to 3 years) 4 O>ne ♦•FFeasible dose rate only after secondary XUrrient ♦ Low to no toxicity issues ♦ No anticipated enviranmental impacts ♦ Major Pacilifies required ♦ Full scale pilot-test demonstration will Ise required ♦ Slaw to implement(2 to 3 years) ♦ Incomplete solution at Cost Estimates(S millions) present Alternative Capital Operating Value' Bleach with S 4 S7 558.1 O Gnnafien W Light S40 $4.2 $72.4 Oaonel $47 $3.5 $74 11V Light •loryee ate,5%Mean 5 ommended(Preferred) ernative ♦ Bleach followed by dechlonnation • Uses eristing facilities • Does not require major Plant modifiotions ♦ Low to no environmental impacts ♦ Feasible and amity to implement • Least cost alternative • May Its used as back-up to f rit a project edule to Implement Bleach lowed by Dechlorination ♦ Based on'Negative Declaration'Statement under CEIDA ♦ OCSD aaeN edopb In June 20V1 ♦ C bn minplero0/tatll%oPeradonel Oct 2002 MIq] ♦ Based on Environmental Impact Report(EIR) ♦ OCSD Bond adopts In Mamb=3 ♦ Sept. raon oomlaeb/fMditlea OpOraeanal Sept ZOgd at Do We Think? ♦ No anticipated impacts from proposed bleach followed by dechiorination ♦ Mitigated Negative Declaration • Adopt at June Board Meeting 6 9 -Term Disinfection Options ♦ Utilize Strategic Plan Update, look at: ♦ Chemical disinfection • Ozone ♦ Ultraviolet light ♦ Microfilaalion • Others? ♦ 3 to 5 year project schedule Will Do It Right! ♦ Compliance with California Ocean Plan residual chlorine limits ♦ Understand and control toxicity of disinfection byproducts ♦ Monitor impacts on marine life ♦ Possible changes to ocean monitoring program Lion ♦ Receive and file Engineering Report;and ♦ Receive and file Water Quality Report:and ♦ Designate the use of chemical bleach and sodium bisulfite(dechlorination as a mitigation measure)as the Preferred Alternative for further detailed evaluation 7 Orange County Sanitation District w .ocarl.eom 8 ACn Bd"S of Wastewater Treatment ♦ Treatment processes we use ♦What treatment accomplishes ♦ Proposed treatment processes ♦ Microfiltration of primary effluent ♦ Disinfection tewater Treatment Process SOURCECONTROL ♦ TREATMENT ♦ OUTFALL Boos to]M 9GN P�1 8 sroea •Depth e olstenee ie ocwo ♦DllutIon n.m.r. \tY j flit ration Porous,hollow fiber membrane l) water♦mnteminen% underpreesura Purified Water 1 Microfiltration of Primary Effluent ♦ Membrane with little hollow straws ♦ Three research projects ♦ California Energy Commission Grant for secondary equivalency ♦ 250,000 gallons per day pilot plant ♦ Wales, United IOngdom • 1 rigid ♦ Tyears Wastewater Treatment Process SOURCE CONTROL • TREATMENT • OUTFALL MI[ronlbNon taJ% Pdnu tad nIII-pp Ik e grdeylMGO) ol.mlxuun sla Mo ♦Oeplh .Olelar. ba%T✓ •ollunon <,D%9injection To clean something by removing or destroying harmful microorganisms ♦ Chemicals ♦ Filtration ♦ Radiation 2 Wastewater Treatment Process DISINFECTION SOURCE CONTROL + TREATMENT. OF OUTFALL Ch'..W./ MW fi - W% 1W 4 m 8eama. zap mdsy(rG�o) s�99v Depth •DIRen<e aocwn ♦DBnlon atment Removal Primary Semndary MIcro811re9on Suspended Solids 73% 93% 99% Orysnic Maeer(BOD) 43% 93% 75% Toslts(heary melels) 63% 88% 99% Bacteria 93,95% 98-99% 99.890•% Bacteria,numbers 18 Mlllon 2 rNlllon SUD Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Effort March 2],2002 3 4 'PJR' ommendation ♦ Designate the use of bleach with sodium bisulfte(dechlorinatlon as a mitigation measure)as the Preferred Alternative for further detailed evaluation ♦ Continue expeditiously to complete the work effort Is ♦ Maintain continued compliance with Assembly Bill 411 (Recreational Bathing Water Standards)in surfzone ♦ Eliminate any possibility that release of treated wastewater is adversely affecting the surfzone ,9;:,,, Y Now? ♦ We can reduce bacteria and viruses released into the ocean ♦ We can meet beach water quality standards at our outfall,4.2 miles offshore in 200 feet of water ♦ We will remove all doubt that our discharge is a source of bacteria on the beach. If bacteria exceedances occur at the beach, It will not be OCSD 4 40 Time Schedules ♦ Short-term(for interim period) ♦ Bleach with dechlonnation is well understood ♦ Use the existing facilities at Plant No.2 ♦ Install new facilities at Plant No. 1 ♦ Improvements to existing facilities Time Schedules ♦ Long-term(3 to 5-year) ♦ Evaluatewide-range of options ♦ We anticipate major improvements will be required ♦ Time to implement may be lengthy ` SR rt-Term Activities ♦ Developed and reviewed alternatives ♦ Bench-scale testing ♦ Environmental reviews ♦ Detail facility layouts ♦ Develop cost estimates 5 A�clivities/Resources ♦ Black&Veatch prepare detailed plans ♦ Carollo Engineers conducting bench-testing and providing technical support ♦ Panel of engineers,plant operators,and industry expert to review proposed work ♦ KPL Incorporated conducting environmental review ♦ OCSD staff and legal counsel uired Level of Environmental Few ♦ "Negative Declaration"—allowable when: • No significant impacts anticipated ♦ Mitigated by design and operation possible ♦ Environmental Impact Report • Significant Impacts anticipated ♦ Cannot be mitigated by design and operation a Bench-Scale Test Result V♦ Bleach followed by dechlorination ♦ Ultraviolet light ♦ Ozone(gas made from pure oxygen) 6 4Gach Followed by �i`✓r cchlorination ♦ Feasible dose rate and contact time ♦ Uses existing facilises • Some facility improvements required ♦ Low to no environmental impacts when employed with decidodnad on ♦ Low to no toxicity ♦ Method wall understood! • Less Man nine months to implement .e aviolet Light ♦ Feasible dose rate and contact time • No toxicity issues ♦ No anticipated environmental impacts • Major facilities required ♦ Full scale pilot-test demonstration will be required ♦ Slow to implement(2 to 3 years) fine ♦ Feasible tlose rate only after secondary treatment ♦ Low to no toxicity issues • No anticipated environmental impacts • Major facilities required ♦ Full scale pilot-test demonstration will be required • Slow to implement(2 to 3 years) ♦ Incomplete solution N.In 'al Cost Estimates(s millions) Present AltemaMe capital Operating Value' Bleach with Dachlodnatlon E 4 E 7 $58.7 W Light $40 $4.2 $72.4 Ozone $47 $3.5 $74 11V UBM 'IaWar Ne,a%Maratl S _ 1�T� A. sj Ikecommended(Preferred) N,V(ernative ♦ Bleach followed by dechlorination • Uses existing facilities • Does not require major plant modifications ♦ Low to no environmental impacts ♦ Feasible and timely to implement ♦ Leaal at alternative ♦ May be used as back-up to future project 8 edule to Implement Bleach lowed by Dechlorination ♦ Based on"Negative Declaration'Statement under CEOA ♦ OCSD Board scople In June 2002 ♦ ConstruMn completed l facility operational Op.2002 ♦ Based on Environmental Impact Report(EIR) ♦ OCSD Board adopts in March 2003 • ConaVud90nwmpietelfaclliaeeopemaonal Sept.2003 at Do We Think? ♦ No anticipated impacts from proposed bleach followed by dechlorination ♦ Mitigated Negative Declaration ♦ Adopt at June Board Meeting L'b g-Term Disinfection Options ♦ Utilize Strategic Plan Update, look at: ♦ Chemical disinfection ♦ Ozone ♦ Ultraviolet light ♦ Microfiltration ♦ Others? ♦ 3 to 5 year project schedule 9 Will Do It Right! ♦ Compliance with California Ocean Plan residual chlorine limits ♦ Understand and control toxicity of disinfection byproducts ♦ Monitor impacts on marine life ♦ Possible changes to ocean monitoring program r ption V♦ Receive and file Engineering Report;and ♦ Receive and file Water Quality Report;and ♦ Designate the use of chemical bleach and sodium bisulfite(dechlorination as a mitigation measure)as the Preferred Alternative for further detailed evaluation Orange County Sanitation District www.ocsd.com 10 f ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT March 20. 2002 as...: (7141962-2411 To the Chair and Members U.: of the Board of Directors (7141962M56 1N1e'"'OOed'°°m Subject: Board Letter m.11iny addrost: P.O, Box B12] Foan 92 vaoay.27 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 92]29-812] 9 y y 9 information on any of the items, please call me. euaec s Ays u: 1 urt Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley.G 9270B-7016 Plannina an Effective Coastal Plain Collaborative Strategy Member In late February, senior staff representatives from Orange County and the Sanitation Are"else District met to draft a proposed scoping process for developing a collaborative a strategy to address water quality in the northerly Orange County Coastal Plain. title. Attached is a discussion outline based on that meeting. Anshaim Brea The high points are as follows: Burns Park cypress Fcuntsln Vale, 1. Consultants working for the County will conduct interviews with ten to fifteen Fullarton key representatives of the affected agencies and interests in order to update Garden Grove Flansngt.h Brsth the discussion outline. Irvine 2. OCSD and OC will develop a list of information sources so that a "map" can Le Pol re be prepared for available information and information gaps. Le Patine P P 9 P Los Alamitos 3. Bob Ghirelli has arranged for Dionne Kardos of OCSD staff to assist in Newport saran developing graphics for use in the interviews,the scoping session (with Grano. Platens: revisions) and the final report(with further revisions). Sent.An 4. A proposed scoping session (30 - 50 people)will be convened. April 18 was Beal Beach suggested g9ested Taasn 5. The idea is to complete the Scoping Report by May 31. Perhaps there may Ville Perk be an interest on the part of EPA and the Regional Water Board in convening Ysrts Linda a "Town Hall" meeting on water quality in the OC Coastal Plain. This scoping c..aty of ores. report could provide the basis for such a meeting. 6. Finally, several key expert "peer" reviewers would review the work: Don sanitary Districts McIntyre, Larry Paul, Jerry King and Mary Jane Forster-Foley. costa Mase Midway city Water District. And What about Those Federal Grants We All Lona For?? Irvine Ranch The attached memo from our Washington liaison, ENS Resources, describes progress in the House and Senate for federal funding of the State Revolving Fund (SRF) program for wastewater and water infrastructure. Remember that the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA), through the Water Infrastructure Network, (better known as the bipartisan WIN team) has been To maintain world class leadership in weare eater and water resource management. Members of the Board Page 2 March 20, 2002 advocating for a multiple-year, multiple-billion dollar grant program for public infrastructure water and wastewater improvements. Our thinking has been that a new federal infusion of federal matching grants would motivate state and local governments to invest more into the Nation's aging infrastructure. Newport Beach Line Cleanings Update Recent articles have appeared in the Orange County Register on Newport Beach's disposal of sewer line cleanings in the Frank R. Bowerman landfill located in the City of Irvine. Newport Beach changed its practice so that the line cleanings are now hauled to OCSD for proper management. The District currently disposes line cleanings, grit and screenings and digester cleanings at Simi Valley Landfill. The Simi Valley Landfill is fully permitted to receive wastewater residual solid waste and biosolids;the Frank R. Bowerman landfill is not. The acceptance of these waste streams is based on a waste stream analytical profile that is maintained on file at the landfill and the District. These profiles are reviewed and renewed annually, with analytical information provided only when there is a significant change to the constituent concentration. Monitoring and acceptance criteria are defined in a landfill's Waste Discharge Requirements (W DR)that are issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Waste handling and acceptance procedures are in the W DR and the Facilities Permit issued by the Local Enforcement Agency(i.e., County Environmental Health/Integrated Waste Management Board). The District's disposal of these residuals at the Simi Valley Landfill is performed in complete compliance with all applicable regulations. OCSD does not charge Newport Beach or other District members for this waste disposal service because we would prefer to see the material removed from the sewer system at the source rather than flow through the District's trunk lines where it can create odors or damage pump stations. One More Story about September 11 Just when I thought every possible angle and story had been explored about the Twin Towers, I read the American Public Works Association's monthly journal, The Reporter. See the attached article for the challenges faced by the NYC Sanitation Department. Water: Our Next Planning Crisis? See the attached letter and white paper regarding new state laws regarding water supply issues and new development. Members of the Board Page 3 March 20, 2002 Well .... the good news is that the funding level could ultimately be$20 billion. The bad news is that it is mostly a loan program. Outright grants (in the form of"negative interest loans")would be available to a limited number of economically disadvantaged and mostly small communities. In other words,what is emerging is a loan program that, while helpful, falls short of the ideal of widespread infusion of new money into clean water grants. While the Sanitation District has a competent and realistic 20-year funding program planned for covering our$1.5 billion capital improvement program,the same can not be said for many of the local sewer systems here in Orange County. Our cooperative projects grant program will be helpful, but it will be insufficient without additional funds and matching funds coming from other sources. Sanitation District Staff Member Appointed to Fullerton Citizen's Infrastructure Advisory Committee Sr.Administrative Analyst Patrick McNally of the Collection Facilities O&M division was appointed to the Fullerton Citizen's Infrastructure Advisory Committee. The appointment will become official in April 2002. Mr. McNally also serves as the chairman of the Fullerton Energy and Resource Management Committee. The Infrastructure Advisory Committee will advise the city council on the development and implementation of an action plan to address the estimated $150.5 million in deficiencies to the citys infrastructure. The new committee will be responding to a recently completed action plan that set priorities and recommended a project schedule for this effort. OCWD's 2002 Festival Expedition On Wednesday, May 8 between 8 a.m. and 1 p.m., the Orange County Water District's Groundwater Guardian Team will present the 2002 Children's Water Education Festival—"From sea to shining sea . . . Protect and conserve our water." It is being held at Hidden Valley Park in Irvine. For more information on this largest event of its kind in the country, please call the Water District at 714 378-3362. SEHBNA Concerned about BOTH Air and Water Quality Issues at OCSD (from Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association Newsletter, Vol. 6, Issue 1) "As a result of allegations that the Orange County Sanitation District's outflow has been impacting our local ocean water quality. OCSD faces the prospect of losing a key EPA waiver that has allowed it to release less than fully treated water several miles out into the ocean. The waiver currently allows waste to be treated 100% Members of the Board Page 4 March 20, 2002 through primary and 50%through secondary processes. Many of Orange County's cities, including Huntington Beach, have issued resolutions calling for full secondary treatment before its release. Unfortunately, converting to full secondary treatment is not so simple. First, it would involve the build out of much of the remaining 50 acres of land at its Plant No. 2 facility across Brookhurst Street with additional odor-emitting operations-a grim prospect particularly for hundreds of SEHBNA's Blue and Purple Area residents who will breathe in and smell the additional emissions from new facilities. Secondly, the cost of going to full secondary treatment could be in the hundreds of millions of dollars and we recognize that those pushing for more treatment may not be able to write the kind of check to pay for proper local air quality mitigation, if any such technology even exists. SEHBNA obviously wants the best of both worlds--good air and ocean quality—and plans to fight for it. OCSD has formed a planning committee of citizens and political officials to give input for its upcoming decisions and SEHBNA is represented. Results of this committee are to be presented in March 2002. Seeking Control of FOG We're in the news regarding our role of controlling FOG. See attached. Hint: Our FOG has nothing to do with reduced visibility. Here Come Da Sludge We continue to utilize appropriate agriculturally-based methods for managing the 540 tons of biosolids we must dispose of each day. We now have a new ongoing relationship with the irrigated agriculture and dairy communities. This three-way relationship provides beneficial nutrients and income to the farmers, animal feed for the dairy community and a method for managing manure and biosolids. Odor Complaints I have attached a copy of the monthly odor complaints received by the Control Center. v e Members of the Board Page 5 March 20, 2002 Published Articles of Interest I've included copies of articles from various sources that you may find interesting. I would appreciate your feedback on receiving these articles, as there have become so many recently that it is difficult to determine which ones are most informative to you. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Aa� Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt G\W ROTANOMIMOIMFTTEFS TO THE BOAPP-0Zq&']M BOAPO LETTER OOL Attachments DRAFT DISCUSSION OUTLINE (Update: February 23,2002) NWOC COASTAL URBAN RUNOFF COLLABORATIVE STRATEGY SCOPING REPORT Prepared by: Lindell L. Marsh Siemon, Larsen & Marsh (facilitator for the Santa Ana River Watershed Group) Mark J.Wildermuth Wildermuth Environmental,Inc. I. INTRODUCTION This discussion outline has been prepared at the request of the County of Orange,to provide the basis for further facilitated discussions that, hopefully,will evolve into a collaborative strategy to address various concerns, issues and opportunities regard"urban run-off'within the coastal Orange County northerly of the 55 Freeway. A scoping session has been proposed for April 18,2002, from 8:30 to noon at the Beckman Center adjacent to UCI (tentative), with the objective of completing this Scoping Report by May 31, 2002 in close consultation with the affected constituency. II. CONCERNS, ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES The northwest Orange County coastal plain has been intensively developed over the past half century with a system of concrete flood control channels, sewer systems and impervious ground-cover that efficiently whisk storm and urban "nuisance" flows (street run-off and irrigation), together with waste water from 2.5 million [confirm] people to the ocean. Even the Santa Ana River bed was covered with concrete. And the Gospel Swamp and"Fountain Valley" and the high water tables upstream of Newport Bay have given way to residential communities with green lawns(and increasingly no lawn at all), sidewalks and parking lots. Our sense is that while the population has dramatically increased and continues to increase, the levels of a variety of commonly identified pollutants(e.g. heavy metals) within the remaining surface flows and in flood control channels and pipes have steadily decreased. However, the press of population, the increased sensitivity of our testing and our heightened health standards,have raised concerns regarding a variety of new water quality threats(e.g.,bacteria, endocrine disrupters,etc.). Over the last several years, C:%TEMPW WOC DRAFT DISCUSSION OUTLME.doc 4 beaches have been closed and concerns have been raised regarding the quality of regional water flows down the Santa Ana River. At the same time,there is a concern that the network of drains and channels and wildlife habitats provide niches("hot spots")for these threats to fester. In addition, out-dated local,leaking sewer systems are in significant need of repair(adding to the concern)and concerns have been raised regarding the water quality of our coastal beaches. In response, the Regional Water Board and EPA have responded with more robust and far-reaching regulatory programs for addressing non-point sources,city and county storm-water systems and,next,sewer systems. We have also begun to look back at the loss of our creeks and related wildlife habitat,as well as that of our coastal wetlands(e.g.,Bolas Chica and the Huntington and the Newport Beach wetlands)and the health of our near shore eco-systems. And we are looking forward to our increasing need to capture and take advantage of storm flows as a water supply asset and the value of our ground water basins. In sum,there is a growing sense that these concerns must be addressed systemically and collaboratively,with the help of the entire affected constituency of local, state and national agencies and organizations--a strategic collaboration. The County has begun to work in partnership with the Corps of Engineers on a number of watersheds in the area. Some cities have catalogued the needs of their out-dated sewer systems. Extensive research is underway on the part of OCSD and the City of Huntington Beach, and others, regarding the beach closure issues. Local, State and federal agencies have focused on Bolas Chica, The OCWD have been conducting a broad-scale monitoring of surface waters,with a view toward capturing and processing them as a part of our future water supply. The sense is that what we need now is to take these patches and while respecting the separateness of the individual pieces,we need to stitch them into a coherent and effective quilt of efforts—with funding and an orderly,sustained effort of improvement: we need a collaborative strategy. Specifically,the following is a beginning list of concerns, issues and opportunities(to be revised and expanded as the scoping proceeds). • Out-dated sewer systems and septic systems that to be repaired,replaced and improved. • Drain and flood control facilities which provide niches that harbor and promote bacteria and other pathogens("hot spots'). • Opportunities for the restoration/creation of wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities related to flood control and urban run-off systems. • Opportunities for the capture and processing of storm water for water supply purposes. CATEW\NWOC DRAFT DISCUSSION OU LiNE.dw • Beach/near shore water quality. • The restoration and enhancement of our near shore marine eco-systems. There are a variety of comments and questions that have been raised regarding these concerns and opportunities, including the following: • How do all of the agencies and organizations that need to be involved collaborate? What is the process? • What is the role of the Regional Water Board and EPA? Corps?Resources Agency? Department of Water Resources? Department of Fish and Game? Fish and Wildlife Service? • Who funds the process? • How do we develop a set of priorities, the strategy? • What are the concerns and"initiatives"that should pursued? There is no doubt that there are more than are listed above. Which agencies are involved with each? • How is the collaboration documented? Is it is plan, strategy,program or process? • The concerns and opportunities are of significant interest to the community (local, regional, State and national). It is critical that the approach to address them enjoys their broad and deep support. How are these communities involved in the process? • How much will it cost? Who funds the necessary works? III. SUGGESTED APPROACH The approach that we suggest is what the Santa Ana River Watershed Group (for which Marsh acts as the facilitator)refers to as"Shared Governance". It is the idea that the affected constituency of agencies and interests should work collaboratively and systemically to develop a strategy for addressing the identified concerns and opportunities. The process utilized is a facilitated"scoping process"in the spirit of the National Environmental Policy Act. Once the concerns and opportunities are identified, alternatives and related impacts with respect to each are explored by constituency of affected agencies and interests(normally one or more self-selected groups are convened), with a view toward the development of a collaborative strategy. The product is a Scoping C:\TEMP\NWOC DRAFT DISCUSSION OUTLINE.dac 4 Report that describes the emerging vision(s) and related initiatives. However,the Report does not present recommendations or advocate positions,it merely describes the resulting vision(s) and the related initiatives. The decisions to more ahead are left to the formal decision-makers,with the Scoping Report becoming a foundation for the required environmental and other documentation. A key element is the promulgation of specific`Initiatives". While the intent is to work systemically, at the same time,it is not to await the completion of some comprehensive plan. Rather,it is to scope"surgical","get-it-done progress"—initiatives, and move ahead as soon as they make sense. During the course of preparing this discussion outline, the attached `Preliminary List of Possible Participants"to be invited to participate has been developed and will be expanded. Others are welcome to participate as well on a self-selected basis. IV. NEXT STEPS The next step is to conduct a series of interviews with key representatives of affected agencies and interests and then to convene the Scoping Session scheduled for April 18 at the Beckman Center. Wildermuth Engineering will work with OC and OCSD to compile a list of sources of information need to compile a"map"of available information and information needs. OCSD will assist in the development of a graphic that can be utilized in connection with this work(the interviews,the scoping session and the final report). This discussion outline will be further fleshed out in connection with these interviews for use at the meeting and then revised with the affected constituency to provide the base for the final Scoping Report to be completed by May 31. There has been some discussion with EPA regarding the convening of a`town hall"session regarding the Orange County Coastal Plain. Perhaps the final Scoping Report will provide a basis for this session and further action. C:\TEN2\NWOC DRAFT DISCUSSION OUTLINE.doc i PRELIMINARY LIST OF POSSIBLE PARTICIPANTS (Update: February 23,2002) 1. County of Orange(Watersheds,Public Facilities and Flood Control,Department of Health). 2. County of Los Angeles. 3. Cities: Seal Beach,Huntington Beach,Newport Beach,Anaheim,Fountain Valley, Santa Ana,Brea,Placentia,Yorba Linda, La Habra, and others. 4. Orange Coast Keeper 5. Natural Resources Defense Council 6. Environmental Defense Fund 7. SCCWRP 8. UCI 9. Cal TRANS 10. California Department of Fish and Game 11. Department of Water Resources 12. United States Fish and Wildlife Service 13.United States Army Corps of Engineers 14. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region 15. EPA 16. 00SD 17. 00WD 18. Coastal Coalition 19. California Coastal Commission 20. California Coastal Conservancy C:\TEKPXNWOC DRAFT DISCUSSION OUTLINE.doc r MEMORANDUM TO Federal Legislative and Liaison Committee FROM: Dave Williams DATE: March 15,2002 SUBJECT: SRF Funding Legislation Update The past several weeks have witnessed increased legislative activity surrounding SRF reauthorization. Specifically,both the House and Senate committees withjurisdiction over clean water SRF policy have conducted hearings on legislative proposals and are preparing to proceeds to markup of their respective bills. The following summarizes the status of major legislation in these areas. Wafer Infrastructure Funding Legislation Moving in House and Senate Efforts to respond to the documented funding shortfall in the nation's clean water and drinking water infrastructure program has led to House and Senate committee consideration of legislation to renew the State Revolving Loan Fund program. The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,Subcommittee on Water Resources conducted hearings into the Water Quality Financing Act(H.R. 3930)earlier this week. This bill,which is sponsored by the Chairman,Jimmy Duncan(R-TN)and Ranking Democrat Peter Defazio(D-OR), includes a number of provisions contained in the Clean Water htfiastructure and Security Improvement Act(H.R. 3792)that CASA had earlier endorsed,including flexibility of the SRF program's use and expanded efigibilities to fund water quality programs and security needs. H.R.3930 would fund the clean water SRF program over five years at$20 billion. The bill is notable for the lack of prescriptive provisions related to securing an SRF loan. The Senate counterpart,S. 1961,includes a number of new mandates as a condition to receiving a loan as previously reported. The bill would establish additional subsidies,including loan forgiveness for disadvantaged communities. H.R.3930 retains the CASA priority of maintaining the SRF program. Instead of authorizing a direct grants program for the amount appropriated above$1.4 billion,the bill provides for negative interest subsidies that would translate into an effective grant. The bill would also provide for a new policy by directing potential SRF recipients to consider public- private partnerships and other cost saving concepts as a means to reduce the funding gap. During the hearing into the bill,the provision was strongly endorsed by most of the members who were present as well as by EPA. Unlike the Senate version,municipalities would only be •Page 1 C:nEMRXfti5 updaWbc encouraged to consider partnerships. It would not be a precondition to obtain a loan. The bill would also require communities to conduct asset management and ensure that rates were established to protect the federal investment H.R 3930 also seeks to establish supplemental project spending by authorizing the use of tax exempt securities to construct POTWs. This provision must be reviewed and approved by the Ways and Means Committee. Prospects of its final passage are unclear. Within the committee,strong support for the SRF program reauthorization and H.R 3930's provisions exists. The administration opposes the finding provisions but its position is not viewed as a threat to moving the bill to the floor. This support however could breakdown when debate begins over the application of Davis Bacon(requiring union-scale wages for construction work) flit has delayed action on otherpublic works type legislation in the past. Senate BdI iW ed in Disputes Over SRFMandwes In the Senate,the Committee on Environment and Public Works is preparing to proceed to markup of its SRF funding bill,the Water Investment Act(S. 1961). The legislation is similar to the House bill in many respects,providing$20 billion to support clean water needs,but also $15 billion for drinking water needs because the committee has jurisdiction over both issues unlike the House committee. S. 1961 enjoys bi-partisan support,but its passage is likely to be complicated by a number of provisions most notably the application of Davis Bacon to SRF financed projects regardless of whether the funds are the result of a direct federal grant or from proceeds that are derived from a loan repayment. Committee members have indicated that this issue is highly divisive. Other contentious provisions including authorizing SRF assistance to private entities to construct wastewater facilities,a new allocation formula favoring sparsely populated states,and requirements such as asset management as a condition to receiving a loan are expected to create additional hurdles for the bill as communities question the need for additional red tape. Outlook Both the House and Senate committees have made passage of their bills a top priority. As of this writing,the House is expected to proceed to markup of HR 3930 the week of March 18. It is clear from the House subcommittee hearing that the administration's opposition to the finding provisions will not be an obstacle to committee consideration. Instead,the likely obstacles to committee passage are expected to be Davis Bacon mandates and an effort to redesign the allocation formula that determines how much finding each state would receive. For California,this debate is expected to be important as smaller states are expected to seek a formula that would decrease states like California's share. The Senate may attempt to markup S. 1961 in late March,but this could slip as the contentious issues like the allocation formula,Davis Bacon,and mandates to perform asset management require additional time to develop compromises within the committee. Even with these obstacles,it now appears that an SRF reauthorization bill has a high probability of being reported to both the House and Senate for debate and a vote on passage later this summer at the earliest. 9 Page 2 AM—ERIICCAN�PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION • MARCH 2O02 • www.apwa.net f�L.rL REPORTER.. i!t � :y• - •j { Y mobw r i I J1, A salute to the New York City Sanitation Department George Crombie Director of Public Works City of Nashua,New Hampshire Member APWA Solid Waste Management Committee On Dmmber 18,2001,1 traveled from Boston to New York City How did you approach the thought of having to dispose of to interview Pete Montalbano,First Deputy Commissioner, thousands of tons of debris? New York City Department of Sanitation, to discuss the heroic efforts of the New York sanitation workers In cleaning up the The likely candidate was the Fresh Kills landfill.Although the facility City after the horrific events of September 11. had been closed,the operating permit was good through December 31,2001.Under the leadership of New York State Governor George The New York City Sanitation Department was then headed up by Pataki,and then-New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani,the Fresh Commissioner Kevin P. Farrell and is one of the largest sanitation Kills Landfill in Staten Island was reopened solely to accept the departments In the world.Over a II&war history,the department wreckage from the World Trade Center.During the coming year it and Its 10,000 employees have provided street cleaning and disposal is estimated that over 1.5 million tons of construction debris will for 7.5 million Inhabitants, disposing of 13,000 tons of refuse on be disposed at this site. The guidance of Marty Bellew, Director, a daily basis.Despite this long history,the events of September 11 Bureau of Waste Disposal and Mike Mucci, Director of the Fresh and days following would forever fortify the harrowing efforts of KIIIs landfill, would prove invaluable to the many government the NY Sanitation Department. agencies,contractors,and law enforcement personnel Involved in the disposal operations. The following are excerpts of my conversation with First Deputy Commissioner Montalbano describing the events surrounding How did you approach the task of moving over a million tons September 11. of debris out of Manhattan in that the Fresh Kills Landfill was separated by water? What do you remember about September 117 After consideration we decided the best way to remove materials 1 was sitting In my office lust a few blocks away from the World was to set up transfer locations as dose to Ground Zero as possible. Trade Center when l heard an explosion. My first thoughts were We were fortunate to haw two marine transfer stations that had been that construction workers down the street had broken a gas fine. previously dosed located at 59th Stem on Manhattan's west side and Within minutes staff began to peer out the windows and saw the a site In Brooklyn adjacent to the Brooklyn Batterynnnel.These two smokebillowing from one of the World Trade Center towers.Beyond facilities were reopened and up and functioning within twenty-four conceivable thought a second plane hit the second tower,and within hours.These transfer stations not only provided a location for the New what seemed the speed of light,the twin towers one by one collapsed York City Sanitation Department to dump,but were used by the four taking out our phones and radio system.With the second collapse,the major contractors Tilly,AMEC,Tumer,and Bovis who had divided area became surreal.For countless blocks,the dust and debris settled the Worldhade Center into four quadrants to begin the painstaking on streets and buildings like a new fallen gray snow. task of removing these massive structures. What were some of the key decisions made after I those shocking first hours? We knew we were going to have to play a major role in the cleanup, but didn't know the timing due to all the uncertainty.Our planning efforts began at once.We needed to relocate our offices to a central command where we could coordinate staff and equipment.The location we chose was the Motor Equipment Repair Facility on SBth Street in Queens.The 58th Street Motor Equipment Facility allowed for an area to plan operations and to move equipment and Sanitation Workers to Ground Zero in Rom around the City.Three major areas that we knew we would be Involved In were street cleaning, collection,and disposal. - 24 APWA Reporter March 2002 There is no manual or guide that will take the place of swell-seasoned aP° management team in the field E. Before the cleanup is complete, more than 15 million tons of materials will have been processed,landfilied and recycled Haw did you clean all the dust and debris from the streets? 3. Disaster situations involve tremendous amount of continuous coordination with other agencies. Decisions need to be made We decided that we were going to meet two goals.The first was that quickly.Therefore,an agency such as the Office of Emergency we were going to clean up the area surrounding Ground Zero In Management(OEM)is needed to coordinate the operations of lower Manhattan just as fast as humanly possible and maintain our all agencies at the scene. You need to make sure that the regular cleaning and collection schedules In the rest of the City.1 Individuals who represent you at OEM are"street smart,'know am proud to report that we did both.The cleanup of the thousands your operations,and can make decisions. of tons of debris on the streets was a daunting task.We divided the area from the Hudson River to the East River from Canal Sheet to s. Communities realty need he know how state and federal monies the Battery Into twenty-seven sectors.Over 800 sanitation workers, are allocated to a city or town.Each community should have at chlefs,supervisors,and superintendents from across the City were least one expert who understands how the system works to brought In to work in teams covering each sector working rotating facilitate your area's cleanup efforts. twelve-hour shifts. Major equipment used included short-hoses, flushing trucks,street sweepers,fuel across,refuse trucks and open S. Know a lot about bath private and public resources In your region body dump trucks and front-end loaders.Trucks with sand spreaders and how to go about securing them In a time of crisis. There were used as barricades around the cleanup blacks.Block by block, should be a streamlined procurement process in place. New York City sanitation workers wearing protective clothing,i.e., face masks,eye protection,and gloves,and facing the risk of further 6. Have access to a portable fuel system such as gas trucks that can building collapses,began hosing down the buildings,loading debris, service equipment on the go. sweeping and flushing the streets,and bringing the City back to life. Obstacles faced during the cleanup effort Included working with 7. There Is no manual of guide that will take the place of a well. utility companies restoring communication,air monitoring,and the seasoned management team and staff who have an Impeccable never<nding danger of another building collapse. understanding of their operations. What type of advice would you like to share with public 8. We have entered Into a new age where we need to be diligent, works officials who may be faced with such a catastrophic have a clear understanding of our surroundings, and have event in the future? disaster plans in place. 1. Haw a backup communication system in place.in a catastrophic Conclusion event, phone communication and radio stations may go out. To date,over 700,000 tons,nearly half of the estimated materials, Think about possible satellite communication. have been removed from Ground Zero and the blocks surrounding the site. It won't be until late this year that the cleanup effort is 2. A secure and viable landfill site is a must.You ate going to need an complete.I wasn't sure how I would react when I arrived In New York. area to take the debris for examination and evidence retrieval. Before leaving New York City 1 toured Ground Zero and the adjacent blocks.To say the least,my experience left me with great pride In Continued on page 26 March 2002 APWA Reporter 25 ADVERTISER , INDEX Advanced Fleet Nolte Associates,Inc.,pA2 Management Solutions,p.43 w+:+:.NOLTE.com ^.ry Cdvaocedf!eec.ccm Orth-Rodgen&Associates, n Aerial Data Service,Inc.,P.42 Inc,p.211 t w+v.%.d'na'we SJ'n '%,crt'Pcdge6.COT Alvord,Burdick&Howson, Public Administration UX..P.43 Service,pA3 wvvu abheooinrers.con, postmaster®pashq.o:g_ Asphalt Pavement Alliance, Q-CAD,pA3 PAS q'aocom vv:a:asphahal'lance.ccre New York City Sanitation Department street sweepers played Sprayer Specialties,Inc,p.t9 a major role in picking up tons of debris Associated Engineers,Inc, oarv+sprayers.com pA3 - en••v.:assxen_.ccm Stearns 8 Whelex p.43 w:aysaeamrv:he'eccom_";,' Boyle Engineering Cantmurd/^un page 25 Corporation,p.42 Stomlwater Magazine° ' -%-Nmboyleenglneeroq enm/`e11Ste1'neV'S11h being an American.The New York City Sanitation Department and Bums IS McDonnell. F.42 Surface Systems,Inc( its employees have done a remarkable job in bringing new life into burnsmcd.mm pA2 the City.The streets and sidewalks were spotless and you could hear and see the flushing trucks and sweepers at work.The streets were Carollo Engineers;p.42 filled with police officers,firefighter,utility workers,public works vw,v,amllamm. 3M Traffic Control Divl` p B employees,and children with teachers explaining the significance of C Concrete Reinforcing Steel :.r.^m.3tn::om'em:' September 11 each in their own special way. Institute.P.4 vnvw.crsi.org Tighe&Bond,pA2' There have been thousands of letters sent from children across Me r;n•+.ogh�ond Dannenbaum Engineering country who have rallied around New York City.My favorites were: Corporation,p.43 Traffic Safety Devices,^ "When the rain stops,the sun romes out^;"American ends with I vr:rv+.daon=nbaumsra pA3 Can";"Dear Worken,be careful.Thank you for saving people and .....:roadgc;rebu-ieee cleaning.I saw the plane crash in the World Trade Center.You are Forest Hills Garden ProtluR;, " doing a at job and are safe.Sincere) Ga Inc.,pA3 Universal Field Services 8 great 1 y, ry";and"It Is our gear ugmBn.<cm p.42 pleasure to send these 356 pairs of work gloves.The students of Pine ...n^.:alssccem'-; View School,Sarasota,Florida wish to express their sincere thanks and Gannett Fleming,p.42 co- Vall Cooper a+:.. appreciation to you and your department for your courage and hard qe'.-:; Cmmg '� Inc.,p.42 - work,signed,A fellow American,Holly Waggoner." - Greeley and Hansen,pA2 +valKOopeccom,. vnrm,;aeley-harisu.w-. The New York City Sanitation Department b awondedul organization. Washington infra Hess Engineering Inc.,pA3 Services,pA3 Not only did they do aremarkable job indeaningup the City under .w.^m.HessEng.wm, o„v g�ntcom ' tremendous adversity,their employees donated money to the vfcrims v. - of September l l and they collected hundreds of Christmas presents p42 E.+stcacom Hubbell, Roth&Clark,Inc, Weston,p.42 to give to needy children. ...av ....r.:hrcencr.-cm Willdan Associates,Ii The American Public Works Association and all of Its members Manhole Adjustable Riser wvv,..Am oom from across North America salute the New York City Sanitation Co.,o_p.6 m a sersor., Woo pert ll.P,p.43 Department for setting the standard in making us proud of our s'� ev.;•:.+voa:yrtmm, profession. Martin&Martin,p.42 vum ne^.;r..r^;T^co-irp.Ye.c Special thanks go to Kathy Dawkins,Director of Public Information, MJ.Harden Azsociales,mq New York City Sanitation Department and John Pampolone, slstant pA3 Director of Public Information,who authored the photos. •` Cc— To reach George Crumble, call(603)589-3140 or send a-mail To CmmbieGPNashuaNH.org. Q 26 APWA Reporter March 2002 rnanatt Manatt, Phelps a Phillips,LLP Main Number: (714)371-2500 mane I Phelps I Phillips Facsimile: (714)371-2550 February 15,2002 Robert Ghirelli Director of Technical Services Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley California 92708-7018 Re: Water:Our Next Crisis? Dear Roppp[.v Please find enclosed our follow-up to the recent (range County ULI presentation regarding water supply issues. Hopefully, this additional information will help you better understand the scope and interrelationship of SB 610 and SE 221 and how this new legislation will impact the land development process. In the near future our law firm will be presenting more detailed seminars on this and other related issues. If you would like to be on our mailing list for such presentations please contact William Devine (wdevineldmanatt.com) or Christine Diemer Iger (ciger6a4manatt.conl). In the meantime,should you have any questions or need help in these or other entitlement related matters please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Christine Diemer Iger William R. Devine Partner Partner Enclosure 650 Town Center Drive,Suite 1250,Costa Mesa,California 92626 Telephone: 714.371.2500 Fax: 714.3712550 Los Angeles I Mexico City I Monterrey I Orange County I Palo Alto I Sacramento I Washington,D.C. 700ON14.1 fir, LEmk_ m a natt Mn Phelps Phillips,LLP Main Number. (714)371-2500500 manalt I phelps I phlllips Facsimile:(714)371.2550 February 15, 2002 UPDATE WATER SUPPLY AND LAND USE PLANNING To: Manatt, Phelps & Phillips Clients and Interested Parties Re: Manatt, Phelps & Phillips Overview of the Scope and Implications of SB 221 and SB 610 as They Relate to Land Development in California. 1. What concerns lead to the adoption of these new laws? • Water supplies available for Southern California are diminishing because of in- stream flow requirements related to preservation of biological resources, lack of state or federal funding for large storage projects and environmental opposition to the same, heightened water quality standards within the San Francisco/ San Joaquin Bay Delta, and increased utilization of Indian reserved water rights by Indian tribes along the Colorado River. • Previous water supply legislation adopted in 1995 (SB 901) did not fully address the concerns regarding assurance of adequate water supplies for projects. • In a recent study it was concluded that only 2% of 119 large-scale projects subject to SB 901 had EIR's with adequate water supply assessments while another 136 development projects that met the SB 901 size threshold were not subject to water supply assessments, either because an EIR was not prepared, or because a general plan amendment or specific plan was not required. 2. What are the new requirements under SB 610 and SB 221 and when do they go into effect? • The requirements under both bills went into effect January 1, 2002. • Must prepare a Water Supply Assessment ("WSA") even if a project is only subject to a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration (SB 610). • Must prepare a WSA even if the entitlements applied for do not include a general plan amendment a specific plan (SB 610). • More rigorous requirements for Urban Water Management Plans ("UWMP") and WSA's (SB 610). • WSA can no longer rely on "paper" water rights but must demonstrate that water can actually be delivered to the project site (SB 610). 11355 W.Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles,California 90064 Telephone: 310.312.4000 Fax: 310.312.4224 Los Angeles I Mexico City I Monterrey I Orange County I Palo Ago I Sacramento I Washington,D.C. manatt manatt I phelps l pannps • Public entity preparing the WSA, under BB 610, or the Water Supply Verification ("WSV"), under SB 221, now has 90 days rather than 30 to complete the process and, if not completed, the city, county or, under BB 221, the applicant, can pursue a writ of mandate (SB 610 and SB 221). • Under SB 221, prior to issuance of a tentative map for a covered project, the city or county must either (1) receive a written WSV, from the Public Water System ("PWS") supplying the project, that there is a sufficient water supply to meet the needs of the project over the next 20 years, in addition to existing and planned future uses (SE 221) or (2) find that that, despite the lack of an adequate WSV, there is or will be adequate water for the project. • The Tentative map for such a subdivision shall include a requirement that a sufficient water supply be available prior to development (SB 221). 3. What projects are governed by SB 610? BB 221? • SB 610 governs all projects subject to CEQA that exceed the following sizes: (1) Residential development of more than 500 dwelling units. (2) Shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet. (3) Commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet. (4) Hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms. (5) Industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet. (6) Mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above. (7) Any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project. (8) Any project that accounts for an increase of 10% or more in the number of existing service connections for a PWS. • Under SB 221, a project is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units or one that accounts for an increase of 10% or more in the number of existing service connections for a PWS. Applies to Development Agreements that include such subdivisions. 4. What are the responsibilities of the city or county under this legislation? • Determine if a project is subject to the new requirements. • Request the appropriate PWS to prepare a WSA or provide a water supply verification. -2- manatt manatt I phelps I phillips • Prepare a WSA or provide a water supply verification if there is no appropriate PWS or the PWS fails to prepare the necessary document. • File a writ of mandate forcing the PWS to prepare the required assessment or verification if the PWS does not do so within the required time period. • Determine whether projected water supplies will be sufficient to satisfy the demands of the project, in addition to existing and planned future uses. 5. If a PWS determines that there is not sufficient water supply, can the city or county still approve the project? • Under SB 610, the answer is clearly yes. The only requirement is that if the city or county determines that water supplies will not be sufficient, they must include that determination in their findings for the project. • Under SB 221, the answer is a qualified yes. The city or county can make its awn finding of adequate water supplies. The tentative map must include a condition requiring that a sufficient water supply be available prior to development. 6. What happens if a PWS fails to prepare a WSA or provide a certification within the required 90-day time period? • Under SB 610, the city or county may file a writ of mandate against the PWS forcing preparation of the assessment. • Under SB 221, either the city or county or other interested party may file a writ of mandate forcing issuance of the certification. 7. How do SB 610 and SB 221 work together? • SB 610 is much more general and covers a much broader range of projects. • SB 610 requires preparation of detailed WSA's for each of the covered projects, which are then incorporated into the appropriate environmental document. • SB 221 only applies to the issuance of a tentative map for residential projects of 500 or more units (with the exception noted above) and requires written verification from a PWS of adequate water supplies. • SB 221 exempts from its certification requirement in-fill projects and projects exclusively for very low and low-income households, while SB 610 provides no such exemption from its WSA requirements. 8. What are the implications or likely impacts of the new legislation on the land entitlement process? • Many more projects will now be subject to the WSA process. • The content of a WSA will be much more detailed and, therefore, more costly and time-consuming to prepare. -3- Manatt maned I Phelps I phlllos • UWMP's will become much more significant in the land use planning process. All potentially impacted parties should be involved in their preparation. • The time necessary to prepare WSA's may create conflicts with the permit streamlining act. • Lead agencies may begin to apply the WSA procedures to smaller projects in order to address water supply impact issues under CEQA. • Could be significant litigation relating to timeliness of preparation, adequacy of assessments, and which projects are covered. • Likelihood of further delays and greater costs in obtaining entitlements. • Likelihood that many PWS's and cities and counties may see this legislation as an opportunity to transfer the cost of new water supply development from water agencies to developers. 9. What are we likely to see in the future regarding the water and land use connection? • As part of the compromise process for SB 221, Senator Kuehl's office and other stakeholders agreed that further legislation linking land use and water supplies will not be pursued for at least 5 years. • Despite this promise, the connection between land use and water supplies will --- , continue to become more intertwined as water supplies from Northern California and the Colorado River become more limited. N�A.f2 Involvement in the bigger picture of water supply, water quality and water ��- resources management within the state and the region Is imperative for those gEctd,, .pp„ relying on water for future development. • in an effort to address the uncertainties created by the new legislation, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California issued a "Report on Metropolitan's Water Supplies", dated February 11, 2002, which suggests adequate water supplies within it's service area for the neat 20 years. This findings of this report have been challenged by some environmental organizations and will probably be the subject of debate for sometime. Manatt Attorney Contacts: William R. Devine Christine Diemer Iger 714.371.2526 714.371.2510 wdeviue@manatt.com ciger@manatt.com PLEASE NOT@ This update summuBes recent legal developments and articles Oom other publications. It h;not meant to express any legal opinion or advice. you Should consult an attorney for legal advice. COPYRIGHT 2002 by Manatt,Phelps h Phillips,LLP.A0 rights reserved. Manatt,Phelps h Phillips,LLP, 12'•Floor,Center Tower,650 Town Center Drive;Costa Mesa,CA 92626;Phone:714.371.2500;Fax: 714.371.2550;website:w .manatt.cem -4- O.C. agency to channel sewer interests Page 1 of 3 B R 0 W N AN o '- CALDWELL B Jtf lff `"` rt Want to subscribe Water Resources i agency to channel sewer interests SoCal Water Resources g y News? We cover it all, every day: Water,waste- But with state deadline for action on grease-induced water,flood control, and spills pressing, it promises to be a tough job. coastal water quality. It's free'. March 3, 2002 Visit our subscription site By TERI SFORZA The Orange County Register at: www.bcwatemews.com/ It has been nearly a year since a grand jury scolded Orange County officials for doing virtually nothing to control the grease problem that chokes sewer pipes and leads to chronic sewage spills that foul the See also the latest on: beaches and ocean. • Asset management Officials vowed to draft a comprehensive countywide ordinance and get something done, but disagreements over who should be • Infrastructure responsible for what have ensued,and little has been accomplished. fundin A state deadline looms. By 2004, all agencies must control sewer • CMOM overflows and have concrete plans in place for doing so.To that end, the Orange County Sanitation District is stepping into the fray to organize and lead the charge, even though the mission promises to be a lot like herding rats. "Our goal is to find a way to control the fats, oil and grease in our sewers in a practical, equitable and enforceable manner," said Brown and Caldwell Adriane Renescu,engineering supervisor with the sanitation district. 16705von Karmen, Sufis zoo "We're getting involved to prepare the building blocks. Irvine.CA 92606 (949)2 6152 phone (949)474A94o fax "It's a very complicated issue and requires a lot of resources because of the number of restaurants we have(6,800)and because of the enforcement issue. Enforcement is expensive. But there's no use having an ordinance if there's no enforcement" So the sanitation district is assembling a regional committee o FOG --fats, oil and grease—that will meet for the first time in March. Grease is not much of a problem for the district; its main mission is treating sewage, not collecting it, so most of the lines it owns are so yawningly wide that grease can't clog them up. But grease-- primarily from restaurants and high-density housing —is a terrible problem for the cities and districts that run the narrow collection pipes that feed into the sanitation district's treatment plants.About 90 percent of sewage spills from those lines are caused by grease buildup, the grand jury said. Part of the FOG committee's charge will be to determine which "miracle solutions,"if any,actually destroy grease. Many restaurants have rejected expensive grease traps and turned to these"miracle file://C:\TEMP\O.C.%20agency%20to%20channel%20sewere/n20interests.htm 03/07/2002 O.C. agency to channel sewer interests Page 2 of 3 solution"chemicals, but such chemicals might interfere with the delicate biological sewage-treatment process. The challenge now, as before when the sanitation district tried to prod other agencies on the grease issue, is that it has no real authority over cities and sewer districts and can't require them to act. "The head of Homeland Security's job isn't going to be any harder than trying to get 36 different cities and sanitation districts here to - cooperate,"said Gary Parkinson, president of the Orange County Chapter of the California Restaurant Association and owner of the Summit House Restaurant in Fullerton."I'm just happy it's not me." Parkinson and the county's restaurant Industry were among the first to resist the grand jury's suggestions. Expensive grease traps and interceptors are not a magical answer to the problem,they argued; they're smelly, unsanitary and fail to prevent all grease from entering sewer pipes. Restaurants—a$227 million industry here—prefer a"best management practices"approach,adopted by the City of Los Angeles last year,that includes wiping pots and pans down with paper towels before washing them. But restaurants weren't the only ones to object. A countywide grease law and strict enforcement are great ideas, most cities and sewer districts said,but the county's restaurant inspectors should do the enforcement work, not them. Inspectors visit restaurants three to four times a year,anyway,so it makes sense to put them in charge,they said. Those running the countys,restaurant inspection programs balked. They are sanitary inspectors, not plumbing inspectors, program managers said. Then there was talk of inspectors simply checking restaurant paperwork to be sure grease traps are serviced regularly.The county Board of Supervisors asked its staff to draft a grease ordinance in September, but it's not yet complete, said Bill Mahoney,assistant chief executive. Meanwhile, children in Northern California are decorating coffee cans with grinning fish, showing their parents the artwork and sharing the war cry they learn at school:"Grease! Put a lid on itl" "Seals, sea lions, sea otters,whales-they're trusting us to take care of them and take care of the place they live,"Pack Grove Mayor Sandy Koffman told children recently."Tell Mom and Dad,Tefs not pour grease down the drain anymore:" In Pacific Grove—as in Orange County—cooking grease from restaurants and high-density residential areas is choking aging sewer pipes,spewing raw sewage into streets and waterways and fouling the ocean. Might Orange County children be decorating coffee cans with grinning fish soon? file://C:NTEMP%O.C.%20agmcy%20to%20chamel%2Osewer%20interests.htm 03/07/2002 O.C. agency to channel sewer interests Page 3 of 3 "My good plan has to have a large educational element;said Lisa Murphy,sanitation district spokeswoman. NOTICE:In eaaNenee wtih TAla 1r U.S.C..ii c 107.soot mci.ft is vv idw wifl o pellnifelan ham"copyrelt owner.My fa pursues of wtitivn,Moslem,ar mhlp eM reNach ui a IM T uw'awiebns of fedad copyright laws.TI mala My .1 M Olahihuletl kW .m. Wkr Yeir use.'w t paMsslan d the copyrightowner. filc://C:\TEMP\O.C%20agency°/*20to0/o20charmcl%2Osewer%2Ointerests.htm 03/07/2002 Tappan, Jean From: Murphy, Lisa Sent: Monday, March 11,2002 9:45 AM To: EMT Subject: LA Times Article From Today's paper. THE REGION Orange County Finds Distant Taker for Sludge Environment: Human waste product is a tough sell for sanitation district that doesn't treat it to the level required by state's agricultural counties. By SEEMA MEHTA TIMES STAFF WRITER March 112002 Running out of places willing to take the sludge left over from sewage treatment,the Orange County Sanitation District is trucking it to an Indian tribe's farmland 270 miles away. Dale Wakimoto, farm manager for the Fort Mojave tribe, said the reservation will save$100 an acre on commercial fertilizer by using the sludge on its vast acreage in eastern San Bernardino County. The tribe will be paid about$6,000 a month for accepting the sludge. Sludge is the solid matter left over after the sanitation district treats sewage, extracting and cleansing the water. Farmers say the sludge is valuable fertilizer.But concerned about the smell and dust given off by the human waste, agricultural counties throughout the state are banning its use unless it is treated to a higher level to kill disease-causing bacteria and other microorganisms. Fanners and industry officials say that as fertilizer, sludge results in higher yields and cuts water use on agricultural fields, and that public perception rather than evidence of any harm has led to the bans. "The material does nothing other than benefit the farming community in more ways than you can count. It's a wonderful product for the farmers," said Laurie Loter, spokeswoman for Synagro Technologies Inc.,the contractor that hauls the sludge to the reservation. Wakimoto said health and aesthetic concerns aren't an issue for his farm because the closest home to the fields is a mile away. "Tm not too certain that the health concerns are really a relevant issue.... I think the science is there. I think the safety is there," he said. "It provides us the fertilizer that we need." The Fort Mojave tribe is using the fertilizer to get larger harvests of alfalfa, cotton and Bermuda grass,which will be used as dairy feed. 1 The Orange County Sanitation District,which collects and treats sewage for northern and central Orange County,creates 541 wet tons a day of the coal-black sludge.(A wet ton is about 500 pounds.) But the county has been running out of places to send its sludge, especially after Riverside County recently banned its use on farms there. At least 18 other counties in the state have similar restrictions. However,the counties would accept sludge treated to a cleaner level.Using sludge as fertilizer is common across the nation and supported by the Environmental Protection Agency. About 40%of the more than 5 million dry tons produced in 2000 was used as fertilizer. However, the agency has asked the National Academy of Sciences to review potential health risks. Critics argue that the district shouldn't be sending it anywhere,but should be treating it further on site. "They're trucking it to an Indian reservation ... and they still don't get it," environmentalist Doug Korthof said. "If it's such good stuff,why can't they find closer places to stick it?" Orange County sewage officials are taking steps toward removing more disease-causing bacteria,viruses and toxic metals so the sludge will qualify as"Class A." This highly treated sludge can be used as fertilizer in much of California. But this more thorough treatment--likely to be composting or chemical stabilization--is expensive. "Everyone's transitioning to Class A technology," said Brent McManigal, Synagro's senior operations director. "That will take time and money and permits,which don't always mesh with the time frames dictated by the counties." In 2000, the district spent$3.2 million buying an 1,800-acre ranch in central California to dump its sludge,only to have Kings County ban the sludge,starling in 2003.The sewage agency still will be able to send more thoroughly treated sludge there. The district has been paying a landowner in San Bernardino County$500 a day for the last six months in hopes of someday buying that land for a composting facility,but the district is backing away after an accounting report said the deal was risky. So in mid-December,the district began paying Synagro $39.50 per wet ton to truck about one-third of its sludge to the Fort Mojave tribe, which receives $2 per wet ton. The farm also receives small amounts of sludge from two agencies in Riverside County, and a southern Orange County agency.The tribe's reservation stretches across more than 33,000 acres of California,Arizona and Nevada,but the sludge will be used only on the California portion. The tribe is not bound by federal and state sludge rules. However,the sanitation district is requiring the tribe to follow both. One San Bernardino County ordinance is being violated,because the sludge is being applied about 500 feet from a farm well. County law requires a 1/2-mile buffer. The remainder of the district's sludge goes to Kings and Kem counties. Ifyou want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives <htto://www.latimes.com/archives>. For information about reprinting this article, go to www.lats.com/rights <http://www.lats.com/rizhtsl>. Thanks, 2 Carlsbad council clears way for water reclamation project-3/7/02-NCTimes.net Page 1 of 2NORTH COUNTY TIMES , -rea.yaweu•r ' Check The .,,x,...�..».,,,,.....,� 1 -'' Forecast Previous Story 11 Headlines 11 Next Story Our Best Links What We Do Carlsbad council clears way for water reclamation project Keyword Searcb TIM MAYER Advanced Staff Writer CARLSBAD---- The City Council has unanimously approved a deal with the Enema Wastewater Authority for design and construction of facilities needed by both the city and the authority as well as a contract to begin designing a pipeline system to carry recycled water. The regional authority,whose membership includes Carlsbad Vista, Encinitas,the Buena Vista Sanitation District,the Leucadia County Water Authority and the Vallecitos Water District,operates a 25-acre sewage treatment plant on Avenida Encinas in Carlsbad. Carlsbad last year purchased 7 acres of vacant land adjacent to the wastewater plant for$1.5 million and is beginning construction this year of a$38 million recycled water facility at the site. The facility will take treated wastewater from the Avenida Enemas plant and treat and filter it further to initially produce about 4 million to 5 million gallons per day of water clean enough to be used for landscape and golf course irrigation. City Deputy Public Works Director Bob Greaney said the partnership between the city and the wastewater authority trade sense. Authority officials have calculated that they need to build a new storage tank or reservoir to take excess water during heavy winter rains to prevent overloading the outfall pipeline which now carries treated sewage water out to sea,Greaney said. The city will need a storage tank to hold treated sewage water until it can be run through the recycled water plant, especially during summers when demand for reclaimed water for irrigation will be at its peak,he said. "Why build another tank?" Greaney said. "Ifs a win-win situation for everybody." The agreement approved Tuesday calls for the city and authority to share the$11.2 million cost for design and construction of the new storage reservoir and related facilities,with Carlsbad contributing a little less than$3 million as its fair share and the authority paying more than$8 million. Councilwoman Ann Kulchin also said the cooperative agreement made sense. httpJ/www.netimes.net/news/2002/20020307/92327.htm1 03/11/2002 Carlsbad council clears way for water reclamation project-3/7/02-NCTimes.net Page 2 of 2 "It's good for the city of Carlsbad,but it's good for everyone," Kulchin said. And the almost rainless winter helps point out how much the community will need the recycled water should the region enter a drought of the magnitude of the early 1990s, she said. "When we had the drought,we were not flushing our toilets,we were not watering,and we were not filling our pools," Kulcbin said. "We got through it,but having gone through it once our responsibility is to plan ahead and have that vision." In a related action, the council also unanimously approved a$385,746 contract with Boyle Engineering for design of a pipeline system to carry the recycled water inland once the new treatment plant comes on-line in a couple of years. The pipeline project would include about 20,000 feet of 24-inch pipe under Melrose Avenue, Alga Road and El Camino Real and about 800 feet of 18-inch pipeline under Cassia Road. Some 1,350 feet of 12-inch piping would also be installed under El Fuerte Street with 750 feet of 8-inch pipe under another portion of Melrose Avenue. Contact staff writer Tim Mayer at(760) 9014043 or tmayer@netimes.com. 3/7/02 Pr_ev_ious_$tory 11 Headlines 11 N..c_xt$to_ry webmaster(a'netimes.cum Y.1997_2002 North Coin Timm es editorltnctimessom http://www.nctimes.net/news/2002/20020307/92327.htm] 03/11/2002 stM v a nu CEO -L �Yy State of California—Health and Human Services Agency Department of Health Servic or 7 p UTANA Y.NONTA,R.N.,or.P.H. WIgo y2 L/7` GRAY UAV13 Ulractor GO wnor March 6, 2002 Ms. Diana Leach, General Manager Mesa Consolidated Water District 1965 Placentia Ave. P,O. Box 5008 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-5008 Dear Ms. Leach: This is In response to your letter regarding the recent meeting between the District, Orange County Water District, other affected water utilities and me and members of the Department of Health Services staff on the findings of 1,4-dioxarta in your drinking water wells. We appreciated the opportunity to meet with you, and representatives of Orange County Water District and the other affected water utilities to discuss the 1,4-dioxane issue. I believe that the meeting was very informative and resulted in a clearer understanding of the historical use of the Department's Action Levels and thelr present application with regard to 1,4-dioxane. With regard to the application of Action Levels, as we indicated at the meeting, the Department has used Action Levels for more than two decades to provide guidance to water utilities when there is no existing drinking water standard for a chemical. The Action Levels are advisory and are intended to be used by utilities as trigger levels for undertaking certain activities. For example, when a chemical is found above an Action Level we recommend that water utilities carry out monitoring to define the extent of the problem. If the level of a chemical Is found to be very high we recommend removing the affected drinking water source from service, In the case of the 1,4-dioxane recently detected in your drinking water sources, the Department appreciates the prudent precautionary actions taken by you and the other affected water utilities in limiting the use of your 1,4-dioxane affected wells while evaluating the Impact of the 1,4-dioxane problem. We commend Orange County Water District and your agency for your proactive monitoring program and the prompt notification of our offices regarding the detection of 1,4-dioxane in drinking water wells. The levels et 1,4-dioxane that have been reported, although above the Action Level of 3 parts per bllllon, are still very low and do not represent a significant risk to health. Dr-k 1mu Do your part to help California save energy.Tu learn ne do h sating energy,vigil Iho fnpowing web 611e vnrx : .mnwmerenergycmter.org/flexAxfindexAhnl _ _— --714r744 P Sheet P.O.box 942732,MS 216,Seuamenlu,CA 04234-7320 (918)322-23M --- SENT BY:OCWD .-._ Ms. Diana Leach Page 2 March 6, 2002 Consistent with our guidance, we recommend that the affected water utilities continue to track the levels of 1,4-dtoxane In their sources. In eddillon, as we indicated at the meeting, since the levels of 1,4-dioxane do not represent a significant health risk, we agree that it Is not necessary to keep the sources out of service. We also recommend that affected utilities inform their consumers of the levels of 1,4- dioxane and provide an explanation of the issue including Information an the health concerns associated with the chemical,the source of the chemical, activities being taken to track the chemical in the drinking water source and measures being used to control further introduction of the chemical Into the drinking water source. The annual Consumer Confidence Report would be an appropriate method of providing the recommended consumer notice. This approach is consistent with the use of the Consumer Confidence Report as envisioned in both federal and state law as a means of providing the public with information on water quality issues. As we indicated at the meeting,the only statutory requirement associated with Action Levels Is the mandate that when a well contains a contaminant In excess of an Action Level or a well Is closed due to the presence of a contaminant in excess of an Action Level, the water utility must notify the governing body of the local agency in which their customers reside within thirty days. We understand that you have already notified the governing boards of the affected service areas regarding the finding of 1,4-dloxane above the Action Level in wells in your water system. We appreciate your agency's cautious response to the 1,4-dioxane finding and your solicitation of guidance and direction from the Department. If you have any additional questions, please contact me at(916) 322-2308. Sincerely, r �� David P. Spath, Ph.D., E., Chief Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management co' Cindy Forbes John Curphey Frank Hamamura IhW: Jmeery 21,2002 Orange Coumy SeniWlion Mend Monthly Log of Odor Complaints•2002 •_________________________________ PLANTNO.t yy Jen 11 Feb e! Mar I Noy I pee 1M ro ]/5 no Yt 5 Le n0 abnl nhgE To al: 0 M 0 P ANT NO.g Jan II Feb If Mar If A, 11 Ma I' Jun Jet I I I oM ! Nee I pee I Am tnT m rani wma TOW oMe MUMM cwlealron s.amro. Jan $ Feb Mar 11 AIf Jun Jet 11 sea If pet Nm pee Ina LI >h Ina a1 I=m w n0 IIJS M im no M 1110 MI 21YJ M Co pamd C011.:Tdal a TaW a TObI 1 TWI TOW Ttlal TIXaI Tadl idal Ta1Bl TWI TOYI IN=1n-House mmpWnt are nm cOYnletl ec plant nllaMtl(nEipolOE beginnl�Melcb 2001). Rio'.YSHd11 , g'.Iexcel ma\om10Ow CompleiM Lop.Rls Water/NewsAlert - Story Page I of 2 ,A _. - YOUR Orange County Water District Announces New General Manager Business Wire- March 15,2002 15:01 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 15, 2002--The Board of Directors of Orange County Water District(OCWD)today announced Virginia Grebbien as its new general manager effective April 15,2002. Grebbien will be the district's fifth general manager and first woman to lead the groundwater management agency since its inception in 1933. OCWD manages Orange County's large underground basin,which provides 75 percent of the water needs for more than two million people in North and Central Orange County. Grebbien will take over for William R. Mills,who will retire from OCWD after more than 14 years of service to the district. With more than 16 years of experience, Grebbien is well known in the field of water resources management and planning in both Southern California and throughout the State. Currently the Senior Vice President of Project Development for Poseidon Resources Corp., Grebbien has held several management positions including principal engineer for Bookman Edmonston Engineering, general manager of Central and West Basin Municipal Water Districts and manager of the local resource development branch for Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. "Virginia's long-time experience in both the public and private sectors of the water industry,her knowledge of water reuse, her understanding of Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, and her leadership experience at Central and West Basin will ensure OCWD moves forward quickly in addressing the challenges of providing groundwater for this growing,and region. Virginia's experience,skills and energy are a perfect fit for this organization and she will bring many new, exciting opportunities to OCWD," said OCWD Board President Jerry A. King. "I am honored that I have been selected as the new general manager of the Orange County Water District," stated Grebbien. "I am committed to continuing to develop cost-effective, reliable water supplies for Orange County. I support a team environment and look forward to working together with the OCWD board of directors,water retailers and staff members to effectively meet the challenges of Orange County's water future." Grebbien was extensively involved in gaining funding far the largest reclamation project in the state while at Central and West Basin. She has also served on several regional, state and national panels and committees on water policy issues. Grebbien is a professional engineer with a Bachelors of Science Degree in civil engineering from California State Polytechnic University in Pomona. file://C:\TEMP\Water-NewsAlertO/o20-°/.2OStory.htm 03/18/2002 Water/NewsAlert- Story Page 2 of 2 She is a former board member and past president of the WateReuse Association and the founding president of the California WateReuse Research Foundation. Currently,Grebbien is a board member of the California Foundation on the Environment and the Economy and member of the American Water Works Association and Colorado River Water Users Association. Grebbien's extensive involvement in the water community and previous work on landmark water supply development projects will help her carry out OCWD's mission to provide local groundwater producers with a reliable, adequate, high-quality water supply at the lowest reasonable cost. Grebbien and her husband Brent, an aerospace engineer, live in La Habra Heights with their three children, Danielle, age 10 and twins, Alec and Julia, age 5. "On behalf of the OCWD Board, I wish Bill Mills an enjoyable and well-earned retirement and thank him for his many years of service to OCWD as general manager. He will be missed," said King. Orange County Water District is a special agency created by the California State Legislature in 1933 to maintain and manage the groundwater basin under Northern and Central Orange County. OC WD's groundwater basin supplies 75%of the water needs to more than 2 million residents in Anaheim,Buena Park,Costa Mesa,Cypress,Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine,Newport Beach,La Palma,Los Alamitos, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Stanton,Tustin,Villa Park,Westminster,and Yorba Linda. CONTACT: Orange County Water District (OCWD) , Fountain Valley Ron Wilderdi 714/378-3351 or Jenny Glasser, 714/378-3228 l 1 Business Wire pu:•;en,d oY: �i tY -01 : nuum � n file://C:\TEMP\Water-NewsAlert%20-%2OStory.htin 03/18/2002 SECRETARY'S COLUMN Sustainable Infrastructure he UCI Civil and Environmental consequently, best meet community needs". Engineering (CEE) Affiliates are anZ The concept is applicable to any infrastructure important liaison between the universityproject, particularly those that tend to be and the professional practice of civil engineering. controversial. Examplesthat occurtome They were founded al UCI to provide supportinclude the reuse ofcertain aban� Ritaand guidance to the faculty and students of theases, t e soll roa an ig raicivil engineering department as well as acting asa ignments, the approval of t e c aracter and an interface between the local professionalintensity of residential development projects as community and the University. The CEEwell as the selection of wastewater treatment Affiliates include senior executives representingalternatives for ocean disposal. leading civil and environmental engineering firmsDr. Daigger proposes a structured eight-step and many public agencies. There are manydecision analysis process to quantify the members of the Orange County Branchsuslainability of a particular projector decision: represented among the Affiliates. In fact, Dr. Jan Scherfig, ► Comprehensive Identification of the factors affecting this year's Orange County Branch Distinguished Engineering Educator, is a driving force behind the Affiliates project decisions. as one of the faculty coordinators. ► Sorting of the factors into broad categories such as The CEE Affiliates recently sponsored a seminar by Dr.Glen social, economic and environmental. T. Daigger on "The Future of Wastewater Treatment". Dr. ► Grouping similar factors within each category into Daigger is a Senior Vice-President with CH2M-Hill and the succinct and independent factors that define the range former Chairman of the Environmental Systems of the decision making process. Engineering Department at Clemson University. He has ► Arrangement of the independent factors in a value devoted his career to improvement and innovation in the theory and practice of wastewater treatment and is a hierarchy. recognized expert in the field. I attended Dr. Daigger's No Development of a scheme to quantify each of the seminar intending to learn about the latest technological factors in the value hierarchy. developments in wastewater treatment that I might be able to apply in my job at the Irvine Ranch Water District. I was ► Determination of the relative weighting of each of the not disappointed in that regard, but just as interesting was factors. Dr. Daigger's discussion of"sustainable development". ► Objective evaluation of each of the factors according to We are all going to be hearing more of the term sustainable the method developed in step#5. development. It is a subject that is increasingly being ► Multiplication of the technical evaluation in step #7 by discussed in the media as well as in government and the weighting in step#6 to obtain a total score for each industry circles. Our Branch President, Don Curry, has alternative. made it one of his goals to increase awareness among our membership about this important trend in infrastructure The process of alternative selection may still involve planning and design. Our Program Chair, Jessica vigorous debate since individual evaluators may have Mosquera, is planning at least one of our lunch different values, hence different weightings for each of the presentations around this timely topic. Sustainable factors. Decision analysis does provide a framework, development is an approach to project implementation that however,for negotiations among interested groups to select seeks a balance among a variety of desirable outcomes. It an alternative that is acceptable to all (or at least most) of is usually used as a project planning process to incorporate them. The process may not completely replace democratic the prudent use of natural resources, effective protection for public policy debate and good old-fashioned power politics, the natural environment, and social justice for all, with the but it has the potential to turn down the volume, reduce the promotion of high levels of economic growth and ad hominem attacks, and put those debates on a more employment. rational plane. And that could lead to better public policy. In the context of Dr. Daigger's talk, "sustainable The next meeting of the UCI CEE Affiliates will be held on development provides a framework for evaluating and March 15, 2002 at 7:30 AM. Dr.Thomas O'Rourke,Andrew selecting overall wastewater management approaches and Petrow, and Dr. Charles Scawlhome will be discussing associated wastewater treatment plants. Those wastewater "Infrastructure-Reliability and Security". The cost is $15, treatment plants that best balance social, economic, and which includes breakfast. More information is available from environmental concerns are the most sustainable and, UCI at(949) 824-4757, ASCE-OC Newsletter • March 2002-3 1 REBUILD AMERICA COALITION s February 25,2001 Dear Governor Davis: The members of the California Rebuild America Coalition(CalRAC)encourage you to move forward with development and submittal of the five-year infrastructure plan called for under Chapter 606, Statutes of 1999(AB 1473,Hertzberg). We understand that this challenging budget year means that state funding is not available to make a significant investment toward meeting California's state infrastructure needs. An infrastructure plan —independent of economic conditions and the state's current funding capabilities—recognizes the needs regardless of our current ability to address them. It is important that the State of California document these needs as thoroughly as possible so that its leaders can begin to put the policies and mechanisms in place that will enable the State to meet these needs over the longer term. The creation of the five-year plan would provide your administration,the Legislature,and the many stakeholders who are prepared to work with you to seek solutions for this long-term challenge,with much more complete information about the condition of the state's infrastructure,the demands for new capital investment,and the amount of funding needed to address the state's facility requirements. A plan will also make it possible to assess current policies,priorities, and funding criteria. In addition,we believe a five-year infrastructure plan as detailed in AB 1473 can bring much needed attention to important policy issues,such as state,regional and local funding responsibilities for various infrastructure programs. The gaps in the information available will become much more apparent,allowing initiation of additional,focused information gathering and analysis to assist in future funding decisions. For these reasons the members of CeIRAC urge you to reconsider developing and releasing the capital facilities plan called for in AB 1473. Sincerely, Sarah Layton Wallace Executive Vice President For the Members of CaIRAC gist attached) The California Rebuild America Coalition (CaIRAQ is a non-profit, broad-based organization whose mission is to build support for dedicated and consistent sources of funding sufficient to sustain California's vital infrastructure facilities and systems. AB 2698 Assembly Bill - INTRODUCED Page l of 4 Tappan, Jean From: Arhonles,Nick Sent: Monday, March 04,2002 3:12 PM To: Tappan, Jean Cc: Anderson, Blake;Streed,Gary; Dolan, Robert Subject: FW:AB 2698 Assembly Bill-INTRODUCED Jean: This new Bill may be a good attachment for a future Board Letter. Nick. —Original Message—•- From:McNally,Patrick Sent:Monday,March 04,2002 3:03 PM To:Arhontes,Nick Subject:AB 2698 Assembly Bill-INTRODUCED BILL NUMBER: AB 2698 INTRODUCED BILL TEXT INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Cox FEBRUARY 22, 2002 An act to repeal and add Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 16407) of Chapter 2 of Part 1.5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code, relating to state infrastructure financing, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 2698, as introduced, Cox. Infrastructure financing. he Governor to submit annually a proposed s 5-Year infrastructure olaq to the Legislature. This bill would delete obsolete provisions relating to the former Capital Outlay and Savings Fund and create the California Twenty-First Century Infrastructure Investment Fund (Infrastructure Investment Fund) in the State Treasury. The bill would transfer a specified percentage of revenues from the General Fund to the Tntrestructure Fund commencing In the 2003-04 fiscal year for ,•-pump t' by the LegislataM The bill would provide that primary responsibility for preparing an annual plan to expend these funds shall be in the Department of Finance unless the Governor directs another state agency to carry out this responsibility. The bill would also provide that the Infrastructure Investment Fund and its related provisions shall not become operative until the Legislature enacts a statute to allocate the revenues in the fund. 03/04/2002 AB 2698 Assembly Bill-INTRODUCED Page 2 of 4 The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares the following: (a) An investment in California's infrastructure is an investment in California'a future. The quality of life in California depends on the quality of our children's education and on the condition of the state-s transportation network, water system, and parks. (b) California'a education, transportation, and resource infrastructure is critically underfunded. The State Department of Education estimates a thirty-six billion dollar ($36,000,000,000) need to build classrooms for our school children. While the population of the state has increased by 50 percent, and the number of vehicles on the road has doubled, the state highway system is the same size today as it was 25 years ago. The California Transportation Commission has documented one hundred eighteen billion dollars ($118,000,000,000) in unmet transportation needs. (c) Over the course of the next 10 years, California faces an eighty-two billion dollar ($82,000,000,000) to ninety billion dollar ($90,000,000,000) shortfall in its infrastructure investment, as estimated by the Department of Finance and the California Business Round Table. (d) California has often used bonds to pay for infrastructure investments. However, bonds alone can not dent the magnitude of California's infrastructure investment deficit. According to the Department of Finance's 1999 Capital Outlay and Infrastructure Report, if California issued thirty-two billion dollars ($32,000,000,000) in new bonds, 6 percent of the state's future annual budgets would be committed to repay the debt. (a) In addition, bonds are the most costly and most dangerous way to pay for improvements. For every two dollars ($2) California raises to improve our infrastructure, an additional one dollar ($1) moat be spent to pay the bankers and investors who finance the bonds. The total cost to repay thirty-two billion dollars ($32,000,000,000) in bonds would exceed fifty billion dollars ($50,000,000,000) . If California's economic growth again slows down, bonds must still be repaid, squeezing out investments in education, child care, and other important programs. (f) According to the Legislative Analyst's 1998 report, Overhauling the State's Infrastructure Planning and Financing Process, the state needs to take two main steps to provide a more stable funding source for our infrastructure needs: dedicate a given level of General Fund resources for infrastructure, and reserve a greater proportion of the spending for pay-as-you-go financing. (g) In the 19608, when California created the nation's finest education and transportation systems, the state routinely committed seven to 10 times more of the General Fund to capital outlays than we do today. (h) Establishing a California Twenty-First Century Infrastructure Investment Fund and slowly increasing the amount of the General Fund committed to capital outlays is the only realistic prospect California has to reverse 25 years of neglect of our infrastructure. Such a program could conservatively be expected to raise over seventy-five billion dollars ($75,000,000,000) in the next 20 years. 03/04/2002 AB 2698 Assembly Bill - INTRODUCED Page 3 of 4 (i) The California Twenty-First Century Infrastructure Investment Fund will also protect against the risks of bonded indebtedness. By limiting the annual growth of the Infrastructure Investment Fund to no more than 25 percent of annual General Fund growth, education, child care, and other necessary services will be protected during periods of economic recession. SEC. 2. Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 16407) of Chapter 2 of Part 1.5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code is repealed. SEC. 3. Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 16407) is added to Chapter 2 of Part 1.5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code, to read: Article 5.5. Infrastructure Investment Fund 16407. (a) The California Twenty-First Century Infrastructure Investment Fund is hereby created in the State Treasury for the purpose of funding capital outlay expenses that are related to corrections, education, parks, transportation, and water or other natural resources related projects. Primary responsibility for preparing an annual plan to expend these funds shall be in the Department of Finance, unless the Governor directs another state agency to carry out this responsibility. (b) For purposes of this article, "Infrastructure Investment Pund- means the California Twenty-First Century Infrastructure Investment Fund. 16408. (a) Revenues shall be transferred from the General Fund to the Infrastructure Investment Fund, on an annual basis, according to the following schedule: Percentage of Fiscal Year General Fund 2003-04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.O1 2004-05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 1.5% 2005-06 . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.01, 2006-07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5% 2007-08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . 3.0W 2008-09 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . 3.54 2009-10 . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 4.04 2010-11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 4.3% 2011-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0% Each subsequent fiscal year . . . . . . . 5.0% (b) Notwithstanding the percentages specified in subdivision (a) , if General Fund revenues increase by less than 3 percent from the prior year, the increase in the amount of General Fund revenues that are transferred to the Infrastructure Investment Fund compared to the transfer in the prior year shall not exceed an amount equivalent to 25 percent of the increase in General Fund revenues relative to the prior year. (c) If the General Fund has 0.0 percent or negative growth compared to the prior year, then the percentage of the General Fund revenues transferred to the Infrastructure Investment Fund shall remain at the level specified for the prior year. (d) This section shall not be construed to affect the state-s minimum funding obligation pursuant to Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution. 16409. This article shall not become operative until the 03/04/2002 AB 2698 Assembly Bill -INTRODUCED Page 4 of 4 Legislature enacts a statute to allocate the revenues in the Infrastructure Investment Fund. The statute shall do all of the following: (a) Require that 75 percent of these moneys be annually distributed to cities and counties, on a continuously appropriated basis, for local infrastructure expenses. (b) Create an oversight panel to ensure that locally allocated funds are spent for eligible infrastructure projects. (c) Require that the remaining 25 percent of the revenues in the Infrastructure Investment Fund be subject to annual appropriation by the Legislature. SEC. 4. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are: In order to ensure that adequate funding is available to make vitally necessary improvements in state infrastructure facilities, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately. 03/04/2002 3 Table of Contents C^L1Fe2flfA C0A^M%&Sroa✓ 90to-owri Fee rfM �1 i� Cc-nJT�.e.`/ X. Executive Summary 2 What is InfrasImportant?re and Why is ItImportant? 10 ,V.,,T..lpair,ll.nn Q6I i. Who is Responsible for Infrastructure? 14 Today's California:Opportunities and Challenges 18 f The Vision for 2020 22 Guiding Principles 24 The Eight Building Blocla of California Infrastructure 28 Educational Facilities 32 Energy 38 Housing 44 Land Use 52 Public Facilities 60 !■ Technology 66 Transportation 72 Water 82 -v (M CG VpIF6 Financing Infracbac[ure for the 21st Century 90 As We Go Forward 98 Acknowledgemenrs IN 1 [ABLE Of CONTENTS i - WAS* Invest fo. - r Strate'fo �`s: :f " ' Iifornia's Future aspety ;ataV.uality of 1.4'' 's'.c: ; Water S, GOAL FOR 2020 ;.. T. Ensure a reliable supply of affordable high quality water to meet the needs of residents, = W _ businesses, agriculture and the environment. 'Much of what we value about California is dmuarted to our water environment Protecting this environment,effichendv and eliertiveiy putting wafer to good uses and ensuring adequate and safe water supplies am asendal In Sustaining the California dream. We can have it all;watrrfor people,fish and wildlife,industries and agriculture. but without nut Whether It be time.talent oramey,these invest- meets are fundamrn(a/to ensuring California's prosperity." - wrm H.H.1Nx kunary UFAw aEmupm lRM%Pw Ap INVEST FOR CALIFORNIR LIFO �Z1• Today's Issues People.wildlife,agriculture and recreation depend upon water for existence.Our diverse industrial economy requires a reliable,high quality water supply.Water is a key component of all life and has been the subject of struggle and competition throughout 'Since the 1960s. there our States history.In order to meet our water needs.California must provide reliable have been no real additions and efficient water infrastructure systems to our water intmartr artme. It is my belief that unfair WATER SUPPLY we begin to build an infra- Our water supply will continue to be strained based on expectations for future demand structure, then we'roguing to be in the same situation due to growth and competing needs for water sources.Future economic and population wiN watt/as we are today growth will significantly expand the use of our already limited water supply and we with electricity." cumendv do not know whether supply will meet our needs.Today,our groundwater U.S.Senator Oiame Feinstein. basins are over-drafted and surface storage alone cannot meet future water demand. Capital Alert:Californians Try,to Find Cannon Grouts an Water especially during droughts.In addition.our long-term future water supply may be less From.,2.2001 predictable due to factors such as climate changes,which could lead to smaller snow- packs and earlier melting in the Sierras.There will be increasing competition for water from the Bay-Delta system among agricultural,urban and environmental needs,and new or expanded reservoirs proposed by CALFED will lake many years to construct. In Southern California,the 4.4 Plan requires that we reduce our dependence on rl _ Some California Water Facts: In 1999,there were 694 beach closure days and 4,186 beach warning days due to contamination. :r'a x it It can take 20 years(or longer)to dewlap and finance a supple- mental water supply for new developments. Over 500 bodies of water have been listed as impaired. About 22 million people.two-thirds of California's population,rely on the Bay Delia for all or some portion of their drinking water. ry:-o About 894 gallons of water are needed to grow the food for the daily rO diet of an average person.On an annual basis,an individual's water use - is about 326,310 gallons. From 19854998,California agriculture's use of developed!water supplies M.lake.Cauromna dropped approximately 12%,due in part to the use of water efficient a „o�,n.awxn irrigation techniques like sprinklers and micro-drip. In 2001,the State Water Project delivered 35%of the water entitlements of 83 its customers because of below normal runoff to state reservoirs WAT'R the Colorado River from our current level of 5.2 mullion acre-feet(MALF)per year to 4.4 MAF per year over the next few decades.Conjunctive use programs represent an oppor "Bullding new mmmunl tles tunity to Increase the amount of water captured and stared for use,while maintaining !aster than watvsupplles ran be acquired to serve them an environmental balance. pun existing businesses, WATER PLANNING agriculture,residents.and the environment at risk. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR)oversees the state's water erpvia/lyduringfuture resources,but comprehensive broad-based planning is difficult due to gaps in data droughts.Early linkage and the complevjry of the state's water delivery systems.Current conveyance,treatment. between land use and water water facilities ownership and oversight are fragmented;there are thousands of separate supply planning Is essential water authorities that serve the slate's population.This fragmentation Increases the because today it can take 20years(or longer)to difficulty of having a coordinated approach for assessing and delivering adequate water develop and finance a supply and employing sharing techniques.We also have limited information on water supplemental water supply." supply in groundwater basins.Many communities do not plan for and assess the impact ust Be,Passaged of increased development and water needs on the regions water supply.Communities Utility Distritt • must also plan for and manage Hood risk.Current site design and land use patterns contribute to good risk through channeling of high volumes of runoff and reduced water percolation. WATER QUALITY Maingining and improving residential,industrial and environmental water quality Is essential.In developed areas,contaminants have entered groundwater and surface water through sources such ss leaking underground storage tactics and septic systems,i s well as Iq contaminated soils.Low-density development parierms increase y- runoff and lawn treatment techniques contribute to water contown nation.In non-urban areas.pesticides,nutrients and salts have - entered groundwater and surface waters.Overlogging and improper mine closures in rural areas have changed the natural landscape and impacted water quality.Urban runoff and sewer overflows from aging and inadequate infrastructure have resulted in beach closures. ocean water pollution and fresh water contamination.The control of nonpoint source pollution(polluted run-off from surface cress i i like roads.lawns and fields)continues to be a challenge.Wastewater i treatment facilities will require significant investment in order to 84 8 increase capacity and merely maintain today's quality standards for the furore.Innova[Ive,regional site-specific vestment approaches s�I will be needed,as well as the mechanisms to fund them. Lortumpil,dx Stem mowperk to determine water kwh. Skma Mved.Mounnuu.Calif rot. INVEST FOR CALIFORNIA CASE STUDY Creation Uses of$ete Rew/ving Loan Furlds 'The passage of "w In California,the Nature California's Parks and _ Conurvwry received a State Water Bonds minerrnts a Revolving fund loan from historic downpayment on the California State Water the future qualityoffile Resources Control Board to in our State.' p = r purchase more than 120.000 -- •rr. acres of ranchland,place CAWnOr Gray�m �•�_ conservation easements on the land..it then fe:ell it to ia ranching tympany m assist i with repaying the loan. s i ~� a The City of New York set aside e� •� S260 million for land acgmsi tion and conservation case. If - menu I.areas needed to protect its water supply.Of this total amount.S27 million was granted from the State Revolving Fund. Actions Taken . In Ohm.the Water Polluhdn Control Low Fund provided Last year,at the recommendation of this Commission and with the support over 511 million in IPJOa to a of the Governor and the Legislature,the voters approved Proposition 13,me M1ausirhg development company water bond A combination of Proposition ll and General Funds has been for a wide variety of stfuctural allocated for improved water supply area quality:proteclim of watersheds. Area other best management coastal waters area groundwater resources:drought Wourahon:and flood practices that protected an sensual and pmtectitn. important watershed.Also an Ohio.watenrelated funds The Governor,the Legislature.the Federal government and Inoril agriwl- have been usm fa Urowniie,d tural.environmental and urban stakeholders adopted and have begun to emendation.The State Nam, implement the historic CALFED plan for Improving water supply and quality Revolving Fund program pro 1mm the Bay Delta and restoring this important ecosystem, viand a loan for the catchup of contaminated groundwater Califorma's Colorado River Water Use Plan outlines how the State will reduce and sails in a 20-acre Imusuial Colorado River use to 4.4 MAF per year site in Cleveland to prepare the Governor's Advisory Drought Planning NMI completed a contingency plan the area for wmmeraal reuse. for mitigating the impacts of critical water shortages. Source:livede Places Update.Local Wwrmint Commsswns Cover I. Through financial incentives and Implementing legislation,the State has amble Cammuvoes encouraged groundwater storage and the conjunctive use of surface and groundwater supplies. 85 WATER CASE STUDY Investing for Storage. Water California's Future S�aro1F:Diamond Valley Loa,Caftimnia This is the largest earthen The Commission has idendred the following priorities for meeting our water needs. dam project in the United States.It was started in 1995 • Continuing to provide Legislative support for water planning and by the Metropolitan Water infrastructure development District and is currently in operation.Diamond Valley Lake • hnplementing CALPED and Proposition 13,the State water bond provides 800.000 acre feet of water capacity.The reservoir • Employing water conservation,reryrling and mclamation techniques has increased the amount of transfer,Expanding water that can be stored ' use of watransfer, above-graund in Southern • Conducting statewide,integrated research andplanning for water fnfrastructure. California by almost 50%, up to 2 million acre-feet of Imperially for water and land use planning storage capacity.The reservoir , fmlementin water stare through improves the stability of the p g storage g groundwater banking,off-stream storage Southern California water and conjunctive use techniquer supply and will reduce the power required to pump water over the northern mountains. Smoser Just Ariwoorimes Recommended Options All 15.20m The following recommended options will help achieve our priorities: FINANCING AND FISCAL POLICY ^. •.� 'Manufacturers and ' Secure local and federal financial commitments other large employers to CALFED. need tojoin with jr ' farmers. water districts ' Create state incentives for conservation and s°i_ .� vo andenvimnmentalfsu implementation of Best Management Practices to link development with (BMPs)for business,residential and agricultural water planning." �SR, uses,such as gray water irrigation,low now San Jose Ment,News appliances and drip Irrigation systems. ENtanel.June 20.2001 • Develop additional incentives to encourage locally controlled groundwater management. • Leverage matching funds from the federal and local governments and other Third parry sources. 86 INVIST FOR CALIFORNIA CASE STUDY IMPROVED IMPLEMENTATION AND USE lnstitutlanai Were, Continue Implementation of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Conservation:University of California,Santa Barbara Begin implementation of the 4.4 Plan,which includes lining of the All American The University of California, and Coachella Canals and Implementing groundwater storage programs. Santa Barbara implemented an Encourage conjunctive use of surface and groundwater supplies.especially in the institutional water efficiency Central Valley and Southern California. program that led to significant water and cost savings.Through . Increase the capacity of existing facilities or build new water treatment facilities costcffective indoor and out. door conservation efforts,total and collection systems(sewers). Campus water use was reduced • Develop additional standards for'green site design and landscaping in reduce runoff. by nearly 50%between 1987 and 1994,even as the Campus Utilize technology and innovation to improve efficiency In existing water systems. population increased.7oal cos[ • Complete the federally and Sate-funded Sacramento-San Joaquin Rivers Basin savings to the Campus for the years 1989 through 1996 from Comprehensive Study,which includes flood damage reduction and ecosystem efficiency improvements were restoration measures for the Central Valley. approximately S0.7 million, excluding energy and mainte ' Increase capacity to manage storm water,urban water runoffand combined o-� nonce savings, sewer overflow. Source:'Sustainable Use of Vixi Provide public education on Conservation practices and pollution prevention practices. Colilemis Saturn Store pacific IN4W@,Nnualy lads Y } " b�•4 � `�Mr1��� i 1 e BB Kern-Friam Canal.Las k vla.CalJorma IINVEST FOR CALIFORNIA Elements of the CALFED Program: LONG-TERM LEVEE PROTECTION PLAN.Provides significant improvements in the reliability of levees WATER QUALITY PROGRAM.Makes significant reductions in point and m npoint source pollution for the berwflt of all water uses and fine gay-Delta ecosystem. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROGRAM. Providessignificant improvements,in habitat,restoration of oftical ecological Processes and species papulatima and reduces conflict with other Bay-Delta system resources WATER USE EFFICIENCY PROGRAM. Encourages water recycling and efficient use of water for agricultural purposes urban purposes,and managed wetlands by Providing support and incentives at Due local level, including expanded planning,technical and financial assistance. WATER TRANSFERS PROGRAM. Provide,A framework of actiorts, policies and processes to facilitate,wrcourage,and streamline an active and properly regulated water market Nat will allow water to move between users,including Environmental uses,on a voluntary and compensated basis WATERSHED PROGRAM.Protrudes locally-led watershed management activities and protections relevant to achieving CALFED goals through Financial and technical assisWce STORAGE. Neargroundwaterardforsurfacestorage will bedeveloped and constructed,together WIN aggressive implementation of water,conservation, rerycling,and a protective water transfer market Evaluate and da monies the appropriate mix of surface water and groundwater storage-identify acceptable projects and initiate permitting and construction if program linkages and �— condrtmin,are satisfied. Q ELTA CO NV EYA N C E. Since CALFED will depend on the existing Delta conveyance system with wine medificatiore,evaluate its effectiveness and add additional conveyance and/or other water management actions if necessary to achieve GAITED goals and abjactfves sow[e:CNFEb Y}aeb NWam 89 WATER IMPROVED PLANNING CASE STUDY • Complete the update of the 5-year California,Wier Plan,scheduled for release in 2003. Waver Flaw Twenofell Far Waver f-wrervarion: • Create and agree upon projecdmu for statewide and regional water needs and an assess- Air Irycr rase frrigaude ment of supply as a foundation for developing a statewide water infrastructure plan. farm operations forestry ind IiWsrape/reaeation managers • Determine the structural components needed to address nonpoint sources are using Awarded water tons- of pollution. nology,in he areas of communb cations and automatic control systems,global pos umulag a - systems pumping filtriinn, piping ark plant and sod apex �a a[iom.'Names efh[ierxy rates le, increas 40%zi.e from approximatelymsea _. � P..r ��•i JO°e:o over i0'6.tale�n scare L-- - - - a osee up to 85%,win the use of advanced'sater rology and management.for example. a air injrepresent recent on systems represent a resent temndlogiol breakthrough.They create smy bubbles that mix throughout Dnptrngedm"rexpmaxred Cwsandmrdla Oren,F..C.1dif-a subsurface drip mlit.non:water. The ilyeded it results in an • Develop and implement statewide watershed policy with support for collaboration improved soil envbonment and with local watershed interest groups. increases in root masses and crop yields.Tests of me new • Implement policy that requires future development to identify reliable and technology revealed a 09% sufficient water supply. :rcrease;n crop yield.The Crate+ for Irrigation Technology it • Provide incentives to conduct regional water planning and noodplain management. Ulf.State unmrvty,fresco x waamg with the Carats. • Integrate water supply planning with land use planning and other infrastructure in : J font Futaoe Inuat te.Me general plans. —� Fresno 3 imsss Counnl.me _ Jmve-rnry 3usmess tenter ana BARRIER REMOVAL the Great Valley Center to part.wed water tecnmogy • Seek delegation from federal agencies to incorporate federal environmental companies in researcn.dea:lop- requirements in state environmental processes. mend.saturation and market development of water[law and • Streamline CEQA to expedite the delivery of projects while ensuring that the process technology. original intent of protecting the environment is maintained. Sauce:Ceram Cadfona Elaves Imatuw.Aa;l Eodt • Streamline the process for water transfers.while mitigating possible adverse third parry impacts. Clarify the wheeling statute for water transfers.which facilities transfers between water 87 agencies and districts at-fair compensation when unused opacity is available. • Consolidate retail and wholesale water agencies and districts. WATER Business,Transportation and Housing Agency:News and Public Meeting Notices Page I of 2 California Home nnonca, Business TransportMion Business, Transportation & Housing Agency 8 Housing Agency Ho. AboinU G News&Public Meeting Invest for California Notices Departments Final Report of the Commission on Building for the 21st Century: Invest for California-Strategic Planning for Callfomia's Future Prosperity and Oualit, Boards 8 Commissions Other Government Links • Commission Letter Lacs Hear From You • 01-Repon Cover • 02-Commissioner List • 03-Chair and Ca.Chair Letter . 04-Governor Gray Davis'Charge to the Commission • 05-Table of Contents T • 06-Executive Summary T- • 07-What is Infrastructure and Why is It Important . 08-Who is Responsible for Infrastructure T . 09-Todav's California Ocponumties and Challenges • 10-The Vision for 2020 . 11-Guiding Principles 7 ®y, a 12-The Eight Building Blocks of California Infrastructure • "� SAS . 13-Educational Facilities . 1414�31 . 15-Hour rag T or . 16-Land Use . 17-Public Facilities . 18-Technoloov . 19-Transportation r n pA 5 • 20-Water 1 1 . 21-Financing Infrastructure for the 21 st Century • 22-As We Go Forward T . 23-A Call To Action Ix uP httP://www.bth.ca.gov/invest4cal 3/4/02 Business,Transportation and Housing Agency: News and Public Meeting Notices Page 2 of 2 • ea-nwluwi•uuenieurs- • Full Report TRequires Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available as a FREE download from Adobe. Bads to Too of PM e 2000 Slate of Galilomia.Gmy Davis,Govamor Cent of Gs• Pn a Pofp httP://www.bth.ca.gov/invest4ca/ 3/4/02 SCAP MONTHLY UPDATE March 2002 A Message from the Executive Director... SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE OF Meetings. Is there anything more paradoxical than PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS meetings? You can sit through hours of them, so bored out of your mind that you have resorted to counting the tiny dots in the acoustical ceiling tile over your head. Suddenly, someone will say something and you realize with a piercing sense of clarity that you have just obtained an invaluable piece of information, one that changes the course of your day or even, your life. [Editorial Note: When the first paragraph contains this kind of hyperbole, you might want uncomine Meetings to look for a tall pair of boots to get through the rest of the article]. Coming Soon-SCAP PR Committee Which is how I came to think about the Napoleonic Code. _2"Public Relations Workshop. Now, many of you probably consider me to be a pretty Amero- Watch for announcement. centric [Editorial Note: I have no idea if that is a word or not, and The SCAP PR Committee,building on if it's not, you heard it here first] person. Well, you wouldn't be the workshop it presented in totally wrong, but actually, I have a lot of respect for Europe, and September 2001,has prepared another their history fascinates me. Okay, their food fascinates me, but half-day workshop on PR issues their history Is pretty good too. pertinent to every agency. See the announcement under Public Those of you who've traveled a bit, and perhaps run into a bit Relations in this issue for more of legal trouble in France, Spain, Peru or even Louisiana, may be details. familiar with the Code Napoleon. It has some fun parts to it, like a The Intersection of Wastewater and wife is the possession of her husband, and everything she owns, Non-Point Sources-Legal,Financial including stuff from before their marriage, is his. Father's even and Technical Issues. had the right to imprison their children at will. [Editorial Note: We now call this "Little League Baseball" and parents are imprisoned SCAP is in the planning stages of with their children for a mandatory five-month period]. workshop/forum on issues surrounding non-point source To be fair, there is a lot of good stuff in the Code. Fifty years discharges-both diversions into before we ended slavery, the Code granted equality to all men. treatment plants and the effect of the Stormwater NPDES permits that have Prescriptive and riparian water rights are spelled out as simply been adopted by various regional and eloquently as you'd ever want to see. In fact, the whole thing boards. is much clearer and more straightforward than our judicial code. But, naturellement, the thing that the Napoleonic Code is most This workshop would targeted at famous for is giving us the legal concept of"Guilty until proven General Managers innocent." Members as we attempt Boardget to geet ahead of the curve and anticipate the effect these regulations will have on our This would be the concept where you are innocently walking industry. More and more we are down the street, see a half empty bottle of beer sitting on the being looked at to solve non-point sidewalk where some child could get to it. You pick up the bottle problems. The date,time and location of beer intending to throw it in the trash, but before you do, you of the workshop will be announced bring it to your nose to sniff to see if it's still good. Right about ASAP. then you hear, "levez se vos mains" or"Put your hands up." Air Quality Committee-Thursday, [Editorial Note: Please do not email me regarding errors in March 7,2002, 10-12 noon,LACSD. French linguistics, I only edit English text, and that only under duress.] The next thing you know you have been convicted for 30200 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD,SUITE a•SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO.CA 92675 EMAIL: k' (dscao mail •PHONE:(949)489.7676•FAX:(949)489-0150 Monthly Update 2 March 2002 drinking in public ('You Americans are all alike!') because you couldn't prove that you weren't—or at least that's what I've been told. This same scenario, under our good 'ol Habeas Corpus ('Innocent until proven guilty') concept, would probably involve a conversation with a police officer, walking a chalk line and an admonishment not to smell the beer before it is thrown into the trashcan. So consider our current 303(d) listing process. It would be fair to say that some of the water bodies on that list have been considered impaired until we prove that they are not, and up until a week ago, I would've thought we'd have a better chance submitting our comments on the new list in French than English. But then Craig Wilson and Laura Sharpe came down and met with us about how they will conduct the listing process and I'm seeing Habeas Corpus's all over the place. It was refreshing to have an honest discussion about this issue and see the thoughtful and intelligent consideration our comments were given. It wasn't all moonlight and daisies either. Many of our SCAP members related compelling reasons and strong feelings about what this process has wrought to-date, but Craig and Laura took it all under consideration. This is what we would like SCAP to always be, and what it was always conceived to be—a forum to maintain communication with regulators before, during and after the promulgation of regulations. I'd like to thank Mas Dojiri and Clayton Yoshida of the City of Los Angeles for hosting and organizing the meeting, and Mary Jane Forster Foley for arranging for Craig and Laura to come down. Vive la SWRCB! Here's hoping that Craig and Laura will draft a listing policy that is Napoleonic Code- like in its clear, logical and easily understood writing, while incorporating a hefty dose of Habeas Corpus. Viva le SCAM Ray Miller Water Issues TMDL Chief Meets with SCAP Water Committee During an almost six-hour marathon meeting, SWRCB staff members Craig J. Wilson and Laura Sharpe met with over 35 SCAP members and listened to our concerns and suggestions as they work to prepare the 2002 303(d) Listing for submittal to EPA by October 2002, and ultimately, to develop a policy for placing and removing water bodies on the 303(d) List. The City of Los Angeles hosted the meeting on February 21 at their Hyperion Treatment Plant and prepared a presentation summarizing SCAP's concerns. Extensive interaction and commentary occurred with the two SWRCB reps as agencies told their stories about listings made using one data point, a listing caused by the loss of riparian trees along a creek allowing algae to grow (and had nothing to do with discharges into the creek), and fears that the adoption of further TMDLs (like the trash and bacteria ones adopted in Los Angeles)will bankrupt cities and other public agencies. Mr. Wilson explained that the SWRCB reorganized its staff to deal with TMDLs and AB982 gave new TMDLs a new focus; they now have 15-20 people working on TMDLs at the state level. The Public Advisory Group (PAG) required under AB982 has 24 members (including one wastewater representative). Monthly Update 3 March 2002 They came up with several comments and suggestions on how the listing process should occur and are looking at those comments to determine which ones should be incorporated into the process. While the environmental and regulated communities that participated in the PAG disagreed on many issues, they did agree on two points: Move quickly to approve TMDLs and conduct further study on segments that need TMDLs. All nine regional boards submitted their 303(d) lists to the state by December 2001. Since then, the SWRCB has been reviewing this information with the goal of developing a defensible 303(d) List; they are very close to completing their review and have a target date of April 2 for public distribution of the proposed list. The comment period that will be provided has not been identified, but they are looking at a minimum of 45 days. Two public hearings will be conducted, one in the north and one in the south (probably in Ontario). Mr. Wilson commented that 400 new listings have been requested by the various regional boards; roughly 21 listings for every 1 delisting. When asked if the data submitted to justify listings looked sufficient, he noted that each listing varied, but overall, it was more substantial and of better quality than the information submitted for the 1998 listings. He also noted that he will start with a "0-based list,"that is, they will be examining the 1998 listings as well as the new listings requested. Each listing will have to stand based upon similar criteria. Significant discussion ensued regarding the criteria used to make a listing. Commenters noted that waterways that had never had a municipal water use, but were listed as MUN by a regional board, were listed. Others commented that"Best Professional Judgment" had been abused in the past as a criteria used for listing a water body. The free exchange of information, ideas and comments— both from the SWRCB and attendees—was appreciated by all in attendance. Mr. Wilson asked that the comments made at the meeting be summarized and submitted to him as a formal request. Microbiological Source Trackina Workshop Held On February 5, the EPA, SWRCB, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project and the National Water Research Institute brought together nationally recognized experts in environmental microbiology, molecular biology and microbial detection methods to better define the current state of knowledge regarding source-tracking techniques. Microbiological source tracking methods are potentially powerful tools that are increasingly being used to define the nature of water-quality problems in watersheds across the nation. While these techniques show much promise, most are still in the early stages of development. Many have been tested in a limited number of watersheds and with a limited number of possible sources. Public agencies across California are preparing to spend millions of dollars in applying these techniques to identify sources of bacteriological water contamination. The workshop presenters made clear that these techniques are s811 not refined and standardized enough to make them the definitive answer for source tracking. Monthly Update 4 March 2002 OCSD Announces Plan to Disinfect Wastewater Dlscharae to Ocean OCSD General Manager Blake Anderson announced on February 22 that the agency will take Immediate steps to install disinfection facilities at the Sanitation District. On February 12, the District obtained ocean monitoring results that Indicted that the District's discharge plume had traveled up a submarine canyon and came within one-half mile of the shore in 45 feet of water. The discharge plume was not evident at the District's other sampling stations and the bacteria readings taken at shoreline sampling stations indicated that bacteria levels were well within AB 411 standards for beach water. The District noted that In the past they have stated that if there is ever an indication that their wastewater discharge is shown to contribute, or likely to contribute to exceedances of water quality standards in recreational zones, the District would take immediate action to correct the problem. Working with various regulatory agencies, the District has a goal of designing and constructing disinfection facilities by May 22, employing temporary disinfection facilities while they work towards a permanent solution. This action is being taken independent of any decision on the type of treatment technology-including secondary treatment that the District will be considering in applying for renewal of their NPDES permit. LARWQCB List of Impaired Water Bodies (303(d) List) Raw Data Available SCAP has obtained a CD of the raw data that the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board used in the 2002 Regional Water Quality Assessment and update of the 303(d) List of Impaired Water Bodies. A copy of this CD is available from the SCAP office upon request. LA Region SCAP members should check the LARWQCB's website for the updated staff report and water body-specific fact sheets for the 2002 update of the 303(d) List of Impaired Water Bodies. Recent revisions to the staff report, fact sheets, and draft 303(d) List have been made. Check the website under "Water Quality Issues" at www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwacb4. Air Rule 1133 Composting Emissions Study Awarded to CH2M HIII Air Committee Chair Brian Whitaker reports that the Emissions Study Steering Committee (comprised of a representative from each of the six agencies that are funding the study plus the Air Committee Chair)has selected CH2M HIII to conduct the Composting Emissions Study. The Steering Committee expressed their belief that CH2M had put together an "all-star team" comprised of experts In composting and source and flux testing within the funding limits of the Committee. To recap: The SCAQMD is proposing to adopt Rule 1133 that, In Its first draft, called for all composting facilities to be completely enclosed and covered to capture and ventilate ammonia and VOC emissions through a control device such as a biofiiter. The goal would be to effect a 75 to 90 percent reduction in these emissions being released to the atmosphere. This reduction criteria was based upon data obtained by the AQMD from an open windrow composting operation. The purpose of the study will be to evaluate the emissions from at least one other kind of technology to establish that all composting doesn't have to be enclosed, covered and vented to a biofllter to achieve emissions that are within acceptable ranges to the AQMD. The AQMD has approved the general protocols for the study; CH2M Hill will be responsible for obtaining specific protocol approvals from them. Monthly Update 5 March 2002 The study will commence the week of March 11 with the creation of two aerated static piles at the City of Los Angeles' Griffith Park composting operation; one pile will be negatively aerated and one pile will be positively aerated. Sludge will be obtained from the CLA's Hyperion Plant (mesophysically digested) and greenwaste will be provided from CSDLA's Puente Hills greenwaste program. Ammonia (precursor to particulate matter) and non-methane VOC (precursor to ozone) sampling will occur at various points in the composting, curing and storage phases. Odors emanating from the operation are specifically excluded from this study, as the proposed Rule doesn't address them. A report is expected by July. The AQMD is scheduled to publish a technical assessment—the basis for rulemaking—in March. On April 5, a pre-hearing will be conducted with the AQMD Board to get direction on the types of controls; adoption of the Rule would occur sometime this summer. The Committee is working to at least have the Board adopt a rule that provides for consideration of advancements in technology and that would not automatically require the enclosure of composting operations. In a related issue, much of the$150,000 cost is due to the requirement by AQMD that only analyses using approved AQMD methods are valid. Concurrent with performing these analyses, the consultant will also use portable devices that allow more economical analysis. If this data can show a relationship between the portable devices and the expensive lab analyses, a request will be made for AQMD to revise their standards to allow this type of data collection and analysis. Blosolids NRC Requested to Submit Report on Biosolids Applied to Land Soon Biosolids Chair Diane Gilbert submitted the following reports: EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman sent a letter on February 12, 2002 to the executive director of the National Research Council (NRC) encouraging timely completion of the study entitled "Risks from Toxicants and Pathogens in Biosolids Applied to Land." In January 2001, the EPA requested that a study be performed to assess the science that supports the Part 503 regulations and guide the Agency in making future decisions concerning these regulations. The study is scheduled for release by the end of May 2002. The letter restates the Agency's intent to use the current NRC study as a key component in determining its future course on sewage sludge regulatory activities. The EPA plans to release the study for public review and comment prior to making any regulatory or programmatic decisions on sewage sludge land application. Associated Press Articles on Biosoiids Program Published Several articles appeared in New England and national newspapers this month regarding a leaked draft of the Inspector General's report concerning the biosolids program. According to the press, the EPA's Office of the Inspector General has been conducting an internal review of the agency's biosolids regulatory, oversight and enforcement program. The National Whistleblowers and Senator Grassley of Iowa expressed concern over the report and asked that the EPA take immediate action to address the concerns. EPA has not confirmed or denied that the draft report exists. Mike Cook, Director of the EPA Office of Wastewater Management, made reference to the NRC study being performed and stated that recommendations made by the NRC will be used to determine if regulatory changes are necessary. Monthly Update 6 March 2002 Biosolids Management Conference Papers Available (courtesy of National Biosolids Partnership) The new papers from the 16th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference that will be held on March 3-6, 2002 are now available for purchase through W EF's online library. To view the list of papers and abstracts, click on the link below: htto:/iwww.wef.org/applications/periodicals/results.cfm?searchmorith=March&searchyear-2002&pubtype= conf%20paper&keyword=biosolids. The hyperlink to the WEF On-Line Library and Bookstore for biosolids publications is also located on the NBP home page -htto://www.biosolids.org. Biosolids Exemplary Management Awards Program Announced (courtesy of National Biosolids Partnership) EPA's nomination guidance for its 2002 Biosolids Exemplary Management Awards Program is now available for all wastewater agencies. EPA encourages agencies to submit nominations. The awards program recognizes excellence in all areas of municipal biosolids management, including outstanding operating projects, research, technological advances, public acceptability, and risk and cost reduction activities. Application information includes the current categories and criteria to recognize a broad spectrum of programs. The national awards will be presented on September 30, 2002 at WEFTEC in Chicago, IL. For more information: EPA 2002 Biosolids Exemplary Management Awards Program Guidance: htto://biosolids.policv.net/relatives/22961.pdf Public Relations SCAP Public Relations Committee to Hold Second PR Workshop The SCAP Public Relations Committee will be scheduling its second workshop. The agenda for the workshop will include information on public education during a crisis, environmental educational materials, town hall meetings, the proposed Regulatory Academy, and "The Help Desk"where attendees can ask PR specialists from other agencies about how to handle their agency's unique concerns. A SCAP Afertf with information and directions will be distributed the first week of March. Infrastructure USEPA Opposes SRF Fundina Boost(wurtesy AwwA) The Bush administration this week signaled its opposition to the increased level of authorized funds for the Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Fund programs called for in the Senate's Water Investment Act. During the first day of testimony on the bipartisan measure before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, a USEPA spokesman expressed support for much of S 1961 but cautioned that "the increased spending in this bill is not consistent with" President Bush's priorities of defense and homeland security. EPA's Benjamin Grumbles, Assistant Administrator for Water, took issue wfth provisions that would extend assistance beyond communities identified as disadvantaged to any community that can use such funds to help disadvantaged individuals with rate subsidies. Grumbles said the bill must not allocate an additional 15 percent of SRF resources for such purposes but instead provide for such new use from the current 30 percent allocation for disadvantaged communities. Monthly Update 7 March 2002 He also expressed concern about the new conditions the bill would put on SRF loans for recipients to consult with land-use and watershed planning authorities, develop asset management plans, adopt rates that cover the full cost of service and consider nonstructural solutions such as consolidation and partnerships. While calling them "among the most important innovations in this legislation," Grumbles said Congress must ensure that the conditions don't"increase substantially the level of effort required to obtain an SRF loan. We must make sure that these conditions are framed in a workable way; that we provide a transition to the new conditions that equips applicants to address them in a timely way, that those who need special help in meeting the conditions can get it, and that small loans can continue to be provided without a level of analysis that is disproportionate to the investment sought." Non Sequitur Trust the computer industry to shorten "Year 2000"to Y2K. It was this kind of thinking that caused the problem in the first place. -Tom Kraemer a e MINUTES _ CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES MID-YEAR CONFERENCE Hilton Palm Springs,January 16— 19, 2002 Wednesday,January 16,2002 Delegates and Guests began checking-in at the conference registration table starting at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday morning,and the California Sanitation Risk Management Authority held a insurance-related workshop regarding Sewer Overflow Prevention and Claims Management from 9:30 to 3:00 p.m. The Executive Board met from 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. Thursday,January 17.2002 On Thursday morning, the Air, Land, and Water Issues Forums were held from 7:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. The Federal Liaison and Legislative Committee met from 11:15 am to 12:15 p.m. A luncheon for CASA Past Presidents was held at 12:15 p.m.,which was well attended. President Jean Marian called the General Session to order at 1:30 p.m. After welcoming delegates, President Marian announced that CASA has several new members: the cities of Burbank, Los Angeles, Sacramento and Vacaville and the Groveland Community Service District. The afternoon began with the presentation of the 2001 Achievement Award Winners for Public Service that featured Mt. View Sanitary District's Public Information Program, presented by District Manager David Contreras and Pollution Prevention Coordinator Leslie Engler, followed by Delta Diablo Sanitation District's Recycled Water Facilities project presented by Technical Services Manager Gregory Baatmp. The next program segment titled "Who Wants to be a Parts-Per-Trillionaire? — Ten Things You Should Know About Your Next Permit" included panel speakers Vicki Conway, Los Angeles County SanitationDistricts, Steve McDonald, Carollo Engineers and Monica Oakley, Larry Walker Associates. With help from delegates, panelist were asked to respond with a correct answer to obtain the most points to the multiple choice questions provided by moderator Roberta Larson, CASA. The conference program concluded with the President's Reception hosted by the Hilton Palm Springs Hotel. Friday,January 18,2002 Registration resumed at 8:00 am. on Friday, January 18, 2002. The morning schedule began at 7:30 a.m. with the Associates and the State Legislative Committee Meetings. Separate Directors and Managers meetings were held at 9:00 am., and the Attorneys Committee held a special meeting regarding False Claims Act Update from 10:00 until noon. The Directors Meeting program was titled "Tools for Successful Directors, " and highlighted aspects of managing public infrastructure assets and security concerns, TMDL challenges and Tri-TAC Diesel Survey The Tri-TAC Air Committee has distributed the diesel survey to water and sewer agencies through out the state in order to gather data regarding the impact of anticipated new requirements that the California Air Resources Board(CARS)is drafting. Bobbi Larson requested that member agencies that have not already done so complete and return the survey to the CASA office for Tri-TAC by the fast week in February. The annual meeting between POTWs and staff at CARB has been pushed back to April 2002 to allow time to gather and evaluate the results of the Tri-TAC diesel engine survey. Statute of Limitations for Capital Facility Fee Refund Claims In a major victory for wastewater and water agencies,the California Supreme Court upheld the application of a 120 day statute of limitations to actions against public agencies to recover alleged overpayments of capital facility fees. Attorney-Client Communications for Public Sector Lawyers The Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct(COPRAC)of the California State Bar adopted revisions to the rules governing attomey-client communications for public sector Lawyers. The revisions to Rule 3-600 are intended to allow public agency attorneys to disclose confidential communications where necessary,in the attorney's judgment,to prevent official misconduct. The new rule grew out of the controversy surrounding the conduct of former Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush and the disclosures made to the Legislature by one of the Insurance Department's attorneys. CASA's Attorneys Committee Chair Joan Arneson participated in a number of conference calls with other local government associations in an effort to narrow the scope of disclosures permitted by the rule, and the Attorneys Committee will present further information at the Spring Conference in May. Associates Chair Teresa Herrera reported that the Committee discussed an Associates Achievement Award which would recognize individuals and/or projects carried out by the Associates, and on behalf of the Committee she thanked the General Council for participating in the Associates Recognition Reception on Friday evening. Attorneys Chair Joan Arneson reported that the Committee had formed three sub-committees to address specific issues. These are: (1) proposed litigation regarding effluent limits; (2) urban runoff legislation;(3)pavement restoration legislation. Awards Chair Mike Cameron noted that the 2001 Achievement Award winners presentations were outstanding and informed the Council that this year's committee will look to modify the Award categories to help member agencies better understand the project categories when completing award application. Federal Liaison and Legislative Char Dave Williams reported that the Committee had prioritized three action items that are also legislative opportunities for CASA. They are(1)amend CWA to address water quality standards 4 and TMDL issues; (2) draft a white paper regarding Water Infrastructure Network grant funding that sets forth CASA's position; and (3) monitor anti-terrorism funding to assure wastewater needs are met. State Legislative Chair John Coleman reported that CASA will sponsor legislation on two issues: Mandatory Minimum Penalty Reform and Stays of Wastewater Discharge Permits. CASA is discussing legislation with potential authors, and the League of California Cities is expected to co-sponsor the Mandatory Penalty bill. The Committee has taken a 'watch' position on AB 1355 (Daucher): Local Government Finance and SB 710 (Alpert): Surface water quality monitoring, and a 'support' position on SB 529 (Sher): Mercury Hazardous waste. Mr. Coleman announced that the next State Legislative Meeting would be held on Friday, March 1,2002 at the Sacramento Airport Host Hotel at 9:30 am. Program Chair Charlotte Craven thanked the Associates for hosting a Reception on behalf of CASA, and reported that the Program Planning Meeting provided many ideas and topics for consideration for the Spring Conference Program. Charlotte Craven reported that a 'meet and greet' for Spouses/Guests will be scheduled for the Spring Conference, where Spouses/Guests interested in planning an informal activity for the day can get together. Mrs. Craven noted that the registration packets for the Spring Conference would be mailed by mid-February and would include information about local activities in the Squaw Valley area. Communications: Joyce Gwidt reported the Committee had a lunch meeting on Thursday, January 17, 2002, and that Duane Sandal, Communications Consultant for South Bayside System Authority is the Vice Chair for northern California and Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager for Orange County Sanitation District is the southern California Vice Chair. Conference Arrangements Char Joyce Gwidt reported the next conference dates and locations are: May 2—4, 2002 Resort at Squaw Creek, Squaw Valley August 7— 10. 2002 Hyatt Regency, Monterey January 15— 18, 2003 Hilton,Palm Springs Joyce Gwidt informed the Council that the President's Reception on Thursday evening was hosted by the Hilton Palm Springs,thanking CASA for continued support of their property. Mrs. Gwidt reported that the Spring Conference will include a dinner on Friday evening that will replace the President's Reception. 5 Joyce Crwidt also reported that the staff' at the CASA office have been providing hotel information further in advance of conferences so that members can plan their schedules earlier and secure a hotel room at the conference property. The CASA staff has a new service intended to ensure that as many members as possible can be accommodated at conference hotels. The office maintains a"Waiting List' for members that are not able to obtain a room reservation,and requests that before any member cancels a reservation at the hotel, they contact Debbie before contacting the hotel. She can arrange to re-assign the reservation to another CASA member on the waiting list. The objective is to assure that our members have accommodations at conference properties and obtain the special rate. Tri-TAC Chair Dave Williams reported that Tri-TAC is continuing to closely review the draft SSO Rule, Vacaville Permit Appeal, TMDL Program and county biosolids bans. Mr. Williams reminded the General Council that Tri-TAC is a technical advisory committee that concentrates on air, land and water issues related to the wastewater industry. President Marian thanked the delegates for attending the Mid-Year Conference and asked for a round of applause for the staffs efforts in producing an informative and successful conference. The meeting adjourned at 9:55 a.m. 6 AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 www.ocsd.com REGULAR MEETING March 27, 2002—7:00 p.m. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. All current agendas and meeting minutes are also available via Orange County Sanitation District's Internet site located at www.ocsd.com. Upon entering the District's web site, please navigate to the Board of Directors section. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 03127/02 Page 2 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the regular meeting held on February 27, 2002 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 02115/02 02/28/02 Totals $6.133,057.04 $4,246,859.77 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director or staff member, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Approve sewer easement agreement with Armstrong Ranch co-owners for the Armstrong Ranch development in the city of Santa Ana, at no cost to the district, in a form approved by General Counsel. b. Approve a second time extension of six months for Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. CP-0005, with the City of Huntington Beach. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 03/27/02 • Page 3 ` NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re March 27, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 27, 2002 to be filed. C. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the March 27, 2002 meeting. d. Verbal report by Chair of Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee re February 28, 2002 meeting. e. DRAFT URBAN RUNOFF AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 28, 2002 to be filed. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re the March 6, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 6, 2002 to be filed. C. (1)Authorize the General Manager to issue a request for proposals to qualified Ocean Monitoring Vessel Builders/Designers for Purchase of Ocean Monitoring Vessel, Specification No. V-2001-4313D; and (2)Authorize award of Purchase of Ocean Monitoring Vessel, Specification No. V-2001-438D, to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount not to exceed $1,300,000. d. Approve an agreement with M.J. Schiff and Associates, Inc.for the development of a Corrosion Management Program, Specification No. S-2002-8013D, providing for consulting services for a study of the District's two treatment plants, interplant pipelines, and collections systems, and to establish the requirements for the implementation of a comprehensive management program,for an amount not to exceed $145.000. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re the March 7, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 7, 2002 to be filed. 03/27/02 Page 4 ' i C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2,Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $175,769 and a time extension of 75 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to$1.119,077; and (2)Approve a budget amendment increase of $240,077 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, for a total project budget of$1.739,077. d. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Santa Ana River Interceptor Emergency Maintenance and Repairs, Contract No. 241-2, with Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc., for an Adjustment of Engineers Quantities, authorizing a deduction of$45,566, and a time extension of 45 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount to$404,434; and (2)Accept Santa Ana River Interceptor Emergency Maintenance and Repairs, Contract No. 241-2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. e. Accept Clarifiers P&Q Retaining Walls at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-60, with Castillo Western Industrial Constructors as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. f. Approve Memorandum of Understanding with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 241, establishing the terms of interagency coordination and interim reimbursement of expenses in connection with the protection, repairs, and maintenance of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, in a form approved by General Counsel. g. Approve a budget amendment of$247,610 for Interim Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J40-8, for a total project budget of$687,610; and (2)Approve Addendum No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee for additional engineering services for Interim Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J40-8, for an additional amount of$247,610, increasing the total amount not to exceed $597,340. h. (1) Approve a budget amendment of$139,170 for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J40-5, for a total project budget of$287,170; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates for additional environmental services for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J40-5, for an additional amount of$116,170, increasing the total amount not to exceed $194,000. i. Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$652,137 for a total amount not to exceed $1,619,118. 03/27/02 Page 5 j. (1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc. for Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49; Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50; Rehabilitation of the 140 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51; and Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of$495,247, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,645,048; (2)Approve a budget amendment increase of$1,322,000 for Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49,for a total project budget of$4,882,000; (3)Approve a budget amendment increase of $1,376,000 for Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50, for a total project budget of$5,775,000; (4)Approve a budget amendment increase of$1,877,000 for Rehabilitation of the W Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51,for a total project budget of$4,493,000; and (5)Approve a budget amendment increase of$1,748,000 for Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52,for a total project budget of $4,596,000. k. Approve a budget amendment increase of$2,118,000 for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22,for a total project budget of$7,016,000. I. Approve sole source Professional Services Agreement with Project Partners, Inc. to provide project engineering and project management consulting services for the District's Capital Improvement Program, for an estimated amount not to exceed $600,000 for the first year, with a 4% annual escalation fee,for a contract period effective March 27, 2002 through May 30, 2008. M. Approve Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc.for engineering services for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6, for an amount not to exceed $134,858, 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the March 13, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 13, 2002 to be fled. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2002. d. Reallocate $60,700 from the Central Training budget to the Tuition Reimbursement budget, increasing funding from$74,300 to$135,000 for Fiscal Year 01-02. 03/27/02 Page 6 15. Ratify use of General Managers emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for Emergency Repair of the No. 3 Central Generation Engine at Plant No. 1, for Purchase Order Nos. 31480 and 31939 issued to Cooper Energy Services for a combined total of$115,882.59, plus a 10% contingency for freight and any unforeseen work that may be required to complete the repair,for a total amount not to exceed $127,500.00. 16. Approve sewer service and connection agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District for connection of El Morro Elementary School that is currently located outside of the Orange County Sanitation District boundaries, in a form approved by General Counsel. 17. (1) Receive and file the OCSD Engineering report on Short-Tenn Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Evaluation dated March 20, 2002; (2) Receive and File report entitled, Analysis and Interpretation of Fall 1996 and Summer 1997 Water Quality Data, dated March 2002; and (3) Designate the use of chemical bleach and sodium bisulfate (dechlorination as a mitigation measure)as the Preferred Alternative for further detailed evaluation. 18. Award a sole source Professional Services Agreement to Black &Veatch Corporation for professional services for Short-Term Ouffall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87,for an amount not to exceed $447,920. 19. Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services budget allocation of $300,000, raising the total budgeted amount from $1,000,000 to $1,300,000 for the remainder of FY 01-02. 20. a. Verbal report by Vice Chair of Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee re March 25, 2002 meeting. b. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on February 11, 2002 and February 25, 2002 to be fled. C. (1)Approve Trojan Technologies as the ultraviolet light(UV)equipment manufacturer for the Groundwater Replenishment System based on lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of$20,253,000, and a total capital cost of $9,749,405, plus tax; (2)Approve a Pre-Selection Agreement between Orange County Water District(OCWD)and Trojan Technologies to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000 to be equally shared between OCWO and Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD); (3) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to the contract to install the demonstration UV system at a total cost of$849,842, plus tax; and (4) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV system at a total estimated capital cost of $8,649,563, plus tax. 03/27/02 Page 7 21. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board,the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a)purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re existing litigation, Tran, at al. v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. OOCC05306. (Government Code Section 54956.9) b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, 'If any, on matters considered in closed session 22. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 23. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 24. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for April 24, 2002. 25. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or 714 962-2411, ext. 7130 GAwp.dtMadmin\BSvkwnda\022702 draft agenda.dw 1, P Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2002 o Nay sAIniI oy z � r�cr'N HE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 t 02/27/02 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,was held on February 27, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Constance Underhill X Shirley McCracken,Vice Chair Tom Daly X Mike Alvarez Mark A. Murphy X Steve Anderson Steve Simonian X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X Shawn Boyd John Larson X Brian Brady Darryl Miller Debbie Cook x Connie Boardman X Laurann Cook Larry Crandall A Brian Donahue David Shawver A James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer John M. Gullixson X Michael Duvall X Alice B. Jempsa Arthur DeBolt X Tony Kawashima Tracy Worley A Beth Krom Greg Smith X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Pat McGuigan Alberta Christy X Roy Moore Marty Simonoff A Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Gary Adams X Jerry Sigler Jim Dow X Jim Silva Chuck Smith Paul Walker x Kenneth Blake STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Greg Mathews; Patrick Miles; Lisa Murphy; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Mike Moore; Juanita Skillman; Ingrid Hellebrand; Sonja Wassgren; Jeff Reed; Mark Esquer; Ryal Wheeler; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT:Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Don Hughes;David M. Hernandez; Irwin Haydock; Jan Vandersloot;Terry Lane; Larry Porter; Randy Fuhrman; Joey Racano; Dennis Baker; Doug Korthof; Don McGee; Eileen Murphy; Bill Butler; Dave Wielenga; Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 02/27/02 v Les Jones; Ann Norris; Kris Hardeman; Nariman Hadhoud; Keith Bohn; Bob Caustin; Larry Martinez; Greg Jewell; Paul Arms; Robert Feenstra 3. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Board of Supervisors James W. Silva Charles V. Smith PUBLIC COMMENTS The following persons spoke about ocean discharge issues and expressed their opposition to the waiver. Dennis Baker, Irwin Haydock; Paul Arms; Larry Porter,Jan Vandersloot; Don McGee; Greg Jewell; Eileen Murphy; Bob Caustin; Larry Martinez; Joey Raceno; Doug Korthoff. David Hernandez(former probationary employee)addressed the Directors regarding his employment termination from the District. Robert Feenstra, Executive Director of the Milk Producers Council, spoke to the Directors commending the District's biosolids management program and its positive effects on agriculture. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Peter Green for his contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District. REPORT OF THE CHAIR It was announced that Agenda Item No. 18(d)would need to be removed due to developments at the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee meeting. The item, approval of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement,would be considered at a later date. Chair Eckenrode then reported that Jeff Brown, Senior Engineer in the Air Quality and Special Projects Division, has been appointed to the Board of Trustees of the North Orange County Community College District, which is the third largest community college district in Cardomia. The calendar for the working committees was reviewed for the month of March. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 P' 02/27/02 REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson,General Manager, updated the Directors on what is happening on the federal level with regard to the Clean Water Act and 301(h)waiver permits. There are four 301(h) permit holders in the state of California: San Diego, Goleta, Morro Bay, and Orange County Sanitation District. Approximately 30 other permit holders are held throughout the United States including Honolulu, Juneau, the Puerto Rico area, the New England area, and Pacific Islands area. Mr. Anderson stated that Goleta and Honolulu have short outfalls about 1Y2 miles long, and they disinfect their effluent in order to protect beach uses. San Diego does not disinfect its effluent because of its long outfall and prevailing currents that keep their plume away from recreational waters. The permits for San Diego and Goleta are currently up for renewal in California. EPA has released the draft permit and a tentative affirmative decision granting San Diego a renewal. On March 13 the EPA and the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board will hold a joint hearing to adopt the final waiver permit for the city of San Diego. The EPA has also indicated that it will soon release the draft permit and tentative decision granting the city of Goleta a renewal of its 301(h) permit. Mr. Anderson then reported a need to add an item to the agenda which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)find that the matter arose subsequent to the posting of the Agenda, pursuant to authority of California Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); and (2)Add Item No. 21 to the Agenda, consideration of actions in connection with Short-Tenn Outfall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87. The General Manager then announced that the District's annual marine monitoring report is available by compact disc as well as paper format, and will also be available on the District's website soon. The report covers the monitoring data from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001. The 2001 summer studies off the Huntington Beach shoreline are not included in this report. An independent third-party panel of oceanographic experts is currently reviewing that information. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel, reported a need to add two items to the Closed Session, needing immediate action, which arose subsequent to the posting of the Agenda. General Counsel stated that these items could be added pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) upon a two-thirds vote of the Board. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to: (1) Find that the matters arose subsequent to the posting of the Agenda, pursuant to authority of California Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); and (2)Add two closed session items, as Item Nos. 19(a)(3)and (4), to the Agenda,to wit: Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 02/27/02 v County Superior Court Case No. 01CC11349 (Government Code Section 54956.9); and 3121 Michelson Drive LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 CC16520 (Government Code Section 54956.9). APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held February 27, 2002 be deemed approved, as mailed. Directors Ken Blake, Connie Boardman and Jim Silva abstained. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 01/15/02 10 /31/02 Totals $4,257,294.08 $15,001,835A9 Directors Shawn Boyd, Connie Boardman, Mark Leyes and Jim Silva abstained. Director Alice Jempsa abstained on Warrant No. 420D4. CONSENT CALENDAR 10. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Allen Brian requesting annexation of 1.343 acres to the District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Rangeview Drive in the unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-03, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District(Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-22-Brian Annexation). b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Summons and Complaint re Brown and Caldwell v. Orange County Sanitation District, at. al., Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. C-02-0033, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 100536-OB, issued to OCB Reprographics for Specification No. 9900-05,for an additional amount of$10,000,for a total amount not to exceed $110,000, providing for additional copying services. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 02/27/02 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES:A verbal report was presented by Director Eckenrode, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the February 27, 2002 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 23, 2002 to be filed. d. DRAFT URBAN RUNOFF AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES: The Chair ordered the draft Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 24, 2002 to be filed. Vice Chair Shirley McCracken presided over the remainder of the meeting as Chair Eckenrode had to excuse himself from the remainder of the meeting. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That Item No. 21 be considered out of order. 21. Short-Tenn Outfall Bacteria Reduction Proiect, Job No. J-87 Blake Anderson, General Manager, advised the Board of Directors that he was seeking approval to move forward with the construction and operation of disinfection facilities, with the goal of beginning disinfection within 90 days, subject to regulatory approval. Final budget approval would be requested after the costs are better known. Mr. Anderson and Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, gave a presentation on the need for the project. Disinfection kills bacteria and viruses. The process would meet beach water quality standards at the District's outfall, which is 4.2 miles offshore and in 200 feet of water. It would remove all doubt that the District's discharge is a source of bacteria on the beach. It was also reported that B bacteria exceedances occur at the beach this summer, the source would conclusively not be the District. Mr. Ghirelli reviewed the monitoring program the District has been undertaking since 1972. There is no scientific data available to date that would indicate our plume has caused bacterial contamination of the beach. However, monitoring data received on February 11 indicated the District's plume came very close to the Newport Beach pier,and bacteria levels were detected at or near the water surface at offshore stations in the Newport Canyon area. The occurrence of combined conditions at the same time during the monitoring on one day were unique: Santa Ana winds, deep currents moving the plume down coast,and 6' high tides that were moving the water towards shore. Initial chemical costs for disinfection were estimated at$10 million annually. A 15% bleach solution would most probably be used, which is much safer than liquid chlorine. The effluent would be closely monitored to insure that no chlorine residual was being produced that would be harmful to the sea life around the outfall. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 02/27/02 r The design, construction and operation of the facilities were estimated at$4 million. Long-term disinfection options were also briefly reviewed to include: non-chlorine-based chemical disinfection; ultraviolet light; microfiltretion; ozone. It will probably be a three to five year project before a long-tens system would be in place. Other issues discussed were (a)that disinfection and secondary treatment are separate issues; (b)that disinfection is targeted towards public health, bacteria and virus issues; and (c) secondary treatment is primarily an environmental issue with respect to biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids. It was then moved and seconded to approve authorization for the general Manager to negotiate and procure services, materials, goods and construction contracts required to implement Short- Term Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, at an undetermined cost to be subject to future ratification by the Board of Directors. Directors entered into a lengthy discussion and asked for clarification on estimated costs. Staff answered Directors' questions with regard to the process of disinfection; length of time process would be implemented; possibility of utilizing different chemicals; environmental review and process; improving water quality v. masking the problem; and disinfecting all wastewater. In response to some of the questions, Mr. Anderson reported that there is no direct evidence that the plume has reached the beach, but the data received on February 11 showed it to be closer to the surface than all prior readings. He noted that the bacteria level was only at 1% of the allowable state standard and thus posed no health hazard. He stated that by going forward with disinfection within 90 days would remove the District from any possibility whatsoever of being the responsible source this summer If there are any beach contamination issues. The following persons expressed their opposition of the disinfection project as proposed: Bob Caustin; Larry Porter,Joey Racano; Jan Vandersloot; Irwin Haydock; Paul Arms. A substitute motion was then made to continue consideration of authorization for the General Manager to negotiate and procure services, materials, goods and construction contracts required to implement Short-Term Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project, Job No. J-87, at an undetermined cost to be subject to future ratification by the Board of Directors,for 30 days. Following further discussion among the Directors,the substitute motion was amended. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and procure services related to Short-Tenn Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Project,Job No. J-87, in an amount not to exceed $200,000; provide a written report to the Board with more accurate estimates of costs for chemical and other disinfection alternatives; and include the 1996 20-Meter Study as a part of the written report for consideration and approval at the March 2002 meeting. Four votes in opposition to the substitute motion, as amended,were recorded. 13. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES:The Chair ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 6, 2002 to be filed. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 r' 02/27/02 C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Black and Veatch to provide engineering services for the design and installation support of Primary Clarifier Drive Replacement, Job No. P2-85, and Sludge Blanket Indicator Installation, Job No. SP-73, for an amount not to exceed $353,000. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Award a sole source contract with Hill Brothers Chemical Company for the Purchase of Magnesium Hydroxide Solution,for the period of March 18, 2002 through June 30, 2002, for an estimated amount not to exceed $95,000. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve additional funding for Cooperative Projects for FY2001-02 Phase II related to inflow and infiltration reduction in the amount of$3,480,206, increasing the total FY2001-02 funding amount from $2,555,213 to$6,035,419, as recommended by the Guidance Review Committee. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an increase in Cooperative Projects funding for sewer rehabilitation work with Sunset Beach Sanitary District, Contract No. CP-0118, in the amount of$21,920, increasing the project from$47,800 to an amount not to exceed $69,720. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Suspend the payment of $15,500 per month for an escrow extension into an account(ADAM431)with First American Title Company for lost opportunity compensation during the performance of due diligence on ICOR; and (2) Continue to conduct due diligence research of the ICOR site for the use as a biosolids composting option. 14. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES The Chair ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 7, 2002 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation,Job No. SP2000.41, with Olsson Construction Company as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services,Job No. SP19990022,with MVP Commercial, Inc., authorizing an addition of$7,215, increasing the total contract amount to$93,715;and (2)Accept Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services, Job No. SP19990022,as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with MVP Commercial, Inc. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 02/27/02 ° e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$190,000 to Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29,for a total budget of$472.200; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Junction Structure Upgrade, Job No. SP2000-29, with Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc.,authorizing an addition of$163,552.97 and a time extension of 44 days, increasing the total contract amount to$352,252.97. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 10 to the Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.,for Plant Reinvention/Automation Project,Job No. J-42, providing additional engineering services for reinvention idea benefit/cost evaluation for an additional amount of$106,218, increasing the total amount not to exceed $9,468,816. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 6 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities,Job No. P1-37, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$1,602,797 for a total amount not to exceed $5,205,904. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve plans and specifications for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84, on file at the office of the Board Secretary; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84. I. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve a sole source purchase order with OCB for reprographics services for Headworks Improvements at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-66, in the amount of$200,000. j. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of $2,480,000 for a total budget of$36,186,000 for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Jab No. 1-2-4, providing for additional design engineering services for an additional amount of$237,567, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,205,475. 15. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: The Chair ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 13, 2002 to be filed. c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 2002. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Mid-Year Financial Report for the period ending December 31, 2001. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 10 r 02/27/02 e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-04, Establishing a Business Mentor Program In Cooperation with the Orangewood Children's Foundation. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. 02-05, Adopting Policies and Procedures for Establishing the District's Written Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy, SAFETY-POL-101, and Subsequent Safety Policies Named Therein. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 02-06, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33,Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for immediate reinstatement of a Safety Supervisor classification at pay range El ($65,164-$92,192). 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to execute contract amendments to the existing "As Available Capacity and Energy Power Purchase Agreements"with Southern California Edison, as follows, providing for the method of payment by Edison of money owed to the District for power sold to Edison from November 2000 through March 2001,in a forth approved by General Counsel: • Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Implementing Section 4.4 of Amendment No. 1 to Power Purchase Agreement—QFID 2640(for Plant 1), including Conditional Release and Waiver • Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Implementing Section 4.4 of Amendment No. 1 to Power Purchase Agreement—QFID 1098 (for Plant 2), including Conditional Release and Waiver Director Shawn Boyd abstained. 17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve plans and specifications for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Ouffalls,Job No. J-39,on file at the office of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file Bid Tabulation and Recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to Connolly-Pacific Company for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39, for an amount not to exceed $4,873,000. 18. DRAFT JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES: The Chair ordered the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on January 14, 2002 and January 28, 2002 to be filed. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 11 02/27/02 r C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement between Orange County Water District and Montgomery Watson Harza to provide construction management services for four years for the Groundwater Replenishment System,Job No. J-36,for a total amount not to exceed$10,993,038, with Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District paying equal shares not to exceed $5,496,519. Director Brian Brady opposed. Director Steve Anderson abstained. d. Item removed. 19. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 9:29 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, to discuss Agenda Item Nos. 19(a)(1), (2), (3)and (4). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item Nos. 19(a)(1) and (3). A report of the action taken re Agenda Item No. 19(a)(2)will be reported at the time the approved action becomes final. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:46 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. It was moved, seconded and unanimously carried to(1)receive and file Summons and Petition for Writ of Mandate, 3121 Michelson Drive LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 01 CC16520; and (2)authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. ADJOURNMENT: The Vice Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:46 p.m. 1 in Secretarylef the Boarcr#f Directors of Orange County Sanitation District G1wp.dt Xadminzsxminut ;5 012302 Graft mina a .dw Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to 01/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 41176 Air Products&Chemicals $ 25,039.17 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 41177 Blue Cross of California 222,523.23 Medical Insurance Premium 41178 Brown&Caldwell 54,627.01 Engineering Services P2.35.3,J-25.6&241 41179 Cathcart Garcia van Langan Engineers 40,043.69 Engineering Services P2-82 41180 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 159,517.14 (8)Servers,(2)PCs,Hardware/Soilware 41181 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 72,356.24 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 41182 Lee&Ra,Inc. 41.037.37 Engineering Services 549.5-50,5-51 &5-52 41183 Orange County Water Dislricl 65,495.70 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 41184 Painewebber Incorporated 39,977.68 COP Remarketing Agreement 41185 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. 123.221.85 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 41186 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 97.436.69 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 41187 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 107,015.78 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 411B8 The Lewis Group 26,622.50 Consulting Service-ProjW Management Process 41189 Tule RanchrMagan Famts 102,870.19 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 41190 Woodruff,Spredlin&Smart 112,864.55 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 41191 The Yakima Company 60,363.79 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 41192 Ken Thompson,Inc. 600,495.00 Construction 5-46 41193 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 55,864.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Pit. 1 m 41194 UManlec Engineering,Inc. 52,830.00 Construcllon J-66 fir( 41195 A.B.1,0VA.P.Attorney Service 233.62 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs = 41196 Acoustical Material Services 644.20 Ceiling Tile W 41197 Action Instruments r/o Goldin.State Did. 1.514.61 Instrument Pens&Supplies 41198 Great Amedcsn Printing Co. 2,032.82 Paper 41199 Airborne Express 83.35 Air Freight D 41200 Airlifts Safety 1,758.61 Safety Supplies 41201 Alden's Carpet&Drapes 1,194.12 Floor Tile Replacement 41202 Alta-Robbins,Inc. 99.14 Instrument Supplies 41203 Artistic Blinds 1,641.88 Min[Blinds&Installation 412D4 ADS Hydraulics,Inc. 1,952.41 (3)Pumps,Repairs&Testing 412D5 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,017.09 Long Distance Telephone Service 41206 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 16.36 Telephone Service 41207 Basic Chemical Solutions 331.12 Chemicals 41208 Battery Specialties 1,207.23 Batteries 41209 Beckman Coulter,Inc. 123.41 Lab Parts&Supplies 41210 BloVir Laboratories 3,561.00 Lab Services 41211 Smnanskl&Co., Inc. 1.500.00 Appraisal Services 41212 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 1.004.05 Electrical Pans&Supplies 41213 Brian A. Ewald,M.D.,Inc. 5,675.00 Medical Services-Claim of Tran ve.Kovacs 41214 Bush&Associates,Inc. 3,142.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 41215 Cambridge Integrated Services Group,Inc. 2.083.33 Professional Services-Workers Compensation Claims 41216 Cameron Welding Supply 1,345.73 Welding&Mechanical Pane&Supplies 41217 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 5.593.00 Engineering Services J-40-3,7-36.7-39&7.41 41218 Carollo Engineers 7,444.43 Professional Services P2-60 41219 Century Business Solutions, Inc. 8,150.11 Office Supplies 41220 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1.279.23 Copier Lease Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to 01/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 41221 Coast Fire Equipment 1,501.89 (20)Fire Extinguishers 41222 Coast Rubber Stamp Mfg. 25.80 Stationery&Office Supplies 41223 Coastline Equipment 930.77 Wheel Loader Repairs 41224 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3.875.47 Elemncal Pans&Supplies 41225 Consolidated Plastics Company, 115.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41225 Cornerstone Management Consulting 750.00 Consulting Services-Management Training 41227 Corporate Express Imaging 870.75 Computer Supplies 41228 Corporate Express 915.01 Office Supplies 41229 County Wholesale Electric Go, 849.09 Electrical Pads&Supplies 41230 Crane America Services.Inc. 291.13 Crane Services 41231 Cylec Industries 20.182.69 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 41232 CWEA Membership 140.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 41233 Del Mar Analytical 234.00 Biosolids Analysis 41234 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 56.89 Paint Supplies 41235 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 462.90 Electrical Supplies 41236 Elliott Bay Design Group 10.140.57 Professional Services-Preliminary Design&Cost Analysis for Monitoring Vessel 41237 Enchanter.Inc. 1,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 41238 Environmental Resource Association 1,328.70 Lab Parts&Supplies 41239 EPA,Inc. 2,886.00 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 41240 FedFx Corporation 41.62 Air Freight 41241 Filarsky&Watt,L.L.P. 997.50 Professional Services-SPMT Negotiations 41242 First American Real Estate Solutions 22205 Orange County Property Information 41243 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 2,996.56 Lab Pans&Supplies 41244 Flo-Systems,Inc. 210.99 Pump Supplies 41245 Fountain Valley Camera 154.72 Photo Supplies 41246 Fountain Valley Chevron Auto Wash 345.89 Truck Wash Tckets 41247 Frys Electronics 205.15 Computer Supplies 41248 General Petroleum 8,199.95 Unteaded Gasoline 41249 George Yardley Go. 534.28 Lab Supplies 41250 GeoBrey Gibbs 1.123-03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 41251 Gold Systems, Inc. 14.596.25 Professional Services-Data Migration&STORET Interface Application 41252 Goldemvesl Window Service 22D.00 Professional Cleaning Services 41253 Governing Magazine 15.00 Subscription Postage 41254 W W Grainger,Inc. 309.21 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41255 Graphic Distributors 546.53 Photographic Supplies 41256 Grating Pacific.Inc. 2,538.04 Fiberglass Grating 41257 Graybar 351.79 Electrical Supplies 41258 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 124.36 Janitorial Supplies 41259 GRC Electronics 530.38 Repair of VCR/Dubbing Equipment 41260 Hach Company 2,893.42 Lab Supplies 41261 Harold Primrose Ice 55.50 Ice For Samples 41262 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 176.57 Engine Generator Control Supplies 41263 Hilo,Inc. 1.618.70 Tools 41264 The Holman Group 715.68 Employee Assistance Program Premium 41265 Home Depot 89.01 Small Hardware 41266 Hopkins Technical Products 06.45 Instrument Parts&Supplies Page 2 of 7 Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to 01/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 41267 Hub Auto Supply 21.54 Automotive Parts&Supplies 41268 City of Huntington Beach 18,841.40 Water Use 41269 HPC Technologies 1,095.00 O&M Training Registration 41270 Imaging Plus, Inc. 1,543.07 Printing Service 41271 Industrial Distribution Group 4,614.71 Tools&Mechanical Supplies 41272 Industrial Metal Supply 2,809.90 Metal 41273 Infinity Technology USA 499.92 Computer Supplies 41274 Inside EPA 300.00 Subscription 41275 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1.81308 Instrument Supplies 41276 Ionics Instrument Business Group 421.76 Lab Pans&Supplies 41277 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 215.00 Oesla Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 41278 IABC 227.00 Membership-International Association of Business Go. 41279 IDMS: Imaging Document Mgmt. Solutions 10,991.00 Professional Services J-25-1 41280 ISA 120.00 Membership 41281 J&L Industrial Supply 439.89 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 41292 JE Melnhad Associates 835.75 Lab Pans&Supplies 41283 J.D.Edwards 500.00 Accounting Training Registration 41284 Jay's Catering 40.74 Meeting Expenses 41285 Joe Rhodes Maintenance Services, Inc. 402.49 Software Maintenance 41286 Johnstone Supply 146.68 Electrical Supplies 41287 JPR Systems,Inc. 97.22 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 41288 Karen Monaco&Associates 6.767.50 FIS Support Services 41289 Kelly Lasslg or Doris Scobie 1,147.94 Vehicle Damage Claim Settlement 41290 Knott Laboratory,Inc. 2.682.60 Lab Services-Claim of Than vs.Kovacs 41291 David Koren 703,55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 41292 Lab Safely Supply,Inc. 43.77 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 41293 La Motte Chemical Products 153.87 Lab Parts&Supplies 4/294 Leadership Directories 308.75 Subscription 41295 Lexis-Neds 232.76 Books&Publications 41296 Unjer Company c/o Gerald Jones 4,328.65 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 41297 Lustre-Cal 554.70 OCSD Decals for Waslehauier Trucks 41298 Lutheran High School 2.244,00 Reconciliation User Fee Program 41299 Maintenance Technology Corp. 319.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41300 Mamco International 1,419.00 Janitorial Supplies 41301 MarVac Electronics 67.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41302 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 347.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41303 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 2,646.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41304 Medlin Controls Co. 3,224.64 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41305 Mid-West Associates 15,257.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41306 Mission Uniform Service 2.815.36 Uniform Rentals 41307 Moody's Investors Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 41308 MCR Technologies,Inc. 608.47 (30)Strip Charts 41309 National Institute of Bids.&Technology 1,503.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 41310 Neal Supply Co. 239.99 Plumbing Supplies 41311 NetVersant of Silicone Valley 5.542.30 Security System Maintenance 41312 Newark Electronics 737.62 Electrical Pans&Supplies Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 01/01102 to 01/15/02 Warrant No. Vend" Amount Description 41313 City of Newport Beach 91.18 Water Use 41314 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 5,619.66 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 41315 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1,325.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 41316 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service 41317 NCG Porter Novelli 8.119.34 Professional Services-Public Relations 41318 O.C.Windustrial Co. 401.15 Plumbing&Mechanical Pans&Supplies 41319 Ocean Blue Environmental Services 6.526.00 Sewer Spill Clean-up-Biller Point Pump Station 41320 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1.483.61 Office Supplies 41321 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 1.470.79 Electrical Pans&Supplies 41322 Orange County Hose Company 538.58 Hose 41323 Orange County Pump Co. 219.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41324 Orange County Wlmvater Works 12.97 Plumbing Supplies 41325 Orangewood Business Center, Inc. 11,209.34 Reconciliation User Fee Program 41326 Oxygen Service Company 79.01 Specialty Gases 41327 OCB Reprographics 68.45 Printing Service-MO 1126100 41328 Pacific Bell 2523 Telephone Services 41329 Pacific Bell Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 41330 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1.613.39 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 41331 Danny Parker 1.123.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 41332 Peeress Wiping Materials Co. 720.25 Janitorial Supplies 41333 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 3,448.42 Lab Parts&Supplies 41334 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 10,490.44 Sodium Hypochlonte 41335 Polydyne,Inc. 15,875.68 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 41336 Hach rM Portion Industries 425.60 Lab Parts&Supplies 41337 Port Supply 35.75 Lab Parts&Supplies 41338 Posh Parties&Special Events 135.52 Meeting Supplies 41339 Pra-Paid Legal Services.Inc. 523.25 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 41340 Process Equipment Company 1.086.92 Pump Supplies 41341 Pumping Solutions.Inc. 3,273.38 (10)Pumps 41342 PRIMA: Public Risk Management Assoc. 295.00 Membership 41343 COS,L.L.C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service 41344 Realtime Systems Corporation 21.375.00 Software Maintenance 41345 Regents of Univ.of California 2,572-66 Professional Services J-85 41346 Reliastar 8.485.00 Employee Medical Health Premium 41347 Reliestar Bankers Security Life Ins. 8,439.78 Life Insurance Premium 41348 Royce Multimedia,Inc. 1.502.25 video Services 41349 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 6D8.77 Pump Supplies 41350 RS Hughes Co,Inc. 11228 Paint Supplies 41351 S&J Supply CD Inc 681.55 Plumbing Supplies 41352 Schwing America.Inc. 548.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41353 Scott Specialty Gases.Inc. 1,242.14 Lab Parts&Supplies 41354 Sears Industrial Sales 88.37 Mechanical Parts It Supplies 41355 Shamrock Supply Go.,Inc. 1.949.00 Pump Supplies 41356 Supelco,Inc. 414.91 Lab Parts&Supplies 41357 Smarden Supply Company/Orange Coast 2.929.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41358 So.Cal.Gas Company 640.00 Natural Gas Page 4 of 7 a Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to 01/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 41359 SoftGtoice 7,901,25 Software 41360 Southern California Edison 22,342.85 Power 41361 State Street Bank and Trust Co.of Ca. 4,747.60 COP Trustee Services 41362 Rudolph Stewart 703.55 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 41363 SUN-SRI 170.75 Lab Pads&Supplies 41364 Sunset Ford 181.46 Vehicle Supplies 41365 Sunset Industrial Pads 2.158.09 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 41366 Super Chem Corporation 486.50 Chemicals 41367 SAW PA 3.000.00 Professional Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 41368 Tasew.Inc. 1.644.75 Valves 41369 Taylor-Dunn 86.20 Electric Can Parts 41370 Textile Engineering Associates 1.128.75 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 41371 Thermo Finnigan,L.L.C. 1,588.25 Lab Pads&Supplies 41372 ThermoGestec.Inc. 515.20 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41373 Thompson Industrial Supply.Inc. 704.20 Mechanical Supplies 41374 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 14.92 Locks&Keys 41375 Tran Consulting Engineers 8.981.00 Engineering Services J-66&7-21 41376 Tropical Plaza Nursery.Inc. 1,064.82 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5A 1-94 41377 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 87.09 Truck Supplies 41378 Teksyslems 4,781.00 Temporary Employment Services 41379 U.S.Geological Survey 2,300.00 Ocean Monitoring Program J-85 41380 United Parcel Service 44.08 Parcel Services 41381 Unocal 76 184.44 Fuel for Vehicles 41382 Vallen Safety Supply Company 90.78 Safety Supplies 41383 Valley Cities Supply Company 72.90 Plumbing Supplies 41384 Valley Dehod Diesel Allison 112.54 Mechanical Supplies 41385 Vented 5.000.00 Software Maintenance 41386 Verizon California 798.30 Telephone Services 41387 Veme's Plumbing 50.00 Testing It Certification for all Backflow Devices Pits. 1 2 and Pump Stations 41308 Village Nurserles 327.01 Landscaping Supplies 41389 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 23.559.87 Hydrogen Peroxide Specifics lion No:C-044 41390 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 1.456.48 Lab Parts&Supplies 41391 The Wackenhut Corporation 4.953.92 Security Guards 41392 Water Environment Federation 72.75 Publication 41393 WaterReuse Association 2.750.00 Membership 41394 Waxle Sanitary Supply 323.88 Janitorial Supplies 41395 Westbay Solutions Group 1,650.00 Information Technology Training Registration 41390 Xerox Corporation 6,927.84 Copier&Fax Leases 41397 Yokogawa Corp.of America 874.00 Charts 41398 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 18,340.20 Construction 241-2 41399 Deon M.Carrico 260.58 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 41400 Larry Gibson 314.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 41401 James D. Herberg 468.55 MeelingRmining Expense Reimbursement 41402 Matthew P.Smith 550.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 41403 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fee 41404 NAFA,Inc. 35.00 O&M Meeting Registration Page 5 of 7 Claim Paid From O1101/02 to 01/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 41405 NAFA,Inc. 35.00 0&M Meeting Registration 41406 Orange County Sanitation District 1,277.34 Petty Cash Reimb. 41407 24 Hour Fitness 1.876.00 Corporate Membership 41408 U.S Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 41409 Orange County Sanitation District 474,540.65 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 41410 U.S.Peroxide 45,249.92 Professional Services-Collection System Odor&Corrosion Control Study&Chemicals 41411 American Airlines 1,485.75 Travel Services 41412 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 67.81 Telephone Service 41413 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 4,595.36 Cellular Telephone Service 41414 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 41415 Center for Creative Growth 1,250.00 Professional Services-Management Coaching 41416 Court Order 160.00 Wage Garnishment 41417 CASA 300.00 Environmental Compliance&Monitoring Meeting Registration 41418 CCP Industries 11,009.56 Janitorial Supplies 41410 CSMFO 100.00 Accounflng Meeting Registration 41420 Dawson Company 6,845.82 Hot Water Loop Expansion Tank&Mechanical Pans 41421 Document Control Solutions.Inc. 77.37 Stationery&Office Supplies 41422 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 41423 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 778.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41424 Flat and Vertical.Inc. 336.00 Concrete Culling 41425 Franklin Covey 563.OD Office Supplies 41425 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Gamishmenl 41427 FLW,Inc. 2,915.76 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 41428 G.F.O.A. 275.00 Finance Meeting Registration 41429 HPC Technologies 1,095.00 0&M Training Registration 41430 In0. Union of Oper.Erg.AFL-CIO Local 501 2,563.53 Dual Deduction 41431 IDM Controls,Inc. 5,675.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41432 Kelly Pipe Co.,L.L.C. 2,389.60 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 41433 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1,546.45 Mechanical Supplies 41434 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 290.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41435 Gy of Newport Beach 23.24 Water Use 41436 Orange County Marshal 100.00 Wage Garnishment 41437 Orange Valve&Figirg Company 696.71 Fittings 41438 OCFA 448.87 Dues Deduction 41439 Pacific Mechanical Supply 370.19 Plumbing Supplies 41440 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 41441 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 41442 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction 41443 Projects Partners 8,338.04 Temporary Employment Services 41444 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 604.42 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 41445 Scott Specialty Gases.Inc. 253.09 Lab Pans&Supplies 41446 Slemon,Larsen&Marsh 110.00 Administration Meeting Registration 41447 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 41448 So.Cal.Gas Company 2.497.59 Natural Gas 41449 Southern California Water 69.07 Water Use 41450 Summit Steel 259.44 Metal Page 6 of 7 Claims Paid From 01/01/02 to 01/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 41451 U.S.Composting Council 250.00 Membership 41452 United Stales Postal Service 87.50 P.O.Bon Fee 41453 United Way 305.00 Employee Contribullons 41454 Verizon California 1,250.85 Telephone Services 41455 Tad E.Haynes 553.64 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 41456 Vahn Phonsid 321.39 Mestingri-raining Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants If 3,163,778.00 Payroll Disbursements 25486-25621 Employee Paychecks $ 173.411.16 Biweekly Payroll 01/09/02 25622-25622 Interim Paycheck 188.18 Adjustment 68595-691348 Direct Deposit Statements 755,762.29 Biweekly Payroll 01/09/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 929.361.63 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 116,360.28 Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 CertBicales of Participation Chase Bank of Texas 47,794A7 December Interest Payment on Sense 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Who Transfer Payments $ 164.154.45 Total Claims Paid 01/01/02-01115102 $ 4,257,294.08 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From O1116102 to 01/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 41457 American Express 29,234.96 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 41458 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 99,368.89 Professional Services J-73-2 41459 AKM Consulting Engineers 37.460.47 Professional Services 7-36,7-39&741 41460 ASAP Software Express 137,094.76 Software Maintenance Agreement-650 Computers 41461 Black&Veatch Corporation 187,467.39 Engineering Services P7-46-2,P1-76,Pl-76&J-70 41462 Brown&Caldwell 44,166.24 Engineering Services 1-98 41463 Carollo Engineers 378,228.90 Professional Services P2-66&Microfiliration Demonstration Study 41464 Delta Dental 51,813.02 Dental Insurance Plan 41465 Harbour Engineering Group 32.364.00 (4)impellers&Pump Pans&Supplies 41466 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 34.055.16 Medical Insurance Premium 41467 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 106,374.11 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 4146E Ughlin do Leonard Engineered Products 39,128.93 Mechanical Repairs-Gear Aerators 41469 Mike Pdich&Sons 224,218.78 Cart.-Force Main Repairs,Pothding,Cleaning&Video Insp.at Bitter Pump Sta. 41470 Orange County Water District 1,538,249.50 Joint GWRS Project-J-36 41471 Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. 140,889.13 Engineering Services J-42&2-41 41472 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 30,165.40 Sodium Hypochlorile m 41473 Polydyne,Inc. 33,409.54 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 )( 41474 Projects Partners 33,085-04 Temporary Employment Services 41475 Rain for Rent 25.484.66 (1)Trailer Mounted Diesel Pump 41476 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 74.191.76 Ocean Monitoring J-85 41477 Sopp Chevrolet 25.210.80 (1)2002 Chevy Silverado 41478 Tule RanchrMagan Fames 99,23226 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 41479 U.S.Geological Survey 181,606.87 Ocean Monitoring Program J-85.HB III W 414W U.S.Peroxide 88.016.00 Prof.Services&Chemical-Coll.Sys.Odor&Corrosion Control Phase II 41,181 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 30,997.77 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No.C-044 41482 Waste Markets Corp. 57.978.40 Malnt.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Materials Removal 41403 The Yakima Company 41,393.54 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 41484 Ark Construction Company 10D,800.0D Construction Pl-62 41485 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,432,074.88 Combuc8un J-71-1,J-71-2,PI-37&P2.39 41486 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 49.615.13 Construction Pl-46-2&J-53 41407 Southern Contracting Company 59,912.00 Construction J-33-1-A 41488 Orange County Sanitation District 26,943A3 Workees Comp Reimb. 41489 A.B.L/V.I.P.Attorney Service 515.17 Legal Services-Tran vs.Kovacs 41490 Able Scale Repair 550.00 Loading Scales Quarterly Inspection 41491 Action Instruments do Goldn State Crud 1,754.30 Instrument Parts&Supplies 41492 Advanced Power&Controls,L.L.C. 10,110.27 Electdcal Control Panels for(2)Pumps @ Pit.2 Truck Loading Facilities 41493 Air Products&Chemicals 332.36 Lab Pans&Supplies 41494 Airborne Express 66.58 Air Freight 41495 Airgas Safety 671.73 Safety Supplies 41496 Alden's Carpel&Drapes 160.46 Floor Tile Replacement 41497 Afta-Robbins,Inc. 352.72 Instrument Supplies 41498 American Public Works Association 167.00 Publication 41499 American Training Resources, Inc. 1,171.75 Safety Videos 41500 Appleone Employment Service 8.151.32 Temporary Employment Services 41501 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs, Inc. 1,800.00 Toxicity Testing Page i of 13 Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02 Warrant Na Vendor Amount Description 41502 Pagenst 2,634.84 Pagers,Service&Airtime 41503 ACS Hydraulics.Inc. 4,337.96 Pump Repairs&Testing 41504 AMSA 1.325.00 O&M Meeting Registration 41505 ASF User Services Office 1.800.00 Satellite Maps 41506 American Telephone and Telegraph Corp. 76.27 Telephone Service 41507 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 63.15 Cellular Telephone Service 41508 AWSI 233.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 41509 SioNleneux Vilek,Inc. 894.56 Lab Parts&Supplies 41510 Bloomberg L.P. 4,472.91 Financial Monitoring MO4-14-93 41511 Borden Decal Company 861.61 Employee Hang Tag Parking Permits 41512 Boyle Engineering Corporation 1,329.76 Professional Services 2-31 41513 Bush&Associates,Inc. 5,566.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 41514 Business Objects Amedcas 8,062.50 Software Maintenance-Business Objects 41515 SEX Incorporated 90.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41516 California Auto Collision 494.53 Track Repair 41517 Can Warren&Co. 114.91 Insurance Claims Administrator 41518 Carleton Engineers&Consultants,Inc. 150.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality Management 41519 Cayman Chemical Company 286.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 41520 Clayton Controls 53.98 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 41521 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3.614.78 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41522 Conveyor Components Co. 304.74 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41523 Cooper Energy Services 307.44 Engine Supplies 41524 Core Laboratodes,Inc. 50D.00 Lab Analyses 41525 CoreMedia 510.00 Safety Video 415M Corporate Express 1.386.95 Office Supplies 41527 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 13,639.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 41528 Cost Containment Solutions 1,007.82 Workers Comp.Services 41529 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1.358.85 Maint.Agreement -Repairslinstallation of Base, Handheld&Vehicle Radios 41530 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,151.79 Instrument Pants&Supplies 41531 Crane America Services,Inc. 96ST2 Repairs&Maintenance Service 41532 Culligan of Orange County 35.00 Service Agreement-Can.Gen.Water Softener Systems 41533 Cytec Industries 319.50 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798-18 41534 CASA 11,000.00 Membership 41535 CASA 600.00 Admin.Meeting Registration 41536 CELSOC 50.64 Publications 41537 CR&R, Inc. 4,704.32 Container Rentals 41538 CWEA Membership 140.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 41539 DTI 735.00 Chemicals 41540 Del Mar Analytical 280.00 Blosolids Analysis 41541 DIRECTV 335.00 Subscription 41542 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 3,122.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41543 Electra-Bond,Inc. 7.483.62 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 41544 Elliott Say Design Group 10,140.57 Professional Services-Preliminary Design&Cost Analysis for Monitoring Vessel 41545 Enchanter,Inc. 1,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 41546 Environmental Science Associates 22,624.11 Professional Services J-40-5 41547 Equipco Sales&Service 1,883.90 Iist.Parts,Supplies&Repairs Page 2 of 13 - Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02 Wanted No. Vendor Amount Description 41548 ENS Resources,Inc. 4,752.75 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 41549 FadEx Corporation 94.12 Air Freight 41550 Fflaisky&Watt,L.L.P. 1.330.00 Professional Services,SPMT Negotiations 41551 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,134.23 Lab Parts&Supplies 41552 Fountain Valley Camera 16.32 Photo Supplies 41553 Fountain Valley Chevron Argo Wash 341.99 Truck Wash Tickets 41654 Bloomberg L.P. 816,09 Financing Monitoring MO 4-14-93 41555 Franklin Covey Co. 301.40 Office Supplies 41556 Frazee Paint and Wallcoverirg 242.44 Paint Supplies 41557 Frederick Pump&Engineering 7.77 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 41558 Frys Electronics 702.34 Computer Supplies 41559 FLW,Inc. 1,669.89 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance 41560 FST Sand and Gravel.Inc. 420.63 Maintenance Materials 41561 Garahl Lumber Company 47.83 Lumber/Hardware 41562 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. 940.63 Belt Filler Press Supplies 41563 Golden Bell Products 12.540.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coating of Manholes 41564 Goldenwest Window Service 2A62.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.a990015 41565 Grafix Training&Consulting 3,893.00 Information Technology Training Registration 41566 W W Grainger,Inc. 1.046.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41567 Graybar 1,182.42 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41568 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 399.90 Janitorial Supplies 41569 American Sigma,Inc. 3,019.24 Ins.Parts&Supplies 41570 Harold Primmse Ice 55.50 Ice For Samples 41571 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 23.00 Meeting Expenses 41572 Hill Brothers 4,876.71 Chemicals 41573 Hill.Inc. 706.81 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41574 Home Depot 76.93 Smell Hardware 41575 How Magazine 74.96 Subscription 41576 Hub Auto Supply 123.37 Truck Parts 41577 Imaging Express 68.21 Printer Maintenance 41578 Industrial Distribution Group 328.52 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41579 Industrial Metal Supply 2,27324 Metal 415W Information Resources 250.00 Human Resources Service 41581 Interstate Battery Systems 63.37 Batteries 41582 Invensys Systems,Inc. 1,335.37 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41583 Irvine Rench Water District 32.54 Water Use 41564 J&B Auto Pads 355.19 Auto Parts&Supplies 41585 J&L Industrial Supply 402.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41586 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 5.249.59 Instrument Parts&Supplies 41587 J.D.Edwards 3,825.00 On-Site Training 41588 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 3.527.77 Construction-Installation&Maint.of Gas Flaps for Collection System 41589 Jana Contracting Corp 7,958.27 Construction-Sewer Lateral Repairs at Crawford Canyon 41590 Jays Calering 527.66 Meeting Expenses 41591 Jensen Instrument Co. 779.97 Instrument Parts&Supplies 41592 Johnstone Supply 12.29 Electrical Supplies 41593 Karen Monaco&Associates 5,896.25 FIS Support Services Page 3 of 13 Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Ameum Description 41594 Kelly Paper 115.09 Paper 41595 Kensington Electronics 975.21 Electrical Supplies 41596 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation 5.227.48 (2)Workstations 41597 Knowledge Point 2,418.75 Software Maim. 415M Lab Support 2,839.50 Temporary Employment Services 41599 Law/Crandall 2,631.00 Professional Services-Soil Testing P-182 41OW La Molls Chemical Products 220.49 Chemicals 41WI Lee 3 Ro,Inc. 11.976.86 Engineering Services-Pit.2,Power Bldg,2.Cable Tray Improvements 41602 Lessons in Leadership 1.769.45 Compliance and Information Technology Meeting 8 Training Registration 41603 Lessons In Leadership 49.95 Compliance Training Supplies 41604 Unjer Company rlc Gerald Jones 4.244.95 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 41605 Long Beach Line-X 1,450.78 Truck Liner and Fiberglass Truck Lid 41606 Luccfs 75.00 Meeting Expense 41607 Manor,Phelps 8 Phillips.L.L.P. 5.000.00 Strategic Planning 8 Advocacy 41608 MarVac Electronics 66.46 Electrical Parts 6 Supplies 41609 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 178.91 Tools 41610 Mec Analytical System 8.975.00 Professional SeMces-Toxicity Analysis 41611 Mechanical Seal Repair,Inc. 2,135.84 Mechanical Pans 6 Supplies 41612 Medlin Controls Co. 484.90 Instrument Supplies 41613 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 3,760.00 Mechanical Pars 5 Supplies 41614 Mission Uniform Service 5.801.27 Uniform Rentals 41615 MotoPhoto 71A7 Photographic Services 41616 MGD Technologies,Inc. 7.100.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 41617 National Micrewmp Services 1.212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 41618 Neal Supply Co. 1.063.82 Plumbing Supplies 41619 NeNersent of Southern California 10,708.46 Human Resources Security System Improvements 41620 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 6.213.82 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 41621 Ninyo 8 Moore Corporate Accounting 1.730.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO rr2498 41622 Northern Tool 8 Equipment Company,Inc. 7,720.27 (3)Honda Generators 41623 O.C.Windustrial Co. 1,650.90 Plumbing Parts 8 Supplies 41624 Once Depot Business Services Div. 892.47 Office Supplies 41M Omnimark Instrument Corp. 6.713.38 Instrument-Moisture Analyzer 41626 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 2.114.52 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 41627 Orange County Hose Company 143.27 Hose Supplies 8 Repairs 41628 Ow Door Closer Services 448.82 Door Maintenance 41629 Oxygen Service Company 2,971.35 Specialty Gases 41630 OCB Reprographics 3.501.54 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 41631 OCE-USA, Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Maim. 41632 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 75.59 AJC Filters 41633 Pacific Bell 1,132.89 Telephone Services 41634 Pacific Ball Internet Services 324.00 Internet Service 41635 Pack Mechanical Supply 3,493.15 Plumbing Supplies 41636 Paris Unlimited 89.47 Truck Supplies 41637 Pave West 2.612.00 Construction-Repairs to Asphalt at Fac.Mainl Shops A 8 B 41638 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 846.57 Lab Instrument Repair 41639 Practitioners Publishing 188.13 Publications Page 4 of 13 Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 41640 Primary Source 2,321.35 Office Furniture 41641 Hoffman Southwest Corporation 15,734.91 Sewer Line Cleaning Contract 41642 Pulzmeisler 4.906.29 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41643 PCS Express 110.00 Couder Service 41644 R.L.Abbott 8 Associates 4.000.00 Kem County Blosolids Consulting Services 41645 Radius Maps 2,100.00 Professional Services 1-2.4 41646 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,289.70 Trash Removal 41647 Reliastar 8,553.55 Employee Medical Health Premium 41648 Role Rooter 323.25 Sewer Line Clearing 41649 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 974.61 Plumbing Supplies 41650 RJN Group, Inc. 11.287.60 CMMS Consulting Services 41651 RPM Electric Motors 1,049.35 Mechanical Repairs 8 Testing 41652 Safely-Kleen 5,269.38 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement 41653 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 8,932.50 Construction-Manhole Repairs 8 Rehabilitation of Concrete Surfaces 41654 Schneider Electric 228.20 Instrument Repairs 8 Maintenance 41655 Schwirg America,Inc. 2,256.32 Pump Supplies 41656 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 29.99 Specialty Gases 41657 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 3.474.00 Lab Equipment Parts 8 Service 41658 Self-Insurance Plans 1.953.68 State Workere'Compensation User Funding 8 Assessment 41659 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 449.32 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41660 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering 1,356.34 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41661 Alddch Chemical Co. 83.97 Lab Pans 8 Supplies 41662 Skylights Unlimited 3.250.00 Skylights Replacement 8 Removal 41663 So.Cal.Gee Company 16,817.58 Natural Gas 41664 Southern California Edison 17,215.78 Power 416% Southern California Edison 9,265.52 Power 41666 Sparkletls 1,885.45 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 41667 Strata International,Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 41868 Summit Steel 970.16 Metal 416M Sunset Industrial Parts 371.43 Mechanical Supplies 41670 Super Power Products 387.00 Janitorial Supplies 41671 Synargro Technologies,Inc. 15.289.27 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 41672 SAWPA 3,000.00 Prof.Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 41673 SCCWRP 320.00 Lab Meeting Registration 41674 SCP Science 11.00 Lab Supplies 41675 SPEC Services,Inc. 11,325.96 Engineering Services J-33-1 41676 Tasew,Inc. 1,691.89 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 41677 Taylor-Dunn 1,848.56 Electric Cart Parts 41678 Terminix International Co. 375.00 Pest Control 41979 Tetra Tech,Inc. 5,797.28 Professional Services 11-22 41680 The Orange County Register 1,612.80 Notices 8 Ada 41681 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 7.047.91 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41682 Thomson Financial 646.50 Subscription 41683 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1.280.00 Elevator Maintenance 41684 Daily Pilot 168.75 Notices 6 Ads 41685 Tran Consulting Engineers 3,526.00 Prof.Saw,-Fiber Optics EA.at Pit. 1 8 Clarifiers N 8 P Retaining Wall Ext.at Pit.2 Page 5 of 13 Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Desoription 41686 Tropical Plaza Nursery.Inc. 24.953.00 Contract Gro indskeeping MO 5-11-94 41687 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. 271.87 Truck Supplies 41688 Teksystems 8.068.50 Temporary Employment Services 41689 The Unisource Corporation 752.72 Office Supplies 41690 United Parcel Service 113.65 Parcel Services 41691 Naval Post Graduate School 5.819.46 Pmfsssional Services J-85 41692 UC Regents 500.00 Membership 41693 URS Corporation 3,254.17 Professional Services-Air Toxics Emissions Testing for CGS System 41694 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 3.122.14 A/C Supplies 41695 Valley Cities Supply Company 463.95 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 41696 Verson California 4,040.84 Telephone Services 41697 Veme's Plumbing 975.00 Testing&Certifications for Bacidlow Devices at Fla. 1&2&Pump Stations 41698 Village Nurseries 8,220.00 Zoning&Application Fee Reimbursement 41699 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.394.76 Vision Service Premium 41700 Vocam USA,L.L.C. 357.65 Safety Video 41701 Vortex Industries,Ino. 1,982.40 Door Repair&Installation of(2)Windows at Warehouse File Room 41702 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 2,150.40 Lab Parts&Supplies 417M The Wackenhut Corporation 11,628.78 Security Guards 41704 The Wall Street Journal 321.43 Subscription 41705 IMRI 8,805.00 Temporary Employment Services 41706 Westport Apar4tua DBA Breaker Supply 377.33 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41707 Wilhelm Electric Co.,Inc. 972.00 Constriction-Pothole(3)Boring Sites 41708 Xerox Corporation 9,398.39 Copier&Fax Machine Leases 41709 Xpedex Paper&Graphics 440.70 Office Supplies 41710 Zumar Industries 164.80 Reflective Signs 41711 Zymad Corporation 4,500.00 Lab Instrument Service Contact 41712 California Bank&Trust 6,656.00 Construction J-334A.Retention 41713 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 3,459.60 Construction 2-41.2 41714 MMC,Inc. 5.387.40 Construction-Ventilation System Upgrades at Main St.Pump Station 41715 Union Bank of California 2,611.32 Construction P146-2&J-53,Retention 41716 Los Angeles Air Conditioning,Inc. 7.720.00 Retention Release-Dust Collection Sys.At File. 1 &2 Carpenter Shops 41717 James G.Tinfle 376.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 41718 Employee Activity Committee 95.00 Service Award Expense 41719 Robert Michm 658.88 Employee Computer Loan Program 41720 U.S.Customs 2,488.13 Customs Fee-Foam Media Shipped from Germany 41721 OCDM Marketing 2,396.10 Pudic Notices and Postage 41722 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 41,191.17 Long Term Disability Ins.Premium 41723 Orange County Sanitation District 505,459.25 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 41724 Southern California Edison 32,245.58 Power 41725 J W Contracting Corporation 290,646.00 Construction P2-60 41726 Union Bank of California 32,294.00 CnnsWction P2-60,Retention 41727 Airgas Safety 1.41428 Safety Supplies&Equipment 41725 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 735.99 Telephone Service 41129 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 132.98 Telephone Service 41730 Court Order 62620 Wage Garnishment 41731 City of Fountain Valley 14,791.54 Water Use Page 6 of 13 Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01131/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 41732 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 41733 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 110.31 Plumbing Supplies 41734 Cydus Envirosyslems, Inc. 6,763.44 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 41735 CASA 300.00 Administration Meeting Registration 41736 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 41737 Franklin Covey 74.52 Office Supplies 41738 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 41730 Interstate Battery Systems 1,620.73 Batteries 41740 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng AFL-CIO Local 501 2,552.04 Dues Deduction 41741 Irvine Ranch Water District 20.38 Water Use 41742 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 12.472.23 Construction-Fabrication&Installation of Curb Mounted Gas Flaps 41743 Labware, Inc, 1,500.00 Lab Training Registration 41744 MarVac Electronics 60.47 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41745 McMaster-Care Supply Co. 911.71 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41746 Millennium Associates 129.95 Publications 41747 Nahabll&Associates,Inc. 710.00 Purchasing Training Registration 41748 Orange County Marshal 88.34 Wage Garnishment 41749 OCB Reprographics 118.65 Printing Service-MO1/26M0 41750 OCFA 458.12 Dues Deduction 41751 Pacific Bell 127.20 Telephone Services 41752 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 41753 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 41754 Peace Officers Council of CA 900.00 Dues Deduction 41755 Raney Industries 3,990.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41756 Ruben B Tucker,L.L.P. 6,009.73 Legal Services-Crow-Winthrop Development 41757 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 108.89 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41758 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 41759 Southern California Edison Co. 2,000.00 Professional Services-Relocation of Service for Bushard Trunk Sewer 1-2-4 417W Southern California Edison 29.25 Power 41761 Slate Board of Equalirallon 599.39 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 41762 STILE-Society of Trlboiogists 810.00 O&M Meeting Registration 41703 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 10,717.03 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41764 United Way 306.00 Employee Contributions 41765 Verizon California 1,229.22 Telephone Services 41766 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 8.960.31 Lab Pans&Supplies 41767 WEF Disinfection 450.00 Engineering Meeting Registration 41768 William D.Cassidy 425.70 Meetingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 41769 James R.Harris 426.81 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 41770 Roy A. Handy 371.15 MeelingRraining Expense Reimbursement 41771 Robyn A.Wilcox 208.36 Meeting/Rraining Expense Reimbursement 41772 Patrick B.Carnahan 1,408.13 Employee Computer Loan Program 41773 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 495.00 Sewer Service Fee Administration 41774 Marc A.Larson 1.891.37 Employee Computer Loan Program 41775 Voided Check - - 41776 Air Products&Chemicals 25,052.81 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 41777 Black&Veatch Corporation 136,089,86 Engineering Services J-77 Page 7 of 13 Claims Paid From 01116102 to 01/31102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 41778 Blue Cross of California 227,299.22 Medical Insurance Premium 41T79 Brown&Caldwell 243.031.24 Engineering Services P1-37,1.98,241 &J-25-6 41780 BP Energy Company 260,268.60 Natural Gas-Spec.No.990048 41781 Cathcart Garcia von Langan Engineers 70.034.16 Engineering Services P2-82 41782 Cylec Industries 36,218.10 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9796-18 41783 J R Filanc Construction 26.167,00 Construction-Repair to Admin.Bldg.Auium Pool&Platform at Slater Pump Ste. 41784 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 63,62021 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 41785 M&W Zander Facility Engineering GMBH 42.750.00 Polyurethane Foam Cubes for Odor Control Program 41786 Manatt,Phelps&Phillips,L.L.P. 25,000.00 Professional Services-Strategic Planning&Advocacy 41787 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 42,283.56 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9.22-99 41788 Orange County Water District 60,855.16 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 41789 Pacific DSL#3 30,456.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 41790 Parsons Engineering Science,Inc. 90.145.46 Engineering Services J-42 41791 Projects Partners 45.615.45 Temporary Employment Services 41792 SchwOg America.Inc. 27,000.54 Piping&Valve Modifications to(9)Pumps at Pit. 1 41793 Tran Consulting Engineers 133,066.15 Engineering Services 1-2.4,1-17,7-21 41794 Tu1e Ranch/Magan Farms 99.177.22 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 41795 US Fllter/Envires 203,932.87 (2)Chain&Flight Sludge Collectors 41796 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 33,720.00 Temporary Employment Service 41797 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 54,986.87 Legal Senn cices MO 7-26-95 . 41798 The VaMms Company 108,812.80 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 41799 Ken Thompson,Inc. 1,260,078.00 Construction 546 41800 Pundilisl Contractors 27.028.80 Construction-Purchasing Bldg.Conference Room 41801 A-Plus Systems 9,202.64 Notices&Ads 41802 AccuStandald,Inc. 690.80 Lab Supplies 41803 Action IesW ments do Goldn State Cnel. 637.83 Instrument Parts&Supplies 41804 Great American Printing Co. 120.06 Stationery&Office Supplies 41805 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 605.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41806 Aeam Company 1,224.00 Safety Supplies 41807 Air Liquids America Corp. 668.43 Specialty Gasses 41808 Mirgas Safety 2,378.00 Safety Supplies 418M American Airlines 4,859.44 Travel Services 41810 American Leak Detection 350.00 Leak Detection Testing 41811 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 695.00 Lab Supplies 41812 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 400.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 41813 Appleone Employment Service 2,602.60 Temporary Employment Services 41814 Arthur Andersen,L.L.P. 21,299.00 Prof.Services-Inland Composting&Organic Recycling Program 41815 Aspen Publishers,Inc. 197.62 Publication 41816 Atkinson Fluid Power 156.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41817 ACS Hydraulics, Inc. 1,738.26 Mechanical Repairs&Testing of Hydromatic Pump 41818 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 60.52 Telephone Service 41819 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 63.21 Cellular Telephone Service 41820 Battery Specialties 218.78 Batteries 41821 Borthwick,Guy,Bettenhausen 9,908.64 Professional Services P2-84 41822 Bush&Assoclalas, Inc. 22,374.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25.97 41823 BC Wim Rope&Rigging 1,062.55 Sign Posts Page 8 of 13 -' Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02 Wamnt No. Vendor Amount Description 41824 California Auto Collision 359.55 Truck Repair 41825 California Dept.of Fish and Game 772.75 Project 1-24 Permit Fees 41826 Callrol, Inc. 608.79 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41827 Cambridge Integrated Services Group.Inc. 2,093.33 Professional Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 41828 Cambridge Isotope Labs 772.82 Lab Supplies 41829 C.R.Nelson P.E. 1.200.00 Engineering Consultant 241 41830 Cad Warren 8 Co. 624.21 Insurance Claims Administrator 41831 Carallo Engineers 7,890.57 Professional Services J-39 41a32 Carollo Engineers 5,696.60 Engineering Services P1-71 41833 Copelw Capital,Inc. 3,334A4 Copier Lease 418M Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg, 23.71 Office Supplies 41835 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 386.56 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 418M Computer Sciences Corp. 11,545.53 Consulting 8 Lab Services-Assay Pilot Project 41837 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3,214.07 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 418311 Consolidated Freightways 1,049.47 Freight 41839 Cooper Energy Services 1,788.48 Engine Supplies 41840 Corporate Express Imaging 872.79 Computer Supplies 41841 Corporate Express 401.34 Office Supplies 41842 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 13,585.00 Custodial Services Spec,No.9899-09 41843 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 761.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41844 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,464.80 Ins.Parts 8 Supplies 41845 Cyclus Envirosystems,Inc. 6,791.89 Professional Services-Anoxic Gas Flotation Process 41846 California Capacitor Inc. 390.18 Ins.Parts 8 Supplies 41847 CALOSHA 4,800.00 Penally Fees 41848 CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Ix. 163.00 Lab Supplies 41849 CWEA Membership 112.00 Memberi-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 41850 David's Tree Service 5,225.00 Tree Malnt.Service 41851 Del Mar Analytical 1,630.00 Blosolids Analysts 41852 Department of Motor Vehicles 8.00 Vehicle Decal for Wgh Occupancy Vehicle 41853 Detection Instruments Corporation 7,915.76 Gas Data Logger 41854 Dionex Corporation 1.427.00 Lab Equipment Maint. 41855 Duhig 8 Company,In. 91.45 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41855 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 416.86 Paint Supplies 41857 DIRECTV 335.00 Subscription 41858 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 474.89 Electrical Supplies 41859 Edwin M.Perkins 11,181.01 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance 41860 Elliott Bay Design Group 7,043.35 Professional Services-Preliminary Design 8 Cost Analysis for Monitoring Vessel 41861 Employee Benefits Specialists.Inc. 10,168.73 Reimbursed Employee Benefits-December 2001 41862 Enchanter,Inc. 5,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 41863 FedEx Corporation 92.65 Air Freight 41864 Fisher Scientific 5,454.00 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 41865 Foodcraft Coffee 8 Refreshment Services 351.57 Meeting Supplies 41866 Foote-Jones/Illinois Gear 2,909.17 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41867 Fountain Valley Camera 28.95 Photo Supplies 41868 Franklin Covey 59.48 Office Supplies 41869 FLW,Inc. 589.19 Ins.Parts 8 Supplies Page 9 of 13 Claims Paid From 01/16t02 to 01/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 41870 Ganahl Lumber Company 56.69 Lumber/Hardware 41871 General Petroleum 8,894.41 Unleaded Gasoline 41872 George Yardley Co. 1,922.26 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 41873 Godenwast Fence Company 924.00 Chain Link Fencing 41874 WIN Grainger,Inc. 651.74 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 41875 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 53.85 Janitorial Supplies 41876 Westmark Sales, Inc/GLI International 593.51 Mechanical Pans 8 Supplies 41877 Herb's Blackforest Bakery 8 Deli 156.90 Meeting Expenses 41878 Hilti, Inc. 7,926.08 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41S79 Home Depot 292.67 Small Hardware 41880 Horizon Technology 224.00 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 41881 City of Huntington Beach 18,814.43 Water Use 41882 Idem1 2,583.00 Lab Equipment Maint. 41883 Imaging Express 410.26 Printer Maintenance 41884 Imaging Plus,Inc. 2.402.44 Printing Service 41885 Industrial Distribution Group 561.09 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 41886 Industrial Metal Supply 1,394.76 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41887 iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 215.00 OBslle Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 41888 Irvine Photo Graphics 126.07 Photographic Services 41889 J 8 L Industrial Supply 290.77 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41690 J.G.Tucker and Son. Inc. 1,299.86 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41891 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 1,953.97 Construction-Plant 2 Gale Repairs 41892 Johnson 8 Associates,L.L.C. 5,365.75 Professional Services-Compensation 8 Classification Study 41893 Johnstone Supply 172.63 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41894 Karen Monaco 8 Associates 4,770.00 FIS Support Services 41896 Lab Support 3,303.50 Temporary Employment Services 41896 Law Journal Press 154.32 Publication 41897 Lee 8 Ro,Inc. 9.148.24 Engineering Consulting Services J-71-7 41898 Lexis-Neils 141.38 Books 8 Publications 41699 LINer Company do Gerald Jones 3,935.00 Professlonal Service-DART MO 9-22-99 41900 M.J.Schiff 8 Associates,Inc. 1,918.40 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 41901 Maintenance Technology Corp. 515.89 Mechanical Supplies 41902 Manleys Boiler Repair Company,Inc. 880.00 Emissions Testing 41903 Markel Lab 152.03 Lab Parts 8 Supplies 41904 MCBaln Instruments 626.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 41905 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 2,603.71 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 41906 Mec Analytical System 5,286.16 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 41907 Mission Abrasive 8 Janitorial Supplies 82.28 Janitorial Supplies 41908 Mission Uniform Service 4,373.06 Uniform Rentals 41g09 Mobile Mini,L.L.C. 79.56 Storage Bins Rental 41910 MCR Technologies, Inc. 598.83 Charts 41911 MDS Consulting 2,520.00 Professional Services-Surveying Services 41912 National Plant Services,Inc. 12.896.74 Vacuum Truck Services 41913 Neal Supply Co. 57.11 Plumbing Supplies 41914 NeWersant of Silicone Valley 1,178.13 Security System Maintenance 41915 Ninyo 8 Moore Corporate Accounting 9,2W.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 Page 10 of 13 '" Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02 Warrant No. Veneer Amount Description 41916 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mail Delivery Service 41917 NAFA,Inc. 84.00 Printing 41918 NCG Porter Novell 6,364.19 Prof.Services-Public Relations 41919 O.C.W industflal Co. 397.85 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 41920 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,388.77 Office Supplies 41921 Omrdmark Instrument Corp 849.57 Instrument Rental 41922 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 12123 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41923 Oxygen Service Company 867.46 Specialty Gases 41924 OCE-USA, Inc. 251.00 Computer Equipment Maint. 41925 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 343.45 A/C Filters 41926 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,749.31 Plumbing Supplies 41927 Pacific Parts&Controls 77.88 Instrument Supplies 41928 Parker Supply Company 10,117.54 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41929 Patriot Video Productions 1,688.10 Video Services 41930 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 246.33 Lab Supplies 41931 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 11,521.37 Sodium Hypochlodte 41932 Polydyne,Inc. 24,533.22 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 41933 Hach c/o Penton Industries 1,886.56 Instrument Supplies 41934 Power Bros.Machine,Inc. 550.00 Mechanical Malnt. 41935 Primedia Business 431.63 Publications 41936 PAPA-Pesticide Applicator Seminar 110.00 Administration Meeting Registration 41937 PSOC Pool Supply of Orange County,Inc. 19.04 Electrical Supplies 41938 COS,L.L.C. 284.49 Investment Management Program Service 41939 Rainln Instrument Co.,Inc. 124.56 Instrument Repairs&Maim.Service 41940 Rockhufst College Continuing Education 592.50 Accounting Training Registration 41941 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 1,626.35 Plumbing Supplies 41942 Santa Ana Reg.Water Quality Control 4,500.00 Permit&Certification for J-39 41943 Sea-BIM Electronics,Inc. 2,507.00 Lab Equipment Parts&Service 41944 City of Seal Beach 113.65 Water Use 41M Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 1,207.35 Mechanical Supplies 41946 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 153.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41947 Supelco, Inc. 352.87 Lab Supplies 41948 Snap On Industrial 331.51 Tools 41949 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 1,050.70 FY 200MI Emissions,Operating&Misc. Permit Fees 41950 Southern Calif Coaslal Water Research 20,375.00 Professional Services-Spill Impact Modeling Project-Newpon Bay Watershed 41951 Spheron Corporation 180.00 Legal Services-Turn vs.Kovacs 41952 Summit Information Resources 8.720.00 Computers-(4)Vantations 41953 Sunset Industrial Parts 567.15 Mechanical Supplies 41954 BARBS 285.00 Information Technology Meeting&Training Registration 41955 SARBS-CWFA 10.00 Membership-California Water Environment Assoc. 41956 SCCWRP 80.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 41957 Techpro Sales&Service,Inc. 144.39 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 41958 Tekdraulics,Inc. 1,577.05 Pump Supplies 41959 Tetra Tech, Inc. 2.088.65 Professional Service 11-22 41960 The Pittsburgh Conference 1.160.00 Lab Meeting Registration 41961 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,860.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies Page 11 of 13 Claims Paid From 01/16/02 to 01/31/02 Warrant No. Vend" Amount Description 41962 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 41963 Time Wamer Communication 40.47 Cable Services 41964 Torys Lock&Safe Service&Sales 99.39 Locks&Keys 41965 The Trans Company 944.71 A/C Parts 41966 Transcat 82274 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41967 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 150.00 Contract Groundskeepin9 MO 5-11-94 41968 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. 473.92 Track Supplies 41969 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 50.00 Lab Services 41970 Tuthill Energy Systems.Uo Mckenna 856.55 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 41971 Teksystems 6.133.00 Temporary Employment Services 41972 Ultra Scientific 495.99 Lab Supplies 41973 Union Bank of California 3.955.73 Banking Services 41974 United Parcel Service 1.106.00 Parcel Services 41975 Unocal 76 57.32 Fuel for Vehicles 41976 UC Regents 790.00 Safety&Emergency Response Training Registration 41977 U-Une 107.22 ONke Supplies 41978 Valley Safety Supply Company 84.05 Safety Supplies 41979 Valley Cities Supply Company 678.26 Plumbing Supplies 41980 Verson California 33.97 Telephone Services 41981 VAR Scientific Products Corporation 467.42 Lab Supplies 41982 The Wackenhut Corporation 4,936.97 Security Guards 41983 Waste Markets Corp. 21,259.91 Maintenance Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Material Removal 41984 Watson Bros,Inc. 564.38 Lab Parts&Supplies 41985 Waxie Sanitary Supply 379.63 Janitorial Supplies 41986 IMRI 6,387.50 Temporary Employment Serrices 41987 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 8D8.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies 41988 WEF 112.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 41989 Xerox Corporation 4,848.74 Copier&Fax Machine Leases 41990 Yokogavra Corp.of America 1.866.97 Instrument Supplies 41991 Olsson Construction, Inc. 2,6920g Construction-Fuzzy Filter Pipe Installation 41992 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 14,532.15 FY 20OD-01 Emissions,Operating&Misc.Permit Fees 41993 Emilio Adston 805.17 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 41994 Lisa Arosteguy 105.66 Meeting?ratning Expense Reimbursement 41995 Antonio Briseno 554.18 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 41996 Jeffrey Brown 703.49 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 41997 Daniel C.Fonteia 461.74 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 41998 Randy E.Harris 110.63 Meelinglrmming Expense Reimbursement 41999 Tod E.Haynes 443.50 Meetingri-mining Expense Reimbursement 420W Use Murphy 35243 Meetingrrrainirg Expense Reimbursement 4201)1 Robert Dolan 139.48 Meetingri mining Expense Reimbursement 42002 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 20,500.91 FY 200D-01 Emissions,Operating&Misc.Permit Fees 42003 Mane Became 1,373.81 Employee Computer Loan Program 42004 Boeing-Anaheim 13.064.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42005 Centex Homes 16,359.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42006 County of Orange(PFRD Geomatics) 296.69 Parcel Maps 42007 Frederick Dunmore and Gateway 2,332.80 Employee Computer Loan Program Page 12 0113 Claims Paid From 01/16102 to 01/31/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42008 ICN Blomedicals 1,853.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 42009 Orange County Sanitation District 585.00 Petty Cash Relmb, 42010 State Board of Equalization 500.00 Annemgon Fee Total Accounts Payable-Warrants 11,096,753.94 Payroll Disbursements 25623-25646 Interim Paychecks $ 30,179.65 Mandatory Payouts 25647-25765 Employee Paychecks 171,466.40 Biweekly Payroll 01/23/02 25766-25766 Interim Paycheck 2,708.34 Reissue Voided Check 69049-69502 Direct Deposit Statements 772,159.80 Biweekly Payroll 01/23/02 Total Payroll Disbursements 5 976,514.19 Wire Transfer Payments Stale Street Bank 8 Trust Co.of CA $ 104.143.75 January Interest Payment on Series 2000 A 8 B Certificates of Participation Stale Street Bank 8 Treat Co.of CA 2,825,423.61 January Interest Payment on Series 1990-92 Advance Refund Certificates of Parlicipalion Total WIre Transfer Payments 2,929,587.38 Total Claims Paid 01116102.01131102 $ 15,001,835.49 Page 13 of 13 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Rw;-9oate ro ad.or Dir. a3/27/02 AGENDA REPORT Item NumOe lem NumGer a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 02/01/02—02/15/02 and 02/16/02—02/28/02 Claims Paid From 02/01/02 to 02/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 42011 Orange County Sanitation District 3 473,587.56 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 42012 Pacific Investment Management Co. 148,981.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 42013 Southern California Edison 68,335.44 Power 42014 Alrgas Safety 5,686.31 Safety Supplies&Equipment 42015 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2,631.60 Long Distance Telephone Service 42016 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 90.25 Telephone Service 42017 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3.870.88 Cellular Telephone Service 42018 Court Order 626.20 Wage Garnishment 42019 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 130.00 Publication 42020 City of Villa Park 10.000.00 Cooperative Project J-73 42021 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 42022 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 457.29 Electrical Supplies 42023 Consuhing-Specifying Engineer 21.00 Publication 42024 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 530.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42025 CWEA 43.00 Membership-California Water Environment Association 42026 Norman Eckenrode 041.47 Mesting7rraining Expense Reimbursement 42027 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 42028 First American Title Company 15,000.OD Escrow Fees-ICOR Project 42029 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 42030 City of Fullerton 64.31 Water Use 42031 City of Huntington Beach 42.84 Water Use 42032 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 97.70 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 42033 Intl.Union of Oper.Erg.AFL-CIO Local 501 2,552.04 Dual Deduction 42034 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2.264.21 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42035 Mellon Trust 18,530.08 Investment Custodian Bank 42036 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 4.851.35 Mechanical Pads,Supplies&Repairs 42D37 New Horizons 10,625.00 (5)User Licenses-Microsoft Windows Technical Training 42038 Newport Dunes Waterfront Resort 5,000.00 Construction 5-46 42039 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 2,461.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6.24-98 42D40 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Gamishmenl 42041 OCEA 455.80 Dues Deduction 42042 Pacific Bell 44.06 Telephone Services 42043 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 42044 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 42045 Peace Officers Council of CA 909.00 Dues Deduction 42046 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 42.30 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 4204T Shureluck Sales&Engineering 667.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42048 Smardan Supply Company 195.40 Plumbing Supplies 42049 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 42050 Summit Steel 352.28 Metal 42051 Textile Engineering Associates 2,042.00 Mechanical Maintenance Training 42D52 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 97M59 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 42053 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 17,253.63 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 42054 U.S Postal Service 5.000.00 Postage 42055 The Unisouroe Corporation 628.94 Office Supplies Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/01/02 to 02/15/02 Wammt No. Vendor Amount Description 42056 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 42057 Verizon California 808.26 Telephone Services 420M Kimberly C.Christensen 1,136.53 Mesting/6alning Expense Reimbursement 42059 Robert P.Ghirelll 686.32 Meeling7rralning Expense Reimbursement 42060 Terry W.Kde 455.67 MeetingRalning Expense Reimbursement 42061 Chandra R.Manlecon 284.65 Meetingrtramin9 Expense Reimbursement 42062 Canh 0.Nguyen 805.53 Meeling?raining Expense Reimbursement 42063 American Express 26,446.38 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 42064 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 491,204.53 Professional Services J-73-2 42065 Brown&Caldwell 164,952.99 Engineering Services P7-37 42066 Camllo Engineers 348,104.82 Professional Services P2.60&P2.66 42067 City of La Habra 402,013.00 Construction-Cooperative Projects J-73 42068 Flour Enterprises,Inc. 90,576.00 Professional Services J-84 42069 Harbour Engineering Group 29,802.52 Pump Supplies 42070 Jana Contracting Corp. 35,692.52 Construction-Emergency Sewer Main Repairs-Euclid&Imperial 42071 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 34,084.93 Medical Insurance Premium 42072 Kemimn Pacific,Inc. 81.449.45 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 42073 Mike Pdich&Some 222.409.89 Construction-Force Main Repairs at Bitter Paint Pump Station 42074 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 26.652.29 Construction-Natural Gas Line Replacement 42075 South Coast Environmental Co. 30.451.95 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 42076 SCAP 25,000.00 Professional Services-Compost Emissions Testing 42077 Tule Ranch/Magan Fames 119,160.07 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 42078 Vulcan Performance Chemicals 81.596.33 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 42079 The Yakima Company 56,116.15 Residuals Removal MO 3.22-00 42080 Adams/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 132,050.17 Construction J-80 42081 J W Contacting Corporation 239,749.00 Construction P2-60 42082 Margate Construction,Inc. $16,916.00 Construction P1-37&P249 42083 Southern Contracting Company 37,858.00 Construction J-33-1-A 42084 Union Bank of California 28,639.00 Construction P2.60,Retention 42085 Orange County Sanitation District 32.342.26 Workers Comp.Reimb. 42086 A-Plus Systems 8,044.80 Notices&Ads 42087 Acre Machinery,Inc. 1,644.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42088 Advanced Cooling Technologies 328.26 Electrical Parts&Supplies 42089 Agllent Technologies,Inc. 675.55 Lab Parts&Supplies 42090 Air Products&Chemicals 20.02 Lab Parts&Supplies 42091 Airborne Express 75.48 Air Freight 42092 Alfa-Laval,Inc. 5,854.07 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 42093 All American Asphalt 900.00 Manhole Grading-Sunkist St.,Anaheim 42094 Allied Industries 103.96 lab Parts&Supplies 42095 Alle-Robbins,Inc. 338.22 Instrument Supplies 42096 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 400.00 Service Agreement-Past Control 42097 Appleone Employment Service 1,289.62 Temporary Employment Services 42098 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 1,325.00 Toxicity Testing 42099 Pagenet 2,697.53 Pagers.Service&Airtime 42100 Arthur Andersen,L.L.P. 13.480.00 Professional Consulting Services-inland Composting&Organic Recycling 42101 Asbury Environmental Services 122.50 Waste Oil Removal Page 2 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/01/02 to 02/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42102 Aspen Publishers, Inc. 179.43 Publication 42103 AMSA 475.00 Mechanical Maintenance Meeting Registration 42104 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 47.31 Telephone Service 42105 AWSI 236.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 42106 Battery Specialties 458.56 Batteries 42107 BbMedeux Vitek,Inc. 568.67 Lab Supplles 42108 Bongarde Communications,Ltd. 79.25 Publication 42109 Marc or Darlene Bossu 81.57 Sewer Service Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 42110 Boyle Engineering Corporation 2,305,50 Legal Services-Crow Winthrop Development 42111 Buena Park Lumber&Hardware 326.16 Lumber 42112 Bush&Associates,Inc. 3,340.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 42113 SEX Incorporated 129.40 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 42114 BOC Edwards 112.88 Lab Supplies 42115 C.S.U.F. Foundation 9,787.50 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 42116 California Safety Services Group 805.00 O&M Training Registration 42117 Cameron Welding Supply 46.47 Welding Supplies 42118 Carollo Engineers 16,611.99 Engineering Services Pi-71 42119 Ralph Chavez 1,123.03 Sewer Service Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 42120 Coast Rubber Stamp Mfg. 47.41 Office Supplies 42121 Coast Transmission 432.71 Auto Repair 42122 CoIsParmer Instrument Co. 198.60 Lab Supplies 42123 Computational Systems,Inc. 4,535.00 Maintenance Agreement-Machinery Analyzer 42124 The Conference Group,Inc. 775.00 Lab Meeting Registration 42125 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 85.39 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 42126 Corporate E-Vress Imaging 1.182.37 Computer Supplies 42127 Corporate Express 1,676.75 Office Supplies 42128 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 14,452.00 Custodial Services Spec, No.9899-09 42129 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 535.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42130 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,162.02 Malnt.Agreement-Repairs/Irotallation of Base,Handheld It Vehicle Radios 42131 County Wholesale Electric Go. 1,529.34 Inst.Parts&Supplies 42132 CWEA 625.00 0&M Meeting Registration 42133 CWFA Membership 388.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 42134 CWEASARBS,Inc. 45.00 O&M Meeting Expenses-Re Technical Tour 42135 CWEA-TCP 66.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 42136 Del Mar Analytical 772.00 Biosolids Analysis 42137 Dell Direct Sales L.P. 8.774.09 (1)Phaser Printer 42138 DeZudk r/o Misco/SouthWest 7.524.00 Valves 42139 DeZudk/SPX Valves&Controls 2,289.69 Valves 42140 Grace Domoff 1,123.03 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 42141 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 400.61 Paint Supplies 42142 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 1,236.31 Electrical Supplies 42143 Elsevier Science 1,003.00 Publication 42144 Enchamer, Inc. 6,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 42M ESSCO: Engineering Sales Service 1,771.96 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 42146 FedEx Corporation 176.89 Air Freight 42147 Filler Supply Company 2,533.76 Filters Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/01/02 to 02/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42148 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 1,492.27 Lab Parts&Supplies 42149 Cristina Fisher 703.55 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 42150 Five Star Metals, Inc. 639.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42151 Flo-Systems,Inc. 188.50 Freight 42152 Fluid Dynamics 321.25 Primary Process Equipment Rental 42153 Foodcreff Coffee&Refreshment Services 583.04 Meeting Supplies 42154 Fountain Valley Camera 32.21 Photo Supplies 42155 Franklin Covey 342.00 Office Supplies 42156 Fry's Electronics 1.062.78 Computer Supplies 42157 Full Spectrum Analylice,Inc. 560.00 Lab Instrument Service 42158 GerraB-Callahan Company 5.491.21 Chemicals 42159 George Yardley Co. 2.104.62 Instrument Supplies 42100 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. 1,135.69 Belt Filter Press Supplies 42161 Gold Systems,Inc. 9,401.25 Professional Services-Data Migration&STORET Interface Application 42162 W W Grainger,Inc. 59.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42163 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 50.81 Janitorial Supplies 42164 GE Supply 6,611.91 Relay Output Board 42165 Hampton Tedder Technical Services 2,663.75 Electrical Parts&Supplies 42165 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Dell 86.80 Meeting Expenses 42167 HIII Brothers 3,941.03 Chemicals for Odor Control Testing at Sunflower Interceptor Sewer-7-21 42165 Holmes&Narver,Inc. 5,776.85 Engineering Services PI-44&P2-53 42169 Home Depot 212.75 Smell Hardware 42170 Hub Auto Supply 291.48 Truck Parts&Supplies 42171 Huntington Beach Chrysler Jeep 2,112.88 Vehicle Repairs 42172 HI Standard Aulomo0ve 1,290.18 AutomoWe Supplies&Installation 42173 I.D.Industries,Inc. 360.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42174 Ideal Electric Company 4,950.35 Electrical Parts,Supplies&Equipment 42175 Imaging Express 320.72 Printer Maintenance 42176 Industrial DistribWon Group 5.685.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42177 infinity Technology USA 3,604.35 Computer Supplies 42178 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 243.14 Lab Supplies 42179 Isco,Inc. 785.80 Lab Supplies 42180 J&L Industrial Supply 1,469.52 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Toole 42181 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 2,489.53 Lab Parts&Supplies 42182 Jack Higgins 3,500.00 Professional Services-Hiring&Interviewing Workshops Dec.2001 &Jan.2002 42183 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 10,674.27 Construction-Fast Interplant Meter&Easement at Pit.2 42184 Jays Catering 794.65 Meeting Expenses 42185 John Wiley&Sons,Inc. 357.11 Publication 42186 John's Phllly Grille 86.76 Engineering Meeting Expense Re Contract 2<7 42187 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 1.44622 Professional Services-Compensation&Classification Study 4218E Johnstone Supply 70.80 Electrical Supplies 42189 Kensington Electronics 1,062.01 Electrical Supplies 42190 Lab Support 3,065.38 Temporary Employment Services 42191 Labeflronix 683.60 Office Supplies 42192 Liberty Environmental 1.032.87 Lab Parts&Supplies 42193 Lindsay Engineering Services 5,953.75 Professional Services-Vibration Monitoring Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/01/02 to 02/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42194 Los Angeles County 1,038.50 Sewer Service Conn.Agreement MO 9/23198 42195 Li cci's 105.00 Meeting Expense 42195 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 8,425.41 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 42197 Maintenance Products,Inc. 2,073.11 Mechanical Supplies 42198 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1,850.54 Mechanical Supplies 42199 Manley's Boller Repair Company,Inc. 1,850.00 Boiler Repairs&Maintenance Services 42200 Matt Chlor,Inc. 4,288.75 Valves 42201 Matthew Bender&Co., Inc. 339.76 Publication 42202 The McGraw-Hill Companies 98.15 Publication 42203 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 455.91 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 42204 Mec Analytical System 1,465.00 Professional Services-Toxicity Analysis 42205 Mechanical Drives Co. 121.33 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 42206 Mllllronics do RMB Engineering 1,090.25 Electrical Supplies 42207 Milllmnlcs,Im 311.26 Electrical Supplies 42208 Mission Uniform Service 4,181.91 Uniform Rentals 42209 Mobile Mini.L.L.C. 79.74 Storage Bins Rental 42210 Morton Salt 543.61 Salt for Water Softener Systems 42211 Myers Power Products.Inc. 84.13 Electrical Supplies 42212 MAACO Auto Painting&Bodyworks 733.08 Vehicle Painting 42213 MARMAC Field Services, Inc. 12.730.41 Professional Services Pi-92 42214 MBC Applied Environmental Sciences 1,420.00 Ocean Monitoring 42215 National Microcomp Services 1,212.40 Service Agreement-Plant Automation 42216 National Seminars Group 395.00 O&M Training Registration 42217 National Water Research Institute 10,000.00 Membership 42218 NetVersanl of Southern California 2.198.10 Safety&Security System Supplies 42219 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 998.33 Lubricant/Dlesel Fuel 42220 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Acwunting 13,630.50 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 42221 Northam Tool&Equipment Company, Inc. 3,799.99 Portable Lift 42222 NCG Porter Novell) 7,590.85 Prof.Services-Public Relagons 42223 O.C.Windustrial Co. 515.06 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42224 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,721.21 Office Supplies 42225 OneSouroe Distributors,Inc. 2.297.49 Electrical Parts&Supplies 42225 Orange Fluid System Tacit,Inc. 93925 Flftings 42227 Oxygen Service Company 1,633,26 Specialty Gases 42228 OCB Reprographics 28.03 Printing Service-NO 1/26100 42229 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 1,110.30 A/C Filters 42230 Pacific Mechanical Supply 315.21 Pump Supplies 42231 Pacific Parts&Controls 147.49 Electrical Supplies 42232 Paul Pitt 264.30 Eng.Sam.-Tech.Tmg.&Sampling Protocol for AS Plant Selector Tech.Study 42233 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 22,537.61 Sodium Hypochlorite&Bleach 42234 Polydyne,Inc. 4.336.46 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 42235 Hach Go Portion Industries 198.56 Inst.Parts&Supplies 42236 Precision Industries 545.43 Mechanical Supplies 42237 Nancy Price 902.73 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 42238 Prudential Insurance Company of America 2,490.55 Employee Long-Tenn Care Insurance 42239 PCS Express 220.00 Courier Service Page 5 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/01/02 to 02/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42240 R.W.Beck 493.86 Professional Services P1-90 42241 Radius Maps 675.00 Address Maps,Listings 8 Labels Re PmJect J-77 42242 Raney Industries 14,980.00 (3)Stub Flanges,FIeX Connections 8 Mach.Services 42243 Registrar,Air 8 Waste Management Assoc. 570.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 42244 Roto Rooter 250.00 Sewer lateral Cleaning 42245 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 2,176.62 Pump Supplies 42246 RM Controls 48.18 Instrument Supplies 42247 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 9,087.00 Engineering Services-Tenant Improvements to Fleet Services 42246 RPM Electric Motors 2,406.84 Motor Repairs 42249 Saddle Island Institute 7,000.00 O 8 M Training Registration 42250 Safety-Kleen 121.76 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement 42251 Safety are.Inc. 237.05 Safety Video 42252 Schneldm Electric 684.90 Inst.Parts 8 Supplies 42253 SdrMng Anrerica.Inc. 512.45 Pump Supplies 42254 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 212.95 Plumbing Supplies 42265 Charles With 1.225.45 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 42256 So.Cal.Gas Company 6.097.82 Natural Gas 42257 Southem California Edison 1.951.63 Power 42256 Southland Construction 4,095.00 Construction-Patio Upgrades at Pit.1 42259 Slate Board of Equalization 153.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 42200 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 1.642.37 Stationary 8 Office Supplies 42261 Sunset Industrial Parts 610.63 Mechanical Supplies 42262 Super Power Products 775.80 Janitorial Supplies 42263 Bernard Swift 1.123.03 User Fee Refu d Re Septic Tanks 42264 BARBS 760.00 Information Technology Training Registration 42265 SCP Science 273.00 Lab Supplies 42266 SPACE 1,495.00 Lab Training Registration-Special Program and Continuing Ed 42267 Tekdraullcs,Inc. 1,514.27 Mechanical Parts 3 Supplies 42268 George Temple 1.123.03 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 42269 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 4.691.10 Mechanical Supplies 42270 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 42271 Daily Pilot 50.00 Notices 8 Ads 42272 Tropical Plaza Nursery. Inc. 8.449.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 42273 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc 429.68 Truck Supplies 42274 Teksystems 5,746.00 Temporary Employment Service 42275 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,262.75 Service Agreement-Lab Water Purification System 42276 The Unisource Corporation 272.31 Office Supplies 42277 United Parcel Service 88.27 Parcel Services 42278 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,542.45 Plumbing Supplies 42279 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 3.120.00 Temporary Employment Service 42280 Vented 27.88 Consultant Mileage Reimbursement 42281 Verizon California 2,284.72 Telephones Services 42282 V WR Scientific Products Corporation 4,700.47 Lab Pans 8 Supplies 42283 The Wackenhut Corporation 11,760.98 Security Guards 42284 Waste Markets Corp. 9,464.56 Malnl.Agreement-Grit 8 Screenings Removal 8 Digester Bed Matt. Removal 42285 Water Systems Cleaning Co. 24.765.00 Maintenance Services-Scrubber Towers G,J 8 Q Page 6 of 7 G Claims Paid From 02/01/02 to 02/15/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42286 Water 3 Engineering, Inc 170.00 O&M Meeting Registration 42287 Wave Sanitary Supply 574.36 Janitorial Supplies 42288 IMRI 7.050.00 Temporary Employment Service 42289 WS Atkins Water 20,000.00 Consulting Agreement-Testing of Improved Ultrasonic Sludge Treatment Equip. 42290 Xerox Corporation 13,902.26 Copier&Fax Leases 42291 Zee Medical 369.43 First Aid Supplies 42292 California Bank&Trust 4.208.00 Construction J-33-1A,Retention 42293 Castillo Western Industrial Constructors 4,591.30 Construction-Clarifiers P&O Retaining Walls at Pit.2 42294 R.Fox Construction,Inc. 22.406.00 Construction-Air Compressor Upgrades at Pit.1 42295 City of Westminster 643.38 (6)Automatic Water Meter Readers 42296 Orange County Sanitation District 1,510.39 Petry Cash Reimb. 42297 Ronald C.Cortez&Fys Electronics 2.986.73 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 4,942,129.03 Payroll Disbursements 25767-25897 Employee Paychecks $ 172,052.46 Biweekly Payroll 02/06/02 25898-25899 Interim Paychecks 3,560.62 Termination Paychecks 69503-69961 Direct Deposit Statements 764,388.14 Biweekly Payroll 02/06/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 940,001.22 Wire Transfer Payments Chase Bank of Texas $ 37,404.06 January Interest Payment on Series 1993 Cemficates of Participation Chase Manhattan Bank 77.347.93 Commitment Fee on Sens 200D Certificates of Participation-11/1101 -01/31/02 Societe Generale,N.V. Branch 55,552.19 Commission for Standby Letter of Credit on Sense 1993 Certificates of Participation Lloyd's TSB Bank 80.622.61 Commission for Standby Letter of Credit on Sens 1992 Refunded Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 250,926.79 Total Claims Paid 02/01102-02115/02 $ 6,133,057.04 Page 7 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/16/02 to 02/28/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 42298 ASAP Software Express 8 137.094.76 Microsoft Licensing Agreement for 650 Computers 42299 Orange County Sanitation District 482,782.81 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 42300 Pelnewebber Incorporated 32.575.01 COP Remarketing Agreement 42301 Southern California Edison 54,822.28 Power 42302 The Lewis Group 25.888.40 Consulting Service-Capital Project Management Process 42303 U.S.Peroxide 43,104.72 Prof.Services-Collection Sys.Odor 8 Corrosion Chemical Add.Demo.Study 42304 Airgas Safety 1,400.57 Safety Supplies 42305 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 84.82 Mechanical Supplies 42306 Appleone Employment Service 2.514.71 Temporary Employment Services 42307 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 149.83 Telephone Service 42308 Court Order 62e.20 Wage Garnishment 42309 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 42310 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc 122.03 Electrical Supplies 42311 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 237.56 Plumbing Supplies 42312 Converse Consultants 440.00 Geotachniral Services 5-46 42313 Cornerstone Management Consulting 750.00 Consulting Services-EMT Management Training 42314 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 42315 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 42318 The Holman Group 717.10 Employee Assistance Program Premium 42317 Industrial Metal Supply 2.044.06 Metal 42318 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 2,564.94 Dues Deduction 42319 Imensys Systems,Inc. 10920 Instrument Supplies 42320 Irvine Ranch Water District 33.18 Water Use 42321 IDMS:Imaging Document Mgmt.Solutions 9,577.65 Contract Services-Scan&Index Engineering documents for EDMS System(J-25-1) 42322 Kevin Orsech 2,058.00 Prof.Services-Analysis for Physical Oceanographic Data J-85 42323 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 1,070.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42324 City of Newport Beach 30.44 Water Use 42325 Orange County Marshal 45.00 Wage Garnishment 42326 Orange Fluid System Tech., Inc. 585.03 Fittings 42327 OCEA 471.36 Dues Deduction 42328 Pectfic Bell 14.34 Telephone Services 42329 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 42330 Court Order 298.00 Wage Garnishment 42331 Peace Officers Council of CA 936.00 Dues Deduction 42332 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 1,046.50 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 42333 Primary Source 268.75 Office Furniture 42334 Projects Partners 21,736.20 Temporary Employment Services 42335 Ramon Specialty products 14GA1 Oil&Grease 42336 R.A.Reed Electric 3,789.27 Motor Overhaul 42337 Relisster Bankers Security Life Ins. 8,502.38 Life Insurance Premium 42338 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 242.34 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42339 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 545.81 Plumbing Supplies 42340 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 42341 So.Cal.Gas Company 10,742.37 Natural Gas 42342 SAWPA 3.000.00 Prof.Services-Santa Ana River Watershed Group 42343 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 960.73 Mechanical Supplies Page 1 of 7 Claims Paid From 02116102 to 0212=2 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42344 Teksystems 4,798.00 Temporary Employment Services 42345 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 42346 The Vermge Group,L.L.C. 11,600.00 Temporary Employment Service 42347 Verizon California 4,383.56 Telephone Services 42348 2002 I&HW-CWEA,Inc. 2,100.00 Source Coned Meeting Registration 42349 Robert Onion 481.94 Meettngrrmining Expense Reimbursement 42350 City of Huntington Beech 2.020,00 Permit Fee-J-77 42351 Black&Veatch Corporation 100,237.65 Engineering Services Pi-46-2,P7-76 42352 Brown&Caldwell 92,699.76 Engineering Services 2-41&J-25-6 42353 BP Energy Company 122.561.91 Natural Gas 42354 Delta Dental 52,281.37 Dental Insurance Plan 42355 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 110,847.47 Fenic Chloride MO 9-27.95 42355 Mike Pri ch&Sons 52,269.41 Construction-Force Mein Repairs at Bitter Point Pump Station 42357 Municipal Water Dld.of Orange County 37,046.25 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 42358 Orsde Corp 31,102.03 Software Maintenance Agreement 42359 Orange County Water District 55,725.36 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 42300 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 37,599.08 Sodium Hypochlorlte&Bleach 42361 Science Applications Ina.,Corp. 161,616.42 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 42362 Southern Calif Coastal Water Research 35.000.00 Prof.Services-Plume Mapping(J-85) 42363 The Lewis Group 25,832.39 Consulting Services-Capital Project Management Process 42364 Tula RanchWagan Farms 116,547.84 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 42365 Water Environment Research Foundation 71.780.00 Research Subscription 42388 AdamefMallory Construction Co.,Inc. 125,172.80 Consuuc0on J-80 42387 Ken Thompson,Inc. 312,091.00 Construction 5-46 42368 Accutite Fasteners,Inc. 03.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42388 Ape Machinery,Inc. 799.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42370 Eurothenn Controls,Inc. 4,769.75 Ira.Parts&Supplies 42371 Great American Printing Co. 829.55 Stationery&Office Supplies 42372 Aeam Company 1,824.00 Safety Supplies 42373 Air Liquids America Corp. 419.12 Specialty Gasses 42374 AlrSea Forwarders,Inc. 700.50 Shipping&Handling-Zander Foam Media 42375 Airborne Express 14.43 Air Freight 42376 Airline Safety 2,50.02 Safety Supplies 42377 Alfa-Laval,Inc. 322.80 Electrical Parts&Supplies 42378 Appleone Employment Service 5.031.69 Temporary Employment Services 42379 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 150,00 Toxicity Testing 42300 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 685.72 Telephone Service 42381 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 100.98 Telephone Service 42382 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 6,839.85 Telephone Equipment&Supplies 42383 Basler Electric Company,Department 590 3,792.75 Electrical Supplies 42394 Battery Specialties 346.95 Batteries 42385 SioMedeux Vitek,Inc. 5,164.64 Lab Repairs&Maintenance Services 42386 Bongards Communications,Ltd. 15.00 Subscription 42387 BaNmick,Guy.Bettenhausen 4,758.18 Professional Services P2-84 42388 Burke Engineering Co. 983.05 Electrical Supplies 42389 Bush&Associates,Inc. 1,176.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 42390 California Coastal Coalition 1,000.00 Membership Page 2 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/16/02 to 02/28/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42391 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc 120.00 Membership 42392 Southern California Marine Institute 1,680.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 42393 Callan Associates,Inc. 3.550.00 Investment Advisor 42394 Cambridge Isotope Labs 1.344.56 Lab Parts&Supplies 42395 Cad Warren&Co. 448.58 Insurance Claims Administrator 42396 Carollo Engineers 1,781.29 Engineering Services-Blosolids Management Options 42397 Caddied Labs 250.62 Lab Supplies 42398 Charles P.Crowley Co. 5,776.39 Instrument Parts&Supplies 42399 Copelco Capital,Inc. 2.97 Copier Leese 42400 Cole-Parmer Instrument Co. 133.31 Lab Supplies 42401 Compressor Components Of California 4,842.69 Mechanical Paris,Supplies&Repairs 42402 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 11,994.48 Computer Maim.Agreement 42403 Consolidated Elect.Distributors.Inc. 3.082AB Electrical Pads&Supplies 42404 Cooper Energy Services 127.69 Engine Supplies 42405 Corporate Express 1.109.18 Office Supplies 42406 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc 12.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 42407 Cost Containment Solutions 6.482.60 Workers Comp.Services 42408 County Wholesale Electric Co. 507.85 Electrical Pads&Supplies 42409 CASA 80.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 42410 CEM Corporation 801.12 Lab Supplies 42411 CMTA Division I% 40.00 Accounting Meeting Registration 42412 CRBR,Inc. 8,948.65 Container Rentals 42413 CWEA 1,175.00 O&M Meeting Registration 42414 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 1,210.00 O&M Meeting Registration-Calif.Water Envimnment Assoc. 42415 CWEA Membership 224.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 42416 David's Tree Service 7,075.00 Tree Maint.Service 42417 Del Mar Analytical 1,337.00 Biosollds Analysis 42418 Delta Packaging Products.Inc. 113.46 Lab Supplies 42419 Diamond H Recognition 2,202.73 Employee Service Awards 42420 Dion"Corporation 12,161.33 Lab Pons&Supplies 42421 Dunn-Edwina Corporelion 53.88 Paint Supplies 42422 DIRECTV 10.00 Subscription Remaining Balance 42423 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc 493.24 Electrical Supplies 42424 Ecology Control Industries 2,00SA0 Hazardous Waste Disposal 42425 Eden Equipment Company 1,944.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42426 Eldridge Pmducfs 745.08 Instrument Supplies&Malnt. 42427 Electra-Bond,Inc. 147.08 Repairs&Maintenance Services 42428 Elecho-Test,Inc. 3,081.50 Electrical Acceptance Testing for Capital Projects 42429 Elliott Bay Design Group 6.145.80 Prof.Services-Preliminary Design&Cost Analyses for Ocean Monitoring Vessel 42430 Enchanter,Inc. 3,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 42431 Environmental Resource AssociationfERA 1.098.60 Lab Parts&Supplies 42432 EquipCo 9225 Instrument Maim. 42433 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 526.36 Plumbing Penis&Supplies 42434 Express Office Environment 465.55 Minor Office Equipment&FLHures 42435 ENS Resources,Inc. 4.020.24 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 42436 Facilities Engineering 3,660.00 Labor,Equipment,Materials Testing&Certification 42437 FedEx Corporation 215.67 Air Freight 4 Page 3 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/16/02 to 02/28/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42438 First American Real Estate Solutions 684.90 Orange County Property Information 42439 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 8.856.49 Lab Parts&Supplies 42440 Flo-Systems,Inc. 364.37 Pump&Pump Supplies 42441 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 99.00 Meeting Supplies 42442 Foss Environmental 5,857.50 Caustic Tank Cleaning 42443 Franklin Covey 357.47 Office Supplies 42444 Frys Electronics 173.25 Computer Supplies 42445 GE Supply 932.57 Pump Timer 42446 Ganshl Lumber Company 736.47 Lumber/Hardware 42447 Ganatt-Callahan Company 5,274,40 (4)Conductivity Sensors&Chemicals 42448 Gaslech 1,925.95 Specialty Gases 42449 Gemini Associates,Inc. 2,146.40 Fiber Optic Cable 42450 General Petroleum 9,709.22 Unleaded Gasoline 42451 George T.Hall 280.15 Instrument Supplies 42452 George Yardley Co. 298.47 Lab Supplies 42453 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. 6,945.44 Bell Filter Press Supplies 42454 Gold Systems,Inc. 10,378.78 Prof.Services-Data Migration&STORET Interface Application 42455 W W Grainger,Inc 157.18 Electrical Parts&Supplies 42456 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 89.99 Janitorial Supplies 42457 Edwards Systems Technology 5.919.00 Service Agreement-Fire Alarm System 42458 American Sigma,Inc. 7,198.15 Pump Tubing 42459 Harbour Engineering Group 10,731.90 (3)Impellers 42460 Harold Primmse Ice 55.50 Ice For Samples 42461 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 711.14 Laminales/Plestics 42462 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 209.50 Meeting Expenses 42463 Home Depot 426.00 Smell Hardware 42464 Hopkins Technical Products 557.20 Pump Supplies 42465 City of Huntington Beach 18,775.85 Water Use 42466 Imaging Express 225.62 Primer Maintenance 42467 Indoff,Inc 6.771.87 Lockers for Auto Shop 42468 Industrial Distribution Group 858.93 Mechanical Pans,Supplies&Tools 42469 Industrial Plastic Supply,Inc. 668.78 Plastic 42470 Infinity Technology USA 322.87 Computer Supplies 42471 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 437.97 Lab Parts&Supplies 42472 Intergraph Corporation 12.048.88 Software Melnt.Agreement 42473 mantel,Computer,Inc, 252.28 Server Upgrade Support 42474 Imensys Systems,Inc. 451.82 Instrument Supplies 42475 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 215.00 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NIT Server 42476 Irvine Ranch Water District 21.02 Water Use 42477 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 2,333.45 Specially Gases 42478 Jam Electronics 244.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies 42479 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 24,075.08 Construction 2-41,Water Line&Street Repairs 42480 Jays Catering 835.21 Meeting Expenses 42481 Johnstone Supply 604.39 Electrical Supplies 42482 Karen Monaco&Associates 10,336.00 FIS Support Services 42403 Kent Automotive 87.05 Automotive Supplies 42484 KL&P Marketing 1,000.92 Safety Incentive Items Page 4 of 7 Claims Paid From 021`16/02 to 02128102 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42485 Lab Support 4.918.25 Temporary Employment Services 42486 Law/Crandall 3,64025 Prof.Services-Materials Testing,Inspection&Geolechnical Services 42487 LaMoile Company 73.58 Chemicals 42488 Lifecom-Safely,Inc 856.61 Instrument Parts&Supplies 42489 Linter Company cio Gerald Jones 8.501.36 Professional Service-DART MO 9.22-99 42490 Luccls 86.25 Meeting Expense 42491 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 2.115.50 Professional Services-Corrosion Study 42492 Mag-Trol Long Beach,Inc. 251.07 Electrical Supplies 42493 Manley's Boiler Repair Company.Inc. 7,559.50 Boiler Testing&Repairs 42494 Mail Chlor,Inc. 5,058.37 Valves 42495 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 15723 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42496 Measurement Vanables,Inc. 774.73 (1)Refrigerated Compressed Air Dryer 42497 Media Resurfacing Systems,Inc. 150.00 Mechanical Maintenance Services-Sandblast Belt Press Parts 42498 Medlin Controls Co. 3,463.62 Instrument Supplies 42499 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 3,000.00 Professional Service-Tule Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 42500 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 6,84220 Mechanical Park,Supplies&Repairs 42501 Mllltmnics clo RMB Engineering 1,141.00 (1)Hydroranger 42502 Mission Uniform Service 3.994.07 Uniform Rentals 42503 Moreland&Associates 275.00 Accounting Training Registration 42504 Mykrolis Corporation 4.035.81 Lab Paris&Supplies 42505 MCR Technologies,Inc. 456.50 Mechanical Park&Supplies 42506 MDS Consulting 6,930.00 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Locations 42507 MISCO Southwest 172.56 Instrument Parts&Supplies 42508 National Plant Services.Inc. 3.290.00 Vacuum Truck Services 42509 Business Training&Development Services 4,550.00 On-Site'Powerful Listening Skills'Seminar 42510 National Water Research Institute 255.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 42511 Network Associates 2,430.00 Software Maint Agreement 42512 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 1,850.00 O&M Training Registration 42513 City of Newport Beach 61.98 Water Use 42514 N68o&Moore Corporate Accounting 1.005.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing MO 6-24-98 42515 The Norco Companies 152.00 Mall Delivery Service 42516 Offcs Depot Business Services Div. 781.19 Office Supplies 42517 Orange County Hose Company 4,147.30 Hoses 42518 Ortiz Fire Protection 2,655.00 Service Agreement-Only.Testing/Certification of Fire Sprinkler Sys.at Plot. 1 8 2 42519 Oxygen Service Company 1,913.77 Specialty Gases 42520 OCB Reprographics 847.19 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 42521 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 813.50 Filters 42522 Pacific Bel 877.68 Telephone Services 42523 Pacific Bell lntamet Services 324.00 Internet Service 42524 Parts Unlimited 30.64 Truck Supplies 42525 The Perkin Elmer Corp. 1,391.34 Lab Perk&Supplies 42526 Polydyne,inc 24.843.37 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 42527 Hach cio Portion Industries 676.89 Instrument Pans&Supplies 42528 Power Pumps,Inc. 152.83 Pump Supplies 42528 Process Equipment Company 441.76 Pump Supplies 42530 PCS Express 124.70 Couder5ervice 42531 R.L.Abbott&Associates 4,000.00 Kenn County Biosolids Consulting Services Page 5 of `' " Claims Paid From 02/16102 to 02/28/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42532 Randolph Austin Co. 667.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42533 Rolls-Royce Energy Systems,Inc. 2,641.39 Electrical Pads&Supplies 42534 Royce Multimedle,Inc. 300.89 Video Services 42535 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 3,908.35 Pump Supplies 42636 RS Hughes Co,Inc - 5027 Paint Supplies 42537 Safety Info.Inc 195.00 Subscription 42538 Safety-Keen 12,679.18 Hazardous Waste Service Agreement 42539 Schwing America,Inc 64926 Pump Supplies 42540 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 270.88 Lab Pads&Supplies 42541 Seaventures 5260.00 Ocean Moniwdng Vessel 42542 Second-Sun 16.49 Light Features 42543 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc. 69.01 Sealant 42544 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 3.050.12 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 42545 Supelco,Inc. 3.564.36 Lab Pads&Supplies 42546 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 636.89 Plumbing Supplies 42547 SoflCholce 4,559.60 Software 42548 South Coast Environmental Co. 377.50 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 42549 Sparkletls 1,930.07 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 42650 Sperling InsL do Patten Corporate 4.065.87 Instrument Supplies 42551 Shale International.Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 42552 StudioVlsia 3.000.00 Computer Consulting Service-Internet Maint. 42553 Sunset Industrial Parts 4,387.23 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 42564 Synagm Technologies,Inc. 5,815.19 Residuals Removal MO3-29-95 42565 SARBS 190.00 Engineering Training Registration 42556 SARBS-CWFA 170.00 O&M Meeting Registration 42557 SARBS-CWFA 20.00 Membership&O&M Meeting Registration 42558 SPEC Services,Inc. 19.014.18 Engineering Services J-33-1 42559 Sevem Trent Laboratories,Inc. 4.978.00 Lab Analytical Service 42660 Taylor-Dunn 416.91 Electric Can Parts 42561 Techno Coatings 3,715.00 Painting Services-Fuzzy Filler PVC Piping 42562 Tetra Tell,Inc. 4,840.50 Professional Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 42663 Textile Engineering Assoclates 1244.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 42564 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 2.798.92 Mechanical Pens&Supplies 42565 Tonys Lock&Safe Service&Sales 230.43 Locks&Keys 42566 Tmn Consulting Engineers 12.718.00 Engineering Services 5.46 42567 The Trans Company 21.02 Electrical Pads&Supplies 42568 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 99.12 Contract Groundskesping MO 5-11-94 42569 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 136.70 Truck Supplies 42570 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 50.00 Lab Services 42571 Teksystems 6254.00 Temporary Employment Services 42572 U.S.Filter Corporation 1,282.75 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 42573 Ultra Scientific 172.50 Lab Pads&Supplies 42574 United Parcel Service 652.10 Parcel Services 42575 Naval Post Graduate School 22256.81 Prof.Services J-85 42576 Unocal 76 10.60 Fuel for Vehicles 42577 Vapex,Inc 7,618.17 Maintenance of(16)Sentinel Units 42578 Vented 2,850.00 Software Maintenance Page 6 of 7 Claims Paid From 02/16102 to 02/28/02 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 42579 Verimn California 80.75 Telephone Services 42580 Vertex,Inc 943.89 Software Maintenance 42581 Village Nurseries 26.35 Landscaping Supplies 42582 Vision Service Plan-(CA( 7,468.56 Vision Service Premium 42583 V W R Scientific Products Corporation 3,572.91 Lab Parts&Supplies 42584 The Wackenhut Corporation 8,838.82 Security Guards 42585 Waste Markets Corp. 22,257.85 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Men.Removal 42586 Waxie Sanitary Supply 368.62 Janitorial Supplies 42587 IMRI 6,380.00 Temporary Employment Services 42568 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 2,069.88 Safety Supplies 42589 Westport AparaNS DBA Breaker Supply 3,663.50 Electrical Pans&Supplies 42590 WEF-Registration Dept. 1.725.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 42591 WEF 260.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 42592 Xerox Corporation 4,106.32 Copier Leases 42593 The Yakima Company 24.321.37 Residuals Removal MO 3-22-00 42594 Patrick B.Carnahan 576.59 Meeling/fraining Expense Reimbursement 42595 Frank Chavez 567.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 42596 Norman Ecken.de 429.57 Meeting7Traming Expense Reimbursement 42597 Julie A.Matsumoto 493.96 Meeling/1'mining Expense Reimbursement 42598 James W.Matte 435.52 Meeting/Tmining Expanse Reimbursement 42599 James W.SAve 494.91 Meetinglfialnirg Expense Reimbursement 42600 Robert J.Taylor 623.35 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 42601 Karen A.Tumbaugh 31224 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 42602 Michael D.While 593.90 Maeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 42603 John Myer&Dell Computer Corp. 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 42604 Orange County Sanitation Dishicl 1,122.82 Petty Cash Reimb. 42605 Philip Cordova and Fry's Eleclmnice 2,700.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 42606 Tara Day-Hill and Best Buy 1.913.31 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,103,130.31 Pavroll Disbursements 25900-26011 Employee Paychecks $ 168,106.57 Biweekly Payrd102120102 20012-26030 Interim Paychecks 5,721.89 BOP Payment,OCERS&Insurance Reimbursements 69M-70419 Direct Deposit Statements 779.999.03 Biweekly Payroll 02120/02 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 963,827A9 Was Transfer Payments State Street Bank&Trust Co.of CA 189.901.97 February Interest Payment on Series 2000 A&B Certificates of Participation Total Who Transfer Payments $ 189,901.97 Total Claims Paid 02/16/02-02/28/02 $ 4.246.859.77 Page 7 of 7 `� BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeang Date I To'.0 ". 3/27/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9a Orange County Sanitation Distrkt FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: SEWER EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH "THE CO-OWNERS OF THE ARMSTRONG RANCH" GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve sewer easement agreement with 'The Co-Owners of the Armstrong Ranch" for the Armstrong Ranch development in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY On January 10, 1977, C.J. Segerstrom & Sons granted to the former County Sanitation District No. 1, a free 64-foot wide easement for the Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-14, in the City of Santa Ana. In the near future, the Armstrong Ranch development in the City of Santa Ana will begin construction. This development is bounded by Alton Avenue on the north, Bear Street on the east, MacArthur Boulevard on the south, and Greenville Street on the west. There are five co-owners of this development. They are HTS SCP, LLC, a California limited liability company; Yvonne DeC. Segerstrom No. 1, a California limited liability company; Henry T. Segerstrom Properties LLC, a California limited liability company; Segerstrom Properties LLC, a California limited liability company; and Ruth Ann Segerstrom Moriarty. This proposed development includes some residential housing, a large Catholic Cathedral, and a new school on the site. The existing Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, which transacts the property does not require the entire 64-foot width. Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Staff believes that a 40-foot wide easement, with an additional 10 foot-wide access easement adjacent to the Cathedral, is more than adequate for maintenance and access purposes. Most of the area covering the easement will be for a parking lot and entryway vehicular access to the Cathedral. However, some of the easement may border on the new school property. The agreement proposes that"The co-owners of the Armstrong Ranch" grant a new 40-foot wide easement, parcel "A", together with an additional 10-foot wide access easement, parcel "B", to OCSD for sewer purposes. In turn, OCSD will quitclaim the old 64-foot wide easement to the property owners to make room for the development. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No cost to OCSD. All construction, and connection costs will be borne by the developer. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The proposed action would take place through one agreement at no cost to either party. The various parties will afterwards record two new easements to be granted to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and record a Quitclaim Deed in favor of the property owners for the old easement, after the agreement is executed. OCSD's standard for new sewer easements is 30 feet in width. The proposed new easements will exceed the 30-foot standard easement width requirement and provide additional protection from future encroachment. ALTERNATIVES 1. Do nothing; do not allow any new easements or quitclaim of the old easement. This is considered to be a negative alternative because it would not allow enough room to build the new Cathedral. 2. Allow quitclaiming of even more existing OCSD easement width, to achieve the 30- foot standard easement for OCSD. This is considered a negative alternative for OCSD, because the size of the Cathedral should require even greater separation from the sewer, which is reflected in the agreement. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Sewer Pipeline and Easement Diagram DAL:CW:sa G�v.DeuuYenUe�BavE ApenW IUpW`]OM BovEMe^d Repalem]ONum NelN�VagAHdt•aoc A,.,,,.. mxav, Page 2 W ALTONAVE. OCSD 30'V.C.P. �Irp I ANR�A )•(FB*WABVTEASB48 / PARS A' (AC7SS EASBWM WEVERNLGIITOFAEW FB?M4NBVTE4S94SVT Cv4S7BPN LPAT l / OFAEWPBbiIINBVT MS9QW WL37MV LPRTOF OLD / E45nM LffiDTOF E49MBVT TO FE / AEWACC SS E459W VT QVIMAMED EilS7ERNLJWOF OLDMS9NBVT77 N / Nl5 MACARTHUR BLVD. RAITT ST. SEWER PIPELINE AND EASEMENT DIAGRAM BOARD OF DIRECTORS h7eebg Dae TO Btl.of Dlr. s n102 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a second time extension of six months for Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. CP-0005, with the City of Huntington Beach. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District (District) implemented the Cooperative Projects Program in 1999, providing funds to the local agencies for projects that reduce or eliminate inflow and infiltration (1/1)to the sewer collection system. • Contract amendments are issued to extend the completion date and invoice submittal date of projects. The program allows only two time extensions of six months each. The first extension is included in Amendment No. 1 and is approved by the General Manager. The second extension is included in Amendment No. 2, and must be approved by the Board of Directors. • Although construction was completed by the project completion date, the invoice was not submitted by the contract invoice submittal date due to delays in processing the contractor invoice, making final payments, and preparing the final report. • In order for the City to receive compensation for the project in accordance with the contract provisions, it is recommended that a second project extension of six months be approved. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The request to extend the project for a second time does not change the contract dollar amount of $950,200 for the District's contribution. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Section 8, Page 154) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The total budget for the Cooperative Projects Program, Job No. J-73, is$142,675,600, and will be spent over the next 17 years on projects that reduce inflow/infiltration (1/I)throughout the Orange County Sanitation District (District). The proposed project change does not impact the project budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. CP-0005, for the City of Huntington Beach (City)was issued on October 2, 2000. at a total project cost of$950,200. Amendment No. 1 to the original project schedule included a completion date of January 2, 2002, and an invoice submittal date of February 2, 2002. The proposed Amendment No. 2 for a second time extension would extend the completion date to July 2, 2002, and the invoice submittal date to July 30, 2002. ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the time extension. Not approving the time extension would not allow the District to provide funding to the City in accordance with contract provisions. CEQA FINDINGS Local agencies are responsible for CEQA compliance. ATTACHMENTS None PK:jo: G 9xp.dlaaBPnda�BUIId Agenda 0.,0 Q002B ,E Alenft 90)Jl]Erc R—v d. BQW1 Page 2 } a DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, February 27, 2002 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, February 27, 2002 at 5 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present,as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel North Eckenrode, Chair Ryal Wheeler Shirley McCracken, Vice Chair Randy Furhman Pat McGuigan, Chairman, OMTS Committee Carl Newhausen Steve Anderson, PDC Committee Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson,General Manager Directors Absent: Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Jim Silva, County Supervisor David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Gary Streed, Director of Finance Use Murphy, Communications Manager Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the January 23, 2002 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Norm Eckenrode announced that CASA Conference reservations are due to Jean Tappan as soon as possible. The conference will be held at the Resort at Squaw Creek in Lake Tahoe May 1-4. He also reported on his meeting with members and staff representatives of the Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 j February 27, 2002 Orange County delegation in Washington, DC on February 13. This has become an annual event co-sponsored by the OCWD, MWDOC and the Sanitation District. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson discussed the OCWD letter on the Metropolitan Water District Storage Contract and the potential financial impact on the Sanitation District. No action was requested. See No. (10). There are still some outstanding issues regarding the GWRS agreement. At tonight's board meeting a motion will be requested to pull the item from the agenda. It should be finalized in time for next month's meeting. The GWRS construction management services agreement will go forward. There will be no expenditures until the summer. The OCWD board will act on the agreement at its second meeting in March. Gary Streed, director of finance, updated the members on estimated future sewer user fee rates. He explained how the rates have changed over the past six years and the available options. At this time it is proposed that the board adopt a rate for 2002.03 of$87.50 for a single-family residence. Rates for industrial users will also increase. After the Strategic Plan is adopted and the level of treatment has been determined a multi-year rate plan will be proposed. These increases are exempt from Proposition 218 requirements; however, staff believes that the property owners should be notified of the increases that will appear on their property tax bills. Notifications will be mailed to properties in Areas 2, 3, 6 and 7. There is no need to mail to all property owners in the service area because they already pay at least the$87.50 minimum. Mr.Streed also discussed estimated funding requirements and revenue sources through 2010. In the event full secondary treatment is implemented,the estimated annual cost for a single-family residence will increase to about$200 by 2010. Mr Anderson and Bob Ghirelli, director of technical services, described the events leading to the decision to implement chlorine disinfection of the effluent. The monitoring results in waters in Newport Canyon indicated high counts of bacteria at levels not seen before. After conferring with staff and the Board Chair, a press conference was held to discuss the events and describe our plan of action. There have been some objections to the use of chlorine because of proven impacts on marine life. However,with careful oversight and proper holding lime, the residuals should be diluted enough to protect the area around the end of the ouffall. Dechlorination facilities may be necessary if the dissipation is lower than anticipated. Altercate processes and chemicals are available and they will be evaluated. Staff will prepare a more detailed explanation in the future. Staff is working with the regulators to make sure the proposed facilities are in compliance with requirements. Additional monitoring will be required. The chlorinated effluent will meet California Ocean Plan requirements. There is a tank farm at Plant 2 ready for use. Some additional piping and a meter will be added. Staff is also considering adding disinfection facilities at Plant 1 to increase the holding time. r Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 February 27, 2002 Mr. Eckenrode asked staff to prepare a report to the Board in September on the status of marine life at the outfall. Mr.Anderson described the relationship between disinfection and secondary treatment. Secondary treatment will reduce BOO and total suspended solids but will not reduce pathogens sufficiently. Disinfection will eliminate pathogens. Secondary treatment addresses environmental concerns. Disinfection address public health concerns. Lisa Murphy, communications manager, reported that a public information request for payments made to Chair Eckenrode and Director Pat McGuigan has been received. Staff will be presenting lump sum totals for fees and travel reimbursements only. Ms. Murphy also reported receiving 239 form letters via e-mail, fax and mail opposing the waiver. Of those, only 112 were from our service area. These letters are the result of a letter-writing campaign recommended by Surfriders. Only those letters requesting additional information will be answered. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that Crow Winthrop has filed two new lawsuits. A motion was made, seconded and approved to add the discussion of these items to the closed session agenda. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. Dave Ludwin, director of engineering, and Chuck Winsor, engineering supervisor, updated the members on the sewering of the El Morro Elementary School, which is under a'cease and desist' order from the San Diego Regional Board. Mr. Carl Newhausen, Laguna Beach Unified School District Construction Administrator, explained their concerns and schedule. The options were discussed. Staff was directed to work with IRWD and the school district to develop either a pre-annexation agreement or an out-of-District service agreement. When finalized it will be presented to the Board for approval. B. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in March were reviewed. C. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS IF ANY Chair Eckenrode and Director Anderson commented on the Joint Management Committee re SARI meeting held yesterday. Until the approximately$3 million SAW PA payment is received, they have recommended not finalizing the agreement. The next meeting is scheduled for April 16. 1` Minutes of the Steering Committee - Page 4 6 February 27, 2002 (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Director Steve Anderson asked staff to present a staff report on the OCWD letter regarding the MW D Storage Contract issue. He wants more details on the costs and credits. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for March 27, 2002 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for March 27,2002 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:18 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Section 54956.9,to discuss four items of existing and new litigation. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:55 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. bmitted by.,,;� n Tappan eenng Committee Secretary G W D.W lvOeMelS.'aMv V Can'nUN'�FaE�]V15L NsMes[4' RI+V UulaW'�alemaNgaemMrl@WOIOtt]Otxmnwu0ac DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE RE URBAN RUNOFF MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, February 28, 2002 A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, February 28,2002 at 3 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Shawn Boyd, Ad Hoc Committee Chair Don Hughes Steve Anderson, Director Vicki Wilson, County of Orange Don Bankhead, Director Bob Beardsley, City of Huntington Beach Tod Ridgeway, Director June Nguyen, LACSD North Eckenrode, Director Randy Fuhrman Jim Silva, Director/Supervisor Darrel Canut Directors Absent: STAFF PRESENT: Beth Krom, Director Blake Anderson, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Bob Ooten, Director of O&M Gary Streed, Director of Finance Use Murphy, Communications Manager Tom Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist Jim Colston, Senior Regulatory Specialist Pam Koester, Project Engineer Jean Tappan, Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the January 24, 2002 Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Meeting Page 2 February 28, 2002 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Shawn Boyd did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson said that AB 1892 has provided some interesting discussions. We're finding that no good deed goes unpunished, as the bill is being looked at with suspicion. Director Tod Ridgeway cited a need to get the correct information out to the public exactly what the bill does, and the same for our plans for disinfection as there are mixed messages going out. He also expressed concern that people are taking positions without any study of the issues. He asked staff to continue to answer questions posed by those who question our actions,as it is our responsibility to educate the public. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS—Items (A-C) A. Discussion on the District's Cooperative Projects Program to Fund Urban Runoff Diversion and Treatment Projects. Pam Koester described the background of the Cooperative Projects Program, which was implemented to reduce inflow and infiltration (1/1) by 20% over a 20- year period. The program budget was set at$142,676,000 with $10 million per year allocated. She described the types of projects approved so far as well as the approach and evaluation criteria. Current program issues were discussed in detail. One of the most important issues is project identification in the county. Of the 28 agencies in Orange County that could submit applications, only 15 have are in the program. Only$3 million has been spent since the inception of the program. More field data is needed on the local sewers throughout our service area to better define the sources of 1/1. Adding urban runoff diversion and treatment projects would require modifying the program requirements to match available funding and could potentially jeopardize our ability to meet the program goals if funding was diverted to urban runoff projects rather than I/1 projects. Until the District's charter is amended to include treating urban runoff, nothing can be done. Ms. Koester outlined the options: 1)funds are not diverted from the Cooperative Projects budget and a separate urban runoff fund is developed; 2)Cooperative projects budget is expanded to include urban runoff projects;or 3)OCSD would not provide funding for local projects. Director Ridgeway stated that the program would have to readdress the capacity limits if we move to include urban runoff. K • Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Meeting Page 3 February 28, 2002 Vicki Wilson described what the county would be working on during Year 1 of the new Storm Water Permit. Extensive inspections will be undertaken to better define what Best Management Practices (BMPs) need to be in place. She didn't anticipate the identification of a lot of diversion projects in the first year or so. All structural BMPs need to be evaluated to solve the problems, notjust one type. Director Ridgeway felt that constructed wetlands should be the responsibility of the Flood Control District. Ms. Wilson indicated that Sanitation District participation in funding the urban runoff diversion projects would be welcome. Until AS 1982 is passed, the District is limited in its participation. When it passes,there would be no problem with funding those projects. It was mentioned that new developments in the county would not be contributing to the urban runoff problems as permits now include a condition that they must handle the runoff in the development. Most projects will be retrofits in previously developed areas. Staff was directed to continue working with the county to find out how much time it will need to move forward; how do the projects get paid for; and how much urban runoff do we accept,what are the legal aspects, and where do we get the money to pay for iL When altematives have been identified,a report will be forwarded to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee for consideration before moving it to the Board for approval. B. Orange County's Storm Water Permit Impacts to OCSD. Tom Meregillano, Regulatory Specialist, updated the committee on the permit impacts to the District Staff will work with pernittees in Year 1 of the permit to develop a countywide grease control program, and coordinate construction, industrial and commercial inspections. The countywide grease control program will identify'hotspots',which are sections of all the sewer system subject to grease blockages, and source control measures of all sources of grease including restaurants. For construction inspections, staff will be coordinating with the County on any proposed OCSD construction activity within a pernittee's jurisdiction. We will continue to participate with Orange County Hazardous Materials Strike Force industrial and commercial inspections to coordinate joint inspections and investigations of illegal discharges and illicit connections. A separate set of Wastewater Discharge Requirements (W DRs)will be developed for local sanitary sewer agencies to reduce sewage spills within the Regional Water Control Board's jurisdiction. The District will work with the Regional Board and other local sewer agencies to develop the WDRs,which include the development and implementation of a sewer system management plan, and coordinate with permittees on a countywide public education program. v Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Meeting Page 4 February 28, 2002 Year 2 work will focus on development of best management practices and a comprehensive review of the District's urban runoff policy. The District will work with the County as the District evaluates its urban policy and program to make appropriate policy or operation changes, if needed. C. Status of AB 1892, legislation amending Orange County Sanitation District charter to allow treating urban runoff. Jim Colston explained that this bill expands the District's charter to allow treatment of urban runoff. Assemblyman Harmon introduced the bill to the legislature on February 6, 2002 and it has been referred to committee with hearing scheduled for March 9,or thereabout. CASA's legislative committee is scheduled to meet Friday, March 01, 2002, and some concern has been expressed by other agencies that this may force them to handle urban runoff as well. There has also been some discussion about included other agencies in the bill. Scott Baugh,our legislative consultant, has recommended that the District keep a low profile at this time on the bill because it is a local issue and there is support for it. Staff will continue to update the Ad Hoc Committee on the legislative progress of this bill. (9) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff meeting is tentatively scheduled for March 28, 2002 at 3 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. eY Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Urban Runoff Meeting page 5 February 28,2002 (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 4:27 p.m. Submitted by. V � appan, Commi tee Secretary GWUNMMWMCMx WmMeas4NWn RwMb}}�/d Moc Cam Wee Mmfea.4c i r Il Draft MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6, 2002-5 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 6, 2002, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum dedared present,as follows: Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services James M. Ferryman,Vice Chair Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair Robert Ooten, Director of Operations& Maintenance Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair Use Murphy, Communications Manager Don Bankhead Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Debbie Cook Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager Tony Kawashima Nick Arhontes, Facilities Maintenance Services Anna Piercy Manager Tod Ridgeway Fred O'Brien, Scientist Paul Walker George Robertson, Senior Scientist Kevin Hadden Directors Absent: Jim Wybenga Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary None Others: Randy Fuhrman Jan Vandersloot Don Schultz (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman and Don Schultz addressed the Committee about ocean discharge issues and disinfection of the effluent. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance q and Technical Services Committee Page 2 March 6, 2002 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair welcomed Director Debbie Cook as a new member of the committee. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not in attendance. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the February 6, 2002 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting was approved as drafted and ordered filed. b. OMTS02-12 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report,which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. C. OMTS02-13 Receive and file Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance,financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 6(a) through (c) under Consent Calendar. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS02-14 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to issue a request for proposals to qualified Ocean Monitoring Vessel Builders/Designers for Purchase of Ocean Monitoring Vessel, Specification No. V-2001-43BD, for an estimated amount of$1,300,000. Fred O'Brien, Scientist, gave a brief report on the design and scope of work for the pending purchase of an ocean monitoring vessel. Directors requested clarification on procedures of approval for the pending purchase. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors; and to further amend the motion to authorize award of the Purchase of Ocean Monitoring Vessel, Specification No. V-2001-43BD, to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount not to exceed $1,300,000. b. OMTS02-15 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve an agreement with M.J. Schiff and Associates, Inc.for the development of a Corrosion Management Program, Specification No. S-2002-60BD, providing for consulting services for a study of the District's two treatment plants, interplant pipelines,and collections systems, and to establish the requirements for the implementation of a comprehensive management program,for an amount not to exceed $145,000. t Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 March 6, 2002 Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager, gave a brief verbal report and overall review of the project Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTS02-16 Ocean Discharge Issues Update The Director of Technical Services, Bob Ghirellt, reported that Assemblyman Ken Maddox has introduced legislation regarding the ocean discharge permit, seeking a way to do away with the District's waiver. California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) has had several discussions and its legislative committee took a position of opposition to the bill, and will be making that recommendation to the CASA board of directors. Staff was not consulted by Assemblyman Maddox's office for information. It was then reported that a scope of work has been finalized with the University of California Santa Barbara Marine Sciences and the University of Southern California Sea Grant Program to conduct the independent third party peer review of the data collected during last summer's Huntington Beach studies. There will be several presentations by the principal investigators to the peer review panel beginning in April. A workshop is being planned for the Directors to hear directly from the peer review panel, as well as to provide an opportunity to ask questions of them. A meeting regarding the disinfection project was held with our regulators: EPA, Orange County Health Care Agency, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. An additional meeting will be held next week to discuss what regulatory requirements would be placed on the District if the disinfection or bleaching project were to proceed. Representatives from several environmental groups and the cities of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach have been invited to attend. It is highly probable that if the project proceeds as currently envisioned, a modification to the ocean discharge permit would be required. The regulators and District staff are mindful that the dual objectives of adequate disinfection for human health protection and limited final chlorine residual for environmental protection must be simultaneously achieved. Directors expressed concern about collecting sufficient sampling under the same conditions that transpired during the summer of 1999 when bacterial counts were high, as well as the AES plant not running at the same level. b. OMTS02-17 Revisions to Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Local Discharge Limits Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, referred the Directors to her written report and answered Directors'questions on impacts to local businesses caused by revisions to the wastewater discharge regulations. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance f and Technical Services Committee Page 4 March 6, 2002 (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology, reported that the second part of an infrastructure upgrade was delayed in coming before the Committee this month, but would be presented to the Directors the following month. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Nick Arhontes, Facilities Maintenance Services Manager,gave a brief update on the status of proposed waste discharge requirements upcoming for sewage collection agencies in the Orange County area. The new regulations will probably be approved by the Regional Board at its meeting in April. Mr.Arhontes reported that the District would assist and guide the cities within the District's jurisdiction wherever possible in meeting the new regulation requirements. Directors entered into discussion regarding inspection requirements and the possibility of legislation be added to require the County Health Department to assist in restaurant inspections. Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported that payment of approximately$112,000 including interest had been received from Southern California Edison for power exported to them last winter during the energy crisis. Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager,gave a brief report on the disinfection project He reported there was a long-tens effort that the Engineering Department is looking at, and anticipates three-to-five years before full-scale, permanent long-term disinfection facilities could be implemented. There is also a short-term effort to develop disinfection alternatives for a short-term period until the long-term project is installed. The goal of both efforts is to achieve AB411 ocean standards. Staff is working with environmental consultants and General Counsel to determine what requirements will be required as part of the disinfection project. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services had no report. (12) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager,gave an update on a five-year communication plan that was presented to the Directors in March of 2001. She reviewed the tools and strategies specific to the OMTS Committee functions that were accomplished during the past year. (13) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL i General Counsel was not in attendance. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 March 6, 2002 (14) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for April 3, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. (kyle i' Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary G1wp.dt NagerWa%0MTS200 2002 OMTS MnuWX030602 minutwAm OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date TO Bd.0IDir. 3/6/02 03/17/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMT502-14 12(C) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Originator: Fred O'Brien, Scientist SUBJECT: Purchase of Ocean Monitoring Vessel - Specification No. V-2001-43BD GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Authorize the General Manager to issue a request for proposals to qualified Ocean Monitoring Vessel Builders/Designers for Purchase of Ocean Monitoring Vessel, Specification No. V-2001-43BO; and (2) Authorize award of Purchase of Ocean Monitoring Vessel, Specification No. V-2001-43BD, to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount not to exceed $1,300,000. SUMMARY In May 2001, the Board directed staff to seek the advice of a naval architect to provide a detailed cost evaluation for an ocean-monitoring vessel. The District hired Elliott Bay Design Group, a naval architectural and marine engineering firm in Seattle,Washington, to conduct the analysis. The highlights of Elliott Bay Design Group's effort are as follows: • Held several meetings with District staff to evaluate the District's ocean monitoring scope of work and sampling strategies to assure all costs would be taken into account. • Evaluated various hull forms and materials, fuel oil and fresh water capacities, protective deck covering and hydraulic system requirements. • Surveyed seven shipyards for vessel designs that would be suited for the District's requirements. • Prepared three preliminary vessel layouts incorporating many of the ideas and equipment required for the District's monitoring program. • Estimated the costs for the preliminary vessels,which ranged from $1.15 to $1.3 million. The results of this effort confirmed the cost projected by staff of$1.3 million. Based on the Elliott Bay Design Group's findings, staff is confident that the District can purchase a quality built vessel to satisfy the requirements of the ocean monitoring program and insure the safety of the ocean monitoring staff while at sea. Staff recommends going out for bids for a vessel about 60' in length with a single fiberglass or aluminum hull. The request for proposals would specify lifting needs (a frame and/or articulated crane), fuel capacity, electronics, and laboratory space requirements. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A FO wli G 1wp EOV panOelBoa,O AOonEe gBpMS0002 BoaN Agen4a gappbW]OSllam IIIC�VppXl PwUesl9m flensea'. u1Lp31v.M1) BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Capital Equipment) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES A vessel contractor provided a solicited cost estimate for a 58' - 62' vessel, captain, crew, and all associated expenses to meet the District's monitoring needs. A minimum 10-year contract with the District would be required. The daily rate would be $2,400 per day for a minimum of 200 days or$480,000 per year. Staff will pursue discussions with the contractor to determine whether, a long-term lease arrangement is a cost-effective alternative to purchasing a vessel. Assuming the District purchases an ocean-monitoring vessel for $1.3 million, the following is a comparison of purchase vs. contracted vessel cost: Purchase price $1,300,000 Depreciation (20 years) 65,000 Opportunity Cost 78,000 Operating Cost 165,000 Total $ 308,000 (Contract vessel cost per year) -(OCSD cost of ownership) _ (Savings per year) $480,000 -$308,000 = $172,000 The savings over 20 years is $3,440,000 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A row. G: ft%gendaY rl AymN Reg,QW20 .a PW-Ra WWNI-12(c).Ves Purt mO= Remeea:VUW(. ) Page 2 a i OMTS COMMITTEE MeetlngDate ToBtl.orDir. 3/6/02 3/27/a2 tO rn Number Rem Number AGENDA REPORT Mbe 12 d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ernest Yeboah, Process Engineer Barbara Collins, Senior Financial Analyst SUBJECT: CONSULTANT FOR CORROSION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an agreement with M.J. Schiff and Associates, Inc. for the development of a Corrosion Management Program, Specification No. S-2002-80BD, providing for consulting services for a study of the District's two treatment plants, interplant pipelines, and collections systems, and to establish the requirements for the implementation of a comprehensive management program, for an amount not to exceed $145,000. SUMMARY • Staff recommends approval of a contract with M. J. Schiff for conducting a needs assessment and developing a Corrosion Management Plan for the District's facilities. • The District requires the services of an expert on corrosion and corrosion management systems to perform an evaluation of existing collection systems and treatment facilities and to provide recommendations for developing a comprehensive Corrosion Management Program. • The proposed work is being conducted in order to determine the most cost effective approach for managing the life-cycle of the District's facilities, minimizing failures due to corrosion, and develop a plan to implement this new program. • Four companies received the Scope of Work: Con-pro Companies, Inc., Harper and Associates Engineering, M. J. Schiff, and Villalobos and Associates. In addition, the Request for Proposal was advertised for 10 days in accordance with District policy. • The District received two proposals; one from Corrpro, Inc. and a second from M. J. Schiff and Associates, Inc. The firm of Harper and Associates declined to submit a proposal. The firm from Villalobos and Associates decided to sub-contract with M. J. Schiff and Associates. wow: � Page 1 • A team of District engineers reviewed, evaluated and ranked the two proposals. • Staff recommends approval of the contract with M. J. Schiff for a total amount not to exceed $145,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The recommended consulting services will not exceed $145,000. Staff estimated that the work should cost approximately $150,000. The fee proposal for this contract is with the staff estimate. This project has not been budgeted, however, there is sufficient funding to cover the cost of this project. The O&M Department is not prepared to implement the capital improvement portion of the Managed Maintenance Program, Project SP-68, Line Rem 32001-02 budget, Section 8, Page 132. Approximately $230,000 of the Special Project budget can be used to cover the cost of the Corrosion Management Study. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Corrosion Management Needs Assessment and Program Plan development consists of., • Review existing capital improvement practices, specifications, materials of construction and CIP documentation • Review of existing operating practices, procedures, program and documentation. • Development of Corrosion Control Strategy • Development of alternatives • Program resource requirements and costs • Report with conditions and recommendations The District facilities are valued at over$1.2 billion. Budgeted Strategic Planned projects being implemented will increase this value to over$2 billion within the next five- year period. The District is proposing to develop a Corrosion Management Program to protect the District on investments and optimize project cost and fife of the existing and facilities. Page 2 1 The proposed Corrosion Management program will mitigate the potential for catastrophic failures and manage the adverse affects of the corrosive environment that exists in typical collection and treatment plant facilities. Staff received proposals from two fines on February 5, 2002: Compro Companies, Inc. and M. J. Schiff and Associates, Inc. (M. J. Schiff). Harper and Associates declined to propose and Villalobos and Associates teamed with M. J. Schiff and Associates as a sub-consultant. Interviews were not conducted as part of the proposal evaluation. Staff reviewed and rated the proposals on February 7, 2002. M. J. Schiff was ranked the highest technically by the proposal review team. M. J. Schiff has a well developed understanding of the work and disciplined approach for performing work elements. M. J. Schiff has conducted several small corrosion evaluations of the District's collection facilities and is infinitely knowledgeable on the District's system. M. J. Schiff teaming with Villalobos and Associates, another corrosion engineering consultant that has conducted several corrosion evaluations in the treatment plant. The proposed team members have first-hand knowledge of the District's facilities and specialize in corrosion management. The proposals ranged from $107,960 to $145,000. District staff estimate the project cost at $150,000. The assessment study will take approximately 30 weeks to complete once notice to proceed is given. ALTERNATIVES Continue with ongoing operations and maintenance programs that do not optimize corrosion control in the District collection systems and treatment facilities. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A G\wp.dtavagenda\Board Agenda Reporee0002 Board Agenda Reports\030ZUtem 12(d).Corrmion Management Progmm.doc RM: a W Page 3 I r i a DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, March 7, 2002, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, March 7,2002, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Russell Patterson, Vice Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Mike Alvarez Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Alice Jempsa Maintenance Bette Krom John Linder, Construction Manager Jerry Sigler Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor Shirley McCracken, Board Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Interim Engineering Manager Matt Smith, Engineering Supervisor Directors Absent: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Steve Anderson, Chair Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Lauren Cook Mark Esquer, O&M Engineering Manager Non Eckenrode, Board Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Larry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor Bill Buffer Andrei loan Duane Jensen Larry Porter Randy Fuhnan Joey Racano Eileen Murphy Don Schultz (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Director Russell Patterson was appointed Chair pro tern in Chair Anderson's absence. PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 March 7, 2002 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Don Schultz suggested that additional studies be conducted before moving to disinfection. Mr. Randy Fuhrnan approved moving to disinfection as soon as possible and encouraged other to study the issue before dismissing the project. Ms. Eileen Murphy asked if the Sanitation District is using all of the secondary treatment facilities that are available at the treatment plants. General Manager Blake Anderson answered that some of the facilities are designed for standby in the event of equipment failures or high flows. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair pro tem Russell Patterson did not make a report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported that staff is in the process of reviewing Draft 30 of the GW RS agreement. Staff is working to develop default provisions. Terns had been agreed to and then another question was raised so the process starts all over again. He updated the Committee members on the disinfection project. The Board, at the last meeting, authorized going ahead with the studies. The 90 days mentioned at the meeting has proven to be a bit aggressive. Mark Esquer then provided a report on staff activities to date. There are two ongoing efforts: 1) long-term plan development, and 2) the short-term effort to do what can be done with existing facilities and minimal impacts and improvements to treatment operations to meet AB411 and permit requirements. There is some bench scale work underway with ultraviolet,ozone and hydroperoxide and other chemicals. It appears that bleach and dechlorination are the most promising at this time. Two consultants are being hired to assist with the short-term design and for peer review of the plan development. The exact schedule is unknown at this time because the extent of environmental review has not been determined. A report will be presented to the Board in March. In response to questions, Mr.Anderson stated that any disinfection process the District implements will not put the environment at risk. The requirements of the California Ocean Plan, EPA and the Regional Board will be met. He also reiterated that full secondary will not kill bacteria; it reduces suspended solids and BOD only. Adding a disinfection process without secondary will result in a slight reduction in BOO but not in suspended solids. (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin did not make a report. (7) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, provided an update on the 2001 Communications Plan and the things Communications is doing to support the Engineering Department. She explained the tools being provided as well as the strategies. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 March 7, 2002 Director Alice Jempsa reported that the local TV cable company is running the video on SAW PA that we provided. Director Mike Alvarez reported that the Orange Park Acres local paper, the Sentry News, is running an article on the level of treatment issue and staff should follow up with them. Ms. Murphy reminded the directors that talking points could be provided to them on any subject currently under consideration by the District, or on construction projects in their area. Staff continues to receive form letters via e-mail,fax and mail opposing the waiver. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (9) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items a-h) a. RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the February 7, 2002 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting, and order them filed by the Board Secretary. b. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Attached are the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%). This is an information only item. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There are two change orders this month for PDC Committee approval. C. PSA AND ADDENDA REPORT Attached is the PSA and Addenda Report. This is an information only item. Action on PSAs and Addenda that require PDC Committee or Board approval will be taken separately. There were no PSAs and no Addenda approved by the General Manager from January 24 through February 21, 2002. d. FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY REPORT Attached is the Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. This is an information only item. e. SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELOCATION AND PROTECTION STATUS REPORT Attached is the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) Relocation and Protection Status Report. This is an information only item. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 March 7, 2002 f. P00O2-10 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No.2 to Ocean Outtall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No.2, Job No.J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $175,769 and a time extension of 75 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$1,119,077;and (2)Approve a budget amendment of$240,077 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No.2, Job No. J-66, for a total project budget of$1,739,077. g. PDCO2-11 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Santa Ana River Interceptor Emergency Maintenance and Repairs, Contract No. 2-41-2, with Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc., for an Adjustment of Engineer's Ouantities, authorizing a deduction of $45,566, and a time extension of 45 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount to$404,434; and (2)Accept Santa Ana River Interceptor Emergency Maintenance and Repairs, Contract No. 2-41-2, as complete,authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. h. PDCO2-12 Recommend to the Board of Directors to accept Clarifiers P&O Retaining Walls at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000.60, with Castillo Western Industrial Constructors as complete,authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (h) under Consent Calendar. (10) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-h) a. PDCO2.13 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Memorandum of Understanding with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection,Contract No.2-41, establishing the terms of interagency coordination and interim reimbursement of expenses in connection with protection, repairs and maintenance of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, in a form approved by General Counsel. David Ludwin reviewed the terms of the MOU,which do not rescind the any part of the 1972 Agreement. Alternative analysis costs will be split 50/50. Funding options were discussed. i PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 March 7, 2002 b. PDCO2-14 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: (1) Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a budget amendment of$247,610 for Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J-40.8,for a total project budget of$687,610; and (1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee for additional engineering services for Strategic Plan Update, Job No.J-40.8,for an additional amount of $247,610, increasing the total amount not to exceed $597,340. Jim Herberg reported that the additional services were for assistance in developing the A and B budgets for 2002.03. C. PDCO2-15 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: (1) Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a budget amendment of$139,170 for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No.J-40-5,for a total project budget of$287,170; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates for additional environmental services for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No.J-40-5, for an additional amount of$116,170, increasing the total amount not to exceed$194,000. Jim Herberg reported that nine projects have either changed or been added since the last EIR was adopted. The EIR review must be completed before the projects can be started. d. PDCO2-16 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls,Job No.J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of $652,137,for a total amount not to exceed $1,619,118. e. PDCO2-17 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc.for Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No.5-49; Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50; Rehabilitation of the 141h Street Pump Station, Contract No.5-51; and Rehabilitation of the"A"Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5- 52, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of$495,247, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,645,048; (2)Approve a budget amendment increase of $1,322,000 for Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 March 7, 2002 Contract No. 5-49, for a total project budget of$4,882,000; (3) Approve a budget amendment increase of$1,376,000 for Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50, for a total project budget of$5,775,000; (4)Approve a budget amendment increase of$1,877,000 for Rehabilitation of the 14"' Street Pump Station, Contract No.5-51,for a total project budget of$4,493,000;and (5)Approve a budget amendment increase of $1,748,000 for Rehabilitation of the"A"Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52,for a total project budget of$4,596,000. I. PDCO2-18 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a budget amendment increase of $2,118,000 for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, for a total project budget of$7,016,000. g. PDO02-19 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Project Partners, Inc.,to provide project engineering and project management consulting services for the Districts Capital Improvement Program. h. PDCO2.20 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED TO: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Professional Services Agreement with CH21M Hill, Inc.for engineering services for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No.J-40-6,for an amount not to exceed $134,858. (11) INFORMATIONAL ITEM (Item a) a. PDCO2-21 Presentation on Rehabilitation of Various District Trunk Sewer Collection System Facilities Jim Herberg reported on the work that has been completed, is being done, is under design and/or construction, as well as future work that is being evaluated. Most of the rehabilitation is on pump stations, sewer lines and manholes that are over 30 years old. By comparing the amount of work that the District is considering on its systems, committee members can get an idea of the work necessary by the local sewering agencies on their systems of the same approximate age. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS IF ANY There were none. PDC Committee Minutes Page 7 March 7, 2002 (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 4, 2002 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Submitted by: ii(ad Tappan FIDe Committee Secretary G Mi NaHo%+UaW�n'. OSOW702 PM 4nsan me PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date TOBL.MDir. 3n/02 3/n/0z AGENDA REPORT Item Number Rem Number PDCO2-10 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: OCEAN OUTFALL FLOWMETER REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Ocean Oulfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, with Urbantec Engineers, Inc., authorizing an addition of $175,769 and a time extension of 75 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $1,119,077; and (2)Approve a budget amendment increase of $240,077 for Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66, for a total project budget of$1,739,077. SUMMARY Background • Job No. J-66, Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, includes construction of a new meter vault and installation of a new flowmeter on the existing 120-inch outfall. • Tran Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Urbantec Engineers, Inc., on June 28, 2000. Specialized services during construction for soils testing, excavation, dewatering, and grouting design is being provided by Ninyo and Moore. • Item No. 3 of the change order includes costs to grout below the 120-inch outfall pipe. In March 2001, Plan Change No. 1 was issued to the Contractor. The plan change made extensive changes to the below ground structures on this project. These changes were required to reduce unanticipated risk to the adjacent outfall pipe due to unforeseen soil conditions found after the project was bid. These changes included specific dewatering restrictions to perform the work. After the plan change was issued, soil grouting was found to be necessary below the 120-inch outfall pipe to perform the work involved with the meter installation and maintain the new dewatering restrictions. Grouting operations were performed in phases to reduce costs and eliminate risks associated with uplift to the pipeline. This item includes costs for the first two phases of grouting. The costs for the final grouting phase will be included in a future change order. The location of this project is in the southwest corner of R-.: � Page 1 Plant No. 2, which is greatly influenced by ocean tides. The purpose of the soil grout is to fill voids in the existing soils below the pipeline, which are allowing seawater to enter the excavation. Item No. 4 of the change order includes costs for the Contractor's home office overhead,field office overhead, and equipment rentals due to delays for this change. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date September 18, 2000 Original Contract Completion Date March 16, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 2 Current Contract Completion Date March 16, 2002 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Chance Order No. 2 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Demolish Abandoned Cast Iron Pipe $6,165 0 Changed Condition 2 Flowmeter Revisions $11,220 0 Design Change 3 Phase I and II Grouting $68,384 75 Changed Condition 4 Delay Costs $90,000 0 Changed Condition Total Chan a Order No. 2 $175,769 75 Job Completion The contract is now 15% complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ (2,692.00) This Change (Add) (Dedest) $ 175,769.00 Change Orders to Date $ 173,077.00 Percentage Increase to Date 18.3% Amended Contract Price $1,119,077.00 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 8, Page 87) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) nM„n:vmm Page 2 Y Staff requests a budget amendment of$240,077. The additional funds and reallocations requested for this project provide for additional staff time, construction support, and for all change orders to date required to complete the extended project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan. The final EIR was approved on October 27, 1999 and the Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order UM:dm G:W4)Atalagenda002W Agenda Repro 120o2 Board Agenda RepoM1aW302Nta n 13(c)J-66.dw �: aaosa Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE OUTFALL FLOW METER REPLACEMENT JOB NO. J-66 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ $ Design Staff $ 45.000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45.000 $ 45.000 100% Consultant PSA $ 57,200 $ 86.000 $ 20.000 S 106.000 $ 82.200 $ 82,200 S 80,000 97% Construction Contract $ 514.000 $ 859.000 $ 260.077 $ 1,119,077 $ 943.308 $ 175,769 $ 1,119,077 S 376.968 34% Construction(Other) $ 27.000 $ 125,000 $ 10,000 $ 135,000 $ 27,000 $ 108,000 $ 135.000 $ 87.780 65% Construction Staff $ 135,700 $ 284.000 $ 50,000 $ 334,000 $ 135.700 $ 196,300 $ 334,000 $ 260,968 78% Contingency $ 145.100 $ 100,000 $ (100,000) $ $ TOTAL $ 924,000 $ 1.499.000 $ 240.077 $ 1,739.077 $ 1,233.208 $ 482.069 1 $ 1.715.277 $ 850,716 50% ELMS.0037307M CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT OCEAN OUTFALLFLOWMETER REPLACEMENT JOB NO. J-66 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT W8100 $ 946,000 $ 946,000 180 180 CO NO. 1 5I23I01 $ (2,692) $ 943,308 -0.28% 290 470 bON0.2 ":,, `+AA` Il , 1A.399': . . <4 „ya uAwa EDMS:003730735 Page 1 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Enaineers. Inc. C.O. No.:Two (2) Date: March 27, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order(Deduct) $175,769.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - DEMOLISH ADANDONED CAST IRON PIPE This item is for labor, material, and equipment to demolish and remove 60 linear feet of 42-inch diameter east iron pipe in lieu of the concrete pipe shown on the drawings. This pipe was 14 feet below ground level. During excavation it was discovered that the pipe was made of cast iron. The additional work included cutting the cast iron pipe, dewatering, and shoring work required to demolish the cast iron pipe. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 2 and Urbantec's Letter Dated October 10, 2001. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,165.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - FLOWMETER REVISIONS This item includes extra costs for the new Flowmeter per the revised drawings. Change Order No. 1, Item 2 included changes to the design of this project to reduce risk. One of the changes in the revised design was to reduce the number of Oowmeter probes from eight to two. Accusonic was the specified and accepted manufacturer for the eight-probe gowmeter. However, Accusonic could not meet the District accuracy standards for the two-probe 8owmeter. Spading Instruments installed and maintains the existing outfall 0owmeter and meets District standards for the new two-probe 8owmeter. This change is for difference in costs between Sperling Instruments and Accusonic's two-probe 0owmeter. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B) 2a of the General Provisions. Reference District's Submittal No. J-66-20 and Urbantec's Letter Dated August 15, 2001. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $11,220.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Two (2) Date: March 27, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consultina Enaineers ITEM 3 - PHASE I AND II GROUTING This item includes costs for labor, material, and equipment to grout below the existing 120-inch ouffall. The purpose of this additional work was to prevent excess water from entering the construction area during construction. Phase I grouting included grouting below the north and south end of the 120-inch ouffall pipe. After Phase I grouting was completed, continuous dewatering for a period of three days did not prevent water from entering the construction area. Phase 11 grouting included additional grouting at the north and south end of the structure to form a water barrier around the construction area. Phase II grouting also was not sufficient in preventing water from entering into the construction area. Phase III grouting is in progress at this time of writing this change order and includes grouting all along the length of the pipe approximately 35 linear feet. This change includes costs for Phase I and II grouting work. Costs for Phase III work will be included in a future change order. Grouting was accomplished in phases because staff was concemed about any movement (settlement or uplift) or damage to the existing ouffall due to grouting work or exposed soil around the pipe. The pipe movement was monitored continuously during the entire grouting operation. Due to limited access, dewatering wells in the shoring areas were removed and replaced before and after each phase of grouting work. The cost breakdown is as follows: Phase I Grouting Work $40,900.00 Phase I( Grouting Work $27,484.00 TOTAL COST $68,384.00 This work item is on the critical path of the project construction schedule and a time extension of 75 calendar days was necessary for the District and the Contractor to review the changed condition, hire a grouting contractor, and negotiate costs for the changes and delays. This work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions and delays were negotiated pursuant to Section 50-8 of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference District's Field Change Order No. 3 and Urbantec's Letter Dated October 10, 2001. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $68,384.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 75 Calendar Days Page 3 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272MI27 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Two(2) Date: March 27, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers ITEM 4— DELAY COSTS This item includes delay costs associated with Item 3. The delay costs include costs for contractor's field office and home office overhead and equipment rentals on the job site. The equipment rentals included the generator, dewatering pumps, settlement tank, well screens, and excavating equipment. The delay costs are as of January 15, 2002 due to grouting work as described in Item 3. Phase III grouting work is in progress and is expected to be completed by February 15, 2002. The cost breakdown is as follows: Contractor Field and Office Overhead Costs, $600 per day for 75 days $45,000.00 Equipment Rental Costs, $600 per day for 75 days $45,000.00 TOTAL COST $90,000.00 This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 5"of the Special Provisions and Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. Reference Urbantec's Letter Dated January 10, 2002. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $90,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $175,769.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 75 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Two (2) Date: March 27, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 75-day extension of time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 18, 2000 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 16, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 75 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 365 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 545 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 16, 2002 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 946,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (2,692.00) This Change (Add) (Geduet) $ 175,769.00 Amended Contract Price $1,119,077.00 Y Page 6 of 5 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. C.O. No.:Two (2) Date: March 27, 2002 Job: Ocean Outfall Flowmeter Replacement at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-66 Consultant: Tran Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: March 27, 2002 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: Urbantec Engineers, Inc. Contractor Dale EDMs:O373 M PDC COMMITTEE Meeun37102 Ta Bd.of Dir. 03/07/Da 03/20 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number roco2-u 13 a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Project Manager SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS, CONTRACT NO. 2-41-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Santa Ana River Interceptor Emergency Maintenance and Repairs, Contract No. 2-41-2, with Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc., for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities, authorizing a deduction of$45,566, and a time extension of 45 calendar days, decreasing the total contract amount to $404,434; and (2)Accept Santa Ana River Interceptor Emergency Maintenance and Repairs, Contract No. 2-41-2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • Contract No. 2-41-2. Santa Ana River Interceptor Emergency Maintenance and Repairs, includes the portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI)that was in need of immediate protection in the event of high river flows. Construction work included: 1. Construction of approximately 4,500 feet of access roads serving 18 manholes, including a river crossing. 2. Inspection of manholes, including photos and condition reports. 3. Installing stainless steel strapping on the interior and exterior of each manhole. 4. Installing protection lids inside of the manholes to prevent debris from entering the pipe in the event of a failure of the manhole shaft during a high flood stage event. 5. Biological work (Subconsultant)to develop a Mitigation Enhancement Plan and the preparation of applicable Environmental Reports (i.e., Biological Constraints Report, etc.) • The emergency repairs and maintenance was performed to protect the SARI line until a permanent solution is adopted. The current budget of$600,000 was established by transferring money from the SARI Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41. • The work included in this contract qualified as emergency work under Article V, Section 5.03, Paragraph G, of Resolution No. OCSD 99-23. • Brown and Caldwell prepared the plans and the contract was awarded to Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. on September 10, 2001. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date September 10, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date November 8, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date December 23, 2001 Actual Completion Date December 23, 2001 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 Change Order No. 1 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Adjustment of Engineers Quantities $ 45,566 45 1 Other Total Change Order No. 1 $ 45 566 45 Job Completion This project is complete and ready for closeout. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 450,000.00' Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change Order (CO No. 1, Deduct) $ (45,566.00) Change Orders to Date $ (45,566.00) Percent Decrease to Date (10.13%) Final Contract Prize $ 404.434.00 According to the last regular commission meeting of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority on October 9, 2001, SAWPA will reimburse OCSD for incurred costs in this contract up to a maximum amount of$400,000. The exact reimbursement amount is subject to the review and recommendations of the SARI Protect/Relocation Joint Management Committee. Staff expects that the reimbursement will be 76% of the final cost of$404,434. which is $307,370. These figures are shown in the attached Budget Information Table. G 1.E.ge Ward P,,.Re.0002 B Id PW.FepersWJ9Niem 13Id1.2.1-2.Eot R.,.. MOM Page 2 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information Rem) The funds for this work were not included in the FY 2001/02 Budget. The current budget of$600,000 was reallocated from Contract No. 2-41 approved budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Staff filed a Notice of Categorical Exemption on July 19, 2001. In addition, a biological survey was submitted to permitting agencies. ATTACHMENTS 1) Budget Information Table 2) Change Order Status Report 3) Change Order No. 1 G.Mftepenee�Ap Regv QW2 Boero np �WWZIWm lNd).241-Tea %e W;ummi Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR EMERGENCY REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT NO. 2-41-2 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ S Studies/Permitting $ $ Consultant PSA $ $ Design Staff $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 IS 7,775 17% Construction Contract $ 450,000 $ 45,566 $ 404,434 $ 450,000 $ 45,566 $ 404.434 $ 404.434 100% Construction Administration $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 22,891 92% Construction Inspection $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 37,810 47% lContingency I I I $ 45566 $ 45,566 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ 600,00t (45,566) $ 554,434 $ 472,910 85% Reimbursable Costs I I I I I 1 1 $ 307.370 PROJECT NET 1 $ - $ 600,000 1 $ - 1 $ 600,000 1 1 $ 600,000 1 $ (45,566) $ 554,434 1 $ 165,540 30% CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR EMERGENCY REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT NO. 2-41-2 ITEM APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 9/10/01 $450,000 $450,000 60 60 CO N0. 1 Pending ($45,566) $404,434 -10.13% 45 105 EDMSIDw ClasslClass emplace/Change OrdemICha�e Order Status Report(003717854) Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Jamison Eneineerine Contractors, Inc. C.0 No. One(1) Date: March 27, 2002 Job: Santa Ana River Interceptor Ememencv Maintenance and Repairs. Contract No. 2-41-2 Consultant: Brown &Caldwell Eno. Amount of Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $ 4( 5.566) In accordance with contract provisions the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 3. L.S. Manhole Strapping 100.00% 166.82% 66.82% $ 76,000. $ 50,782.00 and Rehab. 5. L.S. Biology Work 100.00% 281.78% 181.78% $ 10,000. 18,178.00 Subtotal $68,960.00 DEDUCTIONS Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 1. L.S. Install base roads 100.00% 75.65% 24.35% $270.000. $65,737.00 Inc. earthmat and fabrication of river crossing 2. L.S. Inspect manholes, 100.00% 42.22% 57.78% $ 19,000. $ 10,978.00 submit photos, and reports 4. L.S. Install protective 100.00% 49.59% 50.41% $ 75,000. $37,811.00 lids in manholes Subtotal $014.526.00) TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER $(45,566.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 45 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272MI27 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Jamison Enameerina Contractors, Inc. C.O No. One (1) Date: March 27, 2002 Job: Santa Ana River Interceptor Emergency Maintenance and Repairs. Contract No. 2-41-2 Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Eno. The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this and all previously issued change orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this change order, but that no direct, indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by this Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 10, 2001 Original Contract Time: 60 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 6, 2001 Time Extension this C.O.: 45 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 45 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 105 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: December 23, 2001 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: December 23, 2001 Original Contract Price $ 450,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduot) $ (45,566.00) Amended Contract Price $ 404,434.00 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Jamison Engineering Contractors. Inc. C.O No. One(1) Date: March 27, 2002 Job: Santa Ana River Interceptor Emergency Maintenance and Repairs. Contract No. 2-41-2 Consultant: Brown &Caldwell Ena. Board Acceptance Date: March 27, 2001 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Construction Manager Date Approved by-- Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: JAMISON ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, INC. Date PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ad.of Dir. 3/7/02 3/27/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number 1Nm Number PDCO2-12 13(0 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Kathy Millea, Engineer SUBJECT: Clarifiers P & Q Retaining Walls at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-60 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept Clarifiers P & Q Retaining Walls at Plant No. 2, Job No. SP2000-60, with Castillo Western Industrial Constructors as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY • Job No. SP2000-60, Clarifiers P & Q Retaining Walls at Plant No. 2, provides for the removal and replacement of retaining walls around Clarifiers P & Q. • Tran Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and Castillo Western Industrial Constructors was awarded the contract on October 22, 2001. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date October 22, 2001 Original Contract Completion Date December 20, 2001 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date December 20, 2001 Final Completion Date December 20, 2001 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damages Assessment 0 Job Completion The project is 100% complete and ready for closeout. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 63,500 Previously Authorized Changes $ 1,344 This Change $ 0 Change Orders to Date $ 1.344 Percentage Increase to Date 2.12% Amended Contract Price $ 64,844 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Miscellaneous& Support Projects, Facilities Engineering Projects—Plant 2) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None c:.maudommama pxw amw��aoi amm Me+d+ewn+�»lel.svmoosoeac Page 2 PDC COMMITTEE Neebng Date To Bd.of"'. 3-07-02 3-27-02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC01-13 13(p Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Andrei loan, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Memorandum of Understanding with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for Santa Ana River Interceptor Relocation and Protection, Contract No. 2.41, establishing the terms of interagency coordination and interim reimbursement of expenses in connection with the protection, repairs, and maintenance of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • On September 25, 2001, a Joint Management Committee (JMC)was formed to oversee the planning, and implementation efforts related to the relocation/protection of 5 miles of the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI) located in the Santa Ana Canyon. The JMC is comprised of three Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) Directors, and three Commissioners from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAW PA). • The JMC has coordinated both agencies' staff and legal counsel efforts to negotiate and agree on the terms of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) focused on the interagency coordination, and on the terms of interim reimbursement of expenses incurred by OCSD. • According to the MOU, SAWPA will reimburse 50% of OCSD's expenses related to the evaluation of additional alternatives to protect/relocate SARI. The actual prorated share of each agency will be determined once an alternative is selected for implementation. The MOU also establishes invoicing procedures. • The engineering fee for the alternatives evaluation study is estimated at $700,000, therefore the interim reimbursement is limited to $350,000. • Staff and Legal Counsel have reviewed the draft MOU and recommend the MOU for approval. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The MOU establishes, on an interim basis, the agencies' prorated share at 50% each. Each agency would be responsible for 50% of the $700,000 study, or$350,000 each. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (section s, Page to of Fv 2001-2002) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The budget for the engineering work for alternative evaluation was approved on August 1, 2001. No additional budget is currently required. Attached is a Budget Information Table, which depicts the current budget status. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES The Orange County Sanitation District Board has the option of implementing the replacement/protection of the SARI line with reimbursement from Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) according to the 1972 Agreement. This alternative is not supported by SAWPA, pending further analysis of other alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS CEQA documentation will be prepared when the engineering evaluation of alternatives is completed. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table G:�w dWUgeMMl wO AWnE RPpa S=2B Td Agen ReMM1f WVIM 13I1 UWPA We R—sed: MOV Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR REALIGNMENT AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 241 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT7TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Develoipment S 17,000 S 8,000 S 8,000 $ 17,000 $ 17.000 $ 12,138 71% Studies/Permitting $ - $ 727.000 $ 727,000 $ 1.122000 $ 1,122,000 $ 488.875 44% i Consultant PSA $ 875,000 $ 8.000.000 $ 8,000.000 $ 4.606.273 $ 4,606.273 IS 2,751,011 60% r. Design Staff $ 366200 $ 1,506.000 $ 1.506.000 $ 831000 $ - $ 831,000 $ 272300 33% Construction Contract $ 21203400 $ 54,004.000 $ 54,004,000 $ S 0 0% Emergency repairs 8 maintenance $ - $ $ c $ $ 0 0% Construction Administration $ 1.262.300 $ 6.575,000 $ 6.575,000 $ - $ - $ 0 0% Construction Inspection $ 1,718,000 $ 3,315,000 $ 3,315,000 ':� $ - $ $ 0 0% Easement acquisition $ - $ $ $ $ 0 0% Contingency $ 5088400 $ 10,200,000 $ 10,200,000 �,� $ 600000 $ 0 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 30,530,300 $ 84,335,000 $ - $ 84,335,000 b: $ 7.176,273 S - $ 6,576,273 $ 3,524.324 54% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 30,530.300 1 $ 84,335,000 $ - $ 84.335,000 1 1 $ 7.176.273 1 $ $ 6,576,273 $ 3,524,324 1 54% t MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING THE PROTECTION, REPAIR, AND/OR RELOCATION OF A PORTION OF THE SANTA ANA REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, is made and entered into, to be effective this _ day of , 2002, by and between: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "OCSD"; AND SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY, hereinafter referred to as "SAW PA". RECITALS A. OCSD is the successor-in-interest to the County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, and SAWPA is the successor-in-interest to the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, the original Parties to the Waste Water Interceptor Capacity Agreement dated April 12, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement"); and B. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Santa Ana River Interceptor ("SARI")was constructed and placed into operation. A portion of the SARI was constructed in the floodway of the Santa Ana River, as depicted in Exhibit"A' (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Reach"); and C. As originally constructed, the Subject Reach was protected with approximately 15 feet of soil cover. However, over time, as the result of erosion, the riverbed has dropped in elevation, thereby reducing the soil cover to as little as three feet in certain locations; and D. Additionally, as the result of the implementation of the "Santa Ana River Mainstem Project", maximum stormwater releases from Prado Dam may be increased from 9,300 cfs to as much as 30,000 cfs, which may result in additional scouring of the riverbed, by as much as 20 feet. Scour to this depth may expose the Subject Reach, and could cause a structural failure of the pipeline, resulting in a discharge of untreated wastewater into the Santa Ana River, and the potential transport of sediment into OCSD's sewerage system; and wsa s-TLw:oi:D-1 e:Darnro2:014780r r E. During the Year 2001, OCSD began making interim modifications to the Subject Reach to protect its integrity and guard against structural failure, which modifications include obtaining permits, preparing plans and specifications, obtaining bids, and hiring contractors so that the modifications would be completed before the commencement of the 2001-02 rainy season; and F. Since 1997, OCSD has initiated a program to develop a long-term solution to protect, repair, or relocate the Subject Reach. This program included the evaluation of several alternatives, completion of an environmental impact report, and the commencement of design activities associated with OCSD's preferred alternative, commonly known as "Alternative D". However, as the result of several unresolved issues, and a substantial increase in the estimated cost of implementing Alternative D, OCSD and SAWPA have determined to jointly re-evaluate the alternatives; and G. The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding is to clarify the process by which OCSD and SAWPA shall jointly study, select, and implement interim maintenance, emergency repairs, protection measures, and a program to effect Major Repairs, including the long-term protection or the repair or the relocation of the Subject Reach; and H. This Memorandum of Understanding is not intended to repeal the Agreement, but to amend it only to the extent that the Parties intend to provide for a resolution of the issues related to the need to realign, relocate, or otherwise provide long-term protection of the Subject Reach which may be at risk of structural failure on both an interim and permanent basis, and I. OCSD and SAWPA intend to assist each other in obtaining third- party funds, including without limitation, funds from Orange County PRFD, Army Corps of Engineers, and Riverside County Flood Control District, to defray the costs of such Major Repairs, as set forth in Section 2 below. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDINGS IN CONSIDERATION of the foregoing Recitals, OCSD and SAWPA agree as follows: In the event OCSD desires or needs to protect, repair, or relocate the Subject Reach, such work shall be conducted as follows: 1. Maintenance and Ordinary Repairs. OCSD shall regularly inspect field conditions and periodically prepare a written report for review by the governing Boards of OCSD and SAWPA describing such conditions and making appropriate recommendations for additional repairs that would serve to further WSSS-TLW OD-18:02127I02414 219 2 protect the Subject Reach. OCSD shall perform maintenance and ordinary repairs in accordance with Covenant 5 of the Agreement, which maintenance and ordinary repairs, to the extent that they do not constitute "Major Repairs' within the meaning of the Agreement, shall also include conducting repairs to protect the Subject Reach from further erasion, and to modify appurtenant facilities to reduce risk of failure. 2. Maior Repairs. For purposes of this Memorandum of Understanding, Major Repairs shall include protection, relocation, reconstruction, repair, or replacement of the Subject Reach as set forth in Covenant 4 of the Agreement. SAWPA shall reimburse OCSD for a pro-rata percentage of Major Repair costs as provided in Section 3 and 7 below. 3. Cost Sharing of Major Repairs. Major Repairs shall be performed after the approval of SAWPNs and OCSD's governing Boards, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Parties expect the cost of such repairs to be substantial, and they recognize the importance of securing funds from third parties to cover such costs. Therefore, OCSD and SAWPA mutually agree to assist one another to obtain third-party funds to defray the costs of"Major Repairs". All such funds received shall be used exclusively for Major Repairs, including the construction of the approved preferred alternative, and will be credited against the total costs. The Parties are committed to pay their respective fair and equitable share of the unpaid costs not otherwise funded by such third parties. 4. Emergency Repairs. In the event of an unforeseen emergency with action required to protect the integrity of the Subject Reach, OCSD shall perform such Emergency Repairs. Should OCSD determine that an Emergency Repair is required, and SAWPA's financial participation is required, OCSD shall coordinate and consult with SAWPA (i.e., General Manager, or designee) prior to the commencement of such work, describing the emergency condition, proposed emergency action, and the estimated not-to-exceed cost. OCSD shall immediately provide written confirmation of the information provided, and allow SAWPA and its agents unrestricted access to the affected area. Such Emergency Repairs shall not exceed One Million ($1,000,000) Dollars without prior written approval of SAWPA. 5. Alternatives' Analysis. OCSD and SAWPA shall jointly conduct a study which shall consider all reasonable alternatives for the Subject Reach's protection and/or relocation, and to jointly develop a methodology that ranks those alternatives in accordance with appropriate criteria, including, without limitation, consideration of probability and risk of failure, project costs and funding, and public acceptance. OCSD and SAWPA anticipate that the cost of such Alternatives' Analysis shall not exceed Seven Hundred Thousand ($700,000) Dollars. SAWPA shall reimburse OCSD for a pro-rata percentage of such costs as recommended by the OCSD-SAWPA Joint Management W885-TLW:pj:D.l 8:0727102:0148219 3 1 Committee, subject to the approvals of the OCSD and SAWPA governing Boards. Until the final pro-rata percentage is determined, SAWPA shall reimburse OCSD for fifty (50%) percent of the consultant costs for such Alternatives' Analysis up to a maximum amount of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand ($350,000) Dollars, or such final approved contract amount for such consultant costs, whichever is larger. Such final contract amount shall be approved in advance by the Joint Management Committee, and the governing Boards of OCSD and SAWPA. The interim fifty(50%) percent reimbursement shall apply only to such costs incurred by OCSD subsequent to November 1, 2001. 6. CEQA Process. OCSD shall function cooperatively as the "Lead Agency" for the purpose of complying with the California Environmental Quality Act, as it pertains to the Alternatives' Analysis and selection of the preferred alternative. Such CEQA process shall address the recommended alternative projects of the Joint Management Committee, 7. Joint Decision Making. The Parties agree to the establishment of a Joint Management Committee, comprised of three (3) OCSD Directors and three (3) SAWPA Commissioners. The Joint Management Committee shall select co- chairs, who shall alternately preside over its meetings. A quorum for transacting business shall consist of two (2) members from each of the two governing Boards. OCSD and SAWPA shall each have one (1) vote on the Joint Management Committee. All staff and consultant recommendations concerning Major Repairs, including the protection, repair and/or relocation of the Subject Reach, the preferred alternative, project budgets, and the award of contracts, shall be subject to the review and approval of the Joint Management Committee, Board of Directors of OCSD, and the Commission of SAWPA. OCSD's or SAWPA's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 8. Project Implementation. OCSD shall manage the implementation of the approved preferred alternative, including selection of the Design Engineer, approval of plans and specifications, award and execution of a construction contract, and construction management, all in accordance with the applicable provisions of state law, and adopted rules, policies, and procedures of OCSD, subject to the approval of the Joint Management Committee, and OCSD's and SAWPA's governing Boards. OCSD's or SAWPA's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, and such approval or rejection shall occur within 90 days of the receipt of the recommendation by the Joint Management Committee. 9. Invoice Procedures. Upon determination of the pro-rata share obligations of paying for Major Repairs and approval of the OCSD and SAWPA governing Boards, the following payment procedures shall be implemented: A. OCSD shall prepare a monthly expenditure projection for the entire project, based upon all known costs and the project schedule. The WSSS-TLWtpI:D-180227102:p148218 4 projection shall be provided in the month of February for use in preparing annual budgets, and shall be updated annually. The expenditure projection shall be approved by the Joint Management Committee. B. Invoiced amounts shall adhere as close as possible to the expenditure projection for the invoice month. OCSD shall provide advance notice to SAWPA as soon as possible after leaming of any actual or expected major deviation in the expenditure projection. C. Invoices shall be in a format mutually agreeable to OCSD's and SAWPA's staff, and shall include complete back-up documentation for all services. A monthly report of all activities performed shall be provided. D. OCSD shall certify that the invoiced work was received and conforms to the contract requirements. E. OCSD shall invoice SAWPA for its pro-rata share of the project costs. SAWPA shall review said invoices for completeness and accuracy within seven 7 calendar days of receipt. Incomplete or inaccurate invoices will be returned for correction without obligation to pay until corrected. Upon acceptance of the invoice as complete and accurate, SAWPA will pay within thirty (30) calendar days. Invoices not paid by the due date shall bear interest at seven percent (7%) per annum from such due date. 10. Staff Time and Expense. The Parties recognize that considerable staff effort and time has been and will continue to be expended throughout the term of the ultimate project. SAWPA and OCSD shall each be entitled to submit their respective claims for reimbursement of such expense based upon the actual cost of salary and benefits for each employee or consultant, multiplied by the recorded timekeeping hours of each individual. The costs shall be proportionally shared as recommended by the Joint Management Committee, subject to the approval of the OCSD and SAWPA governing Boards. 11. Audit. SAWPA shall have the right, at its sole expense, to audit all OCSD records related to SARI activities. OCSD shall provide full and complete access to all documents. 12. Arbitration. Any unresolved dispute under this Memorandum of Understanding shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to Covenant 15 of the Agreement. 13. Counterparts. This Memorandum of Understanding may be signed in counterparts. WSBS-TLW:pI:D-1S:02/27/02A14S219 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have affixed their signatures as of the day and year first above written. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT By Chair, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY By Chairman of the Commission By Secretary of the Commission WSBS-TLW:p1D-18=7/02414 219 6 N 1 orange Co. San Semarmro Co. I �" Riverdtle Co. } I Exhibit A Protection, Repair, and/ as as a. or Relocation of a Portion of the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor ppepM&rrwtii�btibgWOr eqr MMMWFR SSE PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.oI Dir. 03/07/02 03/27/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDO02-14 13(g) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Engineer SUBJECT: INTERIM STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE, JOB NO. J-40-8 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$247,610 for Interim Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J-40-8, for a total project budget of$687,610; and (2)Approve Addendum No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee for additional engineering services for Interim Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J-40-8,for an additional amount of $247,610, increasing the total amount not to exceed$597,340. SUMMARY • Since adoption of the Strategic Plan in 1999, significant developments have taken place that will impact the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)operations such as: bans on land application of Class"B" biosolids, persistent beach warnings and closures, urban runoff diversions to sanitary sewers, final design of the Groundwater Replenishment System, lower than projected wastewater flows, elevated influent ammonia concentrations, and most recently ouffall plume excursions. • These changes require that the District revisit the 1999 Strategic Plan to provide the Board of Directors, the Public, and Staff with new information to help us make decisions about our Ocean Discharge Permit application in 2002. • Due to the short timeframe available to perform the update and to keep continuity with the Strategic Plan, Staff hired Camp Dresser and McKee on a sole source basis to prepare the update. The Professional Services Agreement(PSA)was estimated at$350,000 and the Board of Directors authorized the execution of the Contract, but the final scope and fee had not been negotiated. • As of this date, a final scope and fee have been negotiated. The number of treatment alternative scenarios anticipated for the work has increased from two to four. The number of facility treatment alternatives anticipated for the work has increased from 9 to 22. The number of Capital Improvement Programs, and Rate Analyses to be prepared have each increased from one to four. • Also, there are a two areas in the existing Strategic Plan facility cost model, that need to be significantly revised to track scenario impacts and costs. These include adding odor control management to the volatile organic compound control (VOC) control cost model and adding truck hauling impacts to the biosolids cost model. • Staff recommends the additional work be completed to better inform the Board of Directors on the impacts, that the level of treatment decision will have on the rate payers and the environment. • The additional analysis by Camp Dresser and McKee for the Interim Strategic Plan Update will increase the not to exceed fee amount by$349,730 to a total of$597,340. 1 • The budget also requires an amendment of$247,610 to match the proposed Consultant fee. 1i PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total proposed budget for the Interim Strategic Plan Update, Job No. J-40-8, is $687,610. Authorization of$247,610. from the Consultant Professional Services Agreement(PSA)is being requested. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Approved by the Board of Directors on 10124/01.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Under"Proposed Budget Increase," an additional $247,610 is being requested to adjust the budget for the additional consulting services for Job No. J-40-8, to a total of$687,610. The proposed source of funding is from the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Capital Improvement Reserves. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The proposed Interim Strategic Plan Update will develop updated Capital Improvement Program (CIP) information, and will provide projected operational costs and fees for our various user categories. The draft update needs to be completed by April 2002, to be useful in decision making for our Ocean Discharge Permit (NPDES Permit)application. It is Staffs intention to follow the interim update with another, more comprehensive, Strategic Plan update. That update would address changes such as service area development and demographics, and the application of new technologies for secondary treatment alternatives, odor control, disinfection and solids management. ALTERNATIVES Do not develop the update. Under this alternative,we would be forced to rely on the existing Strategic Plan analysis. Significant changes have occurred since 1999, these changes would not be available for consideration by the Board when it decides on our Ocean Discharge Permit application in 2002. CEQA FINDINGS The recommended action is for conducting planning-level engineering and financial studies, and does not require CEQA documentation. Should a decision be made to proceed with an alternative other than the Certified 1999 Strategic Plan and the 1989 Master Plan preferred alternatives,further CEQA analysis may be required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report DAL:JB:jo:sa Giwp.dtatagendataoard Agenda Reponst2002 Boats Agenda Repa1s1030Nwn 13(g)J40-8.doc 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE INTERIM STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE JOB NO. J-40-8 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlrASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASFJ BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) DECREASE Project Development $ S $ Studies/Permitting $ - $ $ 5 $ - $ 0% Consultant PSA $ 350,000 1 $ 350,000 $ 247,610 $ 597.610 $ 349,730 $ 247,610 $ 597,340 1 $ 0% Design Staff $ 80,000 $ 80.000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 0% Constriction Contract $ $ $ 6 $ $ 0% Construction Administration $ $ $ $ $ $ 0% Constmction Inspection $ - $ $ $ $ - $ 0% Contingency $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 440,000 $ 440.000 $ 247,610 $ 687.610 $ 429.730 $ 247.610 1 $ 677,340 1 $ 0% Reimbursable Coals $ _ $ $ _ g 0% PROJECT NET $ 440,000 1 $ 440,000 1 $ 247,610 $ 687.610 1 $ 429,730 $ 247.610 $ 677,340 1 $ 0% G:\wp.dta\eng\720\Burror\[J-40-8 BIT 2-26-01.x1s]Districts h ays dlateng,roarre budge)table Form Revised Oct.a.2000 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Interim Strategic Plan Update Job No. J-40-8 Total Proposed Project Budget: $687,610 Consultant: Camp, Dresser and McKee Start Date of Project: September 6, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 10/24/01 Original Professional services for the preparation of the $349,730 $349,730 PSA Interim Strategic Plan Update Additional services for the preparation of the Interim Strategic Plan Update including: 1.) 2 more treatment scenario alternatives Pending #1 2.) 13 more facility treatment alternatives 3.) 3 more Capital Improvement Programs $247,610 $597,340 4.) 3 more Rate Analyses 5.) Update two areas in the existing Strategic Plan facility cost model. GAwp.dta%n9V20taumN40-6 PSA Status Report 2-26-02.tlec 02/27/02 ReAse005114W PDC COMMITTEE Meeling Date To Bd.of Dir. 03/07/02 03/27/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCO2-15 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, JOB NO. J-40-5 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve a budget amendment of$139,170 for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J40-5, for a total project budget of$287,170; and (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates for additional environmental services for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J-40-5, for an additional amount of$116,170, increasing the total amount not to exceed $194,000. SUMMARY • In March 2001, Environmental Science Associates (ESA)was awarded the Professional Services Agreement(PSA)to prepare Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (SEIR)for three projects: (1)Area Classification Study, Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 & 2, Job No. J-35-2; (2) Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77; and (3) Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-66. • Staff is requesting a modification to the PSA to address several upcoming projects that will require additional environmental documentation as a result of(1) preliminary design reports, (2) ongoing engineering project modifications, (3) project impacts briefly described or not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report, and (4) projects impacts unknown or envisioned by Staff at the time the PSA was prepared. • Staff is proposing that ESA perform the required additional environmental analysis and documentation necessary to address new and revised collection system and treatment plant projects in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for fiscal year 2001-02 through FY 2002-2003. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY As indicated in the attached Budget Information Table, authorization of$116,170 is requested for the proposed PSA, an additional $20,000 for Staff and material costs, and an additional $3,000 for contingency, for a total project budget of$287,170. Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds (Line item: Miscellaneous&Support Projects,Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan, Section 8- Page 171) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Under"Proposed Budget Increase," $139,170 is being requested for additional environmental documentation and support services for ongoing projects and completion of Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J-40-5. The proposed total budget would increase to $287,170. The proposed source of funding is from the Orange County Sanitation District (District) Capital Improvement Reserve Funds. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In November 2001, Staff directed ESA to use a portion of their existing PSA, originally budgeted and earmarked for other projects,to prepare environmental documentation for four different projects as requested by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ESA has prepared environmental documentation for the following projects: (1) Rehabilitation of 14'n Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51; (2) Landscape and Irrigation at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-84; (3) Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4; and (4)Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22. The environmental documentation for these projects was received and filed at the District's December 2001 Board Meeting. New or revised projects that require environmental work beyond December 2003 will be considered during the Strategic Plan Update environmental review process, or be prepared under a separate contract. ALTERNATIVES None. The environmental documentation (i.e., Supplement, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Addenda, etc.) for these projects is required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA FINDINGS The 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR was certified by the District Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. Addendum No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR and the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)was filed with the State Clearinghouse on March 28, 2001. Addenda Nos. 2, 3, and 4 have been retained in the District's official files for internal reference. The Notice of Exemption for the Area w W:MWt Page 2 v Classification Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 was filed with the County of Orange on November 30, 2001, and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Rehabilitation of 14" Street Pump Station was fled with the State Clearinghouse on December 20, 2001. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Proposal letter from Environmental Science Associates, dated January 25, 2002. AA:sa Gtlwp.dtakagendaMoard Agenda Reports12002 Board Agenda Rep ts\0302\Itenn 13(h).J40-5.doc R.�. So", Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report JOB NO. J-40-5 ORIGINAL • CURRENT, PROP.OSED7 4PROPOSED t FUND8 I .'srg THI8 s tPRQP(fSED ESTIMATED �ESBJ10 ' 1;)k PR ECT(f " 1AUTHORCgD PROJECT:' ' BUDGET I REVISBD a 'AUTHbf&9D AUTHOWL�TION? _ jofA t 'EXPENDITURE 1=J(aFtiHDEgd BUDGET. BUDGET,' INCREASEk_BUDOET , �TO DATEREL111 $T7 JUITHORIZftTIi1N TObATE TO DATE(ib) Project Development Studies/Permitting $ 20,170 $ 20,170 $20,170 $ 20,170 Is 20,170 Consultant PSA $ 77.830 $ 77,830 $ 116.170 $194.000 1 $ 77,830 $116.170 $194,000 $ 38,000 49% Design Staff $ 44.000 $ 44,000 $ 20,000 $64,000 $ 44,000 $20.000 $64,000 $ 14.000 32% Construction Contract Construction Administration Construction Inspection LContattlency $ 6.000 1 $ 6,0001 $3.0001 $9,000 $6,000 $3,000 1 $0,000 PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 148,000 1 $ 148.000 1 $ 139,170 $ 287,170 $ 148.000 $ 139,170 $ 287.170 $ 52,000 35% Relmbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 148,000 $ 148,000 $ 139,170 $ 287.170 11 $ 146,000 1 $ 139,170 $ 287,170 $ 52,000 35% -$80,000 of the total contract amount will be charged to vadous collection system projects.(i.e.,Contract Nos.3-52,5-49,5-50,5-52,5-53,5-54,and 11-28). G:tw x4Aengt)2fterdenis120010R RalaledInfo11JJ0.5 Budget Info Table for Addenda 1.AslDisldcls Professional Services Agreement Status Report Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Job No. J-40-5 Total Project Budget: $148,000 Consultant: Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Start Date of Project: March 28, 2001 DATE ADDENDUM DESCPRIPTION COST ACCUMULATED COSTS 3/2/01 Original PSA Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program $77,830 $77,830 Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). The work is to support additional environmental documentation projects under design or were not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR analysis. Proposed 1 To address upcoming collection system and treatment $116,170 $194,000 plant projects that require additional environmental analysis and documentation to supplement the Strategic Plan EIR. A budget increase is also required for FY 2001- 02 through FY 2002-03. %UeadWaWl\wp.dWWng1720UrerdanisUW1%EIR Related InfoWSA Slalus Repor J-00-5 Addenda 1.doc 02/14/02 Revised 05/1 AIM J January 25,2002 Angie Anderson Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728 Re: Contract Modification to Job No.1-40-5 Dear Angie: This letter summarizes tasks to be completed or already completed by Environmental Science Associates (ESA)for the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD). The work already completed has been authorized under contract No.J40-5. This contract specified three elements including: 1)the Area Classification Study Implementation Plan for Plant Nos. 1 &2,lob No.J-35;2)Effluent Pump Station Annex,Job No.J- 77;and 3)Supplemental EIR for the Headworks Improvements at Plant No.2,lob No.P2-66 in the amount of$77,830.00. The Headworks Improvement Project originally described in this contract has been postponed. As a result,the District's more pressing CEQA needs have been conducted under this contract. Based on meetings with the OCSD and its sub-consultants,OCSD's CEQA compliance needs were outlined. The following tasks were identified: Task 1. Notice of Exemption for Area Classification(completed) Task 2. Addendum for Landscape Plan(Pamela Koester)(completed) Task 3. Addendum for Bushard Trunk Sewer(Larry Rein)(completed) Task 4. Addendum for Warner Avenue Sewer(completed) Task 5. Negative Declaration for 14' Street Pump Station(William Cassidy)(completed) Task 6. Negative Declaration for A-Street Pump Station(William Cassidy)(Summer 2002) Task 7. Negative Declaration for Binerpoint Pump Station(William Cassidy)(Summer(2002) Task S. Negative Declaration for Edinger Pump Station(William Cassidy)(Summer 2002) Task 9. Negative Declaration for Rocky Point Pump Station(William Cassidy)(Summer 2002) Task 10. Exemption for 3 pump stations(William Cassidy)(Summer 2002) Task 11. Supplemental EIR for the E(Fluent Pump Station(2002-2003) Task 12. Supplemental EIR for the Headworks Improvement project(2003-204) The following is the scope of work for each task completed by ESA. Task 1.—Implementation of the Area Classification project was determined to be exempt from CEQA. Therefore,a Notice of Exemption was prepared. Task 2.—The Landscape Plan project was slightly modified since the certification of the Program EIR.As part of the revised landscape plan,the nine existing palm trees on the west-side of the site will be removed to eliminate raptor perches. The CDFG expressed interest in removing the existing palm trees to eliminate perches for birds of prey near the coastal marshes. This would provide additional protection for special status bird species that utilize the marsh. This modification was not considered to be a major revision of the project requiring the preparation of a Subsequent EIR. Therefore,pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines,ESA prepared an Addendum to the Program EIR, identifying this modification. v Task 3.—The Bushard Trunk Sewer Replacement project was modified slightly since the certification of the Program EIR. The proposed pipe will be slightly smaller than the 120-inch diameter pipeline originally described in the PEIR. Also,it was determined that the sewer could not be replaced using jack and bore methods due to the shallow pipe depth as originally described in the Program EIR. This modification was not considered to be a major revision of the project requiring the preparation of a Subsequent EIR. Therefore,pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, ESA prepared an Addendum to the Program EIR,identifying this modification. Task 4.—The Warner Sewer Replacement project was modified slightly since the certification of the Program EIR. The portion of Warner Avenue in which the sewer will be repaired was not identified in the Program EIR. This modification was not considered to be a major revision of the project requiring the preparation of a Subsequent EIR. Therefore,pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines,ESA prepared an Addendum to the Program EIR,identifying this modification. Task 5.—An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declination,in compliance with CEQA,was prepared for the 10 Street Pump Station Rehabilitation Project. The project involves the replacement of the existing 14'Street Pump Station with a new pump station to be located approximately 650 feet from the existing location. The rehabilitation of the 14'Street Pump Station was not discussed in the Program EIR and therefore,an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Task 6.—An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration is needed for the A-Street Pump Station project. The proposed project will involve excavation,construction,demolition,and possible lane closures. The proposed modifications to the A-Street Pump Station were not discussed in the Program EIR and therefore,in order to comply with CEQA,a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared. Task 7.—The construction of the Bitterpoint Pump Station will involve excavation,and construction activities that will increase pump capacity by 60%. The proposed project has been modified since the certification of the Program EIR. In order to comply with CEQA,and Initial Study will be conducted and a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared. Task 8.—The Edinger Pump Station project will consist of the replacement of pumps and pipes. The project will include the construction of a new underground vault,requiring excavation. In addition,the capacity of the pumps will be increased from their current capacity. Since the project has been modified since the certification of the Program EIR,an Initial Study will be conducted and a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared in order to comply with CEQA. Task 9.—The Rocky Point Pump Station will require compliance of CEQA and therefore a Negative Declaration will be prepared. Because the project is located within the city limits of Newport Beach,coordination will be required with the City. Task 10.—Three pump stations—Bay Bridge Pump Station,Crystal Cove Pump Station,and West Side Pump Station have been determined to be exempt from CEQA,therefore a Notice of Exemption will be prepared. Task I 1 —The Effluent Pump Station Annex,will require the preparation of a Supplemental EIR due to the change of location of the proposed pump station and due to the size of the project. The necessary CEQA documentation needs to be completed by September 2002. Task 12—The Headworks Improvement Project Supplemental EIR was originally planned for completion this year. However,the schedule was postponed. As a result,the contract covering the completion of the SEIR was used to prepare the District's more pressing CEQA needs. The Headworks Improvement Project SEIR is currently anticipated for completion in 2003. The following is a draft cost estimate for each task. These draft estimates are subject to review and modification by ESA and OCSD staff. Project Cost Estimate Accrued Remaining ($) Costs to Date Amount ($) Needed to Complete Task($) 1. Exemption for Area Classification 2,000 2,000 0 2. Addendum for Landscaping Plan 8,000 8,000 0 3. Addendum for Bushard Trunk Sewer 8,000 8,000 0 4. Addendum for Warner Avenue Sewer 8,000 8,000 0 5. Negative Declaration for 14 Street Pump Station 12,000 12,000 0 6. Negative Declaration for A-Street Pump Station 12,000 0 12,000 7. Negative Declaration for Bitterpoint Pump Station 12,000 0 12,000 8. Negative Declaration for Edinger Pump Station 12,000 0 12,000 9. Negative Declaration for Rocky Point Pump Station 15,000 0 15,000 10. Exemption for 3 pump stations 5,000 0 59000 11. Supplemental EIR for Effluent Pump Station 50,000 0 50,000 12. Supplemental EIR for Headworks Improvements 50,000 0 50,000 Total 194,000 38,000 156,000 ESA has accrued costs of$38,000 to date against the total contract amount of$77,830. Therefore, contract 3-40.5 has approximately $39,830 remaining. The contract requires modification to reflect the new tasks. We look forward to meeting with you to update the contract. Sincerely, Tom Bames Project Manager PDC COMMITTEE Mee0ry0ate To ad.Of Du. 03/07/02 03/27/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDCO2-16 13(p Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALLS, JOB NO. J-39, ADDENDUM NO. 8 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No.J-39, providing for additional engineering services in the amount of$652,137 for a total amount not to exceed $1,619,118. SUMMARY • Placement of additional larger rock along approximately one mile of the 120-inch ocean outfall is needed in order to bring the existing structure up to current engineering standards. • Job No. J-39 will re-rock approximately one mile of the 120-inch ouffall, repair the 120-inch outfall scour pad, and repair some minor undercutting on the 78-inch outfall. • The plans and specifications were completed by Carollo Engineers in December 2001. Sealed bids were received on January 22, 2002. The Board awarded the Construction Contract to Connolly-Pacific on February 27, 2002. • Staff has determined that additional engineering and specialty inspection services will be required during the construction and close-out periods. • This Addendum includes the following highly specialized Support Services: construction project management, additional underwater survey work needed before and after rock ballast placement, ballast testing to verify conformance with the specifications, permit assistance, and development of a contingency plan prior to rock placement, as described in the attached proposal letter from Carollo Engineers. • District's staff has negotiated with Carollo Engineers for additional engineering and inspection services needed during construction, and find the fee proposal letter, dated February 1, 2002 reasonable for the construction support services needed to complete this project. Staff recommends Carollo Engineers for the following reasons: - Carollo Engineers conducted the original design - Carollo Engineers has been extensively involved in past surveying efforts - Carollo Engineers has been extensively involved in physical testing - Carollo Engineers has been involved in recent ouffall inspection and repair - Carollo Engineers completed the design work - Districts staff have been very satisfied with Carollo's previous work RWW: 1 m Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$652,137 for construction support services is being requested. A transfer of $500,000 from Construction Inspection to Consultant Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is also being requested. The overall budget is not increased. Please see the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT The total budget for this project will remain unchanged at$16,907,000. The money for this project was approved by the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Board of Directors through a budget amendment at the August 23, 2000 Board Meeting. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Section 8 Page 86) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This Rem has not been budgeted for FY01-02. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District's Strategic Plan places special emphasis on use of the existing 120-inch ocean outfall. All disposal alternatives developed in the Strategic Plan rely on the 120-inch ocean outfall as the primary means to discharge treated wastewater flows through 2020. Consequently, the existing 120-inch ocean outfall must provide the highest degree of reliability possible. Where the outfall lies on the ocean floor, it is held in place and protected from wave action and currents by a rock ballast protective cap. Based on recent engineering analyses, over the next five years,there is a one-in-four chance that the existing ouffall ballast could be significantly affected by large waves generated by storms. Rock ballast is the only protection preventing movement, undermining, and the potential failure of the outfall. Schedule The placement of Ballast rock will begin in July and construction will conclude in December 2002. ALTERNATIVES Physical wave tank modeling has confirmed the need of this project to bring the District's 120- inch ocean ouffall structure up to current engineering design standards. Alternatives to this re- ballast project would expose the District to an unacceptable level of risk. CEQA FINDINGS In accordance with Section 15302 of Article 19, of the California Environmental Quality Act,this project is categorically exempt from the preparation of environmental documentation. A Notice of Exemption was filed at the County Clerk's Office in October 2001. e ...: 11� Page 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Letter from Carollo Engineers, dated February 01,2002 CJH:sa:jo GlnlglabaKAgenda Draft Reyorts%PDGW-39 Add R0-032702.dm Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls JOB NO. J-39 t ? ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED - PROPOSED FUNDS ° THIS PROPOSED" ESTIMATED EST�MATED', PROdECTRASK" AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED '' AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL" - EXPENDITURE EXIT NDi:D`. BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)' Project Development $ 108,000 $ 109.000 $ - $ 109,000 $ 108,000 $ - $ 108,000 $ 108,000 100% Studies/Permitting $ - $ 662,000 $ - $ 662,000 $ - $ - $ - $ Consultant PSA It 414,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,700,000 $ 966,981 $ 652,137 $ 1.619.118 It 770.000 48% Design Staff $ 253.000 $ 362,000 $ - $ 362,000 $ 294,000 $ - $ 294,000 $ 154.000 52% Construction Contract $ 450.000 $ 11.367.000 $ - $ 11.367.000 $ 4,961,407 $ - $ 4,961,407 $ 88,407 Construction Administration $ - $ 540,000 $ . $ 540,000 $ - $ - $ - $ Construction Ins action $ . $ 667,000 $ 500,000 $ 167.000 $ 24,000 $ - $ 24,000 $ 24,000 100% Contin en $ - 1 $ 2.000.000 $ . $ 2.000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 1.225.000 $ 16.907.000 $ - $ 16,907,000 $ 6,354,388 $ 652,137 $ 7,006,525 1 $ 1,144,407 16% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 1,225,000 1 $ 16,907,000 $ - I $ 16,907,000 11 $ 6.354.388 $ 652,137 $ 7.006,525 1 $ 1,144,407 1 16% EI3M310oc Class lassN mpMWJob6u4geMudge1Inlm,agm Tab (W3717 ) Ci Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-39 Investigation and Repair— Ocean Outfalls Total Project Budget: $16,907,000 Consultant:: Carollo Engineers, Inc. Start Date of Project: March 1996 Date Addendum Description cost Accumulated Costs Original 3127/96 PSA Investigation and minor repair to ocean ouffalls $433.200 $433,260 10/22/97 1 Rewrite ocean dive contracts and assist staff in testing the 78-inch outfall $38,310 $471,570 4106/98 2 Prepare plans and detailed specifications for endgate repair $23.090 $494,660 8101/98 3 Provide assistance during bid&construction of endgate repair $21.770 $516,430 3115/99 4 Provides engineering services(Wave Tank Modeling)needed to refine $109.860 $626.290 recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to re-ballast the 120-inch ocean outfall 1011/99 5 Revise the cost allocation by line item to cover additional costs incurred by $0 $626,290 Carollo Engineers. 11/17/99 6 Provide engineering services to conduct additional wave tank modeling $57,764 $684,054 needed to refine recommended ballast specification and cost estimates to re-ballast the 120-inch ocean outfall 01/15/01 7 Provide engineering services necessary to prepare plans and $282,927 $966,981 specifications needed to re-rock approximately one mile of the 120-inch outfall, repair the 120-ion outfall scour pad,and repair the 78-inch outfall wye structure. Pending 8 Provide additional engineering services necessary for construction support $652,137 $1,619.118 services including specialty inspection services, project management during construction, preparation of a contingency plan, permitting . assistance, additional diving and survey work. \eeadWaWlWp.dtalenglnO%bodgeLL39%PSA statue report-keaeM m a9.dm _u caro��o February 1, 2002 300.20.650 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: Mr. David Ludwin Subject: Construction Management Services- Proposal Ocean Ouffall Re-Ballast Project,Job No.J-39 Dear Mr. Ludwin: As requested in your letter of January 9, 2002, Carollo Engineers (Carollo)is pleased to offer this amended proposal to provide construction management services for the Ocean Ouffall Re-Ballast Project,J•39. Our Scope of Work, as requested by your letter, provides full-time construction management services during the manufacturing and placement of the 120-inch outfall ballast.We will also provide inspection on the placement of the endgate scour pad and the stabilization of the Wye structure on the 78-inch outfall. The attached Scope of Services amends our Scope and Time of Services presented in our letter of January 21, 2002. Bids were taken on January 22,2002, and Connolly Pacific, Inc. (Connolly)was the low bidder. If they are awarded the contract, Carollo can offer a time of service that matches their proposed accelerated construction schedule, therefore reducing our costs.We understand that Connolly proposes to complete the project in August 2002. Final record drawing and mapping activities would take place during September and October 2002. Also, the Contractor proposes to produce the ballast at a local quarry on Catalina Island. Therefore we propose to reduce our quarry inspection efforts to two days per week and to reduce the travel expenses accordingly. Our Scope also Includes development of standard operating procedures for flow diversions tl the 120-inch outtall becomes fully or partially unusable during the ballast placement. These procedures will be based on the Contingency Plan that was assembled by Carollo in the summer of 2001. Carollo realizes the importance of permitting and public information to this project.We propose an optional service to assist you in the ongoing permit monitoring and reporting process work with your public relations department in assembling and presenting materials to the public. 0=IN 0ce0 5AWnCWrWM307A2P UMn02.ft o,nn nn,ITu ueYnnn nnin Lveon 4111TO 90n . MaRTA eue nAl,9nnu,A opine . nu, KMAInn . fev nu\ 91nd110 Mr. David Ludwin Orange County Sanitation District February 1, 2002 Page 2 C The detailed breakdown of the services to be provided are included in the attached Exhibits listed below: 1. Exhibit A - Scope Of Work. 2. Exhibit B - Estimated Work Effort. 3. Exhibit C - Estimated Costs. 4. Exhibit D - Direct Labor Schedule. 5. Exhibit E - Estimated Carollo Hour Distribution. 6. Exhibit F - Other Direct Costs. 7. Exhibit G - Approximate Fee Break Down By Tasks. These Exhibits were developed based on the project contract documents and a construction schedule which begins in April 2002 and is completed in August 2002.The final survey and record drawing work would be completed during September and October 2002. If the Contractor is delayed beyond this schedule, and OCSD requires continued services, an additional Task Order will be required to authorize additional inspection and Project Management services. Our budget estimate includes pre-construction and post-construction surveys of the outfall ballast. Limited diving services for spot inspection of the ouffall pipe and cross section confirmation are also included. Once you have had an opportunity to review this proposal, please contact us to discuss any questions, comments, or revisions.We took forward to working with the District on this important project. Sincerely, CARD LO ENGINEER , P.C. ^� Wl• n G. H g 4Du e , P.E. rin al E n r SGH:DRJ:jrb Enclosures: Exhibits A through F cc: Mr. John Linder, Construction Manager OCSD,w/enclosures Mr. Chris Cervelone, Construction Administrator OCSD,w/enclosures Mr. Chuck Hodge, Project Engineer OCSD, w/enclosures H�UENTOCSD_SAOMCONTAACrN3 MMLUDWIN ,DDC EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES AGREEMENTFOR SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OCEAN OUTFALL REBALLAST PROJECT PROJECT NO. J-39 1. BACKGROUND The Orange County Sanitation District(DISTRICT) has identified the need to add ballast to a portion of the 120-inch Ocean Outfall (Outfall No. 2), replace the endgate scour pad on Outfall No. 2, and add stabilization to the Wye structure on the 78-Inch Outfall (Outfall No. 1). The project, entitled Ocean Ouffall Reballast, Project No. J-39(PROJECT) was initiated and the design has been completed. The construction documents were prepared during 2001 and bid opening took place on January 22, 2002. Services will begin in March 2002 and continue until the scheduled completion (August 2002)with Record Drawings being completed during September 2002 and October 2002. 2. PURPOSE The purpose of Exhibit A is to establish the Scope of Work, Schedule,and the budget and payment provisions for the Services During Construction. 3. SCOPE OF WORK This Scope of Work identifies the tasks to be completed during the Services During Construction portion of the PROJECT. More specifically detailed in the following: Task 1 — Construction Support Services A. Prolect Management Activities During Construction: 1. Protect Administration: Carollo Engineers (Carollo) will provide overall construction management administration. Carollo's Principal-In-Charge (PIC)will be responsible for making appropriate staff assignments, including the provision of project administration for both office services and field services.The PIC will monitor the construction services effort for conformance with the PROJECT intent and provide engineering and management overview. n:�cueonasd-snowkcom.nwwa20�c st$.H,.:s .".a A-1 D 2. Proiect Management: Carollo will provide a full-time Field Project Manager(FPM)and a part-time Office Project Manager(OPM) a) The FPM will coordinate with the Contractor, the project Inspectors, the DISTRICT's Construction Management Group, and the design and office support team. In addition, the FPM will be the point of contact with the DISTRICT for project status reviews, Contractor payment requests,and project communications. b) Carollo's office support team will include part-time Office project Manager(OPM)to coordinate project needs in the office.The OPM will work with the respective discipline (civil, structural) members of the project design team.They will assign work to the appropriate engineer,assign a due date, and monitor status of submittals and other project correspondence. B. Pre-Construction Survey: The following additional survey work is needed to verity the existing conditions prior to re- rock commencement: 1. Thales GeoSolutions (Pacific), Inc. (Thales)will be retained by Carollo as a subconsultant to update their 1998 survey data and to determine if the conditions of that survey, shown in the Contract Documents and used to generate the cross sections, still apply. 2. Based on the results of these surveys, Carollo will update the cross sections if required. C. Specialty Inspection and Testing Services: Carollo will monitor the ballast manufacturing process on a part-time basis. In addition to providing reports of inspections and observations, Carollo will collect small samples and deliver them to the testing firm of Converse Consultants for analysis. Three months of part- time (two days per week) inspection of the ballast manufacturing is included. D. Specialty Marine Inspection (MI) Services Required During the Ballast Placement Period: Carollo will provide a full-time MI for the period of the ballast placement for up to 4 months in duration, 6 days per week, and 12 hours per day. Carollo will also inspect Wye structure encasement stabilization and andgate scour pad placements. The Inspector's office will be aboard the Contractor's placement barge. E. Additional Survey Work: Carollo will subconsult with Severts Undersea Graphics(Severts)for additional dive services and/or survey work needed to verify ballast placement, the adequate repair of the 120-inch Outtall scour pad, and the adequate repair of the 78-Inch Wye structure following completion of construction. If necessary, Severts will provide divers and video which will be recorded by submarine in order to verity the Contractor's rock placement. Additionally, Severts will record the andgate scour pad and the Wye stabilization structure inspections. Diving and submarine Inspection will be provided for a period of up to 4 days. F. Additional Specialty Services (Subconsultants) Required During Construction: The services of Dr. Raichlen of Cal Tech will be available for consultation, if needed. M1CiienA s SAOMC m..lWW7A2NConSISenices5coMd- A-2 . G. Coordination of all Shop Drawino Submittal Reviews: Carollo will review shop drawings and submittals as required in the Contract Documents. Review procedures will be as specified in the Contract Documents. Shop drawings will be reviewed by Carollo for conformance with the design documents.This review does not relieve the Contractor from specification requirements. Contractor is expected to provide complete submittals. Carollo's budget estimate allows for an initial review and one resubmittal for each submittal. Time spent reviewing second resubmittals will be tracked and backcharged to the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents. All submittals will be reviewed and returned within 15 days, unless the submittal is unusually large or complex. Carollo will notify the Contractor and the DISTRICT if additional review time is required. Expedition software will be used for submittal tracking and submittal reviews in accordance with the DISTRICTS standard practice. H. Preparation of Responses to Requests for Information (RFIs): Carollo will respond to RFIs issued by the Contractor. Copies of the Contractor's RFIs and Carollo's response will be returned to the DISTRICT and the Contractor. RFIs will be tracked and processed with Expedition. I. Preparation of Responses to Requests for Clarification (RFCs): Carollo will respond to RFCs. Copies of the Contractor's RFCs and Carollo's response will be provided to the DISTRICT and the Contractor. RFCs will be tracked and processed with Expedition. J. Plan Change Preparation: Carollo will prepare plan change documents for DISTRICT-requested changes and differing site conditions.These plan changes are the precursors to Change Orders, and will be made a part of the Contract Documents. Plan changes will be tracked and processed with Expedition, if desired. Up to 10 plan changes are included. K. Review of Lab Reports, Certifications, Material Testinn , and Inspection: Carollo will review lab reports,certifications, materials testing reports, and inspection reports submitted by the Contractor or other independent laboratories to verify compliance of materials with the Contract Documents. Carollo will provide the services of Converse Consultants for verification testing. L. Manage Coordinate and Document Weekly Progress Meetings: Carollo will prepare meeting agendas, conduct the meetings, and provide minutes for the pre-construction conference and weekly project meetings, as called for in the Contract Documents. Design and inspection staff will attend selected meetings as required to address issues of construction. In addition to tracking regular construction progress and issues, the following subjects will be addressed at each meeting until they are complete: 1. Review of permit conditions and compliance. 2. Rock manufacturer requirements. 3. Ballast placement. H;1CWnA sit SOMConu cMW7AMonSiServias pB.dw A-3 0 4. Endgate scour pad placement on Outtall No.2. ' 5. Wye structure stabilization on Outfall No. 1. 6. Submittal review status. 7. RFI status. 8. Change Order status. 9. Schedule updates. M. Prepare Formal Revisions to Contract Documents: Refer to Section 3.J. (above)and Section 3.Q. (below) of this document. N. Prepare Formal Change Orders. Review of Change Order Proposals (COPS): Carollo will provide engineering support in review of COPs submitted by the Contractor. The reviews will include: 1. Evaluation of the impact of Change Orders on design intent. 2. Calculations and sketches as required to facilitate evaluations. 3. Independent estimate of cost. 4. Review of impacts on the schedule and budget. 5. Reports. 6. Tables. 7. Board agenda reports. O. Monthly Proiect Progress Reports: Carollo will prepare and submit monthly project progress reports to the DISTRICT.The reports will include monthly schedule updates, project progress to-date, a report on submittals and tests reviewed, and RFIs and/or RFCs reviewed and answered. A project status Summary and Construction Activities Planned for the following month will also be included with these reports. P. Negotiation and Preparation of Monthly Contractor Progress Payments: Carollo will review monthly progress payment requests from the Contractor. Carollo will compare these requests with the approved progress on the PROJECT, and the Contractor's approved schedule of values to determine the partial payment based on the provisions in the Specifications. The final amount for each payment will be reviewed with the Contractor, and the finalized payment request will be submitted to the DISTRICT for payment. M.\CIIenfi sE_SAO`MCO ctKW7Am1 nstse mssro .tl A-4 O. Preparation of Record Drawinas: 1. Carollo will prepare monthly updates to the Contract Drawings that incorporate all approved changes. These updates will be recorded on CD-ROM and provided to the Contractor and the DISTRICT. 2. Carollo will prepare final Record Drawings based on information recorded during construction by the Contractor and the post-construction ballast survey. The electronic files will be modified to show the final format of the work and will not reflect the mechanism for the changes(Change Order numbers and other PROJECT changes). Final Record Drawings will be submitted in AutoCAD®2002 format and in accordance with the DISTRICT standards at the time the Contract Drawings were prepared. One set of Record Drawing mylars will be provided. 3. Following the placement of the ballast Thales will prepare a post-construction survey of the final ballast placement. The survey may be used to provide documentation of the ballast placement locations and provide a baseline for future monitoring. The mapping will be based on sonar monitoring and will be spot-checked using diver references.This survey will be scheduled for completion within 30 days following the completion of the work, If weather conditions allow. Task 2 - Outfall Contingency Planning Carollo will develop a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)for the PROJECT. The SOP will contain specific information related to the PROJECT along with applicable elements of the Integrated Emergency Response Plan (IERP), and the High-Flow Emergency Response Plan (HFERP). For example,the suggested Incident Command System appropriate for the various scenarios in the Outfall Contingency Plan will be identified and the notification list will be customized for this PROJECT. Also, instead of using the code names from the HFERP (which are based on specific criteria that will not apply to this contingency), Carollo will develop new code names for the preparation, activation, and reinstatement phases.This approach will allow affected personnel to have all the information located in one document rather than requiring references to several documents. A. Phase I: 1. Carollo will reorganize the current Contingency Plan into as draft DISTRICT SOP. This task will Identify personnel titles responsible for performing speck actions. 2. Carollo will compare the draft SOP against the current version of the HFERP and IERP to Identify any discrepancies. We will hold a meeting with DISTRICT staff to coordinate this effort with the revised HFERP and IERP currently underway. 3. Carollo will hold a second meeting with DISTRICT staff to collect the data as identified in Tasks 1 and 2 including: a) Meet with Operations to identify contacts and phone numbers of key staff involved in the process. 1) Work with the Communications Department to develop a sample press release. 2) Hold a meeting with key contacts and other interested DISTRICT staff and the reballast Contractor's representatives. H1CIIen110c.54SA0 W 1ComracM30]R2(f,Conslsarn�sswpe.tloc A-5 4. Carollo will revise the draft SOP and submit R to the DISTRICT for technical review. t B. Phase It: 1. Following the technical review, Carollo will facilitate a workshop in which DISTRICT staff will provide an in-depth technical and administrative review of the SOP. a) Finalize Rev. 0 of the SOP based on the comments from the workshop. b) Produce and deliver the following: 1) Three sets of reproducible originals. 2) Electronic file for the SOP in Microsoft Word 97. Task 3 - (Optional Services) Permitting Assistance A. Permit Administration and Assistance to DISTRICTs Public Information Department: Carollo will provide permit administration assistance including the coordination of permit applications with the California Coastal Commission (CCC).This work will include the preparation of engineering data for the CCC permit, including the reports and mapping requested during the permitting process. Coordination of submittals of Contractor information, including installation and anchoring plans, descriptions of the results of the Outfall protection shielding demonstration, and coordination of CCC construction monitoring programs. Carollo will also provide assistance to the DISTRICTS Public Information Department for preparation of information and/or assistance at public meetings. Up to 20 hours per month for the construction period will be made available to tracking permit conditions, meeting with permitting agencies, the public, and the DISTRICTS Public Information Department. 4. CONSTRUCTION PERIOD The Scope of Work presented herein covers work-related tasks that will be required for a construction period from April 2002 through August 2002. Should the inspection period be exceeded, an Amendment to this Contract may be required.The DISTRICT and Carollo agree to review the project progress at the mid-point and at 90 percent complete to determine the project schedule status and make an estimate of the effort required to complete the PROJECT. If necessary, an amendment will be negotiated to cover additional cost of a Contract extension. 5. SCHEDULE The budget for this work is based on completing the Scope of Work within the following schedule. These dates are based on a proposed start date of February 27, 2002: Contractor's Notice to Proceed April 1, 2002 Construction Completion Date August 15, 2002 Record Drawings Submittal October 31,2002 HACfieffl c SAO*CiontmcMM7AM0C ,JServices5oap A. A-6 If the Scope of Work is changed or if problems arise, Consultant shall work with the DISTRICT to develop a revised schedule and budget. Impacts to the budget and schedule associated with coordination with other projects or conditions that require PROJECT delays may require a change in scope and budget. & BUDGET The budget estimate reflects completing the work in accordance with the schedule. If significant delays occur in the PROJECT, or if significant changes are requested by DISTRICT staff, it may require some work to be delayed or to be completed out of sequence. The impact on the budget will be negotiated. If the Contractor is delayed or continues work beyond August 2002, and the services of Carollo are required, additional authorization from the DISTRICT will be required. A not-to-exceed budget for Tasks 1 through 3 shall be as follows: Existing Agreement Change Per Amended &Amendments 1-7 Addendum No. 8 Agreement Engineering Servicesr't $624,374 $465.462 $ 1,089,836 Not-To-Exceed Subconsuhant Fees and costs, $281,961 $142,636 $ 424,597 Not-To-Exceed Profit $ 60,646 $ 44,039 $ 104,685 Total Not-To-Exceed $966,981 $652,137 $1,619,118(2) Notes: (1) Direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead. (2) Total compensation allowed under this Agreement shall not exceed$1,619,118 (One Million Six Hundred Nineteen Thousand One Hundred Eighteen dollars). H\GientWcstl SAOVAComacN130]A2J�ConslServiws5cope.Eoc A-7 Exhibit 9 Estimated Work EHmI Construction Management,Inspection and Integrated Emergency Operations Wan Reballast at 1204nch Ocean Cousin Ocean Oetlells - Orange County SmMuldon District Item No. Item Description Total Noun ocsG Corona o_ot -oz p302 pis M93 �3 A3; S4 0y3 yy3 PAS A438943. Total Task 1-Cont. Man.&InsO. AA Protect AEmiMeimll0n 88 0 a 0 0 0 0 24 16 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 A.2 Field Project Manager• 935 0 935 0 0 0 0 170 170 170 170 170 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 936 B Pm-Construction Survey 40 0 40 0 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 C Inspection/Testing Bellasl Mail. 211 0 211 0 0 0 0 n T7 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 211 0 Inspection/Mann 1,152 0 1,152 0 0 0 0 42 314 314 314 169 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,152 E OFrer Services 40 0 40 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 F Special Consultant 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 G Shop Omwing Reviews 90 0 90 0 0 0 0 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 H RFI-Responses 90 0 90 0 0 0 0 26 16 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SO I RFC-Resorts SO 0 s0 0 0 0 0 26 16 16 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SO J Plan Change Preparations 45 0 46 0 0 0 0 9 13 5 5 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 K Lab.Reports,Cedilicmbn,Otc, 66 0 fib 0 0 0 0 16 14 12 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 L Progress Meetings(weekly) 110 0 110 0 0 0 0 SO 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ito M Revision-Change Orders(CO) 90 0 90 0 0 0 0 26 16 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 N CO,Report Tables,goaN Agenda 110 0 110 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 20 ?D 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 O Job Status Reports 4/ 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 8 8 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 P Progress Payments 69 0 66 0 0 0 0 6 12 12 12 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 O Recent Greetings I 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ae SO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IN suburban 3,412 3,412 0 0 0 0 562 782 02 NO 183 166 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,4 22 R Task 2-Standard Op.Proeaeduna(Sops) R.1 Prepare dell SON 120 0 in 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 R.2 Present Great SON 32 0 32 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 R.3 Gather Comments 24 0 24 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 RA Revise SOPS 32 0 32 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 FIS Faclllle SOP Workshop 40 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 RA Pinson SOPS 40 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 R.7 Printing and Reporting 24 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Subtotal 312 0 312 0 0 0 152 fib 80 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 312 Task-3-Additional Suriname S Perm61in9 Assistance(Optional) 190 0 ISO 0 0 0 0 IN 35 17 14 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task 3,Sub-letal ISO 0 in 0 0 0 0 IN 35 17 14 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 Total 3,914 0 3.914 0 0 0 152 722 697 723 659 497 174 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 B14 •Note,that the Field PM me coo(inal9 gems G-0,House listed In 0.0 are suport hams only Exhibit C Estimated Costs Construction Management, Inspection and Integrated Emergency Operations Plan Reballast of 120-inch Ocean Outfall Ocean Outfalls Orange County Sanitation District Direct Labor and Indirect Costs (1) Item Labor Classification Field Staff Support PIC Office PM Manager Engineers Techs staff Total Hours 204 365 935 1,761 297 353 3,915 Direct Labor Rate S56.93 $52.41 $43.11 $38.40 $25.12 $17.35 Direct Labor Cost $11,613 $19,131 $40,311 $67,617 $7,460 $6,123 $152,255 Labor Burden Cost 58.4% $88.917 Total Labor Cost $241,172 Overhead On Labor 93.0/ $224.290 Total Labor and Overhead $465,462 Total Fee 9.46% $44,039 Other Direct Costs Project Equipment&Communication Expense(PECE)Charges $20,233 Travel &Subsistence $11,558 Reproduction &Equipment $4,795 Total Other Direct Costs $36,586 $36,586 Subconsuhants Surveying Pre-Const. $33.600 Surveying, Post Const. $33,600 Geotechnical $9,975 Special Consultation $7,875 Spot Diving $21000 Total Subconsuitants $106,050 $106.050 Total Contract Amount Including Fee $652,137 ConstseN0 M15 n t yypp Exhibit D Direct Labor Schedule Construction Management, Inspection and Integrated Emergency Operations Plan Reballast of 120-inch Ocean Outfall Ocean Ouffalls Orange County Sanitation District eb ( Hourly Rate Enginsers/SelenHata MAI) FJS 1 $ 27.73 US II $ 30.28 FJS III $ 32.82 EIS IV $ 35.43 EIS V $ 37.59 US VI $ 4021 FJS V9 $ 44.61 EIS Vill $ 52.41 Principal $ 56.93 Engineering Aides(EA) EA 1 $ 14.11 FA II $ 16.94 FA III $ 19.76 EA IV $ 22.58 EA V $ 25.40 FA VI $ 27.91 EA VII $ 30.11 Engineering Technicians (ET) ET 1 $ 16.56 ET 11 $ 18.63 ET III $ 20.70 ET IV $ 21.76 ET V $ 24.14 ET VI $ -27.75 ET VII $ 33.58 ET VIII $ 38.49 Support Staff Office Aides $ 9.71 Clerical $ 16.85 Word Processors $ 17.92 Project Equipment and Communication Expenses (PECE) Charge Per Direct Labor Hour $ 5.17 Travel and Subsistence at cost Mileage Charge Per Mile $ 0.355 Subconsultant Cost Other Direct Costs Cost This fee schedule is revised in March and September of every year. consLve .xis D-r yyar Exhlbft E Estimated Carollo Hours Distribution Construction Management,Inspection and Integrated Emergency Operations Plan Reballast of 1204nch Ocean Ouffall Ocean Outfalls Orange County Sanitation District Hem No. Item Description Estimated Cerollo He..Distribution Office Field Staff Support Task 1-Co t- M &Insip, PIC PM Ma,M ger Enolneers Tech. Sleff Total A.1 Pmjoct Administration 88 0 0 0 0 0 88 A.2 Field Project Manager' 0 0 935 0 0 0 935 B Pn,Construction Survey 6 26 0 0 0 8 40 C Inspector,/Testing Ballast Mont. 11 42 0 158 0 0 211 D Inspection/Marine 0 0 0 1152 0 0 1,152 E Diver Services 2 20 0 10 0 8 40 F Special Consultant 1 5 0 2 0 2 10 G Shop Drawing Reviews 0 14 0 50 9 1s 91 H RFl-Responses 0 14 0 50 9 /8 91 1 RFC-Responses 0 14 0 50 9 18 91 J Plan Change Preparations 0 2 0 11 20 11 44 K lab.Reports.Certification,etc. 3 33 0 17 7 6 e6 L Progress Meetings(weekly) 22 0 0 0 0 8a 110 M Revision-Change Orders(CO) 5 0 0 23 45 18 91 N CO,Report Tables,Board Agenda 6 55 0 0 28 22 ill O Job Stets Reports 4 9 0 0 0 W 43 P Progress Payments 13 26 0 13 0 13 65 O Recent Drawings 7 14 0 0 95 20 136 Subtotal(Const.Man.&Insp.) IN 274 935 1,536 222 280 3.415 R Task 2-Standard Op.Procesdures(SOPS) RA Prepare draft SOPS 6 /2 0 48 30 24 12f1 R.2 Present Draft SOPS 2 3 0 13 e 6 32 R.3 Gather Comments 1 2 0 16 0 4 23 RA Revise SOPS 2 3 0 13 8 6 32 Subtotal(Phase l) 11 20 0 9D 46 40 207 R.5 Feciiite SOP Workshop 4 12 0 2D 0 4 d0 R.6 Flnafize SOPs 2 2 0 18 10 8 40 R 7 Printing end Reporting 0 D 0 11 0 12 23 Subtotal (Phase 11) 6 14 0 49 10 24 103 Task2, Subtotal 185 308 935 1,676 276 344 3,725 Task-3-Atltlftlonal Services S PermMing Assistance(Optimal) 19 57 0 86 19 9 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 Task 3,Sub-total 19 57 0 86 19 9 190 Total 204 365 M 1,761 297 353 3,915 cverSBnW.tls E.1 v491 Exhibit F Other Direct Costs Construction Management,Inspection and Integrated Emergency Operations Plan Reballest of 120-Inch Ocean Ouffoli Ocean Outfalls Orange County Sanitation District Number of Sheets: 15 Subitem Subtotal Total w/Cord. 5% SUBCONSULTANTS Surveying Pre•Const. Before Construction Survey $ 32,000 $ 33.600 Surveying,Post Const. After Construction Survey It 32.000 $ 33,600 Geotechnical Ballast Testing,(Converse Consultants) $ 9,500 $ 9,975 Special Consultation Dr. Fred Raichlen $ 7,500 $ 7,875 Spot Diving Sevens $ 20,000 $ 21,0D0 $101,000 $ 106,050 PROJECT EQUIPMENT&COMMUNICATION EXPENSE(PECE)CHARGES PECE Charges 3,914 hours 5.17$/hour $ 20.233 $ 20,233 $ 20,233 TRAVEL Shuttle to Const.Site 14 weeks 2 per week 28 lops 100$/trip $ 2,800 Boat Passage(to Quarry) 0 15 tops 1 dapdp 60$/day $ 9D0 Job Mileage(To dock) 4 mon ® 35 trip/month 20 m91np 0.35 $/mile $ 858 Per diem(Quarry) 15 trips 2 da/tnp 150$/day $ 4,500 Rental Car(Quarry) 28 days 75 S/day $ 1,950 $ 11,008 $ 11,558 REPRODUCTION Draft SOPS 15 copies 10$/copy If 150 Final SOPs 20 copies 25 S/copy $ 500 0 copies 0$/copy $ - 0 copies 0$/copy It - 0 copies 100$/copy $ - Change Order Plans 12 sheets 12 copies 025$/sht 5$/copy $ 180 Draft Record Dwgs 12 Size 90 sheets 5 copies 0.25 S/eht 23$/copy $ 113 Final Record Dwgs 12 Size 15 sheets 5 copies 0.25$/sht 4$/copy $ 19 sheets 0 copies 1.50$/sht 0$/copy $ - Draft Record Dwgs Full Size 15 sheets 2 copies 1.50$/sht 23$/copy $ 45 Final Record Dwgs Full Size 15 sheets 2 copies 1.50 S/sht 23$/copy $ 45 Record Myiars 15 sheets 1 Copies 20$/sht 300$/copy $ 300 Conformed Specifications 5 copies 1DD$/copy $ 500 Record Drawings 0 sheets 5 copies 1.50$/sht 0$/copy $ - Photo Album 24 weeks 2 mlywk 15 SIMI] $ 715 Misc,Equip.$Supplies $ 2.000 $ 4,566 $ 4,795 42,636 Comrwrvea.ffi Gt y4D2 ExhlbItG Approximate Fee Breakdown by Tasks Item Item Description Approximate Breakdown by To. Average Rate Inc. Oven, & Sub- Task 1-ConaL Man.&loan. Labor Profit Carollo consultant CDC Total A Constmcfion Management AA Project Adminlsbation 88 $19DA9 $16,763 $455 $17,218 A.2 Field Project Manager' 935 $1"27 $134,894 $8.675 $143,569 B Pre Constvuction Survey 40 $154.19 $6,167 $ 33,600 $2D7 $39,974 C Inspection I Testing Ballast Manf. 211 $14G.97 $29,674 $ 9,975 $8,806 $48,456 D Inspection/Marine 1,152 $128.49 $148,021 $8,056 $156,077 E Diver Services 40 $140.95 $5,638 $ 21,000 $207 $26,845 F Special Consultant 10 $144.05 $1,441 $ 7.875 $52 $9,397 G Shop Drawing Reviews 90 $116.99 $10.529 $465 $/0,995 N RFI-Responses 90 $116.99 $10,629 $465 $10,995 I RFC.Responses 90 $1116.99 $10,529 $465 $10,995 J Plan Change Preparations 45 $9323 $4,195 $233 K428 K Lab.Reportss,Certification,ale. 66 $143.65 $9.475 $341 $9.816 L Progress Mealings(weakly) 110 $84.53 $9.299 $669 $9.867 M Revision-Change Onfers(CO) 90 $9529 $8.576 $465 $9.041 N CO.Reports Tables,Board Agenda 110 $129.84 $14.283 $758 $15,041 . O Job Status Repets 44 $94.76 $4,169 $227 $4,397 P Progress Payments 66 $145.69 $9.607 $341 $9,948 0 Reeonl Dmv4ngs 135 Well $12,773 $ 3360D $2521 $48894 Subtotal(Const.Man.&Insp.) 3,412 $446,563 $ 106,050 $33,309 $5851922 R Task 2-Standon!0 P ccea (SOP 1 Phosel R.1 Prepare dm6 SOPS 120 $111.08 $13,330 $620 $13,950 R2 Present Dealt SOP. 32 $111.08 $3,%S $165 $3.720 R.3 Gather Comments 24 $122.19 $2.933 $124 $3.057 RA Revise SOPS 32 $111.08 S3,555 $323 $3,878 Subtotal(Phase l) 208 $23,372 $1233 $24,605 Phase II R.5 Facske SOP Workshop 40 $141.72 $5,669 $207 $5,875 R.6 Rnalbe SOPS 40 $108.74 $4,350 $207 S4,556 R.7 Printing anti Reporting 24 $92.24 $2,214 $649 $2,863 Sub Total Subtotal (Phasoll) 104 $12232 $11063 $13,295 Task2, Subtotal 3.724 $482,197 $106,060 $35,605 $823,822 Task-3-Additional SMICaS S Permhtin9 Assistance(Optiona6 190 $140.80 $26.751 $982 $27,733 Task 3,Sub-total 190 Total 3,914 S508,918 $106,050 $36,587 $651,555 CmabervW.a: 1 v1N2 PDC COMMITTEE Meeti g Date ra sa.woo-. s!r/oz 3/nioz I AGENDA REPORT em Number Item Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: William Cassidy, Project Manager SUBJECT: Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49, Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50, Rehabilitation of the 14v' Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51, Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc. for Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49; Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50; Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51; and Rehabilitation of the "A"Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52, providing for additional engineering services for an additional amount of $495,247, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,645,048; (2)Approve a budget amendment increase of$1,322,000 for Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49, for a total project budget of$4,882,000; (3)Approve a budget amendment Increase of$1,376,000 for Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50,for a total project budget of$5,775,000; (4)Approve a budget amendment increase of$1,877,000 for Rehabilitation of the le Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51,for a total project budget of$4,493,000; and (5) Approve a budget amendment increase of$1,748,000 for Rehabilitation of the"A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52,for a total project budget of$4,596,000. SUMMARY • In April 2000, the Orange County Sanitation District (District) entered into a Professional Services Agreement(PSA) with Lee& Ro, Inc. (Consultant)for design and construction support services for the replacement of the Bitter Point and Rocky Point pump stations and rehabilitation of the 10 and "A" street pump stations. • The Consultant's draft Preliminary Design Report (December 2000)for the "A" Street Pump Station recommended a new station be built on the adjacent property. The District purchased the property in March 2001. The new station is in detailed design. • The Consultant's draft Siting Report (January 2001) for the Bitter Point Pump Station reported on three possible sites for a new station. Further investigation, evaluation of conceptual designs and input from the City of Newport Beach (October 2001) determined that the site immediately west of the existing station would be the best candidate for a new pump station. Legal counsel is reviewing titles to the property. • The Consultant's draft Siting Report (July 2001)for the Rocky Point Pump Station reported on four possible sites for a new station. Staff was authorized (December 2001) to negotiate with Coast Community College District to establish a joint project (pump station and classroom/parking lot)for the fourth site. The site is the International (Balboa) Bay Clubs, Inc.'s property north of Pacific Coast Highway, across from the existing pump station and Coast Community College District. Staff is drafting the terms for the agreement. • The Consultant's draft Preliminary Design Report (August 2001)for the 14"' Street Pump Station recommended a new station be built on a nearby vacant property. The District purchased the property in January 2002. The new station is in detailed design. • Bitter Point, Rocky Point, Lido, and Bay Bridge pump stations discharge into a common force main network (Reference Figure 1). Recent failures from internal corrosion in the network downstream of the Bitter Point Pump Station have re-emphasized the need for the ability to inspect and service the District's force mains. Staff is developing a plan to determine the status of District's remaining farce mains and a course of action to improve serviceability of the force mains. The failed sections of the network are being replaced and/or lined. • The aforementioned changes in the direction of the pump station projects plus other design issues have required changes in the Consultant's Scope of Work (SOW). Proposed Addendum No. 1 with Lee& Ro, Inc. consists of the following: 1. Additional site investigation and conceptual design of alternatives for new"A" and 10 street pump stations. 2. Additional engineering for new"A" Street and 14th Street pump stations. 3. Additional engineering for a new sound wall and oilfield control panel at the Bitter Point Pump Station. 4. Additional geotechnical investigation for the 10 Street and Bitter Point pump stations. 5. Additional hydraulic analysis of the Newport Beach Force Main Network for input in selection of pipe repair and pump selections for the Bitter Point, Rocky Point, and Bay Bridge pump stations. 6. Additional engineering for a chemical injection system at the Bitter Point Pump Station to combat hydrogen sulfide odors and related corrosion. 7. Additional engineering for specialized excavation/shoring and dewatering specifications for"A" Street, 14r" Street, and Bitter Point pump stations. 8. Additional engineering to conform to the District's latest requirements for Process and Instrumentation Diagrams(P&IDs) in PDS2D format (software)for"A" Street, 14" Street and Bitter Point pump stations. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This Addendum is for an amount not to exceed $495,247 and will amend the Professional Services Agreement to an amount not to exceed $1,645,048. Construction cost estimates for each station have also been updated. An additional $4,634,000 for a total $11.300,000 for the four stations is the Engineer's latest construction estimate. Those additional costs plus costs for additional Staff effort, property purchases and contingencies are reflected in the attached Budget Information Tables. The total additional cost$6,323,000, for a total project(s) budget of$19,746,000, is to be reallocated from CIP reserves. G:%r d�pendarBeard AWe Repay SQW2 Board Agen6 keRn0=11M 13g1 r+ 9dM Page 2 , e w BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: As noted below) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) 2001-02 CIP Budget Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 549, Section 8, Page 26 Replacement of the Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50, Section 8, Page 27 Rehabilitation of the 10 Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51, Section 8, Page 28 Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52, Section 8, Page 29 A Budget increase of$6,323,000 for a total project(s) budget of $19,746,000 from CIP reserves will be required. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Consultant's original Scope of Work (SOW) relied on the 1999 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers (MSE) assessment reports for the Bitter Point, 141"Street, and "A" Street pump stations. The designs consisted principally of the following. Bitter Point Pump Station: • Construct a new pump station designed for the 1989 Master Plan's estimated ultimate peak wet weather flows. The new station would consist of a new below grade wetfdry well structure housing new pumps, piping, ventilation, and electrical. The design shall also include the addition of an above grade electrical/control building. The existing structure would be demolished. • The areas immediately east and west of the existing station would be evaluated as sites for the new station. le Street and "A" Street pump stations: • Install an underground electrical vault to house new electrical and control equipment to meet area classification requirements. The existing electrical equipment would be removed from the existing station. • Install new pump motors, ventilation, gas monitoring equipment, etc. in existing structure. • Install seismic supports on piping. • Repair leaks and cracks in the structure's walls and ceiling. • Replace interior staircase to lower(pump)deck. • Reinforce or replace the entrance staircase into the 10 Street Pump Station (staircase walls not rated for vehicle surcharge loads). "A" Street Pump Station would require a new entrance. • Install a below grade flaw meter vault(no meter currently exists). • Install a side sewage storage tank to provide the District with at least a 2-hour response time in the event of a power loss (not required with a revised response procedure). G:1wpAlebpenpe�BaxN A9xga Reyma�2oM Bea,E PgeMv ReW,ISWbNIem 1]�I.S19.Ooc Page 3 9 • The original Scope of Work (SOW)also required the Consultant to perform an independent assessment for each station's Preliminary Design Report. The Consultant's assessments lead to the following changes to the SOW. 1. Additional site investigation, engineering and conceptual design for new"A" and 141" street pump stations. The existing"A" and 10 street structures were determined to have been weakened by the corrosive nature of their environment. The structures were also found to be too small to rehabilitate to meet safety codes. Thus alternatives to rehabilitating the existing stations were required. 2. Additional engineering for new"A" and 10 street pump stations. Design of the new stations include addition of new below grade wet/dry well structures housing new pumps, piping, ventilation, and electrical. The design shall also include the addition of an above grade electrical/control building and landscaping. Plans and specs shall include the realignment of the gravity sewers to and force mains from the stations and demolition of the existing structures. Additionally, the City of Newport Beach's architect for its Balboa Village Improvement Plans Project is to be added as a sub-consultant to match "A" Street's building to the village's new look. 3. Additional engineering for a new sound wall and oilfield control panel at the Bitter Point Pump Station. The design and construction of the new station will require the City of Newport Beach's sound wall and control panel adjacent to the site to be removed and replaced. The south facing wall of the District's new electrical building is to be incorporated into the new wall's design. The wall's design will also Incorporate the City's latest requirements for appearance and function. The electrical building shall also house the City's new control panel in a separate room. 4. Additional geotechnical investigation for the le and Bitter Point pump stations. The geotechnical investigations required by the original SOW for the two stations were completed prior to determining each station's final location. The soil information from the existing 14'^ Street site was instrumental in determining the structure's weakened state. The sub-grade of an alternate site, east of the existing Bitter Point pump station, was investigated at the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee's request. Geotechnical investigation of each station's new location is required for proper design of the structures. 5. Additional hydraulic analysis of the Newport Beach Force Main Network. The recent repairs to the force mains resulted in losses in pipe diameter, thus a loss in capacity for a given pump pressure. The prospects of further size reductions in the network must be considered prior to selection of pumps for the Bitter Point, Rocky Point and Bay Bridge pump stations. The additional hydraulic analysis will also evaluate reconfiguring the network from pump stations in parallel to stations in series as a method to allow inspection and maintenance of the force mains. 6. Additional engineering for a chemical injection system at the Bitter Point Pump Stations. The recent failures in the force main network were due to internal corrosion from sulfuric acid. Sulfuric acid is formed on the surfaces when cyclically exposed to water and air. The chemical (hydrogen peroxide or manganese hydroxide) is to neutralizelminimize the hydrogen sulfides (an ingredient in the G.h AWaydbalBUN AWM Peyb�3Wi 9aW/pBN FeP}tsW]ONum 1�01.NBGx Page 4 formation of sulfuric acid) in the vapor spaces of the force main and junction structure downstream of the pump station. Hydrogen sulfides are also a source of odors for which the District receives complaints. 7. Additional design for specialized excavation/shoring and dewatering specifications for Bitter Point, 14 Street, and "A" Street pump stations. A lesson learned from Contract No. 5-41-1, Relocation of the Lido Pump Station, Is that the Districfa shoring and dewatering specifications for large excavations in urban settings, (e.g. locations with structures horizontally closer than the excavation's depth)are inadequate. Current standard specifications leave the method and design of the excavation/shoring and dewatering to the contractor. Typically sheet piling with dewatering wells is chosen due to its minimum costs compared to other methods. The Consultant is to add a sub- consultant whose expertise is excavation/shoring and dewatering in urban settings. The sub-consultant is to provide conceptual designs, specifications outlining acceptable methods, review of the contractors design and field inspection of the excavation/shoring. Detailed design would remain the contractor's responsibility. 8. Additional engineering to conform to the District's latest requirements for Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) in PDS2D format (software)for'A" Street, W Street, and Bitter Point pump stations. When the original SOW was written, the District had not yet determined that Consultant P&IDs would be done using the PDS2D software. The software Incorporates a database not available in the specified Autocad software that will link the P&IDs to the District's CMMS and EDS maintenance databases. ALTERNATIVES No viable altematives. The recommended action is required to proceed with the only viable altemative for needed improvements to these four critical sewage pumping stations. CEQA FINDINGS A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been published, approved by the Board, and filed with the County Clerk for the new W Street Pump Station. MNDs for the Bitter Point, Rocky Point, and "A" Street pump stations are yet to be completed. The MNDs are to be completed by June 2002. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table(Contract No. 5-49) 2. Budget Information Table(Contract No. 5-50) 3. Budget Information Table(Contract No. 5-51) 4. Budget Information Table(Contract No. 5-52) 5. PSA Status Report 6. Figure 1, OCSD Newport Beach Pump Stations, Gravity Sewers, and Force Mains G-pro mau�soae np",ea�w"+�om emq Nnw+aromsewanem»O15aemc Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REPLACEMENT OF THE BITTER POINT PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-49 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 33.000 $ 1,000 $ 1.DD0 $ 2.000 $ 1.000 S 1.000 $ 2.000 $ 1,500 75% StudieslPermitting $ 22.000 $ 19.000 $ 21.000 $ 40.000 $ 19.000 $ 21,000 $ 40,000 $ 33.500 84% Consultant PSA $ 418.000 $ 325,000 $ 165.0DD $ 490,000 $ 324.537 $ 116.809 $ 441.346 $ 84.500 19% Design Staff $ 66.000 $ 279.000 $ (132,000) $ 147D00 $ 66,000 $ 81,000 $ 147.000 $ 40,000 27% Property Purchase S 10D,000 $ 100,000 Construction Contract $ 1.916.000 $ 1,916,000 $ 1.184.000 $ 3,100,000 $ Construction Administration $ 237,000 $ 243.000 $ (67,0D0) $ 176,000 $ Z. Construction Inspection $ 200000 $ 1:9,000 S 18.000 $ 207,000 $ Conlin enty $ 587.000 $ 588,000 S 32.000 $ 620,000 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 3.479,000 $ 3.560.000 $ 1,322.000' $ 4,882,0010 [$ 410,537 $ 219,809 $ 630.346 $ 159,500 25% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 3.479.000 1 $ 3,560.000 1 $ 1,322.000 1 $ 4,882.000 1 $ 410.537 1 $ 219,809 $ 630346 1 $ 159,500 25% c.1Les.a,V g emn IN PSIc0an..o.aery549 aanenae I au".Teea 030702..1:pa1M. BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REPLACEMENT OF THE ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-50 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Pmecl Development $ 41,000 $ 1.000 $ 1.000 $ 2,000 $ 1,0GO $ 1,000 $ 2.000 S 1,000 50% Studies/Permitting $ 25,D00 $ 17.000 $ 23ADO $ 40,000 $ 17,000 $ 23.000 $ 40.000 $ 24,500 61% Consultant PSA $ 496,000 $ 345,000 1 $ 163.000 $ 498.000 $ 344,679 S - $ 344.679 $ 68,000 20% Design Staff $ 86.000 $ 264,000 $ 132.000 $ 132,OD0 $ 86,000 $ 46,000 $ 132,000 0% Property Purchase $ 275,000 $ 725,000 $ 1,000,000 Construction Contract $ 2,274,000 $ 2.273,000 $ 827.000 $ 3,100,000 $ Z. Construction Administration $ 272,000 $ 294.000 $ 118.000 $ 176.000 $ Construction Inspection $ 235.000 1 $ 233.000 $ 28,000 $ 207.000 1 $ Contin enc $ 695.000 $ 697.000 $ (77,000) S 620.000 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 4,124.000 $ 4,399,000 S 1,376,000 $ 5,775,000 $ 448.679 1 $ 70,000 $ 518,679 $ 93.500 18% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 4,124,000 1 $ 4,399,000 1 $ 1,378,OOD 1 $ 5.775,000 1 $ 448,679 $ 70,001) 1 $ 618.679 1 $ 93,500 78% C:IassidyW9 ewer Pi PSIOhange Ordery5-50 Addenda I Budget Tree 030702,veloico-as i BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF THE 14TH STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-51 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 17,000 $ 1,G00 $ 1.000 $ 2.000 S 1,000 $ 1.000 $ 2.000 $ 1,500 75% StuclieslPennnitfing $ 18,000 $ 15,000 $ 25.000 $ 40,000 $ 15,000 S 25.000 $ 40.000 $ 39.500 99% Consultant PSA 1 $ 266.000 $ 250,000 1 $ 208.000 $ 458.000 $ 242.795 $ 168,185 $ 408.980 1 $ 92,000 22% Design Staff $ 20,000 $ 27,OOD $ 99.000 S 126,000 $ 27.ODO $ 99,000 $ 126.000 $ 39,000 31% Property Purchase S 405,000 $ 405,000 S 405.000 $ 405,000 $ 403.000 100% Construction Contract $ 1217,000 $ 1,239.000 $ 1,361.000 $ 2,6D0,000 $ Construction Administration $ 178.000 $ 180.000 S 32.000 $ 148.000 $ Constmction Inspection $ 128,000 $ 131.000 $ 63.000 $ 194,000 $ Contingency $ 366.000 $ 368.000 S 152,000 $ 520.000 $ PROJECTTOTAL 1 $ 2,210,000 1 $ 2.616,000 $ 1,877,000 $ 4.493,000 $ 690,795 1 $ 291.185 1 $ 981.980 $ 575,000 59% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 2,210,000 1 $ 2,616.000 1 $ 1,877,ODD 1 $ 4.493,000 11 $ 690,795 1 $ 291,185 1 $ 981,980 1 $ 575,000 59% CICasseli BMbr PI PWhanaa 0.dlmiS51 MEmOe I BW"Tads 030702,xlorppri s BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF THE "A" STREET PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-52 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development $ 21.000 $ 1.000 $ 1.000 $ 2.090 $ 1,000 $ 1.000 $ 2.000 $ 1,700 85% Studies/Permitting $ 15.ODO $ 20.000 $ 28.000 $ 48,ODO - $ 20.000 $ 25.000 IS 48.000 $ 47,000 98% Consultant PSA $ 270.000 $ 325,000 $ 180.000 $ 505,000 $ 237,790 $ 212.253 $ 450.043 $ 183,500 41% Design Staff $ 23.000 $ 23.000 $ 115,000 $ 138,000 $ 23,000 $ 116,DD0 $ 138,000 $ 48.000 35% Property Purchase IS 546,000 $ 546,000 $ 545,000 $ 545.000 $ 541,000 99% Construction Contract $ 1.238,000 $ 1,238.000 $ 1,262,000 $ 2,500,000 $ Construction Administration $ 174,000 $ 183.000 $ 39,000) $ 144,000 $ Construction Ins action $ 131,000 1 $ 133.000 1 $ 81.000 $ 214,000 $ C. tinnency 1 $ 376.000 $ 380.000 $ 120.000 $ 500,000 $ PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 2,248,000 $ 2,848,000 $ 1.748,000 $ 4.596,000 1 $ 826,790 $ 356,253 $ IJB3,043 $ 821200 69% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 2.248.000 1 $ 2,848.000 1 $ 1,748.000 1 $ 4,596,000 1 1 $ 826.790 1 $ 356.253 1 $ 1,183,043 1 $ 821,200 69% C:1Cess1dy15-49814n R P91Change Oren45-52 Meares 18Wpe1 Table 050702.xblDlebins Professional Services Agreement Status Report Replacement of the Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-49 Replacement of the Rocky Point Station, Contract No. 5-50 Rehabilitation of the 14' Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-51 Rehabilitation of the "A" Street Pump Station, Contract No. 5-52 Total Project Budget: $13,018,000 Consultant: Lee & Ro, Inc. Start Date of Project: 4/1/00 Date Addendum Description Coat Accumulated Costs Original Provide engineering services for design and 3/22/00 PSA construction support for Contract Nos. 5-49, 5-50, $1,149,801 $1,149,801 5-51, and 5-52 Additional engineering services, principally for the design of new stations for 14' and "A" street pump Pending 1 stations, additional secondary systems at the Bitter $495,247 $1,645,048 Point Pump Station and specialized excavation/shoring and dewatering specifications CSCassidyl549 Bitter Pt MChange OrdeM549 Addenda 1 PSA Status Report 030702AM 02/06/02 Revised 05114/98 Figure t OCSD Newport Beach Pump Stations, Gravity Sewers, and Force Mains Costs Rass \ I l� \ Plent Swaim"-�� BNk I ��W �030 eq&;tea Pe erwrecmy \` + 1 &IMr Pdre Pe uao Pe PxbPoll Pe Legend Asu.n Pa PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date TOBd.of Dir. 0310,102 03/2](02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number Prnflumb 1Nu Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jeffrey D. Kidd, Contract Project Manager SUBJECT: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a budget amendment increase of$2,118,000 for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, for a total project budget of$7,016,000. SUMMARY • This project consists of two sewer reaches that require improvements to address existing and future hydraulic deficiencies, including the proposed Bolsa Chica development located south of Warner Avenue and west of Boise Chica Street. The Strategic Plan identified these two reaches of the Warner Avenue Sewer to be hydraulically deficient and in need of replacement. • The current project construction contract budget is $3,424,000 for the original design concept of replacement of approximately 4,900 linear feet of 18, 21, and 24-inch sewers along Los Patos, and Warner Avenues in Huntington Beach. • A budget increase is being requested for the following: 1. Due to structural deficiencies revealed in recent video inspections of the existing sewer, an additional 2,700 linear feet of 21-inch sewer needs replacement. 2. A portion of the new sewer was originally planned to be a 36-inch diameter pipe. Due to the shallow depth available for the sewer, the design had to be modified to include three 18-inch diameter sewer pipes in parallel, inside of a reinforced concrete encasement to prevent potential collapse of the sewer. These 18-inch sewer pipes include a total of over 2,000 linear feet of piping that was not anticipated in the original budget. 3. In addition, the City of Huntington Beach has requested additional traffic control at primary intersections including video detection equipment. Also construction work at the intersection of Warner Avenue and Boise Chica Street needs to be performed at night. GA"dl6Ugen6a16o&d Agenda Rep V002 RMrd Agmft ReMftW MJ 10 )Al-=AM Rem.: W¢ Page 1 The revised Engineer's Estimate for construction is $5,412,000, an increase of $1,988,000. The Planning, Design, and Construction (PDC) Committee must ' approve a budget increase prior to advertisement for bids since the Engineer's Estimate is higher than the current authorized construction budget. With a reduction in project contingency of$67,000, the new budget is: Current Total Project Budget: $4,898,000 Current Construction Contract Budget: $3,424,000 Engineers Revised Estimate: $5,412,000 Recommended Revised Total Project Budget: $7,016.000 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization to move $67,000 of contingency funds to cover additional construction costs is being requested at this time. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, 11-22,Section 8, Page 44) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The construction contract line item is being increased by $1,988,000 to $5,412,000. The associated costs for construction administration and construction inspection are being increased accordingly to $217,000 and $343,000. The contingency line item is being decreased by $67,000 to $597,000, bringing the contingency to 10% of the budget, which is standard for projects where the design is complete and ready for construction. The project total is being increased by $2,118,000 to $7,016,000. The proposed source of additional funding is from the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Capital Improvement Reserves. A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Design of the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer includes transitioning from a single pipeline to multiple pipelines in the vicinity of Graham Avenue, due to the limited cover of the street over the pipe in this area. Structural design of the upstream and downstream structures required for this transition was not included in the original project scope. Therefore, the original budget was deficient regarding this item. The original project scope also did not include replacement of the existing 2,700 foot 21-inch sewer. G%rgAC gendaN rd Agenm Fed Q002e rO Aga WAep Q=iem+�p.n-22AW mme Page 2 ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with the construction of the replacement sewer, and the installation of video traffic control equipment as requested by the City of Huntington Beach (NO ACTION). The No Action alternative could eliminate the implementation of cost effective collection system and traffic control improvements, resulting in continued collection system inefficiencies and potential surcharging, and traffic control conflicts. CEQA FINDINGS This project is included in the Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report that was certified on October 27, 1999 and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. An Addendum to the Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report was completed on December 19, 2001. The Consultant has determined that supplemental environmental work will not be required for this project. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table JK:jo:sa c:wm.arvyem•�roHama.necwn Me MAgm NoprlVWVO m1yx).nen.ax Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 11-22 { pUOBED PRQP } ,FUN�B c f, Byp 4 Pgf PO##Ea S ,A§TJMATED ylq'�j xPRIsl �,pRl P � IBUJ3tlT IO4f► 1sD� S 7AYITl��RIZD, urNOrp�seJ1NONS 1 TAL ExlT�MlDITURS �iO1 i3 tlru,.S•. }, ., a1. BUDGEYr BUDG�Y 'IIOIEEASE�1 OOET ,. ,: TO GAT(€= .''RECivSs`fu AUTIi61cizATi N` Tb DATE TOIDATt' . I' Project Development $ 10,200 $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 42,000 $ 48,000 110% Studies/Permiftinq $ 10.000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 1$ 500 5% Consultant PSA $ 215,000 $ 285,000 $ 265.000 $ 282,479 $ 282,479 $ 100,000 35% Design Staff $ 176,400 $ 110,000 $ 110.000 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 100.000 91% Construction Contract $ 2,160.500 $ 3.424,000 $ 1,988,000 $ 5,412.000 $ Construction Administration $ 536,100 $ 155,000 $ 62,000 $ 217.000 $ Construction Ins action $ 208,000 $ 135,000 $ 343,000 $ Confingency $ 929.500 $ 664.000 $ 67,000 $ 597,000 $ PROJECT TOTAL $ 4,027,700 $ 4.898,000 $ 2,118,000 $ 7,016,000 1 $ 444,479 $ - $ 444,479 $ 246,500 55% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 4,027.700 1 $ 4,898,000 1 $ 2,118.000 1 $ 7,016.000 $ 444,479 1 $ - $ 444,479 $ 246,500 1 55% C:TileNelW IMI11.22 Budget IMo TabWASIDlatncls 3' PDC COMMITTEE raeean707re Turw.aaf. 03/0702 03R7/02 AGENDA REPORT 1eiiNiii9 11en NiD Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: Project Management and Engineering Services for Capital Improvement Projects GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve sole source Professional Services Agreement with Project Partners, Inc. to provide project engineering and project management consulting services for the District's Capital Improvement Program, for an estimated amount not to exceed $600,000 for the first year, with a 4% annual escalation fee, for a contract period effective March 27, 2002 through May 30, 2008. SUMMARY • The District's Capital Improvement Program adopted in the 1999 Strategic Plan included over$1.5 billion in new construction over the next 20 years with over$600 million in capital expenditures planned over the next five years. • In lieu of hiring additional regular full time Engineering staff to manage this increased project load, the District contracted for temporary staffing services with Project Partners, Inc. in August 1999. This arrangement has been successful and has allowed the District to move many capital projects forward Without hiring additional permanent staff. • Due to concerns with legal issues experienced by other government agencies using similar temporary staffing arrangements, the District has determined that the existing temporary staffing agreement with Project Partners should be replaced with a Professional Services Agreement that redefines the legal relationship between the two parties. • A Professional Services Agreement has been drafted by General Counsel to provide engineering and project management services at the hourly rates listed in Attachment No. 2. • Staff recommends continuing with Project Partners as a sole-source in order to maintain continuity with the existing engineers that are managing on-going projects. . The estimated total cost of this contract is $600,000 per year, spread over 22 on-going capital projects. All of the work performed by Project Partners will be charged to capital projects, and the cost for their services is included in these project budgets. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Please refer to the attached hourly Billing Rate Schedule (Attachment No. 2). It is estimated that the total fee for services on 22 projects would be approximately $600,000 per year. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Various projects listed in Attachment No. 1) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The fee for these services is budgeted under each of the 22 individual capital projects listed in Attachment No. 1. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Hire regular full-time staff to manage these projects. This alternative would require hiring and retaining or laying off employees at the end of these projects. Since the Districts capital program is not constant over time, it would be difficult, if not impossible to maintain optimum staffing levels. CEQA FINDINGS Each project that Project Partners would work on is subject to individual CEQA actions. ATTACHMENTS 1. Project to be supported by Project Partners, Inc. 2. Billing Rate Schedule JRH:jo G:\wp.dM\agenda\Bmrd Agenda Re;mr \2002 Board Agenda RePGrte\030211tem 13QI.ProgeclPartnere.cm G:I..,dl.l,n kB.ld ABen.RepMy0003 em,d A,nW R�-Zk-1BBIPmptlRan d. Reused: 812=1 Page 2 ATTACHMENT I Projects to be Supported by Project Partners, Design Construction Inc. Complete Complete t aC ram. PRO", 'k =ME Treatment Plant and Joint 1 P2-66 P2 Headworks Rehab 3124/05 5/30/08 2 J-73 Coo pe live Projects Program N/A N/A 3 J-73-2 Long Term Flow Monitoring 4125/02 5/24/07 4 P2-84 P2 Landscapi g along PCH W7102 412103 5 P2-81 Digestion Rehabilitation 8/25105 10t16/06 Collections 6 2-21-1 Carbon Canyon Dam Parallel 11/21/02 5121/04 7 2-24-1 Carbon Canyon Dam Trunk 11/21/02 7/29103 8 2-31 SARI Relief A 12119/02 1/19/05 9 2-50 Atwood Subtrunk Imps 12119/02 1/19/05 10 3-2-1 Miller-Holder Siphon Replace 7/11101 8l7102 11 3-25 Orange-Western Relief Sewer 1/31/02 7/12/02 12 6-13-1 Watson Sewer Street Improvements 7/26/02 3/13/03 13 6-13-2 Arlington Sewer 6/25/02 4/30/03 14 6-13-3 California Sewer 9/26/03 7/2/04 15 7-36 Gisler-Redhill Imps A 10/24102 312/04 16 7-37 Gisler-Redhill Imps B 3/25104 5/3/05 17 7-38 Tustin Trunk Imps 3125/04 5005 18 7-39 Orange Trunk Imps 10/24/02 3/2/04 19 740 West Trunk Imps 3125104 5/3/05 20 741 Gisler-Redhill/North Trnk Imps 10/24/02 312104 21 11.22 Warner Ave. Relief Sewer 9126/02 W7103 N 1-24 Bushard Rehab 4125102 9/8103 *J-73&J-73-2 are not typical designtconstrucfion projects. Design and construction are ongoing throughout the project ATTACHEMENT2 BILLING RATE SCHEDULE TABLE 3-1 PROJECT PARTNERS HOURLY BILLING RATES ENGINEERING TITLE HOURLY BILL RATES Entry Level Engineer $48.01 Assistant Engineer $52.03 Associate Engineer $61.03 Project Engineer $69.37 Associate Project Manager $73.37 Project Manager $77.95 Senior Project Manager $82.54 Engineering Specialist $86.19 JRH:jo G:Xwp.dgkengk720%herberg\Project PaMem AR A=chmenb 022602XATTACHEMENT 2.eac PDC COMMITTEE Mo 07102" T031i7:1 r AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number VDCO2-20 13(m) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Engineer SUBJECT: EFFLUENT PATHOGEN REDUCTION EVALUATION STUDY, JOB NO. J-40-6 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for engineering services for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6,for an amount not to exceed $134,858. SUMMARY • This project will further study options for reducing the pathogen level of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)effluent, including Filtration technologies, ultra violet light, and ozonation. The study will provide refined estimates of the capital costs, operation & management costs, feasibility, implementation schedules, and will develop alternate siting and layouts for options to reduce pathogen levels in the District's ocean discharge. • Staff solicited proposals for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6 from the following five firms: Brown and Caldwell, CH2M Hill, Inc. Camp Dresser and McKee, URS Corporation, and Black and Veatch. Two proposals were received, each containing two of the solicited consultants teaming together. • Staff evaluated the proposals and their expected level of effort. The number of hours proposed range from 523 to 612. See the attached Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services for more information. • Staff recommends approval of a Professional Service Agreement (PSA)with CH2M Hill, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $134,858. • The study Is estimated to take 21 weeks to complete, and will begin within one month after the approval of the PSA. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total project budget for Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study, Job No. J-40-6, is $250,000. Authorization of$134,858,from the Studies/Permitting is being requested. See the attached Budget Information Table for more information. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Page 127) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficiegt funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A budget breakdown is included in the attached Budget Information Table for this project. 1 I ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • This project will develop a more detailed and thorough disinfection plan, based on information contained in the Strategic Plan. This project is being developed following the Huntington Beach Closure Investigation Phase I report, which hypothesizes that the Orange County Sanitation District's ocean discharge could influence near shore bacterial levels. A budget for design and construction of a project to implement effluent pathogen reduction would be developed following completion of the study. The project budget and scope will be amended in the FY 02-03 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)Budget to add pilot testing of the most viable disinfectants. ALTERNATIVES Do not develop the plan. Under this alternative, we would be forced to rely on the existing Strategic Plan analysis. Significant changes have occurred since 1999, these changes would not be available for consideration in the projecrs implementation. CEQA FINDINGS The recommended action is for conducting planning-level engineering, and financial studies, and does not require CEQA documentation. Should a decision be made to proceed with an alternative other than the certified 1999 Strategic Plan and the 1989 Master Plan preferred alternatives, further CEQA analysis may be required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals DAL:JB:sa:jo G1wp.dta�ge %Gard Age Rep0r1e\2002 Board Agnka ReyabY0302g 17(m)J466. o 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE EFFLUENT PATHOGEN REDUCTION EVALUATION STUDY JOB NO. J-40-6 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT]TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE] BUDGET TO DATE(') REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) DECREASE Project Development $ 20.000 $ 20,000 $ 20.000 S 20,000 $ 20.000 S 164 1% Studies/Pertnitting $ 205.000 $ 205,000 $ 205,000 5 70,000 $ 134,858 $ 204.858 $ 3,351 2% Consultant PSA $ $ $ - $ 0% Design Staff $ S $ - $ 0% Construction Contract $ $ $ - $ 0% Construction Administration $ 5 $ $ 0% Construction Inspection $ S $ - $ 0% Contingency $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 5 $ - $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ 90,000 S 134,858 $ 224,858 $ 3,515 2% Reimbursable Costs 1 $ - $ $ - $ 07 PROJECT NET $ 250.000 1 $ 250,000 1 $ - $ 250,000 1 1 S 90,000 1 $ 134,858 1 $ 224,858 $ 3,515 2% e\v,dtaleng\IormsMdWgel laele Form Revised Osl.4,2000 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Effluent Pathogen Reduction Evaluation Study Job No. J-40-6 Total Project Budget: $250,000 Consultant: CH2M Hill, Inc. Start Date of Project: July 1, 2001 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Pending Original Engineering services for Effluent Pathogen $134,858 $134,858 PSA Reduction Evaluation Study \VeacRdewil\ .dlalengV20\BuwOJ40.6 PSA Status RepoM1.doc 02/28/02 ReAsed 0511098 4 y EFFLUENT PATHOGEN REDUCTION EVALUATION STUDY JOB NO. J-40-6 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Camp, Dresser, and McKee (CDM) • CH2M Hill, Inc. Brown and Caldwell and Black and Veatch declined to submit a proposal. Carollo Engineers proposed to team with CDM and URS proposed to team with CH2M Hill, Inc.. As a result, there were two responsive proposals received on February 21, 2001. Proposals were reviewed in-house by a review panel on February 25, 2002. Formal interviews were not conducted. The review panel consisted of four members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10 (10 being best) in six categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work— Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Plan for Managing and Performing the Work -- Rate the team's project management techniques and methods and procedures for performing the tasks. 3. Applicable Related Project Experience— Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to the design and construction of this project. This also rates the team's recent experience on applicable projects as it relates directly to the design and construction support for this project. 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to the Scope of Work for this project. 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants—Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant teams. 6. Proposed Schedule — Does the proposed schedule meet District needs and can the Consultant meet the schedule. After reviewing the proposals, it was determined that CH2M Hill, Inc.'s proposal is superior and reasonable and that the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) should pursue a Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with CH2M Hill, Inc. The following summarizes the attached results for the 5 firms: CH2M Hill, Inc. 1,168 Points CDM 990 Points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the d firms: CH2M Hill. Inc. CH2M Hill, Inc. has a superior team for the project. The team includes noted experts in the field with relevant and recent experience. The team also has intimate knowledge of the OCSD operations facilities. Finally, the project proposal discusses the use of an outside Technical Review Panel for project guidance and participation. Overall, the CH2M Hill, Inc.teams experience and understanding of the issues are seen a key to a successful and credible project. CDM COWS proposal demonstrates an understanding of the project. Also, their participation with the Interim Strategic Plan gives them an understanding of the issues facing OCSD. However, the project team's overall experience with disinfection installation and disinfection research is limited when compared to CH2M Hill, Inc.'s team. CDM's proposal is$10,000 less than CH2M Hill, Inc.'s proposal, but they propose 100 less hours of work. SUMMARY CH2M Hill, Inc. was rated as the best team by all four members of the Staff Selection Committee. Their project team's approach and experience will allow for a successful project and Staff recommends moving forward with CH2M Hill, Inc. JB:jo %Mead%dafal\wp.@alenM72MBumAJ-40-6 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL.dw TABLE 1.0 EFFLUENT PATHOGEN REDUCTION EVALUATION STUDY JOB NO. J-40-6 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Firm CDM CH2M HILL, BLACK AND BROWN Inc. VEATCH AND CALDWELL Reviewer A 292 344 Reviewer B 255 326 Reviewer C 231 277 Reviewer D 212 221 Total Score 990 1168 1,400 Points Maximum Average Score 247.5 292 350 Points Maximum Workforce Estimate 523 612 Man-hours _ 100% Design Completion Proposed 21 21 Weeks Proposed Not to Exceed Fee $125,105 $134,858 Declined to Declined to Submit Submit Draft MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, March 13, 2002, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee ofthe Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 13, 2002, at 5:00 p.m., In the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as bllows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Brian Brady, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Shawn Boyd,Vice Chair Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Brian Donahue Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager Mark Leyes Mike White, Controller Roy Moore Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Joy L. Neugebauer Norm Eckenrode, Board Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Shidey McCracken, Board Vice Chair Mark Conway Directors Absent: Toby Weissert John M. Gullixson James W. Silva (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Nbeting Page 2 March 13, 2002 ' (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE The Director of Finance, Gary Streed, referred the Directors to a handout that refected projected average annual sewer service charge rates based on single-family residences. Mr. Streed briefly reviewed the history of the sewer service rates and advised that a one-year increase was needed. In order to complywith Proposition 218, a mailing to propertyowners will need to be mailed by April 8". A public hearing will be held at the board meeting on May 22" ,and adoption of the ordinance will also take place at that time in order br rates to be effective July 1, 2002. Mr. Streed reported that staf has been meeting with the General Manager reviewing next year's proposed department budgets, including disinfection costs as well as full secondary treatment costs. Based on eery preliminary estimates, next years operating budget is expected to increase by 30 to 35%for a number of reasons, disinfection chemicals being the most significant. Additional staff members have been requested pending decisions on disinfection and additional secondary treatment. Blake Anderson, General Manager, stated that staff remains convinced, based on the evidence, that the District's plume has not reached the beach. Nevertheless, he also reported that the City of Irvine and the Irvine Ranch Water District had voted unanimously to oppose the District obtaining the 301(h)waiver in advance of the scientific, technical, financial and regulatory facts that are under development by staff, consultants and an independent blue-ribbon scientific panel. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. 18) REPORT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, reported that Assembly Bill 1892, introduced by Tom Hammon,would be heard by the local government committee on March 20th. She advised a form letter could be provided to the Directors to be sent to the committee iftheir agency wishes to support the bill. It was reported an open house was held at the Orange County Water District regarding the Groundwater Replenishment System project and 28 guests attended. Ms. Murphy provided an interim update of public input on the 301(h) permit issue. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Nbeting Page 3 March 13, 2002 (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. Approve minutes of the February 13, 2002 Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. b. FAHR02-22: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2002. C. FAHR02-23: Receive and file Certificate of Participation (COP) rvbnthly Report. d. FAHR02-24: Receive and file Employment Status Report as of March 4, 2002. e. FAHR02-25: Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. Motion: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (a) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR02-26: Recommend to the Board of Directors to reallocate $60,700 tom the Central Training budget to the Tuition Reimbursement budget, increasing funding from $74,300 to $135,000 for Fiscal Year 01-02. Motion: - It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (12) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR02-27 Outlook for District's Benefit Program for 2002103 The District's health insurance broker, Mark Conway, gave a brief update on rising costs within the health industry. He is currentlytrying to negotiate pending 20%+ increases to current contracts down to 12%+. b. FAHR02-28 Communications Plan Update—One Year Later Lisa Murphy, Communications Manager, gave an update on a five-year communication plan that was presented to the Directors in March of 2001. She reviewed the tools and strategies specific to the FAHR Committee functions that were accomplished during the past year. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 March 13, 2002 (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled br April 10, 2002 at 5 p.m. (18) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:58 p.m. Submitted by. Penny M. e FAHR Committee SeVetary GAxp.db%-Qwda%FAHR1FAHR20022002 Mlnutw%031302 FAHR Mimtec.dw FAHRCOMMITTEE Meeting Date To " O'Dir. 3/13/02 3/27/02 AGENDA REPORT Item Number RM Number FAHR02-22 14(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2002 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of February 2002. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the"Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Long-Term Operating Monies, the District is holding a United Airlines (UAL) Asset Backed Security that carried an acceptable credit rating at the time of purchase. Since that time, the rating from Moody's has fallen twice, first from A3 to BA1, and then to BA3. Also, the security rating from Standard & Poor's fell once from A-to BBB. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if this security was sold. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of"credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. G.k PAb%gwdaW Agenm Repvlell'W2 B d AWM ReP WONtem 14(c).TPEASRPTAM Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT r ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for the month of February 2002. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts February 28,2002 Yield(%) State of Calif.LAIF $ 25,699,348 3.0 Union Bank Checking Account 581,674 N/A Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,906,000 1.1 PIMCO—Short-tenn Portfolio 43.147.667 4.3 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 356,293,632 4.5 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 1.841 (1) Debt Service Reserves wfrmstees 35,161,843 4.3 Petty Cash 5.000 N/A TOTAL 101 7g7 ah5 (1)Unavailable as of the dale of this report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Report MW:lc G:Wgt4gendsTAHR%FAHFcOW3W2A nda RepWs%02-22TRFASRPL do Page 2 ReportPrepared by Finance,3112/02, 10:09 AM Monthly Treasurer's District Fund Balances 11 111 111 ,,,,,,,,11 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII lilulilli $4 1 11 1 1 11 ', 11 1 1 1 1 11 \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ $350,000,000 �i�i�i�i�i -�-•-•-•i � � � � 11 10 111 !••••••••i �i�i�i�i�i �i�i�i�i�i �i�i�i�i�i !i�i�i�i�� �i�i�i�i�i ♦•... ••••. i•••• i•••♦ i•••♦ .•... i•••♦ i•••♦ ♦•••. ••... ♦••H !..•• ••.•. ••.•. i•••♦ i•••• i•••♦ ♦.••. o • 01 o« 01 Nov, 01 Dec, 01 Jan, 02 Feb, 1 61 Debt Service Reserves IT LAIF OEIankAocts • Petty • • : Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund February 2002 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance January 1, 2002 $32,999,348 $32,999,348 $32,999,348 2.970 2.970 Withdrawals: 02/06/002 (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) 2.970 2.970 02/14/02 (3,500,000) (3,500,000) (3,500,000) 2.970 2.970 02/20/02 (800,000) (800,000) (800,000) 2.970 2.970 02/27/02 (1,500.000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) 2.970 2.970 Balance January 31, 2002 25,699,348 25,699,348 25,699,348 2.970 2.970 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT EVVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2002) Page ) of 2 Liquid Operating Monles(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $43,665,654 • Mellon $43,546,120 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $43,921,648 • Mellon $43,801,249 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.23 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 I%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)oft%Change: $100,431 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 68% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": OY• 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.47 0.13 3 Months: 0.89 0.47 12 Months: 4.49 3.41 Year-to-Date: 0.66 0.29 Commentary 1 . Interest men m the short-end of the yield remained the same during the month O-month T-Bills unchanged m 1]5%),while longer maturities decreased(30-year Treasuries down 1 basis point to 5.429A). The Liquid portfolio wiperfrmed the benchmark by 34 basis points during the month,and by 37 basis points far the year-to-date. P1MCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial Peper and short-term notes enhanced returns. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2002) Page 2 of 1 Compliance Issues: None. Split Rated Securities Still in Compliance: $115,000 par of Daimler Chrysler NA HLDG(233835AF4) 7.125%coupon,3/l/2002 maturity, representing 0.3%of the portfolio holdings. The secrity was downgraded on 10/31/2001 by S&P from A-to BBB+;the issue continues to carry a Moody's rating of A3. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. The split rating of this security is no longer an issue as these notes matured,at par, on March 1,2002. • $85,000 par of Ford Motor Credit note(345397RS4) 6.55%coupon, 9/10/2002 maturity, representing 0.2%of the portfolio holdings. The security was downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the issue now carries a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade(from A2)on 1/16/2002. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. $300,000 par General Motors Acceptance Corp security,3/1 I/02 maturity, representing 0.7%of the portfolio holdings (37042W WN7). The security was downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the security continues to carry a Moody's rating of A2. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. (An additional GMAC issue of 500,000 par matured on 12/7/2001. 450,000 par with cusip 37042 WZC8 matured on 01/28/02).The split rating of this security is no longer an issue as these notes matured,at par,on March 11,2002. IWMGO/lepm}rmUNAWnIT ryA�nIWQJ90°J'e!°SRPT.dx MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2002) Page I of 2 Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $358,495,701 • Mellon $358,659,159 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $351,866,661 • Mellon $351,865,457 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.10 Of Index: 2.32 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,528,410 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 34% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AA+" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No• 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 0.74 0.62 1 Month: 0 3 Months: ,96 0.69 12 Months: 6.39 7.56 Year-to-Date: 120 0.91 • Threo-month yields remained the same for the month(90-day T-Bills unchanged at 1.75%)while longer mammies declined(5-yearTerasury Notes down 18 basis points to 4.19%). • The Long-Term portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 12 basis points for the month,and by 29 bads points for the year-to-date. • Positioning the portfolio with below-index duration by PIMCO was slightly negative for performance a yields fell. • Curve positioning was negative for performance,and a below-iMex exposure to intermediate maturities detracted fmm mines as intermediate yields fell the most. • As Treasuries lagged the brander market,an underweight allocation was positive. • Holdings of mortgage-backed securities added strongly to returns as the seam benefited from a more stable interest rule emlmnment during the month. • M underweight allocation to the eorperah,meter added to rcmms due to concerns regarding accounting Mohaml,exacerbated by tightening market liquidity,caused the sector to underperform. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ended 28 February 2002) Page 2 of 2 -Compliance Issues: $1,600,000 par of United Airlines Pass-Through 2001-1-C(909317BC2),6.831%coupon,9/1/2008 maturity,representing OA%of the portfolio holdings. The security was purchased on 9/102001;it was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAl (on 9/182001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 920MOI). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BAI to BA3 on 12212001. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. With respect to the UAL holding,PIMCO's recommendation for the issue has not changed. In their opinion,the spread,collateral,and issuer liquidity all point to continuing to hold the security. The following points provide basis for their recommendation: •foremost,PIMCO doesn't believe that UAL is going bankrupt. Almost all major US airlines have sufficient liquidity and unencumbered assets to survive today's bleak industry conditions. UAL is the second largest carrier in the world,and we believe that the company(and the industry)will survive. •secondly,the collateral is good(very young planes,medium to high aircraft diversification, loan-to-value ratio is 60-75%,etc.). •PIMCO believes liquidation values,even under the most onerous assumptions,are much higher than reflected in current market prices. Current pricing levels overstate the risks. •If the security was sold at the lowest price currently available(67.15 per IDC),the portfolio would realize a loss of$525,600(approximately 15 basis points given the total portfolio value). However,as detailed above,PIMCO believes the fair market value of the issue is much higher than currently reflected in the market. This is a conservative loss estimate. - PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit very closely. If anything changes that would prompt them to revise their recommendation on the inclusion of the security within the portfolio,they will let us know to take appropriate action. Split Rated Securities Still In Compliance: •$6,000,000 par of Daimler Chrysler securities(I7120QE8 end 233835AM9),with S4,500,000 maturing on December 2002 and the remaining$1.5 million maturing on August 2002,represents 1.7%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 1013112001 by S&P from A.to BBB+•,the securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$9,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities(345397GV9,345397RV7,345397SJ3,345397SR5),maturing at various dates in 2003,2004,and 2005, represents 2.6%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade(from A2)on 1/I62002. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. •$11,750,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(370425QV5,37042WE80,37042 WZKO),maturing in 2003,represents 3.3%of the portfolio holdings. The securities were downgraded on 10/162001 by S&P from A to BBB+;the securities continue to carry a Moody's rating of A2. OCSD's guidelines require a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A.by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating. G:Iwp.dmtan1210Whfte1 Trea=,y MgmmILT0800-Feb02.RPT.doe ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1 BASE: USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07511102 28-FEB-2002 FINAL. LIQUID OPEB-P1MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS - UNITED STATES COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 5,873,127.16 5,873,127.16 13.49% 0.00 U.S.GOVERNMENTS-LESS THN IYR 449,675.79 449,929.69 1.03% 253.90 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS 5,176,831.50 5,176,831.50 11.891y. 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 2,991,026.38 2,991,026.38 6.87% 0.00 OTHER U.S.GOVT OBLIGATIONS 399,632.67 399,632.67 0.92% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 4,134,414.88 4,134,414.98 9.49% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 19,024,708.38 19,024,962.28 43.69% 253.90 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 19,024,708-38 19,024,%218 4 69% 253.90 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 7,613,690.50 7,598,174.00 17.43% -25,516.50 U.S.AGENCIES 4,195,108.92 4,179,586.75 9.60% -15,522.07 BANKING&FINANCE 8,997,362.30 8,936,367.74 20.29% -160,994.56 INDUSTRIAL, 1,850,424.00 1,919,774.45 4.18% -30,649.55 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 948,274.40 933,269.20 2.14% -15,005.20 UTILITY-GAS 773,227.50 765,532.50 1.76% -7,695.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 24,378,087.52 24,122,704.64 53.40% -255,392.98 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 24,378,09752 24,122,704.64 55.40% ,255,382.88 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 398,453.49 398,453.49 0.92% 0.00 TOTAL 398,453.49 39$453.49 0.92% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 398,453.49 399,453.49 0.92% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 43,801,249.39 43,546,120.41 100.00% -255,12&98 08-Ma 2002 1&05:19 Executive 94,rb m:6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE I BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 28-FEB-2002 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKETVALUE TOTAL GAINILOSS CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS RECEIVABLES 67,744.27 67,744.27 0.020/6 0.00 PAYABLES -42,542,062.50 42,542,062.50 -11.86% 0.00 TOTAL -42,474,318.23 -42,474,318.23 -11.84% 0.00 UNITED STATES MUTUAL FUNDS 67,365,118.94 67,365,118.94 16.78% 0.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 67,365,118.94 67,365,118.94 19.78% 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 24,890 .71 24,890,800.71 6�� 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES UNITED STATES U.S.GOVERNMENTS 85,009,587.99 95,571,508.15 23.86% 561,920.16 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 29,171,113.29 32,731,600.82 9.13% 3,560,487.53 U.S.AGENCIES 43,635,940.98 45,086,462.23 12.57% 1,450,521.25 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 31,920,913.60 32,286,237.08 9.00% 365,323.48 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 8,170,121.79 8,369,699.49 2.33% 199,577.70 FHLMC POOLS 3,204,758.22 3,200,735.58 0.89% -4,022.64 FHLMC MULTICLASS 3,970,561.09 4,041,536.59 1.13% 70,975.50 FNMA POOLS 15,879,687.50 16,002,500.00 4.46% 122,812.50 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATI 5,546,859.15 5,331,725.50 1.49% -215,133.65 ADS:CAR LOAN 513,906.25 511,875.00 0.14% -2,031.25 BANKING&FINANCE 39,180,009.50 39,405,921.00 10.99% 225,911.50 INDUSTRIAL 27,986,405.00 28,124,370.00 7.84% 137,965.00 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 14,622,010.00 14,895,995.00 4.15% 273,975.00 UTILITY-GAS 7,300,000.00 7,300,000.00 2.04% 0.00 UTILITY-TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,542,675.00 2.10% 45,420.00 TOTAL UNITED STATES 323,609,129.36 330,402,831.44 92.12% 6,793,702.08 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3, 9� 330,402,831.44 92.12% 6,793,702. 88 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 08-Marv1002 I6:06:30 Execulive H*kbewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 2 BASE USD NET ASSET SECTOR SUMMARY OCSF07522202 2&FEB-2002 FINAL LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO %OF UNREALIZED PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS PAYABLESIRECEIVABLES 3,365,526.62 3,365,526.62 0.94% 0.00 TOTAL 3,365,526.62 3,365,526.62 0,94% 0.00 TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,365,526.02 0.94% 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 351,865,456.69 358,659,158.77 100.00% 6,793,702.08 08-Marv2002 16:06:30 Emudw Workbomh YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 1 OCSF07511102 2002/02/28 RON DATE 1 03/06/02 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.12.42 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ E TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE E TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 350,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN .000 2.833 P-1 100.000 349,746.10 1.83 86357THKI VAR RT 06/20/2002 DD 12/20/01 A-1• 350,000.00 .81 100,000.00 STUDENT LN NATO ASSN SHORT TAN .000 1.854 P-1 99.930 99,919.69 .52 86387THL5 VAR AT 07/10/2002 DD 01/17/02 A-14 99,929.69 .23 4,134,414.8E DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 1.768 AAA 100.000 4,134,414.8E 21.73 996085247 AAA 4,134,414.80 9.50 400,000.00 STUDENT IN MARKETING ASSN DISC 1.342 .000 P-1 99.90E 399,632.67 2.10 863871WS HAT 03/05/20D2 A-1s 399,632.67 .93 4,262,000.00 FEDERAL HONE IN MM CORP DISC 1.353 .000 P-1 99,801 4,253,505.60 22.35 313397VA6 MAT 04/02/2OD2 A-I♦ 4,253,505.60 9.86 057,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN RIG CORD DISC 1.367 .000 P-1 99.628 853,615.77 4.48 313393UP6 MAT 03/14/2001 A-I+ 953,815.77 1.99 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN DISCOUNT 1.373 .000 P-1 99.554 1,991,076.94 30.46 313509M3 NAT 03/29/2002 A-I+ 1,991,D36.94 4.61 1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 1.781 .000 99.936 1,499,035.03 7.87 5003M1CC5 03/12/2UO2 11499,035.83 3.43 1,500,000.00 AMERICAN EA CA CP DISC 1.790 .000 99.552 1,493,287.50 3.94 02581SDR9 04/25/2002 1,493,287.50 3.46 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HIS ASSN DISCOUNT 1.020 .000 P-1 99.995 999,949.44 5.25 3I3509TS2 NAT 03/01/2002 A-1♦ 999,949.44 2.32 1.300,DOO.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 1.826 .000 P-1 99.580 2,692,066.61 8.89 36959JCLS 03/20/2002 1,692,916.61 3.92 55,000.00 FEDERAL HONE IN MTG CORP DISC 1.863 .000 P-1 99.311 54,621.26 .28 313397VZI HAT 04/25/2002 A-14 54,621.26 .13 15,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN PTO CORP DISC 2.216 .000 P-1 99.259 14,889.87 .0I 313397UP4 MAY 03/22/2002 A-1+ 14,008.87 .03 1,000,000.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 2.118 .000 P-1 99.131 991,308.33 5.21 07588SDRI 04/25/2002 991,308.33 2.30 VLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2' OCSM7511102 2002/02/28 RUN DATE t 03/06/02 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIM¢ : 13.12.42 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-P PRICE HASSET VALUE B TOTAL 200,ODO.00 BECTON DICKINSON DISC 3.336 .000 P-1 98.314 196,629.89 1.03 0]588SCB) 03/11/2002 196,620.09 .46 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 1.136 .603 19,024,708.38 100.00 19,024,962.28 44.09 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 125,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN HIN .000 2.072 AAA 100.046 124,960.94 .51 3136FOYN6 VAR AT 02/21/2003 DD 08/21/01 AAA 125,057.50 .29 400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MIN ITR 00343 .000 2.622 A2 100.203 400,988.00 1.66 52517PQG9 VAR RT 07/IS/2002 DD 07/12/99 A 400,812.00 .93 1,300,000.00 STUDENT LN RABBETING ASSN .000 2.043 AAA 100.000 1,299,820.13 5.38 86383TNG6 VAR AT 03/21/2002 DD 09/20/01 AM 1,300,000.00 3.01 3,400,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MID ASSN HIS 1.640 6.523 AAA 101.031 3,458,378.00 14.23 31364CH75 6.5901 05/21/2002 DD OS/21/93 AAA 3,435,054.00 7.96 1,245,ODO.00 FEDERAL NAIL HIS ASSN HTN 1.360 6.435 AAA 100.234 1,257,138.75 5.13 31364CE04 6.490% 03/19/2002 DD 03/19/97 AM 1,247,913.30 2.99 20D,ODO.DO FEDERAL ROM LN HIS CORP DEBS 1.909 5.459 AM 100.750 201,914.00 .83 3134A3RE9 5.500% 05/15/2002 DD 05/14/99 AAA 201,500.00 .43 30,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN RUS CONS BD 1.949 5.614 AAA 100.029 30,409.80 .12 3133HSVT9 5.660% 05/21/2002 DO 05/21/99 AM 30,248.40 .03 50,OOD.00 FEDERAL ROVE LN BR CONS BOB 1.963 5.367 AAA 101.094 50,934.50 .20 3133MBXL3 5.8306 06/14/2002 DD 06/14/99 MA 5D,547.00 .12 200,000.00 FED FARM CR BE CONS SYS HIS 2.118 4.344 AM 101.594 203,994.00 .84 31331RD44 4.8201 10/O7/2002 DO 10/07/98 MA 203,188.00 .47 4,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 2.300 6.020 MA 103.028 4,155,312.50 17.21 912827J28 06.250% 02/15/2003 DD 02/15/93 AM 4,153,120.00 9.63 940,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PRR 1ST 6 REF 2.329 3.230 A2 101.444 927,9BI.00 3.78 927804CD4 7.335% 07/01/2002 DD 07/14/92 A 912,996.00 2.12 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 3 OCSF07511102 2002/02/29 RUN DATE : 03/06/02 DISTRICT: LIQUID OPERATING ROD TIM t 13.12.42 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 0 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 25,000.00 FEDERAL NATL RIG ASSN MTN 2.529 6.619 AAA 101.219 25,647.25 .10 31364C092 6.700% 06/04/2002 DD 06/04/97 AAA 25,304.75 .06 90,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 2.562 2.268 AAA 100.105 79,000.00 .33 3136FIAW0 2.230% 12/27/2002 OD 12/27/01 AAA 80,084.00 .19 50,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN OR CONS ENDS 2.563 6.200 AAA 100.156 50,713.00 .20 3133M9U69 6.210% 03/15/2002 OD 09/15/99 _ AAA 50.078.OD .12 50,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN DES CONS BOB 2.538 6.255 AAA 100.641 50,932.50 .20 3133HA211 6.295% 04/25/2002 DD 10/25/99 AAA 50.320.50 .12 25,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN OR CONS BD 2.310 5.356 AAA 100.266 25,292.75 .10 3133MBCL6 5.410% 03/26/2002 DD 03/26/99 AAA 25,066.50 .06 20,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BR CONS BDS 2.026 5.413 AAA I00.680 20,302.40 .08 3133M8RB2 5.450% 05/10/2002 DO 05/10/99 AAA 20,137.40 .05 20o 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 2.730 6.286 AAA 100.641 20,402.20 .08 3134AIMO 1.930% 04/16/2002 OD 04/11/97 AAA 20,128.20 .05 25.000.00 FEDERAL ROM LN BR CONS BDS 2.332 6.095 AAA 100.440 25,468.00 .10 3133HOSXS 6.825% 04/04/2002 DD 04/04/97 AAA 25,110.00 .06 555,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CORP NT 2.365 6.643 A2 100.863 568,475.40 2.32 441812FN9 6.300% 06/15/2002 DD 06/08/95 A 559,709.65 1.30 545,000.00 HERRILL LYNCH&CO HTM 4TR 00012 3.141 7.128 AS 101.714 559,122.50 2.29 59018YAH3 3.250% 07/26/2002 DD 07/26/00 AA- 554.341.3D 1.28 200,000.00 WAL HART STORES INC NT 3.159 6.780 AA2 101.399 206,194.00 .84 9311420G3 6.8351 08/01/2D02 DD 00/01/00 AA 202,798.00 .47 145,000.00 DONALDSON LUFRIN JEWETT 3.162 5.860 AA 100.250 147,009.70 .60 251662AHI 5.875% 04/01/20D2 DO 03/23/99 A- 145.362.50 .34 325,000.00 AHERICAN GEN FIN HER M 00324 3.238 6.434 Al 101.170 333.050.25 1.36 02635PPH9 6.550% 06/24/2002 DD 06/24/99 A+ 329,829.50 .36 575.DDO.00 PNILIP MORRIS COS NT 3.342 6.900 A2 101.959 592,927.30 2.43 31B154BVG 7.125% 00/15/2002 DO 08/15/92 A- 586,264.25 1.36 115,000.00 DAINLERCBRYSLER NA HLDG CORP 3.503 0.125 A3 100.000 116,769.85 .43 233935AF4 2.125% 03/01/2002 DO 03/15/00 A- 115,000.00 .22 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 4 OCSP07511102 2002/02/29 RUN DATE . 03/06/02 DISTRICT. LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.12.42 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 9 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL 500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN OR CONS BOB 3.630 4.489 AAA 100.235 502,69D.00 2.03 3133HE6R7 4.500% 04/04/2002 DO 04/04/01 AAA 501,135.00 1.16 20,000.00 NIAGARA MOHAWK PWR CORP ST 3.723 5.796 NAA2 101.366 20,293.40 .09 653522CQ3 5.8351 09/01/2002 DO 09/01/94 AF 20,273.20 .05 I,IOD,000.00 FIRST ON CORD SUB NT 3.601 3.930 A2 101.849 1,139,714.00 4.64 333358AM3 8.125% 06/24/2002 DO 06/24/92 A- 1,120,320.OD 2.60 605,000.00 CIT GROUP BLOCK INC 3.806 6.410 A2 99.452 619,520.00 2.49 I25569DP5 6.375% 08/O1/2002 DO 07/20/97 A- 601,684.60 1.39 200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL KID ASSN MTM 3.809 6.133 AAA IOI.150 204,608.00 .94 31164C3W6 6.240% D1/2912002 DO 07/29/97 AAA 203,500.00 .47 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS KIM 4 TR00405 3.853 5.614 A2 101.335 610,960.00 2.52 0739265M4 5.750% 08/12/2002 DO 02/12/Ol A 608,010.00 1.41 165,000.DO MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 4.042 6.23E RA3 10I.560 160,652.05 .69 617446CO0 6.3351 O8/01/2002 DO 07/20/97 AA- 167,507.20 .39 20,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN 89 CONS BOB 4.233 5.853 AAA 101.141 20,272.60 .08 3133M93B6 5.920% 06/14/2002 DO 06/14/99 AAA 20,228.20 .05 1.180,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO SUB NT 4.285 0.236 AA3 101.194 1,224,286.70 4.95 94934OBV5 8.335% 05/15/2002 DO 05/26/92 A 11194,089.20 2.33 500,000.00 BANK ONE CO" SUB 4.300 0.100 Al 100.000 514,280.00 2.03 06423AAA1 0.100% 03/01/2002 DD 03/01/92 A- 500,000.00 1.16 95,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO HIS 4.319 6.484 A3 101.012 06,759.50 .35 345397RS4 6.550% 09/10/2002 DO 09/10/97 SUB. 85,860.20 .20 1,200,000.00 GOLDEN NEST PINL CORP DEL SUB 4.332 0.319 A2 100.671 1,237,614.00 5.00 381317AF3 0.3750 04/15/2002 DD 04/30/92 A- 1,208,052.OD 2.00 60,000.00 CUBE MANHATTAN CORD NEW SUB 4.389 6.542 Al 100.976 61,645.80 .25 16161ABE3 9.625% 05/01/2002 DO OS/01/92 A. 60,505.60 .14 750,000.00 PUBLIC SVC ELEC GAB 4TR 00008 4.398 3.044 A3 IO2.071 773,227.50 3.17 74456QA89 3.900% 09/06/2002 DD 09/06/00 A- 765,532.50 1.37 51,000.00 MERIDIAN BANCO" INC SUB DEB 4.410 3.712 A2 102.119 52,596.30 .21 58956UAB5 3.835% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/92 A- 52,000.69 .12 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 5 MSP07511102 2002/02/29 RUN DATE t 03/06/02 DISTRICTt LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE t 13.12.42 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE 8 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ _---______ 675,000.00 BAHRAINRICA COUP SUN HT 4.424 0.361 RAI 100.173 697,018.50 2.80 066050BQ3 0.3351 03/15/2002 A 676,167.75 1.53 155,000.00 BANK ONE CORP NT 4.522 6.294 AA3 101.681 153.343.75 .65 06423AAC3 6.400% 09/01/2002 DO 07/22/99 A 153.605.55 .33 1,015,000.00 WESTINGHOUSE ELEC CORP NT 4.633 8.247 A3 101.548 1,051,302.70 4.23 960402APO 8.335% 06/15/2002 00 06/15/92 A- 1,030,712.20 2.39 300,000.00 GRAC NTN 5.199 5.906 A2 100.061 302,140.00 1.24 32042NNN2 5.5101 03/11/2002 DO 03/10/99 A 300,183.00 .30 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2.144 5.952 24,370,007.52 100.00 24,122,704.64 55.96 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 1.932 4.081 43,402,795.90 100.00 43,147,666.92 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 6 OCSFO7522202 2002/02/28 RUN DATE s 03/06/02 DISTRICTt LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE Y 13.12.42 PAN VALUE TTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 9 TYPE SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 9 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 67,365,110.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 1.768 AAA 100.000 67,365,118.94 100.00 996085247 AAA 67,365,118.94 16.94 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 1.769 67,365,128.94 100.00 67,365,119.94 16.94 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 6,000,000.OD COMMIT TO PUR FNMA IF BIG .000 5.934 AAA 101.109 6,070,312.50 1.03 OIF060444 6.000% 04/01/2017 DO 04/01/02 AAA 6,066,562.50 1.53 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHHA SF BIG .000 6.039 AAA 99.359 9,809,375.D0 3.00 OLF060634 6.0001 03/01/2032 DO 03/0002 AAA 9,935,937.50 2.50 10,50O,ODO.DO COMMIT TO PUR GNNA I SF MM .000 6.306 AAA 101.781 10.631,250.00 3.23 OIN062631 6.5001 03/15/2032 DD 03/01/02 AAA 10,687,005.00 2.65 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA Sr HTG .000 3.563 AAA 105.719 I4,7B3,125.00 4.43 O1H000633 8.0001 03115/2032 DO 03/01/02 AAA 14,900,660.00 3.22 7,500,000.00 ANNEUSER BUSCH COS INC NT .000 6.674 Al 1O1.134 7,646,250.00 2.29 035229AY9 6.750% 06/01/2005 DO 06/05/95 Al 7,585,050.00 1.91 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS HIM 1 TR 00459 .000 2.199 A2 200.046 899,406.00 .22 033928VC4 PLTG AT 12/01/2003 DO 08/II/02 A 900,414.00 .23 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS .000 7.163 AAA 104.703 1,240,000.00 .38 21H072635 7.500% 03/20/2032 DD 03/01/02 AAA 1,256,437.20 .32 4,500,000.00 DAIMLER CHRYSLER NA CORE NT .000 2.645 A3 99.796 4,491,345.00 1.35 233835AM9 FLTG AT 12/16/2002 OD 12/15/00 At 4,490,820.00 1.13 930,273.86 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99-1 CL A4 .ODO 5.674 102.919 949,751.47 .28 25435HAD6 5.840% 10/15/2011 DO 03/18/99 957,419.25 .24 509,356.25 FHLMC GROUP IG4-0353 .000 3.332 AAA 102.293 522,249.32 .25 3129DBMA2 7.500% 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 AAA 521,035.79 .13 7,500,000.00 FEDERAL NO" IN BE CONS BOS .000 6.550 AAA 100.701 7,997,625.00 2.46 3133NAUN3 2.1251 02/15/2005 DD 02/00/00 AAA 0,158,575.00 2.05 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2 OCBF07522202 2002/02/20 RUN DATE 1 03/06/02 DISTRICTI LORG-TERM OPERATING RON TIME 1 13.12.42 .vvv...vvv.v.=.v.v..=.................v.v..............._..............._.................................._................. PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE HAREET VALUE 1 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ____-- ------------ __________ 165,924.75 FHLHC GROUP 108-6064 .000 6.209 AAA 102.234 261,980.35 .05 31349SW23 6.3841 01/01/2020 DO 22/01/90 AAA 169,631.51 .04 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DENS .000 5.104 AAA 102.859 11,521,271.50 3.53 31359MJX2 5.280E 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AAA 11,674,496.50 2.94 690,367.93 GHMA II POOL 10090395 .000 5.403 AAA 101.797 604,111.32 .21 36225CNM4 6.500% 04/20/2030 DO 04/01/00 AAA 702,333.60 .18 5,936,317.31 GUM II POOL 1060408X .000 5.403 AAA 101.197 5,876,026.50 1.02 36225CN20 6.5001 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 AAA 6,042,992.93 1.52 4,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP NTH 100615 .000 2.249 A2 98.201 3,998,440.00 1.18 37042WBO FLTG AT 08/04/2003 DO 08103/Ol BBB. 3,931,240.00 .99 4,000,000.00 NABISCO INC HTS .D00 6.003 A2 102.029 4,081,440.00 1.23 629520CAS VAR RT 02/01/2D33 DO 01/22/96 A 4,001,160.00 I.03 5,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS .000 0.023 A2 106.793 5,263,000.00 1.61 710154CHR 3.5001 0410112004 DO 04/01/97 A- 5,339,650.00 1.34 500,000.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL A-4 .ODO 6.201 AAA 102.375 513,906.25 .15 34046RP936 6.430% 03/00/2004 DO 06/21/99 511,875.00 .13 4,130,525.49 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 .ODO 6.145 AAA 103.170 4,130,525.49 1.29 03162CLJ0 6.3401 03/01/2021 AAA 4,261,463.15 I.03 2,997,107.60 SBA GTD PARTH CTFS SBIC-PS O1 .000 6.330 AAA I04.090 2,997,107.60 .95 031641DD4 6.640% 02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 3,143.666.25 .09 1,600,000.00 UNITED AIRLS PASBTNRU 01-1 C .000 e.eel RAI 76.915 1,600,000.00 .33 9093138C2 6.0311 09/02/2000 DO O8/22/01 A- 1,230,640.00 .31 6,142,263.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY .000 3.313 AAA 104.375 6,261,105.72 1.94 D120204YS 3.835% 01/15/2009 DO O1/15/99 AAA 6,410,997.01 1.61 74,500,000.00 U 8 TREASURY NOTES .000 6.185 AAA 109.141 60,079,062.50 24.60 9I20206D9 06.7501 05/15/2005 DO 05/15/00 AAA 02,320,045.00 20.44 3,500,000.00 VIRGINIA ELEC 6 PNR O1 SER A .000 5.630 A3 102.139 3,497,690.00 1.08 927904EN0 5.750% 03/3112006 DO 03/27/01 A- 3,574,965.00 .90 25,655,120.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NY 3.817 3.290 AAA 102.594 22,909,927.51 0.96 9128272M3 3.3351 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 AAA 26,320,613.91 6.62 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE f 9 OCSP07522202 2002/02/20 RUN DATE + 03/06/02 DISTRICT, LOMO-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 13.12.42 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY BARKET TOTAL C0ST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE BARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1,400,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MIN 5.261 6.319 A3 203.500 1,439,920.00 .43 812400GM6 6.540% 02/20/2003 DO 02/20/97 A- 1,449,000.00 .36 3,950,000.00 GMAC NIS 5.752 2.033 A2 98.660 3,918,768.50 1.19 3304250V5 VAR RT 08/18/2003 DO O0/17/98 A 3,097,070.00 .90 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORD MTN 5.949 6.53I A3 IDI.515 3,073,170.00 .92 8124003AI 6.610E O7/09/2002 DD 07/09/97 A- 3,045,450.00 .77 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR BY CORP GLOBAL NT 5.891 2.005 Al 99.134 1,992,900.00 .60 066365DM4 MID RT O5/22/2003 DO 05/11/99 AA- 1,995,480.00 .SO 15,500,000.OD FEDERAL NAIL MG ASSN DEBS 5.963 6.543 AAA 100.891 16,154,410.00 5.10 31359MFRI 3.125% 02/15/2005 GO 02/14/00 AAA 16,878,105.00 4.24 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTN TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.966 AA2 100.569 3,497,255.00 2.28 079867AXS VAR RT 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/90 AAA 7,542,675.00 1.90 3,000,000.00 BALTIMORE GAS 6 ELEC CO 6.011 6.573 A2 102.625 3,039,250.00 .93 059165DN3 6.3501 12/15/2002 DO 12/20/00 A. 3,078,350.00 .33 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC RTN 4TR00615 6.154 1.999 A3 99.546 1,499,415.00 .45 171200ESO MIS BY O9/08/2002 OD 04/08/98 A 1,493,190.00 .38 3,000,000.00 CONSOLIDATED EDISON N Y DEBS 6.231 1.920 Al 100.070 2,994,300.00 .90 209112CUS VAR RT 06/15/2002 OD 06/20/97 A4 3,002,340.00 .75 3,800,000.00 GENERAL M1RS ACCEP 4TR 00562 6.303 2.074 A2 96.859 3,793,958.00 1.13 37042NEK0 FL.IG AT 02/14/2003 DD 02/14/00 BBB. 3,756,642.00 .94 1,967,521.50 FR1.MC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 5.164 AAA 99.153 1,969,673.09 .59 3233ME95 VAR RT 00/15/2032 AAA 1,950,056.59 .49 1,645,536.50 GNMA GTO REMIC TR 2000-9 IN 6.320 2.339 AAA IDO.433 1,645,518.50 .50 3037R4NK9 VAR RT 02/16/2030 AAA 1,653,321.90 .42 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COB INC 6.330 6.516 A2 103.588 21031,960.00 .62 073902AHI 6.350% 04/15/2003 A 2,031,360.00 .52 3,000,000.00 FORD NIR CR CO GLOBAL LANDMARK 6.350 2.102 A3 90.015 3,000,000.00 .00 345397SR5 MID AT 03/17/2003 DD 03/16/00 A 2,940,450.00 .34 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 6.351 2.053 A3 98.281 1,992,580.00 .59 34S391RV7 PLTG AT 02/13/2003 OD 02/13/98 A 1,965,620.00 .49 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 9 OCSP07522202 2002/02/28 RUN DATE t 03/D6/02 DISTRICTt TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 13.12.42 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE NAREET VALUE 8 TOTAL 21,675.90 GUM POOL #0500917 6.389 5.998 AAA 100.031 20,575.18 .00 36210SPA0 6.000% 0411512029'DO 04/01/99 AAA 21,682.62 .01 66,947.46 GNMA POOL 10506636 6.389 5.99E AAA 100.031 63,357.94 .02 36210TT90 6.0001 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 66,768.15 .02 855,850.13 GUM POOL 60503388 6.389 5.998 AAA 100.031 012,389.00 .25 36210VF55 6.O0D8 03/15/2029 DO 03/01/99 AAA B56,115.44 .22 25,967.29 ON" POOL 10499153 6.305 5.99B AAA 100.031 24,648.63 .00 362I000E5 6.0001 02/15/2029 DO D2/DI/99 AAA 25,975.34 .01 9,591.94 GUM POOL 10496284 6.390 5.991 AAA 100.156 9,104.05 .00 36210M351 6.0001 01/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 9,606.90 .DO 831,993.40 GUM POOL 00496461 6.390 5.991 AAA IDO.156 799,743.72 .25 36210MON4 6.0001 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA $33,291.31 .21 231,152.09 CUM POOL /0491103 6.390 5.991 AAA 1DO.156 219,413.90 .03 36210PAY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO O1/01/99 AAA 231,512.69 .06 20,400.90 GUM POOL #0496720 6.390 5.991 AAA 100.156 19,364.99 .00 36210AVM6 6.000% 12/15/2028 OD 12/01/98 AAA 20,432.81 .01 41,207.08 GUM POOL 10497343 6.390 5.991 AAA 10D.156 39,114.54 .01 3621ONP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 OD 12/01/90 AAA 41,271.36 .01 41,125.71 GUM POOL #0469688 6.391 6.008 AAA 99.895 39,037.30 .01 36209EXRO 1.0001 11/15/2029 DO 11/01/98 AAA 41,074.30 .01 52,501.18 GNMA POOL #0467279 6.391 5.991 AAA 100.156 48,885.90 .01 36209CC03 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/D1/90 AAA 51,581.52 .01 - 76,244.56 GUM POOL #0457814 6.391 6.008 AAA 99.875 72,372.)) .02 362000983 6.00D0 10/15/2020 DO 10/D1198 AAA 76,149.25 .02 680,500.49 GUM POOL #0467286 6.391 5.991 AAA 100.156 653,613.52 .2D 36209CCE2 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/98 AAA 609,654.68 .17 827,978.52 GUM POOL 00465555 6.392 6.008 AAA 99.835 785,932.74 .25 36209AE48 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 01/01/90 AAA 026,943.55 .21 32,416.36 GUM POOL 10403452 6.392 5.991 AAA 100.156 30,310.20 .00 36209NBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 09/01/99 AAA 32,466.93 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 10 OCSF01522202 2002/02/28 RUN DATE t 03/06/02 DISTRICTI LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIM 1 13.12.42 ..................vvvvvv........................vsvvvvvavvvvvvvvvc......vvvvvvvavvvvevvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvucvvv............vavvv PAR VALUE TIM AT CUM" MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ \ TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE \ TOTAL 049,947.52 GNMA POOL 40465546 6.392 6.009 AM 99.835 806,786.12 .25 36209AET3 6.000% 08/15/2028 DO 08/01/98 AAA 940,985.09 .21 7B7,292.38 OHM POOL 40468339 6.392 5.991 AAA 100.156 747,312.70 .23 36209ONQ0 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 08/01/58 AAA 708,520.56 .20 41,292.52 GNM POOL 4043BOS7 6.393 5.991 AAA 100.156 39,195.64 .01 36207PTN9 6.000% 05/IS/2028 DO 05/01/90 ARA 41,356.94 .01 38,894.06 GNM POOL 40468330 6.393 6.008 AM 99.875 36,910.96 .01 36209DHF4 6.0001 05/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 AAA 38,845.44 .01 2,000,000.00 PALM MULTICLASS CTF III A6 6.496 6.210 AAA 104.534 2,000,088.00 .63 3133TOPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 AM 2,090,690.00 .53 2,703,405.59 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SIR 1620E 6.499 6.062 AAA 90.984 2,547,345.65 .80 3133Tl7A4 6.0001 11/15/2D23 DO 11/01/93 AAA 2,676,009.444 .67 1,000,000.00 SALOMON SB HLOGS HTN 6.625 2.059 MI 100.10, 1,000,000.00 .30 39S48EEEB VAR AT 04/28/2003 DO 04/28/00 M- 1,001,090.00 .2S 2,481,041.65 FHLMC GROUP 405-0476 6.628 6.921 AAA 101.133 2,520,628.55 .25 3120DD0SS 3.0001 02/01/2003 OD 02/01/98 AAA 2,510,060.28 .63 964,005.31 GNM II POOL 6080008H 6.70S 6.213 AAA IO2.609 985,91D.43 .29 36225CC20 7.3751 06/20/2027 00 06/O1/97 AM 989,937.00 .25 2,000,000.00 MARSH 6 KLEMM" COS INC BR AT 6.317 6.211 A2 106.662 1,992,280.00 .64 S7174BABB 6.625% 06/15/2004 DD 06/14/91 AA- 2,133,240.00 .54 3,000,000.00 FORD MTII CR CO GWBAL LANDMARK 6.739 6.546 A3 102.349 2,995,080.00 .92 345393SJ3 6.700% 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 BBB. 3,070,440.00 .72 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LNS INC NT 6.866 6.481 A3 I05.609 2,498,400.00 .79 22233UABO 6.050% 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,642,225.00 .66 7,300,000.00 ONEOR INC NEW HT 6.960 2.450 A2 100.000 7,300,000.00 2.20 682680AJ2 FLT'G RT 04/24/2002 DD 04/24/00 A 7,300,000.00 1.84 613,105.64 GNM II POOL 10080023 6.992 6.415 AM 103.266 624,073.47 .11 3622SCAE9 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 AAA 633,955.00 .16 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BK MW SB 00001 7.004 2.616 AA3 99.381 7,000,000.00 2.11 67982KAA6 VAR AT 11/01/2005 DO 04/28/00 A. 6,984,670.00 1.76 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 11 MSFO7522202 2002/02/28 RUN DATE , 03/06/02 DISTRICT: LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.12.42 PAR VALUE VTN AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL 2,300,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL BIG ASSN DENS 2.113 6.113 AAA 108.312 2,030,133.00 .68 31359 MEYS 6.625% 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,274,552.00 .53 2,DDD,000.00 LONG ISLAND LTG CO DEB 7.512 8.044 BAA3 101.944 2,151,250.00 .61 542621CT1 8.200% 03/15/2023 OD 03/28/93 A- 2,038,880.00 .51 810,675.22 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FNA 495-7 3.564 7.384 AAA IDO.625 798,031.74 .24 398ID4AE4 7.4301 06/01/2003 DO 02/29/00 AAA 015,741.94 .21 1.000,ODO.00 FORD ROTOR CA CO NY 0.592 6.693 A3 100.763 965,170.00 .30 345392GV9 6.7501 05/15/2005 BBB- 1,007,970.00 .25 961,671.90 NNP/NUNTOON PAIGE 6000-11150 3.684 3.547 AAA 99.335 940,785.59 .28 302998GE3 7.500% 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 AAA 955,661.45 .24 3,000,OOD.00 PACIFICORP BECD HT" 4TR 00115 3.209 6.841 A2 106.705 2,950,530.00 .96 69512EEUS 7.300% 10/22/2004 DO 1D/22/92 A 3.201,1SO.00 .80 1.600,000.OD ALLSTATE CORP SR BY 3.963 7.209 Al 109.235 1,594,032.OG .52 020002AL5 7.0951 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 A. 1,747,760.00 .44 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL FIIED INCOME SECURITIES 1.464 5.593 323,609,129.36 100.00 330,402,831.44 83.10 ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL 1.459 5.508 390,974,248.30 200.00 390,767,950.38 100.00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 175,808.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2002 -175,809.99 996085247 01-Feb-2002 175,808.89 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 175,808.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2002 -175,B08.89 996085247 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 01-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,107,001.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-Feb-2002 -1,107,001.30 996085247 01-Feb-2002 1,107,001.30 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,107,001.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 01-Feb-2002 -1,107,001.30 996095247 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 01-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,580,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS DISC 01-Feb-2002 -4,575,918.21 313313THI MAT 02/202002 01-Feb-2002 4,575,818.21 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,580,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS DISC 01-Feb-2002 -4,575,91&2I 313313THI MAT 02202002 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC.NY 01-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar-1001 15:59.-00 ax ,.rwv ft kbeach' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 1 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,698.40 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 04-Feb-2002 -25,698.40 996087094 04-Feb-2002 25,698.40 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 42,020.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2002 42,020.29 996085247 05-Feb-2002 42,020.29 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 42,020.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2002 42,020.29 996085247 05-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 05-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 122,213.37 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2002 -122,213.37 996085247 05-Feb-2002 122,213.37 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 122,213.37 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2002 -122,213.37 996085247 05-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 05-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Fab-2002 -500,000.00 996085247 07-Feb-2002 500,000.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-Feb-2002 -500,000.00 996085247 07-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 07-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar-1002 I5:59:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 3 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,679.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Feb-2002 -2,679.17 996085247 08-Feb-2002 2,679.17 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,679.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-Feb-2002 -2,679.17 996085247 08-Feb-2002 0.00 PC 08-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,493.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I I-Feb-2002 -10,493.75 996085247 11-Feb-2002 10,493.75 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,493.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I I-Feb-2002 -10,493.75 996085247 11-Feb-2002 0.00 PC II-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,160.91 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCI II-Feb-2002 -50,160.91 996087094 11-Feb-2002 50,160.91 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,160.91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Feb-2002 -50,160.91 996085247 12-Feb-2002 50,160.91 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,160.91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Feb-2002 -50,160.91 996085247 12-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 12-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59..00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 4 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCED-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 17,2%00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Feb-2002 -17,250.00 996085247 12-Feb-2002 17,250.00 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 17,250.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-Feb-2002 -17,250.00 996085247 12-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 12-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 170,709.80 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2002 -170,709,80 996085247 13-Feb-2002 170,709.80 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 170,709.80 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2002 -170,709.80 996085247 13-Feb-2002 0.00 PC 13-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,969,826.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2002 -1,969,826.83 996085247 14-Feb-2002 1,969,826.83 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,969,826.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2002 -1,969,82CIO 996085247 14-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 14-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,836.03 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCF 14-Feb-2002 -21,836.03 996087094 14-Feb-2002 21,836.03 B 0.00 08-Mar-1002 I5:59.-00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 5 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.OD STUDENT IN MARKETING ASSN DI 14-F6-2002 -399,632.67 863873TW5 MAT 03105/2002 14-Feb-2002 399,632.67 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400.000.00 STUDENT IN MARKETING ASSN DI 14-Feb-2002 -399,632.67 863873TW5 MAT 03105/2002 14-Feb-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 14-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 367,425.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-F6-2002 -367,425.42 996085247 15-Feb-2002 367,425.42 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 367,425.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2002 -367,425A2 996085247 15-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,411,183.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT I5-Feb-2002 -1,411,183.99 996085247 15-Feb-2002 1,411,183.99 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,411,183.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-Feb-2002 -1,41],183.99 996085247 15-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,726.14 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT I5-Feb-2002 -19,726.14 996087094 15-Feb-2002 19,726.14 B 0.00 08-My-2002 I5:59.00 Exeeu( Wmkberxh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 6 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 107,966.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-Feb-2002 -107,966.63 996085247 19-Feb-2002 107,966.63 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 107,966.63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-1`6-2002 -107,966.63 996085247 19-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 19-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 326,494.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Feb-2002 -326,494.40 996085247 20-Feb-2002 326,494.40 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 326,494.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Feb-2002 -326,494.40 996085247 20-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 355,93 L04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Feb-2002 -355,931.04 996085247 20-Feb-2002 355,931.04 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 353,931.04 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-Feb-2002 -355,931.04 996095247 20-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,262,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DIS 20-Feb-2002 -4,253,505.60 313397VA6 MAT 04/02/2002 20-Feb-2002 4,253,505.60 B MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59:00 Eeemiv IPorkbenck ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 7 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2002 - 28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,262,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DIS 20-Feb-2002 4,253,505.60 313397VA6 MAT 04/02/2002 20-Feb-2002 0.00 FC MORGAN STANLEY R CO INC,NY 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100.000.00 STUDENT IN MKTG ASSN SHORT T 20-Feb-2002 -99,929.69 86387THL5 VAR RT 07/182002DD0I/17/ 21-Feb-2002 99,929.69 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN SHORT T 20-Feb-2002 -169.89 86387THL5 VAR RT 07/182002DDOI/17/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 STUDENT IN MKTG ASSN SHORT T 20-Feb-2002 -100,099.59 86387THL5 VAR RT 07/182002DD01/17/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 21-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 20-Feb-2002 -249,924.22 86387THK7 VAR RT 0620/2002 DD 1220/ 21-Feb-2002 249,924.22 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 STUDENT IN MARKETING ASSN 20-Feb-2002 -757.58 86387THK7 VAR RT 06/202002 DO 1220/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 20-Feb-2002 250,581.80 86387THK7 VAR RT 06202002 DO 1220/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 21-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar.2002 15:59:00 &wuthm Workbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 8 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSO00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 251,265.63 DREYFUST'REASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2002 -251,265.63 996085247 21-Feb-2002 251,265.63 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 251,265,63 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2002 -251,265.63 996085247 21-1`6-2002 0.00 FC 21-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56,280.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Feb-2002 -56,290.99 9%085247 22-Feb-2002 56,280.99 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56,280.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-Feb-2002 -56,280.99 996085247 22-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 22-F6-2002 OAO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,190.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2002 -17,190.54 996085247 25-Feb-2002 17,190.54 B 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,190.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2002 -17,190.54 996085247 25-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 25-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 964.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-Feb-2002 -964.17 996085247 27-Feb-2002 964.17 B 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 9 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 964.17 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 27-Feb-2002 -964.17 996095247 27-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 27-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 27-Feb-2002 -1,499,035.83 5007MICC5 03/12/2002 27-Feb-2002 1,499,035.83 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 27-Feb-2002 -1,499,035.83 5007MI CC5 03/12/2002 27-Feb-2002 0.00 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON C 27-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 40.050.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2002 -40,050.56 996085247 28-Feb-2002 40,050.56 B 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 40,050.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-Feb-2002 40,050.56 996085247 28-Feb-2002 0.00 PC 28-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Feb-2002 -999,949.44 313589TS2 MAT03101/2002 28-Feb-2002 999,949.44 B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Feb-2002 -999,949.44 313589TS2 MAT 03/01/2002 28-Feb-2002 0.00 PC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 28-Feb-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 08-Mar-1001 15:59:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: /0 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG000/0000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATPI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTIOW SETTL DATV COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COWL DATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTO 31-Dee-2001 -9,690.625.00 0IF060626 6.000%02/012032 DO 021011 13-FA4002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 13-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTO 03-JM-2002 -6,990,312.50 OIN062623 6.500%02/15/2032 DO 02/15/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS A CO INC,NY 21-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 034a0-2002 -3,490,156.25 OIN062623 6.500%02/152032 DO 02/15/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SP MTG 16Jen-2002 -14,756.975.00 OIN080625 8.000%07JI52032 DO 02115/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21.Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 18-Jan-2002 -1.245.375.00 21HO72627 7.500%02202032 DO,02MU 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Feb-2002 -9,W9,375.OD 0IF060634 6.000%03/012032 DO,031011 13-Mv-2002 9,N9,375.W B GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MTN 8TR 00343 D6-Feb-2002 4W,988.00 52517PQG9 VAR RT 07/152002 DO 07/12/ 11-Feb-2002 400,98&00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 08-Mm 2002 15.59:00 Emud rWw—kbonoT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE: •11 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LASS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MTN NTR 00343 06-Feb-2002 -788.06 52517PQG9 VAR RT 07/152002 DD 07/12/ II-Feb-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 LINIMAN BROS MTN NTR 00343 06-Feb-2002 -401,776.06 52517PQG9 VAR RT 0 711 5/20 0 2 DD 07/121 11-Feb-2002 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 11-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SFMTG 06-Feb-2002 -14,793,125.00 OIN0S0633 8.000%03/152032 DD 03/01/ 21-Mm2002 14,793,125.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DEB - 12-Feb-2002 -201.814.00 3134A3RE8 5.50M405/1MD02 DD 05/14/9 13-Feb-2002 201,814.00 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 12-Feb-2002 -2,688.89 3134A3RE8 5.500°A 05/152002 DD 05/14/9 13-Feb-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 12-Feb-2002 -204,502.89 3134A3RE8 5.500%05/152002 DD 05/14/9 13-Feb-2002 0.00 PC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 13-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA II JUMBOS 13-Feb-2002 -1,249,000.00 21H072635 7.500%03202032 DD 03101/ 21-Mu-2002 1,248,000.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59.00 &wuliw Wo kbexh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. /2 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-Feb-2002 -4,155,312.50 912827178 06.250%0211512003 DO 02/1 S/ 15-Feb-2002 4,155,312.50 B ABN AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-1`eb-2002 4,155,312.50 912827J78 06.250Me02/152003 DD 02/15/ 15-Feb-2002 0.00 FC ABN AMRO BOND TRADING,CHICA 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 80,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-Feb-2002 -79.800.00 3136F1AWO 2.270%12/27/2002 DD 12/27/ 15-Feb-2002 79,800.00 B BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 80,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-Feb-2002 -242.13 3136FIAWO 2.270°/a 12/27/2002 DD 1227/ 15-Feb-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 80,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-Feb-2002 -80.042.13 3136F1AWO 2.270%12272002 DD 12271 15-Feb-2002 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 14-Feb-2002 -7,097,500.00 OIN062631 6.5009%03/152032 DD 03/01/ 21-Mar-2002 7,087,500.00 B BEAR STEARNS&CO INC,NY 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA I SF MTG 14-Feb-2002 -3,543,750.00 OING62631 6.500%03/152032 DD 03/01/ 21-Mar-2002 3,543,750.00 B SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 0.00 08-Mar-2002 /5:59.00 Executive Wi kbeaeh" ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- •13 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESWAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACFION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 20.Feb-2002 -399,969.75 86387THG6 VAR RT 03212002 DD 0920/ 21-Feb-2002 399,968.75 B DAM RAUSCHER INC.MINN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 20-Feb-2002 -3.692.92 96387TH06 VAR RT 03212002 DD 0920/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN 20-Feb-2002 403,661.67 86387THG6 VAR RT 03212002 DD 0920/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC DAIN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 21-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 345,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH&CO MTN STR 000 20-Feb-2002 -352.210.50 59018YAM3 7.250%07262002 DO 072610 25-Feb-2002 352,210.50 B ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PDACO 345,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH&CO MTN STR 000 20-Feb-2002 -2,014.90 59018YAM3 7.250%07262002 DD 0726/0 25-Feb-2002 0.00 IB 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 345,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH&CO MTN STR 000 20-Feb-2002 -354,225.40 59018YAM3 7.250%0726/2002 DO 072610 25-Feb-2002 0.00 FC ADVEST CO,HARTFORD 25-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 20-Feb-2002 -124,960.94 3136FOYW6 VAR RT 02212003DD0821/ 21-Feb-2002 124,%0.94 B DAM RAUSCHER INC,MINN 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59:00 E.muf/ve Wmkbemh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 14 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 125,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 20-Feb-2002 -124,960.94 3136FOYW6 VAR RT 02/21/2003 DD 09121/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC DAIN RAUSCHER INC,MINN 21-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTG 28-Feb-2002 -6,070,312.50 OIF060444 6.000%D4/01/2017 DD 04/01/ 16-Apr-2002 6,070,312.50 B BK OF AMER NATL TR&SVGS CT 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,450.31 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Feb-2002 -13,450.31 3133THA4 6.000%11/IS/2023 DD I V01/9 01-Feb-2002 13,450.31 PU 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,450.31 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 01-Feb-2002 -13,450.31 3133T17A4 6,000%I1/152023 DD 11101/9 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 22-Feb-2002 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 14-J=-2002 -2,194,303.22 313589UG6 MAT 03/152002 154w-2002 2,162,462.50 SC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN -31,840.72 &,"I"Wo eeh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. •15 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOIJDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 14-Jan-2002 -2,194,303.22 313589UG6 MAT 03/15/2002 15-Jan-2002 0.00 FCC BANC OF AMERICA SEC I.I.C.SAN 15Jm-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPERTIMCO -2,200,00000 FEDERAL NA'1'1.MTG ASSN DISCOU 14Jan-2002 2,162,462.50 313589UG6 MA F 03/15/2002 15-Ian-2002 -2,162,462.50 S BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC.SAN 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2.200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 14-Ian-2002 31,840.72 313589UG6 MAT 03/1512002 15-Jan-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2.200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 14-Jm-2002 2,194,303.22 313589UG6 MAT 03/15/2002 15-Jan-2002 0.00 FC BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 15-Jan-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,698.40 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 05-Feb-2002 25,698.40 996087094 05-Feb-2002 -25,698.40 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -39,559.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT II-Feb-2002 39,558.56 996095247 11-Feb-2002 -39,559.56 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -39,558.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 1 I-Feb-2002 39,559.56 9%085247 - 11-Feb-2002 0.00 FC II-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar-1001 15.'59.00 Eaecudw Wo kbemh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ➢AG& 16 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50,160.91 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 12-Feb-2002 50,160.91 996087094 12-Feb-2002 -50,160.91 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -204,502.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2002 204,502.89 996085247 13-Feb-2002 -204,502.89 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -204,502.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-Feb-2002 204,502.89 996095247 13-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 13-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -299,632.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 14-Feb-2002 299,632.67 996085247 14-Feb-2002 -299,632.67 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -299,632 67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-Feb-2002 299,632.67 996085247 14-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 14-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -21,836.03 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 15-Feb-2002 21,936.03 996087094 15-Feb-2002 -21,936.03 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,726,14 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCT 19-Feb-2002 19,726.14 996097094 19-Feb-2002 -19,726.14 S 0.00 08-Ua 2002 15:59:00 &x tlw Wo*bewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 17 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEII-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTI TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -879,303.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2002 879,303.99 W6035247 21-Feb-2002 -879,303.99 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -879,303.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-Feb-2002 979,303.99 9%085247 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 21-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -199,975.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2002 198,975.40 996095247 25-Feb-2002 -198,975.40 S 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -198,975.40 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-Feb-2002 198,975.40 99608$247 25-Fcb-2002 0.00 FC 25-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-F6-2002 13.83 996085247 27-Feb-2002 -13.83 S 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13.83 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 27-F6-2002 13.83 996085247 27-F6-2002 0.00 FC 27-Feb-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMITTOPURFNMASFMTO 01-Feb-2002 9,850,390.62 0IF060626 6.000%02/012032 DO 02/01/ 13-F6-2002 -9,690,625.00 S GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NY 159,765.62 08-Marv2002 15:59.-00 Executive Warkbeach ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE /8 PORTFOLIO DETAE. OCS0000/0000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSDCONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCREMON/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 01-Feb-2002 9,950,390.62 0IF060626 6.000%0 2/012 03 2 DO 02/01/ 13-Feb-2002 0.00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS&CONY 13-Feb•2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14.000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 06-Feb-2002 14,8N.625.00 OINOB0625 8.000°.02/152032 DO 02/15/ 21-Fcb-2002 -14,756,875.00 S SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 43,750.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA SF MTG 06-Feb-2002 14,800,625.00 OIN080625 8.000%02/152032 DO 02/15/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21•Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA II JUMBOS 13-Feb-2002 1,251,093.75 21HO72627 7.500%02202032 DO 02fOU 21-Feb-2002 -1,245,375.00 S SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 5,718.75 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA 0 JUMBOS 13-F6-2002 L251,093.75 21HO72627 7.500%02/20/2032DD02/01/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-Feb-2D02 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES I4•1`eb-2002 2,057,%8.75 9128273Q3 05.750%11/302002 DO 11/301 15-Feb-2002 -2,070,468.75 S WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW •IZ50D.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-Feb-2002 24,326.92 9128273Q3 05.750%11/30=M DO 11/30/ 15-Feb-2002 0.00 IS 0.00 08.Mar-2002 15:59:00 Ewcu"MwkbeMh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE •19 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATFI AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-Feb-2002 2,082,295.67 9128273Q3 05.750Ye11/302002 DO 11/3W 15-Feb-2002 0.00 FC WARBURG DILLON READ LLC,NEW 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500.000.00 COMMIT 1'0 PUB GNMA 1 SF MTG 14-Feb-2002 3,557,421.88 OIN062623 6.500%02/152032 DO 02/151 21-Feb-2002 -3,490,156.25 S SALOMON BROS INC.NEW YORK 67.265.63 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA I SF MTG 14-Feb-2002 3,557,421.98 0IM62623 6.50D%02/15,7032 DO 02/15/ 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC SALOMON BROS INC,NEW YORK 21-Feb-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR ONMA I SF MTG 14-Feb-2002 7,114,843.75 OIN062623 6.500%02/152032 DO 02115/ 21-Feb-2002 -6,990,312.50 S BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 134,531.25 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA I SF MTG 14-Feb-2002 7,114,943.75 OIN062623 6.500%02/I52032 DO 02/151 21-Feb-2002 0.00 FC BEAR STEARNS&CO MC,NY 21-Feb-2002 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56,244.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTP E3 A 15-Deo2001 -56.244.00 3133TCE95 VARRT09/152032 15-Dec-2001 56,305.51 PDC 61.51 08-Af •2002 /5:59:00 Esecudw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: -20 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsco00/0000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COSTJ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -56,235.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A IS-Dec-2001 56,235.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Dec-2001 -56,297.00 PD -61.50 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -56,235.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Dec-2001 56,235.50 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/15/2032 15-Deo-2001 0.00 FC 22-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,035.50 FHLMC GROUP 878-6064 01-Jun-2002 13,035.50 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 12/011 01-Jen-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57,698.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-Jan-2002 57,699.50 3133TCE95 VARRT09115/2032 15-Jan-2002 -57,761.60 PD -63AO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -360,757.54 FHLMC GROUP AG5-0476 01-Feb-2002 360,757.54 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/01/2003 DD 02/01/ 01-Feb-2002 ,366,394.38 PD -5,636.94 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -360,757.54 FHLMC GROUP 8G5-0476 01-Feb-2002 360,757.54 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 02/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,416.32 FHLMC GROUP 004-0353 01-Feb-2002 15,416.32 3128DBMA2 7.500°/v 10/012004 DO 03/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -15,806.55 PD -390.23 08-Mar-1001 /S:59:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 21 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SILIRESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,416.32 FHLMC GROUP#G4-0353 01-Feb-2002 15,416.32 3128D13MA2 7.500%1O101/2004 DD 03101/ 01-Fcb-2002 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50.26 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Feb-2002 50.26 36207PTN9 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -47.71 PD 2.55 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -50.26 GNMA POOL#0438057 01-Feb-2002 50.26 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -L354.21 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Feb-2002 1,354.21 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028DD08N1/ 01-Feb-2002 -1,285.44 PD 68.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,354.21 GNMA POOL#0465546 01-Feb-2002 1,354.21 36209AE13 6.000%0S/15/2028DD08/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 PC 15-Fcb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,220.24 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Fcb-2002 1,220.24 36209AE49 6.0000/.09/152028 DO 091011 01-Feb-2002 -1,15827 PD 61.97 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,220.24 GNMA POOL#0465555 01-Feb-2002 1,220.24 36209AE48 6.000%09/152028 DD 09101/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Ma 2002 15:59:00 Execwm Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PACE., 22 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -884.19 GNMA POOLN0467286 01-Feb-2002 884.19 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028DD10/Ol/ 01-Feb-2002 -939.29 PD 44.90 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .884.19 GNMA POOLN0467286 01-Feb-2002 994.19 36209CCX2 6.000%10/15/2028 DD 10/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -78.28 GNMA POOLN0467279 01-Feb-2002 7828 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/1 52 02 8 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -74.30 PD 3.98 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -78.28 GNMA POOLN0467279 01-Feb-2002 78.28 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/152028 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -556.86 GNMA POOL 00469688 01-Feb-2002 S56.86 36209EXR8 6.000%11/15/2028 DO 11/011 01-Feb-2002 -528.58 PD 28.28 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -556.86 GNMA POOL N0469688 01-Feb-2002 556.86 36209EXRB 6.000%11/152028 DO 11/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb4002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .1,024.05 GNMA POOLN0468339 01-FdM2002 1,024.05 36209DHQO 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -972.05 PD 52.00 08-Ul 2002 15:59:00 - Eucetiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 23 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,024.05 GNMA POOL#0468339 01-Feb-2002 1,024.05 36209DHQO 6.000%08/15/2029 DO 08/011 01-Fcb-2002 0.00 FC 15-F6-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .58.73 GNMA POOL#0468330 01-Fe6-2002 58.73 36209DHF4 6.00V/a05/15/2028DD05/01/ 01-1`6-2002 -55.75 PD 2.99 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -58.73 GNMA POOL#0468330 01-Feb-2002 58.73 36209DHF4 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 051011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -941.27 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-Feb-2002 941.27 36208QSB3 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -893.47 PD 47.80 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -941.27 GNMA POOL#0457814 01-Feb-2002 941.27 36208QSB3 6.000%1 011 5/2 02 8 DD 10/011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -59.35 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Feb-2002 59.35 36209NBV3 6.000%09/152028DD09/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -56.34 PD 3.01 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .59.35 GNMA POOL#0483452 01-Feb-2002 59.35 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC I3-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 24 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FER-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY H3 TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINHASS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -188.05 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Feb-2002 188.05 36210AVM6 6.00D%12/15/2028 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -179.50 PD 9.55 LONG TERM OPER-P1MCO -188.05 GNMA POOL#0486720 01-Feb-2002 188.05 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,434.70 GNMA POOL#0491103 01-Feb-2002 3,434.70 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -3,26018 PD 174.42 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,434.70 ONMA POOL#0491103 01-Feb-2002 3,434.70 36210FRY4 6.000%01/152029 DD 01/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb4002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31.70 GNMA POOL#0499153 01-Feb-2002 31.70 3621000E5 6.0009/6 02/152029 DO 02101/ 01-Feb-2002 -30.09 PD 1.61 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -31.70 GNMA POOL#N99153 01-Feb-2002 31.70 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029OD02/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54.20 GNMA POOL#0497343 01-Feb-2002 54.20 36210NP45 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -51.45 PD 2.75 08-Ma 2002 15:59.00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 25 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsO000l 0000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -54.20 GNMA POOL N0497343 01-Fcb-2002 54.20 36210NP45 6.000%12/15/2028 DD 12/011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,304.68 GNMA POOL N0496461 01-Feb-2002 Q304.68 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -5,984.52 PD 320.16 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,304.68 GNMA POOLN0496461 01-Feb-2002 6,304.68 36210MQN4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11.09 GNMA POOLN0496284 01-Feb-2002 11.09 36210M151 6.000%01/152029 DD 02/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -10.53 PD 0.56 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11.09 GNMA POOL#04%284 01-Feb-2002 11.09 36210MI51 6.000^/e 01/15/I029 DD 02/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,609.09 GNMA POOLN0503388 01-Feb-2002 1,609.09 36210VF55 6.000%03/15/2029 DO 03/011 01-Feb-2002 -1,527.39 PD $1.71 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,609.09 GNMA POOLN0503388 01-Feb-2002 1,609.09 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029DD03/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC I3-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Ua 2002 15:59:00 &eculiw Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 26 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .30.43 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Feb-2002 30.43 36210SPAO 6.DOD%04/152029 DD 041011 01-Feb-2002 -28.88 PD 1.55 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -30.43 GNMA POOL#0500917 01-Feb-2002 30.43 36210SPAO 6.000%04/15/2029 DD 041011 01-1`eb-2002 0.00 PC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -368.62 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Feb-2002 368.62 36210YY90 6.0001/04/152029DD04/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -349.90 PD 18.72 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -368.62 GNMA POOL#0506636 01-Feb-2002 368.62 36210YY90 6.000%D4/15/2029DD04/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,274.88 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 01-Feb-2002 25,274.88 36225CNM4 6.5D0%04/20/2030 DO 04/01/ 01-Feb-2002 -25,045.83 PD 229.05 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,274.88 GNMA II POOL#0080395 01-Feb-2002 25,274.88 36225CNM4 6,500%04/202030 DO D4/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 PC 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -44,059.39 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 01-Feb-2002 44,059.39 36225CC20 7.375%0 62 012 0 2 7 DD 061011 01-Feb-2D02 45,023.19 PD -963.80 08-Mar-2002 15:59:00 aecmNe Wo,k&.h ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 27 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OcS000o7oom 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,059.39 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 01-Feb-2002 44,059.39 36225CC20 7.375%0620/2027 DO 06/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .38,051.91 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 01-Feb-2002 38,051.81 36225CA7_9 VAR RT 122012026 DD 12/01/9 01-Feb-2002 -38,692.04 I'D -630.23 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .38,051.81 GNMA 11 POOL#0090023 01.Fcb-2002 38,051.81 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 12202026 DO 12/0119 01-Feb-2002 0.00 PC 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO ,205,412.90 GNMA 11 POOL d080408X 01-Feb-2002 205,412.90 36225CN29 6.500%05202030 DO 051011 01-Feb-2002 -203,326.69 PD 2,086.22 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -205,412.90 GNMA 11 POOL 8080408X 01-Feb-2002 205,412.90 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 051011 01-17eb-2002 0.00 PC 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,383.43 FHLMC GROUP 87&6064 01-Feb-2002 9,385.45 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DO 12/01/ 01-Feb-2002 .9,156.68 PD 228.77 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,329.55 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 095 01-Feb-2002 1,329.55 39810eAE4 7.430%06/012003 DD 0229/0 01-Feb-2002 -1,310.13 PD 19.42 08-Mar2002 15:59,00 Fw tlw W*,Oewh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 18 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG0o0l0000 01-FEB-2002-28-FED-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESMAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY 1D TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,329.55 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA 895 01-Feb-2002 1,329.55 398108AE4 7.430%W01/2003 DO 02/29/0 01-Feb-2002 0.00 PC 25-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -660.32 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 01-Feb-2002 660.32 302998GE3 7.500%12/012030 DO 102119 01-Feb-2002 -645.98 PD 14.34 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,726A4 DISTRIBUTION FML 99.1 CL A4 15-Feb-2002 19,726.14 25475MAD6 5.840%10/152011 DO 0311819 15-F6-2002 -20,139.16 PD -413.02 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -19,726.14 DISTRIBUTION FML 99-1 CL A4 15-Feb-2002 19,726.14 25475MAD6 5.840%10/15/2011 DO 03/1819 15-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO .57,359.23 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 16.Feb-2002 57,339.23 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Feb-2002 -57,359.23 PD 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57,359.23 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 16-Feb-2002 57,359.23 3837H4NX9 VAR FIT 02/162030 16-Feb-2002 0.00 FC 19-Feb-2002 0.00 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 08-Mar-2001 15:59:00 EeecalAv aribnrc ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 29 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS0000/0000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 07-Feb-2002 499,622.22 5007MIB77 02/07/2002 07-Feb-2002 499,622.22 MT 07-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN DI 14-Feb-2002 99,760.00 9638731 BI MAT 02/142002 14-Feb-2002 -99,760.00 MT 14-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 15-Feb-2002 2,498,100.00 313313TC2 MAT02115/2002 15-Feb-2002 -2,498,100.00 MT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO .4,580,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS DISC 20-Feb-2002 4,575,818.21 313313THI MAT 02/20/2002 20-Feb-2002 4,575,818.21 MT 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 27-Feb-2002 1,497,447.91 63743DBT7 02/272002 27-Feb-2002 -1,497,447.91 MT 27-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 40,000.00 FEDERAL FARM BK CONS SYSTEMW 28-Feb-2002 39.775.00 313313TR9 MAT 02282001 28-Feb-2002 -39,775.00 MT 28-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 28-Feb-2002 998,654.43 313589TR4 MAT02282002 28-Feb-2002 -998,654.43 MT 28-Feb-2002 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 08-Ma,2002 15:59:00 FxscuHve Wo kbeack ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 30 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG0001000o 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 01-Feb-2002 4,200,000.00 3133MAQJI 6.750%02/01/2002 DD 02/01/0 01-Feb-2002 4,278,414.00 MT 01-Feb-2002 -78,414.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -247,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS DEB 01-Feb-2002 247,000.00 31331LAFS 5.200%02/01/2002 DO 02/01/0 01-Feb-2002 -248,044.81 MT 01-Feb-2002 -I,044.81 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 TEXAS UTILS ELEC CO IST MTG 01-Feb-2002 1,000,000.00 B82850BF6 8.125%02/01/2002 01-Feb-2002 -1,021,850.00 MT 01-Feb-2002 -21,850.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -35,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 05-Feb-2002 35,000.00 313395LY9 6.540%021052M DO 02105/ 05-Feb-2002 -35,388.28 MT 05-Fab-2002 -388.28 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEB 11-Feb-2002 200,000.00 3135863E7 7.500%02/112002 DO 2/10/92 11-Feb-2002 -204,660.00 MT II-Feb-2002 4,660.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -150,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MT 4 I I-Feb-2002 150.000.00 31364CWLS 6.290%02/112002 DO 02/I IN 11-Feb-2002 -151,902.00 MT II-Feb-2002 -1,902.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,933,178.00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 14-Feb-2002 1,935,178.00 795498BGI 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 14-Feb-2002 -1,794,SM.30 MT MFeb-2002 140,323.70 08-Ma 2002 15:59:00 a'�tw Wwkbeee6• ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE- 31 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000m000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINMOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -150.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DOS 25-Feb-2002 150.000.00 3133MATE9 7%02252002 DO 0225200D 25-Feb-2002 -152.959.50 MT 25-Feb-2002 -2,959.50 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO -99,360.00 TO BRING ACCOUNT IN BALANCE 27-Feb-2002 0.00 9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Feb-2002 .89,728.11 SW -98,728.11 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -23,826.00 TO BRING ACCT IN TO BALANCE 27-Feb-2002 0.00 9128274Y5 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 28-Feb2002 -24,287.30 SW -24,287.30 INTEREST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 NABISCO INC NTS 01-Feb-2002 122,500.00 629527CA8 VAR RT 02MI2033 DO OI2b9 01-F6-2002 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 OLD KENT BE MTN SB 00001 01-Feb-2002 53,308.89 67982XAA6 VAR RT 1 I/012005 DO 0428/0 01-Feb-2002 0,00 IT 01-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59:00 Emcwiv Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 32 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l 0000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD.CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 247,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BKS CONS DEB 01-Feb-2002 6,422.00 31331LAF5 5.200%02/012002 DO 02/01/0 01-F6-2002 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 01-Feb-2002 141,750.00 3133MAQJI 6.750%02/012002 DD 02/0110 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 01-F6-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 325.000.00 AMERICAN GEN FM MiN 8TR 003 01-Feb-2002 10,643.75 02635PPM9 6.5500%06242002 DD 06/24/9 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 605,000.00 CIT GROUP HLDGS INC 01-Feb-2002 19,284.39 125569DP5 6.375%08/012002 DD 07/28/9 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 155,000.00 BANK ONE CORP NT 01-F6-2002 4,960.00 06423AAC7 6.400%08/012002 DO 0722/9 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 01-F6-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 WAL MART STORES INC NT 01-Feb-2002 6,875.00 931142BGI 6.875%08/012002 DO 08/01/0 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 TEXAS UTILS ELEC CO I ST MTG 01-Feb-2002 40,625.00 882850BF6 8.125%02/012002 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Ma -2002 15:59.00 Eucwive Wwkbendh ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 33 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 165,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 01-Feb-2002 5,259.38 617446CQO 6.375%08/01/2002 DO 0728/9 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 01-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 35,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS BD 05-Feb-2002 1,144.50 313395LY9 6.540%02/05/2002 DO 02/05/ 05-F6-2002 0.00 IT 05-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2002 5,875.79 996085247 01-Feb-2002 0.00 1T 05-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-Feb-2002 96,514.97 996085247 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 05-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN#0061 05-Feb-2002 25,698.40 37042WE80 FLTG RT 08/042003 DO 08/03/ 05-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 05-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 KRAFT FOODS INC DISC 07-Feb-2002 377.78 5007MIB77 02/072002 07-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 07-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 PREMIER AUTO TR 99-3 CL Ad 08-Feb-2002 2,679.17 74046RFW6 6.430%03/092004 DO 0621/9 08-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 08-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59:00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE.. 34 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOL/DATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 150,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN I I-Feb-2002 4,717.50 31364CWL8 6.290%02/112002 DO 02111/9 11-Feb-2002 0.00 IT II-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEB I I-Feb-2002 7,500.00 3135863E7 7.5000A 02/112002 DO 2/10/92 11-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 11-Fcb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT I I-Feb-2002 10,493.75 066365DW4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05111/ 11-Feb-2002 0.00 IT II-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 0 11-F6-2002 50,160.91 831641DD4 6.640%02/102011 DD0221/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT II-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS MTN 8 TRO04 12-Feb-2002 17,250.00 073928SW4 5.750%08/12/2002 DO 02/1210 12-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 12-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL NTS 13-Feb-2002 10,944.17 345397RV7 FLTG RT 02/132003 DO 021131 13-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 13-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 STUDENT LN MARKETING ASSN DI 14-Feb-2002 240.00 863873TBI MAT 02/142002 14-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 14-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59:00 Ereculim Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE. 35 PORTFOLIO DETAIL ocsGOW10000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE? AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HLDGS I 14-Feb-2002 35,250.32 79549BBG1 3.650%02/142002 DO 02/14/ 14-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 14-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 575,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 15-Feb-2002 20.484.38 718154BVB 7.125%0 811 52 0 0 2 DO 0811519 15-Feb-2002 0.00 1T 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK ACCEP CORP MTN 15-Feb-2002 99,450.00 9124DQJAI 6.630%07/092002 DO 07/09/9 15-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 15-Feb-2002 552.187.50 31359MFHI 7.125%0 2/1 520 0 5 DO 02/14/0 15-Feb-2002 0.00 IT I5-Feb-2002 OAO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,50D,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 15-Feb-2002 267.187.50 3133MAUN7 7.125%02/152005 DO 02MM 15-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS SYST 15-Feb-2002 1,900.00 313313TC2 MAT 02/152002 15-Feb-2002 0.00 IT I5-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 188.05 GNMA POOL 80486720 15-Feb-2002 102.95 36210AVM6 6.000%12/152028 DO 12/011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Ma 2002 15:59:00 &"t,.Workbex6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 36 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,434.70 GNMA POOL#0491103 15-Feb-2002 1,172.93 36210FRY4 6.000%01/15/2029DD01/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-F6-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1 L09 GNMA POOL#0496284 15-Feb-2002 48.02 36210M351 6.000%01/15/2029 DO 02/01/ 01-Fe1-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,304.68 GNMA POOL#04%461 15-Feb-2002 4,191.49 36210MQN4 6.000'01/15/2029DDOI/0l/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 54.20 GNMA POOL#0497343 15-Feb-2002 206.31 36210NP45 6.000%12/152028 DD 12/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31.70 GNMA POOL 40499153 15-176-2002 129.99 3621000E5 6.000%02/152029 DO 02/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30.43 GNMA POOL#0500917 15-Feb-2002 108.53 36210SPAO 6.000%04/152029 DO 04/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,609.09 GNMA POOL#0503388 15-Feb-2002 4,287.30 36210VF55 6.000%03/152029 DD 03/011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Ma 2002 15:59.00 Executive Workbench ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: •37 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCSG00010000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 369.62 ONMA POOL 00506636 15-Feb-2002 335.58 36210YY90 6.000%04/152029 DD 04/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,416.32 FHLMC GROUP 804-0353 15-Feb-2002 3,279.83 3128DBMA2 7.500%10/01/2004 DD 031011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 360,757.54 FHLMC GROUP#05-0476 15-Feb-2002 16,591.88 3128DDQ55 7.000%02/012003 DD 021011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,035.50 FHLMC GROUP#78.6064 15-Feb-2002 999.17 31348SWZ3 6.384%01/012028 DD 12/011 014e 2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50.26 GNMA POOL 80438057 15-Feb-2002 206.71 36207PTN9 6.000%05/152028DD05/OI/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 941.27 GNMA POOL 80457814 15-Feb-2002 385.93 36208QSB3 6.000Y 10/152028 DO 101011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,354.21 GNMA P001,00465546 15-Feb-2002 4,256.51 36209AET3 6.000%08/152028DD08/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar-2002 15:59.00 IAaeaetm Workbemb ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT LlPAGE: 38 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2002 -28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAINILOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,220.24 GNMA POOL0465555 15-Feb-2002 4,145.99 36209AE48 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 09/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 78.28 GNMA POOLND467279 15-Feb-2002 257.90 36209CCQ7 6.000%10/15/2028 DO 10/01/ 01-Fcb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 884.19 GNMA POOL80467286 15-Feb-2002 3,447.32 36209CCX2 6.000°/a 10/152028 DO 10/011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 58.73 GNMA POOL#0468330 15-Feb-2002 194.76 36209DHF4 6.000%05/152028 DO 05101/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,024.05 ONMA POOL40468339 15-Feb-2002 3,94L58 36209DHQD 6.0001/608/152026DD08/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 556.86 GNMA POOL80469688 15-Feb-2002 208.41 36209EXRB 6.000%11/15/2028 GO I UOV 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 59.35 GNMA POOL80483452 15-Feb-2002 162.38 36209WBV3 6.000%09/15/2028DD09/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Mar2002 15:59.00 Executive Warkbenc ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: 39 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010060 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARESIPAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,726.14 DISTRIBUTION FINL 99.1 CL A4 15-Feb-2002 4,623-33 25475MAD6 5.840%10/152011 DO 03/18/9 15-FeW002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,900,000.00 GENERAL MIES ACCEP STR 00562 15-Feb-2002 21,220.72 37042WZKO FLTG RT 02/142003 DD 02/14/ 15-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 15-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 BEAR STEARNS MIN d TR 00459 19-Feb-2002 5,497.00 073928VC4 FLTG RT 12/012003 DD 08/17/ 19-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 19-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57,359.23 GNMA OTD REMIC TR 2000.9 FH 19-Feb-2002 3,180.52 3837H4NX9 VAR RT 02/162030 16-Feb-2002 0.00 1T 19-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL LLC MTN BTR006 20-Feb-2002 2,743.49 17120QESO FLTG RT 08/082002 DD 04/08/ 19-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4,580,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS DISC 20-Feb-2002 4,181.79 313313THI MAT 02202002 20-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39,051.81 ONMA II POOL#0080023 20-Feb-2002 3,599.35 36225CAZ9 VAR RT 1220/2026 DD 12/01/9 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2002 0.00 08-M.,2002 15:59:00 &ec.d a Wo kberrc6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE 40 PORTFOLIO DETAIL OCS000010000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR - TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPLDATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 44,059.39 GNMA II POOL 9080098M 20-Feb-2002 5,359.59 36225CC20 7.375%0620/2027 DO 06/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG 7ERM OPER-PIMCO 25,274.88 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 20-Feb-2002 3,280.03 36225CNM4 6.500%04/20/2030 DO 041011 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 205,412.90 GNMA II POOL 8080408X 20-Feb-2002 28,149.60 36225CN28 6.500%05202030 DO 05/01/ 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GMAC NTS 20-Feb-2002 22,203.74 370425QV5 VAR RT 08/182003 DO 08/17/ 20-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 20-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56,235.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 22-Feb-2002 9,824.29 3133TCE95 VAR RT 08/152032 15-Jan-2002 0.00 IT 22-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,450.31 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162 22-Feb-2002 13,450.31 3133117A4 6.000%11/152023 DO 11/01/9 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 22-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-P1MCO 150,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 25-Feb-2002 5,250.00 3133MATE9 7%02/252002 DO 02/252000 25-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 25-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Ma 2002 15:59.00 Executive Wvkbench- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PAGE: e41 PORTFOLIO DETAIL Ocsc000l0000 01-FEB-2002-28-FEB-2002 OCSD-CONSOLIDATED SRARES/PAR TRADE DATE/ AMOUNT/ SECURITY ID TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION/ SETTL DATE/ COST/ TRANSCODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN/LOSS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TI I A6 25-Feb-2002 10,833.33 3133TDPV2 6.500%09252018 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 25-Feb-2002 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,329.55 GREYSTONE SVCNG CORP FHA#95 25-1`eb-2002 5,027.66 39810kAE4 7.430°h06/012003 DD 02/2910 01-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 25-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 27-Feb-2002 2,552.09 63743DBT7 02/272002 27-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 27-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 40,000.00 FEDERAL FARM BK CONS SYSTEMW 28-Feb-2002 225.00 313313TR9 MAT 02282001 28-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 28-Feb-2002 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOU 2&Feb-2002 1,345.57 313589TR4 MAT 02/282002 28-Feb-2002 0.00 IT 28-Feb-2002 0.00 08-Moe-1001 15:59:00 Executive Workbench i FAHR COMMITTEE Meenng Dare To Btl.of Dr. 3/13102 3/27/02 AGENDA REPORT FAH--n "° NN1be FAHR0b26 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: Denise Martinez, Human Resources Assistant SUBJECT: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT BUDGET GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Reallocate $60,700 from the Central Training budget to the Tuition Reimbursement budget, increasing funding from $74,300 to $135,000 for Fiscal Year 01-02. SUMMARY The Tuition and Certification Reimbursement Programs were established to encourage self-development and to increase knowledge, skills and abilities of District employees. Funding for both programs has historically been allocated as part of the District's central training budget. This Fiscal Year funding was reallocated as a separate line item in the Salaries, Wages & Benefits section of the budget in the amount of$74,300. The funds were reallocated to allow additional funding for training activities and to streamline the tracking and budgeting process. The budgeted amount of$74,300 is insufficient to cover the costs of the two programs. While the costs for the Certification Reimbursement Program have remained steady at approximately$5,000 to$6,000 per Fiscal Year, the costs for the Tuition Reimbursement Program have increased. A major reason for the higher costs is that employees are opting to attend private colleges rather than Califomia State University schools to attain their degrees. Therefore, they are being reimbursed up to the annual maximum amount of$5,250. Private colleges are more conducive for working adults because they offer accelerated programs and flexible schedules. The District anticipates an additional $60,700 will be needed to fund both programs through Fiscal Year 01-02. G:+.9.auupenEaUba,tl FBe^d Rep>ti.zroz eoa,a npenm eero.bwNum,alalTuumPeirou,amentax =W2 Page 1 r^ PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Fiscal Year Budget Amount Expenditures 6 - 97 N/A $ 88.784.00 7 - 98 N/A $ 124,094.00 8 - 99 N/A $ 77,180.00 9 - 00 N/A $ 77,825.00 0 - 01 N/A $ 87,711.00 1 - 02 $ 74,300.00 $ 80,350.00 Funds for the Tuition and certification Reimbursement Programs were allocated as part of the District's central training budget up until Fiscal Year 01-02. This Fiscal Year Tuition Reimbursement was budgeted as a separate line hem. ' Tuition Reimbursement expenditures as of January 31,2002. In Fiscal Year 97-98 there was a 20%increase in the number of Tuition Reimbursement Program participants. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District's Tuition Reimbursement Program was established in Fiscal Year 95-96 to encourage the self-development of District employees by providing reimbursement for job-related educational courses. Employees participating in the program are able to receive up to $5,250 annually for tuition reimbursement provided that the courses are primarily for the purpose of increasing capabilities of the employee's present position, preparing the employee for positions to which they could reasonably be expected to advance or updating professional and technical capabilities that are pertinent and beneficial to the District. The District's Certification Reimbursement Program was established in Fiscal Year 96-97 to encourage employees to broaden and further develop their job skills. Employees participating in this program are able to receive reimbursement for fees associated with acquiring and maintaining District-approved city, county, state and federal technical and professional licenses, certifications and registrations. Both programs are administered through the District's Human Resources and Employee Development (HR/ED) Department. The budget amount of$74,300 was intended to be an average based on reimbursement costs in Fiscal Years 98-99, 99-00 and 00-01. However the budget is low due to the fact that the total reimbursement costs for Fiscal Year 00-01 were unavailable at budget time. GM .�1&O�2BwMA PeratlOxQJlem14IEI.Twh w vmm Page 2 Fiscal Year 00-01 reimbursement expenditures were forecasted based on the mid-year expense of$34,500. The actual expenditures for Fiscal Year 00-01 were $87,711. The $74,300 budgeted for Tuition Reimbursement is insufficient to fund both programs through the remainder of the Fiscal Year. As of January 31, 2002 Tuition/Certification Reimbursement costs were at$80,350. The Tuition Reimbursement Program has proven to be a successful and cost- effective benefit to the District and its employees. Since its inception, the Tuition Reimbursement Program has enabled 37%of District employees to increase their job skills and knowledge by participating in the program. An average of sixty employees participates in the program each Fiscal Year. Of the employees that participate, 60% utilize the program to achieve a degree and 40% utilize the program to attain educational certificates and increase their job skills. As a result,twenty-five District employees have attained degrees and all of the participants are becoming more skilled and proficient in their positions enabling the District to maintain a competitive and efficient workforce. Compared to the other training programs offered at the District, the Tuition Reimbursement Program is the most cost-effective. Based on numbers from Fiscal Year 00-01, the cost per hour for a District employee to participate in the Tuition Reimbursement Program is $14.87 compared to $16.19 for Safety Training, $46.52 for Central Training and $43.54 for Technical Training. Additionally, the District spends 2.5% less than the industry standard on Tuition Reimbursement. According to statistics from the American Society for Training and Development, industries allocate 13.3% of their training budget funds to Tuition Reimbursement Programs. Based on Fiscal Year 00-01 figures,the District allocated 10.8% of training budget funds to Tuition Reimbursement. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve a budget increase of$60,700 without transferring money from the central training budget. 2. Do not increase the budget this Fiscal Year and place all Tuition and Certification Reimbursement Requests on hold until next Fiscal Year. CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS c ay.a.��npmm necols]am eoa'E npenm Pewub�aSnen 1 a(a11�Emranw4enm.mc Page 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeang Date I To ad.or Dir. 3R71oz AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 3s Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert Collar, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Simon Watson, Maintenance Manager SUBJECT: EMERGENCY REPAIR OF NO. 3 CENTRAL GENERATION ENGINE AT PLANT NO. 1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify use of General Manager's emergency purchasing authority, Resolution No. OCSD 99-23, for Emergency Repair of the No. 3 Central Generation Engine at Plant No. 1, for Purchase Order Nos. 31480 and 31939 issued to Cooper Energy Services for a combined total of$115,882.59, plus a 10% contingency for freight and any unforeseen work that may be required to complete the repair,for a total amount not to exceed $127,500.00. SUMMARY Background/Discussion • Staff have discovered unanticipated wear on engine parts in all three of the Plant No. 1 central power generation engines that require emergency repair to maintain electrical reliability and minimize electricity purchases. • Staff and an expert consultant inspected all three engines at Plant No. 1. Based upon the consultant's recommendation, both Engine No. 1 and Engine No. 3 will be taken offline. Engine No. 2 is showing some wear, but can be left online until the other two engines are repaired. The one operable engine provides half the electricity the plant requires. The utility, as a backup, can provide all of the plant electricity needs. In addition, all mission critical systems have emergency generation. • The repair of Engine No. 3 has to be expedited to regain electrical reliability and to minimize import of electricity. Normal operation requires two of the three engines to be online to support the plant. • PO 31480 was issued on 1/24102 for the purchase of the cam lobes, which have a 5 to 7 week delivery time, and labor associated with the removal and repair of the engine, the camshaft, and lobes. • Upon further investigation, PO 31939 was issued on 2/28/02 for the purchase of the camshaft drive chain parts that are wom and have a possible 10-week delivery time. • The purchasing of parts and repair on Engine No. 1 will be completed during a scheduled overhaul in late April of this year. • Engine No. 2 will be repaired early in FY2002-2003 with budgeted funds. • This action requires ratification of this emergency procurement by the Board of Directors because the purchase of supplies, services and materials exceed the General Manager's emergency authorization of$100,000. It is important to perform the repair to regain plant electrical reliability and to minimize electricity purchases. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The emergency repair was not budgeted and is an unanticipated expense. However, there are sufficient funds within the Maintenance Budget to cover the cost of the emergency repair. Two quotes for parts and repair were received. One vendor quote was $142,428.05 and Cooper, who is the original equipment supplier, quoted $115,882.59. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Need authorization to perform an emergency repair on one of three Cen-Gen engines at Plant No. 1. The second engine will be repaired during a pre-scheduled overhaul and the third engine will be repaired during FY2002-2003 with budgeted funds. ALTERNATIVES None CECIA FINDINGS Not Required ATTACHMENTS None SW:pjm c uy.auuQuwama npeiaa ne•ms�ooz exam noaaa reemne»:+ne ,s cwye.emcy.q.�arnoc �..:,,: • Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeling Date To lid.of Dir. 3/27/02 AGENDA REPORT Lunn Number I IM Nuneer _ 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE AND CONNECTION AGREEMENT FOR EL MORRO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve sewer service and connection agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District for connection of El Morro Elementary School that is currently located outside of the Orange County Sanitation District boundaries, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)staff met with Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD), Laguna Beach Unified School District(LBUSD)and the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (State Parks)on October 8, 2001 and February 5, 2002 to determine ways to provide sanitary sewer service for El Morro Elementary School and a portion of Crystal Cove State Park that are currently on septic tanks. These facilities are outside of the OCSD boundaries near Pacific Coast Highway, north of Laguna Beach. The major discussion points were as follows: • The San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board will not allow these facilities to remain on septic tanks. • A sewer service and connection agreement appears to be most the desirable approach due to time and expense considerations. • Annexation by IRWD and OCSD is not preferred. Annexation involves Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), is considered very time consuming (several months), and is expensive up front, because of the annexation acreage fees involved. • Sewer service by the City of Laguna Beach is not considered viable, because of the very long distances involved and other jurisdictional issues. • IRWD has verbally agreed to operate and maintain a local sewage pump station to serve these facilities, and to operate as a local sewering agency. • In the mid-1980s, the Board of Directors passed a resolution limiting the"sphere of influence" of the OCSD boundaries in an attempt to control the potential growth and consequent increase in sewage flow for the OCSD sewer shed basin. • The Board of Directors has on a case by case basis, allowed service to small areas outside the OCSD boundaries, most recently a small development of 17 homes in the City of La Habra Heights in the County of Los Angeles. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No cost to OCSD. All construction, connection and operating costs will be bome by others, such as LBUSD and IRWD. All future collection,treatment and disposal costs for OCSD will be recuperated through user fees collected via IRWD. Page 1 f BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION El Morro Elementary School occupies approximately ten acres of property that is outside of the current Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) boundaries. There are approximately 700 students and staff that occupy nine buildings at the school involving 42,200 square feet of occupied space. The corresponding OCSD Capital Facilities Capacity charges applicable to allow connection of these facilities to the OCSD collection system is $675 per 1,000 square feet for a total of$28,485. OCSD will also collect Sanitary Sewer Service Charges (User Fees)on an annual basis. These fees will be included in the Sewer Service and Connection Agreement for payment and collection via the Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD). ALTERNATIVES 1. Do nothing, do not allow any connections. This is considered to be a negative alternative because it would potentially allow further contamination of the ground water and sensitive environment near Crystal Cove due to failed septic systems. 2. Require the school to formally annex their property into the boundaries of the OCSD. This option could cause delays and hardship for the Laguna Beach Unified School District. The additional cost for annexation is expected to be greater than $40,000. Annexations involve processing by the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). This extra time and money for LAFCO processing involving OCSD annexation is a hardship and difficult for LBUSD because they wish to connect by September 2002. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Map of El Morro School and surrounding area CW:jo G:\w .dta\agenda\Board Agenda RepoM0002 Board Agenda Repots\0302\Item 16.IRWD.dm Page 2 OCSD Newport Beach Pump Stations, Gravity Sewers, and Force Mains i ' I Bay Bridge P� ` . V A$' Tc, _ jI NN PS _v K A Street Ps a 4STT Legend \ \ \ ' N.T.S. TNmS� N mm�aa �g Crystal Cove PS \ /�/ o Nsng cN ewwenm March 1112002 R.m sma. �\ //r El Morro School cqm. __ BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ong Date To of D'. 3/D/02 AGENDA REPORT Item N nbe ""nN0 be v Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator. Mark Esquer, Process Engineering Manager SUBJECT: SHORT-TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION, (No. J-87) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the OCSD Engineering report on Short-Term Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Evaluation, dated March 20, 2002; and Receive and File report entitled, Analysis and Interpretation of Fall 1996 and Summer 1997 Water Quality Data, dated March 2002. Designate the use of chemical bleach and sodium bisulfate (dechlorination as a mitigation measure) as the Preferred Alternative for further detailed evaluation. SUMMARY • The proposed short-tens ocean outfall bacteria reduction evaluation comprises chemical bleach (a chlorine-type solution) and sodium bisulfate (dechlorination) chemical addition facilities. The new facilities would be used for a three to five-year period or until a chemical long-term alternative is implemented. • Location and concentration of treated wastewater released into the ocean have always been within the permit limits, and they continue to meet limits today. In early February 2002, concentrations of bacteria were found closer to shore than previously seen. As a result, the District staff is considering a proposal that the District reduce the bacteria level being released to the ocean. This proposal is being suggested in order to eliminate any possibility that bacteria do not reach recreational areas. • As directed by the General Manager, the target for work analysis of the bacteria reduction proposal, environmental reviews, and Board consideration of the matter is as soon as possible. f • The goal of a bacteria reduction effort would be to reduce bacteria levels at the end of the pipeline in the zone of initial dilution to ensure continued compliance with Assembly Bill 411 standards. These standards are known as recreational bathing water standards and include total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacteria limits, based on 30-day geometric mean value. • The chemical addition facilities would be operated to meet all applicable California Ocean Plan requirements for water quality protection including chlorine residual, toxicity, and disinfection byproducts. This goal would ultimately be achieved when a long-term ocean outfall bacteria reduction project is implemented. • The District staff began two efforts to complete the proposed goal. The first effort, an analysis of short-term options, focuses on facilities and technology that can be quickly incorporated into the existing treatment facilities, including ultraviolet light, ozone, and bleach. The alternatives being considered come from research currently being conducted. A second effort involves a long-term project that will consider several alternatives, including those that require major capital improvements. The Engineering Department has recommended the award of a professional service agreement for studying the various long-term project alternatives. • Bleach and ultraviolet light appear to be feasible technologies for reducing bacteria in our effluent. Ozone was not feasible for use with advance primary treated effluent, but can be used for secondary effluent. Ultraviolet light and ozone systems would require considerable plant modifications, requiring at least two, probably three years to implement. The costs of these alternatives are indicated below. • Staff is assessing toxicity and various disinfection byproducts associated with bleach alternatives, as well as conducting an environmental review of the short-term recommendation. As information, a contract for conducting the CEQA study has been issued, and the environmental reviews are in progress. • A bleach system alternative, if it is ultimately approved by the Directors, could be fully operational by October 2002, depending on the environmental review process. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Estimated cost for the for implementing short-term alternatives are: Alternative Capital Cost Annual Operating Cost Bleach wih Dec hlor '000,000 L hUltraviolet $4000000 $4,200,000 Ozone/UV Light $47,000,000 $3,500,000 Note: Ozone/UV Light Alternative: Ozone could be used for secondary treated effluent along with UV Light for advanced primary treated effluent. Gkw OU`apcka WAp Reps W02B MAgentl Repro TMNk 17JA]M Revs 3 2 Page 2 The ten-year present value(s)for bleach with dechlorination, ultraviolet light, and ozone with ultraviolet light systems are$58,054,000, $72.432,000, and 74,027,000, respectively. The short-tens ocean-outfall bacteria-reduction concept was not budgeted. A proposed budget is being developed as part of the upcoming fiscal year budget. Due to delays in some capital improvement projects and the associated capital outlay,there is sufficient funding to cover the cost of the Districts feasibility analysis during the current year. Therefore, a capital budget amendment would not be required to complete this work or cover cost this fiscal year. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted at$XXXX(2001-02 Budget Section x, page xx). ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This Rem has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information Rem) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background OCSD currently releases 245 million gallons per day (MGD) of a blend of primary treated and secondary treated wastewater. The treated wastewater is released 4.2 miles offshore in 200 feet of water. The current blend is 50:50 (50 percent primary to 50 percent secondary). Plant No. 1 treats approximately 90 MGD, all of which receives advanced primary treatment. Approximately 60 MGD receives secondary treatment through trickling filters or the activated sludge plant Plant No. 2 treats approximately 155 MGD, all of which receives advanced primary treatment. Sixty-five (65) MGD also receives secondary treatment through the oxygen activated sludge plant. Flows from Plant No. 1 are sent to Plant No. 2 through interplant pipelines. Flows are then pumped to the ocean outfall and released to the ocean. OCSD has an extensive ocean-monitoring program as required by the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. OCSD samples specific locations around the outfall quarterly for various parameters such as temperature and salinity. In addition, the shoreline is sampled several times each week for bacteria levels. The monitoring is performed to track treated wastewater released to the ocean. During February 2002, OCSD completed a water quality survey immediately preceding and following a Santa Ana wind event During the pre-wind surveys, indicator bacteria were detected at depth, greater than 25 meters, at the monitoring stations in Newport Canyon. In the survey immediately following the winds, currents were going down- coast and tides were high. On that day, bacteria were detected higher in the water column at most monitoring stations and at the surface at one station approximately 3 miles off Newport Beach. At one station, approximately'% mile off Newport Beach at a G:y9suupvwBmJpaNa Re♦pbtMIV BwNyvgs RepwuMllNan t]l8].000 Page 3 e depth of approximately 15 meters (45 feet)and bacterial indicators indicative of the presence of low concentrations of treated wastewater were measured. While these data did not demonstrate that OCSD's release of effluent to the ocean impacted the beach, it suggest that a mechanism exists whereby offshore winds mix deeper water into the surface layers carrying the treated wastewater release up to the surface or near surface. The values detected did not exceed applicable water quality standards. Based on this Receiving Water Quality Study, it appears that, in conjunction with Santa Ana winds and exceptionally high tides, the treated wastewater plume can come within '/2 mile of the shore and be present higher in the ocean than was previously measured. In order to eliminate any possibility that the treated wastewater released to the ocean is adversely affecting surfzone or receiving water quality standards, staff is analyzing whether to include a bacteria-reduction process in the wastewater treatment process. A bacteria-reduction process would be used to accomplish a reduction of bacteria in the treated wastewater release;thereby assuring the water quality standards are maintained. This proposal to reduce bacteria is a cautionary, preventive decision, and it is not based on known violations of water quality standards. The time required to implement this potential treatment change will depend on the decision of the OCSD Board of Directors, the requirements of a review of potential environmental impacts, and the technical issues involved in implementing the proposed capital improvements. Based on the decision to disinfect,the District retained consultant services to investigate various disinfection methods and the feasibility of implementing these methods at the District. In addition, the District had been conducting bench-scale work to determine dose rates of various disinfection alternatives for some proposed testing for the upcoming summer. The consultants are investigating alternative disinfectants to reduce the bacterial concentration of the effluents produced from its treatment plant Nos. 1 and 2. As a preliminary step towards identifying possible processes that could be used for long term effluent disinfection, three common disinfection approaches were selected for bench scale testing: sodium hypochlorite (bleach), ozone, and ultraviolet light radiation. Project Description The results of the bench-scale pilot work will assist in determining the optimal chemical application location(s), concentrations, and additional capital requirements. This information would provide a design basis for the project. One option for providing the short-term bacteria reduction is a chemical dosing of bleach, followed by dechlorination chemical. Because the concentration of bleach required to reduce the bacteria in the time available is higher than can be safely released to the ocean, dechlorination using sodium bisuffite is also required. The target is to achieve no chlorine residual after dechlorination. Anticipated yearly chemical consumption at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 would be 2,200,000 and 6,900,000 gallons, respectively, for a total of 9,100.000 gallons per year. The Plant Nos. 1 and 2 chemical consumption would be based on 60-minute and 20-minute c n.y.auupmm�eeve n�m.A ynuuooz e®m ra.w ,r�er.00c nee a: vmmz Page 4 V contact time, respectively. Shorter contact time for Plant No. 2 may require higher bleach rates to achieve bacteria reduction. Dechlorination rate is based on 10 to 15 mg/L and is anticipated at 3,700,000 gallons per year. New Facilities Plant No. 1 Bleach Facility New bleach facilities would be required. The proposed Plant No. 1 station would be located near the existing plant-water bleach station. The proposed project would consist of storage tanks, pumps, piping, and appurtenance. Secondary spill containment for the tanks would be required. Based on Plant No. 1 flows and dosing rates, bleach usage would be expected to be about 6,000 gallons per day. This would require one to two-tank truck deliveries daily, on the average. Plant No. 2 Bleach Facility The existing effluent bleach facilities would be used. The existing facilities were originally constructed for emergency disinfection of effluent. The facilities are functional, but minor upgrades and modifications would be required to prepare the facility for daily use. Additional piping would be required as outlined in the 1999 Strategic Plan to feed other effluent discharge locations. This existing bleach facility with associated piping and appurtenance is discussed in the 1999 Strategic Plan. The existing facility consists of storage, pumps, piping, and appurtenance. Secondary spill containment for the tanks is already in place. Based on Plant No. 2 flows and dosing rates, bleach usage would be about 18,800 gallons per day. This would require 4 to 5 tank truck deliveries each day, on the average. Plant No. 2 Dechlorination Facility New sodium bisulfite (dechlorination)facilities at Plant No. 2 would be required. The proposed location is just south of Surge Tower No. 2, along the five-mile long outfall pipe. The required facilities consist of storage, pumps, piping, and appurtenance. Secondary containment for the tanks would be required. The injection point for the dechlorination chemical would be downstream of Surge Tower No. 2. Based on plant flows and dosing rates, dechlorination usage would be about 9,965 gallons per day. This would require 2 to 3 tank-truck deliveries daily, on the average. c:oro.ewwm.mma nomm w�a m AWa neouswJmaam n.x�.00c Page 5 ALTERNATIVES 0 Alternatives include the alternative methods of disinfection, mentioned above in the Additional Information section. They generally include bleach with dechlorination, ultra violet light, ozone, or some combination of these alternatives. Bleach appears as the most feasible and cast effective for the short-term. Preliminary evaluation indicated that the alternative methods using ultraviolet light and ozone were not feasible for the short-tens schedule due to the two-to three-year period required for implementation. However, further investigation may determine one or more of these alternatives to be feasible for the long-term project. CEQA FINDINGS The Staff will be returning to the Board of Directors in the near future with recommendations regarding whether to proceed with a bacteria-reduction project. These recommendations will include environmental review in accordance with CEQA. ATTACHMENTS OCSD Engineering Report on Short-Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Evaluation, dated March 20. 2002. Analysis and Interoretation of Fall 1996 and Summer 1997 Water Quality Data, Dated March 2002 G. y.ft.q�Aqn rswu mua gryMANonnee 17-- p,„W � Page 6 v ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Engineering Report on Short-Terre Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction Evaluation Dated March 20,2002 1. Executive Summary This preliminary study report identifies, and evaluates alternatives or detailed concepts for reducing bacteria in treated wastewater released 4.2 miles offshore from Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) outfall pipe. Short-term solutions under consideration consist of ozonation, ultraviolet light, peroxide, and chlorination. Due to the lead-time required to develop detailed concept drawings and documents, as well as design and construction for ultraviolet light or ozone systems, bleach with dechlorination (removal of chlorine) is recommended as the preferred alternative. The detailed concepts for the preferred alternative are being developed in coordination with the environmental review process. The concept development also includes, but not limited to,work associated with determining California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)compliance, evaluating toxicity and chlorine byproducts, along with a cursory feasibility review of each alternative. The goal is to reduce wastewater effluent bacteria levels at the edge of the zone of initial dilution around the District's ocean ouffall diffuser to ensure that the standards at the shoreline required by Assembly Bill 411, known as recreational bathing water standards can be achieved under worst case oceanographic conditions which might carry the effluent plume shoreward. These standards include total cel'dorm, fecal colfform, and enterococcus bacteria, based on 30-day geometric mean value. The facilities will be operated to meet all applicable California Ocean Plan requirements for water quality protection including chlorine residual,toxicity, protection of marine communities, and disinfection byproducts. The goal will ultimately be achieved as part of the long-term bacteria reduction project. OCSD is planning to install short-term bacteria-reduction facilities as soon as possible, pending outcome and review of environmental reports, as well as approval by the OCSD board of directors. It is anticipated that the short-term facilities will remain in full- time service for a three to five-year period (or until a long-term alternative is implemented), while long-term alternatives are being considered, developed, designed, and installed. The short-tern facilities will be considered as back-up facilities after the long-tern facilities are installed. At this time, the most feasible bacteria reduction method to implement is chlorination using bleach,followed by dechlorination (removal of chlorine). This bleach alternative would be developed in conjunction with the environmental studies in order to incorporate any mitigation measures that might be required. It is further planned that after the initial effort, OCSD will continue to consider further bacteria reduction alternatives. OCSD's staff recommendation is to designate the use of chemical bleach and sodium bisulfite (dechlorination as a mitigation measure) as the preferred alternative for the Short-Tern Ocean Ouffall Bacteria Reduction Plan. G Y¢w0.re G,. Page 1 The initial estimated cost of the preferred aftemative is$4,000,000 with an anticipated tl additional operating cost of$7,000,000 per year for chemicals. There will be additional costs for labor, monitoring, and reporting. The optimization of the short-term bacteria- reduction facilities is scheduled through June 2003 and has not been budgeted. 2. Study Objectives Evaluate, develop detailed concept drawings, and prepare to install short-term bacteria reduction facilities. Determine environmental (CEQA) requirements Determine Ocean-discharge permit modification requirements, if any. 3. Background OCSD currently releases 245 million gallons per day (MGD)of a blend of advanced primary treated and secondary treated wastewater. The treated wastewater is released 4.2 miles off shore in 200 feet of water. The current blend is 50:50 (50 percent advanced primary to 50 percent secondary). Plant No. 1 treats approximately 90 MGD, all of which receives advanced primary treatment. Approximately, 60 MGD receives secondary treatment through trickling filters or the activated sludge plant. Plant No. 2 treats approximately 155 MGD, all of which receives advanced primary treatment. Sixty-five (65) MGD also receives secondary treatment through the oxygen activated sludge plant. Flows from Plant No. 1 are sent to Plant No. 2 through interplant pipelines. Flows are then blended and pumped to the ocean outfall. Current ocean permit requirements (for 30-day average discharge)are 100 mg/L of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)and 60 mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS). The average values for OCSD's treated wastewater are 80 mg/L BOD and 49 mg/L TSS, well within the permitted limits. OCSD has an extensive ocean-monitoring program as required by the EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. This program includes monitoring 17 different and speck offshore locations around the outfall, quarterly for various parameters such as temperature, salinity, and E. coli bacteria. Additionally, 17 stations on the shoreline are sampled 3-5 times a week for total and fecal bacteria, and enterococci bacteria. The monitoring is performed to track the treated wastewater released from the outfall pipe. During February 2002 OCSD completed a water quality survey immediately preceding and following a Santa Ana wind event. During the pre-wind surveys, indicator bacteria were detected at depth, greater than 25 meters, at the monitoring stations in Newport Canyon. In the survey immediately following the winds, currents were going down- coast and tides were high. On that day, bacteria were detected higher in the water column at most monitoring stations and at the surface at one station approximately 3 miles off Newport Beach. At one station, approximately'% mile off Newport Beach at a depth of approximately 15 meters (45 feet)and bacterial indicators indicative of the presence of low concentrations of treated wastewater were measured. While these e aea .rc G<x Page v data did not demonstrate that OCSD's release of effluent to the ocean impacted the beach, it suggest that a mechanism exists whereby offshore winds mix deeper water into the surface layers carrying the treated wastewater release up to the surface or near surface. The values detected did not exceed applicable water quality standards. Based on this Receiving Water Quality Study, it appears that, in conjunction with Santa Ana winds and exceptionally high tides,the treated wastewater plume can come within '/a mile of the shore and be present higher in the ocean than was previously measured. In order to eliminate any possibility that the treated wastewater released to the ocean is adversely effecting surfzone or receiving water quality standards, staff is recommending to the Board of Directors that the wastewater treatment process include a bacteria-reduction process. A bacteria-reduction process will be used to accomplish a reduction of bacteria in the treated wastewater release; thereby assuring the water quality standards are maintained. This proposal to reduce bacteria is a cautionary, preventive decision, and it is not based on known violations of water quality standards. The time required to implement this potential treatment change will depend on the decision of the OCSD Board of directors, the requirements of a review of potential environmental impacts, and the technical issues involved in implementing the proposed capital improvements. Ongoing Bacteria Reduction Studies Based on the decision to disinfect, OCSD retained consultant services to Investigate various disinfection methods and the feasibility of implementing these methods at the OCSD. In addition, OCSD had been conducting bench-scale work to determine dose rates of various bacteria reduction alternatives. OCSD continues to conduct bench- scale work for the bacteria reduction effort. The consultants are investigating alternative bacteria reduction agents or methods to reduce the bacterial concentration of the effluents produced from treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2. As a preliminary step towards identifying possible processes to be used for long term effluent bacteria reduction, three common bacteria reduction approaches were selected for bench scale testing: • Sodium hypochlorite (bleach), • Ozone, and • Ultraviolet (UV) light radiation. The goal of these tests are to determine the dose rates of the bacteria reduction methods that would meet the surfzone bacteria limits required by Assembly Bill 411 near the end of the pipe (outfall diffuser)and at the zone of initial dilution (200 feet either side of the diffuser). The bench work was based on a 50:50 effluent blend as presented above. 4. Description of Preferred Alternative The results of the bacteria reduction studies will assist in determining the optimal chemical application location(s), concentrations, and additional capital requirements. This information will be the detailed concept drawings basis for the preferred alternative, which will be implemented as soon as possible, pending the out come of 01"dlQbm MSQUeREOOMNO dedn Reductionp 1deWoonro GA Page and in conjunction with the environmental reviews and pending Board of directors C approval. The alternative proposed to provide the short-term bacteria reduction is a chemical dosing of bleach (a 12.5% solution of sodium hypochlorke). Because the concentration of bleach required to reduce the bacteria, in the contact time available, is higher than can be safely discharged from the ouffall; dechlorination using sodium bisulfite is also required. The goal for chlorination and dechlorination is to reduce bacteria without releasing residual chlorine with the treated wastewater. The bleach dosing will be done at two different locations at each plant. Dosing at two locations will allow OCSD to use a smaller concentration of bleach and effectively use chemical for the reduction of bacteria.Additionally, dosing rates at Plant No. 2 are higher than at Plant No. 1, due to the shorter contact time available at Plant No. 2. Anticipated yearly chemical consumption at Plant Nos.1 and 2 is 2,200,000 and 6,900,000 gallons, respectively, for a total of 9,100,000 gallons per year. The Plant No. 1 and No. 2 chemical consumption is based on 60-minute and 20-minute contact time, respectively. Shorter contact time for Plant No. 2 may require higher bleach rates to achieve bacteria reduction. The dechlorination rate is based on 10 to 20 mg/I and is anticipated at estimated to require 3,700,000 gallons of sodium bisulphite per year. New Facilities Plant No. 1 (Sodium Hypochlorite (Bleach] Facility) New bleach facilities will be required. The proposed location for the new bleach facility is near the southeast comer of the Plant No. 1 secondary aeration basins,just west of the East road. The proposed Plant No. 1 facility will be located near the existing plant- water bleach station. The proposed work consists of tankage based on 14 days of storage. The storage is anticipated to comprise four to six tanks. Secondary spill containment for the tanks will be required and installed. Bleach chemical feed pumps will be required for conveying chemical from the tanks to the feed points. It is anticipated that four to six chemical metering pumps will be required for normal operation and standby duty. Two feed points are required at Plant No. 1. Bleach injection points will be at the Primary Effluent Distribution Box (PEDB) and the Secondary Effluent Distribution Box (SEDB). Dosing at the PEDB will be at a rate of approximately 10-15 mg/L. Dosing at the SEDB will be at a rate of approximately 2-5 mg/L. Piping from the pumps to the feed points will consist of CPVC plastic piping, miscellaneous valves and fittings, and appurtenance. Diffusers will be used to mix chemical into the plant effluent flow stream. G:My.0labm'dMwQUMRECOMHPBstleN WUUSm P'oPG Ea WL-m G. Page r (Sodium Hypochlorite [Bleach] Delivery) Based on Plant No.1 flows and dosing rates, bleach usage is expected to be about 6,000 gallons per day. This would require one to two tank truck deliveries daily, on average. The truck would enter and exit at the main plant entrance on Ellis Avenue. The truck route through the plant would be the East Pedmeter Road. (Chlorine Residual/Controls) Bleach will be flow paced using existing plant effluent meters and trimmed (optimized) based on chlorine residual, using chlorine analyzers. The primary chlorine analyzer will be located south of Plant No. 1 at the effluent junction box, adjacent to Garfield Avenue. A second chlorine analyzer will be located at Plant No. 2, upstream of the ocean outfall booster station. In order to verify residual chlorine during the initial stages of operation, District staff will manually monitor chlorine residual in order to confine proper operation of the chlorine analyzers and compare manual reading to the analyzer values. Plant No. 2 (Sodium Hypochlorite [Bleach] Facility) The existing effluent bleach facilities will be used. The existing bleach facility is located in the southeast portion of Plant No. 2, approximately 150 feet west of the easterly property boundary near A and B digesters. The existing facilities were originally constructed for emergency disinfection of effluent, if it was ever necessary to disinfect emergency releases to the Santa Ana River. The facilities are functional. Minor upgrades and modifications for daily use are necessary. Additional piping is required as outlined in the 1999 Strategic Plan to feed other effluent discharge locations. The existing storage of 75,000 gallons (six 12,500-gallon tanks)is estimated to provide 4 days of bleach storage. Secondary spill containment for the tanks is already in place. The existing pumps will be used to pump the bleach from the tanks to the feed points. It is anticipated that multiple pumps will be required for normal operation and standby duty. Two feed points are required at Plant No. 2. Injection points for the bleach at the B and C side advanced primary treatment facilities and the secondary effluent discharge channel. Dosing at the B and C side primary effluent will be approximately 25 mg/L. Dosing at the secondary effluent channel will be approximately 2-5 mg/L. Additional piping from the existing bleach lines to the feed points will consist of CPVC plastic pipe, miscellaneous valves and fittings, and appurtenance. Chlorine diffusers will provide mixing into the flow stream. c w em�nnaza� wmmro.maere r+ ..'e eeuno m G.c Page 5 (Sodium Hypochlorite [Bleach] Delivery) Based on Plant No. 2 flows and dosing rates, bleach usage is expected to be about 18,800 gallons per day. This would require 4 to 5 tank truck deliveries daily, on average. The truck would enter and exit at the main plant entrance between Banning Avenue and Bushard Street. The truck route through the plant would be the East Perimeter Road to the existing bleach facility. (Sodium Bisulfte [Dechlorination Chemical] Facility) New sodium bisulfite facilities at Plant No. 2 will be required. The proposed location is just south of Surge Tower No. 2, Serial Discharge 001, adjacent to the property boundary. The required facilities consist of tankage based on 14 days of storage. The storage is anticipated to be in multiple tanks, possibly four to six units. Secondary spill containment for the tanks will be required and installed. Pumps for the sodium bisulfte will be required from the tanks to the feed point. It is anticipated that multiple pumps will be required for normal operation and standby duty. The final configuration of facilities will be verified. The injection point for the dechlorination chemical will be the long ocean outfall (discharge serial 001), approximately downstream of Surge Tower No. 2. Dosing will be at a rate of approximately 10 to 20 mg/L. Piping from the pumps to the feed point will consist of CPVC plastic pipe, miscellaneous valves and fittings, and appurtenance. Jet nozzles will provide mixing into the treated effluent flow stream. (Sodium Bisulfite [Dechlorinaticn Chemical] Delivery) Based on plant flows and dosing rates, sodium bisulfte usage is estimated to be about 9,965 gallons per day. This would require 2 to 3 tank-truck deliveries daily, on the average. The truck would enter and exit at the main plant entrance located between Banning Avenue and Bushard Street. The truck route through the plant would be the East Perimeter Road to the new dechlorination facility. (Chlorine Residual/Controls/Sampling) Residual chlorine will be monitored upstream of the Ocean Outfall Booster Station wetwell near each bleach addition point. Improvements may include new sample pump, piping and analyzer equipment. A second unit near Surge Tower No. 2 will be used to control or trim or optimize dechlorination chemical rates. In order to verify residual during the initial stages of operation, OCSD staff will manually monitor chlorine residual in order to confirm proper operation of the chlorine analyzers and compare manual reading to the analyzer values. The actual configuration of control technology will be determined during the design phase of this proposed work. c aye�ea Nv Ve®ee w � re Gm Page Additionally, the existing effluent sampler will be used to monitor the normal final effluent parameters. Sampling for residual chlorine and bisulfite will be added to the sampling protocol. These systems may be operated manually during the start-up and ramp-up periods. Controls and automated systems will be integrated into the CRISP treatment plant computer system. 5. Master Plan/Strategic Plan Requirements Although bacteria reduction of the treated wastewater released from the ocean ouffall is discussed, the Strategic Plan does not specifically address this short-term bacteria reduction effort. The existing bleach station is used for effluent disinfection for the Santa Ana River overflow location. Additional piping was strategically planned at Plant No. 2. Because this preferred alternative was not specifically covered the Strategic Plan or its adopted environmental impact report (EIR), an environmental review process must be completed on this proposed work to determine if impacts are significant. 6. Conceptual Plan Criteria Of the options investigated for the short-term bacteria reduction, bleach with dechlorination has been selected as the most feasible bacteria reduction method for the short-term bacteria reduction. Subsequent work will evaluate hydrogen peroxide and the combination of hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid as a bacteria reduction agent. Preliminary findings show that bleach added at the Plant No. 1 effluent junction box would provide a substantial reduction in bacteria, with low chlorine residual levels by the time it reaches Plant No. 2 via the interplant pipelines. There are currently no bacteria reduction facilities at Plant No. 1. Completely new facilities will need to be constructed. Preliminary findings indicate that the levels of bleach required to significantly reduce bacteria at the Plant No. 2 process discharges will require either additional contact time or the addition of dechlorination facilities, prior to discharge. Currently, OCSD has available bacteria reduction facilities at Plant No. 2 that could be used, in part, for the initial short-term bacteria reduction treatment. Additional facilities would be required for storage and distribution, in addition to the dechlorination facilities, if necessary. 7. Alternatives OCSD staff has conducted some bench-scale testing on ultraviolet light, ozone, and bleach alternatives. Early results indicated that ultraviolet light and bleach are feasible alternatives for reducing bacteria levels in the treated wastewater. Ozone did not appear feasible due to the high dose rate required to achieve bacteria kill associated with primary treatment. However, the combination of ultraviolet light and ozone could be considered an alternative. Ultraviolet light and ozone systems would require considerable plant modifications, requiring two probably three years to implement. G:bxpAWWMAhftK.B WMN� N .".O.O.Med. Page In addition, ultraviolet light and ozone would require additional laboratory and full-scale testing to determine design parameters for these alternatives. Therefore these alternatives are considered long-tens project alternatives. Bleach and dechlorination facilities could be installed over a 90 to 240 day period. Along with the practicality for bleach as a disinfectant, this alternative is the most feasible to implement. 8. Constraints and Special Considerations The study will determine the requirements to comply with CEQA as well as modify ocean discharge permit requirements (if any). 9. Bleach Toxicity and Chlorine Byproducts (Toxicity) The effect of chlorination and dechlorination on effluent toxicity is being investigated as part of the effluent disinfection study. Toxicity testing is being conducted using the same test methods and animals required in OCSD's NPDES permit compliance effluent monitoring program. In addition, two marine acute toxicity tests have been added for this study. These tests are likely to be included in OCSD's permit following approval by the Regional Water Control Board. To date,toxicity testing has been conducted twice, once on February 22-26, 2002, on effluent that was chlorinated, but not dechlorinated, and again on March 13-17, 2002, with the dechlorination step added. The initial testing showed significant effluent toxicity for all tests with chlorine residuals as low as 0.2 mg/L total chlorine. The testing on chlorinated-dechlorinated effluent showed very low effluent toxicity in all tests. While encouraging, these results cannot be considered conclusive. More testing is needed to verify these results. Additional testing will be conducted as this study continues. (Chemical Analysis) Two series of tests were conducted on the final effluent to determine the impacts of chlorination on the chemical parameters routinely monitored for compliance with the Districts NPDES Permit. Bleach was added to composite effluent samples ranging from 5 mg/L to 20 mg/L chlorine. With all tests, 60% - 70% of the dosed chlorine was converted to mono and dichloroamine. The majority of the remainder of the chlorine was consumed in the creation of organochlorine compounds that were mostly not measurable. In all but one study, approximately 0.1 mg/L of residual chlorine was present after 20 minutes. The dose rate of 1.5 mg/L sodium bisulfite to 1 mg/L chlorine was effective in immediately dechlorinating the effluent. Trace amounts of mono and dichloroamine (approximately 0.1 mg/L)did reform in the majority of the tests. There was a slight depression in the dissolved oxygen in all the tests. This suggests that studies should be conducted to determine if a lower ratio could be used for the dechlorination process. c a u..�a A.mGaa Page There is no clear-cut indication of the impact of chlorination/dechlorination on effluent ammonia levels. Some tests indicated an increase in the level of ammonia in the sample and others showed no net gain. This could be an artifact of the testing but further testing is necessary. There was also an increase in some heavy metals. In subsequent testing, the bleach solution used for spiking will be tested to determine if this increase is due to metal contaminants contained in the bleach. All parameters tested remained within permit requirements after chlorination and dechlorination. 10.Cost Estimates The estimated costs for implementing the short-term bacteria reduction alternatives are: AlEeruaBve C8'$a1lGost ">-: =XGinrielYQ raLri Cost Bleach with Dechlor $4,000,000 $7,000,000 Ultraviolet Light $40,000,000 $4,200,000 Ozone/UV Light $47,000,000 $3,500,000 Note 1: Ozone/UV Light Alternative: Ozone could be used for secondary treated effluent along with UV Light for advanced primary treated effluent. Note 2: Only chemicals, supplies, and materials are indicated for the annual operating cost. A detailed labor analysis will need to be prepared as part of the long-term project study. The present values for bleach with dechlorination, ultraviolet light, and ozone with ultraviolet light systems are $58,054,000, $72,432,000, and $74,027,000, respectively. These present values are based on a 10-year life. A detailed breakdown of the capital budget requirements for the Bleach alternative is as follows: Phase D'esdrt tion Amount:$ . 1. Development 15,000 2. Studies 80,000 3. Detailed Concepts and Drawings 450,000 4. Construction Contract 2,400,000 5. Construction Admin. 75,000 6. Construction Inspection 25 000 7. Ocean Monitoring 1000 8. Record Drawings 25,000 g. Contingency 430,000 Total 4.000,000 11.Permittino Requirements OCSD will determine implications, if any, associated with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (Ocean Discharge) permits modification requirements. GA"AWWMB2P unWECCMND1 &a RWuCU0 pojecl de ptw rev GAOL Pages 12.Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Requirements Environmental information is being reviewed and CEQA requirements will be developed prior to installation of new facilities. The Engineering and Technical Services departments, along with the OCSD environmental consultants are reviewing the CEQA-related requirements for this preferred alternative. A contract for conducting the CEQA study has been issued and is the review work is in progress. 13.Implementation/Schedule Possible implementation schedules are shown below as conceptual information only. The milestones indicated are not necessarily part of the study effort at this time. In addition, two alternative schedules are provided in order to indicate the wide range of dates associated with final implementation of any project. Based on an Environmental Impact Report not being required, otherwise known as a Negative Declaration (No significant impacts identified which cannot be mitigated through design or operation): CEQA Process, Ocean Discharge Permit modification June 27, 2002 OCSD Board of Directors Adopt Environmental Documents June 27,2002 Development of Detailed Concepts June 10, 2002 Bid and Award Construction June 27,2002 Construction Completion August 30, 2002 Start-up, Calibration, Debughroubleshoot Sept 30, 2002 Ramp up, Complete Project, and Record Drawings Oct 30, 2002 Based on full Environmental Impact Report (Significant impacts identified which cannot be mitigated through design or operation): �-r =; " Iterri t f afeila ' s CEQA Process, Ocean Discharge Permit modification March 27, 2003 OCSD Board of Directors Adopt Environmental Documents March 26, 2003 Development& Design Aril 23,2003 Bid and Award Construction May 28, 2003 Construction Completion July 31, 2003 Start-up, Calibration, Debughroubleshocit Aug31, 2003 Ramp up, Complete Project, and Record Drawings Se t 30, 2003 14.Attachment Chlorine Disinfection Study Toxicity Results cew.aa�[wu�vvewmar+eaceon pqm a .nmcem Page 10 e Chlorine Disinfection Study Toxicity Results As part of the effluent disinfection project, effluent toxicity is being studied to insure that both permit compliance and environmental protection will be maintained as the District plans and implements effluent chlorine disinfection. At the direction of District staff,testing is being conducted by Aquatic Testing Laboratories, Inc. (Ventura, CA)using the suite of tests/species required in the District's NPDES permit. In addition,two marine acute tests, not currently required, are included in the study. The list of test species and methods used are listed in Table 1). Table 1. Testspecies and methods. Species TestType Method Permit Required? Fathead Minnow (fish) Freshwater EPA/600/4-90/027F Yes Pima hales pfumelus Acute Water Flea Freshwater EPA/600/4-90/027F Yes Cerioda hnia dubia Acute Silverside (fish) Marine EPA/600/4-90/027F No Menidia be Mina Acute Mysid Shrimp Marine EPA1600/4-90/027F No Mysidopsis bahia Acute Red Abalone Marine EPA/600/R-95-136 Yes Haliotis rufescens Chronic Purple Sea Urchin Marine EPA/600/R-95-136 Yes Strongylocentrotus Chronic purpuratus Two toxicity-testing events have occurred to date. The first occurred February 22-26, 2002. The purpose of this test event was to assess the potential toxicity of three possible chlorination dose rates. Testing consisted of dosing District's final effluent to 2, 4, and 6 mg/L chlorine, waiting 60 minutes (the projected contact time), then initiating toxicity testing. The results showed significant toxicity at all doses tested for all species except the red abalone marine chronic test (all doses)and the Menidia marine acute test for the 2 mg/L C12 dose (Table 2). Following the first round of testing, it was decided that dechlorination would be added to the process. The second event occurred March 13-17, 2002, and focused on potential dose rates with dechlorination added. The dose rates tested were 5, 10, and 15 mg/L Cl2 followed by dechlorination with sodium bisulfte after a 20-minute contact period. No significant effluent toxicity was detected in any of the tests. There was low, sporadic mortality in the fathead minnow and silverside tests at the highest test concentration (56% effluent). Results are presented in Table 3. Due to a miscommunication with ATL, the highest effluent concentration tested in the freshwater acute tests was 56% I 4 effluent; it should have been 100% effluent. Consequently, it is not known if the permit toxicity limit for the fathead minnow test was met in this round of tests. However, all other tests, freshwater and marine did meet permit, or projected (marine acute), effluent toxicity limits. Effluent toxicity testing continues as chlorinelsodium bisulfite doses are adjusted to meet project goals. Table 2. Results of the February 22, 2002 Sampling Event. Permit limits: Freshwater Acute TUa = 1.50 Marine Acute TUa = 5.53, TUc = 181. Species Test Type 2 m A.Cl, 4 m IL C12 6 Mal&CI LC50FTUcNOEC 0 TUa LC50 TUa Fathead FNV 13A% 11.3 5.3% 18.7 Minnow Acute Water F/W <12.5% % >8.0 <12.5% >8.0 Flea Acute Siverside Marine 31.8% % 10.2 8.2% 12.1 Acute NOECC TUc NOEC TUc Red Marine 18% % 55.6 1.0% 100 Abalone Chronic Purple Marine Sea Chronic <0.16% 6% >625 <0.16% >825 Urchin Table 3. Results of the March 13, 2002 Sampling Event. Permit limits: Freshwater Acute TUa = 1.50, Marine Acute TUa= 5.53, TUc = 181. Species Test Type 0 m L C12 1 5 m L Cl. 10 m IL C12 I 15 m L Cl, LC50 TUa I LC50 I TUa LC50 TUa LC50 TUa Fathead F/w Acute >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 Minnow Water Flea FAN Acute >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 Siverside Marine >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 >50% <1.8 Acute Mysid Marine >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 >56% <1.8 Shrimp Acute NOEC TUc NOEC TUc NOEC TUc NOEC TUc Red Marine 1.8% 65.6 1.8% 55.6 1.8% 55.6 1.8% 55.6 Abalone Chronic Purple Sea Marine 1.0% 65.6 1.8% 1 55.6 1.8% 1 55.6 1.8% 55.6 Urchin Chronic G:lwpAta4s%2MA=n np.BChl=Inaeon%ToAdty Results Summary 031802.doc BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of D". 3/27/02 AGENDA REPORT Item NumberItem Number to Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Mike Larkin, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR SHORT-TERM OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION, JOB NO. J-87 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Award a Sole Source Professional Services Agreement with Black &Veatch Corporation for engineering feasibility and planning services for Short-Term Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, for an amount not to exceed $447,920. The information produced pursuant to this Agreement will assist the District in determining the options available for bacteria reduction. The Staff will return to the Board of Directors with a final recommendation for a Bacteria-Reduction Project in the near future. SUMMARY • During the February Board Meeting, the Board of Directors approved staff to spend no more than $200,000 for engineering services associated with the planning of short-term bacteria-reduction facilities. • The Professional Services Agreement contract amount required to refine the short- term options and evaluate a Preferred Alternative in detail is $447,920. • Staff has authorized Black&Veatch to proceed with advanced planning in order to fully understand the proposed changes that will be needed, provided not more than $200,000 is spent. • In order to proceed with the detailed refinement, a contract not to exceed $447,920 for engineering services must be approved. • Staff is requesting the Board approve the sole-source contract with Black& Veatch for said services. Sole source to Black& Veatch is recommended because of several factors identified under Additional Information, below. • Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)found in February that the ocean discharge plume was closer to the beach and surface water and at higher concentrations than previously observed. As a result, the District is reviewing methods to reduce the bacteria level being discharged to the Ocean. • To accomplish this review, staff recommends that a detailed plan be prepared for facilities at both Plant Nos. 1 and 2. • A Professional Services Agreement is needed for the preparation of necessary plans and refine the Preferred Alternative so that it can be implemented after completing the necessary compliance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). • A team of District engineers and managers has reviewed and evaluated the options for selecting a Consulting Engineering Firm to accomplish the work within the overall time constraints associated with this concept. The result of the evaluation has determined that since time is of the essence,the work needs to be sole sourced. • To achieve this time schedule, a sole source contract has been identified as the preferred method for procurement of engineering services. • Staff recommends the award of the Short-Term Outfall Bacteria Reduction Facilities Design to Black& Veatch. The work includes preparation of detailed plans and specifications for a Preferred Alternative (Bleach Facilities at Plant No. 1, Dechlorination Facilities at Plant No. 2, Installation of Monitoring Equipment at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Installation of Additional Bleach Piping at Plant No. 2, and associated ancillary improvements). PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The engineering services will not exceed $447,920. This Professional Services Agreement is an anticipated expense and there is sufficient funding for this agreement. The fee proposal was reviewed and negotiated by the Engineering Department as well as the 0&M Department management. The fee is considered reasonable for the proposed Scope of Work. The concept was not included in the 2001/02 Budget and will be budgeted during the upcoming budget cycle. Due to delays in outlay for other capital projects, there are sufficient funds to cover the costs during this fiscal year. G%agad `apenda�gaam Agenda ReMW V0gz BMW Agenda RepMeaaa3=em to J4IEx Rensed. MOO Page 2 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION To achieve the implementation of the Short-Term Ouffall Bacteria-Reduction Program, the following proposed and existing facilities at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 will be required and designated as the Preferred Alternative for purposes of CEQA compliance: A. Chlorination Facility at Plant No. 1 (Proposed) B. Chlorination Facility at Plant No. 2 (Existing) C. Dechlorination Facility at Plant No. 2 (Proposed) D. Piping Additions associated with the Chlorination Facility at Plant No. 2 (Proposed) E. Chlorination Analyzers at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 (Proposed) Staff selected Black & Veatch because of their unique professional qualifications in concert with OCSD's needs. Their qualifications included a through understanding of existing plant bleach facilities which were recently designed by them, District standards, facility requirements, national expertise, and availability to complete the work within the limited time available. The proposed team that Black and Veatch has proposed is consistent with their capabilities and understanding of the existing facilities. ALTERNATIVES The potential alternatives are not to complete feasibility studies for a bacteria-reduction plan or to designate other methods of bacterial reduction as a Preferred Alternative (Ultraviolet Light or Ozonation). NOTE: The latter methods are being studies as part of the Strategic Plan update. CEQA FINDINGS The action proposed comprises part of the District's feasibility studies for which CEQA action is not required. The Staff will be returning to the Board of Directors in the near future with recommendations regarding whether to proceed with a bacteria-reduction project. These recommendations will include environmental review in accordance with CEQA, focusing on the Preferred Alternative designated by the Board of Directors. ATTACHMENTS None a nl�wewi m MAWm aeoan.wxrviem,e.i47.m ern : e 1 Page 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dr. 3/27/ AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe Ben Number 9 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: John Weingarden, Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services budget allocation of $300,000, raising the total budgeted amount from$1,000,000 to $1,300,000 for the remainder of FY 01-02. SUMMARY FAHR Item 99-50, approved in June 1999, established $1,000,000 annually in funding for temporary employment services for five subsequent years. Because this initial staff recommendation to FAHR limited the total amount of the temporary services budget to $1,000,000 it did not accurately reflect the needs of the District in FY 99-00, and a shortfall to the temporary services budget occurred. Subsequently, FAHR Item 0045, approved in May 2000, was presented to request additional funding to cover the shortage during FY 00-01 for temporary services supporting the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and to provide a forecast for additional funds for the next three years. A total cost of$3,370,000 was forecast for FY 01-02, and was to be proposed and approved as needed. During the first quarter of FY W-02, a proposal to transition to a new Operational Model for Engineering support was made. At that time staff began development of a Professional Services Agreement(PSA) based on General Counsel's recommendations. Therefore the$1,000,000 Temporary Services Budget for FY 01-02 was anticipated to be adequate to cover the non-capital temporary labor costs,which would remain relatively constant. However, the unanticipated Huntington Beach Study began in May 2001, and continued into the current fiscal year. In December 2001, $810,000 had been spent for temporary labor. Capital projects accounted for 50.2%G of this, as the PSA had not yet been implemented; therefore, a shortfall of$300,000 to the temporary services budget is anticipated. Regular temporary resources will also continue to be required in Customer and Network Support, Programming and Database Systems, Process Control Integration Divisions, and administrative support. Additionally, regular temporary staffing funds were expended by approximately$80,000 due to the unanticipated temporary services requirements for the Huntington Beach Study. This amount reduced the total temporary budget by 8%. This unforeseen project impacted the amount originally budgeted for administrative temporary staffing, and added to the premature depletion of the original $1,000,000. Gll U.penEaNa,rE IRTmpSem¢s.aoc R_. mom Page 1 The transition to the PSA, as well as the utilization of Limited Term Contract Engineers should allow the expenses associated with temporary staffing to remain within the established $1,000,000 temporary budget in subsequent years. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See attachments. ALTERNATIVES 1) Deny the request and discontinue the use of temporary employment services. 2) Hire full time regular employees on Limited Tenn Contracts to support a Division through a peak period. Limited term employees are regular full time employees placed on contracts with a specific end date. These employees, during the duration of their contracts, would be entitled to all benefits and provisions of regular full time employees. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS FAHR Item Number FAHR99-50 FAHR Item Number FAHR0045 G ro cuuyenmm.ra Ppefaa Reports B ra RexiM MC�p Page 2 FAHRCOMMITTEE Mee/Hns/iwUo srzalpiJate ToiaoaorUlr. • ' AGENDA REPORT Dan Wnm aem NUmbU _ FAHROU-4 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Acting Director of Human Resources Originator: John Weingarden, Human Resources Analyst Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase to the Temporary Employment Services total contracts by $200,000, from $1,000,000 to $1,200,000 for remainder of Fiscal Year 99-00, and approve funding in the amount of$2,402,000 for Fiscal Year 00-01. SUMMARY Temporary services for the District are comprised of both capital and non-capital projects. 15%of the temp needs are non-capital and 85% are capital. Additional temporary staffing is required as a result of a peak in capital improvement projects outlay during the five-year period through fiscal year 2004. This need for capital-related temporary services is in addition to the need for services for daily operations at the District. The need for temporary services to support the projected future capital improvement program was discussed with and approved by the PDC Committee in April 1999 (see attached). The Temporary Employment Services Agenda Item, FAHR99-50, approved by the FAHR Committee, estimated $1,000,000 per year cap on all temporary employment services for the District, included capital as well as non-capital related temporary services. We anticipate a $200,000 shortfall for this fiscal year. As the capital improvement program continues to increase over the next four years, capital- related temporary services for engineering, inspection, and support services will need to be increased. Based on the current capital-improvement program/outlay schedule, the District will need an additional $200,000 in temporary employment services for FY 99-00, including non-capital related temporary employment services. For FY 00-01 this amount is anticipated to increase to $2,402,000 and may reach a high of$3,870,000 FY 02-03. The increase in capital-related resource needs is a result of capital projects that will move from the design process to the construction phase. As the design work moves to the construction phase, additional staff will be needed. The cost of the capital-related temporary services will be paid by the capital project budget. These costs do not impact the cost per million gallons. Staff is recommending the above-described increases in Temporary Employment Services. Staff recognizes that the degree of escalating costs associated with temporary contract service-workers are unexpected, and previously not forecasted. For this reason, we will G Wp.Ulayp¢MeFW1RVRMq]roT]0.tlggp,Ep Rapo�aFWIRWdS Erc Rw . veom Page 1 be conducting a cost analysis during the first half of FY 00-01 to accurately address the advantage of regular employees verses contract service workers. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Year Capital I Non-Capital I Total 99-00 $ 970,000 $230,000 $1,200,000 00-01 2,125,000 277,000 $2,402,000 01 —02 3,095, 000 275,000 $3,370,000 02-03 3,595,000 275,000 $3,870,000 03-04 2,475,000 275,000 $2,750,000 ` For information only, funding amounts to be proposed and approved in subsequent Fiscal Years. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Discussion The District's staff has recognized a significant need for contract-service workers due to an increase in capital projects for the next five years. Our capital improvement project budget is expected to increase from $70,000,000 today to $198,700,000 by fiscal year 2005. As information, this capital outlay represents over 180 various projects throughout the treatment and collections facility. Most of these projects were identified in the Strategic Plan adopted by the Board in 1999. Other projects are added to the CIP that have been identified by staff and recommended by the EMT and the General Manager. The projected capital outlay for fiscal year 2000-01 is $83,007,000. In April 1999, the Engineering Department presented a program to the PDC Committee that would provide contract-service worker resources to conduct the capital project work. The proposed program consisted of hiring contract-engineering services during the associated five-year peak capital outlay period. FAHR Item 99-50, in June 1999. requested $1,000,000 in funding for temporary employment services which included the proposed capital improvement contract engineering staff. Due to the fact that the staff recommendation to FAHR included the contract engineering services staff for the capital-related program, as well as non-capital related temporary services, the $1,000,000 did not accurately reflect the needs of the District. The purpose of this agenda item is to request additional funding to cover the shortage during the current fiscal year for temporary services supporting the CIP, and to provide a forecast for additional funds for the next three years. (These amounts will be subject to approval by the board when the budget for each of those three years are adopted each June.) G:1vy.M0%gBMeTAHR,G�A nE R.MO SFAHR( 5Gx RnWeEN. Wma Page 2 As the capital improvement program activities ramp up, additional contract-services will be required for project management, design, reviews, coordination, and inspection. For example, as the current design projects move into construction, additional construction engineers and inspectors must be obtained. Staff has estimated that additional contract service-workers will ultimately be required for capital-related activities. These additional temporary resources will be required in the Design, Process Engineering, Construction, Customer and Network Support, Programming and Database Systems and the Process Control Integration Divisions. The increase in capital outlay has impacted the O&M Department as a result of coordinating capital activities with the Engineering Department, reviewing construction plans and specifications, developing facility process-control strategy for the new projects, planning for construction sequencing and connections to existing facilities, assisting with plant start-ups and shut-downs, visiting various collection and treatment plant sites with consultants, attending meetings, arranging for sewer flow monitoring and/or video taping as required by capital project needs, and coordination between capital activities and ongoing treatment plant operations. In addition, the temporary engineering resources will be used to ensure field staff safety, for locating utilities, and for reviewing designs for operability and maintenance friendliness. The O&M Department currently has one contract-engineer in the Process Engineering Division to support the treatment plant capital improvement program and requires a second to provide support for the collections system capital program. The requirements for Information Technology related services and support continue to rise above the Department's current resource level. Many of these requirements are short-term or project oriented and can be met by augmenting permanent staff with temporary contract support. This strategy gives Information Technology the flexibility to manage its peak workloads associated with programming, analysis, project management, and hardware/software support. Further, this strategy will provide Information Technology with the temporary staff required to support the increased volume of capital project work now going into design. Fundin Funding for capital improvement contract service-workers is already recognized through the particular capital project being worked on, and is budgeted by the particular capital budget process. The temporary service-worker contracts for operating requirements are budgeted within the Operating Fund. ALTERNATIVES 1) Deny the request and put certain projects on hold. 2) Hire full time regular employees on Limited Tenn Contracts to support a Division through a peak period. Limited term employees are regular full time employees placed on contracts with a specific end date. These employees, during the duration of their contracts, would be entitled to all benefits and provisions of regular full time employees. GMEubi^^yY/JIR,FPNRlttV3W]PgnYe ReP"k1FPNR e R°"°°°. e¢ase Page 3 CEQA FINDINGS - Not applicable. S ATTACHMENTS FAHR Item Number FAHR99-50 PDC Item Number PDC99-20 G:Yry,dto%gondOAHR\FAHMM01 0R -dn R'po 'TAHR00A5 E m Page RwisaO: 620198 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date Tosa.ofor. { AGENDA REPORT ' Number Rom Number 50 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Award contracts for Temporary Employment Services (Specification No. P-186) to the following support staffing firms for a period of one year, renewable for a period of four years, and cancelable at any time, for a total amount not to exceed $1 million: General Agency • Apple One Technical Agencies • Principal Technical Services, Inc. - Engineering and IT Personnel • EPC Consultants, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • DDB Engineering, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Two Roads Professional Resources, Inc. - Engineering Personnel • Project Partners - Engineering Personnel • Tek Systems - IT Personnel • Lab Support - Laboratory personnel 2. Authorize staff to enter into additional agreements with other temporary firms as they become known to District's staff, provided it is within budget guidelines. SUMMARY The District has typically had short-term, low-volume temporary staffing needs and has contracted with one or two agencies to fulfill them. However, temporary staffing utilization is increasing with additional Engineering and IT projects. Since the increase in temporary costs exceeds $100,000, Board approval is needed. Three-quarters of the District's temporary labor needs are due to the increase in capital projects for the next five years. The Engineering department has already obtained approval from the Planning and Design Committee for the increase in the temporary staffing budget and will continue to provide the PDC with regular updates. Human Resources has interviewed each company listed in the recommendation and is satisfied that they can meet administrative requirements of doing business with the District. In the General Agency category, Apple One has agreed to a 40-50% markup rate for general, clerical, and light industrial staffing. Other companies have been used G:Mvmet•P^�eFNIR6aysa.54M1uR9950.ad R" Page 1 in the past, but only Apple One has been able to consistently supply the District with high quality temporary employees. I( The technical firms work a little differently than the general temporary agencies. Instead of negotiating a markup rate up front, the Engineering and IT departments plan to put temporary staffing opportunities out to all of the qualified firms above and have them compete against each other for each assignment. Those companies who find the most qualified candidate at the lowest price will be selected on a case-by-case basis. Instead of listing out all of the requirements that the temporary staffing firms need in order to do business with the District, a copy of the District's generic temporary services contract is attached. Each company will need to sign it, or one like it, and agree to the proper insurance and employment practices. Because there may be other technical agencies we wish to use, and because the posting of the jobs will be an openly competitive process, staff is asking for the authority to enter into similar agreements with other agencies without having to return to the Board to approve each agency. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not to exceed $1 million BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: J.O. Contractual Services and Capital Improvement Budgets) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Hire additional regular, full-time employees for an indefinite period or on a contractual basis. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Sample generic Temporary Services Contract G\wp Ca1o�nCa V N1 RY99ofSAHP9350.rof Page 2 �I MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT February 11, 2002. 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on February 11, 2002. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Brian Donahue Iry Pickier, Chairman Russell Patterson Phil Anthony Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Larry Kraemer Jr. Laurann Cook, Alternate No. 2 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Brett Franklin, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Staff: Directors: Kelli Bum-Roy, Bruce Chalmers, Dick Corneille, Blake Anderson Jan Debay —Camp Dresser& McKee Jim Herberg Wes Bannister Annette McCluskey— NCG Porter Novelli Lisa Murphy Denis Bilodeau Debra Bums— DDB Engineering Bob Ooten Jerry King Randy Hunter— Earth Tech, Inc. Wendy Sevenandt Staff: John Collins—City of Fountain Valley Steven Conklin Abdul Rashidi, Bill Butler Counsel: Joanne Daugherty — Montgomery Watson Harza Brad Hogin Tom Dawes Dennis MacLain—City of Huntington Beach Shivaji Deshmukh Bob Finn —Brown & Caldwell Bill Everest Jill Everhart Jenny Glasser Clark Ida John Kennedy Mike Markus Katherine O'Connor Mehul Patel Lily Pham Laura Thomas Ron Wildermuth CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Meeting Upon motion by Director Donahue seconded by Director Anderson and carried, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held January 28, 2001 were - 11 - r e. Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes February 11, 2002 approved as corrected. Director Anthony requested that the January 28, 2002 Minutes reflect his request to incorporate a paragraph into the O&M Agreement regarding future contaminants. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Approve Authorization of Expenses for Visiting Professor Program Manager Tom Dawes reported that Dr. Rafael Mujeriego, Ph.D., a professor of civil engineering in Spain, will be on a sabbatical this year and has offered to work on the project without salary. He reported that Dr. Mujeriego is a Berkeley graduate, expert in water quality issues, would help in the Title 22 certification process with the Department of Health Services, and be involved in UV trials and testing that will begin soon. He recommends compensation for apartment rental be approved for the months Dr. Mujeriego spends on the project. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Patterson and carried, the Committee recommended approval to pay apartment rental expenses for Dr. Rafael Mujeriego, Ph.D., for one year, in an amount not to exceed $1,500 per month, $18,000 maximum, for months that he works on the project. 3. Recruitment of Additional Proiect Management Staff for Process Instrumentation, Control and Information Systems. Mr. Dawes reported that an additional staff person is needed for the process instrumentation and controls design and information systems and that after the agenda was mailed, OCWD operations staff person, Jay Kalinowski, offered his full time services and that he would work under the direction of OCWD Engineer Laura Thomas. He reported that this position has been budgeted and that there is a critical need for an additional person. After discussion the following action was taken. Upon motion by Director Patterson, seconded by Director Kraemer and carried, the Committee approved transfer of OCWD employee Jay Kalinowski as a staff person to provide additional support in managing the process instrumentation, control and information system elements of the project. - 2 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes February 11, 2002 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 4. Groundwater Replenishment System Progress Report Mr. Dawes reported that staff would be giving an update and overview of project organization, design and construction contracts, security plan, process controls and finance. He reported that 150-200 people work on the project and noted that a multi- level review and decision approach is used and that communication is the key. Mr. Dick Corneille, Camp Dresser& McKee, reviewed CDM key staffs major responsibilities and the principal consultants' responsibilities, which includes mechanical, structural, and electrical responsibilities. He gave an update and status on the MF and UV pre-selection proposals, site preparation contracts, the advanced water treatment facilities contract, barrier facilities contracts, and the GW R Pipeline contracts and other design services and studies. Mr. Dawes reported that two external reviews are used for the project-the State Water Resources Control Board Revolving Fund loan program, the value engineering studies, and the Independent Technical Review Committee. He also reported that geotechnical studies have been completed and that those reports and several others are on display on the table. He reported that design submittals and policy issues are reviewed by staff, the technical advisory team, the management advisory team,which includes the general managers, and then to this Committee. He noted that a four-day workshop will be held next week for the design submittal for the advanced water treatment facilities. Director Anthony requested that the security, process control systems and financial update be brought back to the Committee at a later date. 5. Public Information and Education Update OCWD Public Information Officer Ron Wildermuth reported that a Public Information & Education meeting is scheduled for February 26 to discuss the findings of the research analysis of the telephone survey conducted by NCG Porter Novelli. He reported that the survey found encouraging comments from those surveyed; that water quality is more important than cost; the lower the socioeconomic level, the less awareness of the project; and cable TV and mailers are additional avenues for reaching people. He reported that a lunch and tour for city public information officers will be held on February 28 and a neighborhood open house will be held on March 12. 6. Status Report a. Tenant Relocation. Mr. Dawes reported that staff has contacted the Baptist Church on Ellis Avenue regarding purchase of a well site for three wells within their parking lot. He reported the church has requested the same amount of money for purchase as - 3 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes February 11, 2002 was allocated for the house at 8161 Ellis Avenue. He reported that $150,000 would be saved, as we would not have to pay for relocation or demolition. b. OCWD Direct Access Power Contract with AES NewEnergy. Mr. Dawes reported that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has moved to void contracts retroactive to OCW D's July contract issue date at the CPUC board meeting scheduled for February 21 and that staff is continuing to monitor these proceedings. c. City of Santa Ana Mr. Dawes reported that the City has planned two meetings this month to advise homeowners about 1) the bike-jogging trail that will be detoured into their areas; and 2) to ten homeowners that have encroached on city property and are located on the proposed detoured bike/pedestrian trail. The city will be meeting with homeowners on February 25 and 26, respectively, to discuss these issues. d. Value Engineering Report Mr. Dawes reported that Part 1 of the 70% Value Engineering Study is complete and that the report suggests relocation of a portion of pipeline from Carbon Canyon Diversion to Anaheim city streets, which could save about $1 million. He recommended that an approval to transfer funds from the GWR Pipeline funds to Camp Dresser & McKee Addendum No. 5 be approved for this alternative at a cost of $9,000. Director Anthony requested that this item be brought back as an action item at the next meeting. Director Anderson asked staff to be diligent in their dealings with Anaheim. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 7. Acquisition of 9061 Ellis Avenue for Barrier Wells No Discussion. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Patterson and carried, approval was given to: A.) Increase the authorization for purchase of property at 8061 Ellis Avenue from $245,000 to an amount not to exceed $247, 486.50 for escrow expenses; and B.) Authorize the OCWD general manager to pay normal and reasonable escrow costs on all future property acquisitions. - 4 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes February 11,2002 Ms. Kelli Burn-Roy, Camp Dresser& McKee, reported that this project has been selected to receive the "Outstanding Project Study Award"from the Orange County Engineering Council and will presented on February 23 at the Hyatt Regency in Anaheim from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and that she will be the keynote speaker. Director Pickler introduced and welcomed Ms. Laurann Cook, Mayor of Fountain Valley, and a new Orange County Sanitation District board member who will also serve as OCSD's Alternate No. 2 on the Joint Cooperative Committee. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, February 25 at 5:30 p.m. and the regular meeting is scheduled for March 11 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. - 5 - MINUTES OF MEETING OF JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT February 25, 2002, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System was held in the Boardroom of the OCWD offices at 5:30 p.m. on February 25, 2002. Members of the Committee present were: OCSD Directors OCWD Directors Norm Eckenrode Iry Pickier, Chairman Brian Donahue Phil Anthony Russell Patterson Larry Kraemer Jr. Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 1 Kathryn Barr, Alternate No. 1 Laurann Cook, Alternate No. 2 Brian Brady, Alternate No. 3 Staff and others in attendance were: OCSD OCWD Others Directors Directors: Kelli Bum-Roy—Camp Dresser& McKee Paul Walker Jan Debay Debra Bums— DDB Engineering Staff: Wes Bannister John Collins— City of Fountain Valley David Ludwin Denis Bilodeau Bill Butler— Montgomery Watson Harza Jim Herberg Jerry King Dennis MacLain—City of Huntington Beach Lisa Murphy Staff: Bob Finn— Brown & Caldwell Wendy Sevenandt Bill Mills Terry Lane—City of Garden Grove Joanne Daugherty Thom Coughran —City of Santa Ana Counsel: Tom Dawes Brad Hogin Shivaji Deshmukh Bill Everest Jenny Glasser John Kennedy Mike Markus Mehul Patel Lily Pham Laura Thomas Greg Woodside CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Meetinc Upon motion by Director Anthony seconded by Director Donahue and carried with Director Eckenrode abstaining, the minutes of the Joint Cooperative Committee meeting held February 11, 2002 were approved as mailed. - 1 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes February 25.2002 MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Authorization to Proceed with Alternative Alignment Studies for Portions of the Groundwater Replenishment Pipeline Unit III and Southeast Barrier Pipelines Program Manager Tom Dawes reported that staff is requesting authority to proceed with studies for portions of the following two projects: GWR Unit III Pipeline and Southeast Barrier Pipeline. Our recently completed Value Engineering study recommended consideration of an alignment change for the GWR Unit III Pipeline between from the Santa Ana River and Kraemer Basin to a street alignment using Kraemer Avenue and Miraloma Avenue instead of the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel. The cost of the study to determine the feasibility of the alignment change is $9,000. Mr. Dawes also stated that negotiations with Pegasus School have stalled on compensation for the easement on the school site. Staff would like to research the feasibility of adjusting the alignment of the Southeast Barrier Pipeline and relocating two injection wells to avoid the Pegasus School site. The cost of this study would be $5,000. Upon motion by Director Anthony, seconded by Director Patterson and carried, authorization was given to proceed with alternate alignment studies for the Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel segment of the Groundwater Replenishment Unit III Pipeline and the portion of the Southeast Barrier Pipeline through Pegasus School for an amount not to exceed $14,000. This work will be included in Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Service Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 3. Groundwater Replenishment System Progress Report Continuation Mr. Dawes reported that staff would give an update and overview of the projects security plan, process controls, financial update, and introduced Debra Burris who was initiating the Progress Report. Debra Burris, GWR System Project Coordinator, described the five elements in the Security Plan including walls and fences; identification badges; camera surveillance; guardhouse at the entrance for site access control; and OCW D/OCSD Security Task Force. She also confirmed that the budget has already been approved for this Security Plan. Laura Thomas, GWR System Electrical Engineer, reported on the Process Control System. She described the process control components (controllers, servers, software, field devices), and gave a process control system overview. It is estimated - 2 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes February 25. 2002 there will be 6000 data 1/0 (information in / information out) in Phase I, and more than 8000 data 1/0 in Phase III that will control operation of the project. Director Patterson suggested that we should investigate the availability of funding possibly from the Federal Office of Homeland Security for implementation of the Security Plan. Mr. Dawes said that staff would check on this. Wendy Sevenandt, OCSD Project Manager, gave a financial update on the GWR System. Although the total capital cost has increased from $352 million in December 2000 to $367.8 million in December 2001, the average annual operation and maintenance cost, and average unit cost has remained stable at $22 million per year and $424 per acre-foot respectively. She also reported that the GWR Team is working on the Addendum No. 5 with CDM which will include a required cost of living adjustment per their Agreement. Ms. Sevenandt noted that future cost impacts could include a Visitor Center and an OCW D Laboratory. She stated that OCSD is preparing options and planning level estimates to better assess the financial impact of diverting Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI)flows to Plant No. 2 and provide the required volume of secondary effluent for the GWR System. That means OCSD may divert flows tributary to Plant No. 2 to Plant No. 1 to make up for low night-time flow in Phase 1; focus major planning concerns to handle peak flows within the collection system and treatment facilities; and provide source water without SARI flows co-mingled at either treatment facility. She stated the estimated capital cost for the Phase 1 project is being updated in April 2002 and will be brought back to the Committee. 4. Status Report a. Public Education Pro-gram. OCSD Communications Manager Lisa Murphy reported that Public Information representatives from cities in North Orange County will be briefed on the GWR System on Thursday, February 28, and that a neighborhood open house is scheduled on March 12, 2002 about the GWR System at OCWD. b. Property Acquisition Mr. Dawes gave an overview regarding the location and status of the eight GWR System injection wells. He reviewed the easement negotiation on the Fountain Valley Elementary School District site leased to Pegasus School and current negotiation problems with it He stated that we are developing an alternate plan if we cannot successfully negotiate with Pegasus School. -3 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes February 25, 2002 c. GWR Pipeline in River View Golf Course A meeting with adjacent property owners affected by the bike trail relocation was held tonight. We will present the results at later Committee meeting. d. OCW D Direct Access Power Contract with AES NewEneray. Mr. Dawes stated that the California Public Utilities Commission has scheduled, and delayed, a revisit of"direct access" power contracts. We will continue to monitor the PUC on this topic. e. Waste Discharge Permit for Water Factory 21 and Interim Water Factory 21 Mr. Dawes reported that an application for a revised Waste Discharge Permit for Water Factory(WF) 21 has been submitted reflecting the interim operation during GWR System construction using microfilters. Director Anthony requested a copy of the application. f. Trailer Complex Mr. Dawes stated that construction has begun on the temporary office trailer complex. g. Design Workshop Mr. Bill Everest, OCWD Associate General Manager, briefly summarized the results of the 40% Advanced Water Treatment Facilities Design Submittal (DS) workshop which was held from February 19 to February 21, 2002. -He mentioned that the DS workshop successfully completed a full multidiscipline review of the design, and reviewed the procedure used by staff for the review. h. Department of Health Services (DHS) concems on Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI)Wastewater Mr. Everest informed that a workshop with DHS is scheduled on March 5. More information and details on this issue will be reported at March 11 JCC meeting. Ms. Kelli Burn-Roy, Camp Dresser& McKee, passed around the "Outstanding Project Study Award"from the Orange County Engineering Council honoring the GWR System Project received on February 23, 2002 at the Hyatt Regency in Anaheim. Director Anthony requested that the DS workshop's recommendations be brought back to the Committee. Ms. Bum-Roy said staff could provide the minutes of the -4 - Joint GWR System Cooperative Committee Minutes February 25,2002 DS workshop at the next meeting. Director Anthony also discussed the eventual termination of the separate the Groundwater Producer Advisory Committee (GPAC) group. REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGERS OCWD General Manager William R. Mills Jr. reported on the Bay Delta funding, and a 1,4-dioxane article on February 24 Orange County Register ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. The next Joint Cooperative Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, March 11 at 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District Administrative Offices, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. - 5 - -�' BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mee°ngDaW T 3Id 02r AGENDA REPORT Iremeumbe I4m 2 (q0(d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRE-SELECTION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Trojan Technologies as the ultraviolet light(UV)equipment manufacturer for the Groundwater Replenishment System based on lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost of $20.253,000, and a total capital cost of$9,749,405, plus tax; (2)Approve a Pre-Selection Agreement between Orange County Water District(OCWD)and Trojan Technologies to provide engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000 to be equally shared between OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD); (3)Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to the contract to install the demonstration UV system at a total cost of$849,842, plus tax; and (4) Grant authority to the Board of Directors of OCWD to assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV system at a total estimated capital cost of $8,649,563. plus tax. SUMMARY • In October 2001, the OCSD Board of Directors authorized issuance of a Request for Proposals for the pre-selection of ultraviolet light equipment estimated at$10,250.000,and granted authority to the OCWD Board of Directors to award a contract for equipment design in the amount of$250,000, also granted authority to the OCWD Board of Directors to assign the value of equipment to construction contracts for installation. • This Rem is being brought before the OCSD Board of Directors because the lowest proposed cost exceeded the engineers estimate. • The request for proposals was sent to four firths specializing in ultraviolet (UV) disinfection equipment and two proposals were received. Both were over the engineer's estimate of $10,250,000 when tax is included in the total cost. • Proposals were received from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies on February 27, 2002. • Trojan Technologies proposes the lowest capital cost of$10,439,990.61 with tax included at 7.75%and the lowest calculated present worth Trfe cycle cost of$20,253,000. • Approval is requested to award a $250,000 contract to Trojan Technologies for engineering design documents at this time. • The value of the UV disinfection equipment as proposed by Trojan Technologies will be assigned to the temporary facilities construction contractor and the permanent facilities Page 1 construction contractor is scheduled for bid and award in the Summer of 2002 and Spring of 2003. • These installation contracts will be brought before the Joint Cooperative Committee and the OCSD and OCWD Board of Directors in accordance with the adopted procedures in effect at that time. • The recommended action was approved by the Joint Cooperative Committee on March 11, 2002. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached budget information table. The value of the agreement awarded with this action is $250,000 to be equally shared with OCWD in the amount of$125,000. The authorization of funds was made in October 2001 for the engineering documents only in the amount of$125,000. There is no increase in the cost for engineering documents. Authorization of expenditures for the equipment will be requested with the award of the construction contracts in the future. Although the proposal by Trojan Technologies was over the engineer's estimate, a budget increase is not requested at this time. Funds are existing in contingency for the increase over the engineer's estimate, but adjustments will not be requested until the construction contracts are awarded. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2001-02 CIP Budget Sec.8,page 152) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the attached March 11, 2002 Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC)Agenda Item Submittal. ALTERNATIVES Alternatives to issuing a proposal for pre-selection of the equipment included pre-purchase of the equipment or preparing final designs for all equipment options. Pre-purchase of the equipment was not selected to reduce liability to the agencies and place liability for the equipment on the Contractor. With substantial differences in each equipment design, preparing final designs for each manufacturer was determined to be cost prohibitive. CEQA FINDINGS The Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Water District Boards of Directors certified the Environmental Impact Report for the Groundwater Replenishment System on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001, Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. •,„,,,,.,,,,, Page 2 4 ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. March 11, 2002 Joint Cooperative Committee Agenda Item Submittal re: Ultraviolet Light Equipment Pre-selection. JDH:jo:sa G:\wp.dta%agendM8wrd Agenda ReportsV002 Board Agenda RepcAe W02Utem 20tcl.GWRS.dm R°: fi�e Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS pROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORRED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZEDTO AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET DATE REDDEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development S 700.000 $ 4,000 8 4.000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 100% Studies/Permitin ' 4000,000 S 4,000000 S 4,OD0,000 S 4,OOD,000 $ 40110000 100% Consultant PSA' $ 7,500,ODO $ 18A00,000 S 18,400,000 S 18.158.334 S 18,158.334 $ 3.000,000 17% Design Staff S 2.349000 $ 1349.000 S 1,349,000 S 1,349.000 S 1,349.000 $ 2.500,000 185% Cons0uc0on ConlracP' E 86481,500 f 137500.000 S 137,500.000 f 9,642,655 $ 9.642,655 $ 0% Construction Administration— f 2,653,90O $ 6,021.000 $ 6.021.000 $ 5,496,519 $ 5,496,519 $ 0% Construction Inspection $ 9,345.600 S 326.000 f 326.000 E $ - E O% Contingency $ 12,895.000 S 15.100.000 $ 15.100.000 $ $ - $ 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 121.925,000 $ 182.700.000 $ - $ 182.700.000 $ 38.650,508 $ - S 38,650.508 $ 9,504,000 25% Reimbursable Costs $ $ 28,000.000 $ 28.000,000 11 1 1 $ 2,112.500 PROJECT NET S 121.925.000 1 S 154,70D.M S - S 154,700,000 1 S 38.650.508 $ S 35.650,508 1 $ 7.391.500 1 19% Funds authorized 10 date Includes multiple contracts Issued under the terms of The Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for the Groundwater Replenishment System with the Orange County Water District "Funds authoriaad to dale include Pipeline at Thep Lacy Jail.SCE substation construction,temporary office facilities,agreement and easements,production of MF/UV vendor design documents.and Owner Controlled Insurance Program. "'Funds authorized to dale include Construction Management Services awarded on February 27.2002 G'.twpubeengUOBS&CONTRACTSU-36\g-36 budget table 032702 Board.rlsIO&M&UV award OCSD Confidential O&M&UV award Page 1 Agenda Item #3 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: March 11, 2002 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 5014030-600.70-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: N/A From: William R. Mills Jr. General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Tom Dawes Subject: ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRESELECTION SUMMARY Two proposals were received on February 27, 2002 to provide ultraviolet light (UV) equipment for the Groundwater Replenishment System. Proposals were received from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies. Four firms including Wedeco-Ideal Horizons and Aquionics had been pre-qualified to provide the equipment. The proposal received from Trojan Technologies had the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost. The Trojan Technologies proposal also had the lowest capital cost of the UV equipment. The proposed capital cost of the UV equipment at $9,749,405 plus tax or $10,439,990.61 including tax at 7.75%, is above the engineer's estimate of $10,250,000 (without the 15% contingency added). Based on the results of the present worth life cycle cost analysis, the recommended pre-selected UV equipment manufacturer is Trojan Technologies. The Trojan bid provides significant ongoing operations and maintenance savings compared to our estimates. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for March 20 OCWD Board meeting and for March 27 OCSD Board meeting. A. Approve Addendums 1 and 2 providing a time extension and technical clarifications. B. Recommend that the Boards of Directors of OCWD and OCSD authorize OCWD to award a pre-selection agreement to Trojan Technologies for the manufacture of ultraviolet light equipment for the Groundwater Replenishment System for the total capital cost of$9,749,405 plus tax as follows: 1.) Authorize payment to Trojan Technologies for engineering details for the equipment design in the total amount of$250,000. 2.) Assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to a future contract to install the demonstration UV system at a total cost of$849,842, plus tax. - 1 - Agenda Item #3 e 3.) Assign the value of the ultraviolet light equipment to the contract to install the permanent UV system at a total estimated capital cost of$8,649,563, plus tax. BACKGROUND On October 8, 2001 your Committee approved the use of a present worth life cycle cost analysis as the basis for pre-selection of the UV equipment manufacturer. In September, the Board of Directors of the OCSD authorized the award of this contract if at or below the Engineers Estimate of$10,250,000. The criteria used for the determination of the lowest present worth fife-cycle cost included the capital cost of a demonstration UV system, capital cost of the permanent UV system, lamp replacement price, lamp life warranty period, and operational costs over a 25-year life. The operational costs included energy costs. An interest rate of 6% was used in the present worth calculation. The amount of energy necessary for operation of each manufacturer's system was to be guaranteed by the manufacturer in their proposal. A value of 6.5 cents per kWh was used for energy cost calculations. In addition, a payment of $250,000, MF system engineering costs, was included in the proposal determined by staff for all bidders. The demonstration UV system has a capacity of 5 mgd and will be installed near the time when the temporary MF system will be constructed. The demonstration UV system will be used to verify the performance of the UV manufacturers design for NDMA destruction and disinfection efficiency prior to delivery of the full UV system. The Department of Health Services (DHS) requires that installed UV systems show proof of disinfection efficiency prior to the system being put into full operation. Testing the demonstration system allows the design team to have confidence in the UV manufacturer's proposed design and meet DHS requirements. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS The engineer's estimate for the capital cost of the equipment including the demonstration UV system, permanent UV system, $250,000 lump sum for engineering services, and sales tax was $10,250,000. (The original estimate was based on sales tax at 7.5%, it was bid at 7.75%. Depending on State of California finances, the sales tax rate may change before the equipment is delivered and payment is made.) The basis of pre-selection is the lowest present worth life-cycle cost. This type of present worth analysis includes all capital as well as 0&M costs over the 25-year period chosen for the analysis. The Request for Proposal (RFP) and two addenda (attached) were sent to four pre- qualified UV equipment manufacturers. Two proposals were received on February 26, 2002, from Calgon Carbon Corporation and Trojan Technologies. The other two pre- qualified manufacturers, Wedeco-Ideal Horizons and Aquionics, did not submit a proposal for this project. The results of the proposals received were as follows: -2 - Agenda Item #3 Table 1 UV Equipment Pre-Selection Proposals Proposal Price Proposal Price Calculated MF Proposed for Capital Cost for Capital Cost Present Manufacturer Lamp type of Equipment* of Equipment' Worth Life (not including (including sales Cycle Cost sales tax) tax0 7.75/a Trojan Low pressure- $9,749,405 $10,439,990.61 $20,253,000 Technologies high intensity Calgon Medium $12,087,235.38 $12,958,650.07 $22,648,000 Carbon Corp. pressure Includes lump sum cost of$250,000 for special engineering services. The proposal received from Trojan Technologies had the lowest calculated present worth life cycle cost. The Trojan Technologies proposal also had the lowest capital cost of the UV equipment. The proposed capital cost of the UV equipment was above the engineer's estimate, $10,250,000, for both proposals (the Trojan proposal was below when tax is not included). Based on the results of the present worth life cycle cost analysis, the pre-selected UV equipment manufacturer should be Trojan Technologies. The UV equipment procurement will involve three separate contracts. The UV equipment procurement will include the following three contracts: 1. Demonstration and permanent UV system engineering (shop drawings/layout preparation/control system design) 2. Demonstration UV system (5 mgd) 3. Permanent UV system (70 mgd which includes the 5 mgd demonstration system) The first contract is between OCWD and Trojan Technologies as the UV equipment manufacturer. The amount of this contract will be limited to $250,000. This contract enables the treatment plant design team to prepare the work required to design the facilities necessary for the selected UV system. The contract for the demonstration UV system will be assigned to the general contractor chosen to install the demonstration UV system at a value of $849,842 plus tax. The contract for the permanent UV system will be assigned to the AWT general contractor at a value of $8,649,563, plus tax. Table 2 summarizes the breakdown of the Trojan Technologies contract. Table 2 Breakdown of Trojan Technologies UV Proposal Contract Proposal Price not including sales tax Engineering services $250,000 Demonstration UV system equipment $849,842 Permanent UV system equipment $8,649,563 TOTAL $9,749,405 - 3 - Agenda Item #3 I 1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE IMPLICATION The December 2000 project cost estimate of $352 million included estimated costs for the UV system power consumption and lamp replacement. The annual power estimate was $14/AF, but based on the Trojan proposal the actual cost would be $7.00/AF. This represents a project cost savings of $7.00/AF. Also, the annual lamp replacement cost estimate was $5.00/AF and the Trojan proposal provides a cost of $3.00/AF. This is a savings of$2.00/AF for a total savings of$9.00/AF. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS Discussed from time to time under the Project Development Phase, including July 30 and October 8, 2001. Attachments — RFP Addenda 1 and 2 -4 - ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FALL 1996 AND SUMMER 1997 WATER QUALITY DATA Prepared by: Science Applications International Corporation San Diego, CA and MEC Analytical Systems, Inc. Carlsbad, CA Prepared for: Orange County Sanitation District Fountain Valley, CA March 2002 CONTENTS — Page 1.0 BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVES,AND OVERVIEW 1 2.0 METHODS 7 2.1 Field Surveys 7 22 Laboratory Analysis 7 2.3 Data Analysis 8 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 9 3.1 1996 Surveys 9 3.2 1997 Surveys 14 3.3 Combined Results-1996 and 1997 18 4.0 REFERENCES 19 APPENDICES APPENDIX A SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS APPENDIX A.1 STABILITY CALCULATIONS FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. A.1.1 APPENDIX A.2 COLIFORM DATA FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. A.2.1 APPENDIX A.3 AMMONIUM DATA FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. A.3.1 APPENDIX AA TEMPERATURE-SALINITY PLOT DATA FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. A.4.1 APPENDIX A.5 TEMPERATURE AND SALINITY PLOTS BY DEPTH FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. A.5.1 APPENDIX B SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS APPENDIX BA STABILITY CALCULATIONS FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. B.1.1 APPENDIX B.2 COLIFORM DATA FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. B2.1 APPENDIX B.3 SALINITY DATA FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. B.3.1 APPENDIX 8.4 TEMPERATURE-SALINITY PLOT DATA FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. BA.1 APPENDIX B.5 TEMPERATURE AND SALINITY PLOTS BY DEPTH FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS. B.5.11 ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FALL 1996 AND SUMMER 1997 WATER QUALITY DATA r 1.0 BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVES,AND OVERVIEW This report evaluates water quality data collected by the Orange County Sanitation District (District), Fountain Valley, CA, over ten survey dates from September through November, 1996 and six survey dates in July and August 1997. Data include total and fecal coliforms (1996 and 1997) and ammonium (1996 only), representing indicators of the District's offshore wastewater discharge as well as other input sources (e.g., stormwater runoff) to the coastal environment; temperature and salinity used in determining water column stratification and stability; and supporting oceanographic and weather information. These two monitoring studies (1996 and 1997) provide important background information for ongoing, focused investigations (e.g., Huntington Beach Phase III Studies) whose objectives are to determine sources and processes that contribute to bacterial contamination along local beaches. Included in these overall investigations are data collections to test hypotheses on the potential influence of the intake and discharge system for the AES Power Plant, located within the District's study region. For the 1996 surveys, the study area included shelf (to 60-meter [m] depths) to nearshore (about 20-m depths) and surfzone stations (about ankle-deep water) offshore Newport Beach and Huntington Beach, CA (Figure 1-1). Principal goals 9" were to determine (1)whether ooliforn data showed spatial or temporal patterns and trends of contamination, particularly related to oceanographic and weather conditions (e.g., water column stratification, wind, waves, tides, and rainfall); and (2) whether collform concentrations within nearshore areas were compliant with water contact (Rec 1) standards defined by the Basin Plan (RWQCB 1995). Additionally, correlations of fecal coliform and ammonium data were used to establish whether a consistent relationship existed between these parameters, further aiding in evaluations of any patterns and trends. r For the 1997 surveys, the study area focused on 59 relatively shallow nearshore stations at 5m, 10m, 15m, and 20m depths, and 9 surfzone stations offshore Long Beach, Seal Beach, Sunset Beach, and Huntington Beach, CA (Figure 1-2). r Principal goals were to evaluate nearshore occurrences of coliforns and the influence of oceanographic and weather conditions within a depth zone that had received relatively little study (e.g., shallower than the 20-m isobath) under .. prevailing permit requirements. A focus was on the source of low salinity water that has been observed during numerous surveys, particularly in the more northerly sampling region (e.g., 27N to 45N and further). These data were collected to help test the hypothesis that the low salinity water was from sources north of the District's outfall region, (e.g., San Gabriel River and/or Los Angeles River (Long Beach Harbor Complex), also potentially representing an additional source of bacteria to the District's study area. r � r \ r10m f' 20m \ 2 � 0 \ \'. Hunting( Pn eacl \ \ t \ \ t p •79N20 e N \ \ ze e c Ib \ \ y \ \ u1 o \ nit as \ 41N-20 � .. 0 15 \ Ne ch e0m \ •JN.20 \ N \ ,.....4S �..44n 0 \ ��, 0 \\ � Coro De Mar \ \ 48 .20 21 N ' ts B sw(aBt111B1 C /IYO Cen m \ loc. 0 120m 200m \ mom Figure 1-1. Sampling Stations for the District's 1996 20-Meter Water quality Study. oans•cwniv s•nn•i D.,I..CAI.— 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 i 1 1 I I 1 1 1 t Ig tract • o- Be Shore • 69ING 4019 •Seal Beach 6M1-15 iNl•15 Ul�.tf' till-2f IK t611-2Y. QINS SIIM)Y mlington Harbour 03-11241 571t1S Beach sill Fountain Va y 20m R1�20 "'5111-05 4511 5 11 d51}1t '. b 5111-20 .10 O 'J$1415 10- ]II .JN421 .3f11-ts 'A -5 . f -0f. 2711 - _ `.2 10 ttll Hunt ngton Bi ach ' •H ` 2711d5 .2 5 • m 111E � 1511 c o t z W2J'. miles 2111-1s yNl 0 1 3 3 11 kilometers 111E Is Is �f 61E 3 1N�1f 911-0s --. 311- 40m 611- M42D.- 611.2 311-20-- Figure 1-2. Sampling Stations for the District's 1997 Low Salinity/Bacteriological Water Duality Study. Orange County Sanitation Dist-I Coots— V L Intercomparison of the 1996 and 1997 data also help to understand the influence , of oceanographic conditions on broad-scale patterns and trends in coliforms and t.J sources. Overall results as detailed below indicate the following: L 1996 Surveys - u • Water column stratification was evident during each survey, based on calculations of pycnocline depths and stability (Sigma-t). Consistent with - these results, the wastewater plume was predominantly restricted to mid- LJ or near-bottom depths. • Temperature-Salinity (T-S) plots indicated the presence of lower salinity L water near the bottom to mid-depth at some stations and near the District's outfall, during most surveys. Low salinity water also occurred I-' near the surface during three of four surveys in November, and to a much L lesser extent during one survey each in September and October. Lower salinity near the bottom to mid-depth corresponded to locations of elevated fecal coliforms, thereby indicating an association with the wastewater discharge. Lower surface water salinity was associated with rainfall runoff during the November 25 survey and unknown processes on November 20. Although the pattern looks similar to November 25, no L rainfall occurred during the several day period prior to this survey and there were no releases from Prado Dam down the Santa Ana River between November 15-24 (USGS, unpublished data). Intermittent occurrences were seen at a few stations (e.g., 39N-20 and 37A) and surveys. There was no evidence for movement into the study area of lower salinity water (e.g., from upcoast areas), and all offshore associations of low salinity and conforms appeared to be locally derived W (i.e., from the outfall). This is in contrast to the 1997 data (see summary below) that indicated several associations of low-salinity water near the L surface and elevated coliforms that originated from an upcoast source(s). • Three of 10 surveys (October 23 and 28, and November 20) showed simultaneous evidence of nearshore (20 m) and surfzone contamination L by coliforms, with 1 additional survey (November 25) influenced by rainfall runoff. The other surveys were characterized by no contamination in either region (e.g., October 10), or by contamination in one region but not L the other (e.g., September 30 and November 5). The highest concentration of fecal coliforms (MPN of >16,000) occurred at 9-m depth (Station 0-20). about 1.5 miles from shore on one survey date (October L 23). I u l 4 aw L • Fecal coliforms and ammonium were strongly correlated (e.g., correlation coefficient of 0.70-0.92)during 7 of 10 surveys. The other 3 surveys were •+ influenced (biased) by large numbers of values that were below detection, and therefore were not significantly correlated. However, fecal coliforms appeared to show more consistent patterns, based on the much higher concentrations in the final effluent. • Surf, wind, and tide conditions were not consistently related to patterns of contamination, although each of the survey dates characterized by nearshore and surfzone contamination occurred near or during periods of a full moon (strongest tidal influence) and winds had an intermittent easterly component. • The AES Power Plant was operating for at least several days prior to and during each survey, although the volume of intake/discharge was about one order of magnitude less during the four November surveys (21 versus 127 or 253 million gallons per day[MGD] during the other months). In general, the results were equivocal, indicating no consistent relationship of contaminant patterns and trends for coliforms over the range of sampling depths (approximately 20-60 m) and survey dates. Results showed that the wastewater plume (e.g., suggested by fecal coliform concentrations above an MPN of 100/100mL) extended to at least some 20-m stations on 5 of 10 survey dates (September 30 at one station below the pycnocline; October 23 at three stations below the pycnocline or at mid-depth; October 28 and November 20 at five and four stations, respectively, below the pycnocline or at mid-depth; and November 25 at two stations below the pycnocline or at mid-depth). All Rec 1 Standards were met by these data. The 1997 results (see summary below) suggested that many of the elevated coliforms in nearshore waters (e.g., 10-20 m isobath stations) originated north of the District's permit-specified sampling stations (i.e., ' they did not appear to originate from the ouffall) on at least 4 of 6 survey days, and were not obviously related to the offshore discharge on any of those six days. 1997 Surveys • Water column stratification was evident during each survey, based on calculations of pycnocline depths and stability (Sigma4), but was less evident at the 5- and 10-m stations, likely due to greater natural mixing at these shallower depths. Consistent with these results, the wastewater plume was predominantly restricted to mid- or near-bottom depths. • Temperature-Salinity (T-S) plots indicated the presence of lower salinity water at surface to sometimes mid-depths, predominantly at the most northerly stations, with a decreasing gradient (salinity closer to normal) to the south. This suggests movement into the study area of lower salinity 5 W W water (e.g., from upcoast areas), potentially from the San Gabriel River _ and/or Los Angeles River/Long Beach Harbor Complex. It is notable that elevated coliforms were generally associated with this low salinity water, .W likely indicating an additional source of colifonn contamination to the study region, although correlations between feral colifonns and salinity were - only significant (negatively)for two of six surveys (July 22 and 29). • Coliform data indicated three main patterns: elevated values at northern offshore stations, decreasing with depth and to the south during five of six W surveys; elevated values in the surfzone and/or mostly 5- to 10-m stations in the southern part of the study area (e.g., vicinity of Stations 3N-15N)on - five days; and elevated values, predominantly near the bottom to mid- depth at stations near the outfall, related to the wastewater plume. There were no obvious patterns linking plume-related increases at the 20-m - stations (i.e., those that are farthest offshore for this study) with elevated values in the surfzone or 5- and 10-m stations. The highest concentration of total colifonns (MPN of 2005) occurred at three stations: surfzone - Station 9N and northern offshore Station 45N-10 (surface value) on July 22, and northern offshore Station 45N-15 (surface value) on August 5. The northern station results were influenced by movement of waters into the study region from the north (as noted above). The source of the d. surfzone results is presently unknown, representing a continuing focus of additional data collections throughout the region by the District and other — researchers. w • Surf, wind, and tide conditions were generally mild during each survey, With surf of less than one foot, from west, north, or southerly directions, and similarly light winds (1-9 knots) from westerly through southerly or W southeasterly directions, with no obvious relationship to patterns of — coliform incidence. Four of six surveys (July 8, 22, and 29, and August 5) occurred near a full or new moon (strongest tidal influence), with lesser tidal influence on July 15 and August 12. Notwithstanding, there was no - consistent pattern that was evident from these data and the coliform patterns. • The AES Power Plant was operating for at least several days prior to and during each survey, ranging from 127 to 253 MGD. In general, the results suggested that lower salinity water is being transported into the study region from a northerly source (e.g., the Los Angeles River/Long Beach Harbor Complex and/or the San Gabriel River), and that this water is sometimes associated with elevated coliform bacteria. There was no evidence of colifonn contamination that moved from the vicinity of the downcoast 20-m W stations (i.e., representing the stations closest to the outfall and the wastewater _ plume) into shallower areas such as the surfzone. W e W r 2.0 METHODS 2.1 Field Surveys Field surveys were conducted at five shallow offshore stations at about 20-meter (m) depths and six deeper stations (about 24-60 m) on ten days from September to November 1996 and during six days from July to August 1997 (Figures 1-1 and 1-2). Established methods were used for water quality and surfzone sampling, as detailed in OCSD (1997 and 1998). Offshore measurements were performed using an automated profiling system (Seabird CTD) to collect data on water temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, and water clarity (measured as light transmissivity) at 1-m intervals from 1 m below the surface to within 2 m of the bottom. Offshore water samples for analysis of fecal coliforms (1996 and 1997), total coliforms (1997 only), and ammonium (1996 only) were collected at r three depths, surface (1 m below), half the water column depth, and bottom (2 m above). For this focused evaluation, only temperature, salinity, coliform, and ammonium data are used since they represent the most direct Indicators of water column stratification (based on temperature and salinity) and the wastewater plume. During 1996, surfzone water samples for analysis of total coliforms were collected on 9 of 10 survey dates (all but October 10), and samples for fecal coliform analysis were collected at more than half of the stations on three days (October 10, 23, and 28), less than half on one day (September 26), and all stations on one day (November 5). In 1997, surfzone samples for total coliform analysis were collected on all survey dates. Data on weather (wind speed and direction) and oceanographic conditions (wave height and direction) were summarized from records of the Orange County Sheriffs Harbor Patrol Office (Newport Beach). Rain data were obtained from the Orange County Public Facilities & Resources Department. A lunar index, representing a general surrogate for tidal influence, was determined for each survey day using data from the U.S. Naval Observatory website r (httr)://mach.usno.navy.mil/cai-bin/aa moonill.ol). Specifically, the index ranges from 0-1, with 0 and 1 representing the new and full moon phases (greatest tidal influence), respectively, and 0.5 representing first and third quarter phases �+ (weakest tidal influence). Days before or after these phases represent a gradient of stronger or weaker tidal Influence, associated with the fraction of the moon illuminated on a particular day. 2.2 Laboratory .. Fecal coliform densities were determined using Method 9221C.2 found in "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", APHA, 191" edition, 1995 (Standard Methods). Beginning in 1998, and prior to 1998 for some r r 7 r L L special projects, offshore water quality samples were analyzed using methods described in Section 9223 in Standard Methods. V Method 9221 C.2 is a standard multiple tube fermentation procedure that uses a lactose medium and an incubation temperature of 44.5 t 0.2 °C to detect and enumerate the fecal coliform population in a sample. Section 9223 describes y sophisticated methods, which use chromogen-labeled substrates to detect and enumerate both total coliform and E. coli populations In a sample. Chromogenic substrate technology makes advantage of an organism's ability to produce enzymes that break down components in the medium. The chromogenic substrate technology used by the District defines total coliform as all bacteria that produce the enzyme p-D-galactosidase, the enzyme necessary to break down `,I ortho-nitrophenyl-p-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG). By labeling the ONPG with a yellow chromogen if the medium turns yellow the presence of coliform bacteria is indicated. V Escherichia coll(E. coli), the largest and probably most important member of the j fecal coliform population, is the only bacterium that has been shown to produce L the enzyme p-glucuronidase. p-glucuronidase production can then be exploited in the chromogenic methods to determine the presence of E. coli, specifically by labeling the substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-p-D-glucuronide (MUG) with a fluorescent chromogen. E. coil can then be detected if the medium fluoresces under ultraviolet light. - A series of samples of final effluent from the District's Plant#2 were concurrently L analyzed for fecal coliform and E. coli using the methods described. In the case of final effluent, the populations of fecal coliform and E. colf are nearly identical or 1:1. However, it was decided that because the ratio of these populations may not be 1:1, as a result of aging of the discharge in marine waters, the District — measures E. coli In the current offshore water quality program but reports a L calculated fecal number that is corrected by a factor of 1.1. 2.3 Data Analysts L Data analysis consisted of data summaries, statistical analysis, and data plotting to evaluate patterns and trends. Data summaries included calculation of water L column stratification (based on pycnocline depths by station and survey) and stability (based on increasing sigma-T with depth; sigma-T was calculated from _ temperature and salinity [Knudsen 1901]); and mean, maximum, and minimum values for temperature (T), and salinity (S). Pearson's Correlation analysis was L performed on paired fecal coliform and ammonium data from the 1996 offshore stations and for fecal coliform and salinity data from both years to determine the I , relationship and any trends between these parameters. Data below the method L• detection limit (e.g., less than an MPN of 10/100 mL for ooliforns) were not included in these analyses. For 1996, data plots by survey consisted of two- V dimensional (2-D) figures showing patterns in offshore fecal coliform data and 8 V IJ ammonium data, and surfzone total and fecal coliforn data for most surveys. For 1997, no ammonium data were collected, but 2-D plots are presented for fecal and total celiform data at offshore and surfzone stations. Additionally, T-S plots were prepared for both years to evaluate patterns and trends in these data, in particular any co-occurrence of low salinity water and elevated fecal coliforms .. that might suggest an intrusion of contaminated water from outside of the study region or other sources. Two-dimensional plots were produced using CorelDraw software. Three-dimensional plots were generated using ]GODS computer software. 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Results for the 1996 and 1997 are presented in Sections 3.1 and 3.2, with a summary of the combined results in Section 3.3. 3.1 1996 Surveys Principal goals were to determine (1) whether celiform data showed spatial or temporal patterns and trends of contamination, particularly related to oceanographic and weather conditions (e.g., water column stratification, wind, waves, fides, and rainfall); and (2)whether any occurrences of elevated colifonn concentrations within nearshore areas was consistent with water contact (Rec 1) standards defined by the Basin Plan. Additionally, correlations of fecal coliform and ammonium data were used to establish whether a consistent relationship existed between these parameters, further aiding in evaluations of any patterns and trends. Detailed results for several analyses are presented in Appendix A and summarized in Table 3-1. As indicated in the table and discussed below, many of the parameters were relatively consistent over all or most of the survey days, or were variable but did not have any obvious relationship to patterns and trends in the coliform data. Water Column Stratification and Stability The water column was stratified (based on calculations of pycnocline depths and stability) during each of the surveys (Appendix A.1). Results of water quality surveys conducted by the District since 1965 indicate that the offshore �- wastewater plume is predominantly restricted below the pycnocline (e.g., typically 10.40 m) under these conditions, normally from late Spring through Fall (e.g., OCSD 1997 and 2001). 9 Table 3-1. Summary of OCSD Water Quality Surveys at Surfzone and 20-to 60-m Offshore Stations, September-November 1996. Orange County 6annallon District,Calgomla. Total Coliforma AES' Fetal Coliforma at REC 1 , , Tidal' Survey ations( IP 20-m Statlon(s) Standards Wintl mph Surf ft Flow fluenRained) Stations(MPN) (MPN) Met (Direction) (Direction) Volume Influence (Inches) (MOD) 9126196 High 9N(230) Below detection Yes 11.17 4-6 127 1.0 No SW S 9130/96 Low(<2040) Below detection, Yes 7-16 1-3 253 0.84 No except 0-20 at (westerly) (southerly) bottom 700 10/10/96 No totals data; Low(20 max) Yes 5-9 1-3 127 0.03 No fecals low 2040 (westerly) S 10/14/96 Low(<20-20) Below detection Yes 3-10 14 127 0.08 No south-westert S-W 1023M Low(<20-20), High below surface Yes 7-25 1-3 127 0.91 No except 6N(170) 0-20 to 21N-20 (NE-SE+SW) (W-S) 230-18 000+ 1028/96 High 3S-9N(80- High all stations Yes 6-23 1.4 127 0.94 No 300); low further bottom to mlddepth (SW-NE) (W) north <20-20 80.1700 11/5/98 High 0-39N Low(<2040) Yes 2.10 2-6 21 0.27 No 80-1,300 SE, NE, SW SWS 11/13/90 3S-39N Low(<2040) Yes 0-5 14 21 0.09 No 2D-e00) (S-SW) (sw-s 1120/98 High 9S-3N High most stations Yes 0-10 14 21 0.80 No (80-270) bottom to mid-depth (SW,W, E,NE) (SW,S,W) 90-5 000- 1125/98- 8S•39N Low(<2040), Yes .S 1-4 21 0.99 1.58 on (130-5.000) except botiomto (NW-SW) (W) 1122M mid-depth 914-20& 21N-20 8D-170 ' Range from a few days prior to during the survey. 2 Based on scale from 0 to 1 (U.S. Naval Observatory),with 0 and 1 corresponding to new and full moon phases(strongest tidal Influence),respectively,and 0.5 denoting first and last quarter moons(weakest tidal Influence). 'Rain Influenced. ••Trends in data. E E E C C_ : E- [ E ; F E V ' E E E E - [ E E- E Total and Fecal Collforms Coliform data for the ten survey days at the 20-m and surfzone stations are summarized in Table 3-1 and detailed in Appendix A.2 (2-D plots). In general, all combinations of coliform results were evident from the 20-m and surfzone stations: elevated in both areas (October 23 and 28, and November 20 and 25, with the latter influenced strongly by rainfall runoff), not elevated at either (e.g., October 10), or elevated at one or the other (e.g.. September 30 and November 5). These results provide a full range of effects (i.e., colgorm) data for comparison with process-oriented parameters such as weather, physical oceanographic, and AES operating conditions to evaluate potential cause and effect relationships. Offshore fecal coliform data followed typical patterns observed from the District's water quality surveys since 1985 (e.g., OCSD 2001). Detectable fecal colifonms (i.e., data above the MPN detection limit of 20/100 mQ were restricted to mid- to near-bottom depths, with the exception of one low value each near the surface at Station 9S-20 on October 28 (MPN of 80/100 mQ and November 20 (MPN of 40/100 mQ. The source of these near surface values appears to be the wastewater discharge, based on the progressively higher concentrations at deeper depths, but the predominant trend of the offshore coliform data showed characteristic bounding by the pycnocline below mid- or near bottom depths. Maximum MPN values at mid-to near-bottom depths exceeded several thousand during nine of ten surveys (all except September 26, which had a maximum of 230/100 mQ, but most of these were near the bottom and limited to stations near the outfall, most commonly Stations 0, 28A, 14A, and 0-20, and less frequently at Stations X and 9N-20. The general pattern of the offshore data shows the wastewater discharge extended mostly upcoast from the diffuser (Station 0) and to the 20-m contour (Station 0-20), with decreasing effects north of Stations X and 9N-20(Appendix A.2). Surfzone total coliform data were characterized by generally low values (mostly below detection to a maximum of 230/100mL) during the first five surveys, with increasing values (e.g., 300-5,000/100 mQ at a few to numerous stations during the last five (October 28 and later). Elevated surfzone values extended over the full geographic range of stations, with the most consistent pattern represented by higher values near or just south or north of the Santa Ana River (e.g., October 28, and November 13, 20, and 25). Surfzone stations such as 9N and 6N were commonly lower than adjacent stations. This is in contrast to higher incidences of contamination at these two stations during Summer of 1999 and to a lesser extent in 2000 and 2001 (S. Grant, pers. comm., 2001), and may suggest that different processes and/or sources of coliforms were predominating during 1996. Analysis of long-term surfzone data shows an increase in dry weather contamination near 9N and 6N from about 1998 to present (Boehm et al., in .. review). tt W W Fecal coliform and ammonium data were strongly correlated (e.g., 0.70-0.92) during 7 of 10 surveys, with the 3 others influenced (biased) by large numbers of values that were below detection (Table 3-2). However, fecal coliforms appeared to show more consistent patterns, based on the much higher concentrations in the final effluent(OCSD 1997). Table 3.2. Correlation Analysis(Pearson)of Fecal Collforms and Ammonium by W Survey,Fall 1996. Values below detection are not included. Orange County Sanit fim Oiskid,Cafifomm Survey Correlation Coefficient SI nificant 50.05 - 9/26 -0.69' No 9/30 0.89 Yes 10/10 0.87 Yes 10/14 N/A' N/A 10/23 0.74 Yes 10/28 0.70 Yes - 11/5 0.92 Yes 11/13 0.82 Yes 11/20 0.77 Yes 11/25 -0.04' No W 'Majority of values below detection for one or both parameters. W Ammonium Ammonium data were generally low during most surveys, predominantly below detection (<0.01 mg/L), ranging upwards to 0.11, 0.14, and 0.15 mg/L on November 5, November 20, and October 23, respectively (Appendix A.3). The average over all the surveys was 0.01 mg/L. These data showed similar trends to the fecal coliform results, as noted above by the strong correlations for most surveys, and provided similar indications of the wastewater plume for 7 of 10 survey dates. The exceptions were September 30, October 10, and October 14 when a plume signal near the outfall was more evident from the ammonium than the coliform data (9/30 and 10/10) and at some 20-m stations (9/30 and 10114). In general, however, the coliform data showed more distinct patterns, likely due W to the much higher concentrations in the final effluent (e.g., OCSD 2001). Temperature-Salinity Temperature-Salinity (T-S) plots indicated the presence of lower salinity water near the bottom to mid-depth at some stations near the District's outfall during most surveys, near or at the surface during three of four surveys in November, W 12 W and to a much lesser extent on September 26 and October 10 (Appendices AA and A.5). Lower salinity near the bottom to mid-depth corresponded with locations of elevated fecal coliforms (Appendix A.2), representing typical indicators (OCSD 2001)of the wastewater discharge plume (lower salinity due to the discharge of essentially fresh water). Lower surface salinity was associated with runoff from rainfall occurring a few days prior to the November 25 survey, unknown processes on November 20 (no rainfall occurred during the several day period prior to the survey, although the pattern looks similar to November 25), and patchy occurrences at a few stations (e.g., 39N-20 and 37A) and surveys. There was no evidence for movement into — the study area of lower salinity water (e.g., from upcoast areas) (Appendix A.2), in contrast to results from 1997 (Section 3.2). All offshore associations of low salinity and colifonns appeared to be locally derived (i.e., from the outfall). Rainfall No rainfall occurred for several days prior to or during the surveys for the first nine survey days (Table 3-1). Substantial rainfall (1.58 inches) occurred three days prior to the November 25 survey, and was the only day characterized by broad-scale contamination from surfzone Stations 9S to 39N due to total coliforms. Waves and Wind Wave conditions were generally small to moderate (e.g., 1-4 and maximally to 6 feet) from southerly to westerly directions over the range of surveys (Table 3-1), and did not exhibit any obvious patterns related to total colifonms measured in the surfzone. Winds were considerably more variable (e.g., 0-20 mph) from a variety of directions (e.g., westerly, southwesterly, and some northeast and southeast components) depending on the survey day (Table 3-1). There were no consistent patterns related to wind and total col'rforms in the surfzone, however, easterly wind components (e.g., southeast to northeast)were evident on three of the four days (October 23 and 28, and November 20) when elevated colifonns were present at both the offshore 20-m and surfzone stations. In contrast, easterly wind components also occurred on November 5 during a period when elevated colifonms were measured in the surfzone, but not at the 20-m stations (Table 3-1). Analysis of additional wind and coliform data from other survey periods is necessary to determine whether the easterly trend represents a distinct process-oriented relationship, or a more random pattern from this small data set. 13 L V AES Power Plant The AES Power Plant was operating during each survey period, although at a minimum level (21 MGD) during the four surveys in November (Table 3-1). All combinations of colfforn results were evident from the 20-m and surfzone stations: elevated in both areas, not elevated at either, or elevated at one or the other. These data suggest no obvious patterns related to the power plant (i.e., _ the results are equivocal). u Tidal Influence Tidal influence (based on a lunar phase index) was relatively strong (i.e., near or !� at and index value of 0 or 1) during all but three surveys (September 30, and November 5 and 20), and likewise spanned the full range of coliforn results at the 20-m and surfzone stations, as noted for the power plant (Table 3-1). This r generalized view of tidal influence suggests no obvious patterns related to elevated coliforms, although each of the three survey dates characterized by nearshore and surfzone contamination occurred near or during periods of a full it moon (strongest tidal influence). Analysis of longer-term data sets may result in additional conclusions, such as a correlation with spring tides (S. Grant, UCI, pers. comm., 2001). In summary, most parameters (weather, physical oceanographic, and AES operating conditions) showed no consistent association with patterns and trends in elevated coliforms that might suggest a process-oriented relationship. There may be some association with higher tidal influence and/or winds having an easterly component (noted for all three days when both the 20-m and surfzone stations had elevated values), but these possibilities cannot be verified based on the 1996 data alone, and would need to be addressed using data from other study years. In general, the results are similar to conclusions from water quality W surveys since 1985, indicating restriction of the offshore wastewater plume below mid- to near-bottom depths and no obvious evidence for a connection with surfzone contamination. The data also indicate a local (i.e., wastewater discharge) source of offshore elevated coliforms below the pycnocline, as W opposed to encroachment of contaminated water from an upcoast source(s). 3.2 1997 Surveys u Principal goals were to evaluate nearshore occurrences of coliforms and the influence of oceanographic and weather conditions within a depth zone that has W received relatively little study under present permit requirements. A focus was on the source of low salinity water that has been observed during numerous surveys, particularly in the more northerly sampling region. These data were !� collected to help test the hypothesis that the low salinity water was from the San Gabriel River, also potentially representing an additional source of coliform bacteria to the District's study area. r W 14 u Detailed results for several analyses are presented in Appendix B, as summarized in Table 3-3. As indicated in the table and discussed below, many of the parameters were relatively consistent over all or most of the survey days, or were variable but did not have any obvious relationship to patterns and trends in the coliform data. Water Column Stratification and Stability The water column was stratified (based on calculations of pycnocline depths and stability) during each of the surveys (Appendix B.1). Results of water quality surveys by the District since 1985 indicate that the offshore wastewater plume predominantly is restricted below the pycnocline from late Spring through Fall (e.g., OCSD 1997 and 2001). Total and Fecal Coliforms Coliform data for the six survey days are summarized in Table 3-3 and detailed in Appendix B.2 (2-D and 3-D plots). Key patterns indicate (1)elevated values near or at the surface for many offshore stations in the northern part of study area (e.g., 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-m depths for Stations 33N-45N), decreasing with depth and to the south during five of six surveys (all but 7/15); (2)elevated values in the surfzone and/or mostly 5-to 10-m stations in the southern part of the study area (e.g., vicinity of Stations 3N-15N) on five days (7/8, 7/15, 7/22, 7/29, and 8/12); and (3) elevated values, predominantly near the bottom to mid-depth at stations downcoast and inshore from the outfall diffuser, related to the wastewater plume. There were no obvious patterns linking plume-related increases at the 20-m stations (i.e., those that are farthest offshore for this study) with elevated values in the surfzone or 5- and 10-m stations. Additional studies of processes, transport mechanisms, and sources of colifonns in the nearshore region (e.g., from 20-m depths to shore) are part of comprehensive data collections being conducted by the District and other researchers in 2000 and 2001. It is notable that the elevated ooliform values at the northern stations, as summarized in (1) above, are strongly associated with lower salinity waters originating to the north of the study area, although correlations between fecal coliforms and salinity were only significant (negatively) for two of six surveys (July 22 and 29; Table 3-4). This lower salinity signal is apparently due to freshwater runoff, likely from a source such as the San Gabriel River and/or Los Angeles River /Long Beach Harbor Complex (Figure 1-2). and is evident in 3-D plots of the study region (Appendix B.3). This relationship is addressed further in the temperature-salinity discussion below, and demonstrates another source of col'rforms to the study region. 15 Table 3-3. Summary of OCSD Water Quality Surveys, July-August 1997. Orange County Sanitation Dlstrkt,Calllomla. t Survey Total Coliforms Summary(MPN)•• Wind' mph surf'It AES Flow Tidal' Rainfall (Direction) (Direction) Volume Influence (Inches) 718197 Highest values(to 207)offshore 15N-3N at 5 m 5-7 <1-calm 253 0.15 No depths;misc low(mostly 10)up to offshore 39N at (southerly) (southerly) 5-to 10-m Isobath and further offshore near outfall;no surfzone data. 7115197 Common high(e.g.,—100400)near surface 4-9 <i-calm 253 0.78 No offshore 45N-33N,decreasing with depth and (S-SW) (westerly) distance to south:high(300&500)at 9N&6N, decreasing(to 10)offshore to 15-m Isobath,and slight Increase 10-53 at 20-m Isobath. 722197 High (-800-2000)offshore 45N,decreasing with 3-8 <1 127 D.90 No depth;high(-2000& 1000)at 9N and 3N,much (westerly) (northerly) lower(42-238)at other surfzone stations to 39N, decreasing(0-64)offshore to 20-m isobath; °i except higher(to 1184)below surface and at to near the surface(272 &300)at 15 m&20 m Isobath offshore 3N. 729/97 High(-100-350)offshore 39N&49 N,decreasing 3 <1 127 0.19 No with depth and distance to south; high(75-124) (south- (westerly) surfzone at 3N-15N,but low(e.g.,0-10)oolifonns westerly) onshore 3N-15N. 8/5/97 High(-100-2000)onshore 33N45N, decreasing 5 Not 253 0.06 No with depth and distance to south; low(mostly 0- (south- Recorded 20)onshore of 3N-21N;no surfzone data. westerly) 8/12197 High(42-111)offshore 27N-45N,decreasing with 1-6 <1 127 0.63 No depth and distance to south;high(42-344) (SE-W) (W) surfzone 6N45N and 10-m station off 3N(453); low(0-31)at most stations offshore 3N-21N and seaward of 10-m isobath. ' Range during the survey. 2 Based on scale from 0 to 1 (U.S.Naval Observatory),with 0 and 1 corresponding to new and full moon phases (strongest tidal Influence), respectively,and 0.5 denoting first and last quarter moons(weakest tidal Influence). "Trends In data;fecal coliforms showed comparable, but less definitive patterns. V_ _ E [-_ , f E_ ' [ U_ IF F E E E_ L T _ 1 _ 11 _ C E- Table 3.4. Correlation Analysis (Pearson) of Fecal Colifomis and Salinity by Survey, Summer 1997. Values below detection are not included. — Orange County Sanitation Dl d,Ca5romia Survey correlation Coefficient significant 50.05 7/8 N/A* N/A 7/15 -0.29 No 7/22 -0.66 Yes 7/29 -0.83 Yes 8/5 -0.05 No 8/12 -0.11 No *Majority of values below detection for fecal coliforns. Temperature-Salinity Temperature-Salinity (T-S) plots indicated that all six survey days were characterized by lower salinity water(e.g., a range of about 0.1-1 A psu [practical salinity unit] lower than ambient values of 33.4-33.6 psu), predominantly at the more northerly stations, such as offshore 57N-69N (Appendices BA and B.5). Downcoast from these stations (e.g., offshore 33N-45N), near surface salinity values exhibited a smaller range of low salinity, suggesting a decreasing gradient from north to south. Consistent with this trend, Stations 3N-21N had surface salinities that were largely within ambient ranges. Another notable trend was higher salinities near the surface on two days (7/29 and to a lesser extent 8/12). These higher values were mostly offshore Stations 3N-6N (Appendix BA), and may indicate outflow from a source such as Talbert Marsh (adjacent to the Santa Ana River mouth), where evaporation could result in higher than ambient salinity. Rainfall No rainfall occurred for several days prior to or during the six surveys (Table 3-3). Therefore, incidences of elevated coliforms in the surfzone or nearshore region on some days (see above) are unrelated to rainfall runoff, but does not exclude dry-weather outflows from sources such as the Santa Ana River or Talbert Marsh. Waves and Wind Wave conditions were very calm during the surveys (e.g., less than 1 foot) from southerly through northerly directions (Table 3-3). Winds were similarly light, generally ranging from 3 to 7-9 miles per hour from mostly southerly to southwest and westerly directions (Table 3-3). These calm conditions are generally 17 Li L expected during morning hours in the study area when the sample collections occurred. There were no obvious patterns or influences of these conditions on the trends in colifonn or other data noted above for the surveys. AES Power Plant w The AES Power Plant was operating during each survey period, at flow volumes of about 127 or 253 MGD (Table 3-3). These data suggest no obvious patterns related to the cofrfonn or other data from the surveys. W Tidal Influence W Tidal influence (based on a lunar phase index)was relatively strong (i.e., near or at and index value of 0 or 1) during all but two of the six surveys (July 15 and August 12; Table 3-3). Similar to the 1996 results, this generalized view of tidal influence suggests no obvious patterns related to elevated coliforms or the other survey data. Analysis of longer-term data sets may result in additional conclusions, such as a correlation with spring tides (Boehm et al., in review; S. Grant, UCI, pers. comm., 2001). In summary, most parameters (weather, physical oceanographic, and AES W operating conditions) showed no consistent association with patterns and trends in elevated coliforms that might suggest a process-oriented relationship. The most notable observation from the 1997 surveys is the occurrence of low salinity u waters associated with elevated colifonn concentrations, mostly in the northern offshore region of the study area. The source of these waters may be the San Gabriel River or other freshwater outflow source to the north, and indicates another source of coliforms to the study region. In general, the results are similar to conclusions from water quality surveys since 1985, indicating restriction of the offshore wastewater plume below mid- to near-bottom depths and no obvious evidence for a connection with surfzone contamination. 3.3 Combined Results-1996 and 1997 W In general for both the 1996 and 1997 studies, incidences of elevated coliforms in offshore to nearshore and surfzone locations were not related to patterns and trends in weather, physical oceanographic, and AES power plant operating W conditions. Exceptions may be indicated by three days in 1996 when both the 20-m and surfzone stations had elevated values and there was a relatively higher tidal influence and/or winds having an easterly component. Offshore patterns of W elevated coliform concentrations were predominantly restricted to mid- to near- bottom depths, and were related to discharges in the wastewater plume. There was no evidence of a connection for offshore coliforms with surfzone v contamination. Patterns of lower salinity water near the surface were seen extending from the northern part of the study area, potentially indicating outflow from the San Gabriel River or other sources such as the Los Angeles River/Long iu I 18 W Beach Harbor Complex during 1997, but this pattern was not seen in 1996. This lower salinity water was associated with somewhat elevated colifonn concentrations, suggesting a combined source such as river outflow. These colifonn values are unlikely to represent a principal source of elevated concentrations to the surfzone in the District's study region, particularly since — they are generally lower than the highest surfzone values, but do indicate another source of contamination to the study region. Reasons for the differences between 1996 and 1997 are presently unknown, but may reflect variability in river outflows and associated contaminant sources or an artifact of sampling design differences between the years. 4.0 REFERENCES Boehm, A.B., J.H. Kim, S.L. Mowbray, C.D. McGee, C.D. Clark, D.M. Foley, D.E. Wellman and S.B. Grant. In Review. Variability of Surf Zone Water Quality at Huntington Beach, California. Submitted to Science, December, 2001. Brigham Young University (BYU). 1994. GMS — Groundwater Modeling System Software. Brigham Young University Engineering Computer Graphics Laboratory. Knudsen, M. 1901. Hydrographical Tables, Reprint 1962, WHOI and Comm. Internat pour L'Explo. Scient. de la Mer Mediterranee. Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB). 1995. Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin. 171 pp. 19 u u J APPENDIX A j.� SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS J v J J J J J J i APPENDIX A.1 STABILITY CALCULATIONS FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS i v l u J J J J Table A.1-1. Summary of Pycnocline Depths(m), Stability,and Fecal Coliform Concentrations (MPN/100 mL) During Fall 1996 Surveys. Orange County Santaoon 0isinct Cahrorn a STATION STABILITY DATE STATION DEPTH(m) PYCNOCLINE (Y=Yes) FECAL COLIFORMS R25 Bottom of Pycnodine Stable Surface Midwater Bottom 09126/1996 0-20 19 18 Y <20 <20 <20 09/26/1996 21N-20 19 17 V <20 <20 <20 0926/1996 39N-20 19 10 V <20 <20 <20 0926/1996 9N-20 19 15 Y <20 <20 <20 0926/1996 95-20 18 16 V <20 <20 <20 0926/1996 STN-0 56 28 Y <20 230 20 092611996 STN-14A 29 18 Y <20 <20 80 0926/1996 STN-28A 29 28 V <20 <20 -20 0926/1996 STN-37A 54 33 Y <20 <20 na 0926/1996 STN-X 24 12 23 Y <20 <20 <20 0926/1996 STN-V 32 10 27 V <20 <20 20 09/30/1996 0-20 20 1 15 V <20 <20 700 09/30/1996 21N-20 20 4 19 V <20 <20 <20 09/30/1996 39N-20 20 2 13 Y <20 <20 <20 09/30/1996 9N-20 20 12 16 Y <20 <20 <20 09/30/1996 95-20 20 1 8 Y <20 <20 20 09/30/1996 STN-0 55 16 42 V <20 <20 <20 09/30/1996 STN-14A 29 12 28 V <20 <20 <20 09/30/1996 STN-28A 29 5 26 V <20 <20 5000 _ 09/30/1996 STN-37A 55 16 40 V <20 500 40 09130 99996 STN-X 25 15 20 Y <20 <20 <20 09/30/1996 STN-Y 33 21 26 V <20 <20 1300 10/10/1996 0-20 19 7 12 V <20 1 QO 20 10/10/1996 2114-20 19 2 9 V 1 <20 <20 <20 10/10/1996 39N-20 18 2 8 Y <20 <20 <20 10110/1996 9N-20 19 7 11 Y <20 20 <20 10/10/1996 95-20 19 6 18 Y <20 <20 <20 10/10/1996 STN-0 54 22 26 Y <20 9000 130 10/10/1996 STN-14A 28 5 18 V <20 40 <20 10/10/1996 STN-28A 30 9 18 Y <20 <20 40 _ 10/10/1996 STN-37A 54 8 18 Y <20 40 <20 10/10/1996 STN-X 19 7 12 Y <20 <20 20 10/10/1996 STN-Y 32 6 10 1 V <20 <20 130 10/14/1996 0-20 18 15 16 V <20 <20 <20 10/14/1996 2114-20 19 3 9 Y <20 <20 <20 10/14/1996 39N-20 18 15 17 V <20 -20 <20 10/14/1996 9N-20 19 14 16 V <20 <20 <20 10/14/1996 95-20 18 & Y <20 <20 <20 10/14/1996 STN-0 55 7 21 Y <20 <20 2400 10/14/1996 STN-14AA32 11 24 Y <20 <20 <20 10/14/1996 STN-28A 9 23 V <20 <20 <20 10/14/1996 STN-37A 15 27 Y <20 <20 <20 10/14/1996 STN-X 10 20 Y <20 <20 <20 10/1411996 STN-Y 6 22V <20 20 <20 10/23/1995 0-20 Y <20 16000' 9"21N-20 12 18 V <20 <20 230 A.1-1 JT (m) STABILITY DATE STATION PYCNOCLINE (Y=Ves) FECAL COLIFORMS Top of Bottom of Pywoctine Pycnocline Stable Surface Midwaler Bottom 10/23/1996 39N-20 Y <20 20 20 1023/19% 9N-20 13 15 Y <20 <20 500 102311996 95-20 14 15 Y <20 <20 170 1023/19% STN-0 8 23 Y <20 <20 300 1023/1996 STN-14A 9 12 V <20 <20 1<200 1023/1996 STN-28A 8 18 Y <20 <20 16000 1023/1996 STN-37A 14 17 Y <20 20 230 10/23/1996 STN-X 23 15 16 V <20 <20 500 10/23/1996 STN-Y 31 9 18 Y <20 80 230 10/28/1996 020 19 7 9 V -20 300 230 10/28/1996 21N-20 18 8 10 V 20 80 500 10/28/1996 39N-20 19 8 17 Y 20 <20 230 10128/1996 9N-20 18 2 6 V <20 300 1700 10128/1996 95.20 19 Y 80 500 230 10128/1996 STN-0 54 23 27 Y 20 300 800 10128/1996 STN-14A 27 19 23 Y <20 500 2400 102811996 STN-28A 31 10 23 Y 20 20 120� 102811996 STN-37A 55 16 23 Y 20 20 102811996 STN-X 25 11 15 Y 70 300 1028/1996 STN-V 33 5 14 V <20 <2011/05/1996 0-20 18 V <20 <2011/05/1996 21N-20 19 V <0 <2011/05/1996 39N-20 18 Y <20 <2011/05/19% 9N-20 19 10 11 Y <20 20 11/0511996 95-20 18 Y <20 <2011/05/1996 STN-0 56 32 48 Y <20 500011/05/1996 STN-14A 29 21 22 Y <20 <20 11/05/1996 STN-28A 29 Y <20 <20 130 11/05/1996 STN-37A 56 29 41 Y <20 <20 <20 11/05/1996 STN-X 25 V -20 <20 40 11/05/1996 STN-Y 32 Y <20 40 <20 11/13/1996 0-20 18 V <20 -20 20 11113/1996 21N-20 18 V <20 <20 <20 11/1311996 3914-20 19 Y <20 <20 <20 1111311996 9N-20 18 Y <20 20 <20 11/1311996 95-20 19 Y <20 <20 <20 11/1311996 STN-0 54 29 36 Y 20 1300 5000 11/13119% STN-14A 28 22 23 Y <20 40 130 11/13/1996 STN-28A 28 24P24 V <20 <20 80 11/1311996 STN-37A 52 33 Y <0 40 230 11/1311996 STN-X 23 Y <20 <20 800 11/13/1996 STN-Y 30 24 Y <20 <20 -20 11/20/1996 0-20 19 5 Y <20 500 5000 1120/1996 21N-20 18 Y <20 <20 130 11/20/1996 39N-20 19 Y <20 20 40 1120/1996 9N-20 18 1Y <20 230 2400 11/20/1996 95-20 18 4Y 40 90 3000 �. 11/20/1996 STN-0 56 25 V <20 20 1<200 1120/1996 STN-14A 28 18 Y <20 40 5000 11/20/199 STN-28A 28 18 19 V <20 300 9000 ll20/1996 STN-37A 56 35 42 1 Y <20 1 <20 1 <20 A.1-2 STATION STABILITY DATE STATION DEPTH(m) PYCNOCLINE (Y=Yes) FECAL COLIFORMS Tap of Bottom of r - Pycnocline Pycnodine Stable Surface Midwater Bottom 11/20/1996 STN-X 24 7 22 Y <20 <20 3000 11/20/1996 STN-Y 31 12 21 Y <20 40 9000 r 11/25/1996 0-20 18 1 14 Y <20 40 40 11/25/1996 21N-20 18 2 15 Y <20 20 130 11/25/1996 39N-20 18 8 10 Y <20 <20 <0 11/25/1996 9N-20 19 1 15 Y <20 170 80 r 11/25/1996 95-20 18 1 14 Y <20 20 20 1125/1996 STN-0 56 13 25 Y <20 130 t30 11Y25/1996 STN-14A 28 14 21 Y 20 40 2400 11/25/1996 STN-28A 28 12 20 Y 20 20 80 r 11/25/t996 STN-37A 56 2 17 Y <20 40 40 11/25/1996 STN-X 23 13 18 Y 20 20 170 11/25/1996 STN-Y 31 10 14 Y <20 <20 230 r •Differences in pycnocline density measurements atone meter intervals less than 0.05. 'Over method limit of 16,000. r r r r A.1-3 APPENDIX A.2 COLIFORM DATA FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS i OT4LCOLIFOHN 130 1 FECAL COLIFONM 130 P7¢MB R26, 996 N 20 na 22N �19N10 `2N I MAN <ID 1N ` 20 a0\ 15N 10 z0 9N WINIa zoo <211, 13_0 20 <211 z0_'20 1211 120 1120. - _ 120 a0Na na,a0 D - <211 Na11120` N .x 211 x11A 211 <211 0 ,na < N <2U <2U' <2U J 120 �`<201BF I(!1 80I < of NY MS'20 <20 <20: 21! .<20 �<201 <211'. _ vss x i 20 '_`20' xlOmners <211 mks <21j <211 230 20 3 3 3 8 Figure A.2-1. Coliform Data (MPNI100mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, September 26, 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. O,aye County SanikLoo DAtmi.caMpnre TOTALCOLIFQRM <2D 1 recawauroaM nx 3N P'f@MB R 30, 996 «0 V. Be. no 27N '....e.. aCMN20 120 a 4.0x <20 21N <30 _ <i0 Y, n ne 20 n� 15N L�na N ¢d Q1N20 y �ON20IL' 20a 40' na a e..n<20 < x00 <2 Q na <xg'�9 cwaN <20 <20 a ne <20 20 2 <io < M0 M �t) 0 < 9520 0 <20 ® 5 00 130 .. <20 D ss.gx NIID'melal5 / �7p 11 20 nllaa <:Tg allll 70 40 21) 3 3 3 a a Figure A.2.2. Coliform Data (MPN/100mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, September 30, 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. orange Ccenly Marntaikn Dialect,Celilorria. T.I.L L04 F;]RM 1 'EGL CDuvortM CT®BE 10, 19 6 2714 119N20 I' ]w.4x 211 �20 �ry � zo - <20 0 15N <2 9N e211420 c 20 <201 200 21 20ON20 2 > K 201 I<zo�,�, iv �% <20 <2� se. - @MA <20 <20 49 ry �� <20 -21I 20 40 _II g9p -. 'A{ �IZ� •<20 <20 w • 'm 120 I 20.- <20 -20 20 \ o Nllomeiers_ / e37A 16 ] ✓/ 1211I mi -les p 20 9000 0 30 a Figure A.2-3. Coliform Data (MPNI100mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, October 10, 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. Orange County Sanilalion DjedO.CaMom roxu <20 vEini iouroxu ne CT®BE 14 , 19 6 9N Jn mlw era[r na 27N -. a19N20 no� 6 m.6x - }0 21N � <20.- <20 <20 15N 20 9N Q1N20 --,_ `20 <20, le, �..x <20 0 <211 <20 na <20 69 '— <20N20 na,1<20 D <211 _ oa~n*9 corwn n u% °20 na �3.0 d1.S <20, <2U. 0 N c20 <20 <2U 0 ( <20 <20 '&A 2 <20 <20. 6y !9520 <20 <211 <211 <20 211 <211 � . Wanmer6 037A ® � l 0 ea '10 <20 2n< <^2n' 2ann a Figure A.2-4. Coliform Data (MPN/100m L) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, October 14, 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. Orange county sanlWUm olsxicl Caldb ss 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I f 1 1 f 1 oiFL[OUFOxx zo /. /� , FE COLIig N V 20 CTt9BE 23 19 6 3 <20.. w N Mva 27N 09NIO to l alx <20 -20 20 �21N 20 <20 ism 20 20 N a'MA 20 ,20 a_ 7 <20 n4 Lo 230 <20 IO_ 20 <20 a9Na 20 <20� rD c00 - -_na. z9\ axd I 11 20 n xq�o x% xtdA < U I6000 < II 0 9000 a, 2 'Af1j <21) 50 500 SBA 1100 20, <w x9S20 20 '_U 1'000 ,O 2 0 wlmrlra - CM a a 20 Ilia <21 20 _ '<20 230' 700' 3 3 3 � 8 Figure A.2-5. Coliform Data (MPNI100mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, October 23, 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. 0­ .C-1, caIft o TOTAL murONM ao I FECALLOLOOPM Qpl 3N CT®BE 2 , 19 6 I <20 I Are wwl <29 27N a39N20 Q9 a 0.0H 21N 2p ' nDa 20 230 '1<2ao 19N 2 Or N - QiN20 F807 20, Co z0 w ww, 0 R0 z0 00 sop 20 eo J0 9ON20 l20 300 D 170_ - 90_ <z0 9 pare.. m - <20 <zo 120 "+ 7/A 7p 300 a. ry ,20 300 �230 2 5110 300 QBA �g 20 2400 2p W RO 20 <21 500 e —'—- I 20 <20 211 2io xlEmxxe'. / x31A 211 ® 20 011188 <$p T R_oo 9 3 3 Figure A.2-6. Coliform Data (MPNI100mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, October 28, 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. orange Caunly sanXxwn Dlxncl.California 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 cuuwa,., 900 1 �E=:==uuroNN eo. N OVLYMB R , 19 6 20 27N . N20 TinO I Y.eN <211 NN ±0i 21N < 2111 300 20 15N i <20 9N - Q1N.z0 u, 1220 <20 80 w 0 <20 40 }00 J0 <20 <20.170 21) .01420 c40 +� <20 :u .X <10 J/ .<z0. .2 ai�iv .14A 2 20 < 11 N < o N a20 <20 ±Ili z <20 411 FBA AU <2p, .y .9520 <20 <20 <211 o s..N <10 <20 Itilomners / .J 20 <}1i ® 20 '20 mbs < 11 5000 <20 24011 3 Figure A.2-7. Coliform Data (MPN1100m L) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, November 5. 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. 0.,.C—.,,samla.M.t.,CaN .. TOTAL COLIFpRM 1301 a FECALCOLIFCRM no VLsMB R 3, 1 96 •...,..,> 3N i, 230 na 27N +.. a39N20 8 00 3411.1111 20 ��2IN <20 "'AAA no 15N <20 ne N QiN.20 9g <20 ne RU annual <20 Ina l 40 <20 1 it. 20 20.aeNlO ne Sao y <20 m_ <20 9 Iv {<20 �IN, ne Ni W, Co ex 0 <20 <20 -�na_, N <20 211 <211 _ 40; RIM IQBII 110 <20 Q <20 <20 __ <20 -. o x4 80 hllOmmeis. 20 miles 20 40 U001230 '� Rif() 3 3 3 Figure A.2-8. Coliform Data (MPNI100mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, November 13, 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. orange county Sameson Dlamtl.California. 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL CO L IFORM <20 ,p 1 FECAL COLIdo RM no VCMB R 0, 1 96 IN i`t1 N e..e a 27N -. ... 091420 .:20 g MLOx <20 no�21N 20 gll no a 19N 20 �no N ei N20 ,201 no III 130 na<�jj ",ti01 231 e6N20 a- > N .c211 ^ 2a0 Otl Yro e1114 �2111 N 1171 211' S11111� „ �k1 1 40 '30011 (r6A/// 9520� 2 1 SII0IIII _II/ �Y e1111I '-II III a x 9111111 �11I '111 AS.gH ® / 9I1116 JIIIIII k9oroetent J// 117A Q� a„ m11ee - 111 211 211 211 1100 } } } 8 i S Figure A.2.9. Coliform Data (MPNI100ml-) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, November 20, 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. Orange county sanuauon olerict California. •O,ALcourpXx 500 1 FECAL CouroRM na 3N VLMB R 5, 1 96 • Sao xu, npo e.w a nx �9x zo 3 rEx <2x 1_na 21N <20` 300 20 nA 15N .va?: 1800 N QiN20 .,30 a30 , "a 500 20 "a 3001 IJO <20 na 230 1]O IONa na 1300 00 na 1500 9 <20 a�lion alw o 14A 20 40 0 n. N,. 20 20 40 411 17II SBA 2400 211 .v 3s 2n LI &1A NO g 211 n 0 ,i 11 ll kllomeleia''. —/// Xpq is 2ll ® 201) mrea < II0 1n un Figure A.2-10. Coliform Data (MPNI100mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, November 25, 1996. Offshore data represent near-surface, mid-depth, and near-bottom samples. orange County Xannanon Olsmcl.Cal romla. f f f I I I I I I I I I I I I I J :.i I APPENDIX A.3 I Li AMMONIUM DATA FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS I .d v J v J v 314 s 011 (m /L) l ., xn npo aswr E7N dON20 3 ae.ox o.01 E1N 0.01 <o.oz " 15N 9N 01 001 w e 0.01 0.0E <0.01 <0 Di eON30 w . . i.0.0n cwan. elf '<001 °rl xrr all 0.01 00E 0 N °.01 0.01 <°01 _ I 0.01 0.11 IyN <0.01 1:001 w e9530 _ 0.01 _ <0.01 o z 0.03- <O.1 Oml \ Ae.eX ® 0.0E k1losselers sa7A ® Q^J - mllea 1<0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.o11 3 3 Figure A.3.1. Ammonium Data(r lL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, September 26, 1996. Data represent near-surface to near-bottom samples. orange county SanlWean District,Calllwnia. IU m L) " S EMBE 30 99 x r1}a NW _ nx .0.01 uxn.zo f�lY D.02 0.02 II1\N\ i5N N _iIll 0 <0.01 Yvn <0.01 0.01 .. <o:m .exm D o.aa OAt 0 % c D.0 O u N .1/A c0.01 2 0.03 N <00 0A2 <0 0 1 _ 0.02 0.01 c A Y YDS]0 . O.Dt <0.01 <1001 \. 0.04 < .01 ))SAx J O.O 002 MYmelne. CM 0,01 n�1eY <OA1 0.12 <0.01 <0.01 o.m k 3 3 x Figure A.M. Ammonium Data(mg/L)Collected During Water Duality Surveys, September 30, 1996. Data represent near-surface to near-bottom samples. 0.'.C-1,S-1.1—0.s,iCI.C.111.ma. r A NILJM ( 91 ) 311 OC rya BMW 2/N B39NA B m.Bx 1c 0.01i <0.011 21N 0.03 15N 9N 1N30 <U.01i .n B. 0 <0.01 _ 0.02 D <0,014ON30 L, 0.02 w <0,6i C� 0.06 <0.01 002 �a N <0.01 <0.01 2 O.. 0001 xY x9Sd0 0.01 1 0,01I I<0.01' 0.04 0D1 002 \ 044 0.02 NOomerers x32A 0 11 B I1<a 01 mllea <0.011lI 0,00 001 3 3 3 $ 8 d Figure A.3-3. Ammonium Data (mg/L)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,October 10, 1996. Data represent near-surface to near. bottom samples. Orange Coumv 9annanarn Dlsmd Calilarma. 3" ONIUM ( IL) �, ro 21N 09NIO o m're cool 21x <001 \ <0o1 \T 15N 911 Willa 0.01 <0.01 a.os 001 <0NI0 D 0.01 vw wn �x <0. 01 i14p 0.1010 0 < <0.1 1 <0.01 a.01 <0.01 - Z <0.01 <0.01 O.Ot < 801 y .9920 c001 <0.01 <O.Ot 0.01 <0.01 c0U1 p 05AN / <a.01 <o 01 1®omelmc �0 01 ® . xas <o.oi <0 .x1 <O.o1 <0.01 0.01 3 3 Figure A.3-4. Ammonium Data (mg/L) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, October 14, 1996. Data represent near-surlace to near- bottom samples. 0. ,.coumr S.n.1-D„Ind,cawmmu 1 I I f 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 i I I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 N ORIUM (m IL) O an qn eaW 27N g ag.gN <0.01. 21N 0.01 j 0.01 15N �s 9N ....`i Q1N 2 0 <00 awn 0.01 103 0 0.011 0.01 eBN20 i" <0.01 "- w e. % 0.18 N d<A <0.01 0.08 . ry <0.01 0.01 , <001 008 WBA 0.05 <0.01 rN <0.01 lul0melers o <e tulles - I<001 I <0.01 ( � �• <a.o1 000� ��,-/ll f . B s Figure A.3-5. Ammonium Data (mg/L)Collected During Water Quality Surveys, October 23, 1996. Data represent near-surface to near- bottom samples. Orange County sanilalion Dislncl Cellbmia. 1 N 01MUM m /L) 27H x05N20 o.w.ox <a.at ]1N 001 o.0a 15N 9N Q1N20 1 0.01 m e�vr Q 0.0a e05 a.01 0.05 ON2a D o os ma m •z 0.01 0x xr 014A <O.Ot 002i ry �01 0.0a oolj n}If 0.w 0.06 o.os <0,- w •9S20 <a.OY. _ <0. . ' e �a.01' 00101 00 O.at 12 \ vs.xx / <0.01 0.03 xtlomalms x07A 0.01 xNpg <o at <o a1 <0.01 <001 3 3 Figure A.M. Ammonium Data (mg/L) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, October 28, 1996. Data represent near-surface to near- bottom samples. O,ao a cow,san,muon D,sxCl.ealif-a. 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 l I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 311 N ONRJM ( g L) 2711 0<xex <0.01 21H 0.01 0.02 15N N o.a1 w w.0 O.01 O.ot 0.01 ON30 0.03 w _ N <041 <U.U] W0.01 0 z <0.01 <0.01 YY Y9510 <o.m _tom g.m 0.01 001 O.o1� 002 hnMMeis-. is 1 0.01 . ® 0.01 n•• o 01 0.02 e 3 ! e Figure A.3.7. Ammonium Data (mg/L) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, November 5, 1996. Data represent near-surface to near. bottom samples. Orange County SoniWuan District.Cslilornla. A NO ON(UM ( g L) N n}a B�u 27N s191,110 1 xg.ax -<0.01 21N 0.01 0,01 15N N "i s.1 N an. Q <o.oi 0.02,, '<a.01 0.O1x9N20 ➢ g.ot 9 c a+ W 0.01 Wi xr 0X 0.01 0 0Do 1 0.01 0 02 N 0.01' <0.01, 1 <0.01 0.02 Qiy 0.03 <00p �Y a9510 <n.o1 <a.Of. <o.a' ¢ e03 ca.01 <O.01'. \ mlomme�s / e92A mike 0.01 0.03 o.oa 3 3 3 Figure A.3-8. Ammonium Data (mglL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys, November 13, 1996. Data represent near-surface to near-bottom samples. Orange county Sensation District,California. 1 1 1 1 1 [ [ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 7 1 4 1 / 1 1 1 P I 1 311 A ONR1M ( 9 L) NO M roam nn N 91420 YAN 0.02 0 Ot 21N 061 15n 914 0,0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01.wMa ➢ 0.03 �w w c0.01 ONb N14A 0 0.0 � c 0.01 O.OT �\ N <0.01 c 0.01� -- 2 I <0.of 0.06' Ajy 0." .01 NY N9s20 0.011 <0.01 <0.01 11.1ac0A1 <o of \ ]]SAN 0.04 0.01 MNOmelers CM ® 0.01 miles c 0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0 01 c 0.01 3 3 3 Figure A.3-9. Ammonium Data (mglL) Collected During Water Duality Surveys, November 20, 1996. Data represent near-surface to near-bottom samples. 0, ,co.my So I.I4 D�.o-�n.crow N ONIUM (m /L) nN ,19Ha c0.01 _ 31N 0.01 0.01 v\\ 15N N �lN20 <001. 0.°s 0.04 00.exz° w 0.05 9 o < 6 0. 1 ramp or rr .11A <001 0. 2 0 ry ` `0.01 M o.ot I(@II o.ai ooi Z 002 ,U11 W 9520 <0.01 <001 — <0.W <0.01' <001 - ns.0x kiwn0leix+ / CM _ J <0.a1 m0es _ <0.01 <a.01 001 <0,01 r Figure A.3-10. Ammonium Data(mg/L)Collected During Water Quality Surveys, November 25, 1996. Data represent near-surface to near-bottom samples. Onnge County S.M.t on OmInd.Calxama. y b+ eJ f a} APPENDIX A.4 1J TEMPERATURE-SALINITY PLOT DATA FOR 1996 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS I J W wad .i N i w1 w u r 09126196 20 41♦ 19 � n 18 17 0 16 ♦ ' � ♦ ♦ 15 ♦ E14 13 12 11 10 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity (ppt) • STN 0 IN 0-20 21N-20 ♦ 39N-20 • 9N-20 • 9S-20 ■STN 14A - STN 28A- STN 37A STN X STN Y Figure A.4-1. Temperature-Salinity (T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey, September 26, 1996. Orange county sanitation Dart, CoYmmla A.4.1 09t30t96 20 19 — 18 _ �y 17 16 — d a m 15 d E 14 ■ f— 13 — 12 " 11110 11 10 — 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity (ppt) — • STN 0 ■ 0-20 21N-20 ♦ 39N-20 • 9N-20 • 9S-20 ■STN 14A - STN 28A — STN 37A STN X STN Y Figure A.4-2. Temperature-Salinity(T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey,September 30, 1996. Orange Co,o:y San,a an DIznc Oa Imm1a A.4.2 r r r 1O110/96 r 20 - - - __ .-- - - - -- I 19 r » 18 .P 17 — r i 0 16 15 . . _ n 14 r d ~ 13 - --- k6. r 12 1110 .. 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity (ppt) ♦ STN 0 ■ 0-20 21 N-20 ♦ 39N-20 ♦ 9N-20 095-20 ■STN 14A -STN 28A STN 37A STN STN Figure A.4-3. Temperature-Salinity(T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey, October 10, 1996. A.4.3 10/14/96 .. 20 19 18 i 17 U c 16 m ' 15 .. m EE 14 ~ 13 12 11 10 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity (ppt) • STN 0 ■ 0-20 21 N-20 ♦ 39N-20 • 9N-20 • 95-20 ■STN 14A - STN 28A - STN 37A STN X STN Y Figure A.4-4. Temperature-Salinity(TS( Plots for Water Quality Survey,October 14, 1996. A.4.4 r a i 10123196 20 r 19 .. 18 NM• ►�-� 17 v 0 16 15 a 14 t ✓C ~ 13 l - - r 12 11 r 10 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 �7 Salinity (ppt) • STN 0 ■ 0-20 21N-20 • 39N-20 ♦ 9N-20 • 9S-20 ■STN 14A - STN 28A- STN 37A STN X STN Y Figure A.4-5. Temperature-Salinity IT-SI Plots for Water Quality Survey, October 23, 1996. A 4.5 10/28/96 20 19 18 _ 17 0 16 r' 1s q • — N E 14 ■�' F a — 13 — 12 11 10 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity (ppt) 17 • STN 0 ■ 0-20 21N-20 ♦ 39N-20 ♦ 9N-20 • 95-20 r •STN 14A - STN 28A - STN 37A STN X STN Y Figure A.4-6. Temperature-Salinity(T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey,October 28, 1996. A.4.6 11/05/96 20 19 18 17 O ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ _ � ,' _ c 16 m m 15 w E 14 d = ~ 13 .. 12 11 10 32.9 33 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity (ppt) ♦ STN 0 ■ 0-20 21N-20 • 39N-20 ♦ 9N-20 ♦ 95-20 ■ STN 14A - STN 28A STN 37A STN X STN Y Figure A.4-7. Temperature-Salinity(T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey, November 5, 1996. AA 7 11113/96 20 _ 19 18 17 c U 0 16 m 15 _ E 14 w ~ 13 12 .. 11 10 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity (ppt) • STN 0 ■ 0-20 21N-20 ♦ 39N-20 ♦ WN ♦ 9S-20 ■STN 14A - STN 28A STN 37A STN X STN Y Figure A.4-8. Temperature-Salinity (T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey, November 13, 1996. r A.4.8 11/20196 20 19 18 17 $ 16 a, 15 E 14 ■ 12 11 10 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity (ppt) ♦ STN 0 ■ 0-20 21 N-20 ♦ 39N-20 ♦ 9N-20 • 9S-20 IN STN 14A - STN 28A— STN 37A STN X STN Y Figure A.4-9. Temperature-Salinity(T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey, November 20, 1996. A.4.9 11/25/96 20 19 18 17 g 16 m 15 + t■ E 14 T w � ~ 13 M►M 12 ee 11 10 32.9 33 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 _ Salinity (ppt) • STN 0 ■ 0-20 21N-20 ♦ 39N-20 • 9N-20 • 9S-20 ■STN 14A - STN 28A- STN 37A STN X STN Y Figure A.4.10. Temperature-Salinity(T-S)Plots for Water Quality Survey, November 25, 1996. A.4,10 u I APPENDIX A.5 vi TEMPERATURE AND SALINITY PLOTS BY DEPTH FOR 1996 it WATER QUALITY SURVEYS i I ! t�l d r ��1 1 l l t 1 1 Q t ! 1 ! 1 ! 1 ( ! I l 29N-20 wqp cl 21N.20 slur W..? IN 20 pnlmp cl 0.20 wralrpcl 9930 nn�Mq ID A 30 10 re{ ro mmrylpwlye uoxrytvwlros ulminmrn„ 12. xr ull�:nuwlr]s131 unanlwn y +�Ppcl 20a w"weq v rr.lreq 0 yrrlreq aTA .w..—Npcl 10 SI.1 1w! ♦^ 24 p{ 9 6e ]2 D }e 6 xe En , ro 72Y , ,?I R➢ l va♦ IIprI nNYlroll]]9 ..IInIX ]].e a.n...mvn N pp uulWyd x \ 3 ro .ran '" .N.xo usniXlwll]]] ulmimm�lros !e .V '9320 I—Tempanature vxN —Salinity ]x.• , ,Li�rmwlvn m Figure A.5-1. Temperature and salinity profiles for September 26, 1996. Orange County Sanitation Distnct,California. ]9x-x0 u.IMcl ].x.ID W q. c) Bx-20 nv�ld>n .1. .nwru.M,CI 9a-x0 N q is : � s i' E. D DI II, D, A]. Dr D> D, u Ex ➢5 Ex ' ,.GrIw05 D� Df E. Df DI.MIMIDf U1 Y8YP1 % xTnu.pq Cl ]M 4w.u.paC1 Y 1 .1M1 or 0 n .i "Cl EA x.pr 4u C1 E a E A .I{J1 3 : :: Sm m I 14 or 9' • EJJ{J{ H{ D n m 3m1 a Rf a E, D� ES Df nr II, Ill D d Y C4 u pn m a a _ •!1N m m n UI V 5� n x Y D� n MI E, II9 ] Dx [ A .14A m .rwoDf ' ,.WwwvS 9a a —Temperature ,ore —Salinity Figure A.5-2. Temperature and salinity profiles for September 30, 1996. Orange County Sanitation District.California ! I I I I I I I ! t I 1 I 1 I 39N 20 —.lave or 21N-20 n,,,i Weq 9W20 n u nIgcl 0-20 nmpmun(Bwd 9S20 uvlBnd I. I. 1. a ] a2 a ] m 201 119 AB A] p.1 L1 )>] ]) HMNMIWO IIMry1M1 Htll!wy"a HMI"lp., ' 9nIIMry1Wn % slaved 20A un lMq I, slaved 0 unlBved ]]p nru.q u `s gel = m• a]B1 m d xBi d m� d m1 t n� tea!D zsi nl rn W R.9 l V.5 )J] R9 ] ]]] ]xs l �] l' enlnNYbTI HVIIMrylpp,l]l5 9aIIm,Y IpoO]] idp —11ftcl .3N-0 IQ rz� t u1 Y-2 ]2, ,Nelapinur 1pwa' s •as zall —TemperaWre a]A Salinity Figure A.5.3. Temperature and salinity profiles for October 10, 1996. Orange County Sanitation District,Califomia. 3ON40 ]vmwtvlun W...1 21N-M onlweq BNdO unlaveq 030 wlaq l c paQO wp.Bzi tz tE� jl0 ] tH ] le� a a 'a J/J��py �'� � tP � � 1• d II Y9 'I HVIINrylwlllf ]]r RB l].I HNniry IPNI 5 ]]1 ]3P NFIrybMI H ]]l Ue ]]I HtlInIIY ]tI RB ]LI 13 I]5 ]ll WHO VNNXY IMI X mine el 2. vwnlwecl V rvnwnW.WHM 0 utv lavpcl TA fimNnNn W'.el ]0 6 30� 331 pH el Nl i j# 4 aYi 1.8 p o]Hn 1 33 l nH nr ] B 311 n] 1 15 m r ]ne ],II nH jS n l f u� gss wn."pY., stl.I.IPNI SW IN,(Poll N " unBlavv 4 e o .ilrv3\ SB�, E952 N1 3ff 9WZ0 \ "I. X V ]]B ] Htll1 1 ]}B > ]]] ]]5 11 4A Q0 I.Y loot) ] HNIn..Y1PN1 33 'I .V '95.0c —Temperature ]zB nt -37A _—Salinity_ uY mNln Figure A.5-4. Temperature and salinity profiles for October 14, 1996. Orange County Sanilalion Dietncl,Cnlif.rrHe i r i ] I r I r I r t r ( r r r 1 I ► ► I ► ► t ► t ► ► ► 1 ► 1 ► ► l ]BN.xo lu.lew cl R]Ndo N,,.Irycl Yx.io m,p P.Bm B.xo „p.e cl 9e40 „lew cl a3� A IP ML Ai Pw.m unless Px.mwn .nmN mro]B eaxnr lwn v e.wmlerll x mm.nr.lrpn sap nro„n„.wwq r ro c, TA Z., ]� BI° 31° 0 { $a. to ve ] ] s m ]xB ]]I ! pv] m] nNv tern] lArvleMl 9.nm,Y 1ppll'• 'x x uo ]P Y Pj is .xlv.ao <e b W x !]xP ]]] ])! E ]0 I "eq ZO j1 WlMrylwll ednNYlppllns '9S.H1, \ —Temperature L 's]" —Salinity ]3 . Figure A.5-5. Temperature and salinity profiles for October 23, 1996. Orange County Sanitation District.California. zsx-zo ..aypq rx-zo .»Iweq 914-211 e»IYpq 040 r.»1.—W.cl 9s.]o Ye cl xl 3 a10 Ir o I a 1. § xl Ia� m x 61 xo 8sil� 3 zo� s m�_ sss us "I lzs ol 1)s ]p, ]'a lv p?5 __ __n r Winiylpgl WINry1Pol 91NIrybMl35 uxnybpl 5 .xxylpp a ».I.-, apP 9"1 y w»IYpCI 0 un 1YW C1 a", wn lr»e cl 11 a e zj 1z 112 11 �e 1. 1. is ais x $n azz aN� � is N Eat D 3a N st pl 119 ll, RB ]M1] 9 ]l, 32 Wlnly leexl)5 f15MIMrylOall 5 Wlnx Ipoll a N [ 'N 1M w1. 1. 1. Is , 42 0 is is roi 9W 0 IaP .y g RB 11 1 uWxYleNlm ]] o.) ]].9 "I 9mmIYlrpn24 n, '2 .Y •9 Temperature. .sln —Salinity xe ] ,II.V.Iwnu yr Figure A.5-6. Temperature and salinity profiles for October 28, 1996. Orange County Sanitation District California. i I t [ i t ! i r t 1 r l l r t r 1 r 1 r 30N-20 en l0.pq 21N-" e,.Pa9d IN-20 un l0aeq 0-20 )S wn watt Os3o p,n,enlr9d i � 4 ,itw IB IB IS 01 I m1. Rn v At x]te y, II° nt R9 l lY R9 l sSr Re ]ll SWnM IMIs0.s °NnMIPPII)5 wwrylpNl 5 .Xnnv lPNll s wMM1lpplv5 y u.W..., 2" M ry 1".0 Y u^la.ed 0 unlW cl 37A um Id" tl Ii I ro x xm xo a ail a e ` r0 l01 ar a L za v 0 i InuY ]° l9°nlin Ilr °nlNnlpglY]s yr °dn 1 9min ] ¢ I Ilv loP,I III ' S� �e� HA wnoap C01 .3... 40 01�0 x. •TN \ � yp0 --� a e aN.i° ll, mw9 ealpN16 n m r ] n' wlmnr lrmlon. R zoi 522ssm _ x+ Temperature! lei —1 •])n —$Biinity RII l Smm�lnOpl n/ Figure A.5.7. Temperature and salinity profiles for November 5, 1996. Orange County Sanitation District.California. 39"0 un 1..cl 21N.20 wnlayq 911.20 Tw,—"m lag cl 0--20 raeinlWq OS40133 ureleaec, Is rt st 0 131 anlnllxlw0]5 exmryypl BvwrMlwY evllneylpgl v 6Y191ry Its % nle.eq 2. ry leap cl Y un1a9Q 0 nlaycl VA nla9 x,0 ai l Is 1e s s $xx J as Ent EZM, z. L ]nv >Or s ze1 xe! a xa x9 s.wrlry]I ul l«nl s ]I 113 3v1nM1oop5 sainln lw,l]]s _ 8 � y Tvmrymm.lee991 ]0 a� t ,6� QIN30 W 9Wxa p9 I ] ] .1 E9 113 3 35 311 `{xx 'IOP X �p StlInIry1VV,I15 eallnNy 19N1 E x 1z 0 ]ts ] n' ,�, — ° —Temperatures, ,3]A'9a —Salinlry wmnlwn Figure A.". Temperature and salinity profiles for November 13. 1996. Orange County Sanitation District.California. 1 I 1 1 ( 1 I It 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 391430 ur.lawd 21H 20 nmPo•.u'nlapd M20 lure lap cl 030 wnlapcl 99Q0T777 lapel 41 c II1/(1}I�l1III 929 ° 99, 92.9 9 9 9>, 2>9 9 -9 22, >:.9 29.7 nxvlMlvs ulullybpla' 9wnxY1nP1' R'Swniry legl x vlmvlwll s % wlapq 2M unlepq y wpq.1 ° wnlapd 91R O.—...c1 R14 16 le sr „ ;_ 1 29 ZZ Sn En 32; °�:, 2v _ _ � b 929 w " 111 12a ' �, R or 9. ylPorl 9.IInIM1IPoY S.x I;InNIllS s Y{ a X 14A wal°.9 U� 21 NI. W� C10 a '> SN.p 3 ° taP ° '2a R9 ' sal^xYlvglls ,v v.9 131 s.IIwr ri Vii m> a 22 -2e Y •9520 m� I —Temperatures. Y2.9 a �> '°>P —Salinity s.Ilanrlmn2u Figure A.5-9. Temperature and salinity profiles for November 20, 1996. Orange County Sanitation District.California. 39N30 rnW..rwun14pC1 2IN40 wlMq ON." wnlWq .4o wnlMpcl es30 4mr,Mluu bNq of of RB l 3]] 1]t ]xB ] ]]l lRB 1 ]ll l3B ] }].] , l]3 RB ]]I 1IW ]].] ]ll ' pwMIry1M11] 1pNNIry IPM1]] Sl etllnlrylrop]5 pnlMnlMl 411°IryleMl % bWW.mIgcl 3Q —7-Wn WN.cl V N.lagq o wn IW.-1 ]xA renVwn la.pq II ,x ,B A °I zl n) Al le a ;e gg A $ 22 ID Z= 22 u d o ss. 0 3 p ms u3 up ] WW 3 v, )Sn , 9 ,z 111 5p t 31 .IlNnlrwl 3 YMInIMI]] slln�ry owl3. nsdv 3. 14A ].menMwe°p Cl .vW2o o �i ]. < l e eQl N.z9 �z v nr .lan a9 mr mwl ° ].� almnr mwl rl zz xa r ,9s-m z• / (_Salinity ure .23A —Salinity u9 W In, vz Figure A.5-10. Temperature and salinity profiles for November 25, 1996. Orange County Sanitation District,California. 1 v u APPENDIX B a.i SUPPLEMENTARY DATA FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS i1 it J iJ r.l ,•r 4 j Lu a.i i u J u :J it it i u APPENDIX B.1 : i L! STABILITY CALCULATIONS FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS ` i L.I V N V J I J J J r Mas Table B.I.I. Summary of Pycnocline Depths(m),Stability,and Fecal and Total Coliform Concentrations (MPN11100ml-)During Summer 1997 Surreys. Orange county Sanitation Distrkt.Caiilorne �- STABILITY STATION (Y=Yes', DATE STATION DEPTH Inn) PYCNOCLINE N=No) COLIFORMS Fecals Facets Faces Totals Totals Totals Top Bottom Stable Surface Midwater Bottom Surface Midwater Bottom 07/08/1997 15N-10 9 Y <10 <10 -10 10 07/08A997 15N-15 13 Y <10 -10 <10 00 <10 <10 07/08/1997 15N-20 21 Y <10 00 <10 <10 <10 <10 67/08/ 9997 2114-10 9 2 7 Y <ip <10 <10 <10 07/08/1997 21N-15 /3 Y <10 <10 00 00 <10 <10 07/08/1997 21N-20 18 Y <10 00 <10 00 <10 <10 07/08/1997 2714-10 9 Y <10 <10 10 <10 07/08/1997 27N-15 13 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 00 <10 07/08/1997 27N-20 17 Y 00 <10 <10 <10 <10 00 07/08/1997 33N-10 9 1 Y 1 -10 1 <10 1 <10 1 10 _ 07/08/1997 33N-15 15 13 14 Y 00 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 07/08/1997 33N-20 18 13 17 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 07/08/1997 3SN-10 9 6 7 Y <10 <10 10 10 07/00/1997 39N-15 13 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 07/08/1997 39N-20 17 11 16 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 00 07/08/1997 3N-10 9 Y <10 00 <10 10 07/08/1997 3N-15 14 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 07/08/1997 3N-20 22 16 17 N <10 <10 00 <10 <10 <10 r 07/08/1997 45N-10 14 8 13 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 07/08/1997 45N-15 13 Y <10 <10 <10 00 <10 <10 07/08/1997 45N-20 15 Y <10 <10 00 10 <10 10 07/08/1997 6N-10 9 Y <10 <10 10 10 r 071OW1997 614-16 14 1 1 N <10 <10 <10 00 <10 <10 071OW1997 6N-20 21 Y <10 I <10 <10 <10 I <10 00 07108/1997 9N-10 9 Y <10 <10 42 20 07/08/1997 9N-15 14 N <10 <10 <10 <10 10 00 071OW1997 9N-20 20 15 19 Y <10 <10 10 <10 <10 10 07115/1997 15N-10 9 1 6 Y 10 31 42 31 07115/1997 15N-15 14 1 12 Y <10 <10 <10 20 <10 00 07/15/1997 i5N-20 21 10 18 Y 10 <10 <10 10 10 00 07115/ 9997 21N-10 8 Y 10 <10 75 20 07/15/1997 21N-15 13 Y 10 10 410 75 53 20 07115/1997 21N-20 19 10 18 Y 10 00 <10 42 20 <10 07115/1997 27N-10 8 Y 10 <10 99 <10 r 07116/1997 27N-15 13 1 11 Y 00 10 <10 75 10 42 07115/1997 27N-20 1s 8 15 Y 10 10 00 10 10 10 07/15/1997 33N.10 10 2 9 Y 10 31 254 87 r 07/15/1997 33N.15 14 1 12 Y 10 10 10 87 42 31 07/16/1997 33N-20 18 2 15 Y 10 10 <10 236 10 20 07/15/1997 39N-10 8 Y 10 31 17B 42 07/15/1997 39N-15 13 1 12 Y 87 10 <10 384 75 <10 r 07/15/1997 39N.20 19 1 14 Y 10 <10 <10 238 <10 <10 07/16/1997 3N-10 10 2 8 Y <10 <10 10 00 07/75/1911 3N-15 15 3 5 Y 10 <10 <10 10 10 10 07/15/1997 3N-20 21 10 18 Y q0 <10 <10 10 20 20 r 07/15/1997 45N-10 10 2 9 Y 20 10 178 53 07/15/1997 45N.15 14 1 11 Y 20 10 <10 192 87 42 r 8,1.1 r STABILITY STATION ( =Yes; DATE STATION DEPTH(.) PVCNOCLINE N=No1 COLIFORMS _ Feoals Feoals Feoals Totals Totals Totals Tap Bottom Stable Surface Midweter Bottom SuRaoe Midmter SoBom 07/15/1997 45N-20 17 1 14 V 42 <10 10 324 <10 31 07/15/1997 6N-10 8 3 5 V <10 <10 00 10 07/15/1997 6N-15 13 2 6 Y 10 <10 -10 10 <10 10 07/15/1997 6N-20 20 8 18 Y <10 <10 <10 10 <10 <10 _. 07/15/1997 9N-10 9 2 5 Y <10 <10 10 10 07/1511997 9N-15 14 1 13 Y <10 10 <10 00 10 <10 y 07/1511997 9N-20 19 2 17 Y 10 <10 <10 53 <10 20 07IM1997 15N-10 8 Y <10 00 <10 <10 07IM1997 15N-15 14 10 11 Y -10 00 00 -10 110 <10 0722/1997 15N-20 22 9 21 Y <10 I <10 <10 -10 1 <10 <10 r 0722/1997 21N-10 8 4 6 Y <10 <10 -10 <10 072 1%7 21N-15 13 10 11 Y <10 -10 <10 10 <10 10 ' 0722/19W 21N-20 20 6 12 Y 00 00 <10 <10 <10 a10 0722/1997 27N-10 9 Y <10 00 53 10 0722/1997 27N-15 14 Y 00 10 00 <10 10 20 072W1%7 27WM i] Y 00 00 <10 10 -10 10 072W1997 33N-10 9 4 7 Y 00 00 00 </0 114 0722/1997 MW15 14 Y <10 <10 10 00 10 10 0722/1997 33N-20 19 Y <10 00 <10 <10 <10 00 072W197 39N-10 9 4 8 Y 00 00 10 20 07nW1%7 39N-15 14 8 10 Y <10 <10 <10 20 20 10 r 0722/1997 39N.20 13 1 10 1 12 Y I <10 1 <10 00 00 31 <10 0722/19W 3N.10 9 V 00 <10 00 00 07nWI97 3N.15 15 4 12 Y a10 137 42 00 1184 W5 0]22/197 3N-20 22 5 21 Y <10 -10 10 222 75 31 r 0722/197 45NA0 10 1 9 Y 164 31 2005 324 0]22/19W ISN-15 14 1 12 Y 207 -10 10 2005 87 75 0722/197 4514-20 16 4 6 Y 99 31 <10 831 406 31 0722/1997 6N-10 9 Y <10 <10 <10 00 07QV1997 6N-15 14 8 11 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 ott I <10 0722/1997 6 20 22 5 18 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 00 <10 072 1997 W10 8 Y 10 10 31 10 07WI997 9N-15 13 9 11 Y 00 00 00 <10 <10 00 � 0722/1997 9N-20 21 3 12 Y <10 I <10 <10 c10 00 20 0729/1997 15W10 9 1 5 Y <10 <10 10 <10 0729/1997 15N-15 14 Y <10 -10 10 00 00 10 0729/1997 15N-20 21 15 19 Y <10 -10 <10 <10 <10 <10 1111 0729/1997 21N-10 9 1 7 Y <10 <10 10 10 0729119W 21W15 13 5 12 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 10 07/8911997 21W20 19 Y <10 00 <10 00 <10 <10 0729/1997 27N-10 9 1 8 Y <10 <10 42 10 r 0729M997 27N-15 13 4 9 Y <10 <10 <10 31 1 20 1 75 072911997 27N-20 16 3 11 Y 10 <10 <10 20 10 10 072911997 33N-10 9 Y 10 <10 42 53 0729I1997 33N.15 14 5 10 Y 10 -10 <10 20 31 31 r O7/P9/1997 3314-20 18 4 13 Y 10 <10 -10 53 10 <10 0729/1997 39N-10 9 Y 00 10 <10 20 0729/1997 39N.15 14 5 10 Y <10 00 <10 42 31 <10 r 0729/1997 39N.20 18 5 13 Y 10 <10 -10 99 75 <10 0729/1997 3N-10 8 Y <10 10 20 10 0729/1997 314-15 14 10 12 Y- <10 <10 <10 00 <10 110 0729/1997 3N.20 22 1 20 Y <10 <10 <10 00 <10 00 •• 0729/1997 45N-10 10 Y 31 10 150 20 B.1.2 r STABILITY STATION (Y=Yes; DATE STATION DEPTH(m) PYCNOCLINE N=No) COLIFORMS - Feoals Fewls Fecals Totals Totals Totals Top Bottom Stable Surface Midmter Bottom Surface Mitlwater Ba0om 07/29/1997 45N-15 14 2 10 V 42 20 '10 207 75 10 OD2911997 45N-20 17 1 12 Y 31 10 <10 344 42 31 — 07/2911997 6N-10 7 Y -10 00 07/29/1997 6N-15 14 1 13 Y <10 <10 <10 00 00 <10 07/29/1997 6N-20 21 13 16 Y <10 <10 <10 00 00 <10 - 012911997 9N-10 7 Y <10 <10 072911997 9N-15 14 1 12 Y <10 <10 00 <M 00 <10 0729/1997 9NQ0 21 14 15 Y <10 -10 q0 <10 10 <10 08/05/1997 15N-10 9 1 5 Y <10 <10 00 31 — 08/05/1997 1SN-15 13 1 8 V 1 20 1 110 <10 1 20 1 00 10 08/05/1997 15N-20 19 1 7 V 00 1 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 08/05/1997 21N-10 9 Y 00 <10 00 -10 08/05/1997 21N-15 13 1 6 V 00 <10 <10 31 -10 <10 — 08/05/1997 21N-20 19 1 5 V <10 <10 <10 <10 -10 <10 08/05/1997 27N-10 9 1 7 Y <10 10 20 10 O8/0511997 2714-15 14 1 5 Y <10 <10 <10 42 00 <10 OBM5/1997 27N-20 19 1 10 Y <10 10 <10 <10 10 <10 - 08M5/1997 33N-10 9 Y 20 <10 111 10 08/05/1997 33N-15 14 Y 20 <10 01) 364 f0 <10 081OW1997 33N-20 19 1 10 Y 00 00 00 75 <10 <10 08105/1997 39N-10 8 Y 53 10 453 31 — 081OW1997 39N-15 14 1 9 1 Y 99 <10 00 831 42 42 08105/1997 39N-20 19 2 7 Y 42 <10 00 288 -10 00 081OW1997 3N.10 8 Y <10 00 <10 00 08/05/1997 3N-15 14 1 7 Y <10 <10 00 <10 <10 00 — 08105/1997 3N-20 18 1 11 Y <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 081OW1997 45N-10 10 V 53 10 384 42 08105/1997 45N45 14 1 9 Y 87 -10 <10 2005 124 10 _ 08105/1997 45N-20 17 1 5 V 00 <10 00 99 10 <10 08105/1997 6N-10 8 V <10 <10 00 <10 08105/1997 6N-15 14 1 7 V <10 <10 <10 00 <10 <10 08105/1997 6N-20 19 1 17 Y <10 <10 <10 00 <10 10 — OSM511997 919-10 9 Y 10 <10 20 <10 08105/1997 9N-15 13 1 9 Y 00 <10 <10 <10 10 10 08105/1997 9N-20 19 1 18 Y 00 <10 -10 10 <10 <10 08/12/1997 15N-10 9 1 6 Y <10 <10 10 <10 — 08112/1997 15N-15 14 6 12 Y 00 10 <10 20 10 00 08112/1997 15N-20 21 6 18 Y 10 <10 <10 53 00 00 08/12/1997 21N40 9 6 7 Y 10 <10 20 710 O8112/1997 21N-15 13 1 10 Y 00 00 <10 10 -10 <10 — 08112/1997 21N-20 19 4 17 Y <10 <10 <10 00 10 00 08112/1997 27N-10 8 1 7 Y 10 <10 42 <10 08112/1997 27N-15 13 2 6 Y <10 10 00 20 10 <10 08112/1997 27N-20 17 1 16 Y 00 00 <10 10 <10 <10 — O6112/1997 33N.10 8 Y 20 <10 20 <10 08112/1997 33N-15 14 1 12 Y 00 00 <10 1 00 1 <10 <10 08112/1997 33N-20 19 2 18 Y <10 <10 <10 I <10 10 <10 - 08112/1997 39N40 8 Y 20 -10 75 <10 Oe112/1997 39N-15 13 1 6 Y 10 <10 <10 20 <10 10 08/12/1997 39N-20 19 3 18 IN <10 <10 <10 42 70 <10 08/12/1997 3N-10 8 Y 1 10 1 <10 20 10 — 08112/1997 3N-15 14 4 9 Y 10 <10 <10 37 <10 <10 08112/1997 3N-20 21 5 9 V 10 <10 <10 31 20 <10 — 13.1.3 STABILITY STATION (Y=Yes; DATE STATION DEPTH(m) PYCNOCLINE N=No) COLIFORMS _ Fewls Ferals Fecals Totals Totals Totals Top BOOom Stable Surface Midwater Bottom Surface Midwaler Bottom 08'12/1997 45N-10 9 Y 31 <10 99 <10 08112/1997 45N-15 14 1 6 Y 75 <10 <10 111 <10 110 0811211997 45N-20 17 1 15 Y <10 <10 <10 42 10 <10 0811211997 6N-10 9 Y -10 -10 10 <10 08112/1997 6N-15 14 2 10 Y 00 -10 <10 10 <10 10 08/12/1997 6N-20 21 4 7 Y 00 q0 <10 00 <10 <10 08/12/1997 9N-10 8 Y <10 10 <10 42 OB/12/1997 9N-15 13 1 10 Y 10 <10 10 31 10 10 OB/12/1997 9N-20 20 5 8 Y -10 -10 <10 10 <10 <10 all, • B 1.4 00 APPENDIX B.2 ^y COLIFORM DATA FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS . Total Colgorms July 8.1997 ♦ ♦\ Huntington Beech if . J � � Sen Bow Can 31. 3 3 Figure 13.2-1. Total Coliform Data (MPNI100 mL)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,July S, 1997. Offshore data represent near. surface to near-bottom samples. Orange County Sanllatlan Dlatrlct.Calllomla. q0♦ p .ie Fecal Califor 997 < o ..,.,,,. July 1 -10 .10 Ja o <,a • r < • -"' Huntington Beach �19 I"°• la• + +a la ,o +al ♦ `J Nlu 1<+a lio .m <io♦ _ �<to I:Is m <10 10.4 _ 10• q <10 10 '<101 _ q it 10 It w• a10• elo • 1.j+ N ,to t<IO 0 g0 <IO 0 N <10•, 0♦ <10 <t0e <,o 0 0 < o \.�rv• ao • <IO\<io• o .,o • <IC <lo <m San a "el v]sary it a Figure B.2-2. Fecal Coliform Data (MPN/100 mL)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,July g, 1997. Offshore data represent near- surface to near-bottom samples. o�a�ye eeemy sarvnaee�o�so-��t.e.,nl,,,�c� 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I TotalColifonns 151997 July 15,1997 • % +` 13k, n Huntington Beach • —foie oox \ ♦ ♦ II it ♦ �_ 'Ay • n \ y- °J w N ♦\ N • \• San nal pvsox Figure B.2-3. Total Coli(orm Data (MPN/100 mL)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,July 15, 1997. Offshore data represent near. surface to near-bottom samples. maya cwmv sai:nauw:o�m�i.caumx:u Fecal Coliforms 10 \� July 15. 1997 6 10 J Poi b to 0 0 <tpl. 31' 42 33N Huntington Beach 1➢ e1 <to 0 20 1a to 10 m as m 01 'm� m • Iioi �p ♦ <m +o c+0 1°0 c 0 i:N A 10. o\ ia♦ Z. °' oi♦ g+ goo �gN y tp� _<tpi 5p0 /rN �° .io• aa. <tpi ` `m 10 __ <t0�\�to ` i0 my o \ A '<to <10 <t0y cto 10 <10 qo ip q1�0 <10i +a `20� <tp p �°♦ ao110 0 <m San a net ON 3 Figure B.2-4. Fecal Coliform Data (MPN/100 mL)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,July 15, 1997. Offshore data represent near- surface to near-bottom samples. orange county sanitation District.Callromla. t 1 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I • �� Total Coliform \\\ Juiy 22.1997 ♦ Q ♦ \'\ Huntington Beach • • v PD n • m ice' N on ♦� N ♦ \• t _1 San a nal Hoax n s a B Figure B.2-5. Total Coliform Data(MPN/100 mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys,July 22, 1997. Offshore data represent near- surface to near-bottom samples. Cwnp Sannanm,on'nd C.I.I.— �-- - \ Fecal 2.1997 st°J _ July 22.7997 zo �� nri . 6 Po� iely�—19N <w -� Huntington beach 0 `,a 0r m o u mo -1n:. ']N ♦ \\ <tqo o t to naoox �� <I to 0 02' a +o 0 < a <ig' 0 i<1l0 attic <, '<tbl 20 1SN M a Z. zoos. q0 ID�♦,, 91y,/6N ry <m Rio• m n <m ro <lo m <m 0 m <10 <1 + =lo' o n g� g 0 <lo <tn 4 <IgID .'. lay < <Ig Ig ro San a nel vssox n 3 t 9 Figure 8.2-6. Fecal Coliform Data (MPN/100 mL)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,July 22, 1997. Offshore data represent near- surface to near-bottom samples. Orange Counly sanilauon Deed.Calilorree • tom" Total CDlilarms Jury 29,1997 i n ♦ � 0 ♦ •♦\ Huntinglon Beach ♦ ♦ 11 v aaary � � 1 !1 K \ ♦ ♦ ♦ �. c 5+. I n ason San a nei n s s Figure B.2-7. Total Coliform Data (MPN/100 mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys,July 29, 1997. Offshore data represent near- surface to near-bottom samples. O,a,ye C.unv D611,1. at Fecal 1, s July 29,9,19g797 axle <—o♦ 'S o 0 "0 31 e �• If, Huntington Beach m <t �e to<to <t a toe 10 1N t° �„X10 Rio 00 10 wtpi <ty- �111� a 1°r .A <tn♦ c <i°e to'♦ 10 31 <me�<io m aoe <m�<tne 0 0" <t 110 San a rV vmON n 3 3 9 Figure B.2-9. Fecal Coliform Data(MPN/100 mL)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,July 29, 1997. Offshore data represent near. surface to near-bottom samples. 0ran9n coanry seniiaua.D.W..Calllomle. [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 I t I l 1 1 • \ F...r. Total Colilorms • • X"'Rb. b August S.1997 • •-- Huntington Beach y � • 1 r0 • \• • U 16YH Son AIM 3 3 S Figure B.2-9. Total Coliform Data (MPNI100 mL) Collected During Water Quality Surveys,August 5, 1997. Offshore data represent near. surface to near-bottom samples. or„y.crony s.r„mua D.I.It c.ruwr,m,. 0, N 53 Facet Coliforms erg 10 August5. 1997 +a♦ ;,INb au 50 la .+0• 'I` Huntington Beach •Ip Tp az♦ m <+0 al tp 1 oo <10 < < Ip p m 0e <ID -10 <10 <10 � <1D♦ <;0 Io♦ `< m 0 —<M y <10 p� p,, <10♦ '0° <10Go � <_10 <10 0 - <��\<Ip N 0 Ipe <m 010 <10 <I\<w ap o <'p• <lo* ` 0�[I`pl 0� <m <m <tp <10 <Ip San net nn0n s Figure B.2-10. Fecal Coliform Data(MPNI100 mL)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,August 5, 1997. Offshore data represent near-surface to near-bottom samples. Orange County Samlalmn D�slnCi.Calilorna • ~.�� �� \ \ Total 199 ♦\\\ \ \ Augustt 12 12. 1997 ♦ •\ '° Huntington Beach 2 \ -� rx y m ♦ ♦ v ox San a tKi 3 t 8 Figure B.2AII. Total Colitorm Data (MPNII00 mL)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,August 12, 1997. Offshore data represent near-surface to near-bottom samples. Q—,Cuu,ny Ssnuuun pam<l Calilmnia. 20, J'N Fecal Coliforms _ J 7 xo 20 Jf N August12, 1997 � • b� � 0 _ t 1ol q 20 120 a?.� e.iN Huntington Beach <1 <io� 10 <io 261 --:•N <10• 100 ` a 1 <1 0 m<o.ox <10 1 <1 QO <t !IN ac m CE eID qo I10 1911 <10 aq 20 C <10 q� L101 —pN GN <10 <10 �1 10 20' 00 <10 < < '10 6G 0 N <10 1 10 J10♦ <10 1 <ty <10 0 o♦ 10 i<m <1g• <10 `ioe mo +0 t0 m +0 � <10 <10 San a riot mason n 3 t a Figure B.2-12. Fecal Coliform Data(MPNI100 mL)Collected During Water Quality Surveys,August 12, 1997. Offshore data represent near-surface to near-bottom samples. orange County Sanitation District,California. 0 u m Ni t Figure B.2-13. Three-Dimensional View of Total Coliform (MPN/100 mL) Patterns During Water Duality Surveys, July 8, 1997. Orange County Sanitation District.California s 50 Ole ZVI m � '�.-._.y�-.,...,��r.4a...w.. - •..`,__,�T�1' �``.ter�-_ p -- f' r z - Figure B.2-14. Three-Dimensional View of Total Coliform (MPN/100 ni Patterns During Water Quality Surveys,July 15, 1997. Note higher concentrations shown by green surface layer extending from the north. Orange County sanitation District.California. I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 so (I 1 �-•_.,.��"'����+`�1 ( .�"' �`-�. ������ 1 ,ley r� �'�ti v "M z Figure B.2-15. Three-Dimensional View of Total Coliform (MPN/100 mL) Patterns During Water Quality Surveys, July 22, 1997. Note higher concentrations shown by red and green surface layer extending from the north. Orange County Sanitation District California Tdel 25 0 vk 1N 50 —� _ — -.15N...—_9N z Figure B.2-16. Three-Dimensional View of Total Coliform (MPN1100 mL) Patterns During Water Quality Surveys,July 29, 1997. Note higher concentrations shown by green surface layer extending from the north. Orange County senitafi n Diwnm Califopnia. t 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 Zz- 2..._.. .. ._ __ r 1 f Figure B.2-17. Three-Dimensional View of Total Coliform(MPN/100 ml-) Patterns During Water Quality Surveys,August 5, 1997. Note higher concentrations shown by red and green surface layer extending from the north. 0range Coonry Sanpn0on DDmn.California .� .- ...ZN / ems,` -.15N J -_ Yelk - - 8/1267' Figure B.2-18. Three-Dimensional View of ToMl Coliform (MPN/100 ni Patterns During Water Quality Surveys,August 12, 1997. Orange County Sanllafion District.California. % Figure B.2-19. Three-Dimensional View of Fecal Coliform (MPN/100 mL) Patterns During Water Duality Surveys,July 8, 1997. Orange County Sanitation Oisind,California. f so s Figure B.2-20. Three-Dimensional View of Fecal Coliform (MPN/100 mL( Patterns During Water Duality Surveys, July 15, 1997. Orange County Sanitation District,California. 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 9 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 r r` 50 Figure B.2-21. Three-Dimensional View of Fecal Coliform (MPN/100 mL) Patterns During Water Quality Surveys,July 22, 1997. Orange County Sanitation District,California D f fr `yam � '"�^'-Hn-�f���4• 'fA "A �y J ul� ' r�:- lyhl l L., Figure B.2.22. Three-Dimensional View of Fecal Coliform (MPN/100 mL) Patterns During Water Quality Surveys,July 29, 1997. Orange County Sanitation District,California. 1 1 1 t 1 A 1 qQW 4 rfM f� yr�ys�,�-..-+"^-•.r Y �f�� � (�,r i 1 / f � 714 Figure 13.2-23. Three-Dimensional View of Fecal Coliform (MPN/100 mL( Patterns During Water Quality Surveys,August 5, 1997. Orange County Sanitation District.California. A •,, 03 fA i Figure B.2-24. Three-Dimensional View of Fecal Coliform (MPN/100 ni Patterns During Water Quality Surveys,August 12, 1997. Orange Cwnty sanitation District.California. r .y s H APPENDIX B.3 SALINITY DATA FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS w r 0^9 QIP1 \\\ eeac� Jcd00o Vol a: y m j OCSD / Outfall Figure B.3-1. Regional Patterns of Salinity(psu),July 8, 1997. Note dark blue pattern near surface, indicating lower salinity extending from the north. Orange County Sanitation District.California. 0 5°9\lea°� eso\' oce Ole, m w N lip SD •� , OC/ Outfall SD Figure B.3-2. Regional Patterns of Salinity(pau),July 15. 1997. Note dark blue pattern near surface, indicating lower salinity extending from the north. Orange CDunly Sanitation District.Calllomla. eSOM —�00�e rp�ef c Sao be p09 -MONOW w OCSD Outfall I � I Figure 6.3-3. Regional Patterns of Salinity(psu),July 22, 1997. Note dark blue pattern near surface, indicating lower salinity extending from the north. Orange County Sanitation District.California. eaeot` 11 o9 --- - eec See\ b Oft ° Qan, ?\et IP c OCSD Outfall x Figure B.3-4. Regional Patterns of Salinity(psu),July 29, 1997. Note dark blue pattern near surface, indicating lower salinity extending from the north. Orange County Sanitation Dlaeid,California. OGII � �es�6 ea �e� c y Pi _aP_ N OCSD ^� Outfall �i. a Figure B.3-5. Regional Patterns of Salinity(psu),August 5, 1997. Note dark blue pattern near surface, indicating lower salinity extending from the north. Orange Counly Sa.lalion Dwnu,California. each �oa90 Q�¢t r ec e SeaiMR yea 160 ,. \. y>C? Vt m R OCSD Outfall G Figure B.3-6. Regional Patterns of Salinity(psu),August 12, 1997. Note dark blue pattern near surface, indicating lower salinity extending from the north. Orange County Sanitation Dlslnct.Calilo nia. � 1 u iJ u �i r 4 APPENDIX BA y TEMPERATURE-SALINITY PLOT DATA FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS 1.+ ' i Id J i� J J J a r M ll 7/8/97 .r 22 _ - � x x• + 21 + II 20 • r o 19 - � 18 + x 7 �Jx C 17 L r H 16 15 • r 14 r 13 - - — -- - - -- 32 32.5 33 33.5 34 r Salinity(ppt) •03N-10 ■ 3 -if 3 -2 x 6 -1 * 6 -1! 6 -2+ 9 -1 - 9 -1 952 15 -1 15 -1t 15 -2 21 -1 21 .1621 -2 27 -1 -27 -1C 27 -2 + 33 -1 33 -15. 33 -2 x 39 -1 x 39 -16 39 -2+ 45 -1 -45 -15-45 -2 w • 51 -1 ■51 -1151 -2 x 57 -1 x 57 .1557 -2+ 63 -1 -63 -1 S.63 -2 66 -1 ■66 -19 66 -2 x 69 -1 x 69 -16 69 -2 Figure B.4.1. Temperature-Salinity (T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey. July 8, 1997. Orange County Sanna;on Oiz:nn.Canlomia 8.4.1 7/15/97 ~ s � 2244 ■ x �. 21 ■ x + J • • • 20 ■ t + r 0 19 + x- 18 ■ ♦ ♦ x `w 17 � - x .. a ■ - F 16 • x - r 15 L r 14 _ 13 33 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 33.8 Salinity (ppt) V ♦03N-10 ■ 3 -1 E 3 -2 x 6 -1 x 6 -1! 6 -2+ 9 -1 - 9 -IS- 9 -2 u 15 -1 15 -1 r 15 -2 21 -1 x 21 -16 21 -2 27 -1 -27 -15 27 -2 33 -1 33 -1S33 .2x 39 -1 x39 .1539 -2+45 -1 -45 -15-45 -2 p1 ♦ 51 -1 ■ 51 .11151 -2 x 57 -1 x 57 -15 57 -2+ 63 -1 -63 -15.63 -2 V 66 -1 ■66 -19 66 -2 x 69 -1 x 69 -16 69 -2 Figure B.4-2. Temperature-Salinity (T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey,July 15, 1997. NO orange County sanitation Duyntt.Lanlomiz B.4.2 r 7/22/97 22 ■ + * + x 21 • A * xx + ■ T _ i -� Z zo • ■ U — 19 • .A - 18 x • ••+�'� m 17 r E F 16 15 « • 14 13 33 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity(ppt) ♦ 03N-10 ■ 3 -1 F 3 -2 , 6 -1 x 6 -19 6 -2 + 9 -1 - 9 -16- 9 -2 15 -1 15 -IF 15 -2 21 -1 = 21 -15 21 -2 27 -1 -27 -IS-27 -2 33 -1 33 -15 33 -2 x 39 -1 x 39 -1 g, 39 -2+ 45 -1 -45 -1 r►45 -2 _ • 51 -1 . 51 -1151 -2 x 57 -1 x 57 -15 57 -2+ 63 -1 -63 -1r►63 -2 66 -1 • 66 -15 66 -2 x 69 -1 x 69 -19 69 -2 Figure B.4.3. Temperature-Salinity (T.S) Plots for Water Quality Survey, July 22. 1997. o,anee County San.a.nonoomot camo,n,a B.4 3 r � r r 7/29/97 r 22 21 20 e U 19 x + 18 • Sµr • < • � CIL E -or tt '' ~ 16 • xx Y 15 =a 14 A. 13 -- �- 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 Salinity(ppt) • 03N-10 ■ 3 -1 F 3 -2 - 6 -1 x 6 -19 6 -2+ 9 -1 - 9 -IS- 9 -2 15 -1 15 -If' 15 -2 21 -1 x 21 .19 21 -2 27 -1 -27 -16-27 -2 433 -1 -,, 33 -15 33 -2 x 39 -1 x 39 -19 39 -2+ 45 -1 -45 -1 r►45 -2 Y ♦ 51 -1m51 -1951 -2x57 .1x57 .1557 -2+ 63 -1 -63 -16-63 -2 66 -1 ■66 •19 66 -2 x 69 -1 x 69 .1669 -2 y �I Y 1 � Figure B.4-4. Temperature-Salinity (T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey, July 29, 1997. Orange County Saturation Oistricr.Caigornra B.4.4 r 8/5/97 22 21 r 20 ■ x + x � 0 19 - 5 18 ■t� •} x + +1 m 17 *6 6 a 16 • x ■ 15 r 14 x• 13 32.6 32.8 33 33.2 33.4 33.6 33.8 _ Salinity (ppQ ♦03N-10 ■ 3 -If 3 -2 6 -1 * 6 -1! 6 -2 + 9 -1 - 9 -IS- 9 -2 15 -1 15 -IF 15 -2 21 -1 x 21 -19 21 -2 27 -1 -27 -15.27 -2 33 -1 33 A S 33 -2 x 39 -1 x 39 .1939 -2+ 45 -1 -45 -15.45 -2 ♦ 51 -1 ■ 51 -1 S 51 -2 x 57 -1 x 57 .1557 -2+ 63 -1 -63 -16-63 -2 66 .1w66 -1 r 66 -2 x 69 -1 * 69 -1! 69 -2 Figure 15.4-5. Temperature-Salinity (T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey, August 5, 1997. Orange County Sanpaaon Dlsra.Ca4lornia r B.4 5 r r 8/12/97 22 21 r x 20 ■ AL n —� 0 i 19 _ ■� •`■ r 1g ■ 7x 7 X� 0 17 •. r 16 ■ �- 15 14 13 —� —� r 32.9 33 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 33.7 Salinity (ppt) r ri 03N-10 ■ 3 -1 E 3 -2 x 6 -1 x 6 -1! 6 -2+ 9 -1 - 9 -15 9 -2 15 -1 15 -1E 15 -2 21 -1x21 -1121 -2 27 -1 -27 -15-27 -2 V 33 -1 33 .1533 -2 x 39 -1 x 39 -16 39 -2+ 45 -1 -45 -16-45 -2 ♦ 51 -1 ■ 51 -1151 -2 x 57 -1 x 57 -15 57 -2+ 63 -1 -63 -19►63 -2 66 .1066 .15 66 -2 x 69 -1 x 69 -16 69 -2 r r Figure B.4-6. Temperature-Salinity (T-S) Plots for Water Quality Survey, August 12, 1997. r Orange County S.n.wi Olaton.Calilornia. r 8.4.6 I � u :' i u V . i y APPENDIX B.5 64 TEMPERATURE AND SALINITY PLOTS BY DEPTH FOR 1997 WATER QUALITY SURVEYS �1 U ; I G.I i 4 LI J 6J u J i� u 1 1 I I i I I I I I I I I [ _ l 1 1 1 l =WI y o e o s Figure B.5-1. Salinity and temperature profiles for July 8, 1997. Station profiles are shown by depth contour; 10-m(top), 15-m(center), and 20-m(bottom). Orange County Sanitation District.California. x, I Figure B.5.2. Salinity and temperature profiles for July 15, 1997. Station profiles are shown by depth contour; 10-m (top), 15-m (center),and 20-m (bottom). Orange County Sanitation District,California. - •mIF Figure B.5-3. Salinity and temperature profiles for July 22, 1997. Station profiles are shown by depth contour; 10-m (top), 15-m (center), and 20-m(bottom). Orange County Sanitation District.California. PO Figure B.5-4. Salinity and temperature profiles for July 29, 1997. Station profiles are shown by depth contour; 10-m (top), 15-m (center), and 20-m(bottom). Orange County Sanitation Oistrid.California. 1 1 1 I I [ i 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I. . . 111 n I „ 12 , W _ _ Figure B.5-5. Salinity and temperature profiles for August 5, 1997. Station profiles are shown by depth contour; 10-m(top), 15-m (center), and 20-m (bottom). Orange Coumy Sa,,,M.OiW,d G lilornia Figure B.5-6. Salinity and temperature profiles for August 12, 1997. Station profiles are shown by depth contour; 10-m(top), 15-m (center), and 20-m(bottom). Orange County Sanitation DistnCt.California STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on ((, a q 200-Q, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on "C, a/ 200a. �q IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this_,g./may of 200,. Penny M. I le, Sec tary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District GAWR.DTA\ADMIMBSTORM6\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC